Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Shoreline Management Permit_Renton Apron A.D Crew Shelter Guard House_15-000396
QDEPARTMENTOFCOMMUNITY-L2-ANDECONOMICDEVELOPMENTCommunity&EconomicPLANNINGDIVISIONSHORELINEMANAGEMENTACTOF1971PERMITFORSHORELINEMANAGEMENTEVALUATIONFORM&DECISIONDATEOFPERMITISSUANCE:July27,2015LANDUSEACTIONFILENO.:LUA15-000396,SMDATERECEIVEDJune9,2015DATEOFPUBLICNOTICE:June17,2015PursuanttoChapter90.58RCW,staffrecommendsthattheCityofRentongrantaShorelineSubstantialDevelopmentPermit.Thisactionisproposedonthefollowingapplication:PROJECTNAME:RentonApronA&DNewCrewShelter&GuardHousePROJECTMANAGER:VanessaDolbee,CurrentPlanningManagerOWNER:BoeingCorporation,737LoganAvenueN,Renton,WA98055CONTACT/APPLICANT:MarkClement,Boeing,P0Box3707MS1W-09,Seattle,WA98055PROJECTLOCATION:737LoganAvenueNand616WPerimeterRoadLEGALDESCRIPTIONS:RentonMunicipalAirportSite:PORSECS7&18-23-5&PORTOBINSDCINCLPORPLATTED&VACSTSLYWLYOFCOMMWW#2NOFNLNDIXIEAVE&ELYOFSTATEHWAY#5&ELY&SLYOFFOLGLNBEGONELYMGNSDHWAYATPT5FTSOFNLNOFLOT8BLK18BRYNMAWRTHE89.23FTTHN05-16-51E438.90FTTHN40-09-47E188.55FTTHN60FTTHN29-00-40W197.07FTTH588-27-28E90.83FTTHN01-32-32W40FTTH588-27-28E234.53FTTHS35-00-00E142.41FTTHE403.70FTLESSLOTS19TO22INCLBLK4RENTONREALESTATECOS1STADDLESSPORTIONFORLANEHANGARCONDOMINIUMRentonBoeingPlanSite:POROFE1/2OFSEC7-23-05LYELYOFCWW#2&NLYOFN6THSTINSE1/4OFSECLESSNPR/WLESSSTTGWVACLOGANSTLYNWLYOFLN30FTNWLYOFGOVMDRLNTGW2NDCLSHLDSAD]SUB]TOTWO20FTR/WESMTS&POROFSE1/4OFSE1/4OFSECBEGNXNSMGNOFN6THSTWITHWMGNLOGANAVETHSLYALGSDST995.34FTTHS89-18-45WTOELYMGNCWW#2THNALGSDMGNTOSMGNN6THSTTHETOBEGLESSBEGNWCORTHOFTHSELYALGWLYLN328.75FTTHN89-45-45E366.34FTTHN00-14-15WTOSMGNN6THST CityofRentonDeportmentofCommunity&EconomicDevelopmentShorelineMonogementPermitRentonApronA&0NewCrewShelter&GuardHouseLUA5-000396,SMDATEOFPERMIT:July27,2015Page20111THWTOBEGLESS137.70FTTHOFTGWPORSOFNW1/4SEC08-23-05&SE1/4SEC06-23-05&SW1/4SEC05-23-05LYNWLYOFNPR/W&SWLYOFLNBEGNXNWLYEXTOFNLNOFGL1WITHWMGNSDR/WIHW763.39FlTHN43-06-56W680.06FTM/LTOINNERHARBORLNTH546-52-27WALGSDLN607.89FTTOTPOBTH543-06-56E713.87FTTHS46-53-04W215FTTHS20-38-24WTONWLYMGNSDNPR/WSUB]TOSD20FTESMTSLESSBNOPERSTRIPADJPOROFSELYLNINSDSEC08-23-05LESSSTRD#7TGWVACLOGANSTLYNLYOFSPURTRACKS1GWBLKCLKWASHSHLDS3RDSUPPLLESSPORFORRDPERDEED20060817000676LESSPORPERDEED2006121200033$SEC-TWN-R:SEC7TWN23NR5EWITHINTHESHORELINESOF:CedarRiver,ReachAAPPLICABLEMASTERPROGRAM:CityofRentonPROPOSALDESCRIPTION:TheapplicantisrequestingaShorelineSubstantialDevelopmentPermitforanewcrewshelteratApronAandanewguardhouseatApronD.ApronAislocatedat616WPerimeterRd,attheRentonMunicipalAirportandApronDislocatedat737LoganAve.N,theBoeingPlantSite.BothsitesarelocatedwithintheShorelineJurisdictionoftheCedarRiver,ReachA,designatedasShorelineHighIntensity.ApronDiszonedUC-N2andApronAiszonedIM.Theareaofworkwouldbe580SFandnoworkwouldoccurwithin100feetoftheOrdinaryHighWaterMark(OHWM)oftheCedarRiver.Thenewcrewshelterwouldbe360SFinsizeandtheguardhousewouldbe$0SFinsizeforatotalof480SFonnewbuildings.Nonewimpervioussurfacewouldbeaddedtotheareaandnotreesand/orexistingvegetationwouldberemovedasaresultoftheproposedproject.TheapplicantprovidedaStreamStudy,HabitatDataReport,DrainageReportandaLightingImpingementStudywiththeapplication.FINDINGSOFFACT:1.TheapplicantisrequestingaShorelineSubstantialDevelopmentPermitfortheconstructionofanew360SFcrewshelterandassociatedutilitiesatApronAlocatedattheRentonMunicipalAirportandanew$0SFguardhouse(replacinganexistingguardhouse)andassociatedutilitiesattheBoeingPlantsite.2.BothApronAandDarecurrentlycomprisedof100percentimpervioussurfacesandbothsitesaredevelopedwithindustrialuses.3.Bothproposedbuildingswouldbeover100ft.fromtheCedarRiverOHWM,butwithinthe200ft.ShorelineJurisdiction.4.ApronAislocatedonthewestbankandApronDislocatedontheeastbankoftheCedarRiver,bothwithinReachAanddesignatedShorelineHighIntensity.5.Thecrewshelterwouldbeasingle-storymodularbuildingwithamaximumheightof14.5feetabovegrade.Theprojectwouldalsoincludenewundergrounddataand CityofRentonDeportmentofCommunity&EconomicDevelopmentShorelineMonogementPermitRentonApronA&DNewCrewShelter&GuardHouseLUAIS-000396,SMDATEOFPERMIT:July27,2015Page3of11electricalutilitiesrequiringtheexcavationofapproximately6.6cubicyardsofsoil.Twoexterioramber-huedLEDlights,oneateachofthetwodoorswouldbemountedonthesouthsideofthenewbuilding.6.Thenewguardhouseisproposedtoreplaceanexistingguardhouse.Thenewguardhousewouldhaveapproximatelythesamefootprintastheexistingguardhouse,totaling$0SFandamaximumheightof8.5feet.Oneexterioramber-huedLEDlightisproposedtobemountedonthewestfaceoftheproposedbuilding.Therewouldbenogrounddisturbancetoreplacetheguardhouse.7.Thesiteislocatedinaseismichazardarea,noothercriticalareasexistonsite.8.Representativesfromvariouscitydepartmentshavereviewedtheapplicationmaterialstoidentifyandaddressissuesraisedbytheproposeddevelopment.Thesecommentsarecontainedintheofficialfile,andtheessenceofthecommentshavebeenincorporatedintotheappropriatesectionsofthisreportandtheDepartmentalRecommendationattheendofthisreport.9.Theofficetrailwouldbeaccessorytotheindustrialairplanemanufacturinglocatedontheexistingsite,IndustrialUsesarepermittedoutrightinTable4-3-090E1ShorelineUseTable.10.ThefollowingtablecontainsprojectelementsintendedtocomplywiththeSMPbulkanddimensionalstandardsandpolicies,asoutlinedinRMC4-3-090:SHORELINEMASTERPROGRAMCRITERA:A.COMPREHENSIVEPLANCOMPLIANCEANDCONSISTENCY,SHORELINEELEMENT:ThesiteislocatedintheShorelineHigh-IntensityOverlayDistrict.TheobjectiveoftheHighIntensityOverlayistoprovideopportunitiesforlarge-scaleofficeandcommercialemploymentcentersaswellasmulti-familyresidentialuseandpublicservices.Thisdistrictprovidesopportunitiesforwater-dependentandwater-orienteduseswhileprotectingexistingecologicalfunctionsandrestoringecologicalfunctionsinareasthathavebeenpreviouslydegraded.Developmentmayalsoprovideforpublicuseand/orcommunityuse,especiallyaccesstoandalongthewater’sedge.TheproposaliscompliantwiththefollowingShorelinepolicies:PolicySH-14.Shorelineuseanddevelopmentshouldbecarriedoutinamannerthatpreventsormitigatesadverseimpactssothattheresultingecologicalconditiondoesnotbecomeworsethanthecurrentcondition.Thismeansensuringnonetlossofecologicalfunctionsandprocessesinalldevelopmentanduse.VPermittedusesshouldbedesignedandconductedtominimize,insofaraspractical,anyresultantdamagetotheecologyandenvironmentfRCW90.58.020).Shorelineecologicalfunctionsthatshouldbeprotectedinclude,butarenotlimitedto,fishandwildlifehabitat,foodchainsupport,andwatertemperaturemaintenance.Shorelineprocessesthatshallbeprotectedinclude,butarenotlimitedto,waterflow;littoral CityofRentonDeportmentofCommunity&EconomicDevelopmentShorelineMonogementPermitRentonApronA&DNewCrewShelter&GuardHouseLUA5-000396,SMDATEOFPERMIT:July27,2015Page4of11drift;erosionandaccretion;infiltration;groundwaterrechargeanddischarge;sedimentdelivery,transport,andstorage;largewoodydebrisrecruitment;organicmatterinput;nutrientandpathogenremoval;andstreamchannelformation/maintenance.ObjectiveSH-E.Existingeconomicusesandactivitiesontheshorelinesshouldiberecognizedandeconomicusesoractivitiesthatarewater-orientedshouldbeencouragedandsupported.PolicySH-18.Alleconomicactivitiesontheshorelineshallprovidefornonetlossofv”ecologicalfunctionsduringconstructionandoperation.B.DEVELOPMENTSTANDARDS:ThesubjectsiteisclassifiedasShorelineHighIntensityontheCityofRentonShorelineOverlayMap.Thefollowingdevelopmentstandardsareapplicabletotheproposal:1.NoNetLossRequiredShorelineuseanddevelopmentshallbecarriedoutinamannerthatpreventsormitigatesadverseimpactstoensurenonetlossofecologicalfunctionsandprocessesinalldevelopmentanduse.Permittedusesaredesignedandconductedtominimize,insofaraspractical,anyresultantdamagetotheecologyandenvironmentfRCW90.58.020).Shorelineecologicalfunctionsthatshallbeprotectedinclude,butarenotlimitedto,fishandwildlifehabitat,foodchainsupport,andwatertemperaturemaintenance.Shorelineprocessesthatshallbeprotectedinclude,butarenotlimitedto,waterflow;erosionandaccretion;infiltration;groundwaterrechargeanddischarge;sedimentdelivery,transport,andstorage;largewoodydebrisrecruitment;organicmatterinput;nutrientandpathogenremoval;andstreamchannelformation/maintenance.StaffComment:TheprovidedStandardStreamStudyNarrativeandHabitatDataReport,preparedbyAMECFosterWheeler,datedJune2015concludedthattheprojectwillresultinnonetlossofecologicalfunctionsintheriparianzoneoftheLCR_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _adjacenttoand100feetupstreamanddownstreamoftheprojectsite.2.ViewObstructionandVisualQualityViewCorridorsRequired:Wherecommercial,industrial,multipleuse,multi-familyand/ormulti-lotdevelopmentsareproposed,primarystructuresshallprovideforviewcorridorsbetweenbuildingswhereviewsoftheshorelineareavailablefromN/Apublicright-of-wayortrails.StaffComment:Theproposedcrewshelterandguardhousearenotprimarystructuresandtheutilitylineswouldbelocatedunderground.Furthermore,aCityParkislocatedbetweentheBoeingPropertyandtheOHWMoftheCedarRiver.This CityofRentonDeportmentofCommunity&EconomicDevelopmentShorelineManagementPermitRentonApronA&DNewCrewShelter&GuardHouseLUA5-0003g6,SMDATEOFPERMIT:July27,2015Page5of11parkprovidespublicaccessandviewstotheriver.MinimumSetbacksforCommercialDevelopmentAdjacenttoResidentialorParkUses:Allneworexpandedcommercialdevelopmentadjacenttoresidentialuseandpublicparksshallprovidefifteenfeet(15’)setbacksfromadjacentpropertiesto‘7attenuateproximityimpactssuchasnoise,lightandglare,andmayaddressscaleandaestheticimpacts.Fencingorlandscapeareasmayberequiredtoprovideavisualscreen.LightingRequirements:Displayandotherexteriorlightingshallbedesignedandoperatedsoastopreventglare,toavoidilluminatingnearbypropertiesusedfornoncommercialpurposes,andtopreventhazardsforpublictraffic.Methodsofcontrollingspilloverlightinclude,butarenotlimitedto,limitsontheheightoflightstructure,limitsonlightlevelsoffixtures,lightshields,andscreening.StaffComment:Theapplicanthasproposedthreenewlightfixturesforthetwobuildings.Thecrewshelterwouldhavetwonewlightsandtheguardhousewouldhaveone,allproposedtobeplacedoverthedoorways.Theapplicationindicatesthata7LED,120-volt,16.6-watt,amber-huedLEDwallpackfixturewouldbemountedapproximately10feetabovegradeforthecrewshelterand8feetabovegradefortheguardhouse.Theproposedfixturewouldhavefullcut-offdistributionwithambientdiffuser.WiththeapplicationaLightImpingementStudywasprovidedandpreparedbyCasneEngineering,Inc.,datedMay22,2015.Thestudyconcludesthatthesethreefixtureswouldhaveacombinedoutputof804lumens,equivalenttoasingle60Wincandescentlamp—butamberiscolorinsteadofwhite.TheLightImpingementStudyconcludesthattheuseoftheLEDamber-huedlighting,thehousing’sdesignedcut-offandtheType3distributionwillpreventerrantlightfromilluminatingtheadjacentCedarRiver.InadditionthestreamstudyconcludedthattheproposedprojectwouldhavenoeffectonexistinglightconditiononorneattheCedarRiver.ReflectedLightstoBeLimited:Buildingsurfacesonoradjacenttothewatershallemploymaterialsthatlimitreflectedlight.VStaffComment:Themodularstructuresarenotanticipatedtobebuiltwithreflectivematerials..IntegrationandScreeningofMechanicalEquipment:Buildingmechanicalequipmentshallbeincorporatedintobuildingarchitecturalfeatures,suchaspitchedroofs,tothemaximumextentfeasible.Wheremechanicalequipmentcannotbeincorporatedintoarchitecturalfeatures,avisualscreenshallbeprovidedconsistentwithbuildingexteriormaterialsthatobstructsviewsofsuchequipment.StaffComment:Basedontheprovidedelevations,itappearsnomechanicalequipmentwouldbeplacedontheroofofthebuildings.However.ifmechanical