Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil 08/04/2003AGENDA RENTON CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING August 4, 2003 Monday, 7:30 p.m. 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 3. PROCLAMATION: Farmers Market Week — August 9 to 16, 2003 4. SPECIAL PRESENTATION: Historical Society and Museum Annual Report PUBLIC MEETINGS: a. Carlo Annexation —10% Notice of Intent Petition to Annex for 37 acres bounded by 136th Ave. SE, 140th Ave. SE, NE 3rd St., and SE 135th St. b. Merritt Annexation —10% Notice of Intent Petition to Annex for 4.8 acres bounded by SE May Valley Rd., Lyons Ave. NE, SE 100th St., and NE 26th St. c. Mosier Annexation —10% Notice of Intent Petition to Annex for 31 acres bounded by 142nd and 144th Avenues SE, and SE 136th St. 6. PUBLIC HEARING: Highlands redevelopment area residential -oriented City Code amendments 7. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT 8. AUDIENCE COMMENT (Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is allowed five minutes. The comment period will be limited to one-half hour. The second audience comment period later on in the agenda is unlimited in duration.) When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer, please walk to the podium and state your name and address for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST NAME. 9. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further discussion if requested by a Councilmember. a. Approval of Council meeting minutes of July 21, 2003. Council concur. b. Mayor Tanner reappoints Vern Nichols, 194 Monterey Pl. NE, Renton, 98056, to the Human Rights & Affairs Commission for a two-year term expiring 9/19/2005. Council concur. c. City Clerk reports receipt of $151,920 compensation paid by petitioner, as set by Council on 6/23/2003, and recommended adoption of ordinances to finalize the St. Anthony's Parish street vacations for portions of Whitworth Ave. S. and a portion of the alley running north and south between Whitworth and Morris Avenues S. and S. 3rd and 4th Streets (VAC-00-003 & VAC-03- 001). Council concur. (See 12.a. & 12.b. for ordinances.) d. City Clerk reports bid opening on 7/29/2003 for CAG-03-115, East Kennydale Sanitary Sewer Infill & Water Main Replacement Phase II; five bids; engineer's estimate $1,285,696.13; and submits staff recommendation to award the contract to low bidder, RCI Construction Group, in the amount of $1,310,562.37. Council concur. e. City Clerk reports bid opening on 7/30/2003 for CAG-03-116, S. Grady Way & Rainier Ave. S. Pavement Rehabilitation; one bid; engineer's estimate $410,730; and submits staff recommendation to award the contract to the sole bidder, Gary Merlino Construction Company, Inc., in the amount of $446,862. Refer to Transportation Committee. (CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE) f. Community Services Department submits CAG-03-002, Liberty Park Skate Park Revisions; and requests approval of the project, authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of $5,918.72, commencement of 60-day lien period, and release of retained amount of $3,263.26 to T.F. Sahli Construction, contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. g. Community Services Department submits CAG-02-148, Highlands Park Irrigation; and requests approval of the project, authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of $6,116.16, commencement of 60-day lien period, and release of retained amount of $3,274.89 to Mr. Irrigation, contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. h. Community Services Department recommends the following be approved: a $1,067,909.85 change order to the contract with E. Kent Halvorson, Inc. for construction of Fire Station #12 (CAG-02-177) for cost increases due to replacing the original contractor who was operating under an invalid contract; payment by E. Kent Halvorson to subcontractors for work done through March, 2003 totaling $87,257.52; and an additional appropriation of $884,131 to cover increased costs and an appropriation adjustment. Refer to Committee of the Whole. i. Development Services Division recommends acceptance of right-of-way along S. Tillicum St. to fulfill a requirement of the Amrik Singh Short Plat (SHP-03-027). Council concur. j. Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department recommends adoption of a resolution ratifying the 2002 amendments to King County's Countywide Planning Policies. Refer to Planning & Development Committee. k. Finance and Information Services Department recommends approval of a resolution updating signature authorities for depositories and electronic fund transfers for the City, due to personnel changes. Council concur. (See 12.a. for resolution.) 1. Hearing Examiner recommends approval, with conditions, of the Brookefield Preliminary Plat; 47 single-family lots on 7.16 acres located at 1024 and 1050 Hoquiam Ave. NE (PP-03-003). Council concur. m. Hearing Examiner recommends approval, with conditions, of the Cedar Avenue Preliminary Plat; 50 single-family lots on 9.9 acres located at 3521 Cedar Ave. S. (PP-02-125). Council concur. n. Human Services Division recommended setting a public hearing on 9/08/2003 to consider the allocation of the 2004 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds as recommended by the Human Services Advisory Committee. Refer to Community Services Committee; set public hearing for 9/08/2003. o. Technical Services Division recommends approval of King County's request for utility easements across the Airport and Cedar River Trail Park properties for the amount of $262,830. Refer to Utilities Committee. p. Transportation Systems Division requests authorization to purchase electronic equipment and the system installation for the Traffic Management Center under the State Department of Information Systems contract in the amount of $220,150.06 plus tax, bonds and permits. Refer to Transportation Committee. q. Utility Systems Division submits CAG-02-082, CT Detention Pipeline for Wells R1, R2 & R3 and Park Improvements; and requests approval of the project, authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of $100, commencement of 60-day lien period, and release of retainage bond to R. L. Alia Company, contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. r. Utility Systems Division recommends approval to transfer funds in the amount of $100,000 from the Sewer Main Replacement/Rehabilitation account to the Kennydale Lakefront Sewer Improvement account to cover additional costs. Refer to Utilities Committee. 10. CORRESPONDENCE E-mail from Norman G. Wilcox, 916 N. 34th St., Renton, 98056, listing community organizations that receive monies earned from the sale of fireworks by the Kennydale Lions Club. Refer to Public Safety Committee. 11. OLD BUSINESS Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics marked with an asterisk (*) may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be held by the chairman if further review is necessary. a. Community Services Committee: Chambers Appointment to Municipal Arts Commission b. Finance Committee: Vouchers (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE) c. Transportation Committee: King County Agreement Regarding Coal Creek Parkway Improvements*; Berger/Abam Engineers Contract for Duvall Ave. NE Widening Project; Berger/Abam Engineers Contract for Duvall Ave. NE Intersection Improvements 12. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Resolutions: a. Updating signature authorities for banking transactions (see 91.) b. Agreement with King County regarding Coal Creek Parkway Improvements (see 11.c.) Ordinances for first reading: a. Vacation of portions of Whitworth Ave. S.; VAC-00-003 (see 9.c.) b. Vacation of portion of alley running north & south between Whitworth & Morris Avenues. S.; VAC-03-001 (see 9.c.) c. Highlands redevelopment area residential -oriented amendments (see 6.) 13. NEW BUSINESS (Includes Council Committee agenda topics; call 425-430-6512 for recorded information.) 14. AUDIENCE COMMENT 15. ADJOURNMENT CONIlVI=E OF THE WHOLE AGENDA (Preceding Council Meeting) Council Conference Room 6:00 p.m. Emerging Issues; Boeing Environmental Impact Statement Information • Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk • CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 AND ARE RE-CABLECAST TUES. & THURS. AT 11:00 AM & 9:00 PM, WED. & FRI. AT 9:00 AM & 7:00 PM AND SAT. & SUN. AT 1:00 PM & 9:00 PM RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting August 4, 2003 Council Chambers Monday, 7:30 p.m. MINUTES Renton City Hall CALL TO ORDER Mayor Jesse Tanner led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER, Council President; DAN CLAWSON; TONI COUNCILMEMBERS NELSON; RANDY CORMAN; DON PERSSON. MOVED BY KEOLKER- WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS KING PARKER AND TERRI BRIERE. CARRIED. CITY STAFF IN JESSE TANNER, Mayor; JAY COVINGTON, Chief Administrative Officer; ATTENDANCE ZANETTA FONTES, Assistant City Attorney; BONNIE WALTON, City Clerk; GREGG ZIMMERMAN, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator; DENNIS CULP, Community Services Administrator; STEVE ANDERSON, Museum Supervisor; CLARK PETERSEN, Library Director; ALEX PIETSCH, Economic Development Administrator; DON ERICKSON, Senior Planner; REBECCA LIND, Planner Manager; GIL CERISE, Senior Planner; DEREK TODD, Assistant to the CAO; COMMANDER KENT CURRY, Police Department. PROCLAMATION A proclamation by Mayor Tanner was read declaring the week of August 9 to Farmers Market Week — August 16, 2003, to be "Farmers Market Week" in the City of Renton, and August 9 to 16, 2003 urging all citizens to recognize the many benefits of the Renton Farmers Market.* Councilwoman Toni Nelson accepted the proclamation and noted the presence of several Farmers Market volunteers in the audience. She thanked the volunteers for all of their hard work in making the Farmers Market a success. *MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE PROCLAMATION AS READ. CARRIED. SPECIAL PRESENTATION Renton Historical Society President Barbara Horton presented the 2002 annual Community Services: Museum report of the Renton Historical Society and Museum. Ms. Horton described the & Renton Historical Society bequest given to the Renton Historical Society by Charles Custer and how it is Annual Report being managed. The original bequest was valued at $1.3 million and now is valued closer to $2 million. Detailing the work involved with documenting, cataloging, and incorporating the Charles Custer estate artifacts into the Museum's collection, she noted that the bequest has dominated the work of the Board and the Museum Director for more than two years. Ms. Horton reviewed the near -term goals of the Renton Historical Society, which include addressing immediate storage issues, resuming display updates, and developing more efficient ways to access items to meet the rate of donations. She concluded by listing the long-term goals as follows: build a vision and a plan that satisfies the display and storage limitations on a permanent basis, build a vision within the community of a Museum as part of the cultural center, develop a solid financial plan to make the visions happen, and make historic preservation a valued part of the future of the City. PUBLIC MEETINGS This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in Annexation: Carlo, 136th Ave accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Tanner opened the public meeting SE & 140th Ave SE to consider the Carlo 10% Annexation Petition - an approximately 37-acre "L" August 4, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 264 shaped area located between 136th Ave. SE on the west, 140th Ave. SE on the east, NE 3rd St., if extended, on the north, and SE 135th St., if extended, on the south. Don Erickson, Senior Planner, explained that the site is within the East Renton Plateau Potential Annexation Area and currently consists of 20 parcels and 17 detached single-family dwellings. The site is relatively flat and not known to have any critically sensitive areas. Reviewing the public services, he noted that the site is served by Fire District #25 and the Renton School District, and is within the Renton water and sewer utility service area. The existing zoning under King County is R-4; and Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates the property as Residential Single Family for which R-8 (eight dwelling units per net acre) zoning is proposed. Regarding the fiscal impact of the proposed annexation, Mr. Erickson reported that the City will realize a surplus of $1,285 at full development, assuming an increase to 200 single-family homes and an assessed home value of $290,000. He concluded that the annexation proposal is generally consistent with Renton policies and Boundary Review Board objectives. He noted some potential flooding in the area, suggesting mitigation with future development; and except for parks, no impediments to the provision of City services to the site have been identified. Public comment was invited. Eileen Cluphf, 13632 SE 135th St., Renton, 98055, expressed concern about the large amount of new housing that has been constructed in the surrounding areas. As a result, she has noticed the presence of more wildlife in the area. Anthony J. Glazewski, 13225 138th Ave. SE, Renton, 98059, stated his opposition to the Carlo Annexation due to the high residential density proposed by the developers. Charlie Conner, 4728 194th Ave. SE, Issaquah, 98027, announced he was the proponent of the annexation and stated that there is a need for housing in the area. He indicated that R-8 zoning is an efficient use of the site, which is relatively unconstrained environmentally. Mr. Conner noted that SEPA (State Environmental Protection Act) review will be conducted on all development, and open space that lies outside the urban growth boundary will be preserved. He urged support of the annexation. Roy Vavak, 13418 138th Ave. SE, Renton, 98056, expressed his support for the annexation and indicated that he shares the concerns regarding wildlife. He pointed out that development is inevitable and wildlife is not safe in this area anymore. Walter Rau, 13243 138th Ave. SE, Renton, 98056, inquired as to why the proposed zoning for the area is R-8 and not R-4. He stated that the value of the neighborhood will be reduced due to overcrowding. Mr. Rau expressed concern regarding the impact of increased traffic along NE 4th St., and questioned, if the area is annexed, whether he will be required to hookup to the sewer. Lola Archer, 14004 SE 133rd St., Renton, 98056, stated that her yard abuts 140th Ave. SE, an undeveloped street, and worries that development may mean condemnation of her property to improve the street and the lack of a green barrier between her property and the new development. Expressing her August 4, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 265 concerns regarding the proposed annexation, Ms. Archer noted that her neighborhood flooded when the Orchards development was built. Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer, explained that Renton must comply with the State Growth Management Act that requires cities to provide for growth within boundaries, such as the urban growth area, at a higher density. Mayor Tanner added that the City received a petition to annex resulting in this public meeting, and if a majority of the registered voters living within the annexation area and the owners of a majority of the acreage within the annexation area do not want to be annexed, there will be no annexation. Rebecca Lind, Planner Manager, stated that the density issue is complicated, and staff will advise Council at the next step of the process as to where each of these properties are with respect to the urban growth line if Council authorizes circulation of the 50% petition and if that petition is successful. She indicated that the proponent requested R-8 zoning, and noted that within the urban growth area, the efficient use of land must be achieved in order to meet the growth targets of the area. Council President Keolker-Wheeler discussed some of the differences between King County policy and Renton policy regarding compliance with the Growth Management Act. Ms. Lind noted that staff is conducting a land use study of the East Renton Plateau Potential Annexation Area, which includes reviewing density issues, the difference between King County and Renton zoning, and sewer policies. Councilman Clawson pointed out that the City has no financial incentive to place a higher density on the property. In regards to the sewer system, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Gregg Zimmerman explained that there is no requirement in Renton for properties to hookup to the sewers. If sewers were extended in the area by a developer, there is no requirement for existing property owners to hookup to that sewer; however, property owners can choose to hookup to the system and pay the assessment upon connection. Regarding the surface water issues in the East Renton Plateau area, Mr. Zimmerman stated that Renton is working with King County to identify those issues. He emphasized that the City will make sure that its surface water design standards are adhered to by the developers. In regards to traffic concerns, Mr. Zimmerman indicated that the City is: studying the NE 3rd and 4th Street corridor; staying abreast of the I-405 expansion plans; and expanding Duvall Ave. NE. In regards to the wildlife issue, Councilman Corman pointed out that stream and creek setbacks are required not only to maintain clean water, but also to provide a transportation corridor for animals. Instead of pushing back the animals into undeveloped areas, the focus is on creating barrier -free corridors for wildlife. There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC MEETING. CARRIED. August 4, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 266 MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL: ACCEPT THE 10% NOTICE OF INTENT TO ANNEX, AUTHORIZE CIRCULATION OF THE 50% PETITION TO ANNEX, REQUIRE THE ADOPTION OF CITY ZONING ON THE PROPERTY CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AND REQUIRE THAT PROPERTY OWNERS ASSUME A PROPORTIONAL SHARE OF THE CITY'S BONDED INDEBTEDNESS. CARRIED. Annexation: Merritt, SE May This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in Valley Rd & Lyons Ave NE accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Tanner opened the public meeting to consider the Merritt 10% Notice of Intent to Annex Petition for approximately 4.8 acres located south of May Valley Rd. and west of Lyons Ave. NE. It is bordered by SE 100th St., if extended on the south, and NE 26th St., if extended on the north. Senior Planner Don Erickson reported that the annexation area contains one single-family dwelling and is within the East Renton Plateau Potential Annexation Area. Portions of the northern half of the site are within a high erosion hazard area. Public services are provided by Fire District #25, Water District #90, Renton sewer, and the Issaquah School District. Current King County zoning for the annexation area is R-l. The area is designated Residential Rural by Renton's Comprehensive Plan and is prezoned R-1 (one dwelling unit per net acre). Mr. Erickson reviewed the fiscal impacts of the proposed annexation, assuming an increase to four single-family homes at full development and a new home value of $290,000. The City will realize a deficit of $186 at full development. In conclusion, he stated that the annexation proposal complies with City policies and Boundary Review Board objectives, and will result in no significant cost or service issues for the City. Public comment was invited. Tamie Boydston, 2508 Lyons Ave. NE, Renton, 98059, stated that she resides in the neighboring Stonegate development. She expressed concern regarding the type of development that may occur on the proposed annexation site and how it will affect the property value of her home. Additionally, she hoped that if the street is dug up for development of the site, that it will be returned to its original condition. Mayor Tanner assured that Renton requires developers to restore streets to their original preexisting condition. Economic Development Administrator Alex Pietsch pointed out that the zoning for this proposed annexation is far different than the zoning proposed for the Carlo annexation. The site has been prezoned R-1, which means one dwelling unit per acre. Mark Freeman, 5500 NE 26th St., Renton, 98056, stated that his property directly abuts the subject annexation site. He noted that Stonegate is also zoned R-1; however, it contains a large amount of green space. Bryan Vadney, 5404 NE 24th Ct., Renton, 98059, indicated that although he received notification of this public meeting, he would also appreciate receiving information that briefly explained what to expect at the public meeting. He stated that he enjoys living in Renton and understands that others would like to be part of this City. Mr. Vadney commented that he does not understand the August 4, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 267 potential impacts of the annexation on the Stonegate neighborhood, especially in regards to the sharing of costs for public services. Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator, noted that substantial expenses will be incurred by the developer to extend the sewer and water line to the annexation site, similar to what occurred at Stonegate. Councilman Clawson noted that the City has a long-range plan for sewers in the area to ensure that there is capacity for future developments. Betsy Reamy, 2502 Lyons Ave. NE, Renton, 98059, stated that each of the four lots on the annexation site may be developed by a different builder, and she expressed concern regarding the installation of proper storm drainage facilities on each lot. Mayor Tanner stated that each builder must adhere to the City's development regulations. Debra Rogers, 5326 NE 22nd Ct., Renton, 98059, inquired as to how the $290,000 assessed home value amount used in the fiscal impact analysis was determined. Mayor Tanner stated that the amount is determined by a standard formula the City uses when performing a financial analysis, and represents the average amount of a house in the City of Renton. There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC MEETING. CARRIED. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL: ACCEPT THE 10% NOTICE OF INTENT TO ANNEX, AUTHORIZE CIRCULATION OF THE 50% PETITION TO ANNEX, AND REQUIRE THAT PROPERTY OWNERS ASSUME A PROPORTIONAL SHARE OF THE CITY'S BONDED INDEBTEDNESS. CARRIED. Annexation: Mosier, 142nd & This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in 144th Aves SE accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Tanner opened the public meeting to consider the Mosier 10% Notice to Intent Annex Petition - approximately 31 acres located between 142nd and 144th Avenues SE (Hoquiam and Jericho Avenues NE), the existing City limits on the north, and SE 136th St. on the south. Don Erickson, Senior Planner, stated that the site is within the East Renton Plateau Potential Annexation Area and currently consists of 25 parcels and 21 single-family dwellings. The topography is essentially flat with a slight slope, and a branch of Maplewood Creek traverses the southern half of the site. Reviewing the public services, he noted that the site is served by Fire District #25, Water District #90, and the Renton School District; and is within the Renton sewer utility service area. Mr. Erickson explained that the existing King County zoning is R-4. The area is designated Residential Single Family and Residential Rural under Renton's Comprehensive Plan for which R-5 (five dwelling units per net acre) zoning is proposed because the majority of the site is designated Residential Rural. Regarding the fiscal impact of the proposed annexation, he reported that the City will realize a $1,736 surplus at full development, assuming an increase to 133 single-family homes and an assessed home value of $290,000. He concluded that the proposed annexation is consistent with City policies and Boundary Review Board objectives, and serves the best interests and general welfare of the City. August 4, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 268 Mayor Tanner pointed out that Renton's R-5 zoning is equivalent to King County's R-4 zoning. Paul Trammel, 13205 144th Ave. SE, Renton, 98059, stated that he lives in the proposed annexation area, and confirmed that his address would change if the area is annexed. He expressed his concerns regarding how the annexation will affect sewer service, traffic, and police services. Council President Keolker-Wheeler stressed that consistent addressing within Renton is important for emergency services. Ted Glandon, 13405 142nd Ave. SE, Renton, 98059, supports R-5 zoning for the annexation area, indicating that it is compatible with the surrounding area. He noted that wildlife and traffic issues are of concern to him. Alain Smith, 13415 144th Ave. SE, Renton, 98059, stated his support for the proposed annexation, noting that he owns approximately a third of the property in the area. Brian Leitch, 14217 SE 136th St., Renton, 98059, reported that he lives directly south of the annexation area and expressed his support for the annexation. He noted that he intends to pursue annexing his property to the City as well. Correspondence was read from Steven A. Beck, 19129 SE 145th St., Renton, 98059; Lauren & Lila Mosier, 13025 144th Ave. SE, Renton, 98059; and Craig Landon, 10520 169th Ave. SE, Renton, 98059; all expressing support for the proposed Mosier Annexation. There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC MEETING. CARRIED. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL: ACCEPT THE 10% NOTICE OF INTENT TO ANNEX, AUTHORIZE CIRCULATION OF THE 50% PETITION TO ANNEX, REQUIRE THE ADOPTION OF CITY ZONING ON THE PROPERTY CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AND REQUIRE THAT PROPERTY OWNERS ASSUME A PROPORTIONAL SHARE OF THE CITY'S BONDED INDEBTEDNESS. CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in Planning: Highlands Area accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Tanner opened the public hearing Redevelopment, Harrington to consider the Highlands redevelopment area residential -oriented City Code Square amendments. Gil Cerise, Senior Planner, explained that the proposed City Code amendments modify the existing Suburban Center Residential Bonus District overlay (creates a new "District C") in the Highlands redevelopment area to permit increased density and urban demographic parking requirements in exchange for additional design and open space requirements. Mr. Cerise reviewed the City Code amendments to the Center Suburban Zone development standards as follows: Modifies maximum density to 80 dwelling units per net acre for District C; Requires a minimum on -site landscape width along street frontage when a commercial lot is adjacent to property zoned residential; August 4, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 269 • Creates a District C consisting mostly of the Center Village area near NE Sunset Blvd; • Requires an on -site open space; • Includes building design standards; • Adds parking location requirements; • Amends parking standards; and • Corrects unit types. Mr. Cerise concluded by recommending that Council adopt the City Code amendments allowing additional density and urban parking standards in exchange for higher design and open space thresholds, and correcting the use types allowed. Public comment was invited. Bob Gevers, 900 Kirkland Ave. NE, Renton, 98056, stated that he resides in the affected area. He expressed his disappointment that this proposal is different from earlier plans discussed for the subject area. Noting the opening of a new store, Mr. Gevers stressed that he is not happy with the new development in the Highlands area. He expressed concern about the height restrictions of future dwellings built under the proposed density standards. Additionally, he expressed concern that the new development will result in additional traffic and noise, and suggested that redevelopment of the Highlands area be put on hold until the area's infrastructure is improved enough to support it. Economic Development Administrator Alex Pietsch stated that no change is proposed for the current 50-foot height limit. Discussion ensued regarding the various plans for redevelopment of the Highlands area, such as the Highlands Shopping Center; the height issues; and public involvement in the process. There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY CLAWSON.,- SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL DELAY ACTION ON THE HIGHLANDS REDEVELOPMENT AREA RESIDENTIAL -ORIENTED CITY CODE AMENDMENTS FOR ONE WEEK AND AT THAT TIME PRESENT THE RELATED ORDINANCE FOR FIRST AND SECOND READING. CARRIED. ADMINISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2003 and beyond. Items noted included: • The government of the State of Jalisco, Mexico, along with the Jalisco community in the Puget Sound area and the Renton-Cuautla Sister City Committee, will present Jalisco Week in Washington, August 15 through 17, in Renton. The three-day fair will take place at Renton High School. • The public is invited to a special ceremony to re -dedicate the Will Rogers - Wiley Post Seaplane Base memorial on August 7 at the Renton Airport. August 4, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 270 On August 5, twelve different Renton neighborhoods will participate in National Night Out, a program designed to heighten crime and drug prevention awareness. RECESS MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL RECESS FOR FIVE MINUTES. CARRIED. Time: 10:03 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 10:10 p.m.; roll was called; all Councilmembers present except Parker and Briere, previously excused. AUDIENCE COMMENT Jane Hower, 1425 S. Puget Dr. #118, Renton, 98055, requested that Council Citizen Comment: Hower - reconsider and reverse its decision of January 6, 2003, approving the Matricula Consular as Legal recognition of the Matricula Consular as legal identification for Mexican Identification for Mexican citizens living in the United States (Resolution #3612). She presented packets Citizens Living in US to the Council containing documentation obtained through her research on the Internet regarding the identification card. Ms. Hower claimed that these cards essentially give illegal immigrants the ability to live in the United Stated as legal aliens, undermining efforts to control immigration, and threatening the country's security. She questioned the amount of research conducted prior to the Council's decision, and urged Council to review the information she submitted. Councilman Clawson, Chair of the Public Safety Committee, reported that this issue was brought before Council by the Renton Police Chief. Upon investigation of the issue, he discovered that throughout the United States, most police chiefs advocate the use of these cards as a law enforcement tool giving them the means to identify people who have no other identification. He acknowledged that the cards can be forged, as also a drivers license or social security card can be forged. Mr. Clawson noted that some of the information submitted by Ms. Hower was composed by organizations that are anti - immigrant. He stated that unless the Federal government decides that the use of the card is dangerous or inappropriate, he feels that the Council made the right decision. Citizen Comment: McNabb - Greg McNabb, Business Manager for St. Anthony's Parish, 1507 32nd Ave., Whitworth Ave S & Alley Seattle, 98122, requested that the ordinances approving the Whitworth Ave. S. Vacations, St Anthony's and alley street vacations listed on the agenda for first reading be advanced for Parish, VAC-00-003 & VAC- second and final reading this evening. 03-001 Citizen Comment: Guthrie - Reid Guthrie, 809 High Ave. S., Renton, 98055, stated that he agrees with some Matricula Consular as Legal of the concerns addressed by Ms. Hower regarding the Matricula Consular Identification for Mexican identification cards. He emphasized that there are people that want to cause Citizens Living in US harm to this country, and this type of identification is another tool for them to use. Citizen Comment: Sens - Gene Sens, 7259 S. Sunnycrest Rd., Seattle, 98178, commented on the success Farmers Market of the Renton Farmers Market, and thanked the City for its support. He stated that the market is the forerunner of things to come and is an example of a way to work that continues the efforts to revitalize and promote the economic health of the downtown area. He stressed that much more is possible and proposals are being developed to ensure that successes like this will continue rather than fade. Mr. Sens emphasized that even if Councilmember Nelson decides not to return as head of the Farmer Market next year, the market will continue and remain an instrumental part of the downtown area. August 4, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 271 CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. At the request of Councilman Persson, item 9.e. was removed for separate consideration. Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of July 21, 2003. Council concur. July 21, 2003 Appointment: Human Rights Mayor Tanner reappointed Vern Nichols, 194 Monterey Pl. NE, Renton, 98056, & Affairs Commission to the Human Rights and Affairs Commission for a two-year term expiring 9/19/2005. Council concur. Vacation: Whitworth Ave S & City Clerk reported receipt of $151,920 compensation paid by petitioner, as set Alley, St. Anthony's Parish, by Council on 6/23/2003, and recommended adoption of ordinances to finalize VAC-00-003 & VAC-03-001 the St. Anthony's Parish street vacations for portions of Whitworth Ave. S. and a portion of the alley running north and south between Whitworth and Morris Avenues S. and S. 3rd and 4th Streets (VAC-00-003 & VAC-03-001). Council concur. (See page 275 for ordinances.) CAG: 03-115, East Kennydale City Clerk reported bid opening on 7/29/2003 for CAG-03-115, East Kennydale Sanitary Sewer Infill & Water Sanitary Sewer Infill & Water Main Replacement Phase U; five bids; engineer's Main Replacement Phase II, estimate $1,285,696.13; and submitted staff recommendation to award the RCI Construction Group contract to low bidder, RCI Construction Group, in the amount of $1,310,562.37. Council concur. CAG: 03-002, Skate Park Community Services Department submitted CAG-03-002, Liberty Park Skate Revisions, TF Sahli Const Park Revisions; and requested approval of the project, authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of $5,918.72, commencement of 60-day lien period, and release of retained amount of $3,263.26 to T.F. Sahli Construction, contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. CAG: 02-148, Highlands Park Community Services Department submitted CAG-02-148, Highlands Park Irrigation, Mr Irrigation Irrigation; and requested approval of the project, authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of $6,116.16, commencement of 60-day lien period, and release of retained amount of $3,274.89 to Mr. Irrigation, contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. CAG: 02-177, Fire Station #12 Community Services Department recommended the following be approved: a Construction, Cost Increase $1,067,907.85 change order to the contract with E. Kent Halvorson, Inc., for construction of Fire Station #12 (CAG-02-177) for cost increases due to replacing the original contractor who was operating under an invalid contract; payment by E. Kent Halvorson to subcontractors for work done through March, 2003, totaling $87,257.52; and an additional appropriation of $884,131 to cover increased costs and an appropriation adjustment. Refer to Committee of the Whole. Development Services: Amrik Development Services Division recommended acceptance of dedication of Singh Short Plat ROW additional right-of-way for a six-foot strip of land along S. Tillicum St. to fulfill Dedication on S Tillicum St a requirement of the Amrik Singh Short Plat (SHP-03-027). Council concur. Planning: 2002 Countywide Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department Planning Policies Amendments recommended adoption of a resolution ratifying the 2002 amendments to the Growth Management Planning Council's Countywide Planning Policies. Refer to Planning and Development Committee. Finance: Signatures for Finance and Information Systems Department recommended approval of a Banking Transactions resolution updating signature authorities for depositories and electronic fund August 4, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 272 transfers for the City, due to personnel changes. Council concur. (See page 274 for resolution.) Plat: Brookefield, Hoquiam Hearing Examiner recommended approval, with conditions, of the Brookefield Ave NE, PP-03-003 Preliminary Plat; 47 single-family lots on 7.16 acres located at 1024 and 1050 Hoquiam Ave. NE (PP-03-003). Council concur. Plat: Cedar Avenue, Cedar Hearing Examiner recommended approval, with conditions, of the Cedar Ave S, PP-02-125 Avenue Preliminary Plat; 50 single-family lots on 9.9 acres located at 3521 Cedar Ave. S. (PP-02-125). Council concur. Human Services: 2004 CDBG Human Services Division recommended setting a public hearing on 9/08/2003 Funds Allocation to consider the allocation of the 2004 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds as recommended by the Human Services Advisory Committee. Refer to Community Services Committee; set a public hearing for 9/08/2003. Technical Services: King Technical Services Division recommended approval of King County's request County Utilities Easements, for utility easements across the Airport and Cedar River Trail Park properties Airport & Cedar River Trail for the amount of $262,830. Refer to Utilities Committee. Park Transportation: Traffic Transportation Systems Division requested authorization to purchase electronic Management Center Electronic equipment and the system installation for the Traffic Management Center from Equipment, NetVersant NetVersant under the State Department of Information Systems contract in the amount of $220,150.06 plus tax, bonds and permits. Refer to Transportation Committee. CAG: 02-082, CT Detention Utility Systems Division submitted CAG-02-082, CT Detention Pipeline for Pipeline for Wells R1 R2 & Wells Rl, R2 & R3 and Park Improvements; and requested approval of the R3, RL Alia Company project, authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of $100, commencement of 60-day lien period, and release of retainage bond to R.L. Alia Company, contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. Utility: Kennydale Lakefront Utility Systems Division recommended approval to transfer funds in the amount Sewer Improvement Project, of $100,000 from the Sewer Main Replacement and Rehabilitation account to Fund Transfer the Kennydale Lakefront Sewer Improvement Project account to cover additional project costs. Refer to Utilities Committee. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED TO REMOVE ITEM 9.e. FOR SEPARATE CONSIDERATION. CARRIED. Separate Consideration City Clerk reported bid opening on 7/30/2003 for CAG-03-116, S. Grady Way Item 9.e. & Rainier Ave. S. Pavement Rehabilitation; one bid; engineer's estimate CAG: 03-116, S Grady $410,730; and submitted staff recommendation to award the contract to the sole Way/Rainier Ave S Pavement bidder, Gary Merlino Construction Company, Inc., in the amount of $446,862. Rehab, Gary Merlino Const Co MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL APPROVE ITEM 9.e. AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence was read from Norman G. Wilcox, 916 N. 34th St., Renton, Citizen Comment: Wilcox - 98056, listing community organizations, events and agencies that receive Fireworks Sales by Kennydale monies earned from the sale of fireworks by the Kennydale Lions Club. Lions Club MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE. CARRIED. August 4, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 273 OLD BUSINESS Community Services Committee Chair Nelson presented a report Community Services recommending concurrence in the Mayor's appointment of Jeremy Chambers to Committee the Municipal Arts Commission for an unexpired three-year term that expires Appointment: Municipal Arts December 31, 2003, replacing Virginia Corder who resigned. MOVED BY Commission NELSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Finance Committee Finance Committee Vice Chair Corman presented a report recommending Finance: Vouchers approval of Claim Vouchers 217405 - 217810 and two wire transfers totaling $1,812,540.56; and approval of Payroll Vouchers 45295 - 45619, one wire transfer and 577 direct deposits totaling $1,864,932.15. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Transportation (Aviation) Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chair Persson presented a report Committee regarding the Berger/Abaco Engineers, Inc. contract for Duvall Ave. NE Transportation: NE Sunset intersection improvements design services. On October 14, 2002, the City was Blvd & Duvall Ave NE selected to receive a Hazard Elimination Safety Program grant for design and Intersection Improvements, construction funding for the Duvall Ave. NE and SR-900 (NE Sunset Blvd.) Berger/Abaco Engineers Intersection Improvements Project. This project will reduce congestion and accident frequency at this intersection, which is currently a High Accident Location. The Transportation Division selected Berger/Abam Engineers, Inc. to design the project in the amount of $59,000, which will be carried out from 2003 through 2004, with construction to begin in 2005 and completed in 2006. The approved 2003 budget for Duvall Ave. NE (SR-900 to the northern City limits) project includes the improvements to the intersection of NE Sunset Blvd. and Duvall Ave. NE. The 2003 budget is $570,900 of which $59,000 has been split out for this intersection work. This project is being separated out and tracked financially due to the receipt of Federal funding. The Committee recommended that Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into the agreement with Berger/Abam Engineers, Inc. in the amount of $59,000 for design services for the Duvall Ave. NE intersection improvements. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Transportation: Duvall Ave Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chair Persson presented a report NE Improvements, regarding the contract with Berger/Abam Engineers, Inc. for the Duvall Ave. Berger/Abam Engineers NE widening project design services. On June 10, 2002, the City entered into an agreement with the Transportation Improvement Board to accept grant funding for design and construction for the Duvall Ave. NE Widening Project. The project will widen Duvall Ave. NE from two lanes to five lanes, from SR- 900 (NE Sunset Blvd.) to the northern City limits. This project along with other improvements should reduce congestion and accident frequency, raising levels of service towards the service standards adopted by the City to achieve compliance with the Growth Management Act. The Transportation Division has selected Berger/Abam Engineers, Inc. to design the project for the amount of $744,500, and the project will be carried out from 2003 through 2004, with construction scheduled to begin in 2005 and completed in 2006. The approved 2003 budget for this project allocates a total budget of $570,900 ($59,000 is allocated for the Duvall Ave. NE intersection improvement design services project). Funds in the amount of $269,675 have been split out for the mid -block City work in 2003. The remaining funding will come from the 2004 August 4, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 274 budget allocation anticipated and approved in the 2004-2009 TIP (Transportation Improvement Program) in the amount of $474,825. This project is being separated out and tracked financially due to grant funding. The Committee recommended that Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into the agreement with Berger/Abaco Engineers, Inc. in the amount of $744,500 for design services for the Duvall Ave. NE Widening Project. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Transportation: Duvall Ave Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chair Persson presented a report NE Improvements, King regarding the interagency agreement with King County regarding improvements County to Coal Creek Parkway (King County's portion of the Duvall Ave. NE Widening Project). On June 10, 2002, the City entered into an agreement with the Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) to accept grant funding for design and construction of the Duvall Ave. NE Widening Project. The project will widen Duvall Ave. NE from two to five lanes from SR-900 (NE Sunset Blvd.) to the northern City limits. This project should reduce congestion and accident frequency, raising levels of service towards the service standards adopted by the City to achieve compliance with the Growth Management Act. King County has also entered into an agreement with TIB to accept grant funding for design and construction for the widening improvement of Duvall Ave. NE directly north of the City's Duvall Ave. NE Widening Project (between the Renton northern City limits and the City of Newcastle southern City limits at SE 95th Way). King County and Renton would like to work together on this project under the project management of the City of Renton, with King County funding its share of both design and construction. The Committee recommended that Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into the agreement with King County for the Duvall Ave. NE Widening Project in unincorporated King County. The Committee further recommended that the resolution regarding the matter be presented for reading and adoption. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See later this page for resolution.) ORDINANCES AND The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption: RESOLUTIONS Resolution #3648 A resolution was read authorizing signature for depositories and electronic fund Finance: Signatures for transfers on behalf of and in the name of the City of Renton. MOVED BY Banking Transactions KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #3649 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Transportation: Duvall Ave interagency agreement between King County and the City of Renton regarding NE Improvements, King improvements to Coal Creek Parkway (King County's portion of the Duvall County Ave. NE Widening Project), from the Renton City limits in the vicinity of NE 23rd St. and NE 24th St. to SE 95th Way. MOVED BY KEOLKER- WHEELER, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. The following ordinances were presented for first reading and advanced for second and final reading: August 4, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 275 Vacation: Whitworth Ave S, An ordinance was read vacating a portion of Whitworth Ave. S. between S. 3rd St. Anthony's Parish, VAC-00- and 4th Streets, and a portion of the alley running north and south between 003 Whitworth and Morris Avenue S. and S. 3rd and 4th Streets (St. Anthony's Parish; VAC-00-003). MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL ADVANCE THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING. CARRIED. Ordinance #5015 Following second and final reading of the above -referenced ordinance, it was Vacation: Whitworth Ave S, MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, St. Anthony's Parish, VAC-00- COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL 003 AYES. CARRIED. Vacation: Alley between An ordinance was read vacating a portion of the alley running north and south Whitworth & Morris Aves S, between Whitworth and Morris Avenues S. and S. 3rd and 4th Streets (St. and S 3rd & 4th Sts, St. Anthony's Parish; VAC-03-001). MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY Anthony's Parish, VAC-03-001 KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL ADVANCE THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING. CARRIED. Ordinance #5016 Following second and final reading of the above -referenced ordinance, it was Vacation: Alley between MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, Whitworth & Morris Aves S, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL and S 3rd & 4th Sts, St. AYES. CARRIED. Anthony's Parish, VAC-03-001 ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 10:47 p.m. 43pi c.« 4. Wa d BONNIE I. WALTON, City Clerk Recorder: Michele Neumann August 4, 2003 CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDAR Office of the City Clerk COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING August 4, 2003 COMMITTEE/CHAIRMAN DATE/TIME AGENDA COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE (Keolker-Wheeler) COMMUNITY SERVICES (Nelson) FINANCE (Parker) PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT (Briere) PUBLIC SAFETY (Clawson) MON., 8/11 Budget/Financial Issues Follow -Up; 5:30 p.m. Fire Station #12 Budget and Construction Amendments MON., 8/11 Vouchers 4:30 p.m. THURS., 8/07 Growth Management Planning Council 2:00 p.m. Countywide Planning Policies; Highlands Redevelopment Area — Harrington Square MON., 8/11 Musicians Hall Safety Concerns 5:00 p.m. TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) THURS., 8/07 Traffic Management Center Electronic (Persson) 3:00 p.m. Equipment Purchase & System Installation; King County Carr Rd. Corridor Project (briefing only) UTILITIES THURS., 8/07 King County Request for Utility (Corman) 2:30 p.m. Easements across Airport & Cedar River Trail Park; Kennydale Lakefront Sewer Improvement Project Fund Transfer NOTE: Committee of the Whole meetings are held in the Council Chambers. All other committee meetings are held in the Council Conference Room unless otherwise noted. 4 rtNIL . r1di MIX, _�.. Mayor Jesse Tanner Wh.e,ww, agriculture is one of the cornerstones of the Washington State economy, providing nearly 90,000 jobs annually; and WTw-weak, Washington's growers make an essential contribution to our local communities and to the well-being of our citizens; and Wh4P,rea4, the Renton Farmers Market is in its second year of operation, open each Tuesday during the summer from 3:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. in Renton's beautiful downtown Piazza; and Wh.erea4, the Renton Farmers Market is dedicated to supporting Washington's family farms and to providing opportunities for the citizens of Renton and surrounding communities to meet local producers and gain access to the bounty of Washington -grown products in all their diversity, fresh from the family farm; and Wh.ew'ea a, the Renton Farmers Market benefits local businesses by attracting hundreds of potential patrons each week; and W he4,-eCW, the congenial atmosphere of the Renton Fanners Market appeals to citizens of all ages and ethnic backgrounds, creates a positive social experience, and provides nutritional and economic benefits; Now, 731eefore, I, Jesse Tanner, Mayor of the City of Renton, do hereby proclaim the week of August 9 through 16, 2003, to be: Fa41-m,exk M a vketW e, e_ k. in the City of Renton, and I urge all citizens to join me in recognizing the many benefits of our local farmers market. In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the City of Renton to be affixed this 4' day of August, 2003. esse Tand-er, Mayor of the City of Renton, Washington 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425) 430-6500 / FAX (425) 430-6523 ® This paper contains 50 % recycled material, 30 % post consumer RENT®T AHEAD OF THE CURVE The Custer Bequest History Most of you are familiar with the high points of the bequest given to the Renton Historical Society by Charles Custer. It consisted of the contents of a vacation home in Three Tree Point, Charles' home and its 12-14,000 objects, two lots upon which First Savings Bank rests along with the associated lease, and some cash. The executor, Harry Blencoe, along with Wyman Dobson acting as legal advisor estimated the value of the bequest to the Society at $1.3 million. ThP FgtntP The initial cash disbursement made by the executor was set into a standard account, with a portion deposited into the Renton Community Fund. The remainder was held to balance any costs incurred with processing the bequest, such as house repairs, insurance and facilities expenses. Later disbursements went directly into the Renton Community Fund. The vacation home contained little of significance, though there were a number of small items of some novelty. Volunteers along with the Custer family cleaned out the property and disposed of any remaining unwanted items. The income realized from disposing of these and other objects within the house were earmarked specifically for strengthening the Renton Historical Museum's collections, to which end several important Puget Sound Salish (Duwamish/Suquamish) artifacts have been obtained. Charles house was in need of immediate repair. The roof and gutters had to be replaced and some structural pieces had to have some leak damage repaired. After the Nisqually Quake of 2001, the foundation required some work near the fireplace to reposition and strengthen it. Other minor repairs were done by either volunteers or contractors as appropriate. The landscape required some attention. The garage roof also had to be replaced, along with some wood in the walls that had rotted. Some of the funds from the bequest were budgeted for this work, amounting to between $20 and. 30 thousand. The Society Board then had to determine what was to be done with the house. A landmarks assessment was executed, which determined that the house, while unique, did not qualify as a significant historic landmark. Other options were considered. The house wouldn't make a good second museum because of the lack of staffing and parking, ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) upgrades, maintenance, and zoning issues. Converting to some business such as a B & B would have similar issues. Renting it out as a home would have major liability and maintenance issues. All of these options would require continued high-level attention from the Board and absorb inordinate amounts of volunteer time. Finally, the house was considered as a potential storage facility for artifacts. An analysis of the option of holding the house for five years revealed that it was costing the Society approximately $2,000 a month. The city also advised that there would be a zoning issue if the use was non- residential. With the new understanding of the costs of ownership, the accessioning/processing (documentation, cataloging and incorporation into the Museums collection) of the artifacts on site was curtailed in favor of getting the house empty as soon as practical to facilitate a sale. The artifacts are, without doubt, the most exciting part of the bequest. Charles and his parents, George and Annie, retained a great deal of their own as well as city history, including documents, furniture and household items, and especially photographs. Many of the furniture pieces were nearly as old as the house and were traceable to their original purchase by the Custers. While similar pieces were held already in the Museums collection, often the pieces from the Custer home were far more documented as to use and therefore of more historic value. Comparisons and assessments had to be made piece by piece. Lesser pieces had to be disposed of because of the limits of storage available to the Museum. With over 3,000 — 4,000 objects yet uncatalogued, there remain years worth of documentation work to do with the contents retained from the house. The house sold in June of this year to a couple that is very fond of the restoration of older homes. They were delighted to find this house so close to original condition and estimate that their costs shouldn't exceed $40,000 to correct maintenance issues. Their intent is to accumulate as much history about the house as possible. They are currently working with the museum's staff on this effort. After closing the sale, accounting showed that the final cleared balance was only $4,000 less than the appraised valuation given the Society by the executor. The bank property and the associated lease were set aside at first, as the house condition demanded immediate attention. Eventually an examination of the lease revealed that it contained far more value than the land. This value was not obvious in the original appraisal of the estate. Maintaining our roles as trustees of this property for the State of Washington and the Citizens of Renton, we consulted with a real estate attorney and a commercial appraiser. The Board came to understand that important decisions had to be made with regards to the sale or retention of the property. Continuing to lease the property to the bank would eventually require a renegotiation of the lease, with the attendant legal tangles and distractions to the Board, and landlord status would be a permanent addition to the Boards tasks. The commercial appraiser's information indicated that a long-term lease could potentially be of more economic value to the Society, but this would be over a ten to twenty year period and net present value suggested that the difference would be less significant. After review options, the Board approved offering the property for sale to the bank. Negotiations concluded swiftly and that sale closed in early January of this year. Proceeds on that sale were in excess of the valuation given in the initial estate appraisal, though we incurred costs to assure appropriate legal issues were covered and our fiduciary responsibilities to the Secretary of State were responsibly executed. The Financials As noted above, the original bequest was valued at $1.3 million. With the sale of the bank property under more advantageous conditions and assuming other appraisals are still accurate, that number is closer to $2 million now. Some of that is in the artifacts that the Society will retain. Other costs associated with assuring careful handling of the choices the Board faced consumed some $10-20 thousand. To ensure sustained ongoing support of operations, one million dollars was transferred to the endowment fund, now designated the George and Annie Custer Endowment Fund, and the Endowment Committee is being reformed as an Investment Committee and will be responsible for assuring a sustained return from this fund to cover Museum operations. The future of the funds currently in the RCF is also being assessed. The issue is a combination of access and return balanced against the interests that the RCF supports. The proceeds from the house have been assigned to an account specific to a building fund for a future new museum structure. We feel that the current museum operation has outgrown its storage and exhibit capabilities at the existing site. The remainder of the funds have been supporting two part time employees: a volunteer coordinator and a curator. Because of the meager pay and part time nature of the position, we are on our third curator in a year, but hope to be able to retain her for a time. The Museum and the Custer Artifacts For more than two years the Custer bequest has dominated the work of the Board and the Museum Director. While it has been an undeniable blessing, it has not been without adverse impact. The Director has voluntarily shouldered a number of Board responsibilities to help keep operations running smoothly, and some progress within the Museum has suffered as a consequence. Displays that are supposed to be dynamic are remaining static for much longer periods of time. Artifact donations to the Museum are not being accessioned as fast as they are coming in. Satellite displays placed in prominent business locations in the city are not being serviced as often as needed. Volunteers are trying to support a large volume of requests for historical research, information and photographic reproduction from the archives. The Custer collection will require attention for at least two more years to truly understand and catalog the treasures found there. Every week there are finds within the photographs and pieces to excite the historian interested in Renton's past. Storage concerns will have to be addressed in the very near term. There is no space available to the Museum for the development of new displays and no place to store current displays so that new ones can be built up to replace them. The Board recognizes that this bequest has moved the Society and the Museum dramatically up the curve to becoming a more professional and substantial part of the community, but care must be taken to assure that the vision and planning keep up. The financial boon could easily vanish if spending choices don't align to a solid long term and sustainable vision of what the Museum is to become. What are we doing for the near -term? • Address immediate storage issues and the Roxy marquee display through the addition of a mezzanine within the Museum. • Resume updating displays • Look for better ways to accession to meet the rate of donations • Examine enhancements to the external appearance of the Museum to encourage visitors • Reconnect to the community through events, Board contacts, joint efforts with other volunteer groups and media exposure What about the long term? • Build a vision and a plan that satisfies the display and storage limitations on a more permanent basis • Build a vision within the community of a Museum as part of the cultural center • Develop a solid financial plan to make the visions happen • Make historic preservation a valued part of the future of the city Y -( A, - �\ba )-+- 1 "ARLO ANNEXATION PUBLIC MEETING CIL CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED ANNEXATION WITH R-8 ZONING August 4, 2003 The City is in receipt of a Notice of Intention to Commence Annexation Petition from property owners in the proposed annexation area representing approximately 24 % of the area's ±37 acres. The subject site is within the City's Potential Annexation Area and is designated as Residential Single Family on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Because the site currently has County R-4 zoning, it is the City's intent to rezone it R-8, 8 units per net acre upon annexation. With this zoning the site would accommodate approximately 183 additional single-family dwelling units. The site is located in the City's East Renton Plateau Potential Annexation Area. The annexation site appears to have reasonable boundaries. The annexation site abuts the City on portions of its northern and western boundaries. 136th Avenue SE (Bremerton Avenue NE), if extended, would define its western boundary and 140th Avenue SE, if extended, would define its eastern boundary. Another annexation site, Tydico, is located immediately west of the northern half of this annexation. The site is relatively flat and not known to have any critically sensitive areas. It currently consists of 20 parcels and an estimated 17 detached single-family dwellings. Under the recently adopted new rules amending RCW 35A.14.120, direct petitions to annex are initiated by property owners representing at least 10% of the annexation area's acreage submitting a Notice of Intention to Commence Annexation Proceedings petition to City Council. Council is required to hold tonight's public meeting in order to decide whether the City will accept, reject or geographically modify the proposed annexation. If the Council decides to accept the proposed annexation it will: 1. Authorize the circulation of the new 50% Petition to Annex: 2. Decide whether to require the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning or existing prezoning; and, 3. Decide whether to require property owners within the annexation area to assume their fair share of the City's existing indebtedness. Council Hearing Handout 08-04-03.doc\ !] Existing Condi • PAA - Within Renton's Poten • Location - Between 136th Av 140th Ave SE on the east, city Street on the north, and SE 13 the south. • Size - + 37 acres, including at • Uses - 17 single-family dwell • Boundaries - site abuts Rentol northern and western boundar Existing Conditions Structures Map Existing Conditions S. 47th St PIP 1 „ s_ s 1920.� Vicinity Map Existing Conditions - Topography Map L- - 1 v Existing Conditions Sensitj Sensitive Areas Map King County Designation and KC. Land Use May - Urban Residential 4-12di KC. Zoning - R-4 - Residential 4 du/ac County Zoning Map . ................. .._... __... . View looking northeast towards eastem Existing Conditions - P • Fire - Fire District 25 • Utilities —W ithin Renton Water Utility Service Area —W ithin Renton Sewer Utility Service Area • Schools —W ithin Renton School District 2 Fiscal Impact • General Fund cost and i implications —Assumes potential of ± ; homes at full developmc wide R-8 Zone average — Assumes assessed home — Assumes 17 dwellings • Furthers City Business Goals • Generally consistent with Cit • Consistent with City policies rezones • Generally consistent with Bo Board criteria • Revenue surplus at full devel, • Surface Water indicates some area - suggests mitigation wit • Except for parks no major sei • Best interests and general we, Fiscal Impact Carlo Annex Recommended • Accept 10% Notice of I Commence Annexation • Authorize circulation Petition to Annex • Require the adoption of • Require assumption of a share of City's existing c indebtedness 3 MERRITT ANNEXATION PUBLIC MEETING COUNCIL CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED ANNEXATION WITH R-1 ZONING August 4th, 2003 The City is in receipt of a Notice of Intention to Commence Annexation Petition from a property owner in the proposed annexation area representing approximately 100% of the area's 4.81 acres. The subject site is within the City's Potential Annexation Area and is primarily designated as Residential Rural (RR) on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. This site was prezoned R-1 in 1997 and currently has the County's R-1 zoning on it. With the City's R-1 zoning the site could accommodate approximately three additional single-family dwelling units. The site is located in the City's East Renton Plateau Potential Annexation Area. The annexation site appears to have reasonable boundaries. The annexation site abuts the City and the Stonegate Subdivision on its southern and eastern boundaries. The two parcels to the immediate north were recently extended City sewer but were not required to sign covenants not opposing future annexation because, at that time, we did not have a substitute petition method and could not dictate how people voted in the secrecy of the voting booth. The southern boundary of the site is approximately SE 100th Street, if extended, and the eastern boundary is Lyons Avenue NE, if extended. The site slopes from the northwest to the southeast at about a 15%-25% slope. The northern third of the site is within a "high erosion hazard boundary" as identified on the City's sensitive areas maps. The site currently consists of a single parcel with one existing single-family detached dwelling on it. Under the recently adopted new rules amending RCW 35A.14.120, direct petitions to annex are initiated by property owners representing at least 10% of the annexation area's acreage. The Notice of Intention to Commence Annexation Proceedings petition is then forwarded to the Council. Council is required to hold tonight's public meeting in order to decide whether the City will accept, reject or geographically modify the proposed annexation. If the Council decides to accept the proposed annexation it will: 1. Authorize the circulation of the new 50% Petition to Annex: 2. Decide whether to require the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning or existing prezoning; and, 3. Decide whether to require property owners within the annexation area to assume their fair share of the City's existing indebtedness. Council Hearing Handout 08-04-03.doc\ 7'. Existing Condi • PAA - Within Renton's Poten • Location - at City limits imme Stonegate at intersection of Sl Ave NE • Size - 4.8 acres • Uses - 1 single-family dwellin • Boundaries - site abuts Rentoi southern and eastern boundari Merfitt Anne Annexation Public August 4, 20 Topography Map 1 14 Existing Conditions -Se ........... Sensitive Areas Map King County • King County Comp Plan land use designation —G reenbelt/Urban Separator Site Looking west into annexation site Existing Conditions - • Fire - Fire District 10 • Utilities —W ithin Water District 90 —W ithin Renton Sewer Service Area • Schools - Within Issaquah School District King County KC. Zonin - R-1 - Residential I dulac County Zoning 2 r Renton Comp Plan and Current Pr Renton Comp Plan Land Use Map - Residential Rural Existing Renton Pre - zoning - R-1 (1 du/net acre) Renton Fiscal Impact Merritt Anne: Recommended • Accept 10% Notice of Ir Commence Annexation • Authorize circulation of Petition to Annex • Require assumption of a share of City's existing t indebtedness Fiscal Impact • General Fund cost and re implications — Assumes potential of four homes at full development wi de R-1 Zone average — Assumes assessed new ho $290, 000 — Assumes 1 dwellings curr • Furthers City Business Goals • Generally consistent with Cit • Site already prezoned R-1, 1 • Generally consistent with Bo Board criteria • Minor revenue deficit at full • No major service issues idenl • Best interests and general we Cj Y MOSIER ANNEXATION PUBLIC MEETING COUNCIL CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED ANNEXATION WITH R-8 AND R-5 ZONING August 4, 2003 The City is in receipt of a Notice of Intention to Commence Annexation Petition from property owners in the proposed annexation area representing approximately 22 % of the area's ±31 acres. The subject site is within the City's Potential Annexation Area and is primarily designated as Residential Rural (RR) on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The northern 3.43 acres of the site are designated Residential Single Family (RS). Because the site currently has County R-4 zoning, it is the City's intent to rezone the northern RS portion to R-8, 8 units per net acre upon annexation and the southern RR portion to R-5, 5 units per net acre. With this zoning the site would accommodate approximately 112 additional single-family dwelling units. The site is located in the City's East Renton Plateau Potential Annexation Area. The annexation site appears to have reasonable boundaries. The annexation site abuts the City on portions of its northern boundary and a portion of its western and eastern boundaries. 142nd Avenue SE (Hoquiam Ave NE), if extended, would define its western boundary and 144th Avenue SE (Jericho Ave NE), if extended, would define its eastern boundary. The southern boundary of the proposed annexation site is SE 1361h Street. All abutting street right-of-ways not currently in the City are proposed to be included in this annexation. The site is relatively flat and has probably a Class 4 (intermittent) stream, under the City's proposed stream critical areas ordinance standards, running east -west through the southern part of the stream. The site currently consists of 25 parcels with an estimated 21 detached single-family dwellings on it. Under the recently adopted new rules amending RCW 35A.14.120, direct petitions to annex are initiated by property owners representing at least 10% of the annexation area's acreage submitting a Notice of Intention to Commence Annexation Proceedings petition to City Council. Council is required to hold tonight's public meeting in order to decide whether the City will accept, reject or geographically modify the proposed annexation. If the Council decides to accept the proposed annexation it will: 1. Authorize the circulation of the new 50% Petition to Annex: 2. Decide whether to require the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning or existing prezoning; and, 3. Decide whether to require property owners within the annexation area to assume their fair share of the City's existing indebtedness. Council Hearing Handout 08-04-03.doc\ Mosier Annexation Public August 4, 20 Existing Conditions Structures Map 1 Existing Conditions -Sc Sensitive Areas Map Existing Envil • T000aranhv - essentially flat with slight slope • Environmental constraints Branch of Maplewood Creek traverses middle of southern half of site King County Cot Designation and Cun �F K.C. Land Use Map - f n� Urban Residential 4-12du/ac KC. Zoning -' R-4 - Residential 4 du/ac' Site County Looking southeast towards site from Existing Conditions - • Fire - Fire District 25 • Utilities —W ithin Water District 90 Service Area W ithin Renton Sewer Utility Service Area • School -Renton School District Renton Comp Plan and Proposed Renton Comp Plan Land Use Man - Residential Single Family & Residential Rural Proposed Renton Zoning Man - R-5 (5 du/net acre) 2 Fiscal Impact • General Fund cost and rev implications —Assum es potential of + 133 homes using city-wide R-5i — Assumes assessed home va — Assumes 21 dwellings • Furthers City Business Goals • Generally consistent with Cit • Consistent with City policies rezones • Generally consistent with Bo Board criteria • Revenue surplus at full devel • Surface Water indicates som( area - suggests mitigation wil • Except for parks no major sei • Best interests and general we Mosier Annexation Mosier Anne: Recommended • Accept 10% Notice of Commence Annexatio: • Authorize circulation Petition to Annex • Require the adoption • Require assumption c share of City's existii indebtedness Expanded Merritt K3 Expanded Mosier ± 41 acres 1)ugt'c $ aoo3 C) OF RE" NTON July 26, 2003 Mayor Jesse Tanner City Of Renton City Hall 1005 Grady Way South Renton, WA. 98055 RE: PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE MOSIER ANNEXATION J U L 2 8 2003 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE I own the property at 13017 144thAve SE, Tax Lot# 1523059090 and I am not able to attend the Public hearing on 8/4/03 "for the Mosier Annexation. I will be out of town attending a college Showcase Soccer Tournament with My Wife and three Daughters. I support the Mosier Annexation and would appreciate if you would make my letter of support part of the record at the public hearing. I am very excited and look forward to becoming part of the City of Renton. ours Steven A. Beck / 112q SC 1 g5-kh !;4-- IQ,tL4zrn, wA ggo59 Cc. Don Erickson COiillcii r1le ilbers July 26, 2003 Mayor Jesse Tanner City Of Renton City Hall 1005 Grady Way South Renton, WA. 98055 SUBJECT: MOSIER ANNEXATION n&4&'� S- V aoo3 CITY OF RENTOO JR 2 8 2003 RECEIVED C17Y CLERKS OFFICE.' We have received the notice of the Public hearing on 8/4/03 for the Mosier Annexation. Unfortunately we will not be able to attend due to a preplanned vacation with. Our family. We would like express our continued support for the annexation process and would you please include this letter as part of the public record. We look forward to the opportunity to become part of your great city. Sincerely Lauren & Lila Mosier 13025 - ►q�44i AvtSE Atn-hm, WA g7O5q Cc. Don Erickson Council members CITY OF RENTO U,, 0 2003 RECEIVED CI ,-'`CLERK'S OFFICE July 2SP 2003 Mayor Jesse Tanner City of Renton City Hall 1005 Grady Way South Renton, WA. 98055 RE: Public Hearing of Mosier Annexation I am the owner of several tax lots in Renton and the local area, Including Tax Lot 152305-9065 which is within the proposed annexation. I would like to go on record to show my support for the Mosier Annexation. This area would be a natural addition to Renton and follow the surrounding area's which have already been added to the City. It is also my understanding that the City is reviewing the zoning of this area. I support the change to R-8 which would make this area the same as the adjoining properties to the north, east and west. This would be a positive step for both Renton and the Renton Highlands. Craig Landon 10520 160' Ave SE Renton,WA. 98059 PUBLIC HEARING HANDOUT August 4, 2003, City Council Chambers, 7:30 PM APPLICATION NAME: Highlands Redevelopment Area Residential -Oriented Code Amendments. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposed code amendments modify the existing Suburban Center Residential Bonus District overlay in the Highlands Redevelopment Area to permit increased density and urban demographic parking requirements in exchange for additional design and open space requirements. The code amendment specifically increases allowed density to 80 dwelling units per net acre for the Highlands Redevelopment Area, as shown on attached map. Developers using this bonus must provide parking in a structure, include some sort of commercial mixed -use in the project, and adhere to additional design guidelines and open space requirements to obtain this density. The code amendment also permits parking for residential use at the same ratio as permitted in the City's Downtown based upon urban demographics for the type of development anticipated in this area. The code amendment package also includes corrections to unit types allowed in the base Center Suburban zone within the Highlands Redevelopment area and the Suburban and Neighborhood Center Residential Bonus District. RECOMMENDATION: Council adopt the code revisions allowing additional density and urban parking standards in exchange for higher design and open space thresholds, and correcting use types allowed, as presented. HIGHLANDS REDEVELOPMENT AREA cm 5 " 4 q q jj 1 Lv. � ate+ CJ � S= "' � O °i� r....�, ���t'.���e1b:••,1�14��,•�,'...�,�;i, sf..i:,, .�. 4��.. � C� ^ Ca yy��yy O d� E a g U, Y cTlAp/�a �, h� �9.� 7,e (v • (�^ '� �) S„y .•5: •4 k�i�. :.Z3� '.i}•, �cT E'^ c3 m ,r .� r z'4�a .d 1 i �' - I ey IC A ',.r ra- � U .a Cv pFdd � �vUvx �a►.�C� pg", � i i f o e. Cd2 t� :03 o r`3 CD u� era j{ '3 `? �' �' N C rl rD CD CD N CD o IMM .Y O al N O •U-' U � 'd ' U N N •� � '�"•�� V O O N O � � O N i � U to Ua b N l b L ca > •� N O O p d colc O 0 O "" CO') CJ v Ll u u p 5 u O O O Gii C N d ..+ O ^O ..•d C3 7 fl. L U OL U Ndr p O vi O am O vt O c) ¢ U RS i.. V Gi O U 4) U .� ai. O U Y O Q' U -0 by v� ^ � >✓ i G bD C/i .Y cG U rn Ocz C) C/7 'n'° LL ty O O U :� 4+ p ._ O N c�C N .�Q Of) Q i Q aj u O U UN Ln7. Q^ 's•�O� •,���1j ti >US uU fn W)� ;"a.' { U Y. U O.� J U >•+.1 ..dF i - "-.}: •o� Oc�OOOl C a. CL 'U •!= 'O u cl -rr•i?.� is . v U U I Q Cn Cr N a ; aCD rn�pTs•oagn tl o b �-o C . • �c 0. fD O O x O O n x 00 N ry O• w Cil - o• .�, n O. •=t ry tD G O � O ry Ua �•. � Ua UQ w CD p j n s`�i � � (p 7. Q p O =.•. � O C®l tla .:. _. ® .ems G � -i G G •-t .°tea C _ (17 O Z. 0 t( S "O'�1 CD G �_ (/7 rp—q Cy O m U 4. l7 tii O c r•'i n_, v' =' v' (� m `"�^ M' tCj (IQM N C 2�-' CDrDUo ¢' Q� vi mZ x ry _ []• R. p v, O tlaCOD CD i CD CG Gn 0 o C Q 0 o n oa -D' CD YA c CD _ CD _ to G � N a-•9• N �. p. � � r-P ry r ri (n oo a L �\ \ eE m= EA ZO 0 3\ =§5\@ �§P— a `9G /=Buee.