Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA78-211 • • • ". . . • . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. • . . , . , . • • .. . . . . .. . , . . . , . . .. ,. . . . . . ,„ . . , . . . . . . . . , . . • , . . . • • , . . . . , . • •. . . , . , , . ., . . , • . • , . . , . - , , ... . , . • , • 0 •••• •• . . , . . . . . . ., . , . , . . , • . • • • . .., • • . •• . . . . . . ,. . . , . . . . . . . . . . . , . . • . „ . • . . . • . • :• . . . • . . . • - . , . . •. • . . . • , , . . • . , . , , . . . , . „ . . . . . . , , . . . . . , . „ • • , . . . . , . . . . . . . , . . , . iiiib . .. • . . . . . . • . a y, . . . . , . . . . ... . • . ., .._.: • . .... _ _ , , . , - , .. . . _ ., ...::, .. ... . . ,. . . ! • _ _ . It) . , . . L-o-r3 ... .. • . ,.... , . . • • • . • . . . , , . . . . , . • . .. • . . . , .. . . , . . . _ • • . . , . • • .. . . . . . . . . . , : • •.. . . • . . . . • . • • ,, . . . .. . . . . .. . , , , . . . , . . . .. . , . . .., . . . . , . . . • , • - , . . .. . . . . „ • . . • • . . , , : .. ._ . .• . . . • •. . . . . . • .. . . • , , . . . . . .. . . • . " .. . .. . _. • , . . .. , . ,.., . . . , . .. . , , , , . . . . ., , , , • _ .. . . . . • . • . . . , . . . . . , . , • , ,. , . ., . .. ,.., , . . . ,, , .. . . . ,.. , , ,. , , , , . . , .. . .. „ .. ., . . . . , . • . . , . . . . . . . , . . . • . .., . . , • • . . • • •-• ' • • -•• • : . "- : ' - • ' . I • - • •OXiset-i)4iti • • . . • . •-• • • - ••• '• • 4. . 44 . . ., „ , . • • .. - . RousE •- -,.. .', „ • •. •-• .. - ' . - . N. ' • . . . , ' . . , . RECEIVED . CITY OF RENT®1V • •• HEARING.EXAMINER �+U�2 919Z� . ;..AM PM - • • • - 7i816tMlfi,IGi 1 i2i'l,.41 Des • /QF R� • • • - • • .'•••,i).\-‘ REGF..11,1F4v/\:;. . . ' ' .. r•-' . . . ' " .'. . • '• ' . . , • . . , . AG 4 ►q7Q • • 9 --- ---. _ ; : IB IT .NO. • '' . . • . ' R( ,.. .. • ... ' , ' : . SyRsrA D .- : ' :.- ' ,...''' 1 � -�$, -.• ` . ' -:- ITEM ®w �� �i2 7S .? �� ; General c .:.�.. ;, I� trict(GS-';);al cc 1 , WHEREAS a proper peti- p/ classificationtionfor ofchange sa dof properzone- , ty has been filed with the Planning Department on or • about August 4,1978,which Affidavit of Publication Ipetition was duly referred to ,,the Hearing Examiner for !investigation, study and public hearing,and a public STATE OF WASHINGTON hearing having been held COUNTY OF KING SS. thereon on or about August 29, 1978, and said matter having been duly consi- dered by the Hearing Ex- �7a& I aminer and said zoning re- jy being first duly sworn on 1 quest being in conformity I-with the City's Comprehen oath,deposes and says that is the .. .? of I sive Plan,as amended,and O,a�:� ...C k I considered all matters rele having v THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four(4) iant thereto, and all parties times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred 1 having been heard appear- to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- • �, ing in support thereof or in, paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, opposition thereto, NOW and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained- ' THEREFORE at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Renton THE CITY COUNCIL OF Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the 1 THE CITY OF RENTON, Superior Court of the,County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, WASHINGTON, DO OR- DAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I:The following Washington.That the,annexed is a Ord....3.5.$ described property In the CIty of Renton Is hereby ' rezoned to Suburban Resi- dence No. 1 (SR-1) as hereinbelow.specified;sub- . as it was published in regular issues(and Oct to the findings, conclu- not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period slons and decision dated August 31,1978 of the City's Hearing Examiner;the Plan- ping•Director is hereby au- of 4 consecutive issues,commencing on the thorized and •directed to change the maps of the • day of 19 ,and endinthe • Zonlnq OrdlnanC®, as amended, to evidence said -- - rezoning to-wit: As per exhibit"A"on file 20 Oct 78— In the City Clerk's Office. day of ,19 ,both dates , SECTION II: This Ordl- inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- '� up - scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee • �J��� ion its passage, e,approval and D15- _,on Its passe®e,approval and five(5)'days after its publIca- charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $.gg ,Qwhich , �---- y�''• nd----=�f -- tlOP has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred bens for the CITY OF RENTON,; PASSED BY THE CITY first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent WASHINGTON COUNCIL this 16th day of insertion. I. October, 1978. ORDINANCE NO.3255. Delores A.Mead, AN ,ORDINANCE OF City Clerk THE CITY OF RENTON, \ APPROVED BY THE WASHINGTON MAYOR this 16th day of • Q.'lY C`Z E CHANGING THE ZON- October,1978. ING• CLASSIFICATION Charles J. Delaurentl, OF CERTAIN PROPER- Mayor TIES WITHIN THE CITY Approved as to form: Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2 0 day of OF RENTON FROM Lawrence J.Warren, GENERAL CLASSIFI- CIty Attorney O C t ,19 , -CATION DISTRICT'(GS- Ixubllehed In The Renton i) TO SUBURBAN RE- Record-Chronlcle October , ./13 , SIDENCE NO.•1 (SR-1)(R-211-78) 20, 1978. R6197. — _ �- • Notary Pu • jai and or the State of Washi ton, WHEREAS under Chap ; residing at Kent, King unty. ter 7,Title IV(Building Regu- , • 'atone) of Ordinance No. 1 1628 known as the"Code of General Ordinances of the ' —Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June City of.Renton",as amend- 9th, 1955. ed, and the maps and re- ' ports adopted in conjunction —Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, therewith, the property , adopted by the newspapers of the State. hereinbelow described has - heretofore been zoned as i - V.P.C.Form No.87 .r ._, _ -� --._,�.... __--.,.,.-! f jeL . . • . 0 THE CITY OF RENTON t$ ' Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 z c . 0 ch CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER ID 40' p �Q• , L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593 �li 'EDSEP-0- . • . October 18,• 1978 • ' Mr. Harold Syrstad P.O. Box 24A . • ' Olga, Washington 98279 --- RE:' File No. R-211-78; Harold M. Syrstad Request for Rezone. Dear Mr. Syrstad: ' . • • This is to notify you that, the above referenced request was approved ,. at the meeting of the Renton City Council of October 16, 1978, by . adoption of Ordinance No. 3255. Sincerely • L. Rick Beeler -` �r. e'ic Hearing Examiner �� ' ' �ti r.� J� • cc: Planning Department ? a (-�(�� r3"ty Clerk co C� ,, ® s t��eRC�`�+.a lM1yJ,Ke." Renton City Council 10/17/78 Page 3 Old Business Continued Councilman Shane Motion by Councilman Shane that all city employees' wages be based on cost of living, failed for lack of a second. Motion by Shane to place 2% tax on gambling at Longacres, failed for lack 1t of a second. Utilities Utilities Committee Chairman Shane presented committee report Committee Report recommending concurrence in Public Works Department report Ripley Lane accepting the bid of Frank Coluccio Construction Co. for the Sewer Replacement Ripley Lane replacement sanitary sewer project (S-189) in amount Bid Award 1 of $24,862.81 . MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT AND AWARD BID. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ordinance #3255 )Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented following �H. Syrstad Rezone ordinances for second and final readings: An ordinance read rezoning property located on S.Puget Drive from GS-1 to SR-1 , known as the Harold Syrstad Rezone R-211-78. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #3256 An ordinance was placed on second and final readings rezoning G. Volchok Rezone property located at 22nd St. and SR-167 Valley Freeway from G to Manufacturing Park, known as the Gary Volchok rezone R-212-78. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE, ADOPT ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. First Reading The Ways and Means Committee recommended first reading and referral Ordinances back to committee for the following two ordinances: Cascadia Rezone An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of prop- R-208-78 erty located on Lake Ave. S. between S. Victoria St, and S. 2nd St. from R-1 to B-1 , known as the Cascadia rezone R-208-78. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH, REFER BACK TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. (Restrictive Covenants) A. Bhatia Rezone An ordinance was read rezoning property located at Aberdeen NE R-214-78 between Sunset Blvd. NE and NE 12th St. in vicinity of 951 Aberdeen Ave. NE, from R-1 to R-3 residence district, known as the Arjan Bhatia rezone R-214-78. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Tax Levy Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke noted tax levies � ordinance would be adopted next week, as the material and informa- tion needed is now being received from King County. CONSENT AGENDA These items are distributed to all Council Members for study and are adopted by one motion of the Council without discussion, unless requested. Adopting motion follows items. Damages Claim Claim for Damages was filed by T. W. Parker, Attorney for Henry C. Sasse III, 2004 139th P1 . SE, Bellevue, 'in amount of $2,500 claiming damage to home on Talbot Road. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Carrier. Appointment ! Letter from Mayor Delaurenti announced appointment of Joan Yoshitomi to Municipal Arts Commission completing the term of Harriet Gruhn, effective to 12/31/79. Refer to the Ways and Mean., Committee. Consent Agenda MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA Approval AS PRESENTED.. CARRIED. r l Renton City Council 10/16/78 Page 4 CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT. BUSINESS Development and Letter from Del Bennett, President, Belterra Development Corp. , Subdivision Bellevue, explained that since terminating employment with the City Regulations he has been involved with various governmental jurisdictions in the development of single-family subdivisions. Mr. Bennett noted Revision to the City of Renton is the only governmental agency that requires Current Platting a public hearing on a final plat, which hearing delays the process Process Asked by two months. Mr. Bennett requested opportunity to appear before the Committee as a Whole to suggest policies reducing redtape. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHANE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE REQUEST TO REFER THE MATTER TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. Councilwoman Shinpoch requested that the Administration make written material available with staff input; Mayor Delaurenti being in agreement. CARRIED. ' Appreciation Letter from Service Laundry and Dry Cleaners expressed appreciation of Fire Dept. of the fast action by the Renton Fire Department'' at the occasion of' a fire at their plant. Mayor Delaurenti asked that copy of the letter be furnished the Fire Department. NEW BUSINESS MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND PERRY, FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENTS BE PROVIDED BY THE ADMINISTRATION FOR EACH PROPOSED ANNEXATION. CARRIED. Coun- cilwoman Shinpoch noted her similar request a 'ear ago. First Class Motion by Councilman Shane for study to become first class Status city and ascertain revenue, failed for lack of a second. Councilman Perry noted advantages of being OMC city. Councilman Shane requested Mayor's Assistant make investigation re first class. Adjournment MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND CLYMER, COUNCIL MEETING ADJOURN. CARRIED. 