Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA99-186 \� v,; \ 1�; I. i SOUTH 405 PLACE �Z1 ta'� 53 . '\ 7• VICINITY MAI7 nn ` ` : .•', _ :11 �-_-fir: ;� �1 ', e� _--___. l_ vrj:_... -- — N kale 1" - 200' ... • • Z•�I i, r . =_= _ iii r r c s -, l -„-� . . ,z `^f I\`{ I h, } 2 I I '16 �l2 2 ZT 28 Zg JIB c r 7 .. ....... . , _ ,' » �,, G�1� pf WA R Op, - I �'1 1113 12 II 101 L; ,�-- 1S 2� r✓� 78,8 `I --� ,I • ��� R a G _ - l'r - Ir 19 20 21 2213 •st ,..u- r 1�,• �, I' �^ c. IQ 91I8 1 .1--�Jr — 'r 15 16 11 „Q. ' $ I.. "Q, if .W.) ; t ,J_.i�-• ' - 13 12 11 -L�I`- - 1 �, j'' ..7 1' I, c L-'`� • 1 1 16 IS I'l 53� $5 r j ---1- - •5 I q o " r p 5 3. • �� ,: z Zr,So I9 le 11 f:- I'A5 ,� A7 'r 1 5� y,� �`'LI(�HT° m • a 0 Is ~i� 1t II ID 9, M ,r ,>{i2���x o 2 Z'I 2' 41 42 43 q _I i I z6' s'�I•'0' ; �-a.w �_" j i 5 , 1: � f.j 39�40 �� b0 �25 �� .. ;�.. 4 J Li o 11 0.3 to' ,�:` :y" �,-��-- ^, `-3�j6�31r� I .�.j- ���o i�,:• � 1 6 5 2' y � j' lu .:j::: `'` ,� ':;.: I33 34 �" v r tr`' Io 9I8 ( - 18 19 , '�,� w �® �F [� �_ —� sn %'/ I t9;3013►I321 I IP L II L-?�;!1 2 S ut Q cz tP ' t 1 _1--_.— q t p'P U `,,I,,6� 'i ��� %I'' 1 �r�— �� I ;S 4 3 Z I if .i �101 22 23 I o Q I �� �. \� 1 VI'8'!C ` i (0 9 B L -'-':------r-- t�4 1S 16 Il � f?I " '' '- r k1 Be13 53` 56 --' to `}':� '`� Ir,� _ r 121 20 19- 11 16 15 -� 4�7 ,t�rd 5a 51 51 �:! �� �'f• i it Q 4U Z1 .6 Z2 4A 13 �2 - i7,T7TnAV _-r-z^-rrrr.>• T � . z.+.•- ••• > 7¢Q r 730NOfME3 . _.r.-*�" ..•�_• •_..�.._ , — LJMITE cr.(5 5 U • _, r I}2 --t— rtrt--- fr- 1 -•/� •�i.,.._.�::-, _ ._.. ..__- Y �` 15. 37 241 as 21 • 34 u� �� �4.15. •,;•—- - �'>'. -� ��t i ,.i i 41 r rn ,„rl R ''etr' C ti GT.--_al95.f— ] 2��� RL _ _ _6i �47Lrs t ' 9.� .� real �N�re eS �1� S j •v• I SITE i [oS_�;�br'� �91oP _ r-- 72 •;�3- oFa`. }��,� , -� w a ,''dd�rZ •' —1�' ra,:sc >.. . t�;a�Ls.«; 3i �� � ; Q ; J. N (. y I ,,pr'I I 7r aP -J' 11 10 .9 �_ _� "1 I Q �CI L. :G =7..0 1 1 ,J4 s.��Q •, -e r L. LrP > r . 60/ I • al llAlO :JC = 1,, 1 ri_ � � � �' S w� ) f 16THsl 1 t 1 , l • i n I i l • I 1' I �. I , I . 411H1 -1 I �I i i ,JtY {:; ; ; ; i 111 1 —''1_ ' i ' f� DAY CARE, 1 ` '" {I I I I I` 1 'I I �, I,o`, . _L1 t I_ 1. l ' _L_� J__1 _J J__I-L Ju ' ' L_ OFFICE :a�� _�_� L_a ssr - �91 ,.> 4 ,,4- 4 �S- _p . y' Ill) .t a art._ _ i:-7�? li 1-4.�_ _ _mil\�� _ '-• n;.-.19'�.. _.-=1 r� I yc 'Ci'• fSl•• , .. C _ / • 1 t) I T 2�J I / ?� F —_ J 1- - • \ ..;a I 41_y, ss <_-_ _ 17__h_-=_ fib__;) ! ' It, • _ ��� Et. - ---- I ' ---.- __- Ttr, _ —., PARKING t3� . • . ',-; --r-Tit. , U\. -— -4-,5, 4,..;:. , I 1 . 1.eiqd.4 ., _ — '1 gle gir[44— —1__-_-__JVA21.___.1 >. -r \ - _ — —_ T-•I- -- ------ CO -- ---'.a�:--M'Pi---{ OFFICE 1 1 ; L1GlirINDUST�RI . a �,,� I � ] 1 riil/N4 28 r�`�/NJ U L�C� ici(4: t .3 r ..c I• 45 7 r Pt. J ia#..z, A ,,.„--.1._- _i:.Y__ _� I I I-405 FREEWAY SITE LIGHTING PROPOSED TRASH PROPOSED LANDSCAPED TOP. ENCLOSURE LOCATION WETPOND,STORAGE AREA EXISTING EMERGENT 411 56' - - WETLAND S e6'OB'4 W_- __ -- _ i IS 2 I' .._ '�� g � 22 o zz`p W ♦ a .04111 _ LANDSCTAPEElli n • I o CD• 3 • * -.� REA YP. I I > 1!i,1 sit, � W O I � , W F: x fz� > m= r cli • cc 12 .i, ♦ ' O,' ❑°_ll o gym. Is ' � ire•-v- 16- � - 'w. • `I- 4 A•FH.-. a `!' c Irv, /-' 0 •iJ 7 I=of .t• ,.;,�_. 'b._ tlf � �a /// NI '1. :'', 'g I � erR- u : I ARCHITECTURE • I ( I I I and PLANNING ROYCE A BERG.PF NC PAL • .y, kinsft..Iri ,074r z a I Y.KEN K.CHIN.PRINCIPAL 300380iH AVE SOUTHEAST ll !fi 5 �fIW , _®A� 1 TABULATION MERCER ISLAND.WA 48134 EXISTING BLDG. .\,\ ,0 1 a Alf '�I I�' Ip4133Ddd4e FAX Y3u664) ON ADJACENT PROPERTY I •'',1\ '�': Oar 6j LANDSCAPE AREA—® 1a"� `v 1 SITE AREA f126,876 S.F. I ';'/ (,: 1 &SCULPTURE GARDEN �r'�.���� �� c' .ii':,{; '--- �a};x.� � � � � NET SITE AREA ±95,255 S.F. :` T- GROSS BLDG.AREA I ,;. ' : '' �� ��� 1 i 4 FLOORS t70,827 S.F. 8�� Ii ' 1I I " , OFFICE(2,3&4) t53,553 S.F. ,' .ae� <LANDsc E AREA i--Li__ GARAGE(1ST) ±17,274 S.F. '( 1 -" I FAR W/O GARAGE 42%GROSS SITE : 'i ®� PROPOSED S10EWAL7c i if I NO DESCRIPTION DATE 1: OFFICE COVERAGE- 1'1 irR. ® ® LOCATION •-6':9' S69.NET SITE - I PRE-APP. 9-29-99 • 16-1---,, I TOTALKING ARAGE SITE RPARKING 137 STALLS REVISION No--z3-99 REVISION 11-02-99 ........_. 27-99 ."..............._......-.-.-._---`. ;:,; S''.._..................................... ._................_ - _ SUB-TOTALS 1 - I _...-_--.._..-._._.--..-_..--- , ;. , _ I SITE PLAN APP. 1T-20-99 0 0 �_" /._..............._\__ ,;�i p....._...._......... � _ .���•� .as 55 9 z20L(NCL.A2'SO.H.) 0 ;j ,A1 1 REVISION 12 0}99 COMPACT STALLS TOP LANDSCAPE AREA 8.5 X16 (30%MAX.) _______ 6 ACCESSIBLE STALLS -- ,1• ---'- I 'I'-' ,• NB9'2g 79'[at40t --—--—--—--—-- -- -- - (INCL.1 VAN STALL) �YL / �l 1 \ _ I 1 _ ___ _ 1/272 S.F.OFFICE �•' ., PROPOSED CURB CUTJ ' ` —+.:\ 3.68/1000 S.F.OFFICE EXISTING CURB CUT —MONUMENT EXISTING CURB EXISTING STREET `PROPOSED SIDEWALK 20'WIDE PORTION SIGN &GUTTER LIGHT,TYP. LOCATION OF VACATED THOMAS ST. SITE PLAN SW 18TH STREET g \\*** , \ EXISTING CURB CUT 0 m' .0• 00. to) File:99044/SITE-E6.DWG ,- JOB NO.: 09044 SHEET NO OF: t•=20' ' " DATE: 8-24-9B A i DRAWN: RAJ A-1 5'I SITE PLAN 20' 1 CHECK: , -I-405 FREEWAY SITE LIGHTING PROPOSED TRASH , PROPOSED LANDSCAPED TYP. ENCLOSURE LOCATION RETPOND,STORAGE AREA H EXISTING EMERGENT 411 66' -- - - ' 1111-11 WETLAND S 66'08'48'W_ __ _ ..._._........__..-. ...._....._. C C. 0 22 • � , ur/6 2 CI I iI .":: G eept ,$;- . _ DSCAPE n I ,\W I 3 • .\7 � y, �� S __ II -1- I W Fflj3 Z \ ` ,� B 1 . 0 l l O W U 24 2 /F 18 0' 20' ' 18. .I = W I U g ram,.-rl I \ ''$",�-F K „'6" +Hl y -ft. — n ■� 11t 0 _a I I vp�g�$ //J �ot- 0 is 4 6,Fie - iri r1.Oe'4 2119'-6" I < I.) H • �/(JJ//�)�v V 01 NI _ \# i 3'd ;4:TP�.,; : $ r3 ay �mT `E� 104. . s:'3k`=- q� r, U s 1 _ • t 4rMi : fl s ., X a f3` �yR li ems' vH 0imni.. L_ 'I� 0�` r NIA' I —�I -/ I .f>., t,"s�3` '� o1. �I}f�l�R r� cd I ECTURE LTANNNi - ue Y \ • Ftr S� �5� 3003 80TH AVE.SOUTHEAST ✓'.`" '� 4y " - - '?-, -IMP- : \ 0����� /�. — -- I YKENROYCEK CHRIN.PRINCIPAL ®♦ F,*"••4 ""3kinalli MERCER LSIANO.WA 98I34 �J _ I TABULATION E%ISTNC BIl)G. \ A�O ��'"" `•� - n I I -4- 1206143oddaB FA%23(Ldda) ON ADJACENT PROPERTY I 1 I / P \ ( LANDSCAPE AREA-1N !�o: / �- =-I I SITE AREA t126,876 S.F. J .- &SCULPTURE GARDEN - 395 256 S F {1i ,�, .. '� ��._.�}-rl�-# ��I L.' ,. S�'"% n I NET SITE AREA a �w��oo► e��� -1-1- —1-4 �� �� GROSS BLDG.AREA I i �� D. ��/ I 4 FLOORS t70,827 S.F. I �. i '/ �� 0 \ •'ON ,{••^ 000 **� P. I I OFFICE(2,3&4) t53,553 S.F. " 11 .I ^�:::.' 12.�1B.•Arr"//,- LANDS! E AREA _ I GARAGE(1ST) 317.274 S.F. c 1 / :h i _; ® SIDEWALKJ- I FARGARAGE 42%GROSS SITENO DESCRIPTION DATE OFFICE COVERAGE ��� ���PROPOSED W/O 1 l 1 I F:H. ® LOCATION -L__ I 56%NET SITE PRE-APP. 9-29-99 `!• "' . ' 's94. • " � TOTAL PARKING 197 STALLS REVISION 10-27-99 '® 6^'T I I I 11s 8 I SITE PARKING 166 STALLS REVISION 11-02-99 �� " { -�� ''' GARAGE PARKING 31 STALLS REVISION 11-23-99 I: _.------::_..::::::.......I_-_._::::.::;. ^,1',;,-^ 5..._ O Q,.e." '- : I D D I I I I SUB-TOTALS 13 REGULAR STALLS REVISION 12-03-99 I', _- .........- - .<, I I I I I 5 9'20'(INCL.2'O.H.) SITE PLAN APP. 12-20-99 ...-.__......_...... -.-..._.. .. ,, L'C' `Try i 6 COMPACT STALLS J 49 - -'- '_ - - - TYP.LANDSCAPE AREA 8.5'x16'(30%MAX.) • —__—__,r—__-__—__ �_—__—__�t__�_ __ __ _ 6 ACCESSIBLE STALLS N e9.2s 29 E a10 m .0 (INCL.1 VAN STALL) L I I 1/272 S F.OFFICE 1 / • 3.68/1000 S.F.OFFICE T n PROPOSED CURB CUT \ \\\ EXISTING CURB CUT -MONUMENT `E%ISTINC CURB EXISTING STREET `PROPOSED SIDEWALK 20'ME PORTION SIGN &GUTTER LIGHT,rfP, LOCATION OF VACATED THOMAS ST. SITE-PLAN SW 16TH STREET \i. EXISTING CURB CUT .31 0 10' xo' 40' Bo' " File:99044/SITE-E6.DWG , JOB NO.: RPM SHEET NO OF. n NIXTM DATE: 8-24-01 ADRAWN: RAJ A-i SITE PLAN 20' 1 CHECK: 1 • • • • LEGAL DESCRIPTION: i • ▪-•— �i PROVIDED BY FIRST AMERICAN TITLE • ' • COVER SHEETPARCEL'A'(ARTHUR S.NESS) (— 9 ° < m LOTS 1-6 AND LOTS 24-34,BLOCK 36 M C.D.HILLMAN'S EARLINGTON - H o SJ GARDENS ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SEATTLE,DIVISION NO 1, I CONING TO THE PLAT THEREOF,RECORDED IN VOLUME LT DF;' gW tOTM STREET -. PLATS,PAGE 74,RECORDS OF KING COUNTY,WASHINGTONI Vl TOGETHER WITH VACATED TNOMAS AVENUE SOUTHWEST 0113RD AVENUE ye T WAY SOUTH/ADJACENTTHERETO, I SW-4RM EXCEPT THE EAST 40ID FEET THEREOF,VACATED BY THE CRY OF RENTON ORDINANCE NUMBER 305) D_ EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR F la LI d ` PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO L BY DEED RECORDED UNDER O_ ' - m - — - RECORDING NUMBER 540.S.SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF KING, fD Z .--� STATE Di VASHDNGTON �— PARCEL�'(susAN N.MaEom r; m In LOTS 7-23,BLOCK 36 IN C.D.HILLMAN'S EARLINGTON GARDENS x,',•',.:•. Q o SW 16M SIaEET Ie ` ➢EITION TO THE CITY OF SEATTLE.DIVISb3N F'1,ACCORDING TO L 3 V THE PLAT THEREOF,RECORDED IN VOLUME IT OF PLATS:PAGE T4,' a W SITE § 0 20 40 o RECORDS OF KING COUNTY••VASHINGTONA , •, • e • • O Z i i_II•_ p-,el PRIMARY THAT POiT1IlN CONVEYED TO;THE STATE OF VASHWGTON FOR h[O V < 69,SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF KING, a RECORDING NUMBER 1WAY NO.1,BY DEED RECORDED UNDER STATE OF ON I± _ ------------- - • \ PARCELS'A'AND•p CONTAINING AN AREA Of 126,877 S0,FT.(2.91 m I�— ACRES),MORE OR LESS. Z • �q^�A, " c`-----! "•-••• '-' I 1 SgUHhCT TO ENCUMBRANCES OF RECORD,INCLU➢ING KING CNTY F a2jj T Y �____- III•' %�"' �`+ ++,I + !� L4+ I ECORDING NO 5/43609 AN➢KMG COUNTY RECORDING NO 7702160701. Q VICINITY MAPSIM • •• _-- fi I ALL• F�f11WSTTTIONE IN THE 24,TOVNSHRTH23SNORTH,RRPN E 1 EAST VnT KING TER • 0 D SCYE • 'i •VASHINGTON, Q • ,!l° t + 1`ij VERTICAL DATUM: — (t 10 + +,A + NAVD IMAM ELEVATION=24.157 �Iin ` \ Jai - u LEGEND: _ EXBLLLDWN ';'tYo ++\ ■+ • 'il: O BENCHMARK PROPOSED TYPE C CATCH DAMN 1111 - jar. Cr • + ` < Q OUNDCITY F3RDITON 1/2-BRASS Mg( N0.1861 o°E _ `III `' N U TOP OF EAST END OF BRIDGE CONC.RAILING ON NORTH ` I� Q SOE OF S.W.I6M ST.(BRIDGE IS LOCATED JUST [>:v'Ty i c PROPOSED 1YPE I CATCH MN II�II • O `,( __ i.' ~ +\�m````1 I WEST of INT.SW 16M ST.k OAKSOAL£AVE.SW) O o o 'E NEW OFFICE BUILDING 'I; •3 E.I .g - DunTHORNG TIPS D GICH G4N ® • Q + -1-!=\r: RHF LEVEL FirDA '1I CO SITE DATA W o F-I LT.3 do: mum TYPE I GTCH a.. ❑ • Q '• '� •�;; • 44/ -0 I —� W - Z co U R., - • Z r///i_ =a1+11`i y I I Z CO commercial office District g W co _ o€ PROPOsm STORM DVNNNCE uxE m 3 /�p44,► -0/I ' Nu,lnouN ary Nc M a •] Q 'E Uj 1 i;� .+s� �`�e> '7VV ria/.� II'._1 Q soot, oNcz O z ;u FKISfWG SNaIE ORNNGE UNE W '!•`\\(\liffiiiiwir,' ';;: .\\, L_ �' m wa;i lu w > 3 G 7) _ PROPOSED swmRr sLwm uwlwlE Z i,,/% I ■r N, M 4" gz,.s1 e W a _lE9 DIMENSIONU PROPOSED SADDAM,/SE1.CLEAN= � //•ri%�ii.," - -_ (} r/ it• I IG tlNTololArea2 9.0`gelO p_ QA�q „/''' /rl l E+°Vri lm Maua Sodom 02 et ¢ , —e— _- O U -;, � tt 71snn N 4° waewlovea area square reel U J B sosw6 suer seEW M,wxoa ., '-m--_------_ -f— -;— Lal b°non"er°aea 0 sb-s% e t -�_I_W I3 M I --ji0/)P»' �11 auu ninr,ll, TYPv - Troe v-1,r.svrmRlerea oo m ilPROPOSED SINOIRY SMR LWE Q • --�i rig;i•ii + ` i pPllu nlNc SMACKS/HEIGHT I IMrtFnnN4 N fi a ==� I III r _ rapose� fit Yara 60 feel �o feelMMinimum Required) WSIAeG WATEIEWN __.--._ I �___ =___}kP __.11-•`. �_ v�_ 1 P °see Building rYmE 65 feel I t InMum geqir n tiff r , III = , _ _____I____ e Yara 120 feet 0 teal Minimum Required P FOMO SMEARY SEA'm ONE • _ S'4 prove'ee sic --__ -- 'Y rma 40 feel 20 lest Nlnimum Requlretl) ——— aD lest zso feet Maximum Allowed)$—� MOON FIRE SORES $�\ • Proposed ilding Height •r fi�fi � _—_—_— 4 Bunq Sq.Foatvge By Floor q.FL _fi 10.040 WATER VALVE DQ — I _ — BUDtlin 5a Fvo[age verall Nc 59.FL W — — t�a:9°-Bul ga R St lures J 'k — P0OPolm WATERWM ___—__—_—_ ——— ————- TRIO Aspn4It Pavement gq cFt. F _ 9 PROPOSED ORE MOM. Y `SW 16th STREET pARKINf.gFJSIIRFMFNi4 8 II .wr'i3-rzyrr-i:::'t-„U•7-1,-•••Et, r,FFTiT;.•:i5s t�•.;y'":i:'_�5 ] • PROPOSED WA.VALVE N •+++r...a r-�:.._'*'TIT- , .:..,!Gad-�.... x .. - t NumEer of 5 aces Required P per unit:2 Per empaMme o "sioaa'rdlt Ri°sise Pr°'''d teat by 20 feel o g`g o § PROPOSED SPOT pEVA1pN5 • Comp ct Percenla9e Alio.ea 4 percent y 16 feet m R MSG SPOT ELEVATIONS P° Compact Percentage ProMtlatl -I percent IV @ g PDA Accessible Stalls 4 Y i A Aisle MiaM(Mtn) 24 het • il — 33 9 3 �NG CONTOURS --109-- LOcallan&Sze of cure.Cut 109.Ba•to Center of Driveway from South a oN N m 55 - Eastem Properly Comer.45 LF Curb Cut(I) n - i with 5•Landscaped Median. PROPOSED CONTOURS NOD INDEX OF SHEETS: I ANnu'APE RFOUIRFMFNT4 rn T j • OF 4 COVETI r 5.41 Buffer Along Street FrontageCI feet ''' '`.4";.' _ A Rear Yartl Lantlacvpin9 Raquirce 4 leel Slaef Yara LontlacoVing Raauirca 4 teat ,� �� a PRONGED PANIIEM Vy for ParWn9 Lot LondacaPin9 4 r .' a s ^f C2 OF 4 PR9-9uBJARY CIRADRKI APD STORM DRANAClE PLAN pin.uaa°Ecpe hlantl vdRi 4 I°eei m p v V N a ropoaetl Sq.FL of LandsmDin9 g tat Sa•Ft. C3 OF 4 PRad14dARY SANRARY SEWER AND WATEFMAN EXT@1910N PLAN Propos4a sq.FL 01 Lanasaaphg€v'+'ilmis°Hae�lat) sq.FL S Proposatl Sq.Ft of Lanescopin9 Total SR.FL \\ < PROPOSED mxaETE •• C4 OF 4 CONSTRUCTION NOTES AND PETALS ., p.K'"C,� y(D ii,° "Amy e • NOTE: THIS CONCEPTUAL THE SIZE PLAN ANNONJ N RY l ON•A PRELIMINARY I�- !' Q E_ It SURVEY PREPARED BY 1HE GAR COMPANY ON JANUARY IB.1999. CQAWCIOI DWI BE PMN0PTOWN.MOO FOR DBN DON DE W + �°.F E SUCIICR[� � • - 9 SE SDTE DERMINNT CONATM OVC KR RE.EN RED- AL [H6� Vj- • be 0 r s. IEpIApCNL...tY NRII.TLYN MAT MAY EE ERECTS BY canna of - ." v E%PIPES•I 101 I . eL Y.PURE*TO a MONO NORC NS NOT BE=ROM m A ¢rm wo wrsml.NIXON FCC mans TO Ira Noe ns W 1101 COME SEWN.AT ) -11� of CITY OF RENTON L§i n MORON STATE �rcPAanEAT v �� vnPYT-n.+E2wr OF PUBLIC WORKS M TIE=CNC=SAVL FE ROE EEC VD..OE NGTuI DMwSDA Ain INwH COVER SHEET O ONO 6L MN. T"S.EM 1010D@L Na MOM 1 THESE° 4 OR DCP 101 PI. aRMILICCON Z ¢rwA ONO IC,DN onsa-TIED ISLITY LOCO W,-boo-4u-sm RED T.PODS. . MOWN OF ND MOO COMM m NESCALLY m UPN mruTw OF COIMTRUCO N RL NAmns CCS.M0 RE...G NM BOO OR NOT COMMIS OE:r,LOCMICIM Cf SS ORES AS SOON ON TOEµNM O PR 1.11D SHILL OE(EPOS EN A ROZOTL® O ON ,R➢E YOST AN .TIE WOWS D NEM NO n DM NO RE SUBJECT M WOO. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 11 E DR COW OF TIE CORRECTOR.ERNS M DOR RM.TINS W CORMS WOW IN COMULTOR SMLL ONO.INNOSEN , Eu din 12/11.1 - 7 y PROM=RO F°R REPIA oR °f SS WANDEL,Dl DO Alm BE THE SNOM,D, D.NC.TO OWE ALL PROBLEM POOR M BmmmNO mx 1-800-424-5555 ro xwADl m .rn. Gre AAnosfl w' BaaIL_°„4 LLI 2 $ DP=T CI a 4 m • „, „""""r ,,, ..� m PPP—SS-TTTT, • • �� m A CITY OF SANITARY SEWER wu milkAND WATERMAIN EXTENSION PLAN e RENTON • ue ae.� wN � .. :® Planning/Builtling/Public WOMa tr010 vm o Gregg Zimmerman P E..Atlminislmbr NO. REVISION BY DATE APPR ..v...,” CRB . TE A : I W. � ° I •• IR s, k ; .II , //o , camxc aw�nwc I t q illllllll . I F. a IIII / _>/ R K I I. -:-,, i ,11 1 1 o / o v ° sor•1 r57w 297.68''° sa,. °'o/ I I 11 II 1 Qi 1• I '. . _ _J _• ________ 'I' g 1 III 11 ' m _ '- ;- I 1 NI i (' = ----.— — I III \ ,2 Q 1 .1 I 11 1I 1 i i,., . __ I I t I 'w ----- —% I. 1111111 \1 a$ a ' 1I IIII. �, o I I, I I k '1', ' , Wit;r„, "`,, i',,,, ,°° 111111 \ _: _ I I <:: / II I 111 z.S. II` 1• • \ . II b ' - i �--- ., g-.z� i,°Ir, I . I/ /m9 i; ,de;-- - ,:*, _y ,f/ ,\ OP',' -' ‘: \‘\ � ; I 11 1- 111 !,-_&:, _\ �'t',,,,, o�-` i III - 1 • i i' 1 i� , -,V ''1 \ '`� =-/"row og \ I°Q' _0 •i2°P- I 'i iiI s.•'`\- e IitiI 'il r W \ \ .'`':�a;\\_1i I I 1 D OZ 1. �s— r o k P I1 I ! E I I1 ,1I II I .\ \ 11 \ ' > L\ _ _ \ I\ \ Irno1I: , a l -0 \ \ DJ .rs 1: '•'A. .I I C� o. �, I \isl ���\ S�� . lyr. '' �'s; �� I ' b III Z . II ".• a Kytr Iil. I II „ I `\I c `qc c arc '4' , yi �1 , I '' I°III X I C �II•i•�� , `I _ roar e'of w• I , I I rn . Im R Q. ,I E I ttz,Pe•a,.w -_-_ � __� � �� � J' 11 IZ. E Fb. -1�ro !_o. / — `— 1 LVJ .,:r...f I, 11 .111, .- -----1.§ 1 :,„, ,,/ \ I-, ' A.,i i I . 1 3, x`I RII 1 . " z I \ w � m C c _________iy�_ll- ' / '4i � II" `11 D I "gym I 1 J �.°v - - -_- _---� ° (e$�'6v �—� m1 11 I Al;I I, _j - s ,f ,° , 1I E II 1 - - r1 • - •�' II a�,11 • I II 'a °4'� • o NO1'13296 321.41 t 01 t,lG o� — JPb 1 • 1/ ' ''y aE _ 0O , 11 , _ ._ m Xcn ° MR m cm F{q TITLES LOCATION. O�1 0 Z V J�(s�`Z KENTS WA 98032AVENUE SOUTH J I R DEVELOPMENT 900 BLOCK OF S.W.16TH STREET £ n< 47`i� (425)251-6222 2000- 24th AVENUE NE B103 RENTON,WASHINGTON x 1 (425)251-8782 FAX SOUTH 405 PLACE e S m s BEtILEVUE,WA, 98005 LL Z CNIL ENGINEERING,LAND PUNNING, A X `.,NO EN04.-- SURVEYING,ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES , 9. B.C.E.JOB NO. 7301 1,0 P\SOSRPROd\230,\ExewEERICGvlm PSWI02e oa,e/r"e I:/w,99s`,a s xme i=2o e,a,..,e1, mo,-,.znoI-e.nSNI _TREE CUTTING / LAND CLEARING PLAN 14-_ __ I �- �r --- -__12-7.-\ ao-----____--.--- x -X A. s.-o soo 1J oo I:.o le s9ilj Z d \� .11.1.2j I -1s 'A$=-X 5 40 •15 T - / - 6 J5 .,d3.-- O Qw d z ----=00=-== •-__\- -.-, t04.0500 %1530 • 5.90 ' / / LIM U• a •6 :Ds.a<• I aa0. 1•-20' m z _r-. �F • 179069• . 10 :`. .+//re/ raM \6.00 IB\ // '9 00�� ® e I(1 \ •4 ��3. /16 TREE-cF1��T`F-11NG/LAND CLEARING NOTESl6.Go O y �o • CO \ \•1• //I )0 / fDRESIFD LWOW` RFD NOEH.MACE CORO O 656 Q, 2 .� B E. \,800 i". •15I° •b / 3. // •0 JI500 / ° �� EOM.IX50NC WOUND \ 12 {IJ:\ Q18.2`d \ OZ aZ 33 --------------•-�`�°'' <lr.- ;I I / ��,wl� ,�EA„�[ op \ o J 62 � (Ytx�' J y \ I / �/ /ti••°i 1500 ] SCRUB/SNRUB CJNIIPJ RED DOalloOD,SNOWBFARY.SP�pFA PACIFIC wLLOVl,ORE 0.5N \.) I V JJ / f is./il:G. 3 0 s oo O HERMSSOJIWANoPW1'''\ REED CV ARTGRASs.CREEPING BUTTERCUP,SGiIEItEDSEDGE Ifi 00�]00 'Jsa \ 6 00 , lJJ0 I / .,,V '° ,6.00NNE GWOPY 1 6 SY4AYAN�BIACNBERM.MORNING GIORI't5.6 / ]0 00 •rtG161%J !IJ }ZJ9 \\ - Z m•la B.Co I971.0o/Is oo i]b'"',•P\ IOle •eg /� 1600 Vim- QI)i6 \1leoD o I 88 rk I 15.001 -O9;I1 . . I %� / �.,5 \ ---(5-i0,- B Q1 i / ®' 600 0 \ r, O'J O,]}J 29 01735 I / U w ;� .//, 5.00 lib DD 6 / /,5 o4^I6o \ \ 9Qt)65 I 2; I / 9 • J ' I / I I V•</ , ,°'OBI / 6DD / I \ ` " 1@�IJ00.DD \,e oo / G Z I / I;•C"'A�I // ° /,i00 •.1 { \16.00 \ tY((�/ :t2.00 n \ •162E 0 I / II• -- L§.° / °/Di500 \ „01698 '0, V163 I \ / /// / I 7% / 001590 .15.90 / /-w° \ \ 6' Z \ I sq,wz oc CO at5•i80o I,J oo I160d 15: I,400(Y•n5k�' gFgmy U.118 // >o0/ \\ \JZBJ/ O,UO]0 l I \ Y p0 3'g z I I \ \ � 60 /-l.ao / //01O 'O1s90 I 11800 00 e >-•z =S N N I SOO .0, / • .�"0 / \ �/ 9'- \,6.00 •If 88 I \ a1EW 0 to O Hw yu W m , \ \ \_ � )�'E) . / \ fi -1V//®11 t664 OO \t]OCD \ I W Lu Z coO UQi o€ \ \\ \ ,Fy.• / \ O I OB .1'� .1550 /,b 00 O O'1 \\U \16°0 I O Z Q Y-, l \ ° - \\ \ \\6� %5G1629 11600 5;'0.\ �I,°9 6 6Da ��°9,];_,JJ�IEGD II > a W <91 a \ \.,.GD\ / \ �?. / / I w r 6-0 \ ' 00 0o rn o Q \ �(1600 / O� 0, / V J a�a •--� - \\\ \ 10-QJ • 0.19/ / \I / I] / 8 JI 19 Oo CC N J G 1; 3 \800\ \\ / / // Or. 02 I •16 B3 i,/ 0 i I -� CO O ']] \ \ o 06 r0C9 - - • z00 669 OI}`5 / a o e2 N_ -__ ,82f .\820 \ I / 9a o 5J5/ Q 6 //� �1mIJ \\00 • 1 I I N \i).00 I O. /• 5 ,Ot`�15",95 Q1465� •14 a° �ti 3 / 1500 `)1600 )1]W 1]®, \ 10 /]0G 1].39`I 0 18 1923 6.0O /iy ll z 611-' a I 0 / (tea M:„3 __ _- \ I iR� 1D.Q 65 /�Q,i 80 Dt3 is 12' • va13.3�5.00 / (/ \\ y) u 61 I f'a 00 / J - V \1 ,f,J oat t6 tb6015.426 / ��v,29 e. 04.E 6�06// �//�6,00 a 9 )Qt].60 \y-Q1�o0 . I II /T&. a IA / / 6 11' S0 lo•106010 �,5 Vl,1J. I:.•:I17.00 I ._ION--_ - �n • . IBM I / / Q5.54 /1 77VV 01762 B B /. Bi��z W 014�1,0g�13m 2' /J,.. /° // D,e 22 .n.ez0le of _).�nl On3z ° 01�9n0o .: '1e 0o l\s 4D�aD°=�� _._ 5 @ gg'`t 16 I / / • r V; C i.ilfas '03.J9 0!if.83 / aye ro Ono¢ `.* O22 J rneazl �a \�1 d 6 i z x / 0`- ..0 'Ol�.iP °C/Fs9 / / ``,i0 OI)i 88 al'. OI3.501.1a o��o I,eoo j19°D ���� / \e z c E�••,1sOd+ 9C,��a.37a/"-•.,}9s / (yyy§ .,�') s )•O O1Me6O,*1sa 0,g24 .Dn.n '19e \\ t"s9'Do : g . �,B iO I I��. '`5.96 ° ]0 \/•t489 ��j 1 1f .00 / •"-00 \ O'19 26 e0 i' „.0 0I'f,}] 6QIJOY.50 800\0 rn m m g \0 5 3 15:0 /�'.�x6 }6I 14 330 \ \ 6.Q1].' Q101,to I \}II ^3 N ul 1.10\ °0 \6�]0,4.T ' ' 0184\ \ fi 0N3t59 -' -l'800 \ Zl a \ I \ N. • b i.4 I 9 14.5E cr" 9 B ,.018Is 0,s.59e. Di].35 N to \ w< •19.,0 \ \ 1i 85 4 00{y)13.�i.30 01}v 9� 0,61 \ 01]9¢ 01].]6 01r`,J©I]42 'I'Vs•�3,] ®0 J .,8]6 �\ x`." c�i� \\ Mr fi611 �6y�• 14 4J \ 96\ 0,]90 "I 01]©IJ tJ Oo ' • �J14.9] ((-����yy 5 669(1,62 M. 00].62 �">01 I \ J 6 1 D1a.76 O14 I 5 o S.J, 0®1' 1&' 5 Dt]. 01NSr VAs ,vats_ IX CB a8_.- [ x V M•. \ (��s�ya O' �3 0 .63 O' D3 z4 E7 `'1•,N.M I, 0 .-_.-__-.-__-19.6J \ \�f8' oD..:$O'S1 -- (ili VOo 15�1 J.. -"00 �_-6- I' --_ 0�--�� .3BO0_ IEn150]24' E6 i� J 9.6E R ,-E2-OSL �- CM.i,,. ..-_ 00 0 -9- --- .300 --M Y-21.3 ... . 65E-t2• --2BP& (t • 9 559(2°•Ew) ,.a.-.---"" fi: _ • - • �al.aS.. .- .... a'_�"�-- -iclsa. s `L` !'�'s _��l 9 21�i-• -.T. _-• •21`.M- fY z°.'- , �•. -'• �)��� .t'_24'7' '6.6. Y_ -'57. � 1 Y3C S '`.1:c FCI:,* S. i II \ _ -,_______.__-e.. _ -� •�..,_���.. - a jf� F�F%SCUR , '�ON.II CMt �b8 el. �&Z fD __ �I�,�.`� IX._2°�sD y s.SIUN/ « __ c0�00a` '. J N CO / r� --- eV -_ IX.5@EEf UGHf E .1 �E16 CURB ] I ` STREET 11C,rt IE=6.56 24'W)) xPIRES 13 FA MEET 1Mi12 IE.Ix♦ ,E_,/ __ IX�S SY WNi -,�P68- -2133-- IE.6.58 16�I"20 -V- --ay...C s • ce --z1�, -z,:19-_ .r Za'sI .�I� II - _ CITY OF RENTON cz -z1-sz- - - - - ''y - - - - - ' - - . - ,5 - „ 'Iii zao oera NT OF PUBLIC WORIcs n • ts.e 109E ¢ J n• .4 3 2t ey... , 2 G5 IX.G.11NE'2 2t IX.CURB -----------1 ' •,:. --- --- -•----•----•---- -- TREE CUTTING PLAN .I, O 16th STR��T • ---•/---•-- i • ?13i.• -______-___.`R!.46:__. ..:?-_N-i-ram• i5-r---..4DEWRIX': __...__..z__:',;�TS2r-.__-_.��..•�••_•_--YtYS...--_.. y0A':: __ _-__ __ _ - _ _ -•Wre t2 B BB new . -�'.:=. a 32r3 2�1t tee" .__ ..�, 1.� .:..:... .. ,a....� fll COGC.5®twLlt _, 1 - '.:'.''. , .. ?j00,�.r:,-'.:y1f-.'`'-f_.PYsf.• _ -- /09103•92 NM O� ocnm ➢J- Bcua 1•.20' rauwur_Na6_ U ._... -.PaI-::.c:._-..._�._ zGeg'-- ..._ - w lE.mv n um Lures s..,ee W •u,3 : 1 1p 1 m Rim 9.\SDSxmouv}01\ENGINEERING\J301-K9010 ozwr••r 12/22/1999 0722 Scale 1.0 Nathan/Vela 26682-2..26882-5, • • _____ __ __ TREE CUTTING / L_A_ND CLEARING PLAN ____ q 0 �_ l--- ____----- s_D 6DD I —�— -- 12—��I I ' ilj x .,5" ��^ ,6 sq6 s .,s O d \ .n:J mix x413.56-«- -Ism - w d (7 ---.-`ao=------_\ `--5� r — -9@A@'w�590 I / I F 0 d Z _ ,41.4°s.00 I5}o I /' 1-20• Erp Z c q¢6947 / /8.00 6 A \, ;/ �' OOP}0 0 10 200 4 I Ja \ \�° ° �/ / z, / 9a TREE �17 / RING NOTES\I6Do 60 -,800 LL 3 O \ woo D \g1 dy}•, �' 16. I \ p,fisa i B''410110 • 8 O \le^o \ / , '/ zo t - / PROPOSED NG D CLEARING Nc IMMO WLNND . / tr.•// /la•0 ,S Oa / �� EA EXCLUDING ,z \ z� \ �nn0 .1B Zq, 0001NN}--��PY\EEE i a (7Y[�O05 J I l I l 11` /J Ila..a 10/500 % NPRUFSED W`'o�spy RED P1DFR BUCK COiIONXD00.PACIFIC YELLOW.ORE 6A5 \\ 017.E2 1)6° V ZBjf / HERB+LCOISSaCANO REED W4RYLRA55,CREEED DOGWOOD. PING BUTTERCUP,SGLIFAEO SEDLFS ,g 800 ,g 9' J IE O ' 1 I / /� ,(A {/<1�`y1a I �4;,00 5 NNE...." \E xlue�'inflUusi"'Bls1°D,:ICYBmRr.uoso GLOW Is 26. ( 9-0.p,,7$)'77 17 }i}5 �\ z om 18'a 800 it)MIOOi 1600I 15.001'•�.]yl •�,2„,,' _: /°,: 0C ' ' y ;16.. /'�,o D,l.o* 601946 'Ito°0 fiT0 ! 0 8 I °'1 / •t9°D g 600 DJ I rt 8p,]39p,)}) Q)a5 I U - w 1 I Ir••// / - /lE oo 6 / so4a e] pnEs g I 1 O • +�'�r /'/ ,:Old �V 6. /' 1 II II 6 2�"V1��9°.D° I1600 J / f •-.\ ' VIII �1 •15)a I/ I I ` �rznD � za \ •1846 ..`. Z / I Ili•• ` 9� /'p,e f s. •1aL 600 \ , -17.00 fi I \ I•1826 / I I / li'2go � / } d 5 I I / / Ii• /l ••,590 ••1590 / /1500 \ 6� p ' \ I $6 I / ' wz �^ m es,,e0° I,).°° I,6DDl,5 �la.D°Iv,,, la,. °° a.� // ,e / \\\ \\2,De� o p,�]D • II \\ I �, q F:= I I \ / /+ 1\D / /Oro 'O,^9° \ �1a0D BI5390D o ›.z n F N I I \ �-ti 0. ' p.p // D / / .../ \t6of •le 68 I I \ I E In �W w ' \ \ '�__-I 5 / \\ oe '�� ®12 V Ea �� \,)DDo \\ w Z CO �a € \ \ \ / o.,5D9,, .,r95 :1a. �,6DD oo; \ °D I E 611 iiO o \\ \\ \\600 / \\,6D0 %O.; JI1O09 ' E06 \h9p173•_,;I800 II W 3 a ®11 c H to \ \.t).00\ ,510 16001529 / %e \ ,�0 �' / 1 / 18 I L m _Q __ \ \ \ ,,9116,09Er9 / 9 o0 / Q\ Oi f�o° 1 / W Q N J a ®$ - \ \ \ wVJ / j pI I - / Z n.i�yw —tl W Si .5 \e.00\ \ / / . / O I — .16 e2 5` /' >i I oo m 7�Iry \Ifi zO\\ I / I / O Bt a_° O6 I oD 1Ti6 (-I`00�`�--T� iS.o\\)00 •1669 01.'9 / < 1 I N x 18.2( .5 cE ,).00 116 / •/" 59a 'p ,y°Y 1485• i.908 / .00 )1)00,] 'O ,I)001)}3�1Y� 823 -t, ii, I I is 20 /p / ; ' bpi°}a / t5 / Q.o ®]' \\ ,2 Oa z1 OJ la I L SACg1 -�—_ \\\ I I ,•Y55p6 ,O•Y565 /ipla gOpla a5O,461 6n�1583.�5,°0 / / \� 92 10 61 I ,800 jI _l d .,apAe.oa n.oc{,6.maba,s a2 7/ "_6 0,i `L� ,d ,- 6 ,5 'pn6o \),,oc,(:I n°o i _79---Jj s+-:::::- I / B' S / / pl).62 ,B.no / QSsaOl pl$2, x / 5.00 i:b i ps.2z ,naz0•s0, i�).], Oe 32 ,p.&,,„,° y 116 oog�19.pa,ga11 g p o I / / c�}°�h� 9•1 s ` .]9 O!4as8} / 9"a.gR B' pn.<B \ O'fi..\+ o02I \\ .,=fii H � i G s / t{' ° Q°o 'p1 �°p�2 / / (�7,,6 03.6e pid`2o 0?3,Sv),6 01),] 22 I lso° j 19.00 2^��� r 1e \sss•j.1s� sG�+�� /-�,}9s / � S� I.O 1P66 +i'se O,§:a 6 \ (19o°g = oNm ,sLI CA .-,au , SO ,g/c19. �° s ,o ° l\'• .eq r y' 1f / ®'§ \ 0,626 o O' 0' ,;Ole,-1 ep) , 6'. \ \q0 m .,850 1\ \p�'5.]6 ,}O15 a0\yp1 �`2�'}6I 1a 00 �]ry,/,396 ply\\ \\ ] 6. 6.Q,).a3 p1�3> O13t58 p�SD r , --��1800 5... '�3 of N 3 sq o 0 I 8QQ1a.56j I7'" 8\\ g• 01815 p1858 9 01]}5 z„a ). -7, \ mwy wi \ 6[p\w6soau.au}o •Oi�95 •� pl]9s B )° 6\ pnso i ' '01 0,) 17 +16.)6 •90 s o 'p. i°' 16. On�ez6, 0 � R � , y� � 5.. a i5)1 —)-- mee ---W.} I 9_4`..._'. ,! J�'�.SO tt67 `M \ _- - - • F'SS:OMAL CN, b' OnNBO 3 4\ _v__><___._._ y-- IX.2a SD v J• 6 T CURB•R `IX.CURB T�•_q 2a SD_ Y IX CO LLL STREET IKM —__ RAI-B.13 _ IX STR EXP."iu=z0.) , 2�.w) 90-— —— LOW I IX tl s IX STREET UONT IE-14.4(24- ��Y19- IX_�z51HEEf WHi �h6� —lE$'�8 £}-20. l - re ---KW- �,..� .a- - _ _ 1E=).m%1'> -- oEPA CITY OF RENTON n _ _ _ _ --o III. •-IX�e EiiMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 11 __ _ _ EX G.LINE'2_0 . 2'25 2'61 2'!f j - _ a91 v TREE CUTTING LAND CLEARING O E�'G�uNE IX.CURB SW 16th STREET . -,,6__.____.___-._IX 12•w_ __ R Z uTE t2 a 99 nEw -_.�_-.. .-.='t,6-z.----;--. .�_31-ir>._•.�-____•___'__:--,�:R*;M a, -_ _-_ __-_. .. . -z+3 z�la y _ __._._._.._ - -.- w ,e.,aut .. er u,n wre A'^o.'® o...�a.�..e,e2° ran m 21 // rz'#:- - -21a6--__ _ _- _ • comas, Else— RD.__e.¢_ LLI i 22t3 effr � a t O Re-P:\SDS[PR0.1\)301\ENGINEERING\]]0,-x20WG Dote/Pmm.12/22/1999 07:22 Scale 1-20 Natnan Pre. 56682-T,26682-5. DARK TIMED PAINTED r MECHANICAL INSULATED GLASS DRYNT / ROOF SCREEN GLASS,TAP. FACIA I ow w F7 1 .1-, 1Ll u1 . to ai ���� PM MP w w w 4 CONCRETE TILT —POLISHED ENTRY —ARCHITECTURAL LIJ n��-1� TEXTURED PAINT FACIA LIGHTS W �.I I 2 SOUTH ELEVATION = w U • 5 co 2 0 1 = U0g, z O �,- I I I I - Ponce ,'' 1`l1 1 FTF y�1/rIIy�� ARCHITECTURE 4 1 aN\ice , ',` :. �` ;_a A TO nam and PLANNING 1 tom: ..1U ROYCE A.BERG.PRINCIPAL Y.KEN K.CHIN,PRINCIPAL • 3003 BOTH AVE.SOUTHEAST MERCER ISLAND,WA 98136 WEST ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION 12061230-6646 FAX 3313660 .0 NO DESCRIPTION DATE PRELIMINARY II-02-99 L SITE PLAN APP. 12-20-99 .......I t /� o Ammo _� �� Isr, ELEVATIONS_ �� I � ! 11 ilikN 11�- 11 �1 �11� •iII 11 �1 ■mnl lll=nn�n1\liiinn n12 ewa - EXIT EXIT EXIT PARKING GARAGE 19. STAIR STAIR ENTRY ER NORTH ELEVATION File:99044/ELEV6.DWG 1 JOB NO.• RYON SHEET NO OF: DATE: 8-24-91 DRAWN: RAJ ANY ELEVATIONS 1/16' 1 CHECK: • / 196' / ' / 21 35 30' 30' 30. I 30. 20 / . s Q1II l ' CJ R ,, POSSIBLE FUTURE Z it CORRIDOR LU „^ VI a .,III ,q — q W II`[O7((1/1 w H Z i T:l - o w 0 �� I- __ 0 w 1� a ,/� 6,i, n 3RD FLOOR > CO? Q ass GROSS AREA 417,039 SF 0 y / CORE AREA 42.067.4 SF =Q i� \-m1R r n EFF. 487.87. Q r}� Y ' Z p z 0 �O� 0 O 0 a2 3RD_ELOOELILAN -1L16•, 1 1 1 GA nd C RHPILANNTECT IUNRGE ROYCEA BERG,PRINCIPAL 196' R CwN.PRINCIPA4 / , 3003 80TH,..SOUTHEAST 21' 35' 30' 30' 30' 30' 20' MERCER ISLAND.WA 9BI3a / A' X f IpdIR30.66a8 FA%130664] 1 1 1 1 —_ ' 1 I_—_ I ---III I_ 11 I . \ i N NO DESCRIPTION DATE ' _ PRELIMINARY 11-02-99 -� . SITE PLAN APP. 12-20-99 1-g 1 I___� J . . . POSSIBLE FUTURE . N CORRIDOR o 'a — �m W /1 - - - ,iI1/1 ' - - __ . .--- 41H FlOOR FLOOR_PLANS GROSS AREA 418,993 SF CORE AREA 42,067.4 SF I / R EFF. 4891% P FIIe:99044/405-BLDD-6.DWA liJOB NO.: 89044 SHEET NO: e DATE: 12-13-99 Q A DRAWN: RAJ Pi A-0 4TH FLOOR PLAN 1/16• 2 CHECK: / 195' I' • 21' • 35' JO' 70' If 30' 30' , 20' -/ . , • Rill F .,I. 23' 1i_ I K, _ _Iii___,°.' I _ _ _ _ lel Q 1- 1:14 , / 15. / . Il2. 1LT •2oSR /44 m L W B // it C L xweE�N 1ST Fl -GARAGEL'i ~ C _ _ CROSS AREA 417,274.3 SF W I- se s _ CORE AREA 4747 SF` x C7 r STORAGE AREAS 41,0005E U L C L .._ \., �'/ ,� 30 STALLS 0 ~? ii (INCLUDES 1 ACCESSIBLE STALL) 2' 0 • x Q -' 1204 � CC CO 1 a CO \ \ z• 0 oo x• 0z GARAGE—LEVELS 1S_T_ELOOR_PLAN-1L16'I__ I ARCHITECTURE A d PLANNING ROYCE A BERG.PRINCIPAL P 196' �R Y.KEN K.CHIN.PRINCIPAL 3003 EOM AVE.SOUTHEAST • 35'21' 30' 30' 30. 30' 20' MERCER ISLAND,WA 9813e I '1T T r '1f 1206123D6e 69 FAX no-6w • \ \ a•ti 1 r. 74 NO DESCRIPTION DATE • PRELIMINARY 11-02-99 N %� . e •. a o • I-- SITE PLAN APP. 12-20-99 —�' MI CORRIDOR POSSIBLE FUTURE CORRIDOR } 1_I!�rr q _ a n -I' - ►ow r = FLOOR PLANS• yND Fl OOR • CROSS AREA 417,521 SF • CORE AREA 43,035 SF I. P N ' File:99044/405-BLDG-6.OWG d` i ' JOB NO.: BBON SHEET NO: DATE: 12-tl-09. DRAWN: RAJ A-" 2ND FLOOR PLAN 1/16' 2 CHECK: • c """ r , ' = l .r, F s , ml \ '; -_ t. . ' ;'"'.,___-".,_-- ___I-' 1 o t • J. '\\ -\. ... • --Lp-Na�w''"�i'a'''�-�s..-.I'-RACE----TRICK-_-- - _-E \1 /�/// o " . Ir gp�v,ogniN 4,1lEY CWB U J 1`\1 I 1 i ','METRO SEtyAGE'TREATME0\,.PLANT 0,-. RES RACE, TRACK; 1 - .n °Q I ,ti I I Y -- r�- JOCM1EY• 111, CLUB I � /•P ems_. -If - ____..__._--...-_.._ _, _---.�— • iNINGTON I f - \ ' lJ,(f y \ --___ 1 .t. _ .-- I`-� A;_- 3-3vasN' I 1 0.0 0 , _‘:,',,,,,c5it. . cia,:' ',':::lis,,I, • ,..A..,- - . 1 � C- ,-r } .........w....do II I : , g uQQQ[IILJBBBQ_ �+ �, I z _ y AVE � ' !•l ..... --J- . A - ill ,' ." ro I. . _ ,_.„,.1=to .7.1 * „..ti;,‘,,,„', :411 ..:- i--,, -- ---1 rn '';* h� f15.;-1N1� �3 C1 u ...AL,r#mow soli, fir ' a /' `•, Iv', r_ ,e �� POWELL AVE. It-Wr / A'c.a.•o' v''•, � `t=� �' �\ AffLl D GTONg 1.::: o f- �—', _ 44 \ THOMAS, :O . c d'Ot'17 o y `7 i` PARK ' w� - ..11 .0�¢.I"_� �v !I:�c Iltll �- CS] rrare ..,. ® ,al IiF{�•4Y".x:j:jial �. Iu11-I,'i ''Ir�l a...iikiF,'.,■ c _ q', THOMAS AVE. • i,:sljt'IH FE it*A• bl"'&TV.It tliglete B1 hT �iF ' c -- N ` ;I R;C , . , . , � , , 1 • I 3y --we, ��� 410 EARLINGTON •`INDUST �. 1 I I '`Ia7,- 11 fir+ • _:1�.� 1 I L.,iLu�L11J.L.Ii Li111 4 i ' u},F'il �\-7'tq.�:{'f1 �. I. COIL C4 : .. :)_ ii , i r,, 1 -0 — .3. I k O'A FAY ' F N� co _-1: ...,_ ,i.;,I . . =1 1 ,:',?, 't ‘,„,.iiii ,s., I .0- ..1.,_.. 41,,, _ - z z, t * I - Vic. ,.,a-• S£N.••1 AVE. i S.W F i r .''inlk.N.A. " . . `d°� - , 7,,,,,,.: .,,..... A.'4 ' ----""-- , r. 4 Ilia.\AS51• ,® c� Z ...u•* ,.. " ` LI ND- 9 -E AV . ___ N 2 I I Clik d1 ;kR�I.kt: :: ?E• g "� [i-r. . • N tr, .'.tirl'3,N� .,.1: Ks•. I +6 I _OIE 6114.' ri p \ t I E MAPLE ,/ ,' AVE. [S.W. ,_3 w'� -t_�a v l.T- ..I i era z vlialr_ .® �.3 1 -y,`�Ylf-'. =a n - i II _. , . ; , ; , ,, ;t, !„.„ , ;,,; , ,: •••,. ; ;.:,.„ . • ,,,., „,,,...,, . „. .: ____, „ rsi,,: 1, I.,.,..„0,,,,,. .i.,.,.,,,, ,;,, _ „ . .. ,, , , ......„, ,.. . w4;...; , ,,I, ,..,. . . . , . ,.. __,•, ,•, , , ,•, , . , ..; TT; ; • „ , , , „ H . , , ,; _ , ,i., , ,,: r; , - v • ‘ •la \ •r,, a,1-1 :,,,-t -• 4,•_ • 8 M p cMK a r° -. a .. ' —- ROttz ./oT: + - _ o. •. T :: :'... AVER .�"c':'- �__. --._.I✓uGLtS".FREEWA:J '. \ ��, I�T�IL�� ` r=i D D m• C O a� x 5 . o Z' z m ��E`o oD JOHN C. RADOVICH DEVELOPMENT CO. \\'/(7 1' � n > ,x X c"' D v $ y- z o A Z-�i _ 900 SW 16TH STREET s m=;7) =A RENTON, WASHINGTON 1 g EEo� c m 53 e 1 -rq ;ACREf-i"'R,17CE'"-•Tl ACX...-- - o 1` 1 -,-'..�1 a • t '�► pi�N .IOL1l 5 uu 7� I'"• :;t I 1� I 11 fl ,\ i - '.'NE.TRD 5EWAGE"'TREATMEN e PUNT-- - RES RACE; TRACA1 j • i•� I ;g' /�\ :� IC •aMGTd JOCKEY 0, CLUB 1 i ''11 . -1 '11� \ , - - - - - -- - ' I,-J. --------- I 1 11 r ,1 s \\1 , - - -- $ 11 z \tS� =mom' / _ !fir _ i `! e yi H 0 DoE LS `.ISQLSU_]B`_ r•.•r N •,, ®\� . ' - _- . ..,me , . •- ,,„, 0, QQ KIU I' BBQQ °° �-• :„D-I' • -"lc,- 0 e ° ° ° ULTUDIR1=1EUEEDL - --1--%7"-. t. lia'- k 0* "•;''''..,‘• E 'T ..z 1 i E' =C). M fin. r. w. a I '�T7 ra m :ett�1 .l� m •' - r .aus L_ru•..�.. PACIFIC • . i ! t t P.t T. ' �: 4Q.� -'s1 =0` lit POWELL AVE. r- L ' i .rpm a 1111 �3 '^ • . • .. ..,.f-e n,, 'i . -' _ v 2 to i r'r---. I,-i,,-! #0�^\ I`:.;g4 ff A R L I I, G T C i.-'. t 1 .i) .I.1!.u!.:I tcp al t iCFRt 6. _LIN :+ r- -1 • D,, - - _. ._._. .. _.__.'i.. q� YR s' I I t' a ��t,''- E }..0 t � . vry_� L !� Oill . a-P'rd�-�,a it g PAR K.y •o0.elYie Cjrailt y6in!Y !I!nry!m4•olniai• t r`..r�. O.I. 31%...1....1. .�QQ;,,,,I.1- -,.,, . t Y.�, TNOMAS A4 x6 ii mte•n1e!e .i..'�A, r?steAml• s!Y -r " - c 1 c. ...�,• g.s I .k.li iifi `t0i'' �tl 'a�`-_'il! .. tS- lilt EARLINGTON • INDI 1. IR II�r X t E Z, I 1 }m" 1 . l T.:-' Vli y iiii't . ;1 : I. • t.titcp4rlI,gi.l z �°._ ¶ 1! Z T . i` SEN..•' AVE. SW • — y -n.,;«._- . e ze Via,, low • • ' 4 4.... '1 I : -AO,I;V-I -II.I,-, a A ' .. O I -I I I "« .. I �'-i EAVE._ �I�.. ... S.W. - c Icl•ue .�ameinalYa.. �.�r..H -}.aYda -�� y _I - - + - ' 1 • • x 1' +' I .. I. I,. V • -2. -t1.1 l iy 1,7.'f , - 'I -__ i, .L ill Litt4 'TPNI. I, ] • r E,� O T r1 '• I = MARE I I. AVE.° S.W. =v, v I'. I 1 I •R b '1. r 1- '�±ai' 1• L�V.I Y"- a it y ' n 1:1 MP • I' -t •t' R - I vI�Y Y i.. -G - R. • .'.I t :I: Ali • �� _� y V [ erAttlecifr v'Tate'1. I I 1 • s '@ .- 141 ) 7_ -.,. 4 ttisr; `;'',.-; .----=.- srca.xot.a 44,-- L•3r _"'_ .. . ?; AVE^ ,_:. JT I._-.r-; _--.—_-'✓;GELS" f j --_."" _.7r '�sAUE • GRADING AND STORM DRAINAGE PLAN 1 !ef i (n 1-20• WY/20•,AODAAR BLOCK WALL al0 \` 3 —% _^ (PER DETA SHEET CO)IL i H -_—_—_____ 1 Ilr •L'�h I�h°°�'/ /// ��,° g i`Y I�/'4x ,>.) ¢.1511t• \.a //� �-- ,` �° I PEN BETE m Q 4gR \ i i I / ../)'//-.,hA•'' ' .':: ' .1111 / y \'=•a. i \ / VI �1 / .. �. . / 1 .\PG EN116i Z O '� I.,,;. ararlA_rcw i ,,y}; „J' f .„ \rss / U / �`'v/�ctr ,°i ° B6 e..NS I ¢-14.BB• eo �i ,'.-.. v� �` I.1` x_5i o DOSI°. fi.' �St / . - I IITJ ° osxv' . . i' iL I Z'>;,)c 1. I/ : ` �,° nl L \ sae°°vim s. ` \I E. Q LR'E •all:.•_11..DL.: I Irk D010,i Oy MPR• . 1 ' ` F s:g A a�SaD "ir"az° • \.y. ° rev Y. VR I / - .z j r- \ _ ''E,•w = j ��' IE.1 a z b .Jz.. ° I' • // �I o osxB IN° // //.E aaav DRax ` a `: z1sc, I,?' I_il'. w rme I\ of 0 _ w Vi'r,. REwrAnoowwD / / D5. °� , I1 � w o U0.i =€ `" I�I'�111 ilzeois , i!'�f},`...�5 \� / wlr n•I�-I'x69 j // I \� I,I. \,_ \•` W =E 4 + �✓ o Dsxulx' / � a '. n 1 A \ 0 Z a '� \;, IJO 1 .: xpQ{a ye'a 0 3A '7.LF AGO o pW! 45, °, - 4 __ - -e '4.. ..� .I).z • ry '/ ' \°C e 91r. = __ ,✓� 20 'B'p Itil 1 LL I E a W \ __ pp �` 1]?. NEW OE 6UILDING a„_ ' a9 I'Y D L E 1.s3Y' f • •PEW AC0000 CB /° i i,_ �`•° Q N J -7`-aa-- — \ / , OR- EOWt) WU WGF..3LCYCL-rr=1/.ZOyj•,=/ L -- �1 S ,, -U J 3 l?"'l�' Efi-WAY w __ l.:'§' E-Is�)ioz D FIRS•IiLEVEL FF1 27.70c' �_ 'z..)s . cs ' 32� III z �/ oo m 7�IV/! fir raa / trail p r- /.•F_• I- D .° .1 1 'I 1 1i I \ .°ir u'Ins,N?30y D.S�Ky° .L'w I y s �,•§�1�'��� 1- ----� -\`° ' •■' .,3a , q P!L� • `'�`I 1' / • ``.,J ly \ /.5. �� l -_-r ••5 !`NJB olo•MS�, o 5 • III/9 I `. r,..4�B;TlPEI \ / - ux'_ _--- ,I c _ .bz • '.0 ..,`,Aa`\` WU��e1OHIo LOLXNo LD \' J ,b r) u 6 K 1''\\a 1 I° '``�'`� •'` a',71 * c° 0•R00f DRNN .. %•15 ..4 S �������r i z3. \ ..�� •1®! l • I �I t o w �� NEW BVHA�1y . \a ms\` % °J)l#tx'ens x-tx a 050x e�`� /� S\ % •• j NEW 2$L10DULAq[C•..WALL FF"• (PER 0 NL 5H0 C6){1 ° I 1 --ro- zl 4,4 �BP 1�s L1\ �F _�-• , DIY r---- .g1���' .'w' �.B `Owi- -_ , r .\ \ ,- ` ?3 _ er i . 111' v 113•N 57-/� -{ - • - Iy�111 IEW.• z REw w 4001.LM a00JC WALL I ,7. .--y x-' ,r as n-• Q. .. .6'y\.___ _ LI -,�• .' //I//a, �i y`�IX -- � � ,',, •' ,J°B .W _L -��y • ^WNv SEAM WARR SO ix\ F--�---- _`/ N 12 O 3 —% ``°h]SI• ° a rr -?emu • .Y::° 119.. K.ail •\' 4 I SKI• ____- _ - �_ --derva.��`'�°.� I. �°h ^4E 819' °9 '�•9, W I. � \ ' A IX CB -`�' Q /S • ,^.--_---- -fig-:-- -'�>—:aae-- -Armlets, ' ux. '� ------------------ -�� rv'- �— � E�(n•5> `d'}�F`1"cc��o- V-b�Y --•3:= — .'4:� -- /is - — • -�•_ ON w♦ ¢ S art,_ .-;---- F.,..' ..- i. _�___ '_ __IX_�L=— _ �__ 0�_I�,f 1 EXPIRES'1LT\VSI 0 .so c-'^--�u--_�__- . �gTYNOFF RENTTON b o 4\-•-r • Ex.x4s'a ''. - - • LIX.CURB u.SIREEf C7EPAR WORKS `IX.cuxa. �^ iRY c • J0A -- P'.SfREIT LIGHT�'�_� .xt.IJ II GM M-x1.4 0; =x0] IX..��..�.FF.��..LIGHT IE-650(34•W)h'''a' II- - IE-5.°(34•00 A^ IX PNM BIRIPE IX srREE,UGH( .D E=14F(x�E - mount :• ---_ry""u -. �_ -aEx� ]RiOr--'E-HB"4N'£j--I- tl.zs"SD -FYi2-9E E9rJ0'.-. ; E]3J 0'SI So m EPEE GRADING AND STORM Z Y` h Ex vs INE DRAINAGE PLAN m Nx . :. SW 16TH STREET a ., D4,x tz/9ro9 ° IX Ix•w �h-.-- . .L 5 0.B.----.- _-.--_ - ��•1=.----a-- - ---_._---,,Ll'.D�--_.- _-.___ a tiv_ [IR .... 1•.x0 raeun - • �... :,...•P .. a.. .. .. a w<.m, 9r uw ure Imo.® ._,.a... - SOX ff 4 ;::•�`:r -Qli"c.voolOtR: U . . .. C2 I� . rye v Re f v Va lhi�h4-ICi:tB.. _ X• �l "`r, s /rM.-HO) �yif b /e G4+p ° •.�_); Iir2t _':4:*�� • j ASNDVEStram _ Ir `R os®a``B�uWrm. eaT..wva v. • iVti:4' .•' 4.4i..te,61,:_ti{17 • '-- E.44111;1 Wenew Lal Calinoinitnen 5 ' Kwaso 0 D41; il i --. ._-/ - `. 4 I A EL. .IIG,.�.: � pp � aztw1,0,xkse — i I �.E. �»a�,:•�, Mai.Bbala 7. T b ' •r / Cy 4allio ...AKBnK�BOB3PLO.�GR -W. Mnrr•L 0 a( y�� � 0' c `� =� �{ �- � • StravtworraintrIama web I. 1 ILL LmotP4,40 Imp. r.',. 4 clit SMALL uW :�o�..o...J err.t a B i to AA ,� �: �{'+rCa.IK4Hq.. :'.3 �pv/p \•�.i /�� •�l Ktt4l'®cnommcosRs-Loe.rv-.. W .rit:'. O S/ l 1��,1,.�`il n.m.larw.n:+Xm..�e Winfj 2 t .. � � .. �'1 t, Avi { }f�l ....n.u�.Lr.mwn = W �j��p 1' �1 . .i Wi !� 'Jfial wrlo. ¢C7 � 1I_' u, \.a �Vp e� 'i I :J o toIV CO 7�''' .• .- iPROPOSED BUILDING `` • 0_.. CC '^ .,� '''' J �I�,i/ {' 1� n_OakRacA(irsm61se.wm.nr.ay.n...3 �� ���,\ ��h� •? '.��, v+kr cE) LJB aGYKI�YO�Aa z O ai o'fig% A � Y�ifla o Ayi _ L / I. SCHEMACTNALEND_ IC TIVE PLANT MATERIAL VW 11.4Wel.e.cam +.'' tr_o /1,11A ri&H,"'ig. _..."-'-'4';';'14.4110, A, et..4 2, ' orii*. : ; 5 7 r �� 4 ``4'O .M�•/fA•�.V pa�:N,{ x 2y�� /��is ��P.nAa.�a E•�.1� ,�t'ca'•�1,.. �-' rl�a'! > , 'u U AV wv Ga,gt. �A\ l. Wm.m � ARCHITECTURE - r: r �` / � �� �` NAm[Sevou rrlp�,vac... and PLANNING z '+ .T� , M-••• _�� ��, �•O 1� a -- t OtlnM1[.nrll�o ROYCEA.BERG,PRINCIPAL . 'lr � \L ,. .• . I ��' R^ Y.KBI K.CHIN.PRINCIPAL "'tin. ............_ / ...n I.-4M AVE SOLI.SUITE O �� `� , NB'^•TI „ � /� _\\ ` Yvtt .••,(��/ • •� B...P.9(H.-.- r..h Ong..GrowWzapnfornon SFAiIIF.WASNB:GPON 9B13. J '� ♦ Pe�IIJIF..py11iJ .f %'^ `� `r�^ P.r..Kn.pa..vSaimgdwrylKaonenar. ROW/ AMA PAL SBimoB `^ a q �' r.l I.vw ei I• !�'7/ ��� W Ras m,..�.n. roc ��iti �► /` . 11e.. .�*�IKti s^T+n n aa�I'wA ]n�>I • %//�• Mara GLOM COW., emu-. ► 4� _ _ i�1�9 LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION NOTES 'L.. �� f214111F74110111r, A � Al L� NM A 1� I m.�r wolw vs.,WY..ma Lawn tabor.In bap anwsuisima V' .� / � ,I� � F` ���`1 I1 �I /� 'a°n.I..��ar.rw�r L.o,s.+Y...BGsnan4L,.I.aawL.r Won.by cwoWng all onsAWNW worm*bags,or.,mob.YAW*. ,NO DESd21PB(ki DALE fit Ir�I/el�Ir✓#/' ,.. �� a..�,..a...m..r�....8m..o+s..m,. s E PUN arP. ... yY r.♦. f4n4 ' /rE • � �L _ '���. -1( ram WW iwWsr�1s mll In ,y 9. � � �li u i 1 i.{�I ....I i:::i•':•".':r::. ....,...[,„.1..:. '•. ma ••...:.. ..�.::•:•::::.•.:•. I - sI -a', ...� �"�`-�.r.a:..l..rdan-B.w.. .. I 41.Pmfn..L�.e.0 .Anal...�r.d ": .. .".:: `:.. ATwIr AID er.0 41ekbwlLc nave to wnr.robs I{MNsi,hl{�tll •'I =�16./fYl�tLtsy -H./°PHrt�H('+I(ar. t swannuao s..wWsgew pima.maodal....�e.w.rrwru.ar.r u�"-��c /LAME4‹. sar.aWmnan.w u.�.enm gw.1No wq �r°u au a ..w.e'�n.m`rr°nr '. w.� d � f it., (..,..I...�,.ea..s...I.e,BI.r.—,—. 5311 ▪ aG pf. WOm.w.Gvan...l. ap.sW.rrImv Law.. • SW 18TH STREET AB* :.v°)u..�: ...W.w«Wanm..nwr..W .Pne.ae.......�n.a.o.MP.mem.*t.un.ABW......OfW o.,mw.B.,.B.fa..Q.l.a...a..b(Wag,W9 WWle ..P..BI.0 - ,•.Inn.P.Bo..v.P....Iw.I....earp. --------------- :r a^:m "e . . .'°M"..� SCHEMATIC — — — __— _—_ In......B,I.I-r.Prad.....a..B..aOw.,I.e..l..... LANDSCAPE PLAN . . w • • Lauchlin R.Bethune Associates .Landscape A.dd.n A Enviro.aaaIPA.* ASIA - Le.S.r.Sa.al. P..•: (.ISM mansKe.•Wml.p.NOR (:d.4:(uf),5Ie.,. o .o. oo w fig' Bo' , Fn. 044/SITE-E6.OWG r iti . JOB NO.: IN044 SHEET NO OF: I.�p. 'O"" DATE: 0-2416 •� DRAWN:4QflfPAJ L1.! SCHEMATIC LANDSCAPE PLAN 20' 1 -CHECK:iff,/Qfj n•rfi� To Pah9i+l� 1 4+t fl1►1/Je• s:' 8' . t I"• �► � 'lr^•,� `� .1-I '7.� �I III`°r'NbGv'Ali�/ ;,m *f - — �, / * •_; �`�� 1 4 SCHEMATIC PLANT MATERIAL LEGEND ( 44 0 ��� r _jez ;• �� :l r i �� r. ,I'j EC DB&B at 1 Liskwru mrHm.ca•r.. /0 :' T ai► /. .,. 9$1.1 . / � �y,��� `- I� (x7 iT'.-fg) • Norway ar ot�r6w n n n Red MapWAcer manure ,L��&' " • :✓' • coN�FarRErs�win eumo� 1 /- / , = • O!I..®� wexn.Red Ced.nn./.pUa. • �' An.", ,� , •/ te r ��H • • , •..,..„.". try* / ,%� 1km iy wta 11111141106 ,i..: �t�l 1,d.oi. )06... '�' ,„•; • HKaman Roaming Cherry/Pm/nu sartI rwmwm• r ��` SMALL FLOWERING 4 Pa it `; b, ...4. 1 t �I'� i s �1 �+`+� 'x^ t..//Gel lam' / --- J t ll .� n°"ed.i FWI ovad� nw/ar/ad" /i�C..- / EVERGREEN ANDDECmIIOQSFIAWERAGSHA0B5-70"he1gh11tBHar5.e Q • ♦ . / / GM,-,�,Cr�° LZ-1 RYOdOdLWdO �W.mrMpt l \ ir�o—� '�^jO" �t �! j��; lt� ( Fo,estFlamene,w�+r/baw•, F— •�• ` BteawbCfl7 dHadroarl,4l.mrer.do#,Igl: . )1ijy... - 16. +0 4 ^, I, I bD Lenevt.w.ml°mW u V�,►► '•, �� ! I snfALLFLowERmcSHRUBS-2pnoocmmlxrara•no. Alli Aultalllialokatbox cedes 0. • _ _ 4 ` ti: ti7 eip-,..../..43,4_ ___________..... • %i" David Vibar=mMD,awm&via0 1e,,.�� ammacealSoroaeenmre#lo1L Ill O r. II c ROUND COVERS 1 aru^a< ' e..11.70.;;,-1 ':)`1' a q�y I �1` . , ,/'�;. >\��i Feryy...de.roar�aro r�e...°E. W \1 Z I ico— . �' ��OO� „�;j..p 1 7 i erw+ca.turro+®•r.r�r,.. O W 0 ,•" \" `�f11� r. � fMt \ J I ME rERExNUOLOR PerLA sec• att10.oz. V W z �t C1 ! • Ji uwN • r1 COit I_ i �1• IFaI 1 Sod otymvm Washington O 2 ts' - Q\ . 1\1 :i'f.-- ` �•,` ROUGH SEED EROSION CONTROL GRASSES Q X a ` / ■ 1�•1 .�,. CCI r . HydmsN lmr.BAn4�-AH lien dlmFted.1............. De seNed wRh unre Qtuu Q 1— I. i•: .• '>�A� PROPOSED BUILDING. ' AOCH otrtcltoFs m ��! ,- y+ O t !; . ea.aa CrtCkCnvih 350M00n-751em Set with flat tops lid square fronts Z . .WiltI�s/t��� '�'�``\ i, •,t711. �_���./ 1�,,�� � Roatrro.c,:,d.R.ehc.�ux-nn U31 /' .ice ,�j® �.`�\ Irk'f �/1 - f_ .`/ I� ITPTT,' 1 �.�`!i f•'-t-` ':t , ® EXOTThG'IEIEPS TO AEMADt = OOZri �, l a \ 11 �1�►L�si nO W• . / CO cc �; -:., 1 ��1 1♦l • I • • i L•1,,S'j z . : iL ;END• R ;��; • • t, �• 4 ' ' ► �, ,. ,, ...sue, Ah. % ,�►��:� BCC e;„tI ° I •lie �f.�16/�� ti � ,l x O�IWH Vine lc NInob svdc..im � 1a� o1y♦trth tea* i .. ,r -,�_: valneNmebatwFhy:atwpvs�amt+ /� +r �A. �� �i� \ �f+l G�� / »' ` 'i•� �J!%k?��- • "�'E t NArrv6CONIFERutirs—s1 tom,BBB n tr o.c. 3 '' ,' ({b����w4 � r •. o,.t�,�/1� oi��A ^�,t� x tip,: /�`'1: Douglas 61./Psradotorge wanted ' , ` •`-r e / .w "�.dam!�, _ . y •.\, ‘,1 Western eawae Calar ARCHITECTURE �,�. r�:�.:�r�j" i�`' l: �' :,, s:i•1emcF+sQ. ,� V-C - .i • 41 `t A.;::,--iit'll-EVEZEINIZEMMIMMIR111111-17--%*rak-40 .— _101- u. Whi Aa,oIL ` and PLANNING /,r'•:-� • `R .,-,iAitlega� imi •• � � 'I i NA17VE sertQHs ai^heWt.n u•ocJr • - f ! ', ,rolrwlJem ROYCE A.BERG,PRINCIPAL • ., i m,, y ,� . -- ---- ;I 1! Black Hswuonfae.ri.+tagt®7 Y.KEN K.CHIN,PRINCIPAL �C . *t _ �,I �•■ /.✓ aI II v` SWUC 66e4rAdlon1535-4TH AVE SOUTH.SUITED �,! , 1 r. �"n ..- gl�jam•�-\ l 1 is7 �L1O0h'r SEATTLE.WA.SHINGTON 9H131 '' �� � ��•fr nv ����j/ '1 '� ��/ dubusprvyfekorda krus (206/5B3-8030 FAX 583-0708 1,r ` •% � ... 1. \`., rHmb&berryve.UT^^o I a �' ���1.��i I� �. ���1►_,mow 1. salmm6ert7 _ '�E•'%'��" �I' It7lI ��� t ♦ J '�Tt �I ,, Red Flowering Bidamd.wan'Nootka Rose/Rosa undone a�v�s'. Jv `` I M� , .., �� '7/� ► Smwbemy,Sy.,phw;rnpmd6ar 0 4 a44 4% tattni �+/• "!" t �/ 1. t'I - ,0' 4 NATIVE InadnnGROUN COVERS �o . • c / I1, ` 214 I i r•• ®I ,.M'I� �T•I17 .I hi Low Oregon GrnpofMaAW.moms 6=619 y'` �� _ all iiiiV LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION NOTES r•.� P r'� rs 'Ilk I.Clean mbpade by removing all undesirable vegetation Iw■ding grasses.weed..marhnetrw, • Viii; � ea / emrm broom lid poplar eeamiop Wading rnaa Leave sobR.ee m landscape areas din®i" 0 iJy i1 ,, D••: `i ._ P 1 �� A fir, �I , NO DESCRIPTION DATE �� / ,�, It,�• c .r below paving.Remove all debris from Me. .$: �' �� I�/� ®�� S Provide m mWmm ft^depth and from Paget uSound in topsoil iland gla-07n4 t N tomb beds SITE PLAN APP. .A��i� n1� tit✓s�/A� ...,....� � i� l it" benHd.bp.demovealldniisfr add ommv>cads.oer.«.iemp>oD.ada.bpaaeuarmrrly r j ` �r� / d =/ l e f*/ �/, Add additional topsoil as needed m contour shrub beds lacadiagberms. — — — — — ��� � �a_1 11 E • 0.t1 . r a Provide.wmm6^depm6o�o ads from dbitrsm.eropam(lu)iuwrai■minr.beds r 1 :i'I �' / II . `S i 1 1 �f snrHrarnuadabrrammu.g ud add ew�®nrtaw mix topmoudabpadeuara.pdy. c.:•..:..: .,.• �( �dv ns 4.Add wadlo ammo 2"depth I ebkmnrand-fir vel mark to - -......•.y. ... ..:....... .. .... .. ':.:. -. a Provide arum®x^depeh�nt blend b�-fir omlch to ail pleating bear Mulch from Pacific •_ 1 _ Topsoils,Kent,wnbingW. alpWwg beds and lawn.mnmwttbi■I"of top erm emir md Mar411 ti104 walks Slope all planting beds cad lawn to drat.. F�P'(h f y -/�6.I/'�1G11.e . -r/ 5.Provide one cu year warranty for alplant. alsandworlm..aip.Iocnr,protecmad 611"114 /Pas w� Al '.76• void disruption of all above and below grade utilities and Ott frames prior to tanstr,r . it-1(JI 1�A�, h'f1ii-f 1j i# Contractor t responsible for any re.lu.g damages during madam:on.Call locate before yen dig I ll+�✓W at 1600 424saaa 6 SW 18TH STREET •All performed perform shall maform with City of Renton Wdeape lid la-air/Wonremair� 4 tn codes sad specifications. &Verify all quantities showa o•the phut list and plan H di>oepaaoie exist between the graphic representataa and the=mark totals,the graph&mpreentat=MAT Mc All plus=Medals D.be specimen quality with fa,symmetrical 1mb and foliage,den otherwise noted Ferb7la all \ - - - pWO.pwim"Omaraeof aaYtabsl,Il lenrto per lasteet.plodwater than",Its ppertragboles less than a I eraP per orpropS pl.v1pey=d1p<,IAenppe 6l blil.pots. - - - 9.ynmmh,orIf drainage of mils ll am vi edeprarmlucapromWect.FM HnWgbeWen SCHEMATIC -- - - - - - do not dramor5 ,1Wy 2 and iMde.t comas 6.ad4"potitas FIo.dIm planting areas to and - - - - - - - - - - - - - - lawn.mastowithml"of top ofaHmrbsaadwalks Berm all pWtingbedt�lawnamnto LANDSCAPE PLAN 10.Locate,protect and avoid disruption of all above and below grade=Bides and site features prior to tonrimctioa Contractor responsible for any resulting damage dotigmWraclioa. Lauchlin R Bethune Associates ■ Landscape Architects&Environmental Planners,ASLA 6625 South IfO1h Sheet,Salta B-I01 phone: (42S)251.0455 Root,Wo,bmgma r.032 fnedmae:(415)2Si-0476 111(727 0 10' 20' 40' BO. /, File:99044/SITE—E6.DWG t• JOB NO.: 90044 SHEET NO OF: 1'..20' NORTH DATE: 6.24.00 ' • DRAWN:I RAJ Llml SCHEMATIC LANDSCAPE PLAN 20' 1 -CHECK:I/*, Smooth Feed SheetsTM I • Use template for 5160w I • . ! • I • I II cm- l45� ; j ; I , i ; III MSI 800 S.W. 16th, LLC I I Benaroya Capital CompanyI Bitney Grouws Company 1109 First Avenue, Suite 500 I 1001 -4th Avenue, Suite 4700 , ! 108 Factory Ave. No., Suite 1 Seattle, WA 98101 Seattle, ' TA 98154 I ' Renton, WA 98055 i — — il ` — -- - - - - _/ I ; Cummins NW, 'nc. Sheperd Investings, Inc. City of nton 811 S.W. Grady Way •! ' 335 - 116th Avenue S.E. I 1055 th Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Bellevue, WA 98004 enton, WA 98055 — — —lI — — IIi I II 1 III ! l I , I r ' I l - Ii- I • 11 li I � I I I - - I 6 AVERY® Address Labels I ! Laser 5160® 1 1 I I....VaPir.Tele,.1-:..••••.1 ., 1, '1.i., . ,,Cri 11.?•",,A4•11.11:-.I.m..••?..,,' . :•,,,,• .. - ' . _ .... .,____....-- •.•.• t 10 •••". e ;1••"'" ,J•,...).,;G:\•I 1'i-' . .4...:-.4...--,---,.....,,7!.....,„,--E--- A , - 4.:•/1-1.--. '.. It.•%1:cf, ...,;.1......,...v.,.. ,iiiii imm ,'„ill, 1 ';P::\-?,::•.??V:1, \:'':„\.‘. -- '''''...?•,-7.:. 1111 ...., ,, 4 •- • ''''..A7\7,,' .." „ !;../Th(1.‘'''"?.•-"---"-''\ ''. ''' ;t :,,..!.,..„. .._,., \-.I.Z3);\V•:,...;-----•3tit '.1\''-L. —WEE— v ER'--------,.. .--a- ‘ i ':i.,.._..., i-- •''•.•., 1/7. +, ... i ,.. \ i II ', - ,,," 1 •:. 2, ::::::,..—-:. .;'.. J 4,...„,„ RES ' RAR'...4 MAUS.' . I& . I .1 . - / ill !" NO" '‘,1,, 4___------- .14.11. ------ ---.-- 5 •% -14------------, --• 81.1 :11 A \A .-,--:::=-.. .- 0:Si g Dun. u,f Eaumo‘,„. - . .„ . ,.. _ ----- ----, ------------ ---...go B4,,I. ;114\ 1, -...41k00 0 --- ----- ' lInn 0 1 i EIEM:.„..--:. F.'p. : , •P A - A • . ? =EnEUED,1 ",= -4.. •'';'( ^, • \vik.S:' ' ' ' ''Clisi 1 .'•:' '.: . - ,M'lig! 1 11;;;:.4'1,,I, ..= - 1.7 '-.'r- ..7. e .. •Rog: ,v-1, ..millillap V -^,-- --t-1 . -• Mi`: ,•.- = 1 ''•‘: I g e,.1 ..,,!,1;,:l.lir •-tilet..,- '7,2, -:g ,„ 7.- I... Kai ,SAFILI .10 -lij tf 7!;I: j*"1114F71. IR. \.._ .i..674„;ip';':.#,,0,1ai EV :..,.\..4- ic . • PARK - E _••••:!:L,:i:....AiLK,..;:;r„,;,1:':'sit t:',1,, :!-i 9.1\?,-,,,v-...- mi-' '":"" -c-,-,-. I- !1"iii,p1...1,',c,7.„, -...Aciii, ty,.\T. ...,-* ,..,4 ARLINGTON INCA ___--.71_,__,.,,__',,.- -_._'±th2tlit-L41t4. :•'-'',-- tt',.,J-,-:-:-.74f;-'-111'1 ._ I c1p1:, _ii!.'"''1••••.i I 1"'•i';;q';li'li, A: •'7't''W...,e...-t:-'i 2t.,l in i V i - ' ' , A , . 'I._... -,,_,--- wilt i,h, ik . 0- -, , 5 Pi iS, , .:. Tr' j ' L ZT... .41143,V4.1111..'V 4 ; 1 .1.!....ti ..... . . i` g ,il 1 ,;&4,.:;',1,,k1 i;il I . ,, ( , .. .m.: ININ,. • di,';• ,. , _____ zi.;,..,,,IY 1%r•IL....4.40,,Vg,AN I E -;•••., -.7;0:17.1-.1:4y....i...:_•.:1.:', ----t:- - 11,,„:,k,14.-, 'Vat t•-•-a.7A-3. x f-,i t . lit 1" 1."A VA-, ?A\ - F• - • .,,: ,Ka 1 : : , , Irt:_, , L . >----- i• : : :i•I ' r, -''' -it At, 1 1, ACK.1..._-_,-,2 -.,----7.- ZiTiKT------.--=----- -1,-- „.7-"" ."; -..'7.7"--",,,- - •', ./Jr..- . 11111 i' a X g I 1JOHN C.RADOVICH DEVELOPMENT CO. D i I li i 0 i i 4-, - 00WO OFFOCE FA©DDT' Aql ., 1. t i . 115,11 ',- 000 SW 18TH STREET r. RENTON.WASHINGTON C)Ose'') ts cm) CITY OF RENTON CITY CLERK DIVISION MEMORANDUM DATE: April 8, 2002 TO: David Christensen FROM: Rita Cornejo SUBJECT: Bill of Sale—John C. Radovich Development Company Rec. #20020115002712 Utilities Easement—John C. Radovich Rec.#20020115002713 The attached documents have been recorded with King County, and are being returned to you. Please forward copies to parties of interest, and retain a copy for your file. Thank you. Enclosures: (2) . _ 2 RETURN REG STER-RECEIPT ANL DiLLING SUMMARY SHEET WITH MONTH Y INVOICE/STATEMENT TO NAME AND ADDRESS LISTED BEL'W King County ; . Records and Elections Division Records Section Department of Executive Administration 311 King County Administration Building . Seattle.Washington 98104 (206)296-1570 • RECORDING AC OUNT BILLING KING COUN • RECORDS (Billing Sum ary Sheet) Date: . /92-/1-0 RECORDS&ELECTIONS CUSTOMER# 47 U 300028 5 0 y'5 Name/Customer City'Clerks Division • Address of Agency City of Renton • • to be billed that 1055 S. Grady Way have established Renton, WA 198055 a billing.account with ' . • King County Records ONLY . 41141/ 01,--7 I-L. 9' A- 0��, Contact Name: Suzann or B nnie I g.. av Phone Number:•. 425 430-65.0 Number of documents eateai,d-g3l-D'+ i to be recorded r e C--- Zuv?—. 0/11760 y7/3 ****************************************************** (FOR KING COUMY ECORDS USE ONLY) Recording numbers # of Docum nts • Fee TOTAL . • • , • GRAND TOTAL RAB94 CITY OF RENTON DEC 1 7 2001 DOCUMENTS F R RECORDING RECEIVED KING COUNTY RECORDS &ELECTIONS DIVISION CITY CLERK'S OFFICE TO: CITY'CLERK'S OFFICE DATE: (0 I 1(-1 101 FROM: Jc () �II If ci n Plan ( /i e - ) x-7a I C� extension) BILLING ACCOUNT NUMBER: 05,200 G� 607. ,ter,3r Q7�CC '1?:C�GC j1 ( xxxxxxl. ••'.xxxQc.xxxx.xx. aoc): IS REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX FORM REQ D? No' Yes ❑ (Attach form) (Account will be charged S2.00 filing fee) INDEXING NOTES: s e gcj GM( P d) , 'u0" a►s g l t oco a3o, 00 SfW, S+ Fou hee"/ hQ 55 SPECIAL RECORDING INSTRUCTIONS: i DATE ACQUIRED: G OR " � C �CI CI U IC t1 PURPOSE: COMMON DESCRIPTION: 611 0 -� Goi le. Qncl •CG ADDRESS: P.I.D. S-T R: CROSS STREETS: W I(6 1- GO (3 () CURRENT USE: MANAGING DEPARTMENT: DEPT.FILE#. CORDING# Rev Date 7/97 TS/REC_DOC.DOT/bh `• • Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA BILL OF SALE Property Tax Parcel Number. 334040-6260 Project File#: U000230 Street Intersection: 900 SW 16th Street Reference Number(s)of Documents assigned or released:Additional reference numbers are on page Grantor(s): ! IGrantee(s) 1. John C.Radovich Development Company 1. City of Renton,a Municipal Corporation The Grantor,as named above,for,and in consideration of mutual benefits,hereby grants,bargains,sells and delivers to the Grantee,as named above,the following described personal property now located at: WATER SYSTEM: Length Size T 799 L.F.of T " ' D•1• Water Main 130 L.F.of 6 " D.I. Water Main L.F.of Of Water Main 3 each of 8 " Gate Valves 4 each of 6 " Gate Valves 3 each of Fire Hydrant Assemblies SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM: Length • Size Type L.F.of If Sewer Main L.F.of It Sewer Main L.F.of " Sewer Main each of " Diameter Manholes each of " Diameter Manholes each of " Diameter Manholes STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM: Length Size Type L.F.of Storm Line • L.F.of Storm Line L.F.of " Storm Line each of Storm Inlet/Outlet each of " Storm Catch Basin each of 11 Manhole STREET IMPROVEMENTS: (Including Curb,Gutter,Sidewalk,Asphalt Pavement) • • 'von',t' Sidewalk 410 L.F. Asphalt Pavement: '— SY or — L.F.of -- Width STREET LIGHTING: #of Poles Q By this conveyance,Grantor will warrant and defend the sale hereby made unto the Grantee against all and every person or persons,whomsoever,lawfully claiming or to claim the same. This conveyance shall bind the heirs,executors, administrators and assigns forever. E:\bce\doc\doc7000\7301.007.doc\bh Page 1 IN WHE , have hp unto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. IND DUAL FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT No Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS 1001 00111111//j COUNTY OF KING ) `E• p0a�j4 I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that • •�A • ►ROA lAthQ signed this instrument and •' OTAR t'; Is acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes �....480 S = mentioned in the instrument dui; PUBl1C '�j • ��ffpp �•. Z�:•6 Notary Public in andfor the S ate Washington �Nll 11110�``` My appointmen xpirNotary(Priik) Is:S I 05 Dated: {n 1 Notary Seal must be within box INDIVIDUAL FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF1WASHINGTON )ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: . Dated: Notary Seal must be within box REPRESENTATIVE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF1 WASHINGTON )ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument,on oath stated that he/she/they was/were authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the and of I to be the free and voluntary act of such party/parties for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Erint) My appointment expires: Dated: E:\bce\doc\doc7000\7301.007.doc\bh Page 2 • Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA Title: UTILITIES EASEMENT Property Tax Parcel Number: 334040-6260 Project File#: U000230. Street Intersection or Project Name: S.405 Place Reference Number(s)of Documents assigned or released:Additional reference numbers are on pages 4 and 5. Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1. John C.Radovich Development Company 1. City of Renton,a Municipal Corporation The Grantor,as named above,for,and in consideration of mutdal benefits,hereby grants,bargains,sells and delivers to the above named Grantee, the following described property: Idditional legal is on page of document. (Abbreviated legal description MUST go here) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: All that certain real property situate in the City of Renton,King County,State of Washington,being portions of Block 36 of"C.D.Hillman's Earlington Gardens Div.No. 1", recorded in Volume 17 of Plats,Page 74, King County Records in the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter and the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 24, Township 23 North,Range 4 East,Willamette Meridian,more particularly described as follows: See attached additional legal description. By this conveyance,Grantor will warrant and defend the sale hereby made unto the Grantee against all and every person or persons,whomsoever,lawfully claiming or to claim the same. This conveyance shall bind the heirs,executors, administrators and assigns forever. 0.019 k t f 09'X. IN WI WHE I. I have h- eunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. tek . 2 A IND DUAL FORM OFACKNOWLEDGMENT Not. eal be ithin box STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS ��1111Ury COUNTY OF KING ) ,JQV B9LTo //� I certifythat I know or have satisfactory evidence that N ter- � t•. gton�• ••• , ; WOW signed this instrument and r10TAR, S acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes • �— : C mentioned'in the instrument PUBC%C c 410 ,,gy�pp �19�'••. 1.�:•'6� Notary Public in d f the, a e of ashington OIinii � ��` No PMrint) .J 3I6_ Myoint�men/t expires: Dated: MAY Y I ;ill Notary Seal must be within box INDIVIDUAL FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss COUNTY IOF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: Notary Seal must be within box REPRESENTATIVE FORM OFACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument,on oath stated that he/she/they was/were authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the and of to be the free and voluntary act of such party/parties for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss COUNTY OF KING ) On this day of ,19 ,before me personally appeared to me known to be of the corporation that executed the within ins I ment,and acknowledge the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and de d of said corporation,for the uses and purposes therein mentioned,and each on ath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the s al affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. Notary Public in an for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: • EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION EASEMENT FOR WATER LINES Portion of King County Tax Lot No. 334040-6261 • All that certain real property situate in the City of Renton, King County, State of Washington, being portions of Block 36 of "C.D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Div. No. 1", recorded in Volume 17, of Plats, Page 74, King County Records, in the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter and the Northeast Quarter of they Southeast Quarter of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian, mor particularly described as follows: Utility EASEMENT for water lines and facilities, appurtenances thereto and maintenance thereof, A t y � pp in, on, over, under, though, and across uniform strips-of-land, 15.00 feet in width, (unless noted otherwise), 7.50 feet on both sides of the centerlines described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner oil Lot 17, of said Block 36, of said Plat; Thence, along the Northerly Right-of-Way line of SW 16' Street, parallel with and 30.00 feet Northerly from the centerline of SW 16' Street, North 89°26'59" East 134.66 feet, to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of the centerlines of the herein described strips-of-land; THENCE, leaving said Northerly Right-of-Way line, along the following courses: 1) North 00°33'01" West 13.50 feet; 2) North 46°13'15" East 5.00 feet, to Point "A"; 0'"", 4".,,,,,,,��.~��""`± E. 3) North 46°13'15" East 19.50 feet; r` '�`• �;N 4) North 43°48'01" West 30.00 feet; ,r;. O h'U;,y.'.,.X r; 5) North 27°12'27" West 111.00 feet; Y1w N'i\i• ° / n " "• `_ t;:* • �, 6) North 44 16 57 East 59.00 feet, to Point B , t ..7) North 44°16'57" East 44.50 feet; i - =74- , 8) North 68°16'19" East 109.00 feet; i  - , .4 :1 ; 9) North 89 29 19 East 60.00 feet; Y it.... 1 �itv:•�,��• ' 10) South 01°15'48"West 5.50 feet, to Point "C"; S 9 *� 11) South 01°15'48" West 25.50 feet, to Point "D"; ; EXPIRES 8/30/A, 12) South 01°15'48" West 233.20 feet, m �,"" ", ",,, to the Northerly Right-of-Way line of SW 16 Street. ALSO, Beginning at Point "A", described above, Thence, North 47°55'17" West 37.00 feet. ALSO, Beginning at Point "B", described above, Thence, North 45°43'03" West 37.00 feet. ALSO, Beginning at Point "C", described above, Thence, South 88°44'12" East 24.50 feet. ALSO, a strip-of-land 25.00 feet in width, 12.50 feet on both sides of the centerline described as follows: Beginning at Point "D", described above, Thence, North 88°44'12" West 40.50 feet. The above described strips-of-land contains approximately 12,700 square feet, more or less. SEE ALSO "Exhibit Map" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, for a graphic representation of the herein described strips-of-land. End of Description Prepared by: Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. \ATLANTIS\PROJECTS\sdskproj\7301\doc\7301 esmw.doc Mike Hotes Page 1 04/03/00 , SO113.29"W 321.41' r.----14-10.00 -= Tax Lot No. 33404 -6261 W n . CD • 5 CC j ' I .S881442"E 0 I El ❑ I y 2 . 0 t. 'D' 5.5' S0115' "W 233.20' L . I 2.55 — ,--- s — --+-----�--- —I,--1 . .........._. s : 'I II Pt 'C' n N88' j W ['i) 13_� . ` � 40.50'5° : .Cri og Z ;l - ♦ L • Z 1♦ ♦ 15.0 ;1J .30' m r) \ . \♦ ' LINE CASEMENT q. 1,\ \ >hs \ ; 1, 2, 0 ± sq.ft. \ ' \V \ PRUPOS�b • `♦ 15% .0' 12}00 • \-- \ ‘ % \Vs\ \ BUILD NG \ ido\ ' N. Pt. 'A' \4, ♦♦ f � ss co ; i .®4. A\Fo� / O A�p eX j T.P.O.B. .P....O...B. ` i ♦ •`SOS ♦Z l'c dill OF6 .. -•Ro � , cc sta1+35.5508 ....lII\ ,--,, ,. =<2 � ` A ' 0e1 ' ` * � N003301"W ,1-00 \ I 1� Th - 4sitiii ✓✓✓YYY 1 2� 10 taI N 11 s c 4 . re) Z • NO111'57"E 297.68' • ~=---~ oo E N— - 6 i4. -—,QS EXHIBIT MAP - WATERLINE EASEMENT ` ' ` PORTIONS of N.E.1/4 of S.E.1/4 & S.E.1/4 of N.E.1/4 W SECTION 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. a 15 30 eo City of RENTON KING County State of WASHINGTON r Scale 1'=60' File: P:\SDSKPROJ\7301\SURVEY\7301EXHW.DWG Date/Time: 04/04/2000 06:54 Scale: 1=60 Mikeh Xreis: • CITY + RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department 7 e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator June 8, 2001 Rocky Jones LPN Architects 3003 80th Avenue SE Mercer Island, WA 98040 Subject: South 405 Place File No. LUA-99-186 / Building Permit No. B000242 Dear Rocky: Thank you for providing me with an updated copy of the site plan for the above referenced project. The relocation of the three trees as indicated on your plan would not result in a reduction of the overall amount of trees approved for the project and is acceptable as presented. This revision to the site plan will be documented in the land use and building permit files. If you have further questions, please feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7270. Sincerely, Lesley Nishi ' a Senior Planner Cc: Paul Baker, Code Compliance Yellow File ,910 1901-2001 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 x �4 ? This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer h �, ARCHITECTURE&PLANNIP: ,NC. ROYCE A. BERG,A.I.A., PRINCIPAL PHONE: (206)230-6648 3003 80TH AVENUE SOUTHEAST FAX: (206)230-6647 MERCER ISLAND,WA 98040 MEMORANDUM VIA FAX AND MAIL TO: Lesley Nishihira DATE: June 5, 2001 .0 City of Renton '` PROJECT: South 405 Place ;--, 0 ® y, � TIME: 10:12 AM PROJECT NO: 99044 10 6' Q RE: Permit#B000242 Leslie, We would like to submit this site plan exhibit f r your records. During construction 3 trees were relocated from the original approved sit plan. There is no reduction in the total number of trees or amount of landscaping. If you have any questions or comments leas give us a call. Rocky A. Jones7 Project Manager LPN Architects c.c. Craig Bumell, City of Renton ✓ Rebecca Davidson, JCR Development Eric Jones, Foushee & Associates V Royce A. Berg, LPN Architects _ Lauchlin Bethune, Landscape Architect encl. 1 • I-405 FREEWAY (HATCH INDICATES 43,377 V''. CF PARIONG LOT LANDSCAFYNG,) MIN.SR OF PARKING AREA 4 PROPOSED LANDSCAPED RELOCATE 2 TREES - ---,.. ,• ;REVD.(32738 SF .,,rDA ;,/. ,. ISETPOND,STORAGE AREA 10'NIMNUN l., •.�..h.l..�• ' TO ISLANDS AT EAST STE LIGHTING� LANDSCAPE REQUIRED' TRASH&RECYCLE DOMING TREE • POLE W RAI ,.../..r,n, ENCLOSURE LOCATION GROUP TO REMNN SIDE OF PARKING AREA CONC.BASE 24 OF RENT SEE 5/A-21 ABV.GRADE TYP. IUTS(iUCK TURNING _ ENSTING EMERGENT __ _ ___ _ __ _ _ X£RAND S B8'08'4•W 1. -- _- __ __ __ -_ _ ._...._-_.- _ F--..-,-,-,-i----- ((\m4-.s--4:!Ap 4f,i9--- - -- r - _------ --_ - __ /'........ __ __________ ..._..... `ate` TI ""'�','� / ' ;:i Q 1 � .:-- � 12 ta�.......: ................ .� r•'� RELOCATED I �+i� , / j FOOL AANON. 1I I TREE O 13 1 TW. BASIN 1 ��•\ WGS I\, I I 1 //'//''' - I TW.SEE tlN I (.1.,, I.,_,. �..,:,, ',: ?Ili. _ ,•` ,`� �LANOSCAPE H" ,7 Z I /� x:jgAN FORMER I 8 ::�'.' %i -s,,` �r TYr.wu0E W °I ;.`_ :( AREA �ri D I I moo sTORATE /%//•- c' LOCATION `c' a (� S� 0 ° C ' r LANDSCAPE'', 21 ' I o ERNu G a SEE aw. .-%/ -_ ',y..1 I - u o ";�' LW. I O t\V i I //. / \ �: ' NNRE GENSET ..0 •......i..._ ),,,,,,EA. y ,r( J O ` /,.;'��r ' " / LOCATION .�. ,`-0� : 4c ,. ROCKERY I `f:/. d ' _ 4 SEE qVL DWL. I��«� uNE of o �v; � � AOL1 ,I I RELOCATEDI N.IIl`I RBo�ArG/ ' cI i'»� I .II It TREE x IL �'`11, anti.,CARD I ENTRY la j;Ilil F.¢ 1t, ^--- ��. p'_�I\. (yd$�� V r[ HZ �' I!)I,1 �--e�:,-,.. .... ,,{ `1 \�G"e�°°• C A APE I ,. eir4 11I o' TABULATION 1 /_ % I Cana ae0 I ; {4 .\` �Q `. '`'p' ?r' `:,+i 1 0 1.1 ' _Q / li �• 1 ( �. T J �� GAO Q\R} \p • I III SITE AREA t126,B76 S.F. a I� Q r `32,700 SF LANDSCAPE `1ni}I ate.•.::1 ` /i'l%J� '� '-'•" ' !' G�i V�, � UNE OF \ _. . �.i I NET SITE AREA t95J256 S.F. Cr '- AREA FOR HABITAT, I /:// ko - *\ c •V x•l p, OVERHANG I`. N� 7 1 GROSS BLDG.AREA .,,..\ 2 U 3 Z l Zx OF CROSS AREA I f %:':%! 0 Mi \' 1' 1 O �R 01( tl'•n, _L'-'1 I I `� O v E �t';t, //.� Ig A bbyS 4 FLOORS i t71,514 S.F. O W 0 -.,READ.(:2537 SF) _., 1 , ..,. /,/ q 6'4.4 ^^ ._/,.. ^. 't' :\ :.... / f` K' 11 v,„ 1'£1i IN�HIE .' I OFFICE(1-3) i t54,248 S.F. ) 2 p� O Z , % ,e t'T `� rkt N �,.1'"a r) ,, 1 3$'�31w'- " ° " coxa wALI; '• 'I�� GARAGE I ±17,266 SF• . 0 vU W 1.11 � - '* / n SIEfi-51111 EJvi051 ' rePiI OFFICE COVERAGE- •�`' CC �.5' - �. I I— FAR W/0 GARAGE 42%GROSS SITE - ' • •(..._....... / \ � � t Y.��.. ' � / � Ifwi/BRoau{. � I 1 Iw 56R NET SITE z a "" :.:- '�`:....,.. ''� '., -+v Exins-D'•. 1 (� TOTAL PARKING 194 STALLS ♦ �w \` ' ., �- ,'� so 33 MORENA>� 1 I 12 SITE PARKING 164 STALLS I �� T CONCL w P GARAGE PARKING 30 STALLS P. 1. !;:.... ,10.2}.,`.'.. /':,:�,•1 vi lit., �'r �'ud' i 7 �- i• ROCKERY _ .q �" �s ''E I SEE ML I 1 i SUB-TOTALS 128 REGULAR STALLS �:, z ` { < 4aI I I t I I t I I „ 9 I •Li B'.20'-(INCL�'-OH} - GARAGE F.F.-172' .•\C 4 /ujhf"CA s !SLOPE P Q • al, + I I 60 COMPACT STALLS ARCHITECTURE i (1 ` ` `'','t\ OFFFFICEAF.F -27.8' \ M lt' '�: m ,j SURFACE UP \ TIP.LONPA`1— 8.5"x16'(30%MAX.) and PLANNING 1\ SET POND• ♦ E,1. iI 70 TOP OF \• i��t °4��.q:•tA I C.1P.a: � ••�srAue�6'`wJ. I (58 STALLS MAIL) 11 SFE AWL \,\•`'\`'•.':,` �. vir 741. .." IBY 16'L Q �,A }n_; \` AREA _241 yD// •.�..�IIIIIIttl(' 1 \•. \L ((�"°-1 RELOCATED 6 ACCESSIBLE STALL) RO i em AVESOUTHEAST e...'1 1/A-21 .K EA�'��'—t--- JD FM 1_'�- ' I INQ_1 VAN STALL MERCER ISLAND.WA.MOO ^� ,tt; '` .., K@'JYB a t6 �,'+ �' !I I sTAil W. I TREE ''// 3061]YLbddB fA%2N}bd•] COSTING Bloc. 'w '1; It �/��Tk$�" i"` � .r , fah a BY •'-`-a a62/lo0o S.F.sF OFFICE ON ADJACENT PROPERTY 'I, '' \' ,_.__......_-r I ,.'I .,:';I), " ► � '. L�d1,4t l U 1 '�11 1 r';; ''RR /.:=�',:',. �' P LAB 1TE`/; IMPERVIOUS AREAS ,i,,,..44.. . /'/ ��s /! -'/�"'- ��!$93��C91'.S�'�.RI�1.����>$i'dTL''�--�s�`���'•K F .'MNIN$i � •b, I F PARKING& - / ...._...".__ 9SK�a ���� ( AIL a " h� I ' MANEUVERING f54,754 S.F. ROCKERY PER 4. 1' ..... // :/ h5a ,.,:� / gE 4 ALT1• ,� " �� ill 1 WALKS PLAZA f 5,322 S.F. aNL ORARANCS •}, -'...--1...''' .I t '�;l r/,r • �� ° 4i2C 4T+. '�„n e„O,!1;s2 tA�(D f'•._ + 1 I / :t�,r," ..'.'�' !f •� f IJI �+�. c •,.` �au>P.S'�. =`u3�u'lC,' ' �2 1 ":AP.G�.j ��i' :I I I ROOF AREA 319,190 S.F. •' cm. 1'. 1 I I _ N DN OSm C .: �Q ^ CONON/J1�C .� i r � I ' 1 1`•' /�j� / '/•!Y� FlN/TiP(.CON ,I =�' ::) ONaE✓�AMK`... .gD�� ,-�- DFSLRIPII DATE NEW 9DLYLWC 2'MIME t 0 1 r TON / I 1 o I / .(r{G;r 1 ....._..._QV 1µ...__... _ �,. L/................-�I......... Abel so.,_[, LI . ! 1 15 ,':r•}/I IATE T 0 1 TO ISLAND TE REVISION w .. .. �' I1‘4 � BLOC.DEFT.CORM. �-.,,-JO .: ?a.... ....1:-...: -.. .... / •-1 ............•A....._._._ �,,. RENSIONS 5-31 00 ._..-_.. �,•,1. ,('22' "`TYP^k,WDSCAPE.AREA__... 1 RID SET 6 08 00 ———— —— :_•1:b'..7r'1i�F11 t`I�.#i j.i i ?t;H. ——— ] P f (—1 - i^f-1fi#"'£9:� 2.9 E 410.'F't ?^J/t c+t !tAPE AREA v1 .}' },I'# G#-t-1� ——— A REVsaNs 7-1T- \ t I�'` '\ N 89'26'2Y E 41Q01( LANDSCAPE AREA 00 CONSTRUCTION SET 7-12-00 \\T--USING CURB CUT 1 C B TPA. R-EXISTING CURB MING STREET 20'WOE P(1R710k—U' aii LIGHT.TIP. CF VACATED INDUS ST. • d ...sW.18TH-STREer-._...._ ..931811...9 TURN LANE...---'--.._. ._��_.._._..__..__........_.. SITE PLAN 5 la Ta ir 15/A-22 SEE CAL F11e:99044/405-A2.DWG p WATER NEfERo o 1N 20 40 err „CAL1 JOB NO.: Y O44 SKEET NO OF: DOMING CURB CUT 1,2U• mom: DATE _ H-24-09 DRAWN: RAJ A-2 •• SITE PLAN 20' 1 CHECK: 1TM 06/05/01 10:29 FAX 2062306647 ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 10 001 • ARCHITECTURE&PLANNING, INC. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF RENTON ROYCE A.BERG,A.I.A., PRINCIPAL PHONE: (206)230-6648 3003 80TH AVENUE SOUTHEAST JU�I ® 5 LUU FAX: (206)230-6647 MERCER ISLAND,WA 98040 RECEIVED MUM MEMORANDUM VIA FAX AND MAIL TO: Lesley Nishihira DATE: June 5, 2001 City of Renton PROJECT: South 405 Place TIME: 10:12 AM PROJECT NO: 99044 RE: Permit#B000242 Leslie, We would like to submit this site plan exhibit for your records. During construction 3 trees were relocated from the original approved site plan. There is no reduction in the total number of trees or amount of landscaping. If you have any questions or comments lease give us a call. Rocky A. Jones Project Manager LPN Architects • c.c. Craig Burnell, City of Renton Rebecca Davidson,JCR Development Eric Jones, Foushee &Associates Royce A. Berg, LPN Architects Lauchlin Bethune, Landscape Architect encl. , •• 4 07, A---I-405 FFAF_EWAY--A ,101!`...1 TOO ft1i t_111/ST- 0 . Cf PO 191 7.1n1,-0.7-147‘: ( , 101.111.0:PtiTT.0....'_/...• U. TE PAY 3311111AWJ0-11 RELOCA 2 TREES .,.._„--..-•,-,..,....,, yil3311 112718 S9 ..._..,-, 108E10.STEFOR AMA ;ir totabi -, •'-'"-'''' - 0 TO ISLANDS AT EAST SR WOW .1./101CIPE KO. -8.1.511 a RECT0E /--, PDX ly::.22i12 ,-....................._,---•- 01111ELRLLOCATI71 raJVTDISE1001 SIDE OF PARKING AREA it.sc„.,.ig .,,.. Kit' .4._ 82E 3/A-21 , .4/e& u• _ ----------- 1 1-4 CRST112 ONW.134 - [1•114' ----7-7.-----7-_7:----.7.•3.--="7:-_,. .-„,-:-.-.,v,-_________ _1 16-11/i1a s tH.ecoint t _ . , - • - -.: --,..:•-•1:_ -__:::.--- ---=" ------- -'s.kM 1 , 'IQ 1\-- 1.:•,,,,,:y I t`..3 --- ..-.......IV --•-- •. . ri:P' .. CO !.."---.:7-17--;" 'ftri'•!. ". -____----- ....:.:":.'..::::•-::":..--- ,lee ',...• C C1C C C '.. 171t1•T' '7 I .11 n. • '' -•.0°11 :,-.:.:;::1..---.7•r...;•... ' 12 11...._--T -- . . \ • " • RELOCATED • :1 1 '- me tuAray • I TREE ci 1=11 II 1 1••• •• I •I i '• &Ma.. ROD Sl6WX. 07' 411 'lb* SR O1T. 61 RAY.„ TO(..-41/.... mum 5ri olo ....::::?:•::"•,;•'" , _. --a OUCH HASH-. ''' •1111.six mit ' • - •--' F•••1 ,;:-''.-:-••;-..-.:''_ --- „11;.L.a-a 1 c7 r- I . - • •• ..,/,..: i ..„ 1. .• `10:A1A71 ,z.:-.•:.2 :,...,-- '...,1"/„.....•:?, -...1..1 ,-.• • C. 1.1. ..i 1 G ..• / . .......-* ...-•.- \ ...-3,5 • - C -AL ow.t,oqi '1 „infive. .. . .T.--,-,,.•?:1: . • WU 'c• .C.4.1 v•Cni 7.,,...,..im71 121 '-- Ai. ., ig.FRIW,,j/r7L ' 1 •1 s I 'ilaa:".41 I'll IRREELOECATED na ,, .., 0 C),. WI- Illa C? z a .--- ' a i'3- z ts.5 o 05 t5.5 (.5 05 05 .F. gti.t‘i. fAfla MEI( 1 F. 1 4 . X----- -- -- - - ' - al• asp ' A•• ' , LAW' - .- o rt, u, • -. & g&• ,OM MO ' ...'‹ 11... .1- 4.-1-‘-- .....,...'fi‘..i OP,_,e, As:,• j_.-t! ...--..-.,., : u 1, . . SIR IAEA . r ni *124976 SF. ra Li-- .4 I- .----r ," "-•----.. il i• ' •I. r. MSS FiS7C./REA ."•'''''"'".--& c.i ri.- \_, 3_..g .-••,12,1/3 '1.114.11G1PE " ...I •• .145- ,•:-,.,-•- ' ,t,v4•- \cic-5,*•, Gs I \ r 1, Mt 1.101 198117. .1 ...1.,..,1.4 „X. •,,,,,..0,,s.,.,•‘.....• . ' , . I• 4 FLOORS .t71,314 SF. ' 71 Cr CRISS AKA - -...,...% ,,,,....4 _ ,„...., .. ,..„,„., -t-W- - 1 TM. •-• - :•• . ,-...,..„, -F- i '','• I' Ulla(1-3) •• 2 WA(11:37 Si) -.• ---: :-" A\'-\ 1":41., ,-1,1N, 4.-0,t‘A. 0 ' 1 i 2 a.7.,-- i - - dm.„ i e, .,._ GARAcE ;.+17,166 Sr. • .... o ..:-..,:-...sil-,"-z::.L.:-":::•-z:,. /' 10.,., ..... ._„.. . fIcl .!--:14 I/1k. ::,-„,,z ,,::.---,:..---siiiii,t,•.• • c)„Ig . '71 --' - ' 'A. T''... .i i I il Gra OYARAGE- - 1 t9 rot .-. • • •,* n 1-,U7 11/0 CAlAti 41X GRO Sra' li .,_ --.-„: _us2, . _ . „,:„ ,,j,,,,,s le ii, . . v . 1.• S571 EU SHE 7:1- • ...71--:•-•:!:...--_-_-----7-_:_,- --. ,..* \ , , ••,...f ik. ... ap . . „_....,1 . : 1 - •.... -.."..,..c,,,,". ..---•-•An.V.' ''' u . . .I 1 1.14 TOOL PARFOHO 194 STALLS A.-.---- .•"------.---- -• - ,. i -.4--,, 4y'". ' • -10.0e :,„,44 trZEit ...•-• 1 tAy.r. , • r r -15 91t PAAMIC I IS;STAUS ,.• ., 7- CARAtE PARNAC 33 STALLS VIII ...,..-• .100cITY , n • !fl OW , s i z SJD-1:11A1S 11B AMUR SIALLS I-3 _____ -Aa+-4P- '-.• •- --- • • WWI rr.-i)./ ir,10111111- ...,,, .., • ; i -.. '.- ,;•filn: :v..: 2 --STEC PA , 1 1 1 1 Sjatt110,_2.0111 60 OCISIMCF STALLS :2tIglia;itilt-N ' DI -n- ...,-: '••- 1ST NI. 11..../ ,......1---r------1--iSEEN.,- . . OP.1:0A.7,1! ElSnxt6'WEI 1.10.) ,-3 -.:,;• f r • '- •' • imi 17 -710 '6 ...,..-A.,A.,.,&4:•,',,..„ It „la ra•(t , ... (55 STALLS IMF, r-t , \ --4.077-YA4••-cfc'' lliii 1 • - I'Ll'lb Iit r7 ' RELOCATED 6 ...CM AN%I UlIWASI PZ/ - "'LIU ile7irl',%*AVAgl U-r- NEL I YAM SiALL) N3171.1.....Will DM) tri - I/-11 tr.. ,,---e.r, 0-_, . ; n - .5101-FA-I' .1 TREE irred SF.OWE 1.83Tiv.emonAs,a ..- ... 1/1. ---................. f.repo .,6 .4_ , At uf. •., tr ...1 157/IC03 SE.CF11M 1;7. 0,1111111:DIT Pa-700T • • ftT..... ..11/CRTM . .1....---& '.,1 ' •'....-. ' • . •5i1W.IEOrktiAl : :aWni'Z.: . '1 c1. .0. I LYN:BMWS Anus '.0 • % , ',.• -tTg.11.111111y i: _,.,, -%;.-. -'`,0i-5-fiatiliiiitEr%.1.1i4-37 .,.-41Ma•P• r,-*4i ' --MA:. 1 FAFIKAIG* ,:--:----;;•-•;01011.•44- ----. !•••'' ',• -- •.. I - Alr••••• -,,z14:-:..„....:.....,6,:i• i -1-. ...aigv, . ,:.,. L._....,..01 • i PAANLIALFPF2 i5L7S4 Sr. -;..-:-...7:_-,:. ..".1.:..:i4 -,•-44. , 5:4,A11110,, •sy,,r.:NIA WAYS/PLAZA OW Ef/.1A1=1 •':••;• •••/ 414 .- , 12 4/- :7•5:-.'7•a•NIWY i I MC OF& 319,10 SF• - ••:‘r-- ....-•...:---. I . t • I,' /4-474.4, • - --•17--- - .. internal ..• ti Tv •„ • ,.,IV:.,,_.,4:4, .....-6 _ --•-•..,sr.r,..,1„., .1.....int„. ... _,....„:,.... . . . 1/3 01301f101 OM C.) -T•/... -1.2TerSRAO.fr- I-1-----. 1-13- 1 1,-.5z: t , ,.----_-_-_-:---_.:.1..A.-1,.. VT.:Tr.....•41,.. ,k • -, „.." '-'A - : IIFITAMN 0.11_, 1 9T PIM NV. 2-11-/1 1613g.11.611 1-16-1/ -..:5:•,;...s_.7:.--r".".."..1=71:-_:-.:'_:,':.* .••• ...ti •1 .. , .. . • 3 A. Iv A 4--)1 I .Y.--,g3 RELOCATE TREE UM PER.1191111 7,7,-0 , ,-. . PrItIthi 3-11-01 ...*.•:•-':"'i 3 3 '' .1 !- • , .., ,..1 I TO ISLAND AT .;.::_:_- - --- •--...._--_-._ ' • st-•"- . ..7.:.W." Al , . N.E. CORNER OF BLDG. LA Eta.EM.CCUB 3-3. )--*----•- •---- \\.. - ----7-7_---:.--.---.".---.:•"-..........--.=-";71 -. :_ --------..--- r •_: conag(fifErdee• .E-782PrilKiiiSiii,"6 -- ---- liarIMOSiraTilagrtiris. ecillttOrArieFUERMeitrn",...g7• 74RWEE7MQVIMIOVITaii, 17A741111 I UN)S7JK Ai[* __ a1 TEYSEITS BO SET A ;13,5)535 5-3 7-1,-,, 0715111.0110T SET 7-11-11 it J I" 1 \-00F.110 0/18 011 iCa OAS WI IT11---// \--172011C 0118 ua...i..STF.1. ar MR art CF R51101 SR a 01ro Cr VW:1163-NaosSATE.PLAN caltnne 7,14.3,9ri -- - - -- --------- ----- - ---- ----- - ------.------ - 1 l- c: s -CA le10014 It06-A7 Ella RA CITE D 0 12 sC 5Icm / i--/ 1 -r1 03t LCO“ 141 iD.r , C81010110 0t- 0 . gC. 1.30 OAIW 641-811 iiA-L n OFIATit CAI . 2 VIE PLAN 12CY I 1 CFELAI 112.1 CITY V' RENTON ,pzu, hill. Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator March 21, 2001 Rocky Jones LPN Architects 3003 80th Avenue SE Mercer Island,WA 98040 Subject: Modification of Approved Site •Ian for South 405 Place File No. LUA-99-186, SA-A, ECF Dear Mr. Jones: This letter is to inform you that we have reviewed your proposed revisions to the South 405 Place site plan. The Zoning Administrator initially approved the site plan on February 4, 2000. The approved site plan included a 70,827 square foot office building with three stories of office over one floor of garage parking. The approved site plan included 194 on-site parking spaces, including 30 garage space ;Specifically, the proposed modifications would involve the following alterations tothe =pproved site plan: 1. Elimination of two parking spaces near the northeast corner of the building; 2. Installation of approximately 480 square feet of additional landscape area in place of the eliminated stalls; and . 3. Revision of the parking layout of he west end of the parking garage in order to create two additional parking spaces. The Site Plan regulations define a minor adj stment or modification to an approved site plan as changes which do not involve more han a 10% increase in area or scale of the development, do not have a significantly greater impact on the environment and facilities, and do not change the boundaries of the originally approved plan (RMC § 4-9- 200.H). . • The proposed modifications would result.i no net change to the amount of on-site parking approved for the project (194 spa es) and alter the amount of landscaping required for the site. The revised parki g garage layout would comply with stall dimension and circulation requirements of the parking regulations. No other modifications are proposed to the approved site plan and the overall appearance of the property would remain as approved. Therefore, the proposed revisions are approved as a minor modification to the previously approved site plan. . into. 1901 2 0OI . 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 yr::, ` This paper contains 50%recicled material.20%post consumer ilai Q SN South 405 Place Minor Modification Page 2 of 2 The applicant is advised that all code requirements, conditions of the site plan approval and mitigating measures of the Environmental Review are still applicable to the development of the site. The applicant should also understand that Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan approval may be required for future modifications to the site plan. This decision to approve the proposed revisions as a minor modification is subject to a fourteen (14) day appeal period from the date of this letter. Any appeals of the administrative decision must be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner by 5:00 pm, April 4, 2001. If you have questions regarding this correspondence, feel free to contact Lesley Nishihira at (425)430-7270. Sincerely, kierdiu6A- Neil Watts, Director Development Services Division cc: Jennifer Henning, Principal Planner Lesley Nishihira, Project Manager Yellow File Craig Burnell , Building Plan Review • • ARCHITECTURE&PLANNING, AC. DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF PFNTON MAR 2 0 2000 ROYCE A. BERG,A.I.A., PRINCIPAL PHONE: (206)230-6648 3003 MERCERF AVENUE ISLAND,WA 98040 AST RECEIVED FAX: (206)230-6647 MEMORANDUM VIA FAX AND MAIL TO: Lesley Nishihira DATE: March 16, 2001 City of Renton PROJECT: South 405 Place TIME: 4:31 PM PROJECT NO: 99044 RE: South 405 Place Renton, Washington Project #LUA-99-186, SA-A, ECF Permit#B000242 Lesley, We would like to propose removal of 2 compact parking stall locations near the N.E. corner of the building and a minor revision of some stalls on the west end of the South 405 Place Parking Garage that will yield an additional 2 stall locations. We have attached 2 exhibits that show the areas of concern. Parking total for the entire project would be unchanged. We would appreciate any comments on this proposal. Pending any concerns we will be submitting this as a revision next week. Please contact us if you have any questions. Thank You. ,/ Rocky A. J nes Project Manager LPN Architects c.c. Craig Burnell, City of Renton Rebecca Davidson, JCR Development Eric Jones, Foushee & Associates Royce A. Berg, LPN Architects encl. I F405 FREEWAY HATCH INDICATES 43,377 SF ' 1. ./i OF PARKING LOT ING AREA wO, e� PROPOSED LANDSCAPED RIN.5(2 3A SF AREA Q REO'0. 42708 ff 7 REWORD.STORAGE AREA 10'ARIUNUTA (� /7 SITE LIGHTING LANDSCAPE REQUIRED TRASH&RECYCLE `, IyI y�9� GROUP TREE POLE W/RAI a Tf OF_ LOCATION pt.•`-t I V` GRNP TO ROM CCNABV. RASE R U a ON - __-- ABV.GRADE TIP. I ufX TURNING - 1 ---] EXISC EMERGENT— OB'46'W 11.56' _....-............_. 11 .............................-_....._.__. ,r14„ter -_ • r.....::-...:).JZ-Zit.! � �` __-_-_ G D � B 7 l ,y QFT11 • ' i` '% �'- , \ • F.D.C.LOCATDN'R.I U , ;I., f: •..47i ORL SNOt ,I I O .,! :CATCH E ANAL, '' \ I •.. /i/%,",' I T1P.SEE tlNl j f� � .; THANffOR1/ER lAj I; �,/�� \LOCATON C 21 EA E :1 i 1•I FLOOD STORAGE I C� CB `a'� L 21 �``� �+��M DS tl. O SEE CIVIL , .•, FUTURE GENSET' ,D� LANDSCAPE ` " I , 'I.':i %/� • LOCATION IL C C....'.`_- •' III' I RRO NL PM TYP. CAP W O c (I .I G 3 I = ,I 4C D VAULT n D ca W Z I', ( u--- �A\R R T�E OLT 2'TYP.VEHICLE F.. I i �I OPoVEWAY I C UNE OF ,� -- �• .C l••�NIQF.ft•N` 1 11 OVERHANG 0 W O 'LI 'II:,. OVERHANG ';'/ 1 III = W TO CARAG I BELOW CARD I,�! ¢ ABOVE °� Cam. •' .. 11' : " ENTRY IC I F.H ` (�o V F Z :II 'I A -.. ..fF`� �Q%\_Gtat..e4 ♦ A I C `i .Tw �, ,;;I TABULATION p p , A ' '.,i . CUM "\)- ,‘ G�sN ° i11 I i SITE AREA t126,876 S.F. < t) 42,700 SF LANDSCAPE ° 1 T°• lf.,1. - . G`• � • � OV RI UNE ERHANG • '•I II: NET SITE AREA 395,256 S.F. CC AREA FOR HABITAT, ii;: •\:e / G�'� 5 •Ti'L "_ BOVE • 1 L Z• • ♦ .R fH.n': O'� € j Q { 4FLO371514SF. O !A F2 �'j "T DSC " u OFFICE(1-3) f54,248 S.F. _ „^ p Z � 3C�-♦ J I yAI(g�y mNe wAtx GARAGE t17,266 S.F. O (`(J?) 0 WW 4�. ✓ �. '* H PEN SPEC a Et13aCi_Ii.tome a TYP.: ,t_ CC 1a" ♦ vA ca ;I� OFFICE COVERAGE- -� y y 'E+, " ' I ", FAR W/O GARAGE 42%GROSS SITE 2 -- - wl BR 'Al 1 `\ `{I�-� tit fWISH,DgYP:'. " ;, ' I , '1w 56%NET SITE F➢ TOTAL PARKING 194 STALLS ♦ � \ ` ii��'altfu,r� WTE ° T� SITE PARKING 164 STALLS - - -♦ � • r'n CONC.wADL I GARAGE PARKING 630 STALLS �:`' '� - �� 7 -- RSEEE--aRv�` SUB TOTALS 128-REGUL-ARSTALLS—- _ I 7— ♦ / bAR 4el I I I I I11I �i I 9'K20'(INCL 2'O.H.) 'I ', '%.:� 1 GARAGE F.F:-17.2' _ '% �iW,p'�"L, c, �-sOPE P.,, " I I 60 COMPACT STALLS ARCHITECTURE 1STOFF FIR ,,/�•4g s TO TOP 8.5"K16' 30% nd PLANNING �', OFFICE F.F. -27.8' \ , \ Fe..1 2 TO TOP()i TYP.CWPACT j ( MAX)) /'� s II GAP.cum) (58 MAX) RO Y BOTH A.ER SOUTHEAST 'i, MET PIXJO A. \O I�(r•' �js�`J:• I STAR e'fi•W. STALLS SEE CIVIL . �.. `43`,♦4.4I,� BY 1fi'LONG 6 ACCESSIBLE STALLS ROYCEAtlERG.PRINCIPAL Pu7A AREA �/' {eL�91IIII I II I_ / pO LANDSC 1/AREAI � 'a'"0.� �� "L I" BY ',L 1 276 SF.OFFICE STALL) MERCER GLAND.w,.v60a r] STALL 9 W. fAdlaaaad.a rA222oadu EMSDNG BIDG� I....,.. ` •`'',`'' BY 20'.LONC 1I ON ADJACENT PRCPERTV - , ------W ��s)"t)}41'441m` . I I 3.6 00 S.F.OFFICE 1F �;I:I i.!:-;.�'i�---- I e fn �t9� w�ai:4"1E..n/ 7' " IMPERNOUS AREAS 1 , ��S?°�!�$,YRS.S������@�d`��3�i= .-. � sALqg PARKING h. �i -.... mA i�� BARiFJrfS MANEUVERING t54,754 S.F.i,.,.., ROCKERY PERI �'•':-. �, / !, ;.O 'J�R� G G � '. �: '� & � 2 /f WALKS/PLAZA t 5.322 S.F. Q❑ I MAL DRAMWGS V' (i I ,+ ;,•I a4 12 `,. # =i h`i� © +A ELI U I WALK AREA 319 122 S.F ". ' i,• • 1 i i r `I '6�"�� __. 9pDREWAIKE W/ AGGREGATE 11 �+ 'l I,1 NO DESCNP110N DAIS I n 1 1 i,I t 0 "q` : L•, ,9DEW RN,TYP. AGGR ATE LOCATII NE""'G LpC q I 'I I J i.H. I ;~ GTY NIN I' ®®LEXHIRI P I N-LE3®1 . ...::::'1..t / ,I P:0 ..... VEHICLE 5 �'I - ;�2' / ATI TD.'B 'I SITE PLAN APP. 12 20-99 ;;i:;!' I/'/ OVERHANG TIP. B /, I I 15.'I"�� CCRRECTONS I .' 'b� J s>''' y r (I BLDG.PERNIT SLID ,I, I' ,: .. .. _':,: ((($4� .: 3w I I PENSION D A ..- ..._. ry : I CCNY i p '. BLDG.BLDG DEPT. rJrw • PENSIONS 5-31-00 �,...,._........_...........- ..................._... '� � .. ..�1•±x -. �IANDSCME-AF£A.._....._._... I'•,..... SET fi-C8-00. .... MD \ rl, t4711-i-1'.1,(_1. :ii•"V.I.N. .. — .. •1 '3'� 'F'I^lshc). � 111 #—x.�L' '1::�...}`-t.-11;1;...,.:. I:�.t"t•=--- \\ -_ v LANDSCAPE AREA CONSTRUCTION SET 7-12-00 —COSTING CURB CUT -,�f• NEW CURB CUT PER SPNO CURB o—EXISTING STREET 2D ME ED THOMA OTT OF RENTON SIN. &GLITTER UDIT,TIP. OF VACATED THONAS ST. SITE PLAN — s,..._.__... __.SW 18TH'STREET d..._._...__...._..-._._.MIRING TURNLANE. — ..-...._.. >r..._........._. s 2 _ _ _ ±_ I 15/A-22 DESGNATED AREA FOR ' 5'HIDE BIKE PATH PER File:99044/405-A2.DWG j WATER IIEUp •TY OF RENTON SM. ' 20' BO• Etl 1� -- SEE a\nl Ao to " JOB NO.: 00044 SHEET NO 0<: EXISTING CURB CUT 1'.2C' 110RT1 DATE: E-24-RB d 1 } DRAWN: HAJ t SITE PLAN 20' 1 CHECK: RAJ 1 f4'-4" , /' if i /� 1-7-1.11 ' Ell Ell RELOCATED / . LIJ LIS WATER METERS e 1, , , \� LANDSCAPE I .1 DRAIN . I I AREA 'N IL RELOCATE 1 2 STALLS �>•���s ' CHAINLINK *� I FENCE, +42" SEE PARKING _ •""; ` `' , I MIN. , GARAGE 1• F.D./ �� ffir EXHIBIT 1 ` DELETE VALi T AND c, i ' �` NEW I'� RELOCATE D- D.C.V.A. z �o/,-ram \DRAIN ' '• TO SPRINKL R RM. 1 gigNI \ROCKERY WALL LO o SPRINKLER 5 , PER CIVIL AG. 1.1 ROOM - \-,, `. c J GO7 C �. M1 \ I \ i.� U , z X IA}I . RELOCATED`OIL WATER'",f , ' SEPARATOR OC.�� X 410 ��rCD' ;► C� • m .1', 14' ,� ,, LANDSCAPEPI I 1 I AREA TYP. Ps \, .' • / \ • \ • • / ., OPEN GAR PARKING ; \ \; o a NORTH G01 - PARTIAL SITE / GAR GE PLAN 10' BULLETIN' Project: SOUTH 405 PLACE ki , .i N �z A R C.H I T E C T U R E Subject: REVISED NE CORNER REI4jf and PLANNING /� �+ ROYCE A.BERG.PRINCIPAL' Project No.:99044 DOte;8-24-00 By: RAJ 3003-BOTH AVE SOUTHEAST MERCER ISLAND,WA.98040i Rey: 10-q0-00 1206)230-6648 FAX 230-66471 405-A2r3.dwg 11/16/2000 10.49 an Rev: 3-02-01 Sheet 1 OF 1 I .... • ,..."' - 2- :: . . . , '' i ! I sm . In , .1 - ..-. , 1^Z,, - ^ I '' iim mmni II -, --------==_-=.---_-=--- \ ,----f---4--,mom' os i ___..--- -- ________ ,.., ..... ,:___44 ,+. \ ' 1,---- - ,. "---,—.A — Ni , ! „ '1 1 l• I - !, . ' , . ` •I ril \\/ I ii • I` „ , I ' I if .1 • i' , I . ' -1 ,-. ' - . • i 1 k A . 1.-6i,I .\ , \ 23.-0° TfP. r \ \ , . , . ..„ 4 .„ ,,,,, . ,„, , .i, •In 17'-0" . b IN ONE WAY -0 \--- . . • \t— • 4-, O STRIPE b 41 , " . , . '•eli?, 6, ..I. , 1 . 9' . N . . , . ,t, '. 3 c.‘' . 4. •Jt` IO ‘0. . If ! tr) r24” DIA. •, ,I.'. . b CONC. COL. • / 0 niii b , • TYPICAL b b)41 4 '6' 0 i.,, ' .• 1 (//, _ •- ...,. 1 ONE WAY i 'co I op- ---------_- _ I r's cL 13Vc11133 10Vd1100 _ - Nk- ,..,: 6' 16.-0" 8.-4" 8.-4 8.-4' 8.I-4' / / • 1 I I , . " • • '*.\\'• 1 . STRUCTURED PARKING — 90' STANDARD 8'!-4” x 16'-0” MIN. EXISTING 30 STALLS COMPACT 7'-4" x 13'-0” MIN. ADDED 2 STALLS • NORTH PARTIAL GARAGE PLAN 1/16" • . . . BULLETIN Project: SOUTH 405 PLACE . • 4j 0 il V 2,,,i li h 1 trEi. 3 a N A CHILECTU E Subject: GARAGE PARKING - WEST END and PLANNING ROYCE A.BERG.PRINCIPAL Project No.:99044 Date13-16-01 By: RAJ 3003-80TH AVE SOUTHEAST MERCER ISLAND,WA.98040 (206)230-6648 FAX 230-66471 405-a3.1A/G 09/18/2000 08,44 an Sheet 3 OF 3 - DEVELOPMEM p�NNll', ' ARCHITEC cU TURE&PLANNIN ,INC. CITY OF RE�ON -` DEC 18 2000 qq-/e&ry pn CE A. BERG,A.I.A., PRINCIPAL RECEIVED PHONE: (206)230-6648 3003 80TH AVENUE SOUTHEAST FAX: (206)230-6647 MERCER ISLAND,WA 98040 1 MEMORANDUM VIA FAX AND MAIL 1 ' TO: Lesley Nish'ihira~s DATE: December 13, 2000 City Of Rento`n PROJECT: South 405 Place TIME: 11:17 AM PROJECT NO: 99044 RE: Permit# B000242 1 1 Per our phone conversation on Friday December 8th: The bike lane shown on our site plan, along .W. 16 ' Street will not be required. This note was a Site Plan Approval advisory corn ent that did not reflect the existing conditions of the S.W. 16th Street curbing an lane layout. The city does not want the existing drive lane width reduced. Thank you, I Rocky A. Jolnes Project Manager LPN Architects c.c. Craig Burnell, City of Renton Rebecca Davidson, JCR Development Eric Jones, Foushee &Associates Royce A. Berg, LPN Architects `ench . .. ' .. ..... .- ., _ . _. _ _ t . ii • MIN; il , 1 .. io ; 18' I ', 241/ ; 1 1,.., 18'/ •1 .•- \ \ 001_i .—I —I I f:' \' i ; 1-..'.. I) 0) , X . . i1 /; .' 'tt.- i— —I ,. • M "...11'• / ., CD M .!:{. . '•.' .1-11 • \ „2- , .• ;t:::•;..:=i,,''. . ON(t3 -- /1 ,I. ... : • , /1 . :q,.. - .. 03 %;:;.'..•:....•t. r-- ,,),?-1:,' .'i•k--R","%d.:4_-4,1 i --- ,,soligiNg I i / cf) t w".: •:Flits. • 011121 S 1W ‘-.• i i:.• _ ti0- 011,04.0440; 1 1 M :P.• , . / • I I --(/) tiPi... Cl) I 7z) • A.Atie,40:4410044r4g.lit„441.:.' > I- .., \ '.v. 411:WirOltartti PA 01PAIrdit.4617 H.. 1 ‘,. i \; -,',',•\-1``,\\ HCCH i HC .LIL CD 1 1 Z > Z m . .1... ! ', •• '[.,\::: '' ---- . 74.7,,,,•-•- rn m ii —I I *----0 ...r . • ____. ------ ,20) ,=.7.,.. = I •••• • ------ , : [ e ! —-------.--_-_, Cl) 1 • .,.... i i 18' . . ../ _1 A: i j " f , .. : 7 16' ,. "•••,,, ------,„ D3 I • / X M -.I• I (-) ..,.,...„...., Z co 0 .• '; ; • ---- 19. i r,,,:•;:-1 ...._, M --I m - ,T.:•-• ` -- • a) 1•••` .\.1 ----- .1 1 •: . I; • 3 "5:•---"4-li.`‘ ‘,I 0 ,•,- M 13 1 *.:i. I I is-`vi •-'-'77‘7 )0 > 1 1:D-016];_ ,k•I m . . . c. :2,6_ „ ( ---______... I ,.,, ...,,, .• , \ ,\,;.-1 .7' 15' 12' 15' , ..1 \ , . \• A / / ,- . \\ \ .',...... \\ . 1 \ ,,•7 ,•, . -_,..... 1 - ul[•• „-N. - .;I'--4;::: :•4::=':•';`,..=---":"- ' ''71:* i i ::•;`,::: ;:‘, 3:6 Ii.": / k`.a,,s;;;, ,s,,,,n:;:,. ___..--•••-a--,•----------1 ----_____0, 0 0 ,.:;•,, .:•': •`,;:.•:; GO73 1! '•-•'• 7- _h•-'-`-"-\--‘-‘•=-----_-_-_,- ("----- --/m----.':)._ .2-;;L___,W51'.1'''''` ..------ 4 ... CI I r I BULLETIN' Project: SOUTH 405 PLACE ARCHITECTURE Subject: EXISTING STREEi - 57 and PLANNING • ROYCE A.BERG.PRINCIPAL( Project No.:99044 Date111-14-00 By: RAJ 3003-80TH AVE SOUTHEAST MERCER LSLAND,WA.98040 Rev: 12-13-00 (206)230-6648 FAX 230-6647 405-A2r3.dwg 11/16/2000 10149 am Sheet OF 1 1 1 . �1 ., � � .- CITY ,sF RENTON .,LL \ Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator • • February 23, 2000 Ms. Rebecca Davidson John C. Radovich Development Company 2000—124th Avenue NE, B-103 Bellevue, WA 98005 SUBJECT: South 405 Place Office Building Project No. LUA-99-186,SA-A,ECF Dear Ms. Davidson: This letter is to inform you that the comment and appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed. This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures and Site Plan Conditions of Approval. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at(425)430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: Susan McLeod, Stuart Ness, Steven Ness/Owners FINAI 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 ::hi:•iiiiiii>]iii:•}i:::•iiiiii:•i:iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii:•iiYiiiiii:hiiiiii:•::v:•i:^i:•iiiiiiiiiiiiii ii:iiS:iiiii:iiiiiii:•••:E•..•••..••..+""""•"""::"""""" " ' ii:iii:iiiiiiiiiiiiiii:iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii:Jiii:::iii:::iiii:i::45> ii PVIOPREN :i::?»::'.:':.):::::::.Y•:::::::::: i>i:: ii:i i5ii: "u S :: ':: :' i i'riii::: i:ii::i:. ri :: 'r ? � ii?i>�ji::yj:: ::•i:•ii;i}iiiiiiii>:ii:::^:h:•ii:•i:•iii:::iiiiiiiiiiiii::ii:iiiiiiii::iiiii:i:vi::i:•i:i::iiiiiiiiiiiiii:iiiii:::::::::::::::.:. ::;::::.»:.>::>::::::::::::»::::::>::>;:::::::::»:::::>;::::::>:>;»>::»::>:.;:.>::>:::::::::::::::::>::»:::>i:::<AFI=IDAVIT b►.F..S arC .. .....IVI .. On the 4 daiof -rd,ovuacki-LI 2000, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing c-4s 1rv, documents. This information was sent to: Name pp Representing Peac occa inn 3O1V1v1 d a U 1.6) U U. SuL&-v1 Mgl_u_od f S�uav Ness I S-euty\ S • (Signature of Sender) Stoskd eo k Se- er • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that tS74 ,(‘ 4-0- signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for tl T uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: �- /Y- D 0 'YYl . ` a -n , MARILYN KAMCHEFF Notary Pub is i and for the State of W — gton NOTARY PUBLIC Notary (Print) MARILYN KAMCHEFF STATE OF WASHINGTON ` My appointment at NTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 29,2003 Project Name: SoObi 405 Place- Oric__. (� Project Number: Lop‘ (s(o Scpv —W NOTARY2.DOC , REPORT City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works DECISION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW& ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION REPORT DATE: February 1, 2000 I Project Name: , South 405 Place Office Building Applicant: John Radovich Development Company Owner: Susan McLeod, Stuart Nless, Steven Ness I File Number: LUA-099-186 SA-A, EC i Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Description: Proposal to construct a 70,827 sq. ft. office building with three stories of office over one floor of garage parking. Access to the site would be from one driveway off of pSW 16th Street. A total of 197 parking stalls are proposed, including 31 garage spaces. There is a wetland area approximately 1,850 sq. ft. in size, located in the northwest corner of the site. The wetland report states it is a Category 3 wetland and hydrologically isolated and therefore exempt from City wetland regulations. The applicant proposes to use the wetland area as a flood storage pond. Project Location: 900 SW 16th Street I Exist. Bldg. Area: N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area: 70,827 sq. ft. I Site Area: r_ 2.9 acres Total Building Area: 70,827 sq. ft. -"'iL_ °�..., ' 'N % e e xan 1'45�•.v z�I C _ IND1/9TI11AL 'Y'1: EI Li j am'I . . v C N G { (— S, i1 e 7 - i ,. Q �rar' I - ~ I 1 L i A� .. .. ,rn — • CJ � y 7—era° r--ra:_-- a g S i � frrgpp,,, t 'IFoa y;�' :pj4 \,: s. ---':\ t I ' I Ia�AY'.c.� m \i� I�fil I T I � J ra , art 4:6 sw;e.Hst, ., . I I:= l'i �0 Wes'f%it_I _. r... I i�; P' 8_ rips/° �5 I. _;..- ...... . ICE: '/Cp�(.tENCIA``.w:� a ;.I 'I I ' I�I. s vw j 10 FIC� -���� L ....I. o7i_._ -.___ I:1'f G • ...1�7 n wD 1 _ 'I •� IF I�. —M`..44 c� r:4.1. F.,,o ,M ` ;sly-11+I - {L: II�� --va��.-a..— S� w " I �.a :I' �.•:•:.-� g+ !r 1 VICINITY MAP p y ,I 1 1. ,i,i J11I - , 1 -r . gip- .�`"_r, .. I NEIGHBORHOOD MAP it �I..-. Project Location Map ! - - SITERC City of Renton P/B/PW Department iinistrative Site Plan Approval&Environment Dview Committee Staff Report SOUTH 405 PLACE OFFICE BUILDING LUA-99-186,SA-A,ECF REPORT OF FEBRUARY 1,2000 Page 2 of 13 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant seeks Site Plan Approval and Environmental Review to construct a 70,827 sq. ft. office building with three stories of office over one floor of garage parking. Access to the site would be from one driveway off of SW 16th treet. A total of 197 parking stalls are proposed, including 3;1 garage spaces. There is aiwetland area, approximately 1,85 1 sq. ft. in size, located in the northwest corner of the site. The wetland report states it is a Category 3 wetland and hydrologically isolated and therefore exempt from City wetland regulations. The applicant proposes to use the wetland area as a flood storage pond. PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following project environmental review addresses only those; project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the p-oposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: 1. Earth Impacts: The applicant submitted a geotechnical report prepared by Earth Consultants, Inc! (dated March 16, 1999) that was prepared for a previous building proposal on the subject site. A cover letter submitted with the geotechnical report states that the recommendations of the previous report are applicable to the proposed office building presently under consideration. The site is relatively flat with less tha 4 feet of elevation change across the site. The site; elevation is presently 3 to 6 feet lower than SW 16th Street. The proposed floor elevations for the parking level of the tuilding are 16.8 to 17.8 feet, approximately 3 feet below the street elevation. The environmental checklist estimates an approximate fill quantity of 5,320 cubic yards. The geotechnical report concludes that the proposed structure should be supported on augercast piles. Although deep borin explorations were not conducted for the current building footprint, the report states that only the pile lengths would vary from those anticipated in the referenced study. The geotechnical report also addresses site preparation, site drainage, excavations and slopes, pavement areas, slab-on-grade floors, etc. The site would be stripped of existing vegetation and graded for asphalt and building areas. Erosion could occur during t�e construction phase of the project. Potential erosion impacts would be mitigated by City Code requirements for approval of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) and a Construction Mitigation Plan and prior to issuance o Construction Permits. SITERC.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department iinistrative Site Plan Approval&Environmenl )view Committee Staff Report SOUTH 405 PLACE OFFICE BUILDING LUA-99-186, SA-A,ECF . REPORT OF FEBRUARY 1, 2000 Page 3 of 13 Staff recommends that the applicant pe required to follow the recommendations of the geotechnical report prepared by Earth Consultants, Inc. (dated March 16, 1999) with regard to any site disturbance, pr paration, or development activities. Mitigation Measures: The applica t shall follow the recommendations of the geotechnical report prepared by Earth Consultants, Inc. (dated March 16, 1999) with regard to any site disturbance, prepar tion, or development activities. Nexus: Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance, Environmental (SEPA) Ordinance 2) Water Impacts: A wetlands report has been ubmitted by B &A Inc. identifying a 1,850 square foot wetland in the northwest corner o the site. The report describes the wetland as an excavated area that has been filled, and therefore the wetland is occurring on top of fill material. The report classifies the wet and as a Category 3 wetland that is hydrologically isolated and therefore exempt from City wetland requirements. In this case, impacts to the wetland would not require compensation and the required wetland buffers would not apply. The applicant proposes to use the wetland area as a flood storage pond. Surface water flows presently sheetflow into the existing wetland and then exit the site to the north out of the wetland and into a constructed open drainage channel. The open channel conveys surface water flows rom east to west and eventually flows into a large underground vault east of Oakesdal Avenue SW. Water is then pumped from the underground vault under Oakesdale Avenue SW and eventually released into the Springbrook Creek. The wetland on the site is considered hydrologically isolated because surface flows exit to a an-made drainage channel that flows to an underground vault before being pump d for release to Springbrook Creek. Stormwater runoff from the develop d site would be collected in a combined wet pond/detention pond located in the sobthwest corner of the site, and then released into a flood compensation pond. The natural discharge point would remain unchanged. The stormwater facility would be required to meet the design standards of the King County Stormwater Design Manual as adopte by the City. Approximately one-half the site is loca ed below the floodplain elevation of 16.58 feet. A portion of the site is going to be filled, raising the elevation above the current floodplain ele l ation. The applicant proposes to compensate for this loss of volume in the floodplain by excavating in the north est corner of the site. The applicant provided flood storage compensation calculate ns in their Technical Information Report, Section 4.3. Staff concurs with the calculation for the flood storage pond volume. Mitigation Measures: No further mitig tion is recommended. Nexus: NA 3) Fire Protection Impacts The proposal would add ne construction to the City which would potentially impact the City's Fire Department. A Fire Mitigation Fee applies to all new construction. The required mitigation fee is base on a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. For the proposed devel pment the fee is estimated at $36,830.04 (70,827 square feet X $0.52 = $36,830.04). The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. SITERC.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department ainistrative Site Pl.n Approval&Environmeni !view Committee Staff Report SOUTH 405 PLACE OFFICE BUILDING LUA-99-186,SA-A,ECF • REPORT OF FEBRUARY 1,2000 Page 4 of 13 Mitigation Measures The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at $36,830.04. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. Policy Nexus Fire Mitigation Fee Res lution and adopting Ordinance, SEPA Ordinance. 4) Transportation Impacts Access to the office buildin is proposed from a single driveway entering off SW 16th Street. A Traffic Impact Analysis has been p epared for the proposal by Christopher Brown & Associates. The report identifies c rrent and future levels of service (LOS) at the intersections of SW 16th Street and Lind Ave. S and Oakesdale Ave. SW with and without the proposed project. The re ort also estimates traffic mitigation fees based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual. The report concludes that the proposal would not alter levels of service on the arterial syst m in the morning or evening peak hours. The report recommends a Transportation Management Plan (TMP) to encourage transit and cart pool use and then suggests that implementation of a TMP would reduce the number of vehicle trips generated by the proposal. Transportation and Plan Review staffs do not concur with the methodology or concl sions of the report regarding traffic generation. The proposal would result in an increa a in traffic trips and therefore would be subject to the City's Transportation Mitigation Fe . The Transportation Mitigation Fee is calculated to be $75 per each average daily trip ttributable to the project. City staff estimates the number of traffic trips based upon th ITE Manual. For the office use, staff estimates 821 new average daily trips for a traffic mitigation fee of $61,575.00. Staff maintains that using the rates as specified in th ITE Manual is the most consistent and accurate method for determining traffic generation numbers. The applicant has submitted a Construction Mitigation Plan which describes hauling and transportation routes to the site. The Construction Mitigation Plan states that construction would be performed between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. In order to limit the impact of trucking activities during peak traffic periods, truck hauling hours are limited to between 8:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. under the Development Guidelines Ordinance. Mitigation Measures The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is estimated at $61,575. This fee is paytble prior to issuance of Building Permits. Policy Nexus: Environmental Ordinance, Transportation Mitigation Fee Ordinance 5) Land and Shoreline Use Impacts: The City Council approved rezoning the site from Medium. Industrial (IM) to Commercial Office (CO) in January 999. Office uses (administrative headquarters, professional, medical and dental) are ermitted as primary uses in the CO zone. The subject site is surrounded by Medium Industrial zoned properties and properties are mostly developed with warehouse/dis ribution uses. The proposed use is not expected to have an adverse impact on existing uses in the vicinity. The subject property is more than 00 feet from Springbrook Creek and therefore outside jurisdiction of the Shoreline M nagement Program. Mitigation Measures No further mitigation is recommended. I Policy Nexus NA. SITERC.doc City of Renton P/B/P14 Department dnistrative Site Plan Approval&Environmenl ?view Committee Staff Report SOUTH 405 PLACE OFFICE BUILDING LUA-99-186, SA-A,ECF • REPORT OF FEBRUARY 1, 2000 Page 5 of 13 B. Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON- SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. X Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. Mitigation Measures 1. The applicant shall follow the recomme Iodations of the geotechnical report prepared by Earth Consultants, Inc. (dated March 16, 1999) with regard to any site disturbance, preparation, or development activities. 2. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at $36,830.04. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay a T affic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is estimated at $61,575. This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. • SITERC.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department ninistrative Site PI n Approval&Environmen ,eview Committee Staff Report SOUTH 405 PLACE OFFICE BUILDING LUA-99-186,SA-A,ECF REPORT OF FEBRUARY 1,2000 Page 6 of 13 i Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental info mation provided in conjunction with the environmental etermination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. FIRE 1. The preliminalry fire flow is 2500 GPM, which requires one hydrant within 150 feet of the building and two additional hydirants within 300 feet of the building. The design as shown is not acceptable. 2. An approved fire sprinkler and standpipe system shall be installed throughout the structure. 3. An approved fire alarm system shall be installed throughout the structure. 4. Fire department apparatus access is required within 150-feet of all points on the building. An approved on- site fire department apparatus turnaround is require and is acceptable as shown on the site plan. Access roadways are required to be a minimum of 20-fee wide with 25-feet inside and 45-feet outside turning radius. All oni site roadways shall be painted and sig ed per City fire lane ordinance. PLAN REVIEW Water 1. The Water System Development Connection Charges $14,336.99. 2. A looped water• main is required. The required fire flow is 2500 gpm per the Fire Prevention Department. The proposed 8-inch dead end water main can only d liver 1250 gpm of fire flow. 3. The primary fire hydrant is to be within 150-feet of the structure, but not closer than 50 feet. 4. Construction drawings to meet City of Renton Drafting Standards. Storm/Surface Water 1. The Storm System Development Connection charge is $0.129 per square foot of new impervious surface area, but not less than $385. Based on the Environmental Review submittal the storm drainage connection charge is $9,721.31. 2. Vertical profile of retention pond facilities to be shown on construction plans. 3. Use NAVD 1988 datum for elevations. 4. Please indicate the vertical datum for all elevations. The T.I.R. report states the FEMA 100-year flood elevation is 16.58,which we assume is in the datum NAVD 88 (same as the plans). This is incorrect. The FEMA map in the report shows a floodplain elevation of 16.00 (NGVD 29) which converts to El. 19.58 (NAVD 88). We believe the elevation 16.58 that is being used in the report comes from the City hydraulic/hydrologic model which more accurately computes the 100-year flood elevation. The City requires the finished floor elevation to be 1.0 foot above the FEMA 100-year flood elevation of 19.58 (NAVD 88), or 20.58 (NAVD 88). This must be demonstrated on the project drawings prior to the issuance of construction permits. Compensatory storage is calculated using the elevation from the City's model for the 100-year, future condition,flow that is 16.58 (NAVD 88). Applicant must verify compliance with FEMA Nation I Flood Insurance Program Requirements regarding finished floor of a parking garage set below the FEMA 100-year flood elevation of 19.58 (NAVD 88). Please provide a drawing showing the pre- and post-developed drainage paths as well as a time of concentration calculation sheet, clearly showing your methodology and any assumptions. We question the pre-and post-developed peak flows In the detention sizing calculations. Why is the time of concentration of 10 minutes the same for both the pre- and post-developed condition? Based on the existing site description (lightly forested with light underbrush and the accompanying photographs) the pre- developed Tc should be longer than 10 min. and certinly not equal the post-developed Tc. In addition, a Tc of 10 min. for post-development seems too long given the majority of the flow path is pipe flow. Please revisit. Final plan set will need to include a detention pond and storm drain profile showing all utility crossings. The conveyance system design and analysis must incude hydraulic gradient calculations. 5. The hydraulic gradient computations for the convey nce system design don't include any analysis of the SITERC.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department iinistrative Site Pia Approval&Environment. ?view Committee Staff Report SOUTH 405 PLACE OFFICE BUILDING LUA-99-186, SA-A,ECF REPORT OF FEBRUARY 1,2000 Page 7 of 13 pipe segment between CB4 to CB3. Wastewater 1. The Sewer Syistem Development Connection (SDC) Charge is $0.078 per gross square feet, but not less than $850. The SDC charge is $9,896.33. 2. If the project;produces fats, oil, or grease, then an appropriate removal system will be required per plumbing code. 3. Side sewer line to have a 2% slope to property line. 4. Side sewer to have a cleanout five (5')feet out from the building and every 100-feet thereafter. 5. A sewer backflow prevention device is required for tl!e sewer line only when the floor elevation is below 25 feet. Transportation 1. A new 5 foot wide sidewalk is required along SW 16th Street. 2. A minimum of a 5 foot wide planter strip is required b tween the curb and sidewalk. AIRPORT The proposed construction is situated within the 179 foot maximum elevation area surrounding the airport. PLANNING 1. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection oints shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. PARKS 1. A 5-foot wide striped and signed bike lane is required on SW 16th Street, as identified in the Trails Master plan. 2. All landscaping outside of property lines is to be mairtained by the owner. PART THREE: ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION - REPORT & DECISION This decision on the administrative land use action is Made concurrently with the environmental determination. A. Type of Land Use Action x Site Plan Review Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Conditional Use Binding Site Plan Special Permit for Grade &Fill Administrative Code Determination B. Exhibits The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No! 1: Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, environmental review and other documentation pertinent to this request. SITERC.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department iinistrative Site Pi n Approval&Environment wiew Committee Staff Report SOUTH 405 PLACE OFFICE BUILDING LUA-99-186,SA-A,ECF , REPORT OF FEBRUARY 1,2000 Page 8 of 13 Exhibit No; 2: Drawing No. Al, Site Plan (Received December 22, 1999). Exhibit No! 3: Drawing No. A2, Floor Plans, Garage level, 1st and 2nd floors, (Received December 22, 1999). Exhibit No 4: Drawing No. A3, Floor Plans, 3rd and 4th Floors (Received December 22, 1999). Exhibit No. 5: Drawing No. A4, Building Elevations (Received December 22, 1999). Exhibit No! 6: Drawing No. L1.1, Landscape Ian, (Received December 22, 1999). i Exhibit No! 7: Drawing No. C1, Cover Sheet, Vicinity Map, (Received December 22, 1999). Exhibit No! 8: Drawing No. C2, Grading an Storm Drainage Plan, (Received December 22, 1999). Exhibit No. 9: Drawing No. C3, Sanitary Se er and Watermain Extension Plan, (Received December 22, 1999). Exhibit No. 10: Drawing No. C4, Constructi•n Notes and Details (Received December 22, 1999). Exhibit No. 11: Drawing No. 1 of 1, Tree Cu ting/Land Clearing Plan (Received December II 22, 1999). C. Consistency with Site Plan Criteria In reviewing the proposal with respect to the site Plan Approval Criteria set forth in Section 4- 31-33(D) of the Site Plan Ordinance, the following issues have been identified by City Departmer tal Reviewers and Divisional Reviewers: 1. GENERAL CRITERIA: A. COINFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ITS ELEMENTS AND POLICIES; The subject site is located within the Employment Area-Valley (EAV) designation of the Comprehensive Plan. The EAV designation i intended to provide for a mixture of commercial, office, and industrial uses. The proposed office use is within the range of uses anticipated for the designation. The subject site is surrounded mostly by industrial warehouse type uses. The proposed office use would be compatible with existing surrounding uses. Policy LU-7212.1 Develop the Renton Valley and the Black River Valley areas as a place for a range and variety of commercial, office, and industrial uses. Policy LU-212.2 Compatible and related land uses should be encouraged to locate in proximity to one another. The site plan for the office proposal incorporates a number of elements which are consistent with the EAV Comprehensive Plan policies lis ed below. Policy LU J212.19 Street trees and landscape g should be required for new development within the Valley to provide an attractive streetscape in areas subjected to a transition of land uses. Policy LUW212.20 When more intensive new uses are proposed for locations in close proximity to less intensive existing uses, the responsibility for mitigating any adverse impacts should be the responsibility of the new use. Policy LU7291. Beautification and screening of parking lots should be encouraged through appropriate landscaping, fencing and berms. (Community Design policies) SITERC.doc i City of Renton P/B/PW Department iinistrative Site PI n Approval&Environment Mew Committee Staff Report SOUTH 405 PLACE OFFICE BUILDING I LUA-99-186, SA-A,ECF . REPORT OF FEBRUARY 1,2000 Page 9 of 13 B. CONFORMANCE WITH EXISTING LAND USE REGULATIONS; The City Council approved rezoning the site rrom Medium Industrial (IM) to Commercial Office (CO) in January 1999. Office uses (administrative headquarters, professional, medical and dental) are permitted as primary uses in the CO zone. Lot Coverage — The proposed building footprint is approximately 17,274 square feet, which equals a building lot coverage of 13.6% of the total lot area. The CO zone allows a maximum building coverage of 65% of the total lot area or 75% if parking is provided within the building or a parking garage. Setbacks - The buildings is setback a minimum of 77 feet from SW 16th Street. The code requires a 20 foot front yard/street setback for buildings 25 to 80 feet in height. No interior or side yard setbacks are required in the CO zore. The code requires a 10 foot landscaped setback along arterial or freeway frontages. The north side of the property abuts Interstate 405. The proposed site plan does not provide the required on-site 10 foot landscaped setback. The appl'i cant indicated a preference to revise the site plan versus requesting a variance from the landiscape standard. Staff recommends a site plan condition that the applicant revise the site pla to provide the required landscape setback along the north property boundary. Landscaping - A 10 foot wide landscape strip is proposed along the street frontage of SW 16th Street, complying with the minimum standard of the code. The applicant would also be responsible for landscaping in the street right of-way. The subject site is within the Green River Valley Planning area. An environmental mitigation agreement)between the City and the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) requires that 2% of a site area be provided as a natural landscape area for wildlife habitat. The subject proposal includes native plantings surrounding the stormwater detention facility and flood storage pond. The proximity to a water source is an appropriate location for habitat plantings. However, the applicant should verify that 2% of the site aree is provided in natural landscape area. Parking regulations require 5% interior parkirjg lot landscaping. The site plan/landscape plans do not show the area of parking lot landscaping. The site plan and landscape plan should be revised to show compliance with the code standard. The site plan includes a pedestrian connection between the sidewalk along SW 16th Street and the building entry, in compliance with the code standard. Building Height - The proposed building woul l have a maximum building height of 55 feet. The CO zone allows a maximum building height of 250 feet. Parking- Parking regulations require a minimum of 3 and a maximum of 4.5 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. The prIoposed building includes a total of 53,553 square feet of office use (2nd, 3rd, and 4th building stales). The office space would require between 161 and 241 parking spaces. The site plan includes 31 garage parking spaces and 166 surface parking spaces for a total of 197 spaces. This equals a ratio of 3.68 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of office use. The number of parking spaces 'proposed complies with code requirements. The parking stalls meet the dimension requirements of the code. C. MITIGATION OF IMPACTS TO SUR OUNDING PROPERTIES AND USES; The office building proposal would not resul in adverse impacts to surrounding properties or uses. Surrounding properties are mostly developed with medium industrial warehouse/ distribution uses. Interstate 405 abuts t e subject property on the north. The EAV SITERC.doc City of Renton P/B/PIN Department iinistrative Site Plan Approval&Environment ?view Committee Staff Report SOUTH 405 PLACE OFFICE BUILDING LUA-99-186,SA-A,ECF REPORT OF FEBRUARY 1,2000 Page 10 of 13 Comprehensive Plan designation encourages a mix of commercial, office and industrial uses in the Valley,Iprovided the uses are compatible. D. MITIGATION OF IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN TO THE SITE; The site would be cleared of existing vegetation, except the existing wetland and wetland buffer are shown as outside of the clearing area. Construction activities related to the proposed development would be required to utilize best management practices which would reduce potential construction impacts on the site. Approximately one-half the site is located below the floodplain elevation of 16.58 feet. A portion of the site is going to be filled, raising the elevation above the current floodplain elevation. The applicant is proposing to compensate for the loss of volume in the floodplain by excavating the northwest part of the site outside of the wetland to provide for compensatory storage. The applicant has provided calculations in the drinage report for flood storage compensation and Plan RevieW staff has approved the volume of compensatory storage. Required Utility improvements, including the stormwater drainage system would be designed to mitigate the potential impacts of the development on the site. The construction and operation of the proposed office development is not anticipated to adversely impact the subject site. E. CONSERVATION OF AREA-WIDE PROPERTY VALUES; The proposed office development is anticipated to conserve the property values in the vicinity of the site. F. SAFETY AND EFFICIENCY OF VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION; Access to the site is proposed from a single driveway off SW 16th Street. The entry to the building is Oriented to SW 16th Street and the site plan includes a direct pedestrian connection to the sidewalk along SW 16th Street. G. PROVISION OF ADEQUATE LIGHT AND AIR; The proposed office building is sufficiently setback from property boundaries and existing buildings to allow for adequate light and air circulation to the building. H. MITIGATION OF NOISE, ODORS AND OTHER HARMFUL OR UNHEALTHY CONDITIONS; The operation of the office building is not, expected to create any harmful or unhealthy conditions. Noise, dust, and odors which maly result from construction of the project would be mitigated through measures described in the Construction Mitigation Plan and with best management practices. 1. AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED USE;AND The project site is adequately served by uflities and roads necessary to accommodate the proposed office building. The applicant will e responsible for extension of utilities on-site to SITERC.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department ninistrative Site Plan Approval&Environmen eview Committee Staff Report SOUTH 405 PLACE OFFICE BUILDING LUA-99-186,SA-A,ECF . REPORT OF FEBRUARY 1,2000 Page 11 of 13 I serve the 'building. See the Advisory Notes section of this report for detailed information concerning utilities and public services. J. PREVENTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD DETERIORATION AND BLIGHT. The proposal would serve to prevent neigh orhood deterioration and blight by improving a vacant site with an office building. The presence of office workers may assist in preventing neighborhood deterioration. I X Copies of all Review Comments re contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. 1 D. Findings,'Conclusions & Decision Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: 1) Request: The applicant has requested Environmental Review and Site Plan Approval for development of the South 405 Place Office Building. 2) Environmental Review: The applicant's file containing the application, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. 3) Site Plan Review: The applicant' site plan application complies with the requirements for information for site plan review: The applicant's site plan and other project drawings ai-e entered as Exhibits No. 2 throug 11. 4) Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area Valley (EAV). I 5) Zoning: The site plan as presented complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the Commercial Office Zoning designation, except as noted in the report. 6) Existing Land Use: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: Interstate 405; East: Office, Light Industrial; South: Industrial Warehouse; and West: Light Industrial Park. SITERC.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department iinistrative Site Plan Approval&Environmeni ?view Committee Staff Report SOUTH 405 PLACE OFFICE BUILDING LUA-99-186, SA-A,ECF . REPORT OF FEBRUARIY 1,2000 Page 12 of 13 E. Conclusions 1) The subject proposal complies with th- policies and codes of the City of Renton, except as noted in the report. 2) The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area - Valley (EAV); and the Zoning designation of Commercial Office (CO). 3) Specific Land Use (e.g. Site Plan Approval) issues were raised by various City departments. These issues are addressed in the body of this report. F. Decision, The Site Plan for South 405 Place Office Place Building, File No. LUA-99-186, SA-A, ECF, is approved subject to the following conditions. �1. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to provide a 10 foot landscaped setback along the north property boundary abutting the Interstate 405 freeway frontage. The revised plan shall be subject to the approval of the Deelopment Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 12. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to verify that a minimum 2% of the site area is provided as a natural landscape area. The revised plan shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. ✓3. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to verify that a minimum of 5% of the parking area is provided as interior parking lot landscaping. The revised plan shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Div sion prior to the issuance of building permits. EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURE: i a. 1E11 0 Jana 'a son,Zoning Administrator date SITERC.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department iinistrative Site Plan Approval&Environment pview Committee Staff Report SOUTH 405 PLACE OFFICE BUILDING LUA-99-186,SA-A,ECF • REPORT OF FEBRUARY 1,2000 Page 13 of 13 TRANSMITTED this 4th day of February, 2000 to the applicant and owner: John Radovich Development Company do Rebecca Davidson 2000 124 h Avenue NE, B-103 Bellevue, WA. 98005 Susan McLeod, Stuart Ness, Steven Ness 6645 North Ensign Portland, OR. 97217 TRANSMITTED this,4th day of February, 2000 to the folio ing: Larry Meckling, Building Official C. Duffy, Fire Prevention Neil Watts, Public Works Division Lawrence J.Warren, City Attorney South County Journal Environmental Determination and Land Use ecision Appeal Process Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM February 21,2000 If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained rom the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. SITERC.doc • a I-405 FREEWAY PROPOSED LANDSCAPED STE UGIITING PROPOSED TRASH %STRONG.STORAGE AREA TIP, ENCLOSURE LOCATION EXISTING EMERGENT REGANO ------- �1 S B6'DB•IB'W I11.56• - -- -- -- - .......... ........... I CD I I ::.'! ' .........-... I 1 '',� T 19 I 1 • 8. I C ��IE('(7�� .,...• ♦.. ���� �....0. '_ LANDSCAPE II I I O O I ,,, ... .0 ;, .., I . ■ ' � I W iiii R Q `�• u ;I �� I-Z co • 1;!... \ OFF\40, fig, _ +' L ------:,3.......i.. • MOU��.,; 1 ,N I.1 IMN I= I • I ,;`? � \ E- V I n w : 1 : I ARCHITECTURE ,''., \`• t� ®� ; ; 1 Gntl PLANNING �'•,, p {yala4� I //mow 1 b��i� ��/qp. ■• I ROYEN F.BERG.PRIN PAL ��_ � fti EXISTING BI.DG , \ 1y liV� .c ]OpJ 901N ONADJAPROPERtt I+� • TABULATION YFENF.OM�� 1/ N161JJ666x8 FA%@ SCULPNRE � 1 ow. •• Iail I ; n I NET SITE AREA t95,256 S.F. : , y,JI,. - __ ; GROSS BLDG.AREA ! I: •• ®' 12� � I G • y I 1 40FFlCE(2,3 h 4) t53,553 S.F. I ;: '. �� - _ r-i GE(1ST) 317,274 S.F. GARAGE I �'�� PROPOSED 9DEWAIx' I 1 I OFFICE COVERAGE- 1 1 JFH. , FAR W/0 GARAGE 427.GRO$S SITE NO DESCRIPTION l',.:`•..._..::::.:"- ::::: 6 .. ._6.9. , , 567.NET SITE B ` IB I TOTAL PARKING 197 STALLS REVISOR , I __ , . P • - I PRE-APP. g 1' l` .,,..,.. - /' tJ SITE PARKING 166 STALLS REVISOR II-02-99 .._........__...�-....... 0... O O _ GARAGE PARKING31 STALLS 1 I REVISION II-23-95 ................._.....-.......................- .::4"...... SUB-TOTALS 1 0 .O 35 REGULAR STALLS m NCL. a ; 56 COMPACT STALLS,H REVISION 12 OJ-99 _—_ —__ • llP.LANDSCAPE AREA STE PLAN APP. 12-10-99 .�, �'. { ___ __ - , I ACCESSIBLE STALLS MAX,) III N e9.2624 E ao.ol __1�_ 6 ACCESSIBLE STALLS / I I (INCL.1 VAN STALL) %ISTDIC LURE CUT Nu A PROPOSED CURB CUT— \ 'T-�\\ 1 272 S.F.OFFICE • MONVMENT -E7pSTING CURB E%IS11NC STREET-�• `pROPOSED 9DEWALK 20•WOE PORTION 3.6B/1000 S.F.OFFICE SON @ CUTTER MCHT,TTP, LOCATON —'— _—_—_ E - - OF VACATED THOMAS ST. SW 16THH STREET SITE PLAN & R • P. ' EMSDNG CURB CUT o to' 20. 40. .. /, FOE:99044/SITE-E6.DWC MOT, JOB NO.: 00044 SHEET NO OF: DATE: 624 9 SITE PLAN I20'I 1 CREE ""' A-1 r 196' r / 21 JS T b b b b' 2p' / I I _ 41 _ ___E [1-11L 11 • • I ` : 23 1- 1 1 ;/ > ry ti / ol=rj ✓% 5 / /:' jti� j/ / i ' I z • ui R 2 gi \/ J • nil ---\ • 1 - • Bah, I♦/ 1 0 / sinus TOT FLOOR-CARAfF H C f o1 4 f°0°v GROSS AREA 217.274.3 SF EU CORE AREA 27A7 SE 2 .'�� C \� \\ " n b STALLS EAS 21.0005E > H I-Z di 1` (INCLUDES 1 ACCESSIBLE STALL) CF)_ 1. It 1 \ —� �\ - Q ICD — li GARAGE LEVEL / 1ST FLOOR PLAN 1/16• 1 ARC HPITLANNIECTUNRE .Ng ROYCE A.BERG.PRINCIPAL E r IRE. - Y.KEN K.CAIN.PRINCIPAL / 3003 21111 AVE.SOUTNEA3T 21. 35' b' b' b' 30' 20' MERCER BLAND.WA vaI]z 9/ / 0061330.3.3 FAA 0 tow I �LI I I n I. \ \ rt . . • • . -- .• NO DESCRIPTION DATE N • — I� PRELIMINARY R-02-99 SITE PLAN APP. 12-20-99 I II POSSIBLE FUTURE I CORRIDOR 1 a ;_ } 1/ r - FLOOR PLANS ' T.- 760 FLOOR C 1 CROSS AREA 217,521 Si / C A AR 23.075 SF%EFF 627 :a - ., n.o9ou/4Os=RDs-ioiP 1,: .1011 MAz-Aw Mika r,t x DfY�t.'aa Ml •2ND FLOOR PLAN- 2:- p ce-A-oE • lc �'4., h�F .,4t.•n;. f_. �i,• •P - r. _ 7�r. .;?C,�%'�`: °•�::`St,. „4 -MA . - :-, ? �p -te --.z t`. '� 4- a :°w6 of -,!-?Sr 44 -;- 4-+•, - _ -}' %'r ! e:ri' :-.;.-x " z' ..yTy t . -, .y .",," -, • ' , p � ' w - 196. ir 4, 35 30.1 30' . f 30' 30' f 20' - • 1 1 1 ________ ____------t ::::..1 1 11 I I 1 p :::________r_____ • 1 . . „ . . ....: 11. 1 .• ..../ . . . . I-1 • . . . . i----,, 0 al POSS8LE FUTURE I I- Z CORRIDOR I 11.1 ...... 1 .2 M aqD ci. 9 CI . . . m A '11 7 -'' ri; CT ,z . :, r4 :H. 0 kl" I-• al :: _,...,0-• kiii-- . .0 r kil k ...:.• A in MIMI GROSS AREA S17.039 SF > CO=, / CORE AREA i2.067.4 SF 0 C I =Cl) • 1 - ‘..(PEN < TO %EFF. S87.80 . _ 00.0,-, ..• EC eg , Z ....• • 6 0 g 0 ......„ z ._ -TO CO cc 3RD FLOOR PLAN 1/16' 1 I E .A nR 5 HP ILT,Z,. .,ri VNR ROYCE A BERG.PRINGPAL ,• MR' Y.REN B.CHIN,PRINCIPAL A MOB SON AVE.SOUTHEAST ,,, 21 f 35. 30' T 30' 30. 30. . 20' , I MERCER RUNG.WA MOB GGO230-6.5.48 BAB MO 6647 I I I I . _......................_i 1 NO DESCRIPTION DATE ! i - PRELIMINARY 11-07-99 SITE PLAN APP. 12-20-99 I [POSSIBLE FUTURE I CORRIOOR ,le. ..sta• —.-- ,:. .......i ger, 11:1 %I 0 1 i •g . a • . . . fall; M.L. . . .. ,..i ks •:: ' FLOOR PLANS • -L_____ ---0-41111 . • --., 4TH FLOOR GROSS AREA S18.993 SF 1 CORE AREA 02.067.4 SF . %EFF. ' i89.1% EI' — ---- --- —-- • . .• 8 I. , \ 'it .., k __---- F0e:99044/405-BLEIG-6.0WO IJOB NO.: 90044 GREET NO: 4 DATE: 12-1314 DRAWN: KM A-3 4TH FLOOR PLAN 1/16' 2 CHECK: DARK TTMTED PAINTED MECHANICAL rrINSULATED GLASS DRYNT - rRWF SCREEN GLASS.TYP. FACIA o‘ N fillilCD IIIII - _ __ __ - n- ;= = , a • \\\X i I s I- I I I ! �T ` III E n ■■■ r ARn� Oa -CONCRETE TILT -POLISHED ENTRY -ARCHITECTURAL W O PANEL IV TE%RED PAINT FACIA LIGHTS W �1�r F Z SOUTH ELEVATION - CI o F- a w =a -- __ 1llllil1111M■■.■ s 1 ■■■■' o TMn� 11111IIIIIIIUolU i:g� o o .. iiiiuiui......... ... m.... iiiipmi ••■■.■ 0i■r PCj E' r�.���r NMIL■Iniim.■INEMITFOIMII __IN 0■L li ■■■I■■■ ■ .11111...��■■■■��� ® ieeeieeeIl memo meeelue - • f■11■1.ii II�w- --.. All ��.i -# I� -i_-,,�■ ARCHITECTURE „I:nI' .:ii 'I• -`1...... .:-I ��,. and PLANNING ROYCE A BERG.PRNCIPAL Y.BEN 1:.CHIN.PRINCIPAL 3033 BOTH AVE.SOUTHEAST MERCER ISLAND.WA MU WEST ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION 1206123066421FAX 230 6612 ,NO DESCRIPTION DATE PRELIMINARY 11-09-99 SITE PLAN APP. 12-20-99 I PI J , I nnm li II.. ,.'.\1 It ie. a. ■■■ I7 �— L■■. � I II b N ■ �. ELEVATIONS & EXIT EXIT EXIT PARKING GARAGE STAIR STAIR ENTRY R NORTH ELEVATION L. Foe:99044/ELEV6.DWG JOB NO.: 00064 SHEET NO CF: ' g DATE: 0-24-AA 6 DRAWN: RAJ A-4 ELEVATIONS 1/16' 1 CHECK: i P i i GRADING AND STORM DRAINAGE PLAN tn T-20' IEW ao WCO LAM BLOCK WALL Ci N =--------------- ----- ---- (VET NUL SOT C5) — a. a _' -_____ _`_- -. f ----____ -- Y-�_Y, -r-- • . `��_= -' -- O W ——'... f— ---_= I — as aa4e-w�.,ausc'�--° - _ - '•---.' Z^' —r-= --_��_ .^•'tea'. ` _ ------- w• — �� 3 v�i lU- x.a- 3 e- - = 1 ,+. II -- .. jy4 �. -- ` -- ---- / -- 1 ,« ..Iiri�I .W .I. OO ig _____________ ;::�,`. :'� ' ;; �.( • : fly: .:• E�. _ •(� ��°8 II a.,s.;s• it 5 1 1 i / /r� O. 8Ne Zii � •!'n,• ^'r,. /�� e I - ilii , �`—� (rxg(on�c Z Q 3 • R .. / ."!•Ixe '.frJ'"'"i°. E:-um• j N`4; .,.. -- e� WI "' 1 °s vo•.o'1. • j jig �' ` il'"' •.:,..i 1 1a�! „ I hit�riRa .. i �� -o ai ,y�4 •�`�"�, /'/. • / -�..� ,�--�-.'`) ■ ��- ''''''''.1'.' i', '� , • •• w s Icea,�.me1-er '' ± Et'r) 1/ ! • /§ 0� • ` `v; r l �.. E. 4S ¢ N : J 1)I! �' '•.7.�' Y'L .�x� e_iy]/' /'� �� �, 5EW CO_ . \ O Z ,n " liI zZPir�Ep ens\° �`� /E so / -8•Raa o � ` ,x. " ` � \ W 1 rt-,s ��/ \, o osK uW. / / — l a-i1e,' UC g I. 1 I :71f r o IEwrAros / // W O • e Lf u,e•Vas \pR A/ ?i / ¢-,son / / I 'a m .. ` W Z m *In ��I I1I Ks}'u o nps •�� o os:e,oma / / �1�. i 1 \•` M j CD Z^ei•E. 1 1►� ! 1gEF.. .• E /..e/ �' ��y'•, ''• • • t,' O Z a• Y 0 . . • I �' ;=t,s. \N. � , .Ti? ° NEW OF��E�'B�JILDING I eiit• �iI W4 $ W sr �x p! tEWOBRDM-_y \`` - �� GARAGE-LEVEL 17204 r��� i 111,11 .= -- O -- I_-�.1„ _ ?EV OVERFLOW _ _ '� ,•f `c_�910 FIf.1D i/ ELF 27.70f� ]::'n R. - -1 Z 7 , W - 11 • -, :titz --1= / 1 • yam. I �' •,8 \ tie Ir u•,m ,3,,0 .•;a, 1 ° • ,3 .,i"!/..n 1 :; IEw®ximfi a , ,�,�, .r,.�,l, x vir,,ossI is' a� or ill i `8_�✓ pav,,kv Lpw , `.:::` ee'\\` / x'�n a•ens H-u o nsos • �"'/ St\ �� (� ..�""I a ''' �111)'Ar ''�2. '•e�. `.\ ` - .p / ® \ . IEw YOIXAM IL".WALL :,• 8 `t PW.i 0•/•/ �� ' " \ (PER POP.WEE.CeRapp siiiiih,104Viati:,))) : I ( /e'er •,F':' :•• �. "` '8 _! J e t mic nnoo sowcE a-,. i3(�.]�j1� �:,' / :' q -- v (rtF'r pr", k,�,;'%.4'�S=d ��admilt _ -r xe.c j I'l� —Ma : •' • y y eT0°mxw PEW..Ism �'�• � ��� �� ,c ,F :L %` my }° \ , ,ig,..a ' 8 g $ " Ir. I;)ki�/tom/� ,iii�,� / ,IAil:" � i ,,. i.e°' <m � R l a r�� (7f�lp� �I I`•V i a(,a ILS) /, _.._' _ _ _If,Y ens — — • ,S yy'J ` '`.. 3 n a NaV IEw OO IK00LAB OCK WALL "i 1I1 •� y ,,,SMs„__:_ ,_, V. I-.T •.:AID: `R.' ▪ .G 7, POI COL s¢r Ca , i 1 _ _____y1 j,.M_• .....A5 _ _ _ 'yA xo.m (PER EEvaTR CS)'• m 5<" \J ' � , ! - �Ai�-• •• ,nTArAA-4 i44 -yti J K BA N, - • •9 t C. ,.y-_��-.}lFb'-• - .,- ai ` +=^'fr -„____.<-_ I, G:LR�� `__--- --.-�� - __- 2•,s os(x.•E .!l'� W --•2. _ .aka— =.lE- ' .2.=. � "> ---__ _ -- --- — ' s.T.-g;-. gnI--`,"--�"4-- rUb ';Isle . .'-- - .L. —•,.....�..�ifiE '•- _-- — ----- -- ----- ---- --^-—�— -- -- I S ax b8 I co+s``: 4� Fy,p fy =—��- • - Ew.:�so ---- —� —� �Ex.CUPS i....50.51 s CITY OF RENTON n gf,Lyy,./- IX.MR• S E.IET R!! ..�ET BC STREET ma 3 4(( B.STREET DEPARTMENT OP PUBLIC Wonsca lit (xC Ge) 9' EK PAW WIPE CC STREET UM 4,U g-F. i IX_S SOT LW. _. Y —....T cL e__-� II UUT —EE a �. .. ei . . • `IX PAINrImer— 11-i7((9•4 — EY N-5D 0n GRADING AND STORM O .. •IX VNM 5„PE ' a• . •I. TX 555 UWE DRAINAGE PLAN Z EL Ca5,16 I. SW 16H STREET _Ex _• EL CWa3 _ •--- - j-'f-•----•T- - ----•--- ` --•- - -•-n. ' PHINED NM- 'n,e a/_eL ne,n -� ,C-..; E,Pcdc'smEwlc• - ...^.,:. •.:. ,..• { . . .n':. .. .<>L,,. LO... K.m .. W.,, wTe uno.® C 24 O . • O. na,.d xm w, b ao P. I PPP—SS—TTTT ` .' CITY OF SANITARY SEWER — "" I. ±I� RENTON AND WATERMAIN EXTENSION PLAN ,,,. _.. Nn F- 1 :��I PTcnn'n9mewlnr,on P Tic work.Dept. NO. REVISION BY DMZ AFPa w®• Gregg'I m P.E,Mminiatmtor. .,^ . DO. ¢1 R 0 R+.�I I� f •"'�•'•bP�° �a ° 11 c I! 1 I• . 6 .1 / COSTING eU➢WO ` 1 I • - '• •:. ,-% ,Ii I II I'll ! I' Sl•11.57.18 29z88'asI R .4 ),Z 1 I 1f — .. � ' - \ _ �^ ' ! P• II Ili I •• • I . Ifr — -... : \ ;'-`yj1 ___. __$ IIII I II• i a • 1`1 ,'' ,�: -6-.- \ ''t `` ' _ i1 , II I I •" RieI•r �1 1I\ 4.' ,, .S 'q, — �1Iu` —� � \ ,I1 III 1 II II IRP' R 1 'g; ,1 — `��• ` 11 ykl, - 1 r ' ` i —__ ' I: • • )41.a I lro Io 1y 9? Iy ,, y ' ___ — ,1 � ,! ',:\,J ----- III 1IIIIIIIIIII I;41. i`' ;;' /y I .! I is Q • , \ o� ��N ' '/ 11111 I .�, I; .' Ill- 11'11IS, i --- t __ _ • Ill I_zp 1, III; 1 I.I• _T5___ • `'' s ��\\��•._F___--. _: ,,.r--;;= /• I•II I I 1. I I I, I S I - ^!,a---- -° , , . � '--^=' <,..:;`'` - ;--�%f"-" 1 I I CO I I: i t I `j "�°' _ a�i -'_ =` a' u, ��' "v. 9c' \; .•�,t• �'' 'III „ �: r'I ,D � �•. :':•T ! `•III D • I I� a <o-;�_ \ v \' am.. 7 '>.I III Z • `�I f Its ry�p !� �� �``�\ T'a `;; 'i'' 1'—_ 11 I --� a Hilt ,-,-- \ `Tf III D • I l III,„ �. °\• ,° \� / tc �,�` - , v IT n. ,v „v ', 1` I \`, \� .> �\ \ � -- - \`,`.\, `�� I IIII -< s1, lk �1 �� P�c ° ii- Za �g \ I I I (A ' -� _ •,,,. • .fit •"\� 0o \ ail\ ;.;',: \1 11 G I Er alp I. •,i:,,�„ .-$.1 m �;. \ II I \i �6 "£!III „„ 1,-.` /' 1i:, \\ 'S 1 r \\\ -';' "r'`'; r 11 I rn 1 •r NI•• ��' L11: •i1 , ' CZJ \'\ A.,* - Jc; , y,_I s °, • • . • I :' 1 4' b • / c� \+ . \ \\ 5 \ \ '`,'` D:' II II , • 1 •11 fI;II� I, :�I :.\� I\ \ \\ ` I I DJ �8. `, ^fir \ 4\ I II 6. 6.(SA 6,. - I -11, _.„,,,,, Ili -+ g •I I' l','I I X I I L --" _ k T 1 II i 1 `Ii �,• • —� — '�- a i /' III z III \. r I �'b • I, __CI) x y ,,,, �►"' ■-.?,____ ____,_-_, - tea- ,� '` ' . I13 --. ;fit - �- ,', z b 1. b' z n.Z" II 'O - 'O� Il •_ r km I I " ✓ ` e, • ' 111 M;' III,lir --. • B' , - ' s\ ;�I II 11 ',�, J'.sr;—' - NOl'1329"� -__321.41' __ __ o. - ------_.- III A' \4 "{�`�I�a.•IVV i g I — -h I I III _ Iw��4� »�� I �! _s I ' L.15-- VVV c'- - '-r __ • H4 '�1' aa- z 0 "p I �I I z_( O a °ff°�,,,_ 9 rn ;NI TITLE: I LOCATION: Fox 16 2 QGHA`S 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH I e 3 P .TWIG \I KEN WA 98032 JCR DEVELOPMENT 900 BLOCK OF S.W.16TH STREET . z p m` Z (a2sj2st-szz2 2000 j 124th AVENUE NE 6103 RENTON,WASHINGTON � y (425)251-8782 FA% I v E p ' BELLEVUE,WA 98005 SOUTH 405 PLACE p Z I Blac055 imp I.505NG. IA R 'La�40lxGM�a' NNRJNYENTAL SERVICES B.C.E.JOB NO. 7301 Rd.P.\30,,,,..\1101\CNG000R01GV301:PS0I D.G DOW/te.,1Z/Z1/lOOP 1,„ YON,.,01.mn..„,. Zt.101-I.ZItOI-D.Z7N11_5.-- 9 _TREE CUTTING / LAND CLEARING PLAN I s h 1 t _____________________--- -------- _---- ----_-_-- - -_ -= ;tom- z•_ N _===_=_=__ _ ____________________-=--=r,--_ T ___ = 7/ 0_ -Jt-`0°- •_ l\��` 'n1Q)I I i�x vo 411.5fi--.•�•is zo x rl ,�°i'° % \__ �-�e.s ..,e:o... }�{ d 2 -- -- x- 5,-5-. '•__,„0/cn4rmsm •IS JO •. ,. r1°�_" /2arr.....uL � C�7'"ecv--'- P' 1'�20' L•D•Z Irk \ fl/ I6r9 •n tq pl9 a,OO JJ -�-�: In\ \ " / TFgE C ND/LAND CLEARING NOTESI6.aa l; m.}g 6 Q o 1000 \"`01 - - .iig• - - - -- -_- °°_ ���JJJwww���1�]ppp OI5.Stl O0. .`i"'QO LLV9_- __-_ _ __ _ I •,-.d ,/ f / 011s o0 / FORESTED Emma Ll}9IEVE�AFEA Taloe u[zrrus dcwowco,mwc mwm� i \° '�A�mt--'-I � _- _ _YO I / / / �'q�ip�yJ�p /1.•'.°500A��@��pR RED ED00000W9NOI�&°�NM00°V CdC N°.tlR�mS SN \�•N].J°11 ` \ I / /t/••"•„1 ySr 1..0 0,.-.4.. �a•L�5•GWVT•'\ fAwA, CatBaC aU11fRWV.sumo/was. .,aM 1 �;{!:, ]p1 8 1e 1 a 7 VSNE • 0418. 51Ip000 GLOW IS 26 I ro. Di p m i,.)n1w�6M,is 901•,s/M1 ..4 p. �1: .023 1L uh°Y"°' 1 m.a (1}�1-- •n1W.1/• n l'•'.. O I I i�• / .'' 1GOJ /,,.., ®,: /�iL00' / \aM \ I1: i O1,]�Ir f• p o....M ! a a Z I I / I / •�`\\ I -0. / I \\ r. o q 'F ' \\eoo L.5 // O I I / I l lzr•�J;/�' 1 /'yam/// // S.M .1.�96W �ILM \\ )J L e '0, V63 0' .n.t I \` I 1824 / __ T. i m .,a.s ,B.00 ]0o I16 ao(1s': \ .JJI,,✓]iSt�J' • . axwma arr GUIs O i \ �,z°a� O - x \ I CF s4 F 11 i \ _4.. / O. /•`.a0 :'O�o \\ '00.1•oc OW,. 1 .1e 0u els.v uo w yw N N I �600 -�rO / \ / •' 600 .119a I 1 \ I M h [[v^^a €` W �\ 1\ \\ �_-_ °4 I \/ � pa r�H/ ®,r ,,= 1L.6. oo �,1]ncQ \ I w i 8 s c1 0 \\ Ja / \11aa •15a9O.I1f96 ,::Ea I o° o •o] 164e \\,� 1BM 1I o Z1 < mE n \ \I6. EE fi a 1n1111 g1 \ \ \ •t.10 ] '�. _i_ - .-J 16.03 I�w-'1.)I,e 00 i I J > 4 II N \ \ At f140016.25 / \ 0 p` 0 \\ \•1 zn0 \ 7Lm / 300 / o\ Or 1i°' !/ I uQyf �Q LLf 9 y z ate_ \ - o a13/ -- -- - �� I - - - - - g -- \1 ; \ // // 0 f 0 1-- - ]ro - ---,La, 159J a -- § m up 162 1 1 ,.Is9. �O' Jsv O,.e/O sReJ 6 I ( i 17--- ` Oi•s Q. 44;1 •\e.zo \n i \pro ,fb i a u 600•s2o �O. %. b• gar .©,o `1saJ J 16.ao O na,r,® 1 ¢ m2e y yi \ II `0 ('� e ' l•/L.Jq, � \•mil-(q 9 214 dCib , /1600 .I . _ i ''.