DATEOFPERMIT:July27,2015Page6of11equipmentwillbeplacedoneitherthecrewshelterortheguardhouseitshouldbescreened.Staffrecommends,asaconditionofapproval,thatallroofmountedmechanicalequipmentshallbescreened.VisualProminenceofFreestandingStructurestoBeMinimized:FacilitiesnotN/Aincorporatedintobuildingsincludingfences,piers,poles,wires,lights,andotherfreestandingstructuresshallbedesignedtominimizevisualprominence.MaximumStairandWalkwayWidth:Stairsandwalkwayslocatedwithinshorelinevegetatedbuffersshallnotexceedfourfeet(4’)inwidth;provided,thatwhereADAN/Arequirementsapply,suchfacilitiesmaybeincreasedtosixfeet(6’)inwidth.Stairwaysshallconformtotheexistingtopographytotheextentfeasible.3.CommunityDisturbances:Noise,odors,nightlighting,waterandlandtraffic,andotherstructuresandactivitiesshallbeconsideredinthedesignplansandtheirimpactsavoidedormitigated.Physicalorvisualaccesstoshorelinesshallbeincorporatedinallnewdevelopmentwhenthedevelopmentwouldeithergenerateademandforoneormoreformsofsuchaccess,wouldimpairexistinglegalaccessopportunitiesorrights,orisrequiredtomeetthespecificpoliciesandregulationsoftheShorelineMasterProgram.CedarRiverA:PublicphysicalaccessfromatrailparalleltothewatershouldbeprovidediftheRentonMunicipalAirportredevelopsinthefuture,balancedwithgoalsofecologicalrestoration.Shorelinedevelopmentsshalllocatethewater-dependent,water-related,andwater-enjoymentportionsoftheirdevelopmentsalongtheshoreline.Developmentanduseshallbedesignedinamannerthatdirectslandalterationtotheleastsensitiveportionsofthesitetomaximizevegetationconservation;minimizeimpervioussurfacesandrunoff;protectriparian,nearshoreandwetlandhabitats;protectwildlifeandhabitats;protectarchaeological,historicandculturalresources;andpreserveaestheticvalues.LocationofDevelopment:Developmentanduseshallbedesignedinamannerthatdirectslandalterationtotheleastsensitiveportionsofthesite.StaffComment:Boththecrewshelterandtheguardhouseareproposedinareasofexistingimpervioussurfacesandover100feetfromtheOHWM,thereforethelocationsidentifiedarelesssensitivethannon-developedareas.MinimallandCityofRentonDeportmentofCommunity&EconomicDevelopmentRentonApronA&DNewCrewShelter&GuardHouseShorelineMonogementPermitLUA5-000396,SM4.PublicAccess5.BuildingandDevelopmentLocation—ShorelineOrientation MinimizationofSiteAlteration:Developmentshallminimizesitealterationinsiteswithsubstantialunalterednaturalfeaturesbyapplyingthefollowingcriteria:(a)Vehicleandpedestriancirculationsystemsshallbedesignedtolimitclearing,grading,andalterationoftopographyandnaturalfeatures.(b)Impervioussurfacingforparkinglot/spaceareasshallbelimitedthroughtheuseofunder-buildingparkingorpermeablesurfaceswherefeasible.(c)Utilitiesshallshareroadwayanddrivewaycorridorsandrights-of-waywhereverfeasible.(d)Developmentshallbelocatedanddesignedtoavoidtheneedforstructuralshorelinestabilizationoverthelifeofthedevelopment.Exceptionsmaybemadeforthelimitedinstanceswherestabilizationisnecessarytoprotectalloweduses,particularlywater-dependentuses,wherenoalternativelocationsareavailableandnonetlossofecologicalfunctionswillresult.LocationforAccessoryDevelopment:Accessorydevelopmentorusethatdoesnotrequireashorelinelocationshallbelocatedoutsideofshorelinejurisdictionunlesssuchdevelopmentisrequiredtoserveapprovedwater-orientedusesand/ordevelopmentsorunlessotherwiseallowedinaHighIntensitydesignation.Whensitedwithinshorelinejurisdiction,usesand/ordevelopmentssuchasparking,servicebuildingsorareas,accessroads,utilities,signsandstorageofmaterialsshallbelocatedinlandawayfromtheland/waterinterfaceandlandwardofwater-orienteddevelopmentsand/orotherapprovedusesunlessalocationclosertothewaterisreasonablynecessary.NavigationandRecreationtoBePreserved:Shorelineusesshallnotdepriveother‘usesofreasonableaccesstonavigablewaters.Existingwater-relatedrecreationshallbepreserved.6.StandardsforDensity,Setbacks,andHeightSetbacksandbuffersfromtheOHWM:Fornon-waterorientedusesa100footsetbackisrequiredfromtheOHWM.vStaffComment:BoththeproposedcrewshelterandguardhousearelocatedfurtherfromtheOHWMthen100feet.VegetationConservationBuffer:100feet.V’CedarRiverReachAStandard:Enhancementofnativeriparianvegetationshallbeimplementedaspartofparkmanagement,balancedwithneedsoffloodcontrolCityofRentonDeportmentofCommunity&EconomicDevelopmentRentonApronA&DNewCrewShelter&GuardHouseDATEOFPERMIT:July27,2015Page7of11disturbancewouldberequiredforthedevelopment.ShorelineMonogementPermitLUA5-000396,SMN/A CityofRentonDeportmentofCommunity&EconomicDevelopmentShorelineMonagementPermitRentonApronA&0NewCrewShelter&GuardHouseLUAS-000396,SMDATEOFPERMIT:July27,2015PageSof11leveesandopportunitiestoprovidepublicvisualandphysicalaccesstotheshoreIineBuildingHeight—Maximum:Inwater—35ft.Within100feetofOHWM—35ft.Morethan100feetfromtheOHWM—35ft.Heightuptothatestablishedinchapter4-2RMC,ZoningDistricts—UsesandStandards,maybeallowedfornon-water-dependentusesinthefollowingreaches:LakeWashingtonReachesC,H,I,andi;CedarRiverReachesA,B,andC;BlackRiverReachA;MayCreekReachB;andSpringbrookCreekReachesB,C,andD:Forbuildingslandwardofonehundredfeet(100’)fromOHWM,themaximumbuildingheightshallbedefinedbyamaximumallowablebuildingheightenvelopethatshall:i.Beginalongalinelayingparalleltoandonehundredfeet(100’)fromOHWMataheightofeitherthirtyfivefeet(35’)oronehalf(1/2)themaximumheightallowedintheunderlyingzone,whicheverisgreater;andii.Haveanupward,landwardtransitionataslopeofoneverticaltoonehorizontalfromthebeginningheighteither(a)untilthelineatwhichthemaximumheightallowedintheunderlyingzoninginchapter4-2RMCisreached(fromwhichlinetheheightenvelopeshallextendlandwardatthemaximumheightallowedintheunderlyingzoning),or(b)totheendofshorelinejurisdiction,whichevercomesfirst.ImperviousareawithintheBuffer/Setback:5%v”StaffComment:Theprojectwouldnotresultinanincreaseinimperviousservicearea.Imperviousareawithin100feetoftheOHWM:50%N/A..Footnote11:NolimitfortheRentonMunicipalAirport.7.UseRegulations:a.IndustrialUse:IndustrialdevelopmentsshallbepermittedsubjecttothefollowingExistingNon-Water-DependentUses:Existingnon-water-dependentusesmayberetainedandexpanded,subjecttoprovisionsfornonconformingusesactivitiesand,,sites;provided,thatexpansionofstructureswithintherequiredsetbackbetweenthebuildingandthewatershallbeprohibitedunlessitisdemonstratedthattheimpactsoftheexpansioncanbemitigatedthroughon-sitemeasures,suchasbufferenhancementorlowimpactstormwaterdevelopment.Changesinusearelimitedto CityofRentonDeportmentofCommunity&EconomicDevelopmentShorelineManogementPermitRentonApronA&DNewCrewShelter&GuardHouseLUA15-000396,SMDATEOFPERMIT:July27,2015PageSot11existingstructures.StaffComment:TheexistingAirportandBoeingManufacturingPlanarenon-waterdependentuses,howevertheyhavebeenlegallyestablished.TheAirporthasbeenidentifiedasanessentialpublicfacilityandwouldbeexemptfromBuffersandSetbackspursuanttoRMC3-4-090D.7.d.vi.Furthermore,bothprojectsarecompliantwiththebuffersandsetbacksidentifiedinTable4-3-090D.7a—ShorelineBulkStandardsandasdemonstratedaboveunder6.StandardsforDensity,Setback,andHeight.Therefore,theprojectscomplywiththedevelopmentstandards.Pursuanttothenonconformingsitestableanexpansionofbuildingfootprintbymorethan500SFor10%,whicheverisless,isconsideredtobeaminoralteration.IftheprojectiscinderedaminoralterationperRMC4-10-095F.1,PartialComplianceforNon-Single-FamilyDevelopment,siteimprovementswouldberequired.However,theprojectwouldnotresultinmorethan500SFofexpansions.Theguardhouseisareplacementofanexistingstructure,resultinginasmallerbuildingthanexiststodayby40SF.Thenewcrewshelteris360SF.Overall,thetotalnewsquarefootageofbuildingsproposedatthesitewouldbe320SF(360SFcrewshelter-40SFforthereductionintheguardhousesize=320SF).ClusteringofNon-Water-OrientedUses:Anynewuseoffacilityorexpansionofexistingfacilitiesshallminimizeandclusterthosewater-dependentandwater-relatedportionsofthedevelopmentalongtheshorelineandplaceinlandallfacilitieswhicharenotwater-dependent.Over-WaterStructures:Over-waterstructuresareallowedonlyforthoseportionsofwater-dependentindustrialusesthatrequireover-waterfacilities.Anyover-waterN/Astructureiswater-dependent,islimitedtothesmallestreasonabledimensions,andissubjecttoshorelineconditionaluseapproval.NoDischargeAllowed:Eachindustrialuseshalldemonstratethatnospillordischargetosurfacewaterswillresultfromtheuseorshalldemonstrateinthepermitapplicationaspecificprogramtocontainandcleanupspillsordischargesof“pollutantsassociatedwiththeindustrialuseandactivity.StaffComment:TheBoeingManufacturingFacilityoperatesunderaDOEIndustrialStormwaterPermit,whichrequiresaStormwaterPollutionPreventionPlan(SWPPP).Developmentofthisprojectshallbeundertakenpursuanttothefollowingtermsandconditions:1.Allroofmountedmechanicalequipmentshallbescreened. CityofRentonDeportmentofCommunity&EconomicDevelopmentShorelineMonogementPermitRentonApronA&DNewCrewShelter&GuardHouseLUA15-000396,SMDATEOFPERMIT:July27,2015Page10of11ThisPermitisgrantedpursuanttotheShorelineManagementActionof1971andpursuanttothefollowing:1.TheissuanceofalicenseundertheShorelineManagementActof1971shallnotreleasetheapplicantfromcompliancewithfederal,state,andotherpermitrequirements.2.ThispermitmayberescindedpursuanttoSection14(7)oftheShorelineManagementActof1971intheeventthepermitteefailstocomplywithanycondition(s)hereof.3.Constructionpermitsshallnotbeissueduntiltwenty-one(21)daysafterapprovalbytheWashingtonStateDepartmentofEcologyoruntilanyreviewproceedingsinitiatedwithinthistwenty-one(21)dayreviewperiodhavebeencompleted.DATEOFDECISIONONLANDUSEACTION:SIGNATURE:‘1JenniferHenning,AICP,PlanningDirectorDateDepartmentofCommunity&EconomicDevelopmentAPPEALS:AppealsofShorelineSubstantialDevelopmentPermitissuancemustbemadedirectlytotheShorelinesHearingsBoard.Appealsaremadebyfilingarequestinwritingwithinthetwenty-one(21)daysofreceiptofthefinalorderandconcurrentlyfilingcopiesofsuchrequestwiththeWashingtonStateDepartmentofEcologyandtheAttorneyGeneral’sofficeasprovidedinsection18(1)oftheShorelinesManagementActof1971.AllcopiesofappealnoticesshallalsobefiledwiththeCityofRentonPlanningDivisionandtheCityClerk’soffice.RECONSIDERATION:Within14daysofthedecisiondate,anypartymayrequestthatthedecisionbereopenedbytheapprovalbody.Theapprovalbodymaymodifyhisdecisionifmaterialevidencenotreadilydiscoverablepriortotheoriginaldecisionisfoundorifhefindstherewasmisrepresentationoffact.Afterreviewofthereconsiderationrequest,iftheapprovalbodyfindssufficientevidencetoamendtheoriginaldecision,therewillbenofurtherextensionoftheappealperiod.Anypersonwishingtotakefurtheractionmustfileaformalappealwithinthe14-dayappealtimeframe.EXPIRATION:UnlessadifferenttimeperiodisspecifiedintheshorelinepermitasauthorizedbyRCW90.58.143andsubsectioniiofRMC4-9-190,constructionactivities,orauseoractivity,forwhichapermithasbeengrantedpursuanttothisMasterProgrammustbecommencedwithintwo(2)yearsoftheeffectivedateofashorelinepermit,ortheshorelinepermitshallterminate,andanewpermitshallbenecessary.However,thePlanningDivisionmayauthorizeasingleextensionforaperiodnottoexceedoneyearbasedonreasonablefactors,ifarequestforextensionhasbeenfiledwiththePlanningDivisionbeforethe CityofRentonDepartmentofCommunity&EconomicDevelopmentShorelineManagementPermitRentonApronA&DNewCrewShelter&GuardHouseLUA15-000396,SMDATEOFPERMIT:July27,2015Page11of11expirationdate,andnoticeoftheproposedextensionisgiventopartiesofrecordandtheWashingtonStateDepartmentofEcology.DEFINITIONOFCOMMENCEMENTOFCONSTRUCTIONACTIVITIES:theconstructionapplicationsmustbesubmitted,permitsmustbeissued,andfoundationinspectionsmustbecompletedbeforetheendofthetwo(2)yearperiod.Exhibits/Attachments:StandardStreamStudyNarrativeandHabitatDataReport(whichincludesarchitecturaldrawingsforelevationsandsiteplan,lightingspecifications,andlightimpingementstudy).cc:AttorneyGeneral’sOfficeKarenWalter,MuckleshootIndianTribeFisheriesDept.BoeingCorporation/OwnerMarkClement/Applicant/ContactCityofRentonOfficialFile STANDARD STREAM STUDY NARRATIVE AND HABITAT DATA REPORT Boeing Aprons A and D New Crew Shelter and Guardhouse Project Renton, Washington Prepared for: The Boeing Company Renton, Washington Prepared by: Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 3500 188th Street SW, Suite 601 Lynnwood, Washington 98037 (425) 921-4000 June 2015 Project No. LY15160360 Amec Foster Wheeler Project No. LY15160360 i p:\boeing renton\ly15160360 apron d permitting\reports\streamstudynarrative\aprond_streamstudyhabitatrpt_060115.docx TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 2.0 STANDARD STREAM STUDY NARRATIVE ................................................................. 7 2.1 STREAM CLASSIFICATION ...................................................................................... 7 2.2 VEGETATIVE COVER ............................................................................................. 7 2.3 ECOLOGICAL FUNCTION ........................................................................................ 