The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA78-143 itr..27- 7-7(7 I .-- n-.i t.4•CITY OF:RENTON; =^'4 4`'WASH,IN.GTiON,-,"' ORDINANCE NO.3308 • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZON- ING CLASSIFICATION Affidavit of Publication OF CERTAIN PROPER- 'TIES WITHIN THE CITY OF. RENTON FROM. GENERAL CLASSIFI- STATE OF j WASHINGTON ss CATION DISTRICT G COUNTYT OF KING TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT(L-1) (R-143- 78) WHEREAS under Chap- 'P being first duly sworn on ter 7,Title IV(Building Regu- Theodora.1•••Tht132®•y g Y lations) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the"Code of General Ordinances of the oath,deposes and says that S.h.e..is the Cjz i.•e•f•••C•3:er•k of City of Renton",as amend= THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four(4) ed, and the maps and re times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and ports adopted in conjunction has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred • i therewith, the property to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news hereinbelow described has paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, heretofore been zoned'as and it is now aud;during all of said time was printed in an office maintained General Classification Dis- at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Renton triot G ;atxl on Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper order of the ( ) ' -• cr , PP gby �,- y;,T, Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, WHEREAS:a;properf.pelt-� 'ion for ,change• "of?zone j Washington.That the annexed is a O.RD......33.0.8 classification of said proper is ty has been filed with the Planning Department on or • about March 14, 1978, I which petition'was duly re- 1 ferred to the Hearing Ex- as it was published in regular issues(and aminer for investigation, not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period i study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on 'or • about April 11, 1978, and • of 1 consecutive issues,commencing on the said matter having been duly. considered.by the Hearing 2.0...day of April. ,19...7.9...,and ending the Examiner and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehen- sive Plan,as amended,and day of ,19 ,both dates the City Council having duly inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- considered all matters relev- scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee �� ant thereto, and all parties having been heard appear- I ing in support thereof or'in charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $..5.9.:2,2which opposition thereto, NOW has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the THEREFORE • first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent THE CITY COUNCIL OF• insertion. THE CITY •OF RENTON„) WASHINGTON, DO OR=( IC")<Se......ez_rez_e__L_.4...c4L.c . i •DAIN AS FOLLOWS: I SECTION I:The following • , - described property in 'the City of Renton is hereby CYi of• 'Clerk I rezoned to Light Industrial 1 District(L-1)as hereinbelow Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2.O day of specified;subject to the find- ings, conclusions and deci- IC sion dated April 14, 1978; April , 19...7.9 & N. the Pllanni on Director and di- rested to change the maps,' . of•the Zoning Ordinance,asp Notary Pu i in and for the State of Washin on, I amended, to evidence said • ' residing at Kent,King C nty. rezoning,to-wit: >, •``o",";'s I, Lots 21 through 28 inclu- ',�` ^ ;a • �f �`� : sive in Block 28 of C.D. ;zg - i.,A ] j8lature,1955,known as Senate Bill281,effective June Hillman's Earlingto n rw a f .,, ! Garden Addition to the I City of Seattle, Division i . ;,�..>, .n• i'ti eiegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, No.1,as per plat record- ',proigh rt ws a ers of the State. ed in Volume 17 of Plats, `'• P P Page 74, Records of • King County (Said pro- perty perty, being located at,,— - vicinity,of-.62t)"SAW9W • Street)" .:','+ '•. t_eiariLetLin-ithr el'a r.: V.P.C.Form No.87 _.-• �. ' `/3F2E OF RA, A 0 THE CITY OF RENTON ,$ ® Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD 090 Q3' CITY CLERK 0,9gTeD SErYvet.° • April 19 , 1979 James W. Dalpay P. O. Box 2436 Renton , Wa. 98055 Re: Rezone R-143-78 rJ Dear Mr. Dalpay, The. Renton City Council, during its regular meeting on Monday, April 16, 1979 has adopted ordinance No, 3308. A copy is enclosed for your information. • Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON Delores A. Mead, 'C.M. C. City Clerk DAM:j'eb'c1b Enclosure 1 CITY OF,RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 3308 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES•WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM GENERAL CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT (G) TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (L-1) (R-143-78) WHEREAS under Chapter 7, Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the "Code of 'General Ordinances of the City of Renton", as amended, and the maps and reports •adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as General Classification District (G); and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Planning Department on or about March,T4, 1978, which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about April 11, 1978, and said • matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and.all parties having been heard appearing in support'thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Light Industrial District (L-1) as hereinbelow specified; subject to the findings, conclusions and decision dated April 14, 1978; the Planning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. (Said property being located at vicinity of 620 S.W. 12th Street) AND SUBJECT FURTHER to that certain Declaration of Restrictive Covenants executed by Petitioner-owners on or about April 16, 1979 and recorded in the office of the Director of Records and Elections, Receiving. No. 7904160606 and which said Covenants hereby incorporated and made a part hereof as if fully set forth. SECTION II: This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 16th day of April, 1979. �� Delores ':A.':Mead', y er APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 16th of April, 1979. Charles J.3elaurenti, Mayor. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: April 20, 1979 (2) 0 3308 EXHIBIT "A" ORDINANCE NO. 3308 LOTS 21 THROUGH 28 INCLUSIVE IN BLOCK 28 OF C. D. HILLMAN' S EARLINGTON GARDEN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SEATTLE, DIVISION N0. 1, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN' VOLUME 17 OF PLATS, PAGE 74, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY. EXHIBIT "B" i ORDINANCE NO. 3308 ' V►QW N6t1'ba 11417ViR Rla►L. Qtt- IV 41. 10 I. V. , e i 4 d O Q is ♦s•sit% V L7 0040 5t1/41. 405 Antoton ceana r u' �uta,5e.cs s► ® Ja+ w. pALtpr RE7.omE, #1Z-to-7d C-rl.ocan 'Po L- • OF RA 41, Ay THE CITY OF RENTON 0 z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 o ° CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9 •0 L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593 0,917- SEP�EOO April 23, 1979 • Mr.' James W. Dalpay P.O. Box .2436 Renton, WA 98055 RE: File No. R-143-78; James W. Dalpay Request for Rezone. Dear Mr. Dalpay: This is to notify you that the above referenced request was approved at the meeting of the Renton City .Council of April 16, 1979 by • adoption of Ordinance No. 3308. . Sincerely, • • • •:•': % LC.1/G�,LC C 2Gx r�L2JU /��0 L. Rich Beeler `��?}l rrr i �Q Hearing Examiner / . 1c5 • cc: Planning Department GrjJ w /ity Clerk t\ ts' <��Q�\ U? V (Z7d.F �le No. R-143-78 'fames w. ay DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, James W. Dalpay and his wife Diane G. Dalpay are the owners of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: Lots 21 through 28 inclusive in Block 28 of C.D. Hillman's Earlington Garden Addition to the City of Seattle, Division No. 1, as per plat o recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 74, records of King County. .13 N WHEREAS, the owners of said described property, hereinafter "the property," d desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as N to use, present and future, of the property; NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with' respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs and assigns, as follows: SETBACKS A minimum 20-foot setback shall be retained along S.W. 12th Street; a minimum 107foot setback shall be retained along the east property line; and a minimum 10-foot setback shall be retained along the north property line. • LANDSCAPING A minimum 20-foot landscape strip shall be provided adjacent to S.W. 12th Street; a minimum 10-foot landscape strip shall be provided adjacent to the east property line; and a minimum 10-foot landscape strip shall be provided adjacent to the north property line. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted to, and approved • by the Renton Planning Department as part of the building permit application. OUTSIDE STORAGE AREAS outside storage of materials, equipment, and containers may be permitted within the'-buildable portion of the property when said.storage is properly screened by a sight-obscuring fence not less than six feet in height nor more than 10 feet in height, together with a minimum five-foot landscape strip subject to review and approval of the Renton Planning Department. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31,' 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation. Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by O �O said breach. Reasonable attorneys' fees incurred during an enforcement proceeding will be borne by the parties whom the court determines are in error and shall be Q Or" entered as a judgment in such action. J' es . Delpay j))CCCJJ /mac- GL` Lane G. Dalpay STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING ) • p 19-( , before me personally day of On this F�pt1 Q appeared -A%\No`, LU, 1/4\A' )A `a/ the persons who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said persons for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. '\:4VA �1Y1 . \A �Q e Notary Public in and for the state of Washington, residing in k.P1;,cr,0 • • C ,�'1 • i. .'.... .w° • -2- -.,,-. ,:,;;,,c,rZ": -.;:::',..,'-' ..„1 ,,,...::::;;.',.... .1t7-%.::..'f:::::::;. i' 'Renton fCi ty Councia i ,:, ..::.,,. ,.- .- - i.:,::'...: _,::,::;-„:.i.-:4;:.r.,-.:,-: _ ..,,,,.,,...,.. .,.. ,..,....,,,,,,,:,,,, 4/16/79 Page, ,4: Old Business - ConiHued ..,- Commit tee• of.-Whol e..�'Councia:�'Pres,' ` en �.�' '," '�� " `''n ,ed::; om '. . . �,d :,t .Shlnpoch'.,prese t _C mittee'of,. the Whole. Re ort:, reor't'ad`':i ,;�.,:.; iCrr'-i r;f o p . emo _ 4 i.'n • v, ng,,.m: ,.,f,rbm. Mayor;�,.;De;.1'aur;enti"'.repor.ted``de,l ay. _„.,,. „:„......:,, .,.,.:::),.:,..._,1:;:ii.„:::,..,: , .: ,,, asking ,consider`ation'of the Building reorganization plan .until Building ,budget presentation, `and that` Councilman Stredicke had requested .... :' • •Reorgani'zation:; in:formati:'o'n ;i':n:-,advanc;e ,-of:�:the,'bud• .et.''he'arin gs:.' Informa:tion , Fire Department The .Comma'ttee. _'the- Whole��r.:epo.rrecommen'ded'that the -subject of-Consolidation &' cons;o:'lidat . .._::.' : ion_,of;: Fire': - � _ • ' "' " 'Repartment`s��and fire::pro.tection-.south� of- , .: h e::,C,i ty-: be:`r'e f e r red::t•o ., '_, , • Y Protection for the ::Publio'SA fire ,.Committee for recommenda South-,City tion `to;' Council . MOVED BY'..PERRY, SECOND' CL.YMER, REFER MATTER - TO TH.E BUDGET 'COMMITTEE CARRIED S heres".:of Th.e:`.re ort''reco�mended;.that 'the` V ub ect:.of-S !heres of Influence P P m. s ., 'J ... .p °' Influence'': Y,. ''be;:referr-ed:ctothe:°Ways'yand `Means`JCommitt'ee:.,f.or,': the appropriate - - : - :_:res.ol ution;-with;the s'tipulatio;n;•that',,•-•o.,northern: boundary be . . .1.)%o aed. _to Jh-. i'40'' to th 2 9-77ton :S,choo;T':D:i str.i ca ' The report „` '. 'started the committee :was assured that agreemen"t; at this ,time..did 4 . note-,tectitute a. fi:nianci,a:l.,commi tmen,t, no'r'-were'there areas, which °`: :: were• not negotiable a't a laterr°date.`. MOVED`'BY .SH•INPOCH; SECOND. ';; :CLYMER, CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION CARRIED: ., ; i - Trash'Rece tac'l.es. The' re`-,,t0N_tated i th�a't'Ma O..., De a"re n:ti'' �l, ,'-n d .'a need f 'r P p. l u :exp a.i e e ,o `65. new• :tras'h., r'ece`p,tacles with` a'`_•purchas'e". rice::of '`$5;'1'62.23 an the; :: < commi ' i, 'recommend'ed' that°••th"e 'matter"; be`referred to the Community � Servi=ces':Committee. :MOV'E , BY ;CC.Y;MER 4.SECOND TRIMM, CONCUR ,IN r THE::::REPOR.T. CARRIED': 11 a. ' �1. t} F4� '1..5'. ORDhNANCES 'AND'RESOLUT IONS .�. .,,: :''.', Wa ,: s:�:a'ndl-M an e s: : W'a 's:c_an' .M. e_a',ns�:c:Commiatee �'Cha'i:r�ian: Cl�. :mer.. resented. report �recom . ;'• :"Commit.tee�',:Repo'r't , mendingsyecond::: ands :fina:l::':'re.adi;ngs;;of,.r-the 'fol:lowi'ng -ordinances' :,;.,.; :'�' •?,,,-'' Ordinance, #3308�: .. .;(Fi_r,:st readi ngs ��4/9,/,79a ,-:..; Dal' ay 'Ree : An ordinance:;was read changing zoning cl.assifi-cation from G General torLi:.ght Industrial Distract L `:1 for property 'locat'ed in vicinity 620 SW..12.th=St,` :`known as:,.the Dal:pa Rezone`."t MOVED BY TRIMM ' ,,., ' .. ... : ,,: CQNQ':C�LY ER'>> 'DQRT;., ME?.;ORDhNANGAS,:.;READ, :':,:ROLL .CAL:L: ALL.:AYES• ''' e RRI' "D;..r E f.: 1 - d -Ord 'na�nc 3 ,w,, e,` 3 09 'A n•�ordf��na ce;'7 n �-,w�'s. .re a a°d�',.rezon. of roDAert' -from::G-.1 General to Sin l• e ' ra: .r`;B ee Re��one f a ;,�, pj;i:a; :R is es d nce"s' s�, 'c - - e .,Dt tra t:::SR.`.1� `located": nahe �:v'icinit of •]800 R:306=7. 9 �� ;:D'v'a 'u 1:1 .=NE"'= 'n � n'. , k ow. asa''F.ran6ri,'Ai pro. ,e,t MOVEDC9": °PERRY co • :.. . ., :,',, : 7". ..i ER' ADORT TW-,-MRDhNANCE AS'::-. D: ':S;:R,. A QLL��CALL::: 'A1f.�Ayes Exeept�.:' •` : STREDICKE.,�VOTED NQ � MOTION .CARRIE-D��. , Ordi.na,nce``#33.10 An: ordi nancYe was read transferring $10,Q00 for.compromise l i tiga Settlement .,, , ti o,n re ard,i n ma, es,,-and..extra-.contrac;i;°.'.com':ensati on claims i n ' Ha ,es::Mechan:i cal :fav'oro Ha yes";Mec an'c = 'x :,.' y �� h:. �.,. arl`� ` I,nc�,,.MQ'VEQ: B ,TRIMM.� SECOND' Ch'YMER,�" - ADOPT :AS 'READ a. ROLL{CALL ALL: AY;ES;-EXCEPT'-STREDI,CKE. CARRIED:,''. 1 ., : , ..1, t d' }. s Rea a n 'n= rd . c ;:o a n '=wa�A a re-io,. ,, ;.. .r n er ro :;G��''to �B=1. Bus i�ne 'I. , . ;,...;::�: 'Althoff,.Rezone...;. ; ,>�,<..:..:=...., : rand. R -3,'-1oca�ted :o:n��the�.aouthwe5`t' coiner.,:;of:: Sunset Blvd: NE��and;`:�'`:'.'�' R 272 78 Anacortes- Ave;:�-,NE,`kno,!,lias..:Aitho`ffv,; rop ert MOVED BY CLYMER :, -SEC D P ,T: ;;::: ,'.� ON RO.C, OR :. ,CONCIIR-�-.I �ECOM NDRT�' ::THE° a - - „�, N:;�:R ME ,IQN '.OE. E' COMMITTEE ;AND . REFER.:Bi4C'!C•.;TQ�TN`; -' E JAYLS AND. EANS: :GOMMIf`TE--,-FOR or - WEEK. CARR'I'ED".'� �",�t' Resolution.� #2267. Ways `;and,f Means`:Comml ttee recommended reads:ng"':and''adoption of - Al 1 e Vacati"on- fo11. �`i` r ow n` eso:l:ut ;ons`: ` - Y 9- -Bet we n:�SW 1'2th r e o u o '�-w s�r� .ead�''s tt; � `d� �r n� a,te= of:�'6�.1��1I"7.9`=f-or ublic .hearn and:•clip-13th;. Ito-�c '`�i" 'der : a=fi`:o .o E'ia °e='rt�t-• �falley � • VAC: 1 h1- J1 ,�. _ -c ted� et%reen;:Sw ;h2th andSW:;�;�1�3th�S:treets:;: MOVED,:BYCLYMER ;::�:: : ::SEC D;; r ON BY°�:ASH°I'.NPOCH'' .A'bOP:T-'riTHE��.:RES LUT�I`.�N�:SAS,REA CARRI' 'D' ' 1.• t r t. Resoluti on so vt''`on•� f �. was re` �'s a r-''t ,ari �6:-°3' �2�::;from`';Co in' e "c F h.. g'�:'$ , .$ nt n. u`nd`�'�°�i'r:t� :`;��': Fund:Transfer to' .0 rre ; ;, �..:='ry,'; u,, ntFund for payment;'9 r1:9,79< soc.iation ..of-'Washington .AWC Dues, ::I ,. Cities, service fee ($ ,2178 per 1978 population 'of 29,000) . MOVED -BY',:CLYMER, 'SECOND SH:INPOCW,, CONCURif'I'N. ,RECOMMENDATION AND' ; •'° 1,`': ADOPT:��;THE':RESOLUTION AS>'READ "r ,See Ja`ter,:,a:ct�on. : ti:;; P1 OVE b-BY�� ,ERRS EGONDTSHAPJ, �4,UNC:I:L:�:�RE`CESS` .CARRLED:: °C; .reces `ell• _3 n recon'`en` t-':` 5` :m�:. ROL'•L= ' A1- i;y e;,r n �Me b' ;, ! mer� _ ,..--.,...:.,,,: _...,-,..4.,. se ::o; ow;i�n. i'scuss' n.�o °r'±"�<<�;rr _n:. g;;_�d; n:::res:ou`.tioh:,;a,,. ,r. .:. ..- :'. .•1�. `4 1 /13„ ,,) ,e_ Renton City Counci 1 4/9/79 Page ,5 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS - Continued Ordinance #3307 Councilman Perry declared possible conflict of interest and left the Deak Rezone 1 Chambers taking no part in any discussion or action of this matter. R-286-79 An ordinance was read rezoning property from R-2 to P-1 located at the west side of Talbot Rd. south of SE 43rd St. , known as the Deak Rezone. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND PERRY, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE 1 AS READ. Councilman Stredicke explained withdrawal of his objection. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Councilman Perry returned to Chambers. First Reading he Ways and Means Committee report recommended first reading for Dalpay Rezone the following ordinances: R-143-78 ! An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification from G to L-1 property located 620 SW 12th St. , known as the Dalpay Rezone. 