10:20 p.m. ' £ �E' Delores A. Mead, City Clerk of RA,A 0 THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 n rn CHARLES J. DELAURENTI • MAYOR • DELORES A. MEAD 090 CITY CLERK 09gT�D SEP-r����P Octc 'ar 18, 197 °5vr-;tad P. . Pox �� n c a, Washington Eton 98279 i z 10_2 1-78 `vr tad: The Renton City Council, during its regular meeting on Monday, October IG , 1972, has adopted Ordinance 13255. A copy is enclosed for your information. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON Delores A. Mead, C.M. C. City Clerk DAM:jeb Enclosure CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 3255 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING, CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM - _._t ; L CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT (GS-1) TO SUBURBA1 IDENCE NO. 1 (SR-1) CR-211-78) WHEREAS under Chapter 7, Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton", as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as General Classification District (GS-1) ; and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Planning Department on or about August 4, 1978, which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about August 29, 1978, ;�---- and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE j THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Suburban Residence No. 1 (SR-1) as hereinbelow specified; subject to the. findings', conclusions and. decision dated Aup;udt 31, 1978 of the' City's Hearing Examiner'; the Planning ,Director is hereby authoriized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: • • As per Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully, set forth herein SECTION II: This Ordinance shall be effective.upon its passage, approval and five (5) days after its publication. PASSED BY THE• CITY COUNCIL this 16th 'day, of October, 1978. . oZA-r_r.,cv z.• 1 Delores A. Mead, ClIy Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 16tttiay of October, , 1978 Charles Delaurenti., Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. 4r e, City Attorney Date of Publication: ' October 20, 1978 EXHIBIT "A" A TRACT OF LAND SITUATE IN THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. , MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE 1/4 CORNER ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 23 N. , RANGE 5E. , W.M. ; THENCE NORTH 0° 08' 49" EAST ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 20, A DISTANCE OF 635.58 FEET; TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S. 89° 10' 20" WEST A DISTANCE OF 280 FEET MORE OR LESS; THENCE N. 0° 08' 49" E. A DISTANCE OF 155.89; THENCE EASTERLY PARALLEL TO THE EAST AND WEST CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 20, A DISTANCE OF 280 FEET MORE OR LESS; THENCE S. 0° 08' 49" W. A DISTANCE OF 155.89 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Renton City Council 10/2/78. Page 3 OLD BUSINESS Street Closure Councilman Shane registered complaint against closure of Lake Complaint I Washington Blvd. N. by contractor during installation of gas 1 line for Washington Natural Gas Co. , recalling Council had allowed local and emergency traffic. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS • Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented committee Committee Report report recommending second and final readings of an ordinance Ordinance #3253 (first reading 9/25/78) amending the City's Comprehensive Plan Comprehensive re east and south Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park and west of Plan re . 1 Union Ave. Following readings, MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND Leisure Estates SHINPOCH, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ.. Councilman Perry stated Low Density for the record his opposition to covenanting a Comprehensive Plan Multiple amendment, that he would vote for the ordinance but did not want Residential; ' precedent established; further recalling his recommendation for Covenants new colored designator for Comprehensive Plan for mobile homes. Restrict Use'to City Attorney Warren advised the property owners have filed signed Mobile Home Park restrictive covenants which are not a condition of this ordinance. (Not condition ROLL CALL: 5-AYE: CLYMER, TRIMM, SHINPOCH, STREDICKE, PERRY; of Ordinance) ,ONE NO: SHANE. MOTION CARRIED. First Readings The committee report recommended first reading of two ordinances H. Syrstad Rezone as follows: An ordinance rezoning property located on Puget R-211-78 Drive from GS-1 to SR-1 was read. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND G. Volchok Rezone TRIMM, REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR TWO WEEKS. CARRIED. R-212-78 An ordinance was read rezoning property located at SE 22nd St. at SR-167 from G to MP known as the Gary Volchok rezone. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH, REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR TWO WEEKS. CARRIED. Resolution #2218 The committee recommended reading and adoption of a resolution Surplus Vehicles declaring as surplus ten van and pickup trucks from equipment rental fund, to be sold by sealed bid by Purchasing Controller. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND TRIMM, ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Final Payment Councilman Stredicke presented Ways and Means Committee report Olsen Drywall authorizing final payment to Olsen Drywall and Painting Contractors CAG 076-77 for the painting of Highlands elevated tank and Mt. Olivet ($12,125.80) , reservoir; and that after 30 days if no liens or claims are filed against the project and proof of payment of tax liabilities is received, the retained amount of $6,571 .90 be paid the contractor. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH, CONCUR IN REPORT. CARRIED. 1979 Property The Ways and Means Committee report acknowledged receipt of letter Tax Levies - from Bernice Stern, Chairman of the King County Council indicating delay in notification of the 1979 property tax levies extending deadline for submission of the 1979 property tax levies to the County Council by the City as the County certification of assessed valuations unavailable. Code Revisions The Ways and Means Committee report recommended referring the Sewer Hook-up matter of sewer hook-up charges relating to developer extension in the Kennydale area to the Committee of the Whole meeting of 10/12/78 (Code Section 8-717) . MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH, CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are distributed to all Council Members for study and are adopted by one motion of the Council which follows listing of the items: Bid Opening , Grady Way signal system bid opening of 9/22/78; two bids received Grady Way Signals as shown on attached tabulation. Refer to the Transportation Committee. Signals being replaced: Grady Way and Rainier Ave. S. ; two signals on Grady Way at Renton Village. Renton City Council 10/2/78 Page 4 Consent Agenda Continued Appointment Mayor Delaurenti appointed Dan Poli , 420 SW Langston Road, Housing as a Commissioner of the Renton Housing Authority by reason Authority of expiration of the term of Commissioner Louie Gebenini . • Term effective 9/27/78 and expires 9/10/83. Information. Readerboard Letter from Allied Arts of Renton, Rev. John Schaeffer, President, Carco Theatre , presented to the City, the readerboard now installed at a site at the entrance to Cedar River Park to inform the public of activities at Carco Theatre. The letter noted the community contributions of money and time toward the project. Mayor and Council President acknowledge contributors. Salary and Letter from Finance Director Marshall requested transfer of funds Benefit for 1978 salary and benefit adjustments in amount of $245,562 Adjustments finalized after budget adoption including union contract settle- 1978 ments for Police, Fire, 21-R and adjustments for Management, Super- visory, ' Exempt and Non-Represented employees as allowed by Council . Letter from Finance Director Marshall requested appropriation from excess revenue in amount of $30,010 and $11 ,243 from Water- works Utility and Firemen's Pension Excess Revenue for salary, and benefit and miscellaneous adjustments. Refer both letters to the Ways and Means Committee for appropriate ordinance and resolution. Police Letter from Mayor Delaurenti appointed Garry Anderson as Renton Appointment Police Officer effective 10/16/78 subject to customary six-month probationary period. The appointee replaces George Conklin who has been granted disability retirement. ;Concur. Talbot Hill Letter from City Clerk.Mead reported receipt of 75% petition Island for annexation of Talbot Hill Island; petition certified valid. Annexation by the Planning Department who report signatures thereon represent ownership of 85.93% 'of the assessed valuation, at least 75% required by- law. The letter noted circulation of the petition was authorized at preliminary meeting on 2/14/77 at which time owners agreed to accept the Comprehensive Plan, zoning and the assumption of any pre-existing bonded indebtedness. Public Hearing The letter recommended 11/6/78 be set for public hearing on the 11/6/78 . proposed annexation. Council concur. Consent Agenda MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND CLYMER, APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. Approved CARRIED. (10:00 p.m. ) Utility Billing Letter from Mayor Delaurenti presented request from H. J. Austin Collections of Austin's Rexall Pharmacy, 220 Wells Ave. S. , requesting an Rate increase from 5¢ to 7¢, each for utility collections made on behalf of, the City.\ The Mayor's letter advised the Finance Director reports 7¢ currently budgeted for this purpose and recommended referral to the Ways and Means Committee for draft- ing new agreement between City and Austin's Rexall Pharmacy. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDA- TION AND REFER TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS ' Councilman Perry commended Mayor Delaurenti ' s freeze on staff Hiring Freeze . spending. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND STREDICKE, Council place Attempted freeze on all hiring effective today until after the final budget has been adopted. MOTION FAILED. Council Upon inquiry by Councilman Stredicke,re violation of disclosure Endorsements laws by King County Council Members after endorsing or promoting' a ballot issue, City Attorney Warren noted any endorsement must be of non-political ballot issue which would: be difficult to find or as an individual in order to avoid violation. Councilman Stredicke requested report from the City Attorney. Policewoman Upon inquiry by Councilman Shane, City Attorney. Warren advised that the Policewoman, subject of court case, is presently serving as Police Officer. , { P.' '2-r-Q-/ Renton City Hall 9/25/78 Page 4 Consent Agenda Continued Damages Claim Claim for Damages was filed by Kyle S. Janders in amount of $17.39 for paint damage to his leather jacket alleging non- marking of City Park Department freshly painted swings. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Carrier. Rezone R-211-78 Hearing' Examiner Beeler recommended approval of request by Harol Harold Syrstad M. Syrstad for rezone from GS-1 to SR-1 , property located on the north side of Puget Dr. SE, 350 ft. east of Grant Ave. S. and adjacent to the Rolling Hills subdivision. Refer to Ways and Means Committee for ordinance. Rezone R-212-78 Hearing Examiner Beeler recommended approval of request of Gary Gary Volchok Volchok for rezone from G to MP, property along the west side of East Valley Road near SW 21st. Refer to the Ways and Means Committee for ordinance. Consent Agenda MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA Approved AS PREPARED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Firemen's Pension Letter from the Firemen's Pension Board, City Clerk Mead Secretary, Board re reported Board concurrence in the 1978 Actuarial Report pre- Funding pared by Milliman and Robertson, Inc. and requested that the Council consider allocation of tax dollars for the pension fund in accordance with recommendations of the actuarial . Letter from Fireman William J. Henry representing Firefighter Members of the Board requested City start funding the Pension Fund at acceptable level . MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE, COUNCIL REFER THE LETTERS TO THE BUDGET COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Final Payment Letter from Public Works Director Gonnason requested final pay- Highlands Tank ment (CAG 076-77) repainting of Highlands elevated tank and the and Reservoir Mt. Olivet reservoir, noting project acceptance of the Olsen Painting Brothers Drywall and Painting Co. on 7/15/78 by the department. The letter recommended Council acceptance of the project 9/25/78 and final payment in amount of $12,125.80. The letter also recom- (30 day waiting mended the retained amount of $6,571 .90 be paid the contractor if period for no liens or claims are filed against the project and proof of release of payment of tax liabilities is received. Discussion ensued noting retained the attractivenespof the painted items and color chosen by amount) Municipal Arts Commission; also claims filed against City on behalf of paint damage to private property. The City Attorney noted claims were being handled by the insurance carrier of the contractor. MOVED BY THORPE, SECOND CLYMER, REFER THE LETTER TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK TO INVESTIGATE AND MAKE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. CATV Expansion Letter from Public Works Director Gonnason reported that Tele- prompter Cable TV Co. (as required by Ordinance No. 3137) has submitted their proposed expansion plan 1978 through 1980 indi- cating proposed area locations for new service and Teleprompter' s existing service area. The letter recommended plans be accepted as proposed. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED THORPE, REFER THE MATTER TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE TO MEET WITH CABLE TV OFFICE. CARRIED. City Code Letter from the Board of Public Works Director Gonnason recom- Changes mended changes to the City Code including addition to Title IV, Chapter I , Uniform Building Code of inspection, approval and fees (4-105) and included in the recommendation: proposed revision to Title IX, Chapter 11 , Renton Subdivision Ordinance (9-1108) Inspection, approval and fees. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL REFER THE RECOMMENDATION TO THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE FOR REVIEW AND REPORT BACK TO COUNCIL. CARRIED. Councilwoman Shinpoch requested figures on County building permits, as well as Tukwila and Kent. (1)is R.eA Airflow 0 THE CITY OF RENTON `O MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 51 0 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER p kQ` L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593 41co SEP1t�� September 15, 1978 Mr. Harold Syrstad P.O. Box 24A Olga, Washington 98279 RE: File No. R-211-78; Harold M. Syrstad 'Request for Rezone. Dear Mr. Syrstad: This is to notify you that the above referenced request, which was approved as noted on the Examiner's report of August 31, 1978, has not been appealed within the time period set by ordinance, and therefore, this ordinance is being submitted to the City Clerk for transmittal to the City Council for final approval. You will receive notification of final approval upon adoption of an ordinance by the City Council. Si -lye -oar .. . L. Rick1Beeler Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk Of 4 s3 o THE CITY OF RENTON 7. MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 z io op CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER Ap 0_'i L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593 •P'tED SE P-0 September 7, 1978 Members, Renton City Council Renton, Washington RE: File No. R-211-78; Harold M. Syrstad Request for Rezone. Dear Council Members:. : Attached is the Examiner's Report and Recommendation on the referenced rezone application, dated August 31, 1978. The appeal period for the request, expires on September 14, 1978, and the report is being forwarded to you for review by the Planning and Development Committee following the seven-day period from the date of publication. The complete file will be transmitted to the City Clerk on September 15, 1978, and will be placed on the Council agenda on September 25, 1978. If you require additional assistance or information regarding this matter, please contact the undersigned. Sincerely, L. ick Beeler Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk Attachment — , 02021c/(7„,,co 444 Via, C.; ��4, ��95V�2 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING C State of Washington) • County of King ) Marilyn J. Petersen , being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 31stday. of August , 1978 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. Subscribed and sworn this 3\ - day of Nu tvist • 19 -C:4 . • • • \(„W Notary Public in and for the State , of Washington, residing at Renton Application, Petition or Case: Harold M. Syrstad, R-211-78 (The m:i,nu teb contain a tat o .the pate og netond) August 31, 1978 OFFICE OF l HE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICANT: Harold M. Syrstad FILE NO. R-211-78 LOCATION: . `:North side of Puget Drive S.E. approximately 350 feet east of Grant .Avenue South and adjacent to the Rolling Hills subdivision. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests approval of a rezone to SR-1 to allow 7 future subdivision of the subject site. SUMMARY OF. Planning Department: Approval subject to conditions. RECOMMENDATION: Hearing Examiner: Approval. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department staff report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on August 23, 1978. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property' and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on August 29, 1978 at 9:40 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building, Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. Michael Smith, Planning Department, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional exhibit into the record: Exhibit #2: King County Assessor's Map Mr. Smith referenced various city departmental comments attached to Exhibit #1 which he added to the Planning Department recommendation. The Examiner asked the applicant if he concurred in Exhibit #1. Responding was: Harold Syrstad P.O. Box 20 .S1R' Olga, Washington 98279 Mr. Syrstad indicated h'is concurrence in the report. The Examiner referred to conceptual short plat maps which had been displayed by Mr. Smith during his presentation, and inquired if the, applicant desired to enter the maps into the record. Mr. Syrstad referenced a comment by Mr. Smith during his oral presentation regarding requirements for a 75-foot lot width in the SR-1 zone, noting a 70-foot lot width denoted on the conceptual short plat map. Mr. Smith confirmed the minimum width requirement. Mr. Syrstad indicated that, due to recent commitment of sale of the existing residence on Lot 3, revision to lot width on the remaining two proposed lots would not be possible. The Examiner advised that because the purpose of the hearing was review of the rezone request, the short plat maps would not be entered into the record, but reserved for subsequent public hearings to review the proposed subdivision of property. R-211-78 Page Two division of the lots would require an additional rezone application or a request for exception from the Subdivision Ordinance for pipestem configuration through the interior of the site. Since lengthy discussion had occurred regarding the possible subdivision of the lot, the Examiner entered the conceptual short plat map into the record as Exhibit #3. Following additional discussion regarding possible zoning and subdivision alternatives, it was determined by the Examiner and the applicant to proceed with the hearing to expedite review of the current rezone request. The Examiner also advised that no time limit was imposed for reapplication for rezone, and that variance from the 75-foot minimum lot width was within the jurisdiction of the Board of Adjustment. The Examiner asked Mr. Smith if concerns regarding access onto Puget Drive from the subject site had been reviewed. Mr. Smith indicated concern by staff due to the vertical curve on the roadway east of the site and the volume of traffic utilizing Grant Avenue at the intersection of that street and Puget Drive. He reviewed existing access limitations from established developments along Puget Drive and felt that impact from two additional driveways would not be significant although the matter would be further reviewed during hearings regarding future subdivision of the property. Responding to the Examiner's inquiry, Mr. Smith reported that comments from the Traffic Engineering Division had not been received regarding concerns related to potential access onto Puget Drive. The Examiner requested further comments. Since there were none, the hearing on File No. R-211-78 was closed by the Examiner at 10:10 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The request is for a rezone of approximately one acre from GS-1 to SR-1. 2. The Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues, applicable policies and provisions, findings of fact, and departmental recommendations in this matter, is uncontested, and is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference as set forth in full therein. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended by R.C.W. 43.21.C. , a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development and no adverse comment was expressed. 5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 6. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. 7. The proposal is compatible with the required setbacks, lot coverage and height requirements of Section 4-704 (SR-1) of Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances. 8. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map indicates that the subject property lies in the'border area of Low Density Multiple Family and Single Family Residential Districts. Potential exists for the property to be classified in either district (Section 4-3014. (B) ) . 