The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAdministrative Variance Report and Decision_Reyes Addition_15-000232DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Project Location Map Reyes Variance Report ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE REPORT & DECISION A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST REPORT DATE: August 13, 2015 Project Name: Reyes Addition Variance Owner/Applicant: Osmand Reyes Armengol, 220 Garden Avenue N, Renton, WA 98057 Contact: Joe Luckey, Arete Design, 12041 22nd Avenue NE, Seattle, WA 98125 File Number: LUA15-000232 VAR Project Manager: Jill Ding, Senior Planner Project Summary: The applicant is requesting approval of an Administrative Variance from the provisions of the Renton Municipal Code (RMC) regulating rear yard setbacks for a single family addition to an existing structure in the Residential - 8 dwelling unit per acre (R-8) zone (RMC 4-2-110A). The existing 1,572 square foot home is proposed to be increased to 3,147 square feet. The applicant is proposing a 5-foot side yard setback at the south property line and a second story building addition over the existing single-family footprint within the 20-foot rear yard setback. The lot is 4,120 square feet in area. The variance would be to allow a second story enlargement to the west half of the existing structure to within 15 feet of the rear yard setback where a 20-foot rear yard setback is required. Vehicular access to the property is via the alley between Garden Ave N and Meadow Ave N. No trees will be removed as part of the addition. Project Location: 220 Garden Avenue N Site Area: 4,120 Square Feet (0.09 acres) CityofRentonDepartmentofCommunity&EconomicDevelopmentAdministrativeVarianceReport&DecisionREYESADDITIONVARIANCELUA15-000232,VARReportofAugust13,2015Page2of6NB.PROJECTDESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND:Atthetimeofprojectapplication,thesubjectR-8zonedpropertywassubjecttotheinterimzoningstandardsadoptedunderOrdinance5724.Theinterimstandardsrequireda15-footcombinedsideyardsetbackwithaminimumsideyardof5feetanda25-footrearyardsetback.Ordinance5724wasrepealedunderOrdinance5759(effectiveJuly1,2015).TheR-8setbacksunderOrdinance5759requirea5-footsideyardsetbackanda20-footrearyardsetback.Theproposedadditionwouldmaintaina5-footsideyardsetbackfromthesouthpropertylineanda15-footrearsetbackfromtheeastpropertyline.Atthetimeofapplication,theprojectsitewassubjecttotheinterimstandardsoutlinedunderOrdinance5724andavariancetothesideandrearyardsetbackswasrequested.UnderthecurrentR-$setbackrequirementsadoptedunderOrdinance5759,theproposedadditionwouldcomplywiththerequired5-footsideyard,howeveravariancewouldstillbeneededfromthe20-footrearyardsetback.Theexistingsinglefamilyresidenceiscurrentlysetback1.8feetfromtherear(east)propertylineand2.5feetfromthesouth(side)propertyline.Theproposedadditionwouldbeconstructedwestoftheexistingresidenceandwouldmaintaina5-footsetbackfromthesouth(side)propertyline,a43.3-footsetbackfromthewest(front)propertyline,a13.25-footsetbackfromthenorth(side)propertyline,anda15-footsetbackfromtheeast(rear)propertyline.Theportionoftheadditionwithintherearsetbackisonthesecondstorywheretheroofwouldconnecttotheridgelineoftheexistingsinglefamilyresidence.C.EXHIBITS:Thefollowingexhibitswereenteredintotherecord:Exhibit1:SitePlanExhibit2:PropertySurveyExhibit3:SouthBuildingElevationExhibit4:VarianceJustificationExhibit5:NeighborhoodDetailMapD.FINDINGS:Havingreviewedthewrittenrecordinthematter,theCitynowmakesandentersthefollowing:1.Request:Theapplicantisrequestingavariancefromthe20-footR-8rearyardsetbackrequirement(RMC4-2-11OA)toaminimumsetbackof15feet.2.AdministrativeVariance:Theapplicant’ssubmittalmaterialscomplywiththerequirementsnecessarytoprocesstheadministrativevariance.Theapplicant’sneighborhoodvicinitymap,siteplanandotherprojectdrawingsareprovidedasExhibits1-5.3.ExistingZoningandLandUses:ThezoningoftheprojectsiteandallpropertieswithintheprojectvicinityisResidential—8(R-8).Thesurroundingpropertiestothenorth,south,westandeastaredevelopedwithsinglefamilyresidences.ReyesVarianceReport CityofRentonDepartmentofCommunity&EconomicDevelopmentAdministrotiveVorionceReport&DecisionREYESADDITIONVARIANCELUA15-000232,VARReportofAugust13,2015Page3of6E.CONSISTENCYWITHVARIANCECRITERIA:Section4-9-250B.5.alists4criteriathatthePlanningDirectorisaskedtoconsider,alongwithallotherrelevantinformation,inmakingadecisiononanAdministrativeVarianceapplication.Theseincludethefollowing:ThePlanningDirectorshallhaveauthoritytograntanAdministrativeVarianceuponmakingadetermination,inwriting,thattheconditionsspecifiedbelowhavebeenfoundtoexist:1.Theapplicantsufferspracticaldifficultiesandunnecessaryhardshipandthevarianceisnecessarybecauseofspecialcircumstancesapplicabletosubjectproperty,includingsize,shape,topography,andlocationorsurroundingsofthesubjectproperty,andthestrictapplicationoftheZoningCodeisfoundtodeprivesubjectpropertyownerofrightsandprivilegesenjoyedbyotherpropertyownersinthevicinityandunderidenticalzoneclassification:TheapplicantcontendsthatspecialcircumstancesexistonthesubjectpropertyandthestrictapplicationoftheZoningCodewoulddeprivethepropertyowneroftherightandprivilegeofconstructingasecondstoryadditiontotheirexistingresidence.Theexistingsinglefamilyresidencewasconstructedin192$anddoesnotconformtothecurrentsideandrearsetbackrequirementsfromthesouth(side)andeast(rear)propertylines.Theexistingresidenceisaminimumof2.5feetfromthesouth(side)propertylineand1.8feetfromtheeast(rear)propertyline.Theproposedadditionhasbeensitedtothewestoftheresidencewithinthefrontyardandhasbeenoff-setfromtheexistingresidencetothenorthslightly,toprovideaminimum5-footsideyardsetbackfromthesouthpropertyline.Theonlyportionoftheadditionwithinthetearyardsetbackiswherethesecondstoryadditionconnectstotheridgelineoftheexistingresidence.Theadditionwouldextend5feetintothe20-foottearsetback.Staffhasreviewedtherequestedvarianceandconcursthatthelocationoftheexistingresidencewithintherequiredyardareasisaspecialcircumstanceandthatthestrictapplicationofthe20-footrearyardsetbackwoulddeprivethepropertyownerofthesecondstoryadditionrequested.2.Thatthegrantingofthevariancewillnotbemateriallydetrimentaltothepublicwelfareorinjurioustothepropertyorimprovementsinthevicinityandzoneinwhichsubjectpropertyissituated:Theapplicantcontendsthatthegrantingofthevariancewouldnotbedetrimentaltothepublicwelfareorinjurioustosurroundingpropertiesbecauseportionoftheadditionthatwouldextendintotherearyardsetbackislocatedonthesecondstoryovertheexistingbuildingfootprintandthatnoportionoftheexpansionatthegroundlevelwouldextendintorequiredsetbacks.Staffconcursthatthemajorityoftheadditionwouldcomplywiththerequiredsetbacks.Theportionoftheadditionthatwouldextendintothetearyardsetbackiswherethesecondstoryoftheadditionwouldconnecttotheridgelineoftheexistingresidence,asmalltriangularintrusionwithlimitedvisualimpact.Itisnotanticipatedthatthegrantingofthe5-footvariancewouldbedetrimentaltothepublicwelfareorinjurioustopropertyorimprovementsinthesurroundingvicinity.3.Thatapprovalshallnotconstituteagrantofspecialprivilegeinconsistentwiththelimitationuponusesofotherpropertiesinthevicinityandzoneinwhichthesubjectpropertyissituated:ReyesVorionceReport