1 MOV.ED BY CLYMER, SECOND PERRY, REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. First Reading 1 An ordinance was read changing zoning classification from G-1 to Brier Rezone SR-1 located in the vicinity of 1800 Duvall Ave. NE, known as the Fran Briere Rezone. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, REFER BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. I First Reading , An ordinance was read appropriating funds in amount of $10,000 Settlement as compromise settlement in favor of Hayes Mechanical , Inc. MOVED Hayes Mechanical BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Resolution #2265 The Ways and Means Committee recommended reading and adoption of Compensatory Time the following resolutions: A resolution was read establishing policy regarding accumulation and I allowance of compensatory time by City employees in lieu of overtime. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND PERRY, ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #2266 A resolution was read setting hearing date of 6/4/79 for vacation of Vacation Portion proposed right-of-way lying outside the new alignment of Sunset R/W adjacent to Blvd. NE adjacent to Jack-in-the-Box per petition filed by Alex NE Sunset Blvd. Backamus. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE, ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Voucher Approval The Ways and Means Committee recommended approval of Vouchers No. 22657 through No. 22848 in amount of $544,900.19 plus LID 297 Warrants R-14 in amount of $42,349.43 and C-17 $42,349.43; plus LID 302 Warrants: R-33 $98,618.75, C-76 $93,687.81 and C-77 1 $4,930.94. Vouchers received departmental certification as to receipt of merchandise and/or services received or rendered. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are adopted by one motion without separate discussion unless requested. Adopting motion follows items: Small Cities The American Association of Small Cities extended invitation to Seminar , elected officials and community leaders to participate with others in a seminar 4/21/79 at the Longacres Racetrack Paddock Club in Renton. Invitation from Fife Mayor Vraves, Renton Mayor Delaurenti and Region Manager Oldenburg. Refer to Council President. Vacation of Letter from City Clerk Mead presented petition for vacation of a Portion of Alley portion of alley between SW 12th St. and SW 13th St. , noting receipt SW 12th & SW 13th of filing fee. Refer to the Public Works Department, Board of Public Works, Transportation Committee and Ways and Means Committee for verification of petition, determination re advisability, easement and vacation fee; also resolution setting public hearing date of 6/11/79. Concur. Park Equipment ' Bid Opening 4/5 Redwood play equipment for Gene Coulon Memorial Bid Acceptance ' Beach Park and Tiffany Park; 3 bids received. See attached tabula- tion. Letter from Director of Parks and Recreation Webley reported the Park Board recommendation for acceptance of low bid of Funco Playground Equipment. Council concur. Consent Agenda ' MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA. Adopted CARRIED. 1 Renton City Council 4/9/79 Page 6 CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS Easement for; Letter from Public Works Director Gonnason requested a resolution Park and Ride Lot be prepared authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a quit claim deed to the State of Washington regarding sewer easement for the Park and Ride Lot. Future use of the easement not anticipated. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDA- TION. City Attorney Warren noted a resolution not needed. CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY-SHANE, SECOND' SHINPOCH, COUNCIL MEETING ADJOURN. CARRIED. 12:42 a.m. Delores A. Mead, CMty Clerk I File No. k-143-78 W. Dalpay DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, James W. Dalpay and his wife Diane G. Dalpay are the owners of the. following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: . Lots 21 through 28 inclusive in Block 28 of C.D. Hillman's Earlington • Garden Addition to the City of Seattle, Division No. 1, as per plat recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, .page 74, records of King County. . WHEREAS, the owners of said-•described property,.hereinafter "the property," desiie to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the.land as to use, present and future, of the property; NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with-the land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs, and assigns, as follows: . • • SETBACKS A minimum 20-foot setback shall be retained along S.W. 12th Street; a minimum 10-foot setback shall be retained along the east property line; and a minimum 10-foot setback shall be retained along the north property line. LANDSCAPING A minimum 20-foot landscape strip shall be,provided adjacent to S.W. 12th Street; a minimum 10-foot landscape strip shall be provided adjacent to the east property line; and a minimum'10-foot landscape strip shall be provided.adjacent to the • • north property line. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Renton Planning Department as part of the building permit application. OUTSIDE STORAGE AREAS - Outside storage of materials, equipment, and containers may be permitted within the buildable portion of the property when said storage is properly screened by a sight-obscuring fence not less than six feet in height nor more than 10 feet in height, together with a minimum five-foot landscape strip subject to review and approval of the Renton Planning Department. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the • ' Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further r ' 4 documentation. Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by said breach. Reasonable attorneys' fees incurred during an enforcement proceeding will be borne by the parties whom the court determines are in error and shall be entered as a judgment in such action. ! JatAes . Dal pay Diane G. Dalpay ></!1( /6212i'f:37 STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING {L On this 1. 4 day of .1 , 19'I'{ , before me personally ' appeared k. ..141 Lk' the persons who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said 'persons for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. \()'( `.hil • ' '-')- Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing in 1•:, . I • _Z_ • • OF RED • � a . ;y 0 0 THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o . ° CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9A `O _ L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593 0 -Tf EN`��Q, D SEPT January 19, 1979 �f`, • Mr. James W. Dalpay ``� '; • s,) 4 • P.O. BOX 2436 a Fy^a,, �i c• ' ..s ' Renton, WA 98055 • 4 a?. . • sl11uc,�a�;S RE: File No. R-143-78; James W. Dalpay1V"icinity of 620 S.W. .12th Street) . . Dear Mr. Dalpay': , Pursuant to appeal of the Hearing Examiner's recommendation and subsequent . approval of the request by the Renton City 'council on ,June 19, 1978, restrictive covenants were drafted to stipulate certain conditions imposed upon the property by the Hearing Examiner. In order to finalize the subject rezone by adoption of an ordinance, by the City Council, these restrictive covenants must be signed and' filed with King County. We request that you' contact the office of the Hearing Examiner as soon as possible so that the application may be completed. Sincerely, G/( w tc.(t, w .n64 � e yt/ Marilyn letersen Hearing Administrative Assistant cc: Planning 'Department /City Clerk RENTON CITY COUNCIL June 19 , 1978 City Clerk ' s Office REFERRALS" BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS Petition for vacation of alley between Burnett & Williams Avenues So. for report regarding retention of utility easements, public hearing 7/24/78. CITY ATTORNEY AND *INSURANCE CARRIER *Claim for damages, Olympic Pipe Line Co. Resolution setting date of public hearing 7/24/78 for vacation of alley McLendon Hardware Consult with Public Works Director re Talbot Road drainage problem and possible law suit PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Proposed L-2 zone for manufacturing plan for small land areas �I PLANNING STAFF'I - Dean Bitney request for comprehensive plan change- report to Planning & Development Committee PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE Report in regards to King County EMS contract providing CPR training to school students PUBLIC WORKS DIIRECTOR —Prepare estimate of cost for proper drainage on Talbot Road-consult with. attorney, and report back Recommendation 'as to appraisal and validation of petition regarding vacation of alley McLendon Hardware, report for 7/24/78 public hearing. TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE Re retention of easements of vacation of alley McLendon Hardware UTILITIES COMMITTEE Drainage problem Talbot Road So. ,WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE . ix year street '.and arterial construction program as amended -zEIAlpay rezone, R-143-78, appeal denied, refer for ordinance Proposed rezone,, Fay C. Hill , for ordinance I • I • ej• :,.i- RENTON CITY COUNCIL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMIT'1'EE . COMMITTEE REPORT June 15 , 1978 TO: Council Members FROM: Planning and Development Committee RE: APPEAL'OF HEARING EXAMINER DECISI.ON, 1-L S—DTAy REZONE, FILE NO. R-143-78 The Planning and Development Committee, after examination of the record, the Hearing Examiner' s written decision, . . findings , and conclusions, and the written appeal, has determined that no error in fact or law exists pursuant to Section 4-3016 a Therefore, it is the Committee' s recommendation that the City Council concur in the recom- mendation of the Hearing Examiner on the above-mentioned item and refer it to the Ways and Means Committee for . proper ordinance preparation. • George Perry, Chairman Barbara Shinpoch, Member - Patricia Seymour-Thorpe, Member Renton City Council 6/19/78 Page 3 Public Hearings - Cont. PUBLIC HEARING ' This being the date set and proper notices having been posted, Proposed Closure ' published and mailed, Mayor Pro tem Clymer opened the public of N. Riverside hearing to consider closure of North Riverside Drive adjacent Drive to the new Cedar River Trail . Persons present and making comments regarding proposed closure of Riverside Dr. N. included: For closure - Dan Warren 830 Riverside Dr. N. , Int' 1 . Operating Engi- neers, to protect against damage to premises as has been previously hit by cars . Gary Dime, 927 No. 1st St. feels closure would provide higher and better use; better insurance rates and safety, that people would not be walking in street with the traffic, would appreciate property value with direct river access. Larry Good, 908 Riverside N. , feels street is now a safety hazard as it is a through street to Bronson, which handles heavy traffic. Opposing closure of Riverside Dr. N. - Frank Beanblossom, 810 Riverside Dr. N. Robert E. McBeth,Attorney, 1906 Rolling Hills Ave. SE, on behalf of Pauline Kirkman, 1002 N. 35th, Renton, property owner one house from proposed blockade objects because of access restriction, Riverside N. to 1st, no access for garbage disposal , no police patrol , and no turn around for fire department use, depreciation of property value, as they see it there is no beneficial purpose of a planter area. Also, as they have the last driveway on Riverside Dr. N. and foresee it being used as a turn around, with no other turn around being on the proposed layout; Wyman Dobson, 821 No. 1st St. representing client Lewis Peretti , questioned location of blockade. Riverside Dr. N. has provided business access, blockade would depreciate value of property. Problem noted if fire department were to go though barrier. During ensuing discussion it was suggested that the city wait to that point of construction of the trail system to determine if closure is necessary, because more problems would be created than solved. MOVED BY THORPE, SECOND TRIMM TO CLOSE HEARING. CARRIED. Thorpe commented that proposed blockade should be moved as to allow fire department access to apartments, but continue the closure of Riverside N. *MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND SHINPOCH,THE STREET BE KEPT AS IT IS NOW. In ensuing discussion, Councilwoman Thorpe noted her committee, in public meeting, heard from all affected parties and had considered those aspects now questioned regarding giving up river front property to property owners and whether the trail was to be people or vehicle oriented, access for refuse, etc. to be from rear of apartments. Stredicke proposed posting No Parking and making Riverside a one way system eliminating much of the traffic. *THE MOTION CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Planning and Planning and Development Committee Member Shinpoch submitted Development Report report regarding the Dalpay appeal of Hearing Examnier's decision a pa 1ppea in Earlington area rezone, R-143-78. The Committee, after examina- Rezone R-143-78 tion of the record, the Hearing Examnier's written decision, 620 SW 12th St. findings, and conclusions, and tne written appeal determined that no error in fact or law exists, pursuant to Section 4-3016. There- fore, the Committee recommended that Council concur in the Hearing Examiner rezoning the property to L-1, subject to certain setback and landscaping conditions. MOVED BY SHINPOCH,. SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE AND REFER THE MATTER TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR PROPER FINANCE. CARRIED. Proposed L-2 The Planning and Development Committee recommended that an L-2 Zone for Small zoning ordinance be developed by the Planning and Development Manufacturing Plan Committee and the subject be referred back to the Planning and Land Use Areas Development Committee. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH TO CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. For Information- The Planning and Development Committee has reviewed tne Bitney Comprehensive request for Comprehensive Plan changes, denied by the Planning Land Use Change Commission. The Committee has referred the matter to the planning i staff for recommendation back to the committee. Renton City Council 6/19/78 Page 4 Old Business - Cont. SR 515 Transportation Committee Chairman Shinpoch reported the Committee has not reviewed nor reported back to the council the Benson Highway, SR 515 relocation matter because of the special meeting to be held by the Council on Thursday, June 22, 1978. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ordinance #3229 The Ways and Means Committee report recommended second and final H.A.S. Properties readings for the H.A.S. properties rezone which had been on first Inc. R-12278 reading 6-12-78; Ordinance was read changing the zoning classifi- cation of certain properties within the City of Renton from public use District (P-1 ) to business use classification (B-1 ) , located on Lake Ave. S. between S. 2nd and Airport Way. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND BY SHANE, COUNCIL ADOPT ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL VOTE - ALL AYES. MOTION CARRIED. Ordinance #3230 L.I.D. 307, The Committee recommended reading of an ordinance authorizing the interim issuance and sale of interest-bearing revenue warrants to be drawn financing on the "Local Improvement Fund, District No. 307" to provide funds for the interim financing of construction of certain improvements to be acquired in Local Improvement District No. 307. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY SHANE TO SUSPEND THE RULES AND ADVANCE THE ORDINANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL READING. CARRIED. After final reading it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY SHANE, TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. Roll call vote - all ayes. MOTION CARRIED. Resolution #2191 Resolution was read setting July 17, 1978 as date of hearing on Street Vacation proposed street vacation, petition filed by J. Nielsen on June 6, 1978, Nelson Place/ for vacation of that portion of Nelson Place and Charles Monster Road Monster Rd. No. 2 (County Road No. 8) . MOVED BY THORPE, SECOND SHANE TO ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Voucher The Ways and Means Committee Chairman reported Committee recommen- Approval dation for council approval of vouchers nos. 18413 thru no. 18642 in total amount of $333,065. 19, having received departmental cer- tification as to receipt of merchandise and/or services; plus L. I .D. 297 revenue and cash warrants , R-4, $375.88, C-4, $300.00 and, C-5, $75.88 plus L.I .D. #302 revenue and cash warrants , R-17, $1 ,672.88, C-29, $327.80, C-30, $960.00, C-31, $309.20, and C-32, $75.88. MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND SHANE TO CONCUR IN VOUCHER APPROVAL RECOMMENDATIONS. MOTION CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA The following items,are distributed to all Council Members and adopted by one motion without separate discussion (adopting motion follows agenda items) . King County EMS King County EMS contract to provide CPR training for Renton Middle--- - - contract for CPR and High School students. Refer to Public Safety Committee to. training to report back. school students Withdrawal of City withdraws notice of intent to Annex SR-167; Boundary Review SR-167 annexation Board reports Kent has annexed the Valley Freeway between SW 43rd and SW 142nd. Information. Welcome Wagon Mayor Delaurenti Proclamation, Official Welcome Wagon Week 7/16-22. Claim for Damages Claim for Damages - Olympic Pipe Line Co. $4,849.52, alleging damage Olympic Pipe Line by City of Renton contractor. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Co. Carrier. Hearing Examiner Hearing Examiner recommendation Fay C. Hill Rezone R-1 to R-2 subject Rezone Fay C. Hill to conditions, Tobin St. S. between Lake and Logan Ayes. S. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. (3j1z7 -._-.1 , ?:, 1 ' '-',, : "St9)1. i:Ci L.' -71 : -': : ,.;',-::1 :„!, ::.,'7'.: -:. ,'. ' - , ,..,:-, .;,,,:?:,.,:,.y: RENTON CITY 'COUNCI.L „ ' ' Regular. Meet:i ng, ', ' ,,,. .: , June 12, 1978 , ' Council Chambers Monday, 80O P .M. ..Municipa,l Building ' MINUTES` '. ,. . ' k CALL TO ORDER: - Mayor;.C. J. Delaurenti� led: thepled9eof Allegiance to the Flag and called the meeting of the Renton City COuncil to order. ROLL CALL OF " - ' . EARL CLYMER, Council: President; GEORGE' J. .,,:.PERRY, 'PATRICIA M. COUNCIL . SEYMOUR-THORPE, -RICHARD,, M. STREDI,CKE,. BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, CHARLES F; SHARE ;AND THOMAS :W:;','TRIMM: , . CITY .OFFICIALS CHARLES J: ,DELAURENTI;: Mayor; GWEN MARSHALL; Finance Director; DEL IN ATTENDANCE MEAD, City Clerk; LAWRENCE WARREN, Acting City Attorney; GORDON f Y. ERICKSEN, Planning„"Director; WARREN GONNASON, Public Works Director,;: DONALD CUSTER, Administrative Assistant, CAPT. BOURASA, . ' " Police Rep,; RICHARD;,-GEI:SSLER, ' Fi re .:Chief; JOHN WEBLEY, Parks and . ' Recreation Director ' PRESS GREG ANDERSON, Renton Record Chronicle, MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY-'CLYMER, SECOND PERRY, COUNC,I.L APPROVE. MINUTES OF JUNE 5, 1978 AS .PREPARED:AND,MAILED.. CARRIED. ; .OLD BUSINESS MOVED BY CLYMER, :SECON:D 'PERRY, COUNCIL AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR- AND , ; • Labor Contracts CITY 'CLERK TO EXECUTELAB.OR.CONTRACTS 'WITH. LOCAL 21R AND WITH • (See Page 2, THE POLICE GUILD AS: DISCUSSED AND APPROVED 'AT ;:EXECUTIVE SESSION Later Action) ' LAST WEEK AND UPON APPROVAL BY THE CITY ATTORNEY. CARRIED. Planning ,an '.l , Planning and Development Committee Chairman:'Perry asked more time Development :Report .regarding the Dal pay;,appeals,of Hearing;;,E`xamine.r's decision regard- Dalpay.'Appeal i ng the Earl i ngton,,area'`.rezone,::R-143 78. MOVED BY, THORPE, SECOND Rezone R-143 .78, SHINPOCH,; COUNCIL CONCURIN::,REQUESTOF,THE, PLANNING; AND DEVELOP- 620 SW 12th St. ' MENT COMMITTEE AND GRANT TIME EXTENSION ON THE 'REZONE APPEAL. MOTION CARRIED. -'-r,. Proposed Street MOVED BYySTREDICKE,‘.;SECOND THORPE COUNCIL RECONSIDER VACATION OF ;,,Vacation, of:portion ,PORTION.,OF NW 3RD;.;STREET AS APPROVED P1AY '22;' 1978. CARRIED. N.W.,:'3rd Street . Councilman Stred.i cke explained' letter from,City.Attorney Warren : ' Questioned :questioned status'_ of the roadwayrand, .therefore:,,.requested review. MOVED _BY STREDICKE, .SECOND THORPE,`COUNCI,L:'REFER ;THE .MATTER OF N.W. 3rd STREET VACATION BACK,TO, THE„WAYS'.„AND`.MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED._ ,Prevailing' Wage :''+,`..:..Counci,'lman Shane reported:;.:compla:is'rt:-of' labor unionsi ;re non-union ' , workers; b a i l di ng restaurant on property::leased. from'the City., icon- tendi ng::•requi rement to pay'prevafling: wage.,'was .union wage, 'City Attor- ney Warren noted',the City is-:required to accept the. lowest respon- -sible'bid. and cannot,.be.con:cernedwith�'union=or. -nonunion.. Proposed : ', .:moti'one',by�,:;Shane•that` p re.viai"l'�.i;n� '.'wage` b'e:;pai:d::on'•'..all leased; City: - y. P 9 9 p property.,.. fai led for',;lack.:of;°.a Second re �eO'q,,T Trans ortaion Commitee,.Chairwomanioch::'p s,e d,: . ransportaton :Co mmittee. , p p C� 'Committee Report report recommending acceptance''of 'the low`bid,;.of Paint-a-Line,--Inc. I n amount ;of $27,262 S9,S>,for Feder.a'.l;-Ai;d,;Safety. Demonstration Pro- . Bi'dd Award :, ,,'., . ,- ejects, Thermoplastic pavementmarkings, traffic buttons, center -and :,;; : Pavement Markers, - '.edge",striping asp.recommended;by;,the.,Pub:l:ic..-.Works" "Department. The -Buttons :and 1,, r-epor..t'.al'so recommended :the,.Mayor.'':and Ci ty,.Cl er.,k be authorized to .; `, Striping. • d ; , sign'th'e contract-',A0-64iohts, and.-=noted awar,d''conti ngent upon' receipt .by the; City of an "Authori zati on to Award' ,from' the 'Federal and State i` it, agencies: MOVED BY: SHINPOCH, SECOND CLYMER, COUNCIL .CONCUR IN'THE •••.COMMITTEE,`'RECOMMENDATION', Di:scuss'-ion..ensued ''that• only .one bid •was ' received, that project entirely funded°by outside "sources, Engineert !;,: `1 ings'estimate $60 ;00Ui.,,. ,Councilman:.Stredicke :-requested .report. from the' Administration of compa,rison of, regular pricing with cost E3 of - laid-on;,;stripes MOTON;CARRID � t _fi r i v c , . aye 44 Public:Safety _ Coinmi_ttee Cha=i rman,,;Trite: presentedaA:rep'ort recormiendi ng that the , ' '.-Committee, Report: Fire. P.rotec•ti on Master``PI an be referred to the Administration `for 4 /'5 'J- 7f-�,A 1 +7 YLe-e Renton. City Clerk 6/5/78 Page 15 CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT PUSINESS SR-515 j Letter from Arlene M. Zanga, 1609 Talbot Rd. S, called attention Public Hearing 6/22 to Council 's commitment to SR-515 approval . MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND TRIMM, REFER THE LETTER TO THE PUBLIC HEARING JUNE 22, 1978. CARRIED. Withdrawal from Letter from the Renton Police Officers Guild, John Pavone, Presi- Social Securijty ent requested consideration of steps necessary to remove the Renton Police Department and Police Officers' Guild from the ` United States Social Security System. Letter from Renton Manage- ment Association, W. Gonnason, President, stated that in view of the proposed rate increases for Social Security and the financial impact it will have on. the City budget, consideration of withdrawal from the Social Security System is requested. The letter noted an annuity insurance program to provide coverage for those employ- ees now covered by Social Security and at the end of required two-year time limit for withdrawal , the City's cost would be about 75% of cost of Social Security. Moved by Stredicke, Second Thorpe, refer to City's Negotiating Team. Substitute Motion by Thorpe, Second Trimm, refer to Budget Committee. Failed. SUB- STITUTE MOTION BY PERRY, SECOND THORPE, REFER TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE TO REPORT BACK. CARRIED. Shoreline Master Letter from Quendall Terminals , Donald 0. Norman, provided material Plan Revision' outlining steps taken` re application by Barbee Mill Co. for develop- Requested by ' ment of permit under the Shoreline Management Act,' re application Quendall Terminals for special grading permit regarding maintenance dredging at the mouth of the May Creek, re recommendation of the Planning Staff that permit be issued, re denial of permit by the Hearing Examiner upon opinion of. the City Attorney. The letter further explains belief that error exists in the Master Program and asks correction of wording which would be consistent with conditions of dredging permits issued by the State Department of Fisheries and the EPA. MOVED BY THORPE, SECOND PERRY, THIS MATTER RE REFER- RED TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Dalp.ay Appeal MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND CLYMER, THE DALPAY APPEAL R-143-78 BE HELD Rezone 143-78 OVER UNTIL NEXT WEEK. (Rezone 143-78, 620 SW 12th St. , G-6000 , Single Family to L-1 Light Industry had been requested. ) CARRIED. Dalpay Appeal Petition from Nick Petruska, William G. Fox, Betty Bauer and Rezone 145-78 S. A. Crookston, expressed belief that appeal letter filed by (See Page 1 ) i James W. Dalpay re Hearing Examiner's recommendation Rezone 145-78 did not constitute an appeal in accordance with City Code as it stated no specific errors of fact or law and no new evidence; therefore that Examiner' s decision of 4/11/78 should stand, noting belief that the residential property would not be in compliance with Comprehsive Plan if rezoned B-l . Moved by Perry, Second Clymer, Refer communication to the Planning and Development pending receipt of Hearing Examiner' s report. MOVED BY THORPE, SECOND STREDICKE, REFER COMMUNICATION TO THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR REVIEW IN THE RECONSIDERATION. SUBSTITUTE MOTION CARRIED. - NEW BUSINESS Councilwoman Thorpe requested change in agenda preparation that Letters of letters of commendation for City personnel be placed under the Commendation Correspondence and Current Business portion of agenda rather than Consent Agenda. Public Works Councilwoman Thorpe noted her concern and requested the Administra- Contracts . ! tion review the present procedure for drawing up contracts with Procedure j regard to financial responsibility. Public Works Director Gonnason noted complex procedure with Federal and State funding. I . Citizen Award Councilman Stredicke requested reinstatement of procedure for Requested Citizen Awards for outstanding service to the community and sug- • _. gested Erwin Fey, noting Mr. Fey's many years of maintaining high quality, family films;also noting Mr. Fey had. sold the theaters. , Renton City Council 6/5/78 Page 6 New Business - Continued • Senior Citizens' Councilman Shane inquired re adequate funding for the new Senior Center . Citizens ' Center and relocation of water and telemetry shop, suggesting Utility funds could not be used for the relocation and suggesting placement ,of 2% tax on paramutel betting and elimination of 6% utility tax. AUDIENCE COMMENT Parks and Recreation Director Webley presented metal box from the Old Earlington old Earlington School which had been found by the contractor dur- School Treasurers ing demolition. Webley also presented packet of papers from the box, noting the box and papers have been donated to the Renton Historical Society who will place the box and contents on display. Executive Session MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS LABOR NEGOTIATIONS. CARRIED. 10:05 P.M. All Council Members were present upon reconvening in regular ADJOURNMENT session. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL MEETING ADJOURN. CARRIED. 11 :10 P.M. Q. 7 Delores A. Mead C.M.C. City Clerk ' of-/ I t6(' GOUGE, MCBETH & FAULL ATTORNEYS AT LAW H.DONALD GOUGE P.O. BOX 26 ROBERT E.McBETH 505-B SOUTH THIRD STREET GARY F. FAULL RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 ALPINE 5-5600 May 18, 1978 Members of the City Council City of Renton Renton Municipal Building 2001Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: James W. Dalpay Appeal from Hearing Examiner' s Recommendation Hearing Examiner' s File No. R-143-78 Dear Council Members: On April 28, 1978, we filed our appeal from the recommenda- tion made by the Hearing Examiner in the above referenced matter. The appeal was filed at that time to meet your time deadline and was made before I had had a sufficient opportunity to review this matter and formulate a written statement in support of that appeal. I have now had an opportunity to review the matter more thoroughly and sub- . mit that the Hearing Examiner' s recommendation should be rejected for the reasons set forth in this letter. TheIproperty involved in this rezone request is situated at the corner of Union Avenue Northeast and Northeast 12thi Street, Renton, Washington. It is our understanding and position that this area has been designated as a "retail-commercial" use according to the Comprehensive Plan. The City Planning Department apparently disputes that contention, and the Hearing Examiner has accepted the Planning Department's position in that regard. (Findings 6 and 7) . Unfortunately, the record relating to the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan, and amendments thereto,, is not terribly clear, but we believe these findings to be incorrect and to constitute grounds for rejection on the IHearing Examiner' s recommendation. I am attaching herewith a copy of City Ordinance Nos. 2142 and 2439. As we understand the record of prior Council action in this regard, the original Comprehensive Plan was adopted by approval of a Comprehensive Land Use Map, rather than adoption of an ordinance setting forth speci- fic legal descriptions of the property effected. There- , Members of. the City Council City of. Renton May, 18,. '1978 - 'Page 2. after, the City Council has adopted several amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, each time setting forth the legal descrip- tions of the properties involved. The two cited Ordinances enclosed herein modify the .Comprehensive Plan as it effects this property. Under Ordinance No. 2142, this area was designated "retail-commercial" (Finding >Nb. • 7) . The Hearing Examiner then states that this designation was revised to "medium-density multi-family'!. under City Ordinance No. 2439 (Finding No. '7) . As I read Ordinance No. 2439, that. Finding is in error. Ordinance No. 2439 does not effect this property at all. It effects only property lying easterly of and southerly of our' site® This Ordinance did not change the Comprehensive Plan designation for our property, and it should therefore remain "retail-commercial" . •We believe that this is a proper land use ! designation for this property and that the rezone requested should be approved as: being in conformance with the Comprehen- sive Plan. Additionally, we feel that our proposal -is . consis.tent with the development which has occurred in the surrounding area and 'creates little conflict with the residential areas ' . lying to the south and west of the subject site. The property lying to the north and east of the subject site has been::.. developed into a rather intense- retail-commercial use. Our proposal for a low-profile business use is compatible with adjacent uses, blends in well with the adjacent residential uses, and should be approved. Lastly, we do not agree that our proposal is in any way in- consistent with or incompatible with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. We dispute.. the inference that approval of our request would in any way contribute to a reduction in property values or contribute to a decay or obsolescence in adjacent residential areas. We _feel. that . this, proposal would encourage the development 'and utiliza- tioniof the land to, its highest and best use and would promote the best interest of the community and contribute to its over;-all attractiveness and desirability as a place in which to work, shop, live and play. , We see no reason presented for denial of this rezone. request and would ask that the same now be approved. Very ly ours, /Pc •OBERT E. McBETH REMcB:mr ' 111111 Sc; 1- 1819o,? GOUGE, MCBETH & FAULL ;�� Jy � ATTORNEYS AT LAW ' J, H. DONALD GOUGE P. O. BOX 26 MAY 1978 g:; ROBERT E.McBETH 505-B SOUTH THIRD STREET GARY F. FAULL RENTON,WASH INGTON 95055 RECEIVED ALPINE 5-5600 0" CITY of RENTON ,., May 18, 1978CLERK'S OFFICE •1 ' The! Honorable Charles J. Delaurenti, Mayor Members of the Renton City Council Renton Municippl Building 2001Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: James W. Dalpay Appeal from Hearing Examiner's Recommendation Hearing Examiner's File No. R-143-78 Dear Mayor Delaurenti and Members of the Renton City Council: I have been retained to represent Mr. James W. Dalpay, applicant in the above referenced matter, and have been asked to assist him in seeking review of the decision rendered by the City of Renton Hearing Examiner in the above referenced matter. The Hearing Examiner submitted his formal report and recommendation to the City Council, dated April 14, 1978, recommending that the City Council approve the requested reclassification of the property to an L71 zone subject to certain conditions relating to set- backs and landscaping requirement's. On April 28 , 1978 , we filed our "Request for Reconsideration" with the Office of the Hearing Examiner requesting that the restrictive covenants relating to setback and landscaping be modified to allow greater use of the property. Our Request for Reconsideration was denied by letter from the Hearing Examiner on May 5, 1978. Having no other recourse, we hereby file this appeal from the recommendation and decision now rendered by the Hearing Examiner in this matter and submit herewith our check in the sum of $25.00 in payment of the filing fee required pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 30, City ,Code, as amended. Specifically, we ask that the City Council reconsider and alter that portion of the Hearing Examiner's recom- mendation that effects setback and landscaping requirements. As we, understand the Hearing Examiner's decision, he is requiring a minimum setback/landscaping area of 20 feet The Honorable Charles J. Delaurenti, Mayor Members of the Renton City Council May'' 18., 1978 - Page 2 along Southwest 12th Street; 10 feet along the east property line;. and 10 feet along the north property line. By themselves, these requirements would pose very little problem for us and would,, in general, be acceptable. However, when this require- ment is combined with the City's requirement for