9. Since the previous land use analysis of the area and the property, (which assumedly occurred several years ago) reclassification has occurred and development begun on the northerly and easterly abutting properties (Section 4-3014. (C) ) . This reclassification was to R-2 on the easterly portion of the properties abutting the • • R-211-78 Page Three upon the existing single family property; thereby obviating the need for a more intense land use than, single family residential. The adjacent ,Rolling Hills neighborhood is zoned SR-1. A reclassification of the abutting subject site to the same zoning category would protect against ". . .unwarranted infiltration of. incompatible uses which would. . .prevent the development of orderly growth patterns. " (page 17, Objective No. 1, Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Report, July, 1965) . , This would also protect the property values in the area (Ibid, • Objective No.' 4) . • Very accurately the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map indicates that the property might fit into either the Single Family or Low Density Multifamily category. A reclassification to SR-1 would produce the least impact upon adjacent existing development: . However, it is less clear whether or not SR-1 represents the ". . . highest and best use. . ." while promoting ". . .the best interest of the community. . . " (Ibid, page 18, Objective No. 6) in view of the rezone decisions concerning the northerly and easterly abutting properties. But it can reasonably be concluded that the requested SR-1 more appropriately fulfills this objective than the existing zoning of ,GS-1. 2. Development of the northerly and westerly abutting property per R-3 and R-2 zoning, the southerly property across S. Puget Drive per R-2 zoning and the southeasterly .property per ,SR-1 zoning (Parkwood South) produce significant impact upon the • property since any previous land use or zoning analysis (Section 4-3014. (C) ) . This development combined with the isolation' (island) of the property between R-3, R-2 and SR-1 "zoning categories indicate the timeliness of the requested rezone to SR-1. 3. In order for the applicant to, subdivide the property a short plat is required. At that time dt appears more appropriate to consider the staff recommendation of retention of existing trees. Information was not 'presented, based upon the Comprehensive Plan, to justify so conditioning the rezone. More detail normally accompanies the short plat application. RECOMMENDATION: • Based upon the record, testimony, findings and conclusions, it is the Examiner's recommendation that the City Council reclassify the property from GS-1 to SR-1. ORDERED THIS131st day of August, 1978. r , L. Ri k Beeler • Land Use Hearing Examiner • TRANSMITTED THIS 31st day of August, 1978 by Affidavit of Mailing to the party of record: ' • Harold M. Syrstad, P.O. Box' 2489, Olga, WA 98279 TRANSMITTED THIIS 31st day of August, 1978 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Councilwoman Patricia Seymour-Thorpe Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director a., R-211-78 Page Four An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the City Clerk's office, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in said office. • • ,\ • col•t. d i 7 _.._..wa. 1 1 GS- ! r z . -j co,................... ..01 , . . ; , . . . ` i— 4 r e,. .r4 a ,,8%r:,; ...., / ,. `..•• '\'... • �.'r'le�p•�{• f (fIfl t'I�lrIL,MIV[M \, a.y1. �tf .. �Op~ p W : 1 IS ♦'1 T. I •7 1 •t .:f... —;T .�:•. ;off. :5��. AK •. . : .E �; `,j, o . 1 ' B I I I •. - � -`�-N� _-•'a'• /��. '�• ,�ti��!a i...; a i.f i.NY�".i(:. • , r �•!• 'n,.�r1,.1n.,a; ;f, • R3 't i _ .> . ;\ :q �` •„� , • Y • .� :}'. •-♦' :•nil." ,i'.••:�1�.4/C, .F O r •'° ^•{+s • .. ,•• .,t• r BJf'c; ;' ;R'3 l,� "i I I s; . S11E• ; ! z . . , • ),,,i .\ L......._......7.,... ...L.• . _14 ' : .. ' . : (1711 G-7200 1'1 :: • `�1 f2 J x r ��• ,fit• hi • -... ..r _ •�%Q1 f�1�/�� i 'mo-1-..L-.-. "�, Ivy ��� �t — i•f y • .•: :I] . zriw S, -T f-_ r r - 'i �• 1 I I i _-1 1 I i "Ll s t i� 57 r�Z7W`' A :. ��'.,. 1 1 •:I 1 ! ,__1 , • ` `� L i 9 • - ra.N.,N.,.. uN•. ss • Is • • , • Try: tl • , r . r �JJi - ..`.6, •,� F i� :.,I • - �e lee▪ w eT, e ..' .J°,. : , • . • t • 1t a i A 1A `i1.77..\;;;,, ' REZONE . •. HAROLD M. SYRSTAD, REZONE FROM GS-1 TO SR-1, FILE NO. R-211-78; property located on north -side of Puget Drive S.E. approximately 350 feet east of Grant Avenue South and adjacent to the Rolling • Hills subdjvision. APPLICANT Harold M. Syrstad TOTAL AREA ±1 acre I PR I roc: I PAL ACCESS Grant' Avenue South and Puget Drive. S.E. F X S.r I NG ZONING GS-1 (Residential Single Family) • EXISTING USE Undeveloped I / a Q/ D Ei • a Iy,, i ,,•• // ca a • in 1 .\, ,� O •• /,42i .0* ./ ' CI . _ i O 1> .4 a ,.O.;, 0 . . CI go Et _\, • i ' . , .,6 ., ❑ : • \C \1 . .\ . 6 \ . • . \,_.,. . .\._. ._ ,,.,,,, . • \.. Are .,\, . (.). 1\k,,),1 ‘.1):R\.‘ W\1E9, . ..0. 0 4 • • , Pub • _ 1 . i 1 �f \ r I. 1 .......---1 Ni • I I 11 • \ . L\:-- \ - .- - I -LI ,_._ ir . II t \ H \ j! I � \ - \ II, \ I; . ,'/ \ . \ i • ► li . •.. i� \. .. . __.. _ . _ .. _ -- A SCALE: 1"=200' 'j' RECEIVED I ' PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY ®E RENT®: H fNG EXAMjNER PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER AUc 1978 PUBLIC HEARING 7��,.9110.11�l2e�o2i3'►4o5 AUGUST 29, 1978 �����r� :T;,1 Q j,; APPLICANT;: Harold M. Syrstad-ITEM .N ` � FILE NUMBER: R-211-78, REZONE FROM GS-1 TO SR-1 A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: 1 Applicant requests approval of a rezone to SR-1 to allow future sub- ; division of the subject site. 1 ' B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1 1. Owner of Record: Harold M. Syrstad 2. Applicant: Harold M. Syrstad 3. Location: . North side of Puget Drive S.E. approxi- mately 350 feet east of Grant Avenue South and adjacent to the Rolling Hills sub- division. 4. Legal Description: A detailed legal description is available ;.1 on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5. Size of Property: ±1 acre, 6. Access: Via Puget Drive'S.E. I 7. Existing Zoning: GS-1, Single Family Residence District 1 f 8. Existing Zoning in the Area: GS-1, General Classification District; j ; SR-1,iSuburban Residence District; R-2, Residence District; R-3, Residence I District. 1i ; i 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Low Density Multiple Family Residential i � 10. Notification: The applicant was notified in writing of ii the hearing date. Notice was properly . published in the Record Chronicle and [.i posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance. J ' ry C. PURPOSE. OF REQUEST: h To provide proper zoning for future subdivision and development. I' 1 D. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The site is the remaining ownership of Mr. Syrstad after sale of adjacent [, parcels north and west to Condominium Builders, Inc. , and was not included 1 in the subsequent rezone and special permit for that property. 1� PLANNING OLPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: HAROLD .M. SYRSTAD, FILE NO. R-211-78 AUGUST 29, 1978 PAGE TWO 2. Soils: Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam (AgC). Permeability is mod- erately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil , and very slow in the substratum. Runoff is slow to medium and the erosion hazard is mod- . erate. 3. Vegetation: Significant growths of evergreen and deciduous trees exist along the north and east borders of the property. The rest of the site is a mixture of some medium shrubs and considerable scrub grass. • 4. Wildlife: Existing vegetation on the site may provide suitable habi- tat for birds and small mammals. 5. Water: There is no existing water on the subject site. 6. Land Use: An existing single family residence is located on the westerly portion of the subject site with the remainder of the site undeveloped. The Rolling Hills single family residential subdivision is located directly adjacent to the easterly boundary of the site. An existing townhouse multiple family development is located south of the subject site across Puget Drive. Parkwood South single family subdivision is located southeast of the site. The property west and north of the site is presently undeveloped. However, plans for a condominium development have been approved. F. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: Mixture of multiple family and single family residential . G. PUBLIC, SERVICES: 1. Water and Sewer: Existing 12-inch and 16-inch water mains run east- west along Puget Drive and a 12-inch main is located on Grant Avenue. An 8-inch sanitary sewer is located on Grant Avenue approximately 750 feet to the northwest of the subject site. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the Renton Fire Department per code re- qulirements. (See attached Fire Department comments. ) 3. Transit: METRO Transit Route 145 operates along Benson Road South within 4 mile to the west of the subject site. 4. Schools: The subject site is located approximately one mile northeast of Talbot Hill Elementary School and 4 mile north of. the Fred Nelsen Junior High School , while Renton Senior High School is within two miles to the north. 5. Parks: Phillip Arnold Park is located approximately 2 mile north of the subject site, while Talbot Hill Park is about one mile west and Tiffany Park is within one mile to the east. H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-704, SR-1, Single Family Residence District. 2. Section 4-706, R-1, Single Family Residence District. PLMINING UI P/IRTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT iv BEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: HAROLD M. SYRSTAD, FILE NO. R-211-78 AUGUST 29'1, 1978 PAGE THREE I . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: Comprehensive Plan, 1965, Land Use Report, Objective 6, p. 18. J. IMPACT ON THE NATURAL SYSTEMS: Rezone of the site will not have a direct impact. However, future devel- opment of the site will disturb existing soils, increase storm water runoff and have an effect on traffic and noise levels in the area. However, these can be considered minor through the establishment of proper development controls and ordinance requirements. K. SOCIAL IMPACTS: Minimal L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, RCW 43-21C, a negative declaration of environmental impact has been issued. This declaration is conditional upon the retention of as many existing trees on the site as possible per Renton Planning Department approval . M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: A vicinity map and a site map are attached. 1 N. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1. City of Renton Building Division. 2. City of Renton Engineering Division. 3. City of Renton Traffice Engineering Division. 4. City of Renton Utilities Division. 5. City of Renton Fire Department. Copies of interdepartmental comments are attached. 0. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. The proposed rezone (single family residential ) is a lesser intensive land use than that indicated on the comprehensive plan land use map element (low density multiple family residential ). However, it can be considered compatible with the comprehensive plan and existing single family residential uses and zoning in the area. Sufficient buffering was included in the approval of the proposed condominium project west and north of the site to provide compatibility between that use and the proposed rezone. However, more suitable ultimate, use of the subject site may be R-2. 