Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA99-157 • • °' 'PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN— Tx__ \ .•, LEGEND _gam ' STANDARD KPHLLi D.MIN' �L cc :� I I j P i ; //_... __ —_ A k_..-�- ROAACI- . \ \\ CONCRETE PANFYFM L I •( �Q5 'E EASFYEM � VELEME ----� .-. -'�'�R\ /-'� I �2i\�t' PROPOSED CURD I]®GUTTER .-..a_ ___- _--.- -. \ I ''''''NO CURB..CUTTER • P(�G E S NC ED'POW R \\ \\ Li Z n G G6T -ARE1` muaPORMPR, \ of \\ �.H _\��CJ REc NO seum9sL: -"./___-. nrA�. R n_i \\��- \ \ s \ O O / � - n n�Am-i,FaR ANE KD G R:'' •` .. �iK01ANORSPIGNPE EE A0P/ TOR EN t-MK N UNE\\-nn.—FASdEMOWm� �' � CL 2 __ _ AEC 0 9012171851 (/ 0 O co Q K O _- ,,•�,''• IUMBER - - --_ [• _ _ENCLOSURE \ CONGEIE \ •/' a \ `1-w�WP-4- • \� _ • • , O •/ I OFF_LOADING — LF- 0 -y,\ \. r LL W 3 0¢ .D.P1NG WETNNINO W PROPOSED ME �� =_ - // \ �� W°fET°wrote ,(p� \''.- -' -::: .: S 3 O O..3 4.1 ALONG BENSON (S' ILL. HYDRANT PP.) \ • A( -_ CC CO - O Z I- &OPES DUE M STEEP ,(� <:F. ' UNDSI' EKG I 1 ' ' ,\ PROPoSm O p w o N 6P 10. • , —/ I� 1 e \\v mosN.0 z lL / 0 W , ROPOSED ABE .v '.sAd A ,♦ �\ ,{ 0\ $ _ j c /�,, LANDSCAPE oxNicnoxs �'_He.s� ZS �.� \\ iovuExr �� W//\/` 38 ho� 9as'x ' G/ dida TyEypAIjEEppT "`•c`, Tz'•— \ G''2w\'G m6sH S� ' owERExr51INc���p 3 177 r 31]1ER GPoSEYExr` ' b r ,0645\ \ EASEMEM \ EvmYc 10•sua se, ` '9:.JI\ �'• F'F.=36.00 •, .� ' \(SEWER EASEMENT 982171951 la 11114 DUSTING - PER BG mi A-NWTe'R D s /� P LL z o' e.My� Dal A {� 4 \� * PARCEL \ \ C.FAJa GUI2FA/ • , Z e.Uw \� % °soar Iii alb kN-'� I \ \ \v '�' 2 • • ,ivatiailliumRa. / WFY LTTwWpp Z rnaE • , N50' _ 56 \ \ �/0' / / IME,(KbAEM� ~ EL Q e ql 6V \� �_ ( VOS NE -- 02 I IN ''�71\ \• \ \ // t W CO I~�L1 z I�M lTP.I . , sm+D' 4 O 3 GE / \� 01 ]'i 1� 1$ a ♦ 9 NEW.m/ Goi�IEIYD O (0, INN C 5�,, A. • POsm H E\ ` IA i�� W � �`� m.� ARSE °' '�.1141/' / i��oE xor P/{nnano . . is 1 g \ / p . • RIG MRN F ii' , Y -v a,Mar a F EN. E _ r 11QR �w W�N,Di t \\119LWOSGP eB 'g I ,[V� 02Gg j19 RI.R,x 21 21 - , /4 : 7:77 F“-r-) 'F' . AND GUT. �� A� ------- -- "ti -_ _ `+ ©1 r�'�. lI ,1 5.CR VN e a SHE DATA "° c �` RD `` fyf /1 w xm Rn P o1 us�ae Jy A @d, PROPOSED CURB '" dillir SITE AREA 1598 AC •• P.P. -' P:,•.' _�.— „ ' . _ ,1 HOME GS/S PIXEL MIR tOAe AO -'B ----. e/LANE RGWxYEM �� �� Swnma PARCEL i10 AC. _ ~, /-IXb'nxG -A THE BNLDNGS/STR1Cro ER w,DSGwE 4'// TIE HOME DEP. 11,,06a SF PROPOSED FLAIR! _ // // Isl. I,I� x\ THE HOME DEPOT O RDEN CENTER 1,790 UDAB,G HOWL - .- / 4, INDEX A��s]ON[lIE[���y¢ Vbe v.,,,,,= TOTAL 131ASN SF 4 BNIDwEa So FEET _ O 0plpxc 21B1Cx5 REDNJdR 12.0R MK OMNI PROPDSF]) 38 FEB TO Raa DECK - ` � 1. SITE P. I EUIREs of-o]-ol ...so FpCY i FROM GMDY WA .1.. /OPMUGE PVN WOUND AREAS: SEE PUN _ z urr Pux 10• u TALBOT Rao N. TREE RnElFnon/GEf xc PLAN CffY OF RENTON • Id Ou BENSON ROD kEWWm'KaLYLS: - ® •'� CEPARTMExfF of PUBLIC WORK8 oy BIII10IN0 SETB,LIFS PROPOSED: 52'PROM BENSON R/W(E PO 1S]Ias1 sr .I srNEs/1.am sF.um)-sn ulx. [ F.,' S]'FROM N.0. J1,651 Y a s STILS/ A00 SP.1lx%)-659 YA%. M.FROM PROPOSED S.0. P 612 (]9 Oi OIRDOOR SGSDNLL SNFS KG) _ Q 2AV ROM GRKT MAT RAY WOMB SURFACE KEK: 0]] AG.00.25((HOPE DEPOT PARCEL KCESSBt£Aa STN15 RmVIRER 12 \ Z �� HY➢PKf NPEAWOUS MI VA 1A] AC..28.05:(SWMERN PARLm)) ��SfI115 PROWOm:12 \ m n DMOUS SURFACE KFAS: IN AC.(roTAL) STNL"E' m'WfM 25''LL 90' () LaDOFG SPACQ W'Uu0m VYDING(GRWIND LENFL) = LwOSWwC/PEN SIREEET.11.05 MOM Y 65'x I55'LOADPG/MN1UflRRWG(DOCK-HORN) \ re aem, n .On wre - .�.��W— P•va[ 10/.x/�9 �� 7 SRsAO0/00.010 LOT ADO SF.(N.1000 SF BIOPRTUTIOx) 1 REWSE/RESUBWi 12/I/99 K W PT/01PERAWS SIMILES U NAi1®LIMA 56.OW iF. ewe a es+ � s•4 00 Flb:P:\SOSMPRO.1\625a\ENGMEERING\625a-ADWG Dele/rMe:n2/01/1999 12 41 Rare:1-50 Bons.M.. Z625a-B.26R5a-5.2625ai. ���� rum.. m.�/m/mVmm y/,w na.wrt MM no,star m vxsx snsx m su !CB Kr ew <e ea — v ""`® ""` '�" ':': HOME DEPOT STORE "" ,�_�® CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON , ilk ±lam RENTON • I . ,. I ,E23 PIN ing/Balding/Puerc Wane De I. GRADING AND NO. REVISION BY DATE APPR ��o• Cregg Zimmerman P.E,Adminislmtor DRAINAGE PLAN w \ • • A\ /e e 31< � \ N�; ,. I• F--�dL. "� +11r am \ 11 6 \o °', ; o 3 ;k, ,:_,,,,,,,,„ :,,,,,.,,,,„ ,,:,:.:::., ,., ,_ •71-.\;.• s'' 20' \ \ P \,, ,:k.,;_ .‘k %11. —§ s.. II 1 \ �, ;\ . 11/ �i ! ' - ( iA��4 � t � 1, 1 • I g \\} �'� � ,� / ' � �, a / /ll '1�� , e/1�.`'I I'��t�� ��s� I �� ; � ' '` �;Ojw TyAy<1 ::r:\ 1 ■6%����t'::he• I• 'fly/,��:tlI0-"<mDrIl- i _ ■i• ; A,i� _ � _ Y= .. iI N I i , =•c' � A 'qq;I , m j ' ' ( 1 'fid ay o; ';i ;1 1 , ( : l . lAF 110 tir' l'iY if -I I I i • �, p S /• '%j+/' ;/ 111E 6fL �p� ',,\-t;C \\,i�l`.VC �l�: \/(( II5IIIIZP ' '?�Z Ili illi It, I g I/' ' 1 ,I . , 193•�J \ \ \ \ 111 1\il\\* • = Y li p /[ I y 2 • . :.• .. \Iiii \''II11 I` 31 / ,/ JLwT �/ ---- I'� �;�—-fit :;•'/ • o (I 111 r'l l lu tcn • �\ i ,� It* I I II k\r111 \ \o' Z l m;: '!''' �= ._s" era e� a • 7—I—' `\\\L-n\\\\\\\\\ V,4;,M „17- ;i - A,r,N o 1 -j- - _„1,1 .L► 4 \ �\`\\\\\\\\\\\\ .) rc \`\I IIU/Illlo� ,� --,s •1 /X . -_xe--- a I III 1 I P j 1 11(/il .. : `;' ' • S° � —I �,1 \\ .\\\\I\IIII\\\ j f l �,, , . 4 _- :-.� _• ;kr __— ' T�� ��► �; \ \\1111111\11\', e/ / '�^'�,:'.:'=� ¢`° J %� Q ,.,�, :3 f (��� I IIII I I I I I\11 111\' ..,� �,A .\- I(IO rI I�/ir�lifllllillllul`. Mil. 4 • / $ .5 1 1/lnlllhll'/ /((c'\ \: \ \ I G ice, �k�r'll/lllll/Illlll\\ » , � ,� `A_• % • , ////14f11111(I(111II \ �``:�' / '_ ', IN ,11111111\I Ill 11111111 �� '.a( Pl I \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\I / �, '( , \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\II\\ § i \ \\ 3; ..o .� \ I \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\I\\\I \� _ 111\\\\\\\\\\I\ \ MATCHLINE kbgg o / /_ / \II\\\\%\\\`\\\\\ I\ � � jl \lI "� 11 1\ ��� , , \111 \, \ / p ` /` , u 7, (h \11\)\)\lllll//llll l 11e1 \9 •. / o \\ If111/1/Il//o \�� \ \ l ' 1l l II � r Illlllll/l ,1,,�— // / I /////////////m wD s s,p"sy \ \\ e - 16/ \(\*ll I/lll/lll11 Is O ` • ' 1 \ \- IIiIlllo 'o '' a, a \ \ — \\ ,-- o �\� \ \ .\ AACHLINE• ffa 11 3:1 V FOR: TITLE: z PC'Hq-S 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH GRADING/DRAINAGE i gg a £ mP wit ty KENT WA 9803z HOME DEPOT USA,INC. A O -C Via'_ (a25)251-6222 3800 WEST CHAPMAN AVENUE FOR HOME DEPOT,INC. • ro v _� (azs)zs:-e78z FAX S.W.GRADY WAY e 0 �//�11r - ORANGE,CA 95868 a i °G1r1N NE'� URJEEN6 EEIMRONUUEMu EERYIINCES RENTON,WASHINGTON e Exc. B.C.E.JOB NO. 6254 a"I.m. ak . ® m 50 mm ., £ RENTON. WASHINGTON CITY OF HOME DEPOT STORE '„ — RENTON - ':�e� n Plaaq/BPAttAg/PuEl.c works Dep+. LANDSCAPE PLAN N0. RENSION .T'By- DATE APPR PAP.. ®• ', Gregg Zimmeeman P.E.,AEminlatrotor ,,....:•.. . • :,/;-N. , it \\,,I.,kL,,,,...:,,,,..,,,,,;',.:•,,.,44..fr,'(11411: 1\.:„.:.).41`1...:::,:\-\")\,.s..s\,: :\:\__, \ 11'-7-AIIN S ,pp yap l 1 JJ\\ °°s.I J ��� � J II ��� ‹'P`k o tot..,r , I'''r �i ��- t�r 1 iii gR Pk ��JJ( "{a'ei� ..k\ \, \�����\ .y '� mil ' I + dP j r 1��, , a / • II , a l pl. I C� ®:IV rn iL a m �` 'F1r\ ' i''P ° j I r r�� �'!' IfP ? ,o p4 +I11 Z �l fig-tit ��;+1 1G � `\'' \ vim_ t A+'a 'B!�l LEI I�I 1� .t;. f.. .S.iimu r:` ,:\ IRS ,I III(Ma/il1/II f j`'II.l'� V P` ► s • r,4rI(l,)I,ra::y' Ili I Ql kli, CT �� •�=4 \- illl 11¢\ I I 11\\\\ 1? ,11 I I Z U gyrta.r _ _ I K-. 0) I I ,.,, r E<:''I /I �� 11• '.,a• BQ SF:. 1 :- U •;„.g'it 1, ((.11it_ii) {L 1m ;,Ii Ill I!. �' ��c� �-1 1g i • \\. •'� ,llll�`=(1��... (y/� 1 N�'�y f.° AIM 1 I -.! l �r►�asar8tai7 11(` 1«�)Pi il3'41, :,, • 1! � it k \\\ \\ \\\\\\MI' 'I\,1 k : \ , I r ----ij II 1'.).row -11 I1\11 ''W2 1111 / 9 / :?,' /� -- \ 1 a ����Ir.. �,I >I I I I'�))1� 11p mat Psi I<D 1, d I '\ OP ♦-. �_ P tO: y 11--11 ,,.y•a o -.\..\\„'111�11\\ In'I },'ve',°gt ,. ..1 c /, ,,. I, II111\I\II nn','i�,',,f r ' M . �\ ;� 9) �,e.1/j,�® '<.. I } r ��,,,' :.�� ,I��I1I,�II'I'I1IIIi��11111 £�• s;�gp--A ► %1 ra -�•,- • °'iiii',ii I11Innl\ d R5 I t. �"r rc ��O�,o,V � .F�'` i ii��Ar�- * ^� !il°d'1111r,1 I" I' 1\, o. c #( 4 9 a , N''l, '(1111111�11/� \ . tp'"g*a_>,, ot? ig•1 r J �'q ,en,('l�I I 1 III y`Y'f t '-,tu V p ,\ 1`6:C•i;,w\ \ \�',I\ ,,t\\\0I11111 1, \\ JR •'I (' 1�\'\\\'1\,\\01'•1\1�I,11 • •`\\/ r (/ I'% \'I \, �1.\\\i`)jIi11,,„ i ,_ \ \ \ 1 , / 1.1. ,11I'1`\•\\\11'Illldl Q it, - y 1 Willi/MI \ 1 IIII III W I `' \ 1 / III ,,,,,,i,,, hl z /(•Q�a/pp --,.\\- \ ./ / / i l•;;1,,,,,'li fr'I,,„ , f1 s4 V",. , = .,/ /i. '(C�\v Ii)i�,,,,111(Il is �O \ `C-- ,/ 9\\\;11'i J'il IIll�lilklll. ! TITLE: LOCATION: g _�,,,,..,. HOME DEPOT S.W.GRADY WAY I� We I GIr � 3800 WEST CHAPMAN AVENUE RENTON,WASHINGTON a +. 8 I.�..w.e,. n ORANGE,CA 95868 ' N N S 7.S= .1�a s'1a fml i3 B.C.E.JOB NO. 6254 0 • 70 SS %, 110 SS 1 2S-0. Y-0"•wo-NIE914.1 fi Se-0. POINCIALL1 MYNA= , imrii- irm 101 illioaDui, ',.,. v2GDODI ER-3,Sr2k11, 0-3.,KT11 q i 7, , 11114; LoLkil I-A L _1 • TOOL RENTAL CENTER SIGN r— —i .-,, 1 I WASHINGTON'S HOME IMPROVEMENT WAREHOUSE -r,, ir, 90 I IRLI:4 SF L- BUILDING SIGN CM WM Ili,145 Sr Ir-e" ^.. .7. NI s tiVA'It g ",4,01. raraic 10) . ® =a& NURSERY ' 11 111111111.M........... 11111 1 • 1 1 INDOOR LUMBER YARD /---- •••.• ... :.• _._ SONL C.0.41E0 so.ny f131003!AMC '.t '• vas rvw manrcuzu 'MN WW2 Ant`cema MONUMENT SIGN ELEVA11014 i: -..;'''',:: :<."'' -::=;:- .'.••::.:':-,::::.: •: ''.. ,,,,., ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,'.,,. ••-•,,;.,,,.e,.1.,:,,,?.,,,,•,.,:, .-,. GARDEN CENTER SIGNAGE LUMBER ENTRANCE:,SIONAGE v !,.. ';•:.•-,--• ve,-.• •. ..' ;1..'::'' '.....'''.'IX.!..:.;)i.I'' .. . .„. . • . . ......-. ',.'.'" ::.4,i,-H.l.:''-i•I''''''''''''.'''. . .., . ';,.,.,...,....1: ..::..A...‘.:Y'':',':' • .. '' .'.';.:!I.::'1••;•'?:,,I..j?.:e.,": •. . ..: ..- . . . . , •.. . .. .. . ' .. ... . • . . . . . , . . . . . . . , .“ . .. :, • . . . .. . . • THE HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. 12EMON, WA • - . •• , BASED ON SITE PLAN: #WA-131i INIIMI tRE=OMIE tal=1 illkillMATATIMIltill IIINIMI IliAM=ME11 Iltiffell MN lo =1111 15101 RED HILL AVENUE / SUITE 200 • 10 STIN. CALI FORN I A 92780 • TE L 714 •259 •0300 • FAX 714 • 259 •3 4 80 LEGEND 0 25 50 100 PRELIMINARY UTILITY' LAN LEGEND b PROPOSED WATER UNE PROPOSED FIRE MRAINt 1, \: la,r 1-1 —I----- I _ ------ /AD, SO'-' COMO WATER UNE --w--- ,.-P ''' '‘: te ''''.--.-".. ''-'\ --- ---\'--- ----q0-N.PIU. \ 7..........-.-,,'".-<----------1:.---- .".„ --'------------,. .:1 I \ - *.e IXISTIND FIRE VDDRANT PROPOSED SAN SEWER UNE ° " 1 !1 11 i PROPOSED SAN.SEWER IMBUE O Z I -COSTING SAN.SEP.UNE COSMO SAN.SEWER MANHOLE - -- g g .,„..--- -----.7"---- iir_ ....V. ,'r,..l,----"--..,-111-1'11— Tsmo.g, p ,se.\‘\\ "---r`'7'--''\'sg\7-„.,e--.,.. \.\,'...-.'2''':—.\--.\--,.--'\-•--\--,,-,,. \s'\, a..1i9OwM0 agg 0 o 8 5, , ----;•-•_..----..... 0- El3 _I •... \ 1' PROPOSED SOX 15—- •,-, sE,...2 F,I2 r \ fg DOUBLE DETECTOR 00 POW OF CONNECTOR ,' all , \, \SAN.EWER) %• ‘, \, i ., \ t• i '.- '\•\ ROPOSED SAW DW Ni ---. \ ' • CS 6 . a •• i :t:f b;'' -1 z > ,.: ...„....z 14 S!! ,---\,S, I < 0,3 \\\,,,\\\\ \, ,\ C° ,"i.,:..N,:r3E1;,1,.',7;,.':.:. • 5' (1(.3.• ,i F. 'D m• < co ., . . , • / .,-, ,,,,, m ,•,.,A,:4,.. -.. - m, ., ,,,,,,..*!,,,.,,.,....,,,:kt, , • ..,. . . al 0 ill 82 5 1 0 a 1-• z 4 II E g: ..-_, _ 1 • • ' ••''''------'-....--7,7'"',,_!,162--II-LMIII I O W c6 e.,-; ''s \ 1 I "'' '' . ., •,, -,. . I ..,, .,4. .,:';',. ' ,,I ,,ttr,;*.'-:i:-. • ------ - , OIL , i > \P ) . . sr-Tr-CZzit:V;_______, ,..,:,?,..71 .4.,...iOsE'-;igel-------- ' --I"- . co CO !-; ,..,7 , / i I ____ sr-z--,,INN.7-: -7414"W°.____ ,,,,,':,:..'.1. ."; ,.:'''.,.: rinorr MP.) C :::),-..-. I ME'r2'''' z II c0:, ,,--. PROPOSED ''s, \ lei f./ ' ---. MP ww.w.• P ,' • ' P ,, 7 / 1\I 1 1 1 ----- .. . ARCEL LINES il '' \ ---- • .-2,X'4'1‘, .'".:.:'LLI "' . • '- '-'.... ."._ Wo-C: -_) '---- ' \ '''' '''‘)./i:,,.){, ......, 2., ,.. „ • /-* 4 -x, / „ I — , , 1,11 ______,_ ____4___. 1.,,,. .. „--...____•_.? ---- ----i--- --J____ --------'----- ------- '\s ////', /://9,'7 / -----E::: 117,-.:: ----. .----- - . ---7-- --------- \ -'"1,,Z.- et , ,' -----e(-49 ' !:1 ' \ --i ^ ,'"--- --__L____ ----,___ --- 7/1 '..3 . ,, ----\---, -1-7,-7 `- 1:-:ii , --1----- -1-7'----- fi/7 .ffi ----7---- . - .., . , ,., .. , , . , ./ z'i __ 4, 4,1*//1/ / ; , "V"'7 g.''' I 5, , .‘ ,./ Li, ,Vv,/, 7 . ,,,--- •-4' ‘) \i,'. 1 _____k_. - ..- ,,,„,, . ,., _ _iv, ,'.-- -- ---i--- .. -:--, - 7,,z '''ft . /,• i• -ji --'-. --.<0.,,;- •v g •s ili . .......s 1 J 1 --__ __- ..i # .......„ i1 i i --,,,,-___,,,,,:- . ,_...: _... r.,.•• .,. .• , ... II i 1 1 1 I ij - . "'-------------- —:- . .• ' '— —T - — i i_J I ,, d''' ---------HI!,• ----:--------H- -----,------4---- .r''''''''' - i // -//'" / .' / ''',.'' i Xj,-,940 7. :. :., 1 1 1 'T. -----------z---- - ''''''' " : ' .'-:' '‘'*1:51**•-' '1"-L--- r 77 i // •••'' -----f-- /,'Y /7 ii CZ::D4-4 •Thi--- ----- I:. k' ../•'.' a '4Z-/ ,.. 1 :S,, VI'.s,c>,.,„,i;,. ;.," -----_________3 ___:_ ...al .,, 4 ,.........,___, .,_ _ —:----____. ----;.---int A-- ---- ^''''------ •f'-''' ..2 v:1:.7_,..- g a , 5 ----- ....... ,7--•---_-_,---. ---------.... .-.•• .- •--------,_, . .. ---.... .......„ , -4' 7 .------,--,,-.., ----....,,,.....1....,_..........._ F/' . ,i, .,./ 1 1 1 1 14,1 .,..6-,,, -7-'--------- -• - oamir° _,_ .1IP., --,__. ,......... ...---Z.,..,.4 •----------------- -------'-•:-; ' ----",...-...7.' —iff . 764// It ,I / ------:____.' _ LI" •,:";,./.'/ . II I S 04 A."' ----- -------,---____--.1,_ / -------____ '------. ._:._,..,,,:. . ' ,) /.•T/ . , m : - ,. ; •:” - .. 28327 N 0 ! '' Z 1 3 1' , - "X.-- .„... / -,, ------K.- ,,, `-- --• / : •)'-'--------,--_. , .fi_ \ •\,,, • ;-------- °c, / • O..,CITY OF RENTON 3 a OF PUBLIC WORKS ‘.0 DEsce.E0_- m 0 -) 1 .. .N........_ 0.— ,,,-. 0,,,, 99 FLE ui 4 4 oj 1 g r,re P\SOS.PROA625.1\EN.NEERING\6254-U OwG Date/line 10/29/1099 la 07 Scare 1.50 Bronx.xrela 2625.1-Bd6254-S.E625.1T. 3 • „, -OCT 27 '99 12:12 TO-9-4252518782 FROM-FIRST AMERICAN NATIONAL ACCOUNTS-SEATTLE T-740 P.02/03 F-075 • ., ,,-r2cr,., h,,^g �n. t ,Y e 1 l,Y;�'i: •ic y •sg•—•...h:... t147. �•t�`•; • ,.,0• ;,1 f Y -*p .dt t' ;y'� `�i `Z r A rW..tN Ail ; f A '/..TC-4 � "P.I. 4 y a , Ste`1 ,1 ,MT•;4,, ',,,e •` 1 t ] yy 'r++�f�\` 'T.,{=/(`��1 �yv” �_w.y* y 1. ♦�^4'71s y+A^= Ate! pt `. 1 J + Lit 1 ;�1� •', 1 I—el N .. +v,i;,!Fy.7".;•[. 1' t)/ �•4 �•�'4 �17, f i w � � J.. J' 3 � �J(/o�4 T it' .�a• Y ...•JS:-.'.2' �,�{. . '• - /�r <r .`R• � i. �x•• ..v.a^,.r.�(.` r �.f�jk� 1f. *y.'��aY Li-Ca-$1�'r'� t4, �'1y��3•,Z 4 " i,::;F3%n;'"1",,t';.: !:;•::; (rZf4, 1 :,1, • lA• •t +��'S�S y 1 �'- lef i,n:Ti * ,!!":Y4',, - 6 utiDi i/\ "'t' 1• ..,-••s '43, N!.i •� •.�';. , rx�;^_�: 3 :.�:���a',�'�i�` !n•1QOt•• .•ftho ' s- : ..;., .a, «J;,• .a;• :;.,� Lu {1,ttLN f ELAN. IN • CITY OF RENTON. PROJECT NAMES Home Depot mil" ^^ - APPLIt—ATION NO:,,I--ON .9 9 . I S1, S , v) ak ' 11 IL " The',a`.�,It►A IBA um of property awn=within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services - F ph/talon will notify these Individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRE88 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL • NUMDER RAMAC IiNC 3020 ISSAQUAH PINE LAKE RD S 172305-9017-01 . i ISSAQUAH, WA- 98029 7 77 AUTO "TUM DESIGN 900 S GRADY`WAY; 172305-9021-05 ' 4' % RENTON, WA, 98055' CITY JF RENTON 200 MILI,. AVE S 172305-9023-03 i RENTON, WA' .98055 EL HARAWY • PO -BOX 2561 172305-9054-05 GI 1GUIS K & AUBURN, WA 98071 723150-1570-03-001 & —002 HI -LDY S CHRRYSLER REALTY 800 CHRYSLER DR ' , •182305-9069-07 C RPORATION AUBURN HILLS, MI 48326 '. KINLOW BENJAMIN M 4310 NE 5TH ST APT B104 • • - 182305-9078-06 .. & PATRICIA RENTON, WA 98059 • F'RIEDgAN HENRY ' 8803 SE 78TH ST 182305-9136-06 is SANDRA MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 MOFFATT ROBERT L 3709 MEADOW AVE N . •182305-9137-05 ... RENTON, WA 98056 UNIVERSITY STREET PO BOX 811097 192305-9001-07 ' PROPERTIES CHICAGO, IL 60681 192305-9023-01 • ATLANTIC RICHFIELD PO, BOX 512485 . . 192305-9070-03 • COMPANY LOS ANGELES, CA 90051 • RENTON FUEL 4509 116TH AVE SE 192305-9092-07 COMPANY LLC• BELLEVUE, WA 98006 915460-0005-07, 915460-0170-06 PUGET SOUND PO BOX 90868 • • 192305-9094-05 ENERGY/ELEC BELLEVUE, WA 98009 - 202305-9005-00,9008-07,9028-03, 9146-00 ( page 1 of 2 (Attach additional sheets,if necessary) • , -�OQT 27 '99 12:12 TO-9-4252518782 FROM-FIRST AMERICAN NATIONAL ACCOUNTS-SEATTLE T-740 P.02/03 F-075 -, ti��� n ��tT �I�}!r a�}�Er M y Cts• •. . . .�,.:• c rip4, 7k•),�r s i? wiz ysli.i. f 5 ,.,,, n - . . 1rl f PY •e t?Vii• .'A., ;Mk, •t.��..•i.+• t �.,-,•.% 1 R''1 •4 l k.{ I t T v t,t.-L:, 1`,V ra.. c ,:',..A.... '�I%, t )lets 4 yr fl � Fgf��gy Y !�� r s w, tt ! z t , , Yf6 • p 1t A 0, d x t t l" F t '14. • rti:r;.1`;},: -v d<`^t k; r 1>;�(. ,11. y ( •f 1'f'�'.1 l� 2 ,14 -A ,,,lc.-11, -tiv t� '�'i�',pt,:i` ' 'SY 3 o', >+"�e�?v1.1 ,7 , 11'15 ySS`S.'f{�tt l.�_ }y+ :P • tvsa,,,,y,, i .. i,•�( 'r lrR ed y, .t a 6. ', { �i itti tg AZ!St. , :i 5 1,1 ,'. /til . fa •?" > :,..... ,,, � N, 9f k 'h,N ^ ;. 1�.•� b 'fv93 fit Y i,.'�••; tJ9 ..e: 4.,•sq,' „:•,; ^rti 'l '.. ?� tw > te, ;��{�.,� i� .. .. 'ivt✓ }y'a ,� L t 1yc L y.t'�'!i ..u:[fi t3Y.t `; 1�{ e.•nt"A' ©'~ �Iy��?!'ir�. 'F` .C� i7^T0' a•.. ti.••��y, ���. r'.L��t.��M"+Y'�t7r'.:� '(A Y+,E) ;4*p ti��Hsa>..• os 1, 1� }S .93..T'g •l!,,r T; Y �`F• e .1 :y.i,[ . �t,.r % ?..1 •.;�,,;�i,fp��'V,��>,;;; : -�:�.;..;,� §s•>;.�.�: th1n,�QQ_fe� �.ifthrl � .. �� . .. , PROJECT NAME• Home Depot APPLICATION NO:.,.. _ ' - -' , ---- _ The follow iin8 is,a list of property owners within Soo feet of the subject site. The Development services - , Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRE88 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL • NUMBER •PUGET WESTERN INC • SUITE 310 192305-9099-00 BOTHELL, WA 98011 202305-9159-04 & -9161-00 . TENG LENG SHENG 1116 'WINIFRED AVE 202305-9085-03-000 HSU MEI,YU PASADENA, CA 91107 202305-9085-03-001- &- -002 TIMM TAMMY S WILLIAMS AVE S #A 257029-0010-01 RENTON, WA 98055 • • r MONILLAS ROWENA '536 WILLIAMS AVE S B 257029-0020-09 - HUMANGIT • ' KENTON, WA 98055 EL SHARAWY, GUIRGUIS PO BOX 2561 723150-1570-03-000 ' HAIDY AUBURN, WA , 98071 . CODDINGTON JAMES & 538 BURNETT 723150-1455-03 CAROLYN/PT RENTON, WA 98055 • . UNIVERSITY STREET PO BOX 811097 723160-0595-04 6 • PROPERTIES CHICACO, IL 60681 , • SPRAGUE GERALD N 1430 SE 43RD PL 942350-0005-04 . - BELLEVUE, WA 98006 - SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL 942350-1010-05, BELLEVUE, WA 98.006 942350-1020-03, 3070-08, 3000-03,' 2000-05, 2010-03, • 3080-06, 3010-01, 2020-01, 2030-09, 3090-04, 3020-09, 2040-07, 2050-04, • 3100-02, 3030-07, 2060-02, 2070-00, • 3110-00', 3040-05, 2080-08, 2090-06, • 3120-08, 3050-02, 2100-04, 2110-02, 3110-06, 3060-00, 2120-00, 2130-08, STATE OF WASHINGTON 202305-9041-06 page 2 of 2 ' • Attach additional shuts,if neaessaiy) • • • (Continued) • NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER • kilr • •..dip .Y,i•C�. • • • • Applicant Certificatlork I, RatfAc.Q_t hereby certify that the above list(s)of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: s��•GptY�,•`1,�� 0 City of Renton Technical Services Records • Wit ill Title Company Records H> _� N` • C7 King County Assessors Records S .dSs ; • : 1, 2?- '' i��� f" Signed� G� e ' 0, �, i�i,1h 941 (Applicant) �,,,,,•� __ • NOTARY at���1w,�, `•- ATTESTED: Sub cried and sworn before me, a Notary Public, Ina for the State of Washington, residing p on the Z/t' day of her • _, 18q1 . • • Signed !� .L e," .: PAr#ensi & is 4 .111.‘16.1 (Notary Pubio) "*""Foie,of Renton Use**1. • • CERTIFICATION.ORMAILING • • I, • • • •, hereby certify that notices of the proposed application were mailed to MAY Employee) • . each listed property owner on • • • Signed •Date: • •NOTARY ' • ATTEST: Subscribed.and•swam before me, a Notary Public, In and for the State of Washington residing at on the day of „�_, 19 . IU.tpwp.doc REV 07/98 2 ,. •giiiliiiiiiiiiiiiiiii;.iN iliNfilliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiik0iiiMINgiNiiiIiiiii iilliiiiigiNiiiiWaiiiiMiiiiii.giiiiiiiiiii016011 giffIANNiiiiilEiatMaanniiiiiin iigigiiitOgi ijiiigAiiiiigi iiiir•Magatikill 1 172305-9017-01 RAMAC INC S GRADY WAY 3020 ISSAQUAH PINE LAKE RD S ISSAQUAH WA 98029 . 2 172305-9021-05 AUTO TRIM DESIGN 900 S GRADY WAY RENTON 98055 900 S GRADY WAY RENTON WA 98055 3 172305-9023-03 CITY OF RENTON 601 MAIN AVE S RENTON 98055 200 MILL AVE S RENTON WA 98055 4 172305-9054-05 EL-SHARAWY GUINGUIS K&HAIDY S 541 WELLS AVE S RENTON 98055 PO BOX 2561 AUBURN WA 98071 5 182305-9069-07 CHRYSLER REALTY CORPORATION 585 RAINIER AVE S RENTON 98055 800 CHRYSLER DR AUBURN HILLS MI 48326 6 182305-9078-06 KINLOW BENJAMIN M&PATRICIA 4310 NE 6TH ST APT B104 RENTON WA 98059 7 182305-9136-06 FRIEDMAN HENRY&SANDRA 630 RAINIER AVE S RENTON 98055 8803 SE 78TH ST MERCER ISLAND WA 98040 8 182305-9137-05 MOFFATT ROBERT L 549 SHATTUCK AVE S RENTON 98055 3709 MEADOW AVE N RENTON WA 98056 9 192305-9001-07 UNIVERSITY STREET PROPERTIE 700 RENTON AVE S RENTON 98055 PO BOX 811097 CHICAGO IL 60681 10 192305-9023-01 UNIVERSITY STREET PROPERTIE 707 S GRADY WAY RENTON 98055 PO BOX 811097 CHICAGO IL 60681 11 192305-9070-03 ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY 710 S GRADY WAY RENTON 98055 PO BOX 612485 LOS ANGELES CA 90051 12 192305-9092-07 RENTON FUEL COMPANY L L C 601 SW 7TH ST • RENTON 98055 4509 116TH AVE SE BELLEVUE WA 98006 13 192305-9094-05 PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC PO BOX 90868 BELLEVUE WA 98009 14 192305-9099-00 PUGET WESTERN INC SUITE 310 BOTHELL WA 98011 15 202305-9005-00 PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC PO BOX 90868 BELLEVUE WA 98009 is 202305-9008-07 PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC PO BOX 90868 BELLEVUE WA 98009 17 202305-9028-03 PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC PO BOX 90868 BELLEVUE WA 98009 is 202305-9041-06 STATE OF WASHINGTON 0 19 202305-9085-03-000 TENG LENG SHENG HSU MEI YU 700 BENSON RD S RENTON 98055 1116 WINIFRED AVE PASADENA CA 91107 20 202305-9085-03-001 TENG LENG SHENG HSU MEI YU 700 BENSON RD S RENTON 98055 1116 WINIFRED AVE PASADENA CA 91107 21 202305-9085-03-002 TENG LENG SHENG HSU MEI YU 700 BENSON RD S RENTON 98055 1116 WINIFRED AVE PASADENA CA 91107 22 202305-9146-00 PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC PO BOX 90868 BELLEVUE WA 98009 23 202305-9159-04 PUGET WESTERN INC SUITE 310 BOTHELL WA 98011 24 202305-9161-00 PUGET WESTERN INC SUITE 310 BOTHELL WA 98011 25 257029-0010-01 TIMM TAMMY S 536 WILLIAMS AVE S N RENTON 98055 WILLIAMS AVE S#A RENTON WA 98055 26 257029-0020-09 MONILLAS ROWENA HUMANGIT 536 WILLIAMS AVE S SOTH RENTON 98055 536 WILLIAMS AVE S B RENTON WA 98055 27 723150-1455-03 CODDINGTON JAMES&CAROLYN1PT 638 BURNETT RENTON WA 98055 28 723150-1570-03-000 EL SHARAWY GUIRGUIS HAIDY 535-1/2 WELLS AVE S RENTON 98055 PO BOX 2561 AUBURN WA 98071 29 723150-1570-03-001 EL SHARAWY GUIRGUIS HAIDY 635-112 WELLS AVE S RENTON 98055 PO BOX 2561 AUBURN WA 98071 30 723150-1570-03-002 EL SHARAWY GUIRGUIS HAIDY 635 WELLS AVE S RENTON 98055 PO BOX 2561 AUBURN WA 98071 31 723160-0595-04 UNIVERSITY STREET PROPERTIE 905 TALBOT RD PO BOX 811097 CHICAGO IL 60681 32 915460-0005-07 RENTON FUEL COMPANY L L C 601 SW 7TH ST RENTON 98055 4509 116TH AVE SE BELLEVUE WA 98006 33 916460-0170-06 RENTON FUEL COMPANY L L C . 601 SW 7TH ST RENTON 98055 4509 116TH AVE SE BELLEVUE WA 98006 34 942350-0005-04 SPRAGUE GERALD N 609 WILLIAMS AVE S ALL RENTON 98055 13430 SE 43RD PL BELLEVUE WA 98006 35 942350-1010-05 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL BELLEVUE WA 98006 36 942350-1020-03 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL BELLEVUE WA 98006 37 942350-2000-05 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL BELLEVUE WA 98006 38 942350-2010-03 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL BELLEVUE WA 98006 39 942350-2020-01 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL BELLEVUE WA 98006 40 942350-2030-09 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL BELLEVUE WA 98006 41 942350-2040-07 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL BELLEVUE WA 98006 42 942350-2050-04 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL BELLEVUE WA 98006 43 942350-2060-02 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL BELLEVUE WA 98006 44 942350-2070-00 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL BELLEVUE WA 98006 45 942350-2080-08 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL BELLEVUE WA 98006 46 942350-2090-06 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL BELLEVUE WA 98006 47 942350-2100-04 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL BELLEVUE WA 98006 as 942350-2110-02 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL BELLEVUE WA 98006 49 942350-2120-00 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL BELLEVUE WA 98006 ID 1996 WIn2Data 2000 Page:1 of 2 :::..o •:Add sss•:::.::>.;.;.,::::.� :> ::>::;ztts:�3atla:;:::;<;::;;;<;:• •>irltail::kddpess fVlaik:E :Eats;;.:;::>:IViail::. . :::>:::>gF►pn s:hiacs::>>>: •. 50 942350-2130-08 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL BELLEVUE WA 98006 51 942350-3000-03 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL BELLEVUE WA 98006 52 942350-3010-01 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL BELLEVUE WA 98006 53 942350-3020-09 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL BELLEVUE WA 98006 54 9423503030-07 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL BELLEVUE WA 98006 55 9423503040-05 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL BELLEVUE WA 98006 56 9423503050-02 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL BELLEVUE WA 98006 57 9423503060-00 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL BELLEVUE WA 98006 58 9423503070-08 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL BELLEVUE WA 98006_ 59 9423503080-06 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL BELLEVUE WA 98006 so 9423503090-04 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL BELLEVUE WA 98006 61 9423503100-02 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL BELLEVUE WA 98006 62 9423503110-00 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL BELLEVUE WA 98006 63 942350-3120-08 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL BELLEVUE WA 98006 64 9423503130-06 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL BELLEVUE WA 98006 ©1996 Win2Data 2000 Page:2 of 2 READY FOR TAX SEARCH --> RPCI 1723059181 RPCI 172305918101 DOC: 07/14/99 REVALUE ST:CURNT ACTIVE CITY OF RENTON 969700 REVISED PARCEL C OF CITY OF 1055 S GRADY WAY 10/08/99 RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT RENTON WA 98055 NO LUA 98-164 LLA RECORDING NO 9812109014 LOT:17-23-05 BLOCK:9181 LAST LEGAL BEING A PORTION OF GOV LOT 10 IS 10 IN SW 1/4 OF SW 1/4 RY OY ST SC NC LEVY OM-LV LAND IMPS BILLED PAID P A 00 X 2110 .00 t .00 99 0 2110 .00 .00 TOTAL DUE: OF SECTION 17-23-05 AND PORTION OF NW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 LY WLY OF BENSON ROAD SOUTH IN SECTION 20-23-05 RPCI 172305918101 JUMP CODE: • 1) Situs: S GRADY WAY, WA Lot Area: 30 APN: 172305-9017-01 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: MFU Use: MULTI FAMILY LOT Doc#: Cnty Use: 911 Owners: RAMAC INC Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-D3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 3020 ISSAQUAH PINE LAKE RD SE; ISSAQUAH WA 98029-7255 R037 Phone: 2) Situs: 900 S GRADY WAY, RENTON WA 98055-3231 C089 Lot Area: 38,180 APN: 172305-9021-05 Rec/Sale Dt: 03/26/1987 03/26/1987 Bldg/Liv Area: 7,290 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $342,800 Zoning: CO Use: STRIP COMMERCIAL CENTER Doc#: 8703260349 Cnty Use: 251 Owners: AUTO TRIM DESIGN Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-D3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1971 Mail: 900 S GRADY WAY; RENTON WA 98055-3231 C089 Phone: 3) Situs: 601 MAIN AVE S, RENTON WA 98055-2760 C036 Lot Area: 107,915 APN: 172305-9023-03 Rec/Sale Dt: 03/28/1997 03/26/1997 Bldg/Liv Area: 122,838 County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: IH Use: OFFICE BUILDING Doc#: 9703280082 Cnty Use: 274 Owners: CITY OF RENTON Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-D3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1987 Mail: 200 MILL AVE S; RENTON WA 98055-2132 C087 Phone: 4) Situs: 541 WELLS AVE S, RENTON WA 98055-2703 C036 Lot Area: 5,980 APN: 172305-9054-05 Rec/Sale Dt: 03/19/1999 03/15/1999 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,910 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $107,500 Zoning: CO Use: SFR Doc#: 9903191857 Cnty Use: 101 Owners: ELSHARAWY GUINGUIS K&HAIDY S Rooms: 6 Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 656-D3 Full Baths: 1 Half: Yr Built: 1916 Mail: PO BOX 2561;AUBURN WA 98071-2561 B001 Phone: 5) Situs: 585 RAINIER AVE S, RENTON WA 98055-2412 C031 Lot Area: 12,500 APN: 182305-9069'-07 Rec/Sale Dt: 02/04/1994- 02/04/1994 Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: $2,500,000 Zoning: CA Use: COMMERCIAL LOT Doc#: 9402041438 Cnty Use: 921 Owners: CHRYSLER REALTY CORPORATION Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-C3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 800 CHRYSLER DR;AUBURN HILLS MI 48326-2757 C002 Phone: 6) Situs: , WA Lot Area: 60,113 APN: 182305-9078-06 Rec/Sale Dt: 04/19/1990 04/18/1990 Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: $65,000 Zoning: R-8 Use: RESIDENTIAL LOT Doc#: 9004190860 Cnty Use: 901 Owners: KINLOW BENJAMIN M&PATRICIA Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-B2 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 4310 NE 5TH ST APT B104; RENTON WA 98059-4764 C071 Phone: . 7) Situs: 530 RAINIER AVE S, RENTON WA 98055-2411 C031 Lot Area: 6,600 APN: 182305-9136-06 Rec/Sale Dt: 07/28/1995-, 07/28/1995 Bldg/Liv Area: __ County: KING,WA Sale Price: $1,465,000 Zoning: r'CA Use: PARKING STRUCTURE Doc#: 9507281041 . Cnty Use: 401 Owners: FRIEDMAN HENRY&SANDRA Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-C3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 8803 SE 78TH ST; MERCER ISLAND WA 98040-5714 C015 Phone: ©1996 Win2Data 2000 Page: 1 of 10 • 8) Situs: 549 SHATTUCK AVE S, RENTON WA 98055-2424 C035 Lot Area: 6,000 APN: 182305-9137-05 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: CA Use: COMMERCIAL LOT Doc#: Cnty Use: 921 Owners: MOFFATT ROBERT L Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-C3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 3709 MEADOW AVE N; RENTON WA 98056-1551 C046 Phone: 9) Situs: 700 RENTON AVE S, RENTON WA 98055-3008 C036 Lot Area: 290,522 APN: 192305-9001-07 Rec/Sale Dt: 03/09/1998 03/09/1998 Bldg/Liv Area: 130,690 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $11,000 Zoning: CO Use: OFFICE BUILDING Doc#: 9803090889 Cnty Use: 274 Owners: UNIVERSITY STREET PROPERTIE Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-C4 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1986 Mail: PO BOX 811097; CHICAGO IL 60681-1097 B011 Phone: 10) Situs: 707 S GRADY WAY, RENTON WA 98055-3233 C089 Lot Area: 336,024 APN: 192305-9023-01 Rec/Sale Dt: 03/09/1998 03/09/1998 Bldg/Liv Area: 130,690 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $11,700 Zoning: CO Use: OFFICE BUILDING Doc#: 9803090890 Cnty Use: 274 Owners: UNIVERSITY STREET PROPERTIE Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-C4 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1986 Mail: PO BOX 811097; CHICAGO IL 60681-1097 B011 Phone: 11) Situs: 710 S GRADY WAY, RENTON WA 98055-3233 C089 Lot Area: 41,000 APN: 192305-9070-03 Rec/Sale Dt: 10/26/1993 09/30/1993 Bldg/Liv Area: 2,850 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $565,000 Zoning: CO Use: SERVICE STATION Doc#: 9310261739 Cnty Use: 428 Owners: ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-C4 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1994 Mail: PO BOX 512485; LOS ANGELES CA 90051-0485 B900 Phone: 12) Situs: 501 SW 7TH ST, RENTON WA 98055-2918 C002 Lot Area: 7,575 APN: 192305-9092-07 Rec/Sale Dt: 12/31/1996 12/23/1996 Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA ; Sale Price: $838,442 Zoning: CA Use: COMMERCIAL LOT Doc#: 9612312140 Cnty Use: 921 Owners: RENTON FUEL COMPANY L L C Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-C4 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 4509 116TH AVE SE; BELLEVUE WA 98006-2757 C046 Phone: 13) Situs: , WA Lot Area: 37,189 APN: 192305-9094-05 Rec/Sale Dt: 10/27/1987 10/27/1987 Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: $144,800 Zoning: CO Use: UTILITIES Doc#: 8710271070 Cnty Use: 622 Owners: PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-C4 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: PO BOX 90868; BELLEVUE WA 98009-0868 B900 Phone: 14) Situs: , WA Lot Area: APN: 192305-9099=00 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA ' Sale Price: Zoning: Use: RESIDENTIAL(NEC) Doc#: Cnty Use: 001 Owners: PUGET WESTERN INC Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-C4 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: SUITE 310; BOTHELL WA 98011 Phone: ©1996 Win2Data 2000 Page:2 of 10 J • 15) Situs: , WA Lot Area: 76,230 APN: 202305-900S-00 Rec/Sale Dt: 10/19/1979 10/19/1979 Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: $22,500 Zoning: SF Use: RESIDENTIAL LOT Doc#: 7910190367 Cnty Use: 901 Owners: PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-D4 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: PO BOX 90868; BELLEVUE WA 98009-0868 B900 Phone: 16) Situs: , WA Lot Area: 98,000 APN: 202305-9008.07 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: IH Use: UTILITIES Doc#: Cnty Use: 622 Owners: PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-D4 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: PO BOX 90868; BELLEVUE WA 98009-0868 B900 Phone: 17) Situs: , WA Lot Area: 25,265 APN: 202305-902843 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: CO Use: RESIDENTIAL LOT Doc#: Cnty Use: 901 Owners: PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-D4 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: PO BOX 90868; BELLEVUE WA 98009-0868 B900 Phone: 18) Situs: , WA Lot Area: 1,350 APN: 202305-9041.06 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: CO Use: RESIDENTIAL LOT Doc#: Cnty Use: 901 Owners: STATE OF WASHINGTON Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-D4 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 0; Phone: 19) Situs: 700 BENSON RD S,RENTON WA 98055 CO28 Lot Area: 234,000 APN: 202305-9085-03-000 Rec/Sale Dt: 07/18/1989 07/14/1989 Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: $135,000 Zoning: SF Use: RESIDENTIAL LOT Doc#: 8907180139 Cnty Use: 901 Owners: TENG LENG,SHENG HSU MEI YU Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-D4 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 1116 WINIFRED AVE; PASADENA CA 91107-5558 C080 Phone: 20) Situs: 700 BENSON RD S,RENTON WA 98055 CO28 Lot Area: 234,000 APN: 202305-9085-03-001 Rec/Sale Dt: 07/18/1989 07/14/1989 Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA ' Sale Price: $135,000 Zoning: SF Use: RESIDENTIAL LOT Doc#: 8907180139 Cnty Use: 901. Owners: TENG LENG SHENG HSU MEI YU Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-D4 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 1116 WINIFRED AVE; PASADENA CA 91107-5558 C080 Phone: 21) Situs: 700 BENSON RD S, RENTON WA 98055 CO28 Lot Area: 234,000 APN: 202305-9085-03-002 Rec/Sale Dt: 07/18/1989 07/14/1989 Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: $135,000 Zoning: SF Use: RESIDENTIAL LOT Doc#: 8907180139 Cnty Use: 901 Owners: TENG LENG SHENG HSU MEI YU Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-D4 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 1116 WINIFRED AVE; PASADENA CA 91107-5558 C080 Phone: ©1996 Win2Data 2000 Page:3 of 10 • 22) Situs: , WA Lot Area: 10,890 APN: 202305-9146-00 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: CO Use: RESIDENTIAL LOT Doc#: Cnty Use: 901 Owners: PUGET SOUND ENERGYIELEC Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-D4 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: PO BOX 90868; BELLEVUE WA 98009-0868 B900 Phone: 23) Situs: , WA Lot Area: 24,600 APN: 202305-9159-04 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: RC Use: RESIDENTIAL LOT Doc#: Cnty Use: 901 Owners: PUGET WESTERN INC Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-E4 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: SUITE 310; BOTHELL WA 98011 Phone: 24) Situs: , WA Lot Area: APN: 202305-916140 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: Use: RESIDENTIAL(NEC) Doc#: Cnty Use: 001 Owners: PUGET WESTERN INC Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-D4 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: SUITE 310; BOTHELL WA 98011 Phone: ' 25) Situs: 536 WILLIAMS AVE S N,RENTON WA 98055-2726 C035 Lot Area: 6,839 APN: 257029-0010101 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: 1,000 County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 121 Owners: TIMM TAMMY S Rooms: Bedrms: 2 Map Pg: 656-D3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1998 Mail: WILLIAMS AVE S#A; RENTON WA 98055 Phone: 26) Situs: 536 WILLIAMS AVE S SOTH,RENTON WA 98055-2726 C035 Lot Area: 6,839 APN: 257029-0020=09 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: 1,000 County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 121 Owners: MONILLAS ROWENA HUMANGIT Rooms: Bedrms: 2 Map Pg: 656-D3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1998 Mail: 536 WILLIAMS AVE S B; RENTON WA 98055-2726 C035 Phone: " 27) Situs: , WA Lot Area: 1,653 APN: 723150-1455-03 Rec/Sale Dt: 09/22/1983 09/22/1983 Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: $32,500 Zoning: RM-U Use: RESIDENTIAL LOT Doc#: 8309220676 Cnty Use: 901 Owners: CODDINGTON JAMES&CAROLYN/PT Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-D3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 538 BURNETT; RENTON WA 98055-1405 CR38 Phone: 28) Situs: 535-1/2 WELLS AVE S,RENTON WA 98055-2703 C036 Lot Area: 6,840 APN: 723150-1570-03-000 Rec/Sale Dt: 10/18/1994 10/12/1994 Bldg/Liv Area: 3,010 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $125,000 Zoning: RM-U Use: SFR Doc#: 9410180832 Cnty Use: 101 Owners: EL SHARAWY GUIRGUIS HAIDY Rooms: 7 Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 656-D3 Full Baths: 3 Half: Yr Built: 1910 Mail: PO BOX 2561;AUBURN WA 98071-2561 B001 Phone: ©1996 Win2Data 2000 Page:4 of 10 29) Situs: 535-1/2 WELLS AVE S,RENTON WA 98055-2703 C036 Lot Area: 6,840 APN: 723150-1570-03-001 Rec/Sale Dt: 10/18/1994 10/12/1994 Bldg/Liv Area: 500 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $125,000 Zoning: RM-U Use: SFR Doc#: 9410180832 Cnty Use: 101 Owners: EL SHARAWY GUIRGUIS HAIDY Rooms: 3 Bedrms: 1 Map Pg: 656-D3 Full Baths: 1 Half: Yr Built: 1929 Mail: PO BOX 2561;AUBURN WA 98071-2561 B001 Phone: 30) Situs: 535 WELLS AVE S, RENTON WA 98055-2703 C036 Lot Area: 6,840 APN: 723150-1570-03-002 Rec/Sale Dt: 10/18/1994 10/12/1994 Bldg/Liv Area: 2,510 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $125,000 Zoning: RM-U Use: SFR Doc#: 9410180832 Cnty Use: 101 Owners: EL SHARAWY GUIRGUIS HAIDY Rooms: 4 Bedrms: 2 Map Pg: 656-D3 Full Baths: 2 Half: Yr Built: 1910 Mail: PO BOX 2561;AUBURN WA 98071-2561 B001 Phone: 31) Situs: 905 TALBOT RD, WA Lot Area: 14,641 APN: 723160-0595-04 Rec/Sale Dt: 03/09/1998 03/09/1998 Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: $11,000 Zoning: CO Use: COMMERCIAL LOT Doc#: 9803090889 Cnty Use: 921 Owners: UNIVERSITY STREET PROPERTIE Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-C4 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: PO BOX 811097; CHICAGO IL 60681-1097 B011 Phone: 32) Situs: 501 SW 7TH ST,RENTON WA 98055-2918 C002 Lot Area: 55,920 APN: 915460-0005407 Rec/Sale Dt: 12/31/1996 12/23/1996 Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: $838,442 Zoning: CA Use: COMMERCIAL ACREAGE Doc#: 9612312140 Cnty Use: 922 Owners: RENTON FUEL COMPANY L L C Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-C4 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 4509 116TH AVE SE; BELLEVUE WA 98006-2757 C046 Phone: 33) Situs: 501 SW 7TH ST, RENTON WA 98055-2918 C002 Lot Area: 1,800 APN: 915460-0170-06 Rec/Sale Dt: 12/31/1996 12/23/1996 Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: $838,442 Zoning: CA Use: COMMERCIAL LOT Doc#: 9612312140 Cnty Use: 921 Owners: RENTON FUEL COMPANY L L C Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-C4 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 4509 116TH AVE SE; BELLEVUE WA 98006-2757 C046 Phone: 34) Situs: 609 WILLIAMS AVE S ALL, RENTON WA 98055-2744 C035 Lot Area: 26,682 APN: 942350-0005-04 Rec/Sale Dt: 12/17/1997 12/15/1997 Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: $1,215,000 Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9712171414 Cnty Use: 122 Owners: SPRAGUE GERALD N Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-C3 PATRICIA ' Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1979 Mail: 13430 SE 43RD PL; BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 C066 Phone: 35) Situs: , WA Lot Area: APN: 942350-1010-05 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 129 Owners: SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-C3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 13430 SE 43RD PL; BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 C066 Phone: ©1996 Win2Data 2000 Page: 5 of 10 36) Situs: , WA Lot Area: APN: 942350-1020-03 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 129 Owners: SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-C3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 13430 SE 43RD PL; BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 C066 Phone: 37) Situs: , WA Lot Area: APN: 942350-20001-05 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 129 Owners: SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-C3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 13430 SE 43RD PL; BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 C066 Phone: 38) Situs: , WA Lot Area: APN: 942350-2010-03 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 129 Owners: SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-C3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 13430 SE 43RD PL; BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 C066 Phone: 39) Situs: , WA Lot Area: APN: 942350-2020=01 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 129 Owners: SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-C3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 13430 SE 43RD PL; BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 C066 Phone: 40) Situs: , WA Lot Area: APN: 942350-2030-09 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 129 Owners: SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-C3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 13430 SE 43RD PL; BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 C066 Phone: 41) Situs: , WA Lot Area: APN: 942350-2040-07 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: I Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 129 Owners: SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-C3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 13430 SE 43RD PL; BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 C066 Phone: 42) Situs: , WA Lot Area: APN: 942350-2050-04 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 129 Owners: SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-C3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 13430 SE 4312D PL; BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 C066 Phone: ©1996 Win2Data 2000 Page:6 of 10 • 43) Situs: , WA Lot Area: APN: 942350-20601 O2 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 129 Owners: SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-C3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 13430 SE 43RD PL; BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 C066 Phone: 44) Situs: , WA Lot Area: APN: 942350-2070-01 O0 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA . Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 129 Owners: SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-C3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 13430 SE 43RD PL; BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 C066 Phone: 45) Situs: , WA Lot Area: APN: 942350-2080.08 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 129 Owners: SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-C3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 13430 SE 43RD PL; BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 C066 Phone: 46) Situs: , WA Lot Area: APN: 942350-2090 i06 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA 1 Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 129 Owners: SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-C3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 13430 SE 43RD PL; BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 C066 Phone: 47) Situs: , WA Lot Area: APN: 942350-2100104 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 129 Owners: SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-C3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 13430 SE 43RD PL; BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 C066 Phone: 48) Situs: , WA Lot Area: APN: 942350-2110 01 2 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA 1, Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 129 Owners: SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-C3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 13430 SE 43RD PL; BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 C066 Phone: I 49) Situs: , WA Lot Area: APN: 942350-2120-00 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 129 Owners: SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-C3 1 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 13430 SE 43RD PL; BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 C066 Phone: ©1996 Win2Data 2000 Page:7 of 10 •, 50) Situs: , WA Lot Area: APN: 942350-2130-08 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area:. County: KING,WA , Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 129 Owners: SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-C3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 13430 SE 43RD PL; BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 C066 Phone: 51) Situs: , WA Lot Area: APN: 942350 3000-03 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 129 Owners: SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-C3 1 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 13430 SE 43RD PL; BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 C066 Phone: 52) Situs: , WA Lot Area: APN: 942350-3010411 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA . Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 129 Owners: SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-C3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 13430 SE 43RD PL; BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 C066 Phone: 53) Situs: , WA Lot Area: APN: 942350-3020-09 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA ; Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 129 Owners: SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-C3 1 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 13430 SE 43RD PL; BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 C066 Phone: i 54) Situs: , WA Lot Area: APN: 942350-3030107 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA , Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 129 Owners: SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-C3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 13430 SE 43RD PL; BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 C066 Phone: 55) Situs: , WA Lot Area: APN: 942350-3040;05 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 129 Owners: SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-C3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 13430 SE 43RD PL; BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 C066 Phone: 56) Situs: , WA Lot Area: APN: 942350-3050 02 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA i Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 129 Owners: SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-C3 1 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 13430 SE 43RD PL; BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 C066 Phone: ©1996 Win2Data 2000 I Page: 8 of 10 I . 57) Situs: , WA Lot Area: APN: 942350-3060-00 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 129 Owners: SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-C3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 13430 SE 43RD PL; BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 C066 Phone: 58) Situs: , WA Lot Area: APN: 942350-307U-08 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 129 Owners: SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-C3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 13430 SE 43RD PL; BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 C066 Phone: 59) Situs: , WA Lot Area: APN: 942350-3080-06 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 129 Owners: SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-C3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 13430 SE 43RD PL; BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 C066 Phone: 60) Situs: , WA Lot Area: APN: 942350-3090=04 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA ' Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 129 Owners: SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-C3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 13430 SE 43RD PL; BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 C066 Phone: 61) Situs: , WA Lot Area: APN: 942350-3100-02 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 129 Owners: SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-C3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 13430 SE 43RD PL; BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 C066 Phone: 62) Situs: , WA Lot Area: APN: 942350-3110 700 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 129 Owners: SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-C3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 13430 SE 43RD PL; BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 C066 Phone: 63) Situs: , WA Lot Area: APN: 942350-3120-08 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 129 Owners: SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-C3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 13430 SE 43RD PL; BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 C066 Phone: ©1996 Win2Data 2000 Page: 9 of 10 • 64) Situs: , WA Lot Area: APN: 942350-3130-06 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 129 Owners: SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 656-C3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 13430 SE 43RD PL; BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 C066 Phone: ©1996 Win2Data 2000 Page: 10 of 10 • • • • ---,I,-'- j'a EI I :i i- ': — Fy M'.:- tip, :S''ll�j 'I, - hat"'"' _ ��1_ 3, - \ a, ®NE a ! Est` •�• ,\,/�,w` axr,' ,g V, - -f glo 1. I. III • +En } }\ *~•% I, Lill; e' -1 l \.• .�K a:.e., ,�.s v 'fi..* Dil,E. 'Y•• 5a_r,,„_u.r ..wri �`` R t ' "�� _ ...�G- -_. s' 8 �; : t� c- c �• /J/j 5.zO/ N�-1 ® iR1 /.ie. ..!- r.. a /Te + R N/w eAVE}. > b= s; ,�• /t a. 3 Aa 4�0�O` .10 E 1�M}b� girl'-� tifCI C 6.. 11.... :e )► 1 \M.=mio€� ;`il-. I ' y.. -,`w ,r� Illic ICI nv ,n 4�'" z— 4111•11:". iii -, ,,,.....,,,,„v••,-.•- 'I. 1 ., '0..jr(c� ,, \ i ! H: 1�1�IIJ,far& a1.10, +'� �' �I •A?ilf_'.' a„T�'� 4 ,dI ]IS' 3A — V _ . 2•'_ I B q •.NA'lU Y IJ6 €u'?�" I. R'I �m' �� ROW. 1 P ,I., •" ' )- • 7 e2--°g'g5!d6"=g/lb31.; Idl lagElega RP . -_ 1.',i It+ e,/.'' " -- di ° m m•m I 11 r �" - ,-- - i. I u 0ZF 1, P Q I�}p tlEi TI .1ya�16• { r/r •sHATTUCK y -_( I cnre l,rL .l.� m'wUl�JY.F PHJ.�• �'I F'"� I ®'I d i e ", 1 1 - c . �] --T - T.$ ,...�, I =>'2a'J 41, ,wNiTWORTN ram s e \ /4+y1� rim-' m _ t� ry o :: r, : ya a i,I �- l -* 4 .1 '1=7 C." a,a = ._ a =o- �e�€�;���oo �t Ela "ed6u'� � 6�e�u 0 1 1' �€G4� G "�1 a� P 'd M1� lr© aa r <f • _ (- ' . ; 'i I I�`S :A:I::l. a L • L�{:r.„l 1 �RR 11}�!�G 4wei,r' cl Y3 T YI /���!14 0 -, .'r4 tr i�7�� yy.�yyyy cilip11 iET,IR ,-^'•,, 1 ' , • I�I1 I• N°RR/S • •ALf • S I I '"�YY'Ii"`l4i SSiZli �Fi71tFE�L�� i� - - ! n� e�r,. 9 �C Erin `sy�/ a� Y�.. '''�r9. - /�� I� • i1 319� 1 r , e a v^ ¢ €M I I1lC ,..e I-3CC6€liB zit Y /ii ! 1 ' O' 4 airs r��� \ma...a, a ,�•a ' 111 IIEoEpEp-r� I . /J4r> aw ``qq ti 1R ..Ali-Fi15 ` • IICQG!"01F L!,i, or ,t,eK:: ''.7„ i•�A•c vi.f i;a a•€y a0 5 SM/TNERS • AVE S S• z u -9►�'��DR9Ri t� Iry �1�a //A9�i�IR rpPP� PF;�'R . € c J a 'I1ZP '� r6�t�[JItp�p�pRgg+pgq�Cr I€yBaD�'j.\Q•iiii.4 1 a �,,t�i r� pN I•�I,-I m•r vE h.;.,titi_., ..• n?� a t. L J _ ♦ '+llQ I\V'iU-�ii6�A52 1N .]Il3" .'l's t,Irk+1 ii 1/R/�i11t b 4. ilitir,..wi...11,:,,,,,,,:p.. a a BURNfTT AVE /� S` _ ,_ al .rig, r I ra a -.a f1. .ao/I/A% i'>- • s 'i a'Ut Mili .}a. 6kikiiii`V1Ikillau�J ./Y• MM. , 1 rI I ;=na L. WGG/MS PAVE\ II 5 �X//.[' —\\,\x▪ ./ ./I ..i�".. \� ? r\v,,, - a� odo�maOgGlt.© eI6V.11lall.,h `r'I ;i'a .oli© v. "6\ 'sFc J IP '�b®lay°A'�IP ga,0:l�IaPl-1��' J'� P�l9A@A 11�11�' >. t R i\ ,:I I'•® d P� , S y A' j\:.. _ C wEGC3 AIVIE.II €€,, - S .,i ,•' • aP 3sn vx\ '' P3e ,/ 1 it c...i' Iiii ',Zj.9 � 2'•-:^ 6 m Op.}il-t - .i�91R E t � P �, .,,,,,..?,\----",--- • \ �,.°., � y � � . �-=_-_ ' ...,,..mi. PUA/N L- AVE 4 I�-•(.5 � o -I • ,E \?f\. ,... ii ::',,, c7,7,,p`:;,,,.<2,0,'\•,'S..'.:116.,O .. / --•C^V.c-. �..- .�^v-1,2trRSSIATE--.._._... .--. �9 `•'`'•C P.19S'IQ -r '�" ..t,. :,y' x• �1'id�l� •. ':eii ��a, ,•/. -.._. �f�„_ Ar/ee •AVE s S Rh E ; O - . $ :e 1.` `'�: 1.�uu�i °A Q°llf7u ���R ' �€�G° ®� Ras• ' at .ie If jj�l s '+iq '1' �I b R - -' I E ; .: +a `4` �a f, �(� P .�f�n/vj``^^��: b, \ e;^ �+' ] bV,�9(,�I��s {j I ed � e' �Rp IrLI•�M �Y Pba•®ei 3i®E E'-'._f yY 1 - . S 1/' ,44. \ '`WENTON AVE. /� S ° 3l.. 'lam 7•' 4�,` , i �'I:j i Q. a i .. I 9: ," 0. I ni, C)m O:x' • �l' ` �'�. - �i \: I_ ii G d6Q�;.og7o r'. nil '.:,p,'?w•.. 9 •-I Ti I 7.R•_ ,° ��` , .01'\ `� c -I Ni, R II�:X-_..-___ •GRANT AVE 5 '1 ••G•A'N' • S. Avc.• - •L h• \,\::_:-.-'•' - I, , k' ®. 4�Y9 • "eoa s 6 6 ,'4•Yi','a,', _r.�n - - - '''' I.,'Pt: �.,• n11�. It 1 ,MI al G ;aj]-T tl d .ET p•= s ,! .), Q' s•�\ Y'"1 •1I" I \ \\` I' I• . i .aI�YiiR-I.,—pOIO�I4'®.h a >a: "�� ',�Mem/ e / � /,,,- \4 s it �"Q_ 4 .%., p1 \ 1 I I ., '." roGn s -j .Re. __ /.• t� s I ' .$ ,4 �`. ....'ti �J s m 4 , I I \\ , I i. '• r WgG3-d:¢, b gm®' :�a r 4q j a . ®: g 1, (.7 --?► I/ I is \':; r 0,- z 4 s : '� -\\1....c.\, . r`IIla a m".:41., : _ .P"'.Y:a, '�, .r. ra# - o / a 11 \r.,vmv :©o^' ;III II I , ,,...„,,,,_ , '2 p , :ig- "2'2 �.• y "q, \\•i"31\\III II I - o/ __ .aq °' P: �.; �`i ..g' • �' ;\€I. ` , r I I Q .':S / I • . _ . . • • • . . . , , . • . , , - ..• 7"'''• . , 14010. ,..-...---v,.;,,,- ,•-.,,,, - \i,.• x. 1.i - . -7 .1__Irj_1_/ra. ' 'iti • -- ',,........_..........1.:404...40„vemrt.,•.3c:::,-4-...„‘,:i..i. ),1t.„,,ifil A.L.P.-1.,._‘.....0 Aim- li, . Olt at Spl " " \INTO, •\'ttriA.-.1..air',1". __1-.. s IgIV3OMISTIK. : \ -1"3. WIWI hi't<'i;n4\;•_f - ,!.fit nal g-GIL 1 1: .9016r; ri-el?- za Mi• M7it iiiii '4 Wr ,..,.41 --- 1111121._,_!---f441... ,.. . ,,. ., : .;,g111a1 VAIIII_ 1.1,,___,,,,,.__ I.. 103"4 ille r4-EM. '.,---C1)' Wirai''-,- 72..E.7k, 'IM''' '''')!, .A• .„,01,1.y.. .,, ,.' t \ --. ei4 Immplff,l g-.11---m vai,-;:.--•zi. .....'e4•'4.‘'oggifri... .*%v•ry.in,.,. Alit A * • y. A,ji 0 kg L.- .iteil•-• '1 ..41,•11 211 'I-' n.' ik i" 00-;* ,-- 1"_;„ •• - . i vi'ICK:!.", %.„-•-:l•,'-- v-,,.. , ... •it...•,..,,e;.;$..-- , . ig.. ...„.._ . ,.ii,oz,.9.:-. ..--•,,,,.. . --- - 1 "''":. 161111tAl kiV,, ,, ., ;. . ,..,,,,-_,q,:.,,• :11;111,d.,E. iii...,_.,...itni :-';`-',i'.:-•,-,s-,3."4"--- -,74-- 1.1_,.. ,-'', di fis,„-T;,„.,, ,,iviti,5..;4,,vi[6,..,42_1;,. U- ,...y ., ".-----Y,- ' •;1.--ii;R.1\ '!'t. .4ktvi:: t. s`k:kq14102f,P221,11. • -'?, r: , ,,,.- , ;1 1,•,1•1.,..1..„, -..,„,.., , .:c- .-• ...!1"------%-hiji,t,44141,n.:. , - ,\,0 , , •,,,clit,,,(2,\,i... . •••,- .,_ • Illi c--- ',,,e- •,z: '..0 C..W,o'i 1/ --------------=7- ----..7--___,:f_-_-7t.„--, offlFIR feb 'V'. , . \ :; '' ...__ V. ?•-•:4(-,34''''1-:'-- iP.''454.t. „1-..,1',4",; .'•T.' W: .,12.:74:, :,, • %.51._ J°ci Pf-,4-?--:--,-zrr-'= ,'''' ' ••-,---cl" ''''.=1 '4' ...M.,& A ...,/, - . . .. .-q[4_,___, :1 ,... • .. !:,oft„ffig ./ _./1;,_'','‘,':',?,...' ' •-•- ,h, ._,__... , , WIti,,:•, •DirkW4j„. .. ith,. w 01, , ik ,'`,,' ,fkot‘' , • , -giuffigivo2ZIPIRIIFY,'-ri "Lein ,I, t- '. ill 'Ai •,- e \ \ I• 1 1 dff wea,7--,AFimena - ' ',\'' - - ''--- ',` 1 .eriiii fic;stsist".'2,,,t7f 17777---- ,P •\...-‘,7; • • .4-- - - ''-' ' 1191ZIP-ITOMMIKErr ^-- '.. •,••-"--,..„..1 i',.1 ' - • J i r \ i ,I• --- -' • . ,.. , 'En--- • .: . .)-- •' " ,; 1,i t°I 'I r\. •,,,.\ \-1,1•Ef Iffittet'.:Vr..4 BM 4.141,Ce-1 ' ''-'• I, ,, , f'•' 1 . '' ‘,',,,i Ai 1----,--,,------•,<7.--..- , -v1'1.e tr:•., " ,. ... : ,,,-,, , ;:,._, ., -.: ., ,, , f. ,,,,-31 7•S41, ...! 1 :•-., t'..*'''''. ;-r----,rto/ i:.i :I If-4,...,41, ,, ,,‘..\,4,-,,-4 ir ,, z....---11 --'''''', '''. If', ,...42,14,.- , - \.,,,,,, ,., -•,- . ---,, . ., ,--, 1 ,,..,,,••,,,, . , ,,, • , „, • -_-,,,,_•.-,., - . ..,-:;,, , . •••. . .,., ,, , ,,,,,,,• ,.....:4,,,, - ,,•••". ,-..,._ -,..-: .,,,., , I'• ,.r:5 ki.t.,,•, • • • . 1 1 11 I.fl r o -- 1 I 1 1 ! ; j .g I i by I I __.. wma Invc ___- _ __ _ _.vim .._____ - _ _ - ST.. - - - - - - • ,p 1 - t' // : \� El .1*- , I I '•I mil • 1 , � — 1 • — 1— -- 1-----1---- 4 - u: . • I ill I ' I I - 1 KEEL i i . . Ini 1 1 1 le le II f-` I�-� �®pd[gat�I� I �(1T�{ �IT�p� [pg�q� T-' -� ® I1 ...� ,`. �, E\—+-_ b op Wile pppJ���� •M_•�•i i 19' `. 19 9 9 & 9� —674®RIA( ir�w, }�- _ _. _ .\ -- 1 x ) \ mrs I • _ oar ®I'-� .... I I' 1 1 � 1t�1n I •V\• .\• 1,\ !,, _ C9 Tr,'''' u�� ' • I ••o•• •* � •'` 1 7 FH11iY 01 '® . II • D11ER I_ F]OT mam„w E _ nI • I s•ciu¢ 1 m¢ 11 .1 7 _ __ _ a ob b b m o b m m o ob b b b THE HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. RENTON, WA BASED ON SITE PLAN: #WA-131i INIIIMINIINIMI eagigi►■tatetMgisaMeaeZ•Waea :■gill t•1eam■►■ Otatt ll fail I 1 5 1 0 1 RED HILL AVENUE / SUITE 200 • T U S T I N. CALIFORNIA 9 7 7 5 0 • TEL 7 1 4 •7 S 9 •0 5 0 0 • FAX 7 1 4 ' 2 5 9 •5 4 5 0 • fi `''` LANDSCAPE LEGEND AND DETAILS ,: 4 11p_ --1-- _ - ��\• _ —_ - - LANDSCAPE-LEGEND LANDSCAP�CEGEND CONT. t t 1 G ;..,f A .` .;.. , • SYMBOL BOTANICAL!COMMON NAME MIN.SIMI CONDDION/REMARKS SYMBOL BOTANICAL!COMMON NAME MIN.SIZE/CONOmON I REMARKS •. EXISTU4G VEOETATNNN: Save and protect where shown to rem ln. - SMALL SHRUBS: MIn.15,18^M l Spread,full and bushy, f - (�?R .. , spacingasshown b'Rerdam :: Wady Berbsry :L - - Q Z 'Exbtlng Tres B.rb.daL Rao OImY -i', . .,^:,v 3 Wl mseremoved Rosa Glow Barberry �(" "' O2 BS' ....to EiB9ny yte,"on Ilse crenate'Northam Beauty. ' ^` 3 S yZ JJ O mremem;J,N', Northam Beaky Japanese Hdly DO ran-FIR STAum LQ� ' :, IMWLN TD xlvuer,L g i w DECIDUOUS SHADE TREES: MM.2"cal.,full,well-branched.metaled,BUB Pin..mugo'mugo' / ii onnu000 N.510 - ?�0 W 3 a 1=1 r♦1 Aar u Jurum'OrNn INr.• ar mnfalrer,esoonp ea anown an plan. Mugho Pine n/aa.� y� poo0 r�erala CO n, U C] 'C' Sugar tie Prunus I.'OttoL ip, . (�"'Nr. Tf PPEVNLNr. a O Q Green Mounrr.ny rMa •4'' l C WO fn Z � Llquldember etyre.Nlua • Ono Luykan Laurel n j (•-`� 4 F,Z Z¢ Sheet Gum " '' MPECPIEO MILCN oW ¢ 2 LL. g TI4 omMaru Redmond. FERNS S GRASSES: / / FSU015 rod F Redmond American Linden Carex mmrowll Yadogate• 1 gel.,lull,hearty leaves,Spedng as .. .. nmro 8 ro'eOR Q Ouerewrube ••• Variegated Japanese Sedge ehownapten. ��.k14 ,-.;:�r: %`" (aEEePECs) U Red Oak MlwnNu.s.'Yeku Jima. 2gel.,Ng,hselmyleeva,sparing as r l ill.11�q.a/1 er.OF O Yoke Jima Mellen Gress shown a plan. `o�41 I T��II_ ALL Zolkov.Nrr•1. .11=1f=_I.;,�' RAMP.eaaaLLL • Za/kove Pool.,,humS00 munttum 1 gel.,Mn.(8)leaves,full,frailly, will kwIce BREAK O n errD Western Sword Fem Sparing as shown on plan. ., pDplp,eLL 00. ear.,W MT. n DECIDUOUS ACCENT TREES: MIn.1-3/4"al.,full,welFbrendled,matched, B Aar eIrdnWnn US.container,Sparing as shown on plan. PERENNIALS: 1 gal.ant,full,start first row 12`from edge f oQ w. 'Fln Vine Maple G.renlum'Johnson's glue• of planting area,typ.,quantities asnored on O Coniferous Tree Planting g ry o m e„ Aar glnnele n. Geranium the glen. Not to Side 8 000 -E ® Flame Amur Maple Heu.h.re'Persa Purpw W �[o 3S B.Wl.I.Wu�I Coral Balls Cxeldl llum nlam Hoy raollb r• Z W a U Q i .x �mPlIC I°pn L0 Ices r .i:.s::.•' •, erP00 AT Z t0 - f(eta' T Lavandul..ta..n.. 11 l•;"•Vifli,a4A y Comue house Spanish Lavender ; • NR3eRr O Q Of g /louse Dogwood Y •�� dOfPrunus yMansle GROUNDCOVERS: 4'pots©24'o.c.Mang.or 1 gal. 38' FOLD eaLK Crs Uyl Yosh/no Chem © Arctoda n auwanl o.c.ben d Nll,sbrt nrel row l2" r r`. ;r,. Ppp�p�,:p W xv e.ova ne, ,-j•���•I*k;�, - ` !Z``%;;,, O aly� o IpnmMnnick from sage d planting area,Np. •ti�r,`A✓'*'+': "eA"' (7 CONIFEROUS TREES: MIn.8'-T ht.,full anti bushy to bens,B&B m f 7 O container,sparing a•shown on plan. Cotonoa.r d.mmed Cf'n:'Y•:t 1 . ewew rntAOE x Calm..deeunens ""fff ��1l11 tzg� a ®® Ina Cedar Beerbery Cofaneester If' / 000080 r+x.w 3 V iq i Plnue eylwetrb Nyp.dam ayelnum Scotch Mile St.erlcJohn's Wort /_<., .f i��� '.,::::::%" aT ..o'ao Peeudoeug.nlorl.wsn Inn.mnmr =11 • =11=11' 5ACKFILL Douglas Flr DwedPemdnkk n -hl• =- ..Hp •TT Viburnum d.vlda 11014,a.Tn¢ _ .1*-. •a cowTnMER ilvd� Western Red Cedar David's Viburnum r 4 NC 6i L DI6 B 01.ECPIED '3 SEEDED or SODDED LAWN AREA: See mpedk'stlons MEDIUM to LARGE SHRUBS: Min.I&ht/spread.full and bushy,Spacing as 0 AINIe p.'Shorwoadll' shrew on plan. Shrub Planting Ababa rbut Q ROUGH SEED AREA: Bee specifications 0 Not to Scde a�yitei_:. ;Comac(SbawborryT 1 gg Q e Dldwhy.d. p� Igel L B;t .- y co.no.oacRose 3 a +Cemus dba'Arysnto margin a. }, �• ",„: + Variegated Dogwood T. • ``22 `L raf�:.'h° •Euonyma slats"Compute. r' 0., or N 9 ';'ti ., 'S,. Comro0Bumirg Bush Nat ®' `'; X _ DHOware nee �jQ �¢,�. Nydaalf.mla �"sk@ 9 o,.... 1::''4 l)y Poole Wax Myrtle \. I�v%7 yr, +fit alCl �'7�3 n.v t•.- is.....,.. : L4 Y,`,.... Nahala aquifellum _ v If .Y"' . \• ,f� Oregon Grape �I/,- mCaEl!rove - '•. �� l t 4+ •�4.Tlaa�fse,d.NeyN R.0 r !/ I - • •-''.. ':',.,.brfof ?RadHeaeeriyBamboo 1 q GAME ' 4 .1 po Ioo'Fo�tFMa..' iffl � ,I,aDPaTe mATE CZ •• t �j .'#o.r roreou. ..•• .. avrwn w m PJM RApdpderMmn - ��,�......,....._..,.. v4r { - - Rh.Cod.ndr.'Unique' ' "sli [[ p��I®�l%%' ` ea,ep as i or equal °Z. 'a�.. lSp_TI' saw ..R1b0O..agdl+am - 1-n-:n:!--'i AoonenLt �P CITY OF RENTON m Red Flowering Currant I .11=11= �� "L^ITa'd°O�6A, 7E .nrrrna<ar or ruouc WORKS Vlbumum p.lom.1daum lelaacrtr emee armNO L DWAbA/e Vlbu IMOIe.rLL du. eorran OF Pn. Z Tune media'Bremer m YewO Deciduous Tree Planting ma -nee ,o„,y„ r,xan 9y V a Viburnum L'Spring Bouquet. = Spring Bouquet Viburnum Not to SCOIe w. MOON n NM me ammm ww sr,,r. _rmeoa—nrs` Ill .R•. .ff 2 e. 2 O. ° a 88 °8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ° ° 8 ,m-o • ••.''''''t"'''D - IliI IIII IIIIII II II II I I III III IIII IIII II II IIIII I III II IIII II I ,y,m.�E® ', r®�� ` III III IIIII IIII IIII III IIIII Q �� III � �� III �� III III��III �IIIIII IIIIII II .... , .- . .. • :_ •. `•� _,.�'.•.c, - WEST-ELEVATION i i ne-,r : .: 8 8 n • r ' •r �— a 4 ;yes P'nEe:�s FYpI [a R., •..,.. .. L - --- ---- — -- .WILL: ,� r .,,j . 'fill ., 3Qa PHI_ �IN �• 'ao.. • EAST ELEVATION . '8 '8' 8 ® a 8. a T. . - ,� o o S0,W (I,Y4CS I 1 I R n 7 .rn _ ICBM m , UTILITY ENCLOSURE NORTH ELEVATION ,n.--,•-r .no•-r-r ,�/O„ro roo�TCO ° °°88 8 8 0 " , 88 8'r .••4 . . • ED.., 0nr, r-- a• -- (NE iuti i,E:•.,i ,,,, ,r„rr,r�rr�r�rr III ,,,,�r7-,r�,�,rr - ,rrrrrr�rrmu 0 NOT USED — TT!� r, rr� �r IIII, ©p MATCH COLOR Of ADJACENT W.U. M ��{' �y11� OAK �Ia v' ���u sro-m.o.aso µ°BONDED NNrl BLACK.ALUM FENCE CO — ®_ I a4_ • �P p N°T USED — M IIIi1w =E1t l� I�m=se rn IIII i.0 I 1 p 1.0,44,•r.,ss,.w..rNTCO a - ff,, '� m'rim^ask= =• :�i:i1i ®,M I -I COLOR LEGEND o a a-0, - I-", {gN^s 0 M p E fo:,NrrF � � :� ::.•.® E'.rs.s:N'rAL fl x ME Tµ.�.mN.o. SOUTH ELEVATION O EDNc^ TILT-UP PANEL NALL ® wEN'¢wME,saaa2;Noe. 0 METAL ROOF PANEL ®, qcNPYe, ° p .�N © i.Op4;6...nru.ur x°x-uuuerTEs Enw sou(e.ss) •.M_',A p �c° T _ '® W,NM,•E: n:s,g°NT.srorN`ENT DOORS _ •�..,o . p COb60 LETIERS sawn (' 4 O,Na ® ,S � • - •,,-,,.•,..: N•Ise 0:rNaEDNN r ,.N. i„rSCN 9°SF) , EDN - �` �� hvu.♦p oME,wCa ,Ecwy: , ` .,® a-°'*sa,.o.Nirsor("I sn oIttl Q� �-) ,/ � , [-7 SME BCE• ..:. ®:o: ; wATED , =, ii�o . vM ,o m /� �� �� / aaBEYOND ": °: uO .hyaoe � ®a, a.7.�N T © x M x N ° Era .,®'..°kmo.C,rN0 0Nri ENCLOSNS FOR,lit LANCE EMFLEN,sm.,.(,x°) ® u u •Nse°uT(T,pc.y ,r,. � "°"Y,e..n-'T°n cExru sa a„rmN,a,rn... SECTION © trAt ® WALL MOUNTED MOT,,.n5E•,N CUT Off 04109, r-o- KEY NOTES THE HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. 5IJIE'inr.TO RENTON, WA IIIII I I I Sao.°°norv°° 01 e 15 02 6BASED ON SITE PLAN: #WA-131i 1. 1111111 . 111 Ea Enna! NM ►I till ta:S TJ El IEEE IVA All=■RN 0 MIW lMUM 1 5 1 0 1 RED HILL AVCNUE / SUITE 2 0 0 • T U S T I N, CALIFORNIA 9 2 7 0 0 • TEL 714 -2 S 9 •0 S 0 0 • FAX T 1 • • 2 5 9 •5 4 5 0 ()OM aasei 9 i_ (57 7-4 set siIagel sseippy ®A213Ad ' 11 RAMAC INC TRIM DESIGN AUTO CITY OF RENTON 3020 ISSAQUAH PINE LAKE RD SE 900 S GRADY WAY 200 MILL AVE S 1 ISSAQUAH WA 98029-7255 RENTON WA 98055-3231 RENTON WA 98055-2132 I GUINGUIS K.&HAIDY S.EL SHARAWY CHRYSLER REALTY CORPORATION BENJAMIN M.&PATRICIA KINLOW PO BOX 2561 800 CHRYSLER DR 4310 NE 5TH ST APT B104 , AUBURN WA 98071-2561 AUBURN HILLS MI 48326-2757 RENTON WA 98059-4764 - - - - ' I , HENRY &SANDRA FRIEDMAN ROBERT L.MOFFATT UNIVERSITY STREET PROPERTIE 8803 SE 78TH ST 3709 MEADOW AVE N PO BOX 811097 MERCER ISLAND WA 98040-5714 RENTON WA 98056-1551 ' I CHICAGO IL 60681-1097 ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY RENTON FUEL COMPANY L L C SOUND ENERGY PUGET 1 1 PO BOX 512485 4509 116TH AVE SE , ' PO BOX 90868 I LOS ANGELES CA 90051-04 5 BELLEVUE WA 98006-2757 BELLEVUE WA 98009-0868 r I PUGET WESTERN INC STATE OF WASHINGTON LENG SHENG HSU MEI YU TENG SUITE 310 0 1 1116 WINIFRED AVE BOTHELL WA 98011 II PASADENA CA 91107-5558 I 1 TAMMY S.TIMM ROWENA HUMANGIT MONILLAS JAMES &CAROLYN CODDINGTON I WILLIAMS AVE S#A I 536 WILLIAMS AVE S B 538 BURNETT RENTON WA 98055 1 RENTON WA 98055-2726 RENTON WA 98055-1405 1 , GERALD N.SPRAGUE CITY OF RENTON I 13430 SE 43RD PL 1055 S GRADY WAY 1 BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 RENTON? WA 98055 1 1 1 i 1 1 ' 1 1 I 1 1 1 ., ®09t5 aoo a2e1dwal asn - ` ="y11slaayS PaaJ ILMOWS I I p0 5 .i sasei s a a ssaa p ®A21 AV -.-,, 5. i siaq�l ssarppy ®AU3A., ' i RAMAC INC TRIM DESIGN AUTO CITY OF RENTON . ' 3020 ISSAQUAH PINE LAKE RD SE 900 S GRADY WAY 200 MILL AVE S ISSAQUAH WA 98029-7255 RENTON WA 98055-3231 RENTON WA 98055-2132 . GUINGUIS K.&HAIDY S.EL-SHARAWY CHRYSLER REALTY CORPORATION BENJAMIN M.&PATRICIA KINLOW PO BOX 2561 800 CHRYSLER DR 4310 NE 5TH ST APT B104 AUBURN WA 98071-2561 AUBURN HILLS MI 48326-2757 1 RENTON WA 98059-4764 HENRY &SANDRA FRIEDMAN ROBERT L.MOFFATT UNIVERSITY STREET PROPERTIE 8803 SE 78TH ST 3709 MEADOW AVE N PO BOX 811097 , MERCER ISLAND WA 98040-5714 RENTON WA 98056-1551 CHICAGO IL 60681-1097. ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY RENTON FUEL COMPANY L L C SOUND ENERGY PUGET ' , PO BOX 512485 4509 116TH AVE SE ' I PO BOX 90868 LOS ANGELES CA 90051-0485 BELLEVUE WA 98006-2757 BELLEVUE WA 98009-0868 • PUGET WESTERN INC I STATE OF WASHINGTON LENG SHENG HSU MEI YU TENG I SUITE 310 0 1 ' 1116 WINIFRED AVE BOTHELL WA 98011 PASADENA CA 91107-5558 1 I - I TAMMY S.TIMM ROWENA HUMANGIT MONILLAS JAMES &CAROLYN CODDINGTON WILLIAMS AVE S#A 536 WILLIAMS AVE S B 538 BURNETT I RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055-2726 RENTON WA 98055-1405 1 I GERALD N.SPRAGUE , i CITY OF RENTON 13430 SE 43RD PL 1055 S GRADY WAY 1 BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 1 RENTON WA 98055 , i , ®09IS JOJ eleldwal asp w±slaays paaJ gloows 61)091 S Joj alejdwal asfl I w,,slaags paaj gioows co -151 )5k 1>41116� 3800 W. Chapman Ave• Orange, CA 92868 ,�� (714) 940-3500 ��` ,1> WEN f PiA14 DE OF RE"'" J 1 2000 December 20, 1999 RECEIVED R� G Peter Rosen, Senior Planner City of Renton Development Services Division 6`h Floor City Hall 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mr. Rosen, As Bob Betts has told you, we have decided to withdraw our application for the Grady Way location. Unfortunately, our estimate of project development costs increased to the point at which this site is no longer feasible for us. We do appreciate the full cooperation given to our project team by you and your associates. I regret that we have had to come to a stop on this project given the warm reception we received at City Hall. Very truly yours, ()/a4,/ 7#1'‘-.4A Voier Jim Lyon Real Estate Manager West Coast Division JL/jh cc: Bob Betts USA vieps 36 USC 380 Proud Sponsor * 3800 W. Chapman Ave. "(2%.:,t VU Orange, CA 92868 ,s-• .N.'• _ - --'00 "' ..+.) ' - e lir e Peter Rosen, Senior Planner City of Renton Development Services Division 6th Floor City Hall 1055 South Grady Way U S A Renton, WA 98055 flhvpoo 36 USC 380 SW,StSSA.1:1/..;.:742. 113111iiiiiliiiillikilihiintillAilliMilliblillilitillii Proud Sponsor i 1 .) �1 3800 W. Chapman Ave• Orange, CA 92868 `�� � (714) 940-3500 1 '1 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON DEC 22 1999 December 20, 1999 RECEIVED Peter Rosen, Senior Planner City of Renton Development Services Division 6th Floor City Hall 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 • Dear Mr]Rosen, i As Bob Betts has told you,we have decided to withdraw our application for the Grady Way location. Unfortunately, our estimate of project development costs increased to the point at Which this site is no longer feasible for us. We do appreciate the full cooperation given to our project team by you and your associates. I regret that we have had to come to a stop on this project given the warm reception we received at City Hall. Ver2-ru ly yours, i Jim9 Real Estate Manager West Coast Division JL/jh • cc: Bob Betts USA yew 36 USC 380 Proud Sponsor r G +CO A V4 CIVIL ENGINEERING,LAND PLANNING,SURVEYING,ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES mC akJ n 11 ' �! Cs% 'w//' ' December 6, 1999 <r ��`y� COURIER DELIVERY � NG 'G Eo� Peter Rosen City of Renton Planning Department 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: Revised Documents for the Home Depot Facility koP S.W Grady Way and Talbot Road South, Renton, Washington C/Tye ENT p CA Our Job No. 6254 MN/NG Dee N '999 Dear Peter: I � I am writingto confirm our discussion on December 3, 1999, that the Cityof Renton agrees withQur slope g P analysis supplied to you on November 29, 1999, such that the area of proposed grading adjacent to Benson Road is exempt from the City of Renton Development Regulations Section 4-3-070F. Therefore, I am writing to request the withdrawal of our variance application submitted on November 5, 1999. Additionally, I am supplying you the following revised plans and documents, which I request to be switched out in the set of documents submitted to you on the same date: 1. Twelve copies of a Site Plan, revised dated December 1, 1999. 2. Twelve copies of a Grading and Storm Drainage Plan revised dated December 1, 1999. 3. One revised color display map of the Site Plan. 4. Twelve copies of a SEPA Environmental Checklist revised dated December 3, 1999. 5. Twelve copies of a Project Narrative revised December 6, 1999. 6. One 8 1/2-inch by 11-inch PMT reduction of the Site Plan and the Grading/Drainage Plan. In response to the additional issues you have raised, we are preparing responses to the following items: • The location of the historic coal mine hoist site on the opposite side of Benson Road from the subject development. • A supplemental geotechnical letter that indicates that no coal mine shafts or hazards related to past mining operations are present on the property. 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT,WA 98032 (425)251-6222 (425)251-8782 FAX www.barghausen.com y" Peter Rosen City of Renton Planning Department -2- December 6, 1999 • Additional information on the proposed retaining wall along the Benson Road frontage(we will be contacting Neil Watts to discuss what additional retaining wall detail the City would need to see beyond that discussed on pages 16 through 19 of the Geotechnical Engineering Services Report dated October 15, 1999, by GeoEngineers Inc.) Should you have any questions or comments regarding the enclosed materials,please contact me immediately at this office. Sincerely, Bruce K. Creager, AIC Director of Planning rvices BKC/sm 6254C.022 enc: As Noted cc: Jim Lyon, Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (w/enc) Brian Esplen, Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (w/enc) Michael Okuma, Greenberg Farrow Architecture, Inc. (w/enc) Bob Betts, Robert S. Betts, Inc. (w/enc) Glenn Amster, Lane, Powell, Spears, Lubersky (w/enc) Jeff Schram, The Transpo Group (w/enc) Mary Rutherford, GeoEngineers Inc. (w/enc) Bob Boyd, Puget Western, Inc. (w/enc) Jay S. Grubb, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. (w/enc) PWI DNNING ®P RENTON PugetWestern,Inc. 9 1999 19515 North Creek Parkway, Suite Bo }� � ��gy� Bothell, WA 98011 TEL(425)487-6550 FAX(425)487-6565 December 8, 1999 Mr. Peter Rosen City of Iltenton Development Services Department 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 RE: Site Plan Application Grady Way and Talbot Road, Renton,Washington Dear Peter: I understand Bruce Creager of Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. had a conversation with you regarding potential historical mining uses of the subject property. To the best of my knowledge, no mine shafts existed on the subject property which is all west of Benson Road. The historical hoist monument is located east of Benson Road and southeasterly of the proposed Home Depot site. Barghausen performed an ALTA survey/topo for Puget Western for all of its lands west of Interstate 405;the hoist structure is shown on the attached sketch. The hoist appears to be approximately 200 feet southeast from any grading that is anticipated to occur on the proposed Home Depot site(proposed Parcel 1 of City of Renton Lot Line Adjustment No. LUA-R99.53-LLA). We would expect that the westerly limits of historical mine shafts would be in the vicinity of Interstate Highway 405. Should you have any questions in this matter,please call me at(425) 487-6566. Sincerely, /(0- 1(7'14C R.B. Boyd President cc: Bruce Creager, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Bob Betts, Robert S. Betts Inc. oMt�l VA"... . . . i N �rc.o �Q S�o ;s - S f x f` Sk .'v MATCHLINE a SSMH 4' y i:,..' 'r'•; "F1 x h .. 1/111111 tt�::::�: ..fir::...:'. Y.,, ti5 / / / :.:... ... . v.< , y //// i//// . / + Ulf.:; ' : �::. ' ter: _ k •�� 4' / /� / :" // /% CHAIN LINK :; .:>:`: " V€`<='>'.:/ /.,;... . /� FENCE 4 / � �: :�' "yam o; �� // // :::::?:.. / Nit , , / / ./.. ..= 130.70 'j • 6 .�Y:. O /.igi,:'5 .i..0 / pi / cpti. .. \ 4, / i / /____...,,_,\ ..„ 04015,.19,, / .::iek.,./.r \ , , • :.,. // / A //� . , -///' / / ii- �,� f awl- �/ � '.:..... � ,�. m 2 i 447, . / j ice_ , :6, / / z./' w� fUY�W'E� y � V / / / // //4` l,' // / / I/1. �3 59 / �wi (Nc[isENGot, / ,i06a , a TRANSMISSION / / / '' x9"', / . TQWER LEGS / a 40 7 , / x"i7 // S C ALE 1' = 40 ,,,:. \". .\ \ -- ,,____ y / _.: /I / "/ O": R = a 9 86' - I A / / / = 120.91' /a >/ pr., / . o . P(crf/„.. i0°. f • • / PoH) F • / zOy ? 0 ' .- POWER WI GUYPWIRES ( �' . • 4. HA � U.i CIVIL ENGINEERING,LAND PLANNING,SURVEYING,ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 141� —mot t rr...2P cyst /f► , November 29, 1999 •G ErGitl- Peter Rosen RTM � r City of Renton Planning Department 1055 South Grady Way NOV 01999 Renton, WA 98055 BOLDING DIVISION RE: Slope,Analysis of the Home Depot Facility S. WI Grady Way and Talbot Road South, Renton, Washington Our J;ob No. 6254 Dear Peter: We have analyzed the slope areas of the Home Depot site at the above-referenced location in accordance with the slope formula contained in the City of Renton Development Regulations - Section 4-3-070C3ii, "Steep Slope Areas." Due to the ambiguous City definition of a "bench" (see below), we have performed two new sets of calculations, representing two scenarios: Scenario No. 1: These calculations assumed no "benches" greater than 15 feet between the contour intervals. Scenario No. 2: These conservative calculations assumed that any area where a 15-foot gap exists between the 2-foot contours could represent a "bench," and thus, these areas were subtracted from the total area, resulting in a higher average slope. The enclosed'exhibit shows the calculations for each scenario,and the resultant range of an average slope from 34 percent to 36 percent. The exhibit also shows the specific length of each contour line, the contour interval (2 feet),total area contained within the area studied,and the individual areas identified as potential"benches." The City of Renton defines bench as "a relatively level step excavated into earth material on which fill is to be placed"(City of Renton Development Regulations-Section 4-11-020). In fact, the bench areas excluded could represent gently sloping areas of up to 13 percent. In addition to the enclosed exhibits, we can also supply electronic file formats, if this will assist you in expediting your reviews. I would like ;to thank you in advance for your prompt review of the enclosed document. Once you have completed yoiur review,please call me to indicate your concurrence with this document so that we may revise our plans and documents for the Site Plan Approval Application. Sincerely, f6 • Bruce K. Creager, AICP Director of Planning Se ' es BKC/mm/jss [6254C.020] enc: As Noted cc: Jim Lyon, Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (w/enc) Michael Okuma, Greenberg Farrow Architecture, Inc. (w/enc) Bob'Boyd,'Puget Western, Inc. (w/enc) , Bob Betts, Robert S. Betts, Inc. (w/enc) Glenn Amster, Lane, Powell, Spears, Lubersky (w/enc) Jay S. Grubb, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. (w/enc) 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT,WA 98032 (425)251-6222 (425)251-8782 FAX www.barghausen.com 4-3-070C These regulations supplement but do not replace by observation on simple slopes, or the underlying zoning regulations for specific more precisely by the formula: properties.These regulations will provide respon- sible City officials with information to condition or S=100 I L deny public or private projects to protect poten- A �r tially hazardous areas and to avoid the necessity of preparing environmental impact statements in ii. Where "I" is the contour interval Z cases where there will not be significant adverse iraleat.but nod greater than ten feet environmental effects, thus expediting govern- (10'); "L" is the combined length of (, mental approval processes. the coritour ones in scale feet; and "A" iii 5 "A" is the net area between signifi- f' C. APPLICABILITY: cant changes in slope of the lot in square feet. 1. General: The actual presence or ab- sence of the criteria illustrated below in iii. A significant change in slope greenbelt areas,as determined by qualified shall be defined as a bench or pla- professional and technical persons, shall teau at least fifteen feet(15')in width. govern the treatment of an individual building site or parcel of land requiring compliance with these regulations. 2. Greenbelt Criteria: Greenbelt regula- tions apply to areas that are first designated as greenbelt on the City's Greenbelt Map and also identified as!containing one or more of the following physical criteria: a. Steep Slope Areas:Areas with slopes that exceed twenty five percent (25%). b. Physical Hazards: Areas identifi- able as a severe landslide hazard or ar- eas where other severe hazards are anticipated including erosion, seismic, flood, and coal mine subsidence. c. Utility Easements and Rights-of- Way: Major electricity,water and gas transmission'line easements and rights- of-way. d. Other Criteria:Wetlands, stream corridors, and flood control works. 3. Steep Slope;Areas: These regulations apply to land form features of a site between significant and identifiable changes in slope. a. Definitions: i. Slope shall be defined as the av- erage slope of the lot or portion thereof in percent between signifi- cant changes in slope, determined 3 - 16 4-3-070F . l • s• Q' 25' 30' `y l0r�:. 4 �' : ",; tl'� ::':.a;;;;',:'.".,, !}':^;. ...rawer',are .Ie�R1eI 6.A...' 7,1 . .•t.'i",,,'�4;;'S'N Ls ,'';`:"=.`rd.Y�.m..1z!, .�.a.i%i,`.',i.. M.lOM tit ar?l:n,, W^Lnz.. ::•'.i.'.. {�=;.A..,a :A+..':,7;T•;� kv. *,SS f� fi,i' M F.'w.:. ."—La S� '.�?i'���i! l<(.• :'h,%✓�V;! h'ti., t#3�� 4_ss�=,�"��-�e...1fMIrI a«Iwe r eIOM -' ..�F l ..erg.; . �..�.'!V �,`.Y:;:',7-`,iri 1. '� :fit- STEEPSLOPE AREA`•,; :.' :��/ 1y h.iC�- � '.�f.A�: .-sp x�.aa ,+' ry..�:er..& +: ,�;::•.�.. •`%zr ir ...rlj 'is"`�i4�3'�` q �F.:k:d1'.i� �'�*�+•.��L:�...{�-.���?^h �,T::. f.• 4%' $.sue +..� .X Iti,�. s.' ut �: '• i¢.� :�,y,„OII't4. '=;' is„ice}.�y.yV,..'..,.:; e>^i 3+: -.:its .-44. ':w;. '"`,•d':SY4'..' -...,r£ ti.=-.iti,.r;':::k+:I.. : ... y ss n '''-5),Cq(:,x :,^! ip '.Awr.`." '' `v`u:..Ir/reffl rf ., ;Kp`4.iCtL �v.�i ? r .i4, _ • I ' f 20 25' )1' . ca.rpu«1r1. e.errcA.r c«wree r eawr 2S- j , 1 If001L 3�� Slopes/n Percent . A 2 1 le.e fMA« A ....W.',C.AA4111.I N A I. T. k----STEEP SLOPE AREA O r r r 0 ZS' S0' TS' fC C' 125' r p.,p• , «rllfeOrl/MI/I.C. D. ALLOWANCE FOR CONSTRUCTION permit, conditional use permit, variance, re- OF SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE: zone, planned unit development, subdivision Nothing ir these regulations shall limit the con- or short subdivision, and one or more of the struction of one single family home on a pre-exist- greenbelt criteria as defined in subsection C2 ing platted lot,subject to meeting any engineering of this Section is present on the site of the requirements necessary to safely construct such proposed development, studies by qualified a residence.Whenever a proposed development professionals may be required.The City shall involves only one single family dwelling, which is send written notification to the applicant not part of a larger development proposal, the whenever such studies are required.The City City shall not require special studies or reports by may approve, approve with conditions, or the applicant. deny any such proposal to carry out the pur- poses of this Section. E. GENERAL STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO ALL GREENBELT PROPERTIES: F. ADDITIONAL STANDARDS FOR STEEP SLOPES: 1. Permit Required Prior to Vegetation Removal: There shall be no removal of veg- 1. Development Prohibited on Steep etation within a greenbelt until a permit is is-, Slopes: Development is prohibited on slopes sued pursuant to subsection E2 of this greater than forty percent(40%). Section except for normal maintenance with written approval by the Development Ser- 2. Density Limitations for Steep Slopes: vices Division for such activities as trimming In greenbelt areas with between twenty five of vegetation or removal of dangerous or dis- percent(25%) and forty percent(40%) slope eased, plant materials. the maximum residential density shall be: 2. Special Studies: Whenever a proposed a. One unit per acre, and for each one development requires a building permit, grad- percent(1%)of slope in excess of twenty ing permit,shoreline substantial development five percent(25%), an additional nine 3 -17 4-11-020 flood". Designation on flood mapsin-g always BOARDING OR LODGING HOUSE:A dwelling chides the letters A for V. (Ord. 4071, 6-1-1987) or part of a dwelling other than a motel or hotel, where lodging with or without meals is provided BEDROCK: The in'place solid rock. for compensation, and boarding rooms do not contain kitchen facilities. BENCH:A relatively level step excavated into earth material on which fill is to be placed. (Ord. BOAT LAUNCHING RAMP:A facility with an in- 2820) dined surface extending into the water which al- lows launching of boats directly into the water BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES: Conserva- from trailers. Shoreline Master Program (Ord. tion practices or systems of practices and man- 3758, 12-5-1983, Revised 7-22-1985 (Minutes), agement measures that: 3-12-1990 (Resolution 2787), 7-16-1990 (Reso- lution 2805) and 9-13-1993 (Minutes) and Ord. A. Control soil loss and reduce water quality 4716, 4-13-1998) degradation caused by nutrients, animal waste, toxins and sediment; BODY SHOP:Establishments which conduct any of the following operations: B. Minimize adverse impacts to surface water and groundwater floYv,circulation patterns,and to A. Collision services, including body, frame or the chemical, physical and biological characteris- fender straightening, repair, or replacement; tics of wetlands; and and/or C. Includes allowing proper use and storage of B. Overall painting of vehicles or painting of ve- fertilizers/pesticides. (Ord. 4346, 3-9-1992) hides in a paint shop, but excluding minor paint- ing with an airbrush or roller brush utilized in BLOCK:A group of lots, tracts, or parcels within customizing or detailing operations; and/or well defined and fixed boundaries. (Ord. 4522, 6-5-1995) C. Welding, molding, and similar operations conducted on vehicles. (Ord. 4715, 4-6-1998) BLOCK:A block consists of two(2) facing block fronts bounded on two(2) sides by alleys or rear BORROW: Earth material acquired from an off- property lines and on two(2) sides by the center- site location for use in grading on a site. (Ord. line of platted streets, with no other intersecting 2820, 1-14-1974) streets intervening. Where blocks are unusually long or short, or of unusual shape, block length BOTANICAL GARDENS:A public or private fa- shall be determined by address ranges. (Ord. cility for the demonstration and observation of the 4651, 1-27-1997) ' cultivation of flowers, fruits, vegetables or orna- mentalII 1 [��l � � I � .�J l i�I I I I I 1 Hit It plants. Block Front BOULEVARD: A broad thoroughfare with land- I 11 . 1 I 1111IIIG - 11 scape, sidewalk or pedestrian improvements, of- 1 1. I I. 1 1 11„1/' 1 ten with a landscaped median or center divider, 1 I I ! �! that functions as a linear open space. -1] I + I IIiiii1L1 ' 1 I BREAKWATER:A protective structure, usually _ Ill 1 I' 111 ' • Bleckr,,nats> built off-shore for the purpose of protecting the Property Line Opposing Black Frans shoreline or harbor areas from wave action. BLOCK FRONT: A block front means the front- BUFFER AREA:A strip of land identified by a age of property along one side of a street bound plan or ordinance to separate one type of land use from another land use that is incompatible. on three (3) sides by the centerline of platted streets and on the fourth side by an alley or rear BUFFER SCREEN: A strip of land containing property lines. (Ord. 4651, 1-27-1997) fences, berms, trees, shrubs and other landscap- ing that obscures one land use from another. 11 -6 Q �� CIVIL ENGINEERING,LAND PLANNING,SURVEYING,ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES mQ t o` i November 16, 1999 nonaopmENT pLpNIt111dG la, N y Facsimile: (425) 430-731 a OF RENTO ~G EivG�N��� Nov 1 4 1999 Laureen Nicolay ';EE�VED City of Renton Development Services Department 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: Revised Site Data for the Home Depot Facility Grady Way and Talbot Road, Renton, Washington Our Job No. 6254 Dear Laureen: As requested, I am faxing to you revised site data for the above-referenced Home Depot facility. This site data has been revised to reflect the required 10-foot landscape setback along all street frontages,the minimum and maximum parking requirements, and the number of parking stalls attributed to the seasonal outdoor sales area. Furthermore, the area calculations have been revised for the "natural area" to include only those areas adjacent to Benson Road that will remain undisturbed as a part of this development; these areas amount to 56,000 square feet. There.are other,areas on the development,plan that are not proposed for development at this time, such as the future pad at the northwest corner of the site,adjacent to the Grady Way/Talbot Road intersection, and the residual property at the southwest corner of the site, that are proposed to remain as is. Should you have any questions regarding this, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Bruce K. Creager, Director of Planni ,.t-ervices BKC/mm/ph 6254C.019 cc: Jim Lyon,Home Depot U.S.A.,Inc. (w/enc) Brian Esplen,Home Depot U.S.A. Inc. Michael Okuma,Greenberg Farrow Architecture,Inc. (w/enc) Bob Betts,Robert S.Betts,Inc. (w/enc) Glenn Amster,Lane,Powell,Spears,Lubersky(w/enc) Jeff Schramm,The Transpo Group,Inc. (w/enc) Bob Boyd,Puget Western,Inc. Jay Si; Grubb,,Barghausen Consulting Engineers,Inc. (w/enc) 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT,WA 98032 (425)251-6222 (425)251-8782 FAX www.barghausen.com ~1,2wrr / NN ` 24' x� � -.'1. 3i � 12 13 D VEL••k EN� 0 0 1 AREA 3 •80,£Z.9tiN 18 7 / EXIST. P•" - 1 jOEASY ' ' . /, dOls 20 �- RE-. . • ew --8 21 9: 171.51 N NE / d� 21 21 dais � 22 : ..- 111*s 22 1 dOil 0 // bfriz11 N / / , :_________.__...„„..,;,„..,_ _ , 30, __:_,__47......1 I..........._......: 74:0 ilivo Mialia......_ ilir Al / 7A.i tillir 4. rr•• •ENTIFICA : q*, , SIGN �'� _ •• • LANDSCAPE PROPOSED ENTRY _ • NEW PED ;``� /- •'S (TYP.) BUILDING HEIGHT: A, • A ALLOWED: 50 FEET --- ��► PROPOSED: 36 FEET TO ROOF DEC SLOPES OVER 40%: 20,000 SF TOTAL 5,980 S.F. TO BE ALTERED ------___ —__7/ WETLAND AREAS: SEE PLAN PARKING ANALYSIS: REQUIRED- 131,854 SF x 4 STALLS/ 1,000 S.F. MIN.) = 527 MIN. (131,854 SF x 5 STALLS/ 1,000 S.F. MAX.) = 659 MAX. PROVIDED: 612 (39 IN OUTDOOR SEASONAL SALES AREA) - ACCESSIBLE (ADA) STALLS REQUIRED: 12 1 ACCESSIBLE (ADA) STALLS PROVIDED: 12 ,' �) LOADINGIZH SPACES: 40' xIT100'5LUMBER LOADING (GROUND LEVEL) 65' x 155' LOADING/MANUEVERING (DOCK—HOGH) GHq`S CIVIL ENGINEERING,LAND PLANNING,SURVEYING,ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES nyj_ ;___-ems 2 sG j/ �� November 11, 1999 PMENT•PLANNING <NIG ENGiN�� - CITY OF RENTON NOV1519 RECEWED Peter Rosen City of Renton Development Services Department 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: Request for Administrative Driveway Modification for the Proposed Home Depot NEC - South Grady Way and Talbot Road South Renton, Washington Our Job No. 6254 Dear Peter: Regarding the Site Plan Approval/SEPA/Variance Application filed Friday, November 5, 1999, we are requesting that.the City of.Renton approve an administrative driveway modification for the proposed 36-foot-wide driveway on the south'leg.of the Williams Avenue/South Grady Way intersection. This 36-foot-wide driveway will accommodate one incoming lane and two exiting lanes, each 12 feet wide. The two exiting lanes will include one right-turn lane and one-left turn lane, which will assist in reducing the queuing length of the outgoing traffic, and improving the level of service and efficiency of this intersection. Further, this design is supported by the fmdings contained in the Traffic Impact Analysis by The Transpo Group, dated November 1999. Should you have any questions regarding this request, please contact me at this office. Sincerely, Bruce K. Creager, AIC Director of Planning ices BKC/jss/mm 6254C.017 cc: Jim Lyon, Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (w/enc) Briani Esplen, Home Depot U.S.A. Inc. Michael Okuma, Greenberg Farrow Architecture, Inc. (w/enc) Bob Betts, Robert S. Betts, Inc. (w/enc) Glenn Amster, Lane, Powell, Spears, Lubersky (w/enc). - - Jeff Schramm, The Transpo Group, Inc. (w/enc).. Bob Boyd, Puget Western, Inc. Jay S. Grubb, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. (w/enc) 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT,WA 98032 (425)251-6222 (425)251-8782 FAX www.barghausen.com Peter Rosen From: Elizabeth Higgins To: Jennifer Toth Henning; Peter Rosen Subject: Home Base Date: Monday, November 08, 1999 3:51 PM The Renton Coal Mine Hoist Foundation, a registered historic site (state list) is located about 50 yards south of City Hall on the east side of Benson Road. Page 1 ganized in Renton including parades through town,pic- imperial architect of Russia. The building was built be- ___, 5. nics at parks, races and ball games for children, and tween 1940 and 1942. It is considered Renton's most public dances with band music. noted example of Moderne (or Art Deco) architecture. • The building houses the Renton Historical Museum The major annual event in recent years has been the and Historical Society. It is placed on the Washington ; Renton River Days festival, held in the middle of Au- State Register of Historic Buildings. gust. Various ball games, tournaments, races, exhibits, public dances with live music, musical performances, 3. Renton High School contests,a parade,and banquet are offered in the festi- 400 South Second val to the general public. �. Renton High School was constructed in 1932 as an ad- :;.:,: :.." :'"+`:�ti?7 dition to the original high school which was later razed. � [:istat�c. :r�eservatlon :. :. z` M ; . .;.:- It was designed by William Mallis of Mallis & Dehart I architects. The building incorporates Tudor and Gothic There are a number of historic buildings and sites in architectural styles in its tower and flanking wings. The Renton which date back to the early days of the City. building is situated on five acres of the original The following partial list includes buildings which were Smithers homestead and is still being used as a high considered historically significant and an inventory school today. which was compiled under the Historic Preservation Program within the Cultural Resources Division of 4: Henry Ford School — King County Parks and Recreation Department. 416 Wells Street Historic Buildings and Sites The Henry Ford Elementary School was built in 1922 to replace the adjacent Central School which had been • w 1. Historic Renton Coal Mine Hoist Foundation built in 1892. The School was in use as a south Renton .. 1,000 feet south of intersection of Grady Road and elementary school until 1970. The Henry Ford School Benson was converted to the Renton School District offices. It I is a significant building for the valuable role it played in iii A commemorative plaque has been placed on the north the School District's and the City's early history. wall of the hoist foundation. The inscription is as fol • - lows: 5. The Melrose Tavern 819 Homer Way South "Dedicated to the hundreds of miners who worked in this mine from its discovery in 1873 by Originally the eastern portion of the first floor of the • E.M. Smithers, to its closure in 1920. This is the Melrose Hotel, the Melrose Tavern was built as a part T foundation of the hoist used to haul.coal-filled of the Melrose Hotel and Tavern by Ben Atkinson with cars up from the main slope. From its entrance money he made in Alaska during the Klondike Gold now under the freeway, it descended east at 12 Rush. The Milwaukee Railroad used to run along g degrees for over a mile, branching over 22 times. Houser Way. The Melrose was a favorite place for The mine was ;operated by the Renton Coal Co. travelers to drop in for an overnight stay or shorter rest - until 1886, the Renton Cooperative Coal Co. until at the tavern. During Prohibition, the Melrose Tavern 9 1901,then the Seattle Electric Co. until 1920, over changed its beverages to near-beer and continued to 1,300,000 tons,of coal were removed during the operate with card games and pool table in full use. The 110 life of this mine." hotel portion burned in the 1920's and the tavern con- tinued to operate. Alterations to the tavern's interior 2. Renton Fire Station have been minimal and many of its original interior l features are retained. .J 235 Mill Avenue South • The Renton Fire Station was designed by Ivan M. Palmaw, a Russian immigrant and nephew of the last J �. s 7 1 . i. s < ..... .. : ., ,., • +s fib`..-t. t .., ... -- ...;ati..?y.L'A. - -.:.e.. •isa.•::.a•.r,.:.;;. l�;s ( Fitt ce.4i' was tom.; w a s „ r_ _ 3 FtILLes N--.91 ram_ ' '`"�' NEWCASiTLE CEMETERY,Southwest of 69th Way and 129th intersection (10/10/80) • ;Newcastle,PACIFIC COAST COMPANY HOUSE NO. 75, North of Renton at 7210 138th Street Southeast (NR 12/21/79) North Bend, CAMP NORTH BEND,45509 Southeast 150th Street (NR 4/29/93) North Bend, CEDAR FALLS HISTORIC DISTRICT,20030 Cedar Falls Road SE (NR 7/9/97) North Bend,NORTH BEND RANGER STATION,42404 SE North Bend Way(NR 3/6/91) North Bend vicinity, NORMAN BRIDGE,Old 428th Avenue Southeast,across the North Fork,Snoqualmie River (NR 7/19/94) *North Bend vicinity, SNOQUALMIE PASS WAGON ROAD,At Denny Creek (12/9/70) *Redmond,MARYMOOR FARM DUTCH WINDMILL,6046 Lake Sammamish Parkway Northeast (4/20/73) Redmond, THE YELLOWSTONE ROAD, 196th Street between Fall City Highway and 80th Northeast (NR 12/2/74) Redmond vicinity,JAMES W. CLISE HOUSE,6046 Lake Sammamish Parkway Northeast (NR 6/19/73) Redmond vicinity,MARYMOOR PREHISTORIC INDIAN SITE,6046 West Lake Sammamish Parkway Northeast (NR 11/20/70) *Renton,RENTON COAL.MINE HOIST FOUNDATION,South of Benson Road and Grady Way intersection (12/5/75) *Renton,RENTON FIRE STATION, Houser Way and Mill Avenue (11/17/78) *Renton,RENTON SUBSTATION,SNOQUALMIE FALLS POWER COMPANY, 1017 South Third Street (11/19/82) Seattle, 12TH AVENUE SOUTH BRIDGE, Dearborn Street (NR 7/16/82) Seattle, 14TH AVENUE SOUTH BRIDGE,Spans Duwamish River (NR 7/16/82) **Seattle,ADVENTURESS(SCHOONER],Lake Union Drydock (NHL 4/11/89) Seattle,ALASKA TRADE BUILDING(UNION RECORD BUILDING), 1915-1919 First Avenue (NR 5/6/71) • *Seattle,ALEXANDER HALL,SEATTLE PACIFIC COLLEGE,Seattle Pacific College campus (12/9/70) *Seattle,ALKI BEACH PARK,65th Southwest to 58th Southwest (12/9/70) Seattle,ALKI POINT LIGHT STATION,Tip of Alki Point off Alki Beach Avenue Southwest(NR 1977) Seattle,ARBORETUM SEWER TRESTLE,26th Avenue East at Washington Park (NR 7/16/82) • *Seattle,ARCHITECTURE HALL(BAGLEY HALL), UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON,University of Washington campus (12/9/70) Seattle,ARCTIC BUILDING,306 Cherry Street (NR 11/28/78) Seattle,ASSAY OFFICE(GERMAN CLUB),613 Ninth Avenue (NR 3/16/72) Seattle,AURORA AVENUE(GEORGE WASHINGTON MEMORIAL)BRIDGE,WA 509 Aurora Avenue (NR 7/16/82) *Seattle, BAKER STREET HOUSE,2002 Northwest 60th Street (2/18/98) Seattle, BALLARD AVENUE HISTORIC DISTRICT, Ballard Avenue from Northwest Market to Northwest Dock Street (NR 7/1/76) • 26 \ \ -.. - _ 4 r‘f\ \ \� • 1 • , t l . . ' '•' • i . �I. ;11 ti__I•^� • e1 \ / ..I. t, t• 1'1 L,----_�▪' ..� 1 , Mlll' 1ll ii ' ' • y: ►Ti91 S a { .. . :.:.•611 ....•. ' .. .. .1N....1...: .......,,. .\::,...".,,,..•.•,....... • ' :. :.i. ''''..:.'. • 2.,•:. • - 1-1.......:•,Iti• . -1..1' •- -. . oat . . :.•., .-Gs 7, r- . • • ::.. . . /, ... ., . . :. _ • , ..,., :.. • /.... . . • 1 . 1... ... , .. . / . • •• , 1 •,...,.,fr • .7 • ••• . .::: ••;•'. ;.:,I..---....-•.-- i.:•:,:1,,,,,' :..'i• .2' I•iiI•:' :,:: . .. . \,,L \%1\1 N.. ‘.' . • fir, :.. ox a 07 ci;�i°xa A �� u :` of=zY a . ` ..-1 —�7 R�1 D. < • f 1 — — la—'r, I I. •.r) ;t 1.Q� 4. .;,1�4. •:••Fen.' • • • • • I f�411.31N1. • • 1 ='i ni vl is• 4. .•L ,o'{ :'e :'« C? 1 •5T•' Jr`• I' •` - • j: �In'no iv3�..s �� •. 1', / ► � ' ' le a. ':'4, -:_:; .); JY.;\ . . "'. .A : 1 ':1a; , ‘:., • I• •••••.•.. .. . '' . s7 •••• • •-... •'• '' • • 1- '••••• • •''•••• • ' • 1./..' ,/1;•••''. ' •• . • .0. • ••:, . ,•-' •.• '? '.':••„'%,•:•.,1"••;•t•-: _ Is) ill:114 • • • ... --ve , . . • ..". 1'. i • i 0, • . ... : ,.. .. ' \ , ! ... . , -.iii /- •.. .. .:,:. ,.: ! .:.,: • -• .,. ,j. :••. . :..... ,..': .;',...,'Ii'd•••'.i'llf..-..!:":1'.,..I. '.:::',...':.`.''::::,;:,..c.:;'.',....:.'..,.:,;,_.....„...,,::-.::- r.• • .., 1 ri.. . 1 ., .., . . , .s..4.,0- . •-,...s..A 1,10.ti..„...,. .,...••:.:iii; .. 7.-., • .,;.t:kiwi ....,,..,..1,•;2,..,, -....-- .., -.-▪ --, ....,....;, ,,;_0: •;„....,,,_,... 21..., , 1 ,i .i. :_ ,. ... . • .. . ..; tier . . ..1 . . ..,, ,• ,. .. ....: .. 1 1....4re. ........• „ • ...... :,..:.4,.,............• ,L....: .-• • ..; / . 1 y /� , ``� I' :. I'. ,.. ,), �.�l'e :ate/ : �,' .;_;,ti ,;I ,;::,. 1. / .S� • • • � .- ,,' 'fI•' a� 1N. '' ; 1!1� ;`�'7[i°f I,:i".�`(�;,;•-,, l;,,'•a' t 1 1 1. .I ' .; 1 1 .. 1 •1•I:.I' V �`' �'i :,' sr''L••. c:. ,,p '1•.'�V ,) .i.'S'� :-( ti'•. ►r 9 i 1: ( .I. :I. is 1 :�• P /'",�.' ,i= ,�;,,-- , ,,`'z▪ ,,'1.: _ ` I �_• t • •it•a� i— j __Ste — • • •. _ - M'I'l1 _•T• ti I. 1`,' , =}+•_ '• I ii I L. ;%� 1• iJ,. 1,:.`.r �j / I1jkII t` ..tea t • •'J IYr .I/! LI I •ly 1 �' �" i, ;� :I f:'`: JI ..... ,_: ...4:41.. 3.),......173.3 - •T,,I. - ,-.31.)- ,-i .1 • 4‘, .07. ;41.C, -.:'. ./^7.al.; %.%. 4_.14. : : Tr.:VII. .. '•';* "` ZZ ••• I I • -• • • I • . I • • i ' I 'I - . et lil';fitt '7 ',i,'V'ili'': 'MI* . Ein ' - 441 ' 1;g 3. - 2V=C:1.:/'''t .,• :oe' "•• .i'• 1....11:11.11--!•.1-•,' ;Y ',TA- .. %..--..,..;0.i. ,,,e,_ '..,• .._ ..... )1 i', u Am rpm . „..,,,, _ „.- ., . I i ,i I. • ".? ......• • . . . . '41,11S, Illiaidso> 4 VW ... te Ir.A I % ,,,-,- TA , ...p-T. a poi atm. ••• 're, - . ;.,4lzi t % 2 W" iltek 1$., 1.„tGird gi,, 41iiii: . ,,,, ... ,.L.,• ,.....; ..... oe , . 0/-1 , , ., al S 1-:t c .z.,'icdt'a 'w %.• .1._.-:.1 1.. , ,., _t"4.' . PettlAPP..,''st-rz7-='7.- ,T2-----NFI.c,111 AF,014111;7111t15 '•' ,..y..',..77 7 i.illai 'pi . 61E1E8 .tra..- flt/him 'i.-; .,.• , NO'--4.6.,"1, .. -I "'1 I.*-1.' 1. - . ''''''''''f".. ..'"" :!.-..' ,..„ra T--... .I r fib't I *1 'II . '''t-l• '''''''. ittVP,.-;••'-'' '6.- i •Sig is •.1. , , : 14 % mi ‘ ......--x• 1.---," 1 • "I i•! {-- • "-awliiii ..e..' iv117-,,'•'',..„ -':-.---,'-t4,-v..,',..--,., ,-4--.... ,.,.-1.:. -:_,ii.I-. . I.,* ,• , 17.°'I .. . :.,, .-,,-„.71`, .,-"L !-.'-,-.,.!a. if..,„;1:,.:1,--'. ' ...-t. I,-.' . I I e'°'--"tt."'III.I.44e4. 't•1'•I ''.I 5'..';',L.'t,• 1I-.A..-r*If','-,-'1I'I'..1,. IIIIi. I In I ' "I. '' . - I,I! 'I 'I'I ..I - r .: .....,:-II:vc-,,l'ow, l'14.-''.4. ..f.w'rii''',i1P.-,,,,v,i,:. ;t:/1-.;;:-4 . '...-;'d'"••'r ',..1 .1 ,1.; ' '... • ' !'; .1 1; . ,,i0,•:,..,- !..¢PIA, q,•t- A ''. ,.7, '•t•It'i".•.,' .:--''!•'J'' .. •_:'i',•1'...., i!i• :., . . I • l' ' LI ' ' ' .• • I„ . ''' fn-iir• Q titd. 1/4•,,,•.-4•L'-,---.,,',,.. %.'1,1. -11,III:I,' ! -• - •1-I I - 1 ' • -..!'..:14"I i-I 1.;:,.,,V.T:I"=Ii4II-411:61eil: 1,. 1•,-.: =i.:1;1,::.'.1.:1 1r•-, •.',.-.i ,1-.. ',--'.• , . . . .1 11 .1 1 1 1 • , 1 1• . . I " . 1 • ,.,'1,1,.;,,,1:4:141,*„,1',7.z,„'• 1•11::,',14„..i„,;!+,;(;.(..1..i:.:.. ,11,; .--,;,1-,-,::: -:111--.,i,' .i..7.1: is,,111-.',11,-1',.:,]''':•!,..,..... . .- :1 I! •I L , 1- , I- , , ! .„ .,,L?it*,w,,,1•711„,:,:14,...,,v.,.-•'' 'i s.7'+ . .-rs.,..-,.'' V s:ss,.1": , 1411, 11. i s' s_Ls .- . , A.! :; 'I ,. • ' . •rk..w.,.! ,.,,,. . -.,. '.*,,,-•'':, . 1.;`, ,. , ', :.- .'''-'1*. • 'I-- , -r'% , f I •, / i • /Vil 0 f I - ''' ----ru ci' , u, - - I; -ap ' • -•. .,;, ..,,,„,...•,•,.., ....,...,..:•,,,,itt , •3....,,-ty.,,,,,.....,. . •, ,,•, .. .._,.,,,,...,.. • ,,- . i - .1 • . . •• - : ! . .,•..:••,,,,i,..„;.. •.;5..,,c1...,;„:• ,.. i.0:14,-..,.,.;-,.1'I'14-,,,;..,..-i-L--,:''.',_• .,.• i,;•. . . . - . , :-:‘,..'.'''It.,•r,:-.':.-71 ‘:''' ,.;e,;•Itili'•t,";0N:''CI :: l'i OAL". •.ri 1' ' ,1 ' :.: I •' ...7'Yt.':';:• :,i':: .:.'. 0,..i----11 '';;.'1 .•' :2;'-•';1.' •:. -";;'-'::!•••.- 1''--. '''' ' 'I- ri I ' •i - ! r • • 1 ig A A ,... ..A4-4,-,pi,t,•...,:,:..- -• A ;;;--.:...r,.:-..,:,., ,,," -,,,,,,:,,,,,.:;,,,-.-...,,,, ,.,, .;1.1.,L,..-,-;.,• i I,• , i. , ,,., ,_,,,,,,, to, ,N i• ,,-,,, , ,. ..,...,;. .,1 „.,,,, ,.. - ! • ' ,,-., 4.,-• C `1'•-•'•1',-:.••• i'Ay.1.`•••;:i ,, ,. 04 L 670A1PIIA/r 1 ,., .:L:L' : -,---; i, .,-, •-4;- . '.-1 - --1 -0',.- •:. '-.' - '-:••:!' ..' •',' '. • ' '•i i r .-.1' • 1 : ' ' ,4,., !..--, `',.. 1.,,Y:..,...r.,,:.1.71`',.-,.:,vZ.ii!-; ,,.f..•.; ,- ;•.1'; 1-..... -1.-- 1 1,. F:--''.'..:.;:.. .. '. • ,y-. i 1 i 1 i,-.!• ' .. ,. • . , . ..,..-.!.....,t..--; ''',t'''''iI a NI:_:`_1r,!-.,--!.•..-1,--:ir"!-;;,1': , ,--• i'• 'i'l :'.; ;': .. ' 1 I[ .I. ' 1;';',- ,' i '-, '' ' '• , ......„4..3..s.,,;,..,,,it..113',"I't,..;.,,'„'' •3:::,1"4;'',.-I 14 '''; ./..)'.` :.' '' ,' ; i - ..c% I'. I. j'r,!. ,;,'., •,,,.1 . '' 1, • ,'•- '.'7;',t11-''1,:'-;..!S'i'.:eil.!;1450.404).1.- '' ...I ''-'.,.i,1 • : , ' 0.-,4'71AP`4V;;..:4' ,,„4; , •,;'.%L.. ,ri,4r.:' ''.. .0 7:-',.11.),;,"'.; ;., ..;.C,.7.7.7 :1 -..' .- ti' ' I'k.,-.:': ' ' 2' ';''..:' : : ' t -,'.: ,:1 1".. ':ei,,i-,,,,,,- ,`:,,-;i: .•-q-:;11 l'4.,,'';'.1',i1 .''''.,-;:; ..,:•;j,'..;''...'r,'':-..‘.T ;..::?::::!il,.- i..Tv '-.:' ', --": s'r:-.l'• '. ' .11 L: '. - ' ''' : ; • •' itt-14 . '.-4::',4;-,,r'•-*:I.,.. - ,'i'7,74.*Iii!",-,L•',..,:•.`,,'.;-$''',1=:-;'1:•.,r;t:'I- -,-;1: •:1,., ,,,-II:II,:'.r''- :SI•.-, '•,.1- -';I,.. ,'. i-t I '., : .1 .' • ' ,• ,-.„ ' " . . '..,'Ve,::*0 •:r.,P'•1'.-;.:•'-`-',:,.::,:;,'Y',1:-.-,. 4:•••,'„.1i_i, 't ,' , J:.-...t!,j •,:•• •-, fo.';.,-,.r•,:,, d _L• 1,- ••,.. - 3, -.1 i.,,..1 :' •, 7 .1 • , /3.r-T E"o' 1. ...,...,4),.. ...i.!,4: ...i.,t._,,...,,,...,,,-- .r,-,-,;,-.- : .e7,A.I..,.0.!...:.-.,reAlipp,,, ., •• 1 • .,-. .:. : •L- . , : .1 1 : ;i-AattalaCC,Om• . ., . r•r,, '-:•• ',.,11;.1 • '',1--.:ii -1 ' .' ''' - -!..'. .t• ! • il . ..•,.-. . . ,... r--ri,..'..t-I,1 li1,5---, ,,.','4-I•:,,- n. .. ' I..I' 4-'.;:-.; ',I ,i! , . -. ,•I ,, ..,, ' ,, -..:'..c. 1 i-4,-"'..,...r.1..,.., r.. -Lor1••',' ,-.•,:' r,v' :, :•• ' - . • --'.', .-, • -I I- ,'•,.• -•'-•f ''' '"I •• • '1 ''''''''1, -'4§' i•"''',;,5-''''': '4 .-1`1';',''':11''-';,:t'-',',Ft iSi`-,'•t.',.,I.T..1“,-.1,- -.41'',f!--'. J. • ;... oi ; ,:•,-,..: ..ti Atit--.-..r.-V711;.;:'.':1'',-.":::'11.;.i..',.h,.1.",•Ci1pHi llgn r4...r1 1 (7 _.....o,,•- . .,n•,-:...,r_.-",itv,.,:{•,-;,' 1.1„,..%.in}, t-.. ,t,, I ,'.„ , , .,I _ , P'l pf,4*.v.Kin ,.:„..c,kv,c4r1.4.r.,,.., ,,..„7 ,!•,9t, .,•.•-4 .• . ,L' ' I.I' • : ' • ' ji ' ' '42,f) -II •-•• 6 ... , .4 ,,',11..:i.- , ,' ...i:.t - 2,4,,...., ,4','L .i',' 'sj;;;; .'':'''' '!'',. i; ;...', .).;':'.-6,,,fr..V.;'''t."''.'•CtS''';t:-'.11mii J Ill,' ' .:5•.:-.1--,y,4';-.-p'. 445,-• ., .....".,,:.:4..,.'::4;',).:!:.,1,1'-i•I'''1 1. 14. .1: .• c -I • .•',-, _ ' 1 , .....-,10,:r.,4,.. f',1':1,. •;,-,iik..'t)-4,,,,,;., ,,,,•,,,riri,,:, -s-.1,st..,,....s'.,1_,J s',,rijts.,, ft, tsit,.''"s%Vzis:j1,;.;".s•'•i..s 1 .' 111s, si's r'. 1.• 1:1:: 1 -H:l."."!" lib • i isist• .1. '' ,. ',,: 4. S'''t .1,!.,: so; .• 1 • -SAD\-., , ,, A- ,4'' " •'", s 4,'' '' -- r, Z 1 T -„, .1. j .:, ,, • ,I--- .. ...:,..„.0.1,, .. il: „i •i ,•• ,„.1,,,•••;,•,•:.,,„,,,II.ri..,t ,,-,I. .cp,....I, • rt 16,6,',.:"•&, ..,,i.,:•,•Ti,,,..4:11,•,. ..-1.`1,.:,• 1- 'i'• .1 -,, c; _1.J j- .-,, '• , - • . ,'`..T.!,.q.,- :1 .:e;,42.4-• `.,:•••41,'.1:.1',3;:;•: 1:'..-i,"(-t..5f.:. ' &' ,..60.111;•sii,';'''''.1'-'-'q•41•-•,''',Uit''''1.51:4`1 ,''';''"f" .1' I : '''','-'-., I • ''• I .L''' 1' ' ':' ''"•r;:.t.:-T.'4.1krir:i...;f.41N1 ,:-'•:•-1: ,4'0I.'" .,• -:• a.*e?'• ,"'Vi4"4:11a1:,'...'1 tr'' 1.',I.T, 4.1 -',•!.1 :-'• ;• -'' I .;, .',,.,..,;'1,1-,-;•':•';;i'-.11-Y.',:lgt-,b/r-1,:yr.' 4/A111,E1.!..„.1)- :,::,1 I-,-, 1.; .-:',E 4_-1 !: .•:.I I _ , I', .. ! 1,, ' ••...,-:%.,-• -..,,-fp-r, "r,i • ,t''',....•';',11,- -ir i., ,,' . ' ' AP,i, •,11:1 . -••-"-,,:t.4 -.14• 1, •••••••-:•,,:',-.11,,..'i'li I' ; ,C;17 ‘.' : .. .I g. ‘...,„.10$*i,,&;k1.1'...4}IL •', ;;I:i:A"-;'... , ki , ,..1.-.1''...1/.0,,-i,ii;,;:eaLli,-.,...-'• ''• -, -; ..•,;.,, p ,....;'1',.:!'s 41,4,,,,,Itl,'.: .. ....1 , • , • . .1 . .1.,,, 7,,c;.-11ricT4*-q....A,'''0,' ;:.'•,,- ;.-, ''i'• -.•.:.: .-: •' ..,::,,-)Zeit3.=.t. '. ,",'.11-" i'! !1••.' i i ' :- ''' ir,"•`'.,<",),,s.".{:SS*•.;;;*".,F,X(0-,: :1•,-`..""%,:.SI:,: ss 1 s'''.:: s'- .S....1'17'iSal;;4'14:tr...'-,7,L. i. ', .- . -r„ •.; '. _.,liitil:..i.,.434;14,;)ii."':i,,.::•`.tli:y0t;Th-,.-;,.',,ii.,"i'.19..' ' -':.s....•1:2.l,'..;,.. :,:-",.•3.-.1,::A '...;::•;CcW,."4',' ,.!,,.: 4,i.Itli,'..yN.',+,-,-'4.,;.•.,,,,,g1,4;',i"•,.. Ev.:,..;;,:„1.4,:j1,•,..it':,',...1,‘,',.'4';,:f.'",:,;:,,;•i',51,.',',--;":".,,5,44,c1,,t:i,..i„,,;-;;,,:s !;.'I.,•,,,:1,4,,,,,.1-li' .j,,-t: '-' -: ,' , , ---.''''.-;:':'''':;;;)‘7.`ef;Cli*'4--;"'"•-'t'';'.44-''.1;i'14;-1-1.fr;4i•irlii7''''''1;t7;.i-Li-..°..i:(4;4-'::::.--' ..-!'''''',:‘:::1:L':::7;ilis•:',.,;":".''-,4•4,'::-IP1."7.?,.,,,..‘;''''''''.ji:.,.., -1'j,..ii._1-11-.'''. !II 1,'".:11,';1.',',.. : ' . ' - -,.-,.-01,,,'''otijX:4-•',..714 '1.0-.4,Airls.-.,-;•,t.4.4jr,.0..,(4.,,.,....;,..T,,r.. T...: .:T.- -... T.-,-..,:22•1's,,Itz,., • ,. . 4, I., :‘, 1,1,_,,, .,,1,., ..., • • '•••••N'• e' ' -• : " 't''',,:ii.41' vil:'4',,•A,T.,-,..4.',..•'.•-•,',' ....k,' •P • :...;',,•„ ....r,,,:,.7.24, .;2.,,.-,..:....•., ,,' •.• . . .„;. i.,4., ,,, • . ':''''''.1.i.„:.-: '•••• -I, '-' -.•i•e" .-"" . "1'..i''';•4.;'•T7._':',.,'''.• -,.'' ' :'' -- '. ''',''. •,.."'71-',.,::AO 44.T...-L' •• - -1-.'] '•'"'• " 1 ." . • . ': . .....,..,. .E. , ,',t,, ,.ttf,A,,s,.:',,".,'•"".'s s • s. .' ,, 'ss, . s"; :."11...t:."-,-,V 's .,', s-...1 s, 4'r. •; - !'0.•.' I ! . ' 1 ,,;:,....r!.1:ii.,,i1.44,301.#10F. ',. ,,- W,,',Y,141:1: ,„,; ,.-.: ':..' , ...„, .,,,•,, ' .:,,,,d., ..r....:,„..,;•..,.,.„.. ,..,.._1 •,•J•;.. L ;•..... _, .. , " r'....•••.#•,T.,•,•,,,t,..:T,.,..; ,,tp.14 .•i,:.••,.„:,,e;„.: ••.:.,, ,,, ,g,,.: ,0 ..000: • . , ,..",...-.-5.•,-:r,...:--1,1,L-....1-t,, ; ,.:' '-,s"?" • . 1 • ,''.' :.'.'.".;""r$es'A 3.1::&'. 1,*.1 . ....40.:,;........0.P., - . 4.ior' ..' .1 :...,-kt,i,;,fl•',-,:,-.., .! ,• ;. -,;- ,! '.- ' i . -.. • ' ', :-.., • ,t•,,,,,i01,. ;:ipg,,,.11; 4,,,n41.0 5,..a.,:,,,...„....,.??---- . " . .... ...- . . . -io-,-.Ew,::...,•..„.g7;:-. .,-- 1.,;.'r 1 .1-; , • • ‘. '•-';e;,i'Vf11.(tf.';N-'ke-'••,',A,Tillt.•,'"`•,7..' - .‘,',... . . .. .,.. ',.F„ '',-.,.,; ,,,,-.1-- -.„.....:!..:. -. . ,, ,..,... 40,• ,-, - ,...,,,,,,,,,,,p.,..;.,,i; ,-,.. .- , t. , ..,. ...,.4. •.... I? '• r,. .I . , ' • ' ' ' '....e '''''.' ...1'• ;''',7r,i)';..;;;!'.' ' :. i A 49- ' ;;-'C7 ''-'i:ireSe ill ir :_,..,, fre,;),,, •41.2,1/7 ..I' dor / , ,:':''',7.,..:,',0 ,,,,;;;;1,,- al r dr( , ,,, ..4_,,, ......T. so, . 04, 3r,441.4,"'s'S-1 .4 ',..1•ig,ii„i..k,..f.....irfL.?.,",,,,s,,,,r,,a4, •4"1e', 4-',,.).".7,-.•,;1;i;:_':..;;07•:'44.14r,;;':.",:'..,'.....;-;'•,.;!:t".,"',. ,-',,,..' .:'11.4,.:Y.-., , ... -- . • - .'. ._"?',.•4,,.,.',''' .'.e'.T:c:i,oPi.i,.,'1g:!i„-k t;-• .--' I ,. I, I ra/ r d. t - - : r -o e;:::;,?.:',..„ fill;,....irr,..LC,i: _'1-!'.-.1:•.i- l'.,- , e i: ,.e...-. .•,,,,,?:,4,;,.-,..,..,:.,,,,, q -,. ..- ...„0"4",,, -_,,,, . .c.'.•'-,i ‘f,'-',... :' ••,v.,,4-..!'-_/,Li••, 1-,,,"',„.v. l'•: - . • , frn, ir,,..., ,, • - ,i• .' • 1 '."",.1 I'" ..."..-.),-•/,Y71).or if . ,. - :.,1,1,„..., • • , „. ',,_- -.- ...„... -, --- •• sts-P''"Fr.. .;•-•1113T1,-,i.`:.:. w.',...,,.i,•,,„l'i , " .• • -, y- • • ,, 1 ,., • 1.7 • at•"%ri..:.:•,`•;...."I'.1:. ,t.i:1/4, .... -,--••• ..-... ,,, %..••••,-.1,?.11/4.5 l'.1-...,-," 1:: '.-1,..•••:, 1... .:-..,---:',.'-i•-J--,7•_,,l' .--• ••••'-:• ' - -,- 1-,...-...;-.•:.‘,.....,V,Av.:j - ,.F.,-:- 1-1•,' ..--, .„---',:. r..". ••• `.--,..--r•••-.' ; - 1.'40,4).. 4;ot 1 • • " '•• .'....•.', '::".';':•-,ti f.•, ,;:itt'd Le.,,,L'•'.1 'i'1,i '' ''''!"1 , d-:4'•... - '''' '- ' , '-•' • ,... .,,,,,,':i ','''' !Ik...-' !...Z;7' ,'''.,.:l'r.,'.',. -1 - '.1..' •• ' '•- • '1 - .. . ' ;•,.,,.,;...' .,..../..it,' , ' ' "''. .'")441k,b., ';,..c.:L.T';_•,_ „I.::, -;i ,. d--',-''.,1. 1 , -'.': ,-. r,:d • . • - . •.'• '''.- ' ''',. - ' r• ''4,-,t. , '{ ,F.. 4,A,..,-‘,.,: ,,-4,Litril ','-''.- t.::1 , , ..t.f- F'.. „--- - '• ' t; .•-•7"'"i"'" ''•';-i•.•,'.-"..f.• ,....7.- .;•.7,4‘,....t1 '.- ',.J 4ef-- '- ,--... ii . .... ..q, ..,,i.,,.. ' ` 'I.) ''. • . . sl'.-„ . . , .„. r, . . , 1 „. ,-. ,;.'.'..' . .""! I- izi/ei.-' dr.)70'• '''''' -ii:tee;•"-- .':'' •74:-.' . „, ,.. , . , . . ' ' •, , . ,. ,, . - ' . . . -I• ' I I - "'''''.4''• tr'cii'le,'.-''' '' ' ' j . , „• ..'...I 1-' ' .07‘ , • . . 1 . , ,1-4-,...•...t.t..T.'.1,,,e•r •-, ' •,.• 1 ,';', • ' • t`-'7.•if--.., ,-,,•-.I I , '-•'IN,,i.; - "..'' ''.• :,'' ,",_ .., ., 1 , 144', . - - , •- ' __. i., . ....,. - - - - - . . v?i?iii::'i(isi?iii::iiiiiii:tiii:i::ii:i::::i:S:::i:S:::ii::i: ......... .... � 'v' ^:ti?• ::i. :iii •:i:i: .. .... .... � ::. :' +•ii '<::: :::: :'.. :: ;: .::}�iii:iii:•i:??•i:•:ii�i:•r:::•::ii:•i::i::i'.:i:::::iii::isS:i:vii??�:iii!i:;::::.iii:.i: : ..a PERTSf...O!W E.NRS . ........C...�:;;:::::::::::::.�::::::.�:::::::::.:. :.: >�<�><��RL7JE�'�'>�IN�4A�111:`Tt�:•:•`<�� ><<<� <� >��>< .:�.:...:.:c.:;es:Moratii3n"grieIa�'etiwn�r :te��e:�tectaR�addeiartel> :nata�ized:')Vtester:iApplicat.on.for.?eac€t.o:wner PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: R.B. Boyd The Home .Depot Puget Western Inc. PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: 19515 North Creek Parkway, Suite 310 915 South Grady Way • CITY: Bothell, WA ZIP: 98011-8200 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 915460-0010-00 972500-0751-06 TELEPHONE NUMBER: '(425) 487-6566 EXISTING LAND USE(S): • Vacant Puget. Sound Energy Site ;: ::::i:i;i:v 'ij' :>::<_::»:><:»:giA.::.P....L.IGANT..{�f...othe.r::ahatUO ner':>niMi > PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: Jim Lyon Home Depot COMPANY (if applicable): I. Home Depot U.S.A. Inc. EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION:' Employment Area Commercial ADDRESS: 9450 S.W. Commerce Circle #325 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): N/A CITY: Wilsonville, OR ZIP: 97070 EXISTING ZONING:. Commercial Arterial CA TELEPHONE NUMBER: ' (503) 682-7592 PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): 11111111111111111091 N/A SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): NAME: Jay Grubb; P.E. Bruce Creager 16 Acres COMPANY(if applicable): Barghausen Consulting PROJECT VALUE: Engineers, Inc. 6 million ADDRESS: 18215 72nd Avenue South IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? - No CITY: Kent, WA ZIP: 98032 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? .- TELEPHONE NUMBER: - (425) 251-6222 - _ Stream / Wetlands #W-31 a r. : :::................................. I:lN€tF=11'RaPE1TY ° ►t� e.et;�f:::r� c �a.............................:............ • See Attached • • ......................... ..... .........Ghie�......�.....a . .�..�at.v�.... e.s..�t....��.a ...�.. ...spa..................def..............e.....ees{..:.:.�.:.:...:�:.:::.::::::.::.�:.:::::::::.. _ANNEXATION • $ SUBDIVISION: • _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ REZONE $ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT • $ SPECIAL PERMIT $ _ SHORT PLAT $ • TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ .Q') _ FINAL PLAT $ • GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ X VARIANCE ' $ .25Z c)-t3 (FROM SECTION:`t—'/—/3 ) _ PRELIMINARY _WAIVER $ , . FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT _ $ _ ROUTINE VEGETATION • MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT • $ _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: _ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE- VARIANCE $ _ EXEMPTION $No Charge XENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ " O. REVISION $ ..................................................................................... ... ................. :::;::><:/�1=FCDtiLI!iT> F:OVSI1ERSl- .P...................................... I, (Print Name) (,2.. . ,declare that I am (please check one) Vthe owner of the property involved in this application,_the authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. • �..e:t t motes rn ham. (p� ATTEST: Subscrib and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and pJ•t , ��o.� f� for the State of bl/ed R- residing at (Name of Owner/Representative) , on the aday of (Signature of Owner/Representative) /< ��-✓ (Signature of Notary Public) completed by C: ' er....:.... :.:.:. .:........ :.:.::::.:::.:: ... a D:::::BS:t?:::::C F>: >:.;;;:C p: .::::SPA.:::: U:A:.::::CU._H.:...: • .. :_ .. .. ...:::::::.:.. • ..N.....�P.....SM.....AMC.....�')�..........��.�... ..)�.• ............. :»>:.ii$ ::<:::::: : ::::<::<:<:::tritAugtEt:,::>::>t.....:; ,::; :>.>::<::>::>::>::>iiii::>::;::>:::;`torig :>Ate.S dcgi:QU13 [7:::<:> >::::: .>-:.:.::::;<:>:>:>::::::>:<:::>;::>::.:>:::<:<:«:;:<:>::>:<:>:>::<:>::>:»>;>::>::»: MASTERAP.DOC -REVISED 8/97 - _ - 1// , SCHEDULE A2 Order No. 398616-5K DESCRIPTION: 'ALL THOSE PORTIONS OF BLOCKS 1 AND 2, INCLUDING THE UNNUMBERED TRACTS ADJOINING THE LOTS IN BLOCK 1 OF WALSWORTH' S FIRST ADDITION TO RENTON, ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 6 OF PLATS AT PAGE (S) 23 , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING SOUTHERLY OF SOUTH GRADY WAY AND NORTHEASTERLY OF TALBOT ROAD SOUTH; TOGETHER WITH THOSE PORTIONS OF BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH AND - SOUTH 8TH AVENUE VACATED BY CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE NO. 2850; WHICH ATTACHED THERETO BY OPERATION OF LAW. TOGETHER WITH REVISED PARCEL "D" OF CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LUA-98-164-LLA AS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 9812109014, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THEREFROM THE WESTERLY 150 FEET OF THE ABOVE- DESCRIBED PARCELS ADJACENT TO SR-515 (TALBOT ROAD) ; ALSO EXCEPTANY PORTION THEREOF LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE 1 NORTHERLY MARGIN OF EASEMENT "A" AS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 9812171951, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. • �J . Page 3 f, ^ PROJECT NARRATIVE THE HOME DEPOT AT SOUTH GRADY WAY AND TALBOT ROAD SOUTH RENTON, WASHINGTON OC BCE JOB NO. 6254 - opa REVISED DECEMBER 6, 1999 Cep OF RF L4 Nei/ NTON NG °EC 0 . 199 PROJECT PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION: 9 �IV ► The proposal is to construct a Home Depot facility on a 16-acre parcel at the interse aFf of South Grady Way and Talbot Road South. The store would sell a variety of home improvement products and material , including lumber, hardware, plumbing, electrical, tools, and garden supplies. The Home Depot store is 117,064 square feet in area and 36 feet in height. The Home Deport facility would also include a 14,790-square foot outdoor garden center. The 612 parking stalls proposed would include parking for the customers and employees of the Home Depot facility. The proposed landscape plan will provide for approximately 78,800 square feet, or 11 percent of the total 16-acre parcel, in formal landscaping. Additionally, approximately 56,000 square feet would remain in native open space, adjacent to the Benson Road South right-of-way. Customers would enter the site by either of the two proposed driveways from South Grady Way, or by the way of the single driveway proposed to Talbot Road South. Delivery trucks would enter the site principally from the northeasterly driveway from South Grady Way, circulate around the building to the on-grade lumber load/off load area, or to the dock-high loading door situated on the southwest side of the Home Depot building. They would then exit the site through the driveway to Talbot Road South. ZONING: ► The zoning on the site is Commercial Arterial(CA),with an"Auto Mall District B" overlay zone. The zoning designations on the surrounding parcels are as follows: • To the north, directly abutting the Home Depot parcel, the City Hall property is zoned Commercial Office(CO). To the north, across South Grady Way, the properties are zoned Commercial Arterial (CA) and Commercial Office (CO). • To the south and east, across Benson Road South and I-405, the properties are zoned Residential 8 Dwelling Units per Acre. • To the west, across Talbot Road South, the property is zoned Commercial Office (CO). EXISTING;BUILDINGS: 0. The site;is currently vacant. The two existing Puget Sound Energy buildings will be demolished. SENSITIVE AREAS: ► The City of Renton Sensitive Areas Maps depict a "stream" on site and wetlands (Wetland No. W-31) of approximately 1 acre in size to the south. This wetland has been reviewed by Natural Resources Consulting (NCR). In the Wetland Delineation Report, dated September 1999, NRC found that there is a concrete line stormwater pond and concrete line drainage channel on site, which do not contain any vegetation soils or hydrologic conditions necessary for the area to be considered a wetland. -1- 6254.006[EAUsm/jss/ph] Some small areas of steep slopes are within the area of the proposed Home Depot building/access road and will be altered by site development. These areas occur along a lobe of fill extending into the northeast portion of the site. This lobe is 25 feet to 30 feet above the proposed site grade and was apparently formed entirely from coal tailings from early mining operations from the hill to the east. These slope areas are not officially mapped on City Sensitive Areas Maps. Further, these slopes have been analyzed pursuant to Renton Development Regulations Section 4.3.070C3ii and have been found to have an average slope of 34 percent. SOILS: ► The soil's report indicated that the site is generally underlain with coal tailings (6 to 10 feet thick) over alluvial soils (11 to 91 feet thick) over bedrock(sandstone)to terminus of the borings. Layers of peat deposits;and other fill materials were also encountered randomly throughout the site. On-site soils are moisture sensitive and could be difficult for use as structural fill if exposed to wet weather. The type of fill material will primarily depend on the grain size and moisture content at the time of placement. EARTHWORK: ► Approximately 45,700 cubic yards of material would be cut and 19,300 cubic yards of material would be stripped. Approximately 6,600 cubic yards of fill material would be required. Approximately 75 percent;of the excavated material may be suitable for use as fill, depending upon the time of year of construction. As a result, up to 58,400 cubic yards may be removed from the site, with the remainder being used for on-site fills. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: ► Minor improvements would include reconstruction of curb, gutter, and sidewalk for the existing driveways,which will be closed. Additionally, Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., would install a traffic signal at Williams Avenue and associated channelization in South Grady Way and at the intersection with William's Avenue. Other associated site improvements would include the extension of utility services, including water, sewer, telephone, power, gas, and cable television. VEGETATION: ► Trees and groundcover on portions of the South Grady Way and Talbot Road South frontages will be removed. Approximately 37 trees over 6 inches in caliper, together with groundcover,will be removed from the area, directly adjacent to Benson Road South. The remaining 56,000 square feet of embankment adjacent to Benson Road South will remain an open space with existing trees and groundclover to be intact. RIGHT-OF-WAY: ► No land would be dedicated as a part of this project, as there is adequate right-of-way on all street frontages. PROJECT COST: b. The estimated construction cost for the project is $6 million dollars. -2- 6254.006[EAI/sm/jss/ph] CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION DESCRIPTION HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. The following is a summary of the construction mitigation measures proposed for the Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., project in accordance with Item No. 10 of the Site Plan Approval Submittal Requirement Form: 1. Proposed Construction Dates: Construction of the project is scheduled to begin in Spring 2000 after all plans are approved and permits issued. Construction is anticipated to be completed in six to seven months (Fall 2000). 2. Hours of Operation: The hours of operation during construction of the project are anticipated to be from 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. or up to the maximum allowable hours of operation approved by the City of Renton. 3. Proposed Hauling/Transportation Routes: Although the haul route for trucking imported fill material and removal of debris and unsuitable material has not yet been determined, it is anticipated that the haul route will be along South Grady Way and/or Talbot Road South, or as approved by the City of Renton. 4. Measures to be Implemented to Minimize Dust,Traffic,and Transportation Impacts,Mud,Noise, and Other Noxious Characteristics: Mitigation measures during the construction phase will include an erosi▪on and sedimentation control plan that will include temporary construction entrances, silt fence, ditchingI, and a sedimentation control pond that will control any site runoff so as not to impact adjacent propertie▪ s or nearby water bodies. Water trucks will be provided if required during the construction phase for dust control and flaggers will be available as needed at the site entrances during the trucking operati ns for traffic control. Construction equipment will meet or exceed Washington State emission standards for noise and pollution. In addition, street cleaning and sweeping will be provided on an as needed basis, as determined necessary by the on-site Superintendent and/or City Inspector. 5. Specialty Hours: It is not anticipated that weekend and/or late night working hours will be required for construction of this project. 6. Preliminary Traffic Control Plan: A traffic control plan prepared in accordance with Washington State Department of Transportation and City of Renton guidelines will be submitted prior to construction. sti l'1,1'14/ 6254.007[FAK/jss] vt- JUSTIFICATION FOR THE VARIANCE FROM THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE 4-4-130 "TREE CUTTING AND LAND CLEARING REGULATIONS" DEVELOPMENT PLAN11Nd FOR THE CM(OF RENTON HOME DEPOT PROJECT NOV 0 5 1999 AT SOUTH GRADY WAY AND TALBOT ROAD SOUTH RENTON, WASHINGTON RECEIVED Our Job No. 6254 The purpose of this document is to demonstrate the satisfaction of the City of Renton variance criteria as described in the City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-9-250B.5 "Decision Criteria, " to allow a variance from the City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-4-130 "Tree Cutting,and Land Clearing Regulations"to allow land clearing and grading on a portion of the site that has slopes in excess of 40 percent. Project Proposal: The proposal is to construct a Home Depot Home Improvement Center on a 16-acre parcel located& at South Grady Way and Talbot Road South. The subject property is zoned Commercial Arterial, CA, with an Auto Mall District B overlay designation. The Home Depot facility includes a 117,064-square foot gross floor area home improvement center building, a 14,790-square foot garden center, 612 parking stalls, and associated lighting, paving, landscaping, and off-site street improvements. The Home Depot building measures 470 feet by 254 feet, and the garden center measures 82 feet by 179 feet. A seasonal sales area is proposed adjacent to the garden center structure. To function properly, a front parking field is necessary to provide a minimum of 400 to 450 parking stalls for customers, with perimeter drive aisles that serve both customers, delivery truck circulation requirements, and emergency vehicle access.' Site Grading Objectives: The project will involve the grading of approximately 45,700 cubic yards and stripping 19,300 cubic yards of soil from the site in order to create acceptable site grades that will work for The Home Depot building and parking areas. The operational and regulatory requirements for this use are unique and result in multiple objectives of the grading design plan. All corners of the single-story building are designed to be at the same elevation, with finished floor grades at the emergency exit points also matching the grade of the adjoining drive aisles and the parking area. This helps to accomplish the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Uniform Building Code requirements for emergency exits and emergency vehicle access. This also provides a level building floor area to accommodate the merchandising of bulk and oversized merchandise, and to accommodate the customer's use of large flatbed carts that are used to take heavy construction materials to the cashier. Grades of the parking areas are designed for a minimum of 1 percent and maximum of 3 percent grades to satisfy ADA standards and to provide positive stormwater drainage collection and conveyance, 6254.010.doc[BKC/jss] I - , Existing Site Conditions: Existing site conditions are unique. Although the site is large, the site shape is somewhat irregular, with a serpentine east property line due to Benson Road right-of-way along the east margin of the site. The site is generally level, with a gradient of the site gently sloping downward from south to north. However, along the eastern boundaries of the site, Benson Road lies approximately 25 to 30 feet above the site. The slopes of the embankment along the frontage of Benson Road generally range from 20 percent to 40 percent. There is a large vegetated lobe of fill material that extends northwest from the Benson Road embankment and projects an additional 150 feet into the site. This lobe is also approximately 25 to 30 feet above the proposed site grades and is covered with blackberries, brush, and deciduous trees. According to the Geotechnical Engineering Services Report by GeoEngineers, Inc., dated October 15, 1999, the lobe is largely manmade, consisting primarily of black coal tailings from early mining operations from the hill to the east. The site also contains an open concrete storm culvert, which runs along south half of the Benson Road embankment, and adjacent to the east paving limits of the existing Puget Sound Energy development. This further constrains the site development, as the City of Renton prohibits clearing of vegetation within 25 feet of water courses (reference Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner for the Autonation facility, File No. LUA-098-151). This further limits the feasibility of development on the east side of the site. I'll fact, the area that is limited by development as a result of these factors is 98,000 square feet, or more than 2 acres of the total 16-acre site. The most significant impact is the shape of the lobe that protrudes 150 feet into the northeast corner of The Home Depot parcel. Detail Description of the Request for the Zoning Code Variance: The City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-4-130 "Tree Cutting and Land Clearing Regulations," Subsection C.4, states: "Restrictions for Sensitive Areas: No tree cutting or land clearing is permitted within twenty-five feet (25') of any shoreline area, within twenty-five feet (25') of the ordinary highwater mark of creeks, in a wetland area, or on parcels where the predominant slope or individual slope is in excess of forty percent (40%) except enhancement activities." The subject proposal contains approximately 20,000 square feet of area that is over 40 percent slopes, the majority of which are along the Benson Road frontage. To develop The Home Depot project, it is necessary to remove vegetation and grade approximately 5,900 square feet of the areas with 40 percent slopes. The areas that will be graded are in the lobe that protrudes from the east margin of the site. There are four separate areas: one is 1,020 square feet and has a rise of approximately 14 feet; the second is 900 square feet and also has a rise of approximately 14 feet; the third area is approximately 520 square feet and has a rise of four feet; and the fourth area is 3,460 square feet and has a rise of approximately 20 feet. See the Variance Exhibit for details. Variance Decision Criteria (RMC 4-9-250B.5) and Justification: Criteria A: "That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location,; or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the zoning code is found i to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification." 6254.010.doc[BKC/jss] Justification: The combination of factors of the irregular shaped parcel, the existing drainage channel', the embankment along the east property line (Benson Road frontage), and especially the protruding lobe of black coal tailings, are special circumstances that are unique to the subject property and are not present in other sites in the vicinity with the same Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning. Again, it should be noted that this lobe that contains the 40 percent slopes to be altered is not a natural feature, it is manmade, and results from the deposit of black coal tailings from early mining operations from the hill to the east. All other parcels in the vicinity' with this zoning have been field examined and none appear to contain this set of hardship conditions. The total area restricted from development amounts to nearly 2 acres, thus, these limitations create hardship on the property owner and developer to develop the site to its maximum economic potential, and certainly have the effect of not allowing development of the site with The Home Depot, as depicted on the site plan. Criteria B: "That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare;or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated." Justification: The alteration to the 40 percent slope areas will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and in the subject zoning district. The grading will be done under the direction of and purview of Home Depot U.S.A.; Inc.'s geotechnical consultant. A Geotechnical Engineering Report has been prepared and submitted to the City of Renton. This report outlines specific construction techniques and methodologies to follow for the construction activity. Preliminary Grading Plans have been prepared and submitted for review during Site Plan Approval. Final Plans will be prepared for final approval by the City of Renton, with all appropriate geotechnical conditions incorporated. The approval of the variance will allow Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., to construct its facility on this vacant parcel thus providing another economically viable business to bring its employment opportunities and tax revenues into the City of Renton. Criteria C: "That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated." Justification: Other properties in the vicinity and zone do not have the special set of circumstances and conditions that are present on the subject site; in particular the manmade lobe of earth that protrudes 150 feet into the northeast corner of the development site. Thus, other properties in the vicinity and zoning have not been required to develop with the City's development regulations having this magnitude of an impact on the site. Criteria D: "That the approval as determined by the Hearing Examiner or Board of Adjustment is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose." Justification: The requirement to develop The Home Depot entirely outside the restricted areas would require a shift of the Home Depot development 200 feet toward Talbot Road South and one hundred forty feet toward South Grady Way. To illustrate the impact with this shift, the Garden Center would be located approximately in the proposed driveway to Talbot Road South. ; This will result in a reduction of the parking field by one-half (approximately 200 stalls), to an unacceptably low number. 6254.010.doc[BKC/jss] 's1. \\ r0e.s44144. Ps/50540454/ENG1ED5/40/5254-M/M0 OM F4/5055/6254/10404E15391C/0SEF 5.04 Om L. I 0/10/59 0o,504420 50 PAPER$Yry::. NO ,7.4. .10q,O. 1254. 00: B511 — " HOME DEPOT STORE I. 1 50 ''''''''' ''''''''" ar•—% CITY RENTON OF'. --1 - • _ --i: , „„.., Bsw . RENTON WASHINGTON i .4 1 :•• ---- .- i BST/ ;'' •- . - • Plonn VARIANCE EXHIBIT 1in9/Building/Public Works Dept. .,,.....„,,.. NO, REVISION BY DATE APPR Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator •C; ‘ I I , i 17 I li I I 1 l 'di'. I....;\ '\\ Ei • • r`Jzi:D7:) z o' ! I !1 I 1 I , Opzn_o , : i I i ,4 •••, ,,,,•- •,.::•X b I\ ', . , i .1. i \ \ 7 /-- --....-••::', ,.,\-.. 0 apr- °-9 '.-.1- • :•21 ii , • 1 ,;,• \ , cr, -a 53 i: 1 i 1 1:q I , ' ,./21.-.-, ..\•-- • - - .), ..,--. ..;--, s‘, m Fri m • : i 1 ;q t‘\ -,x) g." \ . ',7- / 2 M •-• sN I:\1 I ! I I; :11 ...-2,4_, ,•'),.,,, ,,',,/-24'....,,i,,,".\ • ..\, , 1-> ''\...,. X';,;,,,,.., '': -/' -. .. 0.. ,,,V:',',1,.• K s• ., ; ,, ' ' .i :II ''..k----i--- ..„-- ,,‘,„ ..\\\ ,\ . m ,... .• \ ',E,.-- ..._ Vss,N,:,,',- ,,,. 71 3S0 ' •„ . ,,, cl • ,, i 1-4,... \ \ \ ,...,._...„..., . „ . • zx (s. • , . • \\A--.:, . p '. \ \ ,. i !,1 (i .i, • - _.../.,\ , ,I • . ,, !.-/ . • : s '• \'• '`•Ir't-';/ ,." ' • 1 I '. •,•.• .•.1., . mE7i i -, • r.;',/, I/i It ir i / .( ".\' ......-, \:,.... \ 'i , , \ \\,..,•\\ IA \ .• -I i§ ,;•./•; : 'I ;i I .6 ., •,,s,\. ,,... ..,,If , ‘0...5,,...-".... \\\ \ ' ' , .N:.. ,‘\:U../,i '3‘,., • T F, \4 .'„ \ ‘1141.--' rn2C1 gl- \ "'', '1' \, .,S'..2.,4 —V - • ' \\\ , co ..... ,...- :, g i" . 1 Y i I,c' ,., -•F. - ''' •-. ••• \\ \ \ 1 ,_,,,, ,V.•\.,•',•;,‘,\.•1, :.,,, i\ •-f/:\ .-1-0 I \ ',, -"VA'. \r•••••" :, i: I•.1!,, ,) 3: 1 C N ‘'.•\ . ' I :`.k ' I ,./ •4;\1 \\‘i'1/A ••\ ' \ ':' 2 , w, / i ;I ; ,, ., ,••--.. ,, , m I, 14.,.,..'., ;.,,,,7,::';\\/..i_..r....\c‘i..\..: .,....,\,,, \s . r /,' ,:p" : • . .,,,,,z,/,', ., ;., v,fic ..". ........_. ., x 41. i ',,,\., / ., . ,\; r , , , \ , Nal 1 (al I k 1 , • • • ...1,' ‘ \ .:,., N.'"-----p I ' • !'.7,,,, ....75•4.5.3 ;,.:,...,../ ...0.... ----- \.,\;" ' .1. • ' ' \" ..:. \.S.,...\\. '1,,,. i • ,;.•l',,1 1 -- .,' 1' -fi;/ ........... ..-. ....... A •1 .‘:\ • \ \ ' I gA . so. : \ V,•;,.\:\ i i 1 fr.• \ '‘, '' z '; ''I • I .......... kV. 2.54' ' r‘.‘ , 1 ll . i •rr, • 1 '%\\ i 1-___,........ 1'N, ••\\ i • . •• I P,' \k,1 4rkroi . r• t.1 ...... .• zas 0••-•> j / 00 i i ----,.................._-,---- ----,•,-_,.,........"•• -C--.. --.4.' " -1 M 0 73) l'/ 1 I • / i t /4 4 s \‘..\ „ s t ' . • si' • I //I'''. .... 4 '• t\1 t . \ -—.4- ..-E- , i , . . ..f. ;... 1- i , .„ ..._...._--.F,,„ . ,, -- • e i 1 i 7,.. ..V.... Li " , , _,,.,-ri .:...t..... ,,,j' a ,,, ' illiiiiii , , . 0 -''' t.,(1' ;'.N• \s<\:\ ....r,•0.:-: , il\\\ '• ' \1 ..... ( G •••• • / I I : El P / e• A I ! .; ',,..-,.%•,-•,14,'7•. \\ ‘.1 \tViW'4;• i i lit'it' - \ r . r t Z xi 0 __• ilsr'fTtr-2_A'',,%/ 1 I, 1,'<''''.",`,:,2'fa to ''.:1\ 1 '.\\ Il\•‘1.1ll''\l',\I' ., . --------. -r,c°rTI t ,';;:ek,. `,/, i , -_,,:. •I ; ,.”4, ' . .- 1! 14 ..13..-"" g! III i i • • 11 . •. \0 0:30 i ,;,L, .......- ; ; . e•• .-/, t, ‘' *.k•N`k • I / ir, a ri-- .... ------- kA' \ ,N,..- , ,., N i r___. ‘ .: 1.•.It 0 i \ \I •rr,. ,T., ,,,,,,,,,,orlii, r'..--7 r ,r---..-1;. . . . ''N •.\\\\\". k I 1 :•,,.,. Zit:- -I 1 h--7-4-...1....4 '..-h-i...I i-'-4. W I ....,-,..eller.,, ,,._,:7n-,_,...;±..7.44r.,-, .2:::',!--.".' I \ .1t..11, ..:" 1 I 1 I \ i .'\I 1, ,..'"..,,5-37 :=',..: ..<':.7-7-- I \ I i -L „vi 1..,52..A.: 6 ' ! 1 I I 1/! ! 1 !II ! I I'1 ,, tiAk ,• ' ' ' iffli i,I0 ' / .11C,,,,N.\.\\ '''''.--:•;:t..,.' I A.6 j t \ ;.1.••••' "q fr / i / I i IC :2:7.. / ,Iilliciii , , . N. _. \ ,/ . ,..',\'..•..N ., !,,--:-:--_-__::::- f::: ••• 7 t ;,•.• :a3Z1,63,I N 'il. , if i re----- L , .••••:.•:•••;\ ti / / / I\ ---.: --/---.T..../..,_, I.-„' / IIIIIIii , , :i -?--- -I , i..i.-1-:-..-i-,...i....i , , • , 1 \‘,s: '\\:;;•'..t I..1-'7~. :t":1',UV IP,''. ----;• i . ' ' .° ! / I ! i ! ' / /7-1-t-I.-; bil ;:::-2.'D rri \\ : ;;::‘;4.41-:•';',1.:;'::::: -,t;c't.';,: ...1:.:;:237: -. • I 0 -'-'-. "': ;::;,t4.-;•.?.'..-'' '-.:::-;.--:: . :, '. lb, • ; ' • i , , , , . • • fa 0.) .s--Z:s-:-.-• e.-.:---;.':;:::. .\\;;k- G.,,, -4'CY)ri... / ! • , : 4 \4 k tt. Cf) 0 ." 1:: ::‘: 1 t II .. '.• 1 ./..,./ fifIliliiiIi 4 l'I't' -r7 0 (:) \?' ' ' '.::•., 1 III\!1••••:* ' I I '-ri-1-4-b..1 i rri 5-'BE -- ii•r, 1 • '! i I i i i 1 i I i---r--t--1--4....;..k1 .b F>co 11 1 ,(1;1)111111111 . , \ "11.1 }-• -Oil I!•II i / /,,7 ! :,..' • ......„... ,-ig - • , ; 1 !,J.- \ '2 • 0 zr-r" . 11 it,111111114 I o , -.1 0 K 0 I,' / i .; I / i ---.CY jj, --ri z ., / I I* 1 .'..1 -1 I i i ! ! , • . •,.', •,,,;,i m \ Ai 7,?;'/Iiiiii'r ., DJ 1 / / ? / :141 / '77''i\Ict.f.,,$;,,,L,..,1 'OW' ,,c.,:7 '`., , i . , r--0 li,••,:.,, ,/,,,,ii .; \( , \ I ri.. k./1//1:Vilfin/I c.;\It > ii/'l'ii'l il,'', fil iii'i'''iti,';I:7%:' . ; illi...1.11...T.'117,. ...11'..''.2... 714''i:El: ::ii:s111.1.i'.i':;"-81 :;:i.1.4:1'll''2\: ---u-Lc --.. /... I i 17 i / : iii . , I 1 1 , , , ,, , . ,-.,,,.,.. ....A.,e•,4,-. if ::,.3.n . ,/ . ' 1 1\1Mo/ill . I jg, • i r • 1 w lst ,.:, u\,....,,,. ID rrl E M ..s. ''' , / i II'/r\I'1 j I'.•'1' / , ..\.r z>< rn(7) .c. 0 f.• / / iil / ;,...,/ , --;,,,=•-,c, \ /,(:' / i ; i,,,,,,-./..../.._/.,i i i 1 b'• v.\ ' • rLi),,Lr• u'> m \ > z c \ /, th,C, 77',,t; :',,I 1; )1, .• ,\ , ,, , , 4; i 1/ / .,,.. l' • , , ,,•1, , • • \ .., ,,, . , , 791::: 16,:33' -... '''''.."' 67.. '-' j\ k A , Z .. t ., • \ •s 4 1 I I N' •;Wi;.•ly;\• ; \ / jA(\.\\'44. ; i _,ilk M ,, .41 .;;i I / / I i i , , , cn ,---•"2 , N ‘../.. \ * ., • ,) ' .„\'3,-• ):\•,‘ 1• ; >< • n "OK'. \\ i \\ " ;\ / ' ; • 1 il '•"). ;I/ ,I1 \-- - -!;-- 11....! I / I 1 4.1-it 14.i „ q ; I , ,/ I,' ii '4 ! I I ! I /-7-7-h'4-'4:1"-gI....! If! ! I I 0 '!' r', • itkr \ 1 ' \,\‘'' V I ii II/ \ \ i I 1."". -r'.: 1 !-- • / ; , 7 , • • • .„, . ; ; ; ,•4 4 . s—....L. ,0 'Pt' / 1 / 1 //' a ' " i ri - k . . •-- ' .' • r • ,. .. .0 , .1.; / ; ; / I ,. I / /•• / i 'e ! II / i ;1., -I I i I i i ;',f , , -z----- \, . k‘‘• ' - LIAIRDEN - - • • . .catis., 1 „. -..........L. ,..,_,..-- • oil ...--,x; 1 ki II:d li i. A.A..) . ; )I / / I 1,..,i , 1 ...4....i. ! I i 1 ,•:' / 1 44.0/ .;'4 i ...104.s. i Thr:-.1...1...J....1 V 1 I I 1 . . '21 I ! i 71-fti*..-1...i. 1 1 1 I i i \ th ti .4; li.; 0 ' . i ! I I 1 i i 1,/ I ritl--/-1- ..............„...........„.................. - ,. ' i -2,..!.......i.........._. t . - e-,' krim3;ir11.1,01;::.\.Cn \\\ • ' / i ,'; .; \ • , i,•, , , • , ; \ ; I • , • .• .,.; - ..,:'t - ,.. I ,.-- •. .1 1 z(DI ; \1k h. • liti\ ..- , a't : , , i ; ' ; t,,:‘, , • .............._ . • ' • ; / 1 ,,,, , , , , , . _:,..7...„ . . L., ( ,, >0, ,;;, ,,.,,_., ....„..?i,„ ,„,„--rryd.., , I ,. ,„, , , 1..,....„,.,,,..5,.._,...r..._...„ -00. ,.v. , .'.,.\,. ., , ,fr., ,, .„, ,_._ , . / / ,4..:1 y (-- t'i°P r>! i ! ; , I: ii 'v , ,• ''IN- ss. r, .‘..., 1 fill ‘ s,.,\, ,_ \k .1/4 \ ‘\ . .1 •I / / / liC: ‘1/ .1„ •''.1•PeYi \\\\,, & I i I ! i i I/Tr".....................................I'1.... , ..4...1.\...1 I I I i 1 ! i I i 1--''''''.-1-. '.>,'!"--....('‘‘‘ 1:1;.'.5.k.:5‘..,''''''.' ,-at-9,,ca..........., ' \ k.'N,',.,\\ ,v,--\.• \\\\to \I> '.\, --0,.,=,^ /: , / ,. ; h 7.•. .....:. 4....3.36., ' ' : i ' I I l' i l ni "T.i- ----.• . , •, , ,--.,-' " •---- - ,,---1-1)----- '',. ' v'..,,,,- .\'.\'. \ . \ ‘,'•' "I• ! 1 i ` •.:-"'! ! ' ' \ .7'Is.. ' -.' ,, / el i., J., or, , . v ' ....,. _.; . , • . \ ...,„ '••• 4 • • 1 • I i / i I j1-• .7- • . .2 '''''' ''. ' “-4(/ /-75 .'!"!--• 1 . ;.--, . -" , ; .>,•111‘.. f 1-1 I I .. ,- . , t.•., 1', I, 1 1,;,,T'i.., 1t.;1'. 7 • ..,. _.„<. . ......... gl:q ..1.1 / / 1 1 1 I 1 i i: ,.; 1)1-I i;f-,-7,, . •• -.)------- /:.• 11 , L----- •:,'; I"T",--1-1....i....i...;...L.:(. '-.'-!'"I t_;...e.7,:: I :-tz.„,-- ,-. c--\\ • \\--. 0\'\'' . '''''`i IiiiiPM\ •.....- lli ' / 1"•,, , T.,1---1-..'..1 !.--,Vil , .s.ii::,,..... , ---___s43:26.52., .„-- ....f.„-.:5\---.../ .,-, i),..„,U 1 I, ,\ , N. ',--•--1,--;\ z) )D • ''..::'\r,""ts\.\\\\\\''V\\\\'. \ , ., N ,______ 7.3.5.657-----....... ..,-- ,•,,,--...2,-:,.._.._.•• \ :iv \\ . .:., , Z ' t\\\\,011\\, \`\\.,'.' i / / / • rs,. .',N.'N'NN 1 1 i,..n ..----" ..---- \,/ __.< . • ,...•-• ,<c.\\ ,4 -., --• •,... - /Jiiiiiiiii» 'i\,, \\\\i, / i , ‘... N. -•.\ : i !),..fr•-ri•-• .-- • --< \ ' ' . yfJ)„. \\,\V\\\,\v, -,..,,,,,.., , ,,,,,,......0„ ,••• .... „,i i / i ! f i.)., ,• --- 4,.. --/,/---- ------,.... -Th--,„.'":. mi:-...._---1._ ..% / ,, .N-•:;,kN •,/ ---,::. ..-----•., . • . , , I,! i ,,/ ..,-/- . ,,,, .,,,,,,,,,,,4•5?f,t,--T,,,,1 il\‘ ----- „•-_-„,,,-..,-„•-• P71"1177,,,11111, ,,, , , up,,i.!,-ty..,„ ----, ..„...,,:-._ , -...._ ----,... --,-...-,_:;... , ii,...A, , •.-- - \ , ,2,-- „...,-„,,,•,, ,--. -----. ---,, ---, ,,Q>(‘ -,— \ • „,-- tt.i.v 1,,,e4-;--•-,_ 74-4 --... --__ - ;,,,,,.. ----,... , ,. ..\ . ,„; ,,,-,,, ., ,,.. r 2/ ,,./ • , , • - z ,--- ----....--,_. -,,, -- <.,,,,- ..,,,,,,s--•., ,,• „- - ...— ,„ rrl Plitilt* i(fr I • 1,,..iy)1 „ -`• `'.• '''''-- ''''''!:: '..-'• \..- '" / .; , C4 m X //' •I'lc'j> 1110.1101Y''''-';:....„. •••, ',,,, ......,..''''' "<•-.. ..• •••'• Z7/ ; / ----- - / Z•,1,_. V t.,1,,..0 , ,\\\,, H-Z r-1 /.• • \;\!.\\\\\\ 0.\\ •-I l 1 •7' .,•----b- -,,,,,,,: ----.•,,,,, --•,, •-••-- •'-• `,.., ,' ,<.( , \\ •\•\....'\).;\\\\`.\i',\\‘\ ci)m (1) - - a : \:' \ ...\ .' ,',\\\0\WO / , -''';'>\s..-:------..--'4:7r."- , '.- --- ' ' •-••'7,, N.„.::. -----.. ---,...---_-:- •_, : ------. .,t. "'"--1'7>< , . -. '' '• % \:'''• \ \ --"-Y , z 4 AT)(V\\\\'`` \W \ it;. • •,,\ \-‘ , \ t ,,, . J,..\.It . \,Dz ,-0 ..,,......; „,---.„ -- ',-,, ., ,,,,.. N.N\ \\„' . 0 4-0 ii • --:Ir'''11.1\gil\\\\)•I4II,:t Ii>14I-jt.. ',.,''' ' T i:.% 1.>:),I I Nt's-4•' '...N-t sK"N\ 3P..1g4 2> 73 ,...../ ,",11/,--"/ I \z is ii,.i ; \, \ , . .. .- / • „N., \,,, \ `‘sy:,„:7.\7,.,.‘..I'l \---17-- ,,,'.\•NN„: N.\.:,..1..\\. ..,\\'‘1\\\,, .17\\.:‘,\\\\‘`‘,‘„ - .• I.4 . ,. ./ • ..' ///'' \ /2.e..ji, :-: .2,1 I.,,, \,, it 8 6\.,54\f11112 MATCHLINE , 1 . .''',.,, \ \, \ \ ' '`, \ '• -'•."rr l -•-'•7,r''''': /. \ \_____.......) . ;.„.____/ ,,,,. , <7,1" / -•• ,, ' „i,,0, :,:g2,,:!,\:: - -- , i.- • '.. ;‘ I gk ‘,Tc,,., ,i1T1 1/ • . . ,....•,): .,"..,\\'..1) ,.,!.1/!pl.), .. " " • • • . . : k , ' i VQI' , 5) 1. Irl'l .. \ . \\.‘\„, ,,•••••••:K .,,,....,.. . \ . • ‘,. , \\.- , 1:. .i.... -; , •:-. \ ,ps—, ., \\..\• \, / „<„•,-," • .• , •-•. •---) \ '‘.•-• ..t • • .. . I Pit,g11/4/0/.1! P. - • • . . . ' i I I e______ . \ - -1) ,.., ,,t,d .t,I,\.••13,,,s\c....1\\--- \ -: ' • '. : : ‘' ' •\\\V-\s \-.....% .1 ' ' " ' • . , , \ ' =-'''' -I'''',.. •••• \\\ s •ks.• s '' ' / !' •/-, //,'‘`‘'• 1 I I 1 /,'Igliti/I/I/I.I \i ,',›> 'iS <.;,s• ST4te%I, , ,_. • /,,, ,,,, 1 F,,' ,-:.4 ,ts.:\S-_,;(.,\CJ\'',•:P ', IN .. \ \ \\N.. .,. tos, ; , 1 -1 0 [7, :Z"-;„,10 )?:-.,.,„ ..,,,,,,,,, •.; ,\\,..: --7- • \ • ., ,\,/ —• i'--/ 11114( 1 1 i I I; I I I \;.., \\,,\,,,4yS., N...\\ _...ig•.•---,--.:- , i .1' " ' 7\\\\\'"' 0 “''‘ c's.'"•/ ) 0/ lifILY,1111 ', Z-llo •='17-."-F, ,. • ill . , -1 o -/, „0,,*':e \!,,,,;cc .\s,\ \,,..6?":,•, -...1 !•- • • . . !-! ik. 0 71 2 (CR ///\ \.\•:\\ \ •'\, ._ . \: • • MATCHLINE - - •1 ' 11 Do 0‘;' '0 M /// \ \-.-\\,\\\ \s0. N.s N' .. S " • • TITLE: c Z FOR: 00 -I coVIA(/ ' 0 it• ; e 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH HOME DEPOT USA, INC. 1 t 0 Z Tr 0 KENT, WA 98032 10,._,. , (425)251-6222 \ VARIANCE EXHIBIT 1 0 33 3800 WEST CHAPMAN AVENUE ORANGE, CA 95868 ; I A 0 .ik v_ .,''• (425)251-8782 FAX I 1 2 ' . N Ills CMI.ENGINEERING,LAND PLANNING, • 9, ' 4'(., rt. .).140 EN 00 SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES I FOR RENTON,S.WHGRADYM EWDA ES FHW°1 WASHINGTON TON INC. B.C.E.JOB NO. • 6254 • PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer the questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF THE CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals,even though questions may be answered "does not apply. IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. D �OPMENT P�,NNING CIT(OF RE{�ITOt4 ®EC 0 7 1999 REGENE® 6254.004[BKuph/mm/sm] Environmental Checklist A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Home Depot Development 2. Name of Applicant: Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. c/o;Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 18215 - 72nd Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 (425) 251-6222 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. c/o;Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 18215 - 72nd Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 (425) 251-6222 Attn: Jay S. Grubb, P.E., Vice President Bruce K. Creager, Director of Planning Services 4. Date checklist prepared: October 15, 1999, revised December 3, 1999 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton Development Services 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Grading, site construction, and building construction is anticipated to start as soon as permits have been approved (spring 2000). Completion of on-site improvements, fixture installation and merchandising would occur approximately 6 to 7 months after construction begins. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. The,remaining ±5 acres west and southwesterly of the Home Depot parcel will likely be developed for future retail or commercial development consistent with the subject commercial arterial, CA zoning. 2 6254.004[BKC/ph/mm/sm] Environmental Checklist 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. • Traffic Impact Analysis for the Home Depot by The Transpo Group, Inc., dated November 1999. • Geotechnical Engineering Report for the proposed Home Depot facility, by GeoEngineers, Inc., dated October 15, 1999. • Drainage Report/Technical Information Report (TIR) for the proposed Home Depot facility, by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated October 22, 1999. • Wetland Delineation Report for the Renton Home Depot, by NRC, Natural Resource Consulting, dated September 1999. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. A boundary line adjustment is being processed by Puget Western, Inc. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal,if known. • SEPA Environmental Review • Building Permit (Structural) • Mechanical Permits • Plumbing Permits • Electrical Permits • Site Plan Review • Utility Construction Permit • Lot Line Adjustment • Washington State Department of Transportation Channelization Plan Approval • Board of Public Works waiver for Benson Road frontage improvements • Utility Permits (telephone, gas, power, cable) • National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Systems (NPDES) Notification 3 6254.004[BKC/ph/mm/sm] Environmental Checklist • Demolition Permit (City and Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Authority) • Sprinkler system and alarm system permits • Sign Permits • Right-of-Way Use Permits 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. The proposal is to construct a Home Depot facility on a 16-acre parcel at the intersection of South Grady Way and Talbot Road South, in the Arterial Commercial, CA, zoning district. The store would sell a variety of home improvement products and materials, including lumber, hardware, plumbing, electrical, tools and garden supplies. The Home Depot store is 117,064 square feet in area and 36 feet in height. The Home Depot facility would also include a 14,790-square foot outdoor garden center. A Boundary Line Adjustment would create a 10.88-acre lot for the Home Depot facility and a 5.10-acre lot for future development. However, the proposal includes some paving, parking, landscaping, and driveways on the 5.10-acre lot. They proposal also includes grading activities, with approximately 45,700 cubic yards of excavation, 19,300 cubic yards of stripping, and 6,600 cubic yards of fill using on-site material with excess being halved off site. It would also include demolition and removal of existing buildings, paving for the 612 parking stalls associated with the Home Depot, and installation of landscaping along the site perimeter and within the interior of the parking lot. Landscaping would be provided in accordance with the City of Renton requirements. The 10-foot-wide site perimeter landscaping provided along South Grady Way and a portion of the Talbot Road South street frontages totals approximately 10,000 square feet. In addition, the proposed plans show a total of 68,800 square feet of formal "interior" landscaping. This includes all interior landscape islands and landscaping along the perimeter beyond the minimum 10-foot width. This amounts to 19 percent of the total paved parking and maneuvering areas. Planting materials would include a variety of shrubs, trees, and groundcover suitable for the local climate. The frontage along Benson Road would remain largely in current native landscaping with existing mature trees, and existing shrubs and groundcover. This area equals 56,000 square feet. A retaining wall up to 28 feet in height will be constructed along the Benson Road frontage to allow the Home Depot building and maneuvering areas to fit on this parcel. Other associated site improvements would include the extension of utility services, including water, sewer, phone, power, gas, and cable. Street improvements would also be constructed at the intersection with Williams Avenue, reconstruction of damaged 4 6254.004[BKUph/mm/sm] Environmental Checklist sidewalk, curb and gutter, and reconstruction of improvements where driveways are proposed. Customers would enter the site by either of the two proposed driveways from South Grady Way, or by way of the single driveway proposed to Talbot Road South. Delivery trucks would enter the site principally from the northeasterly driveway from South Grady Way, circulate around the building to the on-grade lumber load/off-load area, or other merchandise to the dock-high loading door situated on the southwest side of the Home Depot building. They would then exit the site through the driveway to Talbot Road South. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project site is located near the southeast corner of the intersection of Talbot Road South and South Grady Way, in the City of Renton. Portions of the site are in the Southwest quarter of Section 17, Northwest quarter of Section 20, and the Northeast quarter of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington. The site address has been identified as 915 South Grady Way. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other The site is generally flat within the majority of the developed area. A lobe extending east from the embankment adjacent to Benson Road, will be regraded for the Home Depot building and perimeter circulation for delivery vehicles and service vehicles. The proposed project will alter the slope at a point approximately 15 feet west of and below Benson Road. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) Some small "pockets" of isolated steep slopes are within the area of the proposed Home Depot building/access road. These slope areas have been analyzed pursuant to Renton Development Regulations Section 4-3-070C3ii, and have an average slope of approximately 34 percent and, thus, are exempt from the limitations on clearing, grading, and development under Section 4-3-070F. These slopes occur along a lobe of fill extending into the northeast portion of the site. This lobe is 25 to 30 feet 5 6254.004[BKC/ph/mm/sm] Environmental Checklist above the proposed site grade and was apparently formed entirely from coal tailings from early mining operations from the hill to the east. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The soils report indicates that the site is generally underlain with coal tailings (6 to 10 feet thick) over alluvial soils (11 to 91 feet thick) over bedrock (sandstone) to terminus of the borings. Layers of peat deposits and other fill materials were also encountered randomly throughout the site. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. The alluvium soils are susceptible to settlement with the additional loads from the 'proposed development, and have a high risk of liquefaction for the design earthquake. See Geotechnical Information Report for detailed discussion and analysis of the on-site conditions. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. It is estimated that approximately 45,700 cubic yards of material would be cut and 19,300 cubic yards of material would be stripped. Approximately 6,600 cubic yards of fill material would be required. Approximately 75 percent of the excavated material may be suitable for use as fill, depending upon the time of year of construction. As a result, up to 58,400 cubic yards may be removed from the site, with the remainder being used for on-site fills. On-site soils are moisture sensitive and could be difficult for use as structural fill if exposed to wet weather. The type of fill material will primarily depend on the grain size and moisture content at the time of placement. Soils with less than 5 percent fines are recommended for fill material placed during wet weather, whereas material with 10 percent fines is acceptable during prolonged periods of dry weather. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Soil erosion could occur in connection with the proposed site development. With removal of existing on-site paving and excavation of the vegetation and slope materials on the east portion of the site, adjacent to Benson Road, it is possible that erosion may occur during rain and/or wind storms during the construction phase. To minimize the potential for soil erosion, a temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan will be designed and implemented in accordance with the City of Renton requirements. 6 6254.004[BKC/ph/mm/sm] Environmental Checklist g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? After project construction, approximately 63 percent of the 15.98 acre parcel would be covered with impervious surfaces, including asphalt and concrete paving, buildings and walkways. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any. Temporary erosion and sedimentation control plans will incorporate site work recommendations made by GeoEngineers,Inc.,and Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Erosion control measures would be designed in temporary erosion control plans, approved by the City of Renton, and implemented during the construction stage. The exact erosion and sedimentation controls will be applied during construction, depending upon the time of year, the length of time soils are exposed, and the actual conditions encountered upon excavation. Examples of temporary erosion control measures would be the provision of berms, swales, drainage ditches, siltation ponds, and siltation fences. If required, disturbed areas could be protected against erosion with temporary cover until construction is complete and vegetation has been established. Samples of materials would include jute matting, or clear plastic 'sheeting. Interceptor swales, straw bale barriers, silt fences, and straw mulch may also be applied for temporary erosion protection of exposed soils. Stabilized construction entrances and wash pads may also be required at the beginning of construction and maintained during the duration of the project. See the Geotechnical Information Report (October 15, 1999) for additional recommended earthwork and site preparation measures unique to this site, including the use of pilings for floor slabs/foundations and structural retaining walls along the east slope areas. The preliminary recommendations for the retaining walls are outlined on pages 16 through 19 of this report. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Site development would result in possible minor impacts to the existing air quality as a result of: • Dust generated during the grading stage. • Minor amounts of exhaust from construction vehicles. Following construction, emissions will be similar to typical retail facilities including carbon monoxide,nitrogen oxides,sulfar oxides,hydrocarbons,and particulate matter resulting from new customer vehicles on the subject property. Due to the number 7 6254.004[BKC/ph/mm/sm] Environmental Checklist of vehicle trips in the site vicinity during weekdays, vehicle emissions in the general area would be expected to remain at levels generally similar to existing conditions. On weekends, vehicle trips from the project may increase slightly, resulting in slight increases in the emissions noted above. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No off-site sources of emissions or odor exists that would adversely affect the proposed development. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Short term impacts of dust produced by construction could be reduced by using a number of techniques. Areas of exposed soils could be sprayed with water or other chemical dust suppressants. Areas that may be exposed for longer periods of time may be covered with suitable groundcover to prevent wind erosion. Additionally, techniques could be implemented to minimize conveyance of dirt onto streets, such as street sweeping/cleaning as periodically warranted during construction. 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The nearest surface water body would be the concrete-lined stormwater pond and concrete-lined drainage channel, mapped as a "stream and wetlands" on the City of Renton Wetland Inventory Map. This feature is located to the south of the proposed Home Depot area. The Wetland Delineation Report by Natural Resources Consulting, dated September, 1999, found that the concrete-lined drainage channel did not contain any vegetation, soils, or hydrologic conditions required in order for the area to be considered a wetland. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described water? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes, the proposed site clearing, grading, and development will occur within 200 feet of the drainage channel. 8 6254.004[BKC/ph/mm/sm] Environmental Checklist 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or I removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. No filling or dredging material is proposed in the concrete-lined drainage channel or stormwater pond. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. None proposed. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. The property is located within the Flood Zone X, according to the Flood Insurance Rate Map, FIRM No. 53033C0977F, revised May 16, 1995, King County, Washington, as prepared by the Federal Emergency ManagementAgency(FEMA). The Flood Zone designation X is an area determined to be outside of the 500-year floodplain. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No ground water will be withdrawn, nor will water be discharged to ground water. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources,if any(for example: Domestic sewage;industrial,containing the following chemicals...;agricultural;etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Because the site will connect to the Municipal sanitary sewer, no waste water will be discharged into the ground. 9 6254.004[BKUph/mm/sm] Environmental Checklist c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. All stormwater on this site is generated from on-site rainfall only. Existing development to the north and street systems on the remaining sides intercept all off-site runoff, with the exception of some slope runoff from Benson Road to the east. There is a culvert under Benson Road, which conveys runoff into an existing concrete-lined ditch running along the easterly edge of the site to a large culvert at Talbot Road South. This system will remain in place and not be disturbed. On-site runoff will be collected in a series of parking lot catch basins and conveyed to bioswales for water quality treatment prior to discharge to the aforementioned culvert at Talbot Road South (for drainage from south and east portions of the site) and the existing 18-inch/24-inch system along South Grady Way (for drainage from north and west portions of the site). This proposed separation of runoff approximates existing conditions. Storm detention is not proposed for this project, in that significantly more pervious area will be available following development than presently exists. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Without the proposed pre-treatment surface water could be contaminated by runoff containing trace quantities of oil and unspent hydrocarbons from cars on pavement parking and maneuvering areas. Additionally, stormwater runoff from the landscaped ,areas could result in minor amounts of fertilizers, insecticides, and/or herbicides into the stormwater system. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Water quality pre-treatment will be provided for the surface runoff areas in accordance with the King County Storm water Manual. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other cottonwood X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X shrubs X grass pasture 10 6254.004[BKC/ph/mm/sm] Environmental Checklist crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Trees and groundcover on portions of the South Grady Way and Talbot Road South frontage will be removed; approximately 37 trees over 6 inches in caliper, together with ground cover will be removed from the south side, directly adjacent to Benson Road, as depicted on the tree cutting and land clearing plan. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. d. Proposed landscaping,use of native plants,or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Landscaping would be installed and maintained in accordance with the high standards of Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., and in accordance with the City of Renton requirements. The proposed landscape plan will provide for approximately 78,800 square feet, or 11 percent of the total parcel, in formal landscaping. Additionally, approximately 56,000 square feet would remain in native open space, adjacent to Benson Road 'right-of-way. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or, are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish, bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The Home Depot site is located in the Puget Sound region, which is part of the Pacific Flyway, a known migratory route for migratory water fowl. 11 6254.004[BKCJph/mm/sm] Environmental Checklist d. !Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: On-site landscape areas, including the preservation of existing native open spaces, may provide some limited habitat for bird species and invertebrates. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric energy would be used for lighting, cooling, and miscellaneous power equipment. Natural gas may be used for heating. Propane would be stored on site near the south side of the building for fuel for forklifts used on the site. A 60 kW diesel generator on the south side of the building will supply temporary power in the event of an electrical outage. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The building design and energy conservation would be in accordance with the State of Washington model conservation standards for commercial buildings. Energy conservation will consist of an insulated building envelope, HVAC with heat recovery features, automatic energy management system, and energy efficient light fixtures. Skylights may also be provided, which would reduce daytime energy consumption. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No environmental hazards are known to exist on site. The operation of the project would not involve the use of substances presenting an unusual risk to health. Some on-site materials known to contain dangerous or hazardous materials would include paint, wood stain and solvents, PCV plastics, pool chemicals, adhesives, fertilizers, and pesticides for home use; these items are customarily sold in major hardware or home improvement stores, and are pre-packaged and ready for retail sale when delivered and stocked in the store. Packing and identification of these products complies with standards and criteria for consumer items established by the Environmental Protection Agency. Building and fire code provisions for storage of 1 2 6254.004[BKC/ph/mm/sm] Environmental Checklist these materials would be followed. Because all products sold at the store would be for off-site use, no special storage is required for used materials. As described 'above, propane gas would be stored in tanks near the eastern property line. Diesel fuel for the emergency generator would be stored in one 40-gallon double-lined tank above grade. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Special emergency services which may required would include fire, police, and emergency medical services, both during construction and after project completion. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Removal and disposal of any hazardous materials on site during demolition and/or construction will be accomplished according to appropriate State and Federal requirements and standards. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Noise generated from traffic within the 1-405 corridor and local roadways may be heard on site, but will not affect proposed commercial operations. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. On a short-term basis, noise will be associated with the site construction and building construction activities during the 6- to 7-month construction and merchandising period. This noise is expected to be generated 6 days a week from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. After project completion, noise will be principally created by the traffic associated with the commercial retail store operation between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m., 7 days a week. This noise will also include associated noise from truck deliveries and from the operation of on-site fork lift and the trash compactor. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: No noise mitigation measures are proposed, due to the substantial buffer provided by the native open space area remaining to the south. 13 6254.004[BKC/ph/mm/sm] Environmental'Checklist 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently vacant. The Puget Sound Energy buildings will be demolished. 'Land uses on each side of the subject property are as follows: • To the north is the Renton City Hall. Farther to the north, directly across South Grady Way, are a variety of commercial and multi-family residential properties. • To the south and east, are Benson Road and 1-405. '• To the west, across Talbot Road South is the Renton Village Center, a commercial shopping center. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. ,Unknown. c. Describe any structures on the site. Two concrete buildings exist on site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? All existing buildings will be demolished. e. What is the current zoning designation of the site? Commercial Arterial, CA, with Auto Mall District "B" overlay. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Employment Area Commercial. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? None. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. As noted earlier, the City of Renton Sensitive Areas Maps depict a "stream" on site, and wetlands (Wetland No. W-31) of approximately 1 acre in size to the south. This wetland has been reviewed by Natural Resources Consulting (NRC). In the Wetland Delineation Report, dated September 1999, NRC found that there is a concrete-lined 14 6254.004[BKC/ph/mm/sm] Environmental Checklist stormwater pond and concrete-lined drainage channel on site, which do not contain any vegetation soils or hydrologic conditions necessary for the area to be considered a wetland. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approximately 200 people would be employed when the proposed Home Depot Store is completed. This would include both full-time and part-time employees. Approximately 65 to 80 employees would work at the store, depending upon the day of the week and hours of operation. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. Puget Sound Energy has vacated the facilities. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None. Not applicable. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Compliance with the City zoning, parking, landscaping and building codes would ensure that the project is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low income housing. None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. Not applicable. 1 5 6254.004[BKC/ph/mm/sm] Environmental Checklist 10. AESTHETICS a. 'What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. Maximum building height will be 36 feet at the entry tower, which would be constructed with a drivit or concrete plaster finish. The principal exterior building material will be pre-cast textured concrete tilt-up panels. The outdoor garden center would be enclosed within an ornamental iron fence. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? The views from the adjacent properties and streets into the subject development will Ibe altered by the development of the proposed Home Depot project. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: • The Home Depot has established a consistent corporate exterior image for their buildings. The palette includes cast reveals and a large accent stripe using CMU block as a contrasting material and color. The two-tone paint scheme incorporates the metal canopies which run along a portion of the front elevations. • These reveals color bands and the shadows cast from the various depth of the canopies of all contribute to the reduction of the scale of the tilt-up walls. • The wall sign package is designed to complement the color scheme and add an additional level of detail to the upper parapet band. • Additionally, the use of landscaping on the site perimeter and inside the parking lot will assist in breaking up the asphalt parking lot area. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposals produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The primary source of light produced by the project would be from the building and parking lot areas. Site lighting will be designed and incorporated into the project to provide a downward illumination and to minimize spillover lighting onto adjacent parcels. Light would be produced principally during the evening hours of operation. 16 6254.004[BKC/ph/mm/sm] Environmental'Checklist b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No safety hazards would occur from lighting or glare from the project proposal. Landscaping along the site perimeter would assist in minimizing light and glare impacts from the property on the public roadway. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? The only existing off-site sources of light or glare would be headlamps from automobiles on South Grady Way, Talbot Road South, and Benson Road, but are not expected to affect this project. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: All outdoor lighting would use shielded luminaries to direct light downward and to minimize the backward flow of lighting onto neighboring properties and the adjoining streets. 12. RECREATION a. What designation and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. Not applicable. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers to be on or next to the site. If so, generally describe. None known. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. 17 6254.004[BKGph/mm/sm] r i Environmental Checklist c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None. Not applicable. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Public streets serving the subject property include South Grady Way, and Talbot Road South. The proposed access includes two new driveways from South Grady Way, including a signalized intersection with Williams Avenue; and a right-in/right-out only driveway near the South Grady Way/Talbot Road South intersection. A third point of access will be available through the City Hall surface parking lot (under construction). A full-turning movement driveway will also be constructed to Talbot Road South via an easement through the residual property. Benson Road South will not provide access to the site, due to the grade differential on that road. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? There is a Metro Transit bus pullout on South Grady Way approximately 50 feet east of the Talbot Road South intersection. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Approximately 612 spaces would be provided to serve the Home Depot and future development. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets,not including driveways? If so,generally describe(indicate whether public or private? Minor amounts of curb, gutter, and sidewalk along South Grady Way and Talbot Road South would be re-constructed where existing driveways will be closed. Additionally, Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., would install a traffic signal at Williams Avenue and construction of associated channelization at this intersection of South Grady Way and Williams Avenue. See Traffic Impact Analysis by The Transpo Group, Inc., dated November 1999. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. 18 6254.004[BKGph/mm/sm] s - i Environmental Checklist f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Approximately 3,530 net new daily trips would be generated by the Home Depot project, with 177 net new trips during the a.m. peak and 241 net new trips during the p.m. peak. Refer to the Traffic Impact Analysis, by The Transpo Group, Inc., dated November 1999. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The Home Depot would pay traffic mitigation fees based upon the net new daily trips generated by the Home Depot project with credit for the existing Puget Sound Energy buildings. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., will also construct minor street and sidewalk frontage improvements as described above, and install a new signal with associated channelization of South Grady Way and its intersection with Williams Avenue. Refer to the Traffic Impact Analysis by The Transpo Group, Inc., dated November 1999. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The project would require police and fire service. Police services would be required in connection with crime investigation, traffic accidents, and similar incidents. Fire service and emergency medical services would be required at a level that. is customarily associated with retail facilities. No school or health services are expected, as new employees are expected to be hired from the local labor force. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Home Depot employs private security personnel on site, which would result in less need for public police services. The building would be sprinklered, providing fire suppression response that would occur prior to arrival of emergency Fire Department services during a fire event. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other cable. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utilities providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. • Power and Natural Gas: Puget Sound Energy (PSE) • Telephone: U.S. West Communications • Cable: AT&T Cable Services • Water, Sanitary Sewer, and Storm: City of Renton All public utilities are within the right-of-way or are already on site. 19 6254.004[BKGph/mm/sm] Environmental Checklist C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there by any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: /b'G`/ce. - Date: /2—6-9 20 6254.004[BKGph/mm/sm] , , 4: 0294_ . _. __, ... • + CITY OF RENTON "P- FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU -NTO MEMORANDUM DATE: July 15, 1999 TO: L e€n Nicolay ler _ _._ " FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marsha l SUBJECT: Home Depot, 600 Blk. S. Grady Way vl Fire Department Comments: 1. The preliminary Fire flow is 5,600 GPM which requires one fire hydrant within 150 feet of the building and five additional hydrants within 300 feet of the building. A looped fire main is required by City Ordinance. 2. Provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are to be used or stored on site. 3. A fire mitigation fee of$32,500 is required based on $.52 a square foot of the building square footage. <.cycy�l j Vic-;%/% ` �'! . �s �.>` 4. Separate plans and permits are required for the fire sprinkler h and alarm system. P kler system v„ Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. -A • • .��� �S, 'O oy MEMORANDUM . 4 ' 9O�.76) O� DATE: 7/0 f 19 TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan, Review, Project Planner .• FROM: Jana Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: Uc* t POf LOCATION: W lirK O , GZAcb( Go-A't PREAPP NO. 11 59 A meeting with the applicant has been scheduled for I l'=CO A V\ , Thursday, �.10 L4 ?4 1 , in one of the 6 floor conference rooms (new City Hall). If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11:00 AM meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. • l ' Please submit your written comments to / � - ii Lik.CO A' (at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. 567,)_,L%- 6'7)14- Preapp2 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM • DATE: JULY 19, 19999 TO: LAUREEN NICOLAY FROM: NEIL WATTS ,1i2 w SUBJECT:' ' PREAPPLICATION REVIEW HOME DEPOT PROJECT We have reviewed the above listed project and have the following comments: WATER • There is an existing 18" water main in S Grady Way, and a 16" water main in Benson Road S. There are also several 8" and 6" water mains and four hydrants located on the site itself. • No additional water main extensions will be required for this project. • It is anticipated that the redevelopment credit for this site will eliminate the requirement for payment of system development charges for water and sewer. SEWER • Service to this site is provided by an 18" sewer main which runs across the southerly portion of the site from the east and into the system in Talbot Road S which then runs south before turning west across the Renton Village site connecting to the METRO Interceptor at Rainier and Grady. • No additional sewer main extensions will be required for this project. • It is anticipated that the redevelopment credit for this site will eliminate the requirement for payment of system development charges for water and sewer. SURFACE WATER • There is a drainage system from Renton Hill to the east which crosses under I-405 and Benson and crosses the southerly portion of the site in a combined culvert/ditch system. This system discharges into a developed pipe system in Talbot Rd S. There are also developed pipe drainage systems in S Grady Way and Talbot Road S adjacent to the site. • ., e 4• • , JULY 19, 1999 , , PAGE 2 ! �ie3 v , � 114..8.14/ el r pr--- etepni'eerPle.:e_ . /1)14DI/leimerkt. —lb j'a • A conceptual drainage plan and drainage report will be required for the site plan application for this project. The conceptual drainage plan shall include provisions water quality treatment in compliance with the requirements of the KCSWM. ` ?V 1zg t,o Aloe! ,C#J4 ce ct • The proposal as presented will not require detention, per the KCSWM. Since there are downstream flooding problems, any increase in the release rate from the site may require detention as a SEPA mitigation condition, even if the release rate is less than the allowed 0.5 cfs increase. • If there is no net increase in impervious surface on this site as part of the development • proposal, then there will be no system development charge for surface water required for this project. TRANSPORTATION • S Grady Way is fully improved with curb, gutters, sidewalks and street lighting adjacent to this project site. Benson Rd S is a paved two lane arterial, with gravel shoulders and no curbs or sidewalks adjacent to this project site. • City Code requires a project of this size to abut fully improved streets. This will require the G" vZ improvement of Benson Rd S adjacent to the site with curb, gutter and sidewalks for the entire ! . /jY ��" �J�� � frontage of the site. A request for waiver of this requirement may be made to the Board of (I sa ( Public Works. • A traffic report should be prepared for this project. This traffic report should address possible impacts to the signalized intersections at Talbot Rd S and S Grady Way and Rainier Av. S and S Grady Way. A traffic analysis should also be prepared for the proposed 9� 4,,,1, `''driveway onto S. Grady Way, with particular emphasis on discussion of the viability of left (,�I' ` turning movements in and out of the site. Trip generation values should be estimated for both the proposed use and the prior/existing uses on the site 1-rim p,I,LL u2A(/P17 . t�r ' ' ghltlitv • Traffic mitigation fees of$75 per net new average daily trip will be required for this project. --- =%J'C-/Cdt` fie, L -S ales`. GENERAL • The site plan application for this project must include a conceptual utility plan showing all • existing and proposed utilities, including sewer mains, manholes, water mains, valves, hydrants, drainage facilities, drainage mains and catch basins. All existing utility easements on the site must also be shown on the site plan. A complete conceptual drainage plan, with a Level 1 downstream analysis and aaropriate calculations for water quality treatment facilities_ and detention requirements shall also be included in this application. • All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a registered Civil Engineer. The construction permit application must include a itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,00 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. PREAPPLICATION COMMENTS Home Depot, 900.Block of South Grady Way July 27, 1999 The applicant, Puget Western Inc., has proposed to demolish all existing structures on the former Puget Power site and construct a new approximately 130,000 square foot retail building with approximately 580 (total listed in cover letter) to 620 (total listed on site plan) associated parking spaces. General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application materials for the above-referenced development proposal. The following . comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre- application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the Codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that review comments may need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the City's Development Regulations, Title 4 of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for $25.00, plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall. Previous Land Use Approvals for this Site: In December of 1998, the City approved an auto dealership at the same location under City File #LUA98-151. I have enclosed a copy of the Environmental Determination and the City's analysis, decision, and conditions of approval for this proposal. Some of the issues addressed will be applicable to this new proposal as well. Land Use Permits Required: The proposal will require environmental review and a Hearing Examiner Site Plan Approval. Processing time for the combined environmental review and site plan approval will be approximately 14 weeks, assuming no appeals are filed. The application fee is $2,500.00 plus 33 cents • per mailing label. A complete site plan/environmental application package is attached. A lot line adjustment may also be required (See next paragraph). If so, an additional $225.00 fee is required. Site Boundary Line Discrepancies: In December of 1998, the City approved a lot line adjustment involving the subject site--recording #9812109014, City File #LUA98-164. The site boundary shown on the preapplication site plan does not • match the site boundaries of the recorded lot line adjustment. The site boundaries on the formal site plan and environmental application package will have to conform to the recorded lot line locations or a new lot line adjustment will be required as part of the overall application. If the "site" will actually be comprised of a number of individual lots, these lots will need to be combined through.a concurrent lot line adjustment process. Any required parking or parking or site access which is not located on site will need to be addressed by either a lot line adjustment or easements. Depending on the final configuration desired, the lot line adjustment could be processed either prior to or concurrently with the site plan/environmental review. Processing time for lot line adjustments vary from submittal to submittal, but generally seems to take approximately 12 weeks until actual recording. Building and Utility Construction Permits Required: A building permit and a utilities construction permit will be required. At the applicant's option, these permits may be submitted simultaneously with the site plan application. The processing time for a new commercial building permit is approximately 6-8 weeks. Timing for the utility construction permit is less. Complete building and construction permit applications are attached. Uses Permitted: The subject site is zoned CA, Commercial Arterial with an "Automall District B" overlay. The proposed use is permissible within both the CA Zone and the Automall District B overlay zone. The Automall Area B regulations, attached, do not have much of an impact on the proposal, however, the following provision should be noted; Section 4-3-040D states: "Service areas shall not face public street areas." Loading areas and docks must be designed so they do not face Grady Way. Access and Driveway Requirements: RMC Section 4-4-0801 stipulates the driveway standards allowable for various uses. Allowable driveway width will • depend on whether or not the building(s) is classified as a commercial or industrial use. The applicant is proposing a driveway of 30 fe :t in width off of South Grady Way and may also be proposing additional access via easement(s) from Talbot Road South. A driveway width greater than 30 feet is usually only permitted for industrial developments or shopping centers, unless an administrative driveway modification is requested and approved: Due to the industrial type needs of this retail use, the City would likely approve a 50-foot driveway width if requested. There is no fee for this type of modification request. • Parking requirements: Parking requirements are based upon use and lot boundaries. Typically, all required parking must be located on the same lot as the building requiring the parking. The City Zoning Administator has determined that the parking requirements for the Home Depot use would be the same as for a large retail store: 4 to 5 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of retail floor area. Areas such as restrooms, hallways, mechanical rooms, and wall thickness are not counted toward the total floor area for the purposes of '°J � calculating required parking. Based up a total square footage of 130,000 square feet (without the required floor area deductions), the range of spaces permissible' would be 520 to 650 total parking spaces. It is likely that the applicant's proposal is in compliance. However, if the applicant's parking falls outside of the range of spaces permitted, an administrative parking code moLlification would need to be approved in order to obtain approval of the site plan. The decision - criteria for approving a modification request are listed in RMC Section 4-9-250D. There is no fee for this type of modification request. Stall.Sizes/Compact Spaces: The standard stall size permitted within the City is 9' by 20' with 24 feet of backout room. Compact stalls may be as small as 8.5' by 16'. Of the total spaces required, 30% of these may be compact. The site plan indicates the applicant is proposing less than the 30% maximum permitted • by the parking regulations. Section 4-4-080F8c explains provisions that may also permit a reduced stall length. The preliminary plan does not provide dimensions, so I was unable to determine compliance with the stall size or aisle requirements. Loading Space: It does not appear that the required loading space has been indicated on the plans yet. Since the proposed retail use(s);w 11 "require deliveries to it or shipments from it of people and merchandise", in addition to the required parking "adequate permanent off-street loading space shall {also} be provided". See RMC 4-4-080J1. Presumably, the building will have dock doors and these require a certain amount of clear area in front of each door (100 feet for dock high doors,'40 feet for ground level loading doors). Since the plans did not provide this level of detail, I was unable to determine compliance with the loading regulations. RMC Section 4-4-080J further explains these provisions. Setbacks: The proposed site plan indicates that the closest point of the structure is approximately 220 feet from the South Grady Way property line and about 80 feet from the Benson Road South property line. The CA Zone requires a 10-foot landscaped setback from theses property lines. No other setbacks are required by the CA Zone or the Automall Area B overlay in this instance. Landscaping and Pedestrian Connection Requirements: In addition to the 10-foot landscaping strip required along Grady Way, an additional 5% of the interior of the parking lot is required to be landscaped. •The landscaping area used to comply with this requirement on the previous site plan has been eliminated in the revised plan. The applicant will need to provide an analysis and site plan indicating compliance with the 5% interior-landscaping minimum. All required on-site landscaping must be sprinklered. Section 4-2-120 regarding "pedestrian access" requires provision of"direct, clear and spate pedestrian walks from sidewalks to building,entries and internally from buildings to adjacent retail properties". The formal site plan submittal should indicate the location, width and materials for the proposed pedestrian walks. • Height: The maximum permissible building height in the in the CA Zone is 50 feet. Lot Coverage: The maximum lot coverage for the CA Zone is 65% of the total site area for projects not providing structured parking. The applicant will be required to provide an analysis of lot coverage on the face of the formal site plan submitted as part of the Site Plan Approval/Environmental Review application. Signage: No signage information is provided as part of this preliminary proposal. The City Sign Regulations permit 20 percent of each building facade to be used for wall .signage. In addition, the Grady Way Street frontage entitles the development to a free standing, roof or projecting sign not exceeding 150 square feet in area (300 sq. ft. total for all faces). The maximum freestanding sign height is 40 feet. Once a sign proposal is available, I would be happy to review it for code compliance. Outdoor Storage: Any outdoor storage must be screened pursuant to Section 4-2-120 A. Trash Enclosures: The code mandates that refuse containers be located outside of required setback areas. Trash enclosures must be screened pursuant to RMC 4-4-09007. We recommend that you obtain Rainier Waste Management's approval of your proposed dumpster location(s) prior to submitting your site plan application package. The site plan ?-)plication must indicate all proposed dumpster locations and elevation drawl;igs indicating the proposed method of screening. Sensitive Areas: While the site is not indicated as sensitive on any of the City's Sensitive Areas maps, wetlands and a stream are known to be located on or near the proposed development site. If these areas are included within the project site, more detailed stream information and a wetland delineation and report will be required. A Geotechnical Report will also be required due to soil /liquifaction potential. • Mitigation Fees and Other Development Related Fees: A listing of all the City's Development related fees is attached. Phone numbers are included for the Divisions/Departments'responsible for the various fees. Comments by: Laureen Nicolay (425) 430-7294 /47(Ceet,--i /7 7 ^-e—(2 Ce-f//47' /112-e---4-Q-sC • • Qom'' 9812109014 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT A PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 17,THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 19, AND THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 20 ALL IN TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON . I t,' I t� II or V I I fo \ P 4 i + . / / .0 90 - i• b � tE BASED ON CITY ,11 D 4 j �t ?Ou FIRST AYERICANI , 886-9K, DATED ' fi % EN CONSULTING d R IS B RGHAUSEN ' ` • `C THE SURVEYED THE REFERENCED • o� / ENGINEERS. INC. . :Lys CONDITION TO I ,�' �g�� ENGINEERS. INC. 1 7 j AIION WAS USED TO I • t�V.4 d lIE CONTROLLING . , t E%CEEDED THOSE mLNT HAS BEEN I IHIS SURVEY. f I I i. 1 O . I P" e e\Q i �0 �q' . • AM Q( 'DRAWN u.td \� I�I qS Q-GHAVS 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH DR�rRt� PCW /c P p' KENT, WA 98032 uIE 10/?9/98 su. • December 14, 1998 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: Robert Dwors Autonation USA Corp. • Autonation USA File No.: LUA-98-151,SA-H,V-H LOCATION: 915 S Grady Way SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To construct auto sales facility consisting of 53,200 square • foot showroom/service building, 506 vehicle display parking, . 129 vehicle service/storage parking and 193 customer/employee parking SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on November 24, 1998. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area;the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the December I, 1998 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. • The hearing opened on Tuesday,December 1, 1998, at 9:05 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Vicinity map application, proof of posting,proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 3: Site plan Exhibit No.4: Landscape plan Exhibit No. 5: Building elevations Exhibit No. 6: Stream buffer/wetland drawing Robert Dwors • Autonation USA Corp. Autonation USA File No.: LUA-98-151,SA-H,V-H December 14, 1998 Page 2 The hearing opened,with a presentation of the staff report by PETER ROSEN,Project Manager,Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way,Renton, Washington 98055. The applicant seeks site plan approval and approval of a variance to construct an auto sales facility consisting of a 53,200 square feet showroon/service building,retail display parking for 506 vehicles, 129 parking stalls for vehicle service/storage area and 193 parking stalls for customers and employees. The entire site is approximately 20.19 acres. The present owner has agreed to sell 1.19 acres on the north part of the site to the City of Renton for City Hall parking improvements. The site is currently owned and used by Puget Sound Energy for storage and maintenance of electrical and gas equipment. The three existing buildings on site would be demolished. Soil remediation has been done to the site regarding underground tanks. The primary access into the proposed site would be off Talbot Road with an emergency access off South Grady Way which would be gated. There is a .84 acre Category II wetland at the southeast corner of the site. The eastern portion of the wetland slopes up to Benson Road. There is a concrete drainage channel on the west edge of the wetland that is a tributary of Rolling Hills Creek. The code requires a 25 foot buffer width from the high water mark of creeks. The applicant initially requested a variance as they were providing 19 feet instead of the 25 foot required buffer along the western edge of the stream channel where an access road intruded at various points. After reviewing the matter, it was concluded that no variance was required because of the existing conditions of asphalt and compacted gravel that border the drainage channel,thus requiring no land clearing. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC) issued a Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated with fire and traffic mitigation fees imposed. The City Council approved a Comprehensive Plan (CP)amendment and rezone for this site on October 5, 1998, changing it from Employment Area-Industrial to Employment Area- Commercial,with the rezone from Heavy Industrial and Commercial Office to Commercial Arterial (CA)zoning. The proposal is consistent with the objectives and policies of the CP designation which is intended for land uses that require high visibility and access to large volumes of automobile traffic. The proposal conforms to the site rezone as automobile sales are a permitted use in the CA zone. Automobile service and repair are also permitted uses. This application meets all setback requirements as the building is located in the center of the site surrounded with large areas of parking. It also meets building height and lot coverage requirements. This site is now in the Automall Area B and the landscape standards require a 15 foot • wide landscape perimeter strip along the street frontages,and a minimum 2.5 percent of the gross site area to be provided as onsite landscaping to be focused around building entries and site entries. Applicant is providing approximately 15.8 percent of the gross site area in landscaping,not including the wetland and the embankment up to Benson Road. The existing trees along Talbot Road will be removed. Also included is 7,464 square feet of parking lot landscaping. The code also requires pedestrian connections from street frontages to building entries. The proposal does not include these and staff is recommending that the site plan be revised to accommodate pedestrian connections from South Grady Way and Talbot Road. This proposal will not directly impact the existing Category II wetland. In terms of the buffer, the applicant is providing 25 feet of buffer on the west edge of the wetland in a planted berm. This would separate the drainage channel and the wetland from the access road. Buffer averaging is allowed and the applicant has proposed to make up for the shortfall to the east of the wetland. The concrete drainage channel has water in it year round, but no fish have been observed in it. The site is bounded on the east and south by Interstate 405 with a steep vegetated embankment to Benson Road _ to the east. To the north is Renton City Hall and office uses are located to the west. The site plan layout is not expected to have an impact on surrounding properties nor would the operation of the facility create adverse Robert Dwors Autonation-USA Corp. Autonation USA File No.: LUA-98-151,SA-H,V-H December 14, 1998 Page 3 • impacts on surrounding property or uses. The primary access drive has been located as far to the south on Talbot as possible so as not to interfere with the busy intersection of Talbot and Grady Way. Staff recommends site plan approval subject to the following conditions: (1) that applicant comply with the ERC mitigation measures of payment of fire and traffic mitigation fees; (2)that applicant revise the site plan to provide direct pedestrian connections from sidewalks along South Grady Way and Talbot Road South to the building entries. • Pat Donnelly, 3050 Main Street,#350, Irvine,CA 92614, applicant representative herein, addressed security issues. He stated that behind the service building where vehicles are kept for service there is a 6 foot masonry • wall surround. The rest of the site has an 18 inch high rail fence to prevent cars being driven offsite other than through the appropriate exits. He further detailed Autonation's sales approach and its opposition to pedestrian accessto the vehicle display areas. Regarding the industrial waste water system, it discharges into the sanitary system after going through oil-water separator. That includes the service area and the car wash. The car wash has a recycle system. Mark Steepy, 1201 Third Avenue,#900, Seattle, Washington 98101, applicant representative herein, stated that there is a hydraulic connection between the wetland and the stream buffers and it occurs next to Talbot where the stream is in a concrete channel and ends about 20 feet short of Talbot. It then goes into a culvert underneath Talbot. During large storm events water will go out into the wetland. In many locations, but not all, the wetland goes to the concrete channel,so the driveway has been offset 25 feet from the western edge of the wetland. Neil Watts, Plan Review Supervisor,Development Services Division, City or Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98055, addressed the issue of traffic at the intersection of Talbot and Grady Way. Because of the type of use of the proposed facility, it is not expected to generate traffic at peak rush hour times. The conflict of left-hand turns into the site and the left-turn lane from Talbot to Grady was studied. It was determined that the proposed access was desirable for this site. If at a later time the turning proposes a problem, the City can require C-curbing to limit access. Mr. Watts further addressed street improvement requirements along Benson Road, Grady Way and Talbot. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 10:05 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION • Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Robert Dwors for Autonation USA, filed a request for approval of a Site Plan for an automobile sales complex. - 2. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. • Robert Dwors - Autonation USA Corp. Autonation USA File No.: LUA-98-151,SA-H,V-H December 14, 1998 Page 4 3. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M)for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located at 915 South Grady Way. The site is located on the southeast corner of the intersection of South Grady Way and Talbot Road South. The site is immediately west of the new Renton City Hall and is the site of a Puget Sound Energy complex that will be removed. 6. The subject site consists of a very irregularly shaped parcel that is approximately 1,700 feet long(north to south)by 1,000 feet long. The site and surrounding streets are not quite oriented in a north-south or east-west direction, making some locations a bit ambiguous. The current owner, Puget Sound Energy, proposes selling a 1.30 acre portion at the northeast corner of the site to the City for use by the new City Hall. The remaining parcel, approximately 18.89 acres,will be used for the proposed complex, open space,wetland preservation and hillside protection. 7. The eastern third of the site is dominated by the steep slope located between the subject site and Benson Road South. The site also has an approximately .84 acre Category 2 wetland in the southern end of the site. A stream confined to a concrete channel flows below the steep Benson slopes. 8. The site currently contains a number of buildings which have a footprint of approximately 81,241 square feet and the site is surfaced with a mix of various paving materials and compacted gravel. 9. A portion of the site was part of the original City when it was incorporated in 1901. The remainder of the site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinances 738 and 1547 enacted in March 1925 and May 1956 respectively. 10. The subject site was reclassified Commercial Arterial (CA)with the adoption of Ordinance 4404 in June 1993. 11. As part of the original application,the applicant proposed installing planting adjacent to the creek and work within the 25 foot setback area required around creeks. The applicant applied for a variance to allow this restoration.work. Staff determined that the variance is only required if vegetation is to be cleared. In this case the creek-is surrounded by asphalt and gravel and no vegetation will be removed as there is none in that area. A variance is,therefore, not needed. • 12. The applicant proposes developing an approximately 53,200 square foot combined showroom and service building for the sales and servicing of automobiles. There will be a number of associated outdoor facilities including a delivery area, display parking area, a test track and employee and customer parking areas. 13. The building is approximately 350 feet long by 150 feet deep. The long axis of the building will be aligned with Grady Way but is set back from Grady by approximately 250 feet. The building will be set back approximately 300 feet from Talbot. The proposed building is approximately 34 feet tall. The facade will be articulated. The building will be taller at the entrance and have columnar treatments at the corners of the front, south or southwest facade. • Robert Dwors - Autonation USA Corp. Autonation USA File No.: LUA-98-151,SA-H,V-H December 14, 1998 Page 5 14. The proposed building will cover approximately 6 percent of the parcel whereas coverage of 65 percent is allowed. 15. A large part of the complex will consist of parking areas. There will be 506 stalls along the Grady and Talbot frontages for sales display. There will be. 129 stalls for service storage located near the northeast corner of the site. To the rear or east side of the site there will be 193 customer and employee parking stalls. 16. There will only be one primary access driveway to the site. The driveway will be located along Talbot: It will enter the site and traverse up the eastern edge of the site, adjacent to the channelized creek. The . driveway will permit both left and right turns into and out of the site. It will be approximately 650 feet • south of the Grady Way intersection to avoid turning conflicts. Staff and the applicant worked on creating a driveway that would not interfere with either the arterial flow or turning movements. The City would reserve the right to alter access if problems arose. A second gated driveway would provide emergency access along Grady Way. 17. There would be extensive site landscaping that will continue the automall streetscape theme. The theme requires 15 feet of landscaping along Grady and Talbot including a grass berm and red maples at 25 feet on center. Unfortunately this will result in the removal of the existing mature plantings found along Talbot and possibly on other locations on the subject site. The applicant should check to see if its mature plantings may be appropriately substituted in certain aspects of its landscaping plans. The applicant will be providing approximately 15.8 percent landscaping over the site. Plantings are concentrated along the building facades and at entry points to the site. • 18. The applicant will be providing a minimum 19 foot stream buffer and a minimum 25 foot wetland buffer. The City regulations require preservation of the .84 acre Category 2 wetland. The applicant will employ wetland buffer averaging to provide additional buffer along the east side of the wetland where the steep slopes prevent development in any event. A bermed wetland buffer will replace paving between the access road and the wetland. The channel in which the creek flows is approximately 3 feet deep and 4 feet wide. The applicant proposes a dense buffer with evergreens and other mass plantings to create a habitat and discourage intrusions. As noted, it will have a minimum width of 19 feet. • 19. Surface water will be directed to a biofiltration swale near Grady Way. Contaminated waters will be dumped to the sewer system. The car wash will utilize a water recycling system. 20. The site is designed to accommodate the driving public and staff has recommended that an additional pedestrian link to Grady be provided. • 21. In order to provide security,the perimeter of the site along the accessible street frontages will be secured by pipe railing and not by cyclone fencing. • 22. The project will generate approximately 1,520 daily vehicle trips. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The site plan ordinance provides a number of specific criteria for reviewing a site plan. Those criteria are generally represented in part by the following enumeration: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; Robert Dwors Autonation USA Corp. Autonation USA File No.:LUA-98-151,SA-H,V-H December 14, 1998 Page 6 • b. Conformance with the Building and Zoning Codes; c. Mitigation of impacts on surrounding properties and uses; d. Mitigation of the impacts of the proposal on the subject site itself; e. Conservation of property values; f. Provision for safe and efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation; g. Provision of adequate light and air; h. Adequacy of public services to accommodate the proposed use; The proposed use satisfies these and other particulars of the ordinance. 2. The proposed use is compatible with a variety of goals of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed site plan preserves the wetland and steep slope and while the creek remains embedded in a concrete channel,enhanced landscaping will improve its appearance. The use itself will create additional . employment as called for in the Comprehensive Plan for this area. 3. The proposed building meets the bulk,height and setback requirements of the Building Code. The plan also meets the requirements imposed by the automall overlay in the additional setbacks and . landscaping. 4. The proposed use will generate more traffic in the area but staff reports that the traffic can be handled by the street system. The one driveway has been located to avoid interference with intersection turning movements at Grady and Talbot and most of the traffic will be generated during off-peak hours. Other than the traffic and possibly more comings and goings than the current use,there should be minimum impacts on any surrounding uses. 5. As noted,the applicant will be increasing the landscaping found on the site although potentially sacrificing the existing mature.plantings now found.on the site. The creek corridor will be enhanced, the wetland buffered appropriately and the slope retained in its current state.•The building appears well-designed with articulations that should reduce its apparent bulk and the generous setbacks from the street will reduce its visual appearance. The security fencing will be minimally intrusive but reduce the chance of theft. The Grady corridor with its enhanced landscaping should be welcoming to both drivers and pedestrians. The applicant should provide an additional pedestrian connection to the Grady corridor even though the site is automobile oriented. 6. The redevelopment of the site will probably help property values and should increase the overall tax • base of the City. 7. Presumably the applicant and staff have determined that only one driveway will be adequate and safe for a complex of this size. The circulation patterns within the site seem safe and adequate with internal signs directing the flow of arrivals. The City always maintains the necessary discretion to limit turning movements into or out of a site if problems arise. Robert Dwors Autonation USA Corp. Autonation USA • File No.: LUA-98-151,SA-H,V-H December 14, 1998 Page 7 8. The generally low-rise nature of the building coupled with its location should not impede the entry of light and air to the site. 9. The site is served by City utilities which should have sufficient capacity. 10. In conclusion, the City determined to extend the automall designation in this direction and the proposed use is an appropriate use given that decision. DECISION: The proposed site plan is approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall comply with the ERC mitigation measures prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. Applicant shall revise the site plan to provide direct pedestrian connections from the sidewalks along South Grady Way and Talbot Road South to the building entries. The revised site plan shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. ORDERED THIS 14th day of December, 1998. FRED J. KA AN HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 14th day of December, 1998 to the parties of record: Peter Rosen Pat Donnelly Mark Steepy 1055 S Grady Way 3050 Main Street,#350 1201 Third Avenue,#900 Renton, WA 98055 Irvine, CA 92614 Seattle, WA 98101 Neil Watts • 1055 S Grady WA Renton, WA 98055 TRANSMITTED THIS 14th day of December, 1998 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman,Plan/Bldg/PW Admin. Members, Renton Planning Commission . Jim Hanson, Development Services Director Chuck Duffy,Fire Marshal Mike Kattermann,Technical Services Director Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Larry Meckling, Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Sue Carlson, Econ. Dev.Administrator South County Journal Robert Dwors - Autonation USA Corp. Autonation USA File No.: LUA-98-151,SA-H,V-H December 14, 1998 Page 8 Pursuant to Title IV,Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m.,December 28, 1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact,error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper. . An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV,Chapter 8, Section 16,which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. If the Examiner's Recommendation-or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as • Appeals to the City Council. ��• �• � PROJECT • 4L ..,. •". - AOIONIA1.21: Q :' e, JONES AVE S�� Op:'f• .......... i 4P• NIGH AVE " S • o ti F cP�' GRANT "'AVE S �' ,o r . RENTON ev AVE ttZ S ` .4` F '9f. �EEC, h (.Cr. • CEDAR avE S •p`^ C� �f C0. iit . ..... W A Q��' Illa, � • „,„ s s 9‘10..A . WILLIAA5 AVE N 4ffWELL ` • :..'` S�1 AVE s -- _ WILL .: 1ALB0T F.OAO 40 a AVE S .: tppANgtt.H c•-, • BURNETT AVE $. •J' a ' %RENIGN VILLAGE v rn LOGAN AVE S 0 f CENTER .,: vi f L in- ... ( z e •9 -7' z to N RENTON. } 9 AIRPORT 3 0 R N10N N " ,� SCHOOL® 9 0 3 DAVIS AVE S o c •o� y ~ to ML1DA12.44 pVE S n ® INN A.hc . AVE r .f IRO BuS A .. LAKE t IM1;� R�iK k RIDE ®kAIN=RPVE7167 !!!!!!!L. E VALLEl FD S0 • r AVE I t v� ,G L J N x LIND : AVE SW till ! t G I. p " 1 VP Ce Q n I • vl I5 . / , • . • • 0 ,1:1...: ®.,, ,,..„,„ •Consulting •Engineers FIGURE .• Ii 1201 Third Avenue. Suite 900 VICINITY MAP Seattle. Washington 98101 .• (206) 622-5822 Fax (206) 622-8130 N.T.S. . . elto“ SKil MASH •v e mosupe T . at AV --- • . ---.-------------- • ...-. __ T i-----7;"47"'"-. te- .., ---..r--z--...,- --.4-•••••-... 1 • IR 11141144k%7 PFICPCGED '•• ' PROJECT PCOPERTI LtE 1 • I 4-- . .. I .• .1s7 .."i „ s N:Z1 • • : 1•G' ,,. • AM srrE r,...;) • . 4.1.0 4•.• :,.. 4-7-.4.."--.... 111‘ AMEN= IC ,,,,.. .• ;.4_,...-•a • • . • I-.:!•••:: , ; • :, • ,, ...;.‘ AREA TO 411111141.11‘11.10. "' 4.1.411111 • liE SCLD— r I....:':'. .1 I 1 .. • '''.. , • . !Iry ....ss,„........... • W w, ti: IllEnum.111 1011.441"•‘, \••••.-, ‘k. „ 1 '. ' 1r - Y'' . \V\ • .............):: • ......,'•':.I : - ';'•• .% ''i-. •L•wo, STACITO1 ,N —.Ku 111111: 1111111111111711=11111.11111 ). I i',2.•%9TPAJTO43 „ ,,.. •..' ••., . . r.• . •••,,... •Lt— i ::•k:.•• .••.• •• • - ,/:::. :•• ..•• •, C .7.C••••7J5'1•11 • . t" •••••,........ ..........••••, •.::. 00X1.2 5W1C113 , BMW:ACME N, v11pb.„ AWIIIIIIell I \ 'L i i••••,.77.1-:-_• I .?v.:: Z•SLOM .. .s• s ,,VZ.).a.....‘::,:-,..:. • • - II - [' • •. GATE -••••• •• 8:2 ✓ ',........... N.It•lor ...4.4 1 \l'(;i4c..;t„,.•• '.-• r- '.i'' •.• 144:' . . ''', •....4,.., ,. '.,...\;.....sr , N„ :5- s"..;:::•-•:..4.:.7:;',:!,...•.."V, i '''',`«'''''• ' ' II .,:.'...7,"" , .. • • .. .., , OVERVAD • s, s,,,....... • OTIECTICNAL,• N •i? '...,,,, 43.10,.... •, L \,,„;;;;::::!;,:CATE -•.•••.:.;./ /.,. •. . 44'D •••... ' \•f..!..'''S'.•• !.•;,...• . . . s...... ft3,,,,, •••••....... N.... ci; • ll t• IT ;,,w • ; ,.., •;;:::•••• .• 6AR W"H. (LEST PAP1M3% ;,••••• „A....... -• 7' PK:POSED ''.C:‘\ ‘• •/..,::::•,.• i . ',.. N. /"1 ••....\\• .•••,,. • rfcrEFrrr L.I.E ii • . VICINITY MAP ‘s<Kt.(:. •44N4410\\\\FACLITT o /7 ---'11-$4. toms . ,,,--2=5,40 -, SOO:r•yea, ; •V,/ ,f4 ./c\A'• ,•.\ / ,/. ••••• s, .........,..„,../' ; • •• •'‘•• 'MN •• \ INI. .., ...,. ,/.. , .. _-•-„,--- / 4 /t--\,-‘\‘'. 0.1711-EA13 s 1% I ,...- • ( VSWAL33, . \ ,/ .. .,... ; „;\Ns:,\.• .. ','\41.111po/ DIFIEGIKAAL SIGH s.„...... . '',....., ' l , CA' ''''• \ • . . ... . • / -,*.% ' 6‘cc.. .S .s:', /..'• .... .-1310FLTFIATION SW • 3.,., .) ..,•.‘.(.,."• • .C.b •,./ %.,40 O. • •••• „.... -...,k., . , . • //.•••>. sy., , 3,}%.21. • • . / „e' 4. .-(6 •• .• i: ‘\.\ .‹.FET..: • \ \\\.•. U.WRAY \ • , 2 stuis ., * . •,•', 31:ANIOCALI •..••••, 't,•2‘';'• '• •\. . 1\ ''' / . ..t...., • .. 3%3(ALLa \ • \. ••, S - ...' • ,, , \•;. ° ,,, .: ,,•.:,:\••• . ‘.' 's . ts' RC .\ .'s/,' . \ • -7-; ECaITW-ACCO*E1 3A"C3C EIWCSS E1WSCT'THai ,,E \ ,..:\..,..'.••••• ', S..,.."7..:'. .:,.,,I•rAk. 6. 4:1.....•..1/,f,a:.x•N\:,t.i. .,•.N*'.,.,....\..,.'''•••..."•',"•-'.,-•.,•,.•=-•'.•--...,s•...'...\..,\'*/'•s. ^...:,'.''''•:,:'.••..'.-v•••.•,. „ ' \ / V \ . „' .Z ,1 ' .' . \ , , ' , '.-i:,\ ' ‘ ,. , , •, \\ ' : • ' ' f rw \\ \ "•, • „\ ‘ . , ••• , • if: ‘ . " 0 ,.., .corut %) • / •' •'•% ., „ . - • ., . /.\...... 4. ••••,..............._ 1... W. • •20,1 SIMI-3 • •N .. ..... 'SS• \ 1 . , .•. .. -. %,*... " • ..s.\\\\\" •411•11 1.\‘:.• ‘williy..y.v.,tim! \,: i \A 1-: ‘1,. • -----\ :::. '- NI STE DEVELOPMENT DATA :t. • ..,,?2 •\-•'''\ '4.4. 's' • ..••A•• ,J..•. .•.4, , \• .-\,\•` •"`C4'.••`••••. ' . . ‘;/' it: 2 z .\ • ,/, „ ,) _________ . IMMIIISIMISM 4(1114 Ontall \ C....•.. "... 4".s,..%'..• \\ ........ , '; 11C-1011C ti(11.101 %,\\ .. /..... ..,, N\'\ \\\\,,........;;;i1... ". ' .. ... S1,1 MM.. <.• . .,\\\\\.3%7...* PttaltRY ID. 11,10MIIIN UV IQ 1 MAS TALON I.0,0 UCH . MON..II \\\ ' •/( ' • . • . Mud•••011 .":" ., .7: La•... .1. ‘ \\ „ • ., . . . KA Tara ".•' iwow.0.1.064 rt.1: • . . \ 's \ //I.,..• -1;s, __ ... . • .. 3'0.'. \.......--..,' ..".''... 13 trIt HOD 2>1.tch DIA • 50l.4L.,.„...A....AI N.0. 9 'g .a.640 10030 /aMIt,WI 4. - )110133*NUnto11MY.0 :.47.0 [M ..00C S4 .......,:..,.. ....41 fr. . !•ME PALM • . 6 M0,11.4004 0.1 SM. i IMICI SICOL. ,7'NM, • WI so crelzr . .1 1.11r...•Poo. . 12,V,.." • raj • GNIXIM/0.0414 • 0 IOU% , 1014 0.7.11t raml0C 0&rats UR CO•Kaapg; tIll PAM • MS 11.4.0114 WA • FAML::......,,.....ICA:u.....:II- P.10•1 mg& • • • 0007.1 KA FOR SITE PLAN REWIEW ONLY ....... 10.1/015•11 110.014/0 RCO0 °Lint 3.to IVO.0.,(0 0A1071 V ..I•to NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION A te 1..05tYIS ot,mourn 4 m WI YOU.Ea 1401 .i.c 1::„0.1A I1.0.010 DM S•ri 0.//01wq ie ••••.4.1r,s/wn-w•D 1 • I4I.MO,/•41t, §.. Uwit S•ro • . e e GRAPHIC SCALE 3 g r9•—1—....2i-1i:1,4'_-_7_.,,,',_•.,• „- , c.o. . :0is„',.l...31A:.,..5t,:'7,t.. zva1..ee,ru hm.r..,'o."..--..„„...j0.9_...5.7..—- 4,•-4 1 TAIrd-A r...m Veea S.u9d0o0 2/72 • :',1;c..,;;,..:.g,...1(5).:?;IFACAjpe . • 'e.zzAU2T7O"1.—.N.a.A".T",VIO....,N USA . 1(.RC.E.A ALML0.43 u TtsaC. sE) .. Pr OASFSZAL• iliili Aii0Nat lMSALES RENTON WASHINGTON C10 ., . .v,, • -,7 f...MO 602 noe i...,,,,,,z,. ,,,AIRENEON•WASHIKITON - • - CONCEPTUAL: .7.1-1J4 . . ,or 1 _ . . . . , . . _ . .. . •. • • • . . _ e T.:, -I • .1 . ,,----4 ----, gig . • SOUTHEAST ELEVATION • fil-- • •era ` �• 'VD _ • • SOUTHWEST ELEVATION • `_ ^•F • fl 3 — . fl -T -- ii :. — ;-- ;I_ - 1 • NORTHWEST ELEVATION . H r L F I _ Elin n . ..111 t COLON ECM. I _. I .. J : �: ..... • NORTHEAST ELEVATION om -::.„, II AutoNatl on AUTONATION TIER ONE SALES FACILITY . II ELEVATIONS 'USA, RENTON, WA. O '1 '? Al (.IIAPMIC SCALE IN FEET �° W.YAM I1+9' SEPT 21, 1998 !ddILYJNIVN&Uidt•a 1.10 1!N\1.1Lt1OWtiIVUt:id initt K4.1 IOK;'wI IC" • City of Renton PUBLIC Department of Planning/Building/Public Works HEARING PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER • • A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Public Hearing Date: December 1, 1998 Project Name: Autonation USA .• Applicant/ Robert Dwors Address: Autonation USA Corp. 110 SE 6th Street, Ste. 1700 Ft Lauderdale, FL. 33301 Owner/ Bob Boyd Address: Puget Western Inc. 19515 Northcreek Pkwy.,#310 Bothell, WA. 98011 File Number: LUA-098-151, SA-H, V-H, ECF Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Description: Proposal for an auto sales facility consisting of a 53,200 sq. ft. showroom/service building, retail display parking for 506 vehicles, 129 parking stalls for vehicle service/storage, and 193 parking stalls for customers and employees. Three existing buildings on the site presently owned and used by Puget Sound Energy would be demolished. The primary access drive onto the site would be off Talbot Road South, with a gated emergency service driveway on South Grady Way. There is a .84 acre Category 2 wetland in the southeast corner of the site which would not be directly impacted by the proposal. A stream flows through a concrete channel on the east part of the site. Project Location: 915 S. Grady Way, southeast corner of intersection of S. Grady Way and Talbot Road S. I . ; II 11M11000. • -'N-::,..---,„,____:,_.„.. r ,,,,,,,. ,4-- orift,1 ir\ L. .......„ ,. „, „ ,,,,,, .,,„,, I-OF ,9 '''''''''''' iiter. 414,it ..,.f, .Y..n yt .. • • City of Renton P/B/PW Dapai,,.. a Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner • • AUTONATION USA LUA-98-151,SA-H, V-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 1, 1998 Page 2 of 9 B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record:: Puget Western Inc. 2. Zoning Designation: Commercial Arterial (CA) 3. Comprehensive Plan Employment Area Commercial (EAC) Land Use Designation: 4. Existing Site Use: Puget Sound Energy facility 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: S. Grady Way, Commercial, Renton City Hall East: Benson Road S., Interstate 405 South: Interstate 405 West: Office, Renton Village Shopping Center 6. Access: Talbot Road S., S. Grady Way 7. Site Area: 20.19 acres total 18.89 acres Autonation site 8. Project Data: area comments Existing Building Area: 81,241 sq. ft. (to be demolished) New Building Area: 53,200 sq. ft. Total Building Area: 53,200 sq. ft. C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date Incorporated 1901 Annexation 738 3-26-25 Annexation 1547 5-15-56 Comprehensive Plan 4498 2-20-95 Zoning Code 4404 6-7-93 D. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Zoning Code- Chapter 31, Section 4-31-10.4., Commercial Arterial (CA) Zone. 2. Zoning Code- Chapter 31, Section 4-31-33, Site Plan Review. 3. Chapter 9- Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance. HEXRPT2.DOC • • City of Renton P/B/PW Department ', Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner • AUTONATION USA LUA-98-151, SA-H, V-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 1, 1998 Page 3 of 9 F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Land Use Element-Employment Area-Commercial (EAC) Economic Development Element G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant seeks site plan review approval and approval of a variance to construct an auto sales facility consisting of a 53,200 sq. ft. showroom/service building, retail display parking for 506 vehicles, 129 parking stalls for vehicle service/storage, and 193 parking stalls for customers and employees. The facility would also include a vehicle service center for diagnostics, oil and lube, and vehicle detailing. The site is currently owned and used by Puget Sound Energy for the storage/maintenance of electrical and gas equipment. Three existing buildings existing on the site would be demolished. Puget Sound Energy has conducted soil remediation activities on the site in preparation of redevelopment. The primary access drive onto the site would be off Talbot Road South, with a gated • emergency service driveway on South Grady Way. There is a .84 acre Category 2 wetland in the southeast corner of the site which would not be directly impacted by the proposal. The applicant is proposing buffer width averaging to satisfy code requirements for wetland buffers. A stream flows through a concrete channel on the east and south part of the site. The applicant does not propose removal of the concrete channel and the proposal would not directly impact the creek. At present, there is no vegetated buffer adjacent to the creek, the entire buffer width consists of asphalt and compacted gravel. The applicant is proposing to remove the existing asphalt and compacted gravel surfacing directly adjacent to the creek and then incorporate a stream/wetland planted buffer area with a minimum width of 19 feet. The Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance requires a minimum 25 foot buffer width from the high water mark of creeks. Therefore, the applicant applied for a variance to allow the primary access road to encroach approximately 6 feet into the required 25 foot buffer. Upon analysis of the proposal, staff has determined that a variance is not required. The Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance code provision, Section 4-9-5:D. states that: "No tree cutting or land clearing is permitted within twenty-five feet (25) of any shoreline area, within twenty five feet (25) or the ordinary high water mark of creeks, in a wetland area, or on parcels where the predominant slope or individual slope is in excess of forty percent (40%) .. except enhancement activities." Because the existing buffer area is not vegetated and consists of asphalt and compacted gravel, there would not be any tree cutting or land clearing within the required buffer area. The code includes a definition of "land clearing" as follows: "The act of removing or destroying trees or ground cover including grubbing of stumps and root mat from any undeveloped lot, partially developed lot, developed lot, public lands or public right-of-way." The removal of impervious surfaces is not considered land clearing. Puget Western, present owner of the property, has agreed to sell approximately 1.19 acres on the north part of the site to the City of Renton for City Hall parking improvements. HEXRPT2.DOC —. • • City`of Renton P/B/PW Delia;.,,,aal Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner- . . AUTONATION USA LUA-98-151,SA-H, V-H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 1, 1998 Page 4 of 9 2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21 C, 1971 as amended), the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non- Significance, Mitigated on October 27, 1998. The mitigation measures are listed below. The comment/appeal period for the SEPA threshold determination ended on November 16. ' No comments or appeals were received. 3 COMPLIANCE WITH ERC MITIGATION MEASURES Based on an analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, the following mitigation measures were issued for the Determination of Non-Significance, Mitigated. 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $0.52.per square foot of new construction. The applicant will receive credit for the existing buildings that would be demolished by the proposal. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable at the time that Building Permits are issued. 2. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated at $114,000 (1,520 trips x$75 = $114,000). This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. 4. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address site plan issues from the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. 