Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA99-155 LEGEND .\0\4 IH --— - n comma CO A ERa/1 SWUM , PUCET SOUND POWER IH L-J 9Rmc WNW �A? S 'R� h L1GHT COMPANY � IH KUSH&wavy / JJJIII CO cowman'.wax ---\— _- --i. "v \ ° \.- 1 R-% RESOU11Pa ZONE .. v 1 IH ,, V3\2‹ '94i3 . -,^-" \ :: ••'.•'•••'. 'dJ +.,�/ �'S' `o!"� TOISREMAINTING �KING LOT \J �� /fin, toso �V,ZVCIE 2.0 l01 B 1��.jOp��0ir� SU s ®I� f �t IH N �r 5-1 Ijl;�' a\1, ' % • . w 4 NEW BOEING ,_..�p09 � ;y .;9 0» �� {I���/ PARKING LOT SITE 11 Vt % "% •\ti tik Lo '7 1 I I°-e° ���l 111 1_d N. STREET I*A., nn I i O EXISTING PARKING LOT 11 TO REMAIN L ENV RA ROAD �y 1-aa �.-os .s] r---r' ra' .. • W� 1H 3 I L _. s O a:. \ .....,-"'-'r,ti.., CO 1 CO \. —.j - IysQ]11 s Er D 0 IH O \:::ic,'': ' �J ; S•' j Z I z PACCAR I . ..-.•1.:-......-...':,' S a IH <, z g N ' I ,y co 4 1 1. TNmIH . ,cr {`]N' ` G13 \\ II 1p1pII I I-,_zz a1-- - _ •UBLIC; vs',a s Ov PLANNING SUBMITTAL a .........e‘.................:.........:1:.... PLAN VIEW O Harris Group 610 SCALE:1•..oO' . 99-1m91 w. Wielei IV AMMO PI. MOM IMO 8WEE9 'A's" >w IN e'eCUPT°B41r i...01AR 6011 '''''' .___Jlia •• •'•••••'•1'• NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP �� 0 to.'ss9 5BOE/Anw• ° s OM. 'a K ; x a Ii°Nlp 6M." mt PROPOSED MOM LOT RI N 1 1 COS ° `�" RENTON SITE .�ma CNL WATER RENTOM'®•' ROT-TO-NI . LEGEND \\\\\\\\\1\r,\\\\'•' \\\\\\3\,�\\\\`• \ `\\\\\ `�\\\\`•' \\\\\\�-`,\\\\\•• �_ uaoA e N _ �— �'}Enmxc LANDSCAPING \\�\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\1\�\\\\\ \\(1\ \ \\\\\+` \\\\\ \\"\\1 1 r r r r u ull —•— E70mNG WATERLINE - '`\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\�\\�\\\\\\ 11\\\\�\\\\\;\1` \\\\ `\\\�\\\\���\\\\\\\ i% /�u, 1••-��-I--�-, I III�1111T111T11171111111T1 ..I I NEW WATERLINE ,\\ \\\ \\\\\ , ;r:;, I. _I-I++f-HI-I--I+� I Q NEW POMP OF CONNECTION AND '(\\\\" \\\'\\\\"'"\\\\\ \\\\ \\ // \��\iJ\ram I ®� d- EEM ANUNC LIN Him 1 1 1 1 I I CONTROLLER FOR SPEENELER STETA 1'• Y• ova \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\+ \\ \\\\�\\ \\\\\ + ;,war'' I 1.Lllil1'IIIIII1IIIIIIII IITilarllrf7111 III 1 \�0\\\\ \\\\\\ \ \\ \\\ � 3;1�ry , •--• 1 I I I I I I I N I I I I H I I I I I I I I I I I I AI I I I III , 1.1 .ram 1 1 l l l rrrrrl I rrrrrl l Ail 1 \\.�\ \\\�\\ o,„.� i' .:✓"`' I 1111.LLLI.�.LI.I.Ii.LLl.�.1.1.1...1.1..1..l.l.l..l.l.-.l.l.l.l ' I� \\ \\\\\\\\\����\\�\ \\ \\\\\\\\ ���\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\ � \\\ \\\\\° ✓ �ru I 11'1'1•I •1'1.ITITI'I'ITLI 'I'I I'I.11'I-I'I'I'I'fl'ITI'l#I'I'I �\ \ r \\\ ;:r✓ I 1 ' 1 .I.I LLI I.1.I 1.1.1.1.1.1-I.LI,I.I.I I LL1.1.1.1.1.1.1.61.1.1.1 1.1.1 ' I'I \\v\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\ \\\\\\\\ _— \\\\\ •!/ Q.;r✓NOk.`i� ,` 1 9 i. I I \\\\\ \\\\\\ \�\� cr� �P` .�sss..... ... �::+:1J�LI1U1L112 pd, �I \ '•' \ \�\\\\ \\ .' •�tt; '�\; MG LOT \1 e. 4——— � �L�'-"I 4 b 40.\ _�\. _ \\•• -� "' �oon��o tici h III - --. JJp .—t=llI=e�asnxEP-.7iL —1— —L `� \\` v _ — aJw� \`` `\ C m>.�iluxwxtr3 bl_ 1 '•b Q\Q •"' A Y>-- ___�I I I I I I I = I I I • 9,` \b�R1�• — - — tv. � N I I I I I IITfITf —7CI I I IL � I 1 id ' \��° •+,3 ��\�'•� _-1 \�: :\: i; �I hY111111rr -1H1f ltititiil1NIIA � 3 •III \ .\ ��� - • I I I I I I Io-I I I I I I p �^ `\ �/; � %i: � \TD\ \IN •�;C -1� ; b`I4 `. • �ffff(fi(Illllll Ilff(f(IfIl1TTT� 1 i11 �..\\j\\� '''.0)-, \ �,� '• I p \ .. .... ..... b. -. l l l l l I J J I 1 \\\\ �\ �\ ``°�.�•' I \':_:.:o- ;es: it i I I I I I I I I I i t I I I 11111{I 14 S \� i' 'r':... _ •ill . .... 1111 11 • 11 ,,,11I1II1 1 '® � ,'1 .� ,.; ;'_� r:;.• Si,,- aL-v •�:.`4.;t7,:7�x-.;;V' '•\�••.,::: e?':�re�•.'•....,� .., ' •,. • _ 11 I 1 1•a k{y\U r! I 1 oil _ ♦ F705aN0 GNDSClPNC— *1 "Y • \ `�` `mow• 400;A _ �a o�u sl, —�o LIiLJ.f.1_J-1—i�_1—r✓G J—�i_L� /-_----._ _ • _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 3 �- _ t ..A J—I�_I �•-I �_ _ _ _ i \ �O OO .I e. l `-�� y T T T�—I� J \ 3.. \O`O \o t 1 bbl Vl 1 11 1 LEGEND — I ' — — L 1.1 ,,.,1; ° o1 0 I \ \ \� , 1 PI I PLANT SCHEDULE • •• 6 \ \ �\ `' \ ') ® I '�} ' SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME SYMBOL NOTES O �(� \� \ \ `�h� Irafl r� I EMS Nag \ \\\ I. NO CONTg1R5 SHOWN BECAUSE LOT 6 MT. VO. \ ` • . * T 1 1 .•� O FRAEINUS AMERIClU14'AUTUMN PULE /AUTUMN PURPLE A511 S.CAL. BkB.MATCHED FORM C� `! \ \\\\\\w \��\JJ11 • I OUFRCUS ROBUR FAS GW1A'/COLUMNAR ENC SN OA p 7/2"CAL B&B,MATCHED FORM \ ' 1 11 1 t t t r O SHRUBS ]I'-y0'SPR Bd 8,FULL FO ADE SCALE IN FEET \ , I I ' .= CROUNDCOVERS SCALE 1•=60• �\ a T � 1 �1 1I I I I I I 1 9+ o.c. ���. \` ,\ I I I {i I I I in,' I JRRRueus uLrcwomes/BRAMB E PLANNING SUBMITTAL ® i SPRNEIER SPUTUM PONT OF CONNECUON Harris Group YIC. 99-10629 sw M® • AMMO w[ er• M® er MOO ea ACCEPTARMY G fum KW10 '���� 991099 r • 0 10.1199 9 RAMC Poem wire 10.110s oa>a b LANDSCAPE PLAN 1 iceLBOE/A/!� �.m. oaR ManMA • rz 0.map lnlefl PROPOSED PARNND LOT!B C400 /1.116,133 "MS" RENTON SITE I "p°11° CML&ASTER RENTON o.a d I NEW COALESCING PLATE 36'WOE CURB CUT - EXISTING 30'TISO1ARCE PONT OLL/WATER SEPARATOR FOR DRAINAGE BASW/15 1/3 OF A 2 YEAR STORM 0 25 YEAR=10 CFS \\\U� - FORTING 1'RCA FENCE - o/ '�\\\\\' \\\\\1\ \\\\" \\\\\+-'�\ "'. , ' \\\\�"" \\1`' \\ \-\-= - - - - —a m■ �— t\\�' �\ \\\\\\� \\\\\ \\\�\ \\\\\\ \\\\ `\\\\\\\\ \\ \\' \\\\ pi• t}1rt i- 1 I . \\\ \\\\ \,0, \\\\\ \\\T \\\\\ \\, \\� - 7rnTrnTrnTrnlrnTrnlr� •'IIIIII I \\\� �\R \\`\\ \�\1 C\�\``\ ,\\ \\ \\�' -\\("� \\\\\\v. \\ \\`\\j\' •..•• _ 1 �; [---I{-�—I- -I--ICI I I�l l l i w l 1 \\\\`\\\ i \\\ NEW, \\\\ \\ ✓1 •••••• \ ,1 a BYPASS o— III11I I I I \\\\\\\\ \(\\\` \\\\ \\\\\\\ \\\\\\�\ y\! sraa\\ \j���\\ \ �� ••''•j // GK T. k LIIII I111111111IIII1 11111111111III III \\\ \ \\\\\ ol. sa \\\\\ \\\\\\ •...... .- dam; _ Y5 \l _1 r TM 1 11 hi I I 1 I 1 I I _ I \' R' S� \\\\\•- \\UY \\\\" \\ L—' \\\ \ \\ 'RAWAGE: , 1. `\\\\\. ,�•• / ' LI I III NGLOT I III I I I \\\\\`\\�\\\\\\\� \\\\\\-- \\\ \\\\ \\ \--\\\\\\\\\\\\\G\2N\\Ok' \ \\\\\\ •...... :-- �.1" ,'� y\ moo" rr�j� .—srsI i 091QIxIGlPARI�IIONdGNWCTI�DIAII I�``\\ \��\\\\\\ ,, \ \`;=\\\\;\' \ D�,,y , ;\�`\T\\\\`1�-c\\\\�z�\` .:, J' :.o 9/SidLS- _..:: [:�: v' �14.•;, \\�A'. ` 5�� •W ! I 1.11.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1 :LLr�..�.l...l.l.l.l....l.l.l-I 1 I \\\ \ \\ \\\\\\�\1-\\\ \\ \\\ \_. ``\\\b'fl.1o. 15 \ \\\\ \- ..... ••• 00.. f_ T; i 1 \\\\\\\\\\�\\\\\\\\\\\\\\`\\\`��� \\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\�\\T f\�\�•••••�•..%/ �G • �.: > Q / wHx "�"v' 8 I f 1 l'I I 1 I rl l l l_rl rrrri'I rl rrrl'I'I rl'rrl'rl rrl \ Sn .N it I!I I I.I.II I I.I.I.II.I.I.I.I.I.I.I II I I..I�II..II II..1b1bII I I II.II 1 \\ \\�\i\�\\ \\\\\ \\\\ `�\\\\ \\\\iy.: 'i•••' 6� •�;�U y ��� 5 VAOC' R !I �' ASOCIAL YEIRU'804NG.. 1 \\ \\\`\\ \\\\ \\\\ \\\ �' �t'.• �•� r, COMMUTER Bus .• r�\\\\\�SnIVG PAR�x �Q`\ \y\�\'\ \ ��•',• 0,0000. ''(;r ,., •... ' / P c SOT `\1 �/ B ........---�• - - j 1 1 1 1 lit dLI 1 as'liar p - -, --. — ,....- __ alk . \ it =. /--- ��_'�rs� —-1= ,y \�\ a d ' �. "xr nGA % 1 FLOW _ Inc. L• •{dl4 �1\ I ll\, �� - - -6 A ` a . „ OD 14 _ i HEM J r l I —ET N ARNINC-L I I l %-, `�O` / 4=I= —To UNI__ \V, _"\ ��� 5tS B�" STS I SOS . STS 4 STs—. ' 'JO `� ��\ ! •`� I_ DRANACe..,,,, 0 1 L. -\a ,,,,0 'to \�� l r \fUOX I =DRAINAGE BASIN 1 ^ o— !1 • '— !J.\ ��..6 \ \ A. _ G `\\� \\\ a \A A Ts�• aA , FLOW l • I 1 l ri , \ ♦ I now 1. \\ . \\\\\�\\ It/ ,`.\ \\•\\``-_=i=_ i- ii, QIQ \\„� sitTs\\� 5�'.♦ 5 ACH BA .'SI I CNIIlER 6ANNE7I MUIIII�II� �I IIIIIIII�I �I II I_O--," ?qI I1�— 1 OW411 10' T CK ' y \ \\ '\. �'\s. \ �'s-®Ty° n• t w s zo s :cK a 's—r nov/I — r.. 1:1 .tt•I • TON t FLOW IIn" . rA�d 0 \\, \ \`\ �\\ s 1 `>>;. \ * a L 1 --� �E 1. — AEI® �•m...�_ ll►tea �pr��;�CI ` \\ \,ate •CIA ��_` AV r.i. - w+o.� ��� Ewxmy eURacB 11'2?814g O • \ w/0A' , . 11'III —O�• —L-—4 LA1 ——I.- — - WNW \ Ni \ A, *0 0 '*,,, ,-rAllir' P' g' III-''n, ".41i ,,tr'r ,o, ' : ' — //�/ \ \ \ < • I i' 1 lwr n I LEGEND U. y .1 \\\\ \\ • Op • I I�I I e IXISTINC TYPE I CATCH BASIN . .• ✓//O .. , ____ _ O I 11111 EXISTING TYPE II CATCH BASIN&MANHOLE \ ` \\` 11: EXISTING STORM SEWER 0 • •\A I Ij f„ f� MANAGE BASIN BOUNDRY �\ \\\, •' \ \\\\\��• I1,; ¢ —STS— PROPOSED STORM SEWER SOVE IN FELT \\ , i �\ I I�; 11 1111 L ® PROPOSED OIL/WATER SEPARATOR SCALE 1'.60' 1 \ I II 1''I}I- • PROPOSED TYPE I CATCH BASIN UY \ ` ,`4.''. r �1 i • PROPOSED TYPE 11 GTCH BASIN 1 ' 2 / J 0\\\ � \ \ \ %\ 1 I I I` I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 l ROW STORM WATER SURFACE FLOW PLANNING SUBMITTAL a" NEW SETBACK LANDSCAPING�.:.;I 1A I::ti;::I NEW INTERIOR LANDSCAPING Hares Group ' 99-10629 "` wm °' n.om •` '� Moto '� •� sso ACC EFRA9AJIY P.LK 0°II 10.090 ..� DRAINAGE CONTROL PLAN 991009• l•1m 0 10.15.99 e ;imam WRIT H2/Im 10.1699 OPECOMOS- MS O ON O.COMM 10.II. ie\ BOE.,AC• ...w.m sr COL OM O.DOWN MIMS PROPOSED PARKING LOT 38 C300 \L[T�` t. 1"1s99 RENTON SITE w APPNA\° a CM LUST ER TER RENTON 36•WIDE CURB CUT \� \\r\\YW \\WW" , - — _ XXIII 7'wCH FENCE r \\"- \\\`\\ \\\\\\\\\\\;\\\\\\\\ ��\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \` \\ \\\\\\1\ \\\\\���\\\\\\\�� \�\\ 'C\�\ - —nc,;Mill 1 °1 �01.[■ r. — 111111 E v \\ TrnlrnTrnTrnlrnTrnlr' iiPP \\�� \� \\\�� ��� „\ \\ C '' Ill.. -hid- -1-E-I I+I 1 I I I.uILLIjJ III \"" "' \\ \ \ \\\\ \ \\1\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \ \ \ \\\ ��,�..� a,: .',' aDscNs° , li I�#II klIIIIU III -III IIl�III III III 1 1 \\ ` \\\� \\ '" ,� a"cK \\ sus EE LIIIII 1r I lI11 . 1111I'I \ y\ \\ \\\ \\\ \\ / 5 `,1 s I' I I LLLLLLLLI.1•I-I•LLI.LLI.•..1.1.1....1.1.1.1. ..1.1.1 \\v.\\ ,\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\„\\\\\\\\' \\\\\\\\`" \\\\\ \ \\\\`\+I`c\\\\c'T •0.--. II I \ \\\\\\\\�\\\\.0\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\ 0 \\\\\\ ;\\\�,. \ +... .�.o` :,rsG `` .,.. 1 IP�sTs i\��• �• Ijl Ik.1.l1.1.lt�la.I LLLLLLLLLi.L977171 1l l.l.l \\�\\� \\ \\\\\ \\ \\\.i ..%► fi sty rCS,I I11�y\l', ti I0 7,- 'j. ••• Lail I I I I \\\ \\\\\\ \\\\\\\. \�\\\ • •.•''• �"" 1i•"1 � :eR:'q'-'-"------ -:`:u�=i. Al J1 ai�, 1 A6'wDE i�\\\\\ \\\\\\ \\\\�CC\�`\\ ' .,J� ``.,, v i\\ 111� � _r �� $� �� TAT �, \\`\\\ \.�' j mow. ,�, 3` u ���0.\ -�•� ,•, �I \\r \ Ss i\� �T93 I /i!*Lill �t\ -1 i c /�� •,•�• _ 1 _ 1100- 11 ?PO Q-sTs/• y '• ��jl.�.'�I� .;I .•7'• -1- E�1a9�1"DM� `�i`` K/'' BV61.C°'5v _ r _.jori�_/ '` ` 4 -J o _A A�I� ��IIpD==---— L �1s f— srs . �b M lt sis 7{.AY o- 0. �i `S i ;� I Os \\\\i\\ ��., �• N \\� �+f—�� 1 d� m /�/ rig41.1 +I fI I yI yI I{o-II/I rII — €l7 1\ \ • 1- •III 5. sTs OIIII�iiII�IIIIIIIiIIIi�II�AI 1 =IA II.'\ \\\\\\ 1 r �� , y . I1 I - '/_la -s., `°ets_1 _ P... ! TS 11' �!K=M l L _ - ,' u,dt, r6• ,Ifirameita� D'SETBAcc �= � 6 FAN,, • 1 \ \ rL7�� ,1 m �•WD'c_ _ .. .■■•�.,.■ — — ' — —— — —iwsru�s6�fimou—sl 1 w :_:_ n \\\\ . a_ .<��; WITH a .��.uE -CNN-—_ ■■ems:._:_..--- j- •;�Of24= ■I f' \\ \` \,F\ _z. d• :1 _ �r..e.���wrpa�llrs.ra .. ... ��=` ' 41 % \ \ .41p. o , , .+r A•'. -+r- — 4=Aa —— } , _ I' i +'_� • ti .V - ar.---x- ,• Gi�iGfifi'EI I i j1 \ \\ \� O O I(�1 t 11 I LEGEND i a $ 9 \ \\ 'T ‘.• B .� 1 e EXISTING TYPE I CATCH BASIN ■ b ' `\ \\ �� Ij1�II v • EXISTING TYPE II CATCH BASIN •a;F 1 1 O Sn A \ \ \ '��'-\ -,Pi. •1F, �{ -sNl� EXISTING SANITARY SEWER Inc \ \' \\ -� iimiin -Srs� EXISTING STORM SEWER VO \ \ \ �(�*!ri 1 I ii I -.- ExlmNc COLD WATER 60• ]�p 6 ■� • � •\\\..m.X. " 'ayF'� IXISTING FlRE WATERISGLLE IN FEEF �� 1'11� 'IIII 1 I tscuE r-6D' \\k\ \ '�• , eft• I I' -II_Itr' ! ® PROPOSED 7YPE I ER SEPARATOR • �� I t• -F- PROPOSED FIRE LINEy`\\� ,` !'' II I C / -SIS- PROPOSED STORM SEWERS7n � \ \ Td'' 1 III I I I I I ▪ PROPOSED::I GTCH BASIN PLANNING SUBMITTAL fa • PROPOSED TYPE II CATCH BASIN Ara PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT Harris Group Ina HY .M XSISTING FIRE HYDRANT 99-10529 rn Ni om . AMMO me m m® Of mT ACCEPTABILITY P.MELODY To. UTILITIES PLAN 991089 t I 10.15.99 I PLfM1 PEW 6 PO IQ/am 1611■ �•• • 6 mnrR 1Q1]99 QLBOE/AEG' nrz n MOM _10.1199 PROPOSED PARIONG LOT!B a C200 mr a -1 vr°"`�" ""°' RENTON SITE tl uwucm CML RASTER RENTON3°" 36'WOE CURB OJT t t EXISTING 7'HIGH FENCE j SQUARE FOOTAGE TICS A TOTN-SQUARE FOOTAGE SRE NC PAWING 978070 \WA. \'6" "' \\+\\\\\\\„Vri•\V\\"\\\\\\\\\.��.\\ +\ �\\\\\\0 \�\\\\\ \\"\\\\\\\/`\3;\!\\\uy.\,�\\\1. _- T Mini I TOTAL PAVED SUFACE PAYED SURFACEOF DaviPPAW 195,4a \• ,\\0\0\\\ \\ -\\\ - , -,--,__;� , TfflTrflTfflTlflTrflTrllTi P TOTAL PAVEDBUILDING SQUARE FO NEW OTAGE Q1b m \+\\\ ,\\\\\;\+\\\+\ 1\\\\\\\\\\\\1 t OVC\C‘‘‘\‘‘" \\\\ \\\\\ - j i '[ I I j PERCENTAGE OF ME COVERED BY BUILDING 0.832 \\\\\\] \"\\ ,\\\\\�� \` ,\\\\ \�\\\ dt }I'II I}}I }I I} I}IIjl--}{I}II}'µ'I-�-�AREA Di NEW NOR(N90E 41BA«S 7}O,i65 �\ \� `ll ,``\\\ — / 1 H I 1I�I111 1 I 1 1 1I4.I1 .I 1 II I I II i 1 I AREA❑NEW NTWOR LANOSCAPINC }6,585 \\ `` \�m�•�\C\\\ ,`\ \\\ `\\\�\•� / BI .1 0 5 777 111NCCC AAARRRKuuu444GGG LOTI�I I 1 I I I 1 PERCENTAGE OF INTERIOR INTERIOR LANDSCAPING 65 1\\ O,.\\%\l \\\\�\l\ 0 \\1 n %- ..: ro XI «AN AREA OF SETBACK LANDSCAPING u75% \\� Y\1\\\\ \\\\\\� \\\\\\ \\ \+j,\\ \ ,�pl� ''- �y1m lTie1 GI Ii 11111 I I I I I I I I I I I I rill I I9I I I I I� I I I�f I I I I \+`\\' \\\\�\\\�\\�\`\\1 \\\+ \ \\v'�1\\\ \ \\\%\\�\1\\\�\1\\1\\ \\\\/\\++1 \(\\\\\\\ � = 5 �ofpP" 111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIII(IIIIIIIIII, III III \ 1\�11�1\11\a\\\ \\\1,\\� \1�\\\` \\1\+1 \�\\\+\ \\1,``�\�1�\\\\�1\\ - - T • eN�K qq 1 I I I I i n I•I 1 rrrrrrrri•rr-—• L \\1 \\\\ , \\\i \N\+ \\+�-- \ \ \ \\ -! , s� \\ 9 I I I I LLLLLLLLLLI.I.LI.i.l.i.l....LLLI.1.1.1+f.�H.-1 g I L \a\� \O \\\\ \11\1 \\\ �11+\ acs"�= e I I I rrrl I I I rrrrrrl'I'rri'I rrrrrrrrrrrrrrl rrl \91\�`\�\+\\\\`\ \\\\�++�`\�\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\�\ \ ti i1� - - wn+lnP' IE.1.11.11 11.1►.LLL—i.LLl-i.�.�.1 I L-i.�.l-�I I L1.1 W 1. couu rtR Bus soP1 u j u I I I I u iliti 'I II i .3.6 W0E \\\ ,\ i 411101 1 I� Ural fk RB OlT 1 q4� % l%�•,,.tc \ paoW !`� � ro 1�1 oeE �_' . j1 ` —� /=I/1 — !\�., COMPACT ROW b L14 , j__ — / tf -_ =I= •••, \ \ NG wi la A GE GG�'"ED'AAulw R I81 Q�.— ( 1ol•�' e1 0 • �, •�ff I E.I.,,- - NGY-141 GA NOf.EB� \ A CO i\� `% ZT'COMPACT ROWigt 1 \ \\`\\\\ /SN \.\ % �. =I_ b fit '-- \ 1\� gli 10-651. o- i \ '\\ '�, \\\ ' 1 I �\� A pAG\ LIMIER ANNEX g I COMPACT ROW 10.SETBACK �- p, I` i1 i 1 t \ \ \\ t,,,..•' \.• \. A ,.. oa I 10•SETBACK CI •CII :i � � 5bA1xY 10Y \C \\� \ / ! \ \ .".vc e9s----��a.r• EI� I I I6mTd1 ,. \,\C`\ �..�. \` ,� s ®r�uBaiim%rL,►` 'dbl4 4,�IL4e,, j \ - \\ '\�_ ' ' �\ 36'rnD[- � - . ',KT .4'::Ilm -- — •1111UI�`_ \ AMlNOONEkISDBG— \ _`_ Ir Al a CURB a�r>_� ,,�_ e," '- \\\ \�.• \\\\ .._- `'!) 'FPwtT—- - Wr•,.alc.�L . ..�-......r..l.v - �m�a'� v:r. - \•\ •.`,♦� �0p _ A �-� ��.i.o..II, —o'ew l—l_LI—L_I-11J1J-L-1—Ii1—LLJ�1 1. -til_il—li-LIL_I • _ - =c __ - _ _ I- `\\\ \� r :O ---_.r 4 : 1 rl-Ir r•-n--TTN-1ri --\ -ANY--\ ,-\/-•/-�f`1- • • -9 4,4 \ �� 1 • H I LEGEND 2 \ \ \ \ '\ ' I II I I ® PARKING OMSION \\, \ OP I I I NEW SETBACK LANDSCAPING EXISTING PARKING NEW PARKING \\ \ !j: ` �'i`` O � I PARKING FULL SIZE COMPACT PERCENTAGE PARKING FULL SIZE COMPACT PERCENTAGE O \ \`\ \ f ". .�1 111,41111 I II � �����i�. NEW INTERIOR LANDSCAPING OMSION STALL STALL COMPACT DIVISION STALL STALL COMPACT N I L1 9.399 B.Sa16 STALL 9.0,00 9.5916 STALLS �\\ �`\• \� ,` I• I I� NEW CONSTRUCTION BOUNDRY 1 399 0 0 3 12 0 0 O \\ V\ \`�r \\\ - I ' I \� d -- - SECURITY FENCING 2 227 0 0 4 266 310 53.8 • 6O ---- r� \ \ ` Y \ \: ' 'mill r� TOTAL 626 0 0 5 696 309 30.7 SCALE IN FEET `, 1 \\ \ \ 0• I 1 I I,II i I 1 II` E%ISTINC SIGN $GATE 1••60' v \ I \ \ ••'••• I 1 it t 1 �=- * NEW 40'TALL POLE W/4 UGHTS 01 400W EACH 6 240 216 47.3 7 52 0 0 \` . \( 1,i-I• I,' I I I I I I y Ex15PNG LIGHT STANDARD TOTAL 1266 635 39.7 ��� \ \ \\ �1 I1 I'I I I I I I I d I EXISTING STREET UGHT STANDARD OVERALL PARKING STALL COUNT = 2727 PLANNING SUBMITTAL Q EXISTING LANDSCAPING ALL HANDICAP ANO CARPOOL STALLS ARE LOCATED NODE THE B00NG PUNT IN CLOSE PROWMIIT TO WOIO(AREAS ry EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT Harris Group Inc. A NEW FIRE HYDRANT 99-10629 FH 9Bmi or WnnMA mN 9w m® 9r /MPG WS ACCEPTABILITY ?^IM48mM 161199 °'°��� SITE PLAN 991099• Ire 0 10.15.99 M• RAMC PW91 MO/re ILLI]99 ,���.,,,,//// c ...PP 411.99 gLBLPL,AIGW 19 COMER 1Q1199 T°i PROPOSED PMKJBG LOT 39 ^1 oo �6 i ffll n ' 161199 RENTON SITE �/ D CML OSTER RFNTON �� SQUARE TICS k VERED IS \ (\ (\A w � � n\`A • • — -r n FOOTAGE F SITE 70 a. \ " 4 \ 6• 0 ""t �\v1XW" �\\\\\X " "� \\O" "\va % .: Ir tnTmTrnirnlrnTr • -1," AYG o " %` •%om � \\\\\\ \\\\ �\8PAVEDSURFACE ONEW WRONG665.10 V •. \ � V• \\ V•• \\\\\ y`\TC\ \\\ 1 OACLENTAG OGF S9C1UEARCEO FOOTAGBEYBMC 6. 0 ; \• T �13\ \T\�`\\\ \\\0µ \\\ " ``\ ' / Itifi 11111.1.1 I I `\\ /iAREA CF NEAR MOK RIME SETBACKS 730.165 �AREA OF NEW INTERIOR LANDSCAPING 36.585 \ Y�\ T\ \,` W � \\ ` I ®i iII1 11I 1 I I PERCENTAGE OF INTERIOR LANDSCAPING x \\\ `j\� \\ i � IIII V I II II III\\ r\ " � 0%\\�\ `AREA OF SETBAK LANDSCAPING 53.763 ✓\\\\\.\ < \01.\\ \ \\\ \ 4 i lll 'Uri IIII' II Ill III\\\� \\ \ a \\�� \ \ ` \\\ \\\ \ \� \ \ �'. :I\ � \ `Q \ I. ii. IP-up-AR r i\I III. . .1 . . . . \ \ 0,- \\ \\ \\\ ` \011-\ 7 \\ `1" � .\\\\ �\).`"\—\\`"\ ``"\\ \\- \ /' I\\ \� \�\ ` \� �\\ \\ y\ \\ eIily_y_rrirrrrrrrrr ►Ir rrrrrrrrrrrrrr III\" \ � \ \ \`%\00\ \\ \1 \\\\\ 0- \ ' `\ � I L Li .�LL..—D LL.a.l .LLLL- L ,\ \ \ \'3cc`"\\\\\\\\\\` tR` ,,�'' =:_ \l�� rilin ill 1 I u ..... I I I l I I I. �y�1�1J111111J W i III.1J1 I r y r__'4-1 2.. 17. . A , _..., 8 ', -lig ��` ... ` ril , _ �1ltititititititi�rrrtf�tllttitiltititil�rr� 61.:I, _. -* 1.1 ...- ..._.,.. \ R;�. =-fl== -1_=1= "a4\k\% ��� %ft i\ Al I. -1;1L ,, �;� � �a D Ottt(((fllllllllltttttti(((fllllllo mil k• , • \ % A . 8ifltitititi'�I'l�rr_f Htllltitititi'���r�r8 \' \\\\'\ �... �t•\ ` \• _1= i \ �\` I II II II 1 IIIII II II II To-I IO II II II II IIIII II II II i F.�. �; \ , �: -1= 4414 \ t CHILLER _ Ottt((fllllllllltttttt(((((IllN 9P \ \1 \ . , \\� S, t i i ` ANNEX _ IF 1 1 I I 1 • • l�� r lt( l J11J ll 11 J \�• `��\\\\\\��:N. ; <� ®\ � �® _..cot ANNEX _1-1 ..4.11 IF Illllll0-1114 Illlllll i" 'i' • � b I Y \•s \ `\\` oi \•\ l��N., \ �!.''!! �:^�o::+�11 II 1 1 o- is, . I \ .\ ` .`mow0�00 - � :,Idu ua —p r--�1_.L LIl_I 5ItJ_L J—Li1J—LJ—1—L� ' _ _ __ •____ ---- ► —_ - �_ \ I �s __y. _ N I o0O0O �� I ' I IT T^A^7Ty—I�1 t J \\ 88 71 -:1—u—Y,• -\ �f`_t_ r c_=�- = r_. ... .9 Id4 � \ \\ \� 'ems II i n i I LEGEND r�T1\ • It I I IIIr 2 \ \\ \\ \ I�. II I ® PARKING DMSION 1 I \\, \ AJ I�1 �, I NEW SETBACK LANDSCAPING EXISTING PARKING NEW PARKING o I ! E::.1 O \ \\ ` ,�. �•� PARKING FULL SIZE COMPACT PERCENTAGE PARKING FULL 512E COMPACT PERCENTAGE \ `` \E�` T4,,r� 1 III�` I 11 I,� [] NEW INTERIOR LANDSCAPING DMSION STALL STALL COMPACT DMSION STALL STALL COMPACT \ ` I ►L 9.0420 6.5:16 STALL 9.0420 B.5416 STALLS �///yy{�V�\\ \\ \\ . c .�- 1. I NEW CONSTRUCTION BOUNORY 1 }9g 0 0 3 12 0 0 (`'^`\\ 4 \\\ \ a\'`\`,r \\•. I I'" 1(�� - SECURITY FENCING TOTAL _ 626 0 0 5 696 J09 30.7 SCALE IN FEET `- \ \` Y \• III i I I III I I �` DIMING SIGN - — - - 6 210 216 47.3 �1.60 v \ \ t \ I l� i'Rill-l- wt NEW 40'TALL POLE W/4 UCH S®400W EACH ` 7 52 0 0 \ ` ,\\� ,, , �1' I,, I I I I I I 227 EXISTING LIGHT STANDARD TOTAL 1266 B35 39.7 a B ' �\ `\ \ �.1 I t I I I III I I I L3 I DUSTING STREET LGHT STANDARD OVERALL PARKING STALL COUNT = 2727 PLANNING SUBMITTAL is CD EXISTING LANDSCAPING ALL HANDICAP AND CARPOOL STALLS ARE LOCATED NSOE ME BOFING PLANT IN aS0 PROAIOTY TO WOW AREAS Pa EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT Harris Group Inc. Mni NEW FIRE HYDRANT 99-10629 1 NM aAC POW om HIVM .wvm ACCEPTAeNn r:uMRlook .$lxw fLY'o• m Win �• w.�m °u` S = SITE PLAN .991089 0 10.15.99 ,,.,,(( �• ��// 0.WiWFA 0.1199 _ArAwA�G .w n n nrz W a1m a1199 PROPOSED PARKING LOT 3B C 1 00 1 R. A 'al"' RENTON SITE a �/ r Ar.w.m CML VASTER RENTON0 . ,a 0 CITY OF F __al TON ..IL Planning/Building/Public Works e-a '‘ - \ 7109A-97‘14 .a. 0 SI i al S , 0./.911 kg -. D 3 0 5 .: 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 mi- . uu ca , m= - * , o. sT., ,, ,,,, PB MIZTER * ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED --...t...-sf---- 7204260! U.5. POSiAGE I ,*•;:,:;=-;-? ,• , p. ___________ _ __ ___ __ __ ___ ______ --, PACI I G3 COM:POANY ----- 5 1-2452 • PO B ; .326 - ;" • Tc., ' REN ' N WA -- — 98055 - - - -_ "7•1617i)Ell,tti.‘i,Ekiliiiiit A'§,' iiE6,11;111:AECLE1171q•FOIZIAAR1- :' NPfs,pc:H:#:!-'-f,i.-'e'NErpmpTox:Npj KNQWN,,,- -1' ,F FD 11NI,IIVE10ENTTODRES$;•-;:',,:MOVED:1,471NQ'.; D LikgSS','-'-. ' • I it WW1 Ili tit itttifirt iit i i k i II 1 i i i i 1 . ig'l .- '---- •--=-'-- DECEASEIS'i.P.,L,UNCLAIMED,4141 , VAagl,..'IPIry.;IWR-R-ERITCIFEW:771*--f77. li'l ,z;FE-,''T-'' r-- . • 0F� ' 4,6‘ -'11 /it 11/....\lib, ID........... n li cA, _Q .-'4‘ 4:144414:\I '--- i11�. �1,..'.,:" ©.n ..��d 6 j1 ��\ PAW@IO LOT BtfE' 4.111 k S 7 J�1i� IIE. 1;1 z619r�' i;0o �►� ' �� A� .. ,.! 01,, 4,,il iitor- i , - �: lIN4 ,.3:. .t:Iii) ;Iv \ PLANNING SUBMITTAL I . PIAN Nq O Nmb Qotq IA. x uomaommum, r 0.._._ - - - ®oEivo' 1 --- NI 1 082305-9168-09 KELLER SUPPLY CO. 925 Houser Way N. RENTON, WA 98055 082305-9190-01 AERO-PLASTICS INC. 903 HOUSER WAY N. RENTON, WA 98055 --- -_J-1- - N\-- - . .k . IH PJGHSTOIroD1AONIER, ' 1 8 U,GET ___ - __ -----,_ ---\---,---2:-6------->,-"' ,../i IH _.‘. ,Ailif 1.01 ,i r• Zur,...; Ma 1:SitAr .'' •-•111.23 6 EXISTING PARKING LOT TO REMAIN . T A •. 1 rto ,._.„11;50131-744#1.11.4,3•••;•%•i- Lo 0 04 40 0; H '1111 4 , ,, tig 2 riF, pAE wR K IBNIDGE ILN0G7 • 1 P .../.1- 1 attkir 1 7 'i9t- VII d %ft.- N • li \-31,11: 4-03 0 LO TO RELINN 5-4 1 /s I.)... 9 -1107., ,2.,6. ; -:-----2,- -r: mi,„„ri cs or if ., . 1 .. 1 .. IN S, r i Efr BSI'RNLROAD I... . L - —trie....ii .4,1 II. : 7 :_,,... :1:,ii,„,:,_,...,i,xo„,c0 , c00, i . . 11 ,vm/ ÷,ii, _k_,PA,.W'i A,I. _ I,,„6,3,- f. 1 51-:.UBLIC/ . j.-1-L ligi lf 11 -11"— If --—w-'="-•— — El (7)1. El .,.' . 0 n NU .=r�nv^. ^•r% nRr-.=�r� �rs�fis•. COMMENTS ' S q,1455, A . .....r a��..r,k,o-k�..n•,a. sa e.,tk,d.a � ,e.aa+.a.,e. s.a.s tta.ar,e.x 082305-9026-01 BURLINGTON NORTHRN SANTA FE715175 - TAX DEPT 1700 E GOLF RD 4400 SCHAUMBURG IL 60173 • 032305-9033-02 BURLINGTON NORTHRN SANTA FE715175 TAX DEPT 1700 E GOLF RD 4400 SCHAUMBURG IL 60173 082305-9079-07 THE BOEiNG COMPANY 650035 PO BOX 3703 M/S 41F-09 SEATTLE WA 98124 082305-9152-07 THE BOEING COMPANY 650035 PO BOX 3703 M/S 41F-09 SEATTLE WA 98124 082305-9165-02 THE bOEING COMPANY 650035 PO BOX 3703 M/S #1F-09 SEATTLE WA 98124 082305-9167-00, HEISER INDUSTRIAL TOOLING 913124 919 HOUSER WAY N RENTON WA 98055 VVG3VJ-71 (z7-QJ( PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC 790503 PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 90863 BELLEVUE WA 98009 ' 082305-9190-01 AURORA ACRES INC 352479 PO BOX 15236 SEATTLE WA 96115 082305-9191-00 PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC 929800 PROPERTY TAX DEPT • P 0 BOX 90868 BELLEVUE WA 98009 082305-9193-06 THE BOEING COMPANY 650035 PO BOX 3703 .MIS 11F-09 SEATTLE WA 98124 HOWARD ENTERPRISES INC 152047 • ATTN LAUR I E HCG I BB0N PO BOX 79014 SEATTLE WA 98119 082305-9170-05 PACCAR INC 301304 ATTN: CORP ACCOUNTING PC BOIX 1518 BELLEVUE WA 98009 082305-9171-04 THE BOEING COMPANY 650035 . PO BOX 3703 M/S 111F-09 SEATTLE WA 98124 082305-9176-,09 PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC 790503 PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 90868 BELLEVUE WA 98009 THE BOEING COMPANY 650035 PO BOX 3703 M/S t1F-09 SEATTLE WA 98124 082305-9198-03 PACIFIC AGRO COMPOANY 512452 PO BOX 326 RENTON WA 96055 082305-9205-04 .THE BOEING COMPANY 650035 PO BOX 3703 MIS 41F-09 SEATTLE WA 98124 ::::4 PACCAR INC 301304 ATTN: CORP ACCOUNTING 72:30008-0:0 BELLEVUE WA 98009 722300-0105-00 THE BOEING COMPANY 650035 . PO BOX 3703 M/S t1F-09 SEATTLE WA 98124 •. - CITEF RENTON •• ... Planning/Building/Public Works Department 7 e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator kylti April 27,2000 • CITY OF RENTON Mr.L.M.Babich III Environmental Affairs Manager APR 2 8 MOO The Boeing Company P.O. Box 3707,MS 63-41 RECEIVED Seattle,WA 98124-2207 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE SUBJECT: BOEING PARKING LOT 3B STORM WATER CODE MODIFICATION APPROVAL(LUA-99-155,SA-H,ECF) Dear Mr.Babich: The City of Renton approves the Boeing Parking Lot 3B storm water code modification request with conditions. We find that the proposed code modification meets the decision criteria for Modifications required by City Code (RMC 4-9-250(d)). The code modification request is to provide storm water treatment through the use of monthly parking lot sweeping utilizing special street sweeper equipment; more frequent storm system maintenance/inspection; and the use of coalescing plate oil/water separators. The approval of the code modification is based upon the information submitted by the Boeing Company on January 27,2000,and presented by the Boeing Company at our April 24,2000,meeting. The code modification was determined to meet the decision criteria since the proposal was.to provide 80% Total Suspended Solids(TSS)removal. The proposal is to provide storm water treatment for 19.45 acres of the site,which is an area that is approximately 150% larger than the area required to be treated according to the provisions of the City's current code. In approving the code modification, the City also recognizes that the Boeing Company has dedicated resources to ensure that the increased maintenance and inspection will be performed as required by the Boeing Renton Plant's National Pollution Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)permit. The Code Modification request is approved with the following conditions: 1. A minimum of 19.45 acres of the Boeing Parking Lot 3B shall receive storm water treatment. The storm water treatment shall be achieved by the following methods: 2. Parking Lot Sweeping: Parking lot sweeping shall be performed monthly through the use of an Elgin Regenerative Sweeper or Schwarze EV Sweeper only. Should the Boeing Company wish to use a different model of sweeper in the coming years, use of the new sweeper shall be subject to written approval of the City of Renton. 3. Catch Basin Maintenance and Inspection: All catch basins in the 19.45 acres of Boeing Parking Lot 3B shall be inspected annually. When catch basin sumps have become 30%filled (depth of sediment equal to 0.3 times the distance between the bottom of the catch basin and the invert of the catch basin) 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer Mr. Babich,Parking Lot _storm Water System. April 27,2000 Page 2 • with accumulated sediment, the catch basin sumps shall be cleaned out through the use of a vactor truck or other acceptable storm system cleaning methods. Standard WSDOT Type I and Type II catch basins shall be used in the construction of the parking lot storm system. 4. Coalescing Plate Oil/Water Separators: A minimum of three(3) coalescing plate oil/water separators shall be installed to treat 19.45 acres of the Boeing Parking Lot 3B as proposed. 5. The coalescing plate oil/water separators shall be designed to treat the runoff from the water quality storms for basins 11, 12 and 13'equal to 1.20 cfs, 1.01 cfs and 1.48 cfs,respectively as proposed. 6. The coalescing plate oil/water separators shall be Facet International, Inc., Mpaks Coalescing Plate Oil/Water Separators or equal and shall be sized based upon the assumption that a maximum of 66% of the washed off sediment will be removed via the separators. 7. The coalescing plate oil/water separators shall be inspected monthly or immediately following any large spill on the site. 8. The coalescing plate oil/water separators shall be maintained (cleaned) quarterly.(every three months)or whenever one of the following conditions exist,whichever occurs first: If there is: 1) One(1)inch of free floating oil;or 2) Six(6)inches of sludge in the bottom of the separator;or 3) Sludge in the plate pack: 9. Inspection/Maintenance Report The Boeing Company shall submit a report annually to the City that summarizes the monthly.inspections. and sweeping that was performed. -The report shall include results of the inspections(depth of sediment in catch basin sumps,and,depths of oil and sludge in the coalescing plate oil/water separators) and note when maintenance (sweeping and cleaning) has been performed. The report shall include. documentation from any vendors (sweeper, vactor truck operators) contracted to perform the sweeping and/or cleaning the catch basins and coalescing plate oil/water separators. Such documentation shall be on the vendor's letterhead and shall briefly describe the work performed,the equipment used and the dates of work. 10. City Inspection: The City is authorized to enter the Boeing Parking Lot 3B site at any time and inspect the facilities to verify these conditions are being satisfied. 11. Penalty: If the Boeing Company demonstrates a persistent or repeated failure to comply with these conditions of the code modification, the City of Renton may require the Boeing Company to install additional storm water quality treatment facilities as required by City code in the Boeing Parking Lot 3B site. 12. Restrictive Covenant: A restrictive covenant shall be recorded against the Boeing Parking Lot 3B property that lists the above conditions as restrictions against the property. The restrictive covenant shall also provide that in lieu of performing the above conditions, any future owner of the Boeing Parking Lot 3B site may modify the site storm system as outlined in item#11 above. H:\DIVISION.S\UTILITIE.S\DOCS\2000-194.doc\RIS\cor Mr.Babich,Parking Lot 3B Siva : :Water System April 27,2000 Page 3 Please notify me if you disagree with the conditions associated with the requested storm water code modification for the Boeing Parking Lot 3B. We will proceed with completing the project construction plan review hand issuance of the construction permit if the code modification conditions are acceptable. The construction permit will include a provision requiring the restrictive covenant to be recorded prior to completion of construction. Thank you. Sincerely, 4 eq /�Welg(c(%e1 l � Gregg Zimmerman,P.E.,Administrator Planning/Building/Public Works cc: City ClerksOffice) Lys Hornsby , Jana Hanson • Jack Cmmley Neil Watts • H:\DIVISION.S\UTILITIE.S\DOCS\2000-194.doc\RJS\cor ar; , f CIT OF RENTON Hearing Examiner Jesse Tanner,Mayor Fred J.Kaufman February 24, 2000 Mr. Rick Ford The Boeing Company P.O. Box 3707, MS 19-35 Seattle„WA 98124 Re: BOEING PARKING LOT - FILE No. LUA99-155,SA-H Dear Mr. Ford: The Examiner's Report and Decision on the above referenced matter, which was issued on January 20 2000, was not appealed within the 14-day period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is considered final by this office and the file on your application is being triansmitted to the City Clerk as of this date. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, ,cIV i - Fred J. Kaufm Hearing Examiner FJK/mm cc: Leslie Nishihira. Sandi Seeger,Development Services. 1055 South Grady Way- Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6515 ©.- - - ---. - ---" • AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. County of King ) MARILYN MOSES ,being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 20th day of January ,2000, affiant deposited in the mail of the United States a sealed envelope(s) containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Signature: C14/Cr c.�.�,,.‘ 1C . !� L �f SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this o day of c. 6 ) , 2000. L-MINAkap‘ Vp0Vnick_ c:>�� ‘ Notary Public i d for t e State of Washit gtori,., 011 Elq 'A ~� residingat Q,therein. = `� ' `'-1"° V3 0 bid N :et„ Application, Petition, or Case No.: BOEING PARKING LOT '441 `t`4e% LUA99-155-SA-H The Decision or Recommendation contains a complete list of the Parties of Record i HEARING EXAMINER'S REPORT January 20,2000 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION APPLICANT: The Boeing Company Boeing Parking Lot File No.: LUA-99-155,SA-H LOCATION: NE Corner of Park Avenue N and N 8th Street SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To develop a 2,101 stall parking lot on 22.45 acre site for employee parking SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on January 5,2000 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area;the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the January 11,2000 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday,January 11,2000, at 9:50 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Vicinity map application,proof of posting,proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: Site plan Exhibit No.4: Landscape plan Exhibit No. 5: [Zoning Map The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by LESLIE NISHIHIRA,Project Manager, Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way,Renton,Washington 98055. The applicant is proposing a 2,101 stall parking lot for use by employees of the Boeing Renton plant. The site is 22.45 acres and is designated Heavy Industrial zone on the north portion and Commercial Office on the south portion. Boeing buildings 10-60 and 10-65 located on the site have been approved for demolition. The completed parking area would consist of the proposed 2,101 stalls and 626 existing stalls north and southeast of the site,for a combined total of 2,727 stalls. Lot 6 located east of the subject site will be decommissioned after completion of the The Boeing Company Boeing Parking Lot File No.: LUA-99-155,SA-H January 20,2000 Page 2 subject proposal The project includes 879,510 square feet of paving with 90,368 feet of landscaping with irrigation throughout the interior and exterior of the site. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC) issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the project. The Comprehensive Plan(CP)designation for the site is Employment Area Industrial and Employment Area Office. The proposal conforms with each of these designations,as well as the zoning development standards such as landscape requirements and parking regulations. The landscape plan indicates shrubs and trees proposed,but does not specify the types or sizes. As a condition of approval, staff recommends that applicant revise the landscape plan to specify specie types and sizes for the shrubs proposed. Parking lots over 10,000 square feet in sine are required to provide a minimum of 5 percent area within the interior of the lot in a pattern that reduces the barren appearance of the lot. The proposal indicates less than that, and staff is recommending that the applicant revise the landscape plan to provide a minimum of 5 percent of interior landscaping,and to provide adequate plantings within these areas to reduce visual impact. The landscape plan indicates columnar English Oaks along the site's Park and Garden Avenue Street frontages. These trees are capable of reaching heights of 45 to 60 feet,which is higher than street light standards, and would eventually prevent light from reaching the sidewalk areas near the lights. Staff is recommending revision of the landscape plan to substitute suitable street trees that would not hinder adequate lighting. The project includes five driveways to serve the parking area: one from NE 8th Street,two on Park Avenue, and two on Garden Avenue N. There is a Metro bus stop proposed on NE 8th. The majority of the proposal satisfies code requirements of stall width, depth and aisle dimensions,with the exception of substandard aisle width of 22 feet along the site's NE 8th frontage. Staff recommends a revision of the proposal to either revise the site plan to provide the 24-foot aisle width, eliminate the stalls with substandard back-out distances, or obtain a parking modification. As part of the proposal a number of catch basins would be added to the site that would connect to existing points of discharge. Storm water is proposed to receive treatment through oil/water separators at each discharge point before being released into the City's storm water system. Because the proposal converts impervious surface from rooftop to parking lot,the applicant is also required to provide a biofiltration and wet vault or an oversized wet vault. Staff is recommending approval of the Boeing parking lot, subject to the following conditions: (1) the applicant revise the landscpe plan to incorporate the specific types of shrubs,provide a minimum of 5% interior landscaping,provide adequate plantings in the interior landscaping, substitute proposed trees with suitable street trees; (2) to resolve the substandard aisle width on N 8th Street frontage, applicant shall revise the site plan to provide the required 24 foot width,eliminate the stalls with substandard back-out distances,or obtain approval of a parking modification. Rick Ford,The Boeing Company,P.O.Box 3707,MS 19-35, Seattle,Washington 98124, applicant • representative herein, agreed to submit corrected landscape plans to meet the City's recommendations. Regarding the substandard aisle width,the applicant proposed to eliminate the stalls or make some other adjustment to comply. Applicant is also in discussions with the City's Public Works Department regarding compliance with the storm water treatment requirements. Neil Watts,Plan Review Supervisor,Development Services Division,City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton,Washington 98055,responded that the storm water lines in this area are 5 to 6 feet deep. He further described the storm water treatment options being discussed. The Boeing Company Boeing Parking Lot File No.: LUA-99-155,SA-H January 20,2000 Page 3 The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 10:15 a.m. FINDINGS,CONCLUSIONS&DECISION Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant,The Boeing Company,filed a request for approval of a Site Plan for an approximately 2,101-stall parking lot. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance(DNS)for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located northeast of the intersection of Park Avenue North and North 8th Street. The parcel is bounded by Park on the west, 8th on the south and Garden Avenue North on the east. Since Park curves to the east, it intersects with Garden north of the subject site. 6. The subject site is located north of the downtown area of the City of Renton. 7. The parcel is approximately 22.45 acres. The parcel is irregularly shaped. The parcel is approximately 1,380 feet long(north to south)by approximately 750 feet wide. The subject site is widest in the middle and narrows at the north and south ends of the subject site. 8. The entire block encompasses both the subject site and two other Boeing parking lots located at the north end of the block and at the southeast corner of the block. 9. Two buildings that were on the subject site were recently demolished. An approximately 8,140 square foot utility building along Park and sky bridge over Park will be retained. 10. The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 1793 enacted in September 1959. 11. The subject site straddles two zoning districts. The north,approximately two-thirds of site is zoned IH (Heavy]ndustry). The remaining southern one-third is zoned CO(Commercial Office). 12. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable Iror the development of employment generating uses,but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 13. Two main east-west access driveways that would run from Park across to Garden would divide the parking lot into three sections. The north-south driveway from 8th would divide the southernmost section into two subsections. On the west,the north driveway would line up with a signalized The Boeing Company - Boeing Parking Lot File No.: LUA-99-155,SA-H January 20,2000 Page 4 intersection at N 10th Street. The second driveway would be approximately 400 feet north of N 8th. The drivleway to N 8th is located about mid-block. It would have a Metro Bus pullout and bus stop in the driveway,north of N 8th. 14. For the riost part,the parking stalls will be arrayed on either side of eight main, long north to south aislewaylIs. There would be some narrow planters located in the interior of the large central parking area and a fe'v planters at some angled intersections within the central area. 15. Staff has noted that the proposal does not meet the current standards calling for five percent(5%) interior landscaping or approximately 43,976 square feet for the proposed 879,510 square foot lot. The applicant agreed to provide the necessary landscaping and absorb the lost stalls. 16. The south tier of parking stalls along N 8th do not meet the required 24-foot aisle width to accommodate backing maneuvers. The aisle width is 22 feet. Staff recommended some solutions but the applicant agreed to accommodate the proper aisle width or eliminate the substandard parking stalls. 17. Code requires a 20 foot landscape strip between IH properties and arterial streets such as Park and a 15 foot strip along non-arterial streets such as Garden. The proposal complies with both of these requirements. The applicant has street trees and shrubs but has not specified the type. Staff requires the type. 18. The CO zone requires 10 feet of street landscaping except where adjacent to office or commercial where 15 feet is required. The applicant proposes maintaining the existing 20 feet along N 8th and providing the required 10 feet along Park. 19. The street trees proposed by the applicant, Columnar English Oak,may be too tall and interfere with street lighting. Staff has recommended that applicant provide an alternative tree type. 19. Staff attempted to calculate the amount of parking that the applicant currently has and what is required for the various uses the applicant serves from the proposed and existing lots. With the recent demolition, change of use and elimination of another parking lot east of the subject site,the range for parking is between 9,714 and 14,033 stalls. The proposed parking complement with the new lot will be 12,810 parking spaces. 20. The parking lot has interior pedestrian walkways. There are connections to the covered walkways that already serve the applicant's sites in this area. 21. The site is located approximately 2,500 feet from Lake Washington and approximately 1,200 feet from the Cedar River. Construction impacts will be prevented by erosion control features and silt traps. The project has been designed to meet Department of Ecology requirements. 22. While the site is located in three drainage basins they ultimately feed one system located in Garden Avenue. Staff has noted that the amount of impervious surface will not substantially change but relatively clean rooftop drainage will be replaced by surfaces serving automobiles, a pollution source. The project requires biofiltration and a wet vault. Coalescing plate oil/water separators are not sufficient. Staff has proposed alternatives including an oversized vault. The applicant has Federal and State discharge permits. The Boeing Company Boeing Parking 4,ot File No.: LUA-99-155,SA-H January 20,2000 Page 5 CONCLUSIONS: 1. The siteplan ordinance provides a number of specific criteria for reviewing a site plan. Those criteria are generally represented in part by the following enumeration: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; b. Conformance with the Building and Zoning Codes; c. Mitigation of impacts on surrounding properties and uses; d. Mitigation of the impacts of the proposal on the subject site itself; e. Conservation of property values; f. Provision for safe and efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation; g. Provision of adequate light and air; h. kdequacy of public services to accommodate the proposed use; The proposed use satisfies these and other particulars of the ordinance. 2. It is clearly debatable as to whether utilizing over 20 acres of prime industrial property for parking is an employment generating use as envisioned by the Comprehensive Plan. Clearly,a parking structure or structures taking up a lot less room would allow the remaining land to be used for uses which generate jobs,the prime objective of the Comprehensive Plan for this IH property. By the same token, a complex the size of the Boeing plant generates a large employee load and a commensurate parking demand. While it would appear that a less wasteful method of providing that parking might be possible,the use is part of a principle use that does generate additional jobs. 3. The proposed parking lot meets the appropriate landscaping setbacks but does not meet the specificity for planting materials. It also does not provide adequate interior landscaping. The applicant has agreed to provide the additional landscaping. Certain of the selected tree species may be too tall and obscure street lighting, creating safety issues. The applicant will have to provide a species that the City fmds appropriate. 4. The southernmost tier of stalls does not provide appropriate dimensions for safe backing maneuvers. The applicant has agreed to meet code and remove the offending stalls if necessary. 5. The parking will be well-screened and landscaped and should not adversely affect neighboring property. There will be construction noise but that should not last. A parking area with that many stalls will probably add to air pollution,but since it replaces an existing lot just east,there should be no net change, although that is not necessarily a positive comparison. 6. Runoff om the paved areas will be treated and meet code requirements before passing to natural water bodies. 7. A large parking area will probably not have much impact on property values. Clearly, its low profile The Boeing Company Boeing Parking Lot File No.: LUA-99-155,SA-H January 20,2000 Page 6 nature will allow light and air to enter adjoining properties which might enhance property values. 8. The lots appear to have reasonable circulation patterns. There are large driveways to expedite ingress and egress. There are long aisleways limiting intersections and cross traffic within the lot. There are interior pedestrian pathways. These connect to covered walkways. Finally,there is an on-site Metro bus stop removing a bus stop from a public street. 9. The public storm water system should be able to handle storm flows from the site. The applicant possesses appropriate permits. 10. In conclusion, a large parking lot is not the most gracious use of land nor the most employment generating use,but is permitted as an accessory to the existing complex. DECISION: The site lan is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to incorporate the following requirements: (a) Specify the species types proposed for the"shrubs"; (b) Provide a minimum of 5%of the parking area as interior landscaping; (c) Propose adequate plantings(trees, shrubs,etc., in varying heights)in the interior of the lot to reduce visual impacts; and (d) Substitute the proposed English Oak trees with a suitable street tree that will not hinder the provision of adequate lighting to the site. The satisfaction of these requirements will be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of construction permits. 2: In order to resolve the substandard aisle width proposed for a portion of the site's North 8th Street frontage,the applicant shall complete one of the following: (a) Revise the site plan to provide the 24-foot aisle width required pursuant to RMC section 4-4-080F9b; (b) Eliminate the stalls with substandard back-out distances; or (c) Obtain approval of a parking modification request in order to provide less than the minimum aisle width required. The satisfaction of this requirement will be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of construction permits. 3. The applicant shall provide appropriate water quality facilities and appropriately sized detention facilities,subject to review and approval of Development Services Division. ORDERED THIS 20th day of January 2000. FRED J.KAU 4 HEARING EXAMINER The Boeing Company -. Boeing Parking Lot File No.: LUA-99-155,SA-H January 20,200 Page 7 TRANSMITTED THIS 20th day of January, 2000 to the parties of record: Leslie Nishihira Rick Ford Neil Watts 1055 S Grady Way P.O.Box 3707,MS 19-35 1055 S Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 Seattle, WA 98124 Renton,WA 98055 TRANSMITTED THIS 20th day of January,2000 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman,Plan/Bldg/PW Admin. Members,Renton Planning Commission Jana Hanson,Development Services Director Chuck Duffy,Fire Marshal Sue Carlson,Econ. Dev.Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Larry Meckling,Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler South County Journal Betty Nokes,Economic Development Director Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m.,February 3,2000. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or fact,error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14)days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant,and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV,Chapter 8, Section 16,which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department,first floor of City Hall. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. 065 ".'1 PgToXuALPOR I ,--A \j---- _-:: ter: , ,,;; 1� \ IH ,,, „, 1 t I I 'l' Q . r i(* 1 a r_p 1tl i' ��.�Iy 'r Toos�vu+Kcc for co V „,!,. ..-„artigtost,„ .. 0 , . ta. -. I .li• ' 'G:� 1 i 4044 {e'jejt'r + �� L % o 1.-. 1• -" jT-re NEW BOEING ��� M•t t_Nre\ J ,�'b _ //III ® PARKING LOT SITE ur m_ ' ifo C PARKING l01 1 ;Vat _ ,.., l__ Eijili "JJ II u C REMALY . � ��• 1\ �-Of�L•�._a.—�.- ~ rr-_'r- �- �^ 8M51 WNW lall D ., . L___. • .( .. . [-- ij x 1 • n a' -- - o..r� _S o 0 IH b 1 :. 0 , \ -,70''',r ,.,.;° f., --k° I'F-WL ICAD it —en,,,R r — • - }} 07` ) � NII f } ?-.J Neighborhood Detail Map ' I '[[_1 �i'� 1H A = L_ L-s _- �p a r �- r ' ,,N. Zs 11 . . .111 a4"j ,I1'000_ 11)i%L_1_. I IIw Zsl.ull. i. i i1.. • . i. • • . f • I ' I A , . j : I SQUARE FOOTAGE STATISTICS \\RtY"(\\\t`•• \\\ t..•.tt t."' t" ` t'• k�sE t.•' - °®" •TOTAL SQUARE P FOOTAGE OOOQ OF OF PARKING 978,015 y`�. �1" \1\\\\ \\\\1\"\ ""\\\\\1�\\`)14\"CC" `n\1t A VO"" `\\ \\\ 1`1\\\\t`"�\\ /��--y T --- '�,Nr I " � \\ \\� \� i� � ,.• - , 4 4 4 1 1ff1i�f1T�f11ffllffll�fllflr'—I, TOTAL PAYED smut or NEW PARIONG 665,Aw t 11100........00, tt\\ \\\\ \tt\\\� \\\\ ttt\\ \\\ \OC\C‘"\\‘‘ \\\\ 1\\ i% • 1ATOTAL BUIDNc SryJARE i00IAfS alwm\1\\\` �•( \\\\\\ \`'t,]`;{•t(�\\\\\\ 11r' I1J,,J',J'W 0 , ,PFRmITAIX OF STE 0:NERED Br BOum 0.61K ,It,,. ` tt1\..r\\ t`� tRt\1, ,,\,•`\ t1t\ " i- d I 1�I��'I . \ 11"1--" I iAEA CF WI RCM NSXC SETBACKS 770.16s \t C\t1N `1tt (Rt` • I i 1 n I 1 E I E I P1 1 i AREA CF NEW NTEWOR LANDSCAPING 36,565 ,�`L`�\\ \\0,�``` ,`y PERQNTACZ OF NIFI6OR LANDSCAPING ss \� \\\�"`\,'� \\\ \\ 1 1\\1\\I t t -fie t I LI 11 I IIIII I ' ' I AREA CF SETBACI 1ANDSCAPINc ` s7765 V\1\\1;� r\\\1 11\\\\\"1�\\\\\\\\1\ 11\\\ �\\\1 _ I� 11 T I I III III I I 11(\1lt'•' 11111�v�'�\\t t\\\y3 I. ` X\\11\\� \\1\\ \\1\1�. 1\11 1 I IIIII IIIII II_IOIII IIIIIII III III I t t 11\\\`�\\\1ttt� 0.,.%1 r\\\\ttl\\ \\ \- 11\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\�\\�\\"\�\\\ V�i�s •• - • i t I I I I I I I' 'I :.111: \\1,\\�__., \\\ 100...�„\`�\\\1. \\1a..\\\ `\ \\U\s�\`\\\'\\„-- 6 `Q` I , IIIIIJ L L .I I ' a\ \1V.\--6 a\,``—'\\1``` \\\\"'\\\\•, /► e i :I I'17 PITfI'rarrI'rrri Il'I•Il' .rmi7TI'I Pfl I I \ • - 0. %.....\ \\\\\ \\\1 \\" 1`� tllII11.11.1 411JJJ.LLLI.LIJ. LLLI.LLLLIJ.1.11. 1 4 •I11\1\\\111%`1'1"-1-' 11\\\`t"\ \11\\1�\1c\c\t`t�\\\\\\` �; ��1\\�\\\\„ \\"t \ �\cRR` s `\\ Il,. LL .,,.,_ ,111'111. ' II Trr�'rr1 8� \ __ \ , \ ,\ t . 00 • ' i,..:.: ,!, • I III .1) 5 ' 1 .4(._ �_1=12. ti .. 81 tititititi�rrtf1r ftitirlrrr8� IIIIIIII l 1IIaI IIJIII llll(l ::. ``� �`R - �_� -I =1= IaR\R\ , e,Arg"4 r I -1 @ , I mill((Il�l�lllllllllf((I�Illlllo c- m r. ,C\ \ '$N,N5*. , ,N -7— y_ ,_ ,\� Ntt \` . p ltititititi'rrrrrrfr ftititititi'rrrrE \, \\\\j• \ �1 A�°\ \\ �� i -� 8 4 4 l A ,,,,, (((Illll l l l„,„,,„,, „„ IP' \ I z.) `�� ` icA,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,'= \ \ \\ �� N • i 1 ,\` �— II - `. 1. , \ • el al - 1._ I f tititititi4'rrlrr l titititititi'jr 'I \ `�\\ • �.*\� �• I IIM-11liiIW.JII III I I J — 11 c `\\\\� _i '.�` � _i _ .4!Z A C 1T+_ 1, 7 .immil �s 1 l��Mi.I,UUI %.` • `�.p��0?.\ _ � ,.,�1, - -m /V•Ull V ---------) ..... • -'�bas.. .f_E�ii_7-1 J.. -,�_,_ - ------_ ---_ - • . • 00000 ----,_ blb ' tern-r-rr-riA-I - -.f�'—'f^CC4C�1 rr -1 I-`� - .m= m `�, g I b f r J • \ 0 \e •A1 I I�� C_I] LEGEND �`1 1 r r=ri��1 G-�_► --T?� ///� \\ \ I�I n l-1 I I PARKING DM9N1N • 1 • \ \ I EXISTING PARKING NEW PARKING ,/ \ • 1t I 1 1 NEW SETBACK LANDSCAPING \ \ �" •2 C• _ e 14I 11[I PARKING FEEL SIZE COMPACT PERCENTAGE PARKING DIAL SIZE COMPACT PERCENTAGE O \ —\E\`'\�I' ,"_I-I`�I` L-.�f I-I1,,,� — NEW-01ltR10R-IANDSCNNNC -DMSION-—STALL——STALL COYPM7_ -DMSWN_—STAL SDALL -CSTALLS_ 0 \'\ I El 9.Oa20 e.341e STALL 9.0.20 8.3•le STALLS \• `P �,' I ..NEW CONSTRUCTION BOUNORY 1 .799 0 0 3 12 0 0 \ �• \`\ , \\\ I I 1k •--- - SECUi111Y FENCING 2 227 0 _ 0 4 266 CIO 5.7.e 'r 1Lp girmar `�\I� \ ♦ y \ \\• W` - EXISTING SIGN TOTAL 626 0 0 5 698 309 ,70.7 SCALE w Fir \ \ i•I II 6 240 216 a0 \\ 11 I W I Ir * NEW w TAU. POLL w/.UCHrS a wow EACH 7 52 0 0 0 • \ \`�\\ ♦ f�R• I I j/ mill e n COSTING UCM STANDARD TOTAL 1266 e]S 39.7 1 ) •-e EXISTING STREET tiGHT STANDARD �\\ \ \ • I I•I I I I I I I I O OVERALLTN AND CAPPIGGNEGTALSARLL STALL HISCE THE 5CONGG2727 PLANT PLANNING SUBMITTAL EXISTING LANDSCAPING IN CLOSE PROIDIOIA TO NOW AREAS 1,_. 'g EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT Harris GtO,q ,1, NEW FIRE HYDRANT la• 91-t9N9 • •AAAA o�y .,on as rn ou • won A,N • IC O BLN imam, i01111 SPE RAN 991051 � 0 I015.9P BO /A/cw• P�...a �Ane—.onK w` PAorostn rru/1e Em A9 �.'100 1.![�� --Mx—,A11T1 RENTON SITE o� 'a'o.---�St..,,TER REN1DN WM NOME ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: BOEING PARKING LOT PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-99-155,SA-H,ECF The Boeing Company is proposing the development of a 2,727-stall parking lot on a 22.45-acre site for existing company employees of the Boeing Renton Plant. Lot 6,which is currently utilized by employees,will be decommissioned after the completion of the proposed parking area. The subject property is zoned Heavy Industrial(IH)on the north Iwo-thirds of the site and Commercial Office(CO)on the south third. In addition to Environmental(SEPA)Review,the project is required to obtain Hearing Examiner Site Plan Approval. Location: NE corner of Park Avenue North and North 0"'Street. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed In writing on or before 5:00 PM January 3,2000. Appeals must be filed In writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B.Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)430-6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall,January 11,2000 at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Plan Approval. If the Environmental Determination Is appealed,the appeal willl be heard as part of this public hearing. ,,\ 71 rr•''''')" N U1 1 l QV/1 l/i�\ VAA\ gam„.•. AR NEVI IK010 !. 1 .n� Jos ItPARIOMSLOTMII °1- ' 11 . 0., R_J! ; pl L.,7_,_i ilki .'". R i ! �:. Y w011 (II � I I\ h . 2. -,--cnnllll FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION IPlease Include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. I CERTIFICATION ,jLrS I, tak i� lv.n,4 , hereby certify that copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on gent Vic..