�ue </2 o=§ CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: August 4, 2003 TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Council President Members of the Renton City Council FROM: Jesse Tanner, Mayor Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer SUBJECT: Administrative Report In addition to our day to -day activities, the following items are worthy of note for this week: ADMINISTRATIVE, JUDICIAL, AND LEGAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT • The August edition of CitySource, the City's newsletter to citizens and businesses, will be included in the August 6`h issue of the Renton Reporter. This edition features articles about the Centennial Marker walking tour, Citizen of the Year nominations, Jalisco Week in Washington, upcoming Police Department Citizens Academy, mid -year residential building permit update, the Library catalog modem disconnection, and Renton City Council highlights. For an electronic version of CitySource, visit the Spotlight section of the City's website at www.ci.renton.wa.us. • The Government of the State of Jalisco, Mexico, along with the Jalisco Community in the Puget Sound area and the Renton-Cuautla Sister City Committee, will present Jalisco Week in Washington, August 15`s through 170', in Renton. The three-day fair will feature five live performances by the prestigious International Mariachi of America and Ballet Folklorico of Guadalajara, crafts and traditional products exhibits, cultural activities, and tourist information about Jalisco. The events will take place at the newly remodeled Renton High School and the all new Renton IKEA Performing Arts Center located at 400 South Second Avenue. • On Saturday, July 260, the City's 2003 Parade Float received a I st Place Award in the Float Division at the IKEA Renton River Days Parade, and the Seafair Queen Award at the Torchlight Parade in Seattle. The float features elements of a Farmers Market with three colorful awnings covering large-scale fruits and vegetables, giant flowers, and large wicker baskets. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT • The City's Community Resource Directory has been updated. Printed in English, Spanish, Vietnamese, and Russian, this Directory is designed to provide information about available resources in our diverse community. Primary points of distribution include Human Services Providers, Renton School District, Department of Social and Health Services, post offices, libraries, Valley Medical Center, Seattle -King County Department of Public Health, and Renton City Hall. Copies may be obtained from Human Services by calling 425430-6650. • Held during Renton River Days, the annual Friends of the Renton Public Library used book sale generated $2,896.00 ($293.00 more than last year). Also noteworthy were the increased number of donated items and the return of experienced volunteers. Prior to the 10:00 a.m. start, they had moved more than 200 boxes out of storage, and helped unpack and display them. To show their appreciation to these volunteers, the library staff provided refreshments and a pizza lunch on Friday. • The annual tennis carnival will be held this Tuesday, August 50', from 1:00 to 3:00 p.m. at the McKnight Middle School tennis courts. Co -sponsored with the United States Tennis Association, activities will include games, contests, refreshments, and prizes. Administrative Report August 4, 2003 Page 2 • The Recreation Division will host the annual Lake Washington Challenge Cup Lifeguard Games at Coulon Beach this Wednesday and Thursday, August 60' and 7 h, from 6:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. In addition to Renton, nine teams from other agencies will participate in first aid drills, and individual and team competitions. • Last Thursday, July 31", from noon to 1:00 p.m., over 200 children, parents, and friends enjoyed the music of the Brian Waite Band featured at Picnic Pizzazz, the kid's entertainment lunchtime series. The fun continues at Kiwanis Park on August 7`h, featuring Rhys Thomas, and at Liberty Park on August 10, featuring the Bubble Man Gary Golightly. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING DEPARTMENT • The Honey Creek Ridge Homeowners Association will hold their annual neighborhood picnic Wednesday, August 60', from 6:00 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. at their neighborhood common area, located at Olympia NE and NE 20 Street. Residents are encouraged to attend the picnic to get to know their immediate neighbors and meet City representatives. PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT • The public is invited to a special ceremony to re -dedicate the Will Rogers -Wiley Post Seaplane Base memorial. The ceremony will be held at 4:00 p.m. this Thursday, August 7a, at the north end of the Renton Municipal Airport. The memorial was moved from a location near the Greater Renton Chamber of Commerce to the north end of the Airport, near the Seaplane Base dock area along the shore of Lake Washington. On August 7, 1935, famed humorist and writer Will Rogers and equally famous aviator Wiley Post departed Renton on a flight to determine the feasibility of an air passenger route from the West Coast to Russia. Their plane crashed a week later in Alaska. • Late last week Lakeside Industries started work on the 2003 street overlay program. Street paving work will be done during the month of August. POLICE DEPARTMENT • This Tuesday, August 501, twelve different Renton neighborhoods will participate in National Night Out. This is a program designed to heighten crime and drug prevention awareness; generate support for, and participation in, local anti -crime efforts; strengthen neighborhood spirit and police -community partnerships; and send a message to criminals letting them know neighborhoods are organized and will not tolerate crime and drugs. These neighborhoods have joined forces with the Renton Police Department to Give Crime and Drugs a Going Away Party. To find out if your area is hosting an event, please call the Crime Prevention Unit at 425-430- 7520. • During the week of August 5-11, the Police Department will be conducting traffic emphasis in the following areas: Renton Police Department Traffic Enforcement Emphasis August 5-11 Date 6:00 a.m. to Noon Noon to 6:00 p.m. All Da Motorcycles/Cars Motorcycles/Cars Radar Trailer August 5, Tuesday SW Sunset Blvd (turns/speed) Rainier Ave N (speed) 3000 blk, Park Ave N (speed) Maple Valle H (speed) 1700 blk, Glenwood Ave SE August 6, Wednesday Lk Washington Blvd (speed) SW Sunset Blvd (turns/speed) 1800 blk, Glenwood Ave SE (speed) 2900 blk, Burnett Ave N (speed) 1700 blk, Glenwood Ave SE August 7, Thursday 1600 blk, Harrington SE (speed) Maple Valle H (speed) Rainier/Grady Way (red lights) Rainier Ave N (speed) 1700 blk, Glenwood Ave SE August 8, Friday 1400 blk, Houser Way (speed) Lk Washington Blvd (speed) Rainier Ave N (speed) 1400 blk, Houser Way seed Maple Valley Hwy August 11, Monday 1100 blk, Carr Rd (speed) Maple Valle H (speed) 400 blk, Cedar Ave S (speed) 2600 blk, NE 7`' St (s eed Maple Valley Hwy National Night Out - August 5, 2003 District Name / Area Address / Location Time Contact Person Type Group R9 Cedar Park 400 blk Monroe Av NE 1800 Peg Victory ice cream social 425-271-7482 R9 Monterey Terrace 116 Capri Av NE 1800 Janet Bertagni dessert social 425-235-0178 R9 Peachtree Lane Condos 600 Bremerton PI NE 1830 Samantha Meredith dessert social 425-254-8317 R9 Windwood 500 Rosario Av NE 1900 Jim Rawley ice cream social front park 425-452-7197 R8 Renton Housing 970 Harrington Av NE 1800 Tom Tasca BBQ 425-226-0495 R8 Summerwind NE 23rd / Graham 1900 Debra Mikolaizik dessert social in the park 425-226-2926 R7 Kennydale 1308 N 26th St 1800 Sally Scott potluck 255-1005 R7 (Highlands) 2301 Dayton Av NE 1830 Dale Jenks potluck 425-225-1148 R6 Maplewood Glen 524 Pierce Av SE 1900 Pat Doan potluck 425-271-2628 R3 Rolling Hills Pool behind townhomes 1800 Michelle Lemke potluck on Rolling Hills Av 425-235-0382 R3 Tiffany Park 3100 SE 18th St 1900 Carol Roenecke dessert social end of cul-de-sac 425-271-7785 r�-Talbot Homes 37th / Morris 1830 Dallas Strand potluck vacant lot 425-228-4015 8/4/03, My name is Jane Hower, I reside at 1425 S. Puget Dr., #118, Renton (20 yrs) - 425-226-8332 I am here to ask this council to reconsider and reverse the decision you made in January of this year in which you "Agreed to recognize the Matricula Consular as legal identification for Mexican citizens living in the United States." (Quote taken from the City of Renton web site for council meeting notes) In the red.folder that I have prepared for each member of the council is some research I did on the inter -net regarding this ID card. With little effort I was able to find document after document showing that this ID card should not be recognized as a legal form of ID. On the Department of Justice web site I found a Congressional Statement presented by the FBI (Doc. #1) wherein they state that "The crucial element in the acceptance of any consular ID card is the ability to verify the actual true identity of the bearer of the card." It further states "It is believed that consular ID cards are primarily being utilized by illegal aliens in the United States. ... The Department of Justice and the FBI have concluded that the Matricula Consular is not a reliable form of identification, due to the non- existence of any means of verifying the true identity of the card holder." It goes on to outline the problems with this card; for one, it allows criminals to fraudulently obtain the card. The Gov. of Mexico issues the card to anyone who can produce a birth certificate, which is a major item in the fraudulent document trade. This results in two problems: Major criminal threats and potential terrorist threats! At least one individual of Middle Eastern descent has been arrested in possession of the Matricula Consular card. These cards essentially give illegal immigrants the ability to live in the U.S. as legal aliens, undermining efforts to control immigration, and threatening our security. All of the 'nice' reasons you can come up with for recognizing this card pale in comparison to the criminal and terrorist risk reasons for NOT recognizing the card. The U.S., and the City of Renton, have certain duties to its citizens - such as ensuring national security and defending against international and domestic fraud and terrorism. Colorado recently outlawed use of the card (please see Doc. #6), 1 am hoping you will too. In an Issue Brief by the Federation for American Immigration Reform (Doc. #3) is the following quote: "...consular ID cards are only needed by people who aren't legally in the U.S. in the first place. Communities and businesses that accept the cards as valid ID are UNDERMINING IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT AND COMPROMISING U.S. SECURITY. (Capitalization is mine.) The primary function of government, at any level, is to protect it's citizens. By acknowledging this card and helping illegal aliens, you are aiding and abetting immigration fraud and putting true citizens in danger. We, as the City of Renton, are not a Foreign Policy branch of our U.S. Government. I cannot stand by while my tax dollars pay for you to pass `resolutions' which are in direct conflict with my Federal Government, especially on issues that involve our very security. As much as we all want to help our fellow man we all have locks on our front doors; this is why we have borders with laws to enforce them. And cheap labor is NOT cheap - many of our small town hospitals in So.Western states have gone bankrupt, thereby denying even lawful citizen proper health care nearby. Are we forgetting John Malvo? Arrested as an illegal alien in Seattle, but released, only to turn up in Wash. DC as a sniper? Or more recently, and closer to home, the shooting death of Chelan deputy, Saul Gallegos, who himself was a LEGAL immigrant from Mexico, who became a citizen and then a law enforcement agent, only to be killed by an illegal alien from Mexico. I am not against immigration, but I am for LEGAL immigration. Allowing easy access to government services, etc. by illegals is a slap in the face to those who came to our country legally, and love and respect our country. I do not understand why the City of Renton feels it can establish foreign policy with another nation. In the above mentioned brief it is stated: "The US Constitution does not permit a local or state government to decide, based on the advice or desires of a foreign government, that is own concerns override the will and intent of Congress. In choosing to recognize the consular ID card, local governments are raising significant legal issues by exercising a form of their own foreign policy." This is a dangerous precedent as at least five other foreign governments are already considering making similar cards. In post 9/11 days this is especially worrisome as we begin to lose control of our borders instead of increasing our national security. Among the many questions I have of the Council today is: did any of you do any research before voting to accept this ID card as a legal document? How long and often did you debate, discuss, or review this subject? If, as I was told, this 'idea' was brought to your attention by the legal department, do you know if they did any research prior to bringing it to you for a vote? Please read closely and carefully the documents in the folder I have given you. I will be back on following Monday night meetings to track your action on this issue. Thank you for your time and attention. Matricula Consular Articles: FBI Congressional Statement, FBI, 6/26/03 (3 pgs) I Washington Times article, 7/3/03: Mexican ID card still accepted 2 despite warnings from U.S. (3 of 12 pgs) FAIR (Federation for American Immigration Reform) Issue Brief: 3 The Mexican Matricula Consular Should Not Be Accepted for Official Purposes (3 pgs) Matricula Consular Article Archive: More on Mexican Sham ID's 4 (Articles from 30 newspapers, etc.) (5 of 7 pgs) Washington Times article, 6/13/03: Mexico's ID card gains more 5 acceptance in states, cities. (4 of 5 pgs) Friends of Immigration / Law Enforcement: 6 Matricula Consular & Secure ID Legislation (2 pgs) CAIR (Colorado Alliance for Immigration Reform), 6/2003 article: 7 The Mexican matricula consular (illegal alien) ID card is now illegal in Colorado & The Colorado Secure and Verifiable Identity Document Act (4 pgs), CAIR The Mexican "matricula consular" ID card: Safe or Sorry? (3 pgs); CAIR Safe or Sorry? Excepts from the debate (2 pgs) (Total 9 pgs) Center for Immigration Studies: g IDs for Illegals - The `Matricula Consular' Advances Mexico's Immigration Agenda (16 pgs) Seattle Times articles about slain Chelan deputy, Saul Gallegos - 9 (Never mentions that his killer was an illegal alien) (2 pgs) .. John Snow, Secretary to Treasury Holds Key to Killing Matricula . 10 Consular Cards. `Snow Time to Waste - Contact John Snow' (1 pg) FBI Press Room - Congressional Statement - 2003 - Consular ID Cards in a Post-9/11 Woi..d Page 1 of 3 June 26, 2003 Statement for the Record of Steve McCraw Assistant Director of The Office of Intelligence Federal Bureau of Investigation on Consular ID Cards in a Post-9/11 World Before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Claims on Consular ID Cards Washington, D.C. Chairman Hostettler, Ranking Member Jackson -Lee, and Members of the Subcommittee, the Federal Bureau of Investigation is pleased to have the opportunity to appear before you today to discuss the important issue of consular ID cards. The Department of Justice and the FBI have been charged by the President, with the support of Congress, to protect the American people from the continuing threats of terrorism and the crimes associated therewith. It is in the context of our post-9/11 world that we present our views and concerns to the Subcommittee today. Over the past two years, we have all seen a dramatically increased effort to promote and utilize consular ID cards as forms of identification for foreign nationals who are present in the United States. The Government of Mexico has been particularly aggressive in marketing the use of its consular ID card, the Matricula Consular. As a result of the extensive efforts to promote the use of the Matricula Consular, a number of other foreign countries are now considering the issuance of their own consular ID cards. The crucial element in the acceptance of any consular ID card is the ability to verify the ac ai- rue id-e—nfity-of the bearer o the card. In today's post-9/11 world, this e emen is a e more important because, in order to we must be able to determine whether an individual is essential in our mission o i entify potential terrorists, support, and prevent acts of terrorism from occurring. the e purports to be. This is their means of financial Since Mexico's Matricula Consular is currently the predominant consular ID card in existence, I will focus my comments today on this articular card. It is believed that consular ID cards are primarily being utilized by(illegaRaliens in the United S a es. oreign na ionaZs who are present in the U.S. legally have the ability to use various alternative forms of identification "most notably a passport" for the purposes of opening bank accounts, gaining access to federal facilities, boarding airplanes, and obtaining a state driver's license. In addition, foreign nationals who are present in the United States, either legally or illegally, have the ability to obtain a passport from their own country's embassy or consular office. The U.S. Government has done an extensive amount of research on the Matricula Consular, to assess its viability as a reliable means of identification. a De artment of Justice and the FBI have concluded t the Matricula Consula is no reliable ---- form of identification due tote non-existence of any means of verifying the true iden i of the card holder. The following are the primary problems with the Matricula http://www.fbi.gov/congress/congress03/mccraw062603.htm 7/11/2003 FBI Press Room - Congressional Statement - 2003 - Consular ID Cards in a Post-9/11 WoiA Page 2 of 3 ,i Consular that allow criminals fraudulently obtain the cards: First the Government of Mexico has no centralized database to coordinate the issuance of consular ID cards. This allows multiple cards to be issued under the same name, the same address, or with the same photograph. Second, the Government of Mexico has no interconnected databases to provide intra- o sular communication to be able to verify who has or has not applied for or received a consular ID card. T., the Government of Mexico issues the card Jo anyone who can produce a Mexican birth certificate and one other form of identity, including documents of very low reliability. Mexican birth certificates are easy to forge and they are a major item on the product list of the fraudulent document trade currently flourishing across the country and around the wort eptem er 2 bust of a document production operation in Washington state illustrated the size of this trade. A huge cache of fake Mexican birth certificates was discovered. It is our belief that the primary reason a market for these birth certificates exists is the demand for fraudulently -obtained Matricula Consular cards. Fourth, in some locations, when an individual seeking a Matricula Consular is unable o roduce an documents whatsoever he will still be issued a Matricula Con - , t e Mexican consu ar o icial, if he fills out a questionnaire and satisfies the official that he is who he purports to be. In addition to being vulnerable to fraud, the Matricula Consular is also vulnerable to LW. There have been several generations of the card; and even the newest version can be easily replicated, despite its security features. It is our estimate that more than 90 percent of Matricula Consular cards now in circulation are earlier versions of the card, which are little more than simple laminated cards without any secu As a result of these problems, there are two major criminal threats criminal threats posed by the cards, and one potential terrorist threat. The first criminal threat stems from the fact that the Matricula Consular can be a perfect breeder document for establishing a false identity. It is our understanding that as many as 13 states currently accept the Matricula Consular for the purpose of obtaining a drivers' license. Once in possession of a driver's license, a criminal is well on his way to using the false identity to facilitate a variety of crimes, from money laundering to check fraud. And of course, the false identity serves to conceal a criminal who is already being sought by law enforcement. Individuals have been arrested with multiple Matricula Consular cards in their possession, each with the same photograph, but with a different name. Matching these false Matriculas are false driver's licenses, also found in the criminals' possession. Such false identities are particularly useful to facilitate the crime of money laundering, as the criminal is able to establish one or more bank accounts under completely fictitious names. Accounts based upon such fraudulent premises greatly hamper money-laundering investigations once the criminal activity is discovered. As the Subcommittee is well aware, the FBI is particularly concerned about fraudulent financial transactions in the post 9/11 environment, given the fact that foreign terrorists often rely on money transferred from within the United States. The second criminal threat is that of alien smuggling, a crime that has resulted in many deaths within the past year. Federal officials have arrested alien smugglers who have had as many as seven different Matricula Consular cards in their possession. The cards not only conceal the identity of the smuggler, they also serve as a magnet for the victims who are enticed to entrust their lives to the smugglers, http://www.fbi.gov/congress/congress03/mccrawO62603.htm 7/11/2003 FBI Press Room - Congressional Statement - 2003 - Consular ID Cards in a Post-9/11 Woi.A Page 3 of 3 believing that the Matricula Consular that awaits them will entitle them to all sorts o benefits within the United States. These criminal threats are significant, but it is the terrorist threat presented I: the Matricula Consular t at is most worrisome.. Federal officia s ave discovered PAP, f1f in ivi ua s from many i erent countries in possession of the Matricula Consular card. Most of these individuals are citizens of other Central or South American countries. However, at least one individual of Middle Eastern descent has also been arrested in ossession o e atricula Consular card. The ability o foreign nationals to use the a ricu a onsu ar to create a well -documented, but fictitious, identity in the United States provides an opportunity for terrorists to move freely within the United States without triggering name -based watch lists that are disseminated to local police officers. It also allows them to board planes without revealing their true identity. All of these threats are in addition to the transfer of terrorist funds, mentioned �r I t earlier. C` 1� In addition, it is important to note that the White House Homeland Security Council is Ilnn currently chairing an interagency working group that is developing recommendations on Federal policy for Federal acceptance of these cards as well as guidance to state d441 and local governmental agencies on acceptance. The interagency group is examining t; policy for acceptance of all consular identification cards. They are also specifically examining counterfeit and fraud concerns with the Mexican consular identification card that would impact its acceptance for identification purposes. The Department of Justice is an active participant in that group. � The events of 9/11 forever changed our world. As unpleasant as it may „b,✓�'� 9 P Y be, we must N face the realities of our current world as they relate to protecting the people of the United States. This requires continual vigilance, pa icu arly when it comes to eing Me to detect and deter those who might abuse the system to directly cause harm, or those who might aid and abet the financing of terrorist operations. Thank you. 2003 Congressional Statement I FBI.,Home.._Pa.ge I http://www.fbi.gov/congress/congress03/mccrawO62603.htm 7/11/2003 Mexican ID card still accepted despite warnings from U.S. Page 1 of 12 FreeRepublic.com "A Conservative News Forum" [ Browse I Search I Topics ] Click to scroll to commentary. Mexican ID card still accepted despite warnings from U.S. Washington _Tim_es..A.I Thursday, July 3, 2003 1 By Audrey Hudson Posted on 07/02/2003 10:49 PM PDT by John_ Huang2 The Washington Times www wash.n. gtontimes,co..m... Mexican ID card still accepted despite warnings from U.S. By Audrey Hudson Published July 3, 2003 / - Federal government warnings that ion cards issued by Mexican officials are unreliable and a threat to national security have not swayed supporters nationwide including municipalities, police departments and banks, w o say they will continue to recognize them as legal credentials. "People need a way to prove who they are," said Elizabeth Davison, director of the Montgomery County Department of Housing and Community Affairs in Maryland. The Matricula Consular cards are now accepted by more than 400 cities and 900 police departments. Major banks, such as Bank of America, CitiBank, and Wells Fargo, also allow use of the cards to open accounts or conduct financial transactions. "I don't think Montgomery County is going to change their stand on accepting the cards and encouraging banks to accept it," said Sue Tucker, county spokeswoman. "Montgomery County still feels very strongly this is a good form of ID." Mexican birth certificates are required to obtain the $29 cards, but an FBI official said such certificates are "easy to forge,' and a "ma'or item on the product list of fraudulent document trade currently flourishing across the country anaroun the wor d." http://209.157.64.200/focus/f-news/939682/posts 7/31/2003 Mexican ID card still accepted despite warnings from U.S. Page 2 of 12 % "The Department of Justice and the FBI have concluded that the Matricula Consular is not a reliable form of identification due to the non-existence of any means of verifying the true identity of the card holder," Steven McCraw, assistant director of the FBI's office of intelligence, said last week in testimony before the House Judiciary subcommittee on immigration and border security. Rep. Tom Tancredo, Colorado Republican and chairman of the Congressional Immigration Reform Caucus, yesterday asked Secretary of Homeland Security Tom Ridge to denounce publicly the recognition of the ID cards. "Given the lack of coherent policy in this issue and the ongoing security threat acceptance of these cards poses, your leadership on this matter is urgently needed," Mr. Tancredo wrote in a letter to Mr. Ridge. Opponents of the cards say they essentially give illegal immigrants the ability to live in the United States as legal aliens, undermine efforts to control immigration and threaten secu ' Supporters say the IDs protect illegal immigrants by allowing them to report crimes to police without being deported. Asked if the congressional testimony would prompt any reconsideration of accepting the cards, a spokeswoman for Indianapolis Mayor Bart Peterson said "No, it wouldn't." The population of Mexicans in Indianapolis has grown to more than 50,000, activists say. Indianapolis voted last week with East Chicago, Ind., and Fort Wayne, Ind., to recognize the cards as valid forms of identification. "We understand there are many opinions about the card, but we feel it is safe and secure, and we've received many assurances from the Mexican Consulate in Indianapolis that they are," said Mr. Peterson's spokeswoman, Jo Lynn Garing. "We believe it will help public safety personnel in assisting victims of crime and at the scenes of accidents or fires," she said. The opinion of Sen. Richard G. Lugar, Indiana Republican and chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee was also requested, andhe supports the cards, she said. Miss Davison attended the hearing but said she was not persuaded the county should http://209.157.64.200/focus/f-news/93 9682/posts 7/31 /2003 Mexican ID card still accepted despite warnings from U.S. Page 3. of 12 reject the cards, which she said could benefit more than 10,000 residents. "I suppose it's possible the cards could be forged, but people also forge Social Security cards and passports. I don't see where there is a concern for this card over any other," she said. . Financial institutions also remain committed to recognizing the cards. Asked about the congressional testimony, Citibank issued a statement that "experts from different areas of our organization examined the cards and the issuing process, and we are comfortable that the card is a reliable means of identification." "We also require secondary forms of ID to make sure we know our customers. As a normal course of business, we will continue to monitor any additional information that comes to light concerning the reliability of the cards for identification purposes," the statement said. A spokeswoman for Wells Fargo said the cards meet all of their requirements as a valid and primary form of identification and they plan to continue to accept them for new account openings. "Wells Fargo has not experienced any issues with the new accounts that have been established," said spokeswoman Miriam Galicia Duarte. "Our experience with the accounts opened has been no different than that for accounts opened with U.S. driver's licenses or state identification," she said. C. Stewart Verdery, Homeland Security assistant secretary, said officials believe multiple cards can be obtained under numerous names, "an occurrence that poses a significant security issue and impacts their reliability as valid forms of identification." At least one person from the Middle East has been arrested with the Mexican identi ication card: which "provides an opportunity for terrorists to move�y within the United States without triggering name -based watch lists," Mr. McCraw said. "It allows them to board planes without revealing their true identity," Mr. McCraw said. Copyright © 2003 News World Communications, Inc. All rights reserved. http://209.157.64.200/focus/f-news/939682/posts 7/31/2003 The Mexican Matricula Consular Should Not Be Accepted for Official Purposes Page 1 of 3 1666 Connecticut Ave. #400 issue Brief Washington, DC 20009Yoke: (202) 328-7004 Fax: (202) 387 3447 Email: info@falrus..org Web. www.fairus.org The Mexican Matricula Consular Should Not Be Accepted for Official Purposes The recent push by Mexican consulates in the United States for the acceptance of consulate -issued identification cards used by Mexican nationals living in the U.S. poses serious legal and national security issues. The cards have drawn heated criticism because they are issued to illegal aliens who cannot access U.S.-issued identity documents. Because consular ID cards are only needed by people who aren't lei?ally in the U.S. in the first place, communities and businesses that accept the cards as vapid -fie undermining immigration enforcement and comnromisin U.S. security. The FBI and the Department of Justice say that the cards are not a reliable form of identification and pose "major criminal threats" and a "potential terrorist threat."' The Mexican government has successfully lobbied many state and local governments and businesses, and most recently a federal government building in California, to accept the IDs for establishing identity, opening bank accounts, various social service uses, check cashing, and airline travel. (The enormous population of illegal aliens, currently estimated by the Census Bureau to be about nine million, with perhaps four million of them from Mexico, is seen by banks as a potentially lucrative client base, for the handling charges on the money they are sending out of the country.) Aiding Illegal Immigration There's no way around the fact that consular ID cards are only needed by people who aren't legally in the U.S. in the first place. Indeed, relying on the Mexican matricula for identification is tantamount to admitting that the bearer is in the U.S. illegally, as no one here legally has a need for one. Every non -citizen other than an illegal alien will possess identity documents issued by the U.S. government (such as a valid visa). Businesses and communities that accept these IDs as valid are turning a blind eye to illegal immigration and gutting immigration law enforcement. http://www.fair-us.org/html/04193072.htm 7/11 /2003 The Mexican Matricula Consular Should Not Be Accepted for Official Purposes Page 2 of 3 National Security Risks Aside from aiding and abetting illegal immigration, acceptance of the consular ID cards is placing critical national security matters in the hands of the foreign governments that issue these cards. Indeed, easy access to banking and financial institutions was one of the critical weaknesses in our system 11 Changes since 9/11 have been implemented to make it more difficult for people who aren't supposed to be here in the first place —illegal aliens and terrorists —to remain. By accepting these cards, businesses and state and local governments are working at odds with the federal government's critical homeland security efforts. Legal Liability The U.S. Constitution does not permit a local or state government to decide, based on the advice or esires o a oreign government, that its own concerns override the will and intent of Congress. In choosing to recognize the consular ID card, local governments are ra sing significan legal issues by exercising a form of their own foreign policy, which the Constitution reserves for the federal government under t e onstitution, and are in direct conflict with federal law. Furthermore, the presentation of a consular ID card by an individual who does not also possess and present a corresponding valid document issued by the U.S. government is prima facie evidence that the person is unlawfully present in the United States. Thus, an official who provides any benefit or service in such a case would be subject to criminal liability.2 Government and banking officials also would be unlawfully discriminating if they recognized identity documents issued by the Mexican government, but did not do so for similar documents issued by other governments. While Mexico pushes for the consular ID card's acceptance in the U.S., no major bank in Mexico lists the card among the identification documents they accept to open an account, and only ten of Mexico's 32 states and districts recognize the card for identification purposes. Dangerous Precedent Because of the growing acceptance of these documents, several other foreign governments —including Guatemala, Honduras, Poland, Peru, and El Salvador —are preparing to issue similar cards to their own citizens who are living here illegally.3 It is highly likely that many other governments will soon join them. The growing use of such cards will effectively take U.S. national security matters, identity verification, and other crucial issues out of the hands of the U.S. government and put it in the hands of foreign countries. http://www.fairus.org/html/04193072.htm 7/11/2003 ' The Mexican Matricula Consular Should Not Be Accepted for Official Purposes Page 3 of 3 1. Steven McCraw, FBI Office of Intelligence, testimony before the House Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Claims' overight hearing on The Federal Government's Response to Consular Identification Cards, June 26, 2003. 2. A state or local government official or employee who provides any benefit or service to such a presenter possesses the criminal intent (mens rea) necessary for a felony indictment under 8 U.S.C. 1324 (Immigration and Nationality Act §274). 3. Jerry Seper, "More Countries Issue ID Cards to Illegal Aliens in U.S.," Washington Times, January 29, 2003. Modred 6103 http://www.fairus.org/html/04193072.htm 7/11/2003 Matricula Consular Article Archive Page 1 of 7 More on Mexican Sham ID's ...also applies to similar bogus IDs issued by Guatemala, etc. External links may expire at any time Chicago Tribune (Free Registration) -- April 23, 2003 ...Last week, the Colorado legislature too steps toward banning the "consular matricula," a popular identity document that Mexican consulates have been issuing to help W documented_ workers- [See: Aiding. and abetting._illegals._is_a crone]. Mexican officials fear that such anti -immigration measures could be fueled by anger at Mexico for its war stance. -- "Those who are against Mexico and immigration are using that argument now, but it's just an excuse," said one M.ex canoftic al.. . Colorado Residents-- April 22, 2003 Action Update, on..* n Colorado HB _1.224/Sham _ID bill. Alert Documents critical Colorado House Bill 1224, aka The Secure and Verifiable Identity Documents Bill, which could be the FIRST bill in the nation to stop a state's acceptance of sham ID cards, is back on track... We Get E-Mail -- April 22, 2003 1 Sham IDs Kern County, Calif Sheriff rejects bogus Mexican ID cards From the Kern Co. Sheriff s Office: Thank you for your interest and concern with the issue of the Mexican national identification card known as the "matricula consular." -- After much discussion and further review, the Kern County Sheriff s Department will not be accepting these identification cards in Kern County. Rep. Elton Gallegly - Washington Times -- April 22, 2003 Perilous .._ide.n., tity-loo.ph_ol...es. ...The only people who need forei n-issued identification cards known as matricula consulars are those illegally in the United States: criminals and terrorists. -- There is no requirement that the person who receives the card is in the United States legally. In fact, it is almost exclusively illegal immigrants who obtain the cards. We have no control over the veracity of the screening process or the document's integrity. Counterfeit matricula consulars are being sold -on California streets. . April21, 2003 ____1 Treasury Dept .pU...tting.corporate profit ahead „of..public good., on matricula debate PrOjeCt USA .,.,Are we to allow America to become a country in which vast communities of foreign Update nationals reside amongst us without our consent and against our laws, yet are still able to access our public services and financial institutions on the strength of foreign -issued ID cards? --And-- Americans should be outraged by the growing acceptance of the matricula ular card. • / Sham IDs Birmingham News -- April 21, 2003 The head of the Alabama Latin American Associatio aid his group I -ro step up its efforts to encourage banks to offer more services to the s ens -air �ke...d. Hispanic population. --- ...Birmingham -based Bank of Alabama is one of the few banks in Alabama that accepts the matricula consular... [Also see: Aiding,,_abettng._l..l..ega...ls.] . http://www.americanpatrol.org/REFERENCE/SHAM-ID/030418-ShamIDs.html 7/11/2003 Matricula Consular Article Archive Page 2 of 7 Rocky Mountain News -- April 19, 2003 i The Colorado House split right down t middle Friday, voting 32-32 on a bill that seek to place restrictions on Mexican iqentification cards as a way of monitoring possible terrorists. -- The measure, Ho Bill 1224, is now in limbo. While a tie vote means the bill will die, its sponsor, . Don Lee, R-Littleton, reserved the right to revive it next week... e Victorville (California)ily Press -- April 18, 2003 Shain IDs The San Bernardino C-67' " r ot—' r ocnize Mexican- issued identification cards, despite Victorville City Council's unanimous endorsement of the cards earlier this week, officials said Thursday [an irresponsible and dangerous move]. -- " - "Governments and banks supporting these cards is making us even more of a welcome mat to illegal aliens," said Barbara Coe, chairwoman of CC1R. [Sheriffs Fax: 909- 387- 3688 --Thank him] • Detroit Free Press -- April 18, 2003 Shane IDs Homeland Insecurity• Irresponsible county board OK's bogus IDs Wayne County has joined severa of er commun m-? ro` unit the state in passmg resolutions to accept Mexican Consular Identification cards to conduct official business. -- By a vote of 11-1, the Wayne County Commission passed a resolution Thursday that - = acknowledges the [sham] cards as a valid form of identification for Mexican nationals living and working in the county [illegals are prohibited from working in the U.S.]. e San Bernardino County Sun -- April 18, 2003 CShietinrgif�on'taue_ _..__.tconsul gets asuico nit-onertys, thean Bernardino County Sheriffs Department is holding off on its acceptance of the Mexican consular identification card... -- Recent is a statements by a high-ranking immigration official and a decision by the U.S. Justice Department not to accept the card have influenced Sheriff Gary Penrod's decision to wait for clarification from the federal government before accepting the card as a valid form of identification. [Also note outrageous remarks by the confused Redlands. top_cop.] [Sheriffs Fax: 909- 387-3688 -- Thank him] • Associated Press --April 18, 2003 Nevada Senate passes bill.._ allowing acceptance of farcical Mexican...IN The Nevada Senate on Thursday unanimously passed a measure allowing state agencies ' and local governments to accept consular identification cards as proof of identity. -- The bill permits but doesn't require cities, counties and the state itself to consider the IDs - commonly issued by Mexico's consulate - as equivalent to a driver's license. . Press Release -LEAC/FAIR - April 18, 2003 Shani IDs Immigration law officers say sham ID acceptance dan erous San Diego - Active duty and retired immigration aw enforcement officers say the .: growing acceptance of the Mexican government's matricula consular card as a form of 3: official identification puts the nation at risk. FAIR's Law Enforcement Advisory Council (LEAC), a group of former INS agents, Border Patrol officers, and other law enforcement experts with expertise in the immigration enforcement practices... Colorado and Mexican Sham IDs -- April 17, 2003 http://www.americanpatrol.org/REFERENCE/SHAM-ID/030418-ShamIDs.html 7/11/2003 Matricula Consular Article Archive Page 3 of 7 Colorado's HB03-1224 unacceptable as amended HB03-1224 [to get a copy of this bill click here and enter: 12241 has passed thew ate Action withendments in Colorado and will go to Governor Owens for approval or v ..These amendments make acceptance of the Mexican Matricula Consular card Alert cceptable and undermines the entire reason for having a "Secure & Verifiable Identity / Documents". Governor Owens needs .to_be contacted to veto 1224.with _these amendments. I Also see_ information from CAIR. Redlands (Calif.) Daily Facts -- April 17, 2003 Redlands._ cops_._ accept sh_am.._IDs.. ,m_eddling Mexicans. #hr thrilled. ...According to a Mex. ca i Cons...u..late press release, [Redlands].. Police_ Chief Jun. Bueerma m expressed in a letter to the consulate "his confidence in the foundation of *r = cooperative relationships between the Consulate of Mexico and the [RPD] in order to promote safer communities." -- "We are very grateful that the [RPD] relies on the quality that we use in order to issue the consular ID cards," said the Mexican consul. e April 17, 2003 FAIR Border Patrol says matricula useless as valid ID but...... 1;ie Mexican matncu a consuad c`ardIs a woHt !Zss form o� identification that is being News i used b crnnma s to ide their true identities, ays John D. Marlborough, a U.S. Border Release Patrol official in Southern Ca i ornmaecent letter to the San Bernardino County Sheriff. -- The letter, urging the Sheriff not to accept the matricula card as a valid form of identification... . Bakersfield Californian (Free Registration) -- April 17, 2003 Kern Co Sheriff looks into Mickey Mouse ..Mexican.ID The Kern County Sheriffs Department might be next on the list of law enforcement agencies to accept the Mexican national identification card known as the "matricula consular." -- "I'm definitely working on that," said Kern County Sheriff Mack Wimbish.... Mexican-gov__ernment._ officials are hoping that law enforcement agencies throughout the state will accept the card as a valid form of identification. [1-m,ail .,the..... sh.eri.ff] . Sham IDs Fort Collins Coloradoan —April 17, 2003 Colorado bill to restrict_ sham ID._acceptance._.paas-o 1 t0..1 -. The Senate approved on a 25-10 vote House Bill 1224, a measure that would restrict the -i; use of ID cards issued by embassies and consulates, including matricula consular cards.. San Bernardino County Sun -- April 16, 2003 Colton PD kowtows to corrupt Mexican gov't on bogus IDs The Mexican matricula consular is now accepted as a valid form of identification by the b Colton Police Department. -- Acting Colton Police Chief Joseph McCann informed officials at the McNican..... Consulate. in San Bernardino of the decision on Monday. -- Colton joins the cities of San_l3erna. rdino., Redlands, Fontana and Chino in recognizing the document. . Victorville Daily Press -- April 16, 2003 Victorville endorses laughable... bum _Mexican IDs During a visit by Mexico's _jmeddlesome] regional consul, the city joined dozens of California governments and businesses Tuesday by endorsing an identification card for Shan .IDs Mexicans living in the U.S. -- The card, called a matricula consular, is designed to help http://www.americanpatrol.org/REFERENCE/SHAM-ID/030418-ShamIDs.html 7/11 /2003 Matricula Consular Article Archive Page 4 of 7 residents [read: criminalinvaders] who have no government -recognized identification, said the Mexican consul serving San Bernardino and Riverside counties. . Port Huron, Michigan Times -Herald -- April 15, 2003 Port Huron rejects acceptance of farcical Mexican IDs The council rejected 3-3 accepting as valid identification the Mexican government's matricula consular. The card is issued to Mexican nationals living abroad. Opponents said the card was a way illegal immigrants could get government services or allow terrorists m t e country. • Chicago Tribune (Free Registration) — Posted April 14, 2003 / Sham IDs Hundreds stand in line hours to get sham. McYican__IDs v Grand Rapids, Michigan -- Hundreds of Mexican Citizens waited in line Saturday in Grand Rapids for a chance to get a Mexican Consulate I.D. card. -- It's not a Green Card, it only proves someone is a Mexican citizen. Legal and illegal immigrants carry them. -- One criticism is that the cards legitimize illegal aliens. . WorldNetDaily. com -- April 14, 2003 iJV\. ,ll4AAS 11i1v7G111J A Alvin 1_�i V_l_v _ai_n riv{ice as _._. �_!Y�S ...___._.__.._..._. Emulating Mexico's controversial "matricula consular" card at least five nations area instituting or considering instituting new identification cards r their c' ' r�s�i mmg the a United States including those visiting illegally. -- An increasing number of state and local governments are making it much harder for authorities looking for verifiable IDs. Salt Lake Tribune -- April 11, 2003 Consul to Visit Utah to Provide Guatemalans With Services em The Guatemalan _consul ._from ._..L..os._Angeles.. will be in Salt Lake City on Saturday and Sunday to provide passports, consular identification cards and other services to Utah's am I Guatemalan community. -- The purpose of the visit, said Aurelio Ruelas of King Express, is to provide Utah's Guatemalans who lack identification documents [i.e. invaders] with a consular ID. . Posted April 10, 2003 Bank _of A1.111 merica wooing _Mexican illegals. We Get Thought y'all might find this amusing. Picked it up today at the Bank of America on 4th. E Mail Ave. in Yuma, AZ. Notice (I circled near the bottom) where they remind anyone who may not know that they can get their sham IDs at the local. MexicanConsul. I think maybe other fans of your website would appreciate this. -- Your Big Yuma Fan Posted Apri110, 2003 We Get Wimpy .._Mayor_of _Casa_Grande,._Arizona_.and._Sham._ IDs When I read the report concerning the acceptance and approval. of the.Sham _l.D in Casa E-Mail G.rande,._A.rizona I was furious. I graduated from the high school in 1987 and see that politics in CG have not changed. Apparently common sense is not allowed there. - New California Media — Posted April 9, 2003 BOgu.sMexican IDs.._Adv...ance._in.. California. Sham .IDs Two new bills making their way through California's legislature would require all state http://www.americanpatrol.org/REFERENCE/SHAM-ID/030418-ShamIDs.html 7/11/2003 Matricula Consular Article Archive Page 7 of 7 em with their goy,,c= ent — This weekend, their consulate came to them. -- Staff members - set up shoj: "ai the San Rafael parish Catholic Church here yesterday to help their copnfrymen with their paperwork. Around 300 turned out, amongthem Julian [an illegal am I ien driving on a bogus Mexican license] who sought an official identification card. • e ress- nterprise (Free Registration) -- March 29, 2003 Homelan_d._I-nsecuritv:_Acce.ptance..of rinky-din_k_IN wides read In a time of heightened security, Inland authorities report a growing acceptance of -- and increased demand for -- Mexican consular identification cards. -- Redlands and Fontana police departments officially began accepting the ID this week. The card already is accepted at some local banks, the city of San Bernardino, and by some other public agencies in Southern California. • . Click here for more archived articles . Newest Articles on Sham Mexican .IDs _....................................__................._..................__..........._......................_....... _ . Search our site or the web for other articles on these ludicrous sham IDs. [Recommended search terms: "matricula" or "matricula consular"] . Back., Videos Features . Home-------- 1 0 http://www.americanpatrol.org/REFERENCE/SHAM-ID/030418-ShamIDs.html 7/11 /2003 Mexico's ID card gains more acceptance in states. cities - The Washington Times: Nation/'.... Page I of 5 A1t1t 04 Advertise Subscription Site Map ., n r Page Nation/Politics ....... _... ....... ..... ...__.._—.....—_.� -Pruden on, Politics _ Inside the Belt,:Nay - _.Inside Politics -Inside the Ring ...... .......... -............. _..... _._.._......... - ._...._ -Federal Report i -Around the Nation j -Daybook - -_--- -Steiner Cartoon World Commentary Editorials/Op-Ed Metropolitan Sports Business Technology Entertainment Books Food Wash. Weekend Travel Family Times Culture, etc. Civil War_ Weather Classifieds { I Home Guide Auto Weekend i i Emolovment Health Services Directory Market Place Mexico's ID card gains more acceptance in states, cities 3y Audrey Hudson THE WASHI,NGTON TIMES The Mexican government is convincing hundreds of local government and police departments across the United States to accept its identification cards used by legal and illegal aliens, which critics say amounts to a backdoor amnesty for illegal aliens. The cards are accepted by more than 800 police departments in 13 states, according to Miguel Manterrubio, spokesman for the Mexican Embassy in Washington. Published reports indicate more than 400 cities now consider the Matricula Consular cards proper identification, including Montgomery County, which began recognizing them last month..____.-__ Acceptance of the cards means police, cities and private companies typically responsible for turning illegal residence, over to federal author�iJ_e__are_relenting._ supporters say the card allows immigrants to open bank accounts to keep money secure and helps prevent crime because the aliens are not afraid to seek police help. The Mexican Embassy denies its 47 consulate offices in the United States are lobbying or contacting cities and counties directly urging them to accept the Secretary of State Colin Powell Meets with Mexican Foreign Affairs Secretary -uis Sr:nest✓ Derbez at &7e State Departrnent in Vla-shingtor F~iGay, lure 13; 2003. C,ic< here ' ,,rtier image • Mexico's ID card gains more acceptance in states, cities • Clintons manacle to make a bundle • U.S. using quick, decisive tactics to quell Iraqi attacks • Democrats want open +n, ti? D 'iearings Church shuns gun - raffle donations • Spending on dads overtakes moms http://www.washtimes.com/national/20030613-114935-5557r.htm 7/31 /2003 Mexico's ID card gains more acceptance in states, cities - The Washington Times: Nation/1... Page 2 of 5 Tourist Guide Electroni Holiday Gift Guide "matricula," which means "to register" in Set to Resume Compute I , i !International Reports S P Spanish. Talks Educatioi "It's a process in which they share ' 9 Die As Fishing Health _... Archive information.... I would not say we contact p- Boat Capsizes Orf ---._..- Entertain �4bscr!�rion them," said 1%1r. Manterrubio. -. Czechs Vote to Join ' NEVVE1 Advertise "What the consulate does is share European Union Grote t : About TWT information. We explain why we consider it �• Democrats Cite Today`s 1 Contact Us a secure document, and if they share that -'G'�ti's i� Prescription Insight Magazine �L g g opinion it is a secure document they Plan °� Afghan Insurgent The World & I accept p t it as identification said Mr. Attacks Rise, U.S. — -- - National Weekly ManterrublQ __ _._-- _,- --- ----- Says ^• By. appealing to the local government CDC Issues Middle East Times level, the Mexican government is Diabetes Warning g L Tiempos del Mundo Segye Ilbo 'undermining' the federal government, for Children `One Prairie Dog Is which has jurisdiction over authorizing Segye Times USA identification cards of foreigners and is Blamed in Wisconsin Chongyohak Shinmun "absolutely �• unacceptable," said Rep. Tom Hatfield, McCoy Sekai Nippo I Tancredo, Colorado Republican and author Descendants Ink Wash. Golf Monthly I of federal legislation to end acceptance of ; � Truce the cards by banks. • Roddick TopsAgassi, Makes ` c "How many ... immigration systems are Queen's Final ., we running in this country for crying out ` loud?" said Mr. Tancredo. The Mexican Embassy did not follow • Human -to -human through on its offer to share the list of monkeypox test cities or states that officially accept the a• expected cards. However, a partial list compiled by Concord Coalition report on Medicare The Washington Times shows the cards �• Nine dead in are accepted by some cities and counties 0 Oregon boat mishap in New Mexico, Georgia, Texas California, ` Cyber students Illinois Florida an �Michi Washin t g meet first at _-__.._-g_on, Missouri, Nevada and South Carolina. graduation The cards are also accepted by more . Bush urges Flag Day observance than 70 banks including Bank of America, • UPI NewsTrack Bank One, and Citibank. TopNews c` - Colorado recently outlawed use of the Crickets cause crop card already approved by many cities devastation in West -' there, and legislation to restrict the card Czechs vote to join has been introduced in the Arizona and ' European Union Iowa state legislatures. The card has been rejected in New York, and critics of the k---card in Utah are also lobbying for legislation banning it. Critics of the card say it is intended to circumvent Congress, which since September 11 has been reluctant to grant amnesty to the estimated 9 million immigrants living in the United States. Half are Mexican. They also say the only people using these cards are illegal aliens, because legal immigrants already have valid ID such http://www.washtimes.com/national/200-'10613-114935-5557r.htm 7/3 1/2003 Mexico's ID card gains more acceptance in states, cities - The Washington Times: Nation/I... Page 3 of 5 as their green card or state -issued driver's license. Mr. Tancredo said Mexican consulates actively lobbied Colorado cities to approve the cards. "That is exactly what is going on and has been going on. They are not bashful about it," said Mr. Tancredo, who is sponsoring legislation to end acceptance of the cards by banks, Colorado state Sen. John Andrews, co-sponsor of the bill outlawing the card and Senate president, said state officials believe some lobbying pressure was coming directly from the government in Mexico - "I'm _- j outraged at lobbying activity by foreign diplomats of any kind from any country. That is absolutely an inappropriate role for them," said_Mr. Andrews Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies said the lobbying effort is "pretty sophisticated, comprehensive, and organized." "This is not just one guy in charge, this is run from Mexico City as part of a concentrated, deliberate effort," said Mr. Krikorian. Dan McCrea, South Miami city commissioner, agrees cities are not the proper authority and opposed the card that did not win commission approval in June. "We're a local government and it's quite beyond our bailiwick," Mr. McCrea said. The South Miami City Commission, Mr. McCrea said, was "certainly lobbied" by the consulate in Florida. A spokeswoman for Montgomery County, however, said they were not lobbied.and took the initiative upon themselves to approve the cards for valid proof of identify and residence. Spokeswoman Sue Tucker said the county viewed it as their role to also encourage other Latin American countries to issue the cards to citizens living in the United States. Montgomery County also accepts Guatemalan identity cards. Nicaragua, Honduras, Poland, Peru, and El Salvador are now looking to issue cards in the United States for their citizens. In addition to proof of residence, local governments have accepted the identification to apply for library cards, marriage licenses, and some social services. Mr. Andrews said Denver may continue dispensing city services including welfare to card holders. "Denver may defy the new law and essentially dare the state to sue them, but I very much hope that scofflaw approach does not win out," said Mr. Andrews. News reports indicate that Mexican nationals are flocking to apply for the cards at special events held by the consulate offices. The cards cost $29 and can be obtained with a birth certificate, photo ID and proof of residence such as a phone bill. The Fort Worth Star -Telegram said hundreds of people began to http://www.washtimes.com/national/200'-)'0613-114935-5557r.htm 7/3 1/2003 Mexico's ID card gains more acceptance in states, cities - The Washington Times: Nation/)... Page 4 of 5 arrive at 4 a.m. June 11 to receive the cards at an event at the Rose Marine Theater. About 500 were processed that day and the consulate scheduled another processing day for June 26. Migrants in Miami -Dade County started lining up at 2 a.m. on May 30 and 1,000 cards were issued. That's about half of what Mexican officials expected to issue, down from 2,000 during an event last year. A mobile consulate unit moved through the state of North Carolina in May issuing the cards at stops in Hilton Head, Greenville, Columbia, and Charlotte. Mexico has opened new consulate offices in the last year in Indianapolis, Kansas City, Mo., and Las Vegas. Opponents of a new office in Raleigh, N.C., protested that office on September 11, 2002, saying its sole existence was to issue the Matricula Consular cards. Dan Stein, executive director of the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), called the card a "document designed to hell _people break the law." "They're trying to get through the back door what they can't get through the front door, and that's de facto amnesty," Mr. Stein said. The Mexican government was openly lobbying local governments that have "knuckled under" pressure until recently, said Craig Nelson, executive director of Friends of Immigration Law Enforcement. "There are a growing number of cities putting this on hold until further study. The headlong rush we saw a year ago is gone," Mr. Nelson said. Commissioners in Kalamazoo, Mich., voted unanimously June 2 to delay action on approving the cards, according to the Western Herald, which said "the city was petitioned to accept the cards by the Mexican Consulate of Detroit." Back to National/ Politics a, _ All site contents copyright © 2003 News World Communications, Inc. http://www.washtimes.com/national/20030613-114935-5557r.htm 7/31/2003 V ► FILE opposes the matricula consular Pagel of 3 Matricula Consular Current Horne I About FILE I D?pattn•�ents I Support FILE I Apply to join I Contact I Get Leaai Haig activities Matricula The matricula consular is an identification card issued by the Consular: the Mexican government to its citizens illegally residing in the United illegal alien ID ca rd States. We oppose acceptance of this card by U.S. institutions because it encourages illegal immigration. Furthermore, the Y.a...s..e.r._E.sam....._Ha.m.d..j United States has certain duties to its citizens —like ensuring and__u.S. national security an defending against international and domestic citizenship Traud—that require the responsibility for identification of persons in F...I.LE.'s.._secure ,ID -fFie Onited States to remain with U.S. authorities. These bui introduced._ into responsibilities must not be ceded to any foreign government sta...te._le.gsl.a..tures Sa.nct.uary_p.o..licies. FILE's efforts on the matricula consular are currently targeted toward banks that accept the card as sufficient ID to open a bank In -state tuition account, and toward municipalities that accept the card for the purpose of doling out city services —including law enforcement services. .................... ........................, Find> powered by EmeFind Also, see our efforts in this area in the states. RESEAR Legal bri Why Acceptant Foreign issued I cards in t United Sta Raises Ser Legal Objectio Mica h__Ki Jun 15, 2 Sample le to publi officials Sample le to U.S. ba FBI testim to Congressi subcommi Steve McC June 25,_2 MALDE attack on Cgng..Lu Gutierre FILE respo to MALD Micah Ki May 27, 2 FILE lette complaint U.S. Treas Dept Jaso..n,. Wy May., 29,. 2 FILE lette Bush Administra ]u. n..e.10, 2 IN for Illegals The Watri Consula http://www.fileus.com/dept/id/matricula/ 7/ 11 /2003 Secure and verifiable ID legislation Page 1 of 1 Secure ID Legislation Current Horne I About FILE Department; 1 Support FILE I Apply to Join I L,ntact Get L F rG �� I Legal Help activities M...at.0cu..la Several states will introduce the FILE Secure and Verifiable ID RESEARC Consular: the legislation during the 2003 legislative session. The bill, with the FILE bill assistance of FILE and Numbers.USA, is introduced in the following text ca dal..a.lie.n_ID states: To initiate Yaser Esam Hamdi ......_........__..................................................... introductio and U.S. .................................. of the bill citize.n...ship Date State Status your state introduced contact: FILE's secure ID ..............................._........._....____. Craig bill.. [ntrodu.ced._into Passes House 34-25-1, killed in Senate Arizona. Jan 14 2003 Nelsen state._le islature...s 9 Committee Saictu...a..ry.._po.licies Colorado. Jan 29, 2003 Signed into law May 23, 2003 IDs for Illegals: The I..n.-sta.te..tutron Iowa Mar 06, 2003 Introduced in Senate (Mar 6) 'Matricula Consular Advances (Federal legislation was introduced in Congress on Jan 29, 2003) Mexico's Immigratio Agenda FILE encourages the introduction of the bill in other states. The bill Center fo clarifies the types of identification local government entities mayImmigratio YP 9 Studies accept for the disbursement of public services —including law powered by FreeFind enforcement services. It provides for the verifiability of PRESS identification by federal security agencies. ACCOUNT Legislator target FILE feels confident a large majority of Americans will find the bill Mexico ID to be simple common sense, and legislators will quickly see the Associate bill as politically popular. Press Jan_21, 2003 Learn more about our efforts in the battle against the matricula consular. OF INTERES Mexico's I card for aliens in U.S. prompts validity bi Washing to Times J.an.30, 2003 Friends of Immigration Law Enforcement copyright 2002, 2003 all rights reserved home about us departments supporters apply contact legal_h. e.lp http://www.fileus.com/dept/id/state_law/index.html 7/ 11 /2003 The N an matricula consular (illegal alien) ID card is now illegal' 4orado! - CAIR - Colorado Alliance for Immigration.... PE of 5 www.cairco.org/matricula/matricula.html CAIR Colorado Alliance for Immigration Reform The Mexican matricula consular (illegal alien) ID Home How you can help card is now illegal in Colorado! Support CAIR Contact CAIR .....---.._---- _ About CAIR In early October of 2002, Denver Mayor Articles "' r Wellington Webb, without debate and public Background_ ar comment, ordered various City and County Billboards departments to accept the Mexican matricula Economic costs :, ° a consular ID card as valid identification. Education Eneray,� 'x U.S. Congressman Tom Tancredo, an outspoken Ethics and justice " critic of illegal immigration, said, "The only FAQ people who benefit from having such an ID are Language those who have come illegally and have broken our laws." In a June 12, 2003 Legal letter- to Secretary Powe , e—state ... using their consular offices here as Letters lobbying agents to help undermine our immigration_ : ws is an ou_ trade and the Links State Department's apparent acquiescence in this endeavor is even more &L Matricula consular incredible... If you do not take steps to halt our cooperation and support of this Perspective practice, our country will see a virtual tidal wave of such cards issued to illegal Political issues alien by their embassies and consulates in the U.S." US CO Population _proj_ections / US CO Colorado Representative Don Lee and Senator John Andrews subsequently / Presentations introduced a bill that would make illegal the accepting of the Mexican matricula Press releases consular ID card and other "unsecured" IDs. Public opinion Quick facts The bill (HB-1224, the Colorado Secure and Verifiable Identity Reading Also see: Document Act) was amended by the Senate. CAIR opposed the httn•//-,xnxnu rairrn nra/matririiia/matriciila.html 7/31/2003 The 1V an matricula consular (illegal alien) ID card is now illegal' 4orado! - CAIR - Colorado Alliance for Immigration ... ` Pz ' of 5 Smart growth Terminology amendment in favor of the original wording - see CAIR's letter. VASER_Consultin . The bill subsequently iterated back through the House and a Background . _........ _— . _ 9 G Y 9 Toolkit Local initiatives House -Senate Conference Committee to develop final wording Legal which was signed into law. The Colorado Secure and Verifiable Identity Document Act Colorado Governor Owens signed the bill into law on May 22F 2003 Although CAIR preferred the original unamended version of the bill, this is a very significant step forward in reducing the number of unsecured IDs that are issued and accepted in Colorado. Colorado is the first state making illegal the accepting of sham, unsecured ID cards. HB-1224 seriously discourages the use of the Mexican Matricula Consular identification card, or any card issued by any other foreign government that is not "secure and verifiable" by the United States Government. This means that only identification authorized will be acceptable - Under HB-1224: government agencies ■ A non -secure and unverifiable identification card is not acceptable to use to receive a library card, have a city business license issued, demonstrate eligibility for state or local government services (such as a marriage license or automobile registration), or to obtain public housing or other services. A non -secure andsu_ny-erifi b e identification card is not acceptable for the granting of ubli ervices. The only exception to this is that the children orn in the United States may show a hospital identification tag, or similar hospital identification, prior to receiving their U.S. birth certificate. This is according to current interpretation of the U.S. Constitution that confers U.S. citizenship upon children born in the United States. httn://www.cairco.oriz/matricula/matricula.html 7/31 /2003 The Iv an matricula consular (illegal alien) ID card is now illegal 4orado! - CAIR - Colorado Alliance for Immigration ' N of 5 When person who presents a non -secure and unverifiable identification card to state or local law enforcement, as part of a routine traffic stop, or as part of an arrest, the arresting officer may use the information on the card as part of his or her investigation into the identity of the person. However, all information from the identification card must be recorded by the officer and retained for public inspection. If feasible, the person presenting the identification card shall also be finger printed. HB-1224 changes Colorado statutes, clarifying that when a person knowingly presents false documentation to a police officer (including a false Matricula Consular card, false Social Security Card, or false Immigration card), the presenter may be prosecuted for presenting false identification to law enforcement. Previously, the law required that the person presenting the card intended to commit fraud. HB-1224 removes the fraud standard from the statute, allowing people who present false identification to be prosecuted. ■ State and local police may also rely upon information recorded on a non - secure and unverifiable identification card when it is part of the identification discovered on a dead body. In essence, government employees who accept the Matricula Consular, or another from of non -secure and unverifiable identification, are risking the loss of their governmental immunity if they accept the card for any government services and will have direct liability from civil litigation. Law enforcement has been given some narrow exceptions to the governmental immunity provisions, but have been given an additional responsibility to collect information from people presenting non -secure and unverifiable ID's. The law also gives new tools to local prosecutors to bring people who present false identification to trial -- and provides new incentives for police officers to detain such individuals. We at Colorado Alliance for Immigration Reform (CAIR) wish to thank Colorado Representative Don Lee and Senator John Andrews for their dedicated efforts on the Colorado Secure and VerJfjable Identity Document Act, HB-1224. We are deeply concerned about Colorado's and our nation's future and it is evident that they - and Governor Owens - clearly shared this concern with passage of HB- 1224. We respect and appreciate their wisdom and vision in promoting this bill. httn://www.cairco.orL/matricula/matricula.htm] 7/31/2003 The N an matricula consular (illegal alien) ID card is now illegal ; 11orado! - CAIR - Colorado Alliance for Immigration.... ' P- ' of 5 We understand that the machinations of politics are never simple, and we applaud their concern about this issue and their leadership in enacting legislation as embodied in HB-1224. We appreciate their efforts to make this bill as effective as possible in its final form. Additional Information See our extensive background information for more in-depth information, what has been done, facts and talking points on these non -secure ID cards. H.R. 502 On January 30, 2003, Representative Tom Tancredo (R-CO) introduced H.R. 502 - national legislation requiring that identification used to obtain federal public benefits or services, including law enforcement services, meet restrictions ensuring that it is secure and verifiable. This bill would prohibit any federal agency, commission, or other entity within any branch of the federal government from accepting, recognizing, or relying on any identification document not issued by a federal or state authority or issued without verification by a federal law enforcement, intelligence, or homeland security agency. (See this article for more information). Video of matricula ID card debate On January 8 & 9, 2003, CAIR proudly cosponsored syndicated columnist and investigative journalist, Michelle Malkin in various appearances including a public debate and discussion: The Mexican "matricula consular" ID card: Safe or Sorry_?. EN CAIR produced a video of this lively, informative and very timely debate. We distributed the video to public access television stations across Colorado. This video is also particularly suitable to show to elected o i'c als in every state. If you would like httn://www.cairco.oru/matricula/matricula.html 7/31/2003 The Tv an matricula consular (illegal alien) ID card is now illegal! ilorado! - CAIR - Colorado Alliance for Immigration ...'Pe " of 6 a.professional quality format of this video for broadcast, please contact us. Toolkit for activists in other states We have been extremely successful in halting the efforts of the Mexican government to influence Colorado cities and municipalities. We have put together an activist toolkit for you to use. This toolkit explains what we I done and offers tips and techniques to achieve success. Matricula backk round o Activist toolkit o Home http://www.cairco.org/matricula/matricula.html 7/31/2003 The P ;an "matricula consular" ID card: Safe or Sorry? debate - C - Colorado Alliance for Immigration Reform _ . R ' of 4 www.cairco.org/present/event2003jan.html Home How you can help Support CAIR Contact_ CAIR About CAIR Articles Background Billboards Economic costs Education EneW Ethics and justice FAQ Language Legal Letters Links -a- Matricula consular Perspective Political issues us CO Population._.. projections us CO Presentations Press._ releases Public opinion Quick facts Reading r Colorado Alliance for. Immigration Reform The Mexican "matricula consular" I/card: Safe or Sorry? On January 8, 2003 CAIR and the MetropolitaZ a College of Denver (MSCD) Office of Student Activities put on a public dend discussionon the Mexican matricula consular ID card. Readis from the debate. EN CAIR edited and produced a�minute video tapevideo tape f this important, timely and provocative debate. We enco w the debate video to those in your area, including elected officials! You can order a video tape of the debate. The cost is $25, which covers the tape, shipping and handling. Send a check for $25 to: Mike McGarry VASER Consulting of Aspen PO Box 12008, Aspen, CO 81612 970-920-1200 Fax/phone Public debate and discussion: The Mexican "matricula consular" ID card: Safe or Sorry? httn-//www.caircn.org/nresent/event2003ian.html 7/31/2003 The I ,an "matricula consular" ID card: Safe or Sorry? debate - C - Colorado Alliance for Immigration Reform R ` of 4 Smart growth Terminology VASER Consulting_ Local initiatives Panelists included: Ann Allott: immigration._ attorney_, speaker, author. Richard D. Lamm: former three -term Gov. of Colorado; co-author, The Immigration Time Bomb; member, CAIR. Council of Advisors. Donna L. Lipinski: immigration attorney; currently serving on the Board of Governors nationally for the American Immigration Lawyers Association; spearheaded movement to provide immigration category for. Essential Workers and has served on its committee since its formation in 1997. Michelle Malkin: syndicated columnist and author of the best-selling book Invasion. See additional information about Michelle Malkin. Mike McGarry: CAIR co -director and spokesman; Colorado State Long -Term Care Ombudsman; currently writing a to -be -published research paper on the effects of mass immigration on senior citizens. David N. Simmons: practicing immigration attorney since 1986; Adjunct Professor of immigration law at the University of Denver, College of Law; past chapter chair of the Colorado Chapter of the American Immigration Lawyers Association; former honorary legal counsel to the Mexican Consulate General in Denver. Moderator: httn://www.cairco.orii/Dresentlevent2003ian.html 7/31/2003 The 1V" an "matricula consular" ID card: Safe or Sorry? debate - C, • Colorado Alliance for Immigration Reform 'Pa of 4 The debate moderator was Dr. Joel Edelstein: Professor Emeritus of Political Science, University of Colorado, Boulder; with extensive experience moderating forums and debates. Book signing Michelle Malkin signed copies of her book "Invasion" prior to and after the debate. See our press -release and articles about.. the. debate. Read excerpts from the debate. Order a video tape of the debate. Home httD://www.cairco.orLY/Dresent/event2003ian.html 7/31 /2003 The N an "matricula consular" ID card: Safe or Sorry? debate - C. - Colorado Alliance for Immigration Reform P, of'2 www.cairco.org/present/event2003jan—debate_quotes.html Home How you can help Support LAIR Co_n_tact. CAIR About CAIR Articles Background, Billboards Economic costs Education Energy Ethics and justice FAQ Language Legal Letters Links a Matricula consular Perspective Political issues us CO Population projections us CO Presentations Press_ releases Public opinion Quick facts Reading_ CAIR Colorado Alliance for Immigration Reform The Mexican "matricula consular" ID card: Safe or Sorry? On January 8, 2003 CAIR and the Metropolitan State College of Denver (MSCD) Office of Student Activities put on a pq.W.ic_d_ebate and discussion on the Mexican matricula consular ID card. Excerpts from the debate Michelle Malkin: But for me, and I think for most Americans, the issue of national security is paramount. We have to ask whether or not widespread acceptance of this card by many local and state and Federal level agencies as well as businesses in the private sector is a good t . the standpoint of national security, and I think the honest an a 's "He!! no!". David N. Simmons: I agree with Michelle: I am very concerned about national sec I am very concerned about unrepaired broken fences... We have almost half a century of failed immigration enforcement in this country. Our immigration policy is flawed and we need to quit talking about making it difficult and start talking about what we can do to move forward in the international world where Chicago by car is just as far away as Hong Kong by airplane in the 21st century. Dick Lamm: The same rights that we give to Mexico to issue their own ID card httn://www.cairco.oriz/Dresent/event2003ian debate auotes.html 7/31/2003 The M m "matricula consular" ID card: Safe or Sorry? debate - C1 Colorado Alliance for Immigration Reform 'Pa, 'of 2 Smart growth would have to be put out to Guatemala and Poland and Ireland and where else? Terminology And all of a sudden - think it through - you are going to have 25, 50, 120 VASER_Consulting countries all issuing their own national ID cards. If you accept one, there is no Local initiatives va i reason not to ot accept hers. And it seems to me you can't have that - as every house needs a door, every country needs a border. C Donna Upins ' aWe're all talking about this identification document as if it has some <ind of immigration significance. It doesn't. It's simply an ID document. What are we so afraid of? Why are we so xenophobic? Mike McGarry: This card is not what it is represented to be. There is absolute) no integrit in the"issuing process. It is a sham card issued on the s reng of faith, by agents of a corrupt government to their illegal aliens ' residing in our country. CAIR edited and produced a 57-minute video tape of this important, timely and provocative debate. We encourage you to show the debate video to those in your area, including elected officials! You can order a videotape of the debate. The cost is $25, which covers the tape, shipping and handling. Send a check