8 2.4 FISH AND WILDLIFE ............................................................................................... 9 2.4.1 Mammals ................................................................................................ 9 2.4.2 Birds ........................................................................................................ 9 2.4.3 Amphibians and Reptiles ...................................................................... 10 2.4.4 Fish ....................................................................................................... 10 2.5 MEASURES TO PROTECT TREES AND VEGETATION .............................................. 12 2.6 NO NET LOSS OF ECOLOGICAL FUNCTION ........................................................... 12 3.0 HABITAT DATA REPORT ............................................................................................ 13 3.1 HABITAT DIVERSITY ............................................................................................ 13 3.2 MIGRATION CORRIDORS ..................................................................................... 14 3.3 SPECIES AND COVER TYPES ............................................................................... 14 3.4 IDENTIFICATION OF DISTURBED AREAS ................................................................ 15 3.5 EXISTING HABITAT VALUES AND FUNCTIONS ........................................................ 15 3.5.1 Temperature ......................................................................................... 16 3.5.2 Water Quality ........................................................................................ 16 3.5.3 Reach Sinuosity .................................................................................... 16 3.5.4 Vegetative Conditions ........................................................................... 17 3.5.5 Floodplain Condition ............................................................................. 17 3.5.6 Habitat Values and Functions at the Project Site .................................. 17 3.6 HABITAT ALTERATIONS AND IMPACTS AND PROPOSED HABITAT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM .......................................................................................................... 17 4.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................. 19 TABLES Table 1 Small Mammals Reported to Occur Along the Lower Cedar River Table 2 Birds Reported to Occur Along the Lower Cedar River Table 3 Non-Native Fish Species Introduced into the Lake Washington/Lake Union System Table 4 Different Aquatic Life Uses and Their Associated Numeric Temperature Criteria TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Amec Foster Wheeler ii Project No. LY15160360 p:\boeing renton\ly15160360 apron d permitting\reports\streamstudynarrative\aprond_streamstudyhabitatrpt_060115.docx FIGURES Figure 1 Vicinity Map Figure 2 Overall Architectural Site Plan Figure 3 Aerial Photo of Aprons A and D Project Sites Figure 4 Apron A Site Plan Figure 5 Apron A Crew Shelter Plan View Figure 6 Apron A Crew Shelter Exterior Elevations Figure 7 Apron D Site Plan Figure 8 Apron D Guardhouse Plan View and Exterior Elevations Figure 9 Light Impingement Study – Existing Conditions on East Shoreline Figure 10 Light Impingement Study – Existing Conditions on West Shoreline Figure 11 Light Impingement Study – Proposed Conditions on East Shoreline Figure 12 Light Impingement Study – Proposed Conditions on West Shoreline APPENDIX Appendix A Lighting Specifications Appendix B Photographic Log Appendix C Light Impingement Study Amec Foster Wheeler Project No. LY15160360 1 p:\boeing renton\ly15160360 apron d permitting\reports\streamstudynarrative\aprond_streamstudyhabitatrpt_060115.docx STANDARD STREAM STUDY NARRATIVE AND HABITAT DATA REPORT Boeing Aprons A and D New Crew Shelter and Guardhouse Project Renton, Washington 1.0 INTRODUCTION As part of the Renton plant transition from the 737 next generation to the new 737 MAX program, The Boeing Company (Boeing) proposes to build a new crew shelter on existing Apron A and relocate an existing guardhouse on existing Apron D to support flight crew operations. These proposed modifications to Aprons A and D (Figures 1 through 3) will occur within the 200-foot shoreline zone. The new crew shelter will be constructed on Apron A, which is located on the west bank of the lower Cedar River (LCR), and the existing guardhouse will be replaced on Apron D, which is located on the east bank of the LCR (Figures 4 through 8). The proposed project will include other activities outside of the shoreline zone that are not discussed in this report. The proposed crew shelter to be placed on Apron A will be a single-story modular building with a 12-foot by 30-foot (360-square-foot) footprint and a maximum height of 14.5 feet above grade. The building will be mounted 2.5 feet above grade and access will be provided via external steps and a ramp (compliant with American with Disabilities Act standards) (Figures 5 and 6). The proposed crew shelter also will include new underground data and electrical utilities requiring the excavation of approximately 6.6 cubic yards of soil. Two exterior amber-hued light-emitting-diode (LED) lights, one at each of the two doors, will be mounted on the south side of the new crew shelter (Figure 6). Specifications for the exterior lights are provided in Appendix A. An existing guardhouse on Apron D will be replaced with a new guardhouse that will occupy nearly the same footprint as the existing guardhouse (Figures 2, 3, and 8). The new guardhouse will have an 8-foot by 10-foot (80-square-foot) footprint with a maximum height of 8.5 feet. One exterior amber- hued LED light (see Appendix A for lighting specification) will be mounted on the west face of the proposed guardhouse (Figure 8). Guardhouse replacement will not require ground disturbance. The proposed project will occur on developed property consisting of paved, impermeable surfaces and will not result in the creation of additional impermeable surface area. No vegetation is present in the proposed project area (Figure 3). No construction activities will occur and no structures will be placed below the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) of the LCR. Amec Foster Wheeler 2 Project No. LY15160360 p:\boeing renton\ly15160360 apron d permitting\reports\streamstudynarrative\aprond_streamstudyhabitatrpt_060115.docx The City of Renton has expressed concerns with previous Boeing projects regarding potential light impingement on the adjacent LCR resulting from installation of external light fixtures within the 200- foot shoreline zone. This report assesses potential habitat alteration to the LCR due to the proposed installation of external amber-hued LED lighting on the new crew shelter (Apron A) and guardhouse (Apron D). Boeing conducted a lighting impingement study to assess potential alterations in light conditions on the LCR adjacent to the project site attributable to the proposed project. The results of this study are discussed in Section 3.5.7 below. Under the Renton Municipal Code (RMC) 4-8-120C (Submittal Requirements – Specific to Application Type: Land Use Applications), the City requires the following environmental reports to be included with Boeing’s permit application submittal for the proposed project: Stream or Lake Study, Standard: A report shall be prepared by a qualified biologist, unless otherwise determined by the Administrator, and include the following information: a. Site Map: Site map(s) indicating, at a scale no smaller than one inch equals twenty feet (1" = 20') (unless otherwise approved by the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development or designee): i. The entire parcel of land owned by the applicant, including one hundred feet (100') of the abutting parcels through which the water body(ies) flow(s); ii. The OHWM determined in the field by a qualified biologist pursuant to RMC 4-3-050L1b (the OHWM must also be flagged in the field); iii. Stream or lake classification, as recorded in the City of Renton Water Class Map in RMC 4-3-050Q4 or RMC 4-3-090 (if unclassified, see “Supplemental Stream or Lake Study” below); iv. Topography of the site and abutting lands in relation to the stream(s) and its/their buffer(s) at contour intervals of two feet (2') where slopes are less than ten percent (10%), and of five feet (5') where slopes are ten percent (10%) or greater; v. One hundred (100) year floodplain and floodway boundaries, including one hundred feet (100') of the abutting parcels through which the water body(ies) flow(s); vi. Site drainage patterns, using arrows to indicate the direction of major drainage flow; vii. Top view and typical cross-section views of the stream or lake bed, banks, and buffers to scale; Amec Foster Wheeler Project No. LY15160360 3 p:\boeing renton\ly15160360 apron d permitting\reports\streamstudynarrative\aprond_streamstudyhabitatrpt_060115.docx viii. The vegetative cover of the entire site, including the stream or lake, banks, riparian area, and/or abutting wetland areas, extending one hundred feet (100') upstream and downstream from the property line. Include position, species, and size of all trees at least ten inches (10") average diameter that are within one hundred feet (100') of the OHWM; ix. The location, width, depth, and length of all existing and proposed structures, roads, stormwater management facilities, wastewater treatment and installations in relation to the stream/lake and its/their buffer(s); and x. Location of site access, ingress and egress. b. Grading Plan: A grading plan prepared in accordance with RMC 4-8-120D7, and showing contour intervals of two feet (2') where slopes are less than ten percent (10%), and of five feet (5') where slopes are ten percent (10%) or greater. c. Stream or Lake Assessment Narrative: A narrative report on eight and one-half inch (8.5") by eleven inch (11") paper shall be prepared to accompany the site plan and describes: i. The stream or lake classification as recorded in the City of Renton Water Class Map in RMC 4-3-050Q4 or RMC 4-3-090; ii. The vegetative cover of the site, including the stream or lake, banks, riparian area, wetland areas, and flood hazard areas extending one hundred feet (100') upstream and downstream from the property line, including the impacts of the proposal on the identified vegetation; iii. The ecological functions currently provided by the stream/lake and existing riparian area and the impacts of the proposal on the identified ecological functions; iv. Observed or reported fish and wildlife that make use of the area including, but not limited to, salmonids, mammals, and bird nesting, breeding, and feeding/foraging areas, including the impacts of the proposal on the identified fish and wildlife; v. Measures to protect trees, as defined per RMC 4-11-200, and vegetation; and vi. For shorelines regulated under RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program, the study shall demonstrate if the proposal meets the criteria of no net loss of ecological functions as described in RMC 4-3-090D2. If the proposal requires mitigation for substantial impacts to the existing vegetation buffer in order to demonstrate no net loss of ecological functions, a supplemental stream or lake study may be required by the Administrator of the Department Amec Foster Wheeler 4 Project No. LY15160360 p:\boeing renton\ly15160360 apron d permitting\reports\streamstudynarrative\aprond_streamstudyhabitatrpt_060115.docx of Community and Economic Development or designee. (Ord. 5137, 4-25-2005; Ord. 5633, 10-24-2011). Habitat Data Report: Habitat data reports include: a. Site Plan: The site plan shall indicate: i. The vegetative cover types reflecting the general boundaries of the different plant communities on the site; ii. The exact locations and specifications for all activities associated with site development including the type, extent and method of operations; iii. Top view and typical cross-section views of critical habitat/wildlife habitat to scale; iv. The results of searches of