HomeMy WebLinkAboutECF_SEPA_220415_V1.pdfSEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Purpose of checklist:
Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your
proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization
or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental
impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal.
Instructions for applicants:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please
answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult
with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use "not applicable" or
"does not apply" only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown.
You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate
answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision -
making process.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of
time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal
or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your
answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant
adverse impact.
Instructions for Lead Agencies:
Please adjust the format of this template as needed. Additional information may be necessary to
evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse
impacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to
make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is
responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents.
Use of checklist for nonproject proposals:
For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the applicable
parts of sections A and B plus the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D) Please
completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project," "applicant," and "property or
site" should be read as "proposal," "proponent," and "affected geographic area," respectively. The lead
agency may exclude (for non -projects) questions in Part B - Environmental Elements —that do not
contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal.
A. Background HELP
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
Towns on 12th
2. Name of applicant:
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 1 of 16
Madrona Place LLC
CIO Benjamin Paulus
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
18300 Redmond Way, Suite 120
Redmond, WA 98052
425-629-3854
4. Date checklist prepared:
February 04, 2022
5. Agency requesting checklist:
City of Renton, WA
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
Clearing and grading is anticipated to begin in 2023, with construction in the 2023 and
completion planned for 2024.
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or
connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.
No, there are no plans for facture additions.
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be
prepared, directly related to this proposal.
An Offsite Wetland Rating Summary was prepared by Altmann Oliver Associates, LLC
in February 2021.
An Arborist Report was prepared by Greenforest Incorporated in January 2022.
A Traffic Impact Analysis was prepared by Transportation Engineering Northwest
(TENW) in February 2022.
A Geotechnical Report and an Environmental Site Assessment was prepared by Terra
Associates, Inc. in August 2021 and January 2022.
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
None at this time.
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
Unit Lot Subdivision/Plat, Grading Permit, Street Modification Permit, Building
Permits, & SEPA Determination
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size
of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to
describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this
page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project
description.)
The proposal includes the development of 92 townhomes through the preliminary
subdivision, unit lot subdivision, process. Access will be gained from NE 12°i Street via
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197.11.960) July 2016 Page 2 of 16
one public roadway terminating with a cul-de-sac. Six public alleys will provide access
for the rear -loading townhomes. Onsite recreation facilities and stormwater
infrastructure will be included. Tree retention, landscaping, and buffer conservation of
onsite steep slopes and an offsite wetland will be observed as well.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise
location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and
range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or
boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic
map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you
are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications
related to this checklist.
The location of the proposal includes seven parcels at approximately 6.55 acres in total, inside
the City of Renton's city limits, less than a half mile from the intersection of Union Avenue
NE, & NE 1211' Street. No addresses are assigned, but the parcels are also identified as
Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs) 042305-9063, -9099, -9067, -9140, -9101, -9100, and -9247,
in Section 4, Township 23, Range 5. The legal description, site plan, vicinity snap, and
topographic reap can be found on the plan set submitted with this SEPA review.
B. Environmental Elements HELP
1. Earth hel
a. General description of the site:
(circle one): Flat, rollin hilly, stee slo es mountainous, other
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
The steepest slope is approximately 65% on the northeastern portion of the project nearest the
ROW of NE Sunset Boulevard. Topography varies across the site. The overall elevation
change is roughly 38 feet from the highest points in the south-central region and lowest points
to the north.
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat,
muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any
agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in
removing any of these soils.
Soil types listed by the NRSC Web Soil Survey Map are Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 8 to
15 percent slopes, and Arents, Alderwood material, 6 to 15 percent slopes. There are no
agricultural lands of long-term significance. Any removal of soils onsite will be in accordance
with the City of Federal Way's clearing and grading requirements.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so,
describe.
There are historical records of landslides in the area to the northwest down stream of Honey
Dew Creek, and farther south on Maple Creek. Per the WA State DNR Geologic Information
Portal, there are no indications or history of unstable soils onsite or in the immediate vicinity.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 3 of 16
e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of
any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.