— 1 to, 11 Signed: -�,___— ATTEST: Subcribed and, worn before me,a Nortary Public, - or the State of Washington residing in - >-Lt,,� , on the d n c` day of t, (c i C/ MARILYN KAMCHEFF 1 � —�4-_� : NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON 4 COMMISSION EXPIRES MARILYN KAMCHEFF i i JUNE 29, 26t�3 MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 - , CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the /LQ day of (Decewv\kauv , 1999, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Okt_ dam( W \ \ documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Department of Ecology Don Hurter WSDOT KC Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher Washington Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman Department of Natural Resources Shirley Lukhang Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Indian Tribe Rod Malcom Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Joe Jainga Puget Sound Energy (Signature of Sender) SV- k e� STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 1- �� a S e - signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for theises and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: ) Z. 1 Z 21 (5 27 v- �r, Notary Public i and for the State of iP.shington MARILYN KAMCHEFF _ NOTARY PUBLIC Notary (Print) MARILYN KAMCHEFF STATE OF WASHINGTON My appointment eli(r@INTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNF 99 ?OO.. Projedt Name- 1 1DZ,N_Lk.n Lb Project Number: LUA °19 — 155 Sx-H , �L NOTARY.DOC AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Charlotte Ann Kassens first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETEMINATION 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON a daily newspaper published seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months Significance for the following protect under prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the BOEING PARKING LOT LUA-99-155,SA-H,ECF State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County Proposed development of a 22.45-acre site Journal (and not in supplemental form) which was regularly distributed to the subscribers for use Parkas a parking.N . lot.Location:8t :NE corn er of Ave.No.and No.8th St. during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a Appeals of the environmental determina- tion must be filed in writing on or before BoeingParkingLot 5:00 PM January 3, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing as published on: 12/20/99 Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$51.75, Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Athe aeal charged to Acct. No. 805106 . proclessal may be ion otbtained f oreardim the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)430-6510. Legal Number 6993 A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in al Clerk 0 h nt Journal the Council Chambers on the seventh floor egal y of City Hall, January 11, 2000 at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Plan Approval. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, Subscribed and sworn before me on this "_day of to.0 - 19(77 the appeal will be heard as part of this pub- lic hearing. Interested parties are invited to attend the public hearing. ccc_��� Published in the South County Journal o®oot`t49F C I l Ot" ��/r h/�.611... December 20,1999,6993 Y G, 1/4 e,���' Notary Public of the State of Washington F 2 Y toTapr �' ys residing in Renton _0_ = King County, Washington P %' � 6, ,Gee 44: q' —655 sf 1t life ® CITY OF ENTON INVOICE DATE ACCOUNT INVOICE CUSTOMER REF PAYMENT DUE FOR INFORMATION CALL 11/23/99 r10-0058 009484 12/28/99 PW- (425) 430-7262 THE BOEING CO Attn: Rick Ford PO BOX 3707 M/S 19-35 SEATTLE, WA 98124-2207 DESCRIPTION AMOUNT Environmental Review 500.00 Site Plan Approval 2,000.00 Postage Fees 13.86 Total amount due: 2,513.86 FORM3127 10/94 PLEASE REFERENCE INVOICE NUMBER WITH PAYMENT Finance Department • 200 Mill Ave. S. • Renton, Washington 98055 City of Renton PUBLIC Department of Planning/Building/Public Works HEARING PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Public Hearing Date: January 11, 2000 Project Name: Boeing Parking Lot CONCUT. "s.:CL Applicant/Owner The Boeing Company Address: P.O. Box 3707 DATE _LS'00 m/s 19-35 NAME r I;.e iJDATE Seattle, WA 98124 I,.M15tx[Ri3IW k►NIi•Sto Contact: Rick Ford iu is ittKY The Boeing Company =! l /I.S o0 (206) 655-9888 File Number: LUA-99-155, SA-H, ECF Project Manager: Lesley Nishihira (425)430-7270 Project Description: The Boeing Company is proposing the development of a 2,101-stall parking lot on a 22.45-acre site for employees of the Boeing Renton Plant. Lot 6, which is currently utilized by employees for parking, will be decommissioned after the completion of the proposed parking area. The subject property is zoned Heavy Industrial (IH) on the north two-thirds of the site and Commercial Office (CO) on the south third. Due to the number of parking stalls proposed, the project requires Hearing Examiner approval in addition to Environmental (SEPA) Review. Project Location: NE corner of Park Avenue North and North 8th Street 4v'':),„1----------' &LKM7 CDY rg PaM'vac" ', IH.....---V?------- --\_— -- ;1—,C,—-'' / c------ .--\k , ----\ \ ( . ` - 1 IH i� / v ;At /2G'tsyt\ ro ROAM ia TA ,'" 7.713V:*at: li it• 0 Ad,„v 3.,c1,-- la -, lit � :-� •� NEW BOEING ' i�� "e" tlwg% :ii 11111tooliklik0 PARKING LOT sr* '- .11 �.*O Vfli ''.•:.° .n c a -- 4 ��i , oamwc PAIOm6�r tii 00:: Q P►caw _ • 11 ; in il 111 t\ \I. •-M . , [1:iii ; . i '" ."' l'...4 11 t.. , CO 001 0 ,r7., r->7:----- --:----.V-71,e,. — 7 d4if.-411.4..1, 1 2 ,0=___ .., Z 1 '(1 N --t\ I 1 ' l I ( II Neighborhood Detail Map 1..I , �. _I IH )/ f[ )[ -p - -! i i1 i` . rr �i- , �<. l ii'i. • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-99-155,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: The Boeing Company PROJECT NAME: Boeing Parking Lot Project DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The Boeing Company is proposing the development of a 2,727-stall parking lot on a 22.45-acre site for existing company employees of the Boeing Renton Plant. Lot 6, which is currently utilized by employees, will be decommissioned after the completion of the proposed parking area. The subject property is zoned Heavy Industrial (IH)on the north two-thirds of the site and Commercial Office (CO)on the south third. In addition to Environmental (SEPA) Review, the project is required to obtain Hearing Examiner Site Plan Approval. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: NE corner of Park Avenue North and North 8th Street LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM January 3, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8- 11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430- 6510. PUBLICATION DATE: December 20, 1999 DATE OF DECISION: December 14, 1999 SIGNATURES: i2i/it-/19q Gregg Zim an, dministrator DATE Depart. e t of Planning/Building/Publi Works Jim Shepherd, Adnat" istrator DATE ommunity Services Department • /(T/ y Lee pi eler, Fire Chief DATE Renton Fire Department dnssignature CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-99-155,SA-H,ECF APPLICANT: The Boeing Company PROJECT NAME: Boeing Parking Lot Project DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The Boeing Company is proposing the development of a 2,727- stall parking lot on a 22.45-acre site for existing company employees of the Boeing Renton Plant. Lot 6, which is currently utilized by employees,will be decommissioned after the completion of the proposed parking area. The subject property is zoned Heavy Industrial (IH)on the north two-thirds of the site and Commercial)Office (CO) on the south third. In addition to Environmental (SEPA) Review, the project is required to obtain Hearing Examiner Site Plan Approval. LOCATION'OF PROPOSAL: NE corner of Park Avenue North and North 8th Street Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Parks 1. The landscape plan for the project proposes the planting of Columnar English Oak trees. A mature Columnar English Oak can reach a height of 45 feet to 60 feet,which is taller than both the new 40- foot light standard with 4 lights and the existing street light standard. These trees will eventually prevent fight from reaching the sidewalk area near the existing street light standards. The revision of the landscape plan to substitute another species of tree should be required as a condition of approval for the site plan. 2. Landscape improvements are to be maintained by the property owner. Strategic Planning 1. The Parcel Identification (PID) number is incorrectly listed as 082305-9001. The correct PID is 08230519011. Plan Review—Sewer 1. The site'Il is currently served by the City's Boeing Lift Station. With the completion of the demolition, the only flow that would continue to this station would be approximately 14 gpm from the mechanical room scheduled to remain. The City's station is designed to handle much greater flows. Therefore, as imposed by the SEPA mitigation measures for the demolition project(file no. LUA-99-121, ECF), the applicant is required to design, permit, and install an individual private lift station to convey the remaining sewage flows from the site. The station is required to be installed and operational prior to the finalization of the demolition permit. Plan Review—Storm Drainage 1. Temporary erosion and sediment control measures must be provided for the duration of the project, pursuant to RMC section 4-4-03005. 2. All remaining active storm inlets in the project area must be protected with filter fabric. 3. Dust control must be provided for the duration of the project. 4. Pursuant to code requirements, the applicant must provide appropriate on-site water quality treatment for the project in one of the following ways: a.) Provide biofiltration and a wetpond or wetvault; or b.) Provide an oversized wetvault,which is 150%larger in volume than a normally sized wetvault. The revised drainage control plan, including calculations, must be submitted prior to the issuance of construction permits and is subject to the review and satisfaction of Development Services Division. Plan Review—Water The applicant is required to install stortz"quick-connect"fittings on the closest two hydrants which serve the site. City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: QmsAv kc &TV\ C- COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 1, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-155,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 17, 1999 rrY APPLICANT: The Boeing Company/Rick Ford PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihi a `„-. PROJECT TITLE: Boeing Parking Lot WORK ORDER NO: 78602 tG(••I LOCATION: NE corner of Park Avenue North and North 8th Street I' ;,: SITE AREA: 22.46 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 140 Li.;• #� �Ia�I SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The Boeing Company is proposing the development of a 2,727 stall parking lot on a 22.46.acfe'tsite. .. .. The total area of proposed pavement is approximately 879,510 s.f. Approximately 90,368 s.f of landscaping is also included with the proposal. The subject site was previously developed with the 10-60 and 10-65 buildings, which were recently approved for - demolition under project no. LUA99-121,ECF. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS A. E ( g Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary -Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • Noile6; C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have re "ewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where ad onal information is needed to pro erly assess this proposal. Si ature of Directo r Author¢ed epresentativ Date Routing Rev.10/93 l!f/ • SO City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONM 'NTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Vaykess COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 1, 1999 I C APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-155,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER.17, 1999 APPLICANT: The Boeing Company/Rick Ford PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira PROJECT TITLE: Boeing Parking Lot WORK ORDER NO: 78602 LOCATION: NE corner of Park Avenue North and North 8th Street ' SITE AREA: 22.46 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The Boeing Company is proposing the development of a 2,727 stall parking lot on a 22.46 acre site. The total area of proposed pavement is approximately 879,510 s.f. Approximately 90,368 s.f of landscaping is also included with the proposal. The-subject site was previously developed with the 10-60 and 10-65 buildings, which were recently approved for demolition under project no. LUA99-121,ECF. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water LighVGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ HistoddCultural Natural Resources Preservation I Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet ��jjJf B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS aIna--z c_. Co - ncr� A 00/C c -u ci7 c L -_ v,i,I)f 75 - CCU GU7�e j adir y—fir' i?� )4o ` 2- /'uO ii„ tot �S7�t; �,/ ,, rv ,4 J Grc 6iL�'� �v i T/ ,Th,e,--/ // iir - /--era -,472 a--,a,60,-/-4,1,t ,f467_____Ozn , / fri,vviciavis,4e0 i ,,,__ (s-,06, =/C._arie-ex.._,/n9- ---74, ,,,,,z,ey-_ nA li pzi 7�1 . dy1G�.f/I/l%.44_, ,p_,C. CODE RELATED CODE-RELATED/COMMENTS ? .( /0 7 g We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additio al information is needed to r erly assess this proposal. �� lI ILP/77 Signature of 'rector epresentative Date Routing Rev.1W193 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ?\aR 1�eo 1-e-uJ—\.l)d "COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 1, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LIJA-99-155,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 17, 1999 APPLICANT: The Boeing Company/Rick Ford PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira PROJECT TITLE: Boeing Parking Lot WORK ORDER NO: 78602 N�o LOCATION: NE corner of Park Avenue North and North 8th Street 0V- `'"f0 SITE AREA: 22.46 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF-PROPOSAL: The Boeing Company is proposing the development of a 2,727 stall_p rtng lot on a 22.;4�-Acre site. The total area of proposed pavement is approximately 879,510 s.f. Approximately 90,368 s.f of landscaf' .i also lift- ied with the proposal. The subject site was previously developed with the 10-60 and 10-65 buildings, which were recbrl yapproved for demolition under project no. LUA99-121,ECF. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation _ Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet N\oti B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS I N1S-MCS-. ScDy z " QUIc L -Con.A)G,GV F(1 fl1v(-t S o C.I.cOSSST of 1 , K.)Ts S yILA sty C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS sloe- We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. In Oolittaif1 1t V 9 Si t of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10193 . g City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET 1 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: a1 ,,tto r d UJ uu-a-Uv"COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 1, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-155,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 17, 1999 APPLICANT: The Boeing Company/Rick Ford PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira A`' PROJECT TITLE: Boeing Parking Lot WORK ORDER NO: 78602 LOCATION:"NE corner of Park Avenue North and North 8th Street .. ` c5�Gl '') SITE AREA: 22.46 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): '�® (/:..�� '41/_} ,E t ..9 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:.The Boeing Company is proposing the development of a 2,727 stall parking lot o 46.acrlisite.-. The total area of proposed-pavement is approximately 879,510 s.f. Approximately 90,368 s.f of landscaping is.a trcluded with the proposal. The' subject°site was previously developed with the 10-60 and 10-65 buildings, which were recently alp-graved for demolition under project no. LUA99-121,ECF. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the 'll Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment I Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities f/ Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation _ _ Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet , B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • S t� , Lk Ws fS -O\ -I- �✓1 t J f "�tr?.tit i,i C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional inforrpation is needed to property assess this proposal. /C:2; I —.I— L--- / ////9.7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative / Date Routing Rev.10/93 10-60& 10-65 BUILDINGS PARKING LOT 800 PARK AVE. N. Environmental Review for Parking Lot November 30, 1999 SEWER: Requested SEPA condition: Boeing shall design, permit, and have installed a individual private lift station to convey the remaining sewage flows from the site. The station shall be installed and operational prior to finalization of the demolition permit. The site is currently served by the City's Boeing Lift Station. With the completion of the demolition, the only flow that would continue to this station would be approximately 14 gpm from the mechanical room scheduled to remain. The City's station is designed to handle much greater flows. STORM DRAINAGE: 1. Provide erosion control. 2. Remaining active storm inlets in the project area to be protected with filter fabric. 3. Dust control to be provided. 4. Temporary sediment control measures to be installed and maintained. 5. The following is an excerpts the attached memo from Surface Water Utility(Ron Straka). The project proposes to convert a large amount of roof top impervious surface to parking lot impervious surface that will be subject to vehicular use. Code requires the project to provide water quality treatment, at a minimum,for all new parking lot(impervious surfaces subject to vehicular use) pavement areas. The code requires biofiltration and a wetvault water quality treatment, since the project will add more than one acre of impervious surface subject to vehicular use and discharge to a type I or II water body within one-mile of the site. We can allow the use of an oversized wetvault in lieu of a combination biofiltration swale and normal sized wetpond/wetvault treatment system. The oversized wetvault must be 150%larger in volume and surface area than a normally sized wetvault. In addition, a coalescing plate oil/water separator to be provided since the project will add more than 5-acres of impervious surface subject to vehicular use and may have more than 2,500 vehicle trips per day. This item should be made a condition of SEPA. 99cm102D 99CM102D.DOC\ f, r 1 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS. MEMORANDUM DATE: November 30, 1999 TO: Clint Morgan,Planning FROM: Ron Straka, Surface Water Utility , 60 SUBJECT: Boeing Parking Lot 3B,Review Comments The following are review comments regarding the redevelopment of Boeing 10-60 and 10-65 Building sites into anew parking lot(Lot 3B). The project is proposing to only provide a coalescing plate oil/water separator, which is only one of the water quality treatment systems required by City code. The project is not adding new impervious surface and, therefore, is exempt by City code from providing on-site detention for stormwater runoff. The project does, however, propose to convert a large amount of roof top impervious surface to parking lot impervious surface that will be subject to vehicular use. Code requires the project to provide water quality treatment, at a minimum, for all new parking lot (impervious surfaces subject to vehicular use) pavement areas. Code re l uires biofiltration and a wetpond or wetvault water quality treatment, since the project will add more than one acre of impervious surface subject to vehicular use and discharge to a Type I of II waterbody within one-mile of the site. We will allow the use of an oversized wetvault in lieu of a combination biofiltration swale and normal sized wetpond/wetvault treatment system. The oversized wetvault must be 150% larger in volume and surface area than a normally sized wetvault. In addition, a coalescing plate oil/water separator may be required, since the project will add more than 5 acres of impervious surface subject to vehicular use and may have more that 2,500 vehicle trips per day. As a condition of SEPA the City could choose to require the runoff from the whole site to be treated by the above water quality treatment methods prior to being discharged from the site. If you have any questions, please contact me at x-7248. . cc: Lys Hornsby Neil Watts H:\D I V IS ION.S\UTILITIE.S\DOCS\1999\C URRENT\99-798.do c\tb • \ City of RE Department of Planning/Building/Public I . ,, ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: -Main\Do-A:a-4101A COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 1, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-155,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 17, 1999, APPLICANT: The Boeing Company/Rick Ford PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira ". PROJECT TITLE: Boeing Parking Lot WORK ORDER NO: 78602 0 srvih LOCATION: NE corner of Park Avenue North and North 8th Street I et/,� '. 1,„,,,�� SITE AREA: 22.46 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): �0 ,, '99 r SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The Boeing Company is proposing the development of a 2,727 stall parking lot on a 2�2°46 acre site. The total area of proposed pavement is approximately 879,510 s.f. Approximately 90,368 s.f of landscaping is also inclad d with the proposal. The subject site was previously developed with the 10-60 and 10-65 buildings, which were recently approved for demolition under project no. LUA99-121,ECF. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the (Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water , Light/Glare Plants i Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities ./ Animals Transportation _I" Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS c i� % ./G7.L G G( „j�l'Z-27 Yf?( '6%'C..z.-. C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. / Signature of Director or Authorized Representative / Date Routing Rev.10/93 CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: December 3, 1999 TO: Lesley Nishihira FROM: Clinton Morgan SUBJECT: Boeing Parking Lot/Park Ave.N&N. 8th St. The traffic study indicates that the total of available parking spaces will be reduced by 35%. This reduction is 1490 spaces. The traffic study also indicates that there wouldn't be any reduction in number of employees. We are just raising a question. Would there be ample parking spaces for the employees? We want to make sure this would not cause any on street parking problems,especially for the residential neighborhoods. 99cm102B \\TS SERVER\SYS2\COMMON\H:\DIVISION.S\DEVELOP.SER\PLAN.REV\CLINT\99CM102B.DOC City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 9 i 1, eut h \ COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 1, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-155,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 17, 1999 APPLICANT: The Boeing Company/Rick Ford PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley-AMihi-e m T • NI i ' CEP PROJECT TITLE: Boeing Parking Lot WORK ORDER NO: 78602 FIRE PPF'ic:„T"-.'' 19 AU LOCATION: NE corner of Park Avenue North and North 8th Street NOV 171999 SITE AREA: 22.46 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:.The Boeing Company is proposing the development of a 2,727 stall p"ar{ti Ifoto -gant 4 ar�.site. . The total area of proposed pavement-is approximately 879,510 s.f. Approximately 90,368 s.f of landscaping is also included with. the proposal: The subject site was previously developed with the 10-60 and 10-65 buildings, which were recently approved for demolition under project no. LUA99-121,ECF. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ I Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet PA B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 41/1 C. CODE-RELATED(COMMENTS , I We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas lh!r! where additio'a!information is - /ded to properly assess this proposal. 1 1 tI Ise 9 Signa Director or Authorized Rep -sentative Date Routing Rev.10/93 • City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: olAOVM kivuAdomMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 1, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-155,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 17, 1999 APPLICANT: The Boeing Company/Rick Ford PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira PROJECT TITLE: Boeing Parking Lot WORK ORDER NO: 78602 LOCATION: NE corner of Park Avenue North and North 8th Street SITE AREA: 22,46 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): NOV 1 7 1999 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The Boeing Company is proposing the development of a 2,727 stall parking lot on a 22.46 acre sit . - The total area of proposed pavement is approximately 879,510's.f. Approximately 90,368 s.f of lar ds i A 6W 4'0 dd wth the proposal. The subject site was previously developed with the 10-60 and 10-65 buildings, which wer,� �� cfor demolition under project no. LUA99-121,ECF. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth _ Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use _ Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic./Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS ` t L3T�Pt..o �-6.Lsn - (Sourii w'rrktcw( 7 Lc3A' 1r.iou (nib StirN) ' ll-Ls t21-191v . NrD L.1L! tsSUt"3 r'o'i t Pin ��rtitjt )5 Li 5 0'i5Z305-Ao Sae✓ as/Z3c'y- o�I s 1-ZLi7 t L ('L, 7- 7V) C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addilz n.l inf mlatiorr:Leeded to properly assess this proposal. I �� �s.9� Signature of( 'rector or A(dhorized Representative Date Routing `I Rev.10/93 P City of Renton apartment of Planning/Building/Public Wor ENVIRONMEN AL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICA N REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: \ o t COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 1, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-155,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 17, 1999 APPLICANT: The Boeing Company/Rick Ford PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira • PROJECT TITLE: Boeing Parking Lot WORK ORDER NO: 78602 LOCATION: NE corner of Park Avenue North and North 8th Street SITE AREA: 22.46 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The Boeing Company is proposing the development of a 2,727 stall parking lot on a 22.46-acre site. The total area of proposed pavement is approximately 879,510 s.f. Approximately 90,368 s.f of landscaping is also included with - the proposal. The subject site was previously developed with the 10-60 and 10-65 buildings, which were recently approved for demolition under project no. LUA99-121,ECF. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation v Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health _Public Services v Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet Z,121,1Cad 1 2'2 )0OOce, I. eAv/e B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS it C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. e /2 '/7'- Signature of Director or A th rized Representative Date Routine Rev.10/93 CITY )F RENTON ..iL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator I - January 04, 2000 Mr. Rick Ford The Boeing Company PO Box 3707, M/S 19-35 Seattle,WA 98124 SUBJECT: I Boeing Parking Lot Project Project No. LUA-99-155,SA-H,ECF Dear Mr. Ford: This letter is to inform you that the comment and appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed. As you know, a Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, January 11, 2000 at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Plan Approval. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at(425)430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, Lesley Nishihira Project Manager II FINAI 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer - :% 4 CIT' )F•RENTON eaLL Planning/Building/Public Works Department • Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator December 16, 1999 • Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia,WA 985041-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC)on December 14, 1999: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE • BOEING PARKING LOT LUA-99-155SA-A,ECF The Boeing Company is proposing the development of a 2,727-stall parking lot on a 22.45-acre site for existing company employees of the Boeing Renton Plant. Lot 6,which is currently utilized by employees,will be decommissioned after the completion of the proposed parking area. The subject property is zoned Heavy Industrial (IH) on the north two-thirds of the site and Commercial Office (CO)on the south third. In addition to Environmental (SEPA) Review, the project is required to obtain Hearing Examiner Site Plan Approval. Location: NE corner of Park Avenue North and North 8th Street. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM January 3, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,iWA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section.4-8- 11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430- 6510. If you have questions, please call me at(425)430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, c(//te..) Lesley Nishihir Project Manager cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher;Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Shirley Lukhang, Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Joe Jainga, Puget Sound Energy agencyltr\ 1055 South Grady Way=Renton,Washington 98055 This paper contains 50%recycled material.20%post consumer .. ,t ,. CITY cF RENTON . Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator • December 16, 1999 Mr. Rick Ford The Boeing Company PO Box 3707, M/S 19-35 Seattle,WA 98124 SUBJECT: Boeing Parking Lot Project Project No. LUA-99-155,SA-H,ECF Dear Mr. Ford: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee(ERC) and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on December 14, 1999, decided that your project will be issued a Determination of Non- Significance. • The City of Renton ERC has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made by the ERC under the authority of Section 4-6-6, Renton Municipal Code, after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information, on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM January 3, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, January 11, 2000 at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Plan Approval. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at(425)430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, Lesley Nishihira Project Manager • dnsletter _ \\\ 1055 South Grady Way-"Renton, Washington 98055 \ Thie n�nnr rnn/einc�.f oL, .,..Ind menn�l 9l1%nnc/rnnci.mnr CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-99-155,SA-H,ECF APPLICANT: The Boeing Company PROJECT NAME: Boeing Parking Lot Project DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The Boeing Company is proposing the development of a 2,727- stall parking lot on a 22.45-acre site for existing company employees of the Boeing Renton Plant. Lot 6, which is cu gently utilized by employees,will be decommissioned after the completion of the proposed parking area. The subject property is zoned Heavy Industrial (IH)on the north two-thirds of the site and Commercial Office(CO)on the south third. In addition to Environmental (SEPA) Review, the project is required to obtain Hearing Examiner Site Plan Approval. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: NE corner of Park Avenue North and North 8th Street Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Parks 1. The landscape plan for the project proposes the planting of Columnar English Oak trees. A mature Columnar English Oak can reach a height of 45 feet to 60 feet,which is taller than both the new 40- foot light standard with 4 lights and the existing street light standard. These trees will eventually prevent light from reaching the sidewalk area near the existing street light standards. The revision of the landscape plan to substitute another species of tree should be required as a condition of approval for the site plan. 2. Landscape improvements are to be maintained by the property owner. Strategic Planning 1. The Parcel Identification (PID)number is incorrectly listed as 082305-9001. The correct PID is 082305 99011. Plan Review—Sewer 1. The site is currently served by the City's Boeing Lift Station. With the completion of the demolition, the only flow that would continue to this station would be approximately 14 gpm from the mechanical room schedulied to remain. The City's station is designed to handle much greater flows. Therefore, as imposed by the SEPA mitigation measures for the demolition project(file no. LUA-99-121,ECF), the applica t is required to design, permit, and install an individual private lift station to convey the remaining sewage flows from the site. The station is required to be installed and operational prior to the finalization of the demolition permit. Plan Review—Storm Drainage 1. Temporiary erosion and sediment control measures must be provided for the duration of the project, pursuant to RMC section 4-4-03005. 2. All remaining active storm inlets in the project area must be protected with filter fabric. 3. Dust control must be provided for the duration of the project. 4. Pursuant to code requirements,the applicant must provide appropriate on-site water quality treatment for the project in one of the following ways: a.) Provide biofiltration and a wetpond or wetvault; or b.) Providean oversized wetvault,which is 150% larger in volume than a normally sized wetvault. The revised drainage control plan, including calculations, must be submitted prior to the issuance of construction permits and is subject to the review and satisfaction of Development Services Division. Plan Review—Water The applicant is required to install stortz"quick-connect"fittings on the closest two hydrants which serve the site. , . _, NO...;r10 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: 1 BOEING PARKING LOT PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER:. LUA-99-155,SA-H,ECF The Boeing Company,is proposing the development of a 2,727-stall parking lot on a 22.45-acre site for existing company employees .of the Boeing Renton Plant. Lot 6, which is currently utilized by employees, will be decommissioned after the completion of the proposed parking area. The subject property is zoned Heavy Industrial (IH)on the north two-thirds of the site and Commercial Office (CO)on the south third. In addition to Environmental(SEPA)1Review,the project is required to obtain Hearing Examiner Site Plan Approval. Location: NE corner of Park Avenue North and North 8th Street. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM January 3, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner,City of . Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)430-6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, January 11, 2000 at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Plan Approval. If the Environmental Determination is appealed,the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. G A_ . 4�\l\ PUCEf SOUND POWER .-. IH 1� f I •n� h MIT COMPANY (II/11 1 11`n\\\ IH ` 11��� T== \ . U o R` ;.E ✓ DOS PG P/A PO LOT �1Q�.• l,�lel. 10 RELLVN .v /e. •��,.49 L01 fi.1d-lJ 11 I r;: ! •Q;..�a � xiv. � I ,�y���_������,! NEW BOEING 'tp'r'�,cT c. `�- l0„ m Q ,b 'Jj1,lj � I PARKING LOT SRE o ■t `•..-.,fd . - 4411 siR ed Ilk La; b [J I • lat lk O WINC PARKING LOT1 • T I ' illir‘ T O RLWOL i1 � k. k r na'�rO Ij :°�I4 ;N afnC.�o vCO0o ° Tn\--,--- --ii � _ IH —I '-jkT ' 1o` S �\ llIit 1 : IH!I i .I I 1 � . � I_ i{ � QIg 1 i �1%r--. _ hl iA �- Q' a 1 - If li li - it - � - - ,' . . - -):11. I \ '" I ie I ICI. !I .m1 ! 61..; ,.i _i )1 - VI 11 ,:.p ,,,„, ,..,,, , , ,_ tu.,,,y,_.:,,,, ,., : mac n Il 11 11)_ FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION • Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. BOEING PARKING LOT LUA-99-155,SA-H,ECF Proposed development of a 22.45-acre site for use as a parking lot. Location: NE corner of Park Ave. No. and No. 8th St. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM January 3, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, January 11, 2000 at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Plan Approval. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. Interested parties are invited to attend the public hearing. Publication Date: December 20, 1999 Account No. 51067 dnspub STAFF City of Renton REPORT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE: December 14, 1999 Project Name: Boeing Parking Lot Project Applicant: The Boeing Company File Number: LUA-99-155, SA-H, ECF Project Manager: Lesley Nishihira Project Description: The Boeing Company is proposing the development of a 2,727-stall parking lot on a 22.45-acre site for existing company employees of the Boeing Renton Plant. Lot 6, which is currently utilized by employees,will be decommissioned after the completion of the proposed parking area. The subject property is zoned Heavy Industrial (IH) on the north two-thirds of the site and Commercial Office (CO)on the south third. In addition to Environmental (SEPA) Review, the project is required to obtain Hearing Examiner Site Plan Approval. The total area of proposed pavement is approximately 879,510 square feet. Also included with the proposal is approximately 90,368 square feet of landscaping with irrigation to be distributed throughout the exterior and interior of the site. An existing 8,140 square foot utility building and connecting sky bridge is proposed to remain on site. The subject property was previously developed with the 10-60 and 10-65 buildings,which were recently approved for demolition under project no. LUA-99-121, ECF. After the completion of the approved building demolitions and the installation of the proposed parking area, a total of 13,234 parking stalls would be provided for the Boeing Plant. This number is within the range of spaces required by the parking regulations for the remaining uses on site. Project Location: NE corner of Park Avenue North and North 8th Street Exist. Bldg.Area gsf N/A Proposed New Bldg.Area gsf N/A Site Area 22.45 acres Total Building Area gsf N/A RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS). _ _ ,\p IH ,i `' PUGET SOUND POWER )' in \--,, N'' S '-"1 &LIGHT COMPANf —1 S \-- ------- / 0` \\,( , \j _____ a —�_ d �i' 7 'r EXISTING PARKING LOT ._z° -,'C� i Q ,�,�='�i�l�Z �� TO REMAIN 'U1 _ ° , D��8..,,'LOT li sO V m-s; = D'0,104 '*M a�,4. ,5-55 15-5, - 1�� IC NEW BOEING 5-, p�J 011 .� ._>, ,_„ O = p'i�1�1 \ PARKING LOT SITE 5-8 `� L It gl'u (jl-B 7 1-) 4-]I �' `i ,°-I] ,°- 10`I]' --- '1� i 5 1-7°�e0 1® '-Bt' �✓-'3O N. 'STREET' „�,� S< OS EXISTING PARKING LOT 5-.° N Va \ �. LOT 7 b - �,o +Q I h� 03 , c 10-110 n!d- ��77�� TO REMAIN i / 1;�,Y �, FENCE 10as .1,.<�. ONSF RAILROAD ercr t Project Location Map W� • s M I' i? !°y" I F e n I R ■u 1-� I�y"�u°-6 10_ co c0 1 — - Q \ -- - " 7 __'°-.%i,° �„ATH S EET _ n 11 - IH-- —— - = I City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environn it Review Committee Staff Report BOEING PARKING LOT LUA-99-155,SA-H,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF DECEMBER 14, 1999 Page 2 of 4 B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF XX NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES The analysis of the proposal does not reveal any impacts requiring mitigation above and beyond existing code provisions. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Parks 1. The landscape;plan for the project proposes the planting of Columnar English Oak trees. A mature Columnar English Oak can reach a height of 45 feet to 60 feet,which is taller than both the new 40-foot light standard with 4 lights and the existing street light standard. These trees will eventually prevent light from reaching the sidewalk area near the existing street light standards. The revision of the landscape plan to substitute another species of tree should be required as a condition of approval for the site plan. 2. Landscape improvements are to be maintained by the property owner. Strategic Planning 1. The Parcel Identification (PID)number is incorrectly listed as 082305-9001. The correct PID is 082305-9011. Plan Review—Sewer 1. The site is currently served by the City's Boeing Lift Station. With the completion of the demolition, the only flow that would continue to this station would be approximately 14 gpm from the mechanical room scheduled to remain. The City's station is designed to handle much greater flows. Therefore, as imposed by the SEPA mitigation measures for the demolition project(file no. LUA-99-121, ECF), the applicant is required to design, permit, and install an individual private lift station to convey the remaining sewage flows from the site. The station is required to be installed and operational prior to the finalization of the demolition permit. Plan Review—Storm Drainage 1. Temporary eroision and sediment control measures must be provided for the duration of the project, pursuant to RMC section 4-4-03005. 2. All remaining active storm inlets in the project area must be protected with filter fabric. 3. Dust control must be provided for the duration of the project. 4. Pursuant to code requirements, the applicant must provide appropriate on-site water quality treatment for the project in one of the following ways: a.) Provide biofiltration and a wetpond or wetvault; or. b.) Provide an oversized wetvault,which is 150% larger in volume than a normally sized wetvault. The revised drainage control plan, including'calculations, must be submitted prior to the issuance of construction permits and is subject to the review and satisfaction of Development Services Division. Plan Review—Water 1. The applicant is required to install stortz"quick-connect"fittings on the closest two hydrants which serve the site. ercrpt City of Renton P/B/P1W Department Environn I Review Committee Staff Report BOEING PARKING LOT LUA-99-155,SA-H,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF DECEMBER 14, 1999 Page 3 of 4 D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 1. Earth Impacts: The subject site is generally flat with slopes of less than 2%. The site was previously developed with the 10- 60 and 10-65 buildings, 562,500 square feet of which were recently demolished under land use application number LUA-99-121, ECF. An 8,417 square foot utility building and connecting sky bridge are to remain on the site. Minor grading and excavation activities would be necessary for the appropriate surfacing of the parking lot and installation of storm drainage facilities. In order to reduce the potential for erosion and control sedimentation during the clearing, grading, and construction of the site, the applicant will be required to implement temporary erosion/sedimentation control measures as required by RMC section 4-4-030C. The applicant has submitted a construction mitigation plan and a storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP)pursuant to the Department of Ecology requirements. These plans include the use of best management practices, such as silt fences, catch basin filter inserts and hay bale filters to control erosion, as well as watering of the site to control dust. In addition, all stockpiles will be covered with plastic coverings and weekly inspections of the SWPPP will be conducted. As indicated in the applicant's SWPPP, operation, maintenance, storage and disposal practices for potential pollutants other than sediment will be performed at the project site in order to reduce the potential for storm water contamination. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended. Nexus: N/A 2. Water Impacts: The proposal includes new landscape areas along the site's Park Avenue North and Garden Avenue North street frontages. Approximately 36,585 square feet of interior landscaping is also proposed,for a total of 90,368 square feet of landscaping throughout the site. Although the site is located near Lake Washington and the Cedar River, the proposed area of construction is well outside of the 200-foot boundary regulated by the City's Shoreline Master Program. The site is currently developed with 94%of impervious surface,with the remaining areas consisting of landscape features. The proposal would reduce the amount of impervious surface to 88%of the site and would increase the total landscaped area. The project is not anticipated to increase peak rates of runoff or affect off-site properties. The city's existing storm water system in Garden Avenue North would be adequate for the proposal. The site's existing storm water system is divided into three sub-basin areas, each draining independently into the city's storm water system. As part of the proposal, a number of catch basins would be added to the site that would connect to the existing points of discharge. After the completion of the parking lot, storm water is proposed to receive treatment through coalescing plate oil/water separators at each discharge point before releasing into the city's storm water system in Garden Avenue North. The city's storm water system eventually discharges into Lake Washington. Although the project would not increase the existing amount of impervious surface on the site, the proposal would convert of a large amount of roof top impervious surface to parking lot impervious surface that would be subject to vehicular use. Therefore, the project is required to provide water quality treatment, at a minimum,for all new parking lot pavement areas pursuant to city code. Since the project would add more than one acre of impervious surface subject to vehicular use and would discharge to a type I or II water body within one-mile of the site, biofiltration and a wetvault must be provided for water quality treatment in addition to the coalescing plate oil/water separators proposed. The use of an oversized wetvault in lieu of a combination biofiltration swale and normal sized wetvault treatment system would be acceptable. If the applicant chooses to provide an oversized wetvault, the wetvault must be 150% larger in volume and surface area than a normally sized wetvault. Existing code provisions will require the applicant to revise the proposed storm drainage plan so that the runoff from the site is treated by one of the water quality treatment methods discussed above prior to being discharged from the site. The revised plan will be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of construction permits. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended. Nexus: Environmental (SEPA)Ordinance, Drainage(Surface Water)Standards ercrpt City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environn 1 Review Committee Staff Report ' BOEING PARKING LOT LUA-99-155,SA-H,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF DECEMBER 14, 1999 Page 4,of 4 E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has;been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing onjor before 5:00 PM January 3,2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. ercrpt . SQUARE FOOTAGE STATISTICS `` \\\!\\Y \\+"' \\ ,Y-�\\\+"' \\Y��( \\+"' + + ,i T1`' `,,� 1 - - ■�■■■ TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF SITE 978�018 y\�. \T\\�+� 1\ \1�; �\\�" \\ i\\\\\�\\\�T\1\ \`� `\r\,\ ++\\\\ \\\\1+\\\\Ts�+�\\� " ' „ix ... mow+. ---- -TOTAL PAVED-SUFACE OF OGSONG PAW(WG--194.070-- \ \\\\,,\1\ \ \\\\" \\1- \ 1\\y- `\1 \\\\\i \\\ " _ _1 1___I I -I-- T,y 7 7 7 7 '� -.III TOTAL PAVED SURFACE OF NEW PARKING 685.440 %• ___` V\\\\` \\1 \\�/ \\ \\ \.. 111 =/ -+�J-J IE'I-�f,( m14•n 1 rn 1 rm rn 1 rn I r -.II BRAIDING SQUARE FOOTAGE IL14o +,\�� ((\\\1;1\+t\\��\.`\rc\,\\0\�\+`\\�` q\\\\\\\1\\ � �`,`.\�\\1\1\\\\\\ -� i ' '-- 1�'I I I I I I I I III PERCENTAGE Q SITE COVERED BY BUXOM Nal \\\ \ f`{` • "AREA CF NEW woe DIRDE SETBACKS 7J0.165 .Y� ,`,`, A+AREA CF NEW INTERIOR IANDSGWWG ]6.565 \\+ \\ ,.`)s�{{�(\\\1 \\ +\\ �\ 1\r \\\., �' bI -: tilwiliti 111111I IIIPFRCZNTAGE of o/1FJI0R lANOSCAPINC 5K \\Y \,",- \\\ wpil �•{ \\++ CF SETBA` \\,+" 53.7 v\0." I'M'`\\\\0111\2,�\\1\\\\\\\`+ \\1\\\\ �i-c•c0 + '�. 1 1 L I j II I'I IIIII III 1 I I I I I I I I i I 11 I I ' ' • \\\\\�1\\\\\1 \\\\\\\-111 \6 \\\ \1\\PI'10\ \ \1�.0L1'\1\\\\\\ •r0`Q • I II' FAR , 1I1 1\1,- ,\\\�\1�` 11\ 0. \\\\\\�\\�;\�10.- \11\�\``\\\\.\\\ �0 1. \\\ I I:IIII. ''II II: I 1\1�\\�\\i\\\\1\ \1\\\i \\11 \\\\ r\\\ 8 I .I I'I IC I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I'I'I'I'I I I I CI I'I'I'I'I I'I'1 1117: 1 \\\\\11 \\\\\\��\\\\1\ \\\� \ �\`� I II Li LLII Li LLIJ.LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLIJ.ILLI 'I Via\\`\1�\111\ \\\a\\`\\m illW" - - ,- I I WI: I t - ' .t s qt.,.-21 ii: i 1 ;a It Zia ,A ,„ ,,, - . i....:i. 6 f,„ ,L\ i , — "11" if---- : 0.:„... sb —, ; . _ . ' '�.� _ _ \ \ \` \� w" i I ' I_ �Il iSMNrrI_tf�ttlftititititi'��rr1� ,, +. `� R C =�_� -1==I=10 •16F\4\i %i\� �� L 1 1 I�1 o— II .:, � , �.� — t _ , 4 .tIra ! t3einNYMIHIIIMINHIlil OIIIINN�Ititititi{IIIIIIIN�IIItiti O I ,:, ,.� %, A.. . t. I , , ..\ • ' \\`, 1%... ��, , __ ___ _ . __ , , ,..,,.... `�, e„ —1— , i ` I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I :-.i . • N \`' ,,�►., \ N . �;Ia -I- _ i 1414 ► ��\ CHILLER �Illl(((I11111111IIIII((f((I�1111 \ \\/` 1` N \�. i I �.�► t �� ,\\ ANNEX - d 1 o- 1 I • =ry illl .. �IlltitititititiMIlliIlIlftitititi�ll:o. • I, . b \ -I \ \\ .. \ _ — .ram..--�voe�s as--i®F—'"2--erg •�11 LO �`..\`� _ice _ :\� --�� �• =:C' ��:,.��W�.�s=�'.'� er _ .I�Illll �v \.\ \\\ .`�.y��OO `1� - : I ~�-�}�ITT1 LI.-1. .T F.iJ.LL�i■— Z i��i - 1:21 W7-_ .:py - - .O O - ail R R 1_ _ a- L �i.i-3�J=-!_ati--�i-J�C �_ \ N� \ r O. OO ,r b181 1 rr -.ice \�F,1 r� �f---- r1 T-=rt. ,� .cr� —TT� I \\� I �f 0 I 1 LEGEND • . \ \� \ • \ I ,C_LI I I ® PARKING OMSION ` I ' • \�. \ i, I I�1 I NEW SETBACK LANDSCAPING EXISTING PARKING NEW PARKING • \ .' \ 3 0 I• I �n PARKING NLL SIZE COMPACT PERCENTAGE PARKING FULL SIZE COMPACT PERCENTAGE 2O �\ \ \ II'O T", _' NEW INTERIOR LANDSCAPING DMSION STALL STALL COMPACT OMSION STALL STALL COMPACT O . ` 111 I Ay 9.0,20 6.5x16 STALL 9.0420 8.5.16 STALLS 1 \�! I 14 1 1�. -.-.--NEW CONSTRUCTOR BOUNDRY ^ •� C 7■� 1 ]99 0 0 3 12 0 0 " \� \ \`\, \• \ .. 1I I I��♦ x SECURITY FENCING 2 227 0 0 4 266 310 S].B �, \\ \\ ` y " 1\• : ': 626 0 0 5 896 ]09 J0.7 - '_ • • • 1 0 -1 I`i f I-I . * NEW 40•TALL POLE W/4 LIGHTS O 400W EACH 7 52 0 0 • `' \ __ / \ ` \ `, �'�• �" I I I I I I u rnrnNG LIGHT STANDARD TOTAL 126fi 635 39.7 • ' / l�+ \ • III I I I I I I I d ^A EXISTING STREET UGHT STANDARD OVERALL PARKING STALL COUNT = 2727 PLANNING SUBMITTAL i O IXISTINC LANDSCAPING ALL MAROCAPPRO AND CO VOOL STALLS ARE LOf:A7FD NODE TIE BODNG PLANT IN CLOSE PROIDBTY 10 NGIa(AREAS y EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT Harris Group bc' . ;N NEW FIRE M•DRANT 99_I0629 ..m., .� m KR= • wm •. .n o.o. • ...om e.n ACCD'IA6ART .P.0010U1 141T.t. SITE PLAN 991069 1 O I0.1S.99 I. 11w■W v0I.1 IOflD In1nN ®.■/■ .r,. . //, B�L��fI■ n n lnun 101 P(KIPOSED PMgNG L07 JB - . 1fP" `H 1Q13" RENTON SITE C 1 00 ... n.wu CA11.WASTER iQd W RFHfON • 36'WOE CURB OJT SQUARE FOOTAGE STATISTICS \\\1y \\‘ `,�,, 1� {T - - COSTING r HIGH FENCE\ --------TON-SQUARE FOOTAGE Mp-P/1dOND--;B;:a�O---Y\A• VI \\\`\``"������ ``�`\,\"\\\'\\`�\`" �\\`\\\�� ,\� ` '�\\\\\\� \��� '"`\,T�• - `i�f1Tf(ITT(1Tlf�T1 T� rl r�1T� -- \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\\ a, -1--1 I I W �nnm ! J TOTAL PAVED SURFACE OE NEW PARKING 665.440 •• ,,,\\�\•\\\\\1 „\\\\\\ �\C\\ \tom \\ \\ I-------- TOTAL BUM1Dwc SQUARE FOOTAGE 8,140 \\\\ \\\\\ ,,\\\\ \\\�\\\ t \\�..;\\\\\1\ i% F I PURKx7RTAKI ai 91E COWED BY BINDING aau �„\\\ m`` „\\\�� �\S`\\ ``\ "1 \ OVC\\". \ dI ! Mil�I I�IfIill 1 I AREA NT NEW WD1M COW YI73a165 ' " ,1\\\''�\\" ..:: AREA OF NEW wTWaR 1Ax05CA SETBACKS 36,585 \'`\\ \ .``U\�\0 \\ ,��`O ‘1, %. 1 Qi lOr]A AREA OF NEW OF w ace L LANDSCAPING 5X \\Y 1\\ AREA OF SETBACK LANDSCAPING 53.783 \\\\ To\ \` \\\\\��\\\ \ \1 ,3>,t� • lT e\ LI 11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1111 III Y I I I III 1 `=I \\"' \\ \\\�,,... \ \ \ \\\\\1N\`%\\\\""\\\ \\\,\\1\\�\\ \\\\\" 'F�' - �„o0w0�"0 I IIIIIflllllllllllllll llllllllll�ll117111 I \\ \\\11i \\\ " 1 \\ 1\ \� s i o- 1 ctrKG O 1 \\\,— \\\\ ,033 \\\. \\\` - �1011 \\\1\ , - __—1 rrn I rrri ` _ 1 Ilrrrrrl I �t��JJf�f`y I I I I 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.I I.UM I.LI1 I I1TTfll I I I I +, \\� -i \\ \ �\\\ \ \ \\ \\\\\ \\1\\\ ,1\1` .+‘�1 II 111� ` � \ �= _om '� e rrri 7rr III I.. , •' e LILL RI LLLLLLLLLL I_ LI I\ " " , . ���\ . \01...0\ \ , ► 9 � , % NM I II ( l\ \ \ /' A S1 \ \ - oa T... 0).1--0\ \\\\\m0 yf v � LJryP II . . . 1Je .p 1k\ \ \\\ • 1 eiMTZ ® lJ 4011W =J t 1 A+ \\1.. I COMPACT ROW bblI� �1 '- =I= \ ` \\ 0 0` A Mom" I b I'4I- 1 ' of L '• O♦\♦`I 4=I= I= _=1- \. \\5 ` eA�" ` drotTwo 1 - I I ti 61 •• �,♦ •q��`C =.� _ I-�t ,I 14"V.' \\` A ( ` i I I. I J s'4 • , ='_ " AwcFe� \\, �A0`aG� !\, I COMPACT RDW 1 zr ,I. illalt : 1 j[ e ,:., ,, ... ..w. ,:. .,\‘ MUER AMR \�� •\\\ '. \\ , I 1\� . I LOYPACI ROM TO.SETBACK , ` . • \\\ *.fir �. I \-°°ems ,�\\�aa „® _I I J b f ° ' I: �\ \♦� `� �� �� �� Iv SETBACK b a a• 4 it ' TKw \` \ \\� '♦ �� \ \ ; , .v III iI 1' INTER-TE ' e T. Eh‘11. 161'22r,DWO0P.W6N2091669116WFININ ' \ \\\\` -i i iW �- + attK8 01 Cr.__ ,�.ww�_a 'O'''m"! !w'.717r3'rzara.a rU:ron .!•,'• ---- - _ C.IIIIWI �f1MlIrJ "AM'ELa�:�.� == 6. • \`� \� .'Q� ♦OO '`iyi•- 1 `-''�'''�'J I I.- -p T'�tr"1-LLI-1-1-$il_L 1_riJ-1-l.J-I-�..�c.l_.a_I_KLLI-L_,� C-Z--1_+• _ __=c-_ _ ---_ - -_ \ \\ \ . Q.�0x0~ ! ...........____I blbj ' I (r1r r-7r TRI-1 - -rr"- xs c1-- //-�1`�-—1 F�C r—,-: � c=rK-z •b 4•;�• \ \ O \. I I 1 I LEGEND �� 1 1 I 2 \ \ \ , 11l 1 I ® PARKING DMSION I, \\\ \� • -- �� 111111 1 I NEW SETBACK LANDSCAPING EXISTING PARKING NEW PARKING • \\'\ :: '22` 1 0 141• - I i PARKING FULL SIZE COMPACT PERCENTAGE PARKING FULL SIZE COMPACT PERCENTAGE O \ \E\ ,1/� {f: -__ - �, IV" .i G 1I E,� -,{, NEW INTERIOR LANDSCAPING OMSION STALL STALL COMPACT DMSION STALL STALL COMPACT N A \\ \ ,,\• �1I1'� 1 ,' I ll W 9.0a20 8.5•E6 STALL 9.ON20 6.5i16 STALLS O (/�1f \q\ ` ,IF I I 1� NEW CONSTRUCTION BOUNDRY t 399 0 0 3 12 0 0 ..... \ Or \ \\ % \` . \\'' I I 1C� •- SECURITY FENCING 2 227 0 0 4 266 310 53.6 6P �� �, \ `17 \ \ Y I'141 1 1 1 1 III= ta` EXISTING SIGN TOTAL 626 0 0 5 696 309 30.7 I' , `v\ I. 5 240 216 47.3SCALE \ I ` • I 1l ill 1RE NEW 40'TALL POLE W/4 UGHTS O 400W EACN 7 52 0 0 ` I I EXISTING UGNT STANDARD TOTAL 1266 635 39.7 1 / /\ \ \ d' III'I I I I I I I d I O EXISTING STREET MIT STANDARD OVERALL PARKING STALL COUNT = 2727 PLANNING SUBMITTAL i EXISTING LANDSCAPING AIL HANDICAP AND CMP00.STALLS ARE LOCATED*SIDE DIE BOEwC PLANT IN CLOSE PR09110IY TO PORK AREAS A^.•• • DJ EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT Harris Group • FlI NEW FIRE NYDRANT 69-1 9 rn PO . Aw1An1 . Mn ao .1 //.0 put KCT BAM 110. PTA WIMP 10.1}w 1 .wOMC KW 1o/om 10131 w®.Mp *A SITE PLAN 991069 0 TELILDS c Mmuwwo a M+ao n opwpw lnuw .BOE,iV4 PROPOSED PARKING LOT JB .w C 1 OO p..6 puMA 0.11w 1m[ Ll 10. 1199 RENTON SITE r• ""�'w _OW OSIER RarrowWM i • • NEW COAIESONG PLATE 36'WOE CURB CUT EXISTING 30'OISCHARE PONT OL/WAIER SEPARATOR FO DRAINAGE BASIN/13 1/3 OF A 2 YEAR STOW 0 25',EAR•10 CFS EMSIING T'NCH FENCE • \\\,y"\I\\\t" \', \\11\ttit4". .U 1,,1' 'Vt\:•'•,t.., '-\1tt.�. \.ail y.�\\\t.. •�• _ - _ _ _ ... om.IF• —_ .. 7. -- �\ �` „1\\\\\\`\\1\\\\\S\\\\;—\\\l\\-\\�\\`��\\\\\�\\\�t,\'\\\\\\\�` \_\\\\\\t-+,\\\-\\\� \\ ��cP•••�••+ ,� m • �hr- 1 I I I.�- ____ -- --- - - `IIIIII . t\\\\\\ \\-\ �v\� \\\\\ \,\ \ \\\ (,, �� +•;...••••_• �M O f H—I��Flfl F�_I—I ICI I I I�uw w ��\\\\`` \\\`\\1\T\1`'\\ ttpJpA �\\ \\\\�\t ••• / t \\I �j,� Be1PAggS9\\\ \\ 1-\\\\\t \\ \\\\\\\\\`\it\(M2 STORM \\\\\1\ ` c% ••O•+• -- _iii �\\ /\\\\ /;�';' K j;Lllil IIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIII III\\\\t \\\\\\U�\�\\\\" \\\y \\\ \\ \ \\\\1 \\\\�\t7o6�id4 sa \\\\\\�\\\ ••+•'••+ `t� �:: 155� \Y 1�III I I I,I I f ii I I l III i - \ ` \\ TM!oRAINAa; , \ • • +1 `t� CI o- I I!I,u I I}I I I I I I I \\\\ \\�\\�\\�\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\�\\\1\\\\ \\\\\ \\\\1\\ U\\\�F\`d\�\\ \\\� .0+•4 j��`yf ,,,♦♦�Q�\ ;•all y ��`� r- rllllllfl'Illlf�l'fILIwI�snNCPAw9NGEOT3A - i . (��� _ t • Ti \\\ \\\\\ \\\\\`\\\\\\;\\\\\\ \\\\\6�R�4brwA�a tr\\\\\\\ \�\�\\c ���,. — Ncc `` /+ r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I............