5. CONSISTENCY WITH SITE PLAN APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 4-31-33 (D.) "The Hearing Examiner and City staff shall review and act upon site plans based upon comprehensive planning considerations and the following criteria. These .. criteria are objectives of good site plans to be aimed for in development within the City of Renton. However, strict compliance with any one or more particular criterion may not be necessary or reasonable. These criteria also provide a frame of reference for the applicant in developing a site, but are not intended to be inflexible standards or to discourage creativity and innovation. The Site Plan Review criteria include, but are not limited to, the following:" HEXRPT2.DOC ' City of Renton P/B/PW Department i Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner AUTONATION USA LUA-98-151,SA-H, V-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 1, 1998 Page 5 of 9 GENERAL CRITERIA: (1) CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ITS ELEMENTS & POLICIES The City Council approved a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and rezone for the subject site on October 5, 1998. The Comprehensive Plan designation was changed from Employment Area Industrial (EAI)to Employment Area Commercial (EAC). The proposal is consistent with objectives and policies of the EAC designation. Land uses intended for the EAC designation are those that require large amounts of land and high visibility and access to large volumes of automobile traffic. (Objective LU-AA) The large auto retail use is consistent with this objective. The proposal is consistent with the following EAC policies which provide guidance regarding landscaping, access, compatibility with adjacent uses, etc. related to the site plan. Policy LU-169. Individual parcels should be encouraged to consolidate to maximize flexibility of site design and reduce access points. The proposal includes only one primary vehicle access point onto the site. Policy LU-170. Individual development projects should be encouraged to: a. minimize curb cuts and share access points, b. provide for internal circulation among adjacent parcels, c. share parking facilities, d. centralize signing, e. create a unified style of development, and f. provide landscaping and streetscaping to soften visual impacts. Policy LU-177. Special design considerations (e.g. landscape, streetscape, signage, building design) should be encouraged for areas which are designated as gateways for the city. The proposal would create a unified site appearance with coordinated signage and a site plan/design that is organized to direct customers. Landscaping along the street frontages (S. Grady Way and Talbot Road S.) would continue the consistent streetscape required for • Automall uses. Policy ED-8. Increase the retail sales tax base of the City. The proposal furthers the City's intent to expand the retail sales base. • (2) CONFORMANCE WITH EXISTING LAND USE REGULATIONS The subject site was rezoned by the City Council on October 5, 1998, from Heavy Industrial (IH) and Commercial Office (CO)to Commercial Arterial (CA). The following requirements and development standards contained in Section 4-31-10.4 Commercial Arterial (CA) of the Zoning Code [adopted June 1993] are applicable to this proposal Permitted Uses The subject site is zoned Commercial Arterial (CA). Auto sales are allowed as a primary permitted use in the CA zone. Auto service and repair are also permitted uses in the zone. HEXRPT2.DOC - City of Renton P/B/PW Depan;;,.,,. - Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner ' AUTOMATION USA LUA=98-151, SA-H, V-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 1, 1998 Page 6 of 9 Setbacks - The CA zone requires a front/street building setback of a minimum of 10 feet. The subj' site fronts along S Grady Way, Talbot Avenue S., and Benson Road S. The proposed building is setback at least 200 feet from all street frontages. No rear or side interior setbacks are required for development in the CA zone. Height- The CA zone allows a maximum building height of 50 feet. The proposal complies with the height limit. According to the building elevations, the maximum building height of the top of parapets would be 34 feet. Lot Coverage - Maximum allowable lot coverage for buildings in the CA zone is 65%. The proposal would result in building lot coverage of approximately 6% of the total lot area, well below the maximum allowed. Landscaping - The subject site was added into Automall Area B with a zoning code amendment. The City Council approved the expansion of the Automall in October 1998. The code differentiates landscape standards for auto dealerships in Automall Areas A and B from the standard landscape requirements of the CA zone. The code requires 1) a minimum 15 foot wide landscape strip along the street frontages of S. Grady Way and Talbot Road S. improved a grass berm and Red Maples planted 25 feet on center; 2) a minimum of 2.5% of the gross site area to be provided as on-site landscaping, focused at site entries, building fronts or other visually prominent locations. The proposal meets these landscape requirements. According to the applicant, approximately 130,464 square feet (15.8% of the gross site area) is provided in newly planted landscaping. The landscaping is generally concentrated around the building and site entries to meet code objectives. The Parking and Loading Ordinance requires that large parking lots over 10,000 square feet in size have a minimum of 5% interior landscaping. This requirement does not apply to at-- display area parking. According to the landscape plan, 7,464 square feet of parking landscaping is provided, equal to approximately 8.3% of the total public/employee parking area. The code requires pedestrian connections to be provided between the public entrance of buildings and the street. The proposal does not include pedestrian connections to the public sidewalks from either S. Grady Way or Talbot Road S. There are a couple of obvious connections that could be provided to accommodate pedestrians and link the sidewalks and building entries. Staff recommends that the applicant revise the site plan to provide pedestrian connections from S. Grady Way and Talbot Road S. Parking Requirements - The City's Parking and Loading Ordinance has different parking standards for the various uses/activities that would be included under the proposal. The applicant has provided a parking analysis listing the square foot area and the required number of spaces for the Outdoor retail/car display area, the indoor sales area, motor vehicle repair and service, and indoor part storage. According to the parking analysis, 115 parking stalls are . required for employee and guest parking. The site plan includes a total of 193 parking spaces meeting the code standard. Wetlands and Streams - There is an existing wetland located in the south corner of the site. • The wetland boundary generally follows the toe of the slope to the south, and the edge of the concrete drainage channel and Talbot Road S. A wetland report prepared by Pentec Environmental, Inc. identifies the .84 acre wetland as a Category 2 wetland because it is greater than 2,200 square feet in size and has minimal evidence of human-related physical alteration. Category 2 wetlands require a 50 foot wide undisturbed buffer. The existing Puget Power facility is paved directly up to a concrete drainage channel which also forms the edge of the wetland boundary. Therefore, there is no existing vegetated wetland buffer along the north edge of the wetland. The proposal would not fill or directly impact the wetland. The applicant is proposing construct a bermed wetland buffer in place of existing pavement, between the north edge of the wetland and the proposed access road. The applicant is proposing to use provisions for HEXRPT2.DOC - • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner AUTOMATION USA . - LUA-98-151, SA=H, V-H, ECF PUBUC HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 1, 1998 Page 7 of 9' wetland buffer averaging as allowed in the Wetlands Management Ordinance. The proposed buffer area would maintain a minimum 25 foot width. The code allows buffer averaging to reduce the standard buffer width to a maximum of 50% of the required width. The total wetland buffer area required would be provided on the site. The south and east edge of the wetland abuts the slope going up toward Benson Road. The applicant proposes to use this area for buffer averaging, to make up for any shortfall in the buffer area along the north edge of the wetland. The proposed buffer averaging complies with the code requirements. The• restoration of a vegetated wetland buffer area to replace the existing pavement would be an improvement over the existing conditions, providing value for wildlife habitat and wetland/stream functions. There is an existing drainage channel or stream, an unnamed tributary to Rolling Hills Creek, that flows across the east and south sides of the site in an open concrete channel, 4 feet wide by 3 feet deep. The course of the stream is described in the environmental review report. According to the wetland report prepared by Pentec Environmental, Inc. for the proposal, no fish were observed in the stream during their investigation. No electrofishing was conducted and it is uncertain whether there is fish use (salmonids) downstream from the site. The existing Puget Power facility is paved right up to the concrete channel, there is no existing vegetated buffer. The proposal would not directly impact the stream, and the applicant proposes to leave the concrete channel intact. The applicant is proposing to remove the existing asphalt and compacted gravel surfacing and plant a stream/wetland • buffer area with a minimum width of 19 feet. The proposed stream buffer planting consists of native evergreen and deciduous trees and shrubs planted at a high density (mass planting). The native plantings would provide for wildlife habitat, assist in reducing the temperature of water in the creek, and discourage the public from entering the stream area. The proposal would improve the existing environmental conditions on the site. Staff has determined that code requirements for a 25 foot stream buffer are not applicable • because the buffer requirements are for tree cutting and groundcover removal which does not apply to the removal of impervious surfaces. (3) MITIGATION OF IMPACTS TO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND USES; The subject site is bordered on the east and south by Interstate 405 (1-405). There are steep vegetated embankments which go up from the site to 1-405, giving the appearance of a green perimeter. This isolates the site on two sides from adjacent land uses. To the north is the Renton City Hall and office uses exist to the west. The proposed building is located in the center of the site, surrounded by large expanses of auto display and customer/employee parking. Perimeter landscaping is proposed along street frontages. The site plan layout would not impact use of surrounding properties. The operation of the auto sales facility would not create adverse impacts on surrounding properties and uses. • (4) MITIGATION OF IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN TO THE SITE; The proposal would redevelop the Puget Sound Energy site which is presently used for the storage/maintenance of electrical and gas equipment. Most of the site is covered with impervious surfaces. Puget Sound Energy has conducted soil remediation activities to remove contaminants on the site in preparation of redevelopment. The proposal would not affect significant natural features on the site. The steep vegetated slopes along the east part of the property below Benson Road would be left undisturbed. The proposal also avoids impacts to the wetland and stream on the site. A vegetated stream/ wetland buffer would be densely planted with native plants to replace existing asphalt and gravel, an improvement over existing conditions on the site. The proposal would also add more landscape area than presently exists on the site. HEXRPT2.DOC • • City of Renton P1iPW Depa:::.....t Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner AUTONATION USA LUA-98-151,SA-H, V-H, ECF PUBUC HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 1, 1998 Page 8 of 9. (5) CONSERVATION.OF AREA-WIDE PROPERTY VALUES; The proposed redevelopment is expected to improve area-wide property values. The si _ would be converted from an industrial site used for the storage/maintenance of electrical and gas equipment to an auto retail use. (6) SAFETY AND EFFICIENCY OF VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN - CIRCULATION; The primary access drive onto the site would be off Talbot Road, with a gated emergency service driveway on South Grady Way. The number of access points onto the site are limited for security purposes. A traffic report was prepared by Transportation Planning & Engineering, Inc. The report concludes that the level of service at the intersections of Grady Way and Talbot Rd. S and Grady Way and Rainier Ave. S. would not be significantly reduced as a result of this project. The project would not adversely impact surrounding streets and there are no planned or programmed City or State roadway projects that require contributions. Sight distances at the main driveway access off Talbot Road S. are acceptable and the proposed driveway location would not have significant impacts to traffic along Talbot Road S. The proposal would result in an increase in traffic trips over the existing use of the site and therefore would be subject to the City's Transportation Mitigation Fee which was imposed as a SEPA mitigation measure. As discussed in a previous section, the applicant has not provided a pedestrian connection from sidewalks along street frontages to the building entry. Staff has recommended a site plan condition for the applicant to revise plans and provide the required pedestrian connection. Pedestrian circulation internal to the site appears adequate. (7) PROVISION OF ADEQUATE LIGHT AND AIR; The proposed building is situated in the center of the site and there would be adequate light and air to the building. The proposal would not impact light and air to adjacent properties. (8) NOISE, ODORS AND OTHER HARMFUL OR UNHEALTHY CONDITIONS; Noise, dust and odors would result with construction of the project. These impacts would be mitigated through measures described in the Construction Mitigation Plan and with best management practices. The operation of the auto sales facility is not expected to create harmful or unhealthy conditions. (9) AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED USE; AND There are adequate utilities and roads available to serve the proposed development. Police and Fire have indicated that adequate resources exist to serve the auto sales facility. (10) PREVENTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD DETERIORATION AND BLIGHT. The proposal would serve to prevent neighborhood deterioration and blight by redeveloping and improving an existing industrial site to commercial use. The proposed retail use wou, draw more intensive commercial activity into the area. HEXRPT2.DOC • , City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner • AUTONATION USA LUA-98-151, SA-H, V-H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 1, 1998 Page 9 of 9 H. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the site plan for Autonation USA File No. LUA-98-051, ECF, SA-H, SA-V subject to the following conditions: (1) Compliance with ERC Mitigation Measures: The applicant is required to comply with the Mitigation Measures which were required by the Environmental Review Committee Threshold Determination, prior to the issuance of a building permit. (2) The applicant shall revise the site plan to provide direct pedestrian connections from the sidewalks along S. Grady Way and Talbot Road S. to the building entries. The revised site plan shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division prior to issuance of building permits. EXPIRATION PERIODS: Site Plan Approvals (SA): Two (2)years from the final approval (signature) date. • • HEXRPT2.DOC • • • DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE • (MITIGATED). • MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-98-151,SA-H,V-H,ECF APPLICANT: Autonation USA Corp • PROJECT NAME: Autonation USA DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for an auto sales facility consisting of a 53,200 sq. ft. showroom/ service building, retail display parking for 506 vehicles, 129 parking stalls for vehicle service/storage, and 193 parking stalls for guests and employees. Three existing buildings on the site presently used by Puget Sound Energy would be demolished. The primary access drive onto the site would be off Talbot Road South,with a gated emergency service driveway on South Grady Way. There is a .84 acre Category 2 wetland in the southeast corner of the site which would not be directly impacted by the proposal. A stream flows through a concrete channel on the east part of the site. The proposal includes a variance request to construct the primary access drive encroaching into the required 25 foot stream buffer. Approximately .1.30 acres of the subject site will be sold to the City of Renton for additional City Hall parking. • LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 915 S. Grady Way MITIGATION MEASURES: • • 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction. The applicant will receive credit for the existing buildings that would be demolished by the proposal. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable at the time that Building Permits are issued. 2. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated $114,000 (1,520 trips x$75=$114,000). This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. • . DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE • (MITIGATED) • ADVISORY NOTES . . • APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-98-151,SA-H,V-H,ECF APPLICANT: Autonation USA Corp • PROJECT NAME: Autonation USA • DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for an auto sales facility consisting of a 53,200 sq. ft. • showroom/ service building, retail display parking for 506 vehicles, 129 parking stalls for vehicle service/storage, and 193 parking stalls for guests and employees. Three existing buildings on the site presently used by Puget Sound Energy would be demolished. The primary access drive onto the site would be off Talbot Road South,with a gated emergency service driveway on South Grady Way. There is a .84 acre Category 2 wetland in the southeast corner of the site which would not be directly impacted by the proposal. A stream flows through a concrete channel on the east part of the site. The proposal includes a variance request to construct the primary access drive encroaching into the required 25 foot stream buffer. Approximately 1.30 acres of the subject site will be sold to the City of Renton for additional City Hall parking. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: .915 S. Grady Way Advisory Notes to Applicant: ..The following notes are supplemental information provided. in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. BUILDING Soils report states that additional liquefaction analysis'is needed. Geopiers are subject to additional review. Use the 1997 UBC for use, area and occupancy separations. Signs are subject to Renton sign code. FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flow is 3,250 GPM based on Type 5N construction. One fire hydrant is required within 150 feet of the building and 3 additional hydrants within 300 feet of the building, based on required fire flow. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for sprinkler and fire alarm systems installation. • 3. Provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are to be used or stored on site. 4. All required fire access roadways are required to be a minimum of 20 feet wide unobstructed. The inside radius is 25 feet and the outside radius is 45 feet. All required fire lanes shall be marked . per City Ordinance. PLAN REVIEW Water 1. There is an existing 24"water main adjacent to the site in Talbot Road S, an 18"water main in S Grady Way, and a 16"water main in Benson Road S. There are also several 8" and 6"water mains and four hydrants located on the site itself. 2. No additional water main extensions will be required for this project. 3. The redevelopment credit for this site eliminates the requirement for payment of system development charges for water and sewer.• . •1. .There is a drainage system from Renton Hill to the•east which crosses under 1-405 and Benson • and crosses the southerly portion of the site in a combined culvert/ditch system. This system • • • Autonation USA • •LUA-98-151,SA-H,V-H,ECF , • Advisory Notes (Continued) - • • • • • discharges into a developed pipe system In Talbot Rd S. There are also developed pipe drainage systems in S Grady Way and Talbot Road S adjacent to the site. 2. A conceptual drainage plan and drainage report has been prepared and submitted with the site plan application for this project. The conceptual drainage plan includes provisions for water quality treatment in compliance with the requirements of the KCSWM. No detention is required for this proposal, since there is no increase in the runoff rate anticipated from this site redevelopment. The conceptual drainage plan is approved as submitted. - 3. Since there is no net increase in impervious surface on this site as part of the development proposal,there will be no system development charge for surface water required for this project. Wastewater • 1. Service to this site is provided by an 18" sewer main which runs across the southerly portion of the site from the east and into the system in Talbot Road S which then runs south before turning west across the Renton Village site connecting to the METRO Interceptor at Rainier and Grady. 2. No additional sewer main extensions will be required for this project. • 3. The redevelopment credit for this site eliminates the requirement for payment of system development charges for water and sewer. Transportation 1. Talbot Rd S and S Grady Way are fully improved with curb, gutters, sidewalks and street lighting adjacent to this project site. Benson Rd S is a paved two lane arterial, with gravel'shoulders and no curbs or sidewalks adjacent to this.project site. No vehicular or pedestrian access is proposed to the site from 'Benson Rd S, due to inaccessibility across the steep slope, the wetland area and the ditch/stream system. 2. City Code requires a project of this size to abut fully improved.streets. This would require the improvement of Benson Rd S adjacent to the'site with curb, gutter and sidewalks for the entire frontage of the site. A request for waiver of this requirement has been made to the Board of Public Works. 3. A traffic report has been prepared for this project and included with the application. The traffic report has been prepared using methodology acceptable to the City. The report concludes that the level of service at the intersections of Grady Way and Talbot Rd and Grady Way and Rainier Ave S will not be significantly reduced as a result of this project. The report also concludes that the proposed driveway location is acceptable and will not have significant impacts to traffic along Talbot Rd S. Staff concurs with the conclusions of.the traffic study. General All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a registered Civil Engineer. The construction permit application must include a itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,00 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over - $200,000. Half of this fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. PLANNING Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. PARKS All landscaped areas outside the property line are to be maintained by the property owner. Red Maples are planted directly in powerline right-of-way and under overhead lines in 2 locations along Grady Way and Talbot Road.-Trees grow to 35 foot height. Recommend coordination with power company to avoid • conflict and improper pruning. C. USE RESTRICTION::. nue S.W. .,. ,he west, S.W. 10th Street on Notwithstanding any other provisions of this the north,and Lind Avenue S.W.on the east; Code, no use may be made of land within any air- • port approach zone or airport turning zone in such That area along the north side of S.W.Grady a manner as to create electrical interference with Way between Lind Avenue to the west and radio communication between the airport and air- Rainier Avenue S. on the east. Beginning at craft, making it difficult for fliers to distinguish be- a point approximately four hundred feet tween airport lights and others, result in glare in (400') north of S.W. Grady Way along the - the eyes of fliers using the airport,impair visibility east side of Lind Ayenue S.W. on the west, : in the vicinity thereof, or otherwise endanger the then east for a distance of approximately landing, taking off, or maneuvering of aircraft. three hundred twenty five feet(325'), then • south to a point approximately one hundred D: HAZARD MARKING AND LIGHTING: eighty feet (180') north of S.W. Grady Way, • Any permit or variance granted as provided in this then east from this point parallel to S.W. Section and affecting the airport approach,transi- Grady Way to a point approximately ninety . tion or turning zone shall be so conditioned as to feet (90') west of Rainier Avenue S.,then . require the owner of the structure or tree in ques- north from this point approximately sixty feet • tion to permit the City, at its own expense, to in- (60'),then west approximately fifty feet(50'), stall,operate and maintain thereon such markers and then north approximately two hundred fif- and lights as may be necessary to give adequate teen feet (215') and then east approximately notice to aircraft of the presence of such airport one hundred sixty feet (160') to Rainier Ave- hazard. (Ord. 1542, 4-17-1956) nue S. on the east; That area north of South 7th Street and west 4-3-030 AQUIFER PROTECTION of Hardie Avenue generally described as the REGULATIONS: (Reserved) area beginning at the northwest corner of South 7th Street and Hardie Avenue S. and then proceeding west approximately four 4-3-040 AUTO MALL IMPROVEMENT hundred twenty five feet (425'), then north DISTRICT REGULATIONS: approximately four hundred fifty feet(450')to the southern edge of the Burlington Northern A. PURPOSE: Railroad right-of-way, then east along the These regulations are intended to help create a railroad ROW approximately two hundred regional auto mall that has a cohesive appear- thirty five feet (235') to Hardie Avenue and ance for improved retail activity. then south along Hardie Avenue to the begin- ning point; B. APPLICABILITY: That area north of South 7th Street between • 1. Auto Mall Area A:That area bounded by Hardie Avenue on the west, the Burlington Grady Way S. on the north, Rainier Avenue Northern Railroad right-of-way on the north, S. (SR-167) on the east, 1-4,05 on the south, and Rainier Avenue on the east; and Raymond Avenue S. on the west. That area north of South 7th Street between 2. Auto Mall Area B: That area along the Rainier Avenue S.on the west, a line approx • - south side of S.W. Grady Way west of Ray- imately one hundred ninety feet (190') north mond Avenue S. between S.W. Grady Way of and parallel to South 7th Street on the. on the north, Raymond Avenue S. on the north, and Shattuck Avenue S. on the east; east. a north/south line approximately four The triangular area on the south side of South hundred feet(400')east of Raymond Avenue 7th Street between Hardie Avenue on the S.W. on the west, and S.W. Grady Way on west and Rainier Avenue on the east; the north: The larger area north of S. Grady Way be- That area along the north side of S.W. Grady tween Rainier Avenue on the west and Shat- Way west of Lind Avenue S. bounded by S.W. Grady Way on the south, Powell Ave- tuck Avenue S. on the east between South 3 - 5 (Revised 1/99) 4-3-040B 7th Street on the north and S. Grady Way on the south; • . That area north of S. Grady Way between Shattuck Avenue S.on the west,the northern edge of the former railroad right-of-way ap- proximately one hundred fifty feet(150') north of S. Grady Way, and Talbot Road/ Smithers Avenue S. on the east; That area along the south side of S. Grady Way between SR-167/Rainier Avenue S. on the west and a north/south line approximately one thousand six hundred thirty feet(1,630') east of SR-167 on the east,S. Grady Way on the north, and on the southwest along S. Renton Village Place approximately one hun- dred seventy five feet (175')to the 1998 zon- ing boundary between the CA Zone and the CO Zone on the south; and That area along the south side of S. Grady Way east of Talbot Road bounded by Talbot Road on•the west, S. Grady Way on the northwest, Renton City Hall on the north/ northeast, Benson Road S. on the east/ southeast, and the 1-405 right-of-way on the south. (Revised 1/99) 3 - 6 C. USES PERMITTED AUTO MALL IMPROVEMENT DISTinic;r: • • The following use provisions take precedence over the underlying zoning: •• USES ALLOWED IN AREA A USES ALLOWED IN AREA B Only the following uses are permitted within Auto Mall Area A Within the CA Zone:Auto,motorcycle,snowmobile,lawn and All uses permitted by the underlying zoning garden equipment, and passenger truck sales; • • • Secondary uses including: Licensing bureaus, car rentals, public parking, and other uses determined by the Zoning Administrator to directly support dealerships; Within the IM Zone:Auto, motorcycle, snowmobile, lawn and garden equipment, passenger truck sales, and existing office; Secondary uses including: Licensing bureaus,car rentals, public parking,off-site parking consistent with RMC 4-14-4C3 and other uses determined by the Zoning Administrator to directly support dealerships. D. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR USES LOCATED WITHIN AUTO MALL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS— AREAS A AND B: All permitted uses in Area A and all auto sales and related uses in Area B of the Auto Mall Improvement District shall comply with the following development standards: ALL USES IN AREA A AND NON-DEALERSHIPS AND DEALERSHIPS AND RELATED USES IN AREA B RELATED USES IN AREA B SERVICE AREA Service areas shall not face public Service areas shall not face public ORIENTATION street frontage. street frontage. . LANDSCAPING— A 15-foot-wide landscape strip along Pursuant to landscaping requirements STREET FRONTAGE these street frontages. This frontage listed in chapter 4-2 RMC LANDSCAPING requirement is in lieu of the frontage (requirements for the underlying zone) REQUIREMENTS requirement listed for the zone in and chapter 4-4 RMC. for lots which abut Lind chapter 4-2 RMC. Avenue S.W., S.W. Unimproved portions of the right-of-way Grady Way, Talbot may be used in combination with Road S. (SR 515) and abutting private property to meet the Rainier Avenue S. required 15-foot landscape strip width. The landscaping shall include a minimum 30-inch high berm and red maples (Acer rubrum) planted 25 feet on center. LANDSCAPING— 2.5% of the gross site area shall be Pursuant to landscaping requirements MINIMUM AMOUNT provided as on-site landscaping. listed in chapter 4-2 RMC AND LOCATION Landscaping shall be consolidated and (requirements for the underlying zone) located at site entries, building fronts, and chapter 4-4 RMC. or other visually prominent locations as approved through the site plan review process. 3 - 7 (Revised 1/99) 4-3-040D • ALL USES IN AREA A AND • DEALERSHIPS AND NON-DEALERSHIPS AND • RELATED USES IN AREA B RELATED USES IN AREA B WHEEL STOPS If frontage landscaping is relocated, If frontage landscaping is relocated, then permanent wheel stops or then permanent wheel stops or continuous curbs must be installed a continuous curbs must be installed a • minimum of 2.5 feet from sidewalks to minimum of 2.5 feet from sidewalks to prevent bumper overhang of sidewalks. prevent bumper overhang of sidewalks. Where these requirements differ from Where these requirements differ from the requirements of the parking, the requirements of the parking, loading and driveway regulations of loading and driveway regulations of chapter 4-4 RMC,these requirements chapter 4-4 RMC,these requirements shall govern. shall govern. CUSTOMER Customer parking shall be designated Customer parking shall be designated PARKING and striped near entry drives and visible and striped near entry drives and visible from public streets. Where possible, from public streets. Where possible, customer parking shall be combined customer parking shall be combined with adjacent dealership customer with adjacent dealership customer parking and shared access. Where parking and shared access. Where these requirements differ from the these requirements differ from the requirements of the parking, loading requirements of the parking, loading and driveway regulations of chapter 4-4 and driveway regulations of chapter 4-4 RMC, these requirements shall govern. RMC,these requirements shall govern. AUTO MALL Once completed,all development shall Once completed, all development shall RIGHT-OF-WAY coordinate with a right-of-way coordinate with a right-of-way IMPROVEMENT PLAN improvement plan. A right-of-way improvement plan. A right-of-way COORDINATION improvement plan shall be completed improvement plan shall be completed by the City in coordination with adjacent by the City in coordination with adjacent property owners, and shall address property owners, and shall address gateways, signage, landscaping, and gateways, signage, landscaping, and shared access. shared access. AUTO MALL All development shall coordinate with All development shall coordinate with IMPROVEMENT PLAN the Auto Mall Improvement Plan the Auto Mall Improvement Plan COMPLIANCE adopted by Resolution No. 3182. The adopted by Resolution No. 3182. The plan addresses potential street plan addresses potential street vacations, right-of-way improvements, vacations, right-of-way improvements, area gateways, signage, landscaping, area gateways, signage, landscaping, circulation, and shared access. circulation, and shared access. MODIFICATIONS Where full compliance with these provisions would create a hardship for existing uses undergoing major modifications,the Zoning Administrator may modify them. Hardship for existing uses may result from existing lot coverage, existing siting of buildings. etc.. which preclude full compliance. • (Revised 1/99) 3 - 8 . 4-3-050B E. POTENTIAL WAIVER OF STREET programs and resources to the end that the State VACATION FEES FOR DEALERSHIPS and its citizens may: • LOCATED WITHIN AREA A: All street vacation fees and compensation for the 1. Fulfill the responsibilities of each genera- right-of-way may be waived by Council for devel- tion as trustees of the environment for suc- oping properties in Area A, provided: ceeding generations; 1. The properties are designated to be va- 2. Assure for all people of Washington safe, cated on the Auto Mall Improvement Plan healthful, productive and aesthetically and Map, culturally pleasing surroundings; 2. The application for street vacation con- 3. Attain the widest range of beneficial uses forms to RMC 9-14-11, Administrative Proce- of the environment without degradation, risk dure for Right-of Way Vacations, and to health or safety, or other undesirable and unintended consequences; 3. The uses proposed conform to subsec- tion C of this Section. (Amd. Ord. 4749, 10- 4. Preserve important historic, cultural and 19-1998) natural aspects of our national heritage; 5. Maintain, wherever possible, an environ- 4-3-050 ENVIRONMENTALLY • • ment which supports diversity and variety of SENSITIVE AREAS: individual choice; A. PURPOSE OF REGULATIONS: 6. Achieve a balance between population The City, recognizing that man depends on his bi- and resource use which will permit high stan- ological and physical surroundings for food, shel- ter and other needs, and for cultural enrichment amenities; and as well, and recognizing further the profound im- pact of man's activity on the interrelations of all 7. Enhance the quality of renewable re- components of the natural environment, particu- larly the profound influences of population able recycling of depletable resources. growth, high density urbanization, industrial ex The City recognizes that each person has a pansions, resource utilization and exploitation fundamental and inalienable right to a health- and new and expanding technological advances, ful environment and that each person has a and recognizing further the critical importance of responsibility to contribute to the preservation restoring and maintaining environmental quality and enhancement of the environment. to the overall welfare and development of man, • declares that it is the continuing policy of the City, B. MAPS DEPICTING in cooperation with Federal, State and other local governments and in cooperation with other con ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS cerned public and private organizations,to use all AND SENSITIVE AREA DESIGNATION: practicable means and measures in a manner calculated to foster and promote the general wel- 1. Maps Adopted by Reference: The • fare. to create and maintain conditions under map(s) under Ordinance No.3891 designate which man and nature can exist in productive har- the location of environmentally sensitive ar- mony, and fulfill the social, economic and other eas within the City and are adopted by refer-, requirements of present and future generations of ence.These include greenbelts designated in Washington citizens. the Comprehensive Plan, conservancy and. natural environments of the Shoreline Master In order to carry out the policy set forth in this Sec- Program and the one hundred (100).year tion,it is the continuing'responsibility of the City to floodway mapped under the Federal Flood use all practicable means, consistent with other Insurance Program. (Ord. 3891, 2-25-1985) essential considerations of State and City poli- cies, to improve and coordinate plans, functions, 2. Sensitive Areas Designated: Wetlands as mapped and identified in the City Critical 3 - 8.1 (Revised 1/99) �GHAv� CIVIL ENGINEERING,LAND PLANNING,SURVEYING,ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES no` ► November 5, 1999 SSG 411%rC Mot" C`'c (�f �TV C��/f 1tt��M1i7 11• ,�, Peter Rosen ,.� t OF i City of Renton Development Services Department N(111 () 1yyy 1055 South Grady Way G Renton,WA 98055 RGE1VED RE: Site Plan Approval/SEPA/Variance for the Home Depot Project Grady Way and Talbot Road,Renton,Washington Our Job No. 6254 Dear Peter: On behalf of Home Depot U.S.A.,Inc.,we are pleased to submit the complete application for site plan approval, variance, and SEPA environmental review for the proposed Home Depot facility in Renton,Washington. As required by the City of Renton,we are submitting the following application materials: 1. Master Application(1 original,plus 11 copies). 2. SEPA Environmental Checklist(12 copies). 3. Title Report(3 copies). 4. Mailing labels(2 sets of self-adhesive mailing labels)for all property owners within 300 feet of the subject property boundaries. 5. List of surrounding property owners (2 copies). This list is signed and notarized on the"List of Surrounding Property Owners"form. 6. One check made payable to the City of Renton to cover site plan review, variance, SEPA environmental review,and first class postage for the mailing labels. 7. Pre-Application Meeting Summary(5 copies). 8. Project Narrative(12 copies). 9. Construction Mitigation Description(5 copies). 10. Neighborhood Detail Map (12 copies). 11. Site Plan(12 copies). 12. Architectural Elevations (12 copies). 13. Grading and Storm Drainage Plan(12 copies). 14. Preliminary Utilities Plan(5 copies). 15. Technical Information Report(4 copies). 16. Geotechnical Engineering Report by GeoEngineers,Inc.,dated October 15, 1999(5 copies). 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT,WA 98032 (425)251-6222 (425)251-8782 FAX www.barghausen.com Peter Rosen City of Renton Development'Services Department -2- November 5, 1999 17. Wetland Delineation Report by NRC (Natural Resource Consulting), dated September 1999, (12 copies). 18. Landscape Plan by Weisman Design Group (5 sets of the plan set). 19. Floor Plans(5 copies). 20. Tree Cutting/Land Clearing(tree inventory)Plan(4 copies). 21. Traffic Impact Analysis by The Transpo Group,Inc. (5 copies). 22. Plan reductions(8 1/2 by 11-inch PMT reduction)of the Architectural Elevations,Landscape Plan, Utility Plan, Site Plan, and Neighborhood Detail Map. 23. Colored display maps and colored architectural rending by Greenberg Farrow Architecture,Inc. 24. Variance request including project narrative, and justification for variance (10 copies) for the alteration(clearing/grading)of a small area with slopes over 40 percent. Please notify me of your technical completeness schedule and anticipated dates for the Environmental Review Committee meeting and Hearing Examiner public hearing. Shouldyouhave any questions or comments regarding the enclosed documents,please contact me at this office. Sincerely, Bruce K. Creager,AI Director of P1 • ervices BKC/ph/ps 6954C.012 enc: As Noted cc: Jim Lyon,Home Depot U.S.A.,Inc. (w/enc) Brian)Esplen,Home Depot U.S.A. Inc. Michael Okuma,Greenberg Farrow Architecture,Inc. (w/enc) Bob Betts,Robert S. Betts,Inc. (w/enc) Glenn Amster,Lane,Powell, Spears,Lubersky(w/enc) Jeff Schramm,The Transpo Group,Inc. (w/enc) Bob Boyd,Puget Western,Inc. Jay S:, Grubb,Barghausen Consulting Engineers,Inc. (w/enc) **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted; 11/05/99 14:16 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9905580 Amount: 2, 750. 00 11/05/99 14 : 15 Payment Method: CHECK Notation; #36119 .aARGHAUSE Init: LN Project #• LUA99-157 Type; QUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 172305-9072 Site Addres : 915 S GRADY WY Tot41 Fees; 2, 756.93 This Payment 2, 750 . 00 Total ALL Pmts: 2, 756 .93 $41.ice: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 .345 . 81. 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 000 . 345 . 81. 00 . 0017 Site Plan Approval 2, 000 . 00 000 .345 . 81. 00i0019 Variance Fees 250 . 00 1 ******************************************t********************* City of Renton WA Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9905581 Amount; 6 ,93 11/05/99 14 : 16 Payment Method: CHECK Notation; #a681_5 pARGHAUSE Init: LN Project #: LUA99-157 Type; LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 172305-9072 Site Address: 915 S GRADY WY Total. Fees: 2, 756.93 This Payment ' 6 .93 Total A144 Pmts: 2, 756 .93 Ealance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 05 .519 .90 .42 . 1 Postage 6 .93 1 • LIVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE . APPLICATIONS D:< : €M I :.I :>LAND.USE<P.ERMIT><SUBM.ITTAL >< > WAIYE ..... OD FIE ... ............................. ..............::::.�::........ COM ::: ::> ' : RE Calculations, Survey, l7�rairi:a e;:Confi:ol;Pl...nz:..:::::..::......::..:: ::......:.:::...:::.:. :.:.:.:::::.::::::::: ..... ..:.:...............:::::..:::. ..::::.::::::.:.:.:::...:.::.::.::...:::.:::::::::::.:::.�:::::.:::::.::::.::;:.;::::..:::::::: Drainage Report'z Elevafiorsarchit.. . . ..(a.Noa.... .... Elevations, Grading 2 Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) 4 Floor Plans 3AND4 Grading Plan, Conceptual 2 King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site 4 ...;':: ............................................... ................... Legal Description 4 Mailing Labels for Property Owners 4 Map:of:Existin .'.Si. lte Condn itio s.4. Master Application Form 4 Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis 4 Plan: eductionsrPMT .. .-.. Postage 4 . Public Works Approval:Letters Title Report or Plat Certificate 4 DEVELOPMENT PLANN Topography.;Ma . 5 :contours s .. • Traffic Study z NOV 0 199 ree Cutti Ne etation Clearin •Plan.4 T n 9 . Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 Wetlands:Delineation:Ma 4 Wetlands Planting Plan 4 Wetlands Study4 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: -74)7741.- � � 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section - - DATE: 4. Development.Planning Section _ h:\division.s\develop.ser\dev.plan.ing\waiver.xls - • criteria for approving a modification request are listed in RMC Section 4-9-250D. There is no fee for this type of modification request. Stall Sizes/Compact Spaces: The standard stall size permitted within the City is 9' by 20' with 24 feet of backout room. Compact stalls may be as small as 8.5' by 16'. Of the total spaces required, 30% of these may be compact. The site plan indicates the applicant is proposing less than the 30% maximum permitted by the parking regulations. Section 4-4-080F8c explains provisions that may also permit a reduced stall length. The preliminary plan does not provide dimensions, so I was unable to determine compliance with the stall size or aisle requirements. Loading Space: It does not appear that the required loading space has been indicated on the plans yet. Since the proposed retail use(s);I,011 "require deliveries to it or shipments from it of people and merchandise", in addition to the required parking "adequate permanent off-street loading space shall {also} be provided". See RMC 4-4-080J1. Presumably, the building will have dock doors and these require a certain amount of clear area in front of each door (100 feet for dock high doors, 40 feet for ground level loading doors). Since the plans did not provide this level of detail, I was unable to determine compliance with the loading regulations. RMC Section 4-4-080J further explains these provisions. Setbacks: The proposed site plan indicates that the closest point of the structure is approximately 220 feet from the South Grady Way property line and about 80 feet from the Benson Road South property line. The CA Zone requires a 10-fo;ot landscaped setback from theses property lines. No other setbacks are required by the CA Zone or the Automall Area B overlay in this instance. Landscaping and Pedestrian Connection Requirements: In addition to the 10-foot landscaping strip required along Grady Way, an additional 5% of the . interior of the parking lot is required to be landscaped. •The landscaping area used to comply with this requirement on the previous site plan has been eliminated in the revised plan. The applicant will need to provide an analysis and site plan indicating compliance with the 5% interior-landscaping minimum. All required on-site landscaping must be sprinklered. Section 4-2-120 regarding "pedestrian access" requires provision of "direct, clear and spate pedestrian walks from sidewalks to building entries and internally from buildings to adjacent retail properties". The formal site plan submittal should indicate the location, width and materials for the proposed pedestrian walks. • Height: The maximum permissible building height in the in the CA Zone is 50 feet. • Lot Coverage: The maximum lot coverage for the CA Zone is 65% of the total site area for projects not providing structured parking. The applicant will be required to provide an analysis of lot coverage on the face of the formal site plan submitted as part of the Site Plan Approval/Environmental Review application. Signage: No signage information is provided as part of this preliminary proposal. The City Sign Regulations permit 20 percent of each building façade to be used for wall .signage. In addition, the Grady Way Street frontage entitles the development to a free standing, roof or projecting sign not exceeding 150 square feet in area (300 sq. ft. total for all faces). The maximum freestanding sign height is 40 feet. Once a sign proposal is available, I would be happy to review it for code compliance. Outdoor Storage: Any outdoor storage must be screened pursuant to Section 4-2-120 A. Trash Enclosures: The code mandates that refuse containers be located outside of required setback areas. Trash enclosures must be screened pursuant to RMC 4-4-09007. We recommend that you obtain Rainier Waste Management's approval of your proposed dumpster location(s) prior to submitting your site plan application package. The site plan ?:)plication must indicate all proposed dumpster locations and elevation drawl;igs indicating the proposed method of screening. Sensitive Areas: While the site is not indicated as sensitive on any City's the Cit 's Sensitive Areas maps, wetlands and a stream are known to be located on or near the proposed development site. If these areas are included within the project site, more detailed stream information and a wetland delineation and report will be required. A Geotechnical Report will also be required due to soil /liquifaction potential. • Mitigation Fees and Other Development Related Fees: A listing of all the City's Development related fees is attached. Phone numbers are included for the Divisions/Departments.responsible for the various fees. I Comments by: Laureen Nicolay (425) 430-7294 \ -77 7 dA G .ai /h 11"C52 /47 lG JLre "eze.,kleS , • . • . • 9812109014 LOT LIN E ADJUSTMENT ' A 4 OF SECTION 17,THE NE 1/4 OF S ECTION 9, ANDON OF THE SW /THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 20 ALL IN TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON • I t� I +� I€ i' A. / I ,-• • v , ; / 'Ts. / tE BASED ON CITY ` AO rd j } IOUI FIRST AMERICAN 1� 686-9K, DATED 1I _ 1•' dC,y. / EN CONSULTING R IS BGMAUSEN ` M VG THE SURVEYED d e r THE REFERENCED w• INC. I . ENGINEERS. NC. 4:LE'S RON TO ENGINEERS. INC. tr,�Vy ; %ION WAS USED TO I d • HE CONTROLLING I era ;, I EXCEEDED THOSEMIN H15 HASTSURVEY�EEN • f i • 1 i e I i,pe�t .'fit.' J_ . I Z • T,IAM L. �� �qss Q•GHq�0 1821 5 72ND AVENUE SOUTH DRAWN B7 nD`' PCY! �( "" P ro' (! KENT, WA 98032 wrz t0/?i/9Al suk. • • December 14, 1998 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: ! Robert Dwors Autonation USA Corp. • Autonation USA File No.: LUA-98-151,SA-H,V-H LOCATION: 915 S Grady Way SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To construct auto sales facility consisting of 53,200 square foot showroom/service building, 506 vehicle display parking, 129 vehicle service/storage parking and 193 customer/employee parking SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on November 24, 1998. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area;the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the December 1, 1998 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. • The hearing opened on Tuesday, December 1, 1998,at 9:05 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. • The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Vicinity map application, proof of posting, proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: Site plan Exhibit No.4: Landscape plan • ' Exhibit No. 5: Building elevations Exhibit No. 6: Stream buffer/wetland drawing Robert Dwors • Autonation USA Corp. Autonation USA File No.: LUA-98-151,SA-H,V-H December 14, 1998 Page 2 The hearing opened,with a presentation of the staff report by PETER ROSEN,Project Manager,Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way,Renton, Washington 98055. The applicant seeks site plan approval and approval of a variance to construct an auto sales facility consisting of a 53,200 square feet showroon/service building,retail display parking for 506 vehicles, 129 parking stalls for vehicle service/storage area and 193 parking stalls for customers and employees. The entire site is approximately 20.19 acres. The present owner has agreed to sell 1.19 acres on the north part of the site to the City of Renton for City Hall parking improvements. The site is currently owned and used by Puget Sound Energy for storage and. maintenance of electrical and gas equipment. The three existing buildings on site would be demolished. Soil • remediation has been done to the site regarding underground tanks. The primary access into the proposed site would be off Talbot Road with an emergency access off South Grady Way which would be gated. There is a .84 acre Category II wetland at the southeast corner of the site. The eastern portion of the wetland slopes up to Benson Road. There is a concrete drainage channel on the west edge of the wetland that is a tributary of Rolling Hills Creek. The code requires a 25 foot buffer width from the high water mark of creeks. The applicant initially requested a variance as they were providing 19 feet instead of the 25 foot required buffer along the western edge of the stream channel where an access road intruded at various points. After reviewing the matter, it was concluded that no variance was required because of the existing conditions of asphalt and compacted gravel that border the drainage channel,thus requiring no land clearing. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC) issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with fire and traffic mitigation fees imposed. The City Council approved a Comprehensive Plan (CP)amendment and rezone for this site on October 5, 1998,changing it from Employment Area-Industrial to Employment Area- Commercial,with the rezone from Heavy Industrial and Commercial Office to Commercial Arterial (CA)zoning. The proposal is consistent with the objectives and policies of the CP designation which is intended for land uses that require high visibility and access to large volumes of automobile traffic. The proposal conforms to the site rezone as automobile sales are a permitted use in the CA zone. Automobile service and repair are also permitted uses. This application meets all setback requirements as the building is located in the center of the site surrounded with large areas of parking. It also meets building height and lot coverage requirements. This site is now in the Automall Area B and the landscape standards require a 15 foot • wide landscape perimeter strip along the street frontages,and a minimum 2.5 percent of the gross site area to be provided as onsite landscaping to be focused around building entries and site entries. Applicant is providing approximately 15.8 percent of the gross site area in landscaping,not including the wetland and the embankment up to Benson Road. The existing trees along Talbot Road will be removed. Also included is 7,464 square feet of parking lot landscaping. The code also requires pedestrian connections from street frontages to building entries. The proposal does not include these and staff is recommending that the site plan be revised to accommodate pedestrian connections from South Grady Way and Talbot Road. This proposal will not directly impact the existing Category II wetland. In terms of the buffer,the applicant is providing 25 feet of buffer on the west edge of the wetland in a planted berm. This would separate the drainage channel and the wetland from the access road. Buffer averaging is allowed and the applicant has proposed to make up for the shortfall to the east of the wetland. The concrete drainage channel has water in it year round, but no fish have been observed in it. The site is bounded on the east and south by Interstate 405 with a steep vegetated embankment to Benson Road to the east. To the north is Renton City Hall and office uses are located to the west. The site plan layout is not expected to have an impact on surrounding properties nor would the operation of the facility create adverse Robert Dwors AutonationUS'A Corp. Autonation USA File No.: LUA-98-151,SA-H,V-H December 14, 1998 Page 3 impacts on surrounding property or uses. The primary access drive has been located as far to the south on Talbot as possible so as not to interfere with the busy intersection of Talbot and Grady Way. Staff recommends site plan approval subject to the following conditions: (1) that applicant comply with the ERC mitigation measures of payment of fire and traffic mitigation fees; (2)that applicant revise the site plan to provide direct pedestrian connections from sidewalks along South Grady Way and Talbot Road South to the building entries. • Pat Donnelly, 3050 Main Street,#350, Irvine, CA 92614, applicant representative herein, addressed security issues. He stated that behind the service building where vehicles are kept for service there is a 6 foot masonry • wall surround. The rest of the site has an 18 inch high rail fence to prevent cars being driven offsite other than through the appropriate exits. He further detailed Autonation's sales approach and its opposition to pedestrian access'to the vehicle display areas. Regarding the industrial waste water system, it discharges into the sanitary system after going through oil-water separator. That includes the service area and the car wash. The car wash has a recycle system. Mark Steepy, 1'201 Third Avenue,#900, Seattle, Washington 98101, applicant representative herein, stated that there is a hydraulic connection between the wetland and the stream buffers and it occurs next to Talbot where the stream is in a concrete channel and ends about 20 feet short of Talbot. It then goes into a culvert underneath Talbot. During large storm events water will go out into the wetland. In many locations, but not all, the wetland goes to the concrete channel, so the driveway has been offset 25 feet from the western edge of the wetland. Neil Watts, Plan Review Supervisor, Development Services Division, City or Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98055, addressed the issue of traffic at the intersection of Talbot and Grady Way. Because of the,type of use of the proposed facility, it is not expected to generate traffic at peak rush hour times. The conflict of;left-hand turns into the site and the left-turn lane from Talbot to Grady was studied. It was determined that the proposed access was desirable for this site. If at a later time the turning proposes a problem, the City can require C-curbing to limit access. Mr. Watts further addressed street improvement requirements along Benson Road, Grady Way and Talbot. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further cominents from staff. The hearing closed at 10:05 a.m. • FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION • Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Robert Dwors for Autonation USA, filed a request for approval of a Site Plan for an automobile sales complex. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. • Robert Dwors Autonation USA Corp. Autonation USA File No.: LUA-98-151,SA-H,V-H December 14, 1998 Page 4 3. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M)for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located at 915 South Grady Way. The site is located on the southeast corner of the intersection of South Grady Way and Talbot Road South. The site is immediately west of the new Renton City Hall and is the site of a Puget Sound Energy complex that will be removed. 6. The subject site consists of a very irregularly shaped parcel that is approximately 1,700 feet long(north to south) by 1,000 feet long. The site and surrounding streets are not quite oriented in a north-south or east-west direction, making some locations a bit ambiguous. The current owner, Puget Sound Energy, proposes selling a 1.30 acre portion at the northeast corner of the site to the City for use by the new City Hall. The remaining parcel, approximately 18.89 acres,will be used for the proposed complex, open space,wetland preservation and hillside protection. 7. The eastern third of the site is dominated by the steep slope located between the subject site and Benson Road South. The site also has an approximately .84 acre Category 2 wetland in the southern end of the site. A stream confined to a concrete channel flows below the steep Benson slopes. 8. The site currently contains a number of buildings which have a footprint of approximately 81,241 square feet and the site is surfaced with a mix of various paving materials and compacted gravel. 9. A portion of the site was part of the original City when it was incorporated in 1901. The remainder of the site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinances 738 and 1547 enacted in March 1925 and May 1956 respectively. 10. The subject site was reclassified Commercial Arterial (CA)with the adoption of Ordinance 4404 in June 1993. 11. As part of the original application,the applicant proposed installing planting adjacent to the creek and work within the 25 foot setback area required around creeks. The applicant applied for a variance to allow this restoration.work. Staff determined that the variance is only required if vegetation is to be cleared. In this case the creek'is surrounded by asphalt and gravel and no vegetation will be removed as there is none in that area. A variance is,therefore,not needed. • 12. The applicant proposes developing an approximately 53,200 square foot combined showroom and service building for the sales and servicing of automobiles. There will be a number of associated outdoor facilities including a delivery area, display parking area, a test track and employee and customer parking areas. 13. The building is approximately 350 feet long by 150 feet deep. The long axis of the building will be aligned with Grady Way but is set back from Grady by approximately 250 feet. The building will be set back approximately 300 feet from Talbot. The proposed building is approximately 34 feet tall. The facade will be articulated. The building will be taller at the entrance and have columnar treatments at the corners of the front, south or southwest facade. Robert Dwors Autonation USA Corp. Autonation USA • File No.: LUA-98-151,SA-H,V-H December 14, 1998 I Page 5 14. The proposed building will cover approximately 6 percent of the parcel whereas coverage of 65 percent is allowed. 15. A large,part of the complex will consist of parking areas. There will be 506 stalls along the Grady and Talbot frontages for sales display. There will be 129 stalls for service storage located near the northeast corner of the site. To the rear or east side of the site there will be 193 customer and employee parking stalls. 16. There will only be one primary access driveway to the site. The driveway will be located along Talbot: It will enter the site and traverse up the eastern edge of the site, adjacent to the channelized creek. The driveway will permit both left and right turns into and out of the site. It will be approximately 650 feet • south of the Grady Way intersection to avoid turning conflicts. Staff and the applicant worked on creating a driveway that would not interfere with either the arterial flow or turning movements. The City would reserve the right to alter access if problems arose. A second gated driveway would provide emergency access along Grady Way. 17. There would be extensive site landscaping that will continue the automall streetscape theme. The theme requires 15 feet of landscaping along Grady and Talbot including a grass berm and red maples at 25 feet on center. Unfortunately this will result in the removal of the existing mature plantings found along Talbot and possibly on other locations on the subject site. The applicant should check to see if its matureplantings may be appropriately substituted in certain aspects of its landscaping plans. The applicant will be providing approximately 15.8 percent landscaping over the site. Plantings are concentrated along the building facades and at entry points to the site. 18. The applicant will be providing a minimum 19 foot stream buffer and a minimum 25 foot wetland buffer.,The City regulations require preservation of the .84 acre Category 2 wetland. The applicant will employ wetland buffer averaging to provide additional buffer along the east side of the wetland where the steep slopes prevent development in any event. A bermed wetland buffer will replace paving between the access road and the wetland. The channel in which the creek flows is approximately 3 feet deep and 4 feet wide. The applicant proposes a dense buffer with evergreens and other mass plantings to create a habitat and discourage intrusions. As noted, it will have a minimum width of 19 feet. • 19. Surface water will be directed to a biofiltration swale near Grady Way. Contaminated waters will be dumped to the sewer system. The car wash will utilize a water recycling system. 20. The site is designed to accommodate the driving public and staff has recommended that an additional pedestrian link to Grady be provided. • 21. In order to provide security,the perimeter of the site along the accessible street frontages will be secured by pipe railing and not by cyclone fencing. • 22. The project will generate approximately 1,520 daily vehicle trips. CONCLUSIONS: l. The site plan ordinance provides a number of specific criteria for reviewing a site plan. Those criteria are generally represented in part by the following enumeration: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; • Robert Dwors Autonation USA Corp. Autonation USA File No.: LUA-98-151,SA-H,V-H December:14, 1998 Page 6 • b. Conformance with the Building and Zoning Codes; c. Mitigation of impacts on surrounding properties and uses; d. Mitigation of the impacts of the proposal on the subject site itself; e. Conservation of property values; f. Provision for safe and efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation; • g. Provision of adequate light and air; • • h. Adequacy of public services to accommodate the proposed use; The proposed use satisfies these and other particulars of the ordinance. 2. The proposed use is compatible with a variety of goals of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed site plan preserves the wetland and steep slope and while the creek remains embedded in a concrete channel, enhanced landscaping will improve its appearance. The use itself will create additional . employment as called for in the Comprehensive Plan for this area. 3. The proposed building meets the bulk,height and setback requirements of the Building Code. The plan also meets the requirements imposed by the automall overlay in the additional setbacks and . landscaping. 4. The proposed use will generate more traffic in the area but staff reports that the traffic can be handled by the street system. The one driveway has been located to avoid interference with intersection turning movements at Grady and Talbot and most of the traffic will be generated during off-peak hours. Other than the traffic and possibly more comings and goings than the current use,there should be minimum impacts on any surrounding uses.• 5. As noted,the applicant will be increasing the landscaping found on the site although potentially sacrificing the existing mature.plantings now found.on the site. The creek corridor will be enhanced, the wetland buffered appropriately and the slope retained in its current state. The building appears well-designed with articulations that should reduce its apparent bulk and the generous setbacks from the street will reduce its visual appearance. The security fencing will be minimally intrusive but reduce the chance of theft. The Grady corridor with its enhanced landscaping should be welcoming to both drivers and pedestrians. The applicant should provide an additional pedestrian connection to the Grady corridor even though the site is automobile oriented. 6. The redevelopment of the site will probably help property values and should increase the overall tax • base of the City. • 7. Presumably the applicant and staff have determined that only one driveway will be adequate and safe for a complex of this size. The circulation patterns within the site seem safe and adequate with internal • signs directing the flow of arrivals. The City always maintains the necessary discretion to limit turning movements into or out of a site if problems arise. Robert Dwors ' Autonation USA Corp. Autonation ti on USA • File No.: LUA-98-151,SA-H,V-H December 14,,1998 ' Page 7 8. The generally low-rise nature of the building coupled with its location should not impede the entry of light and air to the site. 9. The site is served by City utilities which should have sufficient capacity. 10. In conclusion,the City determined to extend the automall designation in this direction and the proposed use is an appropriate use given that decision. DECISION: The proposed site plan is approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall comply with the ERC mitigation measures prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. Applicant shall revise the site plan to provide direct pedestrian connections from the sidewalks along South Grady Way and Talbot Road South to the building entries. The revised site plan shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. ORDERED THIS 14th day of December, 1998. FRED J. KA AN HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 14th day of December, 1998 to the parties of record: Peter Rosen I Pat Donnelly Mark Steepy 1055 S Grady Way 3050 Main Street, #350 1201 Third Avenue,#900 Renton, WA 98055 Irvine, CA 92614 Seattle, WA 98101 Neil Watts 1055 S Grady WA Renton, WA 98055 TRANSMITTED THIS 14th day of December, 1998 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman,Plan/Bldg/PW Admin. Members, Renton Planning Commission . Jim Hanson, Development Services Director Chuck Duffy, Fire Marshal Mike Kattermann, Technical Services Director Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Larry Meckling, Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Sue Carlson, Econ. Dev. Administrator South County Journal Robert Dwors Autonation USA Corp. Autonation USA File No.: LUA-98-151,SA-H,V-H December 14, 1998 Page 8 Pursuant to Title IV,Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m.,December 28, 1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact,error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14)days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant,and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper. •• An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV,Chapter 8, Section 16,which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk,accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department,first floor of City Hall. If the Examiner's Recommendation'or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as • Appeals to the City Council. I • ,\\'' �� PROJE• CT • E z:. NsF • Rai '.1.. SITE les.. CROP ,4 Opp; S JONES AVE S �•::%'.••. y1Q'• NIGH AVE v. S O L y .ep� CRANT L VE S� , �~ Ccc c �' q �,_ P.ENTON AVE „ S ` / g•` ty i.C•c • h �a CEDAP. AVE A •9., �� �C y `W I Av n ' s S POOo 1>R WIL1 A 5 AVE N ►YELLS ` AVE s c - :. '` 1ALBT 40aD tCtNggy E, AVE S f NBURtIET AVE 'S. a • ' Q�RE4T°N VILLAGE i LOGAN AVE S CENTER •< N r J N > L • RPRT2 ® v N p�A O ;;°"® ��o • SCHOOL v To ,, OAV1S AVE S O Ei \ n ¢ LArE AVE .=� %^ih;R P4A&K kB RIDE T® 4iTaP�E qy� A ' RAINIER AVE 167 P.P1�' �, HARox ..,, ` 2 E VALLEY RD STD J AVE i } o �� ` .c L J c 1 a LIND 1 AVE SW $ O i coI5 / . • I ;t, �. v..14i1,' Consulting Engineers FIGURE 1 1201 Third Avenue. Suite 900 VICINITY MAP Seattle. Washington 98101 • (206) 622-5822 I Fax (206) 622-8130 N.T.S. • _• -- raMN oH °are Sti • •• PROJECT •8110rWALL ���Z� - S ©� • -:R:"�--- • Sii �� . 1PROPOSED 1 11 — 'TAVeiPACEERTT. ire—h....L.7...$). -a . • 41MMLIEN___ :.—fie.:it IMOP milli wA.c r. •I it -. y. • v'� `� `\ �\ mum� 111.11 ,1�� ',.1 ! " C 6i /<\ IL___ _ ,. `\ `\ • •� BO STALLS `� ' IS7 BNfICA GTE �'i.'�i r . T y• EAD tiyt';a,\,:: .4.. .. ;,r„j , '� �, �� tit 18 . .. r• ,, MAP ' VICINITY d \': .ewecesv `/ C Eer PAAKN] "'a>\ ,\ ` : Sal.r•1m'1 • \�\,.0 GATE -Gfl WA 1 r •121 HIAl19. ) 1 IL `\ g �•AV2d1ATC CA2D T -- / t .:� 1� fir\ e %i - •Z. • i • atnAT 1SW .E:l. �� • \\' 910 STALLS 1 •• _ 07 70 WOE tasmx.•YJ •\ ..... \\ • - �1 '.\)s '•.\;,,• .4//,. \+'•• `�� let 0 WrIYCE ACCESS WEN /fir\ • \\ /.\\' \ ,\ It1 ftLf10lA]GOES '�`, 7EsT Q1,, •\` �'�!. \�-�'/,r.\ •O '\'\:•` gr FAFFBI�1/'� .,\. . . ' `::N,e^\�\\\ ���\\` \` FEW-iu�isY •:\�i .. -,j 7o'Ha1 TEEM >y A :: \`\` '\\� \\ .\`.:v 4.`: Rj \/• IEI \' •41 iv\\\�:"tlii''•\ . �•\.. .\\\ Cam,._ 11, r ! i mini • \�: !i, .. \,:;•`It,`�!; `�.'• ., �` 1\Il10:•Ilt:rlll__ / .r Ill; �y SITE DEVELOPMENT DATA • \\\ Q O`•• E il;• /> �1\l\'l air_ ` Prrwrtuz •m—_---:�2s �C/ %!~ • mrc rilprla r pp m \\ .'. .5 . ' \\\\ i%•". t7w ''r 1[,a«¢vO.m1 P Icn.tua alum) \`\\•'. '•'i '•(4—°v .\\\\�\•% • rxam •low • • ., 4nnc.004 YR wOG.Kr1 \ \ ` " . • ' an./..P.1: tv \��� efaHal2Y.ra.u1,A SffE AL�NNOTE— `(Q 1rMpI140KNb0(f11r11 1. ME HAIPCI . 4•J — 7>J 0410 Rai P*V0D VI M4V 1.4v 4N • 't 1ua..VI11VO.11K 4r1M1,CM"a'IN 0415 ••6 ..I01.00ID 1 I•Y IAIM out.PrUa 5411411 WV rYrK n111..1t •I.t p:Ti 1vwurr1c aSl.:u g_ ILL,C _ANT: .4_1.0V0 pttl.rl% •-• • Inc MOall1.t Yll.t mawA•I.rr< 111411 M WOW..47. oa.1M..1c D ur s FOR SITE PLAN REWIEW ONLY I pC1 WO.aat.v1R 1M 1014 454r5111 1,0414 158.51415 Y.1Y4 r.M0, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION .141.rw•Mtn.r1 YR mt44 not.IlMl.n-Tut MU Rat.YU 11)001.11 1..IM}t!•IW I.Rrl.l Ka 1.11101 L 11 1405/./R 4.40 0U1411011 ..rYY ROM r10ton Inn .r y11 pomp rt.r1..m04 ..1.% GRAPHIC SCALC 1.001tY000 110. 0 11rr01 L/1 / R! 1a0vAK.4.I.o.1aD 1UD111 L 11 t1�-11� CALL r0/1017q ((= T-LRl <VC.I. a.1)011e 11 . 1/ m-YR I.N.1.1.a. 1211114/1 1rm11 I YQl 5,, �? I.w•r4 Fe00.121•SSeS C e - Woo n o.0 uac: AUTONATION USA l c2r 2 „ 1., ,M M..r-.e • { alrcrsEy---wlu.r.11• l:ar/r•p[.pa . AufoNa Co'h inm o2E SALES RENTON,WASHINCTON C�•� IA (13.t r,..,ofll.rr t,0:,,.., ..7 •1 cxulc P K4r. PpI MO Anna Bon 700 :•.' �V i.RENIRY \ DI-n.r�w.: - V.v1w r'•L'_ 9 '�RFlITOK WASFNOTCMI -- 1 n•1 • ;w..wto II — 1e2.. '`,":="i^` CONCEPTUAL W Q >" np; �r C.O. .p10 n1v.l.0r. W - ' . ____.- S:!.::1— 411 i -{11)—1.11P1M11"W.I Fi;'- -i'''—i--k EMI 1 f _1_1 I I 1 SOUTHEAST ELEVATION ......wd-...- aria ....... iv... _I , esi --"'__, ri.____•.,, • ,...,...,_ ; _ , . ...,.: .:„„...„...,.:,:.::......., , ,., = •......, ,....,..„.„,,,„, .. , - „,...,,,:, _ i ,, , . _ ,,=,,,i, • • . , _. , . SOUTHWEST ELEVATION - ;-- ,...-- — — _._;--- ;-- r fl - — fl , J �� — - . NORTHWEST ELEVATION .- MO.UM* • NORTHEAST ELEVATION co:-..--.: II AutoN>aton 1 AUTONATION TIER ONE SALES FACILITY. ,I ELEVATIONS p—ro RENTON, WA. o ,� ,2'Cp�„,E SCALE ,N_«i i° w.Y....L.. SEPT 21, 1998 lad 1 Lv4 W.11,dS a IJ19S AUDI OU.IN`tltW.:el z011S. ,b1 Ia.L w,IL..' I 1 1 City of Renton PUBLIC Department of Planning/Building/Public Works 0 HEARING PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER 1 I • A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Public Hearing Date: December 1, 1998 Project Vame: Autonation USA . • Ap licant/ Robert Dwors Address Autonation USA Corp. 110 SE 6th Street, Ste. 1700 Ft Lauderdale, FL. 33301 Owner/ Bob Boyd Address:, Puget Western Inc. 19515 Northcreek Pkwy.,#310 Bothell, WA. 98011 File Number: LUA-098-151, SA-H, V-H, ECF Project Manager: Peter Rosen 1 Project Description: Proposal for an auto sales facility consisting of a 53,200 sq. ft. showroom/service building, retail display parking for 506 vehicles, 129 parking stalls for vehicle ' service/storage, and 193 parking stalls for customers and employees. Three existing buildings on the site presently owned and used by Puget Sound Energy would be demolished. The primary access drive onto the site would be off Talbot Road South,with a gated emergency service driveway on South Grady Way. There 1 is a .84 acre Category 2 wetland in the southeast corner of the site which would not be directly impacted by the proposal. A stream flows through a concrete channel on the east part of the site. Project Location: 915 S. Grady Way, southeast corner of intersection of S. Grady Way and Talbot Road S. 4rtri ti%. 1 ir s'" 1U1110,1fr,/ I `S 4r v _ C 7l f ////"' .71.1.-tr: : • C/I' ,+ 1 )1 s. ,,, ', ...—,Nj--- CD`'jfi 1 8cv SS.*S.Sf1 SL'.n Sr �� o„ar I w ^ :. 4 • • • City of Renton P/B/PW Depai;: •,;t Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner • • AUTONATION USA LUA-98-151,SA-H, V-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 1, 1998 Page 2 of 9- . B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Puget Western Inc. 2. Zoning Designation: Commercial Arterial (CA) 3. Comprehensive Plan Employment Area Commercial (EAC) Land Use Designation: 4. Existing Site Use: Puget Sound Energy facility 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: S. Grady Way, Commercial, Renton City Hall East: Benson Road S., Interstate 405 South: Interstate 405 West: Office, Renton Village Shopping Center 6. Access: Talbot Road S., S. Grady Way 7. Site Area: 20.19 acres total 18.89 acres Autonation site 8. Project Data: area comments Existing Building Area: 81,241 sq. ft. (to be demolished) New Building Area: 53,200 sq. ft. Total Building Area: 53,200 sq. ft. C. HISTORICALBACKGROUND: Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date Incorporated 1901 Annexation 738 3-26-25 Annexation 1547 5-15-56 Comprehensive Plan 4498 2-20-95 Zoning Code 4404 6-7-93 D. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE 1. Zoning Code- Chapter 31, Section 4-31-10.4., Commercial Arterial (CA) Zone. 2. Zoning Code- Chapter 31, Section 4-31-33, Site Plan Review. 3. Chapter 9 - Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance. HEXRPT2.DOC • • City of Renton P/B/PW Department ; Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner aurorvarioty USA 1 LUA-98-151,SA-H, V-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 1, 1998 Page 3 of 9 F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Land Use Element-Employment Area-Commercial (EAC) Economic Development Element G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant seeks site plan review approval and approval of a variance to construct an auto sales facility consisting of a 53,200 sq. ft. showroom/service building, retail display parking for 506 vehicles, 129 parking stalls for vehicle service/storage, and 193 parking stalls for customers and employees. The facility would also include a vehicle service center for diagnostics, oil and lube, and vehicle detailing. The site is currently owned and used by Puget Sound Energy for the storage/maintenance of electrical and gas equipment. Three existing buildings existing on the site would be demolished. Puget Sound Energy has conducted soil remediation activities on the site in preparation of redevelopment. • The primary access drive onto the site would be off Talbot Road South, with a gated • emergency service driveway on South Grady Way. There is a .84 acre Category 2 wetland in the southeast corner of the site which would not be directly impacted by the proposal. The applicant is proposing buffer width averaging to satisfy code requirements for wetland buffers. ' A stream flows through a concrete channel on the east and south part of the site. The applicant does not propose removal of the concrete channel and the proposal would not directly impact the creek. At present, there is no vegetated buffer adjacent to the creek, the entire buffer width consists of asphalt and compacted gravel. The applicant is proposing to remove the existing asphalt and compacted gravel surfacing directly adjacent to the creek and then incorporate a stream/wetland planted buffer area with a minimum width of 19 feet. The Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance requires a minimum 25 foot buffer width from the high water mark of creeks. Therefore, the applicant applied for a variance to allow the primary access road to encroach approximately 6 feet into the required 25 foot buffer. Upon analysis of the proposal, staff has determined that a variance is not required. The Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance code provision, Section 4-9-5:D. states that: "No tree cutting or land clearing is permitted within twenty-five feet (25') of any shoreline area, within twenty five feet (25) or the ordinary high water mark of creeks, in a wetland area, or on parcels where the predominant slope or individual slope is in excess of forty percent (40%) .. except enhancement activities." Because the existing buffer area is not vegetated and consists of asphalt and compacted gravel, there would not be any tree cutting or land clearing within the required buffer area. The code includes a definition of "land clearing" as follows: "The act of removing or destroying trees or ground cover including grubbing of stumps and root mat from any undeveloped lot, partially developed lot, developed lot, public lands or public right-of-way." The removal of impervious surfaces is not considered land clearing. Puget Western, present owner of the property, has agreed to sell approximately 1.19 acres on the north part of the site to the City of Renton for City Hall parking improvements. HEXRPT2.DO;C City'of Renton P/B/PW Deps,',„maf Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner- . . AUTONATION USA LUA-98-151,SA-H, V-H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 1, 1998 Page 4 of9. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21 C, 1971 as amended), the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non- Significance, Mitigated on October 27, 1998. The mitigation measures are listed below. The comment/appeal period for the SEPA threshold determination ended on November 16. ' No comments or appeals were received. 3 COMPLIANCE WITH ERC MITIGATION MEASURES Based on an analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, the following mitigation measures were issued for the Determination of Non-Significance, Mitigated. 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $0.52.per square foot of new construction. The applicant will receive credit for the existing buildings that would be demolished by the proposal. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable at the time that Building Permits are issued. 2. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated at $114,000 (1,520 trips x$75 = $114,000). This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. 4. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address site plan issues from the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. 5. CONSISTENCY WITH SITE PLAN APPROVAL CRITERIA • Section 4-31-33 (D.) "The Hearing Examiner and City staff shall review and act upon site plans based upon comprehensive planning considerations and the following criteria. These .. criteria are objectives of good site plans to be aimed for in development within the City of Renton. However, strict compliance with any one or more particular criterion may not be necessary or reasonable. These criteria also provide a frame of reference for the applicant in developing a site, but are not intended to be inflexible standards or to discourage creativity and innovation. The Site Plan Review criteria include, but are not limited to, the following:" HEXRPT2.DOC • ' City of Renton P/B/PW Department , Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner • AUTONATiON USA _F LUA-98-151,SA-H, V-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 1, 1998 Page 5 of 9 GENERAL CRITERIA: I (1) CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ITS ELEMENTS & POLICIES The City Council approved a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and rezone for the subject site on October 5, 1998. The Comprehensive Plan designation was changed from Employment Area Industrial (EAI) to Employment Area Commercial (EAC). The proposal is consistent with objectives and policies of the EAC designation. Land uses intended for the EAC designation are those that require large amounts of land and high visibility and access to large volumes of automobile traffic. (Objective LU-AA) The large auto retail use is consistent with this objective. The proposal is consistent with the following EAC policies which provide guidance regarding landscaping, access, compatibility with adjacent uses, etc. related to the site plan. Policy LU-169. Individual parcels should be encouraged to consolidate to maximize flexibility of site design and reduce access points. The proposal includes only one primary vehicle access point onto the site. Policy LU-170. Individual development projects should be encouraged to: a. minimize curb cuts and share access points, b. provide for internal circulation among adjacent parcels, c. share parking facilities, d. centralize signing, e. create a unified style of development, and I , f. provide landscaping and streetscaping to soften visual impacts. Policy LU-177. Special design considerations (e.g. landscape, streetscape, signage, building design) should be encouraged for areas which are designated as gateways for the city. The proposal would create a unified site appearance with coordinated signage and a site plan/design that is organized to direct customers. Landscaping along the street frontages (S. Grady Way and Talbot Road S.) would continue the consistent streetscape required for • Automall uses. Policy ED-8. Increase the retail sales tax base of the City. The proposal furthers the City's intent to expand the retail sales base. (2) CONFORMANCE WITH EXISTING LAND USE REGULATIONS The subject site was rezoned by the City Council on October 5, 1998, from Heavy Industrial (IH) and Commercial Office (CO)to Commercial Arterial (CA). The following requirements and development standards contained in Section 4-31-10.4 Commercial Arterial (CA) of the Zoning Code [adopted June 1993] are applicable to this proposal Permitted Uses The subject site is zoned Commercial Arterial (CA). Auto sales are allowed as a primary permitted use in the CA zone. Auto service and repair are also permitted uses in the zone. HEXRPT2.DOC � I - City of Renton P/B/PW Depar,, ,,. Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner , AUTOMATION USA LUA.98-151, SA-H, V-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 1, 1998 Page 6 of 9 Setbacks The CA zone requires a front/street building setback of a minimum of 10 feet. The subj' site fronts along S Grady Way, Talbot Avenue S., and Benson Road S. The proposed building is setback at least 200 feet from all street frontages. No rear or side interior setbacks are required for development in the CA zone. Height- The CA zone allows a maximum building height of 50 feet. The proposal complies with the height limit. According to the building elevations, the maximum building height of the top of parapets would be 34 feet. Lot Coverage - Maximum allowable lot coverage for buildings in the CA zone is 65%. The proposal would result in building lot coverage of approximately 6% of the total lot area, well below the maximum allowed. Landscaping - The subject site was added into Automall Area B with a zoning code amendment. The City Council approved the expansion of the Automall in October 1998. The code differentiates landscape standards for auto dealerships in Automall Areas A and B from the standard landscape requirements of the CA zone. The code requires 1) a minimum 15 foot wide landscape strip along the street frontages of S. Grady Way and Talbot Road S. improved a grass berm and Red Maples planted 25 feet on center; 2) a minimum of 2.5% of the gross site area to be provided as on-site landscaping, focused at site entries, building fronts or other visually prominent locations. The proposal meets these landscape requirements. According to the applicant, approximately 130,464 square feet (15.8% of the gross site area) is provided in newly planted landscaping. The landscaping is generally concentrated around the building and site entries to meet code objectives. The Parking and Loading Ordinance requires that large parking lots over 10,000 square feet in size have a minimum of 5% interior landscaping. This requirement does not apply to display area parking. According to the landscape plan, 7,464 square feet of parking landscaping is provided, equal to approximately 8.3% of the total public/employee parking area. The code requires pedestrian connections to be provided between the public entrance of buildings and the street. The proposal does not include pedestrian connections to the public sidewalks from either S. Grady Way or Talbot Road S. There are a couple of obvious connections that could be provided to accommodate pedestrians and link the sidewalks and building entries. Staff recommends that the applicant revise the site plan to provide pedestrian connections from S. Grady Way and Talbot Road S. Parking Requirements - The City's Parking and Loading Ordinance has different parking standards for the various uses/activities that would be included under the proposal. The applicant has provided a parking analysis listing the square foot area and the required number of spaces for the outdoor retail/car display area, the indoor sales area, motor vehicle repair and service, and indoor part storage. According to the parking analysis, 115 parking stalls are required for employee and guest parking. The site plan includes a total of 193 parking spaces meeting the code standard. Wetlands and Streams- There is an existing wetland located in the south corner of the site. • The wetland boundary generally follows the toe of the slope to the south, and the edge of the concrete drainage channel and Talbot Road S. A wetland report prepared by Pentec Environmental, Inc. identifies the .84 acre wetland as a Category 2 wetland because it is greater than 2,200 square feet in size and has minimal evidence of human-related physical alteration. Category 2 wetlands require a 50 foot wide undisturbed buffer. The existing Puget Power facility is paved directly up to a concrete drainage channel which also forms the edge of the wetland boundary. Therefore, there is no existing vegetated wetland buffer along the north edge of the wetland. The proposal would not fill or directly impact the wetland. The applicant is proposing construct a bermed wetland buffer in place of existing pavement, between the north edge of the wetland and the proposed access road. The applicant is proposing to use provisions for HEXRPT2.DOC - • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner AUTONATION USA LUA-98-151, SA-H, V-H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 1, 1998 Page 7 of 9. wetland buffer averaging as allowed in the Wetlands Management Ordinance. The proposed buffer area would maintain a minimum 25 foot width. The code allows buffer averaging to ' reduce the standard buffer width to a maximum of 50% of the required width. The total wetland buffer area required would be provided on the site. The south and east edge of the wetland abuts the slope going up toward Benson Road. The applicant proposes to use this area for buffer averaging, to make up for any shortfall in the buffer area along the north edge of the wetland. The proposed buffer averaging complies with the code requirements. The• restoration of a vegetated wetland buffer area to replace the existing pavement would be an improvement over the existing conditions, providing value for wildlife habitat and wetland/stream functions. There is an existing drainage channel or stream, an unnamed tributary to Rolling Hills Creek, that flows across the east and south sides of the site in an open concrete channel, 4 feet wide by 3 feet deep. The course of the stream is described in the environmental review report. According to the wetland report prepared by Pentec Environmental, Inc. for the proposal, no fish were observed in the stream during their investigation. No electrofishing was conducted and it is uncertain whether there is fish use (salmonids) downstream from the site. The existing Puget Power facility is paved right up to the concrete channel, there is no existing vegetated buffer. The proposal would not directly impact the stream, and the applicant proposes to leave the concrete channel intact. The applicant is proposing to remove the existing asphalt and compacted gravel surfacing and plant a stream/wetland buffer area with a minimum width of 19 feet. The proposed stream buffer planting consists of native evergreen and deciduous trees and shrubs planted at a high density (mass planting). • The native plantings would provide for wildlife habitat, assist in reducing the temperature of water in the creek, and discourage the public from entering .the stream area. The proposal would improve the existing environmental conditions on the site. Staff has determined that code requirements for a 25 foot stream buffer are not applicable • because the buffer requirements are for tree cutting and groundcover removal which does not apply to the removal of impervious surfaces. I , (3) MITIGATION OF IMPACTS TO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND USES; The subject site is bordered on the east and south by Interstate 405 (1-405). There are steep vegetated embankments which go up from the site to 1-405, giving the appearance of a green perimeter. This isolates the site on two sides from adjacent land uses. To the north is the Renton City Hall and office uses exist to the west. The proposed building is located in the center of the site, surrounded by large expanses of auto display and customer/employee parking. Perimeter landscaping is proposed along street frontages. The site plan layout would not impact use of surrounding properties. The operation of the auto sales facility would not create adverse impacts on surrounding properties and uses. (4) MITIGATION OF IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN TO THE SITE; I I The proposal would redevelop the Puget Sound Energy site which is presently used for the storage/maintenance of electrical and gas equipment. Most of the site is covered with impervious surfaces. Puget Sound Energy has conducted soil remediation activities to remove contaminants on the site in preparation of redevelopment. The proposal would not affect significant natural features on the site. The steep vegetated slopes along the east part of the property below Benson Road would be left undisturbed. The proposal also avoids impacts to the wetland and stream on the site. A vegetated stream/ wetland buffer would be densely planted with native plants to replace existing asphalt and gravel, an improvement over existing conditions on the site. The proposal would also add more landscape area than presently exists on the site. 1 ' HEXRPT2.DOC I I • City of Renton P/B/PW Depa::..: .t Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner AUTONATION USA LUA-98-151,SA-H, V-H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 1, 1998 Page 8 of 9- (5) CONSERVATION.OF AREA-WIDE PROPERTY VALUES; The proposed redevelopment is expected to improve area-wide property values. The sL_ would be converted from an industrial site used for the storage/maintenance of electrical and gas equipment to an auto retail use. (6) SAFETY AND EFFICIENCY OF VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN - CIRCULATION; The primary access drive onto the site would be off Talbot Road, with a gated emergency service driveway on South Grady Way. The number of access points onto the site are limited for security purposes. A traffic report was prepared by Transportation Planning & Engineering, Inc. The report concludes that the level of service at the intersections of Grady Way and Talbot Rd. S and Grady Way and Rainier Ave. S. would not be significantly reduced as a result of this project. The project would not adversely impact surrounding streets and there are no planned or programmed City or State roadway projects that require contributions. Sight distances at the main driveway access off Talbot Road S. are acceptable and the proposed driveway location would not have significant impacts to traffic along Talbot Road S. The proposal would result in an increase in traffic trips over the existing use of the site and therefore would be subject to the City's Transportation Mitigation Fee which was imposed as a SEPA mitigation measure. As discussed in a previous section, the applicant has not provided a pedestrian connection from sidewalks along street frontages to the building entry. Staff has recommended a site plan condition for the applicant to revise plans and provide the required pedestri.^ connection. Pedestrian circulation internal to the site appears adequate. (7) PROVISION OF ADEQUATE LIGHT AND AIR; The proposed building is situated in the center of the site and there would be adequate light and air to the building. The proposal would not impact light and air to adjacent properties. • • (8) NOISE, ODORS AND OTHER HARMFUL OR UNHEALTHY CONDITIONS; Noise, dust and odors would result with construction of the project. These impacts would be mitigated through measures described in the Construction Mitigation Plan and with best management practices. The operation of the auto sales facility is not expected to create harmful or unhealthy conditions. (9) AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED USE; AND There are adequate utilities and roads available to serve the proposed development. Police and Fire have indicated that adequate resources exist to serve the auto sales facility. • (10) PREVENTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD DETERIORATION AND BLIGHT. The proposal would serve to prevent neighborhood deterioration and blight by redeveloping and improving an existing industrial site to commercial use. The proposed retail use wou' draw more intensive commercial activity into the area. HEXRPT2.DOC 1 • • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner • AUTONATION USA LUA-98-151, SA-H, V H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 1, 1998 Page 9 of 9 H. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the site plan for Autonation USA File No. LUA-98-051, ECF, SA-H, SA-V subject to the following conditions: (1) Compliance with ERC Mitigation Measures: The applicant is required to comply with the Mitigation Measures which were required by the Environmental Review Committee Threshold Determination, prior to the issuance of a building permit. (2)1 The applicant shall revise the site plan to provide direct pedestrian connections from the sidewalks along S. Grady Way and Talbot Road S. to the building entries. The revised site plan shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division prior to issuance of building permits. EXPIRATION PERIODS: Site Plan Approvals (SA): Two (2)years from the final approval (signature) date. • it I I • HEXRPT2.DOC I � • • DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED). • MITIGATION MEASURES • • APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-98-151,SA-H,V-H,ECF APPLICANT: Autonation USA Corp PROJECT NAME: Autonation USA DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for an auto sales facility consisting of a 53,200 sq. ft. showroom/ service building,.retail display parking for 506 vehicles, 129 parking stalls for vehicle service/storage, and 193 parking stalls for guests and employees. Three existing buildings on the site presently used by Puget Sound Energy would be demolished. The primary access drive onto the site would be off Talbot Road South, with a gated emergency service driveway on South Grady Way. There is a .84 acre Category 2 wetland in the southeast corner of the site which would not be directly impacted by the proposal. A stream flows through a concrete channel on the east part of the site. The proposal includes a variance request to construct the primary access drive encroaching into the required 25 foot stream buffer. Approximately .1.30 acres of the subject site will be sold to the City of Renton for additional City Hall parking. 0 LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 915 S. Grady Way • MITIGATION MEASURES: . 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction. The applicant will receive credit for the existing buildings that would be demolished by the proposal. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable at the time that Building Permits are issued. 2. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated $114,000 (1,520 trips x$75'1= $114,000). This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. • , • • • • • DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE •• (MITIGATED) • • ADVISORY NOTES• • APPLICATION NO(S):• LUA-98-151,SA-H,V-H,ECF APPLICANT: Autonation USA Corp PROJECT NAME: Autonation USA DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for an auto sales facility consisting of a 53,200 sq. ft. • showroom/ service building, retail display parking for 506 vehicles, 129 parking stalls for vehicle service/storage, and 193 parking stalls for guests and employees. Three existing buildings on the site presently used by Puget Sound Energy would be demolished. The primary access drive onto the site would be off Talbot Road South,with a gated emergency service driveway on South Grady Way. There is a .84 acre Category 2 wetland in the southeast corner of the site which would not be directly impacted by the proposal. A stream flows through a concrete channel on the east part of the site. The proposal includes a variance request to construct the primary access drive encroaching into the required 25 foot stream buffer. Approximately 1.30 acres of the subject site will be sold to the City of Renton for additional City Hall parking. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 915 S. Grady Way Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as Information only, they • are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. BUILDING Soils report states that additional liquefaction analysis is needed. •Geo iers are subject to additional Y p nl J review. Use the 1997 UBC for use, area and occupancy separations. Signs are subject to Renton sign code. FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flow is 3,250 GPM based on Type 5N construction. One fire hydrant is required within 150 feet of the building and 3 additional hydrants within 300 feet of the building, based on required fire flow. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for sprinkler and fire alarm systems installation. 3. Provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are to be used or stored on site. 4. All required fire access roadways are required to be a minimum of 20 feet wide unobstructed. The inside radius is 25 feet and the outside radius is 45 feet. All required fire lanes shall be marked per City Ordinance. PLAN REVIEW Water 1. There is an existing 24"water main adjacent to the site in Talbot Road S, an 18"water main in S Grady Way, and a 16"water main in Benson Road S. There are also several 8" and 6"water mains and four hydrants located on the site itself. 2. No additional water main extensions will be required for this project. 3. • The redevelopment credit for this site eliminates the requirement for payment of system development charges for water and sewer. . Surface Water::: '1. .There.is.a drainage.system from Renton Hill to theeast which crosses under I-405 and Benson and crossesthe southerly portion of the site in a combined culvert/ditch system. This:system • Autonatio'n USA V • 'LUA-98-151,SA-H,V-H,ECF Advisory Notes (Continued) . discharges into a developed pipe system in Talbot Rd S. There are also developed pipe drainage - systems in S Grady Way and Talbot Road S adjacent to the site. 2. A conceptual drainage plan and drainage report has been prepared and submitted with the site plan application for this project. The conceptual drainage plan includes provisions for water quality treatment) in compliance with the requirements of the KCSWM. No detention is required for this proposal,since there is no increase in the runoff rate anticipated from this site redevelopment. The conceptual drainage plan is approved as submitted. - 3. Since'there is no net increase in impervious surface on this site as part of the development proposal,'there will be no system development charge for surface water required for this project. Wastewater 1. Service to this site is provided by an 18" sewer main which runs across the southerly portion of the site from the east and into the system in Talbot Road S which then runs south before turning west across the Renton Village site connecting to the METRO Interceptor at Rainier and Grady. 2. No additional sewer main extensions will be required for this project. 3. The redevelopment credit for this site eliminates the requirement for payment of system development charges for water and sewer. Transportation 1. TalbotiRd S and S Grady Way are fully improved with curb, gutters, sidewalks and street lighting adjacent to this project site. Benson Rd S is a paved two lane arterial, with gravel shoulders and no curbs or sidewalks adjacent to this project site. No vehicular or pedestrian access is proposed to the site from Benson Rd S, due to inaccessibility across the steep slope, the wetland area and the • ditch/stream system. 2. City Code requires a project of this size to abut fully improved.streets. This would require the improvement of Benson Rd S adjacent to the site with curb, gutter and sidewalks for the entire frontage of the site. A request for waiver of this requirement has been made to the Board of Public Works. 3. A traffic report has been prepared for this project and included with the application. The traffic report has been prepared using methodology acceptable to the City. The report concludes that the level of service at the intersections of Grady Way and Talbot Rd and Grady Way and Rainier Ave S will not be significantly reduced as a result of this project. The report also concludes that the proposed driveway location is acceptable and will not have significant impacts to traffic along Talbot Rd S. Staff concurs with the conclusions of.the traffic study. General • All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according,to City of Renton drafting standards by a registered Civil Engineer. The construction permit application must include a itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,00 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over - $200,000 1 Half of this fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. PLANNING Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling tricks. PARKS All landscaped areas outside the property line are to be maintained by the property owner. Red Maples are planted directly in powerline right-of-way and under overhead lines in 2 locations along Grady Way and Talbot Road.-Trees grow to 35 foot height. Recommend coordination with power company to aVoid conflict and improper pruning. -T v VTVU C. USE RESTRICTION:;: nue S.W. . .. .he west, S.W. 10th Street on Notwithstanding any other provisions of this the north,and Lind Avenue S.W.on the east; Code, no use may be made of land within any air- • port approach zone or airport turning zone in such That area along the north side of S.W. Grady a manner as to create electrical interference with Way between Lind Avenue to the west and radio communication between the airport and air- Rainier Avenue S. on the east. Beginning at craft, making it difficult for fliers to distinguish be- a point approximately four hundred feet tween airport lights and others, result in glare in (400') north of S.W. Grady Way along the the eyes of fliers using the airport,impair visibility east side of Lind Avenue S.W. on the west, : in the vicinity thereof, or otherwise endanger the then east for a distance of approximately landing, taking off, or maneuvering of aircraft. three hundred twenty five feet (325'), then south to a point approximately one hundred D: HAZARD MARKING AND LIGHTING: eighty feet (180') north of S.W. Grady Way, Any permit or variance granted as provided in this then east from this point parallel to S.W. Section and affecting the airport approach,transi- Grady Way to a point approximately ninety . tion or turning zone shall be so conditioned as to feet (90') west of Rainier Avenue S., then . require the owner of the structure or tree in ques- north from this point approximately sixty feet tion to permit the City, at its own expense, to in- (60'),then west approximately fifty feet(50'), stall,operate and maintain thereon such markers and then north approximately two hundred fif- and lights as may be necessary to give adequate teen feet (215') and then east approximately notice to'aircraft of the presence of such airport one hundred sixty feet (160') to Rainier Ave- hazard. (Ord. 1542, 4-17-1956) nue S. on the east; That area north of South 7th Street and west 4-3-030 AQUIFER PROTECTION of Hardie Avenue generally described as the REGULATIONS: (Reserved) area beginning at the northwest corner of South 7th Street and Hardie Avenue S. and then proceeding west approximately four 4-3-040 AUTO MALL IMPROVEMENT hundred twenty five feet (425'), then north DISTRICT REGULATIONS: approximately four hundred fifty feet(450')to the southern edge of the Burlington Northern A. PURPOSE: Railroad right-of-way,then east along the These regulations are intended to help create a railroad ROW approximately two hundred regional auto mall that has a cohesive appear- thirty five feet (235') to Hardie Avenue and ance for improved retail activity. then south along Hardie Avenue to the begin- ning point; B. APPLICABILITY: That area north of South 7th Street between 1. Auto Mall Area A:That area bounded by Hardie Avenue on the west, the Burlington Grady Way S. on the north, Rainier Avenue Northern Railroad right-of-way on the north, S. (SR-167) on the east, 1-405 on the south, and Rainier Avenue on the east; and Raymond Avenue S. on the west. That area north of South 7th Street between 2. Auto Mall Area B: That area along the Rainier Avenue S.on the west, a line approx • - south side of S.W. Grady Way west of Ray- imately one hundred ninety feet (190') north mond Avenue S. between S.W. Grady Way of and parallel to South 7th Street on the. on the north, Raymond Avenue S. on the north, and Shattuck Avenue S. on the east; east. a north/south line approximately four The triangular area on the south side of South hundred feet(400')east of Raymond Avenue 7th Street between Hardie Avenue on the S.W. on the west, and S.W. Grady Way on west and Rainier Avenue on the east; the north: The larger area north of S. Grady Way be- That area along the north side of S.W. Grady tween Rainier Avenue on the west and Shat- Way west of Lind Avenue S. bounded by tuck Avenue S. on the east between South S.W.,Grady Way on the south, Powell Ave- I, 3 - 5 (Revised 1/99) 4-3-040B. 7th Street on the north and S. Grady Way on the south; . That area north of S. Grady Way between Shattuck Avenue S.on the west,the northern edge of the former railroad right-of-way ap- proximately one hundred fifty feet(150') north of S. Grady Way, and Talbot Road/ Smithers Avenue S. on the east; That area along the south side of S. Grady Way between SR-167/Rainier Avenue S. on the west and a north/south line approximately one thousand six hundred thirty feet(1,630') east of SR-167 on the east, S. Grady Way on the north, and on the southwest along S. Renton Village Place approximately one hun- dred seventy five feet (175')to the 1998 zon- ing boundary between the CA Zone and the CO Zone on the south; and That area along the south side of S. Grady Way east of Talbot Road bounded by Talbot Road on.the west, S. Grady Way on the northwest, Renton City Hall on the north/ northeast, Benson Road S. on the east/ southeast, and the 1-405 right-of-way on the south. (Revised 1/99) 3 - 6 . 4-3-U4 U U C. USES PERMITTED ill AUTO MALL IMPROVEMENT DISTHIL r: • . The following use provisions take precedence over the underlying zoning: USES ALLOWED IN AREA A USES ALLOWED IN AREA B Only the following uses are permitted within Auto Mall Area A Within the CA Zone:Auto,motorcycle,snowmobile,lawn and All uses permitted by the underlying zoning garden equipment, and passenger truck sales; • Secondary uses including: Licensing bureaus, car rentals, • public parking, and other uses determined by the Zoning Administrator to directly support dealerships; Within the IM Zone:Auto, motorcycle,snowmobile, lawn and garden equipment, passenger truck sales, and existing office; • Secondary uses including: Licensing bureaus, car rentals, public parking,off-site parking consistent with RMC 4-14-4C3 • and other uses determined by the Zoning Administrator to directly support dealerships. D. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR USES LOCATED WITHIN AUTO MALL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS—AREAS A AND B: All permitted uses in Area A and all auto sales and related uses in Area B of the Auto Mall Improvement District shall comply with the following development standards: ALL USES IN AREA A AND NON-DEALERSHIPS AND • DEALERSHIPS AND RELATED USES IN AREA B RELATED USES IN AREA B SERVICE AREA Service areas shall not face public Service areas shall not face public ORIENTATION street frontage. street frontage. • LANDSCAPING— A 15-foot-wide landscape strip along Pursuant to landscaping requirements STREET FRONTAGE these street frontages. This frontage listed in chapter 4-2 RMC LANDSCAPING requirement is in lieu of the frontage (requirements for the underlying zone) REQUIREMENTS requirement listed for the zone in and chapter 4-4 RMC. for lots which abut Lind chapter 4-2 RMC. Avenue S.W., S.W. Unimproved portions of the right-of-way Grady Way, Talbot may be used in combination with Road S. (SR-515) and abutting private property to meet the Rainier Avenue S. required 15-foot landscape strip width. The landscaping shall include a minimum 30-inch high berm and red maples (Acer rubrum) planted 25 feet on center. LANDSCAPING— 2.5% of the gross site area shall be Pursuant to landscaping requirements MINIMUM AMOUNT provided as on-site landscaping. listed in chapter 4-2 RMC AND LOCATION Landscaping shall be consolidated and (requirements for the underlying zone) located at site entries, building fronts, and chapter 4-4 RMC. or other visually prominent locations as approved through the site plan review process. 3 - 7 (Revised 1/99) 4-3-040D • • • ALL USES IN AREA A AND • DEALERSHIPS AND . NON-DEALERSHIPS AND RELATED USES IN AREA B RELATED USES IN AREA B WHEEL STOPS If frontage landscaping is relocated, If frontage landscaping is relocated, then permanent wheel stops or then permanent wheel stops or continuous curbs must be installed a continuous curbs must be installed a minimum of 2.5 feet from sidewalks to minimum of 2.5 feet from sidewalks to prevent bumper overhang of sidewalks. prevent bumper overhang of sidewalks. Where these requirements differ from Where these requirements differ from the requirements of the parking, the requirements of the parking, loading and driveway regulations of loading and driveway regulations of chapter 4-4 RMC, these requirements chapter 4-4 RMC,these requirements shall govern. shall govern. CUSTOMER Customer parking shall be designated Customer parking shall be designated PARKING and striped near entry drives and visible and striped near entry drives and visible from public streets. Where possible, from public streets. Where possible, customer parking shall be combined customer parking shall be combined with adjacent dealership customer with adjacent dealership customer parking and shared access. Where parking and shared access. Where these requirements differ from the these requirements differ from the requirements of the parking, loading requirements of the parking, loading and driveway regulations of chapter 4-4 and driveway regulations of chapter 4-4 RMC, these requirements shall govern. RMC,these requirements shall govern. AUTO MALL Once completed,all development shall Once completed, all development shall RIGHT-OF-WAY coordinate with a right-of-way coordinate with a right-of-way IMPROVEMENT PLAN improvement plan. A right-of-way improvement plan. A right-of-way COORDINATION improvement plan shall be completed improvement plan shall be completed by the City in coordination with adjacent by the City in coordination with adjacent property owners, and shall address property owners, and shall address gateways, signage, landscaping, and gateways, signage, landscaping, and shared access. shared access. AUTO MALL All development shall coordinate with All development shall coordinate with IMPROVEMENT PLAN the Auto Mall Improvement Plan the Auto Mall Improvement Plan COMPLIANCE adopted by Resolution No. 3182. The adopted by Resolution No. 3182. The plan addresses potential street plan addresses potential street vacations, right-of-way improvements, vacations, right-of-way improvements, area gateways, signage, landscaping, area gateways, signage, landscaping, circulation, and shared access. circulation, and shared access. MODIFICATIONS Where full compliance with these provisions would create a hardship for existing uses undergoing major modifications,the Zoning Administrator may modify them. Hardship for existing uses may result from existing lot coverage, existing siting of buildings. etc., which preclude full compliance. (Revised 1/99) 3 - 8 . 