Grading is proposed in the development to ensure proper roadway configuration, site
drainage, stormwater management, and building envelopes. Approximately 13,355 CY of cut
and 13,250 CY of fill is anticipated. The source of fill dirt has not been determined yet.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe.
Erosion could occur as a result of clearing and grading during construction. However, best
management practices (BMPs) through the implementation of a SWPPP and CESCL will be
utilized to minimize erosion and ensure sediment control.
About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project
construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
Approximately 56% of the subject site will be covered by impervious surfaces post
construction.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any:
A Construction Storm Water General Permit (CSWGP) from WA State Dept. of Ecology is
required due to the site being larger than one acre in size. The CSWGP requires a Storm
Water Pollution and Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation
Control (TESL) Plan that will be prepared and implemented prior to start of construction.
2. Air h[ elpl
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction,
operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and
give approximate quantities if known.
Temporary impacts include construction -related vehicle exhaust and dust particles dispersed
from sawing, cutting, and manipulating materials onsite. Any spray -on material applications,
such as paint or insulation, should be applied following OSHA and ISO guidelines for
installation and clean up management.
b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so,
generally describe.
No, off -site sources of emissions would be those typical for residential neighborhoods, such as
automobile exhaust and fareplace/heating infrastructure.
Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any:
Construction impacts are not anticipated to be significant and can be control through BMP
implementation, such as aggregate construction entrances, truck wash stations, or spray -truck
watering for exposed soils.
3. Water hel
a. Surface Water: hf e
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including
year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe
type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197.11.960) July 2016 Page 4 of 16
There is a category III wetland located offsite to the southwest. Honey Dew Creek is
located offsite to the north-northeast more than 200 feet from the project site.
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described
waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
Yes, the wetland will be within 200 feet of the proposed development, and critical area
buffers will be observed. Honey Dew Creek is more than 200 feet away from the site.
Please reference the associated Offshe Wetland Rating Summary prepared by
Altmann Oliver Associates included with this SEPA Review submittal.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed
from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected.
Indicate the source of fill material.
No filling or dredging of surface water or wetlands are anticipated.
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No, the proposal is not anticipated to require surface water withdrawals or diversions.
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan.
No, the project site is not located inside of a 100 year floodplain. The subject parcel is located
within FEMA FIRM Panel 53033C0668G, Zone X, and noted as an area of minimal flood
hazard.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
No, the proposal does not involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters.
b. Ground Water: hf e
1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so,
give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities
withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
The proposed development is located inside the Highlands 565 Pressure Zone and will be
served by the City of Renton, a public water system. No wells and no groundwater
withdrawals are anticipated.
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or
other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the
following chemicals... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the
number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the
number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
The proposed development will be served by the City of Renton, a public sanitary sewer
system, and no industrial or agricultural uses are anticipated.
c. Water runoff (including stormwater):
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 5 of 16
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection
and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow?
Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe.
Runoff will be generated from driveways, sidewalks, right-of-ways, and structures, and will be
captured and discharged into an underground detention vault located to the north. Stormwater
management infrastructure will be sized according to the capacity requirements listed in the
WA State Dept. of Ecology's (DOE) Stormwater Management Manual for Western WA and
the 2017 Renton Surface Water Design Manual. A National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) construction storinwater permit is required.
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.
Generally, no. Stormwater infrastructure will include treatment mechanisms and/or flow
control applications to prevent the discharge of waste into the environment. The potential for
illicit discharges and petroleum hydrocarbons from construction vehicles will be managed
through the associated project SWPPP. After construction, potential pollutants include
roadway runoff and landscaping applications.
3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If
so, describe.
No, drainage patterns will only be affected within the limits of the development. Stormwater
generated in the vicinity of the project will remain in its natural drainage basins at pre -
development rates.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage
pattern impacts, if any:
No drainage impacts anticipated, therefore, no mitigation measures are triggered. See answer
to Questions (c)(1) for control and mitigation methods. Also please refer to the provided site
plan sets for further details.
