HomeMy WebLinkAboutschmidt code appeal CITY OF RENTON
Code Case No: CODE17-000372 JUL 3 � 2017 � �
��;L� Date: July 20,2017
Violation Address: Total Amount Due: $500.00
505 Williams Ave N RECEIVED
Renton,WA 98057-5452 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
NOTICE OF RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE VIOLATION
The City has elected to establish a non-judicial hearing and determination system to enforce Renton Municipal Codes(RMC) civil code
violations.Therefore a code violation penalty, consistent with RMC 1-3�2.P is imposed, not including any costs, fees or assessments.
You may respond in the following manner:
�deny creating, permitting to exist, maintaining or failing to eliminate the violation(s)and I am requesting a hearing to contest this
/ �Finding of Violation.Appeal requests must be received by the Renton City Clerk's office within 10 days of the date of this Finding of
Vialation. Please send me a hearing date. I promise to appear on that date.The administrator must prove by a preponderance of the
evidence that i committed the violation. I understand that under RMC 1-3-2.G that the administrator shall decide whether the
opportunity to be heard will be on�y in writing or in person, or both.The city is not required to call witnesses to testify at the hearing.
Pursuant to RMC 1-3-2.K,failure to attend the scheduled hearing makes the Finding of Violation final, and I may be subject to
additional costs if I fail to withdraw or resolve my appeal prior to the hearing date. I a�so understand that the city has not waived any
rights�r remedies under the law.
Appeals should be mailed to: City of Renton Attention:
City Clerk
1055 S Grady Way
Renton,WA 98057
❑ I admit that I have created, permitted to exist, maintained or failed to eliminate the violation(s)and do not need or want any kind of
hearing.As a result, I have enclosed a check or money order(do not send cash) in the amount of$ . I understand I am
required to bring the property into compliance with City of Renton Municipal Code. I also understand that if compliance is not
achieved I may be issued additional Findings of Violation with increasing penalties, and or criminally prosecuted. NSF checks will be
treated as failure to respond.
Payment should be made to: City of Renton Attention:
1st Floor Finance
1055 S Grady Way
Renton,WA 98057
Complete inf tion below: (PLEASE PRINT
Name: �� /I� � �
C'_ � / /
Street or P.O. Box: � ���Z�— �/_ � �y �d�C�
City: �/� State: `�� Zi ��� S �j
p�—
Telephone: Home: Work:
Signat e of Viola or: Date:
� i
3/�-j �
=��
Page 3 of 3
1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98057 • rentonwa.gov
CITY OF RENTON
JUL 31 201�
Law Office of Gerald F. Robison RECEIVED
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
Attorney at Law
64g S. I SZnd� #7
Burien, WA 98148
(206) 243-4219
Fax: (888) 205-0071
July 31, 2017
Code Compliance
Department of Community&Economic Development
City of Renton
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98057
Re: Code Case No. CODE17-000372
Richard&Ping Schmidt
Address of Alleged Violation: 505 Williams Ave N, Renton, WA 98057
I represent Richard&Ping Schmidt with respect to the violation alleged in the above referenced
case and the Finding of Violation dated July 20, 2017. This letter provides a brief explanation of
the basis for the attached notice of appeal of the Finding of Violation.
First,your Finding assumes that the garages are being rented separately to a contractor. The
property is in fact rented as a whole to a group of unrelated adults who share the property,
including the house, garage and land. The"contractor"you refer to is one of the tenants renting
the house. His use of the garage is incidental and accessory to his tenancy in the house.
Second, a plain reading of your interpretation of Code Section 4-2-60 M, would make it illegal
for any person living in any residential zone in the City to store anything on their property, either
inside or outside. That is clearly an absurd interpretation of the Code. Such an absurd result is
avoided by Code Section 4-2-60 Q,which provides that accessory uses are permitted in all zones
per RMC 4-2-50. RMC 4-2-50 A, provides that accessory uses include uses "customarily
incidental and subordinate to the principal use and located upon the same lot" as the principal
use. Use of a garage for storage is well established as a use that is customarily incidental and
subordinate to use of a house. A tenant in the house has the same right to use the garage for
storage that an owner living in his own home would have. There is no violation in this case.
���?��l-1� .��____----
Gerald F. Robison