CityofRentonDepartmentofCommunity&EconomicDevelopmentAdministrativeVarianceReport&DecisionREYESADDITIONVARIANCELUA15-000232,VARReportofAugust13,2015Page4of6Theapplicantcontendsthattherequestedvariancewouldnotconstituteagrandofspecialprivilegeastheportionoftheproposedadditionwithintherearsetbackisasmalltriangularportionoftheadditionontheupperlevelovertheexistingbuildingfootprint.Staffconcursthattheapprovaloftherequestedvariancewouldallowtheapplicanttoaddatwo-storyadditiontoanexistingsinglefamilyresidence.TheexistingsinglefamilyresidenceislocatedalmostentirelywithintherequiredrearyardsetbackfortheR-$zone.Theadditionwouldextendapproximately5feetintotherequiredrearyardsetbackwheretheadditionconnectstotheridgelineoftheexistingresidence.Thegrantingoftherequestedvariancewouldnotconstituteagrantofspecialprivilegeinconsistentwithotherresidencesinthesurroundingneighborhoodasmanyresidencesarecurrently2storiesinheight.Furthermore,thesmalltriangularportionoftheadditionthatwouldextendintothesetbackisnecessaryinorderforanadditiontobeaddedtotheexistingstructurewhichcurrentlyextendsintothesetbackmuchfurtherthan5feet.Whentheadditionisevaluatedfromaconstructabilitystandpoint,theadditionshouldconnecttotheexistinghomeattheridgelineoftheroof.Ifthe20footsetbackwasmaintainedtheadditionwouldappearmorelikeaduplexfromtheexteriorinsteadofasinglefamilyresidence.However,uponreviewofthesubmittedfloorplans,itappearsthenewadditionwouldincludeasecondkitchenandcouldeasilyresultintheresidencebeingconvertedintoaduplex.DuplexesorattacheddwellingsarenotpermittedintheR-8zone.Staffrecommendsthattheproposedentrywaysbetweentheexistingresidenceandtheproposedadditionremainopentoensuretheresidenceisnotconvertedintoaduplex.4.Thattheapprovalisaminimumvariancethatwillaccomplishthedesiredpurpose:Theapplicantcontendsthatapprovalofavariancetopermitaportionoftheproposedsecondstoryadditiontoprotrudeapproximately5feetintotherearsetbackistheminimumvariancenecessarythatwillaccomplishthedesiredpurposeofaddinga2-storyadditiontothefrontoftheexistingresidence.Staffconcursthatthedesignoftheaddition,limitsthestructuresintrusionintotherearsetbackandistheminimumvariancenecessarytoaccomplishthedesiredpurposeofaddingasecondstorytotheexistingresidence.Typically,asecondstoryisaddedontopofasinglestoryhome.Inorderforthesubjectadditiontocomplywiththesetbackofthezonethesideyardsetbacksweredesignedtobecompliantwiththe5-footsideyardsetbackzoningstandardseventhoughtheexistingbuildingencroachesintothesideyardsetbackandthesecondstorywassettowardsthefrontofthehouseandnotplacedontopoftheexistingbuildingwhichwouldhaveresultedina1.5ft.rearyardsetback.F.CONCLUSIONS:1.Thesubjectsiteislocatedat220GardenAvenueN.ThesiteiswithintheResidential—8(R-8)Zone.2.Theapplicant’sproposalistoconstructa2-storyadditiontothefrontoftheexistingresidence.Aportionofthesecondstoryadditionwouldextendapproximately5feetintothe20-footrearyardsetback.3.TheanalysisoftheproposedadditionwasevaluatedaccordingtovariancecriteriaandisfoundinthebodyoftheStaffReport.ReyesVarianceReport