4-3-050B • E. POTENTIAL WAIVER OF STREET programs and resources to the end that the State VACATION FEES FOR DEALERSHIPS and its citizens may: LOCATED WITHIN AREA A: All street vacation fees and compensation for the 1. Fulfill the responsibilities of each genera- right-of-way may be waived by Council for devel- tion as trustees of the environment for suc- oping properties in Area A, provided: ceeding generations; 1. The properties are designated to be va- 2. Assure for all people of Washington safe, cated on the Auto Mall Improvement Plan healthful, productive and aesthetically and Map, culturally pleasing surroundings; 2. The application for street vacation con- 3. Attain the widest range of beneficial uses forms to RMC 9-14-11, Administrative Proce- of the environment without degradation, risk dure for Right-of Way Vacations, and to health or safety, or other undesirable and unintended consequences; • 3. The uses proposed conform to subsec- tion C of this Section. (Amd. Ord. 4749, 10- 4. Preserve important historic, cultural and 19-1998) natural aspects of our national heritage; 5. Maintain, wherever possible, an environ- 4-3-050 ENVIRONMENTALLY • • ment which supports diversity and variety of SENSITIVE AREAS: individual choice; A. :PURPOSE OF REGULATIONS: 6. Achieve a balance between population The City, recognizing that man depends on his bi and resource use which will permit high stan- ological and physical surroundings for food, shel- dards of living and a wide sharing of life's ter and other needs, and for cultural enrichment amenities; and as well, and recognizing further the profound im 7 Enhance the quality of renewable re pact of man's activity on the interrelations of all sources and approach the maximum attain components of the natural environment, particu able recycling of depletable resources. larly the profound influences of population growth, high density urbanization, industrial ex- The City recognizes that each person has a pansions, resource utilization and exploitation • fundamental and inalienable right to a health and new and expanding technological advances, ful environment and that each person has a and recognizing further the critical importance of responsibility to contribute to the preservation • restoring and maintaining environmental quality to the overall welfare and development of man, and enhancement of the environment. • declares that it is the continuing policy of the City, in cooperation with Federal, State and other local B. MAPS DEPICTING governments and in cooperation with other con ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS cerned public and private organizations,to use all AND SENSITIVE AREA DESIGNATION: practicable means and measures in a manner calculated to foster and promote the general wel- 1. Maps Adopted by Reference: The fare. to create and maintain conditions under map(s) under Ordinance No. 3891 designate which man and nature can exist in productive har- the location of environmentally sensitive ar- mony. and fulfill the social, economic and other eas within the City and are adopted by refer requirements of present and future generations of ence.These include greenbelts designated in Washington citizens. the Comprehensive Plan, conservancy and. natural environments of the Shoreline Master In order to carry out the policy set forth in this Sec- Program and the one hundred (100) year tion,it is the continuing•responsibility of the City to floodway mapped under the Federal Flood use all practicable means, consistent with other Insurance Program. (Ord. 3891, 2-25-1985) essential considerations of State and City poli- cies,to improve and coordinate plans, functions, 2. Sensitive Areas Designated:Wetlands as mapped and identified in the City Critical 3 - 8.1 (Revised 1/99) 4.G1NA�* CIVIL ENGINEERING,LAND PLANNING,SURVEYING,ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES no u November 5, 1999 ysa / y2 Peter Rosen ("AT( OF City of Renton Development Services Department ti n U i) 19 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 RECEIVED ED RE: Site Plan Approval/SEPA/Variance for the Home Depot Project Grady Way and Talbot Road,Renton,Washington Our Job No. 6254 Dear Peter: On behalf of Home Depot U.S.A.,Inc.,we are pleased to submit the complete application for site plan approval, variance, and SEPA environmental review for the proposed Home Depot facility in Renton,Washington. As required by the City of Renton,we are submitting the following application materials: 1. Master Application(1 original,plus 11 copies). 2. SEPA Environmental Checklist(12 copies). 3. Title Report(3 copies). 4. Mailing labels(2 sets of self-adhesive mailing labels)for all property owners within 300 feet of the subject property boundaries. 5. List of surrounding property owners (2 copies). This list is signed and notarized on the"List of Surrounding Property Owners"form. 6. One check made payable to the City of Renton to cover site plan review, variance, SEPA environmental review,and first class postage for the mailing labels.- 7. Pre-Application Meeting Summary(5 copies). 8. Project Narrative(12 copies). 9. Construction Mitigation Description(5 copies). 10. Neighborhood Detail Map (12 copies). 11. Site Plan(12 copies). 12. Architectural Elevations(12 copies). 13. Grading and Storm Drainage Plan(12 copies). 14. Preliminary Utilities Plan(5 copies). 15. Technical Information Report(4 copies). 16. Geotechnical Engineering Report by GeoEngineers,Inc.,dated October 15, 1999 (5 copies). 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT,WA 98032 (425)251-6222 (425)251-8782 FAX www.barghausen.com it I -- Peter Rosen City of Renton Development Services Department -2- November 5, 1999 17. Wetland Delineation Report by NRC (Natural Resource Consulting), dated September 1999, (12 copies). 18. Landscape Plan by Weisman Design Group(5 sets of the plan set). 19. Floor Plans (5 copies). 20. Tree Cutting/Land Clearing(tree inventory)Plan(4 copies). 21. Traffic Impact Analysis by The Transpo Group,Inc. (5 copies). 22. Plan reductions(8 1/2 by 11-inch PMT reduction)of the Architectural Elevations,Landscape Plan, Utility Plan, Site Plan,and Neighborhood Detail Map. 23. Colored display maps and colored architectural rending by Greenberg Farrow Architecture,Inc. 24. Variance request including project narrative, and justification for variance (10 copies) for the alteration(clearing/grading)of a small area with slopes over 40 percent. Please notify me of your technical completeness schedule and anticipated dates for the Environmental Review Committee meeting and Hearing Examiner public hearing. Shouldyouhave any questions or comments regarding the enclosed documents,please contact me at this office. Sincerely, Bruce K. Creager,AI Director of PI ervices BKC/ph/ps 6954C.012 enc: As Noted cc: Jim Lyon,Home Depot U.S.A.,Inc. (w/enc) BrianrEsplen,Home Depot U.S.A.Inc. Michael Okuma, Greenberg Farrow Architecture,Inc. (w/enc) Bob Betts,Robert S. Betts,Inc. (w/enc) Glenn Amster,Lane,Powell,Spears,Lubersky(w/enc) Jeff Schramm,The Transpo Group,Inc. (w/enc) Bob Boyd,Puget Western,Inc. Jay S Grubb,Barghausen Consulting Engineers,Inc. (w/enc) II **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted; 11/05/99 14:16 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9905580 Amount: 2f750 . 00 11/05/99 14 : 15 Payment Method: CHECK Notation;. ##36119 HARGHAUSE Init: LN Project #: LUA99-157 Type: L,UA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 172305-9072 Site Address: 915 S GRADY WY Total Fees; 2, 756 .93 This Payment ; 2, 750 . 00 Tote. ALL Pmts: 2, 756 .93 balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 .345 . 81. 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 000 .345 . 81. 00 . 0017 Site Plan Approval 2, 000 . 00 000 .345 . 81. 00 ; 0019 Variance Fees 250 . 00 **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9905581 Amount; 6 ,93 11/05/99 14 : 16 Payment Method: CHECK Notation; #26815 HARGHAUSE Init: LN Project #: LUA99-157 Type; IAA and Use Actions Parcel No: 172305-9072 Site Address: 915 S GRADY WY Total Fees; 2, 756 .93 This Payment , 6 .93 Total AL, F;tits : 2, 756 .93 Hal.nce: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 05 .519 .90 .42 . 1 Postage 6 .93 • LIIVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION - WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE . • APPLICATIONS : • • B TTAL::<::<:::>::>: :»>W. I. .ED: : .:I C <'<<>>< >`>> < >< :> :::::: �' LAND:;USE>P:ERMIT.SU. .M.I :T... .. :...:..A Y.......::::: .MO:DIFE.. : ::::::::.:::.:.:. :.. :::.: Calculations, Survey, D•rairia e':Gbnt[o� ..n3... .:�.:..:. ::,.:.:::::::::::::.:::.:::.:::::::.. .:.::................:::.:.. ::::::.::::.. ..:..::.:::.::::: :::::::::::::::::... . :. :.:::..:..:.:.:::::::.:.::::::::::::::::.... ....:::...::::::::::.. Drainage ReportF2 Elevatlo *Ii:rcl ite.ct ur al.a N a`>: :: ::i.:: :. >:: :::>>::>:> Elevations, Grading 2 ::::4t.: C::::.:y) <7 > > '> � ; < :<' : > >a . .... Ezistn `Co. eriant :°.(Reco..ded.::..:o : .4...:.:.:.::..::::. :.::.....:::.. ..:.:::.::. ::..:...............:::::::::. :::...............::::::.::::.:.................................::::::::..:: :::::::;:.;.:::. Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) 4 Flod.Pla n M df.. a :.;.:.::::.:�::.:::.::.:::::::::.;:.: :::.;:.;;:::::�::.;:.;:.;::.::.:.::::.;::.:•:.>....;..;::.:;<.;::.;::::.;;::..::::::::::.;....::::::::....:: Floor Plans 3ANDa .. .......... Geote hriical Re ortz Qs >:;::_»> »>""••••::::::,,,, ::::>:: .,.... Grading Plan, Conceptual z Gradjr ::Plari. Detail...d 2... ..... ... .:.:. ..::.::...:......:: King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site 4 Landsca ing:Plan••<Co ep ua,. : :' : : . :„ >............................. <: » >: >` > < < .... >< :> ' > «> <<»< Legal Description 4 Surroundi::>:•....tq ert <'Ownersa List of. urro nd n Pr n Mailing Labels for Property Owners 4 Map.of Existing:Site;Cordition Sa. : . :.;:: . ... . Master Application Form 4 Moniament;Cards.(on p., r m num nl) _, ., Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping • Analysis a Plan eductions'' P T .. ; ` : :`> :: ; <; • Postage 4 , :Letter2 Public Works Approval . plat Certificate 4 D E Title Report or P .:._::... .,. :<:>:::: ::>:;;:>:::<:>;::>:::<:::>:::. <:>: <::<::>:>:>::::>::>:: ;.;:>:;::::;; ;,::,;:.;;:: ::>: LOPMENT PLANNI I .<. :..: .:Y::O P T0 o r a . 5 :co tours s :... ::::::::::::.:.. .. ...:.::::..::...:.:.:: .:.:::.:.:......... 'REN ON P9 P Y P ( ) Traffic Study 2 NOV 0 b 1,99 Tree Cuttin Ne etation Clearin Plana .. .:: : .. :.:..:.: ::: :: . . .:::::;:.:::::::: ,.;:.,;:.::.:::.: ;;::;:: • Utilities Plan, Generalized z �, Deie •• • • . Wetlands Iln at o : a a I M n Wetlands Planting Plan 4 Wetlands Study This requirement may be waived by: // 1. Property.Services Section PROJECT NAME: -7 ,- ,6�910(-- 2. Public Works Plan Review Section // J 3. Building Section - DATE: 60 4. Development Planning Section _ h:ldivision.skdevelop.serldev.plan.inglwaiver.xls - r. • . , . H-1041-01 • cJ r, Poc ) wutp.,:y 7ktj WETLAND DELINEATION Renton Home Depot Renton, Washington September 1999 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON NOV 0 5 1999 RECEIVED Greenberg Farrow Architects, Inc. 15101 Red Hill Avenue, Suite 200 Tustin, California 92780 NRCNATURAL RESOURCE CONSULTING Assessment,Management and Regulatory Permitting P.O.BOX 7208 TACOMA,WASHINGTON 98407 (253)756-0370 FAX: (253)756-0155 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The findings and conclusions presented in this report are based on an interpretation of information currently available to Natural Resource Consulting. This summary is for introductory purposes and should be used only with the full text of this report. This wetland delineation was based on the On-Site Determination Method described in the Washington State Wetland Identification and Delineation Manual(1997) and the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual(1987). Based on the information derived through site reconnaissance and readily available documents wetland was not identified on the property. A concrete lined storm water pond and drainage channel (a Type 4 Water) were identified on the property. The concrete lined drainage channel is considered to be a tributary to Rolling Hills Creek. The area up to the edge of the drainage channel is paved;therefore, the City of Renton Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance code provision, Section 4-9-5:D would not apply to this site. The ordinance indicates that, no tree cutting or land clearing is permitted within twenty- five feet of the ordinary high water mark of a creek. H-1040-01 • TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Scope of Services 1 1.2 Site Location and Description 1 2.0 DOCUMENT REVIEW 2 2.1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory Map 2 2.2 City of Renton Wetland Inventory Map 2 2.3 Soils Information 2 3.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE 2 3.1 Site Conditions During Site Visit 2 3.2 Topography 2 3.3 Fauna 2 3.4 Vegetation 3 3.5 Soils 3 3.6 Hydrology 3 4.0 REGULATION OF THE DRAINAGE CHANNEL 3 5.0 CONCLUSIONS 4 6.0 CLOSURE 4 REFERENCES 5 LIST OF TABLES Table No. - 1 Vegetation Species Identified On the Site LIST OF FIGURES Figure No. 1 Vicinity Map 2 Site Map APPENDIX DEFINITION OF PLANT INDICATOR STATUS AND FIELD SHEETS ii H-1040-01 WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT RENTON HOME DEPOT PROJECT RENTON, WASHINGTON 1.0 INTRODUCTION Natural Resource Consulting has completed a wetland delineation for the Renton Home Depot Project located north of the power line easement with the large towers, south of Grady Way, east of Talbot Road (S.R. 515), and west of Benson Road South in Renton, Washington(Figure 1). We understand that an agreement to construct some parking under the power lines within the easement is proposed; therefore, the area under the power lines was also evaluated for this project, and is considered part of the site. Wetlands were not identified on or within 100 feet of the site. A concrete lined drainage channel is considered to be a tributary to Rolling Hills Creek. The detailed result of our investigation on the Renton Home Depot Site are included in this report. This work was performed to assist in site planning related to development of the property. 1.1 Scope of Services The scope of work for this study was limited to the following tasks: • Review of federal, state and local regulations pertaining to the subject site. The review was used to classify the on-site drainage and identify potential buffers. • A visual assessment to observe existing site conditions. This was accomplished using field procedures consistent with the Washington State Wetland Identification and Delineation Manual(1997) and the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual(1987). • A review of documents readily available, including local wetland inventory maps, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory Maps, and soils information. 1.2 Site Location and Description The irregular-shaped parcel contains 10.72 acres of land and is located north of the power line easement with the large towers, south of Grady Way, east of Talbot Road(S.R. 515), and west of Benson Road South in Renton, Washington(Figure 1). Renton City Hall is located directly north of the site. The property is located in the NW 1/4 Section 20 and the SW 1/4 Section 17, Township 23:North, Range 5 East. The northern portion of the site contains gravel and paved lots. A building foundation is being removed from the northwest portion of the site. The eastern boundary of the site contains a sloping hill side covered in shrubs and maple trees. The southeast corner of the site contains the concrete lined storm water pond and concrete lined drainage. 1 H-1040-01 2.0 DOCUMENT REVIEW 2.1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory Map The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory Map of the Renton, Washington Quadrangle, 1:24,000 scale, does not indicate inventoried wetlands on the property. 2.2 City of Renton Wetland Inventory Map A City of Renton Wetland Inventory Map shows that a wetland is located south of the site. The wetland is identified as W-31, and is a Palustrine scrub-shrub, emergent wetland approximately 1 acre is size. This wetland is greater than 100 feet south of Easement A(Figure 2). 2.3 Soils Information The Soils Survey for the King County Area, Washington indicates that the site is mapped as containing Urban Land. Urban Land is soil that has been modified by disturbance of the natural layers with additions of fill material. 3.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE 3.1 Site Conditions During Site Visit On August 31, 1999, a biologist with Natural Resource Consulting visited the subject site to evaluate site conditions. The entire site from the power line easement north was evaluated and wetlands were not identified. The nearest wetland is located greater than 100 feet south of Easement A. A concrete lined storm water pond and concrete lined drainage channel were identified in the southeast portion of the site. The majority of the site contains gravel and paved areas and two buildings. The eastern portion of the site contains forested and shrub vegetation on the slope between Benson Road South and a cyclone fence. 3.2 Topography Based on topographic data provided on the August 16, 1999, site plan topographic relief on the site ranges from approximately 20 feet along paved portion of the site to 52 feet in the eastern portion of the site along Benson Road South. 3.3 Fauna Songbirds and rabbits were observed on the site. Evidence of various animal species on the site was also noted, such as mice and vole trails. No plant or animal species, listed federally or by the state as threatened or endangered, were observed on the site. 2 H-1040-01 3.4 Vegetation Five representative data plots were established in the undeveloped portion of the site to document plant species and dominance of vegetation on the subject property(Figure 2). The vegetative species composition varied from a big leaf maple forest to blackberry thickets. Data forms detailing observations for vegetation are included in the Appendix. 3.5 Soils During the site reconnaissance, soil conditions, including color, texture, and relative moisture content, were observed and recorded at five data points on the undeveloped portion of the site. Soil types observed on the site ranged from gravelly sandy loam to silt loam. We understand that the site contains tailings from a coal mine that once used the site. 3.6 Hydrology Hydrologic conditions, including saturated soils, and indicators of wetland hydrology as defined by the 1987 Manual, were not observed on the site. Water enters the site via two culverts that run under S.R. 405 and Benson Road South. The culverts discharge into a concrete lined pond located on the eastern portion of the site. Water flows, year round, from the pond into a three- foot deep four-foot wide concrete lined channel. Water in the channel during the site visit was approximately three inches deep. South of the site the channel is blocked where a trash rack in the channel is blocked with debris. Water in this portion of the channel is up to two feet deep due to the blockage. 4.0 REGULATION OF THE DRAINAGE CHANNEL The concrete lined storm water pond and concrete lined drainage channel identified in the southeastern portion of the property is considered to be a tributary to Rolling Hills Creek. The Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife(WSDFW)would regulate the drainage channel as a Type 4 Water. WSDFW would regulate alterations or work within the channel. Normally, the City of Renton Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance code provision, Section 4-9-5:D would require that, no tree cutting or land clearing be permitted within twenty-five feet of the ordinary high water mark of a stream. Since the area up to the edge of the drainage channel is paved and no tree cutting or land clearing("The act of removing or destroying trees or groundcover including grubbing of stumps and root mat from any undeveloped lot,partially developed lot, developed lot,public lands or public right-of-way.") is proposed, the City of Renton Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance code provision, Section 4-9-5:D would not apply to this site. At the present time there are no other regulations regarding stream setbacks within the City of Renton. The City of Renton is currently in the process of modifying their sensitive area ordinance and may include stream setbacks in the modified ordinance. 3 H-1040-01 5.0 CONCLUSIONS Based on the Washington State Wetland Identification and Delineation Manual(1997) and the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual(1987), vegetation, soils, and hydrologic conditions necessary for an area to be considered wetland were not found on the property. The nearest wetland to the site is greater than 100 feet south of Easement A. The concrete lined drainage channel located in the southeastern portion of the site is paved up to the edge of the channel and under current City of Renton regulations would not require a setback or buffer. WSDFW would regulate alterations or work within the channel, a Type 4 Water. 6.0 CLOSURE The findings and conclusions documented in this report have been prepared for specific application to this project. They have been developed in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill normally exercised by members of the environmental science profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the area. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are professional opinions based on an interpretation of information currently available to us and are made within the operation scope, budget, and schedule of this project. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. In addition, changes in government codes, regulations, or laws may occur. Because of such changes, our observations and conclusions applicable to this site may need to be revised wholly or in part. NATURAL RESOURCE CONSULTING Theresa R. Henson Natural Resource Ecologist H1040.01.RPT 4 H-1040-01 REFERENCES Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C.Golet, and E.T. LaRoe, 1979, Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Publication FSW/OSB-79/31. Environmental Laboratory, 1987, Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual Technical Report Y-87-1, U.S. Army Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Munsell Soil Color Chart, 1994, Rev. ed.: Baltimore, Maryland, Kollmorgen Instruments Corporation. Reed, P.B., Jr., 1988, National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: Northwest(Region 9), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 88 (26.9). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1994, Public Notice. 1993 Supplement to National Plant List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1981, National Wetland Inventory Map, Renton Quadrangle, Washington. Washington State Department of Ecology, 1997, Washington State Wetland Identification and Delineation Manual, Publication#96-94. 5 H-1040-01 • I TABLE 1 VEGETATION SPECIES IDENTIFIED ON THE SITE TREES Douglas Fir Pseudotsuga menziesii Big Leaf Maple Acer macrophyllum Mountain Ash Sorbus scopulina Red Alder Alnus rubra SHRUBS Black Cottonwood (saplings) Populus balsamifera Himalayan Blackberry Rubus discolor Hazelnut Corylus cornuta Scott's Bloom Cytisus scoparius Canadian Thistle Circium arvense HERBS Bentgrass Agrostis sp. Orchard Grass Dactylis glomerata Reed Canarygrass Phalaris arundinacea Giant Horsetail Equisetum telmatia Pearly Everlasting Anaphalis margaritacea White Clover Trifolium repens Note: This listing represents the major plant species identified. There may be other species present on or within the subject site that are not listed. H-1040-01 r li • $ i34 i i i h 'O . 1 2ND o —1 m 3 3 1W-j1111 3RD Fit ,,,, It,, T ,1 t‘lit ,„,.,,,,,40.4, .. . + 7TH 1111 •1r SITE Gip° KrnA NN RENTON VILLAGE / 16 )tH •ice IR — 16 NIP e.,.,,, H 0S Or I 1 N 7B/1 o ti 9 17TH 19TH PUGET 21ST N Renton Home Depot Approximate Scale 1 inch to 4800 feet A Renton,Washington VICINITY MAP September 1999 H-1040-01 Note:Map adapted from The Thomas Guide, 1995. Natural Resource Consulting FIG. 1 Ammerman!,Maniganent and Regulatory Permitting • • !• I INTER• STATE 405 1 • • • GREENBERG FARROW ARCHITECTURE • _ _- • �� - ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING PLANNING 6 15101 RED HILL AVE....SURE 200 T115T1N,CA 92780 - _ VOILE 714/25 FAX 71 9 -5480 • • • 7,1 -:N. \ ))1i.. !,....: \.-• -`'\``.,:��''•.�` !- t `\ BURNETT AVEN11011 TALBOT RD. • ' . E9 Fell • s' ' • •.:.•.. :..:':F.1...,:':.1....1-4,?,,,,-sii-6.;-.. r-,74.1.,."--4,ii•:;;_z:.• •,..,.. ---....:c., ;,,,,:,,,,, •1...:-..,t- ...,. F stfo • • :r_ I . • - • _ • - Y I Q : .. �.; PROJECT INFORMATION ... . , . ... \` SITE AREA • � =':`:� i•''- \ THE HOME tt.j �� `-r` _� _T.- y' :� E DEPOT 10.72 ACRES . . to " - .r,. • •�`:�i.�—\+ `"'�` • � - —� 4 '/�' °•� > t B\, ? :rr 4 • TOTAL 10.72 ACRES • �:' _ - ^1 `."_ l�O �•� r_ \ • TOTALS - � / �+\ 9Q" ?c �`::.:::.`,'i -`/. � � . RE COVERAGE 28.18R 12,276 SF AC "♦,-� t • �t- Fi. s _O _ _ • • \ BUILDING AREA • • / c` - :S \ THE HOME.0 R- O - .. ..- ,S ., E DEPOT 117 064 SF 131,854. SF .� • • :k � • "...- - � •_-• •ti' .C/� "•y-. - - • F. GARDEN CENTER 14,790 SF - \ •:- '! .. -o v ma..=SAT1 a'c �:- � 7 '^• 5 '1� .-. -?s \, TOTAL I :L. .. I �♦ ♦ PARKING COUNT S i 56 ♦w •"-i SUMMARY • ♦ 16 ` z �� ♦ - - --h. r - _ REQUIRED BY CITY THE HOME DEPOT O 4 100D 527 SPACES _ .: Including GARDEN CENTER 3 -- ',e^ _ .\ - .. a TOT ti F AL REQUIRED.1, 527 SPACES \ 1 c= �' - - PARKING PROM DED�`o I L i. - \Nb%. ~'+ s • ,'�.t 'r'i: - \ q HOME DEPOT: • __ . .-. . _ �� GUSTO �� - .". q, ', • �') �p Q \� CUSTOMER 464 SPACES ♦ 3e, "A} tr '_7 qr•7�J�a •• •t \ \' OM RFLOW 101 SPACES ssioar P � • y• TOTAL PROVIDED 65 SPACES L , •.• '': - .. FRONT FIELD PROVIDED: 419 SPACES - -- 4 e °7• ` , ��w t_` •( - • '• ZONING CLASSIFICATION } • ♦ \ - - • �:t4i• e • /\ `o. ^ �.' ' ;'�,�5':Iq' ; • �� • - EXISTING: IH - HEAVY INDUSTRIAL 1 - � r_ \ �,,-®'`• ♦ j�: r�' _ PROPOSED: C-A COMMERCIAL ARTERIAL { .� ` ,,\, 4� -•_ \ ..- '\�� h'_ :. `��- `• ,I.• R SITE LAviSO REVISION SUMMARY PARKING Al - �: ____ -� �a ri I. - - - ADJACENT PARCEL. ♦ - '---- - erg !. a+.. _ ` .'/ • .. ,• ; . ).,...) 'p.-.: ; 1 -. 2.,' . • • \ _ • �' .__i _ .:.Ij.�~• : _ — -— ---- h'"' . .- PROJECT NOTES • w - -` ,fplf- — ���--- I. THIS CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN IS FOR PLANNING i __ \• w %� / - _ --- /PURPOSES ONLY, SITE SPECIFIC INFORMATION SUCH •` • - • \ • - _ •r _. - - EXISTING CONDITIONS, ZONING, PARKING • • : -� �/ -.-- _ —_�� LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS MUST BE VERIFIED. • `� �; � <;,S y - : .__ L CURB CUTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNALS SHOWN ARE - \ / 2.AL• -• ♦ - 60 - /• .® /. Q' PROPOSED aNU MUST BE VERIFIED. / 3.THIS SITE PLAN IS BASED ON SURVEY GENERATED BY BARGHAUSEN, FROM SHEET 6687TA02.DwG DATED Renton Home Depot - ♦ , DRAWING ISSUE/REVISION RECORD i - j • I ///I \_ ��P"`5 Renton,Washington DATE: 8/16/99 �T MAP SITE DEV. SH ♦ ,/// • 5,.�t. SITE E 171LiC SAPLANNER COORDINATOR M.Ft.E.MAFIKET SOKUMA r e 3 EATTLE a E.AGENDA NAME RENTON • S ' / eptember 1999 H-1040-01 "S Q A TING'C ♦♦` THE HOME DEPOT f .0.'° RENTON, WA • II' WAY&TALBOT ROAD + Data Point Natural Resource Consulting FIG, 2 GFA PROJECT NUMBER 9708e0.0¢ I \ Management and Regulatory permitting seas r•-so P . . . • 1 ♦ E INN' I I I I I . • , - : : ..• • . 0 25 50 100 150 200 I • - WA=y 31 h APPENDIX DEFINITION OF PLANT INDICATOR STATUS AND FIELD DATA FORMS H-1040-01 • APPENDIX DEFINITION OF PLANT INDICATOR STATUS Indicator Category Definitions OBL Obligate Wetland. Occurs almost always (estimated probability>99%) under natural conditions in wetlands. FACW Facultative Wetland. Usually occurs in wetlands(estimated probability 67-99%), but occasionally found in uplands. FAC Facultative. Equally likely to occur in wetlands or uplands (estimated probability 34-66%). FACU Facultative Upland. Usually occurs in uplands (estimated probability 67- 99%), but is occasionally found in wetlands (estimated probability 1-33%). UPL Obligate Upland. Occurs in wetlands in other regions (as defined in the National List of Scientific Plant Names), but occurs almost always (estimated probability>99%)under natural conditions in uplands in the region specified. NI No Indicator. These species have not been given an indicator status. They are assumed to be upland. Source: ' National List of Plants That Occur In Wetlands:Northwest(Region 9). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 88 (26.9). 89 pp. H-1040-01 Data Point: of 5 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION Project/Site: R e r -o Y\ Date: 8 -3 t-91 Applicant/Owner: No("a._ 1D e P 01- City: Re n i-r>0 Investigator: TR ti Job#: N - 10 y O-0 I County: 1 Have vegetatio so' or hydrology been disturbed: Yes No State: t� Is the area a potential Problem Area: Yes (If needed,explain on reverse.) VEGETATION o- Dominant Plant Species Stratum %Cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum %Cover Indicator 1. Rubes d;stator'_5% 512 �F c--bt I. 2. C,It k,5 ,s Scopes-4s Sh 20 API- 2. 3. Dr<<.+y 1;s lonwrv,.t0. 1{ I o Fi4c 3. 4. Aorostl s s?. H to FACtt. 4. • 5. S. 6. 6. 7. 7. Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC(except FAC-). *-Dominant species. Q 20 Cowardin Classification: /0 oh - Remarks: HYDROLOGY Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators `l)(Ng- Stream,Lake,or Tide Gage _Aerial Photograph Inundated _Other Saturated in Upper 12 Inches �No Recorded Data Available Water Marks Water Lines Sediment Deposits Field Observations: Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Oxidized Root Channels in Upper Depth of Surface Water: (in.) 12 Inches Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) Local Soil Survey Data Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: 1 Data Point. I of S SOILS Map Unit Name: Lk r-b et- VA Drainage Class: Field Observations , Taxonomy(Subgroup): - - Confirm Mapped Type? m No cs:1 I Profile Description; Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture,Concretions, (inches) (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) AbandanizeLcontrast Rhizospheres.etc. O —2. 1 0 ki R.2)2 S ; 1 -1- loam ' 2- 11. lO f R 3J2 G-rn.utli S &n lac&r,, Wjeau. 1 Y Hydric Soil Indicators: hi v ek.c. Histosol Concretions Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking Probable Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chrome Colors Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes Hydric Soils Present? Yes Is this Data Point Within a Wetland? Yes o Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Remarks: • 2-97/DATA.FRMlrRH-trh Data Point: 2 of S DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION ' Project/Site: g e n tO n Date: ''-3 i -99 Applicant/Owner: 40 n 'be P ort City: R.e ri to Di Investigator: TR U Job#: 11 - la 4 0-o 1 County: l< n State: WA Have vegetation, soils or hydrology been disturbed: Is the area a potential Problem Area: Yes (If needed,explain on reverse — __. _ - —._ VEGETATION r Dominant Plant Species Sin= %Cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum %Cover Indicator 1. A ,c r- (n&c tieK111K0n T $Z) FAc.u. I. 2. Co(-y%vvS Curn`x}`� Sit 3o FAcv.. 2. 3. Rul,..s di'scai.r SA 50 Ffc.u._ 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. 6. 6. 7. 7. l8._ 8. . . _ _ _ Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC(except FAC-). *-Dominant species. -e' ?o i Cowardin Classification: l000 —Lei e.kto.n 4 Remarks: HYDROLOGY _ Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators 1J r)rt.ks _Stream,Lake,or Tide Gage Aerial Photograph Inundated . _Other Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ✓No Recorded Data Available Water Marks Water Lines Sediment Deposits . Field Observations: 0 UNNt__ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Oxidized Root Channels in Upper Depth of Surface Water: (in.) 12 Inches Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) Local Soil Survey Data , Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: . .. ... Data Point: 2 of 5 SOILS Map Unit Name: I. .fib a Ell Drainage Class: Field Observations Taxonomy(Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? 4 No �c.-1I Profile Description: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture,Concretions, (inches) (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moistl QliandagceL('Antract Ithizospheres,etc. 0-3 '101 (2-3/2. s . Ii- ) rr 3- 11. )v Y 2 3/3 r„?,1.1: G mu/tit,'u Su.n cz�l Irr) ,o 'lc- 3J2 ' e1Lkis .� '� _ Hydric Soil Indicators: tiVv_ Histosol Concretions Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking Probable Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chrome Colors Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes o i Hydric Soils Present? Yes Is this Data Point Within a Wetland? Yes Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (N5) Remarks: 2-97/DATA.FRM/TRH-trh Data Point: 3 of 5 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION Project/Site: Rt 0+0 n Date: $-31-77 Applicant/Owner: Hit rite_ cQc)i- City: Re filor i Investigator: Y! 1} Job#: F+—t^yv—°I County: State: i.✓y4 Have vegetation,soils,or hydrology been disturbed: Yes Is the area a potential Problem Area: Yes `o f needed,e I lain on reverse. VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species atm= %Cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum %Cover Indicator 1.Acet- Ma_croph.yIh&M T ' o FRc Itt 1. 2, tZukb ws A:srolor- FAC IA. 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. 6. 6. 7._ 7. 8. 8. Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC(except FAC-). *-Dominant species. _8'�� Cowardin Classification: N a n- 'rtA Remarks: HYDROLOGY Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators Pc vl.& e _Stream,Lake,or Tide Gage Aerial Photograph Inundated Other Saturated in Upper 12 Inches jiislo Recorded Data Available Water Marks Water Lines • u � Sediment Deposits Field Observations: Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Oxidized Root Channels in Upper Depth of Surface Water: (in.) 12 Inches Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) Local Soil Survey Data Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: . fir. Data Point: 3 of 5 SOILS Map Unit Name: Lk t— cx-Y\ Drainage Class: Field Observations Taxonomy(Subgroup): - Confirm Mapped Type? en, No Profile Description: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, finchesl £Munsell Moistl IMunsell Moisti AttlliKbpsvicppirag Rhizospheres.etc. 0-3 jpl23l2_ — 5; /oc.nri 3-12 loy2 9/3 �•�Kn, ,.J/fir ue I Hydric Soil Indicators: Ai v A_ Histosol Concretions Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking Probable Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other(Explain in Remarks) I ' Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes CgDo Hydric Soils Present? Yes ® Is this Data Point Within a Wetland? Yes CT).i Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (go`) Remarks: 2-97/DATAFRM/FRH-trh Data Point: ' of DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION Project/Site: 2t rat r, Date: 8°-3 t-9? Applicant/Owner: ko rvu e f o't' City: R�n ► Investigator i t4 Job#: H-I o't 0-o l County: 1c Have v tion,sot or hydrology State: v✓� egeta � ydro ogy been disturbed: ��► No Is the area a po Problem Area: Yes .11.011 (If needed,explain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Specie& alit= %Cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum %Cover Indicator 1. Cyt:sKs s(ofici-r�% h 30 uPL. 1. 2. C; r c a.rJrnse- Si, 10 FMFC u. 2. 3. R f-o s ,.°s c, . t+ FRc.Lt. 3. 4.0.. . 1;s 5iays.&nag- t'{ 30 Pr °Ll 4. 5.1 y.St+use) H 10 Ft4cL) 5. 6. I;,.tnt reee ns 14 20 ipRc_t,. 6. ; 7. 7. 8• .-_-.' ._ 8. Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC(except FAC-). *-Dominant species. 1? Cowardin Classification: Nan - w +10.n Remarks: HYDROLOGY _ Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators _Stream,Lake,or Tide Gage _Aerial Photograph y Inundated Other — Saturated in Upper 12 Inches No Recorded Data Available Water Marks Water Lines Sediment Deposits Field Observations: f�1 O Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Oxidized Root Channels in Upper Depth of Surface Water. (in.) 12 Inches Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) Local Soil Survey Data Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: Data Point: 'l of 5 SOILS Map Unit Name: LA-t-10 at1 Drainage Class: Field Observations Taxonomy(Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? No -el'1) Profile Description: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, { finches) WMunsell Moist) flquasell Moist) Marndansricstagag Rbizo pheres.etc. 0 -12 IDYL 3/2 - G,a.uell Surd] omrr) 1 Hydric Soil Indicators: h)J we__ • Histosol — Concretions Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer Sulfidic Odor 1_ Organic Streaking Probable Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes Hydric Soils Present? Yes o Is this Data Point Within a Wetland? Yes 6 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Remarks: 2-97/DATAFRM/rRH-trh Data Point: 5 of 5 • DATA FORM • ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION Project/Site: Re n1 Dn Date: 3)-71 Applicant/Owner: 1fom0, D e Port- City: i�c n to r) Investigator: Ti i- Job#: 11--1 a 40-a 1 County: K;n Have vegetati. . soi, or hydrology been disturbed: ® No State: - Is the area a potential Problem Area: Yes i�. (If needed,explain on reverse.) , VEGETATION l Dominant Plant SneciCE Stratum %Cover Jntlicat I Dominant Plant Species Stratum %Cover Indicator I.Cy 4,A w s S 4 a pa-r;KS 2 a t.A PL 1. 1 2. R.+.bV•s itasco lot' sh $o FRC.Lk 2. 3. 3. I 4. 4. S. S. 6. 6. 7. 7. 8. ., _. _.�_ . �. 8. Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC(except FAC-). *-Dominant species. _ ,Q Cowardin Classification: Noel- W e�4-1c&n 01 1 ' Remarks: ( HYDROLOGY _ Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators Ne.) Stream,Lake,or Tide Gage —Aerial Photograph Inundated / —Other Saturated in Upper 12 Inches v No Recorded Data Available Water Marks Water Lines Sediment Deposits Field Observations: A)D AiZ Drainage p� in Wetlands Oxidized Root Channels in Upper Depth of Surface Water: (in.) 12 Inches Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) Local Soil Survey Data Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: Data Point:5of 5 I SO Map Unit Name: ur" Drainage Class: Field Observations Taxonomy(Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? (r eD No profile Description; Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle . Texture,Concretions, (inches? (Munsell Moist) fMunsell Moist) Rhizesae_rec-etC. 3 � o- 12 I012 y!3 ra.AclN Surtic� idcr►? Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol Concretions Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking Probable Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes Hydric Soils Present? Yes f-e' Is this Data Point Within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes lie:' Remarks: • 1-97/DATAFRM/TRH-trh • First American Title Insurance Company Regional Commercial Division 2101 4th Avenue, Suite 800 Seattle, Washington 98121 • (206) 728-0400 / Fax (206) 448-6248 Toll Free 1-800-826-7718 Order No. 398616-5K REF: 25138 COMMERCIAL TITLE OFFICER: LANCE LEWIS PHONE: (206) 615-3257 COMMERCIAL TITLE OFFICER:. MIKE N. COOPER PHONE: (206) .728-7229 COMMERCIAL TITLE OFFICER: SHARON CROASDILL PHONE: (206) 728-7227 FAX .NO. : (206) 448-6248 THIRD REPORT SCHEDULE A 1 . Effective date: SEPTEMBER *13, 1999 at 7 :30 A.M. 2 . Owners proposed insured: HOME DEPOT U.S.A. , INC. , A DELAWARE CORPORATION 3 . *Policy/policies to be issued: Amount Premium Tax Extended Owner's Coverage $ 6,100, 000. 00 STANDARD PORTION $8, 800.00 $756. 80 EXTENDED PORTION $2, 640 . 00 $227. 04 4 . A fee simple interest in the land described in this commitment is vested, at the Commitment date in: PUGET WESTERN, INC. , A WASHINGTON CORPORATION 5 . The land referred to in this commitment is described in Schedule A-2 . 6 . ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Blocks 1-2, WALSWORTH'S 1ST ADD. , Vol. 6, P. 23 and - Sections 17, 19 & 20 Township 23N Range 5E. 7 . Tax Account No (s) . : 915460-0010-00 • n.T 4S; • " Ix' Page 2 N`J'v'. 04 ' 99 (THU) 17:01 RADFORD BETTS • 425 455 1 258 PAGE. 1/ 1 OCT=20-1999 13:08 425 487 6565 P.02/02 SUPPLEMENTAL NO. 1 OF THIRD REPORT 0 Aloof, FILE P -DPY • • .First AmericanEdeIns'uzauce Company 46 REGIONAL commmarat DIVISION 2101 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITS 800• * SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98121-9977 COMMERCIAL TITLE OFFICER: MIKE N. COOPER PHONE: (206) 728-7229 COMMERCIAL TITLE OFFICER: LANCE LEWIS PHONE: (206) 615-3257 COMMERCIAL TITLE OFFICER: SHARON .C'ROASDILL PHONE: (206) 728-7227 . FAX NO. : (206) 448-6248 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT OUR ORDER NO. 398616 YOUR LOAN/ESCROW NO. 25138 TO: FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY NATIONAL DIVISION - • • 2101 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 700 • SEATTLE, WA 98121 ATTN: MELISSA WOLFE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION AFFECTS THE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY COVERED BY OUR REPORT, BUT IS NOT INTENDED TO REPRESENT A COMPLETE REPORT TO DATE: A. PARAGRAPH NO(S) . 7, 8 AND 9 OF OUR REPORT HAVE BEEN DELETED. . • • DATED: OCTOBER 18, 1999 AT 8:00 A.M. gig 161"1 TITLE OFFICER • • Post-its Fax Note 7671 Date*// Pa9 5►/ I LOP►��5 PLANNING To From r'•��`!'r `7 C)TY OF'TPWTORI CoJDept�, Co. r {�2 �0-yale - • NO Y 0 5 1999 Phone# � Phone# Fax# Fax#• RECEIVE* • • TOTAL P.02 .... nn iarcn% 4 n.cc P!AL,fLfUNT CAT ON No:19 PAGE. 2 SCHEDULE A2 Order No. 398616-5K DESCRIPTION: ALL THOSE PORTIONS OF BLOCKS 1 AND 2, INCLUDING THE UNNUMBERED TRACTS ADJOINING THE LOTS IN BLOCK 1 OF WALSWORTH' S FIRST ADDITION TO RENTON, ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 6 OF PLATS AT PAGE (S) 23, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING SOUTHERLY OF SOUTH GRADY WAY AND NORTHEASTERLY OF TALBOT ROAD SOUTH; TOGETHER WITH THOSE PORTIONS OF BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH AND - SOUTH 8TH AVENUE VACATED BY CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE NO. 2850, WHICH ATTACHED THERETO BY OPERATION OF LAW. TOGETHER WITH REVISED PARCEL "D" OF CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LUA-98-164-LLA AS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 9812109014, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THEREFROM THE WESTERLY 150 FEET OF THE ABOVE- DESCRIBED PARCELS ADJACENT TO SR-515 (TALBOT ROAD) ; ALSO EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF EASEMENT "A" AS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 9812171951, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Page 3 • SCHEDULE B - SECTION 1 Order No. 398616-5K • Requirements The following requirements must be met: . '1. • . Payment to or for the account of the Grantors or Mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. 2. Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record. Conditions and Stipulations • 1. The term "mortgage", when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. • 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, • adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate, interest or mortgage thereon covered by. this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose • such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company • at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall . not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good • • • faith (a) to comply with the requirements Hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in • • Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate of interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the Insuring provisions, exclusion from coverage, and the Conditions and Stipulations of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby • • incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, and which arises out of the status of the title to the estate, interest or the lien of the insured mortgage covered hereby or any action asserting such claim, shall be restricted to the provisions and Conditions and Stipulations of this Commitment. NOTE: Effective January 1, 1997, and pursuant to amenxinent of Washington State statutes relating to standardization of recorded documents, the following format and content requirements must be met. Failure to comply may result in rejection of the document by the recorder. • FORMAT: Margins to be 3" on top of first page, 1" on sides and bottom, 1" on top, sides and bottom of each succeeding page. Font size of 8 points or larger and paper size of no more than 8 1/2" by 14". • No attachments on pages such as stapled or taped notary seals; pressure seals must be smudged. INFORMATION WHICH MUST APPEAR ON THE FIRST PAGE: Title or titles of document. If assignment or reconveyance reference to Auditor's File Number of subject deed of trust. Names of grantor(s) and grantee(s) with reference to additional names on following page(s), if any. • Abbreviated legal description (lot, block, plat name or•section, township, range and quarter section of quarter section for unplatted). Assessor's Tax Parcel Number(s). Return address, which may appear in the upper left hand 3" top Margin. • Page 4 SCHEDULE B - SECTION 2 Order No. 398616-5K General Exceptions The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed. of to the satisfaction of the Company. A. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records . B. ' Any facts, rights, interest, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof .C. Easements, claims of easements or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records . D. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in ' area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct ' survey would disclose, and which are not shown by public records . E. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) Reservations or exceptions in patents or In acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) Water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a) , (b) , or (c) are shown by the public records; (d) Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or , aboriginal rights, including easements or equitable servitudes . F. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records . G. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance, construction, tap or reimbursement charges/costs for sewer, water, garbage or electricity. H. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate, interest or 'mortgages thereon covered by this commitment . Page 5 .t • SCHEDULE B - SECTION 2 CONT. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS Order No. 398616-5K 1 . LIEN OF THE REAL ESTATE EXCISE SALES TAX AND SURCHARGE UPON ANY SALE OF SAID PREMISES, IF UNPAID. AS OF THE DATE HEREIN, THE EXCISE TAX RATE FOR CITY OF RENTON IS 1.78%. LEVY CODE: 2110 2 . GENERAL TAXES . THE SECOND HALF BECOMES DELINQUENT AFTER OCTOBER 31ST. YEAR: 1999 AMOUNT BILLED: $141,083 .05 AMOUNT PAID: $70,541.53 AMOUNT DUE: $70,541.52, PLUS INTEREST AND PENALTY, IF DELINQUENT TAX ACCOUNT NO. : 915460-0010-00 TAX ACCOUNT NO. : 972500-0751-06 (OPERATING ACCOUNT) (SAID AMOUNTS ARE FOR THE OPERATING ACCOUNT AND INCLUDES OTHER PROPERTY) NOTE A: DELETED NOTE B: DELETED NOTE C: DELETED 3 . DELETED 4 . UNRECORDED LEASEHOLDS, IF ANY, RIGHTS OF VENDORS AND SECURITY AGREEMENTS ON PERSONAL PROPERTY, AND RIGHTS OF TENANTS AND SECURED PARTIES TO REMOVE TRADE FIXTURES AT THE EXPIRATION OF THE TERM. 5 . MATTERS OF EXTENDED OWNER/PURCHASER COVERAGE WHICH ARE DEPENDENT UPON AN INSPECTION AND AN ALTA SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY FOR DETERMINATION OF INSURABILITY. PLEASE SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ALTA SURVEY AT YOUR EARLIEST CONVENIENCE FOR REVIEW. OUR INSPECTION WILL BE HELD PENDING OUR REVIEW OF THE ALTA SURVEY AND THE RESULTS OF SAID INSPECTION WILL BE FURNISHED BY SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT. 6 . • RIGHT TO MAKE NECESSARY SLOPES FOR CUTS OR FILLS UPON SAID PREMISES FOR J. F. BENSON ROAD REVISION AS GRANTED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 2827715 . (CONTINUED) Page 6 Order No. 398616-5K 7 . RELINQUISHMENT OF ALL EXISTING AND FUTURE RIGHTS TO LIGHT, VIEW AND AIR, TOGETHER WITH RIGHTS OF ACCESS TO AND FROM THE STATE HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTED ON LANDS CONVEYED BY INSTRUMENT•: RECORDED: JULY 23, 1958 RECORDING NO. : 4924770 IN FAVOR OF: THE STATE OF WASHINGTON 8 . RELINQUISHMENT OF ALL EXISTING AND FUTURE RIGHTS TO LIGHT, VIEW AND AIR, TOGETHER WITH RIGHTS OF ACCESS TO AND FROM THE STATE HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTED ON LANDS CONVEYED BY INSTRUMENT: RECORDED: MAY 6, 1964 . RECORDING NO. : 5732439 IN FAVOR OF: THE STATE OF WASHINGTON 9 . CONDEMNATION OF ACCESS TO STATE HIGHWAY AND RIGHT TO MAKE NECESSARY SLOPES FOR CUTS OR FILLS AS CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 761065 . 10 . EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: RECORDED: APRIL 21, 1965 RECORDING NO. : 5937434 IN FAVOR OF: CITY OF RENTON FOR: SANITARY SEWER TRUNK LINE AFFECTS : REFER TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR THE EXACT LOCATION 11 . DELETED 12 . DELETED 13 . TERMS, COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AS CONTAINED IN RECORDED LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT (BOUNDARY LINE REVISION) : RECORDED: DECEMBER 10, 1998 RECORDING NO. : 9812109014 14 . EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: RECORDED: DECEMBER 17, 1998 RECORDING NO. : 9812171951 IN FAVOR OF: PUGET SOUND ENERGY, INC. , A WASHINGTON CORPORATION FOR: ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION AND/OR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AFFECTS : AS DESCRIBED THEREIN 15 . DELETED. (CONTINUED) Page 7 Order No. 398616-5K NOTE A: THE FORTHCOMING TRANSACTION MAY REQUIRE COMPLIANCE WITH RCW 58..17 (SUBDIVISIONS) AND WITH ANY COUNTY OR MUNICIPAL SUBDIVISION CODES OR ORDINANCES . THIS MATTER IS EXPRESSLY EXCLUDED FROM COVERAGE ON THE FORTHCOMING POLICY(IES) PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH 1 (A) OF THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE. NOTES : A. A fee will be charged upon the cancellation of this commitment pursuant to the Washington State Insurance Code and the filed Rate Schedule of the Company. B. An abbreviated legal description is required by the _ County Auditor if the full legal description IS NOT contained on the first page of all documents to be recorded. DS/e;jh • Page 8 • .. . • , . ' NOTICE _.' .... ORDER NO. 398/0 /C) SUBDIVISION Auto_Acc f 1..ausimokr14 1 Pr Alba/ This Sketch is furnished as a courtesy only by First American RCDG NO./VOL & PG. roc- (-/ Pc.23 , Title Insurance Company and it is WI a part of any title OTFI_ SEC 11 icti20 TWNSHP aBIJ RNP...5: N -..1—i commitment or policy of title insurance. This sketch is furnished solely for the.purpose of assisting in locating the premises and does not purport to show all highways, T.. lg.. . .... roads,or casements affecting the property. No reliance should , W E be placed upon this skerch for the location or dimensions of the [ . [ • property and no liability is assumed for the correctness thereof. - . s b N.. %.'• t u / • .. • • • A.&retie I. • : A..UN ., • ' . i.:111 • ,t r mar'sr r ce14112tut ... / • i : 111.10' P.013•41if-2A-31 • • : ••,.• 4 h•:. sa,..,• .. -truly' i / t. it -• 1 •• •.am : S.AV ; ./04 •...AA" ea „" 071 CI 00.10. • 030610n/Om.11 • : It. Lii, 4).• i WAD ISM r • a • / 1,9. -1: 1 ` •:.• 0 6 h• e-.• = ,_ • ,-.14 ?i\ k tt • i • 0 -. -« ---' - :0 J I es is'sr r CO • , W 1010 Wm --......Pilf. ' '-' ../•.'" j3": c . _ 101,101 I ••• I warm-r r . . sasi,m.____t 0 ala.if Or 1000.6 • t orea- " . t ;V' • -4-‘ • a Rod.0 Mr /606../111 0 . CAI( A ' Vt, izi1;;C" 1 :C- . A • CoSIIG IR ! • I X I N9 • \e\t‘ el, . . • \ . • • Zr .c. ,/........: • . .. r WI••\ • r * • • '....7. •••:•:: .•• •'•.. '.::.::•'..:....?•:`::..;-...7 . :• . 1 e 0.• ••• •. .. ..••• , - .• ' , tt„. i .Z • scc bra - rill 1 -•...••.... 4 .1-ird.5 r. . . . . . •• - . \ .6e;'• c ' . 4, , • s • wc.w.o . 4- . 002:5811er•\ • q:$.. k . ' • unni I IP \ \ ,:•.:/i • - •• .:,' S. \' • • KIES Par •G• \ • s . • . I MI toi 1 if. . \ / ,A • — 7 • -- . -7-W-7L (s9 \ -'1 •.6 , • o • . , 4. '' • . . . . 15 . 0 "S \ ' •• • •/ • it sr:writ.t • • • ... e\ . '•.- • !se? . / • . t - . . ...,. • k • 1 II". r kg I . • n , • • • • \ :111A or / .... 1111=1111111 • • i.b ...P. , II .1••=7... ri7111MIE3 I • . • A CO• • I U .1.177-"...361111=a-KO 2 • -4 Q i •• 6.4•rmr-r-",..mecl:3 ' • u -.11111MINIEM3 g 4 ' ' 4'4.13:; . •If''tr .4. / • . . u .rtn-r,;minim I , -• u 1•77117M111 -213 •Z' • u Mr.nril-,,,IIIINCE3 i e : ? i 1. / 1 • • k- • • - . . •• .U 1.7777--,..1=15=1 . 12 ,1K1771.•01.11111-illl / e i a • ....iNIMIE] / i 1 • , / 14 IN' T'ilIMINTIE'l I t, • / k . .,r . , I , • tt• . . • , •.. • • - . . -- — ii=senvi.... ma I t iely,, A . . • ...• •4131i=111M1/77.. 71111.111ran . ....... .. .-. ..........-- • • ... . 44.73 iii=i1M72773innaEi : . ..• .. 7 b. 4 31 4 KinailiMin7-...16M1r= . 7 irrn lir"-..,,,M MIME] A rim= "PrO 0 4, . • mai NIZEDIMMTMIIMICE1 k i&c•zar I 4.. .• Inammorrr--•-. -....•gam= . u• / • ••_•Kaznimar---,•,..qam....m I r ...a... I . • . EIC11=1111W7Trii=CM • •11a11:1 .1=7.1-T, a Iii1MCMI .,.I war.-r . • • • ' ..j • • .:1 . . .:. . Hsi IIEMII MEM : . I sot • I . . - ':,...,',.f,:*-44t.,:iT...?.•,?•••4:::•:-•;;;.1/4:7,.4'?.V:if6:31 4.e. 7 I .. . Jr. C i . 4 - l• .. t ..• , ' , J • . i to ' . rt fr.*.ys ,ra:N • • • • i I I • . . • • LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT LUA-98-164-LLA • 11113•030-0171 A PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 17.THE NE 1/4.OF SECTION 19,AND THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 20 ALL IN TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,RANGE 5 EAST,W.M. CITY OF RENTON,KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON . EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS .ARCH A DECLARATION IHAI►OtION OF GMERNA(NI LOT 10 N THE SOUINMCST OWR1ER or SECTION 17. PARCEL tit • ro.1.5w 23 IORIH,RAr.C(5 GP..0,II OK COYNI7,wASHNGTON.CUOMO AS THE.ITT(*0 WN(D_CORPORAONT DECLARES THAT TINS LOT NNE ATT*151 FNI IS WOE rOLOR. ALE TMI POINDN a 1M PUG[7 ISO (K ..A,( (f0111[R 1 PUftl SO.D POKR*TOO Mn f15 FRCS NLL AND CONSENT ANO 6 TNC CRANK pC OOT Of ITS R61[S'10 AOau51 • - k Ur-NT EOLPANI)S0'5OTON NO I ANr7 2 TRANSL6SON WE CORRIOT. N THE M PROPENiS WES AS LOAM KRUM.NO DECLARES IMi IT 6 IRE FIE WALL O.NCR BEGNNv10 AT A PORN ICON 6 AU a RR EAST a THE SOUIW.EST CORNER OF M NORDIMST QUARTER OF SCOOT 70.10R11S,1P 25 Num.*000 RAND 5 UST•R N,IN OF THE LOOS SMONTT NIKON. SQUMRESI NORTH TIER Or THE SOUDMST QUARTER a SAD SECTION 17: XRIG COIRITT,RA51.10TON,LING R(SRRIy{JF 6ENSON ROAD SOUTH THENCE NOIIH ISO![R. NOD WESTERN.WC.57.3 f[ • ( • I inK(U,(STR. A RASWNGION CORPORATION. MINCE FORM TO THESOUTHERLY LAC Or SOWN COOT RAT: PARCEL 03. • K[IN SCRANKSILRIT NONE SO ROM 10 DR SOUTH lot Or SNO SOUOO WATER .ER WPC(EAST 10 TM PONY OF B[GNNAIO. A19 • PARCEL■ 11W PORTION TOt • N GOYCN1 LOTS I NyO 2.SECTION 20.10RN51.P 23 NORM /_i,,, RANGE S EAST.I U..N TING COURT.RAS%.IGTON LYNG RESICRt,NO NORI.1(1441 I 190O THAI PORION Of THE NORTHEAST OMRRR Or THE 1QRTN(AST OWRTER or SECTION or PROW/STATE 10GHRAY NO I.AS COhvf0D 10 TO STATE OF 1AA511NGTON Br ID.10R051Y 23 MOURN,RANGE 5 EAST.TM..N MC COUNTY.RASA.10101.LYNG DEWS RRD(ICOD UNDER RECORONG POD.5A32439 AND A921770, AROMA SOUTHERLY Or THE SOUNN LINE OF wALS.ORTH'S FIRST ADDITION 10 RENTON. - ACCORONG TO IK PUT THEREOF R(CO0(D N 70UMC{OF PLATS.PAGE 22.MOOS EOM PORTIONS 11[RIa LING M71W BENSON ROAD SOutlt OF TRAG COUNTY.145HNGION,AND EASTERLY OF TOE EASTCRtY UHT OF TALBOT ROM SOUTH AND EOM ANT PORTON THERIO LYING(ASTRLI OF DOTSON ROM 50019 • PARCEL 0 AND MEP!ANT PORLON THERE«LYNG WHAT 11[R1GR 500D ENERGY.PC. ACKNOWLEDGMENT THAT PORTION Or GOYERNN(M LOT 10.SECTION I7.10ANS/IP 23 NORM,RANG(5 ( LINE POTTER k LICIT COURANT)SMRTLEWN NO.1 AND 2 • IASI.N.L.RI RNG COMRY..A511NOION,AHD a COKRNYCNT LOT I.STOOL 20. TIONSINSSON 10wNSMP 2a9*ORM.RANGE 5 UST.■Y.IN MO CQU11TT.WASNN1TON,DESCRIBED _MPH_ Of THE_' STATE a RASN110rOX )SS N As MOONS INC..• (IORYEIRY PLOP SOUND POR[PORTION MIMI' �k Won CO147N47)5107(TLOION�M I ALIT 2 CON(I7 a RRO ) 000010 G ON TNT NORM LIRE Or SO G0v(RNLINT LOT I AT A PONT 526A0 RR IRANSNISON LUTE COMM KST Cr TALI NORTHEAST CORNER OF SOD OOWON)EN1 LOT 1: I CERTIFY THAT I KNOW OR Amur SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE THIT R B BOYD !HENCE NORTH 53.00 RR: NO(7CLPT ANT►ORDON OCELOT U16 SMOOTY OF TIC r01.10AN4 COMM INE: IS THE PERSON WHO APPEMEO BEFORE 11E,AND SAID PERSON SCKNO LEDOEO THENCE WEST PA0AL1(L RIN THE SOUTH LN(OF SAD GOKRNOENT LOT 10,A • EXECUTEDia NE SIGHED DNS NSiENT 00,ON OATH STATED THAT HE THE AUIIIORYCD TO D61A7!-E Of 737.6 1(01.MORE 011 LESS TO M UST lK Of A IMCi a W1D O(CO[O �� a'TIC NEST LIRE a PO S(CtON 20 A INSTANCE a IIAO/[R SOurN a THE INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOwLEDOED IT AS PRESIDENT 10 PURR SOUND IFUT.NOTE E ON AND P0RIR E0INPAM IN DIED RECORDED LRDIR THE NOIITOST CORNER IIMOOT;CAS OF PUGET WESTERN,INC..TO BE THE FREE AND VDLUNTARY OCT Or SUCH MG COMMIT'MCOR09A 10.917107,INCH LA(6 PARALLEL RIN NO RAS.50 TUT(AST THENCE NOMN 9W aY A1-EAST.219.91 TER.LORE OA LESS.TO INE wESTERLT PARTY F C USES AND►►►UUU,,RRRgSES INEN ON[D N M MTRUOENT. OF TM WEST LIRE a SW 5(CIOr6 17 MO 20: UK a COUNh ROM NO m A/0 M i[RRANuS OF THE O(SCR BED L/C A�AAM TRACI SOWN NONE SRO(AST LA1t 31]TILT.LORE OR LESS.TO M WIRTH lit 6 At�f A IRKT a INTO MEMO 70 RENTON COOFEM1NE CON COURANT SO DEED KOROT) PARCEL D{1 • NOTARI'MUG N AID TOR STAR OF WAL0ICTON• • DCC(OBCR 76.1900.INNOIR■P6 COURT MCOR01N0 NO.2009a0; . ..*ryI • MOTET EASTERLY ALONG 5A0 NORTH IA[TO THE REST CPC a TIE EAST MOO LOOT PRYTf[D/YORE�u/f N. Es..R-• AVJ • I.• r OF SAD CO0LRNOIHT LOT I. A PARCEL a IRO N TIC NOTINNIST NIARI[R OF SECTION 20.70RM51�23 NORM. ' •• . • 1MNC(TORTH ALONG SAID REST LN(260 FUR.TORE 0A LESS.TO M P0911 or RANG(5 UST.W.N.,II XI NG COIRAY.WASIDIGTON,1DRI PARTICUARLY DESCRIBED • CRR010; AS FOLLOWS: DATED fL-Af�» R DIiiiiiiiill• LRCEPT POIIIDN 11tACOF LYNG QUOIN TAYI AY(IIU(SOUTH(B(160N ROM SONX)AS DESCR19(0 N D(CD ACCORDED UNOR N(COROF0 NO.2627215. KIMONO ON M REST 519E Or SAD SECTION 20 A MANNG(Or 1110 FUT SOUTH OF - 1NE NOITMA(ST CORNER THEREOF; PARCEL DI: 1/071Ct SOUTH ALONG 5AO WEST L9t 453.27 RR.LION CR MSS.TO TIC NESTERIY APPROVALS r4 • _. LIKE or COMFY ROAD NO.90: OW POTION Or(WENARM LOTS I AID 2.SECTION 70.IORNSIIV 25 NORTH.RACE IMPACT NORIMAST(RL1 ALONG SAD W1STERtr LNE 505.95 FEET; On ^^71� � 5 UST.RM.N NO MK COUNTY.RASHICION,LING R(STERIT AND RO a(01 MAIMAIMTMENCL SOUTH OP 32•41•REST.21991 FED,NORI OR LESS.70 NE POINT or (m.CD AND APPRO.ED TITS 4to O Or 9•ZClAL1lR M.19 ' SlutN1rNRAT NO I.AS EMETIC.TO TIC STATE a RASIW1C10N IN DEEDS RECORDED BLCNWIC; INO(R MCOR1206 NOS.5732439 A110 49247TX L(//{{��//21 [KEPI Am PORTION 1MMEC LYNG WW1 THE FOIIORAD O[SCIINCO►ARCEL: LESS CONEY ROM: CITY Orj)QKt 04SIRATOR /g1(DRIG/FUO;TORTS • 1 . rn ' THAT PdlDg1 a GOI(RNIKMI l01 10.SECTION 17,IOWKIOP 25 NORM.RND(5 LESS STATE IONTAY. // i LAST.RO..p RNC MOM.WA5106ION.M6 a GOKRMY(N(LOT I.SND SECTION Y C • 20 x As rclLots. I. RESERVATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS 1'i LNOMMN6 ON M REARM LTC a SRO GW(RNOEN1 LOT 1 AT A PONT 579.00 RR LL �� I - �'j�..is,OF MI NORTHEAST CORNER OF PO COKRNLEM LOT I: (RAYR(D MO OPNIVICD 11(S ""q0 M(KE NORTH 5300 RR: I2�1 OAT a(�(/�w.l',►�.1899 I ILi DIKE ITSI PARR=NMI THE SOUTH MC a SUD GENTONOR LOT TO.A WINCE . • (NUMBERS CORRESPOND MTH FIST AMERICAN SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE) - n o) a 21101 FELT.WORE a«n TO TIC EAST 000 a A TROT Of�D[mm TO COMTD)IZS s,. fJR1b�P b, 6�" . r ) _ . .. I ►UGET SOUND MACIKN. 171 AD ROROI COMPANY IT Cab RICORK ORDER Rr10 5 TO PROP[RTt R SUMO TO M[TUNAS AND OF COISN.WIS,COROIDNS. ANC DONIY ASSESSOR p„j� yy Eyy COUNT,MCORONC W 817107.INCH LK IS PA N.LEl WIN AHED AE! 7III EAST .PLama.ADRa.MS(INATONS ANO/a INCEPTIONS MOWED T POIRU,(M As RECORDED D( KTG C TS ASSESSOR _ :y O I A 7 TENT USKE SioUr NC VLSI IRt a SAO SECTONS 17 AND 20; or moot RECORDOIC No.sa•Aa AND SSYAI.RECORDS a OTC COUNI'f.WASHINGTON. '1 r" Z •,...ci OtEND DEEDED IDR RENTON T UPC 5EOOPII13 RU•i1M�COW I 10 MF OM 11EC NONTN 0p0[0 { INS NIa0RW 6 SUMCT tO D(R011 10 NNE MttSUM SLOPES TO CUTS AND FLu ACCOUNT ROOM�T:SDS-gDT2+)�].)9s-�F11 A'ZP1t.o-RB.46M;4k¢llE.�1.jA` DEL. D(c(00ER(S.OCT.WWI RR6 COATI M ORINO NO 2D09a0. OR u.9(N50N ROM AS RECORDED 1N0(N M1dWNC IC 26277T5.MC.6S a ANC C eTi ONCE EASTERLY ALOE SAD 1IOR7M(Pt TO M WEST Ut Of 1M EAST 528.00 CRT COMM 145101016E ^g j a sND CMRNN(M l07 U II.t116 PROM9T1 6 SUMO TO M RAK a rn .¢.. !THENCE 1DRIN ALONG SAD WEST U(260 MR.LORE OR LESS.TO I. PONT a MO COOOON Or(OO[1RWIOR OF ACCESS - • �•q�•N //aa,, I BIOM010: AID PAX TO C IRO. 761065 SLOPES FOR EUIs NO Rl5 AS[O10[0I(0 N SAIPIROR `I$� UO •- CY( •� 0 • COMA!CAUSE NO. CESSOT. ALSO DEEM FOR11016 IMR(O LYNG RI101 BENSON ROM•DIIN AID SOUTH(BUTT ( ! RAY; II t14 NIOI[m 6 SUMO w TO TEAK AAD morons a A sN1RARr YtIA CASI1NE111 � • . 1 '� M K IIECOIRDED UDCR RCCORp1i NO.Sfa7W.ACCORDS a MG CONT.RAWNGTON. '�^ _r _ t MI •- AND[TEAR!Ain PORTION MMa LING USRRtY a BtN50N R01D SOUNN, fE MS 1MatRM1 6 OBJECT 10 M RRK NO tOWf106 a A PA[/1C 1pA.Eir 601 0 .li 1 CO CID •�'I `") MAO(RC(P(AM PORTON 1KMa LYING MTN PC PUGE1 SOUND ENERGY.NC.. MEMO(AS(KNT AS RECORDED UNDER MCORGNG NO 720S1704117.ACCORDS Or • 1111 (POR1(RO RCS SO.D INNER k EDIT(00PAN7)S1Rf/U101 M.1 AID 2 1RAN510fS011 XNG COUNTY.WASMNGTON. UM CoeRDOR: 15 MS MOIM 6 SU6RCT TO Mt TEAR ND COIDI06 OF A RATER lK(ASE1(N As �� i-C.) AND UC(PM Ally PORION THEREOF LING SOUTHERLY Of M PUGET SONq(MRC•. RECORDED UNDER RCCORONG NO.7E05290484.RECORDS OF TING COUNTY. ' NC.(1ORNERT.v PUGET SOUND POOR k UOI CIWARANI)SN01(111ON NO.1 M0 2 WASHINGTONN •IRANSMSSON LPN CORTOOR „ t RECORDING CERTIFICATE: LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: `LIAR 17(� CHUB OWN N '•"'BW u4 Kt TT.RE Till SIC.II,NW Alt EEC.(6 �� RT1rd• No O.•,�rows*1....+T•way r•.r..,.,n 1 F 1R, ,P Q- S 1821 S 72ND AVENUE SOUTH OR PON TO PTIMP 12 NORM RAROE{LOT.VTR. SHUT A9.•w.wH P. r AwRR..R...•(_51.PT w.", en F, o.4; J- � 'Z KENT. WA 98032 10/29/95 �7�' .1r S 1......up•F• ..01 1155+u.R N '"'•IA..R.A K ' i1A1F 19N a''•r- _ -J (125)251-6222 Y''`I 1951S NORTH CREEK PARKWAY ' • I slt��a� 0 (425)251-8782 FAX CHECKED II Io0 SUITE]10 • ALAI (11'-'• 'p y." CML(NONEER9D,LAND PLANNING. 1O 6687 BDTNELl,WA 88011 OF i Num cwss7:iLc' .• • . 1..IA OS-IB-90 NPiy Oltt. SURVEYING.ETMRONOENTAL SEROICES AROE0 10: •..H. t......w.9R.i • ••.r»■y,-..1N N7� • c ENc CITY OF RENTON KIND COUNTY WA • LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT LUA- -LLA1 ►N0-030-0177 A PORTION OF THE SW1/4OF SECTION n'THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 19,AND THE OF�� 20 ALL IN TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,RANCE CITY OF RENTON,KING COU�,WASHINGTON EAST. lii 'T SCALE 1` = 200' t. • . I ( A .r.c..\\". 4,11r .".• )I i .- Or • SURVEYOR'S NOTES \\ o j / • 1.THE BEARINGS SHORN HEREON REFER TO MD 19113/91 AND ME OASCB ON COY 1 / / OF REeRaN COMMPours GO NO All. 2.ILL IRIS If099AIEH SHORN ON MS 1W HIS BEEN EZRA=1101 rat AVOECAN ` / (� d 1 TITLE NS/FRANCE COU►ANY SUSOMSION 411ARANTLE:!I .39680a-9N.DATED I�- F / 9V1�'O�"1vIT . OCTOBER 19. 1980. N PREPARING THIS 1AAP.BARGNNAEH CONSULTING ' • . v C4 1I_ _ ENGK[RS.RIG HAS CONDUCIIO NO 0DFT0100AT TOIL SIAROI NOR 6 9MO19U0EN CONSULTNO ENGwEERS.INC.ARMS OF ANY MIL 604ES MF1CYN9 THE SURVETED r PROPOTTY OMEN THAN MNOSE SHORN ON M NAP 66 DISCLOSED tY M REFEtOICEO OS/ ART AYERN'ANI SueCNYNON GUARANIEZ. BMGHALIS01 OO161ATNG EIGNEERS.NC. a j f IVf R110LLT ON MST NAOLL'AAI'S 1E)It61A1TAT1016 01 M iRIL9 0701101112 i ' A ` S IMiEPRM�([DTM sURVEY N1D T NC COMPLETENESS coHMTNC EMG4ERS. / 4B �} au+anS M uAr's AcnR1ACY MO colflEmNEss TO MAT um ' • Y ' ` T f ! i . 3.Au WOW ARE N FRT(US.ARMY FIET). • ..M S 6 A FED TRAMS(ARMY. A SOMA S•EIECT1ONC TOLL SIATEN INS US[0 ro N I —%r / / A MEASURE THE ANGULAR AND INSTANCE RELATIONSHIPS DEMON N ME CONTROES1Nc -. • NOMIE TATCII AS 9101RC CLOSURE RATIOS OF M MOMS IC OR Dane THOU • SPECIFIED 0- DISTANCE BEE/4 CU0MIW AT IN HAS.ONS0RNEMiNN 01E YUR OF THE OM Cr 1143 SWAM j I +I . I. A,,Leg • J • • I . 1• Z ./. .Gu asA �-, • w�■ tYr w tae.n wt ua uo•a wr w ua t9 $HT y�' oE�s ,GHA(I 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH drt PCIv • T0ITNWM SS 11011T11 RMaE t tAST,x.w . / + ,C sf Q' to KENT. WA 98032 10/29/99 In rj I -A m i Z ( ) w.* PUGET WESTERN INC. 2 IF. `T'; -4l 425 251-8782 I' . 200 19616 NORTH CREEK PARKWAY - (425)251-8782 FAX oROE'n awG SUITE 310 �F ��` , .23E10 ,I', S y .`` i d 66eT 8OTHELL,WA Y6011 •p/O T 1LA ' si �• CIVIL ENGINEERING.LAND PUNNaNC, d I.•-E�1os 1IB-99 • e:�rA'T9 tNalMtt' SURVEYOIG.ENNRONUENTAL SERVICES ma,n, CITY OF RENTON KING COUNTY WA -* • • rs LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT LUA-98-164-LLA N i . - END-070-0177 • A PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 17,THE • NE 1/4 OF SECTION 19,AND THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 20 ALL IN TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,RANGE. 5 EAST,WM • 1. .CITY OF RENTON,KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON S• •-..!, . / • '- ,\ ' • SCALE 1- = 100' • !�0 \ ,. . ab ‘• 0 7 90 6nre'r ait / 9$taID-goi4 . F • •ra \. / MM. • C r401D t f 1 la/ i • i \ • SEA •,4. ...,77i'7r/ • � - ./' • / *IA III I !J tfi''} ETA1 $.0 / •... 1 © ]' i I •y •IIMIErgrieril7� I. it FE.! it ` �az j n•:rt,l© • I � i YO . itt • =fib •7 S. / mi. 1.. .`r ? ® .r,. SODO , • 2L * i• NMI ST9F I m ! j i C • .t""r F'G7•l� 1 • . / s ®r'2'4!i7EID I N / • . 'e 911.• OAK Mt CUM 1D10114 NOUS OEM T17GOrt I Ct 43.71 177100 0176.10• 2100 I `,, r' Cl u75 leo6l6 O'[M'V6• 43.31 „ . t 7 �. / . 121.74 1111.63 OOOS'31• 6ao Q j04, - GS 225.57 507.V1 '2526.01• 114.M • 71 wilNmrtt n . 1/2 107V71 77o w'6C[2623r co 111.53 111.16 MY10m• 10•20 6 MUG 1y 1 tit 10 6E sEl Cl 66l3 M7.N 11'2GIM• NM• I U[S I Q r / ® - 7p010,-7(6.6MSS IVi001$R00 Cl 11074 N7.V6 1 W31 55.27 I ' Cl KIS 47443 007671• KD I I 1 • C10 12041 1606l6 OTN'40• 10A0 .7/VIIWP , ~ CII 130.70 175616 0C13111• 1131 116tr C12 WO 43A0 0Q36•U• •lp I YV i . . . ' 'r I .figy. / ia I. . if' ., • a • FC ;'8S 1 I• +°'• I i 4i P. 37/4„..41. . %5Q • 1�� wiz WU SW V4 SSG 11 NE Vl SEC.».NW V•SIC.10 SHT \ ; Irt, `1 1Au 0E7� 42.. ,� 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH art ' 70'7N/117 13 NCI1TN.MICA LAM■U. • F4S s�i P AV/ 0 KENT.WA 98032 10(29(96 �•t17n • EI' . Z (425)251-6222 .�_r. _ _ MET WESTEE01 INC.' 4 F (12S}251-8782 FAx t ao�t1 100 MATE 31o0NTH CREEK PARKWAY i 7`2'��' :I° i i $ ,a,b. RwG BOTHELL.WA 95011 OF 0.p C,tli Si t. Y CM.ENGNEENUIC.MO NANNINC. 6667 _ • •, 1�•6 ��.,A,.E■a•10.4. Sohn..ODIRONNENTAL SERVICES N'°a�w: CITY OF RENTON KING COUNTY WA 4 1 • LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT • LUA-98-,a4-LLA LND-0J0-0177 A PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 17,THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 19,AND THE NW 1/4'OF SECTION 20 9RlDZ,tO1OI4 ALL IN TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH RANGE 5 EAST,W.M. if - ( CITY OF RENTON,KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON SCALE 1" = 100' j �: •1 a-MI • • • • i L.10 ;' X1W 'ST173 1 ,00'Sr f 1A .481'22•w1 fit"*iFF�•'1 Sa DD `` f l 1` 1E10• CO_Navi5ul L. �7�rr I M 7M i rnrlr. . 7an A.ttfTJ•AT ''•��0 ElWri.Ti1® f ua ; b �t ......p 7■ 0 ,f,, an ar Mod r ®�i1!•d,•ti.1��D r7 COMMIX ran 11 r 1� !iE f1�.,,� v,•,l �;•' I 1 =(.SLED 10/vl ERIN F^a'!� I QE7AL Ard •, r Yd '�� •� 1- '- k X / AU -4: , :.•17+ ,1 t^ o ' WPC TAOIL ' ., -•••r- h CUTE ILHGM RADEE DELTA TANGENT r f170' +I 1061017r f rpao Mel M MC P,LP.I: r Q31'7r f 12017' - W CI N.71 177.10 01' 10• 21. , MOW 7/177 ...' _•••••_...L. U Cl 5E75 11109.M 0t0'11r 43•30 'I 72 1 If*swig-f 1 .1'!__ - _ 'lae i = C.I12t.07 I111.4 o0'Da'tl' was • 1m IKN1911 MOO S WOW-. 12 1'L , ,••_+• NI2f• ...-- R W COCS 22157 507.11 2f21.01• 11110 131N1101 ran 00 n/1• 1�oS� •*13'e•1r f n.'r I > CO 10D3 1/9.ID TINED• 90 20 f mow.f < Q 11 A. 447.44 IT•20'aD• 11.11 = r(IM OOIa M G6[ - m 110]/ M7.M 'sow L'.N M100 01171 '.� • VDf APMDdM!0 1 - LOT ist • Z • "�Ot J co 0444 11 n/17 0Syar 4427 • t 11�a'r`LOT ��1 CIO 12a11 Yw•to uro w w 1e OP�_n,, ` �• 4 CII 13070 1A/110 of IS'I2• w.3a y f t., �`` ex. 1 ' C72 aka um �Sr11• {111 Cr• i'°° `� 3 / CatinG UT 7. . ' / _ p ., 70 TIE%7 2 -ICE 212311* /r, ^ e_Q: �••' Q e 0 . MOO 1-7N LMA3S.11DORF PUG \ r R SEE TOTE I \ /.g^r�.f 3 1 at 1 NOR \ •9` `yl 4 ' r' 1Y4 PROMO 1QD1 SUMIID AM MO 1 f.01601100 6 SUE=70 04 COE 10 WEE i i' REL2EM0 S10P(5 109 W6 MD ILLS 90 COMM TO 0MG COugr In OLD;CORDED 1aOfl RCORDI4 C(Y9 • �'�•••0. "r / NO.212771S 1441E lAS M Snare TOUR 01 U:01 1 ME;TNSE SLOPE RODS 1E0 TO MRCt i DC NOWRn 11T111 DE;CORDED 161R1OIT MD 1101EFO;f067IM6 1Y1 Ufl01140•IMME1 \\ CASO4M1. DE COT E\!O4 Fame 701 THE LOC1101 O 1 f.1 NSW ICU 14 DE 1r4 Coma •. trj ` 9r 0.0111 DOD 001ES f1CY 1D71 nEN DE RMO YS U0 OR fW SIRR7 NO 104-0 114Y p lT 7 MIES STATED OW MUSS PU. MN OCT RI DE 009KR IWO 91IK1(7D[9w0tr 4T01 11E 104 \\ \ ,/; C016TRIt1CN1. MO Of DESE RLCS 1011 F0110 OUR14 OUR FIELD SLIMY.04 AT STA110N 70.4.12 3 NO SLCK M I 35.0t0 MO P09106 UDE MM1 0 DM TKDM 3 PIET Of 7M. �iL = CMO CM ATJIIS P09706 THE if M MN Tr rc 'o . DES M011110IIS KW USED TO ES0At1EN 1N _� , _�_ dot!__ ROU 1104-0f-Iq Of 30 FEET o EACH SEE CS DE COORIJ[- M 50104E1 1157,1N A01T-Of-1Ar `� \ - - IMApr0 S Of hPO5T)0t1O�HCogIT NUM 9.4444ME MOT of MD�DC 1 T-00 1n fro PC Wm 7R Kral • p� \ - - •- OM C 7 a 1)4 1(057 ra Rai(f�ELTra SR -O6 6 OF :RAFT Of M e[ESIED0*0 EOQ K EKES 700hol TIE 09([TCE • 91KAq O DE 00601 11010. rt WT R ME Du114 TIE W11fIMC1p K A-1a5,rt 1A5 9p 71r1L/r Jr 1 . , ORIME0 MT DE TOE OF ME EEL RS 100 1LOSE 10 DE D1AH1 0 WT Of RN30.kW NO TIME INC • •)/ .•1 fKH, y Q�J• 1010 eat Ou0E0 TO 11S POSOR 7555ON FOR ME WET'COKIVAL APIMLNRY.M 470100E Q \ ' IOGICN K i'r^ /,C'' • '. `i �' KM R7MiD1[Nt.KONRD RN;CET SOLO fOKR 0 001T CofMT(Cl ME CDIE7ILCKD 10U , 1 ! Q r 7 / 1 R / '041141m _ ♦ ,..`..I. , , L tt c H ' KLI Otl. _ �^ . \� fv„;1,p �G AV�1� 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH ow.. PC* ar v1 T;a.n M v1 AM n,IA v1 ua.2D Y ,,/, �2- M6 T0141"4 22 11D11M 1ANOE E EA2T,1.Y. SHT �,%40 4 ms- 111Afzi tx KENT, WA 98032 10/29/98 0R.n r01 �!A „ilk_ (425)251-6222 v"r. t_ .. 100 PUGET WESTERN.INC. 3 ,t�` - - ' (425)251-8782 FAX 0400 M. SUITS NORTH CREEK PARKWAY pq. /f82JD�, ,�7. o yI�(� 1 SUITE�f0 °rit'IELMo S .4 'I" .' CML ENC!EERMC,1N0 alrwwNG, '81�0' 6007 BOTNELL,WA 95011 OF,E 1._1+05-10-99 Er5907 07401t. SURVEYING.CIMRONYENTAL SEIMCC! ^°•1°'° CITY OF RENTON KING COUNTY WA 4 L J.....* MMONIF Mr OF RENTON R.ECEIVED WATER LINE EASEMENT THIS INDENTURE made this kr� 2 — day of j46,c. 1974, between PUGET SOUND POWER 6 LIGHT COMPANY, a Washington corporation ("Grantor" herein) and the CITY OF RENTON, a Municipal corporation of King County, ' Washington, ("Grantee" herein); WITNE::SLTH: That in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and v valuable consideration, in hand paid, receipt of which is hereby acknow- vledged, and performance by Grantee of the covenants hereinafter set forth, C7 Grantor hereby grants unto Grantee a perpetual easement over, across and under +' l following described property, situated in King County, CJ Washington: CD That portion of the East 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Imo` Northeast 1/4 of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , including Block 2, Walsworth's 1st Addition to Renton, recorded in Volume 6 of Plats, page 23, records of said county, lying southerly of Grady Way. R. Permanent 5-foot Easement That portion of the above described property lying within 55 feet as measured at right angles southwesterly and westerly of and parallel with the following described centerline, as shown on Washington State Highway Department .Right of Way Plan of SR 515 (Burnett Street Extension) MP 5.15 to MP 7.22 Renton vicinity: Carr Road to Grady Way, Sheet 6 of 11 sheets. approved November 5, 1971: Beginning at the intersection (H.E.S. 433+99.83) of the centerlines of Grady Way and SR 515 (Burnett Street) ; thence S 32°51'49" E along said centerline 231.66 feet (H.E.S. 431+68 17) to the P.C. of a curve to the•right having a radi . of 700 n'' feet; thence along said curve through a central angle of 35°32' 40" for a distance of 434.26 feet to the P.E. of said curve (H.E.S. 427+33.91) ; thence continuing along said centerline S 02'40'51" W 99.51 feet to the terminus of said centerline (H.E.S. 426+34.4) ; EXCEPT public reads. • B. Temporary 25-foot Construction Easement That portion of the above described property lying within 75 feet, as measured at right angles southwesterly and westerly of and paralle_ with the following described centerline: Beginning at the intersection (H.E.S. 433+99.83) of the centerlines of Grady Way and SR 515 (Burnett Street), Right of Way Plan, SR 515 (Burnett Street Extension) MP 5.15 to MP 7.22 Renton vicin- ity: Carr Road to Grady day, Sheet 6 of '1 sheets, approved November 5, 1971; thence S 32°51'49" E along said centerline 231.66 feet (H.E.S. 431+68.17) to the PT. of a curve to the right having a radius of 700.00 feet; thence along said curve through a central angle of 35°32'40" for a distance of 434.26 feet to the P.T. of said curve (H.E.S. 427+33.91) ; thence continuing along said centerline S 02°40'51" W. 99.51 feet to the terminus of said centerline (H.E.S. 426+34.4) ; EXCEPT public roads. The temporary construction easement shall remain in force dur- ing construction and until such time as the water line has been accepted for maintenance and operation by the City of Renton., for the purpose of using the above described area during con- struction and installation of a water line with all connections, manholes and appurtenances thereto on the property hereinabovc described in the permanent easement, but in no event later t''an February 1, 1975. Said easement being for the purpose ofek- ing, constructing, operating, maintaining, removing, repairing, replacing and using a water line with all connections, manholes and appurtenances thereto, is granted on the following terms and conditions: EXCEPTION No.__ f _V Nis L -ems_ 7,111111=1 _ _ milipmemmemmr 1. The facilities shall consist of a single line of pipe not over 24 inches inside diameter and all connections, manholes and appurten- ances thereto, said line of pipe to be buried at least three feet below the natural surface of the ground at all points. Grantee agrees to install•,and maintain substantial permanent markers at both ends of said • facility on the right of way hereby granted sufficient to give notice to all persons of the location of Grantee's buried facilities. 2. Grantee agrees to save and hold Grantor harmless from all loss or damage which may be due to the exercise by Grantee of the rights herein granted, and from all claims for such damage by whomsoever made and to indemnify Grantor for all such loss, damage and claims. 3. Grantor shall not be liable for any loss or damages to Grantee's vfacilities resu°;.ing from Grantor's use of the lands encumbered by this j easement unless such loss or damage is due to negligent act or omission of Grantor. Grantor agrees to use reasonable care. CD 4. Grantee shall reimburse the Grantor for any increases in taxes 't or assessments of any kind levied against the above described land by r" reason of the installation of the water line, the use thereof, or the easement herein granted. 5. Grantor reserves the right to develop and use the lands encum- bered by this easement for any purpose not inconsistent with the rights granted herein. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Grantor reserves the right at any time, and from time to time, to con- struct or reconstruct electric lines (whether AC or DC; whether now existing or hereafter to be constructed) on this easement in such manner that wires and other related structures may be under, over, along and across the lands encumbered.by this easement. 6. Grantor reserves the right to grant access rights to others along or across the lands encumbered by this easement and to grant ar"" other right which is not inconsistent with the rights he: :in grants_ Grantee. 7. Grantee agrees to provide adequate drainage to prevent any backup of surface water over the easement area or Grantor's adjacent land which may result from Grantee's exercise of said easement. 8. Should the easement area be subsequently improved, Grantee agrees that it shall, at its sole cost and expense, replace or restore to its improved condition any such improvements which are damaged or destroyed as the result of Grantee's exercise of its rights of mainten- ance, repair or replacement. 9. Following the installation of said facilities, Grantee agrees to restore the easement area to the condition it was in prior to the exercise of the rights herein granted. 10. Grantee agrees that should there be •a'ny material excavated from Grantor's property which is in excess of the amount required to restore the surface to its original grade, such excess material shall be removed at Grantee's expense. 11. No assignment of the privileges and benefits accruing to the Grantee hereunder, by operation of law or otherwise, shall be valid without the prior written consent of Grantor. 12. The rights and obligations of the parties shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon their respective successors and assigns. - 2 - war.--- 13. The rights hereby grai,ted shall cease and determine whenever Grantee shall have permanently abandoned the use of its facilities accommodated by this easement for a period of five years. PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY • BY ' a 4-s ✓ anal Estate Division v O N Ul STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS. t` COUNTY OF KING On this ..,♦( day of ¢ ,,,</ , 1974, before me, the undersigned, personally appeared LESLIE A. DONNER, to me known to be the Manager-Real Estate Division, of PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instru- ment, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument. • WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day an year first above written. V�51.., • Notary Public in and for e State, ,f,;;•,r` < • Washington, residing at yt ,,�G'`•J� ' . h•tc - 3 - ` • raiELOPMEN7'PLANNING CITY OF RENTON N0f05 999 • !RECEIVED • • • AFTER RECORDING MAIL TO: Name Puget Sound Energy Address One Bdlevue Center 411-108°i Ave.N.E. -- City/State Bellevue,WA 98004 • Fiat American Title Document Title(s):(or transactions contained therein) 4=6. 1. Muter Easement Insurance Company grai 3. 3%gaa-5 N 4. Cr) 381)11q-5 Reference Number(s)of Dornmeats assigned or released: iGUspace for wit any use only, !'� Additional numbers on page_of document got Grutor(1):(Last tame first,then(list name and initials) 11)1 2.Paget Waters,Inc. 3. 4. S. Additional name on page_of document Grantoe(s):(list name first,then first name and initials) 1.Puget Sound Enemy.lac L • 3. 4. "• S. Additional names on page_of document Abbreviated Legal Description u foliose:(i.e.lot/block/plat or sectionAu hipireagriquaza/goaAer) P- Section 17Twp23N Rag 5ESW''ASW'/. Section 19 Twp 23N Rag 5E E''A NE'' e' Section 20 Twp 23N Rag SE GL 1 in NW'/. Blocks I-2,Walswvnh's 1`Add.Vol 6,pg.23 • a: Complete legal description is on page 9 of document Assessor'.Property Tax PuaUAcconnt Number(s): 972500-0751-06,172305-9072-03,192305-9091-08.202305.9006-09,202305-9007.08, 202305-900E-07,202305.9037-02,202305-9050-04,202305-9146-00,202305-9028-03, 915460-001G-00&192305-9090-09 RECORDPA EXCEPTION tti•o. -- F 41 • AJ ER RECORDING RETURN TO Paget Sound Entity One Bellevue Center 411-1081hAve.ME. Bellevue,WA 98004 • • • PUGET SOUND ENERGY MASTER EASEMENT • For and in consideration of One Dollar(S 1.00)and other valuable consideration,the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,Puget Western,Inc.,a Washington corporation.("Grantor"herein),hereby conveys and warrants to PUGET SOUND ENERGY,INC..a Washington corporation("Grantee"herein),for the purposes hereinafter set forth,a perpetual nonexclusive easement over,undo along,across and through the following described real property(the"Property"herein)in King County,Washington. See Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Except as may be otherwise set forth herein Crania's rights shall be exercised upon those portions of the Property(the"Easement Areas"herein)described as follows: [Note,all easement areas are based upon nni existing facilities,as-built,shown on that certain 9arghausen Survey dated June 19,1998,last revised July LA 30,1998,Job No.6687 and further shown on the easement exhibit attached as Exhibit B). A. Transmission Line Easement Area rstaflower linen c • - N EASEMENT A • All that portion of the Northeast and of the Northwestquarter of Section 19,Township 23 North.Range S East,W.M., and o theCounty, of Section 20,Township 23 North.Range 5 East,W.M.,City of King t, gton,described as follows: A strip of land,100 feet in width,lying 50 feet on each side of the following described easement centerline: COMMENCING at the Northeast corner afraid Section 19,from which point the North quarter comer of said Section 19 bears North 89'42'16"West,2661.81 feet distant; THENCE South 20'03'21"West,626.75 feet to a point on the Easterly Talbot Road South,a.k.a.SR 515,and the POINT OF BEGiNND4GG;; nght right-of-way margin of THENCE South 89'29'49"East,61.02 feet, THENCE South 7r 26'19'East,746.06 fat to a point on the Westerly right-away margin of SR-405 and the terminus of the described line. EXCEPT any portion thereof lying within the right-of-way of Benson Road South. Extending ding or shortening the sidelines of said easement to intersect at angle points and to terminate eit described right-of-way margins. B Trausmtssbn (thhree 3 separate easement area fifty(50)feet in width havingtwenty-fives25it a tod pole line),gels suchside separate centerlines (25)feet of such width on each side of three described as follows: EASEMENTBI All that poNorthwest oonhot Northeast quarter of Section 19,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M., andll offtheNrt King Cows quarter of Section 20,Township 23 North,Range 5W.M..City,of County,Washingtton,described as follows: East, A strip of land,50 feet in width,lying 25 feet on each side of the following described casement centerline: COMMENCING at the Northeast comer of said Section 19,from which point the North quarter comer of said Section 19 bars North 39'42'16"West,2661.81 feet distant; THENCE South 24'08'45'West,590.33 feet to a point on the Easterly right-of--way margin of Talbot Road South,ak.a.SR-S I5,end the POINT OF BEOINNING; THENCE South 81'ST 34"East,24.55 feet to a point he einafterrefemd to as Point"A"; Easement.PSE(III 79e).doe -I I. • • • • THENCE South 81'5T 34"East,728.01 feet; • • . ' . THENCE North 22'0T 14"East,442.59 feet to a point on the Westerly right-of-way margin of Benson Road South end the terminus of the described line. TOGETHER WITH a strip of land,10 feet in width,lying 5 feet on each aide of the following described easement centerline; BEGINNING at the aforementioned Point"A"; THENCE North I I•It 35"East,65.00 feet to the terminus of the described line. EXCEPT any portion thereof lying within the right-of--way of Benson Road South. Extending or shortening the sidelines oink easement to intersect at angle points and to terminate • at die described right-of--way margIns. EASEMENT B2 All that portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 19,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M., and of the Northwest quintet of Section 20,Township 23 North,Range S East,W.M,City of Renton,King County,Washington,described as follows: A strip of land,50 feet in width,lying 25 feet net each side of the following described easement centerline: COMMENCING at the Northeast corner of said Section 19,from which point the North quarter corner of said Section 19 bears North 69"42'16"West,2661.0 1 feet distant; THENCE South 13•311'13"West,724.00 feet to a point on the Easterly right-of-way margin of Talbot Road South,ak.a SR-S IS,and the POINT OF BEGINNING; a"1 THENCE South 7r 5g'12"East,711.03 fog to a point on the Westerly right-of--way margin of • • • 111 SR-405 and the terminus of the described line. • 0 voi er4 EXCEPT and portion thereof lying within the rlgll.rf--way of Rensoet Road South. Extending or shortening the sidelines of said txsemcnt to intersect at angle points and to tennbmte ao at the described right-of-way margins. EASEMENT B3 All that portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 19,Township 23 North,Range S East,W.M., end of the Northwest quaver of Section 20,Township 23 North,Range S East,WM.,^,-ily of Renton,King County,Washington,described as follows: A strip allied,50 feet in width,lying 25 feet on each side of the following described easement centerline: COMMENCING at the Northeast corner of said Section 19,from which point the North quarter Comer of said Section'1 9 beats North 11942'16"West,2661.11 feet distant; THENCE South 39"31'55'East,tt79.45 feet toe point on the Westerly right-of-way margin of SR-05 and the POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE South 27"22'I I"West,139.12 feet; THENCE South 77'SS 09"East,48.63 feet to rho Westerly right-of-way margin of SR-405 and die terminus of the described Irian Extending or shortening the sidelines of said easement to mtasect at angle points mid to terminate at the described right-of-way margin. t~ Trarumibn Ida Oaaeaaeat Area for each*flitted(3)separate"H-Frame"wood polo limes, each such easement area being sixty(60)fat in width having thirty(30)feet of such width on each side of three sepana waterlines described as follows: Eantocd-PSE(I t 179Qaoe .2 ' si • • EASEMENT C• • •I . All that portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 19,Township 23 North,Range S East,W.M., and of the Northwest quarter of Section 20,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,City of Renton,King County,Washington,described as follows: A strip of land,60 feet in width,lying 30 feet on each side of the following described easement centerline: COMMENCING at the Northeast coma of said Section 19,from which point the North quarter . comer of said Section 19 bears North 89"42'16"West,2661.51 feet distant; THENCE South 22'00'58"East,1116.15 feet to a point on the Westerly right-of-way margin of SR-405 and the POINT OF BEGINNING; • . THENCE North 87.13'01"West,309.11 feet; THENCE North 38'16'46"East,60.00 feet; . THENCE South 38'16'46"West,60.00 feet; THENCE South 87.54'37"West,63.00 feet; THENCE North 87'54'37"East,63.00 feet; THENCE South 41'09'03"West,333.60 feet; THENCE South 53'31'58"West,59.45 feet to a point on the Easterly right-of-way margin of Talbot Road South,a.k.a.SR-S 15,and the terminus of the described line. EXCEPT any portion thereof lying within the right-of-way of Benson Road South. Extending or shortening the sidelines of said easement to intersect at angle points and to terminate at the described right-of-way margins. 0•4 EASEMENT C2 - . • All that portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 19,Township 23 North,Range S East,W.M., 1.4 N and of the Northwest quarter of Section 20,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M..City of Renton,King County,Washington.described as follows: • A strip of land,60 feet in width.tying 30 feet on each side of Me 'u-,g described ca cmcat m centerline: COMMENCING at the Northeast comer of said Section 19,from which point the North quarter comer of said Section 19 bean North 89'4T 16'West,2661.31 feet distant; THENCE South 19°31'49"East,1150.29 feet to a point on the Westerly right-of-way margin of SR-405 and the POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE North 87'25'28"West,254.58 feet; THENCE North 42'54'41"East 63.00 feet; THENCE South 42'54'41"West,63.00 feet; THENCE North 3V 45'13"West,75.00 feet: THENCE South 88'45'13"East,78.00 feet; THENCE South 39'19'23"West,335.04 feet; THENCE North 78'44'10"West.75.00 feet; THENCE South 78•M'10"East,75.00 feet; THENCE South 35"43'16"West,62.50 feet; THENCE South 09'54'39"East,163.78 feet to a point on theNorthwesterly right-of-wry margin of SR-405 and the terminus of the described line. EXCEPT any portion thereof lying within the right-of-way of Benson Road South. Extending or shortening the sidelines of said easement to intersect at angle points and to terminate at the described right-of-way margins. EASEMENT C3 All that portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 19,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M., and of the Northwest quarter of Section 20,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,City of Renton,King County,Washington,described as follows: A strip of land,60 feet in width,lying 30 feet no each aide of the following described easement centerline: COMMENCING at the Northeast comer of said Section 19,front which point the North quarter comer of said Section 19 bears North 89'4T 16"West.2661.51 feet distant; THENCE South 06'35'30"West,1412.87 feet to a post on the Easterly tight-of-way margin of Talbot Road South,a.k.a.SR-515,and the POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE North 64°20'48"East,473.39 feet; THENCE South 87.25'28"East,30.42 feet to a point on the Westerly right-of-way margin of SR- 405 and the terminus ofthe described line. Easement-PSE(t 11798).doe -3- S • • EXCEPT any portion thereof lying within the right-of--way of Benson Road South. EXCEPT any portion thereof lying within the right-of--way of SR-405. Extending or shortening the sidelines of said easement to intersect at angle points and to terminate at the described right-of-way margins., D. Distribution Line Easement Ares for four(4)separate single wood pole lines,two(2)along Talbot Road. Two(2)running east and west,each such easement area being ten(10)feel in width having five(5)feet of such width on each side of four(4)separate centerlines described as • follows: EASEMENT DI All that portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 19,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M., and of the Northwest quaver of Section 20,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,City of • Renton,King County,Washington,described as follows: A strip of land,10 feet in width,lying 5 feet on each side of the following described easement centerline: COMMENCING at the Northeast corner of said Section 19,from which point the North quarter corner of said Section 19 bears North Sr 42'16"West,2661.81 feet distant; THENCE South 44'19'22'West,408.98 feet to a point on the Southerly right-of-way margin of South Grady Way and the POINT OF BEGINNING; • THENCE South 10'IT 53'East,53.88 feet; N THENCE South I T 16'55"East,201.48 feet; Cr) THENCE South IT 08'IS"East,212.61 feet; wf THENCE South O I.25'01"East,37.69 feet to a point on the Easterlyrrightofway margin of (•• Talbot Road South,aka SR-515,and the terminus of the described line. Extending or shortening the sidelines of said easement to intersect at angle points and to terminate 1•4 at the described right-of-way margins. EASEMENT D2 All that portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 19,Township 23 North,Range S East,W.M., and of the Northwest quarter of Section 20,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M,City of Renton,King County,Washington,described as follows: A strip of land,10 feet in width,lying 5 feet on each side of the following described easement centerline: COMMENCING at the Northeast corner of said Section 19,from which point the North quarter comer of said Section 19 bears North 89'42'16"West,2661.81 feet distant THENCE South 43'38'53'West,314.49 feet to a point on the Southerly right-of-way margin of South Grady Way and the POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE South 15'59'24'East,108.09 fat; THENCE South 13.44'58"East,233.71 feet THENCE South 23'31'44"East,146.98 feet THENCE South 04•Z3'10"West,241.94 feet; THENCE South or 11'23"Way 36.60 feet to a point on the Easterly right-of-way margin of Talbot Road South,a.k.a.SR•515,and the terminus of the described line. Extending or shortening the sidelines of said easement to intersect at angle points and to terminate at the described right-of--way margins. EASEMENT D3 All that portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 19,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M., and of the Northwest quarter of Section 20,Township 23 North,Range S East,W.M,City of Renton,King County.Washington,described as follows: A strip of land,10 feet in width,tying S fat on each side of the following described easement centerline: COMMENCING at the Northeast corner of said Section 19,from which point the North quarter comer of said Section 19 bean North 89'42'16"West,2661.11 feet distant THENCE South OS'14'46'West,995.62 feet to a point on the Easterly right-of-way margin of Talbot Road South,a.k.a.SR-SIS,and the POINT OF BEGINNING; Esxmenl•PSE(I1I79$)4 c -4- t • • . . • • • • .. THENCE North 85'44'29'East;480.65 fed; ' • THENCE North 47'10'13"East,219.08 feet to the terminus of the described line. EXCEPT any portion thereof Tying within the right-of-way of Benson Roed South. Extending or shortening the sidelines of said easement to intersect at angle points and to terminate •at the described right-of-way margins. • EASEMENT D4 • All that portion oldie Northeast quarter of Section 19,Township 23 Worth,Range 5 East,W.M., • and of the Northwest quarter of Section 20,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,City of Renton,King County,Washington,described as follows•. • . A strip of land,10 feet in width,lying 5 feel on each side of the following described easement • centerline: • COMMENCING at the Northeast corner of said Section 19,from which point the North quarter corner of said Section 19 beers North 89°42'16"West,2661.81 feet distant; THENCE South 39'38'55"East,879.45 feet to a point on the Westerly right-of-way margin of SR-405; THENCE South 27'20'32"West,11.32 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE North 50'2T 45"West,67.83 feet to the terminus of the described line. Extending or shortening the sidelines of said easement to intersect at angle points and to terminate at the described right-of-way margin. F Fiber Optic Line Easement Area: EASEMENT E y All that portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 19.Township 23 North,Range S East,W.M., and of the Northwest quarter of Section 20,Township 23 North,Range S East,W.M.,City of Ratios,King County,Washington,described as follows: gal A strip of land,10 fed in width,lying S feet on each side of the following described easement centerline: COMMENCING at the Northeast corner of mid Section 19,from which point the North quarter corner of said Section 19 ben North 89'42'16"West,2661.81 fat distant; THENCE South 34'3T 13"West,199.0E feet to a paint on the Southerly right-of-way margin of South Grady Way and the POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE South 41'33'32'West,156.90 feet; THENCE South 10'20'52"West,102.55 feet to the terminus of the described line. Extending or shortening the sidelines of said easement to intersect at angle points and to terminate at the described right-of-way margin. F. 'toed Frontue Easement EASEMENT F AU that portion of the Southwest quarter of Section 17,Township 23 Notts,Range 5 East,W.M., - the Northeast quarter of Section 19.Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,and of the Northwest quarter of Section 20,Township 23 North,Range S East,W.M.,City of Renton,King County,Washington,described as follows-. • A strip of land 15 feet in width,the Northerly boundary of which is coincident with the Southerly margin of South Grady Way;a strip dined 15 fed in width,the Westerly boundary of which is coincident with the Easterly margin of Talbot Road;a strip of land 15 feet in width,the Easterly boundary of which is coincident with the Westerly rly margin of Benson Red;and a strip of land 15 feet in width,the Westerly boundary of which is eoiocidetswith the Easterly margin of Beason Road. ' Extending or shortening the sidelines of said easement to terminate at the boundaries of the grantors property. S Emcmm-PSE(I 1179a1.doe -5. 3 I. Purpose.Grantee shall have the right to operate,maintain,repair,replace,improve,remove, enlarge and use one or more electric transmission and/or distribution systems over and/or under the Easement Areas,together with all necessary or convenient appurtenances thereto,which said systems may include but are not limited to the following: a. Overhead facilities. Poles and/or towers with crossarms,braces,guys and anchors; electric transmission and distribution lines;fiber optic cable,communication and signal lines and t transformers. b. Underground facilities Underground conduits,cables,vaults,manholes,switches and transformers:semi-buried or ground mounted facilities such as pads,transformers and switches;fiber optic cable,communication and signal lines. . Following the initial construction of all or a portion of its systems,Grantee may,from time to time,construct such additional facilities as it may require for its systems subject to the limitations set forth below and in no event constructed in such a way place or manna so as to impair Grantor's use of the Property consistent with the language set forth in paragraph number 5 below. 2. Access. Following forty-eight(48)hours prior notice,save and except emergency circumstances (at which time Grantee may immediately access the Easement Areas),Grantee shall have the right of access to the Easement Areas over and across the Property to enable Grantee to reasonably exercise its rights hereunder. Grantee shall repair or compensate Grantor for all damage to the Property,including any damage to Grantor's inventory,improvements,parking areas,landscaping,equipment,other items of personal property,roads,crops,driveways and fences caused by the exercise of such right of access. 3. Easement Area Clearing and Maintenance.Following forty-eight(48)hours prior written notice,g 4 Grantor's consent,which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld,conditioned or delayed, Grantee shall have the right to cut,remove and dispose of any and all brush,trees and other vegetation presently existing upon the Easement Area and which impairs the use of Grantee's system constructed within the Easement Areas,Grantee shall also have the right to control,on a continuing basis-and by any prudent and reasonable means,the establishment and growth of Isiah,trees and other vegetation upon the Easement Area which could,in the reasonable opinion of Grantee,reasonably interfere with the exercise of 1I • Grantee's rights herein or create a hazard to Grantee's systems. Grantor's landscaping shall not be damaged, (or if damaged,shall be restored by Grantee,to Grantor's satisfaction),unless and except to the extent that eel such landscaping could,in Grantee's reasonable judgment,substantially interfere with or create a hazed to r- Grantees Sy SUMS. 4. Trees Outside Easement Area.So long as not in violation of any applicable law,and following Grantor's prior written approval which approval will not be unreasonably conditioned,withheld or delayed. Grantee shall have the right to cut,trim,remove and dispose of any trees located on the Property outside the Easement Areas which could,in Grantee's reasonable judgment,substantially interfere with or create a hazard to Grantee's systems.Grantor shall be entitled to compensation for trees cut,trimmed,removed or disposed of,including the actual market value of merchantable timber(if any)cut and removed from the Property by Grantee.Grantor's landscaping shall not be damaged,(or if damaged,shall be restored by Grantee to Grantor's satisfaction)unless and except to the extent that such landscaping could,in Grantee's reasonable judgment,substantially interfere with or sate a hazard to Grantee's systems S. Grantor's Use of Easement Area. Grantor reserves the right to use the Easement Areas for any purpose not inconsistent with the rights herein granted,provided,that Grantor shall not construct or maintain any buildings,on the Easement Areas and Grantor shall do no blasting within 300 feet of Grantee's systems without Grantee's prior written consent Subject to the foregoing.Grantee has Gr ator's consent to use the Easement Areas for uses relating to commercial parking lots or auto sales lots,including landscaping(not more than fifteen(15)feet high)asphalt and concrete and other similar types of materials (provided Grantee may cut and patch the same at Grantee's cost)and constructing non-metalic kiosk-type sitting areas substantially similar to die non-metalic kiosk-type sitting area illustrated at Exhibit C attached hereto(not more tun 12 feet high)and incorporated herein by reference 6. Indemnity.Grantee agrees to indemnify Grantor from and against all liability incurred by Grantor as a result of die negligence or willful acts of Grantee or its,and employees,but nothing herein shall require Grantee to indemnify Grantor for that portion of any such liability judicially determined by■ court of competent jurisdiction to be attributable to the negligence or willful acts of Grantor 7. Abandonment. The rights herein granted to Grantee shall continue until such time as Grantee ceases to use any or all the Easement Areas for a period of ten(10)successive years,in which event said Easement Areas shall immediately self-terminate and all rights hereunder shall revert to Grantor,providing the remaining portions of the easement areas which are or have been used within said tea yea are not terminated. 8. Successors and Assigns. Grantee shalt have the right to assign a portion or otherwise trawler any or all of its rights,benefits,privileges and interests arising in and under this Easement. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing,the rights and obligations of the parties shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon their respective successors and assigns. Eaument-PSE(1 11791).doe -6- . \ S U.F:,•. • • • • • • 9. Stanchion Radios.Grans expressly reserves the right to pave and/or asphalt within a radius of • five(5)feet from any stanchion,pole,tower,brace,guy,anchor,etc. Grantor's paving and/or asphalting shall not impair Grantee's ability to use the Easement Areas for the purposes set forth herein. • 10. Grantee's Constriction of New Underground Utility Lhaes.From and after the recordation date of this Easement,Grantee may not lay,install or construct a new underground utility Finn,of any type, • within the Easement Areas,without Grantor's prior written approval,which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld,conditioned or delayed.Further,Grantee may not take my action not expressly grunted herein which impacts in any way Grantor's development and use of the Property. II. Notice.All notices required or permitted to be given hereunder shall be in writing and shall be personally delivered,sent by U.S.certified mail,postage prepeid,return receipt requested,telecopy or by . overnight courier service,addressed as set forth below: (a) All notices to be given to Grantee shall be addressed as follows: Puget Sound Energy One Bellevue Center 411—10Sth Ave.N.E. Bellevue,WA 98004 Atari: Manager Real Estate Telefax: (425)462-3519 (b) All notices to be given to Grantor shall be addressed as follows: err') Puget Western;tine. II 19515 North Creek Parkway,Suite 310 Bothell,WA 98011 114 Attn: President . . Telefax: (425)487-6565 voi Either party hereto may.by proper notice to the other,designate such other address for the giving ce of notices as deemed necessary.All notices shall be deemed given on the day each such notice is a) personally delivered,Unsalted by teleenpy(with evidence of receipt)or rtefiweed by overnight courier • service,or on the third day following the day such notice is mailed if mailed in accordance with this section. Failure to deliver a copy of a notice to a"copy"party shall not effect the validity of such notice,as such copies are for the convenience of the parties only. i Dated this 15 lay ry of December,199/t. GRANTOR Puget Western,Inc. ,��p BY /�•i/"7'�` ITS President Emmet-PSE(11179114ec -T• .e:•�i iM,,ii:�� ..`,,it l:.uA»a+ �.Ys,Yr. ,.r.�f'J�-,a_' r �r '-i'' -. •,;isa...,s .:..ti %yKi/:7a: aiyJrt(.,E,yn,y1`to4i=i'L • -...- — —' �}•�!--- -~C'��r'.i.:?_S:rt:1st:+..M+:i!�e.c±=�i?.•�-sY_+.•�,s*tr:t�:y'r-.s.i::r • STATE OF Washington) )SS COUNTY OF K►,li G ) On this day personally appeared before me R.B.Boyd,to me known to be the President of Puget Western, Inc. the entity that executed the foregoing imtrwneot,and acknowledged the said Mainzeaot to be the free and voluntary set and deed of said entity,for the uses and purposes*min mentioned,and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed Is the corporate seal of said GfVEN under my hand and official seal this 15 day of Dj/Js. 1991. ��t 1111na�a (i A(. i ,:L.+ra' ,��`,4 M ......'4i Notary Public In and for the State of d' 1°211 i Residing at -LIGt.IG 5 My commission expires �N6, /�f �oOZ V! 1.4 .-4 • • i Eaar!ed-P8E(I I I74t}doe -a- • ._.__. -... '- -'.'d:-- :e*..e;•:-,.,>,;;. _ ..,;'-; - .ter '� =-a-r:cdSS: • • • • EXHIBIT"A" Order No. 380714-5X DESCRIPTION: PARCEL A: • THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 10 IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: . BEGINNING AT A POINT WHICH IS 445.3 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 17; THENCE NORTH 150 FEET; THENCE WEST 57.3 FEET; THENCE NORTH TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SOUTH GRADY WAY; .4 THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID ROAD TO THE SOUTH LINE OF Ul SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER; 01 THENCE EAST TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. I' PARCEL B: '4 THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST m . QUARTER OF SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, 0, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE SOUTH LINE OF WALSWORTH'S FIRST ADDITION TO RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 6 OF PLATS, PAGE 23, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF TALBOT ROAD SOUTH. • PARCEL C: THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 10, SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING 'ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 1 AT A POINT 52840 FEET WEST OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 1; THENCE NORTH 53.00 FEET; • THENCE WEST PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT • LOT 10, A .DISTANCE OF 232.46 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EAST LINE OF A TRACT OF LAND DEEDED TO PUGET SOUND TRACTION, LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY BY DEED RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 817107, WHICH LINE IS PARALLEL WITH AND 445.30 FEET EAST OF THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTIONS 17 AND 20; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE 313 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTH LINE OF A TRACT OF LAND DEEDED TO RENTON CO- OPERATIVE COAL COMPANY BY DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 26, 1900 UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 200930; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 528.00 FEET OF SAID'GOVERNMENT LOT 1; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE 260 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN MAIN AVENUE SOUTH (BENSON ROAD SOUTH) AS DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 2827715. Bast-PSE(I I I79q.doc .9. • ■ EXHIBIT"A" PARCEL D: THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOTS 1 AND 2, SECTION 20, ■ TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON LYING WESTERLY AND NORTHERLY OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1, AS CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON BY ' • DEEDS'RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NOS. 5732439 AND 4924770; EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN THE FOLLOWING • DESCRIBED PARCEL: THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 10, SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SAID SECTION 20, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING ON THE NORTH LIEN OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 1 AT A POINT 528.00 FEET WEST OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 1; THENCE NORTH 53.00 FEET; THENCE WEST PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 10, A DISTANCE OF 232.46 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EAST LINE OF A TRACT OF LAND DEEDED TO PUGET SOUND TRACTION, .4 LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY BY DEED RECORDED UNDER 41 KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 817107, WHICH LINE IS 'PARALLEL t, WITH AND 445.30 FEET EAST F THE-WEST LINE OF SAID SECTIONS 0 17 AND 20; (i THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE 313 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO 411 THE NORTH LINE OF A TRACT OF LAND DEEDED TQ RENTON CO- Q5 OPERATIVE COAL COMPANY BY DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 26, 1908 CI UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 200930; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 528.00 FEET OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 1; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE 260 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; ALSO EXCEPT PORTIONS THEREOF LYING WITHIN BENSON ROAD SOUTH AND SOUTH GRADY WAY; AND EXCEPT PORTION THEREOF LYING EASTERLY OF BENSON ROAD SOUTH. PARCEL E: THOSE PORTIONS OF BLOCKS 1 AND 2, INCLUDING THE UNNUMBERED • TRACTS ADJOINING THE LOTS IN BLOCK 1, WALSWORTH'S FIRST ADDITION TO RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED • IN VOLUME 6 OF PLATS, PAGE 23, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING SOUTHERLY OF SOUTH GRADY WAY AND NORTHEASTERLY OF TALBOT ROAD SOUTH; • TOGETHER WITH THOSE PORTIONS OF BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH AND SOUTH 8TH AVENUE VACATED BY CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE NO. 2850, WHICH ATTACHED THERETO BY OPERATION OF LAW. PARCEL F: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 19; TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, •LYING EASTERLY OF TALBOT ROAD SOUTH AND LYING NORTHERLY OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1, AS CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 5754046. (CONTINUED) � l Easm..d.PSE(I II79>f).d.c .Ip. s` •'ll.i. ri: :•:,....: i..['i'.yi..�.�i% i,:1.:l:<t•,i�JNi.�4.,G`47t. �i"... < y;.i:-tom; n' . . .. - Y.'. .- '.x • EXHIBIT"A" DESCRIPTION CONT. ORDER NO. 380714 I PARCEL G: THAT PORTION. OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 23 • NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING WESTERLY AND NORTHERLY OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1, AS CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON BY DEEDS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBERS 5732439 AND 4924770; EXCEPT PORTION THEREOF LYING WESTERLY OF THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF BENSON ROAD SOUTH; AND EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN THE FOLLOWING: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF THE JOHN F. BENSON COUNTY ROAD (BENSON ROAD SOUTH) WHICH IS SOUTH 25°44'34° EAST 934.11 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 1; THENCE SOUTH 0°38' WEST 369.61 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 0°38' WEST 109.14 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 1; THENCE SOUTH 88°55' WEST 183.03 FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN N4 OF SAID JOHN F. BENSON COUNTY ROAD; IA THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID ROAD, 113.23 FEET; O THENCE NORTH 88°55' EAST 157.24 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. • . 04• ALL SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. Frai m-►SE(111Af),Im .11. i • • • EXHIBIT"B" • EASEMENT EXHIBIT / / •i t / .r t.hd,r ��a/ I a eV , 7 j/ I v- .,\ :.. l'N- 7\ Ikc: . . N ,..--IA $. \ .. / J ` 1 � . illt . varawit r—. . /. ., , . .. j .. , „.., ,..... i ice. ., Ercmad-PSE(I I1791).doe -12- ' ... - . ,_._..._., r. ... _ .i•1•}+!Ex�:.�:.b.�s.i%ai:l:+,4j-'IilnGcw� • EXHWIT"C" 11 Q. I ' j Q; a: t f./ c 31 i\ cg ) I a; i f r . ...„ .._ .... .. H911 I 115 ' y1V 5 fI; ),N. i iliaalio et i F \ki �� W iiu�11i i :;i; sir a. its �j Pill i I i;- i' ;s, e� t oil 1 1 I,'. . . . .. •. , • :P1. • Jilt iWI!III' II?IW11I 111 WII ' !,d 4 I" d ".I•I i i. 1.1 [ d• 4 f r Emma*?SE(1117911140e -13- • • s , . 51 "ij.D)EVECLITY°PM0E-ENTREPNLATONIN9NIINq°i ° NOV 0 5 1999 „,. RECEIVED . • A., .21dry. -=4 • .!? • ;;' 11 • 4 ,;2,;;-;;;:::',;,F{I. '';''t`';‘,*•.' •; 4*1 ; '23•••:':::::•-:,;;g rzef,-,„;;;:, 17ECH NICALIN FO RMATI 0 N•REPORT • V:1;,•`,:47i '2;i'; .2%,44,v;v4,;7441 • ;;;;;,r • • . PROPOSED.POSED; HOMEV • •, •. • .;:‘,„,;"?.;;;:a; • .„ ' . , - • 'r•f:•;'44: • Ill a •,-•7 1 1 . .; • _4; -;-",;;zi;; • ;;4',;(,;;•;r '.C;;;; ,••;.•'• .4; • . „ . • , '4.,• ,-; , •';-" ,;4 `%'; Ys ;• .• OUR JOB NO. 6254 OCTOBER 22, 1999 Prepared By: • BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 1 82 1 5 72ND AVENUE SOUTH • KENT, WASHINGTON 98032 (425) 251 -6222 GoAu v- - lk '22 s - 1 CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES of • (t)A, r TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW 2.0 PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS SUMMARY 3.0 OFF-SITE ANALYSIS 3.1 UPSTREAM ANALYSIS 3.2 DOWNSTREAM ANALYSIS 4.0 ON-SITE ANALYSIS 4.1 DETENTION SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 4.2 WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 5.0 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 6.0 EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DESIGN 7.0 PROJECT SUMMARY r a • 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW The proposed project is located within the Northeast quarter of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, Willamette Meridian, King County. More specifically, it is located on the southeast corner of the intersection of Grady Way South and Talbot Road South in the City of Renton. Grady Way South provides approximately 750 feet of road frontage along the northwest side of the property. Talbot Road South provides approximately 500 feet of road frontage along the southwest of the property. The proposed project includes construction of an 120,000-square-foot Home Depot retail facility. The building is located on the eastern portion of the property and surrounded by parking, landscaping, and other appurtenances. Presently, on-site runoff flows are divided into two separate basins. One basin drains to the north and combines with the underground drainage system within Grady Way South. The other basin drains to the south and combines with the Talbot Road South underground drainage system. Both the Grady Way South and Talbot Road South systems combine and flow through a culvert underneath Talbot Road South near the south corner of the project and then continues to the southwest. 