for $25 to: Mike McGarry VASER Consulting of Aspen PO Box 12008, Aspen, CO 81612 970-920-1200 Fax/phone See our press. -release and articles_ about_ the debate. matricula consular card o Home Here are excerpts from a similar debate between Michelle Malkin and 0. Ricardo Pimentel, in the Phoenix area in late January. httn://www.cairco.org/nresent/event2003ian debate auotes.html 7/31/2003 Center for Immigration Studies Page 1 of 17 IDs for Illegals The 'Matricula Consular' Advances Mexico's Immigration Agenda January 2003 By Marti Dinerstein Download the .pdf version Read the panel discussion transcript In the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, a migration deal with Mexico was tabled while attention turned to homeland security. So the Mexican government abruptly changed its White House strategy and substituted a grass -roots approach that would focus at the local level, seek small successes, and build momentum for congressional action. The linchpin for this new strategy was to be the "matricula consular," an official identity card issued by the Mexican government, which it wanted to be officially recognized within the United States. This Backgrounder is the first detailed examination of the matricula issue. Among the findings: * The matricula consular is useful in the United States only for illegal aliens, since legal immigrants, by definition, have U.S. government -issued documents. * The Mexican government has launched an aggressive grassroots lobbying campaign to win acceptance for its matricula card from state and local jurisdictions and from banks, especially in areas where Mexican illegal aliens are concentrated. * The objective of this lobbying effort is to achieve quasi -legal status for Mexican egals m the Umted States without waiting for action from Washington. * The matricula itself, however, is useful to illegal aliens only insofar as U.S. institutions are willing to collaborate with Mexico's efforts to circumvent U.S. * While many jurisdictions have resisted pressure from the Mexican government, others have not; the matricula is now accepted by 800 local law enforcement agencies and 74 banks, as well as by 13 states for purposes of obtaining a driver's license. http://www.cis.org/articles/2003/back3O3.html 7/11 /2003 Center for Immigration Studies Page 2 of 17 * Not only does the matricla subvert U.S. im umigration law, it is not even a secure identity document. Mexico is not authenticating the documents used to obtain the 'matricu a against computerized data files in Mexico. * Safeguards are not in place to prevent multiple issuance of matriculas to the same individual; in fact, the INS has already reported finding multiple cards in different names issued to the same person. * The matricula is becoming a shield that hides criminal activity for two reasons: first, the holder's identity was not verified when the card was issued, and second, police in jurisdictions that accept the matricula are less likely to run background checks on card holders picked up for minor infractions. * The U.S. Treasury Department has given its approval to banks to accept the matricula for opening bank accounts. * The acceptance of Mexico's matricula consular sets a precedent, making it almost impossible to reject similar cards presented by illegal aliens from other countries, including those which have sent terrorists to the United States in the past. Early in September 2001, the Mexican government had every expectation that it would soon achieve its principal foreign policy goal — a comprehensive migration agreement with the United States that would create new guest worker programs, exempt Mexico from visa limits, and "regularize" the immigration status of the estimated three to five million Mexicans already living in the United States illegally. After 9/11, public and congressional opposition in the United States to an illegal -alien amnesty hardened and made such a deal impossible. In its place, Mexico sought piecemeal changes, centered on gaining acceptance in the United States for the "matricula consular." But Mexico's new approach has become a direct challenge to U.S. sovereignty — by aggressively lobbying state and local governments, Mexico is chansin America's de facto immigration policy in lieu of congressional action. And it has been doing so while the U.S. government watched — or even gave its tacit consent. Rebirth of the Matricula The issue of secure identification became a national concern in the United States after it was discovered that all 19 9/11 hijackers had valid or fake Social Security numbers and 18 of the 19 had authentic or pGony driver's licenses or motor vehicle ID cards. There was a public outcry and steps were taken to tighten the eligibility requirements for oth Social Security cards and driver's licenses. It has became common operating procedure for ID to be required in order to enter certain buildings, gain access to secure areas at airports, and attend high -profile public activities, like New Year's Eve in Times Square. Life became even more difficult for the undocumented, the majority of whom are Mexicans. Wanting to ensure that its nationals could illegally remain in the United States with as little hassle as possible, the Fox government turned its attention to providing them with Mexican identification that would be accepted by U.S. authorities. Simply providing passports was not a viable option. The United States requires Mexican citizens to obtain a visa before entering the country, a nicety ignored by people who cross http://www.cis.org/articles/2003/back3O3.html 7/11 /2003 Center for Immigration Studies Page 3 of 17 our borders without permission. Possession of a Mexican passport without a visa would only highlight their illegal status. Another option could have been Mexico's voter registration card, which is regarded as a secure identity document. It was revamped at great expense in the 1990s to stem endemic corruption in the Mexican electoral system. But that card, too, was a non -starter. It contains a fingerprint and, thus, would have been counter -productive to Mexico's aim of avoiding deportation of its citizens. Anyone caught crossing the border without permission is fingerprinted and penalties rise for repeat offenders. Knowing this, Mexican illegals often use fake identities, not wanting to have their legal name in INS arrest files. But if fingerprints match, a false identity doesn't cut it. Identity theft is a felony and subjects an offender to deportation. So the Mexican government turned to the matricula consular, a logical choice, since it was created in 1870 specifically to help Mexican citizens living abroad get help from their local consulate if needed. In its simplest form the matricula card is an official Mexican government document that certifies the name and age of the bearer. Well over one million matriculas were already in circulation in the United States before the September 2001 terrorist attacks. Even though those cards. contain no security features, they remain valid, according to a consulate official in New York.! In an audacious political maneuver, Mexico decided to to turn the matricula consular into a ve icle to achieve quasi -legal status for its undocumented population in the United States. _ Its strategy was two -pronged. First, it needed to convince U.S. authorities that the matricula was secure identification. Second, it planned an aggressive grassroots lobbying campaign to win acceptance for it at the local and state level, especially in areas where large numbers of Mexicans resided and were, in fact, members of the community. New matricula contains useful information and offers protection against counterfeiting. The new matricula card was first introduced in major metropolitan areas in March 2002 and gradually was made available in consulate areas throughout the United States. It is wallet -sized, making it easy to carry on a daily basis. It is generally valid for five years and is bargain -priced at $28. The card contains the name, date and place of birth, a current photograph, and the holder's signature. A new feature is inclusion of a U.S. address, which is information banks require and the police also want, even if someone is simply reporting a crime. A current address also is required to obtain local social services and access to community facilities. Another new addition is the telephone number of the local Mexican consulate office, which is provided for two reasons. First, it is a way that local officials can verify the card's authenticity. Second; it is a reminder to the police that a Mexican national in trouble has a right to call his or her consulate office for assistance. In designing the new card, Mexico put emphasis on features to prevent counterfeiting. Some of them are visible, like the patterned green security paper and an "advantage seal" that in natural light changes color from green to brown and is superimposed over the bearer's photograph. Other anti -forging features are visible only in florescent or infrared light and others require a high-tech decoder to be seen. "At one angle, the decoder reveals the bearer's name over the http://www.cis.org/articles/2003/back303.html 7/11/2003 Center for Immigration Studies Page 4 of 17 photograph. From other angles, the decoder reveals the bearer's birth date and the letters `SRE,' initials of the Secretaria de Relaciones Exteriores, the Mexican agency responsible for issuing the card."2 The Mexican government calls the new matricula card the "high security consular ID." This phrase is used in conjunction with descriptions of its anti -forgery technology. i The counterfeiting safeguards certainly add to the matricula's reliability, but they are not a substitute for other security measures, some of which Mexico has used to promote the \ matricula but has not yet delivered. Matricula not Secure Mexico is not authenticating breeder documents. For an identity card to be secure, the "breeder" documents prove ed must be authenticated to guard against identity fraud. Safeguards must also be in place to ensure that the goal of one person, one identity, one card is met. This issue is particularly complicated for the Mexican government, which is fully aware that its nationals commit document and identity fraud to remain in the United States. Previously, this issue was not of concern to them; but now, the Mexican government is warning its citizens against this practice.3 To guard against fraud, Mexico requires that applicants for the matricula appear in person to have their photograph taken and to submit identity documents and proof of residence in the geographic region served by the consulate issuing the card. An original or certified copy of a Mexican birth certificate is required. Another piece of photo identification, preferably from Mexico, is also required. Consular officials say .the documents they accept include a voter registration card, a military service card, or a valid passport. In the absence of a photo ID from Mexico, consular officials are granted discretion in deciding what U.S. documents to accept. Media reports have mentioned employer ID cards, motor vehicle department ID cards, and student ID cards. Concern has been expressed that the standards for issuing matriculas differ considerably from consulate to consulate. For the matricula card to be secure, these "breeder" documents must be authenticated. And Mexico has said it was doing so.4 However, local consulates do not, and probably cannot, verify the authenticity of these documents against computerized data files in Mexico. An official at the Mexican Embassy in Washington said that it relies on the expertise of the staff in the 47 consulates to visually authenticate the documents. The breeder documents presented by those applying for a matricula card are not electronically scanned. Instead, hard copies are made of the documents, which are kept in physical files at the appropriate consulate. So as a practical matter, the consulates have no computerized data to transmit, even if they were linked to databases in Mexico against which the matricula applicants' information could be checked. Issued on same -day basis, even in remote locations. Given the sheer volume of the matriculas being issued and the physical conditions under which this is accomplished, it is easy to understand why the process is not highly automated. The "new and improved" http://www.cis.org/articles/2003/back3O3.html 7/11 /2003 Center for Immigration Studies Page 5 of 17 matricula has been a runaway best seller with undocumented Mexicans living in the United States. On some days the demand exceeds the ability of the consular staffs to process all of the people waiting in long lines. This is particularly true when mobile offices are set up to accommodate people who live in rural areas distant from the nearest consulate office. These visits are publicized within the local Mexican community and word-of-mouth travels fast. The venues for the mobile consulates are not fancy, ranging from an adult education school in Brentwood, Calif., to a tent outside the Cardunal Savings Bank in Woodstock, Ill., to the El Rincon Vaquero trading post in West Columbia, S.C. All matriculas — even from these remote locations — are issued on a same -day basis. For a consulate to transmit personal information about matricula applicants on an on-line, real-time basis to a confidential database maintained in Mexico would (or should) require dedicated data lines and multiple layers of communications security. It would also require that the consulate receive back almost instantaneous confirmation of the validity of the applicant's documents. For that to happen, sophisticated, costly, and time-consuming interface programming would be needed, as well as investments in communications technology and support at each consulate. The price tag would easily be in the tens of millions of dollars. Those realities raise troubling questions and doubts about Mexico's candor when explaining the extent — and limits — of the matricula as a secure ID document. �A Safeguards not in place to prevent multiple issuance of matriculas to same individual. Mexico had to absorb a multi -million dollar start-up investment for new equipment and technology before its 47 consulates could issue the improved matricula. That investment was required for the redesign of the card, for digital cameras to photograph each matricula applicant on -site, for technology to prevent counterfeiting, and for the equipment that actually produces the cards. Concurrent with the issuance of each matricula, a digital file of the photograph, signature, and data elements is created. Such a file could be electronically transmitted to Mexico and matched against databases in all 47. consulates to ensure that no more than one card is issued to any individual. In its discussions with law enforcement, banking, and motor vehicle officials to gain acceptance for the matricula, Mexico has referenced this database as another security layer. There is one big problem, however. The network is not yet operational. Estimates of when it will be available range from several months to several years. Most U.S. officials seem to feel that Mexico is serious about providing it, if for no other reason than it needs it for its own purposes. The issue seems to be a matter of timing, not intent. But as the saying goes, timing is everything. Well over one million older matriculas, which have no security features and the data from which cannot be converted into electronic format, are still in circulation. The Mexican government announced it issued over one million matriculas in 2002. Thus, with estimates of Mexico's illegal population in the United States ranging from three to five million people, a significant percentage of that population possess matriculas that do not meet a generally accepted definition of secure identification. http://www.cis.org/articles/2003/back303.html 7/11 /2003 Center for Immigration Studies Page 6 of 17 The absence of a computer network linking the 47 consulates is a serious security flaw. Possessing multiple copies of a genuine photo ID document touted as having "high security" would provide excellent cover to a host of unsavory characters. Fraud is occurring. "One guy we arrested recently had three different matriculas with three different names. It was his picture, issued through the consulate," said an INS official in Denver. "Our one worry is that this gives someone whose intentions are bad one genuine piece of identification."5 Some Washington officials are quietly worried about graft within the 47 consulate offices. No country is immune from corrupt employees who sell identity documents for cash. But in Mexico corruption is endemic and is common throughout the government. Rumor has it that some employees simply pocket the $28 matricula fee, paid in cash with no audit trail. Others worry that low -paid consular staff might succumb to bribes and provide matriculas to OTMs (Other Than Mexicans) engaged in drug or human smuggling or terror financing activities. These employees would be covered by diplomatic immunity. A good reason to believe that the consular network will become a reality is that Mexico has its own reasons to prevent fraud in its issuance of the matricula. In the past, Mexico has had to guess how many of its citizens live in the United States. And it had no clue who they were or where they lived. Compiling an accurate registry of these names serves Mexico's economic, political, and foreign policy objectives. Mexicans Push Matricula Acceptance It's obvious why the matricula is so popular with Mexican illegals. It is transforming their quality of life in America. It sells itself. Mexican officials and illegal immigrant advocates repeat over and over like a mantra that the matricula does not confer legal status. They trivialize the benefits it confers, referencing library cards, video rentals, and utility services. Yet, in less than a year, the matricula has come a long way toward achieving what Mexico hoped it would — quasi -legal status for its undocumented population in areas where the matricula is widely accepted. In localities where it is accepted as valid identification, the matricula consular has reduced the chances that illegal Mexican aliens will be arrested and deported, given them entree to mainstream banking services, provided access to city and state services — and in 13 states gained them exactly the same driver's licenses as those carried by American citizens. (See sidebar.) http://www.cis.org/articles/2003/back303.html 7/11 /2003 Center for Immigration Studies Page 7 of 17 The matricula is just a laminated piece of paper. Its value derives from the fact that U.S. police departments, banks, local governments, and state motor vehicle bureaus voluntarily have agreed to accept it, no questions asked. This is due to the brilliant propaganda campaign, conceived by Mexico's foreign ministry and executed by its 47 consulate offices, the largest diplomatic presence in the United States. Their plan is to gain widespread acceptance for the card throughout the United States. This involves consulate personnel traveling from city to town within their geographic region, calling on the mayor, police chief, local bank officials, motor vehicle bureaus, state legislators, etc., and urging them to accept the matriucla as official identification. They speak at official meetings, court prominent community leaders, meet with the editorial boards of newspapers, and seize every opportunity given for media coverage. Each small success is celebrated and announced to the local media. A scorecard is maintained in Washington and disseminate to the local consu ate o fices. Thus, a "win" with a local police chief in California can be cited by the consulate office in Georgia as evidence of the growing momentum to accept the matricula throughout the United States. The results of this lobbying effort have been impressive. On December 30, the Mexican Foreign Ministry announced that in 2002 it had issued 1,040,934 matricula consulars to Mexicans in the United States. Approximately 64 percent were issued by 10 Mexican consulate offices in three border states —. Arizona, California, and Texas — and in Chicago, http://www.cis.org/articles/2003/ba.ck303.html 7/11/2003 Center for Immigration Studies Page 8 of 17 which has the second largest Mexican population after Los Angeles. To date, 74 banks accept the matricula as identification to open accounts. According to the Mexican government, the matricula also is accepted as official ID by more than 800 U.S. police departments and by 13 states to obtain a driver's license.6 Matricula Shields Criminals At one level, it is hard to understand why 800 police forces would accept the matricula as acceptable ID, but it has a certain logic. In selling the matricula to the police, Mexican officials emphasize its security features, public safety, and human dignity. They make the point that illegal Mexican aliens in the community would be more likely to report crimes to the police if they did not fear doing so could lead to their deportation. These arguments resonate with local police, whose principal job is to protect their community. The police department in Austin, Texas, was among the first to accept the matricula.? It did so because its own records indicated that Mexicans assumed to be illegal were subject to a disproportionately high level of crime, particularly robberies. Matricula reduces risk of arrest, jail, and deportation. Police need to see identification even for minor infractions. If an individual has none, he or she must be taken to a police station and booked. It is a time-consuming process and causes ill will within the community when, arguably, the offense is not a serious one. Immigrant advocates shrilly remind the media that local police are not responsible for enforcing federal immigration law. And some local police agree with this assertion. The assistant chief of police in Austin "acknowledged that some citizens have criticized the authorities' acceptance of the card. However, he noted, enforcing immigration law is a federal responsibility.$ But for the police to ignore federal immigration law is tantamount to subverting it. And that is exactly what has been happening since the Mexican government launched its full -court press to get local law enforcement officials to accept the matricula on a pari passu basis with U.S.-issued identification or valid passports. In some localities, an illegal Mexican alien in possession of a matricula is being cited and released. Without a matricula, he or she would be taken to a police station, fingerprinted, and a background check run. Police would examine any papers in the suspect's possession to determine the person's identity. If their search gave them reason to believe the person was in possession of fraudulent documents, he or she would be charged with that crime, as well as the one that had brought them to the attention of the police in the first place. The individual's name and fingerprints would be run through criminal databases, which now include the INS list of over 300,000 aliens who absconded after being served with deportation notices. A large number of them are from Mexico. While local police do not routinely notify the INS when an illegal alien is arrested, they apparently do so if a serious crime has been committed. Thus, they seem to be comfortable selectively enforcing federal immigration law.9. But in an increasing number of U.S. cities, towns, and villages, none of these activities are taking place. For any Mexican citizen who possesses one, and particularly for those here illegally, the matricula has become a shield that hides past or current criminal activity. http://www.cis.org/articles/2003/back3O3.html 7/11/2003 Center for Immigration Studies Page 9 of 17 Matricula available to hard-core criminals, no questions asked. Given the free pass that local police are giving to matricula holders, it is a certainty that criminals, irrespective of their legal status, are in line when the consulate mobile offices arrive in their localities. Why not? The only requirement to receive the matricula is Mexican citizenship. No criminal background checks are run. It is an identity document, nothing else. But local law enforcement officials in the U.S., trying to cope with an influx of illegal Mexican aliens into their communities, have turned it into a sort of protection badge. Criminality is rampant in Mexico and, inevitably, crosses our porous border. This is particularly true with drug smugglers. It is an unfortunate fact of life that illegal drugs are grown and manufactured in Mexico, trafficked by Mexicans, but used by Americans. Within the last decade, Mexican drug traffickers have become major wholesalers throughout the United States of marijuana, heroin, cocaine, methamphetamine, and ecstasy. Their distribution hubs are expanding away from just border communities. According to a Drug Enforcement Administration official, "The southwest border isn't along the Rio Grande anymore. It's in Atlanta and North Carolina and Chicago and even Yonkers and New Rochelle."10 They like to work close to towns that provide easy highway access to big cities and where poor immigrant residents can be recruited as couriers. These "towns offer the cover of hard- working immigrants and a pool of potential recruits among the out of luck and unemployed. ... From bases on the West Coast, Mexican traffickers have moved across the Northwest and Midwest, hiding among fruit pickers in Washington, resort workers in Colorado, and construction workers in Minnesota .... The Mexican traffickers are notably low profile, and police officers say the immigrant workers on whom they prey are similarly discreet."11. The vast majority of illegal Mexican aliens are not perceived to be "criminals," although they commit criminal acts like crossing our border without permission, engaging in identity theft, and using fake, stolen, or borrowed Social Security numbers to find work. While Americans who commit those crimes would be arrested and prosecuted, there is great reluctance to do so in communities with large illegal populations because it could result in their deportation. The matricula is compounding this problem and giving both illegals and local law enforcement a way to ignore this troubling reality. Mexico Lobbies Banks Some Mexican illegals view a banking relationship as the most important tangible value of the matricula consular. For those who work off the books, it provides peace of mind to know they no longer are easy marks for thieves who prey on people who fear going to the police. For others, it makes cashing paychecks easier. Not only does it reduce the cost of sending money to their homes in Mexico, it provides these families with an ATM card, so they can withdraw only enough cash to meet their needs and keep the rest secure in a bank. At first blush it seems almost impossible to believe that some of the largest and most prestigious banks in the country are knowingly offering accounts to Mexican illegal aliens. The reasons are complicated and encompass outreach to assist a minority community, perceived profits to be made from accessing a fast-growing new market, and even a way to increase the dollars remitted to Mexico, in the expectation that some will be allocated to http://www.cis.org/articles/2003/back303.html 7/11/2003 Center for Immigration Studies Page 10 of 17 economic development projects. But the most important reason is that neither banking regulators nor the U.S. Treasury Department have objected to opening banking accounts for Mexican illegals who use the matricula as their identification. In fact, a good case can be made that regulators and the Treasury Department have tacitly encouraged banks to do so. The irony is that Mexican banks do not hold the matricula in high regard as an identity document. No major bank headquarters in Mexico lists the "matricula consular" among the several official identification documents they accept to start accounts. Perhaps recognizing that this revelation could be embarrassing, on July 1, 2002,. the Mexican Ministry of Interior instructed regional offices of the National Migration Institute that full recognition and validity be authorized for the matricula consular for identification purpose and for entry into Mexico. As of December 30, 2002, the document was being accepted in 10 of Mexico's 33 states.12. Remittances and economic development projects important to Mexico. According to the Inter -American Development Bank, money sent home to Latin America and Caribbean countries from their nationals quadrupled in the last decade to $23 billion in 2001.13 Given current migration patterns, this growth is expected to continue throughout the decade. This remittance phenomenon, combined with a concurrent decrease in U.S. foreign aid, has led the State and Treasury Departments to work jointly with the international development aid community to find ways to redirect some of the money to promote economic development in these impoverished nations. This is a high priority for President Fox. Echoing concerns shared by the World Bank and the Inter -American Development Bank, he has lamented "that an overwhelming majority of immigrant dollars sent to Mexico were used to provide for the day-to-day survival of the poorest families. Little is saved. Even less is invested in projects that could stimulate economic growth.... Mr. Fox has expanded government programs that match, peso for peso, the money that immigrants send for public works projects in their home communities."14 Mexico received $9.3 billion in remittances in 2001 but claims its citizens sent even more. The cost of money transfers gobbled up from 10 to 20 percent of the total amount remitted. The international economic aid community reasoned that large U.S. commercial banks could help decrease these high remittance -processing costs. When Mexico approached large U.S. banks to discuss lowering the cost of remittances and accepting the matricula consular to open accounts tailored to poor Mexicans, it met a receptive audience at some institutions. It is likely that executives in retail banking would have noticed the Census projections that Hispanics would soon overtake blacks as the largest minority group in America and would welcome the opportunity to tap into a large new market. Similarly, since the late 1970s, U.S. regulators have required evidence that banks have made an effort to serve poor, minority communities within their market areas. This community development activity usually reports to the executive responsible for assuring that the bank receives satisfactory ratings from its regulators. And some of those regulators, most notably the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and local Federal Reserve banks, perhaps responding to the unprecedented level of immigration in the 1990s, were concurrently sponsoring seminars about "financial literacy" for the "unbanked" in poor minority communities. The promised new "high security" matricula http://www.cis.org/articles/2003/back3O3.html 7/11 /2003 Center for Immigration Studies Page 11 of 17 would provide an opportunity to open bank accounts for the largest immigrant group in the United States. Of course, since Mexicans legally in the United States already possessed the appropriate documentation to establish bank accounts, it was understood that only undocumented Mexicans would need the matricula. The timing was also fortunate because the Internal Revenue Service had started to issue the Individual Taxpayer Identification Number, which could serve as the second ID usually required by banks to fulfill their "know your customer" obligations. Internal Revenue Service gives Mexican illegals second ID needed to open bank accounts. In 1996 the IRS, a division of the Treasury Department, began issuing Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers to foreign nationals who were not eligible to receive a Social Security card as a way to encourage compliance with U.S. tax laws. A policy decision was made to make the ITIN available to illegal immigrants based on their "substantial presence" in the United States. In its publications, website, and forms, the IRS makes clear that the ITIN is "for tax purposes only." Perhaps because of its stated limited purpose, the IRS made little or no effort to authenticate the documents presented by foreign nationals to obtain the ITIN. Perhaps it did not feel it was necessary to do so, because the agency was knowingly giving them to illegal aliens. This laxness led to a stampede of illegals from nations all around the world applying for ITINs. As of October 2002, over 5.5 million ITINs had been issued. But, strangely, only 1.5 million tax returns actually were filed using the ITIN number. It is assumed that the people who applied for the ITIN and do not file taxes are using it as official U.S. government identification to obtain driver's licenses, bank accounts, and government services. It is not known if ITINs are easily available to citizens of countries that harbor terrorists or to resident aliens appearing on the FBI's criminal database or to the more than 300,000 aliens who absconded after being served with deportation notices.15 The ITIN has been linked in media stories to the burgeoning popularity of the matricula. Banks need an official U.S. tax number to open an interest bearing account and, by definition, illegal aliens are not legally entitled to a Social Security number. So Mexican consulate staffs have been suggesting the ITIN as an acceptable alternative and, apparently, neither the banks nor the IRS raised objections. However, within the last three months, both the Treasury Department and IRS have thrown up strong warning signals that the ITIN cannot (or should not) be accepted as an identification document. In its October 21, 2002, report to Congress, the Treasury Department said "the IRS does not employ rigorous identification verification procedures. For example, a foreign national can apply for an ITIN by mail or through an authorized ITIN Acceptance Agent, which is a person or entity authorized by the IRS to take applications."16 Similarly, on December 17, 2002, the IRS announced that henceforth applicants must submit documents proving their alien status and identity.1-7 It is unclear exactly how or if the IRS plans to use this information. It has a policy of shielding illegal immigrants from exposure to the INS, which has seemed to continue even though the USA Patriot Act explicitly calls for greater information sharing among government agencies, law enforcement, and the intelligence community.18 U.S. Treasury gives banks comfort to accept the matricula. A key factor influencing the banking community to accept the matricula is its belief that the U.S. Treasury Department http://www.cis.org/articles/2003/back303.html 7/11/2003 Center for Immigration Studies Page 12 of 17 has given its approval. 9 "Under section 326(b) of the USA Patriot Act, Congress directed that Treasury, in consultation with the federal functional regulators and other relevant agencies, study and provide recommendations for enhancing the ability of domestic financial institutions to verify the identity of foreign nationals."20 In its report to Congress, Treasury spelled out what type of information a financial institution may require from a non-U.S. person seeking to open an account: "The regulations state that financial institutions may accept one or more of the following: a U.S. taxpayer identification number; a passport number and country of issuance; an alien identification card number, or the number and country of issuance of any other government -issued document evidencing nationality or residence and bearing a photograph or similar safeguard." (Italics added.)21- That sentence was followed by footnote 17. It was a shocker. "Thus, the proposed regulations do not discourage bank acceptance of the `matricula consular' identity card that is being issued by the Mexican government to immigrants." The intent of the USA Patriot Act of 2001, passed overwhelmingly by Congress in response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks, was to strengthen our homeland security. It addressed the issue of secure identification because the hijackers had obtained both Social Security numbers and driver's licenses. Especially in this context, it is difficult to comprehend why Treasury went out of its way to give approval to an identity card being offered by a single foreign government whose contiguous border is a matter of acute concern to the United States and whose nationals represent the majority of illegals within the United States. Matricula Leads to a Drivers License As we saw with the hijackers, illegal aliens of all nationalities prize a state -issued driver's license above all other identity documents because it serves as a domestic passport. It is the most widely accepted identity document in America and gains you access to places, services, and transportation. Once a Mexican has a driver's license, he or she could throw away their matricula. It would no longer be needed. After 9/11, it was generally recognized that current state driver's license laws, regulations, and procedures are rife with loopholes and subject to political pressure. A number of states immediately took action to close administrative loopholes and introduce legislation to more tightly control the conditions under which foreign nationals illegally in the United States can obtain driver's licenses. Some states still openly subvert federal immigration law and issue licenses to illegal aliens. Their justification usually is a pragmatic one. Illegals are going to drive anyway to get to work, and it improves public safety if they pass a driver's test, know the rules of the road, and obtain insurance. In trying to grapple with this issue, some state legislatures have suggested a compromise. Licenses would be issued to undocumented individuals but the front of the license would bear a message similar to "For driving purposes only." This resulted in torrents of criticism from immigrants and their advocates, charges of discrimination and racism and the pronouncement that driving is a basic human right. The bottom line is that illegal aliens want a driver's license precisely because it masks their illegal status. Two states with large undocumented populations resist lobbying and just say "No." Although there is some dispute as to the actual number of states accepting the matricula as http://www.cis.org/articles/2003/back303.html 7/11 /2003 Center for Immigration Studies Page 13 of 17 proof of identity to obtain a driver's license, Mexico says 13 states are doing so. Consulate officials are actively lobbying other states to either alter motor vehicle department regulations regarding acceptable identity documents for undocumented aliens or pass legislation that would explicitly permit acceptance of the matricula. The new, improved matricula became available to residents of New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut in March 2002. The news was announced by the regional Mexican consul who said "The ideal would be if the matriculation card could gain points to obtain a driver's license in the tri-state area.... We are holding talks now with representatives from the departments of transportation of the three states."22 But New York's Department of Motor Vehicles refused to add the matricula to its list of approved identity documents to obtain a driver's license. "In other cities the validity of the Mexican ID card has prompted heated debates over whether recognition would amount to legitimization of illegal immigrants. New York politicians, however, rarely raise issues relating to the legal or illegal status of immigrants. Instead, the conversations in city and state offices over the Mexican ID have focused on the heightened concerns over security and identity fraud since the terrorist attacks."23 Similarly, in a year he was standing for re-election in the state with the largest Mexican population, California Governor Gray Davis showed political courage by vetoing legislation that would have granted licenses to illegal immigrants. He did so despite the fact that the legislation had been significantly revised to address concerns he had raised; "The bills would have allowed illegal immigrants to obtain licenses if they passed all driving tests, underwent criminal background checks, were applying for legal residency and could prove they were employed and had lived in California for at least 15 months in the last three years."24 The governor's veto message said, "the tragedy of September 11 made it abundantly clear that the driver's license is more than just a license to drive; it is one of the primary documents we use to identify ourselves."25 While this veto outraged many in the Hispanic community, not all opposed the governor's decision. Not only did the California Hispanic Chamber of Commerce subsequently endorse him for re-election, its president said her group had "similar concerns as to what the governor expressed. We agree with what he did." And others, such as the chairman of the Latino Journal's editorial board, expressed disappointment but said that it "wasn't a make - or -break issue" for Integrity of driver's licenses is a security matter. States historilidly have protected their _right to issue driver's licenses, and any federal attem erfere has been fiercely opp sed711-elVIexican government seems to un erstand this and is actively lobbying state legislatures to grant special dispensation to matricula cardholders from "proof of legal residence" requirements. This activity endangers homeland security because today the state driver's license, with all its weaknesses, is the most accepted American identity document. It is a prime example of the almost non-existent interior enforcement of our immigration laws that states would even consider issuing it to illegal aliens. The American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators (AAMVA) is helping states develop national standards with respect to driver's licenses' appearance, data content, and security requirements. Cards would be made more tamper -proof and consideration is being http://www.cis.org/articles/2003/back3O3.html 7/11/2003 Center for Immigration Studies Page 14 of 17 given to including a biometric identifier, such as a fingerprint or retinal scan. There would also be a uniform set of standards regarding the documents needed to prove identity, residency, and legal status of non -citizens. Identity documents would be verified electronically with appropriate federal agencies. Similarly, to ensure that no individual holds more than one valid driver's license at a time, a computer link would give states access to each other's driver databases.27 Several congressional bills were introduced in 2002 that addressed different aspects of the integrity of America's identity documents. They didn't move out of committee, so there was no public debate on the merits. Past congressional efforts to tighten document security in part by linking databases have been fiercely opposed by a coalition of civil libertarians, data privacy groups, states rights advocates, and libertarians concerned with government intrusion. Current sentiment seems to lean toward letting state motor vehicle departments, AAMVA, and organizations such as the National Governors Association and the National Conference of State Legislatures try to reach consensus on uniform issuance and card security standards. If that is accomplished, the next issue would be how best to implement those standards. One option would be federal legislation. The specter of the Mexican government heavily lobbying state motor vehicle departments and state legislatures to accept the matricula as a valid identity document is energizing those discussions. Institutionalized Illegality No one disputes that Mexico has a right to issue the matricula consular and maintain a registry of its citizens living in other nations. What is in dispute is the wisdom of American institutions and governmental entities accepting as official identification a foreign government's document, the purpose of which is to make it easier for their nationals to reside in the United States illegally. This issue extends beyond the immediate example of Mexico and the matricula and must be considered in terms of precedent -setting policy for treatment of other foreign governments who wish to do the same for their illegal populations. Within the last month, these concerns have been raised by members of Congress in letters sent to the Secretary of State and the Treasury Department and by the Governor of Colorado, who asked a Mexican consul general to explain her office's lobbying efforts on behalf of the matricula. Similarly, concerned citizens' organizations have become more vocal at the local level, explaining U.S. immigration law as regards illegal aliens and pointing out legal risks localities may run by subverting those laws. The reason why we find ourselves addressing the far-reaching implications of the matricula issue is an almost total lack of interior enforcement of our immigration laws. This has resulted in an illegal population of nine million people — 40 percent are visa overstayers and 60 percent crossed our borders without permission. Of the latter group, the vast majority are Mexicans. The matricula issue has starkly highlighted the dangers inherent in this benign neglect. Immigrant advocates, politicians, and businesses seeking cheap labor have been successful in blurring the distinction between legal and illegal immigration. But it is a distinction the American people find easy to make, as evidenced by numerous public opinion polls spanning many years. http://www.cis.org/articles/2003[back303.html 7/11 /2003 Center for Immigration Studies Page 15 of 17 Accepting a less than secure identity card from Mexico would be the functional equivalent of a quasi -amnesty for approximately 50 percent of our illegal population without any national debate on the merits and implications of that action. Accepting a less than secure identity card from any country further erodes our ability and incentive to control which foreign nationals can enter and live permanently in the U.S. It has profound implications for future immigration policy and evolving policies regarding homeland security. End Notes 1 "New ID Helps Mexicans Come Out of the Shadows," El Diario, March 20, 2002. 2 Olson, David, "Matricular consular helps new residents prove identity, obtain services, The News and Observer (Raleigh, NC), August 12, 2002. 3 Giovine, Patricia, "Gov't urges migrants to stop using fake identities," Agencia EFE, November 21, 2002. 4 "Migrants to U.S. are a major resource for Mexico," The New York Times, March 25, 2002; Sachs, Susan, "Citing security, New York rejects Mexican ID cards," The New York Times, December 28, 2002. 5 Riley, Michael, "Mexican ID cards caught in growing debate," Denver Post, October 10, 2002. 6 "Mas de un million 40 mil matriculas consulares expedidas en Estados Unidos en 2002," Secretaria de Relaciones Exteriores, Comunicado de prensa No. 282/02, 30 de diciembre de 2002. 7 Sheridan, Mary Beth, "An entry card for immigrants," The Washington Post, July 26, 2002; pg. B 1. 8 "An entry card for immigrants," op.cit. 9 Iwasaki, John, "Mexicans in the U.S. get that second piece of I.D," The Seattle Post- Intelligencer, December 7, 2002. to Golden, Tim, "Mexican Drug Dealers Turning U.S. Towns Into Major Depots," The New York Times, November 16, 2002. 11 "Mexican Drug Dealers Turning U.S. Towns into Major Depots," op.cit. 12 "Mas de un million 40 mil matriculas consulares expedidas en estados unidos en 2002," op. cit. 13 Gamboa, Suzanne, "Report: Migrants Sent Home $23B," Star Tribune, November 22, 2002. http://www.cis.org/articles/2003/back303.html 7/11/2003 Center for Immigration Studies Page 16 of 17 14 Thompson, Ginger, "Migrants to U.S. are a major resource for Mexico," The New York Times, March 25, 2002. 15 Dinerstein, Marti, "Giving Cover to Illegal Aliens: IRS Tax ID Numbers Subvert Immigration Law," CIS Backgrounder, November 2002. http_://www cis. org/articles/2002/back 1202.html. 16 http•//www ustreas gov/press/releases/reports/sec326breportfinal pdf 17 "IRS makes changes to individual taxpayer identification number (ITIN) application," Internal Revenue Service, News Release, IR-02-139 (17 Dec 2002. 18 "Giving Cover to Illegal Aliens: IRS Tax ID Numbers Subvert Immigration Law," op.cit. 19 Gori, Graham, "A card allows U.S. banks to aid Mexican immigrants," The New York Times, July 6, 2002. 20 "Treasury Department Issues USA PATRIOT Act Report to Congress," Office of Public Affairs, Treasury Department, PO-3567, October 22, 2002. 21 http•//www ustreas.goy/press/releases/reports/sec326breport.final.pdf 22 "New ID Helps Mexicans Come out of the Shadows," op.cit. 23 "Citing Security, New York Rejects Mexican ID Cards," op.cit. 24 Vogel, Nancy and Dan Morain, "No Licenses for Illegal Immigrants: Davis vetoes measure despite vows of support, citing national security, as he faces deadline for legislation in his first term," The Los Angeles Times, October 1, 2002. 25 http //www..goy_ernor.ca,gov/go_v_.site/msdocs/press._release/L02. 246.._AB_6_.0and ._ SB_804_veto messaae.doc 26 Talev, Margaret and Kevin Yamamura, "Davis defends driver's license veto," The Sacramento Bee, October 19, 2002. hitp://www.sacbee.com/content/politics/story/4856842p-5870062c.html 27 Dinerstein, Marti, "America's Identity Crisis: Document Fraud is Pervasive and Pernicious," CIS Backgrounder, April 2002. http://www.cis.org/articles/2002/back3O2.html Marti Dinerstein (mdinerstein@earthlink.net) is President of Immigration Matters, a public policy analysis firm in New York, and is a Fellow at the Center for Immigration Studies. She is the author.of two recent Backgrounders: "America's Identity Crisis: Document Fraud is Pervasive and Pernicious" and "Giving Cover to Illegal Aliens: IRS Tax ID Numbers Subvert Immigration Law." http://www.cis.org/articles/2003/back3O3.htm1 7/11 /2003 I The Seattle Times: Man held without bail in slaying of Chelan deputy Page 1 of 2 - SeattleFSBO.com RR —OWN Buy or Sell Homes Commission FREE! A Service of The Seattle Times Company seattletimes.corn NWdassifieds NWsa `�`"�eS Z WEB ARCHIVE Home d4 Contact Search HOME Local News: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 Site index Join Web archive Man held without bail in slaying of Chelan °"lI"e Help _ Other searches deputy Nw,, o ---------------- By The Associated Press ,Online_se Producer. Lead a pro WENATCHEE — A man accused of killing a 0 E-mail this article in the crea Chelan County sheriffs deputy made his first online pros court appearance yesterday, and the slain Print this article services fo increasing officer's brother was there, too. share, and advertisers "I just really wanted to look into his eyes, see what he was really about, who customers he really was," said Al Gallegos of Topeka, Kan., in an interview with Seattle's KING -TV. Gallegos' older brother, Deputy Saul Gallegos, was shot during a traffic stop last week. A memorial service is scheduled for today at the Chelan High School gymnasium for the married father of four boys. Jose Sanchez Guillen, 21, of Manson, Chelan County, was ordered held l without bail by Chelan County Superior Court Judge John Bridges. Arraignment will be scheduled within the next two weeks. Sanchez was booked into the Chelan County jail Sunday for investigation of aggravated first -degree murder in the June 26 fatal shooting. If the charge stands, the aggravating factor —the fatal shooting of a police 1 officer — could prompt prosecutors to seek the death penalty. The only other penalty for that crime in Washington is life imprisonment without hope of . j parole. "I don't see the death penalty benefiting anybody," Al Gallegos said. "I mean, he also has a family as well, and I don't see that's really going to be any justice for them." Chelan County Prosecutor Gary Riesen said the family's wishes would be taken into consideration, along with other factors. Gallegos, 35, of Chelan, was shot once in the head after he pulled Sanchez over in Manson for investigation of driving without a license. Copyright 2003 The Seattle Times Company http://archives.seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-binitexis.cgi/weblvortexldisplay?slug=offices... 7/31/2003 The Seattle Times: Slain deputy's body taken to Mexico town for burial Page 1 of 2 SeattleFSBO.com -' Buy or Sell Homes ` ~ Commission FREE! A Service of The Seattle Times Company `- j VUEB ARCHIVE 5e _S21?'8ti5e5.CQ^i _ HOME Local News: Sunday, July 06, 2003 Site index ---------------- Web archive Slain deputy's body taken to Mexico town Help Other searches ---------------- for burial By The Associated Press WENATCHEE — The body of slain Chelan a E-mail this article County Deputy Saul Gallegos has arrived in 5 print this article his hometown in El Colecio, Mexico. ._...... - FIND A ,161 PLACE TO A crowd of about 200 people had gathered along the street outside the family SHARE. home of his widow, Maria, when the hearse arrived Friday night. The casket was placed in the front room of the home so people of the small village could pay their respects before a funeral Mass and burial yesterday. Gallegos was buried in Mexico at his father's request. "He told me, 'Dad, if something happens to me, I want to be in my town,' " his father, Rafael Gallegos, told The Wenatchee World. "We are fulfilling his wish." Gallegos, 35, was shot to death after a traffic st 6 near Manson. I The man he's believed to have st ed, Jose Sanchez Guillen, 21, has en charged with aggravated first-dei murder. A Learjet flew Gallegos' body from Wenatchee to Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico, on Friday. Chelan County Deputy Dale England and Wenatchee police Officer Homer Ramirez accompanied the body. Copyright 2003 The Seattle Times Company SeattleAreaHomes.com • Buyers a.gents.,__Free help,.._Search. Home d4 Contact Search Ca Impra oppe: Seattle Ui Master of I Administra Join us for informatioi Seattle W Master of Nursing Open__Hous Seattle P: University Master of Informatio. Manageme Attend our Informatio Seattle Pi University Graduate i What woul• be? UW Exten Evening ar Learning C Programs Choose fro different of tea, S_e..arch_web. archive. v M http://archives.seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-binitexis.cgi/weblvortexldisplay?slub officer... 7/31/2003 Secretary of Treasury Holds Key to Killing Matricula Consular Cards Page 1 of 1 American Patrol Feature June 27, 2003 Snow Time to Waste - Contact John Snow Secretan- of Treasury Holds Key to Killing N- l_a...tricula Consular Cards John Snow Sec. of the Treasury Battle Rages in Washington June 27, 2003 -- The battle over congressional action to deal with phony IDs issued by the Mexican government rages on, with the FBI and State Department coming down against the Matricula Consular cards. The only holdout seems to be Secretary of the Treasury, John Snow. Critics say Snow is caving in to pressure from U.S. Banks that want deposits from drug and people smugglers. American Patrol is urging people to contact Secretary Snow to tell him to reject the big money interests and support the people of America. John Snow can be reached at (202) 622-6516 -- (More Info) External links may expire at any time. http://www.americanpatrol.org/FEATURES/030627-SHAM-IDs-CALL-TREAS/030627 F..a 7/11/2003 Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board.. Staff Contact...... CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AJLS/Mayor's Office Jesse Tanner, Mayor Subject: Reappointment of Vern Nichols to the Human Rights and Affairs Commission Exhibits: Recommended Action: Council Concur For Agenda of: August 4, 2003 Agenda Status Consent .............. Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Ordinance ............. Resolution........... . Old Business........ New Business....... Study Sessions...... Information........ . Approvals: Legal Dept......... Finance Dept...... Other ............... Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Mayor Tanner reappoints Vern Nichols to the Human Rights and Affairs Commission for a two-year term expiring on 9/19/05. Mr. Nichols' address is: 194 Monterey Place NE, Renton, WA 98056; Phone: 425-226-5995. The other members of the Human Rights and Affairs Commission are: Edythe Gandy, Sandel Demastus, Antonio Cube, Sr., Lari White, Charles Thomas, and Glen Williams. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Confirm the reappointment of Vern Nichols to the Human Rights and Affairs Commission. 1/ CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL :Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board. Staff Contact...... AJLS/City Clerk Bonnie Walton Subject: St. Anthony Parish Street Vacation Petitions; Portions of Whitworth Ave. S. and a portion of the alley running north/south between Whitworth and Morris Ave. S. and S. 3rd & 41h Streets; Petitioner: Catholic Archbishop of Seattle, a corporation sole. VAC-00-003 and VAC-03-001. Exhibits: Staff memos (7/14/2003 and 7/25/2003) Final Ordinances Al #: "l t For Agenda of: Agenda Status Consent .............. X Public Hearing... Correspondence - Ordinance ............. Resolution............ Old Business........ New Business....... Study Sessions...... Information......... Recommended Action: Approvals: Council Concur Legal Dept......... X Finance Dept...... Other ............... Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted.......... Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: August 4, 2003 On July 15, 2002, the City Council approved the request to vacate a portion of Whitworth Ave. S. subject to the execution and recording of a development agreement. (VAC-00-003) On March 10, 2003, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 3623, authorizing execution of a development agreement with St. Anthony's Parish through the Corporation of the Catholic Archbishop of Seattle. The Development Agreement was executed March 11, 2003, and has been recorded with King County under recording number 20030514000836. On April 7, 2003, the City Council approved the request to vacate the alley running north and south between Whitworth and Morris Avenues S. and S. 3rd and S 4th streets, subject to conditions related to utilities, utility easements and the Development Agreement. (VAC-03-001) On June 23, 2003, the Renton City Council accepted the appraisal for the street vacation properties and set compensation at seventy-five percent (75%) of the full appraised value. (VAC-00-003 & VAC-03-001) On July 3, 2003, compensation in the amount set by Council was received by the City Clerk ($137,520 for VAC-00-003 and $14,400 for VAC-03-001; total $151,920). Per staff, conditions of the vacation approvals and compliance with the Development Agreement have been met. The ordinances are presented for adoption by the City Council to finalize the street vacations. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt ordinances. CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: July 14, 2003 TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: --�Mayor Jesse Tanner FROM: Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Lesley Nishihira, Development/Planning, x7270 SUBJECT: St. Anthony's Parish Street Vacations ISSUE: Adoption of street vacation ordinance(s) relating to approved vacated rights -of -way located within the St. Anthony's Parish Campus. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: As part of a conditional approval to vacate a portion of Whitworth Avenue South at St. Anthony's request (VAC-00-003), the City Council required the execution and recording of a development agreement to be entered into by the City and the Parish. The Council also conditionally approved a second street vacation request (VAC-03-001) subject to conditions relating to utilities and utility easements. Pursuant to Council's condition of approval, the City and the Parish cooperatively established and entered into the required development agreement — which was executed on March 11, 2003 and subsequently recorded with King County under recording number 20030514000836. With the exception of the adoption of the street vacation ordinance(s) and the issuance of building permits, both parties have complied with all aspects of the street vacation process as established by the agreement. In addition to fulfilling the requirements established by the agreement, all conditions of approval imposed by Council pertaining to the approved street vacations have been satisfied by St. Anthony's Parish. At present, construction (also known as "utility") permits to allow for site preparation and utility construction activities have been approved and will be issued in the near future. The review of the building permits, however, is still underway with the second round of review concluding shortly. Second and final reading of the street vacation ordinance(s) will not take place until building permits have been approved. Once the ordinances have been adopted, the building permits will be available for issuance. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council adopt the street vacation ordinance(s). cc: Neil Watts Jennifer Henning Lesley Nishihira C1T`l OF RF—. TC l RE=CE=.1V-D CITY OF RENTON cET`r c�E,;E;' , OFFICE- PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: JuLY 25, 2003 TO: MAYOR TANNER FROM: VEIL WATTS � SUBJECT: WHITWORTH AVE S STREET VACATION Development Services has completed review of the building permits for the St. Anthony project. The building permits are ready to issue, pending final vacation of the right-of- way. All conditions for the street vacation have been completed, including payment of the associated street vacation fee. We recommend that the final street vacation be placed on the Council agenda for first reading at the next Council meeting (August 4). The construction permit for relocating the City utilities and installation of a new drainage system has already been issued. A preconstruction meeting has been conducted with the contractor, and they can begin on the utility work at this time. The building permits for the project cannot be issued until the street vacation is completed. cc: Jay Covington Gregg Zimmerman Dave Christensen Karen McFarland Jason Jordan OIVELOF OF g'PLN 1i�iG C� 3131,2 % 003 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, VACATING A PORTION OF WHITWORTH AVENUE SOUTH BETWEEN SOUTH 3" AND 4TH STREETS, AND A PORTION OF THE ALLEY RUNNING NORTH AND SOUTH BETWEEN WHITWORTH AND MORRIS AVENUES SOUTH AND SOUTH 3" AND 4TH STREETS. (ST. ANTHONY PARISH; VAC-00-003) WHEREAS, a proper petition for vacating a portion of Whitworth Avenue South between South 3rd and 41h Streets, and a portion of the alley running north and south between Whitworth and Morris Avenues South and South 3`d and 4th Streets, was duly filed with the City Clerk on or about June 26, 2000, and said petition having been signed by the owners representing more than two-thirds (2/3) of the property abutting upon such street sought to be vacated; and WHEREAS, the City Council, by Resolution No. 3494 passed and approved on March 26, 2001, and after due investigation did fix and determine the day of April 23, 2001, at the hour of 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the City of Renton to be the time and place for a public hearing thereon; and the City Clerk having given due notice of such hearings in the manner provided by law, and all persons having been heard appearing in favor or in opposition thereto, and the City Council having considered all information and arguments presented to it; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 3623, passed and approved on March 10, 2003, the Council authorized a Development Agreement between St. Anthony's and the City of Renton, which was recorded with King County on May 14, 2003; WHEREAS, the Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department having duly considered said petition for said vacation, and having found same to be in the public interest 1 ORDINANCE NO. and for the public benefit, and no injury or damage to any person or properties will result from such vacation; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The following described parts of Whitworth Avenue South and parallel alley, to wit: (A portion of Whitworth Avenue South between South 3`d and &h Streets, and a portion of the alley running north and south between Whitworth and Morris Avenues South and South 3` and 4`b Streets) See Exhibits "A," `B," and "C" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein be and the same is hereby vacated subject to an easement over, across, under and on all that part as described on Exhibits "A" and `B" in favor of the City. This easement is for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, installing, repairing, replacing, enlarging, operating and maintaining utilities and utility pipelines, including, but not limited to, water, sewer and storm drainage lines, together with the right of ingress and egress thereto without prior institution of any suit or proceedings of law and without incurring any legal obligation or liability therefor. The City may from time to time construct such additional facilities as it may require. This easement is subject to the following terms and conditions: That a utility easement be retained over the entire right-of-way, with the understanding that the property may be developed fully if the existing utilities are relocated at the sole cost of the developer; and That this easement shall run with the land described herein, and shall be binding upon the 2 ORDINANCE NO. parties, their heirs, successors in interest and assigns. This vacation is further subject to that certain Development Agreement between the City and the Petitioner, filed May 14, 2003, under auditor's file number 20030514000836. SECTION H. The City Council hereby elects to charge a fee of $137,520 (One Hundred Thirty -Seven Thousand, Five Hundred and Twenty Dollars) to the petitioner -owners, said amount being 75% of the City's appraised value of the right-of-way interest herein vacated, and such charge being reasonable and proper. SECTION III. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after its publication. A certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed with the Office of Records and Elections, and as otherwise provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 3 Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk day of Jesse Tanner, Mayor 2003. 2003. ORDINANCE NO. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1039:7/17/03:ma EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION STREET VACATION VAC-00-003 Beginning at the northeast corner of Lot 22, Block 1, Smithers Fifth Addition to the Town of Renton, According to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 16 of Plats, Page 33, records of King County, Washington; Thence South 89*38'01" East, a distance of 60.00 feet, to the northwest corner of Lot 9, Block 1, Smithers Fourth Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, Page 19, records of King County, Washington; Thence South 00°20'32" West, along the west line of said Block 1 of Smithers Fourth Addition to the Town of Renton, a distance of 274.43 feet, to the beginning of a curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 12 feet and a central angle of 56°26'34" and being subtended by a chord which bears South 61'26'11" East, a distance of 11.35 feet; Thence southeasterly and easterly along said curve, being the northerly margin of a parcel of land conveyed to the City of Renton by instrument filed under Recording Number 7305180517, records of King County, Washington, a distance of 11.82 feet, to a point of cusp with the south line of said Block 1 of Smithers Fourth Addition to the Town of Renton; Thence North 89°40'04" West, along the said south line and its westerly extension, a distance of 40.00 feet, to a point on the easterly extension of the south line of said Block 1, Smithers Fifth Addition to the Town of Renton; Thence North 89°39'25" West, along the said south line and its easterly extension, a distance of 40.00 feet, to a point of cusp on a curve concave to the northwest having a radius of 12 feet and a central angle of 56°26'34" and being subtended by a chord which bears North 62°07' 15" East, a distance of 11.3 5 feet; Thence easterly and northeasterly along said curve, being the northerly margin of a parcel of land to be conveyed to the City of Renton by instrument filed under Recording Number 7305180515, records of King County, Washington, a distance of 11.82 feet, to a point on the east line of said Block 1 of Smithers Fifth Addition to the Town of Renton; Thence North 00°20'32" East, along said line, a distance of 274.43 feet, to the Point of Beginning. ALL SITUATE in the Southeast Quarter of Section 18, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. EXHIBIT B LEGAL DESCRIPTION STREET VACATION VAC-00-003 A portion of the alley located in Block 1 of Smithers Fourth Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, Page 19, records of King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of Lot 15 of said plat; Thence northerly along the westerly right-of-way margin of said alley, a distance of 160 feet, to the northeast corner of Lot 12 of said plat; Thence easterly along the easterly projection of the northerly boundary line of said Lot 12, a distance of 16 feet, to the northwest corner of Lot 19 of said plat; Thence southerly along the easterly right-of-way margin of said alley, a distance of 160 feet, to the southwest corner of Lot 16 of said plat; Thence westerly along the westerly projection of the southerly boundary line of said Lot 15, a distance of 16 feet, to the Point of Beginning. ALL SITUATE in the Southeast Quarter of Section 18, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. I i I I I i I I V'+ Whitworth Avenue S ^'* CO CD Shattuck Avenue S �r u is I CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, VACATING A PORTION OF THE ALLEY RUNNING NORTH AND SOUTH BETWEEN WHITWORTH AND MORRIS AVENUES SOUTH AND SOUTH 3" AND 4TH STREETS. (ST. ANTHONY PARISH, VAC-03- 001) WHEREAS, a proper petition for vacating a portion of the alley running north and south between Whitworth and Morris Avenues South and South 3`d and 0 Streets was duly filed with the City Clerk on or about January 17, 2003, and said petition having been signed by the owners representing more than two-thirds (2/3) of the property abutting upon such street sought to be vacated; and WHEREAS, the City Council, by Resolution No. 3 62 1, passed and approved on February 24, 2003, and after due investigation did fix and determine the day of March 24tb, 2003, at the hour of 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the City of Renton to be the time and place for a public hearing thereon; and the City Clerk having given due notice of such hearings in the manner provided by law, and all persons having been heard appearing in favor or in opposition thereto, and the City Council having considered all information and arguments presented to it; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 3623, passed and approved on March 10, 2003, the Council authorized a Development Agreement between St. Anthony's and the City of Renton, which was recorded with King County on May 14, 2003, under auditor's file number 20030514000836, which is applicable according to its terms to the alley being vacated by this ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department having duly considered said petition for said vacation, and having found same to be in the public interest 1 ORDINANCE NO. and for the public benefit, and no injury or damage to any person or properties will result from such vacation; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The following described part of Whitworth Avenue South, to wit: (A portion of the alley running north and south between Whitworth and Morris Avenues South and South 3`d and 41b Streets) See Exhibits "A" and `S" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein be and the same is hereby vacated subject to an easement over, across, under and on all that part as described on Exhibit "A" in favor of the City. This easement is for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, installing, repairing, replacing, enlarging, operating and maintaining utilities and utility pipelines, including, but not limited to, water, sewer and storm drainage lines, together with the right of ingress and egress thereto without prior institution of any suit or proceedings of law and without incurring any legal obligation or liability therefor. The City may from time to time construct such additional facilities as it may require. This easement is subject to the following terms and conditions: That a utility easement be retained over the entire right-of-way, with the understanding that the property may be developed fully if the existing utilities are relocated at the sole cost of the developer; and That this easement shall run with the land described herein, and shall be binding upon the parties, and their heirs and successors in interest and assigns. This vacation is further subject to that certain Development Agreement between the City 2 ORDINANCE NO. and the Petitioner, filed May 14, 2003, under auditor's file number 20030514000836. SECTION II. The City Council hereby elects to charge a fee of $14,400 (Fourteen Thousand, Four Hundred Dollars) to the petitioner -owners, said amount being 75% of the City's appraised value of the right-of-way interest herein vacated, and such charge being reasonable and proper. SECTION III. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after its publication. A certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed with the Office of Records and Elections, and as otherwise provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2003. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1040:7/18/03 :ma 3 Jesse Tanner, Mayor 2003. EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION STREET VACATION VAC-03-001 A portion of the alley located in Block 1 of Smithers Fourth Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, Page 19, records of King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of Lot 11 of said plat; Thence northerly along the westerly right-of-way margin of said alley, a distance of 120 feet, to the northeast corner of Lot 9 of said plat; Thence easterly along the easterly projection of the northerly boundary line of said Lot 9, a distance of 16 feet, to the northwest corner of Lot 22 of said plat; Thence southerly along the easterly right-of-way margin of said alley, a distance of 120 feet, to the southwest corner of Lot 20 of said plat; Thence westerly along the westerly projection of the southerly boundary line of said Lot 20, a distance of 16 feet, to the Point of Beginning. Situate in the Southeast Quarter of Section 18, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. Exhibit-6 Map Exhibit Street Vacation VAC-03-001 St. Anthony's Alley Vacation S 3rd St a) Q 0 > Q U Q CIS _U) L v f S 4th St LVAC-00-003- VAC-03-001 tY Technical Service ♦ ♦ 1=11i-/ fic Wad¢ K McFalmd 27 7mmmy 2003 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBMITTING DATA: Dept/Div/Board.. City Clerk Staff Contact... Bonnie Walton SUBJECT: Bid opening on July 29, 2003, for CAG-03-115, East Kennydale Sanitary Sewer Infill & Water Main Replacement Phase H Project EXHIBITS: Staff Recommendation Bid Tabulation Sheet (five bids) AI #: FOR AGENDA OF: August 4, AGENDA STATUS: Consent......... X Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Ordinance....... Resolution...... Old Business.... New Business.... Study Session... Other........... RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPROVALS: Legal Dept...... Council concur Finance Dept.... Other........... FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required... $1,310,562.37 Transfer/Amendment.. Amount Budgeted........ $1,500,000.00 Revenue Generated... ISUMMARY OF ACTION: Engineer's Estimate: $1,285,696.13 RECOMMENDED ACTION: In accordance with Council procedure, bids submitted at the subject bid opening met the following three criteria: There was more than one bid, the low bid was within the project budget, and there were no irregularities. Therefore, staff recommends acceptance of the low bid submitted by RCI Construction Group in the amount of $1,310,562.37. CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: July 30, 2003 TO: Bonnie Walton, City Clerk FROM: John Hobson (x-7279) SUBJECT: Bid Award Re: East Kennydale Sewer Infill & Water Main Replacement Phase II The Planning/Building/Public Works Department has reviewed the bids submitted for the East Kennydale Sewer Infill & Water Main Replacement Phase II project and recommends that the bid be awarded to RCI. We are requesting that an agenda bill for "Council Concur" be prepared for the August 4`h Council Meeting. The bid opening was on Tuesday, July 29, 2003. There were 5 bids received. There were no irregularities in any of the bids. The low bidder is RCI, with a bid of $1,310,562.37. The engineer's estimate was $1,285,696.13. The project budget amount is $1,500,000. The low bid is within the existing budget. The project will install approximately 4,300 linear feet of new sanitary sewer main and 2,000 linear feet of side sewers in streets that do not currently have sewer service. It will also replace approximately 4,385 linear feet of old, undersized water mains within the project zone. W:\WWP-27-3078 East Kennydale Sewer Infill PH 11\Award-C1er1<.doc CITY OF RENTON BID TABULATION SHEET ROJECT: East Kennydale Sanitary Sewer Infill & Water Main Replacement Phase II; CAG-03-115 DATE: July 29, 2003 FORMS BID Proposal/ BIDDER Bid Triple Includes 8.8% Sales Tax Bond Form Frank Coluccio Const. Co. X X $1,621,752.13 9600 M.L. King Jr. Way S. Seattle, WA 98118 Joseph Coluccio Gary Merlino Const. Co., Inc. X X $1,347,493.44 9125 loth Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98108 Brian J. Kittleson RCI Construction Group X X $1,310,562.37 PO Box 1730 Sumner, WA 98390 Dennis L. Irick Thomco Const., Inc. X X $1,349,647.68 303 N. Olympic Ave. Aington, WA 98223 David Thomas West Coast Const. Co., Inc. X X $1,357,796.80 PO Box 419 Woodinville, WA 98072 Hunter Sather ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE TOTAL: $1,285,696.13 —EGEND: Form: Triple Fonn: Non -Collusion Affidavit, Anti -Trust Claims, Minimum Wage CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI : Submitting Data: For Agenda of: August 4, 2003 Dept/Div/Board.. Community Services/Parks Division Agenda Status Staff Contact...... Bill Rasmussen Capital Project Coordinator (ext. 6617) Consent .............. X Public Hearing.. Subject: Liberty Park Skate Park Revisions - CAG-03-002 Correspondence.. Ordinance ............. Resolution............ Old Business........ New Business....... Exhibits: Notice of Completion of Public Works Contract Study Sessions...... Copy of Final Pay Estimate Information......... Copy of Application and Certificate of Payment Recommended Action: Approvals: Council Concur Legal Dept......... Finance Dept...... Other ............... Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... $3,263.26 Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted.......... $84,100.00 Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget $84 100.00 City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The safety and operational improvements at Liberty Park Skate Park have been completed in accordance with contract documents. The project had $5,918.72 in change orders. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Council accept the project, and authorize the release of retainage in the amount of $3,263.26 upon receipt of all required releases. 2003-157aa State of Washington Department of Revenue ���► PO Box 47474 RFVE 11F Olympia WA 98504-7474 Contractor's Registration No. (UBI No.) Date NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT From: City of Renton Tracy Schuld 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Assigned To Date Assigned Notice is hereby given relative to the completion of contract or project described below Description of Contract Contract Number Safety/operational improvements to Liberty Pk Skate Pk CAG-03-002 Contractor's Name Telephone Number T.F. Sahli Construction, Inc. 206-248-0580 Contractor's Address P.O. Box 332, Seahurst, WA 98062 Date Work Commenced Date Work Completed Date Work Accepted 4/ 18/03 7/ 17/03 7/ 17/03 Surety or Bonding Company Western Surety Company ;ent's Address Lynn Horton, State of South Dakota Contract Amount $ 59,825.00 Additions $ + 5,440.00 Liquidated Damages $ 0.00 Reductions $ — 0.00 Sub -Total $ 65,265.00 Amount Disbursed $ 67,745.06 Amount of Sales Tax Paid at 8.8 % $ 5,743.32 Amount Retained $ 3,263.26 (If various rates apply, please send a breakdown.) TOTAL $ 71,008.32 TOTAL $ 71,008.32 Comments: Signature Type or Print Name Tracy Schuld Phone Number 425-430-6918 The Disbursing Officer must complete and mail THREE copies of this notice to the Department of Revenue, PO Box 47474, Olympia, WA 98504-7474, immediately after acceptance of the work done under this contract. NO YMENT SHALL BE MADE FROM RETAINED FUNDS until receipt of Department's certificate, and then only in ,ordance with said certificate. To inquire about the availability of this document in an alternate format for the visually impaired, please call (360) 753-3217. Teletype (TTY) users please call (800) 451-7985. You may also access tax information on our Internet home page at http://dor.wa.gov. REV 31 0020e (6-27-01) DATE: TO: FROM: ONTRACTOR: PROJECT NAME: CONTRACT NO.: July 18, 2003 Tracy Schuld Bill Rasmussen T.F. Sahli Construction Liberty Park Skate Park CAG-03-002 FINAL ESTIMATE NO. 3 1. CONTRACTOR EARNINGS THIS ESTIMATE $5,440.00 2. SALES TAX @ 8.8% $478.72 3. TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT THIS ESTIMATE $5,918.72 4. EARNINGS PREVIOUSLY PAID CONTRACTOR 5. * EARNINGS DUE CONTRACTOR THIS ESTIMATE 6. SUBTOTAL - CONTRACTOR PAYMENT 7. RETAINAGE ON PREVIOUS EARNINGS 8. ** RETAINAGE ON EARNINGS THIS ESTIMATE 9. SUBTOTAL - RETAINAGE 10. SALES TAX PREVIOUSLY PAID 11. SALES TAX DUE THIS ESTIMATE 2. SUBTOTAL * (95% x Line 1) ** (RETAINAGE @ 5%) GRAND TOTAL FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTION PAYMENT TO CONTRACTOR (LINES 5 AND 11) Account RETAINED AMOUNT (LINE 8) Account TOTAL THIS ESTIMATE: CHARTER 116, LAWS OF 1965 $56, 833.75 $5,168.00 $2,991.26 $272.00 $5,264.60 $478.72 $62,001.75 $3,263.26 $5, 743.32 $71,008.33 No. 3 $5,646.72 No. 3 $272.00 I, THE UNDERSIGNED DO HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, THAT THE MATERIALS HAVE BEEN FURNISHED, THE SERVICES RENDERED OR THE LABOR PERFORMED AS DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND THAT THE CLAIM IS A JUST, DUE AND UNPAID OBLIGATION AGAINST THE CITY OF RENTON, AND THAT I AM A11THORIZED TO AUTHENTICATE AND CERTIFY TO SAID CLAIM. SIGNED: Ut.'d $5,918.72 APPtCATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR IWMENT TO OWNER: City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 FROM CONTRACTOR: T.F. Sahli Construction P.O. Box 332 Seahurst, WA 98062 PROJECT: Libery Park Skate Park Revisions VIA ARCHITECT: Gray & Osborne, Inc. 701 Dexter Ave N., Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98109 CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT Application is made for payment, as shown below, in connection with the Contract.. Continuation Sheet is attached. 1. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM .................................. $ 59,825.00 2. Net change by Change Orders .............................. 3. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE .................................... (Line 1 + or - Line 2) 4. TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE .......... 5. RETAINAGE AT 5%..................................................... (Based on line 4) 6. TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE .......................... (Line 4 less Line 5) 7. LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT.... (Line 6 from prior Certificate) 8. SUBTOTAL............................................................... (Line 6 less Line 7) 9. Washington State Sales Tax at 8.8...................... (Based on line 4 less prior certificate's line 4) 10. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE .......................................... (Line 8 plus Line 9) 11. BALANCE TO FINISH, INCLUDING RETAINAGE...... (Line 3 less Line 6) $ 5,440.00 $ 65,265.00 $ 65,265.00 APPLICATION NO.: 3 PERIOD TO: PROJECT NO.: CAG-03-002 City 04enton Distribution to OWNER ARCHITECT CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS Change Orders approved in previous months by owner $ - $ - C.O.'s approved this month Number Date Approved TOTALS $ - $ Net changes by Change Orders $ - $ 3,263.25 The undersigned Contractor certifies that to the best of the Contractor's knowledge, infor- mation and belief the Work covered by this Application for Payment has been completed $ 62,001.75 in accordance with the Contract Documents, that all amounts have been paid by the Contractor for Work for which previous Certificates for Payment were issued and payment $ 56,833.75 received from the Owner, and that current payment shown herein is now due. $ 5,168.00 * CONTRACTOR %�� CM'W 1 By: c�-,.�n. , Date: S $ 478.72 5,646.72 $ 3,263.25 ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT In accordance with the Contract Documents, based on on -site observations and the data comprising the above application, the Architect certifies to the Owner that to the best of the Architect's knowledge, information and belief the Work has progressed as indicated, the quality of the Work is in accordance with the Contract Documents, and the Contractor is entitled to payment of the AMOUNT CERTIFIED State of : Washington, County of: King Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of Notary Public: My Commission expires: AMOUNT CERTIFIED .................................................... (Attach explanation if amount certified differsfrom amount applied for.) ARCHITECT: By: Date: This Certificate is not negotiable. The AMOUNT CERTIFIED is payable only to the Contractor named herein. Issuance, payment and acceptance of payment are without prejudice to any rights of the Owner or Contractor under this Contract. T.F. SAHLI CONSTRUCTION P.O. Box 332 Seahurst, Washington 98062 Telephone: (206) 248-0580 STATEMENT NAME DATE: ryU ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: 1, Q-- ZIP: -/ 9 O S S— RE: 420MIL lev t S t G) S �lnc,ccCjti-pS DESCRIPTION TERMS: Payment due on receipt of invoice. 1-11/2% per month on all Past Due Invoices. AMOUNT Sub Total: ,r' � °� Tax @1&-0/- 7 ?Z Tota �jr'9 � � 7 x CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Al N: _ Submitting Data: For Agenda of: August 4, 2003 Dept/Div/Board.. Community Services/Parks Division Agenda Status Staff Contact...... Bill Rasmussen Capital Project Coordinator (ext. 6617) Consent .............. X Public Hearing.. Subject: Highlands Park Irrigation - CAG-02-148 Correspondence.. Ordinance ............. Resolution............ Old Business........ New Business....... Exhibits: Notice of Completion of Public Works Contract Study Sessions...... Copy of Final Pay Estimate Information......... Copy of Application and Certificate of Payment Copy of letter from architect accepting completion of project Recommended Action: Approvals: Council Concur Legal Dept......... Finance Dept...... Other ............... Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... $3,274.89 Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted.......... $94,700.00 Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget $94,700.00 City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The installation of an irrigation system at Highlands Park has been completed in accordance with contract documents. The project had $12,680.64 in change orders. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Council accept the project, and authorize the release of retainage in the amount of $3,274.89 upon receipt of all required releases. 2003-156aa State of Washington /�- Department hi Revenue PO Box 47474 REVENUE Olympia WA 98504-7474 Contractor's Registration No. (UBI No.) From Date NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT City of Renton Tracy Schuld 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 ,� � `` a � De atment else On1 � Assigned To Date Assigned Notice is hereby given relative to the completion of contract or project described below Description of Contract Contract Number Installation of irrigation system at Highlands Pk CAG-02-148 Contractor's Name Telephone Number Mr. Irrigation 253-405-1759 Contractor's Address 3620 54th Ave. E, Tacoma, WA 98424 Date Work Commenced Date Work Completed Date Work Accepted 11 /3/03 4/30/03 5/6/03 Surety or Bonding Company Western Surety Company ;ent's Address S. Goebel, Sioux Falls, South Dakota Contract Amount $ 53,842.65 Additions $ + 11,655.05 Reductions $ — 0.00 Sub -Total $ 65,497.70 Amount of Sales Tax Paid at 8.8 % $ 5,763.80 (If various rates apply, please send a breakdown) TOTAL $ 71,261.50 Comments: Signature Liquidated Damages $ 0.00 Amount Disbursed $ 67,986.61 Amount Retained $ 3,274.89 Type or Print Name Tracy Schuld Phone Number 425-430-6918 TOTAL $ 71,261.50 The Disbursing Officer must complete and mail THREE copies of this notice to the Department of Revenue, PO Box 47474, Olympia, WA 98504-7474, immediately after acceptance of the work done under this contract. NO YMENT SHALL BE MADE FROM RETAINED FUNDS until receipt of Department's certificate, and then only in .;ordance with said certificate. To inquire about the availability of this document in an alternate format for the visually impaired, please call (360) 753-3217. Teletype (TTY) users please call (800) 451-7985. You may also access tax information on our Internet home page at http://dor.wa.(,ov. REV 31 0020e (6-27-01) DATE: July 17, 2003 TO: Tracy Schuld copv FROM: Bill Rasmussen ;ONTRACTOR: Mr. Irrigation PROJECT NAME: Highlands Park Irrigation Project CONTRACT NO.: CAG-02-148 (FINAL) ESTIMATE NO. 4 1. CONTRACTOR EARNINGS THIS ESTIMATE $5,621.47 2. SALES TAX @ 8.8% $494.69 3. TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT THIS ESTIMATE $6,116.16 4. EARNINGS PREVIOUSLY PAID CONTRACTOR $56,882.41 5. * EARNINGS DUE CONTRACTOR THIS ESTIMATE $5,340.40 6. SUBTOTAL - CONTRACTOR PAYMENT $62,222.81 7. RETAINAGE ON PREVIOUS EARNINGS $2,993.82 8. ** RETAINAGE ON EARNINGS THIS ESTIMATE $281.07 9. SUBTOTAL - RETAINAGE $3,274.89 10. SALES TAX PREVIOUSLY PAID $5,269.11 11. SALES TAX DUE THIS ESTIMATE $494.69 2. SUBTOTAL $5,763.80 * (95% x Line 1) (RETAINAGE @ 5% GRAND TOTAL $71,261.50 FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTION PAYMENT TO CONTRACTOR (LINES 5 AND 11) No. 4 $5,835.09 Account 316.000000.020.5940.0076.63.000001 RETAINED AMOUNT (LINE 8) No. 4 $281.07 Account 316.000000.020.5940.0076.63.000001 TOTAL THIS ESTIMATE: $6,116.16 CHARTER 116, LAWS OF 1965 I, THE UNDERSIGNED DO HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, THAT THE MATERIALS HAVE BEEN FURNISHED, THE SERVICES RENDERED OR THE LABOR PERFORMED AS DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND THAT THE CLAIM IS A JUST, DUE AND UNPAID OBLIGATION AGAINST THE CITY OF RENTON, AND THAT I AM AUTHORIZED TO AUTHENTICATE AND CERTIFY TO SAID CLAIM. GNED: `�� APACATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR $VYMENT City o$kenton TO OWNER: City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 FROM CONTRACTOR: Mr. Irrigation 3620 54th Ave E Tacoma, WA 98424 PROJECT: Highlands Park Irrigation Project VIA ARCHITECT: Edlund Associates 15005 SE 171st St. Renton, WA 98058 CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT Application is made for payment, as shown below, in connection with the Contract. Continuation Sheet is attached. 1. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM .................................. $ 53,842.65 2. Net change by Change Orders ................ 3. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE ......................... (Line 1 + or - Line 2) 4. TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE $ 11,655.05 ... • ......... $ 65,497.70 $ 65,497.70 APPLICATION NO.: 4 PERIOD TO: JUNE 19,2003 PROJECT NO.: CAG-02-148 Distribution to OWNER ARCHITECT CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS Change Orders approved in previous months by owner $ $ _ C.O.'s approved this month Number Date Approved TOTALS -changes $ [Net by Change Orders 1 $ - 5. RETAINAGE AT 5%..................................................... $ 3,274.89 The undersigned Contractor certifies that to the best of the Contractor's knowledge, infor- (Based on line 4) mation and belief the Work covered by this Application for Payment has been completed 6. TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE .......................... $ 62,222.81 in accordance with the Contract Documents, that all amounts have been paid by the (Line 4 less Line 5) Contractor for Work for which previous Certificates for Payment were issued and payment 7. LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT.... $ 56,882.41 received from the Owner, and that current payment shown herein is now due. (Line 6 from prior Certificate) 8. SUBTOTAL............................................................... $ 5,340.40 * CONT R 9. (Line 6 less Line 7) Washington State Sales Tax 8.8 B r J Date: at ...................... $ 494.69 (Based on line 4 less prior certificate's line 4) State of : Washington, County of: King 10. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE .......................................... $ 5,835.09 Subscribed and sworn to before me (Line 8 plus Line 9) this day of ,19_ 11. BALANCE TO FINISH, INCLUDING RETAINAGE...... $ 3,274.89 Notary Public: (Line 3 less Line 6) My Commission expires: ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT In accordance with the Contract Documents, based on on -site observations and the data comprising the above application, the Architect certifies to the Owner that to the best of the Architect's knowledge, information and belief the Work has progressed as indicated, the quality of the Work is in accordance with the Contract Documents, and the Contractor is entitled to payment of the AMOUNT CERTIFIED. AMOUNT CERTIFIED .................................................... (41tach explanation if amount certified d fers from amount applied for.) ARCHITECT: By: Date: This Certificate is not negotiable. The AMOUNT CERTIFIED is payable only to the Contractor named herein. Issuance, payment and acceptance of payment are without prejudice to any rights of the Owner or Contractor under this Contract. Edlund A S S O C I A T E S I N C Landscape Architecture Bill Rasmussen Capital Improvements Coordinator Renton City Hall 1055 South Grady Way- 5th Floor Renton, WA 98055 May 6, 2003 Re: Highlands Park Irrigation Contract Dear Bill: I have reviewed the Highlands Park Irrigation Contract Installation performed by Mr. Irrigation. In my professional opinion he has satisfactorily completed the work described in the Contract Documents. I recommend that payment by made subject to the conditions specified in the Contract under the warrantee period. Sincerely, Gerry Edlund, ASLA Edlund Associates, inc. Planning 0 Corisvucdon ❑ Grounds Mai ntenance❑ 15005 SE 171st St ❑ PO Box 58099 0 Renton, WA 98058 C Phone (425)255-5726 0 Fax (425)255-4270 0 EDLUNA'201K7 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBMITTING DATA: Dept/Div/Board..... Community Services / Facilities Staff Contact........ Tracy Coleman, Ext. 6623 SUBJECT: CAG-02-177 Fire Station No. 12 E. Kent Halvorson, Inc. General Contractor EXHIBITS: Cost To Complete Analysis for FS #12 Issue Paper RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Committee of the Whole Al11 #: 7. /t FOR AGENDA OF: August 4, 2003 AGENDA STATUS: Consent ................................. Public Hearing ....................... Correspondence .................... Ordinance .............................. Resolution ............................. Old Business ......................... New Business ........................ Study Session ....................... Information ............................ Other..................................... APPROVALS: Legal Dept .................. Finance Dept .............. X Other.......................... FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required ............. $6,018,770 Transfer/Amendment........ Amount Budgeted .................. $5,134,639 Revenue Generated ......... SUMMARY OF ACTION: On April 22, 2003, the Fire Station Contractor was removed from the project for falsifying his performance bond. On May 22, 2003, E. Kent Halvorson Inc. was hired to complete the work and was initially given authorization to spend up to $1,929,324. Now that a firm understanding of the cost of the remaining work is known, the Administration requests authorization to amend the Halvorson contract by adding $1,067,909.00 to complete the construction of Fire Station No. 12. The total Halvorson contract with this amendment becomes $2,997,233.00. This change authorization requires the use of the remaining funds in the original appropriation ($4,999,000) plus an additional new appropriation of $884,131.00. Five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) of this new appropriation is due to an administrative oversight in carrying forward the correct amount in the 2002 CIP and the remainder ($384,131) is due to cost increases for replacing the original General Contractor. This new appropriation is proposed to come from the Fire Mitigation Fund. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Administration to allow E. Kent Halvorson, Inc. to pay subcontractors for work done through March 2003, totaling $87,257.52. Authorize the Administration to issue a change order and amend the original contract amount of $1,929,324.73 for E. Kent Halvorson's Cost Plus Contract by adding $1,067,907.85 including sales tax, bringing the Halvorson contract to $2,997,232.58. Authorize an additional appropriation of $884,131 to cover the increased costs of completing the Fire Station ($384,131) and to cover the appropriation adjustment that should have been made in 2002 ($500,000). rev. 8/13/93 AGENDA Bill Halvorson CO.DOC MEMORANDUM CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY SERVICES 0 Committed to Enriching Lives 0 DATE: July 28, 2003 TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Copncil President Renton City Councilme rs VIA: Mayor Jesse Tanner / FROM: Dennis Culp, Comm nit ervices AdministratorrILS Victoria Runkle, Finances nd IS Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Tracy Coleman, Ext. 6623 SUBJECT: Fire Station No. 12 — E. Kent Halvorson, Inc. Contract Revision ISSUES: • Should the City of Renton pay subcontractors on the Fire Station #12 project the amounts past due that Granquist Construction Company neglected to pay? • Should the City of Renton increase E. Kent Halvorson, Inc. contract to the amount of $2,997,232.58? • Should the City Council authorize an additional appropriation of $884,131 to provide sufficient funds to complete the fire station? RECOMMENDATION: • Authorize the Administration to allow E. Kent Halvorson, Inc. to pay subcontractors for work done through March 2003, totaling $87,257.52. This will be a duplicate payment for the City of Renton since we paid Granquist but he did not pay the sub -contractors for work already performed. • Authorize the Administration to issue a change order and amend the original contract amount of $1,929,324.73 for E. Kent Halvorson's Cost Plus Contract by adding $1,067,907.85 (includes WSST). This will bring the Halvorson Contract to $2,997,232.58 • Authorize an additional appropriation of $884,131.00 to cover the increased costs of completing the Fire Station ($384,131.00) and to cover the appropriation adjustment that should have been made in 2002 ($500,000). BACKGROUND SUMMARY • On April 22, 2003, the Granquist Construction contract was terminated because of their submittal of a fraudulent performance bond. • By emergency action the Council authorized the Administration to waive the bidding rules and seek contract proposals from qualified firms. E. Kent Halvorson Inc. (EKHI) provided the lowest fee proposal and was chosen to complete the project. • EKHI was initially funded at $1,929.324 to do the work. Subsequent cost studies by EKHI and city staff concluded that the remaining work, plus payment for services needed by EKHI but already paid to Granquist, required additional funds in the amount of $1,067,907.85. The spreadsheet, attached at Tab A, provides the cost details. • Part of the additional funds in the EKHI Contract Amendment are owed to subcontractors who were not paid by Granquist even though Granquist was paid for the work by the City. The Administration proposes to pay the subcontractors the amount of money due for work performed. It is in the best interest of the City of Renton to pay the contractors. They are doing excellent work and had no part in the alleged fraud by Granquist. • In 2002 the Fire Station project budget was set at $5,500,000 with funds coming from the purchase of bonds for construction and the use of fire mitigation funds. The actual request to Council however only requested $4,999,000 due to an administrative oversight in carrying forward the correct amount. Tab B explains the discrepancy. • With only $4,999,000 appropriated to construct the fire station there was a shortfall of $500,000 in the project budget in addition to the increased costs ($384,131) to change General Contractors. • With the new appropriation, the Administration will have $230,466 in contingency funds in case unforeseen changes surface. These funds will not be spent unless the change is necessary for the successful completion of the building. • One hundred thirty-five thousand six -hundred thirty-nine dollars ($135,639.00) was budgeted in the communication technology budget (Fund 316) to provide the phone system, fiber, and wiring for the project. This was intentionally kept in the technology budget to insure the proper integration of voice, fiber, and phone hardware with the rest of the city system and with the emergency operations requirements. This part will be handled by separate contract under the guidance of the IS Director. The separate contract will be brought forward for Council approval once a vendor selection is made. • The Fire Mitigation Fund was used to finance the bonds needed to provide the construction dollars for the project. City funds were used to finance the land acquisition, design and management costs. Technology funds are used to finance the phone and data requirements. Funds are available in the Fire Mitigation Fund to finance the $884,131.00 additional appropriation. CONCLUSION The City of Renton should pay subcontractors the past due amounts because it is in the City's best interest to do so. The E. Kent Halvorson contract should be amended to add $2,997,233 in order to finish construction of Fire Station #12. In order to fund this contract amendment, the Administration proposes to use the remaining funds of the original appropriation and to provide the additional funds needed ($884,131.00) from the Fire Mitigation Fund. I:$: COST TO COMPLETE ANALYSIS FOR FIRE STATION NO. 12 CONSTRUCTION COSTS TO COMPLETE Granquist Co. 12/02 EKHI 5/03 Variance Original Construction Contract $ 3,112,155 Construction $ Spent ($870,497) $ - Cost to complete $ 2,241,658 $ 2,997,233 ($755,575) $71,050 Granquist Omissions from Contract $87,258 Change Order - Duplicate Payment to Subcontractors _ $22,264 Granquist over billing of subs work _ $42,668 Change Order - Estimated Value of Remaining Chan e Orders $33,245 EKHI Liabili Insurance $12,598 EKHI B&O Tax $12 EKHI Builder's Risk Insurance $20,397 EKHI Bond Amount $191,221 EKHI Fee _ $37,088 EKHI State Sales Tax on Contract above Granquist Tax on Contract $172,600 Contract Costs - Labor & Installation $65,174 Contract Costs - Equipment & Misc. Costs CITY PROJECT FUNDS REQUIRED TO COMPLETE Original Funds Spent to Date Remaining Furnishings $ 79,550 $ - $ 79,550 Equipment $ 700 $ - $ 700 Information Systems $ 38,000 $ (9,000) $ 29,000 1%Arts $ 28,604 $ (28,604) $ - Architectural & Engineering Svs $ 426,000 $ (361,000) $ 65,000 Testing and Inspection Services $ 38,103 $ (20,397) $ 17,706 Permits, Utilities, Connections $ 125,000 $ (20,88ZI 1 $ 104,113 Approved authorization Additional authorization requirec $1,929,324 $1,067,909 $ 735,957 $ (439,889) $ 296,068 Total authorization to complete Fire Station $2,997,233 PROJECT FUNDS REQUIRED TO COMPLETE Original Appropriated amount $ 4,999,000 Avail. Funds 7-16-03 $ 2,639,636 Total cost of fire station #12 Construction $ 5,883,131 $ Spent to date EKHI Contract $ 2,997,233 _ Cost of communications package (from 316 fund 1 $135,639 Contract $ 870,497) City Project Funds $ 296,068 City Project Funds $ (439,889) Contingency $ 230,466 Project Total $ 6,018,770 Land/pre-develop $ (1,021,442) New Appropriation Needed $ (884,131) Contingency $ 27,536 Avail Funds 7-16-03 $ 2,639,636 7am TAB B FIRE STATION 12 FUNDS RECONCILIATION The Spring, 2003 Carry Forward Ordinance reappropriating cash from 2002 to 2003 did not appropriate all the monies remaining from the bond proceeds. In the summer of 2002 we sold bonds for $3.8 million. (Note 1 on the Attachment). After debt costs, we had $3,815,000 dedicated from the bonds for the construction costs of FS 12. (Note 2 on the Attachment). Also in 2002 we had $500,000 (Note 3) dedicated for the design of Fire Station 12. Thus the total appropriation was $4,315, 000, plus the debt issuance costs ($80,000). This equated to an appropriation authority of $4,395,000 (Note 4). We actually spent $694,316 in 2002. Thus, our actual carry forward request should have been $4,395,000 - $694,316 = $3,700,684. Unfortunately it was for $3,336,800. (Note 5) Staff, unfortunately, subbed the $552,127 expenditure from the bond proceeds of $3,815,000, leaving a balance of $3,336,800. This was incorrect. The budget clearly demonstrates the project was to cost $3,815,000 plus an additional $500,000 from fund balance for a total of $4,315,000. This change will restore the total budget to $5.5 million as originally approved. The issue paper before you corrects this mistake, and makes the project costs whole for the entire amount required for the project. We will make the accounting records match this with a follow up ordinance in the next couple of weeks. Expenditures - 304 FIRE IMPACT MITIGATION 2001 2002 2002 2003 2003 Account Number Account Title Actual Adj Bdgt Actual Orig Bdgt Adj Bdgt Expenditures ENDING FUND BALANCE 304.000000.000.5080.0000.00.000000 ENDING FUND BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 ENDING FUND BALANCE TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 TRANSFER OUT OPERATING TRANSFERS -OUT TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 •" Title Not Found "' 304.000000.009.5920.0022.84.000000 DEBT ISSUE COSTS/2002 LTGO FIRE ST 12 0 80,000 73,487 0 0 DEBT SERVICE: INTEREST 0 80,000 73,487 0 0 INTEREST & OTHR DEBT SVC COSTS TOTAL 0 80,000 73,487 0 0 VALLEY FIRE STATION NO. 14 304.000000.009.5940.0022.10.000000 SALARIES AND WAGES 21,869 0 44,409 0 0 SALARIES AND WAGES 21,869 0 44,409 0 0 304.000000.009.5940.0022.20.000001 RETIREMENT/WPERS 387 0 649 0 0 304.000000.009.5940.0022.20.000003 FICA 1,673 0 3,397 0 0 304.000000.009.5940.0022.20.000004 PREPAID MEDICAL 2,260 0 6,175 0 0 304.000000.009.5940.0022.20.000006 INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE 82 0 182 0 0 304.000000.009.5940.0022.20.000007 LIFE INSURANCE iii 0 203 0 0 304.000000.009.5940.0022.20.000009 PREPAID DENTAL 521 0 1,512 0 0 304.000000.009.5940.0022.20.000070 LONG TERM DISABILITY 55 0 245 0 0 PERSONNEL BENEFITS 5,090 0 12,365 0 0 304.000000.009.5940.0022.31.000000 OFFICE/OPERATING SUPPLIES 282 0 880 0 0 SUPPLIES 282 0 880 0 0 304.000000.009.5940.0022.41.019001 FIRE STATION 15-PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 0 0 11,243 0 0 OTHER SERVICES AND CHARGES 304.000000.009.5940.0022.62.019001 STATION 15 304.000000.009.5940.0022.62.019012 STATION 12 304.000000.009.5940.0022.64.019002 FIRE MAJOR FLEET EQUIP PLAN 304.000000.009.5940.0022.65.019012 STATION 12 DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION CAPITAL OUTLAYS CAPITALIZED EXPENDITURES TOTAL CR1698 FIRE EO-OPR TRFS OUT 304.000000.009.5970.0022.00.000000 TRANSFER OUT TO 215 0 0 11,243 0 0 903,635 0 ��, -195 0 i 982,458 3,815,000 0 0 3,336,80 -2,538 t 0 0 0 44,394 500,000 552,127 0 0 1,927,949 4,315,000 551,932 0 3,336,800 1,955,189 4,315,000 626,829 0 3,336,800 0 0 0 298,000 298,000 INTERFD REIMBURSMTS/EXP CREDIT 0 0 0 OPERATING TRANSFERS -OUT TOTAL 0 0 0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES - FUND 304 FIRE IMPACT MITIGATION 1,955,189 4,395,000 694,316 41 F Tr ul CIL 74 2003 Budget Detail Capital Project Page 6 of 23 298,000 298,000 298,000 298,000 298,000 3,634,800 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL [TIT T I' . Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: August 4, 2003 Dept/Div/Board.. Development Services Division Staff Contact...... Carrie K. Olson x7235 Agenda Status Consent .............. X Public Hearing.. Subject: Acceptance of additional right-of-way to comply with Correspondence.. Ordinance ............. City of Renton code for new short plats. Resolution............ Old Business........ New Business....... Exhibits: Deed of Dedication Study Sessions...... Exhibit Map Vicinity Map Information......... Administrative Short Plat Report & Decision Recommended Action: Approvals: Council concur Legal Dept......... X Finance Dept...... Other. .. Fiscal Impact: N/A Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget City Share Total Project. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The area to be dedicated for additional right-of-way is a 6' strip of land along South Tillicum Street. The dedication is a City of Renton code requirement of the Amrik Singh Short Plat, LUA-03-027, and Council acceptance of said right-of-way should be completed prior to recording deed with the short plat. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Deed of Dedication. CADocuments and Settings\mpetersen\Local Settings\TempWmrik SinghSHPL 03 AGNBILL.doc Relurn Address.• City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055-3232 DEED OF DEDICATION Property Tax Parcel Number: Project File 8: 1-U ,a3-Oa. Street Intersection: S, ! i 111 Gum Reference tYumbcr(s) of Documents assigned or released. Additional retcrtne4 numbers are on page G ra n to r(s): Grantte(s): I . AM►Z A S i �l914 I. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporatii LEGAL DESCRIPTION. (Abbreviated or full legal must go here. Additional legal on page A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18,TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE S EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. t he grantor, for and in consideration of mutual benefits conveys, quit claims, dedicates and donates to the Grantees) as named above, the above described real estate situated in the County of King, State of Washington. This dedication is required as a condition for development of property. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. ryNN1vYCu anu Acceptea tsy: Grantor(s)- INDIVIDUAL FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box DEED Grantee(s): City of Renton Mayor City Clerk STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that AyvIY 1 iK 51 rio(,, signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and puiposcs mentioned in the instrument. Notary Public in and for the State of Washin ton t Notary (Print)��ey,ot►ro► My appointment expires: — 9— Dated: -4g 1 C- Exhibit A WO# Legal Description PID GRANTOR: Strut: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18,TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHTNGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; BEGINNING AT THE MONUMENT IN CASE AT THE INTERSECTION OF SHATTUCK AVENUE SOUTH AND SOUTH TILLICUM STREET; THENCE S 87°14'42"E, ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF SAID SOUTH TILLICUM STREET, A DISTANCE OF 165.45 FEET; THENCE N 01 °53'46"E 9.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING N 01°53'46"E 6.00 FEET; THENCE S 87014'42"E 36.06 FEET; THENCE S 01°56'5T'W 6.00 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS S 87°14'42"E FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N 87914'42"W 36.06 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 216 S.F. DEED.DOC O9��oe WAs�� �J f v ° 2i4W t EXPIRES 149o4 Pagc 2 1, ap I6' ADDITIONAL RIGHT -OF -WAY - TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF RENTON UPON RECORDING OF THIS SHORT PLAT. (216 SF--) L S. TILLICUM ST is i za J O I Z I O N Q �O { LOT z Z� W V uj w w z J J m \ Z x 2 w V vs 1 � z F" w Z LOT 1 i J i Z r�� 2 ExIST HOUSE r 3 w . Q coNC WALK TOBIN_ STREET DEED.DOC Pagc REPORT (gc DECISION City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ADMINISTRATIVE SHORT PLAT REPORT & DECISION A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST. REPORT DATE: April 7, 2003 Project Name Amrik Singh Short Plat Owner/Applicant: Amrik Singh 10412 SE 186'h Place Renton, WA 98055 Contact: Darrell Harwood 2431 S. 248'h # G36 Kent, WA 98032 File Number LUA-03-027, SHPL-A Project Manager Susan Fiala Project Description Administrative Land Use Action (Short Plat Review) for the two -lot subdivision of a 0.38- acre site located in the Residential — 8 Dwelling Unit Per Acre (R-8) Zone. A single family home currently exists on the subject site and will remain on new Lot 1. Project Location: 312 South Tobin Street tJort�, Project Location Map shplrpt Singh.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department . " Administrative Land Use Action REPORT AND DECISION DATED April 7, 2003; PROJECT LUA-03-027, SHPL-A page 2 B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. 2. 3. 4. Owner of Record. Zoning Designation: Amrik Singh 10412 SE 186`h Place Renton, WA 98055 Residential — 8 du/ac (R-8) Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: Residential Single Family (RSF) Existing Site Use: The site has single family residence proposed to remain on new Lot 1. 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Commercial (CA zone) East: Single Family Residential (R-8 zone) South: Renton High School (CD-P zone) West: Single Family Residential (R-8 zone) 6. Access: Via South Tillicum and South Tobin Streets 7. Site Area: 16,727 square feet / 0.38 acres C. HISTORICAUBACKGROUND: Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date Comprehensive Plan N/A 4498 02/20/1995 Zoning N/A 4404 06/07/1993 Original Incorporation N/A N/A 1901 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities Water: This site is in the 196 Water Pressure Zone. There is a 12" watermain in South Tobin St. See City of Renton water drawing W0020 for detailed information. There is an existing 8" watermain in Shattuck Ave. South, see City of Renton water drawing W940 for detailed information. The static pressure at the street level is approximately 65 psi. Sewer: There is an existing 15" sanitary sewer main in South Tobin St. There is an existing 8" sanitary sewer main in South Tillicum St. The City does not have any records of the location of the existing sidesewer. Surface Water/Storm Water: There are existing storm drainage facilities in the area. 2. Streets: There are curbs, gutter and sidewalk along South Tobin Street. No improvements exist along South Tillicum Street. 3. Fire Protection: City of Renton Fire Department E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts Section 4-2-070: Zoning Use Table Section 4-2-110: Residential Development Standards 2. Chapter 4 Property Development Standards Section 4-4-030: Development Guidelines and Regulations 3. Chapter 6 Streets and Utility Standards Section 4-6-060: Street Standards 4. Chapter 7 Subdivision Regulations shplrpt Singh. doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action REPORT AND DECISION DATED April 7, 2003; PROJECT LUA-03-027, SHPL-A Page 3 Section 4-7-070: Detailed Procedures for Short Subdivisions Section 4-7-120: Compatibility with Existing Land Use and Plan -General Requirements and Minimum Standards Section 4-7-150: Streets -General Requirements and Minimum Standards Section 4-7-170: Residential Lots -General Requirements and Minimum Standards 5. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Land Use Element — Residential Single Family 2. Housing Element G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. Project Description/Background The applicant, Amrik Singh, proposes to subdivide a 0.38-acre (16,727 square feet) parcel into two lots. The property currently contains a 1,580 square foot single family residence which will remain on new Lot 1. Lot sizes proposed are: Lot 1 at 8,701 square feet and Lot 2 at 7,810 square feet. The proposal for eventual development of single family residences on the two new lots would arrive at a density of 5.26 dwelling units per net acre (du/ac). The allowed density range in the R-8 zone is a minimum of 5.0 to a maximum of 9.7 dwelling units per acre for lots one-half an acre or less in net size. New Lot 1, would continue to gain access directly to South Tobin Street and new Lot 2 would be accessed via South Tillicum Street. Six feet of right-of-way (216 sq. ft.) would be dedicated to the City of Renton for South Tillicum Street. The topography of the subject site has little to no slope. The site is located in a High Seismic Hazard are, based on the City's Critical Areas' maps. 2. Environmental Review Except when located on lands covered by water or sensitive areas, short plats are exempt from SEPA Environmental Review pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(6)(a). 3. Compliance with ERC Conditions N/A 4. Staff Review Comments Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address issues raised by the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. 5. Consistency Short Plat Criteria Approval of a plat is based upon several factors. The following short plat criteria have been established to assist decision -makers in the review of the plat: a) Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan Designation The site is designated Residential Single Family (RSF) on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The RSF designation is intended to promote and enhance single family neighborhoods. The proposal is consistent with the RSF designation in that it would allow for the future construction of new single family homes, thereby promoting goals of infill development. The proposal is consistent with the following Comprehensive Plan Land Use and Housing Element policies: Policy LU-34. Net development densities should fall within a range of 5 to 8 dwelling units per acre in Residential Single Family neighborhoods. The proposed project for two lots would arrive at a net density of 5.26 dwelling units per net acre which is within the allowable range for parcels smaller than one half acre which permits density up to 9.7 dwelling units per acre. shplrpt Singh.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action REPORT AND DECISION DATED April 7, 2003; PROJECT LUA-03-027, SHPL-A Page 4 Policy LU-35. A minimum lot size of 4,500 square feet should be allowed in single family residential neighborhoods except when flexible development standards are used for project review. Both lots exceed the minimum lot size of which the smaller lot is 7,810 square feet. Policy LU-36. Allow development at 9.7 dwelling units per acre on infill parcels of one acre or less as an incentive to encourage single family small lot development on 4,500 sq. ft. lots. The proposed short plat would be located on a site that is less than one-half acre and would have a density of 5.26 dwelling units per acre. Policy H-4. Encourage infill development as a means to increase capacity. The proposal would create one additional lot, thereby slightly increasing density within a currently developed residential area. b) Compliance with the Underlying Zoning Designation The subject site is designated Residential — 8 Dwelling Units per Acre (R-8) on the City of Renton . Zoning Map. The proposed development would allow for the future construction of one new single family dwelling unit. The allowed density range in the R-8 zone is a minimum of 5.0 to a maximum of 9.7 dwelling units per acre for lots one-half an acre or less in net size. Net density is calculated after the deduction of sensitive areas, areas intended for public right-of-way and private easements serving three lots or more from the gross acreage of the site. The property does not contain any sensitive areas nor areas required for right-of-way dedication. There would be 216 square feet dedicated to the right- of-way for South Tillicum Street; however, deductions from gross acreage only occurs for plats of three lots or more. Based on two lots, net density would arrive at 5.26 dwelling units per acre, which is within the allowed range for parcels less than one-half acre. The allowed building lot coverage in the R-8 zone is 35 percent or 2,500 square feet whichever is greater for lots over 5,000 square feet in size and lots 5,000 square feet or less are allowed a maximum of 50% lot coverage. New Lot 1 where the existing single family residence would remain has a lot coverage of 18.2% which complies with the development standard. Setbacks in the R-8 zone are as follows: front yard is 20 feet, side yard is 5 feet, side yard along a street is 15 feet and the rear yard is 20 feet. Based on the proposed subdivision, new Lot 1 would maintain its front yard facing toward South Tobin Street. New Lot 2 meets all required yard setbacks and provides adequate buildable area. Each lot would have adequate area to provide two off-street parking spaces as required by the parking regulations. The R-8 zone permits accessory structures only when associated with a primary structure located on the same parcel. No outbuildings currently exist on the site. c) Compliance with Subdivision Regulations Streets: No new public streets would be created as part of the proposed short plat. The dedication of six feet of right-of-way (approximately 216 square feet) to South Tillicum Street is required. The dedication of property for public right-of-way requires City Council approval. A separate. recorded document is required for the dedication. The applicant is encouraged to begin the deed of dedication process to prevent any delays. South Tillicum Street is an unimproved public right-of-way. There are no street improvements on South Tillicum Street (alley). The Subdivision Regulations require the installation of street improvements, including curb, gutter, and sidewalk, and provide half pavement width per the standards plus a minimum of 10 feet of pavement along the full frontages and alley of the parcel being developed (RMC section 4-6-060), unless previously installed, waived or deferred through the City of Renton Board of Public Works. The applicant has not yet requested a waiver or deferral. The proposed short plat is anticipated to generate additional traffic on the City's street system. In order to mitigate transportation impacts, staff recommends a condition of approval be placed on the project requiring a Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per net new average daily trip attributed to the project. The one new lot (credit given for the existing residence) is expected to generate approximately 9.57 new average weekday trips per lot. The fee for the proposed short shplrpt_Singh.doc City of Renton PiBIPW Department Administrative Land Use Action REPORT AND DECISION DATED April 7, 2003; PROJECT LUA-03-027, SHPL-A Page 5 plat is estimated at $717.75 ($75.00 x 9.57 trips x 1 lot = $717.75) and is payable prior to recording of the short plat. Blocks: No new blocks will be created as part of the proposed short plat. Lots: The minimum lot size permitted in the R-8 zone is 4,500 square feet. The proposed plat would create two lots, which are proposed as: Lot 1 at 8,701 square feet and Lot 2 at 7,810 square feet. The proposed lot sizes are compatible with other existing lots in this area under the same R-8 zoning classification. The proposed lots also comply with the R-8 requirements for minimum lot width (50 feet for interior lots and 60 feet for corner lots). The minimum lot depth of 65 feet is achieved by the two lots and thus complies with these development standards. The new lot appears to have adequate building area for the construction of a single-family residence when taking setbacks and lot coverage requirements into consideration. The size, orientation and arrangement of the proposed lots comply with the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations and the development standards of the R-8 zone. d) Reasonableness of Proposed Boundaries Access: Each lot would have direct access to a public right-of-way; new Lot 1 to South Tobin Street and new Lot 2 to South Tillicum Street. Topography. The topography of the site has little to no slopes. The site has minimal vegetation and consists of lawn a few trees and some blackberry bushes. The applicant submitted a geotechnical reconnaissance letter prepared by Earth Consultants, Inc., dated January 10, 2003. stated that the future residence can be supported on a conventional spread and continuous footing foundation system bearing on a minimum of two feet of structural fill. Based on the consultant's reconnaissance, construction techniques for future developmf (single family home) would adequately address the site's location within the seismic hazard area. Relationship to Existing Uses: The properties surrounding the subject site are designated Residential — 8 Dwelling Units Per Acre (R-8) on the City's zoning map. The proposal is similar to existing development patterns in the area and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code, which encourage residential infill development. e) Availability and Impact on Public Services (Timeliness) Police and Fire: Police and Fire Prevention staff indicate that sufficient resources exist to furnish services to the proposed development, subject to the condition that the applicant provide Code required improvements and fees. A Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $488.00 per new single family lot with credit given for the existing single family residence, is recommended in order to mitigate the proposal's potential impacts to City emergency services. The fee is estimated at $488.00 ($488.00 x 1 new unit = $488.00) and is payable prior to the recording of the short plat. Recreation: The proposal does not provide on -site recreation areas for future residents of the proposed short plat. The project would contribute to the demand for future new recreational facilities. This fee would go towards creating recreational facilities that may be utilized by future residents. Therefore, staff recommends that a Parks Mitigation Fee be required. A Parks Mitigation Fee of $530.76 per new single family lot is recommended prior to the recording of the short plat. Credit would be given for the existing single family residence. The fee is estimated at $530.76 ($530.76 x 1 new lot = $530.76) and is payable prior to the recording of the short plat. Schools: According to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the City of Renton Land Use Element (January 16, 1992), the City of Renton has a student generation factor of 0.44 students per single family residential dwelling. Based on the student generation factor, the proposed short plat would not even result in one additional student (0.44 X 1 = 0.44) to the local schools (Lakeridge Elementary, Dimmitt Middle School and Renton High School). However, it anticipated that the Renton School District can accommodate any additional students generateL. by this proposal. shplrpt Singh.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department - Administrative Land Use Action REPORT AND DECISION DATED April 7, 2003; PROJECT LUA-03-027, SHPL-A Page 6 Storm Water. There are storm drainage improvements fronting the site on South Tobin Street. A Level 1 .Drainage report, prepared by Medina Consulting Engineers, Inc. was submitted. An engineered plan showing an infiltration trench was submitted and appears to be in order. The System Development Charge will be at the current rate of $525.00 per new single family residence. Current charges would be for one lot x $525.00 per lot = $525.00 and is payable prior to the issuance of a construction permit. Water and Sanitary Sewer Utilities: An additional fire hydrant will be required to be installed. The existing fire hydrant is to be brought up to current code including stortz fittings. Water service stub(s) are required to be provided to each building lot prior to recording of the short plat. A system development charge of $1,105.00 per single family lot is required and payable at the time of issuance of the utility construction permit. A sanitary sewer main extension is not required to serve this plat. The applicant will need to show how the new lot will be served with sanitary sewer. Dual sidesewers are not allowed. The new lots must be served with individual sidesewers which must be installed prior to the recording of the short plat. A System Development Charge of $760.00 per each new lot is required. This fee is payable at the time of issuance of construction permits. H. Findings: Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: 1. Request: The applicant has requested Administrative Short Plat Approval for the Amrik Singh Short Plat, File No. LUA-03-027, SHPL-A. 2. Application: The applicant's short plat application complies with the requirements for information for short plat review. The applicant's short plat plan and other project drawings are contained within the official land use file. 3. Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designations of the Residential Single Family (RSF) land use designation. 4. Zoning: The proposal as presented complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the Residential Single Family - 8 (R-8) zoning designation, provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval are complied with. 5. Subdivision Regulations: The proposal complies with the requirements established by the City's Subdivision Regulations provided all advisory notes and conditions are complied with. 6. Existing Land Uses: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: Commercial (zoned CA); East: Residential Single Family (zoned R-8); South: Renton High School (zoned CD-P); and West: Residential Single Family (zoned R-8). 1. Conclusion: The subject site is located in the Residential Single Family (RSF) comprehensive plan designation and complies with the goals and policies established with this designation. 2. The subject site is located in the Residential — 8 Dwelling Units Per Acre zoning designation and complies with the zoning and development standards established with this designation provided all advisory notes and conditions are complied with. 3. The proposed two lot short plat complies with the subdivision regulations as established by city code and state law provided all advisory notes and conditions are complied with. 4. The proposed two lot short plat generally complies with the street standards as established by city code. shplrpt_Singh.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action REPORT AND DECISION DATED April 7, 2003; PROJECT LUA-03-027, SHPL-A Page 7 J. DECISION: The Amrik Singh Short Plat, File No. LUA-03-027, SHPL-A, is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall pay the required Transportation Mitigation Fee at the rate of $75.00 per net new average daily trip associated with the project. The Transportation Mitigation Fee shall be paid prior to the recording of the short plat. 2. The applicant shall pay the required Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $488.00 per new single family lot with credit given for the existing single family residence. The Fire Mitigation Fee shall be paid prior to the recording of the short plat. 3. The applicant shall pay the required Parks Mitigation Fee equal to $530.76 per new single family lot with credit given for the existing single family residence. The Parks Mitigation Fee shall be paid prior to the recording of the short plat. DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURES: _ffileej Gregg A. rman, P/B/PWAdministrator decision date ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions. Planning 1. The site is designated Residential Single Family in the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The property is zoned Residential 8 (R-8). Densities allowed in the R-8 Zone are 5.0 dwelling units per net acre (du/a) minimum and 9.7 du/a maximum for lots '/z acre or less. 3. Minimum lot size in the R-8 Zone is 4,500 square feet, with minimum width of 50 feet. The minimum permitted lot depth is 65 feet. 4. Heights of buildings in the R-8 Zone are limited to 2 stories, or 30 feet. 5. Required setbacks in the R-8 Zone are a 20-foot front yard, a 20-foot rear yard, a 15-foot side yard along a street and 5-foot interior side as measured from the property line to the nearest point of the structure. Setback dimensions should be shown on the construction drawings, but must be removed prior to recording the final short plat. 6. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received. 7. Commercial, multi -family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. Property Services 1. The dedication of property for street purposes (6' X 36.06') requires approval by the City Council. Said dedication is achieved via a separate recorded City of Renton Dedication Deed document. If the dedication is to be recorded with the short plat, the dedication process needs to be timed in such a way that Council approval and all other matters pertaining to the dedication have been taken care of, and said document is ready to record. The Deed of Dedication document includes both a legal description exhibit and a map exhibit. The legal description exhih should be prepared, stamped, dated and signed by the applicant's surveyor. The surveyor should also prepare the map exhibit. The dedication process requires an updated Plat Certificate, dated within 45 days of Council approval of said dedication. Talk to the Project Manager if there are questions or further information is needed. shplrpt_Singh. doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department 1. Administrative Land Use Action REPORT AND DECISION DATED April 7, 2003; PROJECT LUA-03-027, SHPL-A Page 8 2. Remove that part of the dedication statement on the short plat that states "upon recording of this short plat". The previous paragraph notes that said dedication takes place via a separate document. 3. The legal description references Henry H. Tobin Donation Claim No. "97". The correct number is 37. See the attachment for other errors to be corrected in the legal description block. 4. The fence encroachment, noted at the southerly end of the west side of the subject property, appears to be identified incorrectly. The direction of the encroachment should be EAST, not "WEST". Information needed for final short plat approval includes the following: 1. LND-20-0340, respectively, on the drawing in the spaces already provided. 2. Show ties to the City of Renton Survey Control Network. The geometry will be checked when the ties are provided. 3. Provide short plat and lot closure calculations. 4. Note discrepancies between bearings and distances of record and those measured or calculated. NOTE: The dimensions noted on the drawing, for the south and most northerly lines of the subject property, do not equal the sum of the dimensions given in the legal description for the same lines. Please review and revise as needed. 5. Remove the building setbacks noted on the short plat lots. Setbacks will be determined when building permits are issued. 6. The address for Lot 2 is 311 S. Tillicum Street. Note said address on the drawing in the space already provided. 7. On the final short plat submittal, remove all references to trees, utility facilities and other items not directly impacting the subdivision. These items are provided only for preliminary short plat approval. Encroachments do need to be noted on the drawing. 8. The dates noted in the "APPROVALS" block need to be updated. 9. Note that if there are restrictive covenants, easements or agreements to others (City of Renton, etc.) as part of this subdivision, they can be recorded concurrently with the short plat. The short plat drawing and the associated document(s) are to be given to the Project Manager as a package. The short plat shall have the first recording number. The recording number(s) for the associated document(s) should be referenced on the short plat. Plan Review — Surface Water 1. A storm drainage report was submitted with the formal application. An engineered plan showing a infiltration trench was submitted and appears to be in order. 2. The Surface Water System Development fees of $525 per each new lot applies to the proposed project. The Development Charges are collected prior to the issuance of a construction permit. Plan Review — Sewer 1. The sidesewer may need to be relocated and or updated to meet current City code. The applicant does need to verify the location of the existing side sewer to determine if and where it crosses the new lots. 2. The applicant is responsible for securing the necessary easements to serve this plat with sanitary sewer. 3. A sanitary sewer main extension is not required to serve this plat. 4. The applicant needs to show how the new lot will be served with sanitary sewer. 5. Dual sidesewers will not be allowed. The new individual sidesewer stubs shall be installed to serve the new lots' prior to recording the short plat. 6. System Development Charges of $760 per new unit are required to be paid. These fees are collected prior to the issuance of a construction permit. Plan Review — Water 1. An additional fire hydrant will be required to be installed for this project. The existing fire hydrant shall be brought up to current code including stortz fittings as a requirement of this short plat. Any new construction must have a fire hydrant capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 GPM fire and shall be located within 300 feet of the structure. If the building square footage exceeds 3,600 square feet in area, the minimum fire flow increases to 1,500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structure. This distance is measured along a travel route. 2. Pressure reducing valve shall be installed at the domestic meter if the pressure is over 75 psi. 3. Water System Development Charges of $1105 per new unit will be required for this project. These fees are collected prior to the issuance of a construction permit. Please note that any parcel that currently has water and or sewer service may be eligible for a prorated system development charge. Your project will be reviewed to determine how much redevelopment credit applies. Plan Review — Street Improvements 1. The code requires the installation of curb, gutter and sidewalks and provide half pavement width per the standards plus a minimum of 10' pavement along the full frontages and alley of the parcel being developed. 2. Street lighting is not required to be installed for a 2 lot short project. 3. All new electrical, phone and cable services and lines must be undergrounded. Construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton public works inspector prior to recording of the short plat. Plan Review — General 1. This parcel will be required to dedicate an additional 6' of right-of-way along the most northerly property line. shplrpCSingh.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department 11 Administrative Land Use Action REPORT AND DECISION DATED April 7, 2003; PROJECT LUA-03-027, SHPL-A Page 9 2. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 3. All plans shall be tied to a minimum of two of the City's current horizontal and vertical control plan. 4. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvement is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,000 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards. TRANSMITTED this e day of April, 2003 to the owner/applicant: Amrik Singh 10412 SE 186`h Place Renton, WA 98055 TRANSMITTED this , day of April, 2003 to the contact. Darrell Harwood 2431 South 248t' # G36 Kent, WA 98032 TRANSMITTED this 9th day of April, 2003 to the parties of record. Paul M. Nickels 1901 471h Ave. SW Seattle, WA 98116 Don Schumsky 2019 Jones Ave. NE Renton, WA 98056 Michael J. Nelson PO Box 3351 Seattle, WA 98114-3351 TRANSMITTED this 9" day of April, 2003 to the following: Larry Meckling, Building Official L. Rude, Fire Marshal Neil Watts, Development Services Director Jennifer Henning Jan Conklin Came Olson Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney South County Journal Land Use Action Appeals & Requests for Reconsideration The administrative land use decision will become final if the decision is not appealed within 14 days of the effective date of decision. An appeal of the decision must be filed within the 14-day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680). RECONSIDERATION. Within 14 days of the effective date of the decision, any party may request that a decision on a short plat be reopened by the Administrator. The Administrator may modify his decision if material evidence not readily discoverable prior to the original decision is found or if he finds there was misrepresentation of fact. After review of the reconsideration request, if the Administrator finds insufficient evidence to amend the original decision, there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action must file a formal appeal within the following appeal timeframe. APPEAL. This administrative land use decision will become final if not appealed in writing to the Hearing Examiner on or before 5:00 PM on April 23, 2003. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510, Appeals must be filed in writing, together with the required $75.00 application fee, to: Hearing Examiner, City of Rentoi 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. EXPIRATION DATE: The Short Plat approval will expire two (2) years from the date of approval. An extension may be requested pursuant to RMC section 4-7-080.M. shplrpt Singh SE 1/4, NE 1/4, SECTION 18. TWP. 23 N „ RGE, 5 E., W.M. VICINITY MAP - - - - - - - - - - - 14 . it I COMMERCIAL AVE WW ♦I RRORT NAY 2 S. TIk�f x 9 TE 5 TOBIN ST CERTIFICATE I IWEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAI T AM fWE ARE, THE OWNERISI IN FEE SIMPLE OF THE LAND HEREBY PLATTED N TNI3 SNORT PLAT. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Of TE OF WASHINOTONI COUNTY OF KIND I ON THIS DAY PERSONALLY APPEARED BEFORE ME TO ME KNOWN TO BE TH SON S HA K V D N "REDOING INS VM NT. AND ACRNOWLEDOED THA SAID INJ TRUMENT TO BE iXE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED OF THE SAID PEREON191, i0R THE WEf AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED. AND ON OATH STATED THAT THEY WERE AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE 9AID INS TO TH S Of VEN UNDER MY NAND AND SEAL THIS DAY OF 2002 NO ART PUBLIC IN AND 0fl N TATE Or WASXIN.ON RE"', IN* AT LEGAL DESCRIPTION ----------------- THAT PORTION OF TIE NOW K TOM DONATION CAW NO. 97 N THE NOWMAST QUARTER Or SECTION E, TOW~ 21 HMTK RANGE f EASY. W.M.IN*4 COUNTY, WALWGTDK DCSCRIBED AS FOLLOWS BIG•e6G 31! SETT NORM d TK SMKAST CORIQ Or M 2 ACRE TRACT TRACT Or LAND $OID TO D.C. NTCHCLL BY CNARItl BR WI, AFRO lA R100, M D® f011 WNTKK 6 IIECOIIDLT7 N VOL LMT 25A d DEEDS, PAGE Up, RECORDS d KNO COUNTY, wAV NQTCK (SAD CORNER BENG L077., FEET WEST m L138.s2 rCEi NORTH or THE sm NWCST ODMER d BLoC( is OF TK'. or RD/TON} TNE,a EAST A DISTANCE Or 37.0 RRI TSEIK;E NORTH 240.00 fill' THENCE W6T A COOT F J7.11 fEE7; TNCNa SOUM A oSTANCE Or AO FEET• . TMNM sow%. DHTA�. Or i00 rtET�' TKNCE EAST A D6TANCC or AOAo rEEY To rK Pow Or BEAPID; TOGCM WOH A VW OF LAND DCSOM AS rOLLOWS sco"" 335 FEET NORM AND 37., FEET EAST d TIE SOVDME$1 DOIRER d TIE 2 ACNE TRACT d LAN, SOLE TO O.C. WOELL BY C YRLCS APIs 20. C 4 [ICED FOR WNUI 4 RECORDED N VOLUME 25A d DCCOS, PACE 1AIT RECOROs Or RNO COUNTY WASNDOO , (SAD CORNER BONG ,77.12 FEET WEST A1, fUW2IEEi NORM d M SPlDOKS1 CORNER Of GLOP( 25 Or 1K TOWN d RUNTpI}, YND"' 3 67','32T A dSTUKC d L77 REF TIUKE N.156'ST'C ALONG AN Oc " FOES A DISTANCE d 240D01.11: TKNCC N BTW33'W A DSTANCE of U7s FEET• TVENCE S OTSew w 2AO.CO FEET To TNC IRI.f POINT or BFCNNIG. SHORT PLAT NO. LUA-_-_-SHPL I LND _ - I 3.2s1_ AIRPORT WAY H 87•I4'4 •W 807.•5' WI . RENTON REAL ESTATE CO'S =i- 1ST. ADDITION TO RENTON 3R VOL. 21. PG 50 0 8= i - 6' AODf TIONAI RIGHT-OF-WAY - 1 40'O _TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY : 0 40 8 O .y Of RENTON UPON RECORDINO OF ,216TI HSC.HORt eL 1T, li NAD f963/96, 1 BEARING ` TOTAL AREA: 1727 OF-- VERTICAL DATUM 1E MAYO 1966. 7.14'• 'W ALLEY 17 SITE ADDRESS: 312 E. T061NNS) N REET 5 87•I•••2•E _ ! 630.66' I CVRRENT ZONINO, 'R-6' _ - _ • - i65.A3' EL•32.0' ,S NET DENS: TYPROPOfEDI 1.3 S. TILLICUM ST 4 $ I NET DE TT PE0. COOS: 9.7 O.V., ORIGINAL TAX PARCEL • 7200033•00 S 87•I•'A - EL•31.8' A ,•4' LEOENO / Ow y END-WN.•IN CASE •• •••• 23 125 FENCE I.I' WEST .�L 1'N` P FIELO VISITED OCT OBER 2002 '�ei R 8 LOT : "I: 1/3' I.R. W/GP No. 21464 SET. FRO. COR. AE NOTED. m LOT 2 . W• OIW 9S8L • BUILOINO SETBACK LINE. •• 7.810 SF i N I• N _ ]0�858� ��� y,� u "I NOTES! xlEKl n \ = W 1. TXE LOTS CREATED HEREIN Fell WITHIN A COAL MINE HAZARD > ! 8 �l $ ! ERI AREA AS IOENTIF FED BY A GEOTECXNICAL ENGINEER ♦f THE �e 3 87.1g $ TIME OF TNIE SUBDIVISION. APES ENCE OF SUCH Cl XA2AA0 NAY y' 3 32'E OW O\t'\ OQ\ g, ; I TRIGGER MITIGATION MEASURES AT THE TIME OF ONSTRVCTION WII 76.3e' 0 0 ' V• _ $ \\�\(7' < 2. NEW LOT ADDRESSEE: BSBL-b0•' >; ~ Z I LOT I: 312 S. TOBIN STREET A I LOT 1 \��`� i LOT 2: ! 6.70, BF 1 1�L" �• .1. V) g; 33.7' \ �-� APPROVALS 8 r55a x8 ' I XIE_ z LOT I L ET cW II HOUSE I _____________ „ fsau' I 16.3• i CITY OF RENTON , FENCE '.J••• WEST EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY Of __ _ toot. ,e FND. I/2'IR FND. 1/2'10. 70' BSBL I IN 3 3' WIY, 3.6' RLY. I � EL•30. ]' W . Y' - I -wo ws 3 B]•13'31'f iEl •31.0' 79,Ip' WA 6.28SS1.79' 'CONC WALK KING COUNTY 001.16' f807.06'.PI - _ _ . _ _ _ - - - _ _ S, TOPIN STREET_~ I eEXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS - DAY OF 20, rg 32'W }'�-Tim .�. �.-6_-� 85= . -E6 _ �--•1 062. 16' 1862.06 :.P T'- DEPARTMENT OF ASSES DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSPYRTf- KING COUNTY ASSESSOR DEPUTY KING COUNTY ASSESSOR SURVEY MmTS OR EXCEEDS TK FEPREAOITS OF WAC 332{TO.OSO. EDVLOFI UAFD V TOTAL STATION ASIYEY MtT4* FED TRAVERSE. WJ,TNE POSITIONAL TOU"ICE OF SET CP•Q@ •Or slRlveTaR•s ceRTIrICATe _ Reca+DER•a CQiTIFICATE Tnl. no0 oerHolly NP1n•nl. a W -y naa• DY M of ..a.1 •• F11•4 fe1 f.e.ra TNu ................................ any at•......__. to. al ..u. AMR I K S I NGH SHORT PLAT nv au •ol ron IA oonrernene..N.n In• .• m....•.. of .n• so,Y•y Ie ee•H e1 oe9• o..n• Nwu•.. of SE 111. HE I,". SEC. 18. TWP. 23 N.. Mr. 5 E.. W.W. ____ of ........ ..__ Reoeralny A91 el m• r•amn or CP.RREI H�I1W000 In OCjoeEg_.._ O2 Roan•y G Nae•an CITY Or RENTON. WASHINGTON. 'a eR.y N n1. DHN BY RGH DATE !0/3/OZ JOB N0, 20236 6- Me.a9.T soot. f R•oo1aCHKD BY RGH . SCALE 1 • = 40 •1 SHEET , 1 OF I PROPERTY OWNER, AMR IK J'NO N J12 SOUTH TOBIN STREET RENTON. WA 98055 OWNER•$ REPRESENTATIVE: DARREL HARWOOD 312 SOUTH TOBIN STREET RENTON. W4 900l3 206•46!••602 HANSEN SURVEYING LAND SURVEYORS s CONSULTANTS 1"0 ' IICFN AV6 M BUITZ A-4. RENTON, WA DOM TEL 425-2164660 TAX' 425-2*4265 E3 ' T23N R5E E 1/2 CA - �A- IM(P) Airport Way RA 1 UM CA A - -$ -�� m[] R I i RL$ I 8 cto �' A M 110 a CD(P) -� A S 2nd St. 1 W CA �T�C QJA ojT r L `�Y O ZONING P/WPW TECMUCAL SERVICES '?� �O 03/15/02 1 Mr ► E -o-- m =00 -00 C R-8 G3 - 19 T23N R5E E 1/Z i ---- Renton dit, Limits +w. �i F--!-IE-�l �i---� MIM MIM SJ l� 2nd RM 04 -U D- C r- C -- Z C PCD<P) CD I DQ BCD --C CDrn .y LD,. a` _c 3 1:4800 18 T23N R5E E 1/2 5318 E 1/4) NE 1/4) SECTION 18) TWR 23 N,, RGEf 5 E.) WX 1' + 20' 0®2L �f + ai-19'42'E 16S,4S' jlj� on�ncw 1V I I EXISTING + FENCE 1.1' WEST --yl TO BE REMOVED II LET 2 7,810 SF xw,fba.iw,r. ' EL ran.xraM xm faR«aadwwn.a� •"M'°'�""'^ 20' BSDBSBL HAD te9i/f1 KMIIw IOTAL MCM 16r717 SF - VORTICAL DAl1,R1 is NAVD 19ee, ialp rMn ilT[ ADDRClL il! >, ip1Dt STRKY DURRoIr DaIDa'R•a' _ iwaa S 87'13'32'E )c;.38' NET DMlITYIRDFOKD 93 D,WACftE IRT DENSITY Fu twu st nuiACR[ mllmxAL TAXPARPARCELC 20' BSBL R Teowse-DD LCDCND HotEa: 1��OaRslabw n J LOT T 1 N •• INp �N, D� ��( VICITCEADF DCt01ER io06 �i�ALD . • N6rti�ldvi[T 8,701 SF RR • /lm, EDR As hoTCR ISK • lDILDIHD 11[TRACx LDIL CRINMIw bw.rw. I 1 E m•o�w/, v8' EXIST �°ia1jn"bb' HOUSE PROPERTY OWNER, FF=35. AMRIK SINGH + m m ti 312 SOUTH TOBIN STREET in REN70N, WA 98033 I � 20' BSBLo OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVES + L+30J' °1 DARREL HARWOOD 0 312 SOUTH TOBIN STREET - - - - �-7628' - RENiON WA 98055 T N 87'14'42'W 630,86' +31-0' 79,10' ' SANI SEWER I N 87.13132'W 862.16' (862.06'-f a • b.. «ud w ab ,1', aI a •sia nA • r f.T rw .ia »+s. lab > Yad eaR mxfr Ia0 w M1 +a. Inndq / mlaM wa load MIR 100 M NO» M1 11 rvol e» w RIw. AiiC PUN NEW OF ROOT DISPERSAL TRENCH Hli PLAN MEW � ra Dil.u. 7iq 1/�ie H PUN NEN' iM Iv.I� r r v» fr I A a.wwa i.Aa r rla.M.IwIw� KCI1oN A INFILTRATION TRENCH Nn J � N` 0 O a Ucenie/9eel VICINITY MAP ---- wry, ----- 11 » Asm,= VAY >r » Bn � >tu+ HAD 993ff1 WARM TOTAL AR16.7P7 Sfi- VERTICAL DATUM 12 NAVD 1999. SITE ADDRESS 312 S. TOBIN STREET CURRENT ZONING, q", NET DENSITYPROPO" 43 D.WACRE NET DENMTY ►M CUM 9.7 DU/ACRE ORIGINAL TAX PARCEL • 7E00033-01I LEGEND' m �AS�, • ■ rIf ELD�VLISITED DCTODER IM HG. 11V AP 464 MT. • • M CM AS NOTED. BSBL ■ DUADING SETBACK LINE. PROPERTY OWNER, AMRIK SINGH 312 SOUTH TOBIN STREET RENTON, WA 9.8055 OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVEi DARREL HARWOOD 312 SOUTH TOBIN STREET RENTON, WA 98055 206-465-4602 4 0 S 87a144 165.45' EL=31.81 E44' EXISTING I , FENCE 1.1' WEST ---� TO BE REMOVED rnk.Krah. X49 hdp Qmw01.p.MTfwwh -- 8N d title h..an r mine BND.ak NOTES: 1. Conlreawlow. k4be onta id of go F k gild of 94 eenOtlom and as pw~ by 0* my of ftfdm► mw OWy,.kla y.rtM. end beak yud b to mvr bA1RrW.n x dgpmd wwKha1MVL slope. 6' ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-1ii TO BE DEDICATED TO THE OF RENTON UPON RECORDIN OF THIS SHORT PLAT, (216 SF+-) New Odwwa► LOT 2 7,810 SF t+.w►au.oaawr. 0 S B7.13732'E - -4-�jt7,38' 20' BSBL L 13T 1 y U8,701 SF —35.6 _C I Ig o 4 EXIST HOUSE r FF=35. t � 1 N in 1 20' BSBL o I L=30.7' 00 1 / A T.-- 7A.a01 - N 87.14'42" EL=32,0' 630.86, EL=31.0' 79,10, SANI SEWER N 87.13'32'W -- �-�� 862,16, (81 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Al N: Submitting Data: For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board. Economic Development, August 4, 2003 Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Agenda Status Staff Contact...... Rebecca Lind (ext. 6588) Consent .............. X Public Hearing. Subject: Ratification of the Amendments to the 2002 Correspondence. Countywide Planning Policies Ordinance... Resolution.... Old Business........ New Business....... Exhibits: Issue Paper Study Sessions...... Attachments: King County staff reports, GMPC Information......... motions and County ordinances Resolution Recommended Action: Approvals: Refer to Planning and Development Committee Legal Dept ... X...... Finance Dept...... Other ............... Fiscal Impact: None Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget City Share Total Project. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Final ratification of the 2002 amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies is before the City for review. These amendments make the following changes: adopt new household and employment targets, amend the Urban Separator Map, add a water supply policy, designate Totem Lake an Urban Center, and add policies addressing Agricultural Production Districts. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution ratifying the amendments. \\DAEDALUS\SYS2\SHARED\EDNSP\Re,-ional Issues\GMPC\CPPs\2002Amends AGENDA B1LL.doc CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING MEMORANDUM DATE: July 28, 2003 TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Council President Members of the Renton City Council C VIA: Mayor Jesse Tanner FROM: Alex Pietsch, Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Rebecca Lind (ext. 6588) SUBJECT: Ratification of 2002 Amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies ISSUE: Ratification of the Growth Management Planning Council's proposed amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs). The amendments make the following changes in the CPPs. 1. Add a new policy to support water supply planning and development (Approved by GMPC Sept. 25, 2002 and Metropolitan King County Council May 19, 2003) 2. Adopt new household and employment targets for 2001 thorough 2022 and amend text defining the methodology used to determine targets (Approved by GMPC July 24, 2002 and Metropolitan King County Council May 19, 2003) 3. Amend the Urban Separator map for the Renton Urban Separator (Approved by GMPC Oct. 23, 2002, and King County Council May 19, 2003). 4. Designate Totem Lake as an Urban Center (Approved by GMPC Oct. 23, 2002 and Metropolitan King County Council May 19, 2003). This action does not effect Renton. 5. Add new policies addressing Agricultural Production Districts outside of the urban growth area (Approved by GMPC Sept. 26, 2001 and Metropolitan King County Council May 19, 2003). This action does not effect Renton. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution ratifying the amendments. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: The CPPs are intended to provide a policy framework for all jursidictions' comprehensive plans in order to provide the regional planning and coordination among local governments required by the Growth Management Act. The CPPs set forth guidance for the location of growth and infrastructure investment in the region and establish specific employment and housing targets for each jurisdiction. Jurisdictions must adopt land use and zoning to accommodate these targets in their respective plans and development regulations. Amendments to the CPPs must be approved by the Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) and the Metro King County Council and ratified by jurisdictions represented in the GMPC. The current group of amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies were approved by the GMPC and County Council after extensive staff analysis, public comment, and review by local elected officials. Renton participated in the GMPC review throughout the process and the proposed amendments that effect the City were referred to the Planning and Development Committee and presented to Council for action. This set of amendments will make the following changes that effect Renton: 1) Provide new policy language Policy FW-12c related to water supply planning and development. The policy reads as follows: "Ensuring sufficient water supply is essential to accommodate growth and conserve fish habitat. Due to the substantial lead-time required to develop water supply sources, infrastructure and management strategies, long—term water supply planning efforts in the Region must be ongoing. " 2) Adopt new growth targets for Renton of 6,198 housing units and 27,597 jobs to be achieved by 2022. 3) Incorporate text into the CPPs to define the methodology used to evaluate and distribute regional jobs and housing targets divided by four sub -areas of King County: South County, Eastside, Seattle/Shoreline, and the Rural Area. 3) Adopt the mapping of a new urban separator within the Renton City limits and King County. An agreement between Renton and King County recognizes 118 acres of R-1 zoned land and wetland areas in the City as separator, in exchange for removing the Urban Separator designation from 76 acres located east of Talbot Rd. S. in Renton's Potential Annexation Area. CONCLUSION To become effective, the amendments must be ratified by at least 30 percent of the city and county governments representing 70 percent of the population of King County. The deadline for responding is August 19, 2003. Ratification can occur by default. While it is not necessary to take a formal action, the passage of a resolution puts Renton on the record as supporting the amendments and it provides to way to track Renton's position in the future. O Proposed No. 2003-0123.1 KING COUNTY Signature Report May 19, 2003 Ordinance 14652 Sponsors Hague 1200 King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 1 AN ORDINANCE adopting amendments to the 2 Countywide Planning Policies; adding a new policy to 3 support ongoing water supply planning and development; 4 ratifying the amended Countywide Planning Policies for 5 unincorporated King County; and amending Ordinance 6 10450, Section 3, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 and 7 Ordinance 10450, Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 8 20.10.040. 9 10 11 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY: 12 SECTION 1. Findings. The council makes the following findings. 13 A. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Growth 14 Management Planning Council recommended King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 15 Policies (Phase 1) in July 1992, under Ordinance 10450. 1 Ordinance 14652 16 B. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Phase II 17 amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies on August 15, 1994, under Ordinance 18 11446. 19 C. The Growth Management Planning Council met on September 25, 2002 and 20 voted to recommend amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 21 Policies, adding a new policy to support ongoing water supply planning and 22 development. 