the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife’s Natural Heritage and Non-Game Data System databases; v. The results of searches of the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Priority Habitat and Species database. b. Narrative Report: A narrative report shall be prepared to accompany the site plan which describes: i. The layers, diversity and variety of habitat found on the site; ii. The location of any migration or movement corridors; iii. The species typically associated with the cover types, including an identification of any critical wildlife species that might be expected to be found; iv. Identification of any areas that have been previously disturbed or degraded by human activity or natural processes; v. A summary of existing habitat functions and values, utilizing a habitat evaluation procedure or methodology approved by the City; vi. A summary of proposed habitat alterations and impacts and proposed habitat management program. Potential impacts may include but are not limited to clearing of vegetation, fragmentation of wildlife habitat, expected decrease in species diversity or Amec Foster Wheeler Project No. LY15160360 5 p:\boeing renton\ly15160360 apron d permitting\reports\streamstudynarrative\aprond_streamstudyhabitatrpt_060115.docx quantity, changes in water quality, increases in human intrusion, and impacts on wetlands or water resources. (Ord. 4835, 3-27-2000) This report provides a description of the environmental and habitat attributes of the project site where the proposed project is to occur, as defined by RMC 4-8-120C. Sections 2.0 and 3.0 present the requisite information for the Standard Stream Narrative and Habitat Data Report, respectively. Amec Foster Wheeler 6 Project No. LY15160360 p:\boeing renton\ly15160360 apron d permitting\reports\streamstudynarrative\aprond_streamstudyhabitatrpt_060115.docx (This page intentionally left blank) Amec Foster Wheeler Project No. LY15160360 7 p:\boeing renton\ly15160360 apron d permitting\reports\streamstudynarrative\aprond_streamstudyhabitatrpt_060115.docx 2.0 STANDARD STREAM STUDY NARRATIVE This section presents the standard stream study narrative, providing information about existing habitat conditions and functions of the LCR adjacent to the proposed project site. 2.1 STREAM CLASSIFICATION According to RMC 4-3-050Q4 (City of Renton Water Class Map), the LCR in the vicinity of the project site is Class 1 water. 2.2 VEGETATIVE COVER An Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. (Amec Foster Wheeler) biologist, Bob Stuart, conducted site surveys on May 12, 2015, May 14, 2014 and on November 24, 2014 to assess habitat conditions and vegetative cover along the LCR shoreline adjacent to and within 100 feet of the project site. The project site is defined as those portions of Aprons A and D within the 200-foot shoreline zone adjacent to the LCR. Aprons A and D are currently used by Boeing to support their 737 manufacturing program. The Boeing facility on the east shoreline of the LCR and the Renton Municipal Airport on the west shoreline of the LCR consist primarily of concrete and asphalt surfaces. A vegetation survey was conducted along the east and west banks of the LCR adjacent to and extending 100 feet upstream and downstream of the project site (Figure 3). Appendix B provides a photographic log depicting habitat conditions and vegetation along the riparian zone of the east and west banks of the LCR adjacent to the project site. The riparian zone along the west bank of the LCR south of and within 100 feet of the project site is narrow (6 to 12 feet wide), abutting an 8-foot-high concrete flood-control wall (Appendix B, Photos 1, 2, 4, and 9). Riparian vegetation at the time of the visits was very sparse and was limited primarily to patches of reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea), Japanese knotweed (Polygonum cuspidatum), horsetail (Equisetum fluviatile), Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus), and alder (Alnus rubra) (Appendix B, Photos 5 through 9). Reed canarygrass, Japanese knotweed, and Himalayan blackberry are listed as noxious weeds by King County. The width of the riparian area is limited by the concrete flood-control wall (Appendix B, Photos 1 and 2). No trees with trunks greater than or equal to 10 inches in diameter at breast-height (DBH) are located within 100 feet of south of the project site on the west bank. The west bank of the LCR within 100 feet north of the project site is more heavily vegetated than that south of the project site (Figure 3; Appendix B, Photos 10 through 12). Vegetation on the west bank of the LCR within 100 feet north of the project site consists of alder, unidentified species of willow (Salix Amec Foster Wheeler 8 Project No. LY15160360 p:\boeing renton\ly15160360 apron d permitting\reports\streamstudynarrative\aprond_streamstudyhabitatrpt_060115.docx spp.), reed canarygrass, Japanese knotweed, and Himalayan blackberry, as well as an unidentified species of evergreen tree. No trees with trunks greater than or equal to 10 inches DBH are located within 100 feet north of the project site on the west bank. Within 100 feet south of the project site, the east bank of the LCR is more heavily vegetated than the west bank (Figure 3; Appendix B, Photo 13). Riparian vegetation on the east bank south of the project site is similar to that located on the west bank north of the project site, with the exception that the riparian corridor is not confined by a flood-control wall. The Cedar River Trail Park, maintained by the City of Renton, is located along the east bank of the LCR and consists of manicured lawns, ornamental shrubs, and native vegetation (Appendix B, Photo 15). An 8-foot-wide asphalt pedestrian path is located in the Cedar River Trail Park, within 60 feet of the LCR. The Boeing plant is located within 75 feet of the LCR (Figures 2 and 3). No trees with trunks greater than or equal to 10 inches DBH are located within 100 feet south of the project site on the east bank. The vegetation on the east bank of the LCR within 100 feet north of the project site is similar to that south of the project site (Appendix B, Photos 14 through 18). The Cedar River Trail Park extends along the east shore of the LCR north to the Boeing property near the mouth of the LCR and consists of manicured lawns, ornamental shrubs, and native vegetation, and an asphalt pedestrian path (Figure 3; Appendix B, Photo 15). No trees with trunks greater than or equal to 10 inches DBH are located within 100 feet north of the project site on the east bank. 2.3 ECOLOGICAL FUNCTION Riparian habitats have important ecological functions other than providing habitat for birds and other wildlife. Healthy riparian vegetation protects banks from erosion, influences in-channel aquatic habitats, maintains favorable water temperature for fish through shading, filters runoff, and provides nutrients. Riparian vegetation creates meanders, increases habitat complexity, and can protect against scour during severe storm events. Riparian habitats link upland and aquatic habitats. Upland habitats have a critical role in watershed function and affect riparian and aquatic habitats, particularly in drier, low-elevation sites. The riparian zone along the east and west banks of the LCR within 100 feet of the project site is sparsely vegetated and includes a number of invasive species, as discussed in Section 2.2, above. The primary ecological functions provided by riparian vegetation along the east and west banks of the LCR within 100 feet of the project site include: Nesting and foraging habitat for birds and small mammals, Input of terrestrial insects from overhanging vegetation, Amec Foster Wheeler Project No. LY15160360 9 p:\boeing renton\ly15160360 apron d permitting\reports\streamstudynarrative\aprond_streamstudyhabitatrpt_060115.docx Input of allochthonous organic matter (via leaf fall), Limited erosion control, and Limited habitat complexity. The LCR is a manmade channel created in 1912 when the river was diverted as a tributary to the former Black River directly to Lake Washington. The LCR is channelized and substantially altered, so that there is very limited riparian area to provide all of the potential ecological functions of an unaltered habitat. Riparian vegetation provides very little, if any, shading to the LCR because of the dominance of small shrubs and the lack of large trees. Both banks of the river in the project area are contained within levees and/or flood-control walls, so there is no potential for the creation of meanders or off-channel habitat. Because of extensive development along both banks of the river in the project area (Boeing to the east and west and the Renton Municipal Airport to the west), there is little, if any, transition between riparian and upland habitats. 2.4 FISH AND WILDLIFE This section addresses fish and wildlife species that may use the LCR in the vicinity of the project site. 2.4.1 Mammals No mammals or signs of mammal use were observed during the site visits. Given the level of development in the project area, it is likely that only small mammals such as squirrels, mice, rats, voles, moles, raccoons, opossums, muskrats, and river otters use the riparian areas along the LCR shoreline within 100 feet of the project area. Richter and Azous (1997), conducting small-mammal surveys in a wetland along the LCR, reported 13 species of mammals (Table 1). These, as well as other small mammals common to the Puget lowlands, may occur along the LCR adjacent to the project site. 2.4.2 Birds Several bird species were observed during the site visits, including American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos), American robin (Turdus migratorius), Canada goose (Branta canadensis), and European starling (Sturnus vulgaris). Richter and Azous (1997) conducted bird surveys in a wetland of the LCR between late May and mid-June in 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, and 1995 to determine distribution and relative abundance. They reported 58 species of birds (Table 2). It is likely that these, as well as other species of birds common to the Puget lowlands, nest or forage in the project vicinity. Amec Foster Wheeler 10 Project No. LY15160360 p:\boeing renton\ly15160360 apron d permitting\reports\streamstudynarrative\aprond_streamstudyhabitatrpt_060115.docx 2.4.3 Amphibians and Reptiles No amphibians or reptiles were observed during the site visits; however, it is likely that amphibian (e.g., Anurans) and reptile species (e.g., turtles) found in the Lake Washington basin may use the areas within the site vicinity. Richter and Azous (1997) reported the occurrence of six amphibian species in the LCR: Ensatina (salamander) (Ensatina eschscholtzii), Long-toed salamander (Ambystoma macrodactylus), Northwestern salamander (A. gracile), Pacific tree frog (Pseudoacris regilla), Red-legged frog (Rana aurora), and Western red-backed salamander (Plethodon vehiculum). No information was located listing reptile species occurring along the LCR in the project vicinity; however, reptiles listed for King County (King County, 2008) that could occur in the project vicinity include: Common garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis), Northern alligator lizard (Elgaria coerulea), Northwestern garter snake (T. ordinoides), Painted turtle (Chrysemys picta), Rubber boa (Charina bottae), Slider (Trachemys scripta), Western fence lizard (Sceloporus occidentalis), and Western terrestrial garter snake (T. elegans). 