CityofRentonDepartmentofCommunity&EconomicDevelopmentAdministrativeVarianceReport&DecisionREYESADDITIONVARIANCELUAI5-000232,VARReportofAugust13,2015Page5of64.Duringthecourseofthereview,staffdeterminedthattheproposedadditionmeetsthefour(4)criteriatobeconsideredinmakingadecisiononavariancerequestasspecifiedinRMC4-9-250B5.a.Specialcircumstancesapplytothesubjectsitewhichimposeunduelimitationsontheproperty;thegrantingofthevariancewillnotbemateriallydetrimentaltothepublicwelfareorinjurioustothepropertyorimprovementsinthevicinityandzoneinwhichthesubjectpropertyissituated;thegrantingofthevariancedoesnotconstituteagrantofspecialprivilegeinconsistentwiththelimitationupontheuseofotherpropertiesinthevicinityandzoneinwhichthesubjectpropertyislocated;andtheapprovalofthevariancerequestwouldbetheminimumvariancenecessarytoaccomplishthedesiredpurpose.LG.DECISION:The15ft.rearyardsetbackAdministrativeVarianceforReyesAdditionProject,FileNo.LUA5-000232,isherebyapprovedsubjecttothefollowingcondition:1.Theproposedentrywaysbetweentheexistingresidenceandtheproposedadditionshallremainopentoensurethattheresidenceisnotconvertedintoaduplex.AttacheddwellingsarenotpermittedintheR-$zone.DATEOFDECISIONONLANDUSEACTION:SIGNATURE:‘vJc%JLkttt.r/‘175JenniferHenning,AICP,PlanningDirectorDateDepartmentofCommunity&EconomicDevelopmentTRANSMITTEDthis13thdayofAugust,2015totheApplicant/Owner:OsmanD.ReyesArmengo!220GardenAvenueNRenton,WA98057TRANSMITTEDthis13thdayofAugust,2015totheContact:JoeLuckeyArete’Design1204122ndAvenueNESeattle,WA98125TRANSMITTEDthis13thdayofAugust,2015tothefollowingPattiesofRecord:CherylNygaardStevenEhrlich11635SE58thStreet245MeadowAvenueNBellevue,WA98006Renton,WA98057TRANSMITTEDthis13thdayofAugust,2015tothefollowing:ChipVincent,CEDAdministratorCraigBurnell,BuildingOfficialVanessaDolbee,CurrentPlanningManagerSteveLee,DevelopmentEngineeringManagerReyesVarianceReport CityofRentonDepartmentofCommunity&EconomicDevelopmentAdministrativeVarianceReport&DecisionREYESADDITIONVARIANCELUAI5-000232,VARReportofAugust13,2015Page6of6FireMarshalRentonReporterH.LANDUSEACTIONAPPEALS,REQUESTFORRECONSIDERATION,&EXPIRATIONTheadministrativelandusedecisionwillbecomefinalifitisnotappealedwithin14daysoftheeffectivedateofdecision.APPEAL:ThisadministrativelandusedecisionwillbecomefinalifnotappealedinwritingtotheHearingExamineronorbefore5:00PMonAugust27,2015.Anappealofthedecisionmustbefiledwithinthe14-dayappealperiod(RCW43.21.C.075(3);WAC197-11-680).AppealstotheExamineraregovernedbyCityofRentonMunicipalCodeSection4-8-110.AdditionalinformationregardingtheappealprocessmaybeobtainedfromtheRentonCityClerk’soffice,RentonCityHall—7thFloor,(425)430-6510.Appealsmustbefiledinwriting,togetherwiththerequiredfeetotheHearingExaminer,CityofRenton,1055SouthGradyWay,Renton,WA98057.RECONSIDERATION:Within14daysoftheeffectivedateofdecision,anypartymayrequestthatthedecisionbereopenedbytheapprovalbody.Theapprovalbodymaymodifyhisdecisionifmaterialevidencenotreadilydiscoverablepriortotheoriginaldecisionisfoundorifhefindstherewasmisrepresentationoffact.Afterreviewofthereconsiderationrequest,iftheapprovalbodyfindssufficientevidencetoamendtheoriginaldecision,therewillbenofurtherextensionoftheappealperiod.Anypersonwishingtotakefurtheractionmustfileaformalappealwithinthe14-dayappealtimeframe.EXPIRATION:Thevariance(s)approvalwillexpiretwo(2)yearsfromthedateofdecision.Avarianceone(1)yearextensionmayberequestedpursuanttoRMC4-9-250B.17.THEAPPEARANCEOFFAIRNESSDOCTRINE:providesthatnoexparte(privateone-on-one)communicationsmayoccurconcerningthelandusedecision.TheDoctrineappliesnotonlytotheinitialdecision,buttoAppealstotheHearingExamineraswell.Allcommunicationsafterthedecision/approvaldatemustbemadeinwritingthroughtheHearingExaminer.Allcommunicationsarepublicrecordandthispermitsallinterestedpartiestoknowthecontentsofthecommunicationandwouldallowthemtoopenlyrebuttheevidenceinwriting.AnyviolationofthisdoctrinecouldresultintheinvalidationoftheappealbytheCourt.ReyesVarianceReport C 103.0 FEET N 89d 48 00”E < 0 5 1 20 LAND USE INFORMATION ADDRESS:220 GARDEN AVE N RENTON WA 98055 PARCEL NUMBER:135230-0120 ________________ CAR WORKS ADD TO RENTON Plat Block:2;PIat Lot:8 CITY OF RENTON,KING COUNTY ,WA. R-8 SINGLE FAMILY 4,120 S.F. -30-0’ TO CENTERLINE w > LU 0 I 12.14 .4 mx= -I 0 E 1E 20 I — 43-4’4-3”.-6’-0”.-_20’-0_--28-0” —18’DESIGNS 8 SANITARY SEWER 25-0” N 89U 4W 00”E SETBACK PER INTERIM RULES -206 365 2724 vce CENTERLINE 206 499 2814 cell —-email: -.-.—-—---—.—luckeyjo@gmail.com (E)STAIRS ---(E)DRIVEWAY -:- —MOVED 493.28:sq ft --—---------—,--I -—- I (C)DECK lE)RIDGE.-C) J :141;98sqft’ —41 I _______- ____ A U /U ...U REYES ADDITION (E)HOUSE -J ________ ADDITION.640.00 sq ft Z 440 sq.ft. I -z---------————------- STAIROK.--—— _________ V V -.EN?xxxxxxx -EXISTING HOUSE - ____________ NEWADDITION 10)&FINISHED GRADE ELEV:0.0 FEET -——- 20-0 28-0”Z Site Plan - ___ - (E)NON CONFORMING SCALE I =10 IN SETBACK QU BUILDING AREA ANALYSIS ________ EXISTING NET NEW TOTALS ---——-—--—- ______________ BASEMENT :620 S.F.440 S.F.1060 S.F.2 Lii IC ZW MAIN FLOOR:620 S.F.440 S.F.1060 S.F.—<z _____________ U) UPPER FLOOR IEICONVERTED 0.255 S.F.255 S.F.0 UPPER FLOOR 336 S.F.440 S.F.882 S.F. TOTAL:1572 S.F.1575 S.F.3147 S.F. (E)DECKS I PORCHES:U) DECKS I PORCHES:264 S.F 142 S.F 406 S.F (E)GARAGE NIA NIA ICEIVED “= ]UL202015 12.1 4.4 CITY OF RNTON PLANNING DIVISION LEGAL DESCRIPTION ZONING: LOT SIZE: BUILDING CRITERIA BUILDING SETBACKS:FRONT FRONT AVERAGE 17.58’REAR SIDE ALLOWABLE BUILDING HGT.:30 FEET 20-0 41+actual 25 FEET 1+actual 5’.o,. mx I I-I I-I j4J UERIDLAJ ASSUIAO EQUIPMENT &ENOCEDURES 0 S ftECRDIAC TUTU.St*T0*los USED TOO flIs FEDVEnUEDSE9.1*4EV CCURACR MEETS CR EDCS NAT.332—130—000. GENERAL NOTES I.TUE INFORMATiON 0101000 ON flitS RIP *10*000415 THEREDIATSDEn500.10 MADE ON THE DATE INDICATED 000 GUIONLYRECR0000400AS*40041*10 rUE COAER*L CONDITION0051040ATThATTOIL 2.5044004.DOT 1$RON IRONIC PURPOSE TAD N CTInotC0000OF.40700.SiTS. •045 lAW 0000 NIT 41.0RT 10 5440W EpooeIm OFITECONT.C CAY S.NO PROPONEY COANFE WONt SET Ill EDTIDJNCTICN *014IllsSURVEY. LEGAL DESCRIP11ON COT 8,01.0CR 2.CON WORKS *0TDIN 10 *0110*.AS RZCOA IN VOLTS.00.47.FDCORCS 04 4040 00.11115WASAWICTON. COON 01(0 FElICE V0.4 N OF USENOFONE 10 0 TO 20 30 Scale 1”10’ —[50032 N *EE2B1W .1.?.1Z../A 0C25 ONOSSUS UNE P 0.5 S SE 1040 N 2ND ST JUL 2 U 200 Silt PLAN for OSMAN REYES NE1/4.NW1/4.SEC.17,T.23 N..8.5 C..W.M. CITf OF RENTON.WASHINGTON Tyee Surveyors PROESSiONAL LAND URAEYORS 310040 AC.5.WMfllL 02.9*733 204—525-3660 7—2—15 15108 =10*1 E1IIHX]—C-)riibREYESADDITIONPROJECT220GARDENAVEN,RENTON,WA98057r.jSOUTH8eCDc,3CCD3-C,C33OC)-C..,CD0)CDC)r,r’zc-F’,--C)mCoG)z’IiiI.4 C:CREYESPROJECTJUSTIFICATIONFORVARIANCE6APR112015NowcomesOSMAND+MARIAREYEStoapplyforavarianceperthesetbacksasnowestablishedbytheintenmZoningcodepertheCityofRenton.Thereexistsonthepropertyasinglefamilyresidencethatwaserectedin1928andconsistsofAbasementof620s.f.,amainfloorwith620s.f.andanupperfloor(withnonconformingslopedtoflatceilingratio)of260s.f.TheintentofofMr.ReyesiftoexpandtheresidencewithanadditionproceedingWestoftheexistinghousewhereintheNewandexistings.f.wouldbeasfollows;(e)basement620s.f.