HomeMy WebLinkAboutFinal Agenda PacketAGENDA
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
January 6, 2003
Monday, 7:30 p.m.
1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
3. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
4. AUDIENCE COMMENT (Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is
allowed five minutes. The comment period will be limited to one-half hour. The second audience
comment period later on in the agenda is unlimited in duration.)
When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer, please walk to the podium and state your name
and address for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST NAME.
5. CONSENT AGENDA
The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the
recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further
discussion if requested by a Councilmember.
a. Approval of Council meeting minutes of December 16, 2002. Council concur.
b. Approval of special Council meeting minutes of December 20, 2002. Council concur.
c. Court Case filed by New Image Neon, Inc., 6525 S. 194th St., Kent, 98032, requesting reversal
of the Board of Adjustment's decision denying a sign regulation variance (V-02-128) on
11/26/2002, for the construction of a freestanding pole sign for Billie's Casino located at 3650
East Valley Rd. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Services.
d. Development Services Division recommends approval, with conditions, of the Cobblestone Final
Plat; 66 lots for townhouses on 4.7 acres located in the vicinity of Union Ave. NE and NE 4th St.
(FP-02-073). Council concur. (See 8.a. for resolution.)
e. Development Services Division recommends approval, with conditions, of The Vineyards Final
Plat; 42 single-family lots on 7.32 acres located on Union Ave. NE between NE 5th and 6th
Streets (FP-02-123). Council concur. (See 8.b. for resolution.)
f. Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department submits proposed
amendments to the Center Office Residential (COR) 3 Zone to allow big -box retail, east of
Garden Ave. N. Refer to Planning & Development Committee and Planning_ Commission.
g. Human Resources & Risk Management Department requests review of how and when the City's
property and liability claims are reviewed. Refer to Finance Committee.
h. Human Resources & Risk Management Department recommends approval of modifications to
the City's healthcare plan effective l/1/2003 and submits Health Benefits Task Force
recommendations. Refer to Finance Committee.
i. Human Services Division requests authorization to hire the Community Development Block
Grant (CDBG) Specialist at Step E of the salary range. Refer to Finance Committee.
j. Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an agreement in the amount of
$53,504.46 with Entranco, Inc. for the design of the S. Grady Way and Rainier Ave. S. Pavement
Rehabilitation project. Refer to Transportation Committee.
k. Utility Systems Division submits CAG-02-106, Thunder Hills Sanitary Sewer Pipeline Access
Road Repairs; and recommends approval of the project, authorization for final pay estimate in
the amount of $652.80, commencement of 60-day lien period, and release of retained amount of
$9,373.55 to Boettcher and Sons, Inc., contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council
concur.
(CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE).
'd
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
January 6, 2003 Council Chambers
Monday, 7:30 p.m. MINUTES Renton City Hall
CALL TO ORDER Mayor Jesse Tanner led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the
meeting of the Renton City Council to order.
ROLL CALL OF KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER, Council President; TERRI BRIERE; KING
COUNCILMEMBERS PARKER; DON PERSSON; RANDY CORMAN; TONI NELSON; DAN
CLAWSON.
CITY STAFF IN JESSE TANNER, Mayor; JAY COVING TON, Chief Administrative Officer;
ATTENDANCE RUSSELL WILSON, Assistant City Attorney; BONNIE WALTON, City
Clerk; GREGG ZIMMERMAN, Planning/Building/Public Works
Administrator; NEIL WATTS, Development Services Director; ABDOUL
GAFOUR, Water Utility Supervisor; JASON JORDAN, Associate Planner;
JIM SHEPHERD, Community Services Administrator; KAREN BERGSVIK,
Human Services Manager; MIKE WEBBY, Human Resources Administrator;
ALEX PIETSCH, Acting Economic Development Administrator; DEREK
TODD, Assistant to the CAO; ACTING COMMANDER TIMOTHY
TROXEL, Police Department.
Council: Certificate of Council President Keolker-Wheeler presented a Certificate of Appreciation to
Appreciation to Toni Nelson, Toni Nelson in recognition of her outstanding service to the City and the
2002 Council President Renton community as President of the City Council during 2002.
ADMINISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative
REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work
programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2003 and beyond. Items noted
included:
The Renton Neighborhood Program will hold a Neighbor to Neighbor
networking meeting on Saturday, January 1 Ith, from 9:30 to 11:30 a.m. at
Fire Training Station #14. This is an opportunity for neighborhoods to
come and share their uniqueness and accomplishments; get acquainted with
other neighborhood organizations; and learn more about the Neighborhood
Program.
The windstorm on Friday, December 27th, did not cause much damage in
Renton. Some trees fell across streets and were quickly removed. The
largest problem was the loss of power in the north end, causing the West
Hill Reservoir and five sewer lift stations to be out of service. Wastewater
crews kept wet wells pumped down (using portable emergency generators)
to prevent back ups in the system.
AUDIENCE COMMENT Arland "Buzz" Johnson, 334 Wells Ave. S., #221, Renton, ,98055, reported that
Citizen Comment: Johnson - he was without electricity for six to seven hours during the recent power
Power Outage outage. Stating that he lives in Renton's business district, Mr. Johnson
expressed his concern regarding the inability of businesses to earn income
during power outages. Mr. Johnson recommended that a plan be developed to
protect the City from future power outages, especially in the business areas.
Mayor Tanner suggested that Mr. Johnson express his concerns directly to
City's power provider, Puget Sound Energy.
January 6, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 5
CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the
listing.
Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of December 16, 2002. Council concur.
December 16, 2002
Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of special Council meeting minutes of December 20, 2002. Council
December 20, 2002 concur.
Court Case: New Image Neon, Court Case (Summons and Petition for Review of Land Use Decision) filed in
CRT-03-001 King County Superior Court by New Image Neon, Inc., 6525 S. 194th St., Kent,
98032, requesting reversal of the Board of Adjustment's decision denying a sign
regulation variance (V-02-128) on 11/26/2002, for the construction of a
freestanding pole sign for Billie's Casino located at 3650 East Valley Rd. Refer
to City Attorney and Insurance Services.
Plat: Cobblestone, Union Ave Development Services Division recommended approval, with conditions, of the
NE, FP-02-073
Cobblestone Final Plat; 66 lots for townhouses on 4.7 acres located in the
vicinity of Union Ave. NE and NE 4th St. (FP-02-073). Council concur. (See
page 11 for resolution.)
Plat: The Vineyards, Union
Development Services Division recommended approval, with conditions, of
Ave NE, FP-02-123
The Vineyards Final Plat; 42 single-family lots on 7.32 acres located on Union
Ave. NE between NE 5th and 6th Streets (FP-02-123). Council concur. (See
page 11 for resolution.)
Planning: Center Office
Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department
Residential 3 Zone, Big -Box
submitted proposed amendments to the Center Office Residential (COR) 3
Retail
Zone to allow big -box retail east of Garden Ave. N. Refer to Planning_&
Development Committee and Planning Commission.
Human Resources: Property &
Human Resources and Risk Management Department requested discussion of
Liability Claims Review
how and when the Finance Committee wishes to review the City's property and
liability claims. Refer to Finance Committee.
Human Resources: Healthcare
Human Resources and Risk Management Department recommended approval
Plan Modifications
of modifications to the City's healthcare plan effective 1/1/2003 and submitted
Health Benefits Task Force recommendations. Refer to Finance Committee.
Human Services: CDBG Human Services Division requested authorization to hire the Community
Specialist Hire at Step E Development Block Grant (CDBG) Specialist at Step E of the salary range.
Refer to Finance Committee.
Transportation: S Grady
Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of an agreement in the
Way/Rainier Ave S Pavement
amount of $53,504.46 with Entranco, Inc. for the design of the S. Grady Way
Rehab Design, Entranco
and Rainier Ave. S. Pavement Rehabilitation project. Refer to Transportation
Committee.
CAG: 02-106, Thunder Hills
Utility Systems Division submitted CAG-02-106, Thunder Hills Sanitary Sewer
Sanitary Sewer Pipeline
Pipeline Access Road Repairs; and recommended approval of the project,
Access Road Repairs,
authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of $652.80, commencement
Boettcher and Sons
of 60-day lien period, and release of retained amount of $9,373.55 to Boettcher
and Sons, Inc., contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur.
Utility: Annual Consultant
Utility Systems Division requested approval of the annual roster of consultants
Roster
chosen to provide General Utility Engineering, Hydraulics/Hydrology,
Soils/Geotechnical, Geohydrology, Plan Review, Construction/Inspection, and
Corrosion Control services in 2003. Council concur.
January 6, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 6
Utility: Apollo Lift Station,
Wastewater Utility Division recommended approval of the transfer of
Transfer of Ownership to City
ownership of the Apollo Lift Station, located within Renton's service area on
the East Renton Plateau, from Water District 90 and Issaquah School District to
the City of Renton. Refer to Utilities Committee.
MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN,
COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED.
CARRIED.
OLD BUSINESS
Past Planning and Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a
Planning & Development
report regarding temporary signs obscuring neighborhood signs. The
Committee
Committee has received an update from the Development Services Division on
Development Services:
the issue of temporary real estate signs obscuring established neighborhood
Temporary Signs Obscuring
signs. The real estate directional signs, which were blocking the view of the
Neighborhood Signs
new Maplewood Glen neighborhood sign on Maple Valley Hwy., have been
moved as requested by staff. The Development Services Division has also
instituted an interim policy prohibiting future installation of permitted real
estate signs which obscure the view of public signs, including neighborhood
entry signs. Staff is working on proposed City Code changes for real estate
signs, and will report to the -Committee on recommended Code revisions at a
later date.
The Committee recommended that this item remain in Committee pending
further review and possible Code revisions to further address this issue.
MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL
CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
Development Services: Fence Past Planning and Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a
Height Regulations report regarding the maximum residential fence height regulations. The
Committee met to review and discuss potential revisions to the maximum
residential fence height regulations established in City Code Title IV
(Development Regulations).
Currently, City Code limits the height of residential fences to a maximum of
four feet when located adjacent to a public street. The Committee met in April
to discuss possible changes to the fence height regulations. The Committee
recommended that a public hearing be conducted, which occurred on May 6,
2002. Committee members subsequently toured several residential
neighborhoods in November and directed staff to address setback, landscaping
and fencing material requirements.
Staff has drafted revised fence standards, which would allow residents to apply
for a Special Administrative Fence Permit in order to construct six-foot high
fences when located within a front yard or side yard along a street setback. The
permits would be issued on a case -by -case basis provided the applicant
demonstrates the fence is constructed with appropriate fencing material; the
fence is sufficiently screened; and the finished side of the fence is oriented
toward the streetscape.*
At the request of Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler, Associate Planner Jason
Jordan provided a briefing on this matter. He explained that there are many
different types of fences, both conforming and non -conforming, throughout
Renton. He reviewed the current regulations, and stated that in their review of
the issue, the Planning and Development Committee considered privacy, safety,
fence treatment, and setbacks with and without landscaping. Mr. Jordan
concluded by saying that the recommendation is to change the residential fence
January 6, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 7
t-
height regulations, and allow the Development Services Division to approve
Special Administrative Fence Permits.
*MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN,
COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.*
Responding to Councilman Corman's concerns about sight distance safety, Ms.
Keolker-Wheeler emphasized that safety will be taken into account when each
individual situation is reviewed. Councilman Parker stressed that these changes
do not compromise any existing sight safety standards.
Responding to Councilwoman Nelson's inquiry regarding prior non -conforming
fences, Mr. Jordan stated that those with non -conforming fences can apply for
the Special Administrative Fence Permit.
In response to Councilman Clawson's question, Ms. Keolker-Wheeler
confirmed that the Committee reviewed existing sight distance standards. She
noted that the fence height standard can be changed only if it meets the criteria
as required by the Special Administrative Fence Permit.
*MOTION CARRIED.
Planning: Neighborhood & Past Planning and Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a
Business Design Standards report regarding neighborhood and business design standards. In a letter to the
City Council on August 14, 2001, former Planning Commissioner Rich Wagner
outlined issues for discussion in the future. The Committee recommended that
these issues be addressed as outlined below:
1) What does Renton want to be in 2020 and 2025?
This issue will be addressed during the 2003 Comprehensive Plan update.
2) Urban Design and Streetscape Design.
This issue will be addressed through the discussion of the community
design policies during the Comprehensive Plan update. The Economic
Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department has
developed a draft new element for the Comprehensive Plan that will
address Citywide design issues.
3) Downtown Pedestrian Frontages.
This issue will be addressed during the review of downtown policies and
the City Council gave direction to expand the length of the pedestrian
corridor. The issue will be taken up during the 2003 Title IV (Development
Regulations) docket review.
4) Automall Amenities Package.
This issue was to be a future phase of the Automall relying on private
investment based on public guidelines. The standards are adopted in City
Code. Additional phases will require a new work program.
5) Neighborhood Identify.
Several concepts have been suggested during the current Comprehensive
Plan amendment process that could lead to incentive programs for
reinforcing neighborhood identity. Renton's Neighborhood Program also
works with community groups to this end.
MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL
CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
January 6, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 8
Development Services: Past Planning and Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a
Architectural Projections in report regarding architectural projections in the setback area. The Committee
Setback Areas met to discuss the allowed projections into building setback areas in single
family residential zones. Current City Code language permits projections of up
to 24 inches in setback areas for certain types of architectural projections
including: eaves, cornices, uncovered porches, fireplaces, enclosed stair
landings, bay and garden windows, and similar structures as determined by the
zoning administrator.
Although the City Code language does not explicitly state in what situations the
standards are most appropriately applied, the existing language is suitably
general in its ability to address the multitude of housing designs that are
encountered during building plan review. Therefore, the Committee
recommended that the City Code provision remains as is, and that it continues
to be applied to single-family structures on a case -by -case basis. MOVED BY
KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN
THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
Planning: Development
Past Planning and Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a
Regulations (Title IV), Non-
report regarding the proposed 2002 City Code Title IV (Development
Substantive Amendments
Regulations) amendments. The Committee reviewed :the proposed Title IV
amendments and associated issue paper on December 19, 2002, and
recommended that the ordinance regarding this matter be presented for first
reading. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY BRIERE,
COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.*
In response to Councilman Clawson's inquiry whether section 15 of the
proposed ordinance changes the current appeal process, Assistant City Attorney
Wilson said he would investigate the matter.
*MOTION CARRIED. (See page 11 for ordinance.)
Development Services:
Past Planning and Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a
Enforcement of Mitigation
report regarding the enforcement of landscaping mitigation conditions for
Conditions (Landscaping) for
developments. Renton Municipal Code requires the installation of approved
Developments
landscaping on site before the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of
landscape improvements may be requested due to seasonal planting difficulties,
plant shortages, or when a project is impacted by a pending public works
project. The City Code does not specifically address enforcement of these
provisions.
Subsequent to bringing the item to the Committee for discussion, a docket
process has been initiated to review City Code issues such as this. The
Committee recommended that staff include the enforcement of landscape
conditions in the docket. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED
BY BRIERE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.
CARRIED.
Development Services: St. Past Planning and Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a
Anthony's Parish Development report regarding the St. Anthony's Parish development agreement. Pursuant to
Agreement Council's approval of the Whitworth Ave. S. street vacation for St. Anthony's
Parish (VAC-00-003), the execution and recording of a development agreement
was required in order to address issues presented in the July 15, 2002, Planning
and Development Committee report to the Council.
January 6, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 9
As required, St. Anthony's has prepared drafts of the document and in
coordination with the City Attorney and City staff, has arrived at a final form of
the proposed agreement. The Committee has reviewed the final draft of the
agreement and has determined the document appropriately addresses the issues
previously identified by the Committee
Therefore, the Committee recommended that the Council refer the item to staff
for processing the necessary State Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA)
review public hearing before the City Council, and for drafting the enacting
resolution. The Committee further recommended that a public hearing date of
February 10, 2003, be established.
The Committee also noted that the Zerbato family, adjacent property owners,
expressed special concerns during the Whitworth Ave. S. street vacation public
hearing on April 23, 2001. The Committee therefore recommended that staff
contact the Zerbato family to inform them of the draft development agreement,
and report back to the Committee on the results of this discussion. MOVED
BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY BRIERS, COUNCIL CONCUR
IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
Development Services: Land Past Planning and Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a
Use Development Processes report regarding the City's land use development processes. The Committee
discussed the various land use and building permit processes, and the length of
time that permits are valid. The Committee instructed staff to prepare a table
summarizing the City's permit processes, including information on the type of
permit, decision -making authority, period of validity, extension process, and
appeal of decisions. The table is to be updated annually for use by Council,
staff, and the public. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY
BRIERE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
Council: Outgoing Planning & A memo was read from former Planning and Development Committee Chair
Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler thanking Economic Development, Neighborhoods and
Comments (Keolker-Wheeler) Strategic Planning Department staff, City Attorney staff, Development Services
staff, and fellow Committee members for their hard work and dedication in
2002. She stated that it was a pleasure to work with a team of people who have
the best interests of the community in mind when making some very difficult
recommendations and decisions.
Finance Committee Finance Committee Chair Parker presented a report recommending approval of
Finance: Vouchers Claim Vouchers 210867 - 211361 and three wire transfers totaling
$2,676,651.77; and approval of Payroll Vouchers 41793 - 42205, two wire
transfers and 1131 direct deposits totaling $3,384,565.28. MOVED BY
PARKER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE
COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
Utilities Committee Past Utilities Committee Chair Briere presented a report recommending
Utility: Utility Fee Code concurrence in the staff recommendation that Council approve the proposed
Amendments utility fee amendments to Renton Municipal Code Section 4-1-180. The
Committee further recommended that the ordinance regarding this matter be
presented for first reading. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY
CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.
CARRIED. (See page 11 for ordinance.)
% January 6, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 10
Community Services
Community Services Committee Chair Nelson presented a report regarding
Committee
Matricula Consular as legal identification for Mexican citizens. Mexican
AJLS: Matricula Consular as
citizens living in the United States face problems obtaining services, licenses,
Legal Identification for
and employment without recognizable legal identification. Mexican nationals
Mexican Citizens Living in US
living in the United States without recognizable identification may be subject to
arrest and/or incarceration under this country's heightened security. Therefore,
as part of the national promotion by Mexico President Vicente Fox, the
Mexican Consulate of Seattle has requested that Renton consider recognizing
the Matricula Consular as official identification for Mexican citizens living in
the United States. The Committee reviewed the Administration's
recommendation for such recognition in the form of a resolution.
The Committee recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution
recognizing the Matricula Consular as legal identification for Mexican citizens
living in the United States. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY
CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.*
Councilman Clawson reported that New York City declined to accept this type
of identification due to law enforcement considerations, and inquired as to
whether the Committee discussed that particular aspect.
Councilwoman Nelson stated that police testimony was not received by the
Committee; however, she indicated that several cities and states recognize the
Matricula Consular as legal identification. She explained that this type of
identification, which is recognized throughout the country, can assist Mexican
citizens in obtaining various government and banking services while in the
United States.
Mayor Tanner added that the counterfeit -proof photo identification is issued by
the Mexican government through its Consular office, and identifies the person
as a citizen of Mexico. Councilman Clawson stated his agreement with the
action now that he understood that this is additional identification, and does not
take the place of any other type of identification.
*MOTION CARRIED. (See page 11 for resolution.)
Human Services: 2003 General Community Services Committee Chair Nelson presented a report
Fund Contingency Plan recommending concurrence with the staff recommendation that the revised
Revision 2003 General Fund Contingency Plan be distributed in accordance with the
Human Services Advisory Committee recommendations and conditions as
shown below.
Old Contingency Plan:
• Metropolitan Images/Renton Youth Day - $2,500; submit budget and
performance measures.
• Multi Service Center Energy Crisis Intervention Program - $5.,000.
TOTAL: $7,500
New Revised Contingency Plan:
• Metropolitan Images/Renton Youth Day - $2,500; submit budget and
performance measures to be approved by January 31, 2003.
• If Metropolitan Images/Renton Youth Day does not submit by January 31,
2003, the funds will be allocated to Way Back Inn.
• King County Sexual Assault Resource Center - $5,000.
.January 6, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 11
• Renton Area Youth Services - $9,000.
• Communities in Schools of Renton - $14,200.
TOTAL: $30,700
MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY PARKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN
THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. '
ORDINANCES AND
The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption:
RESOLUTIONS
Resolution#3610
A resolution was read approving the Cobblestone Final Plat consisting of
Plat: Cobblestone, Union Ave
approximately 4.7 acres located in the vicinity of NE 4th St. and Union Ave.
NE, FP-02-073
NE (FP-02-073). MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY
BRIERE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED.
Resolution #3611
A resolution was read approving The Vineyards Final Plat consisting of
Plat: The Vineyards, Union
approximately 7.32 acres located in the vicinity of Union Ave. NE and NE 6th
Ave NE, FP-02-123
St. (FP-02-123). MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY
BRIERE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED.
Resolution #3612
A resolution was read approving the Matricula Consular identification as legal
AJLS: Matricula Consular as
identification for Mexican citizens living in the United States. MOVED BY
Legal Identification for
NELSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADOPT THE
Mexican Citizens Living in US
RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED.
The following ordinances were presented for first reading and referred to the
Council meeting of 1/13/2003 for second and final reading:
Planning: Development
An ordinance was read amending Chapter 4-2, Land Use Districts, Chapter 4-4,
Regulations (Title IV), Non-
Property Development Standards, Chapter 4-6, Street & Utility Standards,
Substantive Amendments
Chapter 4-7, Subdivision Regulations, Chapter 4-8, Permits — General and
Appeals, Chapter 4-9, Permits — Specific, and Chapter 4-11, Definitions, of
Title IV (Development Regulations) of City Code to edit text references and
implement administrative determinations. MOVED BY KEOLKER-
WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL REFER THE
ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 1/13/2003.
CARRIED.
Utility: Utility Fee Code
An ordinance was read amending Section 4-1-180 of Chapter 1, Administration
Amendments
and Enforcement, and Section 4-3-050.P of Chapter 3, Environmental
Regulations and Special Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of
City Code by reorganizing the sections to make them consistent with the Title
IV format and to be more user-friendly. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED
BY CORMAN, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND
FINAL READING ON 1/13/2003. CARRIED.
NEW BUSINESS
MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL
Council: Meeting
CANCEL ITS REGULARLY SCHEDULED COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
Cancellations (1/20/2003,
AND COUNCIL MEETINGS SCHEDULED FOR JANUARY 20, 2003, IN
COW and Regular Meeting)
OBSERVANCE OF MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. DAY. CARRIED.
Citizen Comment: Alhadeff —
Council President Keolker-Wheeler reported receipt of a letter from Jack D.
Pavilion Building Lease
Alhadeff, JDA Group LLC, 95 S. Tobin St., Suite 201, Renton, 98055,
regarding securing a lease for the Pavilion Building. MOVED BY KEOLKER-
WHEELER, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL REFER THIS
CORRESPONDENCE TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. CARRIED.
January 6, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 12
ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADJOURN.
CARRIED. Time: 8:35 p.m.
'j.
BONNIE I. WALTON. City Clerk
Recorder: Michele Neumann
January 6, 2003
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDAR
Office of the City Clerk
COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING
January 6, 2003
COMMITTEE/CHAIRMAN DATE/TIME AGENDA
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MON., 01/13
(Keolker-Wheeler)
MON., 01/20
COMMUNITY SERVICES
(Nelson)
CANCELLED
No Meeting (Martin Luther King, Jr.
Day)
FINANCE MON., 01/13 Vouchers;
(Parker) 6:00 pm. Review of City's Property & Liability
Claims;
Modification to City's Healthcare Plan;
Community Development Block Grant
Specialist Hire at Step E
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
(Briere)
PUBLIC SAFETY
(Clawson) -
TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION)
(Persson)
UTILITIES
(Corman)
NOTE: Committee of the Whole meetings are held in the Council Chambers. All other committee meetings are held in the Council Conference Room
unless otherwise noted.
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
UBMITTING DATA:
Dept/Div/Board.. AJLS/City Clerk
Staff Contact... Bonnie Walton
SUBJECT:
CRT-03-001; Court Case — New Image Neon, Inc. vs
City of Renton
EXHIBITS:
Summons and Petition for Review of Land Use Decision
Al11 #: -
a,
R AGENDA OF: 0
AGENDA STATUS:
Consent ......... XX
Public Hearing..
Correspondence..
Ordinance...
Resolution...
Old Business.......
New Business......
Study Session....
Other....
RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPROVALS:
Legal Dept......
Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Services Finance Dept....
Other.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment..
Amount Budgeted ........ Revenue Generated...
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Summons and Petition for Review of Land Use Decision filed in King County Superior Court by
Warren Wissmer, Director of Sales for New Image Neon, Inc., 6525 S. 194th St., Kent, 98032, requesting
reversal of the Board of Adjustment's decision denying a sign regulation variance (V-02-128) on
November 26, 2002, for the construction of a 57 square foot, 20-foot high pole sign for Billie's Casino
located at 3650 East Valley Rd.
agendabl.doc/c
I
RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON
2 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 3: sSP M
3 DEC 2 3 2002 DEC 2 3 2002
RECEIVED
4 FQJT DEPARTMENT OF
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION
5
6
7 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
8 IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING
9 NEW IMAGE NEON, Inc., a Washington ) 02
corporation, ) ' 2 • c�
10 Petitioner, ) NO.
c�
e7 V77
11 vs. ) SUMMONS
12 CITY OF RENTON, )
13 Respondent. )
14
TO: THE CITY OF RENTON
15
TO THE RESPONDENT: A lawsuit has been started against you in the above -entitled court
16 New Image Neon, Inc., petitioner. Petitioner's claim is stated in the written Petition, a copy of
17 which is served upon you with this Summons.
18 In order to defend against this lawsuit, you must respond to the Petition by stating your defense
in writing, and serve a copy upon the undersigned attorney for the petitioners within twenty (20)
19 days after the service of this summons, excluding the day of service, if served within the State of
Washington, or within sixty (60) days after service of this summons if served outside the State of
20 Washington, or within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this Petition, or a
default judgment may be entered against you without notice. A default judgment is one where
21 petitioners are entitled to what they ask for because you have not responded. If you serve a
notice of appearance on the undersigned attorney, you are entitled to notice before a default
22 judgment may be entered.
23 You may demand that the petitioners file this lawsuit with the court. If you do so, the demand
must be in writing and must be served upon the plaintiffs. Within fourteen (14) days after you
24 serve the demand, the petitioners must file this lawsuit with the court, or the service on you of
25 this summons and petition will be void. Ad
SUMMONS - 1 (0 a
LA85130eadingslsununons.doc OPY
` } „
1
2
8
9
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
If you wish to seek the advice of an attorney in this matter, you should do so promptly so t
your written response, if any, may be served on time.
This, Summons is issued pursuant to Rule 4 of the Superior Court Civil Rules of the State
Washington.
Dated this �-3 day of December, 2002.
SUMMONS - 2
LA8513\PIeadings\summons.doc
NEW WGJ�XNEON, INC.
arren Wissmer, Director of Sales, Pro Se
1
2
3
4
5
M
7
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25 1
���,� INGTON
��1G
DEC 2 3 2NI
,NT 0EPARTMENT OF
JiJpoXL PDMINISTFATION
CITY OF RENTON
3: 5S5 P..m .
DEC 2 3 2002
RECEIVED
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING
NEW IMAGE NEON, Inc., a Washington
corporation,
Petitioner,
VS.
CITY OF RENTON,
Respondent.
®2®2®34519-1NT
NO.
PETITION FOR REVIEW OF LAND USE
DECISION
)
)
COMES NOW the petitioner, New Image Neon, and by way of Petition for Review
of Land Use Decision, petitions and alleges as follows.
I. INDENTIFICATION OF PARTIES
1.1 Identification of Petitioner: New Image Neon, Inc.
By: Warren Wissmer
Director of Sales
6525 South 194t' Street
Kent, WA 98032
1.2 Identification of Petitioner's Attorney: Petition appears pro se.
1.3 The name and address of the local jurisdiction whose land use decision is at issue:
The City of Renton
Planning/Building/Public Works Department
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
PETITION FOR REVIEW OF LAND USE DECISION - 1
LA851APleadings\Petition for review.doc C(PY
O
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
1.4 Identification of decision making body or officer, together with duplicate co;
decision: The name of the entity which made the decision being appealed is the Board
Adjustment of the City of Renton. Attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference
the Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Decision dated November 26, 2002 (attached hereto
Exhibit B).
1.5 Identification of each person to be made party under RCW 36.70C.040(2)(b
through (d): Bill and Soo An, 3122 Leeward Court NW, Olympia, WA 98502.
Mike Cohen C/O Steve Yester, MC Construction, PO Box 8478, Lacey
Washington 98509-8478.
II. STANDING
2.1 The petitioner is aggrieved and adversely affected by the land use decision an,
the petitioner is likely to be prejudiced by said decision. The petitioner's interests wer
considered by the local jurisdiction when making the decision, and a judgment in petitioner'
favor would eliminate or redress petitioner's prejudice caused by the land use decision. Th
petitioner has exhausted its administrative remedies. Last, the petitioner is the applicant to whi
the land use decision is directed. Thus, pursuant to RCW 36.70C.060, petitioner's have standi
to bring this land use petition.
III. STATEMENT OF ERRORS
3.1 The respondent engaged in unlawful procedure and failed to follow prescri
process.
3.2 The land use decision is a clearly erroneous application of the law to the facts.
3.3 The land use decision is not supported by the evidence that is substantial v
viewed in light of the whole record before the Court.
PETITION FOR REVIEW OF LAND USE DECISION - 2
LA85130eadings\Petition for review.doc
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
3.5 The land use decision violates the constitutional rights of the petitioner.
IV. STATEMENT OF FACTS
4.1 The errors claimed are that the subject: Billie's Casino Sign Variance (
Goldstream Casino) project No. LUA-02-128 V-B was wrongfully denied and we request
various to be approved based upon the findings of the facts.
4.2 The staff report dated November 26, 2002, (attached hereto as Exhibit A),
"Staff recommends approval of the requested variance from Section 4-4-100.E.5.a of the City
Renton Sign Regulations". It goes on further to state, "with no conditions".
4.3 The case for denial is opinionated and lacked the research the staff report put fo:
in support of the variance. It does not substantiate code reference or accurately researched t
position. For example, on Page Two, Paragraph Two of the Findings of Fact, Conclusion a
Decision, (attached hereto in as Exhibit B), "it appears their properties were developed prior
the sign regulations". This was the basis of denial that other properties had not been granted d
variance. However, if you refer to the City Clerk Card File, (attached hereto as Exhibit C),
clearly shows on Page 4 that the referenced property of Yonker Nissan did in fact apply for
sign permit and was approved dated March 14, 1997. As part of that approval there were r
conditions to remove their non -conforming pylon sign. Therefore, the subject property
examined by the staff does in fact warrant the same situation.
4.4 On Page 2, Paragraph 3 of the attached, (Exhibit B), it states the sign as, "gari
and not as plain as the Travelodge and Yonkers Nissan pole signs." Renton sign code does in
have design review. The use of the property in the zone is approved. It is the same artwork tl
is approved on other aspects of the property.
PETITION FOR REVIEW OF LAND USE DECISION - 3
LA851MI'leadings\Petition for review.doc
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
4.5 On Page 2, Paragraph 4 of (Exhibit B), it states "the subject property did not
any special circumstances that deprived them of rights and privileges enjoyed by other
owners in the vicinity." Yet, this is directly contradicted in Paragraph 10, "The
properties are not confronted with the same situation." Furthermore, in Paragraph 12 it
that, "the site is a self imposed hardship." This is a direct contradiction of Paragraph 10,
subject site is limited in its developable area due to the location of Panther Creek on its
portion and the required 25 foot OHWM buffer. Nearly one-third (1/3) of the site (24,000 sc
feet of the 76,000 square foot site) is retained as the critical area and buffer (Panther Creek).
remaining site accommodates the proposed building, parking, landscaping and other
improvements."
4.6 We have also submitted (Exhibit D), Environmental Review and
Land Use Action, which in summary establishes the layout of the development set for by
City of Renton. This report supports the staff report as set forth in (Exhibit A). This fact is al
pointed out of Page 3, Paragraph 4 of (Exhibit B), the southern portion of the site and a 25 fc
buffer (off limits to development/disturbance) was required as part of the project's site
approval."
4.7 After the Findings of Fact, Mr. George Feighner moved the motion for
of the proposed sign variance as set for in the staff report. The chairperson, Mr. Jay Wallace,
not initially oppose. Upon hesitation, Mr. Ralph Evans (resident) with no conclusive objects
of fact moved to oppose the motion and request denial. Given that only two of the
possible board members were present. The assumption was made that the chairperson in
could cast the deciding vote. Mr. Jay Wallace decided to deny the variance.
PETITION FOR REVIEW OF LAND USE DECISION - 4
LA85130eadingAPetition for review.doc
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25 1
4.8 It is our assertion that the staff report is accurate and that the motion to deny th,
variance should be reversed based on upon the findings of the facts, and motion put forth. I
should be in the hands of those requesting denial to put forth factual evidence to that positiol
rather than a whim of opinion due to an under -staffed situation.
4.9 We hereby respectfully request the variance to be granted as it was researched b}
the owners and staff of the City of Renton as part of this site development and successfu
business outline as granted to neighboring business premises.
V. RELIEF REQUESTED
WHEREFORE, the petitioner prays for the following relief.
5.1 For an order reversing the decision of the Planning/Building and Public Work
Department of the City of Renton; and/or
5.2 For an order remanding the decision for modification or further
and/or
5.3 For an order reversing the decision in requiring the City to approve
application of the petitioner; and/or
5.4 For such further orders as the Court deems necessary to preserve the interest
the parties and the public, pending further proceedings or actions by the City of Renton; and
5.5 For attorney's fees and costs provided by. statute; and
5.6 For any and all relief this Court deems equitable, legal and just.
Dated this n day of December, 2002.
NEW IMAG NFON, INC.
y� Z.
A"(
W issmer, Director of Sales, Pro Se
PETITION FOR REVIEW OF LAND USE DECISION - 5
LA85130eadingAPaition for review.doc
Fnd,��* CA)
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
STAFF REPORT
NOVEMBER 26, 2002
A. BACKGROUND
APPLICANT:
Michael Lee, New Image Neon
6525 South 194"' St. Kent, WA 98032
PROJECT NAME:
Billie's Casino Sign Variance (a.k.a. Goldstream Casino)
APPLICATION NO.:
LUA 02-128, V-B
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
The applicant is seeking a variance from the Sign
Regulations in order to construct a 57 square foot, 20
foot high pole sign at the west entry (East Valley Road)
of the parcel. A pole sign will be located at the east
boundary of the property abutting a limited access
roadway, SR167. The proposal would result in one
additional pole sign. RMC Section 4-4-100.E.5.a. allows
each individual business only one sign for each street
frontage.
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL:
3650 East Valley Road, Renton, WA 98055
L I • M C
�� O rna nouu � �sua wea
boarpt.doc
Billie's Casino Sign Variance (a.k.a. Goldstrearn .ino)
LUA 02-128, V-B
Page 3 of 4
2. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or
injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property
is situated:
The applicant believes the proposed freestanding sign would not adversely impact adjacent
property owners or be materially detrimental to the public welfare. The height of the sign would not
block views for surrounding businesses, it would be out of the clear vision triangle required for
vehicular access. In comparison, a monument type sign would tend to be more intrusive and could
potentially block the clear vision area as a monument sign would be on the ground and be of a
greater width and depth than an eight inch diameter pole. A monument sign would also require a
variance from the sign regulations. Additionally, the freestanding sign is not proposed to have
flashing or blinking lights.
3. That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation
upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is
situated:
The requested variance would allow for an additional freestanding pole sign on the west portion of
the site. The site is currently under development. Businesses in the vicinity, including Younker's
Nissan and the Travelodge, have freestanding signs in addition to wall signs. However, many of the
surrounding properties are developed with the building sited on the property such that the wall
signs are visible from East Valley Road which is dissimilar to the proposed Billie's Casino which is
sited at the east portion of the property (approximately 300 feet east of East Valley Road).
The subject site is limited in its developable area due to the location of Panther Creek on its south
portion and the required 25 foot OHWM buffer. Nearly 1/3`d of the site (24,000 square of the 76,000
square foot site) is retained as the critical area and buffer (Panther Creek). The remaining site
accommodates the proposed building, parking, landscaping and other site improvements. The
adjacent properties are not confronted with the same situation. Therefore, the site is limited to the
amount of developable land when compared to other properties in the vicinity.
4. That the approval as determined by the Board of Adjustment is a minimum variance that will
accomplish the desired purpose:
A card room with a restaurant is a permitted use in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zone and within
the Employment Area — Valley Comprehensive Land Use designation (south of 1-405). Sign
regulations and the street frontage definition prevents the "double" frontage site from having two
freestanding signs because direct access can only be obtained from East Valley Road as SR 167
is a limited access roadway. A casino is a use which typically is located in a highly visible,
accessible and active area. The permitted pole sign to be located at the east property boundary will
show the general location of the casino to potential patrons travelling north or south on SR167. The
proposed sign of this subject variance is needed to direct patrons to the property travelling on East
Valley Road. The building, the wall sign(s) and the SR167 pole sign would have limited, if any,
visibility from East Valley Road due to the building setback from the west property boundary. The
proposed sign complies with all other sign regulation criteria for setbacks, size (area) and height.
The feasibility of utilizing a different style of sign, such as a monument/ground sign (also would
require a variance) would not meet the intent of providing a highly visible sign for direction to the
site. The site does have the existing constraint of Panther Creek which runs along the southern
portion of the site and a 25 foot buffer (off limits to development/disturbance) was required as part
of the project's site plan approval. The limited amount of land area located at the East Valley Road
frontage is better suited to a pole sign. The proposal may be considered the minimum variance
necessary to accomplish the objective of the applicant to obtain maximum visibility.
boarptdoc
G3 - T23N R5E W 1/2
I L co SW 23rd Stt
IH! I IL
co
th Ist CA R
SW 27th Sty ," SW 27th St.
i ` I IM !' ---
��I
RC
SW 2 It St
i�
z =,`Oth St.
I H z
R I L 'I - �f if --' - .-C--- .._.
167
34th St I' +�
4 SW 3 th St. ��W 34,�th Str�
IL
I IIL I H - - Srra'
a
I C
IL w �,
SW'39th St. _ •-
ILI j
:
st St. I SW 41st t. ' A►
i
13 - 31 T23N R5E W 1/2
ZONING --
°® H3
�� ah uja ,:,°°°
p� MVICU4 Mtom 30 T23N R5E W 1/2
5330
g IE F8 oil
m
d
t s
'Cr =-7`CITY OF RIENTON
WL
t Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department
Jesse Tanner, Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator
December 2, 2002
CERTIFIED MAIL NO. 7000 1670 0009 3459 0478
Michael Lee
New Image Neon
6525 S. 194'r' St.
Kent, WA 98032
SUBJECT: Billie's Casino Sign Variance
Project No. LUA-02-128, V-B .
Dear Mr. Michaet Lee:
The Renton Board of Adjustment, at its regular meeting on November 26, 2002, denied your request for a
variance from City of Renton Munipal Code Section 4-4-100.E.5.a. of the Sign Regulations in order to
allow one additional freestanding pole sign:
Appeal Process. An Appeal of the Board's decision is governed .by Title IV, Chapter 36, Section I, which
rrquires that such appeal be filed with the Superior Court of Washington for King County within twenty
one (21) days from the date of issuance.of the decision. The date on which a Land use decision is issued
is considered to be three days after a written decision is mailed by the City. The Board of Adjustment
decision will become final on December 23 2002 if the decision is not appealed to Superior Court.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (425) 430-7382.
For the Renton Board of Adjustment,
we vz:z_,04�1
Susan Fiala
Project Manager
cc: Bill C. & Soo K. An/Owners
1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 R E 1V 1 O
kx V,6'?�>
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF RENTON
In Re: Billie's Casino Sign Variance (a.k.a. Goldstream Casino)
No. LUA-02-128,V-B
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION
FINDINGS OF FACT:
1. The applicant, Michael Lee of New Image Neon, is requesting approval of a variance from Section 4-4-
100.E.5.a. of the Sign Regulations in order to allow one additional freestanding pole sign.
2. The.proposal is for a 57 square foot (approximately 8 feet x 7 feet) sign to be mounted atop a 20 foot high,
8 inch diameter pole. The sign would be double sided (114 square feet total).
3. The subject site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning designation and the Employment Area -
Valley Comprehensive Land Use designation.
4. The subject property is currently being developed with a card room and restaurant building (casino) located
at the eastern edge of the property, approximately 300 feet from East Valley Road.
5. The subject property is permitted one sign located at the street frontage of East Valley Road (by definition
of street frontage) and wall signs.
6. The site is bounded on the east by SR167 and by East Valley Road to the west. There is no vehicular
access to SR 167 which is a limited access state highway. Access to the property is from East Valley Road.
The site is bounded on two sides by roads; however, the street frontage definition applicable to the sign
regulations states that a street frontage must provide direct access.
7. With the exception of the number of permitted freestanding signs based on street frontage, the proposed
sign complies with all other requirements of the City's Sign Regulations and the development standards of
the CA zone.
8. The sign code prohibits signage within the public right-of-way or 20 feet of the intersections or driveways
that obscures vision between the height of 3 to 10 feet of the street or driveway grade (a.k.a. "clear Vision
area"). The proposed sign location would not obscure or impair visibility within the clear vision area.
CONCLUSIONS:
FROM THESE FINDINGS OF FACT, THE BOARD MAKES THE FOLLOWING CONCLUSIONS:
Development Regulations Section 4-9-250.B.5. — The Board of Adjustment shall have authority to grant a variance
upon making a determination, in writing, that the conditions specified below have been found to exist:
1) That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special
circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or
:surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to
deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the
vicinity and under identical zone classification:
The subject property is currently being developed with a casino (card room and restaurant). The
rectangular shaped property has direct street access to East Valley Road on the west and fronts SR 167 on
the east (no direct access). The applicant contends that the location of the building inhibits the wall signs to
be adequately visible from East Valley Road. The applicant's intent is to provide for maximum visibility of
the business to potential patrons from SR167 and from East Valley Road. The location of the building on
site was sited for maximum visibility from SR167. However, the visibility of the building from East Valley
Billie's Sign Variance a.k.a. Goldstream Casino
LUA 02-128. V-B
Page 2 of 4
Road is curtailed due to the lack of a sign on the west property boundary. An additional sign would provide
direction for potential patrons accessing the casino from East Valley Road.
The applicant is allowed one freestanding sign per frontage; however, the site does front two roads but only
has direct access to East Valley Road. The applicant indicates that other businesses in the vicinity have
two freestanding pole stands, for example, Younkers Nissan. It appears that other businesses in the area
Z which have two freestanding signs were not reviewed under the board of adjustment process as it appears
.; Pj[=[.rop-►tes.,were, developed prior to the;slgn�feq-Vlpl ca s, and street frontage requirements as stipulated
in the current pity of Renton Development Regulations
The Board considered the proposed sign as garish and not as ."plain" as the Travelodge and Younkers
3 Nissan pole signs which contain one or two words and a two color palette. The subject sign would have
multiple colors, several lines of text and playing cards.
The Board indicated that the subject property did not have any special circumstances that deprived them of
rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity. The other properties who have
4, freestanding signs also have permitted wall signs. As stated per code, the site is allowed one sign per
street frontage and adherence to the code means that the permitted sign would be located at East Valley
Road. Staff indicated that code has been interpreted to allow the property owner to choose the location of
the one permitted frontage sign.
2) 5 That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious
to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated:
The applicant believes the proposed freestanding sign would not adversely impact adjacent property
owners or be materially detrimental to the public welfare. The height of the sign would not block views for
surrounding businesses, it would be out of the clear vision triangle required for vehicular access. In
comparison, a monument type sign would tend to be more intrusive and could potentially block the clear
visionarea as a monument sign would be on the ground and be of a greater width and depth than an eight
inch diameter pole. A monument sign would also require a variance from the sign regulations. Additionally,
the freestanding sign is not proposed to have flashing or blinking lights.
'The Board stated that the additional sign would not be detrimental to the public of injurious to the property
and can suppott the criteria jUstfication.
3) That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon
uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated:
The requested variance would allow for an additional freestanding. pole sign on the west portion of the site.