offstreet parking, the combination creates an undue hardship for the appli- cant. The City of Renton presently requires 'a minimum area of 18 feet in width to accommodate the necessary offstreet parking necessary for this building. That results in a total land area of approximately 5,000 square feet being committed to offstreet parking. The City's requirement for landscape/setback areas results in 7,920 square feet committed for this purpose. The total of these two, requirements, results in a substantial portion of the available land area being committed to offstreet parking, landscape/setback requirements. We do not feel that this leaves a sufficient area remaining to make the proposed build- ing development economically feasible. We sincerely ask that these requirementsbe altered as the present decision would require 67% of the available land area being committed to landscaping/offstreet parking. We feel that this is excessive. As we understand the conditions that have been imposed upon us by the Hearing Examiner, it appears to us that the Hearing Examiner is attempting to i?nco:rp:orat.e requirements of a' Manufacturing Park, zone .into the L-1 zone we have requested. ' It seems to me that 'we are entitled to an L-1 zone without the additional requirements for landscaping/setback being imposed upon us. We have previously. proposed that the Hearing Examiner' s recommendation be modified to permit a combination 20 foot setback/landscaping/parking area along Southwest 12th Street, and a combination 10 foot setback/landscaping/parking area ',along both the, east and north ;property lines. In effect, we are asking that the' applicant be allowed to intermingle landscaping areas with parking areas within the allotted 20 foot setback area. ' Obviously, .. if such a. proposal were accepted, al detailed landscape :plan would have to be' .submitted to and be:-..approved by the Renton Planning Department as part of the building permit, application. We feel that this proposal complies with the requirements of an L-l. zone and is fully compatible with the development which has occurred on adjacent properties. Our proposal would permit an area of approximately 3 to 5 . feet along Southwest 12th Street with additional areas set' aside !within the adjacent 18 feet for landscaping. A possible The Honorable Charles J. Delaurenti, Mayor Members of the Renton City Council May 18, 1978 Page 3 site plan is enclosed with this letter to provide an example of our proposal. Obviously, this is a very rough sketch,. but I believe it shows the general concept of what we have in mind. We' ask that ' this request be given your serious considera- tion and hope that the recommendation of the Hearing Examiner can be modified, accordingly. 'As 'stated 'in the Hearing Examiner's report and findings, our original ,request conforms to the goals and. objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and is totally consistent with other development which has occurred in the area. The physical characteristics of this land make the setback requirements which the Hearing Examiner. has imposed very onerous. We feel that these requirements impose a substantial hardship on the applicant and fail to accomplish any real purpose as far as theiCity of Renton is . concerned. Our proposal takes nothing away from the City, but still allows our development to occur within reasonable limits. We, sincerely hope 'that you will review the Hearing Examiner' s decision in this matter and that you will modify his recom- mendation in 'light of this request. ' Ve t ly yipljejyt rs, A /c ROBERT E. MCBETH . REMcB:mr Enclosures OP • • . . . . • r\ • : � §. . . . . . . . .�t : » /:\ < : m . /. �/ . . . \ K »v© ��\ � � ��/ . . . » § < : < . . 4OF 0 THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 pCHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • DELORES A. MEAD 0 41- CITY CLERK FD SEPtW ' May 19 , 1978 APPEAL FILED BY Robert E . McBeth, Attorney, on behalf of James W. Dalpay Re : Appeal of Land Use "Examiner' s Decision dated 5/5/78, R-143-78, James W. Dalpay Rezone from G-6000 to L-1 To Parties of Record: Appeal of Land Use hearing Examiner' s decision has been filed with the City Clerk' s Office on May 18, 1978, along with the proper fee of $25. 00, pursuant to Title 4 , Ch . 30, City Code, as amended. The City Code requires the appeal must be set forth in writing. The written appeal and all other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council ' s Planning and Development Committee. Please contact the Council Secretary, 235-2586 , for date and time of the committee meetings if so desired. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the above-referenced appeal will be considered by the Renton City Council at its regular meeting of June 5, 1978 at 8 : 00 p .m. in the Council Chambers , Second Floor, Renton Municipal Building, 200 • Mill Ave . S . Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON Ain-Ad( 74 Delores A. Mead City Clerk DAM:mc cc: Mayor Planning Director Planning & Development Committee and City Council Members Public Works Director Land Use. Hearing Examiner Finance Director Building Division . r . OF Ft THE CITY OF RENTON • elp 7 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o NIL 8 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI ► MAYOR • DELORES A. MEAD o (o* � CITY CLERK 0 �4ED SE PIV4. May 19 , 1978 APPEAL FILED BY Robert •E . McBeth, Attorney, on behalf of James W. Dalpay. Re : Appeal of Land Use Examiner ' s Decision dated 5/5/78, R-143-78 , James W. Dalpay Rezone from G-6000 to L-1 To Parties of Record: Appeal of Land Use Hearing Examiner' s decision has been filed with the City Clerk ' s Office on May 18, 1978, along with the proper fee of $25 . 00 , pursuant to Title 4, Ch. 30, City Code, as amended. The City Code requires the appeal must be set forth in writing. The written appeal and all other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council ' s Planning and Development Committee . Please contact the Council Secretary, 235-2586 , for date and time of the committee meetings if so desired. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the above-referenced appeal will . be considered by the Renton City Council at its regular meeting of June 5, 1978 at 8 : 00 p. m. in the Council Chambers , Second Floor, Renton Municipal Building, 200 Mill Ave . S . Yours very truly , P . S . This is to advise that CITY OF RENTON appeal on R-145-78 has been continued to 6/5/78 and will also be considered by the council along with R-143-78 on that date . Delores A. Mead . City e Clerk DAM:mc cc : Mayor Planning Director Planning & Development Committe and City Council Members Public Works Director Land Use Hearing Examiner Finance Director Building Division / G �y (11 o THE CITY OF RENTON V �� r Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 co' ammo —� CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593 0,fl4rEO SEPS� May 22, 1978 Members, Renton City Council Renton, Washington RE: File No. R-143-78; James W. Dalpay; Appeal to the City Council. Dear ,Council Members: Because the Examiner's recommendation on the referenced rezone application was appealed to the City Council on May 18, 1978, I am forwarding for your review copies of the applicant's previous letter requesting reconsideration, dated April 24, 1978, and the Examiner's subsequent letter denying the request, dated May 5, 1978. Sincere L. is Beeler ,-,�222 Hearing Examiner r �1 Attachments o MAY 1978 � cc: Planning Department �� ity Clerk �� Y o= = t. pF I �, 0 THE CITY OF RENTON ®� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 z o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 'O q- L. RICK BEELER , 235-2593 O ,� �4TED SEP1 0' May 5, 1978 Robert E: McBeth Gouge, McBeth & Faull P.O. Box 26 Renton, WA 98055 RE: , File No. R-143-78; James W. Dalpay; Request for Reconsideration. Dear Mr. McBeth: Your letter of April 28, 1978, contained information very similar to Mr. Dalpay's testimony in the public hearing. No new information was presented nor was substantiation received for the consideration request apparently based upon Section 4-3015 (Hearing Examiner Ordinance) . My recommendation to the City Council was essentially a continuation of the precedent established in the O'Brien (R-885-76) and Divelbiss (R-016-77) rezones. The specified landscape strips were required in order to accomplish as much of the Manufacturing Park character, in the midst of several single family residences, as possible per the Comprehensive Plan for the area. Another look at Exhibit #3 (Conceptual Plot Plan) revealed that apparently sufficient property exists to accommodate parking requirements while complying with the conditions of the rezone. It is a normal requirement that landscape areas be devoted exclusively to landscaping. These landscaping areas were deemed necessary to accomplish the general objectives of the Comprehensive Plan (M-P) and transitional buffering of existing single family residences. In the 'public hearing the existing alley was discussed in terms of access but I would suggest exploring parking alternatives as well for near the alley with the Planning Department. Perhaps a solution could be found there. The circumstances surrounding the property (e.g. Comprehensive Plan and existing single family residences) seem to require the conditions specified . in my recommendation to the City Council. Justification in these terms has not been presented to warrant changing this recommendation. dtligiff, , e L. •ick Beeler Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department • GOUGE, MCBETH & FAULL ATTORNEYS AT LAW RECEIVED H. DONALD GOUGE P.O. BOX 26 Cll'Y OF RENTONROBERT E.McBETH 505-B SOUTH THIRD STREET GARY F. FAULL HEARING EXAMINER RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 APR 2 81978 ALPINE 5-5600 AM PM April 28, 1978 7o8l9118i11,12i1i213m4,54 Mr. L. Rick Beeler • Hearing Examiner City of Renton Renton, Washington 98055 RE: JAMES W. DALPAY File No. R=143-78 • Request for Reconsideration Dear Sir: I have been retained .to represent Mr.. James W. Dalpay, applicant in the above referenced matter.,'. and have been -asked to assist. him in seeking review- of the decision which) you have rendered in the above'referen:ced matter.. Specifically, we ask that you reconsider that portion of your decision that affects setback and landscape requirements for this property. As we understand your decision, you are requir- ing al minimum setback/landscaping "area of 20 feet along SW 12th Street; 10 feet along the East property line, and ' 10 feet along ,the North property line. By themselves , these requirements would pose very little problem for us • and would generally be .acceptable. However, when this requirement is combined 'with the City's requirement for. off-street parking, the combination creates an undue hardship for Mr: Dalpay. The ' City of Renton presently requires a minimum area of . 33 feet in width to accommodate the necessary off-street parking required for this building. That results in a total ~land !area ' of approximately 5000 square feet being committed to off-street parking. Your requirement for landscape/set- backlareas result in' 7920 square feet committed for this purpose. The total of these two requirements result in a sub- stantial portion of the available land area being committed to off-street parking, landscaping/setback requirements. We ' do not feel -that this leaves a sufficient area remaining to make'ithe proposed building development .economically feasible. 'We sincerely ask that these requirements be reconsidered. According to my. calculations , your decision would require 67% of the available land • area being committed to landscaping/ off-street parking. This seems excessive to me. Page 2 Mr. L.: Rick Beeler April 28, 1978 . As stated above, either of these requirements , by themselves , would be acceptable. Accordingly, we would ask that your decision be modified to permit a combination 20-foot :setback/landscaping/parking area along- SW 12th Street, and a coMbination 10-foot :;setback/landscaping/ parking area along both the East and North property lines . In effect, we are asking that we be allowed to intermingle landscaping areas with parking areas within the allotted 20-foot : setback area. ' Obviously, if such a proposal were' accepted, a detailed landscape plan would have to be sub- mitted to and be approved by the Renton Planning Department as part of the building permit application. Our proposal would permit an area of approximately 3 .- '5 feet along SW 12th Street, with additional areas set aside within the adjacent 18 feet for landscaping. A possible site plan is enclosed with. this letter -to provide an example of our proposal. Obviously, this is a very rough sketch, but I believe that it shows the general concept of what we have in mind. We sincerely hope that this request will be , given, your serious consideration and that your decision can be modified accordingly. As stated in your report and findings , our original request conforms to the goals and objectives of the Compre- hensive Plan and is totally 'consistent with other development which has occurred in the area. The physical characteristics of this land make the ::.setb.a,.ck. requirements which you have imposed very onerous. We feel that those requirements impose substantial hardship on Mr. Dalpay and fail to accomplish any real purpose as far as the City of Renton is concerned. Our proposal takes nothing away from the City, but still allows our development to occur within reasonable limits . • We sincerely hope that you will reconsider your" previous decision in this matter and that your decision will be modified in light of this request-_ Ver, ly curs , C ROBERT E . McBETH • REM: jj cc: Mr. Dalpay • • Vi,,�ty rt Y� t , v Ii i, Ilti`.- • } I l � 0F v THE CITY OF RENTON al 7 V ®� MUNICIPAL BUILDING . 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 z o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI I MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER O co- L. RICK BEELER , 235-2593 ��TfO SEP1t*O April 28, 1978 • Members, Renton City Council Renton, Washington RE File No. R-143-78; James W. Dalpay; Request for Reconsideration. Dear Council Members: A request for reconsideration of the referenced application was received by the Examiner this date within the 14-day appeal period established by ordinance. Therefore, the request, which was transmitted to you on April 21,' 1978, will not appear on the Council agenda on May 8, 1978 as previously scheduled. You will receive notice of any action and copies of all correspondence relating to this matter as soon as they are available. Sine ely;"-7 L. Rick eeler Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department pF 41 o THE CITY OF RENTON `$ © MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 0 I CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER co- 4 p F43- L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593 4)4TFD SEP10O April 21, 1978 Members, Renton City Council Renton, Washington RE: File No. R-143-78; James W. Dalpay. Dear1 Council Members: Attached is the Examiner's Report and Recommendation on the referenced rezone request, dated April 14, 1978. The appeal period for the application expires on April 28, 1978, and the report is being forwarded to you for review by the Planning and Development Committee following the seven-day period from the date of publication. The licomplete file will be transmitted to the City Clerk on May 1, 1978, andiwill be placed on the Council agenda on May 8, 1978. If you require additional assistance or information regarding this matter, please contact the undersigned. S' r y, L. is Beeler Hearing Examiner cc: City Clerk Planning Department Attachment AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King • Marilyn J. Petersen , being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 14th day of April , 19 78 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing . a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. v t/ Subscribed and sworn this \' day of 19 `VI( ; • Notary Public in. and . for thq • of Washington; residing atreEtt n 'sQ; .