+440netnew.f1060s.f.Ce)mainfloor620s.f.+440netnews.f.=1040s.f.(e)upperfloor250s.f.+440netnews.f.=882s.f.The250s.f.figureisforusableheadrooms.f.anddoesnotincludetheunusables.f.asdelineatedbytheslopingoftheexistingroofline.IntegraltothedesignbyMrLuckeyistheintegrationofthefe)upperfloorwiththenetnewaddition.TherebygivingMr.Reyesatotalof862s.f.oflegalheadroomspaceatthenewlyconfiguredupperfloor.The1928buildwassitedwiththeresidenceapproximately12offtherearpropertylineandassumedalley,therebyrenderingftnonconformingtocurrent2015zoningregulations.Variouszoningpersonnelhavestatedthatyoucannotbuildanynewstructurewithinthe25’setbackatgrade.IthasbeeninvestigatedbyMrLuckeythatitistruetherewillbenonews.f.builtatgrade.ItistheintentofMr.ReyestoonlybuildonlyOVERTHEEXISTINGFOOTPRINTOFTHEEXISTING1928HOUSEandnowhereelseinthe25’rearsetbackatgrade.ThereisnospecificlanguageintheRentonZoningCodethatprohibitsbuildingoveranexistingfootprintattheuggerfiogrievel.Thereislanguageaboutbuildingnetnewstructurehorizontallyatgradeinthe25’setbackwhichthispermitapplicationwouldnotdowhatsoever.SotheappealforavarianceistoobtainpermissiontoconnecttheexistingupperfloortothenewadditionperplanwhereinMR.Reyescanenjoythecompletedhouse.PerthecoloredElevations;theonlyincidenceofnonconformityperthe25setbackisindicatedbytheREDcoloredportion(seebelow)TheadditionoftheREDportionwillnotgermanelyaffecttheneighborstotheimmediatesouthandNorthanymoreorlessthanthenetnewadditionwillinitstotalityThereisanadditionalappealforavarianceperthenewinterimrulesofthesidesetbackof7’-6.Mr.ReyescurrentsetbackattheSOUTHpropertylineis5-0”.TheappealisfortheallowancetoproceedwiththenetnewadditiontobeINLINEwiththeexistinghouse.Justasanexampleinothernearbyjurisdictions;TheCityofKirklandhasforitssidesetbacks,whereinthetotalofthesetbackmustequal15-0”withoneofthedimensionmustbenolessthan5-0”Thissamelogic/ruleappliesaswelltotheCityofNewcastleaswell.Whileftisnotdirectlyapplicabletothisvariancerequestftdoesgototheintentandpracticeofthosejurisdictionsonmanagingtheirsetbacksforwhateverlogicandpurposetheywantedtoachieveintheirzoningcodes.Itwouldbeamajorredesignoftheentireprectascurrentlyconfiguredandunpracticalinadollaramount,tomovethenetnewaddition2’.6north(r-6”total)offthesouthpropertyline.Thepurposeandexecutionofthe7’-6”isunclearandatcrosspurposesgivenotherjurisdictionsexecutionofthesame.APRDR2ntcEXHIBIT4ri SUIHX]30.10U’500C”M0C,)O0’w*‘Cl)3030ra0.0‘-viU)“1pz‘3’>40z000Cz-CC-m0)m00z-tJzm0Iw0007NO—lBSI-.01.,40F)46C’)I—’0-0--1r’JL0Ca‘a0..‘_jI-.’00U)‘a0‘‘_JI-’I-’t’3cii0U)‘aCD0.-JF—’0F”i0‘a40-t::3030(MAINST.)MEADOWAVE.N.592f-i(MEADOWST.)I————_—-40460)1-C’)ro—F-’—wIO‘0a.00H0‘4;C.71I1F’-)r.Jr.——jC..)F.)-.1Ca-I-.0C-’)-,0)C)C)0‘aca*CaU)‘a‘a‘a‘a4nCD0‘F’F-’Ui‘)00U)‘a0—CF--’-“3Ca0Ca“CFACTORYAVE.N.10)C)._iF-’C’)‘3Cfl0U)‘a0’C)C)C)F.)00hbCb.66H30ib.66ib.61F)30(FACTORYST.)-0),0—I,ii040145.27110a.CIJF-.,0.0—‘-2.,C’)lq‘_—)1“--.1LI)-.‘—-‘S’U’_ob—---.‘.‘‘‘-.-6010Cl)‘0U)U)00‘C0F--’aF--’CC—CC’)CCrCC