The site is currently under development. Businesses in the vicinity, including Younker's Nissan and the
Travelodge, have freestanding signs in addition to wall signs. However, many of the surrounding properties
are developed with the building sited on the property such that the wall signs are visible from East Valley
Road which is dissimilar to the proposed Billie's Casino which is sited at the east portion of the property
(approximately 300 feet east of East Valley Road).
The subject site is limited in its developable. area due to the location of Panther Creek on its south portion
and the required 25 foot OHWM buffer. Nearly 1/3rd of the site (24,000 square of the 76,000 square foot
lb site) is retained as the critical area and buffer (Panther Creek). The remaining site accommodates the
proposed building, parking, landscaping and other site improvements. The adjacent properties' are not
confionted with the same situation.
The Board considers the subject site similar to the adjacent properties that have the same rights to
construct several types of signs on their property as permitted by the Sign Regulations. They contend that
the permitted sign is to be located along East Valley Road.
The Board considers the additional sign a grant of a special privilege as the siting of the building to the
1 eastern portion of the site. is a self-imposed hardship. The other businesses in the vicinity that are located
Bilne's Sign Variance a.k.a. Goldstream Casino
LUA 02-128, V-B
Page 3 of 4
between East Valley Road and SR 167, with the exception of Younkem Nissan, have one freestanding sign
and other permitted signs such as wall signs and projecting roof signs.
4) That the approval as determined by the Board of Adjustment is a minimum variance that will
Z accomplish the desired purpose:
A card room with a restaurant is a permitted use in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zone and within the
Employment Area — Valley Comprehensive Land Use designation (south of 1-405). Sign regulations and the
street frontage definition prevents the "double" frontage site from having two freestanding signs because
direct access can only be obtained from East Valley Road as SR 167 is a limited access roadway. A casino
is a use which typically is located in a highly visible, accessible and active area. The permitted pole sign to
be located at the east property boundary will show the general location of the casino to potential patrons
travelling north or south on SR 167. The proposed sign of this subject variance is needed to direct patrons
to .the property travelling on East Valley Road. The building, the wall sign(s) and the SR167 pole sign would
have limited, if any, visibility from East Valley Road due to the building setback from the west property
boundary. The proposed sign complies with all other sign regulation criteria for setbacks, size (area) and
height.
The feasibility of utilizing a different style of sign, such as a monument/ground sign (also would require a
variance)` would not meet the intent of providing a highly visible sign for direction to the site. The site does
- have the existing,
constraint of Panther Creek which runs alon the southern portion of the site and a 25
foot buffercfrhttst5 developmefUdtsturbance) Was requlieas part o the profec's slte'pfah approval:
The limited amount of Land area located'a�-tfi'°e-Easfi Valley Road frontage is better suited to a pole sign.
rr The Board did not support the sign variance as a minimum variance and considered that other permitted
- signs;;would-accomplish the desired purpose of business :visibility and direction to the site:
DECISION:
FROM THE FOREGOING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS, THE BOARD ENTERS THE FOLLOWING
DECISION:
The variance is hereby denied from the City of Renton Development Regulations, Section 4-4-100.E.5.a., to allow
one additional freestanding pole sign along the site's street frontage (East Valley Road) as depicted in the.
submitted sign illustrations. The variance is denied.
DATED this 26th day of November, 2002..
An appeal of the Board of Adjustment decision is governed by Title IV, Chapter 36, Section I, whichrequires that
such appeal be filed with the Superior Court of Washington for King County within 21 days from the date of
- issuance of -the decision. The land use decision -is -considered issued three (3) days after a written decision is
mailed by the. City. The appeal period for this variance will end at 5:00 PM on December-23; 2002.
Jay al ce Ralp E ans
-7f(
George Feighner
Jim Jacques
Wayne Jones
Rentonnet City Clerk Card File
Page 1 of 1
Is( mw ~'Q
City cio;* Carld &Fffe
Record 1 of 1
Title: SA, YOUNKER NISSAN EXPANSION 93
Effective Date: Jan 1, 1993
Date Entered: Jan 26, 1994 by User: CC5
Date Modified: Aug 8, 2002 by User: slombard
Narrative: ■ 9/27/93 - Admin. Site Approval appl. for Younker Nissan Showroom expansion at
3820 East Valley Highway.
■ 10/27/93 - Determination of Non -Significance, Mitigated
Keywords: ■ KENNEY MICHELE 93
■ LUA-93-128 (SEE SA)
■ SA-93-128
■ V-93-128 (SEE SA)
■ YOUNKER NISSAN 93
■ E VALLEY HY 93
Location: MICROFILMED/OFFSITE
uests variance to project 15' into
exist-
constrveting a canopy over
3005 Sunset Boulevard
ie vicinity of
stated the coabany was in the Process
planned for
in•.age. Iwproveeents are
of the station and
eking the exterior
added es. Mr.at all but
the buildingsla
Ihave pume d canopiHe
interfere with
®.
trvcture would not
followed regarding a planting
,ion
.an traffic on the sidewalk from the
RENTON BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT,
RENTON B
station.
PUBLIC HEARING MEETIN
PUBLIC
NOVEMBER 18,.197
0ED BY HOLMAN. THAT SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES
WOULD BE
A G E N D A
A
y IN THAT THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE
THE AREA AND THAT THE BOARD GRANT
.
NGS IN THAT
WINHE PERMIT BE
G CONDITIAT ONS:
OF LANDSCAPED
)THE APRON OF THE
MEETING 068-70
MEETING 068-70
TEEN THE SIDEWALK AND
VOTE WITH HAM.111 DISSENTING.
ROLL CALL
1. CALL TO ORDER AND FLAG SALUTE
1.
CALL TO ORDER AND FLAG SALU'
2. ROLL CALL
2.
ROLL CALL
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (Minutes of the August 19th Meeting)
3.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES (Minute!
4. CORRESPONDENCE
4.
CORRESPONDENCE
THAT THERE BEING NO FURTHER
5. OLD BUSINESS -- _-.__
5.
OLD BUSINESS -------
)HDED BY HOLMfUI.
BOARD, THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED. MOTION
(a) Board of Adjustment By -Laws
(a) Board of Adjustmer
6. NEW BUSINESS -------
6.
NEW BUSINESS -------
(a) V-203-70 GLENN T. ROGGE requests variance to reduce the mini-
Am
(a) V-203-70 GLENN T.
M m width of thirteen (13) 5
width of thirteen (13) 90° parking stalls from 9' to 8-1/2'; also,
to reduce four (4) parallel parking stalls from
to reduce four (4) parallel
9' to 6' in width to
accommodate sport car parking; property located in the vicinity of 411
accommodate sport car parkin
Wells Avenue South, Renton,
4ar
Wells Avenue South, Renton.
mar e, ecre
sts aallarcdriance tunder
oversized roof sign70 Sin exAM cess Rof nummber ofe
(b) V-204-70 SAM YOUNK
Penton Board of Adjustment
signs the Sign
Code; property located in the vicinity of 3820 East
Code; Property located 10 th
Renton, Valley Highway,
Renton.
(c) V-20S-70 HOMELAND ASSOCIATES, INC. requests variance to allow
a pole sign to extend 2'6"
(c) V-205-70 HOMELAND
a pole sign tc extend 2'6" o
over sidewalk; property located in the
vicinity of 60S South Third Street, Renton,
vicinity of 605 South Third
(d) V-206-70 NOEL RICHARD WILKERSON requests variance to construct
an attached carport to within three feet (3') t,1s
(d) V-206-70 NOEL RICK
an attached carport to wlthi
of south property line;
property located in the vicinity of 812 Camas Avenue N.E., Renton,
property located in the vici
(e) I-207-70 TEXACO. INC. requests variance to project 15' into 20'
(e) V-207-70 TEXACO. Ii
required setback for the
required setback for the purpose of constructing a canopy over existing
puny island, property located 1n
purl
Pun9 island, property locate,
the vicinity of 3005 Sunset Bi
Renton, vd. N.E.,
Renton.
7. COMMENTS
7,
COMMENTS
-c-
S. ADJOURNMENT
B.
ADJOURNMENT
"11 A
City of Renton
Inspections List for Permit #S960019
Permit # S960019 Address: 3820
EAST VALLEY RD
Type SIGN
Applied:03/1511996 Issued: 03/22/1996
Finaled: 09116/1996
Sub -Type
Work Description INSTALL LETTERS ON AWNING FOR CAR DEALERSHIP
Status: FINALED
People List:
I FIVE SIGNS INC
CONTRACTOR (360) 75"053
LIVINGSTON, ROBYN
APPLICANT 206 459-3200
YOUNKER NISSAN
TENANT
YOUNKER SAM
OWNER
Item Inspection
Apvd Req
100 Final
Y R
03/1311997 APPR RA
APPROVED
Monday, December 09, 2002 9:18:37 A Page 1 of 1
REPORT_
City of Renton
8c
Department of Planning / Building / Public Works
DECISION
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW &
r.+►, ►
oz
s
ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION
REPORT DATE
May 7, 2002
Protect Name.
Goldstream Casino
ApprrcanL
Mike Cohen
(Contact: Steve Yester)
MC Construction
PO Box 8478
Lacey, WA 98509-8478
Bill and Soo An.
Owner
3122 Leeward Ct. NW
Olympia, WA 98502
Fie Number.
LUA-02-030, SA -A, ECF
Project Manager.
Susan A. Fiala, AICP
Project Descxipfion:
The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site
Plan Approval for the construction of a 7,159 square foot casino that includes a
restaurant, bar and gaming area. The casino is proposed to be a one-story stucco
structure with a high parapet roof.
Project Location:
3650 East Valley Road
Exist Bldg. Area SF:
N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area SF: 7,159 square feet
Site Area:
1.75 acres Total BuDding Area SF: 7,159 square feet
J
Project Location Map
sitercREPORT.doc
City of Renton P/R/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval & Environme. . Review Committee Staff
GOLDSTREAM CASINO LUA-02-030, SA
REPORT AND DECISION OF MAY 7, 2002 Page 2 of 11
PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND
The applicant, Mike Cohen, MC Construction, is requesting Administrative Site Plan Approval and Environmental
(SEPA) Review for the construction of a 7,159 square foot casino that would contain a restaurant, bar and gaming
area. The exterior construction materials would be primarily stucco and wood trim.
The project would be located on a 1.75 acre lot located between East Valley Road and SR167. The proposed casino
would be one story with a parapet roof and approximately 29 feet in height. The proposal includes 99 on -site parking
spaces in a 36,000 square foot parking lot with a pedestrian walk -way from the building entry to East Valley Road.
Vehicular access is via a single driveway fronting East Valley Road. Frontage improvements (e.g. sidewalk, curb and
gutter) along the East Valley Drive frontage currently exist. A concrete retaining wall is proposed to be constructed
along the entire north property line that would be less than four feet in height.
The site is undeveloped and covered with groundcover. Panther Creek runs along the southern portion of the site in a
narrow manmade channel. The flow of Panther Creek comes from a roadside ditch along SR167 to the east and then
goes through the site into a concrete culvert before leaving the site at the west end. The proposed building and parking
maintains the required 25 foot setback from the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) of the creek. This buffer area totals
about 30,000 sq. ft. or approximately 40% of the lot area which is to remain undeveloped. The existing trees located
within this 25 foot buffer are to remain undisturbed.
PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
In compliance with RCW 43.21 C.240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts
that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations.
A. Environmental Impacts
The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether
the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in
conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have
the following probable impacts:
(1) Earth
Impacts: The subject site is generally flat with little slope. A Soils Investigation Report prepared by Bradley -
Noble Geotechnical Services, dated March 1998, was submitted with the application. The report indicated that
two soil units were found in their explorations. There is a fill section that varies in thickness from six to ten feet
on the site. Underlying the fill section, the native soils which are organic silt and peats in the upper level
become more sandy with depth. Even at depth, there are layers of peat and fine organics. The native soils
become more dense with depth.
Earthwork activities for the proposal would involve fill of approximately 900 cubic yards of pit -run gravel as
structural base at building and pavement areas. Topsoil and fill dirt would also be brought in. The specific
source of import materials is not known at this time. Prior to bringing in fill, a 'source statemenC certified by a
professional licensed engineer would be required to be submitted for each source as stated in the
geotechnical report
In order to reduce the potential for erosion and control sedimentation during the clearing, grading, and
construction of the site, the applicant will be required to implement temporary erosion/sedimentation control
measures as required by RMC section 4-"30C.
The project area is in Seismic Zone 3 as shown by Figure 18-2, Seismic Zone Map of the United States, in the
1994 edition of the Uniform Building Code. The soils report indicates that the underlying soils are prone to
spontaneous liquefaction under major seismic loadings. The sediment thickness is 800 feet under the project
area and are well consolidated. The report recommends a soil coefficient type S3 be used for seismic design.
Mitigation Measures:
The applicant shall be required to adhere to the recommendations contained in the March, 1998 Soils
Investigation Report prepared by Bradley -Noble Geotechnical Services.
sitercREPORT.doc
City of Renton PAWW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval & Environme.. , Review Committee Staff Report
GOLDSTREAM CASINO LUA-02-030, SA A, ECF
AND DECISION OF MAY 7, 2002 Page 4 of 11
Mitigation Measures:
• The applicant shall install a wood split rail fence along the entire edge of the 25 foot creek buffer. The
patisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services
Division prior to the issuance of building permits for the project.
• The applicant shall locate and design all lighting located on the site (e.g. parking lot, signage and building),
to be focused and directed with appropriate methods (e.g. cut off shields, landscaping ) to prevent glare
and spillover lighting within the creek buffer. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the
review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits for the
project.
• The applicant shall be prohibited from using chemicals and fertilizers in the landscape area located on the
south side of the property adjacent to the creek buffer.
Policy Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations
(4) Transportation
Impacts: A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA), dated April 17, 2002, was prepared by Transportation Planning and
Engineering, Inc. The TIA was requested by Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) due to
the project's proximity to the SW 43rd Street Interchange of SR167. The TIA was forwarded to WSDOT upon
our receipt on April 23, 2002.
The Transportation Systems of the City of Renton conducted an initial review of the TIA and commented that
the proposed driveway location fronting East Valley Road is acceptable.
The proposal would result in an increase in traffic trips to the City's street system. Staff recommends a Traffic
Mitigation Fee be imposed on the project The Traffic Mitigation Fee is based on a rate of $75.00 per new
average daily trip generated by the project The fee is estimated at $38,175.00 ($75.00 x 509 trips =
$38,175.00). The fee.is payable at time of building permit issuance. _
Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per each
new average daily trip associated with the project prior to the issuance of building permits.
Policy Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations; Transportation Mitigation Fee Resolution No. 3100,
Ordinance 4527.
(5) Fire I Emergency Services
Impacts: The proposal would construct 7,159 square feet of new commercial area, which would potentially
impact the City's Fire Emergency Services. A Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $0.52 per square foot of
the building square footage would be required. The fee is estimated at $3,722.68 ($0.52 x 7,159 commercial
square feet = $3,722.68) and is payable prior to issuance of the building permits.
Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $0.52 per
square foot of building square footage. The fee is estimated at $3,722.68 ($0.52 x 7,159 square feet =
$3,722.68) and is payable prior to the issuance of building permits.
Policy Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations: Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution No. 2913, Ordinance 4527
B. Recommendation
Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials
make the following Environmental Determination:
DETERMINATION OF
NON -SIGNIFICANCE
Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period.
DETERMINATION OF
XX NON — SIGNIFlCANCE - MITIGATED
Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period.
XX
shercREPORT.doc
City of Renton PAWW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval & Environme. .l Review Committee Staff Report
GOLDSTREAM CASINO LUA-02-030, SA A, ECF •
--
REPORT AND DECISION OF MAY 7, 2002 Page 6 of 11
Plan Review — Water
1. The Water System Development Charge shall be $ 7,957.49. The rate is $0.154 x 51,672 square feet. This fee is
payable with the construction permit
2. A water' main extension is required to serve the site. It is shown on the plans.
3. A fire sprinkler system is required. A separate utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation
of the double detector check valve assembly to the fire sprinkler system. All devices installed shall be per the
latest Department of Health "Approved List" of Backflow Prevention Devices. Civil plans show location of device
and should note: "Separate plans and utility permit for DDCVA installation for Fire Sprinkler System will be
required%
4. For DDCVA installations inside the building, applicant shall submit a copy of the mechanical plan showing the
location and installation of the backflow assembly inside the mechanical room. Installation shall be in accordance
with the City of Renton's requirements. DDCVA shall be installed immediately after the pipe has passed through
the building floor slab. Installation of devices shall be in the horizontal position only.
5. Landscape irrigation systems will require a separate permit for the irrigation meter and approved backflow device
is requited to be installed. A plumbing permit will be required.
6. If the building exceeds 30 feet in height a backflow device will be required to be installed on domestic water
meter.
7. Preliminary fire flow is 1,500 gpm. Applicant must show the location of two hydrants required for this project. One
hydrant shall be within 150 feet and the other within 300 feet of the structure.
8. Existing hydrants to be counted as fire protection shall be retrofitted with a quick disconnect Storz fitting if not
already installed. Note on plan if required.
Plan Review — Sanitary Sewer
1. The Sewer System Development Charge shall be $ 5,477.23. The rate is $0.106 x 51,672 square feet. This fee is
payable with the construction permit
2. A sanitary sewer extension is required to serve the site. It has been shown on the plans.
3. If food preparation facilities are proposed, a grease trap or grease interceptor will be required. It is not apparent
on the plans provided.
Plan Review — Surface Water
1. The Surface Water System Development Charge shall be $ 7,994.90. The rate is $0.183 x 43,688 square feet.
This fee is payable with the construction permit
2. A drainage report has been submitted and reviewed. The drainage report appears to comply with WDFW request
to match the 2,10, and 100 year post -developed runoff peak rates to the pre -developed runoff peak rates with a
45% factor of safety for detention. Detention and water quality design shall be per the 1990 KCSWM. Preliminary
comments to be addressed in the final report are as follows:
a. Show conveyance calculations for all pipe systems.
b. As in the original report by Barghausen, a backwater analysis must be included for the outfall pipe from
the vault as well as the remaining storm system to determine if surcharging occurs.
c. The applicant shall use a tailwater elevation of 14.7 NGVD 29 (18.28 NAVD 88) which is based on the 2-
yr future condition flow in the Panther Creek Channel per the City hydraulic model. If surcharging does
occur in the parking area, the plans must delineate the area that will be flooded.
d. Provide full storm drainage plans and show profiles.
3. Structural plans shall be submitted for review and approval under a separate building permit for the storm
drainage vault Special inspection from the building department is required.
4. Applicant shall provide an erosion control plan at time of application. It has not been provided.
Plan Review - Transportation
1. The traffic mitigation fees will be assessed at $38,175.00. See attached Mitigation Fee Report This is payable at
time of building permit
2. A traffic study has been submitted for review. No additional street Improvements required.
3. On sheet A1.0, applicant had shown new sidewalk to be constructed on site. It is not clear why the unusual
design is shown as it is.
Plan Review — General
1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards
2. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to
City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer.
3. Separate permits for side sewers, water meters, landscape irrigation and any backflow devices are required.
When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate
and application fee shall be submitted at the sixth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use, but
sitercREPORT.doc
' City of Renton P/a PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval 8 Environme. .i Review Committee Staff Report
GOLDSTREAM CASINO LUA-02-030, SA -A, ECF
REPORT AND DECISION OF MAY 7, 2002 Page a or 11
2. Conformance with existing land use regulations;
The subject site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning designation. The purpose of the CA zone is
to provide suitable environments for "strip' commercial development. The CA zone provides for a wide variety
of retail sales and personal/professional services primarily oriented to automobile traffic along designated
major arterial streets. The proposal's satisfaction of the applicable development standards of the CA zone is
discussed below.
Lot Coverage — The CA zone allows a maximum building coverage of 65% of the site area. The existing
Improvements on the 76,022 square foot site total approximately.7,159 square feet and would result in a
building lot coverage of 9.42%. The proposed project is within code requirements for lot coverage.
Setbacks —The CA zone requires a minimum arterial/freeway frontage setback of 10 feet landscaped setback
from the street property line. The applicant is proposing a 10 foot setback along the property fine adjacent to
the SR167 right-of-way. The east property line is parallel to the SR167 right-of-way. The proposed structure
has a varied setback along the east property line. The southeast comer of the building is setback 10 feet and
the northeast comer is setback 30 feet from the east property line. The setback is landscaped with trees,
shrubs and groundcover. The other street frontage is East Valley Road where the parking lot is setback 10
feet the west property line.
Landscaping — Along the East Valley Road frontage and the SR 167 frontage, a minimum of 10 feet of
perimeter landscaping is proposed. Parking code requires a five foot wide landscaped perimeter and five
percent (5%) of the interior of the lot is to be landscaped to reduce the barren appearance of pavement.
Landscaped islands are provided at the ends of the two inside rows of parking. The outside rows are divided
by landscaped islands. The applicant indicates that interior parking landscape totals 5.2%, however, from
additional calculations it appears that the islands provide approximately 4% interior landscaping. Staff
recommends that two parking stalls located in the middle of the interior rows (about 10 spaces from the end of
row) be converted to landscape islands. This would increase the interior landscaping and break up the
continuous row. The parking lot perimeter would have landscaped areas of trees, shrubs and groundcover.
Existing natural vegetation along Panther Creek exists and will remain undisturbed. Approximately 43% of the
- site is proposed for landscape areas at the site perimeter, interior parking areas, and native vegetation. The
project Is located in the Green River Valley Planning Area, development regulations require an additional 2%
of natural landscaping be provided. The proposed project maintains over 24,000 square feet .of native
vegetation in the 25 foot OHWM buffer along Panther Creek. All landscaped areas are to be irrigated with an
underground sprinkler system that provides full water coverage of the planted areas (RMC 4-4-070E). The
proposal complies with landscaping requirements.
Building Height — The maximum building height permitted in the CA zone is 50 feet. The proposed building
height is approximately 29 feet measured to the midpoint of the peak of the roof. The structure is proposed to
be one-story. The project is in compliance with the CA code requirement.
Parking — Based on the City's parking regulations, the number of parking spaces required is based on use.
The proposed project includes four uses, each with a different parking requirement. The office use requires a
minimum of four (4) and a maximum of six (6) parking spaces. The dining area requires 17 spaces; one space
for the storage area; one space for loading; and 71 spaces for the gaming area use. A total of 94 to 96 spaces
are required based on the parking requirements. The project proposes a total of 99 spaces, of which 34 are
compact stalls (8 1/2 x 16 feet), 61 are standard stalls (9 x 20 feet ), and four (4) are ADA stalls. Compact
spaces are limited to a total of 30% of all parking and the proposal has 34% designated as compact. Parking
requirement modifications have been reviewed by the Development Services Director and are deemed to be
an appropriate modification. If the staff recommendation to convert two stalls to landscaped islands is
implemented, the parking provided would equal 97 stalls.
Screening The CA zone requires roof top equipment to be enclosed to be shielded from view, the HVAC
equipment would be located on the roof behind the parapet and thus not visible. The dumpster is screened by
a solid six foot high fence and perimeter landscaping. The project complies with the code requirements for
screening.
sitercREPORT.doc
City of Renton PIDPW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval & Environme,...., Review Committee Staff Report
GOLDSTREAM CASINO LUA-02-030, SA A, EGF `
REPORT AND DECISION OF MAY 7, 2002 Page 10 of 11
XX Copies of
CODIeS of
are contained in the Of
Comments are attached to this report
D. Findings, Conclusions $ Decision
Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following:
1) Request. The Applicant has requested Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan
Approval for Goldstream Casino, Project No. LUA-02-030, SA -A, ECF.
2) ' Environmental Review. The applicant's file containing the application, State Environmental Policy
Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen
comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1.
3) Site Plan Review. . The applicants site plan application complies with the requirements for
information for site plan review, provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval are complied with. The
applicant's site plan and other project drawings are entered as Exhibits No. 2 through 8.
4) Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation
of Employment Area — Valley (EAV).
5) Zoning: The Site Plan as presented, complies with the zoning requirements and development
standards of the Commercial Arterial (CA) Zoning designation.
6) Existing Land Use: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: Commercial property
(Shurgard Mini -Storage); East: State Highway 167, existing right-of-way; South: Commercial (Travelodge
Motel); West: Commercial and Industrial properties, (Movie theater and vacant home improvement store).
E. Conclusions
1) The subject proposal complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton, provided all advisory
notes and conditions of approval are complied with. -
2) The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area — Valley (EAV);
and the Zoning designation of Commercial Arterial (CA).
F. Decision
The Site Plan for the Goldstream Casino, File No. LUA-02-030, SA -A, ECF, is approved subject to the following
conditions:
1. The applicant shall revise the site plan to convert two parking spaces located midpoint of the two interior islands to ek
landscape islands. These islands should be approximately ten spaces from the end of each row. The satisfaction
of this requirement is subject to the approval of the Development Services Project Manager prior to issuance of
building permits.
2. The applicant shall submit a parking lot lighting plan for review subject to the approval of the Development
Services Project Manager prior to issuance of building permits.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION:
SIGNATURES:
Neil Watts, Development Services Director
M41 R �20oz-
W7
sitercREPORT.doc
STREAM A CASINO
SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 23 N., RANGE 5 E., W.M.
RENTON, WASHINGTON
11 W I ■ 1 1
mIrYY/If1.1. Y�.�./.�.r,,��}}I►►r
fir, UIII IIrIP.r,d.�IN,Ir.R,,rwL
W a1.11 � rlr rl w Y�.Yr �M�1I
H`rr.� �..�.....�
SrM PLAN
--smmr
.
..r..........wrl.
Nom
O wuurrwr.R.r
O rY.IrwrOrR.dl.i/,rYll
O 6MIYdrIw/wIMlYrwwrrJ•/
� r.reYlrr.arrrusw/,rrw
Q {�Ir:Y{YY/RYNIYr•I•Y�1•R
� r•rurrwwvww/ra/rrRs
� r�e.�YYwwrwrrrrw•Ir
Ow�d.60�r
YrY>YMwr
arlo•Mr
CSl[S MAIL
wRrYwlLrR rr`rrr.ur. rrrr.
•1�11 •w A
0
m c�n
`V
1�
"1 I
wrw�rl
•rllvwrrr.
YwIYr
Ir.r,.Y
� r.rwv
� WYLw
G lawrrr•I
s/rrru.or
. 1�rRrY1r
rr,
r,ar
0 rams
PK0J8 DMRMAM0N
az�a•
A®8
. �a.rwlYYn.r:
�wcn
Jr
TAXPAROLNUUM
+Yrr
A-7LBOALDUC&Wn N
wzirfzoumw
DiO Lw
'I •rrsl elyd•r11r1
rrw Y.YrrLLY1YOJL
rMIMLA& M rrl *AU.vrw
rrrrr IIM/w
' YrYrY/ dwOY.
D'�aDV
mlwrrr
rYr e►d•r.d
wRrY rrrwrYw
UM AX"
YRrrur►
wllL•WY/•1•Iw
ri/
•N//
IfRwA�IYM
Ofmm
r//
Y/Yrrw r1/rrWrr'MrrNQ
r� IMYMrrwrrOlR
w di�L•r\./IYrRM
eno®aQaviawAasAi
rr.rwwwlr
1JrI
rrgrwavw
rs/
wrra�Yrrr
rrr
w/YMlrr•ridA
I\
HOI'WmIJumK9V[AItW
r,YarY�/Y1w
rr/
Rraurrrr
urr
Yowrr�lsrlw
w/
rar.ul�rw/rWwYr
r.
YwrwwwwYY
••
auffi)m
/ram ar.rYrr•war
If.r►RIB
wrwr
r/
wrr
rrs
dlO
re/waia
rr
Y,rw
rirr
�.
rr
rrr
fr
wetl�Yr
wr
i Yrrrralr
rr.w
rrrwrsrr
rr.a
Yrr
•/�a
wenwowa.w
sr+a
ftc$WN&
► i-M
A1.0
NET AREAS BY USE
AND PARENG REQUIRED
Wit
AEA EANKM
® - Cr"= ARKA
bV v & $PACU
® - CKMAIM
16W v rl MMACU
®- dIMWd
221 v 9 WACRO
®- 4TCPAdK
m v 1 vACK
If1T1e0"
s" ap
a_ Krr J4N
•I* v
i - omen
no v
TorAL
•w v $4 WAC[!
N
FLOOR PLAN
scus---Tar--
r r
r
r
`
r.P•M
:�
r ,
D
i
N
....... ,_.........�.....
_
rA
�
i_
_
ts!
i,
A4
C
a
W
V
r�M M
ar�wr
or.1
PIL 20M
pi "M
A2.0
0• I'I
WON
w roomw
TOOL IU
I0
M••PP■
r •wr.
�j
Y. CA
b
C=7
b
ro
L 0
E
j:
e.rrww_nw s w i ai wnw� ,a�.r.s...•�ia •
rnM,■■rr■arnsrsu w rs w♦ ror �
��w•rw�vn•vwM�wr.■r■rrvr ro a rrn�� rs�o.w
ro■ns
ww�rrss_ ■ s i i w•w /r■ri�■r•r'�'wm�i�rir
a Means" eve olornommand
��•■■♦•♦ ■ ♦ ■was w•w rw•r■mow O
a■■nws•_ ■ sr s.wao w•w m•w�•adw■�w■ •
wrwr■.�we
/w pvve♦ ■ ♦•♦ rrr w•w uw■resrue
wsws■ s•♦ C ww�mss • rrrm w•w . :'rs.■rsnssa•.r■w
r■a
wa�rrr •
YwsMMIwYD■w■v • st $•e aN♦ ■wr■ooaww
MWeVeft
7111Ylt■■w■■Y■■wtrl t rrw @•o a♦•♦ rw■■nav
sw■iwaawaVmn rI■ aw.eww.0
IM11w•■■YA "Mv_ 0•Y I 1■_w - eke �f7 IIM�►UII�■r•Y�IY
ItwItY1'■O■�O�f■Y■■wiwY f •.■ew eve 1Aw7 lwirnri►wns"me w■in
��■nrmlOr■■• mmM oFiwY a •.w•w 2•1 mjn /.wwirwl /rwO
■i"
(TAT'►T?)q" f / .T.CT'T .T.KTH'T T
w �.t 77KJf
I�'Id 3.LIS
x
H2 - 25 T23N RO E 1/2
►-+ �»-
C4 c
r- rn
aN C
�
4
CIO
�
Q I -----:77
-
Ir r ca
-
i i CIO
cn
Lind Avg. SW
C/I
n
cn.
CIO
CO
ca
co
....
a.
F=CA,—E
cn
Valley
Rd.E
Valley Rd.
t�
ey Freeway
NCap
`..........
Cn
�
zn$mNEU
SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON - COUNTY OF KING
NEW IMAGE NEON, a Washington )
Corporation, )
Petitioners I, 't4G10N )
VS.
CITY OF RENTON,
WNW pEP M,N�g1F� )
Respon 0N� - )
CITY OF RENTON
3.'s5f.m•
DEC 2 3 2002
NO. RECEIVED
G� cc��CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
IGrM2-34519-1KNT
!E FA fqINO T
TO THE CLERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURT AND TO:
Name: The City of Renton, City Clerk WSB #
Address: 1055 South Grady Way Attorney For:
Renton, WA 98055
Phone: 425-430-7382
(Please note additional attorneys on reverse side.)
Please take notice that the undersigned will bring on for hearing a motion for: Initial Hearing
The hearing is requested to be held during the regular motion calendar on:
DATE UESTED FOR HEARING/MOTION
RE
, -
67 03
Nature of Case: Petition for Review of Land Use Decision
Dated: 12/23/02
Name: Warren Wissmer
Address: 6525 S. 194 h St. Attorney for: Pro Se
Kent, WA 98032
Phone: 253-740-1308
THE ABOVE INFORMATION MUST BE COMPLETED AND SIGNED
FOR CLERK'S USE ONLY
Assigned to: Date: By:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
CITY OF RENTON
3:SSp.M.
DEC 2 3 2002-
���1RECEIVED �pF1 CITY CL ER OFFICE
�'t'1
� `may
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING
NEW IMAGE NEON, Inc., a Washington
corporation,
Petitioner,
VS.
CITY OF RENTON,
Respondent.
)02-
- 2 -.3 45 19 -L
NO. -
)
MOTION FOR INITIAL HEARING
)
)
COMES NOW the petitioner, New Image Neon, a Washington corporation and bring
this Motion for Initial Hearing that sets the date on which the record must be submitted, sets
briefing schedule, sets a discovery schedule, and sets a date for the hearing or trial on the merit
pursuant to RCW 36.70C.080.
Dated this 3 day of December, 2002.
NEW IMA NE N, INC.
By: Warren Wissmer
Director of Sales, Pro Se
MOTION FOR INITIAL HEARING - I
L:\8513\P1eadings\motion.doc
C.(DPY-
CITY OF RENTON
3: SSt.^
DEC 2 3 2002
RECEIVED
k;ITY CLERK'S OFFICE
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
,(( N OR THE COUNTY. ii KING:
'v Petitioners NO
vs.
Respondent(s).
ORDER SETTING CASE SCHEDULE .
(Land Use Petitition - RCW36.70C)
ASSIGNED JUDGE: JAMES CAYCE
TRIAL DATE: Tue 5/27103
SCOMIS CODE: 'ORSCS
On Mon 12/23/02, a Petition Seeking Review of a Land Use decision has been filed in this court.
I. NOTICES
THE PERSON (PETITIONER) SEEKING REVIEW OF A LAND USE DECISION MUST:
1. File a Land Use Petition within the time frames as instructed by applicable RCW 36.70C.040.
2. Serve a copy of the Land Use Petition and this Order Setting Case Schedule (Land Use Petition)
(including these Notices) on all other parties to this action. You, as the person who started this Petition,
must make sure the other person and/or agency is notified of your action and gets a copy of the
Schedule. See Revised Code of Washington RCW 36.70C.040(5). Your signature must appear on
this form showing that you understand that you must make sure the other person and/or agency gets
a copy of this form.
3. Pay the statutory filing fee to the Clerk of the Superior Court in which the Petition is filed.
NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES:
All attorneys and parties should make themselves familiar with the rules of the court -- especially those
referred to in this Schedule. In orderto comply with the Schedule, it will be necessary for attorneys and
parties to pursue their appeals vigorously from the day they are filed. All events must occur promptly. If
they are late, the Superior Court Clerk is authorized by the King County Superior Court Local Rules to
schedule the petition for a dismissal hearing.
"I unhand that I am required to give a copy of these documents to all parties in this case."
Print Name Sign Name
ORDER SETTING LAND USE PETITION CASE SCHEDULE Revised March 2001
I. NOTICES (continued)
STIPULATION/MOTION TO CHANGE INITIAL HEARING:
Parties may file a stipulation or any party may file a motion to change the initial hearing prior to the
deadline as shown on the Schedule. A copy of the stipulation or motion must be filed with the assigned
Judge. Preliminary hearings must be set on Fridays. Stipulated change of hearing dates must be within
+/- 7 days of the original date and must be approved by the assigned judge.
MOTIONS ON JURISDICTIONAL AND PROCEDURAL ISSUES:
Motions on jurisdictional and procedural issues shall comply with Civil Rule 7 and King County Local Rule
7, except that the minimum notice of hearing requirement shall be 8 days.
PENDING DUE DATES CANCELED BY FILING PAPERS THAT RESOLVE THE CASE:
When.a final decree, judgment, or order of dismissal of all claims is filed with the Superior Court Clerk's
Office, and a courtesy copy delivered to the assigned judge, all pending due dates in this Schedule are
automatically canceled, including the scheduled Trial Date. It is the responsibility of the parties to 1) file
such dispositive documents within 45 days of the resolution of the case, and 2) strike any pending motions
by notifying the bailiff of the assigned judge.
Parties may also authorize the Superior Court to strike all pending due dates and the Trial Date by filing
a Notice of Settlement pursuant to KCLR 41, and forwarding a courtesy copy to the assigned judge. If
a final decree, judgment or order of dismissal of all claims is not filed by 45 days after a Notice of
Settlement, the case may be dismissed with notice.
If you miss your scheduled Trial Date, the Superior Court Clerk is authorized by KCLR 41(b)(2)(A) to
present an Order of Dismissal, without notice, for failure to appear at the scheduled Trial Date.
NOTICES OF APPEARANCE OR WITHDRAWAL AND ADDRESS CHANGES:
All parties to this action must keep the court informed of their addresses. When a Notice of
Appearance/Withdrawal or Notice of Change of Address is filed with the Superior Court Clerk's Office,
parties must provide the assigned judge with a courtesy copy.
NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE FEES:
ALL parties will be assessed a fee authorized by King County Code 4.71.050 whenever the Superior Court
Clerk must send notice of non-compliance of schedule requirements as per Local Rule 4 and/or dismissal
of actions as per Local Rule 41.
ORDER SETTING LAND USE PETITION CASE SCHEDULE Revised March 2001
II. CASE SCHEDULE
CASE EVENT DEADLINE or EVENT DATE
✓ Petition for Review of Land Use Decision Filed and Schedule Issued
(RCW 36.70C.040)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mon 12/23/02
DEADLINE to Contact Assigned Judge to Confirm Initial Hearing
Mon 12/30/02
(RCW 36.70C.080)
DEADLINE to Stipulate or File a Motion for Change of Hearing Date or
Adjustment of Schedule (RCW 36.70C.080(1); RCW 36.70.090)
Tue 1/21/03
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------
Initial Hearing on Jurisdictional and Preliminary Matters (FRIDAYS ONLY)
(RCW 36.70C.080)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fri 2/14/03
✓ DEADLINE for Filing Certified Copy of the Local Jurisdiction Record
(RCW 36.70C.110)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thu 3/27/03
✓ DEADLINE for filing Brief of Petitioner
Tue 4/22/03
[RCW 36.70C.080(4)]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
✓ DEADLINE for filing Brief of Respondent
Tue 5/13/03
[RCW 36.70C.080(4)]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
✓ DEADLINE for filing Reply Briefs [RCW 36.70C.080(4)]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tue 5/20/03
Review Hearing/Trial Date (MONDAYS ONLY - Approximately 154 days after
filing) (RCW 36.70C.090)
Tue 5/27/03
✓ Indicates a document that must be filed with the Superior Court Clerk's Office by the date shown.
III. ORDER
Pursuant to the Revised Code of Washington (RCW 36.70C) the King County Superior Court issues an
Order Setting Case Schedule (Land Use Petition ) when a Land Use Petition is filed with the King County
Superior Court. It is ORDERED that all parties involved in this action shall comply with the schedule listed
above and that failure to meet these event dates will result in the dismissal of the petition. It is FURTHER
ORDERED that the party filing this action must serve this Order Setting Case Schedule (Land Use
Petition) and attachment on all other parties.
DATED: 12/23/2002
ORDER SETTING LAND USE PETITION CASE SCHEDULE
a'A"a L" S,4�
Richard die-, JUDGE
Revised March 2001
LAND USE PETITION ACT Page 4 of 6
IV. ORDER ON CIVIL PROCEEDINGS FOR ASSIGNMENT TO JUDGE
READ THIS ORDER PRIOR TO CONTACTING YOUR ASSIGNED JUDGE
This case is assigned to the Superior Court Judge whose name appears in the caption
of this Schedule. The assigned Superior Court Judge will preside over and manage this case
and will conduct trials, motions, and conferences in this matter until completion of all issues.
COMPLEX LITIGATION: If you anticipate an unusually complex or lengthy trial, please
notify the assigned court as soon as possible.
The following procedures hereafter apply to the processing of this case:
APPLICABLE RULES:
Except as specifically modified below, all the provisions of KCLR 4-26 shall apply to
the processing of civil cases before Superior Court Judges.
CASE SCHEDULE AND REQUIREMENTS:
A. Trial: Trial is confirmed for 9:00 a.m. on the date on the Schedule. The Friday
before trial, the assigned court will contact the parties to determine the status of
the case and inform the parties of any adjustments to the Trial Date.
B. Show Cause Hearing: A Show Cause Hearing will be held before the assigned
judge if the
case is not at issue. If the case is not at issue or in accordance with the attached
case schedule, all parties will receive and Order to Show Cause that will set a
specific date and time for the hearing. All parties and/or counsel are required to
attend.
C. Joint Pretrial Report: 120 days before the Trial Date, parties shall prepare and
file,
with a copy to the assigned judge, a joint pretrial report setting forth the nature
of the case, whether a jury demand has been filed, the expected duration of the
trial, the status of. discovery, the need to amend pleadings or add parties, whether
a settlement conference has been scheduled, special problems, etc.
Plaintiff's/Petitioner's counsel is responsible for proposing and contacting, the
other parties regarding said report.
D. Pretrial Conference: A pretrial conference will be scheduled by the assigned
judge.
Approximately thirty (30) days before the conference, you will receive an Order
Setting Pretrial Conference that will set the specific date and time for the
conference. The conference will be held in the courtroom of the assigned judge,
and the following nonexclusive list of matters will be addressed at that time:
1) Status of settlement discussions;
2) Jury trial -- selection and number of jurors;
3) Potential evidentiary problems;
4) Potential motions in limine;
SEE NEXT PAGE
revised 5/29/2002
L: forms/cashiers/iv orders
LAND USE PETITION ACT Page 5 of 6
5) Use of depositions;
6) Deadlines for nondispositive motions;
7) Procedures to be followed with respect to exhibits;
S) Witnesses -- identity, number, testimony;
9) Special needs (e.g. interpreters, equipment);
10) Trial submissions, such as briefs, Joint Statement of Evidence, jury
instructions,
voir dire questions, etc.
11) Receipt of Public Assistance Payments (Domestic Cases) -- If any party is on
public Assistance, notify the Prosecutor's Office of this proceeding now at- 296-
9020.
E. Settlement/Mediation/ADR:
1) 45 days before the Trial Date, counsel for plaintiff shall submit a written
settlement demand. Ten (1,0) days after receiving plaintiff's written
demand, counsel for defendant shall respond (with a counteroffer, if
appropriate).
2) 30 days before the Trial Date, a settlement/ media tion/ADR conference
shall have
been held. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
REQUIREMENT MAY RESULT IN SANCTIONS.
3) 20 days before the Trial Date, counsel for plaintiff shall advise the
assigned judge
of the progress of the settlement process.
MOTIONS PROCEDURES:
A. Noting of Motions
1) Dispositive Motions: All Summary Judgment or other motions that dispose
of the case in whole or in part will be heard with oral argument before the
assigned judge. The moving party must arrange with the bailiff a date and
time for the hearing, consistent with the court rules.
2) Nondispositive Motions: These motions, which include discovery motions,.
will be
ruled on by the assigned judge without oral argument, unless otherwise
ordered. All such motions must be noted for a date by which the ruling is
requested; this date must likewise conform to the applicable notice
requirements. Rather than noting a time of day, the Note for Motion
should state "Without Oral Argument."
SEE NEXT PAGE
revised 5/29/2002
L: forms/cashiers/iv orders
LAND USE PETITION ACT Page 6 of 6
3) Motions in Family Law Cases: Discovery motions to compel, motions in
limine1
motions relating to trial dates and motions to vacate judgments/dismissals
shall be brought before the assigned judge. All other motions should be
noted and heard on the Family Law Motions Calendar.
4) Emergency Motions: Emergency motions will be allowed only upon entry
of an Order
Shortening Time. However, emergency discovery disputes may be
addressed by telephone call, and without written motion, if the judge
approves.
B. Filing of Papers All original papers must be filed with the Clerk's Office on the
6th floor.
The working copies of all papers in support or opposition must be marked on the
upper right corner of the first page with the date of consideration or hearing and
the name of the assigned judge. The assigned judge's working copy must be
delivered to his/her courtroom or to the judges' mailroom. Do not file working
copies with the Motions Coordinator, except those motions to be heard on the
Family Law Motions Calendar, in which case the working copies should be filed
with the Family Law Motions Coordinator.
1) Original Proposed Order: Each of the parties must include in the..working
copy materials submitted on any motion an original proposed order
sustaining his/her side of the argument. Should any party desire a copy of
the order as signed and filed by the judge, a preaddressed, stamped
envelope shall accompany the proposed order.
2) Presentation of Orders: All orders, agreed or otherwise, must be
presented to the
assigned judge. If that judge is absent, contact the assigned court for
further instructions. If another judge enters an order on the case, counsel
is responsible for providing the assigned judge with a copy.