4. Plants hI elpl
a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site:
_✓_deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
_✓_evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
✓ shrubs
grass
pasture
crop or grain
Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops.
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
Selective alteration or removal of vegetation will occur for the construction of roads and
dwellings. Trees will be retained pursuant to the applicable Code requirements. New
vegetation will be planted.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11.960) July 2016 Page 6 of 16
c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site.
No threatened or endangered species are known to be on or near the site.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance
vegetation on the site, if any:
Proposed landscaping may include the use of native or drought resistantplants. Invasive
species found on site will be removed to enhance existing and planted vegetation. Please
reference the landscaping Plan submitted with this development proposal.
e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site.
Per WSDA Noxious Weed Data Viewer, Tansy Ragwort has been reported on the project site.
It is highly probable that Himalayan Blackberry is on the project site as well.
5. Animals hf e
a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known
to be on or near the site.
Examples include:
birds: hawk heron, eagle, son birds other:
mammals: M bear, elk, beaver, other:
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other
b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site.
No threatened or endangered species are known to be on or near the site and
according to the WSFW PHS interactive web map, there are no listed or candidate
species occurrences listed.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
Yes, the site, like all of Western Washington, lies within the Pacific Flyway Migratory Route.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
To help preserve and enhance wildlife, the project is proposing the meet the required tree
retention and landscaping requirements to support animal species in the area.
e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site.
No invasive animal species are known to on or near the site.
6. Energy and Natural Resources h[ elp�
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet
the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating,
manufacturing, etc.
Electricity and natural gas through Puget Sound Energy will be the primary source of energy
used to provide heating and cooling to each dwelling. The builder will provide the appropriate
heating and cooling systems with are energy efficient and cost effective for the homebuyer.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197.11-960) July 2016 Page 7 of 16
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties?
If so, generally describe.
No, the project will not affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal?
List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any:
The proposed dwelling will be constructed in conformance with the applicable International
Residential Code and State Energy Code standards. Energy conserving materials and fixtures
will be evaluated for suitability in all new construction. Homes designed to be energy efficient
are common in this area.
7. Environmental Health hf eM
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk
of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal?
If so, describe.
The site of the proposal is located within the Tacoma Smelter Plume detect area. According to
WA Dept. of Ecology's Dirt Alert interactive mapping tool, the potential detection of
contaminants are below state clean up levels.
1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses.
According to the WA DOE Toxic Cleanup program interactive map, there are no known
additional contamination events at the site from past or present uses.
2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development
and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines
located within the project area and in the vicinity.
No known additional existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that would affect the proposal.
3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced
during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating
life of the project.
Any chemicals stored onsite would be typical of residential home usage, such as paint,
fertilizers, and automotive lubricants. During construction, use of heavy trucks onsite will be
common, but spill control plans and standard automotive maintenance practices performed by
the contractor will be in place throughout the construction phase.
4) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
No known requirements for special emergency services.
5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
No additional existing hazards are known, and the contractor onsite will be required to
following all standard OSHA, L&I and WA DOE spill prevention plan requirements.
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example:
traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
The main source of off -site noise in this area originates from the vehicular traffic present on
NE Sunset Boulevard, NE 121 Street, and nearby local access streets. This is not anticipated
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 8 of 16
to negatively affect the proposal.
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a
short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indi-
cate what hours noise would come from the site.
Short-term noise impacts will result from the use of construction and building equipment
during site development and home construction. These temporary activities will be limited to
legal working hours as prescribed by City Code. Long-term impacts will be those associated
with the increase of human population, additional traffic and noise associated with residential
areas.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
Building construction will be done during the hours prescribed by the city.
8. Land and Shoreline Use hf elp]
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current
land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe.
North: Multi -Family (Condos)
East: Commercial (Retail & Office), & Single -Family Residential
South: Single -Family Residential
West: Single -Family Residential
Current proposal does not affect current land uses.
b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe.
How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to
other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated,
how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or
nonforest use?
There will be no impact on agriculture or forest lands as this parcel has been a privately
owned property for many years and is not currently used as agriculture or forest land.