- .f.', 0 j„. ,./ � • \ 1I].q i^ ,O.Yi65 /g0,4„,�1,.s 1 6___BBB IIBM /r c46, I I :/ W aaa aC06q,6..2 8 B�ofi/ . 0- r 6 s- ro E�010 e00B,s 017ea 1j1,.1,Q It ,1 )•A I I g I R ,aJo I / Qss.Ol4+tlp1 21 1.1 /s.0o 16. / i 001].62 „JD'sm i�])1 0'3z ,:D I•a 00B'.,'"PS-''''-----� n . f fC' p]g [[�� vaoo _ @ aa aa / / °o ' 1 1]6°'' U9`0es 1C0'.)9 O!ii83 / a6H on 15 On.a OR• I .. SN ! 6 8 I x X I / o O� O e z / ,{-/ `O (Yin 071�2J Oi3sszm 'T. p5 .i rnaJzl,e 0o '119wz `�`p--��� s� 4 3 I I � °Ei: / �4q0 \ 9 i 0 O1•P60r2se 0,9 2. r Is0)'OK, `m gi laa Iburs. `a9 o Rai i..4�1 r O1s_e O dO, ,, 1B Soo' aem \01s)6 la\ ( 5I u.00 030 \ \ e 0,]u O.", O1N19 ,Gib 50 n a S 1 3 \ -le✓10\• °�\ 1O \'0101 I Ou.B\ \ 1as s e " ow. . ,-- ___)1aso 3rr i • s.18�� I \ \ °\O1..es,�"- 1J�i+JO liV4.S9 01Sv� ' •, 30 O1es a O1zJB a m�w r • 8 --... - ti q 6.11(]B\ (�1).90 i 017.98 Q1].]u r01 1 ..: 1.0C .1P.]6 I - - .']..... �. /[�1[ . . B, .11 6 j49] i �I,Q[�O1 �� ®I].L2 g1)JI --_. w.m N. o es,as.00 O1an fd0i'''8 e e t q ":ia ..last,_ Lm'.:zan.ar_ ly-e rc.e. 1 N•'" 9.80 �C]-�__ �- I1`' S.6�8�• -'S)M 29Y611 6-150.1 q 1 4 '@[Y . . ar.21.. \ `re• �_ ��Fveas.00 O' -Yf�b�-- _-.oae--__ a« -,ersr�� �•-za-mop_ rc-Ism({x.-. o iD.�p E.a9 I2.•Ch -.� ,. E •. - _------- - .-' . �.tayll] .-iq PR J `,'''f u _ =- - .9� i ram. . a ' Y3J ` -_rli. tr.Y9 R].a __ --Fe::..-TV,=1.a.--:_:- .�1.v, Ix ,• _ _ 1d'ib�.lu_ - ,xi.' _=4asa-ss Ir ' T. (a IX.2,Y d.GwB / d'� ^^ (.44-41 d.51REET WO - [6.sB'f, o 911 d.619 41 C10M 00040s ' At 1.-41- -?465- �a1#----a-Na R' _11__ a MET MD a-ue f:.•CA t II _a? CITY OF RENTON . �QI.TP- -41..0---C -it19---- [-].2J B'S G _MI {/-EL CUPS L41 - / DEPARTMENT OP PUB,JO WORM, �iy • p 2.0 ',•• fJLg II,L Y'9 •. 1.� .2.26 - - _. .... 2•. Ex.GAS L0C-2123 '- II �)0 - • Ci _osJ7_n---r---f-° awn SW ---• -•----•----•- --:zl a TREE CUTTINQPLNND CLEARING ' • - ;r.:-.-. .,•. ;.}•. -_.--- ems:•='. _z.+i ••z;•:!. .ea - e.,e WOO. e - wm, rat„ , •22.13 o Ra., P ",w wR .Ir1Po .+e•.•...a • 1 O.:E V '-OO?I. Am - m �OKImAL1)J01-II.p[0 0•I.R 12/2I/19W MS S,vlc 1-A,btlu,4Mr 2eB01-),260e2-; ec.-Twee-r a. d A • - • -Fra) -BAAK.L, .T�rc,+� /,I 6 x 10:7 r ,. ,,•31 � �a�ila000 •iv: +30�'•`. -�`„ I c,.,r�a/ **COk• ec I- Viit Ti .lb7-` :1\ '/�, r scxenuncewvrnrArERULLEGEND � ` �• µ-_ I�. �___--- li,� �� •may Id,La �.W a SY Mil \11$2- • • . ., .DImO,.[p�.d... Was..a. ColadnyklaN • tQ 'I• a «. T.:'iWmIW.aIDM00 a li to iSgi 7� • o'o..l T • ,,��0! �p�° �, 5� Lp_ f1 � .\ _..rlv,wM.n+� c.vaa-r rtlr,w.r... U Q ....P.O. , 44 Ma 1..mnilLimis LOIN 8 � A� '.�Fh,u-•+men ;�.34►4'ii'C'i� ;,1•`� �:l� r•.vrr,u.ft..rn JU ACV •. • .. "¢` , 1/./ '��, /y� ® w ..P w F ■,vet....,,..— W���***''' `t� L avA � xArmwA=�4010R W4 u f '17DI\� • • bu ....r.c S :Oz �f• U_'1' �I46ur.i �`• IM '.�:� Y-r...bra.cae.....u,�..w+wear N ip .. � �.J -���/ � ��I � ;!'.t m W.u.ncolmU �, • �; LW. :,l' -•''' _PROPOSED BUILDING_ ARA ' �1 •• om� r.'r`o-uw...p.r.wmr„R,e ¢ • Alitio, �•�'� '` `' * !'�,� {•�, m•�ArEM& •a..j..nmrnn'�a.ro.ti.r,r...,ez��� I P i"�;, ¢ ro �.� v«««wr 01..!...:::.-:.,::.1.d aaneM c,.aaam.ul.R. z Qp o CO ir '�',, ^ ,, "D TIh3ia i ,'��` ..,•: I i I SCREMATIC NATIVE PLANI'MATERIAL LEGEND O co I Ir -0""1; ..'�. �7L -411 I /.•.� I GI�Ce�;•� - c`�...ura , - 4. Wt '� w+. - Q�JIa �L J . -`�;'- �e�,,� �!,I �• ' .:; g4/ r�.�e"n�n.n�,.q... �'�� ���� A i�Ow.:.Px �r�1iP'p', ��`� z � I(I� �1_I � 'Mi�`',�O ::I ��.vr��..lr...tral • �r.r .w,..7ARCHECLURE k. . IF _ -m.y.,.µ•..,- s3.1 �I • ROrc[.�ePSG.P..cwu ' .00AteAmiL�: �" .. w.- i NO \\ I m'w•v...`�"..w.�m. Y.xu imnve.G.7wrto i, ( :• • r.'.aJ1J�..Mrb fii;iiiik c..,uw,r..c..w sP..me w.vaG,o.vels1 /.+,•• �41,/{, - - tam �%_.04� ,A>.v. \�...�iA�'rt�>^ I ' *.�.aenr r.r.w.. ImalsesmnFAN WOMB ,da,. �i� "� I•,syS' 9`Q - .q J RR PR«�f-� 'Gt- S, N 'A.1�,i;TI� ,�� �.�Ir i • • • rw•.wm..yr -ewes t��o' \. # , Qal i4s,..D9I4— -' -. - - ---- _ j 2Ef!N • - -OiFS t, ., T F7 • ��'-��' .1 11 �� grywk▪ 4..srr.amreaIs o oE50aPnON DATE e•e..b.bw•b .�iarW•��Pe�Ir••.ryfll.Wnr/1.rw rMbha•Y J.ly.m• Ipr.r..yy. 91E PLAN.P _ -Am .. � AM •srew...la.se y.e I/ -- '- \1 1� ..:�'�H ,,• g r�..p�•+rr"r4...War.u...R�.n...a..........6..�w,. N�.�I.y 1 nn+anvtf�larfCw.• _ _ wrrr..a.....•1•.....a...r LjIiATN 416✓rNM..r, ..i N c•T-vlt IGr=yEl f'ffw•P 1. :": .w:, .'o'r'.. m:r.i „:" ry SW 16TH STREET `ea.~.�r �+•-t+m•Rs -...•r......,.R� •very a rasesa aiy..sra.r....rreer asaws mama**....W VY...O.vn..a.a Waft.rNi•r \\ / ...r...tl........•,..al�.ma...was erne*. .. e4414•qr lu*.1.4p....p..r.l.�p.abv 7M ,8,,, ..... NIr .....r.*.,*..,rr"..----" ee„n"—vt SCHEMATIC -.I..*.were r .lass' LANDSCAPE PLAN • ia v.s.r...1..rw..rr..... .I*o+.r.e mes r .uprier • Ca.ar...•r..say.ut.a....a aswear Lauchlin R Bethune Associates •t..dv1P•.Ot0.m•Eintraucual Moult,A IA ..,e.el...r..,re... Pr. (.e)u.a.a Kea.w...p.well fix*1.Na.a.. •19Ina • a IM' , .M' M' " fie:99044/SITE-E6.0v.0 I. JOB NO.: IRON SHEET NO Of: r•sM' NI.eM DATE: H�� SCHEMATIC LANDSCAPE PLAN 20' 1 c.Ec:L / I'1.1 REPORT City of Renton Department of Planning/ uilding/Public Works DECISION ENVIRONMENTAL R VIEW& ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION REPORT DATE: February 1, 2000 Project Name: South 405 Place Office Building Applicant: John Radovich Development Company Owner: Susan McLeod, Stuart (Jess, Steven Ness File Number: LUA-099-186 SA-A, ECF Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Description: Proposal to construct a 70,827 sq. ft. office building with three stories of office over one floor of garage parking. Access to the site would be from one driveway off of SW 16th Street. A total of 197 parking stalls are proposed, including 31 garage spaces. There is a wetland areal, approximately 1,850 sq. ft. in size, located in the northwest corner of the site. The wetland report states it is a Category 3 wetland and hydrologically isolated and therefore exempt from City wetland regiilations. The applicant proposes to use the wetland area as a flood storage pond. Project Location: 900 SW 16th Street Exist. Bldg. Area: N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area: 70,827 sq. ft. Site Area: 2.9 acres Total Building Area: 70,827 sq. ft. CONCURRENCE DATE ram.a' E IN A7E 00 Project Location Map , SITERC iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii > '< ''' >'»> »>'<»< >>> >'<'€'''''''"'''"'''"'"€''""' On the 1day of 1-2bVuouu 2000, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing eirt dete-MAltAck-414-1AS documents. This information was sent to: Department of Ecology KC Dept.of Development&Environmental Services .KC Wastewater Treatment Division City of Kent I Washington Department of Fisheries City of Newcastle Department of Natural Resources • ! Lincoln Property Company WA Department of Transportation Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Indian Tribe Muckleshoot Indian Tribe l Puget Sound Energy US Army Corp.of Engineers (Signature of Sender) S v__V-. � STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING c I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Ze-r\c\ �'_1 c'• Salt signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for th0 uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. �y Date : MARLYN KAI MOHEFF Notary i nd for the State of Wa.p('ngton NOTARY PUBLIC Notary (Pri t) MARILYN KAMCHEFF STATE OF WASHINGTON My appointme i COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 29,2003 Project Name: So�tL, 40S PLace. office ks t Project Number: NOTARY1.DOC - y'i �� _ :. CITY OF:RENTON l' Planning/Building/Public Works Department - Jesse Tanner,Mayor• Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator February 3,2000 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia,WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on February 1, 2000. DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED SOUTH 405 PLACE OFFICE BUILDING LUA-99-186,SA-A,ECF Proposal to construct a 70,827 sq.ft. office building with three stories of office over one floor of garage parking. Access to the site would be from one driveway off of SW 16th Street. A total of 197 parking stalls are proposed, including 31 garage spaces. There is a wetland are , approximately 1,850 sq.ft. in size, located in the northwest •, corner of the site. The wetland report states it is a Category 3 wetland and hydrologically isolated and therefore • exempt from City wetland regulations..The applicant proposes to use the wetland area as a flood storage pond. Location: 900,SW 16th Street. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM February 21, 2000 . If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office. If you have questions, please call me at(425)430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, Peter Rosen ' Project Manager cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Eric Swensonl, Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom,(Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Joe Jainga, Puget Sound Energy • agencyltr\ 1055,South Grady-Way=.Renton,Washington 98055 - • CITY OF.RENTON ,.� it Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator February 3, 2000 Ms. Rebecca Davidson John C. Radoyich Development Company 2000—124th Avenue NE, B-103 Bellevue,WA 198005 SUBJECT: South 405 Place Office Building Project No. LUA-99-186,SA-A,ECF Dear Ms. Davidson: - This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to advise you that they have cornpleted their review of the subject project. The ERC, on February 1, 2000, issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. See the enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM February 21, 2000 . If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your,appeal rights more fully, if you chaise to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425)43017219. For the Environmental Review Committee, /0 Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: Susan McLeod, Stuart Ness, Steven Ness/Owners Enclosure dnsmItr 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%r(cycled material,20%post consumer - . CITY OF ENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES & CONDITIONS APPLICATION:NO(S): LUA-99-186,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: I John Radovich Development Company PROJECT NAME: South 405 Place Office Building DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 70,827 sq. ft. office building with three stories gf office over one floor of garage parking. Access to the site would be from one driveway off of SW 16t Street. A total of 197 parking stalls are proposed, including 31 garage spaces. There is a wetland area, approximately 1,850 sq. ft. in size, located in the northwest corner of the site. The wetland report states it is a Category 3 wetland and hydrologically isolated and therefore exempt from City wetland regulations. The applicant proposes to use the wetland area as a flood storage pond. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 900 SW 16th Street MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the geotechnical report prepared by Earth Consultants, Inc. (dated March 16, 1999) with regard to any site disturbance, preparation, or development activities. 2. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new const Iuction. This fee is estimated at $36,8'30.04. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 3. The applicant shall be required to,pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is estimated at $61,575. This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. The Site Plan;for South 405 Place Office Place Building, File No. LUA-99-186, SA-A, ECF, is approved subject to the following conditions. 1. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to provide a 10 foot landscaped setback along they north property boundary abutting the Interstate 405 freeway frontage. The revised plan shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to verify that a minimum 2% of the site area is provided as a natural landscape area. The revised plan shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 3. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to verify that a minimum of 5% of the parking area is provided as interior parking lot landscaping. The revised plan shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. • • CITY OF ENTON • DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-186,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: John Radovich Development Company PROJECT NAME: South 405 Place Office Building DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 70,827 sq. ft. office building with three stories gf office over one floor of garage parking. Access to the site would be from one driveway off of SW 16' Street. A total of 197 parking stalls are proposed, including 31 garage spaces. There is a wetland area, approximately 1,850 sq. ft. in size, located in the northwest corner of the site. The wetland report states it is a Category 3 wetland and hydrologically isolated and therefore exempt from City wetland regulations. The applicant proposes to use the wetland area as a flood storage pond. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 900 SW 16th Street Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flow is 2500 GPM, which requires one hydrant within 150 feet of the building and two additional hydrants within 300 feet of the building. The design as shown is not acceptable. 2. An approived fire sprinkler and standpipe system shall be installed throughout the structure. 3. An approved fire alarm system shall be installed throughout the structure. 4. Fire department apparatus access is required within 150-feet of all points on the building. An approved on-site fire department apparatus turnaround is required and is acceptable as shown on the site plan. Access roadways are required to be a minimum of 20-feet wide with 25-feet inside and 45- feet outside turning radius. All on-site roadways shall be painted and signed per City fire lane ordinance. PLAN REVIEW Water 1. The Water System Development Connection ChlIarge is $14,336.99. 2. A looped, water main is required. The requA-ed fire flow is 2500 gpm per the Fire Prevention Department. The proposed 8-inch dead end waier main can only deliver 1250 gpm of fire flow. 3. The primary fire hydrant is to be within 150-feet f the structure, but not closer than 50 feet. 4. Construction drawings to meet City of Renton DtIafting Standards. Storm/Surface Water 1. The Storm System Development Connection charge is $0.129 per square foot of new impervious surface area, but not less than $385. Based on the Environmental Review submittal the storm drainage connection charge is $9,721.31. 2. Vertical profile of retention pond facilities to be shown on construction plans. 3. Use NAVD 1988 datum for elevations. South 405 Place Office Building LUA-99-186,SA-A,ECF Advisory Notes (continued) Page 2 of 2 4. Please indicate the vertical datum for all elevations. The T.I.R. report states the FEMA 100-year flood elevation is 16.58,which we assume is in the datL.m NAVD 88 (same as the plans). This is incorrect. The FEMA map in the report shows a floodplain elevation of 16.00 (NGVD 29) which converts to El. 19.58 (NAVD 88). We believe the elevation 16.58 that is being used in the report comes from the City hydraulic/hydrologic model which more accurately computes the 100-year flood elevation. The City requires the finished floor elevation to be 1.0 foo above the FEMA 100-year flood elevation of 19.58 (NAVD 88), or 20.58 (NAVD 88). This must be demonstrated on the project drawings prior to the issuance of construction permits. Compensatory storage is calculated using the elevation from the City's model for the 100-year, future condition,flow that is 16.58 (NAVD 88). Applicant must verify compliance with FEMA National Flood Insurance Program Requirements regarding finished floor of a parking garage set below the FEMA 100-year flood elevation of 19.58 (NAVD 88j. Please provide a drawing showing the pre- and post-developed drainage paths as well as a time of concentration calculation sheet, clearly showing your methodology and any assumptions. We question the pre- and post-developed peak flows in the detention sizing calculations. Why is the time of concentration of 10 minutes the same foil both the pre- and post-developed condition? Based on the existing site description (lightly forested with light underbrush and the accompanying photographs) the pre-developed Tc should be longer than 10 min. and certainly not equal the post- developed;Tc. In addition, a Tc of 10 min. for post-development seems too long given the majority of the flow path is pipe flow. Please revisit. Final plan et will need to include a detention pond and storm drain profile showing all utility crossings. The conveyance system design and analysis must include hydraulic gradient calculations. 5. The hydraulic gradient computations for the conveyance system design don't include any analysis of the pipe segment between CB4 to CB3. Wastewater 1. The Sewer System Development Connection (SDC) Charge is $0.078 per gross square feet, but not less than $850. The SDC charge is$9,896.33. 2. If the project produces fats, oil, or grease, then an appropriate removal system will be required per plumbing!code. 3. Side sewer line to have a 2% slope to property lire. 4. Side sewer to have a cleanout five (5')feet out from the building and every 100-feet thereafter. 5. A sewer 'backflow prevention device is required for the sewer line only when the floor elevation is below 25feet. Transportation 1. A new 5 foot wide sidewalk is required along SW 16th Street. 2. A minimum of a 5 foot wide planter strip is required between the curb and sidewalk. AIRPORT The proposed construction is situated within the 179 foot maximum elevation area surrounding the airport. PLANNING 1. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. PARKS 1. A 5-foot wide striped and signed bike lane is required on SW 16th Street, as identified in the Trails Master plan. 2. All landscaping outside of property lines is to be maintained by the owner. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF ION-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-186,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: John Radovich Development Company PROJECT NAME: South 405 Place Office Building DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construc a 70,827 sq. ft. office building wit three stories of office over one floor of garage parking. Access to the site would b e from one driveway off of SW 16t Street. A total of 197 parking stalls are proposed, including 31 garage spaces. There is a wetland area, approximately 1,850 sq. ft. in size, located in the northwest corner of the site. The wetland report states it is a Category 3 wetland and hydrologically isolated and therefore exempt from City wetland regulations. The applicant proposes to use the wetland area as a flood storage pond. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 900 SW 16th Street LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 4 .21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM February 21, 2000 . If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Wa4, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from tie Renton City Clerk's Office. PUBLICATION DATE: February 7, 2000 DATE OF DECISION: February 1, 2000 SIGNATURES: >2 I/1 e WI 7/1 m , Admin" efe istratorXGregg Z DATE //Iepartm anning/Building/Public Works % _.--- 1 :J ` �f�d Jinn.hepherd, A:mini/ator DA E Co munity Services t/ a /4/ I ,,„,z.Z ' _,' /— ( r-0 Lee, h eler, Fire Chief DATE Renton Fire Department signature . CITY OF IL.ENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASU ES & CONDITIONS APPLICATIONS NO(S): LUA-99-186,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: John Radovich Development Company PROJECT NAME: South 405 Place Office Building DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 70,827 sq. ft. office building with three stories 9f office over one floor of garage parking. Access to the site would be from one driveway off of SW 16tStreet. A total of 197 parking stalls are proposed, including 31 garage spaces. There is a wetland area, approximately 1,850 sq. ft. in size, located in the northwest corner of the site. The wetland report states it is a Category 3 wetland and hydrologically isolated and therefore exempt from City wetland regulations. The applicant proposes to use the wetland area as a flood storage pond. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 900 SW 16th Street MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the geotechnical report prepared by Earth Consultants, Inc. (dated March 16, 1999) with regard to any site disturbance, preparation, or development activities. 2. The applicnt shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at $36,8 0.04. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average daily trip associated lwith the project. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is estimated at $61,575. This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. The Site Plan jfor South 405 Place Office Place Building, File No. LUA-99-186, SA-A, ECF, is approved subject to the following conditions. 1. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to provide a 10 foot landscaped setback along the inorth property boundary abutting the Interstate 405 freeway frontage. The revised plan shall be subject to the appro')al of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to verify that a minimum 2% of the site area is provided as a natural landscape area. The revised plan shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 3. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to verify that a minimum of 5% of the parking area is provided as interior parking lot landscaping. The revised plan shall be subject to Ithe approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION 019 NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISO Y NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-186,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: John Radovich Development Company PROJECT NAME: South 405 Place Office Building DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 70,827 sq. ft. office building with three stories gf office over one floor of garage parking. Access to the site would be from one driveway off of SW 16t Street. A total of 197 parking stalls are proposed, including 31 garage spaces. There is a wetland area,(approximately 1,850 sq. ft. in size, located in the northwest corner of the site. The wetland report states it is a Category 3 wetland and hydrologically isolated and therefore exempt from City wetland regulations. The applicant proposes to use the wetland area as a flood storage pond. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 900 SW 16th Street Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the.appeal process for environmental determinations. FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flow is 2500 GPM, which requires one hydrant within 150 feet of the building and two additional hydrants within 300 feet of the building. The design as shown is not acceptable. 2. An appr4red fire sprinkler and standpipe system shall be installed throughout the structure. 3. An approved.fire alarm system shall be installed throughout the structure. 4. Fire department apparatus access is requirec within 150-feet of all points on the building. An approved on-site fire department apparatus turnaround is required and is acceptable as shown on the site plan. Access roadways are required to be a minimum of 20-feet wide with 25-feet inside and 45- feet outside turning radius. All on-site roadways shall be painted and signed per City fire lane ordinance. PLAN REVIEW Water 1. The Water System Development Connection Charge is $14,336.99. 2. A looped water main is required. The requi led fire flow is 2500 gpm per the Fire Prevention Department. The proposed 8-inch dead end water main can only deliver 1250 gpm of fire flow. 3. The primary fire hydrant is to be within 150-feet of the structure, but not closer than 50 feet. 4. Construction drawings to meet City of Renton Drafting Standards. Storm/Surface Water 1. The Storm System Development Connection charge is $0.129 per square foot of new impervious surface area, but not less than $385. Based on the Environmental Review submittal the storm drainage connection charge is $9,721.31. 2. Vertical profile of retention pond facilities to be shown on construction plans. 3. Use NAVD 1988 datum for elevations. South 405 Place Office Building • LUA-99-186,SA-A,ECF Advisory Notes (continued) Page2of2 ; ' 4. Please indicate the vertical datum for all elevations. The T.I.R. report states the FEMA 100-year flood elevation is 16.58,which we assume is in the datum NAVD 88 (same as the plans). This is incorrect. The FEMA map in the report shows a floodplain elevation of 16.00 (NGVD 29) which converts to El. 19.58 (NAVD 88). We believe the elevation 16.58 that is being used in the report comes from the City hydraulic/hydrologic model which more accurately,computes the 100-year flood elevation. The City requires the finished floor elevation to be 1.0 fobt above the FEMA 100-year flood elevation of 19.58 (NAVD 88), or 20.58 (NAVD 88). This must b,'e demonstrated on the project drawings prior to the issuance of construction permits. 1 Compensatory storage is calculated using the elevation from the City's model for the 100-year, future condition,',flow that is 16.58 (NAVD 88). Applicant must verify compliance with FEMA National Flood Insurance Program Requirements regarding finished floor of a parking garage set below the FEMA 100-year flood elevation of 19.58 (NAVD 88). Please provide a drawing showing the pre- and post-developed drainage paths as well as a time of concentration calculation sheet, clearly showing your methodology and any assumptions. We question the pre- and post-developed peak'flows in the detention sizing calculations. Why is the time of concentration of 10 minutes the same for both the pre- and post-developed condition? Based on the existing site description (lightly forested with light underbrush and the accompanying photographs) the pre-developed,Tc should be longer than 10 min. and certainly not equal the post- developed Tc. In addition, a To of 10 min. for p st-development seems too long given the majority of the flow pith is pipe flow. Please revisit. ` Final plan set will need to include a detention pond and storm drain profile showing all utility crossings. The conveyance system design end"analysis„must include hydraulic gradient calculations. 5. The hydraulic gradient computations for the''conveyance system design don't include any analysis of the pipe segment between CB4 to CB3.' Wastewater 1. The Sewer System Development Connection (SDC) Charge is $0.078 per gross square feet, but not less thanl$850. The SDC charge is$9,896.33. 2. If the project produces fats, oil, or grease, then an appropriate removal system will be required per plumbing code. 3. Side sewer line to have a 2% slope to property line. 4. Side sewer to have a cleanout five (5')feet out from the building and every 100-feet thereafter. 5. A sewer Ibackflow prevention device is required for the sewer line only when the floor elevation is • below 25 feet. Transportation 1. A new 5 foot wide sidewalk is required along SV1/ 16th Street. 2. A minimum of a 5 foot wide planter strip is required between the curb and sidewalk. AIRPORT The proposed construction is situated within the 179 foot maximum elevation area surrounding the airport. PLANNING 1. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. • PARKS 1. A 5-foot wide striped and signed bike lane is required on SW 16th Street, as identified in the Trails Master plan. 2. All landscaping outside of property lines is to be maintained by the owner. I . iti / II ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION , OE • POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PE ONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION I I PROJECT NAME: SOUTH 405 PLACE OFFICE UILDINO PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-99-186,SA-A.ECF • Proposal to construct a 70.627 sq.fL office building,'Ih three stories of office over one floor of garage parking.Access to the site would be from one driveway off of SW 16^Sheet A total of 197 parking stalls ere proposed.Including 31 garage spaces.There li a wetland area.approximately 1.650 sq.It.In size, located In the northwest corner of the site. The wetland report states it Is a Category 3 wetland and hydrologically Isolated and therefore exempt from City'wetland regulations.The applicant proposes to use the wetland area as a flood storage pond.Location:ego SW 16^StreeL THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC)HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of either the environmental determination[ROW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11.E10]and/or the land use decision must be filed In writing on or before 5:00 PM February 21,2000.If no appeals are filed by this date• both actions will become final.Appeals must bo filed In writing together with the required$75.00 application 7 f.s with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 44-118.Additional Information regarding the appeal process maybe obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office. • ,..-4• ,.... t 1 A ,1241., I i i I Milli.6.11. 0 i,:t.,: t• gib' 1 �A 6 I' �r ' i "�i J+ R. 1 co w 1 �s��+` •I l a 6l r ? ro • ifli e 00 It' • r_, sYiivnrr . ,. __ __. Ipr . Jul I �: c gip- �'�J. I II id, tc.Q • • I I. o I,: i, -- • o- .s. ,. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION /' i Ics-- -'"Please Include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file Identification. / / CERTIFICATION I, ec._ gr; e)(-\ , hereb certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on . F9_61v0.ri 71 GP Signed: , ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me,a Nortary Public, in and for e tate off Washington residing ��d ,on the 1 day of - 4, MARILYN KAMCHEFF ,) NOTARY PUBLIC _e_A* STATE OF 1NASHINGTON ` ,----�1 cle--- �i rj...“21)1) COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 29, 2003 i 1 MARILYN KAMCHEFF MY AIPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 • • • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Charlotte Ann Kassens first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL NOTICE-OF.ENVIRONMENTAL ' DETERMINATION 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON a dailynewspaper seventimes a week. Said newspaper is a le al I The has issued atal Review Committeeofpublished (7) 9 (ERC) issued Determination of Non- newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months Significance-Mitigated for the following pro- prior to the date of ublication, referred to, printed andpublished in the English language Mut under the authority of the Renton P 9Municipal Code. continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County ; SOUTH 405 PLACE OFFICE BLDG • Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper bar order of the Superior Court of the P Proposal to,SA A,ECF to construct a 70,827 sq. ft. State of Washington for King County. office building.Location:900 SW 16th St.. The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County Appeals of the environmental determina- tionJournal not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers 5:00must be Februaryfiled in writing pea before (andpp g Y PM 21,2000.Appeals must I during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a i be filed in writing together with the'required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing° Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South+ South 405 Place Office Bldg. Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055.Appeals to i the Examiner are governed'by City of RentonMunicipaLCade Sectior_4._84.1-B.' as-published-on:2/7/00 Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton • The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$34.50, City Clerk's Office,(425)430-6510. Published in the South County Journal ' charged to Acct. No. 8051067. February.7,2000.7165 _�� _ Legal Number 7165 Le a Cler , o h oun ournal SubscriJ t and sworn before me on this 7Aday of ' 6, , 2000 Qp°\\" F" a "' °° t�. P.3' FF oOaF, -r,q p (Lit rb-:---LJ}\ ®spy,.., P Notary Public of the State of Washington 0 �``' residing in Renton :; G : q©• .°�; King County, Washington 6eao6�Op VI dOCCS6000v°o°°°° NOTICE OF ENVIRONME TAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL R VIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. SOUTH 405 PLACE OFFICE BLDG LUA-99-186,SA-A,ECF Proposal to construct a 70,827 sq.ft. office building. Location: 900 SW 16th St. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM, February 21, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, lenton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 48-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. Publication Date: February 7, 2000 Account No. 51067 dnsmpub.dot �I City of Ramon Department of Planning/Building/Public V.., —; ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: � COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 19, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-186,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 5,2000 APPLICANT: John C. Radovich Development Company PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: South 405 Place WORK ORDER NO: 78620 LOCATION: 900 Block of SW 16th Street SITE AREA: 2.9 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 70,827 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 70,827 sq.ft.(Ice building with three stories of office over one floor of garage parking. Access to the site would be from one driveway off of SW 16 Street. A total of 197 parking stalls are proposed, including 31 garage spaces. There is a wetland area,approximately 1,850 sq.ft. in size, located in the northwest corner of the site. The wetland report states it is a Category 3 wetland and hydrologically isolated and therefore exempt from wetland regulations. The applicant proposes to use the wetland area as a flood storage pond. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air _Aesthetics - _ Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 3 (, ) CFS aiYuca �t!� 4o.e a aleJr/ B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date routing Rev.10/93 PROJECT LUA 99II-186, SA-A, ECF South 405 Place City of Renton Department of Pla ping/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET (Continuation) POLICE RELATED COMMENTS 36.62 Police Calls for Service Estimated An ually CONSTRUCTION PHASE To protecti'materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site will need security lighting and any construction trailer should be completely fenced in with potable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective thief and will demonstrate that this area is private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked when not in use, and should also have a heavy-duty deadbolt installed with no less then a 1-1/2"throw when bolted. Glass windows in the trailer should be shatter-resistant. I also recommend the business post the appropriate "No Trespassing" signs on the property while it's under construction(flier attached). This will aid police in making arrests on the property after hours if suspects tre observed vandalizing or stealing building materials. The use of off-duty police officers or private security guards to patrol the site during the hours of darkness is also recommended. COMPLETED BUILDING It's important to direct any and all foot traffic into the main front entrance that should be monitored during all hours of business. This will provide the building the control it will need to keep track of the comings and goings of all visitors. Any other exterior doors should be,by coded access only to prevent trespassing of individuals who have no right to be on the property. All doors should be made of a solid core wood or metal with auxiliary locking devices with latch guards or pry-resistant cylinders around the locks. It is recommended that this building have a monitored security alarm installed. All doors leading to the outside should have the words `Alarmed Door" in red lettering and at least 6" in height painted on the outside of each door to deter any criminals from breaking in at these points of entry. I Landscaping around the exterior of the building should not be too dense or high. It is importan to allow visibility. Too much landscaping will give the building the look of a fortress and possibly give a burglar sufficient coverage to break into the facility, especially, during the hours of darkness. • _J ��-��� , Trespass USINES Enforcement • Quite often, business owners and managers are faced with crimes that occur on the property after the businesses are closed and the employees have gone home. Some of the crimes that occur are burglary, vandalism, graffiti, trespassing, drug dealing and robbery in the parking lots. There is a way for police and business owners to discourage these types of crimes from taking place on private property, and that is by enforcing the City of Renton's Municipal Trespass Code 6-18-10. In order for police to be able to make an arrest for Trespass, business owners or managers need to purchase signs and display them in conspicuous areas on the property. These signs need to include the following language: 1. Indicate that the subject property is privately owned and; 2. Uninvited presence on the specified property is not permitted during the hours the business is closed, and; 3. Violators will be subject to criminal sanctions pursuant to Renton City Code 6-18-10. MOST IMPORTANTLY-THE SIGNS SHOULD BE CONSPICUOUS FROM ALL POSSIBLE POINTS OF ENTRY TO THE PROPERTY, AND ALSO BE PLACED ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDINGS. This way when a suspect is arrested, he/she will not be able to claim as a defense that he/she did not know he or she was trespassing. EXAMPLES FOR TRESPASS SIGNS: NO TRESPASSING NO TRESPASSING This is private property. Persons without specific No . Trespassing after business hours business are not authorized to be on the premises between (insert specific times). Anyone on the the hours of(insert the hours your business is closed). premises after business hours is subject to Violators are subject to arrest and/or citation for cnminal arrest and/or citation for Criminal Trespass pursuant to Renton City Code#6-18-10.. Trespass and/or impoundment of vehicle. Per Renton City Code #6-18-10. By enforcing the Trespass Ordinance, business owners and police will be sending a message to criminals that they are not allowed to conduct criminal activit j on the property. In making arrests for Trespass, police may be preventing the more serious crimes from taking place. .01' 0. COURTESY OF RENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT • CRIME PREVENTION UNIT 7.N 2,35- 2571 • City o};, ,,i ton Department of Planning/Building/Pub,,. ✓orks • ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPME T APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENTOalde SalliC /S COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 19, 2000 CITE'C E�ITO!`r APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-186,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 5,2000 APPLICANT: John C.Radovich Development Company PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen i�0 PROJECT TITLE: South 405 Place WORK ORDER NO: 78620 JAN U LOCATION: 900 Block of SW 16th Street BU1Llauv.A ray v iQic)11V SITE AREA: 2.9 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 70,827 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 70,827 sq.ft.office building with three stories of office over one floor of garage parking. Access to the site would be from one driveway off of SW 16 Street. A total of 197 parking stalls are proposed, including 31 garage spaces. There is a wetland area,approximately 1,850 sq.ff.in size, located in the northwest corner of the site. The wetland report states it is a Category 3 wetland and hydrologically isolated and therefore exempt from wetland regulations. The applicant proposes to use the wetland area as a flood storage pond. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element or'the 1Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment [Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth I Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use I Utilities • Animals Transportation Environmental Health i Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • • C. CODE-RELATED'COMMENTS 4L+C)1^—e— • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and hav identified reas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this propdsal. • Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date routing Rev.10/93 f / City of •n Department of Panning/Building/Public i. ks • ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Arts COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 19, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-186,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 5,2000 APPLICANT: John C. Radovich Development Company PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: South 4105 Place WORK ORDER NO: 78620 LOCATION: 900 Block of SW 16th Street I SITE AREA: 2.9 acres 1 I BUILDING AREA(gross): 70,827 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 70,827 sq.ft.olice building with. three stories of office over one floor of garage parking. Access to the site would be from one driveway off of SW 1 B Street. A total of 197 parking stalls are proposed,including 31 garage spaces. There is a wetland area, approximately 1,850 sq.ft.in size, located in the northwest corner of the site. The wetland report states it is a Category 3 wetland and hydrologically isolated and therefore exempt from wetland regulations. The applicant proposes to use the wetland area as a flood storage pond. 1 A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air I Aesthetics Water I Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet A 7g4. ....A,IA,e____ aA.t._... 7,--1..o B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS d 5 ' Gc) ice- 4(577 7dG ` ''' / cr)d 1 d /e.__- ..5; ,aJ. /l _ iavvil;eed, -7111..L. . ', ..07-7, 't,(_XS/ /d ,' (.7)-2-c- ir-76 A_____ C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS , _AC/UN-, cw— �-�,'.�,,0 g<.. • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where ditional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. /'-7 177 Signature of Director uth'o• d Representative Date" routing I Rev.10/93 City of Rtm.:,n Department of Pllanning/Building/Public:,,,,is ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET 1 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: /'r� LMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 19, 2000I APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-186,SA-IA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 5, 4e", ON FIRE®Epp' ;t PREI��yI111 BUREAU APPLICANT: John C. Radovich Development Company PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: South,405 Place 1NORK ORDER NO: 78620 jAN u ., ";.,rat 1 LOCATION: 900 Block of SW 16th Street RECit—;u SITE AREA: 2.9 acres 1 I BUILDING AREA(gross): 70,827 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 70,827 sq.ft.office building with three stories of office over one floor of garage parking. Access to the site would be from one driveway off of SW 1t2 Street. A total of 197 parking stalls are proposed,including 31 garage spaces. There is a wetland area,approximately 1,850 sq.ft.!n size, located in the northwest corner of the site. The wetland report states it is a Category 3 wetland and hydrologically isolated and therefore exempt from wetland regulations. The applicant proposes to use the wetland area as a flood storage pond. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information ln7pacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 5—ea_ ovi I-2,-c itj "—..e....Fin...e), it B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS f vD rva, C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS i Sc¢ a."4- 1/1"...e..44-...e, We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas to which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to pro rly assess this proposal. e t/ / .7 00 Signature of Director or Authorized Represen five Date Rev.10r93 routing � O� CITY OF RENTON �; FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU R„ MEMORANDUM j o DATE: January 7, 2000 TO: Peter Rosen, Senior Planner FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector SUBJECT: Comments for JCR Office Facility Code-Related Comments: 1 . The preliminary fire flow required is 2,500 gpm. Three fire hydrants are required. One fire,hydrant is required within 150-feet of the structure and the secondary hydrants are required within 300-feet bf the structure. Design as shown is not acceptable. 2. An approved fire sprinkler and standpipe system shall be installed throughout the structure. 3. An approved fire alarm system shall be installed throughout the structure. 4. Fire department apparatus access is required within 150-feet of all points on the building! An approved onsite fire department apparatus turn around is required and is acceptable as shown on the site plan. Access roadways are required to be a minimum of 20-feet wide with 251-feet inside and 45-feet outside turning radius. All on site roadways shall be painted and signed per city fire lane ordinance. Environmental Impact Comments: 1 . The fire mitigation fees are applicable at the rate of $0.52 per square feet of total buildinglarea: 70,827'square feet x $0.52 = $36,830.04. CT:ct jcr City of . ...:;;I Department of Planning/Building/Public ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DbvCOMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 19,2 ,OO APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-186,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 5,2000 APPLICANT: John C. Radovich Development Company PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: South 4105 Place WORK ORDER NO: 78620 '441 Jr 7 Fr 2000 LOCATION: 900 Block of�SW 16th StreetA. i;,-.- SITE AREA: 2.9 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 70,827 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 70,827 sq.ft.office building with three stories of office over one floor ofgarAge parking. Access to the site would be from one driveway off of SW 161 Street. A total of 197 parking stalls are proposed, including -34 garage spaces. There is a wetland area,approximately 1,850 sq.ft.in size,located in the northwest corner of the site. The wetland report states it is a Category 3 wetland and hydrologically isolated and therefore exempt from wetland regulations. The applicant proposes to use the wetland area as a flood storage pond. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water I Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources I Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED!COMMENTS S I Ls- i 5 005314/V 4 j O 7Tn-ems'} v l�2 L fit', /Hv r� zv�v C_C.) . C� e OL- 0153 . i r G2 l L. f t-✓' YV)y� 1 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviemoiLhis application with particular attention to those areas irr which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas w e additional in 'on is needed to properly assess this proposal. V/ /c�LJ Signature of recto o Jorize Representative Da e routing Rev.10/93 City of _, !on Department of P anning/Building/ ks • ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: s or-f m COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 19, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-186,SA-A,ECF PATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 5,2( ' APPLICANT: John C. Radovich Development Company l?ROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen �"' REIp PROJECT TITLE: South 405 Place WORK ORDER NO: 78620 . JAN 05 2000 LOCATION: 900 Block of SW 16th Street 8t jIL • I Cl it vU OI SITE AREA: 2.9 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 70,827 sq.ft. VISION SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 70,827 sq.ft.ofce building with three stories of office over one floor of garage parking. Access to the site would be from one driveway off of SW 16 Street. A total of 197 parking stalls are proposed, including 31 garage spaces. There is a wetland area,approximately 1,850 sq.ft.in size, located in the northwest corner of the site. The wetland report states it is a Category 3 wetland and hydrologically isolated and therefore exempt from wetland regulations. The applicant proposes to use the wetland area as a flood storage pond. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air _ Aesthetics Water Light/Glare _ Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals _ Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS <e-- ,(49 v z"' is • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas ip which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. l Signature of Director or Authorized Representative / Date routing Rev.10/93 John C. Radovich D velopment Company South 405 Place 900 Block of SW 16th St. Developm nt Services January 19,2000 TRANSPORTATION: 1. The transportation Mitigation charge is $ 1,575.00. See attachment for estimated daily trips and'calculated mitigation fee. 2. Off site improvements required is a 5-foot .lanter strip between the curb and sidewalk and a 5- foot sidewalk. 00cm004T 00CM004T.DOC\ 397• . • MainingliNTRANSPORTATIGITIVIITIGATIMPEEmonam.rI,..S::.nv\}•:.w,�r}....::i:::::v;.......r. ...}.......:}.r rn:i::n4.r..:::::....n ::}:.•:}f�::: m Project Name • 5,201)1 1405 Place a1Kricc 5,419 Project Address 400 5 u) l Lth St. Contact Person . ce_c{ 1)4VidSOV/ Address Ze..Uvc /a&k(/,clf Dev, Cv. ) ZVUU - /zq - ',tve AiE) Bellevue crFOOS Phone Number 4z5 - y5y - 6060 Permit Number L-UA - qq- Project Description LI Srtovil G -G•C 1419 (7O)827 c.f. ;fca/) art o e 1/067 c)-4ucw c . 53,5q s .±. lea slilJile scr, 1q7 fkq sAaces r Land Use Typ',e: Method of Calculation: Geieval Dice (710) ❑ Residential 1.SrITE Trip Generation Manual C 1'1 Ec(i t,o;., n /05 0 Retail 0 Traffic Study ) ! Non-retail 0 Other Lo (T) 0.76a ..ii (x) t 3 G yc4 Calculation: A✓e✓9e clai>/c tV`!p5 LN(-•) = 0,76$ Ln ( 53. g`I) -+ 3,6, 54 T = szI cecohi • tviFs At 176 L ;ly �,P • 2zI 57� ov Transportation Mitigation Fee:�l '` /) 5 7 Calculated by: /v 1L '`7 Date: 1/5/co Account Number: • Date of Payment City of Renron Department of tanning I Building/Public'vvuhKs ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPME T APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: A'iiii ',web() COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 19, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA,99-186,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 5,2DEVELOPMCNT CERVICES APPLICANT: John C. Radovich Development Company PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen CITY OF RENTON( PROJECT TITLE: South1405 Place (WORK ORDER NO: 78620 JAN 0 7 2000 LOCATION: 900 Block of SW 16th Street C SITE AREA: 2.9 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 70,827 sq.ft. RECEIVED SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 70,827 sq.ft.off ce building with three stories of office over one floor of garage parking. Access to the site would be from one driveway off of SW 1 r Street. A total of 197 parking stalls are proposed, including 31 garage spaces. There is a wetland area,approximately 1,850 sq.ft.in size, located in the northwest corner of the site. The wetland report states it is a Category 3 wetland and hydrologically isolated afld therefore exempt from wetland regulations. The applicant proposes to use the wetland area as a flood storage pond. A. ENVIRONMENTALIIMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air /' Aesthetics Water 1/ Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources L Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED'COMMENTS • S c(n bn eArd, co,f Y e vi Cc:5 177Pir S C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in,which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposa. // OD Signature of Director or Authorized Repres ntative Date 7 routing Rev.10/93 . 1 y• 1 John C.Radovich Development Company South'05 Place 900 Block of SW 16th St. Environment Review Development Services January 19,-2000 WATER: 1. The,Water System Development Connection charge is $14,336.99. 2. Construction drawings to meet City of Renton drafting Standards. 3. A loop water main is required. The required fire flow is 2500 gpm per the Fire Prevention Department. The proposed 8-inch dead in water main can only deliver 1250 gpm of fire flow. 4. The primary hydrant is to be within 150-feet of the structures, but not closer than 50-feet. The secondary hydrants must be within 300-feet of the structures. 5. The loop water line is to be in a 15-foot utility easement. 00cm4w OOCM004W.DOC\ City of Re:__.. Department of Panning/Building I Public I _� s ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENSar it,/ ta OMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 19, 2000 rr APPLICATION NO: LUA799-186,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 5,20u0'.' r1C nrNITON• APPLICANT: John C. Radovich Development Company PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: South 405I Place WORK ORDER NO: 78620 JAI its J00 LOCATION: 900 Block of SW 16th Street �3UILL��. ..., ; W,,„%,ad I SITE AREA: 2.9 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 70,827 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 70,827 sq.ft.office building with three stories of office over one floor of garage parking. Access to the site would be from one driveway off of SW 16 Street. A total of 197 parking stalls are proposed, including 31 garage spaces. There is a wetland area,approximately 1,850 sq.ft.'n size,located in the northwest corner of the site. The wetland report states it is a Category 3 wetland and hydrologically isolated and therefore exempt from wetland regulations. The applicant proposes to use the wetland area as a flood storage pond. • A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air i Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation !�Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation _ Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas it which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas wh re additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 00,0, Signature of Director or Authorized Represen a Date routing Rev.10/93 0 John C.Radovich Development Company South 4105 Place 900 Block of SW 16th St. Environment Review Development Services January 19,2000 SEWER(Waste Water): 1. The Sewer System Development Connection charge is $0.078 per gross square feet, but not less than $585. Based on the Environmental Review the sewer system connection charge is $9,896.33. 2. If the project produce fats, oils, or grease,;hen an appropriate removal system will be required per plumbing code . 3. Side;sewer line to have a 2%slope to property line. 4. Side'sewer to have a cleanout five(5')feet out from the building and every 100-feet thereafter. 5. A sewer backflow prevention device is required for the sewer line only when the floor elevation is below 25-ft. STORM DRAINAGE: 1. The Storm System Development Conne?tion charge is $0.129 per square foot of new impervious surface area,but not less than$ 85. Based on the Environmental Review submittal the storm drainage connection charge is $9,721.31. 2. Vertical profile of retention pond facilities to be shown on construction plans. 3. Use NAVD 1988 datum for elevations. 4. Please indicate the vertical datum for all elevations. The T.I.R. report states the FEMA 100- year flood elevation is 16.58, which we assuming is in the datum NAVD 88 (same as the plans). This is incorrect. The FEMA map in the report shows a floodplain elevation of 16.00 (NGVD 29)which converts to El. 19.58 (NAVD 88). we believe the elevation 16.58 that is being used in the report comes from the City hydraulic/hydrologic model which more accurately computes the 100-year flood elevation. The City requires the finished floor elevation to be 1.0 foot above the FEMA 100- year',flood elevation of 19.58 (NAVD 88),or 20.58 (NAVD 88). Compensatory storage is calculated using the elevation from the City's model for the 100-year, future condition,flow that is 16.58 (NAVD 88). Applicant must verify compliance wi FEMA National Flood Insurance Program Requirements regarding finished floor of a parking garage set below the FEMA 100-year flood elevation of 19.58 (NAVD 88). OOCM004S.DOC\ 4 Please provide a drawing showing the pre- d post-developed drainage paths as well as a time of concentration calculation sheet, clearly s owing your methodology and any assumptions. we question the pre-and post-developed p flows in the detention sizing calculations. Why is the time of concentration of 10 minutes the same for both the pre- and post-developed condition? Based on the existing site desc ption(lightly forested with light underbrush and the accompanying photographs)the pre-develo ed Tc should be longer than 10 min. and certainly not equal the post-developed Tc. In additi n, a Tc of 10 min. for post-development seems too long given the majority of the flow path is pipe flow. Please revisit. Final plan set will need to include a detent on pond and storm drain profile showing all utility crossings. The conveyance system design and analysis must include hydraulic gradient calculations. 5. The hydraulic gradient computations for the conveyance system design don't include any analysis of the pipe segment between CB4 to CB3. 00cm004S 00CM004S.DOC\ City of RL....,,n Department of Planning/Building/Public ;s ENVIRONMENTAL 8, DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Arietyrf COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 19, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-186,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 5,2000 APPLICANT: John C. Radovich Development Company �O• PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: South 405 Place WORK ORDER NO: 78620 LOCATION: 900 Block of SW 16th Street SITE AREA: 2.9 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 70,827 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 70,827 sq.ft.office building with three stories of office over one floor of garage parking. Access to the site would be from one driveway off of SW 16 Street. A total of 197 parking stalls are proposed, including 31 garage spaces. There is a wetland area, approximately 1,850 sq.ft.in size, located in the northwest corner of the site. The wetland report states it is a Category 3 wetland and hydrologically isolated and therefore exempt from wetland regulations. The applicant proposes to use the wetland area as a flood storage pond. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare ( - Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet .. --R---a.i trilh 14,000 Feet — Nihe B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS / al) _ 0.11AA., 14.640. JILAISiAA:AitAli6.° Ilk 4 644VIZ4.44 1644-#."1". "'t ill Ate. ? u4i) A4AAA41 ti4A. t1T' A51 . We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional info ion is needed to properly assess this proposal. Jo 7 Zoo° Signature of erector or Authorized Representative Date " routing Rev.10/93 ', .. u,jiI ,IutiiIp >a A JJL F , I I 1 L ,----- jgcli-;;;-5-/ : i . 1 3 ILL '.\\. :* , ,a 5. c.' /- . M N " • alit 1 mot` Nig1 • I___ , I r ic • .t r •,, i 1 . .1 , ,,,,, ,, . r _lJds rj, r �r J \ J Nk ", 710 ....---i...112 ._. Agi i. . li, ,,...13-rxw...,,.,=---,.. ? , 40-1„ --; - \ ._. , ..4:„., I f-ini I '$,KY. k!,?e, .... ; 'ea 63-01:11°. N \ r - I;6114CW44P 5:5E8 Vt.'S ... . *- -‘ --VI-411 ....,10- griii. - iipiraird . . . IL ,.,A ■ ♦ •st 'r` twat ' - ,- w 4400.40,,,, L__''MM �� c. iill Mail )i:.. . ® 441/10P6 � f, g . 1` a1 � ,Q/r tillrlii,k NPMal\):'*1:111-`. .,..,;,.. . NIMMIllidli" -_, . SI/ ;,_. 1 07.„, .. . 1134 4. 1,(/, . ..T, ,...laimir! 1 , ' eff , -Or n Alai , !l ® :; ® ' ik a %-. dia L5i 1Ocl ,t1 e.•l‘ , 1i,kII_ -a1 DlYk O•l,f,M-',.At.-. rrzar-' Y..-1!1 Y mr LIl�1T111�� ._,6,.I4 7&9..1,_-4.+r..'1s.4 1' !\ GIDL7IID\�1iL*ini11i11aNiI1.1.1,1111 , 11? 1 141W.,,,.1_."...-,1,1:I,FJi-,y,-.Aa w -\.\.\az4.4lb 4 1- t ® a.T C.YI 1 r �-ki 1 r: i,,II,'i • tart , .4 a .I ,I EL:. ii..4?„0-.)7 . . . • Wu; ril_Difin.1111.111/ilit\:DC=11 ,ildirrti;„;-----1--. Li,ji--0 .14Nr‘kr.,._ ;ty 6d\k , '" IIIMII no • --:-." ::-.7-7.-7-r:- :::::::---:-: ;ILMJ inn.--trict.,„:,,,Irl j 1 " - is ishaip �' iiiii;I :L�� _ __ ____ISI_. 1J la" i` 4:::::::::-E:-;:-.:_:-.:F.a r 1 p _-'_=-_ _=__-===__=__==_=-______--== ___.� - C AIL -:::32::::;E:-:::::::::::::-.7-:-:.-:-:-:-:-:-.::::::::::::: _,t--4...7._:_:_:_:_:_:_:_____:-. _____, Ill 6 7, fULI .. Fili_ __=_==__=_=_==== _============_ __ --_-____'-- ffi�tt� ' 'Vii_L.:'' -"-. till I IL--I, -:-:-:-:-:-:::-:-:-:.-:-.7-:-:-- -::,..._ri s iii , N al ' -\4., 41,T ggw' ibiNgs.K.-.::::.::::=K:E:F.:::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::-.K:E:E:::E:::::::::.:::::::::::::::::__--:-:-:::::::]:K.::::::::,..ff:::, ::::::::::::::::: 11 0 il v. :__ = = _==_=_t _ _ =_`t 1, , r ' ,' ILL----... - , gric...k. ativ. .__:_:_,_:_:_:_:_:_:_:_,_,_,_:_::::::_:_,_::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::„,::::::::::::::_::::::::; ________„:„.„,:„:„.„.„:„..,......„..______, _, • •__,, ..„. . ` - , ___..____ ________ __ :_-__ ._ _-- ____ __ _ _ ___________ \r �Tg— I ..... . � JlJJA<V _ - _AYAIYJ!lAYYJJJJAV __ __ = _ -__ __ _® .SY„I.i.i - - :YEfS 7 ----::::-KEs:aff."--*:::::::--:::-:-::::::^:-:f::::::::--E:-6-f::-f-::_-::E_:::::::_:-::„:::::-:::„:::::2::..E::,7:::.:K:::::_::::::t::5::8::E::::E::E:::,:_::E::-:.H:::::::-:::::::::::::W::-::::::::Ki:k:::-:..„:,:-:0K-:::::K-::„.-:- -_-:..KL::E-::.:.:E-_H:H_:::::_„E--::-_„:-:K::_-,--_-_:e.. P ik.c ie.9 $rri, .m.IL- .1' --•� NiVJ = _ lam 1 _ =S�_ ooO I1f(�i r ^ /'/-,fir -__ ♦ _/'I - __ _ t n s \`._1-J _ /_='t_= _ _ h,/1a.---�,1111n��rr1 'n��� l — - _- -____—_- - -_ �—__ —11 r " .r) I V . JcaIc I" = ZUU , ;,. .. •' -!2.i _ 7.—~It_ 1. • J A ' Wo, , S 4 3 s J 1 ' I ��` �br1 6 J w"1 °F Y A R A� 1 1113j- 012 J_' for `9. 14 is 0 12, • �� R1G - G 'is " iJ" �•— "^ Iq 20 21 22 11 I �_.:1\\........_,........... CJ VV • — " I 13 12 JI _ � _.—r, s5 56 1`� y .0 19 I I1 16 IS 4I - _.-1—49 r I5i5)L591;14 is 16 IJ� 5 I o_ ,b__ 2Z '`fir4AS '16A1� 1_,Li-L6W-9" "` S.ZI 2� — l3 I , LIGHT �7! I I1.<. . ',�.>. �r. 7 l' 2S - —I g014112 �,J ,b ;_ ��l'1 r I -�' 6 31 ��39 I I J -�o F('� i 6 S 4 3J -�1Z ?''. �, ''��:31132131 ;4 3 3 '"� v r -r1 I • Ir'' 1, II 10 91i IJ � _ ! ] 1 Id 1.- tg i)01 1 IMI T� 'IIT 1 ( qll��11 - 7'r13 24 :S � q �$ • C 10 9 a Lie o i. I4 IS 16 12 -------.P IS f4 I3 12 »>»».,� w , - r 11 lb �r� 4 �ra soS151 � SSSf� �� . q '20 Li 6 2� �n ?)1 I- ;fin �r-t- r_�r-�' • • J�J s---r.T err----;-_,. -•:--.-;:: r..,.....,-_,:i.z.., ,„ r.Cfss �w e _Y ... ..T.30r rr i _._._lilts. ilts.f l6 1_4w c L • r 1 , 0;, ' , '3',t,,., SITS , t� as_ _ __ -woo ' ° . \'"t'� �r In^ .1 d S 4� 10 ±51 It 17 1d:s —6I .;.der o I---- l ---f j ' q 12 II 10 •'� 72 v 1. TT��yy��::1� I T Q ' El v. ' Y'61_ - -isser-?- - --1 �S'_J „ 1 - - I10_9_04YIz/'�1CANT 1 - \ o Y4 IS I6 I] Ill 1��9����2..0�� 2t��2,,t2y2.3r�24/ 2So�, 110 .I 22 23 74 15 `173031 3j' 1 f I I MLJ O 1 IS I 1.� S % I r.;1 1 1n �� P r ., J L 4 r • to .4fij' 60' v V. J 1f 16TH ST 1 a , id ' 1 • 1 r I.. ,' - •i� t� .. 1 1 , .o. A. ,X, '_ -fA .r-1 i_•1 L.1.-,i , /. v, • 'A'of • 1,S 1 1 ICI I 1 I\ I (. . I I I I I I -;'I � 1 I ' �i ' I '._ 1 i,• i- 1.. i •. . '.i„i• 1...i: i; i- 1 n''- - ';f 1 r-1 _' 1 �,-(_ � i- 1 �, . DA) E 1 '1 1 "� .i_ 4,i1 11.E --1' r' 1`-t' 1" I I ��-i-�—��t: V1 -► I I I i I I I` i I 1 ! ,, 9 _ _L 1 1 1_ t.! �.If�._ II. 11 1 -l_L_ J_ 1 J._1_ I_ 1 _tip I �9 �/_V ___ __ _I_ - Q - _ :!-.$4.t1_-_� Z \ rs`_ _ _ .ic..td .�./ gig 5�s •:= I "•3— —• - - - --�- :.-..1 '1 \\ . __- ;6 v'.Lty_ - ._. _ •"__1_ I' --7 '__ -—_ - _A ff__ 3 Id \\\'-, _•..,:2: . _ , ,.. Li 1 4i r .). X TF"s _. ____6_• . -t p•__- — 1 ;, . \ . ____t_.l.N__ .1_\ —•J4Q�__ - -------7il1%its ---- �_- I� � I. =.,—�'�- '1 a/.tit_ Q ---- - -j� _ /1 a:>✓ _ 0 0 g S. ely. , . \ ... C-,-*". .. 1__ _Joc,�__1 ' � 1qs_:_ I .�' __ ag✓\ , !---1 ' 41 'I--- —L1GL1 _INDUSTRkAL. _�cn---1� ! �zP p I,I ,/ -- / �ttso_ i't 1%l iiy . 26 aelGttS 1 I i 91 b CITY OF.RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION LIST OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY."OWNERS. within 300 feet of the subject site PROJECT NAME: South 405 Place APPLICATION NO: LOA•99 • Ie(D Stock i C(p The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADD SS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER MSI 800 S.W. 16th, LLC 1109 First Avenue, Suite 500 334040-6430 Seattle, WA 98101 Benaroya Capital Company 1001 -4th Avenue, Suite 4700 334040-5300 Seattle, WA 98154 Bitney Grouws Company 108 Factory Aver. No., Suite 1 334040-6120 Renton, WA 98055 Cummins NW, Inc. 811 S.W. Grady Way 334040-6625 Renton, WA 98057 Sheperd Investings, Inc. 335 - 116th Av4ue S.E. 334040-7100 Bellevue, WA 98004 City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way 334040-5305 Renton, WA 98055 7301.001 [BD\jss] FILE No. 331 10/19 '99 14:19 ID:JOHN C RADOVICH 4254539740 PAGE 15 (Contin4 ed) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Applicant Certification I,• B TS1 I��l C1 - , hereby certify that the above list(s)of adjacent property • (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: CI City of Renton Technical Services Records ri Title Company Records 111 King County Assessor's Records """` gT lJ® .°`�� N vi In) Signed . l/ /1 pate 1a //l( �4�' ioN to% 0 (Ap icant) A :a NOTARY m: _' NoT_AR1(. •. r°UBl_IC ATTESTED; Subsc ibed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, In and fita� =•fie ct� , rtgtoA, residi t �Q� on the\' &day of c�a‘ ! �N�?= , 19"l-: signs b �>\ .&\\c\,V. 1(-) (Nctury Public) • „f i�7r••r• ..k......Ahinrtr•...i•Y:.:.s:;it•Y;c;•:;•.nYY:.�>:::..,..::.:...:.:..�: :�::r:':r;,!e}.:...........:... !::.. �. ::•i::::i#:�•.�:• >srr 3'•izi>i 3#'!.. s;};,, ;f.•,°:����?"i���"i''�if%i:'•!`�'��iis:#f;:`:t' 'i}i•: �r C•rr�r E R'i"£.'��i��s':5 <ai:i•:';i``.r':!''i::::`:�r:5.:.::t:;C.:�::::`cr r::�::i��:r.:�::' :�,7Y::.:7>:�Y>77>::,.>::%it.:;.:::Y:.>:.Y..:ii•7>:Y:i,.>::;2. ,:.. ik f is .c. i:iFe'•: %u{:Yj:i Y;:.y� l.i. .,. • .>:��t ::•era: `n f � r • �i 11 q >�v 5: ••r: l��r' Uaii4 ii 7rsi%i00. x,•:..Y'i.!i.:::;.:;..::..:..:;s.s::;2•},r...o:•`.�:::::.};.}y};:Y::::::!.:�'::i;. :.:>:•YY>YY • • Yi^? ,ii•>iii } :::#..:: ':�"e''. die:SS ':•':(..:;.Y:"?:,:::.;':!y!:`: •:lei�:�'i�.:::�i:r';:;::u� .Y:Yt: Y?:}):. !.Y:::<•:<.::i:#:ti:k�Y.:.(}:•:::.7n •. }r}Y>a•xn. ..:<•:<o •'ii:kr',:.:i;.:oY:•'.'ei':�:::r.or;::o::::2::•:.: r�N TAB +:i•'ri� 7f S7 t•7:• �1}4 ME1140. A: ; ::i<.i... ��..... ...... ........�. ........m:�b.��p.,,.�n a. a a • ;:,.;�pl'lc� ..and l�ta��.�i�a���°.was. �2CQ�<r�'"i'` r::, l U r7r•!�•% ••7� •rrr� it ^7r7' •r7•r2•}: •>�ri7:n : _ IIslprop.dno NOTARY PUBLIC REV o7/eB MARILYN Kf tICHEt� - STATE OF WASHINGTON 2 COMMISSION EXPIRES • MY APPOIt 1Ti‘IIENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 - JUNE-29, 2003 - r �J\SY -" • Proposed Mitigation Measures Used for Project Mitigation: • • The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation �'s y Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. .4 Nirr0S 1.Traffic Mitigation Fee•575.00 per new average daily trip attributed to the proposal. NOTICE OF APPLICATION 2.Fire Mitigation Fee•$5.52 per new square foot of new construction. AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED(DNS, M) Comments on i agave applicationmustbe submitted inwlUng to Peteio sen,Project Manager,DevelopmentServicesDivision,t O5uthGradyWay,Renton,WA 98055,by5:00 PM on Jary21,2000.IIyou have questionsabout thisproposal,orwto be made a party ofrecord and receive additionalcaon by mail,contact the ProjectManager.Anyone whoits written comments will automatically hecome a part record and will be notified of any decision an DATE: January 05,2000 This project LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-186,SA-A,ECF CONTACT PERSON: PETER ROSEN(425)430-7219 APPLICATION NAME: SOUTH 405 PLACE OFFICE BUILDING PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposal to construct a 70,827 sq.ft.office building with three stories of office I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I over one floor of garage parking.Access to the site would be from one driveway off of SW 16'"Street.A total of 197 parking stalls are proposed,Including 31 garage spaces: - There is a wetland area,approximately 1,850 sq.fL in!size,located in the northwest corner of the site. The wetland report states it is a Category 3 wetland and hydrologically Isolated and therefore exempt from wetland regulations.The applicant proposes to use the wetland area as a flood storage pond. , PROJECT LOCATION: 900 Block of SW 16°i Street • OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS,M): As the Lead Agency,the City of e,� Ly,n T c e ,-.,, ! V i INDUSTRIAL "9-L I' Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. I i / I'pI� E. - IrJ` U (,.- Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton Is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give ( I —..-= '�-'I ,_._____,PARK so I ji-�- c '�"`+S �- notice that a DNS-M Is likely to be Issued.Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into : I i ^L s I 0 -- --. - a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the Issuance of the Threshold Determination of :1 i •• r•, e e ,Yi e e 1 : '-• rr Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M).A 14-day appeal period will follow the Issuance of the DNS-M. -.f L S.•-L., •t 1 n - :I .- E j e„Y, 4 a, ,, , PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: December 22,1999 :7 � NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: January 05,2000 : • Ye_4. • l&�" c` • PermitsiReview Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review;Administrative Site Plan Approval T 1 ' 55 _,••;"•00510 Jq;� APP 1 ,' f:: _• 1j r l' 6_I:i $ Other Permits which may be required: Construction and Building Permits dp ,= •q-Cw•`'�` '� S00•urY :. ,.; ::...L; ��.�rx�,�IVY l •• I . ►" `-. _l i ' ...,-oFe iWy r" ,r a. ..,nr' -�e er,_° .�� 'I,, Requested Studies: Wetlands Report,Drainage Study,Geotechnical Study,Traffic Report f� c E� Q � ' S - Location where application may _ �� ;S,g_• \� Jr'j� be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, '/ � 2, •O�,�G • ��/ �r - 1055South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 >~' j'------ - " '\r�i e q� j; '• 'I; .r ,, ND sTNIRL.•rsiviiiiit •`l ° '• — PUBLIC HEARING: A public hearing is not required.Administrative review only. _ aesal�s'oi. r_ 1 ll '�rT•+ SITE :i.; I CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: R / Analytical process II _J- "�'o'sw rene,i I b ova.« =s( .- E,a--1'...,., {: Project consistency refers to whether a project is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or in S'� � their absence,comprehensive plan polices. RCW 36.f a projectprovidess (NOA)consistency with the type of land use,level of _ '••, .t�'p,G'• •• j;,f_: :_:$,,._;� i - IC. i- - pgi development,infrastructure,and character of development if one has been made at the time of notice. At a minimum, / p�C7r:� •;.-;- :w-•¢7 1 nI I I - , I lily every NOA shall include a determination of the projects consistency with the zoning,comprehensive plan and j f'I,f�;Cy„cl��„�EIAI��; '+' '?� L, l development regulations. "-' �•-, F ttu I , I� P 9 •, �pI Land Use: The subject site is zoned Commercial Office(CO). Offices(administrative ---_--' .j lam-. _ -if'-I - - • I f 1 head uarters,i professional,medical and dental)are allowed as a primary , G. ;{ _ •• permitted uses In the CO zone. The proposa complies with develpmet yW 'i, t t' ,-• av _i. i -rye i J _ _ I�h standards of the CO zone, r •''�• •-'i re"p II -{•:. =:-_ Environmental Documents that Environmental Checklist F ; C__C=' 11I'1� / __ •'_ :_1�_-`:4 4 -_�-I'' • Evaluate the Proposed Project: I `�8 , --- - •-• •-` ..-,-..... '1I% L'r' t.--r 1' �f ==L�tr�i�7 'it,• Development Regulations y UsedForProjectMitigation: The proposal will be subject to the City's Environmental Ordinance.Zoning I • NEIGHBORHOOD MAP Code.Subdivision Ordinance.Public Works Standard's,etc. These adopted - a_r•-�-1 y codes and standards will function to mitigate project impacts. Room of apptrallof oo notice of apppGtioR . --- -___ _ _ _r---________ ' CERTIFICATION I, Q___,k-eS RC -R , hereby certify that -3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on . Jar S � o . Signed: , ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public,in and for a State of Washington residing i l } Ltz„t,-G." , on the 149"1- day of ()Ivry �49-&-d . MARILYN---77Haity_... ,4150.1.1,1c,40,0 KAMICHEFF NOTARY PUBLIC MA4;IIym KAMCHEFF STATE OF WASHIN�aT®N MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 COMMISSION EXPIRES JUP9 29, 2003 NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINrATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS, M) DATE: January 05,2000 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-186,SA-A,ECF APPLICATION NAME: SOUTH 405 PLACE OFFICE BUILDING 51 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposal to construct a 70,827 sq.ft.o ice building with three stories of office over one floor of garage parking. Access to the site would be from one drivewa off of SW 16th Street. A total of 197 parking stalls are proposed,including 31 garage spaces. There is a wetland area, approximately 1,850 sq.ft. in size, located in the northwest corner of the site. The wetland report states it is a Category 3 wetland and hydrologically isolated and therefore xempt from wetland regulations. The applicant proposes to use the wetland area as a flood storage pond. PROJECT LOCATION: 900 Block of SW 16th Street OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS, IAA): As the Lead Agency, the City of • Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using',the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: December 22,1999 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: January 05,2000 Permits/Review Requested: , Environmental(SEPA)Review;Administrative Site Plan Approval Other Permits which may be required: Construction and Building Permit) Requested Studies: Wetlands Report,Drainage Study,Geotechnical Study,Traffic Report Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98655 PUBLIC HEARING: A public hearing is not required. Administrative review only. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Analytical process Project consistency refers to whether a project is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or in their absence, comprehensive plan policies. RCW 36.70B.110(2)(g) provides that the Notice of Application (NOA) include a statement of the preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use, level of development, infrastructure,and'character of development if one has been made at the time of notice. At a minimum, every NOA shall include a determination of the project's consistency with the zoning, comprehensive plan and development regulations. Land Use: The subject site is zoned Commercial Office (CO). Offices (administrative headquarters, professional, medical and dental) are allowed as a primary permitted uses in the CO zone. The proposal complies with development standards of the CO zone. Environmental Documents that Environmental Checklist Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The proposal will be subject to the City's Environmental Ordinance, Zoning Code, Subdivision Ordinance, Public Works Standard's, etc. These adopted codes and standards will function to mitigate project impacts. • notice of application , J_ Proposed Mitigation Measures Used for Project Mitigation: The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. 1.Traffic Mitigation Fee-$75.00 per new average daily trip attributed to the proposal. 2.Fire Mitigation Fee-$0.52 per new square foot of new construction. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Peter Rosen,Project Manager,Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on January 2l1,2000. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: PETER ROSEN (425)430-7219 I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I 392O ,, „�•Y\�, T E C H: N Ii'•,,:;_"{.' , 1.3.j `I��IIi 1> > INDUSTRIAL 1: - -i , ip11 re -\'1,` °ma N PARK NO.I' i l- „"• �t,c: V e N i I •1 ?•' .W 5 l a O I ` ' [ ,I\r ., C E N T'r 1'E R - .., , j 't -... I, , - r,� J — -+�'' ;.,... , . ... .: ,,. r 0 ..ti 6 ),( b..:F-_—... E 1. ... ,, ••0 0 ,,,....r fir' 1 1;• 1 - ", ‘ . I s+ ,orx a °:rnb� sr. fli ,:.: � T 0r P. L ���y1 E z 1 107. ,7.„,dzoiraw,N:V;litlioal.."',, : :-.1 0:14,,,"J!. .• .. A e"" /..� i/ " I:; iir ' \ �- I jOFFIEr �57- : 1~��LrC ii •°na•cIU I I '" • ' - �_ � rr- ' 1 v1 Y I,.�I/ • r iERSTTE.NW.-.A % �.-- . Gr ip.Hit < _ kl4r: ;; p S ;r.1,P ZI• L'---c_- ji! 1. SIt L � � .r_ 43 6: .1 ' : . , IEAIICAPEM • S.W. T : a ..1 •r�','t� ;._I� 0� .i 1 ISITE .r I , i. I If ig Q• .' f jI_ r.� r0 SW 6TH moo .•"F*, ai � w�. v 1,I4 I r a • -• at•. ...�I" _ -V i,1,,F .,4.,rd OFFICE • :C ;C� I� ERCIAI`...,A ". .y-11 • t; r1 FIC --.Sp. .1 ` I i. 1:„,,,, :riil lam', Lp. v + - -__ mla I in�, ' _ _ _ - �• sr ,srH sr. I, `I d i 'i '.`1 �• • :i _ I + Go i Mu_.1 ...1:-."-':'..:_:_::.�• -j-- r `� lil1j • wog i ,, A i ::.:::_._.: ..,.....,_ ,, , e,,,, .- . ...,.&;.- -= ... . k ...... .ui"--. ,.,:. , . __,:.:,-3: •..k.-:: 9-. :-. ;.4: \\ �`^ 'l;:' l.co \ li tr% \YI /I / y. W. __-r ,:, ra;- .i-i 1.4'' • I NEIGHBORHOOD MAP4115 0 e00 •00 NORTH notice of application •,> CITY _-')F RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator January 4, 2000 Ms. Rebecca Davidson John,C. Radovich Development Company 2000,—124th Avenue NE, B-103 Bellevue, WA 98005 SUBJECT: South 405 Place Office Bui ding Project No. LUA-99-186,SA-A;ECF Dear.Ms. Davidson: The Development Planning Section of the pity of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submttal requirements and, therefore,,is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on February 1, 2000. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your applic tion. Please contact me, at(425)430-7219, if you have any questions. Sincerely, 6)A\ct.t . Peter Rosen Project Manager • cc: Susan McLeod, Stuart C. Ness, Steven A. Ness/Owners • acceptance 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 This paper contains 50%r¢cycled material,20%post consumer tiiiiiimi'f:ONNOMMENINSUIRMERNMEN litili CITY O'F RtE[ TO ' «>.><:€€€.>«< >.>. :».<:>::>:>>;><: >.:...:.:.:...:.:€:>'s.€.>..».:>:>:.:.<:>.:.>:€ ::::<::>::>:::<»: ................ u 'EL. .i . E.7':. 1/I. ..............:i>::..:::><:>::ni!i.:;.:;::;.:::::.:;.s.::<:.<:.<:.>.:;::.,iron<::::iii::i:;.::<.;::: >;> >:::::: i. .............. }:}:i:::: :::::: S i$......U? ':'?i'$i:.r..:::.4ii:::'ii:.::r'y:••::••'•' -•..........................................................................................::ii.:.-.....:••.... }::}:S: .. S•'.> ...... :j.i'F.}••....:: }.....: .:....:ii. .::;ii ff:'i ;ii:ii!:::::::i::iiiii::i::iti:}:ii'•:i:::::iiii::i::i::i}5::�:::ii::i::i::... .....�. .� � /3 sisti:: :::::i::i::::};.::L.{i:C:ii::i::i::::;:ji>;t;iiii;:ii:::ii: 1..?;:;ii::$:::�::�:f:::::t::�:ii:(:ini:..v.>.:;:::::}::::?:vS!;ii>.iY'::{{:;:11$: .... T.... .......E.........i.R... .11.A. .p.......„p......t.:.:.:11C.. A.. IT:::, :::::10,11111111011.Iiiiiii.: iliti.„.....111.1.1pi �'� � •• PROotitit itiwat;:::•:«:.:liii »<` > ><'minsii<` N0te: If'there.is more than one le.'-al ownei '.ease attach ar additional.: rxataFizad Maiter.A'pp(itatton.fa each`gVvner . ..i:.:».:.iM::` PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAM : South 405 Place NAME: Susan McLeod, Stuart C. Ness and Steven A. Ness - - - • OMCg el/ /N& PROPERTY/PROJECT ATRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: 6645 North Ensign 9001(S�/°1600th Street Reri6.on, WA 98055 CITY: Portland ZIP: 97217 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 334040-6261-06 334040-6260-07 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 503-978-2100 EXISTING LAND USE(S): :.:.;;;::.;::.; Vacant Land PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: John C. Radovich General Office COMPANY(if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Employment Area Valley ADDRESS: 2000 124th Avenue NE, B-103 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): N/A CITY: Bellevue ZIP: 98005 EXISTING ZONING: • CO. Commercial Zoning TELEPHONE NUMBER: 425-454-6060 • PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): • N A • SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): NAME: Rebecca Davidson DEVELOPMENT PLANNING 2.9 Acres CITY OF RENTON DEC 24 1999 • COMPANY (if applicable): . PROJECT VALUE: John C. Radovich Development Company $7 000 000 `-'ECEI ED ADDRESS: 2000 124th Avenue NE, B-103 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? No CITY: Bellevue ZIP: 98005 ' IS-THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY - SENSITIVE AREA? - - - TELEPHONE NUMBER: - 425-454-6060 - No - • , . S::sisC:ii:v:::i`::iiiii}iiii::ii::i::i:i:'ri�'::::.;:v.:::;:"•ii:>'::.}':::.�:;.y::.� t.:;:;::••'•:::::(:i::::: :::}•.:.::::.y::::::...:.......:..�...�:"l;L;i:ii:;:i:'i:ii:{fi;%}j- {Y'1.iii;isj'i:;:iii:i':;S:i':'}::v:}}i:::j':::j'}ii:j'i::ii::i:::y:::::.'.:i::i::i::ii::::::::::::::j?:::i.'.`<::;:vLLt::j::}ji��. • _ANNEXATION $ • SUBDIVISION: _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ • _ REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _ SPECIAL PERMIT $ _ SHORT PLAT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ _CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT 5 _SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ • _ FINAL PLAT $ _GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: ) • PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ _VARIANCE • $ (FROM SECTION: ) — PRELIMINARY _WAIVER $ _ FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT _ $ _ ROUTINE VEGETATION • MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: _SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ _ VARIANCE $ _ EXEMPTION $No Charge _ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ REVISION • $ I, (Print Name) ,declare that I am (please check one)_the owner of the property involved in this application,_the authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization),and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. • • • ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me,a Notary Public,in and for the State of residing at (Name of Owner/Representative) , on the_day of 19 (Signature of Owner/Representative) (Signature of Notary Public) ��oiri I.e...et �.. . .b.>` Cit Stesta ` ` '' "`> »>>> ><'>»'< < '>` > >> »'»'<> `<?' ` :-::::> : >:::::::>::>::::»:<::<::«<::<::>:::>::>:::«:»::<:<:>::> .......:......:.... .t....)=ile.: lum)Sir..::,... ...::::::.:..:..::::::..:::::A:..:k:.:CS.::: ....:....:.:....:..:............................................................................................................................... ;:.;:::•:•;::.;;;:.;>:.:. ;;:.: ..-;;::.;::5; :::..•.>:; S P.V.if 5P SM<: $11V.I. . A. . V:.) .....V:.H.....W..... ::.;:.;'.:::.::.::.:::.:'MH.P..:..(:.PUt�..,...Ef�_PF;R,:.:��j.�flVff*..::�SA..A.::::�/1:�:::::..:HPL.�:::.:. .H I?!.....V... .... ..:...:.............. r�.l'I li........... ..... .... t {.. !. ............................^!��:'... 1!::..I'....................:•::!..:'.......::�1............ ' :�I ' !...t..tl';11; ��:��':.::..:�: \1.::�........::.:::. ::::•... ::•ii:.y:n?:4:•i}i:.i;:fry:::y:>;:ti�4ii;i;::::;::{:::.}v!:.i:i!::::.�::;:::.::::i:•w::::::•::::::::::::.:::::•::::::�:::?!:.:�:•:::..::::....:......:::•:•::...:...:.:.....:.•��:..:..;.:...:.:;:..:..:......v......i:•ii';r";::•iii::.;;:::.i:•i'•i:•i:•i:•i::::i•iYi:•iiti?4'Jii:i4:>:i:•i:bi:4'4':v}iiiii::4:4ii:•::•i ..........................................................................._. �:::.:::::::::.�:::::::::w::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::v::::::::::::::::::::::::.Y:1f.t.t...,..I":.t'::-..i:iii':ni:{:.i;4}}}ii:ti^:•i:h:iiiiiii:i•i}iiiiii:vvi}: .................................................................................................. MASTERAP.DOC _ REVISED 8/97 _ - - - • ......................... .{nil• .......:......................, ...:..........;...:...::w........:........;••::v:...:.........................:::;...•,r ..,....:::v::::::::.�w::x:::m:...:...........:...........r.r•v..r:..::v:::� ........:•.:•nv:::::.�:%: .. ...:...............:::.::.:n:::.+.::v::::.:�:;:r:.:�: .:.::n:::.:x.n.:.n:v....:::::v.::::.�::?.::•:}:::i:::ii•:.:4:4iii:4ii:0:?.i:}:•iii:::.;4;•in: :•ip�••.•:.rr.:•:::4::•:.�:nv:i•:?v:??4•r,?O;.}}::•};4i:?!n}:•: 4:v:`4:•;;}..??.::.::w:.:::.�:::?C:4..i: •.: :• :?:: .. .: .. :.i .: ..:.+••. :::. .:..::?::.y... ....:. : v :v:::::::::::<fii'?{4Y:?!?• :?.ii}ixiXtinii.^.,}:::i:i:�i?4:i:::iiiii}::is .iv } i. : "v: i. ::'.i: :. :.::. .:4y :.:...a : ti:ii ':}::ii:isi::}::ii:i : :i:.i: PERT>4fii. A t�. h>A $l f0 stfi . . r..:::�:?4:i glii<?.<:. li:. .::....:.. .. ...L� ALi::�]E . : .I.PTI.t3., �<:>P.RE)..::........:.:::.::.......#:.....�......��. .......��....... .1~...........��� �... . • • • <'A. ...... is IG.a�I.�! :::.•: i :�.;,:::t���t::� t. :.:.::�: . :<>$��..f.... . X1:: �e _ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ • _REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _ SPECIAL PERMIT $ _ SHORT PLAT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ x SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ /Otk ,C ) _ FINAL PLAT $ • _GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ VARIANCE • $ (FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY _WAIVER $ FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT • _ $ _ ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ • CONDITIONAL USE _ VARIANCE $ _ EXEMPTION $No Charae x ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ .(X) REVISION • $ I, (Print Name)Rebecca Davidson , declare that I am (please checlt one)_the owner of the property involved in this application, X the authorized representative to act for the property owner(plegi91atjach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted arearWinirgetliatigbi,end correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. 444• . ��yO�ARy' 9�TTEST: Subscr'be, and sworn to before me, a Notary Public,in and Rebecca Davidson : p the S ate of residing at INa f Owner/R• •resentafve) � } , on tne �'day of o pU®`,` 1i 19 • (Si! • • • ature • I ` ner/Representa ive) �e ''••••• / J- "110•1111•• (Sl�natur Notary Public) r:;eted:ibyC t> >:::t,:>tagigg"> > >?<>`>'>2 >><< > <>t > '>>>` ' ?r?> > Tfiiss:e4tiartta:fi�e>';v�m I.et..c�..b ... r:. :.S aff........................................................ ::»::::<<:>:>::>::: >•I . ;:...1)� ��::Nur� r.::>::.::�:...:...:::::.::....::::::::::::::i>::::.A:::::AAI7.:::::E3.Si?::<:;:.>:At�>5..... AP. ...... P........ ..A...... 0:.1�:::...I=>r ...... i:.ii:.ir.:.iiii:.i:.iii:??.;;:.;:.i:.i::.:�.;.::::.i.:.i:.:: :::.:?.i:?.::.:;::.i:.i'::::..:i:.i:.i:.:••.�.:..::.:?.ii:..�:.;:.>:.>;:.::.;>:?::::.;:<.�::;<.::.ii;:;:::. ::.i?.;::. .i:::;::r.;':.::.i::: : .�:::.:>:;ii::.i:.??:. i�•?:::.::;<.;i:.iii:. :i:?.:.ii:.i:.;:.i:.i:.;:>:.>ii>i:.;>::;:::>::>:;•::>::»>:: iiii:.ii:.:<•::o>ii:?ex?•i;:4:•iii:.i:.i:.i:.. .. :i:i::::: ::'::::}• •.:::::;. ;:::::::i;:::::i:::::::::::::::::{;:;;::;: T •::::; .::": :;: •. :;:::>:::: >:::::;:::«:»»::>>:<:»::»::>::>:<::::.:•>::. i;:::. >i:: ; i:.. .:::;>.:?.:.ii;;:.i;:;:i:.i:.>:.:.>:.i:;i:::::.::. .i:::. :.;::: .;: ;b .. .?.>;: :i::: :.:.;.»::::>::;<::>::>:>::>::::;::>::::.>:.i:.i:::.i:.;;:.i:.i:.i:.:.:;>:«::::<>::<:::::: .....................................fiflTAL..FSES.....5.....v ... . ..:.::: TQTAC.P.Q.�'CA��:.pROUI...:fin.. �.. .�..................:::::::::.�:::.�:::::.,,.:::::::::::::............... MASTERAP.DOC _ -REVISED 8/97 • SCHEDULE A2 Order No. 394032-5K .DESCRIPTION: • LOTS 1 THROUGH 34 IN BLOCK 36 OF C.D. HILLMAN'S EARLINGTON GARDENS ADDITION. TO THE CITY OF SEATTLE, DIVISION NO. 1, ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 17 OF PLATS AT PAGE (S) 74, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED THOMAS AVENUE SOUTHWEST (83RD AVENUE SOUTH) ADJOINING OR ABUTTING THEREON, WHICH UPON VACATION, ATTACHED TO SAID PREMISES BY OPERATION OF LAW; EXCEPT THE EAST 40 FEET THEREOF, VACATED BY CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE NO. 3195.; EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1 BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 5443689 . Page 1 i 1999 NESS HOLDING COMPANY October 28, 1999 City of Renton Planning Department 1055 South Grady Way Renton WA 98055 . To Whom It May Concern: John C. Radovich and its consultants have our permission to submit for Site Plan Approval a three (3) story, 48,000 square foot office building to be built on our site at 900 SW 16th Street. Please call me if you have any questions. Ver ly your to en A. Ness 503-978-2100 6645 N. Ensign •Portland, Oregon 97217 •Phone:(503) 240-0400 •Fax:(503) 978=2190 Bringing You the :est Since 1939 a i• PROJECT NARRATIVE DEVELOPMENT PLANNING SOUTH 405 PLACE CITY OF RENTON 900 BLOCK OF S.W. 16'STREET RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 DEC 2 2 1999 DECEMBER 20,1999 RECEfiVED 1. Project name, size, and location of site: South 405 Place 900 block of S.W. 16th Street Renton,Washington 98055 Section 24, Township 23, Range 4 East, W.M., King County, Washington Size of Site: 2.9 acres Proposed: 70,827 square foot,four story office building, three stories of office over one floor of covered parking. 2. Zoning designation of the site and adjacent properties: a. Site: CO, Commercial Office b. Adjacent Properties: North: SR-405 South: IM, Industrial-Medium East: IM, Industrial-Medium West: IM, Industrial-Medium 3. Current use of the site and any existing improvements: The subject property is located in the Green RiverJalley portion of the city and is approximately 2.9 Acres in size. The property is generally flat, heavi1jy vegetated, and contains a small wetland in the northwest corner of the site. There are no structures currently on the site. The surrounding area is composed of a variety of commercial and light industrial uses. 4. Special site features(i.e.,wetlands,water bodies, steep slopes): A small lowiquality wetland is located in the northwest corner of the site. The wetland is approximately 1,850 square feet in size. Please see the Wetland Evaluation prepared by B&A, Inc., enclosed with this application for more detail. According to FIRM Map No. 53033C0978F, revised May 16, 1995, approximately one-half of the subject property is within a 100-year floodplain. The floodplain boundary is shown on the submitted plans. 5. Statement addressing soil type and drainage conditions: According to the Soil Conservation Service map for this area, the soil is classified as Urban Land, which is soil that has been modified by disturbance of the natural layers with additions of fill material several feet'thick to accommodate large industrial and housing installations. In the Green River Valley, the fill ranges from about 3 feet to more than 12 feet in thickness and from gravelly sandy loam to gravelly loam in texture. The erosion hazard is slight to moderate. 6. Proposed use of the property and scope of th- proposed development(i.e., height, square footage, lot coverage, parking, access, etc.): The John C. Radovich Development Company proposes to build a 70,827 square foot,four story office building, three stories of office over one floor of covered parking. The proposed building height is 68 feet, 7 inches 9nd the proposed lot coverage is 75% percent. One hundred ninety-seven (197) parking spaces are proposed with access to the site from S.W. 16th Street. 7. Proposed off-site improvements (i.e., installation of sidewalks,fire hydrants, sewer main, etc.): Proposed off-site improvements include the installation of a landscape strip between existing city street curb and new sidewalk on property line. NeYv sidewalk on and off property per city requirements. 2% of wildlife habitat area will be incorporated into landscape areas as well as adjacent wet pond and detention storage areas. Public utilities are currently available at the front of the property. 8. Total estimate construction cost and estimated fair market value of the proposed project: Estimated construction cost: $5,500,000 Estimated fair market value: $7,000,000 9. Estimated quantities and type of materials involved in any fill or excavation is proposed: Approximate fill quantity: 5,350 cubic yards Source of fill: to be determined 10. Number,type and size of trees to be removed. Removal of approximately 233 Scrub,Alder, and Cottonwood trees. Includes 1-7" Fir and 33 trees 12" above in size. A group of 5 Deciduous trees will be saved at freeway, north side of site towards west end. 11. Explanation of any land to be dedicated to the City No land is proposed to be dedicated to the City o:Renton 2 CONSTRUCTION MITIrATION DESCRIPTION SOUTH 405 PLACE The following is a summary of the construction mitigation measures that are proposed for the South 405 Place project in accordance with Item No. 10 of the Site Plan Approval Submittal Requirement Form: 1. Proposed'Construction Dates: Construction of the project is scheduled to begin in Spring 2000, and it is anticipated to be completed by December 200 . 2. Hours of Operation: The hours of operation during construction of the project is anticipated to be from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. or up to the maximum allowable hours of operation approved by the City of Renton. 3. Proposed Hauling/Transportation Routes: Although the haul route for trucking imported fill material and removal of debris and unsuitable material has not yet been determined, it is anticipated that the haul route will be along S.W. 16th Street to East Valley Road,or Lind Avenue S.W.,or as directed by the City of Renton. 4. Measures.to be Implemented to Minimize Dust,Traffic,and Transportation Impacts,Mud,Noise, and Other Noxious Characteristics: Mitigation measures during the construction phase will include an erosion and sedimentation control plan that will include temporary construction entrances, silt fence, ditching, and a sedimentation control pond that will control any site runoff so as not to impact adjacent properties,or nearby water bodies. Water trucks will be provided as required during the construction phase for dust control and flaggers will be available as needed at the site entrances during the trucking operationsi for traffic control. Construction equiment will meet or exceed Washington State emission standards for noise and pollution. In addition, street cleaning and sweeping will be provided on an as needed basis, as determined necessary by the on-site Superintendent and/or City Inspector. DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON DEC 2 2 1999 RECE1‘ E 7301.004[BDS/bsd] MEMO UM To: Ms. Rebecca Davidson The John C. Radovich Com any DEVELOPMENT , Phone: 425/454-6060 CI OFREN oNNNI1 Fax: 425/453-9740 Date: December 21 , 1999 DEC 2 2 V99 From: Christopher Brown, P.E. Re: Renton Office Building REc,Gilv ED South 405 Place Background Check List Items - Traffic In accordance with your request the following are submitted to accompany your submittal to the City of Renton. First, at the October 14th pre-application meeting the city requested a brief report showing the trip distribution. The trip distribution, as a percent of the sites traffic, is attached as Figure 1 . The new traffic generated by this office development will be distributed onto the adjacent roadway system and then onto the regional transportation system. The distribution used in this study to assign project generated traffic is based on the commonly used Analogy Method as described in Transportation and Land Development, Vergil G. Stover, 1988, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Second, the trip generation is estimated on the basis of the commonly used data published by the Institute of Transportation Engineer' s (ITE) under Land Use Code 710 for General Office Buildings per the 6th (most recent) edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual. The data are shown in Table I, below. TABLE I Trip Generation Average Trip Rates Scale 53 .55 ksf Time Period Traffic Volumes A.W.D.T. 590 Trips A.M. inbound 74 v.p.h. A.M. outbound 10 v.p.h. P.M. inbound 14 v.p.h. P.M. outbound 60 v.p.h. Christopher brown es' Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 fax (206) 722-1902.) The above data listed under Table I may be used to answer Check List Item 11 (f) . In terms of the peak hour impacts, they will occur during the morning peak hour between 7 :00 an 9: 00 a.m. and the afternoon peak hour between 3 : 30 and 5 :30 p.m. Third, under Check List Item 11 (g) the city has asked about any . . . proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts. " An appropriate reply would be as follows. The design and construction of the site will include all-weather pedestrian ways to the site frontage and sidewalks along the frontage that will enable easy pedestrian access to the local transit system. In addition, the building foyer will include Sound Transit (Metro) local bus schedules and related transit materials. The owner will also advise future tenants that the nearby Boeing facility has an on-going Van Pool program for commute trip reduction purposes. They may be able to also participate in such a commute trip reduction (Travel Demand Management) program as provided under Washington statutes. Please note that the reduction in peak hour travel demand can range from 10 to 40 percent. Fourth, at the October 14th pre-application meeting you were advised that there would be a traffic mitigation fee of $75 per new trip generated. Usually, this applies to the peak hour. Based on the commute trip reduction program described under Item three, above, the peak hour trip generation can range from 10 to 40 percent so that the peak hour traffic volumes would range from a low to a high volume. The range and average trip generation is expected to be as shown in the following table. Interval High Low Average A.M. inbound 67 44 56 v.p.h. A.M. outbound 9 6 8 v.p.h. P.M. inbound 13 8 11 v.p.h. P.M. outbound 54 36 45 v.p.h. Christopher Brown Cn Associate8 page 2 9688 Rainier Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909/ • Considering the traffic mitigation fee of $75 per new trip generated, this will also range fr m a high to a low sum, as shown below. High Rate Trip Fee $75 X (67 + 9) = $5, 700 Low Rate Trip Fee $75 X (36 + 8) = $3, 300 In keeping with customary procedures, the peak hour traffic rate is used for the above estimates. But, in any event, you should reserve the opportunity to confirm the actual traffic demand after the facility is fully occupied to validate the final, proper trip mitigation fees. Last, while not requested as a check list item we have taken the opportunity to run a preliminary analysis of the level of service at the site' s driveway. It is well within acceptable operating standards with the worst leg not being below LOS 'B' . The results are attached for reference. Christopher brown CS Aggociateg _3_ 9688 Rainier Ave. 8. cattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909 . `23 Interurban Avenue �o �� Q West Valley Hi 4hway c__ • Oaksdale Avenue SW iB 7 rn rt a n cn 0 SITE R, ct �� 1-4m (D N 1-4 cn /3 S Lind Avenue SW `` 2l °o East Valley Road 19 /, FIGURE 1 Trip Distribution in Percent1. Christopher Brown Cn ABaociates 9688 Rainier Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909} Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Relgase 2 . 1 Page 1 ************************************1*************************** File Name JCR-C1P.HCO Streets: (N-S). Access Drive (E-W) 16th Atreet SW Major Street Direction EW Length of Time Analyzed 60 (min) Analyst C. V. Brown Date of Analysis 12/20/99 Other Information Estimated LOS at Driveway, Current Volumes, PM Bak Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound LTRLTRLTRL T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 1 1< 0 0 1< 0 0 0 0 0> 1< 0 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 7 479 0 213 7 31 0 29 PHF .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC's (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 SU/RV's (%) 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 CV's (%) 0 1 0 1 0 - 0 0 0 PCE's 1. 1 1 1. 1 1 1. 1 1. 1 1. 1 1. 1 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2. 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2. 1 Page 2 **************************************************************** WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 216 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1076 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1076 Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.97 Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 220 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1347 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1347 Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.99 Step 3: TH from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 702 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 467 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.99 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 464 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 702 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 415 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.99 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.99 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements . 0.99 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 413 . J Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2 . 1 Page 3 **************************************************************** Intersection Performance Summary FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph Delay LOS By App SB L 36 413 > > > 589 6.9 B 6.9 SB R 34 1076 > > > EB L 8 1347 2.7 A 0.0 Intersection Delay = 0.6 Lct.oric w- • pPteruie•tvtg e.GPey • • CITY OF RENTON AECEI/FO • • MEMORANDUM �EF 30 9999 •tUILuuv(a DIVISION • • DATE; � fz e TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan, Review, Project Planner FROM: Jana Hanson, Development Services Division Director • SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: VCR Date rACUT'( LOCATION: 'TOO or W t��kt sr PREAPP NO. €q A • A meeting with the applicant has been scheduled for �IToV c& 1 , Thursday, l VC)C i . Pt M , in one of the 6th floor conference rooms (new City Hall). If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11:00 AM meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note • only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit• • application submittal. Please submit your written comments to R RO 4 at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. /t/b (3-14 ,-,,ve-1.-a; • 744,11,4 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON DEC 22 1999 RECEIVED Pr�app2 _ . - _ - 1tY O CITY OF RENTON A FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 4, ale • MEMORANDUM ,NTO • DATE: October 1, 1999 • TO: Peter Rosen, Senior Planner FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector • SUBJECT: Preliminary comments for JCR Office Facility 1 . The preliminary fire flow required is 2,500 gpm. Three fire hydrants are required: One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the structure and the secondary hydrants are required within 300-feet of the structure. lay. s„vias 3— 441,-44-12 bI4. 2. The fire mitigation fees are applicable at the rate of $0.52 per square feet of total building area: Pat art 4 k` G 'ek"n• "p 50,000 square feet x $0.52 = $26,000 4905 ' 13 'r' 4- 3. An approved fire sprinkler and standpipe system shall be installed throughout the structure. 4i! 3 S rLA'3TV 4. An approved fire alarm system shall be installed throughout the structure. 5. Fire department apparatus access is required within 150-feet of all points on the building. An approved fire department apparatus turn around is required on the north side of the building (See attached example). Access roadways are required to be a minimum of 20-feet wide with 25-feet inside and 45-feet outsid turnin radius. All on site roadways shall be painted and signed per city ire lane ordinance ( ee attached requirements). CT:ct jcr • JCR OFFICE FACILITY 900 BLK OF SW 16th St. Pre-Application October 14, 1999 WATER: 1. A 12-inch water main is available in SW 16th St. 2. There will be a System Development Connection charge for water is $0.113 per gross square foot of of site ,but not less than$850. 3. One fire hydrant is required for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow. Each fire hydrant deljyers , ��h�c 1000 gpm of fire flow. Fire Prevention office determines the required fire flow. ..._ 3 $"►'�e y 4. The primary hydrant is to be within 150-feet of the structures,but not closer than 50-feet. The secondary hydrants must be within 300-feet of the structures. 5. Drawings to adhere to City of Renton drafting standards available at the 6th floor counter. 6. A vertical profile will be required showing the water system. 7. If required fire flow is over 2500 gpm a water loop system is required. A loop system is required to be located in a 15-ft. Utility Easement. The required fire flow will be determine by the Fire Prevention Department. 8. The project is located on the NE 24-23-4 quarter section map. 99cm091W 99CM091 W.DOC1 • • • JCR OFFICE FACILITY 900 BLK OF SW 16th St. Pre-Application October 14, 1999 SEWER(Waste Water): 1. The Sewer System Development Connection charge is $0.078 per oss square feet,but not less than$585. LJe+Ia�4.S Cant �c c�cc�µc �-rd ro s c re� 2. If the project produce fats, oils, or grease,.then an appropriate removal system will be required per plumbing code. 3. Side sewer line to have a 2%slope to property line. 4. Side sewer to have a cleanout five(5')feet out from the building and every 100-feet thereafter. 5. A sewer backflow prevention device is required for the sewer line when the floor elevation is . below 25-ft. ,Sa it fa y c,-t.s j o, •�• s e w c r- 6. Vertical profil,Io be shown on construction plans. 7. Civil Construction drawings to adhere to City of Renton drafting standards. Drawing size is 22 x34. 8. , Show floor elevation on plans.. 9. A 24-inch sewer main is available in SW 16th St. 10. The site is located in the Black River Basin. 11. A conceptual plan for utilities will be required for SEPA Review. 12.• Maintain a 10-ft separation from other utilities. 99cm091S • 99CM091S.DOC\ JCR OFFICE FACILITY 900 BLK OF SW 16th St. Pre-Application October 14, 1999 STORM DRAINAGE: 1. The Storm System Development Connection charge is $0.129 per square foot of new impervious surface area, but not less than$385. • 2. Show topography of entire site and minimum of 30-feet outside the property. 3. Show all CB/MH,storm pipe,detention/retention system, swales and wetlands,ect. 4. Use NAVD 1988 datum for elevations. 5. The proposed project must demonstrate adequacy to meet City code requirements for detention, water quality and conveyance capacity. 6. Drawing scale is 1"=20'.. 7. Provide page index, legend, vicinity map and legal description on the title sheet. Also show . gross site area and new impervious surface area. • 8. A level one Drainage Report will be required,and level 2 and/or level 3 may be required should conditions warrant. The level one report is to address Core. requirements and Special requirements as listed in the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. Specifically note Special requirement#5 and Core requirement#3. 9. Runoff collected from pavement and gravel surface with vehicle access/parking must flow through oil/water separator CB or adequate biofiltration system. 10. The FEMA map shows a portion of the site is in a flood area. The flood area to be shown on your Plans. 11. • Profile of retention pond, storm drains and all utility crossings will be required. 12. The proposed project lies in a flood area. Therefore, compensation for loss of volume in the floodplain must be provided and demonstrated in the Drainage Report calculations. 13. The floor elevation of the structure must be a minimum one foot above the flood plan. 14. Ro$keries within 15-feet of the building is inspected by Building Inspectors and rookeries over , 15-feet from the building is inspected by the Civil Field Inspector. 99cm091D 99CM091 D.DOC1 • JCR OFFICE FACILITY 900 BLK OF SW 16th St. Pre-Application October 14,1999 TRANSPORTATION: 0 1. The traffic mitigation fee is$75 per new trip generated. The ITE trip generation manual will be use as bases for the trip rate. 3. A minimum of a 5-foot planter strip is required between the curb and sidewalk. 4. Back edge of the sidewalk may need to be in a side walk easement if it extend beyond the right- of-way line. 5. Provide a brief traffic report showing the tri• distribution from the site. Ey4,-.4a 4 6-5-0 r%tr u3 oop 99cm091T ur 6 4611 S' rietvli c r ce a uclje) hs a(cic Le,a/t(' • • 99CM091T.DOC\ CITY OF I, ENTON Planning / Building / Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: October 14, 1999 TO: Pre-Application File FROM: Peter Rosen, Senior Planner SUBJECT: JCR Office Facility-Pre-App File No. 99-91. We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the proposed JCR Office Facility. Listed below and attached on several sheets are our preliminary findings. Although every attempt is made to ensure that these comments are complete, a more thorough examination of the project at the time of application submittal may reveal additional issues that may alter these comments or require additional comments. Zoning. The project site was rezoned from Medium Industrial (IM) to Commercial Office (CO) In November 1998. Offices, Including administrative headquarters, professional offices, and medical/dental offices are permitted in the CO zone as primary permitted uses. Development Standards Setbacks: The minimum front street setback required in the CO zone depends on building height. Buildings 25 to 85 feet in height require a minimum front yard/street setback of 20 feet. There are no rear or side yard setbacks required in the CO zone, except where a CO lot is adjacent to residential zone, and this does not apply to the subject site. ke.( fi Building Height: The maximum building height In the CO zone is 250 feet. — /1`Z `''n— Lot Coverage: The maximum lot coverage for buildings is 65% of the total site area. There is no standard for a maximum of impervious surfacing on a site. Landscaping: The CO zone requires a minimum 10 foot wide landscape strip abutting public streets, SW 16th Street in this case. There is also a code requirement for pedestrian connection between the public entrance of the building and the street. no4 r c u ' Comprehensive Plan policies encourage landscaping and berming to screen parking areas from the street. It appears that this cou`Id be accomplished within the landscape strip frontage as shown on the proposed site plan. For development in the Green River Valley, 2% of a total site area must be landscaped as natural, wildlife area. The Code specifies that these landscaped areas should be aggregated on a site, and where possible should be located contiguous to wildlife habitat landscaping on adjacent properties. Native plant landscaping around stormwater facilities is a good alternative ative for meeting this requirement. The parking ordinance requires landscaping equal to 5% of the area of a parking lot over 10,000 square • feet in size. This landscaping should be interior to the parking lot. The calculation of this required landscaping should be provided by the applicant with submittal of the application. Parking: Parking regulations require a minimum of 3 and a maximum of 4.5 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet (sq. ft.) of gross floor area. The pre-application includes 174 stalls for the 48,063 sq. ft. building, equal to a ratio of 3.62 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft! of building. Environmentally Sensitive Areas: The site plan indicates a wetland area In the northwest corner of the site. A wetland study must accompany the application materials. The wetland edges should be delineated and the wetland should be classified according to City wetland regulations. Required wetland buffer widths depend upon the classification of the wetland. The wetland report should evaluate the relation between the wetland and the drainage swale along 1-405. The wetland report should also discuss • JCR Office Facility.DOC impacts to the wetland and wetlan, iffer and provide compensation for imp: • as required under City wetland regulations. Signacie: The sign code allows one freestanding sign ('ncludes monument, pole, roof, projecting, etc.)per street frontage. The maximum sign area is 1 1/2 square feet per each linear foot of street frontage, up to a maximum of 300 square feet,which includes all sign(aces. In addition, the code allows wall signs with copy area not to exceed 20% of the buildina facade. The codeae Ines stree ron age as a pght- o-Way affording direct access." Therefore, the sub ect site has one street frontage along SW 16th Street • and is entitled to only one freestanding sign. L Permit Requirements. The proposal would require SEPA environmental review and Site Plan Review. These reviews are conducted concurrently and take approximately 8 to 10 weeks,which includes the appeal periods. Site Plan Review: Site Plan Review Is required fo all development proposals (which meet SEPA thresholds) in the Commercial Office (CO) zone designation. The proposal would require Administrative Site Plan Review as it does not appear to meet any of the thresholds (i.e. site over 10 acres, adjacent to residential zone, 100,000 square feet in floor area, 300 parking stalls, building height over 4 stories) requiring a public hearing before the Hearing Examiner. Site Plan Review evaluates site layout, building orientation, pedestrian and vehicular circulation, parkin, screening/buffering, and code/policy compliance, .according to specific criteria outlined in the Site Plan Review Ordinance(Section 4-9-200.E.). SEPA Environmental Review - A SEPA environmental checklist must be submitted with the application materials. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) will review the proposal and Issue a threshold ' determination. The most common SEPA mitigation measures include a traffic mitigation fee of $75 per new average daily trip and a Fire mitigation fee equal to$0.52 per square foot of new construction. CC: Jennifer Henning • • JCR Office Facility.DOC . • RECEIVED • SEP 3 01999 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. NEIGHBORHOODS. AND STRATEGIC PLANNING MEMORANDUM DATE: 9/3O f 11 TO: Long Range Planning • FROM: Jana Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: JCR 1[CC C4c L\11 LOCATION: Q Q °F S� U- ST PREAPP NO. 1 - • Please review the attached preliminary project plans for consistency with applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies. Please sutatt yo r wri tten en comments to PE TL ME NI no later than Qat°VW �'. . Thank you. We will not be able to include comments received after this date in the presentation/summary we prepare for the applicant. S►7 L I S ol 3,c.rv/i 1 dD 15-ri'1 r'l_6,6&' awl A- 2-eY3 - -C-`/ )Yu ?Ft� CrJM Pa L=lturYvS\V g, 6 L..11 J, Ih,s0 0iv,3-1° GU l\ c- Po LA c ' I.ss . ( Fart •S-eizitt ►L PZn7Vrv,rv4 s. preapp Environmental Checklist DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON A. BACKGROUND DEC 2 2 1999 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: RECEIVED South 405 Place 2. Name of applicant: John C. Radovich 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 2000 124'Avenue N.E.,Suite B-103 Bellevue,WA 98005• 425-454-6060 Contact person: Rebecca Davidson 4. Date checklist prepared: October 28, 1999 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The applicant would like to begin construction in Spring 2000 with completion in Fall 2000. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Geotechnical Engineering Report by Earth Consultants Traffic Impact Analysis by Christopher Brown &Associates Wetland Evaluation by B &A, Inc. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by you proposal? If yes, explain. None known. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits tat will be needed for your proposal, if known. Agency Permit Type City of Renton Site Plan Approval City of Renton SEPA Determination City of Renton Grading Permit City of Renton Building, Plumbing, and Mechanical Permits City of Renton Sign Permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. The applicant proposes to construct a 70,827 square foot office building on a vacant parcel located at S.W. 16"Street between the vacated streets of Pacific Avenue S.W. and Thomas Avenue S.W. The office building will consist of four stories of approximately 17,000 square feet each. The first floor will be a garage and the remaining three floors will be office space. Constructed of steel and concrete, the building will also feature curved glazing at the southwest and southeast corners. 2 Environmental Checklist The subject property is located directly s uth of 1-405 in the Green River Valley portion of the city and is approximately 2.9 acres in size. The property is generally flat, heavily vegetated and contains a small wetlard in the northwest corner of the site. The surrounding area is composed of a variety of commercial and light industrial uses. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 900 Block of S.W. 16th Street Renton,WA 98550 Section 24,Township 23 North, Range 4 East,W.M., King County,Washington B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) Typical site slopes do not exceed six percent. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. According to the Soil Conservation Service map for this area, the soil is classified as Urban Land, which is soil that has been modified by disturbance of the natural layers with additions of fill material several feet thick to accommodate large industrial and housing installations. In the Green River Valley, the fill ranges from about three feet to more than twelve feet in thickness and from gravelly sandy loam to gravelly loam in texture. The erosion hazard is slight to moderate. Please see attached Geotechnical Engineering Report for more detail. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None known. See attached Geotechnical Engineering Report. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Approximate Fill Quantity: 5,350 cubic yards Source of Fill: To be determined f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Erosion potential is extremely minimal as the site is surrounded by near flat, pervious surfaces. 3 Environmental Checklist g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 75% of the site will be covered by impervious surfaces, including asphalt paving and buildings. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: A temporary erosion control plan will be prepared in accordance with City standards to reduce and control erosion during the construction phase. The measures will include temporary drainage swales, temporary mirafi fencing and a temporary sediment pond. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air vtl+ould result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Normal emissions from construction equipment. Some dust will be generated during construction. Automobile emissions may increase very slightly when the project is complete. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: The site will be watered as necessary to control dust during construction. Construction equipment will be required to meet State emission control standards. 3. WATER j. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. There is an existing wetland of approximately 1,850 square feet in size located within the northwest corner of the property (see attached Wetland Evaluation by B & A, Inc., dated August 1998). This wetland will be preserved in its current condition. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and ttach available plans. Yes. Construction of the hotel with associated parking and a stormwater detention facility will occur with in 200 feet of the existing wetland. Please refer to the submitted plans and the Wetland Evaluation by B &A, Inc.,for more detail. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. No fill or dredge material will be placed in or removed from the existing wetland. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 4 - Environmental Checklist 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-y ar flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. Yes. According to FIRM Ma No. 53033C0978F, revised May 16, 1995, approximately one-half of the sub ect property is within a 100-year floodplain. The floodplain boundary is shown on dhe submitted plans. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or! will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe Storm water runoff from the site will drain into the storm drainage conveyance system designed to handle all runoff. This water will pass through a water quality/detention pond prior to discharge into the wetland at the northwest corner of the property. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: A storm water conveyance detention and water quality treatment system will be designed and constructed in accordance with City of Renton requirements to reduce and control surface-runoff impacts. Also, flood storage compensation will be provided in the northwest corner of the site to mitigate for filling within a portion of the 100-year floodplain. The elevation of the 100-year floodplain for purposes of floodplain compensation was based on a study completed by the City of Renton. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree:fir, cedar, pine, other X shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain 5 Environmental Checklist X wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants:water lily, eel grabs, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation Iwill be removed or altered? Excluding the wetland vegetation, all on-site vegetation will be removed during construction. According to the attached Wetland Evaluation by B & A, Inc., vegetation on the site is a regrowth after the historic disturbance. The forested canopy of the site is made up of red alder, black cottonwood, pacific willow and scattered Oregon ash. The scrub/shrub canopy is dominated by red dogwood, snowberry and spirea. The herbaceous canopy is made up of reed canarygrass and creeping buttercup with scattered sedges, soft rush and lady fern. The vine canopy is dominated by Himalayan blackberry and morning glory. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Ornamental landscaping, including the use of native plants, will be incorporated throughout the developed property. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which rave been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: (see next page) Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? ,f so, explain The Pacific Flyway,which encompasses the majority of the state, is a migratory route for waterfowl. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: The entire development will be landscaped. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric and natural gas for heating and air conditioning purposes. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. 6 Environmental Checklist c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The building will comply with current Washington State Energy Code requirements for glazing and insulation. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Noise from traffic is anticipated from SR-405 adjacent to the north side of the property. However,this noise is not expected to significantly impact the project. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-tern basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short Term: Construction noise will occur during daylight hours for a period of eight to nine months. Long Term: No increase in noise is expected. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any Limit construction activity to daylight hours. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently vacant. The properties to the south, east and west are occupied by commercial/light industrial structures. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Unknown. c. Describe any structures on the site. None. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Commercial/Office (CO) 7 Environmental Checklist - f. What is the current comprehensive p an designation of the site? Employment Area Valley. g. If applicable,what is the current shor line master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. A wetland of approximately 1,850 square feet on size is located within the northwest corner of the propert . This wetland will be preserved in its current condition. See the attached Wetland Evaluation for more detail. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approximately 150-200 people. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposal meets all development standards for a CO (Commercial Office) zone and is consistent with the Employment Area Valley Comprehensive Plan designation. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or cortrol housing impacts, if any: Not applicable. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas;what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed. Structure height—68.7 feet. Exterior materials—Concrete tilt with glass Curtain wall at curved building corners b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. 8 Environmental Checklist c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The architectural styling and exterior materials will be compatible with the commercial architecture in the surrounding area. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Minimal glare from exterior lights during evening hours. b. Could light or glare from the finished roject be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None known. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any Use of shielded light fixtures. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Lower Talbot Hill Park,Talbot Hill Park and Thomas Teasdale Park are all within the immediate vicinity of the site. Fort Dent Park, Foster golf Links and the Christensen Greenbelt are also in the general area. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects li ted on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None known. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The East Valley Freeway to the east and 1-405 to the north are the major highways serving this site. Direct access will be from S.W. 16th Street. 9 Environmental Checklist b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? METRO Transit stops for Line No. 153 are located on each side of S. W. 16t' Street within 100 feet of the subject property. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The completed project will include on-site parking for 197 vehicles. No stalls will be eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? Frontage improvements will be required on S.W. 16t' Street, including a planter strip and sidewalk. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. See the attached Traffic Impact Analysis by Christopher Brown &Associates. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: See the attached Traffic Impact Analysis by Christopher Brown &Associates. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. A minor increase in potential fire protection, emergency services and police protection is anticipated. A fire station is located in the immediate vicinity. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None proposed. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available a the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, cable TV.septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities or the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Storm Sewer: City of Renton Sanitary Sewer: City of Renton Water: City of Renton Power: Puget Sound Energy Telephone: U.S.West Communications Natural Gas: Puget Sound Energy Cable TV: TCI Cablevision of Washington 10 Environmental Checklist C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclo eon part. Proponent: \ , Name Printed: . Date: ret,e 21) 11 . DEVELO MENT T PLANNING UIPr OF RENTON DEC 2 2 1999 RE ''EllVED C August 5, 1998 Ness Holding Company Steve Ness 6645 N. Ensign Street • Portland, OR 97217 RE: WETLAND EVALUATION, PROPERTY NORTH OF SW 16TH STREET, BETWEEN PACIFIC AVENUE SW (VAC) AND THOMAS AVENUE SW (VAC) Dear Steve: The above referenced property has been evaluated for the presence of wetlands in the late winter and spring of 1998. The DOE Washington State Wetland Delineation Manual was used. The site was observed and monitored with one small area in the northwest corner of the property meeting the technical criteria of wetlands. This area should not be regulated under the City of Renton Regulations as it is a lower quality wetland less than 5,000 square feet. Further, the area meeting technical wetland criteria appears to be atop an area of old fill/disturbance and should be exempt from other regulatory jurisdiction on that basis as it may be artificial. METHODOLOGIES Methodology is based on a broad base of experience and understanding of the site, soil mapping and wetland delineation. The determination meets the current definition and criteria of wetlands commonly described as found in the 1987 Federal Manual and as establishded by the latest DOE Delineation Manual. The 1987 and 1989 federal methodologies of(routine, atypical and disturbed situations were sourced to achieve the delineation. In addition, the USDA Soil Survey P. O. Box 1337, Gig Harbor WA 98335 USA 253.858.7055 FAX 253.858.2534 3005R/ajb/08/05/98 -- - - V. b 3 • • • Manual, the "USDA SCS Soil Survey of the area was used as well as the latest NHSTC Hydric Indicators. Those areas exhibiting anaerobic and saturated conditions in the upper part for two weeks of the growing season are considered wetlands. Small isolated areas with ponding as a result of wheel compaction from farm equipment did not qualify as a wetland when the immediate surrounding area did not meet wetland criteria. • SOIL WATER MONITORING TECHNIQUES To understand seasonal soil water relations appropriate data collection and monitoring procedures are required. Background data collection consists of soil morphology including redoximorphic features, depositional environment, and landforms for accurate soil water assessment. • A proven techniques for determining the ocation of soil water levels involves careful planning. Measuring soil temperature at 19.6 inches establishes the period at which 41°F or 5°C is exceeded.' This is the ter.,perature threshold for microbial activity to begin. The various microbes are essential to the process of Iron and manganese reduction chemistry In other words formation of redoximorphic features. Many western Washington soils exhibit high soil water levels during the non-growing winter season. The field is monitored in the winter for advent of the growing season. Soil temperatures will Iiklely rise and stayed above 41° F at 19.6 Inches on or about March 1, thus beginning the growing season and routine water table monitoring. The water table monitoring will establish and verify a wetland determination • based on monitored soil water conditions. Soil temperature and soil water level measurements are accurately obtained in randomly located soil auger bore holes. Soil morphology including redoximorphic features is recorded at each permanent station along with the soil water levels and soil temperatures. The various strata (layers) of the depositional environment affects soil water movement and is recognized. Landform(s) and soil landscape age provide significant data associated with accurate soil water assessment. Measuring bore holes is repeated In the near vicinity each time but utilizing a fresh bore hole. When soil water is present the equilibration period must take into account surface water or rainwater as they may produce erroneous data. Piezometers are not be used in these soil conditions due to the risk of installation failure is high. • 3005R/ajb/08/05/98 Finally, soil water assessment techniques on this site are complicated and required a high degree of expertise and experience in order to insure valid monitoring and interpretation. The monitoring by Registered Professional and Certified Professional Soil Scientists trained in soil physic, hydrology monitoring, soil morphology, agricultural drainage, agronomy, soil mapping, and geomorphology ensure accuracy of the results. Proper interpretation of the data and results is likely to only be done by those with similar backgrounds. Soil Investigation Five plots for the evaluation of wetlands were established on January 7, 1998. The five plots were representatively located across the site with Plot#5 in the lowest position in the landscape, which is the center of the area delineated. Soil logs were taken at each of the locations. The soil investigation found the a typical profile on the property had approximately 4 inches of a dark brown silt loam over a brown silt loam to 8 or 13 inches. Below this, the soils appeared to be either dark grayish brown or grayish brown very fine sandy loam to silt loam to about 25 inches. The site had evidence of some disturbance, but the horizonation tended to be natural. The exception is test hole #5, it had evidence of disturbance. Vegetation Vegetation of the site Is a regrowth after the'historic disturbance. The forested canopy of the site is made up of red alder, black cottonwood, pacific willow and scattered Oregon ash. The scrub/shrub.canopy is dominated by red dogwood, snowberry, and spirea. The herbaceous canopy is made up of reed canarygrass, and creeping buttercup with scattered sedges, soft rush and lady fern. The vine canopy is dominated by Himalayan blackberry and morning glory. Hydrology • The five test plots were monitored for hydrology. The monitoring locations were observed on approximately 10-day intervals from late February until late April. In no instance was a water table or saturation In the upper part noticed in any of the • holes. The area delineated as a wetland did have ponding for approximately the first 2.5 weeks of March; however, there was no water table nor saturated soils before or after this period. The wetland delineation is based solely on the surface water in the excavated and filled area in the northwest corner of the property. • 3005wa1bJO8IO5I98 Regulated Wetlands Lower quality wetlands less than 5,000 square feet are exempt from regulations. These are low quality wetlands as stated under Section 4-32-3D3.a.(1) These wetlands are characterized by hydrologic isolation with the only hydrologic connection being the drainage ditch along Interstate 405. (2) The soils have been altered as the area delineated has be excavated and backfilled. B. (1) The area delineated as a wetland is an excavated area that has been refilled, therefore there is a wetland occurring on top of fill, possibly and (2) the wetland is characterized by emergent vegetation consisting of willows and red dogwoods overhanging from the margins Into the delineated area with practically no vegetation growing in the delineated area. If the wetland does not qualify as a low quality wetland through its connection along the ditch of 1-405, it would only be a Category ll wetland and It is less than 2,200 square feet, being approximately 1,800 square feet. • Proposed Activities and Impacts At the time of the preparation of this report, a site plan ha not been formalized. It is understood that the intent will be to grade and clear the site with the eventual • construction of a building and associated parking areas. Whereas, the wetland is not regulated by the City of Renton, there are no applicable buffers or needs for additional mitigation. If the city's requirements have changed such that some mitigation is required, this will be done thlrough mitigation banking or similar activity if necessary. We will wait on the city's response with regard to additional agency involvement. Si• • • A. . :redber• 3005R/ajb/08/05/98 • TABLE 1 • MONITORING RESULTS Depth to water table In Inches Date 1 2 3 4 5 1R 44" 43' 40' None to 44" 28" • 2/19 No water to 24" 43" 40". None to 44" 28" 3;/3 No water to 24" 43" 40" None to 44° Flooded 3/13 No water to 24" 43" 40" None to 44" Flooded 3/28 No water to 24" 43" 40" None to 44" No water to 24' 4/9 No water to 24" r 43' 40" None to 44" No water to 24" 4/23 No water to 24" 43" 40" None to 44" No water to 24' • • • • 3005R/aJb/08/05198 WIMININIMMIONImindlillp mow.... I - 41 INIP'4111 .... ..--+..--11111 I 4 :13-4 a-----I----ITE Nsh S . <0 ce + 1101-44 141 VICINITY MAP FIGURE 1: VICINITY MAP NESS HOLDING COMPANY SW 16TH STREET B&A, INC. #3005 MV1.f_�n� ca+ ate . ... .--. -__ --- -- - - - ' - - • J a— I I I 5 1 • 1 I I I I 1 I 1 1 , I I ..... Y� j 1 • s �' I I... • I — I 20 40 r• • r 34 1 1 • 17.. U - — — • — — • — — • — — • — I L• IP • 11.3 • 17.4 I 33 -rXa 1 1 R • 1..s • II.i • • 14.0 I tN ; I• i.s M 1 32 I 3--• �' uJ • SCALE: 1" = 401 .: > I — - • - - • - - • -- - • _ _ . _ __I < I • 1... I a 31 V I 1..1 / 1;17.7 Z O Q • 1 0 >. . co • IR. I 0 I z w 1..7 1 0111 • 17.4 17.4�' 1.� 1.3 Q I D (5N I I 0 I I O `" I I I I . 17. • Is. • 1 0 S y N d I7. I I I I 0 • • I 17.1 I. cV Z uj ? 17.2 • 1ail LLI I I I I 1 20 40 • 1.t n CO I I 1 I • • 17.. I S I U- '5 I 26 I 27 I 28 129 1 • I S • 451 1 I ,61 I le • 7.e 389.69• I 1 1 �__I aa..