Proposed orders finalizing settlement and/or dismissal by agreement of all parties
shalt be presented to the assigned judge or in the Ex Parte Department. Formal
Proof in Family Law cases must be scheduled before the assigned judge by
contacting the bailiff, or Format Proof may be entered in the Ex Parte
Department. If final orders and/or Formal Proof are entered in the Ex Parte
Department, counsel is responsible for providing the assigned judge with a copy.
C. Form: Memoranda/briefs for matters heard by the assigned judge may not
exceed 24 pages
for dispositive motions and 12 pages for nondispositive motions, unless the
assigned judge permits over -length memoranda/briefs in advance of filing. Over -
length memoranda/briefs and motions supported by such memoranda/briefs may
be stricken.
IT IS SO ORDERED. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN
DISMISSAL OR OTHER SANCTIONS. PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER SHALL FORWARD A COPY OF THIS
ORDER AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE TO ANY PARTY WHO HAS NOT RECEIVED THIS ORDER.
f4a,a A) JUDGE
Richard D. Eadie
revised 5/29/2002
L: forms/cashiers/iv orders
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Al #: . ,
Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works
For Agenda of: January 6, 2003
Dept/Div/Board.. Development Services Division
Agenda Status
Staff Contact...... Juliana Sitthidet x:7278
Consent .............. X
Public Hearing..
Subject:
COBBLESTONE FINAL PLAT
Correspondence.. Ordinance .............
File No. LUA-02-073FP (LUA-01-082PP)
Resolution............ X
4.7 acres located in the vicinity of Union Ave NE and
Old Business........
NE 4tb Street
New Business.......
Exhibits:
1. Resolution and Legal Description
Study Sessions......
2. Staff report and recommendation
Information.........
Recommended Action:
Council concur
Approvals:
Legal Dept....
Finance Dept
Other............
Fiscal Impact: N/A
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The recommendation for approval of the referenced final plat is submitted for Council action.
This plat divides 4.7 acres into 66 lots intended for townhouses. The construction of the utilities
and street improvements to serve the lots is almost complete at this time. All construction will be
approved, accepted or guaranteed as required through the Board of Public Works prior to the
recording of the plat. All conditions placed on the preliminary plat by City Council will be met
prior to the recording of the plat.
X
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the Cobblestone Final Plat, LUA-02-073FP, with the following conditions and adopt the
resolution.
1. All plat fees shall be paid prior to the recording of the plat.
2. All plat improvements shall be either constructed or deferred to the satisfaction of City
staff prior to the recording of the plat.
C:\Proj ects\Cobblestone\Close-out\A gnbi ll.dot/
CITY OF RENTON, WASIIINGTON
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
APPROVING FINAL PLAT (COBBLESTONE; FILE NO. LUA-02-073FP)
WHEREAS, a petition for the approval of a final plat for the subdivision of a certain tract
of land as hereinafter more particularly described, located within the City of Renton, has
heretofore been duly approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department; and
WHEREAS, after due investigation the Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public
Works Department has considered and recommended the approval of said final plat, and such
approval being deemed proper and advisable and in the public interest; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that appropriate provisions are made for
the public health, safety, and general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or
roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and
recreation, playgrounds, schools and schoolgrounds and all other relevant facts, including
sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who walk
to and from school; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the public use and interest will be
served by the platting of such subdivision and dedication;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects.
RESOLUTION NO.
SECTION H. The final plat heretofore submitted and approved by the
Planning/Building/Public Works Department pertaining to the following described real estate, to
wit:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth
(The groperty, consisting of approximately 4.7 acres, is located in the vicinity of
NE 4 Street and Union Avenue NE)
be and the same is hereby approved as such plat, subject to the laws and ordinances of the City of
Renton, and subject to the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the
Planning/Building/Public Works Department dated December 19, 2002.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2002.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk'
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this T day of
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RES.961:12/26/02:ma
Jesse Tanner, Mayor
2002.
0
COBBLESTONE LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PARCEL A:
PARCEL•C OF CITY OF RENTON BOUNDARY LINE REVISION NO. LUA-01-
081-LLA, RECORDED OCTOBER 9, 2001 UNDER RECORDING NO.
20011009900011 IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
PARCEL B:
LOT 1 OF KING COUNTY SHORT PLAT NO 8112039003, ACCORDING TO
SHORT PLAT RECORDED DECEMBER 3, 1981, BEING CITY OF RENTON SHORT
PLAT NO. 07G-81 (PICKERING SHORT PLAT), IN KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTON.
UNP-LATTED
21 20 19 18 17 16 15, 14 13• 12
U N PLATTE D
M ?�
42 43
22 41 44 I
i0 45 '11 10 9 e 7 6 •5 4-
r. 23 _ 39 46
. 1 24 38 7R.• C .
25 47 53 66
37 • TR..F ' Z
26 • 30 65 O
z -
27 . 35 49 56 64
63
• 28
34 50 67
29 51 58 64 LOT 2 Z
CITY OF wm"
30 �12J 52 59 61 SHORT PLAT 076-81
R£C. N0. 8112.039003
31 ,
PARCH B PARCEL A
CITY OF RDIM
LOT 1JNE ADJUS'fUM
LUA-01-•081-4-LA •U NPLATTED
REC. NO. 2001100990001
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION
BUILDING/PLANNING/PUBLIC WORKS
CITY OF RENTON
STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
RECOMMENDATION:
Northward Homes
Attn: Patrick Gilroy
Cobblestone Final Plat.
File: LUA 02-073FP
Union Ave NE, between NE 4t'' Street (south) and
NE 6th Street (north).
Section 9, Twp. 23 N., Rng 5 E.
Final Plat for 66 lots intended for townhouse
with water, sanitary sewer, storm, street and
lighting.
Approve With Conditions
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION
Having reviewed the record documents in this matter, staff now makes and enters the following:
FINDINGS:
1. The applicant, Patrick Gilroy, filed a request for approval of Cobblestone Final Plat.
2. The yellow file containing all staff reports, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)
documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit No. 1.
3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official, issued a
Determination on Non -Significance -Mitigated on July 17, 2001 for the subject proposal.
4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter.
5. The subject site is located on Union Ave NE, between NE 4t' Street and NE 6t' Street. The
new plat is located in Section 9, Twp. 23 N., Rug 5 E.
6. The subject site consist of two parcels totaling 4.7-acre.
7. The Preliminary Plat was approved by the City of Renton Council on October 22, 2001.
8. The site is zoned Center Suburban (CS).
9. The Final Plat complies with both the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan.
C:\Projects\Cobblestoiie\Close-out\Repoi-t.doc\coi-
10. The Preliminary Plat was subject to a number of conditions as a result of both environmental
review and site plan/plat review. The applicant complied with the conditions imposed by the
ERC:
a. The construction drawings comply with the recommendations contained within the
Geotechnical Report, dated April 23, 2001.
b. The Traffic Mitigation Fee will be paid prior to recording of the plat.
c. "No Parking" signs will be installed on both sides of all 20-foot roadways within the
development, prior to recording of the plat.
d. The Parks Mitigation Fee will be paid prior to recording of the plat.
e. The Fire Mitigation Fee will be paid prior to recording of the plat.
11. In addition, the applicant has complied with the conditions imposed as a result of Site
Plan/Preliminary Plat:
f. The applicant will comply with conditions contained within the Administrative Parking
Modification decision and Administrative Center Residential Demonstration District
Modifications decision prior to the issuance of building permits for the project.
g. The Lot Line Adjustment was recorded prior to recording the plat.
h. A Homeowner Association will be created concurrently with the plat and will have the
maintenance responsibility for the private stormwater facility, maintenance of the
landscaped right-of-way and maintenance of common space improvements.
i. The plan was revised to provide a pedestrian connection from the south end of the plat's
island to the abutting commercial development.
j. Streetlights will be provided throughout the development.
CONCLUSIONS
The Final Plat generally appears to satisfy the conditions imposed by the preliminary plat process
and therefore should be approved by the City Council.
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council should approve the Final Plat with the following conditions:
1. All plat fees shall be paid prior to the recording of the plat.
2. All plat improvements shall be either constructed or deferred to the satisfaction of City staff
prior to the recording of the plat.
SUBMITTED THIS 191h DAY OF DECEMBER, 2002
_k
t
3 ;
J IANA SITT DET
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION
cc: Kayren Kittrick
LUA02-073
C:\Projects\Cobblestone\Close-out\Report.doc\cor
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works
Dept/Div/Board...... Development Services
Staff Contact......... Jan Illian x 7216
Subject:
THE VINEYARDS PLAT
File No. LUA 02-123FP (LUA 00-029)
7.32 acres located between NE 5T" and NE 6T" on Union Ave NE
Exhibits:
1. Resolution, legal description, vicinity and project site map
2. Staff Report and Recommendation
Al #: 5, e
For Agenda of: January 6, 2003
Agenda Status
Consent ........... X
Public Hearing.
Correspondence
Ordinance........
Resolution........ X
Old Business ...
New Business..
Study Sessions
Information.......
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Legal Dept.. X
Council concur Finance Dept
Other ..........
-iscal Impact:
Expenditure Required. Transfer/Amendment....
Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......
Summary of Action:
The recommendation for approval of the referenced final plat is submitted for Council action. This plat divides 7.32
acres into 42 single-family residential lots. The construction of the utilities and street improvements to serve the lots is
complete at this time. All construction will be approved, accepted or guaranteed as required through the Board of Public
Works prior to recording of the plat. All conditions placed on the preliminary plat by City Council will be met prior to the
recording of the plat.
Staff Recommendation:
Approve the The Vineyards Plat - LUA 02-123FP, with the following conditions and adopt the resolution.
1. All plat improvements shall be either constructed or deferred to the satisfaction of City staff prior to the recording
of the plat.
2. All plat fees shall be paid prior to recording of the plat
Agenda bill
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
APPROVING FINAL PLAT (THE VINEYARDS PLAT; FILE NO. LUA-02-
123FP)
WHEREAS, a petition for the approval of a final plat for the subdivision of a certain tract
of land as hereinafter more particularly described, located within the City of Renton, has
heretofore been duly approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department; and
WHEREAS, after due investigation the Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public
Works Department has considered and recommended the approval of said final plat, and such
approval being deemed proper and advisable and in the public interest; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that appropriate provisions are made for
the public health, safety, and general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or
roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and
recreation, playgrounds, schools and schoolgrounds and all other relevant facts, including
sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who walk
to and from school; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the public use and interest will be
served by the platting of such subdivision and dedication;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects.
1
RESOLUTION NO.
SECTION II. The final plat heretofore submitted and approved by the
Planning/Building/Public Works Department pertaining to the following described real estate, to
wit:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth
(The property, consisting of approximately 7.32 acres, is located in the vicinity of
Union Avenue NE and NE 0' Street)
be and the same is hereby approved as such plat, subject to the laws and ordinances of the City of
Renton, and subject to the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the
Planning/Building/Public Works Department dated December 1, 2002.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RES.960:12/16/02:ma
day of 2002.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
day of , 2002.
Jesse Tanner, Mayor
2
THE VINEYARDS VICINITY MAP
311S 103rM1d S(RJdk3NIA 3H1 J
—{ ---�---------- _ H'11 '3AV IQOIAIf1
II
'4 7f1VM97t OM a 7VILL
II I wmna� TfW W 6MONDMi!
•r
�
I I YIt�S DII[dt119 I 'I
I I
I
"I
n co ss3 ai avJn I yl y + I .
�/ I I Arena
A16100 NOW" roe a muv w
�wleeie vevn aw Mum xn olmm
iE dana ou i I M�a ao[ afuun 3M A
f l •>tvx MVWDOa 7wr. •.
1108 T7 m
lOVMl rravr yrI a
mIo[o
71l A• mlOraaY ! AY11 m511/ 'InflRalll ssva Ol !MO
-.---- / � � I I + ' > i _ ... 31116 9Y717 VIINYAM 9 "M1 191T/ Ol Inf1040 1D1M1 7Y Ol 317
ay9 'MINI 1� Y.7 mMIA'1YD
a ■.
rpowra ON[a
('ONI 5314oH 1Nomme)
aw[ aw I 3oVNIVlIa I I \ N3MdOl3A3a 311fllfli W.4
aaura oM I I •8, lOVMl ( \ 3a .3. IOVMI .
I
I
— I
r I I
of 14------------�----------- — — _ r — — � t `
+� r r
fI
s t l 4
I. `I
II 71Y11 ,
;; � + - -------- --�---- ---_ I I I Bf - I ��
wwnm+ l3M aNV1
I E
----------- I I z+ Bz i cr i ec i (•3 d•a•N> .a. Laval
lti Oti
G I
7u Aw I I 8l + j I I `z 'te
,
8 aowra oM oZJw
IBl I as AM I I i I as anal i I ombwd Or
-_---'— wawa aI
cc
AW
'
dON ! €
lz I zz I rz j tz j sz j!. cz j 8z I i t
ez ! I I fez � oc {I le
` z£
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION
BUILDING/PLANNING/PUBLIC WORKS
CITY OF RENTON
STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
APPLICANT:
Belmont Homes
The Vineyards Plat
LUA00-029PP
File: LUA 02-123 FP
LOCATION: NE 5th Street and Union Ave NE
SW 1/4 Section 10, Twn. 23N. Rge. 5E.
WM
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Final Plat for 42 single-family residential
lots with water, sewer, storm, streets and
lighting.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve With Conditions
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION
Having reviewed the record documents in this matter, staff now makes and enters the following:
FINDINGS:
1. The applicant, Bob Wenzl of Belmont Homes, filed a request for approval of a 42 lot Final Plat.
2. The yellow file containing all staff reports, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)
documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit No. 1.
3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official, issued a Determination
of Non -Significance -Mitigated on Mayl5, 2001, for the subject proposal.
4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter.
5. The subject site is located at NE 5th Street and Union Ave NE. The new plat is located in the SW'/4
Section 10, Twn. 23N. Rge. 5E. WM
6. The subject site is a 7.32 acre parcel.
7. The Preliminary Plat received City of Renton Council approval on October 15, 2001.
8. The site has a R-10 (Single Family) land use zoning, with the adoption of Ordinance 4404 enacted
in June 1993.
9. The Final Plat complies with both the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan.
Page 2
10. The Preliminary Plat was subject to a number of conditions as a result of both environmental review
and plat review. The applicant has complied with the conditions imposed by the ERC:
1) The project complied with the condition of designing to the 1998 King County Surface Water
Manual Level II Flow Control for detention and water quality.
2) Applicant is in the process of constructing a four -foot high split rail fence delineating the
wetland buffers. This will be completed prior to recording.
3) Transportation Mitigation fees will be paid prior to recording of the plat.
4) Fire Mitigation fees will be paid prior to recording of the plat.
5) Park Mitigation fees will be paid prior to recording of the plat.
11. In addition, the applicant has complied with the conditions imposed as a result of Preliminary Plat:
1) Applicant complied with the above noted ERC conditions.
2) A maintenance agreement has been drafted and submitted for review for the maintenance of
all common stormwater and access improvements.
3) Applicant has provided a survey report from ADaPT Engineering, a licensed firm with
expertise in hazardous substances.
4) Applicant has provided means of recharging the aquifer and wetlands.
5) Applicant installed a gravel pathway along the wetland buffer, which was approved by the City.
6) The pathway does not intrude into the lot areas or sideyards of any of the lots.
CONCLUSIONS:
The Final Plat generally appears to satisfy the conditions imposed by the preliminary plat process and
therefore should be approved by the City Council.
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council should approve the Final Plat with the following conditions:
1. All plat improvements shall be either constructed or deferred to the satisfaction of City staff prior to
the recording of the plat.
2. All fees shall be paid prior to the recording of the plat.
SUBMITTED THIS 1st DAY of December, 2002
DE OPMENT SERVICES DIVISION
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Submitting Data:
Dept/Div/Board..
Staff Contact......
EDNSP
Elizabeth Higgins
Subject:
Center/Office/Residential 3 Zone Code Amendment
Exhibits:
Issue Paper and Draft Code Amendments
Al #: , r o-
For Agenda of:
January 6, 2003
Agenda Status
Consent ..............
Public Hearing..
Correspondence..
Ordinance .............
Resolution............
Old Business........
New Business.......
Study Sessions......
Information .........
/KI
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Refer to Planning Commission and Planning and Legal Dept......... X
Development Committee Finance Dept......
Other ...............
Fiscal Impact: None
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget N/A City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Amendments have been proposed to the Renton Municipal Code that would allow "big -box retail" to
be developed in the Center/Office/Residential 3 zone in a location delineated as "east of Garden
Avenue North."
Currently, big -box retail is allowed in Light, Medium, and Heavy Industrial zones and in Commercial
Arterial zones.
Center/Office/Residential is an implementing zone within the Center/Office/Residential and
Employment Area — Transition (Interim) Comprehensive Plan designations.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Concur with recommendation to refer this to the Planning Commission and the Planning and
Development Committee of the City Council.
CITY OF RENTON
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS,
AND STRATEGIC PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 30, 2002
TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, President
City Council Members
VIA: Mayor Jesse Tanner
"151
C'
FROM: Alex Pietsch, Acting Administrator
Economic Development, Neighborhoods,
and Strategic Planning Department
STAFF CONTACT: Elizabeth Higgins (6576)
SUBJECT: Center/Office/Residential Zone Code Amendment
ISSUE:
Amend code to allow big -box retail in the Center/Office/Residential 3 Zone, east of Garden
Avenue North.
RECOMMENDATION:
Refer to Planning Commission and Planning and Development Committee
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
Center/Office/Residential is an implementing zone within the Center/Office/Residential and
Employment Area — Transition (Interim) Comprehensive Plan designations. The proposed
rezone would be consistent with the following Comprehensive Plan policies:
Policy LU-212.31 Uses should be selected from the range of uses allowed in the
existing CA Zone to encourage a group of activities that are synergistic with
office, biotech, research, technology, and residential. Strip commercial,
veterinary, kennels, adult entertainment, outdoor storage, contractors' services,
and convalescent centers are examples of uses discouraged under this designation.
Traditional retail (Main Street), general business and professional services, and
H:\EDNSP\Council\Issue Papers -Agenda Bills -Cite Reports\2003\COR 3 code amendment. docLast printed 12/31/2002 9:27
AM
December 31, 2002
Page 2
general offices are examples of the types of uses that are encouraged under this
designation. Disallow the following uses: vehicle sales and service including
automobiles, RVs, boats, truck and motorcycles.
Policy LU-212.36 Changes in zoning from industrial to another zone should
achieve a mix of uses that improves the City's economic base and employment
base. Factors such as increasing the City's tax base, improving efficiency in the
use of the land, and the ability of a proposed land use to mitigate potential adverse
impacts should be taken into account.
The proposed code amendment would result in a modification of the uses allowed in the
Center/Office/Residential 3 (COR 3) Zone. The proposed code amendment would allow "big -
box retail" to be developed in the Center/Office/Residential 3 zone in a location delineated as
"east of Garden Avenue North."
Currently, big -box retail is allowed in Light, Medium, and Heavy Industrial zones and in
Commercial Arterial (CA) zones. At present, CA is not an implementing zone of the Center /
Office / Residential (COR) and Employment Area — Transition (EA-T) designations and,
therefore, could not be used for this area without a Comprehensive Plan amendment.
Furthermore, such an amendment would not be appropriate because the general characteristics
of the CA zone are not consistent with current policies of the COR and EA-T designations.
Study of the appropriateness of industrial uses and several types of commercial zoning is now
being initiated as a result of the recent moratorium on development in the 1H zone. The analysis
of the subarea may eventually result in plan and/or code amendments that would make either
industrial or CA zoning appropriate for this area. At the present time, however, the proposed
code amendments, and simultaneous rezone of the area (by separate application), are the most
expeditious route to attain the immediate goal of allowing big -box retail on this site without
allowing it throughout the entire industrial designation.
Big -box retail is defined in RMC Title IV as:
A single indoor retail or wholesale user who occupies no less than seventy five
thousand (75,000) square feet of gross floor area, typically requires high parking to
building area ratios, and has a regional sales market. Big -box retail/wholesale sales
can include, but are not limited to, membership warehouse clubs that emphasize
bulk sales, discount stores, and department stores. This definition does not include
auto sales, outdoor retail sales, and adult retail uses.
The COR 3 Zone is the property commonly known as the Southport site. The proposed code
amendment would expand the COR 3 to include the property commonly known as the Fry's
site. The area would be further delineated as being located, "east of Garden Avenue North."
The south portion of the Fry's site is currently being developed for big -box retail use. Fry's
Electronics will be a one-story, 151,200 square foot retail building with surface parking for 900
vehicles.
December 31, 2002
Page 3
CONCLUSION:
This code amendment is being requested to allow big -box retail in an area of the City of Renton
deemed suitable for this type of use, based on available infrastructure, visibility from high -
volume transportation corridors, and need.
Document6/
O. CENTER OFFICE RESIDENTIAL ZONE (COR 1, COR 2, and COR 3):
1. Purpose: The purpose of the Center Office Residential Zone is to provide for a mix of
intensive office, hotels and convention centers and residential activity in a high -quality,
master planned development, that is integrated with the natural environment.
Commercial retail and service uses that are architecturally and functionally integrated are
permitted. Also, commercial uses that provide high economic value may be allowed if
designed with the scale and intensity envisioned for the COR Zone. Policies governing
these uses are contained in the Land Use Element, Center Office Residential section, of
the City's Comprehensive Plan. The scale and location of these sites will typically denote
a gateway into the City and should be designed accordingly (see also Land Use Element,
Community Design — Gateways section). Since the sites function as gateways, site
planning should incorporate features of interest to the users.
2. Location: In order to address differing site conditions, and recognizing the gateway and
environmentally sensitive features of these sites, this Zone is divided into three (3)
sections:
a. COR 1 is applied to the property commonly known as the Stoneway Concrete
Site.
b. COR 2 is applied to the property commonly known as the Port Quendall Site.
C. COR 3 is applied to the property commonly known as the Southport S4e- and
Frv's sites.
3. Scale and Intensity: COR 1 and 2 share the same uses and development standards,
but differ in heights allowed. COR 3 shares a majority of uses allowed in COR 1 and
COR 2 as well as most development standards, but differs primarily in densities allowed.
4-2-060
ZONING USE TABLE
RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS
INDUSTRIAL
COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS
USES
C R-1 R-5 R-8 RMH
tH
R-10 R-14 RM
IL IM IH
CC CN CS
CA CD CO
COR
Service and social organizations H H H H
H H H H H H
H H H
H IH IH12
1-121
Public Facilities
City government offices
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
P
AD
City government facilities
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
Jails, existing municipal
p
Other government offices and
facilities
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H. OFFICE & CONFERENCE
Conference centers
P38
P38
P38
P38
P
P
P21
Medical and dental offices
P42
P38
P38
P38
AD22
P22
P
P
P
P
Offices, general
P42
P13
P13
P13
AD17
P22
P22
P
P
P
P
Veterinary offices/clinics
P
P42
P38
P38
P38
AD22
P22
P
P
P38
P
I. RETAIL
Adult retail use
P43
P43
P43
P43
P43
P43
P43
P43
Big -box retail
P
P
P
P71
Drive-in/drive-through, retail
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC28
Eating and drinking establishments
P1
P1
P1
P1
P1
H33
P42
P
P
P
P22
P22
P22
P
P
P12
P27
Horticultural nurseries
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
Retail sales
H33
AD
P34
P34
P34
P60
P68
P22
P
P
P54
P21
Retail sales, outdoor
P30
P30
P30
P15
P15
P
P15
Taverns
AD
AD
P
AD
P21
Vehicle sales, large
P
P
P
P41
Vehicle sales, small
P
P
P
P
J. ENTERTAINMENT & RECREATION
Entertainment
Adult entertainment business
P43
P43
P43
P43
P43
P43
P43
P43
Card room
P52
P52
P52
P52
Cultural facilities
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
D
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
Dance clubs
P38
P38
P38
AD22
P
H
P38
H
Dance halls
P38
P38
P38
AD22
P
H
P38
H
Gaming/gambling facilities, not -for-
profit
H38
H29
H38
H
H38
Movie theaters
P38
P38
P38
P
P
P12
Blank = Not Allowed P = Permitted Use P# = Permitted provided condition AC = Accessory Use
can be met
AD = Administrative Conditional Use H = Hearing Examiner Conditional # = Condition(s)
Use
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses
Permitted in the Automall Improvement Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
ATTACHMENT
4-2-0700 CENTER OFFICE RESIDENTIAL (COR)
USES: TYPE:
AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL
RESOURCES
Natural resource extraction/recovery H
NIMALS & RELATED USES
Kennels, hobby
AC #37
Pets, common household, up to 3 per
dwelling unit or business
establishment
AC
ESIDENTIAL
Attached dwelling P #19
OTHER RESIDENTIAL, LODGING AND
HOME OCCUPATIONS
Group homes II for 6 or less
P
Group homes II for 7 or more
AD
Home occupations
AC #6
Retirement residences
P
SCHOOLS
-12 educational institution (public or
rivate)
H #9
-12 educational institution (public or
private), existing
P #9
Other higher education institution
P #21
ARKS
Parks, neighborhood
P
Parks, regional/community, existing
P
Parks, regional/cornmunity, new
AD
OTHER COMMUNITY & PUBLIC
ACILITIES
Community Facilities
Cemetery
H
Religious institutions
H
Service and social organizations
H #21
Public Facilities
City government offices
AD
City government facilities
H
Other government offices and
facilities
H
OFFICE AND CONFERENCE
Conference Center
P #21
edical and dental offices
P
Offices, general
P
Veterinary offices/clinics
P
ETAIL
Big -box retail
P#71
Eating and drinking establishments
P #27
Horticultural nurseries
H
Retail sales
P #21
Taverns
P #21
NTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION
Entertainment
Cultural facilities
AD
Dance clubs
H
Dance halls
H
Recreation
Golf courses(existing)
P
Golf courses (new)
H
Marinas
P #21
Recreation facilities, indoor
P #21
SERVICES
Services, General
Hotel
P
On -site services
P #21
Drive-in/drive-through service
AC #61
Day Care Services
Adult day care I
P
Adult day care II
P #21
Day care centers
P #21
Family day care
AC
Healthcare Services
Convalescent centers
AD
Medical institutions
H
EHICLE RELATED ACTIVITIES
Parking garage, structured,
commercial or public
P
Air Transportation Uses
eli ads, accessory to primary use H
STORAGE
Indoor storage AC # 11
INDUSTRIAL
ustrial, General
oratories: research, development
Lndtesting
H
ATTACHMENT
4-2-0700 CENTER OFFICE RESIDENTIAL (COR)
Manufacturing and fabrication, heavy
P #23
Manufacturing and fabrication, light
P #23
Manufacturing and fabrication,
medium
P #23
Solid Waste/Recycling
Recycling collection station P
TILITIES
Communications broadcast and relay
towers
H
Electrical power generation and
cogeneration
H #66
Utilities, small
P
Utilities, medium
AD
Utilities, large
H
IRELESS COMMUNICATION
ACILITIES
Lattice towers support structures
H #48
Macro facility antennas
P #44
Solid Waste/Recycling
Recycling collection station and
processing center
P #38
Recycling collection station
P
Sewage disposal and treatment plants
H
Waste recycling and transfer facilities
P
TILITIES
Communications broadcast and relay
towers
H #38
Electrical power generation and
cogeneration
H #66
Utilities, small
P
Utilities, medium
AD
Utilities, large
H
IRELESS COMMUNICATION
ACILITIES
Lattice towers support structures
AD #47
Macro facility antennas
P #44
Micro facility antennas
P
Mini facility antennas
P #44
Minor modifications to existing
fireless communication facilities
P #49
Monopole I support structures
P #44
Monopole II support structures
AD #47
GENERAL ACCESSORY USES
Micro facility antennas
P
Mini facility antennas
P #44
Minor modifications to existing
fireless communication facilities
P #49
Monopole I support structures
AD #46
Monopole II support structures
H #48
GENERAL ACCESSORY USES
Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-050 and
s defined in RMC 4-11, where not
otherwise listed in the Use Table
AC
TEMPORARY USE
Model homes in an approved
esidential development: one model
home on an existing lot
P #53
Sales/marketing trailers, onsite
P #53
Temporary or manufactured buildings
used for construction
P #10
Temporary uses
P #53
Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-050 and
s defined in RMC 4-11, where not
otherwise listed in the Use Table
AC
TEMPORARY USE
Sales/marketing trailers, onsite
P #53
Temporary or manufactured buildings
used for construction
P #10
Temporary uses
P #53
CODE CITATION — RMC 4-2-080.A
Proposed Use Note - #71
71. Big -box retail to be permitted in the COR3 Zone, east of Garden Avenue North.
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
AI #:�
SUBMITTING DATA: I FOR AGENDA OF: January 6, 2003
Dept/Div/Board.... Human Resources & Risk Management
Staff Contact ......... Michael Webby AGENDA STATUS:
Consent ................. X
SUBJECT: Public Hearing.....
Review of Property & Liability Claims Correspondence...
Ordinance .............
Resolution ............
Old Business.........
EXHIBITS: New Business.......
Study Session........
Other .....................
RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPROVALS:
Refer to Finance Committee Legal Dept............
Finance Dept........
Other .....................
FISCAL IMPACT:
Expenditure Required None Transfer/Amendment....
i Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated.......
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The City self -funds its property and liability insurance programs. Generally speaking, the Washington Cities
Insurance Authority (WCIA) manages claims for losses occurring after January 1, 2000. The City is responsible
for paying the first $250,000 of liability claims and the first $25,000 of property claims. WCIA manages a
$50,000 claims fund, which is reimbursed by the City as losses are paid.
The purpose of this discussion is to determine how and when the Finance Committee wishes to review property
and liability claims.
1.
CITY OF RENTON CO UNCIL A GENDA BILL
SUBMITTING DATA:
Dept/Div .... Human Resources & Risk Mgmt
Staff Contact ........... Michael Webby (x-7650)
SUBJECT:
Modifications to the City's healthcare plan
effective January 1, 2003
EXHIBITS:
#1 —Plan A
#2 — Plan B
Al11 #: 5,11
FOR AGENDA OF: 01/06/03
AGENDA STATUS:
Consent .................
Public Hearing.....
Correspondence...
Ordinance...........
Resolution .............
Old Business.......
New Business.......
Study Session........
Other .....................
RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPROVALS:
Legal Dept............
Refer to Finance Committee Finance Dept........
Other..................X
IMPACT:
None
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Transfer/Amendment....
Revenue Generated.......
The changes in the City's self funded medical plan identified below have been endorsed by
the Health Benefits Task Force and negotiated through the collective bargaining process.
The nature of these changes are either mandatory or for purposes of clarification of
coverage. The discretionary change involves increasing the co -pay from $5.00 to $25.00.
The maximum number of co -pays is ten (10) per person ($250 per year), or twenty five (25)
co -pays per family ($625). The Emergency Room, MRI and Sterilization co -pays are increased
to $100 and are not included in the $250 maximum. The retail presecription benefits
change from a $8.00 and $3.00 co -pay to a three tiered plan. The co -pays for the three
tiered plan are $10.00, generic; $20.00, preferred; and $40.00, non preferred. The
Certifax mail order prescriptions for a 90 day supply are $10.00, generic; $20.00,
preferred; and $40.00, non preferred.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The HR & RM Department recommends approval of the modifications to the Self Insured Medical Plan as
noted in Exhibit 1 and 2.
EXHIBIT i
PLAN A
Firefighters, AFSCME and All Non -Represented Employees
BENEFIT PAYMENT SCHEDULE
Outpatient Physician visits, $25 co -pay* Preferred Provider
Physician ER visits then 100%; V $25 co -pay* Out -of -
Network Provider then 100%.
X-ray & Lab Fees
MRI
Medical EquipmenVMedical
Supplies/Prosthetics
100%
100% subject to $100 co -pay**
100% per provisions
Inpatient Physician Visit, 100% Preferred Provider
Skilled Nursing Facility, 100% Out -of -Network Provider up
Inpatient Medical Facility to 120 days per calendar year, then
Major Medical
Emergency Room Services $100 co -pay** then 100%
(excludes physician ER Co -pay waived for injury or life
charges) endangering conditions, or if ordered
by a physician, or if admitted
Outpatient Medical Facility
Surgeon's Fees (includes
outpatient, inpatient,
assistant surgeon and
anesthesiologist)
100%
$25 co -pay* then 100%
Second Surgical Opinion $25 co -pay* then 100%
Maternity Care
100% for employee and spouse
only paid as any illness condition.
First 48 hours of medical facility
charges for normal birth; first 96
hours for cesarean section
Newborn Nursery Care
100% during initial period of
hospital confinement
Children's Preventive Care
v $25 co -pay* then 100%
Up to age 12 ...Includes
Preferred Provider Only
routine immunizations
Adult Preventive Care $25 co -pay* then 100% to $175
$25 co -pay* for charges over $175
Preferred Provider Only
Preventive Mammograms 100% per provisions
Chiropractic Care $500 limit subject to $25 co -pay*
Preferred Provider; $25 co -pay* Out -
of -Network
Provider, then Major Medical
Home Health & Hospice 100% per provisions
Care
Allergy Injections 100%
Elective Sterilization $100 co -pay** then 100%
$400 lifetime maximum for employee
and spouse only
Ambulance V 100%
Physical/Speech/ 1 100% subject to $25 co -pay*
Occupational Therapy Preferred Provider; $25 co -pay* Out -
of -Network
Biofeedback V 1000/0
Neurodevelopmental V 100% subject to $25 co -pay*
Therapy Preferred Provider; $25 co -pay* Out -
of -Network Provider, limited to 60
visits per year, per condition, per
provisions
Chemical Dependency 1 100% subject to $25 co -pay*
Inpatient/Outpatient up to $5,000 per
24 months to $10,000 lifetime
maximum
Mental Health Treatment 50% limited to 5 days per calendar
...Inpatient year
Mental Health Treatment 100% limited to 20 visits per
...Outpatient calendar year subject to $25 co -pay*
Preferred Provider; $25 co -pay* Out -
of -Network Provider
Foot Orthotics
...Prescribed by a physician
Hearing Aids
Annual Hearing Exam
YOUR VISION BENEFITS -
vI $500 each 5 calendar years
$500 each 36 months
$25 co -pay* then 100%
Covers eye examination,
v1 $400 each 2 calendar years;
lenses, frames, contact
vision exam subject to $25 co -
lenses, and Laser Eye
pay* Preferred Provider; $25 co -
Surgery
pay* Out -of -Network Provider
*Maximum number of copays is ten (10) per person ($250 per year), or twenty five (25) copays per family
($625).
**The $100 Emergency Room (ER), MRI and Sterilization copays are not included in $250 maximum
3
YOUR PRESCRIPTION BENEFITS -
PCS retail prescription drugs
... up to 34-day supply
Certifax mail-order prescriptions
... up to 90-day supply
Co -pays
Generics $10
Preferred Brand $20
Non Preferred Brand $40
Co -pays
Generics $10
Preferred Brand $20
Non Preferred Brand $40
Prescription co -pays do not apply to the Medical Co -pay Maximums
On section 13, page 2 of the Plan Document under General Provisions, replace the APPEALING A CLAIM
language with the following language:
APPEALING A CLAIM
Post -Service Claim:
If your claim is denied in whole or in part, you will receive an Explanation of Benefits showing the calculation of
the total amount payable, charges not payable, the reason for the determination, and if applicable, a description
of any additional information needed. If additional information is needed, you may be requested to provide the
information prior to payment of your claim.
First Level: You may request a review within 180 days by filing a written appeal with the Plan Supervisor.
The written appeal must clearly state that it is an appeal, and clearly state the reason for appeal. You must
supply any additional information to support your appeal reason. The Plan Supervisor will make a decision
within 30 days. This decision will be delivered to you in writing setting forth specific references to the pertinent
Plan provision rule, protocol or guidelines upon which the decision is based. You will also be given a description
of any additional information needed to overturn the decision.
Second Level: You may request a review within 180 days by filing a written appeal with the Plan Supervisor.
The written appeal must clearly state that it is an appeal, and clearly state the reason for appeal. You must
supply any additional information to support your appeal reason. The Plan Supervisor will make a decision
within 30 days. This decision will be delivered to you in writing setting forth specific references to the pertinent
Plan provision rule, protocol or guidelines upon which the decision is based. You will also be given a description
of any additional information needed to overturn the decision.
Subsequent Action: Upon exhaustion of the full member appeals process, you have no further rights to review
of your claim. However, you are entitled to seek redress in the court system.
Pre -Service Claim:
If your Pre -Service claim (or Pre -Authorization) is denied in whole or in part, you will receive written notification of
the decision, and the reason for the determination, and if applicable, a description of any additional information
needed. If additional information is needed, you may be requested to provide the information prior to payment of
your claim.
First Level: You may request a review within 180 days by filing a written appeal with the Plan Supervisor.
The written appeal must clearly state that it is an appeal, and clearly state the reason for appeal. You must
supply any additional information to support your appeal reason. The Plan Supervisor will make a decision
within 15 days. This decision will be delivered to you in writing setting forth specific references to the pertinent
Plan provision rule, protocol or guidelines upon which the decision is based. You will also be given a description
of any additional information that will aid in making a determination.
Second Level: You may request a review within 180 days by filing a written appeal with the Plan Supervisor.
The written appeal must clearly state that it is an appeal, and clearly state the reason for appeal. You must
supply any additional information to support your appeal reason. The Plan Supervisor will make a decision
within 15 days. This decision will be delivered to you in writing setting forth specific references to the pertinent
Plan provision rule, protocol or
guidelines upon which the decision is based. You will also be given a description of any additional information
that will aid in making a determination.
Subsequent Action: Upon exhaustion of the full member appeals process, you have no further rights to review
of your claim. However, you are entitled to seek redress in the court system.
Urgent Pre -Service Claim:
Urgent Care Claims are defined as claims that involve a decision that, if treated as non -urgent, could seriously
jeopardize the claimant's life, health or ability to regain maximum function; or would, according to a physician,
subject the claimant to severe pain. If your Urgent Pre -Service claim (or Pre -Authorization) is denied in whole or
in part, you will receive verbal and written notification of the decision, and the reason for the determination, and
if applicable, a description of any additional information needed. If additional information is needed, you may be
requested to provide the information prior to payment of your claim.
First & Second Level: You may request a review within 180 days by filing a written appeal with the Plan
Supervisor. The appeal must clearly state that it is an appeal, and clearly state the reason for appeal. It is also
recommended that you supply any additional information to support your appeal reason. The Plan Supervisor will
make a decision within 72 hours to include both the First and Second level appeals. This decision will be
delivered to you verbally and in writing setting forth specific references to the pertinent Plan provision rule,
protocol or guidelines upon which the decision is based. You will also be given a description of any additional
information needed to overturn the decision.
Subsequent Action: Upon exhaustion of the full member appeals process, you have no further rights to review
of your claim. However, you are entitled to seek redress in the court system.
EXHIBIT 2
PLAN B
Police Guild and Non -Uniform Police
BENEFIT
Outpatient Physician visits,
Physician ER visits
X-ray & Lab Fees
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
$5 co -pay Preferred Provider
then 100%; v1 $15 co -pay Out -of -
Network Provider then 100%.
Limited to 35 visits/employee, 20
visits/dependent, then Major
Medical
100%
Medical Equipment/Medical 100% per provisions
Supplies/Prosthetics
Inpatient Physician Visit, 100% Preferred Provider
Skilled Nursing Facility, 100% Out -of -Network Provider
Inpatient Medical Facility up to 120 days per calendar year,
then Major Medical
Emergency Room Services
(excludes physician ER
charges)
Outpatient Medical Facility
Surgeon's Fees (includes
outpatient, inpatient,
assistant surgeon and
anesthesiologist)
$50 co -pay then 100%
Co -pay waived for injury or life
endangering conditions, or if
ordered by a physician, or if
admitted
100%
100%
Second Surgical Opinion 100%
Maternity Care 100% for employee and spouse
only paid as any illness condition.
First 48 hours of medical facility
charges for normal birth; first 96
hours for cesarean section
Newborn Nursery Care
Children's Preventive Care
Up to age 12 ...Includes
routine immunizations
Adult Preventive Care
100% during initial period of
hospital confinement
$5 co -pay then 100%
Preferred Provider Only
$5 co -pay then 100% to $175
$50 co -pay for charges over
$175
Preferred Provider Only
6
Preventive Mammograms 1 100% per provisions
Chiropractic Care
1 $500 limit subject to $5 co -pay
Preferred Provider; $15 co -pay
Out -of -Network
Provider, then Major Medical
Home Health & Hospice
100% per provisions
Care
Allergy Injections
100%
Elective Sterilization
$400 lifetime maximum for
employee and spouse only
Ambulance
V 100%
Physical/Speech/
v 100% subject to $5 co -pay
Occupational Therapy
Preferred Provider; $15 co -pay
Out -of -Network
Biofeedback
V 100%
Neurodevelopmental
v 100% subject to $5 co -pay
Therapy
Preferred Provider; $15 co -pay
Out -of -Network Provider, limited
to 60 visits per year, per
condition, per provisions
Chemical Dependency
v 100% Inpatient/Outpatient up
to $5,000 per 24 months to
$10,000 lifetime maximum
Mental Health Treatment
' 50% limited to 5 days per
...Inpatient
calendar year
Mental Health Treatment
v 100% limited to 20 visits per
...Outpatient
calendar year subject to $5 co -pay
Preferred Provider; $15 co -pay
Out -of -Network Provider
Foot Orthotics
$500 each 5 calendar years
...Prescribed by a physician
Hearing Aids
$500 each 36 months
Annual Hearing Exam
$5 co -pay then 100%
YOUR VISION BENEFITS -
Covers eye examination, $400 each 2 calendar years;
lenses, frames, contact vision exam subject to $5 co -pay
lenses, and Laser Eye Preferred Provider; $15 co -pay
Surgery Out -of -Network Provider
YOUR PRESCRIPTION BENEFITS -
PCS retail prescription drugs 11 $8 co -pay name brand
... up to 34-day supply $3 co -pay generic
Certifax mail-order prescriptions $5 co -pay name brand
... up to 90-day supply $2 co -pay generic
'n section 13, page 2 of the Plan Document under General Provisions, replace the APPEALING A CLAIM
anguage with the following language:
APPEALING A CLAIM
Post -Service Claim:
If your claim is denied in whole or in part, you will receive an Explanation of Benefits showing the calculation of
the total amount payable, charges not payable, the reason for the determination, and if applicable, a description
of any additional information needed. If additional information is needed, you may be requested to provide the
information prior to payment of your claim.
First Level: You may request a review within 180 days by filing a written appeal with the Plan Supervisor.
The written appeal must clearly state that it is an appeal, and clearly state the reason for appeal. You must
supply any additional information to support your appeal reason. The Plan Supervisor will make a decision
within 30 days. This decision will be delivered to you in writing setting forth specific references to the pertinent
Plan provision rule, protocol or guidelines upon which the decision is based. You will also be given a description
of any additional information needed to overturn the decision.
Second Level: You may request a review within 180 days by filing a written appeal with the Plan Supervisor.
The written appeal must clearly state that it is an appeal, and clearly state the reason for appeal. You must
supply any additional information to support your appeal reason. The Plan Supervisor will make a decision
within 30 days. This decision will be delivered to you in writing setting forth specific references to the pertinent
Plan provision rule, protocol or guidelines upon which the decision is based. You will also be given a description
of any additional information needed to overturn the decision.
Subsequent Action: Upon exhaustion of the full member appeals process, you have no further rights to review
of your claim. However, you are entitled to seek redress in the court system.
Pre -Service Claim:
If your Pre -Service claim (or Pre -Authorization) is denied in whole or in part, you will receive written notification of
the decision, and the reason for the determination, and if applicable, a description of any additional information
needed. If additional information is needed, you may be requested to provide the information prior to payment of
your claim.
First Level: You may request a review within 180 days by filing a written appeal with the Plan Supervisor.
The written appeal must clearly state that it is an appeal, and clearly state the reason for appeal. You must
supply any additional information to support your appeal reason. The Plan Supervisor will make a decision
within 15 days. This decision will be delivered to you in writing setting forth specific references to the pertinent
Plan provision rule, protocol or guidelines upon which the decision is based. You will also be given a description
of any additional information that will aid in making a determination.
Second Level: You may request a review within 180 days by filing a written appeal with the Plan Supervisor.