2.4.4 Fish Small fish were observed jumping in the LCR adjacent to the project site during the site visits. Although they could not be identified, they appeared to be small salmonids. The Lake Washington system, including the LCR adjacent to the project site, hosts many fish species, including five salmonid species: Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), coho salmon (O. kisutch), sockeye/kokanee salmon (O. nerka), coastal cutthroat trout (O. clarki clarki), and steelhead/rainbow trout (O. mykiss). Anadromous forms of each of these species use the Cedar River system as migratory, forage, nursery, and spawning habitat, so individuals are present in the river both as adults during migrations to spawning grounds and as juveniles (Kerwin, 2001). All of these species occur Amec Foster Wheeler Project No. LY15160360 11 p:\boeing renton\ly15160360 apron d permitting\reports\streamstudynarrative\aprond_streamstudyhabitatrpt_060115.docx seasonally in the LCR adjacent to the project site. Additionally, there have been isolated reports of coastal/Puget Sound bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) occurring in the Lake Washington system; however, it is believed that few bull trout occur in the Lake Washington system, if they occur at all. Puget Sound Chinook salmon, Puget Sound steelhead trout, and bull trout are federally-listed species under the Endangered Species Act. Nonanadromous forms of winter steelhead (rainbow trout), sockeye (kokanee), and cutthroat trout may also occur in the LCR. Resident rainbow trout spend their entire life in the Lake Washington system. The resident rainbow trout population was sustained with hatchery plants because they rarely successfully reproduce in Water Resource Inventory Area 8; however, releases of hatchery rainbow trout have been all but eliminated. Nonanadromous coastal cutthroat trout also occur in the Lake Washington system and are much more abundant than the anadromous form. Kokanee salmon is the freshwater, resident form of O. nerka. Some progeny from the parents of anadromous sockeye may also remain in Lake Washington for all or a portion of their lives (resident/anadromous sockeye) (Kerwin, 2001). The largest single population of adfluvial bull trout in western Washington is found above Cedar Falls in the upper Cedar River watershed. It is believed that a small number of bull trout pass through the reservoir and downstream hydroelectric facilities to the river reaches below Cedar Falls. However, it is apparently not sufficient to support the establishment of bull trout populations under the current ecological conditions (Corps, 2002). Native char, presumably bull trout, have been observed in the fish ladder viewing pool at the Hiram M. Chittenden Locks as recently as 1997, while isolated reports of native char being caught in or around Lake Washington occur every few years. A large juvenile char, again, presumably a bull trout (~250 millimeter, 3 year old), was caught in the LCR in July 1998. An adult char was also caught in the LCR in April of 1993 (Corps, 2002). Based on this information, occurrence of bull trout in the LCR adjacent to the project site is expected to be extremely limited, if they occur at all. Fish exclusion surveys conducted by Amec Foster Wheeler biologists in June 2013 and June 2014 as part of Boeing’s North Bridge Replacement project on the LCR identified juvenile Chinook and coho salmon, as well as juvenile steelhead/rainbow trout. Other fish species identified during these surveys included slimy sculpin (Cottus asper), three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus), and ammocoetes of an unidentified lamprey species (Petromyzontidae). Amec Foster Wheeler 12 Project No. LY15160360 p:\boeing renton\ly15160360 apron d permitting\reports\streamstudynarrative\aprond_streamstudyhabitatrpt_060115.docx Species endemic to the Lake Washington system include the northern pike minnow (Ptychocheilus oregonensis), peamouth (Mylocheilus caurinus), sculpins (Cottus spp.), and longfin smelt (Spirinchus thaleichthys) (Weitkamp et al., 2000; Wydoski and Whitney, 2003). Twenty-four non-native fish species (Table 3) have been identified in the Lake Washington/Lake Union system. A number of these species are now believed to be no longer present in the system. Some of these species are known to prey on juvenile salmon (e.g., smallmouth bass) while others are potential competitors with juvenile salmonids for food (Kerwin, 2001). 2.5 MEASURES TO PROTECT TREES AND VEGETATION The proposed project will not occur in areas with existing trees or riparian vegetation. No direct or indirect impacts to riparian vegetation or trees will occur as a result of the proposed project; therefore, no measures to protect vegetation or trees have been incorporated into the work plan. 2.6 NO NET LOSS OF ECOLOGICAL FUNCTION The project will result in no net loss of ecological function in the riparian zone of the LCR adjacent to and 100 feet upstream and downstream of the project site. As described above, the LCR adjacent to the project site provides limited ecological function due to low habitat diversity and complexity. Amec Foster Wheeler Project No. LY15160360 13 p:\boeing renton\ly15160360 apron d permitting\reports\streamstudynarrative\aprond_streamstudyhabitatrpt_060115.docx 3.0 HABITAT DATA REPORT The habitat data report, as required by the City of Renton and described in RMC 4-8-120C, will provide pertinent habitat and ecological function information for the immediate project site where the proposed project is to occur. Sections 3.1 through 3.6 of the report will discuss following: The layers, diversity and variety of habitat found on the site; The location of any migration or movement corridors; The species typically associated with the cover types, including an identification of any critical wildlife species that might be expected to be found; Identification of any areas that have been previously disturbed or degraded by human activity or natural processes; A summary of existing habitat functions and values; and A summary of proposed habitat alterations and impacts and proposed habitat management program. 3.1 HABITAT DIVERSITY The LCR downstream of I-405 (approximately 1.6 miles) is an artificial channel created early in the 20th century and is completely constrained between levees and revetments. This reach was regularly dredged to prevent flooding from the time of its completion in 1912 until the mid-1970s. Portions of the reach were again dredged in 1999 for the first time since the mid-1970s. Flood-control dredging is proposed during the summer of 2015. In-stream habitat in the reach is almost entirely glide, with little habitat complexity. Land uses prevent floodplain connectivity and have eliminated the potential for re-connection with a natural floodplain or the establishment of a riparian corridor. Channelization and existing land uses also prevent significant large woody debris (LWD) from accumulating in the channel. The reach is also very low-gradient and depositional, and the substrates have high levels of fine sediments (Corps, 2004; Parametrix and Adolfson, 2010). The shoreline along the LCR adjacent to the project site consists of developed property belonging to Boeing and the City of Renton. With realignment of the Cedar River into Lake Washington in 1912, the zone of sediment deposition was localized through the City of Renton (Perkins, 1994). The vast majority, if not all, of the non- suspendable sediment load is now deposited along this reach because Lake Washington lies at the river’s mouth. With the path of the river fixed by armored banks, progressive infilling of the channel resulted. Sediment is continually deposited in the downstream 2 miles of the river and in an enlarging delta in Lake Washington. Amec Foster Wheeler 14 Project No. LY15160360 p:\boeing renton\ly15160360 apron d permitting\reports\streamstudynarrative\aprond_streamstudyhabitatrpt_060115.docx Aquatic habitat within the LCR adjacent to the project site consists of a low relief benthic habitat composed of small cobbles with some gravel and no boulders. LWD in the stretch of the LCR adjacent to the project site is extremely limited (Appendix B, Photo 1). River discharge at the time of the site visits in May and November 2014 was approximately 1,000 cubic feet per second and 320 cubic feet per second during the May 2015 visit (USGS, 2015). Channelization of the LCR has eliminated meanders within the lower river, such that the lower 1.6 miles of river consists of a uniform glide habitat with a nearly complete absence of riffles and pools. Habitat diversity along the LCR adjacent to the project site is extremely limited. 3.2 MIGRATION CORRIDORS A query of the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife’s Priority Habitat and Species database (http://wdfw.wa.gov/mapping/phs/) identified five salmonid species that use the LCR as a migration corridor: Chinook salmon; Coho salmon; Sockeye salmon; Steelhead and rainbow trout; and Coastal cutthroat trout. Two of the above species, Puget Sound Chinook salmon and Puget Sound steelhead trout, are listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. Bull trout, a member of the char family, may also be found in the LCR and is also listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. Population status information and extent of use of this area is currently unknown. Adult and subadult size individuals have been observed infrequently in the LCR (below Cedar Falls), Lake Washington, and at the Locks. No spawning activity or juvenile rearing has been observed and no distinct spawning populations are known to exist in Lake Washington outside of the upper Cedar River above Lake Chester Morse (not accessible to bull trout within Lake Washington) (NOAA-Fisheries and USFWS, 2008). It is unlikely that bull trout use the Cedar River as a migratory corridor. 3.3 SPECIES AND COVER TYPES The almost complete absence of riparian vegetation along the west bank of the LCR and the limited riparian vegetation along the east bank adjacent to the project site and the highly developed shorelines along both banks of the LCR severely limit habitat availability and use by multiple plant and Amec Foster Wheeler Project No. LY15160360 15 p:\boeing renton\ly15160360 apron d permitting\reports\streamstudynarrative\aprond_streamstudyhabitatrpt_060115.docx animal species. The concrete flood-control wall on the west bank of the LCR adjacent to the project site severely limits the width of the riparian zone and eliminates the transition zone from riparian to terrestrial habitats. Typical plant and animal assemblages and associations that would be expected along the riparian corridor of the LCR are, for the most part, absent along the stretch adjacent to the project site. A query of the Washington Department of Natural Resources’ Natural Heritage Program online database (http://www.dnr.wa.gov/ResearchScience/HowTo/ConservationRestoration/Pages/ amp_nh_data_order.aspx) did not identify any plant or terrestrial animal species of special concern in the vicinity of the project site. Critical wildlife species occurring at the project site include those salmonids identified in Section 2.4.4 above. 3.4 IDENTIFICATION OF DISTURBED AREAS The entire project area is highly developed and disturbed. As stated in Section 3.1, the lower 1.6 miles of the LCR is an artificially-created channel with extensive development along both banks. 3.5 EXISTING HABITAT VALUES AND FUNCTIONS The LCR adjacent to the project site has very limited habitat value and is low functioning. A combination of two habitat assessment methods was used to provide a qualitative assessment of the existing habitat values and functions. These habitat assessment methods were the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Wadeable Streams and Rivers (Barbour et al., 1999) and the U.S. Forest Service’s Stream Inventory Handbook: Levels I and II (USFS, 2010). Both methods incorporate the use of physicochemical and biological parameters to assess habitat value and functionality. The EPA’s Rapid Bioassessment Protocols incorporates both benthic invertebrate and fish assemblages’ data in evaluating habitat value and function. For the purposes of this project, neither benthic invertebrate nor fish assemblage data were collected as part of the evaluation process due to the necessity of applying for and receiving the necessary permits to gather such data. The habitat assessment is based on physicochemical conditions observed at the project site: Temperature, Water quality, Reach sinuosity, Amec Foster Wheeler 16 Project No. LY15160360 p:\boeing renton\ly15160360 apron d permitting\reports\streamstudynarrative\aprond_streamstudyhabitatrpt_060115.docx Vegetative conditions of the stream banks and the riparian zone, and Condition of the floodplain (e.g., accessibility from the bank, overflow, and size). Each of the above parameters is discussed below. 