Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutExhibit 02_SEPA Checklist.pdf SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 1 of 13 SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of checklist: Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal. Instructions for applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use “not applicable” or "does not apply" only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown. You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision- making process. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Instructions for Lead Agencies: Please adjust the format of this template as needed. Additional information may be necessary to evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse impacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the applicable parts of sections A and B plus the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). Please completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proponent," and "affected geographic area," respectively. The lead agency may exclude (for non-projects) questions in Part B - Environmental Elements –that do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal. A. Background [HELP] 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Bazos Academy 2. Name of applicant: Bassetti Archtiects 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 2 of 13 71 COLUMBIA ST., #501 SEATTLE, WA 98104 SUSAN CONWAY, 206-340-9500 4. Date checklist prepared: 10/20/2021 5. Agency requesting checklist: City Of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Anticipate concurrent Temporary Use Permit and Building Permit review finished by end of November 2021, Nov 2021 – End of December 2021 for construction 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. There are no plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. There are no plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. There is none that we know of. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. City of Renton Temporary Use Permit, Building Permit. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) Interior renovation a portion of of existing 8,626 square foot building. Existing building is a Community Center, proposed use is a multi-classroom Educational/preschool center use. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 3000 NE 16TH STREET, RENTON WA 98056 B. Environmental Elements [HELP] 1. Earth [help] a. General description of the site: Flat (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other _____________ b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Approximatedly 2%. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 3 of 13 c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. The proposal will not result in removing of any soils. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. There are no indications or listing of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity. e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. There will not be any filling, excavation, or grading for this project. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No erosion would occur since there will be no exterior work. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? No change to the percentage of impervious surface from existing. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: N/A 2. Air [help] a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction, operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. There will be minimal emissions created during construction of the interior renovation. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. There are no known off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect the proposal. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: N/A 3. Water [help] a. Surface Water: [help] 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. There is no surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. N/A 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 4 of 13 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. N/A 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. According to FEMA Flood Map 53033C0668G, the proposed project is not within a 100-year flood plan. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. N/A b. Ground Water: [help] 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. N/A 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals. . . ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. N/A c. Water runoff (including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. N/A, No exterior work or change to existing conditions. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No wasted materials will enter ground or surface waters. 3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. The proposal does not alter or affect existing drainage patterns. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, if any: N/A SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 5 of 13 4. Plants [help] a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site: ____deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other __X_evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other ____shrubs __X_grass ____pasture ____crop or grain ____ Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops. ____ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other ____water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other ____other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? There will be no removal or alteration to any existing vegetation. c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. There are no threatened or endangered plan species on or near the project site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: There is no proposed landscaping work on the site. e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. There is no known noxious weeks or invasive species on or near the site. 5. Animals [help] a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. None. Examples include: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other ________ b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. According to the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) Mapping Services, there are no threatened or endangered animal species on our near the project site. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Yes, Renton is within the Pacific Flyway. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 6 of 13 d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: N/A e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. No Invasive animal species are known to be on the site. 6. Energy and Natural Resources [help] a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Existing electricity supply will be used for heating as required b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No, the proposal is not anticipated to affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: For HVAC, the condensing unit will be replaced with a more efficient model; dedicated ventilation units with heat recovery will be provided for classrooms. For Plumbing, low flow fixtures and a circulation pump on water heater will be provided. 7. Environmental Health [help] a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. There are no environmental health hazards anticipated from the project. 1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. Washington Department of Ecology “What’s in My Neighborhood” database shows no known contamination on or the project site. 2) No special emergency services will be required other than those normally provided such as police and fire protection. Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. There will be no toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or construction. 3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the project. There will be no toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or construction. 4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. No special emergency services will be required other than those normally provided such as police and fire protection. 5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: N/A SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 7 of 13 b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? There are no known off-site sources of noise that will impact this proposal. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term noise impact: typical of interior construction projects will occur with operation of equipment during construction. Long-term noise will be typical of that associated with a preschool center. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction noise only to occur during approved City ordinance hours and will be limited to the construction phase of the project. 8. Land and Shoreline Use [help] a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. The building’s current use is community center, and adjacent properties are residential. The proposal will not affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties. b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use? N/A 1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how: No. c. Describe any structures on the site. Existing 8,626 square foot building. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The Current zoning of the site is R-14 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Residential High Density based on City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map dated December 2018. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 8 of 13 g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify. None. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Around 70 during typical daycare operation hours, including up to 60 students and up to 10 staff members. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? No people will be displaced by the proposal. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A L. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposed project will comply with local and state codes and guidelines. Submittal to be reviewed by the City of Renton for Temporary Use and Building Permit. m. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any: N/A 9. Housing [help] a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, mid- dle, or low-income housing. The proposal does not include housing. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. The proposal does not include eliminating housing units. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics [help] a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 25' at the tallest part of roof of the existing building. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? No Change eill tbe done to the exterior. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 9 of 13 b. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: N/A 11. Light and Glare [help] a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No light or glare from the finished project that will pose a safety hazard or interior with views. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? No off-site sources of light or glare are expected to impact the proposal. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: N/A 12. Recreation [help] a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? There is Honey Dew Creek Trail about 1mile to the north and McKnight Middle School’s sports fields about 1 mile to the south. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No recreational opportunities would be displaced. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N/A 13. Historic and cultural preservation [help] a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers ? If so, specifically describe. The existing building is built in 1942, but there are no buildings or structures on or near the site list in or eligible for preservation. b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. The DAHP WISAARD did not identify evidence of Indian or historic landmarks, features, or occupation on or within the vicinity of project site. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 10 of 13 c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. The proposal utilized the Washington Information System for Architectural and Archaeological Records Data (WISAARD) online database to assess potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on and near the proposal. d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. No disturbance to cultural or historical resources is expected. 14. Transportation [help] a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is bounded by NE 16th St on the south side and Kirkland Ave NE on the west. No additional access to the existing street system is proposed. b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? There are 2 bus stops on NE 16th St right and Kirkland Ave NE right on the south side of the project site. c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non-project proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? No change to existing parking spaces. d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The proposal will not require any new or improvements to existing roads. e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. The proposal will not use water, rail, or air transportation. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and nonpassenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? Per traffic engineer’s report, the number daily trip generated by the proposal and the remain portion of the community center is 252, similar to that of the original community center use. Traffic estimates were developed using rates and equationg for elementary school, since hours of operation and trip patterns best match this use. A large portion of students are expected to arrive and depart with guardians on foot or by transit. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 11 of 13 g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. No. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: N/A 15. Public Services [help] a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. The project will supplement public services by providing a preschool facility for the residents in the surrounding neighborhood. 16. Utilities [help] a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other ___________ c. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. No additional utilities are being proposed for the project. C. Signature [HELP] The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: ___________________________________________________ Name of signee __________________________________________________ Position and Agency/Organization ____________________________________ Date Submitted: _____________ D. Supplemental sheet for nonproject actions [HELP] (IT IS NOT NECESSARY to use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 12 of 13 When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; pro- duction, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? It is unlikely that the proposal will increase discharge of water, emisisions to air,release of toxic substancae. Production of noise would be that of a typical preschool facility. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: N/A 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The proposal will not affect plants, animals, fish or marine life. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: N/A 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The proposal will be unlikely to deplete enerty or natural resources. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: N/A 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? The proposal will ne use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas desginedated for governmental protection. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: N/A 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The proposal is unlikely to affect land and shoreline use. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: N/A SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 13 of 13 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? From traffic engineer’s report, the proposal will general similar number of trips to that of the existing community center use; no increase demands on transpoartaion or public servies is anticipated. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: N/A 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The proposal will not conflict with local, state, or federal law or requirement sfor the protection of the environment.