The written appeal must clearly state that it is an appeal, and clearly state the reason for appeal. You must
supply any additional information to support your appeal reason. The Plan Supervisor will make a decision
within 15 days. This decision will be delivered to you in writing setting forth specific references to the pertinent
Plan provision rule, protocol or
guidelines upon which the decision is based. You will also be given a description of any additional information
that will aid in making a determination.
Subsequent Action: Upon exhaustion of the full member appeals process, you have no further rights to review
of your claim. However, you are entitled to seek redress in the court system.
Urgent Pre -Service Claim:
Urgent Care Claims are defined as claims that involve a decision that, if treated as non -urgent, could seriously
jeopardize the claimant's life, health or ability to regain maximum function; or would, according to a physician,
subject the claimant to severe pain. If your Urgent Pre -Service claim (or Pre -Authorization) is denied in whole or
in part, you will receive verbal and written notification of the decision, and the reason for the determination, and
if applicable, a description of any additional information needed. If additional information is needed, you may be
requested to provide the information prior to payment of your claim.
First & Second Level: You may request a review within 180 days by filing a written appeal with the Plan
Supervisor. The appeal must clearly state that it is an appeal, and clearly state the reason for appeal. It is also
recommended that you supply any additional information to support your appeal reason. The Plan Supervisor will
make a decision within 72 hours to include both the First and Second level appeals. This decision will be
delivered to you verbally and in writing setting forth specific references to the pertinent Plan provision rule,
protocol or guidelines upon which the decision is based. You will also be given a description of any additional
information needed to overturn the decision.
Subsequent Action: Upon exhaustion of the full member appeals process, you have no further rights to review
of your claim. However, you are entitled to seek redress in the court system.
9
.1
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
SUBMITTING DATA:
Dept/Div/Board....... Community Services/Human Services
Staff Contact........... Karen Bergsvik X 6652
SUBJECT:
Community Development Block Grant Specialist (CDBG) —
Request to hire at Step E
EXHIBITS:
A. Memo requesting the change in status of position
B. Finance Committee report supporting change of status
Al11 #: 51 i ,
FOR AGENDA OF: ,January 6, 2003
AGENDA STATUS:
Consent ....................................... X
Public Hearing ............................
Correspondence ..........................
Ordinance ...................................
Resolution ...................................
Old Business ...............................
New Business .............................
Study Session .............................
Information .................................
Other...........................................
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approvals
Refer to Finance Committee Legal Dept .....................
Finance Dept .................. X
Other..............................
'ISCAL IMPACT:
Expenditure Required ................. Transfer/Amendment............
Amount Budgeted ....................... Revenue Generated ..............
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The City Council approved the change of the specialist position from "limited term" to "regular" status at the 9/16/02
Council meeting. The grade of the position remained at grade 18, $3,598 - $4,382. Authorization to hire at the E step
was omitted from the original request. Hiring the CDBG Contract Specialist at an "E" step requires Council approval.
The position was posted internally, and the incumbent in the position was offered the job in early December. She has
been a City employee for six years, and began in the position in October 1996. During that time she progressed from
Step A to Step E. She has been at Step E for the past two years. Changing the status of the position should not have
any effect on her rate of pay. This has no budget impact since the position is already budgeted for Step E. The CDBG
Planning and Administration allocation pays the majority of the cost of the salary and benefits; the general fund makes
up the difference (less than 10%).
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Council approve hiring the CDBG Specialist at salary step E.
c \fd e s\ d e a n n a\A GENB I I. D 1.d o c
MEMORANDUM
E3 ,�
..0
CITY OF RENTON
COMMUNITY SERVICES
0 Committed to Enriching Lives 0
TO: Jesse Tanner, Mayor
FROM: Jim Shepherd, Community Services Administra
SUBJECT: CDBG Specialist . n
DATE: July 8, 2002
am recommending that the full-time, limited term CDBG Specialist position,
currently being filled by Dianne Utecht, be made a full-time regular position.
Dianne has worked in this limited term position for nearly six years. The position
is listed in the budget as 1.0 FTE. Converting it to a regular position would not
change this and the City's overall FTE count would not be affected. The only
additional expense would be the City's contribution for her deferred
compensation. This would amount to approximately $1,000 annually.
Dianne performs a needed function administering CDBG block grant funds. She
assists in developing funding recommendations, grant applications and
contracts. She provides technical assistance for the department to agencies. As
long as the City receives these funds, these duties will need to be performed.
Dianne's position is funded mostly with CDBG funds with a small contribution
from the General Fund (less than 10%). CDBG money would remain the primary
source of funds for the position salary. I would anticipate this to be a union
position.
The position is grant dependent and focuses on administering the grants
(CDBG). If the funding source was not available, there would no longer be a
need for this position and it could simply be eliminated.
C: Jay Covington
CANly Documents\Jim 2002\cdbc.doccdbg.doc7/8/2002
FINANCE COMMITTEE
COMMITTEE REPORT
September 16, 2002
®ate
ESTABLISHMENT OF GRADE FOR NEW CRIME ANALYST POSITION
CHANGE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE VICTIM ADVOCATE AND CDBG
SPECIALIST FROM "LIMITED TERM" TO "REGULAR" STATUS.
(Referred September 9, 2002)
The Finance Committee concurs in staff s recommendation that the grade for the new Crime
Analyst position, be grade pn61 at $2,984 - $4,169 (making the base salary for a full year at Step A
,$35,808).
The Committee recommends this grade be effective September 1, 2002.
The Finance Committee concurs in staffs recommendation that the following two positions become
"regular" full-time positions. The positions are currently funded through grants and are in a "limited term"
status. If the funding sources are not available, the positions may be eliminated.
The Domestic Violence Victim Advocate grade pn60 $2,845 - $3,975 ($34,140 is base salary for a full
year at step A). The Domestic Violence Victim Advocate was in the Human Services Division of
Community Services at a grade of a14 and is being transferred to the Police Department. Staff recommends
that the current grade (al4) be established in the Police. Department, . This grade is justified through a salary
-comparison completed by Human Resources.
The CDBG Specialist current'grade is a18 $3,598 - $4;382 and staff recommends this position remain in
grade a18 and become a "regular" full-time position. This position will remain in the Human Services
Division.
The above changes, if approved, are effective September 1, 2002. These changes will not require additional
King -ark air ^
Don PerssorKVice Chair
Dan Clawson, Member
cc: Michael Webby
James Shepherd
Garry Anderson
Eileen Flott
Victoria Runkle
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
AI N:
Submitting Data: Transportation Systems
For Agenda of:
Dept/Div/Board.. Planning/Building/Public Works
January 6, 2003
Agenda Status
Staff Contact...... Leslie Lahndt, x7223
Consent ..............
Public Hearing..
Subject:
Correspondence..
South Grady Way Westbound Concrete Approach to
Ordinance .............
Rainier Avenue
Resolution............
Old Business........
New Business.......
Exhibits:
Entranco Agreement
Study Sessions......
Six -Year TIP
Information.........
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Legal Dept.........
Refer to Transportation Committee Finance Dept......
(January 16, 2003) Other ...............
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... $53,504.46 Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... $620,000 Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget $620,000 City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The westbound approach of South Grady Way to the intersection of Rainier Avenue has
experienced serious rutting and shoving of asphalt out of the wheel paths onto the adjacent C-
curb and sidewalk. As an interim fix, to keep the approach safe and open to the traveling
public, and allow time to design and construct the solution, this intersection was overlaid as
part of the 2002 Overlay Project. The solution is to construct the final approximately 550 feet
of the westbound approach of South Grady Way to Rainier Avenue with concrete. Council has
previously approved the 2003-2008 TIP, which budgeted $620,000 for the design and
construction of this project (attached). Also attached is a copy of the consultant agreement
between the City of Renton and Entranco for $53,504.46 which when executed will allow the
design of this project to commence. Construction ad is expected in April 2003.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Transportation Division staff recommends that the Council accept the Grady Way
Westbound Approach at Rainier Avenue Project and authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement
with Entranco in the amount of $53,504.46.
H:Trans/Admin/Agendabi112002/Grady Way Concrete Approach
Consultant/Address/Telephone
Local Agency
Entranco, Inc.
Standard Consultant
10900 NE 8th Street, Suite 300
Agreement
Bellevue, WA 98004
Agreement Number
(425) 454-5600
Federal Aid Number
Project Title And Work Description
South Grady Way and Rainier Avenue South -
Pavement Rehabilitation Project
Agreement Type (Choose one)
❑ Lump Sum
Lump Sum Amount $
® Cost Plus Fixed Fee
Overhead Progress Payment Rate 167 %
DBE Participation
Overhead Cost Method
❑ Yes ® No %
❑ Actual Cost
WBE Participation
❑ Actual Cost Not To Exceed
❑ Yes ® No %
Federal ID Number or Social Security Number
15
® Fixed Rate %
91-0990275
Fixed Fee $ 5,535.60
Do you require a 1099 for IRS?
Completion Date
❑ Yes ® No
December 1, 2003
❑Specific Rates Of Pay
❑ Negotiated Hourly Rate
Total Amount Authorized $ 48,640.42
❑ Provisional Hourly Rate
Management Reserve Fund $ 4,864.04
❑ Cost Per Unit of Work
Maximum Amount Payable $ 53,504.46
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this
between the Local Agency of City of Renton
day of
2002 ,
, Washington, hereinafter called the
"AGENCY", and the above organization hereinafter called the "CONSULTANT'.
WITNESSETH THAT:
WHEREAS, the AGENCY desires to accomplish the above referenced project, and
WHEREAS, the AGENCY does not have sufficient staff to meet the required commitment and therefore
deems it advisable and desirable to engage the assistance of a CONSULTANT to provide the necessary
services for the PROJECT; and
WHEREAS, the CONSULTANT represents that he/she is in compliance with the Washington State
Statutes relating to professional registration, if applicable, and has signified a willingness to furnish
Consulting services to the AGENCY,
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms, conditions, covenants and performance contained
herein, or attached and incorporated and made a part hereof, the parties hereto agree as follows:
DOT Form 140-089 EF
Revised 12/99
Page 1 of 8
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK
The work under this AGREEMENT shall consist of
the above described work and services as herein
defined and necessary to accomplish the completed
work for this PROJECT. The CONSULTANT shall
furnish all services, labor and related equipment
necessary to conduct and complete the work as
designated elsewhere in this AGREEMENT.
II
SCOPE OF WORK
The Scope of Work and project level of effort for this
project is detailed in Exhibit "B" attached hereto, and
by this reference made a part of this AGREEMENT.
III
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
All aspects of coordination of the work of this
AGREEMENT, with outside agencies, groups or
individuals shall receive advance approval by the
AGENCY. Necessary contacts and meetings with
agencies, groups or individuals shall be coordinated
through the AGENCY.
The CONSULTANT shall attend coordination,
progress and presentation meetings with the
AGENCY or such Federal, Community, State, City
or County officials, groups or individuals as may be
requested by the AGENCY. The AGENCY will
provide the CONSULTANT sufficient notice prior
to meetings requiring CONSULTANT participation.
The minimum number of hours or days notice —
required shall be agreed to between the AGENCY
and the CONSULTANT and shown in Exhibit "B"
attached hereto and made part of this AGREEMENT.
The CONSULTANT shall prepare a monthly
progress report, in a form approved by the AGENCY,
that will outline in written and graphical form the
various phases and the order of performance of the
work in sufficient detail so that the progress of the
work can easily be evaluated. Goals for Disadvan-
taged Business Enterprises (DBE) and Women
Owned Business Enterprises (WBE) if required shall
be shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT.
All reports, PS&E materials, and other data, furnished
to the CONSULTANT by the AGENCY shall be
returned. All designs, drawings, specifications,
documents, and other work products prepared by the
CONSULTANT prior to completion or termination of
this AGREEMENT are instruments of service for this
PROJECT and are property of the AGENCY. Reuse
by the AGENCY or by others acting through or on
behalf of the AGENCY of any such instruments of
service, not occurring as a part of this PROJECT,
shall be without liability or legal exposure to the
.70]►C•Y1MIUMN
IV
TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION
The CONSULTANT shall not begin any work under
the terms of this AGREEMENT until authorized in
writing by the AGENCY. All work under this
AGREEMENT shall be completed by the date
shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT under
completion date.
The established completion time shall not be extended
because of any delays attributable to the CONSULT-
ANT, but may be extended by the AGENCY, in the
event of a delay attributable to the AGENCY, or
because of unavoidable delays caused by an act of
GOD or governmental actions or other conditions
beyond the control of the CONSULTANT. A prior
supplemental agreement issued by the AGENCY is
required to extend the established completion time.
V
PAYMENT
The CONSULTANT shall be paid by the AGENCY
for completed work and services rendered under this
AGREEMENT as provided in Exhibit "C" attached
hereto, and by this reference made part of this
AGREEMENT. Such payment shall be full compen-
sation for work performed or services rendered and
for all labor, materials, supplies, equipment, and
incidentals necessary to complete the work
specified in Section II, "Scope of Work'. The
CONSULTANT shall conform with all applicable
portions of 48 CFR 31.
Page 2 of 8
VI
SUBCONTRACTING
The AGENCY permits subcontracts for those items
of work as shown in Exhibit G to this Agreement.
Compensation for this suboonsultant work shall be
based on the cost factors shown on Exhibit G, at-
tached hereto and by this reference made a part of this
AGREEMENT.
The work of the subconsultant shall not exceed its
maximum amount payable unless a prior written
approval has been issued by the AGENCY.
All reimbursable direct labor, overhead, direct non -
salary costs and fixed fee costs for the subconsultant
shall be substantiated in the same manner as outlined
in Section V. All subcontracts exceeding $10,000 in
cost shall contain all applicable provisions of this
AGREEMENT.
The CONSULTANT shall not subcontract for the
performance of any work under this AGREEMENT
without prior written permission of the AGENCY. No
permission for subcontracting shall create, between
the AGENCY and subcontractor, any contract or any
other relationship.
Vll
EMPLOYMENT
The CONSULTANT warrants that he/she has not
employed or retained any company or person, other
than a bona fide employee working solely for the
CONSULTANT, to solicit or secure this contract, and
that it has not paid or agreed to pay any company or
person, other than a bona fide employee working
solely for the CONSULTANT, any fee, commission,
percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or any other consider-
ation, contingent upon or resulting from the award or
making of this contract. For breach or violation of this
warrant, the AGENCY shall have the right to annul
this AGREEMENT without liability, or in its discre-
tion, to deduct from the AGREEMENT price or
consideration or otherwise recover the full amount of
such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift,
or contingent fee.
Any and all employees of the CONSULTANT or
other persons while engaged in the performance of
any work or services required of the CONSULTANT
under this AGREEMENT, shall be considered
employees of the CONSULTANT only and not of the
AGENCY, and any and all claims that may or might
arise under any Workmen's compensation Act on
behalf of said employees or other persons while so
engaged, and any and all claims made by a third party
as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of
the CONSULTANT's employees or other persons
while so engaged on any of the work or services
provided to be rendered herein, shall be the sole
obligation and responsibility of the CONSULTANT.
The CONSULTANT shall not engage, on a full or
part time basis, or other basis, during the period of the
contract, any professional or technical personnel who
are, or have been, at any time during the period of the
contract, in the employ of the United States Depart-
ment of Transportation, the STATE, or the
AGENCY, except regularly retired employees,
without written consent of the public employer of
such person.
Vill
NONDISCRIMINATION
The CONSULTANT agrees not to discriminate
against any client, employee or applicant for employ-
ment or for services because of race, creed, color,
national origin, marital status, sex, age or handicap
except for a bona fide occupational qualification with
regard to, but not limited to the following: employ-
ment upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment or
any recruitment advertising, a layoff or terminations,
rates of pay or other forms of compensation; selection
for training, rendition of services. The CONSULT-
ANT understands and agrees that if it violates this
provision, this AGREEMENT may be terminated by
the AGENCY and further that the CONSULTANT
shall be barred from performing any services for the
AGENCY now or in the future unless a showing is
made satisfactory to the AGENCY that discrimina-
tory practices have terminated and that recurrence of
such action is unlikely.
During the performance of this AGREEMENT, the
CONSULTANT, for itself, its assignees and
successors in interest agrees as follows:
A. COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATIONS: The
CONSULTANT shall comply with the Regula-
tions relative to nondiscrimination in the same
manner as in Federal -assisted programs of the
Page 3 of 8
Department of Transportation, Title 49, Code of
Federal Regulations, Part 21, as they may be
amended from time to time, (hereinafter referred
to as the Regulations), which are herein incorpo-
rated by reference and made a part of this
AGREEMENT. The consultant shall comply
with the American Disabilities Act of 1992, as
amended.
B. NONDISCRIMINATION: The CONSULTANT,
with regard to the work performed by it during the
AGREEMENT, shall not discriminate on the
grounds of race, creed, color, sex, age, marital
status, national origin or handicap except for a
bona fide occupational qualification in the selec-
tion and retention of subconsultants, including
procurements of materials and leases of equip-
ment. The CONSULTANT shall not participate
either directly or indirectly in the discrimination
prohibited by Section 21.5 of the Regulations,
including employment practices when the contract
covers a program set forth in Appendix II of the
Regulations.
C. SOLICITATIONS FOR SUBCONSULTANTS,
INCLUDING PROCUREMENTS OF MATERI-
ALS AND EQUIPMENT: In all solicitations
either by competitive bidding or negotiation made
by the CONSULTANT for work to be performed
under a subcontract, including procurements of
materials or leases of equipment, each potential
subconsultant or supplier shall be notified by the
CONSULTANT of the CONSULTANT's
obligations under this AGREEMENT and the
Regulations relative to nondiscrimination on the
grounds of race, creed, color, sex, age, marital
status, national origin and handicap.
D. INFORMATION AND REPORTS: The
CONSULTANT shall provide all information
and reports required by the Regulations, or
directives issued pursuant thereto, and shall
permit access to its books, records, accounts,
other sources of information, and its facilities as
may be determined by the AGENCY to be
pertinent to ascertain compliance with such
Regulations or directives. Where any information
required of the CONSULTANT is in the exclu-
sive possession of another who fads or refuses to
furnish this information the CONSULTANT shall
so certify to the AGENCY, or the United States
Department of Transportation as appropriate, and
shall set forth what efforts it has made to obtain
the information.
E. SANCTIONS FOR NONCOMPLIANCE: In the
event of the CONSULTANT's noncompliance
with the nondiscrimination provisions of this
AGREEMENT, the AGENCY shall impose
such sanctions as it or the Federal Highway
Administration may determine to be appropriate,
including, but not limited to:
1. Withholding of payments to the CONSULT-
ANT under the AGREEMENT until the
CONSULTANT complies, and/or
2. Cancellation, termination or suspension of the
AGREEMENT, in whole or in part.
F. INCORPORATION OF PROVISIONS: The
CONSULTANT shall include the provisions of
paragraphs (A) through (G) in every subcontract,
including procurements of materials and leases of
equipment, unless exempt by the Regulations or
directives issued pursuant thereto. The CON-
SULTANT shall take such action with respect to
any subconsultant or procurement as the
AGENCY or the Federal Highway Administra-
tion may direct as a means of enforcing such
provisions including sanctions for noncompli-
ance; provided, however, that, in the event a
CONSULTANT becomes involved in, or is
threatened with, litigation with a subconsultant or
supplier as a result of such direction, the CON-
ULTANT may request the AGENCY to enter '
into such litigation to protect the interests of the
AGENCY, and in addition, the CONSULTANT
may request the United States to enter into such
litigation to protect the interests of the United
States.
G. UNFAIR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES: The
CONSULTANT shall comply with RCW
49.60.180.
Page 4 of 8
In the event of the death of any member, partner or
IX
TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
The right is reserved by the AGENCY to terminate
this AGREEMENT at any time upon ten days written
notice to the CONSULTANT.
In the event this AGREEMENT is terminated by the
AGENCY other than for default on the part of the
CONSULTANT, a final payment shall be made to the
CONSULTANT as shown in Exhibit F for the type of
AGREEMENT used.
No payment shall be made for any work completed
after ten days following receipt by the CONSULT-
ANT of the Notice to.terminate. If the accumulated
payment made to the CONSULTANT prior to Notice
of Termination exceeds the total amount that would
be due computed as set forth herein above, then no
final payment shall be due and the CONSULTANT
shall immediately reimburse the AGENCY for any
excess paid.
If the services of the CONSULTANT are terminated
by the AGENCY for default on the part of the CON-
SULTANT, the above formula for payment shall not
apply. In such an event, the amount to be paid shall be
determined by the AGENCY with consideration
given to the actual costs incurred by the CONSULT-
ANT in performing the work to the date of
termination, the amount of work originally required
which was satisfactorily completed to date of termina-
tion, whether that work is in a form or a type which is
usable to the AGENCY at the time of termination;
the cost to the AGENCY of employing another firm
to complete the work required and the time which
maybe required to do so, and other factors which
affect the value to the AGENCY of the work per-
formed at the time of termination. Under no
circumstances shall payment made under this subsec-
tion exceed the amount which would have been made
using the formula set forth in the previous paragraph.
If it is determined for any reason that the CONSULT-
ANT was not in default or that the CONSULTANT's
failure to perform is without it or it's employee's fault
or negligence, the termination shall be deemed to be a
termination for the convenience of the AGENCY in
accordance with the provision of this AGREEMENT.
officer of the CONSULTANT or any of its supervi-
sory personnel assigned to the project, or, dissolution
of the partnership, termination of the corporation, or
disaffiliation of the principally involved employee,
the surviving members of the CONSULTANT hereby -
agree to complete the work under the terms of this
AGREEMENT, if requested to do so by the
AGENCY. The subsection shall not be a bar to
renegotiation of the AGREEMENT between the
surviving members of the CONSULTANT and the
AGENCY, if the AGENCY so chooses.
In the event of the death of any of the parties listed in
the previous paragraph, should the surviving members
of the CONSULTANT, with the AGENCY's concur-
rence, desire to terminate this AGREEMENT,
payment shall be made as set forth in the second
paragraph of this section.
Payment for any part of the work by the AGENCY
shall not constitute a waiver by the AGENCY of any
remedies of any type it may have against the CON-
SULTANT for any breach of this AGREEMENT by
the CONSULTANT, or for failure of the CONSULT-
ANT to perform work required of it by the
AGENCY. Forbearance of any rights under the
AGREEMENT will not constitute waiver of entitle-
ment to exercise those rights with respect to any
future act or omission by the CONSULTANT.
X
CHANGES OF WORK
The CONSULTANT shall make such changes and
revisions in the complete work of this AGREEMENT
as necessary to correct errors appearing therein, when
required to do so by the AGENCY, without additional
compensation thereof. Should the AGENCY find it
desirable for its own purposes to have previously
satisfactorily completed work or parts thereof
changed or revised, the CONSULTANT shall make
such revisions as directed by the AGENCY. This
work shall be considered as Extra Work and will be
paid for as herein provided under Section XIV.
Page 5 of 8
XI
DISPUTES
Any dispute concerning questions of fact in connec-
tion with the work not disposed of by AGREEMENT
between the CONSULTANT and the AGENCY shall
be referred for determination to the Director of Public
Works or AGENCY Engineer, whose decision in the
matter shall be final and binding on the parties of this
AGREEMENT, provided however, that K an action is
brought challenging the Director of Public Works or
AGENCY Engineer's decision, that decision shall be
subject to de novo judicial review.
XII
VENUE, APPLICABLE LAW AND
PERSONAL JURISDICTION
In the event that either party deems it necessary to
institute legal action or proceedings to enforce any
right or obligation under this AGREEMENT, the
parties hereto agree that any such action shall be
initiated in the Superior court of the State of Washing-
ton, situated in the county the AGENCY is located in.
The parties hereto agree that all questions shall be
resolved by application of Washington law and that
the parties to such action shall have the right of appeal
from such decisions of the Superior court in ac oor-
dance with the laws of the State of Washington. The
CONSULTANT hereby consents to the personal
jurisdiction of the Superior court of the State of
Washington, situated in the county in which the
AGENCY is located in.
XIII
LEGAL RELATIONS AND INSURANCE
The CONSULTANT shall comply with all Federal,
State, and local laws and ordinances applicable to the
work to be done under this AGREEMENT. This
AGREEMENT shall be interpreted and construed in
accord with the laws of Washington.
The CONSULTANT shall indemnify and hold the
AGENCY and the STATE, and their officers and
employees harmless from and shall process and
defend at its own expense all claims, demands, or
suits at law or equity arising in whole or in part from
the CONSULTANT's negligence or breach of any of
its obligations under this AGREEMENT, provided
that nothing herein shall require a CONSULTANT to
indemnify the AGENCY and the STATE against and
hold harmless the AGENCY and the STATE from
claims, demands or suits based solely upon the
conduct of the AGENCY and the STATE, their
agents, officers and employees and provided further
that if the claims or suits are caused by or result from
the concurrent negligence of (a) the
CONSULTANT's agents or employees and (b) the
AGENCY and the STATE, their agents, officers and
employees, this indemnity provision with respect to
(1) claims or suits based upon such negligence, (2) the
costs to the AGENCY and the STATE of defending
such claims and suits, etc. shall be valid and enforce-
able only to the extent of the CONSULTANT's
negligence or the negligence of the CONSULTANT's
agents or employees.
The CONSULTANT's relation to the AGENCY shall
be at all times as an independent contractor.
The CONSULTANT specifically assumes potential
liability for actions brought by the CONSULTANTs
own employees against the AGENCY and, solely for
the purpose of this indemnification and defense, the
CONSULTANT specifically waives any immunity
under the state industrial insurance law, Title 51
RCW. The CONSULTANT recognizes that this
waiver was specifically entered into pursuant to the
provisions of RCW 4.24.115 and was the subject of
mutual negotiation.
Unless otherwise specified in the AGREEMENT, the
AGENCY shall be responsible for administration of
construction contracts, if any, on the project. Subject
to the processing of an acceptable, supplemental
agreement, the CONSULTANT shall provide on -call
assistance to the AGENCY during contract adminis-
tration. By providing such assistance, the
CONSULTANT shall assume no responsibility for:
proper construction techniques, job site safety, or any
construction contractor's failure to perform its work
in accordance with the contract documents.
The CONSULTANT shall obtain and keep in force
during the terms of the AGREEMENT, or as other-
wise required, the following insurance with
companies or through sources approved by the State
Insurance Commissioner pursuant to RCW 48.
Page 6 of 8
Insurance Coverage
A Worker's compensation and employer's liability
insurance as required by the STATE.
B. General commercial liability insurance in an
amount not less than a single limit of one million
and 00/100 Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for bodily
injury, including death and property damage
per occurrence.
Excepting the Worker's Compensation insurance and
any professional liability insurance secured by the
CONSULTANT, the AGENCY will be named on all
certificates of insurance as an additional insured. The
CONSULTANT shall furnish the AGENCY with
verification of insurance and endorsements required
by this AGREEMENT. The AGENCY reserves the
right to require complete, certified copies of all
required insurance policies at any time.
All insurance shall be obtained from an insurance
company authorized to do business in the State of
Washington. The CONSULTANT shall submit a
verification of insurance as outlined above within
14 days of the execution of this AGREEMENT to
the AGENCY.
No cancellation of the foregoing policies shall be
effective without thirty (30) days prior notice to
the AGENCY.
The CONSULTANT's professional liability to the
AGENCY shall be limited to the amount payable
under this AGREEMENT or one million dollars,
whichever is the greater unless modified by
Exhibit H. In no case shall the CONSULTANT's
professional liability to third parties be limited in
any way.
The AGENCY will pay no progress payments
under Section V until the CONSULTANT has fully
complied with this section. This remedy is not exclu-
sive; and the AGENCY and the STATE may take
such other action as is available to them under other
provisions of this AGREEMENT, or otherwise in law.
XIV
EXTRA WORK
A. The AGENCY may at any time, by written order,
make changes within the general scope of the
AGREEMENT in the services to be performed.
B. If any such change causes an increase or decrease
in the estimated cost of, or the time required for,
performance of any part of the work under this
AGREEMENT, whether or not changed by the
order, or otherwise affects any other terms and
conditions of the AGREEMENT, the AGENCY
shall make an equitable adjustment in the
(1) maximum amount payable; (2) delivery or
completion schedule, or both; and (3) other
affected terms and shall modify the AGREE-
MENT accordingly.
C. The CONSULTANT must submit its "request
for equitable adjustment" (hereafter referred to
as claim) under this clause within 30 days from
the date of receipt of the written order. However,
if the AGENCY decides that the facts justify it,
the AGENCY may receive and act upon a claim
submitted before final payment of the
AGREEMENT.
D. Failure to agree to any adjustment shall be a
dispute under the Disputes clause. However
nothing in this clause shall excuse the CON-
SULTANT from proceeding with the
AGREEMENT as changed.
E. Notwithstanding the terms and condition of
paragraphs (a) and (b) above, the maximum
amount payable for this AGREEMENT, shall
not be increased or considered to be increased
except by specific written supplement to this
AGREEMENT.
XV
ENDORSEMENT OF PLANS
The CONSULTANT shall place his endorsement on
all plans, estimates or any other engineering data
furnished by him.
Page 7 of 8
XVI
FEDERAL AND STATE REVIEW
XVI11
COMPLETE AGREEMENT
The Federal Highway Administration and the
Washington State Department of Transportation
shall have the right to participate in the review or
examination of the work in progress.
XVII
CERTIFICATION OF THE CONSULTANT
AND THE AGENCY
Attached hereto as Exhibit "A-1", are the
Certifications of the Consultant and the Agency,
Exhibit "A-2" Certification regarding debarment,
suspension and other responsibility matters - primary
covered transactions, Exhibit "A-3" Certification
regarding the restrictions of the use of Federal funds
for lobbying, and Exhibit "A-4" Certficate of Current
Cost or Pricing Data. Exhibits "A-3" and "A-4" are
only required in Agreements over $100,000.
This document and referenced attachments contains
all covenants, stipulations and provisions agreed upon
by the parties. No agent, or representative of either
party has authority to make, and the parties shall not
be bound by or be liable for, any statement, represen-
tation, promise or agreement not set forth herein. No
changes, amendments, or modifications of the terms
hereof shall be valid unless reduced to writing and
signed by the parties as an amendment to this
AGREEMENT.
XIX
EXECUTION AND ACCEPTANCE
This AGREEMENT may be simultaneously executed
in several counterparts, each of which shall be
deemed to be an original having identical legal effect.
The CONSULTANT does hereby ratify and adopt all
statements, representations, warranties, covenants,
and agreements contained in the proposal, and the
supporting materials submitted by the CONSULT-
ANT, and does hereby accept the AGREEMENT and
agrees to all of the terms and conditions thereof.
In witness whereof, the parties hereto have executed this AGREEMENT as of the day and year first
above written.
By By
Consultant Rick Della Agency City of Renton
Page 8 of 8
I hereby certify that I am
representative of the firm of
Exhibit A-1
Certification Of Consultant
Rick Della
Entranco, Inc.
10900 NE, 8th Street, Bellevue WA 98103
firm I here represent has:
Project No.
Local Agency City of Renton
and duly authorized
whose address is
and that neither I nor the above
(a) Employed or retained for a commission, percentage, brokerage, contingent fee or other consideration, any
firm or person (other than a bona fide employee working solely for me or the above CONSULTANT) to
solicit or secure this contract.
(b) Agreed, as an express or implied condition for obtaining this contract, to employ or to retain the services of
any firm or person in connection with carrying out the contract.
(c) Paid, or agreed to pay, to any firm, organization or person (other than a bona fide employee working solely
for me or the above CONSULTANT) any fee, contribution donation or consideration of any kind for, or in
connection with procuring or carrying out the contract; except as here expressly stated (if any):
I further certify that the firm I hereby represent is authorized to do business in the State of Washington and
that the firm is in full compliance with the requirements of the board of Professional Registration.
I acknowledge that this certificate is to be available to the State Department of Transportation and the Federal
Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, in connection with this contract involving
participation of Federal aid funds and is subject to applicable State and Federal laws, both criminal and civil.
// -Z?-0 2 _
Date Signature
Certification of Agency Official
I hereby certify that I am the AGENCY Official of the Local Agency of
City of Renton Washington
and that the above consulting firm or their representative has not been required, directly or indirectly as an
express or implied condition in connection with obtaining or carrying out this contract to:
(a) Employ or retain, or agree to employ or retain, any firm or person, or
(b) Pay or agree to pay to any firm, person or organization, any fee, contribution, donation or consideration of
any kind, except as here expressly stated (if any).
I acknowledged that this certificate is to be available to the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation, in connection with this contract involving participation of Federal aid highway funds and it
subject to applicable State and Federal laws, both criminal and civil.
Date Signature
Exhibit A-2
Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility
Matters -Primary Covered Transactions
1. The prospective primary participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its
principals:
(a) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily
excluded from covered transactions by any federal department or agency;
(b) Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment
rendered against them for commission or fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining,
attempting to obtain, or performing a public (federal, state, or local) transaction or contract under a public
transaction; violation of federal or state antitrust statues or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery,
bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property;
(c) Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (federal,
state, or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph Lb. of this certification;
and
(d) Have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more public
transactions (federal, state, or local) terminated for cause or default.
2. Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification,
such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal.
Consultant (Firm): Entranco, Inc.
(Date) (Signature) President or Authorised Official of Consultant
FINAL
EXHIBIT B-1
Scope of Services
South Grady Way and Rainier Avenue South
Pavement Rehabilitation Project
Renton, Washington
This project consists of designing a Portland cement concrete roadway to rehabilitate the existing
asphalt pavement under the westbound lanes on the east leg (South Grady Way) at the intersection of
South Grady Way and Rainier Avenue South. The project includes replacing existing asphalt
concrete pavement (ACP) with new Portland cement concrete (PCC) pavement, and replacement of
existing channelization.
The work will be conducted in two phases:
• Phase One: Preliminary Engineering
• Phase Two: Construction Engineering
The Preliminary Engineering phase is expected to begin in November 2002 and be completed by April
2003. Optional services provided during the Construction Engineering phase are expected to begin in
April 2003 and be completed by August 2003.
The Consultant will provide professional services for the preparation of contract plans, contract
specifications, and opinions of cost to reconstruct South Grady Way, as detailed below.
I. TASK DESCRIPTIONS
A. PHASE ONE - PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING
1. Project Administration
The project manager will be responsible to the City to ensure that the design is completed on
schedule, is technically competent, and meets the City's needs and expectations. The project
manager will provide overall project management including direction and monitoring of sub -
consultants, coordination with the City, progress reports, and invoicing. The project manager will
also initiate appropriate quality assurance and control procedures.
2. Survey
a. Field Survey. Establish 2 permanent benchmarks within the project limits. Conduct control
survey throughout the project limits locating existing monuments along South Grady Way and
intersection monument at Rainier Avenue South, and establish control points for topographic
survey. Conduct a topographic survey of the westbound lanes of South Grady Way from the
north back of sidewalk to center line of South Grady Way and from the east curb line
(extended) of Rainier Avenue South to the eastern limits of the recent overlay (approximately
530'), locating surface features of underground utilities, overhead utilities, pavement limits
and elevations, and other visible improvements within the project limits.
b. Utility Surveys. Perform additional field surveys to locate utilities that may conflict with
rehabilitation alternatives. Emphasis will be on determining the vertical location of the
potential conflicting utilities by measure -downs at vaults or from surface valves. If additional
CATEMP\Grady Scope 11-20-02.DOC ENTRANCO
November 20. 2002
FINAL
information is needed, pot holing will be authorized as Extra Work, and a vactor truck will be
used to create small diameter pot holes to locate sub -surface features.
Data Transfer/Base Mapping. Transfer field data to MicroStation mapping system, including
cross-section data; integrate with property boundary, right-of-way, and utility data; and prepare
1 inch = 20 foot base sheets. Right-of-way location shall be limited to manually scaling of
existing City maps and/or County Assessor maps, whichever is judged more accurate. All
surveying and Computer Aided Drafting (CAD) work will be done in accordance with City of
Renton survey and CAD standards.
3. Geotechnical
a. Review Existing Subsurface Information. Review existing soils information available from the
City, with particular emphasis on soils types and conditions contributing to pavement
deterioration. Visit project site to observe field conditions.
b. Perform Field Explorations. Provide up to three borings (or test pits) with depths up to four feet.
Conduct two sieve and moisture content analyses to determine soil properties for pavement
design, and to determine potential benefits and locations of underdrain facilities.
c. Geotechnical Data. Compile field exploration information consisting of boring logs, moisture
data, and sieve analysis results for use in pavement design. Prepare a 1-2 page summary
documenting geotechnical review, evaluation, and final design criteria.
4. Utility Impact Assessment
a. Data Collection. Compile and review existing utility information obtained from the City and
other utility owners.
b. Utility Coordination. Contact utilities to determine potential for future projects that would
damage the proposed new pavement. Identify ways to incorporate future utility needs, if any,
into the pavement rehabilitation plans.
c. Utility Impact Assessment and Alternative Evaluation. Compile utility information on base
maps. Assess impacts to utilities from proposed pavement rehabilitation. Identify actions
needed to address utility conflicts.
5. Data Collection and Review
Conduct field reconnaissance. Compile and review existing roadway data, pavement information,
record drawings, and traffic data provided by the City. If truck counts are not already available,
estimate the volume of Equivalent Single Axle Loads (ESALs) using the roadway, based on existing
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes.
6. Plans, Specifications, and Estimate
Prepare final design and plans, Contract Provisions, and Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction
Cost for the alternative selected by the City.
a. Plans. Prepare plans with such provisions and in such detail as to permit convenient layout in
the field for construction and other purposes. The plans will be prepared in City of Renton
r\Renton — Grady Way Pavement\Grady Scope.doc 2 of 6 ENTRANCO
November 20, 2002
FINAL
format to the level of competency presently maintained by practicing professionals in the field
of transportation engineering in the Puget Sound Region.
Plans will include details for the construction of the proposed improvements including details
for paving, concrete curb and gutter, modification of the existing storm drainage system
(including replacing four existing structures), utility adjustments, channelization, and signing.
Note that at this time no walls are anticipated as necessary for the project.
Prepare plans in ink or equivalent on 22-inch by 34-inch mylar sheets per City of Renton
CAD standards. The horizontal scale for the plan and profile plans will be 1 inch = 20 feet,
except as noted. The vertical scale will be 1 inch = 5 feet. At this time, a total of 12 plan
sheets, (based on two base sheets) are anticipated as necessary to accomplish the project.
Specific plans are anticipated to consist of.
(1) Title and Index sheet including project title and number, vicinity map, sheet index, and
general notes (1 sheet)
(2) Standard legend, symbols, abbreviations, and Survey Control (1 sheet, NTS)
(3) Typical roadway cross -sections (1 sheet, not to scale)
(4) Site preparation/erosion control plans (2 sheets).
Site preparation and erosion control plans will describe limits of paving removal and
grading limits as well as providing an erosion control plan. This plan will be utilized in
permit submittals to describe the project erosion control plan. At this time, no
sedimentation ponds are anticipated during construction of the project.
(5) Paving, Grading, and Drainage plans (2 sheets).
These plans will include horizontal alignment information, paving limits, limits of cut/fill
required, and underdrain systems. Also included will be reconstruction of the existing
drainage system to replace four existing drainage structures and about 200 lineal feet of 8-
inch concrete pipe with 12-inch pipe. It is assumed that the reconstruction will occur in
the same location as the existing system, and that no water quality or detention systems
will be required. It is also assumed that all other existing drainage pipes will be retained
and attached to the new structures. Elevation and pipe slope information for all existing
drainage laterals will be shown on the plans while the elevation and pipe slope
information for any new or existing longitudinal drainage lines will be shown on the
drainage profiles.
(6) Roadway and drainage profiles (2 sheets)
Assemble roadway and drainage profiles. Drainage profiles will be for the longitudinal
lines only and be shown in the same view as the roadway profiles. These drainage profiles
will provide information on drainage structure types, rim elevations, and invert
elevations. Design slopes between drainage structures will be shown here, and not on the
plans. No profiles will be prepared for the laterals.
(7) Channelization, signing, and illumination plans. (1 sheet, 1 "= 50' scale)
Develop channelization and signing plans that illustrate project channelization. It is
assumed that no new illumination will be required.
(8) Roadway details (2 sheets, not to scale)
Develop roadway, erosion control and drainage detail sheets which include miscellaneous
details not covered by standard plans. Standard plans will be utilized to the maximum
rWenton — Grady Way Pavement\Grady Scope.doc 3 of 6 ENTRANCO
November 20, 2002
FINAL
extent possible. Standard plan details will be exhibited on 8-1/2" x I I" pages attached to
the Contract Provisions and will not be included in the contract plan set.
All of the above plan sheets will be labeled, cross referenced and compiled into a complete set of
contract plans to be used to advertise the project for construction.
b. Contract Provisions. Prepare Contract Special Provisions for the project. These will include
Special Provisions for the items of work which are not covered by the 2002 WSDOT/ APWA
Standard Specifications, including the Division 1-99 APWA Supplement, and including any
Agency General Requirements, and bid and Contract forms. Agency will furnish examples of the
Contract Documents to Consultant, and will prepare the "boilerplate" elements of the Contract
Specifications.
c. Opinion of Probable Construction Cost. Calculate quantities, prepare bid items and
quantities for contract proposal and opinion of construction costs based upon the approved
construction plans, and current unit bid prices.
Any cost estimates provided by the Consultant will be on a basis of experience and judgment, but
since it has no control over market conditions or bidding procedures the Consultant cannot
warrant that bids or ultimate construction costs will not vary from these cost estimates.
7. Bidding Assistance
The Consultant will be available to answer questions during the bidding of the contract. This
work will include preparing addenda if necessary and evaluating the contractor bids and making a
recommendation to award if asked by the City. Because of the unknown nature of this task, it will
be restricted to the hours shown in the fee section.
8. Permitting Assistance
The Consultant will prepare a draft "no effect' letter for submission to the City. The City will
coordinate with all regulatory agencies. It is assumed that no other permits or environmental
documentation is required.
B. PHASE TWO - CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (OPTIONAL)
The following is a generic scope of work for Construction Engineering Services. Nothing has been
included in the budget for these services at this time. If the City desires to include any or all of these
services, they will be authorized as Extra Work.
1. Attend Pre -Construction Conference.
2. Provide administration of the contract during construction of the project, including:
• Participate in project meetings.
• Respond to requests for information, plan interpretation, and/or changes.
r\Renton - Grady Way Pavement\Grady Scope.doc 4 of 6 ENTRANCO
November 20. 2002
FINAL
3. Submittal Review
Review or cause to be reviewed shop drawings, samples, traffic control plans, test reports, and
other data submitted by the Contractor for compliance with the requirements of the contract
documents.
4. Site Visits
Make bi-weekly site visits (up to 8 assumed) to observe the construction work in progress for
general compliance with design.
S. Final Review
Conduct final review and ascertain if the work has been performed in accordance with the contract
documents, including response to property owner concerns during the final review. Work with City to
prepare punch list of items to be completed.
6. Final Records
Provide final records and draft Record Drawings, per City of Renton Standards, to show
construction changes as provided by the Contractor. Record drawings will be in red ink on mylar.
Record drawing information will not be recorded on electronic files, unless specifically requested
in the Extra Work Agreement for Construction Engineering.
Consultant shall not be responsible for construction means, methods, techniques, sequences of
procedures, or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the work performed by the
contractor(s) and any subcontractors.
II. DESIGN CRITERIA
The City will designate the basic premises and criteria for the design. Reports and plans, to the extent
feasible, will be developed in accordance with the latest edition and amendments as of the date of signing
of this Agreement, of the following documents. Changes in any design standards or requirements after
work has begun may result in Extra Work.
Measurements will be in English units.
Drafting Standard: WSDOT/APWA
Datum: Horizontal: City of Renton NAD-83(91)
Vertical: City of Renton N.G.V.D. of 1988
1. WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines (LAG)
2. WSDOT Design Manual
3. AASHTO (1990 Edition)
4. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD)
5. City of Renton Standard Plans and Specifications
6. APWA and WSDOT Standard Plans and Specifications (English version, 2002)
7. City and County Design Standards (WSDOT, 1994)
8. AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures (1993)
III.DOCUMENTS FURNISHED BY CONSULTANT TO CITY
The following documents, exhibits or other presentations for the work covered by this Agreement
("Documents") shall be furnished by Consultant to City upon completion of the various phases of the work.