1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal
business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides,
tilling, and harvesting? If so, how:
No, there are no known farm or forest uses in the vicinity.
c. Describe any structures on the site.
Three single-family residences and associated outbuildings are on Parcel numbers
042305-9067, -9101, and -9247. The remaining parcels are vacant of structures or
development.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
Demolition of the above -mentioned residence and accessory structures are pending
and associated with City of Renton Permit number B050306.
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
The subject properties are split -zoned Parcel numbers 042305-9063, -9099, and -9067
are zoned RM-F (Residential Multi family), and parcel numbers 042305-9140, -9101, -
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 9 of 16
9100, and -9247 are zoned R-10 (Residential-10). The RM-F zoning District totals
234,659 square feet and the R-10 zoning district totals 50,545 square feet.
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
All subject parcels have the zoning designation of Residential High Density. The
parcels are also located within the Highlands Community Planning Area.
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site?
Not applicable.
Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify.
Yes, a category III wetland is partially located onsite to the southwest, and steep slopes
follow along the frontage of NE Sunset Boulevard. Please reference the associated
Offsite Wetland Rating Summary prepared by Altmann Oliver Associates and
Geotechnical Report by Terra Associates, Inc., both included with this SEPA Review
submittal.
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
Per the US Census Quick Facts from the 2015-2019 population dataset there are 2.57persons
per household in City of Renton. Based on this dataset, approximately 236 individuals will
reside within the completed project. (92 DUs X 2.57 persons per household = 236.44 persons)
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
Two single-family residences on parcel ntimbers 042305-9101 and 0423 05-924 7 are occupied.
Based on the above population projection five people will be displaced. The residence on
parcel number 042305-9067 is vacant.
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
No measures proposed.
L. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land
uses and plans, if any:
The proposal is located within the Urban Design District B. Site design is regulated per local
and state code, and the land use is approved in this zoning district so it will be compatible with
existing and projected land use plans.
m. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to agricultural and forest lands of long-term
commercial significance, if any:
None, there are no known agricultural or forest lands in the vicinity.
9. Housing 1hglo
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or
low-income housing.
The project will provide 92 new residences. The new residences are anticipated to be market
rate, fee simple homes in the middle -income housing range.
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low-income housing.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 10 of 16
Two middle -income dwelling units will be eliminated. One of the three existing residential
structures is currently vacant.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
Other than being regulated by local and state code, there are no measures to reduce or control
housing impacts.
10. Aesthetics IbLeM
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is
the principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
The tallest height of any proposed structure will be the maximum height allowed by local code.
Exterior materials may be wood, cement board siding or other materials allowed by building
codes.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
There should be no impact upon views in the immediate vicinity.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
Since the proposal does not anticipate obstructing or altering any views, all measures to
reduce or control aesthetic impacts will be regulated by local code.
11. Light and Glare hf elpl
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly
occur?
Minimal light and glare will be a result of residential lighting and traffic which will occur
early in the morning and late in the evening.
Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?
No safety hazards related to light or glare is anticipated Typical building materials, such as
wood, masonry, brick, or composite, to not commonly produce glare that would pose a safety
hazard.
c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
No impacts from off -site light or glare are anticipated as a result of the surrounding
residential uses. Some lighting will affect the eastern portion of the development during
standard business hours due to neighboring commercial uses.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
The project will be designed to minimize light and glare.
12. Recreation IbLeM
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?
Oliver M. Hazen High School is a half mile to the east, and honey Dew Elementary
School is about a half mile to the south. Also, a half mile to the south is Kiwanis Park.
Both, North Highland Park and Honey Creek Trail are approximately one driving mile
to the northwest.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 11 of 16
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe.
No displacement of recreational uses is anticipated since the site is currently vacant.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation
opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:
Common open space facilities are required onsite per municipal code requirements. Please
refer to the provided site plan sets for the location of the facilities and further details.
13. Historic and cultural preservation hj elpl
a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years
old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers? If so,
specifically describe.
