The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCouncil 10/24/2005AGENDA RENTON CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING October 24, 2005 Monday, 7:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE 01� ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL 3. PUBLIC HEARING: Annexation and zoning of 65 acres (expanded from 31.24 acres by the Boundary Review Board) located between 140th Ave. SE and Lyons Ave. NE, north of NE 136th St. (Mosier 11) 4. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT 5. AUDIENCE COMMENT (Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is allowed five minutes. The comment period will be limited to one-half hour. The second audience comment period later on in the agenda is unlimited in duration.) When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer, please walk to the podium and state your name and address for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST NAME. 6. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further discussion if requested by a Councilmember. a. Approval of Council meeting minutes of 10/17/2005. Council concur. b. City Clerk submits appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding the Honey Brooke West Preliminary Plat (PP-05-055); appeal filed by Kay Haynes, 551 Elma Pl. NE, Renton, 98059, on 10/3/2005, accompanied by required fee. Refer to Planning and Development Committee. c. City Clerk submits petition for street vacation for portion of Rosario Ave. SE; petitioner James Jacques, 1216 N. 38th St., Renton, 98056 (VAC-05-004). Refer to Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator; set public hearing on 1 1/21/2005. (See 9. for resolution.) d. Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department submits 10% Notice of Intent to annex petition for the proposed Hudson Annexation and recommends a public meeting be set on 11/14/2005 to consider the petition; 13.69 acres generally bounded by 107th Ave. SE, I 1 tth Ave. SE, SE 166th St., and SE 169th St. Council concur. e. Finance and Information Services Department recommends a public hearing be set on 11/14/2005 to consider the City of Renton 2006 Revenue Sources and Preliminary Budget, and a public hearing be set on 11/28/2005 to consider the 2006 Budget. Refer to Committee of the Whole; set public hearings. f. Transportation Systems Division submits CAG-05-073, 2005 Street Overlay; and requests approval of the project, authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of $169,903.49, commencement of 60-day lien period, and release of retained amount of $8,942.29 to Western Asphalt, Inc., contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. g. Utility Systems Division submits CAG-05-033, Iloquiam Pl. NE & SR-900 Storm System; and requests approval of the project, authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of $380.80, commencement of 60-day lien period, and release of retained amount of $1,173.11 to Young Life Construction, contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. h. Utility Systems Division recommends approval of the CamWest Development, Inc. request for reimbursement in the amount of $34,619.25 for costs associated with the replacement of the water line in NE 20th St. Council concur. (CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE) 7. CORRESPONDENCE UNFINISHED BUSINESS Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics marked with an asterisk (*) may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be held by the Chair if further review is necessary. a. Community Services Committee: Skate Park Lighting b. Finance Committee: Vouchers; Contract Policy c. Transportation (Aviation) Committee: Deferral of Street Improvements; Renton Hill Access Concurrence Letter with WSDOT 9. RESOL.L1'l'IONS AND ORDINANCES Resolution: Setting public hearing on 11/21/2005 for Jacques street vacation petition (see 6.c.) Ordinances for second and final reading: a. Approving the Park Terrace Annexation (lst reading 10/17/2005) b. Establishing R-8 zoning for 63 acres of the Park Terrace Annexation (Ist reading 10/17/2005.) c. Establishing R-10 zoning for 3.4 acres of the Park Terrace Annexation (1st reading 10/17/2005) d. Vacation of portion of Lyons Ave. NE; petitioner Robin Bales (1st reading 10/17/2005) c. Vacation of portion of N. 14th St.; petitioner Pool Brothers Construction (1st reading 10/17/2005) 10. NEW BUSINESS (Includes Council Committee agenda topics; call 425-430-6512 for recorded information.) 11. AUDIENCE COMMENT 12. EXECUTIVE SESSION (labor contracts) 13. ADJOURNMENT COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA (Preceding Council Meeting) Council Chambers 6:00 p.m. Boeing Subdistrict I B Conceptual Plan • Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk • CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 AND ARE RE-CABLECAST TUES. & THURS. AT 1 1:00 AM & 9:00 PM, WED. & FRI. AT 9:00 AM & 7:00 PM AND SAT. & SUN. AT 1:00 I'M & 9:00 PM RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting October 24, 2005 Council Chambers Monday, 7:00 p.m. M I N U T E? S Renton City Hall CALL, TO ORDER Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order and led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag. ROLL CALL OF TERRI BRIERE, Council President; DENS LAW; DAN CLAWSON; TONI COUNCILMEMBERS NELSON; DON PERSSON; MARCI PALMER. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCILMAN RANDY CORMAN. CARRIED. CITY STAFF IN KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER, Mayor; JAY COVINGTON, Chief ATTENDANCE Administrative Officer; LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City Attorney; BONNIE WALTON, City Clerk; GREGG ZIMMERMAN, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator; ALEX PIETSCH, Economic Development Administrator; MIKE WEBBY, Human Resources Administrator; DON ERICKSON, Senior Planner; LINDA HERZOG, Interim Assistant to the CAO; COMMANDER CHARLES MARSALISI, Police Department. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in Annexation: Mosier II, 140th accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Keolker-Wheeler opened the Ave SE, SE 136th St public hearing to consider the proposed expanded annexation and zoning of 65 acres located between 140th Ave. SE and Lyons Ave. NE, north of SE 136th St. (Mosier I[). Don Erickson, Senior Planner, stated that this is the first of two public hearings on the zoning for the expanded annexation proposal. Mr. Erickson discussed the history of the annexation, stating that the original 10.4-acre annexation submitted in June 2004, was expanded by Council to 31 acres. In February 2005, Council accepted the 60% petition and held the first of two required public hearings. The City of Renton invoked the Boundary Review Board's (BRB) jurisdiction in May 2005 and requested the boundaries be expanded. The BRB met on August 19, 2005, and expanded the boundaries by 34 acres. Reviewing the existing conditions of the area, Mr. Erickson reported that the expanded site is within Renton's Potential Annexation Area (PAA) and abuts Renton on a portion of its western, northern and eastern boundaries. There are wetlands northwest of the site, a Class 4 stream on the site, and the topography is relatively flat. Fire District #25, Water District #90, Renton sewer, and the Renton School District currently provide public services. Mr. Erickson stated that 83 single-family homes exist on the site. He described the differences between the original and expanded areas, noting that the 13-lot subdivision directly north of the original proposal would have been left as an unincorporated island if it had not been included in the expanded annexation area. In regards to the fiscal impact analysis, Mr. Erickson estimated a deficit of $8,779 at current development and a surplus of $35,788 at full development. He emphasized that even with the City's 6% utility tax, homeowners will save approximately $100 per year on property taxes and combined fees. Mr. Erickson reviewed the site's current King County zoning; reporting that Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates the original 31 acres, and the nine acres directly north of Maplewood Heights Elementary School, as R-4 (four dwelling units per net acre) zoning. October 24, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 367 The remaining area is designated as R-8 (eight dwelling units per net acre) zoning. He noted that the proposed R-4-zoned area is one of three former R-5- zoned sites grandfathered in at a maximum density of five dwelling units per net acre. In conclusion, Mr. Erickson stated that the proposed annexation is generally consistent with BRB objectives and City policies, and appears to serve the best interests and general welfare of Renton. Responding to Councilman Clawson's question regarding the cost and revenue calculations for street improvements, Mr. Erickson stated that this particular annexation includes existing subdivisions that most likely have inferior streets requiring the expenditure of more money. However, when a typical annexation comes into the City, new streets are developed that require little maintenance. He noted that the average City street is designed to a 20-year standard rather than King County's ten-year standard. Public comment was invited. Norman Green, 14128 SE 132nd St., Renton, 98059, opposed the annexation, stating his disapproval of Council's decision to invoke the BRB's jurisdiction to increase the boundaries of the annexation area. Mr. Green said affected residents in the expanded annexation area did not have the same opportunities to participate in the annexation process as the original petitioners. He commented that the Council's previous actions and perceived attitudes are contributing to the distrust and anti -annexation position of many potential contributing residents in the East Renton Plateau. Bill Welsheimer, 13633 144th Ave. SE, Renton, 98059, stated his opposition to the annexation, and expressed concerns regarding the development of the East Renton Plateau area. He also stated his opposition to the Growth Management Act, and opined that the increase in density in the area will reduce the quality of life. Mr. Erickson noted that this is the fourth public hearing held on the proposed annexation, and the second public hearing on the expanded area, including the one held by the BRB in August 2005. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL: ACCEPT THE MOSIER II ANNEXATION AS EXPANDED BY THE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD, CONSIDER R-4 ZONING FOR THE ORIGINAL 31- ACRE SITE AND THE 9.8 ACRES NORTH OF MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, CONSIDER R-8 ZONING FOR THE REMAINING PROPERTIES INCLUDING PUGET COLONY HOMES AND THE 13-LOT SUBDIVISION TO THE NORTH OF THE ORIGINAL 31- ACRE SITE, AND SET A SECOND PUBLIC HEARING ON 11/28/2005 TO CONSIDER ZONING FOR THE EXPANDED ANNEXATION. CARRIED. (See page 371 for further discussion on this matter.) ADMINISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2005 and beyond. Items noted included: October 24, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 368 • City of Renton Police and Fire Departments will participate in a Safety Fair at Sam's Club on October 29th. During the Safety Fair, Sam's Club will award a $1,125 Safe Neighborhood donation to both the Renton Police Department and the Renton Fire Department. The funds will be used for at - risk youth activities and supplies, domestic violence prevention, the "Care Bare" program, and toward the purchase of smoke detectors for seniors and low-income homeowners. • The City of Renton urges people to check their smoke detectors monthly and to make sure the batteries are changed whenever there is a time change. Clocks will be turned back one hour on Saturday, October 29th. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of October 17, 2005. Council concur. October 17, 2005 Appeal: Honey Brooke West, City Clerk submitted an appeal of the Hearing Examiner's decision regarding Haynes, PP-05-055 the Honey Brooke West Preliminary Plat (PP-05-055); appeal filed by Kay Haynes, 551 Elma Pl. NE, Renton, 98059, on 10/3/2005, accompanied by required fee. Refer to Planning and Development Committee. Vacation: Rosario Ave SE, City Clerk submitted a petition for street vacation for portion of Rosario Ave. Jacques, VAC-05-004 SE; petitioner James Jacques, 1216 N. 38th St., Renton, 98056 (VAC-05-004). Refer to Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator; set public hearing on 11/21/2005. (See page 370 for resolution.) Annexation: Hudson, Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department 107th Ave SE, SE 166th St submitted 10% Notice of Intent to annex petition for the proposed Hudson Annexation and recommended a public meeting be set on 11/14/2005 to consider the petition; 13.69 acres generally bounded by 107th Ave. SE, l I lth Ave. SE, SE 166th St., and SE 169th St. Council concur. Budget: 2006, Annual City of Finance and Information Services Department recommended a public hearing Renton be set on 11/14/2005 to consider the City of Renton 2006 Revenue Sources and Preliminary Budget, and a public hearing be set on 11/28/2005 to consider the 2006 Budget. Refer to Committee of the Whole; set public hearings. CAG: 05-073, 2005 Street Transportation Systems Division submitted CAG-05-073, 2005 Street Overlay; Overlay, Western Asphalt and requested approval of the project, authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of $169,903.49, commencement of 60-day lien period, and release of retained amount of $8,942.29 to Western Asphalt, Inc., contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. CAG: 05-033, Hoquiam Pl NE Utility Systems Division submitted CAG-05-033, Hoquiam Pl. NE & SR-900 & SR-900 Storm System, Storm System; and requested approval of the project, authorization for final pay Young Life Construction estimate in the amount of $380.80, commencement of 60-day lien period, and release of retained amount of $1,173.11 to Young Life Construction, contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. Utility: Water Line Utility Systems Division recommended approval of the CamWest Development, Replacement Reimbursement, Inc. request for reimbursement in the amount of $34,619.25 for costs associated NE 20th St, CamWest with the replacement of the water line in NE 20th St. Council concur. Development MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. October 24, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 369 Added A letter was read from Patrick J. Gilroy, LandTrust, Inc., 1560 140th Ave. NE, CORRESPONDENCE Ste. 100, Bellevue, 98005, requesting a latecomer agreement for sanitary sewer Latecomer Agreement: installation for the Wedgewood Lane Division 2 development on Hoquiam Ave. LandTrust, Sanitary Sewer NE. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL REFER (Hoquiam Ave NE), LA-05- THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. 004 UNFINISHED BUSINESS Planning and Development Committee Chair Clawson presented a report Planning and Development recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation to set a public hearing Committee date on 11 /21/2005, to consider proposed changes to Chapter 2 of Title IV Comprehensive Plan: 2005 (Development Regulations) of City Code, for Residential —I and Resource Amendments, R-1 & RC Conservation zones. The proposed changes implement adopted policies in the Zones Comprehensive Plan for the Low Density Residential designation and accompany recommended Land Use Map amendments considered as part of application 2005-M-1, Low Density Residential Map Revisions. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Comprehensive Plan: 2005 Planning and Development Committee Chair Clawson presented a report Amendments, Inclusion of recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation to set a public hearing West Hill in PAA on 11/14/2005, to consider a proposal to include the West Hill in Renton's Potential Annexation Area and to amend the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element Map to adopt Renton land use designations for this area. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Community Services Community Services Committee Chair Nelson presented a report Committee recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve the addition Community Services: Skate of lights to the Skate Park contingent on available funding in the 2007 Capital Park Lighting Improvement Program cycle. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Finance Committee Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report recommending approval of Finance: Vouchers Claim Vouchers 241978 — 242497 and two wire transfers totaling $2,445,397.13; and approval of Payroll Vouchers 60441 — 60665, one wire transfer, and 587 direct deposits totaling $1,904,198.38. MOVED BY PERSSON SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Transportation (Aviation) Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chair Palmer presented a report Committee recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation to set a public hearing Development Services: on 11/21/2005, to consider proposed City Code amendments to eliminate the Deferral of Street option of deferrals subject to recording of restrictive covenants, and establishing Improvements a new option for certain short plats of voluntary payment of a fee -in -lieu for approved street improvement deferrals. MOVED BY PALMER, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. WSDOT: Renton Hill Access Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chair Palmer presented a report Concurrence Letter recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve the Letter of Concurrence, which documents that the City of Renton and the Washington State Department of Transportation concur with the Renton Hill access. The Committee further authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the Letter of Concurrence. MOVED BY PALMER, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. October 24, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 370 RESOLUTIONS AND The following resolution was presented for reading and adoption: ORDINANCES Resolution #3778 A resolution was read setting a public hearing date on 11/21/2005 to vacate a Vacation: Rosario Ave SE, portion of Rosario Ave. SE, north of SE 2nd Pl. (James Jacques; VAC-05-004). Jacques, VAC-05-004 MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. The following ordinances were presented for second and final reading: Ordinance #5161 An ordinance was read annexing approximately 80 acres located east of Annexation: Park Terrace, SE Anacortes Ave. NE, if extended, south of 1 12th St., if extended, north of SE 112th PI & Anacortes Ave NE 122nd St., if extended, and west of Hoquiam Ave. NE, if extended (Park Terrace Annexation). MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #5162 An ordinance was read establishing the zoning classification for approximately Annexation: Park Terrace, R-8 63 acres of property annexed within the City of Renton generally located south Zoning of SE 112th St., if extended, and east of Anacortes Ave. NE, if extended, north of SE 122nd St., if extended, and west of 144th Ave. SE, if extended, from R-4 (Urban Residential four dwelling units per acre; King County zoning), R-6 (Urban Residential six dwelling units per acre; King County zoning), and R-8 (Urban Residential eight dwelling units per acre; King County zoning) to R-8 (eight dwelling units per net acre) zoning; Park Terrace Annexation. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #5163 An ordinance was read establishing the zoning classification for approximately Annexation: Park Terrace, R- 3.4 acres of property annexed within the City of Renton generally located south 10 Zoning of SE 112th St., if extended, and east of Anacortes Ave. NE, if extended, north of SE 113th St., if extended, and west of Duvall Ave. NE, if extended, from R-6 (Urban Residential six dwelling units per acre; King County zoning) to R-10 (ten dwelling unit per net acre) zoning; Park Terrace Annexation. MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #5164 An ordinance was read vacating a portion of Lyons Ave. NE, located Vacation: Lyons Ave NE, approximately 144 feet south of NE 4th St., on the westerly half of the road, for Bales, VAC-04-002 a distance of approximately 100 feet (Steve Beck & Core Design [Bales] VAC- 04-002). MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #5165 An ordinance was read vacating a portion of N. 14th St. located east of Lake Vacation: N 14th St, Pool Washington Blvd. N. and Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park (Pool Brothers Brothers Construction, VAC- Construction, LLC; VAC-05-001). MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED 05-001 BY LAW, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS MOVED BY BRIERS, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL SET A PUBLIC Planning: Highlands Sub -Area HEARING ON 11/14/2005 TO CONSIDER EXTENDING OR RENEWING Plan Study Area Moratorium THE TIME PERIOD FOR A MORATORIUM ON NEW DEVELOPMENT IN THE R-10 AND RM-F ZONES WITHIN THE HIGHLANDS SUB -AREA PLAN STUDY AREA. CARRIED. October 24, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 371 AUDIENCE COMMENT Lily Bishai, 14005 SE 133rd St., Renton, 98059, requested clarification Citizen Comment: Bishai, regarding the zoning for the Mosier II Annexation area. Ms. Bishai voiced Mosier II Annexation, 140th concerns about the types and density of housing allowed in Renton's R-8 zone Ave SE, SE 136th St compared to King County's R-4 zone, and questioned the reasons for changing the zoning designation. Mayor Keolker-Wheeler and Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed the characteristics of Renton's R-4 (four dwelling units per net acre) and R-8 (eight dwelling units per net acre) zones, pointing out that they are both residential and allow only detached single-family units. Councilman Clawson and Economic Development Administrator Alex Pietsch described the similarities and differences between Renton's and King County's zoning of the area. Mr. Pietsch pointed out that Renton's R-4 zone is a downzone for the area. Councilman Clawson explained that Renton and King County are in agreement that eventually all of Renton's Potential Annexation Area (PAA) in the East Renton Plateau will be annexed to the City. He noted that annexation is not a matter of if, but when, and he expressed concern that people may feel they are being annexed against their will. Council Clawson reviewed the advantages of being a Renton resident, including the ability to take advantage of City amenities at Renton resident rates. Mayor Keolker-Wheeler added that residents are not required to hook up to City sewer, but sewer is available if needed. She noted that sewer hook up is required when property is redeveloped. Mr. Covington stated that due to the Growth Management Act (GMA) adopted in 1990, cities are required to increase density in their corporate limits. The GMA also requires cities to eventually annex their PAAs. Mr. Covington stressed that this process is not unique to the City of Renton; all municipalities are required to abide by the GMA. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY BRIERS, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL RECESS INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR APPROXIMATELY 15 MINUTES TO DISCUSS LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH NO OFFICIAL ACTION TO BE TAKEN AND THAT THE COUNCIL MEETING BE ADJOURNED WHEN THE EXECUTIVE SESSION IS ADJOURNED. CARRIED. Time: 7:49 p.m. Executive session was conducted. There was no action taken. The executive session and the Council meeting adjourned at 8:12 p.m. Bonnie I. Walton, CMC, City Clerk Recorder: Jason Seth October 24, 2005 RENTON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDAR Office of the City Clerk COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING October 24, 2005 COMMITTEE/CHAIRMAN DATE/TIME AGENDA COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MON., 10/31 (Briere) MON., 11/07 *Immediately Following the Council Meeting, Which Starts at 5:00 p.m.* COMMUNITY SERVICES (Nelson) FINANCE (Persson) No Meeting (5th Monday) 2006 Budget Presentations; 2006 Revenue Projections PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT THURS., 11/03 Zoning Text Amendments re: Residential (Clawson) 3:00 p.m. Uses in the Commercial Arterial Zone; 2005 Comprehensive Plan Amendments re: West Hill Potential Annexation Area PUBLIC SAFETY MON., 11/07 (Law) TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) THURS., 11/03 (Palmer) UTILITIES THURS., 11/03 (Corman) 4:30 p.m. CANCELLER CANCELLED LandTrust Latecomer Agreement Request; Utility Rates (briefing only) NOTE: Committee of the Whole meetings are held in the Council Chambers unless otherwise noted. All other committee meetings are held in the Council Conference Room unless otherwise noted. ♦� =u - 1 MOSIER II ANNEXATION PUBLIC HEARING COUNCIL CONSIDERATION OF EXPANDED ANNEXATION AND POSSIBLE FUTURE ZONING October 24, 2005 Council last considered this annexation in February, 2005, when it accepted the 60% Direct Petition to Annex and authorized transmitting the Notice of Intent package to the Boundary Review Board. In May 2005 the City "invoked" the BRB's jurisdiction, which required them to hold a public hearing on whether to expand the boundaries of this proposed annexation. The BRB met in July 2005 and on July 19, 2005 voted to expand the boundaries of original 31-acre annexation by including a small 13-lot subdivision to the north, approximately nine acres to the east, north of Maplewood Elementary School, and the Puget Colony Homes subdivision to the west. The Board felt that the original 31-acre annexation did not meet some of the relevant planning policies of GMA and the Countywide Planning Policies, as well as specific Objectives that the Board is required to consider. They felt enlarging the annexation to 65.0 acres would result in more logical service areas, protection of existing neighborhoods, and more reasonable boundaries. On August 15, 2005, the City received the Boundary Review Board's Closing Letter for this annexation. At tonight's public hearing, the first on the expanded annexation, the Council must decide whether it wants to accept the expanded annexation, and if it does, what future zoning should be applied to this area when it comes into the City. Pursuant to state law (RCW 35A.14.340) the City is required to hold two public hearings at least 30-days apart on zoning for the annexation. Whereas, the City held one public hearing in February, it was for the original 31-acre annexation site. Since the site has now been enlarged to 65 acres, at least two public hearings on future zoning must be held on the new enlarged area. Tonight's public hearing will be the first of these two hearings. The subject annexation site is generally located south of NE 4th Street between 140th Avenue SE and Lyon Avenue NE (146th Ave SE) and north of SE 1361h Street (see exhibit on back). The expanded annexation site currently has King County's R-4 zoning and there are 83 existing single-family detached dwellings on it. Proposed zoning is R-4 (four units per net acre) on the portion that was the original annexation as well as the nine acres north of Maplewood Elementary School. The remaining portion would be zoned R-8 (eight units per net acre), both consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. For additional information regarding this annexation contact Don Erickson at 425-430-6581. Council Hearing Handout 10-24-05.doc\ Proposed Mosier II Annexation 400 800 Figure 3: Prezoning Map ---- ReNon City Limits I : 4800 r.cumcanm: DA:vOopmenf. N m,,lA)oihtvod,,& Stlaw-gu Nanning ArmexationBourdary AkI flto kh, A'Im mwv`N 0 Proposed Rat 6 LXI R,«.,uo p Mat YHO 0 Proposed R-8 Council Hearing Handout 10-24-05.doc\ auucAYaLLURlrVI/uUUallp uy JY aA.lAI Existing CondiftiZ Lindberg I'Annexation�'.