{� f f ' \_ \ \\ AV I".". \\\ \ 1 ,•.••• aAW},Nc ♦ l sri ....I.f.f.l • \\\\\ \ \ \\\\ \\ YR•1Q \\`��•• S �/ ♦Q♦♦♦♦, /'� f I I'I'I'I I I I I I I I I I I'I I I I I'I'11'I'I'I'I'I'I'I'I'I'I'I I'I'I • 11 1 I \ \\\\\ \ \\\ \\\1\ r \\\\\\ \\\' :.: •• tioa ♦♦ sri wN+I�PI \ \\ ..........__. �\\\�\' \\\\\� \\\\\ \ \\ \\\\ t A••...•••• . 4, p �!� wNx \FJ Ik.l.l Hay.'LLLLLLLLLLLI I i.l.l.l.l.. I I h£LLI ' I I \ a \�\\\\\�sgc\\A N\fQ\\"�\"\ • "\\ •\� 't•+ w, * •t♦• ,I 1 , ,♦ ri ° 9l\1 s�c/sTs� 4 �. 1 h l I I x .. _/ I \\\ Ilsa A \\\ iri el..1� /' °� ��\ �� :. i��l l l I�� b •RB OJT \ ii, \\\\\ \\c .I d�0o... mot , j''� d --- I •—O�s Irr AiL \ 0.°\ - � ����' cr t�L, �A�.L�-' p '� t�� Ems• I I IITIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII{IIIIII :::<:>' `�'_ • . �/\:�%�._ /� ..��� a=1I= /r �r i 1, _.„,-----• Ow !r\� '' I iLOW bW' • - — ro.,,,,__,_,...,___t__ _- Oi Blfltitintii'MIN'flllltitilti41r1�1� 1 I i \\\\\ M I -1= TOLRE{IA"UNOWICFD \� VA 5\s/f_��00♦ • , STS - STS $IS o— .''_` \ QRC =7= _IBADSIMA�1= \� � ,aFIaA4EAC ♦ a I I — 1 f\ 1_ IN�'� /' s� \r,I.�~ r, � _+ ....:\ C Fri NA IGe^BASIN 3o I _✓ 1• ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ 4�� `•+ �P I =DRAINAGE BASIN I o—-P- 11.T d ``� I { I % ao+' t 3L. • .. I I C 11 I , , \ti` •48,.`_. :J. - -_-- �� a rim+ ��� _ �11�I�� ;� \ +\ \\\i\ �,� l \} \� l_```L--:�:-a -t-. \ •` \ \�� s ,\ \ita+l 1 ircmi5A1,1N- �' W, {FLow {noWFLG-- 5 ,•\\ \ �%4►,' �� ; _ _ i �� 5r. ��� • \�\ `��� �\ EX = all tit �I��II ll r �4 = i' '�� �� 111 I1 1) II ,� I\\ , •�� �`� 1-_ •94 _ �� � , � a A I � M f I sis-I I.ro- s6 I - �'. .\/ •,. \, \ L •�iri now - a -I --- ilit-dit _' ��•.- �W 10' r cli 1 I _ v- _ STS °fi � _.aoli, C � ill R0. �\ \ \ \i• /z '' `\ \\ '';, ecD' �— • `A I _•��'Vic= ® - dill .Zi,'. 1 TA • I \ _ w'WDC _ ' - -- -rws ■S, �'I I�;1 Imm \\\ �\ \,,\ a �..:.-. 2.,A` � �i ,�3".r _ fw�__ _— —_—— S1 __—. NEW-7�IIOf ABANDON EASIG— /O �, T , d • Wl-.�-- . tI1RB-OIHAE-f1J—y/ ti \ �` fA •OoO ip -It' 7 1 --onM♦ - ._�� •w�-l.._ Airing- - - _- actam�aM'1_— • \� \� i`r bbl•ly . ..= • �r• ��I• =rc, �' @. _ 1 @ brit ; /^/`\ \� \� H • . ' I I d! I C2l 11 LEGEND I. .i I / C • I I a EXISTING TYPE I CATCH BASIN •• • . ✓✓✓/// \\\•\ \\\• - .. \" -'•�1 I I'Ill I I • EXISTING TYPE II CATCH BASIN&MANHOLE • I O \ \` .\u\ \,! ._. .111, I I•h� l_._Q I - I13F-. EXISTING STORM SEWER • 1 © t \\ �\\ \� \ \\' =` F,a ORNNACE BASIN BOUNDRY O \� \ `\' \\\ \ • III —SR— PROPOSED STORM SEWER '� 3�� • • • (• \ M� \\\ \\` \ \ O I'I I' • iii I I I I I I IviL ® PROPOSED OIL,PATER SEPARATOR ISCALE�FEET `\`/\1 \ I \ • . I �i 1 t`I t F • PROPOSED TYPE I CATCH BASS , \ \ \`\\\ ,,\•�\•`/�j}1-,1 AI �, • I I I I t • PROPOSED TYPE II CATCH BASIN 1 / ,,A `\ \ \ OI'-1 I• I I I I I I I I I� 1 !FLOW STORM WATER SURFACE FLOW G PLANNING SUBMITTAL NEW SETBACK 1AN05CAPING ^- . HarrisEl NEW INTERIOR LANDSCAPING W D{� 99-10629 .4001 m Minn - we ors.�'B ''I"C°0011 •'91�91 • DRAINAGE CONTROL PLAN 991069• I"' 0- 10.15.99 gnononn 0 wKat o ME MA O wwwn fa16n OR m m O. ...�0 ��,.,(( ` A a - n OO,OiOI 1aI1" B�EZA1 • .wenn n Don. OM O'WWI lau" 101L PROPOSED PARKING LOT 38 ^300 Ma'" IM13M RENTON SITE l! mwNa y CML VASTER gNTON • • 16'WOE CURB CUT EXISTING T MN FENCE 1 1 11 LLa •\ � -- �`� \� A -\jsi"` f1 � min\�� \,v \w\\\ \\\\\�\\1\U\�\\ �r1 \\��\ \ ` \\�\ \- M • , -r-c _ lilyT1rf1TFR7 7F ,` \\ \\j\\\\ \\ \ -\\\\ \ \ \ \-- \\\1 t\\."\\\\\\\1 Tt\\ \\ \\\ 11\ \ —'-. \\\\ 'i j f\ � „\\\\\ R \ (�\\ \ \ � __ � �sw cED I—� �+�III�1 11 J II I II I I0 \ovv\\\ \\ \-\ \ ` \\\ \\\ \�\\ \\�� ;/ jc l Lig 1I I kI j III II 1III -�\ \\ \ \ TO WINN YI I l\ \ \\\ \ \\\\\\\\ \ \\\\\\ \ \ \\\`�\\j + ,-.% `o ° 1j, j llYIIIlII, # Ill in\\\\, \\\3„,,\\t" \\\ \ \\\\\ \__:\0�\\\\ .0\ � \\ \ ++.••.o , -.• u \ \ +\\\ y \ \\ \\\\ •'•�•+• " I .�. $F + 1ii[ i!iit.......... --IIII\\ \ \ \\\ \ �`\\, \ \� \\\\ \�\\\ \ \\\\\\\,\ \\\\ \\ \ \\\\\\ \\ . Jr :` SDK `\ \\ 0 \\\\\\\\ 0 ; c\\\t\\\ „\\\ \\ 1\\ • r, ' �:_ �� t i rrl rrrrrrlr_rrrri l Quid �a l I rrl I\\\\ \ \\\\\ ..\\ c •� \\\ �. .- !MX•\ �\\ \ \\ \\ \\ 1\\\\ \ ;,. sn �� _ LILLI .ILLLLLII• {I ILLI\� \ \\\\,� \\\ \ \ ,a\ \ \ :- I,\\ \ ` ?�' b\� \\ \ \ .01... IIiI li, �.:.-...,a.�....ai. jJ CUB ar NZ\ ��.T.sa `7 a ( "s .— ✓s's ik_ 0 I II' I611 J �� %� -`� 0 ` a, F 1 t I ,lift• .. •�� // § �,•osTNc dRaxct¢ls "� 1�• DEB+"'� - t F "-de - ,..�\\ 4=1= — A"�'__ t `�1\` ``1 gs d /'�s" srs s-fs sts ' — " ' - o V C I= -_ 1 WUA rAT-_f_ O\1 \���II —1 F" /•� I 1 I i — I J �0 ► \ `�paw. = _� I p; \ \\i _ 1,— t . 1 - , — Si \\�\ '' N =-�yK-_=-I_s =t= i- 1, A 1 IIIIIII II IIIII I II II II II II II I — \\\i\\ '�;� =1 I- tit k � g GruaAXxEX �II(((I(IIIIIIIIIflllllf((f(1f1� I I \ \ —} �_ to-ss - 111 �A. r a ..I� Apr I`4 41y 1y Iy4 1/I rI rI J 1I (, `� .\\\�\\\��`,♦ �' � `•��1�,� _ -GIs --->/ --�Is---F-- - - 2q-sETeAc �;. _t.. ..oatlE .r N �...r�__ �. -- i I11 I I!I I'I IIIII 1 • •. .11: �0 SIN 'I ra ,�� \ \� ,y tit —'yy�j7 �— , I ��:-_ ry t 11 I 2II 0'SE7BAC� s_r 'Y�\` ..�\•.\ \,.. ,.��\N �- _ x. ; .1 1_, � �t '_ �'II----_._-_ _ J�: `a�-t1-11i•i 111tPSD._. 5.,■nttir>t<1�7l 6-��r" ,.I4111 1 • �\_ ' �►=� ;Zt 36'WDE== _ ___ .- _ s �I++I�6nasa z~CErl -L iP �` 'CORN O=; .•___ •., .� "--<` ) " .,.._. _ uEm°-.777':c��7 ri --.- - -Aawowrns-•F- \` ��%oO °a •�=3_m n� _ Txrs._-.. ''7 -—- -x _ -��.u.L.•a.rr ` CURB arFu a— ——- • _ Oim zs71w rfiil•�tts ' _ b 7 \`NN `� �\r .00, `�` .,. ---."---,•b 1} °rS—I- '� _,,,,• . _ ,.• -H �. .•�_ _`mar-. __� Ltil'ilinu 114.1 814 - ` \ \ l I I(� 1 11 1 1 LEGEND oI _�_ 2 • . \ \ \ 1-y I1111 EXISTING TYPE I CATCH BASIN • 1e O `\,\ \\ .a ,1 ®I '� 0 EXISTING TYPE II CATCH BASIN ...� . N� \ 1,� „, tl� I 11 —may- EXISTTNO SANITARY SEWERIniC j 1 1 1 �\ ` \ . .��=`- t7�y�� —s5-.— EXISTING STORM SEWER fir �• O 4 ° — EXISTING \� \\�` , \ I ^kT� ¢ olf w¢ EXISTING FlRE WA7ERR 3L=14 IN FEET ( 1y11111 \ \ I \ \.' ER_ I �' I�t ; 13 PROPOSED DIL/WATER SEPARATOR SCALE 1'YY Y \ III, —F— PROPOSED FIRE UNE /I^1f ` T 'c '\�(tt'�1-11• •I•11 t, I I I I s —MS— PROPOSED STORM SEWER F / / ��N `\ \ \ ,\ �}•'' •t I! I I I I I I Q I • PROPOSED TYPE 1 CATCH BASIN PLANNING SUBMITTAL • PROPOSED TYPE II CATCH BASIN An, PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT Harris Group Inc. h. EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT 99-10629 .. mm . ...m . s.. men . .i.pm .n ®AawTY r:MIXO. is in '°""` U11LITIES PLAN 995089 Nit IFS° () 1035.99 T MOM c°aF1 Io/om tatsa ..A.A+msn u m11 AIN ,au9s (BOE//VQ' -.-.a• PROPOSED PARKING TOT NB bergC200 �r °i oama au» °ry` -IS" 'ASH RENTON SITE r '"'-•m CIA IMSTER RFNION'okra MODEM }BIM 1W3 may,. ....... 00�� 311S N01N321 wnai xsnp Y �. .�� e9 101 mum 0300000.1 ecs'm ^ ^a .�ffi .OA//�708 ljg 66r1m _ 0 ..I 100166 NYld 3dVOSONVI n�. wr,a, �9 a aw ,I1 M. . w� �, M.... Waw®.a x,a,a1 mNo, u9ut aaru 9 dc,a�` r�a xunevadi». au 6z901-66 • ay�101�SI11@H N0LL33NN03 30 1110d R31SOS a31X 1040 MI • HOLLOW ��N d-IIIIII 1�9 I \* \ ` ����� 1 310NYae/5300NI331q stems I' l . oa-1 3 qS 3'0.ez m 1 summon' /� ririll 1�, , " \, \ < Q.) 30v0I03,X13'eve ads.01--.O0 sows \ I5004 mN31m'808 •1,7.,0/1 Z xeo Nsro03 a/MV11o3/.YD101LSY3.a0e0a 503a300 , © 11a03 5N31m'eve T7..1 IISY 31da/1d NHNRY/.314NNd NNNM,YNY.Na3m SNNIXY83 0 i t \\ \� \\ �� �� 'lYU 01 101 350Yme NAM SNIM11NO3 ON 'I \ • S310N 108WAS 3YVVN NOWYV00 / 31NVN 1V3INV108 108YYAS f- (��I a • �� • \ N \ ••0 31f103H0S 1NVld I •u ; � I I 1 a mii V� .'‘ \‘\ v v \ ON3031 Ir I °\ O " \ •e °I ' �` — p J�Ltr��r� �— 5� �T_— J .._iT\-�\l1 V —Zi'-ae _�_r.Ir I • 44 , p °� \ c.\Ilik- !i b14 II 1- - _ - ___ -.I I- — _ L- - I s_ �o o° �� \�- T Tr 1— - u , \ O.fg�.Cy..y. .,,y — ., f-alTl I TI-I —__ - suoilillit ` '_`OOO//' ,\ 0. a-.-- -oxim3s6Nra 0r0156q- -�-- -- —--�)' --- ----- - ---a- _ �'• Ii' �• N " ' > �%a�w,�� "•'r'•'t..�.•.�+ . \ ` • -�\ — � • 41' • 17 P `,\ -\,\ \\ \ _ — • z - \ �\\ \ - � , \ \ac'. 1411'�rfC�±?o������..wnw._ ..,,,,,,,,to • r �=`-:�.::Y.. '•"_:'..a,__:�•. " -�^.-r._,....+.y:!_:'•>':.+1:+ _ s:. r. i}-s+..�., ...7,, f \ / . \ \\l II . `,�� ti {� .N:.. \ \\ e 7. \d �I! - 111 NI > ` of �\ \ \ s. 1 � \ . I \ r.\ \i '1 o �84 1 =• � \\\\Ti ' I0 rolI fHIIf titi� I116 . <. , •n st I. b\b 4' =I1=-=-I vwNn—wr-1 • b� \• a`'\PIIr 111 11I1{ 4 'Ill !lll l''II I\ �_ _I =1=b _ '' ,I I�I 1— FAII1111 { r11 1If I{— a,' \ — = _ =1= d� - ,, \ — �%�.— �;� \_i'Zvlll �, �� 10,3 •. . a ,�' ` `y �P{'' r ' ' 410° L,U:�:. c . \ - \\\ \t \, v .__jo• :III wit LIllII! . � ' •'IT1T11fT°'�= - w . . ill III li . . ... ......... , ° Y \\' 6 ` •�' \ \ \\ \\\ . \\\ .. , \\\ � \\\\\\ \\�\\� \\\I ' III1IIIIIIIIII If'I' I' I' I' IP ' I'� \\\ � \\\\\ \\\\ \\\ � \\ \ \\III I.I.I I..I.m.I ..I.I.I.I.I.I I.I.I.I.I.I. LL.. I. IA 1 � �\ 1 o • \J_IIIIIIIIIImill , ilk\\\\\ \\-\ ,i,....,......- _ -_-__-_--,---.:i--- \\\-\-\\\---\\\\\-\\'\\\'\-J\\\\\\ k •'‘\\\\\'-'s-c"\\\\\ '''"\\''.‘.\\\\‘‘ '‘"\\\''' \,? I U � �, • ° \\\\ \\\ 'I I I IIIII II I I I III I l ' \ —\ \ --\0, � \ \ \ � \ •11315.is MUS 001 xaraallo3 ax+xou33Nxm 30 Mid x,N -L — g , , ; \\ \\\�\\\ \\\ C\ t'�1 I ,I IoIi Iaar �asx3 . ; 6;.� ,�-CIS I I—ILLI —I-U IA% ^ rt _ \ \\\\v�\\ \`\ \\\\v \/`1\\ \\ \\ °\\\\\. 3NNf31YM N3N —.— I I rIlIII .,,•f'; o� •\\\\�\\\\\ \\\ �\\\t ` \\\\ \ \\\U1 \\\1 \��\ \`\ \\;�\\ � 3wur31YA%AL —•— wrsaY,�usoa��I" 1LI11LI111iL111LI1LI�1 I I _t- 1 -\�\\j \\\\\\\\\ \\�U\\\ \\\\\\�\ C \1C�\\\ \ t\\\\�\;mn \\a1; \ , .,,,\\\1.,1-r\ \\ \\\\ ..,1\1\\a1n\\d"„. . — — - Si ON3031 1 I' , • ....................---------i.i.:.:.:.i-:i' :'m]m§:::in:R!:::i:i:imrr.Y:..::o.Fi:ikoi.ao.t.wiiigiaifr.b,dilliiiiiiiOgli.lS C 5 ::>::::>:: ::<: igg.i.I.O.:•:1 . ::: >::::>:::: ::>::>::»::: I�.S...>~I�QPMi~N..... �. . �..S.. .I.�/......QN.................................................. . . maimm ,.-:,. _.::,......i. .....,.;v...a.gi::i.,.::.....,,WIggfralilimg : Q f.:J.. >).i..:' 6.Te sub e. tife<:1111 >:8:<:::::<:::::::>:::>::::<::>::;:>::::;<::::::>::>::::<::<:>:>::>:>«<:<:<>;::::::>:: PROJECTINAME: PA 20AN6 Zc r 3 do iv5TRv" rip& APPLICATION NO: LUA . 99 - 155 SW- H ,EC The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER C11� �le,^�j PI<�� � E .4 774 C NOD OP r�iV(cf JI,`y�; /v c 17, ++ d ,`YRt .;".` :crwd tig, . . • ' (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER • Applicant Certification 77/141/472 I, £/ NA ,r o .J. lc-0 1z° , hereby certify that the-tire list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: O City of Renton Technical Services Records O Title Company Records [Ef King County Assessors Records Signed t1►' ,O H H�,'I ate /D -2 /- 99 (Applicant) ,,,, y',,, *1\TOTARY ATTESTED: Subs ribed and swoctt b fore rrImelingotari P:42lic, in and for the State of Washington, residing at �i oh' thOgAti agiof , 199 . Signed vyr�—+' * w•...........14 (Notary Public) �rrw/t/ ii 0���� tvG ........................................................:. daze...:: :..........................................:.........>:.;:;.;:.:;.;;;;:.;:;:.:::.>:;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;::.: �'< nd..fo.t t .<;::: :. :::.<.:>:s:' �.�ri ". : �'lit°: :iiiroeri:>:b.efote>m`e:'�:a>N: : a;:�;:P...biic'° ��..a....................a....x........q.....................g.Q::::;:.;:.;:.;;::: AT.TEST-.::::Subsc.:.bed..�.......5............:...::.::::.:::::::::::::..E::::::::::at.::.r..y::::..u....::::.:..�......... .....:.:::.:::.::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::: ::. :.:................ ........ �� I.... .............. ...4...................... .. .............. T.�::ti?:tiJ:":.�#.�f�::::::._::.::::::.:...rii.�.:::.:'�i:•ii:•i:•isv::::::^}'!;::::j:i:iii:{iiiih�i? :vvi:�vi ii?��>:v:tii'.�ij1'�ii:t:ijij;:%;'i,:±;i:;:;:;:;};.ii`��?i':iii i:v>.?•$i:4:�iiii:v:!i:;±::•:}iY.j':�'iiiij:4ii::L:?(,;,>.•,i:;i�:i:'}i4:4:�•iiii:4::iiY.':i'i":�':•ii:4ii:iLiii>i}}ii:?�i:v:•:4:hi:�?: i::;''`.;;.;''i::.,�.;.':;':;�.v;$isi:ii:>�����:'�i::�;:;i::'ii'iirii'�:::'i}i::i:i>:.�`.:i'v.>�'�iF'�i`'•it:`'�'rii:i:i:t:;i'.j:;:rt;:i;: i .:;..Y..;::�:.;.�:.'.:;::�:�::::v;:,t):r:iij:vi}:i::i::iii:'�i: .Al4F listprop.doc ` MARILYN KikiviCr iEFF REV07/95 NOTARY PUBLIC MARILYN KAMCHEFF 2 1 STATE OF WASHINGTON MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29.03 1 COMMISSION EXPIRES ( JUNE 29, 2003 to0 • 64 . .• .15A0 :•• : s• 4014• :•.f..•:••• • 049:•• • : •:::::•.:••••••••••:•::•:•:•:::::::0::, • .•••••" ••••"•s:. •••••::::.• •. •••• • •••• ..•• . :::•••• •::: . •,••• .. -• . • •• • •::. • ••• •• . : • •• •• • . • ••••• ••• :.:.::.:••••••• • • •• .•.••••• : •• . • • .... • •• • • . • 082305-9176-09 ACTIVE PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC 790503 COMMENTS CUSTOMER NO. PROPERTY TAX DEPT P0 BOX• • • ...••. . ..•• • • • .•••" . .•.: : . . • • • • • . • . BELLEVUE WA 98Q0 • •• • • • • • •.• • • 082305-9178-07 ACTIVE PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC 790503 COMMENTS CUtTOMBR NO PROPE1Y TAX DEPT • 1,.a ., : i01 *** •..ff:*• • ••••••••.7•. 4.-A.c kteit/oc.._c a.to art••:•••••• 4 F •-1.Cs , 0000 O • 0b2 • id ;;1 CUSTOMER 7—** • .... SEATT:t Mk :••• •,e:Ar7i.itrieli •• . . • • CUSTOMER NO 'ROPERT TAX DEPT •••••.*"..• • .f• •" .••••• .• • ••••: '" • :**• • . •'" •• :•• • *:*:*******)%.:::; BELLEVUE WA 98009 "sf.................................. ••••*•*: **** ' .:* O is:: :%:::•/%4T1.11. • E • E ::* . .• : SEATTLE WA 98124 ••*•• .•• •. ••••,", • .•• ••••• • * • * • * * :*•* *'%* • •'• . . 11 E..1 pip.0 icid 65-oc) .• •••••• -.........••••.•••••••::::•:••• • ••:: ••••••••••••::::;••:::: •••i:•••• • •-•• •• • • ••••••• CUSTOMER'• ::: • Eiox:, -7-63. :• ••.• . . . : • •••.: ••• • • . . SEATTLE WA 98124 •••••••..••••••.:;.,....f••:. •: • •••:•••••:•••••• *••• * . :"..••••:"::"'"•::::;:•-*::f*••••• ••••:.• **. •••.••. •••••:•••• :* • • '• * • • • • • ••••• e 65 • •:•• ••• ••• •••::•s• ..• .• : •CUSTOMER NO PD BOX $26 .". • • . . : :*: :* • ••••••• • RENTON WA 98055 •• .*•••. .................... i• : •• •.•:"..• ACTIVE THE u : . ....::•• SEATTLE WA 98124 .•:::;:••••••••••••••:::•::••••••.... "•::.•• •••• •.:•••*:"-**•••*:*•*fi:**•*:::::::•••• CUSTOMER NO tkTTN CORP ACCOUNTING . . . . . PO BOX 1518 BELLEVUE WA 98009 .•• . :•• •• • . : •:" •'•••• •• . : " •. *.*::.•• -•.. . '• " : . • •• • •: • : . . • " a f . . .. e te. • : ••••1••ff'di.u t•11-'‘I...:::'.......••••••••••••:•::1011• 1§g. .... . ... . .... •. .:.. . . f' • ' ''-- - -: •- •••••: '0. 5..A L'• :••:. p-44-6.1) •.E.::g •1'••••••!?•••••••••:•:...c:.U••.:. T••••°.•%61:: ::•-•::: •••'• .• i•-•.- ..• . • .... •••••• •:. 3::• • .-••••.:.•••. :••• ..%- .. . .• • ' . .• . ••. ...:.11 ••.:••$.. • PAGE -. . • 3 • AJOB..:. • ::i0:104Ci...i •:•:::•.„..**: ::...:1:.,::::.i;•••••....-•:'::-:::":•••!•:•••••• •i•:..............•••.•••..%•:..:%..i.:.1:••••:1•::..:.::•.':••:••.'.. . :••••••:•:::•••••- . .'.••.% ••:•••••••: •- . "". ":- • "" -• •••:::••.1.1'-..::.:•••:i•:::::.:,:•:::::?::;:•::::::;:?••••':... ••••• ....:.•:.,...-•. i -...: ... •,-• • .. .. . ..... . 722300-0105-00 ACTIVE 650035 COMMENTS . . . THE BOEING COMPANY .• .- .. .. 9 CUSTOMER NO PO BOX 3703 M/S #1F-0 .... .. : 24.....:..... ......,....,..:.:......::, ••.:::i:::..::::::::....i.:::::.gig.f• •:::.•••:::.:•••g:%••••••;-: .:::::::.::::..•::•:. .. .i.... ...:.:... .... • ...•. ....•....•.: • • .• • • •:. -. • . ,...... ...,.. :.....::.....:,......:.::.: :,,,.........ttATTLg..Wk.,......,:....i,,.'.:'':.,..:.:.::,:.-.....:-:.„:::...::-....::::.::.::...21::.::::,:.::.:;.0.!v.!.,.,:..................:::...:::::............:,..........:..........:......,..:.........,....,..:•..:............ ...... .......: ...............,. ...•:. .... .........: .. ::::.•..... . ... .....,.... . .:.........:...:.......... i.":.:....E.,:::...:::::::;:ii.::.:.'..:..:::::::.:::::::1:.:.::::1:::::::•••::::: ::.•:.::•1•:::.::.-2:::•:•••••...........:•. •..:.:•-:.:-.::::.• ••::::-...:,:••:::::::.••:•••:.•:"..;-:::•::•:.•••:":•:::.:•f.-:•:•.:".•:•:::—.::••:.!:::::.::-.....::::::::..............:..,..f.:... ......••••••:::::.-:.•.: :...,•:.••::-•••..•--: — .. •••:--:...,......:. .:.••• :.:::: : •• :.' "•..:•-•:•-•i:i:.•• •:-....:.:—•::•:::::-::::•:::...:.:::.:,:::::::.::::-.....:.•:. • . .. . . . . ..:. . • . .. ...........•,•. :... .:::.•••...........::. ...: ..-.•i..::::.i..:..,...,.....::•••••••::..;::•:::::.:::.:::'::•:.:.::.:-2.:f::::.:::::::.::::.:::::::;:ii:::::::::::::..............................::"..............:......::.:,...::::::-.:—........g.:...."....::.:::::::::....:::::: •••••••••••••••••.:•....::.•:. :::::.:„::::::::v..- -:.....•:.:::: :::.::, :.• ..:. ..:.:......:::.:..:,:.:•.•:.::...,:o.:.•...:.:.:.-i,•-.•:•:::',:•......:.,.1.:::,::•:.:.•••.........::::::...:.:.,..r... -..:•....::. f:::::.:.:••••:•:::.:":.::::::.:, ::...:.--::•::::.:::::::.:":•:....-:-:-::::.::::::::::::•:::....:•••:...::::.::.......:............::::.::.::::::::.:, ..:.:::::.::::. :•.::.::.::•:.:i::-:..::::•:.::::.:::.:.:..:::.:::::: :.::.:::•...;,:::::::::::.:::.•,...:::•.-•:::::::::::::•::::-:::-:..-:::-......:::::".....:.::....:::::::::::... .:::.•.•:.„..••: ,-. ... • : • • :..:.::::::::.:::.::i.::::.•••::::.::::::::::..::.:::.":.::::::.::.-:•:.:::::::::::::::::::,::::.::::::,.......:,:.::::...::.:.:.:......-.:::::.!:.::::::.::.:::...::::..,:.,::::::::::::::::„,::::.:.....::.::.:.....„......:„..:..,..:„:....:.:.:„.i„,.:.:::::.:.„:::..F..„.....,:::,..::,:.:,:....,...:..:,:..:.:.....:::::::.:::,::::.:,......,..,:::::.,.......,...,....:,...:.........„....:............. .. . .... . . . :•:•••••••::::i::::::.••••:•:::•:.::::•-:::•-•.::ti,::::•::••:::::::::::?:i::.::::::::::::::. ::.:::.:::i::•::•::•::::.,..,:..::,:,,:;.:........,•:...i.,..,..,..::::.......::...,.:........:.:.:::..:........::.:::. ,....::...:.,...:.::•••-....::.::::::::...:::::: ::•:::-.:". :.::::".......... •:•:::::.::,....-.:.:•:•:..•...,,,,, ..... .... . .. . .. ...„.......:.....:•:••••••••••••..,...::::.......f.•::: :.:::e.-::::.::::::::".:::.,::::.:::::::.,........... .•::::•••••,•:••••:..:::::1::.::::::::.-...:..:::.:::::.::•.•:.:::::::::.::::...e•....:::, :...: ...::::::.::::............:..:....:.:.::. .. ..:: . : . . :....:: ..-:•:::•:..::::.::::::.::::....::2. .....:::.:.::•:.:•:...::•••••••••,!••••••::•.:.:::::—. :::::: ::••••::::.•••...•:".......::........1::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:.::.:••...:......":.:•::. ...:: •• - . • :. •.:.:::. .::•...:•••..•...,::::...-.-::::::•:::::••••::.:..::::::•::•:..:..•......:••••.. . ............:::. :..::.: ••••:• -..:.:: • .. •.. • — . ••• . ." • ., ,•:.::.::.:::—.• ::.-....::•:::::::::„:...-:::•:.:::-•... :.:::. ...• .. •.., ::..:::: :::...::::.::e.,:.:..:.:::::-.•::::•::.:.:••..::-e..:....::::..„:::-....:.:.:e:.:......:••• :..:s..:. .::.•::::::::::..• •:-....:...- ::.••••••,..:....• :- •••• • •••.••• - :••• .:.:::..::::.:: ••• • .:::.::::::••••::.:::::"::•::::.::...:.-...• .. • . .. .. • -. . .......•..,...,.....,...::::•:. ••• . -..:::.--:::::::.:::::•••••-... :•:::::.:.•:•••::::-.•••••:-.:. :.•••.....:::ii. ........:•.::...":•.-.:-::::•:"......:;::::•.:-•,:.:-.:::• •••'......: ':. :::::....... • ..... .• . . : .. .• .. -: ;...:::- .: • . • -- -::.::.::::. .-.: .... :- ....,.....:•••:•:::::.•.:.::.•••'•:::.:•':. '::-: 1-::•.. .::. :.:. I.:::::•-;.:::!..1:::-:::::::::::::::::.......:•-•: :.--...::.•:-::•::•:..-::::::::::-.-.•::::::::: --.- : . :......:::•:.::::. ::„...::":::::::::•-::„....:•••:..:::::,-:::-.:•••:.:.: .•:::•••••:"••••:- • ..:•....::::•:::.•• .:.::.::•.".•::.•:•:••:'...:.- :..:••• .. • :.:":'- :. ••• • • - •• • • ...: :..: •• .::.::..-,-, •.:: :.: : .e: •: •-•-::: ...:::•:•.:...:. .:::::..:::.:„:.::.::.....:.. ::..-:.::::::-::::::,-::::::::::.:.:•:•::::::::::::•.:::::-::..:.•-.:...:..::::.::......:::-:::.:.,...:..•..:::........: • • • . . . .••• . . •:. :.- ••••:' :.:••:• :: •:::-:•:::::•••••:-:-:" '..... : •••...:.::-:::--:.::.::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::i....::::.::: .e... --.:::.::.::: - ..:.•• ..:...:..• ..... .. • • ,.... • ..,....:.•'... • •• .........:•.: -..:::..::•••::: :.::::.....- . . .:::: :.-::.:• :. :. • . -:" • ... •••• .. ..: .:.....:.::::..• ..::.......:::::,.:.•:::::::::: ..:: -.••...••:::::.••::::...,.:::::::::::.:::•.:—.":.:•••:•::::::•:::-.:::••:"-::•:::::::•:.'..:••••::.::.... ::.. ... :. —••...: :•...•:- •:.:.••••••.::::::: •:.:....:...": • -: .•::•.;-:e. , .••... • •-.:::::.:-.,•::::::. --:.::-.".. ...• ,:::::::-..,.::::.-•::.::•:::::...:...:::•-:.-•::: ":•:•::••••::::::.:.:-.•••---.:.....-•:..- • :•.•.- ••-...• • . .• .::..... .. :. ....-.::::..,:•• •...::-:. -: ".••:.• • .. : . .- . . - -.: :-. .. : •..,....:...,.:...:...::::.!:::::::::•...::!:-...-.....:::.:1::•.:-............:,.:".:.:....:.....• ....-.:•:......:.•••••:.::::,1....:::.::u.:•:. . --:...:..:-.:„.•:-.•.:-.,..:::::....::::::.:.•:::::::::„:••••.:::::::::.:•••:,:::•::::::•••••••:.•:::::::::::•:.:::::-:- ....-:••••••.• -:.. :•:.::".•:."•• •.•• ••••••• :":: ::••:: I:—:::::::••••••••'::::••••••••••• • ".•• . : • . ...... . .• : :.• • ::::"..::::,;•••. .---,...::.•:••:::::.• •-•:.:.:::•::•::::•:•••:: :•:::::.::::•:......•••:"..—— . • :::. - :..-- ::-::.::•- •••••..••• • .. ..:. :• . :•,:.: •:..•if::•:..."..:..........:, ,:::::..-::: .:::.::• ....:;::.e.•••:•••. .••:.:':::.......••••••::..:.....:::•..•••:.....•:.i:•::••:•::........T"::'i•.:::. ...;.:.::::::••11.1.:•••' ....1:•:••••::...g.::::g.•::::—•—••..i.;.:.•'•••e::". •••f:.i::•.• •••—:.:• .. ' •:':•.::::.':'.. :.: .........'• •.:•.;—............:," ..:. :: •;• ..,.:.i...:..Z..:::::.:i.............:::;•:•..:•:.:i.....::?:::::........;••..::::.:.:f::i::i•if:'•••.:.....:.........•••—•:.::/... .3... :, •::....:........ ......f......."....'.................::......:.:.:"."•"....•—...•... ••••••:...::.::••••••::•:•::'.•::.:"•—•.•:::::.:::.•:.:::':.::::::::.i...::"ii:::.::.:!::::Ye•;';:::%:.::•:••'...:. :. :::::•::::•"i•••::::::•'•:.::'•%%••••••........::.:.: .•. .:::. .. • :'. ."'•ei:•::•••• —•'•..•e• •...—•.........••:;.•:•.:"Sw•••••;.'"...'2'•'••••—.:—...— ...:.:.•"."....":."""....•:...••••••••••••••••••::......C.:::.i.....i.:":::;.:'.:•• •.......t:....."..i''....::•: :•..:::•.... .:.::::..:.::•:::•:::••:::•:::. •:•:..:•:•:::::....::'•:::::::.......:.....";.— .. —• . •• . • ....."—...'.....:."•:..........".•:e:".::•••..—..•:::.••••:".•:...:::::::':::' ."•••.:.....:•.,•:.•."....:. •'......":.:•:::!..:..:..........":.:•••::::::.'.:.—•••••:.—•.:''..:••..'•.:•:•.:e,•':'"•—•. —— • . . .. .. .........•....• ""'•• • .--::::":::.:.::•.:•"::.:'.::::::::.:'... :":... •.:.—•:: :•......:.:•:::'''::::•:i!•••;•••••i:.::::::::e ': . :.•.•:: :.ie..••::•i. .•:.".•:::."::.e.:::••••••:•:..:...::••••:.:"........ •:............'• ..:•.::•:.:.::::::. :.: .....": .'•. . .....:. . • • i:•••••::..• — —.::.. •"... :.....:::::i:::::::...•::::..::::•:''.'"•::.••••::•..'•...."...• •::•::.:...•:::::.'::::"..:•::::: ...::......" — ': *: .:•.' ..:::•—•••i.: :..'"•• • ..... . .:•....'. —....: .......:.'.'.•:•:.••:.:.•••••••:••••.. ....•::::: ".::.:.•'...:;.... . e.. •.. : .. • • • .............•••....... •:...—..:.:"i:.:::• ........•;.:.::.....;:',...::P.::::•::. • :::.:'• :' :•:••••: •..i.':,• •.:."...."; . : . : • .• . •"•".:::::::'' '..• •••••• ..... —:: •••;":::.".: . •••::•.:•"•: ..•......:. ... .........:.:i.:'•:•::.......••••••'.•• ' ::%—:.•:•.•:::. .•".... .." • •• ••.. .. '•'. ...":.%—..:.......:':::••••••••,:*.. ..: • ••••i'i•:.....•;•.•••.:.:f••:•:•:•:•:•.":'.':;:i'''.......i:::•:•...•:"e':.•::•:.....: ..............• •":.....—.....::." ....:•::•::•••:::•• .1; ... .""•.• '..i':: •:•: e... . •.. :......:..:<.e....:: •• : :.. :'::••:••':•••"'":"':::::::...::;•::.:•..:•..•:••••:........:. :'e• ...:".. ... ••••• :.. •::••••:f .:•'...::........:•:•.•i....: ...: • "•:•:::%•:":.•.•':':•" '.::':........f.i.:.:.........:•••:.......:..::... ': . ..•• : .• —. .".e .... . .. ..::—........ '••f••'• .•• "e.: • • .. •.. . ..'.".•" .. !1:.••••••:.i.::::::•—•......:::...:::::::::.::.::::::...:ii...:•.•.:.....•:::::::::::.::::.•..i:::::•.•.::;•:..i.1•••.:.•1.i.:::•......:•...,..:.::.:::.:':. ,:f:e•::•.:::•:::•••1;:.:e:•••:..........:••: "::':.....e::•.•.••••••:.•:•:.:•:::•::::••:::•:•'....—.":.%: •• •••:.•• ••••.• :•.:•::••:.....•::....V. ••••••••.•::ei•.•• —:.;.••••••.•:.2. •.. '' ". • . •• •"::• • .... •—."" • • .. :.:... .•; ..':•••••••,..............:::::......:.::•..:';'...:.::...:::.;......":::.•:::•:.— '''•:. :::....::i..::.:'•'.;•'.:.....:".......••e:•::•.••••••••." •'''• ..•:••• :•"— •••••••'.••••• " . . • • '. "• • ' " • • . . . ..: ,......:........ —..,:f.•:::':•::::::::—...:::,.:::••••::::::.:.......e......:::.••':.........................i:;•.'i •::•:..i:•••••:••••••.•:••::...I.:.:•.*:::.. •........i.••••••.••:1•:••.....••....•;•...::'..:•.•'•.•.• 1 • ' ... .•• • . ;• •••••••f..•••••:—. .. ••••• • . ' • G1 SY O� Comments on the above application must be submitted In wilting to Ms.Lesley Nishihira,Project Manager,Development C;� Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on December 1,1999.This matter is also ®♦ scheduled for a public hearing an January 11,2000,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Seventh Floor,Renton City Hall, I .A 10155 South Grady Way,Renton.If you are interested In allending the heating,please contact the Development Sentces "r�N��� Division,(425)430.7282,to ensure That the hearing has not been rescheduled.II comments cannot he submitted in writing by the date Indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal • NOTICE OF APPLICATION before the Hearing Examiner.If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a pally of record and receive additional Information by mail,please contact the protect manager.Anyone whecto submits written comments will AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- automatically becomeaparty orrecodantico°°era°linedol any dedalan era thisprowjh SIGNIFICANCE(DNS) CONTACT PERSON: LESLEY NISHIHIRA(425)430-7270 I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE: November 17,1999 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-155 SA-H,ECF APPLICATION NAME: BOEING PARKING LOT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Boeing Company is proposing the development of a 2,727-stall parking lot on a 22.46-acre site for company employees.The total area of proposed pavement Is approximately 879,510 square feet Also included MA the proposal Is approximately 90,36e square feet of landscaping to be distributed throughout the exterior and interior of the site. The subject property was previously developed with the 10-60 and 10.65 buildings,which were recently approved for demolition under project no.LUA-99-121,ECF. - PROJECT LOCATION: 800 Perk Avenue North OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE(DNS):As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has - •• 'm,'0� determined that significant environmental Impacts ere unlikely to result from the proposed project.Therefore,as // _ permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS process to give notice that a DNS is ;-• - .. ' 11, �\ 1) , likely to be Issued,Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS are Integrated into a single comment period. ---:•,-....;-,.,.,;,-,‘,..: \ 1\•••:, /d- �\ ): There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated �••I'r:, w t t jy" • (DNS).A 14-day appeal period will follow the Issuance of the DNS. `(1I 1ft - _. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: November 4,1999 " ��y 0. r mti 1° NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: Novimber 17,1999 E 1 • Q I ,,,, r•-0 t4\tNEWeomua5,�:.. t lit+, PANmtO LOTSITE Permits/Review Requested: Envirenmental(SEPA)Review,Hearing Examiner Site Plan Approval „I Vd`„� , y \�\ Other Permits which may be required: Construction Permits II, � Q \�tili.�l) ♦, 0, � Il 111 um Requested Studies: Drainage Report,Traffic Study I n ri T 6 Location where application may a• O 1 _ t. .`� -�s� co ao Di r *1 be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, o (� !/'- �, I it 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 - 1 I jr 1 1 ry 7I 1 Y(•� i� I �11��1 wfy� _.�-1f���1II(; L1�td�Yg I III PUBLIC HEARING: Public heating scheduled for Tuesday,January 11,2000,before the Renton I I r - 9,-'- Y I p--II 3 1\\ -- Hearing Examiner in Renton Council Chambers.Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on I n i ':�I � I)I{,, L •r�y, the 7th Boar of the new Renton City Hall located at 1055 Grady Way South. a I i :3 1 I(rfj.')1 -1 ...I.:: ,a i,Iii ,544, - 1 Ii;' CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: • !I j.-'I I S', , '- ,:, I li - - - 91 i e1ft. \,P 4 Land Use: The subject site Is designated as both,Employment Area-Industrial and �JIL�I:!3 oC7� . Employment Area-Office,on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. f n ll till The site Is also located within the Heavy Industrial OH)and Commercial Office T _car. • (CO)Zoning'designations.The proposal Is consistent with these designations. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: N/A 11 Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The project will be subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance,Zoning Code,Public Works Standards,Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. Proposed Mitigation Measures: At this time,the review of the proposal does not reveal any probable significant impacts requiring mitigation above and beyond existing code provisions.However,further analysis of the development may reveal the need for additional mitigation measures. NOTICE OF APP • NOTICE OF APP CERTIFICATION I, !� icA-6%).�7 u , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on ,Niov� a 1S , 1 ciel j • 1 11Signed: ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public, an or the State of Washington residing in� Q g� , on the �.ti day of 9`35 • MARILYN KAMCHEFF NOTARY PUBLIC y-�C�)-�- ` . STATE OF 1NASHINGTON N ��"' COMMISSION EXPIRES �/ JUNE 29,2003 • MARILYN KAMCHEFF • r MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 ' II � s� 0 -NTQc:)' NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DATE: November 17,1999 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-155,SA-H,ECF APPLICATION NAME: BOEING PARKING LOT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The.Boeing Company is proposing the development of a 2,727-stall parking lot on a 22.46-acre site for company employees. The total area of proposed pavement is approximately 879,510 square feet. Also included with the proposal is approximately 90,368 square feet of landscaping to be distributed throughout the exterior and interior of the site. The subject property was previously developed with the 10-60 and 10-65 buildings, which were recently approved for demolition f under project no.LUA-99-121,ECF. PROJECT LOCATION: 800 Park Avenue North OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE(DNS): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS process to give notice that a DNS is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated (DNS). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: November 4,1999 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: November 17,1999 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Hearing Examiner Site Plan Approval Other Permits which may be rel uired: Construction Permits Requested Studies: Drainage Report,Traffic Study Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing scheduled for Tuesday,January 11,2000,before the Renton Hearing Examiner in Renton Council Chambers. Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on the 7th floor of the new Renton City Hall located at 1055 Grady Way South. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use: The subject site is designated as both,Employment Area—Industrial and Employment Area—Office,on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The site is also located within the Heavy Industrial(IH)and Commercial Office (CO)Zoning designations. The proposal is consistent with these designations. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: N/A Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The project will be subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance,Zoning Code,Public Works Standards,Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code and other . • applicable,codes and regulations as appropriate. • Proposed Mitigation Measures: ' At this time,the review of the proposal does not reveal any probable significant impacts requiring mitigation above and beyond existing code provisions However,further analysis of the development may reveal the need for additional mitigation measures. NOTICE OF APP omments on the above application must be submitted in wr o Ms.Lesley Nishihira,Project Manager,Developn• ervices Division,1055 South GradylWay,Renton,WA 9800D,uy 5:00 PM on December 1,1999. This matter is als , ;:heduled for a public hearing on January 11,2000,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Seventh Floor,Renton City Hall, 055 South Grady Way,Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services livision,(425)430-7282,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in rriting by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal efore the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and aceive additional information by mail,please contact the project manager. Anyone who submits written comments will • lutomatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. 1 ;ONTACT PERSON: LESLEY NISHIHIRA (425)430-7270 'LEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I I I J)f e IH — — \+G PUCET SOUND POWER p IH h UGHT COWAN,' '3 Vz V , " \_____\___v_ 1 q , silysttLfr IOsHEVNNMNPC lOT 'o1,,p4,r I,��_ Q .CO a(� �� I 11 ���0c��� � NEW BOEING /1�''C ` \`� A .4i 1'� PARKING LOT SITE ,...{� "sue o n , a Dom PAMC LOT ,. r _ 11 TO ROM 1 d1��� L� r__r R V RAILROAD u El ,, .....,,,,r- ' CO 'I x U u a% Ii r d==�-4 6. ----;4 fI 0 o IH r I__I O ( GI r1\ts+n: / 1 ` .1 ..I`, iL"�1I PACCAR I - 1 I VVV2 4 1 IH rl I _[-,-.11,\-11 iIf _. I ,x9- 'Z/ ,, UeuC, .... n iiflll . NOTICE OF APP. 1 t: CITY -=IF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator November 17, 1999 " Mr. Rick Ford The Boeing Company PO Box 3707, M/S 19-35 Seattle, WA 98124 SUBJECT: . Boeing Parking Lot Project No.LUA-99-155,SA-H,ECF Dear Mr. Ford: : .The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has-.determined that the subject application is complete according to;submittal requirements and, therefore, is - accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on December 14,1999. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional"information is required to continue processing your application. The date of Tuesday, January 11, 2000, at 9:00 a.m., has been set for a public hearing to review the above-referenced matter. The hearing, before Mr. Fred Kaufman, Renton Hearing Examiner, will be held in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA. The:applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be maile4d to you one week before the hearing. Please contact me, at (425) 430-7270, if you have any questions. Sincerely, 477..s-T27, Lesley Nishihira Project Manager - . 1055.South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 • - •- - . , ,' This oaeer contains 50%recycled material 20%;cost consumer _ .. ..- };�{?>?:::.:>;;:.}}:.}}:.::::.}•.:';>:::}}}:.::;,}}}::.:?.}::::}}:.}:{:::n.:.:::::::::.:'i;.:.i>.}:. ::::::::...r.�.:;:k::ktri:}::}r;::<;:.};i•:.;.:::::::{.i:{.:.t:.}:.;>i},}:i.>:<.}}}}:;::t:{{.;:.}:;.} .?................... .v:4.;�rrr.........n. : ......................r.......,....k ..... .. ..... ..v..vt....n....w,v•.vv^}:?::???:vnw:{}v::•Y.:: :.}}}'.Y•}}}}r}}Yfi?v;..4• :) ..........f..........n.n...n Y..Y ....,.. ................... ..?....... ::n:.........,..r.n..........• .�-y::::::'::}:{t}:ifv':.:Jiiii':}i:•.:v.:v:n:.v::::::::::: • :::.:h...................n....................n..v:::::...f...\..r..v:;.:;nr... ...•}....... •::.v.S}::•v n::;?i.r.. x.n.:x:n.......... .......r: :::::fry,.::::: .. iMil. . ..igg x.....:..rrw::::::...........,.n}}}:.ig•�}}}}:4}}}}•ii t.... t. t C.vw::k•:}::ry}4...~.....:.....::... .n.......}.:C....t.:.:v?n w::n.ff............. . .r............r.............................::xx::::x::::.vv::.?•i:..�:::::..r...: :....:• ......t........................................... ...:.........n......., .... v...n.•;...:4.:v.v:::::; :{:::x•v::..v::..v........}....:.vr+.v:::m::::: .•x::::: :x:•:::.v::::y:::.:w:x:::•:::::x.:v.v:u::::w:::::::::.v....:::::v. .vvrn;x.v:::::::::::::.:v:::n::::.:nv.•:.w:^::n.........v .......... ....�kirttit•}:f.}.•::; .. .:. ...•};v:•}?'•%•}::?{?�......... ..:m:;:}:.}:?::w:::n:.n•:.n:r.:.:::rn;.....:..::::::::tr:........:.. ;::::::::::. 4.............. , .�+ryp ........rw:rw;{.}::•}i. ..........:.........x:.:.vn:....:.::::n:.v..........::.:v::n:::..;.......... :::::::::::::::::w:::::::::::::::.:::::n........ wx.....+.:..v.::i..?•:::::::r::r�.:..•ivx:::::n•}•:x:: ' .::::..:.n::•:•w::;�•:. .::f•:v::..n::nw:;;�.m:;v:;F,.::?:+::::::::::r.:w:::v.v:::::::n.....nw:::x ............ ........................{C..............v........ .. ?.}.: .:.::•. ::•:�?v+/.^:::x..v:::nv.-..:....4...•::}ftv::::.:::::::::::w:?n4::nv:r:{w.v::nv.v:w::rw:::::::::::iG}::::::::::: ..::::w::::::::::::::x::::::::::•:v:::::::;:w::;;......;....n:::nw::::t::.tt.::v::n}.}::}: ::'.vv In ... :.....n...........................:.............:......:::v•....:.................... ..�.y�.�.,:+v i w:;:....v......v..v........,..v........................w::::::::..........................................:.::.vY:.v. }}:::w::::::;.•w:ww.w::::::::::::.v::}::{::n}i'?{::{;tk::::::.Y:::{•k::ii}:•}:LC{'k:?y}}}:?:?...::...:..... ......;•.;.••v;:}:•.::i::.v.:...........•v t.....:.v{:;?v;}:::w:}}}:m:::tnY.:.{::::::..n:...:. .. :.:...;.:....•r t.....:. ..}.. .vv?: v::{i:::.}': :''>i:}::'ris::i::::i::::ti : : :i::::::::::: };}}::�:.DE�ELt�.PM. . NT •::�:::»:<:.}.i::::: }:?.:.:::.;i:?.:::i>iiiii:.}}:.}::::.}:.i:.}}:.}:.ii::.}i:.}:.}}}:::}:.}>}::>}:.}::.i:.}>::k::k:><::>:::;;>;:;>:<:;::»::>::»::»>i:::»:?;.::.: F ►•••• { Viti i 1:tilt a: i•C:i}}<:?;.:>y1}::.X?a•:}:i;.:. :$s ' iMiii • vvnr� .......................... }} :tt{..}}:�}}:<.:?�i}{.:{.:?iii{{i.:::.::iii}:ii{.:�}:.:??.::�}}} :t.i:»:i>iii::.>.:;i::}::i:????>.::::::.:::>•:::>::<>:::>::>:<::>::::<:::::>::>::>::::>::> :ii<{iiii{.i:.i;.:.}}:.}:.}:.}}}:: ............................... . .::.ii:.;:?.i:.ii}::.::.:.ii:.i:.i:..:....:..:.:........... ..................... ................... Sl:.::::n.:n..�:::..................... >>>» � >� > > ..:�•���'�� �C'�' �►v�< �:�1f11' :::: ��� :::::»: ><::::>::::�:::: ::::::::;::: ....:.}'.:.;:.i}i:....:.�'.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.::::.:.:.:_:.:.:}::.::::::..:.i:.:?.i>i::?.:}:.:"::.:�:.:.}:.:i.:.:.i:.:.:i:.i}:::::.::._.:?t{{?:{:::_}:{:.:.:??.:.;.:.}:.}:i:.:.i.:.i..ii;.i}}::?.: .,..............:.,.:..:::::..,.:::::..:::.:.:::.:.::::::::.:.,.:: :::.:.::..:{.:{{.:.i:.}:.i:t.:.:..}:.:?t.i:.::: Note;:(f there ja roots thai one:=regal owner4 please attac1 ari additional'.: iim.4.0amaiweiiaiegoi$61 .awsaiswiiiikesentamosionsa PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: i- - - 60E/Nt /4,Z.1C/iv4 L0 r . /fJE 60E/A(6 et). PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: PO BGx .3707 Ml5 /s7-39 7-H /3,c),6'/NG RE",sero w /74Aivr 0D0 P.4,ee A VE /`,/• 12awn',/v, 1,1/,4 CITY: !6 64 7 7.5/ 14/4 ZIP: 9'B/Z4 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): • • ORZ3DS - 90D/ • TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND USE(S): 20(0. (o$S ' C188� LOrr��E.- i4 . A-/,ee2,4Fr S • •:;: ...::C.:.:.T tt�rth ar tE�a>vwn ner3: ::•<:> /N L s EAs4 6 L r PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: • COMPANY(if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: /.vD vs T4 iA G - Liw pLb y.h 6,v T- ADDRESS: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): CITY: ZIP: EXISTING ZONING: /-1"/ 7 � D � � TELEPHONE NUMBER: • • PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): �® . dj� �� d- ,, .��•..•.:.} ??{`:::•�:�i'-LY}�:::•,i �•ii:,Ly.':l{:;i:?:}}::::ii��tv�Y$�?�i:}':i::Ci�����Li��:jii}i'+ii::':':�: • O ii'::kis:::::::::!}i;ij';kvji:i<;?*ii i:}jj;jkt:.• .:.........:...::........:.::..:::..:::��.. rN�t',AST}.P.��SOt1F:..::....... . �b��,i'E^"°•, q,t.7 ,4. SITE AREA(SQ.FT. OR ACREAGE): I ` ® 'P(` NAME: ,L' >-p,e ��. , 1 � d i.ti, 22. . - 442�S �� ;' : • COMPANY(if plicable): ®J� *► i. • PROJECT VALUE: • ADDRESS: -#4101,�RA lip �ye�%` IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? PB /3ax 37D 7 /41/5 /9.3 . CITY: �VD • ZIP: ,. IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE.OF ENVIRONMENTALLY ... 'E4 ri-4 G✓ A 98/2 4- . • SENSITIVE AREA? TELEPHONE NUMBER: \ 0 Z©6 ' �6�;-.9BBf� / Y >��L A ..DE ..::::::::::: .:::::::::::::::.:...::..::...:::::. �?11)..£�F..PRE�PERT'Y:. A ach> = i��i!a���si�:e:eti°f���n.�:ces��r`:: • Mii:iiT`•:PE:.:, . E:./�. !.:i•.y?iii:}�i:{4i::: .::. :i:.: S.:'."'i?::i'?;•':i.:.:i::•••::::::i:i'::r:::::::::?::ii:::�rii'�ii: .i::::Mii.i:ry'':'';ii:ii:::ii::::'::::`:::; ::i:: :>iiiii:::;isii:i:::::<::::i::;:ii:i:i:::i:i:i:<:i•:i:ii:i<:i:; ... . �PL�. A . . ::::::>::i>::::i:::<::::i:i::ii::i:::i:i:::<:::;:i:<:;::i::is::::;:.::;::::<:::i::: :;::<::_::,:i,:.:i::ii :::.._::.h ..:k;:: ri<:: :;:iiii::i::i:::i::i::::::i::i::::�::ii::i::i::i::::i::: ...G .ec...�...... c t. .:� ..:.' :�< ;>. ,.: .....at o .... ( ..... ffw)I . ..:: . .:..:..::::ii::i:«;i::i:::::::::ii:<:::>�:::>:::::<:::»::>:<:>::::> ..;.:::.::.:::.::.::.;:,:.::.:.;:.:.;:.;;:.:.;;:.;:.; . . ........ . ea..t....a:t.a . .. . rm)n. :::if . ;;�:.;.;:.:.;:.:.:.;::.:.;i::.;;ii:. :.:.::::::::.. _ANNEXATION $ . ' SUBDIVISION: _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ —REZONE $ _LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _ SPECIAL PERMIT - $ • _SHORT PLAT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ . CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ 7 SITE PLAN APPROVAL . $ OEI'3_'--- _ FINAL PLAT $ _ GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: ) . PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ 1 _VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY _WAIVER $ FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT $ ROUTINE VEGETATION — MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: _ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE . $ _VARIANCE $ / — EXEMPTION $No Charae V ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ S of,r-`" REVISION $ I, (Print Name) As./1 RE' J. .Fort,,,declare that I am(please check one)— ' ,Xthe authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization), • and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my kn g�egge.e41belief. ATTEST: Subscribed+ it •7 o before"�� tary Public,in and 1 Z. ti'Q 2 V .J 7C-0 AZ D fort Stat of t (Name of Owner/Representative) ,� ,o t May pf i I,,.//,--if (§C � 19 t ."r. _= w oo, 11)• 1 (Signature of Owner/Repr entative) %' 44 ®� 4�� (Si -adVof Notary Pu.flj STA�\, :;:ii:ii:i:i:::::::::i:::i::::i:::::::::::>:::::::::::::::::>: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::>;: : x:»::>:<:<:><:<>_«:::: :$ ::>: ::; ..:.:.x.::>::::::>:: ::,..: : :: ...,.:..:...:>:: ":.... :.:.,:' >: ii:: :::<:ii::ii:::>:::i>:::i:::::<:i::i::i::>::i:<:::i::::::::>::;::>»i::iii: :>:;::ii::::�::ii::>i::;i::i:::i::i Thf:,.:'s:ecftortto)).:e? a:::: ..;.::.;:.::.>:.;:,.; ::.;:.;: ,::.:.;:.::.;:;:.;>;.i.::.:.i:::.;.:.;:::;.;<.:..:::::::.::::::::::.. .. .. lX1 .I.etecI.::b::::.,0.:.i: •••••• ----- ------...,:..::. .. •.>;:.::.::.:.:.;:.;:.;:.::.;:=..• :.:.: ....... .:.;•::... .::.:::;i i:!:i�;:::. .;�. ..: r:•>i:•:i�<... ...::;.:::.;::�.::.;;:.;: <:�.:.:.::;:i: ..>;:.:.:, .:.: .:: ..�._: ..:�.: �.;�;:.::.:>: � :::.:.;:;:i::'..:.::';:is'iii i;.;;,....;,::::'::: ..<..:. . .:::.:�.;::�.;:•. : ;.,... .... ............................................... � .:,:::......... .............� .........�.........�.......�P.. ...... AA.....Ct ::A�.;:.;�.:C. -(-I:.::.;:ECG::::LtA:::::::>::::>::::::::<: • :::.:.:::::::::.;: ...0 _ i.iii.. _„ 'v�;::;:>;.:�:<:.:::::::::::::. . .•.;:E:'�k''•'f•:�:E:E:;�'%':i:i';5i-ri.;:.;x;::;�:x%�i iSi::x.•:i:•::ii iii3:::::::::ifi;:;>o-::;:::•t::ii::r;_:%r:>::::;%�i:%8::%:;:ii:.':i;•:;>;::;,i::ip>:,:;::.sa:,':.::::: .. .�'. . .... .,.r......r.....�.....tS..�,V.4o:::>::::i.a.,..5.:�.1:: :;��:'J.r'�::-r..�•:g.6. ::: -...::i:< 7 :i>M.. :::::. ‘ -10:>::::::»::i':- ;::ip;::_:><::::> :-: <>::> .:>::;:. ... O`tAL P(iSTACE PRa1tIDED..:::#..:::F}:::: ::... .:. :.::..: .:>::::.:..:�.,.:: :..::::.::....::::: MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 8/97 A-D- 4. r -5 op DESCRIPTION �Ty � ilT OF THE ®`�RFfPL11',�,�I� BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE COMPANY �''°�9® T��d �� 9 RENTON PLANT FACILITY PARCEL I-80 CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON . 1 The following described tract of land is the resultant consolidation of Record; Title vested in the Boeing Company, a Delaware Corporation and Puget Sound Power & Light Company, a Massachusetts Corporation, covered in thelPioneer National Title Insurance Company, Limited Liability Reports Number A-253801 , A-253802, A-253803, A-253804, Unit 13, dated January 11 , through January- 21 , 1980. ALL BEARINGS ARE REFERENCED TO THE GRID MERIDIAN OF THE WASHINGTON COORDINATE SYSTEM, NORTH ZONE. THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOTS 1 AND 3 IN SECTION 7; AND OF GOVERNMENT LOTS 1 , 2 AND 3 AND THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; AND OF C.H. ADSIT'S LAKE WASHINGTON PLAT AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 8 OF PLATS, PAGE 79, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; AND OF BLOCK C, THIRD, SUPPLEMENTAL MAP OF LAKE WASHINGTON SHORE LANDS, AS RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 5927582; AND OF CERTAIN SHORE LANDS OF LAKE WASHINGTON SHOWN ON SHEETS 3 AND 4 OF THE MAP PREPARED BY UDO HESSE UNDER KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 156371 ; AND OF VACATED LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD (FORMERLY PARK STREET) ; AND OF THE ABANDONED BURLINGTON NORTHERN INC. RAILWAY (FORMERLY NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY) RIGHT-OF-WAY, ALL MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH MARGIN OF SIXTH AVENUE NORTH AND THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF COMMERCIAL WATERWAY DISTRICT NO.2 IN GOVERNMENT LOT 2 OF SAID SECTION 7; THENCE WITH SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE NORTH 12°47'42" WEST 193.18 FEET; NORTH 00°22 '54" EAST 454.50 FEET; NORTH 12°47'42" WEST 2394.32 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK C, SAID THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL MAP OF LAKE WASHINGTON SHORE LANDS; THENCE WITH THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID BLOCK C, NORTH 12°47 '42" WEST 264.08 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE CONTINUING WITH THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID BLOCK C, NORTH 84°25'26" EAST 1299.96 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF, BEING ON THE INNER HARBOR LINE OF LAKE WASHINGTON SHORE LANDS IN SAID SECTION 7; THENCE WITH SAID INNER HARBOR LINE NORTH 46°52'27" EAST 977.56 FEET; -1- Y P PARCEL I-80 (Continued) THENCE WITHIN SAID SHORE LANDS SOUTH 43°06'56" EAST 932.91 FEET; SOUTH 46°53'04" WEST 220.00 FEET; SOUTH 31°37'32" EAST 448.37 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF SAID BURLINGTON NORTHERN, INC. RIGHT-OF-WAY IN GOVERNMENT LOT 2 OF SAID SECTION 8; THENCE WITH SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY SOUTH 50°41 '48" WEST 248.33 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT OF RADIUS 12,769.67 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY WITH SAID CURVE (THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0°10'00") 37.15 FEET TO THE POINT' OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH'A' CURVE TO THE LEFT OF RADIUS 6409.84 FEET; THENCE SMITH- WESTERLY ALONG SAID COMPOUND CURVE (THROUGH. A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0°20'00") 37.29 FEET TO THE POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH A CURVE TO THE LEFT OF RADIUS 4289.90 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID COMPOUND CURVE (THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0°30'00") 3,7.44 MEET TO THE POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH A CURVE TO THE LEFT OF RADIUS 3229.93 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID COMPOUND CURVE (THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0°40'00") 37.58 FEET TO THE POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH A CURVE TO THE LEFT OF RADIUS 2593.96 FEET; THENCE SOUTH- WESTERLY ALONG SAID COMPOUND CURVE (THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0'°50'00") 37.73 FEET TO THE POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH A CURVE TO THE LEFT OF RADIUS 2169.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID COMPOUND CURVE (THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF O1°00'00") 37.87 FEET TO THE POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH A CURVE TO THE LEFT OF RADIUS 1867.13 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID COMPOUND CURVE (THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF O1 °10'00") 38.02 FEET TO THE POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH A CURVE TO THE LEFT OF RADIUS 1639.99 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID COMPOUND CURVE (THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF O1 °20'00") 38.16 FEET TO THE POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH A CURVE TO THE LEFT OF RADIUS 1482.69 FEET; THENCE SOUTH- WESTERLY ALONG SAID COMPOUND CURVE 140.74 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID NORTHWESTERLY MARGIN FROM WHENCE THE CENTER OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 50°44'31 " EAST; THENCE WITHIN SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY NORTH 53°32 '36" EAST 854.31 FEET; NORTH 49°53'02" EAST 606.40 FEET; SOUTH 44°22 '57" EAST 25.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH- EASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID RAILWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY, SAID POINT BEING SOUTHEASTERLY AND RADIAL FROM THE MAIN TRACK CENTERLINE SURVEY STATION 1068+00, SAID POINT BEING ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT FROM WHENCE THE CENTER BEARS NORTH 44°22'57" WEST 1639.99 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY WITH SAID CURVE (THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00°24'45") 11 .81 FEET TO THE POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH' A CURVE TO THE RIGHT OF RADIUS 1867.13 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID COMPOUND CURVE (THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00°40'33") 22.02 FEET TO A POINT FROM WHENCE THE CENTER OF SAID CURVE BEARS NORTH 43°17'39" WEST, SAID POINT BEING ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO.1 (SR 405) NORTH RENTON INTERCHANGE; -2- 7 r . 1 PARCEL I-80 (Continued) CONTAINING 204.17 ACRES, OR 8,893,560 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. REFERENCE IS HEREBY MADE TO OWNERSHIP MAPS, RENTON PLANT FACILITIES, 1980 PROPERTY CONSOLIDATION, SHEETS 1 , 2, 3, 4, 5 AND 6 OF 6 SHEETS. • -4- r :ING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE C____PANY • A DIVISION OF THE BOEING COMPANY RENTON PLANT FACILITY 1 ,_ PARCEL 1- 80 8,893,560 SQUARE FEET • 204.17 ACRES hi 600 300gm OM 001 0 6 00 120C ;Soo • II . SCA LE IN FEET CITY OF RENTON KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN • T23N • R5E ).. 6 --- - : FOR EXCEPTION GI SEE EXHIBIT DRAWING # :/ BY H.O.$A. DATED 3.1O•80 i ARE . INN S 7 �Q O f t�a Iz2 1 • B v" , 25 NORTH NEWTON INTLRCNAMSE I- 80 �, 1 9 I 1 27 2 I I IB r)' , 7a BURLINGTON NORTHERN C i C .I RAILROAD RIGHT Of WAY Sz i • o r '.1k • a ‘,..._..-- u 4 O / II\t[,41 ~ 1 s tilt,. 11 _� ,l• O i z s. C. \ 4i.. ✓ M I { P� p M �� ..l , ' O u roTH fTRILT / 0 NK4 Sr11, SEC..B.). A 1: .. 1 , 3 ® 35 ; 32 34 \ I 1 V .. _ 11-0,• "45 7 I. •� l • 37 36 - - 0 : 1 ! 7n:a (aI DEVELOPMENT PLANNING Project Name: Parking Lot 3 Construction CITY OF RENTON Property Owner: Boeing Company OCT 2 1999 RECEIVED Construction Mitigation Plan: The project proposed is the development and construction of a 2,727-stall parking lot in the area where the recently demolished 10-60 and 10-65 buildings stood. The parking lot will serve Boeing employees only. The building site will consist of approximately 23 acres, located at the Boeing Renton Plant. Construction activities are scheduled to commence upon completion of the permitting and approval process by the City of Renton. This is anticipated to be in February 2000. Construction activities should take about 6 months to complete. This includes general grading of the site to maintain the current and adhere to the design storm water flow patterns and storage capacities. Construction activities are anticipated to be conducted on one shift but in the event an unanticipated event, two shifts may be necessary, if so, the resulting hours of op-eration would be 6:00 am to 11:00 pm. Construction transportation activities will not impact employees to the west because construction related ingress and egress would be done mainly at the Garden Avenue and 8th Street,driveways. Construction employees will also use these ingress and egress points. Traffic impacts are not anticipated to be significant due to the low estimated traffic volumes. Several measures will be put into place to minimize potential impacts. These include, watering,,of the site to control dust, and silt fences and hay bales to control potential runoff. li • Project Narrative Parking Lot 3 Project Name: New parking lot construction, Boeing parking lot No.3 Size: 978,018 total square feet Location: Corner of Park Ave. No. &N. 8th St. and Garden Ave on the east. Zoning: The site is zoned Heavy Industrial and Commercial Office. Current use of the site: Building used as aircraft assembly and support office will be demolished in November and December of 1999. (LUA-99-121,ECF) Special features: None Soil: The soil is sandy silt loam. Proposed use: To construct a 2,727 stall parking lot with a total paved area of 879,510 square feet. Total area of landscaping is 90,368 square feet. The area of interior landscaping is 36,585 square feet or 5 % of the project. The remaining utilities building will have a total square footage of 8,140. Proposed off-site improvements: None proposed Estimated Cost: $4 million Excavation and Fill: Only minor grading and filling is anticipated as the site was graded as part of the earlier demolition. Trees to be removed: None Land dedication: None D EV ELO 'N`dISN4G Cmi OF RENTONPMENTF 0 1999 ECENE r- "LVICOP�E CJN OF hE-NOAI JING 47 Plant II Parking Analysis Berl p® 0, /999 June 30, 1999 The City of Renton development standards for property located in the Industrial Heavy (IH) zone refer to parking requirements for the uses actually developed on the IH- zoned property. RNC 4-2-130.A. The following parking requirements apply to uses on the Boeing Renton property: Offices: 3.0 spaces per 1,000 s.f. gross floor area(minimum) 4.5 spaces per 1,000 s.f. gross floor area(maximum) Mfg./Labs: 1.0 spaces per 1,000 s.f. gross floor area(minimum) 1.5 spaces per 1,000 s.f. gross floor area(maximum) Storage: 1.0 spaces per 1,500 s.f. gross floor area RMC 4-4-080.F. The Boeing Renton facility currently contains a total of 7,671,465 s.f. of floor .area. This total is composed of the following general uses: Offices 1,860,000 s.f. Manufacturing/Laboratories 2,772,000 s.f. Storage/Warehouses 1,406,000 s.f. Support Uses 654,000 s.f. Non-Assignable 980,000 s.f. Total 7,672,000 s.f. If he Support Uses and Non-Assignable Uses are allocated pro-rata to the three types of uses for which the Renton Municipal Code defines parking requirements, the following are the current building floor areas in the primary uses: Offices 2,363,000 s.f. Manufacturing/Laboratories 3,522,000 s.f. Storage/Warehouses 1,787,000 s.f. Total 7,672,000 s.f. _ _ l A The total supply of parking spaces on the property 14,724. (The total number in the 1990 Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Boeing Renton Plant Expansion was 15,717.) If the Renton parking requirements for each of the major building uses are applied to the current building floor areas, the following are the minimum and maximum parking requirements for the property: Minimum Maximum Offices 7,089 10,633 Manufacturing/Laboratories 3,522 5,299 Storage/Warehouses 1,191 1,191 TOTAL 11,802 17,123 Our proposal is to demolish and sell a total of 657,421 s.f. of buildings in use as offices (buildings 10-60 and 10-65) and 173,560 s.f. of buildings in use as storage or warehouses (buildings 10-75, -76, -77,-79 and—111). In the area of the demolished 10- 60 and—65 we are proposing to construct a 2,715 space parking lot. The following will be the resulting total building floor areas in the primary uses: Square Feet Offices 1,705,579 Manufacturing/Laboratories 3,522,000 Storage/Warehouses 1,613,440 TOTAL 6,841,019 Applying The City of Renton parking requirements to these new building floor areas pro uces thee following minimum and maximum parking spaces: Minimum Maximum Offices 5,117 7,675 Manufacturing/Laboratories 3,522 5,299 Storage/Warehouses 1,076 1,076 TOTAL 9,715 14,050 The new parking space total: loss of 4,015, gain of 2,715 = net loss of 1,300. Thus, the substantial reduction in building floor area, especially in buildings with office uses, decreases the required parking spaces by more than the proposed net loss of parking spaces. The new parking space total is still comfortably above the minimum required number. allA • • EVELOPMENT'SERVICES DIVISION —"-"- WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL WAIVED MODIFIED c N REQUIREMENTSBY BY OMME TS. ..... Calculations, Sur' .... Drainage Control Plana • .,. Drainage Report 3 • Pvaio Su / IWO Ma/ 474ILZ Elevations, Grading 2 Existing Covenants(Recorded 4 Existing Easemehts (Recorded Copy) 4Flood Plain Map ........ if applicable 4 Floor Plans ......... ... Grading Plan, Conceptual 2 ......•:•:.:• ••••••••••':•••••'•••••:'•••••••: v Grading Plan, Detailed 2 1 King County.Assessor's Map Indicating Site 4 •Landscaping Plan, Conceptuak Legal Description 4 List of Surrounding Property 0wners4 ........................ . Mailing Labels for Property Owners 4 ..•••• Map:.CfEXISting.Site;:conditiChs 4 • . ... Master Application Form 4 ....... Monument Cards (one per monument) Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis 4 Plan Reductions (PMTs) 4 Postage 4 • • . (' Public WorkS-Apprcival Letter2 Title Report or Plat Certificate 4 Topography.Map•(51:contours)3 - ..• v Traffic Study 2 I I • Tree.CuttingNegetation Clearing Plan 4. Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 .• • .••• -• ............. .......... ....."••----"••••••••••••••••••••••••"...".., • • • . Wetlarids:petineetjCh..:M01p4 • ... . ••••• •:. •.••••••••-, .. • • •. . Wetlands Planting Plan 4 •; . ••• • • . • • Wetlands Study • . -.6(g• This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property SerVices Section. . PROJECT NAME: e7t5iPAN[61 fi1<6 LOT 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section DATE: 4. DevelopmentIl Planning Section • h:\division.s\develop.ser\dev.planingAwaiver.xls ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. ' Name of proposed project, if applicable: Parking lot 3 construction 2. Name of applicant The Boeing Company P.O. Box 3707, M/S 19-35 Seattle, WA 98124-2207 3. I Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Rick Ford Facilities Asset Management Organization The Boeing Company P.O. Box 3707, M/S 19-35 Seattle, WA 98124-2207 ® �LOp E. GITy � NrPLAN ., 4. Date checklist prepared: ®� TOE 'NG 1101,104 1999 October, 1999 RZCZ 5. Agency requesting checklist: I VED City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction Spring 2000 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Future additions or expansions of the project are not anticipated at this time. 8. 1 List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None needed. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Parking Lot 3 1 C:\USER\ARicks\Renton\parking lot checklist.doc 10/20/99 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Federal: None known at this time State of Washington: Dept. of Ecology: NPDES King County: None known at this time City of Renton/Local: State Environmental Policy Act Review/Approval Site Plan Approval Building permit 117 Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) The vacant property left after the demolition of the 10-60 and —65 buildings will be the location of a new parking lot. The site will have an approximate area of 22.45 acres this includes the adjacent lot 5, which will be also upgraded. This new proposed parking lot will be numbered lot 3 and will contain 1,892 20' x 9' stalls and 835 smaller compact stalls, totaling 2,727. Presently, the employees that will use this parking lot are using lot 6 located across Garden Avenue North to the east. Lot 6 will be vacated after the new lot is complete. There will not be any new or transferred-in employees using the parking lot, all will relocate from Lot 6. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Parking Lot 3 2 C:\USER\ARicks\Renton\parking lot checklist.doc 10/20/99 required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Site address: 800 Park Avenue N. Refer to exhibit A, Location in Region, Neighborhood Detail Map, and Site Plan for exact location. Exhibit B - Legal Description B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Flat b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)? 2% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Sandy silt loam d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The site will be graded and excavated as required for parking lot surface. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Yes. Precipitation and surface water runoff may cause erosion during grading and construction. At project completion, erosion impacts are not anticipated. The site will be fully built ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Parking Lot 3 3 C:\USER\ARicks\Renton\parking lot checklist.doc 1o/2o/99 out including landscaping. There will be no excavation left bare and thus no erosion impacts. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? The site is currently a 100% impervious, paved surface and, except for small landscape features, will continue to be impervious when the project is complete. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other • impacts to the earth, if any: Appropriate measures, such as silt fences and hay bale filters, will be used to control erosion during clearing and construction. After construction, exposed soils will be landscaped with vegetation. Specific erosion control measures will be detailed on the grading plans submitted for permit approval. See exhibit E "Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan" 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal(i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During construction, vehicle and construction equipment emissions and dust will be released. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Mitigation measures will be implemented as required to meet or exceed all applicable standards as required by the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency and the Department of Ecology. Additional potential mitigation measures to reduce emissions include ensuring that machines and equipment used during construction are well maintained II ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Parking Lot 3 4 C:\USER\ARicks\Renton\parking lot checklist.doc 10/20/99 • , 3. Water a. Surface: 1)Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The Cedar River is in the vicinity. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5)Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. • No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Parking Lot 3 5 C:\USER\ARicks\Renton\parking lot checklist.doc 10/20/99 1 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any(for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals. . . ;agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served(if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve. None c. Water runoff(including storm-water): 1)Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any(include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water runoff will be collected in the existing plant's storm- water control system. No additional impervious surface or runoff will be created by the project. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Utilize existing onsite storm water system to mitigate potential runoff water impacts. Appropriate mitigation measures will be initiated during construction to reduce and control surface water runoff impacts. See exhibit E "Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan" 4. 'PIants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs, grass, pasture, crop or grain, wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil other types of vegetation None ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Parking Lot 3 6 C:\USER\ARicks\Renton\parking lot checklist.doc 10/20/99 . b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: None 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed Ion or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds and animals that have been observed on or near the site are listed below: birds: seagulls, crows mammals: none observed fish: none observed b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Unknown d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Utilize temporary erosion, long-term storm water and hazardous materials control systems and best management practices to prevent contaminated discharges. 6. Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy(electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Parking Lot 3 7 C:\USERARicks\Renton\parking lot checklist.doc 10/20/99 • Parking lot lighting will use electricity. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None 7. ; Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Usual oils, greases, fuel and solvents will be present during demolition and construction. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. No special emergency services will be required. The hazardous materials involved are commonly used and are ' reasonably expected to be within the capability of existing emergency service operations. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: No b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project(for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Parking Lot 3 8 C:\USER\ARicks\Renton\parking lot checklist.doc 10/20/99 Temporary noise impacts during construction are anticipated. Construction projects of this type typically produce noise levels that range from 68 to 98 dba at 50 feet from the specific equipment. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None. The site is not near residential uses. 8. Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is fully developed as an aircraft manufacturing and assembly facility. . b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. The Renton Plant is a large airplane manufacturing and assembly facility, consisting of many buildings and ancillary uses. The project site is within the Renton Plant. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Heavy Industrial and Commercial f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Industrial Employment g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Parking Lot 3 9 C:\USER\ARicks\Renton\parking lot checklist.doc 10/20/99 h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive"area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: None 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? ! Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed? ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Parking Lot 3 10 C:\USER\ARicks\Renton\parking lot checklist.doc t0/20/99 The parking lot lighting standards ar approximately 30 feet high. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None 11! Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day.would it mainly occur? The parking lot will be lighted. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None anticipated. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None 12!Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The Cedar River shoreline trail and park are within the area. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Parking Lot 3 11 C:\USER\ARicks\Renton\parking lot checklist.doc 10/20/99 • • I c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 13! Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None have been identified on the project site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Although previous excavation have disclosed no indications of archaeological significance, if artifacts are uncovered, work in that area will be halted pending notification and response from appropriate agencies. 14.Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The parking lot will have access to North 8th Street, Park Avenue North and Garden Avenue. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes, at lot 6. We are in the process of discussing, with Metro, the possibility of relocating this stop to parking lot 3. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The completed parking lot will have 2,727 stalls. See exhibit C "Parking Analysis". ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Parking Lot 3 12 C:\USER,,\ARicks\Renton\parking lot checklist.doc 10/20/99 • d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project?If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. No additional trips will be generated. The vacation of lot 6 transfers or relocates the existing employee parking across Garden Avenue North to the proposed lot 3. See exhibit D `Traffic Study". g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services(for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. None is anticipated. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Electricity, natural gas, domestic water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer and storm sewerage are currently available. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Parking Lot 3 13 C:\USER\ARicks\Renton\parking lot checklist.doc 10/20/99 V 'b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. None C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decisidn. Signature: .1c141/ /7,1 Richard J. Ford Date Submitted: �� Z7 `q f ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Parking Lot 3 14 C:\USERARicks\Renton\parking lot checklist.doc 10/20/99 • r ISSUED BY TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY GUARANTEE Transnation GUARANTEE NUMBER Mlb - 0050 -14 SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE,THE LIMITS OF LIABILITY AND THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS OF THIS GUARANTEE, TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ®EVELOPMF NLANNING CIS OF RANT®N a corporation,herein called the Company No! 16 1999 GUARANTEES RECEIVED the Assured named in Schedule A against actual monetary loss or damage not exceeding the liability amount stated in Schedule A which the Assured shall sustain by reason of any incorrectness in the assurances set forth,,,id Schedule A. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused its corporate name and seal to be hereunto affixed by its duly authorized officers,the Guarantee to become valid when countersigned on Schedule A by an authorized officer or agent of the Company. TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY w arovE INS/0 ((�� / 2 \N44N LO�PORIIED 3$ Attest: R/ trery By:�j . .V. President 4uy► '4. CLTA Guarantee Pace Page(Rev 12-15-95) Gnrm 1n9c 1f1 nriin ILI AI TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 14450 N.E. 29TH PLACE BELLEVUE, WA 98007 THE BOEING COMPANY COUNTERSIGNED: P.O. BOX 3707 SEATTLE, WA 981242207 � �^ Attn: PAMELA NUGENT ', 1 42 .) 6 6 8589/1-800-441-7701 JOH►' W JONES, MARK S. NIKLASON CLA'JPI D. RELLIER or J. JAY c (FAX # (425) 646-8593) Limited Liability Guarantee SCHEDULE A Order No. 868998 Liability: $320 . 00 Premium: $320 . 00 Customer No. Tax: $ 27 . 52 Total : 347 . 52 1 . Name of Assured: BOEING COMPANY 2 . Date of Guarantee: OCTOBER 25, 1999 at 8 : 00 A.M. The assurances referred to on the face page hereof are : That, according to the public records relating to the following described land: See "LEGAL DESCRIPTION: " A. Title to the estate or interest in the land described above is vested in THE BOEING COMPANY, A DELAWARE CORPORATION pursuant to the following deed: Deed recorded under Recording No. 5324043 . B . The estate or interest in the land described above is : FEE SIMPLE C. There are no taxes or assessments, mortgages or deeds of trust, real estateicontracts, judgment liens, state or federal tax liens, or other monetary encumbrances which purport to affect title to the land, other than those shown below as exceptions . EXCEPTIONS : 1 . GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES and SERVICE CHARGES, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent, May 1; 2nd half delinquent, November 1) Tax Account No. Year Billed Paid Balance 082305-9011-08 1999 $324, 013 . 19 $162, 006 . 60 $162, 006 . 59 • EXCEPTIONS (continued) Order No. 868998 Total amount due, not including interest and penalty: $162, 006 . 59 Levy Code: 2100 Assessed Value Land: $13 , 957 . 700 . 00 Assessed Value Improvements : $10, 321, 200 . 00 (Covers property herein described and other property) 2 . EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: City of Renton PURPOSE: Waterline and anchors AREA AFFECTED: Strip of land 15 feet in width, as described therein RECORDING NO. : 8805190541 3 . EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: City of Renton PURPOSE : Public utilities AREA AFFECTED: A strip of land 20 . 00 feet in width as described therein RECORDING NO. : 8809230146 4 . EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: City of Renton PURPOSE: Public utilities AREA AFFECTED: Southerly portion, as described therein RECORD'IING NO. : 8811300191 5 . EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: City of Renton PURPOSE: Roadway and public utilities AREA AFFECTED: Northerly portion, as described therein RECORDING NO. : 8811150486 6 . EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: Puget Sound Power & Light Company, a Washington corporation • PURPOSE: Electric transmission/distribution substations and one or more electric transmission and/or distribution lines AREA AFFECTED: Portions as described therein RECORDING NO. : 9207130661 7 . EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: City of Renton PURPOSE: A motor control panel, architectural wall, and railing, together with all necessary appurtenances AREA AFFECTED: Portions, as described therein RECORDING NO. : 9607220167 Page 2 � A EXCEPTIONS (continued) Order No. 868998 8 . RELINQUISHMENT OF ALL EASEMENTS existing, future or potential, for access, light, view and air, and all rights of ingress, egress and regress to, from and between the land and the highway or highways to be constructed on land conveyed by deed. To: State of Washington Dated: September 14, 1956 Recorded: October 18, 1956 Recording No. : 4740681 9 . RELINQUISHMENT OF ALL EASEMENTS existing, future or potential, for access, light, view and air, and all rights of ingress, egress and regress to, from and between the land and the highway or highways to be constructed on land conveyed by deed. To: , State of Washington Dated:; July 15, 1966 Recorded: September 6, 1966 Recording No. : 6078423 Said instrument is a re-record of instrument recorded under Recording No. 6065436 . 10 . RELINQUISHMENT OF ALL EASEMENTS existing, future or potential, for access, light, view and air, and all rights of ingress, egress and regress to, from and between the land and the highway or highways to be constructed on land conveyed by deed. To: State of Washington Dated: August 30, 1966 Recorded: September 22, 1966 Recording No. : 6085985 Said instrument contains Right of Reversion in favor of Pacific Coast R.R. , a Washington corporation. 11 . RELINQUISHMENT OF ALL EXISTING, FUTURE OR POTENTIAL EASEMENTS for access,, light, view and air, and all rights of ingress, egress and regress to, from and between the land and the highway or highways constructed on lands condemned by proceedings under King County Superior Court . By: I State of Washington , Cause No. : 656127 12 . AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: May 23 , 1991 RECORDING NO. : 9105231158 REGARDING: _ License for fire main inter-tie at North 8th Street and Park Avenue 13 . Unrecorded leaseholds, if any; rights of vendors and holders of security interests on personal property installed upon the land; and rights, of tenants to remove trade fixtures at the expiration of the term. The following, matters are also excluded from the coverage of this guarantee : Page 3 1 EXCEPTIONSII (continued) Order No. 868998 1 . (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in Patens or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including, but not limited to, easements or equitable servitudes; or, (d) water' rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a) , (b) , (c) or (d) are shownIin the Company's property records . 2 . Right lof use, control or regulation by the United States of America in the exercise of powers over navigation; any prohibition or limitation on the use, occupance or improvement of the land resulting from the rights of the public or riparian owners to use any waters which may cover the land or to use any portion of the land which is now or may formerly have been covered by water. No guaranteelis made nor is liability assumed regarding (a) matters affecting the beneficial interest of any mortgage or deed of trust or other matter shown as an exception, (b) other matters which may affect any such mortgage, deed of trust) or other matter shown as an exception, (c) the identity of any party named oir referred to in an exception, or (d) with respect to the validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown therein. CC/amI ENCLOSURES : Sketch Vesting deed All recorded encumbrances I . Page 4 1 Order No. 868998 LEGAL 1ESCRIPTION: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M. , DESCRIBED. AS FOLLOWS : BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST 1/4 WITH THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF PARK STREET, ALSO KNOWN AS SECONDARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 2A; THENCE SOUTH 89°28 ' 19" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE 771 .21 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°31 '51" EAST 253 .23 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT OF RADIUS 850 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 274 . 82 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 17°59 '39" WEST 1484 . 81 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, SAID POINT BEING ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT FROM WHENCE THE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 49°18 ' 19" EAST 288 . 67 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 250 . 57 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY, SAID POINT OF TANGENCY BEING ON THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID PARK STREET; THENCE� SOUTH 00°57 '41" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 1581 . 30 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION FOR PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1 (SR 405) NORTH RENTON INTERCHANGE AS CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 656127; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION(S) THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTONIFOR PARK AVENUE NORTH BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 9703181422, BEING A RE-RECORDING OF 9612120855 AND RECORDING NO. 8811150482 ; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD; ADJOINING, WHICH, UPON VACATION, ATTACHED TO SAID PROPERTY BY OPERATION OF LAW; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. Page 5 r . 1_. • . \ •,,,,,V ,ts't cr.."°' jyr,' '/9.., .. ... v . ,./s•'. ''''t ,..,....,....: sr 1 X 4i> 1' A �, / �� 1 / ,Iti l.... ..„, ^} is A r I• \ '-.. T.','I,- +- `1, 0 I. r 0 a 4Ile 1 1. .• calala.isi iO. ` 0rC f F— I3Z3.il •a _C l�I a 1 I i/ I • 1,1 \ _ 4 • • ?, a,v p I, .p, O r.1,.i:vre1 a , 121. o r �1 P. _ Vit 1 1 i31 9 a I I- 2 i I • W Z. • a 7 IddC CI. ti 0 .f I A I (i r.rr�i�V s •,1a<N 1f•7!•!1M .uu....r I�a1 This sketch is provided, without charge, for your information. matters related to the propertyf on. It is not intended to show all including, but not limited to, area, dimensions, easements, en- croachments, or location of boundaries. It is not a part of, nor does it modify, the commitment or policy to which it is attached. The Company assumes NO LIABILITY for any matter related to this sketch. References should be made to an accurate survey for further information. I I SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE OF THIS GUARANTEE obtaining witnesses,prosecuting,,......ending the action or lawful act which in the opinion , of the Company may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or interest as 1. Except to the extent that specific assurances are provided in Schedule A of this stated herein,or to establish the lien tights of the Assured. If the Company is prejudiced by Guarantee,the Company assumes no liability for loss or damage by reason of the the failure of the Assured to furnish the required cooperation,the Company's obligations to following: the Assured under the Guarantee shall terminate. (a) Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims or other matters against the title,whether or not shown by the public records. 5. Proof of Loss or Damage. (b) (1) Taxes or assessments of any taxing authority that levies taxes or In addition to and after the notices required under Section 2 of these Conditions assessments on real property;or,I(2) Proceedings by a public agency which may result in and Stipulations have been provided to the Company,a proof of loss or damage signed and taxes or assessments,or notices of such proceedings,whether or not the matters excluded sworn to by the Assured shall be furnished to the Company within ninety(90)days after the under(1)or(2)are shown by the records of the taxing authority or by the public records. Assured shall ascertain the facts giving rise to the loss or damage. The proof of loss or (c) (I) Unpatented mining claims;(2)reservations or exceptions in patents or darfage shall describe the matters covered by this Guarantee which constitute the basis of loss in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof;(3)water rights,claims or title to water,whether or or damage and shall state,to the extent possible,the basis of calculating the amount of the not the matters excluded under(1),(2)or(3)are shown by the public records, loss or damage. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Assured to provide the required proof of loss or damage,the Company's obligation to such assured under the 2. Notwithstanding any specific assurances which are provided in Schedule A of this Guarantee shall terminate. In addition,the Assured may reasonably be required to submit to Guarantee,the Company assumes no liability for loss or damage by reason of the examination under oath by any authorized representative of the Company and shall produce following: for examination,inspection and copying,at such reasonable times and places as may be (a) Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims or other matters affecting the designated by any authorized representative of the Company,all records,books,ledgers, title to any property beyond the lines of the land expressly described in the description set checks,correspondence and memoranda,whether bearing a date before or after Date of forth in Schedule(A),(C)or in Part 2 of this Guarantee,or title to streets,roads,avenues, Guarantee,which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. Further,if requested by any lanes,ways or waterways to which such land abuts,or the right to maintain therein vaults, authorized representative of the Company,the Assured shall grant its permission,in writing, tunnels,ramps or any structure or improvements;or any rights or easements therein,unless for any authorized representative of the Company to examine,inspect and copy all records, such property,rights or easements are expressly and specifically set forth in said description. books,ledgers,checks,correspondence and memoranda in the custody or control of a third (b) Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims or other matters,whether or party, which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. All information designated as not shown by the public records; (1)which are created,suffered,assumed or agreed to by confidential by the Assured provided to the Company pursuant to this Section shall not be one or more of the Assureds;(2)which result in no loss to the Assured;or(3)which do not disclosed to others unless,in the reasonable judgment of the Company,it is necessary in the result in the invalidity or potential invalidity of any judicial or non-judicial proceeding which administration of the claim. Failure of the Assured to submit for examination under oath, is within the scope and purpose of the assurances provided, produce other reasonably requested information or grant permission to secure reasonably (c)The identity of any party shown or referred to in Schedule A. necessary information from third parties as required in the above paragraph,unless prohibited (d) The validity,legal effect or priority of any matter shown or referred to in by law or governmental regulation,shall terminate any liability of the Company under this this Guarantee. Guarantee to the Assured for that claim. GUARANTEE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 6. Options to Pay or Otherwise Settle Claims: Termination of Liability. 1. Definition of Terms. In case of a claim under this Guarantee,the Company shall have the following additional The following terms when used in the Guarantee mean: options: (a)the"Assured": the party or parties named as the Assured in this Guarantee, (a)To Pay or Tender Payment of the Amount of Liability or to Purchase the or on a supplemental writing executed by the Company. Indebtedness. (b)"land": the land described or referred to in Schedule(AXC)or in Part 2,and The Company shall have the option to pay or settle or compromise for or in the name of the improvements affixed thereto which by law constitute real property. The term"land"does Assured any claim which could result in loss to the Assured within the coverage of this not include any property beyond the lines of the area described or referred to in Schedule Guarantee,or to pay the full amount of this Guarantee or,if this Guarantee is issued for the (AXC)or in Part 2,nor any right;title,interest,estate or easement in abutting streets,roads, benefit of a holder of a mortgage or a lienholder,the Company shall have the option to avenues,alleys,lanes,ways or waterways. purchase the indebtedness secured by said mortgage or said lien for the amount owing (c)"mortgage":mortgage,deed of trust,trust deed,or other security instrument, thereon,together with any costs,reasonable attorneys'fees and expenses incurred by the (d) "public records": records established under state statutes at Date of Assured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of purchase. Guarantee for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property Such purchase,payment or tender of payment of the full amount of the Guarantee shall to purchasers for value and without knowledge. terminate all liability of the Company hereunder. In the event after notice of claim has been (e)"date": the effective date. given to the Company by the Assured the Company offers to purchase said indebtedness,the owner of such indebtedness shall transfer and assign said indebtedness,together with any 2. Notice of Claim to be Given by Assured Claimant. collateral security,to the Company upon payment of the purchase price. An Assured shall notify the Company promptly in writing in case knowledge shall come to Upon the exercise by the Company of the option provided for in Paragraph(a)the Company's an Assured hereunder of any claim of title or interest which is adverse to the title to the estate obligation to the Assured under this Guarantee for the claimed loss or damage,other than to or interest,as stated herein,and which might cause loss or damage for which the Company make ihe payment required in that paragraph,shall terminate,including any obligation to may be liable by virtue of this Guarantee. If prompt notice shall not be given to the continue the defense or prosecution of any litigation for which the Company has exercised Company,then all liability of the Company shall terminate with regard to the matter or its options under Paragraph 4,and the Guarantee shall be surrendered to the Company for matters for which prompt notice is required;provided,however,that failure to notify the cancellation. Company shall in no case prejudice the rights of any Assured under this Guarantee unless the (b)To Pay or Otherwise Settle With Parties Other Than the Assured or With the Company shall be prejudiced by the failure and then only to the extent of the prejudice. Assured Claimant. To pay or otherwise settle with other parties for or in the name of an Assured claimant any 3. No Duty to Defend or Prosecute, claim assured against under this Guarantee,together with any costs,attorneys'fees and The Company shall have no duty to defend or prosecute any action or proceeding to which expenses incurred by the Assured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the the Assured is a party, notwithstanding the nature of any allegation in such action or time of payment and which the Company is obligated to pay. proceeding. Upon the exercise by the Company of the option provided for in Paragraph(b)the Company's obligation to the Assured under this Guarantee for the claimed loss or damage,other than to 4. Company's Option to Defend or Prosecute Actions;Duty of Assured Claimant to make the payment required in that paragraph,shall terminate,including any obligation to Cooperate. continue the defense or prosecution of any litigation for which the Company has exercised Even though the Company has no duty to defend or prosecute as set forth in Paragraph 3 its options under Paragraph 4. above: (a)The Company shall have the right,at-its sole option and cost,to institute and 7. Determination and Extent of Liability. prosecute any action or proceeding,interpose a defense,as limited in(b),or to do any other This Guarantee is a contract of Indemnity against actual monetary loss or damage sustained act which in its opinion may beinecessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or or incurred by the Assured claimant who has suffered loss or damage by reason of reliance interest as stated herein,or to establish the lien rights of the Assured,or to prevent or reduce upon the assurances set forth in this Guarantee and only to the extent herein described,and loss or damage to the Assured. The Company may take any appropriate action under the subject to the Exclusions From Coverage of This Guarantee. terms of this Guarantee,whether or not it shall be liable hereunder,and shall not thereby Tbe liability of the Company under this Guarantee to the Assured shall not exceed the least concede liability or waive any provision of this Guarantee. If the Company shall exercise its of: rights under this paragraph,it shall do so diligently. (a)the amount of liability stated in Schedule A or in Part 2; (b)If the Company;elects to exercise its options as stated in Paragraph 4(a)the (b)the amount of the unpaid principal indebtedness secured by the mortgage of Company shall have the right to select counsel of its choice(subject to the right of such an Assured mortgagee,as limited or provided under Section 6 of these Conditions and Assured to object for reasonable cause)to represent the Assured and shall not be liable for Stipulations or as reduced under Section 9 of these Conditions and Stipulations,at the time and will not pay the fees of any other counsel,nor will the Company pay any fees,costs or the loss or damage assured against by this Guarantee occurs,together with interest thereon; expenses incurred by an Assured in the defense of those causes of action which allege matters or not covered by this Guarantee. ' (c)the difference between the value of the estate or interest covered hereby as (c)Whenever the Company shall have brought an action or interposed a defense stated herein and the value of the estate or interest subject to any defect,lien or encumbrance as permitted by the provisions of this Guarantee,the Company may pursue any litigation to assured against by this Guarantee. final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction and expressly reserves the right,in its sole discretion,to appeal from an adverse judgment or order. 8. Limitation of Liability. (d)In all cases where this Guarantee permits the Company to prosecute or (a)If the Company establishes the title,or removes the alleged defect,lien or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding,an Assured shall secure to the Company encumbrance,or cures any other matter assured against by this Guarantee in a reasonably the right to so prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding,and all diligent manner by any method,including litigation and the completion of any appeals appeals therein,and permit the Company to use,at its option,the name of such Assured for therefrom,it shall have fully performed its obligations with respect to that matter and shall this purpose. Whenever requested by the Company,an Assured,at the Company's expense, not be liable for any loss or damage caused thereby. shall give the Company all reasonable aid in any action or proceeding,securing evidence, CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS CONTINUED ON BACK COVER CLTA Guarantee Conditions and Stipulations Form 2015-7 (Rev.12-15-95) flPlfrlMAI . a CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS CONTINUED (b)In the event of any litigation by the Company or with the Company's consent, 12. Arbitration. • the Company shall have no liability for loss or damage until there has been a final detmnination by a court of competent jurisdiction,and disposition of all appeals therefrom, Unless prohibited by applicable law,either the Company or the Assured may demand adverse to the title,as stated herein. arbitration pursuant to the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration (c)The Company shall not be liable for loss or damage to any Assured for Association. Arbitrable matters may include,but are not limited to,any controversy or claim liability voluntarily assumed by the Assured in settling any claim or suit without the prior between the Company and the Assured arising out of or relating to this Guarantee,any service written consent of the Company. of the Company in connection with its issuance or the breach of a Guarantee provision or other obligation. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Liability is$1,000,000 or less 9. Reduction of Liability or Termination of Liability. shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Assured. All arbitrable matters All payments under this Guarantee,except payments made for costs,attorneys' when the amount of liability is in excess of$1,000,000 shall be arbitrated only when agreed fees and expenses pursuant to Paragraph 4 shall reduce the amount of liability pro tanto. to by both the Company and the Assured. The Rules in effect at Date of Guarantee shall be binding upon the parties. The award may include attorneys'fees only if the laws of the state 10. Payment of Loss. in which the land is located permits a court to award attorneys'fees to a prevailing party. (a)No payment shall be made without producing this Guarantee for endorsement Judgment upon the award rendered by the Arbitrator(s)maybe entered in any court having of the payment unless the Guarantee has been lost or destroyed,in which case proof of loss jurisdiction thereof. or destruction shall be furnished to the satisfaction of the Company. 1 (b)When liability and the extent of loss or damage has been definitely fixed in The law of the sims of the land shall apply to an arbitration under the Title Insurance accordance with these Conditions and Stipulations,the loss or damage shall be payable within Arbitration Rules. thirty(30)days thereafter. A copy of the Rules may be obtained from the Company upon request. 11. Subrogation Upon Payment or Settlement. Whenever the Company shall have settled and paid a claim under this Guarantee,all right of 13.Liability Limited to This Guarantee;Guarantee Entire Contract. subrogation shall vest in the Company unaffected by any act of the Assured claimant. (a)This Guarantee together with all endorsements,if any,attached hereto by the The Company shall be subrogated to and be entitled to all rights and remedies which the Company is the entire Guarantee and contract between the Assured and the Company. In Assured would have had against any person or property in respect to the claim had this interpreting any provision of this Guarantee,this Guarantee shall be construed as a whole. Guarantee not been issued. If requested by the Company,the Assured shall transfer to the Company all rights and remedies against any person or property necessary in order to perfect (b)Any claim of loss or damage,whether or not based on negligence,or any this right of subrogation.The Assured shall permit the Company to sue,compromise or settle action asserting such claim,shall be restricted to this Guarantee. in the name of the Assured and to use the name of the Assured in any transaction or litigation involving these rights or remedies. (c)No amendment of or endorsement to this Guarantee can be made except by a writing endorsed hereon or attached hereto signed by either the President,a Vice President, If a payment on account of a claim does not fully cover the loss of the Assured the Company the Secretary,an Assistant Secretary,or validating officer or authorized signatory of the shall be subrogated to all rights and remedies of the Assured after the Assured shall have Company. recovered its principal,interest,and costs of collection. 14. Notices,Where Sent. All notices required to be given the Company and any statement in writing required to be furnished the Company shall include the number of this policy and shall be addressed to: Consumer Affairs Department,P.O.Box 27567,Richmond,Virginia 23261-7567. • xi W N 3- O C o B m ZZ� .:4m O Q cn a. O 41 > t o .4 m 0 —II z ,—9'3 1 Al N io z I= - = trl Uo `" n > O� t7 aJ CI O z DEVELOPMENT PLAN •JIN0 CITY OF REiNTOeN Pe !o o 1999 it—LJ STORMWATER POLLUTION TION, LUTION PLAN PROJECT August 5, 1999 II TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Scope of Work 1.1.1 Demolition of Existing Buildings and Utilities 1.1.2 Parking Lot Construction and Utilities 1.2 Description of the Storm Drain System in the Project Area 1.2.1 Existing System 1.2.2 Planned System 1.3 Objectives of the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan 1.4 Roles and Responsibilities 2.0 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 2.1 Background • 2.2 Applicable Erosion and Sediment Control BMPs 2.3 Inspection and Maintenance 2.L Site Stabilization 2.5 Site Maps and Vicinity Maps 3.0 POTENTIAL POLLUTANTS OTHER THAN SEDIMENT 3. Background 3.2 Applicable BMPs for Pollutants other than Sediment 3.3 Spill Control and Reporting During Construction Activities 3.3.1 Small Leaks\Spills 3.3.2 Large Leaks\Spills 3.3.3 Posting 3.4 Non-Stormwater Discharges I� , 4.0 APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT City of Renton Stormwater Ordinance -No. 1755 5.0 RECORDKEEPING APPENDICES Appendix IA: Erosion Control BMPs Applicable To This Project Appendix!B: BMPs For Pollutants Other Than Sediment Appendix C: Maps SECTION 1 II 1.0 INTRODUCTION This Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is being submitted to the Washington State Department of Ecology(Ecology) to issue a permit for Boeing to discharge stormwater associated with construction activity at the Renton site. The permit is required because the construction work will require erosion control measures in an area over five acres. 1.1 Scope of Work The Boeing Company is seeking coverage under the Washington department of Ecology's NPDES General Permits for stormwater discharges associated with construction activities. The proposed project is for the protection of an existing stormwater systems during construction activities related to the demolition of two buildings with a small portion of one being retaining. Following the building demolition a 2,715 stall asphalt paving parking lot will be constructed. The project is located in the City of Renton on the Boeing property bounded by N. 8th St,Park Ave N., and Garden Ave.N. Project site is 22.46 Acres. During construction storm water will receive treatment through the use of silt fencing, catch basin filter inserts, straw bales, and other standards of practice methods.Following the completion of the parking lot construction storm water will receive treatment through oil water separators per the City of Reriton standards. Upon treatment the storm water will discharge to the City of Renton storm water system which eventually discharges into Lake Washington. Work on the project will began in September 1998 with demolition of the 10-60 and 10-65 buildings.' The grading, paving, and landscaping of the new 22 acre parking lot will be begin in January 2000 and end by May of 2000. Specific acI tivities for this phase of work include: • demolition and disposition of some subsurface structures (including slabs, trenches, I sumps and foundations) • excavation, removal and disposal of abandoned utilities in the exiting building I footprint • I re-grading soil at the site for parking areas, roadways, landscaping and walkways • I paving parking areas, roads, and walkways • I installing landscaping and irrigation 1.1.1 Demolition of Existing Buildings and Utilities Demolitioin of buildings and utilities will involve: removal of floor slabs, foundations, trenches, sumps, and other subsurface features. In addition, demolition will include the excavation of existing utilities (storm, sanitary, electrical, water, mechanical, etc.) that are no longer needed or that will be replaced. Demolition work will expose soil to the extent of building footprints and approximately four feet wide in areas where utilities will be removed. Also, soil stockpiles will be created as part of this work. Portions of soil exposed and excavated may be contaminated with heavy metals, volatile organics, PCBs, and petroleum hydrocarbons. Demolition will occur at the locations presented below. Also, the approximate size and schedule of work for each area is shown. Demolition Location Approximate Area Anticipated (square footprint) Schedule Building 10-60 88,000 9/99 to 11/99 Building 10-65 287,000 9/99 to 12/99 1.1.2 Parking Lot Construction & Utilities This workliwill include the excavation for utilities, and preparation of soils for floor slabs and pavement . Soil stockpiles will be created during this work. As above, some of the soil exposed and excavated may be contaminated. Also, potential pollutants other than soil may be present during this work. Construction Location Approximate Area Anticipated (square footprint) Schedule Parking Lot 22 acres 1/00 to 5/00 1.2 Description of the Storm Drain System in the Project Area 1.2.1 Existing System The existing site is entirely impervious and will remain so as a result of the project. The site is divided into 4 sub-basin areas each draining independently into the City of Renton's public stormwater sewer system. Eventually the City of Renton's stormwater sewer system outfalls into Lake Washington 1.2.2 Planned System As a resulti of the Project, the number of catch basins will be added to allow for the new parking lot configuration. The existing outfall lines into the City of Renton stormwater sewer system will be reused as the points of discharge. Stormwater quality treatment BMPs will be added to each outfall as required be the City of Renton adoption of the King County 1990 Surface Water Design Manual. 1.3 Objectives of the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan • This stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) is for construction of the project. Objectives of this plan are: • to prevent discharge of non-permitted process water, domestic wastewater, and non- contact cooling water to the stormwater drainage system, • to implement best management practices (BMP) for the reduction, elimination, or prevention of stormwater pollution and to implement BMPs that are adequate to prevent discharge of toxics floating material, and erosion and settleable solids and turbidity, • to prevent violations of surface water quality, groundwater quality, and sediment management standards, and • to prevent adverse water quality impacts including impacts on beneficial uses during peak runoffs. This SWPPP consists of: Section 2 ' Erosion and Sediment Control Plan Section 3 Procedures for the Control of Potential Pollutants other than Sediment Section 4 Applicable Requirements of Local Government Section 5 Required Recordkeeping Appendix A Copy of applicable erosion control BMPs Appendix B Copy of applicable BMPs for pollutants other than sediments Appendix C Maps 1.4 Roles and Responsibilities The 24-ho;ur contact person who has authority over the SWPPP implementation for the project is Place Name, pager: (xxx)xxx-xxxx. Place Name is an alternate, pager: (xxx)xxx-xxxx. Boeing plans to implement all available methods to prevent discharge of settleable solids and to reduce turbidity, as outlined in this SWPPP. The SWPPP will be modified whenever self- inspections reveal BMP inadequacies and when there is a change in design, construction, operation or maintenance of any BMP which causes the SWPPP implementation to be less effective in controlling potential pollutants. The SWPPP will be retained on-site, and will be made available to the Department of Ecology or the City of Renton upon request. A copy of the SWPPP, and other recordkeeping documents concerning this permit, will be kept at Renton for a period of at least five years after final stabilization. 1 Although the permit allows the discharge of water from construction dewatering to surface water, Boeing has chosen not to allow this activity to occur. Boeing will allow the re-infiltration of groundwater back into the ground as long as MTCA Method B Groundwater Cleanup Levels are achieved, there are no listed wastes, or Ecology has granted a contained-in-determination for the waste that has a listed component. Contractor will be responsible for collecting and disposing of screenings, grit, solids, sludges, filter backwash, or other pollutants removed from the filter fabric in the drainage structures, and to ensure these items will not be re-introduced into the storm drain system. Any discharges to the storm drain system or sanitary sewer will not occur without prior approval from Boeing Environmental Affairs, phone (206) 655-4930. Approval from King County must be securedi prior to discharge to the sanitary sewer. Contractor will notify Boeing Environmental Affairs at (206) 655-4930 of any non-compliance. Also, after the site has undergone final stabilization, Contractor will notify Boeing so that a Notice of Termination can be submitted. II II III SECTION 2 2.0 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN The most important part of the SWPPP is the erosion and sediment control plan. This plan provides background information and describes applicable erosion and sediment control BMPs, and planned implementation of these BMPs. 2.1 Background The site is'adjacent to the Duwamish Waterway to the West, Jorgensen Steel to the South,East Marginal Way South to the east and Slip 4 to the north. The project area is 100 percent impermeable, mostly flat, drains to the Duwamish Waterway, and there is no vegetation. Soils in the project area are sandy and free-draining. The following construction processes will expose soil that may require appropriate erosion and sediment control measures: • removal of buildings elements (foundations, slabs, trenches, sumps, etc.) • removal of utilities and pavements • remediation activities • preparation of soils for utilities and pavement • stockpiling • vehicle and equipment movement throughout the project site A critical erosion control practice at the site will be to protect catch basins from solids accumulation due to vehicle and equipment movement. No critical drainage has been identified in the project area and erosion due to overland flow is not an issue. This project is not anticipated to increase peak rates of runoff or affect off-site properties. The plan to control erosion during construction includes BMPs that implement temporary and permanent stabilization practices, and inspection and maintenance. The appropriate BMPs will be installed, adjusted and maintained in compliance with this SWPPP and local government requirements. All storm drain inlets made operable during construction will be properly maintained. Sediment "drag-out" onto paved roads will be kept to a minimum. Adjacent road surfaces will be cleaned on a regular basis. Demolition and grading will be performed immediately prior to commencing the construction of permanent improvements or as needed to prevent the exposure of soils for an unnecessary length of time. The site construction sequence will proceed so that erosion control measures will be in place prior to soil exposure. The sequence of construction activities for the work is presented below: • Demolish foundations, etc., to grade 9/99 - 11/99 • Install site filter fencing 11/99 • Complete stabilized entrances 11/99 • Install filter fabric in catch basins 11/99 • Demolish underground utilities 9/99 - 3/00 • Complete new utilities 3/00 • ! Complete parking lots 5/00 Erosion and sediment control BMPs applicable to this project and a description of how they will be implemented, are presented in Section 2.2 below. A copy of these BMPs has been included in Appendix A. Boeing will implement a schedule of regular inspections and repair of these BMPs, as discussed in Section 2.3. 