23 SECTION 2. Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 are 24 each hereby amended to read as follows: 25 Phase II. 26 A. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning 27 Policies attached to Ordinance 11446 are hereby approved and adopted. 28 B. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 29 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027. 30 C. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 31 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421. 32 D. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 33 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260. 34 E. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 35 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415. 36 F. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 37 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance .13858. 2 Ordinance 14652 38 G. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 — Countywide Planning 39 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390. 40 H. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 — Countywide Planning 41 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391. 42 I. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 — Countywide Planning 43 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392. 44 J. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 — Countywide Planning 45 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to this ordinance 46 SECTION 3. Ordinance 10450, Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040 are 47 each hereby amended to read as follows: 48 Ratification for unincorporated King County. 49 A. Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 10450 for the purposes 50 specified are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 51 B. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 52 10840 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 53 C. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 54 11061 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 55 D. The Phase II amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning 56 Policies adopted by Ordinance 11446 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of 57 unincorporated King County 58. E. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 59 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027 are hereby ratified on behalf of the 60 population of unincorporated King County. 3 Ordinance 14652 61 F. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 62 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421,. are hereby ratified on behalf of the 63 population of unincorporated King County. 64 G. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 65 shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 66 population of unincorporated King County. i 67 H. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 68 shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415, are hereby ratified on behalf of 69 the population of unincorporated King County. 70 I. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as ` 71 shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858, are hereby ratified on behalf of 72 the population of unincorporated King County. 73 J. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 74 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 75 population of unincorporated King County. 76 K. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 77 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 78 population of unincorporated King County. 79 L. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 80 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 81 population of unincorporated King County. I i I 82 j 83 84 I 85 Ordinance 14652 M. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies as shown by Attachment 1 to this ordinance are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County_ Ordinance 14652 was introduced on 3/17/2003 and passed by the Metropolitan King County Council on 5/19/2003, by the following vote: Yes: 12 - Ms. Sullivan, Ms. Edmonds, Mr. von Reichbauer, Ms. Lambert, Mr. Phillips, Mr. Pelz, Mr. McKenna, Mr. Constantine, Mr. Gossett, Ms. Hague, Mr. Irons and Ms. Patterson No: 0 Excused: 0 ATTEST: Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council KING COUNTY COUNCIL KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON ynthia Sullivan, Chair ca O r .. APPROVED this 40t day of YYi t , 2003. on ims, ounty Exec ve Attachments . Attachment 1. GMPC Motion 02-4 5 September 25, 2002 Sponsored By /cm Attachment 1 - 2003-0123 1 MOTION NO. 02-4 14652 Executive Committee 2 A MOTION by the Growth Management Planning Council of King 3 County recommending the amendment of the Countywide Planning 4 Policies adding a new policy to support ongoing water supply 5 planning and development. 6 7 WHEREAS, in July 2002, the Growth Management Planning Council approved additions 8 and changes to the 1994 Countywide Planning Policies approving the countywide process 9 developed to recommend a new 22-year household and employment target; and 10 11 WHEREAS, an amendment to add a new policy supporting ongoing water supply planning 12 and development was considered and tabled; and 13 14 WHEREAS, the GMPC allowed reconsideration of the amendment at such time agreement 15 could be reached on the language; and 16 17 WHEREAS, it is in the interest of the county to encourage regional efforts to plan for and 18 develop sufficient water supply sources to accommodate population growth and to meet 19 environmental needs related to conservation of fish habitat. 20 21 THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY 22 HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS: 23 24 Add a new policy to Section III C of the King County Countywide Planning Policies as 25 follows: 26 FW-12c Ensuring sufficient water supply is essential to accommodate growth and 27 conserve fish habitat. Due to the substantial lead-time required to develop water supply_ 28 sources, infrastructure and management strategies,ng-term water supply planning efforts 29 in the Region must be ongoing_ 30 31 32 33 4 1.1 IN 14652 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on September 25, 2002 in open session. Ron Sims, Chair, Growth Management Planning Council LGMPG02GMPC/Mot02.4.doc - 2 - Metropolitan King County Council Growth Management and Unincorporated Areas Committee Staff Report Agenda Item: 6 Name: Lauren Smith Proposed Ordinance: 2003-0123 Date: March 18, 2003 Attending: Paul Reitenbach, King County DDES Kevin Wright, King County PAO SUBJECT: Proposed Ordinance 2003-0123 adopting amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies; adding a new policy to support ongoing water supply planning and development; ratifying the amended Countywide Planning Policies on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. BACKGROUND: The Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) is a formal body comprised of elected officials from King County, Seattle, Bellevue, the Suburban Cities, and Special Districts. The GMPC was created in 1990 in response to a provision in the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requiring cities and counties to work together to adopt Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs). Under GMA, countywide planning policies serve as the framework for each individual jurisdiction's comprehensive plan, and ensure regional consistency with respect to land use planning efforts. The GMPC drafted the CPPs, which were then adopted by the King County Council and ratified by the cities. Changes to the CPPs are recommended by the GMPC, adopted by the King County Council, and ratified by the cities. GMPC Actions On September 25, 2002 the GMPC adopted Motion 02-4 recommending the adoption of a new policy (FW12c) related to water supply planning and development. The issue of regional water supply was raised during discussions related to the adoption of new household and employment targets for the region, and was offered in the spirit of ensuring ongoing infrastructure planning efforts. The proposed new policy is consistent with existing policy direction in the CPPs related to water supply planning (Policy CO-5). FW-12c Ensuring sufficient water supply is essential to accommodate growth and conserve fish habitat. Due to the substantial lead-time required to develop water supply sources, infrastructure and management strategies, long-term water supply planning efforts in the Region must be ongoing. SUMMARY: Proposed Ordinance 2003-0123 would amend the Countywide Planning Policies by: ♦ Adding a new policy, FW-12c in support of an ongoing discussion related to long-term water supply planning. C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\2003-0123 (CPP Amendments - Water Supply Planning)(3-18A3).doc 5/21/2003 8:50 AM Additionally, the ordinance would ratify this change on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County, as required by Countywide Planning Policy FW-1, Step 9. Amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies become effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution by at least 30% of the city and county governments representing 70% of the population of King County according to the Interlocal agreement. A city shall be deemed to have ratified the countywide planning policy unless, within 90 days of adoption by King County, the city by legislative action disapproves the Countywide Planning Policy. POLICY DIRECTION Countywide Planning Policies CO-5 Water supply shall be regionally coordinated to provide a reliable economic source of water and to provide mutual aid to and between all agecnies and purveyors. THe region should work toward a mechanism to address the long-term regional water demand needs of all agencies and water purveyors. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Proposed Ordinance 2003-0123, with attachments C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\2003-0123 (CPP Amendments - Water Supply Planning)(3-18-03).doc 5/21/2003 8:50 AM 01 Proposed No. 2003-0124.1 KING COUNTY Signature Report May 19, 2003 Ordinance 14653 Sponsors Hague 1200 King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 1 AN ORDINANCE adopting amendments to the 2 Countywide Planning Policies; adopting new household 3 and employment targets for the period 2001 through 2022; 4 revising existing policies and adding new policies in 5 support of the new targets; ratifying the amended 6 Countywide Planning Policies for unincorporated King 7 County; and amending Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as 8 amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 and Ordinance 10450, 9 Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040 10 11 12 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF.KING COUNTY: 13 SECTION 1. Findings. The council makes the following findings. 14 A. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Growth 15 Management Planning Council recommended King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 16 Policies (Phase I) in July 1992, under Ordinance 10450. 1 Ordinance 14653 17 B. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Phase II 18 amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies on August 15, 1994, under Ordinance 19 11446. 20 C. The Growth Management Planning Council met on July 24, 2002 and voted to I 21 recommend amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, 22 revising existing policies and adding new policies to support extending household and 23 employment targets for the period 2001 through 2022. 24 D. The Growth Management Planning Council met on September 25, 2002 and 25 voted to recommend amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 26 Policies, adopting new household and employment targets for the period 2001-2022. i 27 SECTION 2. Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 are 28 each hereby amended to read as follows: 29 Phase II. 30 A. The Phase It Amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning 31 Policies attached to Ordinance 11446 are hereby approved and adopted. 32 B. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 33 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027. 34 C. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 35 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421. . 36 D. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 37 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260. 38 E. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 39 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415. 2 Ordinance 14653 40 F. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 41 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858. 42 G. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 — Countywide Planning 43 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390. 44 H. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 — Countywide Planning 45 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391. 46 I. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 47 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392. 48 J. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 — Countywide Planning 49 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to this ordinance 50 SECTION 3. Ordinance 10450, Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040 are 51 each hereby amended to read as follows: 52 Ratification for unincorporated King County. 53 A. Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 10450 for the purposes 54 specified are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 55' B. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 56 10840 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 57 C. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 58 11061 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated wing County. 59 D. The Phase II amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide PIanning 60 Policies adopted by Ordinance 11446 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of 61 unincorporated King County. 3 Ordinance 14653 62 E. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 63 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027 are hereby ratified on behalf of the 64 population of unincorporated King County. 65 F. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 66 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 67 population of unincorporated King County. 68 G. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 69 shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260,-are hereby ratified on behalf of the 70 population of unincorporated King County. i 71 H. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 72 shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415, are hereby ratified on behalf of 73 the population of unincorporated King County. 74 I. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 75 shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858, are hereby ratified on behalf of 76 the population of unincorporated King County. 77 J. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 78 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 79 population of unincorporated King County. 80 K. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 81 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 82 population of unincorporated King County. 4 Ordinance 14653 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 L. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as shown by Attachment I to Ordinance 14392, are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. M. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as shown by Attachments I through 3 to this ordinancearehereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. Ordinance 14653 was introduced on 3/17/2003 and passed by the Metropolitan King County Council on 5/19/2003, by the following vote: Yes: 12 - Ms. Sullivan, Ms. Edmonds, Mr. von Reichbauer, Ms. Lambert, Mr. Phillips, Mr. Pe1z, Mr. McKenna, Mr. Constantine, Mr. Gossett, Ms. Hague, Mr. Irons and Ms. Patterson No: 0 Excused: 0 ATTEST: ­6"A� - Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council KING COUNTY COUNCIL KING COUNTY, WASEONGTON cu eynthia Sullivan, Chair C' APPROVED this day of rylal 2003. Ron s,C unty Executive Attachments 1. GMPC Motion 02-1, 2. GMPC Motion 02-2, 3. GMPC Motion 02-3 Subareas HouM!" TargTarget PAA HH Job Target Job Capacity in PAA PAA Job Target South King Couno Algona 298 Auburn 5,928 2,635 926 Black Diamond 1 ,099 Burien 1,552 Covington 1,173 Des Mines 1.576 5 2 Federal Way 6188 3,754 1,320 Kent 4,284 1763 61 Milton 50 106 37 Maple Valley 300 Normandy Park 100 Pacific 996 127 45 Renton 6,198 5 622 1.97 SeaTac 4,478 14 5 Tukwila 3,200 13 5 Unincom Kinp County 4.935 To 42,355 14 4035 East Kinz County Beaux Arts Village 3 Bellevue 10317 184 178 Bothell 1751 603 584 Clyde Hill 21 Hunts Point 1 Issa uab 3,993 827 802 Kenmore 2,325 Kirkland 5,480 770 747 Medina 31 Mercer Island 1,437 Newcastle 863 1 1 Redmond 9,083 402 3 Sammamish 3,842 Woodinville 1869 Yarrow Point 28 Unincorp, Kin Coun 6,801 **4222 **4099 Total 47 645 7,009 6,801 Sea- h re Lake Forest Park 538 Seattle 0 ShorelineSboreline 2,651 Unincorp King Coun *** 1670 1670 1,670 Total 56369 1,670 1 7 Rural Cities Carnation 246 Duvall 1037 Enumclaw 7 North Bend 636 Skykontish 20 Snogualmic 1,697 Total 5.563 Kin Coun T tal 151 32 *FAA: Yotentia.1 Annexation Area in Unincorporated King County Urban Area; **Bear Creek UPD; ***North Highline The Rural Cities' targets are for the current city limits and neat expansion area for each city. Thus the metbodology for adjusting targets as annexations occur is not applicable to the rural cities. LJGMPC/02GMPC/Mot02-2.doc - . 3 - 14653 1 14653 PAA Job Target 252 134 44 458 496 497 701 2.582 27 174 221 21 **4193 4,637 694 6 Subareas Household Target HH Capacity in PAA* PAA HH Target Job Target Job Capacity in PAA* South King County Algona 109 Auburn 6.079 252 Black Diamond 2.525 Burien 1.7121 Covington 900 Des Moines 1,695 Federal Way 7A81 134 Kept 11,500 44 Milton 1.054 Maple VaUey 804 Normandy k 67 Pacific 108 Renton 27,597 458 SeaTac 9,288 496 Tukwila 16,000 497 Unincorp King County 2,582 701 TOW 89SOO 2.592 East King County Beaux Arts Village Bellevue 40000 27 Bothell 2,000 14 Clyde Hill Hunts Point Issaquah 14,000 Kenmore 2,800 Kirkland 8,800 221 Medina Mercer Island 800 Newcastle 500 Redmond 21.760 21 Sammamish 1,230 Woodinville 2,000 Yarrow Point Unincorp King County4637 **4193 Total 99.527 1 4637 Sea -Shore Lake Forest Park 455 Seattle 92,093 Shoreline 2,618 Uninco Kin 'Coun *** 694 1,544 Total 95.850, 1 44 Rural Cities Carnation 75 Duvall 1,125 Enumclaw 1,125 North Bend ] 12.5 Sk komish Snoquahnie 1800 Total 5 50 Total 289,1271 *PAA: Potential Annexation Area in Unincorporated The Rural Cities'targets are for the current city limits for adjusting targets as annexations occur is not applicable UGMP002GMPC/Mot02-3.doc King County Urban and nual expansion to the rural Area; **Bear Creek UPD; ***North area for each city. Thus the cities. - 3 - Ifthline methodology July 24, 2002 Sponsored By: /cm 1 MOTION NO. 02-1 Attachment 1 2003-0124 14653 Executive Committee 2 A MOTION by the Growth Management Planning Council of King 3 County recommending the amendment of the Countywide Planning 4 Policies revising existing policies and adding new policies to support 5 the extension of the household and employment targets for the period 6 2001-2022. 7 8 WHEREAS, in accordance with the Growth Management Act (GMA), the 1994 9 Countywide Planning Policies established a household and employment target range for to each city and for King County through 2012; and 11 12 WHEREAS, the 1994 targets need to be extended to reflect projected growth through 2022 13 in accordance with the GMA (RCW 36 70A 110); and 14 15 WHEREAS, Countywide Planning Policy FW-3 states that the adopted household and 16 employment targets shall be monitored by King County annually with adjustments made 17 by the Growth Management Planning Council utilizing the process established in FW-1, 18 Step 6; and 19 20 WHEREAS since February 2001 staff from King County and the cities in King County 21 have worked cooperatively to analyze and recommend new 20-year household and 22 employment targets; and 23 24 WHEREAS the Growth Management Planning Council met and discussed the extension of 25 the household and employment targets for the period 2001-2022, with opportunity for 26 public comment on March 28, 2001, July 25, 2001, October 24, 2001 and May 22, 2002. 27 THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY 28 HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS: 29 30 Amend Sections M. C and III. F of the King County Countywide Planning Policies as 31 follows: 32 33 Land Use Pattern 34 35 C. Urban Areas 36 4 W 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 14653 The following policies establish an Urban Growth Area (UGA), determine the amount of household and employment growth to be accommodated within the UGA in the form of gets for each jurisdiction, and identi methods to phase development within this area in order to bring certainty to long-term planning and development within the County. All cities are included in the UGA, with the cities in the Rural Area identified as islands of urban growth. The (Urban Grewth Are) UGA is a permanent designation. Land outside the ( ) UGA is designated for permanent rural and resource uses.((, e eeptf r the ei fies in the Rural. " )) Countywide Policies on Rural and Resource Areas are found in Chapter IIIA, Resource Lands, and Chapter IIIB, Rural Areas. In accordance with the State Growth Management Act (GMA) (36 70A 110) the State Office of Financial Management (OFM) provides a population project ion to each countY. The county, through a collaborative intergovernmental process established by the Growth Management Planning Council, allocates the population as growth targets to individual Jurisdictions. Forecasts prepared by the Puget Sound Regional Council are used to establish the employment projection. The process for allocating targets in King County is as follows 1. The PSRC employment forecasts are calculated for the four geographic subareas o the UGA (Sea -Shore, South, East, and Rural Cities). These then become subarea employment targets. 2. The iurisdictions collectively allocate the OFM population proiection to the four subarea's based on the projected employment for each area. A small amount of growth is assumed to occur in the Rural area. 3. The technical staff translates the population projectionsinto proiected households taking into account different average household sizes within each subarea These proiections then become subarea household targets. 4. Jurisdictions within each subarea negotiate the distribution of subarea household and employment targets using criteria based on Countywide Planning Policies The housing capacity in the (( )) UGA ((for g wwth)), based on adopted plans and regulations, ((meets -the)) should accommodate the projected 20-year rg owth(( populaiienfereeasts)). (( ))Growth is to be accommodated within permanent Urban Areas by increasing densities, as needed. Phasing ((&4o)) should occur within the ((Urban Grewt Area)) UGA, as necessary, to ensure that services are provided as growth occurs. ((All eitW are -to the Area are to be Urban )) FW-11 The land use pattern for King County shall protect the natural environment by reducing the consumption of land and concentrating development. An. Urban Growth Area, Rural Areas, and resource lands shall be designated and the necessary implementing regulations. adopted. This includes Countywide establishment of a boundary for the Urban Growth Area. Local jurisdictions shall make land use decisions based on the Countywide Planning Policies. LJGMPG02GMPC/Mot02-I.doc - 2 - 2 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 14653 FW-12 The Urban Growth Area shall provide enough land to accommodate future urban development. Policies to phase the provision of urban services and to ensure efficient use of the growth capacity within the Urban Growth Area shall be instituted. FW-12a All iurisdictions within Kinq Countv share the responsibility to accommodate the 20-year population proiection The growth projection shall be assigned to the four subareas of King County (Sea -Shore East South, and the Rural Cities) proportionate with the share of projected employment growth. The growth shall be allocated pursuant to the following objectives: a. To ensure efficient use of land within the UGA by directing growth to Urban Centers and Activity Centers: b. To limit development in the Rural Areas: c. To protect designated resource lands; d. To ensure efficient use of infrastructure; e. To improve the iobs/housing balance on a subarea basis: f. To promote a land use pattern that can be served by public transportation and other alternatives to the single occupancy vehicle-, and g. To provide sufficient opportunities for growth within the iurisdictions. FW-12b The growth targets established pursuant to the methodology described in LU-25c and 25d shall be supported by both regional and local transportation investments. The availability of an adequate transportation system is critically important to accommodating growth. The regional responsibility shall be met by planning for and delivering county, state, and federal investments that support the growth targets and the land use pattern of the County. This includes investments in transit, state highways in key regional transportation corridors, and in improved access to the designated Urban Centers. The local responsibility shall be met by local transportation system investments that support the achievement of the targets. LU — 25a Each imisdiption_s_h_ all plan for and accommodate the household and employment targets established pursuant to LU-25c and LU-25d. This obligation includes: a. Ensuring adequate zoning capacity and b. Planning for and delivering water, sewer, transportation and other infrastructure, in concert with federal and state investments and recognizing where applicable special purpose districts: and c. Accommodating increases in household and employment targets as annexations occur. The targets will be used to plan for and to accommodate growth within each iurisdiction. The targets do not obligate a jurisdiction to guarantee that a given number of housing units will be built or iobs added during the planning period. UGMPCI02GMPCIMot02-I .doc - 3 - 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 14653 LU25b As annexations occur, growth targets shall be adjusted Household and employment targets for each jurisdiction's potential annexation area as adopted in Table LU-1, shall be transferred to the annexing iurisdiction follows: a. King County and the respective city will determine new household and employment targets for areas under consideration for annexation prior to the submittal of the annexation proposal to the King County Boundary Review Board; b. A city's household and employment targets shall be increased by a share of the target for the potential annexation area proportionate to the share of the potential annexation area's development capacity located within the area annexed. Each city will determine how and where within their corporate boundaries to accommodate the target increases: c. The Countv's target shall be correspondingly decreased to ensure that overall target levels in the county remain the same; d. The household and employment targets in Table LU-1 will be updated periodically to reflect changes due to annexations These target updates do not require adoption by the Growth Management Planning Council. LU - ((67)) 25cThe target ((s and-regulatier}s)) objectives identified in ((LU-66)) FW-12a ((1aF:e based-erl)) shall be realized through the following ((steps)) methodology for allocating household targets: a. (( )) Determine the additional population that must be accommodated countywide by calculating the difference between the most recent Census count and the State Office of Financial Management population projection for the end of the twenty Year planning period; b. (( . :)) Subtract a percentage from that number to represent the amount of growth that is assumed to occur in the unincorporated Rural Area: (( faGalities and utilities, ' ' ;)) UGMPG02GMPC/Mot02-1.doc - 4 - 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 14653 c. Assign proportions of the urban population growth to each of the four subareas (Sea -Shore, South, East, and Rural Cities) based on the proportion of future employment growth forecasted for each of those subareas b the Puget Sound Regional Council; d. Convert the estimated proiected population for each subarea to an estimated number of households, using projected average household sizes that reflect the variation among those subareas observed in the most recent Census; e. Allocate a household target to individual jurisdictions, within each subarea, based on FW-12a and considering the following_ factors: 1. the availability of water and the capacity of the sewer system; 2. the remaining portions of previously adopted household targets; 3. the presence of urban centers and activity areas within each jurisdiction 4. the availability of zoned development capacity in each jurisdiction; and 5: the apparent market trends for housing in the area. (( G.The target Fanges ar, shown in Appendix 2 were FOGOMM9Rded b ,)) (( the FeaseRs for deviating from the taFget Fanger-,,:. )) (( , if t , amendments to either the Geuntywide Planning PGliGi9G OF leGal f. Jurisdictions shall plan for household targets as adopted in Table LU-1; and ((f))g. Monitoring should follow the process described in policy FW- 1. A portion of the urban employment growth will occur in Activity Areas and neighborhoods in the Urban Area. This employment growth will support the Urban Centers, while balancing local employment opportunities in the Urban Area. LU - ((68)) 25d (( the joint loGal and Geuntywidq ade, s based on the following steps)) The target obiectives identified in FW-12a shall be realized through the following methodology for allocating employment targets: . ,.. LGMPG02GMPC/Mot02-1.doc - 5 - 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28. 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 with the multiple Centem-strateW, Gapas+ty; of leoal juFisdietiens to implement policies which aneVeF limits, > biGyGle and pedeStFian supportive design, residential a )) Determine the number of iobs that must be accommodated in each of the four subareas of King County (Sea - Shore, South, East, and the Rural Cities) in accordance with the most recent PSRC iob estimates and forecasts for the 20-year planning period. To account for uncertainty in the employment forecasts establish a range of new iobs that must be accommodated in each subarea. Unless exceptional circumstances dictate the range should be 5% on either side of the PSRC forecast. b. ((The taFget Fanger, As shown in Appendix 2 were reGommended b!,i )) For each subarea, determine the point within the range upon which jurisdictions within the subarea will base their targets and allocate employment growth targets to . individual iurisdictions based on consideration of the following_ 1. the PSRC small area forecasts; 2. the presence of urban centers, manufacturing/industrial centers, and activity areas within each jurisdiction; 3. the availability of zoned commercial and industrial development capacity in each iurisdiction and; 4. the access to transit, as well as to existing highways and arterials. ((G. As a part of theiF GernpmhensW plans, all judsdiGtions shall indiGate 20 yeaFG. inside and outside Urban Centers and shall show how th9iF judsdiGtien's GempFehensive plan diffeFs form the target range, the •)) c. Jurisdictions shall plan for employment targets as adopted in Table LU-1. (INSERT TABLE LU-1) LGMPG02GMPGMo102-1 .doc - 6 - 4 PI 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 14653 F. 1. Urban Residential Areas Urban residential areas form the bulk of the UGA, and are home to a large portion of the County's population. They will contain a mix of uses and will have different characteristics in different neighborhoods. Generally, the character, form, preservation and development of these areas ((is -a)) are the responsibility of the local jurisdiction ((ad )). However, the residential areas need to support the Centers concept and provide sufficient opportunity for growth within the UGA. A substantial majority of new residential units will be constructed within urban residential areas. LU-66 In order to ensure efficient use of the land within the UGA, provide for housing opportunities, and to support efficient use of infrastructure, each jurisdiction shall: a. Establish in its comprehensive plan a target minimum number of net new households the jurisdiction will accommodate in the next 20 years in accordance with the adopted household -growth targets identified in Table LU-1. Jurisdictions shall adopt regulations to and commit to fund infrastructure sufficient to achieve the target number; b. Establish a minimum density (not including critical areas) for new construction in each. residential zone; and c. Establish in the comprehensive plan a target mix of housing types for new development and adopt regulations to achieve the target mix. _MVT.r. •0 Trr.. ON WMTVT. , .... NOUN— IJGMPG02GMPC/Mot02-l.doe — 7 — � 1 2 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 14653 �, ,. .. ■ ... VT • .. MIA ill, We ff-It 'ZI .. .. .ffm IT .. _ ._ UGMPCJ026MPC/Mot02-i .doc - 8 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 14653 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on July 24, 2002 in open session. Ron Sims, Chair, Growth Management Planning Council U6MPG02GMPGMot02-l.doc - 9 - 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21, 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 July 24, 2002 /cm Sponsored By: MOTION NO. 02-2 Attachment 2 2003-0124 14653 Executive Committee A MOTION by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County recommending the amendment of the Countywide Planning Policies adding targets for new household for the period 2001-2022 by deleting Appendix 2, 2A and 2B and amending Table LU-1: 2001- 2022 Household and Employment Growth Targets which will be located in Section III. C of the Countywide Planning Policies. WHEREAS, the 1994 Countywide Planning Policies established a housing target range for each city and for King County; and WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act requires the 1994 targets need to be revised to establish an extension of the targets through 2022; and WHEREAS the Growth Management Planning Council met and discussed the extension of the household and employment targets for the period 2001-2022, with opportunity for public comment on March 28, 2001, July 25, 2001, October 24, 2001 and May 22, 2002. THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS: The attached Table LU-1: 2001-2022 Household and Employment Growth Targets is hereby recommended for adoption in the Countywide Planning Policies to revise the household growth targets to reflect the target extension from January 1, 2001 through December 31, 2022 and Appendix 2, 2A, 213 are recommended for deletion. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 it 12 13 14653 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on September 25, 2002 in open session. Ron Sims, Chair, Growth Management Planning Council Attachment: 1. Table LU-1: 2001-2022 Household and Employment Growth Targets. UGMPG02GMPGMot02-2.doc 2 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 -25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 July 24, 2002 /cm Sponsored By: MOTION NO. 02-3 Attachment 3 2003-0124 14653 Executive Committee A MOTION by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County recommending the amendment of the Countywide Planning Policies adding targets for new jobs for the period 2001-2022 by amending Table LU-1: 2001-2022 Household and Employment Growth Targets which will be located in Section III. C of the Countywide Planning Policies. WHEREAS, the 1994 Countywide Planning Policies established an employment target range for each city and for King County; and WHEREAS, the 1994 targets need to be revised to establish an extension of the targets through 2022 as required by the Growth Management Act. WHEREAS the Growth Management Planning Council met and discussed the extension of the household and employment targets for the period 2001-2022, with opportunity for public comment on March 28, 2001, July 25, 2001, October 24, 2001 and May 22, 2002. THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS: The attached Table LU-1: 2001-2022 Household and Employment Growth Targets is hereby recommended for adoption in the Countywide Planning Policies to revise the employment growth targets to reflect the target extension from January 1, 2001 through December 31, 2022. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 it 12 13 14 15 14653 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on September 25, 2002 in open session. Ron Sims, Chair, Growth Management Planning Council Attachment: 1. Table LU-1: 2001-2022 Household and Employment Growth Targets. I/GMPG02GM PGMot02-3.doc - 2 - 0 Metropolitan King County Council Growth Management and Unincorporated Areas Committee Staff Report Agenda Item: 7 Name: Lauren Smith Proposed Ordinance: 2003-0124 Date: March 18, 2003 Attending: Paul Reitenbach, King County DDES Kevin Wright, King County PAO SUBJECT: Proposed Ordinance 2003-0124 adopting amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies; adopting new household and employment targets for the period 2001 through 2022; ratifying the amended Countywide Planning Policies on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. BACKGROUND: The Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) is a formal body comprised of elected officials from King County, Seattle, Bellevue, the Suburban Cities, and Special Districts. The GMPC was created in 1990 in response to a provision in the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requiring cities and counties to work together to adopt Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs). Under GMA, countywide planning policies serve as the framework for each individual jurisdiction's comprehensive plan, and ensure regional consistency with respect to land use planning efforts. The GMPC drafted the CPPs, which were then adopted by the King County Council and ratified by the cities. Changes to the CPPs are recommended by the GMPC, adopted by the King County Council, and ratified by the cities. GMPC Development of Household & Employment Targets In February 2002, the Washington State Office of Financial Management released new population forecasts for the 20-year period 2002-2022 (the projections were smaller than expected, largely due to the current economic climate). The GMA requires King County and the cities within King County to plan to accommodate these updated projections. The GMPC is responsible for developing updated household and employment targets for each jurisdiction in King County. The GMPC's interjurisdictional staff team worked with a subcommittee of the King County Planning Directors to extend the existing targets through 2022, with the GMPC's approval of their methodology. In recent years, the region has grappled with the concept of a jobs/housing "balance" as part of ongoing growth management discussions. The development of the updated targets was approached with the jobs/housing balance in mind. The methodology approved by the GMPC took a sub -regional approach. First, the County's urban area was divided into four subareas: "SeaShore" (comprised of Seattle, Shoreline, and C:\WIND0WS\TEMP\2003.0124 (CPP Amendments - Household Employment Targets)(3-18-03).doc 5/21/2003 8:50 AM Lake Forest Park), East King County, South King County and the Rural Cities'. Next, a percentage of the total population forecast for King County was assigned to each subarea that was based on the percentage of expected job growth for each subarea (employment forecasts were provided by the Puget Sound Regional Council). Finally, the raw population numbers were converted into households (based on the average household size in each subarea), and the jurisdictions within each subarea negotiated their household targets. The draft household and employment targets were presented to the GMPC On May 22, 2002 at which time the GMPC directed staff to prepare motions recommending their adoption. Policy changes related to the new targets were adopted on July 24, 2002 and the targets themselves were adopted on September 25, 2002. Development of the household targets was informed by the results of the Buildable Lands work (required by GMA), which has been developed over the past 5 years (the Buildable Lands Report was released in August, 2002). Major findings from this work include: ♦ 96% of all new development in King County is occurring within Urban Growth Areas. ♦ 40% of the way through the 1992-2012 planning period, King County has reached 38% of the household growth target, and more than 50% of the population forecast. ♦ King County has the capacity for 263,000 more housing units. This is more than twice the capacity needed to accommodate the remainder of the 1992-2012 household growth targets. ♦ King County has the capacity for nearly 600,000 more jobs within the Urban Growth Area — several times the remaining target of 110,000 jobs for the period 1992-2012. ♦ All available evidence suggests that there is enough capacity to support the new targets through 2022. SUMMARY: Proposed Ordinance 2003-0127 would amend the Countywide Planning Policies by: ♦ Adopting revised household targets for each jurisdiction in King County for the period 2001-2022; ♦ Adopting revised employment targets for each jurisdiction in King County for the period 2001-2022; and ♦ Amending the policy direction in the Countywide Planning Policies in support of the new household and employment targets. Additionally, the ordinance would ratify these changes on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County, as required by Countywide Planning Policy FW-1, Step 9. Amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies become effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution by at least 30% of the city and county governments representing 70% of the population of King County according to the Interlocal agreement. A city shall be deemed to have ratified the countywide planning policy unless, within 90 days of adoption by King County, the city by legislative action disapproves the Countywide Planning Policy. ATTACHMENTS: 1 Although the Carnation, Duvall, Enumclaw, North Bend and Snoqualmie are called Rural Cities, the Growth Management Act considers all municipalities to be Urban. Rural cities provide the vast majority of services and infrastructure for residents of the Rural unincorporated area, and they do have growth targets, albeit small ones when compared to cities in the main urban growth area. C:\WIND0WS\TEMP\2003.0124 (CPP Amendments - Household Employment Targels)(3.18-03).doc 5/21/2003 8:50 AM Proposed Ordinance 2003-0124, with attachments C:IWINDOWSITEMPf2003-0124 (CPP Amendments - Household Employment Targets)(3-18-03).doc 5/21/2003 8:50 AM 0 Proposed No. 2003-0125.1 KING COUNTY Signature Report May 19, 2003 Ordinance 14654 Sponsors Hague 1200 King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 1 AN ORDINANCE adopting amendments to -the 2 Countywide Planning Policies; amending the Urban 3 Separator map to reflect negotiated modifications to the 4 Renton Urban Separator; ratifying the amended 5 Countywide Planning Policies for unincorporated King 6 County; and amending Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as 7 amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 and Ordinance 10450, 8 Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040 9 10 I 1 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY: 12 SECTION 1. Findings. The council makes the following findings.. 13 A. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Growth 14 Management Planning Council recommended King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 15 Policies (Phase 1) in July 1992, under Ordinance 10450. 1 Ordinance 14654 16 B. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Phase II 17 amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies on August 15, 1994, under Ordinance 18 11446. 19 C. The Growth Management Planning Council met on October 23, 2002 and 20 voted to recommend amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 21 Policies, amending the Urban Separator map to reflect negotiated modifications to the 22 Renton Urban Separator. 23 SECTION 2. Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 are 24 each hereby amended to read as follows: 25 Phase II. 26 A. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning 27 Policies attached to Ordinance 11446 are hereby approved and adopted. 28 B. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 29 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027. 30 C. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 31 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421. 32 D. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 33 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260. 34 E. The Phase II Amendments. to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 35 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415. 36 F. The Phase Il Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 37 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858. 2 Ordinance 14654 38 G. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 — Countywide Planning 39 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390. 40 H. The Phase 11 Amendments to the King County 2012 — Countywide Planning 41 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391. 42 1. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 — Countywide Planning 43 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392. 44 1 The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 — Countywide Planning 45 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to this ordinance 46 SECTION 3. Ordinance 10450, Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040 are 47 each hereby amended to read as follows: i48 Ratification for unincorporated King County. 49 A. Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 10450 for the purposes 50 specified are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 51 B. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 52 10840 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 53 C. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 54 11061 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 55 D. The Phase II amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning 56 Policies adopted by Ordinance 11446 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of 57 unincorporated King County. 58 E. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 59 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027 are hereby ratified on behalf of the 60 population of unincorporated King County. 3 Ordinance 14654 61 F. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 62 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 63 population of unincorporated King County. 64 G. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 65 shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 66 population of unincorporated King County. 67 H. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 68 shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415, are hereby ratified on behalf of 69 the population of unincorporated King County. 70 I. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as i 71 shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858, are hereby ratified on behalf of 72 the population of unincorporated King County. 73 J. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 74 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390, are hereby ratified on behalf of the i 75 population of unincorporated King County. 76 K. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 77 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 78 population of unincorporated King County. 79 L. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 80 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 81 population of unincorporated King County. 4 82 83 84 85 Ordinance 14654 M. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies as shown by Attachment 1 to this ordinance are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. Ordinance 14654 was introduced on 3/17/2003 and passed by the Metropolitan King County Council on 5/19/2003, by the following vote: Yes: 12 - Ms. Sullivan, Ms. Edmonds, Mr. von Reichbauer, Ms. Lambert, Mr. Phillips, Mr. Pelz, Mr. McKenna, Mr. Constantine, Mr. Gossett, Ms. Hague, Mr. Irons and Ms. Patterson No: 0 Excused: 0 ATTEST: Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council KING COUNTY COUNCIL KING COUNTY, WASBINGTON r Cynthia Sullivan, Chair W _ o .T. �7 r_- APPROVED this 2& day of , 2003 Attachments 1. GMPC Motion 02-5 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 October 23, 2002 Sponsored By: MOTION NO. 02-5 Attachment 1 2003-0125 14654 Executive Committee A MOTION to amend the Urban Separator Map in the Countywide Planning Policies to reflect the negotiated modifications of the Renton Urban Separator. WHEREAS, .The Growth Management Act states that each Urban Growth Area shall permit urban densities and shall include greenbelt and open space areas; WHEREAS, Urban Separators are an adopted regional strategy serving multiple functions and providing environmental, visual, recreational and wildlife benefits to the citizens and communities of King County; WHEREAS, Consistent with the Countywide Planning Policies, the King County Comprehensive Plan recognizes that Urban Separators create open space corridors, provide a visual contrast to continuous development, and reinforce the unique identities of communities; WHEREAS, King County has designated Urban Separators on the Land Use 2000 map in the King County Comprehensive Plan, and King County has provided advance copies of Urban Separator maps to cities that have designated Urban Separators located within their Potential Annexation Areas; WHEREAS, the City of Renton disagreed with Urban Separator.designation for 76 acres of land within its Potential Annexation Area; and WHEREAS, the Growth Management Planning Council directed staff to attempt to negotiate a mutually acceptable resolution of this disagreement 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 14654 THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS: The Urban Separators map included within the Countywide Planning Policies document is amended to reflect the negotiated modifications of the Renton Urban Separator described and mapped in the September 25, 2002 GMPC staff report. Specifically, 76 acres of unincorporated land is deleted from Urban Separator designation and 118.8 acres within the City of Renton shall be designated Urban Separator. ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on October 23, 2002 in open session. 1JGMPM002GMPGMotion02-5.doc Ron Sims, Chair, Growth Management Planning Council O Metropolitan King County Council Growth Management and Unincorporated Areas Committee Staff Report Agenda Item: 8 Name: Lauren Smith Proposed Ordinance: 2003-0125 Date: March 18, 2003 Attending: Paul Reitenbach, King County DDES Kevin Wright, King County PAO SUBJECT: Proposed Ordinance 2003-0125 adopting amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies; amending the Urban Separator map to reflect negotiated modifications to the Renton Urban Separator; ratifying the amended Countywide Planning Policies on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. BACKGROUND: The Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) is a formal body comprised of elected officials from King County, Seattle, Bellevue, the Suburban Cities, and Special Districts. The GMPC was created in 1990 in response to a provision in the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requiring cities and counties to work together to adopt Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs). Under GMA, countywide planning policies serve as the framework for each individual jurisdiction's comprehensive plan, and ensure regional consistency with respect to land use planning efforts. The GMPC drafted the CPPs, which were then adopted by the King County Council and ratified by the cities. Changes to the CPPs are recommended by the GMPC, adopted by the King County Council, and ratified by the cities. Countywide Planning Policies: Policy Direction related to Urban Separators Urban Separators are regionally significant low -density areas within the Urban Growth Area that create open space corridors, provide a visual contrast to continuous development and reinforce the unique identities of communities. Urban Separators can play a significant role in preserving environmentally sensitive areas and providing fish and wildlife habitat. They also provide regional benefits, such as parks and trails, and meet the Growth Management Act's requirement for greenbelts and open space within the Urban Growth Area. Urban Separators are governed by Countywide Planning Policy LU-27: LU-27 Urban Separators are low -density areas or areas of little development within the Urban Growth Area. Urban Separators shall be defined as permanent low -density lands which protect adjacent resource lands, Rural Areas, and environmentally sensitive areas and create open space corridors within and between Urban Areas which provide environmental, visual, recreational and wildlife benefits. Designated urban separators shall not be redesignated in the future (in the 20-year planning cycle) to other urban uses or higher densities. The maintenance of these urban separators is a regional as C:\WIND0WS\TEMPt2003-0125 (CPP Amendments - Renton Urban Separator)(3-18-03).doc 5/21/2003 8:50 AM well as local concern. Therefore, no modifications should be made to the development regulations governing these areas without King County review and concurrence. Urban Separators are within the Urban Growth Area and therefore are appropriate to be annexed by cities. Once annexed, Urban Separators (and all other annexed land) are shown as "incorporated areas" on the County's comprehensive land use map. The lack of a map of Urban Separators in the countywide planning document was seen by the staff as problematic because it increased the likelihood that cities might be unaware of the presence of Urban Separators within their Potential Annexation Areas. Therefore, the interjurisdictional staff team recommended that the GMPC adopt a map of existing Urban Separators. Three cities have designated Urban Separators within their Potential Annexation Areas: Auburn,. Kent, and Renton. Past GMPC Actions related to Urban Separators July 25, 2001 GMPC staff recommends including a map of existing urban separators in the Countywide Planning Policies. Member jurisdictions of the GMPC express concern over the boundaries of designated Urban Separators and ask the interjurisdictional staff team to present additional information at the September meeting. September 26, 2001 GMPC directs staff to meet with affected cities (Kent, Renton and Auburn) to answer questions and clarify the boundaries of the designated Urban Separators. October 5, 2001 King County staff meets with Kent, Renton and Auburn to answer questions and clarify the boundaries of the designated Urban Separators. November 20, 2001 The interjurisdictional staff team reports to the GMPC Executive Committee that staff has successfully negotiated a solution to concerns about mapping Urban Separators raised by Renton and Auburn. The Executive Committee directs staff to develop a motion for the GMPC's consideration at the December meeting. December 11, 2001 GMPC adopts Motion 01-1, adopting maps of uncontested Urban Separators and setting in place a process to further analyze and refine the Urban Separators in Renton and Auburn's Potential Annexation Areas, to be completed no later than September 30, 2002. September 25, 2002 The interjurisdictional staff team reported back to the GMPC with the following information on the City of Renton and Auburn's Urban Separators: City of Renton Renton did not agree with the Urban Separator designation for 76 acres of unincorporated urban land within their Potential Annexation Area (PAA), citing lack of environmental C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\2003-0125 (CPP Amendments - Renton Urban Separator)(3-18-03).doc 5/21/2003 8:50 AM constraints. However, Renton did identify 119 acres within their city limits that they felt met the criteria for designation of Urban Separators. The City proposed removing the Urban Separator designation from the 76 acres within their PAA, and applying the designation to the 119 acres within their city boundaries, for a net gain of 43 acres. The interjurisdictional staff team field - checked the two areas and concurred with the city's conclusions. City of Auburn Auburn did not agree with the Urban Separator designation for 178 acres of land within their PAA, but has identified 153 acres they do feel meets the criteria. The City of Kent recently annexed a large piece of property adjacent to Auburn's existing Urban Separator that the interjurisdictional staff team believes contains environmentally constrained areas and that would make a natural extension of the existing Urban Separator. However, the City of Kent does not wish to consider designating this area until sometime in 2003. Therefore, the interjurisdictional staff team recommends that discussions should continue with Auburn and Kent, and that staff should report back to the GMPC with recommendations by June 1, 2003. October 23, 2002 The GMPC adopted Motion 02-5, amending the Countywide Planning Policies to reflect the negotiated modifications to the Renton Urban Separator. SUMMARY - Proposed Ordinance 2003-0125 would amend the Countywide Planning Policies by: ♦ Revising the Urban Separator map to reflect the negotiated modifications to the Renton Urban Separator, as indicated on the map in Attachment 2 to this staff report. Additionally, the ordinance would ratify these changes on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County, as required by Countywide Planning Policy FW-1, Step 9. Amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies become effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution by at least 30% of the city and county governments representing 70% of the population of King County according to the Interlocal agreement. A city shall be deemed to have ratified the countywide planning policy unless, within 90 days of adoption by King County, the city by legislative action disapproves the Countywide Planning Policy. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Proposed Ordinance 2003-0125, with attachments 2. Map of Renton Urban Separator C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\2003-0125 (CPP Amendments - Renton Urban Separator)(3-18-03).doc 5/21/2003 8:50 AM 0 Proposed No. 2003-0126.1 KING COUNTY Signature Report May 20, 2003 Ordinance 14655 Sponsors Hague 1200 King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 1 AN ORDINANCE adopting amendments to the 2 Countywide Planning Policies; designating Totem Lake as 3 an Urban Center; ratifying the amended Countywide 4 Planning Policies for unincorporated King County; and 5 amending Ordinance 10450, Section.3, as amended, and 6 K.C.C. 20.10.030 and Ordinance 10450, Section 4, as 7 amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040 8 9 10 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY: 11 SECTION 1. Findings. The council makes the following findings. 12 A. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Growth 13. Management Planning Council recommended King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 14 Policies (Phase I) in July 1992, under Ordinance 10450. 15 B. The metropolitanKing County council adopted and ratified the Phase II 16 amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies on August 15, 1994, under Ordinance 17 11446. Ordinance 14655 18 C. The Growth Management Planning Council met on October 23, 2002 and 19 voted to recommend amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 20 Policies, designating Totem Lake as an Urban Center. i 21 SECTION 2. Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 are i 22 each hereby amended to read as follows: 23 Phase II. 24 A. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning 25 Policies attached to Ordinance 11446 are hereby approved and adopted. 26 B. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 27 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027. 28 C. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 29 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421 30 D. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 31 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260. 32 E. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning I 33 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415. 34 - F. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 35 - Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858. 36 G. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 — Countywide Planning 37 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390. 38 H. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 — Countywide Planning 39 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391. 2 Ordinance 14655 40 I. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 — Countywide Planning 41 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392. 42 J. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 — Countywide Planning 43 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to this ordinance 44 SECTION 3. Ordinance 10450, Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040 are 45 each hereby amended to read as follows: 46 Ratification for unincorporated King County. 47 A. Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 10450 for the purposes 48 specified are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 49 B. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 50 10840 are hereby ratified on behalf.of the population of unincorporated King County. 51 C. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 52 11061 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 53 D. The Phase II amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning 54 Policies adopted by Ordinance 11446 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of 55 unincorporated King County. 56 E. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 57 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027 are hereby ratified on behalf of the 58 population of unincorporated King County. 59 F. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 60 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 61 population of unincorporated King County. 3 Ordinance 14655 62 G. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 63 shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 64 population of unincorporated King County. 65 H. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 66 shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415, are hereby ratified on behalf of 67 the population of unincorporated King County. 68 I. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 69 shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858, are hereby ratified on behalf of 70 the population of unincorporated King County. I 71 J. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as i 72 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 73 population of unincorporated King County. 74 K. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as I 75 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 76 population of unincorporated King County. 77 L. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 78 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance- 14392, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 79 population of unincorporated King County. 80 M. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies as 4 81 82 RX Ordinance 14655 shown by Attachment I to this ordinance are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. Ordinance 14655 was introduced on 3/17/2003 and passed by the Metropolitan King County Council on 5/19/2003, by the following vote: Yes: 12 - Ms. Sullivan, Ms. Edmonds, Mr. von Reichbauer, Ms. Lambert, Mr. Phillips, Mr. Pelz, Mr. McKenna, Mr. Constantine, Mr. Gossett, Ms. Hague, Mr. Irons and Ms. Patterson No: 0 Excused: 0 ATTEST: bK ' " Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council KING COUNTY COUNCIL KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON ynthia Sullivan, Chair 3: CZ1 A: O � fJ APPROVED this 3CPday of MQJ , 2003. Attachments 1. GMPC Motion 02-6 5 n Si , ounty Executive 1 2 3 4 5 lei 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 October 23, 2002 Sponsored By: MOTION NO. 02-6 Attachment 1 2003-0126 14655 Executive Committee A MOTION to amend the Countywide Planning Policies by designating Totem Lake as an Urban Center. Totem Lake is added to the list of Urban Centers following Countywide Planning Policy LU-39. WHEREAS, A goal of the Growth Management Act is to encourage. development in Urban Areas where adequate public facilities exist or can be provided in an efficient manner; WHEREAS, Policy LU-39 of the Countywide Planning Policies of King County describes the criteria for Urban Center designation; WHEREAS, Policy LU-40 of the Countywide Planning Policies of King County describes standards for planned land uses within Urban Centers; WHEREAS, the City of Kirkland has demonstrated that Totem Lake meets the criteria for designation as an Urban Center, -and that Kirkland's "Totem Lake Activity Area" designated on the City's comprehensive plan land use map is consistent with the standards established by the Countywide Planning Policies for Urban Center designation. WHEREAS, King County Comprehensive Plan Policy U-106 supports the development of Urban Centers to meet the region's needs for housing, jobs, services, culture and recreation. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 14655 THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS: Totem Lake is designated as an Urban Center. The list of Urban Centers following Countywide Planning Policy LU-39 is modified to include Totem Lake. ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on October 23, 2002 in open session. IJGMM2002GMPC/Motion02-6.doc Ron Sims, Chair, Growth Management Planning Council Metropolitan King County Council Growth Management and Unincorporated Areas Committee Staff Report Agenda Item: 9 Name: Lauren Smith Proposed Ordinance: 2003-0126 Date: March 18, 2003 Attending: Paul Reitenbach, King County DDES Kevin Wright, King County PAO SUBJECT: Proposed Ordinance 2003-0126 adopting amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies; designating Totem Lake as an Urban Center; ratifying the amended Countywide Planning Policies on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. BACKGROUND: The Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) is a formal body comprised of elected officials from King County, Seattle, Bellevue, the Suburban Cities, and Special Districts. The GMPC was created in 1990 in response to a provision in the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requiring cities and counties to work together to adopt Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs). Under GMA, countywide planning policies serve as the framework for each individual jurisdiction's comprehensive plan, and ensure regional consistency with respect to land use planning efforts. The GMPC drafted the CPPs, which were then adopted by the King County Council and ratified by the cities. Changes to the CPPs are recommended by the GMPC, adopted by the King County Council, and ratified by the cities. City of Kirkland requests Urban Center designation for Totem Lake In 2002, the City of Kirkland requested that Totem Lake be designated as an Urban Center in the Countywide Planning Policies. Urban Centers are envisioned in the CPPs as areas of concentrated employment and housing, with direct service by high -capacity transit, and a wide range of other land uses. They are expected to account for up to one half of King County's employment growth and one quarter of household growth over the next 20 years. In January, 2002 the Kirkland City Council adopted a new plan for the Totem Lake neighborhood that would support its designation as an Urban Center. Totem Lake, which is located in the northeast corner of Kirkland, encompasses about one square mile and includes residential, office, retail, light industrial and institutional uses. Designating Totem Lake as an Urban Center would involve amending Countywide Planning Policy LU-39 to add it to the list of existing Urban Centers, which currently includes: Bellevue Kent Federal Way Redmond Overlake Redmond CBD Renton CBD .• Seattle CBD Seattle Center First/Capitol Hill C:\WIND0WS\TEMP\2003-0126 (CPP Amendments - Totem Lake Urban Center)(3-18-03).doc 5/21/2003 8:51 AM University District : Northgate Tukwila In order to be designated as an Urban Center, jurisdictions must meet specific criteria in the Countywide Planning Policies, including having planned land uses to accommodate: :• A minimum of 15,000 jobs within one-half mile of a transit center; At a minimum, an average of 50 employees per gross acre; and :• At a minimum, an average of 15 households per acre. When fully realized, Urban Centers shall be characterized by the following: Clearly defined geographic boundaries; :• An intensity/density of land uses sufficient to support effective and rapid transit; Pedestrian emphasis within the Center; Emphasis on superior urban design which reflects the local community; .• Limitations on single -occupancy vehicle usage during peak commute hours; A broad array of land uses and choices within those land uses for employees and residents; Sufficient public open spaces and recreational opportunities; and Uses which provide both daytime and nighttime activities in the Center. The interjurisdictional staff team analyzed the Totem Lake neighborhood against all of the criteria in the Countywide Planning Policies governing Urban Centers, and found that an Urban Center designation would be appropriate, for the following reasons: :• The City of Kirkland has completed the necessary planning to support an Urban Center designation. By 2012, Totem Lake is projected to contain over 4,500 housing units and 21,400 jobs. :• Totem Lake is planned as a transit oriented development district with very high residential and commercial intensity. : A new transit center will be constructed at the center of the transit oriented development district. Within Y2 mile of the transit center, 11,000 jobs and 2000 housing units are projected by 2012. Another 3,000 to 4,000 jobs are expected by 2022. Employment densities in Totem Lake are planned for a minimum of 130 jobs per acre (net), and will reach approximately 40 jobs per gross acre by 2022. Residential densities are planned for 50-75 units/acre (net). Capacity will remain for additional job and housing growth beyond 2022. Other comprehensive plan policies are in place to support pedestrian emphasis, job creation and re -investment, redevelopment, high density residential and high intensity commercial uses, design principles, infrastructure, parks and open space, and community services. SUMMARY: Proposed Ordinance 2003-0126 would amend the Countywide Planning Policies by: ♦ Adding Totem Lake to the list of Urban Centers in Policy LU-39. Additionally, the ordinance would ratify the change on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County, as required by Countywide Planning Policy FW-1, Step 9. Amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies become effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution by at least 30% of the city and county governments representing 70% of the population of King County according to the Interlocal agreement. A city shall be deemed to C:\WIND0WS\TEMP\2003-0126 (CPP Amendments - Totem Lake Urban Center)(3.18.03).doc 5/21/2003 8:51 AM have ratified the countywide planning policy unless, within 90 days of adoption by King County, the city by legislative action disapproves the Countywide Planning Policy. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Proposed Ordinance 2003-0126, with attachments C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\2003-0126 (CPP Amendments - Totem Lake Urban Center)(3.18.03).doc 5/21/2003 8:51 AM 0 Proposed No. 2003-0127.1 KING COUNTY Signature Report May 20, 2003 Ordinance 14656 Sponsors Hague 1200 King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 1 AN ORDINANCE adopting amendments to the 2 Countywide Planning Policies addressing the long-term 3 protection. of agricultural production districts; ratifying the 4 amended Countywide Planning Policies for unincorporated 5 King County; and amending Ordinance 10450, Section 3, 6 as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 and Ordinance 10450, 7 Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040 8 9 10 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY: 11 SECTION 1. Findings. The council makes the following findings. 12 A. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Growth 13 Management Planning Council recommended King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 14 Policies (Phase I) in July 1992, under Ordinance 10450. 15 B. The. metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Phase II 16 amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies on August 15, 1994, under Ordinance 17 11446. Ordinance 14656 , 18 C. The Growth Management Planning Council met on June 16, 1999, and i 19 adopted Motion 99-3, recommending amendments to the King County 2012 - i 20 Countywide Planning Policies addressing the long-term protection of agricultural 21 production districts; adopting new policies LU-2A and LU-213, revising the interim 22 potential annexation area map so that the lower green river valley agricultural production 23 district is not within the potential annexation area of any city, and drawing the urban 24 growth area boundary around the lower green river valley agricultural production district 25 to clarify that it is outside of the urban growth area. 26 E. The King County Council adopted Motion 11208 on May 21, 2001, requesting 27 that the GMPC review and reconsider its Motion 99-3 and provide for a thorough public 28 process, including opportunities for public testimony. 29 D. The Growth Management Planning Council met on September 26, 2001 and 30 adopted Motion 01-2, reaffirming Motion 99-3. j 31 SECTION 2. Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 are i 32 each hereby amended to read as follows: 33 Phase II. 34 A. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning 35 Policies attached to Ordinance 11446 are hereby approved and adopted. 36 B. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 37 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027. 38 C. The Phase H Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 39 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421. 2 Ordinance 14656 40 D. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide PIanning 41 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260. 42 E. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 43 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415. 44 F. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 45 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858. 46 G. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 — Countywide Planning 47 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390. 48 H. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 — Countywide Planning 49 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391. 50 I. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 —'Countywide Planning 51 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392. 52 J. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 — Countywide Planning 53 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to this ordinance 54 SECTION 3. Ordinance 10450, Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040 are 55 each hereby amended to read as follows: 56 Ratification for unincorporated King County. 57 A. Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 10450 for the purposes 58 specified are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 59 B. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 60 .10840 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 61 C. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 62 11061 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 3 Ordinance 14656 63 D. The Phase II amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning 64 Policies adopted by Ordinance 11446 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of 65 unincorporated King County. i 66 E. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide PIanning Policies, as 67 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027 are hereby ratified on behalf of the 68 population of unincorporated King County. 69 F. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 70 shown by Attachment I to Ordinance 12421, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 71 population of unincorporated King County. 72 G. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 73 shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 74 population of unincorporated King County. 75 H. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 76 shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415, are hereby ratified on behalf of I 77 the population of unincorporated King County. 78 I. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 79 shown by. Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858, are hereby ratified on behalf of 80 the population of unincorporated King County. 81 1 The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 82 shown by Attachment I to Ordinance 14390, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 83 population of unincorporated King County. 4 Ordinance 14656 84 K. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Count ywide Planning Policies, as 85 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 86 population of unincorporated King County. 87 L. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 88 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 89 population of unincorporated King County. 90 M. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies as 5 Ordinance 14656 91 shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to this ordinance are hereby ratified on behalf of the 92 population of unincorporated King County. 