Whether the Documents are submitted in electronic media or in tangible format, any use of the Documents
rWenton — Grady Way Pavement\Grady Scope.doc 5 of 6 ENTRANCO
November 20, 2002
on another project or on extensions of this project beyond the use for which they were intended, or any
modification of the Documents, or conversion of the Documents to an alternate system or format shall be
without liability or legal exposure to Consultant; City shall assume all risks associated with such use,
modifications, or conversions. Consultant may remove from the electronic Documents delivered to City all
references to Consultant's involvement and will retain a tangible copy of the Documents delivered to City
which shall govern the interpretation of the Documents and the information recorded. Electronic files are
considered working files only --Consultant is not required to maintain electronic files beyond 90 days after
project final billing, and makes no warranty as to the viability of electronic files beyond 90 days from date
of transmittal.
Two (2) copies of the opinion of cost at the 30 percent, 90 percent and 100 percent design
submittals.
Five (5) sets of all sheets (at half-size, [11" x 17"] on bond paper) comprising the set of
project plans for City review at the 30, 90 and 100 percent completion stage.
Two (2) copies of the specifications for City review at the 90 and 100 percent design
One (1) copy of survey control data.
One (1) copy of the geotechnical summary report and data sheets.
One (1) set of 1"=20' scale "full-size" Contract Plans on vellum.
Forty (40) sets of Contract Documents for distribution by the City (Contract Specifications
and 11" x 17" Contract Plans, on bond paper).
One (1) set of record drawing mylars for use by the City (as part of Phase II).
IV. ITEMS FURNISHED BY CITY TO CONSULTANT
City will provide the following items and services to Consultant that will facilitate the preparation of the
plans and studies within the limits of the project. Consultant is entitled to rely on the accuracy and
completeness of the data furnished by others, including but not limited to, survey and traffic data.
Any available record drawings and information on public works projects in the project area.
Any available information pertaining to existing survey monumentation and bench marks.
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes, with truck classifications if available. This
information will be utilized for the project's pavement design.
Existing right-of-way information within the project route.
Consolidation of all review comments onto one copy of each submittal.
The City will advertise the project, and distribute Bid Documents.
Rights -of -entry upon all lands necessary for the performance of the work will be obtained by
,I-- ! -
Payment of all review and/or permit fees.
Pot -holing for utility locations (if existing data is insufficient for design purposes).
Title reports for affected properties (if required).
Right-of-way negotiation and acquisition (if required).
ENTRANCO
November 20, 2002
Exhibit C-2
Payment
(Cost Plus Fixed Fee)
The CONSULTANT shall be paid by the AGENCY for completed work and services rendered under this
AGREEMENT as provided hereinafter. Such payment shall be full compensation for all work performed or
services rendered and for all labor, materials, equipment, and incidentals necessary to complete the work
specified in Section II, "Scope of Work." The CONSULTANT shall conform with the applicable portion of 48
CFR 31.
A. Actual Costs
Payment for all consulting services for this project shall be on the basis of the CONSULTANT's actual cost
plus a fixed fee. The actual cost shall include direct salary cost, overhead, and direct nonsalary cost.
1. Direct Salary Costs
The direct salary cost is the direct salary paid to principals, professional, technical, and clerical personnel
for the time they are productively engaged in work necessary to fulfill the terms of this AGREEMENT.
2. Overhead Costs
Overhead costs are those costs other than direct costs which are included as such on the books of the
CONSULTANT in the normal everyday keeping of its books. Progress payments shall be made at the
rate shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT, under "Overhead Progress Payment Rate." Total
overhead payment shall be based on the method shown in the heading of the AGREEMENT. The three
options are explained as follows:
a. Actual Cost Not To Exceed Maximum Percent: If this method is indicated in the heading of this
AGREEMENT, the AGENCY agrees to reimburse the CONSULTANT at the actual overhead rate
verified by audit up to the maximum percentage shown in the space provided. Final overhead payment
when accumulated with all other actual costs shall not exceed the total maximum amount payable
shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT.
b. Fixed Rate: If this method is indicated in the heading of the AGREEMENT, the AGENCY agrees to
reimburse the CONSULTANT for overhead at the percentage rate shown. This rate shall not change
during the life of the AGREEMENT.
A summary of the CONSULTANT's cost estimate and the overhead computation are attached hereto as
Exhibit D-1 and by this reference made part of this AGREEMENT. When an Actual Cost method, or the
Actual Cost Not To Exceed method is used, the CONSULTANT (prime and all subconsultants) will
submit to the AGENCY within three months after the end of each firm's fiscal year, an overhead
schedule in the format required by the AGENCY (cost category, dollar expenditures, etc.) for the purpose
of adjusting the overhead rate for billing purposes. It shall be used for the computation of progress
payments during the following year and for retroactively adjusting the previous year's overhead cost to
reflect the actual rate.
Failure to supply this information by either the prime consultant or any of the subconsultants shall
cause the agency to withhold payment of the billed overhead costs until such time as the required
information is received and an overhead rate for billing purposes is approved.
The STATE and/or the Federal Government may perform an audit of the CONSULTANT's books and
records at any time during regular business hours to determine the actual overhead rate, if they so desire.
3. Direct Nonsalary Costs
Direct nonsalary costs will be reimbursed at the actual cost to the CONSULTANT. These charges may
include, but are not limited to the following items: travel, printing, long distance telephone, supplies,
computer charges, and fees of subconsultants. Air or train travel will only be reimbursed to economy class
levels unless otherwise approved by the AGENCY. Automobile mileage for travel will be reimbursed at
the current rate approved for AGENCY employees and shall be supported by the date and time of each trip
with origin and destination of such trips. Subsistence and lodging expenses will be reimbursed at the same
rate as for AGENCY employees. The billing for nonsalary cost, directly identifiable with the Project, shall
be an itemized listing of the charges supported by copies of original bills, invoices, expense accounts, and
miscellaneous supporting data retained by the CONSULTANT. Copies of the original supporting
documents shall be provided to the AGENCY upon request. All of the above charges must be necessary
for the services to be provided under this AGREEMENT.
4. Fixed Fee
The fixed fee, which represents the CONSULTANT's profit, is shown in the heading of this
AGREEMENT under Fixed Fee. This amount does not include any additional fixed fee which could be
authorized from the Management Reserve Fund. This fee is based on the scope of work defined in this
AGREEMENT and the estimated man -months required to perform the stated scope of work. In the event
a supplemental agreement is entered into for additional work by the CONSULTANT, the supplemental
agreement may include provisions for the added costs and an appropriate additional fee. The fixed fee will
be prorated and paid monthly in proportion to the percentage of work completed by the CONSULTANT
and reported in the monthly progress reports accompanying the invoices.
Any portion of the fixed fee earned but not previously paid in the progress payments will be covered in the
final payment, subject to the provisions of Section IX, Termination of Agreement.
5. Management Reserve Fund
The AGENCY may desire to establish a Management Reserve Fund to provide the Agreement
Administrator the flexibility of authorizing additional funds to the AGREEMENT for allowable
unforeseen costs, or reimbursing the CONSULTANT for additional work beyond that already defined in
this AGREEMENT. Such authorization(s) shall be in writing and shall not exceed the lesser of $50,000 or
10% of the Total Amount Authorized as shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT. The amount
included for the Management Reserve Fund is shown in the heading of this agreement. This fund may be
replenished in a subsequent supplemental agreement. Any changes requiring additional costs in excess of
the "Management Reserve Fund" shall be made in accordance with Section XIV, "Extra Work."
6. Maximum Total Amount Payable
The maximum total amount payable, by the AGENCY to the CONSULTANT under this AGREEMENT,
shall not exceed the amount shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT.
The Maximum Total Amount Payable is comprised of the Total Amount Authorized, which includes the
Fixed Fee and the Management Reserve Fund. The Maximum Total Amount Payable does not include
payment for extra work as stipulated in Section XIV, "Extra Work."
B. Monthly Progress Payments
The CONSULTANT may submit invoices to the AGENCY for reimbursement of actual costs plus the
calculated overhead and fee not more often than once per month during the progress of the work. Such
invoices shall be in a format approved by the AGENCY and accompanied by the monthly progress reports
required under Section III, General Requirements, of this AGREEMENT. The invoices will be supported by
an itemized listing for each item including direct salary, direct nonsalary, and allowable overhead costs to
which will be added the prorated Fixed Fee. To provide a means of verifying the invoiced salary costs for
CONSULTANT employees, the AGENCY may conduct employee interviews. These interviews may consist
of recording the names, titles, and present duties of those employees performing work on the PROJECT at the
time of the interview.
C. Final Payment
Final payment of any balance due the CONSULTANT of the gross amount earned will be made promptly
upon its verification by the AGENCY after the completion of the work under this AGREEMENT,
contingent upon receipt of all PS&E, plans, maps, notes, reports, and other related documents which are
required to be furnished under this AGREEMENT. Acceptance of such final payment by the
CONSULTANT shall constitute a release of all claims for payment which the CONSULTANT may have
against the AGENCY unless such claims are specifically reserved in writing and transmitted to the
AGENCY by the CONSULTANT prior to its acceptance. Said final payment shall not, however, be a bar
to any claims that the AGENCY may have against the CONSULTANT or to any remedies the AGENCY
may pursue with respect to such claims. The payment of any billing will not constitute agreement as to the
appropriateness of any item and that at the time of final audit, all required adjustments will be made and
reflected in a final payment. In the event that such final audit reveals an overpayment to the
CONSULTANT, the CONSULTANT will refund such overpayment to the AGENCY within ninety (90)
days of notice of the overpayment. Such refund shall not constitute a waiver by the CONSULTANT for any
claims relating to the validity of a finding by the AGENCY of overpayment.
D. Inspection of Cost Records
The CONSULTANT and the subconsultants shall keep available for inspection by representatives of the
AGENCY and the United States, for a period of three years after final payment, the cost records and
accounts pertaining to this AGREEMENT and all items related to or bearing upon these records with the
following exception: if any litigation, claim, or audit arising out of, in connection with, or related to this
contract is initiated before the expiration of the three-year period, the cost records and accounts shall be
retained until such litigation, claim, or audit involving the records is completed.
EXHIBIT D-1
CONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION SUMMARY SHEET
(COST PLUS FIXED FEE)
PROJECT: S Grady Way and Rainier Av S - Pavement Rehabilitation Project
DIRECT SALARY COST (DSC):
Estimated
Estimated
Estimated
Classification
Hours
Rates
Cost
Principal
0
x
$67.15 =
$0.00
Proj. Mgr. 4
43
x
$60.00 =
$2,580.00
Sr.Pro).Eng/Sci
8
x
$45.67 =
$365.36
Des. Engr/Sci
78
x
$33.22 =
$2,591.16
Staff Engr/Sci
110
x
$30.29 =
$3,331.90
Engr/Sci
0
x
$27.36 =
$0.00
Tech Edit
6
x
$27.47 =
$164.82
Word Proc.
16
x
$16.60 =
$265.60
CADD
108
x
$23.07 =
$2,491.56
Graphic Illus.
0
x
$22.80 =
$0.00
Sury Mgr
3
x
$46.87 =
$140.61
Sury Off: Ld
6
x
$35.86 =
$215.16
Survey Crew
16
x
$22.07 =
$353.12
Res Mgr/Sr Mgr
8
x
$30.63-- _
$245.04
Ld TechSup
6
x
$24.93 =
$149.68
TechSup
46
x
$20.17 =
$927.82
TOTALDSC
454
OVERHEAD (OH COST - including Salary Additives)
OH Rate x DSC of
FIXED FEE (FF):
FF Rate x (DSC+OH) of
REIMBURSABLES:
Internal.
Mileage/company Vehicle ($O.__/mile)
External. -
Per Diem
Lodging
Mileage/personal Vehicle ($0.365/mile)
Travel
Meals
Supplies
Reproduction
Telephone
Postage/Delivery
Other
Markup = 15%
SUBCONSULTANT COSTS (See Exhibit G)
Markup = 15%
Subconsultant Total
TOTAL
MANAGEMENT RESERVE FUND = 10%
GRAND TOTAL
PREPARED BY: Z,-- X��
167.0% x $13,821.73 =
15% x $36,904.02 =
$0.00
$13,821.73
$23,082.29
$5,535.60
$0.00
$0.00
$73.00
$0.00
$0.00
$200.00
$700.00
$0.00
$50.00
$0.00
$153.45
$1,176.45
Total Reimbursables = $1,176.45
DATE:��-
$4,369.00
$655.35
$5,024.35
$48,640.42
$4,864.04
$53,504.46
nrom,.bnom,r. m.An,mwwwiwn.. Z, C,,, Evan 1 of 1 CBP4e.D..W (,w. SM)
Exhibit E
BREAKDOWN OF OVERHEAD COST
Fringe Benefits
FICA 11.86%
Unemployment Compensation 1.39%
Medical Aid and Industrial Insurance 0.46%
Employee Retirement 6.38%
Employee Bonuses & Incentives 13.65%
Vacation, Holiday and Sick Leave 8.41 %
Total Fringe Benefits 42.16%
General Overhead
State Sales, B&O and Property Taxes
2.07%
Insurance
2.39%
Administration and Time Unassignable
61.57%
Printing, Stationery, and Supplies
4.60%
Professional Services
2.58%
Travel Not Assignable
5.32%
Communication not Assignable
3.81%
Fees, Dues, Professional Meetings
5.64%
Utilities and Maintenance
4.99%
Rent
19.85%
Office Miscellaneous
4.17%
Depreciation
7.47%
Total General Overhead 124.45%
GRAND TOTAL 166.61%
Note: The following accounts were deleted from this overhead rate:
Bad Debts, Interest, Officer's Life Inurance, Officers' Medical,
Contributions, and Entertainment.
C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\[2000design overhead rate.xls]Sheetl
Exhibit F
Payment Upon Termination of Agreement
By the Agency Other Than for —
Fault of the Consultant
(Refer to Agreement, Section IX)
Lump Sum Contracts
A final payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT which when added to any payments previously made shall
total the same percentage of the Lump Sum Amount as the work completed at the time of termination is to the
total work required for the PROJECT. In addition, the CONSULTANT shall be paid for any authorized extra
work completed.
Cost Plus Fixed Fee Contracts
A final payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT which when added to any payments previously made, shall
total the actual costs plus the same percentage of the fixed fee as the work completed at the time of termination is
to the total work required for the Project. In addition, the CONSULTANT shall be paid for any authorized extra
work completed.
Specific Rates of Pay Contracts
A final payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT for actual hours charged at the time of termination of this
AGREEMENT plus any direct nonsalary costs incurred at the time of termination of this AGREEMENT.
Cost Per Unit of Work Contracts
A final payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT for actual units of work completed at the time of
termination of this AGREEMENT.
Exhibit G
Subcontracted Work
The AGENCY permits subcontracts for the following portions of the work of this AGREEMENT:
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION
2003 - 2008 SIX -YEAR TIP
rady Way Approach at Rainier Avenue
DESCRIPTION:
Construct the westbound approach of Grady Way at Rainier Avenue in concrete.
JUSTIFICATION:
This segment of roadway has a pavement management OCI rating (Year 2000) of 59 out of
a possible 100 points. It is severely rutted.
roject Development
recon Eng/Admin
-O-W (includes Admin)
,onstruction Contract Fee
onstruction Eng/Admin
)they
'OTAS S
:n RC o S:
LI.DsP
hePeOtnOrc
Functional Classification: NIA
Proj. Length: 0.1 mile
RANK: 53
STATUS:
CHANGES:
New project.
Fund: 317
Pro]: 12212
CONTACT: Leslie Lahndt 425-430-7223
Lq
G"Awo. 5 - 53 FINAL
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
AIN:<
Submitting Data:
Dept/Div/Board.. PBPW / Utility Systems
Staff Contact...... Mike Benoit (x-7206)
Subject:
CAG 02-106
Thunder Hill Sanitary Sewer Pipeline Access Road
Repair Project
Exhibits:
Final Pay Estimate
Notice of Completion of Public Works Contract
Recommended Action:
Council Concur:
For Agenda of: January 6, 2003
Agenda Status
Consent ..............
Public Hearing..
Correspondence..
Ordinance .............
Resolution........... .
Old Business........
New Business.......
Study Sessions......
Information........ .
Approvals:
Legal Dept.........
Finance Dept......
Other ...............
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... $652.80 Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... $300,000 Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget $300,000 City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The project was awarded on July 22, 2002. Construction started on August 21, 2002 and was
completed as of December 20, 2002. The original contract amount was $185,097.08. The
final construction contract cost is $203,968.49. The total project cost, including engineering
and staff is $258,349
KI
There was one change order in the amount of $12, 364.47. This change order was primarily for
additional work and delays due to encountering unmarked buried electrical and telephone during
the removal of a culvert and relocation of the water main. The remainder of costs were from
additional quantities during the reconstruction of the road.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Utility Systems Division of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department recommends
that the project be accepted, the final pay estimate be approved, and the retainage in the amount
of $9,373.55 be released after 60 days, subject to the receipt of all required authorizations.
Rentonnet/agnbill/ bh
M
TO: FINANCE DIRECTOR
FROM: PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATOR
CONTRACTOR: Boettcher and Sons, Inc.
)NTRACT NO. CAG 02-106 ESTIMATE NO. 5 & Final
PROJECT: Thunder Hill Access Road Repairs
1. CONTRACTOR EARNINGS THIS ESTIMATE $600.00
2. SALES TAX @ 8.80% $52.80
3. TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT THIS ESTIMATE $652.80
4. EARNINGS PREVIOUSLY PAID CONTRACTOR $177,527.49
5. * EARNINGS DUE CONTRACTOR THIS ESTIMATE $570.00
6. SUBTOTAL - CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
7. RETAINAGE ON PREVIOUS EARNINGS $9,343.55
8. ** RETAINAGE ON EARNINGS THIS ESTIMATE $30.00
9. SUBTOTAL - RETAINAGE
10. SALES TAX PREVIOUSLY PAID $16,444.65
11. SALES TAX DUE THIS ESTIMATE $52.80
12. SUBTOTAL - SALES TAX
* (95% x LINE 1)
** (RETAINAGE: 5%) GRAND TOTAL:
FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTION:
PAYMENT TO CONTRACTOR (Lines 5 and 11):
ACCOUNT # 421.000400.018.5960.0035.65.045340(45340/5354)
mETAINED AMOUNT (Line 8):
ACCOUNT # 421.000400.018.5960.0035.65.045340(45340/5354)
CHARTER 116, LAWS OF 1965
CITY OF RENTON CERTIFICATION
1, THE UNDERSIGNED DO HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY
PERJURY, THAT THE MATERIALS HAVE BEEN FURNISHE E
SERVICES RENDERED OR THE LABOR PERFO/AT
DESCRIBED
HEREIN, AND THAT THE CLAIM IS A JUST, DUENPA
OBLIGATION AGAINST THE CITY OF RENTON, I AM
AUTHORIZED TO AUTHENTICATE AND CERTIFID CLAIM
Signed:
lU L
ro i ,�`
Printed On: 12/13/2002
$622.80 # 5 & Final
$30.00 # 5 & Final
TOTAL THIS ESTIMATE:
City of Renton Public Works Department
$178,097.49
$9,373.55
$16,497.45
$203,968.49
$622.80
$30.00
$652.80
Page 1
Printed On: 12/13/2002
Project: Thunder Hill Access Road Repairs
Contractor: Boettcher and Sons, Inc.
Item Description
No.
City of Renton Public Works Department
Contract Number:
Pay Estimate 5 & Final Closing Date:
Unit Est. Unit Previous Previous
Quantity Price Quantity Amount
CAG 02-106
12/23/2002
This This
Page 1
Total Total
001.
Mobilization/Demobilization
Lump Sum
1
$15,750.00
1.00
$15,750.00
0.00
$0.00
1.00
$15,7P
002.
Construction and As -Built Surveying
Lump Sum
1
$12,000.00
0.95
$11,400.00
0.05
$600.00
1.00
$12,000.00
003.
Erosion Controls
Lump Sum
1
$13,900.00
1.00
$13,900.00
0.00
$0.00
1.00
$13,900.00
004.
Metal Swing Security Gates
Each
2
$5,000.00
2.00
$10,000.00
0.00
$0.00
2.00
$10,000.00
005.
12" CPEP Storm Pipe
Linear Foot
105
$40.00
117.00
$4,680.00
0.00
$0.00
117.00
$4.680.00
006.
4' Corrugated Polyethylene Drainage Tubing Drain Pipe
Linear Foot
25
$20.00
21.00
$420.00
0.00
$0.00
21.00
$420.00
007.
Catch Basin - Type 1
Each
2
$950.00
2.00
$1,900.00
0.00
$0.00
2.00
$1,900.00
008.
Shoulder Ballast Material
Ton
965
$28.00
977.59
$27,372.52
0.00
$0.00
977.59
$27,372.52
009.
Gravel Borrow
Ton
75
$28.00
114.04
$3,193.12
0.00
$0.00
114.04
$3,193.12
010.
4' - 8" Quarry Spalls
Ton
70
$50.00
141.48
$7,074.00
0.00
$0.00
141.48
$7,074.00
Ott.
Road Washout Repair, between STA 6+65 and STA 7+30
Lump Sum
1
$10,476.00
1.00
$10,476.00
0.00
$0.00
1.00
$10,476.00
Culvert Pipe Removal/ Utility Walkway Bridge, Area A, STA
012.
8+30
Lump Sum
1
$14,000.00
1.00
$14,000.00
0.00
$0.00
1.00
$14,000.00
Culvert Pipe Removal/ Utility Walkway Bridge, Area B, STA
013.
10+50
Lump Sum
1
$14,000.00
1.00
$14,000.00
0.00
$0.00
1.00
$14,000.00
Streamside Restoration, between STA 11+60 and STA
014.
11+90
Lump Sum
1
$7,180.00
1.00
$7,180.00
0.00
$0.00
1.00
$7,180.00
Culvert Pipe Removal/ Utility Walkway Bridge, Area C, STA
015.
16+00
Lump Sum
1
$12.900.00
1.00
$12,900.00
0.00
$0.00
1.00
$12,90
016.
New 8" diameter water main replacement
Lump Sum
1
$14,000.00
1.00
$14,000.00
0.00
$0.00
1.00
$14,000.00
18" OD x 0.375" Thick Steel Casing, Casing Spacers, and
017.
End Seals
Lump Sum
1
$3,300.00
1.00
$3,300.00
0.00
$0.00
1.00
$3.300.00
018.
Trench Safety Support Systems
Lump Sum
1
$3,400.00
1.00
$3,400.00
0.00
$0.00
1.00
$3,400.00
019.
2" Diameter, Schedule 80 Pin Pile
Linear Foot
0
$22.00
25.50
$561.00
0.00
$0.00
25.50
$561.00
020.
Change Order No.1
Lump Sum
1
$11,364.40
1.00
$11,364.40
0.00
$0.00
1.00
$11,364.40
Subtotal
$186,871.04.
$600.00
$187,471.04
8.8% Sales Tax
$16,444.65
$52.80
$16,497.45
TT
Total
$203,315.69
$652.80
$203,968.49
s1'1+11 Ic E,
14.
17/
r
STATg State of Washington
o�
o Department of Revenue
4 Audit Procedures & Administration
m�yy ices �yOy°7 PO Box 47474
Olympia, Washington 98504-7474
Reg.No.: UBI C601 936 722
Date:
NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT
From: DEPARTMENT USE ONLY
_._. _ .
City of Renton Assigned To
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055 Date Assigned
Notice is hereby given relative to the completion of contract or project described below.
Description of Contract Thunder Hill Sanitary Sewer Pipeline Access Road Repair Project
Contractor's Name
Boettcher and Sons, Inc
(Fed Tax ID 91-1959452)
Telephone No. (360) 832-3943
Contractor's Address
PO Box 992, Eatonville, WA, 98328
Date Work Commenced
August 21, 2002
Date Work Completed
December 18, 2002
Date Work Accepted
December 20, 2002
Surety or Bonding Co.
McDonald Insurance Group
Agent's Address
PO Box 3089, Kirkland WA 98083
Contract Amount:
Additions or Reductions:
Sales Tax:
Total
$170,126.00
$17,345.04
$16,497.45
$203,968.49
By
IaMT,,M— z53
Amount Disbursed: $194,594.94
Amount Retained: $9,373.55
Total: $203,968.49
(Disbursing Officer)
The Disbursing Officer must complete and mail THREE copies of this notice to the Department of Revenue, Olympia, Washington 98504-
7474, immediately after acceptance of the work done under this contract. NO PAYMENTS SHALL BE MADE FROM RETAINED FUND
until receipt of Department's certificate, and then only in accordance with said certificate.
FORM REV 310020 (12-92)
H: Waste. wtr/talbotcrest/notcmplt.doc/MAB
r
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
AI k: `'
:Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works
For Agenda of: January 6, 2003
Dept/Div/Board.. Utility Systems Division
Agenda Status
Staff Contact...... Dave Christensen X-7212
Consent .............. X
Public Hearing..
Subject:
Annual Utility Systems Consultant Roster for Contracts in
Correspondence..
Ordinance .............
2003
Resolution............
Old Business........
New Business.......
Exhibits:
List of Annual Consultants on Shortlist (Attachment A)
Study Sessions......
Information.........
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Council Concur Legal Dept.........
Finance Dept......
Other ...............
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... _O_ Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted.......... _0_ Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget _0- City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
To have Council concurrence on the roster of annual consultants chosen to provide consulting
services for the Utility Systems Division of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department for
the year 2003. As a need for engineering services arises, a standard City of Renton engineering
services contract will be entered into with the most qualified consultant on the roster.
The consultants on this roster were selected by the Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) process,
as required by State law.
Contracts will be entered into in compliance with City Policy 250-02 (Bidding and Contracting
Requirements) and subsequent amendments to this policy, as may be approved by the Mayor
and Council.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Utility Systems Division recommends that Council authorize inclusion of the list of
consultants on Attachment A into the roster of annual consultants to be used for the year 2003
with the option of extending the roster annually in 2004 and 2005.
H:\File Sys\USA - Utility Systems Division Administration\USA-12 - Annual Consultant Agreement\USA-12-0014 - Agenda Bill\2003-2005 Consultant
Roster AB.doc\DMC:lf
ATTACHMENT A
UTILITY SYSTEMS DIVISION — PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
ANNUAL CONSULTANT ROSTER FOR 2003 — 2005
GENERAL UTILITY ENGINEERING:
TetraTech/KCM
HDR
Penhallegon & Associates Consulting
Economic and Engineering Services
RH2 Engineers
Montgomery Watson Harza
EarthTech
Parametrix
Gray & Osborne
Herrera & Associates
Brown & Caldwell
Roth Hill
Hammond, Collier, Wade, Livingstone
HYDRAULIC S/HYDROLOGY:
Northwest Hydraulics
R.W. Beck
TetraTech/KCM
Entranco
West Consultants
EarthTech
SOILS/GEOTECHNICAL:
Zipper Zieman Associates
Golder Associates
HWA Geosciences
Associated Earth Sciences
Landau Associates
GeoEngineers
GEOHYDROLOGY:
Pacific Groundwater Group
CH2M Hill
Golder Associates
PLAN REVIEW:
Entranco
ESM Consulting Engineering
Penhallegon & Associates Consulting
Perteet Engineering
Gray & Osborne
CONSTRUCTION/INSPECTION SERVICES:
Entranco
Montgomery Watson Harza
Parametrix
Berger/Abam Engineers
Perteet Engineering
Gray & Osborne
CORROSION CONTROL:
CH2M Hill
Norton Corrosion Limited
H:\File Sys\USA - Utility Systems Division Administration\USA-12 - Annual Consultant Agreement\USA-
12-0014 - Agenda Bill\2003-2005 Consultant RosterAttachment.doc\DMC:lf
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Al u: t; L ,
Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works
For Agenda of:
Dept/Div/Board. Wastewater Utility Section
January 6, 2003
Agenda Status
Staff Contact...... Dave Christensen, x-7212
Consent .............. X
Public Hearing..
Subject:
Correspondence..
Transfer of Ownership of Apollo Lift Station
Ordinance .............
Resolution............ X
Old Business........
New Business.......
Exhibits:
Issue Paper
Study Sessions......
Interlocal Agreement
Information.........
Draft Resolution
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Refer to Utilities Committee Legal Dept......... X
Finance Dept......
Other.
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... $0 Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget $0 City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The Apollo Lift Station is currently owned and operated under an agreement between Water
District 90 and Issaquah School District. This station serves Apollo Elementary School at this
time. The station is located within Renton's portion of its existing sewer service area on the
East Renton Plateau. As this is Renton's service area and it is a public lift station, staff is
recommending, with both the Water District's and School District's concurrence, that Renton
take over ownership of this facility
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning/Building/Public Works Department recommends that Council approve the
resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Agreement for the Transfer of
Sewer Facilities, which allows for the transfer of the Apollo Lift Station to Renton.
H:\File Sys\WWP - WasteWater\WWP-03-0000 Correspondance - Wastewater Utlity\davec\Apollo_Tumover AB.doc\DMC:lf
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 9, 2002
TO: Toni Nelson, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA:Mayor Jesse Tanner
FROM: Gregg Zimmerman(, ?dministrator
STAFF CONTACT: Dave Christensen, x-7212
SUBJECT: Transfer of Ownership of Apollo Lift Station
ISSUE:
The Apollo Lift Station is currently owned and operated under an agreement between Water
District 90 and Issaquah School District. This station serves Apollo Elementary School at
this time. The station is located within Renton's portion of its existing sewer service area on
the East Renton Plateau. As this is Renton's service area and it is a public lift station, staff is
recommending, with both the Water District's and School District's concurrence, that Renton
take over ownership of this facility
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning/Building/Public Works Department recommends that Council approve the
resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Agreement for the
Transfer of Sewer Facilities, which allows for the transfer of the Apollo Lift Station to
Renton.
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
The Apollo Elementary School was constructed in 1970. At that time, the City, the School
District, and the Water District entered into an agreement by which the City agreed to accept
flows from the school and the Water District agreed to maintain the lift station needed to
provide the service. In 2000, the City expanded its service area to include the East Renton
Plateau area that this station is located within. The City has since then been negotiating with
both the School District and the Water District to have Renton take over ownership of the lift
station as it is now within our service area. The agreement has been prepared, reviewed, and
approved by each of the administrative groups of the three agencies and is now ready for
December 9, 2002
Page 2
submittal for final approval by the Renton City Council and each of the District approving
authorities.
One additional change the City has made since the time we started this process is that the City
Council approved a new ordinance outlining revised conditions for the provision of sewer
service outside our corporate limits. This revision was put in place primarily to hold off
approval of service to new developments until we can resolve two major items. The first is
to be assured that the questions surrounding annexation can be answered. The second is to
allow us to be able to negotiate with King County regarding their current practice of allowing
dense development (up to R-48) in portions of our Potential Annexation Area where we are
not planning for the higher densities.
For this application, the lift station currently provides service to an existing school, which is
covered as an allowed service in the revised code. Second, it is anticipated that this station or
a replacement of this station will be utilized for a new development that has existing sewer
availability from the City. This also is covered as an allowed service by the revised code.
This facility will be transferred to the City at no cost from the two districts. The City will
need to expend approximately $5,000 to $10,000 in 2003 to install its telemetry system into
the station. This telemetry will allow City crews to be able to directly communicate with the
station and be notified of any emergency situations from the station. The Wastewater CIP
has anticipated this expense and has the funds needed to allow for the telemetry installation.
The Water District will remove its telemetry system as we install our system.
CONCLUSION:
It is in the best interest of the City for both the existing use as well as for the proposed new
development that the City gains ownership of this facility. As such, it is recommended that
Council adopt the resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreement,
thus allowing for the transfer of the facilities to Renton.
\\DAEDALUS\SYS2\SHARED\Fi1e Sys\WWP - WasteWater\WWP-03-0000 Correspondance - Wastewater
Utl ity\davec\Apollo_Tumover_Issue.doc\DMC:lf
CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY WATER DISTRICT 90 AND
ISSAQUAH SCHOOL DISTRICT 411
AGREEMENT FOR THE TRANSFER OF SEWER FACILITIES
This agreement made and entered into this day of , 20_, by
and between KING COUNTY WATER DISTRICT 90, a municipal corporation,
hereinafter referred to as "THE WATER DISTRICT", ISSAQUAH SCHOOL
DISTRICT 411, a Washington municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "THE
SCHOOL DISTRICT", and the CITY OF RENTON, a Washington municipal
corporation hereinafter referred to as "RENTON", all having been duly organized and
existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Washington,
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, RENTON provides public services, including water and sewer
service, within its prescribed area; and
WHEREAS, THE WATER DISTRICT provides water service within its
prescribed area; and
WHEREAS, THE SCHOOL DISTRICT provides educational services within its
prescribed area; and
WHEREAS, THE WATER DISTRICT and THE SCHOOL DISTRICT have
constructed, managed, operated, and maintained certain sewer facilities which exist in
areas which are within or adjacent to RENTON's sewer service boundary, and which can
efficiently be managed, operated and maintained by RENTON in conjunction with other
facilities in the City; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest for the parties herein to enter into an
agreement that provides for the transfer of those sewer facilities to RENTON; now
therefore,
IT IS HEREBY AGREED by and between the parties hereto as follows:
l . Transfer of Sewer System to RENTON. The facilities listed below (commonly
referred to as "The Apollo Lift Station Facilities") and as shown on Exhibit "A",
Asbuilt Drawings, are hereby transferred to Renton by THE WATER DISTRICT
and THE SCHOOL DISTRICT. The facilities so included are:
♦ Sanitary Sewage Lift Station and Appurtenances
♦ Approximately 1600 Linear Feet of 6-inch Force Main
♦ Approximately 1360 Linear Feet of 8-inch Sewer Main
THE WATER DISTRICT and THE SCHOOL DISTRICT acknowledge that,
pursuant to this agreement, they no longer have any claim or ownership to the
facilities listed above. THE WATER DISTRICT and THE SCHOOL DISTRICT
agree to execute a Bill of Sale document for transfer of the facilities. Upon
completion of an executed Bill of Sale from both THE WATER DISTRICT and
THE SCHOOL DISTRICT, RENTON hereby agrees to manage, operate and
maintain the transferred facilities.
2. Transfer of Easement and Right -of -Way Documents.
THE WATER DISTRICT and THE SCHOOL DISTRICT shall execute any
documents or deeds necessary to transfer or assign the Easement and Right -of
Way documents for the facilities described in Paragraph 1 above to RENTON,
(provided, that THE WATER DISTRICT may retain rights to concurrent use of
rights -of -way or easements as necessary or convenient to the operation of THE
WATER DISTRICT's system), and RENTON agrees to accept responsibility for
all maintenance or other actions required by said document. Each Agency shall
be responsible for its own costs associated with this transfer. THE WATER
DISTRICT or THE SCHOOL DISTRICT shall not have any liabiliy for disputes
arising over said rights -of -way or easements so transferred or assigned, except
that any disputes arising due to the actions of THE WATER DISTRICT or THE
SCHOOL DISTRICT, other than actions necessary to effectuate this transfer,
shall not be affected by this section.
3. Disclaimer from Third Party Liability. THE WATER DISTRICT and THE
SCHOOL DISTRICT shall disclose any and all known defects or problems of or
in the facilities herein transferred to RENTON. THE WATER DISTRICT and
THE SCHOOL DISTRICT shall not be liable for any claims by third parties
arising from acts or damages by RENTON or its customers, arising from the use
of the facilities transferred to RENTON pursuant to this Agreement, including,
but not limited to, any disruption of service related to this transfer. RENTON
shall hold harmless and indemnify THE WATER DISTRICT and THE SCHOOL
DISTRICT from any claim within the scope of this paragraph which may be made
by third parties and which indemnity shall include all costs, including reasonable
attorney's fees, related to defense of such claim.
4. Sanctity of Agreement. This agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the
parties, and there are no representations or oral agreements other than those listed
herein, which vary the terms of this agreement. Future agreements may occur
between the parties to transfer additional, facilities by mutual agreement.
5. Obligations Intact. Nothing herein shall be construed to alter the rights,
responsibilities, liabilities, or obligations of THE WATER DISTRICT, THE
SCHOOL DISTRICT, or RENTON regarding provision of services provided by
each of the parties herein, except as specifically set forth herein.
6. Cost Of Transfer. Unless otherwise specifically stated in this agreement, each
agency shall be responsible for its costs associated with this transfer including but
not limited to staff costs or attorney's time to review this agreement or documents
arising out of this agreement. RENTON agrees to prepare all documents required
to allow for the transfer of the facilities identified in this agreement.
7. Existing District Telemetry Equipment. Upon acceptance of the facilities
identified in Section 1 by RENTON, THE WATER DISTRICT shall be permitted
to salvage any and all components of its existing telemetry system installed at the
existing lift station. THE WATER DISTRICT shall assure that the removal of its
equipment does not adversely affect the operation of the remaining lift station
equipment.
DATED this day of , 20
Approved by Ordinance No. of the City Council of the City of RENTON,
Washington, at its regular meeting held on day of ,
20
CITY OF RENTON
Title:
ATTEST:
Marilyn Petersen, City Clerk
Approved by Resolution No. of the Board of Commissioners of King
County Water District 90 of King County, Washington, adopted at its regular
meeting held on day of , 20
KING COUNTY WATER DISTRICT 90
I=
Title:
Approved by Resolution No. of the Issaquah School District No 411
Board of King County, Washington, adopted at its regular meeting held on
day of , 20_
ISSAQUAH SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 411
Title:
e"uHocnovn
NOTTu{ WT
H !
O'm 11_
LJ N !
Q 6 Huw.nO >< Z
eeVtu V
1
I
m )
60
7T-
T.i I
NOTES'
l THRUST BLOC--1 MAIN AT ALL TV RN S.
NMW. OVt0. OF FORCE NMI..OR AS REOVIRED
Z BY THE ENGINEER.
3 -1-5 CUT MATERIAL TD BE PLACED UN LOW AREAS
115 DIRECTED BY ENGINEER. (5EE SHEET 2)
4. USE C.I. BENI05 ON FORCE NMIN.
S CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL A 2e--1 EVLVERT UNDER THE
DIRT ROAD WHERE "Ll NNTEii1AL IS PLACED OR A
DIRECTED BT THE ENGINEER. ALL —11 OF LABOR
AND MATERIAL TO BE INCLUDED IN THE UNIT
51D PRICE FOR THE 4" FORCE MAIN.
a CON',--O' TO NOTIFY CITY OF RE-NTON FRIOR TO
NM'AI NG CONNECTION.
T -V DEFLECTION SER ! P
Jo1NT FOR FORCE —'q
' Bn vw pwv PO[ro ,_
5-155
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NO. 8 SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE
SITE sB AOD NOTE i. ISSAQUAH SCHOOL DISTRICT NQ 411
J—z ,varrn nr ua <. • wisrrxu ISSAQUAH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NO. 8
HILL, INGMAN, CHASE & CO.
.• �...A, me /4
�;;lL:'I'I'I'III'"i"'I^�I'':I'�.}��.iy.r;;LLL..LI,I•I�I•al;�.�,�:i,��l.�,l,�,l:��i";I, � .... ... ...... _ . .. .. __.. .. .. .. ........
ODT 93VHD'NYWONI 111H
8 ON -IOOH:)S A>JV1N31N312 Hvnovssi
[It, ON .1.0181SIO 1001-13S Hvnovssi
3'11-108 d ONV NVId 83M26
MOEN
some
m
0
MEREN
--
m
NO
mom
r
I
0
-2
0
im
MRS
rh
WIN
is
I
711F.L =:j
NOUVOUICON 113M 13M
NOUVIS
AM IM1151)(3
L.All 3S '-AAV ON8ql '83N CA12 13SNI)S
V-V NOIJ.03S
-MM. 13.At\ ffi3N
7mrt
1.
NO d!N0,l
V 13 C)
I-N T
"No
vNs N'lly Hlw �
lllnYlo- fl-
N.11-S -co8 11 NI o'
n,Oa 01.
I I A
MR
ONIIS-0 Ol 9NIArd 1IVHdSV,
*' �)Nlis'13
ot—
d s aw.ovi dv�nd
r, 11"3 jo NVId
A d
epioW tl.T,
LK91" eoj o2lle nh
-c%'
L A, SAA I Id 1l9n1j",
okoVol qnf-
N d.nd p
N, ......
Nv" io Asillavv
�i CITY OF RENTON
.rt Office of the City Attorney
J e Tanner, Mayor Lawrence J. Warren
MEMORANDUM
Puauc ;rya,<.s
To: Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator
From: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date: March 13, 2002
Subject: Apollo Lift Station Transfer Agreement
The changes are generally picky and of no great concern. I would amend Section 6 to state that
"cost covered by this section do not include staff costs or attorney's time to review this agreement
or documents arising out of this agreement". I don't want to pay their staff or attorney to review
documents we have drawn for the transfer if we undertak the cost of drafting and filing.
Lawrence J arren
LJW:tmj
cc: Jay Covington
Dave Christensen
Lys Hornsby
Post Office Box 626 - Renton, Washington 98057 - (425) 255-8678 / FAX 425-255-5474
Thies nanar rnntnins Rnl % mnvrlarimatariat ,An % nnct --or
DRAFT
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH KING COUNTY WATER DISTRICT 90
AND ISSAQUAH SCHOOL DISTRICT RELATING TO THE TRANSFER OF
FACILITIES FROM THE DISTRICTS TO RENTON.
WHEREAS, the City of Renton provides public services, including water and
sewer service, within its prescribed area; and
WHEREAS, King County Water District 90 provides water service within its
prescribed area; and
WHEREAS, Issaquah School District provides educational services within its
prescribed area; and
WHEREAS, King County Water District 90 and Issaquah School District have
constructed, managed, operated, and maintained certain sewer facilities which exist in
areas which are within or adjacent to Renton's sewer service boundary, and which can
efficiently be managed, operated, and maintained by Renton in conjunction with other
facilities in the City; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest for the parties herein to enter into an
agreement to provide for the transfer of those sewer facilities to Renton;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The above recitals are found to be true and correct in all respects.
DRAFT
SECTION II. The Mayor and City clerk are hereby authorized to enter into an
interlocal agreement with King County Water District 90 and the Issaquah School
District allowing for the transfer of sewer facilities to the City of Renton.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2003
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
day of
Jesse Tanner, Mayor
2003
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
COMMITTEE REPORT
January, 6, 2003
Neighborhood / Business Design Standards
(Letter From Rich Wagner)
(Referred August 1.3, 2001)
APPROVED BY
CITY COUNCIL
a
Date - 6 - 02003
Ina letter to, the City Council of August 14`b 2001 from former Planning Commissioner, Rich
Wagner, he outlined the: following issues for discussion in the future. The Committee
recommends that these issues be addressed as outlined below. .
1) What does Renton want to be in 2020 and 2025?
This issue will be addressed during the 2003 Comprehensive Plan update.
2) Urban Design,.and Streetscape Design
This issue will be addressed through the discussion of the Community Design policies during
the Comprehensive Plan update. Thcj, fiffitcIDevelopment, Neighborhoods and Strategic
Planning Department has developed�jaftnew element `othe Comprehensive Plan that will
address -City-wide design issues
pq
3) Downtown Pedestrian Frontages -00,
This issue was addressedk during the review ofGhe downtown policies and the City Council
...gave -direction to ex an_ �6 �° ���' g p the ler}gth of the pedestn corridor. The issue will be taken up
during the 2003 Title IV docket revue% RM
g
.,w
N
4) Automall amenities package
This; issue was to, be a futureliase of the Automall relyn on,p vate. investment ,based on
public guidelines. The standard's are adopted in code ,SAodrtional phases will require a new
rw
work programs
5) Neighborhood identity - �? '
Several concepts have been suggested during�Wcurrent Comprehensive Plan. amendment
process that could ; lead to incentive programs for reinforciang neighborhood identity:
Renton's. Neighborhood Program also works with community groups, to this end;
•
Kathy K lker-Wheeler, Chair
-Terri Priere, c Chair
King Parker, Member
ee: aey 10 �; "1JNSP
WagnerLtr.rpt\
The Planning and Development, Committee has received an update from the Development
Services Division on. the issue of temporary real estate: signs' obscuring established
neighborhood signs. The real estate direct aI signs which were blocking the view of
the new Maplewood Glen neighborhsignbon Maple,Valley Highway, have been
moved as requested by staff, Te D� velop ent Seivic sDvision had also instituted an
k�A.
interim policy prohibiting fiStu mstat'latiow4 perms ted ealkestate signs which obscure
the view of.public signs; eludi4nj e ghborhood entry-9 s �"taff is working.on
proposed code changes for real.bstate signs and will report i,o fh Committee on
recommended code revisions ata later d2'Qk
'k
The Committee recommeA s that ties itemrern.ain m committee pinding further review
and possible code revisions to Furth ddriss this issue.
ni
A.