2.2 Applicable Erosion and Sediment Control BMPs Based on a review of the Ecology Stormwater Management Manual, the following erosion and sediment control BMPs are applicable to this project: • E1.20 - Clear Plastic Coverings • E2.10 - Stabilized Construction Entrance, Construction Traffic and Tire Wash • E2.20 - Dust Control • E3.10—Filter Fence • E3.30- Storm Drain Inlet Protection E 1.20 - Clear Plastic Coverings To prevent erosion, between October 1 and April 30, soils stockpiled on pavement will be stabilized (covered with 6-mil plastic sheeting) within two days. Between May 1 and September 30, stockpiles will be covered within seven days. Soils stockpiled on exposed soil will be covered when they contain chemical contaminants or they create a dust problem. Covered stockpiles will be inspected on a daily basis and maintained as needed. Inspections will be documented on a log sheet, which will be placed in Section 5.0 of this plan. A blank inspection form for this purpose is located in this section. E2.10 - Stabilized Construction Entrance, Construction Traffic and Tire Wash Construction entrances will be stabilized in accordance with the BMP with clean, recycled concrete (or equivalent material) to reduce the transport of sediment onto paved roads. If sediment is transported onto roads, these roads will be cleaned as needed by sweeping. Street washing will not be performed unless other methods to prevent the transport of sediments are unsuccessful. Whenever construction vehicle access routes intersect paved roads, including those inside Boeing, provisions will be made to reduce sediment transport. The construction site will be cleaned on a regular basis. Street washing will not be allowed unless other methods to prevent the transport or the removal the sediments are unsuccessful. Existing roads will be used for construction traffic wherever possible. A recycled concrete (or equivalent material) overlay will be provided for the transition between exposed soil areas and existing paved surfaces. Entrances to the construction site will be protected from erosion using compacted, recycled concrete (or equivalent materials.) Construction entrance and exits, construction traffic areas and tire wash areas will be inspected on a daily basis and maintained as needed. Inspections will be documented on a log sheet, which will be placed in Section 5.0 of this plan. A blank copy of an inspection form for this purpose is provided in this section. E2.20 - Dust Control Paved areas will be swept on a regular basis to control dust. Only when sweeping is not effective will water be used to control dust. Water can be used to control dust on non-paved areas. Street sweeping and the sprinkling of water will be repeated as necessary for this control. Dust control methods will be evaluated on a daily basis and maintained as needed. Inspections will be documented on a log sheet, which will be placed in Section 5.0 of this plan. A blank copy of anl inspection form for this purpose is provided in this section. E3.30- Storm Drain Inlet Protection Storm drain inlets operable in the construction area will be maintained properly to control the discharge of solids to the Duwamish Waterway. Catch basins will be protected from sediment accumulation by using filter fabric. All storm drain inlets in the project area will be inspected, and maintained as necessary at least once a week, or when there is a 24-hour rain event greater than 0.5 inches. Clogged or damaged filters will be replaced. • . 3 Filtration systems in inactive construction locations will be inspected and maintained a minimum of once a week or within 24 hours of a storm event (exceeding 0.5 inches of rainfall). Sediment trapped in filters will be removed and properly disposed of when one foot or more accumulates or when the trap is filled more than 50 percent of capacity. Catch basin inspections will be documented on a log sheet, which will be placed in Section 5.0 of this plan. A blank copy of an inspection form for this purpose is provided in this section. 2.3 Inspection and Maintenance The following weekly stormwater-related inspections will be performed during the project to: • verify roadways are clear of sediment and debris • dolcument stabilization activities that have started or stopped • document construction activities that have started or stopped • verify truck entrance and exit stations are being maintained • verify the site is free of uncontrolled dust • veI ify petroleum products\chemicals stored in covered, wind-protected areas within a berm • verify lids have been placed on petroleum product\chemical storage containers • maintain a log of each catch basin in active construction areas to verify filter fabric is properly functioning and to document corrective actions • maintain a log of each soil stockpile to verify the date created, date removed, waste designation, when and whether piles have been covered and the volume of the soil stockpile. Inspection reports will include the scope of inspection, personnel conducting inspection, dates of inspection, major observations relating to implementation of the SWPPP, and actions taken as a result of the inspection. These inspection reports will be prepared and retained in Section 5 of this plan. The catch basin and soil stockpile logs will be maintained as separate documents. The remaining inspection items will be maintained on a single inspection form. Blank copies of each inspection form have been provided in Section 5. 2.4 Site Stabilization Temporary sediment control measures will be installed, inspected and maintained as discussed in Sections 2.2 and 2.3 above. Removal of these measures will be performed in a phased approach, with the last measures removed no later than 30 days after earthwork construction is complete or soil stockpiles are no longer present. Trapped sediment will be removed or permanently stabilized on-site, and the site will be swept. Final stabilization will occur when paving and landscaping are complete. , Dates when major grading activities occur, when construction activities temporary or permanently cease, and when stabilization measures are initiated must be recorded. This information will be documented on a log, which will be retained in Section 5. A blank copy of an inspection form for this purpose has been provided in this section. 2.5 Site and Vicinity Maps Site vicinity maps can be found in the Contractor project field office. These maps include the following information that is required and applicable to this site: • vicinity map • existing site contours • final site contours • north arrow • existing drainage patterns • contaminated soil boundaries • limits of grading • location of the erosion and sediment control and stormwater management BMPs used on site • construction entrance and exit detail (length, width, thickness and rock size) • locations of sediment traps and all associated pipes and structures • provide typical detail of filtering devices • location of equipment washdown areas SECTION 3 3.0 POTENTIAL POLLUTANTS OTHER THAN SEDIMENT This section provides: background information concerning potential pollutants other than sediment, describes applicable BMPs for the management of pollutants other than sediment, and describes planned efforts to control spills and leaks. 3.1 Background w' activities willinvolve pollutantsother that sediment. These activities must be The folio mg acts ihes appropriately managed to prevent the commingling of pollutants with stormwater. BMPs described below will be followed to assure that this occurs. • repair land servicing equipment • fueling equipment and vehicles • use of chemicals during building construction (resins, paints, epoxies, etc.) • accumulation of waste • storage of hazardous materials • building concrete slab removal Operation, maintenance, storage and disposal practices will be performed at the project to reduce the potential for stormwater contamination. This will be accomplished by following the BMPs described�in Section 3.1 below. A copy of the applicable BMPs for control of pollutants other than sediment at this project are located in Appendix B. 3.2 Applicable BMPs to Control Pollutants other than Sediments Based on the Ecology Stormwater Management Manual, below are the applicable BMPs for this project, and a discussion of how they will be implemented. • C 11.20 Handling of Petroleum Products • C11.40 Solid Waste Handling and Disposal • C11.50 Use of Chemicals During Construction • C 1.60 Managing Hazardous Products • C1.70 Vehicle and Equipment Washing • C1.90 Treatment and Disposal of Contaminated Soils • C2.00 Concrete Trucks/Spray Washing of Exposed Aggregate 1 • I C 1.20 Handling of Petroleum Products Good housekeeping practices will be maintained. Equipment and vehicles will be inspected and maintained on a regular basis to prevent accidental spills and/or leaks. Major equipment maintenance will be performed at a properly permitted location, off of the Renton site. Daily maintenance activities, such as oil changes, will occur on-site. Also, heavy equipment that cannot leave the project site without being hauled on a trailer or truck will be worked on at the project site, provided this work will be performed in a designated area and best management practices are used. This activity will ensure that equipment used at the site operate properly and do not contribute to stormwater contamination. Oil and lubricants, and waste containing these substances (i.e. oil cans, rags, paper, etc.) will be disposed in proper receptacles. Waste oil for recycling will not be mixed with degreasers, solvents, antifreeze or brake fluid. C1.40 Solid Waste Handling and Disposal No waste will be dumped in the sanitary sewer or storm drain system. All waste oil and contaminated debris will be accumulated on-site according to established Boeing guidelines. Boeing will manage the disposal of waste. Adequate accumulation areas will be provide on-site for the accumulation of solid waste. Waste containers will be labeled, located in covered and contained areas, and lids will be kept closed at all times. Ecology guidelines for storing petroleum products at construction sites will be followed. Whenever possible, useful materials will be salvaged and recycled. C 1.50 Use of Chemicals During Construction Good housekeeping will be implemented as a method of controlling chemical pollutants. Also, chemicals will be applied per the recommended directions, and amounts to further reduce pollution. 'Any left over chemicals will be properly disposed. Corrosive liquids will be kept away from flammable liquids. C 1.60 Managing Hazardous Products All materials used in construction and demolition, as well mobile and stationary equipment, will be considered potential waste generation sources. The majority of these wastes will be generated at the construction site. Potential waste such as solvents, paints,batteries, strong acid and alkaline wastes, and paint removers are all considered dangerous wastes and will be disposed in accordance with standards listed on the individual containers. Only products that are needed will be bought and used. Leftovers will be stored,re-used, recycled or properly disposed. Product will be kept in original containers and will be well labeled. Chemicals will not be mixed unless recommended by the manufacturer, and they will be used in well-ventilated areas. Proper personal protective equipment and clothing will be used. Containers will not be disposed until the entire product has been used, or removed from the container. C 1.70 Vehicle and Equipment Washing Thinners and solvents used to wash equipment will not be discharged into the sanitary sewer or storm drain system. Small parts will be cleaned with degreasing solvents. These solvents will not be discharged to the storm drain or sanitary sewer. Instead they will be recycled and re-used. C 1.90 Treatment and Disposal of Contaminated Soils Boeing guidelines for soil handling and disposal at the project, dated February 27, 1998, will be followed. A copy of these guidelines are on-site and available upon request. I1 C2.00 Concrete Trucks/Spray Washing of Exposed Aggregate Washout from concrete trucks and concrete cutting waste will be properly disposed. This waste will not be dumped into the sanitary sewer, storm drains, or onto pavement. As first alternative for this waste will be to discharge it onto exposed soils at the site. Care must be taken not to create a dump pit for this waste. 3.3 Spill Control and Reporting During Construction Activities The following procedures will be followed in case an incident such as a fire or spill occurs at the site. 3.3.1 Small Leaks/Small Spills Equipment At all times suitable quantities of absorbent materials and containment for small spills will be kept on-site. Response • Assess the situation and ensure safety of all personnel. • By; appropriate measures, limit the size and site of a small leak or spill (i.e., if a container is leaking, place it in an approved container and clean up the spill using the appropriate materials). • Call Boeing Security/Fire Protection at 655-2222; provide information as above. • Call Boeing Spill Coordinator, Yvette Barnett- (206) 930-6068 • Call Boeing Environmental Affairs Water Quality, Mark Wicklein - (206) 655-4930. • Contact the Owner's representative as soon as practicable and report: - location of spill - what substance spilled - estimate of total quantity spilled - why spill occurred - time of spill - what is being or was done to stop and clean up spill 3.3.2 Large Spills Response • Assess situation and ensure safety of all personnel. • Secure operations. • Stop spill at source, if it can be done safely. • Contain the spill with available absorbent materials, if it can be done safely. • Isolate spilled material and, if possible, prevent the spill from entering waters of the state. • Secure the spill site. • Call Boeing Security/Fire Protection at 655-2222; provide information as above. • I Call Boeing Spill Coordinator, Yvette Barnett - (206) 930-6068 • Call Boeing Environmental Affairs Water Quality, Mark Wicklein - (206) 655-4930. • Contact the Owner's representative as soon as practicable and report: - ' name - location of spill - what substance spilled - estimate of total quantity spilled - why spill occurred - time of spill - what is being done to stop and clean up spill 3.3.3 Posting Emergency response procedures, provisions of WAC 296-62-300, the above contact names and telephone numbers, and the location of emergency equipment will be posted at the following locations: - at site office - on project bulletin boards - at locations of chemical waste and chemical material use or accumulation • 3.4 Non-Stormwater Discharges Some nonf stormwater will be discharged to the storm drain system. These sources use relatively low volumes of city water and are not associated with industrial processes or otherwise exposed to pollutants before discharge. These sources include: fire-line flushing, domestic water-line flushing and irrigation water. Also, stormwater that has accumulated in various new storm drain and sanitary sewer structures in association with building and utilities construction. During the Demolition of the 10-60 and 10-65 water runoff caused by dust control during the existing building concrete slab removal shall not be discharge to storm sewer system. Runoff from this dust control procedure shall be diverted from the storm sewer system and discharged into sanitary sewer. This process will be insured by the installation of a 6"high containment berm around the 10-65 building as shown on the project T.E.S.C. drawings. The construction sequence of the SWPP to keep non-stormwater discharges from entering the storm sewer system is as follows: 1. Install containment berm around 10-65 building to direct demo wash water to sanitary sewer 2. Disconnect roof drains from STS system and redirect to concrete pavement surface. 3. Change selected sanitary sewer manhole solid covers with a slotted grate cover 4. Install plug in downstream sanitary sewer line to eliminate direct discharge into the Metro sewer system. Wash water entering the end sanitary manhole shall be pumped into a holding tank for testing and discharge as directed by Boeing Environmental Affairs. 5. Upon completion of removal of 10-65 concrete slab remove the containment berm and replace sanitary sewer solid covers. 6. Demo fire water system as directed by the site plan removal drawings 7. Remove concrete pavement 8. Install temporary erosion and sediment control BMP's in association with concrete pavement removal. 9. Stabilize exposed soil and stockpiles per SWPP plan section 2.4. I � . SECTION 4 4.0 APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT City of Renton ordinance requires that this project comply with the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) dated 1990. Section 2.0 and Section 3.0 above address compliance with applicable BMPs presented in the Ecology SWMM and the KCSWDM. SECTION 5 5.0 RECORDKEEPING This section is reserved for records associated with operation, maintenance, storage and disposal practices associated with BMPs implemented for this construction site. Records in, this section document stormwater-related inspections that have been performed during the project. Inspection requirements are discussed in Section 2.3. As discussed in that section, inspection reports will be prepared and retained in Section 5 of this plan. The catch basin and soil stockpile logs will be maintained as separate documents. The remaining inspection,,items will be maintained on a single inspection form. Blank copies of each inspection form have'been provided in Section 5. Other information, such as correspondence with regulatory agencies, also will be maintained in this section. APPENDIX A COPY OF APPLICABLE EROSION CONTROL BMPs Appendix A includes a copy of all the applicable erosion and sediment control BMPs for the project. II , APPENDIX B COPY OF APPLICABLE BMPs FOR POLLUTANTS OTHER THAN SEDIMENTS Appendix B includes a copy of all the applicable BMPs for pollutants other than sediments. APPENDIX C • MAPS Site vicinity maps can be found in the Contractor project field office. These maps include the following information required and applicable to this project: • vicinity map • existing site contours • final site contours • norith arrow • exiting drainage patterns • contaminated soil boundaries • limits of grading • location of the erosion and sediment control and stormwater management BMPs used on site • construction entrance and exit detail (length, width, thickness and rock size) • locations of sediment traps and all associated pipes and structures • provide typical detail of filtering devices • location of equipment washdown areas II OCT-_'��-199��+ 1;: CITY OF F.E�JTON 1�c 470 7 300 P.O1:C MEMORANDUM DATE: e - 2 -OS TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan, Review, Project Planner . FROM: Jana Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: ede.(:)" / - o /G-65" detsia 7 fc LOCATION: PLC' PAL .Avg PREAPP NO. '3 9 4,7 A meeting with the applicant has been scheduled for q , Thursday, / u'S- /2`r`'_ , in one of the 6�'floor conference rooms (new City Hall). If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11:00 AM meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. Please submit your written comments to Pier at least two (2) days before the meeting.. Thank you. CS DES N-coN 1NG f f LOPMENTE /t/ CIN AEG 2, 4 1999 i� <=li G ? DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON 1999 . '',ECEIVED Prcapp2 OCT-20-1999 17:29 C I T`I OF REHTOH 425 430 7300 P.02:05 rFNTON FARE P►AF PArVFNrInN 8 DA • P r AUG 03.1999 REc;E1 v _ D MEMORANDUM ' DATE: -05 TO: 1 Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan, Review, Project Planner FROM: 1 Jana Hanson, Development'Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: k 1ecr1 //'645 /G- 2 c demo AI LOCATION: 4 Park, Ave Af • PREAPP NO. qq -(97 • Amemeeting with the applicant has been scheduled for Al , Thursday, za74 /z - , in one of the 6th floor conference rooms (new City Hall). If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11:00 AM meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. Please submit your written comments to A-- at least two (2) days before the meeting. .Thank you. • /00 c4A (16141j7. 0/e,4` 6/3/f7 PP Prey 2 . . OCT-2L3-1999 1 7:29 CITY OF RENTON C-.)uuu • BOEING DEMOLITION 10-60& 10-65 BUILDINGS 800 PARK AVE. N. _ • August 12, 1999 1. Provide drawing showing water meter size and locations to be removed and service lines to be • cPPed- Z. Provide drawing to show where sewer line will be capped and abandoned. 3. Provide thy...clot Storm Drainage Report per 1990 King Count Surface Water Design Manual. . Address specifically Special Requirements 5 & 6 and any other Core or Special Requirements tliat may apply to the proposed parking lot. The following information will be needed: Existing Impervious surface area. `- New impervious surface area. 4 a proposed haul route. Provide map of p po 0 5_ Remove driveway on park Ave.N. 1st driveway north of N. 8th Street. 6. The second driveway on park Ave. N.,north of N. 8th Street will need to revert to right in and right out due to left turn conflicts with the future South Port Development. 7. A transportation study of the traffic distribution at the intersection adjacent to the site and access entrances to be provided. • 99cm073m • ' I 99CM073M.DOC1 OCT-2n-1999 17:29 T`i' OF RENTON 425 430 7300 P.04 05 • CITY OF RENTON Planning / Building/ Public Works • MEMORANDUM DATE: August 12, 1999 TO: , Pre-Application File FROM: Peter Rosen, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Boeing 10-60/10/65 Demo and Parking Expansion- Pre-App File No.99-67 We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the proposed Boeing 10-60/10/65 Demo and Parking Expansion. Listed below and attached on several sheets are our preliminary findings. Although every attempt Is made to ensure that these comments are complete, a more thorough examination of the project at the time of application submittal may reveal additional issues that may alter these comments or require additional comments. Proposal -;The proposal Is to first demolish the existing 10-60 and 10-65 buildings. After demolition is completed,the area would be paved and-landscaped for a parking lot. The project site has split zoning. It is zoned Heavy Industrial (IH) on the north where Building 10-65 Is located and',Commercial Office(CO)on the south where Building 10-60 is located. Permit Requirements, The applicant has Indicated a preference to break the demolition and parking .lot construction into two separate land use applications, in order to proceed with the demolition most expediently. The demolition would require SEPA environmental review. Site plan review is required for all development (subject to SEPA requirements)in the CO zone. However, the proposal would not require site plan review because the code definition of development does not include demolition of structures. Development in the IH zone is I exempt from site plan review requirements. The SEPA review process would require approximately 6 to 8 weeks,which includes the appeal period. The construction of the parking lot, subsequent to demolition of the buildings, would require SEPA environmental review and Hearing Examiner site plan review. As discussed previously, site plan review is required for all development in the CO zone. The parking lot area in the CO zone includes 963 parking stalls. Projects with over 300 parking stalls require Hearing Examiner site plan review. As discussed in the project narrative,a landscape variance would be required to reduce the required width of perimeter landscaping along street frontages. The Hearing Examiner would review the landscape variance concurrent with the site plan review. The Hearing Examiner review process for the site plan and variance applications would take approximately 10 to 12 weeks. Zoning. As discussed previously, the project site has split zoning with Heavy Industrial (IH)zoning on the north and Commercial Office(CO)on the south. Most development standards of the IH and CO zones apply to construction of buildings and are not applicable to demolition of structures or to construction of parking lots. The development standards discussed below are pertinent to the proposal. Landscaoina: The Heavy Industrial (IH) zone requires a minimum landscape width of 20 feet along arterial streets and 15 feet along non-arterial streets. Park Avenul is considered a principal arterial and therefore would require a minimurq 20-foot wide landscape strip. A 15-foot wide landscape strip would be required along other street frontages in the IH zone. In addition, the IH zone requires that all portions of a site not covered by buildings, circulation, or required parking be maintained as permeable areas improved with native, drought-resistant landscaping. 9oe1ng 10-60110165 Demo and Parking Expansion.DOC OCT-20-1999 1;:29 CIT`I OF RENTON 425 430 7300 P.05.-05 The Commercial Office (CO) requires a minimum 10-foot landscape along streets. A minimum 15-foot wide sight-obscuring landscape strip is required where a CO zoned lot is adjacent to property zoned commercial or office. To the south of the subject site, across N 8 Street, the property is zoned CO. Therefore a minimum 15-foot wide sight-obscuring landscape strip would be required along the frontage of N.8'�Street. The project narrative indicates plans are for a 10-foot wide perimeter landscape strip around the site. The applicant would require approval of a variance from landscape requirements of the IH zone and the CO zone to reduce the required width of landscaping. Parking regulations require landscaping in the interior of the parking lots over 10,000 square feet in size. The code requires landscaping equal to 5% of the total area of the parking lot. The applicant should provide the calculation of this landscape area with submittal of the application. • Perking: The applicant should submit a parking analysis with the application evaluating how the proposed building demolition and parking lot construction would effect existing parking counts and City parking requirements. City parking regulations set different parking standards based on the type(s) of use. For some uses,'the code specifies a minimum and maximum range of parking. Where a single number of parking spaces is required, then that is considered to be both the minimum and maximum number of spaces to be provided for that land use. If parking counts, after the proposed building demolition and parking lot construction, are less than the required minimum or greater than the maximum number of spaces allowed by the code, then the applicant may request a modification from parking regulations. Modifications are approved by the Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department. • Boeing 10-60/1'0/65 Demo and Parking Expansion.DOC TOTHL P.05 CITY OF____TTON Date: .1 `( ` Development Services N t) 0 0 8 2 Planning&Zoning [AA- 99- I 55' 235-2550 City aff Authorization • Boeing Contact: R1 C�L PCYci Project Name: 17C�%1 Organization#: LA 3(o S W S\•/. Work Order/Function Appeals&Waivers 000/345.81.00.03 Site Plan Approval 000/345.81.00.17 '--L''�{' Binding Site Plan/Short Plat 000/345.81.00.04 Variance Fees 000/345.81.00.19 Conditional Use Fees 000/345.81.00.06 Planning/Zoning Misc.000/345.81.00.20 Environmental Review Fees 000/345.81.00.07 C50O C O Maps (taxed) 000/341.50.00.00 Grading&Filling Fees 000/345.81.00.11 Photo Copies 000/341.60.00.24 Lot Line Adjustment 000/345.81.00.12 Publications (taxed) 000/341.60.00.24 Routine Vegetation Mgmt. 000/345.81.00.15 Postage 000/05.519.90.42.01 • it. 7 Shoreline Substantial Dev 000/345.81.00.16 Tax 000/231.70.00.00 Other(Description)• ^J Acet# Amount Approved For Payment: Total: .2 G, 13 Boeing Representative Signature tun .�F+amber:...................................... . .. .........................................................................Ietvoice:l'�a�m6.�r�::;.;>:.;:.:;;.;:.;:.::�>::.>:.>:.;:.::;.;>:.;;;;:;<;.;:;.::.;:.;;:.»;::.>;:.:::.;:.>:.;:.;;:;;.:<..;;;:.;:.: ' DSpInzn201 7/31/92 • • • • • i N ****************!************************************************ City of Renton WA Reprinted: 11/16/99 13 :43 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Numbe : R9905733 Amount: 2, 513 . 86 11/16/99 13 :22 Payment Method: BILL Notation: BI,A #6-8 W5V Init: SM Project #: LUA99-155 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel Nol: 072305-9001 Site Address: 800 PARK AV N Location: NE CORNER OF PARK AV N & N 8TH ST Total Fees : 2, 513 . 86 This Payment 2, 513 . 86 Total ALL Pmts : 2,513 . 86 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 .345 . 81. 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 000 . 345 . 81. 00 . 0017 Site Plan Approval 2 , 000 . 00 000 . 05 .519 .90 .42 . 1 Postage 13 . 86 it _ . . . qq /55 (y ) • Ai 2) A tifl• . • _ . BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE GROUP RENT ON, WA L.,L-1'1 1 PU'd ,if2J • criv CF PARKING LOT 3B STORM WATER TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT Da 47Av- 2. 7,t., .1 • 1,1 pvii4it> es„44, 31741_on 4743 ; ee)Ectiirrts'i IRE& EC HGI PROJECT NO. 99-10629 REPORT NO. 001 OCTOBER 26 1999 REPORT NO. 99-10629/PROO1 STORM WATER TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT PROJECT NO. 99-10629 BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE GROUP PARKING LOT 3B RENTON,WA DATE: OCTOBER 26, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page L PROJECT OVERVIEW 1 II. PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS SUMMARY 1 III. OFF-SITE ANALYSIS 1 IV. RETENTION/DETENTION ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 2 V. CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 2 VL SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES 3 VIL BASIN AND COMMUNITY PLAN AREAS 3 VIII. OTHER PERMITS 3 IX. EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DESIGN 3 X. BOND QUANTITIES WORKSHEET,RETENTION/DETENTION FACILITY SUMMARY SHEET AND DECLARATION OF COVENANT 3 XL MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION MANUAL 3 FIGURES FIGURE 1: TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT(TIR)WORKSHEET FIGURE 2: SITE LOCATION NEIGHBORHOOD MAP FIGURE 3: (1 OF 2): EXISTING DRAINAGE BASIN BOUNDARY FIGURE 3: (2 OF 2): NEW DRAINAGE BASIN BOUNDARY FIGURE 4: PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE CALCULATION HGI PROJECT NO. 99-10629 BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE GROUP PARKING LOT 3B RENTON,WA PROJECT OVERVIEW The project is to construct an 18 acre,asphalt paved, parking lot containing approximately 1,270 parking stalls. The new parking lot design will incorporate in its layout,access to two existing parking lots that are located on the same block. The capacity of both existing parking lots is 626 cars total. The project is located in the City of Renton on the Boeing property bounded by N. 8th St,Park Ave. N.,and Garden Ave.N. Former use of the project site was for manufacturing and office use. Improvements included two large buildings, impervious paving, and a small amount of landscaping. As presently constructed the site has 94%impervious surfaces. The project site is drained to Lake Washington via the City of Renton storm drain system. The site is essentially flat and does not drain onto or receive drainage from adjacent properties. The buildings, except for a small portion of one, some of the existing paving and landscaping around the building exterior are currently being demolished. The project will include the construction of a new parking lot, consisting of approximately 15.9 acres,of impervious pavement surfaces, 2.1 acres of landscaping located around the perimeter and interior of the new lot and the portion of the existing building to remain. The impervious surface area of the project site after construction is completed will be 88%, less than that in it's former use. The new parking area will remain essentially flat except for slopes required for surface drainage. No water will be discharged on to or received from adjacent sites. The project's storm water collection system will be connected to the existing point of discharge to the City of Renton's system. Other than landscaping,there were/are no exposed soils in the former or future use of the site. All storm water is directly discharged to the City's storm water system with out detention. Current demolition activities are proceeding under Storm Water Permit Number S03-003753 and a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan is in place. Water quality treatment will be provided by the addition of coalescing plate oil/water separators at each discharge point(KCSWDM Special Requirement#6). Based upon the design requirements of Special Requirement#6 the largest coalescing plate oil/water separator will be designed for 1.5 CFS. There are no oil/water separators on the existing system. II. PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS SUMMARY Does.not apply III. OFF-SITE ANALYSIS The project will discharge to the City of Renton's storm water collection system. There is no other discharge of storm water from this site. The City's existing storm water system on Garden Ave. N. will be adequate for the new parking lot since the impervious surface of the project site is decreasing. The downstream drainage system on Garden Ave.N. has been successfully handling the site's existing runoff peak flows since:the 1960's. Page 1 of 3 K:\projects\Boeing\10629\REPORT NO 001.doc:gan 10/26/99 HGI PROJECT NO. 99-10629 BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE GROUP PARKING LOT 3B RENTON,WA No quantitative analysis was performed however,the capacity of the existing storm system shall be verified during the final design of the parking lot. IV. RETENTION/DETENTION ANALYSIS AND DESIGN Existing Site Hydrology No analysis of the existing site hydrology was performed because the site will remain essentially unchanged. Developed Site Hydrology No analysis of the existing site hydrology was performed because the site is essentially remaining unchanged. The new parking lot will have less impervious surface than the current use. Hydrologic Analysis A complete backwater analysis of the existing and new storm water conveyance systems will be performed. Retention/Detention System Does not apply V. CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN The existing 18 acres that make up the new construction area is impervious. Currently the storm drainage system at the site is broken up into three basins. The first drainage basin is designated as Basin 11. Basin 11's current make up is 5.6 acres of impervious area. The boundary of this basin is the east side of Building 10/65 and the paved surface between Building 10-65 and Garden Ave. The second drainage basin is designated Basin 12. Basin 12 is currently made up of 5.3 acres of impervious area. The boundary of this basin is the west side of Building 10-65 and the west and north pavement areas around Building 10-65. The third drainage basin is designated Basin 13. Currently Basin 13 is 9.6 acres of impervious area. The boundary of this basin is the area between the south side of Building 10-65 and 8th Ave. New Site Hydrology The paving surface will slope to a series of catch basins. The catch basins arranged in drainage basins approximate the drainage patterns of the existing improvements. The new construction will use three existing storm sewer system discharge points for existing Basins 11, 12,and 13. The new Basin 11 of 3.5 acres will use an existing 24"storm sewer pipe. The new Basin 12 of 5.2 acres will use an existing 21"CMP storm sewer pipe. The new Basin 13 of 11.8 acres will use an existing 30"storm sewer pipe. Each one of these discharge pipes connects to a 48"City of Renton's storm sewer system on Garden Ave. N.that eventually discharges into Lake Washington. Page 2 of 3 K:\projects\Boeing\10629\REPORT NO 001.doc:gan 10/26/99 nu a HGI PROJECT NO. 99-10629 BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE GROUP PARKING LOT 3B RENTON,WA The 18 acres of new construction for the parking lot will be 15.9 acres of impervious surface and 2.1 acres of new landscaping. The new construction will reduce the impervious surface area by 6%thereby reducing the peak flow runoff by approximately 5%. VI. SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES No expected special reports or studies are to be required for the construction of the parking lot. VII. BASIN AND COMMUNITY PLAN AREAS Does not apply VIII. OTHER PERMITS No other expected permits are a requirement by other agencies other than the City of Renton. 1 IX. EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DESIGN The Boeing Company has established a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan(SWPPP)for the demolition phase of this project. The SWPPP address storm water pollution prevention due to construction activities and control of pollutants other than sediment. The SWPPP requires strict inspection, management, and documentation of the BMP's that will be used at the site for storm watei pollution prevention. This SWPPP will be revised to include specifics related to the construction of the new lot as detailed design progresses and construction methods are established. X. BOND QUANTITIES WORKSHEET,RETENTION/DETENTION FACILITY SUMMARY SHEET AND DECLARATION OF COVENANT This(section does not apply XI. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION MANUAL The following are maintenance requirements that apply for a privately maintained drainage facility per the King County Surface Water Design Manual: No. 5 Catch Basins No. 10 Conveyance Systems No. 11 Grounds (Landscaping) Page 3 of 3 K:\projects\Boeing\10629\REPORT NO 001.doc:gan 10/26/99 FIGURE 1 Page l oT z King County Building and Land Development Division TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET PART 1 PROJECT OWNER AND PART 2 PROJECT LOCATION PROJECT ENGINEER AND DESCRIPTION Project Owner BOC/NG CO1401ME2C/,46, A/'' Project Name �?,Vc/Ao GO T .78 Address /2E.AalrAV Gte14S*/4/' 7 "7 Location 2 3 N Phone 2 0G- Y�Y- ,S 2-7 Township Project Engineer ' A v6- Jj0 2r'i c El m Range �E Company ,HA 2 2l f lL n UP /�G• Section 2 SUITE_8 00 /000 9E7J/J y!r/r4 r" Project Size /8 AC Address Phone EA 7r°L Gd.4 9S�/09 Upstream Drainage Basin Size 0 AC PART 3 TYPE OF PERMIT APPLICATION PART 4 OTHER PERMITS Subdivision 0 DOF/G HPA = Shoreline Management 0 Short Subdivision COE 404 Rockery Grading 0 DOE Dam Safety El Structural Vaults = Commercial 0 FEMA Floodplain 0 Other = Other COE Wetlands HPA PART 5 SITE'COMMUNITY AND DRAINAGE BASIN Community c -r y OF ac,UTO/l./ Drainage Basin L A if,6 6V'A TO PART 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS River Floodplain Stream' 0 Wetlands fl Critical Stream Reach Seeps/Springs Depressions/Swales [ I High Groundwater Table Lake = Groundwater Recharge Steep Slopes ® Other V 'o OP EP/R4 'o 7 Lakeside/Erosion Hazard • PART 7 SOILS Soil Type Slopes Erosion Potential Erosive Velocities SitTS rt.A T Ll<GI-/ L.0 r� El Additional Sheets Attatched 1/90 • • Page 2 of 2 King County Building and Land Development Division TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET •ART 8 DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS REFERENCE LIMITATION/SITE CONSTRAINT (RI Ch.4-Downstream Analysis N 7Aii- (M./Clf,4Al G EO FROM EJCf(P/,G Ca/1a/T/O.VS n Additional Sheets,Attatched PART 9 ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION 1 XI Sedimentation Facilities Q Stabilize Exposed Surface FW Stabilized Construction Entrance 71 Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities I—I Perimeter Runoff Control 1 <..I Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris n Clearing and Grading Restrictions LXJ Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities I Cover Practices Q Flag Limits of NGPES 1 xC Construction Sequence Q Other Q Other C7,) •ART 10. SURFACE WATER SYSTEM I I Grass Lined Channel O Tank In Infiltration Method of Analysis Rf Pipe System Q Vault Q Depression Z4 TIOA'A L I I Open Channel Q Energy Dissapator Q Flow Dispersal Compensation/Mitigation I I Dry Pond 0 Wetland n Waiver of Eliminated Site Storage Wet Pond n Stream 0 Regional Detention Brief Description of System Operation CLOSE° COA V E rA itl c E s r,r 7 EA-4 �/ (2/G/ GtrA TE k- S ER4 h A 770 .(. Facility Related Site Limitations Q Additional Sheets Attatched Reference Facility Limitation PART 11 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS PART 12 EASEMENTS/TRACTS (May require special structural review) n Drainage Easement Cast in Place Vault 0 Other n Access Easement n Retaining Wall Q Native Growth Protection Easement Q Rockery>4'High Q Tract Q Structural on Steep Slope Q Other e.. •ART 14 SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER I or a civil engineer under my supervision have visited the site.Actual site conditions as observed were incorporated into this worksheet and the attatchments. To the best of my knowledge the information provided here is accurate. Signed°'w• 1/90 LEGEND __________„2 / u. E)OSTING COMMERCIAL STRUCTURES G.�o�' IH Ar .�� q_8 PUGET SOUND POWER % IH L_J ZONING BOUNDRY �p� & LIGHT COMPANY A IH INDUSTRIAL HEAVY p�� i co COMMERCIAL OFFICE V \ CA COMMERCIAL ARTERIAL IL INDUSTRIAL LICHT 0 R—X RESIDENTIAL ZONE \ d, O ; e-37 10-47 ��� G1 1 IF'. H LOT o ‘0,....._,..,,, y : ............ I �\ EXISTING PARKING LOT 4 Zo .Q 1°-4 to-1o. (t1111iL 7 4 r' TO REMAIN \\Li I 10-12 10-56 h y GP ,� IIIAIAA/ LOT s � �1 An 1 _g 11; I_ 10-56,Tl {t 10-I1�• 10-57 10-55 w //1 v.A'1 1� -LJ \1\ , �Cl/i1jA11A=Sv IHDISC ( 4 11011111111 • IH o 1 /,411410107.% Z _a. ,°-5°, ,°-5, - rj! � NEW BOEING 5 fi '� 2 �� til o It-a ����O� ,1 PARKING LOT SITE ■ �+7�.= , I 0 o 10-172�10-5 10-17 ----� II V%ilik\ 5-40 1 ', • Q \76\1-7. x� LOT 7 �, _ io-900!� ii_pN. TH STREET ,HEXISTING PARKING LOT cn q_S a-93 10_60 TO REMAIN FENCE o I 1 .. D l ��, � 10-65 5 a I*:'e. • 41 S61�a° �-B2 f1 — — 1 I....- it • N BNSF RAILROAD 10 n ; 4_08 4-09-� ,i r f --r , viz I .q-63' a-7a�I 10-71 �U I— g. ti \ 4-76 •IH. 4-fi6� I ■ co- 4-64 4-4°C -10 7' ,0_20 CI I. CO Z 0 u a-69/ 10 4C36 10-72I LN._6TH , EET ,0 I 1 IH p • O 5-40 s. 5-27 zr • Ij YZ ,0-16 z r —— — c 0 0i w r � w PACCAR I Z 'o LOT B w a ga w I 111 or 7 o m o --, o / ,Nv W < e1;5-a7T C' ill /zil i , tia .-4itz j 1 ik,z‘ckte;.644 am za . I � —lnr1nI II II /■ m0 a< \\1\el1BLIC/ J err ¢ `\ \ / 7 - / a \`5-26\\ / - 1 � 5 09\\ / 5-409 5-02 � 1 U0od i ' i � E \ _ . FIGURE 2 • E. PLAN VIEW N Harris Group Inc. SCALE: 1' = 400' 99-10594 EWOTT ssv MGM ifAViPO4D 0Oatsv REMS01 !if • wi1i0+w DMACCEPTABILITY CLIMaiK. 0.04.99 sennc C SlSD l.svmw 5'4a " ° RIA'° PERMIT Na/om 1°.15.99 • tta moioa r�+« NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP 0 10.15.99 OLINFOE,AraW 9.1:1KJ1110N 6 APVR01'fD S.FRAMCUN 8.Ot99 '- - -- � R '"`L PROPOSED PARKING LOT�B N 1 a APmom ar DOf. WC D.DORIOER 8.04.99 '`J AAvovin ° 6.06.99 RENTON SITE xe~a 982179 V Arwmwm CML MASTER RENTON°" R1N-YD-NI �� �0C — . ....„- I . 0. • ... . ,4,.. .. • .. -� EXISTING BASIN 13 ° o / o 0 9.6 ACRES ile f' EXISTING BASIN 11 5.6 ACRES -a �-- EXISTING o : r �, I fa 0 10-68 110-65 BASIN 10 I -- ------------ ----a - 10-60 = 1 • oo• 4. 1 .9 ACRES EXISTING BASIN 12 ' 5.3. ACRES ; I =1 1 : ° i , 1 ‘ 1 ♦`\ - ~^ I 1 1I ° EXISTING ° \ \ e` o ° ° o I I LANDSCAPING ° Pe- � ; ; ;•;� - 1 0 0 0 \ p K _ • ' I I 0 l' 0-tea- •_•' ( °0 ♦ ODOR = - _ _ _ � o T ° T \\ O \o � —" I ,r1 I I lip— i��° \ \ \ \ I __ - -- -- _ _ _ _ _ - - - - r i 1 -111-:_ _ _ I N 6 ' 1 • SCALE IN FEET \\ ` - SCALE 1'=fi0 tg' >\,. ". o '\ \ \ II • FIGURE 3ii - r 1 OF -2 lY }Harris Group Inc. • 99-10629 m WWI !n MA MI OM rn fa®+ to unman OM ACCEPTABILITY MG BLOou °i01359 SPEIMIE C RUa MG swam DM tNs EPTanon maim CKOMO EXISTING DRAINAGE BASIN BOUNDRY 991089 ` SPECFlrA901 6/PPROVED P.DORMER 10,13.99 BQE,�W• A°° cam 0 rz DOWER 10.1399 MIL PROPOSED PARKING LOT 3B s vst Cl - APPROVW 'a"9' RENTON SITE Am PO. COPP PO. a APPROA.0 RENTON° CAE MASTER �"n NEW COALESCING PLATE EXISTING 30" DISCHARGE POINT OIL/WATER SEPARATOR FOR DRAINAGE BASIN #13 1/3 OF A 2 YEAR STORM Q 25 YEAR = 10 CFS CARIADI AYE NEW COALESCING PLATE — - - , _ N - OIL/WATER SEPARATOR �� _ �t � �r j• 1/3 OF A 2 YEAR STORM � / � , - A I -�/- EXISTING 24" DISCHARGE POINT EXISTING PARKING LOT 3A r. FOR DRAINAGE BASIN #11 � /� To* (� . s� TO REMAIN UNCHANGED 41 Q25YR = 7.8CFS - w ' G P XISTING 21" CMP DISCHARGE POINT / `4* .---sTs NEW R DRAINAGE BASIN #12 / BASIN 13 0 25 YR = 10.9 CFS410 SAS o ° s �� ��°w - NEW COALESCING P ATE - TO /rl 1 Y . 11 .8 ACRES { II OIL/WATER SEPARA R / `�°w `N ` s� U , ' 1/3 OF A 2 YEAR S ORM �? ° ° 4 EXISTING PARKING LOT j- - 4 *.s s� `�_ � `,� s •�l __DISCHARGE POINT 3./"-� NEB CC �0 sNS �, f 0.1 To Gj P` NI •�- c! `'v Sty `�° `�°•/ � W 3 8 _. • % 11 i- mow sts ��ow ," `�°w 1111 `Flow FLow � I STI N G \ \\ ��x O. _ Q / T `\ �D s ,C\NG,„-T 38 ��°w `ott —srs sr.; ■ sts ■ srs—. I ASIN 10 / �11.9 ACRES -s ��`°w ��� °w` \2��� ��oW . o La —� ' O EXISTING PARKING LOT 5 S`N -' •-sTs ° • TO REMAIN UNCHANGED `N P s `` ��owFLOW ROW 1 \ • . y srs -a \F�°w `� . �j� to-fis ' 1 �N S ■/�) G� % ( T CHILLER ANNEX - li . 4 ,..,,,,..._ .. •. ,` � ` • i i i i i i SOS ,FLOW srs l ,FLO�Y sue- `C 1 0 FLOW ° FLOW o I ,FLOW \ . , / ( i I - - MC —--..i3 la 1\ O b �— ` `.. OOO — /,——� �__. _ _ _ goo..u` _ __m�3. _ _ _ o \\\‘'*a �o f. : Y . ,-- u -1 01 �I \ \ \ \ MI 9 - 1 I - I D�O `` ```` • OD 0 6 12 0' • 1 • \` `� c I SCALE IN FEET \ SCALE I'=60' `�, ° — FIGURE 3 i > >,\*. 0 \ \- ► nn IGU ll I , - 2 OF 2 il Harris Group Inc. - 99-10629 • DRAWN$T11 MOOS a' APPROAD 11111 m R6SON m. SEE ACCEPTABILITY P.uNC&OOM 610.1399 NEW DRAINAGE BASIN BOUNDRY 991089 0 a't10.15.99 Pas anti N'PRR 0.DOWER 10.1199 ytuy g3LISFAREZAW® �Oi1G1 5 wv:wEn N'"�' ^"L PROPOSED PARKING LOT 3B 2 .craws er orrr. con O.DOWER 10.1399 C2 R. 10.1199 RENTON SITE .05 �.•asi AP° `D CML MASTER - RENTON we w FIGURE 4 10-60/65 PARKING LOT BOEING RENTON ANALYSIS AND ROUTE DESIGN RATIONAL METHOD PER KCSWDM SECTION 4.3.3 - DRAINAGE BASIN 12 BASIN 11 BASIN 13 BASIN - 25 YEAR PEAK FLOW DRAINAGE BASIN AREA 5.11 3.35 11.76 TIME OF CONCENTRATION 8 7 33 TOTAL PRECIPITATION 3.45 3.45 3.45 UNIT PEAK RAINFALL 0.69 0.75 0.27 PEAK RAINFALL INTENSITY 2.4 2.6 0.9 RUNOFF COEFICIENTS 0.9 0.9 0.9 PEAK FLOW(CFS) 10.9 7.8 10.0 2 YEAR PEAK FLOW DRAINAGE BASIN AREA 5.11 3.35 11.76 TIME OF CONCENTRATION 8 7 33 TOTAL PRECIPITATION 2 2 2 UNIT PEAK RAINFALL 0.47 0.51 0.21 PEAK RAINFALL INTENSITY 0.9 1.0 0.4 RUNOFF COEFICIENTS 0.9 0.9 0.9 PEAK FLOW(CFS) 4.4 3.1 4.4 CORE REQUIREMENT#6 WATER QUALITY DRAINAGE BASIN AREA 5.11 3.35 11.76 • TIME OF CONCENTRATION 8 7 33 TOTAL PRECIPITATION (P/3) 0.667 0.667 0.667 UNIT PEAK RAINFALL 0.47 0.51 0.21 PEAK RAINFALL INTENSITY 0.3 _ 0.3 0.1 RUNOFF COEFICIENTS 0.9 0.9 0.9 PEAK FLOW(CFS) 1.5 1.0 1.5 BOEING PARKING LOT 3B TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIONAL METHOD PREDICTED PEAK FLOWS OUTLET BASIN_ BASIN -1Tc- COVER - BASIN - - BASIN- COVER -BASIN - BASIN Tc COVER Tc FOR BASIN REACH I HIEGHT COEF. I REACH I HIEGHT 1Tc COEF. I REACH I HIEGHT COEF. I BASIN ( I I I (#) NO.1 (FT) NO.1(FT) NO.1(K) NO.2(FT) NO.2(FT) NO.2(K) NO.3(FT) NO.3(FT) NO.3(K) (MIN) BASIN 12 100 2 1200 640 2 1950 370 3.3 2350 8.13 BASIN 11 160 1 1200 700 3 1950 0 0 7.17 BASIN 13 80 0.5 1200 700 0.1 1950 400 2.8 2350 32.91 . • COEFFICIENTS FOR BACKWATER CALCULATOR GROUND COVER COEFFICIENTS TYPE OF COVER K(GROUND COVER COEF.) FOREST WITH HEAVY GROUND COVER 150 7 TIME OF CONCENTRATION MINIMUM TILLAGE CULTIVATION 280. SHORT PASTURE GRASS OR LAWN 420 T -(L)^1.5/(K*(H)"0.5) NEARLY BARE GROUND 600 GRASSED WATERWAY OR SMALL ROAD 900 Tc=TIME ON CONCENTRATION IN MINUTES • PAVED AREA 1200 L=LENGTH OF DRAINAGE BASIN IN FEET GUTTER FLOW 0.25 FEET DEEP 1500 H=HEIGHT OF THE DRAINAGE BASIN IN FEET 0.50 FEET DEEP 2400 K=GROUND COVER COEFFICIENT(FT/MIN) 0.75 FEET DEEP 3100 STORM SEWERS CONCRETE CMP N=0.012 N=0.024 12 INCH DIAM. 3000 1500 18 INCH DIAM. 3900 1950 24 INCH DIAM. 4700 2350 OPEN CHANNEL FLOW(N=0.040) NARRO MEDIU WIDE W/D=1 W/D=2 W/D=9 1 FOOT DEEP 1100 1500 2000 2 FEET DEEP 1800 2300 3100 4 FEET DEEP 2800 3700 5000 CPS OIL WATER SEPARATOR t" BOEING PARKING LOT 3B 1 DESIGN CONSTRAINTS A DATA INPUT SMALLEST REMOVEABLE OIL DROPLET IS 25 MICRON PARTICAL SPECIFIC GRAVITY 0.908 (SG) OIL CONCENTRATIONS ARE BASED ON 0.25 Q/AC*HR CARRIER SPECIFIC GRAVITY 1.01 (SG) QUART OF OIL PER ACRE HOUR OF STORM FLOW GRAVITY 32.2 (FTS"2) THE FIRST THREE HOURS OF STORM OIL CONCENTRATION CARRIER KENT. VISCOSITY 1.660E-05 (FT 2/S) IS INCREASED TO 3 QUARTS/ACRE+HR TO REPRESENT THE • CPS PLATE SPACES PER FOOT 18 (SPACE/FT) INITIAL STORM FLUSH AFTER LONG DRY PERIODS (M-PAK 1/4"-31 \ 1/2"m18) STORM DESIGN FLOW IS BASED ON A 6 MONTH 24 HOUR CPS HEIGHT 4 (FEET) SBUH TYPE I SCS RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION CPS WIDTH 8 (FEET) 6 MONTH 24 HOUR STORM REPRESENTS 91% OF ALL STORM RUNOFF CPS LENGTH 2 (FEET) PPM EFFLUENT RESULTS ARE BASED ON DATA AREA CONTRIBUTING TO OIL FLOW 5.11 ACRES FROM 20 YEARS OF STORM FLOW MODELING BY FACET INTERNATIONAL MAX. 0/W DESIGN FLOW 4.4 CFS OUTFALL OIL CONCENTRATION (PPM) REPRESENTS BOTH TREATED FLOW GPM/FT"2 CPS HOZ. AREA < 25 61.71 (GPM/FT"2) FROM THE 0/W SEPARATOR WHEN FLOWS ARE BELOW MAX DESIGN FLOW OVERALL STORM OIL FLOW VOL. 8.34 (GAL) AND STORM BYPASS/SEPRATOR TREATED FLOW MIX. OVERALL STORM OIL COLLECTED 6.78 (GAL) • STORM TOTAL STORM STORM FLOW MIN. OIL SIZE STORM FLOW OIL OUTFALL OIL TOTAL STORM TOTAL OIL VOL. VELOCITY FLOW INTO 0/W SEP. REMOVABLE CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION OIL FLAW VOL. COLLECTED < 5.5 REQ. (CFS) i (CFS) _ (MICRON) (PPM) (PPM) (GAL/HOUR) (GAL/HOUR) (FT/MIN) . 0 0.1 0.1 28 320 5.80 0.86 0.85 0.25 • 1 0.2 0.2 40 160 5.26 0.86 0.83 0.50 2 0.4 0.4 57 80 4.76 0.86 0.81 1.00 3 0.6 0.6 70 18 1.50 0.29 0.26 ' 1.50 4 0.8 0.8 80 13 1.44 0.29 0.26 2.00 5 1 1 90 11 1.39 0.29 0.25 2.50 6 • 1.2 1.2 98 9 1.36 0.29 0.24 3.00 7 1.4 1.4 106 8 1.33 0.29 0.24 3.50 8 1.6 1.6 114 7 1.30 0.29 0.23 4.00 9 1.8 1.8 120 6 1.28 0.29 0.23 4.50 10 2 2 127 5 1.26 0.29 0.22 5.00 11 2.2 2.2.. 133 5 1.25 0.29 0.21 5.50 , , 12 2.3 2.3 136 5 1.24 0.29 0.21 5.75 13 2.4 2.4 139 4 1.23 0.29 0.21 6.00 14 2.5 2.5 142 4 1.22 0.29 0.20 6.25 15 2.6 2.6 145 4 1.22 0.29 0.20 6.50 16 2.7 2.7 147 4 1.21 0.29 0.20 6.75 • 17 2.8 2.8 150 4 1.21 0.29 0.20 7.00 18 2.9 2.9 153 4 1.20 0.29 0.19 7.25 19 3 3 155 4 1.19 0.29 0.19 7.50 20 3.2 3.2 161 3 1.18 0.29 0.19 8.00 21 3.4 3.4 165 3 1.17 0.29 0.18 8.50 22 3.6 3.6 170 3 1.16 0.29 0.17 9.00 L . Current • PARKING LOT 3B OIL WATER SEPARATOR 7.00 - 3.5 6.00 0 0 - 3 a 5.00 a - 2.5 0- 4.00 a. • 0 - 2 3.00 I- w - 1.5 0 0 2.00 -J 0 - 1 -J 1.00 - - 0.5 - 0 0 5 10 . 15 20 STORM TIME(HOURS) — - OIL INFLOW(PPM/100) —OIL OUTFLOW(PPM) - - - STORM BY-PASS —FLOW INTO 01W UNIT - Page 1 • KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL NO. 5 - CATCH BASINS (Continued) Maintenance Conditions When Maintenance Results Expected • Component ! Defect is Needed When Maintenance Is Performed Catch Basin Cover Cover Not in Place Cover is missing or only partially in place. Catch basin cover is closed. Any open catch basin requires maintenance. Locking Mechanism cannot be opened by one Mechanism opens with proper tools. • Mechanism Not maintenance person with proper tools. Woiking Bolts into frame have less than 1/2 inch of thread. Cover Difficult to One maintenance person cannot remove Cover can be removed by one Remove lid after applying 80 lbs.of lift;intent is maintenance person. keep cover from sealing off access to maintenance. Ladder Ladder Rungs Ladder is unsafe due to missing rungs, Ladder meets design standards and Unsafe misalignment,rust,cracks,or sharp allows maintenance person safe access. edges. Metal Grates Grate with opening wider than 7/8 inch. Grate openings meet design standards. (f applicable) Trash and Debris . Trash and debris that is blocking more Grate free of trash and debris. than 20%of grate surface. Damaged or Grate missing or broken member(s)of Grate is in place and meets design Missing the grate. standards. fe) • • • • • • • • • • A-6 1/90 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL NO. 5 - CATCH BASINS • -0-'. . - t, . • . Maintenance • Conditions When Maintenance Results Expected Component • Defect ' Is Needed -When Maintenance is Performed General • Trash&Debris Trash or debris of more than 1/2 cubic No trash or debris located immediately In (Includes foot which is located immediately in front front of catch basin opening. Sediment) of the catch basin opening or is blocking • capacity of basin by more than 10%. Trash or debris(In the basin)that No trash or debris in the catch basin. exceeds 1/3 the-depth from the bottom of basin to Invert of the lowest pipe into or out of the basin. • Trash or debris In any inlet or outlet pipe Inlet and outlet pipes free of trash or blocking more than 1/3 of its height. debris. • Dead animals or vegetation that could No dead animals or vegetation present • generate odors that would cause within the catch basin. complaints or dangerous gases(e.g., methane). Deposits'of garbage exceeding 1 cubic No condition present which would attract foot in volume. or support the breeding of insects or rodents. Structural Damage Corner of frame extends more than 3/4 Frame is even with curb. to Frame and/or inch past curb face into the street(if Top Slab applicable). Top slab has holes larger than 2 square Top slab is free of holes and cracks. inches or cracks wider than 1/4 inch (intent is to make sure all material is - ,_;iT1 running into the basin). 7:7,3 "/ Frame not sitting flush on top slab,i.e., Frame is sitting flush on top slab. , • separation of more than 3/4 inch of the frame from the top slab. Cracks in Basin Cracks wider than 1/2 inch and longer Basin replaced or repaired to design Walls/Bottom than 3 feet,any evidence of soil particles standards. . • entering catch basin through cracks,or maintenance person judges that structure ' is unsound. • Cracks wider than 1/2 inch and longer No cracks more than 1/4 inch wide at the ' than 1 foot at the joint of any inlet/outlet joint of inlet/outlet pipe. pipe or any evidence of soil particles entering catch basin through cracks. Settlement/ : Basin has settled more than 1 inch or has Basin replaced or repaired to design Misalignment rotated more than 2 inches out of standards. • alignment. Fire Hazard Presence of chemicals such as natural No flammable chemicals present. gas,oil,and gasoline. Vegetation Vegetation growing across and blocking No vegetation blocking opening to basin. more than 10%of the basin opening. Vegetation growing in inlet/outlet pipe .No vegetation or root growth present. joints that is more than six inches tall and less than six inches apart. Pollution Nonflammable chemicals of more than No pollution present other than surface 1/2 cubic foot per three feet of basin film. length. (&,,, - . ' A-5 1/90 KING. COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL NO. 10 - C,ONVEYANCE.SYSTEMS (Pipes & Ditches) Maintenance; Conditions When Maintenance Results Expected Component Defect Is Needed When Maintenance Is Performed • Pipes • Sediment&Debris Accumulated sediment that exceeds 20% Pipe cleaned of all sediment and debris. of the diameter of the pipe. Vegetation Vegetation that reduces free movement of All vegetation removed so water flows water through pipes. freely through pipes. Damaged Protective coating is damaged;rust is Pipe repaired or replaced. causing more than 50%deterioration to any part of pipe. Any dent that decreases the cross section Pipe repaired,or replaced. • area of pipe by more than 20%. Open Ditches Trash&Debris Trash and debris exceeds 1 cubic foot Trash and debris cleared from ditches. per 1,000 square feet of ditch and slopes. Sediment Accumulated sediment that exceeds 20% Ditch cleaned/flushed of all sediment and of the design depth. debris so that It matches design. Vegetation Vegetation that reduces free movement of Water flows freely through ditches. water through ditches. Erosion Damage to See'Ponds"Standard No. 1 See"Ponds"Standard No. 1 Slopes Rock Lining Out of Maintenance person can see native soil Replace rocks to design standard. Place or Missing (If beneath the rock lining. Applicable) • Catch Basins See"Catch Basins"Standard No.5 See"Catch Basins"Standard No.5 Debris Barriers See"Debris Barriers"Standard No.6 See'Debris Barriers"Standard No.6 (e.g.,Trash Rack) • • A-11 1/90 • • KING COUNTY,!WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL NO. 11 - GROUNDS (Landscaping) • Maintenance Conditions When Maintenance Results Expected a Component Defect is Needed :When Maintenance Is Performed General • Weeds! Weeds growing In more than 20%of the Weeds present In less than 5%of the _ (Nonpoisonous) landscaped area(trees end shrubs only). landscaped area. Safety Hazard Any presence of poison ivy or other No poisonous vegetation present In a poisonous vegetation. landscaped area. Trash or Litter Paper,can,bottles,totalling more than 1 Area clear of litter. cubic foot within a landscaped area(trees and shrubs only)of 1,000 square feet. Trees and Shrubs Damage Limbs or parts of trees or shrubs that are Trees and shrubs with less than 5%of the split or broken which affect more than total foliage with split or broken limbs. 