93 Ordinance 14656 was introduced on 3/17/2003 and passed by the Metropolitan King County Council on 5/19/2003, by the following vote: Yes: 12 - Ms. Sullivan, Ms. Edmonds, Mr. von Reichbauer, Ms. Lambert, Mr. Phillips, Mr. Pelz, Mr. McKenna, Mr. Constantine, Mr. Gossett, Ms. Hague, Mr. Irons and Ms. Patterson No: 0 Excused: 0 KING COUNTY COUNCIL KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON I Cynthia Sullivan, Chair w ATTEST: - i y Cz Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council C APPROVED this 36"Nday of , 2003. Rona , Counh' Executi Attachments L GMPC Motion 99-3, 2. GMPC Motion 01-2 rel September 26, 2001 /pr Sponsored By: MOTION NO. 01-2 Attachment 2 2003-0127 14656 Executive Committee 2 A MOTION reaffirming Motion 99-3 passed by the GMPC on June 16, 3 1999 amending the Countywide Planning Policies to add new policies that 4 address the long-term governance of Agricultural Production Districts. 5 6 WHEREAS, The Growth Management Act requires the maintenance, enhancement and 7 conservation of agricultural industries and lands through a variety of methods and programs; 8 9 WHEREAS, King County residents have supported efforts to preserve good farmland and active 10 farms for the value of local crops, dairy and livestock and for scenic and historic values; 11 12 WHEREAS, King County, through the Farmlands Preservation Program, has purchased the 13 development rights of 12,600 acres of farmland and has established the Agricultural Production 14 Districts (APDs) to further protect these and adjacent prime agricultural lands; 15 16 WHEREAS, the Lower Green River APD is completely surrounded by Urban designated lands and 17 as such is under immense pressure for development and annexation; and 18 19 WHEREAS, King County and the City of Auburn have signed an interlocal agreement that 20 removes the southern portion of the Lower Green APD out of the city's potential annexation area. 21 THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY HEREBY 22 MOVES AS FOLLOWS: 23 24 Reaffirm the unanimous vote by this Council on June 16, 1999 to add the following new 25 Countywide Planning Policies: 26 27 LU-2A Designated Agricultural Production District lands shall not be annexed by 28 cities. 29 30 LU-213 The Lower Green River Agricultural Production District is a regionally 31 designated resource that is to remain in unincorporated King County. 32 Preservation of the Lower Green River Agricultural Production District will 33 provide an urban separator as surrounding Urban areas are annexed and 34 developed. King County may contract with other jurisdictions to provide 35 some local services to this area as appropriate. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1 14656 In the event that this motion is ratified by the member jurisdictions of Growth Management Planning Council, then the Interim Potential Annexation Area Map shall be revised accordingly and the Urban Growth Boundary will be drawn around the Lower Green Agricultural Production District (APD) to clarify that the API) is outside of the Urban area. ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on September 26, 2001 in open session. Ron Sims, h ' , Growth Management Planning Council 1JGMPG2001GMPGModonO1-2.doc - 2 - 01 Metropolitan King County Council Growth Management and Unincorporated Areas Committee Staff Report Agenda Item: 10 Name: Lauren Smith Proposed Ordinance: 2003-0127 Date: March 18, 2003 Attending: Paul Reitenbach, King County DDES Kevin Wright, King County PAO SUBJECT: Proposed Ordinance 2003-0127 adopts amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies addressing the long term protection of Agricultural Production Districts, and ratifies the amended Countywide Planning Policies on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. BACKGROUND: The Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) is a formal body comprised of elected officials from King County, Seattle, Bellevue, the Suburban Cities, and Special Districts. The GMPC was created in 1990 in response to a provision in the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requiring cities and counties to work together to adopt Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs). Under GMA, countywide planning policies serve as the framework for each individual jurisdiction's comprehensive plan, and ensure regional consistency with respect to land use planning efforts. The GMPC drafted the CPPs, which were then adopted by the King County Council and ratified by the cities. Changes to the CPPs are recommended by the GMPC, adopted by the King County Council, and ratified by the cities. GMPC Actions In June of 1999, the GMPC adopted Substitute Motion 99-3, recommending amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies, as follows: Recommendation #1. Add two new policies addressing the long-term governance of Agricultural Production Districts: LU-2A Designated Agricultural Production Districts shall not be annexed by cities. LU-213 The Lower Green River Valley Agricultural Production District is a regionally designated resource that is to remain in unincorporated King County. Preservation of the Lower Green River Valley Agricultural Production District will provide an urban separator as surrounding urban areas are annexed and developed. King County may contract with other jurisdictions to provide some local services to this area as appropriate. C:\WIND0WS\TEMP\2003-0127 (CPP Amendments - Lower Green River Valley APD)(3-18.03).doc 5/21/2003 8:51 AM Recommendation #2. Amend the Potential Annexation Area (PAA) Map in the CPPs so that the Lower Green River Valley APD does not appear within the PAA boundaries of any jurisdiction. Recommendation #3. Amend the Urban Growth Area map by drawing the Urban Growth Area Boundary around the Lower Green River Valley APD. This is to clarify its classification as long- term resource land, and to emphasize that although it is located west of the main urban -rural boundary line, it is not considered urban. King County Council Actions In 1999, the King County Council amended the King County Comprehensive Plan to be consistent with the GMPC recommendations contained in Motion 99-3, by adopting policies R- 513 and R-544 (see below), and by drawing the Urban Growth Area Boundary around the Lower Green River Valley APD (see Attachment 2). R-513 Designated Forest and Agricultural Production District lands shall not be annexed by cities. R-544 The Lower Green River Agricultural Production District is a regionally designated resource that is to remain in unincorporated King County. The Lower Green River Agricultural Production District functions as an urban separator between the cities of Kent and Auburn. King County may contract with other jurisdictions to provide some local services to this area as appropriate. In 2000, the King County Council further amended the King County Comprehensive Plan by adopting Policy R-543, which also supports the GMPC's recommendations in Motion 99-3: R-543 King County commits to preserve Agricultural Production District parcels in or near the Urban Growth Area because of their high production capabilities, their proximity to markets, and their value as open space. Finally, in 2001 the King County Council considered the adoption of Proposed Ordinance 2002- 0256, which would have amended the CPPs consistent with the recommendations of the GMPC and with the changes already made to the King County Comprehensive Plan. However, because the County was engaged in negotiations to purchase certain properties within the Lower Green River Valley APD, and out of concerns that the GMPC had adopted their recommendations in the absence of a quorum and without an adequate public review process, the Council did not adopt the Proposed Ordinance. Instead, the Council adopted Motion 11208 (see Attachment 3), which remanded the GMPC motion back to the GMPC for further review and reconsideration. Motion 11208 also directed the County Executive to complete negotiations with property owners in the Lower Green River Valley APD in the earliest possible timeframe. On September 26, 2001 the GMPC reconsidered its actions with respect to Motion 99-3, and via the adoption of Motion 01-2, reaffirmed those actions. On November 20, 2002 King County executed the fee simple purchase of what is known as the Nelson property in the Lower Green River Valley APD, thus fulfilling the second mandate of Motion 11208. C:\WIND0WS\TEMP\2003-0127 (CPP Amendments - Lower Green River Valley APD)(3-18-03).doc 5/21/2003 8:51 AM With these two actions complete, the King County Council is asked to consider once again amending the Countywide Planning Policies as recommended by the GMPC in Motions 99-3 and 01-2. SUMMARY: Proposed Ordinance 2003-0127 would amend the Countywide Planning Policies by: ♦ Adding policies LU-2A and LU-213 addressing the long-term governance of Agricultural Production Districts; ♦ Amending the Interim Potential Annexation Area Map to illustrate that the Lower Green River Valley APD is not within the PAA of any jurisdiction; and ♦ Amending the land use map in the CPPs to illustrate that the Lower Green River Valley APD is outside the boundaries of the Urban Growth Area. Additionally, the ordinance would ratify the changes on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County, as required by Countywide Planning Policy FW-1. Amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies become effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution by at least 30% of the city and county governments representing 70% of the population of King County according to the Interlocal agreement. A city shall be deemed to have ratified the countywide planning policy unless, within 90 days of adoption by King County, the city by legislative action disapproves the Countywide Planning Policy. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Proposed Ordinance 2003-0127, with attachments 2. Map: Lower Green River Valley Agricultural Production District 3. King County Motion 11208, Adopted May 21, 2000 C:\WIND0W&TEMP\2003-0127 (CPP Amendments - Lower Green River Valley APD)(3.18-03).doc 5/21/2003 8:51 AM CITY OF RENTON, WASIENGTON _ DRAFT RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, RATIFYING AMENDMENTS TO THE COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act, RCW 36.70A. 210 mandates the development and adoption of Countywide Planning Policies for King County, and WHEREAS, the King County, the City of Seattle, the City of Bellevue and the Suburban Cities of King County have met jointly as the Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) to develop and recommend Countywide Planning Policies; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton has ratified the Countywide Planning Policies and subsequent amendments, and WHEREAS, Countywide Planning Policy FW-1 Step 9 provides for an amendment process to change the Planning Policies as may be necessary from time to time, and WHEREAS, the amendment process requires ratification of proposed amendments by at least 30 percent of the City and County governments representing 70 percent of the population in King County, and WHEREAS, the City participated in study sessions with the GMPC and reviewed the final amendments prior to adoption by the GMPC, and WHEREAS, the Planning and Development Committee of the City Council reviewed the proposed amendments June 5 and September 12, 2002, and August 7, 2003, as they pertain to the Renton Comprehensive Plan, RESOLUTION NO. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The proposed amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies are consistent with the adopted City Comprehensive Plan and the adopted City Business Plan. SECTION III. The best interests and general welfare of the City of Renton would be served by ratification of the following amendments approved by the King County Council and the Growth Management Planning Council: a) Ordinance 2003-0123 (GMPC Motion 02-4) adding a new policy to support ongoing water supply planning, b) Ordinance 2003-0124 (GMPC Motions 02-1, 02-2 and 02-3) adopting new household and employment targets for the period 2001-2022, c) Ordinance 2003-0125 (GMPC Motion 02-5) amending the Urban Separator map to reflect negotiated modifications to the Renton Urban Separator, d) Ordinance 2003-0126 (GMPC Motion 02-6) designating Totem Lake as an Urban Center, and e) Ordinance 2003-0127 (GMPC Motion 01-2) addressing the long-term protection of Agricultural Production Districts, described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 2003. NJ RESOLUTION NO. Bonnie L Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 12002. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Jesse Tanner, Mayor 3 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board.. Finance & IS Dept. Staff Contact...... Victoria Runkle, Administrator Subject: Update of Resolution Re: Authorizing Signature for Depositories and Electronic Fund Transfers on Behalf of and in the Name of the City of Renton Exhibits: Resolution AI #: For Agenda of: August 4, 2003 Agenda Status Consent .............. Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Ordinance ............. Resolution............ Old Business........ New Business....... Study Sessions...... Information......... G. XX Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept......... XX Council concur Finance Dept...... XX Other ............... Fiscal Impact: $0 Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The proposed Resolution updates Section IV of Resolution 3603. Section IV identifies the names, titles, and authority level of Finance staff that can initiate and/or approve electronic fund transfers for the purposes of investing, cash management, and accomplishing authorized City business in the City of Renton's name. The updates are due to personnel changes and are as follows: Delete Finance staff member Gina Jarvis. Add Finance staff member Linda Parks with initiate and approve authority. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Finance staff recommends that Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the proposed Resolution that updates Section IV of Resolution 3603. Rentonnet/asnbill/ bh CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORAFT RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING SIGNATURE FOR DEPOSITORIES AND ELECTRONIC FUND TRANSFERS ON BEHALF OF AND IN THE NAME OF THE CITY OF RENTON. WHEREAS, the City of Renton maintains one or more accounts at one or more qualified public depositories including the state operated Local Government Investment Pool for primary banking, investing, or third party trust agreement purposes; and WHEREAS, the City's appointed Finance & Information Services Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to open and maintain these accounts as required from time to time on behalf of and in the name of the City of Renton; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The depositories are hereby authorized to honor and pay checks, drafts, and similar instruments in the name of the City of Renton and signed by any one of the following officers and officials of the City of Renton: Title Name Mayor Jesse Tanner Finance & Information Services Administrator Victoria Runkle SECTION II. Any of the above named officers or officials are further authorized to endorse any such checks, drafts, or other instruments made payable to the City of Renton for the purpose of depositing same into the City's accounts. 1 RESOLUTION NO. SECTION III. The designated depository for the account in the name of City of Renton Municipal Court (Municipal Court account) is hereby authorized to honor and pay checks, drafts, and similar instruments signed by the Court Services Director or Municipal Court Judge. The Director or Judge are further authorized to endorse checks, drafts, or other instruments made payable to the City of Renton for the purpose of depositing the same into the Municipal Court account. Title Court Services Director Muncipal Court Judge SECTION IV. Name Joseph T. McGuire Terry L. Jurado The following individuals are authorized to initiate and/or approve electronic fund transfers for the purposes of disbursing and depositing City funds for the purposes of investing, cash management, and accomplishing authorized City business in the City's name: Title Name Initiate Approve Finance & Information Services Administrator Victoria Runkle No Yes Fiscal Services Director Elaine Gregory Yes Yes Finance Analyst Supervisor Linda Parks Yes Yes Finance Analyst Linda Dixon Yes No SECTION V. There shall be no obligation on the part of the depositories to see the application of funds in any case whatsoever, and that a true copy of this resolution be certified and delivered to each said depository at the time any such account is opened on behalf of the City of Renton. SECTION VI. Section IV of Resolution No. 3603, passed and approved on November 25, 2002, is hereby repealed. 2 RESOLUTION NO. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney day of , 2003. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk day of , 2003. Jesse Tanner, Mayor CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBMITTING DATA: Dept/Div/Board.. HEARING EXAMINER Staff Contact... Fred J. Kaufman, ext. 6515 SUBJECT: Brookefield Preliminary Plat File No. LUA-03-003,PP,ECF EXHIBITS: Hearing Examiner's Report and Recommendation i FOR AGENDA OF: August 4, 2003 AGENDA STATUS: Consent ......... XX Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Ordinance....... Resolution...... Old Business.... New Business.... Study Session... Other........... RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPROVALS: Council Concur Legal Dept...... Finance Dept.... Other........... FISCAL IMPACT: N/A Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.. Amount Budgeted........ Revenue Generated... The Hearing Examiner's Report and Recommendation on Brookefield Preliminary Plat was published on March 25, 2003. Mark Avakian filed a Request for Reconsideration and Appeal to City Council on April 8, 2003. The Hearing Examiner's report and Recommendation on the Reconsideration was published on April 22, 2003. On July 10, Mr. Avakian withdrew his request for an appeal. The Examiner recommends approval of the proposed preliminary plat, subject to the conditions outlined on page 9 of the April 22, 2003 Examiner's Report and Recommendation. This office notes that the conditions placed on this project are to be met at later stages of the platting process. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Brookefield Preliminary Plat. April 22, 2003 REVISED DECISION OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION APPLICANT: EJ Schmidt PO Box 2670 Renton, WA 98056 Brookefield Preliminary Plat File No: LUA-03-003,PP,ECF LOCATION: 1024 & 1050 Hoquiam Avenue NE SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Reconsideration of Subdivision with regard to storm drainage handling and accessibility to Preliminary Plat. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on April 22, 2003. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, and examining available information on file with the application, the Examiner reopened the hearing for additional information on handling of storm water and access to site and how City policy affects the site as follows: MINUTES FROM ORIGINAL HEARING The following minutes are a summary of the March 11, 2003 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 9:00 a. n. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original application, proof of posting, proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Neighborhood Detail Map Exhibit No. 3: Preliminary Plat Plan Exhibit No. 4: Boundary & Topographic Exhibit No. 5: Tree Cutting/Landelearing Exhibit No. 6: Preliminary Grading Plan Exhibit No. 7: Zoning Map Brookefield Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-03-003,PP,ECF April 22, 2003 Page 2 The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Jason Jordan, Associate Planner, Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98055. The project is located on the east side of Hoquiam Avenue and is comprised of four legal tax parcels. The applicant has proposed to subdivide a 7.16-acre site. The site is within the Residential — 8 (R-8) dwelling units per acre zone. The proposal would create 47 lots intended for the eventual development of detached single-family homes. There is an existing single family that is proposed to remain on what would become new lot 30. The home proposed to be demolished is located southerly of the home that is proposed to remain and is a smaller home located directly south of the proposed detention tract. The subject site is generally flat and characterized by having very little slope. The site gradually slopes from east to west at less then one percent. There are what appears to be man made berms located in the southern property boundary that do slope in excess of 25 percent and appear to be part of a rock and water outfall system that was part of the landscape design. Access to the site is proposed off of Hoquiam Avenue via an internal u-shaped road that would serve all the lots except for the existing residence, which already has access onto Hoquiam Avenue. The applicant is proposing leaving that drive onto Hoquiam Avenue and staff does not object to that at this time. The proposed lots would range in size from 4,500 square feet to 16,581 square feet. The project was reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) who issued a Determination of Non - Significance Mitigated (DNS-M). The DNS-M included nine mitigation measures. There were no appeals filed. Conditions one through five were related to erosion control, condition six required use of the 1998 King County Storm Water Manual, and conditions seven, eight and nine were the standard fire, traffic and parks mitigation fees. The subject site is designated Residential Single Family (RSF) on the Comprehensive Plan Map. The RSF is intended to promote and enhance single-family neighborhoods. The proposal is consistent with this designation in that it would allow for the future construction of up to 46 single-family homes. The proposal has a density of 7.93 dwelling units per acre, which is inside the range prescribed in the Comprehensive Plan. With respect to the underlying zoning designation, the density after deduction of the rights -of -way is 7.93 dwelling units per acre. All lots meet width, depth and area requirements. The proposal meets all front, rear and side yard setback requirements. Each of the proposed lots would support the construction of one detached residential unit. Accessory structures are permitted at a maximum number of two at 720 square feet or one per lot at 1,000 square feet. The proposed lot lines are configured such that the existing single-family residence would be located entirely on lot 30 of the proposed preliminary plat. All other outbuildings or structures not located within lot 30 would be demolished as part this development. In order to ensure that all structures are demolished as part of this Brookefield Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-03-003,PP,ECF April 22, 2003 Page 3 proposal staff is recommending a condition that all structures not located within lot 30 be demolished or removed from the site prior to final plat approval. Side lot lines are to be at right angles to street lines and each lot must have access to a public street or road. All side lot lines are at right angles with the exception of the far corner lots, which are lots 12 and 18. They are not served directly off of the public street. They are accessed by a private drive over the neighboring lots. The proposed subdivision would gain access from Hoquiam Avenue NE via a new 42-foot wide public street. The applicant is not required to dedicate any additional right-of-way for Hoquiam Avenue; however, they would be required to pave an additional five feet abutting the plat and provide curb, gutter and sidewalk. The proposed internal public road would also require curb, gutter, sidewalks and street lighting. In order to insure safe and efficient access staff recommends requiring the applicant to establish a Homeowners Association or maintenance agreement for the two private drives as a condition of preliminary plat approval. Staff also recommends a project condition requiring the applicant to install a private road sign indicating addresses served from the private drives at the intersections so that emergency access vehicles on the u-shaped internal public road have an idea what the addresses are for lots 12 and 18 off of the private drive. The applicant submitted a geotechnical report, which was reviewed as part of the environmental review. The geotechnical engineer concludes that the existing soils are suitable for the 47 lot proposed development. Temporary erosion control plans and the use of Best Management Practices would serve to mitigate potential erosion and off -site sediment impacts. The project application includes a construction mitigation plan, which is subject to final approval prior to the issuance of any construction permits. In addition the ERC did place five erosion control conditions on the project along with the use of the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual. The subject site is currently developed with two single-family lots of which one is proposed to remain. The surrounding area includes other single-family residential development under the same R-8 zoning and similar King County zoning development standards. Hazen High School is located west of the subject site across Hoquiam Avenue. Police, Fire, Recreation and the School District all indicated that provided that the applicant pay the required mitigation fees they could provide services to the proposed development. The applicant would be required to submit a drainage report per the 1998 Manual. The project would be required to provide water quality and detention. The applicant is proposing a combination of settling basin infiltration vault that would be located in the easement behind lots 31-35. Staff recommends a condition of project approval requiring the applicant to have all maintenance agreement and easements in place prior to final plat approval. A surface water system development charge based on $525 per new single family lot would be required prior to the issuance of any construction permits. The applicant would be required to construct an eight -inch sewer main extension from NE 10°i Street across the full frontage of the property and into the new plat. The project is located within the Water District 90 boundary. In conclusion, staff recommends approval of the project subject to conditions previously discussed Brookefield Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-03-003,PP,ECF April 22, 2003 Page 4 E.J. Schmidt, PO Box 2670, Renton, WA 98056 stated that there are no objections to the staff report. She added that she believes that the drainage basin is Honey Creek. She does have a copy of the water availability certificate from Water District 90. Mark Avakian, H465 146"' Avenue Southeast, Renton, WA 98059 stated that his property is north and east of the site. He asked about the flow dispersion trench, what it is and voiced his concern that it will flow onto his property. The creek that flows through his property is known as Honeydew Creek. Kayren Kittrick, Development Services, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 stated that in regard to the flow dispersion trench, they are allowed when it is a flow that is going to go where the natural drainage channels are. This would be looked at closely to make sure there would not be any erosion and it would be only an emergency overflow as opposed to a general way to get rid of the water. Access to Mr. Avakian's parcel could be through a proposed 20 foot easement but it could mean that it would have to paved to the 20 foot wide depending on which Fire Department is involved. In regard to the School District, the new proposed street is just north of the large drive that was under appeal several times. Transportation was asked to look at it and felt that no change needs to be made currently because of the improvements that will be required of this developer. The Transportation Department will be taking a very close look at this to determine if they need to re -channel the street. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and DO further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 9:46 a.m. MINUTES The following mintttes are a summary of the April 22, 2003 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday, April 22, 2003, at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 2: Neighborhood Detail Map Exhibit No. 3: Preliminary Plat Plan Exhibit No. 8: Revised Preliminary Grading and Utility Planning Map Exhibit No. 9: Personal Site Drawing from Mr. Avakian Exhibit No. 10: Series of photographs showing Honey Creek and surrounding property This is a reopened hearing to allow for additional information on issues raised by neighboring property owners and a request for reconsideration on the storm water discharge issue, which is the only issue to be discussed today. It is a recommendation to the City Council, they will take final action at a future City Council Meeting. All original parties of record will continue as parties of record. Brookefield Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-03-003,PP,ECF April 22, 2003 Page 5 Staff Report review by Jason Jordan, Senior Planner, Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98055. Applicant requests Preliminary Plat approval for a 47-lot subdivision on a 7.16-acre site located in a Residential-8 dwelling unit per acre zoning designation. The proposal would create lots intended for detached single-family development. The parcel in question is located on the east side of the subject site in the northeast corner. There are two issues at hand in this reconsideration request: one, how drainage will be handled, and second, access to the neighboring property. In regards to the first issue and erosion control, the applicant revised the plan. The applicant now proposes to tight line the storm drain system through an easement to the neighbor's property to the north, the Miller property. Staff is in agreement with the proposed tight line system, that is a better method for storm drainage control. The applicant should not be locked into that location, if an easement can be obtained from the Miller property that would certainly work. If not, then they will need to obtain an easement from Mr. Avakian or any other neighbor, as long as they can get down to the stream, that is what we are supporting, not in a specific location. The Examiner stated that an easement across some property is necessary to allow the tight line system otherwise the plat could not be developed without some other means of dealing with storm water. Regarding the transportation access that Mr. Avakian seeks, it appears that the plat is landlocked from all directions besides being bisected in a slight angle by Honey Creek. Currently Mr. Avakian gains access from his eastern neighboring property owner through their site onto his site. He has a single-family residence which is located on the eastern side of Honey Creek on his property. The creek physically divides Mr. Avakian's property, he has access to the eastern side, but not the ,vestern. Mr. Avakian's property is located in King County, not the City of Renton. There would be problems getting permits from the County to build a bridge to cross the stream. Mr. Avakian would like to have access over perhaps Lot 18 or 19 to his western property line. Staff has reviewed this issue, and is not recommending that the applicant be required to provide access to that property. David Cayton, Core Designs, 14711 NE 29°i Place, Ste. 101, Bellevue, WA 98007, engineers for the project. We modified the plans to a tight line system extending off -site and it will require an easement. There are several alternatives to getting a tight line system down to the drainage channel in the creek. We agree with the City's comments. Mark Avakian, I I465-146h Avenue SE, Renton, WA 98059. It appears that the tight line will satisfy the drainage issue, however, I still have the issue of land locking my property. There has always been great concern with protecting the creek, 50-foot setbacks, silt barriers, all trees to be left in place within the protected area of the creek, and easements prohibiting development to the east of the creek and the remaining parts of Tract A were previously required. The County will not allow a road to be built across the creek. Mr. Avakian presented pictures of the creek as it runs through his property. There currently is access to the eastern side of the property through 146`h Avenue SE, a King County street. Access to the western side of the property has been through permission by Mr. Wilson, a previous property owner, and later Mr. Smith, the current property owner. I now will not be able to drive over the creek and with the development going in, I will have no access to my property. The Examiner stated that Mr. Avakian may have to purchase access. The Code and all regulations will be checked to see what Mr. Avakian may be entitled to. Mr. Avakian questioned the legality of developments that will essentially land lock his property and the adjacent property owner. Jason Jordan. after the preliminary plat is done and all construction permits in, and the properties are recorded and sold off individually, Mr. Avakian can approach Lots 18 and 19 and ask them for an easement to cross over their drive. Code currently allows a 20-foot drive to serve two lots. Lot 19 technically gets it access from the road so it does not count the way we review it. Brookefield Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-03-003,PP,ECF April 22, 2003 Page 6 The Examiner asked for the technical limitations that were raised initially in the dispersion trench as far as distance, it's run, and whether an easement is required for that or not? Kayren Kittrick, Development Services, 1055 S. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98056 stated that a lot of research has been done by the City as to whether or not an easement is required in that type of situation. City of Renton might not require an easement, however, Mr. Avakian's property is in King County and King County regularly and routinely requires an easement for dispersal trenches. The design as presented at the first hearing is only preliminary and would not have met the standards of design, including that they are only supposed to be 50 feet long at maximum, instead of the 100 feet plus shown on the drawing. There would have been multiple dispersion trenches, with possibly multiple easements. That is the advantage of the applicant going to the Miller property, it is in the City of Renton, no further jurisdiction is needed. The proposed trench was never a favored option within the City, we do have occasions where that is the only option available. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 9:30 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following revised Findings, Conclusions & Recommendations from the March 25 Hearing: FINDINGS: The applicant, E. J. Schmidt, filed a request for approval of a 47-lot Preliminary Plat. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit 41. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non -Significance - Mitigated (DNS-M) for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. The subject site is located at 1024 and 1050 Hoquiam Avenue. The subject site is located on the east side of Hoquiam Avenue just north of NE 1 Oth Street if extended. Two existing homes are located on the subject site and one home would be retained on what is proposed to be Lot 30. The second home and other outbuildings would be removed. Honey Creek is located on property east of the subject site. The subject site is located out of the creek's impact zone. 7. The subject site is approximately 7.16 acres or 312,016 square feet in area. The parcel is rectangular. The parcel is approximately 631 feet deep (east to west) and approximately 494 feet wide. The site slopes downward to the east approximately one percent (1%) from approximately 470 feet to 454 feet. A berm and hillock were artificially created along the south and southeast margin of the subject site. Brookefield Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-03-003,PP,ECF April 22, 2003 Page 7 9. The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 4819 enacted in December 1999. 10. The subject site is currently zoned R-8 (Single Family - 8 dwelling units/acre). The site east of the subject site is located in unincorporated King County and is zoned for similar single-family uses with the King County R-4 zoning. IL . The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of single-family uses. 12. The applicant proposes dividing the subject site into 47 lots for the development of detached single- family uses. The lots will be arrayed along the inside and outside of a U-shaped roadway. The new road would loop fi-om two points along Hoquiam entering the subject site approximately 90 feet south of its north property line and 90 north of its south property line. The loop or U-shaped road will create a two-tier block of lots on the interior and a single tier arrayed on the outside of the loop. 13. Two lots, Proposed Lots 12 and 18, at the southeast and northeast corners of the subject site will be served by two 20-foot wide easements over their respective neighboring lots, Proposed Lots 11 and 17. 14. The new road will be 42 feet wide. Staff did review the north intersection of the new roadway at Hoquiam Avenue for possible impacts on the high school. Staff believed that the intersection and potential impacts were reasonable, although not perfect, and the school district did not have any comments on the issue. 15. The lots range in size from 4,500 square feet to approximately 16,581 square feet. After deducting for roads, approximately 53,703 square feet, the net acreage of 258,313 square feet would result in an overall density of 7.93 homes per acre. 16. Each new home is expected to generate approximately 9.57 vehicle trips per day or approximately 431 trips for the 45 new homes (credit for the original two homes). 17. The development would generate approximately 21 school age children who would attend schools in the Renton School District. The students would be spread across the grades and be assigned on a space available basis. 18. Utilities will be provided by the City and Water District 90. The applicant has a water availability acknowledgement for domestic water. 19. A detention system will be located in an approximately 50 foot wide by 290 foot long storm water easement that runs through the south ends of Proposed Lots 31 through 35. Request for Reconsideration: 20. After the original recommendation was issued, the neighbor east of the subject site submitted a Request for Reconsideration. In that request the neighbor objected to the use of a flow dispersal system to discharge storm water onto his property as well as the lack of access to the western portion of his property. He noted that the proposed dispersal system would adversely affect his property. Be stated that its length of 160 feet along a common property line with the subject site was in excess of the 50 foot length that is permitted by the 1998 King County Manual used by the City for the proposed development. He also noted that the Manual requires an easement before storm water can be released Brookefield Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-03-003,PP,ECF April 22, 2003 Page 8 on his property. As for the access issue, he noted that his property is divided by Honey Creek. His home is located on the east side of the creek and has access from the east. But if he were to subdivide his property, he noted that he probably would not be permitted to bridge the creek and that there would be no means to access the western portion of his property. Upon receiving this Request for Reconsideration, the matter was reopened to allow additional testimony and evidence on the two issues of storm water handling and access. 21. The neighbor's property is located east of the site and is located in unincorporated King County, not within the City limits. It may be governed by different standards than the City imposes regarding the need for an easement. 22. At the reconvened public hearing, the applicant had revised its plans to incorporate a tight line system to handle the storm water. The system would collect all storm water that would have been conveyed to the neighbor's property into a closed system. A pipe would then convey the water directly to Honey Creek. It was proposed to cross a third -party property located entirely within the City's boundaries potentially simplifying the need for any easement. This proposal was not final and an agreement was not reached at the time of the hearing. Staff noted that the tight line was preferred in this case. 23. The neighbor's property, as noted above, is divided by Honey Creek. Due to terrain, the creek's sensitive nature and King County regulations, it appears that accessing the western portion of this neighbor's property by building any crossing of the creek would be problematic. The neighbor has sought some access rights to the western portion of his property from the subject site. Conclusions: The proposed plat appears to serve the public use and interest. The plat will create additional housing choices in an area well served by existing urban services. By re -dividing the larger lots it will create new housing in a location that should help to avoid urban sprawl. 2. The development is compatible with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The single- family homes will clearly increase urban noise and traffic to the subject site and area. These impacts are expected and were anticipated by the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed density of 7.93 dwelling units per acre meets the goals and objectives of both the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan. It is also compatible with some of the newer lots in the City. The lots provided are reasonably rectangular lots. 4. Staff has reported that the site can be provided the necessary sewer, water and storm water services. Staff has indicated that a tight line method of conveying storm water should be used to serve the storm water needs of the subject site. While a final agreement had not been crafted, it appears that a tight line method would be the best alternative to allow the development of the subject site. The development of the subject site will be permitted but conditioned on the applicant using a tight line system to convey storm water to Honey Creek and providing the necessary legal documents permitting a tight line system to cross property between the subject site and Honey Creek and to convey storm water across that or those intervening third -party properties. While this office may sympathize with the neighbor's desire to achieve access to the western portion of his property, nothing in the record or regulations requires an exaction of this type from the current applicant. The neighbor owns a unique parcel but that does not require his neighbor, the subject site's applicant, to provide access. The neighbor's property is a legal lot and apparently has legal access. If Brookefield Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-03-003,PP,ECF April 22, 2003 Page 9 subdivision of that parcel makes sense, and currently, that would be a question for King County, then at that time the county can make a decision on access. The parties are clearly free to make their own agreements for access at this time or in the future if conditions change. 6. In conclusion, the proposed preliminary plat should be approved by the City Council subject to the conditions enumerated below. Recommendation: The Preliminary Plat is approved subject to the following conditions: The applicant shall obtain demolition permits and complete all necessary inspections and approvals for all existing structures not located on what would become new Lot 30. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to recording of the final plat. 2. A homeowner's association or maintenance agreement shall be created concurrently with the recording of the final plat in order to establish maintenance responsibilities for all private drives. A draft of the document(s) shall be submitted to the City of Renton Development Services Division for review and approval by the City Attorney and Property Services section prior to the recording of the final plat. The applicant shall be required to install a "Private Road" sign with addresses being served from the private drives at the intersections of the private roads and the proposed 42-foot wide internal pubic street, prior to final plat approval. The applicant shall be required to have all drainage facility maintenance agreements and easements ready to record, prior to final plat approval. The applicant shall comply with the conditions imposed by the ERC. The applicant shall use a tight line system to convey storm water to Honey Creek and shall provide the necessary legal documents permitting a tight line system to cross property between the subject site and Honey Creek and to convey storm water across that or those intervening third -party properties. ORDERED THIS 19th day of May, 2003. FRED J. KAUF N 14EARING EXA INER Brookefield Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-03-003,PP,ECF April 22, 2003 Page 10 TRANSMITTED THIS 19th day of May, 2003 to the parties of record: Jason Jordan 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Kayren Kittrick 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Tim Burkhardt 19201 108'h Ave SE 4201 Renton, WA 98055 David Cayton Core Design 14711 NE 29'h Place, Ste. 101 Bellevue, WA 98007 EJ Schmidt Fletcher Barnes PO Box 2670 PO Box 2670 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 John L. Smith Mark Avakian PO Box 2670 11465 146'h Ave SE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98059 Kurt Wilson Verdie Querin Harbour Homes 23410 1601h Ave SE 1010 S 336" St, Suite 305 Kent, WA 98042 Federal Way, WA 98003 TRANSMITTED THIS 19th day of May; 2003 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Members, Renton Planning Commission Larry Rude, Fire Marshal Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Transportation Systems Division Utilities System Division South County Journal Gregg Zimmerman, Plan/Bldg/PW Admin. Neil Watts, Development Services Director Alex Pietsch, Econ. Dev. Administrator Larry Meckling, Building Official Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section I OOGof the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., June 2, 2003. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. An appeal must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., June 2, 2003. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants, the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in Brookefield Preliminary Plat Fite No.: LUA-03-003,PP,ECF April 22, 2003 Page 1 I private with any decision -maker concerning the proposal. Decision -makers in the land use process include both the Nearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. -7 c I E5 - 9 T23N ME ,-..-.,uLivd i Ave, ivy, RH-N Field Ave.AL SE t-Cj If C- ry-) 14� CIO kV6 142nd Ave. Hoguiam- AVe 'NEI 142nd q ;co Li 14 th Ave. SE] IQ _LJ1 ------- 15 th Ave- SP. i - Air 27 1 146th Ave. SE IME SSt dvW "tl'Y134 dOOMJ09H913N d v W ,111N1 0 I7 O Y� nan ri tl pr <i F i N 0 1 e 3 L llK YO Ylauia+e 1. nou•O i •,TI/oJ °v •••ran tmnla� ��m alalrt+a'oTv rvat'a+r u.n ° aYoo Nv / • M'/m iO1rOY 1 G' 1nq, laau• rtn a10.1 ,.11,IN "' aT Yak •1rM aui,lan0 f•'L q .Uipnpo Lan • ni tTnlarr oT°n •10, lr OOCIRtluOo LOO YT�OY Op•anelV•O a tYT'rnG R'l '.IIIpNO lin e� vW O•.•n wOIMlY q ur0 'WIr1 i7a Oy a ,.l 31d�566S Mi,O.pYa, •Yadi'N:OwtNO Y y�k� i.r•YOin iYre •. •6YT Rp YO A rUf •e< ^rp• ill• Ian 1%'� w Iv Y•10 aTYM`.evY CIN Y.°�> Yel�., Y.L.m Lr „•>y Ya.'}rm',..a • .�,.Y N r.Yyl� a...r, Y° . ,.'„ • A rfol'rp �•oY o�wrr . ruYon ct Yln•rrnol'w ra>u�ie q �araao .ra•ro.• r..0 a• ♦ rwr• .� Y r « i, • • .. o«o ,• L�eoJ.ao']•']n• Ontrr p SNOIlC1f17�D'7 ,IlISNH4 S')NIcJV�9 d0 SISD'9754p'WFi N '!• .fiat i.W a •pa00s 1!•nrYd '!• rtOiR m•O•Y oilaM1a •Y wlwo: aa,nxa 'T.no . urpnaa °u1�uYa. Trrt° R't uwnao °t•woW '!• ar.a 'III• 101 Iv.YNv Ls. • of q'On ♦,i,na t,Wl• •oMll° Hn Oa•OYOW r•tY .n,'l...rertt ••aY. alr. ,.Lo, �t Lr.�iY •.n.•olap S�I1SIlf/1S �115 lnt O, Otla'w00 gtYanl 11Y Of 3eiT and l�a0%a +a,wne.m u.ro� any w •umla.s • awrpr'nLYON «Y�nplxrol'or wuoa• oic i.a*�a i oliie�i o�•.r nirroini a iaa•o•�uYon aY a nmY 'Lay opr l•an and q tay oa wrro. an q !ly o• won rn, w»xt °n. •ta.�•n Yto..n. fa+�oYo'-�aa u.•rn� ' w.Y YiaM ot°rooar aaa° La o•w Yu wn q uMm ana o1 ousvca gorinl uy op Lean ant ue�xt tan _ tW'Y'nLLrON a.,...«w1 .or wuox „ nlnl,q Y •� np llvtnlro Mi q lTn pyYp, lnl • v�Y.Y II tl Afao qq I i ra t I .. I I:,„ti IT 0 t°•. I I A ;I�K� r I A rRrp I � x IU�oei1)aNL.'a rlf QLNER APPLICANT a« Inn. `a.o"oa1pT lwncw m...tl.n: vpn ENG INEER/SURYEYCP/PLANNER .1 , II4 p WT4 .W.1"n0 YLLrN[, -T. N.M( w.e4werd a.001 U,l .e1• Vtt <cMKir D.ND GTTd. wl. • DOU+11rt yl/Ol J. vu,Dllli/NDd. �LI. • WIWt.pt ' ' ' i '. L4Ia e. NeIaLN1Ol rt,uryw LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1. ,, w Nawn N.L. n ne rartNeWT ul.wtew n nn Now'r,.uer nl.11rew n w Ncwnte.er al.wrtw a eecT�w n,orlwNl� l) NowTx wrN,lan . l.e*, uvt a � aces Toe ueT o ran TWIYb cd.e.lD rD T- co.,x n IIr,D row wao er Deno wacowoeD wDew %»u cc+r+T. wcowo ctuo Now,N �'.o � - y wiiaeur � w � .. rl[T NDrnt q Rein T.tl .q/M 1.0 d nl —T rlR n ,W NOwn N.aJ b w MNWUT ol�wrlw d w - y �J U r NMwYi1T YlYRew n 1Ne Nole,W.rT aLwrlw b ccwx m.INweTo.L � yf i Z ac... w v.rr ,o ner woven eata.eo To w caxnb %rNe row A'l.D e. DUD pcpoeD wDew .lrcwowe wre.. ,leuu. Z rNe NOR4 4w b rw .wTN 441r n ,Ne eaw.er n w «owr4e.er Ol.lJerTw O MCrld n. T•LWIWI« 1)aNOw}N, w.N+w a I.Mi x �,. w Kwtl DOWx. W..,.a�rd I e%C[R ,ue ulei )O RR rWrllb DGwve.eD ,O %w0 x rOw Kl".p Nre`Oete, ei DIIJ IACGIpID V.Delt relfobM w!!ew Il.1W. � U Z TREE LEGEND O e U� z NOTE: O � NOTtD M1rLDWa. TO D6 rbtllOHD. V4[>. OTNIRYM 2t � 1. 41L Twe1r io N lrOeMD. 2 � �? p� 15 �g2 5ASIS OF ®EARINGS w w 0 NOO'Ol'.1 V NTWDI rw rv]urTrt1 rOWD Al Toole �r d.,.nw .No w NownuT wrnd b MRId ro. lOUNM.w i) NOwrN, rt4YJn . lYi, eel. rrew %L.aI, 1 r•r�.T . r VD'' w CCrs.[w cdcr¢fn eW. 11Dt NIND wN..n. OrTplin Y � � 4 I i I ��DO% W n wlw .ewe Ww"' ole%.* anrwcnd � � � - ll:. n. , wNo .Ira.... ll..l.N Cw ftl�Its rf[repl m SCALE: 1" m 40 ° DATUM: ,: `L . 4- 0 L P. -)JECT INFORMATION (cont—aed) NUMBE-- -R OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): /7, ' L SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): j,v SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): k, NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable):(\,%'-- \ IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE IN, -)E SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO ❑ FLOOD HAZARD AREA ❑ GEOLOGIC HAZARD ❑ HABITAT CONSERVATION ❑ SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES ❑ WETLANDS I LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included) sq.f sq. f sq.f sq. f sq. fl SITUATE IN THE QUARTER OF SECTION TOWNSHIP , RANGE_, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Order No. 489068 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A Page 2 The land referred to in this Short Plat Certificate is in the State of Washington, and described as follows: PARCEL A: The north half of the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington; EXCEPT the west 30 feet thereof conveyed to the County of King for road by Deed recorded under King County Recording Number 3261892; AND EXCEPT the south 160 feet of the west 330 feet. PARCEL B: The north 80 feet of the south 160 feet of the west 330 feet of the north half of the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington; EXCEPT the west 30 feet thereof conveyed to the County of King for road by deed recorded under Recording Number 3261892. PARCEL C: The north half of the south half of the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington; EXCEPT the west 30 feet thereof conveyed to King County for road purposes, by deed recorded under Recording Number 3261892. I P► EJECT INFORMATION (cont►. ,(e NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): Z 3F Ceskcki) c-5 e i -to A-Mcu SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (d applicable): N SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): 1Z3 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): �j /a SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (f applicable): tj r I­�_ NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): N) 1 Pv NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): � I PROJECT VALUE: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): 0 AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO 0 FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. 0 GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. ❑ HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. ❑ SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq. ft. O WETLANDS sq. ft. I LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description on senaratP shPPt with the fnllnwinn infnrma*inn inrinrinrll SITUATE IN THE QUARTER OF SECTION , TOWNSHIP , RANGE_, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PARCEL D: The south 80 feet of the west 330 feet of the north half of the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington; EXCEPT the west 30 feet thereof conveyed to King County.for road purposes by Deed recorded under Recording Number 3261892. END OF SCHEDULE A CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBMITTING DATA: Dept/Div/Board.. HEARING EXAMINER Staff Contact... Fred J. Kaufman, ext. 6515 SUBJECT: Cedar Avenue Preliminary Plat File No. LUA-02-125, PP, ECF EXHIBITS: Hearing Examiner's Report and Recommendation RECOMMENDED ACTION: Council Concur AI #: I -rr FOR AGENDA OF: August 4, 2003 AGENDA STATUS: Consent......... XX Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Ordinance....... Resolution...... Old Business.... New Business.... Study Session... Other........... APPROVALS: Legal Dept...... Finance Dept.... Other........... I) FISCAL IMPACT: N/A Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.. Amount Budgeted........ Revenue Generated... SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Hearing Examiner's Report and Recommendation on Cedar Avenue Preliminary Plat was published June 3, 2003. There were no requests for reconsideration and the appeal period ended on June 17, 2003. The Examiner recommends approval of the proposed preliminary plat, subject to the conditions outlined on page 10 of the Examiner's Report and Recommendation. This office notes that the conditions placed on this project are to be met at later stages of the platting process. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Cedar Avenue Preliminary Plat, subject to conditions. June 3, 2003 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION APPLICANT: Dr. Baljinder & Rashpal Buttar 4501 NE 4'h Street, Suite A Renton, WA 98056 Cedar Avenue Preliminary Plat File No: LUA-02-125,PP,ECF LOCATION: 3521 Cedar Avenue South SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Subdivide a 9.9-acre site into 50 lots for the construction of detached single-family residences. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on May 13, 2003. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area; the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the May 20, 2003 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday, May 20, 2003, at 9:05 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original application, proof of posting, proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Preliminary Plat Plan Exbibit No. 3: Neighborhood Vicinity Map Exhibit No. 4: Zoning Map Exhibit No. 5: Coal Mining Area Map Exhibit No. 6: Sensitive Areas Map Exhibit No. 7: hazard Areas Map from Sunnybrook Cedar Avenue Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-02-125,ECF, PP June 3, 2003 Page 2 The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Leslie Nishihira, Senior Planner, Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98055. The proposal is to subdivide a 9.9- acre site into 50 lots intended for the development of detached single-family homes. The property is located in the southern portion on the City in the Talbot Hill area, abutting the division line between the City of Renton and King County. Surrounding the site are existing developments to the northeast under R-8 zoning, directly north are some undeveloped properties, zoned R-8, south are properties zoned R-10 and R-8, most recently the Sunnybrook plat was approved. There are coal mine hazardous areas that need to be avoided. The project was reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) who issued a Determination of Non - Significance Mitigated (DNS-M). The DNS-M included twenty mitigation measures. There were no appeals filed. Measure one requires the project to comply with the recommendations contained within the Coal Mine Hazard Assessment and Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Report, Measure two through five deal with temporary erosion control, measure six prohibits the placement of any structures, utilities, roadways within the designated high hazard areas, measure seven requires installation of a permanent fence surrounding the high hazard area, including signage at visible locations, measures eight and nine require informing future property owners of the coal mine hazard notice, measures ten and eleven require the applicant to comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Drainage Manual with regard to flow control and the tight line drainage system, measure twelve requires the applicant to comply with the Wetland Study Report and Mitigation Plan, measure thirteen through fifteen requires the installation of silt fencing, permanent signage and fencing and a Native Growth Protection Easement to protect the wetlands, measures sixteen, nineteen and twenty were the standard fire, traffic and parks mitigation fees, and measures seventeen and eighteen requires a minimum 20' for all access roadways and that the applicant will provide the necessary means of access to serve the development. The proposal was routed to various City sections for review, comments have been incorporated into the Staff Report. The subject site is designated Residential Options on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The RO designation is designed to create new planned neighborhoods that include single family and multi -family developments. The proposal complies with infill development and RO policy LU-53 and LU-55. With respect to the underlying zoning designation, the density after deduction of the preserved wetland area, high coal mine hazard area, rights -of -way and private street easements the total 122,219 square feet of area, the resulting net acreage is 7.11 acres which results in a density of 7.03 dwelling units per acre which is just within the minimum range required. The proposal contains 100% of detached dwelling units, which is permitted in the R-10 zone. All lots comply with the minimum width, depth and area requirements. Two tracts are proposed in the project, Tract A, on the western portion of the site is 21,055 square feet and would contain the wetland and storm drainage areas. Tract B, in the north central portion of the property is approximately 33,825 square feet and would contain the High Mine Hazard Area. All lots, with the exception of 35 and 50, meets all front, rear and side yard setback requirements. Setbacks for these two lots do need to be corrected prior to recording the plat. Discussion ensued regarding portions of land adjoining lots 43, 47 and I as to who would be responsible for their care and maintenance. They need to be included with the various lots or made a separate tract. The homeowners should be responsible, or the adjacent lots should have ownership of these parcels. Cedar Avenue Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-02-125,ECF, PP June 3, 2003 Page 3 There are existing structures on the property, including a single-family residence and detached accessory buildings. Staff recommends that these be demolished prior to recording of the plat. Side lot lines are at right angles to street lines and are configured in a manner most suited to the existing topography of the site. All lots, with the exception of 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14, 34, 35, 36, 40, 41, 42, 45, 46, 47, and 48 would have direct frontage to a newly created public roadway. The above exceptions would be serviced by private access drive easements proposed at 26 feet in width with 20 feet of paving. Staff has made additional recommendation requiring that the lots depicted on the plan meet all requirements for private roadways. Primary access to the site is proposed via an extension of a roadway that would be constructed as part of the Sunnybrook plat (proposed Road B) and would terminate at the northern property line. Extending eastward off Road B would be proposed Road A, bisecting the center portion of the site and connect to a secondary access point that is presently unimproved. This portion of Cedar Avenue is of substandard width and only includes 26 feet of roadway area with no paving. The project will be required to provide the appropriate paving width and turning radius for emergency access vehicles. The strip of land is not a dedicated right-of-way at this point. The public roads are proposed at reduced widths of 42 feet and would include 32 feet of paving along with curb, gutter, five-foot sidewalks and street lighting. The sidewalks are provided on both sides for Road A and B and are also included on the plan for the secondary access point on the northeast corner to the county roads. Staff recommends placement of permanent signage at the very northern end of Road B, indicating that at some point this road may be extended further north. Pedestrian linkage to the road that is part of the Sunnybrook project and further to Talbot road is required. The topography of the site slopes down from east to west with average slope of approximately 12% across the property. The site is located in areas designated with potential coal mine hazards based on the City's Sensitive Area's Maps. It also contains slopes between 15-25%. Site is predominately vegetated with grasses and blackberries as well as cotton wood, maple, cedar, and pine trees, most of which would be removed during site preparation. Earthwork is estimated at 5,000 cubic yards of cut and fill. At completion, 60% of the site is estimated to be covered with impervious areas. The geotechnical report concludes that the site is suitable for the development provided that they comply with recommendations contained within that report. In addition, specific erosion control measures have been required by staff during the construction of plan improvements in individual building lots. It has been learned that the Springbrook 1I Mine underlies the site and dips at a very steep angle, approximately 61 degrees down to the south. There are also three back -filled mine openings in the north -central portion of the site. The report concludes that the Springbrook II Mine is substantially collapsed and there is no manifestation of regional ground substenance on the site. There is a high hazard area in the north -central portion of the property in Tract B. There are no low or medium hazard areas identified. SEPA required applicant to install split rail fencing around the High Hazard Area within Tract B. The subject site is surrounded by predominately single-family residences, in the north there is some undeveloped property, and south there is the Sunnybrook proposal that will include all detached dwelling units. Within King County, just east of the project, are some apartments. Police, Fire, Recreation and the School District all indicated that provided that the applicant pay the required mitigation fees they could provide services to the proposed development. Cedar Avenue Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-02-125,ECF, PP June 3, 2003 Page 4 The applicant proposes to collect offsite flows near the eastern edge and reroute it to the site in a tight line drainage system underneath proposed Road A. This will exit the site approximately 22 feet from the southeastern property line into its existing drainage channel. No detention or water quality treatment is required. On site run off will be directed to a combination detention water quality pond and will discharge to the existing wetland in the southwest corner of the site. Staff requires that it comply with the 1998 Manual with SEPA conditions. Staff recommends as a condition of plat approval that the applicant be required to establish a Homeowners Association or Maintenance Agreement for common utility and roadway improvements included in the project. The wetlands map was made Exhibit 6, Sensitive Areas. There are four wetlands on the site. The wetland A was formed on top of fill legally placed on the property, the wetland hydrology is solely provided by the compaction of the soil and fill materials, and that the US Army Corp of Engineers will not take jurisdiction over the wetland. Wetland B and C are classified as category 3, both less than 5,000 square feet, and are permitted to be filled. Wetland D is a category 2 Emergent Wetland, as such it requires a minimum buffer within 50 feet. The City of Renton and The Soos Creek Water and Sewer districts serve the site. The applicant needs to contact Soos Creek Sanitary Sewer District for availability. In conclusion, staff recommends approval of the Cedar Avenue Preliminary Plat subject to conditions listed in the Staff Report. Lafe Hermansen, Core Design, 14711 NE 29'h Place, Suite 101, Bellevue, WA 98007 stated that sewer and water availability have been applied for. Soos Creek has been contacted and they are awaiting an answer. Tract B, the intention of the division was to create a green space along the road, there is a view of the valley and mountains, also with the potential of a tot lot or something that would be secluded on that side of the street. The area around the High Coal Mine Hazard area is intended to be a grassy area with some trees. The area adjacent to Lot 47, the property owners have an option to purchase this land, so the strip in question could be added into a lot in the future. It will be included in Lot 47. The long skinny piece of property that runs north/south adjacent to Lot 1, we didn't know what the City was going to want to do with it, it was never a right-of-way to the County. It was thought to create an access trail through there to be maintained by the Homeowners Association. The Examiner asked if there was a coal mine hazard in that area. Ms. Nishihira responded that a hazard area is designated in the southern corner. Rob Stevens, Core Design, 14711 NE 291h Place, Suite 101, Bellevue, WA 98007, civil engineer on the project and responsible for the storm drainage design. Regarding concerns of the wetlands being filled and how they were being compensated for in the detention facility. The wetlands were created by the coal mining activities, they are relatively created areas on sloped areas. The conditions used for the site are forested conditions, which are more conservative that actual wetlands. The detention facility has sized for the King County 1998 Manual Level 2 criteria. Neil Watts, Director Development Services, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, stated that this site can be very confusing in terms of what we visualize wetlands being. Typically they are ponds and places where ducks reside, looking closely at the location of the larger wetland, it is on a fairly steep slope. Basically you have land that is wet versus the typical swamp or pond. Using forested pre-existing conditions is more conservative method of sizing for the new pond that being treated as a wetland. Regarding the piece of property running adjacent to Lot 1, there is no evidence that that strip was ever dedicated to the County or the City, it appears that it is still a piece of this parcel. The Administration's preference is that this remains as private property. Cedar Avenue Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-02-125,ECF, PP June 3, 2003 Page 5 Oliver Grail, Talasae Consultants, LLC, 15020 Bear Creek Road NE, Woodinville, WA 98072, commented that Wetland A, by the nature of its landscape position and the shape of the land form there, has very low storm water detention capacity, the loss of that wetland would not represent substantive increase in storm water runoff from the site. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 10:05 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS &r RECOMMENDATION Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: The applicant, Dr. Baljinder and Rashpal Buttar, filed a request for approval of a 50-lot Preliminary Plat together with two tracts. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit 41. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non -Significance - Mitigated (DNS-M) for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. The subject site is at 3521 Cedar Avenue South. The subject site is located southwest of SR-515 and north of Carr Road, Talbot Road South is located east of the subject site. 6. The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 4476 enacted in October 1994 (the staff report indicated the year was 1974). The subject site is zoned both R-10 (Residential Options permitting single family and attached housing). The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of residential options including detached single family and multiple family uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 9. The subject site is approximately 9.9 acres or 432,069 square feet. The subject site is a generally rectangular parcel that is approximately 332 feet wide (north to south) by 1,318 feet long. A third -party property, not part of the proposal, is located near the northeast corner of the subject site and is surrounded by the subject site on the north, west and south. It has a long narrow panhandle at its southeast corner that is approximately 30 feet wide (east to west) by 280 feet long. The panhandle has been described as an unopened right-of-way but title and record searches did not find any dedication or assignment to the public. (see below) 10. The site slopes downward from the east to the west approximately 140 feet or approximately 12%. The property drops in three stages or locations with the eastern third dropping approximately 8% to 15%, the central portion dropping approximately 18% to 27% and the western portion dropping approximately 8 %. Cedar Avenue Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-02-125,ECF, PP June 3, 2003 Page 6 11. The site contains both wetland areas and high hazard coal mine areas. Three wetlands were determined to be unregulated and will be filled and developed. These are a small Wetland B (1,275 square feet) in the northwest corner of the site, a small Wetland C (740 square feet) in the southeast corner of the site and large Wetland A ((12,211 square feet) in the center of the site. All are Category 3 wetlands. 12. Wetland D is a Category 2 wetland located in the western portion of the site. The wetland is approximately 59,138 square feet with approximately 28,572 square feet located on the subject site. This wetland would be preserved and requires a 50-foot wide buffer. The applicant's preparation of the site for development would disturb approximately 6,700 square feet of buffer area for this wetland. It would be restored after the needed work is complete. An exemption was granted to allow this work. In addition, an exemption will allow storm water to be discharged into the wetland and to allow storm water management facilities to be installed in the buffer but not the wetlands. 13. The coal mine area is located in the north central area of the site. The area is approximately 350 feet long (east to west) by 75 feet wide. This area will be left undeveloped and an area just north of it will also be left undeveloped since access to it would be difficult. Fencing will identify the area and signs will be installed to warn of potential danger in the area. 14. The subject site is covered by grasses, blackberries and some larger Cottonwood, Maple, Cedar and Pine trees. Most of the trees and smaller vegetation will be removed to allow the dense development permitted in the R-10 zone. The vegetation in the sensitive coal mine and wetland areas will be retained. 15. An existing home and outbuildings are located near the northeast corner of the subject site. 16. The applicant proposes dividing the property into 50 lots. In addition, the applicant proposes two larger tracts near the wetland in the west to contain storm water and north of the coal mine area in the center of the property, as well as some smaller landscaped or open space parcels in areas too small to contain building lots. One is east of the coal mine area, another is a narrow strip in the furthest northeast corner of the parcel and the third is the panhandle segment in the southeast corner of the plat. There would also be wetland and coal mine areas. 17. The applicant proposes developing the fifty lots with detached single-family homes although the R-10 would allow a mix of detached and attached dwelling units. 18. Most of the homes would be located north and south of a new road that would run west to east across the middle of the plat. This new road would be the primary access. It will connect on the west with a new north -south road that would extend from a roadway being developed by the recently approved Sunnybrook plat. At its eastern end the east -west road would swing north and connect to Cedar Avenue, which would serve as a secondary access. Cedar is a narrow substandard connection. 19. Lots would be aligned north and south of the primary access road in single, double and triple stacked lots. That is there would be a series of interior or internal lots that would not front directly on a road but would be accessed by an easement roadway. These interior lots will be constrained in size and surrounded on three or four sides by other homes. These interior lots would be very hemmed in by this development pattern. 20. There will be five easement roadways providing access to 18 interior lots, Lots 3, 7-10, 13, 14, 34-36, 40-43 and 45-48. In addition, staff recommended that the lots that have road frontage on both the public Cedar Avenue Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-02-125,ECF, PP June 3, 2003 Page 7 roadway and these private easements use the easements for access in order to reduce the number of curb cuts on the public right-of-way. The lots affected by this recommendation would be lots 6, 11, 12, 33, 37, 44 and 49. 21. The westernmost, north -south road would be stubbed at the north property line of the subject site. This would eventually be extended to provide access to the property north of the subject site. Staff recommended that a sign be erected informing future residents that a through street is intended to be developed at that location. 22. The ERC required that the applicant provide both primary and secondary access roads to serve the development. This condition presupposes that if the adjacent Sunnybrook plat does not develop, that the applicant will still have to provide the necessary roads for access to the subject site. 23. The R-10 requires minimum lot sizes of 3,000 square feet for detached single-family homes. Lot width is 30 feet or 40 feet for corner lots and lot depth is 55 feet. The proposed lots vary from 3,600 square feet to 5,750 square feet. Lot width will vary from 35 feet to 55 feet and length will vary from 80 feet to 122 feet. 24. The applicant has specified the various yards for lots that front both public streets and the easement roadways. Proposed Lots 35 and 50 do not appropriately designate the appropriate front and rear yard setbacks. In addition, staff has noted that the lots are constrained by size and dimensions and that building pads for many of them should be oriented as noted in the following chart: Lot # Front Yard Rear Yard Side Yard Along Interior Side (10 feet) (15 feet) a Street (10 feet) Yard(s) (5 feet) 3 west property line east property line N/A north & south property lines 5 north property line south property line west property line east property line (exclusive of easmt) 6 east property line west property line north property line south property line (exclusive of easmt) 7 east property line west property line N/A north & south (exclusive of property lines easmt) 8 east property line west property line N/A north & south property lines 9 west property line east property line N/A north & south property lines 10 west property line east property line N/A north & south (exclusive of property lines easmt) l l west property line east property line north property line south property line (exclusive of easmt) 12 east property line west property line north property line south property line (exclusive of easmt) Cedar Avenue Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-02-125,ECF, PP June 3, 2003 Page 8 13 east property line west property line N/A north & south (exclusive of property lines easmt) 14 east property line west property line N/A north & south property lines 33 east property line west property line south property line north property line (exclusive of easmt) 34 east property line west property line N/A north & south (exclusive of property lines easmt) 35 east property line west property line N/A north & south (must be property lines corrected) 36 west property line east property line N/A north & south (exclusive of property lines easmt) 37 west property line east property line south property line north property line (exclusive of easmt) 40 east property line west property line N/A north & south (exclusive of property lines easmt) 41 east property line west property line N/A north & south property lines 42 west property line east property line N/A north & south property lines 43 west property line east property line N/A north & south (exclusive of property lines easmt) 44 east property line west property line south property line north property line (exclusive of easmt) 45 east property line west property line N/A north & south (exclusive of property lines easmt) 46 east property line west property line N/A north & south property lines 47 west property line east property line N/A north & south property lines 48 west property line east property line N/A north & south (exclusive of property lines aasmt) 49 west property line east property line south property line north property line (exclusive of easmt) 50 east property line west property line south property line north property line (must be corrected) Cedar Avenue Preliminary Plat File No.:.LUA-02-125,ECF, PP June 3, 2003 Page 9 25. The development will increase traffic approximately 10 trips per unit or approximately 500 trips for the 50 single-family homes. Approximately 50 additional peak hour trips will be generated in the morning and evening. 26. The subject site is split between the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District and the City of Renton for water service. The two districts are working on the boundary. The site is entirely within the Soos Creek District for sanitary sewer. 27. The subject site is located within the Renton School District. The project is expected to generate approximately 22 school age children. These students would be spread across the grades and would be assigned on a space available basis. 28. The density for the plat would be 7.03 dwelling units per acre after subtracting sensitive areas (coal mine and wetland) and roadways. 29. There is R-8 zoning generally north, west and south of the site along Talbot Avenue South. R-10 is found south of the subject site. 30. As noted, the applicant proposes some common open space areas that would be under the control of a homeowners association. In one case the parcel is located south of Proposed Lots 40 and 43 in the center of the site. A private easement roadway would bisect the parcel. The second such parcel is located at the extreme northeast corner of the site east of Proposed Lot 47. It is approximately 30 feet wide and 150 feet long and is sandwiched between two third -party properties. The third area is that panhandle at the southeast corner of the site as well as a triangular remnant created by the curvature of the proposed road. The City does not want ownership of this parcel and due to coal mine hazards south of it, it cannot be used for permanent access. In addition, as noted above, Tracts A and B are adjacent and associated with the Wetlands and Coal Mine areas respectively. The panhandle could be traded or offered to the Sunnybrook development. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed plat appears to satisfy the public use and interest. The proposed plat will provide a complement of small lot single family housing for those who do not want or need larger lots or homes. The disadvantage of this arrangement will be the large number of interior lots. Such lots may feel confined or hemmed in since they are surrounding by housing and possibly fences on all sides rather than an open streetscape. In addition, the easement access reduces the useful yard areas in some case but the lots do meet the various requirements of code. 2. The development of detached single-family uses on the R-10 parcel meets the policies and goals of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed plat provides for Mfill development in an area where urban services are available. The proposal also meets the required density, seven to ten units per acre, of the City. The development should not tax either the road system or the existing utility infrastructure. The applicant will have to develop a road system in the plat and may have to develop roadways outside the plat if the Sunnybrook plat does not complete the necessary access roads. Cedar Avenue Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-02-125,ECF, PP June 3, 2003 Page 10 Development of the additional lots will increase the tax base of the City. The applicant has also been required to pay mitigation fees to offset its impacts on fire, parks and transportation systems. Since a through road may be developed at the northwest corner of the plat where a stub road will be installed, staffs recommendation that a sign be posted is appropriate. Since there may be unmapped coal mine areas outside of the known hazard areas, the applicant will be required to record restrictive covenants for the entire site that mirror those required by the ERC. The common open space areas may create maintenance problems and the one adjacent to Proposed Lot 47 should be incorporated into that lot. The open space panhandle and triangle adjacent to Proposed Lot 1 needs special treatment if portions of it are conveyed to Sunnybrook. The portions adjacent to Proposed Lot l should be incorporated into that lot if the remainder is conveyed. The development of the subject site will create additional traffic. There will also be additional noise associated with larger population. "These impacts should not create any undue impacts on the overall community and were anticipated when the Zoning and Comprehensive Plan were adopted. 10. In conclusion, the proposed plat appears reasonable and should be approved by the City Council. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should approve the Preliminary Plat subject to the following conditions: A covenant that addresses the approved density of the site and the dwelling unit mix approved with the plat shall be created concurrently with the recording of the plat. A draft of the document shall be submitted to the City of Renton Development Services Division for review and approval by the City Attorney and Property Services section prior to the recording of the plat. 2. The applicant shall revise the plat plan in order to provide the correct yard setbacks for lots 35 and 50. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the recording of the plat. 3. The applicant shall obtain a demolition permit and complete all necessary inspections and approvals for the existing detached structures to be removed from the property. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the recording of the plat. 4. The applicant shall indicate on the face of the plat the location and orientation of the front, rear and side yard setbacks for each of the lots as depicted on the approved plat plan and as referenced in the table included in the staff report. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the recording of the plat. The lots which front both the public roadway and a private street (lots 5, 6, 11, 12, 33, 37, 44, and 49) shall utilize the abutting private street for driveway access and shall not be served directly off of the public roadway. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of the construction permits for the installation of roadway improvements for the development. Cedar Avenue Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-02-125,ECF, PP June 3, 2003 Page 1 1 The applicant shall install permanent signage at the north end of public roadway "B" which indicates the roadway may be extended at a future date. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the recording of the plat. 7. A homeowner's association or maintenance agreement shall be created concurrently with the recording of the plat in order to establish maintenance responsibilities for all shared improvements within this development. A draft of the document(s), if necessary, shall be submitted to the City of Renton Development Services Division for review and approval by the City Attorney and Property Services section prior to the recording of the short plat. The applicant shall comply with the conditions imposed by the ERC. The applicant shall provide a turnaround acceptable to the Fire Department. The turnaround can be abandoned or dismantled once adequate through or looped circulation is provided by development of adjacent properties. 10. Since through roads are anticipated from the new access road, signs should be posted that prominently note that the stubs or cul-de-sac will eventually create a roadway or roadways with through traffic. IL The applicant shall be required to record restrictive covenants that mirror those required by the ERC for the entire site regarding coal mine hazards. 12. The common open space areas may create maintenance problems and the one adjacent to Proposed Lot 47 should be incorporated into that lot, unless conveyed to a third -party ownership. The open space panhandle and triangle adjacent to Proposed Lot 1 needs special treatment if portions of it are conveyed to Sunnybrook. The portions adjacent to Proposed Lot 1 should be incorporated into that lot if the remainder is conveyed. 13. The applicant shall obtain the necessary "will serve" written confirmation that both domestic water and sanitary sewer services are available to serve the plat. ORDERED THIS 3rd day of June, 2003. FRED J. KA AN HEARING E 1NER TRANSMITTED THIS 3rd day of June, 2003 to the parties of record: Lesley Nishihira Lafe Hermansen Oliver Grab 1055 S Grady Way Core Design Talasae Consultants, LLA Renton, WA 98055 14711 NE 291h Place, Suite 101 15020 Bear Creek Road NE Bellevue, WA 98007 Woodinville, WA 98072 Cedar Avenue Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-02-125,ECF, PP June 3, 2003 Page 12 Neil Watts 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Rob Stevens Core Design 14711 NE 291h Place, Suite 101 Bellevue, WA 98007 TRANSMITTED THIS Yd day of June, 2003 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tamper Members, Renton Planning Commission Larry Rude, Fire Marshal Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Transportation Systems Division Utilities System Division South County Journal Dr. Baljinder & Rashpal Buttar 4501 NE 4`h Street, Suite A Renton, WA 98056 Gregg Zimmerman, Plan/Bldg/PW Admin. Neil Watts, Development Services Director Alex Pietsch, Econ. Dev. Administrator Larry Meckling, Building Official Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 100Gof the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., June 17, 2003. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. An appeal must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., June 17, 2003. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants, the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision -maker concerning the proposal. Decision -makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. G4 - 20 T23N R5E W 1/Z St. - (F 81 R-8 �\ ' RM-I RM-I S 27th St w' O (lam O CO O -IQQ' 172nd St. IISE 172nd 3rdSl St R-8 a R - 8 J�� 14 - 32 T23N R5E W 1/2 �'S Y p NI._.� 2Q�4QO H4 ZONING - - - - Renton 6(y Lilo ,:48o . Y/B/PW 7T INICAL �"� 03/n/03 '29 T2318� R5E 1/2 A N'1-0 5329 •ns - `�NINNVII �er�a.)r+1�wl 9SLUK' ,Wt Yo ]tnOa' v ILutS [S I '3 r+�lsaa�� 8VIUI X7ddHSVYY81. Y830N//7V8 YG 0 0 n vr- HLN1 ON FEB 14 20 -A � _ RECEI 70 r � 1 i m .s 0 Jig b9X96�i 3 w NON- my �10 -A3VPM - — bdllYA— , — 1,6 z 1 101 'A-,- I -V I I I � = / -- " 1 "7 zt, 10 6z, JJs 0/rMS'PA7ms ,4-0 t (3ro4,'-LW -�OJECT INFORMATION (canting NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): 1 I PROJECT VALUE: $ 5 0 0, 0 00 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): 2 000 S . F . SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): N/A NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): N/A NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): N/A IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO ❑ FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. 9- GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ❑ HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ❑ SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq. WETLANDS 28,57 2 sq. i LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY I(Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THE SW QUARTER OF SECTION29 , TOWNSHIP 23z1RANGE 5E, IN THE CITI OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. SCHEDULE A The North half of the North half of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter, Less the South 80 feet of the North 110 feet of the West 120 feet of the East 150 feet thereof and the East 30 feet of the South half of the North half of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter _ All in Section 29, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. King County, Washington. Less County roads. End of Schedule A CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Al #: f!1 Submitting Data: For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. Community Services/Human August 4, 2003 Services Agenda Status Staff Contact...... Karen Bergsvik, ext. 6652 Consent .............. X Public Hearing.. Subject: Correspondence.. 2004 Community Development Block Grant Funding Ordinance ............. Recommendations Resolution............ Old Business........ New Business....... Exhibits: 1. Issue Paper Study Sessions...... 2. 2004 Funding requests and recommendations Information......... 3. 2004 Contingency Plan Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept......... Refer to Community Services Committee; hold public Finance Dept...... hearing on September 8, 2003. Other ............... Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... $ 291,840 Revenue Generated......... $291,840 Total Project Budget $ 291,840 City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Human Services Advisory Committee has reviewed the applications for funding, met with all the agencies applying for funding, and submits the attached funding recommendations. Human Services received 9 requests for public services funding for the amount of $112,451; the estimated amount to allocate is $71,715. There were three requests for capital funding for the amount of $305,250 and approximately $375,550 to allocate. The remaining capital funds will be included in the 2005 allocation process. An additional $54,576 is earmarked for planning and administration, and it is used to fund the CDBG contract specialist position. A contingency plan was also developed should more or less funding be available. A public hearing is required for the allocation of 2004 CDBG funds. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the 2004 CDBG funds be distributed according to the Human Services Advisory Committee recommendations. Staff also recommends the contingency plan be adopted. Schedule a public hearing on September 8, 2003 regarding the 2004 CDBG allocation of funds. CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM ♦ rya DATE: July 28, 2003 TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Council President Members, Renton City Council VIA: Mayor Jesse Tanner FROM: Dennis Culp I Community Services Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Karen Bergsvik, ext. 6652 Human Services Division SUBJECT: 2004 Community Development Block Grant Funding Recommendations ISSUE: Process for the funding recommendations for the 2004 Community Development Block Grants. RECOMMENDATION: Agency Recommendation Public Services Communities in Schools of Renton $15,000 Community Health Centers of King County (Dental) $15,000 Domestic Abuse Women's Network $10,000 ElderHealth NW/Connection $ 9,715 Emergency Feeding Program $14,000 Visiting Nurse Services of the NW $ 8,000 Institute for Family Development $ 0 Jewish Family Services Multi -Ethnic Service Center $ 0 Refugee Social Development Resource Center $ 0 Capital City of Renton Housing Repair Assistance Program $205,250 King County Major Housing Repair Program $ 50,000 Multi -Service Center Employment Development Services $ 60,000 BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The City of Renton and other funders expect agencies to perform at a high level with demonstrated results. The South King County cities developed a common application, which can be used by agencies applying to any of the participating cities. This competitive process along with subsequent contract monitoring ensures agencies demonstrate accountability and efficiency before and after they receive funding. The application process reduces duplication of services and uses updated community needs assessments as the basis for funding services. Agencies must demonstrate organization capacity, structural integrity, appropriate record -keeping cost-effective approaches, documented outcome measures and proof of financial health. Funding recommendations are developed through the following multi step process. 1. The program must meet eligibility requirements for funding by: • Meeting a national objective (typically to benefit low and moderate -income persons) and be an eligible activity under Federal regulations, and • Meet one of the King County Consortium goals of ensuring decent, affordable housing; establishing and maintaining a suitable living environment; or expanding economic opportunities; and • Meet one of Renton funding priorities to provide human services to address basic and emergency needs; promote prevention and education to help individuals become self- sufficient; maintain affordable housing stock; support public facilities and improvements benefiting low and moderate income individuals; or support economic development. 2. Submit an application. The joint application and common reporting forms were developed by the South County cities to reduce the administrative burden on agencies applying to or receiving funding from more than one jurisdiction. 3. Application Workshop The South King County cities jointly sponsor a technical assistance workshop for interested agencies. Participating cities provide notification to agencies by mail, email, flyers, public notices, press releases, and city web pages. Application requirements and the applications are reviewed at the workshop, and agencies are encouraged to utilize the ongoing technics assistance offered by each city in completing the applications. 4. Available funding • Estimates: In March or April, the King County Consortium provides the cities with an estimate of funding for the following year based on current year's funding as well as anticipated consortium and program income. The amount received by the Consortium is a complicated formula based on the percentage of low/moderate income population in the Consortium. • City Share: As a Joint Agreement City, we receive the higher of two calculations —as a pass -through or a joint agreement city. The calculations are based on the low/moderate income population. • Final Amounts: Final amounts are not known until Congress passes the budget (usually no earlier than November). The Consortium requires each city adopt contingency funding recommendations so that funding may be adjusted in the event the final amounts differ from the original estimates. 5. Application Review • Advisory Committee receives copies of applications, prior funding, and performance history, following staff review of the applications. • Evaluation tool: The Committee is provided with a tool that evaluates the application on items such as whether the proposed program appears realistic, benefits Renton residents and includes outreach to Renton residents, whether costs to Renton seem appropriate and proportional to the amount requested, if funding will leverage other funding, provide reasonable and achievable outcomes, and provide culturally relevant services. • Agency Interviews: Agencies are scheduled for interviews with the Advisory Committee where they can address any questions raised in the application and answer questions from the Advisory Committee. • Funding Recommendations: 1. Communities in Schools of Renton ($15,000): Program achieves outcomes, leverages funds, and exceeds contract requirements. 2. Community Health Centers of King County ($15,000): The only dental service provider in South King County accepting uninsured adults between eighteen and sixty years of age and provide services on a sliding scale. Agency reports increased uncompensated care to Renton residents. Exceeds requirements. 3. Domestic Abuse Women's Network ($10,000): The only confidential shelter in South King County, DAWN exceeds its contract requirements and provides culturally appropriate services to Renton residents. 4. ElderHealth/Connection ($9,715): Cost effective way to provide health and social services to frail elders and individuals with chronic illnesses or disabilities and allow them to remain independent as long as appropriate. 5. Emergency Feeding Program ($14,000): Demand for food services is increasing. EFP supplements food banks when clients reach the maximum allowable number of visits or when food banks are closed. They have a number of referral and distribution sites in Renton. 6. Visiting Nurse Services of the NW ($8,000): Program at Senior Center providing heath screening, assessments, counseling, referral and education to frail elderly with a goal of early detection/treatment of disease, medication management and healthy lifestyle choices. 7. Institute for Family Development: (0) Funding recommended in contingency plan. Agency provides in -home family counseling, skill building and support services directed at families who are at the highest risk for abuse and neglect, family conflict and violence, school problems, delinquency, as well as other social and behavioral problems. 8. Jewish Family Services Multi -Ethnic Service Center (0): East side provider proposing services already available in South King County from local providers. 9. Refugee Social Development Resource Center (0): Requested funding to translate driver's training materials into Somali and provide translation services when taking driver's test. 10. City of Renton Housing Repair Assistance Program ($205,250). Compliance with lead based paint regulations and increased personnel costs justified increased program costs for 2004. Program maintains affordable housing stock. 11. King County Major Housing Repair Program ($50,000). Provides deferred payment loans to residents needing major home repairs and complements Renton's program. This program leverages additional funds averaging $50- 60,000 in other funds for Renton residents. 12. Multi Service Center Employment Development Services ($60,000). As a Community Based Development Organization (CBDO) they can use capital funds to increase economic opportunities through job training and provide other related support services such and childcare and transportation. This pilot program will assist low to moderate income Renton residents who have lost or are at risk of losing their jobs due to child care issues by providing child care scholarships and employment related support services such as budgeting and financial management. CITY OF RENTON 2004 FUNDING REQUESTS EXHIBIT TWO Previously 2003 2004 Agency Request Purpose Funded Funding Recomm. CDBG PUBLIC SERVICES 1 Communities in Schools of Renton 16,068 Supportive Network for Kids to Succeed Yes 15,637 15,000 2 Community Health Ctrs of King County 17,500 Provide Dental Care to Renton Residents Yes 15,637 15,000 3 Domestic Abuse Women's Network 12,600 Domestic Violence Shelter Yes 12,088 10,000 4 ElderHealth NW/Connection 12,000 Adult Day Care Yes 10,826 9,715 5 Emergency Feeding Program 14,434 Emergency Food Yes 14,434 14,000 6 Institute for Family Development 14,400 In home counseling for troubled youth No 0 0 7 JFS Multi -Ethnic Service Center 7,000 Case Mgmt, job training, I & R services No 0 0 s Refugees Social Development Resource Center 10,000 Driver's Training Assistance Program No 0 0 9 Visiting Nurse Services of the Northwest 8,449 Health Screening for Senior Citizens Yes 8,661 8,000 TOTAL AMOUNT REQUESTED 112,451 Estimated Amount Available $71,715 77,283 71,715 CDBG CAPITAL REQUESTS to ;u._ �IVIuItiServi �z s•.-Ww.g.R@. City of Renton Housing Repair Assistance Progra ., ,.^`3'i' :i'. +«w. ', :.:�'^*'::z' ;'*gpv n a9p,6U e�Le tern a: �` '� s,::. .. Y `1';Ef h" P I., j-; ,.:.at; rH sip R' air. Pt ram Km Couri}�` Nla o du e q/�ry/ M <.we.yJ.._zal..rzz¢:.'#;.rnw:.ad'a4%aGw..a.�n.».........,..qv.�.�+,«..:�.�E�Eri.�..E.�_a.-, 205,250 .. i, _. .-..,... h50 QOQ, _tiwm+.ave.%.,, ,. Minor Housing Repair Program jYes »,""� sd *35 E,•... E.. .. a'K � oEm to ee rner�,t,.5ervtces p. ,.y , ESE G:3 ..•`FW�L ,;,:. :>....-': ., t,; .it.� Qfr Ma or:Ho e'Re airs/deferredloans/antsYes p 1 „. u. l row, bg M . .,_ .. ....n�aa ... .. _•._._. .. Igo , >x v`•� 185,000 t'G "�'--'.. 0;..? 50,OOA< . , 205,250 , 000 50,000 TOTAL AMOUNT REQUESTED 305,250 Estimated Amount Available $375,550 315,250 CDBG PLANNING & ADMINISTRATION Estimated Amount Available $54,576 Total of estimated amount available $ 501,840 Total amount budgeted $291,840 " The City decides what capital projects to fund, but these capital projects are administered by Kin County. ud eted. The fundingdoes not come through the City, so the $110,000 is not in the total amount budgeted . 2004 Renton CDBG Contingency Plan The Human Services Advisory Committee recommends adoption of the following contingency funding plan should the amounts available for 2004 programs increase or decrease: Community Development Block Grant Public Services Should there be an increase in CDBG public services funding of less than $5,000, the Committee recommends that the increase in funding be distributed equally to the six projects receiving funding. Should the increase be greater than $5,000, the Committee recommends funding the Institute for Family Development's PACT program to a maximum of $8,000. Any funds in excess of that will be distributed proportionately to the already -funded programs except PACT, with a maximum amount not to exceed the amount requested in their application. If funds remain after the above distribution, the Committee recommends Community Health Centers of King County dental program receive the remaining funds. Should there be a decrease in the public services funding available, the Committee recommends that agency funding be decreased proportionately. Community Development Block Grant Capital Funding Should there be an increase in CDBG Capital Funding, the Committee recommends funds be carried over to the 2005 CDBG program year unless the Human Services Advisory Committee requests new applications/concept papers for funds and/or additional Council action is taken to allocate funds. Should there be a decrease in CDBG Capital Funding, the Committee recommends any decrease be applied proportionately to all funded projects. Planning and Administration Any additional funds for planning and administration activities will be allocated to Planning and Administrations to cover existing administrative costs for the Renton CDBG program. Funds not needed for administration of Renton's CDBG program will be applied toward the costs of updating Linkages, Renton's Human Services needs assessment, and analysis and dissemination of 2000 census data. Should there be a decrease in Planning and Administration funds, funding for Planning and Administration will be decreased by that amount. CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works Dept/Div/Board.. Technical Services Section Staff contact...... Karen McFarland x7209 Subject: Utility Easement Requests from King County across the Airport and Cedar River Trail Park Properties (Parcel Numbers 072305-9007 and 072305-9096) Exhibits: Issue Paper Utility Easements with Exhibits Al #: 'C"'• For Agenda of: August 4. 2003 Agenda Status Consent............ Public Hearing... Correspondence.. Ordinance......... Resolution......... Old Business...... New Business..... Study Sessions.... Information....... L11 Recommended Action: Approvals: Refer to Utilities Committee Legal Dept......... X Finance Dept...... Other ............... Parks, Airport Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted.......... Revenue Generated......... $262,830.00 Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. Summary of Action: Technical Services has received a request from King County to finalize the utility easements across the Airport and Cedar River Trail Park Properties (Parcel Numbers 072305-9007 and 072305-9096, respectively). STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Planning/Building/Public Works Department recommends that Council approve the utility easement requests from King County and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the utility easements by which Renton will formally grant utility easements in exchange for $262,830.00 from King County. H:\File Sys\PRM -Property Services Administration\Current Projects\Easements\BrynMawrSewerRelocation\ab easement2.doc\KLM\tb CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: July 25, 2003 TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: 5�mayor Jesse Tanner FROM: Gregg Zimmerman�ministrator Planning/Building/Public Works Department STAFF CONTACTS: Dave Christensen x7212 Karen McFarland x7209 SUBJECT: Utility Easement Requests from King County across the Airport and Cedar River Trail Park Properties (Parcel Numbers 072305-9007 and 072305-9096) ISSUE: Technical Services has received a request from King County to finalize the utility easements across the Airport and Cedar River Trail Park Properties (Parcel Numbers 072305-9007 and 072305-9096, respectively). RECOMMENDATION: The Planning/Building/Public Works Department recommends that Council approve the utility easement requests from King County and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the utility easements by which Renton will formally grant utility easements in exchange for $262,830.00 from King County. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: In 1998, King County's Wastewater Treatment Division began construction for the Bryn Mawr Sanitary Sewer System Improvements Project. Improvements were completed in early 2000. Portions of this project crossed the Airport (Parcel Number 072305-9007) and the Cedar River Trail Park (Parcel Number 072305-9096). HAFile Sys\PRM - Property Services Administration\Current Projects\Easements\BrynM awrSewerRel ocati on\IP_KCBrynM awrEasemnt. doc\KLM\tb July 25, 2003 Page 2 At the March 9, 1998 meeting, Council approved a temporary construction easement across the Cedar River Trail Park. At the May 11, 1998 meeting, Council approved a temporary construction easement across the Airport. These easements allowed King County's Wastewater Division to begin a project to install improvements for its Bryn Mawr Sanitary Sewer System Project, with the understanding that permanent easements would be acquired at the time that agreement on compensation had been reached. At that time, compensation for these easements was still in the process of being determined. During that time to the present, staff from the Parks, Airport and Technical Services groups have been negotiating a fair value for these easements as it was determined that King County's initial offer was too low. Staff have now reached a resolution with the County and believe that acceptable and fair compensation amounts have been achieved for the temporary and permanent easements for both the Airport and the Cedar River Trail Park. King County is prepared to offer the City a total amount of $262,830.00 for the temporary and permanent easements across the Cedar River Trail Park and the Airport. $52,530 would be distributed to the Airport and $210,300 would be distributed to the Parks Department. Currently, these funds are being held by the City of Renton and will be dispersed upon approval by Council to grant these easements and accept the compensation amount. The Airport and Parks staff have reviewed these easement requests and concur in the granting of these requests and to the final compensation presented. Thus, Technical Services staff recommends that the City accept the amount of $262,830.00 for the easements and that Council authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute these utility easements and allow these funds to be dispersed to the Parks Department and the Airport. cc: Dennis Culp Gregg Zimmerman Victoria Runkle Ryan Zulauf After recording return document to: l Wastewater Treatment Division Department of Natural Resources and Parks King County 201 S. Jackson Street, Suite 503 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Document Title: Utility Easement Grantors: The City of Renton Grantees: King County Ptn of Lot 072305 BLK 7 POR SECS 7 & I8-23-5 & POR TOBINS D C Abbreviated Legal Description Additional Legal Descriptions on Page(s): 4 — 15 of Document Assessor's Tax/Parcel Number(s): 072305-9007-052 UTILITY EASEMENT The undersigned Grantor(s), THE CITY OF RENTON, A WASHINGTON MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, their heirs, successors and assigns (hereinafter together referred to as "Grantor(s)'), for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND NO/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other valuable considerations, which has been provided by the King county Water Quality Fund, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby convey and grant to KING COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, its successors and assigns (hereinafter together referred to as "COUNTY"), a permanent easement over, across, along, in, upon, and under the following described property: SEE EXHIBIT "A", "A.1 ", "A.2" (Legal Description — Permanent & Temporary Easements) and EXHIBIT "B" (description of "as -built", City of Renton approved and permitted project drawings, dated December 2000) ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE Said easement being for the purpose of installing, constructing, re -constructing, operating, maintaining, removing, repairing, replacing and using a sewer interceptor with all connections, manholes and appurtenances thereto, together with the right of ingress to and egress from said described property for the foregoing purposes. Said easement to commence on March 17, 1998, the date of that certain temporary construction easement between the parties. The Grantor(s) hereby and the COUNTY, by accepting and recording this easement, mutually covenant and agree as follows: Exhibit "A" BRYN MAWR SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS PERMANENT EASEMENT CITY OF RENTON - MUNICIPAL AIRPORT PERMANENT EASEMENT ALL BEARINGS ARE REFERENCED TO THE GRID MERIDIAN OF THE WASHINGTON COORDINATE SYSTEM, NORTH ZONE, NAD 83(91). A STRIP OF LAND, FIFTEEN FEET (15') IN WIDTH, IN SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., INKING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, THE CENTERLINE OF SAID STRIP DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH MARGIN OF NORTH 6TH STREET WITH THE EAST LINE OF THOSE LANDS ABUTTING THE CEDAR RIVER RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF RENTON ON DISSOLUTION OF COMMERCIAL WATERWAY DISTRICT NO. 2 UNDER A DECREE OF DISSOLUTION DATED JULY 3, 1956, KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 494024, IN SAID SECTION 7; THENCE SOUTH 12' 47' 42" EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE 23.38 FEET TO A POINT DESCRIBED AS THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF PARCEL A, BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE CENTERLINE OF A TEN FOOT WIDE EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN SEATTLE IN DOCUMENT RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 5514905; THENCE ALONG SAID RECORDED EASEMENT CENTERLINE ON THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES; NORTH 890, 34' 11" WEST 45.35 FEET; THENCE NORTH 070 08' 30" WEST 250.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 010 35' 13" EAST 400.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 120 29' 24" WEST 489.72 FEET; THENCE NORTH 12' 56' 36" WEST 1314.62 FEET; THENCE, LEAVING SAID RECORDED EASEMENT CENTERLINE SOUTH 770 03' 24" WEST 0.41 FEET; THENCE NORTH 640 56' 33" WEST 5.83 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY SIDELINE OF SAID RECORDED EASEMENT; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 640 56' 33" WEST 17.97 FEET; THENCE NORTH 160 53' 58" WEST 376.07 FEET; THENCE NORTH 870 45' 17" WEST 266.23 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF THE CITY OF RENTON'S MUNICIPAL AIRPORT AND TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF HEREIN DESCRIBED CENTERLINE OF THE FIFTEEN FOOT WIDE EASEMENT; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 870 45' 17" WEST 699.66 FEET; THENCE NORTH 220 33' 40" WEST 256.26 FEET; THENCE NORTH 350 48' 35" WEST 69.43 FEET, MORE OR LESS TO THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID CITY OF RENTON'S MUNICIPAL AIRPORT AND TERMINUS OF SAID CENTERLINE OF EASEMENT. SIDELINES OF SAID STRIP SHALL EXTEND TO OR TERMINATE AT SAID EASTERLY AND NORTHERLY BOUNDARY LINES OF SAID MUNICIPAL AIRPORT. CONTAINING 15,380 SQUARE FEET OR 0.353 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. Prepared By: Duane Hartman & Associates, Inc Job No.:. 260.00 December 22, 1997 �0` oa . o. J J�h 9 L L A114 EXPIR^S 7 / 28 / 911 2 t5HYN MRVVH IMrnvrcmc�v PERMANENT & CONSTRUCTION EASEM CITY OF RENTON PARCEL EXHIBIT MAP COMMERCIAL WATERWAY BLOCK A No- .2 CITY�OF RENTON` MUNICIPAL AIRPORT I I� CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPLE IAIRPORT PARCEL I POIN "X7\ ENTS &A. CEDAR RIVER TRAIL PARK i. s s l N 40' 0' 0 40' 80' SCALE IN FEET !m DUANE HARTMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Surveyors HORIZONTAL. DATUM WASHINGTON COORDINATE Eb NORTH ZONE NAD 83(91) i 16928 WOOOINvd-LE-REDWONO ROAD. B-209 (425) 483-5355 x m .-..T .-, nC 15 BRYN MAWR SYSTEM IMFKVVtMtN 1, PERMANENT & CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS CITY OF RENTON PARCEL EXHIBIT MAP � \� \ � �� I t t tl t 1 1 j,►a.. � oil l i f t BLOCK A t 11 it �► �t It {I t � / 1 {{ l04 `�i► � � 11 It It { 1 ►1 i 1 It It I1 tt It t1 l I � ��/ t It II ►t i t tl II it 1 . i .I{ II ll I 1 tt Il II t I ��/ t tl tt II � 1 it 11 11 1 1 — { tt It 11 I tt it 11 1 { it It tt I 1 it II ll I 1 1 11 It ll 1 { tt 11 II � �-- I t� JL � JLJLJ t_ J _ I il t t J ► l a� It t I t cu I t I °'0 us Jt ►t, < L_J V CITY OF RENTON 1 MUNICIPLE AIRPORT PARCEL I N � I 4 0' 0 40' 80' SCALE IN FEET DUANE HARTMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Surveyors HORIZONTAL OATUM WASHINGTON' COORDINATE SYST NORTH ZONE NAD 83(91) m 16928 WOODiNVUE—REDWOND ROAD, B-209 (425) 483-55 . 35',-HT 13 OF ', tst m mAYYtf J To i tm t rinvrr-mr-n i o PERMANENT & CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS CITY OF RENTON PARCEL EXHIBIT MAP n� 40' 0' 0. 40' 80' SCALE IN FEET DUANE URTMA NN & ASSOCIATES, INC. r Surveyors M w HORIZONTAL DATUM WASHINGTON COORDINATE S NORTH ZONE NAD 83(91) I9WA 1MV)nnW%t1 I f-RMUOND RQkD_ R-Mg 1475) 4a3-5,.1515 BRYN MAWR SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Mr-n►u A ►1['►t'T O nA►I C% rr%t I^\1 n A C%C►1CAITC% - r 08/31/1998 16:47 206-483-4650 DHA PAGE 01 Exhibit "A.1" BRYN MAWR SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS PERMANENT EASEMENT' CH"TY OF RENTON PARCEL A STRIP OF LAND ACROSS THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE CITY OF RENTON. PERMANENT EASEMENT ALL BEARINGS ARE REFERENCED TO THE GRID MERIDIAN OF THE WASHINGTON COORDINATE SYSTEM, NORTH ZONE, NAD 83(91). A STRIP OF LAND IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON LYING EASTERLY OF RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH AND ABUITING THE NORTHERLY AND WESTERLY LIMITS OF THE CITY OF RENTON, SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK "A" AS SHOWN ON STATE OF WASHINGTON, COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC LANDS, THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL MAP OF LAKE WASHINGTON SHORELANDS, RECORDED UNDER ICING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 5927582, THENCE NORTH 330 52' 33" WEST ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK "A" A DISTANCE OF 92.62 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND DEEDED TO THE CITY OF RENTON IN DOCUMENT RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 3871482; THENCE NORTH 870 20' 01- WEST 264.17 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 970 20' 01 " WEST ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE CITY OF RENTON 74.1 l FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF HEREIN DESCRIBED STRIP OF LAND; THENCE SOUTH 350 48' 21" EAST 4.51 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 10' 52' 25" WEST 21.41 'FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE CITY OF RENTON; THENCE NORTH 270 53' 00" WEST, ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, 15.97 FEET; THENCE NORTH 10" 52' 25" EAST 4.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 350 48' 21" WEST 8.14 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE CITY OF RENTON; THENCE SOUTH 870 20' Ol" EAST, ALONG SAID THE NORTHERLY LINE, 12.77 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 194 SQUARE FEET OR 0.0045 ACRES'-. MORE OR LESS. Prepared BY: Duane Hartman & Associates, Inc. Job No.: 260.00 August 21, 1998 Revised August 31. 1998 1 09/01/1998 15:30 206-4B3-4650 DHA PAGE 02 BRYN MAWR SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS MUNICIPAL AIRPORT EXHIBIT MAP SEC.7, TWP.23N., R.5E., W.M. LAKE WASHINGTON SHOREtANOS v <`' z NORTH LINE CITY OF RENTON RECORDING THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL .MAP to TPOB Na. 3871482 REC.1 5927582 26 .17' N35'4 '21' 2. BLOCK A 8. 4' 338•28' — SW. CORNER 4.51' N87'20'01 "W y BLOCK A 4.64 N105"E S35'48'21"E .6 cs 21.41 ' S 10' 52' 25"W `0 RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 2 00, WEST LINE CITY OF RENTON & EAST LINE OF "THE LAKESHORE" CONDOMINUM 0 = PROPOSED SANITARY EXISTING SEWER LINE <� SEWER MANHOLE srxc I oat WH IMM TOTAL EASEMENT AREA 194 SD.FT. OR 0.0045 ACRES aT C W Mar OW SCJIIE ACCORDDJCLY DUANE RMTMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Surveyors HORIZONTAL DATUM 18928 WOODIMALLE-REDMOND ROAD. B-209 (425). 483-5355 WASHINGTON COORDINATE SYSTEM, WOODIWLLE, WASHINGTON 98072 FAX (425) 483-4850 NORTH ZONE NAD 83(91) Exhibit "A.2" BRYN MAWR SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT CITY OF RENTON - MUNICIPAL AIRPORT CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ALL BEARINGS ARE REFERENCED TO THE GRID MERIDIAN OF THE WASHINGTON COORDINATE SYSTEM, NORTH ZONE, NAD 83(91). A PARCEL OF LAND LYING WITHIN THE CONFINES OF THE CITY OF RENTON'S MUNICIPAL AIRPORT IN SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SAID PARCEL BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH MARGIN OF NORTH 6TH STREET WITH THE EAST LINE OF THOSE LANDS ABUTTING THE CEDAR RIVER RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF RENTON ON DISSOLUTION OF COMMERCIAL WATERWAY DISTRICT NO. 2 UNDER A DECREE OF DISSOLUTION DATED JULY 3, 1956, KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 494024, IN SAID SECTION 7, THENCE SOUTH 120 47' 42" EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE 23.38 FEET TO A POINT DESCRIBED AS THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF PARCEL A, BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE CENTERLINE OF A TEN FOOT WIDE EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN SEATTLE IN DOCUMENT RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 5514905; THENCE ALONG SAID RECORDED EASEMENT CENTERLINE ON THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES: NORTH 890 34' 11" WEST 45.35 FEET; THENCE NORTH 070 08' 30" WEST 250.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01' 35' 13" EAST 400.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 120 29' 24" WEST 489.72 FEET; THENCE NORTH 120 56' 36" WEST 1314.62 FEET; THENCE, LEAVING SAID RECORDED EASEMENT CENTERLINE SOUTH 770 03' 24" WEST 0.41 FEET; THENCE NORTH 640 56' 33" WEST 5.83 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY SIDELINE OF SAID RECORDED EASEMENT; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 640 56' 33" WEST 17.97 FEET; THENCE NORTH 160 53' 58" WEST 376.07 FEET; THENCE NORTH 870 45' 17" WEST 266.23 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF THE CITY OF RENTON'S MUNICIPAL AIRPORT AND TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF HEREIN DESCRIBED CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT, (LOCATION OF SAID POINT WITH RESPECT TO AIRPORT DATUM IS RIGHT 207 FEET, MORE OR LESS, OF RUNWAY CENTERLINE STATION 50+56, MORE OR LESS); THENCE SOUTH 12° 47' 42" EAST ALONG SAID BOUNDARY LINE 15.53 FEET; THENCE NORTH 870 45' 17" WEST 93.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 02' 14' 43" EAST 7.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87' 45' 17" WEST 486.24 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 16' 20' 42" WEST 16.31 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 850 01' 24" WEST 151.42 FEET; THENCE NORTH 260 48' 56" WEST 96.14 FEET; THENCE NORTH 410 17' 27" EAST 18.28 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01' 07' 40" EAST 60.00 FEET; T) rl A G --inn R U:7nninn WrMinville. WA CITY OF RENTON - MUNICIPAL AIRPORT CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT Page 2 THENCE NORTH 270 53' 00" WEST 198.32 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID CITY OF RENTON'S MUNICIPAL AIRPORT; THENCE SOUTH 8r 20' 01" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 35.13 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 350 48' 35" EAST 59.25 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 220 33' 40" EAST 237.40 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87' 45' 17" EAST 127.01 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 16' 20' 42" WEST 18.04 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 870 45' 17" EAST 482.47 FEET; THENCE NORTH 020 14' 43" EAST 7.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 870 45' 17" EAST 85.58 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID EASTERLY AIRPORT BOUNDARY LINE; THENCE SOUTH 120 47' 42" EAST ALONG SAID BOUNDARY LINE 15.53 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 31,394 SQUARE FEET OR 0.721 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. Prepared By: Duane Hartman & Associates, Inc. Job No.: 260.00 December 22, 1997 Revised March 11, 1998 7/28/98 Exhibit "B" "As -built" drawings (January 1998), Bryn Mawr System Improvements, Schedule A, Contract No. C73130C, Conformed Document dated December 2000 and City of Renton approved and permitted drawings, incorporated herein by reference and on file at the City of Renton. After recording return document to: Wastewater Treatment Division Department of Natural Resources and Parks King County 201 S. Jackson Street, Suite 503 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Document Title: Utility Easement Grantors: The City of Renton Grantees: King County A tract of land situated in Section 7, Township 23 North, Range 5 East W M in King County Washington, Abbreviated Legal Description Additional Legal Descriptions on Page(s): 4 — 23 of Document Assessor's Tax/Parcel Number(s): 072305- 9096-07 UTILITY EASEMENT The undersigned Grantor(s), THE CITY OF RENTON, A WASHINGTON MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, their heirs, successors and assigns (hereinafter together referred to as "Grantor(s)'), for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND /100 Dollars ($10.00) and other valuable considerations, which has been provided by the King County Water Quality Fund, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby convey and grant to KING COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, its successors and assigns (hereinafter together referred to as "COUNTY"), a permanent easement over, across, along, in, upon, and under the following described property: SEE EXHIBITS "A", ."A. I", "A.2", "A.3", "A.4", "A.5" (Legal Descriptions - Permanent & Temporary Easements) and EXHIBIT `B" (description of "as -built", City of Renton approved and permitted project drawings, dated December 2000) ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE Said easement being for the purpose of installing, constructing, re -constructing, operating, maintaining, removing, repairing, replacing and using a sewer interceptor with all connections, manholes and appurtenances thereto, together with the right of ingress to and egress from said described property for the foregoing purposes. Said easement to commence on March 17, 1998, the date of that certain temporary construction easement between the Parties. The Grantor(s) hereby and the COUNTY, by accepting and recording this easement, mutually covenant and agree as follows: 1. COUNTY shall, upon completion of any construction of any facilities described herein, remove all debris and restore the surface of the above described property as nearly as possible to the condition in which it existed at the date of this agreement. 2. COUNTY shall, if the above described property is disturbed by the maintenance, re- constructing, operating, removal, repair or replacement of the facilities specified herein, restore the surface of the above described property as nearly as possible to the condition in which it existed at the commencement of said maintenance, removal, repair or replacement. 3. COUNTY shall protect and save harmless Grantor(s) from any and all claims, demands, loss, damage, expense and liability of every kind and description including personal injury and for any damage to or loss or destruction of property whatsoever suffered by Grantor(s), their heirs successors and assigns, or by any persons, firms or corporations, because of the construction and/or maintenance of said facilities. 4. All right, title, and interest that may be used and enjoyed without interfering with the easement rights herein conveyed are reserved to the Grantor(s). Except as otherwise provided herein the construction, installation or maintenance of any structures, whether temporary or permanent, shall be absolutely prohibited within the above described permanent easement area and shall be deemed an unreasonable interference with the COUNTY'S easement rights unless specifically approved in writing by the COUNTY which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Moreover, as to such unapproved structure s the provisions of Paragraph 1, 2, 3, and 4 shall not apply. 5. Payment for the permanent and temporary easements shall be in accordance with that certain letter of agreement dated May 15, 2003, by and between the Parties. DATED this day of 12003. City of Renton Kin Dated: Dated: STATE OF WASHINGTON } } ss COUNTY OF } I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that--�-'kea/� Tlzjqr—>- signed this instrument, on oath stated that (#ie/she/tom) (was/vAewe) authorized to fxecute the nstrument and acknowledged it as the of eiCRZe� be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned m he instrument. O Dated - Ono 4Jl.f�-k t Pr ed Me& } (sea] or stamp ig a ur otary Public Title: /Gr- My appointment expires:S&I �yc� STATE OF WASHINGTON } } ss COUNTY OF I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument, on oath stated that (he/she/they) (was/were) authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. (seal or stamp) Dated Printed name Signature of Notary Public Title: My appointment expires: Exhibit "A" BRYN MAWR SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS PERMANENT EASEMENT CITY OF RENTON - CEDAR RIVER TRAIL PARK PERMANENT EASEMENT ALL BEARINGS ARE REFERENCED TO THE GRID MERIDIAN OF THE WASHINGTON COORDINATE SYSTEM, NORTH ZONE, NAD 83(91). A STRIP OF LAND, FIFTEEN FEET (15') IN WIDTH, IN SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, THE CENTERLINE OF SAID STRIP DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH MARGIN OF NORTH 6TH STREET WITH THE EAST LINE OF THOSE LANDS ABUTTING THE CEDAR RIVER RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF RENTON ON DISSOLUTION OF COMMERCIAL WATERWAY DISTRICT NO. 2 UNDER A DECREE OF DISSOLUTION DATED JULY 3, 1956, KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 494024, IN SAID SECTION 7; THENCE SOUTH 12' 47' 42" EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE 23.38 FEET TO A POINT DESCRIBED AS THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF PARCEL A, BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE CENTERLINE OF A TEN FOOT WIDE EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN SEATTLE IN DOCUMENT RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 5514905; THENCE ALONG SAID RECORDED EASEMENT CENTERLINE ON THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES; NORTH 89' 34' 11" WEST 45.35 FEET; THENCE NORTH 070 08' 30" WEST 250.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01° 35' 13" EAST 400.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 120 29' 24" WEST 489.72 FEET; THENCE NORTH 12' 56' 36" WEST 1314.62 FEET; THENCE, LEAVING SAID RECORDED EASEMENT CENTERLINE SOUTH 770 03' 24" WEST 0.41 FEET; THENCE NORTH 64' 56' 33" WEST 5.83 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY SIDELINE OF SAID RECORDED EASEMENT AND TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF HEREIN DESCRIBED CENTERLINE OF THE FIFTEEN FOOT WIDE EASEMENT; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 641 56' 33" WEST 17.97 FEET; THENCE NORTH 160 53' 58" WEST 376.07 FEET TO A POINT HEREIN DESIGNATED AS POINT Z; THENCE NORTH 870 45' 17" WEST 266.23 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF THE CITY OF RENTON'S MUNICIPAL AIRPORT AND TERMINUS OF SAID CENTERLINE OF SAID FIFTEEN FOOT STRIP OF LAND. ■ HLl Wmriinville: -WA CITY OF RENTON - CEDAR RIVER TRAIL PARK PERMANENT EASEMENT Page 2 SIDELINES OF SAID STRIP SHALL EXTEND TO OR TERMINATE AT THE WESTERLY SIDELINE OF SAID EASEMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 5514905 AND IN LIKE MANNER AT SAID EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF THE CITY OF RENTON'S MUNICIPAL AIRPORT. TOGETHER WITH A SMALL PARCEL OF LAND ABUTTING SAID FIFTEEN FOOT EASEMENT AND LYING NORTHERLY AND EASTERLY RESPECTIVELY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINES: BEGINNING AT POINT Z AS DESCRIBED HEREIN, THENCE SOUTH 160 53' 58" EAST ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID FIFTEEN FOOT STRIP EASEMENT 22.78 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 730 06' 02" WEST 7.50 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LINES; THENCE NORTH 87° 45' 17" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE 12.12 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LINES; THENCE NORTH 02' 14' 43" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE 16.48 FEET TO ITS TERMINUS ON THE SOUTHERLY SIDELINE OF SAID FIFTEEN FOOT EASEMENT. THE TOTAL LAND AREA, COMPRISED OF THE PRECEDING FIFTEEN FOOT WIDE STRIP AND ABUTTING SMALL PARCEL IS 10,057 SQUARE FEET OR 0.231 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. Prepared BY: Duane Hartman & Associates, Inc. Job No.: 260.00 December 22, 1997 o: .0 •p�, toss7 ��. Ja rS 7/28/9a =S T%TJA n..- .... Exhibit "A.1" BRYN MAWR SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS PERMANENT EASEMENT CITY OF RENTON PARCEL M 1 WESTERLY END OF NORTH 6TH STREET. PERMANENT EASEMENT ALL BEARINGS ARE REFERENCED TO THE GRID MERIDIAN OF THE WASHINGTON COORDINATE SYSTEM, NORTH ZONE, NAD 83(91). A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, WHICH IS CONTIGUOUS . WITH A PORTION OF THE SIDELINES OF A TEN FOOT WIDE EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN SEATTLE IN DOCUMENT RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 5514905, SAID PARCEL BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF PARCEL A AS DESCRIBED IN ABOVE RECORDED DOCUMENT, THENCE CONTINUINIG SOUTH 120 47' 42" EAST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROJECTION OF THE WESTERN BOUNDARY OF SAID PLANT NO. 20 AS DESCRIBED, 5.14 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY SIDELINE OF SAID TEN FOOT RECORDED EASEMENT AND TRUE POINT OF SAID EASEMENT DESCRIBED HEREIN; THENCE NORTH 890 34' 11" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY SIDELINE 50.91 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID SIDELINE; THENCE NORTH 07' 08' 30" WEST ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF. SAID RECORDED EASEMENT 4.46 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID WESTERLY SIDELINE NORTH 890 05' 14" WEST 5.31 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 000 54' 46" WEST 15.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 890 05' 14" EAST 59.52 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY PROJECTION OF THE WESTERN BOUNDARY OF SAID PLANT 20 DESCRIBED HEREIN; THENCE NORTH 120 47' 42" WEST ALONG SAID PROJECTION 11.33 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF HEREIN DESCRIBED EASEMENT. CONTAINING 652 SQUARE FEET OR 0.015 A Prepared By: Duane Hartman & Associates, Inc_ Job No.: 260.00 November 13, 1997 DHA Surveying & Mapping Woodinville. WA Exhibit "A.2" BRYN MAWR SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS PERMANENT EASEMENT CITY OF RENTON PARCEL M2 APPROXIMATELY 260 FEET NORTHERLY OF NORTH 6TH STREET. PERMANENT EASEMENT ALL BEARINGS ARE REFERENCED TO THE GRID MERIDIAN OF THE WASHINGTON COORDINATE SYSTEM, NORTH ZONE, NAD 83(91). A NARROW TRIANGULAR PARCEL OF LAND IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON ABUTTING A PORTION OF THE EASTERLY SIDELINE OF THAT EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN SEATTLE IN DOCUMENT RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 5514905 AND LYING WESTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT MANHOLE RO1-61 AS DESCRIBED IN SAID RECORDED EASEMENT; THENCE SOUTH 070.08' .30" EAST ALONG SAID EASEMENT CENTERLINE 13.91 FEET; THENCE NORTH 82° 51' 30" EAST 5.00 FEET TO THE EASTERLY SIDELINE OF SAID RECORDED EASEMENT AND TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID LINE DESCRIPTION; THENCE NORTH 010 08' 17" EAST 261.95 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID EASTERLY SIDELINE OF SAID RECORDED EASEMENT AND TERMINUS OF SAID LINE DESCRIPTION. CONTAINING 255 SQUARE FEET OR 0.006 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. Prepared By: Duane Hartman & Associates, Inc. Job No.: 260.00 November 13, 1997 Exhibit"A.3" BRYN MAWR SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS PERMANENT EASEMENT CITY OF RENTON PARCEL M3 ABUTTING RESTROOMS BUILDING IN PARK. PERMANENT EASEMENT ALL BEARINGS ARE REFERENCED TO THE GRID MERIDIAN OF THE WASHINGTON COORDINATE SYSTEM, NORTH ZONE, NAD 83(91). A STRIP OF LAND, FIFTEEN FEET (15') IN WIDTH, SITUATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 23.NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, THE EASTERLY LINE OF WHICH IS CONTIGUOUS WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF A TEN FOOT WIDE EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN SEATTLE IN DOCUMENT RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 5514905, THE CENTERLINE OF SAID FIFTEEN FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT MANHOLE ROI-63 AS DESCRIBED IN ABOVE RECORDED DOCUMENT, THENCE NORTH 120 56' 36" WEST ALONG SAID RECORDED EASEMENT CENTERLINE 86.52 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 770 03' 24" WEST 5.00 FEET TO THE SIDELINE OF SAID RECORDED EASEMENT AND TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE CENTERLINE OF HEREIN DESCRIBED EASEMENT, THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 7r 03' 24" WEST 34.28 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EASTERLY FACE OF AN EXISTING RESTROOMS BUILDING AND TERMINUS OF SAID CENTERLINE. SIDELINES OF SAID EASEMENT SHALL TERMINATE AT OR EXTEND TO SAID FACE OF THE RESTROOMS BUILDING. DBPreCONTAINING 514 SQUARE FEET OR 0.012 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.[(EXPIRES pared By:o Duane Hartman & Associates, Inc.tGS�-Job No.: 260.00 %CISTNovember 13, 1997 NAL LAN7/28/ 9$ Exhibit "A.4" BRYN MAWR SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS PERMANENT EASEMENT CITY OF RENTON PARCEL M4 APPROXIMATELY 800' NORTHERLY OF PARK RESTROOMS BUILDING AT ENGINEER STATION 34+34 (OCTOBER 1997 PLAN/PROFILE DWG.) PERMANENT EASEMENT ALL BEARINGS ARE REFERENCED TO THE GRID MERIDIAN OF THE WASHINGTON COORDINATE SYSTEM, NORTH ZONE, NAD 83(91). A STRIP OF LAND, FIFTEEN FEET (15') IN WIDTH, SITUATED IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, ABUTTING AND LYING ON BOTH SIDES OF A TEN FOOT WIDE EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN SEATTLE IN DOCUMENT RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 5514905, THE CENTERLINE OF SAID FIFTEEN FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT MANHOLE RO1-63 AS DESCRIBED IN ABOVE RECORDED DOCUMENT, THENCE NORTH 120 56' 36" WEST ALONG SAID RECORDED EASEMENT CENTERLINE 882.55 FEET TO HEREIN DESCRIBED POINT "A"; THENCE SOUTH 770 03' 24" WEST 5.00 FEET TO THE WESTERLY SIDELINE OF SAID RECORDED EASEMENT AND TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE CENTERLINE OF HEREIN DESCRIBED WESTERLY EASEMENT PORTION; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 770 03' 24" WEST 43.00 FEET TO THE TERMINUS OF SAID CENTERLINE. THE EASTERLY EASEMENT PORTION BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT POINT "A" AS HEREIN DESCRIBED, THENCE NORTH 770 03' 24" EAST 5.00 FEET TO THE EASTERLY SIDELINE OF SAID RECORDED EASEMENT AND TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE CENTERLINE OF HEREIN DESCRIBED EASTERLY EASEMENT PORTION; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 770 03' 24" EAST 5.00 FEET TO THE TERMINUS OF SAID CENTERLINE. CONTAINING 720 SQUARE FEET OR 0.017 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. Prepared By: Duane Hartman & Associates, Inc. Job No.: 260.00 November 13, 1997 Revised: December 18, 1997 DHA Surveying & Mapping Woodinville, WA Exhibit "A.5" ALL BEARINGS ARE REFERENCED TO THE GRID MERIDIAN OF THE WASHINGTON COORDINATE SYSTEM, NORTH ZONE, NAD 83(91). A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH MARGIN OF NORTH 6TH STREET WITH THE EAST LINE OF THOSE LANDS ABUTTING THE CEDAR RIVER, RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF RENTON ON DISSOLUTION OF COMMERCIAL WATERWAY DISTRICT NO. 2 UNDER A DECREE OF DISSOLUTION DATED JULY 3, 1956, KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 494024, IN SAID SECTION 7, THENCE SOUTH 120 47' 42" EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE 522.89 FEET; THENCE NORTH 890 25' 47" WEST, 50.70 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 00' 34' 13" WEST, 6.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89° 25' 47" WEST, 23.65 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00' 34' 13" EAST, 26.26 FEET; THENCE NORTH 05129' 13" EAST, 62.81 FEET; THENCE NORTH 170 12' 31" WEST, 147.21 FEET; THENCE NORTH 16' 28' 36" WEST, 54.86 FEET; THENCE NORTH 110 10' 06" WEST, 54.28 FEET; THENCE NORTH W 27' 04" WEST, 87.51 FEET; THENCE NORTH UP 32' 56" EAST, 6.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 09' 27' 04" WEST, 44.84 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89' 05' 13" WEST 3.59 FEET; THENCE NORTH 410 52' 51" WEST 13.96 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00° 54' 46" EAST 7.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 16' 32' 39" WEST 10.13 FEET; THENCE NORTH 041 31' 45" WEST 64.93 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WHERE THE CENTER BEARS NORTH 780 47' 21" EAST A RADIUS OF 1,095.23 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 090 08' 53", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 174.87 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00' 43' 57" EAST, 394.19 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH A CURVE TO THE LEFT WHERE THE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 870 1 V 39" WEST, A RADIUS OF 521.95 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09° 46' 55", AN ARC LENGTH OF 89.11 FEET; THENCE NORTH 120 3F 26" WEST, 131.69 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH A CURVE TO THE LEFT WHERE THE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 780 24' 35" WEST, A RADIUS OF 10.12 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 700 58' 39", AN ARC LENGTH OF 12.54 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 760 5P 35" WEST, 11.79 FEET; THENCE NORTH 12' 54' 19" WEST, 766.36 FEET; THENCE NORTH 710 30' 47" EAST, 9.45 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH A CURVE TO THE LEFT WHERE THE CENTER BEARS NORTH 200 58' 36" WEST, A RADIUS OF 11.45 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 620 34' 02", AN ARC LENGTH OF 12.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 120 40' 48" WEST, 299.18 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH A CURVE TO THE LEFT WHERE THE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 840 14' 26" WEST, A RADIUS OF 8.63 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 870 00' 33", AN ARC LENGTH OF 13.11 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 78° 24' 16" WEST, 11.15 FEET; THENCE NORTH 120 53' 56" WEST, 188.68 FEET; THENCE NORTH 77" 42' 31" EAST, 7.33 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH A CURVE TO THE LEFT WHERE THE CENTER BEARS NORTH 060 26' 41 " WEST, A RADIUS OF 10.16 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 870 04' 48", AN ARC LENGTH OF 15.44 FEET; THENCE NORTH 120 30' 54" WEST, 233.88 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH A CURVE TO THE LEFT WHERE THE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 730 17' 18" WEST A RADIUS OF 17.18 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 350 17' 57" AN ARC LENGTH OF 10.58 FEET; THENCE NORTH 790 26' 33" WEST, 74.66 FEET; THENCE NORTH 10' 47' 41 " EAST, 55.91 FEET; THENCE NORTH 550 13' 43" WEST 39.48 FEET; THENCE NORTH 110 01' 24" EAST 12.55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 04' 59' 24" EAST 34.49 FEET; THENCE NORTH 12' 4 F 35" WEST 137.81 FEET; THENCE NORTH 290 49' 05" WEST 40.03 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 770 22' 26" WEST 64.79 FEET; THENCE NORTH 110 34' 56" WEST, 129.45 FEET; THENCE NORTH 870 45' 17" WEST, 167.84 FEET; THENCE NORTH 12' 47' 42" WEST, 31.06 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 8r 45' 17" EAST, 168.52 FEET; THENCE NORTH 110 34' 56" WEST, 96.28 FEET; THENCE NORTH 29' 06' 50" EAST, 23.29 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WHERE THE CENTER BEARS NORTH 850 02' 40" EAST, A RADIUS OF 67.87 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 870 35' 23', AN ARC LENGTH OF 103.76 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH A CURVE TO THE LEFT WHERE THE CENTER BEARS NORTH 150 54' 38 WEST, A RADIUS OF 20.40 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 69° 40' 20', AN ARC LENGTH OF 24.81 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF BLOCK B, ACCORDING TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC LANDS THIRD SUPPLEMENT MAP OF LAKE WASHINGTON SHORE LANDS AS FILED ON SEPTEMBER 14, 1965 IN THE OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC LANDS AT OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON; THENCE SOUTH 88' 52' 33" EAST ALONG SAID LINE 57.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF AND THE INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID WATERWAY LANDS; THENCE SOUTH 120 47' 42" EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE 2,394.31 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 000 22' 54" WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE 454.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 12° 47' 42" EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE 193.81 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN SEATTLE IN DOCUMENT RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 5514905 LYING WITHIN AND ALSO EXCEPT THOSE PORTIONS OF THE PERMANENT EASEMENT AS DESCRIBED HEREIN THAT ARE ALSO LYING WITHIN. CONTAINING 208,696 SQUARE FEET OR 4.791 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. n ,. To include the road shown on Pages 9 and 10 of the attached Exhibit maps. Exhibit "B" "As -built" drawings (January 1998), Bryn Mawr System Improvements, Schedule A, Contract No. C73130C, Conformed Document dated December 2000 and City of Renton approved and permitted drawings, incorporated herein by reference and on file at the City of Renton. CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Al #: Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. Transportation Systems August 4, 2003 Agenda Status Staff Contact...... Bob Cavanaugh, x7222 Consent .............. Public Hearing.. Subject: Transit Signal Priority Project Correspondence.. Procurement of the Video, Network, and Communications Ordinance ............. System Resolution............ Old Business........ New Business....... Exhibits: NetVersant Proposals for a System Hardware and System Study Sessions...... Installation Services Contract Information......... Recommended Action: Refer to Transportation Committee Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required Amount Budgeted..... Total Project $220,150.06 (plus tax, bonds, and permits) $220,150.06 (plus tax, bonds, and permits) $1,219,104.00 SUMMARY OF ACTION: Approvals: Legal Dept......... Finance Dept...... Other ............... Transfer/Amendment.. . Revenue Generated... $140,150 City Share Total Project $ 80,000.06 Stage 2 of the Transit Signal Priority Project - procurement of a video, network, and communications system includes traffic video surveillance at the intersection of Sunset Blvd. North and North 3`d Street, a video and network system within the new Traffic Management Center, and a communication connection to the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Traffic Management Center. On the advice of WSDOT staff, we chose to procure this system through a State of Washington Department of Information Services (DIS) contract. We negotiated with three State DIS contractors for procurement and selected NetVersant as the supplier. There will be two purchase orders in this procurement: one for the system installation and one for the electronic equipment. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Transportation Division staff recommends Council to authorize the system hardware (electronic equipment) and the system installation, for the Traffic Management Center, under State Department of Information Systems contract in the amount of $220,150.06 plus tax, bonds and permits. HATRANS\ADMIN\AGENDA 2003\video and com agenda bill.doc CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: August 4, 2003 TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: Mayor Jesse Tanner FROM: Gregg ZiEf rrr 6,`A4`t'mmistrator STAFF CONTACT: Bob Cavanaugh, x7222 SUBJECT: Transit Signal Priority Project - Procurement of the Video, Network and Communications System T NI TF Receive authorization to purchase the electronic equipment and the system installation for the Traffic Management Center. RECOMMENDATION: Transportation Division staff recommends Council to authorize the system hardware (electronic• equipment) and the system installation, for the Traffic Management Center, under State Department of Information Systems contract in the amount of $220,150.06 plus tax, bonds and permits. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: The Transit Signal Priority project has been divided into four stages to facilitate project realization and grant reimbursement. Stage 1 - Advanced Traffic Management System (ATMS): Stage 1 will procure a new central ATMS and traffic controllers. Transit Signal Priority Project Issue Paper August 4, 2003 Page 2 Stage 2 - Video, Network, and Communications: Stage 2 is the subject of this Issue Paper and includes traffic video surveillance at the intersection of Sunset Blvd. North and North 3rd Street, a video and network system within the new Traffic Management Center, and a communication connection to the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Traffic Management Center. On the advice of WSDOT staff, we chose to procure this system through a State of Washington Department of Information Services (DIS) contract. We negotiated with three State DIS contractors for procurement and selected NetVersant as the supplier. There will be two purchase orders in this procurement: one for the system installation and one for the electronic equipment. Stage 3 - Traffic Management Center (TMC): Stage 3 will construct the architectural improvements in City Hall for a new TMC. The TMC is under construction now. Stage 4 - Transit Signal Priority: Stage 4 is largely King County's responsibility. King County will not start construction until we are done with Stages 1, 2, and 3 and also have an Operations and Maintenance Agreement in place (which we have not started yet). The King County schedule indicates about a year of activity including construction, test, acceptance, and operational adjustments. When King County is done, we will close the project out. CONCLUSION: In order to complete the Transit Signal Priority Project we must procure the video, network and communications system. Fl\TRANS\0PS\TRO-1ITIP Projects\Transit Signal Priority\docsWideo and wrn issue paper.doc tVersant network solutions for an e-world 38491" Ave. S. Seattle, WA. 98104 Ph: 206.340.1955 Fax: 206.340.1980 July 03, 2003 Robert Cavanaugh Renton City Hall 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7222 Fax: 425-430-7376 E-mail: bcavanaugh(aci.renton.wa.us Dear Mr. Cavanaugh: Thank you for allowing NetVersant Washington the opportunity to provide pricing for the Fiber Optic cabling & Communications installation on South Grady way. The pricing for this quote will be subject to change based on customer changes/requirements. If no changes are made the pricing can be used as a final quote. The proposed work will be performed per the terms and conditions of the Washington State Department of Information Services Master Agreement Number T98-MST-015. A purchase order referencing the Master Agreement Number, DIS fee (there will be a one half of one percent, .005 DIS Administration fee added to your invoice for the use of the Master Agreement) and your DIS Interlocal Number is required prior to project commencement. If you do not have an Interlocal Number, please contact Debbie Dunn at DIS (360) 902-3551. Scope of Work: 1. Provide and install (1) 12-strand single mode fiber from Renton City hall to WDOT splice location located on southbound 405. (IBI — Includes fiber splicing of 2 strands) 2. Install existing (2) 25 pair cables from street vault to City Hall MDF. (IBI -Includes termination of cables in MDF) 3. Provide and install 72-strand single mode fiber from ground floor basement to 5th floor TMC communications room. ( IBI - Includes termination in TMC) 4. Provide and install (1) 6-strand single mode fiber from 3rd and Meadows to 3rd and Sunset CCTV camera. (IBI - This should be a 12 strand fiber cable, includes fiber splice of 12 strands) 5. Provide and install installation supports and consumables per specifications for TMC build out. (IBI — Is this the cabling and equipment through City Hall and the TMC?) Page I NETVERSANT WASHINGTON Confidential and Proprietary, (as referenced in Terms and Conditions) Voice and Data Cabling - Fiber Optics - RCDD Engineering and Design - CAD Drafting - Norstar I'hone Systems NetVersant Washington 6. Provide and install new 4x4 vault and conduit pathway into City Hall. Extending (2) 4" EMT conduits to existing cable tray. (IBI — Install 2 new 3" Sch.80 PVC conduit from 4x4 on Benson into City Hall, to existing 2-3" conduits in cable tray) T98-MST-015 7. Provide and install (2) 3" GIP schedule 80 conduits from existing vault on Benson rd., Open trench across Benson at 50 ft + -, Grind and overlay to City of Renton requirements, From South end new 4x4 vault provide (2) 3" PVC schedule. 80 conduits to new 4x4 vault, at approx.250 ft + -, then trench to WSDOT existing pull box at approx.100 ft. + - . 8. Provide and install new bottomless vault at 3`d and Factory & 3`d and Meadows. 9. Extend (2) 3" conduits under sidewalk, replacing sidewalk panels afterward. 10. Scope includes electrical & CCTV work to be done on street light pole @ 3`d and Sunset. (IBI — Includes bringing power from NE corner of intersection to SW corner see CT-01) NetVersant Washington Pricing Pricing: OSP Conduit Construction, Per Technical Specifications Subcontractor — Option 1 Pricing based on original Scope of work Total: $ 69,850.00 Sub Contractor — Option 2 Pricing based on alternate conduit pathway on opposite side (east) of Benson road also Installing 4x4x4 communication vaults. Total: $ 59,950.00 Pricing: Copper & Fiber Installation Per original scope of work (includes traffic control) Total: $ 54,275.00 Pricing: Electrical support for CCTV/Fiber transmission equipment. Total: $ 6,300.00 Pricing: Communications Installation for CCTV/Fiber transmission equipment Miscellaneous Consumables and Labor; $ 43,479.00 Total: $ 43,479.00 Page 2 NETVERSANT WASHINGTON Confidential and Proprietary, (as referenced in Terms and Conditions)file:Netversant SOW - IBI co Voice and Data Cabling - Fiber Optics - RCDD Engineering and Design - CAD Drafting - Norstar Phone Systems NetVersant Washington T98-MST-015 NetVersant Washington Project Total: $ 173,904.00 (option 1) $ 164,004.00 (option 2) Communications Installation / CCTV/Fiber Transmission Equipment - City of Renton Materials, See attached Excel Spread sheet for Pricing CITY WSDOT - SR 167 Hub Optelecom 21 Card Chassis 1 Optelecom Power Supply 1 Optelecom 1 Slot Blank 2 Optelecom 3 Slot Blank 4 Optelecom 8 Channel Digital Video Mux/Transmit 1 Optelecom 8 Channel Digital Video Mux/Transmit 1 Kalatel Video Distribution Amplifier (KTS-250-16) 1 Return TMC Fiber Equipment Optelecom 21 Card Chassis 1 Optelecom Power Supply 1 Optelecom 1 Slot Blank 3 Optelecom 3 Slot Blank 3 Optelecom 8 Channel Digital Video Mux/Transmit 1 Optelecom 8 Channel Digital Video Mux/Transmit 1 Optelecom Single Channel FM Video w/Data & Voice 1 Optelecom Single Channel FM Video w/Data & Voice 1 CCTV 3rd & Sunset Optelecom Single Channel FM Video w/Data & Voice 1 Optelecom Power Supply 1 WSDOT Shoreline Optelecom Single Channel FM Video w/Data & Voice 1 Optelecom Power Supply 1 Renton TMC-Video & Network Equip. Sony 19" Hi Res Video Monitor 4 NEC 50" Plasma Display 1 NEC Plasma Display Speakers (Pair) 1 NEC Plasma Display Mounting Kit 1 Focus Enhancements Scan Converter 3 Panasonic Time Lapse VCR (AG2580) 1 Black Box 3 x 1 Data Switch 1 3Com 24Port 10/100Base-T Ethernet Switch (3C16411) 1 CCTV Equipment American Dynamics Video Matrix Switcher/Controller System 1 American Dynamics CCTV Keyboard (AD20AD8) 1 American Dynamics Code Distributor 1 Cohu CCTV Camera (current prt# 3925-3100/pole 1 Cohu Multi Conductor Interface Cable (includes proper Amphenol connectors) 1 AutoCAD Working / Asbuilt Drawings 1 RG59 Jumper Cables (Lot) 1 Fiber Jumper Cables (Lot) 1 Cable Labeling 1 Installation Consumables 1 Page 3 NETVERSANT WASHINGTON Confidential and Proprietary, (as referenced in Terms and Conditions)file:Netversant SOW - IBI co Voice and Data Cabling - Fiber Optics - RCDD En-ineering and Design - CAD Drafting - Norstar Phone Systems NetVersant Washington T98-MST-015 System Program & Test Project Management System Training (Typically a 4-8 hr session w/a refresher in 5 working days) Equipment Procurement Site Orientation Mobilization Assumptions of Scope: All required permits are excluded from pricing and will be charged at cost plus 12%. 2. All cable pathways will be easily accessible and free and clear from any obstruction. 3. Access will be provided in a timely manner to all facilities where work is requested. Delays and/or interruptions resulting from lack of access may result in additional charges. 4. Quote is based on standard installation procedures; any necessary custom installation and fabrication may result in additional charges. 5. No maintenance agreement included in this proposal for CCTV. NetVersant One year Warranty provided with all work within scope. Exempt From Scope: 1. Washington State Sales Tax. 2. The Administration fee (.005) per the Master Agreement. 