'N
s"
ft
�.
Kdhy..Ke lker-Wheeler, Chair
T Brier , is -Chaff
ng Par. . er,.Member
cc: Gregg. Zimmerman
Neil. Watts .
Maximum Residential Fence. Height Regulations
(Referred March 18, 2002),
The Planning and Development Committee met to review and discuss .potential revisions to: the
maximum, residential fence height regulations established in. Title IV.
Currently', City code limits the height of residential fences to a maximum of four feet when located
adjacent :to a public street. The Planning and Development Committee met in April to, discuss
possible changes .to the fence height regulations. ;The Committee recommended that a public hearing
be conducted; which occurred on May 6, 2002. Committee members subsequently touredseveral
residential neighborhoods in November and,u�ected�_taff to address setback, landscaping and fencing
material requirements.
Staff has .drafted revised fence9�tancar�d which would Iow�esidents. to apply for -.a Special.
Admmistratlye Fence Permit lllordef�to construct 6�oothlgh fence vhen located within a front yard .
or side yard along a street setlacic The permits would be issued�oh,, ale=by-case basis provided the
applicant demonstrates they fencet�construcied,wthapproprlate fencing material; the fence is
sufficiently screened; and, the finished steFofhence is oriented towardthe streetscape.
41.
a-M��
.40 4,74
/� .
. Kathy eolker=Vdheeler, Cbm
hap
y< T "
Te B re Vice air
1 .
King. Parker, Member -
cc: Gregg. Zimmerman
Neil Watts
PLANNING,AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE fence height report #3\
Rev 01/02 bh
't
R_vj__SI*dent_r,iau..,F-enc,
R a' l .t. �o
s r+�,
-S."
The issue...
*Many different fence types throughout the City;
*Some conforming; and,
*Many non -conforming to current regulations.
51C7HT
C�-.,.,urrent Regult aAiiinas
42" MAXIMUM VAEJC-.,HT
40'MA>GMUM HEJC�:
72" MAXIMUM HEIGHT
Many n-onqp-conf,--o-j fFences,
wnotch t d a r-rORe-vi,ew t, t
c a rye lvl,�iat,,-ious.
il
st reg-
`he..Plnin
m -an---&Deve lopent
Iere
ok
Com--m--lIrtee Co n1,,-s*jdd - p r-)itl",,,V/acy
trriva-.e
,yj
it+
a
no
a ^x
�"r • �. ,„ � fit,
�; � �" rM1 F ♦ � t. �'- �'�ffir, . l fi +, i' -
�' i•
��RI. . �� 1
't�,
� .. ��-.t. y .
� � C 1 � � u
•
k#�pjP� .1,
4 � �t
_
� __� �'�
1 f . � ° '' �
� o � €�. '{, t t�'#,*P�¢, !L fir' 't k�rf` t r '���,�¢[t� i
�" 'fit � � a � ��`r�;��� � I
� � r � � jj�
:�; e
� � �!`a �E
�.
�+ � ��
�� j - �� z �� ��
tit'y r '� � «� � � • �
,g
*�«�,
-_ ,
� ��
R
r r. _ � .
X..
"i.Y �.:�' •`III -
� �£:•
Landsca-,pi"ng ' *j utSex
witho A
me b,- , a c k s,
'W% tKmataw-lon
Allow fences located adjacent to streets to
be 6-foot high subject to the following:
• High quality fencing materials;
• Sufficiently screened by landscaping;
and,
• Finished side of the fence oriented toward
the street.
i e�+c t'd i' - '.•': gym.. },$ • i_ �IF
er]Ce ' 10erRITIcavan iviap
Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
�J �� � � - -
Pursuant to Councl's approval of the Whitworth street vacation for St: Anthony's Parish
(VAG=00-003), the execution and recording of a .development agreement was required in
order to: address issues presented in the July 15, 2002 Planning and Development Committee
report to the Council'
As required, St. Anthony's has, .prepared drafts' of the document and "in coordination with the
City. Attorney and City staff has: arriv d,,At a - inal rm of the proposed agreement : The
Planning and. Development Committee Fhas�rcv ewed W&Iinai :draft of the agreement and has
r
determined the document appropn`ate%y addresses; thevis�ues previously identified by the
gv
Committee.
Therefore, the. Committee�recomnmerids that the Council refers th4e item to staff for purposes of
processing the necessary EnvifonmeiitalSP)Review hearing before the City
Council and drafting of the enacting 'fesolution TlioComrnittee further, recommends that a
public`hearing date of Februy 110, 2b3beafilrshd:
The Committee also nd that the= er ato; a, jy, adjacent property owners; expressed
special concerns: during the public
ME T he Committee therefore recommends.,that' staff
contact the Zerbato family�to m orrn them of the draft developmenf agreement,, and report
back to the Committee on the results�of..this dascusslon F z.
Kathy K olker-Wheeler, Chair
Briere e C
ng Parker; Member
cc: Neil Watts
Jennifer Henning
Lesley Nishihira
Larry Warren
St. Anthony Committee Report.doc\ Rev 01/02 bh
.iauuaiy V, 4VVJ
LAND USE/BUILDING PERMIT EXPIRATION PERIOD
VALID APPROVAL
VALID EXTENSION
EXTENSION ISSUED
TYPE OF PERMIT
DECISION -MAKER
TIME
PERIOD
BY
Development Services
Lot Line Adjustment
Development Services Directors
2 yearss
1 ear/1 time12
Director
Development Services
Short Plat (4 lots or less)
PB/PW Administrators
2 years
1 year/1 time12
Director
Short Plats (5-9 lots) .
Hearing Examiners
2 years
1 ear/1 time12
PB/PW Administrator
Preliminary Plat (10 lots or
Recommendation: HEXI
more)
Decision: City Council
5 years4
1 ear/1 time6
PB/PW Administrator
Final Plat
City Council2
6 months
6 months/1 time
City Council
2 years (in 1 year
Binding Site Plan
PB/PW Administrator)
5 yearsi
increments)13
PB/PW Administrator
Binding Site Plan Merged
Lapses when Site Plan
2 years (in 1 year
with Site Plan
Hearing Examiners
expires
increments)13
PB/PW Administrator
Binding Site Plan merged
with Development
Lapses when Development
2 years (in 1 year
Agreement
City Council2
Agreement ex ires
increments)13
PB/PW Administrator
Administrative Site PIan
Development Services
Level 1
Development Services Directorl
2 years
2 years
Director
Hearing Examiner Site Plan
Level 1
Hearing Examiners
2 years
2 years
Hearing Examiner
Development Services Director or
Site Plan Level 2
Hearing Examiners
2-5 years
1 year12
Zoning Administrator
Baring Examiner
Conditional Use Permit
Hearing Examiners
2 years
1 ear/1 time
Hearing Examiner
Administrative Conditional
Development Services Director or
Hearing Examiner or Zoning
Use Permit
Zoning Administrator)
2 years
1 ear/1 time
Administrator .
current as of 01/03/2003
LAND USE/BUILDING PERMIT EXPIRATION PERIOD
VALID APPROVAL
VALID EXTENSION
EXTENSION ISSUED
TYPE OF PERMIT
DECISION -MAKER
TIME
PERIOD
BY
Reasonable amortization
periods for any substantial
upgrades to the premises
HEX: Non -Conforming Uses s
that are required by City
PB/PW Administrator or Designee:
Code shall be given for
Rebuild Approval Permit
Non -Conforming Structures)
conditions of approval
Reserved
NA
Special Permit for FiII &
6 months -unless a longer
Valid until approved work is
Grade
Hearing Examiners
time is approved by HEX
completed
Hearing Examiner
Mobile Home Parks
Hearing Examiners
3 years
1 ear/1 time
Hearing Examiner
Shoreline Substantial
PB/PW Administrator or Hearing
Development Services
Development Permit
Examiners "
2-5 yearS7,8
1 ear/1 time12
Director
Shoreline Conditional
Hearing Examiner and WA State
Hearing Examiner and
Use/Variance Permit
Department of Ecolog 3
2-5 years7'9
2 ear/1 time12
Department of Ecology
Development Services
Temporary Use Permit
Development Services Directors
1 yearlo
up to 2 yearsss
Director
Rezone
CityCounCi12
NA
NA
NA
2 years; 3 yrs. if specifically
Board of Adjustment or Hearing
approved during time of
Board of Adjustment or
Variance-BOA/HEX
Examiners
application
1 year
Hearing Examiner
2 years; 3 yrs. if specifically
approved during time of
Variance -Administrative
PB/PW Administrators
application
1 year
PB/PW Administrator
Building Permit
Applications
Building Officials
6 months
6 months/1 time12
Building Official
Issued Building Permits
Building Officials
6 monthsi1
7 months/1 time12
Building Official
current as of 01 /03/2003
LAND USEBUILDING PERMIT EXPIRATION PERIOD
Any concerned party can appeal a project recommendation or decision during the 14-day appeal period. An appeal of a decision or recommendation must be
received by the City Clerk's Office by 5:00 PM on the appeal deadline date. An appeal must be requested in writing accompanied by a $75 appeal fee. All
appeals are filed with the City of Renton City Clerk's Office on the 7th floor of Renton City Hall.
2. Appeals of City Council decisions must be filed with King County Superior Court. For land use decisions, an appeal must be filed within 21 days of the issuance
of the land use decision.
3' Appeals of Shoreline Permits must be filed with the State Shorelines Hearings Board within 30 days of receipt of the final order and by concurrently filing copies
of the request with Washington Department of Ecology and the Attorney General's office.
4' In the case of a phased subdivision, final plat approval of any phase of the preliminary plat shall constitute an automatic one-year extension for the filing of the
next phase of the subdivision.
5. In the case of a phased binding site plan, submittal for the recording of any phase of the binding site plan will constitute an automatic one-year extension for the
submittal of the next phase of the binding site plan.
6. Additional time extensions beyond this one-year time period may be granted by the Council in one-year increments.
7. Construction must be commenced within 2 years of permit issuance or the permit will terminate. Construction must be completed within 5 years of permit
issuance.
$' (RMC 4-9-190:J.Lb) If it is determined that standard time requirements of subsections J2 and J3 of this section should not be applied, the Development
Services Division shall adopt appropriate time limits as a part of action on a substantial development permit upon finding of good cause, based on the requirements
and circumstances of the proposed project and consistent with the policy and provisions of this Master Program and RCW 90.58.143. "Good cause" means that
the time limits established are reasonably related to the time actually necessary to perform the development on the ground and complete the project that is being
permitted.
9. (RMC 4-9-190TLb) If it is determined that standard time requirements of subsections J2 and J3 of this section should not be applied, the Hearing Examiner,
upon a finding of good cause and with the approval of the DOE, shall establish appropriate time limits as part of action on a conditional use or variance permit.
"Good cause" means that the time limits established are reasonably related to the time actually necessary to perform the development on the ground and complete
the project that is being permitted.
current as of 01/03/2003
LAND USE/BUILDING PERMIT EXPIRATION PERIOD
10. Occupancy of a temporary structure (existing home, mobile home or travel trailer with adequate water and sewer/septic service) on the same lot while a
residential building is being constructed or while a damaged residential building is being repaired, and when a valid residential building permit is in force. The
permit may be granted for up to 180 days but cannot exceed the expiration date of the building permit.
11. This 6-month period is automatically extended if an inspection of the site verifies that progress has been made on the approved project.
11 Request for extension must be filed prior to expiration.
13. Request for extension must be filed at least 30 days prior to expiration.
14. Request for extensions must be filed at least 45 days prior to expiration.
15. Request for longer period of validity must be made at the time of application.
Lot Line Adjustment
Subdivision/Plat
Short Plat
Preliminary plat
Final Plat
current as of 01/03/2003
DEFINITIONS
The transfer of land between abutting legal lots provided no additional lots are created.
The subdivision of land into legal lots.
The subdivision of land into less than 10 legal lots.
The subdivision of land into 10 or more legal lots.
Review of a preliminary plat for compliance with City of Renton's subdivision regulations prior to recording.
LAND USEBUILDING PERMIT EXPIRATION PERIOD
Binding Site Plan The subdivision of land classified for industrial, commercial, or mixed use.
Site Plan Review Review of a project's horizontal and vertical elements on a site; including buildings, circulation, landscaping, and parking.
Evaluation of a use in a zone where it would not ordinarily be permitted outright to determine whether it is consistent with the
Conditional Use existing and potential uses in the general area.
Review of non -conforming uses/structures which became nonconforming as a consequence of City Code amendments in 1993 and
Rebuild Approval thereafter to determine whether they should be allowed to rebuild.
Special Permit for Fill and
Grade Review of drilling, mining, filling or grading of 500 cubic yards or more.
Review of mobile home parks to assure that they comply with City regulations in providing a pleasant residential living
Mobile Home Parks environment.
Shoreline Permits
Temporary Use Permit
Rezone
Variance
Building Permits
current as of 01/03/2003
Review of all development within 200 feet of state regulated shorelines.
Evaluates whether modified development standards for a use or structure should be permitted on a short term basis.
Review of proposals to change the zoning of property.
Considers whether a project may vary from Code requirements in Title IV, such as setbacks, height restrictions, lot coverage, and
wetland buffer width reductions.
Reviews the construction of a structure per City of Renton's development regulations and the Uniform Building Code.
CITY OF RENTON
LEGISLATIVE DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 6, 2003
TO: Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Staff
City At Staff
Development Services Staff
FROM: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Council President
SUBJECT: Thank You
The year 2002 was a memorable one for me as Chair of the Planning and Development
Committee. Although I look forward to working with all of you in a different role as
Council President in 2003, I know I will miss the work of the Planning and Development
Committee. In 2002, we were able to accomplish many things and to set many others
things in motion. That is due to the hard work and dedication of committee members and
staff who put in the extra time and effort to "do it right the first time" which seems to
have become my mantra for this committee over the years.
Thank you to Terri Briere who has learned quickly, studied hard, asked the tough
questions and who has my complete confidence as she leads this committee's work in
2003. Thank you to King Parker who added much depth to the conversation and was
willing to roll up his sleeves and get into "process" as we grappled with some very
complex issues (and he even asked to be on the committee again this year!). And thanks
to all the staff who had to deal with the balancing act of different ideas, competing
interests, a range of personalities and the daily challenges of a city on the move. With
staff's excellent professional assistance and personal good humor, we worked on a range
of issues including:
Fence heights, abandoned grocery carts, historic (shhhh!) significance, urban. center
design, sign codes, Boeing - plant development agreement, Longacres agreement, and
EIS, zoning codes, secure community transition facilities, growth targets, countywide
planning policies, street vacations, Highlands residential demonstration projects, Title IV
and the new docket process, permit processes, binding site plans, working with the
planning commission, temporary signs, development regulations, landscaping issues, and
other exciting topics. We also heard at least 5 appeals and went on several field trips.
It has been a pleasure for me as the Chair of Planning and Development to work with
such a great team of people who truly have the best interests of the community in mind
when making some very difficult recommendations and decisions. Thanks to all of you
for a job well done.
cc: Renton City Council
Mayor Jesse Tanner
Jay Covington
Bonnie Walton
Gregg Zimmerman
SECRETARIA DE
RELACIONES
EXTERIORES
The Mexican Ministry of Foreign Affairs informs that, as part of the Integral Program for the Improvement
of the Consular Services, on March 6, 2002 started issuing a new higher security Consular ID, called
"Matricula Consular de Alta Seguridad" or MCAS.
5 ' ii
The main MCAS security backs are either visible or invisible security features:
Visible security features:
1) Green security paper, with a special security pattern.
2) "Advantage seal", with a Mexican Official seal that appears over the bearer's picture that changes color
from green to brown when seen with natural light.
3) Infra red band on the back of the MCAS.
4) Using a flourescent-light lamp, you are able to read SRE all over the front of the MCAS.
Invisible security features:
in order to be able to reveal the invisible MCAS security marks, a special decoder is needed. Using this decoder
you can see the following:
On the front side:
1) The word MEXICO written at the left side of the MCAS, next to the bearer's picture.
2) The legend "MATRICULA CONSULAR CONSULAR ID CARD", written at the bottom of the MCAS.
Came �D03
COMMUNITY SERVICES
COMMITTEE REPORT
January 6, 2003
�I
General Fund Contingency Plan for Human Services
(Referred December 16, 2002)
The Community. Services Committee. recommends concurrence ,with the ,staff.
recommendation that the 2003 General Fund Contingency Plan be distributed as in.
accordance with the - Human Services Advisory Committee recommendations and
conditions as shown below.
-,Old Contingency Plan��e
g y
r New Revised:Contingency Plane
v.
.
Metropolitan Iinages/Renton Youth,ISay �2500
Metropolitan,'_',' ages/Renton Youth Day $2500
— submit budget:and perfomameAmdasurelil
performance measures to
Z
be approved -by Janu ry 31, 2003
Multi -Service Center E5ergy"h Grist g9-fif
Intervention Program $50ty
Vletr oli n Ima es/Renton Youth Day
>� p
4t1 =ahe
�
does noIn by 1/31�/03 funds will be
W
�..
, acate o Wad B ck Inn
, QW
'. Kiriounty Sexual Assault, Resource Center
Vb
.._; g..
$5000'
Renton&Areaout Services $9000
Comiti chools of Renton $14,200
Total $7,500
Total $30.;700
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. 3 � I D
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
APPROVING FINAL PLAT (COBBLESTONE; FILE NO. LUA-02-073FP)
WHEREAS, a petition for the approval of a final plat for the subdivision of a certain tract
of land as hereinafter more particularly described, located within the City of Renton, has
heretofore been duly approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department; and
WHEREAS, after due investigation the Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public
Works Department has considered and recommended the approval of said final plat, and such
approval being deemed proper and advisable and in the public interest; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that appropriate provisions are made for
the public health, safety, and general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or
roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and
recreation, playgrounds, schools and schoolgrounds and all other relevant facts, including
sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who walk
to and from school; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the public use and interest will be
served by the platting of such subdivision and dedication;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF' THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects.
1
RESOLUTION NO.
1% 1
SECTION H. The final plat heretofore submitted and approved by the
Planning/Building/Public Works Department pertaining to the following described real estate, to
wit:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth
(The groperty, consisting of approximately 4.7 acres, is located in the vicinity of
NE 4 Street and Union Avenue NE)
be and the same is hereby approved as such plat, subject to the laws and ordinances of the City of
Renton, and subject to the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the
Planning/Building/Public Works Department dated December 19, 2002.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2002.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this T day of , 2002.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RES.961:12/26/02:ma
Jesse Tanner, Mayor
2
COBBLESTONE LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PARCEL A:
PARCEL-C OF CITY OF RENTON BOUNDARY LINE REVISION NO. LUA-01-
081-LLA, RECORDED OCTOBER 9, 2001 UNDER RECORDING NO.
20011009900011 IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
PARCEL B:
LOT 1 OF KING COUNTY SHORT PLAT NO 8112039003, ACCORDING TO
SHORT PLAT RECORDED DECEMBER 3, 1981, BEING CITY OF RENTON SHORT
PLAT NO. 076-81 (PICKERING SHORT PLAT), IN KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTON.
COBBLESTONE -
UNP-LATTED
21' 20 19 1E 17 16 15. 14 13 • 12
U N PLATTE D
TB. A
42 43
41 44
z 22 40 45 11 10 9 8 7 6 I--t4 3 ]2:
v
r. 39 46
24 M, C
-+ 38.
2' 47 66 C
37 .
26 54 65 M -F
3s
•27 . 35 49 58 64
S
28 - 34 50 57 63 [T1
29 33 51 J8 62 LOT 2 Z
CITY OF REMON
30 32 52 Sg 61 SHORT PLAT 076-81
REC. N0. 811=9003
60 I
31
PARUI B PARCEL A .
CITY OF wqw '
LOT LINE AD,ll1STLOff
WA-01—t81—LLA ^ 'U N P LATTED
PIEC. NO. 2001100990001
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. 3611
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
APPROVING FINAL PLAT (THE VINEYARDS PLAT; FILE NO. LUA-02-
123FP)
WHEREAS, a petition for the approval of a final plat for the subdivision of a certain tract
of land as hereinafter more particularly described, located within the City of Renton, has
heretofore been duly approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department; and
WHEREAS, after due investigation the Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public
Works Department has considered and recommended the approval of said final plat, and such
approval being deemed proper and advisable and in the public interest; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that appropriate provisions are made for
the public health, safety, and general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or
roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and
recreation, playgrounds, schools and schoolgrounds and all other relevant facts, including
sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who walk
to and from school; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the public use and interest will be
served by the platting of such subdivision and dedication;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects.
1
RESOLUTION NO.
F I
SECTION H. The final plat heretofore submitted and approved by the
Planning/Building/Public Works Department pertaining to the following described real estate, to
wit:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth
(The property, consisting of approximately 7.32 acres, is located in the vicinity of
Union Avenue NE and NE e Street)
be and the same is hereby approved as such plat, subject to the laws and ordinances of the City of
Renton, and subject to the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the
Planning/Building/Public Works Department dated December 1, 2002.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RES.960:12/16/02:ma
day of 2002.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
day of , 2002.
Jesse Tanner, Mayor
2
THE VINEYARDS PLAT
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
PARCEL A:
THE SOUTH 120 FEET OF THE EAST 150 FEET OF THE EAST TWO ACRES OF THE SOUTH HALF
OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER
OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN. IN KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTON;
PARCEL B:
THE EAST TWO ACRES OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST
QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST.
WILUAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
EXCEPT -THE SOUTH 120 FEET THEREOF;
EXCEPT .THE NORTH 110 FEET THEREOF;
PARCEL C:
THE NORTH 299 FEET OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5. EAST, W.M.
IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
EXCEPT THE WEST 153 FEET THEREOF.
(ALSO KNOWN AS LOT 2. CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER
LUA 98-148-LLA, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9903029027).
PARCEL 0:
THE NORTH 124 FEET OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST
QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION. 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST,
WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
EXCEPT THE WEST 330 FEET THEREOF;
ALSO THAT PORTION OF THE EAST 252 FEET OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER
OF. THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10. LYING
SOUTHERLY, OF THE NORTH 124 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION AND LYING NORTHERLY OF A LINE
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 10;
THENCE NORTH 1650.00 FEET;
THENCE EAST 660 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 175.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID DESCRIBED LINE;
THENCE WEST 252 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 252 FEET OF
SAID SUBDIVISION AND THE TERMINUS OF SAID LINE.
PARCEL E:
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER
OF THE SOUTHWEST. QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23. NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST,
WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING WITHIN THE FOLLOWING
DESCRIBED PREMISES:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 10;
THENCE NORTH 1650 FEET TO THE TRUE•POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE EAST 660 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 175 FEET;
THENCE WEST 252 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 159 FEET;
THENCE WEST 408 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION;
THENCE SOUTH 16 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET FOR ROAD.
PARCEL F:
THE NORTH 110 FEET OF THE EAST,TWO ACRES OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10.
TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON,
THE VINEYARDS VICINITY MAP
4 ! tfj II , 1 I
! , ! 3
29 2,4
32 31 30 "26 i s
I ! I I I! I 23 I 22 ! 21 I I 1 I I ! S
28 27' 25 ; 24
.: .....::.
t ��ii;:.` •re'r/wsn i W rMW10� 1 w►MWIO I MIT .a � 19 I
33
>iist: j I I 20 wo rMpr 8
i
TRACT 'D' (N.C.P,E,)i' :°`, 35 38 37 I 38 39 I 40 41 42
i j i i ► i
R WEILANO P� yp ISM wei> I 17
TRACT 'E' RESER A I TRACT 'B'
FOR FUTURE DE%nOP►1EN \ I ' I DRAINAGE
(BE1M ONT HONES INC.) (( jj I Mn x _--^
No 12
--
[S W r lM/L dd1W W MIA' Isl �A' QKVN� lTIl1.G YK � I � . / ' I
OI/JI W 1/6S M�O�lOK, . �M /YSm hOrL WT R MfM'.ED /Y K I .
owmt ! .I I II 14
s ON • suety ITRA��A� TP.E
r we pom � rrovw, 1MD+rrr>ut
A19� assMsq for aa� au � � I
aasnio we wnM Ms al�anwuo[ I I
�� 001IMTO m w Y17erY m+rT
WE Lsm
loins CO
II j aturM Bata I^
I
I I
UNION, AVE. N.E.
�' THEVINEYARDS PROJECT SITE
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. 3W 2-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
APPROVING MATRICULA CONSULAR IDENTIFICATION AS LEGAL
ID FOR MEXICAN CITIZENS.
WHEREAS, there are Mexican nationals residing in Renton who do not possess a form
of identification issued by a United State federal or state agency; and
WHEREAS, many immigrants are fearful of reporting crimes to the police because they
do not possess proper identification; and
WHEREAS, many immigrants lack access to certain public services because they do not
possess proper identification; and
WHEREAS, 47 cities across the nation, as well as the Mexican Consulate or El
Consulado General de Mexico, issue identification cards to Mexican nationals who have a birth
certificate, a proper form of Mexican identification, and who have been residing in the United
States for at least six months; and
WHEREAS, the Mexican Consular identification cards, or Matricula Consular, are state-
of-the-art and contain various security safeguards designed to prevent falsification; and
WHEREAS, if Mexican citizens possess a Matricula Consular, they are able to establish
their identities to local peace officers and acceptance of that identification would facilitate their
interactions with law enforcement agencies, saving time and lowering costs; and
WHEREAS, if a Mexican citizen possesses a Matricula Consular, he or she will be more
likely to report crimes and cooperate with law enforcement officers if it is an accepted form of
identification; and
1
RESOLUTION NO.
WHEREAS, if a Mexican citizen who possesses a Matricula Consular is able to establish
his or her identity to city personnel, he or she will have better access to public services;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects.
SECTION II. The City Council of the City of Renton, Washington, will accept
the Mexican Consular identification card, known as the "Matricula Consular," as an official form
of identification.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RES.959:12/11/02:ma
day of 2002.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
_ day of , 2002.
Jesse Tanner, Mayor
2
� S+ read ( ri j
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING CHAPTER 4-2, LAND USE DISTRICTS, CHAPTER 4-4,
PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, CHAPTER 4-6, STREET &
UTILITY STANDARDS, CHAPTER 4-7, SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS,
CHAPTER 4-8, PERMITS — GENERAL AND APPEALS, CHAPTER 4-9,
PERMITS - SPECIFIC, AND CHAPTER 4-11, DEFINITIONS; OF TITLE
IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260
ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF
RENTON, WASHINGTON" TO EDIT TEXT REFERENCES AND
IMPLEMENT ADMINISTRATIVE DETERMINATIONS.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. Sections 4-2-070.A through R of Chapter 2, "Land Use Districts,"
of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" are hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit
A, attached.
SECTION H. Section 4-2-110.13 of Chapter 2, "Land Use Districts," of Title IV
(Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the
City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit B, attached.
SECTION III. Section 4-2-110.G of Chapter 2, "Land Use Districts," of Title IV
(Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the
City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit C, attached.
SECTION IV. Section 4-4-010.13 of Chapter 4, "City-wide Property Development
Standards," of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of
General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
ORDINANCE NO.
D. EXEMPTIONS: Household pets as defined in RMC 4-11-160 are a permitted use
in all zones in the City and as such are not regulated by this Section provided they number three
(3) or less.
SECTION V. A new subsection, 4-4-080.B.1.b.i, of Chapter 4, "City-wide
Property Development Standards," of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No.
4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby added,
to read as follows:
i. Exemption: Change of use within a Shopping Center shall not be required to
increase parking capacity.
SECTION VI. Section 4-4-080.F.7.c.iii of Chapter 4, "City-wide Property
Development Standards," of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled
"Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as
follows:
iii. Screening of Adjacent and/or Abutting. Residential Uses Required: A planting
area or berm with landscaping shall be provided on those sides of a parking lot that are adjacent
to or abutting properties used and/or zoned for residential purposes. (See specific zoning
classification.) Such planting shall be subject to the requirements of the zoning development
standards and shall be of a sufficient height to serve as a buffer.
SECTION VII. Section 4-6-040.F.4 of Chapter 6, "Street and Utility Standards,"
of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby deleted.
SECTION VIII. Section 4-6-040.G of Chapter 6, "Street and Utility Standards," of
title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
2
ORDINANCE NO.
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended by adding a new section, 4-6-
040.G.13, to read as follows:
13. Use of Old Sewers: Old building sewers may be used in connection with new
buildings only when they are found, on examination and tests by the Utilities Engineer, to meet
all requirements of this Chapter.
SECTION IX. Section 4-7-170.F.1 of Chapter 7, "Subdivision Regulations," of
Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
Minimum Lot Size and Pipestem Width and Length: The pipestem shall not
exceed one hundred fifty feet (150') in length and not be less than twenty feet (20') in width.
The portion of the lot narrower than eighty percent (80%) of the minimum permitted width shall
not be used for lot area calculations nor for measurement of required front yard setbacks.
SECTION X. Section 4-7-170.F.2. of Chapter 7, "Subdivision Regulations," of
Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
2. Shared Access Requirements: Abutting pipestem lots shall have a shared private
access driveway. A restrictive covenant will be required on both parcels for maintenance of the
pipestem driveway.
SECTION XI. Section 4-8-110.11.2 of Chapter 8, "Permits — General and
Appeals," of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of
General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
2. Place and Time for Filing Appeals: Appeals of decisions by the Land Use Hearing
Examiner must be made directly to the Shorelines Hearings Board. Appeals are made by filing a
3
ORDINANCE NO.
request for the same within twenty-one (21) days of receipt of the final order and by concurrently
filing copies of such request with the Department of Ecology and the Attorney General's office
as provided in section 18(1) of the Shorelines Management Act of 1971.
SECTION XII. Subsection 4-8-120.D.19.k for "Site Plan, Land Use Review, Level
I" of Chapter 8, "Permits — General and Appeals," of Title IV (Development Regulations) of
Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is
hereby amended to read as follows:
k. Footprint of all proposed buildings showing the location of building entrances,
window openings, and landscape features (required for Urban Center Design Overlay District
review packet only).
SECTION XIII. A new subsection 4-8-120.D.19.1 for "Site Plan, Land Use Review,
Level I" of Chapter 8, "Permits — General and Appeals," of Title IV (Development Regulations)
of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton,
Washington" is hereby added, to read as follows, with the remaining subsection renumbered
accordingly as subsection 4-8-120.D.I9.m.
1. Footprint of all abutting and adjacent buildings showing the location of building
entrances, window openings, and landscape features (required for Urban Center Design Overlay
District review packet only).
SECTION XIV. Section 4-9-070.B.1 of Chapter 9, "Permits — Specific," of Title IV
(Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the
City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
1. Exemptions: See WAC 197-11-800.
0
ORDINANCE NO.
SECTION XV. Section 4-9-190.N.5 of Chapter 9, "Permits — Specific," of Title IV
(Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the
City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
5. Final Decision or Recommendation: The decision of the Land Use Hearing
Examiner shall be the final decision of the City on all rescinded applications. A written decision
shall be transmitted to the Department of Ecology, the Attorney General's office, the applicant,
and such other departments or boards of the City as are affected thereby and the legislative body
of the City. For conditional use or variances, Department of Ecology has 30 days to make final
decision followed by a 21-day appeal period.
SECTION XVI. Section 4-11-040, "Dwelling Unit, Attached," of Chapter 11,
".Definitions," of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of
General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
DWELLING UNIT, ATTACHED: See DWELLING, MULTI -FAMILY.
SECTION XVII. Section 4-11-250, "Yard Requirement," of Chapter 11,
"Definitions," of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of
General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
YARD REQUIREMENT: An open space on a lot unoccupied by structures, unless
specifically authorized otherwise. The required yard depth is measured perpendicularly from a
lot line to the outer wall of the structure. In the case where a structure does not have an outer
wall, such as a carport, the measurement shall be to the posts of such structure, unless otherwise
determined by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division shall
determine the various requirements for uniquely shaped lots and pipestem lots.
ORDINANCE NO.
A. Front Yard: The yard requirement which separates the structure(s) from public
right-of-way. For through lots, corner lots, and lots without street frontage, the front yard will be
determined by the Development Services Division Director.
B. Side Yard Along A Street: The yard requirement which is neither a front yard nor
a rear yard, yet it abuts a street right-of-way.
C. Rear Yard: The yard requirement opposite the front yard. Where a lot abuts an
alley, the rear yard shall always be the yard abutting the alley. For irregularly shaped lots, the
rear yard shall be measured from an imaginary line at least fifteen feet (15') in length located
entirely within the lot and farthest removed and parallel to the front lot line or its tangent.
D. Side Yard: The yard requirement which is not a front yard, a side yard along a
street, or a rear yard.
SECTION XV11I. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and.
30 days after its publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication: _
ORD. 1024:12/11/02:ma
day of , 2002.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
day of 32002.