`i" Application, Petition or Case: James W. Dalpay, R-143-78 11�� • � (The i►u.nwtea contain a .eiAt o4 the paicti.e4 og hedond) R-143-78 Page Two Mr. Smith advised that the setbacks on the Dive lbiss property average nine feet to 36 feet from east to west on S.W. 12th Street. Mr. Dalpay questioned the accuracy of the • setback measurement on the eastern corner of the site and advised that he had recently surveyed and measured the property. He also felt that conformance to a 30-foot average setback would not allow best use of his property because of the unusual configuration of the lot. The Examiner asked for testimony in support or opposition to the application. There was no response. He then asked Mr. Smith for additional comments. Mr. Smith revised the Planning Department recommendation for average setback requirements on the southerly property line adjacent to S.W. 12th Street from 30 to 25 feet to allow parking space at the rear of the structure and provide compatibility with the parallelogram-shape of the site. He noted that because improvement of the existing alley on the northern boundary of the property would not occur until a future date, access to the site would probably be provided from S.W. 12th Street: The Examiner asked the applicant for additional comments. Mr. Dalpay stated his opinion that setback requirements would interfere with provisions for parking space on the north and landscaping on the south side of the property, and advised that construction of additional structures on the eastern portion of the site is anticipated. For this reason, he felt that the setback requirements would decrease aesthetic value of the proposed development. In response to the Examiner's inquiry regarding 'the possibility of orienting the building parallel to S.W. 12th Street, Mr. Dalpay indicated that extension to the east would be necessary and would result in interference with future plans for that location on the site. The Examiner asked Mr. Smith for additional comments, modifications or revisions to Exhibit #1. Mr. Smith indicated that the report would remain as submitted with the exception of the revision of setback requirement on the southerly property line from - 30 to 25 feet with a minimum setback at the southwest corner of no less than five feet. He recommended that parking areas be located at the rear of the structure concurrent with development of the alley and that landscaping be located at the front of the building. He suggested that the alley be eventually utilized for access to the subject site, and noted that details of the plan will be reviewed during the building permit process. Mr. Smith emphasized that consideration of the unusual configuration of the property be given in review to maintain a balance to allow reasonable development of the site and also retain compatibility with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Manufacturing Park zoning. In response to the Examiner's inquiry regarding conformance of the Divelbiss property development to established restrictive covenants, Mr. Smith reported that although measurements taken from the approved Building Division plans indicated conformance, final inspection of the property had not yet occurred. The Examiner asked the applicant if the revised Planning Department recommendation for a 25-foot setback on the southerly property line was acceptable. Mr. Dalpay expressed a preference for a 15-foot setback and advised that a 10-foot setback currently exists on the site. In response to the Examiner's statement regarding the flexibility of the proposed building configuration in width and length, Mr. Dalpay advised that a limit of 50 feet had been established as maximum width to provide necessary parking space on the northern portion of the site. The Examiner asked for further comments. Since there were none, the hearing on File No. R-143-78 was closed by the Examiner at 9:45 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The request is for approval of a rezone of approximately 24,000 square feet from G-6000 to L-1. 2. The Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues, applicable policies and provisions, findings of fact, and departmental recommendations in this matter and is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference as set forth in full therein. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended by R.C.W. 43.21.C. , a Declaration of Non-Significance • has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official. . April 14, 1978 • OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON • REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICANT: James W. Dalpay FILE NO. R-143-78 LOCATION: Vicinity of 620 S.W. 12th Street SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests the approval of an eight-lot proposed rezone from G-6000 to L-1 to allow the property to be used for a warehouse with upholstery shop. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval with restrictive covenants RECOMMENDATION: • Hearing Examiner: Approval with. restrictive covenants • • PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department staff report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on April 5, 1978. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the,application, and • field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on April 11, 1978 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were sworn. • It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. Michael Smith, Planning Department, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following . additional exhibits into, the record: Exhibit #2: King County Assessor's Map Exhibit #3: Conceptual Plot Plan • Exhibit #4: Vicinity Map • Referencing Section P.1, of Exhibit #1, Mr. Smith advised that averages had been computed to establish, setback requirements because of the parallelogram configuration of the site. He noted that the subject site is larger than two parcels of property previously rezoned in the immediate area and that averages had also been computed to arrive at setback requirements for these sites. • The Examiner asked the applicant if he concurred in Exhibit #1. Responding was: James W. Dalpay P.O. Box 2436 Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Dalpay indicated his concurrence in the report with the exception of setback requirements. He submitted photographs of the Divelbiss 'property referenced by, Mr. Smith located adjacent to the subject site in order to illustrate possible nonconformance to setback requirements established by restrictive covenants during recent rezone of the property. The photographs were labeled by the Examiner as follows: Exhibit #5: Photograph of the Divelbiss property taken from the southeast corner at S.W. 12th Street facing north. Exhibit #6: Photograph of the Divelbiss property taken from the southwest corner facing north on Raymond Avenue S.W. Exhibit #7: Photograph of the Divelbiss property taken facing due east.' • R-143-78 Page Four 4. The recommendation by the Planning Department that the _front yard setback (along S.W. 12th Street) be computed on the basis of the average dimension is not provided for in the zoning regulations or in Ordinance No. 3125 (Divelbiss rezone) . Setbacks are measured parallel to the property lines per the minimum specified distances (20 feet per Sections 4-712. (C) and 4-711.D for the L-1 zone and Ordinance No. 3125. Deviation from this requirement can occur through only the variance process and lies outside the purview of the Examiner. RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the record, testimony, findings and conclusions, it is the recommendation of the Examiner that the City Council approve reclassification of the property to L-1 subject to the following conditions being attested to in the form of restrictive covenants: 1. A minimum 20-foot setback along S.W. 12th Street; a minimum 10-foot setback along the east property line; and a minimum 10-foot setback along the north property line. 2. A minimum 20-foot landscape strip adjacent to S.W. 12th Street; a minimum 10-foot landscape strip adjacent to the east property line; and minimum 10-foot landscape strip adjacent to the north property line. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Renton Planning Department as part of the building permit application. 3. Outside storage of materials, equipment, and containers may be permitted within the buildable area of the property, when said storage is properly screened by a sight-obscuring fence not less than six feet in height nor more than 10 feet in height, together with a minimum five-foot landscape strip subject to review and approval of the Planning Department. ORDERED THIS 14th day of April, 1978. . i k Be ler Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 14th day of April, 1978 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: James W. Dalpay, P.O. Box 2436, Renton, WA 98055 TRANSMITTED THIS 14th day of April, 1978 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Councilwoman Patricia Seymour-Thorpe Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Ron Nelson, Building Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before April 28, 1978. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the City Clerk's office, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in said office. R-143-78 Page Three • 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected byithe impact of 'this development. 5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 6. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. • • 7. The proposed conceptual plot plan (Exhibit #3) is not compatible with the required front and sideyard setbacks of Section 4-730 (M-P) ,but is compatible with the setback requirements of Section 4-712 (L-1) of Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances. 8. Within the vicinity, two rezone applications have been approved for L-1 subject to conditions very similar to those recommended by the Planning Department (O'Brien, R-885-76, and Divelbiss, R-016-77) . The latter application immediately abuts the westerly boundary of Mr. Dalpay's property. The conditions imposed upon the Divelbiss property were: a. A minimum 20-foot setback along S.W. 12th Street; a minimum 10-foot setback along the east property line; and a minimum 10-foot setback along the north property line. • b. A minimum 20-foot landscape strip adjacent to S.W. 12th Street; a minimum 10-foot landscape strip adjacent to the east property line; and a minimum 10-foot landscape strip adjacent to the north property line. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Renton Planning Department as part of the building permit application. c. Outside storage of materials, equipment, and containers may be permitted•, within the buildable area'of the property, when ,said storage is properly screened by a sight-obscuring fence not less than six feet in height nor more than 10 feet in height, together with a minimum five-foot .landscape strip subject to review and approval of the Planning Department. 9. The area encompassed by FAI-405, S.W. Grady Way, and State Highway 167 was originally platted into small single family lots under G-6000 zoning. Some single family development occurred over the years; however, for the past several years commercial and industrial uses have,been located in this area (Section 4-3014. (C) ) . The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map indicates this transitional trend in the designation of Manufacturing Park for the area (Section 4-3014. (B) ) . Due to the configuration of the platted lots (100-foot depth) , it is difficult to meet the setback requirements of the M-P zone. The setback requirements of the L-1 zone can be met. 10. The last area land use analysis was apparently completed for this area in 1970 during review of the Green River Valley element of the Comprehensive Plan. • Testimony was not provided regarding whether specific rezone classification . was considered at that time relative to the subject site (Section 4-3014. (A) ) . ✓CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proposal conforms to the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan (Section 4-3014. (B) ) . 2. Development in the area and adjacent to the subject site have impacted the property significantly since the previous land use and zoning analysis of the . area (Section 4-3014. (C) ) . 3. The City Council has established clear precedent for this request in the O'Brien and Divelbiss rezones. It seems appropriate to require the same conditions of Mr. Dalpay as was required of the Divelbiss application and continue the type of development that responds to the unusual conditions surrounding properties in this area. Essentially, the required setbacks would represent in Mr. Dalpay's property the minimum requirements of the L-1 zone except for an additional five feet of side • yard setback. The other conditions incorporate portions of the M-P zone requirements, thereby' increasing conformity with the Manufacturing Park designation of the Comprehensive Plan. •'""'"--....---4i4-4....... ......12‘ .4., 4.,, ....; • .- .-.at. AA,.44......4.4,;.1..:k...4., "4,, ... 4.,..` .C. •.0 •.., • • . 1. kx: .4.1.• , % . 4 . ' VACaLsi g4(glib 54 ' , . . . , 1 itoi;0!'1 ,Viii frati halms '. 4 '•': ;'''',-:.?'-' Val . . • . , . • ,. .. - ......-- . .. .. .. ,..,,, ....., ' . . . . 9 • . . ..... ...,. • . - -•.- " ,- , ..-- • ..-- ,. ,-......., .. • ,,, , . . . . . if- %I°• Irg'-'rk*:.--''''.. -' ' .4 "•• - • . . ...• ..-- -•-' - ,..- • ' . . ;. , . . . . . .„.. ••• ....,. ...---' .... ., - ., -. .... '1%, . . .., g -, --; •m- ,- •*• -, ..o, .; . . „.. . . . ..,....:.,...:. . . ...,,,,,:......" . ... ... , T.- , • . .. I:1 1:::1.1 % 'Le . ., .•• '''''-- . ' SO ' ' - - ti U.; 0 't .--• . .. ,..'• ",.. " 0. .. . .. .. . . . c0 14, , a “.tisi .,;‘,- , „,„,,„„,„, • ...u .. - c.tos . • , . r .? . 0.--- '3 .. -.% ::' '' 41 . . ...... - -: . . . .... ,.. , _...........iiiiii . , d .....,,, ,_ ,,, _.,...• ,...• ,...v._ .....„, ....•- - . ..... . . . ...... ...... ., . . . . . . . .„. .... . , ,.. . i, • 405 . . . . . . ... ... .. . ... _ .. . . . . .. . ... . . .... . . . . ,...... . 6 • , ... I ..,, „....,...,.. , ...„.: • . . ,, • , . ,. ,W.MssierressmaticaUMMMIkIWORNOINS.> . . . . . . - • rip f:CAL'S 1 II 2: loo' Zutea stis mg • imeteb L phLpf REZGNIE 4 R-1434d -,.15,txxs. 1 I.-- , 1 . -. ,. i . 1 •f" • !I• .••I•,I• , .. ...•'..,' • . ' . . . I, . . • . - , .. , - . ,.. . 0 c . , ..-.. ..„ .....--....i,„ar , - ' P C.% . / .. . .. G . . .. - ..• ,„ .. • _ _ __-_,_,_.•__:_--,. , ,• . !;} _ ..ii, 15, kl"/ • 7r.L4 1--1-: _,.... .-- • • • • 1.7--1.,,f;-- - .,' ----,-- 1---' B.1 i . -......,LY ' 12 _ •••.... "--.'' .'71>'• !* 1.- I igl i .. .'. 1••'''', . ir '• ,i L ,:v , ... ...,,,, . -s4:...ii ...i.— ,,,,- ..„ ‹l: . , I .., I .._ . LA in u -k, IVIII :7".-; ,..,: ,:‘ ..1:::,i..1. *:11,-,! i . • ( __-----: \•. , ...•.0..__:- t I 14! - -- ...•!,.Er. ---- 1 I ...*•--1;er7:''' „OOP I I --. ' .4 . - ,...:.::::::44Cild10111116.1 i fill ri ; MI i 1 ,N - • R- 01110 I I im" 0111 IIP(*rif 1 1 1 k 1 L. b.'', .,..c,,r2,4c-s ,.-• -- ,• mot i 110 , 2 Ill T ,A. , ov-i•e 701'-• . ' ••ii 11110111!1 , , A 44444444141... ...... 1 0 : - rif \' • . 1 // • , I ,' \ I , . - le --,-, - 011011i.",1,i;1.' it ' ill I- -: • 1 ul jj I V., , I _ 1 - . . .., ,- --,0, • , . di!, - og.I.... • 0 Ink.•ic i Ail'1 ,0 IlLas ' I -- \ • --11,,,...----77-ro:s. . id • 10°. •_„01;grip 1 i iiR : . .II il I 0001:-I 1 r 11111,10 IFPF.- / ,., 06 ii. n , -..., , ..,-,:..1,•!: ...0 • ....- _•_,..•-•:. ' t:-,,, 7'' ---."" A 01,.....:: iettedi00"" .4 I H.Pi:r •;'.. 1 . .._:.._.,...,1w,-,..---,--±r..7.7.-7. 71:7..?-• , , , , :. 4________,..iri.h_esijol. _._t.....-1-A -• -..,-.-.--.L.:,-."=---:-=-• •-z- -'-' :7---.--. . 110. ' ' allil I.Ili 1" ..„,,-.:;-,--:•.„.., • ,._ •.Hr.,:.,...i,, -i\ ,• • • . kj • 4C) .------- , . : , .:„..-.sier-- ---•,,,cs .." ireillala CI • _ ,.. _.:, i:...101 , ,.-...,. ; .-1.. .-, , • -., ! ' - 1 . ...-• „„..--..--„:::-..:-- .__ ci 0111 •-...,-.:" i $ • am I.- :,-, i • . , ., ,b 11 "-' - - -----. ---7-,0,:--•-I •1 .--- ii•,.-i:1' ' 'S 7 . -.;.'-'• t. . , 4'. .-', '. ': •": 7 - 1.11-.2.... .1:...-...' -' gul il ,;..B—I 1A. " ,• .:L': — 1-Gr, G.' 6906" ',J: . ! - it, i; • ... • . , ‘• ,.. ,i1. .i.,,.. . ,....., .• ,..,..., ; ..iii -•-•.': •-• 1 i ...(04-6vt) ••_. •-;.- L'! 'Ft ..•'\‘4 !..• \ ''.a..,...:...1;.-,..- i 1:ii;. -7.• : .; • •i 1-i 1, • '''..•; ;.1.:.•••,:. - „ .. . -. !•• 4. („1, ti . -- G ink , T.".:, • . . 1,.. . — - :-,..--.-H , ._ •1 . ..:... ; 1 1 •-, •••• . -,, 24 ,L-.. . .. A .--- ; • . . , .. ..A . / \ : • i _#' A ; C., 1-: ii --r 1,7_2_, ro, ,oi ••:. z. A VI ". \ ( ,J \ •1 4 •1 1 . i ' i'.,?! I '•:. \ . n• ;.cl. : ;,.w; . 0.1 i „... „ 6.1 . ' ) ! • :: •'i f u , • • . .4 . i•,..:, ... ..•; I ,.. ,•. ...: ;;'4; • •i: ! ' i: -:, ' • • , . . :1;---....1, . ; I % :i-.1.• ..1>: .• : : 1. • . , ..,; -.‘ • . 1 it_.4,-.L1....'-'.'1.!.._CS..9.......,292_47..Lk^Z..a,_L•±!!"riifi..Aimi - - : 1 i- Re; -•1 PaT,' • — .., . ad U 19 , . •. . . . ; • 1 •a 7 irr , • , ,. : .: :. : • .••:-•••_.__•• . k - ' '• -4+ : ': c .t_:: -1 .I. : •,•••a - t- ....1.17i---- \, • . ,7 6 1; G• ..,• u . . 0 , ‘ct•, 1 1, , Lt - :. . • t --1 -HI-- ..--\.,--L)- — i_ ' _ l • I , . , i . _ . -- • - -- ••--..______.--'' / ' 0 • . ... 2 • REZONE: • . , JAMES W. DALPAY , APPLICATION FOR. REZONE FROM G-6000 TO L-1 ; File No . • R- 143-78; property located in vicinity of 620 S. W. 12th Street tetween Raymond Avenue S. W. and Seneca Avenue S. W. •• . ' . . • . _ ,, • • •• . : , •• ., . , - - ' . - • • . • APPLICANT . JAMES W. DALPAY TOTAL AREA ±24,000 sq . ft. Via S. W. 12th Street PRINCIPAL ACCESS . , EXISTING ZONING • . G,6000, Si,ngle Family Residential • • EXISTING USE Undeveloped • ,. . . . • PROPOSED USE • Warehouse with Upholstery Shop . COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN • Manufacturing Park . , • " COMMENTS . , . , . . . % . . . . . . . . . . • , ., . ... ., . . .. • . . .. . . . • . - • . • • . , . . •• ' . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . • , . . . . , . . . • . ., • minvisnet. .:! *,.,. . , ,..