3. Unforeseen circumstances or conditions not readily apparent. 4. Any and all permits and the process to obtain and permits. Testing and Documentation: (Fiber) 1. In addition to individual connector and dB loss testing, NetVersant Washington will perform end -to -end insertion loss testing of single mode fibers at 1310 nm and 1550 nm from one direction for each terminated span. 2. NetVersant Washington will inspect each single -mode fiber span for continuity and anomalies with an OTDR at 1310 nm and 1550 nm from both directions. 3. NetVersant Washington will provide final test documentation with fiber labeling Page 4 NETVERSANT WASHINGTON Confidential and Proprietary. (as referenced in Terms and Conditions)file:Netversant SOW - IBI co Voice and Data Cabling - Fiber Optics - RCDD Engineering and Design - CAD Drafting - Norstar Phone Systems NetVersant Washington T98-MST-015 Terms and Conditions: 1. Project Completion: A Standard of Performance Acceptance Sheet is to be signed upon completion and acceptance of project, (see attached). 2. Payment Terms: Installation will be invoiced upon completion and acceptance. Net 30 days. The Administration fee (.005) will be added to your invoice per the Master Agreement. Change Order: If changes are required during the course of this project, a change order will be provided and work will continue upon approval of such change order. 4. Warranty: NetVersant Washington warrants each installation performed by NetVersant Washington against defects in workmanship for a period of 1 year. Manufactures warranties will be provided upon completion of project. 5. These prices are good for a period of 30 days. 6. Confidential Information: This bid information is confidential and proprietary, for use only by the City of Renton. Thank you for considering NetVersant Washington for your cabling needs. If you have any questions, please contact me at (206) 774-7124. Thank you, Peter LaBarge Sales Engineer Steve Borowski Outside Plant/Fiber Optics Manager Acceptance of Proposal: Renton City Hall Signature Date Page 5 NETVERSANT WASHINGTON Confidential and Proprietary. (as referenced in Terms and Conditions)fileNetversant SOW - IBI co Voice and Data Cabling - Fiber Optics - RCDD Engineering and Design - CAD Drafting - Norstar Phone Systems NetVersant Washington T98-MST-015 Print Name/Title Purchase Order No. Page 6 NETVERSANT WASHINGTON Confidential and Proprietary, (as referenced in Terms and Conditions)fileNetversant SOW - IBI co Voice and Data Cabling - Fiber Optics - RCDD Engineering and Design -CAD Drafting - Norstar Phone Systems NetVersant Washington T98-MST-015 3849 P Ave. S. Seattle, WA. 98104 Ph: 206.340.1955 Fax: 206.340.1980 Customer Name: CERTIFICATION OF PERFORMANCE ACCEPTANCE Job Name: Customer PO Number: NV W Job Number: NVW Project Mgr: NetVersant Washington completed Scope of Work on (Date) All cable installation and termination was performed in accordance with the State of Washington Telecommunications Architectural Standards and the Master Agreement No. T98-MST-015. Scope of Work: Materials $ Labor Total $ Acceptance: The Scope of Work has been completed and is accepted. Signature Date Print Name/Title Department Page 7 NETVERSANT WASHINGTON Confidential and Proprietary, (as referenced in Terms and Conditions)file:Netversant SOW - IBI co Voice and Data Cabling - Fiber Optics - RCDD Engineering and Design - CAD Drafting - Norstar Phone Systems ITNetVersant network solutions for an e-world Mr. Robert H. Cavanaugh, P.E. February 3, 2003 City of Renton Revised 5/12/03 Transportation Systems Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Subject: Communications Installation / CCTV/Fiber Transmission Equipment - City of Renton General Scope of Work: Provide CCTV Materials as per Technical Specifications dated 7/15/02. TOTAL ITEM CITY MAT WSDOT - SR 167 Hub Optelecom 21 Card Chassis 1 $536.36 Optelecom Power Supply 1 $386.36 Optelecom 1 Slot Blank 2 $61.41 Optelecom 3 Slot Blank 4 $122 82 Optelecom 8 Channel Digital Video Mux/Transmit 1 $4,467.05 Optelecom 8 Channel Digital Video Mux/Transmit 1 $4,467.05 Kalatel Video Distribution Amplifier (KTS-250-16) 1 $544.32 Return TMC Fiber Equipment Optelecom 21 Card Chassis 1 $536.36 Optelecom Power Supply 1 $386.36 Optelecom 1 Slot Blank 3 $92 11 Optelecom 3 Slot Blank 3 $92.11 Optelecom 8 Channel Digital Video Mux/Transmit 1 $4,606.82 Optelecom 8 Channel Digital Video Mux/Transmit 1 $4,606.82 Optelecom Single Channel FM Video w/Data & Voice 1 $2,507.95 Optelecom Single Channel FM Video w/Data & Voice 1 $2,547.73 CCTV 3rd & Sunset Optelecom Single Channel FM Video w/Data & Voice 1 $2,547.73 Optelecom Power Supply 1 $53.92 WSDOT Shoreline $0.00 Optelecom Single Channel FM Video w/Data & Voice 1 $2,547.73 Optelecom Power Supply 1 $53.92 Renton TMC-Video & Network Equip. Sony 19" Hi Res Video Monitor 4 $2,909.09 NEC 50" Plasma Display 1 $8,654.44 NEC Plasma Display Speakers (Pair) 1 $710.23 NEC Plasma Display Mounting Kit 1 $214.77 Focus Enhancements Scan Converter 3 $681.82 Panasonic Time Lapse VCR (AG2580) 1 $373.86 Black Box 3 x 1 Data Switch 1 $80 82 3Com 24Port 10/100Base-T Ethernet Switch (3C16411) 1 $442.64 Mr. Robert H. Cavanaugh, P.E. Page Two: CCTV Equipment American Dynamics Video Matrix Switcher/Controller Sysl 1 $4,147.62 American Dynamics CCTV Keyboard (AD20AD8) 1 $1,188.10 American Dynamics Code Distributor 1 $800.00 Cohu CCTV Camera (current prt# 3925-3100/pole 1 $3,562.50 Cohu Multi Conductor Interface Cable (includes proper An 1 $568.18 Miscellaneous: AutoCAD Working / Asbuilt Drawings 0 $0.00 RG59 Jumper Cables (Lot) 0 $0.00 Fiber Jumper Cables (Lot) 0 $0.00 Cable Labeling 0 $0.00 Installation Consumables 0 $0.00 System Program & Test 0 $0.00 Project Management 0 $0.00 System Training (Typically a 4-8 hr session w/a refresher 0 $0.00 Equipment Procurement / Freight 1 $647.06 Site Orientation 0 $0.00 * Electrical Permit / Inspection 0 $0.00 Mobilization 0 $0.00 $56,146.06 Base Installation Bid Total: $56,146 The above prices DO NOT include Sales Tax, Permits, Bid Bonds or Performance Bonds. Notes and Exceptions: 1) No Spare Parts are included in this proposal. 2) No Maintenance agreement included in this proposal. 3) Materials only, all installation provided by others. 4) All equipment will hold Manufacturers warranty, shipping and handling charges may apply. Damage caused by faulty installation will not be covered. Mr. Robert H. Cavanaugh, P.E. Page Three: STANDARD ASSUMPTIONS AND CAVEATS (unless otherwise specified): 1) NetVersant requires a signed copy of this quotation before any work can begin. 2) This quotation is good for a period of thirty days. 3) All materials and workmanship shall meet or exceed EIA/TIA 568--569 and NEC codes. NetVersant guarantees the completed project for one year. All mud rings, pull strings, power poles, backboards, floor access and conduits to be provided by others, unless otherwise specified. 4) NetVersant reserves the right to require any modifications as required to meet EIA /TIA 568-569 specifications, local, State or NEC codes to accommodate cable installation. 5) Customer shall make premises available as soon as possible for material staging and pre -construction site survey. 6) Customer shall move, or make arrangements for others to move any furniture, files, shelves, computers, personnel belongings, or any other materials which obstructs placement of cabling. Such items must be moved by customer, prior to start of project. 7) Customer shall not locate any equipment which may cause Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) or Electromagnetic Interference (EMI), or Electrical Interference within 25 feet of cabling Main Distribution Frame (MDF). If the customer requests a location that does not comply with these conditions Netversant may, at its discretion void the warranty provision of this contract. 8) Customer shall assist in the preparation of as -built documentation by providing current copies of all required floor plans. These plans shall identify all work locations and Communications Rooms with labeling scheme. 9) This quotation does not include the removal of any existing cabling or equipment. 10) Technical support of customer hardware OR customer generated delays are billed at $ 70.00 per hour, per person on -site. This includes access to required rooms, hallways, closets ETC. 11) We have estimated this project using regular working hours, unless otherwise specified (7:00 AM to 5:00 PM). Additional work required during swing shift (2:30 PM to 10:30 PM) or off hours (before 7:00 AM) the labor rate will increase by 20%. Billing for Saturday work is on a time and a half basis, Sunday work will be billed at double time. 12) Additional work requested outside the General Scope is billed on a Time and Materials basis. 14) This quotation assumes that all materials are available through standard distribution channels. 15) All cable installed in existing conduits or raceways are based upon 40% fill, additional labor will be charged at the normal rate for cable installation in overfilled raceways. (If required). 16) Pricing structure is based upon the award of the entire project, if the entire project is not awarded to NetVersant as stated above, pricing will require re -negotiation. Mr. Robert H. Cavanaugh, P.E. Page four; NetVersant Wa, Incorporated certifies that it is licensed and regularly engaged in the business of installing Data / Voice and Low Voltage cable systems, State of Washington Limited Energy Contractors # NETVEI`98105, Exp Date 9-25-2004 NetVersant Wa, Incorporated is an IBEW Local 46 Union contractor. We look forward to working with you on this project, if you have any questions regarding this quote please contact me at (206) 774-7153. CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works Dept/Div/Board. Utility Systems Division / Water Utility Staff Contact J.D. Wilson (ext. 7295) Subject: CT Detention Pipeline for Wells R1, R2 & R3 and Park Improvements: CAG 02-082 - WTR-27-2893 Contractor: R.L. Alia Company Exhibits: Final Pay Estimate Notice of Completion of Public Works Contract Recommended Action: Council Concur AT N: , For Agenda of: Agenda Status Consent .............. Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Ordinance ............. Resolution........... . Old Business........ New Business....... Study Sessions...... Information........ . Approvals: Legal Dept......... Finance Dept...... Other ............... Fiscal Impact: N/A Expenditure Required $100.00 (final pay estimate only) Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted $450,000 (total budget in 2003) Revenue Generated Acct. No. 421.500.18.5960.34.65.055405 Total Project Budget $1,440,000 (2001 to 2003) City Share Total SUMMARY OF ACTION: 8/04/03 X The project started on September 9, 2002, was substantially completed on June 27, 2003 and fully completed on July 11, 2003. The original contract amount was $979,178.24 and the final contract amount is $1,039,108.45. The increase in total cost of $59,930.21, which is 6% of the original contract cost, was needed to cover unforeseen field conditions and additional work including the leveling of low spots in Liberty Park parking lot, replacement of the existing irrigation system, extra landscaping and site restoration, and the final color coating of the new basketball court. There are sufficient funds in the 2003 project budget to cover the additional work. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Utility Systems Division of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department recommends that the project be accepted, the final pay estimate be approved and the retainage of bond be released after 60 days, subject to the receipt of all required authorizations. H:\File Sys\WTR - Drinking Water Utility\WTR-27 - Water Project Files\WTR-27-2893 - CT Detention Pipeline & Park Improvements\R.L. Alia Company\Pay Estimates\agenda-bill-final-pay-est.doc STAr State of Washington Reg.No.: 04 Department of Revenue a x Audit Procedures & Administration Date: ws y� PO Box 47474 1889 aO Olympia, Washington 98504-7474 NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT From: City of Renton Finance Department 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Notice is hereby given relative to the completion of contract or project described below. Description of Contract CAG 02-082 CT Detention Pipeline for Wells R1, R2 & R3 and Park Improvements (City of Renton Water Project WTR-27-2893) Contractor's Name R.L. Alia Company Telephone No. (206) 722-4900 Contractor's Address 9215 M.L. King Way South Seattle, WA 98118 Date Work Commenced Date Work Completed Date Work Accepted September 9, 2002 July 11, 2003 August 4, 2003 Surety or Bonding Co. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America Agent's Address Theresa F. Huckabay, Bank of America Tower, 701 51h Avenue, Ste 3850, Seattle, WA 98104, Phone No. (206) 386-5772 Contract Amount: $899,980.00 Additions or Reductions: $55,082.91 Sales Tax: $84,045.54 Total $1,039,108.45 By Phone No: Amount Disbursed Amount Retained: Total: $1,039,108.45 $0 (Retainage Bond) $1,039,108.45 (Disbursing Officer) The Disbursing Officer must complete and mail THREE copies of this notice to the Department of Revenue, Olympia, Washington 98504-7474, immediately after acceptance of the work done under this contract. NO PAYMENTS SHALL BE MADE FROM RETAINED FUND until receipt of Department's certificate, and then only in accordance with said certificate. FORM REV 31 0020 (12-92) H:\File Sys\WTR - Drinking Water Utility\WTR-27 - Water Project Files\WTR-27-2893 - CT Detention Pipeline & Park Improvements\R.L. Alia Company\Pay Estimates\notice of completion.doc TO: FINANCE DIRECTOR FROM: PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATOR CONTRACTOR: R.L. Alia Company `VTRACT NO. CAG 02-082 ESTIMATE NO. 12th & Final PROJECT: CT Detention Pipeline for Wells R1, R2 & R3 and Park Improvements 1. CONTRACTOR EARNINGS THIS ESTIMATE $91.91 2. SALES TAX @ 8.80% $8.09 3. TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT THIS ESTIMATE $100.00 4. EARNINGS PREVIOUSLY PAID CONTRACTOR $954,971.00 5. EARNINGS DUE CONTRACTOR THIS ESTIMATE $91.91 6. SUBTOTAL - CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS $955,062.91 7. SALES TAX PREVIOUSLY PAID $84,037.45 8. SALES TAX DUE THIS ESTIMATE $8.09 9. SUBTOTAL - SALES TAX $84,045.54 GRAND TOTAL: $1,039,108.45 FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTION: PAYMENT TO CONTRACTOR (Lines 5 and 8): ACCOUNT # 421.000500.018.5960.0034.65.055405/55405/5354 $100.00 # 12th & Final $100.00 TOTAL THIS ESTIMATE: $100.00 CHARTER 116, LAWS OF 1965 CITY OF RENTON CERTIFICATION I, THE UNDERSIGNED DO HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, THAT THE MATERIALS HAVE BEEN FURNISHED, THE SERVICES RENDERED OR THE LABOR PERFORMED AS DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND THAT THE CLAIM IS A JUST, DUE AND UNPAID OBLIGATION AGAINST THE CITY OF RENTON, AND THAT I AM AUTHORIZED TO AUTHENTICATE AND CERTIFY TO SAID CLAIM Signed: '-4 pwrt'ut/ -Suit`( 3 Note: The contractor has a retainage bond; therefore the City is not withholding retainage. Printed On: 07/16/2003 City of Renton Public Works Department Page 1 Printed On: 07/16/2003 City of Renton Public Works Department Page 1 CT Detention Pipeline for Wells R1, R2 & R3 and Park Project: Improvements Contract Number: Contractor: R.L. Alia Company Pay Estimate 12th and Final Closing Date: Item Description Unit Est. Unit Previous Previous No. Quantity Price Quantity Amount Perform all work as specified as shown herein related to 001. Mobilization, Demobilization, Site Preparation and Clean-up Lump Sum 1 $67,000.00 Perform all work as specified as shown herein related to Reinforced Portland Cement Concrete Removal and 002. Disposal Lump Sum 1 $12,000.00 Perform all work as specified as shown herein related to Non -Reinforced Portland Cement Concrete Removal and 003. Disposal Lump Sum 1 $1,000.00 Perform all work as specified as shown herein related to Unscheduled Reinforced Portland Cement Concrete 004. Removal and Disposal Cubic Yard 2000 $15.00 Perform all work as specified as shown herein related to Unscheduled Non -Reinforced Portland Cement Concrete 005. Removal and Disposal Cubic Yard 415 $7.00 Perform all work as specified as shown herein related to 006. Asphaltic Cement Concrete Removal and Disposal Lump Sum 1 $10,000.00 Perform all work as specked as shown herein related to Unscheduled Asphaltic Cement Concrete Removal and 007. Disposal Cubic Yard 615 $45.00 Perform all work as specified as shown herein related to 008. Fencing & Miscellaneous Item Removal & Disposal Lump Sum 1 $8,000.00 Perform all work as specified as shown herein related to 009, Miscellaneous Site Work Lump Sum 1 $104,000.00 Perform all work as specified as shown herein related to 010. Miscellaneous Excavation Lump Sum 1 $12,000.00 Perform all work as specified as shown herein related to 011. Unscheduled Excavation Cubic Yard 50 $20.00 Perform all work as specified as shown herein related to Ott. Miscellaneous Backfill Lump Sum 1 $3,000.00 Perform all work as specified as shown herein related to 013. Unscheduled Backfill Cubic Yard 50 $20.00 Perform all work as specified as shown herein related to 014. Landscaping Lump Sum 1 $68,000.00 Perform all work as specified as shown herein related to 015. Trench Excavation Safety Systems and Shoring Lump Sum t $5,000.00 Perform all work as specified as shown herein related to 016. Traffic Control, Site Safety and Aquifer Protection Lump Sum 1 $25,000.00 Perform all work as specified as shown herein related to 017. Utility: 42-inch Diameter Steel Pipeline and Appurtenances Lump Sum 1 $370,000.00 Perform all work as specified as shown herein related to 018. Miscellaneous Utilities Lump Sum 1 $7,000.00 Perform all work as specified as shown herein related to 019. Irrigation System Lump Sum 1 $900.00 Perform all work as specified as shown herein related to 020. Parking Lot and Driveway Lump Sum 1 $38,500.00 Perform all work as specified as shown herein related to 021. Basketball Court Lump Sum 1 $41,500.00 Perform all work as specified as shown herein related to 022. Electrical Lump Sum 1 $40,000.00 CAG 02-082 07/16/2003 This This Total Total Quantity Amount Quantity Amour 1.00 $67,000.00 0.00 1.00 $12,000.00 0.00 1,00 $1,000.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 179.00 $1,253.00 0.00 1.00 $10,000.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 1.00 $8,000.00 0.00 1.00 $104,000.00 0.00 1.00 $12,000.00 0.00 50.00 $1,000.00 0.00 1.00 $3,000.00 0.00 50.00 $1,000.00 0.00 1.00 $68,000.00 0.00 1.00 $5,000.00 0.00 1.00 $25,000.00 0.00 1.00 $370.000.00 0.00 1.00 $7,000.00 0.00 0.50 $450.00 0.00 1.00 $38,500.00 0.00 1.00 $41,500.00 0.00 1.00 $40,000.00 0.00 $0.00 1.00 $67,000.00 $0.00 1.00 $12,000.00 $0.00 1.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 179.00 $1,253.00 $0.00 1.00 $10,000.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 1.00 $8,000.00 $0.00 1.00 $104,000.00 $0.00 1.00 $12,000.00 $0.00 50.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 1.00 $3,000.00 $0.00 50.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 1.00 $68,000.00 $0.00 1.00 55,000.00 $0.00 1.00 $25,000.00 $0.00 1.000 $370,000.00 $0.00 1.00 $7,000.00 $0.00 0.50 $450.00 $0.00 1.00 $38,500.00 $0.00 1.00 $41,500.00 $0.00 1.00 $40,000.00 Printed On: 07/16/2003 City of Renton Public Works Department Page 2 CT Detention Pipeline for Wells R1, R2 & R3 and Park Project: Improvements Contract Number: CAG 02-082 Contractor: R.L. Alia Company Pay Estimate 12th and Final Closing Date: 07/16/2003 Item Description Unit Est. Unit Previous Previous This This Total Total No. Quantity Price Quantity Amount Quantity Amount Quantity Amount Perform all work as specified as shown herein related to 023. Telemetry and Chlorine Monitoring System Modifications Lump Sum 1 $10,000.00 1.00 $10,000.00 0.00 $0.00 1.00 $10,000.00 Perform all work as specified as shown herein related to 024. Construction Surveying Lump Sum 1 $4,500.00 1.00 $4,500.00 0.00 $0.00 1.00 $4,500.00 Perform all work as specified as shown herein related to As- 025. builts. Lump Sum 1 $10,000.00 0.99 $9,908,09 0.01 $91.91 1.00 $10,000.00 C0#1 Change Sidewalk Finish SY 234 $15.00 234.00 $3,510.00 0.00 $0.00 234.00 $3,510.00 CO#2 Vandelism / Irrigation / Wire Mesh LS 1 $9,810.71 1.00 $9,810.71 0.00 $0.00 1.00 $9,810.71 CO#3 Irrigation / Test Panel / Wire Mesh LS 1 $3,166.96 1.00 $3,166.96 0.00 $0.00 1.00 $3,166.96 CO#4 Realign Parking Lot / Add'l Sidewalk / Driveway LS 1 $19,306.07 1.00 $19,306.07 0.00 $0.00 1.00 $19,306.07 CO#5 Color Coating, Irrigation, Curbing LS 1 $38,307.41 1.00 $38,307.41 0.00 $0.00 1.00 $38,307.41 CO#6 Light / Slab/ Bench LS 1 $13,308.42 1.00 $13,308.42 0.00 $0.00 1.00 $13,308.42 CO#7 Regrade Mound LS 1 $2,890.27 1.00 $2,890.27 0.00 $0.00 1.00 $2,890.27 CO#8 Additional Landscaping Restoration LS 1 $12,623.63 1.00 $12.623.63 0.00 $0.00 1.00 $12,623.63 CO#9 Parking Lot Pre -leveling Course LS 1 $11,000.00 1.00 $11,000.00 0.00 $0.00 1.00 $11,000.00 C0#10 Yard Drain & Landscape Restoration LS 1 $936.44 1.00 $936.44 0.00 $0.00 1.00 $936.44 Subtotal $954,971.00 $91.91 $955,062.91 8.8% Sales Tax $84,037.45 $8.09 $84,045.54 TT Total $1,039,008.45 $100.00 $1,039,108.45 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Al N: Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: 8/4/2003 Dept/Div/Board.. Utility Systems Division Agenda Status Staff Contact...... John Hobson, x-7279 Consent .............. X Public Hearing.. Subject: Kennydale Lakefront Sewer Improvements Correspondence.. Transfer of Funds Ordinance ............. Resolution........... . Old Business........ New Business....... Exhibits: Issue Paper Study Sessions...... Information........ . Recommended Action: Refer to Utilities Committee Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... -0- Amount Budgeted....... -0- Total Project Budget -0- Approvals: Legal Dept......... Finance Dept...... Other ............... Transfer/Amendment....... Revenue Generated......... City Share Total Project.. X $100,000 (from 45300 to 45190) SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Utility Systems Division of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department recommends that funds totaling $100,000 be transferred from Wastewater account 45300 (Sewer Main Replacement/Rehabilitation) to cover the additional costs and provide a sufficient construction contingency. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department that approval be given to transfer funds from the Sewer Main Replacement/Rehabilitation account to the Kennydale Lakefront Sewer Improvement account. H:\File Svs\WWP - WasteWater\WWP-27-3062 Kennydale Lake Line Rehab\Agenda TRANSFERFUNDS.doc\JDH\tb CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: July 28, 2003 TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: 51� Mayor Jesse Tanner FROM: Gregg ZimmermaLA:dt inistrator STAFF CONTACT: John Hobson (x-7279) SUBJECT: Kennydale Lakefront Sewer Improvement Project Request for Transfer of Funds ISSUE: The Construction Contract for the Kennydale Lakefront Sewer Improvement Project was awarded on June 9, 2003. The following is a break -down of the existing budget and expenses: 2003 Budget: $400,000 Cost to Date: $42,000 Construction Contract: $326,160 Remaining Consultant Contract: $31,500 Remaining budget: $340 The Wastewater Utility is initiating an addendum to the consultant contract to cover construction inspection that will cost $38,340. We are also requesting a 20% construction contingency. • The Utility Systems Division of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department recommends that funds totaling $100,000 be transferred from Wastewater account 45300 (Sewer Main Replacement/Rehabilitation) to cover the additional costs and provide a sufficient construction contingency. July 28, 2003 Page 2 BACKGROUND SUMMARY: The Kennydale Lakefront Sewer was constructed in 1972. The sewer was installed without adequate access points for cleaning and inspection. The Kennydale Lakefront Sewer Improvement Project will install 3 access manholes over the existing line and include sewer line cleaning and television inspection. Since the project is taking place in Lake Washington, full-time inspection is necessary to ensure compliance with all regulatory requirements. Additionally, due to the nature of an underwater sewer line, inspection of the sewer line may reveal other repairs that would be in addition to those shown in the construction contract. To cover the costs of the proj ect, we are recommending that $100,000 be transferred from Wastewater Utility Account 421.000400.018.5960.0035.65.045300 (WO# 45300 Sewer Main Replacement/Rehabilitation to Wastewater Utility Account 421.000400.018.5960.0035.65.045190 (WO# 45190 Kennydale Lakefront Sewer Improvements). This would decrease the budget of the Sewer Main Replacement/Rehabilitation from $1.2 million to $1.1 million. Due to re-scoping of the 2003 Sewer Main Replacement/Rehabilitation, this transfer is possible. The transfer will increase the budget of the Kennydale Lakefront Sewer Improvements project from $400,000 to $500,000. The new budget amount of $500,000 for the Kennydale Lakefront Sewer Improvements project will be sufficient to cover the construction contract, potential construction contingencies, staff time, and consultant engineering services during construction. CONCLUSION: Budget authority should be adjusted to cover the cost and provide sufficient contingency funds for the project. W:\WWP-27-3062 Kennydale Lake Line Rehab\ISSUE-fund-trans.doc\JDH\tb CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBMITTING DATA: Dept/Div/Board.. City Clerk Staff Contact... Bonnie Walton SUBJECT: Bid opening on July 30, 2003, for CAG-03-116, S. Grady Way and Rainier Ave. S. Pavement Rehabilitation Project EXHIBITS: Staff Recommendation Bid Tabulation Sheet (one bid) AI #: ` e ENDA OF: August 4, AGENDA STATUS: Consent......... X Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Ordinance....... Resolution...... Old Business.... New Business.... Study Session... Other........... RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPROVALS: Legal Dept...... Refer to Transportation Committee Finance Dept.... Other........... FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required... $446,862 Transfer/Amendment.. Amount Budgeted........ $500,000 Revenue Generated... SUMMARY OF ACTION: Engineer's Estimate: $410,730 RECOMMENDED ACTION: In accordance with Council procedure, the bid submitted at the subject bid opening met the following criteria: the bid was within the project budget and there were no irregularities. The bid submitted by Gary Merlino Construction Company, Inc. in the amount of $446,862, however, was the only bid received. Council procedure requires committee review when only one bid is received; therefore, staff recommends referral of the bid to the Transportation Committee. CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: July 31, 2003 TO: City Council VIA: Bonnie Walton, City Clerk %� FROM: Robert Lochmiller, x7303 6 1— Transportation Design, Project Manager SUBJECT: South Grady Way and Rainier Avenue South — Pavement Rehabilitation Project The existing pavement in the project area requires continued overlays due to the extensive bus and truck traffic. The project proposes removing the deteriorating roadway westbound thru and left turn lanes of South Grady Way from Rainier Avenue to approximately 550 feet east. The project will remove existing asphalt roadway and place new concrete pavement for the four lanes. The South Grady Way and Rainier Avenue South — Pavement Rehabilitation Project (Project #12212) is ranked number 53 in the 2003-2008 TIP and currently has $620,000 allocated. The sole bid submitted by Gary Merlino Construction Company bid of at $446,862 fell well within the projects budget for construction of $500,000 and was within ten percent of the engineer's estimate of $410,730. There were no irregularities in the bid. The Transportation Design Section would like to recommend that the contract be awarded to Gary Merlino Construction Company. The complicatedness of work, the stringent time frame to complete the project and the penalties of impacting traffic past the set construction hours made the project difficult for contractors to bid on. Additionally the project is strictly a concrete pavement project and typically Gary Merlino Construction Company has been awarded the majority of the concrete construction projects for the City of Renton, in the past. Due to receiving only one bid, Transportation Design Section also recommends that the Agenda Bill outlining this project go into Transportation Committee as soon as possible. cc: Leslie, Sandra, Rob, File Attachments C:\Documcnts and SeningAmpetersen\Local Settings\Temp\Contract Award Memo.doc 5ouin umay way & Hainier Ave 5ouin- Project Title: Pavement Rehabilitation BID DATE: July 30, 2003 Item No. Description Unit Est, Quan City of Renton Engineers Estimate Unit Bid Price Amount - 1 Mobilization LS 1 37,300.00 37,300.00 2 Roadway Surveying LS 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 3 Traffic Control Labor FIR 200 36.00 7,200.00 4 Temporary Traffic Control Devices LS 1 10,000.00 10,000.00 5 Roadside Cleanup LS 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 6 Removal of Structures and Obstructions LS 1 2,500.00 2,500.00 7 Roadway Excavation CY 1,220 45.00 54,900.00 8 Unsuitable Foundation Excavation CY 100 60.00 6,000.00 9 Shoring or Extra Excavation Class B SF 100 3.00 300.00 10 Crushed Surfacing Base Course TON 564 30.00 16,920.00 11 Asphalt Treated Base FA 1 50,000.00 50,000.00 12 Cement Concrete Pavement - 12 Hour, 12-inch Sectio SY 2,744 70.00 192,080.00 13 Catch Basin Type 1 EACH 2 1,000.00 2,000.00 14 Catch Basin Type 2-48" EACH 1 2,000.00 2,000.00 15 Adjust Catch Basin EACH 2 300.00 600.00 16 Temporary Erosion/Sedimentation Control FA 1 1,500.00 1,500.00 17 Type C Precast Traffic Curb LF 410 13.00 5,330.00 18 Type C Block Traffic Curb LF 180 15.00 2,700.00 19 Raised Pavement Marker, Type 1 HUND 3 500.00 1,500.00 20 Raised Pavement Marker, Type 2 HUND 1 700.00 700.00 21 Round Preformed Traffic Loop - 6 foot EACH 6 700.00 4,200.00 22 Plastic Crosswalk Stripe SF 220 10.00 2,200.00 23 Plastic Traffic Arrow EACH 8 100.00 800.00 Subtotal $410,730.00 Total $410,730.00 CITY OF RENTON BID TABULATION SHEET 'ROJECT: S. Grady Way & Rainier Ave. S. Pavement Rehabilitation; CAG-03-116 DATE: July 30, 2003 FORMS BID BIDDER Bid Triple Bond Form Gary Merlino Const. Co., Inc. X X $446,862.00 9125 loth Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98108 Brian J. Kittleson ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE TOTAL $410,730.00 LEGEND: Form: Triple Form: Non -Collusion Affidavit, Anti-Tnist Claims, Miitimum Wage CITY OF RENTCN RECE!VED CITY -IC From: Norm Wilcox <ngwilcox4 1eh�i�il.com> To: <dclauson@ci.renton.wa.us>, <tnelson@ci.renton.wa.us>, <dpersson @ ci. renton.wa.us> Date: 7/29/03 5:14PM This e-mail is in answer to a request made my members of the Public Safety Committee during a meeting on July 14 to give the members an indication of where monies earned through the sale of fireworks go. The Kennydale Lions Club (formerly Renton Highlands Lions) has been kicking off their fiscal year by selling fireworks as our first major fundraiser each June. We have been doing this for the past thirty or so years. Please be informed that ALL monies earned through public fundraisers are to be returned to the public per Lions Clubs International dictate. 100% of the funds taken in from fireworks are put back into the community. The following is a partial list of recipients of those funds: Adopt -a -Family u Numerous families in Renton have benefited through our donations of food, clothing and age appropriate gifts to families in need during the holiday season. Boys & Girls Little League Baseball/Softball u Sponsorship of these teams has kept both boys and girls active during the summer. Our funds provide for equipment and uniforms. Boy Scout Troop 490 u We sponsor and charter the Troop, provide funding for adult training and occasionally fund a scout for either leadership training or a stay at camp. Cub Scout Pack 490 u We sponsor and charter the Pack, provide funding for adult training and uniforms for a cub that can not afford one. Diabetes Camp u Recently, our Club provided the funding for two children to attend a week-long camping experience that is not normally available to someone who requires insulin injections and monitoring. This unique camp is specifically for those children. Education is also part of their camp experience; they learn about their disease and the many ways to deal with it either through diet or drugs and they learn that they are not alone. But best of all, they get to do the osummer campo thing. Hazen High School Scholarships u Our Lions Club presents two $1,000 scholarships each year to a graduating senior going on to college and we make available an additional $1,000 to a Hazen High graduate attending Renton Technical College. Highlands Community Association u our club has donated funds annually for the association's main summer gathering (TrestleFest and more recently the HCA Picnic). Leader Dogs For the Blind u Our club has provided funding not only to the organization, but also towards the expansion of the training facilities where both the dogs and the blind individuals are housed during the week-long regimen to bring them together as one. We have sponsored two people from the Renton community that have received a Leader Dog. Lions Health Screening Van u In a team effort with the other two Lions Clubs in Renton, we provide funding for the Health Screening Van to come during the Renton River Days celebration. This unit has the capability to screen visitors for diabetes and glaucoma, checks blood pressure, eyesight and hearing. Any deviations from norms are noted and the visitor is advised to visit a health care practitioner at their earliest convenience. Renton Clothing Bank - Our Club makes an annual donation to this organization to help defray the costs of their day-to-day operations. Renton Sailing Club u This group provides sailing lessons at Coulon Park during the summer. Oft times they give lessons to groups of underprivileged kids in the community and provide a basis for numerous Scouts to earn merit badges. When they had a need to replace worn-out lifejackets, our Club presented them with the funds to purchase the vests. Renton School District u the District recently needed help in completing funding to provide defibrillators in nine of their facilities. Our Club donated $1,500 to finish the approximately $23,000 that was needed. Senior Dinner u we provide an annual event at Evergreen Terrace by furnishing a meal, entertainment and company to the residents. Sight / Glasses u When a member of the Renton Community requires glasses, either a new pair or the repair of existing or has a need to see a doctor but can/F-t afford one, our Club steps up and provides funding to help these people get what they need. Hearing Aids u The same holds true for someone requiring hearing aid repair, replacement or screening and ultimately fitting and purchase of a new unit, our club will help fund the need. Spinoza Bear u This unique gift of a stuffed, talking bear has been presented to both a specific child by our Club and to Children/Es Hospital for their dispensing to a child who has a life terminating illness. These bears have a tape player in them that plays inspirational and motivational tapes to help the children cope with what is happening to them. The bears are allowed into every room in the hospitals, even an operating room. These bears are the one companion that the child has in all aspects of their stay in the hospital. Veteran/Es Memorial of Renton u Our Club was one of the major contributors that brought to fruition the Veteran/Es Memorial that was recently dedicated in downtown Renton. Also, our Club has several members and former members that now have had in their names as part of the memorial. These plaques were donated by the Club. MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE" http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus Norman (�, W 1 c O x -'ReAf on 1 Gv A q ?0 5(� APPROVED BY I C6Ty COUNCIL Date._ �1- ,W03 COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE REPORT August 4, 2003 Appointment to the Municipal Arts Commission July 21, 2003 The Community Services Committee recommends concurrence in the Mayor's appointment of Jeremy Chambers to the Municipal Arts Commission for an unexpired three-year term that expires December 31, 2003, replacing Virginia Corder who. resigned. August 4, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 273 OLD BUSINESS Community Services Committee Chair Nelson presented a report Community Services recommending concurrence in the Mayor's appointment of Jeremy Chambers to Committee the Municipal Arts Commission for an unexpired three-year term that expires Appointment: Municipal Arts December 31, 2003, replacing Virginia Corder who resigned. MOVED BY Commission I6 D�j P NELSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Finance Committee Finance Committee Vice Chair Corman presented a report recommending Finance: Vouchers approval of Claim Vouchers 217405 - 217810 and two wire transfers totaling $1,812,540.56; and approval of Payroll Vouchers 45295 - 45619, one wire transfer and 577 direct deposits totaling $1,864,932.15. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMTITEE REPORT. CARRIED. Transportation (Aviation) Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chair Persson presented a report Committee regarding the Berger/Abaco Engineers, Inc. contract for Duvall Ave. NE Transportation: NE Sunset intersection improvements design services. On October 14, 2002, the City was Blvd & Duvall Ave NE selected to receive a Hazard Elimination Safety Program grant for design and Intersection Improvements, construction funding for the Duvall Ave. NE and SR-900 (NE Sunset Blvd.) Berger/Abam Engineers Intersection Improvements Project. This project will reduce congestion and accident frequency at this intersection, which is currently a High Accident Location. The Transportation Division selected Berger/Abam Engineers, Inc. to design the project in the amount of $59,000, which will be carried out from 2003 through 2004, with construction to begin in 2005 and completed in 2006. The approved 2003 budget for Duvall Ave. NE (SR-900 to the northern City limits) project includes the improvements to the intersection of NE Sunset Blvd. and Duvall Ave. NE. The 2003 budget is $570,900 of which $59,000 has been split out for this intersection work. This project is being separated out and tracked financially due to the receipt of Federal funding. The Committee recommended that Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into the agreement with Berger/Abam Engineers, Inc. in the amount of $59,000 for design services for the Duvall Ave. NE intersection improvements. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Transportation: Duvall Ave Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chair Persson presented a report NE Improvements, regarding the contract with Berger/Abam Engineers, Inc. for the Duvall Ave. Berger/Abam Engineers NE widening project design services. On June 10, 2002, the City entered into an agreement with the Transportation Improvement Board to accept grant funding for design and construction for the Duvall Ave. NE Widening Project. The project will widen Duvall Ave. NE from two lanes to five lanes, from SR- 900 (NE Sunset Blvd.) to the northern City limits. This project along with other improvements should reduce congestion and accident frequency, raising levels of service towards the service standards adopted by the City to achieve compliance with the Growth Management Act. The Transportation Division has selected Berger/Abam Engineers, Inc. to design the project for the amount of $744,500, and the project will be carried out from 2003 through 2004, with construction scheduled to begin in 2005 and completed in 2006. The approved 2003 budget for this project allocates a total budget of $570,900 ($59,000 is allocated for the Duvall Ave. NE intersection improvement design services project). Funds in the amount of $269,675 have been split out for the mid -block City work in 2003. The remaining funding will come from the 2004 APPROVED By CiTY COUNCIL Date 3 COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE REPORT August 4, 2003 Appointment to the Municipal Arts Commission July 21, 2003 The Community Services Committee recommends concurrence in the Mayor's appointment of Jeremy Chambers to the Municipal Arts Commission for an unexpired three-year term that expires December 31, 2003, replacing Virginia Corder who resigned. Toni Nelson, Chair; �$ P 2t 5hi dA King Parker, Vice Chair 00 w " andy Gorman, Member.-. �.- - APPROVED BY FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT CITY COUNCIL August 4, 2003 Date .APPROVAL OF CLAIMS AND PAYROLL VOUCHERS The Finance Committee approves for payment on August 4, 2003, claim vouchers 217405-2178.10 and 2 wire transfers, totaling $1,812,540.56, and 577. direct deposits, payroll vouchers 45295- 4561.9, and 1 wjre..trani fer,-totaling $1,864,932.15. King Parker Chair - Corman, Vi Member 4 K TRANSPORTATION/AVIATION COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT . u3f 41 aoo3 93 APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL Date g ' aoo3 i Project: Berger/Abam:Engineers, Inc. Contract for Design Services on Duvall Avenue NE Intersection Improvements (July 21, 2003) On October 14, 2002, the City was selected to receive -a- Hazard Elimination Safety .(HES) grant funding for design and construction for the Duvall Avenue NE/SR-900 (NE Sunset Blvd.) Intersection Improvements Project. Improvements this project provides will reduce congestion and accident frequency at this intersection, which is currently a High Accident Location (HAL). The Transportation Division has selected Berger/Abam to design the project. The design contract is for $59,000, to be carried out from 2003 through 2004, with construction scheduled to begin in 2005 and,ycopleted in 2006. The approved 2003 budget for = tvall venu NE, SR 90oo north City limits includes the improvements to the intersection of S�' - d uvAll �e tuNE. The 2003 budget is $570,900 of which $59,000,ashbeen splt out for this intercion '*,work. This project is being separated out and tracked f1hanciall due to Federal fundn*',"' a � . 4 1 �, � . The Transportation Committee re' me4ds hat�Cou ,c l authorize e Mayor and City Clerk to enter into the agree 'vuith erge JA� tieYamoucit o$59,000 for design services for the Duvall Avenue N�Interse�hon..�pro�eni��ts Project s E Don Persson, Chair,5 = " Toni Nelson, Vice -Chair Terri Were, Member cc: Connie Brundage Leslie Lahndt James Wilhoit 4 � ;�`. m +fir KTransladmin/committee report/2003/Duvall Intersection Improvements TRANSPORTATION/AVIATION COMMITTEE, COMMITTEE REPORT i�u use `; �ao3 63 APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL Date Project: Berger/Abaco Engineers, Inc. Contract for Design Services for Duvall Avenue NE Widening (July 21, 2003) On June 10, 2002, the City entered into an agreement with the Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) to accept grant funding for design and construction for the Duvall Avenue NE Widening Project. The project will widen Duvall Avenue NE from two lanes to five lanes, from SR-900 (NE Sunset Blvd) to the north City limits. This project along with other improvements should reduce congestion and accident frequency, raising levels of service (LOS) towards the service standards adopted by the City to achieve compliance with the Growth Management Act (GMA). The Transportation Division has selected Berger/Abarn to design the projecc. .6 design eontract is for $744;500, to be carried out from 2003 through 2004, with construction�schetluledto begin in205 and be completed in 2006: A ` The approved 2003 budget for Duvall Avenue NE, SRA0 lanorthity limits, allocates a total budget 4-4 $570,900 ($59,000 is bemg�;allocated for the intersection of buvalt",and Sunset). $269,675 has been split out for the mid -block Cii?y worki 2( 33 � e framing funding will come from the 2004 budget allocation anticipated and approved in the0(42U9 T?xn the amount of $474,825. This project is being separated out and tracked tiianCi ly d Z o gg t funding -. The Transportation Committe6:, recommends"tl at Couridif auth< into the agreement with Berge /Ab'am in the amount ofIR $744 Avenue NE Widening Project.; 5 Don Persson, Chair r Toni Nelson, Vice -Chair Terri Br re, Member cc: Connie Brundage Leslie Lahndt James Wilhoit Mayor and City Clerk to enter design services for the Duvall H:Tmns/admin/commiltee report/2003/Duvall Widening TRANSPORTATION/AVIATION COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT f}uyusf 4, aoo3 APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL. Date 8- 2oa3 Project: Interagency Agreement with King County Regarding Improvements to Coal Creek Parkway (King County portion of Duvall Avenue NE Widening Project) (July 21, 2003) On June 10, 2002, the City entered into an agreement with the Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) to accept grant funding for design and construction of the Duvall Avenue NE Widening Project. The project will widen Duvall Avenue NE from two lanes to five lanes from SR-90U (NE Sunset Blvd) to the north City limits. This . project should reduce congestion and accident frequency, raising levels of service (LOS) towards the service standards adopted by the City to achieve compliance with the Growth . Management Act (GMA). King County has also enteredlnto� an agr�e(Anent wits die TIB to accept grant funding for design and construction forthe Widening/unprovemet oRDl Avenue NE directly north �.y of the City's Duvall Avenue NE Widening Project (between the tenton north city limits and the City of .Newcastle south c>ty lints a#SE95Wa Kin Coun and the Cityof Renton would like to woik together on htl'? r � ct :udder the project management of the City of Renton, with the County ncfiintis hf h%t%lesi ri ancicoistruction. g The Transportation Committee recomnaefid ; that 0uncil approve'the resolution authorizing the Mayor and City. Clerk td" enjer9 into the agreement�H10th=Kg County for the Duvall Avenue NE Widening Project iA unincorporated K pg ,County Don Persson, Chair �r Toni Nelson, Vice -Chair PE k.4AA 44 -4 Terri 11riere, Member cc: Connie Brundage Leslie Lahndt James Wilhoit H:Traans/Admin/committmeport/2003/Duvall Widening_King County Interlocal CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 3 � q g A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING SIGNATURE FOR DEPOSITORIES AND ELECTRONIC FUND TRANSFERS ON BEHALF OF AND IN THE NAME OF THE CITY OF RENTON. WHEREAS, the City of Renton maintains one or more accounts at one or more qualified public depositories including the state operated Local Government Investment Pool for primary banking, investing, or third party trust agreement purposes; and WHEREAS, the City's appointed Finance & Information Services Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to open and maintain these accounts as required from time to time on behalf of and in the name of the City of Renton; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The depositories are hereby authorized to honor and pay checks, drafts, and similar instruments in the name of the City of Renton and signed by any one of the following officers and officials of the City of Renton: Title Name Mayor Jesse Tanner Finance & Information Services Administrator Victoria Runkle SECTION II. Any of the above named officers or officials are further authorized to endorse any such checks, drafts, or other instruments made payable to the City of Renton for the purpose of depositing same into the City's accounts. 1 SECTION III. RESOLUTION NO. The designated depository for the account in the name of City of Renton Municipal Court (Municipal Court account) is hereby authorized to honor and pay checks, drafts, and similar instruments signed by the Court Services Director or Municipal Court Judge. The Director or Judge are further authorized to endorse checks, drafts, or other instruments made payable to the City of Renton for the purpose of depositing the same into the Municipal Court account. Title Court Services Director Name Joseph T. McGuire Municipal Court Judge Terry L. Jurado SECTION IV. The following individuals are authorized to initiate and/or approve electronic fund transfers for the purposes of disbursing and depositing City funds for the purposes of investing, cash management, and accomplishing authorized City business in the City's name: Title Name Initiate A rove Finance & Information Services Administrator Victoria Runkle No Yes Fiscal Services Director Elaine Gregory Yes Yes Finance Analyst Supervisor Linda Parks Yes Yes Finance Analyst Linda Dixon Yes No SECTION V. There shall be no obligation on the part of the depositories to see the application of funds in any case whatsoever, and that a true copy of this resolution be certified and delivered to each said depository at the time any such account is opened on behalf of the City of Renton. SECTION VI. Section IV of Resolution No. 3603, passed and approved on November 25, 2002, is hereby repealed. 2 RESOLUTION NO. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2003. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2003. Jesse Tanner, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.996:7/25/03 CITY OF RENTON, WASMNGTON RESOLUTION NO. 9 to,49 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT BETWEEN KING COUNTY AND THE CITY OF RENTON REGARDING IMPROVEMENTS TO COAL CREEK PARKWAY, FROM THE RENTON CITY LIMITS IN THE VICINITY OF NE 23RDST. AND NE 24T11 ST. TO SE 95T11 WAY. WHEREAS, the County has a capital improvement project on Coal Creek Parkway from the Renton city limits near NE 23`a St. and NE 24 h St. to SE 95'h Way; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton also has a capital improvement project on Coal Creek Parkway, from SR 900 to Renton's city limits; and WHEREAS, the County and City agree that the construction of these projects shall provide an important link in the regional transportation system; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the parties to establish a lead agency to manage and provide for the design, environmental review, permitting and construction of these projects; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to document the terms and conditions of this Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION H. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into an agreement with King County entitled "Interagency Agreement between King County and the City 1 RESOLUTION NO. of Renton Regarding Improvements to Coal Creek Parkway, from the Renton City Limits in the Vicinity of NE 23rd St. and NE 24`h St. to SE 94t' Way." PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2003. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2003. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.993:6/24/03:ma Jesse Tanner, Mayor 2 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 50 15 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, VACATING A PORTION OF WHITWORTH AVENUE SOUTH BETWEEN SOUTH 3" AND 4TH STREETS, AND A PORTION OF THE ALLEY RUNNING NORTH AND SOUTH BETWEEN WHITWORTH AND MORRIS AVENUES SOUTH AND SOUTH 3" AND 4TH STREETS. (ST. ANTHONY PARISH; VAC-00-003) WHEREAS, a proper petition for vacating a portion of Whitworth Avenue South between South P and 4t'' Streets, and a portion of the alley running north and south between Whitworth and Morris Avenues South and South 3`d and 4t' Streets, was duly filed with the City Clerk on or about June 26, 2000, and said petition having been signed by the owners representing more than two-thirds (2/3) of the property abutting upon such street sought to be vacated; and WHEREAS, the City Council, by Resolution No. 3494 passed and approved on March 26, 2001, and after due investigation did fix and determine the day of April 23, 2001, at the hour of 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the City of Renton to be the time and place for a public hearing thereon; and the City Clerk having given due notice of such hearings in the manner provided by law, and all persons having been heard appearing in favor or in opposition thereto, and the City Council having considered all information and arguments presented to it; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 3623, passed and approved on March 10, 2003, the Council authorized a Development Agreement between St. Anthony's and the City of Renton, which was recorded with King County on May 14, 2003; WHEREAS, the Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department having duly considered said petition for said vacation, and having found same to be in the public interest 1 ORDINANCE NO. and for the public benefit, and no injury or damage to any person or properties will result from such vacation; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The following described parts of Whitworth Avenue South and parallel alley, to wit: (A portion of Whitworth Avenue South between South P and 0' Streets, and a portion of the alley running north and south between Whitworth and Morris Avenues South and South 3` and 4`h Streets) See Exhibits "A," `B," and "C" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein be and the same is hereby vacated subject to an easement over, across, under and on all that part as described on Exhibits "A" and `B" in favor of the City. This easement is for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, installing, repairing, replacing, enlarging, operating and maintaining utilities and utility pipelines, including, but not limited to, water, sewer and storm drainage lines, together with the right of ingress and egress thereto without prior institution of any suit or proceedings of law and without incurring any legal obligation or liability therefor. The City may from time to time construct such additional facilities as it may require. This easement is subject to the following terms and conditions: That a utility easement be retained over the entire right-of-way, with the understanding that the property may be developed fully if the existing utilities are relocated at the sole cost of the developer; and That this easement shall run with the land described herein, and shall be binding upon the 2 ORDINANCE NO. parties, their heirs, successors in interest and assigns. This vacation is further subject to that certain Development Agreement between the City and the Petitioner, filed May 14, 2003, under auditor's file number 20030514000836. SECTION H. The City Council hereby elects to charge a fee of $137,520 (One Hundred Thirty -Seven Thousand, Five Hundred and Twenty Dollars) to the petitioner -owners, said amount being 75% of the City's appraised value of the right-of-way interest herein vacated, and such charge being reasonable and proper. SECTION III. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after its publication. A certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed with the Office of Records and Elections, and as otherwise provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2003. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2003. Jesse Tanner, Mayor 3 ORDINANCE NO. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1039:7/17/03:ma EXI-IIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION STREET VACATION VAC-00-003 Beginning at the northeast corner of Lot 22, Block 1, Smithers Fifth Addition to the Town of Renton, According to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 16 of Plats, Page 33, records of King County, Washington; Thence South 89°38'01" East, a distance of 60.00 feet, to the northwest corner of Lot 9, Block 1, Smithers Fourth Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, Page 19, records of King County, Washington; Thence South 00°20'32" West, along the west line of said Block 1 of Smithers Fourth Addition to the Town of Renton, a distance of 274.43 feet, to the beginning of a curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 12 feet and a central angle of 56026'34" and being subtended by a chord which bears South 61'26'11" East, a distance of 11.35 feet; Thence southeasterly and easterly along said curve, being the northerly margin of a parcel of land conveyed to the City of Renton by instrument filed under Recording Number 7305180517, records of King County, Washington, a distance of 11.82 feet, to a point of cusp with the south line of said Block 1 of Smithers Fourth Addition to the Town of Renton; Thence North 89°40'04" West, along the said south line and its westerly extension, a distance of 40.00 feet, to a point on the easterly extension of the south line of said Block 1, Smithers Fifth Addition to the Town of Renton; Thence North 89°39'25" West, along the said south line and its easterly extension, a distance of 40.00 feet, to a point of cusp on a curve concave to the northwest having a radius of 12 feet and a central angle of 56026'34" and being subtended by a chord which bears North 62°07' 15" East, a distance of 11.35 feet; Thence easterly and northeasterly along said curve, being the northerly margin of a parcel of land to be conveyed to the City of Renton by instrument filed under Recording Number 7305180515, records of King County, Washington, a distance of 11.82 feet, to a point on the east line of said Block 1 of Smithers Fifth Addition to the Town of Renton; Thence North 00020'32" East, along said line, a distance of 274.43 feet, to the Point of Beginning. ALL SITUATE in the Southeast Quarter of Section 18, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. LEGAL DESCRIPTION STREET VACATION VAC-00-003 A portion of the alley located in Block 1 of Smithers Fourth Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, Page 19, records of King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of Lot 15 of said plat; Thence northerly along the westerly right-of-way margin of said alley, a distance of 160 feet, to the northeast corner of Lot 12 of said plat; Thence easterly along the easterly projection of the northerly boundary line of said Lot 12, a distance of 16 feet, to the northwest corner of Lot 19 of said plat; Thence southerly along the easterly right-of-way margin of said alley, a distance of 160 feet, to the southwest corner of Lot 16 of said plat; Thence westerly along the westerly projection of the southerly boundary line of said Lot 15, a distance of 16 feet, to the Point of Beginning. ALL SITUATE in the Southeast Quarter of Section 18, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. Exhibit C Y y C, CD Cz S 3rd Street S 4th Street CO 1 CO CI) Street Vacation VACOO-.003 Tom Boyns, Technical Services St. Anthony Church 0311=001 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 5 b f � AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, VACATING A PORTION OF THE ALLEY RUNNING NORTH AND SOUTH BETWEEN WHITWORTH AND MORRIS AVENUES SOUTH AND SOUTH 3R') AND 4TH STREETS. (ST. ANTHONY PARISH, VAC-03- 001) WHEREAS, a proper petition for vacating a portion of the alley running north and south between Whitworth and Morris Avenues South and South P and 4ih Streets was duly filed with the City Clerk on or about January 17, 2003, and said petition having been signed by the owners representing more than two-thirds (2/3) of the property abutting upon such street sought to be vacated; and WHEREAS, the City Council, by Resolution No. 3 62 1, passed and approved on February 24, 2003, and after due investigation did fix and determine the day of March 24"', 2003, at the hour of 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the City of Renton to be the time and place for a public hearing thereon; and the City Clerk having given due notice of such hearings in the manner provided by law, and all persons having been heard appearing in favor or in opposition thereto, and the City Council having considered all information and arguments presented.to it; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 3623, passed and approved on March 10, 2003, the Council authorized a Development Agreement between St. Anthony's and the City of Renton, which was recorded with King County on May 14, 2003, under auditor's file number 20030514000836, which is applicable according to its terms to the alley being vacated by this ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department having duly considered said petition for said vacation, and having found same to be in the public interest 1 ORDINANCE NO. and for the public benefit, and no injury or damage to any person or properties will result from such vacation; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The following described part of Whitworth Avenue South, to wit: (A portion of the alley running north and south between Whitworth and Morris Avenues South and South P and 4th Streets) See Exhibits "A" and `B" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein be and the same is hereby vacated subject to an easement over, across, under and on all that part as described on Exhibit "A" in favor of the City. This easement is for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, installing, repairing, replacing, enlarging, operating and maintaining utilities and utility pipelines, including, but not limited to, water, sewer and storm drainage lines, together with the right of ingress and egress thereto without prior institution of any suit or proceedings of law and without incurring any legal obligation or liability therefor. The City may from time to time construct such additional facilities as it may require. This easement is subject to the following terms and conditions: That a utility easement be retained over the entire right-of-way, with the understanding that the property may be developed fully if the existing utilities are relocated at the sole cost of the developer; and That this easement shall run with the land described herein, and shall be binding upon the parties, and their heirs and successors in interest and assigns. This vacation is further subject to that certain Development Agreement between the City 2 ORDINANCE NO. and the Petitioner, filed May 14, 2003, under auditor's file number 20030514000836. SECTION 11. The City Council hereby elects to charge a fee of $14,400 (Fourteen Thousand, Four Hundred Dollars) to the petitioner -owners, said amount being 75% of the City's appraised value of the right-of-way interest herein vacated, and such charge being reasonable and proper. SECTION 1II. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after its publication. A certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed with the Office of Records and Elections, and as otherwise provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2003. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2003. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1040:7/18/03:ma K Jesse Tanner, Mayor 10-1113 I�i71 :1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION STREET VACATION VAC-03-001 A portion of the alley located in Block 1 of Smithers Fourth Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, Page 19, records of King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of Lot 11 of said plat; Thence northerly along the westerly right-of-way margin of said alley, a distance of 120 feet, to the northeast corner of Lot 9 of said plat; Thence easterly along the easterly projection of the northerly boundary line of said Lot 9, a distance of 16 feet, to the northwest corner of Lot 22 of said plat; Thence southerly along the easterly right-of-way margin of said alley, a distance of 120 feet, to the southwest corner of Lot 20 of said plat; Thence westerly along the westerly projection of the southerly boundary line of said Lot 20, a distance of 16 feet, to the Point of Beginning. Situate in the Southeast Quarter of Section 18, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. z®j Shattuck Ave S W V �F vC ^ rt r"}, D � � rt o � 3rn Whitworth Ave S o rn Cr D X _. o o D Cr 07 w rt! �o �w 00 c� g Morris Ave S '-Pcx- I led CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTERS 4-2, 4-3, AND 4-4 OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON" TO ALLOW URBAN STYLE MULTI- FAMILY HOUSING IN THE SUBURBAN CENTER OVERLAY DISTRICT WITHIN THE HIGHLANDS REDEVELOPMENT AREA. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Subsection "Attached dwellings" in Section 4-2-060.C, Residential, of Chapter 2, "Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards," of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to change the text in the CS cell from "P20" to "P73." SECTION II. Section 4-2-080.A, "Conditions Associated With Zoning Use Tables," of Chapter 2, "Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards,"of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended by adding a new subsection, 73, to read as follows: 73. a. Subject to the density limitations located in the development standards for this zone. Projects within the Suburban and Neighborhood Center Residential Bonus District, RMC 4-3-095.B.3, are also subject to the provisions and development standards in RMC 4-3-095.0 and D, Suburban and Neighborhood Center Residential Bonus District. b. Within the Center Village (CV) Comprehensive Plan designation, attached dwelling unit developments in the range of 10 to 20 dwelling units per net acre may only be townhouse unit types. 1 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION III. The CN and CS zone cells of the "Maximum Density within Suburban and Neighborhood Residential Bonus District9" portion of Section 4-2-120.A of Chapter 2, "Zoning Districts — Uses And Standards," of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" are hereby amended to read as shown in Attachment 1. SECTION IV. The CS zone cell of "Minimum Onsite Landscape Width Along the Street Frontage Required When a Commercial Lot is Adjacent$ to Property Zoned Residential, RC, R-1, R-5, R-8, R-10, R-14, or FM'portion of Section 4-2-120.A of Chapter 2, "Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards," of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as shown in Attachment 2. SECTION V. Sections 4-3-095.B.1, 2, and 3 of Chapter 3, "Environmental Regulations and Overlay Districts," of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" are hereby amended to read as follows: 4-3-095.B APPLICABILITY: This section applies to all residential development and mixed commercial/residential development proposed within the following districts. 1. Centers Residential Bonus District A: That area depicted in subsections B.4.a and BA.b of this Section within one hundred fifty feet (150') of the public right -of- ways of Sunset Blvd. NE and NE 4th St. within the Suburban Center and Neighborhood Center Zoning Designations. 2 ORDINANCE NO. 2. Centers Residential Bonus District B: That area depicted in subsections BA.a, and BA.b of this Section beginning one hundred fifty feet (150') from the public rights -of -way of Sunset Blvd. NE and NE 4th St. within the Suburban Center and Neighborhood Center Zoning Designations. 3. Centers Residential Bonus District C: That area depicted in subsection BA.c of this Section within the Suburban Center Zoning Designation. SECTION VI. Section 4-3-095.B.4 of Chapter 3, "Environmental Regulations and Overlay Districts," of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as shown in Attachment 3. SECTION VII. Sections 4-3-095.0 and D of Chapter 3, "Environmental Regulations and Overlay Districts," of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" are hereby amended to read as shown in Attachment 4. SECTION VIII. Section 4-3-095.E of Chapter 3, "Environmental Regulations and Overlay Districts," of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows: E. MODIFICATION PROCEDURE: To provide greater flexibility in meeting the purpose of the Centers Residential Bonus District, projects within Districts A and B that do not meet the special development standards of subsection D of this Section may be approved through a modification process when superior design is demonstrated. Except for projects within District C, application may be made for modification of these development standards pursuant to RMC 4-9-250.D and the decision 3 ORDINANCE NO. criteria stipulated in RMC 4-9-250.D.2. For a modification to be granted, applicants must comply with the design criteria in RMC 4-9-250.D.2 and D.3. Projects within District C must request a variance to deviate from these code provisions. SECTION IX. The "Attached dwellings (structured parking) in the CD, RM-U, and RM-T Zones:" and the "Attached dwellings (surface parking/private garage/carport parking) in CD, RM-U, and RM-T Zones:" portions of the Parking Use Table, in Section 4-4-080.F.1 O.e of Chapter 4, "City -Wide Property Development Standards," of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" are hereby amended to consolidate the two rows and to read as shown in Attachment 5. SECTION X. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after its publication. PASSED BY.THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 2003. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2003. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: _ ORD.1041:7/23/03:ma Jesse Tanner, Mayor 4 NSITY (Net Density in yelling Units per Net Acre) ximum Density Within burban and Neighborhood sidential Bonus Distric? Attachment 1 CN iistrict A (RMC 4-3-09 nd b) to 60 dwelling units per net may be granted for vision of: (a) mixed use jects defined as a minimum th of 30 feet of commercial on the first floor of the nary structure facing the Trial, and (b) parking losed under or enclosed iin the first floor of the nary structure with either or rear access. B (RMC 4-3-095B4a nd b) bonus for architectural novatibn may be approved up a total of 36 dwelling units pe I acre through the edification process of RMC 4- D95E and the design criteria RMC 4-9-250D3. riot A (RMC b) p to 60 dwelling units per net -re may be granted for 'ovision of: (a) mixed use 'ojects defined as a minimum ?pth of 30 feet of commercial ;e on the first floor of the imary structure facing the terial, and (b) parking nclosed under or enclosed Thin the first floor of the imary structure with either or rear access. rict B (RMC 4-3-095B4a b) % bonus for architectural nnovation may be approved up o a total of 36 dwelling units pei iet acre through the modification process of RMC 4- 3-095E and the design criteria A RMC 4-9-250D3. C (RMC 4-3-095B4c) to 80 dwelling units per net 3 may be granted for vision of: (a) a minimum ith of 30 feet and a minimum ath of 60 feet of commercial on the first floor of the nary structure, and (b) king enclosed under or losed within the first floor of primary structure. Attachment 2 LANDSCAPING CS Minimum Onsite Landscape 15 ft. wide landscape buffer is Width Along the Street required 3 unless otherwise Frontage Required When a determined by the Reviewing Commercial Lot is Adjacen? Official through the site plan o Property Zoned review process. Residential, RC, R-1, R-5, R-8, R-10, R-14, or RM Attachment 3 4. Centers Residential Bonus District Maps: a. ral NE 2nd SI C. M Area B = Area C This figure is a graphic representation, not guaranteed to survey accuracy. To find the district(s) applicable to a specific parcel, refer to RMC 4-3-095B1, B2, and 133. Attachment 4 4-3-095.0 USES PERMITTED IN CENTERS RESIDENTIAL BONUS DISTRICT(S): The following residential uses are permitted in addition to all other nonresidential uses, existing flats/townhomes, and accessory uses permitted in the underlying zoning. Flats, when in a mixed use structure that combines residential with a first floor commercial use(s) and when located above the first floor. Adult family homes 4-3-095.1) Detached dwelling Semi -attached dwelling, up to 4 consecutively attached Townhouses, up to 4 consecutively attached Adult family homes Boarding and lodging houses Group homes II, for 6 or less Group homes Il, for 7 or more Retirement residences Flats or townhouses, when in a mixed use structure that combines residential with a first floor commercial use(s). Adult family homes SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL USES AND RESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL USES LOCATED WITHIN THE CENTERS RESIDENTIAL BONUS DISTRICT: Unless special development standards are specified below in this subsection, the development standards listed in the underlying CS and CN zoning are applicable. The modification procedure specified in subsection E of this Section may be used for residential and residential/commercial mixed use projects proposing to exceed the development standards in this subsection. 1 Site Layout NA Provide access and NA infrastructure to serve the development equivalent to those requirements established in the subdivision regulations. On -site Open None None Attached housing Space developments of 10 or Requirement more dwelling units shall provide a minimum aggregated area of common open space or recreation area of at least 50 square feet per unit. The location, layout, and proposed type of common space or recreation area shall be subject to approval by the Reviewing Official. Minimum Land None Minimum Land Area per None Area per Dwelling Dwelling Unit: 1,200 sq. ft. Unit including building footprint. Within this square footage 250 sq. ft. must be developed in landscaping or private yard abutting each unit. s . �.1 i NW Minimum Lot Size None None None Maximum Lot Use standards in the base 65% Use standards in base zone. Coverage For zone. Buildings Setbacks, General Use standards in the base A 3 ft. minimum side setback Use standards in base zone. zone. is required and no projections are allowed (e.g., eaves, bay windows) within the setback. Special Setbacks — Not subject to maximum Not subject to maximum Not subject to maximum Detached setback. Not permitted setback. Not permitted within setback. Not permitted Accessory Garages within 20 ft. of a public 20 ft. of a public street. within 20 ft. of a public street. Garages must Garages must provide a street. Garages must provide a minimum 24 ft. minimum 24 ft. of back out provide a minimum 24 ft. of back out space space including the alley. of back out space including including the alley. the alley. ^` I ..` .,�w+ A F"`'7 - �ljn %•rF �C x.t - n J -.kut:v i^vl-..nim �or ' "� u1\ _ $. r �:'t-r ,e 3._i. Building Design 1) Variation 1) Variation or modulation 1) Variation or modulation of vertical and of vertical and I modulation of vertical and Standards horizontal facades is horizontal facades is horizontal facades is required at a minimum of required at a minimum required at a minimum of 2 2 ft. at an interval of a of 2 ft. at an interval of ft. at an interval of a minimum of 40 ft. on a a minimum of 40 ft. on minimum of 40 ft. on a building face. a building face. building face. 2) Modulation of I 2) roof lines is required Private residential entry features which are designed to provide individual ground floor connection to the outside are required. 2) Modulation of roof lines is required. 3) Building must be oriented to the street and have the primary building pedestrian entry(ies) facing the street and clearly visible from the street. 4) Project must provide direct pedestrian access to abutting uses. Maximum No requirement 100 ft., except for retirement No requirement Building Length residences. Building Location None The relationship of the None Standards dwelling, parking and the street shall 'create the appearance of a single family neighborhood. Residential units and any associated commercial development within an overall development shall be connected through organization of roads, block, yards, central places, pedestrian linkages and amenity features. Front facades of structures shall address the public street, private street or court by providing: a landscaped pedestrian connection, and an entry feature facing the front yard. 91 Garage Not permitted to open Not permitted to open Not permitted to open Structure/Entry directly onto a principal directly onto a principal or directly onto a principal and Exit arterial street. minor arterial street. arterial street. Maximum Units No requirement 4 units maximum No requirement per Building Maximum Height 50 ft. 35 ft. 50 ft. T ARM V Parking Location As required in RMC 4-4- As required in RMC 4-4-080 As required in RMC 4-4- 080 with the following with the following additional 080 with the following additional requirements. requirements. additional requirements. The required number of Must be within an enclosed Parking for the residential parking spaces for the structure (detached or component of the project residential units shall be attached garage). Garage must be within a structured provided within an must be located on a different parking garage. enclosed garage. The fagade from the main entry of required .25 guest spaces the building. The required .25 Commercial and guest per residential unit may guest spaces per attached parking may be provided be surface parking. No residential units may be as surface parking so long more than 6 stalls may be surface parking. No more as no parking shall be consecutively clustered than 6 stalls may be located between a building without an intervening consecutively clustered and the property line landscaped area of a without an intervening abutting a public street. minimum of 5 ft. in width landscaped area of a by the length of the stall. minimum of 5 ft. in width by Parking garages shall be Surface parking not the length of the stall. designed so as not to permitted within the first Surface parking not allowed dominate the fagade of the 30 ft. of any street within the first 30 ft. on any residential building. frontage. street frontage. Parking must Parking garage entries be located to the rear of the shall be designed to primary structure or in a minimize the apparent detached garage with rear width of garage entries so access. as not to subordinate the pedestrian entry of the structure. Parking within the building shall be enclosed or screened through any combination of walls, decorative grilles, or trellis work with landscaping. Parking garages shall be designed to use similar forms, materials, and details of the residential portion of the building. Attachment 5 ATTACHED DWELLINGS IN CD, RM-U, AND RM-T ZONES: Resident and guest spaces: Within the CD, CS (only District C as shown in RMC 4-3-095B.4.a), RM-U, and RM T Zones: 1.8 per 3 bedroom or larger dwelling unit; 1.6 per 2 bedroom dwelling unit; 1.2 per 1 bedroom or studio dwelling unit. RM T Zone Exemption: An exemption to the standard parking ratio formula may be granted by the Development Services Director allowing 1 parking space per dwelling unit for developments of less than 5 dwelling units with 2 bedrooms or less per unit provided adequate on -street parking is available in the vicinity of the development.