2. The applicant proposes to subdivide the subject site into three par- cels. This will require approval of a short plat by the Hearing PI_ANN I NG I11.PAR IMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT 'iv HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: HAROLD M. SYRSTAD, FILE NO. R-211-78 PAGE FOUR' P. PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of rezone to SR-i based on the above analysis subject to preservation of as many trees as possible per no. 4 above. No clear- ing of the site shall be permitted without prior approval of the Planning Department. Y - PROPOSED/FINAL L4..LARATION OF SIGNIFICANCEi _--N-SIGNIFICANCE Application ,No . R-211-78 0 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . 373-78 El FINAL Declaration Description !of proposal Applicant requests rezone from GS- 1 , Single Family Residence District (minimum lot size 35 ,000 sq . ft. ) , to SR- 1 , Single Family Residence District (min . lot size 7 , 500 sq . ft. ) . Proponent _ Harold M. Syrstad North side of Puget Drive S . E . , approximately 350 feet Location of Proposal east of Grant Ave . S . and adjacent to the Rolling Hills subdivision . Lead Agency 1 Renton Planning Department This proposal has been determined to 0 have Q not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS ❑ is Ellis not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) ( c ) . This decision was ma-de after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmentalhsngnificance : The declaration of non-significance is for the rezone request only and does not apply to any specific development plan . The proposed request isicompatible with the Comprehensive Plan . Measures , if. any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its ; declaration of significance and issue a ( proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : 1 At the time of development the applicant will be required to comply with the requirements of the SR-1 zone. Responsible Official Gordon Y . Ericksen Title Planni s Dir,'ctor ,doir ',ate August 22 , 1978 Signature � .Ari.Tt _ .� City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : O Finance Department Fire Department Library Department OPark Department Police Department Public Works Department 0 Building Div. . 0 Engineering Div . ,�fp Traffic Engineering Div . 01`� ® Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or This designee ) . S• Q u c I ltmsol DATE : V/0/7,9 PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR: REZONE MAJOR PLAT SITE APPROVAL SHORT PLAT SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT OR EXEMPTION AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE 8/2/77e REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 1)C.,-.0 6 144rmcv c A09464/1-6vE" Co'Imments : i 1 i (,>‘--- .,., , c--- /Z-Z-V--y-o-,ez___ X-(r-?/ Signature off i ctor or Authorized Representative Date i REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : --" yX f j O'V /lit E C. [JC SAPA<1 Q l''e— Co'mments : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Lr PFAcve rot►.T Comments : / � Q „i r Gil / l.�/6/7�'�) S/C l£1C7��/� ytO�►� .�Vvs"De 10d 1) v,a t? �! .5i �� �i�j/mil! ./ 1/,7/Gs7 ) •e —�11,��1f7G�ii �`—/7 Signature o l/,irecto or Autho Zed Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : pt�< S Comments : !•A +�; corr.EA5 I '( /2-'1 ,a ?x1- I p..l 4r lf' T I Signature of 'Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 7r /4 AI 1 _.EP. Comments : ,jt/ yid, /76) Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : E ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO : O Finance Department IIIFire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department OPublic Works Department Building Div. Engineering " Div. ® Traffic Engineering Div. ® Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department, (signed by responsible official or his designee) < Q fAUY1.5.Oh , SUBJECT: Review of ECF- 3767P ; Application No . : R- dir--7d' 'Action Name : Rezo,i .R fUPSl o ( i ol1 -5yr$110-4 "o ,-S--1 lii SR-I Please review the attached. Review requested by (date) : g/o?//78 Note : Responses to be written in ink. 1 REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPTMENTS : Department : ) -D (-, - Comments : tZA,LA °VE L�,O/Sft�°��40(/E 1 I , r• / AAL.,--c.--_ Signature of�D ' or or Authorized Representative Date / ' REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : �y . f1P6kfev tzp ,ovs11,°/0.4oc"6 Comments : r 0 A 1 A6 JI r /L - • Li F C r- . --`y` c-i-i-j - . . .., REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 90/S /e0 I/e...:-- Comments : •-:--'3:-/c.),—/-7-7 -/-,-,- /ic,--71"7- /.,te"/-ee.7.1-c-- rse,7z//i-e , 0/2-5-./7/6-' 0-r.. ' s•;•71 e_ ; kv,-F,..a v e JG,e.,:fs- ( 8 - /7- .7o / .:27--/x..,/ /---/"--7 -:7 Signatye of Dia4ector or thori zed Representative i.- Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : AP/WO ir-E" UGV.5."`',X 0 &--- . Comments : Signature of : Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 7—ie..Al.F I-7/c F N (:-) ew 4,--: 4:-i:-::-:' 1 41 6 CoMments : 4 //I Y,Ii)1,)C2.- ZT n / • i ti . 7k---',- <,•'; '4.7:::::-.)" - .r.) Signature of Director or Authorizdd Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : . Department : , Comments : . . . • - I - a „.i.e • r 4,,,, , . _ ----7-s,,:,‘ • 4• S- .., R.714, I . . I •'! laF � i • � z\ -/ \ , `a-r 4 in ' 1\ , µ •8• 9;lot I-12,131'•:I5•a II,181912021t Trot • ( .13 S 14 v -2223 .r=T� ., T,.\1"�' 69- ; ` , '•y\ ` �\ 6 T ( ' t;,'\ c�"•e' 1 ot,z 27 I' 9 7 �'i5 \\~` ' o' h °Q I% 1' �Y Z o 10 �r 1 2'Jc Ti'3 ��T , 1 1 —f—BT„ T. r„ /U©� .a• \''r'cs\I'.\\ °' ' • 1 \\ � -3• \>, ',© - 1�' ' `<// /'\- ems � ever ( ,` , \ -- - -._. --'�,- ,'• R ro,.\.,' - •((ra p.4E r ,' I '�tt\\,••'1.: ••• TTj t l n u a.-'6411 ®m , -_- F-. ---<a `____ �� ._.•' i"� .1._L © YID ft�~S./e� 7 r:a �er .•O't• 5 'f t e.to — 22w.T. , a . �7 JSthyrdG t60 Y ;STC \ fi. se 1 SI7E• I W 2z , lirrf1 7 SE 16 ,T s x. _ rI \• 1 e firJ±IIt / I , 5 8 i \‘`,. \\\\\•\ 3— • , ,---—4-- _ 3.'.." 7E5: ' 3.27TM--l7. _. . Ile \ - c\ ,--. — u n u �ufix. u _—__ _ _ — 27TN SST/ �f _ Fr- r♦ rf r` !I ft x ,. T n •A /� 11'� L� _ \ e •`' ' -T_ a c,.�r 1E. le4e a5. A I • �TH."t'1 N - 'r_ f \\� • t I j .,IA 1,i41,14r 4.N M f I 7s�e�e b f , CBE .1,7 j ,:�, ��- ---- •TM >_- - '6 °• / �r1j°rxlr,f,a17+ r. rs l ' �� Q ♦ 9 r a t� ---- � •!ii\ h. • !C 163Te ST }9 9 "? q°J9 • A jar ° \ \ .:.. • .. " T'.., .1wl.ret.. »i5F't1w1 REZONE . HAROLD M. SYRSTAD, REZONE FROM GS-1 TO SR-1, FILE NO. R-211-78; I property located on north side of Puget Drive S.E. approximately 350 feet east of Grant Avenue South and adjacent to the Rolling Hills subdivision. 1 I APPL I CANT; Harold M. Syrstad • TOTAL AREA ±1 acre • PRINCIPAL'I ACCESS Grant Avenue South and Puget Drive S.E. EX? S." ING 'ZONING GS-1 (Residential Single Family) 1 . EXISTING USE , Undeveloped 1 PROPOSED USE SR-1, Residential. Single Family COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Low Density Multiple Family COMMENTS I . 1 • • I 1 _. ,_S. J / a El a F. El Q a 1 / tO 4 l',.. % fir; '; ;; � 0 0 V. o 0 OP a p CI O. ,,, g 1111 i . o. oc o , \-• , .% L_ _ _ 0 •. , \ ,...,,,,_, I,...,,, _ \ , , ..._.___, 3 0. ...4, \ 3u•/6 2€4,a9 QC \ 0 S \ # .2 t +,,, D - O n ,\■...- i P u ___------ \ -r---r ___ \ .1) R W E ' \ , I I _ \ I1 , i \ ...,, , 1 \ \ - - - ---+ I I il ,\ 1 , 1 --. 3.\__ __.\. ...__.. _. _..._ __ ....J _.... Lr. 1 I I I , 1 \ ,1 II \ 1 I � I \I I 1 � \ II II 1 I � �\ \ I I \ I XI I ,l //I \ \ \ \ I 1 t a• ' f. _ suedroT Si7E03 f ig MAROL-,D SYRSTAD REZONE R.-211-78 V aECF_Ill�a CITY OF RENTON '` C • REZONE APPLICATION sue 4 1978 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY I : LAND USE HEARING .9 APPLICATION NO. k-dI1-78 EXAMINER 'S ACTION APPLICATION FEE v/ID,wc APPEAL FILED 414_ Ptk RECEIPT NO. .9132 CITY COUNCIL ACTION .`,. FILING DATE -L}- ] j ORDINANCE . NO. AND DATE ' HEARING DATE • ti APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 10 : L�n Po �l si/RC i/a T�l . Name ��4 � Phone 276, --24/ // Address .5'_TA rho UTr RoY C>2-lo11, w. ez.�a74 . 3. Property petitioned for rezoning is located on between 6IPA ti% ,A- U e. and fni D L.L/iV , /L L-S 4 . Square footage or acreage of property l AO. i C ` 5 . Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet) err : xi 6 . Existing Zoriinq Zoning Requested 5 P - ) • NOTE TO APPLICANT : , The following factors are considered in reclassifying ;. Evidence or additional information to substantiat property. your request may be attached to this sheet. (See Applicatio Procedure Sheet for specific requirements . ) Submit this for :;' , in duplicate. 7. Proposed use of site 1p.,-SI op_TL.' s/u&LE F ,E . , 1t . 8. List the measures to be taken to reduce impact on the surrounding area. 9 . How soon after the rezone is granted do you intend to develop the site? A.) 0 PLA iu S 0 . Two copies of plot plan and affidavit of ownership are required. Planning Dept . 1-77 F1 ,//-*-6V Rt/V->x AFFIDAVIT �+d18 I , /�14 P 0L[ 7-A j) , being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this /14 day of , 19 71 Notary Public in d or the State of Washington, residing at e.bit a.l Cdady 4,e,}(,,_ 6,A) dx-gA-6-4 ) (Name of Notary Public) (Signature of Owner7_1 ) e12 11) 5 %J�r' oc�ir_ RoY.24EA Address) (Address) (51_6A WA , gS27 (City) (State) (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application . Date Received , 19 By: Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON LF �l �� ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM y � � D APP, 4 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY c� �•� DEP Application No. �>r`� 4-�11-70 Environmental 'Checklist No. £C F 7s° PROPOSED, date: , FINAL , date: EjDeclaration of Significance ® Declaration of Significance Declaration of Non-Significance Ei Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers, include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional -pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- , ,out unnecessary delay. , The following questions apply to. your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental. review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACKGROUND '� ,{ 1. Name of Proponent ,4J.; /4, F_c'7 A 2. Address and phone number of Proponent:" PCB?42 ,A 4 OL1,4/411/A r g,-9 7 3. Date Checklist submitted 4. Agency requiring Checklist . /I-A Ai Ali U. OF PAR T l=' Ai'% 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : - -2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : A6r?r A- p/ 7 OR. A v GP A L' T A L' 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal (federal , state and local --including rezones) : 10. Do you have any plants for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: PC) 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the proPerty covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none• has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) (1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? r/ YES MAYBE N0 (b) Disruptions, displacements , compaction or over- covering of the-soil? YES MAYBE NO (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief , features? YES MAYBE W (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? WAYEEN� ' (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , - either on or off the site? YES M—TYTtr NO (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? YES MAYBE HT— Explanation: - i -3- (2) Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? YES MAYBE NO (b) The creation of objectionable odors? U yrs- MAYBE NO (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? VS MAYBE AC— Explanation: . (3) Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? VET— MAYBE W (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or ' the rate and amount of surface water runoff? =� YES MAYBE A• (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? YET MAYBE NC— (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water. body? MAYBE NO (e) Discharge into surface 'waters , or in any alteration surface water quality,, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? YES MAYBE WC— (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? YET— MAYBE NO (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? • YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? ES MAYBE AO • (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? y MAYBE AN Explanation: (4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? y'E's- MAYBE AW (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? 