2.0 PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS SUMMARY According to the July 19, 1999, pre-application review letter under the heading "Surface Water:" • There is a drainage system from Renton Hill to the east, which crosses under Interstate 405 and Benson and crosses a southerly portion of the site in a combined culvert/ditch system. This system discharges into a developed pipe system in Talbot Road South. There are also developed pipe drainage systems in Grady Way South and Talbot Road South adjacent to the site. • A conceptual drainage plan and drainage report will be required for the site plan application for this project. The conceptual drainage plan shall include provisions, water quality treatment in compliance with the requirements of the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWM). • The proposal as presented will not require detention according to the KCSWM. Since there are downstream flooding problems,any increase in the release rate from this site may require detention as a SEPA mitigation condition, even if the release rate is less than the allowed 0.5 cfs increase. • If there is no net increase in impervious surface on the site as part of the development proposal, then there will be no system development charge for surface water required for this project. 3.0 OFF-SITE ANALYSIS 3.1 UPSTREAM ANALYSIS The site is essentially isolated from off-site runoff. Drainage from the north is intercepted with the Grady Way South drainage facilities. Drainage from the west is intercepted by the Talbot Road South drainage facilities. The topography on-site drains from the north to the south, therefore, there is no drainage contributing from the south of the property. Drainage from the east flows from Renton Hill and is collected within an 18-inch concrete pipe. The concrete pipe passes under 6254.005 [JMH/ca] 1 � Benson Road South and outlets to a concrete channel on site. Benson Road South drainage flows overland to the concrete channel. The concrete channel flows to the southwest along the eastern edge of the property, emptying into a 5-foot diameter culvert at the south corner of the property. Flow continues in the culvert passing under Talbot Road South to the west. 3.2 DOWNSTREAM ANALYSIS The project proposes to maintain the existing drainage basins with the proposed site features. The drainage basin on the north half of the site will drain to the Grady Way South underground drainage facilities. The basin on the south half of the site will drain to the Talbot Road South underground drainage facilities. Both the Grady Way South and Talbot Road South underground drainage facilities combine and continue traveling within the City's main system to the southwest, ultimately draining to the Interstate 405 drainage system. 4.0 ON-SITE ANALYSIS 4.1 DETENTION SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN The developed site conditions result in less impervious surface than the pre-existing conditions, therefore, a stormwater detention facility will not be required for this site. With less impervious surface in the developed condition, the resulting release rates from the site will be less than the existing rates. Therefore, according to the pre-application review letter, detention will not be required as stated if the release rate is less than the allowed 0.5 cfs increase. 4.2 WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN The proposed site conditions divide the site into drainage basins, one to the north and one to the south. Both drainage basins' surface runoff will be treated in bioswales. For the drainage basin to the north, the bioswale is located between the parking and Grady Way South. The bioswale for the south basin is located south of the parking lot between the parking and the concrete drainage channel along the eastern edge of the property. 5.0 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN All of the proposed conveyance systems for the project have been analyzed and designed to accommodate runoff produced by a 100-year, 24-hour storm event generated within the associated tributary areas. 6.0 EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DESIGN Erosion and sedimentation control facilities will be provided according to the SEPA checklist in accordance with King County and City of Renton standard requirements. 6254.005 []MH/ca] 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW King County Department of Development and Environmental Services TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Part 1 PROJECT OWNER AND. *Part.;2 ,PROJECT LOCATION.AND PROJECT ENGINEER DESCRIPTION Project Owner Project Name , 1 \-kw \k,Pf r HONAE_ DE an- Address Location S,L,Cam, of GizAakt UJ/ay T,L T 3 0o \1J AetivaiJ Au., Phone cDeANbE�CA c1SECZ Township Z`� 1.1 b 1.0 y --1G-Ov • Range S e, Project Engineer Section AL key uPLL. Company I .Ae6J—iA.rsi_ LNG-,��iEl✓� Address/Phone kC,.,? \i .(42s)'2SI-6222. Part 3 TYPE OF PERMIT APPLICATION Part 4 OTHER REVIEWS AND PERMITS: Subdivision DFW HPA Shoreline Management Short Subdivision COE 404 Rockery Grading DOE Dam Safety Structural Vaults Commercial FEMA Floodplain Other Other COE Wetlands Part 5 SITE COMMUNITY AND DRAINAGE BASIN Community Drainage Basin iZ�� Part 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS River Floodplain Wetlands Stream Seeps/Springs Critical Stream Reach High Groundwater Table Depressions/Swales Groundwater Recharge Lake Other Steep Slopes F1c ug.w_ 1 JOZKSlmET ldF3 I Part 7 SOILS.. Soil Type Slopes Erosion Potential Erosive Velocities Additional Sheets Attached Part 8 DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS REFERENCE LIMITATION/SITE CONSTRAINT Ch. 4—Downstream Analysis Additional Sheets Attached Part.9 ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION AFTER CONSTRUCTION Sedimentation Facilities >C Stabilize Exposed Surface X.Stabilized Construction Entrance X Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities X Perimeter Runoff Control X Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris Clearing and Grading Restrictions X Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities Cover Practices Flag Limits of SAO and open space preservation areas X Construction Sequence Other Other ZoF3 Part 10 SURFACE,.WATER SYSTEM K Grass Lined Tank Infiltration Method of Analysis Channel Vault Depression X.Pipe System Energy Dissipater Flow Dispersal Compensation/Mitigati on of Eliminated Site Open Channel Wetland Waiver Storage Dry Pond Stream Regional U�A Wet Pond Detention Brief Description of System Operation J GCc",aq Cps 4r4C-121 Facility Related Site Limitations Reference Facility Limitation Part 11 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS Part 12 'EASEMENTS/TRACTS Cast in Place Vault Drainage Easement Retaining Wall Access Easement Rockery>4' High . Native Growth Protection Easement Structural on Steep Slope Tract Other Other Part 1.3 SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER I or a civil engineer under my supervision my supervision have visited the site. Actual site conditions as observed were incorporated into this worksheet and the attachments. To the best of my knowledge the information provided here is accurate. Signed/Date �FZ SENECA? CM . . n , J� . AV "A2 r� I N �I i =i;�c AV SW SE,ECA AV N • SENECA 1 •S'op: ..", C eq°�£� ^}s -i /� `� L 1= T i= q t _ AV SW CENo P SW lc=i SFA - S�NECA,k NW CSF 1 t LND NV 1,;tis � \.= __. T Ht F�4 V NW /AV c1900 t _ W_� 44 . 1 I -' •Pt ;1 �`� Ar V? SW I STEVENS#1AV '. MAPLE _ i AV SW p` £ gl,Sly •�' o,-ss_LIND !AV SW L ND qVVIO 400 zVD : ..N 1 d • O�d� o°°A o i { liv o LoZ MAPLE AV } NW TAYCOR.iAV �.. :. ..t`p.' ' \ ® rci z c7 AYLOR Ably ''1 :�G. .. Q.... : :P `: AV SWti y i , „:.• LI \-4-.::.*:RD'. ''....i:'...;7A4. ' a ',:::-..:.,. , . . -4 '1. HARD•I•E _?�: \a y fiAROIE t� AV iAU SW . ti o tSS,,,i �31� : n ` / M +'' s �. o /Ib�� INI�/2i . z c)k3N AV �3. 005Z..� .: . sro.A .� ,..-•" ,, W LAKE AV !LAKE AV to o''S ny. ..: : :ham N .. . � SHATTUGK °:AV..�:v� :'- � �'�, v� tt� n _ �N. SIr�O y ‘ �, :: ;;`s N �. 400: p+; - "" :SH CK AV "� S t l . Z a , • ` WIIITWO'1}I AV $l ' i___ft< pia z`1— 1• Z 1 aj .. • 2 yam- I•A . :C(C:: m oW+ AV -1 b Z 1 S' 1500: :cn:.. '_ y. ;?J MORRIS• �,� ,-t O ; S Cr) f -i —I b -t ITWi.. , '• Z .• O ` r i• •I=•AV �I I O O MORRIS.' :AV : S 4 _-�` AV S i's.L C .'� O i ` • :0: S ,--1 y Z t •q .. MORRIS" iV,,• �• 1r-'. i�'"- \L� ,::? x A SMIT ERS • ` AV S • 200 AV II • �; �_, �Qn co.:..I �.•iN S, a p - opt LOGAN Z S a.f = !N . SMITHERS m m o� , V b 1 (0� ra , in -' AV E . -,, 5.�yi. �. *fit•. z ' sg .yam' ` 00'. B a -i • 1. p0 -� $ a fn N a a .. S. =.-t,4. , -v . . WILLIAMS a V �r -- ��- ` — . y'IA: � . n� r A , J J �. . • .... vi _S'::.:........-� tr y N ; imp S z f� 3 j' BURI ETT4��' -. * **' u ELLS �AV o `:o,' , . f� ! y • ` � ,•► 00 .N A S �, :aa i a WI�'LIAMS l���a NOSN3a ::ti,, M1 AU i �o;, cn �JJ;��°�, �ti `� _ ,.; A \Ilikrk ; FqG�. • • :� .. . MILL. ii•. A`I' . -„:R v / Z ! PEL • CEDAR AV P • !/Ny. \ AV,j j • • • • \ z� ^ cn 301� c� S •( RENON No �' • L oo'-i Jw o1- I�N GRANT: �' AV.$ , '0, 3 0 \ :, �, o f,ti :7:w _ � .',� , CARD o!= A • b It0 , O. 0M I`'� EA D l s � 0 �M"`_ W 0 �f0: H AV' H S�: A V •q db D� S N , A :: - F . R, 4�. 700 \, i 0 z 0 ,:. . .' ':"S. ,a.,...-' ::?.�':.'. FACTOR AV A t _, JONE "`��S AV S z • N N b: • ig • • a ,F. m ,,.:... z'I-, �a ,' � i,,, oat, Y �r� E �,1 R. \ !N V C N r JO -•I n `� t' a � t --f � ,�5" JONES v, p a �.�_ �'� A ,a '�� N,S` fri J0C'-.FryN KE INE.ICK CT SE r I I f�::. ': 'a; 11l : q` i e \�: B(Iy - i Z LIN \ { CON '\1 L M 3 ,J ,Z tjCIR SE LINGOLt�CT SE Jr ar: �}4' H MON • s �'� I 5 Av TER L = N E _4 •._s EY � _.vl aif D . ... , . a L_CAPR r r t_0 4� t r R.4 E. R.5 E SEaTTLE (CITY P o l Io nv.112'30" 6 A4, rq INr ni SOS ERg rn r� ,�,� l (Joins sheet 5) a ll9 ` I i,. -- r!,__ .__-_-___ ...*._, : \ B U � dam' r :Mawr •. • • [j'J' I \.•\{•:iti;:t.:i<;:;::• .\`::..s:":.' .per, ��, • Ss. u D'aal ri. 11. ...� ' II �a;�,r:�.r:r: � ur , � ��� Igh�Hl "'I.?. .-2. •: % 1 i : 1 .:' ..___ EnallbA 7 u, %Cr-11r, gami. Vg....7t0iit---;,I.t.....'I ;"Ilk: /f 'I isr4j . d / , P %' :. f �.__ � Ag :,..&rC� it I .� f—: 1 ••E T•• � II �, \-- ;C River n. h ' R•o• •� '�- coop,-4,:, .,- ,4,. . :....... .[:: 'L---;. . 1. I i---r.- . ® I ,y 4 11 •_ , i.rates‘,7,-_;-„, J I •l ✓.��`—,. .:i , . .,., L I� �I. _ I 1�1 �� Atht �\ 9 J II % • �C� f i `; it !�� f 4410 r,/ • • � \� 61_ I':I4rJ I— * Ur ' •AkF I .,,,,:far� — Al \ ' •■ _ ` • __ �INN 1 ioo.) .1- ..• ---;. . '‘Iii,. --.40-1. 0E444 Irma E C , •- as.— —.............. arz. ,.....:: seblf/ ILI\! Cern: I GRAVEL EL` Park254 p,...„1 w,_,\.__ __',.6321/ :C 711-411110W A' \\./ It :11110 ,t,._ \_/ ii\i" BeD P%/� \,ihr- 17 i/ail� �,1��•*I�i II o \ AkF E 1 --•14 OS\ 1 I i . 441 .., _-_;,:j. % 1111*1,1 ,.. 1 . s 4 : ur I.AILq .• j � -! �' �• �„I�I! le W • AkF • j��,10 it __ o ® Pu Ir \ 0 ::4 1 :. Golf�ourse I ., 1 i i, { sta /// .1.\ ,,,.... AgC 1: F — — I 4 5 _� \Ur I T fittli ��' f1E' \-% I�. ' Sew._ ORT �em-'� � �r� 00, 1\4111111 sire ��ir►o Disp. -O.Ir:.> . al 5- WL �i • 5E7' ..-substa lla Q• n 1 Ps ` Ng \ / • ���� I� • ... ki • • AgC , • !` • =M 16 1 91 . I. ' 455�I j�-,-ice 1 Pu ! ` :\ /s s. � N { wL01)1 !! .,-._2► . - .---I •. -.- -_ . - SOILS MA? • 5C3- KING cout4TY *Nokni No 5c4La acE 2t C254 FwuRE.3 Soils MAP 2.0 PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS SUMMARY l -� CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM . DATE: JULY 19, 19999 TO: LAUREEN NICOLAY'' / FROM: NEIL WATTS 1V1f W SUBJECT: PREAPPLICATION REVIEW HOME DEPOT PROJECT We have reviewed the above listed project and have the following comments: WATER • There is an existing 18" water main in S Grady Way, and a 16" water main in Benson Road S. There are also several 8" and 6" water mains and four hydrants located on the site itself. • No additional water main extensions will be required for this project. • It is anticipated that the redevelopment credit for this site will eliminate the requirement for payment of system development charges for water and sewer. SEWER _ - • Service to this site is provided by an 18" sewer main which runs across the southerly portion of the site from the east and into the system in Talbot Road S which then runs south before turning west across the Renton Village site connecting to the METRO Interceptor at Rainier and Grady. • No additional sewer main extensions will be required for this project. • It is anticipated that the redevelopment credit for this site will eliminate the requirement for payment of system development charges for water and sewer. SURFACE WATER • There is a drainage system from Renton Hill to the east which crosses under I-405 and Benson and crosses the southerly portion of the site in a combined culvert/ditch system. This system discharges into a developed pipe system in Talbot Rd S. There are also developed pipe drainage systems in S Grady Way and Talbot Road S adjacent to the site. • , • 7 1 JuLY 19, 1999 / PAGE 2 6 • A conceptual drainage plan and drainage report will be required for the site plan application for this project. The conceptual drainage plan shall include provisions water quality treatment in compliance with the requirements of the KCSWM. • The proposal as presented will not require detention, per the KCSWM. Since there are / downstream flooding problems, any increase in the release rate from the site may require detention as a SEPA mitigation condition, even if the release rate is less than the allowed 0.5 cfs increase. • If there is no net increase in impervious surface on this site as part of the development proposal, then there will be no system development charge for surface water required for this project. • TRANSPORTATION • S Grady Way is fully improved with curb, gutters, sidewalks and street lighting adjacent to this project site. Benson Rd S is a paved two lane arterial, with gravel shoulders and no curbs or sidewalks adjacent to this project site. • City Code requires a project of this size to abut fully improved streets. This will require the_ Gdd� improvement of Benson Rd S adjacent to the site with curb, gutter and sidewalks for the entire nnfi , 1i y frontage of the site. A request for waiver of this requirement may be made to the Board of 1"' Public Works. • A traffic report should be prepared for this project. This traffic report should address possible impacts to the signalized intersections at Talbot Rd S and S Grady Way and Rainier .01 �'�1� `,Av. S and S Grady Way. A traffic analysis should also be prepared for the proposed 1 , I _1Q[Y driveway onto S. Grady Way, with particular emphasis on discussion of the viability of left Ca , turning movements in and out of the site. Trip generation values should be estimated for both 1,, the proposed use and the prior/existing uses on the site. .+-rI r ?cut /v7� • r ''" • Traffic mitigation fees of$75 per net new average daily trip will be required for this project. GENERAL —�6 i7`� - C5P. 3 dl'1'`� ' y � • The site plan application for this project must include a conceptual utility plan showing all • existing and proposed utilities, including sewer mains, manholes, water mains, valves, hydrants, drainage facilities, drainage mains and catch basins. All existing utility easements on the site must also be shown on the site plan. A complete conceptual drainage plan, with a Level 1 downstream analysis and p2.ropriate calculations for water quality treatment facilities and detention requirements shall also be included in this application. • All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a registered Civil Engineer. The construction permit application must include a itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,00 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. 3.0 OFF-SITE ANALYSIS 3.1 UPSTREAM ANALYSIS R• OFF-SITE ANALY$'io'vRAINAGE SYSTEM TABLE Surface Water Design Manual, Core Requirement#2 Basin: Subbasin Name: Subbasin Number: :..::::::::::::.:. :................................:.:.:..... .........................9................i?..............::.::.....Sl. . .........D•.stance..:........:.::.Exrstr. .»>::><�:<:;<:<:>:«<:.:•. ..................................:.:..:.:.:..:.............................................................. ........R.... ............................... .:...... . ... .n ....................Pote.ntia.l.:::::.;::;•...: bse:vatr .s:. . > r i .: . ......:..:.:::. .... .......................... ....... ...........:............................................:.:...:.:.....................:..................................:.:...:......::....9......... ........................................:. .:C?..... ..r... .:.00. ..of..f..e..d...tn.s .ecto.c :::.::::::::.:::.::..:::..:............. ...........Y. ...........................................�.............................. ................ .........Q.... . . te..............pr. biattts..................P�a� Tema.::::.�:..::.. :. ... :.;. :: ..:............... ...................:.::.:.:.................... ............................:..:.,.:.:.,:............................................ .....:..........::...:.:........ ..............Q...................... ..................>�.. .. ,.......:. ..teso.ur.. .e..r. .�rrewer`..or.:r i Name _a. ;S ................................ .:............................................... .......................................... ................ ........:...:........................c�fi8..dcbch9.ttf1Q�1'.s� . .. ... .h n .........................:........................:..:....:...................... ...::...:map....::•:.:.;;strearrt,;channei,. I ..;<•::.::.:;.;;..drg►na :basin:. anon:.�1ve.:•;:.::.; ;:.;:•;96:.:•;:;..:::. . . .x:... .. ........:.:...:... :.........:.:.::.:.........:....p.P.a,..... .....:.:...:..::.8�......... : .................r....................: .:iC4..tni....1. o.:ft:<:<::::overta in <::n i :haEsitui: •: ....:::.:. :.........:............:..:....: ..::.:::..::.:............. ...................::::.:.:.::c.:::.. .:....:.....,...........,...... ................ .........:.:.,.::��. ............ ,...b0d.rt ..............4r...nr atria .:::;<:;>:::<;:� b m.<a.ea�<t(Kell :.at: a •><:::>::: .....�:.::::::.:.:.. .... ...........:. ........ ............. ............ .::::::.�:::.�:.:..:...................................:..........�.:..:.:.�::::.::::.:.:,:...:P.i?.,.�.............8,....................:.8...:.::n't:.::::::.::t►�..yt..ry...t.... .......It4dt1..... .fobt.m:..:: ..:..::::.:::.::::. .....P.4....�:..tz..,:dlemeter�>:::::c::.d. ih.. ;at::seneatfve:area��:Vo(ume;<.:::::::::::::;::.::::.�::.:::.�::::::::.::.::,::.:.:.::::. � � :.; •.;::.;: .:.::..::...........:.................. ,..:.::.:.::::::::,::....................:.......:......:::::::.:.:.�:::.:::::.:.................. ................ ................:::.::::::.:::::::..::...................,............. ................ .:... ::..:. .....overtiow. at •.: tenilal.:tm acts::::.. . ... ....:...setlimentallon•. is a.. :.::... ...:...:...:::::::.:.�:::.:,.::::::<.:.:.�:::::::::.:::.:..:.�:............................................::::.:::,:::.;:.;:<.:;;;.;:.:. ::.;:;.:�:.;:<;.;:.; • • L1Table,doc 11/2/92 . i 3.2 DOWNSTREAM ANALYSIS l . 4I 416 2LF2-1 21.E2-5 • 2LF2-2 •/S IS [-- 17TH IWV'. 3 /21F2s3I I J/21f2-aL i I 21.E2-a / LE2-2 .1/FI7E2 iP j �� > - zLlf2� 21112-1 S IT E / 21.E3-11 \ �Ldi 2W3-I 21143-5 2153-7 / kl • `-9 • 2153-16 21G3-S ` 213/3-4 153-9 • 2153-11 •ce 21d-9 21F3-4 ' 2LG3-1 21.53-17 . 21G3-10 . 21f}3 2U13-3 1 �9 2LF3- 21G3-2 -U13-B 2 —_•' T N 21.E3-B— GRAD 21. 1E3-7 -� d-�• . • •2153-13 .2153-12 21)13-2 • 21f3-1 LE3-6 S •2153-14 21113-6 • '-1 • 21.44-17 •2LF4-12 •21.53-15 \ 2LF4-1 • 2153-, 2U1l-16 21}13-10 / 21.64-14 • 21G4-11 2LG4-4 / a"- • •• 21G4-6 —2U1a-♦ 2LF4-4 •• 2154-12 / •��� 2L114-15 21}14-11 • 2154-13 I 21Gl-7 1 • 21.G4-I ` I 2LGa-d 21y14-18 21I 4 9• I 2l.G4-5 21.54-3 21 7 2U14-6 21f a-IU P1 -g / 21F4-11' • 2LF4-5 I 2Ud-l3 2U14 19 21G4-2 S RENTON VILLAGE PL ' 21H4-I4 2•E4-2. 21f4-6• 21f,-7 21144-2 2LE4-3 21F4-e 21W-9 .-21N4-3 -LF4-1 21W-10 r-4���,at�'1 21H4-I 21.E4-4 23 we ~•••—•••- f,-2 \ 21.55-12 2LG5-13 21 E4-1Gel I-405 21G3-Il M'H3-6_ �2L75-11 1 H'�• VI I---- \ \ �2U6-10 21f5-4 /' I r �' - • I I f zUC_e• iTt 1• I I•iz--� 21.G5-:.15THI 3 Gs I _ 21.55-6 • \ I I I`21.55-1 I 21.G5 4 •\15-5 1dI' tIi . f/1 b II VII_2156-5 it H 1 2"`I I I�+ I 21,16-9 ExbAtarr 'A." l 21G6-2 � S;16TH UT .1 j •moj 1 I 12UK-5 2LH6i 21J16-4 3. fri 1 21 � _7TH r I SIT DowlLlTtt>s'AM •2LFlrl ; 2 0 2LH6-3 • p z.AtgAGE MAP • •l 4.0 ON-SITE ANALYSIS . 4.1 DETENTION SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN •,,";";,. ...,....,.:•:., ,I//// : .,......,:::.,.::g:.-4 2 I, // // s...1") :"•*:.....;...:*.i. .1' ._/ ,I, ,// / 1 1 14...;1„;:i;• ''•:f, , ;:...,•,,-. .-,,,,/,,/,,ii,„/%/fy/ // I / 1,./" •..r • / 1 7/7,y/6// ,// I / ! , ....;..,::.,....1:,•:::,•:k 4,/,,/.,„ /,,,,,,,,/,/ ), / i / , „ •• :•:.i.„„ „•,./,/,,,, ,,,,f,iiiIii i , I , I ! .; -. ,,,-.•i..1.,•,..! , V C 1.--,.., ., /./i/ilifiliiiiiiiiltililfr i ' , i ! ,,•5..),I•••••••;7\•:..f.:3.:',,...:.: 0 / ...... 2.,? (YAC`c%'00iiilli .4////////:-. ...-1.-- I,'''••••••..E1.11„.::i.‘:......:::::."..'.. ' .,.',":...!•.:1„'/////71/7,1//rificl,11i/11,1/11/11///-/E 'i !'.'::.••;•14 1.'•'',..:"...'1 0 •''/ :?.4//2,1/////,///,,///////111/11/1,11,1/4,4,/////./.../ta. ^q ,,".•..:::,...::::f,l'i:•,:::•••••"" 73 /, ,///17.,.:•:',.. ".....7/7/,`,/,''';',/,?/;//';,1,,':',%,";;"/,',,27;,//,`2//if 4::):/'".//;71,:',..- ) '.'-':...''•. :.:..:,ttr.177::.,,•,* ,,/,..,.:,.........:.........fiv/////7/4///,/////dm /// •., ),, -.-.•... :•,::.!:••4. ..t:,....,....::...:..1, (1) 4 7...y.:'!. :::::.:•.i,:•'. //i ) ) ..'.••'. 1 I i':'•..4.•:.1.::.•••• :: /' i i..'•'.........' ',.:;.:,/,,V,/,/ ti yil i,,1 # i ,/„//, ,. .•.:. •._.:, -1! !....:,.:!':....!..1,••••.I,..... t, .‘:-.."//,,iiillijilll.f!li..*:.! 0/ / '.,•., ..,..':. . ,,I.. .:••.,1.. ....i.:... .• ‘ 0 ox 0 M > ,•,,;.• ••:•: .,•.: ,•,•/•,•(,,,if ,, ., ..7,•,•,..„.7 fi• •':•13.,.,;4•.':'.''.:••.' % ft 0 / /-.1 ,/.//// /1 ill i'i'1,1/ i I 1 A A i'•.\N.-4 ' .:•':•:1,:::1:1:1.s.:::. ..... % ' ' ' ' 7//////,////////////.1/.//1/1 r,,/.; •.-.• -.1. • s• . :.;:::..:I*. it.::::.:....:.;,.'.'1..::,/,'/./.1//////6/4 ///1 1 1;1;II i' • • • ". .. • • . :.:'':,:.. 1..".:......:Y//,1 7 1 I i /I'el///:i Ill .1 II III I i •..•.• ' " • • ....:1... .: LI ITI / (....1..1 1 i.4:'1.;:..".....:/// .// ,//..)))11;11 I);1 i I i 1 I I(,,i 11; I 1 41 - • '. %.::..•.•.. i:. 1.: ell 1 1 1'.•- - . .'... t.'I .' . 1 • //li fi/?V•.:.:.....•............,;0•;'Zi.:1/..:',..„ ,.//j .!/%•':./,./.<,,)i//1)_ ///t/ '...'.••.••. ,.c"*••• . ...;',:'';.1,•;... \ ,' 7 i!•• ..,,,.,..:Av././////////:,•i i'..!.//.//,//;.• 7/j 1 •.•-*-•• .. • .4 '' ' r..:I•...'....: '-1•%•:- X L. W , .//,•///`/i 4.:::.':':::'///1 %/, ',•••///.../..41/;',"/'///,i'' i '/ .') • • - • ' ^•^4: f .-.1 ••'.':''' t / /->•-••••....../..-.././.);.r.../..,...,,/ tii if i . • - •.•.-. / • •... ••.•:J.,. -------Ds /,./lii/..//•//.//•'/;•,/•;11.,:i'', -.1. ../1 //..//.:/./.;,;.?/..,/,•,..'%.,.. .....,.••••,•••••:>'/•••.1', ri(i • ,,,.,-,•••.-t.,....,. .4 7 .t.,. /1 I'I '-'..;%?'/A;4/...• ••:"'.:4 /,'`///.•'•'./ '''•' .•.//..2..A\1)(111 i •;'*--.7-,...:-.- ^ .4 • ; :•:•t).•s•:AV / /4 I i '',41::..•. ..'•:P0.i.'', . /1.. .( • ..... ,/9-/ i 1 lij i i 1.i.'",,.'.''''.-,'"-44 1.*:....: \)•••• ,.:',.:2.... /,.. 1 f , i //\, ),,,,,•••,.. 7//////;://;,/,..07.`x, ; ////////• ••• 1 ..)th. .• ....cr /„.,44,;_,_-,-_,.,,:..,.) ( ..0•41•:1•.• .i( i , ) \ \ \VW::,,'••••,./thy,o,////,',',/,-,./( .i iv - ,•;,-,..J • • . „ ,,,,-, : ... :: ...„....:,:, . / 1 i \ \ ').#1'.,••••`,•:•:...`•••//,•/;',','/////7/1/1(I 1: I) I I/ 4...•.•. -.;,-....-1,..1.. ,-,' / I I, i • -••2,q.le4...3 / i ,..1 i 1 i 1.--)--Y,,,.../:::.:•:4,';,'/Y•iiiifirieNiii'/,////.',.-:-•-.-.••-..------/';• ; 1 r. ••••• ••'-.:1 -./...-.1.........„., ,,,-,- ..:....‘..s...... .,....:,::::.::: . _ /- _ ., ,-..--1!„ial:-....,•,.: ,,,,,,,,,,//),,,i)// ,/, .•.,,,,. • -.,,z-' , .. _ ,, ,,, , .,.,...;........:,:,,......:....... ,,,,,.,\,--.\.sc-'11,4,::•••••••••,..:•:', '77,/iliilli/iiiii ' •••,K,,•1-.:-...**A-',--,', 7/ .,,,//, -,:,2•;.-.-:--,,..:01?•:,,....,•:,•,4,/..,,,,,,,,,ii„,,,/,,,,i.///, ,••.,.-. , .. , . / ../,,,,,-;22.2/4, •- ,,,),,,,,,/,„,,,,ii tii,./ fr ,...,../... , .,e , i,,,,,, / ///,. , ,,„,,-; -- ,-• •_, „,,,,,,iiiii; ,,,,, ,,,,,. . . .,..,.. ,,,,,,r ., LI .... , ,.... , :/,:" .:.; ,,/,.,-/,/, ,1•'' (''.:1::'/.:,.•Vilibili,////17/,///////, ''' •„• .." i 1 i i' .::'...'.&.'..•.:.%•::ri.'i: / .. / / 1 1 //'(,1/4.c ..\''.iP.,•::'..1./.././(,///i ill,1 i 1'/ I-,.'•,,• ' I i /-.• / ••••//,' ," I/i \,‘J.,,';',.'4'••. - /„/..//•/./// 'I /I'/ 11^ 'r,/.. ..'' (,, i,.., ,•,(,,,..-iiiiit•.f.'.5.'•:'.../ ./1/)f 1//t. i;'I''''• '7/' . O -0 \.-./ . . ., . .... • - . .... . . .. . z.J / ./ / ‘///...../0-:....:.f*.,•/ li%'..,,.•/,••'.//..//./ ,`,/•91-,,./ ,,, , , i / ..',...„;;..,:::...,•:::,..!,,,.:...::!....,. / '., . / • /,,, 0,,%,?.•.:•:-!:?:y/':.6/;•••./.-/••••••/::... ".. •:.. ..ydr..,,,,, / ,,,./ /'. A / / / / /,/ /../,. ,,,,/ 44..................:,11,,, .',,,,/,,,,•:.-,:::.. ...... ..:.--,•;..":„, .... .:., / ••• .....••••7 / ',, '• • . .•;,..:g:!;;!•vp',///y/qi...2/:•/.../..2.7. , , , , 1 , •• • • • , ;,.......j.. ....: : .•,, , . .... . .. , // ....:: , ////,',././,./ ,/4.........":.)/k/v, ./. ••••••i..</.."..`y , - ••••• •. ....,•••• 1 // i///,///--- .,.......,/,/,y,/,,//,/,/,....:••.://2•:/ ...`7 s . / /.,, ,•. //,,, •ii. /i ......./ / .ii:',''', ,,/i../,//1/// //,•;,,,..., ,•,'/ .•/ .- ../) .• I„, ,''. ,/ • '•• ,/,,,•!,,-...1/,4/1/11,`/,/./..,• 1 1 , tV ///i f 11... "./ .:t.,IT::: ,..•...... '1'7 ''...1.,I//ill,/I,/,,1/;7 ......_:,/,„_ ___,,..,.. 4 ,___..1,...77,77777.77. 7 .';.•••..-: ,,t',.1... ... ... „... ;..••:-..) , •/// ji'---------'-- '1( 7/,..',:i...• '7.8.; -, ;7. .' , ''.7.-7- 777.17....7 ''ts.":Fi7,•,.........'....;•:;:..:•••.E....:::;•:..:::.;:.:1•X'...:::'::-:••••:-.•!•,:...:••,"•,:.!.....„....;i::::c;::.••:..":;:...,•:,.;;••• li.....„:::::::T:....•.:,•::.•:.‘•:.•..,..._,, / ,/.••4 e,...... .:,. ,,,..•,.',' ' ///i,(7//./.7."/I i'1 I ,i ....:::•..•••. .•..:-,.-,:: :....:..,•....• ....:.'...:•,...::.:"....::: ...:..,Z • ...,.,::: .,.....*,]..:.'i•::.•c•:?...'....:!:::..:.•<:.'.::::•i'.•'.', 4-;..••:....:.::•:'.....:...:"••• \ /,7( \ __,L ji 411.1.• 111.••'•• •'' ;1 i•I f i•////7/ •!.....'.!.,..".••f,,.7 7::r'..7.':',7',!7',".7.1'7>;".:•....•';••.,'';.-•:"....•.'..!.., •••. .,.:4.,..•:!:..!........4•.?i•••"•-.••1•:,•:'.:•.•' ••.:.i,....•..,....,. ,.........\ ':.•'•. .'• ....' /I \\ *..7'/' • /7'''..I%I 1/!'f i(/ ? ••. .I.::/...;•i i I/:;.•''•?•!)'•':::::'.>•:•-.:',2.:- ..?,'...7::•,1•?...;•".!;•:.'.;.:.;. ,. ..s.,•+!.-:::.'1.kf!.:••,:;, •;,.:;:2•J,..:•;.,,,:•••.....!.:::::.•:,•••.:::::...:...1 , .c.."-.i":\•-•...!...:• ...:...• \ / .•:: 1 .\, .//-* ... ....:•//‘..//4:1•.:.... i'l 1 1 ii i 7/I I i 7".. 1 .:`:c.:,!...:::......2.4.C.4'1';"4"".`:. ''''."'•• ''''.--.4.-': •i•••f•'••t...'..:'';'•.f...t!..7.t:'•':: h.1::.7. 7:•:;.::,:••1:::.::.!:::':.A..:1•;':'•:::::i•::::;.,...7 .:'...:'•.;.:..114 1 ....ii!:::::!...A'..•''..":..;!:(::!... \ / • 2'1" ' /il/i//.//it/,'.,..i.:;it i)::,,,,,'', , '„ .2 ' i...::,..\T...:.......:.,....:::.'.:,....,:,.: ;....i„1,-:;i:. . •- ' '' '''' ' '. ' - ... .' /.?_,s I p;,II////,.////1/"4....''..f .„'//////.////i,,//f I i.?..:i.:..!......\.' f7:77.,;.".;!..7...:.:?:'::••••:'.:.''';.,...!....'.. .::.;7:2?..''Z;:a:'::: ':':;'-''7.'';•:',.4..?'e.:..',...::!::•!.-..,:... ...f..;4.!.:.,:.:.i,.........:...;:..„,::::::;‘,...4..:,•-I ...':', \,'.:::1'.::.:‘...•.... , n .. /:'/;,/:'/i ite•Y ?....: / %/•'•••//.1/•//'//1/i;'''..:::•.:'.1'::1::::';--.•:•ti..:,!...:::::::.•....c.,.?..:::,.......,E;L:4,;.:0,,,,.,i),:ar.:.-,,:.;:t“.,..4 .-$....,,-;:,-.,,,,...........::::.;z:... "••>.,-.'.... .•::.•: \•. ..,',.......,..s.•::::::%,......., I //rt.,'"..r.,;:•::,.....;:,•.,./;,f'//4.),/ ,•••••.:.•'......:::;',/•'..ili!!''..'7/ t, y,././14,"•-i;.::.--,,-.::;•,..,:g,,,y.s...:::::(: ,.'.4:::::if M.;.•• .%••,i,.?'':••---;v',..11.1:::,::.i:.!,•::.:.:,•••••'iia:..•••,.,,•.:•.::7.:•::..::%:„:::::,..: '= ..,:..i....... -..........%::. ....... . )"-.:'.•':.': ith' •• • ' i'.4.••:...'..,1,i: ...,....•2::...:•••,:' :....• ...,.,..,::..-.,.:s.).-'?x,....T....i.;:;•;i :•.!..,•:.,•:::.•:.,•.:::?:,:?:..,!;.:.:,,., ....::a,,,••,:::...:,-,:17......A.•-• :.... :. •:....:::. ..•:.:: /....'////1 , ••..',....,:ilw.),,,e:.•,•....:Y./, /,/,,/,///./;( • ---'-•:•::•:. .-,.(;;:,.....,,,,.,.:...,•:'.::::,••••••••.•••:•••[•,.. :.•:.:. -;:.....- ..; ........•: -4.4......:....:,..,.z.:).::,.. ::i:::,••,.?::•..•••:,,:.,•:::..:::..4::::.:- ,) •,.: .....,..:.:•:,:A...•:::-:.:.....,•••..--..- I //,'•.7;;: !* '. I '1 i,j1 ,/:•'',.:;,••.:••:...z,.. •,f/1,/ , /, ,:-e••.,,,:•,...,,,::::',.:%,.....:•:::„,. ........... ''"'• . ' ,..: .••••4...•.. .•::..,• ..,.:..:.?''..:.....'..,0...'•::::::!*••'. ..1'...:•..:.*:•*:,.,.,,:g,:::•••:.,:•••:::.g.,...-...2$4:''' / .'":.:?.:•':.•••\ ......,..:6:•:i:i,•i:',....':•,,•••• ,,,i/iza..'1.,/•,4":",,,'-'3..k....."-•'....c../ ,,,'S'•••••••::',.':•;::./, I •••///''.... :.:ii••:,•:: ::1•:••••:•!:../•:,.:. ....•,.•:•••,.•:....•'-'' •••2•::.•::?.....:;:•:.......•."'•c tgall:,•••,..,;:;,,....,,,..,•••.:.:::::::•,;:o .4ei / :••••:.:..:....,:...,..:•,7,.,.....:.,,::::;.::.:................. '•••%-A'Al k'z'-';''•:•'•---" •0'.:..::::::•,.:::'V Fg'i ' /i_:-././A,::1::•:•:....,•:::•-.P:•;:::.......... . .'•.. .:.:'?. ..•!:.....i..:.1:.::•::•i:•:.;:•...:,:.i;: i;;:i:.........:;>.,,......- ,•••'•:':':':IiiiM ‘3„•:,14..:!.. ,,,•,...-•;:,......._.•;;.„•!:„i 1 , e..: .•:;..7 ,./..2,-,„////!! „/„. .,..,,.,AJ..k.:!:.,::.,,)..;:.;::.:•••, p .s•-•.',..:.•••••:.:•.. .... .,...:..,....-:,. . ,:„.....,.,„:....,, Iist . -..,"....ii.1:,. /.1 1...,----' •.::•'::.:. :::,‘,.. •::',••,. .:',:,.:.':,...'.....:....':: z///////,/, - .::‘ \< .,..!•:. .:,...,. /7,,/,,...) / //i/.......:..;,.. ..•:,-.....,.--,?.:::,14!:.,:::,:,,,::::.„...:„.....,,:„/ ,,,,,,,,/.....,,.4.?••':',,',..?...;,'•:;••.: ,••.tvi ,4-."....,.:,::?.'',/::•,:',,, ••••t,',."*.• ,:.....)... -,-.-;:%:'::".\•. //,/,117/4///iii ::.. Li' j,l,.....i". •;"/.::/ 177./7 "..---...,•'•:::',/ ,••••.*:••::::.&•;:••iiii:.A.,..1.::::;:"..a:Ri.i:;.i..ii:1 i:':•:":•:•Y:::'•.:::.." ...:'.• , ...,,i.'". • • -'';' ,."7...•.::..::•..:!•:..:-....'. V."''',..-.1".•!.4 j by/1/(14'1'1/M41 .:„..', ,A..-'...••"•„••••••••:.''' /2.;//k/'/"./-,.-'•••:;./,"7."''"''''.....'..!•1*.:::......,...4.:k7:•::.:ii....... .';•,•:':;:5-';:'..`..?.2........•••.".". .,';:,.:',:i's ..''••''''..','",:/t; r.•:. .1.',...1-1 -7:.:::::!..g:1:::••:;.'1 ..::::•'::"..i::!':: .:".!:-.1i• - ''.• ...''' 2/7/pth • / /......./,',:,.. . •.. • .././//////,77-",,:•.:,?;.;•::•'.i:',',.::'::-.3•:1*..t.:::....,,.:::........................................ w'...:; •••"'''...•',.•.;:':.... .•':'.':'.•T',A.,'....•.:.',.'•,:;,•:','k`....''. :%.. { /Alf/P/1111j e'/ ./. .11'..':.:.%•:.</..t1A.,.. ;',' ,/?•::.:;6'?::i.:.::./...?! :::!....x....,............1.••••••:••: ::•:::•:!•.;:;•4,:t...:?..;1;•••?:':r''::::::''•••:':::-.;:.........1::,:'......• • / t............... ....:::•::$1:.;:S '':>:...li•••.X:•;.•;'.:: ) 147/$1! / Z..; .' -':'•',4„.e...5 ...;:l.rfge....•:::::.:...1.....t'iga..;;;;::T::::.:',:,•:;...1. !"Thl...::'::::i).•1:'...':.:•••••'...';•••1••••.;:': ••.•,:.''' I i',4ili://,,ri;i i (./ /'a' '' • /...C.S. •'',C...."''......",•:!•:'...'i'''."...:*).A....;:••.*:!::ii!,:ii.1,1.V....i.V:::'....•. ••-.....f•••,...,'..,1'..........2:..;..:..'• .f..;;-, •>....a .'i /5 I \ 1..•:' , ..1:.”2"(''.4. .../,./.,.. 'c7//:'.',:.•ei:.:1:-.,';:i,:''::::'.;:i?....V.:''.".1''..'::A.?:!;i"!!'.1".. L';:0?...Y*....."„::':.:.,.:••. ::.:...:"•:.•:' .' •'::.::::'1.: Pi(/'//67j,:i .6..:. .i„.: //'7'1,2,•,//:":/:::•;>,i/:::;,:::/.:.••••:•1•X:';"'-•:1:":••:::i;':"::!}...''":...f.V!.'!: ...:•:.:•.";,."::::".•":;.":":;•:::::.•,•••• •••••-,::••:•;•::::...".:-::•••:::::..liftt!lk,. / /4/7 //4;',,,) ;',4,. .i ;./041t49'.,... 41.]:1,::„...:,i.',..i:i.•i:•:::......:::: :::.-::;.:'-..:.• 'i:..0 :.....i'..i'''......•:.'...::::...:::: :: '•:',.::.• (,.'. N.--'' , ','Y'.%I'!:•, . kr il(l‘(Sli.t.. ....., l''':..............1:f:...::;;;"';..?..'..,:•:' ....'.',,(..,<:::........':.V.:: :::'!::'::....>;');'::'::;'.;' ;...i.::..:....:0.,.'1' .`:; ;s...',:.::::'.:'.:"...:s:3.:.....'1:. :7.;..;::: ''.f:'..:‘''.1''''''8'.:"...;%::1::.'''....f.1:'.:.::1:::::::.:::;::::l:::.::...:..;.;:.::.;;;;;;;1....,:1:&':..:::::::.:A ..::.„::.::.....;.:*1:t‘.4i.::.. ! ii i I 1 1 1 ",7'. .* . ...''-::: IVAt,,,VAi:::•-...k i 1,i;.::::.::::4:;i1.:.:..':;.;''......;',:i.; ...:, .t::: .L,.::::..'..!::::::D::.,:-.:'.:',:>::.....::::1.:.!,!)::.....:.":i,:c.i.. ; 4:,.......4,;:. ....,4* II Iiiril ../,:/.....• . ..:..: • / n.:4:-::,.......:.. .,\ ;1.:. ;.1::.;::,1,.:..:.:::.::5::::1;1('''.:.*: ............::;Q:-.4iP:h.i.c':':i7::':!:::::::;:;:','::'':'.......:::•'.'..;: ';'.'1:7,...-...,.:.'••' '.;•,z....!;•c:!..,•;•;'.,••;-1,,:•::!:. ..,••,:::...‘".:'..AL•••',.....•:..:.n.i.::, •':.:..:.:•Y!.::i•:-::::::.;',•:••••::.::•:•e'.%:....',.: ..•..,. the/i[lit 1,1' ' ....... ...•: ‘‘..‘z :‘,."S'..:',"\'1,\I r.:.:••:.:.:.7.:1:::::-''''''''' ' ....'..."•'fii.:::.•••*•::.:..,.....•.....:••:..,.:•••:, . ... ,... , II 1:1/747//4•-•••: •••'...r..: /•---"•--\""'Z.'s',,,,•,, ,,,,;,,,..t,,';.:::•••:..:••::•,.:••;::::;:,;••,.:i•J.•:::.":. •....,;•:•..; :,:., ..,.•/.::,....•::.:.:..:.i.„:.,:..::•... ...."••-: 1 , • .• / . . .. # .. .. •-" :.. II"If i'•((/7,1/'IP..-•;::: • //I *---.. ..NVON•'....!!....1.••:;:i!,...!;*"! .:.•i!.•... • .:::::.:..:...:•••:•::•.•:••.••;;3;•:. • ...•,. . • 1 I i'll i c•/'s'.• •...' /' i' ''''''•:.' '' 'sk.t.....i.c:.:Vi':.,:•::.i• .i...;:::!..f.;•.-.;••.,?':..';!.'t....4 4.#:.•...",.;•........:,".:.,.•:•.•••-.0,:7•,':••:•-:'....-•-• ' .'••..! •:::..:. q.. ;," 4,:i.. ..i....l' .'• :...,...:. ifif# / .) /-*`` .,i:.:':(.'... ‘4\,, ,'''1.......'i''.........:.;.i:i' ... ... ....•...••• •• .••••• ..... ••.....••• ••••..........., ...••• ...•••••.: •• •••.•. • .•,• 71ifily:••••.•:. ..:::: ti 1, y . ... 1 .__27, /,//h)))i 1\V....'.1;:-..0:.:•:•::: ( , ;111/filiP''.....:.. ./: i' •-.2).../'/-'. 11''../ 11\ 1)'13\lit:::i.:;..:. ...t,i:.. . i. •••:;..:.•:.!'!!•:••• .::.•:•..... :.....,•1 ' ••• ..:•••:.:;:'..;.:....!!....,...;::::.... ..:'........:.:..:.:1• 11$'..,P.;.;i.: (./. :: .c i , ;4.zi I Whirl : .. :: .•;:•,::.:::•;k.•:;:::•,::........:•,..::* •-•::••.1.'ls.:: "lk il''"( 'S. s. 1 C''"//''''')" j j I'‘.l' .•-•-•.1...; ::?O'''.:.:j:::.......••':::.•••••:.....'. :!:: ‘...:•I ...‘: \ ';'4'..-.;':T.:.:•'‘.1 '..' .',...:'....f..'..: ,...*:*•••,•••• •' - • •• ' .:•'-',./ re..,....'./•••• . •:..••'"'..:••' /' 'I;1,1,1'..:!>•::.. .:• 1( .f-`•;•: ''' ''..'..:..,/ -41''::'....*::-"::: . .. .. ...., .. .....r... „:••:.0:•:::::::::::.::..:::.!.,:•,;....::......:•,...... . :::--Iv•:.- I'i.'•.:? ' P ii/)1 /'f•-'•'1":'•,::1 .-7,":4•-e,\,.'s,'/..::::::.1?/'r i•:••:i.'41%....:. If(' ,,••• ,1\i/i le,-,..y;.y;,- .,.:`if:7%.,:..;...t...• ::.:::::.!•.::.,...::,::„.),...,..,.....):: , •...;:.:.•1 ...•:• . .....,....,....,..i::,;::, .:..i,.....:.,,i.;,..:,;:::::::;:z.f.. ..::,. .-•.,: .‘ • ••••...........,... :,..:,...... /if", ,,... .,..._,;,..,:„A..,,,,•,....;,,l,.;::::.:,i:i.....,:i••.::::::,:.:(.;.::-k..•,:..••1::". ...,..:......(..:,...........:;,....:..,...:•C.,...•,.,••"::-..-1.•:-r, ,•-:,:..,:„,.:::1.z:-....,„'-.N. .:..:'.',..:/"...,,,4 /:.••...:•:• .:•• i,,.. , .,...i..,•A ,;, ,./ ( .,•"../,›---r.7,. ..s;-Y;<::...:...,........,.t:.......:.....1.....7':...:,•:•„•:.:,1,1 ..',...:::.".. .:-.:...r••.•:•...:':•.:'•" •....:•:.:..'' /. r,,,.::...,,..........:.,::,:.4z.q.:V?.:v ,• "-:.:::i...,::. ,,4..:•:....:,:,;„,....•.• i....'..•• '.•? 'I i r/ / .....•' ' /',..:.,'. :-,.,....,1,:••.•:.•'i:•:::.::,•,: ,•:.•::i..:-.....• 11.'1'. ..:,04/..N:::::::',....•••;..• ' .••:':...:!:'::':[ ...;...:...:!..:'.i.::: ' ::.t '.."°..7.. ... .::.:::5:::''''' • :'''11,1 1111----/ /z''///iii k f. •:•,::.•:::..::!::....'.:::„..*;.4;;:.;?.. ..::-.f•••..,:;:t::e• ::::/,•!! 1(\ /. ' ,./ i i 14.:,•:•":.;f:::-.;..'........ '••!6:!:.e:::;.'1::,,.....'::'•.....1.:-.'.: / //r--<-4/.11/..:•: ::::: :i.: ...:.•:. 77.: '.;• ii:)',*!:..; :illZ.:::..7." ... ... ,:::•::::.; :'.'...:.:'::.‘,.:::...(:,4:: :;:g:•::::•.::-„::. V ':•••;•.i:1'i)///,'/V;;_":1::. ;.-;',':;:-?-t::i.:;i::;.:j.,i..:ii!:: :1:.:5.::...!:.:!1 ,..5 .".'>.', ..•?4t.. .., ::::::;.:: ...:, ...........::•• ,.......• . .. ....x: ....,:.,..............;......:•..........,......,:...::::.::......4...... . ".1....;;;.:..../.,.: ::';1'...;.,,,.',... ..i.,........:.......,.i.li.,........-y..,.s2,..:......Z..;,..::....,.....::':' $':;3:1!lit fllfF"7"--- I 1.. :'..../.:•• •.. ' '':::.•,i...:!i:.:: :.....::::.....';' '.%'.*,';'.....:':. ..::::.:.:: ." .!'.4, * ... 1,..'''.:':.;:..*::;.::'''::'... .i..1:':::'''.....'''...:i.:•:•••::''.:::':':.:.:.... '..........,...;,. ..,...,....:4;'.;.;,::; . /,;%.,..Y....:::::;,1....,,,/,,,,,:::,:;.:...v.......:. !.:........:.<,?....•.......:.:.:,,,...;.i.i.i.........,:#::;:::::....::...'.',.:.'a;,'...','...,,,,,.-;:t;:'...2..,'.:":\.-.4.,,.........,::::....::....7".tt.„' -;..." ' :• • .....„,.,...• •,.::..;'.•...:,•:::•:1:.:;:'„..::•>1......i'.1....:5;t':',..!:..Cti,/ , 4:::;:'Z'C?,.;-:::.g.:'. it'''.:::•';.,!'i P.if I I j i / .......,/.1.:....::.:.?.:::.:.......,,,,..:.n.f.i..:',•:;y,-.....,:;;;:„..,„.!:',f'......::::::..::::,..;'.../:...!...!....:::!....'i,1•:•:..,...:;•.:: 4::::;•.•:zi::••:•••:.X.:•,,,.:..,•:: ...'N*,:c•:•:•''''''"•14'•"'" :::,••'•.'•?:•::::•.I.••:••:•;;:'77-' ' ,..:•,ri.:i..'•••,A,4<t......::::•::::••'.:" :1.4:.:',.!'::.....'...:,:.. I)) i.11 i ,.i.:4!•••::i•:i..;.......„••..::::::in::•:::•;::;iii::•::,:,;:',•••••••,:'••••:;;,.!:,..„.:.:,........„',. .,...,4.:•i.:::.,04,:•.•,6b...'!'•:•'''?:'.F;:.:' ,;."'.'....:.:..::,:„..;..-•... - "..-;.':: . . ..., ;:.::i:::•••.4 ,:.....7.'.,.:::;:....„*.••••' , ,1. ••:••1:.:::•...: /,,,/sil!I. ; 4 ..:.::•'.....5.:1:•::i'..:*••;:'3:.h...',:.••••••.:(':::•..'..::...••••:;;;•••P '..•••;'!..: •;:i":,;:':**:i..:.i.S..;:g•?i;..J::'•••-•:;:'.:::::•'f.1...\••••••::::.i!.•••..: ••••:....40...'.;..1;:.:Y:li:::.• :.•:"":'`.:.., .•••i:. ..•••• ar•-,••....:..:.....,....:f.:.:..'•,..",....'.-...'.- 4 /' i il i! / e•::•..:.:...,....•.,..."......', ...:....:;.•:....:.,.::•:.::::...:.•:.....': .: ....: :;,':•.::::'..:: ::•!.i.• ..•....:•7'7.:"7:77.'::.3/4:•••,,:.:.' :K, ,.,.•:•::,•::::.....:,:i......•:-.:,;•..:.,..::.::.i%.,:,./ ...,3::„.:.,.,‘..:!..,..::.:::!:;:.::::p.... 11 f 1 i I i..J::::::•,.!.::::.:..•...::..:,.!.;< .:.:..•:"..:.,..:-..'•.....:.•:P.':•::1!1 A!..:::::i:: .':::::.!:.:.'•:•..S4.!. :::..:::.:...4.::...:...:..•.:•.:!..••••..•••'..•.•..;!.....••...;•••:•::::.•:•:".:.":..:..,.• :.:•,,•.' -.• ••:• '., ..•.............;.....,,...:::.::....,:,..,..A,f e. .1.i.:.•:.,•;•F.,A.:,...\,.•:.,,,,..• ••••• • ••••..••••••••••:• •- • •- .. • -......••••." II(II / / :::: :•V•':,. .....i,''.:•••‘•.':...'••i A.:•,:•1.....:!•:•:•.;;,:;'.:•-::•••:.. .... „:.„.,:... .;. ........:..„..,,;,.:„.4,,;;:,,:.z....;:: :::•.......;:„ .:..: ..::•......... . •...<•:•,.. vz-4..-e,-1•:,.:.,.,-.7.•,<•.:.!' . . . • 1 1 / 4.... ..";':. .V ''..•••••c••••• .:::..:\,......'PF"'.i::••?s '......:••••••':."•'':•:' ..)•••- __,•,. • . ,,., ....3:,,,*,,."..,:iAi••• ,..ia:.::...:•.;:ik:::1:'. ' hi / / ''''..'......'::•......7...,;.;:.'':•i).:1:t..:.'•;:::::.:: :.l.:,.;.*.i'.• ...--:....--•••-•.....--/.4.,j -•e•1 '$•-- ..,. •-••••-,-•.," .. 'PO,.,•,-.:::'..•:-..':•.:'.., •":4.:;,..•....:...' .,! A•/ 1 l';:•'::::::'........:]:.!:•!.'.:1!!!: :::.,,Ii.4:.: 417; ',•Y.,.....'•.''•••:';''..:•.:. :',.,,'',!..'. .:;,....,.!;.`,....'...,.'",, ::.?::•.;:,'•;,:•,..!,:,..:;,,...2: --,, .-. ... : . lr C ••• ;;;;;•••...ii:.'lit.'''7',•*::.... ..'...'',•••i''•':•-•',.. ' ".•,.., i ,e4.;:.:0:::.?•••••.p..i::.,:,...z.' • ,hj • "-.....• • • ' 1 i ; 1 i i.•.?.?!...M:-.;'•".'•::•:•"" .'i*";. .....,!•,..:N .''''"''''''"''......."'".'- ' ;••• ••"•:••• '''' .'"• ...."...... .......;..;•":" ..„W.,,,t,„.., L. i,...*:.:.1.4.....;•,,,:thi4...i.:4.4„.:...1 .',:••;•.;::::•::;:... ' ..'''.••••••'•,•`..:::....i. ,•,'11. •• . . . . "i!,• •,0,. ••••••:;- •*„.,.,.. *•.'?;....,..•,,:..,•,„... /.., : 1‘\,\\,\,, ..----,--\ •••••••....._.....„. ,/,'„,,i•vii!i'::!.. •., " ii.-:-:;* ,;,:'.;•:••:'!,.....:56i • .... .. ....i,:... •,.. .. ,.: •'.'..'.• •'''.:?........?‘ N .. ••• • v • .....1..•'..'..?'..i. .:: •1:.......' ...:•••••;.i':'.!;••:•.!:>‘.• ,...,;,„?.•'.::( . ''....•Q,...,'• :/.':' . , ..... ..........,••••••••••••• ••i.,..•.. ,,.:„... .....:„.., ,.. III.i..::..!:::..:.51;•:•••:.$ ::••.'..•:::!ii.:*;.:5:::::I.::„..':.f.:.:.;.:•..!..::::•:il '-':)./...?..;''.:•••i':. .'h i:'.....,•:....;411,`;..P::. :::1::!:.. :'; i':°7':i§i!j ....?:./i..','.'..',•',....^...".';....• .., •'.','•:,',..'... :!:;••••'i::.../•::::.4..• .lni.•••..g.:......:;ii::..1.:•:'in?'•:' ....../...,X;...:''.;' .'.:.::",‘,',' '':•':::;.'“...'.•;.••:',2: '.!,...:f.:".•.:::"."*.l.'';';i.'" ...:1„ ';:',•••,:::'.F.,.!.;.',•'',•:',44'.!::;I:i:•••:::::.:-.4tA,i,.iiii. ............ ....,:....:.:::1...•,., s .. ....,.. .. '.''':i'•••,'..'-••:::•;2:4:.:.';/.,.."..4;:;..0..91..://••:::29: ":7:':1f. "' .••C/).•i! •:::;;:lf.:''::.?'::;•.k.:•:••:. 4..V,;:...:...• ':''::•:;:.'r:f::.::•::::::'.•11.: .3':•'•'••:%:. ';'.....!...i.;*, '.49.V•••. I ....' .... .. . '..‘...':Z...':. •• ....•., •• • , .:•:.:;•.'....,•••••'••,•!....';jj.r.••'•.i4;.!•Pri:•::'::: . . :.V. '•"::::,:::“...,.;...47'..'7...1••,/ :',.:.......,.:;.:•';..:::'..:..'; ,:•:•::::7.•••:::::.:':' . .:.':...:‘.:: 1. .,......:.!.: .....1•'....-............................ 1 I ••:.'!'.%.*:.:q•i:' ..:::;............... ..i.....;:l.ti, i;.:.;:6...:;.:Ai....:::::.(?... .. ... •,. . •• . ,. . . . :. ../....i.:X.'::.L::.::.:....:.. ''... • ',.........1.:!; :i...:1 ... •• • .`' 'A".:J•Sif....:.:.....e.•••••....::A.• - • . . , ' i • oj.7 it%I 1 ; r. y:.%%i l i ,//` // J' f II il I `(I CO 0 /(jam 1 r//�/1 r /i / / ! i/!-, 'i. I... � `r. I!: O /((' .;. „ q r / /4:t•+a 1 III 1 I .! 470 •_. -. j %//r qr r:./r I. I i.G7y:. / I r /r/ ,, F 1,,4r4. ��a J ; ; , I c o % t i i ,� SStJS'tir'[1'`j(i;j�, 1 ! r r 1t` -; ( 0 N/ • f , `A r/,//,/'/ 1j, '/ / // /'' tf,: I l' Ili I I_ � i , 1./ii/ -' I:'if1jJ / ! ' ' • 1';'.' e. Oi !:9• f//0/' ri/',411/4!/,//r//i 1 r7 y..:. ,a,..., .. •.. 1 I I cD / I / 1/ i r�:I��I/1/1/1 /I;/.%!/ ;r',/,r �r. i i O / //` 1,,,../,.,Ail , ,/„/, ;///„/,11/,, /�j///, 1 / L j . .'. :-� j Ihi I '% a.4/ 4SJ r i , L f'�i/ii�i r!/!!i////r rl ! I // / /, Q o% % /`/ /,'4c /// %'%%1 f'li`jfllltt/(,(f(//j/ / ,•1:. .• ^• • 1.` 1,4ffl1 • • ! /j J'f'7j t l%/ / d 1/ I � la ) / • 0 / /', /',//!/ //'! / '1.%! // /�i 1 f!!/(,.i;iv 1 •,,( f b -•{" ''I f I I: '�� / //, // . r , r r//t/%i'Pi//////11` 1(f1! l ! J i III i 7 ` Sal I _ / /• "j j /i�'//1, ,,/„2//,•,i /,ter!/%/, /i �,r fI , • iiiiI•�, X O // //,/////,j..2/ ,1✓/////fly %r /'/;,!i %/F �J/ 1 r -- .- .. /:I .,,1 IT ` 0_ / 4 I . ' ( it i y , , -,,,,,, ,v,,,,,, , ./..,(..(.2,./ , / ..,),I,iiii, , - .... " .-...,....7:,?' . f' ll / f g . 1 \ 1 ,1 .,/3 ///),"/,r,,,.. ,722.2./„/..../"..../ .041.\••\ - • ••:,40#, ....". ‘,:-... in-,.., / /j/ 1 i !'r%r.Kg., ,.11 r"•1,/,,,7 ;!'/?,/,( ;;;// /i// ri.. / } 11 rl i• / /:;' /-/,flll� //`!i//l/ l; t!, r j/r/( ,//1/ lM: / / f' :1: 1� +: / / ,i'i!+ A,////,! ,,,,/!/'l1 j,lf /!Jrj/ •(. !/ / ,1 t .1 1 JJI / • // ,<9'�r//�,/'/� Al rly,l'/�/117.7I/Ir�f l rf I I �A' \!�iA4sl .r,'`i2/ / /-••••! r�• t I•/ i/ /4 tn,,4 I?� it / /1 ,% ,1 1 7 1 1, ;-•—.-•.--<'i l a \� �� � ' I�I i !'1l1� ;, •„•/ • /1/,' •,/',,,, /i•f"•, ,�� •I °'-- :" ` III • / /,./i z .,/ i.1 \. ., ,,,,Ci.p'(;//./j////// • 11, ///1.• ...1<,- /I / ifir//7. .,--`/7.1). 1, / ////////iy/12/,.///141,7-ti-/ ' .-'<'1 / ‘t• • \\%\ j / i ///,/,„"f-,.) 1 1 „.%//1/7,/, "./.:*.:.. ..t.41/..//:-...% • / / r, / r '//` :i'/./ to l 1 ll 1 Ivy,.,). r./,; I//�I/ -1 ,�, � I/,r/ '1 i %`f I D a i 1 1 i 1. / 1r / / /i!`:'/li, !1,//,: dt 11.} } 1 i/I r �, vl jet fi I! /11!f\.,..�.,J ► 1 /1 /, •1t��1 /,//�/1JPP` 1,,,\ `\ ' \ \ / 1 / ///.,` ! i` //,!/, I, i f i/ J iv' 1 i i / I //'///! , /y t/r I!!1 fr///i,!t,. .cf1 j ` S \\,\ ,4,/:////y. ///ill .3;1,4 \ 1.1411 i I \''\`\ \ \ \''\ / 1‘..--itiiii,//////////////// i 4/// LP/ itrif ' maw* • ---- i /„,/%/.o• / f/ /tJr.„,, ,! ,/r1/:/ . r•It• .'::,/ I \,.,,-_.. �/�,��i \ \ \ \\ • ,/1/ I0 4.-A".mK J //�'//i//%ram SIL.S 7- :�� /J% /I/�//1/ 1: 1 �.. �/ ` *. , c; 1.„``\`\\ �`,\ , //01,://'i „,,,3 .4,./ 4/7,, ,.4,--............„,„:„ , ',-. - ;::•..7., .),--,..:---v .,. • • - , '1"' " - if/074 t"****•//-77" ...// ',•(/.':',/1//-e.,:..r..„'". -..,,....- --. ,.. % .. :••••„.;....7.::, , 1 ,l'qji,!'L( �./ r1,?�"!/,4,t,nf'/z.' 5° r: , .r; .,, (?( / \`, I! I r/ " \if\v `\ '�. J j!r fj f!n / Ii(irti`{, �01 l-. ,1 L..� •i. �'., e;.'ti`: �( o f \\�% \\,..,: \\\,.\\1 \ . : ... I (r'7}ill.//// %/% �,1` %2,-• •�1F1'. \, m..., I \�. R\ Nam/ \\ ♦ , \' k\ \ \\ \\ s. ,1,0„0, . .. ..,... ,... .. •. .• •. olu.- ,. \ : \. ,.. iiii#V,;) 4 ,..." Ailr.\;v\e 1 cn _, 1 lit?Ifl// Y'' ��,,� ��.dv 1,sos\`\\ jt N r1f III IIIIIyI // \ ` r F i' i/ r )ii I !'/;/ ! ,i I ' /�!I\ , 11 aZm i \w •� illllll FU \ \.: 1 ! r�� /n ..i• •: / t Mill ,I�IIIII�I / ">....:•\ Z a•.9 / f 1,p� //,, 1",—,), ': 9 1 i ��iilill O Q O I II�� 1 / , d : \ V\ ( ! irfrri / r t�i v,• :`F'`�:i` • I l r l) �D u h 11 / ` ..- - •-\ \sr- /fie i I rrii� /VP l • J ° ly ;�•�/ -,,i/rI jI 1 n n / • / G,,,,,t F_i',,,/,- ,i'i l\ \ �( J ' !is/ 5 sr IA1c!(jr'7 � /_J't",,,5/i/ 41g1/ y /i!�'7. , '11 , t / t Ilp ill 'fl �' ' /` /,./1_ ,E ! :�}11 jt�-, ,//.,,.,`c, .J //ii;W'Ipp pnp // .�1,`i/� s i/' ',t / r:%'','-�\;'j / ''. ,,,, 4n•i06 p p ! i24•;/ i sf 1 ! ; �•/'r / of/ r�~• /� III� 2' dd llll,d1 •„'I,:.p t / / N' �i\ii!/7.7. 1 r i 1 .., i't ♦ / //;i/•/,.' .,,,...,. -..:' </ 1 l IIIIIIII / i' Id :;.41j1 �Lii ..._.... / Ji !! ,/i i/i! 1' t1 'if ♦ i /f 'I �a ` d�il��ili // d`d hII // / ,�/ /Vlf % /ii ! i }( ^,ill,— ♦ /-- : 0 °•••,I ltl•0,11101 // // 114pIUIIN / .'�f/ /iiy /-��iif,,/f!i jlf \ r E ,/ •'\ ��III / Iglllll / / /�' ,/ - i i/ / uol f /i I I 1. !111 •. .,1, .. I __ �/ %1.1 i i!1 / /!II :" ;" ' - K1 X.` / q. . /X i. ,. I t ca } v :\ ///SO' / / W Lii I1 li / �� / z X/!j/./ cn-I 1I . 0m Z t o II ''�� ./ Ito�1 v / in /�.t` f P W W N I Hiam 1 i I \•nra�'' .i, j .i xaunm i ,/;:::),••'.',2 .../y i •I;I•. ... :, „. . , ,,,,, :. ....zr. . - ' 0 , 0 //// ✓'-� . ,„ , . . . . _ ..,.. .v,+f'� .. . ry s .•• ,i'uc ,1 *Y�e,. .� �pn+;; .> ..ri}5!SN'w.s?�+i+SSW"7'•C, ,S,4�n.i4' / ., a eoF. _ _.., I " 'KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TABLE 3.5.2B SCS WESTERN WASHINGTON RUNOFF CURVE NUMBERS SCS WESTERN WASHINGTON RUNOFF CURVE NUMBERS (Published by SCS in 1982) Runoff curve numbers for selected agricultural, suburban and urban land use for Type 1A rainfall distribution, 24-hour storm duration. CURVE NUMBERS BY HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP LAND USE DESCRIPTION A B C 'D Cultivated land(1): winter condition 86 91 94 95 Mountain open areas: low growing brush and grasslands 74 82 89 92 Meadow or pasture: 65 78 85 89 Wood or forest land: undisturbed or older second growth 42 64 76 81 Wood or forest land: young second growth or brush 55 72 81 86 Orchard: with cover crop 81 88 92 94 Open spaces, lawns, parks, golf courses, cemeteries, landscaping. good condition: grass cover on 75% or more of the area 68 80 86 90 fair condition: grass cover on 50% to 75% of the area 77 85 90 92 Gravel roads and parking lots 76 85 89 91 Dirt roads and parking lots 72 82 87 89 Impervious surfaces, pavement, roofs, etc. 98 98 98 98 Open water bodies: lakes, wetlands, ponds, etc. 100 100 100 100 Single Family Residential (2) Dwelling Unit/Gross Acre % Impervious (3) 1.0 DU/GA 15 Separate curve number 1.5 DU/GA 20 shall be selected 2.0 DU/GA 25 for pervious and 2.5 DU/GA 30 impervious portion 3.0 DU/GA 34 of the site or basin 3.5 DU/GA 38 4.0 DU/GA 42 4.5 DU/GA 46 - - 5.0 DU/GA 48 5.5 DU/GA 50 6.0 DU/GA 52 6.5 DU/GA 54 7.0 DU/GA 56 Planned unit developments, % impervious condominiums, apartments, must be computed commercial business and industrial areas. (1) For a more detailed description of agricultural land use curve numbers refer to National Engineering Handbook, Section 4, Hydrology, Chapter 9, August 1972. (2) Assumes roof and driveway runoff is directed into street/storm system. (3) The remaining pervious areas (lawn) are considered to be in good condition for these curve numbers. 3.5.2-3 11/92 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL (2) CN values can be area weighted when they apply to pervious areas of similar CN's (within 20 CN points). However, high CN areas should not be combined with low CN areas (unless the • low CN areas are less than 15% of the subbasin). In this case, separate hydrographs should be generated and summed to form one hydrograph. FIGURE 3.5.2A HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP OF THE SOILS IN KING COUNTY HYDROLOGIC HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP GROUP* SOIL GROUP GROUP* Alderwood C Orcas Peat D Arents, Alderwood Material C Oridia D Arents, Everett Material B Oval! C Beausite C Pilchuck C Bellingham D Puget, D Briscot D Puyallup B Buckley D Ragnar B Coastal Beaches Variable Renton D Earlmont Silt Loam D Riverwash Variable Edgewick C Salal C Everett A/B 'Sammamish D Indianola A Seattle D Kitsap C Shacar D Klaus C Si Silt C Mixed Alluvial Land Variable Snohomish D Neilton A Sultan C Newberg B Tukwila D Nooksack C Urban Variable Normal Sandy Loam D Woodinville D HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP CLASSIFICATIONS A. (Low runoff potential). Soils having high infiltration rates, even when thoroughly wetted, and consisting chiefly of deep, well-to-excessively drained sands or gravels. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. B. (Moderately low runoff potential). Soils having moderate infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted, and consisting chiefly of moderately fine to moderately coarse textures. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. C. (Moderately high runoff potential). Soils having slow infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted, and consisting chiefly of soils with a layer that impedes downward movement of water, or soils with moderately fine to fine textures. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. D. (High runoff potential). Soils having very slow infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted and consisting chiefly of clay soils with a high swelling potential, soils with a permanent high water table, soils with a hardpan or clay layer at or near the surface, and shallow soils over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. * From SCS,TR-55, Second Edition,June 1986, Exhibit A-1. Revisions made from SCS. Soil Interpretation Record, Form #5, September 1988. " • 3.S.Z-2 11/92 y • KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL FIGURE 3.5.1C 2-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS V\ -.-,--mi ir.. . -fflik-mvps.0, art, -,‘ _,,s111,91,10AtA 'War vow. Mi x ' , ii .- ,,,,,,AF,A, 4,,,,....iit,,,,„ T/744,-k„.... 1 64-(p . .. 10 '14.02.17g1406. k- nilfr:AlittP111111 Al IN , . • .. ,. I(\-..\i i1,----7-•-eln a14gAd4,.--„-Ps,,-i-s kk-s4•-,....•1'1''i.' �,t,;iti...tA.i;.,,l0ik fieiw.l'a'-il41.6n t-t V 2 �`�\11 ,.. 7 Ik,111f.M4,,►Ai�i b,/Aq&vf tieii. i 4Tio07y41r,#_.,i4. •'4 /2.' 0w4s 1lml.lk,i-0,-4--0-Ip\;,I*!p1 • ,'nw ' iFs= � -.1.i-d,9_..1i 1,,f1 iif/i--epAilk1Lr1l:.2 / N IEi ', 11 4i 4Si/r, rje t_ir=am ,.4 kl..-- ' - glipt, ., • , 1100 •vir•-ilray;;..., ("t_ 1y r rig. i � ,�1 � ../ E� 1 � 1 �y�R� � �,e,,, _ / � f ....,. . .., -, , . , . ' , _Es ic.:k\, .. ., j,,,v,, ,, 01, isoNr. ..1 - '‘.: Wit , ../.=,1 ii • - .1111eirt7,4.63106b3kN&b. itt. Ii i. ,,,r u.. pi ,...•::.• .1tAt..•i•••o. aawi tk .- -*.s-u- k N I �. - ;III1e ,, vi -.A iw-tm•N-•'v- o-�► ` ...,:__„ 'I +��j ice' -T ���F^ _ ��� ,'• � 4, T ..-,.J ` i _ \ .�grit _ -0,„ vasitimipmem xio. \\Vim ( f ':-.. 74.4rift'bk. ‘ liftrolgr • golirivortgoli. , ,,,,, i _ i - , 141IN ''Nmstv, ''' ' w ,ro _ t 1 .- ,,,i0 ::1 .10.1 „it" . • , ,:_.. • iokriii„,,, . 01.4gioni,. , ,,,, iii „ , . - ....- ---- . . \'‘..t, J-- ----\ 4 kAr APAILI AMPALI4114.4* h,•twil. 4 . (Iv art /- • \, -- of 0►■ •� -, ev. WTI figit,-- ,11/K,11. ,..4- , ___ ., . AA lit r Rtionr -,- ` .*,,,Pir" '4144.1114i •f . - :- . •• k ' 17/7,_')iiii .r-, • , 4 (V V V*11II ''4 ' 1Ag.. . _ .i. _.:.! -. . .____:._ ___, . Nylmr. iiiiiit fir, ',11 2-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION 4. 'ial` Rr `1 3.4 6' ISOPLUVIALS OF 2-YEAR 24-HOUR ' ` V INASPA!''� _ ,f 35 TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES ry �- ,�pr r 1 . M••ram ,� 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Mlles •, ry ni ©. elf 1:300,000 3.5.1-8 _ 1/90 " .• KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON. SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL FIGURE 3.5.1E 10-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS y A 'itilliiriVitt6 4 Will L ' I . :1-. ---. 22 A Vkttiatieht,10 ..4 ' iiixf*-ft * A . 23 : 25 itiiisyrfilif IAA , 24 i • 12.kiN r _. L \II , En a lrAlm 4 i/ juipavA OrAlrall t,-. , ' ..:\ 2. A WI, iN__,,Y , `wi1 iiii =� Oro --X.mi MMIPP p at �� ��� sky, ;:1; _� . I grA �- , i„, T. lo - P.:1111-ilitil- otiiililit..__%AkIx--4....,'Ir ,',„er (0 ca-- a° \ , ,.. 29 \i a04414.120.0 ri,s....ftiitio, . .,.. .\�►fir' I r� ,,,6- -it..41 , rivalstimtumwf5 ...: .. .A, A h 31 k -..•- ,IiL lak ' llit -' goL,aw- 4-*Stitrillihvek;:v .. . 41.'% ''' Ili 3 % it ' ' It/ 11* 14.140Se111116. "nrf .*/**;'Iik yf Ill A\1111 A ' \ filW A 1 MIA\ I,� --' - w to \ 1 opok - ip,tvw, 33 14 , - lib %.),,,,,,\ 1 F‘,‘e• fr il.4. - i.1 - : ...8, -;f7_k, t , , %.,,i,„._ : t ttlitilfplosiiik--i% i _ v� i111ER ;l `wit k, - -a-"I AA*" i 111111ik - al witallit.--7 II-3\ i 'Nk, , Air ) lir:, „,. ia..,,,o. amp. Ikkt ma ) • .... „ r-irt to,,,,,It........r. ..,,, ,.. . , _ 7 qrailii \""%111511 --m° 1 5 a rill",- i= APR lipin . iptelarrisig ; fir i - - r, v --s____J- • �� fil1r i , ;Mb 7 , ,164,i .1 41 4 ,‘, \ .= _i - _ , oalglitin e 'ir � Wrirti. agaPPWO f•por, - L •( ys o p! ,r,ziim , . , .31 i is: Vri ii 1 1,41firefin b o 10-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION , :► , .4 ISOPLUVIALS OF 10-YEAR 24-HOUR q'q 4,� r rllr` - �e�.+�5 � TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES 3O W I '3' n ‘11114P," --' '.4 O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Miles tb - ��" 1:300,000 3.5.1-10 33h 1,0 - 4.0 1 9 . KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL FIGURE 3.5.1H 100-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS I 1 4A------:.,-..a......;vf:x ,Af.t, - 1-ki- :--vra - )..'-'-----'z---------- --- N.---- . ---,,-- \\ oivar4r7 'TL1(147411141711b 4 -''''''k'. . IP P i:' Ihalliktifirtit si(.. .,I 3 3 . � `• ►� Jai. ��► gt1 I/ ; 'Nveivratimmer % ,4"1111"*10111 1-1,, i' .67*Viitair. Iiillira*W11110/ L't y ,obviriltro-orem .inskr,zA .,..„ Al,, or : i i ... 43 ) , Ak,:44,\zi Vivw- ,;4i *AIL,. . Si: ii.114. IP i ,. 1 '' '-- 7Itiii Ail m.futliiiiIIMP‘Plr k Ida ---N`rVe 0 -144 -.''' - '''''''' Vii"' - - iiji.rimior-4"--74--iiie 174 / (0°,‹ ,, 1 4. .........s . ;., , .._.,,,„„„4„,.....,=, . , il , .,„ s -! • 4. eo , atR11*".gaZIERMAINI vii I V, I .f . �'f 1 t .,,: . • I ili . , f y-e am`'! ' r• .7,,,....,,—.,,,. ..,...411,.., '� 0 \1111111404-4 AI (00 .-vt . ktli ,,04041 .51:.AA : /iiktatt fil 4IF 01111tk ‘‘' - ..‘6,A." - 46 ii,.- .., 10114, 3\ \ wr rIrma -;ire. `!!�� • •'�.. -- Nh, ��it .!. . �� iil/�l` isl � �'jpl �iii. Als:.2),:;:, . .4i ! r ARP ./ Ari P LI '. .41t-ssir 0 4i y‘ ‘ operoit_. vo,__- _„44 Ink. fiat. . 1 .111 . QL.t. .i.... .,, . ,., i . 1 -mat -.., , i 1, . innyiaiI, , 4..,,tx dr i rat . ec_i. pain vi \\*.v .4 — _. / 1, iik iglairtaell:SI iti -rm.' t--,011a! ( 1 tili'7-)lit PI cfrillEgialil -Atli f II* .4 . . is ..z MI • WrAI tr,L)cdt i AlWiee ; ./ - i / .NME.:77,:_ . L \.) IFF1-4 Wiliii4' 1111411111.rde5 isaill romuull‘ li, ,sugmeirr-g _ _•.;- ,.... iiiigion 1Pou • , di 4t*.- ) *7,- 4tb. Pi111 if . i-,.1-1,i.:.,..„' f•— �A .�p'i,.tk -fir ffir _s. . .4-- 1,1%-- \,‘.A..4. II .. ,.71 sic/pi* It. ;..f . i ... , 1 - illikiNf .. 's . YAIV j,ffiefFN--0214144rid' . it, ,. 4, . 17,,fin v ,, . - N, ilralt ir 'if, • • • VINA RA .ffit to or - 100-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION ' i��l! r1� .,,,, 6.5_. •3, ISOPLUVIALS OF 100-YEAR 24-HOUR �• I riMi O. TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES �� ,,4 Ir 5.5' 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Mlles y 1:300,000 3.5.1-13 �• yQ • 1/90 4.2 WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 10/25/99 2 :25 : 53 pm Shareware Release page 1 HOME DEPOT RENTON WA BCE JOB NO. 6254 BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: 100-SW1 NAME: 100YR-STORM SWALE 1 (NW SITE) SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 3 . 80 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE USER1 PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 . 90 inches AREA. . : 0 . 00 Acres 3 . 80 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN 0 . 00 98 . 00 TC • 0 . 00 min 5 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 PEAK RATE: 3 . 88 cfs VOL: 1 . 16 Ac-ft TIME : 470 min BASIN ID: 100-SW2 NAME: 100YR-STORM SWALE 2 (SE SITE) SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 2 . 70 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE USER1 PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 . 90 inches AREA. . : 0 . 00 Acres 2 . 70 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN • 0 . 00 98 . 00 TC • 0 . 00 min 5 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 PEAK RATE: 2 . 76 cfs VOL: 0 . 82 Ac-ft TIME: 470 min BASIN ID: 2-SW1 NAME: 2YR-STORM IN SWALE 1 (NW SITE) SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 3 . 80 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • USER1 PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 . 00 inches AREA. . : 0 . 00 Acres 3 . 80 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN 0 . 00 98 . 00 TC • 0 . 00 min 6 . 30 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 PEAK RATE : 1 . 82 cfs VOL: 0 . 56 Ac-ft TIME : 470 min BASIN ID: 2-SW2 NAME: 2YR-STORM IN SWALE 2 (SE SITE) SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 2 . 70 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE USER1 PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 . 00 inches AREA. . : 0 . 00 Acres 2 . 70 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN 0 . 00 98 . 00 TC • 0 . 00 min 6 . 30 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 PEAK RATE: 1 . 30 cfs VOL: 0 .40 Ac-ft TIME: 470 min 1, • I I ,>i \ Worksheet Worksheet for Trapezoidal Channel Project Description Project File c:\temp\6254-s1.fm2 Worksheet SIZING FOR SWALE 1 (NW OF SITE) Flow Element Trapezoidal Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Bottom Width Input Data Mannings Coefficient 0.350 Z \�s��\e e`s;'31r` Channel Slope 0.020000 ft/ft 4' Depth 0.67 ft M z Left Side Slope 3.000000 H : V Right Side Slope 3.000000 H : V Discharge 1.82 cfs Q Z y�- de , \� Results Bottom Width 5.08 ft < Flow Area 4.75 ft2 t).-5 -.\e Wetted Perimeter 9.32 ft Top Width { r SQL.\A) 9.10 ft Critical Depth 0.15 ft Critical Slope 3.460273 ft/ft Velocity 0.38 ft/s Velocity Head 0.23e-2 ft Specific Energy 0.67 ft Froude Number 0.09 Flow is subcritical. rn(ae-rsQ-\e c- be) e_NIn \N Zp© (.2-‘c\O = \do \� — Keq�v:c ` op 10/25/99 FlowMaster v5.15 02:48:16 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 (203)755-1666 Page.1 of 1 Worksheet Worksheet for Trapezoidal Channel Project Description Project File c:\temp\6254-s1.fm2 Worksheet SIZING FOR SWALE 1 (NW OF SITE) Flow Element Trapezoidal Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Input Data Mannings Coefficient 0.350 G Channel Slope 0.020000 ft/ft Left Side Slope 3.000000 H : V Right Side Slope 3.000000 H : V Bottom Width 6.55 ft < �\e`a! Discharge 1.82 cfs < Results Depth 0.59 ft Flow Area 4.95 ft2 Wetted Perimeter 10.30 ft Top Width 10.11 ft t �P�v �� —To Critical Depth 0.13 ft Critical Slope 3.606174 ft/ft Velocity 0.37 ft/s Velocity Head 0.21e-2 ft Specific Energy 0.60 ft Froude Number 0.09 Flow is subcritical. 10/25/99 FlowMaster v5.15 02:49:49 PM Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 (203)755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Worksheet Worksheet for Trapezoidal Channel Project Description Project File c:\temp\6254-s1.fm2 Worksheet SIZING FOR SWALE 1 (NW OF SITE) Flow Element Trapezoidal Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Input Data Mannings Coefficient 0.027 Channel Slope 0.020000 ft/ft Left Side Slope 3.000000 H : V Right Side Slope 3.000000 H : V Bottom Width 6.55 ft Discharge 3.88 cfs L \pO — v F\L`>,4-1 Results Depth 0.21 ft m2-1 44, a-(C), ,pH O_ Flow Area 1.50 ft2 Wetted Perimeter 7.87 ft Top Width 7.81 ft Critical Depth 0.21 ft Critical Slope 0.018478 ft/ft Velocity 2.58 ft/s Velocity Head 0.10 ft Specific Energy 0.31 ft Froude Number 1.04 Flow is supercritical. 10/25/99 FlowMaster v5.15 02:50:20 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 (203)755-1666 Page 1 of 1 U ., • Worksheet Worksheet for Trapezoidal Channel Project Description Project File c:\temp\6254-s1.fm2 Worksheet SWALE2 Flow Element Trapezoidal Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Bottom Width Input Data Mannings Coefficient 0.350 < Channel Slope 0.020000 ft/ft c / Depth 0.33 ft Left Side Slope 3.000000 H : V Right Side Slope 3.000000 H : V Discharge 1.30 cfs Z Results Bottom Width 13.44 ft < e cs e� Flow Area 4.76 ft2 Wetted Perimeter 15.52 ft Top Width 15.42 ft Critical Depth 0.07 ft Critical Slope 4.447905 ft/ft Velocity 0.27 ft/s Velocity Head 0.12e-2 ft Specific Energy 0.33 ft Froude Number 0.09 Flow is subcritical. 10/25/99 FlowMaster v5.15 02:56:09 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 (203)755-1666 Page 1 of 1 rY Worksheet Worksheet for Trapezoidal Channel Project Description Project File c:\temp\6254-s1.fm2 Worksheet SWALE2 Flow Element Trapezoidal Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Input Data Mannings Coefficient 0.027 Channel Slope 0.020000 ft/ft Left Side Slope 3.000000 H : V Right Side Slope 3.000000 H : V Bottom Width 13.44 ft Discharge 2.76 cfs < \po - \/FL. Results Depth 0.11 ft O">>I A &-3 3 t O� Flow Area 1.55 ft2 Wetted Perimeter 14.15 ft Top Width 14.11 ft Critical Depth 0.11 ft Critical Slope 0.022519 ft/ft Velocity 1.78 ft/s Velocity Head 0.05 ft Specific Energy 0.16 ft Froude Number 0.95 Flow is subcritical. 10/25/99 FlowMaster v5.15 03:07:36 PM Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 (203)755-1666 Page 1 of 1 l 5.0 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN • • r 4 s 6.0 EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DESIGN , M 7.0 PROJECT SUMMARY A w • +4 7.0 PROJECT SUMMARY We have tried to clearly present both the pre-developed and developed site conditions. With the installation of the drainage facilities and water quality facilities on site, the impact to the downstream system resulting from this project is expected to be minimal. If there are any questions regarding the proposed system or analysis, please feel free to contact us, • 6254.005[JMH/ca] DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON • NOV 05 1999 • • .I ECEIIV D . . r if WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: o t Puget Western,Inc. 19515 Northcreek Parkway,Suite 310 g i.— Bothell,WA 98011 3 p STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED- 1 A Grantor(s): Puget Sound Energy,Inc. € c Grantee(a): PugetInc.Western.In /� Abbreviated Legal: SW 17-23-05;NE 19-23 05;NW 20-23-05 h1` V i Q r Full Legal Description on page(s): 3 • lU Assessors Tax Parcel Number(s):172305-9072;192305-9090;192305-9091;202305-9008; ++ 202305-9007;202305-9008;202305-9037;202305-9050;915480-0010;202305-9028;202305 t 9148 E M1 (Y1 1 1 Grantor, Puget Sound Energy, Inc:, a Washington corporation (formerly Puget Sound Power&Light Company),for and In consideration of ten no/100($10.00)dollars and other good La valuable consideration. In hand paid, conveys and warrants to Puo r WESTERN, INC., A WASH*NGTON CORPORATION,("Grantee)the following described reel estate situated in the County • of King,State of Washington: Qr Legal Description attached hereto as Exhibit"A"and by reference made a pert hereof. i SUBJECT TO: Easements,restrictions,reservations,covenants and 15 FILED BY 2/7g5--e Dated November ` .1998. Puget •• ,, . .,,Inc. 4: 4, . By: . Its: Director,•.. •. :: Fadiltles Statutory warranty Dew Initials Renton(Orady/rabotl h t/h 7/9e 0e:14 AM PAGE-1 I ES r.r.vG . . 1J _. •d...,._„n .-.. •i:v ..4,eNN,,,,;,:.,„,,, +i:r"'..wf=b;,w y.` -aA.: . --- . .:':fli+ ?,.,,oi_,I.ig ri.-c • • . • • . • •-•••-...-..... .-••••. .••• • III • 1.. , ... ., • . A.--- •• •.•. .•.- ... . . . ..... . ... .... ......-, ,... _. - .. . . . . • • — .. ... _ . . irs • . • . . . , ! , . STATE OF WASHINGTON ) . ) es. COUNTY OF tAtAtt ) On this day of November,1998,before me.the undersigned,a Notary Public In and for the the State of Washington,duly commissioned and sworn,personally appeared R.S.McNulty, to me known to be the Director Corporate Facgtties of Puget Sound Energy.Inc.,the corporation that executed the within and foregoing Instrument.end acknowledged said Instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute said instrument WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto Woad the day and year in this certificate above written. . i ? . . ••• :-t- '1'...;; . • • NOTARY PUBUCIlrtsnd..for the. State of Washington, Viikirl, : • ci,'"4.,.• • • •i My appointgient 1-.140 • : :-.6(4•0-;•• • • i in .1- S ••••• -.3',11.:10.•••i,.-.4: :::i --•,'-' •• :. ,. . ...0.:t.s.-1—:;:j...--—- • .----.•.- .. • • kis t'i••. Xt‘'. •.Z.t 1 •-o.•7•-•"/•,/,-4•7.,-••%.5,e;.4.- e' Ltioasi.J/#0714.471-iiir. -. • . . • • - .: . GID • lel 1 . .. . re :1 CD ,i, CM 'rt. Statutory Warranty Dead Initials Renton(Grady/Talbot) • I 1/17/98 06:14 AOA PAGE-2 . . . . • -.. • • .0.,:..liai:giii- APP48,,,t4,.,:r:.• • ' -:; ::.• ''..-: ;..,.;-,,,:i,i.:*• .- . ,.,-,..,•' :,•-*fro-,4•.--.-.*,t,• -H-•-,- .4.-..• 'T ••,i,,:i•cee.;_....1'.•--tigtrf. . . • • r . ! EXHIBIT"A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A �ig,57ieN33 4-9m// 4 V--eni PARCEL A i4- I y-/7 n?'fly i LTh• That portion of Government Lot 10 in the southwest quarter of Section 17,Township 23 North. Range 5 East,W.M.,in King County,Washington,described as follows: Beginning at a point which is 445.3 feet east of the southwest corner of the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of said Section 17; thence north 150 feet: kt„m/ 4-9)/S/7,/9,Lb,Z Z thence west 57.3 feet Py7 fill thence north to the southerly line of South Grady Way; thence southwesterly along said road to the south line of said southwest quarter, thence east to the point of beginning. PARCEL B: That portion of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 19,Township 23 North, Range 5 East,W.M.,in King County,Washington,lying southerly of the south line of Walsworth's . First Addition to Renton,according to the plat thereof recorded In Volume 6 of plats.Page 23, records of King County,Washington,and easterly of the easterly line of Talbot Road South. PARCEL C: That portion of Government Lot 10,Section 17,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,in long County,Washington,and of Government Lot 1,Section 20,Township 23 North,Range 5 East, W.M.,In King County,Washington,described as follows: Beginning on the north line of said Government Lot 1 at a point 528.00 feet west of the northeast corner of said Government Lot 1; thence north 53.00 feet; thence west parallel with the south line of said Government Lot 10,a distance of 232.46 feet, CID more or less,to the east line of a tract of land deeded to Puget Sound Traction,Light and Power e.4 Company by deed recorded under King County Recording No.817107.which line is parallel with C', and 445.30 feet east of the west line of said Sections 17 and 20; thence south along said east line 313 feet,more or less,to the north line of a tract of land deeded Ct CZ to Renton Cooperative Coal Company by deed recorded December 26,1900 under King County Recording No.200930; VI thenceeasterly along said north line to the west line of the east 528.00 feet of said Government aj Lot 1; thence north along said west line 260 feet,more or less,to the point of beginning; except portion thereof lying within Main Avenue South(Benson Road South)as described in deed recorded under Recording No.2827715. Statutory Warranty Deed Initiela Renton(Grady/Talbot) 11/17/98 08:14 AM PAGE-3 • s EXHIBIT"A"(continued! PARCEL D: That portion of Government Lots 1 and 2,Section 20,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,in King County,iWashington lying westerly and northerly of primary State Highway No.1,as conveyed to the State of Washington by deeds recorded under Recording Nos.5732439 and 4924770;except any portion thereof lying within the following described parcel: That portion of Government Lot 10,Section 17,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,in King County,Washington,and of Government Lot 1,said Section 20,described as follows: Beginning on the north line of said Government 1 at a point 528.00 feet west of the northeast comer of said Government Lot 1, thence north 53.00 feet • thence west parallel with the south line of said Government Lot 10,a distance of 232.46 feet, more or less,to the east tine of a tract of land deeded to PugetSound Traction,Light and Power Company by deed recorded under King County Recording No.817107,which Tine is parallel with and 445.30 feet east of the west line of said Sections 17 and 20; thence south along said east line 313 feet,more or less,to the north line of a tract of land deeded to Renton Cooperative Coal Company by deed recorded December 26,1908 under King County Recording No.200930; thence easterly along said north line to the west line of the east 528.00 feet of said Government Lot 1; thence north'along said west line 260 feet,more or less,to the point of beginning; and except portions thereof tying within Benson Road South and South Grady Way; and except portion thereof lying easterly of Benson Road South. PARCEL E: Those portions of Becks 1 and 2,Including the unnumbered tracts adjoining the lots in Block 1, Walsworth's First Addition to Renton,according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 6 of plats. Page 23,records of King County,Washington,lying southerly of South Grady Way and northeasterly of Talbot Road South; • Together with those portions of Burnett Avenue South and South 8*Avenue vacated by City of Renton Ordnance No.2850.which attached thereto by operation of law. PARCEL F: That portion of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 19,Township 23 North, Range 5 East,W.M.,In King County,Washington,lying easterly of Talbot Road South and lying northerly of primary State Highway No.1,as conveyed to the State of Washington by deed recorded under Recording No.5754046. All situate in the County of King.State of Washington. • t , Statutory warranty Dead Initlais Renton(Grady/Talbot) n n n Ursa oo:r 4 AM PAGE-4 • • • • EXHIBIT"A"(continued) PARCEL 0: That portion of Government Lot 1,Section 20,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W,M.,In King County,Washington,lying Westerly and Northerly of Primary State Highway No.1,as conveyed to the State of Weehingbon by deeds recorded under recording numbers 5732439 and 4924770; EXCEPT portion thereof lying Westerly of the eastedy margin of Benson Road South; and EXCEPT any portion thereof lying within the following: Beginning at a point on the easterly margin of the John F.Benson County Road(Benson Rood South)which is South 25'44'34'East 934.11 feet from the northwest corner of said Government Lot 1;thence south 0'38'West 389.61 feet to the True Point of Beginning;thence south 0'38' West 109.14 feet,more or less,to the south line of said Government Lot 1:thence south 88'55' West 183.03 feet to the easterly margin of said John F.Benison County Reed;thence northeasterly along said mad,113.23 feet thence north 88'55'East 157.24 feet to the True Point of Beginning;EXCEPT any portion thereof lying within Primary State Highway No.1. • r O O t1t rl • • Statutory Wen,nry Good initiate • Raton'Grady/rabot, 11/17/9e OS:14 AM PAGE-5 • • -.ram. .�.Y4 - �+'� i�wM.iJ.:.: . r - 4'.;.!.•.„a e,+111. _-. ....(y.!:�• -'r�•l• ��'+F "'A. • 1• Y 4 ::::;�;� /I _ ' • QUIT-CLAIM DEED Y<<%.� -- -.._ ..__ - 1; li {• ir The grantor... .herein . . FUGE!' SOUND [U,Y:,;t ,S i1Ui!'f .Ul:�'i.a:, .a ]lu3eschusatts corNorntlo'n, `' ,, 1i • i3 - . . - - -..... _. . - - ill .._.r I?",furl. ,u n 11 t • -• • -tmd also of hcsafiI d, nrr.nu• In it Iw rs• ,11 of luring oat and cxLIibII hiul;a p•II Aid Ts,Id • �.� through... .Ste properl.,,nn,I NInv'. i.In•„'•r ail,•;•,1,•..'r,La•I,,,uvt•v...s,uelc sua..a::,l grasl:n::l.r.. f I': I i 7:1 '' to lhu Cuu ll,, u( I;m(r.'.InIr of \Cn.Lu,l;lnn, Ion u.r ,.i Ih.• L::ld:r'..rrrrr.a+ :, 1,r.Ll.• r..:ul :,,ul !•,:...a::' •;'I, l I, iateranL in Ow lull:,,.lug ,1.•nrn1.r11 rrnl ralnl,-. .,x.. 't'l{ , ` • __4a_, . _ , II• I All t!;e r•,rn; tors right or tl :e do that nortlo:l o: tux Lot 7, 'I I II I. ,i Beginning, a t !re: c'•,rn••r of %ov. Lotl,Sec, 20 Twp. 23 1!. R. 5 �'' - ` E.W.If.., thenc' ia..t along North 11: of said Lot, 449', thence 'I 1: ',•'1'' ' ,1 South. 250' thence South 99445' 'N. 14.9' thence' South 49430' E Sl • '0 "119.3'•' thence.:;. 99°45 E. 357' thence South 400 feet, thence N. 830.46' .t„►'•�i 1 I , •' • I: ' thence N. 860' to beginning, lying within e strip of lend 80' in 1 \ ' . • • • Width 30.' of such width lying on each side of the followtn?'deeorlbed . I! ' 1' center line: IIE i:, .1 I t 1I i, ' Beginning at S•t. 19+74.09 of Sur. No. 1009-d, Sec. 20, 'Pwp.23 ' �;j ! 1 • _ N.R. 5 E.'R.L'., thence along a curve to the right having a radius • ,. � ",l . - " 'of 573.14' for i str:nce of 419.93' thence S. 42445'30" W. a • •,1 1• •i, --- : aTstence of 15,39' thence along a curve to the left having a radius i I'•!' ;t::}'^ of 573.14' - ._ 'c distance of 196.83' Sta. 24+9 -.13 = Ste. 25+17,35it'llt 1 ' .;.' ahead, ."ur. No.1009-d. • l ±II1,11';-�1 Together with the right to construct and .'nalntaln cut and !' I'll c{ 1 "•I' , [fil1 slope' o'itslde'-of right-of- ey. . 19 4�rltii •I l Ii'.i,:la,l I.,• i ._ Containing 0.24 ayes :no;e or lens. • 1�Ip..1:111;1..' , I ;4 •Rig::t-of-way J.F. Benson Road Revisi :c Fill 71r1c.•e No.90 Road. • .' 1 I• , ,ii,Ih ' 1 1 �, C. x 1 • l ,• IT I`�,1 .! '..:..1::. , � �. ,R • I , DavELOPMEi T P I!!I I '. !! I PLANNING f�tiff{` 1l ', - =.. .. . , j'it1�. 1�'j .j . TON „ . i CITY OF 4�ER! : If tl :' , NOV 05 1999 • l !I{ ,I f - ,!:• !)..I. • ;'III �:I1ISi_;: • • • : t:, c . • j1 1 .1• ,'r, i --.— _ ar.?!9`• :fit "f 1. "sittrtrri In I),.•t ,.:,,• u." .I h Ala:,•,a •\ I,:,. ,:,,4:.u._ . . • • ,. ' --trlclr ntln I -tl;t>•oL.��//L4�� I A I' I:,•I '1- f.V'.ri•sf • `` • >;" • - �Yuget sound.Bower. a. Light.C.or..n ny ¶'h' i1 'I. 'jl, ! ;yn, <. �•• • .. . ... . ay Y ��• gyp` , ...... ram.. : •:... �r 0 3 ' a • /tl• "*C�: ` Attest., �.' _, i .41 ' .. ..-. ';�.If fil:'..' tl .. .� 3I t,;. ,..,,.., .. . . ._ • �r I I II . • .. . • . .. ..' I ( I 1j .... , • • . •• , • .•'.. . • ' . . . ••, iv, .. 1;,-:..., r: •. . . . •- • • •- . . • ;i. 14 r. .i.!, i•-,2) il • ,..• „."..‘,... .. i • . ., •... . . A 10.1 • ;; ' . - • - " - • . .., 1 !. •,'. i • . . . i.' lik 1.•e iii • 1 I • . . .. : . • .... . Ls. ••Il i .... . . • • .• . . .. . . ...., _ ... .. . .... . . . . . . . . .. •.. . . . . . ., , . , • . . . ,,. . .• . . • • • . o. .- '... •• ,• ,•,.. . • -- . . . • 44. ' k ";;•.' 1:i! , 'III. : 1! II; • ,;.i„ I . . . . ".'',.•-,.,4::r...,,,.W:•.::1 1, . . . . . • • • • . - • -.. :• - •--:#:-'4e- • .... .,-. .....• 1 ,.: A . -1. • .. . . . .. . -7 ----:'.;.',11.: .:'. • - ' • .-. 11. , ,i-1.1 f • • .. . .•-•••• . . . . ..'. .1.:•:...'......... - ,k• 2__. 1.i f': 41 ' 1141. ,.. •1 1 i Is • - •TE OF WASHING.1.r • 1 • i'.' ' .' COUNTY 0"-q..• i ;• L '1;!:1: • 1 . : - oS-S-.7-....7.77. T-7-::'7 ,-......,.....193 -.1:T9re Rei.i 0. :.;,.P........ *1 '.' 1111'i : i • • .:•,._.- -....---,-_--.on-1414 ... 411rI igicl 1 , -r-•itt and ftr tEe Slate of'W-asitin•r..,...-"V,cOniiiiiaii,iell.aruisrit, iteoatially enMe ... ... •.. ......7'4 -.7.• ••1 ••• .... -7.#111•1. VI4 Il __ , .. i .._.. ...--- .. _ • .,_ ' • - - • • . ... ... . ..... ... .-.._., •.••••....:...lo •anwit to he the individual-. I.1 . . . 1 •?....4 li .. 11.1; . ' • described in and, ..:. executed the withininst.:Innen, al ._ .m•Itolged ta me Out......... ....-:,.zigned,and. -,,•• Iii. ii.. li ... • __ .. ..1.1 111C 411111e ti ...•... ,free tuitl valuator• alai deed .., le asps and pal-wises therein mentioned. i' • '. . Witness my 11111111 1111(1(014141 k'' me day and year.iit•A alea.e.writtett. . •• - . • . ... .... ... . . .. .. .. , • ... i ••• t.1: '•:"t 4. •..? 1'1! i 4. .4 •.' ''4 • ' I ,.., , o' i • , . . N..i.iry 1. c in 41,d fir the Stale of Washicgton,reoiding at - :. . ............ •• -.. I ." •:• i •C. i i I I 1 ''''. ...,,,.. ;-.. • - '1';.”I I., '1 • . •!til • .1 . • • ,• ' •. ... • . . . illi I I I. t. • - ' . .. •i.4,•,. i '. ' I ' 11 ' , - ' .. sTArk:OF WLSNINOTO. .W11:1s-so. . . .. iro",I t. Otnfrf'. l•-•-9F-34.1g6 • ) • . •. •• ''• : . ..,'.. ''. :-..-....LII iii !".'; it ''. ' • .„."':,:s-'."•_Yil- . . . - • •,t' , L 1 4, :. ' . i la 21 I ., .. • I li .•. • - • _:, •• . . . . • .., 1,•the undersigned, a Notat---,71>ublic in and for the State of Waahingtoni •.,,---4 , ,,.1 - , • .. ,•ID „ . .0, . . , do'hereby certify that on this >5/•-day of(-•°-<.•-,-,'•--7e,•- , 1934, peraonally appeared '..,... ;1•21 i t J'''r! tl,' • ' : • 4•Illi , . ':. -- -• • before meleerLY. Z,...„..,- land ,.......4/....,., 4. .`f......<z.e.. to me lcflown •:-7. ,. . - f• . L:••••- . tl i, to be the Vice president and Aso i atan,1 .7oci•ntory :•est.ce•-.1vnly of the coryoration.that - . . If".iI• 11:;i41.4 ' • . c :. i••:11 1 • . . , .0:ter:tie:cid the withi.ti instrument and noknow;edged said instrumvtt to be the free and •; •._ Si--44..:.,E-4.44..a.,. .,)1,-_,A,..,. ,m-..,...,„. .),-..---- -,-.4.,0•-:.!. voluntary act and deed of said °corporation aiici on/oath 5 t•Lated that Ift ey were authorized . . . - iik11: :I• i ' • l'i r •1 . • 1 .n ,• . . . -A i..i.: 1 i . . .- . .... :.: to• execute said:Ixts...traent-and•that-7tbe-seal-affixed la.the corrore:o seal. of Said •.'i • r.j..• 7 t ,t . . . . .. •_F 1 . .,,,, . , . .. . • .1...1--.2[Iii 1 ,1 corporation. .. :"-S1:) - ....-. . , • `it-4!lib 11 ' • • - - 14:: 1 1 _ .......,...__... ..._...._.,._. 94%...___Ln__11. P.desr___my_. .1setid.. -and-off-Join 1-seal-the-do': nitir ycii? 1 irat abor) • S. l . " - F.; f • . . ......i.:4 . • ----.----written. -• ••• .: •• ' . . . .... • •- • •. .--(../ . ". '';1. 1' • ' -• - .•. t., 1! I 4 - .,.;i:," -.-..... . . A •--- /..c!L•': ,-r...k., ,.,,1.• • j ...1 I * . 1 i 3.r' !i. • . . . :•-•:'wNaotshairynctE.1211.iCre isii:di•nnic..t.Cdr.:the:;ilk%.0f• .;' ',' • - •• . :i I;i g !! • .: 1 . .- -,I • ; - . . • • .. . . . . . et,Shttt14. ',...•., : .1; • • _ .-- • . . . . -, • . I:i ..f, I % • - . • '• '1". 1'44 :I _ . . -...w.ft .1 -. I . ...r1 • .; . • • , . . . . . . 11::.:e..11,,:./. • - .:•-• - ; ' - • • . . „,..____,,,,,... ..... . • .- „... ,...,,.I..1, -11. 2 • . .i • . di ,....1 2f--. ..-...--;119.,II......• --. -7.. . , ... .i ...:2, : .O' 5- -' ----= I ., 1! 1 f. 1:•,.11.1 • I: :: 1 • - . krs• .• • • a -- ----r.,' .;,4 . : • g . RECORDED VOL ... OF • .- - - .. .E-' -----!--.PACE.........-_- !:?2LIEST.OF . \.... ,S.:.., :••2.-• ,t •.-.1,... 1 i -:!'&17;.'''':--••••''''.•-•• 1 •••• a . .. = . 'i. '.. ::1111 4.1 6 . " ...n •.- • . . . . --Ali:. - 1 i''• i ; . -- . • ......1 I f,..-L:-..z______I . .- 8 rR 1934 tICV r...1 12 25 - • '•••.:-. ',.-.:' • . •-1-- .iiir i.,• • • • s.Ja:/: I • - - •"! •-..E.-)" ! ..--. •• . - • -- . .i 04. - • • . .".. ... , . -• ....-,....-. , .-- ...,... I-- --... , . i .___ . GEORGE A.CR;,:•/I- AUDITOR. ...„_,...._, ...., • - '1- :•.i.?,1 ill : :. •-*--. '• •'-a--- ' "i.1,. ' •i-r•-1- . I' 1•1[2r•: r" .1" t1.4•.,l'1!:I' ' .':. --'-• .:!•-.,:=.:::::•••;}:n.,! ..• •. -.. -K.ING•CO•U N T..Y. 1 61 r DE PU TY . . • .•...•.-,•,.•.'•4..•i,'•;'•:7•;•,•,,P•"'.•:A.„•.'0•1•1 ..•‘.i.e-•:..:•.'.--1-:...•......f... • ..-..-:- •• ' - .j; ...IR 14 1. 1 . 71i1•k -12( -...1.'.r. .% .. . 4/.•-,.747••••e•-7:•••':V••4 ftc,--- ,, !4•1 •-•• •' - -sa .....,- '. paets,:-.,:".4.'iogittiN: •..teiiikt,V4Ai--;••••,.,,„•!:•.... .• ' ..• • . , __.- . ," .. • - • ..- • - ' 111:11':•••i'.1 • A-•il •. . . . :-- '3 i:51 .....i.1=1:1:34 • . . . . .• .• , , .. . • . . . . . . ' • :*** 1* - -'''.• i: .. .. . . • . • . . •• ._ .:• .....:":-.-. . -x.9.. • . . . . ' - .,: •-•!...;•,-.,,,i;----4 . • • fr qg ,i5 7 (9) DRAFT, . 42 ot- 3,7 1 • „ ,Y;tgv Report Geotechnical Engineering Services Proposed Home Depot Development Renton, Washington October 15, 1999 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON NOV 05 1999 RECEIVED For Home Depot, U.S.A. G e o E n g i n e e r s File No. 2401-119-00-1130 1, DRAFT CONTENTS Page No. INTRODUCTION 1 k H SCOPE 2 INTRODUCTION 2 PREVIOUS STUDIES 3 SITE CONDITIONS 4 SURFACE CONDITIONS 4 EXISTING PSE BUILDINGS 4 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 4 General 4 Home Depot Building 5 East Retaining Wall 6 Parking Areas 7 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 7 GENERAL 7 SITE PREPARATION AND EARTHWORK 8 General 8 Site Preparation 9 Wet Weather Construction 9 Structural Fill 10 I; Permanent Slopes 11 Temporary Slopes 12 l: FOUNDATION SUPPORT 12 General 12 Axial Capacity 13 Downdrag 13 Lateral Capacity 14 Pile Settlement 15 Construction Considerations 15 FLOOR SLABS 15 PYLON SIGN AND LIGHT POLE FOUNDATIONS 16 RETAINING WALLS 16 Conventional Retaining Walls 16 EAST SLOPE RETAINING WALL 17 General 17 Soldier Piles 17 Lagging 18 Tiebacks 1 g Drainage 19 LATERAL RESISTANCE 19 UTILITY EXCAVATIONS 20 PAVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS 20 Asphalt Concrete Pavements 20 PCC Pavements 21 ENTRIES, SIDEWALKS AND UTILITIES 21 G e o E n g i n e e r s FileNo. 2401-119-00-1130\101599 DRAFT if ' CONTENTS (CONTINUED) 77 GROUND WATER AND DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS 22 SEISMIC DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 22 Seismicity 22 UBC Design Considerations 22 Design Earthquake 22 Liquefaction Potential and Settlement 23 Mitigation of Liquefaction Induced Settlement 23 FROST PENETRATION 23 k , CORROSIVITY 24 SOIL GASES 24 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS 24 LIMITAT IONS 24 FIGURES Figure No. VICINITY MAP 1 SITE PLAN 2 BEDROCK CONTOUR MAP 3 r? CROSS SECTION A-A' 4 CROSS SECTION B-B' • 5 CROSS SECTION C-C' 6 EARTH PRESSURE DIAGRAM 7 APPENDICES Page No. APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATIONS A-1 APPENDIX A FIGURES Figure No. SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM A-1 KEY TO BORING LOG SYMBOLS A-2 LOG OF BORING A-3...A-21 LOG OF TEST PIT A-22 APPENDIX B LABORATORY TESTING B-1 GENERAL B-1 VISUAL CLASSIFICATIONS B-1 MOISTURE CONTENT B-1 DRY DENSITY B-1 SIEVE ANALYSIS B-1 ATTERBERG LIMITS B-2 CORROSION TESTING B-2 APPENDIX B FIGURES Figure No. ATTERBERG LIMITS TEST RESULTS B-1 G e o E n g i n e e rs File No. 2401-119-00-1130\101599 t' DRAFT • REPORT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES PROPOSED HOME DEPOT DEVELOPMENT RENTON, WASHINGTON FOR �• HOME DEPOT U.S.A. z INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our geotechnical engineering services for the proposed Home Depot development to be located in Renton, Washington. The location of the site and the general configuration of the property are shown on the Vicinity Map and the Site Plan, Figures 1 and 2,respectively. Our understanding of the project is based on information provided by Greenberg Farrow Architecture including a preliminary site plan prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers Inc., dated September 9, 1999. We understand that the proposed development will include a Home Depot store situated near the east boundary of the site. A small restaurant site is shown along the ! west property boundary adjacent to Talbot Road (SR-515). The Home Depot store will encompass 117,064 square feet with an outdoor garden center of 14,790 square feet. Paved parking areas will primarily be located to the northwest and west of the Home Depot store. Due to constraints on the east side of the property, a retaining wall is planned east of the access road near the northeast corner of the Home Depot store and adjacent to Benson Road. We understand that the Home Depot store will be single-story. The exterior walls will either be load bearing concrete or mason ry walls with uniformly spaced interior columns; or non-load bearing masonry with uniformly spaced exterior and interior columns. Per the Design Criteria Manual,loads for the Home Depot will be as follows: • Columns- 120 kips • I Load bearing walls-5,000 pounds per lineal foot • Floor slabs on grade-650 pounds per square foot maximum live load • 1Pavement loading - standard duty; 50,000 equivalent axle loads, 10-year design, 3,500 vehicle passes per day,7 days per week • Pavement loading-heavy duty; 220,000 equivalent axle loads, 10-year design,26 semitrailer 'trucks per day, 7 days per week Based on discussions with the structural engineer, Barry Levine and Associates, we z understand that pile foundations should have a 100-ton allowable axial capacity and 20-to 25-kip lateral capacity with 1 inch deflection of the pile head. We understand from the site civil engineer, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc., that the proposed Home Depot floor slab and parking lot elevations will be at or near existing site grades. G e o E n g i n e e rs 1 File No. 2401-119-00-1130\1015599 DRAFT SCOPE INTRODUCTION The purpose of our services is to complete a number of shallow and deep borings to explore subsurface soil and ground water conditions at the site as a basis for developing geotechnical recommendations for the proposed development. Our proposed scope of services is presented b . below. Our recommendations are provided in general accordance with The Home Depot Design " Criteria Manual (National Edition), dated February 8, 1999. Specifically, our scope of services includes the following: 1. Review existing information on subsurface soil and ground water conditions at the site, available in our files. 2. Mark and clear all boring locations prior to drilling. A private utility locate service was used to locate and clear the proposed boring locations. 3. Explore the subsurface soil and ground water conditions at the site by drilling ten borings to bedrock in and around the proposed Home Depot building footprint, drilling one boring and excavating one test pit in the vicinity of the proposed east retaining wall, and drilling eight shallow borings in the proposed parking areas and'in the south gravel area. 4. ,Evaluate the physical and engineering characteristics of the soils based on laboratory tests !performed on samples obtained from the explorations. The laboratory tests included moisture content, dry density, plasticity, and particle size determinations. In addition, three corrosivity tests were performed. 5. Provide recommendations for the site in accordance with Part Two, Section VI—"Foundation engineering and site preparation evaluation and recommendations," as outlined in the Design Criteria Manual. This included the following: '• Recommendations for site preparation and grading, including temporary and permanent slopes, shoring requirements, fill placement criteria, suitability of on-site soils for fill, and subgrade preparation. • Foundation support of the structure and slabs, including appropriate pile types, allowable axial capacities,lateral capacities,and estimated settlement. 1 • Depth to ground water. • Lateral earth pressures for design of retaining walls and below-grade walls, and recommendations for backfill,compaction and drainage,and lateral resistance values. • Pavement designs for parking, automobile traffic and heavy truck loads, including section thickness and pavement subgrade preparation. • Recommendations for temporary excavation and temporary protection such as excavation sheeting,underpinning and temporary dewatering systems. • Stability of temporary and permanent cut and fill slopes. • Geotechnical seismic design information, including UBC site coefficient,design acceleration and potential for liquefaction. • Frost penetration depth. G e o E n g i n e e r s 2 File No. 2401-119-00-113011015599 •• . DRAFT • Analysis of soils to ascertain presence of potentially expansive,deleterious,chemically active or corrosive materials or conditions,or presence of gaseous substances. • Slab-on-grade requirements,including anticipated subgrade modulus and requirements for subgrade preparation,vapor retarders and capillary break layers. r • Wet weather recommendations,including the effect of weather and/or construction equipment on soil during construction. 6. Prepare a draft report containing our observations, conclusions and recommendations along with the supporting data. Four copies will be submitted to Greenberg Farrow Architecture and one to Home Depot. 7. Finalize the report as necessary to respond to reviewer comments and provide four copies of the report to Home Depot and six copies of the report to Greenberg Farrow Architecture. 8. Review the project plans and specifications for conformance to the geotechnical report. a PREVIOUS STUDIES GeoEngineers has performed environmental studies at the site for PSE, which have included numerous shallow borings, monitoring wells and test pits. Most of the available information pertains to shallow subsurface conditions. We have also performed geotechnical evaluations for office buildings to the west of Talbot Road across from the site and for the existing Renton City Hall building north of the site. The reports we reviewed included: • "Report,Geotechnical Engineering Services,Two Renton Place,Renton,Washington", dated May 9, 1985 • "Report of Geotechnical Engineering Studies, Proposed Office Building, South Grady Way -Z and Main Avenue South,Renton,Washington for E&H Enterprises",dated July 30, 1985 • "Report, Geotechnical Engineering Services, Three Renton Place, Renton, Washington for Renton Village Company",dated April, 1986 • "Report, Geotechnical Engineering Services, Proposed Village Place North Office Building and Parking Garage,Renton,Washington,for Renton Village Associates" dated February 24, 1992 • "Environmental Site Assessment, Grady Way Complex Property, Renton, Washington for Puget Sound Energy",dated April 29, 1998 • "Report, 1998 Site Cleanup Activities, Grady Way Complex Property, Renton, Washington, Volume I of II for Puget Sound Energy", dated December 23, 1998 The information presented in these reports was reviewed and incorporated into our geotechnical evaluation of the subsurface conditions at the site. i GeoEngineers 3 File No. 2401-119-00-1130\1015599 DRAFT r^) SITE CONDITIONS SURFACE CONDITIONS The site is bounded by Benson Road South on the east, Renton City Hall on the north, South Grady Way on the northwest, and Talbot Road (SR 515) on the west. The south side of the property is adjacent to an undeveloped area. The site is currently developed and occupied by two Puget Sound Energy (PSE) buildings which were part of their Grady Way Complex. The buildings are abandoned, but some of the utilities are still in service. The portion of the site where the Home Depot building and parking areas are proposed is relatively flat at about Elevation 20 to 22 feet. Most of the areas surrounding the buildings are covered with asphalt concrete pavement with some smaller gravel-surfaced areas. The south side of the property consists of a large, relatively flat gravel-surfaced area at about Elevation 18 feet. A raised asphalt concrete pavement and concrete loading area,about 3 feet high, is located to the south and west of the existing westernmost PSE building. Benson Road South bounds the east side of the property and is about 30 to 40 feet above the site grades. The existing slope and embankment fill from Benson Road down the to the property is inclined at about 2H:1V(horizontal to vertical) or flatter. A lobe of fill extends into the northeast portion of the site where the northeast corner of the Home Depot store will be located. The fill lobe is 25 to 30 feet above the site grades and is covered with blackberries, brush and deciduous trees. The west corner of the site is vegetated with blackberries and other brush. Numerous above and underground utilities are located throughout the site, including a 100-foot wide easement for aboveground transmission lines that crosses the site in an east-west direction south of the Home Depot store footprint. EXISTING PSE BUILDINGS These existing PSE buildings were constructed using concrete masonry blocks. The buildings are supported on timber piling. Based on a review of selected plan sheets provided by PSE, the timber piles have 7- to 8-inch minimum tip diameters and were designed for 15- to 20-ton axial capacities. Pile tip elevations were not available. Notes on one of the drawings we reviewed indicated that the piles be driven full length or to refusal. The pile spacing for most of the buildings was not available; however, a portion of the Transfer Center remodel has piles spaced at about 10 feet on center with some two and three pile groups spaced at 3-foot on center. The outside of the buildings showed signs of distress consisting of'A-to 1/2-inch wide cracks in the masonry blocks at various locations. The cracking suggests that the buildings have likely settled to some degree. This may indicate that the pile foundations may not have penetrated deeply enough into suitable bearing stratum. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS General We evaluated subsurface soil and ground water conditions at the site by drilling a total of 19 borings(B-1 through B-19)and excavating one test pit(TP-1). The approximate locations of the explorations are shown on the Site Plan, Figure 2. A description of the exploration program and G e o E n g i n e e r s 4 File No. 2401-119-00-113011015599 DRAFT •F . • i logs of the explorations are presented in Appendix A. The results of the laboratory testing program is presented in Appendix B. The subsurface soil and ground water conditions at the site are described in the following • paragraphs for three areas of the site; the proposed Home Depot building area, the proposed parking areas,and the proposed east retaining wall. Home Depot Building General subsurface soil and ground water conditions in the vicinity of the proposed Home i = Depot building footprint were explored by drilling ten deep borings (B-1 through B-9, and B-11) to depths between about 34.5 and 95.8 feet below the existing ground surface. The subsurface soils within the proposed Home Depot building footprint were highly variable across the building area. The explorations encountered coal tailings and other fill materials overlying alluvial deposits with sandstone bedrock at depth. In general, the sandstone bedrock e surface is steeply dipping to the west across the building footprint, which coincides with an increasing thickness of the- alluvium. The estimated elevation of the competent sandstone bedrock is shown on Figure 3 and on the three cross sections drawn through the building area in Figures 4 through 6. The general soil units and ground water conditions are described below. r• Existing Pavement. The existing pavement section in the building area consists of about 2 to 5 inches of asphalt concrete over 3 to 12 inches of base course consisting of medium dense gravel with sand and a trace of silt. Y ;Coal Tailings. Coal tailings consisting of black coal mixed with zones of silty sand sandstone spoils have been deposited across much of the building site. The coal tailings were apparently mined from the hill to the east and deposited downslope on the property. Coal tailings were encountered in all the borings located in and around the building footprint, except B-11. The;coal tailings encountered in the borings are generally 6 to 10 feet thick and were deposited directly over native alluvial soils. Up to 14 feet of coal tailings were encountered in B-8 located near the southwest building corner. The coal tailings were,generally very soft to soft with blow counts(N-value)in the range of 1 to 6,with typical values around 2 to 3. The northeast corner of the Home Depot building is located in an area where a large vegetated lobe extends west from the Benson Road embankment. This lobe extends from about Elevation 24 feet up to about Elevation 54 feet at its maximum height. Observations indicate that the lobe consists primarily of coal tailings. Test pit TP-1 was excavated at the top of the lobe near'the location of the proposed retaining wall. Black coal tailings were encountered to the full depth of the test pit at 15 feet. Alluvium. Alluvial soils were encountered in all of the borings and the thickness of the alluvium varied considerably from east to west across the site. The alluvium generally consists of very soft to medium stiff silt, organic silt, clay and peat, and very loose to medium dense silty G e o,En g i n e ers 5 File No. 2401-119-00-1130\1015599 r •- DRAFT • sand,sand,and gravel deposits. The thickness and location of the organic silt and peat deposits is highly variable. Up to 11 feet of organic silt and peat was encountered in B-2 located on the east side of the building. Layers of peat deposits were encountered as deep as 63 feet below the ground surface as observed in B-8. Figures 4 through 6 present east-west cross sections of the subsurface profile through the building footprint. The locations of the cross sections are shown on Figures 3. Along the eastern edge of the building alluvium was encountered to about 28, 32 and 34 feet below the ground `' surface in B-1, B-2 and B-4, respectively. Along the western side of the building alluvium was } encountered to about 68, 80 and 91 feet below the ground surface in B-11, B-3 and B-8, respectively. Sandstone Bedrock. Bedrock consisting of sandstone was encountered at depth in all of the deep borings drilled at the site. The "Geologic Map of the Renton Quadrangle, King County, Washington"by D.R. Mullineaux, dated 1965, identifies this as an arkosic sandstone that is part of the Renton Formation. This sandstone formation is a source of coal. The sandstone surface under the site dips steeply to the west. A bedrock elevation map (Figure 3)was developed based on the depth to competent sandstone encountered in the borings and on the elevations taken from the preliminary survey map by Barghausen Consulting Engineers Inc., dated September 15, 1999. The bedrock contours shown on Figure 3 are approximate elevations of the competent sandstone. A zone of weathered sandstone 10 feet thick and 5 feet thick was encountered in B-11 and B-5, respectively, above the competent sandstone bedrock. The weathered surface of the sandstone appears to increase in thickness from east to west across the building footprint. Ground Water. Ground water was encountered in all of the borings at depths ranging from 5 to 14 feet below the ground surface. Ground water levels are expected to fluctuate as a function of season,precipitation and other factors. Ground water measurements performed for some of the PSE studies indicate that the ground water surface can be up to about 2 feet below the existing ground surface on the eastern portion of the site. East Retaining Wall Subsurface soil and ground water conditions in the vicinity of the proposed retaining wall on the northeast side of the Home Depot building were explored by drilling one deep boring (B-12) ( and excavating one test pit(1P-1). Boring B-12 was drilled to a depth of 33.5 feet below the ground surface and was terminated due to refusal in the very dense sandstone. Subsurface conditions encountered in B-12 consisted of about 8 feet of loose silty sand fill over about 9 feet of soft/loose coal tailings. The sandstone formation was encountered at about 17 feet below the ground surface. G e o E n g i n e e r s 6 File No. 2401-119-00-1130\1015599 DRAFT Test pit TP-1 was excavated to a depth of about 15 feet below the ground surface near the top of the knob extending out from the Benson Road embankment. Loose, relatively dry, black coal tailings and sandstone spoils were encountered for the full depth of the test pit. t " No ground water was encountered in B-12 or TP-1, but a thin moist to wet layer was observed in B-12 at a depth of about 10.5 feet. This may be a zone where ground water seepage is present. Parking Areas "' Eight additional shallow borings(B-10, and B-13 through B-19)were drilled in the proposed parking areas and in the gravel area south of the proposed building. The borings were completed to 11.5 feet below the ground surface. The borings in the parking areas encountered asphalt concrete, base course, coal tailings, and alluvium. The pavement and soils are similar to those described above for the Home Depot building area. The coal tailings encountered in the southwest parking areas (B-16, B-17, and B-18) extended deeper than 11.5 feet (the depth explored). Boring B-10 drilled in the south parking lot encountered about a 9.5-foot thickness of coal tailings over alluvium. Borings B-14 and;B-15 drilled on the north side of the west parking lot encountered about a 6-foot thickness of coal tailings over alluvium. Boring B-13 was drilled in the parking area to the north of the building and encountered coal tailings about 10-feet thick over alluvium. During drilling,a strong petroleum odor was detected, • and,a sheen on the water used to clean the sampler was observed. f 9 i Ground water was encountered in all of the borings,except B-18 and B-19,at depths ranging 7-1 from about 10 to 10.5 feet below the ground surface. No ground water was encountered in B-18 and IB-19. Ground water levels are expected to fluctuate as a function of season,precipitation and other factors. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL Based on the results of our subsurface exploration program and subsurface conditions observed in explorations completed for previous studies, it is our opinion that the site is suitable for the proposed Home Depot development; however, pile foundations, will be necessary to adequately support the building. A summary of primary goetechnical considerations for the proposed development is provided below. The summary is presented for introductory purposes only and should be used in conjunction with the complete recommendations presented in this report. • The proposed Home Depot building should be supported on pile foundations extending down to the competent sandstone bedrock. We recommend that 18-inch auger cast piles be used to achieve an axial pile capacity of 100 tons. • Slabs for the Home Depot building should include a methane gas ventilation system. Conceptually, this system should consist of a layer of coarse sand or gravel, a vapor barrier G e o,E n g i n e e r s 7 File No. 2401-119-00-1130\1015599 3 DRAFT and perforated PVC pipes. The sand and gravel layer will also serve as a capillary break • layer under the slab. • Existing near surface soils immediately below the pavement and base course materials consist of coal tailings. These soils are typically very moist and well above the optimum moisture content and will be difficult to impossible to work and compact. Further, the tailings will break down under mechanical action of earth moving equipment and become softened if exposed to water. Therefore, we recommend that excavation into the tailings be avoided wherever possible. • The alluvium under the site has a high susceptibility to settlement under additional loads due to the presence of organic soils. We estimate that more than 1-foot of total primary settlement could occur under the planned building loads. Additional settlement would also L3 'occur due to secondary consolidation of these soils over time. • The alluvium underlying the site has a high risk of liquefaction for the design earthquake. We estimate that 4 to 8 inches of total settlement may occur at the site due to liquefaction resulting from the design earthquake. • The east retaining wall is located in an area where cuts up to 30 feet high will be required to achieve the site proposed grades. The cut will encounter a significant amount of coal tailings. Further, the wall will be about 30 feet high at the north end where it is very close (about 12 'feet) from the Benson Road right-of-way. Due to the site constraints in this area, the wall will require special desig n pe considerations that may include a very high cantilevered wall with the soldier piles socketed into competent sandstone. The site constraints, the possibility of t A using permanent tiebacks that would extend into the Benson Road right-of-way, or socketed soldier piles need further evaluation. • SITE PREPARATION AND EARTHWORK General Detailed information regarding proposed finished grades for the planned development were _1 not available when we prepared our report. However, based on preliminary discussions with Barghausen Consulting Engineers Inc., we understand that finished grades for the building and parking areas will be at or near existing site grades,Elevation 20 to 22 feet. In order to minimize post construction settlement, any filling that may be required to achieve planned site grades should be done at the onset of the construction activity. Final grading and paving should be delayed as long as possible so that the majority of the settlement is complete. Most of the site is covered with 2 to 5 inches of asphalt concrete pavement and up to 12 inches of base course material. We recommend that the asphalt concrete and base course • materials remain in place wherever possible to provide adequate support for construction equipment. Where it is necessary to remove the asphalt concrete and/or base materials to achieve grade,the exposed soils will likely consist of coal tailings that are susceptible to disturbance from construction equipment due to their low strength and high moisture content. We expect that operation of equipment across these soils, especially during periods of wet weather, will be very G e oE n g i n e e r s 8 FileNo. 2401-119-00-1130\1015599 g r „ DRAFT c difficult and will likely result in disturbance of the exposed soils. Where cuts are planned in the coal tailings, it will be necessary to overexcavate about 1 to 2 feet of the coal tailings, place a woven geotextile separator (Mirafi 500X or equal) over the exposed soils, and backfill to the desired grade with quarry spalls,crushed rock,recycled concrete,or a gravel/sand pit run material to provide a firm surface to support construction equipment. Site preparation procedures for dry weather and wet weather conditions are discussed in the following sections. Site Preparation i-L The trees and vegetation should be cleared and grubbed and the surficial topsoil and vegetative root mass be stripped and removed from the building, pavement, and retaining wall 3 areas. Based on our explorations, we anticipate that the stripping depth on the lobe and in the west corner of the property will generally be about 6 to 12 inches. Following stripping, we recommend that the exposed subgrade soils in the building and pavement areas be thoroughly proofrolled with heavily loaded construction equipment if site preparation is done during extended dry weather conditions. Soft.or otherwise unsuitable areas revealed during proofrolling that cannot be compacted to a stable and uniformly firm condition must be either scarified, aerated and recompacted, or overexcavated and replaced with structural fill compacted to the recommended compaction criteria presented subsequently. The depth to u which soils must be scarified, recompacted, removed and/or replaced should be evaluated by a representative from GeoEngineers. We recommend that as much of the existing asphalt concrete and base course be left in place as possible to provide support for construction equipment,provided that it does not interfere with 13• installation of piles and utilities. After demolition of the existing buildings and structures the debris should be removed from the site. The existing buildings are supported on timber pile foundations. It will be necessary to remove pile caps and cut off existing piles that interfere with the planned Home Depot improvements or foundation elements. We recommend that the existing piles be cut off at least 2 feet below the bottom of new pile caps within the Home Depot building footprint and parking areas to reduce the potential for developing "bumps" as settlement of the subsurface soils occurs. Existing utilities that will be abandoned can be left in-place provided that pipes larger than 4 inches in diameter be grouted full to prevent potential collapse or migration of water. Existing voids (i.e. manholes or vaults) or new depressions created during site preparation should be cleaned of loose soil or debris and backfilled with structural fill or control density fill(CDF). Wet Weather Construction If site preparation is done during wet weather, earthwork and construction operations should be planned to reduce the exposure of subgrade areas to wet weather and construction traffic. During wet weather topsoil and root mass should be stripped with lightweight equipment and construction traffic should be kept off the exposed areas. GeoEngineers 9 File No. 2401-119-00-1130\1015599 x., DRAFT E ' t The exposed subgrade should be evaluated by a representative from GeoEngineers who will probe the exposed area to identify areas of soft or yielding soils that should be replaced. These soft areas should be overexcavated to the depth recommended by the geotechnical engineer. Upon the recommendation of the geotechnical engineer, the contractor should be prepared to s� place a woven fabric such as Mirafi 500X or other fabric with similar properties to provide separation between the exposed soils and the structural fill as well as some stabilization. 'Other wet weather considerations are as follows: • 'The.storm drainage system should be installed early in the sequence of earthwork activities to provide a means of removing surface water. • Structural fill consisting of a thickness of at least 12 inches of free draining sand and gravel with less than 5 percent fines by weight of the 3/4-inch minus material and a layer of geotextile fabric such as Mirafi 500X will be required in building slab and pavement areas, where the pavement is not left in place. The on-site soils including the coal tailings and alluvium are fine-grained and will not meet the free-draining criterion. Alternatively, the upper 12 inches of subgrade material may be treated with cement provided that this is acceptable with the City of Renton. • On-site fill, coal tailings and most of the native alluvium in utility trenches will not be suitable for reuse as structural fill in the trenches. `We recommend that free draining trench backfill material should be included in the budget. • Haul routes and material layout areas planned over the exposed coal tailings or alluvium should be constructed consisting of at least 18 inches of clean sand and gravel, crushed rock, ballast or quarry spalls and a layer of geotextile fabric. Alternatively, a 4-to 6-inch thickness of ATB (asphalt treated base)may be placed to protect subgrades where construction traffic will operate. If wet weather construction is expected, we recommend that Home Depot develop a plan to incorporate wet weather considerations into the project plans,specifications,schedule and budget. Structural Fill General. Fill in building and pavement areas should be placed and compacted as structural 3 fill. If overexcavation of unsuitable soils beneath parking areas or slabs is necessary, we recommend that structural fill be placed and be compacted to at least 95 percent of the MDD obtained in general accordance with the ASTM D 1557 test procedure. Structural fill placed within the Home Depot building area and within 2 feet of pavement subgrade elevation should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the same criterion. Structural fill placed more than 2 feet below pavement subgrade elevation should be compacted to at least 90 percent of the MDD obtained in accordance with ASTM D 1557. These recommendations apply to utility trench backfill in these areas as well. Structural fill should be placed in horizontal layers of an appropriate thickness to achieve the required compaction. The lift thickness will be a function of the type of soil being placed and the GeoEngineers 10 FileNo. 2401-119-00-1130\1015599 R'\ DRAFT compaction equipment being used. Each lift should be uniformly compacted to the required : compaction level before placing additional lifts of structural fill. We recommend that the appropriate lift thickness, the adequacy of subgrade preparation and structural fill compaction be evaluated during construction by a representative of GeoEngineers. For planning purposes, we recommend that each lift not exceed 8 inches in loose thickness. During structural fill placement • and compaction, a sufficient number of in-place density tests should be performed to verify that €= the required compaction is being achieved. Structural fill material should be free of debris, organic matter and deleterious material. We recommend that the maximum particle size be limited to about 3 inches. The suitability of material for use as structural fill will depend on the gradation and moisture content of the soil. As the amount of fines in the soil matrix increases, the soil becomes increasingly more sensitive to small changes moisture content and achieving the required compaction becomes more difficult or impossible. Suitability of On-Site Soil. The existing near-surface soils consist of gravel base course and coal,tailings. The base course material will be suitable for reuse as structural fill, provided it is separated from the coal tailings. We do not recommend using coal tailings as structural fill. The native alluvium consists primarily of fine-grained soils. The moisture in these soils are likely • welt above the optimum moisture content and will be difficult to use as structural fill, except when aerated in dry weather conditions. .J - Import Fill. We recommend that imported fill placed within the building and pavement area consist of material with less than 15 percent fmes. If the material is too wet to adequately compact when it is delivered to the site, it will be necessary to aerate it prior to placement. During wet weather or where structural fill is placed on a wet subgrade, we recommend that • import fill consist of sand and gravel with less than 5 percent fines. • Requirements for other import fill materials, such as capillary break and crushed base, are provided in other sections of this report. We recommend that samples of all import materials be submitted to GeoEngineers for approval prior to beginning the earthwork. Recycled Asphalt Concrete and PCC. The on-site concrete and asphalt concrete may be crushed and re-used on-site for structural fill. The gradation of the crushed recycled material should be consistent with the recommendations provided for imported structural fill materials. • Permanent Slopes We recommend that permanent cut and fill slopes be inclined no steeper than 2.5H:1 V in the coal tailings and existing loose fill soils along the east slope. Fill slopes should be adequately compacted on the slope face using a hoe pack or plate compactor. Alternatively, the fill embankment can be over-built and cut back to the design location. GeoEngineers 11 FileNo. 