� 10.6 acres 7m HIM IN al C Maplewood Elementary School. .Vicinity Map 1 Existing co n .S`4uCifiltQ; g f • e e e eea• .e ��jF�. / d s�1J•gq *i 41 2 5 a ra 3 Annual CQst�Co�tscz� .. - ... :Annual Pxoperiy Taafe� � �d.� s ` �1�,ya1iJhlity,F.ees �� ' � � aswafert(I�fetto Pecs) � 4 �, �4 . �arbagcColcliin i ul�3rihtyee ices r� X. $ewarotiequire�tQLaokup) . 7 � btatal: $3,9 �,$2 E. A Otto ism/is 4 Ya 1 A most 1 U too S TIT Tq 4ASIA L '�• ,�s ptk E J �' - Y m 3 4 CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: October 24, 2005 TO: Terri Briere, Council President Members of the Renton City Council FROM: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer SUBJECT: Administrative Report In addition to our day-to-day activities, the following items are worthy of note for this week: GENERAL INFORMATION City of Renton Police and Fire Departments will participate in a Safety Fair at Sam's Club on Saturday, October 29th, from I1:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. and a free one -day guest pass will be available to all individuals who attend the Safety Fair. During the Safety Fair, Sam's Club will award a $1,125 Safe Neighborhood donation to both the Renton Police Department and the Renton Fire Department. The funds will be used for at -risk youth activities and supplies, domestic violence prevention, the "Care Bare" program, and toward the purchase of smoke detectors for seniors and low-income homeowners. The City of Renton urges people to check their smoke detectors monthly and to make sure the batteries are changed whenever there is a time change. Clocks will be turned back one hour on Saturday, October 29th. Join the fight against the fastest -growing crime in Washington and the nation —identity theft —by attending the Washington State Identity Theft Summit, sponsored by the office of Washington State Attorney General Rob McKenna. The Summit is scheduled for Wednesday, November 2nd, from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. at the SeaTac Airport Doubletree Hotel, located at 18740 International Boulevard in SeaTac. A registration fee of $20.00 will cover lunch and program expenses. Online registration is available at www.atg.wa.gov/idtheftsumnvt. For more information, call 360-493-9500 or email idtheftsummit@atg.wa.gov. PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT • We are in the later stages of equipment and process testing and start-up for the new Maplewood Treatment Plant. The results of the water quality tests for the facility were good, and the plan is to begin pumping water into the City distribution system by mid -November. • On October 18th, the City issued a Notice to Proceed to Dennis R. Craig Construction to build the new sidewalks in the 2005 new sidewalk program. This project includes sidewalks on Benson Road South, within the Maplewood Glen neighborhood, and in the Highlands, as well as downtown curb ramps. The contractor is expected to start work in late October or early November. Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board. Staff Contact..... CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Al #: AJLS/City Clerk Bonnie I. Walton Subject: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's recommendation dated 7/26/2005 regarding the Honey Brooke West Preliminary Plat. (File No. LUA-05-055, PP) Exhibits: A. City Clerk's letter (10/10/2005) B. Appeal - Kay Haynes, President Blueberry Place HOA (10/3/2005) C. Request for Reconsideration (8/9/2005) and Response (9/19/2005) D. Hearing Examiner's Report & Recommendation (7/26/2005) For Agenda of: 10/24/2005 Agenda Status Consent .............. Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Ordinance ............. Resolution............ Old Business........ New Business....... Study Sessions...... Information......... Recommended Action: Approvals: Refer to Planning and Development Committee. Legal Dept...... Finance Dept... Other ............... Fiscal Impact: N/A Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Appeal of the Hearing Examiner recommendation on the Honey Brooke West Preliminary Plat was filed on 10/3/2005 by Kay Haynes, President for Blueberry Place HOA, accompanied by the required $75 fee. , STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Council action on the Honey Brooke West Preliminary Plat and appeal. X Rentonnet/agnbill/ bh . CITY OF RENTON City Clerk -Wheeler, Mayor Bonnie I. Walton Kathy Keolker October 10, 2005 APPEAL FILED BY: Kay Haynes, President Blueberry Place HOA RE: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision dated 7/26/2005 regarding Langley Development Group, Inc.'s application to subdivide an 8.3-acre site located in the 500-600 block of Hoquiam Avenue NE into 51 single-family lots, known as Honey Brooke West Preliminary Plat. (File No. LUA-05-055, PP) To Parties of Record: Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Renton City Code of Ordinances, written appeal of the hearing examiner's decision on the Honey Brooke West Preliminary Plat project has been filed with the City Clerk. In accordance with Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110F, within five days of receipt of the notice of appeal, the City Clerk shall notify all parties of record of the receipt of the appeal. Other parties of record may submit letters in support of their positions within ten (10) days of the date of mailing of the notification of the filing of the appeal. The deadline for submission of additional letters is October 20, 2005. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeals and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council's Planning and Development Committee. The Council liaison will notify all parties of record of the date and time of the Planning and Development Committee meeting. If you are not listed in local telephone directories and wish to attend the meeting, please call the Council liaison at 425-430-6501 for information. The recommendation of the Committee will be presented for consideration by the full Council at a subsequent Council meeting. Attached is a copy of the Renton Municipal Code regarding appeals of Hearing Examiner decisions or recommendations. Please note that the City Council will be considering the merits of the appeal based upon the written record previously established. Unless a showing can be made that additional evidence could not reasonably have been available at the prior hearing held by the Hearing Examiner, no further evidence or testimony on this matter will be accepted by the City Council. For additional information or assistance, please feel free to call me at 425-430-6502. Sincerely, Bonnie I. Walton City Clerk/Cable Manager Attachments cc: Council Liaison 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425) 430-6510 / FAX (425) 430-6516 ® This paper contains 50 % recycled material, 30 % post consumer RENTON AHEAD OF THE CURVE CITY OF RENTON APPEAL - HEARING EXAMINER WRITTEN APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION/RECOMMENDATION TO &''A TON CITY COUNCIL. ,,)) RECEIVED FILE, NO. —0A �'��-- �� / n p ;ITY CLERK'S OFFICE APPLICATION NAME: The undersigned interested party hereby files its Notice of Appeal from the decision or recommendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner, dated_. S%g�k-opgme 1J-t._____-20---,5—. 1. IDENTIFICATION OF PARTY APPELLANT: R qy f � }yj(J�S �Y�jj LDS , REPRESENTATIVE (IF ANY) Name:_. Address: �`�lLl►1 A PL IU,; Address: Telephone No. 7�J� of 17 %'o't / Telephone No. 2. SPECIFICATION OF ERRORS (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) Set forth below are the specific errors or law or fact upon which this appeal is based: FINDING OF FACT: (Please designate number as denoted in the Examiner's report) No. 1 Error: ) k, e4Z& � �' A)�_ Correction: CONCLUSIONS: No._i Error: OTHER " 4`V-e No. I Error: Correction: ./60 t4Lx+{„b iiv//t�.vr CE'N! nv �vrvwiw.v-r-c i 3. SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is requested to grant the following relief- (Attach explanation, if desired) Reverse the decision or recommendation and grant the following relief: )tt Modify the decision or recommendation as follows: Remand to the Examiner for further consideration as follows: Other Appellant/Repre ntative ignature Date NOTE: Please refer to Title IV, Chapter 8, of the Renton Municipal Code, and Section 4-8-110F, for specific appeal procedures. /%n /y ' l.. 4 1 / AJ. 1 , .1 r r , , heappeal .doc/forms City of Renton Municipal Code;_ Title_ IV, Chapter 8 Section_ 110 Appeals 4-8-110C4 The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by a fee in accordance with RMC 4-1-170, the fee schedule of the City. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) 4-8-110F: Appeals to City Council — Procedures 1. Time for Appeal: Unless a specific section or State law providing for review of decision of the Examiner requires review thereof by the Superior Court or any other body, any interested party aggrieved by the Examiner's written decision or recommendation may submit a notice of appeal to the City Council, upon a form furnished by the City Clerk, within fourteen (14) calendar days from the date of the Examiner's written report. 2. Notice to Parties of Record: Within five (5) days of receipt of the notice of appeal, the City Clerk shall notify all parties of record of the receipt of the appeal. 3. Opportunity to Provide Comments: Other parties of record may submit letters in support of their positions within ten (10) days of the dates of mailing of the notification of the filing of the notice of appeal. 4. Transmittal of Record to Council: Thereupon the Clerk shaII forward to the members of the City Council all of the pertinent documents, including the written decision or recommendation, findings and conclusions contained in the Examiner's report, the notice of appeal, and additional letters submitted by the parties. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-1982) 5. Council Review Procedures: No public hearing shall be held by the City Council. No new or additional evidence or testimony shall be accepted by the City Council unless a showing is made by the party offering the evidence that the evidence could not reasonably have been available at the time of the hearing before the Examiner. If the Council determines that additional evidence is required, the Council shall remand the matter to the Examiner for reconsideration and receipt of additional evidence. The cost of transcription of the hearing record shall be borne by the applicant. In the absence of an entry upon the record of an order by the City Council authorizing new or additional evidence or testimony, and a remand to the Hearing Examiner for receipt of such evidence or testimony, it shall be presumed that no new or additional evidence or testimony has been accepted by the City Council, and that the record before the City Council is identical to the hearing record before the Hearing Examiner. (Ord. 4389, 1-25-1993) 6. Council Evaluation Criteria: The consideration by the City Council shall be based solely upon the record, the Hearing Examiner's report, the notice of appeal and additional submissions by parties. 7. Findings and Conclusions Required: If, upon appeal of a decision of the Hearing Examiner on an application submitted pursuant to RMC 4-1-050F1, and after examination of the record, the Council determines that a substantial error in fact or law exists in the record, it may remand the proceeding to Examiner for reconsideration, or modify, or reverse the decision of the Examiner accordingly. 8. Council Action: If, upon appeal from a recommendation of the Hearing Examiner upon an application submitted pursuant to RMC 4-1-050F2 and F3, and after examination of the record, the Council determines that a substantial error in fact or law exists in the record, or that a recommendation of the Hearing Examiner should be should be disregarded or modified, the City Council may remand the proceeding to the Examiner for reconsideration, or enter its own decision upon the application. 9. Decision Documentation: In any event, the decision of the City Council shall be in writing and shall specify any modified or amended findings and conclusions other than those set forth in the report of the Hearing Examiner. Each material finding shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. The burden of proof shall rest with the appellant. (Ord 3658, 9-13-1982) 10. Council Action Final: The action of the Council approving, modifying or rejecting a decision of the Examiner shall be final and conclusive, unless appealed within the time frames established under subsection G5 of this Section. (Ord. 4660, 3-17-1997) The Blueberry Place community requests that the decision by the hearing examiner that the Honey Brooke West developers extend NE 6`h St be reversed for the following reasons: 1. Blueberry Place is a private gated community. NE 61h St is its only outlet. 2. The argument that the fire department requires the extension, although the City has provided no proof, is questionable since they had 2 opportunities to extend NE 60' and did not; when the apartment complex next to Blueberry PI was built, and when Blueberry Place itself was under construction. Instead, only a fire access road was determined necessary. 3. This contention is further questionable since the fire department requires a minimum 20 feet for access. The upper half of NE 6`h St (as it exists as Blueberry Place's entrance) is only 19 ft 10 in. It is doubtful that the City has ever done a study to determine the feasibility of NE Oh St being extended from Duvall. 4. If NE Oh St is extended Blueberry Place will have traffic from 2 directions: Duvall on one end and Hoquiam on the other. Traffic will only increase as the area grows. It will be an access not only for Honey Brooke West, but for everyone along Hoquiam, and all the side streets feeding into it. 5. Vehicle congestion likely would occur waiting for the gate to open at the island housing the gate code stanchion. 6. Stop signs would need to be installed at each side of the gate entrance for the safety and ease of Blueberry Place residents. 7. Extending our drive is unnecessary, and a waste of taxpayer dollars. Already existing are two quick, easy and convenient accesses from Hoquiam to Duvall via NE 1215` St and NE 118`h St, as well as close access to shopping from Hoquiam to to Sunset Blvd on one end, and NE 4`h St on the other. 8. The extension, an unnecessary shortcut for others, would have profound ramifications for those living in Blueberry Place. In addition: 1. Consideration would need to be given to Blueberry Place homes that would border the extension. There is concern for whether the road extension would cut through property lines. 2. Elevation rises where the road currently ends. Retaining walls along some areas may need to be constructed to protect homeowner property. 3. Runoff and drainage problems could result from the road construction where some Blueberry Place townhomes border the embankment at the elevated sections. 4. For residents bordering close to the extended street, there is also concern for the possibility of a vehicle crashing into backyards, and for the vulnerability of being accessible to vandals or worse. 5. Blueberry Place is highly sought after. The loss of our private drive and setback from Duvall could cause a reduction in property values, and a loss of property tax to the City, not to mention the difficulty in selling our homes during construction. Blueberry PL townhomes appreciate quickly, current value is over $300,000. 6. Before the hearing examiner made his determination, no one from the City even considered making an on -site inspection in order to make a fair decision. September 21, 2005 Renton City Council City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way Renton. WA 98055 Re: Honey Brooke West Preliminary Plat LUA-05-055 ECF, PP Subject: Blueberry Place Townhomes and the proposed NE 6 h St extension Dear City Council, My name is Kay Haynes. I am the president of the Blueberry Place Homeowners Association. Our townhome community lies directly below the Honey Brooke West Preliminary Plat. Myself and others representing our community appeared July 12 in front of the hearing examiner as appellants, along with the developer, to protest the City's desire to extend NE 61h St as part of the development of the Honey Brooke West plat. Blueberry Place has a different, and perhaps more serious position for opposing the extension, which we did our best to present to the hearing examiner. NE 6t' St in its present condition is a narrow private one-way drive from Duvall Ave NE to our gated entrance. At that hearing we listed the many issues that will impact Blueberry Place if NE 61h is extended to Hoquiam Ave NE, as well as presenting valid reasons why it is not necessary. We were extremely disappointed that in his decision to deny the developer's and our appeal he ignored Blueberry Place's concerns, sighting as his only reasoning a failure of the developer to meet an appeal deadline. In correspondence dated September 19 to Mr. C. Thomas Foster of Langley Development Group, the hearing examiner denied their appeal to reconsider his decision. It should be noted that on file is Blueberry Place's written support of their appeal for reconsideration, which we submited. Apparently, our community was ignored for a second time. Part of the basis for the hearing examiner siding with the City is the claim that the "fire department" requires this connection, however the City has never said which fire department, what person, or offered any written proof of their claim. In fact, the developer has said they have written documentation from the fire marshal that states nothing of the sort, and it was pointed out to the examiner that, if that is true, the fire department has passed on two opportunities to extend NE 6`h St — when Blueberry Place was under construction, and also when the apartment complex next door was being built. We believe that the city has NE 6t' St down as a right -of- way, and simply doesn't want to change its mind. There is a strong conviction that we are faced with the old adage that you can't fight city hall. Page 2 Langley Development Group has filed an appeal with the City Council. With this letter, Blueberry Place is adding our appeal. Attached is a copy of a letter detailing our concerns sent August I to mayor, Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, which she unfortunately chose to refer back to the city planners, rather than forwarding to the city council. We hope the city council will take the time to read our letter to her, which itemizes our issues, and after doing so come to the same conclusions as we do, and allow NE 6 h St to remain as it is. The main concern is that NE 6t' St is Blueberry Place's only entrance and exit. We have no other outlet. If NE 6t' is extended we will have safety, traffic and property infringement issues that the city council will have to address. Please let me know if appearing at a city council meeting would help you in considering our appeal. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Kay Haynes President -Blueberry Place HOA 551 Elma Place NE Renton, WA 98059 cc: C. Thomas Foster, Langley Development Group Joel Paisner, Ater Wynne LLB Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Jennifer Henning, Development Services ATERWYNNE LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW August 9, 2005 HAND DELIVERED Renton City Council City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re: Honey Brooke West Preliminary Plat File Number: LUA-05-055, ECF, PP Dear City Council: Ci T 'a OF PIENTON1 ailfIG - 2005, RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Suite 5450 601 Union Street Seattle, WA 98101-2327 206-623-4711 Fax:206-467-8406 www.ater,vynne.com Joel R. Paisner E-Mail: jrp@atervynne.com On behalf of Applicant C. Thomas Foster and the Langley Development Group, Inc. ("Applicant") we are appealing the recommended conditions regarding construction of off -site road improvements for the proposed subdivision of Honey Brooke West Preliminary Plat. The Renton City Hearing Examiner's recommendation requires the Applicant to construct extensive off -site street improvements to Northeast 61b Street. The imposition of this requirement lacks any support in the record before the City Council. Additionally, the Applicant is being required to pay Traffic Mitigation Fees, on top of the road extension requirement. This constitutes double payments for traffic impact mitigation. Specifically, the Applicant appeals all findings and conclusions in the Hearing Examiner's recommendation regarding the obligation to construct the off -site road improvements along Northeast 6"' Street along the boundary of Blueberry Place. The Applicant does not own this property, and the existing design of the proposed subdivision is not dependent on access to or from Duvall Avenue along Northeast 6"' Street. The Hearing Examiner provides no specific findings that establish any basis for requiring the Applicant to construct an off -site road improvement. Although both the staff and the Hearing Examiner suggest that the City Police and Fire Marshall require it, there is nothing in the record before the City Council that supports that contention. In fact, a memorandum from the Assistant Fire Marshall in the file did not mention the need for this roadway, but simply reviewed the impact fees. Access is provided onto Hoquiam Avenue NE. Emergency access is sufficient as proposed by the Applicant. General alternative through access has already been identified by the City to go along NE 1 Oth Street. In short, it appears that the sole basis for the off -site improvements is due to some vague and unsupported goal of the City to increase connectivity between Duvall Avenue NE and Hoquiam Avenue NE. The price tag for this unsupported goal exceeds $100,000. M E N L 0 P A R K P 0 R T L A N D S E A T T L E 290600 1/]RP/102341-0000 ATE RWYN N E >_Lr Renton City Council August 9, 2005 Page 2 There was no requirement for a traffic study, and the Hearing Examiner's recommendation does not address or establish a "nexus" between the mitigation requested and the impact from development. See Nollan v. California Coastal Commission, 483 U.S. 825 (1987), and Dolan v. City of Tigard, 512 U.S. 374 (1994). The City must also demonstrate that in addition to a "nexus" that there is a "rough proportionality." This has been referred to as the "Nollan/Dolan analysis." See Benchmark Land Company v. City of Battle Ground, 146 Wn.2d 685, 49 P.3d 860 (2002). Instead, the recommendation from the Hearing Examiner simply states that the off -site road improvement must be constructed because the current Comprehensive Plan allows for it. See Finding No. 25, Recommendation of Hearing Examiner. The need for the off - site road is not demonstrated in the record before the City Council. It is not enough to simply state that things have changed over time, and the Comprehensive Plan provides a basis for off - site improvements. The city must support the imposition of off -site improvements with both the nexus and the rough proportionality. Neither exists in the record before the City Council. With the exception of the off -site road along NE 6"' Street, The Applicant accepts the other recommendations from the Renton Hearing Examiner. We Iook forward to addressing these issues on appeal before the Renton City Council. cc: Mr. C. Tho as Foster, Applicant Very truly yours, ATER W YNNE LL ier 290600 1 /JRP/102341-0000 CITY OF RENTON -Sr Hearing Examiner Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Fred J. Kaufman September 19, 2005 C. Thomas Foster Langley Development Group, Inc. 6450 Southcenter Blvd., Ste. 106 Seattle, WA 98188 Re: Honey Brooke West Preliminary Plat, LUA-05-055, ECF, PP Dear Mr. Foster: This office has received a Request for Reconsideration of Condition 3 of its recommendation to the City Council on the Honey Brooke Plat. As noted in Finding 31 of the report of this office issued on July 26, 2005, the applicant had applied for modification of a street development requirement and that request was formally denied. An appeal process was noted in the denial including an appeal date. The applicant did not apparently pursue a timely appeal. The City as part of its preliminary review of the plat with input by the Fire Department determined that the applicant would have to develop a portion of public right-of-way from the applicant's western boundary toward Duvall Avenue NE. The section in question is already a dedicated publicly owned right-of-way. The applicant is not required to secure ownership nor dedicate it to the City. As noted in Finding 31 the current development pattern on the applicant's property amounted to eight homes on generally widely spaced parcels. The current proposal would add an additional 43 homes for a total of 51 homes. The lots would be, in general, substantially smaller with narrower yards resulting in homes that are much closer to each other than the existing situation. It appears that the Fire Department required this connection. The main fire apparatus would have to approach the site from the west in general. Finding 31 notes that a more direct route and "faster emergency response" to the site would be via DuvalI and the prorosed extension, to 6th and to the subject site than would be provided by SE 121st Street if Hoquiam or NE 4th were blocked. After the modification request was denied and the applicant did not appeal that denial, the City, it would appear, proceeded on the knowledge that the connection would be provided as a matter of life safety. Since there was no appeal and it appeared that the applicant would provide the connection, there was no reason for the ERC (Environmental Review Committee) to revisit the need or. requirement for the connection in its review or its additional list of necessary environmental mitigation measures. Since no appeal was filed from the City's administrative determination to deny the modification to open a connection west along 6th, the applicant lacks the ability to re -raise the issue at a hearing on the other issues relating to this plat. Life and property would be protected by a faster response time to the subject site served by the connection required by the Fire Department. 