3.5.1 Temperature Mean monthly water temperatures in degrees Celsius in the LCR at Renton for the period of February 1992 through January 2015 (USGS, 2015) are as follows: January – 6.0 February – 6.3 March – 7.5 April – 9.4 May – 11.5 June – 13.2 July – 15.6 August – 15.9 September – 13.7 October – 11.0 November – 8.1 December – 6.3 The warmest water temperatures occur during the months of June, July, August, and September; however, even the highest mean monthly temperatures are compliant with Washington State aquatic life temperature criteria (Table 4), with the exception of the char spawning and rearing beneficial use. Char (e.g., bull trout) do not spawn in the LCR and it is highly unlikely that they use the LCR as rearing habitat. 3.5.2 Water Quality No site-specific water quality data were found for the project site; however, water quality monitoring has been conducted in south Lake Washington by the Washington State Department of Ecology. Washington State’s Water Quality Assessment (303[d] & 305[b] Report) (Ecology, 2008) identified exceedances of water quality standards for temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, and fecal coliforms in the LCR. No chemical exceedances of state water quality criteria were identified for the LCR adjacent to the project site. 3.5.3 Reach Sinuosity As discussed above, the lower 1.6 miles of the LCR are channelized and much of the shoreline on both banks is restrained by bulkheads. There is no sinuosity within the entire 1.6 miles of the LCR. Stream sinuosity can provide increased habitat complexity through the creation of pools, riffles, and glides, as well as the creation of off-channel habitat. Amec Foster Wheeler Project No. LY15160360 17 p:\boeing renton\ly15160360 apron d permitting\reports\streamstudynarrative\aprond_streamstudyhabitatrpt_060115.docx 3.5.4 Vegetative Conditions As described previously, riparian vegetation is sparse along the both banks of the LCR within 100 feet of the project site. As such, habitat diversity and functionality along this reach of the LCR is severely limited. 3.5.5 Floodplain Condition The LCR is an artificially-created channel confined by levees and bulkheads on each bank. Except in extreme discharge conditions, the LCR has very little connectivity with its floodplain and virtually no potential for formation of off-channel habitat within the floodplain. Because of the low gradient of the LCR, it functions as a sediment depositional zone. The City of Renton and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers periodically dredges the LCR for flood-control purposes. The City of Renton is proposing flood-control dredging for the summer of 2016. 3.5.6 Habitat Values and Functions at the Project Site A qualitative assessment of the LCR adjacent to the project site indicates that it provides very low habitat value and function due primarily to the sparse riparian vegetation and habitat complexity. 3.6 HABITAT ALTERATIONS AND IMPACTS AND PROPOSED HABITAT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM The project will not involve any in-water components or work below the OHWM, nor will any portion of the project occur in the riparian zone of the LCR. The one component of the project that could potentially affect aquatic biota in the LCR is light impingement from the additional lighting proposed for the new crew shelter and guardhouse. Amber-hued LED lights will be used for both the crew shelter and guardhouse. Specifications for the proposed LED lights are provided in Appendix A. Boeing conducted a light impingement study to assess potential alterations to existing lighting conditions on the LCR attributable to the proposed project (Appendix C). Current lighting conditions were field verified, and a simulated lighting model created to reflect the existing conditions. Figures 9 and 10 show the modeled existing lighting conditions (in foot-candles) along the east and west shorelines of the LCR adjacent to the proposed project site. Field data for the modeling were collected on the evening of May 17 between 2330 and 0030. Sky conditions were partly cloudy with no visible moon present, and a temperature of 60 degrees Fahrenheit. Sampled foot-candle levels on the east and west banks of the LCR were less than 0.10 foot-candles. Existing 400-watt pole-mounted high- pressure sodium fixtures are the primary contributor to existing lighting conditions. The model was then updated with the proposed amber-hued LED fixtures installed, with results showing discernible change to the existing foot-candle levels on the LCR (Figures 11 and 12). Therefore, the proposed project will have no effect on existing light conditions on or near the LCR. Amec Foster Wheeler 18 Project No. LY15160360 p:\boeing renton\ly15160360 apron d permitting\reports\streamstudynarrative\aprond_streamstudyhabitatrpt_060115.docx No other components of the proposed project occurring in the 200-foot shoreline zone will affect existing habitat or ecological conditions within the 200-foot shoreline zone or within the adjacent LCR. No habitat management or mitigation programs are required for proposed project and none are proposed. Amec Foster Wheeler Project No. LY15160360 19 p:\boeing renton\ly15160360 apron d permitting\reports\streamstudynarrative\aprond_streamstudyhabitatrpt_060115.docx 4.0 REFERENCES Barbour, M.T., J. Gerritsen, B.C. Snyder, and J.B. Stribling. 1999. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, EPA 841-B-99-002, Washington, D.C. Corps – see U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Kerwin, J. 2001. Salmon and Steelhead Habitat Limiting Factors Report for the Cedar-Sammamish Basin (Water Resource Inventory Area 8). Washington Conservation Commission, Olympia. King County. 2008. King County Biodiversity Report 2008. King County, Seattle, Washington, http://www.kingcounty.gov/environment/animalsAndPlants/biodiversity/king-county- biodiversity-report.aspx (accessed September 1, 2009). National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (NOAA-Fisheries and USFWS). 2008. Endangered Species Act – Section 7 Consultation Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Consultation. The I-405 Tukwila to Renton Improvement Project (I-5 to SR 169 – Phase 2) Lower Cedar River, Cedar River Sixth Field HUC: 171100120106, 171100120302, King County, Washington. NOAA-Fisheries and USFWS, Lacey, Washington, https://pcts.nmfs.noaa.gov/pls/pcts-pub/sxn7.pcts_ upload.download?p_file=F13441/200704219_405_trip_03-03-2008.pdf (accessed May 19, 2012). Parametrix and Adolfson Associates, Inc. (Parametrix and Adolfson). 2010. City of Renton Shoreline Master Program Update Restoration Plan. Prepared for the City of Renton, Washington, http://rentonwa.gov/uploadedFiles/Business/EDNSP/planning/ 4.3%20Final%20Restoration%20Plan%20(june-10).pdf?n=2474 (accessed April 13, 2012). Perkins, S.J. 1994. The shrinking Cedar River – Channel changes following flow regime regulation and bank armoring, in Proceedings of Effects of Human-Induced Changes on Hydrologic Systems. American Water Resources Association 1994 Annual Summer Symposium, p. 649-658. Richter, K.O., and Azous, A.L. 1997. Amphibian distribution, abundance, and habitat use, in Azous, A.L., and Horner, R.R. (eds.), Wetlands and Urbanization – Implications for the Future, final report. Puget Sound Wetlands and Stormwater Management Research Program, Washington State Department of Ecology, Olympia, King County Water and Land Resources Division, Seattle, Washington, and University of Washington, Seattle, http://your.kingcounty.gov/dnrp/ library/archive-documents/wlr/wetlands-urbanization-report/wet-rept.pdf (accessed September 1, 2009). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps). 2002. Montlake Cut Slope Stabilization Project Environmental Assessment Biological Evaluation – Lake Washington Ship Canal, Seattle, Washington. Corps, Seattle District, Seattle, Washington. Amec Foster Wheeler 20 Project No. LY15160360 p:\boeing renton\ly15160360 apron d permitting\reports\streamstudynarrative\aprond_streamstudyhabitatrpt_060115.docx ———. 2004. Cedar River at Renton Flood Damage Reduction Operation and Maintenance Manual – Cedar River Section 205 (Renton, Washington). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District, Seattle, Washington. U.S. Forest Service (USFS). 2010. Stream Inventory Handbook: Levels I and II (Version 2.10). USFS, Pacific Northwest Region, Region 6, Portland, Oregon. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2015. USGS Surface-Water Monthly Statistics for Washington – USGS 12119000 Cedar River at Renton. Department of the Interior, USGS, National Water Information System, http://nwis.waterdata.usgs.gov/wa/nwis/monthly/ ?site_no=12119000&por_12119000_18=1179603,00010,18,1992-02,2015-01&start_dt=1992- 02&end_dt=2015-01&format=html_table&date_format=YYYY-MM- DD&rdb_compression=file&submitted_form=parameter_selection_list (accessed May 18, 2015). Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology). 2008. Washington State’s 2008 Water Quality Assessment (303[d] & 305[b] Report). Ecology, Olympia, http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/ wq/303d/2008/index.html (accessed April 15, 2012). Weitkamp, D.E., Ruggerone, G.T., Sacha, L., Howell, J., and Bachen, B. 2000. Factors Affecting Chinook Populations – Background Report. City of Seattle, Seattle, Washington. Wydoski, R.S., and Whitney, R.R. 2003. Inland Fishes of Washington. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland, and University of Washington Press, Seattle. TABLES p:\boeing renton\ly15160360 apron d permitting\reports\streamstudynarrative\tables\tables_aprons_a&d_060115.docx Amec Foster Wheeler Page 1 TABLE 1 SMALL MAMMALS REPORTED TO OCCUR ALONG THE LOWER CEDAR RIVER¹ Boeing Aprons A and D New Crew Shelter and Guardhouse Project Renton, Washington Species Common Name and Scientific Name (Genus species) Creeping vole Microtus oregoni Montane shrew Sorex monticolus Deer mouse Peromyscus maniculatus Shrew-mole Neurotrichus gibbsii Ermine Mustela ermine Southern red-backed vole Clethryonomys gapperi Forest deer mouse Peromyscus oreas Townsend’s chipmunk Tamias townsendii Long-tailed vole Microtus longicaudus Trowbridge’s shrew Sorex trowbridgei Marsh shrew Sorex bendirei Vagrant shrew Sorex vagrans Masked shrew Sorex cinereus Note(s) 1. Source: Richter and Azous, 1997. Amec Foster Wheeler Page 2 p:\boeing renton\ly15160360 apron d permitting\reports\streamstudynarrative\tables\tables_aprons_a&d_060115.docx TABLE 2 BIRDS REPORTED TO OCCUR ALONG THE LOWER CEDAR RIVER1 Boeing Aprons A and D New Crew Shelter and Guardhouse Project Renton, Washington Species Common Name and Scientific Name (Genus species) American crow Corvus brachyrhynchos Northern pygmy owl Glaucidium gnoma American goldfinch Carduelis tristis Orange-crowned warbler Vermivora celata American robin Turdus migratorius Pine siskin Carduelis pinus Black-capped chickadee Parus atricapillus Pacific-slope flycatcher Empidonax difficilis Belted kingfisher Ceryle alcyon Purple finch Carpodacus purpureus Bewick’s wren Thryomanes bewickii Red-breasted nuthatch Sitta Canadensis Brown-headed cow bird Molothrus ater Red-breasted sapsucker Sphyrapicus ruber Black-headed grosbeak Pheucticus melanocephalus Red crossbill Loxia curvirostra Brewer’s blackbird Euphagus cyanocephalus Red-eyed vireo Vireo olivaceus Brown creeper Certhia Americana Rufous-sided towhee Pipilo erythrophthalmus Black-throated gray warbler Dendroica nigrescens Ruffed grouse Bonasa umbellus Bushtit Psaltriparus minimus Ruby-crowned kinglet Regulus calendula Chestnut-backed chickadee Parus rufescens Red-winged blackbird Agelaius phoeniceus Cedar waxwing Bombycilla cedrorum Sora Porzana Carolina Cooper’s hawk Accipiter cooperii Song sparrow Melospiza melodia Common raven Corvus corax Sharp-shinned hawk Accipiter striatus Common yellow throat Geothlypis trichas Steller’s