Jesse Tanner, Mayor
G6i
ATTACHMENT "A"
4-2-070A RESOURCE CONSERVATION (RC)
USES: TYPE:
AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL
SOURCES
Agriculture
P
Natural resource extraction/recovery
H
ANIMALS & RELATED USES
Animal husbandry (20 or fewer small
animals per acre
P #51
Animal husbandry (4 or fewer
medium animals per acre
P #51
Animal husbandry (maximum of 1
large animal per acre
P #51
Greater number of animals than
Mowed above
H #36
Beekeeping
P #35
Kennels
AD #37
Kennels, hobby
AC #37
Pets, common household, up to 3 per
welling unit or business
establishment
AC
Stables, commercial
AD #37
SIDENTIAL
Detached dwelling P #19
Manufactured Homes
Manufactured homes, designated P #19
OTHER RESIDENTIAL, LODGING AND
HOME OCCUPATIONS
Accessory dwelling unit
AD #7
Adult family home
P
Group homes II for 6 or less
P
Group homes II for 7 or more
P
Home occupations
AC #6
Retirement residences
H
ARKS
Parks, neighborhood
P
Parks, regional/community, existing
P
Parks, regional/community, new
AD
OTHER COMMUNITY & PUBLIC
ACILITIES
Community Facilities
Cemetery
H
Religious institutions
H
Service and social organizations
H
Public Facilities
City government facilities
H
Other government offices and
facilities
H
OFFICE AND CONFERENCE
Veterinary offices/clinics P
TAIL
Eating and drinking establishments
P #1
Horticultural nurseries
H
NTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION
Entertainment
Cultural facilities H
Recreation
Golf courses existing
P
Golf courses (new)
H
SERVICES
Services, General
Bed and breakfast house, accessory
AD
Bed and breakfast house, professional
AD
Day Care Services
Adult day care I
AC
Adult day care II
H
Day care centers
H #25
Family day care
AC
ealthcare Services
Convalescent centers
H
Medical institutions
H
TILITIES
Communications broadcast and relay
towers
H
Utilities, small
P
Utilities, medium
AD
Utilities, large
H
TYPES: Blank --Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
4-2-070A RESOURCE CONSERVATION (RC)
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
ACILITIES
Macro facility antennas
AD #46
Micro facility antennas
P
Mini facility antennas
P #44
Minor modifications to existing
fireless communication facilities
P #49
Monopole I support structures
H #45
GENERAL ACCESSORY USES
Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-050 and
s defined in RMC 4-11, where not
otherwise listed in the Use Table
AC
TEMPORARY USE
Sales/marketing trailers, onsite
P #53
Temporary or manufactured buildings
used for construction
P #10
Temporary uses
P #53
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
2
4-2-070B RESIDENTIAL-1 MAC (R-1)
USES: TYPE:
AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL
SOURCES
Agriculture
P
atural resource extraction/recovery
H
ANIMALS & RELATED USES
Animal husbandry (20 or fewer small
animals per acre
P #51
Animal husbandry (4 or fewer
medium animals per acre
P #51
Animal husbandry (maximum of 1
large animal per acre
P #51
Greater number of animals than
allowed above
H #36
Beekeeping
P #35
Kennels, hobby
AC #37
Pets, common household, up to 3 per
welling unit or business
establishment
AC
Stables, commercial
AD #37
SIDENTIAL
Detached dwelling
P #19
Flats or townhouses, no greater than 2
nits total per building (existing legal)
P
anu actured Homes
Manufactured homes, designated P #19
OTHER RESIDENTIAL, LODGING AND
HOME OCCUPATIONS
Adult family home
P
Group homes II for 6 or less
P
Group homes II for 7 or more
H
Home occupations
AC #6
Retirement residences
H
SCHOOLS
-12 educational institution (public or
private)
H #9
-12 educational institution (public or
private), existing
P #9
ARKS
Parks, neighborhood
I P
Parks, regional/community, existing
P
Parks, regional/community, new
AD
OTHER COMMUNITY & PUBLIC
ACILITIES
Community Facilities
Cemetery
H
Religious institutions
H
Service and social organizations
H
Public Facilities
City government offices
AD
City government facilities
H
Other government offices and
facilities
H
TAIL
Eating and drinking establishments
P #1
Horticultural nurseries 4H
NTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION
Entertainment
Cultural facilities H
Recreation
Golf courses (existing)
P
Golf courses new
P
Marinas
P
SERVICES
Services, General
Bed and breakfast house, accessory
AD
Bed and breakfast house, professional
AD
Day Care Services
Adult day care I
AC
Adult day care II
H
Day care centers
H #25
Family day care
AC
Healthcare Services
Convalescent centers
H
Medical institutions
H
TILITIES
Communications broadcast and relay
towers
H
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
3
4-2-070B RESIDENTIAL-1 DU/AC (R-1)
Utilities, small
P
Utilities, medium
AD
Utilities, large
H
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
ACILITIES
Macro facility antennas
AD #46
Micro facility antennas
P
Mini facility antennas
P #44
Minor modifications to existing
fireless communication facilities
P #49
Monopole I support structures
H #45
GENERAL ACCESSORY USES
Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-050 and
s defined in RMC 4-11, where not
otherwise listed in the Use Table
AC
TEMPORARY USE
Model homes in an approved
residential development: one model
home on an existing lot
P #53
Sales/marketing trailers, onsite
P #53
Temporary or manufactured buildings
used for construction
P #10
Temporary uses
P #53
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
4-2-070C RESIDENTIAL-5 MAC (R-5)
USES: TYPE:
AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL
SOURCES
Natural resource extraction/recovery H
ANIMALS & RELATED USES
Animal husbandry (20 or fewer small
animals per acre
P #51
Animal husbandry (4 or fewer
medium animals per acre)
P #51
Animal husbandry (maximum of 1
large animal per acre)
P #51
Greater number of animals than
allowed above
H #36
Beekeeping
P #35
Kennels, hobby
AC #37
Pets, common household, up to 3 per
welling unit or business
establishment
AC
SIDENTIAL
Detached dwelling
P #19
Flats or townhouses, no greater than 2
nits total per building (existing legal)
P
Manufactured Homes
Manufactured homes, designated P #19
OTHER RESIDENTIAL, LODGING AND
HOME OCCUPATIONS
Adult family home
P
Group homes H for 6 or less
P
Group homes II for 7 or more
H
Home occupations
AC #6
SCHOOLS
-12 educational institution (public or
private)
H #9
-12 educational institution (public or
private), existing
P #9
ARKS
Parks, neighborhood
P
Parks, regional/community, existing
P
Parks, regional/community, new
AD
OTHER COMMUNITY & PUBLIC
ACILITIES
Community Facilities
Cemetery
H
Religious institutions
H
Service and social organizations
H
Public Facilities
City government offices
AD
City government facilities
H
Other government offices and
facilities
H
TAIL
Eating and drinking establishments
P #1
Horticultural nurseries
H
NTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION
Entertainment
Cultural facilities H
Recreation
Golf courses (existing)
P
Golf courses (new)
H
SERVICES
Services, General
Bed and breakfast house, accessoryAD
Day Care Services
Adult day care I
AC
Adult day care II
H
Day care centers
H #25
Family day care
AC
ealthcare Services
Medical institutions H
TILITIES
Communications broadcast and relay
towers
H
Utilities, small
P
Utilities, medium
AD
Utilities, large
H
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
ACILITIES
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
5
4-2-070C RESIDENTIAL-5 DU/AC (R-5)
Macro facility antennas
AD #46
Micro facility antennas
P
Mini facility antennas
P #44
Minor modifications to existing
fireless communication facilities
P #49
Monopole I support structures
H #45
GENERAL ACCESSORY USES
Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-050 and
s defined in RMC 4-11, where not
otherwise listed in the Use Table
AC
TEMPORARY USE
Model homes in an approved
residential development: one model
home on an existing lot
P #53
Sales/marketing trailers, onsite
P #53
Temporary or manufactured buildings
used for construction
P #10
Temporary uses
P #53
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
on
4-2-070D RESIDENTIAL-8 (R-8)
USES: TYPE:
AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL
SOURCES
Natural resource extraction/recovery H
ANIMALS & RELATED USES
Animal husbandry (20 or fewer small
animals per acre
P #51
Animal husbandry (4 or fewer
medium animals per acre)
P #51
Animal husbandry (maximum of 1
large animal per acre)
P #51
Greater number of animals than
allowed above
H #36
Beekeeping
P #35
Kennels, hobby
AC #37
Pets, common household, up to 3 per
welling unit or business
establishment
AC
SIDENTIAL
Detached dwelling
P #19
Flats or townhouses, no greater than 2
nits total per building (existing legal)
P
Manufactured Homes
Manufactured homes, designated P #19
OTHER RESIDENTIAL, LODGING AND
HOME OCCUPATIONS
Adult family home
P
Group homes II for 6 or less
P
Group homes II for 7 or more
H
Home occupations
AC #6
SCHOOLS
-12 educational institution (public or
private)
H #9
-12 educational institution (public or
private), existing
P #9
ARKS
Parks, neighborhood
P
Parks, regional/community, existing
P
Parks, regional/community, new
AD
OTHER COMMUNITY & PUBLIC
ACILITIES
Community Facilities
Cemetery
H
Religious institutions
H
Service and social organizations
H
Public Facilities
City government offices
AD
City government facilities
H
Other government offices and
facilities
H
TAIL
Eating and drinking establishments
P #1
Horticultural nurseries
H
ENTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION
Entertainment
Cultural facilities
H
Recreation
Golf courses (existing)
P
Golf courses new
H
SERVICES
Services, General
Bed and breakfast house, accessory AD
Day Care Services
Adult day care I
AC
Adult day care II
H
Day care centers
H #25
Family day care
AC
Healthcare Services
Medical institutions H
TILITIES
Communications broadcast and relay
towers
H
Utilities, small
P
Utilities, medium
AD
Utilities, large
H
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
ACILITIES
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-M20, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
7
4-2-070D RESIDENTIAL-8 (R-8)
Macro facility antennas
AD #46
Micro facility antennas
P
Mini facility antennas
P #44
Minor modifications to existing
fireless communication facilities
P #49
Monopole I support structures
H #45
GENERAL ACCESSORY USES
Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-050 and
s defined in RMC 4-11, where not
otherwise listed in the Use Table
AC
TEMPORARY USE
Model homes in an approved
residential development: one model
home on an existing lot
P #53
Sales/marketing trailers, onsite
P #53
Temporary or manufactured buildings
used for construction
P #10
Temporary uses
P #53
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
4-2-070E RESIDENTIAL MANUFACTURED HOMES (RMH)
USES: TYPE:
AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL
SOURCES
Natural resource extraction/recovery H
ANIMALS & RELATED USES
Kennels, hobby
AC #37
Pets, common household, up to 3 per
welling unit or business
establishment
AC
SIDENTIAL
Manufactured Homes
Manufactured homes
P #19
Manufactured homes, designated
P #19
Mobile homes
P #19
OTHER RESIDENTIAL, LODGING AND
HOME OCCUPATIONS
Adult family home
P
Caretaker's residence
AC
Group homes II for 6 or less
P
Group homes II for 7 or more
H
Home occupations
AC #6
SCHOOLS
-12 educational institution (public or
private)
H #9
-12 educational institution- (public or
private), existing
P #9
ARKS
Parks, neighborhood
P
Parks, regional/community, existing
P
Parks, regional1community, new
AD
OTHER COMMUNITY & PUBLIC
ACILITIES
Community Facilities
Cemetery
H
Religious institutions
H
Service and social organizations
H
Public Facilities
City government offices AD
City government facilities
H
Other government offices & facilities
H
TAIL
Eating and drinking establishments
P #1
Horticultural nurseries
H
ENTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION
Entertainment
Cultural facilities H
Recreation
Golf courses (existing)
P
Golf courses (new)
H
SERVICES
Day Care Services
Adult day care I
AC
Adult day care II
H
Day care centers
H #25
Family day care
AC
Healthcare Services
Medical institutions H
TILITIES
ommunications broadcast and relay
towers
H
Utilities, small
P
Utilities, medium
AD
Utilities, large
H
IRELESS COMMUNICATION
ACILITIES
Macro facility antennas
AD #46
Micro facility antennas
P
Mini facility antennas
P #44
Minor modifications to existing
fireless communication facilities
P #49
Monopole I support structures
H #45
GENERAL ACCESSORY USES
Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-050 and
s defined in RMC 4-11, where not
therwise listed in the Use Table
AC
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
E
4-2-070E RESIDENTIAL MANUFACTURED HOMES (RMH)
TEMPORARY USE
Model homes in an approved
residential development: one model
home on an existing lot
P #53
Sales/marketing trailers, onsite
P #53
Temporary or manufactured buildings
used for construction
P #10
Temporary uses
P #53
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Pemutted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
10
4-2-07OF RESIDENTIAL-10 (R-10)
USES: TYPE:
AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL
SOURCES
Natural resource extraction/recovery H
ANIMALS & RELATED USES
Animal husbandry (20 or fewer small
animals per acre
P #51
Animal husbandry (4 or fewer
medium animals per acre)
P #51
Animal husbandry (maximum of 1
large animal per acre)
P #51
Greater number of animals than
flowed above
H #36
Kennels, hobby
AC #37
Pets, common household, up to 3 per
welling unit or business
stablishment
AC
SIDENTIAL
Detached dwelling
P #19
Semi -attached dwelling
P #19
Attached dwelling
P #50
Flats or townhouses (existing legal)
P
Flats or townhouses, no greater than 2
nits total per building (existing le al
P
anu actured Homes
Manufactured homes, designated P #19
OTHER RESIDENTIAL, LODGING AND
HOME OCCUPATIONS
Adult family home
P
Group homes II for 6 or less
P
Group homes II for 7 or more
H
Home occupations
AC #6
Retirement residences
AD
SCHOOLS
-12 educational institution (public or
private)
H ##9
-12 educational institution (public or
private), existing
P #9
ARKS
Parks, neighborhood
I P
Parks, regional/community, existing
P
Parks, regional/community, new
AD
OTHER COMMUNITY & PUBLIC
ACILITIES
Community Facilities
Cemetery
H
Religious institutions
H
Service and social organizations
H
Public Facilities
City government offices
AD
City government facilities
H
Other government offices and
facilities
H
TAIL
Eating and drinking establishments
P #1
Horticultural nurseries
H
ENTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION
Entertainment
Cultural facilities H
SERVICES
Services, General
Bed and breakfast house, accessory AD
Day Care Services
Adult day care I
AC
Adult day care II
H
Day care centers
H #25
Family day care
AC
Healthcare Services
Convalescent centers
H
Medical institutions
H
TILITIES
Communications broadcast and relay
owers
H
Utilities, small
P
Utilities, medium
AD
Utilities, large
H
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
11
4-2-07OF RESIDENTIAL-10 (R-10)
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
ACILITIES
Macro facility antennas
AD #46
Micro facility antennas
P
Mini facility antennas
P #44
Minor modifications to existing
fireless communication facilities
P #49
Monopole I support structures
H #45
GENERAL ACCESSORY USES
Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-050 and
s defined in RMC 4-11, where not
otherwise listed in the Use Table
AC
TEMPORARY USE
Model homes in an approved
residential development: one model
ome on an existing lot
P #53
Sales/marketing trailers, onsite
P #53
Temporary or manufactured buildings
used for construction
P #10
Temporary uses
P #53
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permtted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
12
4-2-07OG RESIDENTIAL-14 (R-14)
USES: TYPE:
AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL
SOURCES
Natural resource extraction/recovery H
NIMALS & RELATED USES
Kennels, hobby
AC #37
Pets, common household, up to 3 per
welling unit or business
establishment
AC
SIDENTIAL
Detached dwelling
P #19
Semi -attached dwelling
P #19
Attached dwelling
P #50
Manufactured Homes
Manufactured homes, designated P #19
OTHER RESIDENTIAL, LODGING AND
HOME OCCUPATIONS
Adult family home
P
Group homes Il for 6 or less
P
Group homes II for 7 or more
H
Home occupations
AC #6
SCHOOLS
-12 educational institution (public or
private)
H #9
-12 educational institution (public or
private), existing
P #9
ARKS
Parks, neighborhood
P
Parks, regional/community, existing
P
Parks, regional/community, new
AD
OTHER COMMUNITY & PUBLIC
ACILITIES
Community Facilities
Cemetery
H
Religious institutions
H
Service and social organizations
H
Public Facilities
City government offices AD
City government facilities
H
Other government offices and
facilities
H
TAIL
Eating and drinking establishments
H #33
Horticultural nurseries
H
Retail sales
H #33
ENTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION
Entertainment
Cultural facilities
H
Recreation
Recreational facilities, indoor
P #33
Recreational facilities, outdoor
P #33
SERVICES
Services, General
Bed and breakfast house, accesso
AD
On -site services
H #33
Day Care Services
Adult day care I
AC
Adult day care H
H #33
Day care centers
H #33
Family day care
AC
Healthcare Services
Convalescent centers
H
Medical institutions
H
TILITIES
Communications broadcast and relay
towers
H
Utilities, small
P
Utilities, medium
AD
Utilities, large
H
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
ACILITIES
Macro facility antennas
AD #46
Micro facility antennas
P
Mini facility antennas
P #44
Minor modifications to existing
fireless communication facilities
P #49
ono ole I support structures
H #45
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
13
4-2-07OG RESIDENTIAL-14 (R-14)
GENERAL ACCESSORY USES
Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-050 and
s defined in RMC 4-11, where not
otherwise listed in the Use Table
AC
TEMPORARY USE
Model homes in an approved
P #53
residential development: one model
home on an existing lot
Sales/marketing trailers, onsite
P #53
emporary or manufactured buildings
P #10
used for construction
Temporary uses
P #53
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
14
4-2-070H RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY (RM)
USES: I TYPE:
AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL
SOURCES
Natural resource extraction/recovery H
IMALS & RELATED USES
Kennels, hobby
AC #3.7
Pets, common household, up to 3 per
welling unit or business
establishment
AC
SIDENTIAL
Detached dwelling (existing legal)
P
Attached dwelling
P #19
Flats or townhouses (existing legal)
P
Flats or townhouses, no greater than 2
nits total per building (existing legal)
P
OTHER RESIDENTIAL, LODGING AND
HOME OCCUPATIONS
Adult family home
P
Congregate residence
AD
Group homes I1 for 6 or less
P
Group homes II for 7 or more
H
Home occupations
AC #6
Retirement residences
P
SCHOOLS
-12 educational institution (public or
private)
H #9
-12 educational institution (public or
private), existing
P #9
ARKS
Parks, neighborhood
P
Parks, regional/community, existing
P
Parks, regional/community, new
AD
OTHER COMMUNITY & PUBLIC
ACILITIES
Community Facilities
Cemetery
H
eli ious institutions
H
Service and social organizations
H
Public Facilities
City government offices
AD
City government facilities
H
Other government offices and
facilities
H
OFFICE AND CONFERENCE
Medical and dental offices
P #42
Offices, general
P #42
Veterinary offices/clinics
P #42
TAIL
Eating and drinking establishments
P #42
Horticultural nurseries
H
Retail sales
AD
NTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION
Entertainment
Cultural facilities H
SERVICES
Services, General
Bed and breakfast house, accessory
AD
Bed and breakfast house, professional
AD #5
Off -site services
P #42
On -site services
P #42
Day Care Services
Adult day care I
AC
Adult day care II
H
Day care centers
H #25
Family day care
AC
Healthcare Services
Convalescent centers
H
Medical institutions
H
STORAGE
Self-service storage P #8
TILITIES
Communications broadcast and relay
towers
H
Utilities, small
P
Utilities, medium
AD
Utilities, large
H
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
15
4-2-070H RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY (RM)
IRELESS COMMUNICATION
ACILITIES
Lattice towers support structures
H #48
Macro facility antennas
P #44
Micro facility antennas
P
Mini facility antennas
P #44
Minor modifications to existing
fireless communication facilities
P #49
Monopole I support structures
AD #46
Monopole II support structures
H #48
ENERAL ACCESSORY USES
Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-050 and
s defined in RMC 4-11, where not
otherwise listed in the Use Table
AC
TEMPORARY USE
Model homes in an approved
residential development: one model
home on an existing lot
P #53
Sales/marketing trailers, onsite
P #53
Temporary or manufactured buildings
used for construction
P #10
Temporary uses
P #53
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
16
4-2-0701 CONVENIENCE COMMERCIAL (CC)
USES: I TYPE:
AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL
SOURCES
Natural resource extraction/recovery H
ANIMALS & RELATED USES
Kennels,hobby
AC #37
Pets, common household, up to 3 per
welling unit or business
establishment
AC
SIDENTIAL
Detached dwelling (existing legal)
P
Attached dwelling
P #18
OTHER RESIDENTIAL, LODGING AND
HOME OCCUPATIONS
Home occupations AC #6
SCHOOLS
-12 educational institution (public or
private)
H
-12 educational institution (public or
private), existing
P #9
ARKS
Parks, neighborhood
P
Parks, regional/community, existing
P
Parks, regional/community, new
Al)
OTHER COMMUNITY & PUBLIC
ACILITIES
Community Facilities
Cemetery
H
Religious institutions
H
Service and social organizations
H
uhlic Facilities
City government offices
AD
City government facilities
H
Other government offices and
facilities
H
OFFICE AND CONFERENCE
[Offices, general AD #17
TAIL
Drive-in/drive-through, retail
AC
Eating and drinking establishments
P #22
Horticultural nurseries
H
Retail sales
P #60
ENTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION
Entertainment
Cultural facilities AD
SERVICES
Services, General
Bed and breakfast house, accessory
AD
Bed and breakfast house, professional
AD
On -site services
P #63
Drive-in/drive-through service
AC
Day Care Services
Adult day care I
P #22
Adult day care II
P #22
Day care centers
P #22
Family day care
AC
Healthcare Services
Medical institutions H
VEHICLE RELATED ACTIVITIES
Car washes
AD #2
Vehicle fueling stations
AD
Vehicle service and repair, small
AD #2
STORAGE
Indoor storage AC #11
INDUSTRIAL
Solid Waste/Recycling
Recycling collection station P
TILITIES
Communications broadcast and relay
towers
H
Electrical power generation and
cogeneration
H #66
Utilities, small
P
Utilities, medium
I AD
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
17
4-2-0701 CONVENIENCE COMMERCIAL (CC)
Utilities, large
H
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
ACILITIES
Lattice towers support structures
H #48
Macro facility antennas
P #44
Micro facility antennas
P
Mini facility antennas
P #44
Minor modifications to existing
fireless communication facilities
P #49
Monopole I support structures
AD #46
Monopole II support structures
H #48
GENERAL ACCESSORY USES
Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-050 and
s defined in RMC 4-11, where not
otherwise listed in the Use Table
AC
TEMPORARY USE
Model homes in an approved
residential development: one model
home on an existing lot
P #53
Sales/marketing trailers, onsite
P #53
Temporary or manufactured buildings
used for construction
P #10
Temporary uses
P #53
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Pernutted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height, and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
18
4-2-070J CENTER NEIGHBORHOOD (CN)
USES: TYPE:
AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL
SOURCES
Natural resource extraction/recovery H
NIMALS & RELATED USES
Kennels, hobby
AC #37
Pets, common household, up to 3 per
welling unit or business
establishment
AC
SIDENTIAL
Detached dwelling
P #20
Semi -attached dwelling
P #20
Attached dwelling
P #20
Flats or townhouses(existing legal)
P
Flats or townhouses, no greater than 2
nits total per building (existing legal)
P
OTHER RESIDENTIAL, LODGING AND
HOME OCCUPATIONS
Adult family home
P #20
Congregate residence
P #20
Group homes II for 6 or less
P #20
Group homes II for 7 or more
P #20
Home occupations
AC #6
Retirement residences
P #20
SCHOOLS
-12 educational institution (public or
private)
H #9
-12 educational institution (public or
private), existing
P #9
Schools/studios, arts and crafts
P #22
ARKS
Parks, neighborhood
P
Parks, regional/community, existing
P
Parks, regional/community, new
AD
OTHER COMMUNITY & PUBLIC
ACILITIES
Community Facilities
Cemetery H
Religious institutions
H
Service and social organizations
H
Public Facilities
City government offices
AD
City government facilities
H
Other government offices and
facilities
H
OFFICE AND CONFERENCE
Medical and dental offices
AD #22
Offices, general
P #22
Veterinary offices/clinics
AD #22
TAIL
Adult retail use
P #43
Drive-in/drive-through, retail
AC
Eating and drinking establishments
P #22
Horticultural nurseries
H
Retail sales
P #68
Retail sales, outdoor
P #15
Taverns
AD
NTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION
Entertainment
Adult entertainment business
P #43
Cultural facilities
AD
Recreation
Recreation facilities, indoor P #22
SERVICES
Services, General
On -site services
P #69
Drive-in/drive-through service
AC
Vehicle rental, small
AD
Day Care Services
Adult day care I
P #22
Adult day care I1
P #22
Day care centers
P #22
Family day care
AC
Healthcare Services
Convalescent centers
P #22
Medical institutions I
H
VEHICLE RELATED ACTIVITIES
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
19
4-2-070J CENTER NEIGHBORHOOD (CN)
Car washes
P #22
Parking garage, structured,
commercial or public
AD #22
Parking, surface, commercial or
public
AD
Vehicle fueling stations
P
Vehicle service and repair, small
P
STORAGE
Indoor storage
AC #11
Self-service storage
H #26
INDUSTRIAL
oUd Wastell?ecycling
Recycling collection station P
TILITIES
Communications broadcast and relay
towers
H
Electrical power generation and
cogeneration
H #66
Utilities, small
P
Utilities, medium
AD
Utilities, large
H
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
ACILITIES
Lattice towers support structures
H #48
Macro facility antennas
P #44
Micro facility antennas
P
Mini facility antennas
P #44
Minor modifications to existing
fireless communication facilities
P #49
Monopole I support structures
AD #46
Monopole II support structures
H #48
GENERAL ACCESSORY USES
Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-050 and
s defined in RMC 4-11, where not
otherwise listed in the Use Table
AC
TEMPORARY USE
Model homes in an approved
residential development: one model
home on an existing lot
P #53
Sales/marketing trailers, onsite
P #53
Temporary or manufactured buildings
used for construction
P #10
Temporary uses
P #53
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
20
4-2-070K CENTER SUBURBAN (CS)
USES: I TYPE:
AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL
SOURCES
Natural resource extraction/recoveryH
ANIMALS & RELATED USES
Kennels, hobby
AC #37
Pets, common household, up to 3 per
welling unit or business
establishment
AC
SIDENTIAL
Detached dwelling
P #20
Semi -attached dwelling
P #20
Attached dwelling
P #20
Flats or townhouses (existing legal)
P
Flats or townhouses, no greater than 2
nits total per building (existing legal)
P
OTHER RESIDENTIAL, LODGING AND
HOME OCCUPATIONS
Adult family home
P #20
Congregate residence
P #20
Group homes II for 6 or less
P #20
Group homes II for 7 or more
P #20
Home occupations
AC #6
Retirement residences
P #20
SCHOOLS
-12 educational institution (public or
private)
H #9
-12 educational institution (public or
private), existing
P #9
Schools/studios, arts and crafts
P #22
ARKS
Parks, neighborhood
P
Parks, regional/community, existin
P
Parks, regional/community, new
AD
OTHER COMMUNITY & PUBLIC
ACILITIES
Comm unity Facilities
Cemetery H
Religious institutions
H
Service and social organizations
H
Public Facilities
City government offices
AD
City government facilities
H
Other government offices and
facilities
H
OFFICE AND CONFERENCE
Medical and dental offices
P #22
Offices, general
P #22
Veterinary offices/clinics
P #22
TAIL
Adult retail use
P #43
Drive-in/drive-through, retail
AC
Eating and drinking establishments
P #22
Horticultural nurseries
H
Retail sales
P #22
Retail sales, outdoor
P #15
Taverns
AD
ENTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION
Entertainment
Adult entertainment business
P #43
Cultural facilities
AD
Dance clubs
AD #22
ance halls
AD #22
Recreation
Recreation facilities, indoor P #22
SERVICES
Services, General
Hotel
P #22
Motel
P #22
On -site services
P #22
Drive-in/drive-through service
AC
Day Care Services
Adult day care I
P #22
Adult day care II
P #22
Day care centers
P #22
Family day care
AC
ealthcare Services
onvalescent centers P #22
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Pemvtted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
21
4-2-070K CENTER SUBURBAN (CS)
Medical institutions H
VEHICLE RELATED ACTIVITIES
Car washes
P #22
Express transportation services
AD #22
Parking garage, structured,
commercial or public
P #22
Parking, surface, commercial or
public
P
Vehicle fueling stations
P
Vehicle service and repair, small
P
STORAGE
Indoor storage
AC #1 l
Outdoor storage
AD #64
Self-service storage
H #26
INDUSTRIAL
Industrial, General
Laboratories: light manufacturing AD #22
Solid Waste/Recycling
Recycling collection station P
TILITIES
Communications broadcast and relay
towers
H
Electrical power generation and
cogeneration
H #66
Utilities, small
P
Utilities, medium
AD
Utilities, large
H
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
ACILITIES
Lattice towers support structures
H #48
Macro facility antennas
P #44
Micro facility antennas
P
Mini facility antennas
P #44
Minor modifications to existing
fireless communication facilities
P #49
Monopole I support structures
P #44
Monopole II support structures
H #48
GENERAL ACCESSORY USES
Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-050 and
s defined in RMC 4-11, where not
otherwise listed in the Use Table
AC
TEMPORARY USE
Model homes in an approved
residential development: one model
home on an existing lot
P #53
Sales/marketing trailers, onsite
P #53
Temporary or manufactured buildings
used for construction
P #10
em orary uses
P #53
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
22
ARKS
Parks, neighborhood
P
Parks, regional/community, existing
P
Parks, regional/community, new
AD
OTHER COMMUNITY & PUBLIC
ACILITIES
Community Facilities
Cemetery
H
Religious institutions
H
Service and social organizations
H
Public Facilities
City government offices
AD
City government facilities
H
Other government offices and
facilities
H
OFFICE AND CONFERENCE
Conference Center
P #38
Medical and dental offices
P
Offices, general
P
Veterinary offices/clinics
P
TAIL
Adult retail use
P #43
Big -box retail
P
Drive-in/drive-through, retail
AC
Eating and drinking establishments
P
Horticultural nurseries
H
Retail sales
P
Retail sales, outdoor
P
Taverns
P
Vehicle sales, large
P #41
Vehicle sales, small
P
ENTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION
Entertainment
Adult entertainment business
P #43
Card room
P #52
Cultural facilities
AD
Dance clubs
P
Dance halls
P
Gaming/gambling facilities, not -for-
profit
H
Movie theaters
P
Sports arenas, auditoriums, exhibition
halls, indoor
P
Sports arenas, auditoriums, exhibition
halls, outdoor
AD
Recreation
Recreation facilities, indoor
P
Recreational facilities, outdoor
H
SERVICES
Services, General
Hotel
P
Motel
P
Off -site services
P #38
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Pemvtted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
23
4-2-070L COMMERCIAL ARTERIAL (CA)
On -site services
P
Drive-in/drive-through service
AC
Vehicle rental, small
P
Day Care Services
Adult day care I
P
Adult day care H
P
Day care centers
P
Family day care
AC
Healthcare Services
Convalescent centers
H
Medical institutions
H
HICLE RELATED ACTIVITIES
Body shops
H #31
Car washes
P
Express transportation services
AD
Parking garage, structured,
commercial or public
P
Parking, surface, commercial or
public
P
Transit centers
H
Vehicle fueling stations
P
Vehicle service and repair, small
P
Air Transportation Uses
eli ads, accessory to primary use
H
STORAGE
Indoor storage
AC #1 l
Outdoor storage
P #64
Self-service storage
H
Vehicle storage
AD #38
INDUSTRIAL
ndustrial, General
Laboratories: light manufacturing
P
Laboratories: research, development
and testing
P
Manufacturing and fabrication, light
H
Solid Waste/Recycling
Recycling collection station and
processing center
P #38
ec cling collection station
P
TILITIES
Communications broadcast and relay
towers
H
Electrical power generation and
cogeneration
H #66
Utilities, small
P
Utilities, medium
AD
Utilities, large
H
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
ACILITIES
Lattice towers support structures
AD #47
Macro facility antennas
P #44
Micro facility antennas
P
Mini facility antennas
P #44
Minor modifications to existing
fireless communication facilities
P #49
Monopole I support structures
P #44
Monopole II support structures
AD #47
GENERAL ACCESSORY USES
Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-050 and
s defined in RMC 4-11, where not
otherwise listed in the Use Table
AC
TEMPORARY USE
Model homes in an approved
residential development: one model
home on an existing lot
P #53
Sales/marketing trailers, onsite
P #53
Temporary or manufactured buildings
used for construction
P #10
em orary uses
P #53
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
24
4-2-070M CENTER DOWNTOWN (CD)
USES: I TYPE:
AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL
SOURCES
Natural resource extraction/recovery H
ANIMALS & RELATED USES
Kennels, hobby
AC #37
Pets, common household, up to 3 per
welling unit or business
establishment
AC
SIDENTIAL
Detached dwelling (existing legal)
P
Attached dwelling
P #16
OTHER RESIDENTIAL, LODGING AND
HOME OCCUPATIONS
Adult family home
P #3
Congregate residence
P #3
Group homes I
H #3
Group homes II for 6 or less
P #3
Group homes II for 7 or more
H #3
Home occupations
AC #6
Retirement residences
P #3
SCHOOLS
-12 educational institution (public or
private)
H #9
-12 educational institution (public or
private), existing
P #9
Other higher education institution
P
Schools/studios, arts and crafts
P
ARKS
Parks, neighborhood
P
Parks, regional/community, existing
P
Parks, regional/community, new
AD
OTHER COMMUNITY & PUBLIC
ACILITIES
Community Facilities
Cemetery
H
Religious institutions
H
Service and social organizations
H
Public Facilities
City government offices
AD
City government facilities
H
Other government offices and
facilities
H
OFFICE AND CONFERENCE
Conference Center
P
Medical and dental offices
P
Offices, general
P
Veterinary offices/clinics
P
TAIL
Adult retail use
P #43
Drive-in/drive-through, retail
AC #28
Eating and drinking establishments
P
Horticultural nurseries
H
Retail sales
P
Retail sales, outdoor
P #15
Taverns
AD
ENTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION
Entertainment
Adult entertainment business
P #43
Cultural facilities
AD
Dance clubs
H
Dance halls
H
Movie theaters
P
Sports arenas, auditoriums, exhibition
halls, indoor
P
Recreation
Recreation facilities, indoor P
SERVICES
Services, General
Bed and breakfast house, accessory
P
Bed and breakfast house, professional
P
Hotel
P
On -site services
P
Drive-in/drive-through service
AC #70
Day Care Services
Adult day care I
P
Adult day care II
P
Day care centers
P
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
25
4-2-070M CENTER DOWNTOWN
Family day care AC #3
Healthcare Services
Convalescent centers
P #3
Medical institutions
H
VEHICLE RELATED ACTIVITIES
Parking garage, structured,
commercial or public
P #3
Parking, surface, commercial or
public
P #3
Taxi stand
AD
Transit centers
P
Air Transportation Uses
Municipal airports H
STORAGE
Indoor storage AC # 11
INDUSTRIAL
ndustrial, General
Commercial laundries, existing
P #4
Laboratories: light manufacturing
P #3
Laboratories: research, development
and testing
AD #3
Manufacturing and fabrication, light
H #3
Solid Waste/Recycling
Recycling collection station P
TILITIES
Communications broadcast and relay
towers
H
Blank=Not Allowed
AC=Accessory Use
#=Condition(s)
Electrical power generation and
cogeneration
H #66
Utilities, small
P
Utilities, medium
AD
Utilities, large
H
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
ACILITIES
Lattice towers support structures
H #48
Macro facility antennas
P #44
Micro facility antennas
P
Mini facility antennas
P #44
Minor modifications to existing
fireless communication facilities
P #49
Monopole I support structures
AD #46
Monopole II support structures
H #48
GENERAL ACCESSORY USES
Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-050 and
s defined in RMC 4-11, where not
otherwise listed in the Use Table
AC
TEMPORARY USE
Model homes in an approved
residential development: one model
ome on an existing lot
P #53
Sales/marketing trailers, onsite
P #53
Temporary or manufactured buildings
used for construction
P #10
Temporary uses
P #53
P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
4-2-07ON COMMERCIAL OFFICE (CO)
USES: TYPE:
AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL
SOURCES -
Natural resource extraction/recovery H
ANIMALS & RELATED USES
Pets, common household, up to 3 per
welling unit or business
establishment
AC.
OTHER RESIDENTIAL, LODGING AND
HOME OCCUPATIONS
Retirement residences P #39
SCHOOLS
-12 educational institution (public or
private)
H #9
-12 educational institution (public or
private), existing
P #9
Other higher education institution
P
Schools/studios, arts and crafts
P
ARKS
Parks, neighborhood
P
Parks, regional/community, existing
P
Parks, regional/community, new
AD
OTHER COMMUNITY & PUBLIC
ACILITIES
Community Facilities
Cemetery
H
Religious institutions
H
Service and social organizations
H #12
Public Facilities
City government offices
P
City government facilities
H
Jails, existing municipal
P
Other government offices and
facilities
H
OFFICE AND CONFERENCE
Conference Center
P
Medical and dental offices
P
Offices, general
P
Veterinary offices/clinics P #38
TAIL
Adult retail use
P #43
Eating and drinking establishments
P #12
Horticultural nurseries
H
Retail sales
P #54
ENTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION
Entertainment
Adult entertainment business
P #43
Cultural facilities
AD
Dance clubs
P #38
Dance halls
P #38
Gaming/gambling facilities, not -for-
profit
H #38
Movie theaters
P #12
Sports arenas, auditoriums, exhibition
halls, indoor
P #38
Recreation
Recreation facilities, indoor =P
#65
Recreational facilities, outdoor
H #38
SERVICES
Services, General
Hotel
P #38
On -site services
P #54
Drive-in/drive-through service
AC #61
Day Care Services
Adult day care I
P
Adult day care II
P #12
Day care centers
P
Family day care
AC
Healthcare Services
Convalescent centers
P #39
Medical institutions
P #40
VEHICLE RELATED ACTIVITIES
Parking garage, structured,
commercial or public
P
Parking, surface, commercial or
public
AD
Taxi stand
AD
Transit centers
H #38
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
27
4-2-07ON COMMERCIAL OFFICE (CO)
Vehicle fueling stations P #38
Air Transportation Uses
eli ads, accessory to primary use H
STORAGE
Indoor storage AC #11
INDUSTRIAL
Industrial, General
Laboratories: light manufacturing
AD #54
Laboratories: research, development
and testing
AD
Manufacturing and fabrication, light
H #38
Solid Waste/Recycling
Recycling collection station P
TILITIES
Communications broadcast and relay
towers
H
Electrical power generation and
cogeneration
H #66
Utilities, small
P
Utilities, medium
AD
Utilities, large
H
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
ACILITIES
Lattice towers support structures
AD #47
Macro facility antennas
P #44
Micro facility antennas
P
Mini facility antennas
P #44
Minor modifications to existing
fireless communication facilities
P #41
Monopole I support structures
P #44
Monopole II support structures
AD #47
GENERAL ACCESSORY USES
Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-050 and
s defined in RMC 4-11, where not
otherwise listed in the Use Table
AC
TEMPORARY USE
Sales/marketing trailers, onsite
P #53
Temporary or manufactured buildings
used for construction
P #10
�emporary uses
P #53
TYPES: Blank --Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Pemiitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
28
4-2-0700 CENTER OFFICE RESIDENTIAL (COR)
USES: TYPE:
AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL
SOURCES
Natural resource extraction/recovery H
ANIMALS & RELATED USES
Kennels, hobby
AC #37
Pets, common household, up to 3 per
welling unit or business
establishment
AC
SIDENTIAL
Attached dwellingP #19
OTHER RESIDENTIAL, LODGING AND
HOME OCCUPATIONS
Group homes II for 6 or less
P
Group homes II for 7 or more
AD
Home occupations._
AC #6
Retirement residences
P
SCHOOLS
-12 educational institution (public or
private)
H #9
-12 educational institution (public or
private), existing
P #9
Other higher education institution
P #21
ARKS
Parks, neighborhood
P
Parks, regional/community, existin
P
Parks, regional/community, new
AD
OTHER COMMUNITY & PUBLIC
ACILITIES
Community Facilities
Cemetery
H
Religious institutions
H
Service and social organizations
H #21
Public Facilities
City government offices
AD
City government facilities
H
Other government offices and
facilities
H
OFFICE AND CONFERENCE
Conference Center
P #21
Medical and dental offices
P
O ffices, general
P
Veterinary offices/clinics
P
TAIL
Eating and drinking establishments
P #27
Horticultural nurseries
H
Retail sales
P #21
Taverns
P #21
ENTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION
Entertainment
Cultural facilities
AD
Dance clubs
H
Dance halls
H
Recreation
Golf courses(existing)
P
Golf courses (new)
H
Marinas
P #21
Recreation facilities, indoor
P #21
SERVICES
Services, General
Hotel
P
On -site services
P #21
Drive-in/drive-through service
AC #61
Day Care Services
Adult day care I
P
Adult day care H
P #21
Day care centers
P #21
Family day care
AC
Healthcare Services
Convalescent centers
AD
Medical institutions
H
VEHICLE RELATED ACTIVITIES
Parking garage, structured,
commercial or public
P
Air Transportation Uses
eli ads, accessoryto primaryuse H
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
29
4-2-0700 CENTER OFFICE RESIDENTIAL (COR)
STORAGE
Indoor storage AC # 11
NDUSTRIAL
Industrial, General
Laboratories: research, development
and testing
H
Manufacturing and fabrication, heavy
P #23
Manufacturing and fabrication, light
P #23
Manufacturing and fabrication,
medium
P #23
Solid Waste/Recycling
Recycling collection station P
TILITIES
Communications broadcast and relay
towers
H
Electrical power generation and
cogeneration
H #66
Utilities, small
P
Utilities, medium
AD
Utilities, large
H
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
ACILITIES
Lattice towers support structures
H #48
Macro facility antennas
P #44
Micro facility antennas
P
Mini facility antennas
P #44
Minor modifications to existing
fireless communication facilities
P #49
Monopole I support structures
AD #46
Monopole H support structures
H #48
GENERAL ACCESSORY USES
Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-050 and
s defined in RMC 4-11, where not
otherwise listed in the Use Table
AC
TEMPORARY USE
Model homes in an approved
esidential development: one model
ome on an existing lot
P #53
Sales/marketing trailers, onsite
P #53
Temporary or manufactured buildings
used for construction
P #10
Temporary uses
P #53
TYPES: Blank --Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
30
4-2-070P INDUSTRIAL LIGHT (IL)
USES: I TYPE:
AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL
SOURCES
Natural resource extraction/recovery H
NIMALS & RELATED USES
Kennels
P #37
Kennels, hobby
AC #37
Pets, common household, up to 3 per
welling unit or business
establishment
AC
OTHER RESIDENTIAL, LODGING AND
HOME OCCUPATIONS
Caretaker's residence AC
SCHOOLS
-12 educational institution (public or
private)
H #9
-12 educational institution (public or
private), existing
P #9
Other higher education institution
P #38
Schools/studios, arts and crafts
P
Trade or vocational school
P
ARKS
Parks, neighborhood
P
Parks, regional/community, existing
P
Parks, regional/community, new
AD
OTHER COMMUNITY & PUBLIC
ACILITIES
Community Facilities
Cemetery
H
Religious institutions
H
Service and social organizations
H
Public Facilities
City government offices
AD
City government facilities
H
Other government offices and
facilities
H
OFFICE AND CONFERENCE
Conference Center P #38
Medical and dental offices
P #38
Offices, general
P #13
Veterinary offices/clinics
P #38
TAIL
Adult retail use
P #43
Big -box retail
P
Drive-in/drive-through, retail
AC
Eating and drinking establishments
P
Horticultural nurseries
H
Retail sales
P #34
Retail sales, outdoor
P #30
Vehicle sales, large
P
Vehicle sales, small
P
ENTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION
Entertainment
Adult entertainment business
P #43
Card room
P #52
Cultural facilities
AD
Dance clubs
P #38
Dance halls
P #38
Gaming/gambling facilities, not -for-
profit
H #38
Movie theaters
P #38
Sports arenas, auditoriums, exhibition
halls, indoor
P #38
Sports arenas, auditoriums, exhibition
halls, outdoor
P
Recreation
Recreation facilities, indoor
P8
Recreational facilities, outdoor
P #32
SERVICES
Services, General
Hotel
P #38
Motel
P #38
Off -site services
P #38
On -site services
P #38
Drive-in/drive-through service
AC #62
Vehicle rental, small
P
Vehicle and equipment rental, large.
P #38
Day Care Services
Adult day care I P #55
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
31
4-2-070P INDUSTRIAL LIGHT (IL)
Adult day care II
AD
Day care centers
P #54
Family day care
AC
Healthcare Services
Medical institutions H #56
HICLE RELATED ACTIVITIES
Body shops
P #31
Car washes
P
Express transportation services
AD
Industrial engine or transmission
rebuild
P #31
Parking garage, structured,
commercial or public
P
Parking, surface, commercial or
public
P #38
Transit centers
H #38
Vehicle fueling stations
P
Vehicle service and repair, large
AD
Vehicle service and repair, small
P
Air Transportation Uses
eli ads, accessory to primary use H
STORAGE
Hazardous material, storage, on -site or
offsite, including treatment
H #24
Indoor storage
P
Outdoor storage
P #57
Self-service storage
P #58
Warehousing
P
INDUSTRIAL
Industrial, General
Assembly and/or packaging
operations
P
Commercial laundries, existing
P #38
Commercial laundries, new
P #38
Construction/contractor's office
P #14
Laboratories: light manufacturing
P #38
Laboratories: research, development
and testing
P #31
Manufacturing and fabrication, light
P
Solid Waste/Recycling
Recycling collection station and
processing center
P #14
Recycling collection station
P
TILITIES
Communications broadcast and relay
towers
H #38
Electrical power generation and
cogeneration
H #66
Utilities, small
P
Utilities, medium
AD
Utilities, large
H
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
ACILITIES
Lattice towers support structures
AD #47
Macro facility antennas
P #44
icr facility antennas
P
Mini facility antennas
P #44
Minor modifications to existing
fireless communication facilities
P #49
Monopole I support structures
P #44
Monopole II support structures
AD #47
GENERAL ACCESSORY USES
Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-050 and
s defined in RMC 4-11, where not
otherwise listed in the Use Table
AC
TEMPORARYUSE
Sales/marketing trailers, onsite
P #53
Temporary or manufactured buildings
used for construction
P #10
Temporary uses
P #53
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC. 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
32
4-2-070Q INDUSTRIAL MEDIUM (IM)
USES: TYPE:
AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL
SOURCES
Natural resource extraction/recovery H #59
ANIMALS & RELATED USES
Kennels
P #37
Kennels, hobby
AC #37
Pets, common household, up to 3 per
welling unit or business
establishment
AC
OTHER RESIDENTIAL, LODGING AND
HOME OCCUPATIONS
Caretaker's residence AC
SCHOOLS
-12 educational institution (public or
private)
H
-12 educational institution (public or
private), existing
P #9
Other higher education institution
P #38
Schools/studios, arts and crafts
P #38
Trade or vocational school
P
ARKS
Parks, neighborhood
P
Parks, regional/community, existing
P
Parks, regional/community, new
AD
OTHER COMMUNITY & PUBLIC
ACILITIES
Conim unity Facilities
Cemetery
H
Religious institutions
H
Service and social organizations
H
Public Facilities
City government offices
AD
City government facilities
H
Other government offices and
facilities
H
OFFICE AND CONFERENCE
onference Center P #38
Medical and dental offices
P #38
Offices, general
P #13
Veterinary offices/clinics
P #38
TAIL
Adult retail use
P #43
Big -box retail
P
Drive-in/drive-through, retail
AC
Eating and drinking establishments
P
Horticultural nurseries
H
Retail sales
P #34
Retail sales, outdoor
P #30
Vehicle sales, large
P
Vehicle sales, small
P
ENTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION
Entertainment
Adult entertainment business
P #43
Card room
P #52
Cultural facilities
AD
Dance clubs
P #38
Dance halls
P #38
Gaming/gambling facilities, not -for-
profit
H #29
Movie theaters
P #38
Sports arenas, auditoriums, exhibition
halls, indoor
P #38
Sports arenas, auditoriums, exhibition
halls, outdoor
P #38
Recreation
Recreation facilities, indoor
P #38
Recreational facilities, outdoor
P #32
SERVICES
Services, General
Hotel
P #38
Motel
P #38
Off -site services
P #38
On -site services
P #38
Drive-in/drive-through service
AC #62
Vehicle rental, small
P
Vehicle and equipment rental, large
P #29
Pay Care Services
[Adult day care I P #55
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
33
4-2-070Q INDUSTRIAL MEDIUM (IM)
Adult day care II
AD
Day care centers
P #54
Family day care
AC
Healthcare Services
Medical institutions H #56
VEHICLE RELATED ACTIVITIES
Body shops
P #31
Car washes
P
Express transportation services
P
Fuel dealers
H #59
Industrial engine or transmission
rebuild
P #31
Parking garage, structured,
commercial or public
P
Parking, surface, commercial or
public
P #38
Tow truck operation/auto
impoundment yard
H #59
Transit centers
H #38
Vehicle fueling stations
P
Vehicle service and repair, large
P
Vehicle service and repair, small
P
Wrecking yard, auto
H #59
Air Transportation Uses
eli ads, accessory to primary use
H #38
eli ads, commercial
H
STORAGE
Hazardous material, storage, on -site or
offsite, including treatment
H #24
Indoor storage
P
Outdoor storage
P #57
Self-service storage
P #59
Warehousing
P
INDUSTRIAL
Industrial, General
Assembly and/or packaging
operations
P
Commercial laundries, existing
P #38
Commercial laundries, new
P #38
Construction/contractor's office
P
Laboratories: light manufacturing
P #38
Laboratories: research, development
and testing
P
Manufacturing and fabrication, heavy
H #59
Manufacturing and fabrication, light
P
Manufacturing and fabrication,
medium
P #67
Solid Waste/Recycling
Recycling collection station and
processing center
P #38
Recycling collection station
P
Sewage disposal and treatment plants
H #59
Waste recycling and transfer facilities
H #59
TILITIES
Communications broadcast and relay
towers
H #29
Electrical power generation and
cogeneration
H #66
Utilities, small
P
Utilities, medium
AD
Utilities, large
H
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
ACILITIES
Lattice towers support structures
AD #47
Macro facility antennas
P #44
Micro facility antennas
P
Mini facility antennas
P #44
Minor modifications to existing
el ss communication facilities
P #49
no ole I support structures
Vo
P #44
Monopole II support structures
AD #47
GENERAL ACCESSORY USES
Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-050 and
s defined in RMC 4-11, where not
otherwise listed in the Use Table
AC
TEMPORARY USE
Sales/marketing trailers, onsite
P #53
Temporary or manufactured buildings
used for construction
P #10
[e`mporary uses
P #53
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
34
4-2-07OR INDUSTRIAL HEAVY (IH)
TYPES:
USES: I TYPE:
AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL
SOURCES
Natural resource extraction/recovery H
ANIMALS & RELATED USES
Kennels
P #37
Kennels, hobby
AC #37
Pets, common household, up to 3 per
welling unit or business
establishment
AC
OTHER RESIDENTIAL, LODGING AND
HOME OCCUPATIONS
Caretaker's residence AC
SCHOOLS
-12 educational institution (public or
private)
H
-12 educational institution (public or
private), existing
P #9
Other higher education institution
P #38
Schools/studios, arts and crafts
P #38
Trade or vocational school
H
ARKS
Parks, neighborhood
P
Parks, regional/community, existing
P
Parks, regional/community, new
AD
OTHER COMMUNITY & PUBLIC
FACILITIES
Community Facilities
Cemetery
H
Religious institutions
H
Service and social organizations
H
Public Facilities
City government offices
AD
City government facilities
H
Other government offices and
facilities
H
OFFICE AND CONFERENCE
Conference Center
P #38
Medical and dental offices
P #38
Offices, general
P #13
Veterinary offices/clinics
P #38
TAIL
Adult retail use
P #43
Big -box retail
P
Drive-in/drive-through, retail
AC
Eating and drinking establishments
P
Horticultural nurseries
H
Retail sales
P #34
Retail sales, outdoor
P #30
Vehicle sales, large
P
Vehicle sales, small
P
ENTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION
Entertainment
Adult entertainment business
P #43
Card room
P #52
Cultural facilities
AD
Dance clubs
P #38
Dance halls
P 438
Gaming/gambling facilities, not -for-
profit
H #38
Movie theaters
P #38
Sports arenas, auditoriums, exhibition
halls, indoor
P #38
Sports arenas, auditoriums, exhibition
halls, outdoor
P #38
Recreation
Recreation facilities, indoor
P #38
Recreational facilities, outdoor
P #32
SERVICES
Services, General
Hotel
P #38
Motel
P #38
Off -site services
P #38
On -site services
P #38
Drive-in/drive-through service
AC #62
Vehicle rental, small
P
Vehicle and equipment rental, large
P #29
Day Care Services
Adult day care I
P #55
Adult day care II
H
Day care centers
P #54
Family day care
AC
Healthcare Services
Medical institutions H #56
Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-050.C, Aquifer Protection
Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program
Requirements.
35
4-2-07OR INDUSTRIAL HEAVY (IH)
HICLE RELATED ACTIVITIES
Body shops
P #31
Car washes
P
Fuel dealers
P
Industrial engine or transmission
rebuild
P #31
Parking garage, structured,
commercial or public
P
Parking, surface, commercial or
public
P #38
Railroad yards
P
Tow truck operation/auto
impoundment yard
P
Transit centers
H #38
Truck terminals
P
Vehicle fueling stations
P
Vehicle service and repair, large
P
Vehicle service and repair, small
P
Wrecking yard, auto
H
Air Transportation Uses
Airplane sales and repair
P
eli ads, accessory to pri a use
H #38
STORAGE
Hazardous material, storage, on -site or
offsite, including treatment
H #24
Indoor storage
P
Outdoor storage
P #57
Self-service storage
P
Warehousing
P
INDUSTRIAL
Industrial, General
Assembly and/or packaging
operations
P
Commercial laundries, existing
P #38
Commercial laundries, new
P #38
Construction/contractor's office
P
Laboratories: light manufacturing
P #38
Laboratories: research, development
and testing
P
Manufacturing and fabrication, heavy
P #67
Manufacturing and fabrication, light
P
Manufacturing and fabrication,
medium
P #67
Solid Waste/Rec clip
Recycling collection station and
processing center
P #38
Recycling collection station
P
Sewage disposal and treatment plants
H
Waste recycling and transfer facilities
P
TILITIES
Communications broadcast and relay
towers
H #38
Electrical power generation and
cogeneration
H #66
Utilities, small
P
Utilities, medium
AD
Utilities, large
H
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
ACILITIES
Lattice towers support structures
AD #47
Macro facility antennas
P #44
Micro facility antennas
P
Mini facility antennas
P #44
ino modifications to existing
fireless communication facilities
P #49
Monopole I support structures
P # 4
Monopole II support structures
AD #47
GENERAL ACCESSORY USES
Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-050 and
as defined in RMC 4-11, where not
otherwise listed in the Use Table
AC
TEMPORARY USE
Sales/marketing trailers, onsite
P #53
Temporary or manufactured buildings
used for construction
P #10
Temporary uses
P #53
TYPES: Blank=Not Allowed P=Permitted Use P#=Permitted provided condition can be met
AC=Accessory Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
#=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-
050.C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040.C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement
Districts, and RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Requirements.