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425) 430-6515 R E N T O N This paper contains 50 % recycled material, 30 % post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE C. Thomas Foster Honey Brooke West Preliminary Plat Page Two There is no reason to alter the recommendation to the City Council. If this decision is unsatisfactory, it may be appealed to the City Council within 14 days of this decision. (This office notes that an appeal was simultaneously submitted and it remains effective). If this office can provide any further assistance, please feel free to write. Sincerely, Fred Kaufman - Hearing Examiner City of Renton FK/nt cc: Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Neil Watts, Development Services Jennifer Henning, Development Services Michael Chen, Core Design, Inc. All parties of record July 26, 2005 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON Minutes APPLICANT: C. Thomas Foster Langley Development Group, Inc. 6450 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 106 Seattle, WA 98188 OWNERS: Jerry/Julie Madison, 569 Hoquiam Ave. NE, Renton 98059 Norman/Tracy Lane, 14106 SE 124`h St., Renton 98059 James/Yoko Johnson, 519 Hoquiam Ave NE, Renton 98059 Michael/Josette Hertel, 4912 NE 51h St., Renton 98059 Robert Dykeman, 4925 NE 6'h St., Renton 98059 Kathleen Christianson, 5004 NE 5,h St., Renton 98059 Michael/Cheryl Brown, 4930 NE 51h St., Renton 98059 Susie Bush, 4930 NE 5th St., Renton 98059 Henry/Ruth L. Mead, 552 Hoquiam Ave. NE, Renton 989059 CONTACT: Michael Chen Core Design Inc. 14711 NE 29'h Place, #101 Bellevue, WA 98007 Honey Brooke West Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA 05-055, ECF, PP LOCATION: 500-600 block of Hoquiam Avenue NE SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Approval for a 5l-lot subdivision of an 8.3-acre site intended for detached single-family residences. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve subject to conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on July 5, 2005. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area; the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the July 12, 2005 hearing. The legal record is recorded on CD. The hearing opened on Tuesday, July 12, 2005, at approximately 9:29 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. _Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. Honey Brooke West Prelimma, Plat File No.: LUA-05-055, F.CF, PP July 26, 2005 Page 2 The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No. 2: Neighborhood Detail Map application, proof of posting, proof of publication and other documentation ertinent to this re uest. -----------p-- ---eg1e- Exhibit No. 3: Preliminary Plat Plan — Exhibit No. 4: Preliminary Grading and Utility Plan Exhibit No. 5: Boundary and Topographic Survey Exhibit No. 6_Lonin&Map_ Exhibit No. 7: Environmental Review Committee Exhibit No. 8: Revised Preliminary Plat Plan Mitigation Measures Exhibit No. 9: Aerial photograph of the site in 2003 Exhibit No. 10: Blueberry Place Plat Plan showing sewer Placement Exhibit No. 11: Series of photographs surrounding Exhibit No. 12: Large Plat Map from Blueberry Place Blueberry Place Exhibit No. 13: Memorandum from City of Renton Fire Marshal The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Susan Fiala, Senior Planner, Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98055. The site is located in the eastern portion of the City of Renton. The site is to the north of NE 41h Street and to the west of floquiam Ave NE. The city limits are the northem boundary property line of the subject site, which is zoned R-8. The site to the north, which is in King County, is called the Hoquiam Annexation and is currently being processed. To the west of the site is Blueberry Place, zoned R-14 and are townhomes, to the south of the site is the Windsong single family subdivision. The site is 8.3 acres, 51 lots and two tracts. Tract A is a storm drainage tract located in the southwest portion of the site. The site slopes to the southwest at a 7% grade at that point. Tract B is a narrow strip of land along Road B, a loop street system within the plat. The site will be accessed primarily from tloquiam Avenue NE, (labeled as Road A) as well as NE 6'h Street (Road C on the north part of the plat) which will also gain access to floquiam Avenue NE. There is no connection currently to Duvall Avenue, west of the plat, NE 6'h Street would be stubbed with 20-feet of pavement and sidewalk to Duvall Avenue NE. The Examiner stated that there was an issue with the extension of NE 6'h Street. He inquired as to how the road connected, if it was a public road. Ms. Fiala stated that there is an existing public right-of-way for NE 6'h Street, which goes to the western boundary of this site. That is 30-feet of dedicated right-of-way to the City, making it public access all the way through. The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non -Significance -- Mitigated (DNS-M) with five mitigation measures. No appeals were filed. Honey Brooke West Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-05-055, ECF, PP July 26, 2005 Page 3 The site does comply with the land use and community design elements of the Comprehensive Plan Criteria. The proposed net density of 7.9 dwelling units per acre does comply with the land use requirements of the R-8 zone. A conceptual landscape plan for all of the non -arterial streets within the plan, and along Hoquiam Avenue NE, will be required as a condition of preliminary plat approval. All lots comply with lot dimension requirements. Setbacks were shown on the plat plan and all lots appear to comply with the setback requirements. These standards will be verified prior to the issuance of individual building permits. Eight single-family residences and several outbuildings exist on the site. The house on new Lot 51 will remain within the plat and the remaining seven residences, sheds and garages will be removed/demolished to accommodate the plat. There were a couple of issues relating to NE 61h Street, first the continuation and connection to Hoquiam Avenue NE. The property to the north is currently in King County but undergoing the annexation process. The applicant has provided a letter from the property owner that they would, until such time as the annex, grant an easement to this portion of the road and when the annexation is completed, it would be dedicated to the City. This would be half street improvements for 35-feet of right-of-way with 28 feet of pavement. The portion that is in King County is approximately 30-feet in width. The issue with the extension of NE 6"' Street to the west, staff recommends as a condition of approval that the road be extended to Duvall with 20-feet of pavement and a pedestrian sidewalk. A homeowner's association or maintenance agreement will be established for all common improvements including those relating to access easement, utility easements, and sensitive area tracts. Traffic, Fire and Park Mitigation Fees have been unposed on the project. The site is located within the Renton School District and they have indicated that they would be able to handle the additional students. The storm drainage tract (Tract A) is located in the southwest portion of the site. It is required to be designed to Level 2 flow Control and Basic Water Quality. Core Design were the original engineers for the Blueberry Place development and have confirmed that the proposed utility extensions were anticipated in the original design of the utilities that serve Blueberry Place and were designed to receive flows from the upstream project when it was developed. The proposed development is within the water service area of Water District 90. The applicant has not submitted a Certificate of Water Availability with the land use application. Existing and new hydrants are required to be retrofitted with Storz "quick disconnect" fittings. The existing sanitary sewer is physically located on Blueberry Place and is a City of Renton sanitary sewer main. It is owned, operated and maintained by the City. The sewer main is located in a 15-foot sanitary sewer easement. Individual side sewers will be required to be installed to serve the new lots. Michael Chen, Core Design Inc_, 14711 NE 29"' Place, 4101, Bellevue, WA 98007 stated that he is the planner for the project and they concur with staff recommendations with the exception of No. 3, regarding the NE Oh extension. First the environmental constraints that are present on -site just to the west and other reasons which the applicant representatives will testify to later on. Jim Hansen, 17446 Mallard Cove Lane, Mount Vernon, WA 98274 stated that he is a planning consultant working with the applicant and -as far as the NE 6"' extension to Duvall Ave, the City has had a requirement for Honey Brooke West Preliminary Plat File No.: I.UA 05 055, FVF, PP July 26, 2005 Page 4 many years to improve public right-of-way adjacent to development. When Blueberry Place was developed only a very small portion of NE 6°i Street was developed as part of that plat. When the apartment complex to the north of Blueberry Place was developed the City did not require them to extend NE 6'h as would have been appropriate at that time. In the preliminary plat and site approval for the Blueberry Place townhomes, the Examiner's findings and conclusions stated that the topography and wetland features defeat the creation of a street grid system. At the intersection of Duvall Avenue and NE 6'h there was a wetland that runs north/south along Duvall, Blueberry Place crossed that wetland with a very narrow city street improvement, they did not complete a full street section. The apartments to the north abut this right-of-way and they were not required by the City to put in any street improvements along the NE 6'h right-of-way. Blueberry Place was not required to extend NE 6'h to the east property line because at the far east end there is a slope that is approximately 28%. It would seem appropriate that if Blueberry Place was not required to install NE 6°i because of these features, then this project should not be expected to extend the road at this time. Joel Paisner, AterWynne LLP, Attorneys at Law, 601 Union Street, Ste. 5450, Seattle, WA 98101 stated that they had submitted a letter to the Examiner via fax. It appears that the Examiner has seen the letter, as well, as copy was presented to Ms. Fiala this morning. The Examiner stated that a modification has been requested and an appeal period established back in February and no one seems to have followed up on appealing the denial of the modification for the extensions of NE 61h. Raising it now, takes people slightly off guard, the land use is before us today and it seems that staff may not have had an opportunity to review the letter. Mr. Paisner confirmed that they had had discussions with staff regarding this issue in the last week. There was an appeal filed in this matter by the applicant, it was, however, one day late. It was not timely filed, but what he would like to focus on is this condition that he was led to believe was not imposed pursuant to the environmental review and DNS-M that was issued, rather was placed there as part of a plat condition. The applicant has been concerned about this off -site requirement throughout the project given the cost of it, the case law and code provide strong legal basis for rejecting this requirement on the development. There is a policy in the staff report that states that new streets should be designed to provide convenient access and a choice of roads between homes and parks, schools, shopping and other community destinat ons. There is a desire by the City to increase connectivity between Iioquiam and Duvall, however, that connectivity is being pursued and provided by a cross street at NE 10'h, that discussion is also on the record before the Examiner. There is a letter submitted by Core Design to Kayren Kittrick, in it the engineers of record for the applicant have requested that this condition for off -site improvements to NE 61h be deleted. In the staff report it further stated that it is firmly believed that the road is desirable and required at this location to serve the residents in the vicinity as well as provide further access for emergency services. What is the basis in fact for requiring this development to complete and construct a roadway that does not serve this development? This development has been required to obtain further right-of-way that abuts it to the north and the applicant has done that to provide access. There is access within the plat directly to Hoquiam Avenue, there is no question about emergency access, there is sufficient access to this development. The City needs to show that there is an impact caused by this development, that the mitigation required of the developer is proportional to that impact. if there is no impact and there is nothing in the record before the Examiner for that impact, then there cannot be a basis to impose this expensive fix on the developer. The applicant is already paying impact fees and without more proof, there is no reason for the developer to incur further costs in improving an off -site roadway. ifoney Brooke West Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-0S 055, F:('F, PP July 26, 200S Page 5 Gerald Stu_mIP, 28609 SE 258"' Street, Ravensdale, WA 98051 stated that he is one of the partners in the Langley Development Group and regarding the water availability, he has spoken to the Water District Manager and the letter of water availability will be available today or tomorrow morning. They are currently replacing all the water mains on Hoquiam as part of the project before the Examiner today. Kay Haynes, 551 Elrna Place NE, Renton 98059 stated that she is the President of the Blueberry Place Homeowners Association. The NE 6"' Street is their primary concern, however, there are a couple other issues she brought forward. The ERC when reviewing Honey Brooke West development failed to take into consideration that a community that lies in its path would be severely impacted if all that is being proposed is approved. The objections concern the loss of the mature firs that frame and define Blueberry Place, the option to attach a sewer line on homeowner property within the complex, and most importantly extending their entrance on NE Oh Street to connect to Hoquiam Avenue NE. The developer is proposing to clear the plat of all vegetation including all of the firs. Under the Consistency with Preliminary Plat Criteria in the Staff Report there is a policy that states that existing mature vegetation and distinctive trees should be retained and protected in developments. Blueberry residents request that as many firs as possible be saved and if the trees are left in groupings and not singles, there is no danger of them being weakened. There are also concerns over property values with the loss of these trees, as well the loss of privacy and drainage issues because of the development. They would like to see tall attractive fencing along the entire property line and steps taken to ensure that hillsides are protected from the possibility of landslides due to loss of root structure from any tree removal. As to the sewer line, Mr. Foster indicated that sewer lines would only be on the Honey Brooke West side, there was never any mention of coming into Blueberry Place to connect the sewer line. This option is unacceptable and unnecessary. And finally, the most serious concern, the NE 6"' Street extension; the plan to extend NE 6"' will have the greatest effect on the Blueberry Place development. The City in its determination to connect the drive has failed to consider many factors. They question whether any studies have been done to determine the feasibility, cost and necessity for extending the drive and what the impact would be to Blueberry Place residents during construction. NE 6'h is a dead end for Blueberry Place, it is a gated community and there is no other entrance or exit. If NE 6'h is extended it will be an access not only for Honey Brooke but for everyone along Hoquiam and all the side streets feeding into it. Traffic will only increase as the area grows. Stop signs would need to be installed at the entrance for the safety of Blueberry Place residents. Two quick and easy accesses from iloquiam to Duvall already exist; one via NE 121" Street and NE 118"' Street goes all the way to Duvall. There also would be a lot of construction noise and traffic using that road and it would be totally unnecessary to extend NE 61h. Kayren Kittrick Development Services Division stated that there is an existing easement for the sewer to the City of Renton for both water and sewer at the west end towards Duvall and sewer on the east end by the cul-de- sac in the center of Blueberry Place. It was placed with the desire to be able to extend it into future developments. There is a line existing in the easement and it goes all the way to the property line of Honey Brooke West. Hoquiam may be able to serve the site as well, it will depend on the physical constraints that are current with these things. ]'here is a current cleanout that will have to be taken out and replaced with a manhole placed on the property. Construction work required in the easement would be put back as good or better than before. I loney Brooke West Preliminary Plat File No.: Ll1A-05-055, ECT, PP July 26, 2005 Page 6 Honey Brooke West drainage will have their own detention pond designed to keep the water to pre -construction levels, it is required to drain and feed the wetland on the west side of Blueberry Place and continue south along Duvall. The water availability letter will be in today. Originally when she received the request for modification the original discussions were about the possibility, she was of the opinion that NE 61h would be difficult to put through and there had not been much interest in putting it through. NE 6°i is dedicated across the grid, King County has had it, the lip that comes up at Hoquiam is that way to match a 6"' that is across the street. it is currently under annexation at this time and it is expected to come in all at the same time. in 1997 when Blueberry Place went in, there was a property owner in the back corner that did not want a road to go through in any manner because of the same discussions the Blueberry Place homeowners have put forward. He did not want a back access to his property that might allow dumping or graffiti or just general partying on the back portion of his property. it was going to be of exceeding cost to try to put a road through there when it was over to King County. At that time it was steep and to no purpose, and that was what was presented to the Hearing Examiner. For this particular site it was considered to just bringing it down to a pedestrian access only so that there would be access to Duvall and the bus services. When that went through Fire and Police, it was very strongly opposed because of the distance they would have to go to go around if 4'h and Hoquiam had an accident and something occurred within this plat, they would have to go up to SF, 121" or 1 18'h which is an additional thousand feet and seven hundred feet requires a secondary access, as opposed to having a shorter response time via NE 6'h Thert was no objection to it being 20 feet wide, which meets their minimum standard, it also meets the minimum standard code. That is what this was based on. There is a fire service entrance to Blueberry Place at the south end of the plat, it was constructed at the same time with the 30-foot wide easement that the City maintains at that location. it was known that something would go through on NE Oh someday, it could have been another 10 years, it was not known what the annexation process would be. Twenty feet wide will serve as it's own traffic calming effect, there will be people that will find it, but it is not going to be as easily found or known as a main roadway. The City generally does not require fencing between like uses, that is usually decided between the property owners themselves. The trees will be closely looked at to make sure that the grading plans will not cause unstable conditions and that the safety of all homeowners will not be compromised. Stop signs for either side of the entrance to Blueberry Place would have to be studied and reviewed by the Transportation Division as to whether it works, speed bumps are becoming a popular item to deter the casual driver. The road must be built within the existing right-of-way, the City has no easement off of that 30-foot right-of-way. That 20-foot road would have to build within the 30-foot easement. George Townley, 580 Elma Place NE, Renton 98059 stated that he is a resident of Blueberry Place and that regarding police and fire access, there are existing homes in the area and the accessibility for police and fire would be the same after the new construction as it is currently. Robert Haynes, 551 Elma Place NE, Renton 98059 stated that in looking at the photograph of 6`' NF,, there is a truck at the entrance to Blueberry Place, the person in the truck is pushing the button to open the gates. Twenty feet is not wide enough, in fact, the actual measurernent of the road is 19 feet 2 inches. There will be a back of cars going through on NE 6'h if someone is trying to enter Blueberry Place and waiting for the gates to open. I lone, [ifooke west Pruliminary Plat File No.: LUA 05 055, ECF, PP July 26, 2005 Page 7 M_r_Paisner. further stated that Core design shows on the plat map that there is an existing fence on the property, that may answer some questions of the residents. It does appear that the key issue seems to be the requirement for the applicant to construct a roadway off -site, it feels like the City is tacking on this obligation to the development before you after the fact. When this plat was originally submitted to the City it provided what the City at that point allowed adequate access, as well as emergency access, to Hoquiam Avenue with the condition that certain roadway be dedicated upon annexation. Now the City comes and says that the Fire and Police Departments really want this road, again looking at the record, there was no traffic study requested. The DNS was not appealed and the applicant strongly wants that condition deleted, but they also want the Examiner to make a decision and not delay this matter any further. If they were anticipating this, the staff would have put something before the Examiner that would have provided the basis for imposing the condition. The Examiner asked why some of the trees along the west boundary could not be retained particularly if there are slope issues and the properties down slope might be jeopardized or to the west of the site? David Caton, Core Design, 14711 NE 29°i Place, #101, Bellevue, WA 98007 stated that this site has a 60-foot drop from the NE corner to the SW corner. On the preliminary grading plan they do show grading two to one slope to the rear of the lots down to the westerly neighbors at Blueberry Place. It appears that the applicant would like to keep as many trees as possible, however, to get the road system in with the grading that is necessary it is not going to be possible to keep all the trees. The -Exam iner stated that the Comprehensive Plan suggests that natural features including topography and trees be incorporated into plats and not everything be taken and turned into a ballpark or level playing field. Yet, we still wind up with extensive grading particularly at the margins of sites which creates awkward interfaces. Mr. Cayton stated that there are more and more of these projects as the lots are getting smaller and the value of the land has increased. That land is too valuable to leave it open. It is developable land and they're only certain parcels that can be developed to this density. The Examiner stated that it is still possible to take advantage of the natural slope and build daylight basements and change the design of the homes. Accommodate the homes to the land rather than the land to the homes. Mr. Ca on stated that there is a market of homebuyers and if the developers can build daylight basements and sell them, then they probably would do so. The trees are shown on the original grading and utility plan. The existing slopes are not severe, but the grading in order to create a level pad to build a home on is created steeper slopes on the plat. Regarding the extension of 6"' NE, there is about a 20-foot drop in the last hundred feet of that site, it is substantial. Given the steepness of the road and the limited width of the right-of-way there would be retaining walls approximately eight feet high on one side or the other that would be about 20-feet from existing townhomes. There would also be an issue of stormwater coming from that road that would be unable to be drained back into the pond so an additional storm water system would have to be constructed for that piece of road. Janine Mitchell, 4828 NE 5°i Court, Renton, WA 98059 stated that her property is in the northeast corner of Blueberry Place, there is a very steep hill with a fence at the top of her lot with the hill continuing upward. There are a lot of trees and blackberry bushes in that area, even with the amount of foliage on that hillside, the Honey Brooke West Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-05-055, F.CF, PP July 26, 2005 Page 8 amount of water that comes down her side of the hill rather than going south into the drainage pond, is substantial. Mrs. Haynes further stated that it is very likely that with all that is going to go on with the removal of the trees and the expansion of 6" Street that there is a likelihood of decreased property values. The area is in high demand now, but who know what will happen with the construction. Mrs. Haynes was also concerned that Ms. Kittrick was trying to minimize what the impact of that street would be as far as people finding it. if the street was completely finished and opened up, it would be extremely easy for anyone in the area to find and use. Honey Brooke West would certainly increase the use of the street. There will be more developments built in the area, the traffic would increase with each new development. if there is going to be only one way out, and additional traffic going back and forth, there need to be some safeguard for ease of the Blueberry Place residents to get in and out of their development. Jim Hansen, stated that Ms. Kittrick quoted a code section where a 20-foot minimum paving and sidewalk. Hoquiam already meets that requirement and with the new developments there will be a walkway on Hoquiam. hie does not believe that the code intends that every possible connection from every plat has to be extended to an arterial. Kayren Kittrick stated that the Fire Marshal was adamant that 6`h should be there. The grid stands unless staff says otherwise, they must prove their case if it is not to go through. They are also required to comply with State and Court enforced decisions about plat connections. Mr. Paisner presented a July 28, 2004 memo between the Sr. Planner (Susan Fiala) and Jim Gray, Assistant Fin Marshal, which was written as part of a pre -application process. The Fire Department comments were 1-4, which had to do with a fire mitigation fee which should satisfy the City for all off -site improvements. These conditions from the Assistant Fire Marshall should satisfy the Examiner's concerns. Richard Nelson, 522 Elma Place NE, Renton, WA 98059 stated that his concern deals with the fact that he has three tall pine trees in his back yard, and if all the trees behind him are ripped out, what effect is that going to have on his trees on his property. Will it weaken them? Or will they remain stable? The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at approximately 1 l :12 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: The applicant, C. Thomas Foster for the Langley Development Group, Inc., filed a request for a Preliminary Plat. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #l. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official issued a Determination of Non -Significance - Mitigated (DNS-M). Honey Brooke West Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-05-055. ECF, PP July 26, 2005 Page 9 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. The subject site is located in the 500 to 600 blocks of Hoquiam Avenue NE. The subject site is located on the west side of Hoquiam one block north of the major NE 4th Street arterial. Duvall Avenue NE is located west of the subject site. 6. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of single-family uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. The subject site is currently zoned R-8 (Single Family - 8 dwelling units/acre). The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 4924 enacted in Dec:.mber 2001. 9. The subject site consists of ten underlying parcels. The total site is approximately 8.33 acres or 362,943 square feet. The subject site has regular or linear boundaries along the north, west and south but a number of third party property shares the Hoquiam frontage with the subject site. The parcel is approximately 633 feet deep (east to west) by approximately 656 feet wide. It has three doglegs out to Hoquiam varying from 30 feet along its south margin to 42feet in the middle of the frontage. 10. An existing home located in the southeast corner of the subject site would be retained on what would be Proposed Lot 51. Seven other existing homes and a variety of outbuildings would be removed if the plat is approved. 11. The subject site slopes toward the southwest. The site has an overall slope of approximately seven percent (7%). A drainage Swale is located in the southwest corner but no critical areas are located on site. 12. The applicant proposes removing all vegetation from the site to develop the roads, driveways and building pads. Neighbors to the west suggested that the trees give the area a unique character and provide a visual buffer. The neighbors are also concerned that if trees on the subject site were removed, their trees would now be subject to buffeting winds and potential damage. 13. The applicant will be developing a series of roads to provide access to the new lots from Hoquiam. Two east -west roads will be created including NE 6th Street along the north property line and a second road near the center of the parcel. Both of these roads will connect to a loop road that will create an interior block. NE 6th would run to the western edge of the plat. (see below for more on access) 14. The City has required the applicant to open NE 6th west of the site so that a through -connection to Duvall Avenue is created. The connection is to be 20 feet wide with a pedestrian walk. There is a dedicated public right-of-way between the western property line of the subject site and Duvall in the NE 6th alignment but a portion of it is unimproved. This unopened right-of-way runs along the east half of the north margin of the Blueberry Place development. Residents there object to the opening of the street. They have suggested that it would create too much traffic adjacent to their homes, remove trees, interfere with turning movements to NE 6th from their private roadway and will require too much gradinlo. The applicant has proposed providing a pedestrian pathway to Duvall from the subject site. 15. The main portion of the plat will have lots aligned in a north to south direction with lots on the east and west sides of the loop roadway. There will also be lots arranged east to west along the east to west Honey Firooke -Vest Preliminary Plat File No.: 1,UA-05-055, F CF. PP July 26, 2005 Page 10 roads that provide access from Hoquiam Avenue to the loop road. Proposed Lots 32, 33, 34, 36 and 37, in the southeast corner ofthe plat, will take their access from a 26-foot wide private easement. A separate dogleg to Hoquiam will provide access to Proposed Lot 35 while Proposed Lot 51 where the existing home will be retained, will front directly along Hoquiam where it will take access. 16. The applicant has agreed to align its easterly end of NE 6th Street with the segment of NE 6th Street east of Hoquiam. This alignment will require the cooperation of the owner of property north of the subject site since the roadway will have to swing slightly north at it approaches Hoquiam. The property north is located in unincorporated King County and is proposed for annexation. The applicant indicated that the owner would dedicate the roadway alignment upon annexation. The City wants assurances that the roadway will be a dedicated, public road developed in conjunction with the subject plat. 17. Staff noted that for drainage and other purposes, appropriate frontage improvements will be required along Hoquiam including along frontage that is not owned by the applicant even if this would lead to some discontinuous improvements. 18. The density for the plat would be 7.9 which is just shy of the 8 dwelling units per acre permitted in the -none. This is the result of subtracting the public roadways (79,180 square feet) and the private easements (3,559 square feet) from the total acreage. 19. The subject site is located within the Renton School District. The project is expected to generate approximately 22 or 23 school age children. These students would be spread across the grades and would be assigned on a space available basis. The school district did note that Hazen High School is nearing capacity and McKnight Middle School is at capacity. 20. The development will generate approximately 10 vehicle trips per unit or approximately 510 trips for the 51 single-family homes. Approximately ten percent of the trips, or approximately 51 additional peak hour trips will be generated in the morning and evening. 21. 'The applicant proposes grading the entire site and, as noted, removing all the vegetation. Neighbors living west of the site are concerned that grading will affect the physical margins of their property as wel I as the visual aspects. There is an existing fence along the western edge of the subject site. 22. Staff has recommended a gravity sewer for the site and it may be served along Hoquiam or to the west through the Blueberry Place complex. Neighbors were concerned that a sewer line across Blueberry Place might be used to serve the new plat. The line is there and is located in an easement to the City. Restoration of landscaping would be required if access is needed and the existing landscaping is disturbed. The easement was intended to be used as part of the storm water system (see below) as well as the sanitary sewer system. 23. Stormwater would be directed to a combination detention and wet pond located in the southwest corner of the plat in Tract A. It would have Level 2 Flow Control and basic water quality treatment. The pond is designed for 97,386 cubic feet of live storage. It will then be conveyed to a catch basin in Blueberry Place that was designed to handle water from upstream systems such as this one. It will recharge wetlands on the west. Staff has recommended full screening with landscaping that will provide a dense screen within 3 years. They also have recommended fencing around the perimeter in material other than chainlink and a decorative entry gate along the road. 24. Water would be provided by Water District 90. 'The applicant has submitted a letter of availability demonstrating that domestic water from the district can be provided. Honey Brooke West Preliminary Plat File No.: l.l!A 0S 055, E:,UF, PP July 26, 2005 Page 1 1 The Unopened Segment of NE 6th Street West of the Subject Site 25. The applicant introduced testimony that in approving the original Orchards project, including the Blueberry Place complex, the Hearing Examiner and the City Council found that a roadway extension of NE 6th was not pursued due to topography and wetland issues. There was the following language in that decision: "With this in mind, the applicant has proposed a private street system which is not entirely in keeping with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan." (Page 19, The Orchards; LUA-96- 010). As that language notes, the proposed private road system was not in keeping with the Comprehensive Plan in effect at that time. The current comprehensive plan still favors grid street systems and new code requires a grid and special finding if a street grid is not established (Section 4-7- 150(E)). In 1996 staff was concerned that a deadend stub would become a dumping ground and that there would be jurisdictional questions with the then adjoining King County boundary. In the ten years since that decision was made, conditions have changed. The subject property is now within the City, additional housing has been developed east of the subject site and NE 6th Street has been extended in a grid pattern east of the subject site and Hoquiam, and the applicant proposes developing 51 homes where 8 homes now stand. The Fire Department believes that the roadway extension west to Duvall is warranted for emergency access. 26. It was noted that 20 feet of pavement would have traffic calming effects thereby slowing speeds. Whether stop signs or other limits are necessary, at the Blueberry Place access roadway, would be determined. 27. The applicant argues that the time to have sought the through access was when the property along its frontage was developed, that is when Blueberry Place and an apartment complex to the north were developed. The applicant maintains that the route is not necessary and imposing the costs associated with creating a paved route on this current applicant would be inappropriate. 28. If the need for the access were one of life safety then requiring the access would be appropriate. if the need for the access were less demanding, "it would be nice to have" in some circumstances, then the City should bear the costs of creating it. 29. This office will take the tact that while the homeowners of Blueberry Place might find the access objectionable, they themselves benefit every day from roads that pass by others' homes. The community as a whole is better served by a grid system that allows both residents and emergency services to find the quickest route or in emergency situations, the only route. Clearly, being located on a through street creates impacts and other residents of a City bear those impacts to allow traffic to flow freely. The western portion of NE 6th between Duvall and Blueberry Place is a public street. It is not a private access roadway. The unopened portion of that right-of-way east of Blueberry Place to the applicant's site is also publicly held. It may be opened if the City determines it is a necessary link in its transportation grid and can provide efficient access to not only residents but especially for emergency services such as police and fire. 30. It appears that the City did not anticipate the need for this through route when it recommended that it not be created at the time Blueberry Place was platted. That was ten years ago. Blueberry Place had its own emergency access and at that time the subject site was under King County's jurisdiction and contained only eight, widely spaced, rural homes. 31. On January 13. 2005 the applicant sought a series of modifications to streets or proposed streets or to improvements of those streets. Included in that submission was a request to modify a westerly Honey Brooke West Preliminary Plat File No.: LIIA-05-055. ECF, PP July 26, 2005 Page 12 extension of NE 6th Street from the subject site to Duvall Avenue NE. The applicant sought to eliminate the vehicular portion and instead create a pedestrian link. A request was also submitted to narrow that portion of NE 6th Street not coinciding with a new loop roadway. On January 28, 2005 the modifications discussed above were denied. An appeal date was established if the decision on these and the other modifications was found unsatisfactory. The applicant did not appeal the decision by the administrator during the time period set out in the letter denying the appeal. The appeal process would have been the preferred manner of attempting to reverse the decision regarding the westerly extension of NE 6th Street. The fact is that raising it at the public hearing, without benefit of prior notic.,would not provide the City an opportunity to counter the arguments. The applicant did not appeal the denial in a timely fashion nor raise it in an appropriate manner. Be that as it may, it appears that the City has determined that a through link is necessary to provide adequate service to the new plat. Currently, there are or were only eight widely separated single-family homes. As proposed there will be 51 single- family homes with substantially less separation between sidewalls. There will be substantially more population and at approximately 10 vehicle trips per home per day, a change in vehicle trips from approximately 80 trips to 500 trips. A through link will provide a faster emergency response route if Hoquiam and NE 4th are blocked than would SE 121st Street north of the site. The modification was denied and at this junction it will be up to the Fire Department to determine to whether the through street is required. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed plat, in general, appears to serve the public use and interest. It provides additional housing choices in an area where urban services are available or can be extended from nearby utility lines. In addition, in some respects, surrounding development was designed to accommodate this plat i, terms of stormwater control and conveyance and sanitary sewer connections. The development of the subject site with new housing is compatible with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan which designate the area for additional detached single family uses. 2. As noted, the plat of Blueberry Place, downhill from the subject site, was designed to potentiaily deal with gravity flows of both stormwater and sanitary sewerage. That does not mean such exiensions might not affect those living in Blueberry Place but any disturbances will be temporary and restoration of landscaping or hardscaping would be required by the applicant or City. 3. The proposed lots are rectangular and with the exception of a few interior lots, will have access directly to the proposed street system. The lots appear to meet the standards for size and setbacks for both interior and corner lots. 4. The road system appears suitable for internal circulation in the new plat. The connections required by the City to the arterial systems will provide access for routine traffic as well as emergency traffic. The alignment of the eastern segment of NE 6th Street will require cooperation from an adjacent property owner. This will require a publicly owned street as part of this development. Similarly, within the Ili -nits of the applicant's ability, Hoquiam will need street improvements even if they are, for the moment, non-contiguous. The Comprehensive Plan suggests in Policy CD-45 that mature and distinctive vegetation be retained and doing so in this case would preserve a buffer between the subject site and the westerly properties. It would also reduce the amount of grading that occurs at the boundary between adjacent properties. Preserving trees would also take pressure off the trees located along the eastern edge of the adjoining lots. Therefore, the applicant will be required to protect trees along the westernmost 5 to 10 feet of its Honey Brooke West Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-05-055, FCF, PP July 26, 2005 Page 13 site. Grading and clearing can occur outside of this range. An arborist selected with the City's approval can determine the boundary of tree protection. 6. Code changes reflect the need for additional street trees and landscaping. These now need to be incorporated into this plat. 7. Development of the subject site will increase the tax base of the City. The applicant will be paying mitigation for some of its impacts on parks and fire offsetting those impacts. The traffic will increase substantially from approximately 80 to 500 trips per day and appropriate roads are necessary to handle this increase. in conclusion, the City Council should approve the proposed plat with the conditions suggested by staff to allow it to meld and mesh with the surrounding uses and needs. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should approve the 51-lot Preliminary Plat subject to the following conditions: l . The applicant shall obtain a demolition permit and complete all inspections and approvals for all buildings located on the property prior to the recording of the final plat. The satisfaction of this requirement is subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Project Ma:!ager. 2. The applicant shall submit a conceptual landscape plan for the five-foot landscape strop as prepared by a registered landscape architect, or a certified nurseryman, or other similarly qualified professional to the Development services Project Manager for review and approval prior to recording of the final plat. 3. Since the modification was denied and not appealed in a timely fashion the applicant shall install a 20- foot width of pavement and a pedestrian sidewalk within the NE 6'h Street right-of-way abutting Blueberry Place prior to recording of the final plat. The satisfaction of this requirement is subject to the review and approval of the Renton Fire Department. 4. A homeowner's association or maintenance agreement shall be created concurrently with the recording of the final plat in order to establish maintenance responsibilities for all shared improvements. A draft of the document(s), if necessary, shall be submitted to the City of Renton Development Services Division for review and approval by the City Attorney and Property Services section prior to recording of the final plat. 5. NE 6'h Street right-of-way along the plat's entire frontage shall be dedicated at the time of recording of the final plat. The satisfaction of this requirement is subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Project Manager. 6. Tract A shall be fenced, landscaped, and irrigated (unless drought tolerant plants are used). the property lines of Tract A fronting Road B, Lots 9 and 28 shall include a landscaped visual barrier so as to not interfere with sight distance triangles including plant materials which would provide a year round dense screen within three (3) years from the time of planting. Tract A property lines to the west, south and along Lots 9 and 23 are to be fenced with a six-foot high solid wood fence, or other approved material (no chain link). Tract A fronting Road B shall be fenced with either a wrought iron, or chain link with vinyl covering, or other decorative wood fence. The applicant shall submit a landscape plan and fence design identifying construction and plant materials for the review and approval of the I Ioney Brooke West Preliminary Plat File No.: L1A-05-055, ECF, PP July 26, 2005 Page 14 Development Services Project Manger prior to installation. Fences and landscaping shall be installed prior to recording of the final plat. The applicant shall comply with the conditions imposed by the ERC. The applicant shall preserve trees along the westernmost 5 to 10 feet of its site. Grading may occur outside of this range. An arborist selected with the City's approval shall determine the boundary of tree protection within the westernmost 5 to 10 feet. ORDERED THIS 26'11 day of July 2005. FRED J. KAUF HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 261h day of July 2005 to the parties of record: Susan Fiala 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Kayren Kittrick 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 David Cayton Core Design, Inc. 14711 NE 29" PI., Ste. 101 Bellevue, WA 98007 Janine Mitchell 4828 NE 5"' Court Renton, WA 98059 Michael Chen Core Design, Inc. 14711 NE 29'h PI., Ste. 101 Bellevue, WA 98007 Jim Hansen 17446 Mallard Cove Lane Mount Vernon, WA 98274 George Townley 580 Elma Place NE Renton, WA 98059 Richard Nelson 522 Elma Place NE Renton, WA 98059 TRANSMITTED THIS 261h day of July 2005 to the following: Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Julia Medzegian, Council Liaison Larry Warren, City Attorney Gregg Zimmerman, PBPW Administrator Alex Pietsch, Economic Development Jennifer Henning, Development Services Stacy Tucker, Development Services Joel Paisner AterWynne LLP 601 Union Street, Ste. 5450 Seattle, WA 98101 Gerald Stump 28609 SE 258`' Street Ravensdale, WA 98051 Robert and Kay Haynes 551 Elma Place NE Renton, WA 98059 Stan Engler, Fire Larry Meckling, Building Official Planning Commission Transportation Division Utilities Division Neil Watts, Development Services Janet Conklin, Development Services King County Journal Honey Brooke West Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-05-055, ECF, PP July 26, 2005 Page 15 Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section I OOGof the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writinp, on or before 5:00 p.m., August 9, 2005. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, cr the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. An appeal must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., August 9, 2005. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants, the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processinp_ of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision -maker concerning the proposal. Decision -makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public_ This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebir. the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. ------ ---- x1W �-� r: rr rr rr r; rr rr rr rr rr rr ,r �- �- �----• �- �- �- �----� �----� MU i� szp �0 ul m S m `' IY coca y B •' f �t6 �� p d F �" w _HONEY BROOKE WEST CORE LANGLEYDEVELOPMENTGROUP, INC a " 4r ° O1,9dNN.u'P. lA Rn2 PL 6.SG RVnKZNRR B[aD- Stll£ I[K ; `�GESfGN ��_ �� --- ^�-� zQ(1118173 SfC.10 YWP.23h. E. W.M. 1 AATIJM II i BASIS OF BEARING& . . 1 1� w1•Ip,V MIYDM �/,� •.4DY � �� ' 1��.rM�^" ;%�'�' __ �: f Z .�M Dt,It MIIM l+11•P.YD YG,Iea � SENCNMARK&• .� _ ... f- ` t 1 � t : qq rTw n,s o ww+,e. •.,.,r ew ww w o.nn ep,� •' 'I ` •r w t I {. '� ! I: c"°awWiwisi��rt.mirn a�i.si•i�ii ii '�(V � Jt IQ ' ' ; I f .�. >! ; � I � r•'r. � .a � I � F� , :r .ia;,iruwii,n�i.,� �j'^r�� SCALE: 1' 40' • Y M1,IW.TtlwMLL.ItY,f. Yp MM.N .1 kill �I. � Y-W .:I• ' WM.,d f1.l0.I�l,wlf 1 j'�• + � :,n ��' �e r � ,.,. '� � . ''� i� �. � LEGEND yEi �� i t. �`'�,-a :.• �conwr mriRi�r�'ti`.&a?.. r'`'i'z.a, ::�N,..,.- 1 u (... � � �� .1(`'�• ._i. '��-•�.. •w�a'a�vars.wfrmr n.namrcorJ � i I sspp6 ROAD 'Cw & EASTERN L12 Of R� OA�A ^ �) _ , I � e' u• rr c� 2 2 .. �� D i ' �� . •,� !'� iw�� I', �' � ��Qi;�ixvewr mar rwonr'.�- .. � W t � I • " '� PJ Ail .,_ ROAD *A' & ROAD "S" I fi x f , ,• ( f i' a l _ ON -SITE 42' R/W SECTION z W Z C 'II{I; i�. i. � I vue+e I r nw,ra,vra r •tea' C i• v._y � �, }• ��' w.... \ '� lly'r"fi"....:` •a er w�i »� i� `� "`„ �. rr.a.,.rr,.a. 12 +L Q= I {}.•' �� t � � 1 r+.�•w `•`fit. I � �e wwDr fr "'rw"r"Ri'"* �-:� � 0 �' '. 4. 1 I '' \.�' M '• .1 � _", (� � � 11 mrmwriww>ru. o Z �'Z ids I �• „I �,I 9 HOQU/AMAVE.N.E.SECT/ON Y.vr.v. Mt- 1 1 � ie•yo�}j P�N��{.r,� r.. .. rr{'�Y ', f,i �i� � —i I—cs•worrwro .