• ..,„,. , .., , . . - • • . . . .. . • ,. . . , • , • is 2 RECEIVED I _ CITY OF RENTON i k PLANNING DEPARTMENT HEARING EXAMINER ] ': ! PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER APR 111978 AM PM I , I PUBLIC HEARING 718191101111121112131415,6 I APRIL 11 , 1978 ,' APPLICANT: JAMES W. DALPAY EXHIBIT O. / , , FILE NO. :, R-143-78, REZONE ' -- ITEM NO. / - 71 A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The Applicant requests the approval of an 8-lot proposed rezone from '.G-6000 to L-1 to allow the property to be used for a ware- ' house, with upholstery shop . B. GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record : JAMES W. DALPAY 2 . Applicant: JAMES W. DALPAY 3 . Location : Vicinity of 620 S. W. 12th Street. 4. Legal Description : . A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton 1 Planning Department. 5 . Size of Property : ±24 ,000 square feet 1 6 . Access : Via S . W. 12th Street. 7. Existing Zoning : G-6000 , General Classification 1 District, Single Family Residen- tial , minimum lot size 6 ,000 1 square feet . 8. Existing, Zoning /i`n rtpe Area : G-6000 , Single Family Residence District ; L-1 , Light Industrial ; M-P , Manufacturing Park. 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Manufacturing Park ' 10. Noltification :. ' The applicant was notified in 1 writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle and posted in 3 places on or near the site as required by City ordinance. C. PURPOSE OF REQUEST: To allow rezone of the subject site for future development of light industrial and commercial uses . D. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The site was annexed into the City by Ordinance No. 1745 ( 1959) , Amendment Ordinance No . 1764 ( 1959) , and Amendment Ordinance No . 1928 ( 1961 ) . E. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography : The site is generally level with a slight northerly rise at the north boundary. 2. Soi!ls : Urban Land (Ur) ; erosion hazard is slight to moderate. 3. Vegetation : The site is covered by a dense mixture of grass , I' short to medium shrubs and some tall deciduous trees . 4. Wildlife : The existing vegetation of the site provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 1 PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC [HEARING - JAMES W. DALPAY , R- 143-78 APRIL 11,1 , 1978 PAGE TWO 5 . ', Water: There is no surface water evident on the site. 1 6 . Land Use : The subject site is undeveloped. An existing warehouse is located west of the subject site with Cummins Diesel located along the west side of Raymond Avenue S .W. , Existing single family residence uses are located east and 'south of the subject site . > F. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : 1 The area is in a transition from single family residential , manu- facturing park , and light industrial uses . G. PUBLiIC SERVICE: 1. Water and Sewer: An existing 12 inch water main runs along Raymond Avenue S. W. and a 4 inch water main runs along South 150th Place. A Metro sewer runs ' along the alley through Block 28 in an east-west direction and an 8 inch sanitary sewer also runs along Raymond Avenue S . W. 2. Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements . 3. Transit : Metro Transit Routes 161 , 162 , and 242 operate along South Grady Way, one-half block north of the subject site. 4. S'chools : Not applicable . 5. Parks : Not applicable . H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1 . Section 4-706, R-1 , Residence Single Family. 2 . Section 4-712 , L- 1 , Light Industrial 3. Section 4-730, M-P, Manufacturing Park. I . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS : 1 . Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan, 1976, Objectives , page 5-8. 2 . Comprehensive Plan , 1965 , Land Use Report , Objective 6 , p. 18. J. IMPACTS ON NATURAL SYSTEMS : Minor. ; K. SOCIALIIMPACTS : There may be a minor impact upon the area due to transition from a residential zone to a light industrial zone. L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW. 43-21C, a Declaration of non-significance has been issued for the subject proposal . M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: . A vicinity map and site mapare attached N. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: ' 1. City of Renton Engineering Division is 1 1 �, 1 'I - l _ _ I Id e. _ __---_,�, .,,...--.�_,.—_, _ xl••r`.e•.elrua•r..i.n.•ke.n.xewa�vn•c+M+.•.-v.n�J;iw+:A§,k+ .^,� •:gR;.q'SSa.24rut w..ire:x...tlra..Y.:trer.a..,-.•ehA»„++. • PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING - JAMES W . DALPAY , R- 143-78 APRIL 11, 1978 PAGE THREE 2. City of Renton Utilities Division 3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 4. iCity of Renton Fire Department 0. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS': 1 . The proposed L-1 zoning is inconsistent with the Manufacturing Park designation of the Comprehensive Plan . However, because of the small lot sizes peculiar to this area of the Valley (The area was formerly a residential plat. ) , which create difficulties in meeting the M-P District setback standards , it has been the policy of the City Council to approve L- 1 zoning in lieu of Manufacturing Park subject to certain conditions . Such conditions have been in the form of restric- tive covenants and establish development standards which are Compatible with the M-P .zone and Valley Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives , June 1976 (Section 4-3014( B) ) . 2 . The proposed plot plan is not acceptable and, therefore , has not been specifically reviewed and approved. The proposed u,se appears to be an acceptable L- 1 use. Detailed site and development plans will be necessary as part of any building permit application . 3 . Water and sewer mains are in the area . A water main extension firom Raymond will be necessary at the time of site development. 4. Fre • access , water flow, and hydrant location will be subject to Fire Department requirements at the time of, site develop- ment. 5 . Any development of the site should include removal of the existing structure located on the site, together with provision of suitable setbacks , landscaping, and screening requirements consistent with other similar rezone approvals in the area ( i . e . , Rich O ' Brien Rezone , No . R-885-76 , Charles Divelbiss Rezone, No . R-016-77 , etc. ) and the Valley Comprehensive Plan . 6. Siince the land zone classification (G-6000) was placed on the ' site , the area has experienced a transition from single family residential uses toward more commercial and industrial uses (Section 4-3014(c ) ) . P. PLANNI'NG DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of L-1 zone based on the above analysis with restrictive covenants which will provide compatibility with the Comprehensive Plan and M-P zone classification as follows : 1 . SETBACKS Noibuildings or structures shall be permitted a located: : I a. 1 Within 30 feet of the southerly property line adjacent to S . W. 12th Street. b . Within 10 feet of all other property lines . 2 . LANDSCAPED AREAS The first 10 feet adjacent to all property lines shall be appropriately landscaped and maintained continuously in a , neat and clean manner, except for designated pedestrian and vehicular accessways . The remainder of the setback areas exclusive of the 10 foot landscape area may be utilized for off-street parking purposes as provided by the laws and ordinances of the City of Renton . Any areas not utilized . • , . , , • , . ,,,, . n...... _.. _ .........m ; ) '''•,7::\ ft...,-7,6416446:1 ==... .---7-- N . , } ... G , :.‘•,. \-,\, 1 ,•,' •-...._._ .-- - . t , •....._ . ,e , . . _ .. . ,,d -_).___ _. _ S. VV.- 7TH - -—------ - ---- •--- ._t, , I 1 1.3i[ .i.7. L _.... . . _ > . , . . , • -71,..F!..,.\.„.....„:.:•:..“:„.. ....\.:.,...,..,''':.:::z . _ _____---..:----- .. „.:.,.....,,.:„... i\\ .,.:!„:„..,„:,.., • 1 \., . II 0 .---,-- .....-- i --- - ----- - -- .finoopoic 1 1 1 _ _ _,_ F'. _• _____------ ._.,-...ii...;-jisi'' * .------ 11111111. - fl r • ___ 100 0_10 ..11. 1. .00 . 0111 eir_ • I . c, ,X ------ 7. — . -. !, , L 1 . ,R.,,a '-`k---9_i?..0--got-. .fiii0019 111fillit , II 01011-1 P' I I -1--c"---,-. •' -, • . 4 • , \,..., , . • 4 1, .- - I ••• ____, ,,._:„...._::_uv,...._-_,gr-----5 A . „ ..„mai,i' Mgt 1-1:I;11101 i ,C• g „4,i,Ip,iili... , (---,-----:-N nTh.,1- --- ..„.„.,..x-•`--"--- . low IOINI,,, pi 1 , . •4,1,0 li. ' ,...,,;------`, i " ; \\ • .1001 !.1.1'1 13i.'• A I I I r" 100 i ...1. i ' • \ . )\ . -ii.11141110 '.I Cull I i.0"1 II, 1 I DI; 911 '11011j1 $ W!IMO' i ------- : -------101 4 II '11""'---da'I'•:111 a"''''':' "Ili I . :12' ''''' PI•,--"‘ 'fill!4'...illir N,.-—__. _j_______.---!----"_., -....°!*--: 1-•,...* 0! ' lAil: FP.'if I ::....: ' --.al. q ppm.- ...,..':up 1 i' • 0000 10 ' ' ' - -0000..:-. qb.1.11 '' 7in•7. . :'"'L.'-1. ,,,--- '._.1.-_____-,:-._-- __'_ _ __________ ---- _k. : -.7.. . '::•••••,4.-:^-7'--'_ _...-1,—,"__-----,--7--- ----_—_-_:74. ,)i.__LI-.-.:-;-..-_-.,-_.,.=2_-:---'E-_-7:---:-,: 1 1' • / '. • . -;"--- - - _ -L,_._ . . • . .1,4444.44.". .. ..-.::.:...„-:.:'. ...::,Ars m -C., i - -. -- • .14,w4.L.• : . •:::;L., • • ., ...'' '' ‘, ,-- .--/ -------------- ---:-.1 --`:5::--- • " ' ,tiaal";--' . . 0-n3 EMI of. ';',::"..0, ,.::,....:,.'mu;. \,,,,-___,/1 \----:r i - 1., ..... .• ; at 17,0-0.01 ; .. !mrivm-e-iiiiti • ..41i ,v .tigr—mini.,- :/ . - _5_, ..... ....-, .., ,J, i 1 1 ',mai'41: J . i-LI:L..= • § _ffilmiii ",,,..- , , / ,,,,,.,.. , . -••, •• ; II,INN.=uni....amd --,,. 1 ‘ ) • t • 1;.irli!!-. ' .It dt , — 4,,As ME • • 1 P —• R-4 li B-I ' - ,,• ".,- 4:,•, 1;H ilwiiiii:1;_J'itdir, 2--:_1----.. , :-------;6-::.:_._1 Lt. , :-' .'-r: .._.:1,i _ _.- . i ' -G). 6(;)Ou' -"1-:ii-,--:--- -7!---:Al . 'r 41.:k:••• .'• ' wit LI I Cll' '*-- - - tiff.;;-,.- --!,:', -tt-- :.I1-- -- = -. ..--:.'_",,.. •1 91149-:‘:i'l;: G *4 1 , Li:- -.-.'."---,,-----i-1,-._--q_-.L:AIIL----_.±-1-1-Ezli.-_-_--2-41-=-----1.i----:--4:.--_---_-.1 r:---1---.:-.--1 -----.------i_ 21 . .; . 4 -L:, i ----, \ .1 r , ) ,:. : 4.,_..._ „___ „_. t_-_.'HIT: , ,,c_. ... .•, ... i .::-..--4: ., I, ,i... .. . ,r: ..-..-t.„, ,-:f--. ,:..: ,-- _ _151z-_-__?...j. __---.1• • ._1. : -40.,-_,-:::..,,,_ 0 1 I _: -. ,1 _. xi 7, __lot .4, 7 1 _, . ,W, - . L . . '..,. .:.-.1 4 - '1 _.i'':- .-.1 -:- :',,(31-• ,-- -4-1:_---=, 1 ------ A f .0.,_ -1- -11,_.. .)._ , _ .. .—.. .• _ <-•t • 1 • . .\ • . - . - --41-.=.T"'-...T.-% --V. - -1 ,'• , •-:.:-":': il'-', . -.›. '-, f:-151- ,. -2 :.____-.-4-.. ....-...: ,•,...,,_._.-, - -71-._t..;): ; , :il .:....._. cht .. , • " ..------M--1:4.24 4 I . Ii ..-"t•-i--- .11!:_,.____ -i _ , .__. _ 1-- - .6 ----- • :1,413../ MEANDER DO 710N p-A01.:1 -- . ----iiii\AL- tPl?I'+'..__ _.--11-t_. ___ . __: - . . i • 80 /9 < I 1 - , --- --- ' :j_4._,.„ -I.!_-.-_ .:7 _ 1 1_-=_----_ - _••-I---- - - i• a . . 1 • z • • -_-_,L---___J •----,=-.7______ _._ •s. 77 in B. I ti l) .' I i — • ----- 12J J I I G , ::T-. _:_'1 . ..:_.:..._ .. ...: : . i, _...._ h - -- . . . !I . • L... -I 2 74 kD . • _---- -.7.77-= 1., • - ----— --...— , , REZONE: 1 .' • JAMES W. DALPAY , APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G-6000 TO L- 1 ; File No . • R- 143-78; ' property located in vicinity of 620 S . W. 12th Street between Raymond Avenue S . W. and Seneca Avenue S. W. , 1 • • . . . . 1 . . . 1 • . 1 . . : APPLICANT JAMES W. DALPAY TOTAL AREA ±24,000 sq .. ft. . , . • 1 • i . i Via S. W. 12th Street ., PRINCIPAL ACCESS EXISTING ZONING G-6000, Single Family Residential • .'‘, • 1 . . . EXISTING USE Undeveloped , , . . PROPOSED USE Warehouse with Upholstery Shop . 1 . . COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Manufacturing Park , . • • COMMENT . , , 1 , . I . .. • 11 • I, . . . . . . . . ii. . , . . .• • . milmimmwm+ 1,•, . " . • • . • : :: I 1 14 couvr at XL. . 6v4 9)4c7."1:. '. ... 4e. .,,. V/Pl...•-• .6-8.-8------. S.t.PJI $ 'r * 1 g 0 :2 VI t3 it tti SO 4 1 CI [a, 1 in 5A.I. 405 1 2 soma . wmeepl2 6 . I qpgCA►,� Iuczoo A 5U0..014 SITE Mg1 JAMS& VJ. AAI,QaY REzame ` R-143-71 I C- -1,,oCx -to L.-I. ;i 1 i is l I 1; i I I I ROUTE SCHEDULE I I. 1 i i PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE ROUTED 3 2Z1l2' PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR: . . /Srw�GS Gi -(,Ooo •-re, L. RE ONE YZ— ( 43 -�76' ' fJ MAJOR PLAT S APPROVAL • SHORT PLAT SPECIAL PERMIT , WAIVER • i SHORELINE MANAGEMENT . ' PERMIT OR EXEMPTION . •• AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT I; WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE 2/77 . , . SIGNATURE r ' 11 OR INIT DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DENIAL DATE i BUILDIN _ �''? .- d . I.)17 TRAFFIC X � '" a 1ciA.pvt___ EN INEER • 3 43 /7. 6; I I • CHIEF GE I SSLER FI I X 3/28/78 ;. HEALTH K,a REVIEWER °S COMMENTS OR APPROVAL ' CONDITIONS : , l '-41-4A____ .....„...-e-- 3„. .. ,,.....„....„...", ... .... . i . . ,. . . . ({ -, L.):,/,,,i-a.--2,eV 0,_.19 /4- yLe,/roe, eree4 "-JO/ 1 ''i ___ ; , .. . . . . . ., . , . __ , • ... • .„ , . . •. ; . , . • 1 , • 1 ; . .. • . _ . „ , .,1 : ., . , • • ; , , ' PLEASE SIGN THE E . I .W . : - f il . i1 It . + . . .• i ; . ,, !;I , I . i t v: . i';' +..i: ,41 ,a 1! j 11 I.'I ,i. '; A,r _ ' . ..... ...� .. . .�,.,.,._,,-. i ii. . ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS • , TO :, iil Finance Department • • • Fire Department Library Department Park Department - - Police Department . • Public Works Department - Building Div. - 0 Traffic Engineering Div . • , ; Engineering Div o et Utilities Engineering Div. I FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or° his designee) i I G KL �11 __ . • SUBJECT : ; Review of ECF-_32,3-7? ' Application No . : r.•- 1y3_?;x . Action Name : JAM S2a.s -- - - GC' 4(30Q' -fb L.—I . j , . Please review the attached . . Review i;equested, by . (date) : 3 'Obi . I REVIEW BY ,OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : . Department : ' 0.2) 6; Comments : , ---72-,-, r, ---- -4,,,P-7 ;"") c-xl--0-7.-- `^' 41, . Si gnatur;e t, Di rec or or Au onzed Representative Date;; . ',j 1 REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : j I;I ; - Department ;hewi. ____.. ..... .........._..___ ___.._.__ Comments : MO ` � 111 I. j , ; _ 7e • f Signature of Director br Authorized Rep res ::ii t iti ve��4„,e...._____ a .�te .'i , - ti ii 1.• ! 1I1 • - is H. +' I ' ' . '. : , . . ; REVIE0 b'4 OTHIA CMY DEPARTMENTS : • ; • • • sr: Department : t.) .r.k... i ,• • . ;.1 Comments : • . 0 ot. 1 2,12i .1. • - .,, . . . . . . • . • •...: . . . . . . . . ,. . . , . . . • . . . , ' . . • •. . .. . . :....... . . ' I-;l-"- 3.-e -.' . . . •. SignatOre 'of Director or Authorized Representative • Date • • . , . . . . . . 1 REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : • , 'Department : FIRE DEPARTMENT ' . ,Comments : HYDRANTS TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED FIRE FLOW AND BE WITHIN 150 FEET OF STRUCTURE. • • i . •. . • : • .' . . . ' . • ,. • i: . . ...' .. . . 1 . '• . 1 • .. . . • •. •. , R. GEI SSLER. FIRE CHIEF JB 3/2Pn8 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date . ., \ . .REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : . ' . • • . ' . . • • _ . . . . Department : ' . ,.. . . - Comments : . . . . . . . . . .. L • .. . . i. • -. 1. . .1 . , • • . . . . . . . . . • . . ,. . . ' Signature of Director or \uthori zed RepresentatfV6----- Date • . ., _ ...... ...._ • . , , . __..._ . -H- . . , • ! . 1 kiEVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : . . Department : . . . . . • Comments : ' . • ;. ; . . ' . . , Si . . ' . .. , • .. . . . . ! : , , .. . ,.. . . i• . . ' ; • ; i . 1 ' , : •• il , • .,i , ..,,,.• ,. , ,,i , • i . , ,' .. ',i' :.;•: if .i.I . .1 . p: , 1 • .': 'U.::.;) . .i k .. • i ' . . p . p . ' 1 ignature efDiOcter:.or. uthorized Representative ,...., , .. , , :, ,,., I i , ,,• ! . • ;.;,.. .- .:.. .:, !;.,:i! ‘;., ; :,.;, , ! . .,:. . ', . .„ ,.:',. .!1.. .:, . I j • . 1, ;:: . i . . ... . . ,...plve. . • , . ti . . ,1!;1' •! • . , • ,. . . • ';;::, ',.•.;• :' '' .,:,!4'1•Ii•I't, . • • • ' 1 . i3i: . 1 • 1 • PROPOSED/FINAL •LARATION OF SIGNIFICANCESN-SIGNIFICANCE Application No . R-143-78 ❑ PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No. ECF-323-78 0 FINAL Declaration • Description of proposal Rezone from G-6000 to L-1 , Light Industry - . • • Proponent JAMES W. DALPAY • Locationiof Proposal Vicinity of 620 S. W. 12th Street Lead Agency City of Renton Planning Department This proposal has been determined to ❑ have El not have a -- --:----_— significant adverse impact .'upon the environment . An EIS 0 is ❑ x is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was ' made after review by the lead agency of a completed' environmental • checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . non . Reasons flor declaration. of environmental/ significance : This declaration is based upon provision of site developmental • standards that are consistent •with the Green River Valley Compre- hensive Plan and compatible with the Manufacturing Park concept. • • • • • • Measures , , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance :• - I • • I • Responsible Official Gordon Y. Ericksen • Title Pliannine Dire ' or 1:4, Date . April 4, 1978 . Signature • City of Renton • Planning Department . • • • Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ss. • • NOTICE,OF- .' PUBLIC HEARING•' •': .