36
ATTACHMENT "B"
4-2-110B
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS
(Detached Accessory Structures)9
RC R-1 R-5 R-8
MAXIMUM NUMBER AND SIZE
General
2 structures — max. 720 sq. ft.
2 structures — max. 720 sq. ft.
2 structures, — max. 720 sq. ft.
2 structures — max. 720 sq. ft.
per structure,
per structure,
per structure,
per structure,
Or
Or
Or
Or
1 structure — max. 1,000 sq. ft.
1 structure — max. 1,000 sq. ft.
1 structure - max. 1,000 sq. ft.
1 structure - max. 1,000 sq. ft.
In addition, 1 barn or stable —
In addition, 1 barn or stable —
Accessory structures shall only
Accessory structures shall only
max. 2,000 sq. ft.; provided the
max. 2,000 sq. ft.; provided the
be allowed on lots in
be allowed on lots in
lot is 5 acres or more.
lot is 5 acres or more.
conjunction with a primary
conjunction with a primary
residential use.
residential use.
Accessory structures shall only
Accessory structures shall only
be allowed on lots in
be allowed on lots in
conjunction with a primary
conjunction with a primary
residential use.
residential use.
MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA
General
The total floor area of all
The total floor area of all
The total floor area of all
The total floor area of all
accessory buildings shall not be
accessory buildings shall not be
accessory buildings shall not be
accessory buildings shall not be
greater than the floor area of the
greater than the floor area of the
rester than the floor area of the
greater than the floor area of the
primary residential use. The lot
primary residential use. The lot
primary residential use. The lot
primary residential uses. The lot
overage of the primary
coverage of the primary
coverage of the primary
coverage of the primary
residential structure along with
residential structure along with
residential structure along with
residential structure along with
II accessory buildings shall not
all accessory buildings shall not
all accessory buildings shall not
II accessory buildings shall not
exceed the maximum lot
exceed the maximum lot
exceed the maximum lot
exceed the maximum lot
overage of this Zoning District.
coverage of this Zoning District.
coverage of this Zoning District.
coverage of this Zoning District.
HEIGHT
Maximum Building Height and
Accessory structures — 15 ft.
Accessory structures —15 ft.
Accessory structures —15 ft.
Accessory structures — 15 ft.
Number of Stories except for
and 1 story.
and 1 story.
Public uses having a "Public
Animal husbandry or agricultural
Animal husbandry or agricultural
Suffix" (P) designation 8,9
related structures— 2 stories and
related structures — 2 stories
Animal husbandry related
Animal husbandry related
0 ft.
and 30 ft.
structures — 2 stories and 30 ft.
structures — 2 stories and 30 ft.
MINIMUM SETBACKS
General
6 ft. from any residential
ft. from any residential
6 ft. from any residential
6 ft. from any residential
structure, if sited closer than 6
structure, if sited closer than 6
structure, if sited closer than 6
structure, if sited closer than 6
t., the structure will be
t., the structure will be
ft., the structure will be
ft., the structure will be
considered to be attached.
considered to be attached.
considered to be attached.
considered to be attached.
tables, and other animal
ATTACHMENT `B"
4-2-110B
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS
(Detached Accessory Structures)5
RC
R-1
R-5
R-8
husbandry related structures
Stables, and other animal
Stables, and other animal
Stables, and other animal
ee RMC 4-4-010. Agricultural
husbandry related structures
husbandry related structures
husbandry related structures
related structures — 50 ft. from
see RMC 4-4-010. Agricultural
see RMC 4-4-010.
see RMC 4-4-010.
any property line.
related structures — 50 ft. from
any propertyline.
Side Yards
5 ft. unless located between the
3 ft. unless located between the
3 ft. unless located between the
3 ft. unless located between the
ear of the house and the rear
rear of the house and the rear
rear of the house and the rear
rear of the house and the rear
property line, then 0 ft. side yard
property line, then 0 ft. side yard
property line, then 0 ft. side yard
property line, then 0 ft. side yard
is allowed.
is allowed.
is allowed.
is allowed.
Rear Yards
5 ft., except that garages,
3 ft. unless located between the
3 ft. unless located between the
ft. unless located between the
carports, and parking areas
rear of the house and the rear
rear of the house and the rear
rear of the house and the rear
must be set back from the rear
property line, then 0 ft. rear yard
property line, then 0 ft. rear yard
property line, then 0 ft. rear yard
property lines a sufficient
is allowed. Garages, carports
is allowed. Garages, carports
is allowed. Garages, carports
distance to provide a minimum
nd parking areas must be set
and parking areas must be set
and parking areas must be set
f 24 ft. of back -out room, either
ack from the rear property line
ack from the rear property line
back from the rear property line
on -site or on improved rights -of-
a sufficient distance to provide a
3 sufficient distance to provide a
asufficient distance to provide a
ay, where parking is accessed
inimum of 24 ft. of back -out
minimum of 24 ft. of back -out
minimum of 24 ft. of back -out
from the rear of the lot.
room, either on -site or on
room, either on -site or on
room, either on -site or on
improved rights -of -way, where
improved rights -of -way, where
improved rights -of -way, where
parking is accessed from the
parking is accessed from the
parking is accessed from the
ear of the lot.
rear of the lot.
rear of the lot.
Front Yard/Side Yard Along
Accessory structures are not
Accessory structures are not
Accessory structures are not
Accessory structures are not
Streets
permitted within required front
permitted within required front
permitted within required front
permitted within required front
yards or side yards along
yards or side yards along
yards or side yards along
yards or side yards along
streets.
streets.
streets.
streets.
Clear Vision Area
In no case shall a structure over
In no case shall a structure over
In no case shall a structure over
In no case shall a structure over
2" in height intrude into the 20'
2" in height intrude into the 20'
2" in height intrude into the 20'
2" in height intrude into the 20'
tear vision area defined in
clear vision area defined in
clear vision area defined in
clear vision area defined in
RMC 4-11-030.
RMC 4-11-030.
RMC 4-11-030.
RMC 4-11-030.
PARKING
General
ee RMC 4-4-080.
IS ee RMC 4-4-080.
Isee RMC 4-4-080.
IS ee RMC 4-4-080.
CRITICAL AREAS
General
Isee RMC 4-3-050 and 4-3-090.
ISee RMC 4-3-050 and 4-3-090.
ee RMC 4-3-050 and 4-3-090.
ee RMC 4-3-050 and 4-3-090.
ATTACia_. ENT "C"
4-2-110G
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS
(Detached 12Accessory Structures)
R-10 R-14 RM
MAXIMUM NUMBER AND SIZE
General
structures, up to a maximum of 720
1 per residential unit.
The lot coverage of the primary
q. ft. for each building, or 1 structure up
residential structure along with all
o a maximum of 1,000 sq. ft.
Maximum of 400 sq. ft. and less than
accessory buildings shall not exceed the
he floor area of the principal unit.
maximum lot coverage of this Zoning
The total floor area of all accessory
District.
buildings shall not be greater than the
The lot coverage of the primary
floor area of the residential uses.
residential structure along with all
Accessory structures shall only be
accessory buildings shall not exceed the
(lowed on lots in conjunction with a
The lot coverage of the primary
maximum lot coverage of this Zoning
primary use.
esidential structure along with all
District.
accessory buildings shall not exceed the
Accessory structures shall only be
maximum lot coverage of this Zoning
allowed on lots in conjunction with a
District.
primary use.
Accessory structures shall only be
(lowed on lots in conjunction with a
primary residential use.
LOCATION
General
NA
NA
"U" Suffix
Garages and carports shall only access
from the alley when lots abut an alley.
When lots do not abut an alley, garages
and carports shall be located in the rear
and or side yard.
HEIGHT
Maximum Number of Stories and
1 story and 15 ft.
15 ft.
25 ft., except in the RM-U District where
Maximum Building Height 21
he maximum height shall be
determined through the site plan review
process.
ATTACHMENT "C"
4-2-110G
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS
(Detached12 Accessory Structures)
R-10 R-14 RM
SETBACKS
Minimum Front Yard
Not allowed within the required front
Not allowed within the required front
Not allowed within the required front
yards or side yards along streets.
yards or side yards along streets.
yards or side yards along streets.
Minimum Side Yard
3 ft. unless located between the rear of
Side Yard: None required.
ft. unless located between the rear of
he house and the rear property line,
the house and the rear property line,
hen 0 ft. side yard is allowed. Garages,
then 0 ft. side yard is allowed. Garages,
carports and parking areas must be set
carports and parking areas must be set
back from the rear property line a
back from the rear property line a
sufficient distance to provide a minimum
sufficient distance to provide a minimum
f 24 ft. of back -out room, either on -site
of 24 ft. of back -out room, either on -site
r counting improved alley surface or
or counting improved alley surface or
other improved right-of-way surface.11
other improved right-of-way surface."
Minimum Rear Yard
3 ft. unless located between the rear of
3 ft. unless located between the rear of
ft. unless located between the rear of
he house and the rear property line,
the house and the rear property line,
he house and the rear property line,
hen 0 ft. rear yard is allowed. Garages,
then 0 ft. rear yard is allowed. Garages
hen 0 ft. rear yard is allowed. Garages,
carports and parking areas must be set
and carports must provide a minimum ofcarports
and parking areas must be set
back from the rear property line a
24 ft. of back -out room, either on -site or
back from the rear property lines a
sufficient distance to provide a minimum
counting improved alley surface or other
sufficient distance to provide a minimum
f 24 ft. of back -out room, either on -site
improved right-of-way surface.
of 24 ft. of back -out room, either on -site
r counting improved alley surface or
or counting improved alley surface or
22
other improved right-of-way surface. 11
other improved right-of-way surface.
Special Setbacks for Animal
See RMC 4-4-010.
NA
NA
Husbandry Related Structures
Clear Vision Area
In no case shall a structure over 42" in
In no case shall a structure over 42" in
In no case shall a structure over 42" in
height intrude into the 20' clear vision
height intrude into the 20' clear vision
height intrude into the 20' clear vision
rea defined in RMC 4-11-030.
area defined in RMC 4-11-030.
rea defined in RMC 4-11-030.
CRITICAL AREAS
General ee RMC 4-3-050 and 4-3-090. ee RMC 4-3-050 and 4-3-090. ee RMC 4-3-050 and 4-3-090.
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING SECTION 4-1-180 OF CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION
AND ENFORCEMENT, AND SECTION 4-3-050.P OF CHAPTER 3,
ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS AND SPECIAL DISTRICTS, OF
TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO.
4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY
OF RENTON, WASHINGTON" BY REORGANIZING THE SECTIONS
TO MAKE THEM CONSISTENT WITH TITLE IV'S FORMAT AND TO
BE MORE USER-FRIENDLY.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. Section 4-1-180 of Chapter 1, Administration and Enforcement, of
Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
4-1-180 PUBLIC WORKS FEES:
A. LATECOMER'S AGREEMENT APPLICATION FEES:
The following fees are associated with the application by a developer for a latecomer's
agreement.
Processing fee (Nonrefundable) $500 if amount covered by latecomer's is $20,000 or
Fee to be due and payable at time of application less
$1,000 if amount covered by latecomer's is between
$20,000 and $100,000
$2,000 if amount covered by latecomer's is greater tha
$100,000
Latecomer's Agreement — Administration, 15% of total amount to be collected if amount covered
processing, and collection fee by latecomer is $20,000 or less;
Fee to be collected by deduction from each 10% if amount covered by latecomer is between
individual latecomer fee payment and the $20,000 and $100,000;
balance forwarded to the holder of the 5% if amount covered by latecomer is greater than
latecomer's agreement pursuant to RMC 9-5-9, $100,000;
Tender of Fee.
ORDINANCE NO.
Segregation processing fee, if applicable I $750
B. PUBLIC WORKS PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION FEES:
All developers, municipal or quasi -municipal entities, or utility corporations or
companies, except those specifically exempted, shall pay fees under this Section. Exempted
entities include City -franchised cable TV, cable modem, natural gas, telecommunications, and
electrical power. Half of this fee must be paid upon application and the remainder when the
permit(s) is issued. There are additional construction permit fees which are also payable upon
issuance. The fee will be based upon percentages of the estimated cost of improvements using
the following formula:
2
ORDINANCE NO.
C. PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FEES:
The following public works construction permit fees, utility permit fees, and miscellaneous
charges are payable at or prior to the time of construction permit issuance.
WATER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FEES:
,;k.e' Nei ....,...°._
Water meter tests for 3/4" to 2" meter
i! PIT
$40.00
Water meter tests for meters greater than 2"
Time and materials cost ($60.00 deposit)
Open and close fire hydrants for fire flow tests
conducted by others
Time and materials
Installation fees for ring and cover castings
$200.00
Service size reductions
$50.00
Water service disconnection (cut at main)
$250.00
Meter resets
$50.00
Repair of damage to service
$50.00
Water main connections
$400.00
Water main cut and cap
$1,000.00
Water quality/inspection/purity tests
$40.00 each
Specialty water tests (lead, copper, etc.)
Cost of test plus $40.00 processing fee
Water turn ons/offs after hours
$60.00
Installation of isolation valve
Time and materials $2,000.00 deposit
New water line chlorination fee
$250.00 plus $0.15 per lineal foot for any footage after
the first two hundred fifty (250) lineal feet.
Miscellaneous water installation fees
Time and materials
3
ORDINANCE NO.
2. WATER METER INSTALLATION FEES — CITY INSTALLED: The following - -
fees are payable at the time of application for water meter installation(s).
WIN e eta
3/4" meter installed by City within City limits
$1,300.00 (full installation of stub service and meter)
$240.00 (meter drop in)
3/4" meter installed by City outside City limits
$1,400.00 (full installation of stub service and meter)
$240.00 (meter drop in)
1" meter installed by City
$1,400.00 (full installation of stub service and meter)
$250.00 (meter drop in)
1-1/2" meter installed by City
$2,400.00 (full installation of stub service and meter)
$300.00 (meter drop in)
2" meter installed by City
$2,800.00 (full installation of stub service and meter)
$370.00 (drop in)
3. METER PROCESSING FEES — APPLICANT INSTALLED: For meters larger
than two inches (2"), applicant provides materials and installs. City charges a two hundred
dollar ($200.00) processing fee at the time of meter application.
4. WASTEWATER OR SURFACE WATER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FEES:
`. �V".le.1'cC `f.. .«..,S �. ►7'JC1.. "..�.'.}',' - "v �:. ��
. : �{�.iS P.>.A•L.. '. _: .�'•
' .£..' - , '.�. aM
Residential
$60.00 each connection
$60.00 each connection
Commercial
$80.00 each connection
$80.00 each connection
Industrial
$100.00 each connection
$100.00 each connection
Repair of any of the above
$50.00 each service
$50.00 each connection
Cut and Cap / Demolition Permit
$30.00 each service
$30.00 each service
Ground Water Discharge (Temporary
$150.00
N/A
connection to sanitary sewer system for one
time discharge of contaminated ground
water to 50,000 gallons)
Ground Water Discharge (Temporary
$100.00 + Billed for current
N/A
connection to sanitary sewer system for
Renton and King County
discharge of contaminated ground water
sewer rate on discharged
over 50,000 gallons)
amount. (meter provided by
property owner)
ORDINANCE NO.
5. WORK IN RIGHT-OF-WAY — CONSTRUCTION PERMIT: (Utility and
Street/Sidewalk Improvements): A bond as stipulated in RMC 9-10-5, Street Excavation Bond, is
also required.
Less than 35 feet in length 1 $30.00
135 to 100 feet in length J $60.00 1
Greater than 100 feet in length 1 $90.00 1
Exception: No permit fee shall be charged for individual homeowners for work in
street rights -of -way for street tree or parking strip irrigation systems.
D. FRANCHISE PERMITS:
Utilities providing service within the City of Renton (Cable TV, cable modem, natural
gas, telecommunications, and electrical) shall do so under approved agreement with the City.
Construction by one of these utilities within rights of way, easements, and on public property is
subject to a permit. Permit fees are subject to the terms within each individual franchise
agreement. If a franchise agreement does not specify the timing of fees, the fee shall be due and
payable at or prior to the time of construction permit issuance. If a franchise agreement does not
specify the fee amount, the generic fee, as identified in the following table shall be collected. A
bond as stipulated in RMC 9-10-5, Street Excavation Bond, is also required.
ORDINANCE NO.
E. RELEASE OF EASEMENT FEES:
The imposition, collection, payment and other specifics concerning this charge are
detailed in chapter 9-1 RMC, Easements.
Filing fee
$250.00 payable at time of application
Processing fee
(Paid once Council approves the release)
$250.00 payable upon Council approval of the release
of easement
F. RIGHT-OF-WAY USE PERMIT FEES — REVOCABLE PERMITS FOR THE USE OF
EXCESS PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY:
These fees are payable at the time of application. The imposition, collection, payment and
other specifics concerning this charge are detailed in chapter 9-2 RMC, Excess Right -of -Way
Use.
A .
Single family and two-family uses
$10.00 annually, plus leasehold excise tax', if
applicable
All uses without public benefit
0.5% per month of property value of land to be
utilized, plus leasehold excise tax2, if applicable.
Payable yearly in advance.
Uses with public benefit
0.5% per year of assessed value of land adjoining the
property, plus leasehold excise tax2, if applicable. In
no case less than ten dollars ($10.00). Payable yearly
in advance.
t Right-of-way value shall be based on the assessed value of the land adjoining the property as established by the King County
Assessor.
2 There is hereby imposed a leasehold excise tax against fees so determined which are two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00) per
annum or more. Such tax shall be imposed at the rate as established by the State of Washington, Department of Revenue.
Insurance Required: Public liability and property damage insurance is also required
pursuant to RMC 9-2-5.13, Minimum Permit Requirements for Excess Right -of -Way Use.
3
ORDINANCE NO.
Exception for Public Agencies: A no fee permit may be issued only when the applicant is a
public agency and when the proposed use of the right-of-way provides a direct service to the
public (e.g., METRO applications for right-of-way for bus shelters).
G. STREET AND ALLEY VACATION FEES:
The imposition, collection, payment and other specifics concerning this charge are
detailed in chapter 9-14 RMC, Vacations.
Filing fee
$250.00 payable ofapplication
• •completionpayable
1 • • approval ofvacation
H. TEMPORARY UTILITY CONNECTION FEES:
Annual fee equal to ten percent
Annual fee equal to ten percent
Temporary connections to a City utility
system may be granted for a one-time,
(10%) of the current system
(10%) of the current system
temporary, short-term use of a portion
development charge applicable
development charge applicable to
of the property for a period not to
to that portion of the property,
that portion of the property, but
exceed three (3) consecutive years
but not less than three hundred
not less than seven hundred fifty
fifty dollars ($350.00) per year'
dollars ($750.00) per year'
Said fee shall be paid annually (nonprorated), and shall be nonrefundable, nontransferable (from one portion of the property to
another) and shall not constitute a credit to the system development charge due at the time of permanent use of the utility system.
The application for temporary connection shall consist of a detailed plan and a boundary line of the proposed development
service area for use in the fee determination.
I. CHARGES FOR EQUITABLE SHARE OF PUBLIC WORKS FACILITIES:
Owners of properties to which improvements are being proposed that have not been
assessed or charged an equitable share of the cost of public works facilities, such as water
systems, sanitary sewer systems, storm water drainage systems, and street improvements
including signalization and lighting, shall be subject to one or more of the charges listed in the
following subsections. Any fees triggered by improvements or development, as detailed in this
section, are due and payable at the first of the following instances:
• Prior to the issuance of a Public Works Construction Permit, or
7
ORDINANCE NO.
• Prior to the recording of a single family residential plat or single family residential short plat,
or
• Prior to the issuance of a building permit.
All of the following charges shall be paid into the Waterworks Utility Construction Fund
except that any fees collected under a private Latecomer's Agreement shall be passed on to the
holder of the agreement with the appropriate fees paid to the general fund. For the purposes of
this section the terms property(ies) or parcel(s) shall mean a lot of record as defined in Chapter
11 of this Title.
1. Private Held Latecomer's Fees and Special Assessment District (formerly known
as City held Latecomer's) Fees:
a. Applicability of Private Held Latecomer's Fee: The City has the
discretionary power, as detailed in chapter 9-5 RMC, to grant latecomer's agreements to
developers and owners for the reimbursement of a pro rata portion of public works facilities
(water systems, sanitary sewer systems, storm water drainage systems, and street improvements
including signalization and lighting) they install and turn over to the City.
b. Applicability of Special Assessment District Fee: The special assessment
charge is a fee that enables the City to recover a pro rata portion of the original costs of public
works improvements (water systems, sanitary sewer systems, storm water drainage systems, and
street improvements including signalization and lighting) from the owners of property who
would benefit from future connections to, or future users of, improvements to the City's
infrastructure that were not installed by LIDs or by a private developer under a latecomer
agreement. The imposition, collection, payment and other specifics concerning these charges
ORDINANCE NO.
are detailed in chapter 9-16 RMC, Special Assessment Districts. Interest may be charged
pursuant to RMC 9-16-6, Payments to City.
Exemptions for Latecomer's or Special Assessment District Fees:
i. Segregation of Fees: The City may grant segregation of private
developer latecomer's fees or special assessment district fees on large parcels of land per RMC
4-1-180.I.3 below.
ii. Relief Due to Two (2) Similar Facilities: The
Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator will consider relieving a parcel of a latecomer's
or special assessment district fee/assessment if the property has a benefit from either (but not
both) of two (2) similar facilities. The Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator will make
the decision based on engineering and policy decisions as to which facility(s) benefit and/or are
utilized by the parcel. The assessment due would be that associated with the utilized facility. If
there are no sound engineering or policy reasons that indicate one facility over the other, the City
shall give the applicant the choice of facilities to utilize.
iii. Relief Due to Future Subdivision: At the time the latecomer's
agreement or special assessment district is formed, and as a condition of the latecomer's
agreement or special assessment district, the City may require that the assessment against a
parcel be divided such that a single family residential connection will be assessed based upon the
size of a typical single family residential lot in that area. The remainder of the cost attributed to
said site will be due at such time as the parcel develops further either by subdivision or increased
density. In the case of a special assessment district, interest will continue to accrue on the
remaining portion of the assessment.
6
ORDINANCE NO.
iv. Reallocation of Assessment Due to Subdivision of Property: The
Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator will consider reallocation of the latecomer's
assessment or the special assessment if a property is subdivided for any purpose other than single
family use. Reallocation may be granted based upon front footage, area, or other equitable
means. Consideration may be given to adjusting the assessment between the new parcels, based
upon value of benefit from the improvements, such that two similar parcels may pay different
amounts because one receives more benefit.
2. System Development Charges (SDC) — Water, Wastewater, and Surface Water:
The City may hold and charge certain other fees similar to special assessment district
charges, which are commonly referred to as "system development charges."
a. Applicability of System Development Charge: The system development
charge is hereby imposed against properties and, by inference, the owners of said properties
which have not been assessed or charged or borne an equitable share of the cost of the City's
utility systems. Said property owner(s) shall pay, prior to connection to or benefit from a City
utility or utility facility, the system development charge associated with that utility as detailed in
the fees table in subsection 180-H.2.c of this section. A parcel may benefit from a City utility
system during the development or redevelopment of the property with or without a connection to
an established facility. Therefore, the system development charge for a utility may be triggered
without a physical connection to an existing facility.
i. Development of a utility System shall mean:
• Development of the Sanitary Sewer System, including but not
limited to lift stations, force mains, interceptors and other Sewer collection mains.
10
ORDINANCE NO.
Development of the Surface Water System, including but not
limited to retention / detention or water quality facilities, flood hazard reduction improvements,
lift stations, force mains, interceptors, and other surface water collection and conveyance
systems.
Development of the Water System, including but not limited to
wells, pump stations, reservoirs and transmission mains.
ii. The phrase "properties, which have not been assessed or charged
or borne an equitable share of the cost of the utility," as used in this Section, shall mean any of
the following:
First Time Service Connection or Benefit: Any property which has
not paid a system development charge for the property based upon the total square footage of the
property and which is connecting to or benefiting from a Renton utility system for the first time
(including but not limited to new construction, conversion from private well, or conversion from
septic system).
Further Subdivision: Any property which has not paid a system
development charge for the property based upon the total square footage of the property and is
served or benefited by the utility and is subdividing further for single family usage shall receive a
credit for the existing single family residence(s).
For example, a five (5) acre parcel with an existing single family house is being
subdivided for single family lots. If the existing house is connected to the City sewer and water
systems, the development would get credit for one single family system development charge for
sanitary sewer, storm water, and water. If the existing house was not connected to the City sewer
11
ORDINANCE NO.
system, the development would get credit for one single family system development charge for
storm water and water.
A property subdividing further for single family usage that receives a credit for existing
single family residence(s) shall not qualify for prorating of the system development charge under
subsection 180.I.2.c.
0 Existing Developments - Water and/or Sanitary Sewer:
Property that was developed before the effective date of the first development charge ordinances
for water and sanitary sewer in 1974 is exempted from the connection charge(s) for water and
sanitary sewer. Any rebuilding, change in use or additions to exempted property that does not
require additional water usage such that a fire hydrant, additional meter, or larger meter is
necessary will not trigger a new System Development Charge. However, except as provided
herein, when property is redeveloped or the use changed or intensified such that larger or
additional water meter(s) or the addition of a fire hydrant is necessary, application(s) for these
items will trigger the system development charge(s). An application for the installation of a
meter(s) solely for the purpose of either irrigation or fire protection or the installation of a fire
hydrant will trigger a system development charge for water. An application for an additional or
a larger water meter(s) for any purpose other than solely for irrigation or fire protection will
trigger a system development charge for both water and sewer.
Exceptions:
The addition of an irrigation meter only for an existing single-family residential dwelling
will not trigger a system development charge for water or sewer.
If an existing single family residence is being remodeled or rebuilt and remains a single
family residence on the same lot (not involved in a new plat, short plat, or lot line adjustment),
12
ORDINANCE NO.
the addition of a larger or additional meter will not trigger the system development charges for
water or sewer.
The addition of a second meter to an existing duplex in order to divide consumption for
billing purposes will not trigger a system development charge.
Existing Developments — Surface Water: Property that was
developed before the effective date of the first development charge ordinances for surface
(storm) water in 1992 is exempted from the surface water System Development Charge. The
addition of any new impervious surface to exempted properties will require payment of the
System Development Charge for surface water for the additional new impervious area only. If an
exempted property is making a connection for the first time to a surface water system, it will
require payment of the System Development Charge for surface water only for the impervious
area tributary to the point of connection. Any rebuilding, change in use or additions to exempted
property that does not create additional impervious surface area or does not cause a first time
connection to be made will not require payment of the System Development Charge for surface
water.
Exceptions:
Improvements to existing single family residential units such as additions that are less
than 500 square feet, decks, small sheds and other minor improvements are exempt from the
system development charge for surface water unless a new connection to the Renton surface
water utility collection system is proposed or required as part of the permit application.
13
ORDINANCE NO.
b. System Development Charge Table:
\
Single family
$1,105.00 per dwelling
$760.00 per dwelling
$525.00 per dwelling
residence
unit
unit
unit
Mobile/Manufactured
$885.00 per dwelling
$610.00 per dwelling
$525.00 per dwelling
Homes located in a
unit
unit
unit
mobile home or
manufactured home
park
Multi -family
$665.00 per dwelling
$455.00 per dwelling
$0.183 per square foot
unit, (auxiliary
unit, (auxiliary
of new impervious
(in all zones except
buildings like club
buildings like club
surfacing, but not less
CD and COR zones)
houses are considered
houses are considered
than $525.00
inclusive to the
inclusive to the
development and are
development and are
not counted as a
not counted as a
dwelling unit and are
dwelling unit and are
thus not included in the
thus not included in the
calculation of the fee)
calculation of the fee)
Mixed Use
Mixed use buildings
Mixed use buildings
$0.183 per square foot
with over 50% floor
with over 50% floor
of new impervious
(in all zones except
space used for
space used for
surface, but not less
CD and COR zones)
residential shall be
residential shall be
than $525.00
assessed at the rate of
assessed at the rate of
$665.00 per dwelling
$455.00 per dwelling
unit
unit
CD and COR zones
$0.154 per gross
$0.106 per gross
$0.183 per square foot
square foot of property,
square foot of property,
of new impervious, but
but not less than
but not less than
not less than $525.00
$1,105.00
$760.00
All other uses
$0.154 per gross
$0.106 per gross
$0.183 per square foot
square foot of property,
square foot of property,
of new impervious
but not less than
but not less than
surface, but not less
$1,105.00
$760.00
than $525.00
C. Prorating the System Development Charge for Redevelopment of
Property: An option exists for prorating the system development charge(s) for property which
14
ORDINANCE NO.
has not previously paid a charge in full. Any parcel that currently has water or sanitary sewer
service_ is eligible for a prorated system development charge for the associated utility.
Prorating based upon meter sizes: The prorated system
development charge will be based upon the capacity of the new meters as compared to the
capacity of the existing meters.
Meters installed solely for fire protection, either existing or proposed are not included in
the calculation for water or sanitary sewer. If there is an additional or larger meter solely for fire
flow or additional hydrants required for the proposed development, please refer also to sub-
section d.ii, below. Meters installed solely for irrigation (either existing or proposed) are not
included in the calculation for sanitary sewer.
This prorated redevelopment charge is calculated using the following formula:
[Proposed meter(s) capacity in gallons per minute (GPM) — Existing meter(s) capacity in
GPM] / [Proposed meter(s) capacity in GPM] x [SDC Fee] = Amount owed.
The City will determine the safe maximum operating capacities of all meter sizes using
American Water Works Association tables (see below). The fee paid shall be posted in the City's
database and applied to the total system development charge applicable for the parcel.
Reduction in meter capacity shall not result in a payment from the City to the applicant.
15
ORDINANCE NO.
WATER METER EQUIVALENCIES for purposes of calculating redevelopment
credit:
F
5/8
20
5/8 x 3/4
20
3/4
30
1
50
1-1/2
100
2
160
3
300
4
500
6
1000
8
1600
10
2300
12
3375
20
8250
ii. Prorating the System Development Charge for Fire Protection
Improvements associated with redevelopment of property:
Installation of a water meter solely for a fire protection system, such as a new hydrant or
fire sprinkler system shall be charged a fee equal to thirty percent (30%) of the system
development charge applicable to the portion of the parcel containing the improvements for
which the fire protection system is constructed to serve. Thirty percent (30%) is the amount the
water utility has expended throughout its system for fire flow protection. This fee shall be posted
to the City's database and applied as a partial payment to the total system development charge
applicable for the parcel.
For the purposes of this section, `portion of the parcel containing the improvements for
which the fire protection system is constructed to serve' shall be described as:
The smaller area of either the total square footage of the property or the
square footage of the property designated by a line drawn twenty (20) feet around
the footprint of the building being served by the meter installed for fire protection.
16
ORDINANCE NO.
The smaller area of either the total square footage of the property or the
square footage of the property designated by a line drawn twenty (20) feet around
.the footprint of the building(s) which by their construction, reconstruction or
improvement triggered the need for the new fire hydrant(s).
`Footprint' shall include the primary building plus ancillary structures such as garages,
carports, sheds, etc. that are considered by the Fire Department when calculating fire flow
requirements. In the case of multiple improvements, overlapping areas shall only be counted
once.
If the `portion of the parcel containing the improvements for which the fire protection
system is constructed to serve' is eighty percent (80%) of the parcel or more, then the thirty
percent (30%) shall be calculated on the total square footage of the property.
If a project both increases water meter capacity and installs a fire protection system, the
total of both prorated system development fees (subsections i and ii) would be charged. Payment
of said fees would be posted in the City's database and applied to the total system development
charge applicable for the parcel. In no case shall the total of the prorated system development
charge(s) be more than the total system development charge applicable for the parcel.
Installation of a water meter solely for a fire protection system shall not trigger a sewer
system development fee.
iii. Prorating the System Development Charge for installation of an
Irrigation Meter only:
When a water meter is installed solely for the purpose of providing irrigation water for
private landscaping (exempt meter), there will be charged a fee equal to ten percent (10%) of the
water system development charge applicable to the property. Said fee shall be nonrefundable,
nontransferable (from one portion of the property to another. Payment of said fee would be
posted in the City's database and applied to the total system development charge applicable for
17
ORDINANCE NO.
the parcel. At the applicant's option, the full water system development charge may be paid
instead_ of the ten percent (10%) payment described herein.
iv. Examples:
Example 1: A redevelopment project that involves a change from a single family home
on a ten thousand (10,000) square foot lot with a five -eighths inch by three-quarter inch meter
(5/8" x 3/4", a standard single family meter) that has a safe operating capacity of twenty (20)
gallons per minute (GPM), to a commercial usage with a one and one-half inch (1-1/2") meter
with a safe operating capacity of one hundred (100) GPM can apply to pay for the following
prorated charges:
(100 GPM — 20 GPM) / (100 GPM) = 0.8
For water: 0.8 x (10,000 sq. ft. x $0.154/sq. ft.) _ $1,231.00
For sewer: 0.8 X (10,000 sq. ft. x $0.106/sq. ft.) _ $848.00
Without the redevelopment credit, this project would have paid $0.106/sq. ft. x 10,000 sq.
ft. _ $1,060.00 for Sewer and paid $0.154/sq. ft. x 10,000 sq. ft. _ $1,540.00 for water.
Example 2: A property owner is planning to redevelop a half acre parcel that includes
a single family home with a five -eighths inch by three-quarter inch meter (5/8" x 3/4", a
standard single family meter) that has a safe operating capacity of twenty (20) GPM. The new
development will be an eight (8) unit multi -family dwelling with a two inch (2") meter with a
safe operating capacity of one hundred sixty (160) GPM, a three-quarter inch (3/4") irrigation
meter with a safe operating capacity of thirty (30) GPM, and a four inch (4") meter for fire
sprinklers. The property owner can apply to pay the following prorated charges:
89.5%
For water: based on meters (160 GPM + 30 GPM — 20 GPM) / (160 GPM + 30 GPM) _
IN
ORDINANCE NO.
based on fire service
Total
= 30%
= 119.5%
Therefore, 100% of the water system development charge would be due.
(8 units x $665.00 / unit = $5,320.00
For sewer: based on meters — irrigation meter excluded (160 GPM — 20 GPM) / (160
GPM) = 87.5%
Therefore, 87.5% of the sewer system development charge would be due.
87.5% x (8 units x $445.00 / unit = $3,115.00
Without the redevelopment credit, this project would have paid $445.00 / unit x 8 units =
$3,560.00.
d. Exemptions to System Development Charge:
i. Installation of an Irrigation Meter solely for the purpose of
providing irrigation water to City Right-of-way: Installation of a water meter solely for the
purpose of providing irrigation water to City right-of-way is exempted from the System
Development Charge.
ii. Exemption for City -Owned Property: No system development
charge will be collected on City -owned properties. The benefits to the utility from the use of
other City properties such as utility easements, lift stations and other benefits offset the amount
of the system development charge.
iii. Limited Exemptions for Municipal Corporations: A limited
exemption to the system development charge will be granted to municipal corporations for
portions of property subject to the system development charge to the extent that those specific
areas are available and maintained at all times for public use (e.g., ballfields adjacent to a school
19
ORDINANCE NO.
building) and shall be segregated from the fee determination as herein provided. In applying this
exemption to the extent possible, a single straight line shall be drawn across the property
separating the exempt property from the property to be charged. If a single straight line would
not achieve substantial equity, then additional lines may be drawn to include substantial open
space areas in the exemption. For purposes of this exemption, substantial open space areas shall
be at least one hundred thousand (100,000) square feet in area. Lines shall not be drawn closer
than fifteen feet (15') to any structure.
Nonexempt Areas: Parking lots, driveways, walkways, similar
areas and required landscape areas shall not be part of the exempt area.
Administrative Fees: The applicant shall pay the City's
administrative costs for the preparation, processing and recording the segregated fee. At the time
of application for system development charge segregation the applicant shall pay the
administrative fee of seven hundred fifty dollars ($750.00).
Restrictive Covenants: The exemption must be memorialized by
means of a restrictive covenant running with the land. Should the property exempted under this
Section later develop, then that property shall pay the system development charge in place at the
time of development.
Interpretation of Partial Payment: The Administrator of the
Planning/Building/Public Works Department shall make the final decision on the interpretation
of this limited exemption and the achievement of substantial equity.
iv. Exemption for Undeveloped Critical Area(s) and Undeveloped
Major Easement(s): When calculating the area to be charged the system development charge,
undeveloped critical areas (per RMC 4-11-030) and undeveloped major easements within the
20
ORDINANCE NO.
property shall not be included in the square footage for the calculation of the charge. It is the
responsibility of the property owner or applicant to submit a study determining and classifying
the critical area. The property owner or applicant shall submit a legal description of any
easement(s) or critical area(s) so that these portions of the property can be exempted from the
development charge(s).
The intent of this exemption is to not charge property that is undevelopable. If the
property is used or can be used to satisfy any condition of the development such as parking or
landscaping, it shall be considered developed and does not meet the qualifications of this
exemption.
V. Exemption Credit for Regional Improvements: If an applicant's
project proposes to solve a regional drainage problem, over and above the requirements to
mitigate their project's impacts, the value of the additional improvement shall be credited toward
the surface water system development charges due. The applicant must provide the
Administrator of the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works with the costs of the
drainage improvements and a suggested method of calculating the costs due to the extra work
done to solve a regional drainage problem. The Administrator will make the final decision on the
amount of the credit. In no instance shall the credit duplicate a latecomer's agreement such that
the applicant will be paid twice, nor may the credit against the connection charge exceed the
connection charge (i.e., no payment to the applicant under this Section).
vi. Surface Water Exemption for Infiltration Facility: Developments
which infiltrate or contain on site one -hundred percent (100%) of the on -site storm water runoff
volume from a one hundred (100) year storm are exempt from the surface water system
development charge. For the application of this credit, the owner/developer must use the current
21
ORDINANCE NO.
design criteria to show that the infiltration facility will infiltrate all of the volume of runoff
produced from the site during the one hundred (100) year storm.
If a development that is granted an exemption under this section discharges water offsite
during a hundred year storm or less, the development shall be required to make corrections or
improvements to the onsite system such that it will infiltrate up to the hundred year storm. If, in
the future, the development can no longer infiltrate one -hundred percent (100%) of the on -site
storm water runoff from a one hundred (100) year storm, the systems development charge shall
be due and payable as a condition of the connection to or utilization of the City's storm water
system.
Nothing in this section shall relieve the property owner(s) from complying with the
City's current flow control and water quality treatment standards at the time the development
converts from one -hundred percent (100%) infiltration to use of the City storm system. When a
development is converted from one -hundred percent (100%) infiltration to use of the City storm
system, the storm water management standards used shall consider the existing conditions prior
to the property being developed under the one -hundred percent (100%) infiltration exemption
and the developed conditions at the time the conversion is made.
There may be certain areas within the City that partially or completely prohibit the use of
infiltration facilities. If a current or future code or standard prohibits or limits the use of
infiltration facilities to any level below the one hundred (100) year storm, the development will
not qualify for this exemption.
3. Segregation Criteria and Rules:
Except for parcels being developed for single family use, the ability exists for the
segregation of system development, special assessment district, and latecomer's charges in the
22
ORDINANCE NO.
partial development of a large parcel of property. This segregation shall be based on the
following criteria and rules:
a. Segregation by Plat or Short Plat: Charges shall be determined on the basis
of the specific platted properties being developed regardless of the parcel size. Unplatted or
large -platted parcels may be platted or short -platted prior to development, in which case the
system development charge will be applied to the specific platted lots being developed.
b. Segregation by Administrative Determination: For the partial development
of a large tract of property the owner may apply for a segregation of the system development,
special assessment district, and latecomer's charge(s) for the specific portion of the property to
be developed. The burden of establishing the segregation by legal description, number of units,
and map would be on the party owing the fee and not the City. The following criteria shall
determine the segregation of fees:
Provisions: This provision shall apply to all developments with the
exception of single family residential and mobile home developments. When a parcel is
segregated by administrative determination, prorating of the system development charge for
redevelopment shall not be allowed.
ii. Segregation of Fees: The segregation of fees shall be by formal,
written agreement, including a legal description approved by the City, which shall be recorded
as a restrictive covenant running with the land. The restrictive covenant shall list the percentage
of the system development charge fee that has been paid for the property. The applicant shall
also include a detailed plan, drafted to current adopted City standards, of the proposed
development, which shall include the proposed boundary line, as described in the legal
description, for the system development charge determination.
23
ORDINANCE NO.
iii. Segregated Areas: Minimum size of area segregated for
determination and payment of system development charge(s) shall be two (2) acres. The
segregated area shall include, but not be limited to, all contiguous existing developed land for
which the system development charge(s) have not been paid; all proposed buildings; driveways
and sidewalks; parking areas; grass and landscape areas; public access areas; storm drainage
facilities and detention ponds; and improvements required for mitigation of environmental
impacts under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). The boundary line for the segregation
of system development charge shall be established by survey and legal description and shall not
be closer than fifteen feet (15') to any structure.
iv. Remnant Parcel: Minimum size of the remnant parcel of
undeveloped property for which the system development charge is deferred shall be two (2)
acres. Should the property partially paid for under this Section later develop, then that property
shall pay the system development charge fee in place at the time of development. Should the
property partially paid for under this Section later be subdivided, then the partial payment credit
shall run with the subdivided lots. The burden of establishing that the partial payment has been
made would be on the party owing the fee and not on the City.
V. Determination of Charge: The system development charge shall be
determined on the basis of the percentage of a property that is developed (existing development
plus proposed development). When a proposed development takes a parcel over the threshold of
full development, as described in this Section, one -hundred percent (100%) of the systems
development charge(s) is owed and any balance is due and payable.
vi. Full Development: For the purpose of this Code, "full
development" is considered to be sixty percent (60%) property coverage for multi -family
24
ORDINANCE NO.
development and eighty percent (80%) property coverage for commercial, industrial, mixed use,
and all.other development. "Property coverage" is defined as the portion of the property
supporting buildings, driveways and sidewalks, parking areas, grass and landscape areas, public
access areas, storm drainage facilities and detention ponds, and improvements required for
mitigation of environmental impacts under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA).
vii. Developed Area: The "developed area" shall include, but not be
limited to, all contiguous existing developed land for which the system development charges
have not been paid: all existing and proposed buildings, driveways and sidewalks, parking areas,
grass and landscape areas, public access areas, storm drainage facilities and detention ponds, and
improvements required for mitigation of environmental impacts.
viii. Administrative Fees: The applicant shall pay the City's
administrative costs for the preparation, processing and recording of the partial payment of the
fee(s). At the time of application for system development charge partial payment the applicant
shall pay the administrative fee of seven hundred fifty dollars ($750.00) for each segregation. If
the same segregation is used for more than one utility's system development charge, than only
one administrative fee is collected.
ix. Interpretation: The Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public
Works Department shall make the final decision on interpretation of the partial payment of
system development charges.
SECTION II. Section 4-3-050.P of Chapter 3, Environmental Regulations and
Special Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code
of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
P. (Reserved)
25
ORDINANCE NO.
SECTION III.
30 days after publication.
This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD .1004 : 8/ 16/02: m a.
day of , 2002.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
day of , 2002.
Jesse Tanner, Mayor
al
JDA Group LLC
95 S Tobin St • Suite 201 • Renton * WA 98055 • Ph 425-891-1002 Fax 425-687 14050 alhadeffiackq hotmail com
December 17, 2002
Ms. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler
And The Renton City Council
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
Dear Ms Keolker-Wheeler•
CITY OF RENTON
DEC 19 2002
REC
CITY CLERK'SEOFFICE
CITY OF RENTON
DEC 3 1 2002
RECEIVED
Ut C 1 9 Z002
CEIV
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
It has come to my attention that the city of Renton has made a commitment to remodel the
Pavilion Building in downtown Renton. I would very much like to talk with the city about
securing a long term master lease. If the city Would like to place a long-term lease on this
property please contact me at 425-891-1002.
Thank you, for your attention to this matter I look forward to your response.
Sincerely;
/DA Group LLC
Jack D. Alhadeff
Managing Partner