4- Y€B NMI- AD— (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? . YES �MAYBE A (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? TET_ E fiT Explanation: -4- (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of . any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? `YES WET NO (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? YES MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? YET— MAYBE NO (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? • YES MAYBE Explanation: (8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? YES MAYYBE NO Explanation: (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? G/ YES MAYBE NO (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? G" YES M-7TTE NO Explanation: (10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? , YES MAYBE t Explanation: (11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Y MAYBE WU— Explanation: • -5- (12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? r/ YES MAYBE NO -Explanation: (13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: • (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? YES MAYBE NO (b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking? YES MAYBE NO (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (� V- MAYBE NU— (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? YET- MAYBE NO (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? fj YES- MAYBE NO (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? YES MAYBE NB Explanation: (14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : (a) Fire protection? t/ • YES MAYBE WU— (b) ' Police protection? YES MAYBE NO (c) Schools? YES MAYBE NO (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? fi YES MAYBE NO - (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? !i YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? cd/ YES RP-Er NO Explanation: (15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? • YES MAYBE NO (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? YET- MAYBE t0 Explanation: (16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? -� YES MAYBE NO (b) Communications systems? 1" YES MAYBE NO (c) Water? - d/ • YES MAYBE NO 1 -6- (d) Sewer or septic tanks? !� YES MAYBE NO (e) Storm water drainage? YES RUDY N3 (f) Solid waste and disposal? v ' YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? YES MAYBE Explanation: iJ (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? Z/ YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? YES MAYBE N� Explanation: (20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical L! site, structure, object or building? MAYBE NO Explanation: III. SIGNATURE • I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: (/)/G' (signed) • (name printed) 0 0 City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 PARCEL A: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, T H PE23' 41S TH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AND MO P 40LA' Lk DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: C�\�� BEGINNING AT QUARTER CORNER ON SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 2 , p,T WNSHIP ,,23k NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTO THENCE,.�Nel TH 0°08 ,49" EAST ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 20 25531-3T FEET 4i THE • TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, WHICH IS THE SOUTHEAST CORNER 4 THE TR / • EREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 0°08' 49" EAST 317.79 P 41GTR E WESTERLY PARALLEL TO THE EAST AND WEST CENTERLINE OF SECTIO , 625.71 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0°13' 18" WEST 317.81. FEET ; THENCE EASTERLY PARALLEL TO • THE EAST AND WEST CENTERLINE OF SECTION 20, 626. 12 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL B: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:' BEGINNING AT THE SOUTH QUARTER SECTION CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20 AND RUNNING THENCE NORTH 0°08 ' 49" EAST 635. 58 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, WHICH IS THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE TRACT HEREBY CONVEYED; RUNNING THENCE NORTH 0008149u EAST 317.79 FEET ; THENCE WESTERLY PARALLEL . TO THE EAST :AND WEST CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION, 626. 12 FEET ; THENCE SOUTH 0°13' 19" WEST 317. 81 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY PARALLEL TO THE EAST AND WEST CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION, , 626.53 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THEREFROM THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION WHICH IS NORTH 635. 58 FEET ;AS MEASURED ALONG SAID LINE FROM THE QUARTER CORNER ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 20 ; THENCE WESTERLY, PARALLEL TO THE EAST AND WEST CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION, 280 FEET TO THE TRUE ' POINT OF BEGINNING, OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUING WESTERLY, ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, 346.53 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0013118" EAST 94 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. .a}.. .'ra; I'• .l; �- } it I "'1 ' 5'F \t I _ • (REALITV' ,� : Nj;`.. ,; :: ONCE �(' I o, ,, 12615' Benton:Ave. S®. Seattle, Washington,'9 178 77?- ��IZ ;,,• 2:;• . ` . EARNEST MONEY RECEIPT AND AGREEMENT 1 q J__4- 1,;°`, ', r IMPERIAL-WEST MORTGAGE ( ESc.ROV �' ). ------ ./, " :, AVE. EA3t-TL'E, WASHING'T'ON '98176 '• (206) 772 O -IA�V? • , 12540 RENTON AV SO., ` 9a _6 _��1_ Eli__ /f �s RECF V' on9 �\ r I�; _ -�/6 ,�Ldir 2�/ _ DnTC } '�v ' �' � ` � �, s ,f�,q�,f j , , 40 `i: �° tHERL-INA TER CALLE PURCNASER10) - f J 1 rf; ,:- .d •I p y / f'�' A OCT) {y ate.,-a_... '+...'I ^Y, a'^ - ,91'(.A..y.. �`,/TJr' r�9 9�)�Jl ,[t! �� �r ��� .;f _ DOLLARS (S�pV t��. � _ d 5� -i{';jt�!" ) i_ J • {; l''"ih the form beck for/ .�( " .. /i " ? ," , Note for $ ___— -_ 'Due ��._ 9���1�- _„�'. .� 9 i�J1 -+',paid'to agent as'cart st mo1 . fn.ptTft payment a61'the purcfta se price'of the following-described real estate in :.___.19.+:,,4-1ry---�,r-.-- -- County, Washington: (purchaser and seller'authorize agent to Insert or attachlegal'dF•acript' n over all tgnnt es) Any provist ry, w,riltaan on the reverse tstde hereaf'shun- • I {sue r. � .� -{7. b�(..1 i 7 IL:9, f �` yp be'‘AlnnSdered as lncludrfi herein, commonly kno•wn as.: ',, l j,, �� " �`-I"``-"""u d.V Cj !�P 3 •1• .5 : 1 1 ' O. • �....P(sJ ( Ld c ,L r `7 �I'L _ Q e ', 4_ it .. e,% '•0,... -'!r-�d . `''' .toLtb,cl!!/1SiOf\ .:oP i - t-•, , 61.S r'n os.(.,( a ' ricj1..�_e . i-")Q �.4' ' r1 , c `. �' p c0v; ,; 'off''suL4 v( 1or) °�a ar.., 6,-. rr-io�'c or '1;1. b •. , ,I •°. .:),••i''•5,-+ '. ,� � - '�(� .i' i rd. 'r `--1• ( .: n_", any/r , ' Total purchase/� price,Is a .--, �-- - Lf,AR5' ,2. (g '4.S-)•C 9, <) 'a),.Payable as follows: ,r��ll�J,� '�r 4.,'JI`r,; ,,- (Pa 4O• Oro ?%S2...- ,.- :' f I. �" ..X=t) - -€`"•ca h, includingearnest,money recel ted herein, as the down ay ment..Purchaser and's Iier �. entree:to eaTcut �a real estate contract;for the balance duel:seller., payable in'monthly,paymen•tsynfi,$•'n-...: -,,' i,,-,__ r.�„�:r:;C:1 `a uichaser's optio•n. Said'payments to include interest :at the rate of. . ? , '/e per'annurri,' r• iiliuted_prl ,�tl, the diminishing principal balance,. 43�,�� ,� A� • C ud =,1,o\/e•Y. a,r k 1 r 1- .::`rv-. 5hC I' ll Gu(- ci.n -1 ' 'am GI I ec 1 ' � r� ,� ., ' {- -�� , ` (Q i'e . CAI' { .. t.J , ,`i� •40 J,I: if �: ;:''1 I)(`c'')V( / • . ,, .... -1';' • 1(--L9 ` el " -r�A . e-r� ' r ,ppc'' ' i• P4_A.,�' Tie f'.r' - --( pro o kfl.(,,~f( .) ., -''I?(ci. f.f1SC,Tarll(-.-- �'`. "}vQX . ti• .vcJdelo 0 vii'tT '•.•. E • 's • ''1' •Owner shall make available to •purchaser, at office of Ittipei'ial-Westhlartgage"&EscrmyCe., after uceeptpnce}of thin'offer, a policy, of title ln7urunp'on title ',company's report evideneing,condition of title-' • ,• " i . ' . ";'2 '',If title is not insurable and cannot be'made 'insurable'within ninety days; [ram date of title report, earnest money phnll be'refunded•anrl all rights of,our .,chaser terminated,,except that purchaser may Waive'defcçt and elect'to purchase. Out if title is,Insurable,by a Title•lnsurauce;t;umpany and purchnser neglects. /or refused to complete purchase;all the parties hereto, seller, purchaaer and agent,hereby agree that the earnest money shall be forfeited uptenn aeller demands completion,of s,dic, The agent shall not'bo respond able for do 11very of title. ,' I f• , ;` • "3. If financing is required,the purchaser and seller,hereby authorize agent'herein to select the lending inotituti on and to•orrenge the finnnchig,'nf•th is sale and; -°,;to,advance po much of the earnest money as may be necessary for loan costs„ Purchaser agrees to make application Immediately for such financing,spin requese '.-,of agent,sign necessary papers and„deposit,before closing,said advances and all closing coats attributable to purchaser. A veteran purchaser,agrees,to complete, "•this purchase if the,nale price;Ira'reduced.by the caller to conform with the Certificate of Reosonable Value issued by the Veterans,' Administration..Seller and ' 'agent,agrec. to refund earnest money'(less credit report fee:and appralpel'fee,"if any) In event financing,contemplated by the,veterodpurghnper in not pbtalnnble,,, • If purchaser is obtaining a V.A. guaranteed• loan on new`constructlon,seller,agrees not to'violate'paragraph.3 of C,.A;'Technlcisl Bulletin;4'A-138. If the par,. chaser is obtaining an FHA insured loon It le,expressly agreed that, notwithstanding any other provisions of thin contract, the purchaser rihull not be,obligated'' '•.to complete, the purchase',of the property described herein or to incur any,ponalty by forfeiture of earnest money dopoaite or otherwise ttsiltasn ,theAollcr has de-.. •.( }livered to.