2401-119-00-1130\1015599 `, DRAFT • To reduce the potential for erosion, newly constructed slopes should be vegetated as soon as possible following completion of grading. Temporary erosion control measures such as jute fabric or a biodegradable matting should be used to protect unvegetated slopes from erosion and ravelling. Where coal tailings are encountered along the east slope, it may be necessary to place a layer of topsoil over the coal to promote vegetative growth. The requirements for topsoil should be evaluated by a landscape architect based on planned vegetation for the slopes. Temporary Slopes Temporary cut slopes should be inclined no steeper than 1.5H:1 V in the coal tailings and loose fill soils along the east slope. Surface loads should be kept a minimum distance of at least one half the height of the cut away from the top of the temporary slope. Temporary cut slopes and shoring must comply with the provisions of Title 296 WAC, Part N, "Excavation, Trenching 3 and Shoring." The contractor performing the earthwork should have the primary responsibility for establishing the safe inclination for temporary cut slopes, shoring requirements, protection of site personnel and protection of adjacent improvements. FOUNDATION SUPPORT General We have considered the use of both spread footings and pile foundations for support of the proposed building. The results of our field explorations, laboratory testing and engineering • analyses indicate that spread footings could experience very large total and differential settlements under the planned building loads. In addition, we estimate that seismic induced liquefaction may also results in up to 8 inches of settlement from the design earthquake. Therefore,we recommend that the proposed building be supported on pile foundations. The piles should penetrate into the competent sandstone bedrock encountered at depths ranging from about 10 to 85 feet below the existing ground surface. The estimated elevation of the competent sandstone bedrock surface is shown on Figure 3. We anticipate that 18-inch diameter augercast piles will be best suited for this project because of(1) cost, (2)the highly variable depth to competent sandstone, (3) layers of medium dense to very dense gravel within the alluvium that could create driving difficulties for driven pipe or 1 precast piles,and(4)the corrosion potential of the subsurface soils. Design and installation of the pile foundations must take into account the locations of the existing timber piles supporting the existing PSE buildings. The existing timber piles may interfere with planned augercast pile locations. The existing timber pile locations should be verified during demolition of the PSE buildings and the Home Depot foundation design and layout modified as required. G e o E n g i n e e r s 12 File No. 2401-119-00-1130\1015599 i`= DRAFT Axial Capacity Axial pile capacity in compression will be developed primarily from end bearing in the • competent sandstone bedrock. We recommend a downward allowable axial capacity of 100 tons 4.1 • per,pile for 18-inch-diameter augercast piles. This capacity is for piles that are installed to practical refusal into competent sandstone bedrock, as discussed under "Construction Considerations." We estimate that the piles will encounter practical refusal after penetrating about 1 to 3 feet into the competent sandstone bedrock. A contour map showing our interpretation of the elevation of the competent sandstone bedrock surface is presented in Figure 3. `a Uplift pile capacity will be dependant on several factors includingthe potential loss of strength of the overburden soils as a result of liquefaction during an earthquake, the thickness of 3 the overburden soils over the sandstone bedrock, and the embedment depth of the piles into the sandstone bedrock. The allowable uplift axial capacities for different pile tip elevations are 3 presented below. Pile Tip Elevation Allowable Uplift Capacity (feet) (tons) 10 to-25 2 -25 to-35 10 rR -35 to-45 20 -45 to-65 40 The allowable capacities presented above are for combined dead plus long term live loads and may be increased by one-third when considering design loads of short duration such as - seismic forces. The allowable capacities are based on the strength of the supporting soils for the penetrations indicated and include a factor of safety of at least 2. The capacities apply to single piles. If piles within groups are spaced at least three pile diameters on center, no reduction for pile group action need be made. The structural characteristics of pile materials and structural connections may impose l limitations on pile capacities and should be evaluated by the structural engineer. For example, steel reinforcing will be needed for augercast piles subjected to uplift. We recommend that a single reinforcing bar be installed the entire length of the augercast pile to develop the allowable uplift capacities presented above. Downdrag Pile downdrag forces develop when surrounding compressible soils settle relative to a pile, thus interacting with and adding load to the pile. We anticipate that only minor filling, if any, will be required for the project and that no other major sources of surface loading will result from project construction. Consequently, the potential for pile downdrag is expected to be minimal and downdrag need not be considered in the design. G e o E n g i n e e r s 13 FileNo. 2401-119-00-1I30\1015599 ' e ¢ , . ' a DRAFT Lateral Capacity Lateral foundation loads can be resisted by the lateral capacity of vertical piles and by the passive soil pressures developed adjacent to pile caps and structurally connected grade beams, if applicable. Because of the potential for separation to occur between the pile-supported foundation components and the underlying soil from liquefaction settlement, base friction on pile ' caps and grade beams should not be included when estimating lateral capacity. The magnitude of lateral loads and bending moments that develop in laterally loaded piles depends on thepile head deflection, pile stiffness surroundingsoil properties, and the degree of '4.1P � P P � � ` fixity at the pile cap. Allowable lateral load capacities and pile bending moments for both free g and fixed headed conditions were estimated using the COM 624 lateral pile capacity analysis program for 1/2-inch and 1-inch pile head deflections are presented below. 3 Pile Head Deflection Allowable Lateral Maximum Bending Pile Head Fixity (inches) Load Capacity(kips) Moment(kip-feet) Free headed 0.5 5 26 [1. 1 8 55 Fixed headed 0.5 14 90 1 22 165 These lateral capacities assume a center-to-center spacing of at least three pile diameters. For free headed pile conditions,the maximum bending moment will occur approximately 8 to 10 feet below the top of the pile and the bending moment will diminish with depth. We recommend that 4 reinforcing be extended from the top of the piles to a minimum depth of 28 feet below the top of m the piles for free headed pile conditions. For fixed headed pile conditions,the maximum moment occurs at the ground surface. We recommend that reinforcing extend from the top of the piles to a minimum depth of 31 feet below the top of the piles for piles designed for fixed headed conditions. Lateral loads and base shear forces transmitted to the building footings can also be resisted by passive resistance on the sides of the pile caps or other below-grade elements. The passive resistance magnitude depends on the soil conditions surrounding the below-grade elements. For elements surrounded by coal tailings, we recommend the passive pressure be estimated based on ]A an equivalent fluid density of 150 pcf(pounds per cubic foot). For elements surrounded by .i compacted structural fill, an equivalent fluid density of 300 pcf may be used for design. The structural fill should be compacted to at least 95 percent(ASTM D 1557)for a horizontal distance of at least two times the depth from the adjacent ground surface to the bottom of the element. The above values include a factor of safety of 1.5. Base friction on below-grade elements should be ignored since these will be pile supported and full contact with the underlying soil cannot be assured. • i G e o E n g i n e e r s 14 FileNo. 2401-119-00-1130\1015599 • DRAFT •n L Pile Settlement We estimate that settlement of the augercast pile foundations, designed and installed as recommended, will be less than 1/2 inch. Maximum differential settlement should be less than 1/4 inch,measured over approximately 50 feet. Construction Considerations . 'The augercast piles should be installed to practical refusal into competent (very dense) 9 sandstone bedrock using a continuous-flight, hollow-stem auger. For this pile type, practical : refusal should be defined as no advancement into the sandstone for two minutes of continuous drilling. As is common practice, the pile grout must be pumped under pressure through the hollow stem as the auger is withdrawn. Reinforcing steel for bending and uplift is placed in the fresh grout column immediately after withdrawal of the auger. We recommend that there be a waiting period of at least 8 hours between the installation of piles spaced closer than 8 feet, center-to-center. This waiting period is necessary to avoid disturbing the curing concrete in the previously cast pile. We recommend that a provision be made in the project plans and specifications to withdraw the auger from some of the piles after the bearing stratum has been encountered to confirm that sandstone bedrock is present at the pile tip. Specifically, we recommend that the auger be • withdrawn from 10 percent of the piles to make this determination. The piles from which the auger is withdrawn should be selected by the engineer during construction. should be noted that no direct information regarding the capacity of augercast piles (e.g., drivinItg resistance data) can be observed while this type of pile is being installed. Therefore, we recommend that a representative of GeoEngineers monitor pile installation operations. Our representative will observe the drilling operations, evaluate when bedrock has been penetrated, monitor grout injection procedures, record the volume of grout placed in each pile relative to the calculated volume of the hole,and evaluate the adequacy of individual pile installations. FLOOR SLABS We recommend that the floor slabs for the Home Depot building be pile supported due to anticipated total and differential settlement under static and seismic loading. The exposed slab subgrade should be prepared according to our recommendations in the Site Preparation and Earthwork section and newly placed structural fill should be placed and compacted in accordance with the recommendations in the same section. Since the slab will be pile-supported, the slab subgrade need only be prepared to facilitate construction. Therefore, no special requirements for soft soil removal and/or compaction below the slab are required other than to facilitate construction. We recommend that floor slabs be underlain by a layer of capillary break material at least 4 inches thick to reduce the potential for moisture migration into the slab. The methane gas layer (see Soil Gases)will serve as the capillary break layer. I GeoEngineers 15 File No. 2401-119-00-1130\1015599 r DRAFT R�5 A vapor retarder is not normally considered necessary within the Home Depot building area since no floor tiles or carpeting will be used in the building. However, we recommend that a vapor barrier be used for methane gas protection(see Soil Gases). Therefore,we recommend that a vapor barrier consisting of a layer of polyethylene sheeting overlain with at least 2 inches of fine to medium sand with less than 3 percent fines be placed immediately beneath the slab. We recommend that the subgrade for on-grade slabs for the truck loading area and the lumber storage area consist of at least 2 feet of structural fill compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the maximum dry density (ASTM D 1557). The modulus of subgrade reaction of 200 kips per square foot per foot (kcf) be used for design of on-grade slabs for the truck loading area and lumber storage area. LJ -PYLON SIGN AND LIGHT POLE FOUNDATIONS Pylon sign and light pole foundations for Home Depot developments are typically supported on drilled shaft foundations. Specific locations and load information for the pylon sign and light poles were not available for this draft report. Based on the subsurface conditions and previous recommendations that the building be pile supported on augercast piles,we anticipate that the pylon signs and light poles can also be supported on auger cast piles. Pile lengths should be evaluated when location and load information become available. RETAINING WALLS rQ Conventional Retaining Walls We recommend that walls for loading docks or other building walls that will serve as retaining walls be designed for lateral pressures based on an equivalent fluid density of 35 pcf provided that the walls will not be restrained against rotation when backfill is placed. If the walls will be restrained from rotation,we recommend using an equivalent fluid density of 55 pcf. These lateral soil pressures assume that the ground surface behind the wall is horizontal and does not include the effects of surcharges such as floor loads, traffic loads or other surface loading. Surcharge effects should be included as appropriate. Measures should be taken to prevent overcompaction of the backfill behind the wall. This can be done by placing the zone of backfill located within 5 feet of the wall in lifts not exceeding about 6 inches in loose thickness and compacting this zone with hand-operated equipment such as a vibrating plate compactor or jumping jack. The recommended equivalent fluid densities assume a free-draining condition behind the wall. This may be achieved by placing a zone of sand and gravel containing less than 5 percent fines at least 18 inches wide against the wall. Weep holes at about 4-foot centers at the base of the wall should be sufficient to drain water from exterior walls. Alternatively,perforated drainpipe could be embedded in the free-draining sand and gravel zone along the base of retaining walls to remove water that collects in this zone. A perforated pipe should be provided at the base of fill placed against the outside of the perimeter building walls. The drainpipe should be tightlined to the storm drainage system. I G e o E n g i n e e r s 16 File No. 2401-119-00-1130\1015599 ` ►. DRAFT EAST SLOPE RETAINING WALL zGeneral A cut up to 30-feet high is planned for the construction of the access route along the east and northeast sides of the Home Depot building. Based on the soils encountered in B-12 and TP-1 we anticipate that the cut will be primarily in loose fill soil and coal tailings. At the northeast corner of the wall, we anticipate that very dense sandstone up to about 10 feet thick will be encountered at the base of the cut. The contractor should be prepared for hard excavating conditions in the competent sandstone. We have evaluated the use of several different permanent wall types for this area. A soil nail wall, sheet pile wall, and a cast-in-place cantilever wall with a temporary excavation are not appropriate in these soil conditions and/or with the property line restrictions. Based on our evaluation,it is our opinion that a permanent soldier pile and tieback wall is the most appropriate wall type. However, even a tieback wall has significant design challenges with respect to the height of the wall and the proximity of the wall to the Benson Road South right-of-way. Typically, cantilever soldier pile walls are restricted to about 15 to 20 feet in height before anchors are needed for support. We anticipate the wall will be about 30 feet high at the northeast corner. Typically, a single row of permanent tiebacks would be used for a wall of this height. However, the right-of-way will likely restrict the use of permanent anchors in this area because anchors would extend beyond the property line in the vicinity of the northeast corner of the wall. The soldier piles would likely be quite large for a cantilever wall of this height. We anticipate that it will be necessary to core drill the sandstone to achieve proper pile embedment depths. It may be appropriate to regrade as much of the slope as possible below Benson Road to decrease the design height of the wall. However,the northeast corner of the wall may still be up to 25 to 30 feet high. Therefore, we anticipate that a portion of the wall may have to be constructed using temporary anchors to support the cut and then constructing a cantilevered concrete retaining wall that is integral with the soldier pile wall. Soldier Piles We recommend that the soldier pile wall be designed using the earth pressure diagrams presented in Figure 7. If the soldier pile wall is provided with a permanent drainage system behind the wall, then hydrostatic pressures do not need to be included in the wall design. Recommendations for permanent drainage are provided later in this section. We recommend that the embedded portion of the soldier piles for a cantilevered wall extend to the depth required for the design pressures or a minimum depth of 7 feet into competent(very dense) sandstone below the base of the excavation, whichever is greater. As previously discussed,we anticipate that the sandstone will be encountered about 5 to 10 feet above the base of the excavation in the northeast corner of the wall. We also expect that he sandstone surface will drop to the south and may be about 15 to 20 feet below the bottom of the excavation at the south end of the wall. r G e o En g i n e e rs 17 File No. 2401-119-00-1130\1015599 • DRAFT s The axial capacity of the soldier pile must be capable of resisting downward components of anchor loads and other vertical loads. We recommend using an allowable end-bearing value of 50 kips per square foot (ksf) for piles embedded in competent sandstone. The allowable end bearing value should be applied to the base area of the drilled hole into which the soldier pile is concreted. This value includes a factor of safety of at least 3. The allowable capacity may be increased by one-third for short-term loads,such as seismic forces. Seismic pressures should be included in design of the wall as it will be a permanent shoring system. Traffic surcharge from Benson Road should be included in the wall design,if needed. Casing may be required to install the soldier piles due to the presence of loose fill soils and coal tailings. Ground water may be encountered on the south end of the wall where the sandstone surface is expected 15 to 20 feet below the excavation bottom and saturated coal tailings and/or alluvium may be encountered above the sandstone in this area. The need for and the use of casing for installation of the soldier piles should be determined by the shoring contractor based on the subsurface conditions presented in this report. The contractor should be prepared to encounter sandstone fragments or metal or wood debris in the fill and/or coal tailings. Lagging We recommend that the lagging be designed for uniform pressures equal to one-half the active lateral pressure (Figure 7). This pressure reduction is based on a maximum center-to- center pile spacing of 8 feet. If a wider spacing is desired, we should be consulted for revised lagging pressures. Permanent lagging should be installed between the soldier piles to retain the soils where the wall,will be used as a permanent retaining structure. Permanent lagging may consist of timber or concrete. If timber is used, it must be adequately treated for protection against water and biodegradation. Tiebacks Tieback anchors should extend far enough behind the wall to develop anchorage beyond the "no-load"zone and within a stable soil mass. As a minimum,the anchors should extend at least 10 feet beyond the no-load zone into competent sandstone bedrock. The "no-load" zone includes the area where fill and coal tailings are present. Typically, anchors are inclined downward at 15 to 30 degrees below the horizontal. It may be necessary to incline permanent anchors more steeply to penetrate the sandstone where property line restrictions occur or where the sandstone is at lower elevations. We recommend a maximum anchor inclination of 45 degrees below the horizontal. Permanent tieback anchors should be double-corrosion protected. We recommend that the tieback anchors be designed and constructed in general accordance with the criteria presented in the following documents: 1. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, "Permanent Ground Anchors,"Report FHWA-DP-68-1R, 1984. GeoEngineers 18 File No. 2401-119-00-1130\1015599 DRAFT �'•. 2. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, "Tiebacks," Report • FHWA/RD-82/047, 1982. 3. Post Tensioning Institute, "Recommendations for Prestressed Rock.and Soil Anchors," 1995. Tieback anchors will develop anchorage in the competent sandstone. We recommend a • preliminary design adhesion between the anchor and soil of 5,750 psf for permanent and t temporary anchors. Higher adhesion values may be developed depending on the anchor installation technique. The contractor should be given the opportunity to use higher adhesion values by conducting performance tests prior to the start of the production shoring operation. A 30 percent increase in the recommended adhesion values can be used when considering seismic loads.. We recommend that spacing between tiebacks be at least 3 times the anchor hole diameter to reduce the potential for group interaction. Caving may occur in the fill and coal tailings located above the sandstone, during tieback installation. In addition, very hard drilling should be expected in the sandstone. Therefore, we anticipate that the tieback anchors be installed using casing. Grout should be placed by means of a tremie method if casing is used for tieback installations. The tieback anchors should be performance and proof tested generally as described in the above-referenced Post Tensioning Institute publication. We recommend that the performance tests be conducted to 200 percent of the design load. We recommend that at least two anchors be installed and performance tested prior to installing production anchors. The capacity of each production anchor should be proof tested by loading to 1.3 times the design load and holding the load for a minimum of 10 minutes as described in the above references. Drainage A suitable drainage system should be installed to prevent the buildup of hydrostatic ground water pressures behind soldier pile and lagging walls. Wick drains or strips of drainage material j should be installed behind the lagging. A strip drain at least 1-foot wide should be installed between each soldier pile and extend the entire height of the wall. The space behind the lagging should be filled with a sand/water slurry as soon as practical. This material will help reduce the risk of voids behind the wall and will provide additional drainage of potential ground water seepage. The material should be poorly graded with no particle larger than 'A inch, nor smaller than the No.40 sieve. We recommend that the strip drains be connected to a perforated drain installed along the base of the wall. LATERAL RESISTANCE The ability of soil to resist lateral loads is a function of the frictional resistance which can develop on the base of footings and slabs and the passive resistance which can develop on the face of below-grade elements of the structure as these elements tend to move into the soil. No base friction should be used under the slab, or pile caps under the building, as it will be pile-supported. The allowable passive resistance on the face of footings, grade beams or other embedded 3 - G e o E n g i n e e rs 19 File No. 2401-119-00-1130\1015599 I f ' ' ..- DRAFT 4 recommend that the asphalt concrete consist of Class A or B asphalt concrete mixed, placed and compacted in general accordance with Sections 5-04, 9-02 and applicable sections of 9-03 of the 1998 Washington Department of Transportation Standard Spec cations for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction. The crushed surfacing should conform to Section 9-03.9(3) of the 1998 WSDOT Specifications. Subbase materials should consist of sand or gravel with less than 5 percent . ; fines by weight for the material passing the 3/4-inch sieve. 1 The parking areas and access roads may experience some long-term settlement as the organic €, materials in the subsurface soils decompose and compress. PCC Pavements iiTruck loading docks, the lumber loading slab, the garden center rear gate slab and the slab directly in front of the overhead door pick-up area will be constructed using portland cement concrete(pcc). We recommend the following concrete slab thicknesses for these areas: • Truck loading dock-7 inches • Lumber loading slab-7 inches P • Garden center rear gate-6 inches • Front overhead door pick-up area-6 inches • Sidewalks-4 inches We did not encounter soil conditions that would require special slab reinforcement beyond that which would be used to control temperature cracking. We recommend that the base layer in these areas consist of at least 6 inches of densely compacted crushed surfacing conforming to Section 9- 03.9(3) of the 1998 WSDOT Standard Specifications. Where heavy truck traffic is expected, we recommend placing a 12-inch thick subbase layer consisting of sand and gravel with less than 5 percent fines. A geotextile separator (Mirafi 500X or equal) should be placed between the subbase layer and the subgrade soil. ENTRIES,SIDEWALKS AND UTILITIES iii Entries, sidewalks, and utilities on the outside of the structure may experience long-term settlement as the organic soils under the site decompose and compress. If finished grades vary by more than about 1 to 2 feet,long term settlement due to areal fills may also occur. Sidewalks along the building should be detached so that one side does not hang up and cause a sidewalk to tilt. Entries should be designed as a ramp with one end supported on the building and the other end supported on the ground to avoid the development of abrupt changes in grade. Utility lines that tie into the pile supported building should have flexible connections and be designed to accommodate differential settlement without damage. i .4 • G e o E n g i n e e rs 21 File No. 2401-119-00-1130\1015599 1 DRAFT GROUND WATER AND DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS Ground water may be encountered up to 2 feet below the existing site grades. It is possible that zones of perched ground water could develop above or in the coal tailings or silty layers in the shallow alluvial deposits across the site. We recommend that buried detention structures, utilities or other buried structures be designed assuming a ground water level about 2 feet below the existing ground surface. 'We recommend that pavement surfaces be sloped so that surface water flows away from the buildings. We also recommend that roof drains be collected in tightlines and routed into the storm drain system. SEISMIC DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS Seismicity- The site is located within the Puget Sound region which is seismically active. Seismicity in this region is attributed primarily to the interaction between the Pacific, Juan de Fuca and North American plates. The Juan de Fuca plate is subducting beneath the North American plate. It is thought that the resulting deformation and breakup of the Juan de Fuca plate might account for the E + deep focus earthquakes in the region. Hundreds of earthquakes have q been recorded in the Puget Sound area. In recent history,three of these earthquakes were large events: (1)in 1946, a Richter L: magnitude 7.2 earthquake occurred in the Vancouver Island,British Columbia area, (2) in 1949, a Richter magnitude 7.1 earthquake occurred in the Olympia area, and (3) in 1965, a Richter magnitude 6.5 earthquake occurred between Seattle and Tacoma. Research is presently underway regarding historical large magnitude subduction-related earthquake activity along the Washington and Oregon coasts. Geologists are reporting evidence that suggests several large magnitude earthquakes (Richter magnitude 8 to 9)have occurred in the last 1,500 years, the most recent of which occurred about 300 years ago. No earthquakes of this r-! magnitude have been documented during the recorded history of the Pacific Northwest. Local design practice in Puget Sound and local building codes have typically not included the possible effect of a very large subduction earthquake in the design of structures. UBC Design Considerations The project site is located within Seismic Risk Zone 3 as defined in the 1997 Edition of the Uniform Building Code (UBC). This area has a Seismic Zone Factor(Z) of 0.30. The UBC soil profile type is SF,which is a soil profile that requires site specific evaluation. Design Earthquake The 1997 edition of the UBC recommends that human occupancy buildings be designed for an earthquake with a 10 percent probability of exceedence in a 50-year period. The design earthquake event', which corresponds to this probability of exceedence is an earthquake with a Richter magnitude of 7.5 and a peak horizontal ground acceleration of 0.3g. I G e o E n g i n e e r s 22 File No. 2401-119-00-1130\1015599 i DRAFT • Liquefaction Potential and Settlement 'Liquefaction refers to a condition where vibration or shaking of the ground, usually from earthquake forces,results in development of excess pore pressures in saturated soils and subsequent loss!of strength in the deposit of soil so affected. Ground settlement, lateral spreading and/or sand boils may result from soil liquefaction. Structures supported on liquefied soils could suffer foundation settlement or lateral movement that could be severely damaging to the structures. In c: general, soils that are susceptible to liquefaction include loose to medium dense clean to silty sands that are below ground water. Such soil and ground water conditions are present at the site. 3 a The evaluation of liquefaction potential is complex and is dependent on numerous site parameters,including soil grain size,soil density,site geometry,static stresses,and the magnitude and ground acceleration of the design earthquake. We evaluated the liquefaction potential at this site by estimating the cyclic shear stress ratio which is the ratio of the cyclic shear stress induced by the design earthquake to the cyclic shear stress required to cause liquefaction. The results of our analysis indicates that some of the loose to medium dense sand layers below the ground water table have a high potential for liquefaction during the design earthquake. Based on our evaluation of liquefaction potential at this site, the same design earthquake as described above for human occupancy considerations is applicable. f 1 Our analyses indicate that there is a high potential for liquefaction occurring below the site if the site were subjected to the design earthquake event. Liquefaction could occur in the loose to medium dense sand below the site to depths of 40 feet bgs. • Ground settlement can occur as a consequence of liquefaction. The potential ground settlement caused by liquefaction will vary depending on the actual levels of ground shaking,the duration of shaking, and site-specific soil conditions. If the site were subjected to the design earthquake event,we estimate that ground surface settlements on the order of 4 to 8 inches could occur if all of the potentially liquefiable soils were to produce settlement. However, settlement is likely to occur in discontinuous pockets and layers in the soil profile. We also expect that differential settlements between adjacent columns or over a distance of 50 feet of continuous footing may be on the order of one half the total settlements,about 2 to 4 inches. Mitigation of Liquefaction Induced Settlement • As discussed previously, we recommend that the Home Depot building be supported on pile foundations. Support of the building slabs and columns on properly designed pile foundations will, • in our opinion, practically eliminate the effects of liquefaction-induced total and differential settlement on structural performance. FROST PENETRATION Some of the on-site soils are moderately susceptible to frost. The depth of frost penetration in this region is typically about 8 inches. The locally accepted design embedment depth for exterior footings is 18 inches and 12 inches for interior footings. Frost susceptibility for soils beneath slabs G e o n g i n e e r s 23 FileNo. 2401-119-00-1130\1015599 Fri.„ . I ' *+ DRAFT .3 • in heated buildings is expected to be minimal. Frost susceptibility pavement: g p p ty in areas is also expected to be minimal if prepared and drained as discussed. CORROSIVITY We completed three pH and resistivity tests on soil samples collected from the borings as an indicator of corrosivity. The test results are presented in Appendix B. Based on the test results and experience with other projects in the area, it is our opinion that the native alluvium is typically • mildly(inorganic soils)to highly(organic silt and peat)aggressive in supporting corrosion activity for unprotected steel. In our opinion, no special treatment need be made to concrete or concrete piling. The potential for moderate to severe corrosion should be considered in selection of buried, unprotected steel pipes or if steel piling is considered for foundation support. Coating or cathodic protection may be necessary for unprotected steel pipes or use of steel pipes with increased wall thickness or polyethylene encasement of steel pipes may be appropriate. SOIL GASES ,Soil gases can be a problem at sites where significant amounts of organic soils such as peat exist. The soils encountered at the site contain an appreciable amount of organic material. en Discontinuous peat and organic silt layers were encountered throughout the alluvium at the site. LA The decay of organic material may result in the formation of methane gas. There is also a potential for the coal tailings to produce gas. Adequate ventilation is the key to preventing the buildup of methane to potentially dangerous concentrations. Therefore, based on the soils E s encountered at the site,we recommend that confined spaces located below grade(e.g.vaults) and s the Home Depot building be ventilated naturally or mechanically to control potential accumulations of methane gas. For planning purposes it is our opinion that a passive gas ventilation system under the building would be adequate. This system could include a blanket of coarse sand or gravel with a J vapor barrier placed between the blanket and the floor slab. The sand or gravel blanket should be vented to the outside using perforated PVC pipe. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS 71 • The soils encountered on-site are not considered to be expansive or collapsible. J • Friction between the footings/slabs and the vapor retarder is not a factor since the building will be pile-supported. • There was no indication of sinkhole activity at the site. • Termite protection is not considered necessary. ary. LIMITATIONS We have prepared this report for use by Home Depot and members of the design team for use i in design of a portion of this project. The report is not intended for use by others and the information contained herein is not applicable to other sites. The data and report should be I G e o E n g i n e e r s 24 File No. 2401-119-00-1130\1015599 DRAFT f{ provided to prospective contractors for their bidding or estimating purposes, but our report, conclusions and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of the subsurface conditions. r The site development and building design were not complete at the time of this writing. When the design has been finalized,we recommend that the final design and specifications be reviewed by our firm to see that our recommendations have been interpreted and implemented as intended. • The scope of our services does not include services related to construction safety precautions and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods,techniques,sequences or procedures,except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. There are possible variations in subsurface conditions between the explorations and variations F,a are also possible over time. A contingency for unanticipated conditions should be included in the budget and schedule. Sufficient monitoring, testing and consultation by our firm should be provided during construction to confinn that the conditions encountered are consistent with those indicated by the explorations,to provide recommendations for design changes should the conditions revealed during the work differ from those anticipated, and to evaluate whether or not earthwork and foundation installation activities comply with contract plans and specifications. 1 P Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical practices in this area at the time the report was prepared. No warranty or other conditions,express or implied,should be understood. 4 +► We appreciate the opportunity to provide geotechnical engineering services to you on this project. If there are any questions concerning the report or if we can provide additional services, please contact us. Respectfully submitted, GeoEngineers,Inc. I Robert C.Metcalfe,P.E. Geotechnical Engineer e i Mary S.Rutherford,P.E. Principal RCM:MSR:pIg p:\00\finals\240I 11900rep.doc • G e o E n g i n e e r s 25 File No. 2401-119-00-1130\1015599 • , - • RCM:HLA 2401-119-00 10/07/99 • . . • ,...mlim .. "*."'"""=r r,'"- :: l''''' ''''"• 40 — . a) .ttEk",",, '. .. ; • '' • • • • c'' - '11.461 -'• 11 IRV ,,, ' '.""--.4.P.1 E,, ElpEy.tAv, 7,* ' ',is,- '4 II • ; VI''"0 yi 4-..: z...*,':•,,•••2, ,„..• • . ..j g :.;0;41 S3H1 • ' z . 4 ilatil •--Ai S f - a ,,,63.-ilik„..*.w..•.."6.314- .. . 0:.• . vs 1. . •. c a •:-. . .,0"IC14)4ki tsE--,,,,sii .,ceP u, I;# $ ..Z; m c s•.,71.-.1%.4e.t.',"&t. ••4,••:41, .. ...„,,r • c,•t ,,-P I 2-3 r Fl c) • • :- '-• .;:•..• - .....W.- ••,•:•'..g .,. ,- ...g.., POWELL: V SW ,ip l• • c'' S1i,3 ite, , .. x 1 3 - .•• .3,3 .- • ':41'-• ; . • . .'':,:..st. '. ••• '. !3=33 '.. : 114,11.334.3 •:3.,... .4.,.k,. '.....:.:•:t>,•..* .3'i• • -‘”,•'•'+'',,,,Sli1::.,,:i3* ;I.-3 . .,,,..A.1 • .:.•3 .3 •••• . •i V -',...... gs CD ...-.-- .i,„,,,,,L,,,,w•,. .:,..:,...• :P-,g,t,,• .,, • - % ' •' •T.• • - • 0- -- '-'- 1 V THOMAS' V S71100 . v ( . V 8 v, isl I72-iip•:;.7 ' o m'' ...;•••67... X.T1',1' 'X•'..• .;.',U• • :! rt, pot RA''NO. • NIT.P14-Tiii t+.,113-'‘6-:.;•.--',-3-"•. • 7ifk-77....7..77.• " ..". Zik .7.-#fi.t.? ..43;:_i.:4v s ..__.84E11 AV"S j••• I # k 0 -0 4,,,,,..".. •• 1 :.1,,;•: • •i .••.•. of ,.; ' AV 11 GI SENEcA_ 4 , al -,- -1',J V-__F! "0:08,11_ i;.„I_ _ _ • `;k1.14:eq-7.,:i•i•lyv,-, t. . ' -,1-.•• , •.: .,• •s . AV SW ..=r-4.al -41*, , —c—,....v`A•-s7:`,Av4—`:"•.:::-.-_,:.R.'s8,,-,..1,.,..,, _0. •••., „..,,,,„,,,,,,„,,,...„.„. . • • _._•._._:_,,..„,.,.. ,.._... ilallaildl" 'Av . - --.'•:4 sW • •••Ii‘;•••:- .: ,.• *And.A - illb ... .....,4,!1.r., ...: - •,,,..‘i; •„...... ,. ......• ,-• :.. 4.: .:.:I. 70""."7111iitk,; ..,,, Fzenna. cairs,o, . L ND 00 til - o El) ''','. '.•:.::"••'.. .....i'• . :t--40,,,,,- '. ' .,:' ::••....... •LE.: -I ,• AV SW ,„.... 10 -i U3 c•'','..4.. !'::''..:•..,„.: ;kl..V g',i'':•'.... :;:k.,;::.::a.'':.. ':'‘.:.-is .sl....,. o' , ., 'Ai 4 -- .g, a•*. S. • a P tig P AY08611JEAY ID Pst‘kii 1 ;tit kine 0 -1 C '..'.;.:.4..,,:::: :...4,'......' '1.'''.h•ii 4.• •:.•;•'.....:..;: 4. '...: T•;."!...,4 s.,, ,,,.... ...,-....' ,, .VALL ,,..1.,, ::-.•-•'•:.:::.:'" :- 'l'•'•':''..Agi• 1110 .i.• 4 i A = 0 ii a S VRARDIE 113II"MtIr ' 1/16* AtAMill:/' - 4 AVM -a-4 rts ...c....)•,,,,,,:5..i.;...„4„,„1,1:.„. • .., ,_•_- • _,....-6 -••• ::1".;?c,"',N.;.;',',..". •" Notiii R• AV CD 0 ,„- ...., .---------7-:;.,-1,1 i, .kr.--7,,,, 4...? -.Z.,77,•;."oft, r.,,,,is Ir.!:... - .. I a 1 AV ;u1 • 1.3 acrah'41 NI I°\ - C4 -1 = 0 „,..0 ..,3'.,..,.,,33. -, •,1,33...,;-.1,..)..,',•:. ,13- 3....,$3,:', . .."4011: ""•3-P•'''* 3 0 0 ......I.:pip...1i.',...,, ''-IIII'Sr;•:+,,•:16 a ;'5.;,i...., •....3.•:,,;,4• b_.....0 . , 1.4'.1.,;•NE.•••• I • 0:•."11111101Pglalll NW P ----' 57: Mpg --- ••••01.1.10.111111111 K " ?A4,. ..&.',..,: •E",.,EI 230, ,7,.•1'0. • .-.',..-4,- S_;.,1:001 , ..„,,,,,. .. : .. oo ._,:___!..4........quAtill •••*. Al .--1''3 •-< > - - ... --"El--.7- 11=U12431E•13....IL" '.3; 8— i ul . ,...r.,.,,,,,,-J.i: ••.•;::,•i'••Ai'..4.,'4 ''';14509 it,..: . .•• ;E: * '',- "--9-171• \.,,_ac.83 it 1 -4 A- .. ---5,;ireir—• -a F." . _• •• 4,3 1014 .. a co ;...ry• ,:, i.,,,,f.;..1 s....... '• !,.,..:.. .,;,.., .,,.,..i Mill AV.,:'S•iismix ez-__:.,.e'2 .. \ ,,, :4 SO•.#4,'Ai3r.'•!* .. ', Frs)1!., ' f4tir -w•,,, rirriVi. "' ;"''.".,9'i!,..! • kii vim, ‘111 Illtial LOGAN V ' •---.ici a EE P. 7:3 cn • ,.....4'41.4••-.4. 4.'•'• ..:-.T.'•,n :. i •t•ED... t ,... o ;.„•'•.1•1.1:.,,islreri -.-1: 4•;! ; \ • WI In!! lc"' 'f•r) ................... , ._. n ..,,.1.4e.,::.e.,>. 4...7,i.':p,„7:1 o•.;:.:•;-. - is -.i- :... •41 ; ,,k141;.; • V - ,i z -7,• ' i°e=44, gli " . , , _solvemplainis..,r1 Ay! • s ,:.• yE,, i,, 3- n (D > m EV er4' .'•. 4;'... .. ''01.'-'.:•.••4.. .;. .'1,-7 .',",i,,,;,L.: s 4 2•••••-it.,Y:i";..1.?, :,.i...:,...,..T.; ,,-c' "- a:alrji .'. ::-'."":"......- --•.• -$,••• a.n.. ,,,,..,„).WISKILII AY ,,;t111111.113 0 V '..• P2V4WEignell N , > 0 , , ,T,:..i. ' .. .• ,,,, „ .. LiT T 5 ,..,•,,;(,"...- ,,a, . 1432• 1114221 -,..04r.4„...1.; -.,i'. ;•4:karn......iiiirELLs.....till;11 „ 7'' 01.fferiett -.--.. . ,0 •,...• r-r•• , .. . .. . .. ,. .„,,, ••.:•,•.ros •i.\.. -r1 ,- 'X .• • 31,*.• ;.,4,0 1'.*:,34''+:•;,- +' 3-.,..:'..3%, -• • ••I3•.;•..' -. -.. , . ... . ,... , ,...:,.... . ,.. ..... ..,::,t,. -,.....,.- ;,,,nv•:, - ------,..._ -:'.4--,Trjradh, AV silavidoll --- - pEiLy wrigindE CD =. M • • ' -• ."'.(-.ql ; .";C:',,!. ..Or. ...' . he•''''.".•'..'' ...'''.` '•,"".....:"A• EDAR • Magi 1 Aii\• •• • ., 1mM-ern '. .sf•CEDAR:AV.-.4 ,„,..,,j.f.:z.-.'• . .' ,(\l': . • .y•.• '. :•-i,r,-,•::,,.„,„„, . .....\: . = (0 .7, -r- • -1 . ...- „8 •I •;,•-•••:•.• pr.!T.$71.3,...73 .1'''.."-'f.T.''..:M•.. 11111110W4delih N7e.i 3.... 31E 5001.1- 1---•- III!' .3';1 WINIMI 2 .73"-0 AV SE ' .1^1 E:.:'• .1 "."....-4'...;:•Y••< 7166130 • T GRAN ''' 4..,,,, • • • Qat-1-- i '''HIGIE '• Av. gS.' ..:!'• i':4(il?,•:••••1-• •71/4 •\ ' AVG.:,\\a N " Iran 400 -- - •El • ,•,' ••A'SE-e„....,'!..:,E ..!.. -ED w 0 • M.! :','.,..-. 0 ,1' :LI.•*.V '..,=•••;:.: ,r. 91 o ",.v. ••.'.i.i•.:.• 1,..,-4.,'..E4,..".,' •.,..'!-q.,-' n',..•:•.',...- ••-.‘ - ,3..•00i1ES AV S 'It'' .' e ••!.,,,k.,,,I..,c,;./ ......;:• ,..k....-4... • i-"4111*,44,,,,,Lik ..illgimmill 0 • 34' -4;'gi:". :•'.';',,11:74;•:\7.!•. °!-","•( ' . ",: -;;;.,''.''' .•'' •' ,,.4:.41-tEt. ,a.e. " En • .- ' .1.::. ,.;'."''. • .7'.:•-:.!/' '''':- N.., glIFM' 4 8 -8 — . s< .....• 1,..: ,•,.-A,• -7.. '...- q:' '........ • .. -.. • ; :• • • -2, .:, , " .-,..• , • '''':'-',•i. :NI i 1,.;iii415'4s,pe,k -n 0 ° zi• •-•f• ... •-• ow, • • • • •ry • .. ?,.. ,.,1.!4-, . :=-4 -, ..A.4.., . i.,,,i, ,,, ,. 16.2, ., y 109TH 1AV SE A It:. „•' ', .•slim.;. c•:=0 •• ••:i:•••••• - '. R .. .1...4! :: --alko'h 0 Z c 7.- A '0, .-. $4.;I.'-0.:"•2:‘El ''...' ,c,.-11':.F,FT„SI: ,'.. ••.''. ,. ..',,,:';;..?,;.1," . . V -. -.ik,:-.0,4r.,..:,, 4'ii.4,.., •,'''''I-, g,'-'-..41e _. . (r., ,I. i „Li.• P VA.:.-111V' ball:,C22,.•,::•.:.,.m...•,.. ... ,,...•.;.:",. ... ,,,,,,... .., '_:,;•(....-.;,,,.t.t,,,i-ii. i •,-......- .....4 iS111•01::;qh,_, ,.. • „...1,71A,. -,3,,......,-;,,..;•;;,...t.;::.: C -4 0 Q. 4 • (.:::,_rza,,,,,,Ly, tx‘T.AT.r.,A,,,.,,,i• .,_... EREY 0R NE ,All,,,a••••fil\....„ca..•. • Xi .< 0 cr 11TH t.' AV SE •• , .., , -"- .141,..ic; 'el• 'Atimpti''r!.:,7 i'•-•'• ••• . . 'ssc.:- • .r.,...v,i7.6,,,..::::',,-+•;:•••'104. , i•i!, •. .,. _WIAIli smii ... elk:\ m -, .< •... - • • t-, Iillt .. I NE ••,:...,„, if M -4 —I 1 • , ,.,:-.41rallN.4441),,Ntei - . ...........‘,,.. . .,e., r, ,,,-,-,,t,„?..p.s,...:A_...:_..;;., L., - I -..,,,..AV Ve: :.',.-.... 0. ' ...... . . s. -% .Y./.0), .,• 1-..----- • JC0 .6i,..IDE C:r.SE. :.,/.!'....,..,.. ,.. ,I,',,; ,40 ,4.;:kl..4...r .4,eq: .., 'I'S? . . . , ' BRONSON Tql.s.7...."--------------- . > E 6 AV SE 11314,AV SE 1 kit,';:•'.-••••• '114.4 a4 000 z4. -y 4. ., % #e. k. -e,-,V I )3 ''';.• % 0 73 : 1 ,141 , vr \ v4 -A ELAN -4 " > VI , 114TH AV SE '. 4.• • • Ci...•.: i.91)‘" 0/: . .. '. ‘''' '''1) .'U 67,71),,' ' .,s. • - . • A. , 4,,.. e t Vill; f..5 NI NI * I I5TH AV SE,';,' 4 - i:•4 4 _ :•-• ...0 , 1,..,,.'....' ' xa- ..• .., 'Cele; ',N rim 7-1: co 4'' SE 'g 4 I .. t: 4.:. 1 1. . s: 4c.. . ,,: ,: r illizci ,•0%, ' ••, ' ' . 7 7- Ap AV ' a • ..' v.....: . St 'AV • M 0 R •, ..':'.. 411.41, '4 ', DMONOS .—AV NE i' 1 c 0 • 6800 ,.,... v. A • 9, ••••rf (i) 1168i Pl...i,:ts.(41 "` 1 1.; 00 ,i,u. AV SE '..4,,yri. -fe•4#. .•:-• . ..:..• • ,,,,.a,t, . -,, E r„.0 ,.,61 — .47 -.., b ....tn. .. 0'. Q ,:s••0 ' .: .. ..1,0441/* ' • PP- .. 1 " a a ... i--• 1 ,?, 41 CD K ,... V;rail .--. G. „ °4•V,1,1 4.0,• ,,,,,ti.,, :, . tr,9-itt_4; , _, > _ . ..,,..v ,,, m\c,.,...4, 4,. , v., Atilik,o.R.,.,•,,-.• -;061'..!_to-to, ‘ \''fk Y;', - „iv`>'11; 3 "u A.-÷' %'•••41f.• .,,,:!...qs,ret,4 r • Vol , --, '\---- 11•::..41_., , — u) 4.0 =A rws.,,,s 1•I. ER. • e.' 4 •")•WI:z.. )r pr. -,› „, , - ..:4. .. .,..„,„„ . 0.. a ......---z---)ft---- • ' ", •....is2T..........__, AV .§Estlir,;*, •s ' 't 4,)••• ...3.1' . if-,,....,..,..,.. .. ,.. ...-- HARRINGID V NV 1 Al' .. „Ai ,4,,,„„,,,..„,„,,- u.s2...„, , ,s,..,4., ,4c,,,,,,... •4.„, 1,,,1 .----......-.. ..,.r?-,',,..!,:•,:;-„1,...b,,,,, „.• • ,„ . i,...rt. Pal AV A Nr . ..., . . . ., , - -., .—. •• •- . ..• ..... ...• .. ....• ••. . ••.•..,..•.•. •• •. . .:••... • • ... . . . • -- --- , ' • 341.1,, . _ ---- i.ti.- •. • .... •••■ ................ _ . •1• •N. •••.... .... .-,..„... . ........,.......... fil . ......., -, -.., - -.... ----.. , • , --•,,... RETAIKNO ' •... •• 3.• .- WALL. 4'4: B-12'---..:*:-N . • . ..., : • 7.r. 1 • • ' • i ••• ..... ... ss '....\ I itir • ... . t\ : ; : 1 i : • 1;4 7.."• -, RENTON g -, ': ,'-''i?•.?..,-- •Th13-1 '• )1< . N CITY • ''s ."-•:R.'•.-:§X. ' N !--- HALL +B-1 ,........:„.... ......\:::...... ,.;) ----- ,..../ .1.1::7:t1:.. .. /4_ ,.. NI...-. , • •-•;e:s t..: t..t • / r-, ----- 1, -- '''...C -, ' \ .• / ----1\ . ::::::... ... I + -5 „A. B-2 .. ilair4fyit, (...tr:1\ PROOOrD- BUILDING / \\/, I 1 .: 1 N • +B-8 I+ ---............-\..,,,,,,....... 1-...‹.\\ U • • rr- • -1 -\\ \-\, • •; • •••=... 4tll J \ I 446-4&i. • ,. , i I I ! ‘4r : 1 .4 / , ' • A il 1 1 \\ *‘4V412/06b,„, \.‘ ......... . ---„,i. I I I • . - 0,... .... • .. . _ , r--I — L I I rik.W.cria' \\I:, \ . 1 / lia/- -.4.... • `WA, I "'-..,,,,i I \\ I I . _ I \ ,...... . =... Ns, _ • --=.:..-. • •-•+_ ' B-3 . fi • Fra! \\ I I ::................ ................s....„.s..........s.s I \ • • \,ZC....Y BUILDING • /',..u._. ... '—t ...:..--, t 1 711 I I 1 .• 11 •,. ...... <-. - ,-- i 1 I / • •••. 1 1 J \ / I I /..•.• ii 1 . 1 i 1 / 444, . •.:.. . 1 <,. .1 , :.,.... 1 I I • 6 ,I0 \,.:,........::::::,-.,\- , 7,...,7:..7..: ,. . ___\' 4p4 1 . s(114,4\.... i IA \) (N WILLIAMSAVE ;;;42!" . . ---.' -- --- *04.:- —.-4--- ..--,_ ` ' , , A ..4 , ______ ,es,;\ •e? .; ', . ,•-•ti-s-:;:,_ . ---..: .4.:,. . J ''':, ,.7s:.\.- " 1._iir i 1 .1...1.• . ••••• ,j....k. . N ,7......::' '. . /-::••••..: , . . . .• ... A I I • • 1.4-N N NN B-19 1 1 .. '.•••.•.' . 1 , . • • • • • . • • • • \ X\ • • 3 . ...,. \.:, ....,...„..„.4> „.,....... ,\x lr...---,` 4j,',, \ r.:. ..s.' ....ssX:„\Val. / II ,• • • ,....). It \'•••• ,:.x. t 1 . • . • , — . . • N. N\ \s. - l 1 •. -'.1•,...,4';•.-,,,,. \ \ .......::>, / 1---1 . ..,,,,. , . •....`",,,.*:* ' 1"-• ‘4: \• ' Ef.'...1C1\\—'' VA 1 0 . .// / . .. , i4....Li;1- I 1 . 1, • •.• 1 0%tst•P.D. ''. s. 1 • • • • • • • . .., • r'..........1::***4 • • \• IN. ••••••••••••••\:•• ' . • I I • A •••••••/X•••••\: r4, „ --- Li . f, ...,... :\ 4i• . .,..._.. . . . . -- - - - EXPLANATION ..,... 1 r.ss a : 4°- : ..,L\ - \\•••••'-'is - - k. -- ----------'- ;:"--a16.-..-.11 —.------:------------=---._.____----------------— --------._.___________------- \ ss..4E, • /=-- :.,., ,... la N • \ ...„.-:::,— ,t,,,— ., , — , E-, B-1 -# BORING • .4- 0 - / --", ...-•-•‘• \ ••';;;:k;••--..- --- , '...-------. V•:„.:1,.:.4--. ;,s. -•••----''-• %.4- 1,,,,../'-: ---- r------------- — -------- ---- — - N • 0 . . < ,-4 0 SCALE IN FEET ../ •.• ."V-.1------ l'• cy) .., ...--. ,' •" -, — ZS \ Reference: Drawing entitled "Preliminary Site Plan of The Home Depot at Grady Way & Talbot -; .4- • . N • / Road, Renton, WA" by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated 09/08/99.. .--- • '.I --\4: ;i 4,r‘V'' ...,. i •• Notes: 1. The locations of all features shown are approximate. ,.,.e.,..A. SITE PLAN • A r 2. Boring locations not surveyed. . ,A Geo .'". --- Engineers • Nik • - FIGURE 2 . . . . . • - --- _ • I N W . . . • • _ — ..fl ' '. 1 • •:•;.:1' . • Ell• • / , ....w•WW••••""'.'.".''''''...'.'" ...,... .............., ••••••• w•••••••••• ...........•'.. \ \ \ \ ...7'''•: .,...••••• •••• ••••• •.1......11, .. ... . • ••••••••••..... o'.....'.WP............e... ........ \ \ \ " .r .: ....•••••••• •••• .....••• ..........••••••••• .. .....•••• \ ' \ \ 0. I''' I". 1 1 \ •,''.. \ > I''. \ • /'... I I I \ \ •N '''. • •• . 77,-*- ...-IRANSFORMER, • / -- .„,„--- PROPANE AND . 1 1 / /\ \ GENERATOR ENCL . / .,' \ „ -\ ft I I \ . . „-- --- ,--' /..•. . :- 2 % ::..: -... - - N A .). ..-- - ----.,-- • • -\-\. •\- 1$0 t?-C .6> ' :;::..<1:.*-::: . -;;-.;'..-:,---':-.:..:-•--- i..•.,•:.-::,:-,..-._:• -:-- - . - E]i.-..-.-;V ' . 0 9rr- . Y / u----- ....i _ „.. • / / - ENCLOSURE ... -PRO-PO- SED B-U---LDING' -\- ./ / 6 'r „ : - - . - / - 9 ' - - . / - L •..90' CLR. j, • ..---- 0 - 0 5% P / e.\„ / - 0 ,./ 'Z- -0' ' 1* \ 6 / .../' . / / / ---- ...----- ------ -/' .44,oc2t. c31r477------W ..----.-----. ........--•-- • -•c_3 -..,., •., so n ---"*". 'Nl'is‘t. 4,A• .0 / ..----" ..,.....„--- ...----- — ..- _ _ _ . . :. -" L.; ... / .„,...-- .........- -----• °N- / / • .c, . \ .. • • . : ., . .--- -- _ -- ..--- --..... IFF I -Li !--7 .--- Z zB-9+ .. 7 / ---- .-- _16 ":.:1- ---"--****--- ...---.' ....---- --........,m........ •.,,-. .,---""-- ----- - V ., . 0 tu cr) 61 6.< • - . 5:::z , __ . • 1--- T ,•••""... :I a_ .•••••••. —. ./'''' .......••••• .....-••••• +B-7 ---- .....7 ---- gz0343g - 6 — /'/ ... - -* .... ......../ 14 •4: -......g 1"A ... 5 .---- rl — __ - ----• .• Z V \- .4; . 7 0 3 • •.: • • .--- -- / ." .4° ..------- ---- ..---- Li o, ../ ...-- ---... ,,,, .., . ----- __ .--- 7 --.... i .4- ----- — — — — , . .------' ----- 4 . • . ....---- ..------ ---- , ---- 0 --____ 82'-5" -....... / i'--- L • 35 Fl .., o - - ./. • - CANOPY ENTRY il 1.4 jp. .51 .....--- , _458737.3_ _____ _____. , -----* fa ---- ,,. -.,..._..L....--•••••-""" 4 r ...- • i _ ....65A'.._____ - • _ __ ..---- - ..------ [ B-11 _ I ---- —.4— ii 0 . /.../„.. ./.. . „BO . ..''.:/_.1./a1.1Z2.z.z..z.z.z.z.z.zz.z.firdi CUSTOMEff PICK-UP LANE / )X- / , PAR')CPPLS ELDI N ES ) c : , -70-- / —_.... / / 11111% . 00 C 03 C ) .r1 /iiAvf/ ( ) / A ) c (,L) i •: 541 s,N1/4 . _ i .6 .ezz:.. ,.zzet I I cv 1::=: ) t ...go. ( Q. ;A -6 *0 -- 0 60 120 ----‘,--0 0 ,.Ou if• .'\ I 1 . ' .. .4, 1 _.... ...... c.) ......, ...- SCALE- IN FEET ci) - EXPLANATION: 5 • •4- B-1 -4;4-- BORING CNI Notes: 1. The locations of all features shown are approximate. Reference: Drawing entitled "Preliminary Site -Plan of The Home Depot at Grady Way & Talbot ..--- fi: 2. Borings not surveyed. Approximate ground surface TP-1 41- TEST PIT Road, Renton, WA" by Barghausen, Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated 09/08/99. - : elevations used to generate bedrock elevations taken ........, j 5 from the preliminary drawing "ALTA/ACSM Land Title Al _ I A' C-ROSS SECTION ....,,,-- BEDROCK CONTOUR MAP = Survey, Renton, Washington by Barghausen Consulting _f5-____ _ APPROXIMATE ELEVATION (FEET) N.,-:\ :--- ' Engineers, Inc., dated 09/15/99. OF COMPETENT SANDSTONE Geo . -- -.-:- Engineers FIGURE 3 fY , H PROPOSED BUILDING AREA si { W Z 0 M W AZ cn 46O T60Z t� ,Y CM+• N 4-a) co 4- co 46 .� 6 _ Fill . o 30 - .- �' m Very soft to medium stiff coal and ry- 7--Coal - 30 m - Existing ground surface m very loose to loose silty fine sand 50/1 -Coal (coal tailings) „ `� ¢—__t,L'� 6- Coal ,� _• 550/4 - --7- 2- - 5S 4" R 4_6- SP SP 1_-ML_ • �-' /1 y 2-. --- z 2 SM 4 SP-SM 1- SM 0 9 -"- -PT Very loose to dense silty sand, sand and gravel 2- SM/MI_ 1- ` Sandstcne -iii 0 19- with layers of very soft to medium stiff silt, 9 ---------PT ?50/3"i (bedrock) 50- GP organic silt, clay and peat. (alluvium) 6 _-__ ' /. 50/4"- 50/4"3 6t?-• 9 - 50/5" P ' /35-_____-- . 65 SP - 50/5"- -30 - 33- _ ?� 9 - 50/6"= - -30 o IA 41_-GP_ / L 5- C. 4 - CL — �.?� — s O / 28 ? •• 1 - -60 Weathered sandstone - —' Sandstone o (bedrock) 3 0 ci rn -90 - - -90 ' O _ - d- N 0 U •- O d N a_ - EXPLANATION: m HORIZONTAL & VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 30' . Boring ....... Notes: 1. The subsurface conditions shown are based on interpolation between • CROSS SECTION A-A' widely spaced explorations and should be considered approximate; 7- Blow Count II I . N actual subsurface conditions may vary from those shown. "?. MIIP - Geo - - Engineers 2. Refer to Figure 3 for location of Section A-A'. - • FIGURE 4 o r.. -- - - - • r 1"" PROPOSED BUILDING AREA i'd Bcif Z B' WEST w u) EAST • 60 - Z ,t - 60 M r N a) V.. N �. soft o f l and very loosettonloosemsiltyffineasand 30 - (coal tailings) - ni: - 30 .i ' 0 r' cp Existing ground surface — 4= Coal _'�s_ - 1-- -PT ---- _ )__-__=c-s _ Very loose to dense silty sand, sand and gravel with 6,, SM - 0 14- 2 SM layers of very soft to medium stiff silt, organic silt, —,� 0 a� s= 2- clay and peat. (alluvium) 6- 0 2_ 6_ 50/2"=- 2 - Z w SM__ 3-_-- • o 25 i_isP-_ 85/6" - GW • Q 37- 50/5"- Sandstone - -30 - i9- GP 4 -CH (bedrock) - -30 J 24 --- - rn 12 sox. '50/5"_r s- -71 to 21- r_ • O 15- i� 12_ -60 - 35>� - -60 r� 83/10'- 50/4' i 81n._ Weathered sandstone 9---- / • �• 75/3'-• Sandstone y (bedrock) 0 .,-J o -90 - • - -90 0 --, a) ,• o - - - d- N - - - Q 0 rn o ' d- N 0_ EXPLANATION: m HORIZONTAL & VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 30' Boring Notes: 1. The subsurface conditions shown are based on interpolation between B-B' widely spaced explorations and should be considered approximate; 7- Blow Count { ,\ CROSS SECTION >- actual subsurface conditions may vary from those shown. �- -'`" Geo Engineers 2. Refer to Figure 3 for location of Section B-B'. FIGURE 5 0 rr -- -- -- ---------- �- H PROPOSED BUILDING AREA -I WEST _ z v�i EAST 60 - N 60 • N via) a)1-5 ta 4-, a) Very soft to medium stiff coal and o very loose to loose silty fine sand 30 - c0' co(coal tailings) d 30 m r-. — Existing ground surface m m 2- Coal 1- _ 2 _Coal _ • 190 -SW 2 SM,SP-SM 2 ML/PT • ML 0 - 11----- 3 s_- P 2 SP 0 a) Very loose to dense silty sand, sand and gravel with 2---=OL _SP-SM 12 - SM/SP-SM layers of very soft to medium stiff silt, organic silt, 8- S_P_-SM 6 9 28 -z 15-___ clay and peat (alluvium) 4---OL 18 ML 3" , `` 26- ^SP/SP-SM 55R6.- GP —5f)/2"34 l -30 - 32 =GP SP 22- _S_P ,? Sandstone -30 ' t.Lia, 11-` PT 15 sP L (bedrock) 12- ML/ML-CL 17-�'-SM— u' S s-�� �50/6 o --- SP 50/2 - '� 70/4 • -60 - 26 _ -� -60 1_1 13 SM Sandstone 50/5"--- (bedrock) • n - i Li 0 . 0 -90 - -90 -- Lii a) 0 N / 0 , 4.1 0 a) O - N a_ - EXPLANATION: m HORIZONTAL & VERTICAL SCALE: 19 = 30' Boring _ 0 Notes: 1. The subsurface conditions shown are based on interpolation between CROSS SECTION C-C' widely spaced explorations and should be considered approximate; 7- Blow Count �;. actual subsurface conditions may vary from those shown. Geoff Engineers FIGURE 8 5 2. Refer to Figure 3 for location of Section C-C'. o- I ° , I Zr< 11 Loose Coal Tailings and Fill t i f.'a _y .r ea H, -... 3 , .... _. ... / \` �"45H, 16H, Sandstone 1 Base of Excavation i Active �J 1' ��� Pressure Seismic i (psf) Pressure ` (psf) Sandstone ..... ["'" � _5,000 ---..— Passive Pressure (psf) a) a) in o Notes: 1. Earth pressure coefficients are given in terms of equivalent fluid pressures. 2. Passive pressures are assumed to act over 2 times the soldier pile diameter or pile spacing, whichever is less. o 3. Active pressures are assumed to act over pile m NOT TO SCALE spacing above base of excavation and over the pile diameter below base of excavation. 4. Passive pressures do not include a Factor of Safety- w I— cc A Factor of Safety of at least 1.5 should be included p in the design. Q 5. Active pressure does not include traffic or equipment surcharge on top of backslope or from Benson Road South. I, 6. Elevation of the sandstone will vary along wall jo alignment. If fill or coal tailings are present below the base of the excavation, no passive resistance a should be considered between the base of the excavation and the top of the sandstone. Visit I EARTH PRESSURE DIAGRAMIEBACKS ' { CANTILEVER OR SINGLE ROW OF T ' Geo��Engineers 3H:IV SLOPE U cc FIGURE 7 X a. • ---1 DRAFT ft APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATIONS Subsurface conditions at the site were explored during the period of September 17 to September 27, 1999. The locations of the explorations were taped from existing building corners t or fences. The approximate locations of the explorations are shown on Figures 2 and 3. Ten borings(B-1 through B-9,and B-11)were drilled into sandstone bedrock in and/or adjacent to the proposed Home Depot building footprint. One boring (B-12) and one test pit (TP-1) were completed at the location of the proposed retaining wall on the east side of the building. Eight shallow borings(B-10,and B-13 through B-19)were drilled across the proposed parking areas. Borings B-1 through B-9 and B-11 were drilled using a truck-mounted hollow stem auger drill rig and Borings B-10 and B-12 through B-19 were drilled using a track-mounted hollow g- stem auger drill rig. Both drill rigs were under subcontract to GeoEngineers. An access road to boring locations B-12 was constructed using a rubber-tired backhoe. Representative soil samples were obtained at 5-foot intervals in all the borings, except B-3, using a 2.4-inch-ID, split-barrel sampler driven into the soil using a 300-pound automatic hammer falling approximately 30 inches. The number of blows for the last 12 inches of sampler . t penetration is recorded on the boring logs. Representative soil samples were obtained at 2.5-foot intervals in boring B-3 using a 1.375-ID, split spoon sampler driven into the soil using a 140-pound automatic hammer falling a distance of approximately 30 inches. The number of blows for the last 12 inches of sampler penetration is recorded on the boring logs. Test pit TP-1 was excavated at the site using a rubber-tired backhoe. The test pit was excavated to a depth of about 15 feet below the ground surface. The boring and test pit explorations were continuously monitored by a geologist or geotechnical engineer from our firm who examined and classified the soils encountered, obtained representative soil samples,and observed ground water conditions at the time of the explorations. Soils were classified in general accordance with the classification system described in Figure A-1. A key to the boring log symbols is presented in Figure A-2. The logs of the borings are presented in Figures A-3 through A-21. The log of test pit is presented in Figure A-22. The logs are based on our interpretation of the field and laboratory data and indicate the various types of soils encountered. They also indicate the depths at which these soils or their characteristics change, although the change might actually be gradual. If the change occurred between samples in the borings,the change was interpreted and is shown on the boring logs. 1 y s i GeoEngineers A-1 File No.2401-119-00-1130\I01599 g }, f , 1 SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM • • MAJOR DIVISIONS GROUP GROUP NAME SYMBOL GW WELL-GRADED GRAVEL,FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL GRAVEL CLEAN GRAVEL ' COARSE GP POORLY-GRADED GRAVEL GRAINED More Than 50% SOILS of Coarse Fraction GM SILTY GRAVEL 5 Retained GRAVEL on No.4 Sieve WITH FINES GC CLAYEY GRAVEL SW WELL-GRADED SAND,FINE TO COARSE SAND SAND CLEAN SAND More Than 60% SP POORLY-GRADED SAND I Retained on More Than 50% No.200 Sieve SM SILTY SAND of Coarse Fraction SAND Passes WITH FINES SC CLAYEY SAND No.4 Sieve ML SILT FINE SILT AND CLAY INORGANIC GRAINED CL CLAY SOILS Liquid Limit ' ORGANIC OL ORGANIC SILT,ORGANIC CLAY Less Than 50 - MH SILT OF HIGH PLASTICITY,ELASTIC SILT . More Than 50% SILT AND CLAY INORGANIC Passes CH CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY,FAT CLAY No.200 Sieve il Liquid Limit 50orMore ORGANIC OH ORGANIC CLAY,ORGANIC SILT HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PEAT I NOTES: SOIL MOSTURE MODIFIERS: 1. Field classification is based on visual examination of soil in Dry- Absence of moisture,dusty,dry to the touch general accordance with ASTM D2488-90. 2. Soil classification using laboratory tests is in general Moist= Damp,but no visible water iaccordance with ASTM D2487-90. Wet- Visible free water or saturated,usually soil is obtained from below 3. Descriptions of soil density or consistency are based on water table z interpretation of blow count data, visual appearance of soils, and/or test data. • . p SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM Geo�/EngineersI FIGURE A-1 f\soila-1.doc LABORATORY TESTS SOIL GRAPH: AL Atterberg Limits SM Soil Group Symbol CP Compaction (See Note 2) CS Consolidation DS Direct shear GS Grain size %F Percent fines Distinct Contact Between HA Hydrometer Analysis Soil Strata SK Permeability SM Moisture Content Gradual or Approximate MD Moisture and density / Location of Change SP Swelling pressure Between Soil Strata TX Triaxial compression UC Unconfined compression CA' Chemical analysis Water Level Bottom of Boring BLOW COUNT/SAMPLE DATA: 22 I Location of relatively Blows required to drive a 2.4-inch I.D. undisturbed sample split-barrel sampler 12 inches or 12 El Location of disturbed sample other indicated distances using a 300-pound hammer falling 30 inches. 17 0 Location of sampling attempt with no recovery 10 El Location of sample obtained Blows required to drive a 1.5-inch I.D. in general accordance with (SPT)split-barrel sampler 12 inches Standard Penetration Test or other indicated distances using a (ASTM D-1586) procedures 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches. — ' 26 m Location of SPT sampling attempt with no recovery ® Location of grab sample "P"indicates sampler pushed with weight of hammer or against weight of drill rig. ,4. NOTES: 1. The reader must refer to the discussion in the report text,the Key to Boring Log Symbols and the exploration logs for a proper understanding of subsurface conditions. 2. Soil classification system is summarized in Figure A-1. -app KEY TO BORING LOG SYMBOLS Geo Engineers FIGURE A-2 .- TEST DATA BORING B-1 DESCRIPTION Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group Surface Elevation(ft.): ±24 Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol . 0 AC Asphalt concrete _0 - - GP Gray fine to coarse gravel with sand and a trace of silt(medium - `OL dense,moist)(fill) - Black coal tailings with occasional silty fine to medium sand - - `~�'` (medium stiff moist)(fill) "'` Concrete debris —1 5— `^^.."` - - SM 33 78 6 I. Glass fragments - `.A`"` —2 - - MI- Gray silt with fine to medium sand and wood fragments(very loose, - wet) - - 10— —3 1 _ MD 45 75 2 ■ ` - —4 SM Gray/brown silty fine to medium sand with fine to medium sand, - silt and peat layers,and wood fragments(very loose,wet) - - 15— - w 1 ® . —5 cc w - - w u- I--- • - w - i— - - — a = uf p 20— —6 t- a - MD 48 81 1 ■: _ o —7 J SM , Brown silty fine to medium sand with occasional fine gravel(very _ 25— loose,wet) - $ %F=18 1 —8 rn - >' SS Light brown silty fine sandstone(very dense,moist)(weathered) rn `r = -9 U MD 17 109 50/3" ■ — _ - — - = —10 35— - 50/4.5" I Becomes gray - - —11 a _ Boring completed at 40.2 feet on 09/20/99 - - Ground water encountered at approximately 14 feet during drilling - o _ ' - 50/5" in — —12 0 40— v `v- Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols g s -4 LOG OF BORING Geo�OEngineers FIGURE A-3 . T TEST DATA • BORING B-2 7 DESCRIPTION S Moisture Dry Content ent Density Blow Group Surface Elevation(ft.): ±26 Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol 0 r ttttttt•ttt U AC Asphalt `0 - : GP Gray fine to coarse gravel with sand and a trace of silt(medium _ 1I. OUSM dense,moist)(fill) _- ' i s E Black coal tailings and orange/brown silty fine to medium sand - (soft/loose,moist)(fill) —1 5— - 4 ■ - PT Brown peat and organic silt with wood fragments and occasional —2 fine gravel and lenses of silty fine sand(soft to stiff;moist) _ !, - 10— —3 - 8 ■ r, - !. —4 ,%,r. Becomes wet _ 3 15— - _ SM 192 11 ■ = - reco w —5 w - - w w - I- ? - .- SM Gray silty fine to medium sand,peat and occasional lenses of coarse _ g _ - sand and fine gravel with large wood fragments(loose,wet) z • n_ — • —6•020 - - F 7 ■ n- w O - —7 `• 25— • - - _ MD 18 109 6 ■ . -8 I o, - - v —9 0 30— _ • . ' Increasing coarse sand and gravel 2 - 6 ■. - SS Tan silty fine sandstone(very dense,moist) - —10 50/2" — 35— ' Refusal encountered at 34.5 feet - - Boring completed at 34.5 feet on 09/22/99 - Ground water encountered at approximately 14 feet during drilling —11 • o - - 0 • o) _ —12 ' 40— 0 v ó Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols i ....... .. ,,,„ LOG OF BORING Geo�-Engineers - FIGURE A-a 1 a ' ' I TESTIDATA BORING B-3 Z I DESCRIPTION Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group Surface Elevation(ft.): 20 -. Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol 0—. 3 0 0 AC Asphalt concrete —0 0 o GP Gray fine to coarse gravel with sand and a trace of silt(medium _ 0 0 0 0 o dense,moist)(fill) -_ . SM/OL Tan silty fine sand with sandstone fragments and black coal tailings _ - • and occasional wood debris(loose/soft,moist)(fill) 4 0 —1 5- 8 0 . —2 SM Brownish gray silty fine sand(loose,moist) l !r . . SM Black silty fine sand with peat and organic matter(loose,wet) - 1 0. - 10— —3 PUSH 0 ML Brown silt with fine sand(very soft,wet) _ —- 4 3 _ SM 87 PUSH 0 - 6 15— - 1 3.. . SP-SM Gray fine to medium sand with silt and occasional organic matter —5 0 w (loose,wet) - w u z - /PT Brown peat with gray silt layers(soft,wet) - w I-- - 7 0 SP Gray fine sand(loose,wet) - z a x • / —6 lit • 20 ;r; . SW Gray fine to coarse sand with occasional fine gravel(medium dense, - a %F=4 14 0. wet) _ 0 •(1 ) ML Brown silt with peat(soft;wet) —7 - 4 0 '• .. SP Gray fine sand with peat layers(loose,wet) - 25 ✓ SM Gray silty fine sand with thin layers of gray fine sandy silt(loose, _ _ 3 0 wet) —8 SM Gray silty fine sand with occasional wood fragments(loose,wet) - 3. rn - 5 0• - c 30— —9 - • %F=30 I 2 0 - - SM Brownish gray silty fine sand with occasional peat and coarse sand —10 2 0 (loose,wet) - 35— /' - IML Brownish gray fine sandy silt with lenses of silty fine sand and peat - 6 (medium stiff wet) —11 : . SM Gray silty fine to medium sand with occasional coarse sand(loose, - o wet) 0 o 40— :-� —12 v `' Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols z 5 I -1 LOG OF BORING Geo�'Engineers r FIGURE A-5 - TEST DATA BORING B-3 (Continued) 7, DESCRIPTION Moisture Content Density Blow Group - Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol 40— 11 - - /SP Gray fine to medium sand with fine to coarse gravel(medium —13 dense,wet) -• - 25 0 D 0 0 GP Gray fine to coarse gravel with fine to coarse sand and a trace of silt - 45— D 0 0 0 (medium dense to dense,wet) - 37 0 0 - D 0 0 O 0 —14 0 O O O O - D 0 0 - 0 0 D 0 0 - 0 O 35 Do 0 0 - 3 D0o0o —15 50— 0 0 _ D O O _ O O - 19 0 0 0 0 D o O O O D O O —16 O O 1 _ 24 or 0 0 - - CL Brown lean clay with occasional fine to medium sand(medium ` 55— ✓ stiff;moist) w SM 40 6 0/ —170 w - m u_ / - w z - X. - w a - 14 0 :. SM Brown silty fine to medium sand(medium dense,wet) —18- z w • 60— _ _ H a 2 �/CL Brownish gray lean clay with fine sand lenses(soft,wet) _ p - SP SM Brown fine to medium sand with silt(loose,wet) - 5 0 - ML Brownish gray fine sandy silt with fine sand lenses(medium stiff - 65— wet) - - —20 SM 31 8 0 / - 3 /' -. SP-SM Brown fine sand with silt(medium dense,wet) i rn —21 rn 21 0:..: :: v 0 70— - - c) %F=12 15 .:. . . _ —22 i 12 0 :. :..:: _ 75— SP Brown fine to medium sand with occasional fine gravel(medium —23 — 0 dense to dense,wet) - 0 - 31 0 - —24 .580— ,/ — sr N Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols I LOG OF BORING Geo�P Engineers FIGURE A-5 . I , • . , • , —,--6, 1 [ • TEST DATA BORING B-3 II (Continued) DESCRIPTION Moisture Dry 0 Content Density Blow Group Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol _80- 1 ;;-`----SS Orange/white silty fine to medium sandstone(dense,moist) _ 35 3 —:= (weathered) _ _ —= -25 - 1 _ 83/10" CI —= Becomes very dense _ 85- —=: -26 , 1 - 50/4" 3 ----- Becomes gray and orange —=- -27 g _ 90- _ 61/3" 3 —.._..--ft: Becomes light gray _ 1 _ _ I —= —= - -28 —=-__- 1 - I ----=- ..i 1 95- 1 75/3" 3__ -29 _ Boring completed at 95.5 feet on 09/27/99 - • F- Ground water encountered at approximately 7 feet during drilling - 2 u., u, - _ Li, u_ I t- , - w z - -30 zM 1 - I _ _ =tu - i- 0 ,00_ IL_ . _ _ -31 _ .i I - .1. 105- -32 1 _ I 1 - v . - ,- 1- 1CN- o I 3 _ -34 ce _ 1 _ I _ I -35 115- - q 1 •i. __ a 1 —36 o 9 I .1 cr, _ 1 20— - o N Note:Se Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols i • I o ....- Ho. LOG OF BORING Geo i .Engineers 41k`l FIGURE A-5 ,i . • h . , I TEST DATA BORING B-4 • DESCRIPTION Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group Surface Elevation(ft.): +20 Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol— • 0 0 U GW Gray fine to coarse gravel with sand(fill) 0 bo _ )o DC r- - 00 0 ..... : ,, , 1 ; - OL Black coal tailings(very soft to soft;moist)(fill) —1 i P5— 1 LAL.A........k I'- L.A_ ._., fi....; _ MD 60 49 2 I - —2- - - MIXT Gray silt and lenses of peat and wood fragments(soft,moist) _IP _ 10— —3 s MD 66 I 58 2 I PT Brown peat(soft;moist) - - ...„.::::„.„.„.. r _ 1 , . MI/FT Gray silt and lenses of peat(soft,moist) —4 - L _ MD 69 49 2 I - ML Gray silt with fine sand(soft,moist) —5 m t u.t - - 1- - tit z - - - .-- -.••SP ..... Gray fine to medium sand with a trace of silt(very loose,wet) z - i . 17-1 x —6 1- -, :1 20— . -.... • - a. 1 2 .. .. •. II •.-.1 - - ii,- a .. .. , .....•. .• Li •. - -•. •.-.• • . _ —7 _ SP-SM Gray fine sand with silt(loose,wet) _ r.4 1 _ 25— 1 - • •• - _ 4 . , I••--. --. .--..-•• . —8 - •• •• - _ ML Gray silt with fine sand,peat lenses and occasional coarse gravel -CO 0) - (medium stig moist) '7 9 14 5 30— _ •- 1 A _ 6 III - - 7 _ 1 r -10 ---" mi., Orange/brown siltstone with fine sand and occasional organic - 35 matter(very stiff moist)(highly weathered)— - 8 I -i i _ 1 9 SS Orange-brown silty fine sandstone(very dense,moist) _- 0) _ —12 40— —,./ 0 , 1 Nr Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols , 'neers LOG OF BORING Geo En 4k,44/1 gl FIGURE A-6 . . 1 • • ‘ .•. TEST DATA BORING B-4 . I , (Continued) DESCRIPTION , Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group Lab Tests (/c) (pct) Count Samples Symbol 40—. _ 50/3" I — - 1 , - i Becomes gray - —13 ___.• .= _ 1 _- 1 Boring completed at 45.3 feet on 09/27/99 - —14 . . Ground water encountered at approximately 20 feet during drilling _ 1 _ E _ 1 , _15 1 1 ri 1 —16 • r , _ to I w ce w z - — , t x 1 z • 0- 1 U.1 0 c : 6.. : 9 - 1 1 I o) 1 —21 - ...- , n _ 4 (3 1 —22 75— 1 - —23 1 _ - _ 1 - o 9 —24 a) _ _ 80— '6' I NT I 0.1 Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols , 1 -6°Pgie, LOG OF BORING Geo Engineers .., 0,,,,,, En 41k10 gl FIGURE A-6 , i , 8 TEST DATA BORING B-5 • . DESCRIPTION Moisture ( Content Density Blow Group Surface Elevation(ft.): Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol • 0 —0 AC Asphalt concrete 0 o o GP Gray fine to coarse gravel with sand and a trace of silt(medium _ • . SM/OL dense,moist)(fill) Grayish brown silty fine to coarse sand and black coal fragments - and brick fragments.(loose/soft,moist)(coal tailings-fill) 1 . 4 ■ —1 }' 5— _ 4 ■ ML Gray fine sandy silt(soft,moist) - —2 r - - Li , I - I SP Dark grayish green fine to medium sand with a trace of silt(loose, - 10— wet) —3 • • r- • —4 I . - OL Dark brown organic silt with peat(very soft;moist) - 15— A. - _ MD 146 31 2 ■ ti �, / —5 w - r�,... SM/SP-SM Gray/brown silty fine to medium sand with interbedded gray fine to - H Z - medium sand with silt(loose,moist) - w • _ Occasional peat layers - 2 • I- - _ z a u —6 =H l...i • 20— n- _ 4 ■•:• . - 0 ¢q _ /.•. •• SM/MI. Gray and brown silty fine to medium sand with layers of gray and €1 brown silt with fine sand(loose/soft,moist) 25— I - I MD 37 79 2 ■ • - —8 co co - • - • Nr • —9 11 0 30— _ _ 9 I OL Dark brown organic silt(medium stiff wet) - _ un�.� _ re lnnnn - rx - vN..,"� •-10 ii - j SM Brown and gray silty fine sand with occasional medium sand and a - 35— trace of organic matter(loose,wet) - _ MD 21 107 6 ■ —11 l 3• 77 0 O 0 • . o 40— J -12 v_ Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols 1 A ., LOG OF BORING Geoff Engineers FIGURE A-7 TEST DATA BORING B-5 (Continued) DESCRIPTION Moisture Content Density Blow Group Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol 40-• 6 - — — SS Orange/brown silty fine sandstone(dense,wet)(weathered) -13 Y 45— - i� 35 IIe - _ —14 ' Becomes very dense —15 50— — - _ 50/5" ■ - ri —16_ Becomes gray - C'; - - 1 55— _ 50/6" � —17 I-. co w _ Boring completed at 56.5 feet on 09/24/99 rr z - i Ground water encountered at approximately 9 feet during drilling _- w 2 M a —18- p 60— - F2- I . • - W i. . - - o - ' —19 L _ _ 65— I _ - —20 - _ i"t - U v - —21 c 70— i - .-,2 - - 10 _' —22 75— I - _ —23 o _ 0 —24 •o 80— - v `s4 Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols 44111' LOG OF BORING Geo OEngineers FIGURE A-7 I r . r if . I TEST DATA BORING B-6 r DESCRIPTION Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group Surface Elevation(ft.): ±22 f' Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol 0 r tip AC Asphalt concrete `0 i.: 0 0 o p - GP Gray fine to coarse gravel with sand and a trace of silt(medium - OL dense,moist)(fill) _ r-, w...�n, Black coal tailings with occasional fine to coarse gravel,glass i • _ MD 40 66 2 I �.nM fragments and wood pieces(very soft,moist)(fill) —1 N A A A _ SM Light gray and brown silty fine to medium sand with occasional 1;'4 5— 3 coarse sand and coal tailings(loose,moist)(fill) - i - / —2 SP Gray fine to medium sand with a trace of coarse sand,fine gravel - and wood pieces(loose,wet) - 10— MD 24 103 6 ■' —3 g SM Brownish gray silty fine to medium sand with fine to medium sand _4 layers with silt interbeds(loose,wet) - c 6.i 15— 6 . w - —5 m rr I - H z - - - w - r; - - z a.s, 20— MD 27 99 6 � Increasing coarse sand —6 H n- w 0 a - %.SP-SM Gray fine to medium sand with silt and occasional layers of brown — 7 silt with fine sand(loose,wet) _ 25— 4 111'• —8 rn ^ i‹ SM Gray silty fine sand(loose,wet) - m - ri 0 30— 5 —9 Li U - —10 35— 5 - —11 O O EIncreasing silt and a trace of organics —12 40— � l o I `" Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols -4 LOG OF BORING Geo l, Engineers rO FIGURE A-8 TEST DATA BORING B-7 (Continued) DESCRIPTION Moisture Content Density Blow Group Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol 40� 0u U - 85/6" I 0 Cy - )o oC - Y ' 1 OO O o�° —13 is _ )4,O O r 45— 50/5" ■0 bC - y.., 0 0Q —14 - I ' CH Greenish gray fat clay with fine to coarse gravel and occasional fine - -E I I to medium sand(soft,wet) - —15 50— I 0 AL 47 4 ® CHT1TBrown fat clay(s(soft,moist) III —16 rP _ ML Light grayish brown laminated silt with occasional fine sand C ; ! laminae(medium sti$moist) _ 55— _ SM 37 7 E —17 w _ co <` - w z - _SS Light gray silty fine sandstone(very dense,moist) - w I —18= 60- 1 50/5" ® — w — — 0 —19 65— - a� _ 50/2" Boring completed at 65.2 on 09/17/99 —20 Ground water encountered at approximately 7.5 feet during drilling - R - I 009 - —21 v. ri0 70— —22 - 75— - _ —23 . o - °' - —24 80— o v Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols , i — I LOG OF BORING Geo�O Engineers FIGURE A-9 1 . I p . 1 1 TEST DATA BORING B-8 DESCRIPTION Moisture Dry Cobtent Density Blow Group Surface Elevation(ft.): ±24 - t S Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol i • 0 AC Asphalt concrete `0 GP Gray fine to coarse gravel with sand and a trace of silt(medium - SM/OL dense,moist)(fill) -_ Brown/black silty fine to coarse sand with occasional fine to coarse - gravel,black coal with brick fragments(very loose/soft,moist) —1 i _ I (fill) - 5— _ MD 52 55 3 ■ .— - - I �^`�OL Black coal tailings with occasional fine sand(very soft,moist)(fill) —2 I - r1 w�..,� - _ �..�� 10- . -3 n = MD 66 49 1 ■ ti� ` • w. —4 F' _ ;l•;•;SW Brown fine to coarse sand with fine to coarse gravel and a trace of - i silt(loose,wet) - 15— - _ 1 9 ■: - w —5 re . . . . w w u- . I— z - w _ ML Gray silt(stiff;moist) - • a , _0 z 20— —6 ,_ n. SM 39 10 ❑ 25— - _ MD 24 100 11 ■r SP-SM Gray fine to medium sand with silt(medium dense,wet) - %F=9 —8• - v SM Gray silty fine to medium sand(medium dense,wet) 0 30— —9 _ SM 49 12 ■ _ %F=24 1 —10 4 SP-SM Gray fine to coarse sand with fine to coarse gravel and silt(medium 35— _ %F=8 dense,wet) _ :128 ■: —11 o _ •o o) - • • - ,o 40— —12 `'� Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols u I �� ��. �� LOG OF BORING Geo • Engineers FIGURE A-10 .. ' 4 TEST DATA BORING B-8 (Continued) F ' DESCRIPTION Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol 40— _ 15 ML Gray silt with fine sand(stiff;moist) - —13 • .----."---:-7 SP-SM Gray fine to medium sand with silt(medium dense,wet) _ 45— _ MD 24 101 26 I't: :.: —14 %F=6 SW Gray/brown fine to coarse sand with fine to coarse gravel and a ........ - • • • • trace of silt(medium dense,wet) . . . . . • • • Li _ ,:. .'........50 SP Gray fine to medium sand(dense,wet) - .•:.... —15 — *.-%.-. • - ti.:. - 34 1'•:•.'• :: - El D 0 0 OP O o Gray fine to coarse gravel with fine to coarse sand and a trace of silt - - D 0 0 (dense,wet) - o o —16 D 0 0 - O 0 - D 0 0 _ _ O 0 i:-.. r) 0 0 _ O 0 55— 1),..,5!......e:- - _ 32 I - SP Gray medium to coarse sand with fine gravel(dense,wet) —17 Grading to medium sand - u) w re w - - w u_ i- - w z - 2 _ 0->;--PT Brown peat with wood fragments(stiff;moist) - I- - —18 n_ 0 it x u - i- 3 60— a. _ tu_ MD 218 21 11 I! .1 _ 0 —19 ‘‘ - t, _ -..., _ ,---1 ML-CL Gray silty clay with lenses of peat and wood fragments(stiff moist) j _ MD 29 95 12 lli ML Gray fine sandy silt(stig moist) —20 rt —21 a) - c xr 70 MD 32 91 5 I 7 AL CL Gray lean clay(medium sta moist) 2 0 -rt _ —22 : j - 75— SP Gray fine to medium sand(medium dense,wet) _ •• - —23 _ - • 12 feet of heave at about 77.5 feet -_ o 9 _ • —24 80— iNr Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols -' a LOG OF BORING Geo 9Engineers 411/4\/' FIGURE A-10 1 • TEST'DATA BORING B-8 (Continued) r•+ 1 DESCRIPTION Moisture Content Density Blow Group Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol 80— 1 25 ■ .::. : - I - _ —25 r r'• 85— 1 —26 _ MD 19 110 26 ■: Occasional fine gravel - E . • .•• . . .. -27 90— _ ! 13 I SM Gray silty fine sand with fine sandy silt layers(medium dense,wet) _ I —28 - _ SS Tan and gray silty fine sandstone(very dense,moist) - - Boring completed at 95.8 feet on 09/21/99 - 95— = Ground water encountered at approximately 11 feet during drilling —29 50/5" ® F- _ co w • m t,, _cL w 1_ w z - x 1 `�z I- I 100— - w _ - o —31 - •• 105— —32 .1 _ a w —33 m - ,.3 0 110— - - —34 • 115— —35 .y o - —36 o I Cr) 120— 0 Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols �� LOG OF BORING Geo�OEngineers FIGURE A-10 t TEST DATA BORING B-9 • DESCRIPTION Moisture Content Density Blow Group Surface Elevation(ft.): ±21 Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol 0— D AC Asphalt concrete —0 - GP Gray fine to coarse gravel with sand and a trace of silt(medium - OL dense,moist)(fill) - • ,.An-A-.... Black coal tailings with occasional silty fine to medium sand and wood fragments(very soft,moist)(fill) _1 I .�.. - - MD 27 71 2 ■ n...M.. - /' —2 • SM Gray silty fine to medium sand with silt layers and coal fragments - - (very loose,wet)(fill) - • • 10— 1 —3 [i •:.SP-SM Gray fine to medium sand with silt and brown silt and peat layers - (very loose,wet) _ —4 15— 2 ■ CL Gray lean clay with peat lenses(soft moist) - w - —5 rn m . u_ - w z z t=- - z n- PT Peat with silt and fine to medium sand lenses and occasional wood 20— _ ���, fragments(soft moist) —6 a _ MD 147 32 3 I! - o - - D o 0 o GP Gray fine to coarse gravel with fine to coarse sand and occasional —7 - - o 0 wood fragments(very loose,wet) 0 0 0 - 25— o o _ i D O O :41 _ MD 45 79 2 ■ ^OL Gray/brown organic silt with fine sand and peat lenses(very soft - wet) `8 I ..�n..i., - M rn SP-SM Gray fine sand with silt(loose,wet) - —9 0 30— • - ci _ MD 27 94 8 ■.:: :: - re _ • - —10 - OL Brown organic silt with lenses of gray fine to medium sand (medium stiff moist) - 35— 1 .,..n✓.... - - MD 64 53 4 ■�'"" - -11 - w.... - O 1 D o°0 GP Gray fine gravel with fi0ne to coarse sand and a trace of silt(medium - o) 0 0 dense to very dense,wet) 40— 0o0o0J —12 E. I `' Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols , �Geo 'moo LOG OF BORING �OEngineers FIGURE A-11 , 1 h 1 ' TEST DATA BORING B-9 (Continued) r:- DESCRIPTION __ S osnte Dry Content Density Blow Group Lab Tests .(M%)i (pet) Count Samples Symbol �� 20 Li 0 0 - o D - - D O O O O - D O O _ j. _ O O D o o —13 50/5" nD°o°o - 0 0 - D O O O O _ 45— D O o 50/6" •DCOOD —14 •• • D O O _ - O O D O O '' - ° • SP Gray medium to coarse sand with fine gravel and occasional coarse _ U - gravel and a trace of fine sand(medium dense,wet) —15 ii50T 22 —16• �/ CL Brown lean clay(medium sti$moist) 55— / - - 15 III SP Gray fine to medium sand(medium dense,wet) —17 w - tn cc w - 1 tit--1 u. • t— z - • - w _ - a~. —18- 60— I• a - tit17 SM Gray silty fine to coarse sand with fine to coarse gravel(medium - o dense,wet) —19 f - 65— _ j - 50/6" III = SS Orange/gray silty fine sandstone(very dense,moist) —20 r - rn - —21 c 70— g - 50/2" ❑— - —22 - Becomes gray - 1 70/4" ❑ — - 75— _ _ - Boring completed at 75.3 feet on 09/23/99 —23 Ground water encountered at approximately 9 feet during drilling - o - 0 - —24 80-- - v N Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols • 0 pi. LOG OF BORING Geoff Engineers FIGURE A-11 Y TEST DATA BORING B-10 DESCRIPTION Moisture Content Density Blow Group Surface Elevation(ft.): ±20 Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol 0AC Asphalt concrete `0 - 0 o oJD o GP Gray fine to coarse gravel with sand and a trace of silt(medium _ �.. , �OL dense,moist)(fill) Black coal tailings with wood particles and pockets of brown silty - � sand(very soft to soft,moist)(fill) 3 ■.�...titi —1 77 5— `^^".. ` MD 34 78 1 I""''"` - - —2 r, 0,04 10— J Na. Blue-gray silt with fine sand,wood fragments and coal particles — • (very soft;moist)(fill) • Y 0 _ , 2 : Gray fine sand with a trace of silt(very loose,wet) Boring completed at 11.5 feet on 09/24/99 'i Ground water encountered at approximately 10.5 feet during - drilling FT ma`' - 15— . w - z - I tt i— - a . s 1 - 20— • • • . 25— I Li i - '�RtriYiFry%1 .o) ,, 0 30— j :... O n: _ i :.. 35— v is <Yas . ' o d> - 1 I - 40— i 0 v Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols I I �p� LOG I ' ....... Geo Engineers \� FIGUktc. • I i • I 1 •'. TEST DATA BORING B-11 z-1 ' I DESCRIPTION . Moistatre Dry Content Density Blow Group Surface Elevation(ft..): ±19.5 Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol 0— ,1 AC .--•0 D 0 0 Asphalt concrete - I ° .c' GP Gray fine to coarse gravel with sand and a trace of silt(medium SP I . • dense,moist)(fill) - _ _ _ 4-- . Gray fine to medium sand with occasional gravel and a trace of silt _ - . and occasional wood fragments(loose,moist) • • —1 _ T.' 5— ••••••• ••• - :. _ I . ..•• ••••• ••• ' Becomes wet - 6 .. . . . —2 ..••. •. •...• ••••• " _ .. ...I . •. .• _ _ - ....•. .• .....•. 10- • •• - -3 1 . .•. .• _ _ MD 30 96 4 . .• :-...'..-, • . . -.••.• • •• •• 1 r _ 1 ?.•-•**. SM Gray silty fine to medium sand(loose,wet) —4 _ - - • _ 15— 1 .• •• . • .•.. . •. -.. . . ' • 2 - _ SM Gray/brown silty fine sand(very loose,wet) _5 co Lu : •. • • . • - • - ill - . ti,-L.L. - : - - • 1- z - . 1 •. •. •• • - •• at = _ _ •... ..•.....• . • z t- .• : •• ..a 0 •Lii ' . - • • • —6 1--20— •-•• • ' o_ . •..• MD 264 18 9 - CI PT Brown peat with silt(medium stig moist) _ • - _ --4:-.:r. GP-GM Gray fine to coarse gravel with fine to coarse sand and silt(medium _—7 - o . a dense,wet) _ -7, • 0 25— . 9 • 0 - J - 19 10 - o •o —8 - . '0 - 0) 9 o I , o . 0 - - 0, - _ _ 0) _. .0 —9 6 30— . o 0 _ Becomes dense, . 50 • _.3. .0 (3 ] 5 re _ • 0 O 0 - - .0 —10 z 0 0 _ - 1 .0 0 0 _ 35— _ - 0 1 _ MD 7 132 33 19 ' 0 —11 0 . c.: 1:i.. - 0 0 _ •0 _ 0 _ O . 0 - 7:' o 0)• - 1 - o - o o —12- '' 40— • 0 _./ 5 INr r. Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols ...- z git LOG OF BORING Geo '"'" Engineers Ilikill FIGURE A-13 , , # f•-• , . TEST DATA BORING B-11 (Continued) Ir,1 1 DESCRIPTION Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol 40— o o Becomes very dense — 50/4" i . -0 0 0 - 0 - 9 . o —13 - o _ • 0 0 _ . . 0 _ r , 45— 0 . o _ 65 SP —14 Gray medium to coarse sand with fine gravel and a trace of fine .; • - - ..- - ..... sand and silt(dense,wet) ... --1 - U _ -•- -.• —15 50— : •• .•' ' - . . . 11 •• - •• .- • . . :• 6 —16••:-.0.;;-;.: GP Brown/gray fine to coarse gravel with medium to coarse sand and a - o 0 o _0 0 trace of silt and fine sand(dense,wet) 0 o 0 55 - _ I 41 0 0 0 0 o .o.00 - —17 oil i— w _ t- Brown-gray lean clay(soft,moist) - - L11 Z - = — i— - . , 60— 1 - It c - W _ MD 46 72 5 II _ 0 - ., ..: -19 ..e.' ' - 65— - Becomes gray ..., 1 4 II 4 -20 1 _. - It I i °' o) _ I SM Red-brown silty fine sand(medium dens;wet)(highly weathered sandstone) - —v - 21 a 70— 1 . • . _ -1 •.-- _ 2 5 - - _ —22 .. - - _ 75— • . -• — - 28 • 23 • - 1 _ o =. SS Gray silty fine sandstone(very dense,moist) _ , 0 c —24 _.= 80— ..:, o; Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols ; - ...... ..., gib LOG OF BORING Geo ' Engineers 41kNtei FIGURE A-13 TEST DATA BORING B-11 • (Continued) Moisture Dry DESCRIPTION Content Density Blow Group Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbl • 80 I64/10" ■ I Boring completed at 81.8 feet on 09/22/99 Ground water encountered at approximately 5 feet during drilling 25 85— —26 —27 90— py - t. C": - —28 95— 29 t- ^ to w w - - • - w u. z - t- _ w - —30 Pm z 100— - F- a w - O —31 105— —32 sn —33 rn - v 0 110— —34 s 115— I ^ —35 i ^ 0 _ —36 0 120— `' Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols LOG OF BORING Geoff Engineers FIGURE A-13 I. TEST DATA BORING B-12 Moisture DESCRIPTION Content Density Blow Group Surface Elevation(ft.): f44 0— Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol SM Dark brown silty fine to coarse sand with fine to coarse gravel and —0 nails(loose,moist)(fill) - - • —1 5— _ 6 ■ _ MD 9 88 - - —2 1 0 - 1 SP Light brown fine to medium sand with coal fragments(loose,moist) 10— .- (coal tailings-fill) 7 IIIM OL Black coal tailings with brown silty sand and fragments of orange -3 sandstone(medium stir moist)(fill) 1.1 - � �` Seepage at 10.5 feet • •......,....._....A. —4 w.nn, - 15— - ti - 7 ■ ,t. _ ta w - —5 m "- = SS Tan and orange silty fine sandstone(very dense,moist)(weathered) -- Fw..z - I _ _ w zM a_ z_ o_ _ :t 20— _— —6 = - MD 12 98 50/1" I - - w _ _ Becomes light gray - - - —7 25— - 50/4" ■_ - 3 - -8 It i( o _ - v - 0 30— ce Very hard drilling at about 33 feet - 50/1" ❑ = —10 i Boring completed at 33.5 feet due to refusal on 09/27/99 35— Ground water seepage encountered at 10.5 feet during drilling _ - • —11 o 0 - 40— —12 v N Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols III �IGeo LOG OF BORING ��Engineers FIGURE A-14 P. ....• j . ' 1- • • TEST DATA BORING B-13 .. . i . i . DESCRIPTION Mol isture Dry Content Density Blow Group Surface Elevation(ft.): ±21 .f.--. 3 : Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol . —0 1 0 - AC Asphalt concrete - o _AD 0 °•• - GP Gray fine to coarse gravel with sand and a trace of silt(medium _ SM dense,moist)(fill) .-.• • . - '..-, - .K Brown-gray silty sand with sandstone fragments and coal(soft,'. . .. . - moist)(fill) t.I: 1 7 I:.• ...,..: ' -1 - , - • .. • . 73 5- • - 2 II•::.' : :- - -2 •.• - ' - -.• • • - Li _. : -' 10- .• .: sm Gray silty fine sand with occasional coarse sand(loose,wet) _ -3 r. _ ID PUSH •• :' . ['l - Boring completed at 11.5 feet on 09/24/99 - Ground water encountered at approximately 10 feet during drilling - r! - -4 I • - - 15- -i- - tu w - - w u_ - tu z - 1 = z - I 20- - -6 t- n_ i - 0 . .. - i - -7 - - 25- - 4 _ _ -8 1 _ - • _ il co - cn - v -9 1 2 t.) - x _ -10 i - - 1 _ , - i - - 1 - - - . - , 0) N i rr, c Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols i - I ....- , gib LOG OF BORING . Geo ' Engineers 41\10011 FIGURE A-15 • yA TEST DATA BORING B-14 F . DESCRIPTION Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group Surface Elevation(ft.): +19 Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol 0 r MI AC Asphalt concrete 0 0 0 0 p o GP Gray fine to coarse gravel with sand and a trace of silt(medium _ OL dense,moist)(fill) _ - Black coal tailings with wood fragments and occasional zones of - - 3 ■ � gray silty sand and occasional fine gravel(soft,moist)(coal —1 tailings) _ - ' 5— ,..........A. - • 1 I SM Gray silty fine sand(loose,moist) - -2 LA ri - 10- . . . -3 ML Gray sandy silt with organic material(very soft,wet) -:II PUSH II - Boring completed at 11.5 feet on 0924/99' Ground water encountered at approximately 10 feet during drilling - - —4 Li - 15— i - f'"''• w - —5 ccco w - - w u_ F- z - al 2 z z o_ —6 H 20— - w - - a • - —7 • 25— - iJ _ —8 3 o i � 30— o: - 1 _ —10 35- - —11 x - o - -12 y 40— 0 V `" Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols i LOG OF BORING Geo�O Engineers FIGURE A-16 2 I I • . 1.“ . , • TEST DATA BORING B-15 •17-' • DESCRIPTION Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group Surface Elevation(ft.): 19.5 to,0 Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol • 0 II=II AC Asphalt concrete ...—0 - 0 0 0 — I 0 -0_ GP Gray fine to coarse gravel with sand and a trace of silt(medium _ OL dens;moist)(fill) , _ Black coal tailings with coarse gravel,pockets of gray silty sand _ i... : - 2 1,...................... and wood particles(soft,moist)(coal tailings) —1 5— - ,-.‘,..A_A-..... SP-SM Gray fine sand with silt(vety loose,moist) —2 - . - r!. - .•. . - :. .. Li - -• . _ ML Gray sandy silt with organic material(very soft,wet) —3 F.1 _ ' PUSH I - Boring completed at 11.5 feet on 09/24/99 -- Ground water encountered at approximately 10 feet during drilling - - —4 t--- ! - - 15— - _ —5 i— La - (t)cc tit - , - tit u_ I— - I —6 l- 20— e a.tit _ - in ' - - —7 - [ 25— _ _...; _ : —8 _ .1 _ - a) - in —9 -0 a 30— - re —1 0 r _ 1 - 35— ! _ [ 2 — 1 -m - : cin —1 , ..- 5 v. Csl Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols ; 411 , — . LOG OF BORING Geo 9Engineers 4IN4/. FIGURE A-17 TEST DATA BORING B-16 DESCRIPTION Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group Surface Elevation(ft.): 122 Lab Tests (%) (pct) Count Samples Symbol 0 0 7 a, 7,AC Asphalt concrete • - o ° GP Gray fine to coarse gravel with sand and a trace of silt(medium OL dense,moist)(fill) - - Black coal tailings with debris including concrete and scrap metal - 3 �' (soft,moist)(coal tailings-fill) -1 5— ✓ SP Orange medium to coarse sand with sandstone and coal fragments 7 :. .. (loose,moist)(fill) - • —2 10— - OL Black fine to coarse coal tailings with pockets of gray silty sand —3 •..&.w. (loose,wet)(coal tailings-fill) - - Boring completed at 11.5 feet on 0924/99 - - Ground water encountered at approximately 10 feet during drilling - —4 I 15- - - — w - —5- rn w Lu - la z _ I- _ - w f- - _ a z 20— —g a. w - o - - —7 25— - - —8 rn - rn - in - 0 30— I —9 U 1 m 9 - —10 - 35— I _ - —11 0 9 - 0 40— —12 c `' Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols �1�' LOG OF BORING Engineers GeoN.ff E FIGURE A-18 TEST DATA BORING B-16 i� Moisture Dry DESCRIPTION Content Density Blow Group Surface Elevation(R): ±22 O_,Lab Tests CYO (pct) Count Samples Symbol o_-o_-AC Asphalt concrete —o 0 o Gp Gray fine to coarse gravel with sand and a trace of silt(medium - r. - ,,"`OL dense,moist)(fill) - - �„M Black coal tailings with debris including concrete and scrap metal - I 3 ...,........A...,... (soft,moist)(coal tailings-fill) - -1 5 SP Orange medium to coarse sand with sandstone and coal fragments - - 7 (loose,moist)(fill) —2 L:In - 10— �^^^OL Black fine to coarse coal tailings gs with pockets of gray silty sand —3 A. (loose,wet)(coal tailings-fill) Boring completed at 11.5 feet on 09/24/99 - - Ground water encountered at approximately 10 feet during drilling -. - r: —4 '15— w _ w - u —5 W z - - w . i- - I - w a_ I - w 20— - Z —6 = _ F- _ a. - w - o _ l - —7 25— - —8 w y v 0 30— - —9 - - - _ —10 35— _ - - —11 0 0 o') - _ - 40— 0 —12 Nr N Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols i. Geo���En 'veers LOG OF BORING \.� FIGURE A-18 V.. I 4 TEST DATA BORING B-17 1 DESCRIPTION Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group Surface Elevation(ft.): ±21 0--Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol • AC Asphalt concrete 0 - o ° e GP Gray fine to coarse gravel with sand and a trace of silt(medium M OL dense,moist)(fill) w v. Black coal tailings(very soft to medium stig dry)(fill) .A.A.-A. 5— """`` - - 1 4 w Becomes moist - - A. - —2 • - Li - ... 10— ! ..�..� —3 r; — 2 I.�.. Becomes wet c - A AA A Boring completed at 11.5 feet on 09/24/99 - Ground water encountered at approximately 10 feet during drilling - -4 15— j - - Lu - to w - —5 n u_ z - - FW- - W H I _ n ! z 20— ! • —6 H - a w - o - I —7 25— i - - -8 L ory - 0 30— —9 U -i _ —10 -35— I 1 - 1 V —11 i o - I o I o� ? '- I - • r 40— —12 0 v `~ Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols LOG OF BORING Geo�O Engineers FIGURE A-19 , ) • , - , • TEST DATA BORING B-18 1 - r. . DESCRIPTION Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group Surface Elevation(ft.): ±23 ...--. Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol 0— Nom=Ars Asphalt concrete —0 '''''' - 0 0 GP Gray fine to coarse gravel with sand and a trace of silt(medium _ ..............A_A.OL dense,moist)(fill) _ _ ... . Black coal tailings with fine to medium sand and occasional wood - - matter(soft,moist)(coal,tailings-fill) 5 I......... -i 1- .. _ ,..— 5— ............._...A. I ,.................. - 4 I - , . ,...................... —2 .........A_AA. _ r-- .,....A. - ; . ,...............A. - L.3 . ...AA-A.A. _ 10— _ ...........-A...... —3 _ .1 3 I......-A-A.A. - Boring completed at 11.5 feet on 09/24/99 - —4 15— - _ at - - w u_ I z I-- - In- 2_ = i- - ' - — a_ . = ' • —6 : 20— I a_ - w - rn. _ 1 - _ -7 .... : I 25— —a I - .,.., _ 1 - j al - cn - ....: 6 30— _ , .,... :I cc 1 —10 . ;i _ ..,,,.. 35— _ _ '—''i 1 — _ D ,.•.: 9 — cn — —1 2 .: 40— '5 cs4 Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols A :.,..: 1....:. , ...- Op LOG OF BORING .,,, ..„„,,,,, Geo Engineers 4 / FIGURE A-20 r S•'. 1 ''. a '' , • I TEST DATA BORING B-19 DESCRIPTION Moisture Content Density Blow Group Surface Elevation(ft.): ±18 Lab Tests (%) (pct) Count Samples Symbol • 0— o o GP Gray fine to coarse gravel with sand and a trace of silt(medium —0 ML dense,moist)(fill) - • Bluish green silt with fine sand and occasional organic matter and x:. charcoal pieces(soft,moist)(fill) - - • 5 I♦ —1 5— / ML Grayish brown sandy silt with occasional wood particles(soft, 7 2 moist)(fill) - i . - �M OL Black coal tailings with coarse sand and wood fragments(very soft, —2 moist)(coal tailings-fill) 1 s I _ 10— ML Gray sandy silt with occasional roots(very soft,moist) —3 -� - 1 II - Boring completed at 11.5 feet on 09/24/99 - F _ —4 i 15— - - 1-- _ - w - —5 CO o: - w x _ I— - z 0 20— —6 ~ n- w - O - _ —7 - I 25— - 3 - —8 3 rn v - 0 30— —9 tr - _ -10 I 35— 1 _ —11 0 9 - co - 40— —12 o Q cv Note:Seel Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols i li i LOG OF BORING Geo'OEngineers FIGURE A-21 .... C.' g s: q ) • • 7.— TEST DATA TEST PIT TP-1 •• 175 DESCRIPTION 4,... Moisture Dry Lab Tests (S4o)ntent Density Blow Group Surface Elevation(ft.): ±47 (pci) Count Samples Symbol ,.._,• 0_ D0000 GP Brown sandy fine to coarse gravel with organic matter(rootS) —0 _ 1 '•, - D 0 0 • • •: 01/SM (loose,dry)(fill) _ Black coal tailings mixed with light brown to orange silty fine sand _ I ; 1 and organic matter(roots)(medium stiff/loose,dry)(fill) _ , I —1 "f• . _ i...i I _ I I !: _ _ 5— I I I 1 --; I!. - —2 - . . ?...".. I I _ _ El 1 : —3 10— 1 I I _ n , , _ , I i - F-S. _ _ I i I 1. _ ,•- ii 15— , Test pit completed at about 15 feet on 09/25/99 - _ Minor caving along sidewalls for full depth i— -5 co u.i • re "--c - tu al - •-. .. Li_ , i— , - - u.1 - I . _ x I z- . - — a = :-.7-t LIJ —61. ' - 20 fm — a._ w _ _ . —7 _ : ;.• 1 _ _ . 25— ' - --7 .v . . - i . —8 - I _. , i ER - - •gr —9 30— - I 2 _ 1 _ _ • -.1 - , , _—10 S - _ - —11 • _ _ 0 0 _ .. o ,-- , —12 40— , El. Csi • Note:See'figure A-2 for explanation of symbols LOG OF TEST PIT . • • . Geo ''Engineers 4‘10°. FIGURE A-22 r r 4 rf • • • rn ii ; APPENDIX B 3 ;.t 1. DRAFT u APPENDIX B LABORATORY TESTING GENERAL Soil samples obtained from the boring were transported to our laboratory and examined to confirm or modify field classifications, as well as to evaluate engineering properties of the soil. Representative samples were selected for laboratory testing consisting of moisture content and density determinations, percent passing the U.S. No. 200 Sieve, and Atterberg Limits. The tests we're performed in general accordance with test methods of the American Society for Testing and Materials(ASTM)or other applicable procedures. VISUAL CLASSIFICATIONS All soil samples obtained from the borings were visually classified in the field and/or in our laboratory using a system based on the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) and ASTM E� classification methods. ASTM test method D 2488 was used to visually classify the soil samples, while ASTM D 2487 was used to classify the soils based on laboratory tests results. These classification procedures are incorporated in the boring logs and test pit shown in Figure A-3 i through A-22,in Appendix A. MOISTURE CONTENT Moisture contents were obtained in general accordance with ASTM D 2216 for several samples obtained from the borings. The results of these tests are presented on the boring logs at the respective sample depth in Appendix A. DRY DENSITY Dry densities were evaluated for several relatively undisturbed samples obtained with the split;barrel ring sampler. The tests were conducted in general accordance with ASTM D 2937 and the results are presented on the boring logs in Appendix A at the respective sample depth. SIEVE ANALYSIS Sieve analyses were performed on several samples in general accordance with ASTM D 422. Several samples were "washed" through the No. 200 mesh sieve to estimate the relative percentages of coarse and fine-grained particles in the soil. The percent passing value represents the percentage by weight of the sample finer than the U.S. No. 200 sieve. These tests were conducted to verify field descriptions and to estimate the fines content for liquefaction analyses purposes. The tests were conducted in general accordance with ASTM D 1140 and the results are shown on the boring logs in Appendix A at the respective sample depth. G e o E n g i n e e r s B-1 File No. 2401-119-00-1130\101599 i~ • DRAFT ATTERBERG LIMITS Atterberg limit tests were completed for two soil samples obtained from B-7 and B-8. The tests were used to classify the soil as well as to aid in evaluating index properties and consolidation characteristics of the clay deposits. The liquid limit and the plastic limit were obtained in general accordance with ASTM D 4318. The results of the Atterberg limits are summarized in Figure B-1 and also on the respective boring logs in Appendix A. The plasticity chart relates the plasticity index(liquid limit minus the plastic limit)to the liquid limit. CORROSION TESTING Three soil samples were sent to Norton Corrosion to evaluate the corrosion potential of the f : soils. The samples were taken in the coal tailings, organic silt, and peat that were expected to have the highest corrosive activity which could damage pile systems. The results of Norton r1 Corrosions analyses are attached(Results not available for the draft report). • 4 P • G e o E:n g i n e e r s B-2 File No. 2401-119-00-1130\101599 . 'Ciw:..... I. .. .1. r..:_.. .. :� -nrr••� 1.'•. r•� .'1 . .. ;f�.:..,.,�, J i Y do 2401-119-00 RCM:MBB:mbb 9/27/99(Atterbergs.ppt) r PLASTICIrYCHART C.) - -- - ---- - - - ------ ---- - - ---- -CD 60 60 ,�l��a .. tt • Ss CH or OH W 40 CD CA P�� F 30 ���• f . co • J - OH and MH '• 20 9 • CL or OL El ss D 10 ./ CL-ML ML or OL x m 0 .� 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 r c LIQUID LIMIT m c(n W M EXPLORATION SAMPLE MOISTURE LIQUID PLASTICITY CA-I- SYMBOL NUMBER DEPTH CONTENT(%) LIMIT(%) INDEX(%) SOIL DESCRIPTION • 73 m CO c r ® B-7 50' 47 53 27 Brown fat clay(CH) N 0 B-8 70.5' 32 34 14 Gray lean clay(CL) t. • .' Jljjsiit'nilP(1+'9C'Jia`.r ...:. CL'[S.V .: _ '.4010 _ _ �._._._....tt� •' t --``--.. • 1 EASEMIS'AT j� --"- : r. THIS INDENTURE, made this 21st day of April • 19 _, between PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, ..nd PUGET PROPERTIES, INC, Washington Corporations, herein called GRANTORS, • - and CITY OF RENTON, herein called GRANTEE, WITNESSETH: . That it 'onsideration of the sum of ONE DOLLAR • DOLLARS ($1.00 ) in hand paid, receipt of �{ which is hereby acknowledged, and the performance by Grantee of r` the covenants hereinafter set forth, Grantors for their joint and • t\ separate interests hereby grant unto Grantee, without warranty cf 4. MN any kind, a right of way not exceeding 5 feet in width on each • side of t`feCenter,, line.hereinafter described, for the construction, • ,' -:; . ' . ancr and opet....ion of the following described service facility: SANITARY SEWER TRUNK LINE within and across and following described land situated in the a i . - County of King. State of Washington, to wit: ti:. . • F The west one half of Section 20 and the northeast _ . quarter of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5, . East, W.M. o , . The center line of said facility shall be located as follows: = ~�` Beginning at the center of said Section 20, thence South 01°46'02" West along the north-south center • line of said f:^_lion 20, a distance of 953.37 feet ���(��(C( PLANNING • to a point on the center line of 12th Place South; CITY OF -,TON thence South 89°10'20' West along said center line, a distance of 653.78 feet to the true point of NOV ® • 1999 beginning; thence North 12°03'09" West a distance of 7.11 feet; thence North 27°03'19" East a dis- tance of 205.09 feet; thence North 62°02'51" West RECE ED 7'` `5.,:. ✓ r ... �. - i' J 'ylSt T,: f ..7� �1i •.�,. r . ..._. ;vc4.4707 t+ t% • • a distance of 107.09 feet; thence N. 31°38'06" West a distance of 145.12 feet; thence N 48° 46'21" West a distance of 191.99 feet; thence N 01°55'45" West a distance of 65.28 feet; thence N 34°13'37" West a distance of 143.34 feet; thence North 26°52'14" West a distance of 179.19 feet; thence North 02°20'59" West a distance of 98.61 feet; thence North 39°36'03" West a distance of 136.87 feet; thence North 00°57'52" West a distance of 104.01 feet; thence North 41°26'37" West a distance of 129.01 feet; thence North 16°38'29" West a distance of 192.35 feet; thence North 08°34'46" East a distance of 105.15 feet; thence North 27°05'14" West a distance of 189.17 feet; thence North 31°08'07" West a distance of 239.61 feet; thence North 21°26'59" West a distance of 272.51 feet; thence North 18°40'44" West a distance of 106.24 feet; thence North 32°12'52" West a distance of 51.66 feet; thence North 16°58'37" West a distance of 144.26 feet; thence North 35°10'45" West a distance of 107.28 feet; thence North 22°14'15" West a distance of 424.28 feet; thence North 44°57'15" West a distance of 112.14 faet; thence North 51°08'26" West a distance of 166.38 feet; thence•South 46°43'34" West a dis- tance of 248.09 `eet; thence South 17°04'56" • • W •t a distance of 142.50 feet; thence North 8S 37'41" West a distance of 409.44 feet; thence South 02°09'57" West a distance of 763.70 feet; thence North 89'43'30" West a distance of 18.00 feet to a point on the center line of the Talbot Road, said point being the terminus of this easement and lying North 09°59'59" West a dis- tance of 1,125.91 feet from the East one S arter corner of said Section 19. Except Roads This easement is granted on the following terms and con- ditions: 1. Grantee agrees to save and hold Grantor$ harmless from all loss or damage which may be due to the exercise by Grantee of the right herein granted and from all claims for such damage by whomsoever made end to indemnify Grantors for all such loss, damage and claims. 2. Grantors reserve the right to use said land for their own purposes in any way, and to grant rights in said land ` I tra4' 7ea1 to others, not inconsistent with the right herein granted to 4011 Grantee, and Grantee hereby assumes all risk of loss or damage, r. including da.sage or injury to persona or to property, which Cei may be suffered by Grantee resulting from Grantors' use of said land and any of its equipment thereon, whether said damage or injury be due to the negligence of Grantors, their servants or agents, or otherwise. 3. 'Erie right hereby granted shall cease and determine whenever Grantee shall have permanently abandoned the use of said facility and upon such abandonment Grantee shall remove its facility and restore the premises to as good a condition as they were in prior to the construction of said facility. 4. If the Grantee, its successors or assigns makes an 'excavation in The Grantors' property, it shall without delay restore the surface as nearly as practicable to the same con- dition as it was in before the doing of such work. 5. The location of said right of way is shown on map dated March 19, 1965, prepared by M. C. MacLearnsberry, copy of which is attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been executed by the parties hereto as of the day and year first above writ • _ • • " ' PUGET SO POWER & LIGHT COMPANY • ter. , GRANTOR line Pres nt ! 4. ( etary • • f.:. . J 1 i:4 k- • }-.. t iff STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) as. COUNTY OP KING -) On this 21at •day of April , 19 65 , before me personally appeared- E. P. MOD= and C. D. OCBCIOOL ' - •r qo me known to be th Vine lrseidsat and 8earetert respectively, of PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, one"of the corporations that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of !aid corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my haXiOsvm, and affixed my official seal the day and year first algove.�y �;`• . written. -C'� :S.4b.iC'I_.. c� • Notary Pub3 �and for the'. :ate,.;;g. - of Washington, riding at Bel mil. . . _n,, eb 70"tl • • . u ;t CA-— - PUGET PROPERTIES, INC. i fl+• % ti£1111t.� By � •l t I�s i..f . Vice President GRANTOR • . Sic etary STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) as. COUNTY OF KING ) On this 2let day of jpril , 19Ayr_, before me personally appeared F. W. RI] ,T. and C. B. MOgNpOL , to me known to be nee President and S.wVtary , respectively, of PUGET PROPERTIES,INC., one of..tb"+ corporations that executed the within and fore- i going instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute said instrument and [AW that the seals affixed are the corporate seals of said corporations. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above ,!›.-li -ge-6.4. . :11 .�i ,...:1 Notary Public for the State +°' ,c e; 'of Washington, re ing at Balevue ,. . rus` `:':a f,'•.NIIY 0.rtit d tamer : :..... :,..• • . . , •-. -••- ... •. ••,. •...:-:.s:-.;,..---:•,---.. • ..-:•.•...-.•... 1,'„:,;;;,..., ..-..:.:i.l..,..,:. .,...,:•:.-,?:.',..', .••••:',..',...r':::;;si-.•••---;•:••...•...,.t...,.. 'i,,Z:::•\.-;:&A.•::,, •,:,;.•:7.4••.";;.Z1.•.;';,--%;','..,,.i'`:,..';:••,;•...:,:.:.-..:,-...'.7,•;:••:••::!... :: • •...•.. -... •:.:..,••:. •••,.:. ,••••• •..... •• ... ...:.i.,,•:•.•:':43---)::::-"P.. .;;,::•:-.F.:?..-.01.-.!••,.i.:•.-,i-,;•;,.;..:,::::.; , .:15:53,,?,,0 ,7, g„I§:fsit.,v,.:,•,7,.„,;77.e,,,.y.:-. ., ) .h•:.:.• .. •....., . ,. .,:,„...,... • ..........,........,1,.....4:-...,;.ik.'; ::-Eie..4'.0,4.,, ,,s..... .z.,,,,.....;•,-4.:,tc...0.57.,.),1..s.,141,,,,lval.:--.'s..7.ili..,`.,..c.r.:-.%k*.e.44.1.7- ft......"1..1,...,....., eVAMT, ....,..;.---... ..... ,.....„..,. .. ........ ._ •-", -.... . .• ••• •• '.... • ZS,. -- •Z•,-.77.t.:,!,...e...:.!..:;:e......67,7. L.,;„?....' .:.. ,!::.,. ... .. . '• . ?'', ',- • .. . 1:-. 1..:::17:1'.-. _L. .•••'..•• 1;:..;:**: : -•;f:...: .... .-*•,.-. ' ....,1--,.........-'.‘,'.•;!.'.:•-•::;:-., ..••:;.--.!:..7:.;:t ' t......: --- ,..•••••;*•.'"7...". .1.... .:-.:.:*"....'4`•• . '- .-,;•-• .:,..•,- ,:.t...,••.-:::. ' -..:-...','0,;,-.•:•.• :`. •••' ...'.':':•-..f"::: .•'..-7:•:.. . ..'•s';...?......;••.;.'ic...-.?.,--.:!-;;..:-;':•' !...--1,::: ..•;''. '...- ',••.--...,- '. .7..;.""r.....,:l'.i......: ;.: .,.;•-•'• •.:-::.;.:;'.. ••...;:**,:'.-..:-..:.....:: ..4::.,4:1....1:•..?-..:::;',:....-.• -.0.' .7"•,:'_-...ti'.-:".•.; -• .. .:-:' .... '.. ..--....''.- "••••••*$?4•.- ---...‘-k*-•:--""- ' --...."-Y-1*-7.11"t'' "• •=4 "- • -A.A:. --: r..-.r-0-=',..,..:% A k;-...,...,-,. ....-•,..'''&1•"g44 %•.•..}.",it . . ;?-e; ,---. ,,,, ... 4..`4tti•- -' ,,,,,_.14C.P.,,_.". . ir.AV.34;titr•-t: ' • i.1,;PAU/.11, L, . .. ,...•.:. .. &.,„2.i......!....,.,iic,... ..,; .y.t;...:,!,,t,_::•.,.•0•,,tif,..11.,...4:...k.,.. ..,-,.!_wil ,,,, .. iiku.tvaci.h.,ica.._-.....;,,,...::,,eiN.?1„44,,..!.:.,illt.•:„.,...,.....,.....„...-: ;:-.1._•,"v4;,:_i .-•-). - . •ro.. .•'r i"'•••• ••7•7< ."rn,,:1,4,11f5 ,67'.-1•ii.,::...i-ii: 1;',16.k..,-,,,.ij.t.k,•,t:...i .4ril.;•,' •,..•.•'••••' •..,;,i-....- - N,.•••?• .:-.".,7•-isic;ii.,%..1-;;;;•?.";A'-kr:,r;,-i.;.; '...'..t'l - ',...:...4,4...VI:.':'..c.,t1": `•tr.r . •. *.:;,,iii:"....-r . 111-' -'I' ..';.,•....% f46,;!`,..!.,!.::,c ;c,-,)4.:,•„,??,,..•,A,-..,-,0,;--•,..:1,r,•,-.,-teq't`r:--,..•.'•-•'!?:,,,Z.Fli, ..›.'.4....P•ti•.iiiil*44takt'.%. :474. tilylITED1PCESS31-•'.,..:4:8?. ..:1-,....:•"'.•:'• ••-• .--i.: . .•it...,T...', .-'`'':$:;t"tt.,..:.,•.$`'.7'.'•.'F.3:.'-'1'. ,!:?•$1•)•''It':1,-,&:1,,..T't.ea•atadt..r.4.'-'-.11''-':''' •"i .VI-'.-',-‘:.41-.4" ' • !ZI 54 iert.:1`11.1A.1.'. P...fi?Oi.,21* •'. '1 I• •G -,;- , ,,. ' .. C./..,, ,,:g..i.i,;,,,,,,,,...;,•,.,2....!,....-,.....!,,..-0, .... ,,,,a,, .,.•. •iv.A.,e,:kp;,. :;•:-AY, :,.,:itiii.- - •i•..?- -V....,.,*•.:. ,.•',.. .,... 4' 'tp.„41s- tws:`" 'Tt•C'''....6'..4-:,16..4...q•'•::-:...1:liti ..1• t.'-4.-:;,°•.•-•-....• , . - :,-• Itt. ...-,:..1.:;:r..,,......,i,7:..;;.--..i.e:s.........-,....-_-t,'-...4,;;;,.:....... __,,..:.., •.-e•-.A=,..,,,_-..- 4,,.. . :,, 4.41,....., ' 4:14, '''''• •,''-41e''''.-,''''' -•'''•• -4i,,,t,1` 1,3%1;:f.:•,... - -• :''''. 1 t ;J'•111-.THE !ATTER-Of s.priiiisri,stita::-.Rigfitia rira-..„.3.4.,:'-,Tet.:!.15.41flici.:85-X7 'filtsti.... •No.,.2 in Ben ton, 4 ..... ,,,..„,.,',.c..e.-..-..i. .,"Az_ ' --'. ' '.. • t• •-i.", -•.:,',........•••.....• •••,...,.... ,---:..•,..... ;•:-•••• f•-•oi•---4-4,e,-,pk,i-w'Ai'll'.'.4%••:,/,..).,E4.••,1eitt„'f0 -fi-L.,.4.•••• ••.,,i .A:•,..,....?y...,..,: ••••--:.!.- -.,..-.1.111,t,: : . 4f-x..-..,-;•;.,.... •.. .•, 4: ..,,,,,..,e.,.....„.;. ..,.,..,..„,•,.....: ,,....,t.-.:::::•?;,...,,.:.:91,1:X. ,r;,.??1,•;,,,. ,o(,,i.-:yttql:',/,_il'-•-!.q.1.1.0,•..--*"'"A• :-' -••••••- ..'4"'".1'4--4,..''"tp,'• ,..,•,' i.cm.-'..,•1: ..-r. 7) •• :. teir"..:---,•'- 7.''''....:s•,. o: '•'-'...NNOW:ALL'MN Br.,TIESt' ithet4.' hil'Alren.stor,..ipaart:Ng.NP•:.Paga:.&4 ,•04"t•-:-•-4•T!":t s'.1".......--:. ..-. .:•-4-4,•:: - • ,,,,IF,!:,..-•:•:::-::-. • • . ::•.::..•.:.,.,:....::.•i..,„,,.1.-....,,•7,11..g.,.:,t7:73.cpiiiv;'.04k1,•* .i'•,.T.,..1104v•olt.44,.4?.*;;Jr,n,.......-,,.;,,.i.-•:,•::,.!..:,,J.!•:-.• .;i....... • :.-5'4,-,,,•-, ••• • . y:,,..,,,....-..-; , ....., :::i.v.,.:-....a isii4o ra tic si,..''for and:in.diosideratiort..ofltbirsitii•o4.7121:ituid910/100:1(010.00)::.dolls rs,•:end•:..-'.:.. ..7j. . • .Z....--,y/,.y..,t.. -, •'' • ..114...:'':' ...''.%!,;.:,'..' '..''..': * •' .',•4'2'.ftrd;.%.'..•-•,":",'t,t''''';'esAlik',6A'' ''''."-414'./fi ItillgO'eA''4.3'•:.4::.'Y'`‘.4;51.:'::.:1.-.......:.f.,,..:•'' ';;.:-:•'..:i,!..;:Ai • .'. ...i,;;;:.''',‘..:,;:f..." . other valsiable considers tiona i'..here.bf;e01!•7#726il...virrantel...,tatAhe•-•„,0te .cof.,...W.*s hiss gton,. the:.':it, ,..:*. •..., . .: • '9'''Y.'ri•..''''•'...,.....':•' j' ........1/...,.:t•I:''••..',.‘‘..6.?,, . ,,':c•':,.,;.64%11ea.f',..e•:, . .101.,, ,11P•A'3‘;',".s,f.,,',:•"'.7:, ..''..': .......;...., .........C:...:"'''':r.',;)';yzei'i, ._ .. .. V-.•;;;?,',15,:-..• --.. . • . , .1.;•••.'..:!i.,-*!following described real estate'situated;in*King COnntYa in:the.State ofi: as.hi ng tort...;,... ....!...e.-A, • ./...,.....:•:::,.,...:--.:f.... . „, .. . • - - . :..........,._ .....!••:.,.....? oii,,:•,.. ....,--"•::„...-..:e...:.'::•;:..1-i;•-••s ::. .:•:•:-..,:•-:;;..y...'.:.".t.- ••••• '•:.• .-.. .-':•'•',;;.";: • : ••;:;-•••:-..-':•''•:"• ' •.'•;•• • . ;.-, - :e•::::::'.-1. 'A.strip of land 214 feet in width,••.being 1.40.:fesit:-wide On the Out side and le.x) fee t ‘i.tie•:,-t;'6 . ..,ff,;:;.s:;,,,.:y..-..:• ' ••.• .. .,, ,.. ..;f4..2:'....i-:. on •:A woe t aide of the center linisi.or•PrisaarY State'.!lighwey to..li'.'Jc t. SIN No. 5-!::to .......i.::•71:" ••.. -9.•4?; .•;,•?.....•••,•:.• . - , . . -,•...• Jot. Rini No. 2 in Renton,•as surveyed,over..and across•the .following idestcri bed Pnr:lel "A",. .j.•,,.., . .. t!,..:-.:::..,.:....• . ?,xCr.1,1•that fr=s•}Rt.:hurry; Engineer's:.Station.225+00 northerly to Highway Engineer's St.:tich)',,r,... . ..7.,.....:....; .. • • • -'-'-•••:::. •229*74.4 said strip shall be 3X3. feet'.in width being 150.feet wide.,on the:east ride snd 15.0y.i - . ,..,,,:i.„....4....y:„:...-.:s.:•• . ••' ••"; ,..`...,-,'•',.`• . feet.wide on the went'side of said-center.line, AND.EXCEPT that from kiihway.Engine t,e,p. ,....,,,,g. , ..41-•••,„•,1,.,,,•zs.7.•:•-...,:-.• '!.:• ::1 4.:1:".,:', . ttaticn 229+74.4 northerly to the north line of said Parcel PAC said•strip thell.he'. 3-) ....;;;; • A„,,,A:„,....-.,i....iz....:.:: ---:- -• " " ?c,-..-:::.: . . feet in width being 1)0 feet wide•on the cant. aide and1C0 feet vide on the ides t. s:tic. sf•;•;.'...1 . ?,1i.:'...,...::;--,.: • . ': •-• , ?. "..i.:-.:Y• . flp id Ce nt er lines . ::....''.: .--... .';',..••:, • •••• • 7.":...i. •••...,.,- : •-.:••.....',!••• ' ••• .-.•••••••••.::• ' :....• ,: ..,....• .' .• . • .•.:::"..5 .• ::§2! ".-:,.....,, . -. • - • . .. . , • .. • • . ....•-•;-5' RARr.7L "I": That portion of'Government Lot.1:in Section•20,"township' '3 north, Pate;e >...[...6.5. ', '.'..ii'';'-...r.,.' ":;•...,..... • ,:•• ..-.:.• . : ebst, W.M., described•as•tollowst:"..:Segir.nIng.at a.coint ph,t1:e ea-t 13.n,.. •.:.,...41 • ;•%:.:*-'',-.'..• ,... of t VP J. F. Benson County..Road'which is E Otlth 2 5141 314".'Z11::t; 9.:44.11. f,c t:;-:'-: , r.f::::..4".',....•...... -:.•. ,: *:•..-.,..• from the northwest co-ner of said•Ooverrutent.Lot..1;.thence •,,..,-,....t h.,..)