jay Cyanocitta stelleri Dark-eyed junco Junco hyemalis Swainson’s thrush Catharus ustulatus Downy woodpecker Picoides pubescens Townsend’s warbler Setophaga townsendi European starling Sturnus vulgaris Vaux’s swift Chaetura vauxi Evening grosbeak Coccothraustes vespertinus Violet-green swallow Tachycineta thalassina Fox sparrow Passerella iliaca Virginia rail Rallus limicola Great blue heron Ardea herodias Warbling vireo Vireo gilvus Golden-crowned kinglet Regulus satrapa Western tanager Piranga ludoviciana Hairy woodpecker Picoides villosus Willow flycatcher Empidonax traillii Hermit thrush Catharus guttatus Wilson’s warbler Cardellina pusilla Marsh wren Cistothorus palustris Winter wren Troglodytes hiemalis MacGillivray’s warbler Geothlypis tolmiei Wood duck Aix sponsa Northern flicker Colaptes auratus Yellow warbler Dendroica petechia Note(s) 1. Source: Richter and Azous, 1997. p:\boeing renton\ly15160360 apron d permitting\reports\streamstudynarrative\tables\tables_aprons_a&d_060115.docx Amec Foster Wheeler Page 3 TABLE 3 NON-NATIVE FISH SPECIES INTRODUCED INTO THE LAKE WASHINGTON/LAKE UNION SYSTEM¹ Boeing Aprons A and D New Crew Shelter and Guardhouse Project Renton, Washington Common Name Scientific Name Status American shad Alosa sapidissima Uncommon strays Atlantic salmon Salmo salar Can exceed 1,000 per year Black bullhead Ictalurus melas Extinct Black crappie Pomoxis nigromaculatus Common Bluegill Lepomis macrocheilus Common Brook trout Salvelinus fontinalis Rarely caught Brown bullhead Ictalurus nebulosus Rare, may be extinct Brown trout Salmo trutta No observed reproduction Channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus Rarely caught Cherry salmon Oncorhynchus masou Extinct Common carp Cyprinus carpio Abundant Fathead minnow Pimephales notatus Unknown Goldfish Carassius auratus Intermittent Grass carp Ctenopharengodon idella Triploids only Lake trout Salvelinus namaycush Extinct Lake whitefish Coregonus clupeaformis Extinct Largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides Common Pumpkinseed sunfish Lepomis gibbosus Abundant Smallmouth bass Micropterus dolomieui Common Tench Tinca tinca Abundant Warmouth Lepomis gulosus No observed reproduction Weather loach Misgurnus angillicaudatus No observed reproduction White crappie Pomoxis annularis Uncommon Yellow perch Perca flavescens Abundant Note(s) 1. Source: Kerwin, 2001. Amec Foster Wheeler Page 4 p:\boeing renton\ly15160360 apron d permitting\reports\streamstudynarrative\tables\tables_aprons_a&d_060115.docx TABLE 4 DIFFERENT AQUATIC LIFE USES AND THEIR ASSOCIATED NUMERIC TEMPERATURE CRITERIA¹ Boeing Aprons A and D New Crew Shelter and Guardhouse Project Renton, Washington Beneficial Use Temperature2 (ºC) Char Spawning and Rearing 12 Core Summer Salmonid Habitat 16 Salmonid Spawning, Rearing, and Migration 17.5 Salmonid Rearing and Migration only 17.5 Note(s) 1. Source: Ecology, 2012. 2. Based on the 7-day average of the daily maximum temperatures. Abbreviation(s) ºC = degrees Celsius FIGURES LY15160360VICINITY MAP Date 05/18/15 Project # LY15160360 Figure 1 Boeing Aprons A and D New Crew Shelter and Guardhouse Project Renton, Washington By: RES LY15160360OVERALL ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLANDate 05/18/15Project # LY15160360Figure 2Boeing Aprons A and D New Crew Shelter and Guardhouse ProjectRenton, WashingtonBy: RES LY15160360AERIAL PHOTO OF APRONS A AND D PROJECT SITESDate 05/20/15Project # LY15160360Figure 3Boeing Aprons A and D New Crew Shelter and Guardhouse ProjectBy: RES LY15160360APRON A SITE PLANDate 05/18/15Project # LY15160360Figure 4Boeing Aprons A and D New Crew Shelter and Guardhouse ProjectRenton, WashingtonBy: RES LY15160360APRON A CREW SHELTER PLAN VIEWDate 05/18/15Project # LY15160360Figure 5Boeing Aprons A and D New Crew Shelter and Guardhouse ProjectRenton, WashingtonBy: RES LY15160360APRON A CREW SHELTER EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSDate 05/18/15Project # LY15160360Figure 6Boeing Aprons A and D New Crew Shelter and Guardhouse ProjectRenton, WashingtonBy: RES LY15160360APRON D SITE PLANDate 05/18/15Project # LY15160360Figure 7Boeing Aprons A and D New Crew Shelter and Guardhouse ProjectRenton, WashingtonBy: RES200-ft ShorelineSetback100-ft ShorelineSetback LY15160360Plan ViewDate: 05/2715By: RESProject # LY15160360Figure 8APRON D GUARDHOUSE PLAN VIEW AND EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSBoeing Aprons A and D New Crew Shelter and Guardhouse ProjectRenton, Washington Lighting Levels Expressed as Foot-candlesLY15160360East Shoreline North of BridgeEast Shoreline South of BridgeDate: 05/2715By: RESProject # LY15160360Figure 9LIGHT IMPINGEMENT STUDY ‐EXISTING CONDITIONS ON EAST SHORELINEBoeing Aprons A and D New Crew Shelter and Guardhouse ProjectRenton, WashingtonLower Cedar RiverLower Cedar River Lighting Levels Expressed as Foot-candlesLY15160360West Shoreline North of BridgeWest Shoreline South of BridgeDate: 05/2715By: RESProject # LY15160360Figure 10LIGHT IMPINGEMENT STUDY ‐EXISTING CONDITIONS ON WEST SHORELINEBoeing Aprons A and D New Crew Shelter and Guardhouse ProjectRenton, WashingtonLower Cedar RiverLower Cedar River Lighting Levels Expressed as Foot-candlesLY15160360East Shoreline North of BridgeEast Shoreline South of BridgeDate: 05/2715By: RESProject # LY15160360Figure 11LIGHT IMPINGEMENT STUDY ‐PROPOSED CONDITIONS ON EAST SHORELINEBoeing Aprons A and D New Crew Shelter and Guardhouse ProjectRenton, WashingtonLower Cedar RiverLower Cedar River Lighting Levels Expressed as Foot-candlesLY15160360West Shoreline North of BridgeWest Shoreline South of BridgeDate: 05/2715By: RESProject # LY15160360Figure 12LIGHT IMPINGEMENT STUDY ‐PROPOSED CONDITIONS ON WEST SHORELINEBoeing Aprons A and D New Crew Shelter and Guardhouse ProjectLower Cedar RiverLower Cedar River APPENDIX A Lighting Specifications ORDERING INFORMATION ORDERING EXAMPLE: LNC-9LU-5K-3-1-PC1 SERIES LNC LNC zero uplight NUMBER OF LEDS/SOURCE/VOLTAGE 5LU 5 LEDs, Universal voltage 120-277V 7LU 7 LEDs, Universal voltage 120-277V 9LU3 9 LEDs, Universal voltage 120-277V CCT 3K 3000K nominal, 70 CRI 4K3 4000K nominal, 70 CRI 5K3 5000K nominal AM2 Amber (590 μm available for “Turtle Friendly”/ observatory appli- cations, 350 mA (consult factory) IES DISTRIBUTION 2 Type II 33 Type III 43 Type IV OPTIONS PC(X)1 Button photocontrol, replace X with voltage, specify 1-120V, 2-208V, 3-240V, 4-277V LNC FINISH 1 Bronze 2 Black 3 Gray 4 White 5 Platinum LNC SERIES A B C D 4.81” 1.55” 8.22” 5.25” (122 mm) (39 mm) (209 mm) (133 mm) Intended Use: The compact LED LNC is designed for entry/pe- rimeter illumination for safety, security and identity. Typical mounting height is up to 12 feet with 40ft fixture spacing (without acrylic diffuser) and 30ft spacing with acrylic diffuser installed. Photocontrol option is available to provide dusk-to-dawn control for additional energy savings. Construction: Decorative die-cast aluminum housing and door. Rugged design protects internal components and provides excellent thermal management for long life – 60,000 hours minimum LED life at L96 rating per IESNA TM-21-11. Powder paint finishes provide lasting appearance in outdoor environments. Optics/Electrical LED: Drivers are 120-277V, 50/60Hz Type II, III and Type IV lenses provide wide lateral spread. 0-10V dimming 120-277V only. • LNC5L – 5 LEDs, 12.9w, .11 amp max, 980 lumens, Type II, III or IV • LNC7L – 7 LEDs, 16.6w, .14 amp max, 1441 lumens, Type II, III or IV • LNC9L – 9 LEDs, 22w, .18 amp max, 1806 lumens, Type II, III or IV • 3000K - 80 CRI, 4000K - 70 CRI, and 5000K - 67 CRI, CCT nominal • Minimum operating temperature is -40˚C/-40˚F • Drivers have greater than .90 power factor and less than 20% Total Harmonic Distortion Lenses: Full cut-off distribution; Ambient diffuser included, use for applications near enterances or locations where reduced brightness is desired. Installation: Quick mount adapter provides quick installation, designed for recessed box 4” square junction box. Listings: Listed and labeled to UL 1598 for wet locations, 25˚ C ambient environments. Some models meet DesignLights Consortium (DLC) qualifications, consult DLC website for more details: http://www.designlights.org/QPL • IES Progress Award Winner - 2012 Warranty: Five year limited warranty (for more information visit: http://www.hubbelloutdoor.com/resources/ warranty/ B C D A LNC-5L LNC-7L LNC-9L With diffuser 1 When PC is ordered, input must match PC voltage 2 Amber LEDs only available on 7LU and 9LU configurations, 350 mA only 3 DesignLights Consortium (DLC) qualified 5/7/9 models 4K and 5K only LED Product Partner CERTIFICATIONS/LISTINGS DIMENSIONS PRODUCT IMAGE(S)SPECIFICATIONS Hubbell Outdoor Lighting • 701 Millennium Boulevard • Greenville, SC 29607 • Phone: 864-678-1000 Due to our continued efforts to improve our products, product specifications are subject to change without notice. © 2015 HUBBELL OUTDOOR LIGHTING, All Rights Reserved • For more information visit our website: www.hubbelloutdoor.com • Printed in USA LAREDOLNC-SPEC 3/15 Catalog Number G.W(kg)/ CTN Carton Dimensions Carton Qty. per Master PackLength Inch (cm) Width Inch (cm) Height Inch (cm) LNC-5LU 9.6 (4.36) 14.5 (37) 9.6 (24.5) 6.8 (17.5) 2 LNC-7LU 9.6 (4.36) 14.5 (37) 9.6 (24.5) 6.8 (17.5) 2 LNC-9LU 9.6 (4.36) 14.5 (37) 9.6 (24.5) 6.8 (17.5) 2 SHIPPING INFORMATION Cat.# Approvals Job Type xx3AM7LU PHOTOMETRICS LUMINAIRE AMBIENT TEMPERATURE FACTOR (LATF) ELECTRICAL DATA PROJECTED LUMEN MAINTENANCE AMBIENT TEMPERATURE LUMEN MULTIPLIER 0˚ C 32˚ F 1.02 10˚ C 50˚ F 1.01 20˚ C 68˚ F 1.00 25˚ C 77˚ F 1.00 30˚ C 86˚ F 1.00 40˚ C 104˚ F 0.99 50˚ C 122˚ F 0.98 Use these factors to determine relative lumen output for average ambient temperatures from 0-50°C (32-122°F). # OF LEDS DRIVE CURRENT (mA) DRIVE CURRENT (mA) INPUT VOLTAGE (V) CURRENT (Amps) SYSTEM POWER (w) 5 1 STD. (700mA) 120 0.11 12.9 277 0.05 12.9 7 1 STD. (700mA) 120 0.14 16.6 277 0.07 16.6 9 1 STD. (700mA) 120 0.17 22 277 0.09 22 PERFORMANCE DATA REPLACEMENT PART CATALOG NUMBER DESCRIPTION 93039574 Frosted comfort shield, improved uniformity with only 5% reduction Hubbell Outdoor Lighting • 701 Millennium Boulevard • Greenville, SC 29607 • Phone: 864-678-1000 Due to our continued efforts to improve our products, product specifications are subject to change without notice. © 2015 HUBBELL OUTDOOR LIGHTING, All Rights Reserved • For more information visit our website: www.hubbelloutdoor.com • Printed in USA LNC-SPEC 3/15 OPERATING HOURS Ambient Temp. 0 25,000 50,000 TM-21-111 L96 60,000 100,000 L70 (hours) 25°C / 77°F 1.00 0.98 0.97 0.96 0.95 >791,000 40°C / 104°F 0.99 0.98 0.96 0.96 0.94 >635,000 1. Projected per IESNA TM-21-11 * (Nichia 219B, 700mA, 85°C Ts, 10,000hrs) Data references the extrapolated performance projections for the LNC-12LU-5K base model in a 40°C ambient, based on 10,000 hours of LED testing per IESNA LM-80-08. 5K (5000K nominal, 67 CRI) 4K (4000K nominal, 70 CRI) 3K (3000K nominal, 70 CRI) AM (<580 nm wave-length) # OF LEDS DRIVE CURRENT SYSTEM WATTS DIST. TYPE LUMENS LPW 1 LUMENS LPW 1 LUMENS LPW 1 LUMENS SYSTEM WATTS LPW 1 5 STD. (700mA) 12.9W 2 982 76 926 72 743 58 3 967 75.5 920 71 712 55 4 980 76.5 900 70 725 56 7 16.6W 2 1402 82 1268 74 956 56 3 1389 80 1421 82 1046 59 268 6.6 59 4 1441 83 1428 82 1071 61 9 22W 2 1784 81 1748 79 1302 59 3 1745 80 1768 80 1310 59 4 1806 81 1771 80 1317 59.5 382 8.3 46 Lumen values are from photometric tests performed in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08. Data is considered to be representative of the configurations shown. Actual performance may differ as a result of end-user environment and application. Please consult IES files for BUG ratings. 