• the purchaser a written s Cement-issues( by the'Federnl'housing Commissioner setting forth the appraised yalue of the property,tor mortgage.insurance ';,,;'purposes of not less than S_ ' ( which'statement the'seller hereby agrees to deliver to.the purchaser,promptly after such appraised vgluo"state-'•' ,ntent is made avallnblo to.the spiler. The purchaser shall, however; have tiie.privilege mid option of proceeding with the consummation of,this',c-ontrurt without-. regard to;thc amount of the appraised valuation made by the'Federal hou;ting Commissioner. _ '4'• 'y teraO urchi n--I e'xbredsl:,agreca.l t, tiotwi us,ling any'Othc ,rovl,lions• f thin,contract, the .larcha`iacr shall neat inr-tan any penalty by.In;": 'i i,•.;chase of,e n t.tn fed •or t rwise rlr a oh 'rate to,co fete t e ;arches• the repri�yjdescri sere. ,.df-t14. cOlitrru;t purgriasebrice a11>co^ t,eicc;,y:1'5 •the reasatabl vo cent the pr pert sea is by t c V grans' Ad fnistrat' n.• a riThe•s r sh�i , Ito evy , have 1te�prTtr Erie t: ii,i opl'on of pro edlrg",kitti :;•,the c mina to of tl' caner cthout and to.th•,,mount.of.the rens bic yalue establi- : by the, trterans A nistnAit•n.,. •'• - ' 5 ' The'property 16 to be conveyed'by,c'ontract for war•ranty'deed•or purchaser's anslgnMent of contract, or warranty duel, if Payment,in full Is made- Sold coria ' voyance shall.be free and clear,of all encumbrances.In the'event there is an existing mortgage qr contract on above mentioned property.which will not be, paid in.'' •'full'nt closing;'or assumed'by purchasers at closing,maid mortgage or contract shall continue to be paid by seller according;to Its terms.and conditions.'if, under' = the 'terms of this agreement, the,property Is to be conveyed by Contract for Warranty Deed,the seller end purchaser herein agree to elan a'Real Estate Contract- ' agree-for the'balance.'of the purchaue,price,over and above the'down payment, on Real Estate Contract Form No. A-1964 currently dintributed,by Title Insurance Com-', 1,''nanfes,the terms ofony being satlsfactory'to'the parties hereto,a}nd the terms thereof being herein Incorporated byreference.l• - • �... , , :t , ' •a 6' ' rights,-re'served •iri fesferal1'patents or state deeds,building,or use restrictions general, to the'dlstrict building,or•zoriinft ret"ulat leant and pro felons rand existing apaemgnts shall nqt be deemdd ericumbrancon. Cneumbrnncen,to b,e Qlscharged by owngr, may bo paid sift of the purchase money at•dete of closing. • . 7' Taxcs'for the'current year,rents,.interest', mortgage reserves,tenter.and other utilities constituting'llenn, slioll'bar prorated'nre of date'of closing, Purchaser', '.,', Dhoti pay for remaining oil in fuel tank,the amount to be determi ed try,tph^e supplier. ,- . , ' • , + :.. - . , • .. ' g' Purchaser,shall be entitled to,po)se:)s clef:" �ri C 0,)1af ') . If.posseaeioals granted'prior,.a r.losing;-n•rental •''shall be charged in the amount of S.� per day from date of pos ecsion to dato',of closing. • ' , - .t , 9 Purchaser off rn tof t1 ILltrchas lLfropert• y'•on the terms noted in its present'conditian onil this agreement in issued subject to the•apiirt.vul of the,sellrer life reef. ,";within.__. . u, an a se, rcimeor agrees riot to"withdraw,'this offer duringmaid traded, or until earlier rejection th,frcof,hy'aeller.'1 yrcha u er'ngreed that, "i writtennotl oof acceptance given to agent by seller shall bo,notico'to purchaser. If seller does not accept thin agreement within the limo st}eelfiecl,'the agent; '.; -will refund the earnest money'upon'demand. ' . ' •'•t , . - - ,,.,, . ,'-''•' .. 10 The sale' nhullbe cloned In the office'of Irl'rperial-WestMortgage&Pscro.#Co„within._;6 • :duya after title in ttrancapo,licy or title insurance "company's report'is furnished by owner'or completion•of financing'if called toe herein,whichever is later.The purchaser and the teller.rte rah;:agree to deposit in'. ;•,.▪''',.escrow all instruments and monies negessttry to,complete the purchase, and pay the cost of escror.,. Seller'and agent agree 'to, refund,erirnest eynney'(ltip;•crcdi• ,c •f'report fee and appraisal fee, if any) in event financing is•not obtainable. ,.I, • • ' .} _ '•'' ' .,i ' ' '' 11' Linoleum, window.screens;;screen doors,-plumbing and lighting fixturro,('except floor.and.standing tathpa)shade it,''Venal,l'an.bl,inds,'caatain,rods,.all attache' .., ed m bathroo fixtures, trees,plants,'and shrubbery In the yard, water-heating'apparatus and fixtures,'awning, vontllnting ,cooling and heating'systefna (except', •Istoven) that'ore now on the pre'mis'es shall be'Included in the sale. except leased fixtures and heating equipment,',if any, Attached television-antennas,:If arty,' •,now on the promises shall remain intact and included in this sale, ',' . . • .'12 There,are'no verbal,or other agreements which modify or affect this agreement.'Time is•of the essence of this agreement.' ,1 p r J • - • I - �du'1 ,�y r ,. Purchaser i�'� 6 91i i•\ t " Purchaser's •(wife}';( ate. n'! 'V 7:�r"'` mac( ,,^ _ A citizen or'rm'. who'ba, in good faith declared h lztention tto become a cit1i..�n pf hero.,United ttaates, Purchasers.herein e rrant,thev are of legal axe. - -• ,I• ^LI '1 2-f V A,• ,Pict;ct• �..' •. c..��t df.! 115 ti&i it!',( 7TT ':-41 r1) YY -7 '- l•a, Purchaser's Address and Phone' �` * 7� L • 'On this date, ; •, I hereby'approv'e It nd accept the oate set font tt e above ogree•reent and agree'tocor,ry nut.,u11 trai terms' thereof•ori t e pert'g{'ihe seller,and the undetaigned••further agrees to pay a,commission of• � Gj'�7 �� `�: .�'%_;�°"f" - • --Dollars" (5 •.�� ` ,'' 'C,," ' `', ' ( '- •)'to.,the•ad aye'agent for services, In,the event'earnest money is forfeited;it,shall he;upporti ane.d.to nailer' ,,and agent equally, pt,. ,, n amount to„ag does•not,ezgeed the agreed eommission. I ttuther'n,`�•}/snowled3e.i•gcelip,t of true co�! of lisle egrcer»ent signr:d •by,both,part' I•'t '[',' I' I;, ;,'' .r,//.'-' !"� "_`:r:..:j ,,�y '" • ' . �' • • • Settle'r's Wife --.4--_ ��ie •-r_c_r•, •'"f.l. .. ,'Seller - :-tom. d grus Sc,llcr'a oddresn and Phone, ✓ � e °"•d`^�u i ^' '"`- ' 4 , }, Y.ti ` , m-- a'� ' _ fi•r y' • • '1;1 •� .I .!• ,+' ., -,1 • ' '� 19 , '+1.-.. n true cnpy'of the fore-. 1 - , r'"•' f (J pal greCme n' elRrled iy, to 4s qr4 1a It rteby recrilpiedfoF' '•t�•'t„ - Aare❑4' i• •�; ^v: ,!. Pdrehaser' 'i ' f a I', t -ti'i•' '•' r i • ,7 1�.,7,• '1.' +1 ':�i..l+: jt;" `J-• '1. 'i 'I 'r^ 't t 'jr NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON AUGUST 29 , 19 78 , AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: 1 . CASCADIA PROPERTIES CORP , File R-208-78; APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM R-1 TO L-1 ; property located on Lake Avenue South between ,South Victoria Street and South Second Street. 2 . HAROLD M. SYRSTADCFileR-21 APPLICATION , FOR REZONE FROM GS-1� -7 property located on north side of Puget Drive S .E . approximately 1200 feet east of Grant Avenue South and adjacent to the Rolling Hills Subdivision . 3. GARY VOLCHOK, File R-212-78; APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G TO M-P; property located on the East Valley Highway between S .W . 21st and S .W . 23rd, east and north of the Olympic Pipeline facility . Legal descriptions on file in the Renton Planning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON. AUGUST 29 , 1978 AT 9.00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. GORDON Y. ERICKSEN PUBLISHED August 18, 1978 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR • CERTIFICATION I, STEVE MUNSON HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: . Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, on thel6thday of August I / 19 78 . SIGNED if' - e7,,r7 2 vb.. 1 V z THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 wil o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0 Q` 235-2550 4r'D SEP&E���August 16 , 1978 Harold M . Syrstad Star Route Box 24A Olga , Washington 98279 RE : NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING _ E FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM GS- 1 TO SR- 1 , file no . -211- property located on north side of Puget Drive S . E . approximately 1200 feet east of Grant Avenue South and adjacent to the Rolling Hills subdivision . Dear Mr. Syrstad : The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on August 4 , 1978 A public hearing, before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for August 29 , 1978 at 9 : 00 a .m . . Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present . All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing . If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department , 235-2550 . Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen P1 anni nig Director �I r, `r .B y �,..: . Midhael L . Smi;'th , Senior Planner PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING AUGUST 29, 1978 APPLICANT: Harold M. Syrstad FILE NUMBER: R-211-78, REZONE FROM GS-1 TO SR-1 A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests approval of a rezone to SR-1 to allow future sub- division of the subject site. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Harold M. Syrstad 2. Applicant: Harold M. Syrstad 3. Location: North side of Puget Drive S.E. approxi- mately 350 feet east of Grant Avenue South and adjacent to the Rolling Hills sub- division. 4. Legal Description: A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5. Size of Property: ±1 acre 6. Access: Via Puget Drive'S.E. 7. Existing Zoning: GS-1, Single Family Residence District 8. Existing Zoning in the Area: GS-1, General Classification District; SR-1, Suburban Residence District; R-2, Residence District; R-3, Residence District. 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Low Density Multiple Family Residential 10. Notification: The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance. C. PURPOSE OF REQUEST: To provide proper zoning for future subdivision and development. D. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The site is the remaining ownership of Mr. Syrstad after sale of adjacent parcels north and west to Condominium Builders, Inc. , and was not included in the subsequent rezone and special permit for that property. E. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1. Topography: There is a general downward slope of from 6 to 8% in a northeasterly-southwesterly direction. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRLLIMINIIRY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: HAROLD M. SYRSTAD, FILE NO. R-211-78 AUGUST 29, 1978 PAGE TWO 2. oils: Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam (AgC). Permeability is mod- erately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil , and very slow in the substratum. Runoff is slow to medium and the erosion hazard is mod- erate. 3. Vegetation: Significant growths of evergreen and deciduous trees exist along the north and east borders of the property. The rest of the site is a mixture of some medium shrubs and considerable scrub grass. 4. Wildlife: Existing vegetation on the site may provide suitable habi- tat for birds and small mammals. 1 5. Water: There is no existing water on the subject site. 6. Land Use: An existing single family residence is located on the westerly portion of the subject site with the remainder of the site undeveloped. The Rolling Hills single family residential subdivision is located directly adjacent to the easterly boundary of the site. An existing townhouse multiple family development is located south of the subject site across Puget Drive. Parkwood South single family subdivision is located southeast of the site. The property west and north of the site is presently undeveloped. However, plans for a condominium development have been approved. F. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: Mixture of multiple family and single family residential . G. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Water and Sewer: Existing 12-inch and 16-inch water mains run east- west along Puget Drive and a 12-inch main is located on Grant Avenue. An 8-inch sanitary sewer is located on Grant Avenue approximately 750 feet to the northwest of the subject site. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the Renton Fire Department per 'code re- g6irements. (See attached Fire Department comments. ) 3. Transit: METRO Transit Route 145 operates along Benson Road South within 4 mile to the west of the subject site. 4. Schools: The subject site is located approximately one mile northeast of Talbot Hill Elementary School and 4 mile north of the Fred Nelsen . J6nior High School , while Renton Senior High School is within two miles to the north. 5. Parks: Phillip Arnold Park is located approximately 2 mile north of the subject site, while Talbot Hill Park is about one mile west and Tiffany Park is within one mile to the east. • H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: I ' 1. Section 4-704, SR-1, Single Family Residence District. 2. Section 4-706, R-1, Single Family Residence District. 3. Section 4-708, R-2, Residential Two Family. 4. Section 4-709A, R-3, Multiple Family Residence District. •I . i PI.ANN I Nl 1)I I'AR I MLNT' PRELIMINARY REPORT k, HEARING EXAMINER - PUBLIC HEARING: HAROLD M. SYRSTAD, FILE NO. R-211-78 AUGUST 29, 1978 PAGE THREE I . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: Comprehensive Plan, 1965, Land Use Report, Objective 6, p. 18. J. IMPACT ON THE NATURAL SYSTEMS: Rezone of the site will not have a direct impact. However, future devel- opment of the site will disturb existing soils, increase storm water runoff and have an effect on traffic and noise levels in the area. However, these can be considered minor through the establishment of proper development controls and ordinance requirements. K. SOCIAL IMPACTS: Minimal L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, RCW 43-21C, a negative declaration of environmental impact has been issued. This declaration is conditional upon the retention of as many existing trees on the site as possible per Renton Planning Department approval . M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: A vicinity map and a site map are attached. N. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1. City of Renton Building Division. 2. City of Renton Engineering Division. 3. City of Renton Traffice Engineering Division. 4. City of Renton Utilities Division. 5. City of Renton Fire Department. Copies of interdepartmental comments are attached. 0. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. The proposed rezone (single family residential ) is a lesser intensive land use than that indicated on the comprehensive plan land use map element (low density multiple family residential ). However, it can be considered compatible with the comprehensive plan and existing single family residential uses and zoning in the area. Sufficient buffering was included in the approval of the proposed condominium project west and north of the site to provide compatibility between that use and the proposed rezone. However, more suitable ultimate use of the subject site may be R-2. 2. The applicant proposes to subdivide the subject site into three par- cels. This will require approval of a short plat by the Hearing Examiner. 3. Suitable utilities are available near the subject site. (See attached Utility Division comments. ) 4. Significant trees exist on the subject site. These should be preserved ., and retained as a mitigating measure of environmental impact. PIJ\NN I NG DI.I'AI;TMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT Tv NEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: HAROLD M. SYRSTAD, FILE NO. R-211-78 PAGE FOUR P. PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of rezone to SR-1 based on the above analysis subject to preservation of as many trees as possible per no. 4 above. No clear- ing of the site shall be permitted without prior approval of the Planning Department. . ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : , O Finance Department . Fire Department" . Library Department OPark Department Police Department Public Works Department. " Building Div. . ® Engineering Div . 2 Traffic Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or This designee ) 6(Q ri(z "'L5'"‘ DATE : g//e/7S) PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR: REZONE MAJOR PLAT SITE APPROVAL SHORT PLAT SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT OR EXEMPTION AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE 8/2/77e REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : C_10C, Comments : 1 I j ;! (2,...--;.,......- „.. e"--- "..a---.?,-,-.--.--,4-rt.__ Z—(V-7/ Signature of;IDDi ctor or Authorized Representative Date I . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : 1 Department : 7 -' . I 7 'fl Pry v i'E= CIA'sAfio, 'e V e` Comments : ��,,� / 1 �..„--- k p.c . - --,"�-,-� c--11 1 i 1 R 3 G. L c=-I. r--1-t.' �7' -�� I I ti nr �_ �C d, -L_ f —/ 5 7F Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 1 I REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : VilfPfttilE12 Disivroore— Comments : /' VC-61-• Y ,,, e- ,7e-7)/-/.17 7/:' (55:— /7- Signature o Direct r or Autholyptd Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : U-41L -1/ PA,P4 I a e PIO I-574 Ar:44 Comments : v: CopeEA5 reP2 /2„." 4..1A 1IP I ki ?Li 4 irr; LuA711,, 4_ T- z Signature ofDirector or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : „IsrtIll -a_r3 p 0 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date I ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO : ® Finance Department IIFire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department 0 Publi.c Works Department Building Div. Engineering Div. ® Traffic Engineering Div. ® Utilities Engineering Div. FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee) nn <- e MUSo1- SUBJECT: Review of ECF- 376 7P ; Application No . : R" difl-v Action Name : Rezones fC�1_,p5f 614 / L-,t" -5-yrsILO '•.0 s--1 "to S -I Please review the attached. Review requested by (date) : 9f07//7e Note : Responses to be written in ink. I _ . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEP TMENTS : Department : CD C" . tZAf'i"/Aove- /S /°4 O 4 Comments : ` /rr;�� �cr•t%/ C el/Cf-7 i Signature of Di or or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : tires • t✓ 4,,t6)~ /s mo,0,4 o'e- Comments : ,- )-,„4._„:„.... c-44 , a ,ge-,_,,- ., 1- -/5 7 fr Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date - I I • REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : /".:2, V6.1=//,/,....f..--7--:--;1z_=•-/1-_-1/,./C/6-_-; _ .__97°//Q6 fr,0/5/9-/e",-0A9 '6-7 Comments : zove-.7 o/y s-, 0 s ; kv-ert,v e frt a(\cc-4Q 7 Signatmre of Director or e1. thorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : •t_73/7P,eXo ,e1/5/55,'"ie o Comments : • Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 7-ie..4-Fr lc EN /A/47- 4) 6 Comments : /411.° (1C-••• / • -7:e; -,.• .5 ;///: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : • Department : Comments : • Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date •,. , . , . . . v ._ .,, ,,.. r ,,,,, ,:---- „ . ._, ,_„ 4,, . ,y _ ..,2„ i., c) _ .- . . , — ,,,,,,,,,c,- - y .., 1 ,, _ .„‘ . . , . t,„.„...„ , .- . ,,, . ... ..„.. .... „...,.., -, .. . .__ . ..__, ._ • . ,, ., • . . „ 9 • , • • tC51N9,I0I1112'1311 ip161/!111:1912 ?Il Tracl t • �` ,, �y�y�yy `.'1 6_`,?' I, i'I," ":223r�7,�5�1(�''�r,, Tr.,••; (�, 1. � v-)' . ,` y, I. e 1.1't . I 6 • , I. °I •20 '' I�I 5` \`�-'tl' •• o'��•' \" •3. `• \ I I , I. • 9 12 IT • 2Ni 10 9 Nz 7 e . �, •1~.•. n\ 4 ] „, 'IE•fro' 21., I 2 ) 1 7 f_3 . � ' •� '• '.I I 2 29 • s'�'`'' ''''• ,4 • 4 • *. -- p i r44c,` !�J r -E� ,Ord� e , 3.,' ''C f'• \C • •P''. on 2 . . -_,.,,,,,,,-.., 5....y, .. a f_ .p o'i::.' .,„4_4 :.; --,, I 5E 15 7•'-'.ST "•'' \.- —— i � , 11 z se \'�J/ Q ° 4 ~ it p') oa� B ,�i '�. �toty�©O> • • . _ -- :7.'TI SX weir 5- : s R \Ls a SRN.I � Z. 21„.T ;� 5ee a a, I I .t �� . : a Ti_ s. at � - orT\-• SubJec a 5 I A SE V I ' E. W • Iz `• •i ` A \ s, ••=7 t a- 2 I ,t• , 0 • • 10II i II GM I • ,_ r� I� r�;J .� F3 JVJ 5 • \I• y I [�)�.', t ,) •'.a• --.a- E Ic, b ;��IE �_2 TLI'•!T . _ - �7 �__1-_�_ IJ i• [.u ) to -"i.b ____ _ _— 27TE sT _ I Iz I I• r _. _ _ Oil. t�•)I �t: 1 r. A ysi� e ]C. 19.4W��5, I 12 \ `^ ly • �-vwv..y1 4 _ t 1 `\� I Z jfl Iums1 -`l�l{III • •-- _-- - > 13 I I` _ b 1i •r` t�l�l.l rr I Itl�r . h'i 14 • 9 w3�][Y�a ♦7HR : .__` hJ - - -, _ • • qrtl1 6 I 5 ItzIiJ I 'A • ( i(1 I�I ` i•.•- 4 iE r..Vb•I•,I40 r„,!').'1y y • REZONE . • HAROLD M. SYRSTAD, REZONE FROM GS-1 TO SR-1, FILE NO. R-211-78; - • property located on north side of Puget Drive S.E. approximately 350 feet east of Grant Avenue South and adjacent to the Rolling Hills subdivision. APPL I CANT Harold M. Syrstad TOTAL AREA ±1 acre PR I NC I PAL ACCESS Grant Avenue South and Puget Drive S.E. EXIS-1ING ZONING GS-1 (Residential Single Family) . • • EXISTING USE Undeveloped . PROPOSED USE SR-1, Residential. Single Family COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Low Density Multiple Family • COMMENTS ' s /(1). . ❑ a /, Q o / i/ ) . It./.\q a ❑ O i .g r....„ 6,...- -... - • o cr 0 C O ) k, ... _ r---—.....—— ...0 . \ El r , La I14S G�/ , El Ill Ncc \ 0 !6 \ c ---- -___ :, \ 0 : .,1 t + 0 \ S \ Arv\s _ 0 4 . P \ l i ( JI R lVE f I ! �, \ . r i l NI \ I I \ 1 . 1 \ ---.. ...,,,,,,,\ \ - - — _ —.� . a , , , I: I \ \_ , , , , 1 \\ \ jI I I 1 \ \ I ► Ii I__ _ -- - - f , , _ ._.- — _._ . - . _. - — r..._.•-- ,--• Y t SCALE:- +"=200' e f Suejr0 T SI1E gigi I MARo►J SYRSTAD . REZONE R-."r-78 1 PROPOSED/FINAL DELLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/NUN-SIGNIFICANCE • Application No . R-211-78 ❑ PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . 373-78 .0 FINAL Declaration . Description of proposal Applicant requests rezone from GS-1 , Single Fajnily Residence District (minimum, lot size 35 ,000 sq . ft. ) , . to SR- 1 , Single Family Residence District (min . lot size 7 , 500 sq . ft. ) . Proponent _ Harold M. Syrstad North side of. Puget Drive S . E . , approximately 350 feet Location of Proposal east of Grant Ave . S. and adjacent to the Rolling •Hills subdivision . Lead Agency Renton Planning Department This proposal has been determined to 0 have XD not have a significantiadverse impact upon the environment . An EIS ❑ is is not 'required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 )'(c ) . •This decision was ma e after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmentalAsngnificance : __ The declaration of non-significance is for the rezone request only and does not apply to any' specific development plan . The proposed request is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan . • Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue •a (proposed/final ) • declaration of non-significance : At the time of development the applicant will be required to comply with the requirements of the SR-1 zone. . Responsible Official Gordon Y . Ericksen Title Planni, g Dir,•ctor ► ate August 22 , 1978_ Signature 2401, L` _ _` Or Of . City of Renton Planning Department : 5-76 . -. • r 4