•....:.,., wer t:::,..--;;I: . . .. -.....;,Y,;:;-,......:-.1'.'... 224.141 feet; thence South 85'.551 west 98.35 feet to the e as. ell 1 Irs of . '‘.,:,;.,-: • ...,,Y.t:-.:1;.-,:...- . k•:-1: '.., ..7.‘....'?... . . - said road; thence.northerly a's ng saisi road 21.17.70 feet, v.-, the !,:-.":.'. •-..f • - • •• .te;:i.nninc; • • .. . • .•- ' •••- •'•:‘:;'•• .. t.i!'.1...;:.:...':..]. • , . • • • • • • . . . :,. ..:• 'I,.'•.' .. I1 1.LS6, That portion.of eilaid Go7ernment Lot 1 idescrited'as:. fellow. . . zg ....:.n1r.„0 • : .:31-._•,.;:,.....,.. • 1 --- " • '".• ,. ., .,. ,...... . at a feint 10.31 chains east end 21 chairs north:Of....i. ect..i thirtH et.•,%:-.i ,.:-'•c-f!....,:'::,':Al ••., . -.74:,:..g.•,..,..,q....',..,..",,:. .1 .-.-•• •,. - zoic! Go•teressent Lot 1;•thence north 2i chains, thence:sostot.LI.otains; thr.z.i?o:AS -'' . •.,te.::,:::;•.:::,,s s... ec•et.h 2.1 chains; thence.. east Is chair.s to the the point of.teginning;:.•- - s - '.:.:':-.',i,ts ... . 'i:W.:::..-"•:::::'..'..... . . .... . ‘'.'" :•!•:„_,.. :::::. . .- . ,•. . .. .• -:,. • -- g..,-;;-- --.•:.',..:. itI,,Sr), :nat. part of said Government;Lot 1-described-its.•follcss r E:e 0 r.f.i r•e;..*:.....:" Z.7.... . ...f,.....'•..''..'.' t}I northwest•corr.er...of:said Oovernef•nt,Lot..:1;.,,ttence :COI th.0.,i.;5' .r.!:t. .::::.•::.: •...• S._,..:::,:"..;••:. .i• '1.:,''77.1.:,f. fat,•tiv;nito i-tli.'i`:.S..eeset.';.;41£,.146.,'fieti..tlie!'n.,qiicr;.h:,C!2 .I. ve,....t:.•...,.j,3:::-J.4.., ..:.,...,a,A,,....g.k::. -. ,...- -: '...,,4,..:•• ,. ... .. " ,10 ft et.tr the tme Coint:.Of:beginning,•..itienCe!nOrth..).55!.:eas t: 2.6,1s•ff et;•:,..'iZ:',..ifr. *v';•*g`r:?t,=.1••.-.•.. - • • • . ,:-.%•.•1-. . :thence north 0'28i: West-145 feet,; thence `hoUth, 9'..1weiC.,26.4,•••feet.; :.1' s.c.e.-:;Lj'.!..,t.. - •:e•......°---,;::••;',::.,.: - +o•;:th C.171 et 165•feet'.to the;true.point•of.tevinnire,;.:....:. . . . -• .,-.,, • . - 4';•:.7...;.;-,,I... ij..s0, That pstrt of•said Government Lot!l•desCribea:';.as.-folle;rsi••Br•'..nn t.:1;....,.., a . „.,,...al..,,,.. •••;f.,•..• ..;I. : tii: '..'' .. • ..1 1 . . ,•„€„...,I.p. ..;.%;';'. ' • :liF•":',71...P.''' ,..•tt t. :::"ti.:Cf...f.t vern e.r of,syld•GoNTI•p...71 'nt Tot 1;:thecF..se!it..i..c,:.4.4.-,.••.“.,.....1::•;;;;te:1 .5,;:,,,i:.•;;;:.•2,:. . ...,....: '4:,1-!...... ,. .. . . . :east'534.11.feet to the easterly•line of.•the•J ..E.•'''..11°•er.ssOn'tsi.inty.'It::.i::i;..,. ••:';',.!;4:..ts. •i•so,:::s....:-;.:;',' .„... •. -.thew.-•non th 01 7.8, wqs.t;..224..1,1•feet'•to...thel'..!tin oe'..po in t:.is f•.t.er.;I r.fling;• th.en%;:•:..i..??;;".i.l,. . 74',•;,..,ivi..,.... .1 ,..:-.... ,,. • S:Z".:!":".•:-.:."- - . FV:th 0'38'.yes t„..14.5..70•feet; -the no e...,'S.Otitii;:,.F.F.,7:55%.iie ..t...''"i7i;2k.'fi,_e t. to•th,:;:?...1r9., • Or'c're,.:1;?..,.:,... . ' eat torly line cf.saiti'1..5.3d; thence'nOrtberly'along-s:aid,rit4d'152..51- fe':.t.i'.!:::;4 . 01.1r:s •1 . . :. tie su e north 58'.55'..east:58.35- trLe of tegli,nini;;;,...,........404. .: q"...iitp....!:.... ...::.,.. . .: • ••• --. • • ", ...•: • . ••,• • . ...; •••...:•..•.:.... ....,.•. :........,...sji.•,.....,!'..7,-,..,''.....„'„%.••-.-:5.:t:.„,i.,..:•!,,:.4;;;:i:',":"'...i.-.. .Y_•.1.:2?,......;..ii. -•;:'.•;i:,...-'.. s.:7.s2.....:::.;,..,.'•':'.:,...;'i.::::. ..••..;'.....::°41:0 ' . - „.......!.. -• •...,44,.,. ...,: -i.,.. r '• .7.- •- !k•:•,••••,- :-• . ••-•- •••. ..• • : ALSO ..Thai 'pOrtion••Of•said Oirierriment.Lat..-i'deScri):ea'.4f011esiss';•:•17e;irniiVt; - . ..4-• :...*7:., ': .• ...•.•. . ...L.fq,...!".•`Y• •; , .. : .••.•;- .: 'et a 00 5,11t 19.33...chairs epst,andi.,7i:chains:r.orthop;t.t.o.„:1postrhwe.s t..,::corrs.,s. s..t., .,... ,. s.. •,,,f... . .......•• *i::Lt.•••',,.':.,.... •-:-.:•;...........':..,...•.of.said...,lavernrsent.„Lilt 1;:thence west.,Is•'Ch sins;:•.:theiice•iner.i,h:21;.ch cs;3'...;•:•-ir ! - J•eiM-; . • .'' -..'„ .4'.2.-:'!•, ..-- .. • : ••"*: - ! tl:e tic ti.. east h-.ctifriettienee:scilth'2i.•.'chains,.t.o...'ithe-poijni,...ci.t.togi:11,31:14...,.......;: -.4 :. • .t..,..!:;.,,. . -• s. .,... ,_.t..:...:•.1,..• - •- ...- .•• ...-EXCFP r County' :Toad;....;..i ..:% :::.....,:::::.i-:,, ...-7::::.:-..!.e.i....,::;,•;4..:•‘:•:_..1-....,,, .'::••••••:: .',-•:;.- • -'..-......... .4 . • • ..•173'.,,,?.., , - •• - .•••••..,-•• •-...,•:,••••,••,:s.•'.'?..f S,..i."'er.,^1.,,r1i.'?:•'::1'i.4:::"'...1:, .,1....'ct:?..'...,.1..,:„.‘,.. . - . ;Aar:, • • . . . . ....• . . •. . • •••-- ••, ALSO, the east 525 feet 9 fsaid:GovernIte rit,Lot:.:li:.,/,..c,:•::.i-1-,...,...-,:.:!'..?:•.:-;,,!,.,.,•_,..i•.•:-...:.;...;;;I::4 : "•'?'-':•1?-4..j>;;;.! . ',- --.. a• U ' . ALSO, that portion of•said Oovernalent),Lot-....1t.,dcs,cribed:.:ea.c.ollele, ,.... Pt, 11,.. .':"4:- t ...1- i.4 .. 4...__.- .4,:,•: •' • -. ilil.';',•-..--' . 0 . .- .. • . .ping at the..'.,po rthwes t corner'....of..said'....csi#errustnt•Lot,I.;:pt..ence.a..,.t. s.41. ....:.Ass:,i.,..... ..-. .y."-ti;11,:;!" !us ....., . .,... . . . . .:-.1.1'..... 1...7=D 'TS • ..''''.feet;- thence sbuth,260...:.fe et;-.thence.!;nor eastt.1.i:89,..145!,,.' .. .132.1;6..'feit;;I•• ••.!!P ••••,,,•;•-t,F .• •. stg,:it'gf.c;',,.: .. !--,•IL-...c.)g •-."'•s•ou th'IOC':fee t; thence.ssi-Ist 680.116;feet;....thehp#...:FlokpC::: <.•9'•feeb..'t.c.i;.thii:'''.':'•!,...,..;&,'.;-41 . ,• - -akti..=. *:' " .......' '•.,.:.''''::::::5 ..171 F.1„.. ' ' • .-•:'....•point•of.beginning; BXCiTT County.Road, situated,,in the':f.'...i.".tY.*iif..Resy!.••••ti..;-,s1"....',. .,,,... •. • ...z.,,,.....-,,,...• .-'..".':.;,r.... 'Y'41.."•":•".••:--- :-7:),'''•.•• •'• •'-'•::•---•:',::- C.•': ..-.'.:-. s'•"::?:, •7••.:: :...:T.:::.;. '..--;• •:;•• .,.',....;:. .:::!..::•:."-).;:';''...1"-.-;':: :-..':::•-::-..;•;:;••::;-:.....:••••••:.::•.•::-".,••••.--.:(.-•11g. ... .• •: '•:t-. .i..4 . , • •.•:i' tf.-'3•':,.••:" •,* .13-1..,„,: r.•: - ••.::-•. •.!..L.S0-, Lots 1 ard 2..in.Block..7 of Rentoni.,as..per•,:p.lat,..!...co.r.led...1,n....„?.....,-„,•,.„1:...2,, t••••. ... Ett,,.„.:3-s• . ,.•• ... . '',_-,1 . •.••.''''.;' . of'Plats on'•-osze''13q.'.records::of:.sai.d';',Costfity;..,':,:ic:','•;•'•:..Tr:••• :..;:•••••:....:.--:..-..;.....;.•..'.;,..'.•••••;.:,.• ,.-...z..:: ' 4,7-i.. .. . . • ,_. •-e.::...: : '.• ''•-,' ':• • .••.---...'..........,1 ...';.,.. . .• 7.....•• ....:"..":''... -•••'%"•:•",-.-:7;•••••:••-7;!<"%••v,-,:ie•...,,Z*:••..i•Ag,-:..c4.i..,....,,,..1"..•;',.i.:;;:•.".,.7.;", ;'..;:..',•;-;;;;;;•;.:::.;,..1",..:':-.-.:-.i2.8": 1 : . --,:g.,i.:. ,-,.." .1.••••- •• ..,'Z . , •-••..-•.:.. AND ALSO,:all.that portion of.the!...following.,..escribe ‘ ar:ce)........p.:,.3-Y4-.rip.:..."'„,::,Ai..i. ,' . . - ,..-f..tfis:..i, • , ••.. -::- • g24..••••, .....*. ." ••.-.....,,. •. . . within a'Otrip of la nd.150 feet..I nNitith'bei.ne.75.:,feet,71.11-is.d<.so,.n••••eac.h..!..3.de, .::. .: ,,,,,a,:li,. . .•.• __ ..• ,,,•,... . --_..,...:.,,.;-c•-:.,-?.. ...:........... . ••-••••Of:the center.line of Said•Primary.itatelligir.say7,11o..1f'E,.:::,,i.:;'.:.?.''',';',;:-.;•. ;. ,.,! .i.:t'..,,-. ..:Or',...1'.•.:::::L:' .•: I ° , :.-..,....; ,..........-..%.'-:',,_..i., . .'...0...• .. ;•...:-•.1-•': •...-• .......•••:- • •:.,•::' -*'.':'• .......: •-•Y:'....:. -`1.-.•:•:...;"P•,'S...Z-.Tit .-1-.. ';'''.1•::,..'5'.."-'.T .• ...yt".•.‘..-• •!,--''7:7';-'71-': ' •':'' r• :.::, ..„,.., . ..: .i,.. ,....„:„,,,,,......... •.• .; . .„ • ••••, ...:...„..._•. .. ... .,,... •.. .. ...„.: „.,,-„:„.•.,......,•„..:.......„,,,,i....,,,,„,,,„„,.......„,..„..„:„.„,,,,...,...:,...,:,:...„..J..,.........,:.,.........„......„.„,„,,,,„. 7- ":':-.•; '' ' -":-..", .•-."--fi:•'‘:;:•."..r.,7: ..'•;.....-..,.'".-*r.:....: : '....'•;;:*z .."....i.•;2•;•;;.;."...' '4 ••:'!." ...*;.*. ...!';-'..."',..':(;:•:.;,;••..:..: '. . . ",,:•;;;c14 ;: '[:.''.-:-...::,-*.;.._. . ' ....;:f..'"...".:f.' ..'"4 .:..::-..- . ..,1f..*-:.?;..;• •, - •-:•--i'"' ",:''- ?,:i1:,:,.1."•!/,.'...!.,:::?..,r,-;'..-1•-•-•:.' '...;'-;.:•••,;-.':.'.;'.......;•.:•:•:?.. .`-?-'.-••'.- i..--.1,7.: '`".`.."..:-,-,..'''.';::. ...:• :!•!::•.;-4,;::;-;:..'...-,;;,-.; •.' -'' ''' '1?::.. ? :,, '. • •' -'-';'•4'.' •. . * "''•:"... ,..."••' ...W,.."•;?:;•:;."".'•,':',.".•,,":.•.....;.:.......V-. ':. .'22:....,•:1:.,•;':"..: ...." , :.:.'•::• .:•'":.:••••••'; .•...:••••. . ...,....:., ...,./...*e;..,,:,..:, ,,. .....,..‘,..,..,.7,.,,,,:i. :••:4::::.;,:•......,,,.„-;-:„ . :. .. . . :,4,-,...... . • .1 . . .. ..-.....„ '. .,:.i.,-,-••..-- ;:;-..--.4: •••••• -..,•• •=•.,;(i.,-..:;" .- .: .-... ..,.•,.••- ..: ••• -.;•-.,•,.- • -••••... .•,--.-••••, ,,..--...,,..--... 4'-,,,"7,,,'"I 'yet,-,' ' • '"-'i". .','. '''t • ''''?,;.. . -1 ...;,..'.="':-•-.1::::::,-,t'.;..":',"•'' ..:',;',:s1; :. ". **i.i. ':- -' . : ''.;. -.J.''...•,-;;.',. ..:)•±1 .1--1:'.-- ..--.11'.,..,k;.2.* 1 -.11.I'''' :•:.6.-.:::!j;:fiC`.. :12;7 r-'T'. ..::,(.1 ..' -:-'::.-4t:•(-1'''.'.!:e"; ;;-j" •7;:s;•::.;-.•;••••••;.•i•• ....:••.•.:•!:•••;.., •r*?.!;•:,••::-;,•..:::i ,.... .,....:....-...,;-,;•• .;.i.:.•••:,--:.,...-•';':',:•--:7.-.,i.3*•,-.',.',.•47.'1:1-•'-..z.---:• -• '1'ea:-..i:I..."..Z.;.4-t',•,•-i.. ••:.;:,-..-..,,,, ,:....,..-...,.f ,,..:.::q4-;, ; : tsi.?•-.•:!!.. - • •• •- •••• - .-:•: , -••••.:•••'!...••,.• ,.••-,:-.1'. -::,:.,•::•.-..:.,....:•.'::,...,:.,:-....e.-:...,:......--,:•,.•••,,,.... ....:;t.....,-;:.4.,..4-:.:,,:••;-:.;-::-.4•14,,,,,,..,,w4,10:+tv-...,.„-..::7„;,,,T,..,..c.o.:-.v.•:,-..z.!••••-•,..,, .,.....,F,:-..e..,t,:•,-,,,,,,7-, ...4.•..:. •••:;:z.-:-.4.•,•:,. - - ---••-••- . • • • • s t t5PM Q 1 y �j;r i �' .. • I .1 t -'wta809 F.a0.12 • • PARCEL 'b': Lot 1, EXCEPT that portion lying south of a line drawn from . -.., !r'lr: the southwest corner thereof to a point on the east line of said Lot 69.2 feat north of the southeast corner thereof, end ."�. : _,� .f. O that portion of Lot 3, Block 3, Town of Renton, and of Tract T.. 44, Plat No. 1, Renton Cooperative Coal Company's Acre Tracts, • •-%. • t. lying north of a line described as follows: Beginning at n point on the west line of said Lot 3, 25.5 feet north of the :'_,: \4 southwest corner thereof; thence north 89 09' east 80.96 feet; 7 thence south 88°45' east 47.91 feet; thence north 35°33' east 37.90 feet to a point on the east line of said Tract 44 which is 40 feet east and 97 feet north of the southeast corner of f= said Block 3; situate in the City of Renton in said County. ..• F ALSO, That portion of the A. H. Tobin Donation Claim, lying south of the south line of the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Company right of way, east of the line • of the plat of the Town of Renton, as per plat recorded in _ +. , Volume 1 of Plats, page 135, and north of Plat No. 1. Penton Cooperative Coal Company's Acre Tracts, as per plat recorded in Volume 9 of Plats, page 20, records 'f "inc County, EXCEPT -- „•; 't. that portion conveyed to Richard F. Clarke by deed dated �.• • • ' June 30, 1931, filed July 22, 1931, under Auditor's File No. 202322, and recorded in volume 1499 of beeda, rage 434. rern-ds of said County. ;y.' Paget to that certain Road Easement granted by Pet Friend 'f' • ��''` '� •Power .4 Light Company to Cladding, ?'c?ean ', Company under day^ `'.,• of August 20. 1934 and to that certain Road Easement granted t; by i^izet Sound Power R Light Company to :ohm W. 74e1 and :v John Y. Y.yers under date of January 31, 1950• ' F lands being conveyed herein contain an area of 8.4 acres, more or le?s, the r. :;r•-ifi• details concerning: all of which are to be found within that certain rn: - :e location now of record and on file In the office of the :irecti- of c :. nwa r . i tyml.ta, and bearing date of approval September 10, 1957. revised .i*'.4._. ce:u'er -. i457. and the center line of which is also shown of record :n =rrk 1 o'' ',irhwv slats. na,•tes 74 and 75, records of said County. Al:+:•, the ::rantors herein convey and warrant to the state of Yashington all rights of tngrees and egress (including all existing, future or potential easenentr of srce s. light. view and air) to. from and between Primary State Highway Xe. 1. . eo. '-P to Jct. ?SR No. 2 in Renton, and the remainder of said Fareels 1;. ••c: "' and • _ • .' ` : is ex:ressly intended that these covenants. burdens and restrictions sho ll run '. Ott!: tre land and shall forever bind the Grantors, their heirs. successors er is understood that the right of wag hereby conveyed to the Grantee is now cros•,ed _ ele"trtr transmission and/or distribution lines of the Grantor at or near 1,ighw ' =arineer's Station 256/00, and by a major transmission line corridor extending from ..':ewny En,•ineer's Station 22 00 to Station 232/00, upon which several transmission _ end/or distribution lines have been constructed and others are proposed to be con- :,�,,..: strected in the future for use by Grantor'in its electric public utility busines. .. L,- if the -;raptor, its successors or assigns, shall at any time be denied a franchise • .e.. _''t. or right to maintain and operate said existing or future transmission and/or distri- t_on lines across said highway, and if the Grantor on account thereof is compelled te remove any thereof from said highway, or denied the right to construct such future lines across said highway within said corridor, then, in that event, the Grantee `-• ty the acceptance of this conveyance agrees to indemnify the Grantor, its saccessor� or assi,'ns. in the amount which shall be reasonably expended by Oranto- in re- lorating any such lines that it may be.required to remove from said highway. • • • "•� ..Y�. _f. 1 �-•1 _yam• ?i:.` .`;: • j t J ` s •t< , K • tea. •+' ♦ ♦ C d o: :y2-.,.. lr•• •r�. > -a y ♦• •w • . r ..- ✓Al 3' (l9 -'r'.riI to III It is understood and agreed that the delivery of this deed is hereby tender,•d .,rd ,,, :`;:�='Y�t'.`''' that the terms and obligations hereof shall not beceaae binding u^on the St.et.e of :ast•+.ngtc:n unless and until accepted and approved hereon in xritlrg for ttr. 4t-te u'' :•:•,:,. ..,s ;.r.ehiretccr.r [span Af accepHighways, by the Chief Right of Way 4ger.t. Q Dated tM ew; v/c fflifi /f • •:., �' ' O ,fit 'ri 1tl• .. ` ! - •:' , ,,Tf ;t P" FT S0!1NA POWER4 LI)HT C,'P:.Vt .j • a 1� To-, iicr Fr• ' • a 31' Pr �'7 In a , -•ptyd grid atrord'ted`, J`: I�Sd i t.r t j s_ •: • y $TA'1 c G 1{A.S: '':If'. ',,*:,��,.; -.•-m'rtrrr. a( Ri-hw a; 0 ♦ 3 f r/. . vl ti v t R£f oR0£- - :i : . '95841/ -• r r, , .. VOL .._. • • ,. ._ . .. • • ^ PAC£_``"• I ci, ,.....%. ... , . .. • ..........., ::. ,....:.: , , • yM Y • _ RfOUfST pfco Amil . . ., .—.>,<-__. 4--.. 3, ,.... ._ 7 3 :j s' - ' ' - • '[/ r � . • •t. ;CM Ahv!eit vq.e.Vibiok 1;ii:4. :4'.'•►. ".",•7UNr."=•"-t!' v l-ff.v 7 V• xi; t, .+•J•wb•/M+ w ? • • ,via 463U FAGS 646 . • 5r32439• • . . . • QUIT CLAIM DEED LIMITED ACCESS i a p • IN THE HATTER OP Primary State Highway No. 1, Jct. SSH No. 2-H to Jet. PSH No. 2 , In Renton KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That the Grantor, PUGET SOUND POWER & " LIGHT COMPANY, formerly PUGET SOUND TRACTION LIGHT & POWER COMPANY, a + Washington corporation, %i for and in consideration of the sum of'- - TEN AND NO/100 - - ($10.00) Dollars, - and other valuable consideration, conveys and quit claims to the State of Washing- •• to', the following described real estate and any after acquired interest therein, - r, situate in King County, in the State of Washington, to the sam- extent and purpose - as if the rights herein granted had been acquired under Eminent Domain statute of the State of Washington: All that portion of the following described Parcels 1 and 2 lying Southerly and • Easterly of• the following described line: • Beginning at a point on the center line of existing Secondary State Highway No. 5-C at Highway Engineer's Station (hereinafter designated H.E.S.) SSH No. 5-C, 29+50; :;',;.;-' ' thence_Northwesterly in a straight line 50 feet to a point opposite H.E.S. SSH No. 5-C 29+50; thence Southwesterly in a straight line to a point which is 110 feet Northwesterly opposite H.E.S. SSH No. 5-C, 30+00; thence Southwesterly in a straight line to a point opposite.H.E.S. SSH No. 5-C, 32+35 on the West line of Section 20; - thence South along the section line approximately 240 feet to the Talbot Road and the end of this line description. .ALSO, all that portion of the.following described Parcel 3, lying Westerly of ex- r ' isting Secondary State Highway No. 5-C, Southeasterly'of a line drawn parallel with and -126 feet Southeasterly when measured at right angles and/or radially,. from from the center line of Primary State Highway No. 1, Jct. SSH No. 2-M to Jct. PSH F No..2 in Renton, and Easterly of the following described line: •o Beginning at a point on the Southeasterly line of Talbot.Road, 160 feet Westerly, •• . when measured at right angles, from the center line of existing Secondary State . Highway No. 5-C; thence Southerly parallel'with said centerline, to a, point op-' • posite H.E.S. SSH No. 5-C, 36+50; thence Southeasterly in a straight line to.a . point opposite H.E.S. SSH No. 5-C, 38+00 and 90 feet Westerly therefrom; thence - • . • Southerly parallel with said center line to a point opposite H.E.S. SSH No. 5-C . ` . 41+00; thence Southeasterly in a straight line to a point on the Westerly line of said existing Secondary State Highway No. 5-C.gpposite H.E.S. SSH No. 5-C 41+50 and the end of this line description. ` • ALSO, all that portion of the following described Parcel 3,' ,lying Northwesterly of a line drawn parallel with and 120.feet Southeasterly, when measured at right - angles and/or radially, from the center:line-of Primary_State Highway No. 1, Jet. SSH No. 2-M to Jct. PSH No..._2 in Renton; . EXCEPT that from Highway Engineer's Station'216+00 on said center line', said paral lel line shall'be drawn 140 feet Southeasterly therefrom; . ' " ' - EXCEPT any portion above described. . PARCEL 1: .. • ^..'` • d • That portion of'Government Lots.1 and 2 in.Section 20, ', \`Q� .` '�.. '-..,;•;;'. Township 23 North, Range 5 East,'W.H., described as - • \`, • -, •+ '';�i follows: (+ ?•�. • Beginning at a point 1140 feet South of the Northwest �,�Nu�aa r�_: • -„ _•<.l. ..�• �(, corner of said Government Lot '14•thence South.along the ' q���L�.�..- ' `v�P������ • West boundary line of said Section, a distance of 453.27. �l ©F�E�T®� feet, more or less, to.the Westerly'line.of King County. .�1:'r" • �pf� • Road.No. 80 (now known as Talbot Road) :ehence Northeast,. ,- -� �9s� er'y along the Westerly boundary line of said road, a' - .- distance of i05.95 feet to L•point which is North 89°32'41". • - ` East 219.91 feet, more or less,'distant"from the'point of • Li beginning; thence South 89°32'41".West 219.91 feet, more ' . or�lessy to the point of beginning; - _.,_�•.= �• -' i • l<CE�dTIQ(ev fv. • ;i . Sheet 1 of 3 sheets ' , . Parcel 1-558 . ' . W - • • _.__•`• I., r....c.; r'••:=+x.:•.1:•:.:n�tc+q-;.r+°ri�::•;';w�rcLv^.xb-" .,.,. 45 • 3(1 FACE�i47 • PARCEL 2: , That portion of the following described tract lying . Westerly of said Talbot Road and said road extended Northerly merging with J. F. Benson Road (Secondary • State Highway No. 5-C): Beginning at the Southwest corner of Government Lot 1 in Section 20, Township 23 North, Range 5 East,-W.H.; _ - running thence East 416.46 feet; thence North 660 feet; T; thence West 416.46 feet; thence South 660 feet to the point of beginning; • I..EXCEPT portion thereof lying within.the above described Parcel 1; PARCEL 3: • Government Lots 2 and 3 in Section 20, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.H.; . EXCEPT that portion thereof lying Northwesterly of King County Road No. 80 (]mown as Talbot Road); and _ - EXCEPT that portion thereof described as follows: . Beginning at a point 200 feet North 88° East from the 1/16 corner on the west line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 20; running thence South 0°48' East • 778 feet; thence North 88° East 280 feet; thence North 0°!.8' West 778 feet; thence South 88° West 280 feet to the point of beginning. The lands being conveyed and quit claimed herein contain an.area of 2.30 acres, more or less, the specific details concerning all of which are to be-found within that certain map of definite location now of record and on file in the office of the Director of Highways at Olympia, bearing - -•-• date of approval September 10, 1957, revised March 6,•1962, and the center line of which is'also shown of record in Volume 2 of Highway Plats, page 188, records of said County. - . ALSO, the Grantor herein conveys and quit claims to the State•of Wash- ington all rights of ingress and egress (including all existing, future or potential easements ofaccess, light, view and air) to, from and be- tueen Primary State Highway No.'1, Jct. SSH No..2-14 to Jct. PSH No. 2 in ; r'= Renton, and the remainder of said Parcels 1, 2 and 3; . -• EXCEPT that the Grantor reserves the right of.reasonable access to the relocated portion of Secondary State Highway No. 5-C, Northerly of H.E.S SSH No. 5-C 31+00 and Southerly of H.E.S. SSH No. 5-C,36+25. ' It is understood..and•agreed-that the State will•issue to the Company • such permits as may be.necessary to authorize its employees,•:agents, • • or contractors to enter upon the right'of way.of the State, in accord- R once with the plan for ingress and.egreat.designed for said highway, to the extent necessary to the essential maintenance and repair of the .: Company's facilities located within the highway right of way: . . ••.;t • The now existing facilities of the Company shall be permitted •.o remain y° , within the'right of way of_said highway as now located:or'as •.elocated !,,if, in accordance of the construction agreement executed.by the Fatties here- to. Should it become necessary in the future to alter, relocate, or re- ' move any of said facilities from within the right of way by order of the . State, all costs for such alteration, relocation, or removal.shall be borne by the State. . : • fi . • . . • rt ?r- � _ . • ' i Sheet 2 of 3 sheets • " . . ' Parcel 1-558 .... . • Ore • • •- el . ` J .'I I 4• • O• .. rah u r W "i',,y:'.�,�'.3•.. Yyi•Z•4 4y C ,- '''K' : tS a2T .'F^F 1 a ••F"3; '',_..MiY•y.. t4,-, x „� •I.T.t..y14},4t[Z,. s vS:i,F.'F .. J�'r'!*'14,0 Z�.y-/�'' 4 + .- • • , ..�,//r5.. {_•(�i1/wG ft -i� 7aU}. `Y?'. `±:71.. iilf,;#.,' t ,,v�Y6',... Y' `) y.': ',• :.Y` V I 1 yC .t.��+�.`�?t:�, r`[+' x'a.�.`-•',`-` 7°.' Ur1�_!- L�• i'EP"�.i'M}�'�}•'�' P'�:,'�Z�.w L�'Y.:r,;-rC•'• �C •• '. 7�r,}.••i.. •s10 �j 'fh . '�` '•ry,v. -)•'' :n' •C. —:�• :� • • ,'VJ.: '.'.l'r • ,,,Y,t.;,.. "�•✓T'`:.!_•.e'. t ,L'!t_:gY:Yr,,.,,f r�5." J..�.�,1! 1. �.:... 1' .. . ! <.w :c[: :yw-�.n-: 5 f . 4 A.5._., y • • _ • • .. au • It is i:.:.un ers food''and� - . •:r'Ml'tied'�:hereto`.tiat`';�=::;.`' �',• r:-,': _ • . this conveyance shall'.not , : • r .,,•::. hereund .take;.etfect;''anZd t2iat'ric ti ' tiLthe' tne;'sha71::' `'' e..nn Craator berei«ti:has•=b . . •' or ti een;compensated"r.::'.," .. ,;..�':::.::;. .. e:•cost`of`reloca itg ='• •, • .. ' : :'• �.ng':. .,.• taCilities?iii;accordance_;ttith-::.• : '•:'''V. F; , lic_:utility`relocation nt".exe ;; ^. _ mAe- toted,by�;�ttie-parties:hereto,: • ' � It. is � :tea:' '• ,........, �;.,:', 4ths a�...= a .:� under'stood:. r'd e ;.y :: t.5,i:: • � ,•:. `�'Y•9f,=this;doed is 1�; ' kT_:;.: hereby.tendered•and`'that*the`•. tenn'and:obligations;hereof s.�al7:.:. r i✓E: :,: tl not become biirLng'upon.the'State'o£,Washingtgriunless and,until • 4:ri :'•" accepted and a u;; P approved-hereori`in:writt ng for;the State•bf:•Fiashi t� ,. •k::'artre:t of 4in.1H ihtot.•-ay-, ays,•by the:Chief:R • Arent. %; • = • , Dcn .ww t:as i rh Ca., of '�Y f.:; •' x:" • . , ., , • ',*: -;:i.117.TA.T.i.itt SO;1111:"*POI-M''Et.L.DIT:i.` COI?''.1.'-.: • • * ""'-:''' ' •-• - "" .1„,_„..-,..„..... • .... .. • . ...,...„..,.,.:,..... .,, .,:....... . .,.::..„. ...,.. .:.... ........ ....,_ . :.,::,,,,.2:,:,.......:,..: ...:„. ..,..„..„,.._,...,...„. • .. ::.......-. • • . • . . • .. ... ......, .. ..:. ..4.. , uiat,..t. • . Jti'c • residentr• Operations'''• • :Ee 4 e 'f.' Wit' i s +r"20. :•.:S t:r4 . y•M `.'S•li.: - `1:''r'r•' • _k_+j.C.t-.Lis' p,' :r c ,0,-I,- 'ax!n)'1T'4 3 o • i..l6. Y''tj. 1 , • • .. . • • I ,:L . • <��n 4y •Lr,ellti.. : • • : S3 L U• ^4 • • -.Cm. t.Z Q If' :[r.� ':'f•-'i — .SL�'C�:; !'..:,li y s�^ ',..' �•,. • J,, '.ti C -;.� of or - ''" .rs -i'•ay;;",�•: - • ar•l,eared r _• . �i5�•._�. e•a:e4:�rsci:-all�:; - • rF� d,:;:�.:,:•' ` :/,t,LG and f::• .:f.=.ry •• �'•'''••-.•`i '' r,$: ._t :L''.'; :'' .. to a i:ntrir �a-.cp ire G: y. . .,:, v.: � „ice r` ::_:t e ',�;,., lc3^� ^n:that ated4-.t14. regoinE�instri 's; T .:r [i:' ?', _9 maid inst,.�^ient •to •ttcTtfic:; , 1 deec[�tou=, -I; '' oa=d `ree hi d:^�rolur R:ary act` ;Y�; ` • oorro;aior.' .(b^ ;:,. abd,deed..o_.:. °r:. •oat:: state �^ -.,S,�Y• •,:, :1• ..r. ,:vii'cte-tio^o$`•'•;::' -'^;:.. _ d'trtrt �2,Cu - �? �.,'.• .,r R•..d ������:,"::.-<:' ':-,�. r. ant tha the' �? _ _elite.s'aid' <3�;: seal,.aii'i:' ems'-;'t't;:nt:' .., r r$Ea'a1':O }t!, :•,i:' ri rK< - o• r„ ' •p� `s'v 4x• a �I ^!< n r _<U:� >�st ,.,,a �' ,.ELh':.<--..r-:t lks,;A til ''t ':•'4i° .v:"tom`' 'Z`^ , t'rr'. ?:7�:�,�'a'�. ,J. ard:ofPici ,,� a: , �; , k • ,,..,,.-. -- +a �:yk't�";►iiyat:r.r ••w� Y.3 d':�t��� Sy &.D09 r:::i•'.. ..�:5?. Y+e�y{,.�. IAA.. •--i7� "Y�t -r� ,ram`': .u.. ..(.•::'+'! • f r,:.: .. µ'iu_••'1" t 1i ':J:: Y. t' 'i:Srr,.n, •• .r - �'1� ^r a :i .J: 11C. • �':G�a.n� -Fig • • • •rrt*Ve•,i;; nQ• r tC. y •{_ tiL. t +.•S } der AP a r - - 1 • •1... ^7• aosh ;' i �c •:` r V• f -mot r C • •- •�- _ .:w,c�::•[:.rl+ai'A•,fbv.tu,lvli�• vi'J[4•�:'i„'S 1�:iJ•N,i+`ti k• .W::rJi.h:...,:w-1' ._ ... • i.^�- � y• � »c�•tt 1 4�, �r �nrry-�•-:- Q• - .T ''�i lam..-. , W i3w :=Y ,r, ..::i-ter`s t f• ...rC_: ram,,{'! _ >_Y:_ .,., '• -i" .ur i 4 r/1': :y' [ S- • <_f. �N S. •M,:•4i: of°S'.r i_`: .:7::. r!f�.£,;l.R.. :^�`�'� �.1E;5,. .�•"', ram:e+�. :!'du e= � -..;•▪� - .r:�' -:.L�:, ::L- _s, .:S+;: a . `:1^�rrl� .rt:.., �.LZ,^f�;l:�, 1•� :.�:•. Y' �� n: m• .r,. �:-�..-• . :ri,•.C.r _.F':S•:•.'(t''![n'iF. ..T :r1y-. - ' n4 r,; .k`. 'i=. .,�•Y-.T a..•vlr ri' ..a1. �.1:1:,,.,r;.i•': s..+.7p ,+- •t;..,1.. •lr_ 1...� •:) 7,., t. .J..' .Yy,•7.?"i'.5i7". ;):,•.i: :zt';.T,,. •tY,., ,n'i._•. ;'•R1•j, ,'fl$ ,� v .�''i'')"�..":x • • .a.r�i j•:.7,1::1 1 �:"ri .,•c � Y'i' yy a. �l' 1 T Y!, 9- _ t 'O 73 "shr e ''r.:�=r T.�.i.:. .r�: MT -3'', t� t 'v`'',r. � • s n :-"`q •f- ''':v:• fir.:„;'4:i�'',`:1�tA rlla�:it �� s•. ::;� �, �; ..r �1.: .�� :a. J-�- •4 ,;t�-:�<,.;:. - ▪ Yy'� :j�* IA4'! r }:.- - (. f ..}< a �ti. .s TY-,.xi: is .d V`:-=` :.Y='�•5:':: ::iiry� -:�''1, iN: .y .�. L.ti.,r, "a,:=;i'n�:;,iC'�.!.'jw? ,17:7R�.: '''. ' of 0•puhiiu/d 4;3t,;i• ,< .;,1,�tki r y� ,{:.. :;iu��k:�.n.. ,'r: taf. ,�,.�4 <:s "tR z`<' . • y.i:.. _ - ,.,! ���y 1;,J..,Z,IEt•;$':. ,.lt�ii ..i;.r, .a.,.r�'7[{ 'SS�F:.t'-[:'•.aTln'' �.i`.y�_ ,.r.:i.x'..it',',_t,-J.rli„r',jl;rr�� •!.1:� - i; u c5�y. 74'::'. �`fJ..Lr } f: 'n� �,?t: �"" wd',a«l. .Fv '!'•}:.+{ ,.,�.•.t..,.n:. ,..r,:'; +...�.:xe-?k•. y r!G���.•,r .. ,/y �„��'�'�'r'.-', _r1Y� �.fr C°Ill+�r�l�1r►t!:« ":1;fi%' a'y'�<K2r:Y:�f..',"+P;+ 9t,.._....<<}'�:i„' i.I'a2'CO -% bf ,;�r r,'�' Il'`-•' :4 '1r,�r ..S•. .A .Pt',:['W.JI"' I�':7< 1Yy:,.... `o ,.v ;.lSe.if%:' .7..: ;.f• ��.,a.z.v -••ls.y.�. . �,t;,. _ '�1�.,[,<.c::�•r.:3. - ,ri ..r. .. �, •I..•+.':t ,.`:,`:•.1 , y''::. ::t:...y',".:;'�:1. ../1,`:'•,'i[�Y �(.-. .,yam ':. '1• (1 .Y7 ..�`.�i�`urp.�'�-7'7 ).. .h'�^r. Y>!-t.:: ..V:t['", t,�,:� r.l, LLrY + ` A fir: �i,.y.:,�:':' ^•7. :a ti r„r, - T ,i 4L.: :.T Sc--% -�r -i •�a i.r <�rn L .r"' IE4 .5' �i{` x ,s • 1 ;ia.:.., „1-[ 'is- 5 sr '.S: . :BI: Rx;.. ..,},. :'j_1. • DEVELOPMENT PLANNING . CITY OF RENTON ...�....r._.........._... ....... .. p.Dec<c a NOV 0 5 1999 - - . PNB Reference No. 19897 EASEMENT • J` A-7 THIS INI)1rYIURE made this i` day of i4 Y , 1972, between • CDSOUNDPUGET POWER Fi LIGHT ODMFANY, a Washington corpoiation, herein called "Grantor," — and PACIFIC NOrIHWEST BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, a Washington corporation, herein u) called "Grantee," O r- WITNESSETH: That in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable • consideration, in hand paid, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and the per- formance by Grantee of the covenants hereinafter set forth, Grantor hereby grants unto Grantee the following: ' A permanent easement for the installation, construction, operation " m i r r% ., maintenance, inspection; repair, replacement and removal of a man .f 111. vault together with communciations lines enclosed within a concr c •.�,,A. :.4. conduit system under, over, along and across the following dcsc ;,J •r>, 't property: �. %! to 70' .1 parcel of land located in the East 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 0 it 07 L7 :;ortheast 1/4 of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W. :•;. • :,. r. Kin• g County, Washington, described as follows: \`` ;, "C ' Cormencing.at the point of intersection of the southerly boundary of •- Sth Avenue As shown on the plat of Walsworth's First Addition to Renton, recorded in Volume 6 of Plats, page 23, records of King County, Washington, and the existing easterly boundary of Talbot Road, said point being approx- .- imately opposite Station 430+19 of SR 515 as proposed and shown on State Highway Map SR 515, M.P. 5.15 to M.P. 7.22, Renton Vicinity: Carr Road to Grady Way, Right of Way Plan, Sheet 6 of 11 sheets, as approved November • 5, 1971; thence southerly along the existing easterly boundary of Talbot Road a distance of 10 feet to the true point of beginning; thence contin- uing southerly along said easterly boundary a distance of 60 feet;. thence • easterly at right angles to said easterly boundary.a distance of 10 feet; thence northerly parallel to said easterly boundary a distance of 60 feet; ' thence westerly 10.feet, more or less,. to the true point of beginning. . lie rights herein granted arc subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. Grantee agrees to save and hold Grantor harmless front all loss or - damage which may be due to the exercise by Grantee of the rights herein granted and • from all claims for such damage by whomsoever made and to indemnify Grantor for all such loss, damage and claims. • 2. Grantor shall not be liable for any loss or 'damages.to Grantee's. • facilities resulting.from Grantor's use of the lands 'encumbered•by this casement unless such loss or damage is due to a t zgligent act or omission of Grantor. • 3. Grantor.reserves the right to develop and use the lands encumbered by this easement for any purpose not'inconsistent with the rights granted herein. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Grantor reserves the right at any time and from time to time to construct or reconstruct electric lines . (whether AC or DC; whether now existing or hereafter to be constructed) .on lands . adjacent to this easement in such manner that wires:and other related structures. • • may overhang or project into'the air over, along and across the lands encumbered by this easement. . 4. Grantor 'reserves. the right to grant access rights to others along or across the lands encumbered by this eases nt and/or any other.right which is ' not inconsistent with the rights herein granted to Grantee. • '`i W �1 i.• 17 i":..�� • EXCEPTION No. (� PA CCU:I- S. 5. Grantee agrees to provide adequate drainage to prevent any backup of surface water over Grantor's right of way or adjacent land which may result from Grantee's exercise of said easement. 6. Should the easement area be subsequently improved, Grantee agrees ' ;_. that it shall, at its sole cost and expense, replace or restore to its original 0, condition any such improvements which are damaged or destroyed as the result of "7 Grantee's exercise of the rights herein. r` 7. Grantee agrees that said comirurrications•lines and concrete conduit - ushall be buried at least three (3) feet below the.natural surface of the ground (-Q at all points, that the manhole shall be installed in such manner that no portion N of such manhole facility shall extend.more than two (2) inches above the natural • surface.of the ground; and that excavated"areas shall be restored to their orig- • inal grade. Grantee further agrees that•should the elevation of the ground surface be raised in connection with any future development of the easement area and adjacent property, Grantee shall, without unreasonable delay, install risers at its tb such , and risers own shall not cost project maintain above' thelfinished grade adjacentole fto1such.manholksuch • facility. • 8. Grantee agrees that should there be any material excavated from Grantor's property which is in excess of,the amount required to restore the surface to its original grade, such excess material shall be removed. . • 9. • No assignment- of the privileges and benefits accruing to the Grantee - hereunder, by operation of law or otherwise, shall be valid without the prior written consent of the Grantor. • • 10. The rights and obligations of the parties shall inure•to the benefit of and be binding upon their respective successors and assigns. 11. The rights hereby granted shall cease and determine Whenever Grantee shall'have permanently abandoned.the use of its facilities accommodated by this casement. . PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY • Bya1 .'r ,,,,.!e::t2...:401.....4.0.1.4.1Y er, al tate Division . • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss.• - •COUNPY OF.KING . ) ' 1972 before me, the undersigned, On this // day of > personally•appeared LESLIE A.'D0� to m^ known to be the Manager, Real Estate Division of PUGET SOUND.POWER'f, LIGHT COMPANY, the corporation, that. executed the foregoing_ instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and • voluntary act and deed of said.corporation, for the uses •and purposes therein • mentioned, .and on oath stated that'he is authorized-to execute the said instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day 'arid year first • above written. - Notary P is in tor the State'o Cie ;ngg��i1;•., �;rctie sue,:?:. . residing t c�c-�- '_ J fs . - 2 - q /5/ ( ) I � 1 Pt 1 1 � I II £i� , ,71 - - -® THE TRANSPO GROUP , , 1 1 �- 1 1 I I I I I I I I , I I 1 1 APPENDICES' I , for I Renton Home Depot; I I 1 I I I 1 , I Prepared for:, I Home Depot USA, Inc.', t I I , I November 4, 1999 I I I ' I I I I I I , I I l_ , I I I I I I , , I I, _ I I I I I I I ( - I , I 1 1_ A- I r-, Appendix A Intersection Level of Service Worksheets AM and PM Peak Hour S Grady Way & Rainier Ave S (SR 167) 1999 Existing AM Peak Hour Lanes,Volumes,Timings N Li DI Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 11 fj r III 4,T 11 ++T 1 +41. Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 400 0 500 0 200 0 300 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Fit Protected 0.850 0.978 0.850 0.944 0.850 0.969 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow(prot) 1530 3220 1369 3539 3629 0 1752 5174 0 1719 5233 0 Frt Perm. 0.850 0.974 0.826 0.935 0.826 0.964 0.826 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 1 Satd. Flow(perm) 1530 3220 1369 3539 3629 0 1752 5174 0 1719 • 5233 0 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Volume(vph) 110 190 170 735 835 145 445 965 575 95 685 180 1 _ Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 50 50 50 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 18% 18% 18% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 5% 5% 5% i Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 Adj. Flow(vph) 120 207 185 799 908 158 484 1049 625 103 745 196 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.03 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.10 1.10 Lane Group Flow(vph) 120 217 185 823 1119 0 484 1842 0 103 1036 0 Perm or Prot? Prot Pm+Ov Prot Prot Prot Phase Number 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Phase Lagging? Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Can Lead or Lag? Maximum Split(s) 13 21 34 42 37 51 14 28 Maximum Split(%) 11% 18% 28% 35% 31% 43% 12% 23% Minimum Split(s) 8 20 8 20 8 20 8 20 Yellow Time (s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Lost Time(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.08 0.15 0.43 0.26 0.33 0.28 0.40 0.09 0.21 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 128 483 593 914 1179 496 2070 158 1090 V/C Ratio 0.94 0.45 0.31 0.90 0.95 0.98 1.13dr 0.65 0.95 V/S Ratio Prot 0.08 0.09 0.23 0.28 0.06 1 V/S Ratio Perm 0.07 0.05 0.31 0.36 0.20 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 41.6 35.3 15.5 32.7 30.0 32.4 25.5 40.0 35.6 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.27 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 44.4 0.5 0.1 8.5 11.4 25.3 3.8 6.3 12.2 Webster's St Delay 86.0 35.8 15.6 37.4 49.5 57.7 29.3 46.3 47.9 - LOS F DCDE E D E E Maximum Green (s) 9 17 30 38 33 47 10 24 Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP-P3000S\Synchro\AMExist.sy5 S Grady Way & Rainier Ave S (SR 167) 1999 Existing AM Peak Hour Lanes,Volumes,Timings LIHLIOLIMLIEILILSMLJ Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Initial (s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Recall Mode None Coord None Coord None None None None Walk Time(s) 5 5 5 5 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11 11 11 11 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Natural Cycle: 120 Offset: 73 (61%), Referenced to phase 2-EBT and 6-WBT, Start of Green Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 12 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.86 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.96 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay:41.1 Intersection LOS: E dr Defacto Right Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a right lane. Splits and Phases: S Grady Way& Rainier Ave S(SR 167) 4- 1 —3a 2 .1 13 14 I 1 1” '' {:'3:"'^J,O„.V?'t... '01, _ Vn3\ q�3Y�' *s. Sw Vs,*. 1, fib. edl M -1 '5 F 6 1 18 147 Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRAN SP-P3 000 S\Synchro\AMExist.sy 5 S Grady Way & Talbot Rd S 1999 Existing AM Peak Hour Lanes,Volumes,Timings LIHWLJOIDLIIDLINMO Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT' WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 44 r 'i T In +i„ 1 ++ r Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 200 300 200 0 300 0 200 200 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Frt Protected 0.850 0.994 0.850 0.976 0.850 0.850 FIt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow(prot) 1703 3585 1524 3438 3594 0 3574 3657 0 1752 3689 1568 Frt Perm. 0.826 0.993 0.826 0.972 0.826 0.826 i Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 1703 3585 1481 3438 3594 0 3574 3657 0 1752 3689 1524 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Volume(vph) 20 255 120 175 570 25 1235 1035 200 15 75 25 I Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 50 50 50 50 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 6% 6% 6% 5% 5% 5% 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% 3% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) 21 268 126 184 600 26 1300 1089 211 16 79 26 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.03 1.05 1.05 1.03 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.00 Lane Group Flow(vph) 21 281 126 190 657 0 1339 1365 0 16 83 26 Perm or Prot? Prot Pm+Ov Prot Prot Prot Pm+Ov Phase Number 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Phase Lagging? Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Can Lead or Lag? Maximum Split(s) 8 27 15 34 58 70 8 20 Maximum Split(%) 7% 23% 13% 28% 48% 58% , 7% 17% Minimum Split(s) 8 20 8 20 8 20 8 20 Yellow Time (s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.04 0.20 0.66 0.10 0.26 0.46 0.56 0.04 0.14 0.18 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 71 717 995 344 928 1638 2042 73 523 281 V/C Ratio 0.30 0.39 0.13 0.55 0.71 0.82 0.67 0.22 0.16 0.09 V/S Ratio Prot 0.01 0.06 0.06 0.37 0.01 0.00 j V/S Ratio Perm 0.08 0.03 0.18 0.37 0.02 0.01 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 42.4 31.6 2.9 39.1 30.7 21.4 14.2 42.2 34.3 16.4 Platoon Factor 1.19 1.03 0.56 1.00 0.78 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 Incr. Delay, d2 0.7 0.2 0.0 1.5 1.7 2.4 0.6 0.3 0.0 0.0 Webster's St Delay 51.0 32.9 1.6 40.6 25.6 23.8 14.8 42.5 34.4 15.5 LOS E D A E D C B E D C Maximum Greeri(s) 4 23 11 30 54 66 4 16 Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRAN SP-P3 000 S\Synchro\AMEx ist.sy5 S Grady Way & Talbot Rd S 1999 Existing AM Peak Hour Lanes,Volumes,Timings El LI LI ID IS LJ 11 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Initial (s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Recall Mode None Coord None Coord None None None None Walk Time(s) 5 5 5 5 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11 11 11 11 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Natural Cycle: 100 Offset: 10(8%), Referenced to phase 2-EBT and 6-WBT, Start of Green Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 12 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.59 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.66 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 22.2 Intersection LOS: C Splits and Phases: S Grady Way&Talbot Rd S 2 ,I, 4 :+yl,�*'v :€%•xsd,§''s:'�:"l +IsG:aw;fy,:+"" y.,..::t' ,�F,",..'`` �'o`>a:°'�;;•�,;:..P:C' t1ky... 3 i` t�� a:�Yr-.'''�'•`sa'�e',.r.;,�, xh.!'.'F.,,F,.*<."i�...:� . �.;.t••fix ..�r . 7 ; h EP ` ti N114:z A iP .Tt�: •d': c�Aja�-W(fi 9�r'�.? :,z'..?3�A,!}•F�..{,F..¢'k.:r'�,$` •;.�>.. :a5?V'Sr TM ;aM0y z. �Y d.r°y;•.y�`"''i:?4; • �� i:3 Zz —1' 5 6 7 Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRAN SP-P3 000 S\Synchro\AMExist.sy5 S Grady Way & Main Av S 1999 Existing AM Peak Hour Lanes,Volumes,Timings LIBLIEIDDIE Lane Group EBL EBT EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations vvyr + 1, r Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Frt Protected 0.990 0.850 0.919 0.850 FIt Protected 0.955 0.950 Satd. Flow(prot) 3296 0 0 0 1900 1679 1553 Frt Perm. 0.990 0.850 0.919 0.850 Flt Perm. 0.955 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 3296 0 0 0 1900 1679 1553 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Volume (vph) 285 0 20 0 765 115 505 Conti. Peds. (#/hr) 50 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.90 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles(%) 9% 9% 9% 0% 0% 4% 4% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) 310 0 22 0 832 125 549 Lane Util. Factor . 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.05 Lane Group Flow(vph) 349 0 0 0 832 284 423 Perm or Prot? Prot Perm Perm Free Phase Number 2 2 8 4 Phase Lagging? Can Lead or Lag? Maximum Split(s) 31 31 59 59 Maximum Split(%) 34% 34% 66% 66% Minimum Split(s) 8 20 20 20 Yellow Time(s) 4 4 4 4 Lost Time(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.31 0.62 0.62 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 1025 1182 1045 1553 V/C Ratio 0.34 0.70 0.27 0.27 V/S Ratio Prot 0.11 V/S Ratio Perm 0.44 0.17 0.27 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 18.1 8.7 5.9 0.0 Platoon Factor 0.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 0.1 1.3 0.0 0.0 Webster's St Delay 12.3 10.0 5.9 0.0 LOS B B B A Maximum Green (s) 27 27 55 55 Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP.P3000S\Synchro\AMExist.sy5 , I S Grady Way & Main Av S 1999 Existing AM Peak Hour Lanes,Volumes,Timings El LIEDILIE Lane Group EBL EBT EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Minimum Initial (s) 4 4 4 4 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 Recall Mode Coord Coord None None Walk Time (s) 5 5 5 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11 11 11 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Natural Cycle: 65 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2-EBTL, Start of Green Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.54 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.58 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 7.6 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: S Grady Way& Main Av S 2 4 :.k >. ;..a • • Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP-P3 000S\Synchro\AMExist.sy5 HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 .1f G WIL AM.HCO Page 1 The TRANSPO Group 11730 - 118th Avenue NE Suite 600 Kirkland, WA 98034-3737 - Ph: (425) 621-3665 Streets : (N-S) Williams Avenue (E-W) Grady Way Major Street Direction EW Length of Time Analyzed 60 (min) Analyst KLJ Date of Analysis 10/19/99 Other Information Existing 1999 AM Peak Hour. Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----No. Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 ' 0 0 0 1 0 < 1 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 525 540 20 250 PHF . 9 . 9 . 9 . 9 Grade 0 0 0 MC' s (%) SU/RV' s (o) CV' s (o) PCE' s 1 . 10 1 . 10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5 . 50 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5 .50 2 . 60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6 .50 3 . 30 Left Turn Minor Road 7 . 00 3 .40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1f G WIL AM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1 : RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 300 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 976 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 976 Prob. of Queue-Free State : 0 . 69 Step 4 : LT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 1183 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 186 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 1 . 00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 1 . 00 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 1 . 00 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 186 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) SB L 24 186 22 . 2 0 .4 D 6 . 6 SB R 306 976 > Intersection Delay = 1 .3 sec/veh HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1f G RCH AM.HCO Page 1 The TRANSPO Group 11730 - 118th Avenue. NE Suite 600 Kirkland, WA 98034-3737 Ph: (425) 621-3665 Streets : (N-S) City Hall Driveway (E-W) Grady Way Major Street Direction EW Length of Time Analyzed 60 (min) Analyst KLJ Date of Analysis 10/19/99 Other Information Existing 1999 AM Peak Hour. Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----No. Lanes 0 2 < 0 1 2 0 0 > 0 < 0 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 415 110 100 465 20 15 PHF . 9 . 9 . 9 . 9 . 9 . 9 Grade 0 0 0 MC' s (o) SU/RV' s (o) CV' s (o) PCE' s 1 .10 1 . 10 1 . 10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5 . 50 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5 .50 2 . 60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6 .50 3 .30 Left Turn Minor Road 7 . 00 3 .40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1f GRCH AM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1 : RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 292 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 985 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 985 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0 . 98 Step 2 : LT from Major Street WB EB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 583 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 834 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 834 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0 . 85 Step 4 : LT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 1150 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 195 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0 . 85 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0 . 85 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0 . 85 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 166 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 950 Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) NB L 24 166 > 262 16 .4 0 . 6 C 16 .4 NB R 19 985 > WB L 122 834 5 .1 0 . 6 B 0 . 9 Intersection Delay = 1 . 0 sec/veh 1 ' HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1f GWEL AM.HCO Page 1 The TRANSPO Group 11730 - 118th Avenue NE Suite 600 Kirkland, WA 98034-3737 Ph: (425) 621-3665 Streets : (N-S) Wells Avenue (E-W) Grady Way Major Street Direction EW Length of Time Analyzed 60 (min) Analyst KLJ Date of Analysis 10/19/99 Other Information Existing 1999 AM Peak Hour. Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----No. Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 < 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 105 305 505 5 PHF . 9 . 9 . 9 . 9 Grade 0 0 MC' s (%) SU/RV' s (%) CV' s (%) PCE' s 1 . 10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5 .50 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5 .50 2 . 60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6 . 50 3 . 30 Left Turn Minor Road 7. 00 3 .40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 .1f G_WEL AM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 2 : LT from Major Street WB EB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 567 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 851 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 851 Prob. of Queue-Free State : 0 . 85 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) EB L 129 851 5 . 0 0 . 6 A 1. 3 Intersection Delay = 0 . 6 sec/veh S Grady Way & Rainier Ave S (SR 167) 1999 Existing PM Peak Hour Lanes,Volumes,Timings LJ Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ' ft r )111 +1+ 111 ill, 'I 'Hi Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 400 0 500 0 200 0 300 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Frt Protected 0.850 0.970 0.850 0.942 0.850 0.980 0.850 FIt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow(prot) 1752 3689 1568 3505 3564 0 1752 5163 0 1752 5407 0 Frt Perm. 0.850 0.966 0.826 0.933 0.826 0.977 0.826 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 1752 3689 1568 3505 3564 0 1752 5163 0 1752 5407 0 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Volume (vph) 265 725 500 730 405 100 140 580 365 220 1200 180 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 50 50 50 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles(%) 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) 282 771 532 777 431 106 149 617 388 234 1277 191 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.03 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.10 1.10 Lane Group Flow(vph) 282 810 532 800 564 0 149 1106 0 234 1615 0 Perm or Prot? Prot Pm+Ov Prot Prot Prot Phase Number 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Phase Lagging? Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Can Lead or Lag? Maximum Split(s) 33 33 31 31 16 32 24 40 Maximum Split(%) 28% 28% 26% 26% 13% 27% 20% 33% Minimum Split(s) 8 20 8 20 8 20 8 20 Yellow Time (s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.25 0.25 0.36 0.23 0.23 0.11 0.24 0.18 0.31 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 438 922 562 818 832 190 1248 307 1667 V/C Ratio 0.64 0.88 0.95 0.98 0.68 0.79 1.16dr 0.76 0.97 V/S Ratio Prot 0.16 0.10 0.23 0.09 0.13 V/S Ratio Perm 0.22 0.24 0.16 0.21 0.30 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 30.6 32.9 26.7 34.7 31.8 39.6 33.4 35.8 31.1 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.84 1.24 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 2.3 6.9 18.5 19.6 1.6 12.8 5.7 7.3 11.4 Webster's St Delay 32.8 39.8 45.3 48.9 41.2 52.4 39.1 43.1 42.5 LOS D D E E E E D E E Maximum Green (s) 29 29 27 27 12 28 20 36 Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP-P3 000 S\Synchro\PMExi st.sy5 S Grady Way & Rainier Ave S (SR 167) 1999 Existing PM Peak Hour Lanes,Volumes,Timings Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Initial (s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Recall Mode None Coord None Coord None None None None Walk Time (s) 5 5 5 5 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11 11 11 11 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Natural Cycle: 120 Offset: 31 (26%), Referenced to phase 2-EBT and 6-WBT, Start of Green Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 12 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.87 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.96 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay:42.3 Intersection LOS: E dr Defacto Right Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a right lane. Splits and Phases: S Grady Way&Rainier Ave S (SR 167) , 1 —y2 41 3 ,y i4 'a.i$\.s .!x?d;,=3` 33 4 •.k: 6 ,Al :4,,'�� )°0 Pz , b:F ! •:1 7„4 i';c..r•.. , i•: ..t;, ' 04 >,`s.: •• ...;ice.... :: 5 tls 1 1 8 A7 Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP-P3 000S\Synchro\PMExist.sy5 S Grady Way & Talbot Rd S 1999 Existing PM Peak Hour Lanes,Volumes,Timings ID Li LI LI E Ll El N W ? Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 'S f4 r +i 1111 410 'I ft r Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 200 300 200 0 300 0 200 200 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Frt Protected 0.850 0.998 0.850 0.946 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow(prot) 1770 3725 1583 3505 3682 0 3539 3491 0 1787 3762 1599 Frt Perm. 0.826 0.998 0.826 0.937 0.826 0.826 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 1770 3725 1539 3505 3682 0 3539 3491 0 1787 3762 1554 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Volume (vph) 65 615 575 315 495 5 320 285 160 25 640 55 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 50 50 50 50 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) 73 691 646 354 556 6 360 320 180 28 719 62 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.03 . 1.05 1.05 1.03 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.00 Lane Group Flow(vph) 73 726 646 365 590 0 371 525 0 28 755 62 Perm or Prot? Prot Pm+Ov Prot Prot Prot Pm+Ov Phase Number 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Phase Lagging? Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Can Lead or Lag? Maximum Split(s) 13 48 19 54 22. 44 9 31 Maximum Split(%) 11% 40% 16% 45% 18% 37% 8% 26% Minimum Split(s) 8 20 8 20 8 20 8 20 Yellow Time (s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Lost Time(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.08 0.38 0.53 0.13 0.43 0.16 0.34 0.05 0.23 0.32 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 148 1397 828 467 1565 560 1193 89 878 496 V/C Ratio 0.49 0.52 0.78 0.78 0.38 0.66 0.44 0.31 0.86 0.13 V/S Ratio Prot 0.04 0.12 0.10 0.10 0.02 0.01 V/S Ratio Perm 0.19 0.29 0.16 0.15 0.20 0.03 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 40.0 22.1 10.4 38.2 17.9 36.1 23.2 41.8 33.5 12.8 Platoon Factor 0.94 0.93 1.07 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.01 Incr. Delay, d2 2.1 0.3 3.4 5.7 0.1 2.0 0.2 0.7 6.1 0.0 Webster's St Delay 39.7 20.9 14.5 43.9 17.8 38.1 23.4 42.5 39.6 12.8 LOS D C - B E C D C E D B Maximum Green (s) 9 44 15 50 18 40 5 27 Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP-P3000S\Synchro\PMExist.sy5 S Grady Way &Talbot Rd S 1999 Existing PM Peak Hour Lanes,Volumes,Timings El al' [:=1 IDHLIELIONFIE Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Initial,(s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Recall Mode • None Coord None Coord None None None None Walk Time (s) 5 5 5 5 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11 11 11 11 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Natural Cycle: 75 Offset: 58 (48%), Referenced to phase 2-EBT and 6-WBT, Start of Green Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated ' Lost Time: 12 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.72 Intersection V/C!Ratio: 0.80 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 27.1 Intersection LOS: D Splits and Phases: S Grady Way&Talbot Rd S 42 Ad4 E7 3 y :,s `'�;-�sI?�f a• •e�.:y;,�tg:`x',s�*z'�.*:;YBt '�`� '"�:9g, A'•t�<.; �:': " ,;.7?.�q`:x.`,t<?z•, •� "�;.�"• z,.-- ._ &.t, •: :`e;.;fa,, CP4: :^.. 4 }'« 4s.. >. :� ..�;, .,`� A?<:,aYg�'-b:: ... X:<.. � "a..c�. ': ... :ii+.�F? ., a'X._.,� �":�;::�z �;�'•f"i`,s. }.,. +�k"" _.. .. 9' 5 C— 6' 7 8 • Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRAN SP-P3 000 S\Synchro\PMExist.sy5 _ . i S Grady Way & Main Av S 1999 Existing PM Peak Hour Lanes,Volumes,Timings I Lane Group ; EBL EBT EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations V it I, r Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Frt Protected , 0.976 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.960 0.950 Satd. Flow(prot) 3457 0 0 0 1881 1863 1583 Frt Perm. 1 0.976 0.850 0.850 FIt Perm. 0.960 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 3457 0 0 0 1881 1863 1583 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Volume (vph) 1 615 0 115 0 290 865 685 Confl. Peds. (#/l.r) 50 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.90 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Growth Factor I 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles;(%) 3% 3% 3% 1% 1% 2% 2% Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) 634 0 119 0 299 892 706 Lane Util. Factor 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.05 Lane Group Flow(vph) 791 0 0 0 299 937 741 Perm or Prot? i Prot Perm Perm Free Phase Number 1 2 2 8 4 Phase Lagging?, Can Lead or Lag? Maximum Split(s) 30 30 60 60 Maximum Split(%) 33% 33% 67% 67% . Minimum Split(s) 8 20 20 20 Yellow Time (s) 4 4 4 4 Lost Time(s) 1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 - g/c Ratio 0.30 0.63 0.63 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 1037 1191 1180 1583 V/C Ratio 1 0.76 0.25 0.79 0.47 V/S Ratio Prot , 0.23 V/S Ratio Perm ' 0.16 0.50 0.47 Critical LG? ' Yes Yes Uniform Delay, di 21.7 5.5 9.2 0.0 Platoon Factor 1 0.83 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 1 2.4 0.0 2.7 0.2 Webster's St Delay 20.4 5.5 11.9 0.2 - LOS C B B A Maximum Green;(s) 26 26 56 56 Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP=P3 000S\Synchro\PMExist.sy5 I I i S Grady Way & Main Av S 1999 Existing PM Peak Hour Lanes,Volumes,Timings EIBEJLJIDLJE Lane Group EBL EBT EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Minimum Initial (s) 4 4 4 4 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 • Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 Recall Mode Coord Coord None None Walk Time (s) 5 5 5 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11 11 11 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Natural Cycle: 55 Offset: 4 (4%), Referenced to phase 2-EBTL, Start of Green Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.73 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.78 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 10.5 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: S Grady Way& Main Av S 12 4, 14 ';Y="- •I. 'fits,a?i"t� �.i„ x',. �.x., - .. - a•;c-:., r. %`..�`z� ...� •-� s `'„'�•^:'. R d `� „'' �.�� .�.a wy,�� ..c{p+��C�'?�y'.�, 3 r 1- ha s ,`, . ', fir. . �'°1`:.� y _1 ? �` ? ' �i"X~ry &e.:-x<,°N'?i?,�;::wqr � .�!n j8 Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRAN SP-P3 000 S\Synchro\PMExist.sy5 HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 .1f G WILPM.HCO Page 1 The TRANSPO Group • 11730 - 118th Avenue NE Suite 600 Kirkland, WA 98034-3737 Ph: (425) 621-3665 Street : (N-S) Williams Avenue (E-W) Grady Way Major Street Direction EW Lengthiof Time Analyzed 60 (min) Analyst KLJ Date of Analysis 10/19/99 Other Information Existing 1999 PM Peak Hour. • Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 < 1 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 785 420 40 535 PHF . 9 . 9 . 9 . 9 Grade 0 0 0 MC' s (61) SU/RV' s (o) CV' s (0 PCE ' s 1. 10 1 .10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle; Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5 . 50 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5 . 50 2 . 60 Through' Traffic Minor Road 6 . 50 3 . 30 Left Turn Minor Road 7 . 00 3 .40 HCS: Uisignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1f G WIL PM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 234 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1054 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1054 Prob. of Queue-Free State : 0 .38 Step 4 : LT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 1339 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 147 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 1. 00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 1. 00 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 1. 00 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 147 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 9 5, Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) SB L 48 147 36 .2 1 . 5 E 10 . 8 SB R 653 1054 > Intersection Delay = 3 . 5 sec/veh HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1f GRCH_PM.HCO Page 1 The TRANSPO Group 11730 7 118th Avenue NE Suite 600 Kirkland, WA 98034-3737 Ph: (425) 621-3665 Streets : (N-S) City Hall Driveway (E-W) Grady Way Major Street Direction EW Length of Time Analyzed 60 (min) Analyst KLJ Date of Analysis 10/19/99 Other Information Existing 1999 PM Peak Hour. Two-way; Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----No. Lanes 0 2 < 0 1 2 0 0 > 0 < 0 0 0 0 Stop/Yi,eld N N Volumes 815 20 15 500 85 85 PHF . 9 . 9 . 9 . 9 . 9 . 9 Grade 0 0 0 MC' s (o) SU/RV' s (%) CV' s (%) PCE' s 1 . 10 1 . 10 1 . 10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle. Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5 . 50 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5 . 50 2 . 60 Through: Traffic Minor Road 6 . 50 3 .30 Left Turn Minor Road 7 . 00 3 .40 ii HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1f GRCH PM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1 : RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 464 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 806 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 806 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0 . 87 Step 2 :; LT from Major Street WB EB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 928 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 544 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 544 Prob. of Queue-Free State : 0 . 97 Step 4 : LT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 1490 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 118 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0 . 97 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0 . 97 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0 . 97 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 114 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 950 Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) NB L 103 114 > 200 229 . 7 17. 8 F 229 . 7 NB R 103 806 > WB L 19 544 6 . 9 0 . 0 B 0 .2 Intersection Delay = 25 . 8 sec/veh HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1f G WELPM.HCO Page 1 The TRANSPO Group 11730 - 118th Avenue NE Suite 600 Kirkland, WA 98034-3737 Ph: (425) 621-3665 Streets : (N-S) Wells Avenue (E-W) Grady Way Major Street Direction EW Length of Time Analyzed 60 (min) Analyst KLJ Date of Analysis 10/19/99 Other Information Existing 1999 PM Peak Hour. Two-way, Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----No. Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 < 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N N Volumes! 180 730 675 10 PHF . 9 . 9 . 9 . 9 Grade 0 0 MC' s (%;) SU/RV' s (%) CV' s (%) PCE' s 1 . 10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5 .50 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5 . 50 2 . 60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6 . 50 3 . 30 Left Turn Minor Road 7 . 00 3 .40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 .1f G WELPM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 2 : LT from Major Street WB EB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 761 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 669 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 669 Prob. of Queue-Free State : 0 . 67 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) EB L 220 669 8 . 0 1 . 7 B 1 . 6 Intersection Delay = 0 . 9 sec/veh 1 S Grady Way & Rainier Ave S (SR 167) 2001 Without-Project AM Peak Hour Lanes,Volumes,Timings L . -e LA Lane Group 1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ii ft r vivi +T 11 1 + Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) I 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade(%) ' 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length;,(ft) 400 0 500 0 200 0 300 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Frt Protected j 0.850 0.978 0.850 0.943 0.850 0.967 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow(prot) 1530 3220 1369 3539 3629 0 1752 5163 0 1719 5222 0 Frt Perm. 1 0.850 0.974 0.826 0.933 0.826 0.962 0.826 Flt Perm. ! 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 1530 3220 1369 3539 3629 0 1752 5163 0 1719 5222 0 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Volume (vph) 1 115 200 180 830 885 155 470 1025 635 100 685 190 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 50 50 50 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor I 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles I1(%) 18% 18% 18% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 5% - 5% 5% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) 125 217 196 902 962 168 511 1114 690 109 745 207 Lane Util. Factoi• 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.03 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.10 1.10 Lane Group Flow(vph) 125 228 196 929 1186 0 511 1984 0 109 1048 0 Perm or Prot? Prot Pm+Ov Prot Prot Prot Phase Number ; 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Phase Lagging?! Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Can Lead or Lag? Maximum Split(s) 13 22 34 43 37 51 13 27 Maximum Split(%) 11% 18% 28% 36% 31% 43% 11% 23% Minimum Split(s) 8 20 8 20 8 20 8 20 Yellow Time(s) i 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Lost Time(s) , 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.08 0.16 0.44 0.26 0.33 0.28 0.40 0.08 0.20 , Lane Grp Cap(vph) 128 510 605 914 1210 496 2065 143 1044 V/C Ratio ! 0.98 0.45 0.32 1.02 0.98 1.03 1.25dr 0.76 1.00 V/S Ratio Prot . 0.08 0.09 0.26 0.29 0.06 V/S Ratio Perm i 0.07 0.05 0.33 • 0.38 0.20 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 41.7 34.7 15.2 33.8 30.1 32.7 26.7 40.9 36.4 Platoon Factor I, 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.82 1.22 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 ! 55.2 0.4 0.1 26.9 16.0 39.2 8.9 13.8 22.2 Webster's St Delay 96.9 35.2 15.3 54.7 52.6 71.9 35.5 54.7 58.7 LOS j F D C E E F D E E Maximum Green!(s) 9 18 30 39 33 47 9 23 - Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP=P300DS\Synchro\AM2001 Without.sy5 -I - I S Grady Way & Rainier Ave S (SR 167) 2001 Without-Project AM Peak Hour Lanes,Volumes,Timings 1 ,�_p 1 ,�� W>�J O ...- F LJ ® LJ f. r9 51�6/ Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Initial (s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. Time To Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Recall Mode None Coord None Coord None None None None Walk Time(s) 5 5 5 5 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11 11 11 11 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Natural Cycle: 140 Offset: 73 (61%), Referenced to phase 2-EBT and 6-WBT, Start of Green Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 12 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.90 Intersection V/CI Ratio: 1.00 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 49.2 Intersection LOS: E dr Defacto Right Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a right lane. Splits and Phases: S Grady Way & Rainier Ave S (SR 167) � 2 3 J �4 a..;:6 i:'1::it#,, i ...� ice.i:... ., .. .k � � ..�1�. .� .��� .g •:{7"•''i"� �°!"i� ' �%n"" :•jE'4}.< �y:: ii: ti "'.'+3�». V�" ' s.Y.,'�r` Y, ::2w �^�^c, .�',.�.a;�t; s" .;�' y" ? ?�✓•i+e' v:• X,` a: ".,e s'°'g ta' ''p;- a3:8 r ate'! .:d'.....,._......k's�`'9.r.. .:{{F"pp.'�fi.,'.h.:'.:.. e�e'45�� �. S,vx' .. pt'""r': ^rYb33':` tl'A;••,„'k��z°"xl .. 2"St s9°aYa ci=s^ {ifF :�.:r$^ :�..a: `h x`Y^Y r3,6"Y. : ••�. 3'`°:,•t.i3: " ':)` ;,�:�,sf;`.�;3, i ;�": 434 ":?.1rr<,y�,o� i .; .i''' -. ,.;� �.�,< .a ,$' {�,y,e,•.<.::" s"d15r?.>,�- ">1,3t,�w3's3, !r': e.7x.''< T...w...�Y,3_.,. ,72,:iskY.. 'p .. .MA.'a'�:.�YS - 5 F 6' 18 147 II Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP-P3000S\Synchro\AM2001 Without.sy5 i S Grady Way & Talbot Rd S 2001 Without-Project AM Peak Hour Lanes,Volumes,Timings M B El rs LI LJ LI II.; ID 0 Li LI Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations VI ++ r 1111 VI 41) vi ft r Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) I 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade(%) I 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 200 300 200 0 300 0 200 200 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed ('mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Frt Protected 0.850 0.995 0.850 0.976 0.850 0.850 FIt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow(prot) 1703 3585 1524 3438 3597 0 3574 3657 0 1752 3689 1568 Frt Perm. i 0.826 0.994 0.826 0.972 0.826 0.826 FIt Perm. I 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 1703 3585 1481 3438 3597 0 3574 3657 0 1752 3689 1524 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Volume(vph) 20 295 125 185 655 25 1310 1100 215 15 80 25 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 50 50 50 50 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Growth Factor ; 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 6% 6% 6% 5% 5% 5% 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% 3% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) 21 311 132 195 689 26 1379 1158 226 16 84 26 Lane Util. Factor' 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.03 1.05 1.05 1.03 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.00 Lane Group Flow(vph) 21 327 132 201 750 0 1420 1453 0 16 88 26 Perm or Prot? Prot Pm+Ov Prot Prot Prot Pm+Ov Phase Number 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Phase Lagging? Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Can Lead or Lag? l Maximum Split(s) 8 27 15 34 58 70 8 20 Maximum Split(%) 7% 23% 13% 28% 48% 58% 7% 17% Minimum Split(s) 8 20 8 20 8 20 8 20 Yellow Time(s) ! 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Lost Time(s) ! 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio I 0.04 0.20 0.66 0.10 0.26 0.46 0.56 0.04 0.14 0.18 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 71 717 995 344 929 1638 2042 73 523 281 V/C Ratio I 0.30 0.46 0.13 0.58 0.81 0.87 0.71 0.22 0.17 0.09 V/S Ratio Prot 0.01 0.06 0.06 0.40 0.01 0.00 V/S Ratio Perm ' 0.09 0.03 0.21 0.40 0.02 0.01 Critical LG?. Yes Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 ' 42.4 32.1 3.0 39.2 31.7 22.2 14.8 42.2 34.4 16.4 Platoon Factor 1 1.20 1.11 0.53 1.00 0.83 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.95 Incr. Delay, d2 I 0.7 0.3 0.0 1.9 3.7 3.7 0.8 0.3 0.0 0.0 Webster's St Delay 51.7 35.9 1.6 41.1 30.1 25.9 15.5 42.5 34.4 15.6 LOS 1 E D A E D D C E D C Maximum Green'(s) 4 23 11 30 54 66 4 16 Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP-P3000S\Synchro\AM2001 Without.sy5 I I i i S Grady Way & Talbot Rd S 2001 Without-Project AM Peak Hour Lanes,Volumes,Timings Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Initial (s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Recall Mode None Coord None Coord None None None None • Walk Time(s) 5 5 5 5 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11 11 11 11 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Natural Cycle: 100 Offset: 10 (8%),;Referenced to phase 2-EBT and 6-WBT, Start of Green Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 12 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.64 Intersection V/qRatio: 0.71 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 24.2 Intersection LOS: C • Splits and Phases: S Grady Way&Talbot Rd S Qe=•. `°'s' .. +jp„44m+•.e.u� ;;s}. �.^ .s `�ti€.ii�,,�•x":s:e7'. p66 `a :�>>- ,p.. 'r;� „,z:�:- .3``.°:r=:,i,`�':'r.:,,'>,,:, : iyi;gi a .�. • �.f-o-a`X',:f3:l��A-:;$s u ..,..°'; 50.4! t r,'gT>r:�' "%a>=•''��`= F1F1'S,: a�"'';. .4:•.. • ,^tdx° Vy, ;..• " Cs J . ff .y..)"�' •> "�•�; i.i fry, ,.. i.+," ,. A� x:?.i".'.�`°: �.?:".:i...e. ., � �",`F{...`Y.�w�.-.' �`�°'i'.::a�y',,N 5 6 7'11 8 Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP-P3000S\Synchro\AM2001 Without.sy5 S Grady Way & Main Av S 2001 Without-Project AM Peak Hour Lanes,Volumes,Timings • Lane Group , EBL EBT EBR •NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations V'f t� + � r Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Lengthi(ft) 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Frt Protected 0.991 0.850 0.930 0.850 Flt Protected 0.955 0.950 Satd. Flow(pros) 3299 0 0 1805 1900 1699 1553 Frt Perm. 0.991 0.850 0.930 0.850 FIt Perm. 0.955 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 3299 0 0 1805 1900 1699 1553 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Volume(vph) 300 0 20 90 725 120 555 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 50 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.90 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor ; 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles(%) 9% 9% 9% 0% 0% 4% 4% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) 326 0 22 98 788 130 603 Lane Util. Factor 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.05 Lane Group Flow(vph) 365 0 0 98 788 256 514 Perm or Prot? i Prot Prot Perm Free Phase Number 2 2 3 8 4 Phase Lagging? Lead Lag Can Lead or Lag? Maximum Split(s) 31 31 15 59 44 Maximum Split(%) 34% 34% 17% 66% 49% Minimum Split(s) 8 20 8 20 20 Yellow Time (s); 4 4 4 4 4 Lost Time(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.31 0.13 0.62 0.46 1.00 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1026 241 1182 774 1553 V/C Ratio 0.36 0.41 0.67 0.33 0.33 V/S Ratio Prot ' 0.11 0.05 V/S Ratio Perm; 0.41 0.15 0.33 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 18.2 27.1 8.3 11.9 0.0 Platoon Factor 0.59 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 , 0.1 0.6 1.0 0.1 0.0 Webster's St Delay 10.9 27.8 9.3 12.0 0.0 LOS B D B B A Maximum Green (s) 27 27 11 55 40 Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP-P3000S\Synchro\AM2001 Without.sy5 S Grady Way & Main AvS 2001 Without-Project AM Peak Hour Lanes,Volumes,Timings DEMME Lane Group EBL EBT EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Minimum Initial(s) 4 4 4 4 4 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap ( ) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce (s) • 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce(s) . 0 0 0 0 0 Recall Mode Coord Coord None None None Walk Time (s) 5 5 5 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11 11 11 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Natural Cycle: 60 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2-EBTL, Start of Green Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.53 Intersection V/C1 Ratio: 0.56 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 8.5 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: S Grady Way& Main Av S ?.+�����?''9�° •��, �,f�g.y`'. 3 : 4; . .:��=� ^'a�x�.;eba=<z.�r4.s�t"sue^ F.:`%<.*°si::Y' �:a6.:,; .��'a'a`'r''F'P.(•s, e F,'.. _ ,*"Y`aA,< t,.,.^; a�'$°r,:r•:i�z;;;';"r- .. ,y js;,:.ta �z..•; �.` '.T4r �„=§i.'5:...r,: P'� --.c��.s.-6d•;•Yoc�� s..`�`i°b, T8 Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP-P3000S\Synchro\AM2001 Without.sy5 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 .1f G WILAM.HCO Page 1 The TRANSPO Group 11730 - 118th Avenue NE Suite 600 Kirkland, WA 98034-3737 Ph: (42'5) 621-3665 Streets: (N-S) Williams Avenue (E-W) Grady Way Major Street Direction EW Length !of Time Analyzed 60 (min) Analyst KLJ Date of Analysis 10/19/99 Other Information 2001 Without-Project AM Peak Hour. Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 < 1 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 585 670 20 225 PHF . 9 . 9 . 9 . 9 Grade 0 0 0 MC' s (9,5) SU/RV' s (%) CV' s (o) PCE' s 1 .10 1 . 10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (t ) Time g (tf ) Left Turn Major Road 5 .50 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5 . 50 2 . 60 Through; Traffic Minor Road 6 . 50 3 . 30 Left Turn Minor Road 7 . 00 3 .40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1f G WIL AM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1 : RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 372 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 897 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 897 Prob. of Queue-Free State : 0 . 69 Step 4 :1 LT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 1394 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 136 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 1 . 00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 1 . 00 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 1 . 00 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 136 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 950 Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) SB L 24 136 32 .1 0 . 7 E 7 . 9 SB R 275 897 > Intersection Delay = 1. 3 sec/veh _. I i HCS : Urisignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1f G RCH AM.HCO Page 1 The TRANSPO Group 11730 4 118th Avenue NE Suite 600 Kirkland, WA 98034-3737 Ph: (425) 621-3665 i Streets : (N-S) City Hall Driveway (E-W) Grady Way Major Street Direction. . . . EW Length iof Time Analyzed. . . 60 (min) Analyst KLJ Date of Analysis 10/19/99 Other Information 2001 Without-Project AM Peak Hour. Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound H 1 L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0 2 < 0 1 2 0 0 > 0 < 0 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 440 110 100 580 20 15 PHF . 9 . 9 .9 . 9 . 9 . 9 Grade 0 0 0 MC' s (o) SU/RV' s (%) CV' s (o) PCE ' s 1 . 10 1 . 10 1 . 10 i I I Adjustment Factors I Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) 1 Left Turn Major Road 5 . 50 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5 . 50 2 . 60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6 .50 3 . 30 Left Turn Minor Road 7 . 00 3 .40 - I - i 1 HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 .1f GRCHAM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1 : RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 306 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 969 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 969 Prob. of Queue-Free State : 0 . 98 Step 2 :' LT from Major Street WB EB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 611 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 806 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 806 Prob. of Queue-Free State : 0 . 85 Step 4 : LT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 1305 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 155 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0 . 85 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0 . 85 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to. Impeding Movements 0 . 85 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 132 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95E Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) NB L 24 132 > 213 21 .2 0 . 8 D 21 .2 NB R 19 969 > WB L 122 806 5 .3 0 . 6 B 0 . 8 Intersection Delay = 1 . 0 sec/veh HCS: UnIsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1f GWEL_AM.HCO Page 1 The TRANSPO Group 11730 - 118th Avenue NE Suite 600 Kirkland, WA 98034-3737 Ph: (425) 621-3665 Streets;: (N-S) Wells Avenue (E-W) Grady Way Major Street Direction EW Length of Time Analyzed 60 (min) Analyst, KLJ Date of Analysis 10/19/99 Other Information 2001 Without-Project AM Peak Hour. Two-way! Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 < 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 110 330 645 5 PHF . 9 . 9 . 9 . 9 Grade 0 0 MC' s (9 ) SU/RV' s, (o) CV' s (%) PCE' s 1 . 10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5 . 50 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5 . 50 2 . 60 Through; Traffic Minor Road 6 . 50 3 . 30 Left Turn Minor Road 7 . 00 3 .40 -- i HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1f G WEL AM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 2 : LT from Major Street WB EB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 723 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 701 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 701 Prob. cf Queue-Free State : 0 . 81 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 950 Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) EB L 134 701 6 . 3 0 . 8 B 1 . 6 Intersection Delay = 0 . 6 sec/veh - I I— I ', i I S Grady Way;& Rainier Ave S (SR 167) 2001 Without-Project PM Peak Hour Lanes,Volumes,Timings Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations '9 ft r NI +T 1 + 1 'HT Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) ' 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade(%) 1 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 400 0 500 0 200 0 300 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Frt Protected ; 0.850 0.970 0.850 0.942 0.850 0.980 0.850 Flt Protected j 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow(prot) 1752 3689 1568 3505 3564 0 1752 5158 0 1752 5407 0 Frt Perm. 0.850 0.966 0.826 0.932 0.826 0.977 0.826 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 1752 3689 1568 3505 3564 0 1752 5158 0 1752 5407 0 Headway Factor) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ' Volume(vph) 280 770 530 825 430 105 150 615 390 235 1255 190 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 50 50 50 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles(%) 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) 298 819 564 878 457 112 160 654 415 250 1335 202 Lane Util. Facto l 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.03 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.10 1.10 Lane Group Flow(vph) 298 860 564 904 598 0 160 1176 0 250 1691 0 Perm or Prot? 1 Prot Pm+Ov Prot Prot Prot Phase Number 5 2 1 6 _ 3 8 7 4 Phase Lagging? Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag , Can Lead or Lad? Maximum Split( ) 34 33 32 31 16 32 23 39 Maximum Split(%) 28% 28% 27% 26% 13% 27% 19% 33% Minimum Split(s) 8 20 8 20 8 20 8 20 Yellow Time (s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Lost Time (s) 1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.26 0.25 0.36 0.24 0.23 0.11 0.24 0.17 0.30 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 453 922 562 847 832 190 1247 292 1622 V/C Ratio 0.66 0.93 1.00 1.07 0.72 0.84 1.24dr 0.86 1.04 V/S Ratio Prot 1 0.17 0.11 0.26 0.09 0.14 V/S Ratio Perm I 0.23 0.25 0.17 0.23 0.31 Critical LG? ' Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 30.2 33.4 27.6 34.6 32.2 39.9 33.9 36.9 31.9 Platoon Factor 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.78 1.22 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 1 2.4 11.5 30.1 44.2 2.1 18.7 10.3 14.7 28.7 Webster's St Delay 32.7 44.9 57.8 71.1 41.5 58.6 44.3 51.7 60.5 LOS 1 D E E F E E E E F Maximum Green'(s) 30 29 28 27 12 28 19 35 - Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP=P3000S\Synchro\PM2001 Without.sy5 1 S Grady Way;& Rainier Ave S (SR 167) 2001 Without-Project PM Peak Hour Lanes,Volumes,Timings OLJOEILILIELIEINWE Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Initial (s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Recall Mode None Coord None Coord None None None None Walk Time(s) 5 5 5 5 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11 11 11 11 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Natural Cycle: 150 Offset: 31 (26%), Referenced to phase 2-EBT and 6-WBT, Start of Green Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated • Lost Time: 12 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.93 Intersection V/C1Ratio: 1.03 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 53.4 Intersection LOB: E dr Defacto Right Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a right lane. Splits and Phases: S Grady Way& Rainier Ave S (SR 167) � 1 23 1114 . :z °3'""" '°�a.:,K:.;.< '^��a' s>�`�;' i�;`,�': `%::: « �a '+rc�•=-3c;;z�.Ry�e�f n^'�° ..i2f;sl ." ':t 6',�Sa, 's`r32�� �2.> 'i_ k'. :s'A"-°;° .a 3:s;yye. °•.. ;a-w.'.i°: .y,. .. ,. �hh�a?S �, —t 5 <- 6 8 7 • Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP-P3000S\Synchro\PM2001 Without.sy5 i S Grady Way & Talbot Rd S 2001 Without-Project PM Peak Hour Lanes,Volumes,Timings 1 Eil IE Li Li Li DI :11 LJ ID L: W ID Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I/ + . r +i+i 41+ till 41,) '1 ++ r Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 1 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade(%) 1 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 200 300 200 0 300 0 200 200 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Frt Protected 0.850 0.999 0.850 0.946 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow(prot 1770 3725 1583 3505 3682 0 3539 3491 0 1787 3762 1599 Frt Perm. 0.826 0.998 0.826 0.937 0.826 0.826 FIt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 1770 3725 1539 3505 3682 0 3539 3491 0 1787 3762 1554 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Volume(vph) , 70 655 610 340 580 5 340 300 170 25 680 55 Confl. Peds. (#/l)r) 50 50 50 50 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Growth Factor i, 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) 79 736 685 382 652 6 382 337 191 28 764 62 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.03 1.05 1.05 1.03 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.00 Lane Group Flow(vph) 79 773 685 393 691 0 393 555 0 28 802 62 Perm or Prot? Prot Pm+Ov Prot Prot Prot Pm+Ov Phase Number ! 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Phase Lagging?' Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Can Lead or Lag? Maximum Split(s) 15 46 19 50 23 46 9 32 Maximum Split go) 13% 38% 16% 42% 19% 38% 8% 27% Minimum Split(s) 8 20 8 20 8 20 8 20 Yellow Time(s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Lost Time (s) , 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio ! 0.10 0.36 0.53 0.13 0.39 0.17 0.36 0.05 0.24 0.34 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 177 1335 815 467 1442 590 1251 89 909 535 V/C Ratio 0.45 0.58 0.84 0.84 0.48 0.67 0.44 0.31 0.88 0.12 V/S Ratio Prot ' 0.04 0.14 0.11 0.11 0.02 0.01 V/S Ratio Perm , 0.21 0.30 0.19 0.16 0.21 0.03 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 38.6 23.7 11.8 38.6 20.8 35.6 22.3 41.8 33.3 11.5 Platoon Factor , 0.95 1.05 1.25 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.01 Incr. Delay, d2 . 1.2 0.5 5.5 9.0 0.2 2.0 0.2 0.7 7.2 0.0 Webster's St Delay 38.1 25.4 20.3 47.6 20.5 37.6 22.5 42.5 40.5 11.6 LOS D DC EC D C E E B Maximum Green (s) 11 42 15 46 19 42 5 28 Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP-P3000S\Synchro\PM2001 Without.sy5 S Grady Way & Talbot Rd S 2001 Without-Project PM Peak Hour Lanes,Volumes,Timings LJIELILJHLILILJEJLIE Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Initial (s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Recall Mode None Coord None Coord None None None None Walk Time(s) 5 5 5 5 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11 11 11 11 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Natural Cycle: 80 Offset: 58 (48%), Referenced to phase 2-EBT and 6-WBT, Start of Green Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 12 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.77 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.85 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 29.4 Intersection LOS: D Splits and Phases: S Grady Way&Talbot Rd S � 1L412 4 3 '• ,x$ z,:F: z'r• a ?',-=�"'r:3 iHr�p:' H- ':a;i ;fir` y=s i?:ir%.;"�a%•.. Asa • `'`y-. -ci'.•�:. �,`b.' ,.%, �) J,$ .shy.,.•�,,. .y ,. • .tT.�''tC• .; Jl� �,F.,a<K _'x¢�„'•.�":•. °F`'}.7' £.�. .'e?4:�'` .� ,. Z, ��'��'l!$' t� � �:.b'�e<�E"'"�'.3 .x 8. t:fi'.TL e .v r:a :R:,�,.+ 5;`W,a'Ti f".. t; $`Ld,,�..; >'y;a..ee:n S } ^t r 4`A '1��V• E'A%.- i'' :.,,,-�.. .. 2$�,.3 M:^`::.....<.,.ai"�;�i£;'�` _-,�-.;.g"',� u ..,..')k�T.�,xndjra�,I 3.i,.3. `:.P` �j,�fi `,u`.�". $.r). .'�:; J <,35ap"hq,'.s".fir..:°un Y�f .1' 5 4-- 6' 7 8 . Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP-P3000S\Synchro\PM2001 Without.sy5 S Grady Way;& Main Av S 2001 Without-Project PM Peak Hour 1 Lanes,Volumes,Timings Lane Group EBL EBT EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations rvyr 11 + Ta r Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Frt Protected . 0.976 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.960 0.950 Satd. Flow(prot) 3457 0 0 1787 1881 1863 1583 Frt Perm. I 0.976 0.850 0.850 Flt Perm. ' 0.960 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 3457 0 0 1787 1881 1863 1583 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Volume(vph) ' 670 0 125 50 260 920 730 Confl. Peds. (#/l'r) 50 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.90 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Growth Factor j 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles:(%) 3% 3% 3% 1% 1% 2% 2% Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) I 691 0 129 52 268 948 753 Lane Util. Factor 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.05 Lane Group Flow(vph) 861 0 0 52 268 995 791 Perm or Prot? Prot Prot Perm Free Phase Number I 2 2 3 8 4 Phase Lagging? Lead Lag Can Lead or Lag? Maximum Split(s) 28 28 8 62 54 Maximum Split(;%) 31% 31% 9% 69% 60% Minimum Split(s) 8 20 8 20 20 Yellow Time(s)1 4 4 4 4 4 Lost Time (s) ! 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.28 0.06 0.66 0.57 1.00 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 960 99 1233 1056 1583 V/C Ratio 0.90 0.52 0.22 0.94 0.50 V/S Ratio Prot 1 0.25 0.03 V/S Ratio Perm i 0.14 0.53 0.50 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 23.7 31.4 4.7 13.8 0.0 Platoon Factor ; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 I 7.9 3.9 0.0 11.5 0.2 Webster's St Delay 31.6 35.3 4.7 25.3 0.2 LOS D D A D A Maximum Green (s) 24 24 4 58 50 Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP-P3000S\Synchro\PM2001 Without.sy5 I I S Grady Way & Main Av S 2001 Without-Project PM Peak Hour Lanes,Volumes,Timings. w n E LJ l 9 E Lane Group EBL EBT EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Minimum Initial (s) 4 4 4 4 4 Vehicle Extensidn (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 Recall Mode Coord Coord None None None Walk Time(s) 5 5 5 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11 11 11 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 0 0 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Natural Cycle: 100 Offset: 4 (4%), Referenced to phase 2-EBTL, Start of Green Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 9 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.81 Intersection V/Ci Ratio: 0.90 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 18.8 Intersection LOS: C Splits and Phases: S Grady Way& Main Av S 412 E� 3 4, 4 �Q"„ s�e.','�-$"h?;:.341� €;;:i.' ,�¢.�,x�;� ;'�..i =-�&''hs':3�;,'w`�;°�5 �,s",i: >:;9'�r"s::'.".: :'F q;i..,;, al lns., f!r?y... `. -vEx.�5. `sf`'ts. :..: ��',� =. �'i -�, �''` say. ;:8� .:^ �t: _ ..,g.. a,:�1R." '".6'' a ui}:'. .�x:a s't3'y^' 3u.e•'>. .....-.-;s 8 I I � I Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP-P3000S\Synchro\PM2001 Without.sy5 HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1f G WIL PM.HCO Page 1 The TRANSPO Group 11730 -, 118th Avenue NE Suite 600 Kirkland, WA 98034-3737 Ph: (425) 621-3665 Streets;: (N-S) Williams Avenue (E-W) Grady Way Major Street Direction EW Length of Time Analyzed 60 (min) Analyst; KLJ Date of Analysis 10/19/99 Other Information 2001 Without-Project PM Peak Hour. Two-way! Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound j L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 < 1 Stop/Yield N N Volumes' 845 525 40 550 PHF . 9 . 9 . 9 . 9 Grade 0 0 0 MC' s (%;) SU/RV' s: (%) CV' s (%) PCE ' s 1 . 10 1 . 10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5 . 50 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5 . 50 2 . 60 Through' Traffic Minor Road 6 . 50 3 .30 Left Turn Minor Road 7 . 00 3 .40 HCS : Un'signalized Intersections Release 2 . 1f GWILPM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1 : RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 292 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 985 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 985 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0 . 32 Step 4 : LT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 1522 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 113 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 1 . 00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 1 . 00 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 1 . 00 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 113 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) SB L 48 113 . 54 . 9 2 .2 F 14 .3 SB R 672 985 > Intersection Delay = 4 .3 sec/veh • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1f G_RCH_PM.HCO Page 1 The TRANSPO Group 11730 - 118th Avenue NE Suite 600 Kirkland, WA 98034-3737 Ph: (425) 621-3665 Streets : (N-S) City Hall Driveway (E-W) Grady Way Major Street Direction EW Length of Time Analyzed 60 (min) Analyst KLJ , Date of Analysis 10/19/99 Other Information 2001 Without-Project PM Peak Hour. Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----No. Lanes 0 2 < 0 1 2 0 0 > 0 < 0 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 865 20 15 580 85 85 PHF . 9 . 9 . 9 . 9 . 9 . 9 Grade 0 0 0 MC' s (%) SU/RV' s (%) CV' s (%) PCE' s 1 . 10 1 . 10 1 . 10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5 .50 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5 . 50 2 . 60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6 . 50 3 .30 Left Turn Minor Road 7 . 00 3 .40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 .1f G RCH PM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1 : RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 492 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 780 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 780 Prob. of Queue-Free State : 0 . 87 Step 2 : LT from Major Street WB EB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 983 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 509 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 509 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0 . 96 Step 4 : LT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 1633 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 96 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0 . 96 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0 . 96 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0 . 96 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 92 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) NB L 103 92 > 165 560 .2 28 . 5 F 560 .2 NB R 103 780 > WE L 19 509 7 . 3 0 . 0 B 0 .2 Intersection Delay = 57 . 8 sec/veh i ', HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1f GWELPM.HCO Page 1 The TRANSPO Group 11730 - 118th Avenue NE Suite 600 Kirkland, WA 98034-3737 Ph: (425) 621-3665 Street : (N-S) Wells Avenue (E-W) Grady Way Major Street Direction EW Length of Time Analyzed 60 (min) Analyst KLJ Date of Analysis 10/19/99 Other Information 2001 Without-Project PM Peak Hour. Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection ' Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----No. Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 < 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 195 795 770 10 PHF . 9 . 9 . 9 . 9 I Grade 0 0 MC' s (%) SU/RV' s (%) CV' s (o) PCE' s 1 . 10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle' Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5 . 50 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5 . 50 2 . 60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6 .50 3 . 30 Left Turn Minor Road 7 . 00 3 .40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1f G WELPM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 2 : LT from Major Street WB EB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 867 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 587 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 587 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0 .59 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) EB L 239 587 10 .3 2 .3 C 2 . 0 Intersection Delay = 1 . 1 sec/veh 1 '1 S Grady Way & Rainier Ave S (SR 167) 2001 With-Project AM Peak Hour Lanes,Volume's,Timings . 5) H Li LJ LI El :211 El DI LE ID 0 Lane Group , EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 ff r vift., 1 ftt '1 'Mg, Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) i 12 12 12 , 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 400 0 500 0 200 0 300 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Frt Protected 0.850 0.978 0.850 0.941 0.850 0.967 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow(prot) 1530 3220 1369 3539 3629 0 1752 5158 0 1719 5222 0 Frt Perm. 0.850 0.974 0.826 0.932 0.826 0.962 0.826 FIt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 1530 3220 1369 3539 3629 0 1752 5158 0 1719 5222 0 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Volume(vph) 115 206 180 854 891 155 470 1025 664 100 685 190 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 50 50 50 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 18% 18% 18% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 5% 5% 5% Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) ' Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) 125 224 196 928 968 168 511 1114 722 109 745 207 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.03 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.10 1.10 Lane Group Flow(vph) 125 235 196 956 1192 0 511 2019 0 109 1048 0 ,_ Perm or Prot? ! Prot Pm+Ov Prot Prot Prot Phase Number 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Phase Lagging?1 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Can Lead or Lag? Maximum Split(s) 13 22 34 43 37 51 13 27 Maximum Split(%) 11% 18% 28% 36% 31% 43% 11% 23% Minimum Split(s) 8 20 8 20 8 20 8 20 Yellow Time(s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Lost Time(s) 1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio I 0.08 0.16 0.44 0.26 0.33 0.28 0.40 0.08 0.20 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 128 510 605 914 1210 496 2063 143 1044 V/C Ratio 0.98 0.46 0.32 1.05 0.99 1.03 1.30dr 0.76 1.00 V/S Ratio Prot 0.08 0.09 0.27 0.29 0.06 V/S Ratio Perm 0.07 0.05 0.33 0.39 0.20 Critical LG? , Yes Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d'1 41.7 34.8 15.2 33.8 30.2 32.7 27.0 40.9 36.4 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.79 1.21 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 55.2 0.5 0.1 35.6 16.9 39.2 11.3 13.8 22.2 Webster's St Delay 96.9 35.3 15.3 62.5 53.5 71.9 38.3 54.7 58.7 LOS I F D C F E F D E E ,Maximum Greenl(s) 9 18 30 39 33 47 9 23 , Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP-P3000S\Synchro\AM2001 With.sy5 S Grady Way & Rainier Ave S (SR 167) 2001 With-Project AM Peak Hour Lanes,Volumes,Timings UHILIVEILIDEIL LE Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Initial (s) 4 4 4 4 • 4 4 4 4 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Recall Mode , None Coord None Coord None None None None Walk Time (s) 5 5 5 5 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11 11 11 11 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Area Type: 1 Other Cycle Length: 120 Natural Cycle: 140 Offset: 73 (61%), Referenced to phase 2-EBT and 6-WBT, Start of Green Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 12 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.90 Intersection V/C Ratio: 1.00 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 51.4 Intersection LOS: E dr Defacto Right Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a right lane. Splits and Phases: S Grady Way& Rainier Ave S(SR 167) c1 2 E1 3 4 -'�<°'fi.` ;.a:r;?•d. '0f" `ka'1` a ` :�i" •i.aJi.:' '4y• ., t• '..;�`'r'".i`";taa't .. r`:zi'r iii* io �'s%A�' !.t?iL�."�. ,p?.: . . .. .<3�s.iit:t:, ,. . 2- • • Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP-P3000S1'Synchro\AM2001 With.sy5 1 S Grady Way & Talbot Rd S 2001 With-Project AM Peak Hour Lanes,Volumes,Timings Lane Group 1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations " ++ r Vivi +T. vi +I 1 +t F Ideal Flow(vphp1) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 .12 12 12 12 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 200 300 200 0 300 0 200 200 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Frt Protected ; 0.850 0.993 0.850 0.976 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow(prot) 1703 3585 1524 3438 3590 0 3574 3657 0 1752 3689 1568 Fit Perm. 0.826 0.992 0.826 0.972 0.826 0.826 1 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 1703 3585 1481 3438 3590 0 3574 3657 0 1752 3689 1524 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Volume(vph) 1 20 330 125 200 677 31 1318 1102 214 25 80 25 Confl. Peds. (#/Fir) 50 50 50 50 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 6% 6% 6% 5% 5% 5% 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% 3% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) 21 347 132 211 713 33 1387 1160 225 26 84 26 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.03 1.05 1.05 1.03 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.00 Lane Group Flow(vph) 21 364 132 217 784 0 1429 1454 0 26 88 26 Perm or Prot? 1 Prot Pm+Ov Prot Prot Prot Pm+Ov Phase Number 1 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Phase Lagging?. Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Can Lead or Lag? Maximum Split(s) 8 27 16 35 57 68 9 20 Maximum Split(%) 7% 23% 13% 29% 48% 57% 8% 17% Minimum Split(s) 8 20 8 20 8 20 8 20 Yellow Time(s) ' 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Lost Time(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 1 0.04 0.20 0.65 0.11 0.27 0.45 0.54 0.05 0.14 0.18 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 71 717 982 372 957 1608 1981 88 523 281 V/C Ratio 0.30 0.51 0.13 0.58 0.82 0.89 0.73 0.30 0.17 0.09 V/S Ratio Prot 0.01 0.06 0.06 0.40 0.01 0.00 V/S Ratio Perm 1 0.10 0.03 0.22 0.40 0.02 0.01 Critical LG? 1 Yes Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 42.4 32.5 3.1 38.7 31.4 23.0 15.9 41.8 34.4 16.2 Platoon Factor 1.19 1.08 0.50 0.99 0.61 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Incr. Delay, d2 . 0.7 0.5 0.0 1.7 4.0 4.7 1.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 Webster's St Delay 51.0 35.7 1.5 40.0 23.2 27.7 16.9 42.3 34.4 15.5 LOS 1 E D A E C D C E D C Maximum Green I(s) 4 23 12 31 53 64 5 16 1 Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP=P3000S\Synchro\AM2001 With.sy5 S Grady Way & Talbot Rd S 2001 With-Project AM Peak Hour Lanes,Volumes,Timings El Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Initial (s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Recall Mode None Coord None Coord None None None None Walk Time(s) 5 5 5 5 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11 11 11 11 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Natural Cycle: 100 Offset: 10 (8%), Referenced to phase 2-EBT and 6-WBT, Start of Green Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 12 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.65 Intersection V/C;Ratio: 0.73 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 24.2 Intersection LOS: C Splits and Phases: S Grady Way&Talbot Rd S c j 1 T 2 J, 4 (1 13 }}��,' ^�c�..!`.as: �.��?�v 'k 'ins �FS;��a'. "fd.�'�. .. ''- .. ;may "^`�.' t'k;'., �����• � 1n•�',".`,'r;.��,a y$mF .;*sti•;. fir:.a'...�..i: � .. ".'.fls,'^. 1 P �' 'vS".�x�,'.,.tom: . fig.: � $�g- '...'- ...-, ? ... x.... w-: J. 54- 6 '.7 8 Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP-P3000S\Synchro\AM2001 With.sy5 1 S Grady Way &Williams Av S 2001 With-Project AM Peak Hour Lanes,Volumes,Timings M IE El ID R.i El El EJ LI IE El E Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow(vphpi) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 �1900 1900 �1900 1900 1900 �1900 Lane Width (ft) , 11 11 12 12 11 11 12 12 12 16 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 1 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 _ Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes r Frt Protected 0.997 0.850 0.85,0 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected ' 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.968 Satd. Flow(prot) 0 3591 0 1752 3566 0 1770 0 1583 0 1821 1599 Frt Perm. I 0.997 0.826 0.826 0.826 0.826 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.877 0.950 0.980 Satd. Flow(perm) 0 3591 0 1752 3566 0 1634 0 1539 0 1844 1554 Headway Factor 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Volume(vph) 0 598 11 26 648 0 65 0 15 20 10 225 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%)I 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) 1 Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) I 0 664 12 29 720 0 72 0 17 22 11 250 Lane Util. Factor 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 710 0 29 756 0 72 0 17 0 33 250 Perm or Prot? ! Perm Prot Perm Pm+Ov Perm Perm Phase Number 2 1 6 8 8 Phase Lagging? Lag Lead Can Lead or Lag? Maximum Split(s) 73 11 84 36 36 Maximum Split(%) 61% 9% 70% 30% 30% Minimum Split(s) 20 8 20 20 20 Yellow Time(s) 4 4 4 4 4 Lost Time(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.58 0.07 0.68 0.28 0.34 0.28 0.28 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 2095 117 2407 449 529 507 427 V/C Ratio 0.34 0.25 0.31 0.16 0.03 0.07 0.59 V/S Ratio Prot 0.02 0.00 1 ' V/S Ratio Perm 0.20 0.21 0.04 0.01 0.02 0.16 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 9.9 40.4 6.1 25.1 18.5 24.4 28.5 Platoon Factor 0.38 1.00 0.63 1.00 1.22 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 I 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 Webster's St Delay 3.8 40.6 3.9 25.1 22.6 24.4 30.1 LOS A E A D C C D Maximum Green:(s) 69 7 80 32 • 32 Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP-P3000S\Synchro\AM2001 With.sy5 i I , E S Grady Way &Williams Av S 2001 With-Project AM Peak Hour I—, Lanes,Volumes,Timings Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Initial (s) 4 4 4 4 4 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 Recall Mode Coord None Coord None None Walk Time (s) 5 5 5 5 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11 11 11 11 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Natural Cycle: 50 Offset: 18 (15%), Referenced to phase 2-EBT and 6-WBT, Start of Green Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 9 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.38 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.41 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 9.3 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: S Grady Way&Williams Av S 4-11 -2 . �,3'i`^ez?�_$�§°'.:ai;� ;. .k..;;,"t., -�:�`v-ae.:�i.-• ��•2x.�p: +x'es"" ,,�'t';.., 84:- .ua :i::-;s. `"'- ,.::e r .y:4 k y `'• .i :..Y2",� •'';i:.`z ` .�� f::..:;:-..7h Pw`i p.,g..d #° ^: '�' _ e-�M :e�3." -c:,:=� 's:l�,.��.a° r `•-.M°"'.°:�. "pp.,5.,w.,.b�,_ "'"'a:sz;.. �,- z�.,'F B� ;.'?k+ ;.�;, .. ..,.w;.�:."=`:.e;". .. ...,....` z'..:fei<.x:�£:c,`::x}.::"1":..�... .i3�°:.�i•..`,:'tt;3�4"!-.,:`r„'�-'.`°.< ..',f,:� .. -' 3 %.. „�''`.tu��;'�'`.. F 6 III 8 j Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP-P3000S\Synchro\AM2001 With.sy5 • S Grady Way & Main Av S 2001 With-Project AM Peak Hour Lanes,Volumes,Timings LIBLIEIDLJO Lane Group EBL EBT EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations 'p'f ' t r Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Frt Protected 0.989 0.850 0.931 0.850 Flt Protected 0.956 0.950 Satd. Flow(prot) 3296 0 0 1805 1900 1701 1553 Frt Perm. 0.989 0.850 0.931 0.850 Flt Perm. 0.956 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 3296 0 0 1805 1900 1701 1553 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Volume (vph) 316 0 24 95 725 120 574 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 50 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.90 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 9% 9% 9% 0% 0% 4% 4% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) 343 0 26 103 788 130 624 Lane Util. Factor 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.05 Lane Group Flow(vph) 387 0 0 103 788 255 537 Perm or Prot? Prot Prot Perm Free Phase Number 2 2 3 8 4 Phase Lagging? Lead Lag Can Lead or Lag? Maximum Split(s) 31 31 17 59 42 Maximum Split(%) 34% 34% 19% 66% 47% Minimum Split(s) 8 20 8 20 20 Yellow Time (s) 4 4 4 4 4 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.31 0.16 0.62 0.43 1.00 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1025 281 1182 737 1553 V/C Ratio 0.38 0.37 0.67 0.35 0.35 V/S Ratio Prot 0.12 0.06 V/S Ratio Perm 0.41 0.15 0.35 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 18.4 25.8 8.3 12.9 0.0 Platoon Factor 0.59 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 0.1 0.4 1.0 0.1 0.1 Webster's St Delay 11.0 26.2 9.3 13.0 0.1 LOS B D B B A Maximum Green (s) 27 27 13 55 38 Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP-P3000S\Synchro1AM2001 With.sy5 1_ S Grady Way'& Main Av S 2001 With-Project AM Peak Hour Lanes,Volumes,Timings lEIDEIDEILI Lane Group EBL EBT EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Minimum Initial (s) 4 4 4 4 4 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 Recall Mode Coord Coord None None None Walk Time(s) 5 5 5 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11 11 11 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Natural Cycle: 60 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2-EBTL, Start of Green Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.53 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.57 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 8.5 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: S Grady Way& Main Av S 3 y 4 :- '�&:ss�zz;M4'-�#f::,�i=• ;:r'�'s":�-:`>i�::% � { ;��. at�vK=% RSi ;��r it,,�.;-��:..i;. "a'- "^�'�,:.�,���r•::r' ,� :., � N w"A _: ;^d:C,� .$M?[: zL .3a S, h>'J.f'4° ,: maF � '+tea•; r l7 ;'� x��:a 0-"'s04 "``��•F;� :11:Wgr WI 8 Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP=P3000S\Synchro\AM2001 With.sy5 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1f G WIL_AM.HCO Page 1 The TRANSPO Group 11730 - 118th Avenue NE Suite 600 Kirkland, WA 98034-3737 Ph: (425) 621-3665 Streets: (N-S) Williams Avenue (E-W) Grady Way Major Street Direction EW Length of Time Analyzed 60 (min) Analyst KLJ Date of Analysis 10/19/99 Other Information 2001 With-Project AM Peak Hour. Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----No. Lanes 0 2 < 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 > 1 1 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 598 11 26 648 65 15 20 10 225 PHF . 9 . 9 . 9 . 9 . 9 . 9 . 9 . 9 . 9 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC' s (o) SU/RV' s (o) CV' s (%) PCE' s 1 . 10 1 . 10 1 . 10 1 . 10 1 . 10 1 : 10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5 . 50 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5 . 50 2 . 60 Through' Traffic Minor Road 6 . 50 3 .30 Left Turn Minor Road 7 . 00 3 .40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1f G WIL AM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1 : RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 338 360 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 933 910 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 933 910 Prob. of Queue-Free State : 0 . 98 0 . 70 Step 2 : LT from Major Street WB EB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 676 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 743 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 743 Prob. df Queue-Free State : 0 . 96 Step 3 : TH from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 1425 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 160 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0 . 96 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 153 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0 . 92 Step 4 : LT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 1425 1414 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 130 132 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0 . 88 0 . 96 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0 . 91 0 . 96 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0 . 63 0 . 94 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 83 124 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) NB L 79 83 276 . 0 8 . 9 F 225 . 0 NB R 19 933 3 . 9 0 . 0 A SB L 24 124 > 132 37 .4 1 . 2 E SB T 12 153 > 9 .4 SB R 275 910 5 . 7 1 . 5 B WB L 32 743 5 . 1 0 . 0 B 0 . 2 Intersection Delay = 12 . 7 sec/veh HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1f G_RCH AM.HCO Page 1 The TRANSPO Group 11730 118th Avenue NE Suite 600 Kirkland, WA 98034-3737 Ph: (425) 621-3665 Streets : (N-S) City Hall Driveway (E-W) Grady Way Major Street Direction EW Length of Time Analyzed 60 (min) Analyst KLJ Date of Analysis 10/19/99 Other Information 2001 With-Project AM Peak Hour. Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0 2 < 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 468 110 100 604 15 PHF . 9 . 9 . 9 . 9 . 9 Grade 0 0 0 MC' s (%) SU/RV' s (%) CV' s (%) PCE' s 1 . 10 1 . 10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (t f) Left Turn Major Road 5 . 50 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5 . 50 2 . 60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6 . 50 3 . 30 Left Turn Minor Road 7. 00 3 .40 HCS: Unsignalized g d Intersections Release 2 . 1f G RCH AM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1 : RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 321 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 952 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 952 Prob. of Queue-Free State : 0 . 98 Step 2 : LT from Major Street WB EB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 642 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 775 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 775 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0 . 84 Intersection Performance Summary 1 ' Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach , Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay I j Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) 3 . 9 NB R 19 952 3 . 9 0 . 0 A WB L 122 775 5 . 5 0 . 6 B 0 . 8 Intersection Delay = 0 . 5 sec/veh HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1f G WEL AM.HCO Page 1 The TRANSPO Group 11730 L 118th Avenue NE Suite 600 Kirkland, WA 98034-3737 Ph: (425) 621-3665 Street : (N-S) Wells Avenue (E-W) Grady Way Major Street Direction EW Length of Time Analyzed 60 (min) Analyst KLJ Date of Analysis 10/19/99 Other Information 2001 With-Project AM Peak Hour. Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 < 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 118 35.0 669 5 PHF . 9 . 9 . 9 . 9 Grade 0 0 MC' s (%) SU/RV' s (.) CV' s (%) PCE' s 1 . 10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5 .50 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5 . 50 2 . 60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6 .50 3 .30 Left Turn Minor Road 7. 00 3 .40 --I HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1f G WEL AM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 2 : LT from Major Street WB EB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 749 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 679 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 679 Prob. of Queue-Free State : 0 . 