10' 10' 10' 20' 30' 30' 10' 20' 20' .5fc 1fc 2fc 30'10' 10' 10' 20' 30' 30' 10' 20' 20' .5fc 1fc 30' 2fc 10' 10' 10' 20' 30' 30' 10' 20' 20'.5fc 1fc 30' 2fc LNC9LU - Type II LNC9LU - Type III LNC9LU - Type IV APPENDIX B Photographic Log APPENDIX B PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Boeing Aprons A and D New Crew Shelter and Guardhouse Project Renton, Washington Amec Foster Wheeler p:\boeing renton\ly15160360 apron d permitting\reports\streamstudynarrative\appendix b\aprond_photo_log_060115.docx B-1 Photo 1 Looking south from south bridge along west bank of lower Cedar River (LCR) Photo 2 Looking south from south bridge along west bank of LCR (note flood-control wall) APPENDIX B PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Boeing Aprons A and D New Crew Shelter and Guardhouse Project Renton, Washington Amec Foster Wheeler B-2 p:\boeing renton\ly15160360 apron d permitting\reports\streamstudynarrative\appendix b\aprond_photo_log_060115.docx Photo 3 West bank of LCR immediately south of south bridge Photo 4 Looking southwest from east bank of LCR at west bank APPENDIX B PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Boeing Aprons A and D New Crew Shelter and Guardhouse Project Renton, Washington Amec Foster Wheeler p:\boeing renton\ly15160360 apron d permitting\reports\streamstudynarrative\appendix b\aprond_photo_log_060115.docx B-3 Photo 5 Reed canarygrass (next to water) on west bank of LCR south of south bridge Photo 6 Japanese knotweed on west bank of LCR south of south bridge APPENDIX B PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Boeing Aprons A and D New Crew Shelter and Guardhouse Project Renton, Washington Amec Foster Wheeler B-4 p:\boeing renton\ly15160360 apron d permitting\reports\streamstudynarrative\appendix b\aprond_photo_log_060115.docx Photo 7 Horsetail on west bank of LCR south of south bridge Photo 8 Blackberry on west bank of LCR south of south bridge APPENDIX B PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Boeing Aprons A and D New Crew Shelter and Guardhouse Project Renton, Washington Amec Foster Wheeler p:\boeing renton\ly15160360 apron d permitting\reports\streamstudynarrative\appendix b\aprond_photo_log_060115.docx B-5 Photo 9 Looking west at patch of alder trees on west bank of LCR Photo 10 Looking at west bank of LCR north of south bridge APPENDIX B PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Boeing Aprons A and D New Crew Shelter and Guardhouse Project Renton, Washington Amec Foster Wheeler B-6 p:\boeing renton\ly15160360 apron d permitting\reports\streamstudynarrative\appendix b\aprond_photo_log_060115.docx Photo 11 Looking at west bank of LCR north of south bridge Photo 12 Looking south at south bridge from east bank of the LCR (note reed canarygrass) APPENDIX B PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Boeing Aprons A and D New Crew Shelter and Guardhouse Project Renton, Washington Amec Foster Wheeler p:\boeing renton\ly15160360 apron d permitting\reports\streamstudynarrative\appendix b\aprond_photo_log_060115.docx B-7 Photo 13 Looking south from bridge at east bank of the LCR (note alder trees at left center) Photo 14 Looking north from south bridge at east bank of LCR APPENDIX B PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Boeing Aprons A and D New Crew Shelter and Guardhouse Project Renton, Washington Amec Foster Wheeler B-8 p:\boeing renton\ly15160360 apron d permitting\reports\streamstudynarrative\appendix b\aprond_photo_log_060115.docx Photo 15 Looking north along east bank of LCR at Cedar River Trail Park north of bridge Photo 16 Looking north at east bank of LCR (blackberry and reed canarygrass in foreground) APPENDIX B PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Boeing Aprons A and D New Crew Shelter and Guardhouse Project Renton, Washington Amec Foster Wheeler p:\boeing renton\ly15160360 apron d permitting\reports\streamstudynarrative\appendix b\aprond_photo_log_060115.docx B-9 Photo 17 Vegetation along east bank of LCR north of bridge (reed canarygrass in center) Photo 18 Looking south toward south bridge at vegetation along east bank of LCR APPENDIX C Light Impingement Study f)i-CCCTh,CityofRentonLANDUSEPERMITMASTERAPPLiCATION—----------IPROPERTYOWNER(S)PROJECTINFORMATIONNAME:BoeingCorp.PROJECTORDEVELOPMENTNAMERentonApronA&DNewCrewShelter&GuardhouseADDRESS:737LoganAven.PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATIONANDZIPCITY:RentonZIP:737LoganAvenRentonWA98055:98055616WPerimeterRentoWA98055LeasedTELEPHONENUMBER:(206617-2944)KINGCOUNTYASSESSOR’SACCOUNTNUMBER(S):APPLICANT(ifotherthanowner)0723059001Boeing,0723059007LeasedNAME:MarkClement__________________________________________EXISTINGLANDUSE(S):ManufactoringCOMPANY(ifapplicable):BoeingADDRESS:P0box3707MS1W-09PROPOSEDLANDUSE(S):ManufactoringCITY:SEATTLEZIP:EXISTINGCOMPREHENSIVEPLANMAPDESIGNATION:98124UCNTELEPHONENUMBER206617-2944PROPOSEDCOMPREHENSIVEPLANMAPDESIGNATION________________________________________________________(ifapplicable):NACONTACTPERSONEXISTINGZONINGUrbanCenternorth2NAME:MarkClementPROPOSEDZONING(ifapplicable):sameasexistingCOMPANY(ifapplicable):BoeingCo.SITEAREA(insquarefeet):6,618,761sq.ft,leased-467,809SQUAREFOOTAGEOFPUBLICROADWAYSTOBEADDRESS:737LoganAven.DEDICATED:none_____ _ _ _ _ _ _SQUAREFOOTAGEOFPRIVATEACCESSEASEMENTS:CITY:RentonZIP:98055PROPOSEDRESIDENTIALDENSITYINUNITSPERNETTELEPHONENUMBERANDE-MAILADDRESS:206617-ACRE(ifapplicable):NA2944Mark.d.clement@boeing.comNUMBEROFPROPOSEDLOTS(ifapplicable):NAQ:\h/pw/devser/forrns/phinnIngIn1astcrapp.docI(16/OVi5 PRO]TINFORMATION(continue‘)NUMBEROFNEWDWELLINGUNITS(ifapplicable):NANUMBEROFEXISTINGDWELLINGUNITS(itapplicable):NASQUAREFOOTAGEOFPROPOSEDRESIDENTIALBUILDINGS(ifapplicable):SQUAREFOOTAGEOFEXISTINGRESIDENTIALBUILDINGSTOREMAIN(ifapplicable):NASQUAREFOOTAGEOFPROPOSEDNON-RESIDENTIAL_ _ __ __ _BUILDINGS(ifapplicable):360Cr.Shit.,Grd.Shk.80=440SQUAREFOOTAGEOFEXISTINGNON-RESIDENTIALBUILDINGSTOREMAIN(ifapplicable):NANETFLOORAREAOFNON-RESIDENTIALBUILDINGS(ifapplicable):NA________________________NUMBEROFEMPLOYEESTOBEEMPLOYEDBYTHENEWPROJECT(ifapplicable):NALEGALDESCRIPTIONOFPROPERTY(Attachlegaldescriptiononseparatesheetwiththefollowinginformationincluded)SITUATEINTHE_ne________QUARTEROFSECTION7_,TOWNSHIP_23n,RANGE_5e_,INTHECITYOFRENTON,KINGCOUNTY,WASHINGTON.TYPEOFAPPLICATION&FEESListalllanduseapplicationsbeingappliedfor:1.XShorelineexemption__ _ __ __ _3._ __ __ _2.4._ _ ____ _ _ _ ___ _Staffwillcalculateapplicablefeesandpostage:$BiIIedI,(PrintName/s)declarethatIam(pleasecheckone)thecurrentownerofthepropertyinvolvedinthisapplicationor-’j’theauthorizedrepresentativetoactforacorporation(pleaseattachproofofauthorization)andthattheforegoingstatementsandanswersherein.ontainedandtheinformationherewithareinallrespectstrueandcorrecttothebestofmyknowledgeandbelief.—i/4A7IcertifythatIknoworhavesatisfactoryevidencethat_Zt(ZI!I±LV—--signedthisinstrumentandacknowledgedittobehis/her/theirfreeandvoluntaryactfortheusesandpurposesmentionedintheinstrument.(SignatureofOwner/Representative)IiL_ _ ____—-MyAppointmentExpires:f.?17NotaryPublicinandfortheStateofWashingtonNotaryfl(Print)- - -PROJECTVALUE:$104,240ISTHESITELOCATEDINANYTYPEOFENVIRONMENTALLYCRITICALAREA,PLEASEINCLUDESQUAREFOOTAGE(ifapplicable):LiAQUIFERPROTECTIONAREAONELiAQUIFERPROTECTIONAREATWOLiFLOODHAZARDAREA__ _ __ _ _sq.ft.LiGEOLOGICHAZARD_ _ _ _ _ _sq.ft.uHABITATCONSERVATION_ __ _ __ _sq.ft.LiSHORELINESTREAMSANDLAKES116,000—sq.ft.LiWETLANDS_ __ _ __ _sq.ft.Q:weh/pw/devscrv/tbrms/planning/niasterappdoe(16/03/15 )ProjectnarrativeBOEINGCOMMERCIALAIRPLANEGROUPRENTONWASHINGTONRentonApronA&0NewCrewShelter&GuardhouseAspartoftheRentonplanttransitionfromthe737nextgenerationAircrafttothenewMAXprogram,BoeingisbringinginanewCrewshelter&relocatedguardshackonitsexistingapronstosupportflightcrewoperations.1)NewcrewshelteratAoron“A”616WPERIMETERRD98055Rentonairport(Leased)Parcelnumber07230590072)NewGuardhouseatAoron“D”3)737LoganavenuenorthRentonWA98055MainBoeingRentonManufacturingplantParcelnumber0723059001Masterusepermit/Shorelinepermit.ZoningdesignationisUrbanCenternorth2.TheAreaofworksizeis580Sqft.TheCedarRiver&LakeWashingtonaretheSpecialsitefeatures.Sandysiltloamisthesoiltype.DrainagetoLakeWashingtonisfromprivatestormwatersystemtomultipleoutfallstoLakeWashington.Noworkwillbedoneinthe100FtEnvironmentalCriticalAreaBufferzone. ))Accesstotheprojectis6THAvenueNorthNoproposedoff-siteimprovements,orlanddedicationsarepartofthescopeofthisproject.Totalestimatedconstructioncostandestimatedfairmarketvalueoftheproposedprojectis$104,240.Theexistingsiteis100%impervioussurfaceandnochangewillresultduetotheproject.NotreesorplantingsaretoberemovedordisturbedaspartofthisprojectContractorJobtrailerwillbelocatedonornearprojectsiteScopeofworkNewCrewShelteratApron“AInstallationofanew360sqft(12’x30’14’6”high)crewshelter.Newundergrounddataandelectricalutilitiestothecrewshelter:50Ifof¾”conduitforelectricalpathway(aboveground),50Ifof1”conduitfordatapathway(aboveground)and20Ifof2”conduitfordatapathway(belowground).Onenewexterioramberhueddirectionallight.CrewshelterwillhaveADAramp.Nonewparkingstalls,employeeswilluseexistingadjacentparkingAnticipateddatesofwork:9/9/2015—11/2015Natureoftheexistingshoreline:riverfront,channeledNewGuardhouseatADron“0TheprojectwillalsohaveanewsmallerguardhouserelocatedfromatemporarylocationandinstalledonApronD.*Theold10‘x12’guardhousewillberemovedduetoobstructionwiththewingsofthenewlarger737maxaircraftasittaxisthroughtheapron.Onenewexterioramberhueddirectionallightwillbeinstalled.*Thenewguardhouseis$osqft(8”x10“by8’6”high)withnewdataandelectricalutilities:Reroute20LFofexisting¾”conduitforelectricalpathwayattheguardshack.Thenetdecreasein*structuresis-40sqftduetothenewsmallerguardshackinApronDAnticipateddatesofwork:9/9/2015—11/20/2015Natureoftheexistingshoreline:riverfront,channeled IWashington—RentonNorth8thandLoganAvenueNorth,Renton,WA9805551FromSeattle52A53LAKEWASHINGTON5455FromBellevue404Medic&ChvOafetyBAIssaquahStCDAflRV5FromEnumclawTritonTowersThreeTritonTowersTwoFromCongacresPark*EmployeegatesAMSTurnstilegatesFencelinesWalkingtrailsBoeingpropertyGeneralparkingRestrictedparkingBusstopHelistopCafeteriainthebuilding55Fivisd0421155154rpynqh120151lwi1iqCompanyAl!nyhtsnserved ThCityof:1NOTICEOFAPPLICATIONAMasterApplicationhasbeenfiledandacceptedwiththeOepartmentofCommunity&EconomicDevelopment(CEO)—PlanningDivisionoftheCityofRenton.ThefollowingbrieflydescribestheapplicationandthenecessaryPublicApprovals.DATEOFNOTICEOFAPPLICATION:June17,2015PROJECTNAME/NUMBER:RentonApronA&D;NewCrewShelter&GuardHouse/LUA1S-000396,SMPROJECTDESCRIPTION:TheapplicantisrequestingaShorelineSubstantialDevelopmentPermitforanewcrewshelteratApronAandanewguardhouseatApron0.ApronAislocatedat616WPerimeterRd,attheRentonMunicipalAirportandApronDislocatedat737LoganAve.N,theBoeingPlantSite.BothsitearelocatedwithintheShorelineJurisdictionoftheCedarRiver,ReachA,designatedasShorelineHighIntensity.ApronDiszonedUC-N2andApronAiszonedIM.Theareaofworkwouldbe580SFandnoworkwouldoccurwithin100feetoftheOrdinaryHighWaterMark(OHWM)oftheCedarRiver.Thenewcrewshelterwouldbe360SFinsizeandtheguardhousewouldbe120SFinsizeforatotalof480SFonnewbuildings.Nonewimpervioussurfacewouldbeaddedtotheareaandnotreesand/orexistingvegetationwouldberemovedasaresultoftheproposedproject.TheapplicantprovidedaStreamStudy,HabitatDataReport,DrainageReportandaLightingImpingementStudywiththeapplication.PROJECTLOCATION:PERMITS/REVIEWREQUESTED:737LoganAveN&616WPerimeterRd.ShorelineSubstantialDevelopmentPermitAPPLICANT/PROJECTCONTACTPERSON:MarkClement/POBox3707MS1W-09/Seattle,WA98124/206-617-2944/Mark.d.clement@boeing.comCommentsontheaboveapplicationmustbesubmittedinwritingtoVanessaDolbee,CurrentPlanningManager,DepartmentofCommunity&EconomicDevelopment,1055SouthGradyWay,Renton,WA980S7,by5:00p.m.onJuly1,2015.Ifyouhavequestionsaboutthisproposal,orwishtobemadeapartyofrecordandreceiveadditionalnotificationbymail,contacttheProjectManageratt425)430-7314.Anyonewhosubmitswrittencommentswillautomaticallybecomeapartyofrecordandwillbenotifiedofanydecisiononthisproject.PLEASEINCLUDETHEPROJECTNUMBERWHENCALLINGFORPROPERFILEIDENTIFICATIONIDATEOFAPPLICATION:JUNE9,2015FileName/No.:RentonApronA&D;NewCrewShelter&GuardHouse/LUA5-000396,SMNAME:_________________________________________ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ _ _MAILINGADDRESS:City/State/Zip:NOTICEOFCOMPLETEAPPLICATION:JUNE17,2015Ifyouwouldliketobemadeapartyofrecordtoreceivefurtherinformationonthisproposedproject,completethisformandreturnto:CityofRenton,CED,PlanningDivision,1055SouthGradyWay,Renton,WA98057.TELEPHONENO.: