Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA78-179
i (7 RF�;�� I: v RFC- b n I 1 MAY 2i9 i I I o I I t' -0 I ' �i1', ,act., I I \��,,`� Pp I I I I I � I I f `- N L-- -V TH.- - li -- SI- - --preimisemiumia•Huw .- I I I I I 1 - 1 ‘' I I OM k'' . I I t I I I1 ' _---I I I I I - I I o ,4 A'r •I r I I n I I % .r I EN S v ei yE f T ivaie),0 4 I 1 • I I I X .;;rA e.A /;,,9,"1 I I - L 1 I /S J'/.' . K 1 I A-4r AiV r.E: v I I I 21 I I £,VT(y" ,f x. lin it I ' I I I - I ..t I MIS II C.� LA L ,vg I I A E i.z v,f4 #',r r 4N 7 4 S 152 .,- ,0 .%• **lit 9 `, itAe �� l04* I I > 48 11K7".• ��1 I it I 47 4' 45 44 45 5' 9 �S fL� ifiltiltt %, % . Sp a '2 I I2 3 4 S � 7 ® � °riitiSTA . 1 Zj l 0 I I ] I 2 38 . ®� i{. I I 5 �r®®A ` 3 ,A ► I : 2 3 r� 9 s� 102- I II �I 4• �0 \4L I I 6 7 8 9 lc, I I • 11111+I•- 4 l / / // / // / i // / / / H 3c /./ i 2.7 : ti .S'' 7i. ;v i��'�`f%' - .rr,.L - -f - �,1 • 2I' • it 1 1I "1 •r •i.rn ,� -!� ! �' lam • - `. '.� � ' r. 11.1 '� '{r _ CITY OF�"'•:''RENTON,' "WASHINGTON' ' a :.`ORDII�P;NCE;�NO'. 3264 f. • , •\• • ,t_' AN I;ORD`INANCE'`OF' CTTY ,OF RENTON;:' WASHINGTON • ' CHANGING THE Z`ONINCLASSIFICATION OF: CERTAIN'', PROPERTIES .WITHIN-r;THE .CITY OF RENTON FROM '' GENERAL CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT ' (G) TO TRAILER PARK' (T) (R-179-78 ) WHEREAS,.under'.Chapter .7.', Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance '-No:' '1;6'28 :known` as, the "Code of General, Ordinances. • of the City of Renton" , as,. amended ' and 'the •maps and reports_; ` adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been; zoned:as General Classfication District (G) ; and ; WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has, been filed with; the'=Planning Department• on or about May 30, 1978. which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing_ having .been"held, -thereon on or about' June 27 , 1978 , and said matter:'=having been duly considered> by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request being in 'conformity with the City ' s Comprehensive .Plan,,. as amended,' 'and ''the City Council having duly considered all matters, relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard-appearing -in support thereof o in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCI,LOF' THE CITY' OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:. SECTION I: The following described' property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Trailer Park (T) as hereinbelow specified; subject to the findings, conclusions 'and decision dated October 12 , 1978 of the City' s Hearing Examiner;the Planning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: -1- • ! 1 attached`'.hereto .-a• nd m :; 's,: 'er•--:'Exh`ib t A•. 'p ,` ll• set.' forth.'" :'hereof.'.,as; ; f.`::;fiz y,: th,. ' =�r ,l•0�0.0�'feet sou • . , �t'': >located�-`a ro,x:imatel � (Sa'id. roger.ty ,. R'P Y''.... et and' adj ace'nt, :to;Union:> - of•=>N:E• f4th•_ •Str.e :�.t„ . `'e-i sore Estate s;.•Mob l;e':home-•Park')••, -.and;'tlie; •exsa�ing:'�L . AND SUBJECT' FURTHER •to :,that, certain-•Dec]aration ,o,f, 'Restrictive Covenants •executed'`by'':P.eti t`ioner.''owners on or' about .September • 29 , of 'the Di•rector of,' Re ' 19 7 8 and recorde'd"•� n:,e�:tlie ;..off •ce _ -s. • .h-r -,, v'Hants •.are . ` 0.06102.0'.?` and` which;fsaid Co e Elections:;'•';Rece.iviiig,,.No': 'T81 . .. a^ art:,:her'eof as;:,.if .`fully set _forth: „ ' hereby incorpora'te`d ;esrid='.'made' •p -Ordnance' shall. be effective•.upon SECT• ION•,�II:: 'Thi�s`- r. 1-:I and e^ ('S.') 'days. after i't.s 'publ• i'cat ion• . - its passes"ge a"pp•r.o.,va - 8 . THE' GhTY`�COUN , •• "this --20th',d'ay«.yof "iJovember;. : 197 t - Head it • Clerk Delores A. y . 'is:-20th ..da ,ro•f `Nov,emb,er. :,. , APPROyED BY,::THE'`..MAYOR'• th • • - y• ; , -..,'•:,'.',-:, :*•,:•.... .:'•:':: ':'.•.•:':!:'''''' '''...'::•,.:::`f".-•":::,...:•",,: "'...•.-2:.'':;•.:;':,":,:‘';'..::-'•.: :',..'"::.:1;;;:•.,-•"...,,'- _ei,p,73,':•••:,'• ',..•••,e, ' '.:-.'•-'.':•:., ,:.-. • ] j fi • , e a Y :ent i, Ma .or` ,.y ls.: Delur. ,•': , d as to 'form: Approve • 'i1 Lawrence J. Warren_ ,`-'City_..Attorney,: z 19'7 � : `;Novelrlber=''2 , ,• f pi- ; Date ou • • - . . ; . , • - ".. • • •• „• .. •. . . . . . . . . . . , , • . , '. . ..-Y. - • • ; ' •-. . . , . . • . ... ,• '.,. - • , . . • . , . . . • . , . . . , • • . , • . , . • • ' ,. , • . . ; „ .. . . .• . „ •.. • ' , ' A . „ . EXHIBIT H , -; : P. . . . . . . , . . - . . . ., .; . . . . . . . . , • .1 . . , .. , , . . .- . • . - -.• -: . .„ , „„ . :. - . .. ., . ,,..... .„ . • . , . LEISURE ESTATES - EAST ANNEX . . .. . - -•,•••,-. . • , . , • • . •. . • ..... , . , • The weterly. 240 ,feet 'of•-theiTfollowihg.: • • ,. ..,, . , . . , . -- . . • 1 . , . : . . . . , • .. , • ' The east 435 . 8,- feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, of Section 16 , Township 23 North , Range 5 East , W. M. , ,,... , . ..H. ..... ;• ,, ..-,: . -.. . . .' • .. • EXCEPT th.e .. south 321 feat;' .':.:;. -y ,, , . ., • , - . EXCEPT , the '.nor.th... 24'5 . feet'; - •,,-• ::•`.. , .•.,•, ' • .• . .. : . , . . .. . • • EXCEPT 1 the :,east• 30-„•feet,.: r ...,.,. ...,. . ' ' EXCEPT all coal -affd„ .10.'hi-4.1s-.,.49-d the right to 'explore 'for and • -- mine the same.,. . ' - ,',-;-.'•'-:.:•:,,.• •: . - - •-,. • ..- . • • • - • :. ... ,,-.. . : • .. „ • , - . .. ALSO . . •• : - -. , .. ,. . , . . ... . „ . . . . , . • . . • The south- 2. -feet of :the no,rth245 feet of the east 435 . 8 feet of - the ' Southeast Quarter of the, Southeast .Quarter • of the North- • • • • -• • east QUarter. of;. S'ecti•On:/,.I.6.., TOWn'shiip ,2 North , Range 5 , East , W.M . , in. Ki•ng County , Washington , ying.,, wes :i..3,f. the 'east 195 . 8 . - - : . • . •feet ,thereof; - -.', -,---.:'. .- .:..'-,-. ' ,. .' . . , EXCEPT ' all, coal apd,:•.M1ner.als•••and .the• right. ti....oT. epfore , for`..and 1 •. , :-....•., „ mine • the same .,-;•• . ...,,,-.,....:.•,..,,,,,,-,„,..,-...,,,,, „•-,,,,,,•,:.2,,,-,,......., ,,,,,,., .....,. , ,,,,,,, .,.. ,,, . , , , , . ., . , , . , . l• " . -, --,,,,-,--;-..J-.'...-:-.'•..,-'...::--,:i,-;:•-•''',1-•:-.',„--;•-,•,..-...;,-,,.-'-;',.:•'-'• ';....,:-••-•:-.., : :-• . ..-:,.:. • -'-•-•••='• '' ' ' • . AND . . . .1 , . ,.. . . . .. , . . ., . - " . ... - . .. • _ _ , „ . . - . . .. ... .. ...... . , .„. .„ .. „ , „ , . • , , . . . . „ . . • - -.---.. .:_ • • . The north . 20•0--:..'#:fe'::"•elt. '-6:•1.f..'1:-,,"'•".tiCe•:::•$OUth- ..3:21, 'feet-- of the east 435 . 8 . . • - ...-.- . feet of- the., Southeast OYA.r:ter.,• of.,,the _ OUihea$t Quarter of the Northeast --Quart6r,-,.-..af. :50-ctorr:.1•'6 :..74.4/hhi la- 23 1 North ,', Range 5:, East , . . - . .., ----' '. - W. M„ , • .' :.• - - EXCEPT the- east 30-', '''' ,i County-- 6t 46'6 ,.. 'State 4f Washington . - Situate i n - the .,CitY. 0::'..',.13pfi4.9;, i -:-'; , :. ,.•, ,f r- ,..,:,,..,_• . ....r.,... . ,, -,,, . LEISURE E-STAtES-:::-••••••,--'SQUTW--ANNEX.....,..,,, ,.,,-,'•• „:,...-,•. ,., .,-- :-:•„. •••• ::,,,,.•-• -, .., . .. ,,.... .„....,.,...,•,..,,,...,..,,, ,. , , , ,..„.‘, . . • :_"., . .........._ •••'- ••':-1-:-.-„:-•-, The west •1';•";3';•26. 53•.:',..s.:•''''f'..ee. ...'',•''''-Pf.".':::: 1,4,;.F.',iii'.iith.:::.:j. :3TO., feit.. .9 .---. .thP. Northeast0itheas.•...t -.,,--.....--i'. --i..',,,,-:•.: -. , .„..• „ ..• ... . Qua rte,r..,-'Of•,. tr,re.:---ZSOrUthe.ast.',--•9.9arte)7. of.,.', Se•ct-10,...n:.,..16•••,..,- Township ..23 ..,..,:,:.....:,.;., .,,,,, .,, .... ,.., North , Rang-e. 15-.EAs1,t . -,.14,, ..1".,.,!;.,,,:,,, H.',,,,,,':,:::.„. ..,,:',,,i-,:.--.. '....•:,:'•,--..-*,;, •,, -..-;:--:.....-,-.•..--.,, •- , -- . ' '-..'-r. ,.,,is ' , , , -:', -,., ....,:: ..• .. EXCEPT the ea§t',.,'-....30.-:fe*t71; ,:,...,;.::....:.-v, '':,',•,,-;-. , .-1' ., - . . „., - Si tu ate- -in.- .the-.:;p1ty:.,.ciR..7o-n:on ,.:::.--c00i!,-.. y of. King , .. . ..:S4-te of,.,:i4,. . i_'..ng. toh ,:.-.,', .r. . . .• • I -•:--,:-..,' ..•• ,:;•.-'•.-•:-.-:---.•-•:—•••••"::..-• ;,;,••:,,,,;":.-..-,.:::,,,-„,,,,:,.,,-.,..„.: ...,:.:„..,. .•,-:-..., •,-..„,-„-. „,...., ,,,:-. ••,.,••,:::-.-•••,-.-...••:...... , ,-..., -•...-• ,-,, .. . ....-,-.....-,-.. ..- ,:, ,•,•. . • :,1 '.:.--.-..---.1•,,.•:,...-:','...•.-„,•,-,-,,,'..;-,..:.•••-. 2•-•.-.,..,s.,,z,,,, ..?.?,--J-J.:.'•-•• •: .;•.--'...-•:••,::,',.-••:,•-::••„:--•:-:,',:.-•••--..`-- !---.- :::::•„:',....,..•••••,--.:-:?,-,..,-,:-. '•-- •, - ,, -.- --.„. „-•- --.- -;•,• , ' , .•„•.-:: - . . , . . , - . , . , -.•..• . . .... . . . ,,. . , . • • , ••••- • •., . ... . , .. , .„ ,. , . . , :,,, .. . .,, , . . ,,. , .......,.„ . .,,, , ... , .. ..., . .. . . -• , ." . - • -• - • • , ,-. . •..-. -- „, .,.••• . . . . . , . ., . .„ , ... . . ,. ..• .. ,,,, . , , . : , . . . ..- . ..., , - • .• ...... • ,•-. . . „. .. ,. . . . . . . , . ,. . „ ,.. . -.. ,.....,,::,, • , . . .. , . • ••---',-.Y,::::....,'-2-..-,---,--:••••.-: •,:.-::-,, ,,..---,:',-.-:----•,..-•:-•-•:'--•,-----:',,-,'••-•••-i•,,-,':, ,,-.-::::.•:•7,-•-,•-::,'..::-,.....-• •-•'------:.:,•••••-••••...-.---: -.-,-i-.:. --2,-- '. • ..•-,..-:.- .•,..-,....-,-•-•::-.-::,, •:,,... .• . ., .,...„-,,,, • . . . '',•-.•••.. • :•: : • • . r •-',•:-.:3'S'i--;:::::.;.!;;:-::,'::•.:5-7:,.: ',;:':•':-.,T,-;:',„,-,-.;:i':;;','::":-..->>.:.;,'?'.,-,,,,...:;*,-......,,,Y.';';-5:,' •-::',••'„:•..'-': ,: :'..""-,,,-,.--,';,;:,',..-,',,,,-,",,...,.!.., . •..,'-' :. . .-,_,:,",,....-...,.;,,•...•. ., ,, .. ....,., ,.,., -,,,- , . ' . . ..•-.;', ;•'-''':',,,•••-.....;!.....i..-`•.','.2-'•'-•--"-''-•-';',','":;'.••',",-'., •::,';•,:-'.'•"'J':.•. :','.',.:.-7:.'• '...'T-2, ' '''',......'-.'::::-!.."'i'',•',-•: ,-': ''• ' --'•• ,.. '..--''''.':.•''',.;.•'--•• , ''• •' ., :-.''', '' ' • .„-..,''r"..', ''''' „ ' . : . ' ; :.:•-,,..,.-.,....-.,-'......,:,,,..,,5,1„,:::-...1:,..".:,:!,,c ;:".Y.,--,,,:',:::{2-'',••/,',R .:::'i:;:',":•:''''''•":'''-'.'•:,::•''','''''''-', :!-:'.•.%,::',,.•,,...1. -,..;'-:.,-:j.:;'.1'k:':-..••::.::,-• — •".,:....., "J:.-':'.;'•.•••';::::',:',.-•:,:'.;.-:!;:, '-,'''i•--,-;:.-...:•••!',-,;;;,-",••'.'-,•,:::: • , ... . . . , , • .--•-•'--',:::: ::'''..1,i:f7,::.:Z::-','"::.'" 4:::':''''--21:,.:':'::,'"'', 2,:',''*: ) :::: .'''', ::.--. ?:":"'''',:::':*''::.- .c..:::::::::::::::::. : ' :::!':: ::;:-.::: ::.:';:''':'2'.."''.'''''. = .-..:,-''j';'',:-,,:*': , ... - - . i'' ' ' -:'',',;'''':::.'':::tf:•,,:-;:',--.'i:'':-.: :'--,‘''.'.::':'•=.-.. ,:::•••;:::,',,i7,• •'..--',.: •'',:•'.,:i:,;';',.. .-j,/,-,":'.:.''''.'"''''':•.",',: :;•::::-,.;:"-." .,'•,:,;',-,'-'., 1:1:':••*';;-•.,:,-;',-,.1. •-_-..)'-_:.',,' _...., , ,,...'2,,-,;.'.;:lj.:';',01:''' ::, •::.. '. •.;,,,..`.:-•.-,-;;;j',,.;.,•'•,.; . •',. • .'•'• -,::'-'':''„ .1::'.' ' , .-, -1.•,;-•.:- .".c.::•.-J',Y'..:::‘,';;-':,.--.-,';'.:',-,.',.':-",.-.. ;,',:.'•A','"',,'..,i-','',..",.--,-,•;,;;;;.--,,"i„,'"',-,. :1'",!'-/..i',.'' .•-•-•,:::1,..',-..::::.-':;': ,'"'-'::,-:";;,,, ..,:`,"':.'"',:;:','..",'.--.V.":',,,I..•;'i,"-• :....;.'.:,;:','1,--., --"'•• :;,',-"..- -•'.'-.'-'..-;'„i''',,,..'4.,";•....,•'',-.'•-•-..''.;:-:'/';•-•-• -:'':::,„•:,:•-'::::-',,..:;•:.'.:, • • -; '• •- -:'-• '' -' . ' : 'r . '-, ';-'''''',: ".-.1'.'-'-'''''"-•".'•-`:-.,',-';':-..--'.:/ ,- :''":'';'',J:';,:'.';',.'1, ',:•1::;'::;',"•:,:,'•:•';':-:',''' '.;',:•-'?,':-'.::::',•;.-;":',-•::::.-',-:'.':',::•.•:',;:-.'•':---;lf:,-,'N'P';'i-r,. . ."-.':;.,•;.'-'''''...•?: --"'-..i.-"'-'....-',,';-1,'.-:.:.,--:::,i,',4','- "('',1,,)•;,'-''S--.'-''.'['-'•I'-:.:'''''''',:•:,:.'''.--'1-'.::: '• ' ,.-',..',:r.- '.,• ' •-' ". ' ' . .. . .! . ' -'.-',- '.'=--;:.,1-.':'-.';',,'.1i;.,_';'',,,zi.;:,-'',2''''';':.i'i',,:::,-,';`•,--:j:::':„..-:•- •-';17--1,:: :'.'n,i'•:': :,•:i."-]:;''.i,:.--,:::•--:''.-.',.-: '.,--:',--';',•.,"-'•'..'.',',':--7,•-)-';,•:'' •''.,--'. ,'', ;;''.'' '..':' ' '''i•'-.12','•-;.••:',-:''.' ''.',.'. •`f;•'''' -;-,'',:','-I' ' -,'. . 8L-bLl-.fi1 ON 3Nof3d . . . ABKL?fl Nv3Q C3 3AIS•120SVase ✓✓'' ,00r=,,! .a7d25 `�` • 0 0 o O 40ED o 0 0 ' 0 OStO Ft1 ma s/r Goah or LOP --, t '7d CIK'C '3••.? ' 0 f [1:gl CZ1 •cM. t'lttf at,I et814 :: C ,:4 i-i rt.s:cict-- ::::44,:: :f. .- p" It! � : / A ' : bit - wo{i ?ltdovi OU'A's LS v;L4s G 4' 1 01 , 01 ��!u':ter. . ` I It • %I A ii • _ I0,••—.1",r.: q , i ' .4.0- fit - ct ,I is,o c 8 �, ,r/ . T1� ROI go (150 J ! vv ? • OF4 .► ,, a THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 �' O1 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 04 1 235-2550 O•9�TeD SEP1E.�O November 22 , 1977 Dave Millard Land Planning and Management 22627 - 152nd S . E . :ent , Washington 98031 RE : PROPOSED REZONE BETWEEN EXISTING LEISURE ESTATES MOBILE HOME PARK AND UNION AVENUE N . E . near Mr . Millard : Pursuant to our telephone discussion today we are withholding further processing of a rezone request to the ' T ' zone for the suhiect site . You had indicated a desire to request a Compre- hensive Plan review of the area south of the existing Leisure Estates . The subject site is presently designated single family residence on the Comprehensive Plan . You can however , request that this area he included in the comprehensive plan review . Attached are the procedures and necessary forms to be submitted with any Comprehensive Plan Amendment . The Finance Department will also refund the portion of the rezone fee relating to the subject site ( S20 . 00 ) . Ile are continuing to process the rezone request for the five acre parcel located directly north of the existing Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park . If you , have any further questions , please contact this department . Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen Pl anni no Di rector,.- . / iic/ l�f�' Michael L . Sm th Associate Planner M L S : m s Attachments . cc : Dean H . Bitney _ f , EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION The Westerly 240 feet of the following: The East 435.8 feet of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast • - er of the Northeast quarter of Section 16, Township 23 North, Rang= ` ast, W.M. , EXCEPT the South 321 feet; EXCEPT the North 245, feet; EXCEPT the East 30 feet; EXCEPT all coal and minerals and the right to explore for and mine the same. ALSO The South 2 feet of the North 245 feet -of the East 435.8 .feet of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 16, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, lying West of the East 170 feet thereof; EXCEPT all coal and minerals and the right to explore for and mine the same. AND The North 200 feet of the South 321 feet of the East -435..i8 feet of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast ;t r of the Northeast quarter of Section 16, Township 23 North, R e East, W.M. , 7074 ii A sr 5 s Fr- Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. vECF1\iEb6g \ e NOV 14 1971 9,y4/ 'NG D Ep ixcL 1 I ROVING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : O Finance Department 8 Fire Department Library Department . OPark. Department ® Police Department 0 Public Works Department ✓ 0 Building Div. 0 Engineering Div `' , 0 Traffic Engineering Div . 0 Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee) NI l cA4 Ag1_ <liat 1 (14 DATE : S/ o17 3) PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : K.- ( 1q -71 REZON a1' 1Lr'1 MAJOR PLAT p' W1 To 7 SITE APPROVAL SHORT PLAT SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT OR EXEMPTION AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE (41.0 -7 A7 REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : B4D0c5;— omments : A 6/4:1141001.^........— ,S---3/-2, Signatur f Director or Aut prized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : G.7,, ee���y l Comments : /eot 5- 3/- 7e Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER ,CITY DEPARTMENTS : • Department : Comments : • • • • Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date • REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : I Department : I r � �`� t_.: �....,,, ' ,,C.,C:>y /"y Comments : zA,/s^ < � �'i C•,.5 �' • y� \ rj e y✓f f 1.,,) ate._ !/�• �• � Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date • REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 11 Lf'7 • Comments : /L.)v s (G/L_) //�/C./¢- 1 • • Signature of Director of—Authorized R presentative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : - Department : Comments :. • t ; • Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ; ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: Finance Department 0 Fire Department 0 Library Department 0 Park Department 0 Police Department Public Works Department Building Div. Engineering Div. 0 Traffic Engineering Div. 0 Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee ) IS1M1 //"So/-7g SUBJECT: Review of ECF- ; Application No . : /2177--71 • Action Name : Pti%16 grriOryl XrZIONAV. ) 12DM 7 7 l 1., Please review the attached. Review requested by (date) : 6 G/mod Note : Responses to be written in ink. REVIEW BY OTHER . CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : u.?L Comments : ;j - i Signature of ector or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : „,eel- r > Comments : ith 5i7„ , /ca- - J it y�,c-c,f , Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date { REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : C— 44. P_e' tc Comments : / Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : —/—//-C Comments : ,/�v is Aor Signature off Director or Authorizes Represen ative ate REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : i.i Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ' I REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : • ii: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ;; . ,i : • 1 • PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIP1INARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER I " JUNE 27 , 1978 _ I APPLICANT : DEAN W. BITNEY FILE NUMBER R-179-78 ' A . SUMMARYIOF REQUEST : 1 Applicant requests approval. of a rezone from "G" , "General Classification District" , to "T"., "Trailer Park" , which is the City ' s designation for mobile home park zone . Approval of the request will permit expansion of the existing Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park . The preliminary plan approval process established in Chapter 20 , Mobile Home Parks , will apply to specific, site development . B . GENERALjINFORMATION : ! . Owner of Record : DEAN W. BITNEY 2 . Applicant : DEAN W . BITNEY 3 . Location : Approximately 1000 feet south of N . E . 4th Street and adjacent to Union Avenue N.E. and the existing Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park . 4 . Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department 5 . Size of Property : Approximately 2 .4 acres 6 . Access : Via Union Avenue Northeast 7 . Existing Zoning : "G" , General Classification District , Single Family Residence 8 . Existing Zoning in Area : "G" , General Classification District ; SR-1 , Suburban Residence District ; "T" , Trailer Park 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Single Family i 10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance . C . PURPOSE1OF REQUEST : To obtain the required zoning for expansion of an existing mobile home parik (Leisure Estates ) . i D . HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site was annexed into the City on June 22 , 1966 , by Ordinance No . 2249 . The property directly north and west of the subject site was, rezoned from "G" to "T" on December 15 , 1969 , by Ordinance No . 2527 . The final plan approval for the mobile home park was grantediby the Hearing Examiner on February 22 , 1977 . E . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND : ! . Topography : The site is basically level . 2 . Soils : Alderwood gravelly sandy loam (AgC ) . Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil , and very slow in tlihe substratum. Available water capacity is low , runoff is .1 I'I ANN.I NG DEPARTMENT PRLL1MINARY REPORT TO ritARING EXAMINER • PUBLIC HEARING : DEAN W . BITNEY , FILE NUMBER R-179-78 JUNE 27 , 1978 PAGE TWO slow to medium , and the erosion hazard moderate . This soil is used for timber , pasture , row crops , and urban development . 3 . Vegetation : The site is heavily wooded consisting of various evergreen and deciduous trees and extensive undergrowth . 4 . Wildlife : The existing vegetation on the site may provide some habitat for various birds and mammals . 5 . Water : There is no surface water evident on the site . 6 . Land Use : The subject site is presently undeveloped . Immediately north and south of the property are located single family residences . To the east is a large tract of undeveloped land and to the southeast a single family subdivision . The existing Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park is located to the west adjacent to the subject site . F . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The subject site is within a' relatively sparsely developed area of the city consisting of a mixture of uses , including mobile home parks , single family residences , businesses , cemetery use , and an abandoned gravel pit use . G . PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : The subject site is adjacent to the ' existing Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park which is adequately served by existing water and sewer mains . Storm drainage is provided internally within the park and utilizes the retention pond located at the north edge of the park . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per Ordinance requirements . 3 . Transit : Metro Transit Route 107 operates along Union Avenue Northeast approximately 3/4 mile north of the subject site . 4 . Schools : Honeydew Elementary School is located approximately one mile north of the subject site . McKnight Junior High School is approximately three miles north and west of the subject site and Hazen High School is located approximately two miles north and east of the subject site . 5 . Parks : Kiwanis Park is located approximately one mile north of the subject site . Highlands Park is located approximately one mile north and west of the subject site . H . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 1 . Section 4-729 ; "G" , General Classification District 2 . Section 4-714 ; "T" , Trailer Park 3 . Chapter 20 ; Mobile Home Parks I . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS : 1 . Land Use Report , 1965 , Residential , page 11 , and Objectives , pages 17 and 18 . 2 . Policy Statement , Comprehensive Plan , Renton Urban Area , 1965 . J . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL SYSTEMS : The proposed rezone will not have a direct effect on the natural systems . However , subsequent development of the subject site will disturb soils , increase runoff , and remove existing vegetation on the subject site . These impacts can be mitigated through. proper PI/INNING DEPARTMENT HELIMINARY REPORT TO nLARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : DEAN W . BITNEY , FILE NUMBER R-179-78 JUNE 27 , 1978 PAGE THREE developmental controls , including adequate storm water retention facilities and retention of existing vegetation in the design and development of the subject site . K . SOCIAL IMPACTS : Certain social impacts may occur due to the resultant increased density in the area . L . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW . 43 . 21C , a declaration of non-significance has been issued for the subject proposal . This negative declaration is for the rezone only . Further development of the subject site will require additional environmental review pursuant to the SEPA . M . ADDITIONAL INFORMATION : A vicinity map and a site map are attached . N . AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED : • 1 . City of Renton Building Division . 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division . 3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division . 4 . City of Renton Utilities Division . 5 . City of Renton Fire Department . 0 . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . An application for Comprehensive Plan amendment to low density multiple family residential. designation was referred to the Planning Commission for study and recommendation . However , the commission upon, review of the application determined that the size of the parcel in question did not warrant Comprehensive Plan revision , but the zoning of the parcel can be reviewed by the Hearing Examiner . 2 . The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Element indicates single family residential . However , low density multiple family residential is designated for the area of the existing mobile home park . Given the fact that the Comprehensive Plan is a flexible document which does not contain precise boundaries , the extension of the mobile home park zoning may be considered . The question is the extent of such expansion and its overall compatibility with the purpose and intent of the Comprehensive Plan . 3 . It is clear from the map element of the Comprehensive Plan that single family residential land use was intended between the low density multiple family residential use and Union Avenue Northeast . However , it should be noted that the construction of the existing Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park , directly contiguous to the west boundary of the subject site , has • changed the character of the area somewhat since the last areawide land use analysis (December 15 , 1969 ; Ordinance No . 2526 ) , and , therefore , has an effect on the planning and development of the site and surrounding area . 4 . The adjacent properties directly to the south and north contain existing single family residences . Such existing land use patterns must also be considered as part of a zoning amendment . (Comprehensive Plan Land Use Report , 1965 , Objectives No . 1 and 4 , page 17 . ) 5 . The proposed plan for mobile home park extension provides for 12 mobile home lots or approximately 5 dwelling units per acre . • I'I ANN.I NC DEPARTMENT I>HLLIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : DEAN W . BITNEY , FILE NUMBER R-179-78 JUNE 27 , 1978 PAGE FOUR If the property were platted into single family residential lots with a 50 foot residential access street , the total would be 10 lots or approximately 4 dwelling units per acre . 6 . It may be reasonable to consider the proposed rezone to "T " given the substantial change in land use in the area and the flexible interpretation of the Comprehensive Plan . (Comprehensive Plan Land Use Report , 1965 , Objective No . 6 , page 18 . ) However , it may also be reasonable to consider establishing a maximum density of 10 lots to provide consistency with the Comprehensive Plan Map Element and the existing single family residential land uses . 7 . To provide such rezoning to "T" and compatibility with both the single family uses to the north , south , and east , and the existing mobile home park to the west , it may also be appropriate to review where on the subject site the maximum 10 lots should be situated . Preferably the density should be less near Union Avenue Northeast to provide consistency with the Comprehensive Plan Map Element , the existing single family uses , and provide more entrance area landscaping and buffering . (Comprehensive Plan Land Use Report , Objectives No . 1 , 2 , and 4 . ) 8 . A copy of suggested lot arrangements , and buffer areas is attached . 9 . Various other municipal departments have reviewed the proposed rezone and indicated approval with comments . These are attached to this report . 10 . Existing streets and utilities are adequate for the proposed use . (See attached comments from Traffic Engineering and Utilities Divisions . ) 11 . The significant evergreen and deciduous trees on the site should be preserved and integrated into site development as• much as possible . P . PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION : Recommend approval of rezone from "G" to "T" subject to the following conditions to be established as restrictive covenants : 1 . Maximum site density shall be 10 mobile home lots preferably arranged similarly to the attached exhibit , subject to Planning Department review and approval . 2 . Trees shall be preserved as much as possible and incorporated into site design and development . No trees shall be removed without prior approval of the Planning Department . Detailed landscape plans for buffer areas , entrance areas , and individual lots shall be approved by the Planning Department . Trees and vegetation removed by site development shall be supplemented with additional suitable material . 3 . A minimum 15 foot natural/supplemental landscaped buffer shall be established along the north and south property lines . A minimum 30 foot natural/supplemental landscaped buffer shall be established along Union Avenue Northeast . 4 . No buildings , structures , or improvements other than landscaping together with the required screening fence shall be permitted within 30 feet of the east property line , within 15 feet of the south property line , and within 15 feet of the north property line . ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department Public Works Department GI Building Div. 0 Engineering Div Traffic Engineering Div . • 0 Utilities Engineering Div .✓ FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee ) NI l�1•�A 1 Suva► DATE : S/30173' PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR: 1 - 1q -7g REZON 61 trY MAJOR PLAT �4�-OV4 ( :To `r SITE APPROVAL SHORT PLAT SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT OR EXEMPTION AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE (0/(p1--a REVIEW BY OTHER.. CITY DEPARTMENTS : T /� Department : 294%p Comments : 64/ -00 Signatur f Director or Aut orized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : rx�„�ee;,,.L�, Comments : / ' /e& 5- 3/- 7e Signature of Director or . Authorized Representative Date • REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : WAIL 1-f Comments : tt O r pa Kftc7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : %r-; /' - I. ; Lac 'c.'k / y Comments : A 74> s s2Di -.V/7-ci2 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : ,06) S /6'4._.) / A4-1--1 r . i . / 1 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date is REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : • Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date • • 1 • ROUTING FOR RFVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: . Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department Public Works Department Building Div. Engineering Div. 0 Traffic Engineering Div. e Utilities Engineering Div. FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee ) ) 1 ►1 S �v/- SUBJECT : Review of ECF- (29q-7Y ; Application No . : /-J7,-•-7�' Action Name : 4J 11 TO 7" Please review the attached. Review requested by (date) : (v1L/ 7) Note : Responses to be written in ink. REVIEW BY OTHER. CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 1)6 sL Comments : ` ,IS/ 3/? Signature of ector or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : ?„-,ee-y/nj Comments : AL 5,7n , Ga x/ P-11 5- 3/- 7f Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : /�� % �` /s_,�_s ,�: Jai << � Comments : - 7-2 r' �J 1 Signature of Director or Authorized presentative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : f/( z Comments : l. io• ///:' Signature of Director or Authorize ' Represen ative ate REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date . . . __i__, -----, • .!':,,..% - .1. 1 - • CIE 17 '1.1 11 1 - -..\2-,-.4: n ' , I , P T — i -:- v ii, (--,- -lqiitil..;:_i —1 ‘0 g. T.%.0 ,k.• ; 0,4 , \;''':.1, "••? ; .:: zi° '1"- ,•II : ri , 141, ,, , ,H.,,,„[.. a .)1.• ',. .t 4 ,,:. .a, . ., • R..1 ,, .-r- - .• - .1.• r- . 6 ..,A,_,,i, ; . i ; , .. ,..) ,,,,, . ,., ., •,-,,,it:,., ..:-.. .:, .;., ,, ,• .,:2 - . . „ ;.• -,,,/ . ci..i... .1- is, , .,,...,,,,..,,..,..,,, _ ,.„ „A rt ,t,z r+. :41 4 ..,,' 1 I. .j 1 '• ' ',6 ' ' - . '',„,.e.7••••p.,.. • •:, k.t...,'„.„.-' ,• z ; : ; ' r_ ..F.,,, ,, i CI 11' .417/411,1a :) :S!ss vs-. Mg III a 1 Visli is _. all s. ,•:.• •••-.."' 4..' \\o' - ÷-;--0 a-- :7 g.., - ,„ . I I- ,...t.t-i.. , N•E•,'"••Pi. . N.C Wm -s:r- ''' 's 1 11'1 n 1 1 ' ''. ',, ' ,,,,... ., . z . • *. g , i ri-N.. ', ., 56•13, mu : '76 ., zr a' i . : •.;' . s g ' ,Fel 4 7r-c-c-nr-irt-- I, "..,/- ‘`' ; . 4 ' .1.-f .;77 ffl III, E t.4 I.[.t.l'.t.i• : i 1 1 lowtm.....wri.,..., ,,.... ...,--T ad . Eli : ' ,, p Itirv.,..- i • , SR-1 i-GS' an.i f4I---1 •1 14.11'' Pr,-qw or MA prabLic I•••••j ''' ''''''''l . 1 • . A, ej o•L•••• I.i. 4•••.L/ ' 1 L - -1.' —- -R-3 ,- , 1; _ • _ ___ _i 4 .1 I ! I , ! • 1 r • i r ,.1-VV.., liti.41 k . I 1 1 I 4 11 I i I I I I.___ #01.. .... ) I. , • • . I I ' 4 ' .•.. ' .'' 1+. ...:*'" 19 0' is , s ' .o . -o O...h• : --•-I - Rill-' - / - `'%;' 411: ---C'''''''''' aC 2 ' I TH -. 1 L . ! 9 • --I . '. 1 11 , I • ___L___: 1 . :i_i_., i ,I3?li " I .. • ' .. .„) ° ,...:-...4- . .0 --Fri --.......--- .0. /'°. ...'- G H— 1 1 1 - ,.-,[k •- - „/ GRENVVOOD 1 =or i MIN , 'OR / / - CE,METERY , , ,/ / .- , I . _ .. / / .R1=45". 1 ; :,-*00.00:-.6:0•009- ' / / i . 1 I L-I . . ... i 1 a _ s L ! .___ .______._ ___. I - 1 I 1 -i- - C D 1/41 j___ t - - I _ . I -- _ . I I .. ) • ,4‘/ — . ___ I ' I ' I I I.. .. . — • ! Ii • ; I .G , , , ei . ._ ______ _ ii T , , , , , Su ea EC 7 I SITE 1 /0/ - 1 1 1 • . . , A , I .41 ' . • I ,,CO/ / I . i_r_ 1 i i • 4 4 /'4; / 1 ,• I / , I / / I 1 • • 1. . ' I ; , - --t• • ,Airo, ,,• 1 •• , . . sa . . I / ar 5 .1 ,'','111011111 ;lin. 1 .,-,.:•••, ....' ' d I 4 4 . \ Y‘ S I 4 I • ' 1 1 • . ,.. 1 . , , • . , ; ; .i,l—i, - ,I. , 1 ; • i r I 1 t t li si t t. • B11 1r . , . I • r f , i-'' ' ' ' . . . . . . . , . . • . . \ . . ; APPLICANT Dean W 8/-741 e y TOTAL AREA -t a.Yecr-es PRINCIPAL ACCESS /' Union /itienve. S.E7 EXISTING ZONING "6"t Ger.era.i CassIneicaiio4 DStrc7L • EXISTING USE LIndetielope4 . • . PROPOSED USE ,c;rlte_ Fex,,,,;ly 6110koi le lionle ZOts COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN •Sillic retni ;/2, Res i Ck..vdia./ , . . COMMENTS • • • , . . . 115D Ittl 1:1. 0 141 11 I i 113 Fc;': ° a® jcj �i j [ZI 151 NA._ - .- - - -- I • I ' I C1 ��; its �CI�I"rfJ� U l ei�te..E STATES l� Mogtl.E vio1,wa g_ tZt( 1 a�F• Li • is::::::::::::::::::::::::.::: %:I• s r. Cl/ I-1 I;6, , ri *+z sU1:23 5. ..0 60' 1 ` s.✓r. atND PL. �� [�l8! �lol zo y�� Q ❑as° ® 0 st ; 02s4 p z Q Q pz�ti o o ll 1 O o II 03o0 0 SE.3SD5T• 0 `� a306 0 0 ►�� I 0 3 i-• I 1 SCALE /'t=ao ' lip E0a SETT sire-, DEAN 8irNEy 1 RE2ONE NO. R-/79-?8 • • F rr?. { •• .rti fa ...t .. : ll x? ' • !1 \ "NeT - .. ..‘... .1.'--....7.1.: '��'" 240.00' iii t7i OD 1ti( • � - * • ... ..rigt LEGENb • k i �.., �_�, ?; ::, :.r��.:�T�`I' '+' Y f -_.\- ��;j .- - — PP�OPEP)T7 . L1 t'fE • . L�-� _ I' S TO111' - • GOCiTOUP1 ,LINE 1. , - . Ji..�.�. �� � \ � - ; E Ali r1ATUr AL L4NOS.-APE r �� • i, cl D , . \t I \• . •...f/ \ 1"iAN- PLANTED LANt73CAPE . , \V / �\ • i. • 3Cox Coo COACT-a stZE • oqlsr A, / " - - '..‘ 14.'''s\ ,.:• \ 4 'W ; UNIT TADULATIOI'1: i" = 20 • f __ i - / / ' () I '►'(`v \ TYPE IyO. COI"lI"1ENT5 i ,���� L-) �' ,�/ IVIA I 4, r I�OU73LE WIDE (A) (.�Ox 75 (MI 1 ) ; 3 - - ' '• A . f• I 1 \ .. T1'�IPLE WINE 12 �Ox bo (AVG.) ,, „,... , . �X Co6 L' '>�oxCob �' • 1 562 x(ca __i t 1 ' • . � ,...y / 'F Y1/y' \ f1 8�1' 00' '>�o" W I(v� 80' • T �=E .o 7� -----AC PAVerierrr• 71 POA� � i �' �� I �� �t I 0 36• ?4\:-'.\\\ �yZ7 _ 'G' ( G� ' ." PjUFFE?4 • wir • 'J Xo xCoq XCoeJ~� Q I • I) /. . \ . • N• • _ . . . r .:: , , . • . . . . , . . .,„ _ . k, I 3CvxCoB -; 'IA . 4 .. T'1E=,:, . ____.-- Fly t71 �' eD I,`� - - \ .. • 1. Pr ,.• •':''7)- %. P.P((.O . . . . .. . s r.---'...'"---•••'---. Atanalt.," ' I r."- .. . ' \\... ',..a .ia. . amimilmmeme... .. , . . • ' . . glillialri ...cp.,. ,.: : ...- . • . EANO '. ' .:„- ':..4,. ill .P ;SF/ . '. ' ., . :1. 0. /‘1'&' '' .': •.. 00411kp,,., . . • , ' ...:,..aen, 110101' . -,6...- • -,--...-ral - . - ' X '"'"'''.47:3..<''''''''d"a"*"" sA _, ,- 'Ciao°O, 3Co ►./ ••��.�I h1ATUr7A�. LA{'1 Q1 'E , t • • nuFFE f 1O' io • � � a PROPOSED/FINAL _ ,CLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE. _JN-SIGNIFICANCE Application No . R-179-78 0 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . 294-77 0 FINAL Declaration Description. of proposal Rezone from "G" to "T" Proponent DEAN W . BITNEY Approximately 1000 feet south of NE 4th St . and Location of Proposal adjacent to Union Ave . NE and the existing Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park . Lead Agency Renton Planning Department This proposal has been determined to 0 have ® not have a significant. adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS ® is is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) (c ) . This decision was ma e after 'review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmentalnAsignificance : This declaration is for rezone only . Any future development shall comply with applicable city standards . This declaration is further based on providing development which is compatible with the single family residence area , and includes preservation of the existing trees per approval of the Planning Department . Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a ( proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official Gordon Y . Ericksen Title Plan g D . ecto: A Date June 20 , 1978 Signature City of Renton Planning Department C 7 G._ 1 / ' G �. CITY OF RENTON -- _-) REZONE APPLICATION FOR OFFICE US+E ONLY / , LAND USE HEARING , APPLICATION NO. EXAMINER 'S ACTION APPLICATION FEE, $ //D• APPEAL FILED RECEIPT NO. 11y41�77 2905 CITY L ACTION _/ Q c � p FILING DATE '`/�' %"/ 5 -7 f "D �NCE` � AND DATE RE�� HEARING DATE V� RECEIVED • O /4''S �`��® G112aEC 6�i -; � APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 10 -NW 14 1977 mike( 26 1918 1 . Name Dean W. Bitney \ �, -e 255- ''�'G DEP P V G De Address 108 Factory Avenue North. RentorL•,' 7 * . • •ton 98055 3. Property petitioned for rezoning is located on Union Avenue Southeast • between Northeast 4th Street and Maple Valley .Golf Course 4 . Square footage or acreage of property 104,680 S.F. = 2.403 acres 5 . Legal description of property - (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet) • See Exhibit A I • • • • 6 . Existing Zoninq General Use (G) Zoning Requested Trailer Park (T) Comprehensive Plan shows area as single family land use. NOTE TO APPLICANT: The following factors are considered in reclassifying property. Evidence or additional information to substantiz,i your request may be attached to this sheet. (See Applicat:i Procedure Sheet for specific requirements . ) Submit this fri , in duplicate. 7. Proposed use of site Construction of home sites (lots) for double-and • triple-wide mobile homes; qualityhousing at a reasonable• cost. (Approxi- mate .density 6 UPA. ) 8. List the measures to he taken to reduce impact on the surrounding area. (a) Retained specimen fir trees and, where possible, a natural vegetation buffer strip!. (b) Replanted cleared areas. (c) Installed a solid-barrier • concrete fence. (d) Constructed a storm drainage system. (e) Employed a security service to control bikers and R.V. 's. • • 9 . How soon after...the rezone is granted do you intend to develop the site? Immediately. ! 10 . Two copies of plot plan and affidavit of ownership are required. Planning Dept. 1-77 i CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ' ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM ,`� OF RFj� RECEIVeb �o Z. N0V .14 -� �i FOR OFfICE USE ONLY 'de_ l 79_ 7�I • �'"""'�-��� �� .. Application ri o - / / - �yl�, _ 'E Environmental Checkl i si: No: , Z?/: -,,Z 9/-,7�. �' D i� �/j: • . PROPOSED, dale: - FINAL , date: ,`4. ON � jl0 Declaration of Significance � Declar•ation of Significance - 26 1918 I 0 .Declaration of Non-Significance El Declaration of Non-Significan,= Y k►, '• 1 • . , COMMENTS ; 4• ""�� � • Introduction, The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires . all state anld local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own 'actions !and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly .affecting .the qual;ity .o_f the environment. The purpose iof-thischecklist is to help the agencies involVed determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to theianswers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all • , agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- , out unnecessary delay. . The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, • even though completion may nut occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all •j of. the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. H NOTE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the I . next questii n. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM • I . BACKGROUND ,. 1 .1 . Name of.Proponent Dean W. Bitne - • Z. Address and phone number of Proponent: 108 Factory_Avenue._North,_.Renton,-Washington 98055 __ 1 (206) 255-1080 —._—. --- 3. Date Checklist submitted November -f_._1977 • 4. Agency requiring Checklist ._City._of Renton _(Department of Planning) I 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: Leisure Estates West Annex (201 Union Avenue Southeast) 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : The applicant proposes_to construct servi_ci,ng. i.e.4-sewer_and • • . water, to 2 parcels (worth side ^'23,520 S.F. and south side -- . .. . - • ^' 81 ,160 S.F.). separated by the Leiauri- Estates entrance street and install residentall housing in the` forL of mobile homes (double and triple-Wide units); on said'parcels ... see'. zoning • ...-exhibit. . . . . . . ._. ... . .• .. . . . f • . -2- 1. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including : ; any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : Property_located alnng_the entrance to Leisure Estates, an . adult rental Mobile- Home- Park. Sewer, water and drainage lines ,. exist in the entrance street. Selective clearing of the property has been performed4reteining the specimen fir trees. 8. Estimatld date for completion of the proposal : Jul 1978 _.-__-- -.-- Y� 9. List of all permits , licenses or government, approvals required for the proposal • (federal , state and local --including rezones) : _Rezone and__site_plan__.approval..-.-City-_Q Renton_Dep tment_of Plaanin,==. Servicing approval..- City of Renton Department of Public Works , 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: Yes, there are_p a_for_._expans-ion.-_of the_park_to the north onto • property owned by the applicant. (See rezone application,] :;• 11. Do.you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered' by your proposal? If yes , explain: No • - --12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- ' posal ; if none has been completed , but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: • _NA._ II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explantions of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) • : 1 ( 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? . , ES Y MUTE NO (b) Disruptions, displacements , compaction or over- .of the: soi l? X YES MAYBE NO (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief . features? X YES MAYBE WO— (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any ; unique geologic or •physical features? YET_ MAYBE (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , i�%h,er on or off the ,site? , , ••• X • ;;g YES MAYBE NO (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean• or any. bay, inlet or lake? • X YES— WET NO• • Explanation: (b) A limited amount of grading will .be required for street and pad construction; the homes will be Sited to the exiling con- tours to further minimize grading. . (a) Removed natural vegetation • will he replacedvwith.mantplante4 vegetation.. and impervious surfacesiH .during the construction period, soil erosion rmight. be expected. -3- �l , • (2) Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? MI YEF MAYBE NO . (b) The creation of objectionable odors? V! MAYBE ' (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (a) Approximately 12 to 18 vehicles will be associated wit the Mobile Home Park expansion and will contribute CO. NO and SO4 emissions found in the ambient air. Temporary deterioration will of:. • . during: construction due o ust aid pke from burning. The impact airs lity, however, will De insign icon . - (3) Water. Will the proposal result in: _('a).'. Changes :In currents , or the course of.,direction of • ,., •• • water movements, in either marine or fresh waters?. YES .MAYBE NO ;I (b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or 'the rate and amount of surface water. runoff? X YES M B NO . (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? YES MARE NO (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water • :+.body? • .. .i.',, X ._ ',YES- MAYBE NO (e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature , dissolved oxygen or turbidity? _X . YES air YE NO , . - . (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of . . ground waters? X YES MA BE NO (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either • through direct additions or withdrawals , or through . interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X . YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of .leachate, . V. phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? X YES B NO (i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X YES MAYBE N� Explanation: (b, d & e) Grading and impervious surfaces created will change absorption rates on approximately 80% of the property. Store water • ' runojf is_controlled in.this area by means of. storm drainage :! "ti�htlinea" directed to detention facilities at the northwest corns : (4) F o Wi l the proposal result in: *See below (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass , crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? _�g F . YES RATITE N� (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or • endangered species of flora? X YES B NO (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? • YEAS RAM" F (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural ,crop? __X__ TES— MA NO E xp 1 a n a t i o n: (a) Most of the vegetation on this property has been removf ex e t f r rate icall locatted v e ati n clamD ecime tree a? natural Dufrers aIo aaiacent proper lines. 1D entua�ly, aul .e lear:d areas wV 'l be e lanted ' i grass and/orde o ativ ' . , .. 4 ' Al' _: ,' _ , an�napingr ' a .antr ce . sreet nag ahead:; . been:accomp 'ished.. .. . *of the existing L.obile Home Park. Some siltation/pollution of the storm waters is unavoidable; the detention facilities existing on th ! site will, mitigate this impact. V J -4- �)• (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: I • (a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? YES WET NO (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X • YES MAYBE NO (c Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement ...,7'..; :. 1:,.• ' of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? YES MAYBE NO E xp 1 a n a t i o n: s) Ap roximatel of. the existing wildlife habitats �m yy smaesu� `to sthe a s. d b 'da will be eliminated or modified at• cahCr he po en _ al deve�• . ent -_ $omestic t c - ec� I this type f dev lopment a;:' e expected too mrt t e reoii ng of natural spec�es• (d) The exists wildlife habitat will be unavoidably deterioratoi. on the property-1_ --__-_-- (6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? YESA MAYBE NO • Explanation: Construction (short-term) noise levels will be inter- mittently hi-gh due to the use of heavy_ equipment. Ambient noise le_vale will_ are_aae_ due_to_ daily reaidentia _ traffie ,estimated at approximately 40-50 trips. (7) Li t and Glare, Will he pro sal produce new light or glare? YES- M YBE NO- . E x p 1 a n a t i_o n: Mob110.home__yard ..and_street_.lighting and automobile heIadli is will__be._the_primary_ sQ _of new lig or glare. ! ; 1. • (8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X YES MAYBE NO • E x p lla n a t i o n: The _proposed._development_is consistent. pith the compre- hensive_plea eaignated_.land uae--(single family)-and-_nompatible I with' the existing_ Mobile Home Park..__._ (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in : (a) ( Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? i YES ' MAYBE NO . ,. (b) : Dep}eti.on• of any. nonrenewable natural resource? X YES M YBE NO Explanation: The use of electricity, F88•_oi etc._for home 11Shtrnng$ heat� and o ling (e, c.. inevitably result in the do•, .. consumption ansl_d pletion__of_._natur _rea ura�_ Such consumption will occ a ass o this de elopme ti the demandi,br €he y_.o�_ nenmon_and. Kin ununt figs been aA i g Y sad. (10) Risklof Upset.. Does the proposal involve a risk of an 1 expldsion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? _ � 1B RUNE NO Explanation: M.A. ---- I (11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- butioh, density, or growth rate of the human population of an� area? .YE�(S- M B N) Ex 1 a a t i o n: The ro o8ed develo merlst willve a denait (6 UPA) Y ® on sfacfl aYs?f rmitted shift .i.ndJacn distribuitton or pop a On scan be expected to accelerate the growthN:ot.thiara sa. . i -5- J ( 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X YES MAYBE NO Hi Hi E x p l a n a t i o n: The proposed development will provide adult housing •1 at an attainable cost, which is presently in short supply. ( 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: • - (a) Generation of additional vehicular ,movement? _X YES MAYBE NO • (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? . • YES-• MAYBE NO . (c) • Impact upon existing transportation, systems? YET- MAYBE N- (d) Alterations to present patterns .of circulation or • movement of people and/or goods? X . YES M NO (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? • X VT MAYBE NO • (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? X YES RUNE NO Explanation: . • • . ,. A.. I : • : . : : . : . - c� Duel o l .e o=e r• o ��• - • • •--oua reeve= ISt�• g� t adecuatel gerrd by the exists c rculition 8�stems. Due to th� j, o e m es- r s rtI�ggus s em will ha e. increased e. Z Increased traffic on MAUnionyve. a two- ane awed col= � @C Or get ��dwith turni na m - - • • • ar , w • create bdditional opporrun.ttybr vehicle cyle HB8o e (14) Publ i vServi ces. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or. . ped4strien COnfli°c • •result to a need for new or altered governmental servites^ ... • ' • in any of the following areas :. (a) Fire protection? _(_ YES MAYBE NO ' (b) Police protection? � •• YES MAYBE NO (c) i, Schools? X • YES • MAYBE NO • • (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? • • • YES MAYBE NO (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? YES MAYBE NO- 1 (f) Other governmental services? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: The impacts of the above questions are not signif i— cant or substantial. , ' • (15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? • X • YES MAYBE N(- • •(b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X • YES- MAYBE Explanation: The energy demand for the proposed development is moderate and attainable. The impact of this proposal related to ,energy on a regional basis .is not known. •p • (16). Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? vESr- MAYBE NO (b) ( Communications systems? •_-X_ ' ; YES MAYBE NO • (c) Water? X YES MAYBE NO 1 H :I . i I, - . _ - r ! / -6- (d) ' Sewer or septic tanks? • .. YES MYB AE N0� (e) Storm water drainage? X • . YES r (f) Solid waste and disposal? X 1 YES WEE NO • Explanation: Utility and drainage lines have been constructed to , service the proposed development. The demand for service is : ,, relatively moderate and within the means of the City and private , f utility companies to provide. . , • (17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X TM MAYBE Na` Explanation: N.A. • (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction, of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive • ' • siti open to public view? X • YES MAYBE NO . • Explanation:' The propo d_ACL(1,112pment will convert a cleared ,-:; ' undeveloped parcel, with a DaYed and landscaped street corridor . . _ .. ., • . •. through it, into an urban settillg,_i.e. , residential housing with the subsequent aesthetics _change. (19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? ; i;i YES MAYBE NO ' Explanation: The existing Mobile Home Park has developed its own passive and active recreation facilities, i.e. , pitch and putt course; tennis Court; parkways; swimming pool; etc. :il,; (20) Archeological Historical . Will the ! proposal result in an alteration ofa significant archeological or historical • site; structure, object or building? . I TM NO Explanation: N.A. -. - h i I III. SIGNATUREI I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of mon-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full dis losure on my part. Proponent: Z't• .--,e (signed) I�P-ds/1.17 e..... h 11.1.q-¢.i (name printed) REST RE aECk111ED ° of . • gp,11 '. ` City of Renton2� leis ,�� Planning Department � 1= � I . may__..... -'?42/ � [t 1 - B • : r G D MEMORANDUM TO Files DATE 6/ 15/78 FROM W. Roberts SUBJECT Public Notification Copies of the notification to Mr. Bitney were distributed to adjacent neighbors by Steve Munson and also provided to Jean Truman of the Heather Downs Subdivision . • ) -- THE CITY OF RENTON a . MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 0 O ' cry CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0 * I�� 235-2SSO 4if0 SEP1t� June ;14 , 1978 Mr. Dean W. Bitney 108 Factory Avenue North Renton , Washington 98055 RE : . NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G TO T , File No . R- 179-78 ; property located along the west side of Union Avenue N . E. , approx . 200 ' north of S . E . 2nd Place , along the existing entrance road to Leisure Estates Dear Mr. Bitney: The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on May 26 , 1978 A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for June 27 , 1978 at 9 : 00 a. m. Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present . All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing . If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department , 235-2550 . Very truly yours , Gordon ,Y . Ericksen Planning Director / f B y . Michael L . Smith 'Associate Planner cc : Dave Millard , LPM NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON JUNE 27 , 1978 , AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: 1. DEAN W. BITNEY, APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G TO T, File No. R-179-78; property located along the west side of Union Avenue N.E. approximately 200 feet north of S. E. 2nd Place, along the existing entrance road to Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park. Legal description on file in the Renton Planning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JUNE 27, 1978 AT 9.00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. GORDON Y. ERICKSEN PUBLISHED June 16, 1978 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION STEVE MUNSON , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, on the 14th day of June 19 78 _ SIGNED it.e711,a-o-utfervt ("\ dGF111ED O Affidavit of Publication v JUN 23 191 b STATE OF WASHINGTON .0 COUNTY OF KING ss. ` � 9 is Ann t.° s8lb being first duly sworn on s;^.1;i .;t:7.c` CZr.,k oath,deposes and says that s the �' of THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four(4) times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and' has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred , to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, - . , and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an'office maintained ' at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Renton , Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, • Nota ce of , b:1 ic •-enrin4: Washington.That the annexed is a . .1NOTICE OF . 1 PUBLIC,�HHE�ARING REN�TON WA D USE as it was published in regular issues(and HEARINGMINER ' not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period RENTON,,WASHINGTON • , , A PUBLIC HEARING k WILL BE .HELD BY' THE RENTON LAND USE.! of 1 consecutive issues,commencing on the HEARING EXAMINER AT•, 'HIS REGULAR MEETING. : i: 1 y j I,7r/a, r�r•f IN`THE COUNCIL CHAMB day of ,19 ,and ending the ER, CITY HALL, RENTON; ; WASHINGTON, ON JUNE i 27, 1978, AT 9:00 A:M.'To i CONSIDER THE FOLLOW-, ,I day of ,19 both dates - ING PETITIONS:•• i inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- 1. DEAN W. BITNEY,.•.r,, scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee APPLICATION FOR REr 1 ZONE FROM G,.TO.T, charged for the foregoing `-'+ File No.,A 179-7ti,,`prop has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the arty located-along the '..j first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent x west.side,of;Union Av-' insertion. enue N.E:approximately j L 2 Pla feet�no h ofJS E 2ndf I Place,alomgTthe ezistiNIt . (.h'e f ,• i.e k - Public Notices a?T+ entrance road to Leisurey `i Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of Estates Mobile Home _ Park. Legal description 1 ^ 'on file in the Renton O 19 . ` , Planning Department. ,j ALL INTERESTED PER- Op (SONS TO SAID PETITIONS r — �- TARE INVITED TO BE PRE-I '� Notary Pub ' / and for the State of Washi on, !SENT AT THE PUBLIC residing at Kent, King nty. 'HEARING ON JUNE-27, 1978 AT 9:00 A.M.TO''EXY 'PRESS THEIR OPINIONS. - —Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June . GORDON Y..ERICKSEN 9th, 1955. ,RENTON PLANNING, DIRECTOR' • —Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, i Fubblisshed,n'The Renton; rdC- adopted by the newspapers of the State. R®cohronicle 164 119,78 R-41995" A V.P.C.Form No.87 2 RECEIVED PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF RENTON NEARING EXAMINER PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINERJUN NEARING G EXAMINER 2 1978 JUNE 27 , 1978 AM PM 718,9110,11e1211 E2o31415,6 A APPLICANT : DEAN W. BITNEY FILE NUMBER : R-179-78 EXHIBIT NO. A . SUMMARY OF REQUEST : ITEM NO. •F, /2 ?` 71 Applicant requests approval of a rezone from "G" , "General Classification District" , to "T " , "Trailer Park" ,- which is the City ' s designation for mobile home park zone . Approval of the request will permit expansion of the existing Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park . The preliminary plan approval process established in Chapter 20 , Mobile Home Parks , will apply to specific site development . B . GENERAL INFORMATION : • ! . Owner of Record: DEAN W. BITNEY 2 . Applicant : DEAN W. BITNEY 3 . Location : Approximately 1000 feet south of N . E . 4th Street and adjacent to Union Avenue N.E. and the existing Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park . 4 . Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department 5 . Size of Property : Approximately 2 .4 acres 6 . Access : Via Union Avenue Northeast 7 . Existing Zoning : "G" , General Classification District , Single Family Residence , 8 . Existing Zoning in Area : "G" , General Classification District ; "SR-1" , Suburban Residence District ; "T" , Trailer Park 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Single Family 10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle and .posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance . C . PURPOSE OF REQUEST : To obtain the required zoning for expansion of an existing mobile home park (Leisure Estates ) . D . HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site was annexed into the City on June 22 , 1966 , by Ordinance No . 2249 . The property directly north and west of the subject site was rezoned from "G" to "T" on December 15 , 1969 , by Ordinance No . 2527 . The final plan approval for the mobile home park was granted by the Hearing Examiner on February 22 , 1977 . E . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND : ! . Topography : The site is basically level . 2 . Soils : Alderwood gravelly sandy loam (AgC ) . Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil , and very slow in the substratum . Available water capacity is low , runoff is PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO ritARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : DEAN W. BITNEY , FILE NUMBER R-179-78 JUNE 27 , 1978 PAGE TWO slow to medium, and the erosion hazard moderate . This soil is used for timber , pasture , row crops , and urban development . 3 . Vegetation : The site is heavily wooded consisting of various evergreen and deciduous trees and extensive undergrowth . 4 . Wildlife : The existing vegetation on the site may provide some habitat for various birds and mammals . 5 . Water : There is no surface water evident on the site . 6 . Land Use : The subject site is presently undeveloped . Immediately north and south of the property are located single family residences . To the east is a large tract of undeveloped land and to the southeast . a single family subdivision . The existing Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park is located to the west adjacent to the subject site . F . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The subject site is within a ; relatively sparsely developed area of the city consisting of a mixture of uses , including mobile home parks , single family residences , businesses , cemetery use , and an abandoned gravel pit use . G . PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : The subject site is adjacent to the existing Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park which is adequately served by existing water and sewer mains . Storm drainage is provided internally within the park and utilizes the retention pond located at the north edge of the park . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per Ordinance requirements . 3 . Transit : Metro Transit Route 107 operates along Union Avenue Northeast approximately 3/4 mile north of the subject site . 4 . Schools : Honeydew Elementary School is located approximately one mile north of the subject site . McKnight Junior High School is approximately three miles north and west of the subject site and Hazen High School is located approximately two miles north and east of the subject site . 5 . Parks : Kiwanis Park is located approximately one mile north of the subject site . Highlands Park is located approximately one mile north and west of the subject site . H . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 1 . Section 4-729 ; "G" , General Classification District 2 . Section 4-714 ; "T" , Trailer Park 3 . Chapter 20 ; Mobile Home Parks I . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS : 1 . Land Use Report , 1965 , Residential , page 11 , and Objectives , pages 17 and 18 . 2 . Policy Statement , Comprehensive Plan , Renton Urban Area , 1965 . J . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL SYSTEMS : The proposed rezone will not have a direct effect on the natural systems . However , subsequent development of the subject site will disturb soils , increase runoff , and remove existing vegetation on the subject site . These impacts can be mitigated through proper I'LANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO ntARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : DEAN W. BITNEY , FILE NUMBER R-179-78 JUNE 27 , 1978 PAGE THREE developmental controls , including adequate storm water retention facilities and retention of existing vegetation in the design and development of the subject site . K . SOCIAL IMPACTS : • Certain social impacts may occur due to the resultant increased density in the area . L . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW . 43 . 21C , a declaration of non-significance has been issued for the subject proposal . This negative declaration is for the rezone only . Further development of the subject site will require additional environmental review pursuant to the SEPA . M . ADDITIONAL INFORMATION : A vicinity map and a site map are attached . N . AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED : 1 . City of Renton Building Division . 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division , 3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division . 4 . City of Renton Utilities Division . 5 . City of Renton Fire Department . 0 . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . An application for Comprehensive Plan amendment to low density multiple family residential . designation was referred to the Planning Commission for study and recommendation . However ,. the commission upon review of the application determined that the size of the parcel in question did not warrant Comprehensive Plan revision , but the zoning of the parcel can be reviewed by the Hearing Examiner . 2 . The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Element indicates single family residential . However , low density multiple family residential is designated for the area of the existing mobile home park . Given the fact that the Comprehensive Plan is a flexible document which does not contain precise boundaries , the extension of the mobile home park zoning may be considered . The question is the extent of such expansion and its overall compatibility with the purpose and intent of the Comprehensive Plan . 3 . It is clear from the map element of the Comprehensive Plan that single family residential land use was intended between the low density multiple family residential use and Union Avenue Northeast . However , it should be noted that the construction of the existing Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park , directly contiguous to the west boundary of the subject site , has changed the character of the area somewhat since the last areawide land use analysis (December 15 , 1969 ; Ordinance No . 2526 ) , and , therefore , has an effect on the planning and development of the site and surrounding area . 4 . The adjacent properties directly to the south and north contain existing single family residences . Such existing land use patterns must also be considered as part of a zoning amendment . (Comprehensive Plan Land Use Report , 1965 , Objectives No . 1 and 4 , page 17 . ) 5 . The proposed plan for mobile home park extension provides for 12 mobile home lots or approximately 5 dwelling units per acre . PLANNING DEPARTMENT " PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : DEAN W . BITNEY , FILE NUMBER R-179-78 JUNE 27 , 1978 PAGE FOUR If the property were platted into single family residential lots with a 50 foot residential access street , the total would be 10 lots or approximately 4 dwelling units per acre . 6 . It may be reasonable to consider the proposed rezone to "T" given the substantial change in land use in the area and the flexible interpretation of the Comprehensive Plan . (Comprehensive Plan Land Use Report , 1965 , Objective No . 6 , page 18 . ) However , it may also be reasonable to consider establishing a maximum density of 10 lots to provide consistency with the Comprehensive Plan Map Element and the existing single family residential land uses . 7 . To provide such rezoning to "T" and compatibility with both the single family uses to the north , south , and east , and the existing mobile home park to the west , it may also be appropriate to review where on the subject,-site the maximum 10 lots should be situated . Preferably the density should be less near Union Avenue Northeast to provide consistency with the Comprehensive Plan Map Element , the existing single family uses , and provide more entrance area landscaping and buffering . (Comprehensive Plan Land Use Report , Objectives No . 1 , 2 , and 4 . ) 8. A copy of suggested lot arrangements , and buffer areasAis attached . 9 . Various other municipal departments have reviewed the proposed rezone and indicated approval with comments . These are attached to this report . 10 . Existing streets and utilities are adequate for the proposed use . ( See attached comments from Traffic Engineering and Utilities Divisions . ) 11 . The significant evergreen and deciduous trees on the site should be preserved and integrated into site development as much as possible .. P . PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION : Recommend approval of rezone from "G" to "T" subject to ..the following conditions to be established as restrictive covenants : 1 . Maximum" site density shall be 10 mobile home lots preferably arranged similarly to the attached exhibit , subject to Planning Department review and approval . 2 . Trees shall be preserved as much as possible and incorporated into site design and development . No trees shall be removed without prior approval of the Planning Department . Detailed landscape plans for buffer areas , entrance areas , and individual lots shall be approved by the Planning Department . Trees and vegetation removed by site development shall be supplemented with additional suitable material . 3 . A minimum 15 foot natural/supplemental landscaped buffer shall be established along the north and south property lines . A _ minimum 30 foot natural/supplemental landscaped buffer shall be established along Union Avenue Northeast . 4 . No buildings , structures , or improvements other than landscaping together with the required screening fence shall be permitted within 30 feet of the east property line , within 15 feet of the south property line , and within 15 feet of the north property line . ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO: O Finance Department 8 Fire Department Library Department 0 Park Department Police Department Public Works Department 1---- GO Building Div. Engineering Div ` 0 Traffic Engineering Div .-- • ) Utilities Engineering Div.✓ FROM: . Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee) ._ f4tc-t4 1 5wl lT DATE : S/30 f 1()) PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR: 12- i 1el —71 REZON t?,." 'r MAJOR PLAT Uvux Cc -.To SITE APPROVAL SHORT PLAT SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT OR EXEMPTION AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE (0/(p1-7ii' REVIEW BY OTHER% CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : BLP6- Comments : A 5. ]:W.A1'0 C._ 6/42.4-1140 CIKA...---. .5-.... 3/-''2, Signatur Director or Aut orized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : CKp„/ge;wii Comments : • Kos% 5- 3/- 7e Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : ;Department : :Comments : No ,r ROO" • Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY 'OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: ;Department: T a '74; y. / it . Comments : .E,ris/i a c',/ (717/ S 14};1 c•2 v • • (2;2"- .7-702-4t.,1 V/' Signature of Director or Authorized Representative p Date REVIEW BY (OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : i1 atr-77 • IComments : /0G) S /6 /F/C A-4__1-7' 1 , )4 '.'l • /.� Signature of Director or'Authorized R• presentative Date /1 REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : • Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 1 'ROUTING FOR R.;VIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: O Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department . Police Department Public Works Department Building Div. Engineering Di'v. Traffic Engineering Div. Utilities Engineering Div. FROM: Planning Department, (signed by responsible official or his designee) ,I . M1L-b4I S 5,3o,rg SUBJECT Review of ECF- ; Appl ica.tion , No . : Action Name : W18,10 iC7.17JV Z.01.1L ) /2OM (i T? Please review the attached. Review requested by (date) : (af,7J Note : Responses to be written in ink. //// J • • REVIEW BY OTHER.. CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : gL1 Comments : .61 , 373/-7 Signature of ector or Authorized Representative Date • REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : ,,,,ee,rw-zr Comments : � J , /Di - / - 3i- 7, Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date I . I • REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : ,`a f : / .., l7/ie.-) ,C: ,Ji 4). Comments : y / ,r'. S Act,l• • Signature 'of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY ;OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : • (Comments : �v s1��/�j�� �t= ( • 1 I • //:7 (< 7,'(Te;Z/ Signature of Director or Authorize - Represen -ative 'ate • REVIEW BY 'OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : ,Department : Comments : • Signatureiof Director or Authorized Representative Date , REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : 1 • ,Signature 'of Director or Authorized Representative Date . •. , _-- ... --i--- ---:"---4jr. : k,;s7:, ...\. I . ry-17.7.1...._fl_.1 77 , .. 1 .,.._, ' _ •- , ': J ' Jr. ^ ..•. a : 1 -' '• I uiv 1".4.".•a 1 .1 il'... On ‘ ...s___41, ....mei, R-1 Ili IF"" - , , 1, A A• ..,0•C u:t./ ' • .4 •,.., '.c.Am Ili vo ii ( • ,1 e ----?, I .',,17,13'' • •....r.: 1""' .-... s'-...'." .'--'z' ,,-- •Mit . 1- m.a..0••••Pi.• s ,, ? ...6••,',..,Ps.. I 2---1-; --'t i' .,:•.•. -, ____ _ f 0" ii n ..,.... ......,, ,,T.,., -1. .• .0......, frg:-., = ,.,-rs , 1 j , , • . 1 •INM -r -1 ''. '-72 p .1...•_--/ -_•- — .2. ! .. A ,i N...,,,,.•P L. II a 6 4 1).-i--, ;1--°WC us 15 I+A ,:.• . C . .t, ,.."A L.Mili z • • : tumuli .---------ii-------1,1-14 BMW •• ' • ,,inua , I i 0+4F• L 4 liv6 ! , —... • . . a. 9. MO ,wa q1154•,2•2_,_.- 1.1..I.J.It;11.1 , , 1 I I,NI.OM 0 ii . 4 . .Pell. '' Val II • I II SR-1 , I * ;Angie. ENO DI ',Ells . ..,.._.1.. L Gs,i.____ lek,, :.. Dv( stk.•..1.111. . ; L---- ---I R-3.....4 i I i i i I ronclimMIIMIN 1 • kil- -'- •Krull- 1%— '''• • "7.6, 4,:%41 ,,F-'''';''*' 2 L..1 1 i ! , I I!' I . ' 4 • ' Ai ao c i T , , : 1 : - B-I. 1 '' , 'Mr 5 i I TN --r-,- -- ----- Kw - 'i- '•• I ,11 . •I!' GS-I 9L-_-s, ---'4 , ,/ i ./ , , , CENETERY , , • , .- ill --,1c2f1°-1 , 5 1 ' • 11 • .. . • L-I ,;(,/ , _ . • , ,_ 4.._:.. , ___________ __r_.• 1 __ ---i---- C D 1 I I - - I 1 1 .1_ ,••I I I. . 04 -- • • -- ...f......., , 7 / 1 i ,,1 l'\ . / ., - I /O/ ; ,, 1 • . . G ., . .I I IT : .. // • , ,, ,, • , ,, . . ; . , , , Su&SEC T 1 I I f ipj SITE 1 1 / 1 - 1 i I 41 ,..,/(0'/// • 1 ' I -1!..,...2_! 1 • 17,‹..1, . VI .1...L r, ± . ;• , .. I MD I I 1 ...1.. • 1 %el li / / I ' 1 I 1 . .. , • , , . _, • II _.... , I 41 46.44•1 Ika,11100. '' . i I , ' . ,, • 3 1 /1 i 1 • . , . , , • , • • I I . , , • 1.1,1.7',..;,-c-rr\,' 1 . ,, ', • . ' 1 , • I, .1 ', - i, a...1 ' . . • , , • I !;.... ‘, . . A . I ' 1 •. 1 • ' i . • • 4 . . . . • APPLICANT Dean W Sibley TOTAL AREA ± 0.1h:1u-es PRINCIPAL ACCESS Ka atiom litienve, SE: ,•'. EXISTING ZONING % o eotero.l C4ceCdf le e Dstrict' • • • . t . . •. • EXISTING USE Uttdeveiopect • PROPOSED USE ,Si 0,4. le_ at.,A;17 61013i/e Home Zbts . 0 ; 1 . COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Sinj le , ' COMMENTS . . . '] ; ;II , S.R. 13P AID gT. Itv. I ►01 , I ❑ i fp 05 1n ❑ICI i51�11 'i i- 11:0 a0 1( 1 Isl. (' 13( I-- I 4 .__.....,,I... 0.1 o I cox Is 'tit 1 I J ' �1sn 11.1 iii KVirt wee I.e► �9ree STArre �09 Mbr1.E �� f 0 ± 1 s.F �� 0- 41 bat ii:.:::::::::.x.x.x.x.:.i:i:iii I- s r El Cii . :::j :::.:::::: : ,.,.. .. . ¢ 3(861 . x�3r .. iu'. • RES.Oio 1y .' S.E. aNA PC. ►► poi , zis a plat C� ley gig kV Q2so 0 % D ,, ozs� p Q so0 1t o9 ;` O 300 0 , 3�0 5T. SE. o � ` 3042 0 ,„• o Qno • SCRLE rtz 200' I rip Sva MTT SITE---.. bEftN OITNEV RE2o/VE No, R-119-?8 I ' 9 • , - .. I. 1 - I •' ,• '{ S';rC ,�'t 4 r-y- 'Y,'.,ap.),,..•l-, • • ` • • �� .• i qo. • i 1 �j.: vl t "' 1.t:... n o/ co (moo.oo �• -'' 1! 7. • :` Y •;`••t• . •1,,', .t . ,''.-;•r7:c�:, e'. • T ' LEGEND ss' :,n 4 ' r x °;�.-�,�''+•�: J •� �� ♦ —WM Ad --.....C---- . ..e..„,.. -- -1.1- .1.Alt - -, - -v•• t , -` -�.. [-I lO Gt 1T1 :LINE < -�. r ,ice' f .. rn.'• All 1 S TO :,5 :: .; • •-.: :,-J.-:::... . ,,s • f ' i1ATUP)AL LAI'it .,CAPE /ice r'.'j;;,:,... .,t. „?t•. : ;ct{;:„ • I 1 f>�` , �2 MAN- PLAt^iTEI� LANDSCAPE v v x 3Cox(o4 COACH SIZE• • Y ;f` r,. ,:.: is.. f, c.:.1 \ iri,114 ' P. - • UI'IIT TABULATION- • IJJ = 20� 4U) / ` '' t{ N \ • TYPE t`JO. CO .r � �I MV M I ►I - I"iMEI`tI� • n / in. '. IaDU1�LE WIDE (A) GOx75 (MIh1 ) `� I / •` �,� ° TI'►IPLE WORE 12 CoOx 5Ot (AVG.) • X�� �, I Nisi `y V� --ma bdsx -t • i • ; . L• �j ' �.;/ .wIt r,, . ,......„ ,..48. I 4 1`189 OD �G W 165 80 ,k ;; - ► 7 ti" •• il • \ 1 '1 • al . 1I To SAVED N ,4 AC PAVEMENT- • ` o r ��• 0 • _ _ ?� ICIv lig . , • • . • _ I I 0 • • • .0 .‘> / -. w'r' P-. - • 3; tilt jA X '. .rLI.EURPgAP)P . (1 -,,,, .. , ,12-- i ___ i p , .. _ , , _ o I - ‘1 ,^ • . - c • • A "1 • --ri‘ ' _.-- ---- , \ . \ , \ 0 14 a \ • , 0 i r. -• / I \ , �(oxla8 A . 1 4 . . .,. 3: .. ,. 3. -,..... -,.., • • . ... .,..,•, , :: -_ ..r - I - \ •FI TneES • • _ 1111: — _ ti • • � ED \' f• --FIP)TP1EE'S \_ '�"; ,XoxCo . (.. r . • k. • k-^ . -‘1"11,114111PPIIIIIIW . • • • • ffl' _, ... • i r - -/ ,mot /� - ' ;+�M�',/I '�r �. __ JO" - • ' ` J . , • • `, •t1W/ •O' 542 LJ • ..� t5pl - .: v,. •4r7 . r: MAT1IhA LAM ast.:• • PROPOSED/FINAL '___LARATION 'OF SIGNIFICANCEi -A-SIGNIFICANCE Application No . R-179-78 0 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . 294-77 X❑ FINAL Declaration • Description of proposal Rezone from "G'! to• "T" • Proponent DEAN W. BITNEY Approximately 1000 feet south of NE 4th St . and Location of Proposal adjacent to Union Ave . NE and the existing Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park . Lead Agency Renton Planning Department This proposal has been determined to ❑ have ® not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS ❑ is 0 is not : required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was ma a after : review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . • Reasons for declaration of environmentalAsignificance : • This declaration is for rezone only . Any future development shall comply with applicable city standards . This declaration is further based on providing development which is compatible • with the single family residence area, and includes preservation • of the existing trees per approval of the Planning Department . . Measures , i,f any , that could be to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to suc.h an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : • • • • Responsible Official Gordon Y . Ericksen . Title Plan g ecto - Date June 20 , 1978 1.Signature —SiL/ l.4,0 • City of Renton Planning Department r� EIVE® .off of IIENTc XHI� r NO. 2 0, Renton Planning Commission _JUN2 71978 ITEM O. T; Public Hearing Meeting AM - PM ' : ! April 12 , 1978 7,819,10,11,121112131415,E Page Four ;4• '':.:, Noting no further public input, Chairman Walker recognized Commis- ,( L,.ii si oner Schel l ert , and IT WAS . - ACTION. . ' 1a, MOVED BY SCHELLERT,• SECONDED BY HANIS, THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING BE ..C ';'s CONTINUED UNTIL MAY 10, 1978. ;' +° Discussion among the Commissioners followed in which it was noted '} !� j�? that the Boeing Company did ' not anticipate submitting its comments S 1 until May -11th, the amount of study time required by the Goals and I?i Policies Committee to review all of the public input and to pre- 1 ;- pare an addendum of the changes responding to them, and the possi - ;f bility of continuing the public hearing again at the May meeting . "1;, On the question, MOTION CARRIED. vi` m, is Further 'brief discussion followed relative to ' the Policies Statement. Noting Comments made this evening regarding the relationship between ';' ';.1,1, the goals and policies and ordinances , Commissioner Teegarden sug- {"s gested that an opinion be obtained from the City Attorney. Chair- ; ;i ' man Walker reminded the Commission that there would be further opportunity for discussion regarding the statement following the ;' public hearing concerning the Dean W. Bitney application for Com- .HA prehensive Plan Amendment. 1 y s. NEW BUSINESS: . H * COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT: . ,1:.1 DEAN W. BITNEY ; Appl . ' CP-903-77r application for comprehensive land ;:i � use plan designation amendment from single family residential to low - 1 density ' multi -family residential ; property located as listed below: } PARCEL 1 : Approximately 2 . 4 acres between the existing Leisures .. • 1 Estates Mobile Home Park and Union Avenue S. E .' approximately 121 4 feet north of S . E . Second Place . ' . r .' ,:,,.s. PARCEL 2 : Approximately 10 acres located between the Bonneville dp: � Power .Administration transmission line easement and Union Avenue S . E . ti� �;; directly south of the existing Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park . -• !r ' Chairman Walker requested a review of the application from the Plan- ning Director. hi,g{ • i: 'A Mr. Ericksen noted that the applicant requests a change in the land i t, , use designation from single family residential to low density multi - , ., !:,:, .,-:J, family residential of two parcels--one approximately 10 acres and i'; ';,' the other approximately two acres--located in the vicinity of Union 4, i, Avenue S. E. adjacent to .�the existing Leisure. . Estates Mobile Home . Park . : He indicated,.,the •sites,. on the land use map , noted significant develop- `. N ment inithe vi.cinity, and discussed the character and land use •of the • area , former uses of the sites , vegetation on the property , access , - and proposed development in the vicinity. It was noted that the ; : current designation of the; Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park is' low L,.., density multi -family, which allows development of low density .apart- '.,'r,'''i ments , mobile home parks ,;rand. single family residential . Mr..: Erick- H,1. 'li sen then offered to respond to questions . ,,,,:.ltil i , ,,. Commissioner Teegarden requested clearer maps depicting the site and `'; proposal . These are forthcoming from the applicant. The ,,position of Commissioner Webb,' who lives/within one-half mile . of : i �4; the :subject sites , was reviewed as it relates to appearance of 'fair= , ;, „,; ness , .and it was decided that his opinion would not be affected by • t�H#: i t. The Chairman then, .cal led for a' presentation from the applicant . =i4i`'y 1. to• I; .f =il� Renton Planning Commission -E! . -Public Hearing Meeting April 12, 1978 ' Page Five • ll: H, David W,, Millard, Land Planning and Management , 22127 - 152nd S . E. , .;.I•1•• Kent, indicated his apology regarding the inadequacy of the pre- sentation documents this evening. He displayed a drawing of the d;; � lay-out ;of existing Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park and noted the 't.• relationship to it of the two parcels requested for a change in the ). :.• Comprehensive Plan land use designation . Mr. Millard noted plans •'v;• ;' " . , for development-- 12 lots , 64 feet wide , for triple-wide units on '',IOW:. the approximate two acre site and single family residential lots ..1- - on approximately one acre of the front portion (along Union Avenue 'A.: ' S. E . ) of the approximate ten acre site and mobile home expansion 7.I .> on the approximate .nine acres to the rear of the parcel . Proposed ',` : ' buffering from neighboring properties was discussed, and landscaping :';' `,yy�;•:• plans were noted . "'i';fig' i ;=�' Questions from the Commission followed . Commissioner Webb inquired = 1'n . 7:• about the proposed development as it relates to the low density 4;Ii .,• multi -family development and was advised by Mr. Millard that the ^� :- intent i;s to allow for construction of a mobile home park similar I ;',, to the existing Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park. Discussion r11 ensued regarding provisions of the low density multi -family designa- ii•,3. tion and the need for study of the request bythe Commission . iA . Dean Bitney, 1082 Anacortes N . E . , Renton , indicated his. intention ,- A • to request a "T" ( trailer park ) zone . •.Oa. } FY fu I , pj; It was noted by the Planning Director that the request for zoning • L; ; follows a. change in the Comprehensive Plan designation and requires �1,N, .'; Hearing Examiner review. He discussed the relationship between the -:• ,, density ,of mobile ho•me. ,park •construction and the low density multi - ::,�;,, family category and noted that mob,i l e• home park use is a special i;'� permit process in the multiple zone . I. '� Mr . Bitneythen discussed the: details of his„ : proposed mobile home i.f` .. park development, noting average size and values of the units , pro- posed;k+:'R„•. ,; i ,,. buffering from adjacent properties , and planned density. He ,`(I .� • noted colnversion from agravel pit and control of current recreational P �' P ;1 vehicle use in the area . i=' x�: - A recess: was declared at 9 : 20, p. m. by the Chairman . The meeting w1, was resumed at 9 : 25 p . m. with all members noted above in attendance . P } :�•.4,' Chairman, Walker introduced newly appointed Commissioner Michael ''I'�< Porter. ' Commissioner Porter noted. previous experience with the ,I '• Commission as a member of the audience on an issue several years Hd ; ago and is interested in becoming involved in the Commission ' s i I• activities . '�,:;; . ' . The Chairman then invited comment from the audience . II..T° ,f. .., Don Greenwalt , 4203 3rd Place S . E . , noted the need for two accesses '` ' to the park and increased traffic and congestion on Union . He also • ,1 t.. ex ressed concern re arding y a otential emer enc while the road- . . 11 4I' ' way is blocked when moving in mobile home units . 11 Glen Koppelman , 4400 S . E . 3rd Place , indicated his concern regarding the low density multi -family designation and requested some kind of : 0 . . guarantee that developmentwouldbe as proposed . Mr. Koppelman also : '1 L. expressed his concern regarding additional traffic on Union Avenue , �� !' noting the proposed additional development of single family homes gii • - on approximately 20 acres to the north of Heather Downs and about ' • ' 40 additional homes anticipated in Heather Downs upon installation ; ,',1 • • of sewers . The condition of the roadway was discussed , and the 1,_ ;._:. need for: turn lanes and sidewalks in the . interest of safety was • != : noted. Mr. • Koppelman also cited the dangerous intersection at ' Union and N . E. 4th . • ,'�* '• •' Further discussion ensued among 'the Commissioners and . staff gard I tn� �. �CJ a�. ��') ;' " ing the low density multi -family •designation , possible zoning�cate- .('R .' , cares , future development proposals , and the review process . rC..a l 7 L . i;1 " Renton Planning Commission _'1' 4 Public Hearing Meeting . 1,, April 12, 19178 !lI Page Six 1 i yJi i ' '+'X Mr. Bitney noted the transitory nature of the congestion problem _< ..; created by the movement of mobile, home units into the park ; plans 1,1s for traffic control within the park and at the access point, when ,G. the development is complete; the use of the second access for j A emergency only; greater security provided residents by limited ;;; 1.;� access ; and the number and type of residents and their life-styles . '' '' Mr. Bitney acknowledged the concern of the neighborhood regarding .4_;.. possible apartment development and offered to provide restrictive , I, covenants to run with the land limiting the development to a mobile " home park . 0I "" Mrs . Doni Greenwalt , 4203 S . E . 3rd Place, Renton , expressed concern ' '3 regardin'g extra traffic on Union Avenue and inquired regarding ;H. F, possible, use of the second access for regular traffic. She also a ' ,;1 :. asked about any plans for improvement of Union. Avenue . w i,1 a! The Planning Director indicated that the matter of access is a `; u,;'. Comprehensive Plan concern and suggested the review of the Arterial '.;.t4. Street Plan in the Commission ' s study . '''i Mrs . Greenwalt also inquired regarding sewer plans for the proposed mobile home park . ; z . The Chairman advised that the sewer question would be reviewed by ',' the study committee , including the matter of utility services in t '.1 terms of! density. • .1,1 Newton Ellifrits , 4218 S. E . 3rd Place , indicated that he objects ects to u- multi -family development but would not oppose a mobile homepa'k . ,, Mr. Millard responded to concerns .regarding density , indicating it ; I :, would beislightly higher than single family residential development, : , ,. . and stated that Mr. Bitney has no intention of constructing duplexes. • or four-plexes on the property. He offered to do a traffic study `'•1'F : on UnioniAvenue and discussed approaches to providing utility iI1„ services • 1 .!,,;F. Noting no further public comment, the Chairman asked for the plea- " '' sure of the Commission. IT WAS i' ; ACTION: s ;;' MOVED BYITEEGARDEN, SECONDED BY SCHELLERT, THAT THE DEAN W. BITNEY ;`II AMENDMENT BE REF w Z,-,I �, APPLICATION FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLANERRED TO T_.•E -,-' at COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMITTEE" FOR STUDY AND REPORT BACK AT THE : I'; . NEXT MEETING OF MAY 10, 1978. MOTION CARRIED. �;�;' Commissioner Teegarden , Chairman of the Comprehensive Planning ' i' Committee , advised that the committee will meet next on April 19, ,,, 1978, at ; 7: 30 p. m. and will discuss Mr. B•i i.rtey ' s request. Inter- 1 ',;i I1, ested parties were invited to attend. ' ' 6- ADMINISTRATIVE: . �� '` A. COMMITTEE REPORTS �'''1 1 . GOALS AND POLICIES COMMITTEE •,. Chairman Walker appointed Commissioner Porter to serve on "''`'' the Goals and Policies Committee. She invited . further ,, , discussion regarding the Policies Element from the Commis- sion, but none was offered. ' ' '' ' 2 . ORDINANCE DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE -.j n ,'� " Commissioner Webb reported that the committee had met on l,' '" March 23rd and Ap ril p ri1 11th and have almost completed their ;: first review of the Zoning Code . It is expected that . .,-,); .. portions of the proposed revision will be submitted for i ' , .1t! .';¢�:r 6'�k'. .kv r"'s ;h :i r.,.,.";;•' - _ L - - ;a„. ,.. � �'L�rc+s'i'1:S'x::F1'ix .{-?-�.�:a.?�e,,..-'•:ii:;kd'v:,l::tiv:k,'tta.,iLe,,eori,iwrl&::v5.e•, 5 ...e-'__'_ __ COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMITTEE REPORT May 9, 1978 TO: Planning Commission Members FROM:. Clark Teegarden, Chairman Comprehensive Planning Committee RE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment Request Dean W. Bitney, File No. CP-903-77 • I INTRODu CTION': The above noted request was referred to the Comprehensive Planning Committee for study 'ard recommendation. The property in question is located in the • southeast Highlands area adjacent to the existing Leisure Estates Mobile Home park and adjacent to Heather Downs . The Committee, while considering the expansion request, undertook a review of the area on a more comprehensive basis in order to realistically address the amendment request. The Committee reviewed the , area and held four committee meetings and a field trip of the area . The matters of land use , traffic circulation , including pedestrian and vehicular, utility service to the area including sanitary sewers and water, storm run-off, street conditions and the growth potential were reviewed in some detail . For the purposes of the committee ' s deliberations , the Comprehensive Plan is defined as the official statement of the City of Renton establishing major policies concerning desirable future development. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - DEFINITION AND PURPOSE :. The Comprehensive Plan consists of the Goals , Objectives , and Policies ; Land Use Element; Circulation Element ; Community Facilities Element; and Definitions Proposed developments should be reviewed against the Comprehensive Plan to insure that growth is consistent with the Plan . The purpose of the Comprehensive Plan are : • To improve the physical and social environment of the city as a ,setting for human activities - to make it more functional , beautiful , decent, healthful , interesting , and efficient ; --�.�- -.--.a.-r-.-�.�._.-w-.t—.•�s�o.^•^veK. (+vacai=`?�'e � +Ya.4•w ___— _____ _ • ,......tea..•.- ,:I'_ ... , ..z._,....,:.,.,,.._,.,..._x,,.4,.:f-..:c.i.,..-.-. b,....,..,: ,;,,.r..,. id,', w,.,....1'IS':u t.. - aLt 1 t,1.:,.u.,,,,,.u'I�C,. , ,,..,. ,a. r.a•U, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMITTEE REPORT •/ MAY 9, 1978 PAGE TWO . • • To promote the public interest, the interest of the city at large as well as the interests of individuals or special groups; • • To facilitate the democratic determination and implementation of city policies on development; • • • • To• effect political and technical coordination in develop- ment; • •• To inject long-range considerations into the determination of short-range actions; and • To bring professional and technical knowledge to bear on the making of political decisions on the development of the city. The Comprehensive Plan is intended to serve as a guide to help resolve . some of the development problems confronting municipal officials and the people they represent. The Plan takes into account existing con- ditions and future needs, and attempts to express the best reasonable consensus •that can be achieved at a given time as to the character and direction of future growth. The Plan is of necessity general -in its proposals. It must be flexible, since it is impossible to predict all future events which may affect the community. The Plan is not` a zoning ordinance,' although it makes significant recommendations for future land use. The Plan is not pre- cise. It does not represent engineering accuracy, nor does it claim to predict exactly the future use of every parcel of property, or insure that growth is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. • In order for the Plan to maintain effectiveness, it should be reviewed periodically. Conditions might change and unforeseen events may Occur which might necessitate a re-evaluation. ANALYSIS: 1. Initially, the committee, in reviewing 'the request, determined that ,the small two acre parcel located at the entrance of the existing mobile home park was not a comprehensive plan question, but basically one of zoning and should therefore be reviewed by the Hearing Examiner. • 2. The larger parcel of land located south. of the mobile home park is a comprehensive plan question and was reviewed on a compre- hensive basis. With reference to said parcel, the committee determined that: �[�6 ;L, ,d, .. ., .: .,��.�x�-.4}:..,p„.c,.,...as.,,.a.,'lF-11., .g�kc:E .,...-'.i� .e'l:;a41':, �Sm a�' :• �tdJi:.:,.i.,.:: r-:,:�:��'...v,Lu+:.::.:,six•.ir`•:.,[.;�:,.•, - ,i ! ,�. : ...,,.. S6ffui,h-,.`tiat9 ra,.rAE „'.�;:;cr:;'r',Cd'.�Y•;;u,:i:7!t ,:�..�..., —.._`G<,.1�,i.:.,.,,-�,saw:!�<i.:,,;:.....cJ.s-:.,�.,a.u�..,..y.,,.. ,,. . ,,. --:._.,d_..-- ^• : -;"COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMITTEE REPORT : " ' • MAY 9, 1978 . . . PAGE THREE : . • A. Land Use Element: The low density multi-family designation on the land use plan was predicated on the power line easement serving as a buffer between a more intensive use to the west and the less intensive use to the east ' • • providing a transitional area from high density multiple to single family residential. The original development of the low density multi family area was predicated on the provision of additional access to service the area. Such access, however, has been limited through the zoning action ' to emergency use only. • B. Circulation: Access to the area southerly. of Northeast 4th Street is via Union Avenue Northeast. Said access • presently constitutes a cul-de-sac situation serving all i.::; • of the development and population tributary to Union Avenue. t ,` . Residents in the area expressed concern with regard to the matter of increased traffic and also pedestrian access in the area. These matters were investigated by the committee and it was noted that, while Union Avenue N.E. has adequate capacity congestion occurs during peak hours of traffic at the intersection of Northeast 4th Street and Union Avenue. The street is basically a two-lane blacktop road with' limited shoulders that are presently used as pedestrian walkways. The road itself is located in both the city and county, and improvements are limited to basic maintenance and operation.. The up-grade of Union Avenue is not proposed . in the present six year street program. The committee reviewed the alternative possibilities for improvement of the circulation system by setting aside • -! potential rights-of-way for street development. The com- mittee concluded that the existing arterial street plan, while logical at its time of formulation, cannot be developed 'in the manner as published due to new development that has occurred.. It appears, therefore, that a future connection from Union Avenue N.E. to 138th and beyond may be the only practical answer to the present cul-de-sac situation. The alternative would be the provision of additional access • from N.E. 4th Street along the power line right-of-way. C:. Utilities: The committee investigated both the matter of sanitary sewers and storm water run-off. In either case the requested expansion of the mobile home park would not impact existing development since facilities serving said development could be expanded to meet the needs. The committee, while recognizing the need for an expansion of sanitary sewers to the area, did not feel this was a major deterent to development. ' GW ': I1i iaPREHEDSIVE PLANNINc,��M1ITTEE REPORT. ' AY 9, 1978 PAGE FOUR , fl D. Community Facilities: It should be recognized that =ijA there are no public park facilities in the vicinity of ''"1 '' the proposed development or in the Heather Downs area. ..1,,1==5. The nearest playground available is at the Kiwanis ,:1'3 Park, the Honeydew Elementary School, or the Maplewood Heights Elementary School. rs .: ,.; The comprehensive park and recreation plan, recently I. adopted by the City Council, does include the proposed ,.s acquisition of ten acres to be used as a play field in °`�j the Heather Downs area. Potential development of the �� area north of Heather Downs increases the need for a additional neighborhood facilities in order that the !i4, residents can avoid travelingconsiderable distances `dl,:<,, to use facilities. ' ,; ;1 RECOMMENDATIONS: "' JH Based on the above information, the committee recommends as follows: j,j'. Land Use: • i.i ',I,Ci ', 1. 'Review of the two acre parcel is not a Comprehensive Plan question. 1-, ,1 The 'request should therefore be submitted to the Hearing Examiner 4 .y° for ,consideration. : ; 2. The '!requested southerly expansion of the low density multiple family area is not recommended at this time due to the limited ;HI.;,; access and the growth problems which are impacting the Heather Downs area. "''° 3. The 'committee, at the conclusion of the southeast area studies, ic.:J,li ' will reinitiate' studies of the Highlands area in view of updating ' :;' the Comprehensive Plan for-the northeast segment of the city. ,;9'fx, P 1+. Facilities: , • ,,isj.i.; •' • 1. Acquistion of a park/playground site (minimum ten acres) in the ''I Heather Downs ,vicinity as recommended in the Comprehensive Park .' 15. Plan,. Said park should be so located as to provide a' continu- ,:f ation of the greenbelt-ravine area. Yrik ', `} • Circulation: `; .,Sri,: ri '' 1. It should be noted that development even at a single family ti'j1 :N • ;';uiw. residential density will compound the existing circulation A4$• problem on Union Avenue and in the Heather Downs area. Steps ;,� z� should be taken to improve the existing circulation system to ";'q provide the area with an alternate means of access. ri ) x. 2. The committee recommends that additional study of this area be undertaken at such time as the Comprehensive Plan review of the l''i, Highlands area is reinitiated. ': ];':4,- . . - r,, . d'a I.1 4 • • • • • • _ T. : • ' ' • I(4tW L TO ' MAXINE SOON AS POSSIBLE I , JENNIFER i TODAY SHARLENE THIS WEEK - (day ) FRANCIE THIS MONTH BY . ( date or RE : ,,Ppeu6,/ " i A! PLEASE FILE ( FILE # : O SET UP FILE : ` REVIEW & REPORT BACK TO ME 1 ROUTE & RETURN PREPARE RESPONSE FOR MY SIGNATURE I I DISTRIBUTE COPIES TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION SET UP MEETING FOR YOUR INFORMATION t—_ PLEASE SEE ME 1,114 \ p \ z T . , 1EL OF o THE CITY OF RENTON `$ ® MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 oNA IMESrn CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 90 �. 235-2550 0,9gr�D SEPI����P MEMORANDUM November 13 , 1978 TO : Del Mead , City Clerk FROM: Planning Department RE : DEAN BITNEY REZONE , R-179-78 ( PROPOSED ORDINANCE ) The subject proposed ordinance has been reviewed for accuracy , and there is an error in the recording number of the restrictive covenants , as noted on page two . The number should correctly read 7810061020 . Attached are the legal description , Exhibit A , which has been confirmed as accurate by the Engineering Division , and a site map for inclusion with the ordinance . Note : Attached also is a copy of the Declaration of Restrictive Covenants , which you may also want to include with the ordinance . wr Attachments • • SPEED LETTER TO: aa_ fke-ct,fe i`IL O�Z fc, ..d DATE: 7/'!7—7 C/wlc_ CiZe e(9Gu.,-6L PROJECT: SUBJECR �.2 /�-i7� 7F e_-e__e¢gi-L-et47 ,e,-1.(_e.e.t,t/ # s/e9 / 0; Dat-e,e-e -c--AZ", G-P.2' 41 (Signed) 7"1 21 Dean Bitpey Rezone Renton Hill - Phase II . INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO : Planning Dept. DATE : 11-7-78 FROM: Del Mead, City Clerk RE : Ordinances musiatimpgdootdoulx We attach Ryogsxjaigt4mitikumattm Ordinance (s) which have been prepared by the City Attorney. Please verify content , legals , description and general location of the improvements and return to this office for further processing and presentation to the Legislation Committee . Please also attach Exhibits ' . • SPEED LETTER TO: ott hce.,ced l2 e ,.) DATE: // —7 e Gti-6,PROJECT: SUBJECT dies"- 6-(1:1? 79- 7 ' -- gi p, f -7 g/0 ® a . ,r)(92—e_zetzi"1- ( 1!4t4ye-- (Signed) • OF RSA t$ OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY• RENTON,WASHINGTON _ POST OFFICE 80X 626 100 2nd AVENUE BUILDING • RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 255-8678 Z o LAWRENCE I.WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY 9,0 co' 09gT�D sEP-c°°�P November 6 , 1978 MEMORANDUM TO: Del Mead, City Clerk FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Re : Dean Bitney Rezone Ordinance Dear Del: Enclosed please find the original of a proposed Ordinance as thove captioned. Please attach the lega escription. Lawrence J. arren LJW:nd Encl. cc: Ways and Means Committee Planning Department Mayor Council President OF R4. ~' trio!, a y OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY o.RENTON,WASHINGTON ®®!; �- z _ POST OFFICE BOX 626 100 2nd AVENUE BUILDING • RENTON.WASHINGTON 98055 255-8678 •®. , ti °' LAWRENCE I.WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY 09gTeD sEP1°°�Q- November 6, 1978 MEMORANDUM TO: Del Mead, City Clerk FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Re: Dean Bitney Rezone Ordinance Dear Del: Enclosed please find the original of a proposed Ordinance as thove captioned. Please attach the legal description. Lawrence J. Warren LJW:nd Encl. cc: Ways and Means Committee Planning Department Mayor Council President RECEII/to NOV 8 1918 1Y. ,+ CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON. ORDINANCE NO. . AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM GENERAL CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT"-(G) TO TRAILER PARK (T) . (R-179-78 ) WHEREAS under Chapter 7, Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton" , as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as General ClaRification District (G) ; - and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been. filed with the Planning Department on or about May 30, 1978 which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about June 27 , 1978 , and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: ' SECTION I: The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Trailer Park (T) as hereinbelow specified; subject to the findings, conclusions and decision dated October 12 , 1978 of the City' s Hearing Examiner;the Planning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: . 3J -1- As per Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth J (Said property located approximately 1000 feet south of N. E. 4th Street and adjacent to Union Avenue S.E . and the existing Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park) AND SUBJECT FURTHER to that certain Declaration of Restrictive Covenants executed by Petitioner-owners on or about September 29 , 1978 and recorded in the office of the Director of Records and 7Y`ooC,odo Elections, Receiving No. 8-144 n4-1nn8 and which said Covenants are hereby incorporated and made a part hereof as if fully set forth. SECTION II : This Ordinance shall be effective upon • its passage, approval and five ( 5) days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of November , 1978 . • Delores A. Mead, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of November, 1978 . • Charles J. Delaurenti, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: • • R-179-78 Page Three FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The request is for approval of a reclassification of 2.4 acres from G to T in order to permit expansion of the existing Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park. 2. The Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues, applicable policies and provisions, findings of fact, and departmental recommendations in this matter , and is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference as set forth in full therein. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended by R.C.W. 43.21.C. , a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development and no adverse comment was expressed. 5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 6. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. 7. Section 4-714 (T-Trailer Parks) requires that the mobile home park zone be located in ". . .low, medium and high density multifamily residential and commercial areas as designated on the city's Comprehensive Land Use Plan." The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map indicates the subject site to potentially be Low Density Multiple Residential (revised per Ordinance No. 3253) (Section 4-3014. (B) ) . 8. The last area land use analysis occurred on September 18, 1978 (Ordinance No. 3253) . This ordinance amended the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map to Low Density Multifamily for the subject site (Section 4-3014. (A) ) . Restrictive covenants limiting use of the property to those uses in the T zone were submitted by the applicant. 9. Directly abutting the north and south boundaries of the site are single family residences. Currently the subject site is used for the landscaped and only continual access to the existing Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park. The site contains several significant trees which tend to buffer the adjacent single family residences from the Mobile Home Park and its access. , Easterly and across Union Avenue S.E. is property also zoned G, single family. 10. Improvements have not occurred since the recent Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map change on October 2, 1978 (Section 4-3014. (C) ) . CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proposal conforms to the Comprehensive Plan (Section 4-3014. (B) ) . However, due to the abutting single family (G) properties, some transition may be appropriate (Objectives #1, 4 and 6, pages 17 and 18, Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Report, July, 1965) . Section 4-2006.1.G (Mobile Home Park) permits a maximum density of 8 units per acre which is approximately double the density allowable (approximately 4 units per acre) under the existing G zoning. Therefore, the allowable T density constitutes an incompatible use and disorderly growth pattern unless some transition is provided to buffer such density from existing single family. Section 4-2003.1.C. (Mobile Home Park) provides the Examiner in review of the site plan for a mobile home park with the authority to approve a development of lesser density and other conditions deemed appropriate due to the circumstances surrounding the site. Therefore, it appears premature in the consideration of the rezone to establish density. It would be more appropriate to decide upon density in response to and upon review of a specific site plan. 2. The City Council in its deliberations regarding changing the Comprehensive Plan from Single Family to Low Density Multifamily Residential (Ordinance No. 3253) clearly considered the proposed reclassification of the property to T (Mobile Home Park) . Restrictive covenants were submitted (and completed by the applicant) covenanting the property to only mobile home park uses. Because the rezone was considered by the Council, Section 4-3014. (A) does not apply to the proposed reclassification. 3. Since significant improvements have not occurred in the area since the,passage of Ordinance No. 3253, Section 4-3014. (C) does not apply. 4. Mitigation of impacts associated with the rezone to T can satisfactorily occur in • • R-179-78 Page Four the Examiner's review of the site plan per Section 4-2003.1.C. The conceptual site plan (Exhibit #3) submitted in the public hearing concerning the rezone was not intended for this review and could not be since it was not the subject of that. ' • hearing. Until the site plan is finally approved, it is reasonable to require that existing vegetation not be removed in order to retain transition flexibility. 5. Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park and the conceptual site 'plan (Exhibit #3) indicate that the intended development on the subject site will appear quite similar to a traditional single family development. Extension of Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park is an acceptable development adjacent to' existing tranditional single family residences. The T zone is an "appropriate land use" (Summary, page 9, Comprehensive Plan, Renton Urban Area, July, 1965) on this property. RECOMMENDATION: • • Based upon the record, testimony, findings and conclusions, it is the Examiner's recommendation that the City Council approve the requested reclassification from G to T subject to retention of existing vegetation until the final site plan is approved by the Examiner. ORDERED THIS 12th' day of October, 1978. e er Land Use Hearing .Examiner • TRANSMITTED THIS 12th day of October, 1978 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: • David R. Millard, Land Planning & Management, 22617 152nd S.E. , Kent, WA 98031 Dean W. Bitney, 108 Factory Avenue N. , Renton, WA 98055 Bernice Postlewait, 121 Union Avenue S.E. , Renton, WA 98055 TRANSMITTED THIS 12th- day of October, 1978 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Councilwoman Patricia Seymour-Thorpe Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Ron Nelson, Building Division . Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title. IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before October 26, 1978. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could .not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is 'governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the City Clerk's office, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in said office. October 12, 1978 • OFFICE OF T}IE LAND USE HEARD EXAMINER ' CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE ,RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICANT: Dean W. Bitney FILE NO. R-179-78 ' .LOCATION: 1000 .Approximately feet .south,of N.E: 4th:Street and adjacent. to Union Avenue 'S:E.. and the existing'Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests approval-Of a rezone from "G," General Classification District," to "T," "Trailer Park," which is • the city''s designation for mobile home park zone. Approval of the request will, permit expansion of the existing Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park. The preliminary plan approval process established in Chapter 20, Mobile Home Parks, will apply to specific,site development. . . SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Recommend approval with restrictive RECOMMENDATION: ' covenants. . • Hearing Examiner: Recommend approval with restrictive ' covenants. ' PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department staff report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on June •22, 1978. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining ' available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, ,the . ' Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on June 27, 1978 at 9:05 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. . .The Examiner inquired if the applicant or his representative had received and reviewed ' . the Planning Department report. Mr. David R. Millard, representing the applicant, indicated although he had received the report this morning, he expressed willingness to proceed with • the hearing. The Examiner labeled the report as Exhibit #1. Michael Smith, Planning Department, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional exhibits into.the record: . • Exhibit #2: King County Assessor's Map Exhibit #3: Conceptual Site Plan Referencing Section 0.8, Mr. Smith noted that copies of suggested setbacks are included and , attached to Exhibit #1 as well as suggested lot arrangements and buffer areas. He also added a requirement for review of the site plan by the Hearing Examiner to Section P.1. The Examiner asked the representative for the applicant if he concurred in Exhibit #1. Responding was: . David R. Millard ' Land Planning & Management ' 22617 152nd S.E. ' ' Kent, WA 98031 Mr. Millard reported that because Mr. Bitney is out of town' he had not' reviewed the Planning Department report, but as his representative he, advised that certain portions of the report were not acceptable. . He stated that a verbal agreement had been 'made with, ' ' Mrs. Postlewait, neighbor to the northeast of the subject site,, to retain large trees; and' the design of the fence on the southern boundary had allowed retention of existing vegetation and trees. Mr. Millard reported that every effort had been expended to assure mitigation of impact to vegetation on the site. Referring to Exhibit #3, Mr. Millard reported that the intent in submittal of the plan had been for- conceptual purposes and not as a final site plan configuration. He .advised concurrence in recommendations contained in Sections 'P.3 and P.4 although he noted that R-179-78 Page Two • requirements differ, from those established during review and approval by the Planning Commission and Planning Department of the original Leisure Estates Master Plan. Mr. Millard also objected to the establishment of density of 10 lots on. the site, noting that the maximum allowable density according to ordinance is a total of 20 lots for the subject site. He emphasized that the site is an extension of the existing mobile home park and not a single family residential area and should be allowed certain flexibility in design and density. He suggested that the technical aspects of the application such as density, setbacks and buffers be reviewed with the Planning Department prior to site plan approval and not included as part of the review of the, rezone application. • • • The Examiner inquired if 'Mr. Millard wished to comment regarding Compliance of the proposal with, the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Millard reported that the Planning Commission had deferred review of the request to the Hearing Examiner because of the minimal size ' of the parcel and they felt that a change in the, Comprehensive Plan was not warranted. He noted that an expansion of the existing T zone was compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and utilization of the Mobile Home Park Ordinance would occur during review of the request. The Examiner requested further testimony in support of the application. Responding was: Bernice Postlewait 121 Union Avenue S.E. Renton, WA 98055 Mrs. Postlewait indicated her concurrence in the request, noting sale of the property by her to the applicant for the purpose of mobile home park development. The Examiner requested testimony in opposition to -the request. There was no response. He then requested comments from Mr. Smith. Mr. Smith clarified the density requirements of the Mobile Home Park Ordinance of 8 units per acre, and advised that the subject property had not been included during prior review and approval of the Leisure Estates Master Plana He stated that the Planning Commission had concluded that the small parcel should be reviewed by the Hearing Examiner rather than' amending the Comprehensive Plan, and noted that the Planning Department •had approved the request with certain stipulations. The Examiner inquired regarding the date of the Planning Commission meeting during which the subject had been reviewed. Mr. Smith indicated that the meeting had occurred on April 12, 1978, and that. a copy of the minutes would be supplied to the Examiner. The minutes were entered into the record as Exhibit #4 by the Examiner. • The Examiner requested clarification from Mr. Millard regarding the conceptual site plan, Exhibit #3. Mr. Millard confirmed that the plan was submitted to the Planning Department for conceptual purposes only and that the applicant did not wish-to be confined to the conceptual configuration. • The Examiner referenced Section 0.7 of Exhibit #1, and requested clarification of requirements for reduction of density near Union Avenue S.E. ' Mr. Smith explained the purpose to. provide compatibility with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan relative to • single family and multiple family residential areas as well as requirements for setbacks, buffers and density. The Examiner noted a prior requirement during development of Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park that the site would not be cleared until a final 'site plan, is approved, and inquired if the requirement was acceptable to Mr. Millard for the subject application. Mr. Millard indicated his concurrence in the request, and inquired about flexibility of density requirements during review. Mr. Smith reviewed density ranges in various single family zoning designations, and noted that the subject site would allow a density range from 3 to 5 lots per acre. Mr. Millard inquired if the requested 12 units would be compatible with the elements of the Comprehensive Plan within the 2.4 acre site. Mr. Smith indicated that a maximum of 10 lots had been determined. allowable during platting of the site in accordance with the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance. The Examiner inquired if the Traffic Engineering Division' and the Public Works Department had approved the existing roadway for access to the subject site. Mr. Smith responded that approval had been received through departmental comments. • The Examiner requested further comments. Since there were none, the hearing on File No. R-179-78 was closed by the Examiner 'at 9:45 a.m. . i',':-:',"'•,:1,,L1', '4 '' ""''.''''''. , 9 ..1.44•••• ... L2-f..... --. . 1.1..0 . • Ra.. ... „elf- \,,. • ... .. .,-/ i' le. '. i 7 1 9A r L • „ -_ , \t, • .4,. .1. , , . ........ .... ..'1'4. . • • , , ) I r. ' L , • , •'"'T ' 0 / . .e., •T __-:- i_- n . , , -;-i-s. •... _.,. ,0 . • z B-I , ____ • _ _____ , _. , 1 ; . ...• ____ J b __ . _ At :•' •.... 4 L'I-- ' ..... . ,, .... ---- I 7 i - 4 GREENWOOD ' -L-. ,IiiiME-JO G ,, II , ,, , CEMETLRY : I, I 1 Plitl , I / / 1.6 -. ow 1 ib ' iii,i / - - i /.c‘,/ I 1 r • I . ., I ,1 I . e)/ I i • /44' ! ICID 1 ,. ti 1 t - • 1 i 1 1 . .. / • -—--.-- .11 1 • _____4' - 1' ; t/ . • , —.-- 1 .' •' 1 ----1----i 1 , 1 , 1 i G , ___„______=,, , , , , T _ , 1 , , , . • i, /At' 2.4 Ae,„..t. 1 i---'•, , . . • WM Nit " : 1 • . ' .•41. 4 i•la ie ? • '' I : ' t • .'' ....,!,1'. ...•#." IX • . WI"0 IIIIMMIIP111111...11.1.1.1"11L 1 : /°AC 21, :".-o.-I.-.11/iE• e•-"" ' ..‘.•• . • ', 1 " T. b , . - •, •,-t, ;• ._. , ,... .,. • •i. t . .. 0. . 0 I , C, 0. •"'' 0"'L.L. I . •. ..•,:''. I I , - I % \ % igr L \, I r-TJ \. ,.. N LAKE $• N';%:• '': ....,„----....., : .. -,,,:,=-•• WA SH I NG TON l ri ., .IP-4.2..aUta.-..' 7. -e•golllatl t r.,..-1, _..1 -. -!, ..., .._...- 1:i:f..:, ,.:IPA.. Ilirlitelpra cite: Floimim-- 4.' M.—. ....4... .. ---N-71 t_ t-: _._ \ ,, -.- -.,1: ., ; --- :' .....* ‘__-__-. • , , ::....-=-..., l, \, `:„. /t.t: .., swill r—.-• ,,. i i )7'; • 'll Ill.*: il —, 1 i .... il . : ,, 111 TN— : .. di; es i 2 ! .-r-1 1 e s--• ,,.. ".......}. I.,N,__, I . ...--- . 4111111 7- i '...; '---..rs' .: '. 1 t 1111111 IMPIRSEb.. CM ' _. , , ,/ • 1:-.'.'' ,..,...;- -,--, , ,'._jz.':1') 'i••- I". Itiiimir 41 ._. .rS TUDY AREA1 - - . i/, • - i'caumt li 0"' • -441111E11116-1.01irdili ItittP4r 4% I ". _-...--- ,/,• - ----,,, , , ..... ipa Prin--v , )-4,1 1 • • N -,...„-- ge Ansislastul •, -----____•'.t .4 -• i my, i‘ _ I\ ---A. I : ..11::::::.:::::::::•'::•.•:. . -011:011111111;1_ ...,_ . ........„ .. - . .•••••••• .. alipri I -...,____ ..‘* .,. 14 I ag _..,, '" I ' Rh •-_,.. . _ ..... ••••"."4---- migyip I EL . ____! .... "•-s,,. 2:.•:::::::•:•:•:-:: i - -- -- II '' , -. ..........q. ...,E,,,, : • -- •,, ) -- :s ••4A,t.:..' 41010"-In .. ........ ...... ..Or lid... . :.::...652a...ir I "1"... .0", ..........:.:.:-:-:.:-:.:•::::::::::::::::1 -, \ ,, , — ,_,,, r ..... i li.. Air \ i - --, `IV .z; ..: . ,.__.,1 ,.........,z:,:::.:•:.:.:.::::•:-:-...:.:., „_....____________ __ - - ---- - - - , • Illuar at • , , to.....,... •:: 4 1 '. ---1 ...............- i„.....1 ; r.:::.::.,..:•:.y.r, 715 , ngg)..rrms (ra Ka . ,,,..::::: ; :::::::::::::::::::........ „:„:„:„.._ .... _... . , .. 1 . ...a. =,„ ..,,.... ,,..":„:„.: ::::::„4.::::::::::::::::::::.:::... , _ ti\-- , ' ,,,::::::::::::::::::::::,,,,.:.::::::::::::„:„:„:„ -II' ak'rjerA 11111111 4 i ......./......., ........:.::::.F.,..:.:.:.:.:.y..y.....::: p i v r 4 ,_ , v Es . to ; . ... * t . .,; bp. i _ I, ... i . • i I' ... i" , . . . g atIlt_ ..44111fim.4.1111" ' -- - 4 , 4>r i . . 'cil I ) \ 1 ; _ i y ( • Ilf p,, .421 ,e 04.44„4 ‘I NA I 1 ,---.....04 1 A E . : 1 i Ael 411-t,,,D 4e\vue:: Ilt I , k 1 1 . i l•I --r- nr J I • EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION LEISURE ESTATES - EAST ANNEX The Westerly' 240 feet of the following: . The.. East 435. 8 feet of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter . of the Northeast quarter of Section 16 , Township 23 North, Range 6 East, W.M. EXCEPT the South 321 feet; EXCEPT the North 245 feet; EXCEPT the East 30 feet; EXCEPT all Coal and minerals and the right to explore for and mine the same. • ALSO The South 2 feet of the North 245. feet of the East 435. 8 feet of the . 'Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 16, Township 23 North, Range' 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, lying West of the East 195. 8 feet thereof; EXCEPT all; coal and minerals and the right to explore for and mine the same. AND The North 200 feet .of the South 321 feet of the East 435. 8 feet of the Southeast quarter of the. Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 161, Township 23 North, Range 6 East, W.M. , EXCEPT the East 30 feet, Situated in the City of Renton, County of King, State Of Washington. LEISURE ESTATES - SOUTH ANNEX The West 1, 326. 53 feet of the North 330 feet of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 16 , Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , EXCEPT the East 30 , feet, Situated in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Wahsington. SECTION II: The City of Renton' s "Comprehensive Plan" and maps, data and reports in conjunction therewith are hereby modified and amended, pursuant to the public hearings held in connection therewith as hereinabove specified, which amendments and modifications relate to the following described properties, to-wit: 'See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein, and said properties described in said Exhibit are hereby designated as Low-density Multiple Residential. SECTION III: The Planning Director is hereby authorized' and directed to make the necessary changes on said City' s "Comprehensive Plan" and the maps in conjunction therewith to evidence the afore- described amendment. SECTION IV: The City Clerk is further authorized and directed to file this Ordinance as provided by law, and a complete copy of said document likewise being on file with the office of the City Clerk of the City of Renton. SECTION V: This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 2nd day of October , 1978. 71e ‘VL De oresA. Mead, City er APPROVED BY THE MAYOR, this 2nd day of October , 1978. . Earl" .ynter; o , 'Pro..tem Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: October 6, 1978 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 3253 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND MAPS AND DATA IN CONJUNCTION THEREWITH RELATING TO CERTAIN PROPERTIES IN THE GENERAL VICINITY EAST OF AND SOUTH OF LEISURE ESTATES MOBILE HOME PARK AND WEST OF UNION AVENUE WHEREAS the Planning Commission of the City of Renton and the City Council have heretofore adopted and filed a "Comprehensive Plan" as evidenced by Resolution No. 1240, and Ordinance No. 2142, and as same have been implemented and amended from time to time, together with the adoption of various codes, reports and records, and WHEREAS since said adoption the Planning Commission has heretofore duly recommended to the City Council, from time 'to time, certain amendments to said City' s "Comprehensive Plan" ; and WHEREAS the Planning Commission held a public hearing on or about April 12, 1978 and May 10, 1978; and WHEREAS the Planning Commission has made certain findings and recommendations to the City Council of the City of Renton, and WHEREAS the City Council held a public hearing on this matter on September 18, 1978, and all parties appearing in favor of or in opposition to said amendment to the City' s Comprehensive Plan having been duly heard at such public hearing, and WHEREAS the City Council has duly determined, after due consideration of the testimony and evidence before it that it is advisable and appropriate to amend and modify the City's "Comprehensive Plan" and likewise modify the recommnedations of the Planning Commission and such modification being in the best interest and for the public benefit, NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I : The aforestated finding and recitals are hereby found to be true and correct in all respects, and the City Council . hereby modifies and amends the recommendations and findings of the Planning Commission as hereinbelow set forth. RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON tqfiARING EXAMof NER —1 OCT 61978 AM • PM 7 t8t911001e 12e l i 2: 14 e 5 o6 / , . AGEND ,�Pa_, I' TEM THE CITY OF RENTON v •2 v i-' `_, MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MiLL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 9SER£i:=i v "+, O O� .e. ` �. CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • PLANNING DEPA ;bn3; Elkr.i' 0 �% 235-255© RECEIVE® 'C0� OF RENTON August 16 , 1978 HEARING EXAMINER AUG1 71978 AM FM The Honorable C . J . Del aurenti , Mayor 7°8°9°l�°ltr�l`1°2i��4�5r6 Members of the City Council Renton , Washington • RE : COUNCIL REFERRAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION DEAN W. BITNEY REZONE , FILE R-179-78 . Dear Mayor and Council Members : The Planning Commission reviewed the subject referral at their meeting of August 9 , 1978 . After considerable discussion and .deliberation , the following action was taken : ACTION: MOVED AND SECONDED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION REAFFIRM THEIR PRIOR OPINION THAT THE TWO AND ONE—HALF ACRE SITE IS A ZONING MATTER AND THAT THE MATTER BE REFERRED TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR A DECISION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. In view of the action by the Planning Commission it is recommended that this matter be referred to the Council Planning and Development Committee . Very truly yours , e Li se_tx...u..... • . rdon Y. �ficksen , Planning '�,'�rector GYE : WR : sh lip 0V R :: o THE CITY OF RENTON � MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI 1 MAYOR e LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER O Q. L. RICK BEELER , 235-2593 O .feb SEPI ° July 11, 1978 Mr. Dean W. Bitney 108 Factory Avenue N. Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mr. Bitney: As a result of my analysis of your application, File No. R-179-78, for rezone, and reaching findings and conclusions, I discovered that in order for a final recommendation to be reached, a decision was 'required pertaining to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation for the subject property. Copies of memoranda concerning this legal issue are attached. Therefore, this matter will be required to be reviewed by the City Council and the attached letter, dated July 11, 1978, will be placed on the Council agenda on July 17, 1978. Hopefully, the matter can be resolved in an expeditious manner to enable you to proceed with your proposed development, and the delay is sincerely regretted. You will be notified, either by this office or the City Clerk, of all action taken by the City Council regarding this matter. S' • e.el ,. L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner cc: David R. Millard 4OFRv U ;i O © OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY • RENTON,WASHINGTON o O "I.' o, POST OFFICE BOX 626 100 2nd AVENUE BUILDING • RENTOIV,WASHINGTON 98055 255-0678 <4,Q► LAWRENCE J.WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY 0 46 41-EDSEP1 July 17 , 1978 RECEIVED ME MO RANDUM CITY OFRENTON HEARING EXAMINER TO: Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner JUL 1 81978 MA PM FROM: Lawrence J. WArren, City Attorney 7,8,9110,11112,I1213,4,5,6 Re: Rezone Application No. R-179-78 - Dean W. Bitney • Dear Rick: This letter is in response to your Memo on the above captioned matter, and confirming our prior conversations . It is my opinion that the two acre area should have been addressed by the Planning Commission as a change in the Comprehensive Plan, due to the irregular shape of the Comprehensive Plan and its rather specific dimensions . While the boundaries of areas on a Comprehensive Plan are not definite , specific lines , but rather graduations , when there is a specifically defined geometric shape set out by the Comprehensive Plan, the zoning authority must take that into account in changing zoning. Therefore , 'the geometric shape of the Comprehensive ' Plan should have been considered by the Planning Commission. At this point, a caveat should be expressed. Normally, a very small change in the Comprehensive Plan, such as the one proposed , of only two acres, would not be the proper subject matter for review by the ' Planning Commission. However, as previously expressed, due to the unusual geometric shape of the Comprehensive Plan at this particular point, review by the Planning Commission would appear to be. appropriate. It is my fear, that unless the Comprehensive Plan is revwed, that the rezone application would have a predetermined result. Of course, it would always be appropriate for the Hearing Examiner to review any request for a zoning change . For example, you could review a request for change in the zoning from the present R-1 designation to H-l. Perhaps the result would be preordained, but such a review is always appropriate . However, considering the avenues pursued by the applicant , a review of the Comprehensive Plan would be appropriate. If you desire any further informatio/{ on thillma ter, please feel free to contact me. Lawrence J. arren LJW: nd cc : Mayor Council President p . _. ? oF � 4 �0 THE CITY OF RENTON o H MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 • AL 0 °„ CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER O �42- L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593 �4TED SEP& June 28, 1978 TO: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney FROM: L. Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner SUBJECT: Rezone Application No. R-179-78, Dean W. Bitney • During my review of the record of this application I discovered that my reaching a conclusion appears to depend upon resolution of the appropriate Comprehensive Plan designation for the subject property. Mr. Bitney requested to enlarge the existing Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park through a rezone from G (single family) to.T (mobile home park) . The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map indicates the property to be single family residential. After review of this designation at the request of Mr. Bitney, the Planning 'Commission concluded on May 10, 1978, that the property was too small for their consideration' but appropriate for the Examiner's review. My conclusion from the • zoning code requirements seems to be that the Commission may have to rule on the Comprehensive Plan designation for the property prior to my making a recommendation to the City Council on the rezone application. On May 10, 1978, the Planning commission concluded: 1. Initially, the committee (Comprehensive Planning Committee Of the Planning Commission) , in reviewing the request, determined that the small two-acre parcel located at the entrance of the existing mobile home park (subject property of rezone application) was not a Comprehensive Plan question, but basically one of zoning, and should therefore be reviewed by the Hearing Examiner. A rezone application was submitted on May 26, 1378, and was heard by the Examiner on June 27, 1978. • Section 4-714 (Zoning - T, Trailer Parks) requires: A zone designated solely for mobile home parks. Such zone may be allowed in low, medium and high density milt) -family residential and commercial areas as designated on the city's Comprehensive Land Use Plan. (Emphasis added) Section 4-3010 (Duties of the bearing Examiner) does not include rendering decisions or recommendations regarding the Comprehensive Plan designations for property. Section 4-3014. (8) (Examiner. '„ 1)ecision'and Recommendation; Findings Required) specifies one of the findings for a reclassification: (B) That the property is potentially zoned for the reclassification being requested pursuant to the policies set: forth in the Comprehensive, Plan • , Lawrence J. Warren Page Two • June 28, 1978 • • and conditions have been met which would indicate the change is appropriate; Or • In order for me to' make findings regarding Section 4-714, I must draw a conclusion as to what area designation the Comprehensive Plan gives the property (single family, low, -,medium, or high density multi-family, or commercial) . This appears to exceed the scope of Section 4-3014. (B) which pertains to a comparison of the rezone request with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and goals and objectives, despite the fact that the Comprehensive Plan is a somewhat flexible guide to developmental decisions. Therefore, my conclusion is that the Planning Commission must decide upon the Comprehensive Plan land use designation for the property before I can make findings regarding Section 4-3014. (B) . Do you concur? . In addition, I would request your opinion as to whether mobile homes, provided they Meet applicable state, regulations, . could be located on individual lots within a typical single family residential subdivision. It seems that this has already been established in the affirmative by state law and some case law. My recommendation to the City Council is due July 11, 1978 so I would appreciate your response by July 5, 1978. • • L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department v �e ® 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY . RENTON,WASHINGTON C7 POST OFFICE BOX 626 100 2nd AVENUE BUILDING • RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 255-8678 I v' ry �Q- LAWRENCE J.WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY o�gTfoSEP V' July 17 , 1978 RECEIVED ME MO RANDUM CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER TO: Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner JUL 1 81978 AM Pkl FROM: Lawrence J. WArren, City Attorney 7,8,9,14,11aI,2,3,4,5 6 Re: Rezone Application No. R-179-78 - Dean W. Bitney A Dear Rick: This letter is in response to your Memo on the above captioned matter, and confirming our prior conversations . It is my opinion that the two acre area should ,have been addressed by the Planning Commission as a change in the Comprehensive Plan, due to the irregular shape of the Comprehensive Plan and its rather specific dimensions . While the boundaries of areas on a Comprehensive Plan are not definite , specific lines , but rather graduations, when there is a specifically defined geometric shape set out by the Comprehensive Plan, the zoning authority must take that into account in changing zoning. Therefore, the geometric shape of the Comprehensive Plan should have been considered by the Planning Commission. At this point, a caveat should be expressed. Normally, 'a .very small change in the Comprehensive Plan, such as the one proposed, of only two acres, would not be the proper subject matter for review by the Planning Commission. 'However, as previously expressed , due to the unusual geometric- shape of the Comprehensive Plan at this particular point, review by the Planning Commission would appear to be appropriate. It is my fear, that unless the Comprehensive Plan is revvwed, that the rezone application would have a predetermined result. Of course, it would always be appropriate for the Hearing Examiner to review any request for a zoning change. For example, you could review a request for change in the zoning from the present R-1 designation to H-l. Perhaps the result would be preordained, but such a review is always appropriate . However, considering the avenues pursued by the applicant, a review of the Comprehensive Plan would be appropriate. If you desire any further information/on thi ma ter, please feel free to contact me. Lawrence J. arren LJW:nd cc: Mayor Council President OF � � • 0 THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 2 NIL a .: [•lit.,! ,.. op .. CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER .O �Q' L. RICK BEELER , 235-2593 o"P�TFO SEPS�OO July 11, 1978 Members, Renton City Council Renton, Washington RE: File No. R-179-78; Dean W. Bitney Rezone Request; Recommendation of the Hearing Examiner. Dear Council Members: Normally you would receive the complete Examiner's Report and Recommendation at this time. However, as a result of my analysis of the application and reaching findings and conclusions, I discovered that in order for a final recommendation to be reached a decision needs to be made regarding the Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation for the subject property. In the attached memorandum to the City Attorney the reasons for drawing this conclusion are detailed. Mr. Warren has verbally confirmed my analysis and conclusion concerning the Comprehensive Plan question. A written legal opinion will follow shortly. Therefore, it is recommended that the City Council refer to the Planning Commission the determination of the,Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation for the property, which extends to Union Avenue S.E. Once this determination is finally decided upon by the Council, I will be able to make, within a few days, a final recommendation to the Council relative to the requested rezone. This delay to the applicant is sincerely regretted and most unfortunate. If the Examiner should forward a recommendation without the aforementioned determination, its validity would be doubtful and tenuous, thereby jeopardizing any final decision by the City Council regarding the rezone. Sincer L. /Ric Beeler Hearing Examiner Attachment cc: Dean W. Bitney Parties of Record Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti City Attorney, Lawrence J. Warren Warren' C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director .-- . - SECTION IV: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage , approval and legal publication. tt PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this,ic day of December, 1969-. TJTEle Nelson, City Clerk __APPROVED BY THE MAYOR thisibTay of December, 1969 . ,., i arre' t , ayor Approved as to form: -77 Gerard M. Shellan , City Attorney ATE OF PUBLMAITC4 DP 3. 9 1969 - 3 - /4 / A and all other plans and records pertaining thereto ; B. That portion o the SW 1/4 of S: cti+n 20 , ' ownship 23N, 'ang 5E. , W.M. , -1s•, being . a "ortion of P cel o. 30 as des bed i in•'.truments re. orded under Audito s File Nos 5959604 a, d' 6150, 34 describevj as fo lows : Beg` nning at e NW curn.er of sa'd 'SW 1/ ; then, a 'N 89°10 ' 20" E ong the ' .6rti lire ther:,of a dis ance of ;44. 88 fe-t t•, a .oint .. on th- north;asterly margin of ':enso•, oad; thenc_ S 16° 6 ' 56" E north_ -sterly margin of s- d road a &, stanc,- of 980 73 feet to the rue Point of Be_innipg of sa'm; Parcel 30 ; thence .,on 'nuing S 16°1��• ' 5 .'' E a di-t+:nce of 349 . 25 f e r to the True `o' ' t of Be yin :ing of parcel de. ribed herein; \, ence co ' inur;ng S 16°16 ' 5 " E along said . argin a c ista ,ce of 28. 00 fee to an angle p,6i'Qt ; the ce S 2`� °20 ' 40" E along -aim margin of en \•n Ro- a dis \-nce of 346 . 25 fret ' o the 'marlin o`F, the : interseceion of Benso' •Roam and Pu:et Dri\ e ; hence S 5 °25 ' 58" E along 'sa'id -rgin M distan•1- 'of 138 . 39 f tet to the northerly marg r,, of, 'uget Dri`,:. ; thence S 8 :°50 ' 40" E along said magi. a distanc sof 335 . 00 feet/ ; thence N 21°54 ' 14" W a 'stance of 4 : 2 5 feet to t e south':rly bounda, of Parcel No`. 40 as described in i -truments r-cmrded and r Aditor ' s File Nqs . .� '✓ 65171:71 and 65 07 ' thenc N 89 ".16 ' 56" W along said boundary : dis ance f 415 . 01 feet to the Tryr= Point of beginn g. Subject Y o easements o r 4;r1 record (Cont-ining 3 . acres more '•r less) proper y is ere e igna e to Commer lans e o. SECTION II: The City Engineer and Planning Director are hereby authorized and directed to make the necessary changes on said City' s "Comprehensive Land Use Plan" and the maps in conjunction therewith to evidence the aforedescribed amendment. SECTION 'III : The City Clerk and Planning Director are further authorized and directed to file this Ordinance , together with all exhibits and addenda thereto ,with the King County Auditor' s office and as otherwise provided by law, and a complete copy of said documents likewise being on file with the office of the City Clerk, City of Renton. 2 - PY RECEIVED UAL , 7 CITY OF RENTON (// HEARING EXAMINER l U% '/ JUN 2 71978 S"a ` AM PM ORDINANCE NO. 718,9'10,11,12,1,2,31415,6 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ! AMENDING THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN AND MAPS IN CONJUNCTION THEREWITH WHEREAS the Planning Commission of the City of Renton and the City Council have heretofore adopted and filed a "Comprehensive Plan" as evidenced by Resolution No. 1240 , and Ordinance No. 2142 , and as further implemented and amended by various plans , codes , reports and records , and WHEREAS since such adoption the Planning Commission having heretofore duly recommended to the City Council certain amendments to said City's "Comprehensive Plan" ; and said Planning Commission and City Council having duly held public hearings in relation to such amendments , and due notice thereof having been given as provided by law, and said public hearings having been held on the following dates , to-wit: October 8 and 22 , by Planning Commission November 24 , 1969 by City Council and all parties appearing in favor or opposition to said amendments having been duly heard at such public hearings , and WHEREAS as a result of such public hearings it is deemed advisable and appropriate to amend and modify the City's "Comprehensive Plan" ; NOW THEREFORE , BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF- RENTON AS FOLLOWS : SECTION I: The aforestated findings and recitals are hereby found to be true and correct in all respects . The City of Renton' s °Comprehensive Land Use Plan" and maps in conjunction therewith are hereby modified and amended, pursuant to the public hearings held in . connection therewith, as hereinabove specified, which amendments and modifications pertain to the following described properties , to-wit: A. The SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Se c1,6 Tw 23 N. Range 5 E, W.M. , in King County,/'E he east 435 . 8 feet thereof , subject to City of Seattle Transmission Line Right of Way. which above described property is hereby designated to " low density Multi Family Residential" on said Comprehensive Land Use plan, and any - 1 - l , ' :'i_, i�E[TING ,, Ia/7 l�""'sf s/ / I�_ ;1., ,,.'_• :i c, le, 270 Vashon Avenue Southeast, Renton, stated that the main ,•,; of the neighborhood is that if the 10 acre parcel is changed, _. ..,'�1 , - ,::,id happen to the area south of that parcel . He advised that the 3-, ?:, PP -from .- ''•. no;e park was acceptable, but apartments , etc. , would not be. i1. .. __ -. 1, r 1 ;•'i 1 .e i s v r e 4`:: ro.'� 'R WEBB MOVED, SECONDED BY (HANIS, THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING BE ):1 :heast . . ! '1nd :;'1'.s , ; sion followed as to whether to close the public hearing or refer .,1 rr,itter back to the committee. H; i=i,nevi11e Hit and . .f ,'Thxisting "i -. as:O.YER WEBB WITHDREW HIS PREVIOUS MOTION. , a i rput ; _ ., Place, _ it ;<,y W�'1! I rma n ,.i: 6r WEBB, SECONDED BY SCHELLERT, THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING BE CONTINUED '-a l i c_a- • " :?F:'ER THE MATTER OF CHANGE IN THE COMPREHENSIVE.PLAN BACK TO COMMITTEE. ,l PP ` li,,ti ,;.'l-,; : r,,ssion followed as to the order of the motion, pointing out that l O the e Ennis already had a motion on the floor. ;' s in stl 1,s y s e' e rs i. . Iiqn, the - `� rti r0';ER HANIS WITHDREW HIS PREVIOUS MOTION. -' i;;it' from q , compara- f�1 vehicle :,�I ;:)roposed •• )=N .'1ONER WEBB MOVED, SCHELLERT SECONDED, THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING Be I!r is • •':':: D AND TO CONTINUE THE MATTER TO COMMITTEE FOR A REPORT AT THE fs;r <II�i:�anning J, •1978 MEETING. __ .- 1:mil 1Ch is li.=B. •,I-i. Teegarden requested a roll-call vote. Secretary Gist read the roll : .„ :, no; Webb, yes; Gist, no; Mola, no; Porter, no; .Schellert, yes;li'i:' not be . ::irden, no. MOTION DEFEATED. '1O:hOUld 11 ;i. S t step I: -;E'EGARDEN MOVED, SCHELLERT SECONDED, THAT THE COMMISSION CONCUR IN iJinal . ..:".'.'-TTEE'S REPORT. ',H)it le pictu e ' :i'; ` l , ' . i' call vote was asked for byChairman Walker: Hanis; no; Wehh, no; i ,,prob ,c-rn ;,li es; Mola, yes; Porter, yes; Schellert, yes; Teegarden, yes. '1 �'- ----ARRIED. II .,review ---- — il?3 time - ' i6�re 'I">. heast .:E:7CARDEN MOVED, HANIS SECONDED, THAT THE t'UBLIC HEARING BE CLOSED. ''V�'the area CARRIED. ,;t 3. months „ •'.'•T I'v : • !q : {. ��REPORTS •g `TEf '-iashi ngton •, - ',; 'iSommi ttee �oal s and Policies Committee will meet Wednesday, May 17, 1978 at .m for 7,:30 PM. ` = site. i ;y)rehens i ve ;;.nprehensi ve Planning Committee will meet Wednesday, May 17, 1978 Tressed ,=,t 7:30 PM. ;, i, was no further business before the Commission, Chairman Walker adjourned .�;; i ,, r,g at 11 :00 PM. . ii . ., : &_//, ed...„41.6,,,__ : g•, ist, Secretary • Joan Wai ker, Chairman i? • ` PEN i ON PLANNING COP„•r,�S I ON PULI-C. HEARING MEETING ,;i ,i i ; C 1`iP1 1 1 n, 197G2 n , . ' P OE THREE •is • r• '; t.. B. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT: Dean W. O - -- Di they, Application CP- 903-77: .- . pI application for comprehensive land use plan designation amendment from :•, . `Il,''" '. `i! single family residential to low density multi-family residential ; ll s ' . . property located as listed below: i;li J . ��!�`' �•1'.ic,;j Parcel 1 : Approximately 2.4 acres between the '�'�-' existing Leisure , "k aki.'' Estates Mobile Home Park and Union Avenue Southeast approximately 121 feet north of Southeast Second j; :i;' Place. is ,. ` ' `' Parcel 2: Approximately imately 1 U acreslocatedle' ;'` . pp between thr, Bonneville ;i 'y,;:: •i:°; Power Administr'atioi, transmission line easement and s, °"`r ` Union Avenue Southeast directly south of the,, existing Ii`1 !'?i' Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park. Gordon Ericksen, Planning Director, stated that there was additional input ' > ;, in the form of a letter from Jean F. Truman, 4101 Southeast Second Place, .._ .`'i,F •. Renton, concerning the proposed Comprehensive ,), Walker read the letter to the Commission Plan amendment. Chair'rrr3ri . and a copy isonfile in a , ci tion CP-903-77 file. I p ' c7- ; , ��e `:= Mr. Ericksen pointed out that the letter indicated that the area to the -: ,,1.;:i;alp.•. 1.,,.• ;,1:;• north of Heather Downs is a 10 acre site for development, but it is in 'eM'le:1:,.;; reality a 20 acre site and .is awaiting the installation or sanitary sewers ,t•,_ "' in order to develop. In addition to the letter from Jean F. Truman, the I . :P.:: Comprehensive Planning Committee has received some additional input from i'eN,W° Dean W. Bithey and David Millard, Land Management Associates; with compara- � � '•ttr j 4';• ` • tive analysis in regard to single family use and mobile home park, vehicle "`dry`' traffic. the rules for residents of Leisure Estates and a copy of proposed . -..iq.; p p sed .•.,, restrictive covenants. ,M """'' ' Discussion followed concerning the study that the Comprehensive Planning " ''+ Committee had done. Clark Teegarden read the committee's report which is on file (copy attached): >w .rA l'H i.!__ . Commissioner Hanis brought up the point that the Commission should not be ale. e! !' r'``• ` determining whether a trailer park should be built, but that they should s ,i. ' ,`1 consider the ap propriate use of the entire area, ''' " • Clark Teegarden pointed out that the Planning Commission is the 'first ste 1,; !er involved in the process of getting to the Hearing Examiner for a final p ,. !I., decision. He also pointed out that the Committee i,. i ��cc looked at the whole p 1 C tuY< • ,l „_,. _. including the -impact of multi family urea e or the land. The main problem ` ' :c'. seems to be access. Any development will gcompouncf the problem. Commissioner 5che1 le t askedClark 1Ee r arden about the Committee' s review,;!i' of the Comprehensive Plan in the Highlands area with regard to the time • ii.; :°- span involved. Mr. Teegarden replied that at the present time they were !`I-•'' . working on the southeast quadrant. It is anticipated that the northeast . 'Y.;;:.. quadrant would be the next area that would be cunsidered, which is the area 0!. {,; .. that we are now discussing. He advised that there are several months ! 1.;'.; of work left on the southeast quandrant review. Chairman Walker then asked ° '' 'P :,'' for comment from Mr . Bithey. !` .111 t, :'4 _ ;.. , ; David L. Millard, Land Management, 22627 - 152nd Southeast, Kent, Washington <R,=, �!'' :` was representing Mr. Bi the He stated that they had met with the Committee r ;o, l';.:: ';:� the y. 1: ,; previous Wednesday. .,He agreed that tie 2 2 acre site is a problem for ; i ;i.i the Hearing Examiner and would move on to the subject of the 10 acre site. i'�'a;1;:� Mr. Millard stated that have y to, unwillingly, go through a Comprehensivci i1' :i';':� Plan change to the designation of low density mutli-family. He expressed .c,. i,• ', concern in usingthis method to achieve their goal of a "T" zone. j:iii'' keifl 1; : I� l ..• .. - V I - 0,f • ti , 12111110U Iva d v .. -.-- ,.-,i;. .` ,...' , .0.0 1 , ,:, • c. ••0 tk,z0 . i . „ f;q A. 5Q Ae 9 l/v • .,.A �Jrge 9 zoi pci fry 0 D , ......,,,, 1 APN .L /Eir * . ,,b. i __-- ,_--- ,'.7 ,,•• . - --7.04.7,..,,„..., c>,, ,,-- ___-- • .„:6, ...,...— _ , ,,,, ry,,,,A.:..,;_:>,....s..„....../. ...„....). . __,.3, • . . . :. • • 3vr • A '6I xx //,V .chi44 �* f'/'.°2- poittio;.;, - \ • .I �r .! BZ ecrcx .A ,, h ,. cos , ------ , ,, , - ate* AAA ;; a� 0�° 0 °°°4ee� �O I %.,‘ p �� a Jed_�© fifir � i OOPS, „ , , F hi , ,, __ •___,.____ ,. . — ,--t_. . . ,. . ,,,-____-410: -4•0-4••••—••-ie—i-oMp 1 1 a''.. ' .o•°.'„ '1/4,i--o" , % • :,,,r . ,,, . , , , , , i : ; ,. . ..0 ,...4 .5 :, :.", ii j • • ` ,♦�'". ' ; '- ...f_1 ',`.:ar`.• nl ��O/I 1 + f 1 J.R:, .� a i0 /// /y// 1 1 I! ^y I I H 9 1 ' 1I---1 ! . . • . . �• , � . ,,,,,./ ---- l 1 1 I 7 I 1 1 ' O I o �i'Gf� I 1 , . . • • 1 I 1 I AOI_MN -D. I // /' r C�_ ? tali I QOOMN�12i9 % % 1 yik ll . iIi11if -IIH :! 1 I IhEEL I'I I I I iT11- Y 0 H +` a„.' 1 I • • • . ,.. y • �. .. . . r_.a .. • .ra... .. . R-1 ..t• ,• 1l .•�. • • • • 0 • .....--, ..,. • .• - -. • .• . • r":4(R- . .. LI: '' . I i k• ••• . "• 1 i • ••:`•-•'-v-i - I SSA ..GS—I 141 G t , . V rr 1Y Yw •;� �. - ' •S Raillr ^\\ �� ;77. IL- o • • rs, < 8-I. . y to , _ - • 0000.00.001, Bal _ r � � L I A F G G - � � • GREE�i'•^FOODill"..1 . • e c_V,c TER), I • i Rilrir • L—I r`r .. I11 4 • '1 4,L .. . G T ,, ..., cT SITE' I IN • • • APPL I CANT pecan W Qiine y TOTAL AREA f aYgcres PRINCIPAL ACCESS /'j Q `./fl i p /e N 1/G y�_67 EXISTING ZONING 11Or . 6evirtit-1 '14Csi£ica-liQA► D•.Stra . EXISTING USE LIndeue/aped • • PROPOSED USE i'Single_ &rti+ill (l�•13i le rlmrs 1 rafts I COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE , PLAN Sin4/e rota►+:/ Res i�/eediQ/ COMMENTS ,... ..- _ --- --- �.� 1 5 F 11;ND T. I - - ��I ] Nfl p CI ��1 U '�� 44 AO Q ISI IP . N._ n.Ise....... 1 �OD0.. , . , . , I COonwamisaiani.m.. 11401:401.064...bi bl2460 140+.4% iZg- Y Wi s 0 :1- RI 4..1 Q I: t . 40' .6. a.N4 es.: 0111 ow URI EN Ns 1 W 0'r° 0 W 0 03s. p a 0 o. ,‘ 0 i 1'ti 0 i O 0 0 g:-- - dD 3 0- 0 • scaler rev200. C5ZI boa3ttr31re- . Q DEAN 817NI y Re NF NO. R-179-78 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) ) County of King • Marilyn. J. Petersen , being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: • That on the 12th day of October , 19 78 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision, or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. • Subscribed and sworn this day of A-0\13 19 "(`6 . LlY\ • . VU)-W. • Notary Public in and for the State • of Washington, residing at Reritoh Application, Petition or Case: Dean W. Bitney, R-179-78 (The m-inutee contain a £Lot oti the paittie.o n,econd) 41 o THE CITY OF RENTON t.2c.) .. _` r MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 .. o k CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER co. p Q- L. RICK BEELER , 235-2593 440 SEPIt° October 19, 1978 Members, Renton City Council Renton, Washington RE: File No. R-179-78; Dean W. Bitney Request for Rezone. Dear Council Members: Attached is the Examiner's Report and Recommendation on the referenced rezone request, dated October 12, 1978. The appeal period for the application expires on October 26, 1978, and the report is being forwarded to you for review by the Planning and Development Committee following the seven-day period from the date of publication. The complete file will be transmitted to the City Clerk on October 27, 1978, and will be placed on the Council agenda on November 6, 1978. If you require additional assistance or information regarding this matter, please contact the undersigned. Sincere ly7;2 1101_1 4 i L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department • City Clerk z�� THE CITY OF RENTON .. MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 p .... ` CHARLES J. DELAURENTI., MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 4 L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593 0 ./E0 SEPSC4\- October 27, 1978 Mr. Dean W. Bitney, 108 Factory Avenue N. Renton, WA 98055 RE: File No. R-179-78; Dean W. Bitney Request for Rezone. Dear Mr. Bitney: This is to notify you that the above referenced request, which was approved subject to conditions as noted on the Examiner's report of October 12, 1978, has not been appealed within the time period established by ordinance, and therefore, this application is being submitted to the City Clerk for transmittal to the City Council for final approval. You will receive notification of final approval upon adoption of an ordinance by the City Council. Sincerel .,—� L. Rick Beeler. Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk • _ . - -.• • ; c4e4o ga ,..• - • . • • • , , „ • : - - • - •••" - • • .„ • .• . „ , „ • • ,. „. -•• • . • • _ • • • • • • ":.• • DECLARATION';'0.F: RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS .. . • ,, • '• , . -,.; • . • , •.• '• • WHEREAS' DEAN 14 and his wife , M , are, the -• •'. • • • • - •.? •r- •; •, -• ;."•-••••„;•:--• „• • ' ••'• ••"'"‘ • • • • .r•-f owners of the following real property in • '- ' • .• 't••• ••' • c. ".;• ' • •;'-...*,'•.:••••:.• c.c.•:;• • ••• ••. •••''••;•,-''• City of Renton , County . ••• ' ,. . -• , •• , . • _.; • • , • , • , . , . •• • • •- . • • •-• • - ••• • of KinStateg ,H, • of• g ton r•tbred ••a sf•ita•1 '••••••;•::: . .••.„-,,••• • - • •; •.-,•• •" •-• • ..• • -• . • '• • . • • ' :'• • •• • .• •• . ' •• '' • - • . • - • '•• •'• ••••, -•• ,"'• , LEISURE ESTATES EASTS. •ANNEX, y ••,•• • .„• ••••••: , • • T h westerlye'.; 240 feet of. the following ; . • '• • • • • : .• • "' • " -• 9-•"'''•• :• ; •- , • • • (*.W.' "• ' ••, - ,'••• . • •-;,, • • •,'W;• • ••'";': The •':'east"435 f the Southeast r:q u a rter,-Of.:the Southeast f• Quarter •of the Northeast /Quarterof,-,,,.ESection., ship 23- • North , '''Range"5 East , W,. • „., • ,•••.• • •" • •" • - • — . EXCEPT south z•,3 2-1 :.•: • . - '•••• - • , •‘ - • ;• •• ••- -•••'•• .•-;,%;•-•„7- • •, t.•,•" ••';';•4;•i' C the•/,no 245north feet ; • .•• • • . • • •• ••••- - - •,,••••:•••••A • • • • EXCEPT the east'-`,3 0,•'•-fe e • • • - • •-•EXCEPT• all -.,O6a.1"• and exPOr.e for and,, • „: , • mine the , _ •_.• -• • • • • • • ,• ••-" ALSO . , _ •.• • ;, -,•••••••••••:- r;-:;• - • • ••• ••• ••'/` •,*The south 2 feet of the north 245 feet of the east „ ' •• ' • 5:. 8 feet of the • • . '; ''';••• ,r?• .t„^„ , .••Southeast i„..• .- ,;-• •.•A •••,..'••.••.„,„.t:•e•- .;' , • .'-• , - 7 ..,••• . „''.•-" ,;•••.'• -• N o• r r.t•••'• y arter of Secti0n- 16 ,, rownshIpi234 -Ran .East ; • • t M n , n County ,., n llgwest, itne east 195 . 8 feet thereof; • =- . EXCEPT all ,• • ••• " • " - • •-•,'-'.•c for and • mine the same.. • • •%•,'' '•', • ••1'?':-'4."•''',••••;-':'•'•'-';•?'••;'• -4e--•••• .s. • • - •• • ' ,••;,".•,.' • ; •• ••• ' • ••'''•'• •`•' '• ; • zr,•='•±T.' 0;d,t;,'-f 4,4:;) ,•••••X,, ;•• • ';'‘ •••', •' . • ,• A1 D •••y ". ',••••,i••• •,:tr•;:::•44.,101.1;;-01-4 4-•••••,.- ••••,•• ' , - ,•. ••.4 •!,1-. -T he,r4north-,;-2-0{V•ife'etti of the south 3 2,1, feet, east. ..4.3 5,-. § • - • • ,.•••.-.•...1,••,.? • 'Jr•Z,:" •',,,• • • f the st st arter f the .•.— • • ••• • .-.: •••. •••: • • ..• - • Q u arter of SectionRange. • • ,: • '••EXCEPT the • •• • ••• Situate:in, theC-i-ty•Y:,,0,f,';',7,Re400A7f, CAunt e• : •- • ;," • ' •J., •••.'•Washington .• •-• . • ',••:is• ,•' As• '.:LEISURE 'EST SOUTH ANNEX '=44) , • • •::.? • ,;:, ••„ I he'l'..tv-6§te.--1''''3 2'& 53 feet Off",'..tkreOnort k 330 feet of th"e, Northeast •-•!: Southeast•-;Mil•art w n:s • '-••••!,;:-A-1.b • ••, • •,:•"•- • :••••,... • • „or nn " • • • , „North ,, „ • . , 7 f • ;•-• EXcEPT the east'' feet ;30 • . .-„ : Situate"••• in •.'•• .• , •, •••••:: t 0 .• , • ,: • . „ .• ;„•,, ,„ ,•„14,,,•.,.• \•• „. " • - • " ' • • • ••'- •••, ••. • • •-•',..•••.••.•'• ••••, '.•; ,o -•.'„••••-- •-• • W HE RE A S the owners of•-.1,' said hereinafter• •• •• • •. • - .2„,,1"„ • - he' -.prop e rty, desire5,„t rta • .• ••••';. •.• nts , !••••,'`••• • ' ';'•••'-`:',").1"4".••;•',Pf.5-;i4A?•• •,,-•• runningwith the land as to use, present, - ,,%,;.ant.:.4futu re4L:Aosf-Ptke.: property . .,".• '• ••••"•• ,•,„-• • NOW, THEREFORE , f ories'.4 7,thf,olsn er•s;:ix.,hettet establish , grant • •;• • -;• ' •„ • - • • .4./_,").; ,„ , ' •• •'-';;;. _ '-• ; • '• -.4. • -""''" n d:.."impose';•••;17.e st tcovenants t?',r0 ItnTrIgg.!•„11,11th the land as to ' .the u he land •• he i`a ;':••'...•!•••(••••,•'!'' h•• e use by !•• •,•; ; •••••' • • • • •;' "'''• • • the undersigned , • theirt.t,c cfollows ,•• • " ' •.• " • , •;- • '•• •‘' • ' •••••,:'' • . -• • " • ;•:": •":1,,• PERMITTED .• • • „ ;• ,; • ,„ ; . . . • • , ••.•,•Kci.,,,-1,4,"4 • ; • • • • ..•, . •,„ " , • • Permitted uses of the property shall be limited to the uses„.,allowed•,„ : .• •••• • .• , •• •, • , .,„. •:, in the „,,. _,.••••• • .• .• • • ••'•_; :••• " Trailer Park Zone as specified in Section 4-714 , • : • ,• ,'• • [,'• ;• • •-' • 4.. •: ,4 7,•, -• • c".," • •-•„ • • • • •'" C••' •`-), -4 - -• , • • - Chapter 20, Title 'IV ; •'Ordinance-,No,t; 162.8.,, Code':of. -General Ordinances , : ' ' City of Renton , King County, 'Washi.ng'ton :. , T.n - the ;event ;the subject property ;is- used for • any purpose ,.other' than those purposes described ' . herein , the Comprefrensi've Plan-;'designation and the zoning of the , _ • subject property shall ,.r-evert '•to.- the., designation and zoning presently existing , ( single fam,i'ly res-iden'tta.l' ; '__G , General Classification N • District)- • . ' CONTTNGEN,CY` O These restrictive -covenants are solely- d•epe.nde'nt, on the revision of ' • , . , ' zAthe City ' s Comprehensive Plan- and' rezone; �o:f'•'the .subject property , or ', � ti : any part thereof to allow —the uses d,escr' ibed:.;und'er the section titled , �., • ' "Permitted • ,Use , " contained ,,hereinabo'"v-e .'_''''If; •the Comprehensive Plan • ; ';, and zone -i;_s�, not changed 'to permit7';said: Luse;; 't;hes.e' restrictive , , covenants •are null ' and ,-void as ;:to':t'he 'subjec=t :.prope•rty, or part Y: thereof �h q �'. . • DUR,ATI';�'M ,'�• . These covenants shall- .rurv':with,' t'hk'.:•1'aud 'and..':'expir:e`.:'on' December 31 , .,.. 2025 unless-• termi nated.:'a. - described „u,nde•r ••t;hef',_s .t;t.econ , , ;titled :"Conti:ngency, her•einabove .? 'If-Nany, an,`yi. ,tf,m'e -improvements -.are instal 1ed.;pursuant ,to ' these •• coveKi`a-rrtstti'stthe.,•porti';on o,f: ;the ,covenants pertaining to the -specific 'ins•talled, improv.em,ent.s:.as - required by the. :,'; ' Ordinances.-.of the 'City,+ of Renton:shal'l term'-Mate.-without: necessity of further. documentation " - " ' • ' Any _violation or breach ;of theser,estricti':v'e 'co've,nants may be enforced •: '', 'yr S by proper legal- procedures 'in'i't,fie;`•S'upe,r'io:r:`Co'urt• 'of:� Ki'ng ,County' by '' ,r ' either ,the City- of Renton ,or- a,,ny5,.,p,rp:p.e-rty,"r o�wn 'rs ..adj'oini-ng subject. -;'', l''' - ij l" _ ',.1.-1_. ' 1 ''f''1?.','l�J • property who, are adversely affected_ ,y-, each.. :Re'aso,nabl a ,T 'attorne s','' .'f:e•e's 'incur ed duir:i'n.g',:4.a'. ro'.ce'e_d•i:n ,;will be --`,:e,.•,, ,.r :, ' Y . . r n e�'f.or;cem.e,nt;: P. 9: _{_. , . : borne by the parties,''whom the court;"`d'e,t'erm'i:n:es• ar.e_: ''i`n .'..error and shall,. l' be entered -as a judgment . ' •: ,,. ' r, '�'' , .2,2;,' i n such�'°:ac�t;� on:,•; .°�. •s:•,�,,;�. ,,,; ' , r .,. .;.. . .:•:' - : . De,a'n, ,• B`i t • . , •- ,;- :tA.; ' • r• ,I -\r •_ s , , i" , _ f rY,A '•,,ram i? r, - •{ '-' ,,ram.' .,. ,t .u 1 ' 0;4 _ ... .. `,_. a •;. ;� "• .,',• r~1-,1,:1 ASHINGTON ,,,: ;;!''"• • _, w ' STATE OF 4T ) -ss � . _ • _,.-._ r, '- �- , . : ,,. COUNTYO KING ) - ;;tu,,� ., • .,,,''•:.ws r 5 e;`4,� x'; 'i;',,1978.,:,',beforg me per.spni-7,::Y ; ,--,fi.t'<', :a .,. On this • .' day of ;Sy ;-7` : '- ,. 'l,„� -.M BI•TNEY. ands'•.'J'ON -CL`'`:j+1;•:�BTTN'EY;:,''h' s-' -wife', � ',:,:;:'-„ • -'-',--:,..ally -'a 'ea•r�ed DEAN W r. ,.,.._ ,.,.., `, -�,;.. , , . • persons who executed the within and and foregoing' instrument , and • acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and r, deed of said person for the uses ands,:.-purposes " therein mentioned . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand, and affixed my official seal the-.day and year' fir-st- above •written . O - Tr N 4\ T i r'Yr CD�' ,� *� c � otary Public in and for the state of a' 4t: ��.. Washington,• res:idin at /0, -. "- . _ -(3 1\\ 1 t1, • • ' , , ifs-�,• • • • • • • 40. • • • • • ," • i d • 1 • • • • • • ', _ .rL.11'i , EXHIBIT "A" LEISURE ESTATES - EAST ANNEX The westerly 240 feet of the following: The east 435.8 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 16, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., EXCEPT the south 321 feet; EXCEPT the north 245 feet; EXCEPT the east 30 feet; EXCEPT all coal and minerals and the right to explore for and mine the same. ALSO The south 2 feet of the north 245 feet of the east 435.8.feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of the North- east Quarter of Section 16, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, lying west of the east 195.8 feet thereof; EXCEPT all coal and minerals and the right to explore for and mine the same. AND The north 200 feet of the south 321 feet of the east 435.8 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 16, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, EXCEPT the east 30 feet; Situate in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. LEISURE ESTATES - SOUTH ANNEX The west 1,326.53 feet of the north 330 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 16, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., , EXCEPT the east 30 feet; • Situate in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. t S.F.(3anw T. E=3 El Jliap p Ise r ia ao torsi 573._.- -- 0 I . A-, iti ❑ GUM\tS )C14,-t'rr•1.61. 0 SA , aqw, ,..,.., Moei1.E ma E {mac_ tie / J c.u y{ . .. '. �ni ,.it.t.: .. .- •t;..%:*:;::'::.... it t i--iSca` 1 s.a ®r. ces.a 0' 1� CPI11 44) �loiDu Ns 1111, =o y sus %. 02so 0 ; 0 J 0;s4 p ' Q o.o ,� O ' - p O Q D s� 0 5.& 3Fp$ o C 6 p o IS 030 0 • ScAtrr /"02001 rip EusamerSire bEAN ®I rWVBY IREioNE No. R-179-78 • DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS • WHEREAS, DEAN W. BITNEY and his wife, JONELL M. BITNEY, are the owners of the following real property in the City of Renton, County • of King, State of Washington, described as follows: CD 0, 4 ' LEISURE ESTATES EAST ANNEX O .P— The westerly 240 feet of the following: • !SD CD The east 435.8 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast CD Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 16, Township 23 'North, Range 5 East, W.M. , CO EXCEPT the south 321 feet; EXCEPT the north 245 feet; • EXCEPT the east 30 feet; EXCEPT all coal and minerals and the right to explore for and mine the same. AL50 The south 2 feet of the north 245 feet of the east 435.8 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of the North- east Quarter of Section 16, Township 23 North,' Range 5 East, • W.M. , in King County, Washington, lying west of the east 195.8 feet thereof; EXCEPT all coal and minerals and the right to explore for and mine the same. AND The north 200 feet of the south 321 feet of the east 435.8 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of the •Northeast Quarter of Section 16, Township 23 North, Range 5 . East, W.M. , • EXCEPT the east 30 feet; Situate in the City of Renton, County of King, State of • Washington. LEISURE ESTATES - SOUTH ANNEX ' • The west 1,326.'53 feet of the north 330 feet of the. Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 16, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , EXCEPT the east 30 feet.; Situate in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. WHEREAS, the owners of said described property, hereinafter "the property," desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with thy land as to use, present and future, of the property: NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs and' assigns, as follows: PERMITTED USE Permitted uses of the property shall be limited to the uses allowed in the "T," Trailer Park Zone as specified in Section 4-714 and -1- Chapter 20, Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances, ; City of Renton, King County, Washington. In the event the subject property is used for any purpose other than those purposes described herein, the Comprehensive Plan designation and the zoning of the subject property shall revert to the designation and zoning presently existing (single family residential ; G, General Classification 0.1 District). CONTINGENCY O These restrictive covenants are solely dependent on the revision of O the City's Comprehensive Plan and rezone of the subject property, or OD I- any part thereof to allow the uses described under the section titled, "Permitted Use," contained hereinabove. If the Comprehensive Plan and zone is not changed to permit said use, these restrictive covenants are null and void as to the subject property, or part thereof. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025 unless terminated as described under the section titled, "Contingency," hereinabove. If any any time improvements are installed pursuaht to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation. Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by said breach. Reasonable attorneys' fees incurred during an enforcement proceeding will be borne by the parties whom the court determines are in error and shall \. be entered as a judgment in such action. / / —/ Crct.� Dean W. Bitn C2/1-1-121J (JotellclB tney �' STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING ) ss •'' // On this ,7/. f`day' of _ ��. iF,„ r .�• , 1978, before me person- ally appeared DEAN W. BITNEY and JONELL M. BITNEY, his wife, the -2- persons who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of •said person for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. O , Notary Public in and for the state of CD` Washington residing at J,t4„ Oaf • • -3- CITY OF RENTON., WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 3264 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON , WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM GENERAL CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT (G) TO TRAILER PARK (T) . (R-179-78 ) WHEREAS under Chapter 7, Title IV (Building Regulations ) of Ordinance No. '1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton" , as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as General Classification District (G) ; and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Planning Department on or about May 30, 1978 which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about June 27 , 1978 , and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request being in conformity with the City ' s Comprehensive Plan, as amended , and the City Council having daily considered all matters relevant thereto, and all. parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON , WASHINGTON , DO )RDAI.N A,.', FOLLOWS : fl,F:CTION 1 : The following described property in the C.i ty of Renton is hereby rezoned to Tra:i ler Park (T)' as hereinbelow specified; subject 1 (I the findings , conclu:i;ions and decision dated October 12 , 1978 of the City ' s Hearing Lxomincr; the Planning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zon:ing,. Ordinance , a:; amended , to evidence said rezoning, to-wit : -1- As per Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth (Said property located approximately 100.0 feet scuth of N. E. 4th Street and adjacent to Union Avenue S .E . and the existing Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park) AND SUBJECT FURTHER to that certain Declaration of Restrictive Covenants executed by Petitioner-owners on or about September 29 , 1978 and recorded in the office of the Director of Records and Elections, Receiving No . 7810061020 and which said Covenants are hereby incorporated and made a part hereof as if fully set forth. SECTION II : This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage , approval and five ( 5 ) days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 20th day of fovember , 1978 . _izziotea, Q , Thd Delores A. Mead , City CL rk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 20t.h day of November, 1978 . Charles J/ Delaurenti, Mayor • v Approved as to form: rN • Lawrence J. War en, City Attorney Date of Publication: November 24 , 1978 EXHIBIT "A" LEISURE ESTATES - EAST ANNEX The westerly 240 feet of the following : The east 435 . 