� NI a-. \y +` AR/VATEACCESSR0.4D salt :arc• or v"V q4U�L . .......... AV T44 C\2 ... ... ...... . ; CO.. ..... . . ...... co .... .... .... co .... . ..... . ............ . ............... .... . . . . . . . CO .......... ...... . ..... . ..... .. .... . ........ .. iT ......... .......... (I pu�N EN '9 AV -Lul2lnDOH I S '@AV PU2tT C HII 1A .............. ...... .... - co C\2 cc . ..... ..... !'I v..W ...... ..... - ...... ........ . try . ....... *,--* ... ..... .. . ... . ........ .. CIO co- C) T T J < ........... L), KI 'UH PAn(f U k In zi�i A NV( -L 0 k , CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA05-055, PP, ECF PROJECT NAME: Honey Brook West Preliminary Plat APPLICANT: C. Thomas Foster, Langley Development Group, Inc. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 500 - 600 Block of Hoquiam Avenue NE DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review ant Preliminary Plat approval for a 51-lot subdivision of a ten parcel, 8.3 acre site. Three tracts for open space ant storm drainage are included. The site is zoned Residential - 8 du/ac. The lots range in size from 4,500 sq. ft. tt 14,996 sq. ft. Existing buildings would be removed/demolished except for one house to remain on new Lot 51 Access is proposed via Hoquiam Ave. NE to new internal public streets and private access easements. LEAD AGENCY: The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The project shall be required to comply with the Department of Ecology (DOE) Manual for erosion and sedimentation control. 2. The project shall be designed to be in compliance with the 1998 Level 2 King County Surface Water Design I' tal for water quality treatment and detention. 3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $488.00 per new single-family lot. Credit to be given for eight existing residences. The fee shall be paid prior to the recording of the final plat. 4. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per each new average daily trip associated with the project. Credit to be given for eight existing residences. The fee shall be paid prior to the recording of the final plat. 5. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee based on $530.76 per new single-family lot. Credit to be given for eight existing residences. The fee shall be paid prior to the recording of the final plat. CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI #: :Submitting Data: For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. AJLS/City Clerk Agenda Status Staff Contact...... Bonnie Walton, x6502 Consent .............. Subject: Public Hearing... Street Vacation Petition, portion of Rosario Ave. SE Correspondence.. (Petitioner: James Jacques, File No. VAC-05-004) Ordinance ............. Resolution............ Old Business........ Exhibits: New Business....... Petition, legal and map study sessions...... Resolution setting public hearing Information......... X X X 10/24/2005 Recommended Action: Approvals: Set public hearing date of 11/21/2005, and refer to Legal Dept......... X Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator for Finance Dept...... recommendations Other ............... Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... N/A Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted.......... Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: On August 25, 2005, a petition was submitted by James Jacques, 1216 N. 381h St., Renton, requesting vacation of the easterly five feet of right-of-way on Rosario Ave. SE, north of SE 2nd Place (SE 1361h St.). The Planning/Building/Public Works Department has verified the petition documents and reports that 100% of the abutting property owners have signed the petition. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution to set a public hearing on 11/21/2005, and refer the petition to the Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator for determination of advisability of the vacation and need for retention of easements. cc Karen McFarland Reference: 35.79 RCW & RMC 9-14 PE _ ,TION FOR STREET VACAT1vVAC-os-w N CITY .� �� REN��nt IN THE CITY OF RENTON To the Honorable Mayor and Date �aD['�` ��5 `�%� Members of the City Council RECEIVED City of Renton Circulated By: JAjimg� O prc f?"t-- CLERK'S OFFICE 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Address: / 2-/ � Al 3 * /� S! Dear Mayor and Council Members: Telephone: "Y?5-- 94 / (17 C7 We, the undersigned property owners abutting a certain portion of public Right -of -Way, respectfully request the vacation of the street or alleyway as described on the attached "Exhibit A" and commonly known as:4lJ,eF- �`— (Insert closest cross streets and reference the street name, i.e. NE Bog Street from Bicycle Alley to Slalom Avenue NE.) We request a time and place be fixed when this petition will be heard by the City Council. Of the property owners abutting the area of this petition ,tp p %o l 2/3 or more requiredl of the lineal frontage have agreed and indicated their joining this petition with their signatures below: JPMiE'S `+y/ -&?69 print name phone address I yZ E3elS %nf� property identification number signature print name phone address property identification number Instructions: 1. Insert name of street. (i.e. NE 4th, alleyway east of Sunset Blvd.) 2. Attach complete legal description (i.e. metes and bounds, etc.) 3. Have the applicable property owners provide the following: a) Sign name. (Signatures of owners of 2/3 of lineal frontage must sign. Spouses do not need to sign. Owners in common must sign.) b) Print name and phone number. c) List Property address and King County tax parcel identification number. 4. Attach a map to the petition designating the vacation boundaries. 5. Attach a brief statement of the purpose to be served by the street vacation. 6. Submit $250.00 filing fee with application. SUBMIT PETITION TO THE CITY CLERK, SEVENTH FLOOR, RENTON CITY HALL. lIAFilc Sys\PRM - Property Services Administration\Administrative\Forms\Street Vacation Petition.doc — N OF SECTION V FND 3" BRASS SURFACE DISC _ (AUGUST. 2005) LOT 29 Q I vI UNPLATTED 5' JO" 30' LOT 26 25' N 88'00'19" W 274.25' -- 5' TO BE VACATED LOT 27 lyJ N :2 W LLJ N H LOT 1 OF KING COUNTY SHORT PLAT NUMBER WS N c0 484106. AS RECORDED UNDER KING COUNBTY N Z C RECORDING NO. 7505170617. h i In p Z N p SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, LOT 26 Z STATE OF WASHINGTON I R=25.00 L=38.57 Jo' Jo' Tan=24.31 Del to=88'24'15" R=25.00 L=38.57 Tan=24.31 Delto=88'24'15" ►! L5.00' N 88'00'19" W 249.94' o b N 88'00'19" w SE 136TH STREET LOT t7- ' L01 2 LOT 3 I LOT LOT 5 ( LOT 6 LOT 8 LOT 7 HIGHLAND ESTATES REC NO 200�0205000023 1 1 1 EXHIBIT "A" STREET VACATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION A STRIP OF LAND 5 FEET IN WIDTH LYING ALONG THE EASTERLY PORTION OF 152ND AVENUE SE RIGHT OF WAY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF 152ND AVENUE SE AND SE 136TH STREET, - THENCE NORTH 00023'56" EAST ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF 152ND AVENUE SE A DISTANCE OF 186.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88000' 19" EAST A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING' THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 88°00' 19" EAST A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF 152ND AVENUE SE; THENCE SOUTH 00023'56" WEST ALONG THE SAID EASTERLY MARGIN A DISTANCE OF 132.92 FEET TO A POINT ON CURVE TO THE LEFT; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET, ARC LENGTH OF 38.57 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 88.24' 15" TO A POINT OF TANGENCY, BEING A POINT ON THE NORTH MARGIN OF SE 136TH STREET, - THENCE NORTH 88000' 19" WEST ALONG SAID MARGIN A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET TO A POINT ON CURVE TO THE RIGHT; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET, ARC LENGTH OF 38.57 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 88°24'15" TO A POINT OF TANGENCY. - THENCE NORTH 00023'56" EAST A DISTANCE OF 132.92 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING SITUATED WITH THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTRY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON • Aug 2G 05 12:55p Jana 422505G p.2 August 26, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Renton 1055 S Grady Way Renton WA 98055 HANSON CONSULTING Jim Hanson 360-422-5056 Subject: Street Vacation, portion of Rosario Ave SE Dear Mayor and City Council Members: We are requesting a vacation of the easterly five feet of the right of way on Rosario Ave SE. adjacent to the parcel owned by James Jacques. The existing right of way is sixty foot in width rather than the fifty foot that is required by the City of Renton Street standards. Sufficient area for full street improvements will remain on Rosario Ave SE. The five foot vacation will allow the adjacent parcel to be over an acre in size and therefore be subdivided into four lots. All lots will comply with the minimum lot standards for the R-4 zone. Thank you for your consideration of this street vacation request. n CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, SETTING A HEARING DATE TO VACATE A PORTION OF ROSARIO AVENUE SE, NORTH OF SE 2"D PLACE. (JAMES JACQUES; VAC-05- 004) WHEREAS, a Petition has been filed with the City Clerk of the City of Renton on or about August 25, 2005, pursuant to the requirements of RCW 35.79, petitioning for the vacation of a portion of Rosario Avenue SE, as hereinafter more particularly described, and said petition having been signed by the owners of more than two-thirds (2/3) of the property abutting upon said street sought to be vacated, and same being described as follows: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. [The easterly five feet of the right-of-way on Rosario Ave. SE, north of SE 2„ d Place]. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. That the 21 st day of November, 2005, at the hour of 7:00 P.M. at the City Council Chambers at City Hall, Renton, King County, Washington, is hereby fixed as the time and place for a public hearing to consider the aforesaid Petition for vacating one portion of Rosario Avenue SE, north of SE 2" d Place, which said hearing date is not more than sixty nor less than twenty days from the date of passage of this Resolution. SECTION II. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to give notice of the time and date of this hearing as provided by RCW 35.79.020 and any and/or all persons interested therein or objecting to this vacation may then appear and be heard thereon, or they RESOLUTION NO. may file their written objections thereto with the City Clerk at or prior to the time of hearing on the vacation. SECTION III. The City Council shall determine, as provided by RCW 35.79.030, as to whether an appraisal shall be secured to determine their fair market value of the property sought to be vacated as provided for in Ordinance No. 4266, and the amount of compensation to be paid by the Petitioner -Owners to the City for such vacation. The City likewise reserves the right to retain an easement for public utility and related purposes. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES. 1139:10/ 18/05:ma Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk day of Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor 2005. 2005. 2 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Submitting Data: For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. Economic Development, October 24, 2005 Neighborhoods, and Strategic Planning Agenda Status Staff Contact...... Don Erickson, x-6581 Consent .............. X Public Hearing.. Subject: PROPOSED ANNEXATION Correspondence.. Hudson - 10% Notice of Intent Petition Ordinance ............. Certification of 10% Petition Resolution........... . Old Business........ New Business....... Exhibits: Issue Paper, Annexation Petition Certification, 10%. Study Sessions...... Petition Information........ . Recommended Action: Approvals: Council concur to set a Public Meeting date for Legal Dept......... X November 14, 2005 Finance Dept...... Other ............... Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget N/A City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The petitioners submitted a 10% Notice of Intent petition to the City Clerk on September 22, 2005, and the signatures on it were certified by the King County Department of Assessments on October 4, 2005. The proposed 13.69-acre L-shaped annexation site is located in Renton's Potential Annexation Area, along the west side of Benson Road South and the south side of SE 168' Street near the intersection of Benson Road South and SE 1681h Street. The proposed annexation would add on to an existing peninsula of City land and possibly provide opportunities for expansion before the Boundary Review Board, if Council decides to accept it. State law requires the Council to hold a public meeting with the proponents to consider their request, within 60-days of their submittal. If Council accepts the 10% Notice of Intention petition, the Administration recommends that it authorize circulation of a 60% Direct Petition, based upon assessed value. Such a petition must specify on its face that future zoning will be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and that property owners will be required to assume their fair share of the City's outstanding indebtedness, the same as other property owners. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Council set November 14, 2005, for a public meeting to consider the 10% Notice of Intention to Commence Annexation Proceedings petition and possible future zoning for the proposed Perkins Annexation. EDNSP/PAA/Annexations/Hudson Annexation/agnbill/de CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS AND STRATEGIC PLANNING DATE: TO: VIA:" FROM: STAFF CONTACT: SUBJECT: ISSI IF. - MEMORANDUM October 12, 2005 Terri Briere, Council President City Councilmembers Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Alex Pietsch, Administrator k-A',�o Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department Don Erickson (6581) Proposed Hudson Annexation 10% Notice of Intent The City is in receipt of a Notice of Intent to annex approximately 13.69-acres by the direct petition method. State law requires that the Council hold a public meeting with the annexation proponents within 60-days of receipt of a 10 % Notice of Intent petition, to decide whether to accept, reject, or geographically modify the proposal, whether to require the assumption of bonded indebtedness, and whether to require the simultaneous adoption of city zoning, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, if the proposed annexation is successful. RECOMMENDATION: On the basis of the following analysis, the Administration recommends that Council accept the 10 % Notice of Intent petition. If Council concurs, the Administration recommends that it take the following actions (pursuant to RCW 35A.14.120): • Accept the 10 % Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation Proceedings petition; • Authorize the circulation of a 60 % Direct Petition to Annex for the 13.69-acre area; and, • Require that property owners within the proposed annexation area assume their proportional share of the City's outstanding indebtedness and accept zoning consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: Proposed Hoquiam Annexation 10% Notice of Intent March 29, 2005 Page 2 The L-shaped proposed Hudson Annexation site is located along the south and west sides of the intersection of Benson Road South and 1081h Avenue SE. The proposed annexation would add on to an existing peninsula of City land that was annexed into the City in 1962, and possibly would provide opportunities for further expansion of the City's boundary to the north, creating a more reasonable service area. 1. Location: The proposed 13.69-acre, L-shaped, Hudson Annexation is bisected by 108th Avenue SE and abuts the City limits on its northern boundary. Its western boundary is 107th Avenue SE, if extended, and its eastern boundary is approximately the eastern edge of I I l th Avenue SE, if extended. Its northern boundary would be SE 166th Street, if extended, and its southern boundary would be SE 169t Street, if extended. 2. Assessed value: The 2005 assessed valuation for the subject annexation site, at current development, is $7,482,400. 3. Natural features: The site slopes downward to the southwest from Benson Road South and southeast from SE 1681h Street. The area west of 108th Avenue SE flows into the Panther Creek sub -basin and the area east of 1081h Avenue SE flows into the Soos Creek Basin. 4. Existing land uses: Existing development includes twenty single-family detached dwellings and their associated structures. Most existing development is located adjacent to SE 142"d Avenue SE (Hoquiam Avenue NE). Existing lots vary in size from a quarter of an acre up to four acres. (Figure 3, Existing Structures). 5. Existingzoning: oning_ King County zoning is R-4. County R-4 allows a base density of four units per gross acre, and up to 6 units per gross acre with incentives and transfer of density credits. This zoning is comparable to Renton's R-8 zone. 6. Comprehensive Plan: Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates the subject annexation site as Residential Single Family (RS). This designation would allow R-8 zoning at a maximum density of eight units per net acre. 7. Public services: All responding departments and divisions noted that the annexation represents a logical extension of their respective services and systems. Specific comments follow. Water Utility. The subject site is located within Water District #90's water service area, by agreement under the East King County Coordinated Water System Plan. A certificate of water availability from the District will be required prior to the issuance of development permits within the subject area, following annexation to the City. Hydrant flow test and hydraulic analysis of the District's system should also be required for new development within the annexation area. The District must provide adequate water supply and pressure for new development within the City and must meet Renton's standards for fire protection and domestic water service. Sewers. The area is not currently served by sewer. Sewer exists in the City of Renton to the west and south. The annexation site is located within the Renton Sewer Service Area Proposed Hoquiam Annexation 10% Notice of Intent March 29, 2005 Page 3 and future sewers would be extended by developer extension, as the annexation area develops. Parks. The City has a shortfall of both neighborhood and community parkland in this area. The nearest public park is Kiwanis Park, about three-quarters of a mile to the west. Maplewood Park in unincorporated King County is approximately a mile to the south. The projected prorated cost of developing parkland for future development within the annexation site, to a level consistent with the service levels in the City's Comprehensive Park, Recreation, and Open Space Plan, is an estimated $77,452. This one time estimated cost is above the estimated $55,730 the City would receive from collecting its Parks Mitigation Fee, based upon the development of 105 new homes. Fire. Fire District No. 40 currently serves the area. Upon annexation, the City would take over fire prevention and suppression services for the 13.69-acre annexation site from District No. 40. Police. With an estimated future population of approximately 317 people for this annexation, the Police Department anticipates at least 317 additional calls for service per year. Staff notes that there will eventually be a need for additional officers to serve this and other recent annexations. Surface Water. As noted above, the area west of 108th Avenue SE flows into the Panther Creek sub -basin and the area east of 1081h Avenue SE flows into the Soos Creek Basin. Apparently, existing surface water runoff is handled by open roadside ditches maintained by abutting property owners. Because of previous flooding problems in the area, staff are recommending that future development comply with the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual, Level 2, or equivalent standards. Annual maintenance costs for the existing drainage system are estimated to be approximately $658 per year. At full development, this would increase to an estimated $3,370 per year. Transportation. Staff notes that the City would likely have to take over the cost of a traffic signal and other associated improvements at the intersection of Benson Road S, 1081h Avenue SE and SE 168th Street. They also note that curbs, gutters, and sidewalks don't exist on the west side of Benson Road S north of SE 168`h Street and along the west side of 108`h Avenue SE south of SE 1681h Street. Also, existing pavement width and thickness on Benson Road and 108th Avenue SE does not meet City standards. Staff notes that upgrading these streets to City standards as well as any other roadway improvements would typically be at the expense of existing property owners and/or new development. ANALYSIS OF THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION: 1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: Renton's Comprehensive Plan annexation policies generally support this proposed annexation. The subject site is within the City's Potential Annexation Area and has been subject to development pressure under the King County Comprehensive Plan, zoning, and subdivision regulations (Policies LU-36 and LU-37). The area would also be Proposed Hoquiam Annexation 10% Notice of Intent March 29, 2005 Page 4 available for urbanization under Renton's Residential Single -Family and Residential Medium Density land use designations. Renton is the logical provider of most urban infrastructure and services to the area (Policy LU-38). Policy LU-43.1 states that, in general, the greater the contiguity with the city limits, the more favorable the annexation. The area proposed for annexation abuts the City limits along its northern boundary. This represents approximately 25% of its perimeter. 2. Consistency with the Boundary Review Board Objectives: (from RCW 36.93.180) a. Preservation of natural neighborhoods and communities; The proposed annexation would cause no disruption to the larger community. Also, it is anticipated that additional annexations will occur in this area in the future. b. Use of physical boundaries, including but not limited to bodies of water, highways, and land contours; Unfortunately, these are not the best boundaries but it is anticipated that the Boundary Review Board may expand them during their review by including the area to the north and possibly to the west. C. Creation and preservation of logical service areas; Water and sewer service boundaries will not change. Neither will school district boundaries. Renton will take over fire and police service for the 13.69-acres upon annexation. Fire District No. 40 and the King County Sheriff's Department currently serve the area. Pursuant to state law, there will be no change in the garbage service provider for at least seven years. d. Prevention of abnormally irregular boundaries; The new city boundary resulting from this annexation would only be slightly more regular than the existing City boundary. A peninsula of City land now defines the area and the proposed annexation would enlarge rather than eliminate this peninsula, at least during the interim. Further annexations are anticipated in the near future in this area. e. Discouragement of multiple incorporations of small cities and encouragement of incorporations of cities in excess of ten thousand population in heavily populated urban areas; Not applicable. No incorporations are proposed in this area. f Dissolution of inactive special purpose districts; Not applicable. There are no inactive special purpose districts here. g. Adjustment of impractical boundaries; Proposed Hoquiam Annexation 10% Notice of Intent March 29, 2005 Page 5 This annexation is not being proposed to adjust what are considered impractical boundaries. The Boundary Review Board may wish to expand this boundary if the City decides to invoke its jurisdiction during their mandatory 45-day review period. h. Incorporation as cities or towns or annexation to cities or towns of unincorporated areas which are urban in character; King County has designated this area for urban development because of its location within the Urban Growth Boundary. The County has also indicated that it wants to divest itself from providing urban services to these unincorporated urban areas by turning them over to cities as quickly as possible. Because the subject site is west of 1161h Avenue SE, it is unlikely to be incorporated by Fairwood. As a result, because it is within Renton's PAA, annexation is appropriate at this time. i. Protection of agricultural and rural lands which are designated for long term productive agricultural and resource use by a comprehensive plan adopted by the county legislative authority. Not applicable. No portions of the proposed annexation area are rural or designated for long term productive agricultural use in the King County or Renton Comprehensive Plans. 