-- •— -- — • -- — . _ . - -AI — y21.71—7,4 —s1.r— �t.s_- — I.• 21.0 .1=8 1.2 I 7121.0 :0NC. PAD ~'v 1 ' n 7YP i f.........•••%..s.................j o 3� .r EXISi1NC �� EIOS11N0 M 20.6 E SSW RIME BASIN RIMEL21.2 RIM EL20.4 ■� . imperimmle. - .- coo outs cuaq P. 09 . f f 6 ? fl I --1 _ r r • 1O 9 $ I -- I 11 II r ....... I i .1-... .— r geR°x • I 60 WC?00 I j �` \,���.. /' I/, I I 1 �• FENCE II II 1a5 �il9 i �A _ --� U I • I I ► .. i 4qi'112 1 ..... 0 _.. 1a3T I Q • 1 t 1 1 I �„a¢,3: ,,ea; I I I II" 4,�� . �.1r: 1 I I f AkIs7 /2 r�' I I (7% 16I 14 • 1ar • - - I _9 I 41z7 :.71 I S I I % 115.5 • la5 I I LLJ yr I N •c/ r 01 I 1a1 • 11.31 I cCD n N OI m I r I Q I I I 1 I" • 1..1 I 1 1 15.: 16 . 1 • 15.0 •11.4:3 CH. LINK (ta: i 7• 1a. i I I I I I I I I 1.3I ) c l/ 1 1 I I I I I x I �; I I I � 1 I I I . I . . I 1a41 I ;1..1 111.0 • 1 • 14.0 I • 14.0. I I • u. • Iaj 1 I I I I I I I • 1a1 ($ 13.7 I 60 1 7 I �1 I TOE 9 1 26 1 21 1 22 I 23 I. 24 I I / 1' L LI.' __ I _.� 1 +'I L 410.01 • 4.:.. ®1.42j "21-r' n: �; T �r � rTdPj rx- I ,,,rr .....—.....21.7..--h,— ' + 1 47 6SS SMH IQ js 1 1i, Fi RIM EL 21.4 ' a s'nNor21.7 S. W. 16 f h ST 1.E. - s.� • caicsl sin N89'26'S9"E J• Y V Riu 4 xo.� .- • a CI MINIMIIIININ U• S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE • SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE 122°15' R.4 E. R.5 E. ittArr1.11(CITY P.0.110/441. r'30'4 a*41. sc 47°30' 4 •••14 ErIlINCI P.- .i,';''‘., • IE' Semis alf- %AMORE in Ran ti AV \,,, \ \ 1(riall B °* * .- -w--- .'74 B 'I ma•• .A1 se INEA MI 51 i' 4 'I' I'-' ''• MIMI r 4 • • •...% . .. „„. ,ut;ma.•g. • IINCISI •- .- : ‘ . .. , ••• rzahmers ,. i III7..-m \ • '' • -•.. v..,. • ..-1.S.. ktitifi• :„ • \•.% tin • 'D 1 ;4 IL.. . ., its ,, , riA ion ;,..rw--,-4, • • ':• , SY: i I. 1 . IA • .,:.,,....; _ • . • 1 . .1 ) ...,-`:-:---,r,- 'P 1 Mk.. Riyer •.,1 .-. t.. ,__11,d,, pi . 4 . •I .. 1 R li . 11)1 RON 14.••I ." • 0 . 14 mili, . ;I.,• yi iii,_:____., , \ • ....aii„ 1.. i In,, _ '447-ir •1444214iikkil littp. Ittr.p tik\l• ii \ ,1.,: -Iiilibiti 1 ..... • romml i b ta.)-% • e • \‘` •I 165500111MP Atit F6*''‘..)-----..7 1-1 •Y.' t4oft' rd 7410 ti --4•1 • _•,, •• • , , 1• ':•.• \IR, 0,....21t. 4 . .-,,.- Alillgattit Op ...•• ... 4 " 1..- ---,-- '-- -- :,-.' il • •• NI -• _ 4 ,6`‘. &fl „ 4 ., •:• • , ..,;.-•,-.:,•••.4 ,,,rya -.{...• . ----- PP-- 4-. -.. . - *sap -,...„...-. . , • • 1, •••'" 'A p xx-',m.,°'"° 4 3.."''' .-4‘..„.• MM. c \'..‘kr\. 4 .. • . • ft...-„rw...,." • - La---- - ..• .•., , ht ' '. .1 @ • ..... . -- . . ' ,,,4,...,,.... _‘,. ' -•!-,: ... 71 III vi.,.. . 11 l Pk. •. - • • %.. • • '•-•:--- 06.... ;. s ir.fLk. : Alliiim-t-tpeAljijAhisliail , -1-8•••... .: II ,,, ti.: ..._._.-..•-•--ca.-1 J 1 , 13.9 4 • :A •_..:11'*NIA .a.** • . 1.•2 in vii4 il.1 EL IP r(1 1. 11 . .. : '•; V,''1• •4•.;Ft rt.la. ..iii,••e„''41f.-4E%./15017 , (tr ;, - -4.. •- ,,--iiiii !,1 9 li.c., I Es!.. ,i It . •;1;4.s.t..- • e!).;' '\,.4144• I. t. . • .. II.. • . • : •i• '7 •-•:;,...• ,..•V:AY,t'ilt l'`‘,. .16.. ,' .at •- i / , • c., •, '. ...••-*.-1krais."Esi h:l. 'm Ni; .., 1 , .1%.,,I,,,ki.,.'•4i3 4 .•,'•C' - ''.7i4?, .4?-A 4:#4. .+,s . f tA-,-jr.--1 MS .IVA ini.' rt.. .tr*. '..z ., • . . 4.7.4 •)..oil ..ec;,4 .; : •!"..pt.z.•:::ii,t, .•.t ..4.,..._ if ,.... . L.,f -, .siti- •••• ...A.1/11'-'•a• ''.1111'.•Pit, t 1. •-•,-------- • •-..//CP.7,10.4• \ -Nq Air iffl,stz,.. ,.,,,,,•,,•. . ......04 ......,,,,,,. ..,14. It.. .. 1\ , . 1"...-,.1461:Pr-Htiti 1 nrv"... ui ...‹....a. . ."-• •••••••• - S. k I litLbliNlil . '''. • • {-7';'t.•,:r.f...:•;•'••tc...;`,.._ ;••-;:- ,AL'I,r. 17 f•-:''1.`ti. . kilr'. i elk:till/11OP •%, • ...4," ••-, diiiiii." . i.:... . •..!•,., ..:0-01.c-A."1"...„_,..0.-.491.4,,..-1,..,,, • ' ' -r• ' ,•,, t-f' „E„.. li..4,../;f .1.7.:01,1. vvv.o...- . • v !.0 tiiii F r-v -.•46,-,..rizei• .,....: •. . Ibtft:%.;,,,ii, .).• _'..L. ti.10,02611k Va. . / • ,t, -- 4:•-•---: . . -• .-- I..,lr PV.).0., . l' . ' I • . D.•r/ r•I • Pr%IA IC.51111V, . i . ei.peC %Dap.. mr.r ,... , r I . • • I .11213.6."-- • .41'. .... . I;• .c r , em 11?. . . ..i. If.i....,•I' I •A "-_,,,,,d,.... • I • i . -.A ir f. 1 .. . 1,,,„,„,„0....40,4:r liar! it • 1. , ., „ .. . ,.w...- 4*,,-„..t...„30 %.f.,,,,.,, ,,,,A 3. ikil,v I. A . i.„1„,70,..„,... .00,...._ .-.Acia • Iiii.....:....tait a..-___.„... • .0, v. 1 . 14 • :•16 ,- ,.• 00 91•-• Ai ;or ,.1.:§'.,00,_,,,,ro.; . -,4,.tit.L.0.1.-- - _.-:---ol --r_ LI :., ,...„,,,•_, .i 11), . 1!:r.' _..--+•-• : Grier . ''''''' 4' % / Ng , "7"iierie.".r. • ci, :DI: - 7'flr,;:rs----irlbvgr Entin l'4-`. tr-it.-. •--',- ...r; , .-s.:. . .i t:5.1; •0:--.,x)01- -r I A !', 4,4, r%,•,; its -47;,4Lfeff. i -pi:All , itta- ... . , •:6 4,- - - , • 4"-----1. • *- \ -,"!..efYr. ...4,st..t- , i, " ct.l.f. _,. -. •Jr), .10) 1( •!iii 1 ''' -, A li . UV . ;.,1;.. .I tikil; I. " it, •' 1 X 4:ii -.4( •''%'. , i I Lowers ! • • . . . •.i .. . it .1 ari. • 6 - 4*. v II ' 1 ILI • ,....-C'' • -,-7.--'1:' :A ,. 1 . • , , ,. -.. , •• i LN •• f- 11 ..is'.. r; . . •••'1! •ti;lr'i leN : • . .-. , • ..-, .01 6.•.:1. cl ...kAigr ll •••0;1 1.16 %til, -- .,.._. .:•47 I. 3M MO 11111. I. .r To lila .1.3 `4! .-..:1 ''.• 7.• '..;r3v. .11-Alt.A ., C)*- P '4.•::1'.., ;-I' II Ur- :: l'••• • ...e,-0;,:-• .-mi .,,,l-m - T.; !loll t. 1 mai -1/4 v• ••:,i• k 41 ' • Ift is I IL .t Track' ,.. I • it. ;ii?...%•.., Almill ''1.4 . , "• _ :".*:' •••3.. • '4.0..i, • f 1 ..,, .4 , F's . . .1.--..L..•• '••••-it-i'.:- ••tr_y\---1.-,s ----.7-- ...1•1 - .41,/': 0.LiFITO .f‘ um . . . -, . 1 - 1 ' .'ezz:.er,: . .:-.-., . .g.• ... .k i:A:i 1,11 % . 9 • , .1 ' - •.. 4, 27,30„- k..1/...4 •I3,3 0 . b I ,1)1 I. N ig . . ...--.---.. 1%.._ ;lit 1*. R • .,•). V. rr.v. - ts , or.f - • . k • 1 'It- , • - • ' ..i.‘. l';t4 •••:.i • i 1 z.e..• R....• 4 1 • . ,f.i.-..•' iiikl 's.,,•••Ci: . •1 ..„ 1..,•• tr ...... . •.: .0• 4134, '';'}- 7,1 ,‘•• - • .--- , • ,,..,,,•••••‘. - ..,• • f'",•••- .4..v.4 .: os gl'. s. ,f• Irriii. V ...0:.„, laillni ;„b ,..):,.....,4.i.•,... i:'' 13:' ) ttl, .qfpil. - • . .- wo . . .... . , % ..1;,. „ ro. p.:••:,. . •• 1 4i. - ?•••'• iPc4:...- 1:..d- • , • A f..if 21 icx•i•V •••:t1 , ... •)•",1 ".2 .-11-:'••• 'Al' . ' .‘,' pm IRE 3: KING COUNTY SOIL SURVEY • s . ::,: .' ''„'i ."..:. .". 'e'4*. 'f 7:vi. rt:ti.lt.S.: .t'L•. 1 .;•:giz.-.:;.4.0.i..r.r.3.:y.it i _i,,c. . 1..1..,.•': NESS HOLDING COMPANY • -• , .,,,,,.• ;.,•'.'••:;:. et'74-Ve:S , , • )' ' 1... l.f.t :-'::4,40:.`iVi ..t:g..0i:rk ." '• ' ‘\l'i• I;.• . . _mikl -1 5711 cammT .. •,• ..,...A..„.,..,,,.., .N...,,,,c,. • :fel,. 2:. ..:' *e '. get r.1- 5- -#3(X15 i' ,,,,:.• r . e.:(• . ti..,0,1 • ...•... ........4'.....t,;,-.. .41.sirk..,..4:11,4.! Li$ ..4-...• I;F.F.l."-17'''.t .740, p.......-. ...... .. 11 -4 VP:c"...`.....3i3933:111-all-17 -4 L.A. s' --.-.... . • • DATA FORM 1 4 Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) -Project/Site: e'w / (Ft ( pav 1-dAI Date: / /7 (9a Applicant/owner: de i5 14 I de- ,./ C o County: ;erg C• • � � . State: w� Investigator(s): Q a 4 A Q STF/R: . ti/ Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? q no Community ID: Is the site significantly disturbed(atypical situation)? (g"e� no Transect ID: �R i Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes 1 ( Plot ID: • VEGETATION . Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator R.e-A- Aid .er 5. 4,p 64.G et.. !-'a cme d _ see �d.Gw �.d. w Aere sit Plc.& J Reel 5 C ,,iaiyJ i raS 1-1� -F4-c.41 HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: %of dominants OBL,FACW,&FAC: ?S • Check all indicators that apply&explain below: . Regional knowledge of plant communities Wetland plant list(nat'l or regional) ✓ ' OTHER Physiological or reproductive adaptations Morphological adaptations Technical Literature Wetland Plant Data Base Hydrophytic vegetation present? Go no Rationale for decision/Remarks: IIYDROLOG'Y Is it the growing season? yes 8 Water Marks: yes no Sediment Deposits: yes no Based*on: ci cede- $ I e"lu Drift Lines: yes no Drainage Patterns: yes no Dept. of inundation: inches Oxidized Root(live roots) Local Soil Survey; yes no Channels<12 inyes no . Depth to free water in pit: _inches FAC Neutral: yes no Water-stained Leaves: yes no Depth to saturated soil: 4).2-Y rr inches Check all that apply &explain below: Other. Stream,Lake or gage data: Aerial photographs: rt Other: Wetland hydrology present? yes Rationale for decision/Remarks: N,ss SOUS, Map Unit Name 5ek 1/4,A/ Drainage Class /',' (Series& Phase) .1 Field observations confirmazD No ••...) Taxonomy(subgroup) mapped type? Profile Description . Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture,concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size&contrast structure,etc. profile moist) moist) (match description) D y A a YQ 3�� 5`f'. Li_LI 46 tu re ei 6 ......- 1 Pt,,4 9).6-YR' (3 C I d - 6 ,.,.455o s 516 . ' °t -24 3� �` hz i d 51. � Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol Concretions -, Histic Epipedon I High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils • Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors I Other(explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? yes es Rationale for decision/Remarks: 4 j i law c_ /ro ,-, a, Wetland Determination(circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? e) no Hydric soils present? yes 4 Is the sampling point yes ) • Wetland hydrology present? yes cat within a wetland? • Rationale/Remarks: • • NOTES: • DATA FORM 1 Routine Wedan Determination 4 (WA State Wetland D ineadon Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual Project/Site: Sw /6 fit 4)9,v 1 o-V Date: ( /7 if a Applicant/owner: Ale 0 I d c ,✓i C 0 , County: -,ir� • State: 4✓y Investigator(s): Q ! t $ A S B Srr/R: 2.9123 Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? 4 s no Community : Is the site significantly disturbed(atypical situation)? es no Transect ID: 1 .Z Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes Plot ID: VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum _ Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator _ Re '1 vi II Q r $4 g4,c Co &A, wed d 64c w' B` c Is.Pit 3 Uw r cyp 1 b ��iC/ HYDROPHYTIC VEdETATION INDICATORS: %of dominants OBL,FACW, &FAC: 6 d Check all indicators that apply&explain below: Regional knowledge of plant communities Wetland plant list(nat'l or regional) y OTHER Physiological or reproductive adaptations Morphological adaptations Technical Literature Wetland Plant Data Base Hydrophytic vegetation present? a no Rationale for decision/Remarks: • HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? a yes (5Water Marks: ies no Sediment Deposits: yes no Based*on: s•' Drift Lines: yes no Drainage Patterns: yes no Dept.of inundation: inches Oxidized Root(live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes no Channels<12 in.yes no Depth to free water in pit: inches FAC Neutral: yes no Water-stained J Leaves: yes no Depth to saturated soil: rZ ( inches Check all that apply&explain below: Other. Stream,Lake or gage data: Aerial hoto hs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? yes Rationale for decision/Remarks: . /U2S$ • SOILS . / / i. Map Unit Name c //4 / ' i 4 "'''- Drainage Class �• 0 ` �l . (Series&Phase) Field observations confirm No Taxonomy(subgroup) _ mapped type? Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture,concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size 8i contrast structure,etc. profile moist) moist) (match description) 0' y A w.re 3�3 b._.._, s, 1. 4- 8 hi; /°YRY/3 • ,t Z-22 6 ?• s pk, 1..s'fr'Rst At , t 't 22-E, 85 56G q/z i, al 1d UPSG . • )—Y5I- c. 5-66 di4 4 A !d ! t Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) ' Hlstosol Concretions Histic Epipedon 1 High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor 1 Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils . • Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions 1 Listed on National Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors 1 Otherlexplaln in remarks) Hydric soils present? no Rationale for decision/Remarks: ei/ • A d ers, 4i/ IA Wetland Determin:Ltion(circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? no - _ Hydric soils present? no Is the sampling point • yes no . . Wetland hydrology present? Yes i3 'within a wetland? • Rationale/Remarks: . NOTES: • • ff. 05 DATAF RM1 Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual). Project/Site: ,S'w /6 tit /0 0.4) Date: //9 f Applicant/owner: Ale 5 40 d i i✓q Co I County: 1;erg - J State: wy Investigator(s): Q @. 1 If A S e S/T/R: 2-eip 3 4i/te/� Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? U) no Community Is the site significantly disturbed(atypical situation)? no Transect ID: 7/ Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes CID Plot ID: VEGETATIM Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant dies Stratum Indicator COPc 4Itier McJ 13. at.- 4. 64.n // rif 41# #OA' W on CI 4, i _ ee d Ce#400 r+►t 't re?-e a ,vow �rr S hicw HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: %of dominants OBL,FACW,&FAC: C� Check all indicators that apply&explain below: Regional knowledge of plant communities Wetland plant list(nat'l or regional) '" OTHER Physiological or reproductive adaptations Morphological adaptations Technical Literature Wetland Plant Data Base Hydrophytic vegetation present? /'ye'� no Rationale for decision/Remarks: HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? yes Water Marks: yes no Sediment Deposits: yes no Based*on: , Drift Lines: yes no Drainage Patterns: yes no Dept.of inundation: inches Oxidized Root(live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes no Channels<12 in.yes no Depth to free water in pit: inches FAC Neutral: yes no Water-stained Leaves: yes no Depth to saturated soil: 9'04-1/ inches Check all that apply&explain below: Other. Stream,Lake or gage data: Aerial photographs: Other: • Wetland hydrology present? yes Rationale for decision/Remarks: . •, Map Unit Name Sa /14 Drainage Class /gym tit Pei( (Series&Phase) Field observations confirm 110 No Taxonomy (subgroup) __ mapped type? Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture,concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size&contrast structure,etc. profile moist) _ moist) (match description) • o--s A bre 313 S, k q AI, 414Yls , 9-l) Q tot f1 �•SYR�-xi C-/ J 1, 13-,zy a. s Ps]2 I I Mid v-CS e_ .2 k-1-4(5 YAA .( /11'" 4s1, Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol Concretions • Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor I Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List • Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma Curs Other(explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? yes no . Rationale for decision/Remarks: 64- "4 S T�✓c�: cor • Wetland Determinatioq(circle) Hydrophydc vegetation present? r no Hydric soils present? yes Is the sampling point yes —firs Wetland hydrology present? yes n within a wetland? • Radonale/Remarks: • • NOTES: • DATA FORM 1 Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) Project/Site: t5'4., /6 eV r0,Q.c.,/o� Date: /9 j9 a Applicant/owner: Ne f S l f 0 I d i ,1 C o . County: 1 t;vg • B State: t✓y / Investigator(s): Q e, µ $ SLUR: 2/ .2 -�// Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? (y sd no Community ID: rr Is the site significantly disturbed(atypical situation)? no Transect ID: 7 if Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes O. Plot ID: • VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Co gA/ 1006 d S fps,d Aide r- MG C.6d4 Per. ite• // HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: • %of dominants OBL,FACW,&FAC: /D O r Check all indicators that apply&explain below: Regional knowledge of plant communities Wetland plant list(nat.'or regional) OTHER Physiological or reproductive adaptations Morphological adaptations Technical Literature Wetland Plant Data Base Hydrophytic vegetation present? y s no ' Rationale for decision/Remarks: (/ HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season?AA yes no I Water Marks: yes no Sediment Deposits: yes no G Based on: UK� Drift Lines: yes no Drainage Patterns: yes no Dept.of inundation: inches Oxidized Root(live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes no Channels<12 in lees no Depth to free water in pit: inches FAC Neutral: yes no Water-stained 6Leaves: yes no Depth to saturated soil: 4>2 Y inches Check all that apply&explain below: Other. Stream,Lake or gage data: Aerial photographs: __ ., Other: Wetland hydrology present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks: SOPS • Map Unit Name ige,41 4tu1 - Drainage Class poi) t (Series di:Phase) J j Field observations confirm No Taxonomy(subgroup) mapped type? Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture,concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) ' (Munsell (Munscll size&contrast structure,etc. profile moist) moist) (match descjigtioo) 6 .25- 2,5131, 1. SyR el 5, .4 25-'o Y / M f5L Hydrie Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) • Histosol Concretions Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor rganic Streaking in Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime Y Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions ,Listed on National Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other(explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? es no Rationale for decisioWRemar : • Wetland Determinatioq(circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? s no Hydric soils present? no Is the sampling point yes • Wetland hydrology present? yes �io within a wetland? • Rationale/Remarks: • �/ • • NOTES: DATA FORM I Routine Wetland Detetinination (WA State Wetland D !nation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) Project/Site: ,5 w /6, Eft /Q��./ , Date: / /2 /9 9 Applicant/owner: de is 4/0 r d i ,J C G , County: Ki Aed • State: 4,4 Investigator(s): 1264 IT A S B SIF/R: '2 3 ti/ e exist on the site? s no Community Do Normal Circumstances � �i� Is the site significantly disturbed(atypical situation)? (7 no Transect ID: [`l Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes (03 Plot ID: VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum _ Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Mc- La' rLtA, ' ' ,vjc HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: %of dominants OBL,FACW, &FAC: Check all indicators that apply&explain below: Regional knowledge of plant communities Wetland plant list(nat'1 or regional) ✓ OTHER Physiological or reproductive adaptations Morphological adaptations Technical Literature Wetland Plant Data Base Hydrophytic vegetation present? . no Rationale for decision/Remarks: HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? yes ) Water Marks: yes no Sediment Deposits: yes no Based.on: Life. Drift Lines: yes no Drainage Patterns: yes no Dept. of inundation: inches Oxidized Root(live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes no Channels<12 in.yes no Depth to free water in pit: inches FAC Neutral: yes no Water-stained Leaves: yes no Depth to saturated soil: 7 2c( inches Check all that apply &explain below: Other. Stream,Lake or gage data: Aerial photographs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks: 4455 SOILS Map Unit Name Sct./ 4� �1�/1'a ,�i►'� Drainage Class AP Q-the // , � . (Series&Phase) �J Field observations confirm II No Taxonomy(subgroup mapped type? Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture,concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size&contrast sttuctore,etc. profile moist) moist) (match description) & vl A- ro tk3/3 51• 4 •'24- p x'5Y41 it -7esA Al( d 514 5- K G sYsit ?. s ?R / 3 PsL • Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) • Histosol Concretions Histic Epipedon ,High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime [ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors - Other(explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? �//� ��5 f' Rationale for decision/Remarks: ( LJ /V r'q • Wetland peterminatloq(circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? no Hydric soils present? no Is the sampling point Ye .D‘ . Wetland hydrology present? yes 0 within a wetland? • Rationale/Remarks: 1,44-465 SCI, • • • NOTES: • _. ___ --- _.+.+-. n . - -- SOIL , Map Unit Name Drainage Class (Series&Phase) Field observations confirm Yes No Taxonomy(subgroup) _ mapped type? Profile Description , Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture.concretions. Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size&contrast structure,etc. profile moist) moist) _ (match description) 3-(f 4-i iorg g 5,•L o 'r' if3 /ur`fpc// deo�i,' - —,?OF A . /,6- a 7.5- F s ffe 5 i L . Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) ' Histosol Concretions Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor I Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime I Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions I Listed on National Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors I ,Other(explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? '� ..... /Iv— . Rationale for decision/Remarks � ¢' ����` �� 64. fors .- . po,ad� dr:c_ (J Wetland Determjlnatioq(circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? no Hydric soils present? no Is the sampling point dab no . Wetland hydrology present? no within a wetland?- Rationale/Remarks: • • • NOTES: • ,.• .. • gltrift,17,l•alwar,iiAliNr010atliA07;.RW.P.E.PA Ika,!p;•v cn°y;g.4:f."h nf x!nA � r,8ag,y y.y�. �^.! f�.A�;;r h':��}�n,� �`fr07 :'v NO 1.: , h 1/41111* 'i N> COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE DEVELOPMENT PLANNING if CITY OF RENTON DEG 22 1999 4. h, 1.EC IV CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY FA af CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Missouri corporation, herein called the Company, for a valuable rzconsideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner Or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the A land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges therefore; all subject to they. provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Exclusions from Coverage (appearing herein) and to the Conditions and r; Stipulations hereof. ,0. This Commitment shall be effective onlywhen the identit of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policyor ► Y P P policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the time of the issuance, 'f• i; of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement. • is This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and A+• obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six months after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. • „ r h: In Witness Whereof,CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE CO PANY has caused this commitment to be signed and sealed pia as of the date of policy shown in Schedule A, the poll y to become valid when countersigned by an authorized :. signatory. tV hh t,; It ti i iO4 h. k Issued by: r' CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY I. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY *` h 1800 Columbia Center By: 701 Fifth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 � "$`.'.' � 419 ,;, iit (206) 628- 5666 of k ;`c, Zi-._ (3�t� * Q " • . ,. . T. President I S »Arity By: `.'1'"i'ir-1/44 1:44'‘AAA))/ Catir11410" 4, 4 Secretary :, 0 !r D ; R .;.v4. ;; ..:...F. .a:.�r �..r. Y :..: .k-0, Ytl t'.,:'', :� 1 �-.� tt.t::.;:�.+, t. 1' ... xY'1::':...1,t+i::::t t'r ;.ca'4 r .rsr i... +Y+''..�,. .•,�,'. �:;m•�,' �:y�•4 '•h::,::.'+'aJ' ,;•4y t' 2:F' 'k:; ,.;r. CO'.:...TIONS AND TIPULATIONS 1. The term "mortgage," when used herein, shall include d ed of trust, trust deed or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereo covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof,and shall fail to disclose such knowledg to the Company in writing,the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act �f reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien,encumbrance,adverse claim or other matter,the Company at its option may amend Schedule B off this Commitment accordingly,but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of polio or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith(a)to comply with the requirements hereof,or(b)to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B,or(c)to acquire or create the estate oil interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions, the Conditions and Stipulations, and Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured where are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the prJovisions of this Commitment. EXCLUSIONS NOTE: THE FORM OF POLICY COMMITTED FOR MAY BE EXAMINED BY REFERENCE TO FORMS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE INSURANCE COMMISSIONER OR BY INQUIRY AT THE OFFICE WHICH ISSUED THIS COMMITMENT. The Exclusions from Coverage referred to in Paragraph 3 of the Conditions and Stipulations are as follows: ALTA OWNER'S POLICY FORM 10-17-92 The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law,ordinance or governmental regulation(includ'ng but not limited to building and zoning laws,ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii)the character,dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land;(iii)a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; of(iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regula- tions, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by(a)above,except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insu ed claimant; (b) not known to the Company,not recorded in the public ecords at Date of Policy,but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insered claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; dr (e) resulting in loss or damage.which would not have been sustained if the inured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest insured this policy. t� • "—AGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPA • it COLUMBIA CENTER, 701 5TH AVE Title Unit: U-06 SEATTLE, wA 98'104 SECOND COMMITMENT Phone: (206)628-5610 A.L.TA.COMMITMENT Fax: (206)628-9717 SCHEDULE A Order No.: 510937 Officer: DARYL/ROGER/BARB/PAUL/DAVID Your No.: NESS/RADOVICH PROPERTIES Commitment Effective Date: AUGUST 10, 1999 at 8 :0 0 A.M. 1. Policy or Policies to be issued: ALTA Owner's Policy Amount: $550,000.00 1992 EXTENDED Premium: $1,950.00 OWNERS EXTENDED RATE Tax: $ 167.70 Proposed Insured: • RADOVICH PROPERTIES L.L.C. , A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY • Policy or Policies to be issued: Amount: $0.0 0 ALTA Loan Policy Premium: • Tax: Proposed Insured: Policy or Policies to be issued: Amount: $0.0 0 ALTA Loan Policy Premium: Tax: Proposed Insured: 2. The estate or interest in the land which is covered by this Commitment is: • • FEE SIMPLE 3. Title to the estate or interest in the land is at the effective date hereof vested in: STUART C. NESS, STEVEN A. NESS AND SUSAN K. MCLEOD, AS THEIR RESPECTIVE SEPARATE ESTATES, AS THEIR INTERESTS MAY APPEAR, AS TO PARCEL A; AND SUSAN K. MCLEOD, ALSO APPEARING OF RECORD AS SUSAN N. MCLEOD, PRESUMPTIVELY SUBJECT TO THE COMMUNITY INTEREST OF A SPOUSE, IF MARRIED JANUARY 17, 1991; STUART C. NESS, AS HIS SEPARATE ESTATE; AND STEVEN A. NESS, AS HIS SEPARATE ESTATE; AS THEIR INTERESTS MAY APPEAR, AS TO PARCEL B 4. 'The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY WLTAcoMA/080995/RLK • , • • CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A (Continued) Order No.: 510937 Your No.: NESS/RADOVICH PROPERTIES LEGAL DE�CRIPTION EXHIBIT (Paragraph 4 of Schedule A continuation) PARCEL A: LOTS 1 THROUGH 6 AND LOTS 24 THROUGH 34, BLOCK 36 IN C. D. HILLMAN'S EARLINGTON GARDENS ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SEATTLE, DIVISION NO. 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 17 OF PLATS, PAGE 74 IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; TOGETHER WITH VACATED THOMAS AVENUE S.W. (83RD AVENUE S.) ADJACENT THERETO, VACATED BY CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE NUM:ER 3195; EXCEPT THE EAST 40 FEET OF SAID VACATED AVENUE; EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE STA E OF WASHINGTON FOR PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1 BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RE ORDING NUMBER 5443689. PARCEL B: LOTS 7 THROUGH 23, BLOCK 36 IN C. D. HILLMAN'S EARLINGTON GARDENS ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SEATTLE, DIVISION 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 17 OF PLATS, PAGE 74, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1 BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 5443689. • CHICAGO TITLE INSUTRANCE COMPANY cltacma6/1-15-97/rlm CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY • A.L.TA.COMMITMENT • SCHEDULE B Order No.: 510937 Your No.: NESS/RADOVICH PROPERTIES Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. GENERAL EXCEPTIONS A. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. B. Encroachments,overlaps,boundary line disputes,or other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises. C. Easements,or claims of easements,not shown by the public records. D. Any lien,or right to a lien,for contributions to emplo}Jee benefit funds,or for state workers' compensation,or for services,labor,or material heretofore or hereafter furnished,all as imposed by law,and not shown by the public records. E. Taxes or special assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the public records. F. Any service,installation,connection,maintenance,tap,capacity or construction charges for sewer,water, electricity,other utilities,or garbage collection and disposal. G.Reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authozizing the issuance thereof; Indian tribal codes or regulations,Indian treaty or aboriginal rights,including easements or equitable servitudes. H. Water rights,claims,or title to water. I. Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims or other matters,if any,created,first appearing in the public records,or attaching subsequent to the effectiv i date hereof but prior to the date the ' proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS FOLLOW • CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY WLTACOMH CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 000510937 • Your No.: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS A 1. UNDERGROUND UTILITY EASEMENT AND THE •TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION PURPOSE: UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATION LINES AREA AFFECTED: SOUTHERLY 15 FEET OF SAID LOTS 17 THROUGH 20, INCLUSIVE AND THE SOUTHERLY 15 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 20 FEET OF SAID VACATED THOMAS AVENUE SOUTHWEST (83RD AVENUE SOUTHWEST) (EVANS AVENUE) RECORDED: MAY 7, 1981 RECORDING NUMBER: 8105070498 CONTAINS COVENANT PROHIBITING STRUCTURES OVER SAID EASEMENT OR OTHER ACTIVITIES WHICH MIGHT ENDANGER THE UNDERGROUND SYSTEM. CC 2. THIS PARAGRAPH HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY OMITTED. C 3 . RELINQUISHMENT OF ACCESS TO STAVE HIGHWAY NUMBER 1 AND OF LIGHT, VIEW AND AIR BY DEED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON: RECORDED: JUNE 22, 1962 RECORDING NUMBER: 5443689 D 4 . EASEMENTS, IF ANY, RESERVED BY CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE NUMBER 3195. E AFFECTS: VACATED THOMAS AVE SW F 5. PAYMENT OF THE REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX, IF REQUIRED. THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SITUATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF LOCAL TAXING AUTHORITY OF CITY IOF RENTON. PRESENT RATE IS 1.780. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY cltacmbl/1-5-97/rlm CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA.CO i4MITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) • Order No.: 510937 Your No.: NESS/RADOVICH PROPERTIES SPECIAL E CEPTIONS ANY CONVEYANCE DOCUMENT MUST Bi ACCOMPANIED BY THE OFFICIAL • WASHINGTON STATE EXCISE TAX AF IDAVIT. THE APPLICABLE EXCISE TAX MUST BE PAID AND THE AFFIDAVIT APPROVED AT THE TIME OF THE RECORDING OF THE CONVEYANCE DOCUMENTS. CD 6. THIS PARAGRAPH HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY OMITTED. CE 7. THIS PARAGRAPH HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY OMITTED. CF 8 . THIS PARAGRAPH HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY OMITTED. CG 9. THIS PARAGRAPH HAS BEEN INTENT ONALLY OMITTED. AV 10. MATTERS DISCLOSED BY SURVEY RE ORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9803109003; AND BY PHYSICAL IN PECTION MADE MAY 30, 1998, AS FOLLOWS: ' A. PLYWOOD FENCE, APPURTENANT TO THE WESTERLY ADJOINER, IS 1.4 FEET EAST OF PROPERTY LINE IN ORTHWESTERLY PORTION OF PARCEL B. B. CHAIN LINK FENCE, APPURTENANT TO THE WESTERLY ADJOINER, EXTENDS 21 FEET, MORE OR LESS OVER WES ERLY PROPERTY LINE OF PARCEL B. C. CHAIN LINK FENCE, APPURTENANT TO THE NORTHERLY ADJOINING I-405 FREEWAY, ON NORTHERLY PROPERTY LINE OF PARCELS A AND B, MORE OR LESS. - CH 11. THIS PARAGRAPH HAS BEEN INTENT ONALLY OMITTED. CI 12. THIS PARAGRAPH HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY OMITTED. CJ 13. THIS PARAGRAPH HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY OMITTED. CK 14 . THIS PARAGRAPH HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY OMITTED. AB 15. TO PROVIDE AN EXTENDED COVERAGE OWNER'S POLICY GENERAL EXCEPTIONS A THROUGH D WILL BE CONSIDERED W EN OUR INSPECTION AND/OR REVIEW OF SURVEY, IF REQUIRED, IS COMPLE ED. GENERAL EXCEPTIONS E THROUGH H WILL REMAIN IN THE OWNER'S POLICY TO ISSUE. A SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT WILL FOLLOW. IF THE ANTICIPATED CLOSING DATE IS LESS THAN 4 WEEKS FROM THE DATE OF _THIS COMMITMENT, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR TITLE OFFICER IMMEDIATELY. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY cltacmb2/r1m/1-15.97 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA.COMMITMENT SCHE ULE B (Cont. ued) Order No.: 510937 Your No.: NESS/RADOVICH PROPERTIES SPECIAL"EXCEPTIONS CN 16 . THIS PARAGRAPH HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY OMITTED. CL 17. THIS PARAGRAPH HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY OMITTED. ' CO 18. EXECUTION OF ENCLOSED AFFIDAVITI AND INDEMNITY WILL ASSIST IN CLEARING GENERAL EXCEPTIONS A AND D. CM 19. THIS PARAGRAPH HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY OMITTED. CP 20. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT FOR RADOVICH PROPERTIES L.L.C. . CP NOTE: A COPY OF THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT, AND AMENDMENTS THERETO, IF ANY, MU T BE SUBMITTED. AF NOTE 1: GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND HARGES, PAID IN FULL: ' YEAR: 1999 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 334040-6260-07 LEVY CODE: 2110 ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: $ 9,600.00 ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: $ 0.00 AMOUNT BILLED AND PAID: $ 167.41 AFFECTS: PARCEL A AG NOTE 2: GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAID IN FULL: YEAR: 1999 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 334040-6261-06 LEVY CODE: 2110 ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: $ 9,800.00 . ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: $ 0.00 AMOUNT BILLED AND PAID: $ 137.24 AFFECTS: PARCEL B CHICAGO TITLE IN§URANCE COMPANY cltacmb2/rlm/1.15-97 • • CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B • (Continued) Order No.: 510937 Your No.: NESS/RADOVICH PROPERTIES I ' SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS AN NOTE 3: EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1., 1997, DOCUMENT FORMAT AND CONTENT REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN IMPOSED BY WASHINGTON LAW. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF THE DOCUMENT BY THE COUNTY RECORDER. • FIRST PAGE OR COVER SHEET: 3" TOP MARGIN CONTAINING NOTHING EXCEPT THE RETURN ADDRESS. 1" SIDE AND BOTTOM MARGINS CONTAINING NO MARKINGS OR SEALS. TITLE(S) OF DOCUMENTS. RECORDING NO. OF ANY ASSIGNED, RELEASED OR REFERENCED DOCUMENT(S) . GRANTORS NAMES (AND PAGE NO. WHERE ADDITIONAL NAMES CAN BE FOUND) . GRANTEES NAMES (AND PAGE NO. WHERE ADDITIONAL NAMES CAN BE FOUND) . ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION (AND PAGE NO. FOR FULL DESCRIPTION) . ASSESSOR'S TAX PARCEL NUMBER(S) . RETURN ADDRESS (IN TOP 3" MARGIiN) . **A COVER SHEET CAN BE ATTACHEDII CONTAINING THE ABOVE FORMAT AND DATA IF THE FIRST PAGE DOES NOT CONTAIN ALL REQUIRED DATA. ADDITIONAL PAGES: 1" TOP, -SIDE AND BOTTOM MARGINS CONTAINING NO MARKINGS OR SEALS. ALL PAGES: NO STAPLED OR TAPED ATTACHMENTS. EACH ATTACHMENT MUST BE A • SEPARATE PAGE. ALL NOTARY AND OTHER PRESSURE SEALS MUST BE SMUDGED FOR VISIBILITY. FONT SIZE OF 8 POINTS OR LARGER. THE FOLLOWING MAY BE USED AS AN ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE DOCUMENTS TO BE RECORDED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF RCW 65.04 . SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL IESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WHICH MUST ALSO APPEAR IN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT: PARCEL A: PTN LOTS 1-6 & 24-34, BLOCK 36, HILLMANS EARLINGTON GARDENS #1, VOL 17 OF PLATS, PG 74, TGW PTN VAC ST ADJ. PARCEL B: PTN OF LOTS 7-23, BLOCK 36, HILLMANS EARLINGTON GARDENS #1, VOL 17 OF PLATS, PG 74 . • CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY cltacmb2/rlm/1-15A7 CHICAGO TITLE INS RANCE COMPANY A.L.TA.CO MITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 510937 • Your No.: NESS/RADOVICH PROPERTIES SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS END OF SCHEDULE B • • • • • CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY cltacme2/rlm/I-I5-97 1- .. .� . 0 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 1800 COLUMBIA CENTER, 701 5TH AVE, SEATTLE, UASHINGTiN 98104 IMPORTANT: This is not a Survey. It is furnished as a .acnvenience to locate the land indicated hereon with reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. SECTION 24. T. 23 N.. R. 4 E., W.M. F - _ _ ' —•-- - 8-•-- - R.O.W. • R.04W VADAT. P.O.T.STA.101•N.0 • 8 • S.H. No. 1) Et.O.O.T.LT.$TA.147+234 SR 405 (P. _ I.'•.1-. ;1 !.1 I 1 _I-•'1- 1 1 1 1 bj "lb l • i - -1.o••:rsI ! II j ; I• ! •I •I I d (MI ®®1-.YIlp. .0.W. 01. 1 I • i--1--• I I i d 1 A >D f0 • .1 • 1 I .-r- 1 .1 I 1 is I ! I •I--1.— - I_.--.--.-_._-._I 71 I 1 1 j L b - --1--I-..1.4 1� ]] 11i1 < ! 1 3 1 1 3 p O 36 - - -- -- -4 t. ce I 1 91 I 1• 1/1 IN 6L CK ,1 1 fi ' 1 » I I .. PARCEL A 32 i r a W i 1 <: 1 101 BLOCK 35 •i ` - --. 10 PARCEL•B', - JI __ _ 1 j in i BLOCK 37 I• zo 1 i N Bt• 1 cZ •__ -- -- - -- 4j 1 I 1 • 10 30 1 < • I 1 tr I a -. r. _I71. .-1_.l_.T-1.r--•T-•r-•r-•r-•r-i da 1n i� 14"" I 11 I I I I I I I I I I q•< .K 1 ' I T g- •.. . . .. . . . .. . . . . . .. . .I i. i i i i i i i i . .i o .I ILIL! ei 1 I A I I I I I 11 1 1 1 1 1 ' • ii I 1 .1 I I •I I I i 1 i i i i i20 40 1.017 110 Ifo 120 121 122 123 24 125 1 20 127 1 2e11 20 1 -•--•--•--•-1-•- 4. ; ; ; ; ; ; I; ; ; ; ; ; A:_ 1_.�`\(� J 1 L.- -•-- 41Q01• ` R 11110 0%PC~WOL M Cat ax.r _R ,SW 16th_STREET 410.01 (FOURTH AVE.) - v II L w..0r caw o rnnw elm ton R Mef7f•3VZ wt.,UIL) M93 0/ICMN0 -•--•-.............--.....-Il]lN'(KAT eA1L)..113x01(Y) -•— ,1 _•__MIL VI ION 1 R Mt.CMG NM r CAE 1 1 OW o 11041114 Id.TA I 40 1201 n EXCLUSIONS (Cont'd.) - - 4. Any claim, which arises out of the I : -action vesting in the Insured the estate or:.::rest insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (i) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (ii) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. ALTA LOAN POLIC FORM (10-17-92) The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason ofi: 1. (a) Any law,ordinance or governmental regulation(including but not limited to building and zoning laws,ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or elating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii)the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii)a separa- tion in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or(iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encum- brance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by(a)above,except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy,but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy,but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy(e kept to the extent that this policy insures the priority of the lien of the insured mortgage over any statutory lien for services, labor or material); or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness,to comply with applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured morltgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. 6. Any statutory lien for services, labor or materials (or the claim or priority of any statutory lien for services, labor or materials over the lien of the insured mortgage)arising from an improvement or work related to the land which is con- tracted for and commenced subsequent to Date of Policy and is not financed in whole or in part by proceeds of the indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage which at Date of Policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to advance. 7. Any claim,which arises out of the transaction creating the interest of the mortgagee insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (i) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (ii) the subordination of the interest of the insured mortgagee as a result of the application of the.doctrine of equitable subordination; or (iii) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. a aw ey ++44> ! . � »�, w>_„ �\ 0 $ 0.4 , \ 1 6 COMMITMENT $ . . FOR / • TITLE \ / / INSURANCE k . 9 , 4 ƒ { \» p,00 +S �� tIl \ It e e - > % . y \ �kCE c© \ \ :::!....1: , \ \ / 4 $ - / \ \ } \ i • R CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE \ COMPANY , \ & f 1 1 North Clark Street \ r . § Chicago, �1a2 4 - \, ill y(, w; +, «; az • �< t. _`1 , fl ° 0 10E/ MEN►pCA1G • G17YELOP®F REl�T®�NN N DEC 22 1999 ' ' ECENED - G Ff v • KING COUNTY BARGAIN & SALE DEED IN LIEU OF FORECLOSURE 1 NO EXCISE TAX DUE OF MORTGAGE ; i I E�AN 2 4 1991 1730t�8 In this instrument: (1) "Grantors" means: RUSSEL D. BROWN AND 1 1 SUSAN BROWN, aka SUSAN H. ' BROWN, Husband and Wife '1 1 • (2) "Grantee" means: ARTHUR S. NESS '3 • (3) The "Property" means: Real property situate in s King County, Washington, more particularly described as: _ , Lots 1-6 and Lots 24-34, Block 36 in C.D. .i;' .'.L x Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition to the c.: ::'. L; 0City of Seattle, Division No. 1, according to; — A i plat thereof, recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, . r °' :� C page 74, Records of King County, Washington. = `l _ ',* a7' RECITALS. vAiuiia i 00i 34 7R i O (1) Title to the property is held by�#tS�se D.90 n and Susan Brown, aka Susan H. Brown, Husban aft`34 . 4,m.]1.00 j (2) Title is subject to encumbrances of record and I two Deeds of Trust in favor of Grantees described as: a. A Deed of Trust executed by Grantors in ..-- favor of Ness-NWFB Employees Retirement Trust on or about a---- March 1, 1983, and recorded on March 18, 1983, in the King : 8 , County Real Property Records as Number 8303180055. The I E r terms of the Deed of Trust were modified pursuant to the a U• terms of a Modification of Deed of Trust1 dated 1 i September 26, 1986, which was recorded in the King County i r:: (r• Real Property Records on November )8, 1986, at 3 Number 861118113. The Deed of Trust was assigned by U Ness-NWFB Employees Retirement Trust to Arthur S. Ness by C an Assignment of Deed of Trust dated October 31, 1986, which was recorded in the King County Re l Property Records LC : on November 18, 1986, at Number 86111811 5, and was further assigned, as to an undivided one-half (1/2) interest, by '� °C Arthur S. Ness and other mesne assignments unto Susan N. McLeod; and b. A Deed of Trust executed by Grantors in favor of Ness-NWFB Employees Retirement Trust on or about ; i . ' • f. 0 • • 3 I • August 19, 1985, and recorded on August29, 1985, in the King County Real Property Records as Nmber 8508290593. The terms of the Deed of Trust were modified pursuant to the terms of a Modification of Deed of Trust dated • ? September 26, 1986, which was recorded in the King County Real Property Records on November 18, 1986, at . Number 861118114. The Deed of Trust was assigned by • Ness-NWFB Employees Retirement Trust te Arthur S. Ness by an Assignment of Deed of Trust dated October 31, 1986, which was recorded in the King County Real Property Records on November 18, 1986, at Number 8611181115, and was further assigned, as to an undivided one-half (1/2) interest, by Arthur S. Ness and other mesne assignments unto Susan N. • McLeod. ' Grantors have asked Grantee to accept an absolute deed of conveyance of the Property and to forebear action against Grantors on the Promissory Notes and Guaranty which are secured by the Deeds of Trust. GRANT NOW, THEREFORE, Grantors grant, bargain, sell, and convey to Grantee and to Grantee's heirs, personal • representatives, successors and assigns, all of the Property, with the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances belonging . or in any way appertaining to the Property, including, but not limited to, all of Grantor's rights in any reserve accounts for the a g �. p yment of taxes, insurance or other char es attributable 1 CV to the Property, to have end to hold the Property unto Grantee a and Grantee's heirs, personal representatives, successors and , a • 3 assigns forever. This Deed is absolute in effect and conveys to Grantee ` fee simple title in the Property. This Deek does not operate as a mortgage, trust deed, trust conveyance or security device of any kind. . By acceptance of this Deed, Grantee covenants and agrees that Grantee forever shall forebear taking any action • whatsoever to collect against Grantors on t�e Promissory Notes and Guaranty which are secured by the Deeds of Trust, other than by foreclosure of the Deeds of Trust, if necessary, and ' that in any proceeding to foreclose the Deeds of Trust, Grantee shall not seek or obtain a deficiency judgment against Grantors or against the heirs or assigns of Grantors. Grantors acknowledge that they desire to avoid litigation by granting this Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure. -2- . . , 0 0 • Grantors waive, surrender, convey, and relinquish any equity of redemption and statutory rights of redemption concerning the Property and the Deeds of Trust. Grantors are not acting under mia�pprehension as to the legal effect of this Deed or under dux ss, undue influence, or misrepresentation by Grantee, Grantee's agent, or attorney or by any other person. The true and actual consideration for this transfer consists of Grantee's waiver of Grantee's right to judgment against Grantors personally under the Promissory Notes secured by the Deeds of Trust, and Grantee's waiver of Grantee's right • to deficiency judgment against Grantors. Grantee may retain all payments previously made on the secured debt with no duty to account therefor. Grantee does not expressly or impliedly agree to assume or to pay any principal balance of the Promissory Notes or of any other debt, lien, charge or obligation which relates . • to or is attributable to the Property. '. . . This-Deed does not effect a merge of the fee `- • ownership and the liens of the Deeds of Trust described above. The fee and the liens shall hereafter remain separate and distinct. Cr) In construing this Deed, and where the context so ; • p requires, the singular includes the plural) and all grammatical . N changes shall be implied to make provisions of this instrument applicable equally to corporations and to individuals. D IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantors have executed this instrument this /2 day of January, 1991. USSEL D. BROWN',ry, , • 'rn . . SUSAN BROWN -•3_ 1 O.:• • t` fi;ti:e: :Ys c':' 15.1% -V i•.- \+:,:, . Tl ' O t ago 0 E STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. County of ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence • that RUSSEL D. BROWN signed this instrument, and acknowledged . • said instrument to be his own free and voluntary act for the purposes mentioned in this instrument. • DATED this /7 day of January, 1991. r/ • Notary Public for 4 n toR7 Residing At: i' . STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • ` `JAL ) sm. f: County of USX . ) • I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence ' -Rd' that SUSAN BROWN signed this instrument, and acknowledged said • Cr) instrument to be her free and voluntary act for the purposes i p mentioned in this instrument. • mci- (V DATED this /7 day of January, 1991. • Notary Public for Wa&n"—to Residing At: •51- ! 4p-etdG -7 7-I/ BARGAIN AND SALE DEED THIS SPACE PROVIDED FOR RECORDER'S USE RUSSEL D. BROWN and • SUSAN DROWN, Husband and . Wife, • • Grantors, • ARTHUR S. NESS, Grantee. -4- ;_,. a �,nztira..1.11:4f1ifi .. —'r;•4 ... :V ....:r„�(•r+ wkE;.,,Spy::, } • - .a `�1. ,^ ,. • • • • Filed for record at.the request of Arthur S. Ness. i AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: John H. Doran, Esq. • Lane Powell Spears Lubersky ' / • 520 B.W. Yamhill, Suite 800 Portland, OR 97204 • • . • f: t. g Cn • O E t -5- ',.ao�. — aC: "•6. .� _ y':.•'.i.�i.:i. r�:.i4•r. S.,,r'•'c�y' '+. '.v� .1••'1•T�t�.;i•'• •.F'• «L:•.Ji%V;.+ t �'.. .0'�.1- St•...:�i.i�,r',•,�7::•ryy'F�7{✓fw�.:r�." ,..a,.. ,.r� .�„ ,...,.•.:.s�.:-=,�_. .Y�.-.. ''is�a.., !°". r=,l;.•.d.;L•.:��7�'L • . . . • } • O - 1. ' i ' . I . RECEIvEO 1 IIS DAY t OChicagoTitle • • Insurance Company • JLU 24 14s in'si ESTOPPEL AFFIDAVIT EiY in: :i;.: .•.t;;IF _ Affidavit of individual Giving Deed In Lieu of Foreclosure: h""' 1' . yriuAicd 1107_.5 1R 1 _ R1=CD r 6.00 STATE OF WASHINGTON ► RECFEE 2.00 1 )55 CASHSL O' **C.OO COUNTY OF ) .q . ,Sc�,1,gSEL Di&$OWbJ and SUSa� BROWN '' ",being first duly sworn,each for himself r and herself,deposes and says:That they are the identical parties who made,executed.and de- livered that certain cue d 10 ARTKUR S NESS adated the / day of air 18 7.1 ,conveying the following described property,to-wit: • ' SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION That alliants now are,and at all times herein mentioned,were husband and wife; That the aforesaid deed is Intended to be and is an absolu le conveyanCe of the title to said premises i•• to the grantee named therein,and was not and Is not now intended 09 a mortgage,trust conveyance, ••:1 • or security of any kind;that It was the intention of alliants as grantom in said deed loconvey,snd by L('1 said deed these affiants did convey to the grantee therein all theirrlithL title.and interest absolutely , 31, Cr) In and to said premises;that possession of said premises has been surrendered to the grantee; O — That In the execution and delivery of said deed alliants were not acting under any . misapprehension as to the effect thereof,and acted freely and voluntarily and were not acting O under coercion or duress; •ft f7) •'x , Thatthe consideration for said deed was and Is payment to afllanls of the sum of � • S NIL by grantee,and the full cancellation i' of all debts,obligations,coste,andchar essecuredbythatcertaindeedoltrustheretoforeexisting p on said property executed by Affiants 1 grantor, :j to Transamerica Title Insurance Company I • as Trustee, for * as beneficiary,dated the 1st I day of March ,1 983 , 7 •* Recording*81011 A OA55. XinlaCounty,Washington,and the reconveyance of said property L. under said deed of trust;that at the lime of making said deed afflants belleved and now believe that the aforesaid consideration therefor represents the lair value of the property so deeded; • This affidavit is made for the protection and benefit of the grant le in said deed,his successors and assigns,and all other parties hereafter dealing with or who mays acquire an interest in the pro- 1 • party herein described,and particularly for the benefit of Chicago Title Insurance Company ;I which is about to Insure the title to said property In reliance thereon,and any other title company A which may hereafter Insure the title to said property; rt That alliants,and each of them will testily,declare,depose or certify before any competent 1 .6" trieunaloofficer.orperson,In anycase now pending orwhich may hereallerbe instituted,to the truth .a 1(3' of the particular facts hereinabove set forth. 1 a • . . a _Bus sel`->s. Brow. -- - • I.: 0242anisusan Brown STATE OF WASHINGTON ) `'J )ss. , County of J� / ) •.1. On this day personally appeared before me RUSSEL D. BROWN and SUSAN BROWN, 1 to me known to be the Individual described In and who executed the within and foregoing `• instrument,and acknowledged that they signed the same as :'n free and voluntary act and deed,for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. %; .fin,'} . GIVEN under my hand and official seal this /7 day of 1991 . "Ness-NWFB Employees' Retirement Trust /) / `.� **Also C8508290593 (�L ' Pubiioina forth Slat ashingt ) ACKNOWLI06�[NI INDMOWL residing al I -- o o.l :�.. .. .- -` .. - , .,\ 1r • • • • • • • 'Lots 1-6 ,t. • :t and Hillman'sEarlington Gardens AdditionCto�the City of Seattle, Division No. 1, according to plat thereof, recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, . ' page 74, Records of King County, Washington. '" ' • i; • {•t • it • r • Ln ti N O) ;y • • • • • • O: . \ ll a'�vrLs: 'l -�T 4 a� �t..r ��E ^ MJ L • • J . 1 s. . • • � • . • • 1IIII . I • • • O0 • . • ;: [-:., • Filed for Record at the Request of THIS SPACE PROVIDED FOR o Arthur S. Nees RECORDER'S USE ' '•'' f,_, . After Recording Return to: • Janet E. Garrow, Esq. •"1L. Cairncrose 6 Hempelmann ` ,'• 701 Fifth Avenue, 70th Floor • Seattle, •WA 98104-7016 • o t.. CORRECTION N i::: in vt; `j • BARGAIN i SALE DEED IN LIEU OF FORECLOSURE '' . 4 a. OF MORTGAGE • ',1 Nt o ;•••L el In this instrument: m • o (1) `Grantors" means: RUSSEL D. BROWN AND SUSAN N 1• BROWN, aka SUSAN H. BROWN, m '•- ON - i1 Husband and Wfe m ':,:: (2) `Grantee" means: ARTHUR S. NESS .. 1 (3) The "Property" means: Real propety situate in P.L . King County, Washington, more particularly described as: (%:: - 1 0:. • . Lots 1-6 and Lots 24-34, Block 36 in C.D. W.. 51 Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition to the ,.t• 61' City of Seattle, Division No. 1, according to il . . the plat thereof, recorded in Volume•17 of 4 Plate page 74, Records of King County, . • Washington; TOGETHER WITH vacated Thomas r; Avenue S.W. (83rd Avenue S.) adjacent thereto; EXCEPT the east 40 feet thereof, ' • vacated by City of Renton Ordinance Number 3195; EXCEPT that portion conveyed to the State of Washington for Primary State Highway, No. 1, by deed recorded under Recording r., ?�• ' Number 5443689, situated in the County of King, State of Washington. .4: b` ; RECITALS r; el t (1) Title to the property is held by Russel D. Brown c' and Susan Brown, aka Susan H. Brown, Husband and Wife. ` " ' •-_ ,!_? {Y?;•4 k.V ;WJm 4610T P; ni1F1;teas • • . 0 . ' l . • • I .. • :r r ' 1 .. ' :` ., 7 (2) Title is subject to encumbrances of record and two Deeds of Trust in favor of Grantees described as' s• a. h Deed of Trust executed by Grantors in favor of Ness-NWFB Employees Retirement Trust on or about March 1, '; ': 1983, and recorded on March 18, 1983, in the King County P. . Real Property Records as Number 8303160055. The terms of "' • the Deed of Trust were modified pursuant to the terms of a ,;` . Modification of Deed of Trust dated September 26, 1986, ;?,,':, which was recorded in the King County Real Property Records '• . on November 18, 1986, at Number 861118113. The Dead of : • I. Trust was assigned by Neas-NWFB Employees Retirement Trust r•... : • to Arthur S. Ness by an Assignment of Deed of Trust dated i October 31, 1986, which was recorded in the King County Real Property Records on November 18, 1986, at Number 8611181115, and was further assigned, as to en undivided one-half (1/2) ;•':.;. interest, by Arthur S. Ness and other insane assignments unto r''•• Susan N. McLeod; and ,,,,' b. A Deed of Trust executed by Grantors in favor y:`;;i. of Ness-NWFB Employees Retirement Trust on or about • August 19, 1985, and recorded on August 29, 1905, in the c! King County Real Property Records as Number 8508290593. The . terms of the Deed of Trust wore modified pursuant to the hr terms of a Modification of Deed of Trust 'dated September 26, • 1986, which was recorded in the King County Real Property, V.':: Nr Records on November 18 1986, at Number 061118114. The Deed F.'. 1 co of Trust was assigned by Nees-NWFB Employees Retirement Trust to Arthur S. Ness by an Assignment oflDeed of Trust • 3 dated October 31, 1986, which was recorded in the King • P- County Real Property Records on November 18j 1986, at Number CD 8611181115, and was further assigned, as tolan undivided O` one-half (1/2) interest, by Arthur S. Nese and other mesne .. :I assignments unto Susan N. McLeod. , . • '• Grantors have asked Grantee to accept an absolute deed of conveyance of the Property and to forebear action against Grantors on the Promissory Notes and Guaranty which are secured • by the Deeds of Trust. • .. GRANT 3 NOW, THEREFORE, Grantors grant, bargai , sell, and convey to Grantee and to Grantee's heirs, personal 7.1 representatives, successors and assigns, all of the Property, with the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances belonging or . in any way appertaining to the Property, including, but not limited to, all of Grantor's rights in any reserve accounts for the payment of taxes, insurance or other chargeslattributable to the Property, to have and to hold the Property unto Grantee and • Grantee's heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns forever. ' - 2 - .• .. • . �iit.::.v.i�'.".: 3�6:4...liait:.•i:uii s:i:�:. 1:i�:: . . �. • • • i • • . F This Deed is absolute in effect and conveys to Grantee • ?• fee simple title in the Property. This Deed doei not operate as a mortgage, trust deed, trust conveyance or security device of r• any kind. By acceptance of this Deed, Grantee covenants and A . agrees that Grantee forever' shall forebear taking any action ' whatsoever to collect against Grantors on the Promissory Notes j` and Guaranty which are secured by the Deeds of Trust, other than by foreclosure of the Deeds of Trust, if necessary, and that in any proceeding to foreclose the Deeds of Trust, Grantee shall not • seek or obtain a deficiency judgment against Grantors or against • the heirs or assigns of Grantors. : ' Grantors acknowledge that they desire to avoid ' ' litigation by granting this Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure. Grantors waive, surrender, convey, and relinquish any • equity of redemption and statutory rights of redemption (.. , concerning the Property and the Deeds of Trust. Grantors are not acting under misapprehension as to the legal effect of this Deed or under duress, undue influence, or (. misrepresentation by Grantee, Grantee's agent, or attorney or by any other person. • The true and actual consideration for this transfer . • • 's .0 coneiete of Grantee's waiver of Grantee's right to judgment i •r against Grantors personally under the Promissory Notes secured by 1.. • ' CI the Deeds of Trust, and Grantee's waiver of Grantee's right to I, • • ! -0 • deficiency judgment against Grantors. Grantee may retain all ' payments previously made on the secured debt with no duty to ; • account therefor. - s Grantee does not expressly or impliedly agree to assume . 4 or to pay any principal balance of the Promissory Notes or of any - other debt, lien, charge or obligation which relates to or is , attributable to the Property. ' • This Deed does not effect a merger of the fee ownership • • and the liens of the Deed of Trust described above. The fee and • • the liens shall hereafter remain separate and distinct. • • z a In construing this Deed, and where the context so _ • requires, the singular includes the plural, and all grammatical " changes shall be implied to make provisions of this instrument applicable equally to corporations and to individuals. This Deed is given to correct that certain Deed between the same parties dated January 17, 1993, as Auditor's File III , No. 9101240734 which failed to include the vacated portion of ' Thomas Avenue S.W. (83rd Avenue S.) in the legal description. 3 _ • . • ---.. r=--•.: �-,-•r-- :-- • : • . • • t "' ter:,.. .�:..... s: . .- •�.- • '•i: '.lit :y' _ • • • • •. •.•L......u4.i'•.v..•i:•.. ._...•...«..:.z::.::L`..4....11:, - ,. ri/lL,..,..J-.2.3mD:.tt.V7L..1RtY..:•/.YM••....+.-..7.r��`Y.Y.w19x..•=Rao • • . I. , IN WITNES$ WHEREOF, Grantors have executed this • instrument this /7" day of 3 yyyy 1992. `� 4 P USSEL D. BROWN '. • SUSAN1A� • • • • 4 • i. s V '- + : • 1 N i i a• .• ! 3 • • - 4 _ • • • ' .. .d1., • • • •.. Ck,:'.. ;.w,:t:g).ty:!h,.••, 1%:44.4+�ii.5''n ti .:'''Ri! t:':fJ ' `-'lit'-•,4ir/`'t*":F:1.1'4T • • } • ' • • • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • ) BB. • , ' COUNTY OF KING ) • •. • • On this day personally appeared before me RUSSEL D. BROWN, • to me known to be the individual described in and who executed • • the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that ;3••,.;. . .• '• ; he signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed for the {.:,•:•,:_•• � , iuses and purposes therein mentioned. -GIVEN under my hand and official seal this /yo day of • • ►./ a J j , 1992. 'Or. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the Stat of Washington, residing at State. of • My commission expires //-9-9< `{ J • 'J • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) •. . - ) as. •1 COUNTY OF KING ) " :' •'• On this daypersonallyappeared before me SUSAN BROWN, to me '. • 31 d' known to be the individual described in and who executed the . 'a within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that ohs .p signed the same asher free and voluntary act and deed for the "'"° uses and purposes therein mentioned. • N •GIVEN under my hand and official seal this ,/5//k-day of Q` tr Lt/ , 1992. Yi• .••• / /Ael._. AZ- l/psi • •'•.•:a .:..:. :! NOTARY PUBLIC in end for the •• : Statf ngton, residing at . My commission expires //-7-9 c 33519.1421 ' • - 5 - .. . ,•. :f,••,>+..., TI•is•::{y:.'t`.:Z-.1.{'i.'11;.}.;I'i :...�+r •.;I'i.�i•""�a....rfir. _ 4• .• •.. _ .,.. •� .. . • 'J•'••+::.ter.♦.-'4.:.••y ' • `ii .. . :tt it:. :_. •... •• I i ... •'.s`•'vim¢':saiar claisa• � , s P. t3 a 2 V 1 After Recording.Return To: 8 Robin 8.Parisi.Esq. Parisi&Parisi • I S.W.Columbia,Suite 680 Portland.Oregon 97258 to • IA OUITCLMM DEED B s O N KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that ARTHUR S. NESS. hereinafter called Grantor, whose address is 14005 S. E. 44th Place. Bellevue, Washington 98006. as a m gift.conveys and quitclaims to STUART C.NESS, hereinafter called Grantee.whose address Ql is 403 let cc WAY It idf (IMJ1 It WA an undivided onesixth(116) interest as tenant in common in the foilowing-described real property situated in King County, Washington: Lots 1-6 and Lots 24-34. Block 36,in C. D. Hillman's!Arlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle.Division No. 1.according to plat thereof,recorded in Volume 17 of • Plats,page 74.Records Of King County,Washington. DATED this 541day of -ow-a'""-4-'/ . 1997. w Arthur S.Ness STATE OF OREG(AJ 1 )ss. County of IVIRVft A t} ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on A11t/Pµ 13 V1Z. 10 , 1997, . by Arthur S. Ness as his voluntary act and deed. ;:��- t.i Notary tic for Oregon 1in A ' '' Cill My commission expires: 1012P/O0 f turvicancommisas MD mart E1600584 03/25/98 ,00 .00 -- .. ._, ,..-.r ..,...,•.r,.♦•t,o:44pae�-3•lwwll i?sriiN7�'r_••'. . . .•� i..x',% :..:p:•:W:�+• :_—1;;,;� , • , ' ',J! , :. t •: .• •.� �T. a, ,'r •le• 1 i.Y'• ''A , 4. � a . f r t �t ..-t: Jr-,.:dry;.;• • V.tt T,ta r.'r;_•,i•-EQ{v.,.-.:1 '. 'i..••*ct f' ..irl • . . a • •43`)i. .!• .-ret yt2gP F..•;ir•;*4-I+c„R � ;,r, �N • IN - • .♦ •--.-,.-ArlIc•..+.:t '.i.. ` +'II�trOtiWAer-r • I • , iA • 4. 1 . . ' After Recording Return To: F •• - John H. Doran E 520 S.W.Yaminr7l,Snite'1100 Portland,OR 97204 i 1 • 1 OLITCLAIAJ DEED-STATUTORY FORM I I 0 The Grantor,ARTHUR S.NESS,of Bellevue,Washington,as a gift,conveys and gr quitclaims to STUART C.NESS an undivded one-sixth(1/6)interest(including after-acquired tide)as tenant in common In the following described real estate: I. s 2 Lots 1-6 and Lots 24-34, Block 36, in C. D. Hillman's H Harlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle,Division No. 1.according to plat thereof,recorded in Volume 17 of Plats,page 74,Records of King County,Washington; • 2 situated in the county of King,state of Washington. m 7 . . O) Dated this day of December,1992. • • a(2.4 .••••.# Ad ....02-4(id-- Arthur S.Ness Omit ilt& Q!r Arthur S.Ness Grantor Unto Stuart C.Ness, Grantee . • • leCON10743iwna= E1600383 03/tl5/90 .00 .00 , • •,�... -..-j.•,•. , • • r • _ • _ ..-_._ .rc.„_ "'.o-...c�tiS•ir..::i[i:i.Li.1.4 ...,• . ti.:.toc...41,: � .G.ii .o.b�. ' v.=••• • - :,,i.X.1:44.tiftif - • ,.....;14-,•45.:4:45?›9#07-le••*'•!AfP•I.P.,=1*..:4t.,_liff:vr5-V?;-,--!;• •• ..Pis . • _•7 •'5;• •••• n•••^ • . • • . • . • • 444Feg. • • • • • • •-:•:-.....vi....y.NS7V1-vr„ii:**1.4:4.:t• • • •- •••:*•••.•%1:;i• -7•7 • •.• •.•••:111 /.1r1;'.1,44erbrie .41AAL•ifr•Z • • :•• .4•••. • ••••i•• tb•Ne? • • • • .; 4 5 •;rflicigAe;•10-t:.e; 9 /1 . • , • :•:%••:• 3:371:04••:„0/...Qii.1•424.,.. .k.;:,....7risii•Niggiff...;.4(444.1,:4- • • • .••• •••••• •1 ' ••;•••••• • • .., as . • • • - 4-••••' • ••Y• ti.• --40-r•"•-1erno:0 ••-* • -; 41r/44"‘3'%". *i• • • • ' • •••••••' •'' vliliam.tez.17,1 • r1 q•• • • ,• •••1:-1,t• ' ."*. -34.40 .4 %-;* ." • • ••• ••-', • '14 Tk:•••'1.• . , s".• c T•••••*•;•—ef ••••••• •• • ••1• e• • '• •• . . •e • 7; - • • • STATE OP WASHINGTON ) • )is. • County of King Iri • • I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ARTHUR S.NESS is the person who or pearr.41 before me,and said peaon acknowledged that he signed this instmment and acknowledged it to be his free.and voluntary act for dtc uses and paposes mentioned in this instrument. SUB ND MORN TO before me this j.day of December, 1992. ogrilf": , J.1'0 •••415510 0 •fl,C. V1/40/(.• N ;,,, = •t tr.-4‘,0 eide err Notary Publi5.kr on Residing at: ta r: • 4:••••-.1.... C C"fee fe•AS•Sj O.% EVIA:e IsItS I. 0464 SH: `Lkl.•- t -400esetittn4-- • . V! 0 ao • • cr) • • -••; • • .• • 2 ItCONIEDJ211213113.1413 73. .'t7g5.,,r.74YgrarZw".7717.7=4,77PV:%.42.i. • -.; .% .g74•-*Ie••"!'Zi.1.,j .; • v•jr.., y.. t•;r.r • • • d,ur • :�.;r=•L.+r'•a '{i1R :S•7_, bwM., 3 t?.✓.•..•:„l�-)'.N+i1G4:rry�,re-- tiv V_ r,, r' ,: s <.I : i� ?i 4.tit+i ;A• '-ti.YL . 1�,.� • • • . • ..- . .. •L• .•L.`-.:t"4i„"ii,ieAqlf7:Y-• • • • 06 • ' a • • I. • ► • •...:li•Si ciwa miw,:::'votarcnv...•...._. . ..- ... • �-� I • F W V Attu Rmmdias.Item To: • Robin B.Parisi,Esq. ss Parisi At Parisi S • I S.W.Columbia,Suite 680 ' Portland,Oregon 97258 • gt • L QUITCLAIM DEED i• 4-2 » T. '11 U) KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that ARTHUR S. NESS, hereinafter called Grantor, whose address is 14005 S. E. 44th Place, Bellevue, Washington 98006. as a :: . O gift,conveys and quitclaims to STEVEN A. NESS.hereinafter called Grantee, whose address CD is ptst10 St.! anus- Ik11 Lie Perk Die . an undivided one-thud (1/3) interest as • tenant in common in the folios/lug-described real property s mated in King•County, .Washington: `. Lots 1-6 and Lots 2434,Block 36, in C. D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition to _: • the City of Seattle,Division No. 1, according to plat thereof.recorded in Volume 17 of . Plats,page 74, Records of King County. Washington. ,I' DATED this day of ?�-• •G•'✓ , 199997; 2 Arthur S. Ness :'r STATE OF 0ke Ur•_&i ) County of nenta&._ ) .�.a This instrument was acknowledged before me on AJMI[_Y*-tO s•+' l a . 1997, . by Arthur S.Ness as his voluntary act and deed. • WHOA Mk M MGM TOMB Kc;.)• ttataarts 61001 Notary yic for Oregon �. � COMMOMMIanMISts MY tatrttssaott txrrrtt COMM n.tmo My commission expires: /0P-3 OO _ M. ¶r, E1600586 O3/25/98 .00 _00 ' z•:;. • • , •f • ... .r n i ;r1.•i.(-.. ..�iJv.Lu.._...-.wet-++.a 4�1niT•r' wrlr'ir�w{.awi•�µre . • • C: • • • • • • • . • ... .... .. . ,. ' • ` F ; • After Recording.Return To: Robin B.Parisi.Esq. Parisi do Parisi 1 S.W.Columbia,Suite 680 Ponland,Oregon 97258 • QUITCLAIM DEED 1N • co KNOW ALL. MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that ARTHUR S. NESS. hereinafter U) called Grantor, whose address is 14005 S. E. 44th Place, Bellevue, Washington 98006, as a gift, conveys and quitclaims to SUSAN K. McLEOD, hereinafter called.Grantee, whose a address is tAk ,eg. 97166" , an undivided one-third (1/3) interest as tenant in common in the fo116Wing-described real property situated in King County, 015 Washington: Cn Lots 1-6 and Lots 24-34, Block 36. in C. D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition to • the City of Seattle.Division No. 1,according to plat thereof,recorded in Volume 17 of Plats.page 74.Records of King County,Washington. � DATED this '"{ day of ?-07.1-0-‘44-4---1 . 1997. Arthur S.Ness STATE OF 04E&)L) ) ss. County of Al iAN ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on AlblIFAABria. /0 , 1997, by Arthur S. Ness as his voluntary act and decd. a.Notary blic for Oregon ;1j IOW NI cowrssnan tuce-oareGait crafts My commission expires: lO/ol$t 4 7 E1600567 03/23/98 .00 • .00 • ' 6 • • • BARGAIN S SALE DEED IN LIEU OF FORECLOSURE • OF MORTGAGE KING COUNTY • . , NO EXCISE TAX DUE In this instrument: ��p�'� Ug (1) "Grantors" means: • RUSSEL D. BROWN AND .. SUSAN BROWN, aka SUSAN H. • BROWN, Husband and Wife. '� •J (2) "Grantee" means: SUSAN N. FicLEOD. t (3) The "Property" means: Real property situate in 1 King County, Washington, more particularly described as: r i Lots 7-23, Block 36 in C.D. Hillman's - 1 Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of �_�_• ;- i Seattle, Division No. 1, according to plat -• • -a a, thereof, recorded in Volume 17 of lots, _• ` r page 74, Records of King County, Washington. :. EFFCITAIJI N Q '• Cc)O (1) Title to the property is held by Russel D.- B ro.)h s � , N and Susan Brown, aka Susan H. Brown, Husband and Wife. `"' — • i O (2) Title is subject to encumbrances of record and • � two Deeds of Trust in favor of Grantees described as: • a. A Deed of Trust executed by Grantors in favor of Ness-NWFB Employees Retirement Trust on or about l March 1, 1983, and recorded on March 18, 1983, in the King • County Real Property Records as Number 8303180055. The • terms of the Deed of Trust were modified pursuant to the terms of a Modification of Deed of Trust dated • j September 26, 1986, which was recorded in the King County 1 Real Property Records on November 18, 11986, at IL? Number 861118113. The Deed of Trust was assigned by • t0 Ness-NWFB Employees Retirement Trust to Arthur S. Ness by ., ' ' an Assignment of Deed of Trust dated October 31, 1986, • • •,� f • which was recorded in the King County Real Property Records m(5 on November 18, 1986, at Number 8611181115, and was further assigned, as to an undivided one-half (1/2) interest, by Arthur S. Ness and other mesne assignments unto Susan N. McLeod; and i ` c b. A Deed of Trust executed by Grantors in favor of Ness-NWFB Employees Retirement Trust on or about 7J/V1/64 40726 is RECC' F 9.00 • • RECFEE 2.00 CASHSL 4,1,a,I1.00 • 0 f' • • ' •o ( • .\ . �_\ I 1 . • ` . • O ' 0 August 19, 1985, and recorded on August 29, 1985, in the King County Real Property Records as Number 8508290593. The terms of the Deed of Trust were modified pursuant to the terms of a Modification of Deed of Trust dated I: September 26, 1986, which was recorded in the King County '• Real Property Records on November 18, 11986, at f Number 861118114. The Deed of Trust was assigned by . Ness-NWFB Employees Retirement Trust to Arthur S. Ness by • • j an Assignment of Deed of Trust dated October 31, 1986, 1 which was recorded in the King CountyiReal Property Records on.November 18, 1986, at Number 8611181115, and was further assigned, as to an undivided one-half (1/2) interest, by . Arthur S. Ness and other mesne assignments unto Susan N. • McLeod. t1 I Grantors have asked Grantee to accept an absolute deed of conveyance of the Property and to forebear action against Grantors on the Promissory Notes and Guaranty which are secured i by the Deeds of Trust. GRANT NOW, THEREFORE, Grantors grant, bargain, sell, and convey to Grantee and to Grantee's heirs, personal ' representatives, successors and assigns, all of the Property, CL with the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances belonging i. • or in any way appertaining to the Property, including, but not N— limited to, all of Grantor's rights in any reserve accounts for the payment of taxes, insurance or other charges attributable '� ' N to the Property, to have and to hold the Property unto Grantee •i and Grantee's heirs, personal representatives, successors and 1 O assigns forever. ' CMI This Deed is absolute in effect and conveys to Grantee fee simple title in the Property. This Deed does not operate as a mortgage, trust deed, trust conveyance or security device of any kind. By acceptance of this Deed, Grantee covenants and agrees that Grantee forever shall forebear taking any action • whatsoever to collect against Grantors on the Promissory Notes and Guaranty which are secured by the Deeds of Trust, other . than by foreclosure of the Deeds of Trust, if necessary, and • that in any proceeding to foreclose the Deeds of Trust, Grantee • shall not seek or obtain a deficiency judgment against Grantors or against the heirs or assigns of Grantors. Grantors acknowledge that they desire to avoid litigation by granting this Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure. -2- .11 • i • ' 0 \ s 0 MIll I r .. . ' • i • Grantors waive, surrender, convey, and relinquish any equity of redemption and statutory rights of redemption concerning the Property and the Deeds of Trust. • Grantors are not acting under misapprehension as to the legal effect of this Deed or under duress, undue influence, or misrepresentation by Grantee, Grantee's agent, or attorney • or by any other person. • • The true and actual consideration for this transfer • consists of Grantee's waiver of Grantee's right to judgment , against Grantors personally under the Promissory Notes secured by the Deeds of Trust, and Grantee's waiver of Grantee's right to deficiency judgment against Grantors. Grantee may retain all payments previously made on the secured debt with no duty i to account therefor. t • Grantee does not expressly or impliedly agree to assume or to pay any principal balance of the Promissory Notes • • or of any other debt, lien, charge or obligation which relates to or is attributable to the Property. This Peed does not effect a merger of the fee ownership and the liens of the Deeds of Trust described above. • ' The fee and the liens shall hereafter remain separate and • r distinct. IA. In construing this Deed; and where the context so Mrequires, the singular-includes the plural; and all grammatical • changes shall be implied to make provisions of this instrument , 0 applicable equally to corporations and to individuals. :d N ' t• p IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantors have executed this 4instrument this �Z day of January, 1991. cn ''llttUSSELLD../�BROWH - er-6.--r---- 4",/ / vsfy + SUSAN DROWN -3- ,• • - • ---tea =:.;^yt� ; i1, >f�,.3y�,�,.,,r. , -- . _ j'�: . � ••I•1 I . ..a . -'t• . .. tw77F`s'rflt it3�J'^: i saia .ig� )'% .,.' .. �:•••i L� . • ® `c 0 • • • • • • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • �/ ) ss. County of /� ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence • • that RUSSEL D. BROWN signed this instrument, and acknowledged • •• said instrument to be his own free and voluntary act for the purposes mentioned in this instrument. • DATED this /7 day of January, 1991. Q No ary Public for/,�N�as gton • Residing At: J[� � STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ` ss. County of ) • K • I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that SUSAN BROWN signed this instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be her free and voluntary act for the purposes i mentioned in this instrument. N DATED this /7 . day of January, 1991. • CD CF) No ary Public fo Wa to Residing t: 7-7- r/ BARGAIN AND SALE DEED THIS SPACE PROVIDED FOR • RECORDER;'S USE RUSSEL D. BROWN and I e SUSAN BROWN, Husband and • Wife, Grantors, SUSAN N. NcLEOD, Grantee. ' I -4-• . rqr7^:Sira^ri+sa Z' i*ti, 1y+ - ; . .:. s.:.';_t_ 0 • i' . P Filed for record at the request j. of Susan N. McLeod. AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: • John N. Doran, Esq. ' • Lane Powell Spears Lubersky f • 520 S.W. Yamhill, Suite 800 Portland, OR 97204 I. 1.- . . • . y: C�) • i (V Q') • i, • VA • i U • II ,: . -5- 1 :;77 .- -,. -.rrZ.. • 1 . ..d :? . .... . i .a �N.. n.A1'. .; . ;•i• . y` r '. .: :i :•.•':' : ::'': N7i.•• ....3. ': .: 7: a O ' ■ BECEIvEU IBIS DAY • • 0 ChicagoTitle • Insurance•Company It(111'91 .JAN 24 1 ESTOPPEL AFFIDAVIT BY IHi_LI• •:.:;ti CIF_ 78/uf/i4 h1!iJ(.1,:.i;(MO737 1R .. Affidavit of Individual Giving Deed In Lieu of Foreclosure: KcCG F 6.00 R CFEE 2.00 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) CASHSt_ **'*+'EI.Do )ss COUNTY OF ) RUSSEL D. BROWN and SUSAI BROWN '' ,being 14st duly sworn,each for himself and herself,deposes and says:That they are the identical parties who made,executed,and de- livered that certain de Ad to Su s ae.1 N. McLeod I dated the / day of. 19 4l,conveying the following described Properly.to-wit: • SEE ATTACHED•LEGAL DESCRIPTION That alliants now are,and at all times herein mentioned,were husband and wife; . t • That the aforesaid deed Is intended to be and Is an absolute conveyanCeof the title to said premises to thegrantee namedtherein,end notandis not nowintended ass mortgage,trustconveyance, • jor security of any kind;that it was the intention of alliantsasgrantorsinsaiddeedtoconvey,andby t` said deed theseal Slants did convey to the grantee thereln all their right,Mile,and interest absolutely CDin and to said premises;that possession of said premises has been surrendered to the grantee; •• CV Thal In the execution and delivery of said deed affiants were not acting under any 9 misapprehension as to the effect thereof,and acted freely and voluntarily and were not acting O7 under coercion or duress; • Thal the consideration for said deed was and is payment to afliants of the sum of S NIL by grantee,and the full cancellation of of i debts,obllgallons,cosls,and charges secured by that certain deed of trust heretofore existing on said property executed by Af f cants •grantor, i to Transamerica Title Insurance Company as Trustee. • for * as beneficiary,dated the •1st day of March ,1983 , • ** Recording*sum nm ROOSS. xi ngCounty,Washington,and thereconveyance of said property under said deed of trust;that at the time ol making said deed afflants believed and new believe that _ 1 the aforesaid consideration therefor represents the lair value of the property so deeded; • a_ i • This affidavit is made for the protection and benefit of the grantee In said deed,his successors I 8 I. and assigns,and all other parties hereafter dealing with or who mayacqulre an interest in the pro- Y • N(n petty herein described,and particularly for the benefit of Chicago Title Insurance Company y c U) which is about to insure the title to said property In reliance thereon,and any other title company 1-2 which may hereafter insure the title to said property; i= - I F cr That alliants,and each of them will testily,declare,depose or certify before any competent x • s tribunal,officer,orperson,Inanycasenowpendingorwhichmayhereafterbeinstituted,tothetruth ca ol the particular facts hereinabove set forth. .� a•. tr e --Rus • D-.Brown_... a Susan Brown STATE OF WASHINGTON 1 Zip��n I . . r/ )ss. County of A‘.2_„,f> ) I On this day personally appeared before me RUSSEL D. BROWN and SUSAN BROWN, `y 1 to me known to be the individual described In and who executed the within and foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that they signed the same as free and voluntary act and deed,for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. :21 GIVEN under my hand and official seal this /7 day of 19 91 . I *Ness-NWFB Employees' Retirement Trust 1, .a4 a *Also f8508290593 Notary!ubiicinandlorlheSlats ashingt �, ACKNOWLLOOULHI INDIVIDUAL 'CS Wing at 1 '• '.. O 0 • f 0 1 • • • • Lots 7-23, Block 36 in C.D. Hillman's Harlington Gardens Addition. to the City of . Seattle Dion No. 1, according tio plat thereof, recorded in Volume 17 ofPlats. page 74, Records of King County, Washington, • 1 1 . i C • O st N_ I CD Q) • 1 A 1 • 1.1e i'• .. . . ., . :.;;;;;;;:vv::. ;A.,.(.4,44,- • '. c- 1 '.. .:,.,..;;;;,::,,A-• 'di-1 • .4 • • if t";ilitu*v4;i• '' ....• j'itzci•-sg4iiikAill4, :c1,;f-1.c.;,.;: :-.;:.:,.., ' N.--• -••• • • ''',- ..-. • .-,'.'.. '''-•• ''' •' ". '' "•-V"r•••Ai.:40,;•2.•,...••• 4"P‘!""163.... O. / . •, • .• ....VI,.' •:5Z—Zr.,1 • r. ....t. ell• ..i. .Vp1,74.te.:•:::‘..,..:t.:".4.-171;...:••7•7.;s:4,••••••.;.:•,,‘..;•.%'{....f.4 VI?' ' 14.; •' e . '- • ';':17711T':‘ftvre';''4.rl11.,-4 —•:' -:!).1 ,-- .4:-.-e.4z1=7-4r&F r"..4'7" .- :-ti.V..'fli*s.,f:c•••.-W.,,• .... -41i•Z•:• .,,',-> • • : • ..• • :::'"•t''1.'''....'s.'••6..-.! ',111;41Mt- '. ,..,..... . '__ ;,,%..... III— '1-`';!:',;''.?:'•'-'12,..ri .:',:).'4':..14.',;'. .'- . •' ' :'..'•-:."'•'.4r',ef.'''.i' ` .•;"?. :.:._,•:• ,ItrA•14-1-•PW,,. , ," - 3i49•: 't;g4-..,. e:s..X.•.. ••:,::••:;4-:i-•-.' '.. .E.PetZd; .-VN-4;4'• Z.-.•.,-.` "`..i.' • '."` .i...--2'.„'-*:4-2.'•,- .,. .......*:':•.?•: e.4?. 4;.'.re,•a .:,;*,1 - '' stk.0*1:' .,:t-);•e 47t• 14.7V. . . • . .. .....r.......4.. ...•. ,04,...,:s - 7 1./AIM."--.. —.. ... :.% 7,t...-..-.7 7.. • ' ••-t;•-•-i. . . _ . • ...7.7 : ..-..; : '1.7 V--•a.D . . . . . ' • 4-.....:.;'.,,••7•;'1.'•1:.-;:I.-;f'•-••.`-•f i•f.V....1 r::,.'.•..••.•.1 a•.tP,. -;7;i:.f,"...,:I•i.••r''.'.''•,;.-:;.....'.'z 1'';I,X 1ig.•i4...i....,_P f.'.Sif.:t;i'.•..".;i, ..=..:N1V2,I:'":• lTM Ctl•4.i''!i'•... :.:.-.:.;•.6..V.-.•';t.A-. 1 ‘ g .. . . wk - 1 -V.-•--•:.i,-..I-'r C4 z•:,.•74t'ik.'fi-:i • " ,; ; " :;ti I % e . i -t % q -i.f•• • 1:!6;-i e'•..•;'1— f•4t•• • ....._:.....-."i.k. ,.;•;:- z. •:411krert::?....•-•.'1.•;-:".1-"Iltt:)•?•-:4.1r.g-..1;t4gPif;'-': •• ••• .' •••• •'•••-••••.:-:.,•*.s.,...P.Z./.4.;••::Vj.i'Ll.....;.t....!......:'-••• • - '.... •.. • '....•. %f.:f.'`..-• • . • . .:.. . . • . ,' :. •,.......,..-4•:..;‘);.•.:.•,1.- i7.. •......2. . • •- • - • t . -,..;..:•_,...:,...,k:•:' ': • -A ''ikr:'-i-'4 i;e:t::..:1,•?::::.....v):••••••: , :• . • •. •.4..........._ - -- 0 t. ..../ v. • I. After Recording Return To; I Re 31 Win . . . • • John H.Dorm • 520 S.W.Withal,Suite 800 1 Portland,OR 97204 i B 1 I QUITCLAIM DEED-STATUTORY FARM I I •The Grantor,SUSAN N.McU30D,of Lake Oswego,Oregon,as a gift.conveys and quitclaims to STUART C. NESS an undivided one-sizth (1/6) interest (including after . • acquired title)as tenant in common in the following described real estate: • Lots 7-23,Block 36,in C.D.Iiiihnaa's&Flingson Gardens i Addition to the City of Seattle,Division No. I.according to plat thereof, recorded in Volume 17 of Plats,pap 74, Records of King County,Washington; situated in the county of King,state of Wahl:woo. . . Dated this 29"day of December, 1992. . CO . CD 16 0 . # (i......../coLittijazoci4,. yi2 Iliftgl-L GO M Susan44_, . 9. Oiltd*Int Deed I .. Susan N.McLeod, Grantor Unto , Stuart C.Ness. • . Grantee Lsamumnammeal E1600309 02/23/90 .00 .00 . , 1 . __ ... ;31'1-N4: '""V4f•Ntrc:',•;-•,...!,-.'S-7.-7.-. IX.Cli--- .V.- ,', ":-_4-. ••-•14'.-II:4..- i60'l• '-•'••Y-S..v.ie4Stelf•-' •.'V 1' - . • . • (" 1 • • _,,&jetgi.1.43,1,_,.....,_..,,Yitilik..... .X.&.:j‘•''' T'• •...N...• Z1W,J..k,ti ...•.-gi':4 . .c'.›i'.. !.....4..0.1.... • • .."..•.•....i'"J•n ..4.:T"'Al - NIT.:'="?'":44-02. ../v,csr,..7.Vi•.. .;' ••.- 4 ei•J•05,,,,, __'ez'''V. -%v:.4.•-iv:A' e.5..f,x.:,.";„,-:14,.--.. •-p.- ,,,,,-46...1,,A. •.,4,444.150'• Fy;•;•••.!.,312. ••...:7.1•••,..•-....41 ' 4,11:.:::ferej.1?• s, ..rjtr4g425it.if.'Ai"- • . '•. :e..';••''• a,. ,• .....jj.k1. 1.':.;.1.••• '-.-pe4eviiitle i. .--...01% ,,,,,44; • • •0. .;.-,i.—..:..,..,:4'4 1". ••••1•7,'•• ••1 Ir f •••.1 • ..... ••• t• ''' ' •'ar,041 • of. • • t.-••••..•-• :..:•:•••":' r'.;7'"A 1".:•':41• 111..;:1.1.%";•7:-..,•V•4$-.‘,_l'.."4•,, :.I 'l Piegpfrglalti.r, • '• ..'"•• •.-Y••"f "::%?..•;;--'':........--leVi:•'frit-4•11::,,k7*;-•17 *P- -. 1'- ----.4.:,-, • . • .. .. • c:-..r•-.,.. .,-•:......::„.•.4rA,-....:-..•-••:•_Awit. 7 :t.-. • - op., ,..•_? . • ••. • • • • - :• • •••••• •••0:-....---;-.,4.14•414,-Pro-541•ie.2.0,0:1niV:tia•strA ' . . Itarc.;,../ • . , . / • • .;•••. . . ..- .r..e.,..... .i..t pr)i...fil•••..46,-r.,4:41•:•-••7,11.a.-ei...t '-..,...:41olik .;V.:::•r• ' • .'• .f..•.i;..•••:......1.:i.:...:?•^...:....*.ifd',;.:....;:.•:.i.r ; t•;,...,,;•;,...:1:7 ...tw• .•• • ' . . . ... .• . . :.., ...... 1 ....4..t.I.r.,:r.1_;........-,..: ••••.1. -. ..-...1. -.• . -.. • • •• '•• •:.••••j ;:''' .0•tr1'..:ci::id••.""••-1.: ='?gret:• ;"••Ns "•• . • t • ... • - . - . • 11t • • .• n• • • • • • • • . • • • i••.•.,:l!!:..x:•?.•./4.4.0"%•••• ... •.•.:, • •,,,: ' • • - . . . , . .. .• .. .. . 1. • • • • •• •• 1 ,• • . • ......--...-.---..--,...--.-........................--,--.....I.. .... ..... ......... .._ .. .- ._—:..........---- r. 0 I () • .6 ..• s. ' . Olt i . l STATE OF OREGON I )as. County of Multnomah . ). _k I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that SUSAN rik McLEOD is the person who appeared befons me,and said person acknowledged that she signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be her free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes MCIWOOCCI in this instrument. , • .L1 . SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this A . ft`,`day of December, 1992. ‘r.)es\ch.",it_ wd ... n n Notary Pu lic for Oregon ..,L'j J.-i, • e My conunission expires: .1 7.2 ick3 •• - . • CD . CO . • V) 0 . In • N S . , 03 . . . • 2 NCONISIN240/10.1.05 _ . • _, ... • . • ..i.••--7.t% ..,..,-a-4 41/4.9...'••-,44-10,..-•-.=.2...:t...1c...1.t.....,,,,V.•::-J" ... ...,kf.-.,,0.;.-.......:s...."4.14...v.....trad..t.t.:,....4.•I•eriAMI•Z•••.“‘•••Ki•r• . • �,` a' , •Yr'• 'irk�: \j:1i.={ •• • • •.• ' ' , ., ......e.-. ..�wvr'nty.. r.•a'MWMVMr.�w•4r.y�� • _ - •. • • . . . • • • • • . - • :.•_.r-ca�+rF---�-'r:4,sr.-xrt�•'r�caav+nFw:-..r�a.......� ..... v_.,..,..-...y„r-,..... .. • i • After Recording.Return To: _ Robin B.Parisi,Esq. Parisi k Parisi t S.W.Columbia.Suite 680 Portland,Oregon 97258 OUITCLAIM DEED KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that SUSAN K. McLEOD. hereinaker called Grantor,whose address is 4/../y s* Lck Dt. fair as a p gift.conveys and quitclaims to STUART C. NESS,hereinafter called Grantee,whose address Nis 4- 1.4 1E103 WA OIKf 1W k/A an undivided one-9 h(116) interest as tenant in common in Inc followiSuwng-described real p situated in King County. M Washington: N Lots 7-23. Block 36, in C. D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle, Division No. 1,according to plat thereof,recorded d in Volume 17 of Plats,page 01 74,Records of King County,Washington. DATED this day of . 1997. Susan K.McLeod STATE OF OI'EE6a Al ) )ss. County of NULTAntrait ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on A VENB ►— lb , 1997, by Susan K.McLeod as her voluntary act and decd. arrtaAr1114. a. l p4. ) • AMpallr11IMOI IOW MLE-OREON Notary blic for Oregon COMAISSON owns MY ear�ressnw WIRES omentl zoos My commission expires: /0-.2 r-Bo E1600590 03/25/98 .00 .00 .- • __• .+..,v.,•-.••♦.•.;.••f•v.+.K.lMlh=7`aM.'!:}71'JF•}�,FyfAs'.4.,.:..?.., .'..n•:..,,-..�..� r::w•+r.+M•'.•.s•�w! . . . • ...• , :...:?...i.....aillaX:e.l.VfillV36,•`•:.P;a4;4•4:5•4•4ii:;•:•-•i;;;A7414! :.•'.•$'41.10, 1,4?.51. • t.'•• ••• . . '••, -: ' fr.1';4•:;:•••••- r.i: •N:"*:![".:":,' "'',; ••. -1!.!•,,, ;1 rffhfi,le.tf:# •.• .* , • .. :..,...4 ;,•. .:.:....0 c;,••+,:•;*,-.•:,1,:,..;-::•w.t.....",..7:;,:i::4,V1 di.it•LV544FgAii . , •• 6 . . • • •. .. •• -• -1 ...• ...0•- .- • 16;,kr' Vt" :14...! . , :• - .4 ..;,..2...... :' '•••• *:?%'"•i-er.'15...-:,••°.5.."•:r:;.'','..• . . -. ' ' -•• '— ' • '. .t ../.. .. :(5•• igi.42.••••••'..;•:-:::; •• . ° . • • • • •'• • ••:••••',•-••• •.• i•r••••••:..Ii•-•;‘ •-••,-.1',..".,..gi.'7:••••••%:1/74,.:.• . ! . • •• • • ••• : . ; •••'"•‘••'...-••1•.... .••-•-•••.-• •••-?.:••°°'..:•:.Zi.:•••:-. . • " . . . .. .. . ° • • . l. •7. • -• • • -• • - . . . . • * . I . • . . . . ..: • . •• .- ' • - • . • . . - • . • ••. I t • . ... ..__ • . . . . .. . (' ! ,••• . ‘. •••• i- • DE t 3 1 Oh . .•ti i After Recording Return To: 1 • John H.Doran 520 S.W.Yamlull,Suite 800 Portland,OR 97204 g I . P. , QUITCLAIM DEED-STATUTORY FORM I • The Orator,SUSAN N.McLEOD.of Lake 43sw ego,Oregon,as a gift,conveys N and quitclaim to STEVEN A. NESS an undivciecl one-with (1/6) interest (including after g • • acquired tide)as tenant in common in the following described real estate: • • Lots 7-23.Block 36,in C D.lalmares Esrlington Gardena i Addition to the City of Seattle,Division No. 1, according to plat thereof.recorded in %lime 17 of Plats, page 74, Records of King County,Washington; rib situated in the county-of King,state of Washington. ID . 0 Dated this Pso T day of December, 1992. • In C44t CO C7 . • 03 . • 0) S..diA,;tAtil--WP)r-I,C2.01 Susan N.McLeod T. • °Wedelns Deed ' • Susan N. McLeod, , • Grantor Unto Steven A.Ness. • Grantee 1CON11174211/41D1U1 21600592 03/25/96 .00 .00 . ... i • N Q 1.: .' • ••- •�.•f v:)1 `4.�t a + %3fig:6} it+� 1± • i!' y,-.�..44,41 • Div C.,iuktet ?J*'` zo r ..• -•.j•...1, ti'•► 1_.M471Yy ,`".•.(t,s+("(',�rr =J.:. •. • . _..'xa.n•r•,�.•r4•,„ • '' .r-taVP j, w•- - ,.:- -•••• :J?•:'I :l• .'. /lYl; • 1 2. rd} 4.°!.; •R•.vas :•rtN 111y,i • 1. _Lit. {:^vit*r; :y�i:::�•.-i.;,. �.i.n;�_ ._. .. _. �� :v♦�L.; • r'tlL�.:`�.K'a1•'34ti'. �:^':••�. .f"• -:..t•__':F.:•it:d3'•:: ' • :b. --'.'•-''•.:'-• • • ••f......“..... .... •••.:•1.:.. ..:-. .----.-.........----... ......::-T. w • • II, 1 __ _ , k ,•• STATE OF OREGON ) I )ss. County of Multnomah ) . I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that SUSANr1•McLEOD is the person who appeared before me,and said person acknowledged that she signed this instrument and acknowledged is to be her free and voluntary act for the urea and purposes mentioned in this instrument. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this A9 G`day of December,1992. . 9 Notary Pub• for Oregon . My co niaaion expires: 3/a 11 t ti • F N • • •� • • • • • • • • I : 4 • • 74.7 :• :./.w5'r' '74Agi �,�►•'i4. MI; • • • • :air.: •.�:•<� '•: • • • • • \ •a.a:• ._ • • • 8 ' a After Recanting,Reno To: Robin B.Parisi.Esq. 8 Parisi is Puist r 1 S.W.Columbia,Suite 680 Portland.Oregon 97258 OUITCLAIM DEED 8 > KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that SUSAN K. McLEOD, hereinafter r V called Grantor,whose address is f// t AOt ?* 3D as a gift,conveys and quitclaims to STEVEN A. MESS,hereinafter called� antoe, whose address is DI S40 SW tp gfRC gal CIA 11.rr4sR an undivided are-eixth(lb) interest as tenant in common in the following-described real property situated in King County, Washington: CID Lots 7-23. Block 36, in C. D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle, Division No. 1,according to plat thereof,recorded in Volume 17 of Plats,page 74.Records of King County,Washington. DATED this day of . 1997. 4 Susan K.McLeodd STATE OF O1L 6Q JJ ) )ss. County of MIALfnjGkAN' ) - This instrument was acknowledged before me on AJOVE,uuSER, /0 , 1997, by Susan K.McLeod as her voluntary act and deed. Odor'tr BOOMMM Mai roRrr11107 AN SUMO DM tncswt tm ' Nooaloanatuatrvraw ilf' ;4t11, Notary blic for Oregon trtrwtt►artatoas v My commission expires: l0--2P-DQ tvasiratdo • -:' Ei600593 03/25/90 .00 .00 • .—• . r . y.. '. . ...i ••ara�1*narl *vtl,7:p.o.any•ir ••_ysn ...r. ,:• :t.r• (p R+ , 0 • • • After Recording.Return To: • Robin B.Parisi.Esq. Parisi&Parisi I S.W.Columbia.Suite 680 Portland.Oregon 97258 X I QUITCLAIM DEED REF#C O'RE INS.W 519,i7—(o l''. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that Larry Lee 1tsrceaux, husband of 0 Grantee hereinafter called Grantor, whose address is 41 Spinosa, Lake Oswego, Oregon C7397035, conveys and quitclaims to SUSAN K. McLEOD, hereinafter called Grantee, whose 23 address is 41 Spinosa, Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035, all of his right, title and interest in the Q: following-described real property situated in King County,Washington: Lots 7-23, Block 36, in C. D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle, Division No. 1,according to plat thereof,recorded in Volume 17 of Plats,page 74,Records of King County, Washington, ExcEPT that portion conveyed to the E Sttated°n Was n �'da#g59. primary State Highway No. ;1 by deed recorded under DATED this—Piday of —ran C. , 1998. f 11'' ,, x tk Soo IA.� i3 Larry L e Marceaux m STATE OF OREGON ) 5 County of J,t.474ttngft,►Z )ss. = This instrument was acknowledged before me on Mkt /S , 1998, j . by L ei_-rj Lee. /fa,r c ea a y as his voluntary act and . 8 u4, fO .=I.• a►truttrtx /Y1e+ t•Ln 0,3 . s xttatasurttt+urn Notaryeublic for Oregon • ' :, .! 1 / COMMSSOPIrro,050211 My commission expires /0-,2 8.0 0 sT inCtMaMONEONS onsetZLZe 0 1 F I5 £3F*FMON'QufICUM DFED.3USAN Ei636687 09/04/98 .00 .00 - ----- ..+w liri. Mir s • • • X A • • After Recording,Return To: Robin B.Parisi,Esq. Parisi&Parisi 1 S.W.Columbia,Suite 680 Ponland,Oregon 97258 CORRECTION CHICAf TITLE INS,_- Cr) OUITCLAIM DEED AEf# 10937 (o CO KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that ARTHUR S. NESS and VIVIAN 7 Q FAYE NESS,husband and wife,hereinafter called Grantor,whose address is 14005 S.E.44th OPlace, Bellevue, Washington 98006, as a gift, conveys and quitclaims to SUSAN K. • McLEOD, hereinafter called Grantee,whose address is 41 Spinoa,Lake Oswego, Oregon,an CI: undivided one-third(1/3)interest as tenant in common in the following-described real property situated in King County,Washington: $ Lots 1-6 and Lots 24-34,Block 36, in C. D.Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle, Division No. 1. according to plat thereof,recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 74, Records of King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH vacated Thomas Avenue S.W. (83rd Avenue S.)'S.)ladjacent thereto; EXCEPT that portion conveyed to the State of Washington for Primary State Highway No. 1,by dcd recorded under Recording Number 5443689,situated in the County of King,State of Washington. *vacated by City of Renton Ordnance Number 3195; MCC EFT the t 40 feet of said DATED this 3r day of I\u GM , 1998. vacated avenue • at Arthur S.Ness, Individally and as Attorney- in-Fact fpr V.vian F Ness Polder of Attorj/da 992 e9 2 8 Vivian Faye Ness by Arth S.Ness as Attorney- in-Fact under Power of Attorney dated June 30, 1992 I c 1 Fi636608 09/04/90 .00• .no 0 um • e •• Aher Recording.Return To: Robin B.Parisi.Esq. Parisi do Parisi I S.W.Columbia.Suite 680 Penland.Oregon 97258 CO CTLON CHICAG TtfLE!RICO. 10 OUITCLAIM DEED AEf# I D99�� CO KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that ART UR S. NESS and VIVIAN FAYE NESS,husband and wife,hereinafter called Grantor,whose address is 14005 S.E.44th OPlace, Bellevue, Washington 98006,,as a gift, conveys and quitclaims to SUSAN K. McLEOD,hereinafter called Grantee, whose address is 41 Spinosa,Lake Oswego, Oregon,an Q; undivided one-third(1/3)interest as tenant in common in the following-described real property situated in King County, Washington: • Lots 1-6 and Lots 24-34,Block 36, in C.D.Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle, Division No. 1, according to plat thereof,recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 74, Records of King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH vacated Thomas Avenue S.W. (83rd Avenue S.)'edjacent thereto; EXCEPT dial portion conveyed to the its State of Washington for Primary State Highway No. 1,by deed recorded under Recording Number 5443689,situated in the County of King,State of Washington. *vacated by 1 City of Renton Ordinance Number 3195; WEPT the east 40 feet of said DATED this 3r day of Flu attar 19999/98 vacated avenue Arthur S. Ness, Thdividally and as Attorney- in-Fact ffppr V4vian Mess ?ler Power of Attorr�Ey/ 992vv $ Vivian Faye Ness by Aith S.Ness as Attorney in-Fact under Power of'Attorney dated June 30, 1992 1 5 El636600 09/04/90 .00 .00 .R' 7• • . .ti._.• .- 6••••• �/y�• ilj • <^ �.�i .,1y - -Yam. O '"• .. f _ e t /, P • s � e STATE OF OREGON ) )ss. County of Washington ) • This instrument was acknowledged..re me on Au ust 3, 1998,by Arthur S. Ness as his voluntary act and deed. Notary Public for• on My commission expires: 7/y�03 OFFtcVLeEM. STATE OF OREGON ) PAMELA1/1NfotaaE ss. ' NOTARY COMMISSIONIta� °0t�41 County of Washington ) MY COMMISSION L7tPtdtESJtlYY,2002 • This instrument was acknowledged before me on AugtLst 3, 1998,by Arthur S. - Ness as Attorney-in-Fact for Vivian Faye Ness unde 'o er of Attorney dated June 30, 1992, as his voluntary act and deed. • Notary Public for Oregon My commission expires: 7/f O. O C OFN O'! COMMISSION ND.314311 tilt COINBSPOU EWES JULY O.MU T. • • • • 2 vasnwsszawinu mcouer nKn®smsti • •+-• -, } •r •� 'r'aRY' �.,ram �.fir- •11i1 _ � +y *us—• .< rep k, ?` o-' . 0 • • • it • • After Recording,Return To: • Robin B.Parisi,Esq. Parisi do Parisi 1 S.W.Columbia,Suite 680 Portland,Oregon 97258 O CORRECTION C♦ICAGO.TTIITLE INS.CO. OR REF#5 3 7-h KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that ARTHUR S. NESS and VIVIAN O✓ FAYE NESS,husband and wife,hereinafter called Grantor,whose address is 14005 S. E.44th 0' Place, Bellevue, Washington 98006, as a gift, conveys and quitclaims to STEVEN A. NESS, hereinafter called Grantee, whose address is 01540 S. W. Corbett Hill Circle, Portland, Oregon,an undivided one-third (1/3) interest as tenant in common in the following-described real property situated in King County,Washington: Lots 1-6 and Lots 24-34,Block 36, in C.D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle, Division No. 1, according to plat thereof, recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 74, Records of King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH vacated Thomas Avenue S.W. (83rd Avenue S.),‘adjacent thereto; EXCEPT that portion conveyed to the State of Washington for Primary State Highway No. 1,by deed recorded under Recording N Number 5443689,situated in the County of King,State of Washington. *vacated by City of Renton Ordinance Nun 3195; the east 40 feet of said vacated avenue TED this �r0 day of 1998. Arthur S. Ness Vivian Faye Ness byArthur S.Ness as Attorney- .; Y Y s in-Fact under Power of Attorney dated June 30, 1992 • F IIanNk3S'W IALWFSS CQIIECf1ON DEED FIEVFN 1 0636690 09/04/98 .00 .00 •. w t: .-+ :;: •-. —11-. K:... 7."; MJt_�.yit,,,,�,,,�.... .;•i'�=„iy r }xr ;,�_„(,.--asss • • STATE OF OREGON ) )ss. County of Washington ) This instrument was acknowledged a me on Au t 3, 1998,by Arthur S. Ness as his voluntary act and deed. • • I s� Notary Public for egon My commission expires:, 179/0 r • • STATE OF OREGON ) PAMELA a E )ss. � j NOTAAYFUNUMOErroN County of Washington ) tyC011109oNE70tRESJULYat 2002 This instrument was acknowledged before me on August 3, 1998.by Arthur S. Ness as Attorney-in-Fact for Vivian Faye Ness under r of Attorney dated June 30, 1992. as his voluntary act and deed. grl 2 Notary Public for Oregon My commission expires: 77/O OFfVAL$EAL r. \' / COMM1SS ON N0.314tt1 MY COMMON owRELurI 2 F.MMN6SiYGBrBALW EILCll7IDN.IZEIL1ii171 `JYyti e' .^+..'.f....v"'._.,+v,•'-� 'l:•^�i Ft T.4•r�,- .c t' .. >:•1irA,Y„t�7r 5a.. "i iM`Y-r.t 1 qc":,k-h°,.,;....._�. ,.-c.'r't�=�' 0 • • • • • • After Recording,Return To: Robin B.Parisi.Esq. Parisi&Parisi I S.W.Columbia,Suite 680 Portland,Oregon 97258 • l CORRECTION CCE AGS11TE INS.CO ` OUITCLAIM DEED tO Q KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that ARTHUR S. NESS and VIVIAN O FAYE NESS, husband and wife,hereinafter called Grantor, whose address is 14005 S.E.44th G Place, Bellevue, Washington 98006, as a gift, conveys and quitclaims to STUART C. NESS, • hereinafter called Grantee, whose address is 4823 Jenks Way East, Sumner, Washington, an • undivided one-third(1/3)interest as tenant in common in the following-described real property situated in King County,Washington: Lots 1-6 and Lots 24-34,Block 36,in C. D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition to the • $ City of Seattle,Division No. 1, according to plat thereof, recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 74, Records of King County, Washington; TOGETHERII WITH vacated Thomas. Avenue S.W. (83rd Avenue S.)"adjacent thereto; EXCEPT that portion conveyed to the State of Washington for Primary State Highway No. 1, by deed recorded under Recording Number 5443689,situated in the County of King,State of Washington.►v ted by City g of Renton Ordinance Number 3195; EXCEPT T the east 40 feet of saidvacated • a l rED this 3'd day of A u bus r 1998, Cale4.4" Arthur S. lest Individually and as Attorney ttosr e�i dacedvian 2 r Paver of lr } g Vivian Faye Ness by Arthur S. ess as Attorney- in-Fact under Power of Attorney dated June 30, . s 1992 $ F‘aunnrsmmu,u.5 ESS rauF.c'noN OEm ZTUAir 1 F56366912 09/04/90 .00 .00 - . ... r..:,..,;;•�'°'!..a'^"'.-P11frc: .».sv sv. is :?+: _ :7 _„ '.-. • ■ ' • is • • STATE OF OREGON ) ss. County of Washington ) • This instrument was•acknowledged be •Qame on August 1998,by Arthur S. Ness as his voluntary act and deed. , Notary Public for Oregon /! My commission expires: 7 7 0 • STATE OF OREGON ) .:_ OFF1CLAL SEAL Ss. •• PAMELA DMf01<LJS fj NOTARY PIJBUCONSION County of Washington ) COMMISSION NO. a311MY 4 2002 This instrument was acknowledged bef e me on August 3, 1998,by Arthur S. Ness as Attorney-in-Fact for Vivian Faye Ness u wcr of Attorney dated June 30, 1992, as his voluntary act and deed. No Public f (13 My commission expires: 7 Vo?' C 01 OFACNLBFx - PAMELA Donau* t�rwte .1a MY COMMISSION WIRES J LY 4,2003 • • F91W/�, /ERALMILCWROCIANDEDATIMIV _ I ,; •., •_:. ,�• 't.kewyM�RIR4.0P.,1oA.NY • .y'kir ti�-i • L� + a �', . s.. ii• F: , • "2i �•Ix 4. 6Cy TFr r ,y ` , riamo__.___ -L. •. iiiiiiiiManin1=1.1. .7 -r lirMEMER 1 _ARMEE . • r 1 ,---r Coro a es bA • • KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:. ;Hlt:P.::6. 6107s0C For good and vatuania consideration. receipt whereof I. hereby arkne vle•dged, the undersigned hereby grants a perpetual easement to Pacific Northwest Mall Telepnone Company. a Washington Corporation, its successors and assigns.with the right to place.construct.operate and maintain. inspect,reconstruct,repair,replace and koep clear underground communisation lines with wires, cables, fixtures and appurtenances attached thereto as the grantee • may from time to time require, upon, across. ovr and/or under the following des.ribed property C° situated in King county,slate of _ Washington •aT Co I-- Lots 17 through 20, Block 36, C. D. HELLMAN'S EARLL:ibTON GARDENS ADDITLON In NUMBER 1, as recorded in Volume 17 of Plats at page 74 and also that O portign of Thomas Avenue Southwest (83rd Avenue South) (Evans Avenue) • OD vacated under Ordinance number 3195, 111 located in the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of Section 24, Township 23 Nocth, Range 4 East, W.M. , Said easement being the southerly fifteen (15) feet of said Lots 17 through 20 and the southerly fifteen (15) feet of the westeray 20 feet of said ,,''jj vacated Thomas Avenue Southwest (83rd AvenueI Southwest) (Evans Avenue). (f�' :;rantee is subject to foiling conditidns of easement. Grantor shall be notified prior to construction of any further utilities with written notice subject ;547r to approval from grantor to place such utilities or repair such utilities. This agreement is for this one installation and any additional underground i' . i • • work must also have and individual right-away easement for each and every. new installation. Grantee shall be responsible for all damage caused to A ' i Grantor by the exercise of the rights 3;� 4 privleges herein granted and shall restore the right-of-way to the condi ion j /I e.ii 113 GC b•.tl.a. Sr4T1SF/gest7Y 7'/2 ?7 4.N CA7b.,e. -All labor, material and other expences that are incurred-by Pacific Northwest f Bell Telephone Co. shall be at their expence. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone pS •Co. shall not charge Russ or Susan Brown or any future owner, now or any time =�=.i • in the future, any fees or costs for the construction of underground communi- cation lines on this property. EV, ;, • rr , All costs shall be born and fully paid for at Pacific Northwest Bell expence. Grantee shalt at all times have the right of full and free ingress to and egress from said property•^r all purposes herein ( mentioned,and to remove at any time,any or all of the underground communication lines and/or wires,cables,fixtures and ap purtenances from the said property,with the understanding that grantee shall be :J',. responsible for all damage caused to grantor by the exercise of the rights and privileges herein granted. r ' ',;•.4 j The rights,conditions and provisions of this easement sh II inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the heirs. 11 '• , + executors.administrators.successors and assigns of the respective parties hereto. ,l� '.I In witness whereof the undersigned has executed this instrument this 3s a( flay of ( -c 4. 0 19 er/ Russ Brown Witness: Y / /..y,1husband . • •,) rNi. '!Lf%irX917-.-r..---..._ //i 4Cfe 1 ' it `.e , 83i05i47 ` .l t RECC F 3.00 fi049E: Di, 1. I r. [ CASHSL ****3.00 ' 22 (Individual Acknowledgement) (Cerporate AcMnowtdgemsnt) ti :' ' STATE OF LG e2.4 N ,e/'� STATE OF ' ;.Vr ,. i t ,=r COUNTY OF 4i ss.J caul::r^r . • • f t 4 .r', On 02.M day personally appeared before me On this._day of 19 's �j } �c�' '.�,re•" before me personally appeared ,'' ,' Y some known to be the individual_described in and who executed .'I• the within and foregoing instrument. and acknowledged that ':::: i, •'S•I ' reo the same as free and to me known to be the +.is :-) _l voiune act and deed. for the uses and purposes therein! wofficialmentioned. • ,s1.- i • Gn urde•my hand and official seal this .' ' ' gay ui the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument.and ! 1 , I , of ,! ' L'� •l �> is .9' acknowledge0 sad instrument In be the bee and voluntary act and •l'', ��-1a'u ti/ ) ,��Cr'lC�+�•�-��! diced Of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein w li* mentioned.and on oath stated that was/were \•r. i; Notary Public in and tpr me•ttate of :t.-% 7 rrz auithont•d to eve-ute said instrument. a"^ a= ` residing at_ 1!�'= 4,r�� J , In witness whereat I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my • • .: 1z9/e,y olheial seal toe day sea year lust above written. /'7 Y/ r p ` C�.7�� j .Y;` = Notary Public in and for the Sluts of DF ` - 14 vo.4290 319 . •O.I. M!A N..7 • —{-41-106! WM. -1,.t rED ACCESS .. . . WARRANTY DEED In the Matter of Primary State Highway No.3., Jct. SSII 110.241 to Jct. • • PSH NO.2 in Renton. ' • X KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That the Grantor . BERTHA ISACSON, a widow ' - a- C• for and in consideration of the sum of -- ($10.00) Ten and NO/100 ------Dollars, - and other valuable consideration • hereby convey s and warrant s to the STATE or WASHINGTON, the following described real estate situated in King County, in the State of Washington, to the . . • ante extent and purpose as if the rights herein granted had been acquired under Eminent Domain statute ' • of the State of Washington: • - . • - - All those portions of Parcels "A", "3" and "C" of tile following described Tract n;:" 17ir. _ ' ,.:.thin a strip of land ' feet in width, being 100 feet on each side of the center line . >r of Primar, State Highway NO.1, Jct. SSI, N0. 2-in to Jct. of PSH 110.2 is Benton: . CT "7": -rarco1 "A": Lots 1 to 12 inclusive in Block 3 ; • , Parcel "'i"t All of Block 36; Parcel "C"t All of Block i4C; - Al' in =.0.'alrl lanis Earl'_n.'t flon Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle, v'_sion 110.1, .. ' • .; •ter :]at recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 74, records of King County; situate in thc t:. of Renton, County of Kin:, State of Wushinrtcn. • :he -ran;,or herein reserves the ri-'ht to remove ihe improvements from the lands herein ,. c.x:•rz..p-t:, assnIn- all l ahllity to persons and/or property connected with said rc:-.::al, • 0'' at ..y tire uttil ..u.ust 15. 1962; however, on said date, all inprovenents.ts yet rena_ninr. • ' • - 7r pr.rta:ll:• t enairi.n, upon said lards shall become the proper t j of the State of :Jashinr.- • tim a::1 all ri-:tts of the grantor to said improronents shall:then cease and tor:.:r.ate.' It _c understood and agreed that the State of :lashineton, its authorizes agents or .i:si•n`, ^ _:•.:t'_: hive thc :a:ht to enter upon the remaining lands of the rrant•.1', her heirs, s::cces:ers - •.. or auai-na, where necessary to accomplish 'L., removal of said i:provements. t :.1 ao, t e Cra:�tor herein conveys and warrants to t,}�e State of :lashin-ton all ri^hts of ,1 • :.: sac and e-ros_' (includi.nr; all existirr, future for potential easements of access, L•-.t ,-ew and air) to, and bet::cen :o�•! Pr'rtary State iji•+,hway NO.1, Jct. a:i: ::O.?-:•: to lot. • • • 7'. :.:.2 in :'enton and the remainder of said Tract "In. 1 _ - ... :Iris bein,_, ca.rreyed herein contain an area of-11Ci,7 C sou.-ire feat, more or less, the • . srec_aic uet:ailr cotce:rinr all of :which are to be found within that certain nap of r,�a_cj_ .n1 on file in the of:ice of the Birecvar of Hir•hwrys at 01:•mpia, anc beariA- date of an:— ro:a] /;l/�1 and revised ::arch 6, 17,62 and the center 1'ne of ':hick is also shown of re• );.1 in look 2 of Rizhway Plato, races 135 and 186,1 rc cords of said County. • `YN 1.11\TIIII • 1•IK\TIHI 1•V I`I,:. • . —'?, -. ..' •- }" •�" •et Parcel # 17N11 • - . • ;� y� . / .;. L II p_'.' •/airy • Iv•1 • 1 . ',•,^•,T.1,11. IN).M•.111. G t. ea , I . .. - . ✓ . I - • • • riri 11111, --... . . . .. .• • ....•• , • . •••• • • • -ss . . . .. ! ".:. . . • . " • I, ..i st—.-' ' vdt4290 Fori320.1.. • ' • - .. •. . • • • ' - . • . __ . , It is understood and agreed that the delivery of this`deed ii hereby tendered and that the terms. . . ... and obligations hereof shall not become binding upon the State of Washington unless and until accepted - :ind approved hereon in writing for the Mit*of Washington, Department of Highways, by the'Chief - cy) Right of Way Agent. • . . . . . • Cr , • . • • te Datid this_.. 234. __day of--)kra-1262 • •'- • . . el% , .• . in . i • . • Accepted and apjyroved_C__f_.(...J...f.b.....4f*- ---- ' . -ST• - oF Wi.,,SHING'TON • . FAR". or HICEIWAY3 •. . By. • -dr..........eze- -, e:ftee ! ' .., Chief Rightt of Way Agen7 . • ... . • STATE OF WASHINGTON, . . . I SS. . . . County of.. • .r1Pil. ......... . • , I,the undersigned,a notary public in and for the State of Washington,hereby certify that on this • 215t ... .day of.. HlO's 1962 . !.. .. .... . ...-.. . . _. ...._perpnally appeared before me .. . ...........:. .,: Bertha Iaaacaon .. • .... . . . . .. .. •—, • . .. .._.:...:....'.•4 ' .-. . • . .. .. - .... . . . .. ' ' • " ' • . r.o'slyi knounili.te _.the individual. described in and who irecuted the foregoing instrument, and • • t -••• acknowles*Ahat._the . signed and sealelId the savrAas--ber • free and voluntary act and deed, . . .. .. • , :,.. •,• for the:Lie,and purposes therein mentioned. • • • . .• .- ; •• • dims under*my hand and official seal the day and year last bove 'tten. . . • a. . •-eeK. .• ...' . . . . Noboru Public in sod S9 the Mat WAsAkliloA. . . . .. .. • / . . , Residing al. Seiattle . . • • , . . • . ...., --; . % . • . . --_- •: - . •.:-•. • ; . . • • . . ' . .. . 't" • . • • .. ' • :..... " • ' • -• • • . -----4.. . . ... -. . - cb . .._ .-1 ... : . . . 1 i , C\. , 1 as . (4 1 . * •I I g ?)S. 1 si G-4 5 . • . 2 g _..... ... . co. .4.. ;. .,5 • • ..—:. r74 CO . RECORDED .4 . 11' •g- 2.PI n , , c.. .. f=1• Z VCLL .-a• f .: ; El • PAGE ' —RECI.EST CF .. lillil: ii .;o149'. ,1 .41“. - • . cil •. 1 • gga t 2 q.ix : .__ ___. e a 19f:7 .P.N 22 PM 12 25 • . i T p, N • •itt c:4 i pc . . ,..;. . -f- ' ••• .,727. 2 0 ES ...,, g 1 . 1 ...,•:: ::.:,.:N; b' . . . e •04 , a• .. ' . ... 4 • .. -4-• • • • . •.ta, • A. ••N .1. I : . :.!.: ...• ' • • SECTION 24, T. 23 N., R. 4 E., W.M. g 0 - -- — — R.O.W. �_ • • • R.O.W. 1130.0.T. P.O.T.STA.1011ee.0 li-=1 i 8 SR 405 (P.S.H. No. 1) __ �_-��'-T 9cAla, r_a IIAD.O.T.S.T.STA.147+22.4 wl118808.411 �l NdZ�• aT�•�- �� ■a■.■ �_� •-1-•7 i jai• I 1 atom tfOAll -r _ -- -1-.-1- • 12 1 1 01• 1 of I S RAT WOMAN r r•-r 14 . ] 1 1 d I 1�d ' me Agee WINDY YAP -� _q•-re i 1 5 I - i I I ; :; i• 3 af iei,-inn • �-Rr•.O;y'1. J3 ��-I.. 111 IIC . 1 I • I I• 1 1 • -i�- a, 20! GAL DESCRIPTION 13 1 W' 1 1.tlf 1 1--• 1 1 --��• tab 1 1 1-_.1-- •20 40 1 I I TIIOtIDED Or FIRST AMCUCAN 1111E • PARCEL'A' (ktJ.w S.Him) 1 i 1 I I L-•L-• 34 I _ 1 .I s I lob 1-0.d Lola 24-34.Oodt 38 It C. H`rtat'e Lwl t91en Arcked �,,.:. 1 w I 1I 1 1 1 • .....--1'.-' I Addtko le the CDy l Seattle IRIil Na I.occw tg le the plot 1 t I 1 I -t.- I > •1 thereof.rerdd le Volume 17 e1 Rota�■�+74.Newel e1 Idyl I a 1 -'t- I < I I i ew.tt)♦ tNa Taanta NM weebd lA�w Avenue Seoth..et I. b I-- r•-_•_-•-33__.__._ I co I (UM,... events Slothslots OOS310allount thereto' OfODT n Lwl 40 led So Orel. 1 1-- 14 �._-.__.-_.__.__._ J��) ro I wooled 4y the Olt el Iteetr traumas Hower 31S1t OMIT the( 13I.'. -- 3J3 I I ii, 4 1 i 5„I 1 �a4bn twyd he tw Slide d Wslt4NIio 1■r NYnay stele t11g,■ey N BLOCK IA r• > I Q o 1 Ma 1.►y deed rerdel mar Mnba SM360/.dWdd • ,,,,yy ''.'a B PARCEL' 32 _ I i ` i 1 In the County al Ices stets lRv.eta. 1JVL.. -- -- -- - �_� -- -- - -- 1 in 3 1 BLOCK 37 ! z _I Lets 2Y3.Me 11 r cD ))r.w'.w�awo adding Addition u lee, 3 '1 Q> 15-PARCEL I J1 --I W I I I1 DRs.rs ets.,DM+.4.wI,-■eraw t.-lh.-pl.t-mael.row.ded O-- 0 51• U Q I _.__.__•-_•__._ • 1 I I Yakima 17 e1 Fle*yea 74.R.erde i1 1D l C.00ty.114410.214l4way• BLOCK ri .--•--•-.-•-- _•_ 1 > i •1 C I Darr I d woo dammed to Ike Stele l l la ter li1.J4 ! 1� I I a I w um I I Stele I•�••y Na I.by deed r.rdd under o.erdne NI.Nr G. I ir 0l 1M1 evict eluded M II.Cewty el lay,Sts4 d MIeeAYytAI. 10.•-• -. r._1_.,-.,--1-•TyT'T-•r-•r-•r-•--i 5Q to I ma.Oecugi, .I i I • i 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 1 I q' i e M 11>K NW. l 40 IrI I Porde A Y maIMANi w Arm el 124.e77 So Il.(tot arm.). 1 g 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 II eob1p(ts.n..rl. .r el reerd liltreyC.rty R.ordtie Ne. 1 I 1 1 I I I !1 I I I 1 1 1 6{.3.Mendlay lyNe T71ble0701.i0 17 1 le 1 19 1 20 1 21 1 22 1 23 1 24 1 25 12D 1 27 1 29 1 20 I ° 11z W 1 I 1 1 1 I I I I ...._.__......_.....- iii eld ttoC IOL N GS dt4t (FOURTH AVE.J M L_r. l an or rot.HOP axer -R v r�SW t6th STREET eteot• - _ v N0f1e'Se•E(MT CALM) BASS KAIIew R • _• •R-'--'--•--•--•--13ia1e'(RAT CALL) ,33L01(V�_._-•--•--•--•-� -•--•1 r- — IR to ISY 1 1 na cote rot N cmte • I 40 1204 OW O NDt1Or I10 710 • I SItRYFY PRfIrSITURES AND FOUIPYENT nos wawa(1r11m1,oev ro■aan to A 9803I09CO3 • "orm i ..I�. 1MO Ila WW1 Id=a CI®e as LEGEND .mumMtge.011101•MI . • a yr lice.v cm ra late I ao/5q. • p /a��./w Phi.17aS AUDIT0111 ICATE -... • 01 RAt fMd br lord Ode.-My l 1e..el.�..Y.. d/e1 eel=bo woman • le Mesh—et vU1Rr9 et Peon—et As Mom*el 111000 I.SC1N00I5 ------ RECORD OF SURVEY • ausyslrora tali mc►Ts ••--• Nds .rrtt.dy re rewr a euney node by ow r .A FOR:STEVE E V E NESS.S S. "� Sry�of R.eaa of Ut my dy am d..MI el 6 tab epdrertt.lts THE FAR COMPANY = 01102011 .84 lam. SECT. 2.4. , ,TIP. 21. N., R. .+..E. W.U. l the Sway R.oadby eel el w mama el � O' II[e,Se ...1011G COUNTY, WASHINGTON OM OW FM e9 Te WOOL A.550NUS ILL t Y .se—• RE11Tt714 e006e e. I . (NICJ 2SS-2SL _Lego TOIL 1y OATS IY09 1�IESSiW.D1M6 ®�!R 90.1E �y • DI MOa L.SO0Im01 GerlWete Na 1021e _ re g- 1• TIJ I•.e0 1 1 Of I _ •lifi• I 1 **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Receipt **************************************** *********************** Receipt Number: R9906343 Amount: 1, 501.98 12/22/99 10 :40 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #5662 RADOVICH Init: JEJ Project #: LUA99-186 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Location: APPROXIMATELY 900 SW 16TH STREET Total Fees: 1, 501.98 This Payment 1, 501.98 Total ALL Pmts: 1, 501.98 Balance: . 00 ****************************************4*********************** Account Code Description Amount 000 .345 . 81 . 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 000 .345 . 81. 00 . 0017 Site Plan Approval 1, 000 . 00 000 . 05 .519 .90 .42 . 1 Postage 1.98 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON DEC 2 4 1999 RECEIVED ���►\ 114/ sttsI�1-41 �1 Geotechnical Engineers,Geologists&Environmental Scientists • t � t 4� t.�' c)[�II�'t!,,i ii l�✓+7 rites-�.I . December 8, 1999 f; - • E-8648-1 • DEI/ELOPh PENT-p John C. Radovich Development Company �17Y® RENTONmiNG 2000 - 124th Avenue Northeast, B-103 Bellevue, Washington 98005 °EC2 2 1999 Attention: Rebecca Davidson RECEIVED) Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Study Update South 1-405 Place Renton, Washington Reference: Earth Consultants, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering Study E-8648, March 16, 19 9 • Dear Rebecca: • In accordance with your request, we updated the referenced geotechnical engineering study for the currently proposed development. We understand the current development plan is for a three-story office building with one level of parking under the building. The specifics of the building design had not been finalized at the time of this letter. The proposed-,:floor elevatidns for the parking level are 16.8 to 17.8 feet. The location of the proposed building has changed from our referenced report and we do not have deep explorations under the building. However based on our review, it is our opinion the recommendations in the report are applicable for the proposed office building. Pile lengths may vary slightly from those anticipated in our referenced study. The maximum column loads for the proposed building are on the order of 426 kips. Based on the column loading, we anticipate augercast piles will be used to support the foundations. The allowable capacities for 18-inch diameter augercast piles embedded at least ten feet into the bearing layer are provided in the referenced report. If increased capacities are needed, we should be contacted to provide additional recommendations. 1805-136th Place N.E.,Suite 201,Bellevue,Washington 98005 Belle(iue(425)643-3780 FAX(425)746-0860 Toll Free(888)739-6670 - John C. Radovich Development Company, E-8648-1 December 8, 1999 Page 2 The opportunity to be of service to you is appreciated. If you or your consultants have any questions, or need additional information, please call. Very truly yours, EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC. ea,. Kristina M. Weller, P.E. Project Engineer , GA*i - it7 1,41 t Kyle R. Campbell, P. 767 Manager of Geotechni, •" = '' ,?° I Zi KMW/KRC/bkm EMUS (CWO0 L. Earth Consultants, Inc. "0 A A • . PII , . . • . . , . • . . • • GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY . . • PROPOSED • CANDLEWOOD HOTEL . • SOUTHWEST 16TH STREET . • RENTON, WASHINGTON ' • • • • E-8648 . March 16, 1999 • • PREPARED FOR • • BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. • Kristina M. Ellings , P.E. Staff Engineer Ft. CAMp �y" 'WAS',,�o �o• Fz < I, 0 ibryzior.4 Kyle R. Campbel - ' .4,,5Its) 3(i1(i i Manager of Geotechnic: • , ii, • afr . LEXPtRES III 18100 J • Earth Consultants, Inc. 1805 - 136th Place Northeast, Suite 201 Bellevue, Washington 98005 (206) 643-3780 • Toll Free 1-888-739-6670 . / • / `` IMPORTANT INFORMATION I ABOUT YOUR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT More construction problems are caused by site subsur- technical engineers who then render an opinion about face conditions than any other factor. As troublesome as overall subsurface conditions:their likely reaction to subsurface problems can be. their frequency and extent proposed construction activity.and appropriate founda- have been lessened considerably in recent years.due in tion design. Even under optimal circumstances actual large measure to programs and publications of ASFE/ conditions may differ from those inferred to exist. The Associatioh of Engineering Firms Practicing in because no geotechnical engineer, no matter how the Geosciences. qualified, and no subsurface exploratioaprogram. no matter how comprehensive,can reveal what is hidden by The following suggestions and observations are offered earth, rock and time. The actual interface between mate- to help you reduce the geotechnical-related delays. rials may be far more gradual or abrupt than a report cost-overruns and other costly headaches that can indicates. Actual conditions in areas not sampled may occur during a construction project. differ from predictions. Nothing can be done to prevent the unanticipated, but steps can be taken to help minimize their • A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING impact. For this reason, most experienced owners retain their geotechnical consultants through the construction stage. to iden- REPORT IS BASED ON A UNIQUE SET tify variances,conduct additional tests which may be OF PROJECT-SPECIFIC FACTORS needed, and to recommend solutions to problems encountered on site. A geotechnical engineering report is based on a subsur- face exploration plan designed to incorporate a unique SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS set of project-specific factors.These typically include: the general nature of the structure involved, its size and CAN CHANGE configuration; the location of the structure on the site Subsurface conditions may be modified by constantly- and its orientation; physical concomitants such as changing natural forces. Because a geotechnical engi- access roads. parking lots, and underground utilities, veering report is based on conditions which existed at and the level of additional risk which the dient assumed the time of subsurface exploration,construction decisions by virtue of limitations imposed upon the exploratory program. To help avoid costly problems.consult the should not be based on a geotechnical engineering report whose geotechnical engineer to determine how any factors adequacy may have been affected by time. Speak with the geo- which technical consultant to learn if additional tests are which change subsequent to the date of the report may advisable before construction starts. affect its recommendations. Construction operations at or adjacent to the site and Unless your consulting geotechnical engineer indicates natural events such as floods. earthquakes or ground- otherwise. your geotechnical engineering report should not water fluctuations may also affect subsurface conditions be used: and, thus, the continuing adequacy of a geotechnical •When the nature of the proposed structure is report. The geotechnical engineer should be kept changed. for example. if an office building will be i apprised of any such events. and should be consulted to erected instead of a parking garage.or if a refriger- ! determine if additional tests are necessary. ated warehouse will be built instead of an unre- frigerated one: •when the size or configuration of the proposed GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES ARE structure is altered; PERFORMED FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES •when the location or orientation of the proposed AND PERSONS structure is modified: •when there is a change of ownership.or Geotechnical engineers' reports are prepared to meet • for application to an adjacent site. the specific needs of specific individuals. A report pre- Geotechnical engineers cannot accept responsibility for problems pared for a consulting civil engineer may not be ade- which may develop if they are not consulted after factors consid- quate for a construction contractor,or even some other ered in their report's development have changed. consulting civil engineer. Unless indicated otherwise. this report was prepared expressly for the client involved and expressly for purposes indicated by the dient.Use MOST GEOTECHNICAL "FINDINGS" by any other persons for any purpose.or by the dient ARE PROFESSIONAL ESTIMATES for a different purpose, may result in problems. No indi- vidual other than the client should apply this report for its Site exploration identifies actual subsurface conditions intended purpose without first conferring with the geotechnical •only at those points where samples are taken, when engineer. No person should apply this report for any purpose . they are taken. Data derived through sampling and sub- other than that originally contemplated without first conferring sequent laboratory testing are extrapolated by geo- with the geotechnical engineer. ; 1 Z ` i I /' i1) 4i\ Earth Consultants Inc. I'' u klii) a) Genorchnkal Engineers.G olnuls►s&Em lronnwn►"l Scientists March 16, 1999 E-8648 Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 18215 — 72"d Avenue South Kent, Washington 98032 Attention: Dan Balmelli Dear Mr. Balmelli: We are pleased to submit our report titled "Geotechnical Engineering Study, Proposed Candlewood Hotel, Southwest 16t Street, Ren on, Washington." This report presents the results of our field exploration, selective laboratory tests, and engineering analyses. The purpose and scope of our study was outlined in our February 10, 1999 proposal. Based on the results of our study, it is our opinion the proposed development is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint. In our opinion, the proposed building may be supported by driven timber piles obtaining end bearing support in the dense to very dense sand and gravel or on augercast piles embedded into the dense to very dense sand and gravel provided the recommendations contained within this report are incorporated into the final design and construction specifications. We appreciate this opportunity to have been of service to you. If you have any questions, or . if we can be of further assistance, please call. Respectfully submitted, EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC. 4444 S' Kyle R. Campbell, P. E. Manager of Geotechnical Services KMBKRC\bkm 4l TABLE OF C NTENTS E-8648 PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 General 1 Project Description 1 SITE CONDITIONS 1 Surface 1 Subsurface Groundwater 2 Laboratory Testing 2 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3 General 3 Site Preparation and General Earthwork 3 foundations 4 Timber Piles 5 Augercast Piles 5 Settlement and Horizontal Loads 6 Slab-on-Grade Floors 6 Seismic Design Considerations 6 • Excavations and Slopes 7 Site Drainage 8 Utility Support and Backfill 8 Pavement Areas 8 LIMITATIONS 9 Additional Services 10 APPENDICES • Appendix A Field Exploration • Appendix B Laboratory Te t Results ILLUSTRATIONS Plate 1 Vicinity Map Plate 2 Boring and Test Pit Location Plan Plate 3 Utility Trench Backfill Plate Al Legend Plates A2 through A9 Boring Logs Plates A10 through A18 Test Pit Logs Plates B1 and B2 Grain Size Analyses Earth Consultants, Inc. of GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY PROPOSED CANDLEWOOD HOTEL SOUTHWEST 16T" STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON E-8648 • INTRODUCTION • geniKal This report presents the results of the geotechnical engineering study completed by Earth Consultants, Inc. (ECI) for the proposed Candlewood Hotel located on the north side of Southwest 16t Street in Renton, Washington. The general location of the site is shown on the Vicinity Map, Plate 1 . The purpose of this study was to explore the subsurface conditions at the site, obtain pertinent geotechnical engineering data and based on this information, to develop geotechnical recommendations for the proatfon and our exploratory locations od site dvelopment. At the time were our study was performed, the proposed building Io approximately as shown on the Boring and Test Pit Location Plan, Plate 2. Project Description It is our understanding the proposed development will consist of a four-story hotel with associated parking. Based on the site plan provide , the parking area floor elevation of 21 .2ll be raised two to feet, which is four four feet. The proposed building will have a finished to six feet higher than existing grades. ' If any of the above design criteria are incorrect or change, we should be consulted too a vi foew m the recommendations contained in this report. In any case, ECI should be retainedp a general review of the final design. SITE CONDITIONS Surface The subject site is located on the north side of Southwest 16`t' Street in Renton, Washington ab (see Plate 1, Vicinity Map). The property is thteastuwest directionX Theisigte isobounded on ut 320 feet in the north-south direction and 410 feet in the the east and west by commercial developments, on the south by Southwest 16`h Street and on the north by Interstate 405. The site is vegetated with deciduous trees up to two feet in diameter and a few blackberries. Thick blackberries exist on the west side of the site. The site is relatively flat with less than four feet of elevation change across the site. The site is three to six feet lower than Southwest 16t Street. A small wetland exists on the northwest corner of the site. e__.�P......ikwnto. Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY E-8648 Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Page 2 March 16, 1999 • Subsurface Our explorations consisted of drilling four borings and excavating eight test pits at the ap- proximate locations shown on Plate 2. Please re er to the Boring and Test Pit encountered atoeachllocation ates A2 through A18, for a more detailed description of the conditions explored. A description of the field exploration ubsurfacmethods e condition included s encountered Appendix A. The following is a generalized description of the s The subsurface conditions encountered in our borings and test pits consist of four to ten feet of loose silt and sandy silt (Unified Classification ML) underlain by loose to medium dense silty . sand (SM) and poorly-graded sand with silt (SP-SM). Dense to very dense poorly graded sand with silt and gravel (SP-SM) to poorly graded gravel with sand and silt (GP-GM) was encountered at approximately twenty feet below the existing ground surface and extended the full depth of our explorations. Groundwater Groundwater was encountered during drilling fat six to twelve (12) feet below the ground surface. Groundwater seepage was encountered in our test pits from four and one half to eight feet below grade. • The groundwater level is not static, therefore one may expect fluctuations in the level depending on the season, amount of rainfall, surface water runoff, and other factors. Generally, the water level is higher and seepage rate is greater in the wetter winter months (typically October through May). Laboratory Testing Laboratory tests were conducted on several representative soil samples to verify or modify the field soil classification and to evaluate the general physical properties and engineering characteristics of the soil encountered. Visual field classifications were supplemented by grain size analyses on representative soil samples. Moisture content tests were performed on all samples. The results of laboratory tests performed on specific samples are provided either at the appropriate sample depth on the individual boring logs or on a separate data sheet contained in Appendix B. It is important to note that these test results may not accurately represent the overall in-situ soil conditions. Our geotechnical recommendations are based on our interpretation of these test results and their use in guiding our engineering judgement. ECI cannot be responsible for the interpretation of these data by others. In accordance with our Standard Fee Schedule and General Conditions, the soil samples for this project will be discarded after a period of fifteen days following completion of this report unless we are otherwise directed in writing. i # GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY • Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. E-8648 March 16, 1999 Page 3 DISCUSSION AND IV COMMENDATIONS General Based on the results of our study, it is our opinion that the proposed development can be constructed generally as planned provided the recommendations contained In this report are Incorporated into the final design. The critical geotechnical aspects of the planned development are primarily associated with foundation support of the building footings and slabs-on-grade. In our opinion, the proposed structure should be supported on pile foundations obtaining support in the dense to very dense sand and gravel that underlies the site at about twenty feet beneath the existing grades. Recommendations for pile Installation and load capacities are presented in the Foundations section of this report. The pile design has taken into consideration th downdrag forces caused by placing fill in the building area. Placing the fill early and allowing most of the settlement to be realized can reduce these downdrag forces. The fill will have to be in place at least one month to have any effect. Allowance should be made in initial grading to allow for settlement of the fill to be realized. We recommend overbuilding the pad by about six inches to account for the settlement that will result from the weight of the fill. The fill settlement should be monitored by placing several hubs on the fill surface and measuring the settlement. This report has been prepared for specific application to this project only and in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area for the exclusive use of Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. and their representatives. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. This report, in its entirety, should be included in the project contract documents for the information of the contractor. Site Preparation and General Earthwork Based on proposed site grades, the building p d will be filled four to six feet. This fill should be placed as early in the construction schedule as possible to allow the fill to settle prior to installing the piles. The fill will also provide a stable working surface for pile installation. The building and pavement areas should be stripped and cleared of trees, organic matter and other deleterious material. Existing utility pipes to be abandoned should be plugged or removed so that they do not provide a conduit for water and cause soil saturation and stability problems. Based on the thickness of the topsoil layer, enTountered at our test pit locations, we estimate a stripping depth of less than two inches. Many areas on the site will not require stripping after removal of the trees. Stripped materials should not be mixed with materials to be used as structural fill. Earth Consultants. Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. E-8648 March 16, 1999 Page 4 • Following the stripping, the ground surface w ere structural fill, foundations, or slabs are to be placed should be observed by a representative of ECI. Proofrolling:may be necessary in order to identify soft or unstable areas. Proofrolling should be performed under the observation of a representative of ECI. Soil in loose or soft areas, if recompacted and still yielding, should be overexcavated and replaced with structural fill to a depth that will provide a stable base beneath the general structural fill. The optional use of a geotextile fabric placed directly on the overexcavated surface may hel to bridge unstable areas. Structural fill is defined as compacted fill placed under buildings, roadways, slabs, pavements, _ or other load-bearing areas. Structural fill and r floor slabs and footings should be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding twelve (12) inches in loose thickness and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of its laboratory maximum dry density determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1557-78 (Modified Froctor). The fill materials should be placed at or near the optimum moisture content. Fill under pavements and walks should also be placed in horizontal lifts and compacted to 90 percent of maximum density except for the top twelve • (12) inches which should be compacted to 95 percent of maximum density. The soils encountered during the site exploration are moisture sensitive due to their high fines content. As such, in an exposed condition they may become disturbed from normal ' construction activity especially when in a wet or saturated condition. Once disturbed, in a wet condition, they will be unsuitable for sup ort of foundations or pavements. Therefore, • during construction where these soils are exposed and will support new structures, care must be exercised not to disturb their condition. If disturbed conditions develop, the affected soils must be removed and replaced with structural fill. The depth of removal will be dependent • on the level of disturbance developed during c nstruction. • Structural fill which is to be placed in wet wea her should consist of a granular material with a maximum size of three inches and no more than five percent fines passing the No. 200 sieve, based on the minus 3/4-inch fraction. During dry weather, most compactible non- organic soil can be used as structural fill. It is r commended that structural fill planned for on site use be submitted for approval prior to imp rt. Foundations In our opinion, the proposed hotel should be su ported on driven piles obtaining their support by end bearing in the dense to very dense sand and gravel or on augercast piles embedded into the dense to very dense sand and gravel, We estimate pile lengths of approximately twenty (20) to thirty (30) feet will be required to obtain adequate embedment in the sand and gravel deposit. Due to the placement of abodit four to six feet of fill for the building pad, downdrag forces of ten tons have been taken into account for the allowable pile capacity. Earth Consultants. Inc. - 1 1' J GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. E-8648 March 16, 1999 Page 5 Timber Piles . For the driven timber piles, in order to obtain a better estimate of the required pile lengths and driving characteristics, a series of test piles should be driven prior to ordering the production piles. The piles and hammer used should b4 the same as the type to be used for the installation of the production piles. A representative from our office should observe installation of both the test piles and productiol piles. Driven timber piles should consist of treated CI ss B timber piles. The piles should be driven into the dense to very dense layer of sand a d gravel. The piles should conform to the specifications outlined in the Uniform Buildin Code Standard 25-12 for friction and end bearing piles. Timber piles should have a minimum tip diameter of seven inches and a maximum taper of one inch in ten feet. For pil s driven to refusal, a maximum axial design . capacity of twenty-five (25) tons may be used. The timber piles will derive support by end bearing in the sand and gravel. An uplift capa , ity of four (4) tons may be used for a single pile penetrating into the sand and gravel. No re uction in pile capacity is necessary if the piles Iare installed with a minimum center to center pacing of three pile diameters. The timber piles should be driven to refusal wi h a hammer having a rated energy of fifteen thousand (15,000) foot pounds. Refusal is de fined as thirty-five (35) blows per foot for a twenty-five (25) ton pile. This pile capacity ha been reduced to allow for downdrag forces caused by the placement of structural fill in t e area of the building. The piles should be marked in one-foot increments, with lengths painted on every five feet to facilitate the recording of blow counts during driving. The ti s and butts of all piles should be banded with • two bands at each location to reduce the potential of pile damage during driving. • Augercast Piles • For 18-inch diameter augercast piles embedded at least 10 feet in the bearing layer, an allowable axial capacity of fifty (50) tons may a used. The allowable capacity includes the reduction for downdrag forces. The allowable pile capacity can be increased be additional penetration into the bearing stratum or by increasing the pile diameter. For resistance to uplift, an allowable capacity of twenty (20) tons can be used. No reduction in pile capacity is necessary if the piles are installed with a minimum center to center spacing of three pile diameters. As it is not possible to observe the completed pile below the ground surface, judgement and experience must be used as a basis for determining the acceptability of the pile. Therefore, a representative of ECI should observe the pile i stallation on a full time basis. This will allow us to fully evaluate the contractor's operation, collect and interpret the Installation data and to verify bearing stratum elevations. Furthermore, we will be able to assess the implications of variations from normal procedures with resp ct to the design criteria. Earth Consuhants. Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. E-8648 March 16, 1999 Page 6 • Settlement and Horizontal Loads. Total settlement of single piles is estimated to b- on the order of one-half inch. Most of this settlement should occur during the construction phase of the project as the dead loads are applied. The remaining settlements would dev lop after construction as the live loads are applied. Horizontal loads can be resisted by the pilings, friction between the base of the pile caps and grade beams and the supporting soil, and by passive soil pressure acting on the face of the buried portion of the pile caps and grade beams. A lateral pile capacity of 2 kips may be used for both pile types. This lateral load capacity assumes a deflection of one-quarter Inch at the pile cap, and may be increased by one-third fo- short-term wind and seismic loading. For frictional capacity, a coefficient of 0.40 can be used. For passive earth pressure, the available resistance can be computed using an equivalent fluid pressure of three hundred (300) pcf provided the pile caps and grade beams are poured "neat" against the competent fill soils or backfilled with structural fill. These lateral resist nce values are allowable values, a factor-of- safety of 1.5 has been included. ' As moveme t of the foundation element is required to mobilize full passive resistance, the passive rest tance should be neglected if such movement is not acceptable. Slab-on-Grade Floors We anticipate the floor slabs will be supported by the pile foundation system. The slabs could be supported directly on the structural fill placed in'the building pad. However, we anticipate approximately one inch of differential settleme t could occur between the slab and the pile supported portion of the structure after construction. Concrete slabs resting on soil ultimately cause the moisture content of the underlying soils to rise. This results from continued capillary rise and the ending of normal evapotranspiration. As concrete is permeable, moisture will eventually penetrate the slab resulting in a condition • commonly known as a "wet slab" and poor adhesion of floor coverings. Therefore, the slab should be provided with a minimum of four inches of free-draining sand or gravel. In areas where slab moisture is undesirable, a vapor barrier such as a 6-mil plastic membrane may be placed beneath the slab. Two inches of damp sand may be placed over the membrane for protection during construction and to aid in curing of the concrete. Seismic Desian Considerations The Puget Lowland is classified as Seismic Zone 3 by the Uniform Building Code (UBC). The largest earthquakes in the Puget Lowland are widespread and have been subcrustal events, ranging in depth from thirty (30) to fifty-five (55) miles. Such deep events have exhibited no surface faulting. . Earth Consult nta. Inc. ' GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY E-8648 Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Page 7 March 16, 1999 Structures are subject to damage from earthqu.kes due to direct and indirect action. Direct action is represented by shaking. Indirect action is represented by foundation soil failures and is typified by ground failure or liquefaction. Liquefaction is a phenomenon in which soils lo1e all shear strength for short periods of time during an earthquake. Groundshaking of sufficient duration results in the loss of grain to grain contact and rapid increase in pore water pressure, causing the soil to behave as a fluid. To have a potential for liquefaction, a soil must be cohesionless with a grain size distribution of a specified range (generally sands and silt); it must be loose to medium dense; it must be below the groundwater table; and it must be subject to sufficient magnitude and duration of groundshaking. The effects of liquefaction may be large total and/or differential settlement for structures founded in the liquefying soils. It is our opinion the potential for liquefaction over the site during a seismic event is moderate to low. The effect of liquefaction on the planned development o t is anticipated to be minimal as the structure will be supported on a pile fo nd system. In accordance with Table 16-J of the 1997 UB , soil type SE, Soft Soil Profile, should be used ' In design. Excavations and Slopes The following information is provided sole y as a service to our client. Under no circumstances should this information be interpreted to mean that ECI Is assuming responsibility for construction site safety or th contractor's activities; such responsibility is not being implied and should not be inferred. In no case should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local, state and Federal safety regulations. Based on the infor T ation obtained from our field exploration and laboratory testing, the site soils expected to be encountered in excavations would be classified as Type C by OSHA, and as such, temporary cuts greater than four feet in height should be sloped at an inclination no steeper than 1 ;5F1:1 V. If slopes of this Inclination, or flatter, cannot be constructed, temporary shoring may be necessary. Thissort gw ill helpmen n protect against slope or excavation collapse, and will provideprotection the excavation. If temporary shoring is required, we will be available to provide shoring design criteria, if requested. Although no permanent slopes are anticipated, permanent cut and fill slopes should be inclined no steeper than 2H:1 V. Cut slopes should be observed by ECI during excavation to verify that conditions are as anticipated. Supplementary/ recommendations can then be developed, if needed, to improve stability, including shoulduncontrolledtop • subsurface drains. In any case, water not be allowed to flow over the of any slopes. Firth Consultants, Inc. 1 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. E-8648 March 16, 1999 • Page 8 All permanently exposed slopes should be seed-d with an appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve stability of the s rficial layer of soil. Site Drainage The site must be graded such that surface wat r is directed off the site. Water must not be allowed to stand in areas where buildings, slabs or pavements are to be constructed. During construction, loose surfaces should be sealed at night by compacting the surface to reduce the potential for moisture infiltration into the soils. Final site grades must allow for drainage away from the building foundations. The ground should be sloped at a gradient of 3 percent for a distance of at least ten feet away from the buildings, except in paved areas, which can be sloped at a gradient of 2 percent. Utility Support and Backfill Based on the soil conditions encountered, the site soils should generally provide adequate support for utilities. However, the loose condition of some of the soils and the potential for a relatively high groundwater table may result in de-stabilizing of the trench bottom as the trench is excavated. Where loose soils or h-avy groundwater seepage Is encountered, remedial measures such as overexcavating soft soils or tamping quarry spells into the trench bottom may be required. Caving of trench walls should be anticipated where the trenches encounter groundwater. Dewatering may also be necessary. Utility trench backfill is a primary concern in reducing the potential for settlement along utility alignments, particularly in pavement areas. It is important that each section of utility line be adequately supported in the bedding material. The material should be hand tamped to ensure support is provided around the pipe haunche . Fill should be carefully placed and hand • tamped to about twelve inches above the cro n of the pipe before any heavy compaction equipment is brought into use. The remainder )f the trench backfill should be placed in lifts having a loose thickness of less than twelve inches. A typical trench backfill section and compaction requirements for load supporting and non-load supporting areas is presented on Plate 3. Pavement Areas The adequacy of site pavements is related in part to the condition of the underlying subgrade. The subgrade should be treated and prepared as described in the Site Preparation and General Earthwork section of this report. This means at least the top twelve (12) inches of the subgrade should be compacted to 95 percent of the maximum dry density (per ASTM D-1557-78). It is possible that some localized areas of soft, wet or unstable subgrade may still exist after this process. Therefore, a grea er thickness of structural fill or crushed rock may be needed to stabilize these localized are s. Earth Consu i ants. Inc. ' GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. E-8648 March 16, 1999 Page 9 The following pavement section for lightly-loaded areas can be used: • Two inches of asphalt concrete (AC) ov•r four inches of crushed rock base (CRB) material, or • Two inches of AC over three inches of asphalt treated base (ATB) material. Heavier truck-traffic areas will require thicker sections depending upon site usage, pavement life and site traffic. As a general rule, the following sections can be considered for heavy traffic areas: • • Three Inches of AC over six inches of CR , or • Three inches of AC over four and one-hal inches of ATB. Pavement section options utilizing cement-treated subgrade can be provided upon request. Asphalt concrete (AC), asphalt treated base (A B), and crushed rock base (CRB) materials should conform to WSDOT specifications. All r ck base should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the ASTM D-1557-78 laboratory tes standard. LIMITATIONS • Our recommendations and conclusions are bas d on the site materials observed, selective laboratory testing and engineering analyses, the esign information provided to us by the you, and our experience and engineering judgement. The conclusions and recommendations are ' professional opinions derived in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession c U rrently practicing under similar conditions in this area. No warranty is expressed or implied.• The recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the borings. Soil and groundwater conditions betwe n borings may vary from those encountered. The nature and extent of variations between our exploratory locations may not become evident until construction. If variations do appe.r, ECI should be requested to reevaluate the recommendations of this report and to modify •r verify them in writing prior to proceeding with the construction. Earth Consult•nt•. Inc. • GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. E-8648 March 16, 1999 Page 10 Additional Services • As the engineer of record, ECI should be retained to perform a general review of the final design and specifications to verify that the earthwork and foundation recommendations have been properly interpreted and implemented in the design and in the construction specifications. ECI should also be retained to provide geotechnical services during construction. This is to observe compliance with the design conceptsr specifications or recommendations and to facilitate design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. We do not accept responsibility for the performance of the foundation or earthwork unless we are retained to review the construction drawings and specifications, and to provide construction observation and testing services. • • • • • Earth Consult. ta. Ina. f. . S . ' I ---, ._-..._.. 'INS.._.__ ...� � -1; `y !_ `1_^ fain _ t ▪ : ; ..S`r iti,'1ii�AO 1 i ''..I' .l ^ 51i_'J:rce: ;43 rvl yd3/yy i. i.^;, . r 1 A-'- :v • si I.V / ' 1/ • i -• .4P' fi"i 7 t t;bon r > rt. 18. ;mar , ,n1 1 t listen-4 4 • *.•jiti , •It ! ilyt ;:•b•• :`0.4•1 f�iG11-ai-}!A,irKIi.•:1•_ 1 of `.i S t_ 2ND 'S I,i• :i .// .:y4 ga.M��,_ . • i .;' .i ,,t..,. �BSI`�!a �`,J�T�,. 11:1 VI I .^j • �' • • •'s! rif �'1,ih11,1 �! ■r .- _S 3RD ST �' . .��1., 16�t -.. , ..� son• sN Slf ., .... ....-4; TH r3 :'•1▪ -Z:lf • •14----tx:1 •st,,,\--. if--•p• i_32::r..1--1 ,_ ;if „1.,,,/... ,/ i'.:,..•. A: k k.. a 142 I N't? i I ▪ l/ ,.•• .t▪ i• ,, ,Iy;�••ww I .1 y I 4\ iL[ ay F • si a s ▪ ]i. 1 I f� •'"'�,`;► \• AL 1� . Ci um y :.I elf gf i - . a x.`'ter ! i '" \ 1.amIr s.1;_,•-,1,*1 36 , . i�'��c t, i kIII •e v.\h ,4 A '�j i .yam il, �...1I t ir 3 a -- ` �, C • Ctrs• . { a.9. I. i31rimya v� " :•fir! �..• I ,. < • • 4.4 o arci G .. 515 1 .- oal cr jiiiatt "! �,• 5 I. rrw�t • 1; 1 •.. / INe '. • .• + WUin j•:• p1 _ .1- y.`►:: is ....4*f:?',•�'`i� Y 1 1 a ram..�•1 :fa ' +�145 + , 'Tur{;' .�a f •'111.1• • — Iffi n ��. ''i:.':;It ". ' >►' .,'':r•';2O?;'•:. •!- i•� ' ':`I • SITE E • ° "° • :':1 „l t wg '^ 31QTM3Ti� 4. s • ..•b '• : lei;,.\ S L ::.,•.:,;:: I • ,} _ i F i I.:** .sr1 y •i • 7 ''•• ';;. _ w *y;.,•r:'..t- :• :i•:/.•.. .I r • •� r. .•-•. •.� r �t IBC 4y • • 11lI ••.'..!I••••r..:..•'.`•;..;.!.'q.•.- .. <'••' , r v ..•',•... 'JI:-i•n..•,x...' Y. •' • • "•41.y' ••'• ;•t i.•f5.1`':^•, 1 'S4N• :sA . 1 A• ..-,1: F.•:..g1 3 r ' .•�e v..• ' •AN.N.',..I,.,i.;,-..•.i:..••:••,:•,.•.-1..i'a..sJ. 2.1 :: t3 ST:':.• •1''•L310• -t ' ^1i:'r ,•. ,'1.. .:, • • . , 4.91 vi, • • 'Fr s 11115;•°. I `ztttt st ati3 t '•:. ::r :'F,`.; r ,1 • tam R f'; • ( J'; ..'I Ilkis 1 It • 044.r 1!' 17j. �:! 1 . 1, r ' '• • •,• �+.•. 'r}..' J: - 13 Gt ltin': r""111 "r '' r` 1... I.•c'0�! f VI 29TU ST. •,' 4-, r' c�-n ..: ,,,:ii-� • I �. 1. ... lxf y" j i3Qfl I. . . • .,„ fi � ::-A.-]13T ST' T ? ' �w -. ._. _ . _ p'rim no ' • I w:{: 1 S Re: - w'�'t a+ Is: _c NI..f r:11. sl St nil SII li__ L: 1r _ I Wit. a ii - -►'L •I , , _ f:,i, " SHIN 31 $ hi 3e_ . Irit6_U Sr 4: u 'I 1 Y' i .0 I 1:13:' •'t. a A �jTTtr • .. I /�. ' �♦� {�'► H 1Y all .T ! • yi Reference: • I.'°';, i')' 'ii1 ` King County/Map 656 �� • $16;(�`'��`:,I I aE�arthectiniCal tt3Consultant,s, Incensal .By Thomas Brothers Mapsr Mil Dated 1999 —N Vicinity Map Candlewood Hotel Renton, Washington • NOTE: This plate contains areas of color. ECI • cannot be responsible for any subsequent Din• GLS Date Mar. '99 Pro . No. 8648 - misinterpretation of the Information resulting Checked KME Date 3/18/99 Plate 1 from black &white reproductions of this plate. THOMAS AVENUE S.W. (VACATED) 1 Tresh EnL�oe,Ke 1 T.— P-1 • I 1 B-2-_- B-1!— . ._, H l • , . -1_ O - B-3i ID I w wO t 1 O TP-461.0 • a. J ■IIIIt. t • ao w • 0 —.- W TP-6 I (Y . 1 TP-2 -�- LB-4 • Ai• r - .. • I TP-7 .l (n ,�`. • 1 TP-3 .� —sl— :1 . NM, `.1 � • TP-51 . —a— si:mmno wa« .. 1 r r---1 1 .. -a •v -a 1 • 1 —a— o o .D o f • I Proposed TP.41 m - ® a w n- I Detention Pond o o c 0 o • Ec Qc Q j 1 0 0 01 I LEGEND PACIFIC AVE. S.W. (VACATED) Approximate Scale mommos ss.�. B-1-4— Approximate Location of 0 30 60 120ft. ECI Boring, Proj. No. /0: 0. /Il► , E-8648, Mar. 1999 41 a, Earth Consultants, Inc. i • wo,(1111`iF i Oea,echnlcal Enatneers.°cabals*&Emkonmensal Sclen,*,s TP-1—=— Approximate Location of I ECI Test Pit, Proj. No. E-8648, Mar. 1999 Boring and Test Pit Location Plan Candlewood Hotel Proposed Building Renton, Washington NOTE: This plate contains area of color. ECI � cannot be responsible for any subsequent Df4n. GLS Date Mar. '99 Proj. No. 8648 misinterpretation of the information resulting from black& white reproductions of this plate. C4cked KME Date 3/18/99 Plate 2 Non-Load Supporting Floor Slab or • Areas Roadway Areas I 4 1I' 'I r•r4.:.T ::%��,..,t�•• •t vj•r..• - t p4G vllt Y+• a r rii2;{7.2:is i': n:4�Yt�; t T}'1•,�r.�•�• ;1f 3.i1r' a telt1t{l :;::•tti.41%;1 4:(4l:Wtt4 0 0 0•c •• ® Varies ive drit`w.4•:•'t•!;1`i 'Alii`r•v 0 - • 95 0 0•O f rat a:;•%•• +; 7 2� 9,.. • t•.1' .•r.. SS '.At• :•i+� :1•} .t' .Jt i'NJrft•.J�,=(•t1,=•=•' S'`� }tYi'_:`i. :f:: .}. .0:147E^-✓. ! ' 1%��•r'i`'�a7; .:'i.�taCM17�:l h,`.+� '3t. :l:y .Vtr ;.'!,<�r"3}:�? i.:,•apt-e .i:+;tt. 0A1it.r}� :i��'i ::R •- .:�,• .,•trt.: 1 Foot Minimum i:4'i.e.g:-...4Yx'ii� t t �r1.Gi!.ii•�':pl'�Jj1+.31,4 95 l.} 'giArr ii. 1. r'a?r �, fit:..•a}i:tir.rt.4..:...to+.stjt s{i'r'.+^r3'S..'�+' !3:;i;_;; • ;iK�; l•°i4yt„•••r:6 %;:.• 4.►,y:y{37 t .;1:.,e:rr!$.r'z•Art.r. �3;r1•i�+�f'�ni�`ry:i7°A}:L�'�+11�Fj�tt�etl=i.;iffe{�C4�tuj:{�i�.i�ieifiq:�i}'.V•i=�{:r: • Backfill 7%Yti•r.KIY.7 3'ti<9�. A.:- ei J �;1. (`•A."ti••:•r:' v+ v.: . ri,tr•fr' .1.4:4*.0- ��01 N,�r`n' 4w13,47,•pip '.{�;ti$t r.�'.tf4i: C•w'Tr `r, }�:t•Li�::•.:, ,it;?or t rF�:et.is it• r:.. d*.ro r•'r•if�!'t �•,�•aa'r-E;:l!gC %Tt: .y. 'V•a;':itk:rr,stY,r (i�i.t.lht:Is ry '•• j r{Y. rrr,it:: 7 t}.Syir,{. i:44.•:1;itir •ti t' :M' •s..t•V4l .t..r. li,:il. .S:J r.l:tl.: f'r:tf: :,.•.tdra;1 •3 t.E•�n`ki.i41;:::±i:••.'yt+•Z,:le,::::*:..^ iritSP.y;'l:!:'ir0%. tip: Varies lw,t}r .�� r�rtt•fy�,'b 1•.!�.5+.. .R;;yN�•�.r''#,�i.J:/,:8�2 =�': .i. :f •Tfizi rMi•%2.•tig•rr.•Y. ',' rtt4-.i+ili a +: 1.•t:.tt r,.i"R`ih:i� rri '+ .Yti:ltgs;"?'_:,/ . ti'r''$0;.. :..e.f?„.41•.:iii.3.:rr�`•40 ifi t,Z.-.�•4:ikr.glairia. +r..Y.a,,,': � !+,. il�,,,r ,:i .l:a1,i`+r .9J ,y� L w.. i�i4YATIO�4, t %i s, { 4+i}ttir..4-TTcr,'i'+1;:.. :ttl,�,r,•.:''�`r~r4i.,`1Fi;. :;.„4;1;:. �h.:'31i rt.i 11.ik���•�;��5]• �O t�•s.._ q{iFjt fri+• 3r: S > 'etc tiy r,,.: {Y'y r;i tit to:L'titi r' .."?.4' :3 y', lt•M.:lit: :F r.t� thy.}ti• •I: tt .:l 7 ip ?...1..f r:rrzt r," !.1�.4:jt f.J:lti•I:AV4:5 {�J}-:.�sr!"...:•Gy tra•M •.fVt,•a7 �f�r i"tr'::•irr"}' lr,.i+ +. ;:>•S:j:r: `..t.(�„<r•:�'Y rrsalS�rt:. r: • r k:' 4-. rr4q..•yt1. ." :r•:ti. •.:l:rt i�. T A o. • �;; PIPE• ''e'':v..Q. ` •a b'•'a• Bedding " Q'-Va d .•.. C Varies .A -o• •O:o: •''O 0.0.0 o:•°�p0•;.•°•.P•Q•• Q., ari °•QO•�Q0nGIrio°O'v:d•_0!o'O•o•- "_ LEGEND: "'?,„' ~., Asphalt or Concrete Pav ment or Concrete Floor Slab • t. o • •. Base Material or Base R ck typ.,..:•4.,•,:;;,..4,7..:1:+• r.: Backfill; Compacted On- ite Soil or Imported Select Fill � ' Fr; 1? Material as Described in the Site Preparation of the General ' '�'Y"'`'"4x``' Earthwork Section of the Attached Report Text. Minimum Percentage of Maximum Laboratory Dry Density as 95 Determined by ASTM Test Method D 1557-78 (Modified Proctor), • Unless Otherwise Speciled In the Attached Report Text. •, •° , Bedding Material; Material Type Depends on Type of Pipe and •*A.b o p Laying Conditions. Bedding Should Conform to the Manufacturers Recommendations for the Type of Pipe Selected. • t pv- (' If II v ,i�I • TYPICAL UTILITY TRENCH FILL .,l �, Earth Consultants Inc. Candlewood Hotel 1�11'khfi�ltr{1 Grosechnlerd F.rtaticers.C.4°'°4bl°'F.r,.ironment.lSornik+' Renton, Washington _. ••_ OM 10 I n...... r`1 Q Latta P.Aar •QQ 'f Checked KME 1 Date 3/18/99 I Plate 3 , . APPEN IX A FIELD EXP ORATION E-8648 Our field exploration was performed on March 1 and 2, 1999. Subsurface conditions at the site were explored, by drilling four borings to a aximum depth of thirty-nine (39) feet below the existing grade and excavating eight test its to a maximum depth of twelve (12) feet below grade. The borings were drilled by As ociated Drilling, Inc., subcontracted to ECI, using 'a truck mounted drill rig. The test pit were excavated by Five Ball Construction, subcontracted to ECI, using a track mounted excavator. Approximate boring and test pit locations wer determined by pacing from site boundaries. The boring and test pit locations should be con idered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. These approximate locations are shown on the Boring and Test Pit Location Plan, Plate 2. The field exploration was continuously monitored by an engineer from our firm who classified the soils encountered, maintaine 1 a log of each boring, obtained representative samples, measured groundwater levels, and o served pertinent site features. All samples were visually classified in accordan e with the Unified Soil Classification System, which is presented on Plate Al, Legend. Logs of the borings are presented on Plates A2 through A9. In each boring, Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) were performed at s lected intervals in general accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1586. The split sp on samples were driven with a one hundred forty (140) pound hammer freely falling thirty 130) inches. The number of blows required to drive the last twelve (12) inches of penetration, are called the "N-value". This value helps to characterize the site soils and Is used in our engineering analyses. Test Pit Logs are presented on Plates A 10 thr ugh A19. The consistency of the soil shown • on the logs was estimated based on the effort required to excavate the soil, the stability of the trench walls, and other factors. Representative. soil samples were placed in clo ed containers and returned to our laboratory for further examination and testing. The final logs represent our interpretations of the field logs and the results of the laboratory examination and tests of field samples. The strati- ' fication lines on the logs represent the appr'ximate boundaries between soil types. In actuality, the transitions may be more gradual MAJOR DIVISIONS GRAPH ^LETTER TYPICAL DESCRIPTION SYMBOL SYMBOL Gravel Q C3 . GW gW Well-Graded Gravels,Gravel-Sand Mixtures.Little Or No Fines And Clean Gravels n n n , Gravelly (little or no fines) r M 4 dp Poorly-Graded Gravels.Gravel- Coarse Soils I • (I • I • I gp Sand Mixtures,Little Or No Fines Grained _ Soils More Than I GM Silly Gravels,Gravel-Sand- 50% Coarse Gravels With gm Slit Mixlurea Fraction Fines(appreciable —•• Retained On amount of fines! GC Clayey Gravels,Gravel-Sand- No. 4 Sieve it I gc Clay Mixtures Sand . '•• ••� •'• W Well-Graded Sands, OravMly And Clean Sand o • • o e SW Sands. Little Or No Fines Sandy (little or no lines) 4 z.%• a t •SP Poorly-Graded Sands. Gravelly More Than Soils .>+1:>:?3 ,�a': ,,¢ •.o,.; ••r •. Sp Sands, Little Or No Fines 50% Material :�,:�ti.t:"•.c,:.ty• Larger Than More Than ` No. :00 Sieve 50% Coarse Sands With < SM Sm Silty Sands,Sand-Sill Mixtures Fraction Fines(appreciable . :.. Passing No.4 amount of lines) ''•:'+'``•r � 5C Sieve '"••••'•,.4.•.L' .< SC Clayey Sands, Sand-Clay Mixtures III ML ml Clayey InorganicFine SiltsSands:Cl ti Very aFineyey Sands, Sillsw/RockSlight FlotPlastici.rSilty- ty Fine Silts Liquid Limit /iy / E (- Inorganic Clays 01 Low To Medium Plasticity. Grained And Leas Than 50 CI Gravelly Clays, Sandy Clays, Silty Clays. Loan Soils Clays lit IOrganic Silts And Organic II! I I I I OI Silty Clays 01 Low Plasticity U-1H Inorganic Silts,Micaceous Or Diatomaceous Fky More Than mh Sand Or Silty Soils 50% Material saw Liquid Limit y. Smaller Than And Greater Than 50 l.H Inorganic Clays Of High No.200 Sieve Clays Ch Plasticity, Fat Clays Size / /i pH Organic Clays Of Medium lb High Oh Plasticity, Organic Silts elgi�t�� ��rT Peat, Humus, Swamp Soils Highly Organic Soils Li ..tr, �t/, �(r pt With High Organic Contents • Topsoil 4, y y Humus And Dull Layer �•�•••••••• ti Y• Fill HI hl Variable Constituents ������������ • The discussion In the text of this,report Is nece for a proper understanding of the nature • of the material present In the attached logs. • DUAL SYMBOLS ere used to Indicate borderline soil classification. C TORVANE READING,tsf I 2'O.D. SPUT SPOON SAMPLER qu PENETROMETER READING,tsf W MOISTURE.%dry weight II 24'I.D. RING OR SHELBY TUBE SAMPLER P SAMPLER PUSHED • SAMPLE NOT RECOVERED i WATER OBSERVATION WELL pcf DRY DENSITY,lbs.per cubic ft. LL LIQUID UMIT,% 2 DEPTH OF ENCOUNTERED GROUNDWATER P1 PLASTIC INDEX DURING EXCAVATION Z SUBSEQUENT GROUNDWATER LEVEL W/DATE • /14C., ai` Earth Consultants Inc. t I LEGEND ,1 ! (ka+arIrOwl Wiwi n._t a•_ 04/.a If _._•x_.-_e_ •nn Inl-.•.. Al 3 Boring Log Proled Name: Sheet of • Candlewood Hotel 2 2 Job No. . Logged by: Start Date: ' Completion Date: Boring No.: 8648 KME 3/1/99 3/1/99 B-1 Drilling Contactor: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Holocene I HSA SPT Ground Surface Elevation:' •Note Completion: ❑Monitoring Well ❑ Pieaometer ® Abandoned,sealed with bentonite rd u U 2 claws E General WP43. $ o ,L E E N E Notes (%) 'Ft. ce7 m o n g rn .JIU.[JU SM -grades with gravel •° SP-SM Gray p4orly graded SAND with silt and gravel,very dense, • "•a 21 waterbearing 10.2 . a: . 50 "4;'* >:.a: • 24 • ..it.. 25 ' 26 -5%fan-s • a::•:a iE•ii.. 27 . 28 Ri:O 29 • 30 ••- • ,- • 31 • •:a • 0 32 . ,: . . a • 8.8 ' so :, -increasing silt content - 34 •O. •`a 35r . '0 i O •• 38o • . I..-41 ° 37• 18.e •, a Boring terminated at 39.0 feet below e,dsting grade.Groundwater 59 , • 38 table encountered at 12.0 feet during drilling. $ 39 n M ,rn•. ill till, Boring Log ,i �/ Earth Consultants Inc. Candlewood Hotel u ' O i N 10,Nit r J) coonYnkrol'Acm's%G: tyn i FTvlrt�wwr�+l HctrnMn .j Renton,Washington Prot No. 8648 t7wn. GLS Date Mar.'99 Checked KME I Date 3/12/99 I Plate A3 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of boring Log Project Name: Sheet of Candlewood Hotel 1 2 Job No. Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No.: 8648 KME 3/1/99 3/1/99 B-2 Drilling Contactor. Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Holocene HSA SPT • Ground Surface Elevation: •Hole Completion: ❑Monitoring Wei ❑ Plezometer ® Abandoned,sealed with bentonite General W o. u $ E n y - Surface Conditions: Notes • ��j • Blows E Ft. 5 a, L u ce a E ,: m i • ML Brown SILT, very loose,wet 2 44.4 4 3 4 - 5 • • 37.0 a -grades to reddish brown and gray sandy silt 3 9 to SM Gray silty SAND, medium dense,waterbearing 11 12 31.4 22 •• 13 - • 14 15 18 • • 17 15.3 18 19 O (I). .,ly,.• Boring Log 1 �0 • c`�� 1 Earth Consultants Inc. Candlewood Hotel 8 \lir),\ f:, `(1 r/� Grarechnkal Pneneiss.Cailntbn i EnNrtxunrrnN tickaurtus e o Washington J ' Renton, g Proj.No. 8648 I Own. GLS Date Mar.'99 Checked KME Date 3/12/99 • I Plate A4 Subsurface concttions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,mociifled by engineering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other limes and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of 1 s Boring Log . Project Name: Sheet of Candlewood Hotel 2 2 Job No. Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No.: • 8648 KME • 3/1/99 _ 3/1/99 B-2 Drilling Contactor: Drilling Method Sampling Method Holocene HSA SPT Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: ❑Monitoring Well CIPiezometer ® Abandoned,sealed with bentonite Notes BNows g E .ai•u''.General w E 8 E Ft. (9 N o a > vi SP-SM Grayppo c r1 gravel,very '��� watrbearin graded SAND with silt anddense, • .21 - g .: n ,. t i ,•; : .;Q 23 :a 24 — a. 1 ' •.•%' . 25 ii t, 26 "yA • 27 - 11.4 s`. •V. 28 ' :iss 30 — i 31 GP-GM Grades to poorly graded GRAVEL with silt and sand,very dense, waterbearing . • I . 1 .1 32 12.5 50/6" �' 33 T . 1 1 . .r►1 . •. r. 34 — �1 �1 D • M 35 . •. r, •1 �1 , I • l 36 •1 •• 37 • g 17.5 �6" �i ... ; 38T I ' I Boring terminated at 38.5 feet below existing grade.Groundwater table encountered at 10.0 feet during drilling. g $ .n''-, �» inp Boring Log p ����d ��������'� Earth Consultants Inc. Candlewood Hotel O . , MI Crcati.dnk-al r'rein atf.CwroInsbM•FnNmnme nil Scle.nilary Renton, Washington 1 Proj.No. 8648 I Dwn. GLS Date Mar.'99 Checked KME I Date 3/12/99 1 Plate A5 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of Information presented on this boa. ' •'Eioring Log Projed Name: I Sheet Of Candlewood Hotel', 1 2 _ Job No. Logged by: Start Data: Completion Date: Boring No.: 8648 KME 3/2/99 3/2/99 B-3 _ Drilling Contactor: I Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Holocene HSA SPT Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: ❑Monitoring Well ❑ Plezometer ® Abandoned,sealed with bentonite _ W No. " .11. N $ Surface nations: General Notes Blows & E Z. itsb H E _. t ) Ft. ° vu o H ML Brown SILT, very loose,wet, 1 2 ML Brown and gray sandy SILT, very loose,wet 37.2 I 3 '3 4 SM Gray silty SAND, very loose,wet • 5 - 8 V. 7 38.5 8 2 ' 9 10 1 11 12 • 40.5 11 13 14 -- -grades with gravel 15 - • 18 II 17 GP-GM Gray poorly graded GRAVEL with silt and sand, medium dense, (.N . watefbe ring 11.9 ' VI , 18 1 19 , se , g I libsai e o ,riv. Eiv .rite, • Boring Log ., �� Earth Consultants Inc. Candlewood Hotel . 8 wrj,(iw� -,rll) CaniecinnindAnQnt:vas.Cw:d>oIsAFnNmtInrW wtkitTnn Renton,Washington I iProf.No. 8648 i own. GLS Data Mar. '99 checked KME I Data 3/12/99 I Plata A6 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and itsprnen.t.:they are not necessarily representative of other times and locationS.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of ' ' Boring Log Project Name: i Sheet of Candlewood Hotel 2 2 Job No. Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No.: 8648 KME 3/2/99 3/2/99 B-3 Drilling Contactor. Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Holocene HSA SPT Ground Surface Elevation: 1 Hole Completion: ❑Monitoring Well ❑ Piezometer ® Abandoned,sealed with bentonite General W Blows E E 0 X E N E Notes (%) Ft. c7 v'i o o > m 1.116.1 GP-GM Gray poorly graded GRAVEL with silt and sand,very dense, . '. 1 wate eanng •. 21 �I I 13.7 . I r II I • �' b . . 2 • . 1 ( 24. — •I �I 25 — • ► let ... 7.),,4 28 . I GP Grades to poorly graded GRAVEL with sand,very dense, I .s 1 waterbearing •••. z7 • 8.9 . I . i . 67 •, 28 -3% fines . 1 . 30 I 11111 1 •1• 31 b Illb N :.: 32 - . 1 . 10.7 MvsI 73 ;.. 33 . 1 . I VS ' 34 0; • . 1 . Mes • 35 ;•;. 1 . 36 ;• 1;• 37 vs 149 Boring terminated at 39.0 feet below existing grade.Groundwater ea �I• 38 table encountered at 6.0 feet during drilling. 5 1 w 39 0 Q w P,._ $t►: 44V I Boring Log 8 \� ,1 0 Earth Consultants Inc. Candlewood Hotel Ii I\I ip'tt ril CrAwnctutlail M Grolostits IL PnvIronmenral tictemrtsr.4 Renton,Washington V 1 Prof.No. 8848 own. GLS • Date Mar.'99 Checked KME Date 3/12/99 [ Plate Al Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and I tion of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and Iudgrnent. They are rot necessarily representative of other times and locatlorjs.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or Interpretation by others of 4 . . Boring Log Projed Name: Sheet of Candlewood Hotel 2 2 Job No. Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No.: . 8648 KME 3/2/99 3/2/99 B-4 Drilling Contactor•. Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Holocene HSA SPT Ground Surface Elevation: •Hole Completion: i ❑Monitoring Well El Plezometer ® Abandoned,sealed with bentonite . General W No. o N Notes 96 Blows is E 0 E N E ,- j ) Ft. a N a M 3 07 ': `;; SP-SM Gray poorly graded SAND with silt,dense,waterbearing • 21 — ;-.A Q • 22 • 20.4 s;a •.Q• . 23 ;s a• 24 --• 1 25 - • Q : . ' % -grades with gravel >a 2s •i 0: I 4:iit 27 10.3 + •'• Q n .. 52- ; ' 28 -grades to very dense • • ` : . 29 . ; ::4 30 — ;,:: 31 • GP-GM GradesIto poorly graded GRAVEL with silt and sand,very dense, I ��1►. waterbeanng • 1 •. •, 32 123 • •I•I • • seal 33 — 81 •• ., •1•i =It• 34 �1 �1 35 _ b r 1 . I . 1 . QW • •' .37 1 $ 11.2 5W8" :I.N. J Boring terminated at 38.5 feet below existing grade.Groundwater table encountered at 7.0 feet during drilling. ,a,. ol. .,1t\, Boring Log the, e? Earth Consultants Inc. Candlewood Hotel 8 \my), \IVY Ni,r!/ GeA a•'NealPngthrmaMCrdcpt+n•MNImomoralScrrnK•fn Renton,Washington —"It-.8648 I Dwn. GLS I Date Mar.'99 Checked KME Date 3/12/99 Plate A9 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and iudornent. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or Interpretation by others of ' • ,, .. Test Pit Log 1 Project Name: , Sheet of Candlewood Hotel. 1 1 Job No. Logged by: te: Test Pit No.: _ 8648 KME �3/1/99 TP-2 Excavation Contactor. Ground Surface Elevation: 5-Ball Notes: • W $ it6 co 2 Surface Conditions:General It E T Notes (%) 0 rn O it EL n N ML Brown SILT, very loose,wet 2 3 - 45.a 4 -grades to reddish brown and gray sandy silt • a 7 - • a BM Gray silty SitfkiD loose,waterbearing, caved to surface — Test pit terminated at 9.0 feet below existing grade.Groundwater table encountered at 8.0 feet during excavation. • i i • 1 5 • 6 is W 1 ,v►'- ail •t Test Pit Log ,�( „OM Earth Consultants Inc. Candlewood Hotel O' ' l?1- \iv',\i1r/I odor',nom:rm.G.:wog:Aia FAN mnmennY:klrnrtvS Renton,Washington 0 Proj.No. 8648 ,Dan. GLS Date Mar. '99 Checked KME l Date 3/12/99 Plate Al 1 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locatl¢ns.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or Interpretation by others of 4 , , • ti • Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of Candlewood Hotel ' • 1 1 Job No. Logged by: D4e: Test Pit No.: 8848 KME 3/1/99 TP-3 Excavation Contactor. I Ground Surface Elevation: 5-Ball 1 Notes: • . GeneralW a w a v Surface Conditions: Notes (96) • . 0 "' pEp D N N N ML Brown SILT, ry loose,wet 1 34.2 2 • -grades to reddish brown and gray sandy silt 4 5 e 7 3i • e - SP-SM Reddish brown poorly graded SAND with sift and gravel,medium 14.8 '44 .. dense,waterbearing •::ra 1 10 Test pit terminated at 10.0 feet below existing grade.Groundwater table encountered at 7.0 feet during excavation. • • • 0 d w ,,,. �i • ,,,��, Test Pit Log i` +,( �i iI Earth Consultants Inc. Candlewood Hotel 8 writ `�1���tt?ll '�yon Fn Grolosbisti&EnN'an�'loyal x Renton,Washington J 0 Proi.Ho. 8848 Own. GLS Date Mar. '99 Checked KME 1 Date 3/12/99 I- Plate Al2 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and lo$Catlon of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and B Aliment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or Interpretation by others of • I; , . Test Pit Log Protect Name: Sheet of Candlewood Hotel 1 1 Job No. ' Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 8848 KME 3/1/99 TP-4 E*avation Contactor. Ground Surface Elevation: 5-Ball Notes • — Surface Conditions: General () E • n 8u. EE E • Notes 5 y m • ML Brown SILT,lery loose,wet 2 3 -wood piece 4 -grades to sil sand 33.4 5 • <'. w 6 SP SM Gray poorly 9 raded SAND with silt and gravel, medium dense, 03! waterbearing Cr 4 s -caved to surface t; Test pit etrminated at 8.0 feet below existing grade.Groundwater table encountered at 8.0 feet during excavation. • • 5 dII W .141V Test Pit Log Old( 4� I Earth Consultants Inc. Candlewood Hotel gwoe \11I1\�i&J GroinChnIcia Poitareari. oists E,,I"w"„enral Renton,Washington pProf.No. 8848 Own. GLS Date Mar. '99 Checked KME Date 3/12/99 1 Plate Ala Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or Interpretation by others of . Test Pit Log i Project Name: 1 Sheet of Candlewood Hotel! 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: • 8648 KME 3/1/99 TP-5 Excavation Contactor. Ground Surface Elevation: 5-Ball Notes: . General o - a v $ Surface Conditions W : Notes (%) rn o �` • g y ' _ I ML Brown SILT, very loose,wet 1 - 2 • • • 50.0 -grades to sandy silt • 4 ew;;:ew;;: ; SP Reddish brown poorly graded SAND, loose,waterbearing . ; 21.7 i.:••s'" p -grades to gray Test pit terminated at 8.0 feet below existing grade.Groundwater table encountered at 4.5 feet during excavation. • • • I s O 2 Test Pit Log (16.11( ai O Earth Consultants Inc. Candlewood Hotel gw 0, \i f�/ ,r1/ GrAmOnies1 r.,Onceri.GcolinI a E.,,acin„n,rai kwsutas Renton,Washington I .Prof.No. 8848 I own. GLS Date Mar. '99 Checked KME Date 3/12/99 I Plate A14 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and to 'cation of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and ludcinent. n They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or Interpretation by others of tnfnnaNnn n.wnted on this lea 1 I . I, . Test Pit Log . Project Name: 1 Sheet of Candlewood Hotel ; 1 1 Job No. Logged by: ' te: Test Pit No.: 8648 KME �3/1/99 TP-6 Er cavatlon Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: 5-Ball 1 Notes: 1 . I ., Surface Conditions: a to Notes 96 E o u. E N E ( ) oN O rn > m ML Brown SILT,very loose,wet • 1 2 • 31.0 3 -grades to sandy silt 4 • • 5 SM Interbedded brown sandy SILT and silty SAND,loose,wet a 32.2 7 8 • 9 Test pit terminated at 9.0 feet below existing grade.No groundwater encountered during mavation. • I N • 0 W ts ,,,,. 14 PIt‘ j Test Pit Log (hill( ai Earth Consultants Inc. Candlewood Hotel g \ i Ivy\,i!JJ Crxweilnlc+lrnoln ess. aFmlrneuitaex,UticltnMcf Renton,Washington J k 0 Pro'.No. 8648 Dwn. GLS Date Mar.'99 Checked KME Date 3/12/99 I Plate A15 Subsurface conditions depicted re esent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modtled by engineering tests,analysts and Judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locatlo s.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or Interpretation by others of I. . Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of Candlewood Hotel , 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 8648 KME 3/1/99 TP-7 E*avatlon Contactor. Ground Surface Elevation: 5-Ball Notes: . o — a m — Surface Conditions: y o�` N mN 'Notes (%) cE7 ML Brown SILT with sand, very loose,wet 1 , • 2 43.8 3 4 ? `< s SP-SM Gray y poorl y graded SAND with silt and gravel, loose,waterbearing 8 is}y:: . 33.8 s' 7 • !`;a 8 • • >:': 9 . Test pit terminated at 10.0 feet below eAsWlgg grade.Groundwater table encountered at 5.0 feet during e,cavation. • . • • • 5 L . h g 1 a. ,,,�•_ f,�. .,Its, Test Pit Log \(h�, �i Earth Consultants Inc. Candlewood Hotel 1, 1,1 fp „w Cool ctnIC I rnarw:a:r.CrOMItsnn IL FnNmmirrral SLYr'rtw Renton,Washington J NProf.No. 8648 Dwn. GLS Date Mar.'99 Checked KME Date 3/12/99 Plate A18 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and l cation of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or Interpretation by others of ' 1 ,Test Pit Log Proled Name: Sheet of 1. Candlewood Hotel 1 1 Job No. logged by: te: Test Pit No.: 8648 KME l3/1/99 TP-8 E acavatlon Contactor. Ground Surface Elevation: 5-Ball Notes: General W L — an — Surface Conditlor is: Notes (%) 6 o a` ti j N ML Brown SILT, very loose,wet 1 2 • 35.9 3 . 4 -grades to r dish brown and gray • a -grades w' silty sand lenses • a SM Gray silty SAND, loose to medium dense,wet 37.9 9 • 10 11 12 Test pit terminated at 12.0 feet below eAsting grade.No groundwater encountered during excavation. • • 5 M i ,,/ �A ,,iv Test Pit Log Q �� 1r o, Earth Consultants Inc. Candlewood Hotel J P1' \l fI/nil W Cwoh:c'n'nl Fneinc ss.Gcolog""'Environmental tic rn Renton,Washington p Prof.No. 8648 I own. GLS Date Mar. '99 Checked KME Date 3/12/99 I Plate A17 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the lime and lboation of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and p�nent. They are nil necessarily representative of other times and krcatl ns.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or Interpretation by others of ..t r vm fInn evwpnted nn this ins_ .3 {• ` � I • • • APPEN I IX B LABORATORY TEST RESULTS E-8648 • Earth Canuukfnts. Inc. - .=,. . SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS T -------.-- SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES I NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH.U.S.STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MM �+Q ,�, _� p ,to p 00 o O p o 00 o 0 0 01 0 0 co co o O, o J 10 V CPI N .- g- .0 ?� 'V mr' N t7 d ID10 m 0 N i 100�ssii im ee1•ea:����eaelLyil�::�al lMI_le�e��e>•�1In�In�=e>•��e�e•••=MIeae�t�� 0 r- MEMO IMMMM■MM1r�MCNIIIIM�ML'MI: MMMMMMMMMM■MNIMMIM�MiMIMMI M�IMMMMIMMMfM•� • -_ MIIIII=MIMIMIMI IMMIIIIIMIIIIMIIMMINIMMIIIIIIIIMMIINMrMIIINMIIIIIIIMIIMII NMI IMMUNE IIMIIIM8.■M._MIMMNIMMIIIIII IIIIIMIIIIIIMIMMINIMIIIIIMIIIMII\IIMMIIIMIIIMIMMIR___r____—___________ �MI�� 90 __�e�I��1111I= +NIntDMNe�MIIMMIIM l_____ MNMINMNIl��-te�eaeae��e�MM�MNMIe�� 10 t1/4.,.L_^,.. IIMI=ElliMii MIN NM imoommeelell kW MINIM IMEIMIMii11MMMMMMMMMIMIMNIIIIII MMIMMMMM111I..MMIM/MMMM111 =MEEMMMMMMMNIMMYMIMa\MMMMM MIME MMI=iMNMMMIMMIMIIII INNMMINN IIIIIIME1M■■IIIMMMMMM=MN= 7 T 1 .11•.I.NNimmuimu••o1iiiiem Nimismomi pro iiiinNimis•••••ImmoINNuilimi=limn am No•IINE 1•12 l+1 ------Mai N�--�M��1------��IIMM�I /IIIIMIMMMI�� '. ry 80 iiiiiIIemImilimiIimaimmumirmaiwimiiIiliminIimmikiimiImtIIIIo NumeeiiiI i=mini moms tmimiNiimionlimmiImm_ 20 12 MIMIMMMIIMM III MMMMMIMM.'MMINNIIIMIIIIIMMIICMIMMMMMMMIMEMMMMMMIII _�IM■MMMIMMMIMIIIII I. " m � lIIIe�II�t�te�NMIi�►aIIn►�In�eImIIIMMMN�1�MINI MIN�•INNI EIMIII�e■s�III MUM I�� ;L--...e-: ___ JII1I�e1�IltBIIIMIE.t�1I®Stl�tlMIIlIIIMIMMINIL�Jt!!_____ IIMJIIIM®I MUM IIMIIMIII®- �- -- ------ ) deem=I min monmuim Mai 11LJMM�M�MMM��1=INIIII IIN�MiMIMIII�IIIIII II1•I■IN.�IM111,ll m ` "', n ����IMINMIMINt1���MM�- _ItIIII1�a7_IIIII�_IIIII�_IIIIIIIIII�IIIONIN111�II1MI III..■____IIIIIIII�� 30 C) m 70 ��IIIIIIII■IIII■IiIIIIII■.III�III m ammam II■sI•�IIIIaIIIIIIII�ussisommiumI1111Im1ImminImI1i11m�messei 1mie1,e1,� n i ` J Z �MMM�MMMMMMMamanmeM�MMMMMMMI��MMM�MII�MIMIMMM�■■.MMMMM�� m .0 ...I �MM■IMIMMMMIMM■MMII�IM INIIMMI.Illaae�Ie��IIMIleeeale MIIMII_MIIIMII IIIIa�eeaMalMIe�sl_� 7 = MIIMMI III _____MMIi_MIIIIMMMMMMMMMMMM■iMMMIMMEMMIMIN MUM MMMIMINIi■■■MMMMMMMIIMMII Z r^ • 60 ��IMIMIMMIIeIMMIMIe11MMe+aeeeaael_eael•I�raelel•a�el•amImIel• em•Ielea�•s� 40 —I . V/ ImmMMMMMMMMIMMMMMMIMIIMNIIIMSIaIIIMIIIIMINIMIMtlaIMMINMIMIIIMI11t•1•MIMIMMIMI.■MIMIIIIM=MIIMNI # r z ��MI MMMMMII7MMt11MIMAM_ MMMMMMMMMMMMM�MMIMMI I IIMMMMMMMM� C) . K �MMMMMMMMMMMN.1N111�� ��I�Mtit�ii■INI��IUMI�I� �ItM�� m O �III=MIIMMMMMIIMMEMite•II I I I � _ I_II.IN III D M 50 �� M�MMMMMMMMIIMMMMM��MMMM I MM■MMMMMM��MMMI M�IMI♦MMIMM M 50 ___MMMMMMMMIIMM IMMM��MMMM■MMMMMMMMa___ _MIMMMMMIIIMMMMIMMMMMM� f. ^-► .{ INNIMMMMMMMMIMMM MUM■MIME IIMIIIIIZIIIMMIEMMIIMMMMMIMIMMMIMIMII MMM IIM.MENIIMMMM I I m IMIIMMMMM I MMMMMMMMMMMMMIIIIIIIIMI\MMMMMMMMMMMMMMIIIMM IIIMMI Mom■■■MMIMMIIIIIIIMMIIIM Si - 40 _MMMIM_ME■MMU_II___'iNI____NIIII��___NM_iM_MI IIII MM_MIIIM NIIM MMONMII IEI IIImim_IMII_N 60 = m �MMMIMMMMMMIMIIMMM MMMNII�_�IMIIIIIIIMM'lttNi_iIIIItIMI_MIIMMMI1tIMM_ 03 Ii () G� INI MMMMMMMM■MIMML IIMMM _IMSIMM7MM_____ EMI______IIIM. = { I mMMMMMMMMMMMMMMIN MtEN�MM� MNIMIIMMIMMI��MIMMMMM�IMMMIMMMMNI 70 l -'I 30 M ____MIII___tip_►7 N■M�MMMMii1MIM _____ ...___ttN_ M m • - �MMMMM�MMMMMMMM1 1110.�M�MMMM►:MaMlMM1MI�IIIMM/MMMM�/MMMMIMM■�� ..' _____ MIMI IICI=MMIMMIIItA41"1111MIMMI1111II1111M►.:11MMIIMMIMIIIMMIMIMMIMINB.■1■IIIMel•M■ III 1=1 11===MI II IO==ICI=M MI IMI IMNIel:=eet INIIMI IIeeeeeIMIIMIMMIll _— �IMI=1 1 MIMMIMIMM I ININM=�Mt'MMMM■MMMMM��MMMM �IMMMMIMMMMI 20 IIIIIIIMMI IaMIINIMIIl1= IMI IMIIIMO.1 MINIM 1•LIMaMISEmMI=MesMEIeaIMmIlINI IIMEM iMm 80 -'I INNIMIIINIIIMMMaIMIMMIM NII M InfliTiNIIIiIIIIMIIMMIIIMillMINIMIMMINMItIIIIIM1IINI MMIIIIIMEMOIIIM =MEMMMMMMMMMMMMIM IMMMIIIMMIMMIMIMMIIMI MMINIMIM\\IMIWIMIIIMIMMIUMMMMIIIIIIMIIMI■MIMM■IIIM MINIM IIMMIMMMMMNIMMMMMMIMINN III■IIMIMMMMINICNIMMIMMMMUINIIM►7MMIIMMIMIIIIIMaMIMIMIMMI..MMIIIMIMMMMIIIMIM III MMMMMMa=MMM1INIMaMMMIMMt11MMIIIIIeaM•IMMEMIMII/IIIMtMISMMIMMIIIIIIM■MMIMMMMIMIIMII 10 IIIIIIIMMMMMMMeIMMMMMMMIIMMMM�MMMMM■M�!MMMM`MII INIMMMMIEeMNMMMMMMMMIIMMin 90 11111=1111MM■MMMMM_N__.___MMIMMIIIMMMIIIIIMMMIBMwI� M111��1I.____ ...MMIMMM_ �MMMMM�M�MIMMMMINIMMIMM■MMI�■MMMM�MM■MMMIn �_IIMMMIIMM I MMI■MM MIIISI MII MIMMIMMMMMMMMMMMMMIIIIMMMMMMMMMIMMIIMMIIIMM II IINIMMMIMIr�+'4MMI__MIeIMMMMIMIMMIIMMIIIIMMIll • n 0 MMMM■MMI■IIMM1�1■IMIMIIN II.MIIMIIMMMMIMMM1■111MM1.MIMMMIMIMIM�1■IIMMIMa�MMIM��.M■MMIIIMMMMMo 1o0 fD 33 O O O m 100 Q l09 N 0 CO CO f" C P7 N ' Cii Ili Q M 0 0 O O O R o o S o o G rT 0 D N GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS o 0 o o a o O Io to COBBLES COARSE I FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE • FINES GRAVEL SAND W C m • =CD p. D Boring or DEPTH • Moisture a o D KEY Test Pit No. (ft.) USCS DESCRIPTION Content (ya1 LL PL r CD • ow °a ~ N O B-1 22.5 SP-SM Gray poorly graded SAND with silt and gravel I 10.2 0___ B-3 27.5 GP Gray poorly graded GRAVEL with sand • 8.9 ~ B-4 7.5 SP-SM Brown poorly graded SAND with silt 28.9 SIEVE ANALYSIS • HYDROMETER ANALYSIS 1 ' . A—'*--- - SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES 1. NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH.U.S.STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MM ! - - pp p G O t0 Q <n N CO CO 8 § O , .. en N ^r- . in co �. eO� e■- N e�IJ �? 000 0 N O Q O O O. O. O O 100 2e��e��■ sw r,��U�im^�i�Irivoiai.�LL�-i.=2a/.11�t�b.'tttitatatttteie��EM•■1a•n� l�0 i■■�im�mm■�rmMIEMI i"L'Mir■`iSi��1!01e!•tii+.1,.�MEMO= IIINOM■I��� �■�_mmimmm_■lmml=Nm.'r1�m�■■■imI•mmmm1INIA:II mlmmlMNmi�•M■■mmli NNE� MIMI=mml_mmlmm■m/MI III MINMMNm IMlia-w.III M mlIIIEmMI NMI mm RIM m��:7mim■mmlNIIIMM111•■1lmmmlm■mmlIIIIIMIN 90 ■mm�m�im�mmmMN�M�MI�MI�M��—NM MN-MMINIae7sl�_MMII��MMNBIW��ea_ti� 10 `' ■�m■siM�mm■��mmlimlm���mmil•��mm��mm\1ml INI NMI lam■■■■��1s�� IMINImNNIMM■i■mm11011MImMINMMNI=II■WWII MNNMNM■m III mEIEl MOM MIMES_MIN IMMIN01•■I■ E=NMI INIMMIN i• m �mm1__m■■______ice■ .�m■�m■mm■mMNI�MIMIllIMIi��8■■■mmlm■m�� ow IMII MI=■mlm■■NMI I=mmlm\mom■Ill■mmC/ll•m10 INN 1•111■mmlMmIMIl8mlmml■■mM 0111111■■11111•11 MIm•1111•11•11111 a Z) 80 IMMIN IlmimmmIMIMI III mlmMm�m■MINI mmmmlm■■INEm•Im■I■ II■IMMEMIMIMI==MI•1111M■E■MIIININNtM==MIMI 20 "D MMImml_mml_a__.mlimmlm■INII■mmmlMINIMIMMmom■mIIIIMMIMMMImmlm■mml1111•■■■•ml1•11mMIIIII -z m INIMMmMIIMml MINIM IIMm=m■miINIE IMINNIMMI■mmmKIM MI Mill mMEIei•_ ___ m■mM�•■■mm=m■mm� --^*- -®®mm®mmmelmm•me1i�®mom®�■mINMm�m��mslmmM�•■emm��mm�- a = n mmmmiiemlmmo�m� melllifoi�■mmm•l•mi�imtti•■III•em■m��m�sm.mI�•I111mllliiimN�� -m - M 70 • ����i�NEiMI�I��i��►�M�i�i�mii=���iiiii�im�� 30 0 Z 81��=��1•�MINIM����m�=KIM=��■11■MIMMIMINI�I�______ ���� n i ■����NI����MMN MOO ■IM ei•Iim���mlmlMi� I l�■■m�■■II� m 2 0 -1 �MNME Mil m■mME�mmIEMI=N■�m�ii�m■m�■MIMI�MIMII•m■mml�E■■■m�NMm�� Z 1. 0 -n 6o ��mio �Ii•1•����iei•ei•■ II�tuiei �■�� �mi�i��is■e�■���i m 40 -I i. (f) III=OEM OnMIMI MIM ION_II=MI Em■11■■maim\1MNmMI■mMNImmIIIIImlmmlm■mml100010=11■■■101mlm■mIIMI MN= ��=mmlimm•�mmIMMIII m■ ■_mrMI1�m�■���IMMIE ml�•M11001ml�m�� -1 - m mmlm\ aMENEMMI m■�I■�m■Mai�mlam���NIMI=1 ■mml�•■■■NImlm■�� Q s ■��mmlm■mI MINIml��i�■mml�i�l�mINNINI •��mlmmli��•■■■mmlm■m�� lemmmmsmemm1■mmsmsommlmisommem■eieimr.7m�mmeasemlmYi •su■moIi•mmli•� 50 D 5° �m �m�memsessmm■ ni�■mm�lm•mIMINI ■mIi•��I•m�imM�•■■■m�MmI� 03 MIll ■EI NM■ ■mm101110111mmlNMI i1111111.11=■1 m■mNIIIIIMININMIMImlIIIMEIMIllmIIII=M MINI01111•■■■mm1= IIMIIIIIIMI CA -G IImmMImlIIIINmmmm111111110mMM11111111•11mmmm MIMEO LEI MINIM 11■MINIM= II=MII■■■IIImIIIIIIM MIM MIIIIIIII m i• (r) m■■IIMmm___mmmm____ ■IMIIMMIIImmia111•11111 11 11111mMIIIIIIImIIIMIIMINIM•■■■IIIIM= mMIIIIIIMI �ml�mmlmmmi�mml�mim■�■i■mmI•m■mmim�■Im■1■■■��•■ ININ=Mm�� i rams40 —mImINI■mm1111111Mm■1■■m111111■■1Um■mom■m1mm■II■ m1m1M1m■m11•IitI■mNIIMImIIIIIINIM1111 60 IT1 IMIIIIMmmlm■mMm■mMEHMImlmm■mom■0111111=1111i1=111111111111MIIIIMIIMISIMINmlmmlm■M11110•u■mmmlm■ immumi 03 : _____ Imam■NIMN NNINN MINI MI ■mm=■■m1m11 IMMEIm�■Im■Im■■��•■I INMI ■■■■� ▪ n Imm INIII mmIM=NIMINIImim■ ■immm•111mllmmmmmmMININNimm•m■mm1111111111111111•■■■m1m■mml11111111•11111 • • I30 •mm�■■■�mmlmmaIM=■mlMmlmt� 1■mmml�m�1.lmmmmmm�naiiiim•mmli ssommmlm■mml�70 ...i �m��mmlmmm�IMmml�m���mmmml�■�mammm�m�mlmml�mml�•■■■mml�m�� m �m��m��m=�m��m�m■�mmm��m���mm�m��m�im=1 ■IIle1■mml�mml� ����m��m��m�M_____a m��,M■�m �m�im��•■■mm��m�� C) - ■ ____ =11=1Il;fCeJG1 1=11=1=111.1imi001iNIIMJ11■Im10011 1111111•11■■mIIIMml•■iMMIIIMI �m�NMmmlmmm=MEmmlMmMMN�mmm�imml�iIMmmmm�mlmml_m_�8■■�mmlMmml� 20 —m1iMona milmimm■Im■ om■ ■mmesm■mmm■tmemm■I■Imesimmlmmlm■m�emmemsemeeesemmemem 80 -•I IIMIIMIimmlMII■iINIImimimp■■ImmmIi■IMINIII•IIIII IImlmml■■m1110111MININII•MIIIMINII I MIIIIMIIMIMIm■mmlmmmIIMIm■I0011mm■m■INIM■IMI m■mIIIIINNmIIIImmmlmMINIM■Imml■■■1111111111•■I.mm_m■mIIIMIMINIII 1111111=1111•1mmlmmmt01EmmlMIllmMI0i111100=10mmm=m■m•11111=mlmm1•11m1111MM■Im■Im■m0110110111•111i■■mmmlm■mml101•11•1 MIImmlm■mmlm111MIM mlIMImIIIm■ 111■mmmlMmmlISOm\\mmm I Imimmlm■_IMII■■UUUM0m■mm1111M 10 NMMIMIIIIMIIIMIIMIMIIIMMIIIMUIMMMMMIIMIIINmmolimmi siommm■Iei•iiusei•Immiimom mamamm■ iiimi 90 Imam■mmlm■m1=111111mml11111mINIIIMImmmINIIIN■MIm■mlf V mmlmINNIMINI mlmmlm■m1111 •N■■m1•1■■m1110111MINI Milinimml1=1m■1■mm111111M11==mINIMIMMMImmmIIMI■miIMm`rl011mIINNI mlmmlm■mm1IIIII■■■mmmlNNImmlIMIIIIMII . IM=NIMmMEMI■MPME■NEINNmmlNNImNEmAINIMINMI MINNEM■ INIMMmml■m•0011111NmIMm■mMI •M■■mmiIMmININNEM m==mm1•■1.■■I=Imlmmlmm1�1110■•Imim��■mmml■•II■m1•■1�m=•[II !�11■mm11M■EM�■■■■mmm■m in 100 111 n 0 O 0 O O O O O O O O ID Q In N m 13 < Pf N Ib CD e7 N m IO V N N 0 O 0 Ri IO Q M N .� • O O S O O O O O O O O 0 �" ra► a D In N GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS o O 0 O O 0 o o. 2 O 1-6 COARSE I FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE oto COBBLES FINES N GRAVEL SAND w• o. m CO • o• a D Boring or DEPTH Moisture o o > KEY Test Pit No. (ft.) USCS DESCRIPTION Content (%• LL PL O I-' r/) . a m p TP-5 7.0 SP Gray poorly graded SAND I 21.7 0___ TP-7 3.0 ML Brown SILT with sand 43.6 0 TP-8 2.5 ML Brown SILT • 35.9 DISTRIBUTION E-86 8 4 Copies Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 16215 — 72"a Avenue South Kent, Washington 98032 Attention: Mr. Dan Balmelli • • • • • Earth Consultants. Inc. � + ,s, Chrietoph rbrown fn Associates � 9688 l,2ainier Ave. 8. 11 &eatcle, WA 98118-5981 (206) ?22-1910 fax (206) T22-19Q9} DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON JAW 04 ., TRAFFIC 'IMPACT ANALYSIS RECEIVED for the John C. Radovich Development Company ' regarding the proposed South 405 Place Office Building in the City of -enton ?.�a[.. .. � < , • fs‘tr+,t coo �a 44* "*.,00,,,_ December 27, 1998 I , Traffic Engineers C4 Transportation Planners I ' ` A 1 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS South 405 Place Office Building Table of Contents Purpose 1 . Location - 2. Development Plan 2 . Trip Generation 2. Horizon Year U 4. Adjacent Land Uses 4. Trip Distribution 4. Traffic Data 6. Horizon Year Traffic 6. Horizon Year Traffic With Project 6. Level's of Service 13 . Travel Demand Management 15 . Transportation Management P1 n 15 . Mitigation Measures 16. Mitigation Fees 16. Conclusions 17 . List of Figures Figure 11 Vicinity Map 3. Figure 2 Trip Distribution in Percent 5 . Figure 13 Current 1999 AM Peak Hour Volumes 7 . Figure 4 Current 1999 PM Peak Hour Volumes 8. Figure 15 2001 AM Peak Hour Volumes w/o Project 9 . Figure 16 2001 PM Peak Hour Volumes w/o Project 10 . Figure 7 2001 AM Peak Hour Volumes with Project 11 . Figure '8 2001 PM Peak Hour Volumes with Project 12 . List of Tables Table I Trip Generation 2 . Table II Levels of Service & Average Delay 14. Table LII Peak Hour Volumes with TMP 17 . Appendix 1 LOS Computer Analyses Christopher brown 0 Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909 sJ • TRAFFIC I ACT ANALYSIS for the proposed South 405 Place Office Building by the I . John C. Radovich Development Company City of Renton II Purpose The purpose of this study is eightfold and includes the following elements. o Obtain current morning and afternoon peak hour traffic volumes and other traffic characteristics on the arterial street system -!I SW 16th Street - serving the proposed South 405 Place Office Building; o Obtain background traffic growth for inclusion in the traffic analysis to expand data to the year 2001 ; .o IDefine and assign site generated traffic produced by the proposed development on the city street network; o Identify the potentially impacted arterial street intersections lying on each side of the site, to wit, the intersections of Lind and Oaksdale Avenues SW on 16th Street SW: o Identify the current and future levels of service (LOS) at these potentially impacted intersections for both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours without project implementation. o Identify the future levels of service (LOS) at these impacted intersections for both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours with the project completed and occupied. o Identify possible " . . . measures to reduce or control transportation impacts . . . . " per city memorandum. o Estimate the range of traffic mitigation fees based on the use of Institute of Transportation Engineer' s (ITE) Trip Generation Manual data with and without the implementation of a Transportation Management Plan. Christopher brown CS Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. S. -1- (Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909/ Location The location of the project site, as indicated on the Vicinity Map, Figure 1 , is on the north side of 16th Street SW about a . block east of the Oaksdale Avenue SW intersection in the City of Renton. Development Plan The office building will include 3 stories with some tenant parking below the structure. Leasable space will be about 53, 544 gsf. Parking for 197 vehicles will be entirely on site. Trip Generation The trip generation is estimated on the basis of the commonly used data published by the Institute of Transportation Engineer' s (ITE) under Land Use Code 710 for General Office Buildings per the 6th (most recent) edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual. The data are shown in Table I, below. TABLE I Trip Generation Dependant Variable - Average Trip Rates Scale 53 . 55 ksf Time Period Traffic Volumes A.W.D.T. 590 Trips A.M. inbound 74 v.p.h. A.M. outbound 10 v.p.h. P.M. inbound 14 v.p.h. P.M. outbound 60 v.p.h. Christopher Brown CAS Associates _2_ 9688 Rainier Ave. 8. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 'Z22-1909 1 : ---... � '•, iusln •W S1 128TH `'• •►L " " ; N 4TH • Y repo ::01,,, ( B200 ST I" TH\( sT !a o t An 1 1100 . S•J129TH PL S 129TH ST a1 R __• -1 W a < lid NM •L rd I > < 5_1. or9_ 161 • _• oy Nw 5-0 vi r cc W N. 1•4 °' _ `-. `.%..:35n.c S<I1301H ST ST. C NW I v W 3RD g I Cl G]1-6 ,tea. - - - ' -' --LANGSTON, RD : _c��;10. '"'_ I :I.s I • - z �Z fcM O I RENTON �� I W T- -.-I'-1Pl) :liar, grw-R • \81 9p !1 1 -ilea N AIRPORT RT N ST •[ F'• L=J �, S 132ND y, ST ,Alh^, sT Ift C F-' /ITyF ' 133RD --51- - :rHo ST t _ _ 2ND ' - S TILLICU�I.ST S ~ Ir •` $ ' 1100 S = � TILULUI 4�4 � 4 !� �:: I STI `MEP TOBIN ST a\�� i SA Su r '\IN(j „S_ t_35TN Sr j341H S \rrT t oy9 = I S � S VICTORIA. 300 Q rtatswr.R a�f4r J 'BQ�a ,� J� 1,�5- o1347,41croe1A -ST R.[[- I RENTON z w 'V - i /yj A �i w sr (�: N SN.2NDST y 18 ► Hs N Cr),rn, 1,9ERn O",• L _v • \s l rr. $ LING.. 5l !WIGS, . ` S 3 2ND _ 53 ST .y..,, ' �n1 I PARK �/ N SW} 2ND P tY/ csj 5— --1 ATH _ T S �' 0.t""rRw�I . ° A q, rn (., to t: F5 !r " S 3RD . � � in,. y SN Q RlDL[��y_ � lc' 1 - TT' �• ----' �0 W 900 3R0 o S STI QI I Sr BLACK RIVER . -SSW ISUN A ,�, 2 S -' 4TH rr �!�STQ' '' .�/ \\� i� St RIPARIAN FOREST •iR118N Wi NEYER S / r`0001PPII41.11°. ''' IL V \ CENTER y l ~ m to !��in .4 ��. y Sr RR r g sarnr j �' Ii a �j3RD p 1 ,t. 1 ER Sw �P -+ 4� ¢ S iH IrR+Rmi =1````' I S� I s- 'fl'\ i . ST I1 1,' 6TH I • L_14rii \• �kD4LE Av gill 7TH ST IPA, '1,:6 1 S hTl . t ;T / • \ s ,°s N g 1 1 �Ic=n i 1Ig `. N / ''_1 a 1±Oa ►- i. ti- \P A/1 JA IL 21—�In r,r PARK r-) 1 O% r'•, o. I I 1 -- fORT� \ o y > 1 I N(¢ 16 RIDE 1— I G i; I� \ I 1 I S DENTI • i J 1 ItEN70N VILLAGE s T 4' ! PAkK : ' f' wI L4 15W Ln��. V.. �IOTHI1 \ �S 1 DI I CENTER I St -'r ; r0 �� SW R. ]01H � SS c S RENTON VILLAGE PL OLIDAY // , I c, .°';;' '' .._._, �^ —' INN 4 OW1N 51 .� VR /1 •� N (ii Co J.e' / • I ! 2 ft IA[r SfRI�l1 I' CT\0 rp+- OO s JY yy ia1 i I I ST $W t , rim S �! 3�1STH r • S. .s -- SW '•,._. 16EH N ST QQ ' `:T ice' 16 H ST 400 H -:. g +1 ,iC CD O • HSi � � o - 1 �� I S 16TH SiST • �,.. N 3q;Dj. TUKWIL4 \ !E e% r ( i E "11 I �i S „'i %- -- 4" 'NJ'CD - _- - _et -�4-•—t 13TH ST- --- ..l -- = cni • ts11 f I SW 19TH ST WINO MILL An LP ST �I P p� �O "� i ' s . ^ I S 19TH ST k. TALBOT• I O ^ �' �� � `n • V 1 �I� 2orN g HILL �� S i . kr) Q �' PKWY r .� PL PARK ( 00 -MT �• I O . .\ EONG455 r Sid 2151 $T 1, .n as (� EYANS RACK;;qi..... rn • � 2 sums `r' SW 23RD ST S 23RD i 3( ST iil, 5 tJ BAKER BLVD W' ! } Y� �s \\\\` ////// _; ;ESID[Mfl i rt- I Jy f�_. _ S 25TH a -S •'• /cTN I i 1 Horizon Year For the purposes of this study, the completion time for full occupancy of the project is taken at the year 2001 . It is recognized that the project may well be occupied ahead of this date but, for planning purposes, the year 2001 ensures an adequate period of time to encompass additional background traffic growth. Adiacent Land Uses The adjacent, developed land uses include a major grouping of Boeing Company office buildings on the former Longacres Race Track site while to the east of the site are commercial auto-oriented repair facilities and other office buildings. The proposed office building does not represent a departure from the adjacent land uses. Being compatible with the land uses in the immediate vicinity, its traffic circulation patterns should not impact the neighborhood as it is now existing or otherwise developing. Trip Distribution Traffic generated by the South 405 Place Office Building will be distributed onto the adjacent roadway access system and then onto the regional transportation network as shown on Figure 2, Trip Distribution in Percent. This distribution is based on the "Analogy" methbd described by Vergil Stover and Frank Koepke, in Transportation and Land Development, published by ITE, 1988. This method is considered the most appropriate since the project is fundamentally a continuation of the current office building element found in the general area and naturally presupposes the same kind of population distribution as now employed in the existing offices. No significant errors are anticipated from the use of this traffic distribution method. Christopher Brown 65 Associates _4- 9688 Rainier Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) T22-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909 11 t X • aInterurban Avenue West Valley Highway Oaksdale Avenue SW 0 0 SITEPu (D rr SZ l /y Lind Avenue SW Nem _ 7 i' I `fl /2 l East Valley Road 19 FIGURE 2 Trip Distribution in Percent Christo her Brown Cn Associates � P 9688 Rainier Ave. 8. —5— , C " Seattle, WA 98118-5981 / (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909' Traffic Data Current traffic data for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours are shown, respectively, in Figures 3 and 4. It should be noted that with the exception of the p.m. peak hour traffic volume at the intersection of Oaksdale Avenues SW at 16th Street SW all data was obtained from the files of the City Traffic Engineer, City of Renton (Mr. Ron Marr) . At the intersection of Oaksdale Avenues SW and 16th Street SW the field data were gathered in late December. While weather conditions had not deteriorated the advent of the Christmas shopping season may have influencied the demand. This could not be avoided. However, by inspection, it appears to be in line with typical peak hour data at the Lind Avenue SW intersection. Horizon Year Traffic The year 2001 traffic, without this project but including the background traffic growth, was derived from an overall growth rate found from the historical traffic volume records on SR 167 north of Grady Way over the years 1994 through - 1998. The background growth rate was 1 .63 percent per year. This relatively low rate of traffic growth is not unusual when contrasted against a PSRC predicted growth rate of 1 .0 percent per year in employment for this general area. The year 2001 morning and evening peak hour forecast volumes (without the project) are shown on Figures 5 and 6. Horizon Year Traffic with Project Figures 7 and 8 show the a.m. and p.m. peak hour turning movement volumes which can be expected for the horizon year (Year 2001 With Project) traffic. The data includes the potential traffic from the background growth previously described., (.4 Christopher Brown 0. Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. -6- (Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909 j I dtrIlilmomminglr • '....e, /// 1 M , rh Lind Avenue SW M ,, ,:,, • • .„. _ .• 6,, „, O , 3 rn ry 4) South 405 Place 4 ai 4 Site Access to p M V O 4\ C\ I...) � N Oaksdale Avenue SW s m N FIGURE 3 Current (19 9 9) A.M. Peak Chrigtopher Brown es Aggociatcg Hour Volume _ (C,OC 9688 Rainier Ave. (S. (Seattle, WA 98118-5981 • (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1910 i ....) ...6....11 s' • • \,/) Lind Avenue SW T M T (1--- �1 h .—‘ li r .) v) ,r.,, 6.. N b., 0 N cn 1 • N 4i South 405 place O a) 4i Site Access 4 o N � N zz 1 -.. '..K.,.. i.) o Oaksdale Avenue SW tt M __T H -i) --"14- (�1 • .FIGURE 4. Current (1999) P.M. Peak C.--;-1(111111116 Christopher Brown & Aaaociates \Hour Volumes9688 Rainier Ave. S. Seattle, WA 981185981_8_ (206) 222-1910 Fax (206) '122-1910\ I • 1 � N 1\,1 NLind Avenue SW M T ill I C kr) 7.51 • o M cn cn 4-i South 405' Place ai P Site Access cn to n1 -I M cA 1 -±1) '''''s N m Oaksdale Avenue SW S T I r\---" r,_ FIGURE 5 2001 A.M. Peak Hour Volumes (64t Christopher Brown esA�oeiatc8 Without Project P 9688 Rainier Ave. 8. ; 9_ (Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 222-1910 Fax (206) 722-1910 I cc H 11"--- c: I \ ..e____ .- Lind Avenue SW tA —____ . bN TV I N M N ,.. , _,. Q �- ‘(11 (7,.. N - South 405 Place a) -4- Site Access co 1 � N I � ..::..._?-' Oaksdale Avenue SW M rfr-, cNt FIGURE 6 I 2001 P.M. Peak Hour Volumes Christopher Brown ?5 Associates Without Project 9688 Rainier Ave. S. -10- 1Seattle, WA 98118-5981 4 (206) T22-1910 Fax (206) 722-1910 I \t„/// 1 \\:-h — NLind Avenue SW \,(7. \\ 7/:‘,-.. .. .e.,} CI°. 1-77--- - LI South 405 Place �' aoi P Site Access En "''‘'''.4 hi) 43 H - 1:-)-' 1\( 1] Oaksdale Avenue SW _ --�- I ‘;:---"It.. I‘ rk_ I FIGURE 7 • 2001 A.M. Peak Hour Volumes Christopher Brown (f Associates\ • With Projectii- 9688 Rainier Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (ZO6) 722-1910 Fax (206) TZZ-19��—11_ • . o Lind Avenue SW cP _T 16 S • IAA yl South 405 Place 4 Site Access N H M � Oaksdale Avenue SW M � FIGURE 8 I 2001 P.M. Peak Hour Volumes Christopher Brown to Associate With Project • 9688 Rainier Ave. 8. -12- (Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1910 Level of Service The level of service (LOS) describes the quality of traffic flow. This ranges from the best or highest level, 'A' , usually denoted by an ability to select ones ' own speed or the ability to change lanes or overtake at will, down to the lowest of worst level 'F' ! This LOS is the lowest possible level and is one where traffic is severely constrained. It is usually denoted by "jam" conditions and attendant long traffic delays. At unsignalized intersections LOS 'F' means that there is great difficulty in entering or crossing the mainline traffic stream so that long delays are encountered by side street motorists. Capacity computations were performed in accordance with Special Report 209, the 1994 Highway Capacity Manual, 3rd edition, (up-dated, 1994) with software made available through the University of Florida. To estimate the most appropriate or best signal timing at signalized intersections, the computer program Signal-94was used. (Note: it is not possible within the context of this planning study to use any arterial street progression signal programs to enure arterial through progression but, to take this into account, all signal cycle lengths are kept at 80 seconds whLch also has the advantage enhancing left turn levels of service. In actual practice, the cycle lengths are as long as 90 seconds. ) The unmitigated Levels of Service include three scenarios. These are as follows. 1 . Current Year (1999) with present road geometry; 2 . The Horizon Year (2001 ) with present road geometry but Without the South 405 Place Office Building: 3 . The Horizon Year (2001 ) with present road geometry but With the South 405 Place, Office Building: When reviewing the following LOS summaries note that the computer input and results are included in the Appendix. The appendix computations show the degree of saturation, average delays, maximum queue lengths and approach LOS values as well as the overall LOS values. For simplicity, only the LOS and average per vehicle delay (in seconds) are used in the following table. The driveway analysis islonly at the Year 2001 since the lot is now empty. Christopher brown CAS !Associates 9688 12ainier Ave. S. -13- Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) T22-1909 , . , • TABL II Levels of Service & Average Delay Intersection Current 2001 2001 Year 'No Project W/Project LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay Morning Peak Hour 16th St. SW/Oaksdale Ave. B 14.5 B 14. 6 B 14.7 Afternoon Peak Hour 16th St. SW/Oaksdale Ave. B 14.8 B 14.9 C 15 . 1 Morning Peak Hour 16th St. SW/Lind Ave. SW C 18.3 C 18.4 C 18. 4 Afternoon Peak Hour 16th St. SW/Lind Ave. SW C 21 . 1 C 21 .4 C 21 ..6 Morning Pak Hour 16th St. SW/Site Access (Showing lowest LOS) B 6.5 Afternoon Peak Hour 16th St. SW/Site Access (Showing lowest LOS) B 5 . 5 As a planning study it is not the intent to derive the best signal operations timing requirements of each intersection. It is only to indicate what the overall LOS is suggested under the broad categories of this study anO, in particular, that the project does not appreciably impact the two key arterial intersections under review. What the study analysis does show, however, is that. the project will not induce any downward shift in the morning or afternoon LOS at the two intersections. Stated another way, the project does not produce any measurable impact in the a.m. or p.m. peak hours which, for the city, are considered to be the worst case peak hours. Christopher Brown 0 Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. S. -14- ...0 Seattle, WA 98118 5981 (206) 222-1910 fax (206) 'Z22-1909 . I Travel Demand Management As an office building with possibly on-site employment most likely in the range of 110 to 200 persons, and since these office types of activity also involve clerical and other on-site staff functions that do not rely on automobile travel throughout the day for business purposes, an opportunity may exist to enhance both car-pooling and transit use. Typically, Travel Demand Management (TDM) opportunities exist with office buildings and can be used to partially off-set the predicted peak hour auto travel. This type of approach is included with a Transportation Management Plan (T P) . The goal of this task will address Item 11 (g) of the Background data sheet, concerning " . . . proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts. " Transportation Management Plan The following Transportation Management Plan is proposed as the developer' s contribution to t]ie overall goal of reducing reliance on private automobiles for commute trips. 