79 _ Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95: Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) EB L 144 679 6 . 7 0 . 9 B 1. 7 Intersection Delay = 0 . 7 sec/veh HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1f G HDD AM.HCO Page 1 The TRANSPO Group 11730 - 118th Avenue NE Suite 600 Kirkland, WA 98034-3737 Ph: (425) 621-3665 Streets : (N-S) Home Depot Driveway (E-W) Grady Way Major Street Direction EW Length of Time Analyzed 60 (min) Analyst KLJ Date of Analysis 10/19/99 Other Information 2001 With-Project AM Peak Hour. Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0 2 < 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 309 35 903 15 PHF . 9 . 9 . 9 . 9 Grade 0 0 0 MC' s (%) SU/RV' s (%) CV' s (%) PCE' s 1. 10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5 .50 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5 . 50 2 . 60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6 . 50 3 . 30 Left Turn Minor Road 7 . 00 3 .40 I HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1f GHDD_AM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1 : RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 191 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1108 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1108 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0 . 98 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 950 Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) 3 .3 NB R 19 1108 3 .3 0 . 0 A Intersection Delay = 0 . 0 sec/veh HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1f T HDDAM.HCO Page 1 The TRANSPO Group 11730 118th Avenue NE Suite 600 Kirkland, WA 98034-3737 Ph: (425) 621-3665 Streets : (N-S) Talbot Road (E-W) Home Depot Drivew ay Major Street Direction NS Length ,of Time Analyzed 60 (min) Analyst KLJ Date of Analysis 10/19/99 Other Information 2001 With-Project AM Peak Hour. Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Laries 0 2 < 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 2618 24 410 16 PHF . 9 . 9 . 9 . 9 Grade 0 0 0 MC' s (o) SU/RV' s (o) CV' s (o) PCE ' s 1 . 10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle; Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5 .50 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5 . 50 2 . 60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6 .50 3 .30 Left Turn Minor Road 7 . 00 3 .40 HCS: Urisignalized Intersections • Release 2 . 1f THDD AM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1 : RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 1468 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 250 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 250 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0 . 92 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) 15 . 7 WB R 20 250 15 . 7 0 .2 C Intersection Delay = 0 . 1 sec/veh S Grady Way & Rainier Ave S (SR 167) 2001 With-Project PM Peak Hour Lanes,Volumes,Timings LJEILIOHMEDLIONLJE Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 44 rr vi) 4i, ' 141 11 141 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 400 0 500 0 200 0 300. 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Frt Protected 0.850 0.971 0.850 0.939 0.850 0.980 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow(prot) 1752 3689 1568 3505 3564 0 1752 5141 0 1752 5407 0 Frt Perm. 0.850 0.966 0.826 0.929 0.826 0.977 0.826 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 1752 3689 1568 3505 3564 0 1752 5141 0 1752 5407 0 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Volume(vph) 280 778 530 865 439 105 150 615 422 235 1255 190 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 50 50 50 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles(%) 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) 298 828 564 920 467 112 160 654 449 250 1335 202 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.03 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.10 1.10 Lane Group Flow(vph) 298 869 564 948 608 0 160 1213 0 250 1691 0 Perm or Prot? Prot Pm+Ov Prot Prot Prot Phase Number 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Phase Lagging? Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Can Lead or Lag? Maximum Split(s) 33 33 33 33 16 32 22 38 Maximum Split(%) 28% 28% 28% 28% 13% 27% 18% 32% Minimum Split(s) 8 20 8 20 8 20 8 20 Yellow Time(s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.25 0.25 0.36 0.25 0.25 0.11 0.24 0.16 0.29 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 438 922 562 876 891 190 1242 277 1577 V/C Ratio 0.68 0.94 1.00 1.08 0.68 0.84 1.34dr 0.90 1.07 V/S Ratio Prot 0.17 0.11 0.27 0.09 0.14 V/S Ratio Perm 0.24 0.25 0.17 0.24 0.31 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 30.9 33.5 27.6 34.2 30.9 39.9 34.3 37.7 32.3 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.80 1.36 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 2.9 12.7 30.1 49.5 1.5 18.7 15.0 21.0 39.6 Webster's St Delay 33.8 46.2 57.8 76.7 43.5 58.6 49.3 58.7 71.9 LOS D E E F E E E E F Maximum Green;(s) 29 29 29 29 12 28 18 34 Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP=P3000S\Synchro\PM2001 With.sy5 S Grady Way & Rainier Ave S (SR 167) 2001 With-Project PM Peak Hour 1 Lanes,Volumes,Timings Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Initial (s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Recall Mode None Coord None Coord None None None None Walk Time (s) 5 5 5 5 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11 11 11 11 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 , Natural Cycle: 140 Offset: 31 (26%), Referenced to phase 2-EBT and 6-WBT, Start of Green Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 12 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.94 1 Intersection V/C Ratio: 1.05 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 58.7 Intersection LOS: E dr Defacto Right Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a right lane. Splits and Phases: S Grady Way &Rainier Ave S (SR 167) cut -0 2 E1 3 J, `4 3«�3 r„;aks: i.:'.s,: :.2' �ry .` a:i;-110%�?,:sf: ::'r,V.a�,i` y},.:+4'�?n -a::.: w 'y,' •.��;-; .::•:=•v'w>`aa,:wb,-c;:.e'` >, .'J.7' '.4��V.31•�•f x-a=;-_ ':i., v?w7:� �:3-`}'..t%.b:1Xk:7, ',F�:;'.'yt>d�; ;�1�,',a,y. �•. ' .�.£:. ,�tg1T�i„r Etr.y 3tKil am tfthM ' rA: n mo . :AF* P: : A < . zz te�: , -.i' -5 F16 1 18 7 Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP-P3000S\Synchro\PM2001 With.sy5 S Grady Way & Talbot Rd S 2001 With-Project PM Peak Hour Lanes,Volumes,Timings Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations vi ft r vivi +T VI +1 1 ft r Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (MI 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) ! 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length'(ft) 200 300 200 0 300 0 200 200 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Frt Protected 0.850 0.996 0.850 0.947 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow(prot) 1770 3725 1583 3505 3675 0 3539 3495 0 1787 3762 1599 Frt Perm. 0.826 0.996 0.826 0.938 0.826 0.826 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 1770 3725 1539 3505 3675 0 3539 3495 0 1787 3762 1554 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Volume (vph) 70 705 600 383 616 15 353 303 167 45 671 55 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 50 50 50 50 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Growth Factor i 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) j 79 792 674 430 692 17 397 340 188 51 754 62 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.03 1.05 1.05 1.03 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.00 Lane Group Flow(vph) 79 832 . 674 443 745 0 409 554 0 51 792 62 Perm or Prot? 1 Prot Pm+Ov Prot Prot Prot Pm+Ov Phase Number 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Phase Lagging? Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Can Lead or Lag? Maximum Split(s) 15 45 21 51 23 42 12 31 Maximum Split(%) 13% 38% 18% 43% 19% 35% 10% 26% Minimum Split(s) 8 20 8 20 8 20 8 20 Yellow Time(s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Lost Time(s) I 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio I 0.10 0.35 0.52 0.15 0.40 0.17 0.33 0.08 0.23 0.33 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 177 1304 802 526 1470 590 1136 134 878 522 V/C Ratio ! 0.45 0.64 0.84 0.84 0.51 0.69 0.49 0.38 0.90 0.12 V/S Ratio Prot 0.04 0.14 0.13 0.12 0.03 0.01 V/S Ratio Perm I 0.22 0.29 0.20 0.16 0.21 0.03 Critical LG? I Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 38.6 24.8 11.5 37.7 20.6 35.8 24.7 40.1 33.9 11.8 Platoon Factor 0.87 1.17 1.40 0.87 0.82 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 [ 1.2 0.8 5.6 8.2 0.2 2.4 0.3 0.9 8.9 0.0 Webster's St Delay 34.7 29.9 21.7 41.1 17.1 38.2 25.0 41.0 42.9 11.9 1 LOS 1 D D C E C D C E E B Maximum Green'(s) 11 41 17 47 19 38 8 27 Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP P3000S\Synchro\PM2001 With.sy5 1 ' 1 I S Grady Way & Talbot Rd S 2001 With-Project PM Peak Hour Lanes,Volumes,Timings LA El LIHEIECIONEILJ Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Initial (s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Recall Mode None Coord None Coord None None None None Walk Time (s) 5 5 5 5 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11 11 11 11 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 • Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Natural Cycle: 80 Offset: 58 (48%), Referenced to phase 2-EBT and 6-WBT, Start of Green Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 12 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.77 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.86 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 30.0 Intersection LOS: D Splits and Phases: S Grady Way &Talbot Rd S , i— 1 2 j, 4 !LI3 �1: �:�".qC} '. E '.�• :%£ �.n., ::2s,. �F . •'T, `T.�.- 'lam=' kC.•;' ....:,1;"•..�,.a�¢;�:�+„�,i�` ,�>i��<=,rs"�t�i�s'�'': yP,a fi'�r.���R�'.x•°':'`;�":'�9`�' _ �I '��.. _:.�:. �a�.�.�s�;c� � , fi y.z„ :.5.<m.; .}�r¢,t 's.pS,=•'?.;'•?(xrtt.;.,�,r4"<.;:,€i. .r�,., aY ?'.:'..m:<,c: : '... . .;�:, ;`r>�._,�„r,',..,:.�"+��: '.^�F��'..��m<:��»-`���eu'�.�. �S : �` =� �ir�'• �'??' �a'• ^�. •�° + rf ,st`i ,#�•"., w 'exz�;.,. .,?,'�' i R <.y V..v, .3ir s; :prAgOt .r .a §- 1704-4sapx• .�: 115` 4_ 6 417 TJ8 • Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP-P3000S\Synchro\PM2001 With.sy5 S Grady Way &Williams Av S 2001 With-Project PM Peak Hour Lanes,Volumes,Timings M EJ Li L i El El El Li �.,9" N ICJ E Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ft 'I +1 rt 4 r Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (MI 11 11 12 12 11 11 12 12 12 16 12 12 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length;(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 1 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Frt Protected 0.997 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.962 Satd. Flow(prot) 0 3552 0 1736 3532 0 1770 0 1583 0 1792 1583 Frt Perm. 0.996 0.826 0.826 0.826 0.826 FIt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.808 0.950 0.973 Satd. Flow(perm) 0 3552 0 1736 3532 0 1505 0 1539 0 1812 1539 Headway Factor 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Volume (vph) 1 , 0 862 20 50 417 0 197 0 29 40 11 550 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.90 0.92 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehiclesl(%) 3% 3% 3% 4% 4% 4% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) 0 937 22 56 453 0 219 0 32 43 12 598 Lane Util. Factor 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 1007 0 56 476 0 219 0 32 0 55 598 Perm or Prot? I Perm Prot Perm Pm+Ov Perm Perm Phase Number : 2 1 6 8 4 Phase Lagging? Lag Lead Can Lead or Lag? Maximum Split(s) 46 11 57 63 63 Maximum Split(%) 38% 9% 48% 53% 53% Minimum Split(s) 20 8 20 20 20 Yellow Time (s), 4 4 4 4 4 • Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.36 0.07 0.45 0.50 0.57 0.50 0.50 I ' Lane Grp Cap(vph) 1273 116 1589 752 875 906 770 V/C Ratio 0.79 0.48 0.30 0.29 0.04 0.06 0.78 V/S Ratio Prot 0.03 0.00 V/S Ratio Perm 0.28 0.13 0.15 0.02 0.03 0.39 Critical LG? II Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 26.2 41.0 15.9 13.3 7.8 11.7 18.6 Platoon Factor 0.34 1.00 0.76 1.00 1.37 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 ; 2.4 2.5 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 3.5 Webster's St Delay 11.3 43.5 12.2 13.4 10.6 11.7 22.2 LOS B E B B B B C Maximum Greeri(s) 42 7 53 59 59 Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP=P3000S\Synchro\PM2001 With.sy5 S Grady Way &Williams Av S 2001 With-Project PM Peak Hour Lanes,Volumes,Timings Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Initial (s) 4 4 4 4 4 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 Recall Mode Coord None Coord None None Walk Time(s) 5 5 5 5 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11 11 11 11 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Natural Cycle: 75 Offset: 76 (63%), Referenced to phase 2-EBT and 6-WBT, Start of Green Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 9 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.70 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.76 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 15.0 Intersection LOS: C Splits and Phases: S Grady Way&Williams Av S 4, 4 , i,a^ k�^.afi� z :•: :. . 'd.. ir].=.::t;;-� -;r+`p; -s,;:: '_.r:'�...:.4F:k'v r,'a D'g::.�.,.r;.,,c,.�e<�: •#`:. '.tP '; w��� �::,� :P'`-:? <q,' � '. �g.'+.��f% ,�:t£'y: ?�+3�-.ga',:� m`.a -.:!'F' d >$ �lk�td"'p. `,�-: S!a _. �p;"., � � ��'7'"?3'�1= < <<i.&;•eF�; < .,,.;`�i°�_`;s�.r ���tt;��;._. s,.rees4.s�«:m�>'»��"n' ., �.',, <;a..�.a.� . =,�s� ;�r�'4� f�s:�.. ,„ �a•r: z . ` y i.�;F♦r,;;;A '•i:F, UNf V C ` '..:` �f : . F 6 .':v•,�!$<�'^a�:r:&r.":,:,'.s:�'u 5=-.=.r4�.am'k'i`'�d:�-="-�s,`�"F;3_^;.`...,;,...a`r?:r'5tPi4'' =,<•I8 • it Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP-P3000S\Synchro\PM2001 With.sy5 1 1 S Grady Way & Main Av S 2001 With-Project PM Peak Hour Lanes,Volumes,Timings ID B Li 21 El Li E 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ing 1 + 1 r Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Frt Protected , 0.976 0.850 0.850 FIt Protected 0.960 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3457 0 0 1787 1881 1863 1583 Frt Perm. 0.976 0.850 0.850 Flt Perm. 0.960 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 3457 0 0 1787 1881 1863 1583 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Volume(vph) ! 696 0 132 55 260 920 752 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 50 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.90 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles;(%) 3% 3% 3% 1% 1% 2% 2% Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) 718 0 136 57 268 948 775 Lane Util. Factor 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.05 Lane Group Flow(vph) 897 0 0 57 268 995 814 Perm or Prot? ! Prot Prot Perm Free Phase Number 2 2 3 8 4 Phase Lagging? Lead Lag Can Lead or Lag? Maximum Split(s) 28 28 8 62 54 Maximum Split(1/o) 31% 31% 9% 69% 60% Minimum Split(s) 8 20 8 20 20 Yellow Time (s) 4 4 4 4 4 Lost Time(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.28 0.06 0.66 0.57 1.00 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 960 • 99 1233 1056 1583 V/C Ratio . 0.93 0.57 0.22 0.94 0.51 V/S Ratio Prot 0.26 0.03 V/S Ratio Perm 0.14 0.53 0.51 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 24.1 31.5 4.7 13.8 0.0 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 11.4 5.6 0.0 11.5 0.2 Webster's St Delay 35.4 37.1 4.7 25.3 0.2 LOS 1 D D A D A Maximum Greene(s) 24 24 4 58 50 - Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP-P3000S\Synchro\PM2001 With.sy5 S Grady Way & Main Av S 2001 With-Project PM Peak Hour Lanes,Volumes,Timings Lane Group EBL EBT EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Minimum Initial (s) 4 4 4 4 4 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 Recall Mode Coord Coord None None None Walk Time (s) 5 5 5 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11 11 11 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 0 0 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Natural Cycle: 100 Offset: 4 (4%), Referenced to phase 2-EBTL, Start of Green Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 9 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.83 Intersection V/C'Ratio: 0.92 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 20.0 Intersection LOS: C Splits and Phases: S Grady Way&Main Av S c �.�-�.`: st;,r"�"', k' '"':$£,- :s;. a";��k: c,r,�.xs .,,�,,., � s•. "�.'gi;z;« «�, fr�� �;r�s;�rb. �� j,P'-` `�.,:K ;• . .�e.: .. � ..-i'.F. 5.�.4�«:� ':` �>. >'S... �. �¢;n :'dW,"„''n9:;�,iPi .�. ca,�'.:=%£>'.'Y iezrw � �:.....,...,..-.�e'k:':.•:. ... -'v^ ._ Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP=P3000S\Synchro\PM2001 With.sy5 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 .1f G WILPM.HCO Page 1 The TRANSPO Group 11730 - 118th Avenue NE Suite 600 Kirkland, WA 98034-3737 Ph: (425) 621-3665 Streets : (N-S) Williams Avenue (E-W) Grady Way Major Street Direction EW Length of Time Analyzed 60 (min) Analyst KLJ Date of Analysis 10/19/99 Other Information 2001 With-Project PM Peak Hour. Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0 2 < 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 > 1 1 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 862 20 50 417 197 29 40 11 550 PHF . 9 . 9 . 9 . 9 . 9 . 9 . 9 . 9 . 9 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC' s (%) SU/RV' s (%) CV' s (%) PCE' s 1 . 10 1 . 10 1 . 10 1 . 10 1 .10 1 . 10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5 .50 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5 .50 2 . 60 Through' Traffic Minor Road 6 . 50 3 . 30 Left Turn Minor Road 7 . 00 3 .40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1f G WIL PM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1 : RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 490 232 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 782 1056 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 782 1056 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0 . 96 0 .36 Step 2 : LT from Major Street WB EB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 980 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 510 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 510 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0 . 88 Step 3 :' TH from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 1499 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 145 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0 . 88 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 127 Prob. of Queue-Free State : 0 . 90 Step 4 : LT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 1494 1477 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 117 120 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0 . 79 0 . 88 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0 . 84 0 . 88 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0 .30 0 . 84 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 36 101 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) NB L , 241 36 * 103 . 0 F * NB R 35 782 4 . 8 0 . 0 A SB L 48 101 > 106 77 . 5 3 .5 F ; ' SB T 13 127 > 15 . 1 SB R 672 1056 9 .3 5 .4 B WB L 62 510 8 . 0 0 .4 B 0 . 9 Intersection Delay = 952 . 0 sec/veh HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1f G RCH_PM.HCO Page 1 I - The TRANSPO Group 11730 - 118th Avenue NE Suite 600 Kirkland, WA 98034-3737 Ph: (425) 621-3665 Streets : (N-S) City Hall Driveway (E-W) Grady Way Major Street Direction EW Length ,of Time Analyzed 60 (min) Analyst KLJ Date of Analysis 10/19/99 Other Information 2001 With-Project PM Peak Hour. Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection 1 ' Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -- No. Lanes 0 2 < 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 911 20 15 607 85 PHF . 9 . 9 . 9 . 9 . 9 Grade 0 0 0 i MC' s (%) SU/RV' s (o) CV' s (%) PCE' s 1 . 10 1 . 10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5 . 50 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5 . 50 2 . 60 Through' Traffic Minor Road 6 . 50 3 .30 Left Turn Minor Road 7. 00 3 .40 ; I I HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1f GRCHPM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1 : RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 517 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 757 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 757 Prob. of Queue-Free State : 0 . 86 Step 2 : LT from Major Street WB EB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 1034 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 478 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 478 Prob. of Queue-Free State : 0 . 96 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 950 Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) 5 . 5 NB R 103 757 5 .5 0 . 5 B WB L 19 478 7 . 8 0 . 0 B 0 . 2 Intersection Delay = 0 .4 sec/veh it 1 HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1f G WELPM.HCO Page 1 The TRANSPO Group 11730 - 118th Avenue NE Suite 600 Kirkland, WA 98034-3737 Ph: (425) 621-3665 Streets : (N-S) Wells Avenue (E-W) Grady Way Major Street Direction EW Length of Time Analyzed 60 (min) Analyst KLJ Date of Analysis 10/19/99 Other Information 2001 With-Project PM Peak Hour. Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R • L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----No. Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 < 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 208 828 797 10 PHF . 9 . 9 . 9 . 9 Grade 0 0 MC' s (%) SU/RV' s (6) CV' s (%) PCE' s 1 . 10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap g(t ) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5 .50 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5 . 50 2 . 60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6 . 50 3 .30 Left Turn Minor Road 7 . 00 3 .40 HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1f GWELPM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 2 : LT from Major Street WB EB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 897 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 566 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 566 Prob. of Queue-Free State : 0 . 55 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 950 Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) EB L 254 566 11 . 5 2 . 6 C 2 .3 Intersection Delay = 1 . 3 sec/veh HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1f GHDDPM.HCO Page 1 The TRANSPO Group 11730 - 118th Avenue NE Suite 600 Kirkland, WA 98034-3737 Ph: (425) 621-3665 Street : (N-S) Home Depot Driveway (E-W) Grady Way Major Street Direction EW Length of Time Analyzed 60 (min) Analyst KLJ Date of Analysis 10/19/99 Other Information 2001 With-Project PM Peak Hour. Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound 1 Westbound Northbound Southbound ,L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----No. Lanes 0 2 < 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 867 60 1014 30 PHF . 9 . 9 . 9 . 9 Grade 0 0 0 MC' s (o) SU/RV' s (%) CV' s (o) PCE' s 1 . 10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5 . 50 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5 . 50 2 . 60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6 . 50 3 .30 Left Turn Minor Road 7 . 00 3 .40 HCS: Unsi nalized Intersections g e Release 2 . 1f GHDDPM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1 : RT from Minor Street NB' SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 515 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 759 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 759 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0 . 95 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) 5 . 0 NB R 36 759 5 . 0 0 . 0 A Intersection Delay = 0 . 1 sec/veh -I - HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1f T HDDPM.HCO Page 1 The TRANSPO Group 11730 - 118th Avenue NE Suite 600 Kirkland, WA 98034-3737 Ph: (425) 621-3665 Streets : (N-S) Talbot Road - (E-W) Home Depot Drivew ay Major Street Direction NS Length of Time Analyzed 60 (min) Analyst KLJ Date of Analysis 10/19/99 Other Information 2001 With-Project PM Peak Hour. Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----No. Lanes 0 2 < 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 797 33 1659 26 PHF . 9 . 9 . 9 . 9 Grade 0 0 0 MC' s (%) SU/RV' s (%) CV' s (o) PCE ' s 1 . 10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5 .50 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5 . 50 2 . 60 Through' Traffic Minor Road 6 . 50 3 .30 Left Turn Minor Road 7 . 00 3 .40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1f THDDPM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1 : RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 462 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 808 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 808 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0 . 96 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) 4 . 6 WB R 32 808 4 . 6 0 . 0 A Intersection Delay = 0 . 0 sec/veh Appendix B Phasing Alternatives at Williams Avenue S/S Grady Way S Grady Way &Williams Av S 2001 With-Project AM Peak Hour(NB/SB Permitted Lefts) ' Lanes,Volumes,Timings Lane Group ' EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tl 11 ft 'I r 4 r Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 -, Lane Width (ft) 11 11 12 12 11 11 12 12 12 16 12 12 1 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length '(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Frt Protected ; 0.997 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 i FIt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.968 Satd. Flow(prot) 0 3591 0 1752 3566 0 1770 0 1583 0 1821 1599 Frt Perm. 0.997 0.826 0.826 0.826 0.826 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.877 0.950 0.980 Satd. Flow(perm) 0 3591 0 1752 3566 0 1634 0 1539 0 1844 1554 Headway Factor 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1 Volume(vph) 0 598 11 26 648 0 65 0 15 20 10 225 Confl. Peds. (#/br) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) 0 664 12 29 720 0 72 0 17 22 11 250 Lane Util. Factor 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 710 0 29 756 0 72 0 17 0 33 250 Perm or Prot? ' Perm Prot Perm Pm+Ov Perm Perm Phase Number 2 1 6 8 8 Phase Lagging?, Lag Lead Can Lead or Lag? Maximum Split(s) 73 11 84 36 36 Maximum Split(%) 61% 9% 70% 30% 30% a Minimum Split(s) 20 8 20 20 20 Yellow Time(s) 4 , 4 4 4 4 Lost Time(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.58 0.07 0.68 0.28 0.34 0.28 0.28 Lane Grp Cap(vph) .2095 117 2407 449 529 507 427 V/C Ratio 10.34 0.25 0.31 0.16 0.03 0.07 0.59 V/S Ratio Prot 0.02 0.00 V/S Ratio Perm 0.20 0.21 0.04 0.01 0.02 0.16 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 9.9 40.4 6.1 25.1 18.5 24.4 28.5 Platoon Factor ' 0.38 1.00 0.63 1.00 1.22 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 Webster's St Delay 3.8 40.6 3.9 25.1 22.6 24.4 30.1 LOS A E A D C C D Maximum Green (s) 69 7 80 32 32 Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP=P3000S\Synchro\AM2001 With Permitted.sy5 S Grady Way & Williams Av S 2001 With-Project AM Peak Hour(NB/SB Permitted Lefts) Lanes,Volumes,Timings Li ID LI 1:1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Initial (s) 4 4 4 4 4 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 Recall Mode Coord None Coord None None Walk Time(s) 5 5 5 5 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11 11 11 11 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Natural Cycle: 50 Offset: 18 (15%), Referenced to phase 2-EBT and 6-WBT, Start of Green Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 9 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.38 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.41 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 9.3 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: S Grady Way&Williams Av S 2 Q ii'k `%''4. .5$. .4*:,: +'`"2„R"=t••t w7 'i ii"fi;' • .y ...:� �.�St'.t.v, r YS' ??A;�.:��. .?4.��".�"�-i t..=-,.� (-I 6 11 8 Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP-P3000S\Synchro\AM2001 With_Permitted.sy5 I S Grady Way &Williams Av S 2001 With-Project AM Peak Hour(NB/SB Protected Lefts) 1 Lanes,Volumes,Timings LI LO Li 0 I il;., E Li a Ls o a Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 11 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 �1900 1900 1900 �1900 Lane Width (ft) 11 11 12 12 11 11 12 12 12 16 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(f) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Frt Protected , 0.997 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.968 Satd. Flow(prot) 0 3591 0 1752 3566 0 1770 0 1583 0 1821 1599 Frt Perm. 0.997 0.826 0.826 0.826 0.826 Fit Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.968 Satd. Flow(perm) 0 3591 0 1752 3566 0 1770 0 1539 0 1821 1554 Headway Factor 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Volume(vph) 1 0 598 11 26 648 0 65 0 15 20 10 225 1 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) 0 664 12 29 720 0 72 0 17 22 11 250 Lane Util. Facto 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 710 0 29 756 0 72 0 17 0 33 250 Perm or Prot? ! Perm Prot Prot Pm+Ov Prot Perm Phase Number 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Phase Lagging? Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lag Can Lead or Lag? Maximum Split(s) 58 11 69 15 40 11 36 Maximum Split(%) 48% 9% 58% 13% 33% 9% 30% Minimum Split(s) 20 8 20 8 20 8 20 1 Yellow Time (s) ' 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Lost Time (s) 1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio I 0.46 0.07 0.55 0.10 0.38 0.34 0.28 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 1646 117 1961 177 580 127 427 V/C Ratio 0.43 0.25 0.39 0.41 0.03 0.26 0.59 - V/S Ratio Prot 0.02 0.04 0.00 0.02 V/S Ratio Perm 0.20 0.21 0.01 0.16 Critical LG? 1 Yes Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d11 16.7 40.4 11.7 38.5 16.6 28.4 28.5 Platoon Factor 0.55 1.00 0.70 1.00 1.26 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.9 0.0 0.3 1.5 Webster's St Delay 9.3 40.6 8.2 39.3 21.0 28.6 30.1 LOS 1 B E B D C D D Maximum Greenl(s) 54 7 65 11 36 7 32 Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report 1 TRANSP-P3000S\Synchro\AM2001 With Protected.sy5 S Grady Way &Williams Av S 2001 With-Project AM Peak Hour(NB/SB Protected Lefts) Lanes,Volumes,Timings LIELJEMEILSOLI Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Initial (s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 •3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Recall Mode Coord None Coord None None None None Walk Time (s) 5 5 5 5 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11 11 11 11 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Natural Cycle: 60 Offset: 14 (12%), Referenced to phase 2-EBT and 6-WBT, Start of Green Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 12 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.42 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.46 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 13.7 Intersection LOS: B • Splits and Phases: S Grady Way&Williams Av S £11 — g2 (-I13 j, 4 yy{7y+sue- �p.` _u"^kid;Fdt i�=f.};N€' .';3,5 .,S ie:'fd�t°;�,a`:;�i•'y __ y :,rrx; +^'a7 =:,r5. -*mat °°'at y:1�.� :76i,�t.. 'j.,rr-:• ti��-i'�. �"`;:bx.. ,x� •�°;.': :ti` rya=:- tl: �:�;;�}ak.'�L�' 7Lf`_ !>��`. �� I�" '�":t`�'i. 1; gam:#�tF>x s }. +c 1 y:< f'° 'a 3;; e{ _ a'N%a .*:_ ^ ` Ti v. <?' �'M-C= . ... •.2' 'c`'..=. •£••� 'i�sa;_,.:` 'sA�.}.::o <.,c•:,Csy� 4�0('y K)<.":.tS.ix.`�i r'z �°' -.; FY415�Ya _ '�s;::3 eta.>..c..,..'�`�..... ,l a��''.''..�`�f .. .Y .. ,F '..m; _r4�°�;��`�.`5:.= k.•...^:z ;���..,,:�..,_c;`s,.:•...q. ..cam`.>. ;,?:..P.:...wh.%• tI6 7 jJ8 Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP-P3000S\Synchro\AM2001 With Protected.sy5 S Grady Way &Williams Av S 2001 With-Project AM Peak Hour(NB/SB Split Phasing) Lanes,Volumes,Timings Li Mt OLJELJLINLJLI Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 �1900 1900 1900 �1900 Lane Width (ft) 11 11 12 12 11 11 12 12 12 16 12 12 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Frt Protected 0.997 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.968 Satd. Flow(prot) 0 3591 0 1752 3566 0 1770 0 1583 0 1821 1599 Frt Perm. 0.997 0.826 0.826 0.826 0.826 Fit Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.968 Satd. Flow(perm) 0 3591 0 1752 3566 0 1770 0 1539 0 1821 1554 Headway Factor 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Volume(vph) 0 598 11 26 648 0 65 0 15 20 10 225 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90, 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) 0 664 12 ' 29 720 0 72 0 17 22 11 250 Lane Util. Factor 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 710 0 29 756 0 72 0 17 0 33 250 Perm or Prot? Perm Prot Prot Pm+Ov Prot Perm Phase Number 2 1 6 8 8 4 4 Phase Lagging?; Lag Lead Can Lead or Lag? Maximum Split(s) 51 11 62 22 22 36 36 Maximum Split(%) 43% 9% 52% 18% 18% 30% 30% 1 Minimum Split(s) 20 . 8 20 8 20 8 20 Yellow Time(s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Lost Time(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.40 0.07 0.49 0.16 0.23 0.28 0.28 Lane Grp Cap(viph) 1436 117 1753 280 349 501 427 V/C Ratio 0.49 0.25 0.43 0.26 0.05 0.07 0.59 V/S Ratio Prot 0.02 0.04 0.00 0.02 V/S Ratio Perm 0.20 0.21 0.01 0.16 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 20.5 40.4 15.0 33.7 26.0 24.4 28.5 Platoon Factor 0.43 1.00 0.55 1.00 1.18 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.5 Webster's St Delay 8.9 40.6 8.3 33.8 30.7 24.4 30.1 LOS B E B D D C D Maximum Green'(s) 47 7 58 18 18 32 32 Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP-P3000S\Synchro\AM2001 With_Split.sy5 S Grady Way &Williams Av S 2001 With-Project AM Peak Hour(NB/SB Split Phasing) Lanes,Volumes,Timings MBLILOIAIDEIDEJNIDLI Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Initial (s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Recall Mode Coord None Coord None None None None Walk Time(s) 5 5 5 5 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11 11 11 11 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 • 0 0 0 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Natural Cycle: 70 Offset: 3 (3%), Referenced to phase 2-EBT and 6-WBT, Start of Green Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated • Lost Time: 12 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.42 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.46 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 13.4 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: S Grady Way&Williams Av S •«c'�>n^••�.k�:t4;< ^.' �'f-�••- `•i `�dR>.�E;y���� ,+1R"�..a. �•y.:�`�: ♦ i:'�, ;3', :i<:,�.,.�qei; '�3 �d:`". •,. ..'b:6 ,z�,..�'.3.?�r .., ,.. u. ...,:ins:xr-.•..<r,. :?i:i. _.,..':��::?he. :21&,z.;ifiiY,:�.'�' .�• - • .. 6 8 �. • — Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP-P3000S\Synchro\AM2001 With_Split.sy5 S Grady Way & Williams Av S 2001 With-Project PM Peak Hour(NB/SB Permitted Lefts) Lanes,Volumes,Timings PI .__E 0 Li Li LI Li ii DI N M 11 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +I, +4' 1 r 4' r Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 11 11 12 12 11 11 12 12 12 16 12 12 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Frt Protected 0.997 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 i Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.962 Satd. Flow(prot) 0 3552 0 1736 3532 0 1770 0 1583 0 1792 1583 Frt Perm. 0.996 0.826 0.826 0.826 0.826 FIt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.808 . 0.950 0.973 Satd. Flow(perm) 0 3552 0 1736 3532 0 1505 0 1539 0 1812 1539 Headway Factor 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Volume (vph) 0 862 20 50 417 0 197 0 29 40 11 550 , Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.90 0.92 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% ' Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 4% 4% 4% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) 0 937 22 56 453 0 219 0 32 43 12 598 Lane Util. Factor 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 1007 0 56 476 0 219 0 32 0 55 598 Perm or Prot? Perm Prot Perm Pm+Ov Perm Perm Phase Number 2 1 6 8 4 Phase Lagging? Lag Lead Can Lead or Lag? Maximum Split(s) 46 11 57 63 63 Maximum Split(%) 38% 9% 48% 53% 53% Minimum Split(s) 20 8 20 20 20 Yellow Time(s) 4 4 4 4 4 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.36 0.07 0.45 0.50 0.57 0.50 0.50 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 1273 116 1589 752 875 906 770 V/C Ratio 0.79 0.48 0.30 0.29 0.04 0.06 0.78 V/S Ratio Prot 0.03 0.00 V/S Ratio Perm 0.28 0.13 0.15 0.02 0.03 0.39 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 26.2 41.0 15.9 13.3 7.8 11.7 18.6 Platoon Factor 0.34 1.00 0.76 1.00 1.37 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 2.4 2.5 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 3.5 Webster's St Delay 11.3 43.5 12.2 13.4 10.6 11.7 22.2 LOS B E B B B B C Maximum Green (s) 42 7 53 59 59 Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP=P3000S\Synchro\PM2001 With Permitted.sy5 -I S Grady Way &Williams Av S 2001 With-Project PM Peak Hour(NB/SB Permitted Lefts) Lanes,Volumes,Timings 1'' ,(i I E1 I 1 I f3 FJ Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Initial (s) 4 4 4 4 4 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 Recall Mode Coord None Coord None None Walk Time(s) 5 5 5 • 5 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11 11 11 11 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Natural Cycle: 75 Offset: 76 (63%), Referenced to phase 2-EBT and 6-WBT, Start of Green Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 9 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.70 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.76 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 15.0 Intersection LOS: C Splits and Phases: S Grady Way&Williams Av S �'1 �2 4 ,, s .<:; , i biz •. ',Y::;', :S$ Sb :.F i?� t# y� Se �Ee�s. �--, :i;s°���a�.�.w�:'�r,.r:: ;a,; �=:�s.�p`.'a: '��.; �"d:;c ` _°`�' ''��" t;,s��� z�.w:tw�. ,, ria��rr ..a;�".�,::v >,.� �& �,: �n. g2�y';r. • • :S <�}�^t aV't £ .::z�':'..'%a-;"FYy�eiz: - e.:)4 x._ ;,� `Y$' ._ .". ', ,5` :. 4 �.=,1• .°� ,.� e: ''�� x�'."f �',-T^� � .. �,�..°::, �«'� >°r�'�r• .� ,.•"fit.. °._ ;rr• a s. ?�< ��-; . .=. s.�:> 1.1 6 8 Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP-P3000S\Synchro\PM2001 With Permitted.sy5 S Grady Way &Williams Av S 2001 With-Project PM Peak Hour(NB/SB Protected Lefts) Lanes,Volumes,Timings Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +1 111 ++ 1 r 4 , r Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 11 11 12 12 11 11 12 12 12 16 12 12 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Frt Protected 0.997 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.962 Satd. Flow(prot) 0 3552 0 1736 3532 0 1770 0 1583 0 1792 1583 Frt Perm. 0.996 0.826 0.826 0.826 0.826 Fit Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.962 Satd. Flow(perm) 0 3552 0 1736 3532 0 1770 0 1539 0 1792 1539 Headway Factor 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Volume(vph) 0 862 20 50 417 0 197 0 29 40 11 550 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.90 0.92 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles(%) 3% 3% 3% 4% 4% 4% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) 0 937 22 56 453 0 219 0 32 43 12 598 Lane Util. Factor 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 1007 0 56 476 0 219 0 32 0 55 598 Perm or Prot? Perm Prot Prot Pm+Ov Prot Perm Phase Number 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Phase Lagging? Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lag Can Lead or Lag? Maximum Split(s) 41 8 49 19 59 12 52 Maximum Split(%) 34% 7% 41% 16% 49% 10% 43% Minimum Split(s) 20 8 20 8 20 8 20 Yellow Time(s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Lost Time(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.32 0.04 0.38 0.13 0.51 0.08 0.41 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1125 72 1354 236 784 134 628 V/C Ratio 0.90 0.77 0.35 0.93 0.04 0.41 0.95 V/S Ratio Prot 0.03 0.12 0.00 0.03 V/S Ratio Perm 0.28 0.13 0.02 0.39 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 29.7 43.3 20.0 39.1 10.2 40.3 26.1 Platoon Factor 0.56 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 6.8 25.5 0.1 28.1 0.0 1.2 18.0 Webster's St Delay 23.4 68.7 20.1 67.2 10.2 41.4 44.1 LOS C F C F B E E Maximum Green (s) 37 4 45 15 55 8 48 Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP-P3000S\Synchro\PM2001 With Protected.sy5 S Grady Way &Williams Av S 2001 With-Project PM Peak Hour(NB/SB Protected Lefts) , Lanes,Volumes,Timings ILIBLILILJLIE LINME Lane Group EBL EBTEBR WBL WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Initial (s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Recall Mode Coord None Coord None None None None Walk Time (s) 5 5 5 5 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11 11 11 11 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Natural Cycle: 100 Offset: 80 (67%), Referenced to phase 2-EBT and 6-WBT, Start of Green - Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 12 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.83 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.92 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 33.0 Intersection LOS: D Splits and Phases: S Grady Way &Williams Av S ell 2 3 4 �(, 1 3:s: < ti. ;,`G;S; y:a._ y�:m8 4aii h•'_ :,,#'' $r t u ':a i m n7: d i 'ti_,�:"),;'M 31,;:o: �; film.➢fi;; �5;^�,i, :�t�+<.Fii'tt.: i-4',e�'�: R<, i•:" ,P2-2,# yb.s-4 s..<i<r<awA< w::i a .N� �%A2 6, il•:..S,w.••w ,, _ F., � e33 i.4 e -:£.ZiS",..ve ,14 `,, 'f:'xl:<'CP�'A...f# ;5..'.^^-"$::$ .-; '4 ..-� ....e'a^. ..va�. :r?�;3.`i�' !�"�E'i<..:b;::� �`:'.:ic;:�*;�5�'�`a� .-, t,-.Vie' "-.•)� '<�., .,.'vx'�.ar��=•' x�`f:'?vs'. �,;�'- ,�Q-`•S.}.�'-.,`>N3a:�?.:�r;,�s�::t�,a'�;N ':..h._ �,qh 1.. ��,• :- ;:��`-:,::a•a.4 XSY:r'r� -�,:�1;}A:.",'a;c ::.5-§'s•w-; •:T•+:n:' ..i.:!::si..�,: =�.'.1.. .>�.:3 3er:a °:�a l.. 131.4 �, . •'Will, rr.:^:a •:�.. } �` :€1".*T: ,Sa,g': :'.r;�,e •,�Hsi:�:a�`#'.;§:t ::� .�is�S.. � rea �; 4r .r a;, .ca.�'`m'i •- tz�av<,. zi�J :s��'»,�'...;:..'R� .� �'€': .....� _.z:I�� a-.. si= 3 _- r a•• .,�.< ;,m�i �,;:-...,#BY;aa` : <'9'�•. '��:az <.h:,a^. S'b�.^>?t'." 6 7 8 Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP-P3000S\Synchro\PM2001 With_Protected.sy5 S Grady Way &Williams Av S 2001 With-Project PM Peak Hour(NB/SB Sp1itlPhasing) Lanes,Volumes,Timings El El LI Li Li LI LI El El LE Li El Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 11 44 '1 r 41 r Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 11 11 12 12 11 11 12 12 12 16 12 12 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Frt Protected 0.997 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.962 Satd. Flow(prot) 0 3552 0 1736 3532 0 1770 0 1583 0 1792 1583 Frt Perm. 0.996 0.826 0.826 0.826 0.826 FIt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.962 Satd. Flow(perm) 0 3552 0 1736 3532 0 1770 0 1539 0 1792 1539 Headway Factor 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Volume (vph) 0 862 20 50 417 0 197 0 29 40 11 550 Conti. Peds. (#/hr) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.90 0.92 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 4% 4% 4% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) 0 937 22 56 453 0 219 0 32 43 12 598 Lane Util. Factor 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 1007 0 56 476 0 219 0 32 0 55 598 Perm or Prot? Perm Prot Prot Pm+Ov Prot Perm Phase Number 2 1 6 8 8 4 4 Phase Lagging? Lag Lead Can Lead or Lag? Maximum Split(s) 40 8 48 20 20 52 52 Maximum Split(%) 33% 7% 40% 17% 17% 43% 43% Minimum Split(s) 20 8 20 8 20 8 20 Yellow Time (s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.31 0.04 0.38 0.14 0.18 0.41 0.41 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1095 72 1324 251 284 732 628 V/C Ratio 0.92 0.77 0.36 0.87 0.11 0.08 0.95 - V/S Ratio Prot 0.03 0.12 0.00 0.03 V/S Ratio Perm 0.28 0.13 0.02 0.39 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 30.4 43.3 20.6 38.3 29.2 16.5 26.1 Platoon Factor 0.57 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 8.9 25.5 0.1 18.6 0.0 0.0 18.0 Webster's St Delay 26.2 68.7 20.6 57.0 29.2 16.5 44.1 LOS D F C E D C E Maximum Green (s) 36 4 44 16 16 48 48 Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP-P3000S\Synchro\PM2001 With Split.sy5 S Grady Way & Williams Av S 2001 With-Project PM Peak Hour(NB/SB Split Phasing) Lanes,Volumes,Timings Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Initial (s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Recall Mode Coord None Coord None None None None Walk Time (s) 5 5 5 5 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11 11 11 11 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Natural Cycle: 110 Offset: 81 (68%), Referenced to phase 2-EBT and 6-WBT, Start of Green Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 12 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.83 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.92 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 33.0 Intersection LOS: D Splits and Phases: S Grady Way&Williams Av S '` 1Z 4 ' r�, y .;, 52,,E-.<;' F. ...::.. a,,,.• .4:..: �_� a `"T�s. - :n`� x,�n.�=< ... <+asap_ t ..<<�^"�I":`:4.:. 4"��'' `�''Lt.;> .r. :$.,,„,,r-,' .- ate: = u. ;a^o,: zaa rir §3-�.«.: '� �mrz3'r,'•, 6 _, E�' 8 Renton Home Depot(99852.00) Synchro Report TRANSP-P3000S\Synchro\PM2001 With_Split.sy5 Appendix C Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis at Williams Avenue S/S Grady Way i 68!C 'gad 6-OP 4C-10.2 Warrant 10, Peak Hour Delay The peak hour delay warrant is intended for application where traffic conditions are such that for one hour of the day minor street traffic suffers undue delay in entering or crossing the major street. The peak hour delay warrant is satisfied when the conditions given below exist for one hour (any four consecutive 15-minute periods) of an average weekday. z MINOR STREET The peak hour delay warrant is met when: HIGH VOLUME APPROACH — VPH IV-20(c) 1. The total delay experienced by the traffic on one minor street Rev.a 8 N w . 8 approach(one direction only)controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds _ -0 g 0 0 0 0 0 o four vehicle-hours for a one-lane approach and five vehicle hours for a 1-11 1 o< z two-lane approach, and = > = > 2. The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) o=> equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for * -ro Do o C two moving lanes, and o = 3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds - -I rn 800 vph for intersections with four (or more) approaches or 650 vph for m m P7 intersections with three approaches. O a m H o ".��rrrr10 4C-10.3 Warrant 11, Peak Hour Volume � m I � D o o W The peak hour volume warrant is also intended for application when traffic conditions are such that for one hour of the day minor street traffic 2 m 1 D o = suffers undue traffic delay in entering or crossing the major street. z r- 00 rv— p The peak hour volume warrant is satisfied when the plotted point .) -i m m N O C representing the vehicles per hour on the major street (total of both 23 m > _ % 70— approaches) and the corresponding vehicle per hour of the higher volume IV-20(c) z CO �' C minor street approach (one direction only) for one hour (any four Rev.4 0 0 0 No H r-�73— O� consecutive 15-minute periods) of an average day falls above the curve in S p I o 1 > C Figure 4-5 for the existing combination of approach lanes. 0 i., > ric.• z— When the 85th percentile speed of major street traffic exceeds 40 mph or = m -D rn when the intersection lies within a built-up area of an isolated community v � -2m g _ having a population less than 10,000, the peak hour volume requirements c) 0 j 4' is satisfied when the plotted point referred to above falls above the curve D n !!‘ n—,`'' Mi in Figure 4-6 for the existing combination of approach lanes. Z , 0 cn o m- 4C-11 Factors Governing Selection of Type of Control 2 m D 0 The principal factors that may lead to the favorable consideration of D or C `� traffic-actuated control in the selection of the type of signal control Z 0 m -o :N include: m = oo 1. Low, fluctuating or unbalanced traffic volumes. o * * -. 2. High side street traffic volumes and delays only during the peak hours. 3. The pedestrian or accident warrant is the only warrant which is met. 4. The installation is to provide for one-way movement of two-way traffic. 5. The installation is at a non-intersection location. Appendix D Auxiliary Lane Warrant Analyses at Site Access Driveways U co LEFT TURN STORAGE GUIDELINES A C Unsignalized intersection I Two - lane highway 25 - KEYS • O Below curve, • - storage not >E �• needed for v) 20 m u 9 capacity. • r c - o 0 0 o •c _ 3 3 3 Above curve, L ' -o - storage • * recommended. , - Ac o .- i ti- N • o 1,0 -I- - n 0 _. 1! o, 10 _ �. c rl, _ ti N L �� A� - 7/0 ?'x 1P/f4,9t M • • . * s‘ i = 5 - PP- - o /�M /fi2.�660, �j _ o - N 0 13 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 • 1000 1100 1200 o Total DHV* ft 1 Q c *DHV is total volume from both directions. Current year volume may be used on 3-R Projects. y **Speeds are posted speed limits. Intersections • RIGHT- TURN LANE GUIDELINES pp 100 I I I I I Right-Turn Lane (Figure 910-lib) 80 - Right-Turn Pocket or Recommended CD Taper Taper (Figure 910-11a) Recommended GO - 40 - CC lL -\ 20- • = Radius Only Recommended Q,2-'1) a �M(30 1 o) oEfitc \ x. a_ 0 100 200 3 0 400 500 600 700 PEAK HOUR APPROACH VOLUME ( DDHV ) * * For two- lane highways use the peak hour approach volume ( through + right turn) . For multilane, high speed ( Posted at 45 MPH or above ) highways , use the right- lane peak hour approach volume (through + right turn). For 3-R projects, use current year volumes. Note:When all three of the following conditions are . met, the DDHV is reduced by 20 VPHO 1 . Posted speed 45 MPH or under . 20 Right-turn volume greater than 40 VPHO 3 . Total approach volume less than 300 VPHO Right-Turn Lane Guidelines Figure 910-10 Page 910-46 Design Manual March 1994 Intersections RIGHT- TURN LANE GUIDELINES 0 o 100 1 1 I i 1 I 6. V w th :n ' ___I8 _ RightTurn Pocket or ded Y Taper (Figure 910-11a) Recommended 60 - ( s601— pAi poilie . i \ LD 40 - k' cc 0(/ 9-; W) . 'k CC 0 20 - = Radius Only Recommended Q w W I i I 1 1 ______11 N a_ 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 `` PEAK HOUR APPROACH VOLUME ( DDHV ) * s For two- lane highways use the peak hour approach volume ( through + right turn ) o For multilane, high speed ( Posted at 45 MPH or above) highways , use the right- lane peak hour approach volume (through + right turn). For 3-R projects, use current year volumes. Note:When all three of the following conditions are met , the DDHV is reduced by 20 VPHO 1 . Posted speed 45 MPH or under . 20 Right- turn volume greater than 90 VPHO 30 Total approach volume less than 300 VPH . Right-Turn Lane Guidelines Figure 910-10 1 Page 910-46 Design Manual March 1994 Intersections 1 4 4 RIGHT- TURN LANE GUIDELINES = J v 0 100 I I I I I I �` w Right-Turn Lane (Figure 910-11b) __I8 - Right-Turn Pocket or Recommended 0 Taper (Figure 910-11o) Recommended i 60 - - 0 k - sue, 5-- \ A n.m PE�TL tY 0 20 - - = Radius Only Recommended Y � Q w I 1 I L _I N 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 ' 0 PEAK HOUR APPROACH VOLUME ( DDHV ) * • * For two- lane highways use the peak hour approach volume ( through + right turn ) . For multilane9 high speed ( Posted at 45 MPH or above ) highways , use the right- lane peak hour approach volume (through + right turn). For 3-R projects, use current year volumes. Note:When al I three of the following conditions are met, the DDHV is reduced by 20 VPHO 1 . Posted speed 45 MPH or under . 2 . Right- turn volume greater than 90 VPHO 3 . Total approach volume less than 300 VPHO Right-Turn Lane Guidelines Figure 910-10 ` Page 910-46 Design Manual March 1994 ' I I I � I 1 I , 1 ' -I 1 , I 1 , I i I 1 i I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I I I r 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 I , ' I I I 1 1 i I I I 1 ' 1 1 1 1 ' 1 1 1 I I I ' ' I I I I I , 1 1 , , I I - - I I , 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I J I I I 1 I 1 I I , ' , I 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 ' I I 7� 1 IIIC Transpo I I II Group J I I I I I I ' I J ' I * 11730 118TH AVENUE NE I SUITE 600 I KIRKLAND, WA 98034-7120 J I TEL 425. 821. 3665 I FAX 425. 825. 8434 I 1 I � ! 451 (4) I I I I - s` I I , rl 7 • I , 71/1 i I � I :g„4 - - THE TRANSPO GROUP - ' I I , I , I I I I I , � I TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS' • • for Renton Home Depot' i I I I i I Prepared for: Home Depot USA, Inc.; I I I I I � - O oAM November 4, 1999 oFR,off j I �^� it, I I I I I I I I I ' i I I � I I I I I ' , I I � I ' - I I I TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS for Renton Home Depot Prepared for: Home Depot USA, Inc. November 4, 1999 Prepared by: The Transpo Group, Inc. 11730 118th Avenue NE, Suite 600 Kirkland, Washington 98034-7120 (425) 821-3665 FAX: (425) 825-8434 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 Project Location and Description 1 Study Scope and Organization 1 EXISTING AND FUTURE WITHOUT-PROJECT CONDITIONS 5 Street Network 5 Traffic Volumes 7 Traffic Operations 10 Transit Service 11 PROJECT IMPACTS 12 Project Trip Generation 12 Project Trip Distribution and Assignment 13 Traffic Volume Impact 13 Traffic Operations Impact 17 Site Access Analysis 20 On-Site Parking Analysis 25 Frontage Improvements 25 Transit Impacts 26 MITIGATION MEASURES 27 APPENDICES-provided under separate report FIGURES 1. Site Vicinity 3 2. Site Plan 4 3. Existing Roadway Network Characteristics 6 4. Existing Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 8 5. 2001 Without-Project Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 9 6. Project Trip Distribution-AM and PM Peak Hours 14 . Site-Generated Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 15 8. 2001 With-Project Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 16 9. Preliminary Channelization on S Grady Way 21 TABLES 1. Existing and 2001 Without-Project Levels of Service—AM Peak Hour 10 2. Existing and 2001 Without-Project Levels of Service—PM Peak Hour 11 3. Project Trip Generation Estimates' 13 4. Project Traffic Impacts at Study Intersections 17 5. Existing, 2001 Without- and With-Project Level of Service—AM Peak Hour 18 6. Existing, 2001 Without- and With-Project Levels of Service—PM Peak Hour 18 7. Phasing Alternatives at the Williams Avenue S/S Grady Way Intersection 19 8. 2001 With-Project Driveway Levels of Service Summary 22 9. Queuing Analysis along S Grady Way 23 Traffic Impact Analysis for Renton Home Depot November 4, 1999 INTRODUCTION This report summarizes the traffic impact analysis prepared for the proposed Home Depot store, located on the southeast corner of the Talbot Road S/S Grady Way intersection in Renton, Washington. The purpose of this analysis is to identify potential transportation- related impacts associated with the proposed development and to identify measures to mitigate these impacts. Project Location and Description ,The 16-acre site is bounded on the east and south by Interstate 405, with a vegetated embankment to Benson Road S adjacent to the site on the east. To the north and east is Renton City Hall with offices located to the west across Talbot Road S. Figure 1 illustrates the site vicinity. The existing site contains buildings totaling 81,241 gross square feet (gsf), which were previously used by Puget Sound Energy (PSE) operations. All on-site operations have been suspended for about a year, and the site is currently used for storage and maintenance of electrical and gas equipment. The existing PSE buildings would be demolished as part of the proposed Home Depot project. The project is expected to be completed by 2001 and would include the construction of a Home Depot store totaling approximately 132,000 gsf, which includes a 117,000 gsf main building and 15,000 gsf Garden Center. Patrons and employees would be served by 612 parking stalls. Figure 2 illustrates the project's proposed site plan. Vehicular access to/from the site would be provided via three driveways, including one right-in/right-out driveway on Talbot Road S, one right-in/right-out driveway on S Grady Way, and one signalized full- turning movement driveway at the Williams Avenue S/S Grady Way intersection. Due to the proposed signalization of this intersection, and its proximity to City Hall's access driveway, outbound left-turning traffic from the City Hall driveway would be restricted onto S Grady Way; this traffic would shift to the proposed traffic signal via a connection through City Hall's planned surface parking lot. Study,Scope and Organization The scope of the analysis was coordinated in advance with City of Renton staff. The study area includes both signalized and unsignalized intersections along the S Grady Way corridor. Overall, six intersections were identified for evaluation. These include the intersections at which potential traffic impacts could occur, including: I1. Rainier Avenue S/S Grady Way (signalized) 2. Talbot Road S/S Grady Way (signalized) 3. Williams Avenue S/S Grady Way (unsignalized, signalization proposed) 4. Renton City Hall Driveway/S Grady Way (unsignalized) 5. Wells Avenue S/S Grady Way (unsignalized) 6. Main Avenue S-Benson Road S/S Grady Way (signalized) M:199199852iWP199852R1.Doc ©The Transpo Group,Inc.1999 Page 1 Traffic Impact Analysis for Renton Home Depot November 4, 1999 Traffic conditions during the weekday AM and PM peak hours were evaluated at each study intersection to assess project impacts. The AM and PM peak hour conditions represent the time periods when surrounding street system traffic is at its highest, and thus, cumulative traffic conditions with project traffic would be greatest. The weekday AM and PM peak hours include operating conditions on Monday through Friday and do not include Saturdays or Sundays. Although traffic generated by the proposed Home Depot store would be greater on weekend days, the combination of background and project-generated traffic would be less than weekday AM and PM peak hours. Thus, traffic impacts and mitigation measures were evaluated for the weekday peak hours only, which is consistent with City of Renton development review guidelines. M:199199852IIWP199852R1.DOC ©The Transpo Group,Inc. 1999 Page 2 N • H g s :`,\\r Jfl e•.°— `7,./ i •• 48 :.„_ h� 7 " ` ` rA it v 5) kt' c _ 2 n5, W , ;tit m • 3y "._.3;. - �y zb _ :. 1 � . ' 4 ^ 4 �i� r` r,�' XM1 i?E� ? j,^ •1" \ ; • a ��8c ¢—f<t `�\' t,t ^ f, 474%. ; 5Ki..k }'_''$ ° i of w sc , . �t'.-. ,I1Jj. ' a Y. S the $ 3 r��./t 1 A . a%f"..li J �� �e t T •n:R , 4 . rr.; ,� :y- �'' rsta4a ,y 5 '.e rr < a i "'< t: ' f'' ,g • ." = a .0yet r)--- : : '..,;'''.:1.,-�,N441111 "v... ' y ,�..,,e.7<' i 3 4 s Ea?t . ,: �3i"L.""'r? a'v f sat."�'r E :.yam;.x^� t,} t Y � � .8, Y,,�' , .rw`;,..,*ILL; "".^L;. '' • ,,,::. ,T t �,��JtP i ;S r � S �i \^ :-*,r •. (5m t�rc o�M1 ,' '%.SN 7tu $' ° GT • fg tt' a t;:citY+ f ".' a ; Ms- (Z " 'r 'tr , `k5r i F,s,^ » `P1 r "�i' Ili '4 e`'r _a..: .+•`: i.,:. t - `.. " Qitl'�e} !P E hr ' • ,' '�7'„'t'. :t_:='.: • xx, r .3 e �,.,}"i: ? A t't.a r • w a.*wi:. -. ' .,\44, 1: � µ - ��y i °si fA w"U"t <- . ���l�t# mot. a I. a'Y,�� '..U.',,J ,,AI tg `_..':"" "c. _S "$y , • •.',„ .... ..,.,E ,. ..!,,,,„;.:v.. •fR.F era u c to _ f wr is %1 1 r ' .. M1 "4411� -}0 „1..,,11 $•s s \:.• `s r-,, .rl,.1 ;r c/ Sa :�t.. sy- _�qs SdiP tit .7y,,, 4 4. S: •-5 ca##,s'.. ? :. I 5....?S'� l • ttJ,----- / Za t .�x.,- }d�:F'.':'.;'iYs^' •js ` -t,._ $ �` r'r rS,� pe`a'F C s Fsr. 15i' S, ;m %. _ e.t C.:c�.+fRe•\CF k ,^1 :(f • 1 .i t': • \ : • £-=1,�FM.s-77_4ti f—�1•; _2 .i I-:.-# - ..�' et' -�� 1'tt ,L;.' .`'rrs • • t��"S-{- 1`•xt j 15tAg.•` ' `Yi t7 S��<,ti s� 4. ,� ~ s t _ �� 11 yyd `.t.- r i; ajs.`e',%'u'' 's Y. s!.g,� yF-�`..g 1w,ri? <33 T DTP,,, .>•t -'k r f /�� N& -i° ' •.t! '-'? i :i. . s. '`yi''.;>:_.-.__ '. t' s-_ �' ! 'Yx"s Y... i:s..!:S?n:a, iiator • • 'irer�': '�iS7` �'..'_. .. 1 .. ,_ e.:3: ,,,,,...1„,j .3 �'t%v., '>°^i '%/tia_�s- ,<:t'.�s <vj ,. .t3ai4iil ",f` i•:,,• :ram`. C?Rc` ;:�:r( Al , ` 3.' .. .f` E .:,.. i , r�— • • c ":Ai zu^s zii a__ —`` "� :i E • y �ie %i . �,�p, 77 _i �.._._.._..�t _� .; ��_.___ � �. • .• 1` "�`E'_fit_.._"..�`.` :..1.:Ltitf..:�:. ;f � `-__- __._._._. _ s_- ..__.._.. Si.iF '"-'^ 't.' ` .,.. '• . . €;' :gf., '�' =;S'�'.°^• �w 2.;v&:' J. ^ig _ f ...... a. ' 2•,stri �"- ^3�•Y c '�l .S 2x:a. c� :;a .`"7M S: r _' r N» .1 ♦ 0 . t ` F A c^+s �,8;•: I. i is t•;. v:r` i'.i Y',i� 2. oa—i—� _ t:,: t f .... 3v 2>i:t s-:. 4.s°`. , „ gi,..„'' _' _� 1 i , A f r� i,fr8 ''e '',,,,'',. 74. i ,1✓. 1- .\ c` t i s E ,r '`'; _'1 'i KA`'. 1. r ' • X :Azi ° 1 -, r �r> 71 '..q.. :.''-'1* , h?Y:d.N,7fti:°,i}u"bt..:i" t- ' �� `�?S'�S! """, 'r:e., - ... s`_ __ .. _...:.. t •.^ i • S7 �[Si -'�. ;+. �, �.r: x �� _.3.N !+v ,4o,r: _ I $$[, 't ot LI.iYa K1 x>i "'sr' ,I:• • '.i- .iv:.: �., J. E't+� '/` , '':�^• ' p1+- .J --y. tier t° m< .4". -1 - St `4'•: F ;.a39 .::i5t?y r: tx., y' ', a ' r_w 'i 1, 1", �' i ! ..":1t'7 a-iii.$' ,4 'i w,.A,,1,a�,12:7 . 1:, j • a '+' '- 'a• a .a. ' s� $: i l k .,. 1 t L 1 `ffi% s���^S<8¢,t':Cr:��..=c < :a =` .� tiv i �s ll i ... � .'..•.11„315 f f5' S6TY.55,,, Y �tf _f& _• f- : JS} ! �' .ely ?f ..�j• x, 4.i ... . _ .amp; „,; qi ``��.. � t d y I( S� ^^mot' k (U �., -"'I Sa...,'¢,,,-_ t- s 1 _:7,—,, ! !! eo rt „;''-' a j. v' ,,; z417, °., ry 'r 1 ''fat t- tear., rt'V s ` � .,x ;n :',' ,>.:,: .j; s �; __ stry;': - ...�T__ iq .�., (a f7et 1 t K SE kfriit j ST 'Sz{' V rY-'i i y i S, ,;: st t.,r.y;� :'{•4Y.11.7, l: _ —i-_._ we u v,, sg,,rnr,S' 'i ��'., u C ..--- rr ---.5`'-"_-.:-,�.e7Yl,j�t,.,T^ SE iAEn,z Vs ; 4 _ ,?,r: ST j 5_!N Y7 5"s�` _,:v $L'Vaf,4t• � i ___ s! � - x` Ms t .,,s ti _ r x .i ;YFN�T ( ''S r+.+.. i a .:.,'�. <. i�sss.M1 4'� f i. I ' :rig.s,gl •e.t. _: .vsg2: u,1.,; s :,i S � ,3G.-:, i .. �P< \.�1.�� 'ar,.,'��i i :t; G;k<,,`.\rF�/i(. -- li! ._ } '' .',-— ''-...-• t>T,r...a�t$s' 9 _ .. ,.<tl::i ._..._?.- 5t i52k?-, 1C 5- S�K. "i F _,"?SiF M1 'uK , <_ i•.. f "� k .:i lid _ .,,,I;S:S::w. 3. 1 1 ._.pEer :, '1 .v.t9(74 ' ,_ Y ., :. -.«........_ sit 7477 N _._.____. _ ..._ _ ..,,, , - Reproduced with permission granted by THOMAS BROS.MAPS®. This map is copyrighted by THOMAS BROS.MAPS®. It is unlawful to copy or reproduce all or any part thereof for personal use or resale,without permission. All rights reserved »'The: Figure 1 an��s,,p�,o . Site Vicinity �r .�" Renton Home Depot M:1991998521cadlvicinity.cdr 01) N W Q RENTON `� CITY HALL 1 5 1/ /,,/ I I I I I I I l l(flll�� 1 / 0 / / / ill = /,/°'/ ,,\ ,. , /64's- ,, , :A-i.im � THE HOME DEPOT • _L► \ i h i o • / Qt 40i* <„ \� ,1 , firanspoll.................................................. s ` < < '' Figure 2 Site Plan ><s> Renton Home Depot (A)M:1991998521Cadlgraphic2 Idk 11/04/99 11:23 i Traffic Impact Analysis for Renton Home Depot November 4, 1999 EXISTING AND FUTURE WITHOUT-PROJECT CONDITIONS This section of the report describes both existing and future year 2001 without-project conditions in the vicinity of the project site, including the surrounding street network, traffic volumes, traffic operations, and transit service. Street Network Existing Street System Existing roadway and intersection characteristics and channelization are illustrated in Figure 3 and are described in detail below. S Grady Way is a 5-lane principal arterial with a posted speed limit of 35 miles per hour (mph). This roadway is also classified as State Route (SR) 515 between Talbot Road S and Main Avenue S-Benson Road S adjacent to the site. On-street parking is prohibited along this roadway. The signalized study intersections along S Grady Way include Rainier Avenue S, Talbot Road S, and Main Avenue S-Benson Road S. Rainier Avenue S (SR 167)is a 7-lane principal arterial with a posted speed limit of 35 mph north of S Grady Way. South of S Grady Way, SR 167 transitions to a freeway with two travel lanes and one high-occupancy-vehicle (HOV) lane in each direction and a posted speed limit of 60 mph. On-street parking is prohibited along this roadway. The Rainier Avenue S/S Grady Way intersection is a few hundred feet north of the I-405/SR 167 freeway interchange. Talbot Road S is a 5-lane principal arterial with a posted speed limit of 35 mph. This roadway is also classified as SR 515 south of S Grady Way. Like S Grady Way and Talbot Road S; on-street parking is prohibited. Talbot Road S widens to six lanes at the south leg of the S drady Way intersection. Williams Avenue S is a 2-lane, one-way (southbound), minor arterial with a posted speed limit of 25 mph. On-street parking is allowed on both sides of the street. The southbound approach at S Grady Way is stop-sign controlled and includes one left-turn lane and two right-turn lanes. Wells Avenue S is a 2-lane, one-way (northbound), minor arterial with a posted speed limit of25 mph. Wells Avenue S forms a one-way couplet with Williams Avenue S. On-street parking is allowed on both sides of the street. Main Avenue S(SR 515)is a 4-lane principal arterial with a posted speed limit of 30 mph. At the intersection with S Grady Way, a traffic signal controls the southbound approach onto Benson Road S, while the southbound-to-westbound movement onto S Grady Way is uncontrolled. The south leg of this intersection is Benson Road S. M:1991998521WP199852R1.DOC ©The Transpo Group,Inc. 999 Page 5 9 1 __, 0 C) ' C.) 1L \_.,, -J L CO ii /(___.) ___t__ � NOT TO SCALE ) \>\\( PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL 4 LANES 4 O 30 MPH MINOR ARTERIAL i a r 25 MPH l.1_5) II ► -— 'g €a Is 4 Et ' —TIP- -41-1— coil c"ii v� w is 4�? ' I \i''I g MINOR ARTERIAL 3 g P I&I25 MPH © � -� I 41 OS 6TH ST 5 � � /\.: 0 1 ..,40,,..,......... ..,/ hi 0 2 .<_>• RENTON "� SW 7TH ST J, '' CITY ii ts; HALL f3.4 �s �v: 1 A �t" o 88 ate. EkI :, O Z''W PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL o z �`:,¢ .)-. 5 LANES m Z€ :e'3 Y ��N :s�:.:,.` _ 35 MPH" �1 m 1 1 �' PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL I ,° 5 LANES - s" z> 35 MPH E "0 - MINOR ARTERIAL O 2 LANES 35 MPH -41/ • t �l t Figure 3 Existing Roadway Network Characteristics ': Renton Home Depot (B)M:1991998521Cad\graphic1 Idk 11/02/9914:52 Traffic Impact Analysis for Renton Home Depot November 4, 1999 Benson Road S is a 2-lane minor arterial with a posted speed limit of 35 mph. On- street parking is prohibited along this roadway. The northbound approach at S Grady Way is controlled with a traffic signal and currently operates with a single through lane onto Main Avenue S. This approach will be modified in the future, as described in the Planned Roadway Improve ments section of this report. Planned Street Improvements Based on the City of Renton's 2000-2005 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), nio roadway widening projects are identified within the study area. The TIP does describe the need to perform a comprehensive analysis of short- and long-range transportation improvements in the critical area bounded by S Grady Way, I-405, SR 167, and Talbot Road S, including the intersection of Rainier Avenue S/S Grady Way. According to City staff, potential intersection improvements are currently being evaluated as part of the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) 1-405 Corridor Program. Since a variety of improvements will be evaluated, and the preferred alternative is unknown, this traffic analysis does not incorporate specific improvements at Rainier Avenue S/S Grady Way. Improvements at the intersection of Main Avenue S-Benson Road S/S Grady Way are currently being constructed. By 2000, the northbound approach will include one left-turn lane and one through lane. To accommodate the new left-turning movement, the existing 2- phase traffic signal will operate with 3 phases, including a new phase protecting the northbound-to-westbound left-turning movement. Future without- and with-project levels of service incorporate this intersection improvement. Traffic Volumes (With the exception of Williams Avenue S/S Grady Way (AM peak hour) and Wells Avenue S/S Grady Way (AM and PM peak hours), existing peak hour traffic volumes were collected by the City of Renton in July and August of 1999. The Transpo Group collected existing AM peak hour traffic volumes at Williams Avenue S/S Grady Way in October of 1999 and estimated AM and PM peak hour volumes at Wells Avenue S/S Grady Way based on City counts at Main Avenue S-Benson Road S and S Grady Way. Peak hour turning movement volumes at the existing City Hall driveway on S Grady Way were estimated based on the number of employee parking spaces and employee travel patterns described by City staff. Figure 4 illustrates existing peak hour traffic volumes at study intersections. Future without-project traffic volumes are illustrated in Figure 5. At the direction of City staff, these volumes were estimated by increasing existing volumes by an annually compounded growth rate of 3 percent per year. This percentage is consistent with recent planning-level studies within the City. In addition, the following trips generated by City Hall were accounted for in the future background growth: • New visitor-related trips. These trips were estimated based on the City's recent traffic count at City Hall's existing access driveway on Benson Road S, an annually compounded growth rate of 3 percent per year, and capacity of the new 35-space surface parking lot for visitors. - M:1991998521WP199852R1.DOC ©The Transpo Group,Inc.1999 Page 7 C) 11,200(685) 2 3 (180) 180 -220(95) (15) 25 5 (25) (250)535 40 (20) 44) I I L (75) 640 ,,- 495 (570) J ((110))265 100((145)) (25) 55\�7 N r,315 (175) NOT TO SCALE (190)725 --Pr405(835] (525)785 i 'F' 420(540) (170 500 --)� �` 730 735 (20) 65) � �1 60 200) (255) 615 r 285 (1,035) (445) 140 365(575) (120) 575 320 (1,235) 580(965) I O 111 �,gJ 1 .� of 3n 5 415815 --► � 500465 I PPi (110)20 1 j 15(100) '� i In N1 gP (20)85 85(15) z�" cn w m 3 ©mg 00 ej;i 3f; S 6TH ST O 4E © yz�"::� AY Ps y 2 ( _ RENTON).1SW 7THT 675 505) d' . HALL r•1 f%: / • ip to 1 .Za H1> s1F m (I 5)1 ij 5) 1 1 O865(115) (505)685 (285)615 (20)115 �1 LEGEND (XX) = AM PEAK HOUR I290(765) XX = PM PEAK HOUR • • > ` l <><>> '> <>`i Figure 4 g Existing Peak Hour Traffic Volumes <`' ................... Renton Home Depot (A)M:1991998521Cad\graphiclldk 11/02/9914:52 • i O 1,,255(685) C.) @II (0 90 90 235(100) (15) 25 5 (25) (225)550 40 (20) 1 I J L (80) 680 580 (655) J L r5))280 105((155 (25) 55k f<340 (185) NOT TO SCALE 0)770 --► -•- 430(885) (585)845 --► -•- 525(670) 0))530 1� r 825 830 (20) 70 7 <170 215) (295) 655 r 300 (1,100) (470) 150 390(635) (125) 610 340 (1,310) 615(1,025) O p15 1 3r: (440 865 -► 580 580 j 14 .) 110)20 1 (. 15(100) Ni# �' N '� ri 13 (20)85 85(15) a( " t% _� 3 r {r m 3 it E © �a7:01 �3 1 )...„.., tiil. S 6TH ST 3O _em�_ !i '.'` 7 , / o $ s JRENiON ill s i3 ks R-^°• zr (110)195 _A k_ 10 5) SW 7TH ST e. CITY s 1#i 330)795 -► — 770(645) �___.a.?—As { '"::>:»```«?`3 Ni: HALL € # -r g I < >T > I i>: P t';.A 0 _WAN ms cri:O• NN 1 Zi'w H z c 1 � ¢ O N k,, .5J-- W . I� pp 'a f: ^ c`167 ir1 I �` 11 iii 3 g w g / : : O1920(120) (555)73� (300)670 ._ (20)125 n LEGEND (90)50 (XX) = AM PEAK HOUR 260(725) XX = PM PEAK HOUR Figure5 .::;:.: ::<.>:::<.:::.:>::::.:.: :.::.:.::.::.::. ::: litiiiiiiiiii 2001 Without-Project Peak Hour Traffic Volumes .....,.. . `[> Renton Home Depot (C)MA991998521Cadlgraphic1 Idk 11/02/9914:51 Traffic Impact Analysis for Renton Home Depot November 4, 1999 • New office-related trips. These trips were estimated based on the gross leasable area of City Hall's fourth floor (approximately 17,000 gsf) and average peak hour trip rates published in the ITE Trip Generation manual (Land Use 710—Office). The new visitor- and office-related trips were added in addition to the background growth to account for specifically identified new trips in the study area without the proposed project. These new trips generated by Renton City Hall were developed to account for the specific effects of new trips at an abutting site. Traffic Operations The operational characteristics of an intersection are determined by calculating the intersection's level of service (LOS). The operation of an intersection—as a whole and its individual turning movements—can be described alphabetically with a range of levels of service (LOS A-F), with LOS A indicating free-flowing traffic conditions and LOS F indicating extreme congestion and long vehicle delays. At signalized intersections, level of service is measured in average total delay per vehicle and is typically reported for the intersection as a whole. At unsignalized intersections, level of service is measured in stopped delay per vehicle and is reported for the individual turning movement that experiences the highest delay. Existing and future without-project levels of service, average vehicular delays, and volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratios were calculated at study intersections based on methodologies contained in the Highway Capacity Manual(Transportation Research Board, 1994). The Synchro (v. 3.2) and Highway Capacity Software (v. 2.1f) programs were used to calculate peak hour levels of service at signalized and unsignalized study intersections, respectively. The results of these calculations are illustrated in Tables 1 and 2. Future without-project levels of service, delays, and v/c ratios incorporate the programmed improvements at the Main Avenue S-Benson Road S/S Grady Way intersection. Intersection level of service worksheets for existing and future without-project conditions are contained in Appendix A of this report. Table 1. Existing and 2001 Without-Project Levels of Service—AM Peak Hour Existing Conditions 2001 Without-Project Location LOS1 Delay2 V/C3 LOS Delay V/C Signalized Intersections4 Rainier Ave S/S Grady Wy E 41.1 0.96 E 49.2 1.00 Talbot Rd S/S Grady Wy C 22.2 0.66 C 24.2 0.71 Main Ave S-Benson Rd S/S Grady Wy B 7.6 0.58 B 8.5 0.56 Unsignalized Intersections5 Williams Ave S/S Grady Wy D 22.2 - E 32.1 - • City Hall Driveway/S Grady Wy C 16.4 - D 21.2 - Wells Ave S/S Grady Wy A 5.0 - B 6.3 - 1. LOS=Level of Service(A-F) 2. Delay=Average delay in seconds per vehicle 3. V/C=Critical volume-to-capacity ratio 4. LOS,delays,and v/c ratios at signalized intersections reflect the operation of the intersection as a whole. 5. LOS and delays at unsignalized intersections reflect the tuming movement that experiences the most delay. M:1991998521WP199852R1.DOC ©The Transpo Group,Inc.1999 Page 10 Traffic Impact Analysis for Renton Home Depot November 4, 1999 Table 2. Existing and 2001 Without-Project Levels of Service—PM Peak Hour Existing Conditions 2001 Without-Project Location LOS1 Delay2 V/C3 LOS Delay V/C Signalized Intersections4 Rainier Ave S/S Grady Wy E 42.3 0.96 E 53.4 1.03 Talbot Rd S/S Grady Wy D 27.1 0.80 D 29.4 0.85 Main Ave S-Benson Rd S/S Grady Wy B 10.5 0.78 C 18.8 0.90 Unsignalized Intersections5 Williams Ave S/S Grady Wy E 36.2 - F >45.0 - City Hall Driveway/S Grady Wy F >45.0 - F >45.0 - Wells Ave S/S Grady Wy B 8.0 - C 10.3 - 1. LOS=Level of Service(A-F) 2. Delay=Average delay in seconds per vehicle 3. V/C=Critical volume-to-capacity ratio 4. LOS,delays,and v/c ratios at signalized intersections reflect the operation of the intersection as a whole. 5, LOS and delays at unsignalized intersections reflect the turning movement that experiences the most delay. AM Peak Hour LOS. During the AM peak hour, the existing operations at signalized study intersections range from LOS B at Main Avenue S-Benson Road S/S Grady Way to LOS E at Rainier Avenue S/S Grady Way. All signalized study intersections are anticipated to continue operating at the same level of service as existing by 2001. All individual turning movements at the unsignalized study intersections currently operate in the LOS A-D range, and are anticipate to operate in the LOS B-E range by 2001. Of these locations, the southbound left-turning movement at Williams Avenue S/S Grady Way, which currently operates at LOS D, is expected to operate at LOS E in 2001 (more than 30 seconds). . PM Peak Hour LOS. All of the signalized intersections are anticipated to continue operating at existing PM peak hour level of service, with the exception of Main Avenue S- Benson Road S/S Grady Way, which will degrade from LOS B to LOS C. Unsignalized study intersections currently operate in the LOS B-F range. Specifically, the outbound turns (primarily the left-turning movement) from the City Hall driveway on S Grady Way experiences the most delay in the PM peak hour. Turning movements at the Wells Avenue S and Williams Avenue S intersections currently operate at LOS E or better. By 2001, the southbound left- turning movement at Williams Avenue S/S Grady Way and the northbound left-turning movement at City Hall's access driveway on S Grady Way are anticipated to operate at LOS F. Transit Service The site is well served by King County METRO Transit. The South Renton Park &Ride lot is located within a few blocks of the site; it serves a total of fourteen transit routes. Adjacent to the site, eight of these routes (105, 108, 109, 153, 167, 169, 247, and 280) provide weekday transit service along S Grady Way and four routes (101, 106, 107, and 148) provide service along Talbot Road S. A transit stop also exists on the south side of S Grady Way,just east of Talbot Road S adjacent to the proposed Home Depot site. A bus pull-out lane is also provided for this stop. M .•1991998521WPI99852R1.DOC ©The Transpo Group,Inc.1999 Page 11 Traffic Impact Analysis for Renton Home Depot November 4, 1999 PROJECT IMPACTS This section of the report documents project impacts on the surrounding roadway network. First, site-generated peak hour traffic volumes are estimated, distributed, and assigned to the surrounding roadway network and study intersections. Second, future with- project traffic volumes are projected, traffic volume impacts identified, and peak hour intersection operations evaluated. Third, this section evaluates the peak hour operation, queuing, and auxiliary lane warrants at site access driveways; a traffic signal warrant analysis at Williams Avenue S/S Grady Way, and on-site parking analysis are also documented. Finally, this section concludes with a discussion of required frontage improvements and transit impacts. Project Trip Generation Daily and peak hour trip generation was estimated based on the Puget Sound Home Depot Trip Generation Study prepared by The Transpo Group in October of 1995. This study included analysis of three Home Depot stores in Seattle, Tacoma, and Puyallup, Washington and documented daily and peak hour trip rates. The study identified a weekday daily trip rate of 35.69 trips per 1,000 gsf of building floor area. Peak hour trip rates were 1.49 AM peak hour trips and 2.81 PM peak hour trips per 1,000 gsf, respectively. These rates are comparable to rates identified in ITE Trip Generation. The Home Depot Trip Generation Study was used because it better reflects the trip generation characteristics of Home Depot stores in the greater Puget Sound area. Not all of the driveway trips generated by the proposed project would be new trips to the surrounding roadway network. In general, trips made to a retail development can be divided into two components: pass-by and new trips. The following provides a more detailed description of these trip types: • Pass-By Trips - A trip that is already on the roadway network en route to another destination. Pass-by trips impact the driveway turning movements at access driveways, but not the surrounding street system. • New Trips - A single-purpose trip generated by the proposed project. For purposes of this analysis, new trips to the roadway network are estimated to account for the remainder of the total driveway trips. For this study, it was estimated that between 10 and 35 percent of site-generated traffic would pass-by the site, depending on the time of day. Since convenience-related trips are less prevalent during the AM peak hour, it was estimated that pass-by trips would account for 10 percent of total driveway traffic during this hour. Pass-by rates are typically greater during the commuting PM peak hour, and as such, it was estimated that 35 percent of site-generated traffic would be passing-by the site during this hour. This percentage is consistent with information contained in the Home Depot Trip Generation Study and less than the PM peak hour pass-by percentage published in ITE Trip Generation (48 percent). On an average weekday, it was estimated that 25 percent of project traffic would be attributable to pass-by trips, a reasonable estimate considering the project's pass-by rates during the AM and PM peak hours. These rates were developed in coordination with City Transportation Department staff. Trip generation estimates for the proposed Home Depot store are summarized in Table 3. M:1991998521WP199852R1.DOC ©The Transpo Group,Inc. 1999 Page 12 Traffic Impact Analysis for Renton Home Depot November 4, 1999 Table 3. Project Trip Generation Estimates1 Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Size Trip Total Trip Total Trips Trip Total Trips Home Depot (gsf) Rate Trips Rate Trips (in/out) Rate Trips (in/out) Total Trips 132,000 35.69 4,710 1.49 197 (106/91) 2.81 371 (174/197) Less Pass-By Trips 25% -1,180 10% -20 -(10/10) 35% -130 -(65/65) Net New Trips 3,530 177 (96/81) 241 (109/132) 1. Trip rates based on the Puget Sound Home Depot Trip Generation Study, The Transpo Group,Inc.,October of 1995. As shown in Table 3, the proposed project would generate a total of approximately 4,710 weekdaytrips of which 197 trips would occur duringthe AMpeak hour and 371 trips P would occur during the PM peak hour. Of these trips, 3,530 trips would be considered new trips during an average weekday, with approximately 177 and 241 new trips occurring during the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Note also that the existing site contains buildings totaling 81,241 gsf. Since on-site operations have been suspended for about one year, no credit was given against the Home Depot trip generation to account for the existing on-site uses. However, because this site was operational and generating traffic at the time the City developed their Impact Fee Program (1995), traffic generation from the previously operational on-site uses will be credited against the total impact fees for the Home Depot. Project Trip Distribution and Assignment Project-generated AM and PM peak hour trips were distributed on the surrounding roadway network and at study intersections based on the City's PM peak hour travel demand forecast model. PM peak hour distribution percentages from the model are illustrated in Figure 6. The model distributed approximately: • 40 percent of project traffic to/from the north, • 37 percent to/from the west, and • 23 percent to/from the north. Project traffic was assigned to the study intersections and roadway network based on the above trip distribution percentages. As was described earlier, the outbound left-turning movements from the City Hall driveway on S Grady Way would be restricted as a result of the new signal at the Williams Avenue S/S Grady Way intersection. Figure 7 shows that these trips would shift from the City Hall driveway to the new signalized access location through a new connection provided between City Hall and the Home Depot site. Figure 7 also illustrates AM and PM peak hour project traffic at study intersections and site access driveways. Traffic Volume Impact Site-generated traffic volumes were added to future without-project volumes (shown in Figure 5) to estimate future with-project volumes shown in Figure 8. By comparing future with- and without-project traffic volumes, the relative impacts at study intersections can be identified. Table 4 summarizes the relative AM and PM peak hour traffic volume impacts at study intersections. M:199\998521WP199852Rl.DOc ©The Transpo Group,Inc.1999 Page 13 (h) NOT TO SCALE 1 1 t:ti3 0N N N i i >. k:? il #; 20%{ wgi m _ t fi i t S 6TH ST 0% 3k % : „ 10 RENTON CITY �"" `'`3 ?.�: SW 7TH ST Es A HALL 1.; tt , „:.:ijii!:.!:iiiii.i:!iiiiiiill.111.1 n, s. `t is E_( ri;3 ;i:3 i r, :S; oj`w r Z i � cif i 3 t3 i 67_, )1.1 F�aj 4 30% 18% `_' << Figure ure 6 Project Trip Distribution-AM and PM Peak Hours .............. IIRenton Home Depot (D)M:199199B521Cad\graphic1 la 11/04/9911:31 C.) 0 (0) 2 O C.) 11(10) (0)0 1 0(0) (10) 20 10 (6) (0)0 I 0(0) N (0) 09'. _f 3 43 (5) J L NOT TO SCALE 06 8 0 i & 0 0 - --- 9 63 13 17 -408 -22)* 0 0 40€24) (0) 0), <_3 (_1) (11)20( ) -1- ---1 ) ( 50(26) r (35) 50 3 (2) r (0)0 32(29) (0 -10 13 (8) (65) 197 29(15) 0(0) O *NEGATIVE VALUES AT THE CITY HALL DRIVEWAY (INTERSECTION #4) REFLECT THE RESTRICTION OF OUTBOUND LEFT TURNS DUE TO THE NEW 2 4,4 SIGNAL AT WILLIAMS AVE (INTERSECTION #3). ram"\ a \J1 5 11;_ - 1 - (;{ 28 46 - — 27(24 Es iii ((0)0 -) r 0(0)) v, v" i1 es *(-20)-85 0(0) 1.,., a i:i'( co 3 s sj;` 4 '` '''`? 5 S 6TH sT rg A\_, f' / 7:739-4 xer... RENTON j PP (8)13 _ 0(0)) SW 7TH STo CITY di (20)33 -s- 27((24 ,J' 417... :;::s >>>:: HALL .,v} iis 3 ill 1. 50** col cif w v� -'-:- o} cr i g Z:u w i—`3 �f( .T.+r am ¢#j ,, Fs # G�0 "" fi'i i t t'f 1 ) ,, 41 iti::1 1 crr ti ® 0(0) O O (19)22 226 (16) (15) 24 (16)26 (4)7 (35)60(9) — F 89(43) -41 r ' -13-(47) (5)5 30(15) LEGEND (XX) = AM PEAK HOUR 0(0) XX = PM PEAK HOUR _ � Figure 7 inoSite-Generated Peak Hour Traffic Volumes iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiIiiiiiiiiiiiilitiniiiiPiiiiii Renton Home Depot (E)M:1991998521Cad\graphicl Idk 11/04/9911:31 O1,255(685) O O 11(10) (190) 190 235(100) (25) 45 15 (31 (225)550 40(20) N (80) 671 •, 616 (677) J I 115 280 . 105 155 (25) 55)N. .S 383 (200) NOT TO SCALE 206 778 -► t 439 891 (598 862 -► - -- 417 648) 180 530 ( 865 854 (20) 70)7 67 (214) (1120 ) ( 50(26) - (330) 705 ,303 1,102) - (470) 150 1 422(664) (125) 600 353 (1,318) , (65) 197 1 29(15) . 615(1,025) . CD1 1 (515 n II 468 911 i 607 604 z av)l (110) 20 15 (100) N NE N i t ) W W Wf W' t...i Q Q Q w. $ii 85 (15) z) :y r ii co 3 311 o1OTH ST if t 5 :: .. .::.**-' rg) lirT-2-- 0 I \ RENTON _ 11 E it 118 208 10 5) SW 7TH ST / o ;> ::. CITY 3? ,,r• -, >>: :?.>:'.::>. HALL .a I �3503 828 --► �-- 797�669) _is ,�, ;# :3' i f 7 8 '_ ",r, y # sa i W vjfn �:p { j GRAY Y1(_ 4,,, —"{s Y . L O920(120) O O (574)752� 6 (16) (410) 1,659 (316)696 ._.) (309)867 -► r-1,014 (903) (24)132 (35) 60 - �(33 (24) 797 (2,618) (95)55 I 30(15) LEGEND (XX) = AM PEAK HOUR 260(725) XX = PM PEAK HOUR < ' l < <'> <'>''' ` <. Figure g 8 2001 With-Project Peak Hour Traffic Volumes <«> igi i'::`i> Renton Home Depot (F) M:1991998521Cad\graphic1 Idk 11/02/9914:50 Traffic Impact Analysis for Renton Home Depot November 4, 1999 Table 4. Project Traffic Impacts at Study Intersections 2001 With-Project 2001 Without- AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Project TEV1 Project Project Project Project Intersection (AM) (PM) Traffic TEV %of TEV2 Traffic TEV %of TEV2 Rainier Ave S/S Grady Wy 5,470 5,775 65 5,535 1.2% 89 5,864 1.5% Talbot Rd S/S Grady Wy 4,050 3,830 97 4,147 2.3% 153 3,983 3.8% Williams Ave S/S Grady Wy 1,500 1,960 118 1,618 7.3% 216 2,176 9.9% City Hall Driveway/S Grady Wy 1,265 1,650 32 1,297 2.5% -12 1,638 -0.7% Wells Ave S/S Grady Wy 1,090 1,770 52 1,142 4.6% 73 1,843 4.0% Main Ave S-Benson Rd S/S Grady Wy 1,810 2,755 44 1,854 2.4% 60 2,815 2.1% 1. TEV represents the total entering vehicles at each study intersection during the peak hour 2. Represents the percentage of site-generated traffic entering the intersection in the AM and PM peak hours,respectively. During the AM and PM peak hours, the project would account for nearly 10 percent of the total entering traffic at the Williams Avenue S/S Grady Way intersection. Since this intersection would operate as the primary site access, impacts in this range are not unexpected. AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes at the remaining study intersections would increase by less than 5 percent of the total traffic. With the restriction of outbound left- turning traffic at the City Hall driveway on S Grady Way, a reduction in PM peak hour volumes is expected. Traffic Operations Impact The following three sections describe the project impacts related to intersection levels of service, phasing alternatives at the Williams Avenue S/S Grady Way site access, and overall impacts to the street system. Intersection Levels of Service Based on future with-project traffic volumes, AM and PM peak hour levels of service (LOS) were calculated at signalized and unsignalized study intersections. These calculations used the same intersection variables (number of lanes, traffic control, cycle lengths, etc.) as were used in evaluating future without-project conditions. In addition, levels of service were calculated at Williams Avenue S/S Grady Way for both signalized and unsignalized conditions. For comparison purposes, Tables 5 and 6 illustrate existing and future without- and with- project levels of service, average delays, and v/c ratios during the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Appendix A contains the detailed peak hour level of service worksheets for future with-project conditions. M:19919985211NP199852R1.DOC ©The Transpo Group,Inc.1999 Page 17 Traffic Impact Analysis for Renton Home Depot November 4, 1999 Table;5. Existing,2001 Without-and With-Project Level of Service-AM Peak Hour Existing Conditions 2001 Without-Project 2001 With-Project Location LOS1 Delay2 V/C3 LOS Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C Signalized Intersections4 Rainier Ave S/S Grady Wy E 41.1 0.96 E 49.2 1.00 E 51.4 1.00 Talbot Rd S/S Grady Wy C 22.2 0.66 C 24.2 0.71 C 24.2 0.73 Williams Ave S/S Grady Wy5 - - - - - - B 9.3 0.41 Main Ave S-Benson Rd S/S Grady Wy B 7.6 0.58 B 8.5 0.56 B 8.5 0.57 Unsignalized Intersections6 Williams Ave S/S Grady Wy D 22.2 - E 32.1 - F >45.0 - Renton City Hall Driveway/S Grady Wy C 16.4 - D 21.2 - B 5.5 - Wells Ave S/S Grady Wy A 5.0 - B 6.3 - B 6.7 - 1. LOS=Level of Service(A-F) 2. Delay=Average delay in seconds per vehicle 3. V/C=Critical volume-to-capacity ratio 4. LOS,delays,and v/c ratios at signalized intersections reflect the operation of the intersection as a whole. 5. Level of service reflects optimized operation,including north and southbound permitted left-turns. 6. LOS and delays at unsignalized intersections reflect the turning movement that experiences the most delay. Table 6. Existing,2001 Without-and With-Project Levels of Service-PM Peak Hour Existing Conditions 2001 Without-Project 2001 With-Project Location LOS1 Delay2 V/C3 LOS Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C Signalized Intersections4 Rainier Ave S/S Grady Wy E 42.3 0.96 E 53.4 1.03 E 58.7 1.05 Talbot Rd S/S Grady Wy D 27.1 0.80 D 29.4 0.85 D 30.0 0.86 Williams Ave S/S Grady Wy5 - - - - - - C 15.0 0.76 Main Ave S-Benson Rd S/S Grady Wy B 10.5 0.78 C 18.8 0.90 C 20.0 0.92 Unsignalized Intersections6 Williams Ave S/S Grady Wy E 36.2 - F >45.0 - F >45.0 - Renton City Hall Driveway/S Grady Wy F >45.0 - F >45.0 - B 7.8 - Wells Ave S/S Grady Wy B 8.0 - C 10.3 - C 11.5 - 1. LOS=Level of Service(A-F) 2. Delay=Average delay in seconds per vehicle 3. V/C=Critical volume-to-capacity ratio 4. LOS,delays,and v/c ratios at signalized intersections reflect the operation of the intersection as a whole. 5. Level of service reflects optimized operation,including north and southbound permitted left-turns. 6. LOS and delays at unsignalized intersections reflect the turning movement that experiences the most delay. As illustrated in Tables 5 and 6, the intersection of Williams Avenue S/S Grady Way would operate at LOS F as a stop sign controlled intersection due to the high traffic volumes on S Grady Way and the addition of project traffic. With the installation of a traffic signal, this intersection would operate in the LOS B-C range. For both peak hours, the calculated level of service for the signalized condition is based on a 120 second cycle length-the same cycle length for the adjacent signal at Talbot Road S/S Grady Way-and optimized with a protected westbound left-turning movement and permitted north and southbound left-turning movements. M:1991998521WP199852R1.DOC ©The Transpo Group,Inc.1999 Page 18 Traffic Impact Analysis for Renton Home Depot - November 4, 1999 A discussion of signal warrants is provided later in this report. With Williams Avenue S/S Grady Way as a signalized intersection, the operation of the City Hall driveway on S Grady Way would improve from LOS D to LOS B during the AM peak hour, and from LOS F to LOS B during the PM peak hour, due to the restriction of outbound left-turns from the driveway. The remaining study intersections, both signalized and unsignalized, would operate at the same level of service with or without the addition of project traffic. Williams Avenue S/S Grady Way Phasing Alternatives At the request of the City Transportation Department, more detailed operational analyses were conducted at the Williams Avenue S/S Grady Way signalized site access intersection under a variety of phasing alternatives, including permitted, protected, and split phasing. For each alternative, it was assumed that this intersection would operate with a 120-second cycle length, which is consistent with the cycle at the Talbot Road S/S Grady Way intersection, and provides maximum opportunity for coordinated operation along S Grady Way. In addition, it was assumed that for each alternative, the westbound left-turn movement on S Grady Way would operate with a protective left-turn phase. The levels of service, average delays, and v/c ratios for the various phasing alternatives are shown in Table 7 for both the AM and PM peak hours. The table also describes the north-south and east-west green times. Peak hour level of service worksheets for each of the alternative are included in Appendix B of this report. Table 7. Phasing Alternatives at the Williams Avenue S/S Grady Way Signalized Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour North-South Overall N-S/E-W Overall N-S/E-W Left-Turn Phasing Intersection Operation Green Time Intersection Operation Green Time Alternative LOS1 Delay2 V/C3 (seconds) LOS Delay V/C (seconds) Permitted Lefts B 9.3 0.41 36/84 C 15.0 0.76 63/57 Protected Lefts B 13.7 0.46 51 /69 D 33.0 0.92 71 /49 Split-Phasing B 13.4 0.46 58/62 D 33.0 0.92 72/48 1. LOS=Level of Service(A-F) 2. Delay=Average delay in seconds per vehicle 3. V/C=Critical yolume-to-capacity ratio Evaluation of the phasing alternatives indicate that regardless of the north-south left- turn phasing, the intersection of Williams Avenue S/S Grady Way would operate at LOS B during the AM peak hour. During the PM peak hour, this intersection would operate at LOS C with permitted left-turn phasing, and LOS D with protected or split phasing. In all phasing alternatives, the green splits were optimized to provide the best operation of the intersection as a whole. During the AM peak hour, this would result in more green time to the east-west travel along S Grady Way. Additional east-west green time could be allocated to S Grady Way, which would result in an overall intersection operation in the LOS B-C range. —. M:1991998521WP199852R1.DOC ©The Transpo Group,Inc. 1999 Page 19 Traffic Impact Analysis for Renton Home Depot November 4, 1999 During the PM peak hour, providing protected or split-phasing in the north-south direction would require more than 70 seconds of green time, or about 60 percent of the 120- second cycle. Even with this level of green time allocation, the north-south approaches would operate at LOS F in the PM peak hour. Providing permitted left-turn phasing in the north- south direction would allow an east-west green time of up to 70 seconds while still allowing LOS C overall operation at the intersection. At the same time, north-south traffic would operate at LOS D/E with maximum green times on S Grady Way and north-south permitted left-turn phasing. Overall System Operations A new traffic signal at the Williams Avenue S/S Grady Way intersection would operate at LOS C or better during peak hours, provide adequate access for Home Depot traffic, and provide alternative access the City Hall traffic. With a 120 second cycle, the signal could be timed, and/or interconnected with the Talbot Road S signal, to better work in the context of system progression along S Grady Way. Providing protected left-turn phasing on S Grady Way (for westbound left-turning traffic) and permitted left-turn phasing for the north-south approaches on Williams Avenue S and the Home Depot access would result in better overall intersection operation (LOS C) and maximum green time along S Grady Way, as compared to north-south protected or split-phasing. Site Access Analysis Three site access driveways are proposed: one right-in/right-out driveway on Talbot Road S, one right-in/right-out driveway on S Grady Way, and one signalized full-turning movement access driveway at the Williams Avenue/S Grady Way intersection. The driveway on Talbot Road S is proposed approximately 400 feet south of the S Grady Way intersection. The westerly driveway on S Grady Way is proposed approximately 240 feet east of the Talbot Road S intersection. The easterly driveway would form the southern leg and be aligned with the Williams Avenue S intersection on S Grady Way; a minor modification to the alignment of the southbound approach is also proposed in order to align the north-south through and left- turn movements. An evaluation of levels of service and queuing were conducted at the site access driveways for the future with-project peak hour traffic conditions. A signal warrant analysis was also conducted for the proposed site access at the Williams Avenue S/S Grady Way intersection. Auxiliary lane warrants, such as left-turn lanes and right-turn deceleration lanes, were also evaluated at site access driveways. Based on the results of the site access evaluations, Figure 9 was created to illustrate a preliminary channelization sketch of the section of S Grady Way between Williams Avenue S and Wells Avenue S. M:199199852IWP199852R1.DOC ©The Transpo Group,Inc. 1999 Page 20 + I I N } tw J z .....! 0 / /' /' ,///, //' /�/ ... a / 0 / / Z j /,//'//'// / w / sys ////:::// 11, 1' � / t 0 .L..' € o A Dc „ 7 4 9 „,,„ �� �pOQP ,,,.., ,,__ , , ///#1' ..-7 2 ' f ........L_Ir,j-- 2 -7---- \ ,..,, ,__= __ ,,, A./44_ * \ _ / / 2/ , .............................................. .............................................. .............................................. .............................................. >` ' <>> >> :ai. Figure 9 PreliminaryChannelizationon .,.,.,: ....:.::.....w €;...: S Grady Way • :':> : *x Renton Home Depot (A)M:1991998521Cadlgraphic3 Idk 11/04/9910:58 Traffic Impact Analysis for Renton Home Depot November 4, 1999 Driveway Levels of Service Level of service analyses were performed for the proposed right-in/right-out access intersections on S Grady Way and Talbot Road S for the weekday AM and PM peak hours. Table 8 shows the calculated levels of service at these site accesses. Note that the easterly driveway onto S Grady Way would be a new signalized intersection at Williams Avenue S. Table 8. 2001 With-Project Driveway Levels of Service Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Location LOS1 Delay2 LOS Delay Unsignalized Intersections3 Home Depot Driveway/S Grady Wy A 3.3 A 5.0 Talbot Rd S/Home Depot Driveway C 15.7 A 4.6 1. LOS=Level of Service(A-F) 2. Delay=Average delay in seconds per vehicle 3. LOS and delays at unsignalized intersections reflect the turning movement that experiences the most delay. The results of the site access level of service analyses show that both driveways would operate in the LOS A-C range during the AM peak hour and at LOS A during the PM peak hour with the Home Depot project. Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis As described earlier, the project is proposing access on S Grady Way that would align with the Williams Avenue S intersection to the north. The intersection of S Grady Way/Williams Avenue S is currently unsignalized with southbound traffic controlled with a stop sign. Based on future with-project level of service calculations (shown in Tables 5 and 6), it is projected that this intersection would operate at LOS F if it were to remain unsignalized. The Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) is used to evaluate warrants for the installation of traffic signals at stop sign controlled intersections. Eleven warrants are ,--- described with the instruction that "traffic control signals should not be installed unless one or more of the signal warrants are met" (Section 4C-2). An analysis of the Peak Hour Volume Warrant (Warrant 11) was conducted at the intersection of Williams Avenue S/S Grady Way. The signal warrant worksheet for this intersection is contained in Appendix C. Both the AM and PM peak hours were evaluated and it was determined that a traffic signal would be warranted at this location based on its PM peak hour traffic volumes. In general, when Warrant 11 is met, several other traffic signal warrants are met. Thus it is recommended that Home Depot install a full functioning traffic signal at its proposed access to the Williams Avenue S/S Grady Way intersection. M:1991998521WP199852R1.DOC ©The Transpo Group,Inc.1999 Page 22 Traffic Impact Analysis for Renton Home Depot November 4, 1999 Queuing A queuing analysis was conducted to evaluate queues at the proposed signalized access at Williams Avenue S and S Grady Way, and to determine if the peak hour queues would impact operation of nearby driveways and intersections. The City Hall driveway on S Grady Way would be located about 120 feet east of the new signalized intersection at Williams Avenue S. The queuing analysis was based on Equation 16.19 from the ITE Transportation and Traffic Engineering Handbook, 2nd Edition. The equation relates the average queue to the flow rate and the traffic signal's red time. The red time for this calculation was determined from optimized level of service calculations at the signalized intersection for with-project conditions. Forecast traffic queues were evaluated along S Grady Way for the westbound left-turn lane and through lanes at the Williams Avenue S signal, the westbound left-turn into the City Hall driveway, and the eastbound left-turn at the Wells Avenue S intersection. Both average queue lengths and maximum queue lengths were calculated. Average queue lengths reflect the average queue that would occur during the weekday AM or PM peak hour. Maximum queue lengths were determined to reflect the worst-case traffic queue occurring during the AM or PM peak hour. Maximum queues, defined as the 95th-percentile traffic queue for each tested movement, reflect a queue that would be exceeded less than 5 percent of the traffic signal cycles during the AM or PM peak hours. For this analysis, an average vehicle length of 25 feet was applied. Table 9 summarizes the traffic queues along the section of S Grady Way between Williams Avenue S and Wells Avenue S for weekday AM and PM peak hour conditions. Table 9. Queuing Analysis along S Grady Way Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour (Movement) Storage(ft) Avg.Q(ft) Max. Q(ft) Avg.Q(ft) Max.Q(ft) Williams Ave S/S Grady Wy1 Westbound Left-Turn 120 25 75 50 100 Westbound Through/Right-Turn - 125 225 125 225 Renton City Hall Dwy/S Grady Wy2 Westbound Left-Turn 100-150 25 50 25 50 Wells Ave S/S Grady Wy2 Eastbound Left-Turn 100-150 25 50 75 100 1. Queues at this signalized intersection are based on Equation 16.19 from the ITE Transportation and Traffic Engineering Handbook,Second Edition,and Poisson arrivals. 2. Queues at unsignalized intersections are calculated based on TRB Highway Capacity Manual,Chapter 10. Approximately 120 feet of distance would separate the left-turn movements between the signalized Williams Avenue S intersection and the City Hall driveway. The queuing analysis indicates that even the maximum (95th-percentile) queue would be accommodated within this distance during both the weekday AM and PM peak hours, and City Hall's access driveway would not be blocked. The results of the queuing analysis also suggest that the competing eastbound left-turns onto Wells Avenue S and the westbound left-turns into City Hall's access driveway would be accommodated within the existing 190-foot section of center two-way left-turn lane during both the AM and PM peak hours. M:199199852IWP199852R1.DOC ©The Transpo Group,Inc.1999 Page 23 Traffic Impact Analysis for Renton Home Depot November 4, 1999 Auxiliary Lane Warrant Analyses The need for left-turn storage lanes and right-turn deceleration lanes were evaluated with project traffic in 2001. The following sub-sections describe the results of the auxiliary lane warrant analyses. Left-Turn Lanes. These lanes are primarily installed to improve intersection operations by removing left-turning vehicles from the through traffic flow. Figure 910-6 in WSDOT's Design Manual, was used to determine if warrants for left-turn storage lanes would be met at the intersection of Williams Avenue S/S Grady Way. The remaining site accesses would operate as right-in/right-out driveways and therefore, left-turn lane warrants were not evaluated at these locations. Projected PM peak hour traffic volumes at Williams Avenue S/S Grady Way would warrant a westbound left-turn lane. As such, it is recommended that the existing center two- way left-turn lane on S Grady Way between Williams Avenue S and City Hall's driveway be channelized to provide an exclusive left-turn lane for westbound traffic turning into the site at the proposed Home Depot site access at Williams Avenue S. Appendix D includes a detailed summary of this warrant analysis. Right-Turn Deceleration Lanes. These lanes are primarily installed to improve operations at intersection approaches by removing right-turning vehicles from the through traffic flow. Figure 910-10, in WSDOT's Design Manual, was used to determine if warrants for right-turn deceleration lanes would be met at the site access driveways. Projected AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes at the right-in/right-out driveways along S Grady Way and Talbot Road S, and at the intersection of Williams Avenue S/S Grady Way, would not meet warrants for right-turn deceleration lanes and therefore, construction of these right-turn lanes is not recommended. Appendix D contains summaries of the right-turn lane warrant evaluations at site access driveways. Summary of Site Access Impacts Peak hour levels of service and auxiliary lane warrants were evaluated at the site access driveways on S Grady Way and Talbot Road S. In addition, queuing and traffic signal warrants were evaluated at the site's proposed signalized access at Williams Avenue S/S Grady Way. The following summarizes the results of these site access evaluations: • Adequate Levels of Service. Based on future with-project traffic volumes, all site access turning movements would operate in the LOS A-C range during the AM peak hour and at LOS A during the PM peak hour. • Signal Warranted. With the Home Depot access proposed on the south leg of the Williams Avenue S/S Grady Way intersection, installation of a traffic signal would be warranted, and is therefore recommended with development of the Home Depot. • Queuing Acceptable. Peak hour traffic queues at the proposed signalized intersection of Williams Avenue S and S Grady Way are not expected to block turn movements at the adjacent City Hall driveway or the Wells Avenue S intersection on S Grady Way. M:199199852IWP199852R1.DOC ©The Transpo Group,Inc.1999 Page 24 Traffic Impact Analysis for Renton Home Depot November 4, 1999 • WB Left-Turn Lane Warranted. Future PM peak hour traffic volumes at the Williams Avenue S/S Grady Way intersection would warrant a westbound left-turn lane. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing center two-way left-turn lane be channelized to provide an exclusive left-turn lane for westbound traffic turning into the site at the proposed Home Depot site access at Williams Avenue S. • Right-Turn Deceleration Lanes Not Warranted. Future AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes at the three site access driveways would not warrant right-turn deceleration lanes. Based on the results of these site access evaluations, Figure 9 provides a preliminary sketch of the recommended configurations, control, and channelization along the section of S Grady Way between Williams Avenue S and Wells Avenue S. On-Site Parking Analysis The current site plan proposes a total of 612 parking stalls. This supply was compared with the City of Renton's parking code requirements. City Code identifies the following minimum parking requirements: • Home Depot Store: Minimum of 4 stalls per 1,000 gsf(5 per 1,000 maximum) • Garden Center: 1 stall per 2,000 gsf ,• ADA Handicap Parking: Minimum of 2 percent of total on-site stalls With the proposed 117,000 gsf Home Depot store and 15,000 gsf Garden Center, City Code would require a minimum of 498 stalls. Therefore, the proposed parking supply of 612 stalls, resulting in about 4.6 stalls per 1,000 gsf, would meet the City's minimum parking requirement but would not exceed the City's maximum of 615 stalls. A minimum of 12 stalls would be reserved for ADA Handicap parking, according to City Code requirements. Frontage Improvements City Code requires that full urban frontage improvements be maintained or constructed along each roadway adjacent to the property. Full frontage improvements already exist along both S Grady Way and Talbot Road S. A portion of the back (southeast) side of the property fronts Benson Road S. Benson Road S is a paved two-lane arterial, with areas of paved and gravel shoulders, and no curb, gutter, or sidewalks adjacent to the project site. No vehicular or pedestrian access is proposed to/from the site from Benson Road S, due to inaccessibility across the steep vegetated slope, wetland area, and ditch/stream system. A request,for waiver of the full urban frontage improvement requirement along Benson Road S will be made to the Board of Public Works, pending review of the subject Home Depot application by City transportation staff. M:1991998521WP199852R1.DOC ©The Transpo Group,Inc.1999 Page 25 I I Traffic Impact Analysis for Renton Home Depot November 4, 1999 The project would install a new traffic signal at the Williams Avenue/S Grady Way intersection to provide full-turning movement access to/from the site. The traffic signal would be designed to meet the City of Renton and WSDOT requirements for a signalized intersection. By signalizing this location, outbound left-turns would be restricted from the adjacent City Hall driveway, which is located approximately 120 feet east of this intersection. However, a connection would be provided between City Hall and the Home Depot site, allowing City Hall traffic to access westbound S Grady Way via the new signal. Home Depot traffic would account for about 83 percent of the AM peak hour traffic that would use the new southerly leg of the Williams Avenue S/S Grady Way intersection, and 61 percent of the PM peak hour traffic. Outbound City Hall traffic, which would need to use the new signal to access westbound S Grady Way, would account for about 17 percent of the AM peak hour traffic, and 39 percent of the PM peak hour traffic that would use the intersection's new southerly leg. Transit Impacts Transit impacts are described in terms of service, usage, and transit stops. Service. Transit service in the study area will continue to be provided by King County's METRO Transit. King County's Six-Year Transit Plan may result in additional service in the study area by 2001; however, specific service changes are not known. Usage. To provide a conservative (worst-case) analysis of traffic impacts, the trip generation estimates assumed no usage of project-generated trips by transit. Any increase in transit use and reduction in single-occupancy-vehicle (SOV) trips is considered desirable, and would reduce the identified traffic impact proportionally. Transit usage will also increase with additional transit service in the future. Transit Stops. The location of the existing transit stop on S Grady Way,just east of the Talbot Road S intersection, is anticipated to remain. The project would provide a pedestrian connection to the existing stop that would tie into the proposed pedestrian connections within the site. M:1991998521WP199852R1.DOC ©The Transpo Group,Inc. 1999 Page 26 Traffic Impact Analysis for Renton Home Depot November 4, 1999 MITIGATION MEASURES The following three measures are identified to mitigate transportation impacts of the proposed 132,000 gsf Home Depot store, located at the southeast corner of the Talbot Road S/S Grady Way intersection in the City of Renton. Traffic Impact Fee. The City of Renton has an adopted Impact Fee Program. As mitigation for a project's impact to the area transportation system, the City of Renton requires an impact fee to help fund future capacity improvements within the City. The impact fee is $75 per net new average weekday daily trip (AWDT). The 132,000 gsf Home Depot store is anticipated to generate 3,530 "new" average weekday daily trips (1,180 would be "pass-by" trips). The existing 81,241 gsf of general light-industrial use on-site has the opportunity to generate about 570 weekday daily trips, which are credited toward the total Home Depot trip generation. The Home Depot traffic generation less the existing on-site use results in a net addition of 2,960 weekday daily new trips. This net new average weekday daily trip generation would result in a traffic impact fee of$222,000. Signalization of the Williams Avenue S/S Grady Way Intersection. With the Home Depot driveway access proposed on the south leg of the Williams Avenue S/S Grady Way intersection, installation of a traffic signal would be warranted, and is therefore recommended. By signalizing this location, outbound left-turns would be restricted from the adjacent City Hall driveway. However, a connection would be provided between City Hall and the Home Depot site, allowing City Hall traffic to access westbound S Grady Way via the new signal. Home Depot traffic would account for about 83 percent of the AM peak hour traffic that would use the new southerly leg of the intersection, and 61 percent of the PM peak hour traffic. Outbound City Hall traffic, which would need to use the new signal to access westbound S Grady Way, would account for about 17 percent of the AM peak hour traffic, and 39 percent of the PM peak hour traffic that would use the intersection's new southerly leg. S Grady Way Channelization. A westbound left-turn lane would be warranted at the signalised Williams Avenue S/S Grady Way intersection. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing center two-way left-turn lane be channelized to provide an exclusive left-turn lane for westbound traffic turning into the site at the proposed Home Depot site access at Williams Avenue S. With implementation of these three identified mitigation measures, no adverse or unmitigateable impacts to study intersections, site access driveways, or area street system are expected as a result of the proposed Renton Home Depot store. -li M:1991998521WP199852R1.DOC ©The Transpo Group,Inc. 1999 Page 27 Appendices Provided Under Separate Cover