3. A fiscal analysis for the proposed annexation is attached. This analysis indicates that the proposed annexation would initially cost the City approximately $34,545 a year. However, at full development with an estimated 171 units, the cost to the City would be $32,313 a year to serve the area, $2,232 less than it would spend if no additional units were built. The major reason for this is that the estimated 70 new multi -family units will be priced and assessed much lower than normally larger single-family detached units. The costs for service per capita however will remain the same, regardless of housing type. In addition, there is an estimated one-time pro -rated cost to the City of $77,452 for future park acquisition and development, based on the estimated 330 people who would ultimately live here. CONCLUSION: The proposed Hudson Annexation is essentially consistent with relevant County and City annexation policies, as well as most Boundary Review Board objectives for annexation. Reviewing staff has identified no major impediments to the provision of City services to the area; however, this annexation would be more costly to the City than most annexations of similar size. If the Council was to accept this 10% Notice of Intent petition and the proponents are successful in obtaining signatures representing 60% of the area's assessed value, the City might want to later on invoke the Boundary Review Board's jurisdiction in order to enlarge the annexation and make it more efficient. Attachments PARK TERRACE ANNEXATION - EXPANDED FISCAL ANALYSIS SHEET :Costs' Units Population AV Existing dev. 103 204 $7,482,400 Full dev. 173 330 $24,982,000 Assumptions: 2 persons / household $250,000 AV / new unit $74,083 AV /existing unit Existing Full Rate Regular levy $23,495 $78,443 3.14 1 Excesslevy $588 $1,964 0.07861 State shared revenues Rate (per cap) Existing Full Liquor tax $3.52 $718.08 $1,161.60 Liquor Board profits $7.43 $1,515.72 $2,451.90 Fuel tax - roads $14.46 $2,949.84 $4,771.80 Fuel tax - arterials $8.01 $1,634.04 $2,643.30 MVET $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Camper excise $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Criminal justice $0.22 $44.88 $72.60 Total $6,862.56 $11,101.20 Miscellaneous revenues Rate Existing Full Real estate excise* $48.57 $9,908.28 $16,028.10 Utility tax** $133.20 $13,719.60 $23,043.60 Fines & forfeits* $17.53 $3,576.12 $5,784.90 Total $27,204.00 $44,856.60 * Per capita ** Per housing unit - based on $2,220 annual utility billing @ 6% tax rate Per capita Existing Full Contracted Services Alcohol $0.19 $38.76 $62.70 Public Defender $4.68 $954.72 $1,544.40 Jail $8.56 $1,746.24 $2,824.80 Subtotal $2,739.72 $4,431.90 Court/legal/admin. $66.92 $13,651.68 $22,083.60 Parks maintenance* $14.90 $3,039.60 $4,917.00 Police $276.89 $56,485.56 $91,373.70 Road maintenance** N/A $7,425.00 $14,644 Fire*** $1.25 $9,353.00 $31,227.50 Total $92,694.56 $168,677.70 Total revenues Existing :'s$581J Full :$1$63fi512 Total ongoing costs Existing $16945f Full $16$ 77 7-6: .................... * See Sheet Parks FIA ** See Sheet Roads FIA *** Rate per $1,000 of assessed valuation (FD#25 contract) Net fiscal impact Existing s:::::$345A507 Full bitirrieost Parks acquisition & development (from Sheet Parks FIA): $108,368.00 Other one-time costs: New Traffic Signal Unknown .............. Total one-time costs:::::::::::*i141$3 t (3 Revised 8-29 per Finance Memo Proposed Hudson Annexation Figure 1: Vicinity Map ♦� \ Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning — — City Limits 1� Alen Pieuch, Admimsvarur - J c gel R�,.,�� C_ 1 Proposed Annex. Area L p T 3 Octirtx r 2005 0 600 1200 1 : 7200 roL_r' F � Eff-B`lO Ion M x L7: u r-j- u b6 Q 0 0 ❑ �Q ❑ a °El L o � l O D 13 D o C 0 � a��GOC wRnO WN I© r1. Proposed Hudson Annexation figure 3: Existing Structures Map Structure ®Econoniic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning — — — City Limits � G. D PiRo" Administrator Proposed Annex. Area G. Del Rosario <4N.r 30ctober2005 �0 n AB KT x, 12 nxe ,a ,AM , _ T.A „ X]Na x l>aO t x, _-- _ x _ aaa _ iNa ,y, ._ _ ____ as — x „,D „D., a x 1-1 k� vX 57 x ai V� uM >m K—xC*� _ x zn «n a� x�.» _ _ x x - - I x, - x xxl— a x " ` x I x I _ X'— 'iaT � x L, Gaya has» xsr. "un x,DM 'SDM " x iTa ,5,. x:„ <x„ .� a x \ 1( __ 'Sam\ ' x \ �\ ---J x x"aa x ...\ x AT ADM T —� _ x� l >.n x v �J » x \\ l M i A x x x x x x— 4. �X;X— X STn sue i V A ` v Proposed Hudson Annexation 0 300 600 ' Figure 4: Topography Map hmmmllmd 1m Interval Contours ®� Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning — — — City Limits 1 : 3600 G. Del RoPietuh, Administrator Proposed Annex. Area O. Dsario baN.�O 3 October ?Oo5 PARK TERRACE ANNEXATION - EXPANDED FISCAL ANALYSIS SHEET .................. .................. Revsri i�efi .................. .................. .Costs ..... . Units Population AV Existing dev. 103 204 $7,482,400 Full dev. 173 330 $24,982,000 Assumptions: 2 persons / household $250,000 AV / new unit $74,083 AV /existing unit Existing Full Rate Re ular le $23,495 $78,443 3.14 Excesslevy $588 $1,964 0.07861 State shared revenues Rate(per cap) Existing Full Liquor tax $3.52 $718.08 $1,161.60 Liquor Board profits $7.43 $1,515.72 $2,451.90 Fuel tax - roads $14.46 $2,949.84 $4,771.80 Fuel tax - arterials $8.01 $1,634.04 $2,643.30 MVET $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Camper excise $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Criminal justice $0.22 $44.88 $72.60 Total $6,862.56 $11,101.20 Miscellaneous revenues Rate Existing Full Real estate excise* $48.57 $9,908.28 $16,028.10 Utility tax** $133.20 $13,719.60 $23,043.60 Fines & forfeits* $17.53 $3,576.12 $5,784.90 Total $27,204.00 $44,856.60 * Per capita ** Per housing unit - based on $2,220 annual utility billing @ 6% tax rate Per capita Existing Full Contracted Services Alcohol $0.19 $38.76 $62.70 Public Defender $4.68 $954.72 $1,544.40 Jail $8.56 $1,746.24 $2,824.80 Subtotal $2,739.72 $4,431.90 Court/legal/admin. $66.92 $13,651.68 $22,083.60 Parks maintenance* $14.90 $3,039.60 $4,917.00 Police $276.89 $56,485.56 $91,373.70 Road maintenance** N/A $7,425.00 $14,644 Fire*** $1.25 $9,353.00 $31,227.50 Total I $92,694.56 $168,677.70 Total revenues Existing Full Total ongoing costs Existing ::$9�f94 Full $1i$RW70 * See Sheet Parks FIA ** See Sheet Roads FIA *** Rate per $1,000 of assessed valuation (FD#25 contract) Net fiscal impact Existin g5d5` Full ss33258 :pi � time Wets>: Parks acquisition & development (from Sheet Parks FIA): $108,368.00 Other one-time costs: New Traffic Signal Unknown .................... Total one-time costs:fia41$3�IR Revised 8-29 per Finance Memo n King County Department of Assessments King County Administration Bldg. 500 Fourth Avenue, Room 708 Seattle, WA 98104-2384 (206) 296-5195 FAX (206) 296-0595 Email: assessor.info@metroke.gov www.metroke.gov/assessor/ Scott Noble Assessor ANNEXATION PETITION CERTIFICATION THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the petition submitted September 23, 2005 to the King County Department of Assessments by Don Erickson, Senior Planner for the City of Renton, supporting the annexation to Renton of the properties described as the Hudson Annexation, has been examined, the property taxpayers, tax parcel numbers, and assessed value of properties listed thereon carefully compared with the King County tax roll records, and as a result of such examination, found to be sufficient under the provisions of the New Section of Revised Code of Washington, Section 35.13.002. The Department of Assessments has not verified that the signature on the petition is valid through comparison with any record of actual signatures, nor that the signature was obtained or submitted in an appropriate time frame, and this document does not certify such to be the case. Dated this 29th day of September, 2005 Scott Noble, King County Assessor a-os-oo5- NOTICE OF INTENTION TO COMMENCE CITY OF RENTON ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS UNDER RCW 35A.14.120 SEP 2 0 2005 (Direct Petition Method) RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE 0 0 % PETITION HUDSONANNEXATION) TO: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON City Hall, c/o City Clerk 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 The undersigned are the owners of properties representing not less than ten percent (10%) of the assessed value of all property within the proposed annexation area which they desire to annex to the City of Renton. We hereby advise the City Council of the City of Renton that it is our desire to commence annexation proceedings under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120, of all or any part of the area described below. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to the City of Renton. A map (Exhibit 1) and legal description (Exhibit 2) are included as part of this petition. The City Council is requested to set a date not later than sixty days after the filing of this request for a public meeting with the undersigned. 1. At such meeting, the City Council will decide whether the City will accept, reject or geographically modify the proposed annexation; 2. The City Council will decide whether to require simultaneous adoption of a proposed zoning regulation; and, 3. The City Council will decide whether to require the assumption of a proportional share of existing city indebtedness by the area to be annexed. This page is the first of a group of pages containing identical text material. It is intended by the signers that such multiple pages of the Notice of Intention be presented and considered as one Notice of Intention. It may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures which cumulatively may be considered as a single Notice of Intention. Peck Annexation Petition Page 1 of 2 Hudson Annexation WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition. (Names of petitioners should be in identical form as the name that appears on record in the title to the real estate.) M� Lot Legal Property ; ae" Stgrt .te �rd�� A��f(�h.;6r u - 3 N�SalgA dress ��s- a I�1b Assessed Value a U43-;e��e+A gnedJ�bfwner 'V W 1.1,(+L �1 / 35 e �a ofProperty r $z Despttoti AnneAt p RX ;..ri^''H�4, 1. e7l3 2 - 604504 12(—�,^W4 006rf000337 �45 000 -- ,0. 7Wis QoggOoN,3� -,5is 1;2o0 �l' �� ' St � IOC 2. w A `-A�b � Q000-00a33 I 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Page 2 of 2 H:\DIVISION.S\P&TS\PLANNING\ANNEX\10% Notice of Intent (reVs).doc\DE 09/01 /05 VARO 90 a FYA_�iCMA, -. VI �5xwlelr g 008700 0315 20 4 AKERS FARMS # 5 E 100 FT LESS N 18 FT & S 10 FT THOF 008700 0316 20 4 AKERS FARMS # 5 W 100 FT 008700 0317 20 4 AKERS FARMS # 5 E 200 FT LESS E 100 FT EXC N 18 FT & S 10 FT THOF 008700 0320 214 AKERS FARMS # 5 LESS N 60 FT & LESS W 100 FT 008700 0321 214 AKERS FARMS # 5 N 60 FT LESS W 100 FT LESS CORD 008700 0322 214 AKERS FARMS # 5 W 100 FT 008700 0325 22 4 AKERS FARMS # 5 LOT l OF KC SHORT PLAT NO 585025 RECORDING NO 8603310570 SD SHORT 008700 0327 22 4 AKERS FARMS #5 LOT 2 OF KC SHORT PLAT NO 585025 RECORDING NO 8603310570 SD SHORT 008700 0330 23 4 AKERS FARMS # 5 LOT 2 KING COUNTY SP #279037 REC #7910160908 SD SP DAF 008700 0332 24 4 AKERS FARMS # 5 LOT 24 LESS S 145 FT LESS W 8 FT 008700 0333 23 4 AKERS FARMS #5 LOT I KING COUNTY SP #279037 REC #7910160968 SD SP DAF 008700 0335 24-25 4 AKERS FARMS # 5 S 145 FT LESS CO RD 008700 0337 24-25 4 AKERS FARMS # 5 W 8 OF LOT 24 LESS S 145 FT TGW LOT 25 LESS S 145 FT 292305 9037 292305 37 E 264 FT OF N'/. OF SE '/, LESS N 30 FT TAX POR PAR EX UND RCW 84.36.381 THRU .389 292305 19 PP ACT 37105046 MOBILE HOME POR N %4 OF NW '/4 OF SE'/, BAAP ON E LN JOHN F BENSON ROAD 292305 9066 292305 66 BEG AT INTSN OF LN OF NW%OF SE%4&ELNOF BENSON RD TH E ALG SD N LN 80 FT TH S 180 FT TH 292305 9071 292305 71 W 75 FT OF E 150 FT OF W 300 FT OF E POR OF NW %4 OF SE '/4 OF FOLG - BEG INTSN 292305 9137 292305 137 E 75 FT OF W 580.8 FT OF S 150 FT OF N 180 FT OF NW'/4OF SE !/4 292305 9047 292305 47 E 60 FT OF W 640.8 FT OF N '/4 OF NW '/4 OF SE '/4 LESS N30FT 292305 9058 292305 58 E 90 FT OF W 730.8 FT OF N '/4 OF NW '/4 OF SE '/4 LESS CO RD 292305 9059 292305 59 E 120 FT OF W 850.8 FTOFN'/4OFNW'/4OFSE %4 LESS CO RD 292305 9060 292305 60 E 120 FT OF W 970.8 FT OFN'/4OFNW'/,OFSE'/4 LESS CO RD 292305 9057 292305 57 N '/, OF NW '/4 OF SE '/, LESS E 264 FT & LESS W 970.8 FT LESS CO RD 292305 9082 292305 82 BEG AT INTSN OF N LNOFNW'/,OFSE%,&ELNOF BENSON RD TH E ALG SD N LN 80 FT TO TPOB TH 292305 9064 292305 64 E 100.8 FT OF W 280.8 FT OF S 150 FT OF N 180 FT OF NW '/, OF SE '/4 292305 9070 292305 70 N 180 FT OF E 75 FT OF W 325.8 FT OF POR OF NW '/4 OF SE/4 LY E OF BENSON RD LESS N 30 FT 292305 9065 292305 65 E 75 FT OF W 400.8 FT OF S 150 FT OF N 180 FT OF POR OFNW'/4OFSE%4LYEOF BENSON RD CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board. . Staff Contact...... Subject: Finance & IS Department Michael E. Bailey, Administrator, x6858 2006 Preliminary and Final Budget Exhibits: For Agenda of: 10/24/2005 Agenda Status Consent .............. Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Ordinance ............. Resolution........... . Old Business........ New Business....... Study Sessions...... Information........ . X X Recommended Action: Approvals: • Refer to Committee of the Whole Legal Dept......... • Set Public Hearing on 2006 Revenue Sources and Finance Dept...... X Preliminary Budget for November 14, 2005 Other ............... • Set final Public Hearing on proposed 2006 Budget for November 28, 2005 Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: In compliance with RCW 35.33.051, the proposed 2006 Preliminary Budget will be submitted to the Mayor, City Council, and City Clerk by November 1, 2005. This agenda bill sets the time and place for two public hearings, November 14 and November 28, 2005. The following Ordinances will be presented in November as part of the 2006 Budget public hearing process: 1. 2006 Budget 2. 2006 Property Tax STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Set public hearing dates of November 14 and 28, 2005, to consider the 2006 Budget, and subsequently adopt the ordinances necessary to finalize the 2006 Budget. C:\Documents and Settings\mpetersen\Local Settings\Temp\2006 Preliminary Budget Hearings_.doc CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Al #: Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. Transportation Systems October 24, 2005 Agenda Status Staff Contact...... Bill Wressell, ext. 7400 Consent .............. X Public Hearing.. Subject: 2005 Overlay Correspondence.. Contractor: Western Asphalt, Inc. Ordinance ............. Resolution........... . Old Business........ New Business....... Exhibits: Final Pay Estimate Study Sessions...... Notice of Completion Information......... Recommended Action: Approvals' Legal Dept......... Council Concur Finance Dept...... Other. .. . Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Amount Budgeted....... Overlay Art. Rehab Cnrf Water Total Total Project $169,903.49 Final Pay Est $8,942.29 Retainage $ 705,000.00 $ 195,000.00 $ 106,838.80 $1,006,838.80 $1,006,838.80 SUMMARY OF ACTION: Transfer/Amendment. N/A Revenue Generated -0- Share Tot. j ect 100% The project started on July 26, 2005, and was completed on October 14, 2005. The original contract amount was $875,181.04 and the final contract amount is $849,120.44. Near the end of the construction phase of the contract, it was determined there was going to be cost savings from decreased patching and paving quantities. It was decided to add a street from the 2006 overlay list. N. 33rd Street, from Burnett Avenue N. to Park Avenue N. was chosen. The contractor, Western Asphalt, asked for additional mobilization, traffic control, and finish and cleanup for the extra work. Change Order (C O) 1 added these additional items. Of the $849,120.44 final contract amount, the Street Overlay Program will have paid $547,281.64, the Arterial Rehabilitation Program will have paid $195,000.00, and Utilities Systems Division will have paid $106,838.80. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Council accept completion of the project, payment of the Final Pay Estimate in the amount of $169,903.49, and release retainage for the full project in the total amount of $42,456.02 after sixty (60) days, subject to the required authorization. Document 1 admin/Agenda2005/Final Pay Estimate for Overlay TO: FINANCE DIRECTOR FROM: TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIRECTOR CONTRACTOR: Western Asphalt, Inc. CONTRACT NO. CAG 05-73 ESTIMATE NO. 2 FINAL PROJECT: 2005 OVERLAY 1. CONTRACTOR EARNINGS THIS ESTIMATE 2. SALES TAX @ 8.80% 3. TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT THIS ESTIMATE 4. EARNINGS PREVIOUSLY PAID CONTRACTOR 5. * EARNINGS DUE CONTRACTOR THIS ESTIMATE 6. SUBTOTAL - CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 7. RETAINAGE ON PREVIOUS EARNINGS 8. ** RETAINAGE ON EARNINGS THIS ESTIMATE 9. SUBTOTAL - RETAINAGE 10. SALES TAX PREVIOUSLY PAID 11. SALES TAX DUE THIS ESTIMATE 12. SUBTOTAL - SALES TAX * (95%xLINE1) ** (RETAINAGE: 5916) FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTION: PAYMENT TO CONTRACTOR (Lines 5 and 11): Transportation -Street Overlay ACCOUNT 317.012108.016.5950.0030.67.000000[25207]5354 Transportation -Arterial Rehabilitation ACCOUNT 317.012186.k016.5950.0030.67.000000[25437]5354 Surfacewater Engineering -SW 7th Street Drainage Improvement Project Phase II ACCOUNT 316.000000.020.5940.0076.63.020039 RETAINED AMOUNT (Line 8): Transportation -Street Overlay ACCOUNT 317.012108.016.5950.0030.67.000000[25207]5354 Transportation -Arterial Rehabilitation ACCOUNT 317.012186.016.5950.0030.67.000000[25437]5354 Surfacewater Engineering -SW 7th Street Drainage Improvement Project Phase II ACCOUNT 316.000000.020.5940.0076.63.020039 $178, 845.78 $0.00 $636,760.93 $169, 903.49 $33,513.73 $8,942.29 $0.00 $0.00 GRAND TOTAL: $104,506.63 #2 $0.00 #2 $65,396.86 #2 $5,500.35 #2 $0.00 #2 $3,441.94 #2 TOTAL THIS ESTIMATE: CHARTER 116, LAWS OF 1965 CITY OF RENTON CERTIFICATION I, THE UNDERSIGNED DO HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, THAT THE MATERIALS HAVE BEEN FURNISHED, THE SERVICES RENDERED OR THE LABOR PERFORMED AS DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND THAT THE CLAIM IS A JUST, DUE AN AID OBLIGATION AGAINST THE CITY OF RENTON, THA I AM AUTHORIZED TO AUTHENTICATE AND CERTI TO SAI CLAIM / SIGNED: $178,845.78 $806,664.42 1 $42,456.02 $0.00 $849,120.44 $169,903.49 $8, 942.29 $178,845.78 ro Rp� Project: 2005 OVERLAY Contra riot Weciom A -halt Inn Contract Number: CAG 05-073 Closing Date: 10/14/2005 Item Dscriphon Unit Est. Unit No. Quantity Price 4 1 1 revtous Previous This This Total Total Quantity Amount Quantity Amount Quantity Amount 001. Mobilization LS 1.0 $ 67,491.20 0.25 0.75 $50,618.40 0.25 $16,872.80 1.00 $67,491.20 002. Removal of Asphalt Concrete SY 2136.0 $ 5.60 1,235.33 2839.00 $15,898.40 1235.33 $6,917.85 4074.33 $22,816.25 Pavement (by Cold Planing) 003. Crushed Surfacing Top Course Ton 30.0 $ 33.60 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 004. Asphalt Concrete Paving (Al" Patch) SF 100000.0 $ 2.30 2,536.00 256.50 82352.00 $189,409.60 2792.50 $6,422.75 85144.50 $195,832.35 Class "B" Including Asphalt 005. Asphalt Concrete Paving(Overlay) Ton 8706.0 $ 44.80 536.98 332.33 7471.97 $334,744.26 869.31 $38,945.09 8341.28 $373,689.35 Class "B" Including Asphalt 006. Plastic Crosswalk LF 1460.0 $ 1.12 880.00 340.00 512.00 0.00 $0.00 1732.00 $1,939.84 1732.00 $1.939.84 (8 Wide) 007. Plastic Stop Bar (18" Wide) LF 181.0 $ 3.92 28.00 22.00 67.00 109.50 27.00 0.00 $0.00 253.50 $993.72 253.50 $993.72 008. Plastic Arrow Each 39.0 $ 41.44 43.00 0.00 $0.00 43.00 $1,781.92 43.00 $1,781.92 009. 4" Raised Pavement Marker Each 2846.0 $ 1.45 1,198.00 1,259.00 113.00 0.00 $0.00 2570.00 $3,726.50 2570.00 $3,726.50 Type 1, Yellow 010. 4" Raised Pavement Marker Each 1858.0 $ 1.45 650.00 1,190.00 75.00 0.00 $0.00 1915.00 $2,776.75 1915.00 $2,776.75 Type 1, White 011. 4" Raised Pavement Marker Each 35.0 $ 11.20 6.00 39.00 4.00 0.00 $0.00 49.00 $548.80 49.00 $548.80 Type 2, Blue 012. 4" Raised Pavement Marker Each 314.0 $ 3.36 130.00 272.00 16.00 0.00 $0.00 418.00 $1,404 48 418.00 $1 404.48 Type 2d, Yellow 013. 4" Raised Pavement Marker Each 262.0 $ 3.36 93.00 160.00 10.00 0.00 $0.00 263.00 $883.68 263.00 $883.68 Type 2e, White 014, Traffic Control LS 1.0 $ 77,112.00 0.50 0.50 $38,556.00 0.50 $38,556.00 1.00 $77,112.00 015. Adjust Monument Each 72.0 $ 196.00 7.00 1.00 4.00 4.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 5.00 46.00 $9,016.00 27.00 $5,292.00 73.00 $14,308.00 016, Adjust Manhole Each 129.00 $ 291.20 9.00 2,00 8.00 12.00 9.00 6.00 5.00 7.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 1.00 3.00 -4.00 58.00 $16,889.60 70.00 $20,384.00 128.00 $37,273.60 017. Adjust Catch Basin Each 13.0 $ 291.20 2.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 $582.40 12.00 $3,494.40 14.00 54,076.80 494$: daljeetYehe9e,.-- '- Each 90.0 $ 291.20 3.00 8.00 3.00 9.00 7.00 5.00 4.00 1.00 4.00 9.00 7.00 2.00 -1.00 50.00 $14,560.00 61.00 $17,763.20 111.00 $32,323.20 019. Finish and Clean Up LS 1.0 $ 2,800.00 1.00 0.00 $0.00 1.00 $2,800.00 1.00 $2,800.00 020. Additional Mobilization LS 1.0 S 2,800.00 1.00 0.00 $0.00 1.00 $2.800.00 1.00 $2,800.00 (Change Order # 1) 021. Additional Traffic Control LS 1.0 $ 3,892.00 1,00 0.00 $0.00 1.00 $3,892.00 1.00 $3,892.00 (Change Order # 1) 022. Additional Finish and Cleanup LS 1.0 $ 650.00 1.00 0.00 $0.00 1.00 $650.00 1.00 $650.00 (Change Order # 1 I f670,274.66 Total S178,845.78 3849,120.44 1011Y1 1 1 .. w'. sTATg O� State of Washington o4 Department of Revenue 9 x Audit Procedures & Administration 1P _ y°$ PO Box 47474 e� 7eB9 a� Olympia, Washington 98504-7474 Reg. No.: Date: October 14, 2005 NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT From: DEPARTMENT USE ONLY City of Renton Assigned To 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055-2132 Date Assigned Notice is hereby given relative to the completion of contract or project described below. Description of Contract 2005 Overlay CAG-05-073 Contractor's Name Western Asphalt, Inc. Telephone No. (206) 624-4433 Contractor's Address P.O. Box 980 Maple Valley, WA 98038 Date Work Commenced Date Work Completed Date Work Accepted July 26, 2005 October 14, 2005 October 14, 2005 Surety or Bonding Co. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America Agent's Address Holly Ulfers 1001 4th Ave. Suite 1800 Seattle, Wa. 98154 Contract Amount: Additions or Reductions: Sales Tax: Total $875,181.04 Amount Disbursed: $806,664.42 Amount Retained: $ 42,456.02 $875,181.04 By Phone No: Total: $849,120.44 (Disbursing Officer) The Disbursing Officer must complete and mail THREE copies of this notice to the Department of Revenue, Olympia, Washington 98504-7474, immediately after acceptance of the work done under this contract. NO PAYMENTS SHALL BE MADE FROM RETAINED FUND until receipt of Department's certificate, and then only in accordance with said certificate. FORM REV 31 0020 (12-92) H:forms/notcomplt/ CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI #: Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of- Dept/Div/Board.. Utility Systems Division/ Surface October 24, 2005 Water Utility Agenda Status Staff Contact...... Ron Straka (ext. 7248) Daniel Carey (ext. 7293) Consent .............. X Public Hearing.. Subject: Final Pay Estimate — CAG-05-033, Correspondence.. SWP-27-3225, Hoquiam Place NE/SR 900 Ordinance ............. Storm System Project Resolution............ Old Business........ New Business....... Exhibits: Pay Estimate #5 Final Study Sessions...... Notice of Completion Information......... Recommended Action: Approvals: Council Concur Legal Dept......... Finance Dept...... X Other. Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... $380.80 Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... $35,000.00 Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget $350,000.00 City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The contractor for the Hoquiam Place NE/SR 900 Storm System Project was Young Life Construction. Construction started on May 31, 2005, and all work was completed by October 5, 2005. The original contract amount was $25,164.35 and the final contract amount is $25,526.86. The difference of $362.51 was due to minor differences in bid item quantities. The project is funded from the Surface Water Utility Small Drainage Projects Program, account number 421.000600.018.5960.0038.65.065015. The approved 2005 Capital Improvement Program budget is $350,000 (including $180,000 for 2005 CIP and $170,000 in the carry forward). Of that amount, approximately $159,000 was available for this project, and other projects. The 2005 Surface Water Utility Capital Improvement Program 421 account has sufficient budget remaining to fund the final pay estimate. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Accept the Hoquiam Place NE/SR 900 Storm System Project, approve the Final Pay Estimate, and release the retainage of $1,173.11 after sixty days and after all the required releases from the State have been obtained. HAFile Sys\SWP -Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 -Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-3225 Hoquiam PL NE\1000-1 a Final Payment\051007-AgendaBill- Final.doc\DWCtp TO: FINANCE DIRECTOR FROM: PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATOR CONTRACTOR: Young Life Constr. ]TRACT NO. CAG 05-033 ESTIMATE NO. 5 Final PROJECT: Hoquiam PL NE / SR-900 Storm System Project 1. CONTRACTOR EARNINGS THIS ESTIMATE $350.00 2. SALES TAX @ 8.80% $30.80 3. TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT THIS ESTIMATE $380.80 4. EARNINGS PREVIOUSLY PAID CONTRACTOR $21,956.58 5. * EARNINGS DUE CONTRACTOR THIS ESTIMATE $332.50 6. SUBTOTAL - CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 7. RETAINAGE ON PREVIOUS EARNINGS 8. ** RETAINAGE ON EARNINGS THIS ESTIMATE 9. SUBTOTAL - RETAINAGE 10. SALES TAX PREVIOUSLY PAID 11. SALES TAX DUE THIS ESTIMATE 12. SUBTOTAL - SALES TAX * (95% x LINE 1) ** (RETAINAGE: 5%) $1,155.61 $17.50 $22,289.08 $1,173.11 $2,033.87 $30.80 $2,064,67 GRAND TOTAL: $25,526.86 FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTION: PAYMENT TO CONTRACTOR (Lines 5 and 11): ACCOUNT # 421.000600.018.5960.0038.65.065015 (65015/5354) $363.30 # 5 Final r«TAINED AMOUNT (Line 8): ACCOUNT # 421.000600.018.5960.0038.65.065015 (65015/5354) $17.50 # 5 Final CHARTER 116, LAWS OF 1965 CITY OF RENTON CERTIFICATION I, THE UNDERSIGNED DO HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, THAT THE MATERIALS HAVE BEEN FURNISHED, THE SERVICES RENDERED OR THE LABOR PERFORMED AS DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND THAT THE CLAIM IS A JUST, DUE AND UNPAID OBLIGATION AGAINST THE CITY OF RENTON, AND THAT I AM AUTHORIZED TO AUTHENTICATE AND CERTIFY/r0 SAID CLAIM w Signed: TOTAL THIS ESTIMATE: $363.30 $17.50 $380.80 ',�/ 1 G140,�- Printed On: 10/06/2005 City of Renton Public Works Department Page 1 Printed On: 10/06/2005 City of Renton Public Works Department Page 1 Project: Hoquiam PL NE / SR-900 Storm System Project -actor: Young Life Constr. em Description No. 001. Mobilization 002, Construction Survey, Staking, and As -Built 003. Traffic Control 004. Erosion Control 005. Trench Excavation Safety Systems 006. Driveway Excavation and Grading 007. Crushed Surfacing 008. Asphalt Conc. Pavement Class B 009. 8-inch Dia. Ductile Iron Storm Pipe 010. 8"x 6" DI Cross and PVC Pipe Installation 011. 