There are no known buildings, structures or sites located on or near the proposal site
area that are in or eligible for listing in preservation registers.
Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation?
This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts,
or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies
conducted at the site to identify such resources.
There are not any landmarks or features, such as cemeteries or other evidence of Indian or
historic use by regional tribe affiliations. If an archaeological site or artifact is found during
construction, the appropriate Historical Preservation Professional will be notified.
c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources
on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of
archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc.
According to DAHP's WISSARD predictive model, the site is listed as Moderately Low and
Moderate Risk.
d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance
to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required.
No measures are currently proposed. If an archaeological site or artifact is found during
construction, the appropriate historical Preservation Professional will be notified
14. Transportation hf elp]
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and
describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
The site is served by NE 1211, Street. The development of the parcel will include internal
access via a public roadway with a cul-de-sac termination. Multiple public alleys will
be utilized throughout the project.
b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally
describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop?
Yes, Sound Transit operates the Renton Way Transit Center located less than 2 miles from the
project site. Metro Transit provides routes in the immediate area around the project and in
between the Renton and Bellevue Transit Centers. Bus stops are located along NE 12"' Street.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 12 of 16
c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non -project proposal
have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate?
The proposal will provide at least two garage parking stalls per home. Total off-street parking
stalls will be approximately I8ex4 stalls. The new public roadway will also have limited
parallel parking available on one side of the public street.
Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian,
bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicate whether public or private).
Yes, the proposal will add a new looped public roadway internally, accessing the development
from NE 12", Street. The new public ROW will include curb, landscaping strip, sidewalk, a
utility strip, and storm drainage. Half street improvements are required on both NE 12", Street
and NE Sunset Boulevard. ROW dedication will be needed along NE 12t1' Street to meet city
standards. Improvements to NE 121h Street and NE Sunset Boulevard will include curb,
landscaping strip, sidewalk, a utility strip, and storm drainage.
e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air
transportation? If so, generally describe.
No, the project will not.
How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal?
If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would
be trucks (such as commercial and nonpassenger vehicles). What data or transportation
models were used to make these estimates?
According to the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) prepared by TENW, 529 new weekday daily
trips are anticipated. Peak hour trips include 33 for AM Peak Hour, and 43 for PM Peak
hour. Trip generation estimates are based on data published by the Institute of Transportation
Engineers. Please refer to the associated TIA submitted with this checklist.
g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and
forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe.
No, the proposal will not interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural
and forest products on roads in the area.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
The project will be contributing transportation impact fees.
15. Public Services hI e
Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection,
police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe.
The proposed community will result in increased need for public service such as fire, health,
and police protection consistent with typical single-family developments. As a result of this, the
development will require the installation of additional fire hydrants per the Renton Regional
Fire Authority.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 13 of 16
Roads and dwellings will be constructed to meet all applicable standards and codes of the City
and IRCIRSEC. The proposed development will contribute to the local tax base and provide
additional tax revenue for the various public services. Tize project will be contributing to fire
district impacts fees.
16. Utilities lbqlo
a. Circle utilities currentlX available at the site:
(electricity] natural gas water refuse service, telephone, sanita sewer septic system,
other
Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service,
and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might
be needed.
Electricity/Gas: Puget Sound Energy
Water: City of Renton
Sanitary Sewer: City of Renton
Refuse: Waste Management
C. Signature HELP
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the
lead agency is relying on them to make its decision.
Signature:
Name of signee 1�gGtX e
Position and Agency/Organization AUj a Ae
Date Submitted:
D. Supplemental sheet for nonproject actions HELP
(IT IS NOT NECESSARY to use this sheet for project actions)
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction
with the list of the elements of the environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of
activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or
at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in
general terms.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; pro-
duction, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise?
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197.11-960) July 2016 Page 14 of 16
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life?
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are:
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are:
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or
areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection, such as parks,
wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or
cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands?
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are:
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it
would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans?
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public
services and utilities?
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 15 of 16
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are:
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or
requirements for the protection of the environment.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 16 of 16