`= RENTON LAND USE. Ma rZ a r e t Ha rb a ug h being first duly sworn on •: •HEARING EXAMINER' • I :;RENTON;,WASHINGTON• A .PUBLIC' HEARING oath,deposesandsaysthatShe is the Chief Clerk of WILL:BE HELD?BY`THE` • THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE,a newspaper published four(4) HE RING • LAN•N USE times a weeks That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and :HIS. EXAMINER has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred S.REGULAR MEETINGG to,printed and published in the English language continually as a news- IN- COUNCIL CHAM-:: paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, •BERS;::CITY•=HALL,;,RE-;- • and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained NTON;WASHINGTON ON at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Renton. . APq!!: 1?.=l9'3;AT 9 00•` - Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the A. TO CONSIDER THE Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, FOLLOWING PETITIONS: . • i:',1:~JAMES•.W:•DALPAY,::: ' g Notice of Public APPLICATION FOR RE= - Washington.That the annexed is a - ZONE FROM G-6000 • • sTOL-1;property located-``-s Hearing In vicinity of_620. S.w.-1 "••12th•Street• betwee n- Raymond Aventie•S.W. f. as it was published in regular issues(and '- end•. Seneca•Avenu e: not in supplement form of said newspaper)once each issue for a period `' 2.1 J 4 2. JAMES'W:'DALPAY� e.. -APPLICATION FOR RE= 4, '+;i..ZONE FROM..G-7200:.: ; of I 1 consecutive issues,commencing on the "^'µ:TO •B-I;property located' I `..on-Union'Avenue,N.E •.- between N.E.12th Street,; t ....31.... .ax'.C.h. ,19..78...,and ending the ^'-.':'and: N.E. •Sunset .a. ': Boulevard:-.4.:- ~ ` •r,• Legal descriptions.of 'I ::pticatiorts .rioted'above': day of ,19 ,both dates ; on'file .in the. Renton ,: inclusive, and''that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- r. Planning Department.: scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee - F:: 'ALL_INTERESTED:PER-i.r . • •;SONS TOSAID PETITIONS,;s :•ARE INVITED TO BE PRE .. charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $. •?,which SENT...AT_ THE•PUBLIC has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the ;'HEARING ON APRIL 11, first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent • insertion. 1978 AT 9:00 A.M.TO EX- :PRESS.THEIR OPINIONS. IF 'A I ;'.-.,GORDON Y.ERICKSEN:s .I. •t( (f( 1(,• ,(`�,C k. RENTON PLANNING••1 �f �• ' ...,-,-:_- DIRECTOR-1 `'-'>=Published in The Renton Chief Clerk '•f Record-Chronicle March 31;-.: . .c 1978.R4863 • ..y Subscribed and sworn to before me this 31 day of I • March t , 19 78 Notary Public in nd for the State of Washing on,• •F/1, residing at Kent,King Co ty. �� ^K{CE�� 6 1 ir- L —Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June i APR 5 19789th, 1955. i —Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, c ...............1 adopted by the newspapers of the State. -92'PA �_ • f�G DEP AR�+ ,---7.1 alb CITY OF RENTON • V REZONE APPLICATION NO 14 1918 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ��77 LAND USE HEARING APPLICATION NO. a-14,5- /� EXAMINER 'S ACTION \'\13 `9 ,APPLICATION FEE $ /00,60 APPEAL FILED \IIVG DS% RECEIPT NO. 2 f CITY COUNCIL ACTION • FILING DATE17D4/2A4 /4, /J 7k ORDINANCE NO. AND DATE HEARING DATE APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 10 : 1 . Name JAMES W. DALPA>- Phone 226-6363 • Address _EA_0- BOX 2416 RENTON, WASHI NGTON g8A5c 3. Property petitioned for rezoning is located on 620 Southwest 12th Straat between RPyninnd Ava S W, and 'genera Ave_ t 4 . Square footage or acreage of property 24.000 5 . Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet) Lots 21 through 28 inclusive in Block 28 of C.D. Hillmans Eerlinelton Garden Addition to the City of Seattle, Division No. 1 , as per plat recorded In Volume 17 of Plats, page 74, records of King County. 6 . Existing Zoning c-6000 Zoning Requested 1.1 NOTE TO APPLICANT : The following factors are considered in reclassifying \ property. Evidence or additional information to substantiate your request may be attached to this sheet. (See Application Procedure Sheet for specific requirements . ) Submit this form in duplicate. 7. Proposed use of site Warehouse with upho'stery shop Ics 1\ 8. List the measures to be taken to reduce impact on the surrounding area.\\ \ complying with Renton building codes, no negative factors involved. \ '\ . ' . i (*> - PERI/b/vi:;\ ' AFFIDAVIT • . ' 1 .4 4 ic"-- -• ) . t I , , being duly sworn, de. la-r-.e ,that I - . am the o iRmagt Wdf®Tt1`ieA property involved' in this application and, that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information .herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best, of my knowledge and belief. . Subscribed and sworn before me this d' I day of /714WCf/ , 19 7f , Notary Public, in and for the State of , ' Washington, residing at jP c:11V • . ___ Name o Notary Public) . Si ature o Owner • 4;,,l — (FLY-5-;- ;G /�', �-I • A 0 r�Ox 9436 (Address) (hddress) 'Fy r:- /I&4/ - . "`�:.°`r‘ss10ry Ft < ` "= REJITON, WASHI NGTON 98055 o tIOTARY p'( (City) (State) r fi-. J1.q\\,� 22�6�f�3 • 17ASIk' ,-•-. • (Telephone) _ . (FOR . OFFICE USE ONLY) • CERTIFICATION This ' is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning' Department ' governing the filing of such application . . Date Received , 19 By: Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 4 �-a. U -2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : (6-249 CiP fi ' ST 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : 9. List of all permits, licenses or government approvals required for the proposal (federal , state and local --including rezones) : 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal ? If yes , explain: 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: ge 7 -2-a. P Ay,'" CCi/r II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) (1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? ✓ YES TOTE NO (b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over- ✓ covering of the soil? YES MAYBE NO (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief r/ features? YES MAYBE .N- (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? YES MAYBE NO (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , ,i either on or off the site? Y S MAYBE NO (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation , deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? YEK— MAYBE TO-- Explanation: !/ a Pw Gft/y� fn �'F CITY OF RENTON/ WASHINGTON � .. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM � � 1.4 11c31 - A 1 44, t FOR OFFICE USE ONLY / ///� Application No. f j`� - 7 Environmental Checklist No. ,e,c- 2& 'g PROPOSED, date: FINAL, date: Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance DDeclaration of Non-Significance Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State - of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent JADES w. DALPAY 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: P.O. BOX 2436 (4033 N.E. SUNSET BLVD. RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 3. Date Checklist submitted NINON 3/L2/78 4. Agency requiring Checklist RENTON PLANNING DEPT. 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: NO 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : • /1-c 0.-.-, C h o..,. . CAr 4 ' O O 'f® -4- - (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? YES MAYBE NO (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or o// endangered species of fauna? YES MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement y/ of fauna? YES MAYBE NO (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • • (7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or ✓ • glare? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the •alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? • YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? YES M-BY-BE NO (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? o YES RATTE NO Explanation: • . (10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of ,an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? YES MMAYBE NO Explanation: (11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? YES— MAYBE NO Explanation: __� -3- . (2) Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? YET— MAYBE NO (b) The creation of objectionable odors? YES MAYBE ITIE— (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, / or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (3) Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? YES MAYBE NO (b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? • YES MAYBE NO (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? YES MAYBE NO (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? YES MAYBE NO (e) Discharge into surface waters , or in• any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to r/ temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? YES MAYBE N� (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? YES MAYBE NO (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES RATITE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through l` direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, j// phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? YES MAYBE NO (i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? YET— MATTE KU— Explanation: (4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any • / species of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass , crops , microflora and aquatic plants)? TES MAYBE P 0� (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique , rare or endangered species of flora? V'ES MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? MAYBE NO/ (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? YET— MAYBE NO Explanation: -6- (d) Sewer or septic tanks? YES MAYBE NO/ (e) Storm water drainage? YES MAYBE NO (f) Solid waste and disposal? �/ YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of / any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? '7-E1- MAYBE NO Explanation: (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object -or building? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: _^ III . SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue "ance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or wi ful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: 4114t7)41Ad— si 'ned (name printed) City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 J if -5- (12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or / create a demand for additional housing? /' YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? YES MAYBE NO (b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking? YES MAYBE NO / (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? ` YET— MAYBE NO (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? YES MAYBE NB/ (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? YES MAYBE NO (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : (a) Fire protection? S YES MAYBE NO/ - (b) Police protection? YES ffiTTIff NO / (c) Schools? // YES MAYBE NO (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? YES MAYBE NC./ (e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? YES MAYBE NO , (f) Other governmental services? v/ YES RPM-E NO Explanation: (15) Energy. Will the proposal result in : (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? v YES MAYBE NO (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require w/ the development of new sources of energy? YET— MAYBE WU— Explanation: (16) Utilities. Will the proposal . result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities : (a) Power or natural gas? YES MAYBE NO (b) Communications systems? YES MAYBE NO / (c) Water? LI YES MAYBE NO 4 pF R�,j m0 THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 • S 43. CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT A 43- 235-2550 O,Q-fO SE001ze, • March 28, 1978 James W. Dalpay P. O. Box 2436 • Renton , Washington 98055 RE : NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE _ AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G-6000 TO L-1 ; File No. R- 143-78; property located in vicinity of 620 S. W. 12th Street between • Raymond Avenue S. W. and Seneca Avenue S . W. Dear Mr. Dalpay: The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on March 23 , 1978 . A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for April 11 , 1978 at 9 : 00 a . m. , Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present . All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing . If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department , 235-2550. Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen Planning Director • By Michael L Smith Associate Planner wr A - I NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ' RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON , WASHINGTON, ON APRIL 11 ,• 19 78 , AT 9 :00 A. M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: 1. JAMES W. DALPAY , APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G-6000 TO L- 1 ; property located in vicinity of 620 S. W. 12th Street between Raymond Ave- nue S. W. and Seneca Avenue S. W. 2 . JAMES W. DALPAY , APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G-7200 TO B- 1 ; property located on Union Avenue N. E. between N. E. 12th Street and N . E. Sunset Boulevard. Legal descriptions of applications noted above on file in the Renton Planning Department. a . . 1 ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT 'AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON APRIL 11 , 1978 AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. GORDON Y. ERICKSEN PUBLISHED March 31 , 1978 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I , STEVE MUNSON , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES °` . OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ' ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to beforeame, a Notary Public, \! on the Z$ day of Ravd, , 19 `1 ;. SIGNED )44,31t7v.e1/1L,444-pl PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING APRIL 11 , 1978 I APPLICANT,: JAMES W. DALPAY FILE NO . : R-143-78, REZONE A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant requests the approval of an 8-lot proposed rezone from G-6000 to L-1 to allow the property to be used for a ware- houselwith upholstery shop. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1 . Owner of Record : JAMES W. DALPAY 2 . Applicant: JAMES W. DALPAY 3 . Location : Vicinity of 620 S. W. 12th Street. 4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5 . Size of Property : ±24 ,000 square feet 6 . Access : Via S. W. 12th Street. 7 . Existing Zoning : G-6000 , General Classification District, Single Family Residen- tial , minimum lot size 6 ,000 square feet . 8. Existing Zoning in the Area : G-6000 , Single Family Residence District ; L-1 , Light Industrial ; M-P , Manufacturing Park. I 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Manufacturing Park 10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date .,;, Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle and• I ; posted in 3 places on or near the site as required by Cityl ordinance. i I C. PURPOSE OF REQUEST : 1 To allow rezone of the subject site for future development of light industrial and commercial uses . D. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: i The site was annexed into the City by Ordinance No. 1745 ( 1959 ) ; Amendment Ordinance No . 1764 ( 1959) , and Amendment Ordinance No. 1928 ( 1961 ) . E. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND : 1. Topography : The site is generally level with a slight northerly rise at the north boundary. y 2 . Soils : Urban Land (Ur) ; erosion hazard is slight to moderate. 0 3. Vegetation : The site is covered by a dense mixture of grass , short to medium shrubs and some tall deciduous trees . 4. Wildlife : The existing vegetation of. the site provides suitable ,: habitat for birds and small mammals . • PLANNINIG DEPARTMENT PRELIMIiNARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC SHEARING - JAMES W. DALPAY , R- 143-78 APRIL 11 , 1978 PAGE TWO 5 . 1Water: There is no surface water evident on the site. 6 . Land Use : The subject site is undeveloped. An existing lwarehouse is located west of the subject site with Cummins Diesel located along the west side of Raymond Avenue S . W. 'Existing single family residence uses are located east and (south of the subject site . F. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The area is in a transition from single family residential , manu- facturing park , and light industrial uses . G. PUBLIC SERVICE: 1. Water and Sewer: An existing 12 inch water main runs along Raymond Avenue S. W. and a 4 inch water main runs along South 150th Place. A Metro sewer runs along the alley through ' Block 28 in an east-west direction and an 8 inch sanitary sewer also runs along Raymond Avenue S. W. 2. Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements . . 3. Tiransit: Metro Transit Routes 161 , 162 , and 242 operate ' along South Grady Way, one-half block north of the subject site . 4. Schools : Not applicable . 5. Parks : Not applicable. H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1 . Section 4-706, R- 1 , Residence Single Family. 2 . Section 4-712 , L-1 , Light Industrial 3. Section 4-730, M-P, Manufacturing Park. I . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS: 1 . Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan, 1976 , Objectives , page 5-8. 