25%of the total foliage of the tree or ' shrub. • Trees or shrubs that have been blown Tree or shrub in place free of injury. down or knocked over. Trees or shrubs which are not adequately Tree or shrub In place and adequately supported or are leaning over,causing supported;remove any dead or diseased exposure of the roots. trees. • • • • • A-12 1/90 I - . „ _ ,55 (9 ) TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Date: October 26, 1999 iuy �01E� To: Lee Haro Oer `01.5 City of Renton From: Jeff Haynie, P.E. (� Entranco Subject: Boeing Lot 3B— Renton Traffic Impact Analysis Entranco Project No. 99165-60 This technical memorandum documents the.traffic impact analysis for the proposed Boeing parking Lot 3B in Renton, Washington. This traffic study includes the following: • An estimate of the existing number of trips to and from Boeing Lot 6 • A distribution of existing trips to and from Lot 6 • A redistribution of Lot 6 trips to and from the proposed Lot 3B • An operational analysis at eight intersections in the project vicinity with and I without the proposed Lot 3B 1 • A queuing analysis to determine the effect of the proposed project on left-turn storage at the intersections of Lake Washington Blvd./Garden Avenue/Park - Drive and Park Avenue/North 10th Street. • PROJECT DESCRIPTION The estimated opening date for the proposed Lot 3B project is May/June of 2000. In general, the new parking lot is proposed to be located in the area bounded by Park Avenue on the west, Garden Avenue on the east, and North 8th Street on the south. Two existing parking areas, Lot 5 and Lot 3A, and two existing buildings currently occupy the • site. With the construction of Lot 3B, the two existing buildings would be demolished except,for a small portion of one which would be retained. The construction of Lot 3B would also eliminate the need for the existing Boeing parking area (Lot 6) located east of Garden Avenue between Park Drive and North 8th Street. This area would be left vacant. Please'refer to the existing and proposed site plans in Appendix A. /j - 4 W R:\99165-60\LOT3B.DOC cpf/jjh 10/25/99 1 Access to the parking area bounded by Park Avenue, Garden Avenue, and North 8th Street (Lot 3A, Lot 5, and Lot 3B) will be provided at the following five locations: • Park Avenue/North 10th Street (full access, signalized) • Park Avenue/South Access Driveway (right-in/right-out, stop controlled) • North 8th Street/Garden Avenue (west) (full access, signalized) ti • Garden Avenue/South Access Driveway (full access, stop controlled) • Garden Avenue/North Access Driveway (full access, stop controlled) The intersections of Park Avenue/North 10th Street, Garden Avenue/South Access Driveway, and Garden Avenue/North Access Driveway currently provide access to existing Lots 3A and 5. As of the date of this study; existing access was not available at the intersections of Park Avenue/South Access Driveway and North 8th Street/Garden Avenue (west). The following summarizes existing and future parking stall counts: Existing Parking Existing parking stalls on Lots 3A and 5 and 1,003 parking surrounding existing buildings Existing parking stalls on Lot 6 3,214 Total existing parking 4,217 Future Parking Existing stalls to remain (Lots 3A and 5) 626 • New parking stalls on Lot 3B 2,101 Total future parking 2,727 Future Parking — Existing Parking -1,490 As shown above, parking would be reduced by 1,490 stalls (35%) with the construction of Lot 3B'and the vacation of Lot 6. Although two existing buildings would be demolished and parking would be reduced, this project would not necessarily result in a decrease in Boeing employees. When existing buildings are demolished and/or parking is reduced, a developer or owner !._ may receive a credit for the existing traffic associated with the existing use. However, the traffic analysis outlined in this technical memorandum does not assume the reduction in R:\99165-60\LOT3B.doc cpfffjh 10/25/99 2 traffic that would normally be associated with the removal of parking and existing buildings. Therefore, this traffic analysis should be considered conservative and represents a worst-case scenario. METHODOLOGY Our analysis includes a study of the traffic operations both with and without the construction of Boeing Lot 3B. Operations were analyzed during the a.m. peak hour (peak hour between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m.), p.m. peak hour(peak hour between 4:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m.), and afternoon peak hour (peak hour between 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m.). The a.m. and p.m. peak hours are assumed to be the highest hours for traffic on the adjacent roads, while the afternoon peak hour is assumed to be the highest hour for traffic associated with Boeing. Based,on discussions with the City of Renton, the following two scenarios were analyzed: Scenario 1: Year 2000 with Existing Lot 6 (baseline conditions) Scenario 2: Year 2000 with Proposed Lot 3B To obtain year 2000 baseline traffic volumes, 1999 existing volumes were increased using a 2 percent annual growth rate. This growth rate is consistent with what has been used by the City of Renton for other developments in the project vicinity. The City of Renton also requested that traffic from two proposed developments in the project vicinity be included in the baseline traffic volumes. These projects are the Southport project and the Stoneway Concrete plant. Southport, a mixed use office/retail/residential development, is proposed just south of Gene Coulon Park along Lake Washington. Access to the Southport Development is provided by a shared access with the park on Lake Washington Boulevard. The traffic impacts of the Southport Development are documented as part of the Southport EIS. Base4n this information, the trips associated with Southport Plan C are included in the year 2000 baseline traffic volumes. The Southport EIS does not document trip generation for the afternoon peak hour. However, 24-hour traffic counts conducted at a similar mixed use office/retail site in Kirkland showed that trip generation during the peak hour between 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. is,approximately 65 percent of the trip generation during the peak hour between 4:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. Therefore, to estimate the traffic associated with Southport during the afternoon peak hour, a conservative factor of 75 percent was applied to the Southport p.m. peak hour trip generation. The Stoneway Concrete plant is proposed to be located on the west side of Houser Way between Lake Washington Boulevard and North 8th Street. The traffic analysis for this project is summarized in a June 18, 1999 memorandum to the City of Renton. Based on this analysis, the a.m., afternoon, and p.m. peak hour trips associated with Stoneway are included in the year 2000 baseline traffic volumes. Year 2000 baseline traffic volumes are summarized in Appendix B. R:\99165-601LOT3B.doc cpf/jjh 10/25/99 3 - I Our analysis was based on the operations at the five access points to the proposed Lot 3B, and at the following three study intersections: I • Lake Washington Blvd./Garden Avenue/Park Drive (signalized) • North 8th Street/Park Avenue (signalized) . North 8th Street/Garden Avenue (east) (signalized) Intersection geometry and signal phasing was based on existing conditions, except at Lake Washington Blvd./Garden Avenue/Park Drive where mitigation is proposed as part of the Southport development. As documented in the Southport EIS, the proposed intersection improvements include adding a second southbound left-turn lane, and converting one of the eastbound through lanes into a second eastbound left-turn lane. The channelization assumed for the traffic analysis is summarized on figures in Appendix C. TRIP GENERATION To estimate the number of trips associated with the proposed Boeing Lot 3B, a.m., p.m., and afternoon counts were conducted at the access points to the existing Lot 6. With the vacation of Lot 6 and the construction of Lot 3B, the estimated trips to and from Lot 3B is assumed to be identical to the number of trips to and from the existing Lot 6. As stated earlier)this assumption should be conservative since the parking is being reduced by 35 percent and no reductions were applied to the existing trips to and from Lot 6. Table 1 summarizes the estimated number of trips to and from Lot 3B. Table 1 Boeing Lot 3B Trip Generation Summary Entering Trips Exiting Trips Total Trips A.M. Peak Hour(highest hour between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m.) Vehicle Trips 68 37 105 Afternoon Peak Hour(highest hour between 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m.) Vehicle Trips 105 518 623 P.M. Peak Hour(highest hour between 4:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m.) Vehicle Trips 25 108 133 it R:\99165-60\LOT3B.doc cpfljh 10/25/99 4 r ' TRIP DISTRIBUTION The distribution of existing trips to and from Lot 6 was based on existing travel patterns in the project vicinity. To determine year 2000 traffic volumes with Lot 3B, the distribution of existing Lot 6 trips was first subtracted from the existing baseline traffic volumes. Then, existing Lot 6 trips were redistributed to and from the proposed Lot 3B access points. It should be noted that existing traffic volumes entering and exiting Lots 3A and 5 were assumed to remain constant. The distribution of Lot 6 trips and Lot 3B trips are shown on figures in Appendix D. Year 2000 traffic volumes with Lot 3B are summarized in Appendix B. ANALYSIS ASSUMPTIONS Analysis of intersection operations consisted of level of service (LOS) calculations. In addition, calculations for average and 95`h percentile queue lengths were conducted at Lake Washington.Blvd./Garden Avenue/Park Drive and at Park Avenue/North 10th Street per the request of the City of Renton. Intersection LOS was based on methodology outlined in the Transportation Research Board's 1997 Highway Capacity Manual using Signal97 software for signalized intersections and HCS software for unsignalized intersections. LOS criteria for signalized intersections was based on the average control delay for the entire intersection. LOS criterial for unsignalized intersections was based on the average control delay for the worst movement, typically on one of the side-street approaches. Average and 95th percentile queue lengths at the signalized intersections were based on the standard "red time" formula assuming a Poisson distribution (i.e., random arrivals). The 95`h percentile queue lengths represent a condition that is exceeded only 5 percent of the time. ANALYSIS RESULTS Tables 2, 3, and 4 summarize the results of the LOS analysis at the five access points to Lot 3B and at the three study intersections during the a.m., afternoon, and p.m. peak hours,'respectively. The detailed LOS calculation sheets are.included in Appendix E. R:\99165-60\LOT3B.doc cpf/jjh 10/25/99 5 bah' Table 2 A.M. Peak Hour Level of Service Results Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Year 2000 Year 2000 with Lot 6 with Lot 3B (with Southport (with Southport Intersection &Stoneway) &Stoneway) Signalized Intersections: Lk. Wa. Blvd./Garden Ave./Park Dr. LOS C C Delay' 32.9 sec/veh 32.5 sec/veh Park Avenue/North 10th Street LOS B B Delay' 18.9 sec/veh 19.3 sec/veh Park Avenue/North 8'h Street LOS C C Delay' 31.7 sec/veh 31.6 sec/veh North 8th Street/Garden Ave. (west) LOS B B Delay' 10.5 sec/veh 10.5 sec/veh North 8'h Street/Garden Ave. (east) LOS B B Delay' 16.8 sec/veh 16.8 sec/veh Stop-Controlled Intersections: Park Avenue/South Access Driveway Worst WB RT Movement LOS NA B Delay' 11.3 sec/veh Garden Ave./South Access Driveway Worst WB LT-TH-RT EB LT Movement i LOS A A Delay' 8.9 sec/veh 8.9 sec/veh Garden Ave./North Access Driveway Worst EB LT-TH-RT EB LT Movement LOS A A Delay' 9.5 sec/veh 8.9 sec/veh ' Delay is average control delay. As shown in table 2, during the a.m. peak hour, all of the intersections analyzed operate at LOS C or better with or without Boeing Lot 3B, with Southport and Stoneway. R:\99165-6k0T38.doc cpll]jh 10/25/99 6 f bikx, Table 3 Afternoon Peak Hour Level of Service Results Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Year 2000 Year 2000 with Lot 6 with Lot 3B (with Southport (with Southport Intersection &Stoneway) &Stoneway) Signalized Intersections: Lk.Wa. Blvd./Garden Ave./Park Dr. LOS D C Delay' 35.1 sec/veh 34.3 sec/veh Park Avenue/North 10th Street LOS C D Delay' 32.1 sec/veh 39.2 sec/veh Park Avenue/North 8'h Street LOS C C Delay' 33.2 sec/veh 32.8 sec/veh _ I North 8'h Street/Garden Ave. (west) LOS A B Delay' 9.5 sec/veh 10.5 sec/veh North 8'h Street/Garden Ave. (east) LOS C B Delay' 21.4 sec/veh 18.0 sec/veh Stop-Controlled Intersections: Park Avenue/South Access Driveway Worst WB RT Movement LOS NA B Delay' 12.7 sec/veh Garden Ave./South Access Driveway Worst EB LT TH RT EB LT Movement LOS C C Delay' 16.3 sec/veh 20.9 sec/veh Garden Ave./North Access Driveway Worst WB LT-TH-RT EB LT Movement LOS C B Delay' 18.4 sec/veh 11.7 sec/veh 1 Delay is average control delay. As shown in table 3, during the afternoon peak hour, all of the intersections analyzed operate at LOS D or better with or without Boeing Lot 3B, with Southport and Stoneway. R:19 91 65-60SLOT3B.doc cpf/jjjh 10/25/99 7 Table 4 P.M. Peak Hour Level of Service Results Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Year 2000 Year 2000 with Lot 6 with Lot 3B (with Southport (with Southport Intersection &Stoneway) &Stoneway) Signalized Intersections: Lk.Wa. Blvd./Garden Ave./Park Dr. LOS C C Delay' 34.9 sec/veh 34.6 sec/veh P ark Avenue/North 10th Street LOS C C --' Delay' 23.0 sec/veh 24.4 sec/veh P ark Avenue/North 8th Street LOS C C Delay' 28.7 sec/veh 28.6 sec/veh NCI rth 8th Street/Garden Ave. (west) LOS B B Delay' 10.7 sec/veh 10.5 sec/veh North 8th Street/Garden Ave. (east) LOS B B Delay' 14.6 sec/veh 15.3 sec/veh Stop-Controlled Intersections: Park Avenue/South Access Driveway Worst WB RT Movement LOS NA B Delay' 12.6 sec/veh Garden Ave./South Access Driveway Worst WB LT-TH-RT EB LT Movement } LOS A B Delay' 9.9 sec/veh 10.4 sec/veh Garden Ave./North Access Driveway Worst WB LT-TH-RT EB LT Movement LOS B A Delay' 10.9 sec/veh 9.6 sec/veh ' Delay is average control delay. As shown in table 4, during the p.m. peak hour, all of the intersections analyzed operate at LOS C or better with or without Boeing Lot 3B, with Southport and Stoneway. Overall, the results of the LOS analysis show that the redistribution of traffic from the existing Lot 6 to the proposed Lot 3B has little or no effect on the operations at all of the study intersections during the a.m., afternoon, and p.m. peak hours. 1 I R:199165-60\LOT3B.doc cpt/jjh 10/25/99 8 ! I QUEUING ANALYSIS Per the City of Renton's request, a queuing analysis was conducted at the intersections of Lake Washington Blvd./Garden Avenue/Park Drive and Park Avenue/North 10th Street to determine the effect of the proposed project on left-turn lane storage. Based on the existing channelization at these intersections, the existing eastbound left- turn pocket on Park Drive at Lake Washington Blvd./Garden Avenue is approximately 375 feet in length. Proposed mitigation at this intersection for the Southport development would keep this left-turn pocket at 375 feet, and would also convert the existing through lane into a second eastbound left-turn lane. The existing southbound left-turn pocket on Park Avenue at North 10th Street is approximately 100 feet in length. Table 5 summarizes the left-turn lane queuing analysis with and without Boeing Lot 3B. Table 5 Left-Turn Queuing Analysis Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Year 2000 Year 2000 with Lot 6 with Lot 3B 95th Percentile 95th Percentile Queue Length Queue Length Time Period (feet) (feet) Lake Washington Blvd./Park Drive/Garden Avenue Eastbound Left-Turn (Available Storage =375 feet) A.M. Peak Hour 300 300 Afternoon Peak Hour 225 225 P.M. Peak Hour 275 275 Park Avenue/North 10th Street Southbound Left-Turn (Available Storage= 100 feet) A.M. Peak Hour 25 50 Afternoon Peak Hour 25 100 P.M. Peak Hour 25 25 As shown in table 5, none of the calculated 95th percentile queue lengths exceed the available storage with or without the proposed Boeing Lot 3B project. Detailed queue calculation sheets are included in Appendix F. R:\99165-60\LOT3B.doc cpf/jjh 10/25/99 9 APPENDIX A Existing and Proposed Site Plans •kt• ".1.,,,,,,...1•4,4;".-.:kg'';',.'"... ,,k, - -„.:14,ri-,,,4,,L ... .W4i"-',4,,tr'.:''.*,.7,, ''.."-..4`'.ii.W.,•,$'-•..-,-•••• -;9.`",-04:-,/ ,•Kt, ,,. i,..ef..,,.,, '',•,-..t •:',U ., '' ',;.1 1.4 ti , ;,..,„..,....;. - , ,:t 4.,,ki ,t„, , --.1... "--,!,--.p.v.,--;--.3:4.c.,., . ••4-,;-'4,- "•.'':,'A AiA‘,'..1);;I'•'-‘,.''''!.'f,..';',,„iY:‘,•:,.4.,',%/,f'i.A,,,,11,04:4 ;: '•;1. .-17... '"- . • ''''"' '-.1..):i•-'-':-.L-P,,e'r-f-..„,.. "•:-..:14,, 3:,..•t' '-`5`,,,,;',if.-',.',„1";;;;- .'• •••-.'••_.-14,!,,,,,;..,. t,12,-,,,,,....,,-...,:., ik.,,,,,,st,..,..;..,-,5,,,,,,,,,,,1„tv.„.1,,*.•,45.i..:04,71.,,,,I,",,,...c.,,,,t,„,..,-.; lib* . ',..,.,,y.-.•7,<,...t.,:, t,, -4s•Ili,-.i'. o-, ,7",, ,At•'s„-,S;ite.,.•.'. ,' 41'14'4'i 4;, fk,-• - ,,,- ilifer,,,,o-,:,,,=:',Vi ',11.'" .1•44'101,"`', •:.',.`;.'", , 1 , ..'''''.•-'..•';•;‘,',..'..• '".:', '... ..."1'.i,.14t,-4.;,.';;,, -N.:.4"....‘.4. A.,,e',„-.4.1,„;,e,,,•';,:rra......-,1,...,- ..7,-,•;.-t..,, ... ..,...,,,,,,tAl- ..„..1,,,,„. 1-....,,..,,,,E,.„,.....„,.. . ,,,,,,,,,,,,w-, ..r.,,,,..,. ik..,:,•,,, ,,,..,,..44,,,,-,,,,,,--,,::,,a,,...,,,...„..,,,,,....o..,,,,, .. - --,.....,,a;•-•-',:: ''-..7,',-,-;‘,...-•TpIe ',,..-..4-,, -,•..4.1. --,,,,,„,,i; •.:,,;-4„'!,,•.;-i;ts:v. .. , .1,0t4;10.44,.., ..k?,.f.”,...s.i.-&••..4-=:.',,,:#,... -, ' 4of,'-:,` ' Y'''•''''' I'''-'-'• -.•: ''''Wc.,:cNii•,-.`4`,',;;,t34(),',',4-.%.U.'''r.i. . • ....--„*.• - • '. -.,170.'t :IrprIV,..+.":, ,, .74,if:''... .` ::.'0,04:-.VX...,Z1(-.!•--.• -.k',.....,--f 1, -.-.-..--1--,......, •• --...„ -ii 145;4,Itt.::---;...---,--tl'-'1.".4- :,7 ./ 4.1!,.•„: _ . tp,...r, ,-A ., „*.s.,.• •-......•,!•.N vt-34 i,1,,-,.•,-4.,,,,;.•?..• •-•,,•, -...-;if 1..4.1.6A1' /''..".' 'I'Lli, .4,4;."4"4-4,°*ttit2',1*<,,,.,,,t,„/1,,•,,,c„,,f A..4.1 •,. , '.., '..' ,4t:.,....,.."1•%'•.y••',,,;,,e-..:•.-,..c..,1:-'!.,,,..•:,',-*-,./-:",:,.. -,s„,.,„ -,-"-----.,,, ,,, '‘,. ,.-TIP.gc21•17,ti..."-•:,:-''''..‘•''.%,:7f1:::,111`).4;g4-4:::1 '''. -' .-/ -."'..fze,titM.:.'7'„S-$.70.X.',!1';.,:-..'., ‘,...:•-41„ --,„:,,,,%tT.1".'-'. •:, -,,, -.v4.. .,.,-7,-- ;.,7,,-,,,..,, .;'4"•-•;',.,„• ;434.;„:.4,1•;.T.,;...,f.„1., _ .„, . • "‘01,":0,,f,', ..,..1, .....;',-;::::'Pg4,-4141 .&.' ',ii';'-'4';',' e,4i,'_.'-:,'...*1 --C," • • , ' -73; ',-,AP-6'',....'174,,.1VV1'4,0:14*',:0%,-,k,-,:%, :.."::-4 ', ,,',, '1 •vP:61Ni, r-• . ' .N,' 0 . . . ip ,•..„t 4, ,4,, ,'6, ..„IS ' .. Po'''V'''', 44:.:VV7,e9.4A:','444,.'..315 ti'-'' 4.').‘'' ': V.:M..1 ,,.'• 4,,,,O4Vr;15 -I ' , -, /.....,..: ' ....... .„,- ,.. .11;,,': ci'l :;,,I7.‘ `t '.z,. '''7:' ,• , ,",' \'''. 'r '..e'-:W£*- 'i'.4 i'.'` '17:',17:0"•••frill**''''"ti,7:,:74„*;; ,,t'' .; .-•''.7., ..„,-:''*** ,'' sZ%' '''' .,,,„0V4,,,,1.5 4','..",•.' •-',:...'.',";',::".... ..c**74.i'-' ","t...4.,i-a.'' •,,:11,i,, :-, pi,CC C;A'y' • _.., .: ,,. co s z.aattx... '.' . 14...;;;:iY,i.%-&-,riliAar,,,,;7".i.gilliii1,! !;;,:•:,'',Nv'7..,..'-',Aii%4';.,Tit- ' ,. ,...4S-1.1.5itr.,5=4- ' "ilsit'4,1,.i'''',12t.,:v&*".- ri~. 1--9-'''../0,;1"; If'..•-II- 1 c.,, .•• .• . ''''' '''. ....S/P- -. • i-`.0.,!..:?0,:'' ..''4 a. ' '' ?4,0,..14.'N;, 1,':"O'`r,,,,L,e-,,',',:;,.:,,k 0,',;„i•-1 ,It" tAitt'44rj • '.- .gi .. ,,5,,,T,t.:F.c.,,,‘.•k. g‘: tl.-2', ',I,,t 71‘;'' X<, ''.4:0.4.-fri, ./ -' '.,',-,1 A t'•-sr-sti.V".t.,,..A. ..- .` 'i.•*-!;,4 4''t4nt'f4-131,‘,14•44.- -e'''••• 4'•'''' ' '''','•' . N * sk-- ' '4-4:4!4*1•;';'-'' Fr "--4NrktlkiLeird-,00-•-Tiyft::V VAlik4t,N,:.'44 ' •V.,44 4 . :‘".'7'.... / / ,'''' •4. \,.., :' 2,13.4;i5b0k / - ...?,4",...A.,?, A-...-,-_,A.7,-.....-..z.:,'-f--:%.,1,40,Atimoi,1:-:-..ig, ,-- A•,_,.. . ,',.:1''.. i' 6",24.- ', - 7.'..**if...,..•," ' - -ltt',,g2AWI:.i....,7,-:.1%44..714‘-',.,;',LY 00•''',..,:i, ttrIlk,,,4‘.,-.-'- .;,, ' '-'.; ".' ,- - ,c.- ‘ *........-y',,,,xit . • , , 1..,. ..,". . • .:AZ-v;#0,,i'ill-.1 ,-;: . - .'. .., .:,-. .41'...._,4 N. ',;., . .-..= • sv„,..„,,'-,,!4''..,;,',,,F1-600-*,:‘,....A1.1-$.4 4.A.,--4:".1...tN,' ,-.....0* .:,..\.'- . • -• .''. ,\„ 14'4,41-Vv.,,: ' , • ''.....',8,.:•,'‘.1.1., ..,..-e—nrer,AN'''..•fV,41-i'f.1;00.•41,- ,-1...kv,- • , ,,./ ., ' ,•-.44-;•i.',:qt‘:, - 4:••10.'. r: '.'`'''.4:'41' ''711i.54/A14:4.,l'Art;*•;;IeStfle:VtaS.5-',..''','''',v-i-- - .•• ' ' . - •••?:-. if.14,C....s" , •••, -:'A ;,,.14".", ,4igC4.1.-•?• '` ,v,..,.'"'',:‘,014,r,i,,,lz;?• „ k.2. .. . . , fo!..g4 s'A... - '' y.,-.4,4 i J1., _4, • e ' ,' 4..„,-, ,,..ti • • . .3-4N-''!. 4‘,4, 211,- 4,„1,ry k.Id k-k V,3.'4,,k-=:.:,%'..k.'..•'-';11 ''', kl. , ' .1t 1 • ,g '. '''''AC,•-•'•-•:14".,s'it10,_„,,,,,..'''.04t''i.:• ,';'.. ..;''',-,',:tp." .t..rt ' . . fro-4.1-. -,,,.;It.•••,-, . •' ' - t N,.4,11,...-P' •',"••••A':''.4;,Pc1-• ' Z11:'-':' •v" ' ' , ';#„4: ',,IA',›Itt,14-n*. ;a;-1\`',c;:Otaite2,a4k;',''4", -•:,:t1'1'i..'''''.441,41•\-0 ,.: C,,,'; -,- ' ' ',-fa4:`=.1',.'k''14 k, '*'• ''.",, k, `....11AW„,,,,,'''A,'"4:41,;Iri i''''..'.‘'-11,`,kArr:-'1S.Z.4-,,,412444-7‘Xi.‘2,40'4'.',' V,k'''-ci X ' '`' ' . '"A kr •' `` ' . '.4.1,.‘7,4:;111`1",* ''',',/,'''',,•' 'f:',,=.10,41:05,,,,, IgX,0 .;,,:*-.'t1.•L..:.`'.',''--',-7:.'-i,,.„...' .' .'''." ':'.,::4•:.4/(,'.::-.' -'".r1,i1i".•;1,1.1-'1'4--'/4''A'.10,l11?c=,t1,'•L.:....''`,'.4%;''''.7:--':.,,,,..'..,.,..§,r-.---.4..k i1,.-.b,0.',.:0„.v.71*.a1•4•:l:iv.,f-,4,f..',::„;4f',4•';.0.;,e':„,,-..‘•.0,-;,::•i-/4g,.,-,"t.,•,'-4.:4 0....e",4:....'.e•--L';•••.•'., v10,-444, .•44 -,,,1,, •-;;;I•r.,k,Xt.;r,,!:.,.It y,1 1k‘- ,.\.I_, _., ,-..,.•,,,:,,',. • .--' it A „. ,_..„00...1,.,,,.44.,,.3 ,, .,4%4,1, ,„r.:11; ','. l',.•• +, . • LIA'j rrtir".:• '''...°04..' .i.41.441-.:-','Po. : .1,., :Aft '''''' '.1flt ''41,t,'A.- `-• -1, ,r,..:,. - -. - LOT „ .,,,,,es, ,..- ,...:,.$,:...--., ',"*4 gir.A41)16"41KO. ;re-'. .10.:',",t,a '17,4, '%':,,-.7kAok,fko ,..;'ke.-.. ,..,.= 4-4•44:4.-„,1.P;t1'''4',,,,' - :.s.',.'.,. ", ,. ,;....,,,,...„t,,,,, ,,,,,01,,,,,,...k....0.,- ,. ,, - „co.:_.:,,:,,,.,„se, ,, . ,. ,,,,f , :„.„ze,v,...:;,....„1 i, t 3...,,,,, •:.,„• ,:,,,,-, . , 'Irit.t":&--,- ,,-• 4.441\L'i:T)`"%I.,y,F4,1-l''. i: l'-'' '.A`.4'..,V--,",„' -4;€4,•: • ,,.1.1rolo'., W f.....1. -• 4,452-'_Wi'..-L4,•:,. --'?""' •4.1,...-.!A:f1,,, ,:,:".t.t.7.,„.; t!., ', --..- -,...",,,m54311„eg3 (s), -.4%-::::-4A,..,?-twv,: Azi - ., •... f.1:::=AuTh4p,t.,--.L.,....„.....,"'"-- , Ift,;1:„.,l-..tit",..1‘;e,„‘_tt,:-,...o.,-,,i,,v, !3;70- V Y.174::',%- , .,,, ,-.L.11,3 -,-; Ito*,.,:i,7,-•,c,-.,i-.;,-,,:'. ' .- \ et. ,: ','4'tipt ':`,....k0-1-.-',`'...•:4,4,.,1 .;1 4 -;,$!•'; .,,.., ,...11.41,:•,4•'-,.7.:4.-;V,4,,. • .):',II',:.,,.....''',1-;,,,,,. — '',.$-•,4t,N..,.- ,,,,.. •"- 4"-v• Iii.!'rv.,‘,A.:.•':',"i-k.;,...%-,i-$...4,-..4.5::•:.!:1;:it.F.1.-4,-,7`2;4;,.. \ f''''''''''-''..-1 -: ''''' ''''-';4,.....-"-%(57,--ei - ,,4,4Z-q,-A=4•-,•''.:.1-. i'4.1,..-7 -' xi;''..,/,":,--1,,,.i.,•., .,, ,-,,,..,-.;•,,,,,,,,,i'.; •-..,7*,24 *-'-`i7.fli i ....„,....ek4 sm.,* '„-4-ty ;4!trr,,,•,„--,,....1 e 4,..4. J, ..A ..:.,: ,':t ::,i4::: l'i : ,,,2,9: ,..,,.,:Nt-i. , -..,,t%0,. ,.,.,,,6!.•_:4 2,....,litc..•,t,,114 ,t-4, ,,..:, ,,,,,,,,2,,,,,:,t-r'' "P",.71.1.,),...-,,/,.t.:;::',,4,..1','''''f,'.l'; ; '-'1;":%.•;;':i.T...At - e1-4'• •Q,,,i iir ' '' \)-.‘ '',1- '40 - • ' vi;'‘erf• 1.P.0'-''.- 'i4. 4, li„..44-","•e-'44 ' ''.41,\.z.-.W!,:P:::',1,2',- 4),, -',.,'"'i!'':"r- 91117 l', .:',.'•;C: • ''''.'!.it ',- . ' . - ''''..''' ,ti '2 ''';'" °'''." '' 'et* ;i411:41k,..:"taA i.. '''',' ,Y.' 4,,,, , °. \'‘ ‘‘ r..,7' V 11,:',;i;:$:?^.,v' V 1 c r. `, '1,4;.:t.:' -:9',14i , ' 1 • ' . '''',1 1.. :'1-:::,0 ,, '''' * ' '„,,i.-40:,,o, t'4,, ,f*.',17f- ,,''' ',"- 2. '.,%,":4f1:4•,,,-,6'.:';.i. ,, ., , ., . :1, ,,,,L ` - ,-.‘ IA Y •',"-;:v.-..., ,,A LOT -‘:.*'4,--1 •`4.s•,--a- ' . * tf -7 s kr,40.,00''',04 0 ;,1'- .31!,,' .. --,-..., 'It 'Z-.'N.'t, 1,.`.1",•4 -t4;,.,w,to.-oiiii ,, ,,, ,..' 1.-A,''..'. '''V'''''',,".•'''''.*.,;';‘•:1 A',,,',1.1 * -14..ms-J-,74,,,„"4,,, , .A-1,44',,g . . Tillt ... ..,.. ,-....-.,es,-- A,.30 --t : .- - -1.-.1, Lii f. ,.i . 6:w- cN ' .4....-4;-,-.._ "....:'..:r41/40.1.+-1---,'1,-glki.*:-.,.. *,,' ":.• - ,..''1 ,e,,,,'-34;.*:::.,:'4,-',,0 ' .. ',;!:` D f§, t-.1.r. : : , , 1 .,'„ Ai- C -z_ - -' -11.4„,,L.T.-4k,*,, 'if,-*1;1, ..4,4,-.A.,.;', ,..„.-4.Wi ... 'i u•,:',!.•: ;,„,: ,: .:.,, %, 5 '"/„..s, z . : '4'44.. ',. ,,. . ' .. .'„;:' . co - .., - t•-,;•,.-4;ApAyA„-ore.,-..-0,--.--k; A :.-1% -,,,,,1•-,1*(4,...imo.,,,,, ,,,.,iivi..-,,,,,-,,,,....-:,.,.,...:.---2., ,,, ''s•li; 1-1-I lti;,.''' - - 4 _ .,„,. > „.:...., . . . .,..,+.....,,„,..,,,„„7., ,: „,..., IP -i.1.4,i1-%-l'e. .,'"..--4,„".;.-*.c.Use4-,i.z,•',..4,;I ,tFA;: -;. ,, -,, ..._.-4,'.5 < "-'" l''r.t * t• .f';',;-',4.4-P,',",,,,,Ve4y .,-:-1A-,,,:. - 4.:„7,..7,, -'.,v, l'..,z-..; -'le 1.4i.f.kiz-: •('-..i.- -, -,:-=',"V.'.,• '-'!':, ' . • •' ' , tr,,,mr.,,, ,,...-..,-.4.04...,.,0,-, ,.'.. 4,,.... ..--- si; ...:.,, .40-.„47,-....,,,,,,,,t,..„,.....„wild. -V-)+.':.:-., ,•.-„,---,-.- •;:. -,5,..-i, y .' ,," - ___:„..........." .-m.,-yew,-,„,-,,,'„,„,..11,, eyx..7 ,,..# . ,.4,..„. -- ,t.tr:4,.., -,,, -::,-...1:1, ...o.my.,,,),.,..1..;i•w..,..-•t;,•/.. 1,-'.t--4.: ', '.--: • • '- .4, m ,,,,,;.--.------ — ..---ti, -t..4',..t,"751,0',..,,,l,„..''S.Wk,'-'.-r'g.;,0'-.,:3- '1...i 'rZir ::;',:i‘fRi-,r4vpize4it:'e;1-:?: A47it,,;,!.il t 1 .‘:;-_•!, I .,...;,, 1.., ...r.t,_.„-........,04,..i„w„,:„. 4-.% ' -... ..,.- ,--. # -,i4. -1 . ...-- - -ric.,,,4-m,,W,i •-,.•A'1,..--,:;-,, 07;1:,•)-40,,,,i4.,:f,.,,,,;,...-,-,sfy•W;V:;:.:1;3-'7,-,,,vr, -•,:a•;---*•"1'A,,,-,.tsi-,--• -4; .a. i, ' 4'' ' 'e'4!'..1 .« ':: -.' '"'r.1.,..---1;.-,.:4.,T -,•• 1-'14741 „..-- f...,;it,-1--,--;;,:-.,-, -rs,--i:,84.,,,%‘;',.a6, i. '* "•:;-',...... • A'k.' ' ;•.; ,'*." t lititi f, ,,- • •.. ' " ;':`.:1- 7;-; 41:i?i''''.--P,- 2'..k..1%%•• - ' ,,,:•,,-,'-;',.. ' 1i4 ,,,,., ______, L;_,,, . i •,. ,..,i,%.4*,...4k,f;,,ig. ;`,r-,1,,,`k , , $,,,:::?:;.,,,,,I,,,,•,,, *,-,.4 ,.,4c.;. \i ;., ,*' titi..-1174.70A..7-4 ,‘:, p'4.0 '' '-# : .',...;,,,,, „„...*,.....e.,„,,,,„,-,,,1,„ 1 . I,--- ----7-,- --..---,,-- ;,„„,, 1-.4.4,,,,,ex,,vis..It.i-,.. $. r . -- ',,i, ,,1-,p1.,..Y.I.,..i...,-4-It-4-14-, , ' - ',,,. .-4,t--;;."-,,,,v474.A., Nt; '1•'- ,...r,-,i5;,,F;,-..,Tv-1.-e,,,-:::.:!:...,.:-; %. -,... i ,...1'i'.t0..,..,„„.,„14,1-1:,4,:,4.;4,,.1-,-4%-,,,,;,4$.0...*%-.g„,v,,at.,,-.".,i,,,,P t,-',:.e,.I1,-A,,i,,.p0 ix-1,,q it-,--Ii*,,f'.i.2k,i-4,2,1,,,04;(.-,.'..-11„,,".t4.„:vs4,„..t,,..4m.1r,,„..;!p,ya„,,,;rb.t,„,,.,A:.-., W_..k.;I,-,,,-.',AA,tF,k. '''-,.i`•1,,,1%,,.,t‘.11.-„,4„1,,,.q1..-1*,,ZA„,,,.',,,.t;,',-vP;....-,tL::i,1l0.,,-„„&0„1,,,A4.A1.4')...,,t'4:;,,,,;,,,,:,,,,.,,,...,...,,,.,,. 7.4..,.,,, LO T 3A ,,t4,4. t4. , , ,,,kriftsiti.%itilf';‘,;11.,p.:".., 7111:12silic,r,t.'4,,4..,- ,,. ,=. 1,.. . :14 ' • >=PIttglAWAVI.,4: W'''..k" st-i,....-4 filf*:4',• 3'f'Z'ae''''11'="74''''‘*':*%-....;.r.'t'S.0'''. V';'''''''°' ' ' '"'/t7 - ' -- ' • ..:t.C.it-14..r.:1 altsf.Zt '' - ..;`11,44,- -•,,,,,,, , k= • .,. .4-'!.1 -14,4tPs , *4; i..V.,%1A30-''."......14.1, "ilf'. vigal:h.,,,,ii,,iiv-,',:v-,,49„..i5,14107..-z..• ,a,v,‘i,,,t,. ,,,:: .., .t ,:',. k: ' ':"'"'''"41,....',..4.4.:,..r.V.4.41..4. . , .,f`,',. .... ..,,,S ,1,,..', , "', .'1j.' '''''-,./Z , '...r•.t '' .''.:' `‘`. ..r"` - >I h ". ,C, 44,-,'..7 :,:i,,Ak:',=','" •.0:Nt'A'.!•.4.''-...7"•it, -,, - ,-,...„,‘,., .,, .4,-- .: .,.vk. 4.•.- ,,,-.; - .!, , ,- v12. 44,4Y4. ,s.stis..Trak •.-4"- ','.41:3L* 041, .144,111.-_.,.„.,:,,.,-,... ,;•,-,,,..2-,-,t--..• -;.- 1 '‘... 44..,Mtygy-*., ,7$Ir'lreole4",11M ,;1.'' -:: 1.---„4`'-...;',;` -.*d;, -..;4A•-,.;:::::-•,‘4,------, t't• *4,1, * .. , , , ..„wit,r...4,4...-ss 4.31,,,,,,,,,, ,,-4,•,,t,),•••.sest,,,i,se.,s....-#y&4.4)44''''''''''''''''''"'••'-'- -';t•-• "`"'' 4••••, :".', N 8TH STREET 4-01 /4,41'. "":"---- 6- N , t--•--- ,-,3,111*-111,71t: ' iti";71,111:-.1 EXISTING SITE PLAN Zz. " , - ; ..,,..'.,e4,V.,,4„...'•.;:;.t-,444,.."*I.,.1 r;"..p'.timp.:440,,,A-021. '-' ..... !, g :., „,,r• ., 4.2;41";.,...1.7.,,,c-4 ?,..4 ,...:' .,44.1 ••,-,C4*,.. .4•40/.741'W;ts7 .4, .r.....:' ..y..• , , 1..tn,c.,,s, .. re, ,4, 01.111MagintkciTIMWM=M1R4v-114t' *3; 2" 4 '''' ''''''.. '`.. ‘414,-,k, 4'. ''' '* ' --- 1 �..'sd Clive lid I I *� 0O�� a,r 31J5NOirr3rl .�'.�. 0MV./308 _ • ' ..I ,.—� asc Meld OfDC.rtSd .... ..� +stau®+ w •M.. . ... .. w M... . , r 1.. I .., da 3oae rsrr vnt �adrxul+,In/':u .ia a�1 wn,�oe..7.174... to_•rccae - z x1 diva* "d' LZCG 1Nf10D TICS OttlNt3dd irdU315>) ril I (�1 I,t\( \ ',,:\\� \t�/b� / tt 7fl1 `(`(`C \��� U.sir. ,tUCfl4R3dd ll 0 o ts ..,cc ' F4'I�I ' \•e=lirra2C 61[ Osto o — o• — o 0z - i - 110 (l �I Z ��`\\11 \ \ \\ `, vrc OK xsc 1 e o to t a I - \\ �� \ \\ \G 0 o u c o o an t aso.rs�...rws=,tac- , �\`\Q� . mrl •cam { aae 1T�. usv wme twr�oran MOD* iQ I .'` , ♦‘ . \\�\ \V1 0,7 Qu i�r�cv 1ws I U,.a c�vn vrasr� n� I m ce�o 11 _�'t >>�\ \ \ ��'��oq nt�.m US TIC aeute rao, f r a,m ms in aex.a y e.sorn a9t3c /11144,k) \ 9NI 1 rvd Maw 'JW1f1d tJI1fLS77O ata3J31 I-r Q —I IVO f • \\ 1 , \l' r I� � m 100 \ :115)1ns,i!, -,.., \c\\ - - `_�. �- v r-�'�' 'i-�l—='�1—'."=1'-1'7T"c'-f-'7�f'`y t 1=I'"'(=,�i`T T�. -ITT"'tYg H A. `, A.• \ \ 0 --_� __ --- ----=` 3f1N8AV N88Vd •- _ _ _s. . _ _—=__ 1."" _ ` i'. - �3 �`� - -- .1 '19..Joa _78 D1 9:1 -_laW— E l.— -:i — .. y _ � - r. �< N.7. .� �, VS. I OD F,, :I ,_ . ID 1 -,..�.._'0 Tull)Fri:.;::s _._-t 1 PJ 1 11 11 _ 111 rb 11 1 1 `� ""4 _^.` `��`-•.i• • �\‘ \` = ;�144444�'(II(11!r�b444ti414((( -- - �' arxti`� , �— ..,, \..... ,_ :.„ ii �'s. •,:..:::::....„. ;� t \ •\ ,;k ppll 1 I`II I I 1 ! lll11J I� II u �' 1'`� 11, i ,ram` ��`� � `; \\`\• \ cr) coz ' lll�l�IH�IIIII�1�1Slllllllf�ll�l, s' + 1 �' %`:! • �. \% RQ{{��II I If I I®III + m 1 1 • ! UI((1NV11ii11111111�14444tiMHI (I" s + t 1 �� � • \� 'I aTC I I 1 I !t I I ' 1 1 ` \ _-i` 0 eFf_ _• �\ \ \ft° .. .-� @IS44YIfr'N11111N41114yIIri>'111 A , 1 -- -1- � —�� D II111�141111111i1111111,441f1�11� ' t I I ► , , ' ` + + 11 ' _ �1� \� /TI1 ; • IIII II II - I.1 r :" .i ''''.:.:.'"''''.:,:___.---• Thi11' I Ill Ill g I I + ,�<}• + tl ��/�,= 4. • • r! Jr rrr p. I rrr rrl III s :r'+� - _! w;,0 ," ,1K1S. - `• ►t ,1+It1 t tIL�t1U1t - 1 mil 11 r rr rt r r rrmrrrr rr i ffi r :1 \1 1 1\111\\\ __;: J� - • r +yystl ,a` 011\.1t t, \tt5u `t,;.-,,1 I I IZI 111101ln GI.111Tui1.11.LUJI111,411.11:d 11 r %- ' ! 111 \-0 11+ t 1t\ d r nrlrtrrrrrrm I I. , • + + t F, • ' d'J - t`�� 11.,,„0 ttt,}\( tt\t+ t�1\1L ,\ \1\ tut t1 I tka 1•11C,1U1 , \\\ 111\IILL~1t\tt\ ••t 1/40 'I'J„I W L1.1 1 1.11 711 11 1 1: I \ ...,.:.::•• _ 1,' \tltlty \tltlt115\ \� � 1v1\t11t , 'I ( • �d 1 111ti+" 1\+1U\11N111\`1t1 \1 \1\1 tt - N11. ,\1 111L- 11 III l l r l l I I l 1111 I I U!I I l I I r 11 r l l- �� \1\\1\11 /1,1t+.- 11,1t_ U1\1 \\1 a_ _ t 11,1 1++ ti11t1\1 —u0 2 tt1�1 1t\+111 111--, 1Ti11\t 1\t o I1I II illlrlll�I III�,!lI�1! allli: \\ - - a, ,,1,t+1t�-0 ,t+,t1111,--00 ,,ttl a �1t\k1 ..---„t1t\ 111� " 1 I c1c1„i,r j i I ��� c• 1 ���11111 1tt�`�m`1,t11t 5 �1 n ,t�� ((��11t111 Cl \1 I„ mrnrrl�f�Hf�f l�ff��IN�HIfl�O= g� t t1 �``� ,�, n ,1t .w 4 t t 1 M 99'' - �- _ 1t11 1 ,10- ,";mt` t11ar1� 1 —I Ittll (� t11 a , �! t\1 11t I 11\, o 11L 0\ 1111t� 1111t1 -+,t, , ttl�`tti\1t 11W 1W W11U1l1l41111Li�.;�--11- • - �t a 11 11111 1A t�`- `` t1- Ij ' C3 a .N" atn�\t+ .\t��I' _ = I 1 t+1�' 11+ttt ,,1t 1(tt115t1t It11t�U 11++ 1t �tlttlt ( r`'tNt1t\ ►11+11}.\\1\�j 11t d� `- 1 tltt tt11\ 11\t1 ,N\11t- 1 1 Lt s��r ..c11\V.ctC11111t+1 ..,,llt�tnll+lt �,.clNt�tTi111111 ..,tllltfit,t\t ..c1t 1U ..ctltt�t�\tl ..t,tlt '� ZI 116. APPENDIX B Year 2000 Total Traffic Volumes With and Without Lot 3B , ihilikSHEET NO. ( OF ENTIRANCO cap JOB NO. 1 - q'61 1 (o . - 60 PROJECT 17Oe I N G L-UT j CALCULATIONS FOR 2000 VOL-UM-ES -AM pEAK lou.R MADE BY AVW DATE 1011GIIa`1 CHECKED BY rl°r DATE /0 O/ 5 GEIJE CDUL oN1 P RV.. ►r TzANCE 1 XX=2UOD v IJa i-J�YUM AES WITH So[ TweDI � �a t NI �IV (v STD ) ND LOT (o (.. (X)) :2000 VowmEs W1TN SourHpoKFI 3-2' s! L-, S-tt JEWAY, AtJD LOT 36 a I�, I jr ', S 1 41 lk \I 11, 0 0 � , 44 \Co) MOM) (?JAI) (5 , 5oo ,f (am) Zoq)zo2 8 Il II 2(6) (o)4 3o 1 I 4- i� `I 2N) cOCo')(o k. It `0� — N 10 IsrREEr ,+1, I(2) 1 3 1 AL b 1 (o_) 6q) 1q — l A Pt �1 1 O (o ' 02) 'I 2 17 wb (, of -4vl" q)CO Co> r (0075) (¢) ((4) '� y O et A c�� Co> cr 4 Col l�T b) 3 C (o) LO hi' rf LoT 38 4 . _ 2 C.w>col 11 a w j- a .'a 02-41 z (o)(1)(o) k_ S (o) D Io 2 0 fA I2�I 4-005) 4j 4A cs 1 (0)) ——— (3)o __ 1 - ? �' o)0._� � 4 4 2 _-, 1- o) LOT 3A 5)3 (3)�q)(.0) C5%)(9V)b94) C� b C2- C3) (Z k_-o (4) (2)( ) z) �.Ze (2q 0 0 0 0 56 9� 19� �38 C3) � ) 4 9 CZ � ( 1 C)C ) �q C U 111 �3s C s) eJ 1 �Ro(in) I --41 C42� g 2 o —I CI (—i N Bl 4 1 4 -14(13 3$(35) 4J + (-► �S,r" 1 c�) 41 4 4. r'g C�) (o) I _.9" _ s R�l 3 '�' (-� (3) o�'� t (i (►off 15--� 9 4 � '� (� (> 4 --� 20 136 21- (3b) 40--s- 2 0 3,-1 NO 103 —� 41 I I� g) — 5 0 1 ti-, 0`') 6 --a (Zi)(�3) 0- )C') Imo-- (2) (Z) (32) (o) 0 "� (�) (Z) Cn')I V (5)(ol 6) _, 2 Q i 111100. SHEET NO. ( OF E N TIR AN C O JOB NO. ! -aq I & ram- 6 0 PROJECT ! (2Oe1NG 1-/T CALCULATIONS FOR 2-b(J0 VOLUMS- AFT-E>2NOD0 PEA oDug MADE BY AVW DATE (01101g1 CHECKED BY Orr: DATE �0 g I GEIJE- COO W1J PM- EI.11-1zAt Ac.2D00 IVows wrn( sour}-(paw "P tIPrti N StoNG Aye P c' LD--- (o ��ti'k • j45 600—2C0D VOW M 1✓S \/�I 1TH SOUrHPO'1-5 , 2 4� >4.1 sIMI, -wAY, D 1-c 3s Ns 0 jr � �,� (Z����e�09, nt �4,0 by ° o (-_ ,�q�iC(�, 20 35 3ti� R./ ci"I 4i 4. (3b4> 630 3 0 V►�� (off 42 2 Co) C2� 3 5 AV' (I o34) ,53 Mo, (3�) 48 ID32 (b'') (0)3 (°) /,13 13�l3)) o�(aql(° R'�vt C°� N lo"MsrKE-r �', III (�) ( o Sz o �2� Co) � +4)1z;- J` 40 ,�� "'1 1 _: Clo3) 116 4 li:,$ C( 29� 1 )(264) (°) r (12)(8(,2) (5) (' 12' 1 0 LLO1 '° } 3 002) (o) R..11- �0,0 QC 14 6 `p LoT 38 1\ to 23`, II - aC Il OILSI (55)2 J � �► o)O_--r, 2 231 2 7 13 fb LOT 3/t, 1 4 (q)(4I 4) to) (2) (Iu3o)(6i- �45� (�� (I3)(�5)(55) 'C._6 CI) (9°) (-1)(�4) k--14b (I2q) $3 ki-� (o)C�) C°) 3 �0� 2 102I1I1o5 �I� (Iz) 0 O 10 *-124(3b)I°B I II 4-01(q-� 14 3 125 *4-131(131- -- N®TM 1i 1 4'!c-ID b(gq---) 4J 4 y ' c-2�3cq$)� 4 ,�-- 0 (0) 4i 4 bp •�-,/ (`I) _ , ) 55 I cr. (3) 0 i' t r (itt 103 2' ,p (°) I -- 4) t 614) 44 --p 11 -25 5Z (1'6)189--� I I I O 151 (2g2)23Q—I. 1 (2qe� 1�3 -i 140 0 6 ( > -3-1 (II)(17-"") ( z) (33) 33-4, (11) (3)(I48) (I) 171 (I)(o) (r,L+) 61 I4t(0\(C,") � ' 2 lu 0 1 I SHEET NO. / OF / E N T R A N C O JOB NO. 1 - q q I ( 5- 6 0 PROJECT TOEING LaT ) CALCULATIONS FOR 2000 VOWMES — PM P EAkK-NoL4sa MADE BY I AVw DATE (011611g1 CHECKED BY Chr' DATE fo(ZohS GEtJe- COOL-on) T 1 - Et.rrzA►.ICE XX=2-000 VOLUMES WITH SoLITHPORTj 4,9, , (� I V STpNEWgy) AND LUT , �/� 6CX)= 200D VODUM'S W t-n-1 SoOTN PORT, Nit �� s� S1DtJGWAV) ROD LOT 38 aI I b2� a •} _. ,2,41 ,Th, y 4l4' . (b4-) R. 4 3%C 41 111, �32�) b4 (.� (o) (3)C24)(15) ( Zu'p 372(2gq) 9 23 924 4 (400) 3 )4 o �{ 12(1; (b)(2)(O 4. (°) H I O 5`rKE el-- �o 1 (5) 0 3 1 4(off (12S)I, ►25 ,,i Z �\J' R ` 0 (12) IZ ---0- 1 2.) 13 vet CO (4�) D f g 613 o I (0) (o 4)(04 (it (t14 ) (I) 00) 33 0 cl- 02) (o) �Y(- l et A Ir I Is(A til N hi1 _ � it21 'LoT 38 4 Pt l 11) 3 4 Z > Col o[ a_ (0o (43)O 4_-- 3 (0 0 (1,0� It) t (P. 1 (` ' LOT3A °)off 525• I 4t, ) 0 / 4 I 5)(Z 5D)Co) � )( -4VO4- (qi (i (a) (`I)(n) (II) k0 (2-) ( )(D)( 11-11(g0 (o)(„)(,) 1 (o) 4__''914 14 ,___ y Cz) oII of I0 A—34 (23) 5 - 0 to (,2 (c,Z) 2 124 At---34 06) 5TRE1 t l 31 C21) M 4 43 Cam) 4) 4 to ",�'0 co) di 4 (4, .L-0 0 51) 51 ,. I (i' CO o 3'A t f(1g2)1g5 , - ° I -- '' #) 1 r (4-z) 42 -w. 3 qol 13 (64)(og —s II 0 220 (82)-31.—). I 1 1 030 lob -4- 32 o o (lo) 3a -(Viol) (I3l C-4) 3 (11) (3)(223) (°) 0 (d)Co)(o) (4) 3 Z 32)(0)(°) APPENDIX C Channelization With and Without Lot 3B iNTRANCOlio, SHEET NO. OF I PROJECT 1 -wok L i- - 313 CALCULATIONS FOR �^�-I%�a'�d^ L.4 Lo�- 6 L6 ASELuA'E) ! MADE BY c-" DATE I3f2•4I1 J . CHECKED BY DATE GENE COuwN PARK _ t NENTRANCE 2_000 W,TIII Boeusx W-j- Co j C4- ANtie-I-1- AT►oN- NETw02k (VITHOUTHPcJP.TPLAIJA MInGAnoN) � � _ ellIllilk*16Q N I oT'*s-r 44 EP 4L° 'zi' %' ! ' 't+ 1 ttv -- t' er I r 1 - VP ; O W lv. -. d 2 2 H o ( , )c 11_0-11—Tiii, 2 i ► ' i 411/1 iLe7 BAl N $1-'1.STQ�� iiiii SHEET NO. I OF ) ENTRAN CO JOB NO. I - ci Li 6 s-_( O PROJECT �00'N� L4 3B CALCULATIONS FOR _ � 1 x'1j Lot. MADE BY Gv.� �9ii DATE l°I , CHECKED BY DATE GENE COUwN BARK ! t N , ENTRAwce • ZOO(p w IT14 13o EA t.1Ca Lor 3I C1-1ANtilEI-1 AT1oN- NETWORK (WITH S'OUTHPORT PLA►J A M,n GATtoN) looliiii • 1- I 1 4) ., 1WL 4 �Q ' v -1.4 j > o L,o-f 3$ 2 ta 0. z 1 Ler 3A1 N irk STa- ---"r APPENDIX D Distribution of Lot 6 and Lot 3B Trips SHEET NO. / OF RANCO , , ® ENTI 1 (,, 5__- 6 0 PROJECT ROEltJG I-(71 313 CALCULATIONS FOR t oT b EY 1ST IN6 1)151-RI13LitTIoN - piv pee r- 4.401AR MADE BY ' AVW DATE I0ltg(c161 CHECKED BY C,F DATE /U/20A/ GE►Je- coo Lot.) "i�3 N s! ��� by, 9r3 3 �,.� 1.) I to 2 'I g �3�� N 1o�'STKFE;r I-)� `'_�A I 31 6� IN j ' � \� � � GUT I q �,, 3 3 1 C yf 11 (OS lUI A o A N • 3 I i '2- us 2 'LOT 3B1 R a . . ID to . • i Q1 WZ r a oX 2 3 2 1 'S 2 I- I_ ! 4 I� 2' I 1 LOT 3 P. 1- I I I Z ; , . 6 3 I 6 q 2 A--9 Ne i 1L. �- 1 � 3 4 �► �lc � 4 r '`t; ? r 5 I '' '-) t rt. -�° q 3 4 -s z I q I 0 SHEET NO. / OF CD E N T R A N C O JOB NO. 1 -__q_q I 10 61- 6 0' PROJECT ROE I N G I-c7T 013 CALCULATIONS FOR 1-of 6 0(1 111toG DIST(LI13unoN - A-'F-1-E12M VN Fe-K +IoUe- MADE BY AVW DATE IOIl'11g1 CHECKED BY CPP DATE /o/z% GE1Ja COO LoN PARK E►.rilam.IC.E , ii IT vi, !- i -� 35 IC 41 1� 5� 214 1 ! I g 5 3� EIql- N Io"r"srIzEET �r, �} 3 r�2� °> >a� R l os to !b -A► 4 t1* g 'k 3 I S1b awl 15 5 2`I 6,z? -n..71-fr. d d 0 Lore 3 R_,1a" °L Fes, al , ; o 2 LoT 38 R ID 21 II • - i , Z 1 IL P ft- k....g f H 2 la I 4- LOT 3 A --0- 24 2 i t- 12 III �-9-0 ` _3 I NBPA� / 4 - 34 pO _I I► 435 q� 3 I25 �-8 SHEET \� 't rp b -: 1 r° 1 -1P g 3 9 --� : 3 I —► �1 (� 2 -� --, z Z 6 SHEET NO. / OF / cal, E N T R A N C O JOB NO. 1 -aq I t 6 0 PROJECT (HOEING Lt71 3P CALCULATIONS FOR Lvr(0 exISTING DISf12-If3UTroN - PM PG +Iou.Q MADE BY i AVtA/ DATE IOIIgIc` CHECKED BY CPF DATE /0/W`11 i GEtJt; COOL-no PAEkrilzAKK.e. N vt, 1 t s! xG 5 i �P--,C 11 1 0- i to . 11, .41 / Z Z R� to /� ' 5 10 51RE r:i `�6 ,c- 1 1 I- N 4 4 —0- 4 � /* �, 41 b 1 o`d o yr 13 3 1-017 t. .N `fir I' 3 N ii 4 1 ,i1� 2 Lor 3131 At (1' /11 Q • 333 a 1j a � z 19 il �-33 1o1 3n 31 b 3 __ i3 2b I 4_ 2 2 I 2. ,t--1 -1.. 3 I I s 1 r► I -;>, 0 , SHEET NO. / OF ( i Cal E N T R A N C O JOB NO. / - c'G] I (o = 6 O ` -- PROJECT ROE IN G LtI !o CALCULATIONS FOR LOT- 3o Tom! P DISTRI r3UTrotJ - A-M PEA K H D u R MADE BY Aft/ DATE (0IIg1Iq`i CHECKED BY (-Pi- DATE (0/7_o/?7 GEtJE COULo- PmRK a KrTizAte, 3 N i t vN It, -2-9 3 \.►0 9 1- 32 b 4j“ g N tol is tz.EET 3-2 9 �. T (- 4 �33 5 3 , r.4 O LLpr b) 3 2 °L N Sil N , , j _ 2 LoT ? P 2 w Q (09 (N )1 a 3-T ovT 2 5 4) 3to �or3A 2 33 �-9 At._ e 2 3 2 A- 1 � 41- 1-13 w el" l L ♦3 40 1 4 4 t:, - ,c- STR-EET --tP 9 5 -g- 2 2 I ! SHEET NO. ( OF ! . . ® ENTRANCO JOB NO. I - 'q 1 60 PROJECT ROE I N& 1-0T le CALCULATIONS FOR -bf 0 TRIP PI SFR(PU1100 —A-F-1E12NDO1•1 PE---AK ++oU(L MADE BY ' AvW DATE 101 I g i'1 CHECKED BY Cpf DATE to/a/77 ce.w; Coot.-oN PM- oKrrizA?.r..E 3 N p. � � , ��xs 1^ 1 - i F 3 Io-7- 11-�,f (al- b3 ‘o reu /, N loft"SrKEEI'�� `�. ,-lb it 4. tk I� 4Yt f� 91 � 53 -I. bl 2 39 '4 (� U' 0 l 1 Lor b l 3 cr et 2 Nn W 21 LoT 'B' 1 - . ii) -1 (ds 14 a •1 aI 6,Z3 -ro iA1r 2 3`i I La LOT 3,% 2 I 2 (o �b-4 k_ k-g 't. 3 I� 11 I , 55 g 33 B 2 �—g �-- I t NeTM4J 1 �. c- 4' 2S 4i 4 4 �1, -- �- 1` I(' 3 -) t f+ Z ') r° �, 3 55 _s el (� 13 a I . SHEET NO. ( OF ./ ' le) ENTRANCO JOB NO. / - � I (o bQ PROJECT ROEING L-ar CALCULATIONS FOR LOT 30 1 r UIST2(BLAmO1J - pi✓l p i -+- DUg- f " MADE BY AVW DATE 1011611cf`1 CHECKED BY C✓a" DATE 017014i1 EIJe- COVLON Pk-R.K ENTRAt e, v, ► I t N i 5, �,vN(�c' 5 � �,,(i 'el IL, II I \,,g•, p 6 ,,, 23 i5 N l O�'SrtzE E r `'� 4 4 —, ,t t� O ILor 61 3 cr 2 1 w W z Lor371 2 - _ ID �� , ZS- IN (vgovr eL ill. 1 s 3 Tt-rn L 2 H t2 LOT3/1ih -4/ k__ 2 4 4 II I I .4k- z IS 2 -a-- 2 N81"4.) 4‘ L - b � 9 40 4, (* c- .G- STRE�T 1 ( 1 - ) t 25 _-Is t -;s 3 I -� 3 i I -4, APPENDIX E Level of Service Calculation Sheets I Lake Washington Blvd./Park Drive/Garden Avenue - . Boeing Parking Lot 3B 10/19/99 Lake Washington Blvd/Garden Avenue/Park Drive 15:45:54 MTM lkwprk001.for (1) 2000 AM Peak Hour w/ Lot 6 1 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Display of Intersection Parameters I I I II I Key: VOLUMES -- > I 299 0 I 256 II I I WIDTHS 112.0 I 0.0 124.0 II I v LANES 1it 1 I O 1 I 2 II \ 831 12.0 1 / I \ / I \ -- 1062 24.0 2 I 1 500 24.0 2 / + / 0 0.0 0 North 202 2i4.0 2 -- I \ I / 4 '0.0 0 II I I ' I I 1 I 0 I 44 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 73 I II 12.0 I 0.0 36.0 I PERMSV NNNN I II 1 I 0 I 3 I OVERLP YYYY III II I I I LEADLAG LG LD I, ' I . i 1 I f clay Boeing Parking Lot 3B 10/19/99 Lake Washington Blvd/Garden Avenue/Park Drive 15:45:46 MTM lkwprk00.for (1) 2000 AM Peak Hour w/ Lot 6 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.72 Vehicle Delay 32.9 Level of Service C Sq 73 Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I Phase 4 I LG/** A + * A + A ++++ + * ++++ + ++++ / I \ <+ *> <+ <**** A **** North <+ *> ++++> ++++> + * ++++ ++++ + * v v G/C=0.067 I G/C=0.151 I G/C=0.231 1 G/C=0.402 I G= 8.0" 1 G= 18.1" G= 27.7" G= 48.2" Y+R= 4.0" l Y+R= 4.0" l Y+R= 5.0" l Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=10.0% OFF=28.4% OFF=55.7% C=120 sec G=102.0 sec = 85.0% Y=18.0 sec = 15.0% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% I Lane IWidth/ I g/C I Service Rate' Adj I I HCM I L ' 90% Maxl I Group I Lanes' Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E 'Volume' v/c I Delay I S I Queue I SB Approach 36.7 D+ I RT 112/1 10.342 10.415 I 504 I 664 I 336 10.506 I 26.6 I C+I 329 ftl I LT 124/2 10.271 10.151 I 1 I 504 I 288 10.550 I 48.4 I *D 1205 ftl NB Approach 53.8 D I RT 136/3 10.244 10.067 I 1 I 210 I 68 10.278 I 53.9 l *D I 39 ftl I LT 112/1 10.237 10.067 I 1 I 78 I 2 10.019 I 52.4 I D I 25 ftl WB Approach 30.3 C I RT 112/1 10.637 10.694 11055 11099 I 944 10.859 I 20.9 I C+I 487 ftl I TH 124/2 10.415 10.402 11137 11421 11207 10.849 I 37.7 I *D+1 609 ftl EB Approach 35.0 D+ I TH+RTI 24/2 10.265 10.674 12377 12402 I 245 10.102 I 6.9 I A I 67 ftl I LT 124/2 10.311 10.231 I 1 I 800 I 595 10.744 I 46.6 I *D 1384 ftl , ✓ Of Boeing Parking Lot 3B 10/19/99 Lake Washington Blvd/Garden Avenue/Park Drive 15:47:08 MTM lkwprk00.for (63) 2000 Afternoon Peak Hour w/ Lot 6 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Display of Intersection Parameters I I I II I Key: VOLUMES -- > ' I 364 I 0 I 530 II I I WIDTHS 1 112.0 I 0.0 124.0 III I I v LANES 1 0 I I I II \ 395 12.0 1 / I \ /1\ -- 544 24.0 2 I 283 2'4.0 2 / + I � / 0 0.0 0 North 946 24.0 2 -- I 3 !0.0 0 \ I I I I ./ II 1 1 0 I 427 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 73 I II 12.0 I 0.0 136.0 I PERMSV NNNN I I I 1 I 0 I 3 I OVERLP YYYY ' I II I I I LEADLAG LG LD 1 I , Boeing Parking Lot 3B 10/19/99 , Lake Washington Blvd/Garden Avenue/Park Drive 15:47:00 I MTM lkwprk00.for (63) 2000 Afternoon Peak Hour w/ Lot 6 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.71 Vehicle Delay 35.1 Level of Service D+ Sq 73 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I Phase 4 LG/** A + * A + A • / I \ <+ *> <+ <**** IA **** North <+ *> ++++> +*++> ' ++++ ++++ + * v v G/C=0.170 I G/C=0.235 I G/C=0.150 I G/C=0.295 I G= 20.4" I G= 28.2" I G= 18.0" I G= 35.4" Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 5.0" I Y+R= 5.0" I OFF= 0.0% I OFF=20.3% I OFF=47.1% I OFF=66.3% I C=120 sec G=102.0 sec = 85.0% Y=18.0 sec = 15.0% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% I Lane IWidth/ I g/C I Service Rate' Adj I I HCM I L I90% Maxi I Group I Lanesl Reqd Used ' @C (vph) @E 'Volume' v/c I Delay I S I Queue I SB Approach 41.3 D+ I RT 112/1 10.388 10.418 I 517 ' 676 I 449 10.664 I 30.6 ' C 1435 ftl I LT 124/2 10.319 10.235 I 1 I 823 I 654 10.795 I 48.6 I *D 1417 ftl NB Approach 50.9 D I RT 136/3 10.287 I0.170 I 1 I 715 I 527 10.729 I 51.0 I *D 1243 ftl I LT 112/1 10.236 I0.170 I 1 I 281 I 1 I0.003 I 41.4 I D+I 25 ftl WB Approach 29.1 C I RT 112/1 10.483 10.775 11151 11170 I 608 10.520 I 5.5 I A 1238 ftl I TH 124/2 10.355 10.295 I 472 I 996 I 837 I0.840 I 46.2 I *D 1 512 ftl EB Approach 30.7 C I TH+RTI 24/2 I0.406 10.487 11568 11740 11172 10.674 I 24.5 I C+I 504 ftl I LT 124/2 10.278 10.150 I 1 I 499 I 349 10.671 1 51.6 I *D 1249 ft! Boeing Parking Lot 3B 10/20/99 Lake Washington Blvd/Garden Avenue/Park Drive 11:38:32 MTM lkwprk00.for (125) 2000 PM Peak Hour w/ Lot 6 SIGNAL97/TEAiPAC[Ver 1.00] - Display of Intersection Parameters I I I I I Key: VOLUMES -- > I 326 I 0 I 647 II I 1 WIDTHS 112.0 I 0.0 124.0 II I v LANES 1 II l I O 1I 2 II \ 437 12.0 1 / I / I \ -- 439 24.0 2 1 I 420 24.0 2 / + / 0 0.0 0 North 1 511 24.0 2 - I / 3 0.0 0 \ II I I ' II 1 0 I 308 Phasing: SEQUENCE 73 I II 12.0 I 0.0 136.0 I PERMSV NNNN 1 I 0 I 3 OVERLP YYYY I II I I I LEADLAG LG LD I I • 1 I 1 ' 1 -- 1 1 N `' Boeing Parking Lot 3B 10/20/99 , Lake Washington Blvd/Garden Avenue/Park Drive 11:38:14 MTM lkwprk00.for (125) 2000 PM Peak Hour w/ Lot 6 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.63 Vehicle Delay 34.9 Level of Service C Sq 73 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 Phase 4 LG/** A + * A + ++++ + * ++++ + ++++ / I \ <+ *> <+ <**** IA **** North <+ *> ++++> ++4-+> ' + * ++++ ++++ + * v v G/C=0.146 I G/C=0.295 I G/C=0.192 I G/C=0.217 G= 17.5" I G= 35.4" I G= 23.1" I G= 26.0" Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 5.0" I Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0% I OFF=18.0% I OFF=50.8% I OFF=74.2% C=120 sec G=102.0 sec = 85.0% Y=18.0 sec = 15.0% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% I Lane IWidth/ I g/C I Service Rate' Adj I I HCM I L '90% Max' I Group I Lanes' Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E 'Volume' v/c I Delay I S I Queue I SB Approach 36.3 D+ I RT 112/1 10.379 10.521 I 724 I 832 I 423 I0.508 I 19.3 I B 1340 ftl I LT 124/2 10.351 10.295 I 483 11022 I 840 10.822 I 44.9 I *D+' 497 ftl NB Approach 51.2 D I RT 136/3 10.276 10.146 I 1 I 600 I 411 10.666 I 51.2 I *D 1196 ftl I LT 112/1 10.236 10.146 I 1 I 234 I 1 I0.004 I 43.8 I D+I 25 ftl WB Approach 27.8 C I RT 112/1 10.452 10.733 11074 11106 I 546 10.494 I 7.1 I A 1254 ftl I TH 124/2 10.306 10.217 I 1 I 731 I 549 10.751 I 48.4 I *D 1373 ftl EB Approach 34.2 C I TH+RTI 24/2 10.308 10.451 11380 11593 I 584 10.367 I 21.8 I C+I 271 ftl I LT 124/2 10.295 10.192 I 1 I 652 I 477 10.723 I 49.4 I *D 1325 ftl !. ,/, cfl • Boeing Parking Lot 3B 10/19/99 Lake Washington Blvd/Garden Avenue/Park Drive 15:18:56 MTM lkwprkwp.for (1) 2000 AM Peak Hour w/Lot 3B y, SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Display of Intersection Parameters I I 11 I Key: VOLUMES -- > 299 I 0 I 256 II I I WIDTHS , i 12.0 1 0.0 1 24.0 ii I v LANES 1 0 2 I I II \ 810 12.0 1 / I \ / I \ -- 1083 24.0 2 1 1 500 24.0 2 / + / 0 0.0 0 North 209 24.0 2 -- I / 0 0.0 0 \ II I I I II 1 I 0 I 37 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 73 I II 12.0 I 0.0 36.0 I PERMSV NNNN I I I 1 I 0 I 3 I OVERLP YYYY it I II I I I LEADLAG LG LD I , cifP; Boeing Parking Lot 3B 10/19/99 ; + Lake Washington Blvd/Garden Avenue/Park Drive 15:18:45 MTM lkwprkwp.for (1) 2000 AM Peak Hour w/Lot 3B SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.72 Vehicle Delay 32.5 Level of Service C , Sq 73 Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I Phase 4 LG/** i_ , A + * ^ + ++++ + * ++++ + ++++ / I \ <+ *> <+ <**** 1 I **** North <+ *> ++++> ++-++> 1 + * G/C=0.063 I G/C=0.150 I G/C=0.230 I G/C=0.407 G= 7.6" G= 18.0" G= 27.6" G= 48.8" Y+R= 4.0" ' Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 5.0" I Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF= 9.7% OFF=28.0% OFF=55.2% C=120 sec G=102.0 sec = 85.0% Y=18.0 sec = 15.0% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% Lane Width/ 1 g/C I Service Rate' Adj I I HCM I L 190% Max, Group I Lanes' Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E 'Volume! v/c I Delay I S I Queue I SB Approach 36.8 D+ ' RT 112/1 10.342 10.413 I 500 ' 661 I 336 I0.508 I 26.8 I C+I 331 ftl I LT 124/2 10.271 10.150 I 1 I 500 I 288 10.553 I 48.5 I *D 1205 ftl NB Approach 54.0 D I RT 136/3 10.243 I0.063 I 1 I 198 I 57 10.245 I 54.0 I *D I 33 ftl I LT 112/1 10.237 I0.063 I 1 .I . 73 I 2 I0.020 I 52.8 I D I 25 ftl WB Approach 29.7 C I RT 112/1 10.624 10.695 11057 11101 I 920 10.836 I 19.0 I B 1473 ftl I TH 124/2 I0.420 I0.407 11163 11439 11231 10.855 I 37.7 I *D+I 616 ftl EB Approach 35.0 D+ I TH 124/2 10.265 10.678 12401 12423 ' 249 I0.103 I 6.7 I A I 67 ftl 1 LT 124/2 10.311 I0.230 1 1 1 796 1 595 10.747 1 46.9 I *D 1 384 ftl - ' Boeing Parking Lot 3B 10/19/99 Lake Washington Blvd/Garden Avenue/Park Drive 15:20:10 MTM lkwprkwp.for (63) 2000 Afternoon Peak Hour w/Lot 3B SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Display of Intersection Parameters I I II I Key: VOLUMES -- > til I 364 1 0 I 530 II I I WIDTHS 12.0 1 0.0 1 24.0 II 1 v LANES 1 1 0 12 I I I II \ 340 12.0 1 I1 / I \ / I \ -- 599 24.0 2 I 1 283 24.0 2 / + / 0 0.0 0 North , 1 1053 24.0 2 -- \ I / 0 0.0 0 \ 11 1 1 0 1 320 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 73 I II 12.0 I 0.0 1 36.0 I PERMSV NNNN I II 1 I 0 1 3 1 OVERLP YYYY I II I 1 I LEADLAG LG LD • 1'- 1 ✓ cPF Boeing Parking Lot 3B 10/19/99 Lake Washington Blvd/Garden Avenue/Park Drive 15:20:02 MTM lkwprkwp.for (63) 2000 Afternoon Peak Hour w/Lot 3B SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.71 Vehicle Delay 34.3 Level of Service C Sq 73 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I Phase 4 LG/** A + * A + A ++++ + * ++++ + ++++ / I \ <+ *> <+ <**** A North <+ *> ++++> ++++> + * + * G/C=0.140 I G/C=0.237 I G/C=0.151 G/C=0.322 I G= 16.8" G= 28.4" G= 18.1" G= 38.7" Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 5.0" I Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=17.3% OFF=44.3% OFF=63.6% C=120 sec G=102.0 sec = 85.0% Y=18.0 sec = 15.0% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% I Lane IWidth/ I g/C I Service Rate! Adj I I HCM I L I90% Max' I Group I Lanes' Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E !Volume' v/c I Delay I S I Queue I SB Approach 40.8 D+ I RT 112/1 10.388 10.421 I 523 ' 681 I 449 10.659 I 30.2 ' C ' 433 ftl I LT 124/2 10.319 10.237 I 6 I 830 I 654 10.788 I 48.1 I *D ' 416 ftl NB Approach 51.7 D I RT 136/3 10.274 10.140 I 1 I 577 ' 395 10.663 I 51.7 I *D 1 189 ftl ' LT ' 12/1 10.236 I0.140 I 1 ' 224 ' 1 I0.004 I 44.4 I D+' 25 ftl WB Approach 30.1 C I RT ' 12/1 I0.440 10.774 11148 11168 I 523 10.448 ' 5.0 I A 1205 ftl I TH ' 24/2 10.371 10.322 I 648 11087 I 922 10.848 ' 44.4 I *D+ I 543 ft! EB Approach 29.3 C I TH 124/2 10.431 10.515 ' 1696 11841 11300 I0.706 I 23.4 I C+I 528 ftl I LT 124/2 10.278 10.151 ' 1 I 504 ' 349 10.666 I 51.3 I *D 1 248 ftl 1I Boeing Parking Lot 3B 10/20/99 Lake Washington Blvd/Garden Avenue/Park Drive 11:39:52 MTM lkwprkwp.for (125) 2000 PM Peak Hour w/Lot 3B SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Display of Intersection Parameters I I I I I I Key: VOLUMES -- > I 326 I 0 I 647 II I I WIDTHS 112.0 I 0.0 124.0 II I v LANES I 1 I O 1I 2 11 II \ 426 12.0 1 / I \ / I \ L -- 450 24.0 2 I I 420 24.0 2 / + / 0 0.0 0 North 1 535 24.0 2 -- \ I / 1 0.0 0 \ II 1 I 0 I 284 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 73 I II 12.0 I 0.0 136.0 I PERMSV NNNN I I I 1 I 0 I 3 I OVERLP YYYY 1 I II I I I LEADLAG LG LD 1 � . I 1 Boeing Parking Lot 3B 10/20/99 Lake Washington Blvd/Garden Avenue/Park Drive 11:39:29 MTM lkwprkwp.for (125) 2000 PM Peak Hour w/Lot 3B SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.63 Vehicle Delay 34.6 Level of Service C Sq 73 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I Phase 4 LG/** A + * A + A ++++ + * ++++ + ++++ / I \ <+ *> <+ <**** 1 North <+ *> ++++> ++++> + * ++++ ++++ + * v v ' G/C=0.139 I G/C=0.296 I G/C=0.193 I G/C=0.221 I G= 16.7" G= 35.6" G= 23.2" G= 26.6" Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 5.0" I Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0% I OFF=17.2% I OFF=50.2% I OFF=73.7% C=120 sec G=102.0 sec = 85.0% Y=18.0 sec = 15.0% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% Lane (Width/ 1 g/C I Service Rate' Adj I I HCM ' L 190% Maxi ' Group I Lanes' Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E 'Volume' v/c I Delay I S ' Queue I SB Approach 36.0 D+ I RT 112/1 10.379 10.523 ' 729 ' 836 i 423 I0.506 ' 19.1 I B ' 338 ft' ' LT ' 24/2 10.351 ' 0.296 I 494 ' 1027 ' 840 10.818 ' 44.5 I *D+I 496 ftl • NB Approach 51.3 D I RT 136/3 10.273 10.139 I 1 ' 567 ' 379 10.646 I 51.3 I *D ' 182 ftl I LT ' 12/1 10.236 10.139 ' 1 I 221 I 1 10.004 ' 44.5 ' D+I 25 ftl WB Approach 28.0 C I RT ' 12/1 10.445 10.732 11071 11104 ' 532 10.482 I 7.0 ' A 1248 ftl ' TH ' 24/2 10.308 10.221 ' 1 ' 747 I 562 10.752 ' 48.0 I *D ' 380 ftl EB Approach 33.7 C ' TH+RTI 24/2 10.311 10.456 11409 i 1615 I 609 10.377 I 21.6 I C+I 279 ftl 1 LT 1 24/2 10.295 10.193 1 1 1 656 1 477 10.718 1 49.1 I *D 1 325 ftl Park Avenue/North 10th Street I Boeing Parking Lot 3B 10/20/99 N Park Avenue/N 10th Street (K-9) 13:09:18 MTM prk0100011.for (1) 2000 AM Peak Hour w/ Lot 6 } SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Display of Intersection Parameters I ' I I I I I I Key: VOLUMES -- > ' I 89 11178 11 II I I WIDTHS 1 112.0 124.0 112.0 II I v LANES I 1 II 2 I 1 II \ 2 0.0 0 / I \ /1\ -- 8 12.0 1 19 112.0 1+ / + / 1 0.0 0 North I 10 12.0 1- -- \ I I 12 10.0 0 \ II 18 I 786 I 6 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 67 I II 12.0 124.0 I 0.0 I PERMSV YNYN I II 1 I 2 I 0 I OVERLP YYYY I II I I I LEADLAG LD LG 1 1 1 1 ' , Boeing Parking Lot 3B 10/20/99 N Park Avenue/N 10th Street (K-9) 13:09:03 MTM prk01000.for (1) 2000 AM Peak Hour w/ Lot 6 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.55 Vehicle Delay 18.9 Level of Service B ! ' Sq 67 I Phase 1 ' Phase 2 ' Phase 3 ' Phase 4 I Phase 5 **/LG + + * + + A / I \ +> <+ * +> <+ <**** v A **** ' A A ++++ v North <* <+ + +> <+ + +> ****> ' * + + + + + + **** * + + + + + + v G/C=0.073 I G/C=0.000 I G/C=0.549 I G/C=0.164 I G/C=0.081 I G= 8.8" I G= 0.0" I G= 65.9" I G= 19.7" I G= 9.7" Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 0.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" OFF= 0.0% I OFF=10.6% I OFF=10.6% I OFF=68.9% I OFF=88.6% C=120 sec G=104.0 sec = 86.7% Y=16.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% I Lane (Width/ I g/C I Service Rate' Adj I I HCM I L ' 90% Max' I Group I LanesI Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E 'Volume' v/c I Delay I S I Queue I SB Approach 18.9 B I RT 112/1 10.263 10.747 11155 11182 I 98 10.083 I 4.1 I A I 42 ftl I TH 124/2 10.433 10.549 11828 11943 11295 10.666 I 20.1 I *C+I 492 ftl I LT 112/1 10.000 10.073 I 323 I 369 I 12 10.033 I 9.7 I A I 25 ftl Qom, - 0, 15- 17- NB Approach 16.8 B I TH+RTI 24/2 10.369 10.549 11754 11868 I 921 10.493 I 16.9 I B 1359 ftl I LT 112/1 10.000 10.073 I 195 I 241 I 21 10.087 I 12.2 I *B+ I 25 ftl G20, _ 0-7412 WB Approach 51.6 D ILT+TH+RTI 12/1 10.240 10.081 I 1 I 105 I 16 10.120 I 51.6 I *D I 25 ftl EB Approach 42.9 D+ I TH+RTI 12/1- ' 0.245 10.164 I 1 I 219 I 30 10.122 I 43.0 I *D+ I 46 ftl I LT 112/1+I0.244 10.164 I 1 I 227 I 26 10.103 I 42.8 I D+I 40 ftl , I ' Boeing Parking Lot 3B 10/20/99 N Park Avenue/N 10th Street (K-9) 13:12:05 MTM prk01000.for (63) 2000 Afternoon Peak Hour w/ Lot 6 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Display of Intersection Parameters I I I II I Key: VOLUMES -- > I 78 11038 I 13 II I I WIDTHS 11 12.0 124.0 112.0 II I v LANES I 1 I 2 I 1 II \ 7 0.0 0 / I \ / I \ -- 13 12.0 1 277 12.0 1+ / + / 11 0.0 0 North I 27 12.0 1- -- \ I / 103 0.0 0 \ II 42 I 816 I 8 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 67 I II 12.0 124.0 I 0.0 I PERMSV YNYN I II 1 I 2 I 0 I OVERLP YYYY I II I I I LEADLAG LD LG i Boeing Parking Lot 3B 10/20/99 N Park Avenue/N 10th Street (K-9) 13:11:40 MTM prk01000.for (63) 2000 Afternoon Peak Hour w/ Lot 6 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.70 Vehicle Delay 32.1 Level of Service C Sq 67 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 1 Phase 3 l Phase 4 I Phase 5 I Ili **/LG + + * + + A + + * + + **** / I \ +> <+ * +> <+ <**** 1 v A **** 1 A A ++++ v North <* <+ + +> <+ + +> ****> * + + + + + + **** * + + + + + + v i G/C=0.059 I G/C=0.000 I G/C=0.443 I G/C=0.277 I G/C=0.088 G= 7.1" G= 0.0" G= 53.1" G= 33.3" G= 10.5" Y+R= 4.0" l Y+R= 0.0" l Y+R= 4.0" l Y+R= 4.0" l Y+R= 4.0" I OFF= 0.0% I OFF= 9.2% I OFF= 9.2% I OFF=56.8% I OFF=87.9% C=120 sec G=104.0 sec = 86.7% Y=16.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% I Lane IWidth/ I g/C I Service Rate! Adj I I HCM I L 190% Max' I Group I Lanes! Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E 'Volume' v/c I Delay I S I Queue I SB Approach 30.9 C I RT 112/1 10.263 10.753 11133 11158 I 94 10.081 I 3.9 I A I 40 ftl I TH 124/2 10.432 10.443 11302 11522 11251 10.822 I 33.1 I *C 1598 ftl I LT 112/1 10.001 10.059 I 157 I 203 I 16 10.077 I 18.2 I B I 25 ftl a - 0,V9CS NB Approach 28.1 C I TH+RTI 24/2 10.394 10.443 11313 11534 11070 10.698 I 28.4 I C 1509 ftl I LT 112/1 10.016 10.059 I 116 I 155 I 55 10.333 I 21.8 l *C+1 44 ftl Q` 0,°5 2L WB Approach 52.7 D ILT+TH+RTI 12/1 10.249 10.088 I 1 I 111 I 45 10.324 I 52.7 I *D I 70 ftl EB Approach 41.1 D+ I TH+RTI 12/1- 10.327 10.277 I 152 I 442 I 307 10.681 I 42.8 I *D+1 372 ftl I LT 112/1+10.310 10.277 I 168 I 489 I 291 10.588 I 39.3 I D+I 353 ftl ,' I I Boeing Parking Lot 3B 10/20/99 N Park Avenue/N 10th Street (K-9) 13:14:28 MTM prk01000.for (125) 2000 PM Peak Hour w/ Lot 6 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Display of Intersection Parameters I I I 11 I Key: VOLUMES -- > 23 I 924 I 4 II I I WIDTHS 112.0 124.0 12.0 II I v LANES 1 1 1 II 2 I 1 I I \ 4 0.0 0 / I \ / I \ -- 12 12.0 1 I I 125 12.0 1+ / + / 1 0.0 0 North 1 12 12.0 1- -- \ I / 40 0.0 0 \ II I I I II 18 I 936 I 1 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 67 II 12.0 124.0 I 0.0 I PERMSV YNYN I II 1 I 2 I 0 I OVERLP YYYY I II I I I LEADLAG LD LG i I I I i Boeing Parking Lot 3B 10/20/99 N Park Avenue/N 10th Street (K-9) 13:14:11 MTM prk01000.for (125) 2000 PM Peak Hour w/ Lot 6 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.57 Vehicle Delay 23.0 Level of Service C+ Sq 67 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I Phase 4 I Phase 5 **/LG + + * + + A + + * + + **** / I \ +> <+ * +> <+ <**** v A **** iA A ++++ v North <* <+ + +> <+ + +> ****> I + + + + + + **** * + + + + + + v G/C=0.073 I G/C=0.000 I G/C=0.523 I G/C=0.180 I G/C=0.091 I G= 8.8" I G= 0.0" I G= 62.8" I G= 21.6" I G= 10.9" Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 0.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" OFF= 0.0% I OFF=10.6% I OFF=10.6% I OFF=66.3% I OFF=87.6% C=120 sec G=104.0 sec = 86.7% Y=16.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% I Lane IWidth/ I g/C I Service Rate' Adj I I HCM I L I90% Max' I Group I Lanes' Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E 'Volume' v/c I Delay I S I Queue I ii SB Approach 21.2 C+ I RT 112/1 10.245 10.736 11091 11122 I 29 I0.026 I 4.3 I A I 25 ftl I TH 124/2 10.418 10.523 11645 11781 11170 10.657 I 21.7 I *C+I 482 ftl I LT 112/1 10.000 10.073 I 255 I 300 I 5 I0.017 I 11.6 I B+I 25 ftl a, = o. 0(013 NB Approach 19.6 B I TH+RTI 24/2 10.384 10.523 11696 11833 11030 10.562 I 19.7 I B 1417 ftl I LT 112/1 I0.000 I0.073 I 219 I 266 I 20 I0.075 I 12.3 I *B+I 25 ftl (� 0.2G ?0 WB Approach 51.0 D ILT+TH+RTI 12/1 10.243 I0.091 I 1 I 112 I 24 10.171 I 51.0 I *D I 38 ftl ti EB Approach 44.2 D+ I TH+RTI 12/1- 10.269 10.180 I 1 I 269 I 121 10.413 I 44.5 I *D+ I 166 ftl I LT 112/1+10.264 10.180 I 1 I 298 I 115 10.357 I 43.8 I D+I 158 ftl • Bbeing Parking Lot 3B 10/20/99 N Park Avenue/N 10th Street (K-9) 13:22:32 MTM prk010wp.for (1) 2000 AM Peak Hour w/ Lot 3B SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Display of Intersection Parameters I I II I Key: VOLUMES -- > I 89 11177 I 33 II I I WIDTHS 112.0 124.0 12.0 II I v LANES I 1 I 2 I 1 I I \ 6 0.0 0 / I \ /I \ -- 8 12.0 1 I I 19 12.0 1+ / + / 2 0.0 0 North I 1 10 12.0 1- -- 1 12 0.0 0 \ II \ I I / II 18 I 785 I 4 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 57 I II 12.0 24.0 I 0.0 I PERMSV YNYN I I I 1 I 2 I 0 I OVERLP YYYY I II I I I LEADLAG LD LG J , � I I I - I Boeing Parking Lot 3B 10/20/99 N Park Avenue/N 10th Street (K-9) 13:22:03 MTM prk010wp.for (1) 2000 AM Peak Hour w/ Lot 3B SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.55 Vehicle Delay 19.3 Level of Service B Sq 57 Phase 1 ' Phase 2 ' Phase 3 I Phase 4 I Phase 5 **/LG * + + + + * + + ' A * + + + + * + + **** / I \ <+ + +> <+ * +> <+ <**** iv v A **** I A ++++ I v North <+ <+ + +> ****> + + + **** I + + + + v G/C=0.072 I G/C=0.000 I G/C=0.543 I G/C=0.163 I G/C=0.088 G= 8.7" G= 0.0" G= 65.2" i G= 19.5" G= 10.6" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 0.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I OFF= 0.0% I OFF=10.6% I OFF=10.6% I OFF=68.2% i OFF=87.8% C=120 sec G=104.0 sec = 86.7% Y=16.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% I Lane (Width/ 1 g/C I Service Ratel Adj I I HCM i L 190% Maxi I Group I Lanes' Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E 'Volume' v/c I Delay ' S i Queue I SB Approach 19.2 B i RT i 12/1 10.263 10.739 11142 ' 1171 ' 98 10.084 I 4.4 I A I 43 ftl I TH 124/2 10.432 10.543 11805 11924 11293 10.672 i 20.6 1 *C+1 498 ftl I LT 112/1 10.000 10.072 I 321 I 365 I 36 10.099 I 9.5 I *A I 25 ftl • Qc = 0. 4 211 NB Approach 17.2 B I TH+RTI 24/2 10.369 10.543 ' 1730 11849 I 918 10.496 i 17.3 I B 1362 ft' I LT ' 12/1 10.000 10.072 ' 192 ' 238 ' 21 10.088 I 12.9 ' B+I 25 ftJ 0 c, = 0,200 WB Approach 51.2 D ! � ILT+TH+RTI 12/1 10.243 10.088 ' 1 ' 114 ' 24 10.169 I 51.2 I *D I 36 ftl ES Approach 43.1 D+ ' TH+RTI 12/1- 10.245 10.163 I 1 ' 217 I 30 10.123 I 43.2 I *D+ I 46 ftl I LT 112/1+I0.244 10.163 I 1 ' 225 I 26 10.104 I 43.0 I D+ I 40 ftl eI 1 ' Boeing Parking Lot 3B 10/20/99 N Park Avenue/N 10th Street (K-9) 13:24:42 MTM prk010wp.for (63) 2000 Afternoon Peak Hour w/Lot 3B SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Display of Intersection Parameters I I II I Key: VOLUMES -- > iI 78 11037 I 69 II I 1 WIDTHS 1 12.0 124.0 1 12.0 11 1 v LANES 1 1 1 2 1 1 II \ 65 0.0 0 / I \ / 1 \ -- 13 12.0 1 1 1 - 277 12.0 1+ / + / 20 0.0 0 North 27 12.0 1- -- \ 1 / 103 0.0 0 \ 11 I I I 11 42 1 862 I 5 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 57 1 I1 12.0 124.0 1 0.0 1 PERMSV YNYN 1 1 I1 1 1 2 1 0 1 OVERLP YYYY 1 I1 I I I LEADLAG LD LG I j i I i i I I , I . I Boeing Parking Lot 3B 10/20/99 N Park Avenue/N 10th Street (K-9) 13:24:09 MTM prk0lOwp.for (63) 2000 Afternoon Peak Hour w/Lot 3B SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.78 Vehicle Delay 39.2 Level of Service D+ Sq 57 Phase 1 I Phase 2 l Phase 3 I Phase 4 I Phase 5 **/LG * + + + + * + + A * + + + + * + + **** / I \ *> <+ + +> <+ * +> <+ <**** v v A **** I A ++++ v North <+ <+ + +> ****> I + + + + v G/C=0.054 I G/C=0.000 I G/C=0.403 I G/C=0.253 I G/C=0.157 I j G= 6.4" I G= 0.0" I G= 48.3" I G= 30.3" I G= 18.9" Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 0.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" OFF= 0.0% I OFF= 8.7% I OFF= 8.7% I OFF=52.3% I OFF=80.9% C=120 sec G=104.0 sec = 86.7% Y=16.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% I Lane (Width/ 1 g/C I Service Rate' Adj I I HCM I L I90% Maxi I Group I Lanesl Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E IVolumel v/c I Delay I S I Queue I SB Approach 38.8 D+ I RT 112/1 10.263 10.689 11013 11059 I 94 I0.089 I 6.2 I A I 50 ftl I TH 124/2 10.432 I0.403 11108 11385 11249 I0.902 I 42.1 I *D+I 640 ftl I LT 112/1 I0.036 I0.054 I 109 I 150 I 83 10.525 I 25.9 I *C+I 73 ftI NB Approach Q 1.q 113 34.8 C I TH+RTI 24/2 I0.404 I0.403 11118 11397 11125 I0.805 I 35.2 I D+I 573 ftI I LT 112/1 I0.020 I0.054 I 101 I 144 I 55 10.357 I 26.0 I C+I 51 ftl a, = b. 0161(93 WB Approach 51.5 D ILT+TH+RTI 12/1 10.279 10.157 I 1 I 207 I 141 I0.605 I 51.5 I *D 1202 ftl EB Approach pp 46.0 D I TH+RTI 12/1- 10.327 10.253 I 62 I 398 I 307 10.747 I 48.7 I *D 1 385 ftl I LT 112/1+I0.310 10.253 I 69 I 440 I 291 10.645 I 43.2 I D+I 365 ftl Boeing Parking Lot 3B 10/20/99 N Park Avenue/N 10th Street (K-9) 13:26:54 MTM prk010wp.for (125) 2000 PM Peak Hour w/Lot 3B SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Display of Intersection Parameters I I I I I Key: VOLUMES -- > 23 I 924 I 15 II I I WIDTHS 12.0 124.0 i 12.0 II I v LANES 1 I 2 1 I I II \ 17 0.0 0 / I \ / I \ -- 12 12.0 1 I 125 12.0 1+ / + / 5 0.0 0 North 1 12 12.0 1- -- 40 0.0 0 \ II I I / I II 18 I 945 I 1 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 67 j I II 12.0 24.0 I 0.0 I PERMSV YNYN II 1 I 2 I 0 I OVERLP YYYY I II I I I LEADLAG LD LG 1 1 1 I ' 1 1 ` Boeing Parking Lot 3B 10/20/99 N Park Avenue/N 10th Street (K-9) 13:26:24 MTM prk010wp.for (125) 2000 PM Peak Hour w/Lot 3B SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.59 Vehicle Delay 24.4 Level of Service C+ Sq 67 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I Phase 4 I Phase 5 l **/LG + + * + + A + + * + + **** /I \ +> <+ * +> <+ <**** v A **** I A A ++++ v North <* <+ + +> <+ + +> ** *> * + + + + + + **** * + + + + + + v G/C=0.071 I G/C=0.000 I G/C=0.509 I G/C=0.175 I G/C=0.112 I G= 8.5" G= 0.0" G= 61.0" G= 21.0" G= 13.4" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 0.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" OFF= 0.0% I OFF=10.4% I OFF=10.4% I OFF=64.6% I OFF=85.5% C=120 sec G=104.0 sec = 86.7% Y=16.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% I Lane (Width/ 1 g/C I Service Rate' Adj I I HCM I L 190% Max' Group I Lanes' Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E 'Volume' v/c I Delay I S I Queue ' i I SB Approach 22.5 C+ I RT 112/1 10.245 10.717 11055 11092 I 29 10.027 ' 4.9 I A I 25 ftj I TH 124/2 10.418 10.509 11583 11732 11170 10.676 I 23.1 I *C+I 496 ft! ' I I LT 112/1 10.000 10.071 I 237 I 283 I 19 10.067 I 12.9 I B+I 25 ftl 6G - 0, 2-(0 NB Approach 20.9 C+ I TH+RTI 24/2 10.385 10.509 11632 ' 1782 11039 10.583 I 21.1 1 C+I 433 ftl I LT 112/1 10.000 10.071 I 205 I 253 I 20 10.079 I 13.3 I *B+I 25 ftl QA 0.Z5" WB Approach 49.9 D ILT+TH+RTI 12/1 10.250 10.112 I 1 I 138 I 48 10.289 I 49.9 l *D I 74 ftl EB Approach 44.8 D+ I TH+RTI 12/1- 10.269 10.175 I 1 I 260 I 121 10.425 I 45.1 I *D 1 167 ftl I LT 112/1+I0.264 10.175 I 1 I 289 I 115 10.367 I 44.4 ' D+I 159 ftl l I r Park Avenue/North 8th Street ' Boeing Parking Lot 3B 10/20/99 N Park Avenue/N 8th Street 11:30:06 it MTM prk8thwp.for (1) 2000 AM Peak Hour w/Lot 3B SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Display of Intersection Parameters Key: VOLUMES -- > 1 56 I 988 I 197 II I I WIDTHS I 0.0 124.0 112.0 II I v LANES 1 0 I 2 I 1 II \ 36 12.0 1 / I \ / I \ -- 35 12.0 1 I 1 3 0.0 0 / + / 13 0.0 0 North 1 4 12.0 1 -- \ 1 I 15 0.0 0 \ 11 I I I II 20 1 736 I 27 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 51 I 11 12.0 24.0 I 0.0 I PERMSV YNYN I I1 1 1 2 1 0 I OVERLP NNNN I II I I I LEADLAG LD LD I 1 1 1 1 BoeingParkingLot 3B 10/20/99 N Park Avenue/N 8th Street 11:29:48 MTM prk8thwp.for (1) 2000 AM Peak Hour w/Lot 3B SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.70 Vehicle Delay 31.6 Level of Service C Sq 51 Phase 1 ' Phase 2 ' Phase 3 ' Phase 4 **/** + + + * + + + A + + + * + + + ++++ / I \ +> <+ + *> <+ + +> <**** 1 v v A **** 1 A ++++ v North <* <+ * *> ++++> 1 + * * ++++ * + * * v ' G/C=0.053 i G/C=0.016 I G/C=0.390 I G/C=0.262 I G= 6.3" G= 1.9" G= 46.8" G= 31.5" Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" OFF= 0.0% I OFF=23.2% I OFF=28.1% OFF=70.4% , C=120 sec G= 86.5 sec = 72.1% Y=16.0 sec = 13.3% Ped=17.5 sec = 14.6% Lane IWidth/ I g/C I Service Rate' Adj I I HCM I L '90% Max' I Group I LanesI Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E 'Volume' v/c I Delay I S I Queue I SB Approach 31.2 C I TH+RTI 24/2 10.413 10.439 11314 11541 11187 10.770 I 31.0 I C 1562 ftl I LT 112/1 10.097 10.102 I 233 I 292 I 224 10.767 I 32.3 I *C 1179 ftl • NB Approach 32.0 C I TH+RTI 24/2 10.370 10.390 11037 11334 I 931 10.698 I 32.3 I *C 1487 ftl I LT 112/1 10.005 10.053 I 114 I 157 I 24 10.145 I 22.3 I *C+l 25 ftl WB Approach 33.7 C I RT 112/1 10.247 10.262 I 89 I 379 l 37 10.094 I 33.6 I C I 48 ftl ILT+TH 112/1 10.249 10.262 I 101 I 427 I 49 10.112 I •33.7 I *C I 63 ftl EB Approach 33.7 C ILT+TH+RTI 12/1 10.248 10.262 I 82 I 347 I 37 10.102 I 33.7 I C I 48 ftl Boeing Parking Lot 3B 10/20/99 N Park Avenue/N 8th Street 11:30:58 MTM prk8thwp.for (63) 2000 Afternoon Peak Hour w/ Lot 3B SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Display of Intersection Parameters I I II I Key: VOLUMES -- > 2 11030 I 64 II I I WIDTHS 0.0 124.0 112.0 II I v LANES 0 I 2 1 I II \ 71 12.0 1 / I \ / I \ -- 12 12.0 1 I 55 0.0 0 / + / 97 0.0 0 North 44 12.0 1 -- \ I / 79 0.0 0 \ III 11 I 725 I 52 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 51 I II 12.0 124.0 I 0.0 I PERMSV YNYN I II 1 I 2 I 0 I OVERLP NNNN I II I I I LEADLAG LD LD I • Boeing Parking Lot 3B 10/20/99 N Park Avenue/N 8th Street 11:30:46 MTM prk8thwp.for (63) 2000 Afternoon Peak Hour w/ Lot 3B SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.68 Vehicle Delay 32.8 Level of Service C Sq 51 Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 Phase 4 **/** * + + + * * + A * + + + * * + ++++ / I \ *> <+ + +> <* * +> <++++ I V v A ++++ IA **** v North <+ <+ + +> ****> + + + + **** + + + + v ' G/C=0.058 I G/C=0.000 I G/C=0.426 I G/C=0.270 G= 7.0" G= 0.0" I G= 51.2" G= 32.4" Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 0.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" OFF= 0.0% I OFF=23.7% OFF=23.7% I OFF=69.7% I C=120 sec G= 90.5 sec = 75.4% Y=12.0 sec = 10.0% Ped=17.5 sec = 14.6% Lane Width/ 1 g/C I Service Rate' Adj I ' HCM I L I90% Max' I Group I Lanes' Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E 'Volume' v/c I Delay I S I Queue I SB Approach 33.7 C I TH+RT1 24/2 10.425 10.426 11236 11479 11228 10.830 I 34.7 I *C 1 601 ftl I LT 112/1 10.004 I0.058 I 209 I 265 I 76 10.285 ' 17.6 I *B I 63 ftl NB Approach 26.7 C+ I TH+RTI 24/2 10.354 10.426 11223 11465 I 845 10.577 I 26.8 I C+' 414 ftl I LT 112/1 I0.002 I0.058 I 111 I 153 I 12 I0.074 I 21.4 I C+I 25 ftl WB Approach 39.1 D+ I RT 112/1 10.264 I0.270 I 118 I 408 I 97 10.232 I 34.4 I C 1121 ftl ILT+TH 112/1 10.316 10.270 I 65 I 230 I 149 10.601 I 42.2 I D+I 186 ftl EB Approach 43.7 D+ ILT+TH+RTI 12/1 10.324 I0.270 I 98 I 338 I 234 10.665 I 43.7 I *D+l 290 ftl l Boeing Parking Lot 3B 10/20/99 N Park Avenue/N 8th Street 11:32:04 MTM prk8thwp.for (125) 2000 PM Peak Hour w/Lot 3B SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Display of Intersection Parameters I I I I I Key: VOLUMES -- > 4 I 978 I 14 II I I WIDTHS 0.0 124.0 I 12.0 II I v LANES I 0 I 2 I 1 II \ 12 12.0 1 / I \ / I \ -- 2 12.0 1 I 1 51 0.0 0 / + / 27 0.0 0 North 1 42 12.0 1 -- \ I / 30 0.0 0 \ II I I I II 3 I 901 I 13 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 51 I II 12.0 124.0 I 0.0 I PERMSV YNYN I II 1 I 2 I 0 I OVERLP NNNN I II I I I LEADLAG LD LD a c Boeing Parking Lot 3B 10/20/99 N Park Avenue/N 8th Street 11:31:52 MTM prk8thwp.for (125) 2000 PM Peak Hour w/Lot 3B SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.66 Vehicle Delay 28.6 Level of Service C 1 Sq 51 Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 l Phase 4 **/** * + + + * * + * + + + * * + ++++ /I \ *> <+ + +> <* * +> <++++ v v A ++++ IA **** v North <+ <+ + +> ****> I **** 1 + + + + v G/C=0.065 I G/C=0.000 I G/C=0.454 I G/C=0.236 I G= 7.8" I G= 0.0" I G= 54.5" I G= 28.3" Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 0.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" OFF= 0.0% I OFF=24.4% I OFF=24.4% I OFF=73.1% C=120 sec G= 90.5 sec = 75.4% Y=12.0 sec = 10.0% Ped=17.5 sec = 14.6% I Lane IWidth/ I g/C I Service Rate' Adj I I HCM I L ' 90% Max' I Group I LanesI Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E 'Volume' v/c I Delay I S I Queue I SB Approach 28.7 C I TH+RTI 24/2 10.413 10.454 11367 11574 11169 10.743 I 28.9 I *C 1545 ftl I LT 112/1 I0.000 10.065 I 207 I 257 I 17 10.066 I 15.2 I *B I 25 ftl NB Approach 25.5 C+ I TH+RTI 24/2 10.374 10.454 11379 11587 I 973 10.613 I 25.5 I C+I 451 ftl I LT 112/1 10.000 10.065 I 153 I 201 I 3 I0.015 I 17.7 I B I 25 ftl WB Approach 36.1 D+ I RT 112/1 10.241 10.236 I 1 I 313 I 15 I0.045 I 35.5 I D+' 25 ftl ILT+TH 112/1 10.250 10.236 I 1 I 256 I 36 I0.130 I 36.4 I D+I 50 ftl EB Approach 42 .2 D+ ILT+TH+RTI 12/1 10.295 10.236 I 1 I 316 I 184 10.551 I 42.2 I *D+I 234 ftl Bbeing Parking Lot 3B 10/20/99 N Park Avenue/N 8th Street 11:25:20 MTM prk8th00.for (1) 2000 AM Peak Hour w/ Lot 6 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Display of Intersection Parameters I I I I I Key: VOLUMES -- > 56 I 987 I 198 II I I WIDTHS 0.0 124.0 112.0 II I v LANES 0I 21 111 I I II \ 38 12.0 1 / I \ / I \ -- 35 12.0 1 I I 3 0.0 0 / + / 14 0.0 0 North I 4 12.0 1 -- \ I / 15 0.0 0 \ II 20 I 736 I 27 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 51 I II 12.0 24.0 I 0.0 I PERMSV YNYN I II 1 I 2 I 0 I OVERLP NNNN I II I I I LEADLAG LD LD 1 1 ` Boeing Parking Lot 3B 10/20/99 N Park Avenue/N 8th Street 11:24:28 MTM prk8th00.for (1) 2000 AM Peak Hour w/ Lot 6 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.70 Vehicle Delay 31.7 Level of Service C Sq 51 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I Phase 4 + + + * + + + A + + + * + + + ++++ / I \ +> <+ + *> <+ + +> <**** Iv v A **** I A ++++ v North <* <+ * *> ++++> * + * * ++++ * + * * v G/C=0.053 I G/C=0.016 I G/C=0.390 I G/C=0.262 I G= 6.3" G= 1.9" I G= 46.8" G= 31.5" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I OFF= 0.0% I OFF=23.2% I OFF=28.1% I OFF=70.4% C=120 sec G= 86.5 sec = 72.1% Y=16.0 sec = 13.3% Ped=17.5 sec = 14.6% I Lane (Width/ 1 g/C I Service Rate' Adj I I HCM I L I90% Maxi I Group I Lanes' Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E 'Volume! v/c I Delay I S I Queue I SB Approach 31.2 C I TH+RTI 24/2 10.413 10.439 11314 11541 1 1186 I0.770 I 31.0 I C 1561 ftl I LT 112/1 I0.098 I0.102 I 233 I 292 I 225 10.771 I 32.6 I *C 1 180 ftl NB Approach 32.1 C I TH+RTI 24/2 I0.370 I0.390 11035 11333 I 931 10.698 ' 32.3 I *C 1 488 ftl ' LT 112/1 I0.005 I0.053 I 114 I 157 I 24 10.145 I 22.3 I *C+I 25 ftl WB Approach 33.7 C I RT 112/1 10.248 10.262 I 89 I 379 I 39 10.099 I 33.6 I C I 50 ftl ILT+TH 112/1 10.249 10.262 I 101 I 425 I 50 10.115 I 33.8 I *C I 64 ftl EB Approach 33.7 C ILT+TH+RTI 12/1 10.248 10.262 1 82 1 347 1 37 I0.102 1 33.7 1 C 1 48 ftl Boeing Parking Lot 3B 10/20/99 i N Park Avenue/N 8th Street 11:27:28 MTM prk8th001,.for (63) 2000 Afternoon Peak Hour w/ Lot 6 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Display of Intersection Parameters I I II I Key: VOLUMES -- > 1 2 1 1021 I 65 II I 1 WIDTHS 1 0.0 1 24.0 1 12.0 11 1 v LANES 111 __ 1 0 1 2 1 11 I I \ 8 3 12.0 1 / '1 \ / I \ -- 12 12.0 1 1 1 55 0.0 0 / + / 106 0.0 0 North 1 44 12.0 1 -- \ I / 79 0.0 0 \ II 11 11 I 725 I 52 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 51 I ! 1 12.0 124.0 1 0.0 1 PERMSV YNYN 1 ! 1 1 1 2 1 0 1 OVERLP NNNN 1 I I I I I LEADLAG LD LD I i I i Boeing Parking Lot 3B 10/20/99 N Park Avenue/N 8th Street 11:27:01 MTM prk8th00.for (63) 2000 Afternoon Peak Hour w/ Lot 6 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.68 Vehicle Delay 33.2 Level of Service C Sq 51 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I Phase 4 I **/** * + + + * * + IA * + + + * * + I ++++ / I \ *> <+ + +> <* * +> I <**** IV V A **** IA 1++++ v North <+ <+ + +>I++++> + + + I++++ + + + + I v G/C=0.058 I G/C=0.000 I G/C=0.422 I G/C=0.274 I G= 7.0" I G= 0.0" I G= 50.7" I G= 32.9" Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 0.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" OFF= 0.0% I OFF=23.7% I OFF=23.7% I OFF=69.3% C=120 sec G= 90.5 sec = 75.4% Y=12.0 sec = 10.0% Ped=17.5 sec = 14.6% I Lane IWidth/ I g/C I Service Rate' Adj I I HCM I L ' 90% Max' I Group I Lanes' Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E 'Volume' v/c I Delay I S I Queue I SB Approach 34.0 C I TH+RTI 24/2 10.423 10.422 11216 1465 11217 10.831 I 35.1 I*D+I 600 ftl I LT 112/1 10.005 I0.058 I 205 ' 261 I 77 10.293 I 17.9 I *B I 64 ftl NB Approach 27.1 C+ I TH+RTI 24/2 10.354 10.422 11203 11451 I 845 10.582 I 27.2 I C+I 417 ftl I LT 112/1 I0.002 I0.058 I 111 I 153 I 12 10.074 I 21.6 I C+I 25 ftl WB Approach 39.9 D+ , I RT 112/1 10.269 10.274 I 133 I 415 I 114 10.268 I 34.5 I C 1141 ftl ILT+TH 112/1 10.325 10.274 I 74 I 234 I 161 10.639 I 43.7 I *D+ ' 199 ftl EB Approach 43.6 D+ ILT+TH+RTI 12/1 10.327 10.274 I 107 I 336 I 234 10.669 I 43.6 I D+I 288 ftl ' Boeing Parking Lot 3B 10/20/99 N Park Avenue/N 8th Street 11:28:34 MTM prk8th00.for (125) 2000 PM Peak Hour w/ Lot 6 1 I SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Display of Intersection Parameters I I II I Key: VOLUMES -- > 4 I 974 I 14 II I I WIDTHS 0.0 1 24.0 1 12.0 II I v LANES 0 2 I I II \ 15 12.0 1 / I \ / I \ -- 2 12.0 1 I 51 0.0; 0 / + / 31 0.0 0 North 42 12.0 1 -- \ I / 30 0.0 0 \ I I 1 , II 3 I 901 I 13 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 51 I II 12.0 124.0 I 0.0 I PERMSV YNYN I I 1 I 2 I 0 I OVERLP NNNN II I I LEADLAG LD LD I Boeing Parking Lot 3B 10/20/99 ' N Park Avenue/N 8th Street 11:28:09 MTM prk8th00.for (125) 2000 PM Peak Hour w/ Lot 6 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.65 Vehicle Delay 28.7 Level of Service C Sq 51 I Phase 1 Phase 2 l Phase 3 l Phase 4 **/** * + + + * * + A * + + + * * + ++++ / I \ *> <+ + +> <* * +> <++++ I v v A ++++ IA **** v North <+ <+ + +> ****> + + + + **** + + + + v G/C=0.065 I G/C=0.000 I G/C=0.453 I G/C=0.236 I G= 7.8" G= 0.0" G= 54.4" G= 28.4" Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 0.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" OFF= 0.0% I OFF=24.4% I OFF=24.4% I OFF=73.0% I C=120 sec G= 90.5 sec = 75.4% Y=12.0 sec = 10.0% Ped=17.5 sec = 14.6% I Lane (Width/ 1 g/C I Service Rate' Adj I I HCM I L I90% Maxi I Group I Lanes' Reqd Used ' @C (vph) @E 'Volume' v/c I Delay ' S I Queue I SB Approach 28.7 C I TH+RT' 24/2 10.412 10.453 11364 11572 11165 10.741 I 28.9 I *C 1544 ftl I LT 112/1 I0.000 I0.065 I 207 I 257 ' 17 I0.066 I 15.3 I *B ' 25 ftl NB Approach 25.6 C+ I TH+RTI 24/2 10.374 10.453 11376 11585 I 973 10.614 I 25.6 I C+I 451 ftl ' LT 112/1 I0.000 10.065 I 153 I 201 ' 3 10.015 ' 17.8 I B ' 25 ftl WB Approach 36.2 D+ I RT 112/1 10.242 10.236 ' 1 I 314 ' 19 I0.057 ' 35.5 I D+ l 26 ftl ILT+TH 1 12/1 10.253 10.236 I 1 I247 I41 10.154 I36.6 ID+I 57 ftl , EB Approach 42.2 D+ ILT+TH+RTI 12/1 10.295 10.236 1 1 1 316 1 184 10.551 1 42.2 I *D+I 234 ftl North 8th Street/Garden Avenue (West) BOEING - LOT 3B 10/20/99 N 8TH STREET/GARDEN AVENUE N (WEST) 11:14:27 TJK 8GAW1AM.FOR (1) 2000 W/LOT 6 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Display of Intersection Parameters Key: VOLUMES -- > 0 1 0 1 II 1 I WIDTHS I 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 11 1 v LANES 01 01 011 I I II \ 0 0.0 0 / I \ / I \ -- 90 24.0 2 I 1 0 0.0 0 / + / 38 0.0 0 North 1 40 24.0 2 -- \ I / 179 10.0 0 \ 11 I I I 1 2 1 0 1 34 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 11 1 11 12.0 I 0.0 112.0 I PERMSV NNNN I 11 1 1 0 1 1 1 OVERLP YYYY I II I I I LEADLAG LD LD 1 BOEING - LOT 3B 10/20/99 N 8TH STREET/GARDEN AVENUE N (WEST) 11:14:05 ? TJK 8GAW1AM.FOR (1) 2000 W/LOT 6 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 0 - . Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.17 Vehicle Delay 10.5 Level of Service B+ Sq 11 I Phase 1 l Phase 2 l **/** / 1 ' <**** **** v . North <+ *> ++++> + * ++++ - + * v G/C=0.433 I G/C=0.433 I G= 26.0" G= 26.0" Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" OFF= 0.0% I OFF=50.0% C= 60 sec G= 52.0 sec = 86.7% Y= 8.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% I Lane (Width/ 1 g/C I Service Rate' Adj I I HCM I L 190% Maxi I Group I Lanes' Reqd Used ' @C (vph) @E 'Volume' v/c i Delay I S I Queue I NB Approach 10.0 A I RT 112/1 I0.059 10.433 I 581 I 630 I 47 I0.075 I 10.0 I *B+I 25 ftl ' LT ' 12/1 I0.010 10.433 I 656 ' 705 I 3 I0.004 ' 9.7 I A ' 25 ftl WB Approach 10.5 B+ ILT+TH ' 24/2 I0.107 10.433 11196 ' 1235 ' 225 10.182 ' 10.5 I *B+I 54 ftl EB Approach 10.5 B+ 1 TH+RTI 24/2 10.108 10.433 1 1296 1 1332 1 248 10.186 1 10.5 1 B+' 60 ftl ` BOEING - LOT 3B 10/20/99 N 8TH STREET/GARDEN AVENUE N (WEST) 11:15:41 TJK 8GAW1AF.FOR (1) 2000 W/LOT 6 , SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Display of Intersection Parameters I I I I I Key: VOLUMES -- > 0 I 0 I o I I I WIDTHS 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 II 1 v LANES 0 0 1 0 I 1 II \ 0 0.0 0 I / I \ / I \ -- 124 24.0 2 1 1 0 0.0 0 / + / 273 0.0 0 North I 189 24.0 2 -- \ I / 33 0.0 0 \ I II 11 I 0 I 151 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 11 I I1 12.0 1 0.0 112.0 I PERMSV NNNN I II 1 I 0 1 1 I OVERLP YYYY 1 I1 I 1 I LEADLAG LD LD 1 I i i 1 1 1 BOEING - LOT 3B 10/20/99 N 8TH STREET/GARDEN AVENUE N (WEST) 11:15:22 TJK 8GAW1AF.FOR (1) 2000 W/LOT 6 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 0 - . i ! Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.36 Vehicle Delay 9.5 Level of Service A Sq 11 I Phase 1 ' Phase 2 **/** / I ' <**** **** I v North <+ *> ++++> ' + * ++++ + * v G/C=0.325 I G/C=0.542 I G= 19.5" I G= 32.5" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" OFF= 0.0% I OFF=39.2% C= 60 sec G= 52.0 sec = 86.7% Y= 8.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% I Lane IWidth/ I g/C I Service Rate' Adj I I HCM I L '90% Max' I Group I Lanes' Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E 'Volume' v/c I Delay I S I Queue I NB Approach 15.8 B I RT 112/1 10.161 10.325 I 452 I 514 I 189 10.368 I 16.0 I *B 1108 ftl I LT 112/1 10.021 10.325 I 512 I 575 I 14 10.024 I 13.8 I B+I 25 ftl WB Approach 8.6 A ILT+TH 124/2 10.278 10.542 11356 11372 I 630 10.459 I 8.6 I *A 1122 ftl EB Approach 6.9 A I TH+RTI 24/2 10.114 10.542 11875 11875 I 304 10.162 I 6.9 I A I 59 ftl i ; ` BOEING - LOT 3B 10/20/99 N 8TH STREET/GARDEN AVENUE N (WEST) 11:16:41 TJK 8GAW1PM.FOR (1) 2000 W/LOT 6 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Display of Intersection Parameters Key: VOLUMES -- > 0 I 0 l 0 II 1 1 WIDTHS 0.0 1 0.0 i 0.0 II 1 v LANES 0 1 0 0 II \ 0 0.0 0 • / I \ / I \ -- 34 24.0 2 1 1 II 0 0.0 0 / + / 43 0.0 0 North 1 68 24.0 2 -- \ 1 / 7 0.0 0 \ 11 I 1 I 11 11 I 0 I 226 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 11 1 11 12.0 I 0.0 1 12.0 I PERMSV NNNN I 11 1 1 0 1 1 1 OVERLP YYYY I I1 I 1 I LEADLAG LD LD I 1 ; BOEING - LOT 3B 10/20/99 N 8TH STREET/GARDEN AVENUE N (WEST) 11:16:28 TJK 8GAW1PM.FOR (1) 2000 W/LOT 6 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 0 - . Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.21 Vehicle Delay 10.7 Level of Service B+ Sq 11 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 / I \ <**** **** I v North <+ *> ++++> I + * ++++ + * V G/C=0.468 I G/C=0.398 I G= 28.1" I G= 23.9" Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I OFF= 0.0% I OFF=53.5% C= 60 sec G= 52.0 sec = 86.7% Y= 8.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% I Lane IWidth/ I g/C I Service Ratel Adj I I HCM I L 190% Max' I Group I Lanes' Reqd Used 1 @C (vph) @E 'Volume' v/c I Delay 1 S I Queue I NB Approach 10.2 B+ I RT 112/1 10.196 10.468. I 712 I 756 I 248 10.328 I 10.3 I *B+I 110 ftl I LT 112/1 10.019 10.468 I 803 1 845 1 12 10.014 1 8.5 I A 1 25 ftl • WB Approach 11.3 B+ ILT+TH 124/2 10.057 10.398 1 1054 1 1102 I 97 10.088 1 11.3 l *B+1 25 ftl EB Approach 11.2 B+ 1 TH+RTI 24/2 10.048 10.398 1 1308 1 1351 1 101 10.075 1 11.2 1 B+I 26 ftl ' BOEING - LOT 3B 10/20/99 N 8TH STREET/GARDEN AVENUE N (WEST) 11:17:44 TJK 8GAW2AM.FOR (2) 2000 W/LOT 3B SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Display of Intersection Parameters I I II I Key: VOLUMES -- > 2 I 3 I 2 II I I WIDTHS 0.0 112.0 112.0 II I v LANES I 01 1I 1II I I I II \ 7 0.0 0 / I \ / I \ -- 85 24.0 2 I 1 3 0.0 0 / + / 35 0.0 0 North 1 36 24.0 2 -- \ I / 179 0.0 0 \ II I I II 2 I 2 I 32 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 11 I II 0.0 12.0 112.0 I PERMSV NNNN _, I I I 0 I 1 I 1 I OVERLP YYYY I II I I I LEADLAG LD LD II 1 BOEING - LOT 3B 10/20/99 N 8TH STREET/GARDEN AVENUE N (WEST) 11:17:33 TJK 8GAW2AM.FOR (2) 2000 W/LOT 3B SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 0 - . Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.17 Vehicle Delay 10.5 Level of Service B+ Sq 11 1 Phase 1 I Phase 2 I - **/** * * + A * * + **** / I \ <* * +> <**** v A **** 1A ++++ V North <+ + +> ++++> I + + + ++++ + + + G/C=0.433 I G/C=0.433 I G= 26.0" I G= 26.0" Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I OFF= 0.0% I OFF=50.0% C= 60 sec G= 52.0 sec = 86.7% Y= 8.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% I Lane (Width/ g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L 90% Max I I I I I I I I Group I Lanes' Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E Volume v/c Delay S Queue 'Volume' I I I I SB Approach 9.7 A I TH+RTI 12/1 10.012 10.433 I 711 I 759 I 5 10.007 I 9.7 I *A I 25 ftl I LT 112/1 10.000 10.433 I 558 I 608 I 2 10.003 I 9.6 I A I 25 ftl NB Approach 9.9 A I RT 112/1 10.055 10.433 I 581 I 630 I 44 10.070 I 10.0 I A I 25 ftl ILT+TH 112/1 10.014 10.433 I 663 I 712 I 6 10.008 I 9.7 I A I 25 ftl WB Approach 10.5 B+ ILT+TH+RTI 24/2 10.105 10.433 11204 11243 I 222 10.179 I 10.5 I *B+I 54 ftl EB Approach 10.6 B+ ILT+TH+RTI 24/2 10.113 10.433 11231 11269 I 247 10.195 I 10.6 I B+I 59 ftl BOEING - LOT 3B 10/20/99 N 8TH STREET/GARDEN AVENUE N (WEST) 11:18:50 TJK 8GAW2AF.FOR (2) 2000 W/LOT 3B SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Display of Intersection Parameters I I I II I Key: VOLUMES -- > 1 17 I 75 I 55 II I I WIDTHS 0.0 1 12.0 1 12.0 11 I v LANES 1 1 1 1 II \ 8 0.0 0 / I \ / I \ -- 86 24.0 2 1 1 3 0.0 0 / + / 198 0.0 0 North 1 185 24.0 2 -- \ I 33 0.0 0 \ I1 I 1 I I1 11 1 3 1 148 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 11 1 I1 0.0 1 12.0 1 12.0 1 PERMSV NNNN 1 I1 0 I 1 1 1 1 OVERLP YYYY I I1 I 1 I LEADLAG LD LD I 1 i BOEING - LOT 3B 10/20/99 N 8TH STREET/GARDEN AVENUE N (WEST) 11:18:37 TJK 8GAW2AF.FOR (2) 2000 W/LOT 3B SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 0 - . Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.27 Vehicle Delay 10.5 Level of Service B+ Sq 11 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 - * * + A * * + **** / I \ <* * +> <**** IA **** IA ++++ v North <+ + +> ++++> ' + + + ++++ + + + v G/C=0.378 I G/C=0.489 I G= 22.7" I G= 29.3" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" OFF= 0.0% I OFF=44.4% I C= 60 sec G= 52.0 sec = 86.7% Y= 8.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% I Lane (Width/ 1 g/C I Service Rate' Adj I I HCM I L 190% Maxi I Group I Lanes' Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E IVolumel v/c I Delay I S I Queue I SB Approach 12.4 B+ I TH+RTI 12/1 I0.088 10.378 I 627 I 684 I 102 10.149 I 12.4 I *B+I 54 ftI I LT 112/1 10.000 10.378 I 469 I 525 I 61 10.116 I 12.3 I B+I 32 ftl NB Approach 13.3 B+ I RT 112/1 10.158 10.378 I 542 I 598 ' 185 10.309 I 13.5 I B+I 97 ftl ILT+TH 112/1 I0.027 10.378 I 556 I 612 I 18 I0.029 I 11.8 I B+I 25 ftl WB Approach 9.8 A ILT+TH+RTI 24/2 10.216 10.489 i 1205 11234 I 464 10.376 I 9.8 I *A 1100 ftl EB Approach 8.7 A ILT+TH+RTI24/2 10.119 10.489 1 1592 I 1609 I 302 10.188 1 8.7 1 A 1 65 ftl ' BOEING - LOT 3B 10/20/99 N 8TH STREET/GARDEN AVENUE N (WEST) 11:19:49 1 TJK 8GAW2PM.FOR (2) 2000 W/LOT 3B SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] Display of Intersection Parameters 1 I I II I Key: VOLUMES -- > 1 4 I 11 I 11 II I I WIDTHS 1 0.0 1 12.0 112.0 II I v LANES 0 I 1 I 1 11 1 1 II \ 2 0.0 0 / I \ / 1 \ -- 23 24.0 2 1 1 1 0.0 0 / + / 32 0.0 0 North 1 67 24.0 2 -- \ 1 / 7 0.0 0 \ II I1 11 I 3 1 223 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 11 1 11 0.0 1 12.0 1 12.0 1 PERMSV NNNN II 0 1 1 1 1 OVERLP YYYY 1 I1 I 1 I LEADLAG LD LD i BOEING - LOT 3B 10/20/99 N 8TH STREET/GARDEN AVENUE N (WEST) 11:19:35 TJR 8GAW2PM.FOR (2) 2000 W/LOT 3B SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 0 - . Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.20 Vehicle Delay 10.5 Level of Service B+ Sq 11 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 **/** + + + A + + + **** / I \ <+ + +> <**** 1 vA **** 1 A ++++ v - North <+ + *> ++++> I ' + + * G/C=0.466 G/C=0.400 1 G= 28.0" G= 24.0" Y+R= 4.0" l Y+R= 4.0" 1 OFF= 0.0% OFF=53.3% C= 60 sec G= 52.0 sec = 86.7% Y= 8.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% Lane (Width/ 1 g/C I Service Rate' Adj 1 1 HCM 1 L 190% Maxi 1 Group 1 Lanes' Reqd Used 1 @C (vph) @E IVolumel v/c 1 Delay 1 S 1 Queue 1 _ SB Approach 8.6 A 1 TH+RTI 12/1 10.023 10.466 1 793 1 836 1 16 10.019 1 8.6 1 A 1 25 ftl 1 LT 1 12/1 10.000 10.466 1 604 1 649 1 12 10.018 1 8.6 1 A 1 25 ftl NB Approach 10.2 B+ ,I 1 RT 1 12/1 10.194 10.466 1 709 1 753 1 245 10.325 1 10.3 I *B+1 109 ftl ILT+TH 1 12/1 10.023 10.466 1 760 1 803 1 15 10.019 1 8.6 1 A 1 25 ftl WB Approach 11.1 B+ ILT+TH+RTI 24/2 10.045 10.400 1 1069 1 1117 1 73 10.065 1 11.1 I *B+ 1 25 ftl EB Approach 11.2 B+ ILT+TH+RTI 24/2 10.050 10.400 1 1252 1 1296 1 101 10.078 1 11.2 1 B+1 26 ftl 1 i I ' 1 North 8th Street/Garden Avenue (East) ' BOEING - LOT 3B 10/19/99 N 8TH STREET/GARDEN AVENUE N (EAST) 14:23:51 TIK 8GAE1AM.FOR (1) 2000 W/LOT 6 1 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Display of Intersection Parameters I I I II I Key: VOLUMES -- > I 4 I 9 I 2 I I I WIDTHS 112.0 112.0 I 0.0 II v LANES 1 1 0 1 I I I I \ 28 0.0 0 / I \ / 1 \ -- 41 24.0 2 I 15 0.0 0 / + / 1 0.0 0 North 1 109 24.0 2 -- \ I / 0 0.0 0 \ II I I I II 7 I 2 I 11 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 71 I II 0.0 12.0 112.0 I PERMSV NNNN I II 0 I 1 I 1 I OVERLP YYYY I II I I I LEADLAG LD LD 1 I�, I BOEING - LOT 3B 10/19/99 ' N 8TH STREET/GARDEN AVENUE N (EAST) 14:23:36 TJK 8GAE1AM.FOR (1) 2000 W/LOT 6 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 0 - . Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.13 Vehicle Delay 16.8 Level of Service B Sq 71 I Phase 1 l Phase 2 I Phase 3 **/** + * * A + * * **** / I \ I <+ * *> <**** Iv A **** I I ^ ++++ v North I <* * +> ++++> I I * * + * * + I G/C=0.267 I G/C=0.267 I G/C=0.267 I I G= 16.0" I G= 16.0" I G= 16.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I OFF= 0.0% I OFF=33.3% I OFF=66.7% C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y=12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% I Lane IWidth/ I g/C I Service Rate' Adj I I HCM I L I90% Max' I Group I Lanes' Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E 'Volume' v/c I Delay I S I Queue I SB Approach 16.3 B I RT 112/1 I0.015 10.267 I 364 I 431 I 6 10.014 I 16.2 I B I 25 ftl ILT+TH 112/1 10.023 10.267 I 432 I 502 I 17 10.034 I 16.3 I *B I 25 ftl NB Approach • 16.4 B I RT 112/1 I0.030 10.267 I 344 I 410 I 20 10.049 I 16.4 I B I 25 ftl ILT+TH 112/1 I0.023 10.267 I 397 I 465 I 16 I0.034 I 16.3 I *B I 25 ftl WB Approach 16.7 B ILT+TH+RT' 24/2 I0.052 10.267 I 715 I 791 I 94 10.119 I 16.7 l *B I 30 ftl EB Approach 17.0 B ILT+TH 124/2 10.069 10.267 I 763 I 839 I 146 10.174 1 17.0 I B 1 46 ftl f 6ir BOEING - LOT 3B 10/19/99 N 8TH STREET/GARDEN AVENUE N (EAST) 14:41:04 TJK 8GAE1AF.FOR (1) 2000 W/LOT 6 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Display of Intersection Parameters I I II I Key: VOLUMES -- > 168 I 1 I 11 II I I WIDTHS 12.0 112.0 I 0.0 II I v LANES i I 1I 1I 0II I I I II \ 146 0.0 0 / I \ / I \ -- 198 24.0 2 I 1 103 0.0 0 / + / 0 0.0 0 North 1 238 24.0 2 -- \ I / 1 0.0 0 \ II 2 I 1 I 1 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 71 I II 0.0 12.0 112.0 I PERMSV NNNN II 0 I 1 I 1 I OVERLP YYYY I II I I I LEADLAG LD LD i I I BOEING - LOT 3B Imo' 10/19/99 N 8TH STREET/GARDEN AVENUE N (EAST) 14:40:52 TJK 8GAE1AF.FOR (1) 2000 W/LOT 6 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 0 - . Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.68 Vehicle Delay 21.4 Level of Service C+ Sq 71 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 Phase 3 **/** * + + IA * + + I ++++ / ' \ <* + +> <++++ vA 1 I I A **** North <* * +> ****> I i i * * + **** * * + v G/C=0.298 ! G/C=0.200 I G/C=0.301 G= 17.9" G= 12.0" I G= 18.1" Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I OFF= 0.0% I OFF=36.5% I OFF=63.2% I C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y=12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% I Lane IWidth/ I g/C I Service Rate! Adj I I HCM I L ' 90% Mal I Group I Lanes' Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E !Volume! v/c Ii Delay I S I Queue SB Approach 22.3 C+ I RT 112/1 10.248 10.298 I 412 I 477 I 329 10.690 I 22.8 I *C+I 193 ftl ILT+TH 112/1 I0.029 10.298 I 471 I 537 I 24 I0.045 I 15.0 I Bid 25 ftl NB Approach 19.3 B I RT 112/1 10.013 I0.200 I 141 I 189 I 2 10.010 I 19.2 I B I 25 ftl ILT+TH 112/1 I0.020 I0.200 I 164 I 218 I 6 I0.027 I 19.3 I *B I 25 ftl WB Approach 20.2 C+ I TH+RTI 24/2 10.229 10.301 I 929 I 998 I 674 10.675 I 20.2 I C+I 199 ftl EB Approach 22.6 C+ it ILT+TH+RTI 24/2 10.251 10.301 I 533 I 600 I 427 10.712 I 22.6 I *C+I 127 ftl ; , f Gt ' BOEING - LOT 3B 10/19/99 N 8TH STREET/GARDEN AVENUE N (EAST) 15:07:13 TJK 8GAE1PM.FOR (1) 2000 W/LOT 6 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Display of Intersection Parameters I I I I I I Key: VOLUMES -- > 57 I 0 I 3 II I I WIDTHS 12.0 1 12.0 I 0.0 II I v LANES 1 I 1 I 0 I I I I II \ 77 0.0 0 / I \ / I \ -- 62 24.0 2 I 1 175 0.0 0 / + / 0 0.0 0 North 1 78 24.0 2 -- \ I / 0 0.0 0 \ II I I I II 0 I 1 I 1 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 71 I II 0.0 12.0 12.0 I PERMSV NNNN I II 0 I 1 I 1 I OVERLP YYYY I II I I I LEADLAG LD LD + I pie` BOEING - LOT 3B 10/19/99 N 8TH STREET/GARDEN AVENUE N (EAST) 15:07:01 TJK 8GAE1PM.FOR (1) 2000 W/LOT 6 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 0 - . Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.29 Vehicle Delay 14.6 Level of Service B+ Sq 71 Phase 1 Phase 2 I Phase 3 I **/** � + * A I + * I + **** I / I \ <+ *> <+ <**** A I I IA ++++ North I I * +> ++++> * + G/C=0.185 I G/C=0.308 I G/C=0.308 G= 11.1" I G= 18.5" I G= 18.5" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" OFF= 0.0% I OFF=25.1% I OFF=62.6% C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y=12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% I Lane [Width/ g/C I Service Rate' Adj I I HCM I L I90% Maxi I Group li Lanes1 Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E [Volume' v/c I Delay I S I Queue I SB Approach 6.8 A I RT 112/1 I0.100 10.559 I 830 I 860 I 100 10.116 I 6.3 I A I 38 ftl ILT+TH 112/1 I0.012 10.251 I 364 I 433 I 5 I0.012 I 16.9 I B I 25 ftl NB Approach • 14.4 B+ I RT i 12/1 I0.006 I0.308 I 423 I 487 I 1 I0.002 I 14.4 I B+I 25 ftl I TH 112/1 I0.005 I0.308 I 507 I 573 I 1 I0.002 I 14.4 I *B+I 25 ftl WB Approach 15.3 B I TH+RTI 24/2 I0.080 I0.308 I 902 I 970 I 175 I0.180 I 15.3 I *B I 52 ftl EB Approach 16.7 B ILT+TH 124/2 10.156 I0.308 1 745 1 813 1 328 I0.403 1 16.7 1 B 1 96 ftl (�(►,F I .1 BOEING - LOT 3B 10/19/99 N 8TH STREET/GARDEN AVENUE N (EAST) 14:25:01 TJK 8GAE2AM.FOR (2) 2000 W/LOT 3B SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Display of Intersection Parameters I I I I I Key: VOLUMES -- > 2 I 9 1 2 II 1 I WIDTHS 112.0 112.0 I 0.0 11 1 v LANES I 1 1 1 I 0 II \ 28 0.0 0 / I \ / I \ -- 42 24.0 2 I 1 10 0.0 0 / + / 1 0.0 0 North 1 1 110 24.0 2 -- \ 1 / 0 0.0 0 \ II I I 11 7 I 2 1 11 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 71 1 II 0.0 12.0 12.0 I PERMSV NNNN 0 1 1 OVERLP YYYY i 1 11 I I I LEADLAG LD LD , BOEING - LOT 3B J ' 10/19/99 ' N 8TH STREET/GARDEN AVENUE N (EAST) 14:24:51 TJK 8GAE2AM.FOR (2) 2000 W/LOT 3B SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 0 - . Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.13 Vehicle Delay 16.8 Level of Service B Sq 71 Phase 1 l Phase 2 Phase 3 **/** + * * A + * * **** • / I \ <+ * *> <**** 1 v w **** 1 A ++++ v North <* * +> ++++> * * * * G/C=0.267 I G/C=0.267 I G/C=0.267 I G= 16.0" G= 16.0" G= 16.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" l Y+R= 4.0" I OFF= 0.0% I OFF=33.3% I OFF=66.7% C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y=12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% I Lane (Width/ 1 g/C I Service Rate' Adj I I HCM I L ' 90% Max' I Group I Lanes' Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E 'Volume' v/c I Delay I S I Queue I SB Approach 16.3 B I RT 112/1 10.010 10.267 I 364 I 431 I 3 10.007 I 16.2 I B I 25 ftl ILT+TH 112/1 10.023 10.267 I 432 I 502 I 17 10.034 I 16.3 I *B I 25 ftl NB Approach 16.4 B I RT 112/1 10.030 10.267 I 344 I 410 I 20 10.049 I 16.4 I B I 25 ftl ILT+TH 112/1 10.023 10.267 I 397 I 465 I 16 10.034 I 16.3 I *B I 25 ftl WB Approach 16.7 B ILT+TH+RTI 24/2 10.052 10.267 I 716 I 792 I 96 10.121 I 16.7 I *B I 31 ftl EB Approach 17.0 B ILT+TH 124/2 10.067 10.267 I 773 I 849 I 141 10.166 I 17.0 I B I 45 ftl ' BOEING - LOT 3B 10/19/99 N 8TH STREET/GARDEN AVENUE N (EAST) 14:48:14 TJK 8GAE2AF.FOR (2) 2000 W/LOT 3B SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Display of Intersection Parameters I I I I I 1 Key: VOLUMES -- > 1 90 I 1 1 84 II 1 I WIDTHS 1 12.0 1 12.0 I 0.0 II 1 v LANES I 1I 1 0II 1 1 I II \ 129 0.0 0 / I \ / I \ -- 171 24.0 2 1 1 97 0.0 0 / + / 0 0.0 0 North 292 24.0 2 -- \ 1 / 1 0.0 0 \ I1 I I I 1 2 1 1 I 1 1 Phasing: SEQUENCE 71 1 I1 0.0 1 12.0 112.0 I PERMSV NNNN 1 I1 0 1 1 1 1 1 OVERLP YYYY 1 I1 I 1 I LEADLAG LD LD 1 BOEING - LOT 3B 10/19/99 N 8TH STREET/GARDEN AVENUE N (EAST) JG(f 14:50:42 TJK 8GAE2AF.FOR (2) 2000 W/LOT 3B SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 0 - . Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.54 Vehicle Delay 18.0 Level of Service B Sq 71 I Phase 1 Phase 2 I Phase 3 I + * * A • ▪ * * ++++ / I \ <+ * *> <++++ v A IA **** North <* * +> ****> * * + **** * * + v G/C=0.231 G C=0.231 G C=0.33 / I / I / 9 1 G= 13.8" I G= 13.8" I G= 20.3" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" OFF= 0.0% I OFF=29.7% I OFF=59.4% I C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y=12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% I Lane IWidth/ I g/C I Service Rate' Adj I I HCM I L 190% Max' I Group I Lanes' Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E 'Volume' v/c I Delay I S I Queue I SB Approach 20.6 C+ I RT 112/1 10.151 10.231 I 301 I 369 I 176 10.477 I 20.9 I C+I 114 ftl ILT+TH 112/1 10.130 10.231 I 342 I 413 I 167 10.404 I 20.2 I *C+I 108 ftl NB Approach 17.9 B I RT 112/1 10.013 10.231 I 168 I 221 I 2 10.009 I 17.8 I B I 25 ftl ILT+TH 112/1 10.020 10.231 I 196 I 254 I 6 10.024 I 17.9 1 *B I 25 ftl WB Approach 16.4 B I TH+RTI 24/2 10.204 10.339 11062 11122 I 588 10.524 I 16.4 I B 1164 ftl EB Approach 18.3 B ILT+TH+RTI 24/2 10.245 10.339 I 715 I 777 I 487 10.627 I 18.3 I *B 1137 ftl ff ' BOEING - LOT 3B 10/19/99 N 8TH STREET/GARDEN AVENUE N (EAST) 15:09:22 TJK 8GAE2PM.FOR (2) 2000 W/LOT 3B SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Display of Intersection Parameters I 37 I 0 1 17 II I Key: iWIOLUMEDTHS > 12.0 I12.0 I 0.0 II I v LANES 1 1 0 I I II \ 76 0.0 0 / I \ / I \ ' -- 62 24.0 2 I 172 0.0 0 / + / 0 0.0 0 North I 88 24.0 2 -- \ I / 0 0.0 0 \ II 0 I 1 I 1 1 Phasing: SEQUENCE 71 I II 0.0 12.0 112.0 I PERMSV NNNN I II 0 I 1 I 1 I OVERLP YYYY I II I I I LEADLAG LD LD 1 1 I BOEING - LOT 3B 10/19/99 N 8TH STREET/GARDEN AVENUE N (EAST) f cr 15:09:04 TJK 8GAE2PM.FOR (2) 2000 W/LOT 3B SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 0 - . Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.29 Vehicle Delay 15.3 Level of Service B Sq 71 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 **/** + * + I A + * + ' **** / I \ <+ *> <+ <**** A ' A '++++ North * +>'++++> ' * + I * + I G/C=0.185 I G/C=0.308 I G/C=0.308 I G= 11.1" G= 18.5" G= 18.5" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" OFF= 0.0% I OFF=25.1% I OFF=62.6% I C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y=12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% I Lane (Width/ 1 g/C I Service Rate' Adj I I HCM I L 190% Maxi I Group I Lanes' Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E 'Volume' v/c I Delay I S I Queue I SB Approach 9.6 A I RT 112/1 10.072 10.559 I 830 I 860 I 65 10.076 I 6.1 I A I 25 ftl ILT+TH 112/1 10.035 10.251 I 364 I 433 I 30 10.069 I 17.2 I B I 25 ftl NB Approach 14.4 B+ I RT 112/1 10.006 10.308 I 423 I 487 I 1 10.002 ' 14.4 I B+I 25 ftl I TH 112/1 10.005 10.308 I 507 I 573 I 1 10.002 I 14.4 I *B+' 25 ftl WB Approach 15.3 B I TH+RTI 24/2 10.079 10.308 I 902 I 970 I 174 10.179 I 15.3 I *B I 52 ftl EB Approach 16.8 B ILT+TH 124/2 10.159 10.308 I 746 I 814 I 337 10.414 ' 16.8 I B I 99 ftl i Park Avenue/Lot 3B South Access HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1b . TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS V L'5 Analyst: TJK r:\99165-60\HCS\pa3b2am.hcu ] ersection: Park Avenue N / Lot 3B South Access C nt Date: 2000 t_., 7' ,e Period: AM Peak 1 Intersection Orientation: North-South Major St. V qicle Volume Data: i r Movements: 2 3 5 9 G ume: 769 6 1241 5 EE :: 854 7 1379 6 / PHF: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHV: 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Pedestrian Volume Data: N 'ements: Flow: L--.e width: h k speed: "lockage: Median Type: None k If vehicles: 0 E. [red approach Movements: # of vehicles: Eastbound 0 f If vehicles: Westbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R N Y N N Y Y N N N mnelized: N de: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R N Y N N Y N N N N C; nnelized: N Ade: 0.00 L--le usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: i Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R N N Y N N N N N N innelized: N %.___ide: 0.00 [; ,te usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R N N N N N N N N N innelized: N 3rade: 0.00 , ___ :.a for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: Northbound Southbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 0 0 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 2 2 Length of study period, hrs: 0.25 Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 9 t c,base 6.9 t c,hv 2.0 P by 0.02 t c,g 0.1 G 0.00 t 3,1t 0.0 t c,T: 1 stage 0.00 t c 1 stage 6.9 Follow Up Time Calculations: Movement 9 t f,base 3.3 t f,HV 1.0 P by 0.02 t f 3.3 Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 Conflicting Flows 431 Potential Capacity 573 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Movement Capacity 573 Probability of Queue free St. 0.99 Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 II I � I v(vph) 6 C m(vph) 573 v/c 0.01 95% queue length Control Delay 11.3 LOS B Approach Delay 11.3 Approach LOS B HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1b f co- - i TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS 5 Analyst: TJK r:\99165-60\HCS\pa3b2af.hcu 7 :ersection: Park Avenue N / Lot 3B South Access C t Date: 2000 1in 7 ie Period: Afternoon Peak Intersection Orientation: North-South Major St. I iicle Volume Data: Movements: 2 3 5 9 .ume: 845 6 1096 61 12 'l: 939 7 1218 68 / PHF: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 J PHV: 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Pedestrian Volume Data: LV' ,ements: Flow: I--Le width: H k speed: "dockage: Median Type: None t - If vehicles: 0 F red approach Movements: # of vehicles: Eastbound 0 (I 'f vehicles: Westbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R N Y N N Y Y N N N C nnnelized: N C 1de: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R N Y N N Y N N N N C .nnelized: N C .de: 0.00 I-tee usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R N N Y N N N N N N C nnelized: N .de: 0.00 L Le usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: j Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R N N N N N N N N N 1 nnelized: N 3rade: 0.00 CI . 'a for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: Northbound Southbound Shared in volume, major th vehicles: 0 0 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 2 2 Length of study period, hrs: 0.25 Rorksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 9 t c,base 6.9 t c,hv 2.0 P by 0.02 t c,g 0.1 0.00 t 3,1t 0.0 t c,T: 1 stage 0.00 c �1 stage 6.9 Follow Up Time Calculations: Movement 9 c f,base 3.3 t f,HV 1.0 P by 0.02 t f 3.3 Rorksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 2onflicting Flows 473 Potential Capacity 538 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Movement Capacity 538 Probability of Queue free St. 0.87 Rorksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 v(vph) 68 2 m(vph) 538 • v/c 0.13 95% queue length Control Delay 12.7 LOS B rpproach Delay 12.7 kpproach LOS B _ HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1b ✓ c.P TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS 5 Analyst: TJK r:\99165-60\HCS\pa3b2pm.hcu 4 :ersection: Park Avenue N / Lot 3B South Access 9 int Date: 2000 _-_ne Period: PM Peak T--*.ersection Orientation: North-South Major St. licle Volume Data: -z 3 Movements: 2 3 5 9 Lime: 962 2 997 14 i 2: 1069 2 1108 16 J 09 PHF: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHV: 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Pedestrian Volume Data: cements: Flow: ie width: Lk speed: 3lockage: Median Type: None I )f vehicles: 0 ired approach Movements: # of vehicles: Eastbound 0 I )f vehicles: Westbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R N Y N N Y Y N N N Innelized: N fide: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R N Y N N Y N N N N 3nnelized: N ide: 0.00 re usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: i Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R N N Y N N N N N N innelized: N __ade: 0.00 ?e usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R N N N N N N N N N innelized: N 'rade: 0.00 _�a for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: Northbound Southbound Snared In volume, major th vehicles: 0 0 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 2 2 Length of study period, hrs: 0.25 Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 9 t c,base 6.9 t c,hv 2.0 P by 0.02 t c,g 0.1 G 0.00 t 3,1t 0.0 t c,T: 1 stage 0.00 t c 1 stage 6.9 Follow Up Time Calculations: Movement 9 t f,base 3.3 t f,HV 1.0 P by 0.02 t f 3.3 Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 Conflicting Flows 536 Potential Capacity 489 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Movement Capacity 489 Probability of Queue free St. 0.97 Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 II . . 1 v(vph) 16 C m(vph) 489 v/c 0.03 95% queue length Control Delay 12.6 LOS B Approach Delay 12.6 Approach LOS B Garden Avenue/South Access Driveway HCS: tJnsignalized Intersections Release 3.1b �/_ 1 � � IGj TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS j Analyst: TJK r:\99165-60\HCS\6sgalam.hcu q tersection: Lot 6 South Driveway / Garden Avenue North (° 1 ant Date: 2000 (i --.? 6:— S me Period: AM Peak 4 tersection Orientation: North-South Major St. 6 1 R ("7 hide Volume Data: ( 2 3 Movements: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ' Lume: 0 44 2 2 10 0 1 0 5 0 0 3 1 R: 0 80 4 4 20 0 3 0 13 0 0 12 PHF: 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.25 0.25 0.25 D,-7V: 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 i Pedestrian Volume Data: 1 iements: Flow: ie width: I Lk speed: 3lockage: Median Type: None )f vehicles: 0 L-ared approach Movements: u-pf vehicles: Eastbound 0 )f vehicles: Westbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y Y N N Y Y N N N ( innelized: N ( ide: 0.00 T•.ne usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y Y N N Y Y N N N ( innelized: N ( ide: 0.00 ze usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y Y Y N N N N N N innelized: N (,ade: 0.00 'ie usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: ' Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y Y Y N N N N N N ( _innelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lava for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: I Northbound Southbound ( I Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 22 5 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 2 0 ' Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 1700 _ Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 2 2 Length of study period, hrs: 0.25 -- Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 t c,base 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 t c,hv 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 P hv 0.03 0.33 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c,g 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t 3,1t 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 t c,T: 1 stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c 1 stage 4.2 4.8 7.8 6.8 7.2 7.5 6.5 , 6.9 - Follow Up Time Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 t f,base 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 t f,HV 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 P hv 0.03 0.33 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 t f 2.2 2.5 3.7 4.2 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.3 Norksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. \ 9 12 Conflicting Flows 42 10 ' Potential Capacity 973 1075 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 973 1075 Probability of Queue free St. 0.99 0.99 i Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 Conflicting Flows 84 20 , Potential Capacity 1312 1587 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1312 1587 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Maj. L Shared in. Prob. Queue Free St. 1.00 1.00 ' Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 Conflicting Flows 110 112 Potential Capacity 746 782 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 744 780 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 i Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Conflicting Flows 100 68 1 Potential Capacity 830 923 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 0.98 Movement Capacity 819 908 i Norksheet 8 Shared Lane Calculations Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 I 11 1 IITr: 0 13 0 0 12 vement Capacity 819 744 973 908 780 1075 ired Lane Capacity 944 1075 rksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 II II 1 v,vph) 4 16 12 C m(vph) 1587 1312 944 1075 0.00 0.02 0.01 queue length ntrol Delay 7.8 8.9 8.4 LOS A A A Approach Delay 8.9 8.4 proach LOS A A rksheet 11 Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Rank 1 Delay Calculations Movement 2 5 DJ 1.00 1.00 it 22 5 ✓ i2 2 0 S it 1700 1700 i2 1700 1700 0j 1.00 1.00 maj left 0.0 7.8 N number major st lanes 2 2 Delay, rank 1 mvmts 0.0 0.0 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1b TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: TJK r:\99165-60\HCS\6sgalaf.hcu Intersection: Lot 6 South Driveway / Garden Avenue North Count Date: 2000 Time Period: Afternoon Peak Intersection Orientation: North-South Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Movements: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Volume: 2 237 2 1 165 0 18 0 8 2 0 1 HFR: 4 439 4 2 375 0 53 0 24 5 0 3 PHF: 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.38 0.38 0.38 PHV: 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.67 0.67 0.67 I � Pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: Flow: Lane width: Walk speed: % Blockage: Median Type: None # of vehicles: 0 i I Flared approach Movements: # of vehicles: Eastbound 0 # of vehicles: Westbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y Y N N Y Y N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y Y N N Y Y N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y Y Y N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y Y Y N N N N N N Channelized: N grade: 0.00 Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: 1 Northbound Southbound ired In volume, major th vehicles: 118 82 L... red lr, volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 1700 • flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 ] nber of major street through lanes: 2 2 Length of study period, hrs: 0.25 Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Ltical Gap Calculations: 1 cement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 t c,base 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 t c,hv 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1 nr 0.02 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.67 0.67 0.67 1 c,g 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t 3,1t 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 c,T: stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c 1 stage 4.1 4.1 7.6 6.6 7.0 8.8 7.8 , 8.2 Llow Up Time Calculations: 1..,cement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 t f,base 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 1 f,HV 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 TV 0.02 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.67 0.67 0.67 t f 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 4.2 4.7 4.0 1 rksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 1 nflicting Flows 221 188 tential Capacity 776 654 =-destrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 776 654 D-obability of Queue free St. 0.97 1.00 �ep 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 nflicting Flows 443 375 tential Capacity 1121 1180 destrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1121 1180 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 ] j. L Shared ln. Prob. Queue Free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 nflicting Flows 828 830 tential Capacity 301 207 redestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 0.99 --vement Capacity 300 206 1 obability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 nflicting Flows 640 606 __tential Capacity 356 271 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.99 0.99 j. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 1.00 1.00 p. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 0.97 ,...,vement Capacity 353 262 I rksheet 8 Shared Lane Calculations Shared Lane Calculations vement 7 8 9 10 11 12 v(vph) 53 0 24 5 0 3 Movement Capacity 353 300 776 262 206 654 Shared Lane Capacity 424 327 Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 v(vph) 4 2 76 8 C m(vph) 1180 1121 424 327 v/c 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.02 95% queue length Control Delay 8.1 8.2 15.3 16.3 LOS A A C C Approach Delay 15.3 16.3 Approach LOS C C Worksheet 11 Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Rank 1 Delay Calculations Movement 2 5 P of 1.00 1.00 ✓ it 118 82 ✓ i2 0 0 S ii 1700 1700 S i2 1700 1700 P* Oj 1.00 1.00 D maj left 8.1 8.2 N number major st lanes 2 2 Delay, rank 1 mvmts 0.0 0.0 • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1b J TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS , alyst: TJK r:\99165-60\HCS\6sgalpm.hcu tersection: Lot 6 South Driveway / Garden Avenue North 1 mt Date: 2000 Time Period: PM Peak :ersection Orientation: North-South Major St. '.,-:nicle Volume Data: r'-vements: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lume: 5 253 1 0 55 0 8 0 33 0 0 1 HFR: 6 305 1 0 90 0 10 0 42 0 0 4 PHF: 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.25 0.25 0.25 1: 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Pedestrian Volume Data: L.,vements: '"ow: ne width: 1 Lk speed: t Blockage: Sian Type: None )f vehicles: 0 Flared approach Movements: Df vehicles: Eastbound 0 Df vehicles: Westbound 0 r=ne usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 I L T R L T R L T R Y Y N N Y Y N N N annelized: N ade: 0.00 ne usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: 1 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 ' L T R L T R L T R Y Y N N Y Y N N N P annelized: N Lade: 0.00 one usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y Y Y N N N N N N annelized: N Grade: 0.00 ne usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: - Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y Y Y N N N N N N Cnannelized: N Grade: 0.00 1 Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: 1 Northbound Southbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 126 27 Shared in volume, major rt vehicles: 2 0 ' Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 2 2 Length of studyperiod, hrs: 0.25 - g Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 , t c,base 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 _ t c,hv 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 P hv 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 t c,g 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t 3,1t 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - t c,T: 1 stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c 1 stage 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 , 6.9 Follow Up Time Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 t f,base 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 t f,HV 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 ' i P hv 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t f 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 Conflicting Flows 153 45 , Potential Capacity 872 1021 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 872 1021 Probability of. Queue free St. 0.95 1.00 Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 Conflicting Flows 306 90 Potential Capacity 1252 1503 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1252 1503 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Maj. L Shared ln. Prob. Queue Free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 Conflicting Flows 408 408 Potential Capacity 536 536 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 534 533 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Conflicting Flows 363 255 1 Potential Capacity 573 683 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 0.95 Movement Capacity 569 648 Worksheet 8 Shared Lane Calculations Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 ------------------------------ II I II -'vph) 10 0 42 0 0 4 : vement Capacity 569 534 872 648 533 1021 ared Lane Capacity 790 1021 rksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 II I I II I . ,vph) 6 52 4 C m(vph) 1503 1252 790 1021 0.00 0.07 0.00 % queue length ntrol Delay 7.4 9.9 8.5 LOS A A A Approach Delay 9.9 8.5 proach LOS A A rksheet 11 Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay ____Zk 1 Delay Calculations Movement 2 5 of 1.00 1.00 ' it 126 27 v i2 2 0 S i1 1700 1700 i2 1700 1700 0j 1.00 1.00 naj left 7.4 0.0 N number major st lanes 2 2 Delay, rank 1 mvmts 0.0 0.0 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1b 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS • •i Analyst: TJK r:\99165-60\HCS\6sga2am.hcu Intersection: Lot 6 South Driveway / Garden Avenue North Count Date: 2000 Time Period: AM Peak Intersection Orientation: North-South Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Movements: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Volume: 3 38 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 3 0 5 HFR: 5 69 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 12 0 20 PHF: 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.25 0.25 0.25 PHV: 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 I i 1 Pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: Flow: Lane width: Walk speed: % Blockage: Median Type: None # of vehicles: 0 Flared approach Movements: # of vehicles: Eastbound 0 # of vehicles: Westbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y Y N N Y Y N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y Y N N Y Y N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 ' Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R L N N N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y N N N N Y N N N I Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: Northbound Southbound ared In volume, major th vehicles: 19 3 bnared la volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 1700 - t flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 tuber of major street through lanes: 2 2 Length of study period, hrs: 0.25 1 Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. itical Gap Calculations: vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 t c,base 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 c,hv 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 by 0.03 0.33 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 c,g 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t 3,1t 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 c,T: stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c _7 stage 4.2 4.8 7.8 6.8 7.2 7.5 6.5 , 6.9 llow Up Time Calculations: rvement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 f,base 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 f,HV 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 by 0.03 0.33 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 t f 2.2 2.5 3.7 4.2 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.3 rksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 nflicting Flows 35 7 tential Capacity 984 1080 ,-destrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 984 1080 "~obability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.98 step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 nflicting Flows 69 14 tential Capacity 1330 1595 'destrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1330 1595 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 i j. L Shared ln. Prob. Queue Free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 nflicting Flows 94 94 tential Capacity 762 800 1--destrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 -- vement Capacity 759 797 i 'obability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 nflicting Flows 87 59 __tential Capacity 848 935 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 M-=j. L, Min T Impedance factor 1.00 1.00 j. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 1.00 1.00 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.98 1.00 movement Capacity 830 933 rksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 v(vph) 5 12 20 C m(vph) 1595 1330 830 759 984 933 797 1080 v/c 0.00 0.01 0.02 95% queue length Control Delay 7.3 8.9 8.4 LOS A A A Approach Delay 8.6 Approach LOS A Worksheet 11 Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Rank 1 Delay Calculations Movement 2 5 P of 1.00 1.00 V it 19 3 ✓ i2 0 0 S it 1700 1700 S i2 1700 1700 P* Oj 1.00 1.00 D maj left 7.3 0.0 N number major st lanes 2 2 Delay, rank 1 mvmts 0.0 0.0 f HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1b , TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS - alyst: TJK r:\99165-60\HCS\6sga2af.hcu tersection: Lot 6 South Driveway / Garden Avenue North ant Date: 2000 Time Period: Afternoon Peak tersection Orientation: North-South Major St. __hicle Volume Data: M^vements: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 lame: 4 214 0 0 102 0 0 0 0 55 0 77 rirR: 7 396 0 0 232 0 0 0 0 145 0 203 PHF: 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.38 0.38 0.38 --V: 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.67 0.67 0.67 Pedestrian Volume Data: ___vements: Plow: ae width: I 1k speed: Blockage: - Sian Type: None of vehicles: 0 Flared approach Movements: of vehicles: Eastbound 0 of vehicles: Westbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y Y N N Y Y N N N 1 annelized: N r ade: 0.00 ae usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y Y N N Y Y N N N 1 annelized: N Lade: 0.00 ne usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R L N N N N N N N N annelized: N Grade: 0.00 ae usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y N N N N Y N N N Lnannelized: N Grade: 0.00 Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: I Northbound Southbound , Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 107 51 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 • Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 2 2 Length of study period, hrs: 0.25 Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 t c,base 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 t c,hv 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 P hv 0.02 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.67 0.67 0.67 t c,g 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t 3,1t 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 t c,T: 1 i 1 stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c 1 stage 4.1 4.1 7.6 6.6 7.0 8.8 7.8 8.2 Follow Up Time Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 t f,base 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 t f,HV 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 r P hv 0.02 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.67 0.67 0.67 t f 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 4.2 4.7 4.0 Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 Conflicting Flows 198 116 Potential Capacity 804 741 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 804 741 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.73 Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 Conflicting Flows 396 232 Potential Capacity 1166 1333 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1166 1333 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.99 Maj. L Shared ln. Prob. Queue Free St. 1.00 0.99 Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 Conflicting Flows 643 643 Potential Capacity 386 280 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 0.99 _ Movement Capacity 384 279 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Conflicting Flows 527 445 Potential Capacity 430 371 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.99 0.99 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.72 1.00 Movement Capacity 311 369 Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 v(vph) 7 145 203 m(vph) 1333 1166 311 384 804 369 279 741 c 0.01 0.39 0.27 queue length Control Delay 7.7 20.9 11.7 r.nS A C B proach Delay 15.5 proach LOS C rksheet 11 Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Rank 1 Delay Calculations vement 2 5 of 0.99 1.00 V i1 107 51 v i2 0 0 i1 1700 1700 i2 1700 1700 Oj 0.99 1.00 D maj left 7.7 0.0 "' number major st lanes 2 2 lay, rank 1 mvmts 0.0 0.0 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1b _TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: TJK r:\99165-60\HCS\6sga2pm.hcu Intersection: Lot 6 South Driveway / Garden Avenue North Count Date: 2000 Time Period: PM Peak Intersection Orientation: North-South Major St. r Vehicle Volume Data: Movements: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Volume: 5 250 0 0 43 0 0 0 0 11 0 15 HFR: 6 301 0 0 70 0 0 0 0 44 0 60 PHF: 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.25 0.25 0.25 PHV: 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 , Pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: Flow: , Lane width: Walk speed: % Blockage: Median Type: None # of vehicles: 0 Flared approach Movements:pp v ents: # of vehicles: Eastbound 0 # of vehicles: Westbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y Y N N Y Y N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y Y N N Y Y N N N -- Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R L N N N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: i Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y N N N N Y N N N ' 1 i Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: Northbound Southbound Bred In volume, major th vehicles: 125 21 snared lA volume, major rt vehicles: 2 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 1700 flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 1 nber of major street through lanes: 2 2 Length of study period, hrs: 0.25 Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. 1 itical Gap Calculations: 1 vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 t c,base 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 - c,hv 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 by 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 c,g 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t 3,1t 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 c,T: stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c 1 stage 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 . 6.9 11ow Up Time Calculations: movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 f,base 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 f,HV 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 by 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t f 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 rksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 nflicting Flows 151 35 tential Capacity 875 1036 r-destrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 875 1036 ^-obability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.94 step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 nflicting Flows 301 70 tential Capacity 1257 1528 destrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1257 1528 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 j. L Shared ln. Prob. Queue Free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 nflicting Flows 384 384 tential Capacity 553 553 redestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 vement Capacity 551 551 j obability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 nflicting Flows 348 233 `:tential Capacity 587 707 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 M-j. L, Min T Impedance factor 1.00 1.00 j. L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 1.00 1.00 p. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.94 1.00 movement Capacity 551 705 rksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 v(vph) 6 44 60 C m(vph) 1528 1257 551 551 875 705 551 1036 v/c 0.00 0.06 0.06 95% queue length Control Delay 7.4 10.4 8.7 LOS A B A Approach Delay 9.4 Approach LOS A Worksheet 11 Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Rank 1 Delay Calculations Movement 2 5 P of 1.00 1.00 ✓ it 125 21 ✓ i2 2 0 S it 1700 1700 S i2 1700 1700 P* 0j 1.00 1.00 D maj left 7.4 0.0 N number major st lanes 2 2 Delay, rank 1 mvmts 0.0 0.0 . Garden Avenue/North Access Driveway HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1b 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS / Gr. ^alyst: TJK r:\99165-60\HCS\6ngalam.hcu tersection: Lot 6 North Driveway / Garden Avenue North ant Date: 2000 .,me Period: AM Peak `-tersection Orientation: North-South Major St. I hide Volume Data: Movements: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 fume: 6 39 3 1 3 1 1 11 3 0 24 9 R: 9 58 4 2 6 2 1 16 4 0 29 11 PHF: 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.83 0.83 0.83 PH17: 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.09 0.09 0.09 Pedestrian Volume Data: vements: Flow: ne width: 1k speed: Blockage: Iedian Type: None nf vehicles: 0 ._erred approach Movements: u nf vehicles: Eastbound 0 nf vehicles: Westbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y Y N N Y Y N N N annelized: N ade: 0.00 t• ne usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y Y N N Y Y N N N • annelized: N ade: 0.00 ne usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y Y Y N N N N N N 1 annelized: N 3,_ade: 0.00 ne usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y Y Y N N N N N N annelized: N 3rade: 0.00 1 Later for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: 1 Northbound Southbound ) Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 19 1 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 y ' Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 • 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 -, Number of major street through lanes: 2 2 Length of study period, hrs: 0.25 1 Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 t c,base 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 t c,hv 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 P hv 0.14 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.09 0.09 0.09 t c,g 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t 3,1t 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 t c,T: 1 stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 i t c 1 stage 4.4 4.1 7.6 6.6 7.0 7.7 6.7 7.1 Follow Up Time Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 t f,base 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 t f,HV 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 P hv 0.14 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.09 0.09 0.09 t f 2.3 2.2 3.6 4.1 3.4 3.6 , 4.1 3.4 Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 Conflicting Flows 31 4 Potential Capacity 1023 1056 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1023 1056 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.99 Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 Conflicting Flows 63 8 Potential Capacity 1553 1528 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1553 1528 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.99 Maj. L Shared ln. Prob. Queue Free St. 1.00 0.99 Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 Conflicting Flows 90 92 Potential Capacity 790 782 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 0.99 Movement Capacity 784 776 Probability of Queue free St. 0.98 0.96 , • Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Conflicting Flows 100 66 Potential Capacity 860 900 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.96 0.97 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.97 0.98 -+ Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.96 0.97 , Movement Capacity 822 877 Worksheet 8 Shared Lane Calculations Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 II i v(vph) 1 16 4 0 29 11 I Bement Capacity 822 784 1023 877 776 1056 gyred Lane Capacity 825 837 r-rksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS I vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 II II 1 I it ' _vph) 9 2 22 40 C m(vph) 1528 1553 825 837 v/c 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.05 queue length atrol Delay 7.4 7.3 9.5 9.5 L�3 A A A A Approach Delay 9.5 9.5 oroach LOS A A I rksheet 11 Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay ] ak 1 Delay Calculations Movement 2 5 Di 0.99 1.00 it 19 1 • i2 0 0 S i1 1700 1700 • i2 1700 1700 Oj 0.99 1.00 ! naj left 7.4 7.3 N number major st lanes 2 2 Delay, rank 1 mvmts 0.0 0.0 • • .. HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1b TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS J G re' ;! Analyst: TJK r:\99165-60\HCS\6ngalaf.hcu Intersection: Lot 6 North Driveway / Garden Avenue North Count Date: 2000 rime Period: Afternoon Peak Intersection Orientation: North-South Major St. i I Vehicle Volume Data: Kovements: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Volume: 1 248 1 0 52 0 27 21 177 2 29 12 HER: 2 428 2 0 90 0 48 38 316 3 38 16 PHF: 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.77 0.77 0.77 PHV: 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.02 0.02 0.02 Pedestrian Volume Data: i Kovements: Flow: Lane width: calk speed: k Blockage: Median Type: None of vehicles: 0 I Flared approach Movements: '# of vehicles: Eastbound 0 of vehicles: Westbound 0 bane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y Y N N Y Y N N N 2hannelized: N 3rade: 0.00 bane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y Y N N Y Y N N N 2hannelized: N 3rade: 0.00 • bane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 I L T R L T R L T R Y Y Y N N N N N N 2hannelized: N _ 3rade: 0.00 1,ane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y Y Y N N N N N N 2hannelized: N 3rade: 0.00 data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: ' Northbound Southbound c_' tred In volume, major th vehicles: 124 26 '___red In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 Sat`flowlrate, major th vehicles: 1700 1700 _i. flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 I fiber of major street through lanes: 2 2 1 Length of study period, hrs: 0.25 Aorksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. • .tical Gap Calculations: cement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 t c,base 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 r- -c,hv 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 f iv 0.01 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.02 0.02 0.02 c,g 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,1t 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 c,T: stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 c 1 stage 4.1 4.1 7.6 6.6 7.0 7.5 6.5 6.9 low Up Time Calculations: -ement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 f,base 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 f,HV 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 iv 0.01 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.02 0.02 0.02 _ 2 2.2 2.2 3.6 4.1 3.4 3.5 4.0 3.3 :ksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 iflicting Flows 215 45 :ential Capacity 778 1015 3estrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 dovement Capacity 778 1015 Probability of Queue free St. 0.59 0.98 ,map 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 ^nflicting Flows 429 90 :ential Capacity 1141 1511 3estrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 novement Capacity 1141 1511 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 j . L Shared ln. Prob. Queue Free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 nflicting Flows 522 522 tential Capacity 450 458 3estrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 :ap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 "^vement Capacity 449 457 1 I obability of Queue free St. 0.92 0.92 I step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 1 inflicting Flows 496 326 tential Capacity 448 604 ?edestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 4aj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.92 0.92 j. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.94 0.94 p. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.92 0.56 __vement Capacity 413 335 rksheet 8 Shared Lane Calculations shared Lane Calculations _ vement 7 8 9 10 11 12 i v(vph) 48 38 316 II 3 38 16 Movement Capacity 413 449 778 335 457 1015 Shared Lane Capacity 662 529 Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 v(vph) 2 I402 I � 56 C m(vph) 1511 1141 662 529 v/c 0.00 0.61 0.11 95% queue length Control Delay 7.4 18.4 12.6 LOS A C B Approach Delay 18.4 12.6 Approach LOS C B Worksheet 11 Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Rank 1 Delay Calculations Movement 2 5 P of 1.00 1.00 ✓ it 124 26 ✓ i2 0 0 S it 1700 1700 S i2 1700 1700 P* Oj 1.00 1.00 D maj left 7.4 0.0 N number major st lanes 2 2 Delay, rank 1 mvmts 0.0 0.0 • ' I • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1b TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS P-' lyst: ,TJK r:\99165-60\HCS\6ngalpm.hou 'r Gf.. : :ersection: Lot 6 North Driveway / Garden Avenue North Int Date: 2000 i.me Period: PM Peak `--:ersection Orientation: North-South Major St. S iicle Volume Data: Movements: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 S Lume: 4 289 0 1 3 0 4 7 6 13 6 33 E__3: 4 298 0 3 9 0 7 11 10 14 7 36 PHF: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.91 0.91 0.91 PT-TT: 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.02 0.02 0.02 Pedestrian Volume Data: . ); cements: Flow: I Le width: r .k speed: i dockage: Iedian Type: None k If vehicles: 0 Eared approach Movements: k -)f vehicles: Eastbound 0 k, )f vehicles: Westbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y Y N N Y Y N N N mnelized: N Lde: 0.00 Gene usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y Y N N Y Y N N N • C Lnnelized: N Lde: 0.00 L 'die usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 _ I L T R L T R L T R Y Y Y N N N N N N I mnelized: N ,rade: 0.00 [ Le usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: I ! Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R I Y Y Y N N N N N N -.__,:innelized: N 3rade: 0.00 JaLa for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: • Northbound Southbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 144 1 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 t Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 2 2 I Length of study period, hrs: 0.25 Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 t c,base 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 t c,hv 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 P hv 0.03 0.25 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.02 0.02 0.02 + t c,g 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t 3,1t 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 t c,T: 1 stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c 1 stage 4.2 4.6 7.7 6.7 7.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 Follow Up Time Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 - t f,base 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 t f,HV 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 t hv 0.03 0.25 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.02 0.02 0.02 t f 2.2 2.5 3.6 4.1 3.4 3.5 4.0 3.3 Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 Conflicting Flows 149 5 Potential Capacity 840 1077 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 840 1077 Probability of Queue free St. 0.99 0.97 Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 Conflicting Flows 298 9 Potential Capacity 1109 1602 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1109 1602 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 _ Maj. L Shared ln. Prob. Queue Free St. 1.00 1.00 • Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 Conflicting Flows 321 321 Potential Capacity 572 594 ' Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 0.99 Movement Capacity 569 591 Probability of Queue free St. 0.98 0.99 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Conflicting Flows 320 178 ' i Potential Capacity 584 767 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.98 0.97 - Maj. L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 0.99 0.98 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.95 0.97 Movement Capacity 558 744 Worksheet 8 Shared Lane Calculations Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 I I • I II 1 II II 1 v'trph) 7 11 10 14 7 36 f rement Capacity 558 569 840 744 591 1077 fired Lane Capacity 639 892 I :ksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS i cement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 II I I II I i .iph) 4 3 28 57 C m(vph) 1602 1109 639 892 17./ 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.06 ! queue length itrol Delay 7.3 8.3 10.9 9.3 Lu3 A A B A kpproach Delay 10.9 9.3 • ?roach LOS B A :ksheet 11 Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay 1__ik 1 Delay Calculations Movement 2 5 6 ?j 1.00 1.00 L1 144 1 "v i2 0 0 3 i1 1700 1700 • i2 1700 1700 I Oj 1.00 1.00 naj left 7.3 8.3 ✓ number major st lanes 2 2 Delay, rank 1 mvmts 0.0 0.0 • HCS:• Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1b TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS ¶ , Analyst: TJK r:\99165-60\HCS\6nga2am.hcu Intersection: Lot 6 North Driveway / Garden Avenue North ; h Count Date: 2000 Time Period: AM Peak Intersection Orientation: North-South Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: - - Movements: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 Volume: 9 31 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 9 HFR: 13 46 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 5 0 11 PHF: 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.83 0.83 0.83 PHV: 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.09 0.09 0.09 Pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: Flow: Lane width: Walk speed: % Blockage: Median Type: None # of vehicles: 0 Flared approach Movements: # of vehicles: Eastbound 0 # of vehicles: Westbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R 1 Y Y N N Y Y N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y Y N N Y Y N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 • Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R L N N N N N N N N -1 Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y N N N N Y N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: Northbound Southbound ared In volume, major th vehicles: 15 0 :,:.:fired ir} volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 1700 • flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 I nber of major street through lanes: 2 2 Length of study period, hrs: 0.25 Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. ( Ltical Gap Calculations: I cement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 t c,base 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 t- c,hv 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1 iv 0.14 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.09 0.09 0.09 I Ic,g 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t 3,1t 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 I c,T: stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c 1 stage 4.4 4.1 7.6 6.6 7.0 7.7 6.7 7.1 ] Llow Up Time Calculations: t.�.cement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 t f,base 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 I f,HV 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 ] iv 0.14 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.09 0.09 0.09 t f 2.3 2.2 3.6 4.1 3.4 3.6 4.1 3.4 4 cksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 ( iflicting Flows 23 1 1 :ential Capacity 1035 1060 Llestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1035 1060 P-obability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.99 S,.ep 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 c-zflicting Flows 46 2 ] :ential Capacity 1574 1536 ] lestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1574 1536 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.99 t j. L Shared ln. Prob. Queue Free St. 1.00 0.99 Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 y ,iflicting Flows 75 74 1 :ential Capacity 805 800 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 0.99 r-vement Capacity 798 793 ibability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 6 iflicting Flows 73 51 L :ential Capacity 898 922 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.99 0.99 I j. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.99 0.99 ( D. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.98 0.99 t-..,,cement Capacity 883 916 I cksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 it v(vph) 13 5 11 C m(vph) 1536 1574 883 798 1035 916 793 1060 v/c 0.01 0.01 0.01 95% queue length Control Delay 7.4 8.9 8.4 LOS A A A Approach Delay 8.6 Approach LOS A Worksheet 11 Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Rank 1 Delay Calculations Movement 2 5 P of 0.99 1.00 ✓ i1 15 0 ✓ i2 0 0 S it 1700 1700 S i2 1700 1700 P* Oj 0.99 1.00 D maj left 7.4 0.0 N number major st lanes 2 2 Delay, rank 1 mvmts 0.0 -1.$ I HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1b - TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS r^alyst: TJK r:\99165-60\HCS\6nga2af.hcu :ersection: Lot 6 North Driveway / Garden Avenue North ant Date: 2000 Time Period: Afternoon Peak : :ersection Orientation: North-South Major St. 1 iicle Volume Data: Movements: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 Lume: 2 264 0 0 49 0 0 0 0 56 0 51 I-A: 3 455 0 0 84 0 0 0 0 73 0 66 PHF: 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.77 0.77 0.77 P.-"T: 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.02 0.02 0.02 Pedestrian Volume Data: 1 cements: Flow: 1 ie width: I Lk speed: '_ 3lockage: W-dian Type: None )f vehicles: 0 Neared approach Movements: )f vehicles: Eastbound 0 )f vehicles: Westbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y Y N N Y Y N N N r innelized: N i ide: 0.00 ---le usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y Y N N Y Y N N N 1 innelized: N i 3de: 0.00 ne usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R N N N N N N N N N annelized: N tirade: 0.00 ne usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y N N N N Y N N N c.:annelized: N Grade: 0.00 Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: Northbound Southbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 132 24 Shared in volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 , Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 2 2 + i Length of study period, hrs: 0.25 i Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ' t c,base 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 t c,hv 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 P hv 0.01 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.02 0.02 0.02 t c,g 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t 3,1t 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 t c,T: 1 stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c 1 stage 4.1 4.1 7.6 6.6 7.0 7.5 6.5 6.9 Follow Up Time Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 t f,base 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 t f,HV 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 P hv 0.01 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.02 0.02 0.02 t f 2.2 2.2 3.6 4.1 3.4 3.5 4.0 3.3 Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations 1 Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 Conflicting Flows 228 42 Potential Capacity 763 1019 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 763 1019 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.94 Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 Conflicting Flows 455 84 Potential Capacity 1116 1518 _ Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1116 1518 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Maj. L Shared in. Prob. Queue Free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 Conflicting Flows 547 547 Potential Capacity 435 443 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 434 442 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 I 1 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 1 Conflicting Flows 504 319 Potential Capacity 442 610 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 1.00 1.00 Maj . L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.93 1.00 Movement Capacity 412 609 -- Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 v(vph) 3 73 66 r_ *1(vph) 1518 1116 412 434 763 609 442 1019 0.00 0.12 0.06 queue length Control Delay 7.4 11.7 8.8 LOS A B A proach Delay 10.3 proach LOS B 'cksheet 11 Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Rank 1 Delay Calculations 1 'vement 2 5 Dj 1.00 1.00 b it 132 24 V i2 0 0 L1 1700 1700 12 1700 1700 Oj 1.00 1.00 D maj left 7.4 0.0 N number major st lanes 2 2 Lay, rank 1 mvmts 0.0 0.0 • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1b TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: TJK r:\99165-60\HCS\6nga2pm.hcu Intersection: Lot 6 North Driveway / Garden Avenue North Count Date: 2000 Time Period: PM Peak Intersection Orientation: North-South Major St. 1 Vehicle Volume Data: ' - Movements: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Volume: 4 259 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 25 0 40 HFR: 4 267 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 27 0 44 PHF: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.91 0.91 0.91 PHV: 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.02 0.02 0.02 i Pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: Flow: Lane width: Walk speed: % Blockage: Median Type: None # of vehicles: 0 Flared approach Movements: # of vehicles: Eastbound 0 # of vehicles: Westbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y Y N N Y Y N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y Y N N Y Y N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R N N N N N N N N N _. Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: I Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y N N N N Y N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 l Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: 1 Northbound Southbound tared In volume, major th vehicles: 129 1 ,__;red lr; volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 1700 Ft flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 1 nber of major street through lanes: 2 2 Length of study period, hrs: 0.25 Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. ( Ltical Gap Calculations: 1 rement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 t c,base 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 t_ c,hv 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 I IV 0.03 0.25 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.02 0.02 0.02 I c,g 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 ✓ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t 3,1t 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 i c,T: stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c 1 stage 4.2 4.6 7.7 6.7 7.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 ]= Llow Up Time Calculations: I rement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 t. f,base 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 1- f,HV 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 iv 0.03 0.25 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.02 0.02 0.02 1_ f 2.2 2.5 3.6 4.1 3.4 3.5 4.0 3.3 rksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 ( iflicting Flows 134 3 1 :ential Capacity 860 1080 I lestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 860 1080 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.96 L_=p 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 C•^nflicting Flows 267 6 I :ential Capacity 1142 1606 I estrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1142 1606 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 1 j. L Shared ln. Prob. Queue Free St. 1.00 1.00 • Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 ( aflicting Flows 281 281 1 tential Capacity 604 626 L_5estrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 602 624 Dbability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 i Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 0 nflicting Flows 278 148 tential Capacity 627 806 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 1.00 1.00 I j. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 1.00 1.00 ( D. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.96 1.00 l__✓ement Capacity 600 804 I ii cksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 II ,, • v(vph) 4 27 44 C m(vph) 1606 1142 600 602 860 804 624 1080 v/c 0.00 0.03 0.04 95% queue length Control Delay 7.2 9.6 '8.5 LOS A A A Approach Delay 8.9 Approach LOS A Worksheet 11 Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Rank 1 Delay Calculations Movement 2 5 P of 1.00 1.00 j ✓ it 129 1 ✓ i2 0 0 S i1 1700 1700 S i2 1700 1700 P* Oj 1.00 1.00 D maj left 7.2 0.0 N number major st lanes 2 2 Delay, rank 1 mvmts 0.0 0.0 APPENDIX F Queue Calculation Sheets I Lake Washington Blvd./Park Drive/Garden Avenue ( ! i ' clo ENTRANO° DATA INPUT FORM FOR DETERMINING QUEUE LENGTH PROJECT: BOEING PARKING LOT 3B PROJECT NUMBER: 99165-60 PEAK HOUR:AMI PEAK HOUR 1 ANALYSIS YEAR 2000 WITH LOT 6, SOUTHPORT AND STONEWAY NORTH/SOUTH STREET: LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD/GARDEN AVENUE N EAST/WEST STREET: PARK DRIVE CYCLE LENGTH: 120 AVE. 95% PEAK HOUR 95% QUEUE QUEUE VOLUME RED TIME AVERAGE CONFIDENCE LENGTH LENGTH MOVEMENT (Vehicles) (Seconds) (Vehicles) (Vehicles) (feet) (feet) NB RIGHT 22 112.0 1 2 25 50 NB RIGHT 23 112.0 1 2 25 50 NB RIGHT 23 112.0 1 2 25 50 SB LEFT 144 101.9 4 8 100 200 SB LEFT 144 101.9 4 8 100 200 SB RIGHT 1 1 336 70.2 7 11 175 275 EB LEFT 297 92.3 8 12 200 300 EB LEFT 1 298 92.3 8 12 200 300 EB THRU 122 39.1 1 3 25 75 EB RT-THRU 123 39.1 1 3 25 75 WB THRU 603 71.8 12 18 300 450 WB THRU 604 71.8 12 18 300 450 WB RIGHT 944 36.7 10 15 250 375 Note: All queues based on"red time formula assuming poisson distribution(ie.random arrivals). ' SP&SW AM lkwprk.xls i t , - C. E NT RANOO DATA INPUT FORM FOR DETERMINING QUEUE LENGTH PROJECT: BOEING PARKING LOT 3B PROJECT NUMBER: 99165-60 PEAK HOUR:AFTERNOON PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS YEAR: 2000 WITH LOT 6, SOUTHPORT AND STONEWAY NORTH/SOUTH STREET: LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD/GARDEN AVENUE N EAST/WEST STREET: PARK DRIVE , CYCLE LENGTH: 120 AVE. 95% PEAK HOUR 95% QUEUE QUEUE ` VOLUME RED TIME AVERAGE CONFIDENCE LENGTH LENGTH MOVEMENT (Vehicles) (Seconds) (Vehicles) (Vehicles) (feet) (feet) NB RIGHT 175 99.6 5 9 125 225 —, NB RIGHT 176 99.6 5 9 125 225 NB RIGHT 176 99.6 5 9 125 225 ' SB LEFT 327 91.8 8 13 200 325 SB LEFT 327 91.8 8 13 200 325 ,__; SB RIGHT 449 69.8 9 14 225 350 EB LEFT 174 102.0 5 9 125 225 1 EB LEFT 175 102.0 5 9 125 225 '- ' EB THRU 586 61.6 10 15 250 375 EB RT-THRU 586 61.6 10 15 250 375 j 1 WB THRU 418 84.6 10 15 250 375 WB THRU 419 84.6 10 15 250 375 - WB RIGHT 608 27.0 5 8 125 200 1 Note: All queues based on"red time"formula assuming poisson distribution(ie.random arrivals). I I , i SP&SW Afternoon lkwprk.xls f 3 4:300 , _I ENTRANOO ' DATA INPUT FORM FOR DETERMINING QUEUE LENGTH PROJECT: BOEING PARKING LOT 3B I PROJECT NUMBER: 99165-60 -, PEAK HOUR: PM;PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS YEAR; 2000 WITH LOT 6, SOUTHPORT AND STONEWAY NORTH/SOUTH STREET: LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD/GARDEN AVENUE N ' 1 EAST/WEST STREET: PARK DRIVE CYCLE LENGTH:: 120 AVE. 95% PEAK HOUR 95% QUEUE QUEUE I VOLUME RED TIME AVERAGE CONFIDENCE LENGTH LENGTH - ' MOVEMENT (Vehicles) (Seconds) (Vehicles) (Vehicles) (feet) (feet) NB RIGHT 137 102.5 4 7 100 175 NB RIGHT 137 102.5 4 7 100 175 NB RIGHT 137 102.5 4 7 100 175 I SB LEFT 420 84.6 10 15 250 375 SB LEFT 420 84.6 10 15 250 375 SB RIGHT i423 57.5 7 11 175 275 EB LEFT 238 97.0 6 11 150 275 EB LEFT 239 97.0 6 11 150 275 EB THRU 292 65.9 5 9 125 225 EB RT-THRU 292 65.9 5 9 125 225 WB THRU 1 274 94.0 7 12 175 300 WB THRU 275 94.0 7 12 175 300 WB RIGHT 546 32.0 5 . 9 125 225 Note: All queues based on"red time"formula assuming poisson distribution(ie.random arrivals). - SP&SW PM lkwprk.xls • I C. E NT RANOO DATA INPUT FORM FOR DETERMINING QUEUE LENGTH PROJECT: BOEING PARKING LOT 3B PROJECT NUMBER: 99165-60 PEAK HOUR: AM PEAK HOUR ' ANALYSIS YEAR: 2000 WITH LOT 3B, SOUTHPORT AND STONEWAY NORTH/SOUTH STREET: LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD/GARDEN AVENUE N EAST/WEST STREET: PARK DRIVE CYCLE LENGTH: 120 AVE. 95% PEAK HOUR 95% QUEUE QUEUE VOLUME RED TIME AVERAGE CONFIDENCE LENGTH LENGTH , 1 MOVEMENT (Vehicles) (Seconds) (Vehicles) (Vehicles) (feet) (feet) NB RIGHT 19 112.4 1 2 25 50 NB RIGHT 19 112.4 1 2 25 50 NB RIGHT 19 112.4 1 2 25 50 SB LEFT 144 102.0 4 8 100 200 SB LEFT 144 102.0 4 8 100 200 SB RIGHT 336 70.4 7 11 175 275 EB LEFT 297 92.4 8 12 200 300 EB LEFT 298 92.4 8 12 200 300 EB THRU 124 38.6 1 3 25 75 EB RT-THRU 125 38.6 1 3 25 75 WB THRU 615 71.2 12 18 300 450 WB THRU 616 71.2 12 18 300 450 WB RIGHT 920 36.6 9 15 225 375 Note: All queues based on"red time"formula assuming poisson distribution(ie.random arrivals). SP&SW AM-WP lkwprk.xls 1 - GI, E NT RANOO DATA INPUT FORM FOR DETERMINING QUEUE LENGTH PROJECT: BOEING PARKING LOT 3B 1 PROJECT NUMBER: 99165-60 PEAK HOUR: AFTERNOON PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS YEAR: 2000 WITH LOT 3B, SOUTHPORT AND STONEWAY NORTH/SOUTH STREET: LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD/GARDEN AVENUE N EAST/WEST STREET: PARK DRIVE - CYCLE LENGTH:' 120 AVE. 95% PEAK HOUR 95% QUEUE QUEUE VOLUME RED TIME AVERAGE CONFIDENCE LENGTH LENGTH '_ MOVEMENT (Vehicles) (Seconds) (Vehicles) (Vehicles) (feet) (feet) NB RIGHT 131 103.2 4 7 100 175 NB RIGHT 132 103.2 4 7 100 175 NB RIGHT 132 103.2 4 7 100 175 SB LEFT 327 91.6 8 13 200 325 SB LEFT 327 91.6 8 13 200 325 SB RIGHT 449 69.5 9 14 225 .350 EB LEFT 174 101.9 5 9 125 225 EB LEFT 175 101.9 5 9 125 225 EB THRU 650 58.2 11 16 275 400 EB RT-THRU 650 58.2 11 16 275 400 WB THRU 461 81.4 10 16 250 400 WB THRU 461 81.4 10 16 250 400 WB RIGHT 523 27.1 4 7 100 175 I Note: All queues based on"red time formula assuming poisson distribution(ie.random arrivals). i SP&SW Afternoon-WP lkwprk.xls i I t_ I (IP ENTRANCO DATA INPUT FORM FOR DETERMINING QUEUE LENGTH PROJECT: BOEING PARKING LOT 3B PROJECT NUMBER: 99165-60 PEAK HOUR: PM PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS YEAR: 2000 WITH LOT 3B, SOUTHPORT AND STONEWAY NORTH/SOUTH STREET: LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD/GARDEN AVENUE N EAST/WEST STREET: PARK DRIVE CYCLE LENGTH: 120 AVE. 95% PEAK HOUR 95% QUEUE QUEUE VOLUME RED TIME AVERAGE CONFIDENCE LENGTH LENGTH MOVEMENT (Vehicles) (Seconds) (Vehicles) (Vehicles) (feet) (feet) NB RIGHT 126 103.3 4 7 100 175 NB RIGHT 126 103.3 4 7 100 175 NB RIGHT 127 103.3 4 7 100 175 SB LEFT 420 84.5 10 15 250 375 SB LEFT 420 84.5 10 15 250 375 ' SB RIGHT 423 57.2 7 11 175 275 EB LEFT 238 96.8 6 11 150 275 EB LEFT 239 96.8 6 11 150 275 EB THRU 304 65.3 6 10 150 250 EB RT-THRU 305 65.3 6 10 150 250 WB THRU 281 93.5 7 12 175 300 WB THRU 281 93.5 7 12 175 300 WB RIGHT 532 32.2 5 . 9 125 225 Note: All queues based on"red time"formula assuming poisson distribution(ie.random arrivals). I 1 SP&SW PM-WP Ikwprk.xls 1 r Park Avenue/North 10th Street i 411113110 1 E NT RANOO DATA INPUT FORM FOR DETERMINING QUEUE LENGTH PROJECT: BOEING PARKING LOT 3B PROJECT NUMBER: 99165-60 1 PEAK HOUR:AMIPEAK HOUR ANALYSIS YEAR: 2000 WITH LOT 6, SOUTHPORT AND STONEWAY NORTH/SOUTH STREET: PARK AVENUE EAST/WEST STREET: N 10TH STREET CYCLE LENGTH: 120 1 AVE. 95% PEAK HOUR 95% QUEUE QUEUE VOLUME RED TIME AVERAGE CONFIDENCE LENGTH LENGTH MOVEMENT (Vehicles) (Seconds) (Vehicles) (Vehicles) (feet) (feet) NB LEFT 21 111.2 0 1 0 25 NB THRU 460 54.1 7 11 175 275 NB THRU-RIGHT; 461 54.1 7 11 175 275 SB LEFT 12 111.2 0 1 0 25 SB THRU 647 54.1 10 15 250 375 SB THRU 648 54.1 10 15 250 375 SB RIGHT 98 30.4 1 2 25 50 EB LEFT 26 100.3 1 2 25 50 EB LEFT-THRU-RIGHT 30 100.3 1 2 25 50 WB LEFT-THRU-RIGHT 16 110.3 1 2 25 50 Note: All queues based on"red time"formula assuming poisson distribution(ie.random arrivals). 1 SP&SW AM prk010.xls , s_ , - CP ENTRANCO DATA INPUT FORM FOR DETERMINING QUEUE LENGTH PROJECT: BOEING PARKING LOT 3B PROJECT NUMBER: 99165-60 PEAK HOUR: AFTERNOON PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS YEAR: 2000 WITH LOT 6, SOUTHPORT AND STONEWAY NORTH/SOUTH STREET: PARK AVENUE EAST/WEST STREET: N 10TH STREET CYCLE LENGTH: 120 AVE. 95% PEAK HOUR 95% QUEUE QUEUE VOLUME RED TIME AVERAGE CONFIDENCE LENGTH LENGTH MOVEMENT (Vehicles) (Seconds) (Vehicles) (Vehicles) (feet) (feet) NB LEFT 55 112.9 1 2 25 50 NB THRU 535 66.8 10 15 250 375 NB THRU-RIGHT 535 66.8 10 15 250 375 SB LEFT 16 112.9 0 1 0 25 SB THRU 625 66.8 12 17 300 425 SB THRU 626 66.8 12 17 300 425 SB RIGHT 94 29.6 1 2 25 50 EB LEFT 291 86.8 7 12 175 300 EB LEFT-THRU-RIGHT 307 86.8 7 12 175 300 WB LEFT-THRU-RIGHT 45 109.4 1 4 25 100 Note: All queues based on red time"formula assuming poisson distribution(ie.random arrivals). i SP&SW AFTERNOON prk010.xls r E NT RANOO DATA INPUT FORM FOR DETERMINING QUEUE LENGTH PROJECT: BOEING PARKING LOT 3B PROJECT NUMBER: 99165-60 PEAK HOUR: PM!PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS YEAR: 2000 WITH LOT 6, SOUTHPORT AND STONEWAY NORTH/SOUTH STREET: PARK AVENUE EAST/WEST STREET: N 10TH STREET CYCLE LENGTH: 120 AVE. 95% PEAK HOUR 95% QUEUE QUEUE VOLUME RED TIME AVERAGE CONFIDENCE LENGTH LENGTH MOVEMENT (Vehicles) (Seconds) (Vehicles) (Vehicles) (feet) (feet) NB LEFT 20 111.2 0 1 0 25 NB THRU 515 57.2 8 13 200 325 NB THRU-RIGHT' 515 57.2 8 13 200 325 SB LEFT 5 111.2 0 1 0 25 SB THRU 585 57.2 9 15 225 375 SB THRU 585 57.2 9 15 225 375 SB RIGHT 29 31.7 0 1 0 25 EB LEFT 115 98.4 3 6 75 150 EB LEFT-THRU-RIGHT 121 98.4 3 7 75 175 WB LEFT-THRU-RIGHT 24 109.1 1 2 25 50 Note: All queues based on"red time"formula assuming poisson distribution(ie.random arrivals). I , SP&SW PM p rk010.xls i CP E NT RANOO DATA INPUT FORM FOR DETERMINING QUEUE LENGTH PROJECT: BOEING PARKING LOT 3B i j PROJECT NUMBER: 99165-60 PEAK HOUR: AM PEAK HOUR - 1' ANALYSIS YEAR: 2000 WITH LOT 3B, SOUTHPORT AND STONEWAY NORTH/SOUTH STREET: PARK AVENUE EAST/WEST STREET: N 10TH STREET CYCLE LENGTH: 120 AVE. 95% PEAK HOUR 95% QUEUE QUEUE VOLUME RED TIME AVERAGE CONFIDENCE LENGTH LENGTH MOVEMENT (Vehicles) (Seconds) (Vehicles) (Vehicles) (feet) (feet) NB LEFT 21 111.4 0 1 0 25 NB THRU 459 54.8 7 12 175 300 1 NB THRU-RIGHT 459 54.8 7 12 175 300 SB LEFT 36 111.4 0 2 0 50 SB THRU 646 54.8 10 15 250 375 SB THRU 647 54.8 10 15 250 375 SB RIGHT 98 31.3 1 3 25 75 EB LEFT 26 100.4 1 2 25 50 EB LEFT-THRU-RIGHT 30 100.4 1 2 25 50 WB LEFT-THRU-RIGHT 24 109.4 1 2 25 50 Note: All queues based on"red time"formula assuming poisson distribution(ie.random arrivals). 1 SP&SW AM-WP P rk010.xls , 4:3, ' E NT RANCO DATA INPUT FORM FOR DETERMINING QUEUE LENGTH , PROJECT: BOEING PARKING LOT 3B PROJECT NUMBER: 99165-60 PEAK HOUR:AFTERNOON PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS YEAR: 2000 WITH LOT 3B, SOUTHPORT AND STONEWAY NORTH/SOUTH STREET: PARK AVENUE EAST/WEST STREET: N 10TH STREET CYCLE LENGTH: 120 AVE. 95% PEAK HOUR 95% QUEUE QUEUE ' VOLUME RED TIME AVERAGE CONFIDENCE LENGTH LENGTH MOVEMENT (Vehicles) (Seconds) (Vehicles) (Vehicles) (feet) (feet) NB LEFT 55 113.5 1 3 25 75 NB THRU 562 71.6 11 17 275 425 NB THRU-RIGHT' 563 71.6 11 17 275 425 SB LEFT 83 113.5 1 4 25 100 SB THRU 624 71.6 12 18 300 450 SB THRU 625 71.6 12 18 300 450 SB RIGHT 94 37.3 1 3 25 75 EB LEFT 291 89.6 7 12 175 300 EB LEFT-THRU-RIGHT 307 89.6 8 12 200 300 WB LEFT-THRU-RIGHT 141 101.2 4 8 100 200 Note: All queues based on'red time"formula assuming Poisson distribution(ie.random arrivals). - SP&SW AFTERNOON-WP prk070.xls i I I CP ENTRANCO DATA INPUT FORM FOR DETERMINING QUEUE LENGTH PROJECT: BOEING PARKING LOT 3B PROJECT NUMBER: 99165-60 PEAK HOUR: PM PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS YEAR: 2000 WITH LOT 3B, SOUTHPORT AND STONEWAY , NORTH/SOUTH STREET: PARK AVENUE EAST/WEST STREET: N 10TH STREET CYCLE LENGTH: 120 AVE. 95% PEAK HOUR 95% QUEUE QUEUE VOLUME RED TIME AVERAGE CONFIDENCE LENGTH LENGTH MOVEMENT (Vehicles) (Seconds) (Vehicles) (Vehicles) (feet) (feet) NB LEFT 20 111.5 0. 1 0 25 NB THRU 519 58.9 9 14 225 350 NB THRU-RIGHT 520 58.9 9 14 225 350 SB LEFT 19 111.5 0 1 0 25 SB THRU 585 58.9 10 15 250 375 SB THRU 585 58.9 10 15 250 375 SB RIGHT 29 34.0 0 1 0 25 EB LEFT 115 99.0 3 6 75 150 EB LEFT-THRU-RIGHT 121 99.0 3 7 75 175 WB LEFT-THRU-RIGHT 48 106.6 1 4 25 100 Note: All queues based on"red time"formula assuming poisson distribution(ie.random arrivals). I i 1 I- SP&SW PM-WP prk010.xls , D4 • 5 T23N R5E W 1/2 . e. e e \ e • • ', ....--- ...........- C OR / r, . ........., 1 ;.., : ,, 900 , / „,,,,. / ,,,/ ,v- , , , • r , \ . N., \ \-A _ \ ,, ..., \ , \ \ \ \c--- --" \ \ \ \ , \ \ \--'---- R\ , ,\ \ / A .., ....•\ . . . . . , ),.V .-''•' \ \ „„\ 1.. „...... ,.... ,.\:,,_•...._. . . ,,... .. , ,\\,\ . ..... . . ., ,., . ,....„.. ,. ,\ .\. . . / IH / \ \. ///I ,H// ,/,' . — ____ , --. \ \ , \ \ z . \. ; i i ..<%. •Z . , i I .-, ccs ,,, ,,, / 1 N 8th St.\ . 1 e4 — ' H • . , t.,.. z C 0 C. ba • Of Q3 I crs tai) i - - • o H . „ . , . . ' I i • • .._ I , .... . N 6th S-. ri-; • II-1 IHF..,,_ ce .1 .1 __ -..,_ z • cie-7. . :V:7 913. - CO 6 \ \\ \\\\ Im-.> !'›.' • ---- > . _„ ,. --------- o, 77 77.— 1 , ! • --•44-, • ' I 1_,-;ti) co — •-, !lz. / I- .7.) yr- -- ce a. • -. , i ..._._ '0 0 0- - - - • -,4 •,I 4,1 •-l- --- / V ' -- ., /7 -87— ) *71. ,,., -34k4 7-cir4 cp ,-:., i---- ..,..„ ;,.._ •._--s,—'- R-10 ix- / LP.4,- --co-L-03 -Co,co w -,2 —. F4 • 17 T23N R5E W 1/2 N.'v o E4 c'ey ZONING 144800 , * P/EVPW TECHNICAL SERVICES 8 T23N R5E W 1/2 \ . • . V,I.A.4,t1R1—r itAiisc11—I SG