1 . Sidewalk design and construction and/or designated pledestrian walks shall be focused to the existing sidewalks along 16th Street SW with the goal of ensuring that these new amenities will provide good access to the transit syttem. 2 . All sidewalk construction for the office building will be undertaken with the primary objective of providing an all-weather (hard and drained) surface for pedestrians so that potential transit use will be made more attractive. 3. Nighttime external site illumination will also consider the needs of pe estrians so that future METRO patrons are assured of a safe environment. 4. Space will be made available in the lobby of the building for posting current METRO bus schedules. 1 • Christopher Brown fn Associates -15- (.499688 Rainier Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909 Mitigation Measures First,' the access to the site is from SW 16th Street which is a recently constructed 3-lane facility. With an existing center 2-way left turn lane it will operate with an acceptable LOS as shown in Table II . Second, no change to the signal operating system at each end of the fronting arterial, , to wit, th'e intersections of Lind and Oaksdale Avenues SW on 16th Street SW, is required. They function very well with their present phasing and timing. Third, the principal site related mitigation measure will be the aboveldescribed Transportation Management Plan. To conclude, the project does not produce a shift in the LOS in either the noon or the p.m. peak hour at any intersection reviewed in this study. Of note, these are the two time periods of concern to city DPW staff. With no significant change tocthe LOS in the peak periods no additional mitigation measures are suggested apart from the above Transportation Management Plan. Mitigation Fees With the previously described Transportation Management Plan there will be a coincident reduction in peak hour travel demand. Typically, this reduction in peak hour traffic may range from 10 to 40 percent and will positively impact both the a.m. and the p.m. peak hour site generated traffic volumes. Since the ;regular traffic mitigation fee of $75 per new trip generated usually applies to the peak hour traffic, and since the commute trip reduction program described above also applies to the peak hour trip generation, the data of Table I may be used to estimate the range of new peak hour traffic volumes given the implementation of the a ove described Transportation Management Plan. The upperland lower range in peak hour volume along with the average trip generation expected, as a result of the TMP, is shown in the following table. Christopher Brown CS Associates (111C1:11 9688 Rainier Ave. S. -16- Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909f r TABLE III Peak Hour Volumes with TMP Interval High Low Average A.M. inbound 67 44 56 veh. /hour A.M. outbound 9 6 8 veh. /hour P.M. inbound 13 8 11 veh. /hour P.M. outbound 54 36 45 veh. /hour Next, considering the traffic mitigation fee of $75 per new trip generated, this will also range from a high to a low value depending on the peak hour value under consideration. The range in mitigation fees is shown below. High End Trip Fee $75/trip X (67 + 9 a.m. trips) = $5, 700 Low End Trip Fee $75/trip X (36 + 8) p.m. trips) _ $3, 300 Naturally, since trip mitigation fees are to address peak hour traffic issues, in keeping with customary procedures, the peak hour traffic rate is used for the above estimates. Finally, the proponent should reserve the opportunity to confirm the actual traffic demand after the facility is fully occupied and the TMP is in operation to validate the final, correct trip mitigation fee. Conclusions The following conclusions may be drawn. 1 . The project will generate some 590 vehicular trips per day with 84 of these taking place in the morning and 74 Christopher Brown Cn Aociates (67t ss9688 rainier Ave. S._17_ Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909/ in the evening peak hour. This does not presume the. implementation of a Transportation Management Plan. 2 . The 53, 544 g.s.f. building will have 3 stories and provide parking for 197 vehicles. 3 . The growth rate of traffic in this area is about 1 . 63 percent per year. 4. The project will be built and fully occupied by the year 2001 , the horizon year. 5 . The inclusion of this project with background traffic growth does not alter the levels of service on the arterial system in the mor ing or evening peak hours. 6. The most meaningful mitigation measure for this project will be the implementation of a Transportation Management Plan (TMP) to enhance transit and car-pool use. 7 . The principal mitigation measure is associated with the TMP and ensuring adequate pedestrian linkages to the external arterial system a d its transit stops . 8. With the implementation of a TMP, the peak hour volumes will range from a high of 76 trips per hour to a low of 44 trips per hour. 9 . There is a traffic mitigation fee of $75 per new trip generated imposed by the city. 10 . Based on the standard traffic mitigation fee, and with a TMP program, the range in fees is from $5, 700 to $3, 300 . 11 . The proponent should reserve the opportunity to validate the peak hour traffic volumes at the site after the building has been placed in operation and the TMP program has been fully implemented so that verification of the proper impact fee can be obtained. t Christopher brown e5 Associates _18_ 9688 Rainier Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909} TRAFFIC IMPA( T ANALYSIS South 405 Place office Building APPEN IX LOS Anal uses Current Operations 1 . Oaksdale Avenue SW/16th Street SW A.M. JCR-C1A 4. Oaksdale Avenue SW/16th Street SW P.M. JCR-C1P Horizon Year Operations Without Squth 405 Place Office Building I 7 . Oaksdale Avenue SW/16th Street SW A.M. JCR-H1A 10 . Oaksdale Avenue SW/16th Street SW P.M. JCR-H1P Horizon Year Operations With South 405 Place Office Building 13. Oaksdale Avenue SW/16th Street SW A.M. JCR-P1A 16. Oaksdale Avenue SW/16th Street SW P.M. JCR-P1P Current Operations 19 . Lind Avenue SW/16th Street SW A.M. JCR-C2A 22 . Lind Avenue SW/16th Street SW P.M. JCR-C2P Horizon Year Operations Without South 405 Place Office Building 25 . Lind Avenue SW/16th Street SW A.M. JCR-H2A 28. Lind Avenue SW/16th Street SW P.M. JCR-H2P Horizon Year Operations With South 405 Place Office Building 31 . Lind Avenue SW/16th Street StA, A.M. JCR-H2A 34. Lind Avenue SW/16th Street SW P.M. JCR-H2P Horizon Year Operations With South 405 Place Office Building 37 . Access Drive/16th Street SW A.M. JCR-C3A.HCO 40 . Access Drive/16th Street SW P.M. JCR-C3P.HCO /,Mr" Christopher Brown e5 Associates � 9688 Rainier Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909/ r . South 405 Place 12/27/99 16th Street SW/Oaksdale Avenue SW 14 : 14 :41 Current A.M. Peak Hour File JCR-C1A SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD LOSTTIME 3.0 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES 3.0 .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 I0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NO E NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 1 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 25 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 138 185 255 164 93 27 17 66 4 4 62 16 WIDTHS .0 24.0 12 .0 . 0 1210 12 .0 .0 24.0 12 .0 .0 12.0 24 .0 LANES 0 2 1 0 11 1 0 2 1 0 1 2 UTILIZATIONS I .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 . 00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS 3.0 2 .0 5.0 21.0 210 4 .0 12 .0 12 .0 .0 .0 .0 6.0 PEAKHOURFACTORS .95 .95 .95 .89 .89 .89 .71 .71 .71 .83 .83 .83 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 13 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 410 4.0 4 .0 4 .0 4.0 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 MINIMUMS 5. 0 5.0 5 .0 5.0 510 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5 . 0 5. 0 5.0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.60 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NSTOPFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 0 3421 1693 0 1519 1736 0 3288 887 0 1882 3406 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 27 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET .00 1 CYCLES 80 110 10 PEDTIME .0 0 GREENTIMES 23.07 7.57 24.86 8 .50. YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4 .00 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 3 8 5 11 EXCESS 0 /l / South 405 Place 12/27/99 16th Street SW/Oaksdale Avenue SW 14: 14: 13 Current A.M. Peak Hour File JCR-C1A SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 27 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 **/** + + * + + + + * + + **** / \ <+ + *> <+ + <**** V V A +4+ A V ++++ North <+ * *> ****> I + * * **** + * * v G/C= .288 G/C= .095 G/C= .311 G/C= . 106 G= 23. 1'j G= 7.6" G= 24 .97 G= 8.5" Y+R= 4 .0'i Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4 .07 Y+R= 4 .0" OFF= .0% OFF=33.8% OFF=48.3 OFF=84 .4% C= 80 sec G= 64 .0 sec = 80.0% Y-116.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% MVMT TOTALS N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Int Param:Units RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total AdjVol: vph 152 205 268 156 104 30 25 98 6 5 75 20 1144 Wid/Ln:ft/# 0/0 24/2 12/1 0/0 12/1 12%1 0/0 24/2 12/1 0/0 12/1 24/2 g/C Rqd@C:% q 14 21 0 23 5 0 7 2 0 8 2 g/C Used: % 0 45 30 0 32 32 0 11 11 0 12 12 SV @E: vph 0 1524 509 . 0 491 561 0 352 84 0 217 405 4143 Svc Lvl:LOS B+ C+ C+ B C C C C B Deg Sat:v/c .00 .23 .53 .00 .53 05 .00 .35 .06 .00 .36 .05 .38 Avg Del:s/v .q 14 . 1 25.5 .0 24 .6 18 8 .0 34 .0 33.2 .0 34 .4 31.4 23 .3 Tot Del:min 9 21 28 0 27 2 0 17 1 0 11 3 110 # Stops:veh 0 55 56 0 53 5 0 29 1 0 18 4 221 Max Que:veh 0 9 8 0 8 1 0 5 0 0 3 1 35 Max Que: ft 0 112 214 0 211 25 0 65 25 0 78 25 214 APPR TOTALS Int Param:Units N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Total AdjVol: vph 625 290 129 100 1144 Svc Lvl:LOS 7 B B C C B Deg Sat:v/c .36 .48 .34 .29 . .38 Avg Del:s/v 19.0 24 .0 34.0 33.8 23 .3 Tot Del:min 49 . 29 18 14 110 # Stops:veh 111 58 30 22 221 Max Que:veh 17 9 5 4 35 Max Que: ft 214 211 65 78 214 2 .. 9 South 405 Place 12/27/99 16th Street SW/Oaksdale Avenue SW 14 : 14:05 Current A.M. Peak Hour File JCR-C1A SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) .38 Vehicle Delay 14 .5 Level of Service B Sq 27 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 I Phase 3 Phase 4 1 **/** + + * + + ' + + * + + **** / <+ + *> <+ + <**1** V V ++Ih+ V ++++ North <+ * *> ****> + * * **** ▪ * * G/C= .288 G/C= .095 G/C= 311 G/C= . 106 G= 23. 1" G= 7.6" G= 24.9r G= 8.5" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4 .0 i' Y+R= 4 .0" OFF= .0% OFF=33.8% . OFF=48.3% OFF=84.4% C= 80 sec G= 64 .0 sec = 80.0% Y=16.0 sec = 20 .0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% Lane Width/ , g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L Group Lanes1 Regd Used @C (vph) @E IVolumel v/c Delay S 19(genxl N Approach 11.9 B LT+RTI 12/1 I .211 .301 11427 11509 268 I .527 I 15.8 14: 1 214 It ! S Approach 1 21.6 C LT+RTI 12/1 II .017 I . 107 I 248 I N I 126 I .34 063 I 20.7 l *C 25 ftI E Approach 14 .8 B THI LT 12/1 12/1 1 .048 I .323 I 480 I 961 I 230 I .053 1 12 .0 I *B+ I 225 ftI W Approach 21. 1 C LT+RTI 24/2 II .025 I . 119 I 276 I 405 I 20 I .049 1 20.2 I *C I 25 ftI South 405 Place 12/27/99 16th Street SW/Oaksdale Avenue SW 14 :20 :06 Current P.M. Peak Hour File JCR-C1P 1 SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD LOSTTIME 3.0 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES 3.0 .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 .. 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 1 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 25 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS - RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 23 123 188 197 21 10 18 87 7 9 23 36 WIDTHS .0 24.0 12.0 .0 12.0 12.0 .0 24.0 12.0 .0 12 .0 24 .0 LANES 0 2 1 . 0 1 4 ..1 0 2 1 0 1 2 UTILIZATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS .0 7 .0 7.0 .0 10.0 10.0 .0 .0 .0 .0 . 0 .0 PEAKHOURFACTORS .58 .58 .92 .82 .75 .58 .64 .59 .58 .75 .91 .75 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 13 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 4.0 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 MINIMUMS - 5 .0 5.0 5.0 5.0 51.0 5.0 5 .0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5 .0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 NSTOPFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 0 3451 1662 0 1623 1641 0 3709 986 0 1808 3610 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 27 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS - - YES YES YES YES . OFFSET .00 1 CYCLES 80 110 10 PEDTIME .0 0 GREENTIMES 21.34 ---9.66 24 .46 8.55 YELLOWTIMES 4 .00 4.00 4.00 4 .00 CRITICALS 3 8 5 11 EXCESS 0 I . ' 4/• • South 405 Place 12/27/99 16th Street SW/Oaksdale Avenue SW 14 : 19:22 Current P.M. Peak Hour File JCR-C1P SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[�1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 27 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 I Phase 3 I Phase 4 **/** + + * + + • + + * + + **** / \ <+ + *> <+ + <**** V vA ++++ A V ++++ North <+ * *> ****> I + * * **** + * * v G/C= .267 G/C= . 121 G/C= .306 G/C= . 107 G= 21.3 G= 9.7" G= 24.51 G= 8.5" Y+R= 4.07 Y+R= 4 .0" Y+R= 4.07 Y+R= 4 .0" OFF= .0% OFF=31.7% OFF=48.7 OFF=84 .3% C= 80 sec G= 64.0 sec = 80.0% Y116.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% MVMT TOTALS N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Int Param:Units RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total AdjVol: vph 42 223 204 210 28 17 29 155 12 12 25 49 1006 Wid/Ln:ft/# 0/q 24/2 12/1 0/0 12/1 12%1 0/0 24/2 12/1 0/0 12/1 24/2 g/C Rqd@C:% 0i 11 18 0 20 4 0 8 2 0 5 4 g/C Used: % 01 45 28 0 32 32 0 13 13 0 12 12 SV @E: vph Q 1553 464 0 516 522 0 494 121 0 209 431 4310 Svc Lvl:LOS B+ C+ B B C C+ C C B Deg Sat:v/c .00 . 17 .44 .00 .46 .03 .00 .37 .09 .00 . 17 . 11 .32 Avg Del:s/v .0 13.3 25.6 .0 23.7 18 9 .0 32 .3 31.6 .0 32 .8 31.8 23 .7 Tot Del:min 0 15 22 0 24 1 0 25 2 0 5 6 100 # Stops:veh 0 39 42 0 48 3 0 42 3 0 8 11 196 Max Que:veh 0 6 7 0 7 1 0 7 0 0 1 2 31 Max Que: ft 01 84 170 0 182 35 0 89 25 0 36 25 182 APPR TOTALS i Int Param:Units N IApproach E Approach S Approach W Approach Total AdjVol: vph 469 255 196 86 1006 Svc Lv1:LOS 1 B B C C B Deg Sat:v/c .29 .43 .35 . 14 .32 Avg Del:s/v 18.7 23.4 32 .3 32 .2 23.7 Tot Del:min 37 25 27 11 100 # Stops:veh 81 51 45 19 196 Max Que:veh 13 8 j 7 3 31 Max Que: ft 170 182 89 36 182 .6-i I South 405 Place 12/27/99 16th Street SW/Oaksdale Avenue SW 14 : 19 : 14 Current P.M. Peak Hour File JCR-C1P SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) .32 Vehicle Delay 14 .8 Level of Service B Sq 27 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I Phase 4 I **/** + + * + + + + * + + **r* / \ <+ + *> <+ + <** v v ++f+ A v ++++ North , <+ * *> ****> I + * * **** * * v G/C= .267 G/C= . 121 G/C= .306 G/C= . 107 G= 21.3" G= 9.7" G= 24 .5r G= 8.5" Y+R= 4 .0" Y+R= 4 .0" Y+R= 4.Oj' Y+R= 4 .0" OFF= .0% OFF=31.7% OFF=48.7% OFF=84 .3% C= 80 sec G= 64 .0 sec = 80.0% YL16.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% Lane (Width/ l g/C I rT4h) Ratel Adj I l HCM I L l90% Maxl Group Lanes Regd Used @E Volume v/c Delay S Queue N Approach _. 11.6 B LT+RTI 12/1 . 175 .279 l 1380 l IN l 204 l .440 l 15.8 l *C+l 170 ftl S Approach 20 .6 C LT+RTI 12/1 .018 . 133 I 374 l ]21 I 182 I .092 I 19.7 l *g„.. 1 25 ftl E Approach - 14 .4 B LT+RTI 12/1 l .036 l .318 I 442 I gH l 217 I .033 I 12 . 1 l *B l 125 ftl W Approach 20.4 C LT+RTI 24/2 .038 . 119 297 1 231 49 I . 114 1 20.3 l *C I 32 ftl South 405 Place 12/27/99 16th Street SW/Oaksdale Avenue SW 14 :24 : 14 Year 2001 A.M. Peak Hour Without Project File JCR-H1A SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD LOSTTIME 3.0 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES 3.0 .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS 1 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES I NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 I1 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 25 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS , RT TH LT . RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 143 191 263 169 96 28 18 68 4 4 64 17 WIDTHS .0 24 .0 12 .0 .0 121.0 12.0 .0 24 .0 12.0 .0 12 .0 24 .0 LANES 0 2 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 2 UTILIZATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS 3.0 2 .0 5.0 21.0 21.0 4 .0 12 .0 12 .0 .0 .0 .0 6.0 PEAKHOURFACTORS .95 .95 .95 .89 .89 .89 .71 .71 .71 .83 .83 .83 ARRIVALTYPES ! 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES REQCLEARANCES 4 .0 4.0 4.0 4.0 41.0 4.0 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5 .0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5. 0 5.0 5.0 5. 0 5. 0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NSTOPFACTORS I1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS ; 0 3419 1693 0 1519 1736 0 3288 906 0 1883 3406 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 27 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET .00 1 CYCLES 80 110 10 PEDTIME .0 0 GREENTIMES 23. 15 7.39 25.04 .42 YELLOWTIMES 4 .00 4 .00 4.00 4 .00 CRITICALS 3 8 5 11 EXCESS 0 f (t, • South 405 Place 12/27/99 16th Street SW/Oaksdale Avenue SW 14 :23:45 Year 2001 A.M. Peak Hour Without Project File JCR-H1A SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4 ] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 27 1 Phase 1 Phase 2 I Phase 3 1 Phase 4 **/** + + * 1 + + A • + + * + + **** / \ <+ + *> <+ + <**** v v ++++ A A v ++++ North <+ * *> ****> + * * **** + * * v G/C= .289 G/C= .092 G/C= .313 G/C= . 105 G= 23. 17 G= 7.4" G= 25.0' G= 8.4" Y+R= 4 .0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4 .07 Y+R= 4 .0" OFF= .0% OFF=33.9% OFF=48 .2% OFF=84 .5% C= 80 sec 1 G= 64 .0 sec = 80.0% YL16.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = . 0% MVMT TOTALS N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Int Param:Units RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total AdjVol: vph 159 211 277 162 108 31 26 101 6 5 77 21 1184 Wid/Ln:ft/# 0/0 24/2 12/1 0/0 12/1 12%1 0/0 24/2 12/1 0/0 12/1 24/2 g/C Rqd@C:% 0 15 22 0 23 5 0.. 7 2 0 8 3 g/C Used: % 0 44 30 0 33 33 0 10 10 0 12 12 SV @E: vph 0 1519 511 0 494 565 0 345 84 0 215 401 4134 Svc Lvl:LOS B+ C+ C+ B C C C C B Deg Sat:v/c .00 .24 .54 .00 .55 .05 .00 .37 . 06 .00 .37 .05 .40 Avg Del:s/v .0 14 .2 25 .7 .0 24 .8 18.7 .0 34 .3 33 .4 .0 34 .7 31.5 23 .4 Tot Del:min 0 22 30 0 28 - 2 0 18 1 0 12 3 116 # Stops:veh 0 58 . 58 0 55 5 0 30 1 0 19 5 231 Max Que:veh 0 9 9 0 8 1 0 5 0 0 3 1 36 Max Que: ft 0 116 221 0 219 25 0 68 25 0 80 25 221 APPR TOTALS Int Param:Units N !Approach E Approach) S Approach W Approach Total AdjVol: vph 647 301 133 103 1184 Svc Lvl:LOS B . B C C , ,B Deg Sat:v/c .37 .50 .35 .30 .40 Avg Del:s/v 19 . 1 24 .2 34 .3 34 . 0 23 .4 Tot Del:min 52 30 19 15 116 # Stops:veh 116 60 31 24 231 Max Que:veh 18 9 5 4 36 Max Que: ft 221 219 68 80 221 South 405 Place 12/27/99 16th Street SW/Oaksdale Avenue SW 14 :23:37 Year 2001 A.M. Peak Hour Without Project File JCR-H1A SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) .40 Vehicle Delay 14 .6 Level of Service B Sq 27 I Phase 1 Phase 2 I Phase 3 1 Phase 4 I **/** + + * + + A + + * + + **** / <+ + *> <+ + <**** v v A ++4+ " v ++++ North <+ * *> ****> I + * * **** + * * V G/C= .289 G/C= .092 G/C= .313 G/C= . 105 G= 23. 1'i G= 7 .4" G= 25.0 G= 8.4" Y+R= 4.0'i Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4 .0r Y+R= 4 .0" OFF= .0% OFF=33.9% OFF=48.2% OFF=84.5% C= 80 sec G= 64 .0 sec = 80.0% Y=16.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = . 0% ILane (Width/ ' g/C I Service Ratel Adj I I HCM I L 90% Max Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume v/c Delay S Queue N Approach 12.0 B THI LT+RTI 12/1 .216 l .302 1429 I1.7 I 2707 I .542 I 16.0 l *C+ I 221 ftl S Approach 21.8 C LT+RTI 12%1 .All 017 1 . 105 l 247 l 384 I 126 l .063 I 20.8 1 *C I 25 ftl E Approach . 14 .9 B LT+RTI 12/1 l .049 I .326 I 485 I 565 I 2301 I .055 I 12 .0 I *B+ I 225 ftl W Approach 21.3 C LT+RTI 24/2 it .025 l . 118 I 272 I 401 I 21 I .052 I 20.2 I *C I 25 ftI South 405 Place 12/27/99 16th Street SW/Oaksdale Avenue SW 14 :27 :47 Year 2001 P.M. Peak Hour Without Project File JCR-H1P SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD LOSTTIME 3.0 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES 3.0 .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 1 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 25 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 24 127 194 203 22 10 19 90 7 9 24 37 WIDTHS .0 24.0 12.0 .0 12 .0 12.0 .0 24.0 12 .0 .0 12 .0 24 .0 LANES 0 2 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 2 UTILIZATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS .0 7 .0 7 .0 .0 10 .0 10.0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 PEAKHOURFACTORS .58 .58 .92 .82 .i75 .58 .64 .59 .58 .75 .91 .75 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES REQCLEARANCES 4 .0 4 .0 4.0 4 .0 4.0 4 .0 4.0 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5. 0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5 .0 5.0 5 .0 5 .0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 NSTOPFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 0 3451 1662 0 1623 1641 0 3707 972 0 1810 3610 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 27 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET .00 1 CYCLES 80 110 10 PEDTIME .0 0 GREENTIMES 21.38 9.74 24 .53 8.35 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4 .00 4.00 4 .00 CRITICALS 3 8 5 11 EXCESS 0 II , /r South 405 Place 12/27/99 16th Street SW/Oaksdale Avenue SW 14 :26 :49 Year 2001 P.M. Pak Hour Without Project File JCR-H1P SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 27 f Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 1 Phase 4 **/** + + * + + A • + + * + + **** / \ <+ + *> <+ + <**** v v ++4 A v ++++ North <+ * *> ****> 1 . + * * **** + * * v G/C= .267 G/C= . 122 G/C= .307 G/C= . 104 G= 21.47 G= 9.7" G= 24.5r G= 8.3" Y+R= 4.07 Y+R= 4 .0" Y+R= 4.0i' Y+R= 4 .0" OFF= .0% OFF=31.7% OFF=48.9% OFF=84 . 6% C= 80 sec G= 64 .0 sec = 80.0% Y1=16.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% MVMT TOTALS N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Int Param:Units RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total AdjVol: vph 43 230 211 217 29 . 17 31 161 12 12 26 50 1039 Wid/Ln:ft/# 0/0 24/2 12/1 0/0 12/1 121/1 0/0 24/2 12/1 0/0 12/1 24/2 g/C Rqd@C:% 0 12 18 0 20 4 0 9 2 0 5 4 g/C Used: % 0 45 28 0 32 32 . 0 13 13 0 12 12 SV @E: vph 0 1558 465 0 518 524 0 498 120 0 203 422 4308 Svc Lvl:LOS B+ , C+ B B C C+ C C B Deg Sat:v/c .00 . 17 .45 .00 .47 .03 .00 .39 .09 .00 . 18 . 12 .34 Avg Del:s/v .0 13.3 25.7 .0 23.8 18.9 .0 32 .3 31.5 .0 33. 1 32 .0 23.8 Tot Del:min 0 15 23 0 24 1 0 26 2 0 5 7 103 #. Stops:veh 0 41 44 0 49 3 0 44 3 0 9 11 204 Max Que:veh 0 7 7 0 7 1 0 7 0 0 1 2 32 Max Que: ft 0 86 176 0 187 25 0 92 25 0 37 25 187 1 APPR TOTALS Int Param:Units NiApproach E Approach S Approach W Approach Total AdjVol: vph 484 263 . 204 88 1039 Svc Lvl:LOS B B C C B Deg Sat:v/c .30 .45 .37 . 14 .34 Avg Del:s/v 18.7 23.5 32 .3 32 .5 23.8 Tot Del:min 38 25 28 12 103 # Stops:veh 85 52 47 20 204 Max Que:veh 14 8 7 3 32 Max Que: ft 176 - 187 92 37 187 • I South 405 Place 12/27/99 16th Street SW/Oaksdale Avenue SW 14 :26:41 Year 2001 P.M. Peak Hour Without Project File JCR-H1P SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Capacity Analysis Summary , Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) .34 Vehicle Delay 14.9 Level of Service B 1 Sq 27 1 Phase 1 . 1 Phase 2 I Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 **/** + + * I + + A + + * + + **** /� \ <+ + *> <+ + <**1 v I v ++ + v ++++ North <+ * *> ****> 1 + * * **** I + * * v G/C= .267 G/C= . 122 G/C= .307 G/C= . 104 G= 21.4" G= 9.7" G= 24.5r G= 8.3" Y+R= 4 .0" Y+R= 4 .0" Y+R= 4.0i' Y+R= 4 .0" OFF= .0% OFF=31.7% OFF=48.9% OFF=84 .6% C= 80 sec G= 64 .0 sec = 80 .0% YL16. 0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% lLane (Width/ l I I I l ITerlg/CerviceRateAdj HCM LGroup LanesRegdUsed @C (vph) @E Volume v/c Delay S N Approach 11.7 B I LT+RTI 12/1 I . 117 180 I .280 11381 l 1465 I 211 I .454 I 15.9 I *C+ I 176 ftI S Approach 20.6 . 0 ILT+RTI 12/1 .018 I . 134 I 374 I 120 I 112 I .092 I 19.6 l *M N ftl E Approach 14 .5 B ILT+RTI 12/1 I .036 l .319 I 444 I WI l 217 1 .032 I 12 . 1 I *B 1125 ftI W Approach i 20.5 C ILT+RTI 24/2 I .038 l . 117 I 289 I . 422 I 50 I . 118 I 20 .4 I *C I 25 fti III .-0-/ South 405 Place 12/27/99 16th Street SW/Oaksdale Avenue SW 14 :31:35 Year 2001 A.M. Peak Hour With Project File JCR-P1A SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Summary of Parameter Values I Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD LOSTTIME 3.0 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES 3.0 .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 10 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES . 0 10 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 11 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 25 0 0 Movement ParamIeters MOVLABELS -- RT TH LT, . RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 143 191 299 174 96 28 18 68 4 4 64 17 WIDTHS .0 24.0 12.0 .0 121.0 12 .0 .0 24 .0 12 .0 .0 12 .0 24 .0 LANES 0 .,. 2 1 0 11 1 0 2 1 0 1 2 UTILIZATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS -3.0 2 .0 5.0 21.0 21.0 4 .0 12 .0 12 .0 .0 .0 .0 6.0 PEAKHOURFACTORS .95 .95 .95 .89 .89 .89 .71 .71 .71 .83 .83 .83 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES REQCLEARANCES 4 .0 4 .0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5. 0 5 .0 5.0 5.0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NSTOPFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.;00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 0 3419 1693 0 15i5 1736 0 3288 945 0 1883 3406 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 27 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET .00 1 CYCLES 80 110 10 PEDTIME .0 0 GREENTIMES 24.55 7 .04 24.38 8.03 YELLOWTIMES 4 .00 4.00 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 3 8 5 11 EXCESS 0 l/� South 405 Place i 12/27/99 16th Street SW/Oaksdale Avenue SW 14 :31:05 Year 2001 A.M. Peak Hour With Project File JCR-P1A I SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 27 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 I Phase 4 **/** + + * + + " + + * ! + + **�** / <+ + *> <+ + <**II** v v ++4-+ A v ++++ North <+ * *> ****> + * * **** + * * v G/C= .307 G/C= .088 G/C= .3015 G/C= . 100 G= 24 .57 G= 7.0" G= 24 .4" G= 8.0" Y+R= 4 .07 Y+R= 4 .0" Y+R= 4 .0" Y+R= 4 .0" OFF= .0% OFF=35.7% OFF=49.5�5 OFF=85.0% C= 80 sec ' G= 64.0 sec = 80.0% Y==16.0 sec = 20 .0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% MVMT TOTALS N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Int Param:Units RT TH LT RT TH ELT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total AdjVol: vph 159 211 315 167 108 11 26 101 6 5 77 21 1227 Wid/Ln:ft/# 0/0 24/2 12/1 0/0 12/1 12/1 0/0 24/2 12/1 0/0 12/1 24/2 g/C Rqd@C:% 0 15 24 0 24 5 0 7 2 0 8 3 g/C Used: % 0 46 32 0 32 32 0 10 10 0 11 11 SV @E: vph 0 1564 541 0 481 551 0 330 84 0 204 384 4139 Svc Lvl:LOS B+ C+ C+ B C C C C B Deg Sat:v/c .00 .24 .58 .00 .57 .p6 .00 .38 .06 .00 .39 .05 .42 AvgDel:s/v .0 13.5 25.4 .0 25.7 1912. .0 34 .7 33. 6 .0 35.2 31.9 23.5 Tot Del:min 0 21 33 0 29 2 0 18 1 0 12 3 119 # Stops:veh 0 56 66 0 57 5 0 30 1 0 19 5 239 Max Que:veh 0 9 10 0 8 1 0 5 0. 0 3 1 37 Max Que: ft 0 113 245 0 226 25 0 68 25 0 81 25 245 APPR TOTALS Int Param:Units N ;Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Total AdjVol: vph 685 306 133 103 1227 Svc Lvl:LOS B C+ r C C B Deg Sat:v/c .40 .52 .37 .32 .42 Avg Del:s/v 19.0 25.0 34 .7 34.5 23 .5 Tot Del:min 54 31 19 15 119 # Stops:veh 122 62 31 24 239 Max Que:veh 19 9 5 4 37 Max Que: ft 245 226 68 81 245 ...' l • South 405 Place 12/27/99 16th Street SW/Oaksdale Avenue SW 14 :30:58 Year 2001 A.M. Peak Hour With Project File JCR-P1A SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) .42 Vehicle Delay 14.7 Level of Service B Sq 27 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 I Phase 3 1 Phase 4 **/** . + + * + + + + * ' + + **** / \ <+ *> ++ ' < + <** v ! v ++-+ A A v ++++ North <+ * *> ****> I + * * **** + * * v G/C= .307 G/C= .088 G/C= .34 G/C= . 100 G= 24 .5" G= 7 .0" G= 24.47 G= 8.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4 .0" Y+R= 4 .07 Y+R= 4 .0" OFF= .0% OFF=35.7% OFF=49.5% , OFF=85.0% C= 80 sec G= 64.0 sec = 80.0% Y=16 .0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = . 0% 1 o I Lane (Width/ I! g/C I Service tatel Adj I I HCM I L I90% Maxl Group Lanes ' Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume v/c Delay S Queue N Approach 11.9 B LT+RTI 12/1 .238 l .319 11461 I 1 41 I 315 I .582 I 15.9 l *C+ I 245 ftl S Approach 22 . 1 C LT+RTI 12/1 I .017 I . 101 I 247 I 3840 I 126 I .063 I 21.0 1 *2 I N ftI E Approach 15.6 C+ ILT+RTI 12/1 I .049 I .317 I 470 I 451 I 231 I .056 I 12.3 I *B+ I 225 ftl W Approach 21.6 C ILT+RTI 24/2 I .025 I . 113 I 256 I g2/ I 21 I .055 I 20.5 I *C I 25 ftl L South 405 Place 12/27/99 16th Street SW/Oaksdale Avenue SW 14 :35:06 Year 200.1 P.M. Peak Hour With Project File JCR-P1P SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD LOSTTIME 3.0 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES 3.0 .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES . . 0 0 . 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 1 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 2 5 . 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT }TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 24 127 201 23222 10 19 90 7 9 24 37 WIDTHS .0 24.0 12 .0 .0 12I.0 12.0 .0 24 .0 12.0 .0 12 .0 24 .0 LANES 0 2 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 2 UTILIZATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS .0 7.0 7 .0 .0 10.0 10.0 . 0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 PEAKHOURFACTORS .58 .58 .92 .82 . 75 .58 .64 .59 .58 .75 .91 .75 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES REQCLEARANCES 4 .0 4.0 4 .0 4.0 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 4.0 4.0 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 MINIMUMS 5 .0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5 .0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5 .0 5.0 IDEALSATFLOWS ' 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NSTOPFACTORS 11.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 0 3451 1662 0 1621 1641 0 3707 972 0 1810 3610 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 27 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET .00 1 CYCLES 80 110 10 PEDTIME .0 0 GREENTIMES 20.87 9.25 25.96 7 .92 YELLOWTIMES 4 .00 4 .00 4 .00 4 .00 CRITICALS 3 8 5 i11 EXCESS 0 South 405 Place 12/27/99 16th Street SW/Oaksdale Avenue SW 14 :34 :34 Year 2001 P.M. Peak Hour With Project File JCR-P1P SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 27 1 Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 1 Phase 4 **/** + + * + + A • + + * + + **** / \ <+ + *> <+ + <**** V V ++IF+ n A v ++++ North <+ * *> ****> 1 + * * **** + * * v G/C= .261 G/C= . 116 G/C= .325 G/C= .099 G= 20.9j G= 9.3" G= 26 ..0 ' G= 7.9" Y+R= 4 .0'i Y+R= 4 .0" Y+R= 4 .0 ' Y+R= 4 .0" OFF= .0% OFF=31. 1% OFF=47 .6% OFF=85. 1% C= 80 sec G= 64 .0 sec = 80.0% YI=16.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = . .0% MVMT TOTALS N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Int Param:Units RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total AdjVol: vph 43 230 218 252 29 i17 31 161 12 12. 26 50 1081 Wid/Ln:ft/# 0/0 24/2 12/1 0/0 12/1 12V1 0/0 24/2 12/1 0/0 12/1 24/2 g/C Rqd@C:% 0 12 18 0 23 14 0 9 2 0 5 4 g/C Used: % 0 44 27 0 34 34 , 0 13 13 0 11 11 SV @E: vph 0 1515 454 0 546 513 0 475 114 0 194 403 4254 Svc Lvl:LOS B+ C+ B ) C C+ C C C+ Deg Sat:v/c .00 . 18 .48 .00 .51 .03 .00 .40 . 10 .00 . 19 . 12 .36 Avg Del:s/v .0 13.9 26.4 .0 23.4 17 .9 .0 32.8 32. 1 .0 33.5 32 .4 24.0 Tot Del:min 0 16 24 0 27 1 0 26 2 0 5 7 108 # Stops:veh 0 42 46 0 56 3 0 44 . 3 0 9 11 214 Max Que:veh 0 7 7 0 8 1 0 7 0 0 2 2 34 Max Que: ft 0 88 183 0 208 25 0 93 25 0 38 25 208 APPR TOTALS . Int Param:Units N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach . Total AdjVol: vph I 491 298 204 88 1081 Svc Lvl:LOS 1 B .- B C C C+ Deg Sat:v/c .31 .49 .39 . 15 .36 Avg Del:s/v 19.4 23. 1 32 .8 32 .9 24 .0 Tot Del:min 40 28 28 12 108 # Stops:veh 1 88 59 47 20 214 Max Que:veh 14 9 7 4 34 Max Que: ft 183 208 93 38 208 / IU'/ South 405 Place 12/27/99 16th Street SW/Oaksdale Avenue SW 14 :34 :22 Year 2001 P.M. Peak Hour With Project File JCR-P1P SIGNAL94/TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) .36 Vehicle Delay 15. 1 Level of Service C+ Sq 27 1 Phase 1 I Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 **/** r + + * + + + + * + + **I* / \ <+ *> + ++ < <** v v ++++ A v ++++ North <+ * *> ****> + * * **** + * * v G/C= .261 G/C= . 116 G/C= .325 G/C= .099 G= 20.9" G= 9.3" G= 26.0" G= 7.9" Y+R= 4 .0" Y+R= 4 .0" Y+R= 4 .0" Y+R= 4 .0" OFF= .0% OFF=31. 1% OFF=47 .6% OFF=85. 1% C= 80 sec G= 64.0 sec = 80.0% Y=16.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% Lane / IC Service ate Ad ' HCM L I Group 1141-cainlei sl Reqdg Used I @C (vph) @E Volume v/c I Delay I S 198tlerl N Approach 12.2 B ILT+RTI 12/1 l . 184 l .273 11370 l 1454 I 218 I .480 I 16 .3 l *C+ l Al ftl S Approach 21.0 C ILT+RTI 12/1 Il .018 I . 128 I 370 I 114 I 112 I .096 I 19..9 l *M 25 ftl E Approach 14 .3 B lLT+RTI 12/1 I .036 I .337 I 476 I 553 I 217 I :Si? I 11.5 l *B 1 232 ftl W Approach 20.8 C lLT+RTI 24/2 I .038 l . 111 I 270 l 403 l 50 I . 124 I 20.7 I *C l 25 ftl / i South 405 Place 12/27/99 16th Street SW/Lind Avenue SW 14 :47 :09 Current A.M. Peak Hour File JCR-C2A SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD LOSTTIME 3.0 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES -3.0 .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NO E NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 1 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 ' 5 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 141 381 150 140 119 7 2 243 92 83 69 50 WIDTHS .0 24.0 12.0 .0 2400 12.0 .0 24 .0 12 .0 .0 24.0 12 .0 LANES 0 2 1 0 12 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 UTILIZATIONS ! .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS 1 2.0 5.0 .0 9.0 180 14 .0 .0 23.0 11.0 6.0 4 . 0 4 .0 PEAKHOURFACTORS .94 .94 .94 .91 .91 .91 .87 .87 .87 .88 .88 .88 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 13 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES REQCLEARANCES 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 40 4 .0 4.0 4 .0 4 .0 4.0 4 .0 4 .0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 50 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 IDEALSATFLOWS , 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 11.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.20 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NSTOPFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 GROUPTYPES 'NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 0 3545 1832 0 3099 1583 0 3090 1626 0 3319 1736 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 55 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET .00 1 CYCLES 1 90 110 10 PEDTIME .0 0 GREENTIMES 18.58 .00 26.42 1 .46 .00 17 .54 YELLOWTIMES 4 .00 .00 4.00 4.00 .00 4 .00 CRITICALS 3 0 2 12 0 5 EXCESS 0 {1 1 G1' 1 , • South 405 Place 12/27/99 16th Street SW/Lind Avenue SW 14 :46 :30 Current A.M. Peak Hour File JCR-C2A SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 55 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 I Phase 3 Phase 4 1 Phase 5 I Phase 6 * + + + * * A * + + + * * ++++ **** /1 \ *> <+ + +> <* * <++++ <**** v v ++++ ++++ **** v v North <+ + �+> ++++> + + �+ ++++ + + + v G/C= .206 G/C= .000 G/C= .294 G/C= . 127 G/C= .000 G/C= . 195 G= 18.6" G= .0" G= 26.4" G= 11.5" G= .0" G= 17 .5" Y+R= 4 .0" Y+R= .0" Y+R= 4 .0" Y+R= 4 .0" Y+R= .0" Y+R= 4 .0" OFF= .0% OFF=25. 1% OFF=25. 1% OFF=58.9% OFF=76. 1% OFF=76. 1% C= 90 sec G= 74 .0 sec = 82.2% Y=16.0 sec = 17.8% Ped= . 0 sec = .0% MVMT TOTALS N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Int Param:Units RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total AdjVol: vph 158 425 160 132 138 8 2 293 106 99 82 57 1660 Wid/Ln:ft/# 0/0 24/2 12/1 0/0 24/2 12/1 0/0 24/2 12/1 0/0 24/2 12/1 g/C Rqd@C:% 0 21 15 0 14 8 0 15 13 0 11 10 g/C Used: % 0 30 22 0 21 14 0 30 22 0 21 14 SV @E: vph 0 1080 399 0 639 210 0 942 354 0 684 232 4540 Svc Lvl:LOS C+ C+ C C C+ C+ C+ C C+ Deg Sat:v/c .00 .54 .40 .00 .42 .04 .00 .31 .30 .00 .26 .24 .41 Avg Del:s/v .0 26 .9 31.8 .0 31.9 33.9 .0 24 .7 30.9 .0 30 .6 35 .9 28. 8 Tot Del:min 0 65 21 0 36 1 0 30 14 0 23 9 199 # Stops:veh 0 121 34 0 59 2 0 57 22 0 38 13 346 Max Que:veh 0 20 6 0 11 0 0 10 4 0 7 2 60 Max Que: ft 0 260 156 0 145 25 0 146 111 0 93 63 260 APPR TOTALS Int Param:Units N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Total AdjVol: vph 743 278 401 238 1660 Svc Lvl:LOS C+ C C+ C C+ Deg Sat:v/c .51 .41 .31 .26 .41 Avg Del:s/v 28.0 32 .0 26.3 31. 9 28. 8 Tot Del:min 86 37 44 32 199 # Stops:veh 155 61 79 51 346 Max Que:veh 26 11 14 9 60 Max Que: ft 260 145 146 93 260 South 405 Place 12/27/99 16th Street SW/Lind Avenue SW 14 :46:22 Current A.M. Peak Hour File JCR-C2A SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Capacity Anal sis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) .41 Vehicle Delay 18.3 Level of Service C+ Sq 55 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 Phase 5 I Phase 6 **/** * + + + * * A A * + + + * * ++++ **** I \ *> <+ + +> <* * <++++ <**** v v A ++++ ++++ A **** v v North <+ + +> ++++> 1 + + + ++++ + + 1- v G/C= .206 G/C= .000 G/C= .294 G/C= . 127 G/C= .000 G/C= . 195 G= 18.6" G= .0" G= 26.41' G= 11.5" G= .0" G= 17 .5" Y+R= 4 .0" Y+R= .0" Y+R= 4 .0'' Y+R= 4 .0" Y+R= .0" Y+R= 4 .0" OFF= .0% OFF=25. 1% OFF=25. 1% OFF=58.9% OFF=76. 1% OFF=76. 1% C= 90 sec G= 74 .0 sec = 82.2% Y=16.0 sec = 17 .8% Ped= .0 sec = .0% v(vh) e IVoAdm elI LGnup IWLnhelReqdg/CUsed I v/c I Delay I LS I9Qu eM x I N Approach 17.8 C+ 1 LT+RTI 12/1 I . 152 l .218 l 284 11399 I 160 I .401 I 19.9 I *C+ l 156 ftl S Approach 16.5 C+ 1 LT+RTI 12/1 I . 131 I .2018 I 247 I 354 I 106 I .299 I 19 .2 I C+ I 111 fti E Approach 20.4 C ILT+RTI 12/1 I .075 1 . 138 I 114 I M I 278 I .037 I 21.7 I *C 1125 RI W Approach 20 . 1 C ILT+RTI 12/1 I .097 I . 138 I 127 I 232 I 157 I .237 1 22 .4 1 * + 1 963 fti _.2/./ 1 South 405 Place 12/27/99 16th Street SW/Lind Avenue SW 14 :54 :28 Current P.M. Peak Hour File JCR-C2P SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD LOSTTIME 3.0 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES -3.0 .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES j 1 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 25 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 39 273 143 299 85 9 7 529 89 113 135 231 WIDTHS .0 24 .0 12 .0 .0 2410 12 .0 .0 24 .0 12 .0 .0 24 .0 12 .0 LANES 0 2 1 0 12 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 UTILIZATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 . 00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS 5.0 11.0 6.0 5.0 810 .0 .0 5 . 0 10.0 17 .0 10 .0 1.0 PEAKHOURFACTORS .92 .92 .92 .93 .93 .93 . 91 .91 .91 .90 .90 .90 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES REQCLEARANCES 4 .0 4 .0 4.0 4 .0 410 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 510 5.0 5 . 0 5. 0 5 .0 5 .0 5 .0 5 .0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NSTOPFACTORS 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 . 00 1.00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 0 3426 1728 0 3183 1805 0 3614 1641 0 3127 1787 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 55 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET .00 1 CYCLES 90 110 10 PEDTIME .0 0 GREENTIMES 14 .88 .00 21.34 20.26 .00 17 .52 YELLOWTIMES 4 .00 .00 4 .00 4 .00 .00 4 .00 CRITICALS 3 0 8 12 0 5 EXCESS 0 2`L� South 405 Place ' 12/27/99 16th Street SW/Lind Avenue SW 14 :54 :03 Current P.M. Peak Hour File JCR-C2P 1 SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 55 1 Phase 11 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 Phase 5 1 Phases6 1 **/** * , + + + + + A * + + + + + I ++++ **** / \ *> <+ + +> <+ + <++++ <**** v v A ++++ ++++ A **** V v North <+ * le> ++++> + * le ++++ + * r v G/C= . 165 G/C= .000 G/C= 235 G/C= .225 G/C= .000 G/C= . 195 G= 14 .9" G= .0" G= 21.3+' G= 20.3" • G= .0" G= 17 .5" Y+R= 4 .0" Y+R= .0" Y+R= 4 .0r Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= .0" Y+R= 4 .0" OFF= .0% OFF=21.0% OFF=21.0% OFF=49. 1% OFF=76. 1% OFF=76. 1% C= 90 sec G= 74 .0 sec = 82.2% YL16.0 sec = 17 .8% P.ed= .0 sec = .0% MVMT TOTALS N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Int Param:Units RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total AdjVol: vph 44 312 155 310 95 ;10 8 610 98 132 158 257 2189 Wid/Ln:ft/# 0/0 24/2 12/1 0/0 24/2 12/1 0/0 24/2 12/1 0/0 24/2 12/1 g/C Rqd@C:% 0 16 16 0 18 18 0 22 13 0 15 21 g/C Used: % 0 25 18 0 21 24 0 25 18 0 21 24 SV @E: vph 0 850 301 0 655 426 0 897 286 . 0 644 422 4481 Svc Lvl:LOS C+ . C C C+ C C C C C Deg Sat:v/c .00 .42 .51 .00 .62 .02 .00 .69 .34 .00 .45 .61 .56 Avg Del:s/v .0 29. 1 36.3 .0 34 . 1 26.5 .0 32 .3 34 .2 .0 32.2 33 .8 32 .6 Tot Del:min 0 . 43 23 0 57 1 0 83 14 0 39 36 296 # Stops:veh 0 75 35 0 92 2 0 140 21 0 63 57 485 Max Que:veh 0 13 6 0 16 0 0 23 4 0 12 10 84 Max Que: ft 0 178 165 0 208 25 0 299 107 0 155 247 299 I APPR TOTALS Int Param:Units N' Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Total AdjVol: vph 511 • 415 716 547 2189 Svc Lvl:LOS C+ C C C C Deg Sat:v/c .45 .60 . 64 .52 .56 Avg Del:s/v 31.3 33 .9 32.6 33.0 32 . 6 Tot Del:min 66 58 97 75 296 # Stops:veh 110 94 161 120 485 Max Que:veh , 19 16 27 22 84 Max Que: ft ! 178 . , 208 299 247 .299 i li?/ South 405 Place 12/27/99 16th Street SW/Lind Avenue SW 14 :53:56 Current P.M. Peak Hour File JCR-C2P SIGNAL94/TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - Capacity Anal sis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) .56 Vehicle Delay 21. 1 Level of Service C Sq 55 1 Phase 11 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 Phase 5 1 Phase 6 **/** * + + + + + " A * + + + + + ++++ **** / \ *> <+ + +> <+ + <++++ <**** v v ++++ ++++ **** v v North <+ * *> ++++> + * * ++++ + * * G/C= . 165 G/C= .000 G/C= .237 G/C= .225 G/C= .000 G/C= . 195 G= 14.97 G= .0" G= 21.3" G= 20.3" G= .0" G= 17 .5" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= .0" Y+R= 4 .0" Y+R= 4 .0" Y+R= .0" Y+R= 4 .0" OFF= .0% OFF=21.0% OFF=21.0% OFF=49. 1% OFF=76. 1% OFF=76 . 1% C= 90 sec G= 74.0 sec = 82.2% YL-16.0 sec = 17.8% Ped= .0 sec = .0% Lane (Width/ I g/C IerTWInl iceHCMILI90% MaxlGoup Lanes ReqdUsed @C vph) Voe v/c Delay S Queue N Approach.-- 19 .8 C+ LT+RTI 12/1 . 155 I . 176 I 192 ( 3001 I 155 I .508 I 22.8 ( *C+ I 165 ftl S Approach 21.4 C T RT112/1 .225 .2 I 78 I 876 I 6g I .63 I 211.2 1 * ( 299 ft ftI E Approach 22 .2 C LT+RTI 12/1 .075 .236 I 314 I 426 I 410 I .023 17 . 1 1 * +1 225 ftI W Approach 21. 1 C LT+RTI 12/1 .208 .236 I 310 I 422 I 2507 1 .609 I 21.6 I *C 1247 ftI • 2�i • South 405 Place 12/27/99 16th Street SW/Lind Avenue SW 14 :58:08 Year 2001 A.M. Peak Hour Without Project File JCR-H2A SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD LOSTTIME 1 3.0 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES -3.0 .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 1 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 25 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT . . RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 146 393 155 145 123 7 2 251 95 86 71 52 WIDTHS ! .0 24 .0 12 .0 .0 24.0 12 .0 .0 24.0 12.0 .0 24.0 12 .0 LANES 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 . 0 2 1 UTILIZATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS 2 .0 5.0 .0 9.0 18.0 14.0 .0 23.0 11.0 6.0 4 .0 4 .0 PEAKHOURFACTORS .94 .94 .94 .91 .91 .91 .87 .87 .87 .88 .88 .88 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES REQCLEARANCES 4 .0 4.0 4.0 4 .0 4 .0 4.0 . 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5. 0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 11.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NSTOPFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 0 3545 1832 0 3038 1583 0 3090 1626 0 3319 1736 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 55 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET .00 1 CYCLES 90 110 10 PEDTIME .0 0 . GREENTIMES 18.58 .00 26.42 11.46 .00 17 .54 YELLOWTIMES 4 .00 .00 4 .00 4 .00 .00 4 .00 CRITICALS 3 .0 2 12 0 .. .5 . EXCESS 0 South 405 Place 12/27/99 16th Street SW/Lind Avenue SW 14 :57 : 11 Year 2001 A.M. Peak Hour Without Project File JCR-H2A SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] '- Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 55 I Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 Phase 5 Phase 6 **/** * + + + / * * A A * + + + * * ++++ **** / \ *> <+ + +> <* * <++++ <**** v v ++++ ++++ A **** V v North <+ + +> ++++> + + + ++++ + I + + v G/C= .206 G/C= .000 G/C= .294 G/C= . 127 G/C= .000 G/C= . 195 G= 18.6" G= .0" G= 26.41' G= 11.5" G= .0" G= 17 .5" Y+R= 4 .0" Y+R= .0" Y+R= 4 .0i' Y+R= 4 .0" Y+R= .0" Y+R= 4 .0" OFF= .0% OFF=25. 1% OFF=25. 1% OFF=58.9% OFF=76. 1% OFF=76. 1% 1 C= 90 sec G= 74 .0 sec = 82 .2% YL16.0 sec = 17.8% Ped= .0 sec = .0% MVMT TOTALS N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Int Param:Units RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total AdjVol: vph 163 439 165 138 142 8 2 304 109 103 85 59 1717 Wid/Ln:ft/# 0/0 24/2 12/1 0/0 24/2 12/1 0/0 24/2 12/1 0/0 24/2 12/1 g/C Rqd@C: % 0 22 15 0 15 18 0 16 13 0 11 10 g/C Used: % 0 30 22 0 21 14 0 30 22 0 21 14 SV @E: vph 0 1080 399 0 638 210 0 941 354 0 684 232 4538 Svc Lvl:LOS C+ C+ C C C+ C+ C+ C C+ Deg Sat:v/c .00 .56 .41 .00 .44 P4 .00 .32 .31 .00 .28 .25 .42 Avg Del:s/v .0 27 . 1 32 .0 .0 32 . 1 331.9 .0 24 .8 31.0 .0 30.7 36 .0 29 .0 Tot Del:min 0 68 22 0 37 1 0 32 14 0 24 9 207 # Stops:veh 0 126 35 0 61 2 0 59 23 0 40 13 359 Max Que:veh 0 21 6 0 11 0 0 11 4 0 7 3 63 Max Que: ft 0 268 161 0 150 ?5 0 151 114 0 96 65 268 - APPR TOTALS Int Param:Units N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Total AdjVol: vph 767 288 L 415 247 1717 Svc Lvl:LOS C+ C C+ C C+ Deg Sat:v/c .53 .43 .32 .27 .42 Avg Del:s/v 28.2 32 .2 26.4 32 . 0 29.0 Tot Del:min 90 38 46 33 207 # Stops:veh 161 63 82 53 359 Max Que:veh 27 11 15 10 63 Max Que: ft 268 150 151 96 268 i / South 405 Place 12/27/99 16th Street SW/Lind Avenue SW 14 :57 :04 Year 2001 A.M. Peak Hour Without Project File JCR-H2A SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) .42 Vehicle Delay 18.4 Level of Service C+ Sq 55 1 Phase 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 Phase 5 I Phase 6 1 **/** * , + + + * * A " * + + + * * ++++ **** / \ *> <+ A. +> <* * <++++ <**** v v " ++++ ++++ A **** v v North <+ + +> ++++> + A. A. ++++ + + L V G/C= .206 G/C= .000 G/C= .294 G/C= . 127 G/C= .000 G/C= . 195 G= 18.6" G= .0" G= 26..41 G= 11.5" G= .0" G= 17 .5" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= .0" Y+R= 4.01' Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= .0" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= .0% OFF=25. 1% OFF=25. 1% OFF=58.9% OFF=76. 1% OFF=76. 1%. C= 90 sec G= 74.0 sec = 82.2% Y=16.0 sec = 17 .8% Ped= .0 sec = .0% Lane (Width/ 1'i g/C I Service Rate1 Adj 1 1 HCM I L ( 90% Max1 Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume v/c Delay S Queue N Approach 18.0 C+ LT+RT1 12/1 1 . 155 1 .218 284 1 1399 1 165 1 .414 1 20.0 14+1 161 ftl S Approach 16 .6 C+ LT+RTI 12/1 11 . 133 .2018 247 ;Z54 109 .308 19.2 ' 1 C+ l 114 ftl E Approach 20.5 C LT+RT1 12/1 1 .075. . 138 1 114 1 210 1 288 1 .037 1 21.7 1 *C 1 125 ftl W Approach 20.2 C 1 LT+RT1 12/1 1i .098 . 138 1 127 1 32 1 159 1 .246 1 22 .5 14+ 1 965 ftl South 405 Place 12/27/9912299 16th Street SW/Lind Avenue SW Year 2001 P.M. Peak Hour Without Project File JCR-H2P SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD LOSTTIME 3.0 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES -3.0 .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES i 0 0 . 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 1 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 25 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT . TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 40 282 148 309 88 9 7 546 92 117 139 239 WIDTHS .0 24 .0 12 .0 .0 24 .0 12.0 .0 24 .0 12 .0 .0 24 .0 12.0 LANES 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 UTILIZATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS 5.0 11.0 6.0 5 .0 8.0 .0 .0 5 .0 10.0 17 .0 10.0 1. 0 PEAKHOURFACTORS .92 .92 .92 .93 .93 .93 .91 .91 .91 .90 .90 .90 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES REQCLEARANCES 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 4.0 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5 .0 5.0 5 .0 5 .0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.0.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 00 DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NSTOPFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 SGROUPTYPES ATURATIONFLOWS NORM 0 3427 10RM 728 NO 0 NORM 1805 NORM NORM 0 3614 1641 NORM 0 0RM NORM 3126 1787 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 55 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET .00 1 0 0 CYCLES 90 110 10 PEDTIME GREENTIMES 14 .88 .00 21.32 20.27 .00 17 .53 YELLOWTIMES 4 .00 .00 4 .00 4 .00 .00 4 .00 CRITICALS 3 0 8 12 0 5 EXCESS 0 South 405 Place ; 12/27/99 16th Street SW/Lind Avenue SW 15:01:02 Year 2001 P.M. Peak Hour Without Project File JCR-H2P . SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 55 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 I Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 Phase 5 I Phase 6 1 **/** * + + + + + * + + + + + ++++ **** / \ *> <+ + +> <+ + <++++ <**** v v ++++ ++++ ^ **** V V North <+ * *> ++++> + 1 * r ++++ + * r v G/C= . 165 G/C= .000 G/C= . .237 G/C= .225 G/C= .000 G/C= . 195 G= 14.9" G= .0" G= 21.3T' G= 20.3" G= .0" G= 17.5" Y+R= 4 .0" Y+R= .0" Y+R= 4 .01' Y+R= 4 .0" Y+R= .0" Y+R= 4 .0" OFF= .0% OFF=21.0% OFF=21.0% OFF=49. 1% OFF=76. 1% OFF=76. 1% C= 90 sec G= 74 .0 sec = 82.2% YL16.0 sec = 17.8% Ped= .0 sec = .0% 1 MVMT TOTALS N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Int Param:Units RTI TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total AdjVol: vph 45 322 161 320 100 10 8 630 101 1.36 162 266 2261 Wid/Ln:ft/# 0/0 24/2 12/1 0/0 24/2 121/1 0/0 24/2 12/1 0/0 24/2 12/1 g/C Rqd@C:% 0 16 16 0 19 18 0 22 13 0 15 21 g/C Used: % 0 25 18 0 21 24 0 25 18 0 21 24 SV @E: vph 0 850 301 0 655 427 0 896 284 0 644 422 4479 Svc Lvl:LOS 1 C+ C C C+ C C C C C Deg Sat:v/c .00 .43 .53 .00 .64 .02 .00 .71 .35 .00 .46 .63 .58 Avg Del:s/v .0 29 .2 36 .6 .0 34 .4 26L5 .0 32 .8 34 .4 .0 32 .3 34 .3 32 .9 Tot Del:min 0 45 25 0 60 1 0 87 14 0 40 38 310 # Stops:veh 0 77 37 0 96 2 0 146 22 0 65 60 505 Max Que:veh 0 14 7 0 17 0 0 24 4 0 12 10 88 Max Que: ft 0 183 172 0 216 25 0 309 110 0 160 255 309 APPR TOTALS Int Param:Units N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Total AdjVol: vph 528 430 739 564 2261 Svc Lvl:LOS C C C C C Deg Sat:v/c 1 .46 .63 .66 .54 .58 Avg Del:s/v 31.5 34 .2 33.0 33.2 32.9 Tot Del:min 70 61 101 78 310 # Stops:veh 114 98 168 125 505 Max Que:veh 21 17 28 22 88 Max Que: ft 183 216 309 255 309 4,q / • South 405 Place 12/27/99 16th Street SW/Lind Avenue SW 15 :00 :54 Year 2001 P.M. Peak Hour Without Project File JCR-H2P SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Capacity Analysis Summary 1 Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) .58 Vehicle Delay 21.4 Level of Service C Sq 55 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 Phase 5 Phase 6 **/** * + + + + + * + + + + + ++++ **** / \ *> <+ + +> <+ + <++++ <**** v v ++++ ++++ A **** V v North <+ * *> ++++> + * * ++++ + * * v G/C= . 165 G/C= .000 G/C= .23 G/C= .225 G/C= .000 G/C= . 195 G= 14.9" G= .0" G= 21.3 ' G= 20.3" G= .0" G= 17 .5" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= .0" Y+R= 4 .0 ' Y+R= 4 .0" Y+R= .0" Y+R= 4 .0" OFF= .0% OFF=21.0% OFF=21.0Ts OFF=49. 1% OFF=76. 1% OFF=76. 1% C= 90 sec G= 74 .0 sec = 82 .2% Y=16.0 sec = 17 .8% Ped= .0 sec = .0% 1 ILane Width/ g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L Group I Lanes Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E IVolumel v/c I Delay I S 19(genx1 N Approach 20.0 C ILT+RTI 12/1 I . 159 I . 176 I .192 I H I 161 I .528 I 23. 1 l *N 172 ftI S Approach 21.8 C RT 4 2 I LT TH+ 1 212/1 I; . 127 I . 176 I 180 I 284 I 101 I .349 I 21.3 I C 11010 RI E Approach 22 .5 C ILT+RTI 12/1 1 .075 I .236 1 315 I '27 I 410 I .023 I 17 .0 . I *C+ I 225 ftI W Approach 21.3 C ILT+RTI 12/1 II .213 I .236 I 310 I 422 I 266 I .630 I 22 . 1 I *C 1255 RI �3 U • 1 y South 405 Place 12/27/99 16th Street SW/Lind Avenue SW 15:04 :25 Year 2001 A.M. Peak Hour With Project File JCR-P2A SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] Summary of Pa ameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD LOSTTIME 1 3.0 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES -3.0 .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 1 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 25 . . 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES . 162 393 155 145 123 7 2 251 105 87 73 54 WIDTHS .0 24 .0 12.0 .0 24.0 12.0 .0 24.0 12.0 .0 24 .0 12 .0 LANES - 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 UTILIZATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 . 00 TRUCKPERCENTS 2.0 5.0 .0 9.0 18.0 14 .0 .0 23.0 11.0 6.0 4 .0 4 .0 PEAKHOURFACTORS .94 .94 .94 .91 .91 .91 .87 .87 .87 .88 .88 . 88 ARRIVALTYPES 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4. 0 4 .0 4 .0 40 4 .0 4.0 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 4 . 0 MINIMUMS 15.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 51.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5 . 0 IDEALSATFLOWS . 1900 1900 1900 1900 19130 1900 1900 1900 1.900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1.1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 140 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NSTOPFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 0 3535 1832 0 3098 1583 0 3090 1626 0 3321 1736 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 55 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET .00 1 CYCLES 90 110 10 PEDTIME .0 0 GREENTIMES 18.36 .00 26.85 11.39 .00 17 .41 YELLOWTIMES 4 .00 .00 4 .00 4 .00 .00 , 4.00 CRITICALS 3 0 2 12 0 5 EXCESS 0 ,P� South 405 Place 12/27/99 16th Street SW/Lind Avenue SW 15 :03:55 Year 2001 A.M. Peak Hour With Project File JCR-P2A SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 55 1 Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 Phase 5 1 Phase 6 1 **/** * + + + * * A A * + + + * * ++++ **** / \ *> <+ + +> <* * <++++ <**** v v ++++ ++++ A **** v v North <+ + -> ++++> + + t ++++ + + t v G/C= .204 G/C= .000 G/C= 298 G/C= . 127 G/C= .000 G/C= . 193 G= 18.4" G= .0" G= 26.0 G= 11.4" G= .0" G= 17 .4" Y+R= 4 .0" Y+R= .0" Y+R= 4 .07 Y+R= 4 .0" Y+R= .0" Y+R= 4 .0" OFF= .0% OFF=24 .8% OFF=24 .8% OFF=59. 1% OFF=76 .2% OFF=76.2% C= 90 sec G= 74 .0 sec = 82 .2% Y116.0 sec = 17 .8% Ped= .0 sec = .0% MVMT TOTALS N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Int Param:Units RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total AdjVol: vph 180 439 165 138 142 8 2 304 121 104 87 61 1751 Wid/Ln:ft/# 0/0 24/2 12/1 0/0 24/2 12/1 0/0 24/2 12/1 0/0 24/2 12/1 g/C Rqd@C:% 0 22 15 0 15 8 0 16 14 0 12 10 g/C Used: % 0 31 22 0 20 14 0 31 22 0 20 14 SV @E: vph 0 1094 394 0 634 209 0 956 350 0 679 231 4547 Svc Lvl:LOS C+ C C C C+ C+ C+ C C+ Deg Sat:v/c .00 .57 .42 .00 .44 .04 .00 .32 .35 .00 .28 .25 .43 Avg Del:s/v .0 26.9 32.2 .0 32 .2 33 9 .0 24 .4 31.6 .0 30 .8 36. 1 28 . 9 Tot Del:min 0 69 22 0 38 1 0 31 16 0 25 9 211 # Stops:veh 0 130 36 0 61 2 0 59 26 0 40 14 368 Max Que:veh 0 21 6 0 11 TO 0 11 5 0 8 3 65 Max Que: ft 0 274 162 0 151 25 0 150 127 0 98 67 274 APPR TOTALS Int Param:Units N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Total AdjVol: vph 784 288 427 252 1751 Svc Lvl:LOS C+ C C+ C C+ Deg Sat:v/c .54 .43 .33 .28 .43 Avg Del:s/v 28.0 32.2 26.4 32 . 1 28.9 Tot Del:min 91 39 47 34 211 # Stops:veh 166 63 85 54 368 Max Que:veh 27 11 16 11 65 Max Que: ft 274 151 150 98 274 • South 405 Place 12/27/99 16th Street SW/Lind Avenue SW 15:03 :42 Year 2001 A.M. Peak Hour With Project File JCR-P2A SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) .43 Vehicle Delay 18.4 Level of Service C+ Sq 55 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 Phase 5 I Phase 6 1 **/** * + + + * * A A * + + + * * ++++ **** / \ *> <+ + +> <* * <++++ <**** v v ++++ ++++ A **** v v North <+ + +> ++++> + + + ++++ + + + v G/C= .204 G/C= .000 G/C= .298 G/C= . 127 G/C= .000 G/C= . 193 G= 18.4" G= .0" G= 26.8h G= 11.4" G= .0" G= 17.4" Y+R= 4 .0" Y+R= .0" Y+R= 4 .0r Y+R= 4 .0" Y+R= .0" Y+R= 4 .0" OFF= .0% OFF=24 .8% OFF=24 .8 OFF=59. 1% OFF=76.2% OFF=76.2% C= 90 sec G= 74 .0 sec = 82.2% Y=16.0 sec = 17 .8% Ped= .0 sec = .0% Lane Width/ g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L Max Group I Lanes ' Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E IVolume ! v/c I Delay I S 190% Queue I N Approach 17 .9 C+ ILT+RTI 12/1 . 155 I .215 24/2 .223 .309 I 278 ' 1394 I 165 619 I .419.566 I 20. 1 I *C 17 .3 + I 162 ft274 I S Approach 16 .6 C+ I TH+RT 24/2 . 155 .309 830 956 306 .320 15.5 C+ 150 ft LT 112/1 . 141 I .215 I 243 ' 350 I 121 I .346 I 19.6 I C+ ' 127 ftI E Approach 20 .6 C ILT+RTI 12/1 .075 24/2 . 147 ' ..205 138 I 472 113 I 609 ' 288 I .037 0 .442 I 20.21.7 6 '*C ' 125 ftI W Approach 20 .3 C ILTTH+RTI 12/1 24/2 ' .099 115 I . 138 I 126 I 679 231 I 161 I .255.281 I 22 .5 19.6 I *C+ I 677 ftI • r1 South 405 Place 12/27 12/27 :06 16th Street SW/Lind Avenue SW File JCR-P2P Year 2001 P.M. Peak Hour With Proj-ct SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD LOSTTIME 3.0 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters W APPLABELS N E S 0 .0 .0 GRADES -3.0 . 0 0 0 PEDLEVELS 0 NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 NONE NONE 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES PARKINGSIDES 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 20 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT , RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH VOLUMES 43 282 148 309 90 9 7 546 94 125 149 .0 24 .0 WIDTHS .0 24 .0 12.0 .00 24 .0 12 .0 .00 24 .0 12.00 2 LANES 0 2 1 UTILIZATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 1.00 10 .00 0 .0 TRUCKPERCENTS 5.0 11.0 6.0 5.0 8.03 3 PEAKHOURFACTORS .92 .92 .92 .93 .93 .93 .91 .91 .91 .90 .90 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES YES YES YES Y4ES0 Y4ES0 YES YES YES YES S NARANCES 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 MINIMUMS 4 .0 4 .0 5.0 5 .0 5 .0 IDEALSATFLOWS5.0 5 .0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5 .0 5 .0 5 .0 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 190019001 00 . FACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DELAYFACT�ORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 NSTO PRS 1.00 1.0 1.00 NORM1 NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORb GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM 0 312 SATURATIONFLOWS 0 3423 1728 0 3185 1805 0 3614 1641 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 55 LEADLAGS NONE PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO OFFSET .00 OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET .0 CYCLES 90 110 10 GREENTIMES 14 .72 .00 21. 10 20.78 .00 17 .40 YELLOWTIMES 4 .00 .00 4 .000 4 .001 .00 0 4 .00 CRITICALS 3 0 EXCESS 0 ................. ......,v it • South 405 Place 122//2 27 : 9 9 1 /9 16th Street SW/Lind Avenue SW File JCR-P2P Year 2001 P.M. Peak Hour With Project SIGNAL94/TEppAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of 'Intersection Performance Sq 55 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 Phase 4 1 Phase 5 1 Phase 6 **/** + + A **** * + + + ++++ <**** v v A **** v v * *> ++++ + * v G/C= .164 G/C= .000 G/C= .234 G/C= 4.231 G/C= •000 G/C= • 10 3 OFF G= 14 .7" G= .0" G= 21. 1 G= 20.8" G= " Y+R= .0.0" G=Y+R_- 4 Y+R 17 . = 4 .0" Y+R= .0" Y+R= 4 .0" Y+R= 4 .0" OFF= .0% OFF=20 .8% OFF=20.8% OFF=48.7% OFF=76 .2% OFF=76 • .0% .0 sec C= 90 sec G= 74 .0 sec = 82.2% 4=16.0 sec = 17 .8% Ped Approach Int E Approach .S Approach RT ppH LT Total par TOTALS N Approach RT PTH LT RT TH LT Param:Units RT TH LT AdjVol• vph 49 323 161 320 102 110 8 630 103 146 174 280 2306 Wid :ft/# 0/0 24/2 12/1 0/0 24/2 12/11 0/00 24/2 12/1 0/00 2 16 4/2 12/1 1 g/C Rqd@C:% 0 20 22 0 16 16.. 0 19 0 25 17 g/C sed: 630 4324 4467 SV Used: % 0 25 178 0 20 24437 0 887 282 0 SV @E: vph 0 841 298 0 651 I C C C Svc C+ C C C+ C C .59 Deg Sat:VOS •02 .00 .72 . 36 .00 .50 .65 Deg Sat:v/c •00 .44 .53 .00 .65 .0 33 . 1 34 .6 .0 32 .7 34 .4 33 .2 .0 29 .5 36.8 .0 34 .6 26. 1 0 88 15 0 44 40 320 Tot Del:s/v0 71 63 518 Tot ops:ve 0 46 37 0 61 2 0 146 23 # Stops:veh 24 4 0 13 r. 11 90 Max Que:veh 0 14 72 0 17 0 0 72 Max Que ft 0 186 172 0 217 25 0 310 113 0 113 267 310 Int APPR TOTALS S Approach W Approach Total Param:Units N Approach E Approach 533 432 741 600 2306 AdjVol: vph C C C C C .57 .59 DegSvc Sat:LOS .47 .63 67 33.5 33 .9 Avg De1:v/c 31.7 34 .4 33.3 84 2 o Del:min 71 62 103 1348 320 Tot Stops:veh: 116 99 169 # 28 24 90 518 21 17 310 24 30 Max Que:vt 186 217 61 Max Que: ft _..„, .--0" } 1 - South. 405 Place 12/27/99 16th Street SW/Lind Avenue SW 15 : 06:24 Year 2001 P.M. Peak Hour With Project File JCR-P2P SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4 ] - Capacity Anal sis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) .59 V-hicle Delay 21.6 Level of Service C Sq 55 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 Phase 5 I Phase 6 **/** * + + + + + A A * + + + + + ++++ **** T *> <+ + +> <+ + <++++ <**** v V ++++ ++++ A **** V V North <+ * *> ++++> + * �* ++++ + * * v G/C= . 164 G/C= .000 G/C= .234 G/C= .231 G/C= .000 G/C= . 193 G= 14 .7" G= .0" G= 21. 1" G= 20.8" G= .0" G= 17 .4" Y+R= 4 .0" Y+R= .0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4 .0" Y+R= .0" Y+R= 4 . 0" OFF= .0% OFF=20 .8% OFF=20.8% OFF=48.7% OFF=76.2% OFF=76.2% C= 90 sec , G= 74 .0 sec = 82 .2% YL 16 .0 sec = 17 .8% Ped= .0 sec = . 0% I Lne (Width/ I g/C I Service Rater Adj l 1 :UII19( nx1aup %ro Lane Regd Used @C (vph) @E Volume v/c Dy S Que N Approach 20.2 C ILT+RTI 12/1 l . 159 l . 175 l 189 I 298 l 161 I .533 I 23.3 WI 172 ftl S Approach 22 .0 C lLT+RTI 12/1 l . 128 I . 175 1 178 I 282 l 103 1 .359 l 21.5 l *C 1113 ftl E Approach 22.7 C lLT+RTI 12/1 l .075 l .242 I 325 l 437 l 410 I .•023 I 16.8 1 * ,_ 1 225 ftl W Approach 21 . 6 C lLT+RTI 12/1 l .220 I .242 I 321 I 432 I 280 I .648 I 22 .2 I *C 1267 ftl Y1 ' IJ . -' J - J Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2. 1 Page 1 *********** ***********************r*************************** File Name JCR-C3A.HCOI Streets: (N-S) Access Drive (E-W) 16th Street SW Major Street Direction EW Length of Time Analyzed 60 (min) Analyst 1 C. V. Brown Date of Analysis 12/27/99 Other Information Driveway LOS, 2001 Volumes, AM Peak Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound LTRLTRL T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 1 1< 0 0 1< 0 0 0 0 0> 1< 0 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 36 345 0 293 38 5 0 5 PHF .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 . .95 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC's (%) 0 0 0 Q o 0 0 0 SU/RV's (%) 0 1 0 1. 0 0 0 0 CV's (%) 0 1 . 0 1 0 0 0 0 PCE's 1. 1 1 1. 1 1 1. 1 1. 1 1. 1 1. 1 Adjustment Factors 1 Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver 1 Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2 .60 Through Traffic Minor Road .- 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2 . 1 Page 2 **************************************************************** WorkSheet for TWSC Inter ection Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting ;Flows: (vph) 312 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 962 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 962 Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.99 Step 2 : LT from Major Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 331 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1192 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1192 Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.96 Step 3: TH from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting ,Flows: (vph) 693 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 472 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.96 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 455 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 693 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 420 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.96 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.96 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0 .96 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 405 t . p . 6 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2 . 1 Page 3 **************************************************************** Intersection Performance Summary FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App SB L 6 405 > > > 570 6.5 B 6 .5 SB R 6 962 > > > EB L 42 1192 3. 1 A 0.3 Intersection Delay = 0.2 21r • Center For Microcomput rs In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Re'.ease 2 . 1 Page 1 **************************************************************** File Name JCR-C3P.HCO Streets: (N-S) Access Drive (E-W) 16th Street SW Major Street Direction EW Length of Time Analyzed 60 (min) Analyst C. V. Brown Date of Analysis 12/27/99 Other Information Driveway LOS, 2001 Volumes, PM Peak Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound LTRLTRL T R L T R 1 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 1 1< 0 0 l.< 0 0 0 0 0> 1< 0 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 7 237 0 235 7 31 0 29 PHF .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC's (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,'b 0 SU/RV's (%) 0 1 0 1 0 0 . '\O 0 CV's (%) 0 .1 01 0 0 0 0 PCE 's 1. 1 1 1. 1 1 1. 1 1. 1 1. 1 1. 1 1 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5 .50 2 .60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 . 1 • Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2 . 1 Page 2 **************************************************************** WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 238 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1049 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1049 Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.97 Step 2 : LT from Major Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 242 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1315 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1315 Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.99 Step 3: TH from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 482 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 609 Capacity Adjustment Factor .. due to Impeding Movements 0.99 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 605 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 Step 4 : LT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 482 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 557 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.99 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0 .99 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.99 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 554 , 41V A l Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2 . 1 Page 3 **************************************************************** Intersection Performance Summary FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App SB L 36 554 > > > 719 5.5 B 5 .5 SB R 34 1049 > > > EB L 8 1315 2.8 A 0 . 1 Intersection Delay = 0.6 5