8 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of the, Northeast Quarter of Section 16 , Township 23 North , Range 5 East , W.. M . , EXCEPT the south 321 feet ; EXCEPT the . north 245 feet ; EXCEPT the east 30 feet ; EXCEPT all coal and minerals and the right to explore for and mine the same . • ALSO The south 2 feet of the north 245 feet of the east 435 . 8 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of the North- east Quarter of Section 16 , Township 23 North , Range 5 East , W . M . , in King County , Washington , lying west of the east 195 . 8 feet thereof ; EXCEPT all coal and minerals and the right to explore for and mine the same . AND The north 200 feet of the south 321 .feet of the east 435 . 8 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 16 , Township 23 North ; Range 5 East , EXCEPT the east 30 feet ; Situate in the City of Renton , County of King , State of Washington . LEISURE ESTATES - SOUTH ANNEX The west 1 , 326. 53 feet of the north 330 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 16 , Township 23 North , Range 5 East , W . M . , EXCEPT the east 30 feet ; Situate in the City of Renton , County of King , State of Washington . r -7 •£. 134140 6T. :' ri'. .1,�,.ckr ;` '', ' - ....away ,. -I, , . ,'',--L- ' '.,...,' ‘Cl. ,, ktk il' ;'!'!:' ..'' i':::ci''''''",' 2 1. , ::„.7.4 -1 ire ria74 pz ti. '1, e• E 1 - 4_^ l.`��� nof .-.... 1 �rt �. 4 D I , . I El �`,;,ts A•i�-iA��- i� ✓r r.:rgw ... CO Oxtdillr Wig L4i *E £.TABS $ ,s, �� ... ►olit1.E Nvima f 3z a 0 "a° ri::::::::::.••:•::::::::::::::▪:ilir S r: tu ,,,. - , .,, ,- ... `o. 318�' ' x93` f tlf•� • .° Q clt.0 0 � an , log: r y o PL. 1_4 03C° 0 .W 0 tt J • vi if] . t. 0 ,o ,01L1 0: t o d �� u 300 Q 6.�. 31`o'T' p C 03a' O 0 :SCALE /'�:200' to 9]:),.. Eua3itT s,r. Q' ':DEAN 6ITNsry. AtesOK, NO. R-119-78 , . DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS , DEAN W . BITNEY and his wife , JONELL M . BITNEY , are the owners of the following real property in the City of Renton , County of King , State of Washington , described as follows : ® • LEISURE ESTATES - EAST ANNEX .r— The westerly 240 feet of the following : • O The east 435 . 8 feet ' of 't.he Southeast Quarter of the Southeast C7) Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 16 ; Township 23. North , Range 5 East , W. M. , CO EXCEPT the south 321 feet ; EXCEPT the north 245 feet ; EXCEPT the east' 30 feet ; EXCEPT all coal and minerals and the right to explore for and mine the same . ALSO ' The south 2 feet of the north 245 feet of the east 435 . 8 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of the North- east Quarter of Section 16 , Township 23 North , ,Range 5 East , ' W . M. , in King County , Washington , lying west of the east 195 . 8 feet thereof ; EXCEPT All coal and minerals and the right to explore for and mine the same . AND The north 200 feet of the south 32,1 feet of the east 435 . 8 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast -Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 16 , Township 23 North , Range 5 East , W. M. , EXCEPT the east 30 feet ; Situate ' in the City of Renton , County of King , State of Washington . LEISURE ESTATES - SOUTH ANNEX The west 1 , 326 . 53 feet of the' north 330 feet of the ' Northe'ast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 16 , Township 23 North , Range 5 East , W . M. , EXCEPT the east 30 feet ; ' Situate in the City of Renton , County of King , State of Washington . WHEREAS , the owners of said described property , hereinafter "the property , " desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use , present and future , of .the property : NOW , THEREFORE , the aforesaid owners hereby establish , grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned , their successors , heirs and assigns , as follows : PERMITTED USE Permitted uses of the property shall be limited to the uses allowed in the "T , " Trailer Park Zone as ' specified in Section 4-714 and • -1- Chapter 20, Title IV , Ordinance No . 1628 , Code of General Ordinances , City of Renton , King County , Washington . In the event the subject property is used for any purpose other than those purposes described herein , the Comprehensive Plan designation and the zoning of the subject property shall revert to the designation and zoning presently existing ( single family residential ; G , General Classification District ) . CONTINGENCY These restrictive covenants are solely dependent on the revision of J • the City ' s Comprehensive Plan and rezone. of the subject property , or 00 any part thereof to allow the uses described under the section titled , • "Permitted Use , " contained hereinabove . If the Comprehensive Plan and zone is not changed to permit said use , these restrictive covenants are null and void as to the subject property , or part thereof . DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31 , 2025 unless terminated as described under the section titled , "Contingency , " hereinabove . If any any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants , the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation . Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by said breach . Reasonable attorneys ' fees incurred during an enforcement proceeding will be borne by the parties whom the court determines are in error and shall be entered as a judgment in such action . Dean 11. . Bitatl �onell Btney STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING ) ss On this ; 2 4day of �. �„ � , 1978 , before me person- ally appeared eared DEAN W . BITNEY and JONELL M. BITNEY , his wife , the -2- ' . • persons who executed the within, and foregoing instrument , and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said person for the uses and purposes therein mentioned . IN WITNESS WHEREOF , I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written . CD) - ,e y( . • „ otary Public in and for the state of Washington residing at if.-Z, /e•., • • 16 . o` • fy A`, 9 • 11 OF R •v 0 THE CITY OF RENTON 4v0. MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH: 98055 z o op o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR w LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER O ,. L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593 44.1EO SEPZ°. • November 28, 1978 • Mr. Dean Bitney • 108 Factory Avenue N. Renton, WA 98055 • RE: File No. R-179-78; Dean W. Bitney Request for Rezone. , Dear Mr. Bitney: • This is to notify you that the above referenced request was approved • at the meeting of the Renton City Council of November 20, 1978 by • adoption of Ordinance No. 3264. Sincerely, . // 1)111F L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner • cc: City Clerk Planning Department . eL� Nofr 11978 k CC) Of 1F�k s of/v�Oq `C° V/4-I Renton City Council 11/20/78 Page 2 Old Business Continued Right-of-Way SECOND CLYMER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN REPORT. Upon inquiry by Council- Turnback woman Thorpe, Public Works Director Gonnason explained that upon turnback the City would be responsible for maintenance and if not maintained, the State would deduct costs from gas tax funds: Councilman Stredicke noted the City would then have guarantee of open space. MOTION CARRIED. Utilities The Utilities Committee report recommended Council concur with the Committee Public Works Department and accept the easement from Puget Power Vantage Point which is needed to provide sewer service to Vantage Point Condo- Condominiums miniums by installation of sewer main from NE 5th and Bronson Way Sewer Service to approximately NE 4th and Lakeview Ave. NE. The new sewer would be built within Puget Power's Shuffleton right-of-way and require the easement. The report also recommended that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign the easement. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHANE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented committee Committee Report report recommending second and final readings of the following ordinances which had been on first readings 11/13/78: Ordinance #3262 An ordinance was read extending time for Hearing Examiner' s Hearing Examiner decision from date of hearing 14 days to 30 days in event of Time Extension unusual circumstances. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 4-AYE: CLYMER, STREDICKE, THORPE, PERRY; ONE NO: SHANE. MOTION CARRIED. Ordinance #3263 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property Renton Hill Rezon3 from R-3 to R-1 located on the west side of Cedar Ave. S. between Phase II R-218-78 S. 6th St. and S. 7th St. Councilman Clymer left the Chambers and took no part in any discussion or any action regarding this matter due to conflict of interest. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES: SHANE, STREDICKE, THORPE AND PERRY. CARRIED. (Clymer returned to Chambers. ) Ordinance #3264 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification from G to Bitney Rezone Trailer Park T for property located south of NE 4th St. adjacent R-179-78 to Union Ave. SE and the existing Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park. Committee Chairman Stredicke noted signed restrictive coven- ants were received. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 5-AYE: CLYMER, SHANE, STREDICKE, THORPE AND PERRY. CARRIED. Ordinance #3265 The Ways and Means Committee recommended reading and adoption of an 1979 Amendatory ordinance: amendinq the 1979 Budget Ordinance (#3259) which increases Budget Ordinance amount of taxation. from $3.372 to $3.472 per $1 ,000 and sets the maximum 1979 Levy (based on 106% calculations as required by law) $3,260,727.21 . Following first reading, MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND THORPE, SUSPEND RULES AND ADVANCE ORDINANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL READINGS. CARRIED. Following readings, MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 4-AYE: CLYMER, STREDICKE, THORPE, PERRY; ONE NO: SHANE. MOTION CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND THORPE, THAT THE MATTER OF THE $89,960.21 GRANTED BY THIS COUNCIL ACTION BE REFERRED TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE FOR BUDGET DELIBERATIONS. CARRIED. Street Vacation The Ways and Means Committee recommended first reading of an South 7th St. ordinance vacating a portion of S. 7th St. (VAC 3-78) having width Near Burnett S. of 30 ft. westerly of S. Grady Way near Milmanco, vacation fee of $7,948. 10 paid by Puget Power. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Interties with Chairman Stredicke called attention to resolution authorizing Cities of Kent agreement re interties with the Cities of Kent and Tukwila and Tukwila to provide additional water flow which resolution was referred to the Utilities Committee on 11/6/78. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHANE, IF THE MATTER IS NOT REPORTED BY THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE BY 11/27/78, THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE BE INSTRUCTED TO REPORT. CARRIED. RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting November 20 , 1978 Municipal Building Monday, 8: 0,0 P . M. Council Chambers MINUTES • CALL TO ORDER Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the Renton City Council meeting to order. ROLL CALL OF EARL CLYMER, Council President; !ARLES F. SHANE, RICHARD M. COUNCIL STREDICKE, PATRICIA M. SEYMOUR-THORPE AND GEORGE J. PERRY. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE, EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCIL MEMBERS BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH AND THOMAS W. 'RIMM. CARRIED. CITY OFFICIALS C. J. DELAURENTI, Mayor; DEL MEMC City Clerk; LAWRENCE WARREN, IN ATTENDANCE City Attorney; WARREN GONNASON, Public Works Director; W. E. BENNETT, Deputy Finance Director; RICHARD GEISSLER, Fire Chief; MIKE SMITH, Planning Representative; CAPT. JOHN BUFF, Police Rep. PRESS GREG ANDERSON, Renton Record Chronicle. MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL APPROVE MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 13, 1978 AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Council President Clymer presented Committ of the Whole, Budget Committee of Whole Committee report recommending purchase of new typewriter for the Budget Committee Legislative Department using funds from Legislative Travel and Conference for 1978; also recommending the Fire Department type- writer which will be replaced by the Legislative typewriter, be used for trade-in. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND THORPE, CONCUR IN ; RECOMMENDATION AND REFER THE MATTER TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR RESOLUTION. CARRIED. Building Division The report of the Budget Committee recommended that the matter of Reorganization the Building Department reorganization be referred to the Committee of the Whole and the Planning and Development Committee for review. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOHF1ENDATIOA. Upon inquiry by Councilman Shane, Councilman Perry notes a recom- mendation had been made to committee for one-stop: permit fee. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Shane requested his no vc "' : be recorded. Salary Study The Budget Committee report recommended that all salary adjustments Adjustments included in the 1979 Budget as presented to Council members be referred to the Ways and Means Committee for study along with the salary study made by the Personnel Department. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND CLYMER, CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION, CARRIED. City Attorney The Budget Committee recommended that the Ways and leans Committee conduct a study to determine for the 1980 Budget whether the City should ,obtain the services of a full-time City Attorney or continue with part-time services. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND CLYMER, COUNCIL CONCUR .IN RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Unemployment The Budget Committee recommended that the Ways and Means Committee Compensation establish a cumulative reserve fund for unemployment compensation and prepare the necessary ordinance. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND PERRY CONCUR AND REFER MATTER TO WAYS AND MEANS FOR ORDINANCE. CARRIED. Councilman Shane Councilman Shane made the following motions which failed for lack of a second and requested they be entered into the record: A 2% tax be placed on wagering at Longacres. The City grant up to $50 tax reduction to Senior Citizens who own and live in that home. The City establish standards and advertise for Lily Attorney. Transportation Transportation Committee report noted review of map and agreements Committee pertaining to turnback of State highway right-of-way to the City, explaining the right-of-way was secured by the State in the Kenny- dale area for FAI-405. The committee recommended the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign agreements. MOVED BY STREDICKE NOTICE RENTON CITY COUNCIL will hold a PUBLIC HEARING in RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH ON Monday, Sept. 18 AT 8: 00 P. M. GENERAL LOCATION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: Westerly of Union Ave. SE, vicinity of Heather Downs plat and vicinity of Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park LEGAL DESCRIPTION : (Complete legal description available in Public Records office, City Clerk) For the purpose of considering a proposed Review of the Land Use Comprehensive Plan for possible change in designation. DATE OF PUBLICATION: August 25, 1978 DATE OF POSTING: 8-22-78 SIGNED z , )3„,_.„„e„ Maxine 'E. Motox Deputy City. Clerk • The removal, reuftitlhaitst,ficci:Incritnir: or concealmena r n i n . demeanor p unishable by fine and imprisonment. DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS , DEAN W . BITNEY and his wife , JONELL M . BITNEY , are the owners of the following real property in the City of Renton , County of King , State of Washington , described as follows ; CD LEISURE ESTATES - EAST ANNEX 0 .�.— The westerly 240 feet of the following ; r O The east 435 . 8 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the. Southeast CD Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 16 , Township 23. North , Range 5 East , W. M. , CO EXCEPT the •south 321 feet ; . EXCEPT the north 245 feet ; . EXCEPT the east 30 feet ; EXCEPT all coal and minerals and the right to explore' for and mine the same . • ALSO . . The 'south 2 feet of the north 245 feet of the east 435 . 8 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of the North- east Quarter of Section 16 , Township 23 North , Range 5 East , W . M. , in King County , Washington , lying west of the east 195 . 8 feet thereof ; EXCEPT all coal and minerals and the right to explore for and mine the same . AND The north 200 feet of the south 321 feet of the east 435 . 8 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 16 , Township 23 North , Range 5 East , W. M. , EXCEPT the east 30 feet ; Situate in the City of Renton , County of King , State of Washington . • LEISURE ESTATES - SOUTH ANNEX The west 1 , 326 . 53 feet of the north 330 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 16 , Township 23 • North , Range 5 East , W . M . , EXCEPT the east .30 feet ; Situate in the City of Renton , County of King , State of Washington . WHEREAS , the owners of• said described property , hereinafter " the property , " desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use , present and future , of the property : NOW , THEREFORE , the aforesaid owners hereby establish , grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land' as to . the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned , their successors , heirs and assigns , as follows : PERMITTED USE Permitted uses of the property shall be limited to the uses allowed in• the "T , " Trailer Park Zone as specified in Section 4-714 and rl_ Chapter 20, Title IV , Ordinance No . 1628 , Code of General Ordinances , ' City of Renton , King County , Washington . In the event the subject , property is used for any purpose other than those purposes described • herein , the Comprehensive Plan designation and the zoning of the subject property shall revert to the designation and zoning presently existing ( single family residential ; - G , General Classification District ) . . CONTINGENCY ZD These ' restric'tive covenants are solely dependent on the revision of the City ' s Comprehensive Plan and rezone. of the subject property , or CO any part thereof to allow the uses described under the section titled , • "Permitted Use , " contained hereinabove . If the Comprehensive Plan and zone is not changed to permit said use , these , restrictive covenants are null and void as to the subject property , or part thereof . • DURATION • These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31 , 2025 unless terminated as described under the section titled ,. • "Contingency , " hereinabove. If any any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants , the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity ' of further documentation . Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by said breach . Reasonable • attorneys ' fees incurred during an enforcement proceeding will be borne by the parties whom the court determines' are in error . and shall be entered as a judgment in such action . /I 2/— Dean , Bi t.n • � �onell Bi'tney ' STATE OF WASHINGTON ) / COUNTY OF KING ) ss On this ,N% r4day of �� 1 ,� . , 1978 , before me person- • all eared DEAN W . BITNEY• and JONELL Y aPP M. BITNEY , his wife , the -2- persons who executed the within and foregoing instrument , and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said person for the uses and purposes therein mentioned . IN WITNESS WHEREOF , I . have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written . • '217 kbtary Public in and for the state of Washington residing at irc,, k., M� It • `,�`:� • �- /J 7,p '. • 0w ., , 40.• OF Fe• - A,, �� ., z R o • THE CITY OF RENTON . V c� Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 . 0 mil °v CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER Q L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593 O,Q4'EO SEP1k0' July 11, 1978 . Members, Renton City Council o Renton, Washington.. .. RE: File No. R-179-78; -Dean W. Bitney Rezone Request; Recommendation of the Hearing Examiner. . Dear Council Members: Normally you would receive the complete Examiner's Report and Recommendation at this. time. However, as a result of my analysis of the application and reaching . • findings and conclusions, ' I discovered that in order for a' final recommendation to be reached a decision needs to be made regarding the Comprehensive Plan Land' Use designation for the subject property: In the attached memorandum to the City Attorney the reasons for drawing this conclusion ;are detailed. .Mr. Warren has verbally confirmed my analysis and , ' . conclusion 'concerning the Comprehensive Plan' question. A 'written legal. opinion • will follow shortly. Therefore, it is recommended that the City Council refer to the Planning Commission the determination of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation for the property, which extends to Union Avenue S.E; Once this determination is finally decided • upon by the Council, I will be able to make,, within a few days, . a final recommendation to the Council relative to the requested rezone. This delay the applicant ,is, sincerely regretted and most unfortunate. If the • Examiner should forward a recommendation without the aforementioned determination, its validity would be doubtful and tenuous, thereby jeopardizing any final decision by the City Council regarding the rezone. • . Sincerely. - . L. IRic Beeler • . Hearing Examiner . '- - Attachment • ' • cc: Dean W. Bitney . Parties of Record' •. Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti • . City Attorney, Lawrence J.• Warren Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director, . Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director • Agol.t i ' , 0- R� �.� h. 41 '. 0 CJ 0 4—* x OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY • RENTON,WASHINGTON 8 POST OFFICE BOX 626 100 2nd AVENUE BUILDING • RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 255-8678 0 41- LAWRENCE J.WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY . DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY 0 4!.1E0 SEPltw July 17 , 1978 MEMORANDUM TO: Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner FROM: Lawrence J. WArren, City Attorney 1--Re : Rezone Application No. R-179-78 - DeanW. Bitney Dear Rick: This letter is in response to your Memo on the above captioned matter, and confirming our prior conversations . It is my opinion that the two acre area 'should; ,have been , addressed by the. Planning Commission as a change in the Comprehensive Plan, due to the irregular shape of the Comprehensive Plan and its rather specific dimensions . While the boundaries of areas on a Comprehensive Plan are not' definite , specific lines , but rather graduations , when there is a specifically defined geometric shape set out by the Comprehensive Plan, the zoning authority must take that into account in changing zoning. Therefore, the geometric shape of the Comprehensive Plan should have been considered by the Planning Commission. At this point, a caveat should be expressed. Normally, a very small change in the Comprehensive Plan, such as the one proposed , of only two acres, would not be the proper subject matter for. review by the Planning Commission. However, as previously expressed , due to the unusual geometric shape of the Comprehensive Plan at this particular point, review by the Planning. Commission would appear to be appropriate. It is my fear, that unless the Comprehensive Plan is reviewed, that the rezone application would have a predetermined result. Of course, it would always be appropriate for the Hearing Examiner to review any request for a zoning change. For, example, you could review a request for change in the zoning from the present'. R-1 designation to H-1. Perhaps the result would be preordained, but such a review is always appropriate . However, considering the avenues pursued by the applicant, a. review of the Comprehensive Plan would be appropriate. If you desire any further information on this matter, please feel free to contact me. . ' Lawrence J. ,'Warren LJW: nd cc: Mayor " Council President • '