12-inch Dia. CPEP Storm Pipe 012. Import Trench Backfill 13. Quarry Spalls 014. Catch Basin Type 1 015. Catch Basin Type 11, 48-inch 016. Remove Rock Wall 017. Construct Rock Wall 018. Gravel Backfill For Drains 019. Sawcutting 020. Remove, Replace Conc. Sidewalk 021. Remove, Replace Conc Curb and Gutter 022. Remove 8 Restore Wooden Fence 023. Restoration, Topsoil, Seeding 024. Minor Changes Subtotal 8.8% Sales Tax FT Total Pay Estimate 5 Final Unit Est. Unit Quantity Price Lump Sum 1 $3,500.00 Lump Sum 1 $1,500.00 Lump Sum 1 $1,500.00 Lump Sum 1 $500.00 Lump Sum 1 $2,000.00 Square Feet 2000 $1.00 Ton 50 $22.00 Ton 26 $65.00 Linear Feet 11 $30.00 Lump Sum 1 $400.00 Linear Feet 45 $15.00 Ton 30 $15.00 Ton 16 $15.00 Each 1 $600.00 Each 1 $2,500.00 Lump Sum 1 $750.00 Ton 24 $40.00 Ton 6 $20.00 Linear Feet 46 $4.00 Square Yard 6 $65.00 Linear Feet 10 $30.00 Linear Feet 20 $7.00 Lump Sum 1 $800.00 Lump Sum 1 $500.00 Contract Number CAG 05-033 Closing Date: 10/07/05 Previous Previous This Quantity Amount Quantity 0.90 $3,1%00 0.10 1.00 $1,500.00 1.00 $1,500.00 1.00 $500.00 1.00 $2,000.00 2920 $2,920.00 65.40 $1,438.80 26.30 $1,709.50 20.25 $607.50 0.85 $340,94 45.0 $675.00 33.56 $503.40 15.27 $229.05 1.0 $600.00 1.0 $2,500.00 1.0 $750.00 12.8 $512.00 $0, 00 21.0 $84.00 9.6 $624.00 $0.00 24.0 $168.00 1.00 $800.00 $0.00 $23,112.19 $2,033.87 $25,146.06 This Total Total Amount Quantity Amount $350.00 1.00 $3,500.00 $0.00 1.00 $1,500.00 $0.00 1.00 $1,500.00 $0.00 1.00 $500.00 $0 00 1.00 $2,000.00 $0.00 2920.00 $2,920.00 $0.00 65.40 $1,438.80 $0.00 26.30 $1,709.50 $0.00 20.25 $607.50 $0.00 0.85 $340.94 $0.00 45.00 $675.00 $0.00 33.56 $503.40 $0.00 15,27 $229.05 $0.00 1.00 $600.00 $0.00 1.00 $2,500.00 $0.00 1.00 $750.00 $0.00 12.80 $512.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 21.00 $64.00 $0.00 9.60 $624.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 24.00 $168.00 $0.00 1.00 $800.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 $350.00 $23,462.19 $30.80 $2,064.67 $380.80 $25,526.86 jw /d . 6 - o .S /q/6/a6' STATE O� State of Washington Reg.No.: o4 Department of Revenue Q x Audit Procedures & Administration Date: w i PO Box 47474 Olympia, Washington 98504-7474 NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT From: DEPARTMENT USE ONLY City of Renton Assigned To Tracy Schuld 1055 South Grady Way Date Assigned Renton, WA 98055 Notice is hereby given relative to the completion of contract or project described below. Description of Contract CAG-05-033 - Hoquiam PL NE / SR 900 Storm System Project Contractor's Name Young Life Construction Telephone No. 253-862-5607 Attn: Nicole DeMoss Cell: 206-484-1107 Contractor's Address 10121 221 st Ave. E Bonney Lake, WA 98390 Date Work Commenced Date Work Completed Date Work Accepted May 31, 2005 October 5, 2005 October 24, 2005 Surety or Bonding Co. Western Surety Company Agent's Address Alan Burton, Great Northern Insurance Services 2701 East Main Ave, Puyallup, WA Phone: 253-848-9900 Contract Amount: $23,129.00 Additions or Reductions: $333.19 Sales Tax: $2,064.67 Total $25,526.86 ME Phone No: Amount Disbursed: $24,353.75 Amount Retained: $1,173.11 Total: $25,526.86 (Disbursing Officer) The Disbursing Officer must complete and mail THREE copies of this notice to the Department of Revenue, Olympia, Washington 98504- 7474, immediately after acceptance of the work done under this contract. NO PAYMENTS SHALL BE MADE FROM RETAINED FUND until receipt of Department's certificate, and then only in accordance with said certificate. FORM REV 31 0020 (12-92) DC:CTY31 0020 11/99 bh CfI�Y O1� F:E:NIt)N C'Ol1N(_'ll. AGI;NDA BILL Submitting Data Dept'Div/Board Staff Contact-... Planning/Building/Public Works Utility Systems Division/Water Utility Abdoul Gak)ur (ext. 7210) Subject: Reimbursement to Developer off leritiage Glen Plat for Replacement of Water Line in NI; 20`I' Street Exhibits: Issue Paper Request better from Developer For Agenda of: October 24, 2005 Agenda Status Consent .............. Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Ordinance ............. Resolution ............ Old Business........ New Business....... Study Sessions...... Information......... R. Recommended Action: Approvals: Council Concur Legal Dept......... Finance Dept...... X Other ............... Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required Amount Budgeted Total Project Budget N/A $34,619.25 $35,000.00 $3 5,000.00 Acct# 421.00500-018-5960.0034.65.55t00 & 55170 I'ransfer/Amendment Revenue Generated City Share Total Project $34,619.25 SUMMARY OF ACTION: Cam West Development Inc., the developer of I leritage Glen Plat, is requesting a reimbursement Irom the City in the arnount of $34,619.25, for additional costs associated with the replacement of a water line in NE 20th Street. The City requested that the developer replace a 525-foot section of water line in NE 20th Street, instead of installing a less expensive interior water main to serve the plat. City code allows for reimbursement when the City requests a water line route that is more expensive than the minimum required to serve the subdivision. The Water Utility has budgeted sufficient funds in the 2005 Capital improvements Program budget (account no.'s 421.00500.018.5960.0034.65.055100 and 421.00500.018. 5960.0034.65.055170) to pay for this work. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve reimbursement, in the amount of $34,619.25, to Cam West Development Inc., for costs associated with the replacement of the water line in NE 20th Street. 11 \rile Svs\W rR - Drinking Water utility\WTR-03 - Correspondence\heritage-glen-revised-agcnda- bill -docAMitp `S-Y O� PLANNINGBUILDING/ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT T�o� MEMORANDUM DATE: October 14, 2005 TO: Terri Briere, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: .jC� Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor FROM: Gregg ZimmermaiVministrator STAFF CONTACT: Abdoul Gafour, Water Utility Supervisor (ext. 7210) SUBJECT: Reimbursement to Developer of Heritage Glen Plat for Replacement of Water Line in NE 20 Street ISSUE: Shall the City reimburse Cam West Development Inc., the developer of Heritage Glen Plat, for additional costs associated with the replacement of a water line in NE 20th Street? RECOMMENDATION: Approve the reimbursement, in the amount of $34,619.25, to Cam West Development Inc., for additional costs associated with the replacement of the water line in NE 201h Street. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: Cam West Development, Inc., is the developer of the Heritage Glen Plat, a 37-lot subdivision, located in the vicinity of NE 201h Street and Aberdeen Avenue NE. During the review of the engineering plans for utilities improvements for the plat, the City requested the developer to replace a 525-foot section of an old water line prior to the street improvements instead of installing a less expensive interior main to serve the plat. The replacement of the water line in NE 20th Street will better serve and benefit the City's overall water system grid and reduce the City's cost to maintain, repair and replace the old water line in the future. The developer could have provided water service to the plat and would have met City code by installing the less expensive interior water line. City code allows for the reimbursement of additional cost to the developer if the City's selected route for the water line is more expensive than other potential routes. The estimated cost to install about 577 feet of interior water line is $30,147.00 and the cost to replace the 525-foot section of water line in NE 20th Street is $64,766.25. The Council/Heritage Glen Reimbursement October 14, 2005 Page 2 of 2 difference in cost of $34,619.25 is mainly due to the removal and replacement of asphalt in NE 201h Street with an additional water main connection with an estimated cost of $18,573.25 and the installation of a half -street asphalt overlay to meet City's trench restoration standards with an estimated cost of $16,046.00. The Water Utility has reviewed the cost breakdown between the two routes of the water line and determined that the submitted final cost difference of $34,619.25 is acceptable based on similar projects. The Water Utility has budgeted sufficient funds in the 2005 Capital Improvements Program budget (account no. 421.00500.018.5960.0034.65.055100 and 421.00500.018.5960.0034.65.055170) to pay for this work. CONCLUSION: Cam West Development, Inc. has completed the replacement of the water line in NE 201h Street as requested by the City. The Water Utility has reviewed the additional cost requested by the developer and found it to be within the acceptable range for the work performed. Staff recommends that Council authorize the reimbursement, in the amount of $34,619.25, to Cam West Development, Inc. cc: Lys Hornsby, Utility Systems Director H:Tile Sys\WTR - Drinking Water Utility\WTR-03 - Correspondence\heritage-glen- rev ised-issue-paper.docWGtp June 10, 2004 Abdoul Gafour Renton City Hall 1055 South Grady'Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: Heritage Glen Plat Waterline Reimbursement Proposal Dear Abdoul, This letter is in regards to our discussions of extending an 8" waterline from the entrance of the Heritage Glen plat easterly within NE 20`h Street to connect to Aberdeen Avenue. This waterline extension will span approximately 523 feet. Currently, there is an existing 6" cast iron waterline within NE 20`h Street that spans from Aberdeen Avenue west to Jones Avenue. The Heritage Glen development proposal would normally be required to install. a water line within the interior roads and through an easement to establish a second connection at Aberdeen Avenue. During plat. engineering review, CamWest was approached by the city to revise the waterline proposal and to extend it out through NE 20th Street to Aberdeen Avenue. This location will better serve the overall water system grid and will also replace a 520-foot section of old cast iron water line within NE 20`h Street; thus reducing the City's cost for repair and maintenance. A cost estimate details both proposals has been completed by CamWest's contractor to arrive at a difference of approximately $17,000. This proposal is enclosed. The additional cost associated with the city proposal is mainly due to more removal and replacement of asphalt roadway, traffic control and additional connections to existing water lines. Should you have any questions or need any additional information related to this proposal please call me at (425) 825-1955. Thank you for your cooperation with this 'proposal and work towards a mutually agreeable solution,' Sincerely, S Slatten CamWest Development, Inc. cc: Jan Illian, Engineering Review enclosure. HERITAGE GLEN Cost to replace existing 6" water line with new 8" line at NE 20th Street outside of project frontage Date: 619/04 "` Assumptions: Prepared by: Universal Land All oil based products are subject to pricing change Option 1A: Crushed rock backfill quantity is approximate New 8" water line on NE 20th St from plat entrance to Aberdeen Ave Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Subtotal Tax Total 8" Ductile Iron Water Line 523 LF 28.5 $ 14,906 $ 1,327 $ 16,232 Sawcut 1066 LF 2.05 $ 2,185 $ 194 $ 2,380 Asphal Removal 1 LS 1840 $ 1,840 $ 164 $ 2,004 Crushed Rock Backfill 100 tons 16.25 $ 1,625 $ 145 $ 1,770 Temporary Asphalt Patch 1 LS 4100 $ 4,100 $ 365 $ 4,465 Permanent Patch 1 LS 7350 $ 7,350 $ 654 $ 8,004 Traffic Control 1 LS 1200 $ 1,200 $ 107 $ 1,307 Aberdeen Tie-in Prep. 1 LS 1805 $ 1,805 $ 161 $ 1,966 Monterey Tie-in Prep. 1 LS 1500 $ 1,500 $ 134 $ 1,634 Gate Valves @ Plat 1 LS 2140 $ 2,140 $ 190 $ 2,330 2" Blowoff 2 EA 210 $ 420 $ 37 $ 457 Abandon existing 6" line 1 LS 1100 $ 1,100 $ 98 $ 1,198 Export Unsuitable 100 CY 9.5 $ 950 $ 85 $ 1,035 Total $ 41,121 $ 3,660 $ 44,781 VFJUVII 10: New 8" Water Line thru Lots 19/20 & Easement to Aberdeen Ave. Item Quantity . Unit Unit Cost Subtotal Tax Total 8" DI Water Line to Aberdeen 577 LF $ 28.50 $ 16,445 $ 1,464 $ 17,908 Connection Prep @ Aberdeen 1 LS $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 178 $ 2,178 Gravel Repair to Existing Ease. 1 LS $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 89 $ 1,089 Misc. Fittings 1 LS $ 2,500 $ 2,500 $ 223 $ 2,723 Road Repair To Aberdeen 1 LS $ 3,500 $ 3,500 $ 312 $ 3,812 Total $ 25,445 $ 2,265 $ 27,709 S (easement) & Option 2 (NE 20th extention to Aberdeen) $ 17,071 City of Renton Cost":.,$ 17,071' March 1 2005 ' CUTILITY S STEMS Abdoul Gafour Renton City Hall 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: Heritage Glen Plat — Westchester Grind & Overlay Reimbursement Proposal Dear Abdoul, This letter is in regards to recent discussions between Jan Illian and Aaron Hollingbery, CamWest, about the required grind & overlay associated with the Heritage Glen plat. As you are.aware the city previously agreed to reimburse CamWest for the waterline extension work outside the Heritage Glen frontage as extended east to Aberdeen Avenue. Recently, it was brought to our attention that a half street grind & overlay is required along NE 20`h Street where the new waterline is installed within NE 20`h Street. A cost estimate is enclosed from Universal Land, CamWest's contractor, in the amount of $16,046. This estimate is for the portion of grind and overlay work within NE 20`h Street CamWest is seeking for reimbursement from the City. Should you have any questions or need any additional information related to this proposal please call me at (425) 825-1955. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Sara Slatten CamWest Development, Inc. cc: Jan Illian, Engineering Review Aaron Hollingbery, CamWest enclosure From:Universalkand Const. Co. 425 485 3186 02/23/2005 14:59 #745 P.002/002 universal jW. 1ancl SINCE CLEARING 1992 Ui1L CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 4Af34 GRADING P.O. BOX329 - 20306144THAVE. N.E. - WOODIWLLE, WA 98072 E S PHONE (425) 483-6200 FAX (425) 485-3186 STREETS UNIVELC159FIL Camwest Development Aaron Hollingbery 9720 NE 120th PL. Kirkland WA 98034 Heritage Glen City of Renton NE 20TH ST. IMPROVEMENTS EST. QTY. UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL Half street grind 1 LS $6,760.00 $6,760.00 Overlay from Aberdeen through water connection at plat entry 870 SY $8.72 $7,586.40 Asphalt thickened edge from Aberdeen to east edge plat 400 LF $4.25 $1,700.00 -marked Items taxable Sub Total $16.046.40 -Tax @8.5 $0.00 TOTAL $16,046.401 PROJECT SUMMARY SUB TOTAL TAX TOTAL NE 20TH ST. IMPROVEMENTS $16,046.40 $0.00 $16,046.40 TOTAL $16,046.40 1 Lanffrust c RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY DEVEIAPMENTI'� September 30, 2005 Mayor and City Council c/o City Clerk Municipal Building 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 90855 AddeJ arri5purderce- 10/ 2, Lt� .-,7 V b� SUBJECT: WEDGEWOOD LANE, DIVISION 2 LUA05-009 700 — 780 Hoquiam Ave NE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL: ,.-os--ooy CITY OF RENTON OCT 0 4 2005 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE til/1o' On behalf of LandTrust, Inc., I respectfully request a latecomer agreement be drawn up so that adjacent properties will be required to share in the cost of the sanitary sewer installation and associated road restoration in Hoquiam Avenue Northeast, which was required to be installed by City Code to serve the above referenced development. The properties that will benefit in the future from the sanitary sewer installation and associated road restoration in Hoquiam Avenue Northeast are located on the west side of Hoquiam Avenue, immediately adjacent to the project frontage, as shown on the attached vicinity map. Attached hereto are the estimated cost data and inventory for the installation, the legal description of the applicant's property, and a list of King County Tax Account Numbers for the benefited properties. Upon Administrative acceptance of my application, I will submit the applicable processing fee upon request. Sincerely, LANDTRUST, INC. Patrick J. Gilroy 1560140TH AVE NE SUITE 100 BELLEVUE, WA 98005 [4251747-1726 [4251747-4157 FAx WWW.LANDTRUSTINC.COM Page i of 1 WEDGEWOOD LANE DIVISION 2 LATECOMER AGREEMENT Leval Description of Applicant's Property: Parcel W: The K*% half of the Northeast Quarter of the Nortinvest Quarter of the Soud"A Quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Ranvge 5 East of the WOWnette Meridian, Mi King County, Washington; apt the West 170 filet thereat; Together with the North 82.75 feet and the South 30 feat of the West 170 feet of the North half of the "Wtheast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter d the SmAhe&g Quarter of Seta# 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East of the Wdlamette Merxftft, In King County, Washington; ExoiVt the West 30 feet corweyed to King Cm mty for Arrwdia Sehewe Road ectenSIOR Uy deed recorded under Reox4ing No. 3081014. Parcel "` - The North I6S feet of the South 330 feet of the NathebSt Quart the Whe orth irette ia, othe r Southeast Carter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range Of no County, Wastftton; emept the Wrest 30 feet corwveyed to tGng County for Arnella Sdneht Road Extension by deed recorded under Recording No. 3081014, Parcel 'tin . The West 110 feet of the North hair of the Northeast Quer W of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 10, Townsirlp 233 North, Range 5 East of the Wilkanrette Meridian, In Kong County, Waamnoton; Except the Nodh 82-75 fbet; also Except the South 141.00 feet; and E wept the West 30 feet conveyed to King County far Amelin 5chewve Rao Extension by deed recorded under Recording No. 3081014. Parcel "0": The South 141M feet of the %Nest 170 feet of the North hat of the Northeast Quarter of the Quarter of the 5oudwait Quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Rouge S EaSt or the VA#amet* meridian, in my County, Washlin9eon; Utept the Vest 30 feet conveyed to King axo ty for Amelia Schewie (toad Ut e►tsion by deed reworded under Recording No. 3081014; lend Em,rW the South 30.00 Hera thereof. Af'N: 1423W9257^07,102305-9158-07,102305-9335-03 APN: 102305-9145.03, 102305-9141-07, 102305- 9317-05 King Countv Tax Account Numbers (PID#s) For Benefited Properties: 103205-9405, 103205-9165, 103205-9164, 103205-9213 D_ r x ; / LL911LR wK B U.• _ ... , L CATIO aaml f x N �IIf Y Iq. rOLr ' iCIrONIWrr � I �'_ r � N •� A__ fi �� _ ' '_ A 1r' fIMO .YIt. •. r � i �` r � • R � � :sN - a i n r �1 « of 1 Aa PCL Pd. 8 f PCL C fv«.Ri '9 rw i►L x` r ull"" s iq r Wedgewood Lane, = - Division 2 LUA05-009 fN � JI Latecomer Agreement iw w Vicinity Map f f NORTH Not To Scale ESTTMAI LIB COST DATA AND INVENTORY Ai Estimated Cost Data and FOR POTENTIAL LATECOMER RECOVERY Inventory for Imoroveme — SUBJECT: �A/t/+/�i� �� W�=� CITY PROJECT NUMBERS: WTR- ,/ 1 WWP- SWP- Name of project TRO- TED- TO: City of Renton FROM: WEV(4F— LSId r . Plan Review Section /S(rb o`er V'&: Planning/BuIlding(PublicWorks - �v--t11!VtiG .yA fps 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 DATE: 51-5I07>:' box 62 X—C-n�+z Per the request of the City of Renton, the following information is furnished concerning costs for improvements proposed to be installed for the above referenced project. WATER SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION COSTS: Length Size Type LF. of WATERMAIN LF. of WATERMAIN LF. of WATERMAIN LF. of WATERMAIN EACH of GATE VALVES EACH of GATE VALVES EACH of GATE VALVES EACH of FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLIES (Cost of Fire Hydrants must be listed separately) Engineering Design Costs City Permit Fees Washington State Sales Tax TOTAL COST FOR WATER SYSTEM SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM: Length Size T'I- g-7 LF. of �_ " P VC SEWER MAIN LF. of SEWER MAIN LF. of SEWER MAIN EA of �d 0 DIAMETER MANHOLES Engineering Design Costs 06 $ 7 ,Zao . City Permit Fees Washington State Sales Tax S Z (Sewer Stub - line between sewer main and private property line) TOTAL COST FOR SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM Sg7. 4�r/ • ,�7 STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM: Length S17.c Type L.F. of STORM LINE LF. of STORM LINE L.F. of STORM LINE EA of STORM INLET EA of STORM CATCHBASIN EA of STORM CATCHBASW Engineering Design Costs $ City Permit Fees $ Washington State Sala Tax $ TOTAL COST FOR STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM $ STREET IMPROVEMENTS: (Including Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk, Asphalt Pavement and Street Lighting) 46-w l s-&,sw f .4s��-� L f r SIGNALIZATION: (Including Eng. Design Costs, City Permit Fees, WA St Sales Tax) STREET LIGHTING: (including Eng. Design Costs, Ciry Permit Fees, WA St Sales Tax) A e5. L. - Print signatory name fortes/COSMATA.DOC/bh r-74-[-t?yl i (day phonc#)4;-.X ' 16Ae (SIGNATURE) (Signatory must be authorized agent . or owner of subject development) PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEEE REPORT October 24, 2005 APPROVED BY QTV COUNCIL Date Public Hearing on a 2005 Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Implementing the zoning portion of Application 2005-M-1) (Referred June 13, 2005) The Planning and Development Committee recommends concurrence in the staff recommendation to set a public hearing date on November 21, 2005, to consider proposed changes to Title IV, Chapter 2 of the Development Regulations of the Renton Municipal Code, for Residential-1 and Resource Conservation zones. The proposed changes implement adopted policies in the Comprehensive Plan for the Low Density Residential designation and accompany recommended Land Use Map amendments considered as part of application 2005-M-1, Low Density Residential Map Revisions. Dan lawson, Chair Denis Law, Vice -Chair Marcie Palmer, Member cc: Alex Pietsch Rebecca Lind PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEEE REPORT October 24, 2005 Public Hearing on a 2005 Comprehensive Plan Amendments (Inclusion of West Hill) (Referred June 13, 2005) APPROVED BY CCTV COUNCIL i Data /o-ay Laos' The Planning and Development Committee recommends concurrence in the staff recommendation to set a public hearing date on November 14, 2005, to consider a proposal to include the West Hill in Renton's Potential Annexation Area and to amend the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element Map to adopt Renton land use designations for this area. L3::� C�,� Dan Clawson, Chair Denis Law, Vice -Chair Aw� /7jW-c Marcie Palmer, Member cc: Alex Pietsch Rebecca Lind APMOVED BY QTV COUNCIL 1 Date /D-ay boos' COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT October 24, 2005 Skate Park Lighting ferred September 19. 2005 The Community Services Committee recommends concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve the addition of lights to the skate park contingent on available funding in the 2007 CIP cycle. r 12�t� Toni Nelson, Chair c Marcie Palmer, Vice Chair <Zen"� Dan Clawson, Member C: Dennis Culp Sylvia Allen Leslie Betlach FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT October 24, 2005 APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL , Date 104V400SS'i APPROVAL OF CLAIMS AND PAYROLL VOUCHERS The Finance Committee approves for payment on October 24, 2005, claim vouchers 241978-242497 and 2 wire transfers, totaling $2,445,397.13 , and 587 direct deposits, payroll vouchers 60441- 60665, and 1 wire transfer, totaling $1,904,198.38 . f Don Per son, Chair Toni Nelson, Vice -Chair t Denis Law, Member TRANSPORTATION/AVIATION COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT October 24, 2005 Replacing Deferrals with Restrictive Covenants (Referred Oct. 10, 2005) APPn- OVER 13Y C'TV COUNCIL ! Date �D-a zoos The Transportation Committee recommends concurrence in the staff recommendation to set a public hearing date on November 21, 2005, to consider proposed City Code amendments to eliminate the option of deferrals subject to recording of restrictive covenants, and establishing a new option for certain short plats of voluntary payment of a fee -in -lieu for approved street improvement deferrals, Marcie Palmer, Chair Don Person, Vice -Chair - Not in Attendance - Randy Corman, Member cc: Gregg Zimmerman, PB/PW Administrator Neil Watts, Development Services Director Sandra Meyer, Transportation Services Director Kayren Kittrick, Development Engineering Supervisor Jan Illian, Engineering Specialist TRANSPORTATION/AVIATION COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT October 24, 2005 Renton Hill Access Letter of Concurrence (Referred October 10, 2005) APPPOVC-D BY CITY COUNCIL Date 1,041�- AX5_ The Transportation/Aviation Committee recommends concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve the Letter of Concurrence, which documents that the City of Renton and the Washington State Department of Transportation concur with the Renton Hill Access. The Committee further authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the Letter of Concurrence. vati,, yjml"O�� Marcie Palmer, Chair Don Persson, Vice -Chair - Not in Attendance - Randy Corman, Member cc: Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator Sandra Meyer, Transportation Systems Director Nick Afzali, Transportation Systems Planning and Programming Manager Connie Brundage, Transportation Systems Administrative Secretary HATRANSWDMIMCOMWTTEE REPORTS\2005\Renton Hill Access.doc\rev 01/04 bh j%dopled CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. ,5 77F A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, SETTING A HEARING DATE TO VACATE A PORTION OF ROSARIO AVENUE SE, NORTH OF SE 2ID PLACE. (JAMES JACQUES; VAC-05- 004) WHEREAS, a Petition has been filed with the City Clerk of the City of Renton on or about August 25, 2005, pursuant to the requirements of RCW 35.79, petitioning for the vacation of a portion of Rosario Avenue SE, as hereinafter more particularly described, and said petition having been signed by the owners of more than two-thirds (2/3) of the property abutting upon said street sought to be vacated, and same being described as follows: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. [The easterly five feet of the right-of-way on Rosario Ave. SE, north of SE 2"6 Place]. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. That the 21 st day of November, 2005, at the hour of 7:00 P.M. at the City Council Chambers at City Hall, Renton, King County, Washington, is hereby fixed as the time and place for a public hearing to consider the aforesaid Petition for vacating one portion of Rosario Avenue SE, north of SE 2" d Place, which said hearing date is not more than sixty nor less than twenty days from the date of passage of this Resolution. SECTION II. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to give notice of the time and date of this hearing as provided by RCW 35.79.020 and any and/or all persons interested therein or objecting to this vacation may then appear and be heard thereon, or they 1 RESOLUTION NO. may file their written objections thereto with the City Clerk at or prior to the time of hearing on the vacation. SECTION III. The City Council shall determine, as provided by RCW 35.79.030, as to whether an appraisal shall be secured to determine their fair market value of the property sought to be vacated as provided for in Ordinance No. 4266, and the amount of compensation to be paid by the Petitioner -Owners to the City for such vacation. The City likewise reserves the right to retain an easement for public utility and related purposes. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES. 1139:10/ 18/05 :ma day of , 2005. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk day of , 2005. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor 2 EXHIBIT "A" STREET VACATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION A STRIP OF LAND 5 FEET IN WIDTH LYING ALONG THE EASTERLY PORTION OF 152ND AVENUE SE RIGHT OF WAY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF 152ND AVENUE SE AND SE 136TH STREET, - THENCE NORTH 00023'56" EAST ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF 152ND AVENUE SE A DISTANCE OF 186.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88000' 19" EAST A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING' THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 88000' 19" EAST A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF 152ND AVENUE SE. - THENCE SOUTH 00023'56" WEST ALONG THE SAID EASTERLY MARGIN A DISTANCE OF 132.92 FEET TO A POINT ON CURVE TO THE LEFT; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET, ARC LENGTH OF 38.57 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 88024' 15" TO A POINT OF TANGENCY, BEING A POINT ON THE NORTH MARGIN OF SE 136TH STREET, - THENCE NORTH 88000' 19" WEST ALONG SAID MARGIN A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET TO A POINT ON CURVE TO THE RIGHT; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET, ARC LENGTH OF 38.57 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 88°24' 15" TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 00023'56" EAST A DISTANCE OF 132.92 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING SITUATED WITH THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTRY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON u — V N D 3 OF SECTION " BRASS SURFACE DISC DISC _ (AUGUST, 2005) LOT 29 Q I / I vI UNPLATfED �1 5' 30' 30' LOT 28 25' N 88'00'19" W 274.25' � VI � �— Be V VACAA TED N LOT 27 LLJ p� / w ui N _ � n I Q M h N 1 -) I N o uj LOT 1 OF KING COUNTY SHORT PLAT NUMBER to $ 484106, AS RECORDED UNDER KING COUNBTY N m p -n RECORDING NO. 7505170617. ^ 0 N SITUATE THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, Z p IN LOT 26 Z STATE OF WASHINGTON cc I R=25.00 L= 38.57 30 30' Ton=24.31 Delto=88'24'15" R=25.00 L=38.57 i Tan=24.31 Delta=88'24'15" k. r: L5.00' N 88'00'19" W 249.94' — b N 88'00'19" W � SE 136TH STREET I LOT I I LOT 2 7— LOT 3 LOT LOTS I LOT 6 T LOT B LOT 7 HIGHLAND ESTATES REC NO 200.0205000023 1 /s-FNQd4Xj /D-17-OS Ado,Okd /o-a l- aaos CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ANNEXING CERTAIN TERRITORY OF THE CITY OF RENTON (PARK TERRACE — EXPANDED ANNEXATION; FILE NO. A-04-002) WHEREAS, under the provisions of RCW 35A 14.120 as amended, a petition in writing requesting that certain territory contiguous to the City of Renton, as described below, be annexed to the City of Renton, was presented and fled with the City Clerk on or about September 16, 2004; and WHEREAS, prior to the filing and circulation of said petition for annexation to the City of Renton, the petitioning owners notified the City Council of their intention to commence such proceedings as provided by law, as more particularly specified in RCW 35A 14.120, and upon public hearing thereon, it having been determined and the petitioning owners having agreed to assume the pre-existing outstanding indebtedness of the City of Renton as it pertains to the territory petitioned to be annexed; and to accept that portion of the City's Comprehensive Plan as it pertains to the territory including the applicable Zoning Code relating thereto; and WHEREAS, the King County Department of Assessments examined and verified the signatures on the petition for annexation and determined signatures represent acreage, as provided by law, in excess of sixty percent (60%) of the area to be annexed; and WHEREAS, the City Council, after due notice and publication, held a public hearing on the 60% Direct Petition and possible future zoning for the initial 7.65-acre annexation site on 1 ORDINANCE NO. December 20, 2004, and at that time accepted the 60% Direct Petition and authorized the sending of the "Notice of Intention" to the Boundary Review Board for King County; and WHEREAS, during the Boundary Review Board's mandatory 45-day review period the City `invoked" the Boundary Review Board's jurisdiction by letter on March 22, 2005, requesting the expansion of the initial annexation by some 72.35 acres; and WHEREAS, the Boundary Review Board for King County, after duly publishing and posting the expanded area, held a public hearing in Renton on May 24, 2005, to consider Renton's request to expand the boundaries of the initial 7.65-acre annexation site; and WHEREAS, the Boundary Review Board for King County issued its proceedings and hearing decision on July 14, 2005, expanding the boundaries of the Park Terrace Annexation to 80.0 acres; and WHEREAS, no appeals of the Boundary Review Board's decision were filed with King County Superior Court within 30 days of its decision; and WHEREAS, the Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department of the City of Renton having considered and recommended the annexing of said expanded annexation area to the City of Renton; and WHEREAS, the City Council fixed September 12, 2005, and October 3, 2005, as the time and place for public hearings in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, Renton, Washington, 2 ORDINANCE NO. upon the expanded area and future zoning for it, and notice thereof having been given as provided by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council continued the October 3, 2005, public hearing until October 17, 2005, more than 30 days after its first public hearing; and WHEREAS, pursuant to said notices, public hearings having been held at the time and place specified in the notices, and the Council having considered all matters in connection with the annexation and having further determined that all legal requirements and procedures of the law applicable to the petition method for annexation have been met; and WHEREAS, the King County Boundary Review Board having deemed the "Notice of Intention" approved as modified on July 16, 2005; and R 10; WHEREAS, the City of Renton is concurrently prezoning the annexation site R-8 and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. All requirements of the law in regard to the annexation by petition method, including the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120, 130, 140 and 150, have been met. It is further determined that the petition for annexation to the City of Renton of the property and territory described below is hereby approved and granted; the following described property being contiguous to the City limits of the City of Renton is hereby annexed to the City of Renton, and such annexation to be effective after the approval, passage, and publication of this Ordinance; and 3 ORDINANCE NO. on and after said date the property shall constitute a part of the City of Renton and shall be subject to all its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in force and effect; the property being described as follows: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. [Said property, approximately 80 acres, is generally located south, east, and north of existing City of Renton boundaries and more specifically, east of Anacortes Avenue NE, if extended, south of SE 112t' Street, if extended, north of SE 122nd Street, if extended, and west of Hoquiam Avenue NE (144u' Avenue SE), if extended, as shown on Exhibit "A".] The owners -petitioners of the property shall assume the pre-existing outstanding indebtedness of the City of Renton as prescribed in RCW 35A 14.120 as it pertains to the property, and the property is subject to the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. SECTION IL This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and thirty days after its publication. A certified copy of this Ordinance shall be filed with the King County Council, State of Washington, and as otherwise provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2005. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 2005. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor n ORDINANCE NO. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD. 1212:10/7/05:ma EXHIBIT A PARK TERRACE ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of the northeast quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington, lying northerly and easterly of the existing City Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 3553; TOGETHER WITH that portion of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 10, lying westerly and southerly of the existing City Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 5097, EXCEPT the south 30 feet thereof; and TOGETHER WITH the south 165 feet of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 10, EXCEPT the west 30 feet of the south 30 feet thereof; and TOGETHER WITH that portion of the west half (1/2) of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 10, lying westerly of the existing City Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 5097, and lying southerly and westerly of the existing City Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 4215; and TOGETHER WITH that portion of the east half (1/2) of the northwest quarter of said Section 10, lying easterly of the existing City Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 2000, No. 5012, No. 2210, No. 4383 and No. 3058, lying westerly of the existing City Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 2945, and lying southerly and westerly of the existing City Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 4215. - r r_NF--T r-r-_i i-t&4n - t_ 7 w I I It— — ---1 I I Park Terrace Annexation Figure 1: Vicinity Map G1^0� Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Alex Pietsch, Adnumstrutor 0 Del Rosuno FN-,t.p I August 2005 IIII �1 ;.. G z— a� Q 0 600 1200 1 : 7200 o Proposed Annexation Area o Proposed Hoquiam Annexation Area CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 6W 2 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ESTABLISHING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY ANNEXED WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM R-4 (URBAN RESIDENTIAL 4 DU PER ACRE, KING COUNTY ZONING), R 6 (URBAN RESIDENTIAL 6 DU PER ACRE, KING COUNTY), AND R 8 (URBAN RESIDENTIAL 8 DU PER ACRE, KING COUNTY) TO R-8 (RESIDENTIAL 8 DU/AC; EIGHT DWELLING UNITS PER NET ACRE) (PARK TERRACE — EXPANDED ANNEXATION; FILE NO. A-04-002). WHEREAS, under Section 4.2.020 of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington," as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has not been zoned in the City of Renton; and WHEREAS, property owners within the original annexation area petitioned the City of Renton for annexation and concurrent rezoning; WHEREAS, the original annexation area having been expanded by the Boundary Review Board for King County on or about July 15, 2005, from 7.65 acres to approximately 80 acres, the latter which had previously not been considered for rezoning; WHEREAS, the City having now held two public hearings to consider zoning for the expanded area, the first hearing on zoning being held on September 12, 2005, and the second hearing being held on October 3, 2005, and continued to October 17, 2005, and said zoning being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly 1 ORDINANCE NO. considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby zoned to R-8, to wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. [Said property, approximately 63.0 acres, is generally located south of SE 112' Street, if extended, and east of Anacortes Avenue NE (1361' Ave SE), if extended, north of SE 122na Street, if extended, and west of 1446 Avenue SE, if extended. Said property includes Tracts I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, and IX, as shown as a part of this exhibit.] The annual ordinance adopting the maps of the City's Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended to evidence said rezoning and the EDNSP Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning. SECTION IL This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and thirty days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2005. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk 2 ORDINANCE NO. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2005. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1211:10/7/05:ma 3 Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor EXHIBIT A TRACT I — LEGAL DESCRIPTION The west half (1/2) of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion lying westerly and southerly of the existing City Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No.5012; EXCEPT the west half of the north half of the north half of said subdivision; and EXCEPT the north 230 feet of the East half of said subdivision; TOGETHER WITH the south 125 feet of the west 142.2 feet of said north 230 feet of the East half of said subdivision; EXCEPT roads. TRACT II — LEGAL DESCRIPTION The northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington; EXCEPT roads. TRACT III — LEGAL DESCRIPTION The northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington; EXCEPT roads. TRACT IV — LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of the south half (1/2) of the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington, lying easterly of the existing City Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 3058; EXCEPT roads. TRACT V — LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of the northeast quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington, lying northerly and easterly of the existing City Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 3553; EXCEPT roads. TRACT VI — LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of the northwest quarter of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington, lying westerly and southerly of the existing City Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 4215; EXCEPT roads. TRACT VII — LEGAL DESCRIPTION The southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH the north half (1/2) of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington; EXCEPT roads. TRACT VIII — LEGAL DESCRIPTION The south half (1/2) of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington; EXCEPT roads. TRACT IX — LEGAL DESCRIPTION The south 165 feet of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. EXCEPT roads. N ;NE t rat 1. '7 A —it- il. Lk Park Terrace Annexation R-8 Zoning Map ILUMli 0 6W 1200 "U."'mummw m-, Eclficclk 7200 t fki ku R-8 Zme .,I 09� sf/teQ�� /o- l7-Ds AdoPfed 10 aft oos CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 5/6.9 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ESTABLISHING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY ANNEXED WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM R-6 (URBAN RESIDENTIAL 6 DU PER ACRE, KING COUNTY ZONING) TO R-10 (RESIDENTIAL 10 DU/AC; TEN DWELLING UNITS PER NET ACRE) (PARK TERRACE — EXPANDED ANNEXATION; FILE NO. A-04- 002). WHEREAS, under Section 4.2.020 of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington," as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has not been zoned in the City of Renton; and WHEREAS, property owners within the original annexation area petitioned the City of Renton for annexation and concurrent rezoning; WHEREAS, the original annexation area having been expanded by the Boundary Review Board for King County on or about July 15, 2005, from 7.65 acres to approximately 80 acres, the latter which had previously not been considered for rezoning; WHEREAS, the City having held two public hearings to consider zoning for the expanded area, the first hearing on zoning being held on September 12, 2005 and the second hearing being held on October 3, 2005, and continued to October 17, 2005, and said zoning being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly 1 ORDINANCE NO. considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby zoned to R-8, to wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. [Said property, approximately 3.4 acres, is located generally south of SE 112,` Street, if extended, east of Anacortes Avenue NE (136t` Avenue SE), if extended north of SE 113 Street, if extended, and west of Duvall Avenue NE (138 Avenue SE), if extended. Said property includes Tract I, as shown as a part of this exhibit.] The annual ordinance adopting the maps of the City's Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended to evidence said rezoning and the EDNSP Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning. SECTION IL This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and thirty days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of Bonnie 1. Walton, City Clerk 2 2005. ORDINANCE NO. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2005. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1213:10/7/05:ma EXHIBIT A TRACT I - LEGAL DESCRIPTION The northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH the north 230 feet of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of said Section 10; EXCEPT the south 125 feet of the west 142.5 feet thereof; EXCEPT roads. TT - — - - - - - -- - -K -A LLJ Z ----- - - - C Q -- _ o - - -- -- - © �- T St _ T T - =411 1 1Eaa] 111111 ��' 111111 � WA WIN Park Terrace Annexation 0 600 1200 R-10 Zoning Map tiro Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning 1 ' / 200 ♦I: l� Alex Pietsch, Administrator "►J G. Del Rosario R-1 o Zone ANTOZ 23 September 2005 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO_ /S/ %pead"'v /0-/1-os 1 q lid AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, VACATING A PORTION OF LYONS AVENUE NE, LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 144 FEET SOUTH OF NE 4TH STREET, ON THE WESTERLY HALF OF THE ROAD, FOR A DISTANCE OF APPROXIMATELY 100 FEET. (STEVE BECK & CORE DESIGN [BALES] VAC 04-002). WHEREAS, a proper petition for vacating a portion of Lyons Avenue NE, located approximately 144 feet south of NE 40' Street, on the westerly half of the road, was filed with the City Clerk on June 15, 2004, and that petition was signed by the owners representing more than two-thirds (2/3) of the property abutting upon the street or alley to be vacated; and WHEREAS, the City Council, by Resolution No. 3702, passed on July 26, 2004, set August 23, 2004, at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the City of Renton as the time and place for a public hearing on this matter; and the City Clerk having given proper notice of this hearing as provided by law, and all persons having been heard who appeared to testify in favor or in opposition on this matter, and the City Council having considered all information and arguments presented to it; and WHEREAS, the Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department has considered this petition for vacation, and has found it to be in the public interest and for the public benefit, and that no injury or damage to any person or properties will result from this vacation; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The following described portion of Lyons Avenue NE, to wit: 1 ORDINANCE NO. A portion of Lyons Avenue NE, located approximately 144 feet south of NE 4t' Street, on the westerly half of the road, for a distance of approximately 100 feet, described more particularly in Exhibits "A" and `B" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein, be and the same is hereby vacated. SECTION U. The City Council hereby elects to charge a fee of $13,100 (Thirteen Thousand, One Hundred Dollars) to the petitioner -owners, which has been paid to the City. SECTION III. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after its publication. A certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed with the Office of Records and Elections, and as otherwise provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD. 1203:10/4/05:ma 2 Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk day of Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor 2005. 2005. EXHIBIT A CORE DESIGN, INC. BELLEVUE WA 98007 Core Project No: 02087 4/16/04 Legal Description — Right -of -Way Vacation That portion of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington described as follows: COMMENCING at the northwest corner of Morgan Place II, according to the Short Plat thereof recorded in Volume 152 of Plats, pages 248 and 248B under Recording No. 20020607900006, records of said county, thence S00°21'l3"W, along the west line of said Short Plat and the east right-of-way margin of Lyons Avenue NE as established by City of Renton Ordinance No. 4958, recorded under Recording No. 20020404000988, records of said county, 144.61 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described tract; thence continuing S00°21' 13", along said west line and east margin 103.52 feet to the southwesterly corner of said Short Plat; thence N65°01'55"W, along the northwesterly prolongation of the southerly line of said Short Plat 33.00 feet to the east line of Tract 2, Black Loam five acre Tracts, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, page 101, records of said county and the west right-of-way margin of said Lyons Avenue NE; thence N00°21'l3"E, along the east line of said Tract 2 and west margin 90.45 feet to the north line of the south half of said Tract 2; thence S88°21'11"E, along the easterly prolongation of said north line, 30.01 feet; to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Contains 2,009 ± square feet (0.0668 ± acres) i s 4 1 1981.92 N-E- 4TH ST. FOUND 3" BRASS SURFACE DISC WI TH PUNCH TRACT 2 EXHIBIT B N88-21'16"W 2642.56 MEA. (2647.0 PLAT) AA -JO 11 70 ` 660.64 i 5 14 (S.E. 128TN ST.) BLACK LOAM FIVE ACRE TRACTS, VOL. 12. PG. 101 N. LINE, S. 1/2 TRACT 2 N88-21'11 "W AREA OF RIGHT OF - WAY TO BE VACATED SIENNA VOL 209. PG'S_ 18-24. REC. NO. 20021009002754 AMBER LANE RIGHT OF WAY VACATION EXHIBIT N MORGAN PLACE 11 VOL 152, PG'S_ 248-2488. REC. NO. 20020607900006 1 FOUND 3" BRASS — SURFACE DISK STAMPED "KING COUNTY MON" W/PUNCH RENTON CONTROL MON_ NO. 1852 2 1 J PAGE 14711 W 2M Plaos, #101 �� 6cficwe, Wasfi:nptw� 98007 425.8857877 Fax 425.8857963 DESIGN ENGINEERING - PLANNING - SURVEYING JOB NO_ 0208?' SCALE- 1' = 60 0 30 60 C of xiee r f O� .+ S1655 o ay'r�t s r sit �. t L LA0 l S-/ readtny i0 i 7-6tS Adgkd /D-d �- o� CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, VACATING A PORTION OF N. 14T11 STREET EAST OF LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. N. AND GENE COULON BEACH PARK (POOL BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION, L.L.C., PETITIONERS; VAC-05-001). WHEREAS, a proper petition for vacating a portion of N. 14th Street east of Lake Washington Blvd. N. and Gene Coulon Beach Park, was filed with the City Clerk on January 24, 2005, and that petition was signed by the owners representing more than two- thirds (2/3) of the property abutting upon the street or alley to be vacated; and WHEREAS, the City Council, by Resolution No. 3740, passed on March 7, 2005, set April 02005, at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the City of Renton as the time and place for a public hearing on this matter; and the City Clerk having given proper notice of this hearing as provided by law, and all persons having been heard who appeared to testify in favor or in opposition on this matter, and the City Council having considered all information and arguments presented to it; and WHEREAS, the Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department has considered this petition for vacation, and has found it to be in the public interest and for the public benefit, and that no injury or damage to any person or properties will result from this vacation; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L The following described portion of N. 14"h Street, to wit: A portion of N. 140' Street east of Lake Washington Blvd. N. and Gene Coulon Beach Park, described more particularly in Exhibits "A" and `B" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein, be and the same is hereby vacated. 1 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION U. The City Council hereby elects to charge a fee of $21,285 (Twenty - One Thousand, Two Hundred and Eighty -Five Dollars) to the petitioner -owners, which has been paid to the City. SECTION M. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after its publication. A certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed with the Office of Records and Elections, and as otherwise provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 2005. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2005. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1205:10/4/05:ma 2 Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Exhibit A Legal Description — Street Vacation (Portion of North 14th Street): The southerly 30 feet of the 60-foot right-of-way delineated as Morgan Avenue in C.D. Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden Division 5, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, Page 83, Records of King County, Washington, lying westerly of State Highway 405 and easterly of Lake Washington Boulevard North. Situate in the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 5, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. EXHIBIT B Vicinity Map Street Vacation VAC-05-001 Petitioner: Pool Brothers Construction, LLC Gene Coulon Beach Park N. 14th St. Vacation Request Vicinity Map 0 200 400 1:2400 Technical Services ♦ ♦ Planning/Building/Public Yorks K. McFar and Feb. 25. 2005 I-405