2 . Comprehensive Plan , 1965, Land Use Report, Objective 6 , p. 18. J. IMPACTS ON NATURAL SYSTEMS : Minor. K. SOCIALIMPACTS : There may be a minor impact upon the area due to transition from a residential zone to a light industrial zone. L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the City of Renton' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Einvironmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended, RCW. 43-21C , a Declaration of non-significance has been issued for the subject proposal . M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION : A vicinity map and site map are attached. N. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1. City', of Renton Engineering Division i! PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING - JAMES W . DALPAY , R- 143-78 APRIL 11 , 1978 PAGE THREE 2. , City of Renton Utilities Division 3. 'City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 4. !!City of Renton Fire Department 0. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS': 1 . The proposed L-1 zoning is inconsistent with the Manufacturing Park designation of the Comprehensive Plan. However, because iof the small lot sizes peculiar to this area of the Valley '(The area was formerly a residential plat. ) , which create difficulties in meeting the M-P District setback standards , it has been the policy of the City Council to approve L- 1 zoning in lieu of Manufacturing Park subject to certain Conditions . Such conditions have been in the form of restric- tive covenants and establish development standards whichrare 'compatible with the M-P zone and Valley Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives , June 1976 (Section 4-3014( B) ) . 2 . The proposed plot plan is not acceptable and, therefore , has . not been specifically reviewed and approved. The proposed use appears to be an acceptable L-1 use. Detailed site and development plans will be necessary as part of any building permit application . 3 . Water and sewer mains are in the area . A water main extension • from Raymond will be necessary at the time of site development. 4. Fire access , water flow, and hydrant location will be subject t'o Fire Department requirements at the time of, site develop- ment. 5 . Any development of the site should include removal of tpe existing structure located on the site, together with provision of suitable setbacks , landscaping, and screening requirements consistent with other similar rezone approvals in the area ( i . e . , Rich O' Brien Rezone , No . R-885-76, Charles Divelbiss Rezone , No. R-016-77 , etc. ) and the Valley Comprehensive Plan . 6. Since the land zone classification (G-6000) was placed on the site , the area has experienced a transition from single family re4sidential uses toward more commercial and industrial uses (Section 4-3014(c) ) . P. PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION : Recommend approval of L-1 zone based on the above analysis with restrictive covenants Which will provide compatibility with the Comprehensive Plan and M-P zone classification as follows : 1 . SETBACKS No ! buildings or structures shall be permitted as located: a. , Within 30 feet of the southerly property line adjacent to S. W. 12th Street. b. Within 10 feet of all other property lines . .;" 2 . LANDSCAPED AREAS Thet first 10 feet adjacent to all property lines shall be appiropriately landscaped and maintained continuously in a neat and clean manner, except for designated pedestrian and vehicular accessways . The remainder of the setback areas exclusive of the 10 foot landscape area may be utilized for : off-street parking purposes as provided by the laws and ordinances of the' City of Renton . Any areas not utilized 1 r I ,' PLANNING DEPARTMENT i PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER � ., PUBLIC HEARING - JAMES W. DALPAY , R- 143-78 APRIL 11 , 1978 PAGE FOUR ! for parking, circulation , or structures shall be appropriately ! landscaped. Detailed landscape plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Renton Planning Department. I I. 3 . ! OUTSIDE STORAGE AREAS : 1The outside storage of materials , construction equipment , and ! containers shall be permitted within the buildable area of ' the subject property, provided such storage area is screened [ from all adjacent property lines by a wall or view obscuring ! fence not less than 8 feet nor more than 10 feet in height, ! together with a minimum 5 foot landscape strip suitable for ! screening purposes . . Such screening and landscaping shall be approved by the Renton Planning Department and continously be maintained in a neat and clean manner. • 11 li ti -i ' I ; It r I I . . I r ;1 j. .11 . • ' . . WRIMIMIIIMPIONIP 111111•111611 ,• \ • .. --'' I -r- --"' / ,-- i / % A ' ' 1 - ..- S. W--- 7Th__--___-__ ____ _---..:--------=-.-7-7-------1 r / ..------, . .......__... , B 611=1 I '/ I 1, ( \ ----- •.1- . , ....... ....,... — ., .. . •i • a/ *.l. p ,,...:..v,......,,..., ........z . •,:::::,,,,,,.. .v..r."::...:• . L.—1 • 0 I - ! . ,,iir ..-- - ....... _______--------1457°. ,______ ow, -------. -•- i 11111110111' ';; ' •,-.•• - ------- s<1114„1 . ,oil 1 .-------- .3ili' 1 1 . ! i , , L . .c\S-- ON - 01101i 1 cce-1 -1=-9_ --t---1- . .- 4400 . . 0.- ,... _ - • -00531-0,1;_s-— , , •W i1118 ,I- li 1 I L. '7 -,..0;-r: ,iiilior;' • -__,..-tipjl__-. --- 5. %1111114 , r wt. ,_.--4-!-',N,....... 11 ---- - :........ L..... . . ..-01 . _ di„,d / 4 1 1...%int ..r.,:.111 •-,fil hum 4.0■111, ' ) •-:,..._ _ ___L__--,--r..g--- -:'"7------..--,' '010111P , .lill - '6.111!' • 1 111 il 14 i iiii0,11W 11111L=-1: ., •11160011 Xtr•- •" I-1. __,.„.":-. ._____:-_-- -.1-1--_-.-,E_-,-.- -- . ill '1‘ 4-,4-6101:.[:.1)04....i 9 Ili•---'X-. 4 ,rn•-'1-.!. .• =-_-__,-„,-.,-_ ---- .‘ to Op ..... , 1. -:.,..f . .. at : .- r. ....,- • . • ill.. A - ------,.. .4,-. "- --- -:-.:::-:::_--.:r.__:.____.-- 4. 4 , . .•- - - ,• -- .. ...., - • ' • "' • liNr- . , •,, .''' •e. . -,,,,f'^.. , .... . . / 1::,-)-:--,---%"------''------------7---;'--- Igo n"I','. )0!!1°I i .-.:1Lr__C-. •7,.:i... '..:" ,,.....,,?Trijilatil. v't4 CM_.._._4.1 i'i:1-:. • '.• ::-",: , ,.. - <,/,,_,-.--,,,,-- _ • 1 , -, =• I. 5--'-1,„-- ---:_.---1-, it 'i El ::.ale..1 '. 114a...ei........ilipit 114 .MM.rirr.:11"..:::•••••:i-: .:1 , tN.• I " ' ° '.1 • • • • /Ea t, 1 ..... . I , .11111111105 -. 11j+. ''' I 7 • .' ' 411 i 1 ji _ 2,2_ • 1! 3_ -, . -,• ' •.. - ..' . ' '. ' -- 1-- r -}----.-'°':-- :_--1 r- ri•--v:• ,---::::::- --' ••1 '!; :ii'ii" ';-•-- -- --' '---.6:---1 1----- - ' --L.4.11 R.4 i B-I , aa - -,- ''L: 4,.,,, „:., __,_„- 1,,_____,-.- _,4.:_ 7._ _ • , , . -=lt-1-- -;4 -- - ---' In. _. ... . --:- _-.-._, _...._ , G6 . A;- . . -----. --- N \ .f411... -i.;:f i- oi•-•.-'.--'..II-•__F-.1 r-•. ::yx •- -,;,-t, .,.•.-•__ ..:_i_,,,....1- .: .,_- -,7:,-".•!Ii• 1 G 'Ilk . 1 , t::-..r•-•••:1"-•-•.1..-. T t- 5_,', -•-_2,• _•:. .. .---- -::_- ,:,, ---.:1-_-___:: _ 40- 0 6 . 1 'L 1 LI -1:i /(---- \ .4_.-- 0- - •. --1 ,----- ---1,.-T.....7 . -.1 ut- - 1- --L ,- + _:1 i . _,. 1 , • -. 4 ,,---- ,I.--.___-At-j.k...,;-:--t-,--iti ...---r. .,:i'ill:c,,,,L,-i---_1-.0,- .i. .: loi•._;:.-..i.„ 'VI i•-• .___.••. _ ,--, . . 1: __ .- = ,c, - , : , - - ' --1-7_1 -.10' •-; -- 114-- " -, ' ' • -::1 V --•11.2' i ' '- ' - ' :- --4- -- -.J,- ;-. -,,,,,i1. .-:', 1-..-:-_-. 1:. 4 f . . -,, _ - . ._-.-3<'__ li : - --:- : •:.J 1-7 -r;c;:- '- --'"H- T'-- ' ::• - -7:-\-1 • • i•- J,'-'1-— 4, • .•'':---2- ---•-' ;••-• , - -;lo, -, -L'<:- : •_, _.. . _____ , CY • • —A -.-*Al, -_...', .•,.. -' L - :••.-' ?•,:•,,•:.4 1_1,4;__ .:._ ._;>;_ -- - H - _-.T- T--',.i-----I.---"-i--: -1 - : r,-, - .1 9\,`, - . . - \ --- -- .NM"' MEANDER DO T1ON CL-A5 ll-i - \• -_ - _ -••- 5T-1 i-----)1 fr----- r-INI" . -ar-E- 190 • 1.1 (...) 0 ,, a ,1) :IL_it ..I: F.1 . ...! ..___- 'L---14-1- rTi. it_ ,8 e2 . I. - --a . l' • 1 L---:---f---- F-- _ , z , Lo B.. 1 .,, , 'E 411; _H r ii __.11 16 D 1 G • . ; "7(.. ----- • (-.2 I • -- 75 = -,_ • < . _ _. 74 t, - - - --- ----- . — 2 . T \ - T- - --_-_-...-.:_4_-=- =7_ L.-1 75 0 1: ,,,,-' MN lablit .... — \---fr-I -----119r -- .....____.V.' __._ 0 \ ,...,_ _.2 7 - I -. - ---•. . • . _,2 . • . , I REZONE: , . i JAMES W. DALPAY , APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G-6000 TO L-1 ; File No . • R- 143-78; property located in vicinity of 620 S . W. 12th Street between ' Raymond Avenue S . W. and Seneca Avenue S. W. . . • . . '• . APPLICANT JAMES W. DALPAY TOTAL AREA ±24 ,000 scr. ft. i . • .PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via S. W. 12th Street . .• G-6000, Single Family Residential EXISTING ZONING • . . - EXISTING USE . Undeveloped . , PROPOSED USE Warehouse with Upholstery Shop . . • • COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Manufacturing Park . • COMMENTS 1, — • . . . . . — . . . • • •• I . .. .• ., :,• . . . . • ;, • • 1'.. _ . !;. , • •. .. • . . • • , ii. , .. . ammon 1;: ... . -, . . ,.,. . • l' . : : I • . , • (t • .. , ' i VAteu se,,i 4trb 114 . , . , % s•IPVief RA*Li m . . ' • , . . , - 10: idlt ' ' 6V*, .%° a • ,i- , . , -..% • • & 4 . ''' Vt. - 41 . • , 1..., cg.3 s4, . . , s•s•51.0 0hll " "J ...,u . 0 4Per• - , I „ . ..:( 5 al, 405 . ....................„.„,„,„,..„ , .._._.-----------------------b„ ,,_ . 1 . , .. ,. 9 . . Lome:n .• , 4: ‘IV %VII 461.• i • , • , f , • , , • -, ... . ._..•• • . , . U. '505.0.,Cr SaS Ma . , . . . , . , . • • iivrrhvALiPpe , gEzakm .4P R-145-7k i *- eV' Le i , 'I , . . , , • . , . , . . . , . . . . .• , . , I , . . .. 1 .. .. • • . , I , • . sl, i . ..• • , - „ . IF, : 7-- .., _ -,, ROUTE SCHEDULE , • . . . • •PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE ROUTED . • • • . . . • • PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR: ra . CI -G000 -ro 1,-I RE ONE 62.- 143 -76 MAJOR PLAT .. APPROVAL ---!-- SHORT PLAT . . SPECIAL PERMIT , WAIVER •, , • . SHORELINE MANAGEMENT •• •J .• • . PERMIT OR EXEMPTION •" . • . . „ . • • -; AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT ...y __: 't WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE 24 -77 .. • rr • SIGNATURE . • • OR . • ,i. INIT DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DENIAL DATE ;! ....- 1., H) BUILDIN ---3‘.--7v 3-az.-•--',1>, • .11 • I-)17 TRAFFIC . X -. . • ,.,..1: __ C=4t067sot,_, EN INEER ' ' „..,, CH I EF GEO ESLER FI •• . • .1 X • 3/28/78 t'k i • HEALTH • .. • . . .. ., ., . . , 411JMINIIII° . , .. , • \ •. , REVIEWER 'S COMMENTS OR APPROVAL ' CONDITIONS : • • • . :. 1 1 • . ibt- 651- . • • , . . , ' .. . • • ;I. . . . 1 . . . ., . .. . , . • - :. I i . , • ' . i '• • , i . . . : • . . . • ' • . I • .... , . . . • . ' . ' , I PLEASE SIGN THE E . I .M . : . . . . • . . . ',,,f. ,_, • . • • .\, 1 ;,• . • '‘. • --:•,':, .,' . . . . :,', . , • . . . .• • . . • . . . . . . , _. . . • - • • : • • , , ;• .. . . .. , ,, • . .. -. • . i . , -,.. ' . ' - 1 , -• , : - .. .; 7 : • :,; k' ' , • • • . • • . • . . . , . . . . . • , ,, . ,.. . . .. 1 • • :,1; . • . . .. • ,,..... , , • r,I. - • . • . : . . . i:, • . .- ' . i . 1 • • ',11 •.• .. ,., . - • , ... . i , . ' . , , ,:,J :'. • i ;; , - :;',`, .:.,,,, 1 • , - . - .•: , . , •-F.' , , , , ,, . • A , ! :,..i.,,C i - - T— .7_7•74." — o _..,,.�,.. ,. •,ir. .,........nq,r�s y i i = ROUT NG FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS l - TO : j Finance Department 10 Fire Department • � • '! Q Library Department . 0 Park Department Police Department ' . 0 Public Works Department i - i t' Building Div. 0 Traffic Engineering Div. ' 'Engineering Div: A Utilities Engineering Div. • FROM : Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee) l c. -tL_ l � .• _ _ SUBJECT : Review • of ECF- 3Z3-7g Application No . : r.- ly•3-7x . . Action Name ._ J,Awl S7 - Gf'.- Coc cL:t L-1 •Please review the attached . . Review �;equested by (date) : 3 14 7 ' REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : . • P i• Department : Comments : i; • i, • f t , • / /I .. , ' q Signature e, Director or Au orized Representative Da eta et ;, REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : • . Department . W_--. 3!hewi, -0. -_._ __ ' - 1 Comments . N0 ; • • •„, • • • I ,24-vve ---- . . • , .„34,0,f, Signature of Di rector or Authorized Repres :nn•i:ati ve ate • • l• i,- 7G •: (OVER ) 41 REVILO Eli OTHEk CllY DEPARTMENTS : • , . . • . . • Department :_ p-ri, , vii: '.:. . • . ' Comments : rt• 90, c 4•-•%A.i - i/4,, r ;;di i.,.,. 1..) .„/..i• A 0—i iStLil 4)-/ Oot-• 1 2,ri it .. , . . •. , ., . •, • . • . . . . • . • . . . • . . • • • • . • • , . . , . . .. . . • • 1r-- 3-el /if- • , . • , Signature 'of Director or Authorized Representative • Date . . .' . . . . , ... . ,, . ...—._ REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : • , '• . - I Department : F I RE DEPARTMENT ' _. Comments : HYDRANTS TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED FIRE FLOW AND BE WITHIN- 150 FEET OF STRUCTURE. i . • • . I.. . ,1 • . . .. . .. • . , . • . " • .. i:... • •. . . ; .: ; , . . • • ' i . . • R. GE!SSLER, FIRE CHIEF JB 3/28/78 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date L ! , , \ iP REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : • ' '' . • , . : !. Department : 1 i 1 ' Comments : • . . . . . . . .. t . . . , • • i• 1 . „ HI • . ., • . . ., . .1 il . . ,i • ! • 1 • . i ! • i I 1 •, . Signature of Director or Authorized Representativ Date 6 , . i hH . ,.... . ' Ll i'-.VIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS . • 1 ' Department : . • ,. 1 . 1 i ' [ • i Comments : ; . ! I • . . . • . . ! • , 1 • ' . 1 . . , . 1 . . . . il , 1 • . • 1! 11. . . 1 'Signature 'of DirectorHorluthorized Representative Dat,i , .-. , • : i 1;,i. - . :.. .., :• •': JY•;;, • . c • , . .. , :. .• . . : . ' HIH "• :' ,i'4 ' * • . ' I . • . • PROPOSED/FINAL LARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/ ,, 1-SIGNIFICANCE Application No . R-143-78 ❑ PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-323-78 EX FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Rezone from G-6000 to L-1 , Light Industry Proponent ; JAMES W. DALPAY Location Of Proposal Vicinity of 620 S . W. 12th Street Lead Agency City of Renton Planning Department This proposal has been determined to ❑ have x® not have a -- - • - significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS ❑ is is notrequired under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was ma-de a after; review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist 'and other information on file with the lead agency. non . Reasons fOr declaration, of environmental/ significance : This declaration is based upon provision of site developmental standards that are consistent with the Green River Valley Compre hensivelPlan and compatible with the Manufacturing Park concept. Measures , If any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official Gordon Y. Ericksen Title Plannin• Dire • or / Date April 4 , 1978 Signature //Ge:lbA , City of Renton ? — Planning Department ROUTE SCHEDULE PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE ROUTED ' Z4-7/ PLEASE REVIEW THIS pPPLICATION FOR: . /Aim 6s �a l' 6/ -G 000 -ro L.-1 RE ONE a- 143 -7 �J MAJOR PLAT S APPROVAL SHORT PLAT SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT OR EXEMPTION j AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT ! WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE' 74 -77 SIGNATURE ' OR INIT DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DENIAL DATE ,} BUILDIN _ •k 3'?7r d TRAFFIC • . X 3 -c97-' � ��jv EN INEERI , • 3 I°3 CHIEF GEISSLER FI d X 3/28/78 HEALTH «. '`=1 errs A..__ 3- 7- i r`. REVIEWER 'S COMMENTS OR APPROVAL . CONDITIONS : ' I' 67--- ,/, ....-sa-t.)0.--19 YL.,27-0E. rs-ee4 . "-AWL- . a' • PLEASE SIGN THE E . I ..W . : I, . . . . • t f , • • ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO : Finance Department Fire Department Library Department ' Park Department Police Department • ' Public Works Department 2 Building Div. CTraffic Engineering Div .- Engineering Div . 0/Utilities Engineering Div. FROM : Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee ) . SUBJECT : Review of ECF-' 3z,3'_7R Application No . : 12..- 1'13 -7X Action Name : j 4,fe� �a L-0 Please review the attached . Review requested by (date) :411 . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : ' OLO � Comments : , • • Si gnature Director or Au on zed Representative Date . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : ww' !/'a e - Comments : P 0 33 L3 .." Signature of Director or Authorized Repr esc:n tati ve • ate • • • 6 - 16 (0l'(: n' ) 6 ,- I REVIEW 1i r' OTHER ( 11 YDEPARTMENTS : . . Department : a T-►L , .1. i, w.• • Comments : 14 1�•; L..•:1 l.a.f i .'1 ,S O•�, ."9 in C L. • Signature of Director or Authorized Representative . , Date • REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : . Department : FIRE DEPARTMENT , Comments : HYDRANTS TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED FIRE FLOW AND BE WITHIN 150 FEET OF STRUCTURE. d • R. GEISSLER9 FIRE CHIEF JB 5/28/78 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date, ' REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : fiI Department :. _ ' Comments : . ]1 . Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date .� <iEVI EW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : - Department : • Comments : . j ,! Signature of Director or 'lluthori zecl Representa': i vc� Vt:77-i j; j . I