HomeMy WebLinkAbout01_pre app notes 7.31.14w:\2014\14.14024.00 faa rlp ‐ renton wa\j‐deliverables\j1‐issued\2015‐03‐13 sepa final review\from
unico\pre‐app meeting summary and waiver form\pre app notes 7.31.14.doc
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: July 31, 2014
TO: Pre‐Application File No. 14‐000942
FROM: Rocale Timmons, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: FAA – 1601 Lind Ave SW
General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre‐application for the above‐
referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting
issues are based on the pre‐application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant
and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information
contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official
decision‐makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Community & Economic Development Administrator,
Public Works Administrator, Planning Director, Development Services Director, and City
Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other
design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to
review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are
available for purchase for $50.00 plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall
or online at www.rentonwa.gov
Project Proposal: The subject property is located on the south side of SW 16th Street, between
Lind Ave SW and Raymond Ave SW, at 1601 SW 16th Street. The project site totals 8.80 acres in
area and is zoned Commercial Office (CO). The site currently contains an existing 6,050 square
foot day care center and a 197,804 square foot structure used as office space for the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA). The pre‐application packet indicates that the proposal is to
construct a five story office addition (approximately 95,000 square feet) totaling approximately
300,000 square feet of FAA office space with the retention of the existing office facility. The
proposal includes the demolition of the existing day care facility; construction of a single story
employee/visitor pavilion; construction of a three story parking garage (approximately 625
parking stalls); reconfiguration of the existing surface parking lot (approximately 570 parking
stalls); and associated infrastructure improvements.
Current Use: The site currently contains an existing 6,050 square foot day care center and a
197,804 square foot structure used as office space for the FAA.
Development Standards: The project would be subject to RMC 4‐2‐120B, “Development
Standards for Residential Zoning Classifications” effective at the time of complete application
(noted as “CO standards” herein).
Zoning: The property is located within the Commercial Corridor (CC) land use designation and
the Commercial Office (CO) zoning classification. A wide range of office uses are outright
FAA‐ 1601 Lind Ave SW
Page 2 of 5
July 31, 2014
w:\2014\14.14024.00 faa rlp ‐ renton wa\j‐deliverables\j1‐issued\2015‐03‐13 sepa final review\from
unico\pre‐app meeting summary and waiver form\pre app notes 7.31.14.doc
allowed within the CO zoning classification. Other Governmental Offices and facilities are
permitted with a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit in the CO zone. The proposed
expansion would necessitate a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit.
The City’s zoning use table has been provided to the applicant to verify which specific uses are
permitted on site.
Development Standards: The project would be subject to RMC 4‐2‐120B, “Development
Standards for Commercial Zoning Designations” effective at the time of complete application
(noted as “CO standards” herein).
Lot Coverage – The CO zone allows a maximum building coverage of 65 percent, or 75 percent if
parking is provided within a building or within an on‐site parking garage. Structural footprints
were not included in the submittal materials however the proposal appears to comply with the
lot coverage requirements of the zone. The applicant would be required, at the time of formal
land use application, to provide a lot coverage analysis.
Setbacks – Setbacks are the distance between the building and the property line or any private
access easement. The minimum required front yard and side yard along‐a‐street setbacks in the
CO zone are: 15 feet if the proposed building is less than 25 feet in height; 20 feet if the
proposed building is 25‐80 feet in height; and 30 feet if the proposed building is over 80 feet in
height. There are no rear or interior side yard setbacks. It appears the proposal complies with
the setback requirements of the zone.
Gross Floor Area – There is no minimum requirements for gross floor area within the CO zone.
Building Height – The maximum building height allowed in the CO zone is 250 feet. The
applicant did not provide detailed elevations with the pre‐app submittals therefore compliance
with the height requirements could not be confirmed. However, it is likely the proposal
complies with the height requirements of the zone.
Screening – Screening must be provided for all surface‐mounted and roof top utility and
mechanical equipment. The site plan application will need to include elevations and details for
the proposed methods of screening.
Refuse and Recycling Areas – Refuse and recycling areas need to meet the requirements of RMC
4‐4‐090, “Refuse and Recyclables Standards” (enclosed). Refuse and recycling areas need to
meet the requirements of RMC 4‐4‐090, “Refuse and Recyclables Standards” (enclosed). For
office developments a minimum of 2 square feet per every 1,000 square feet of building gross
floor area shall be provided for recyclable deposit areas and a minimum of 4 square feet per
1,000 square feet of building gross floor area shall be provided for refuse deposit areas.
Landscaping – All portions of the development area not covered by structures, required parking,
access, circulation or service areas, must be landscaped with native, drought‐resistant
vegetative cover. The minimum on‐site landscape width required along street frontages is 10
feet, except where reduced through the site plan development review process.
Please refer to landscape regulations (RMC 4‐4‐070) for additional general and specific
landscape requirements (enclosed). A conceptual landscape plan and landscape analysis
meeting the requirements in RMC 4‐8‐120D.12, shall be submitted at the time of application
for Site Plan Review.
FAA‐ 1601 Lind Ave SW
Page 3 of 5
July 31, 2014
w:\2014\14.14024.00 faa rlp ‐ renton wa\j‐deliverables\j1‐issued\2015‐03‐13 sepa final review\from
unico\pre‐app meeting summary and waiver form\pre app notes 7.31.14.doc
Tree Preservation – A tree inventory and a tree retention plan along with a tree retention
worksheet shall be provided with the formal land use application. The tree retention plan must
show preservation of at least 10 percent (10 %) of significant trees, and indicate how proposed
building footprints would be sited to accommodate preservation of significant trees that would
be retained. If the trees cannot be retained, they may be replaced with minimum 2 inch caliper
trees at a rate of six to one.
Fences – If the applicant intends to install any fences as part of this project, the location must be
designated on the landscape plan. A fence detail should also be included on the plan as well.
Parking – The following ratios would be applicable to the site:
Use Square Footage of Use Ratio Required Spaces
Office 300,000 SF Min: 2 spaces / 1,000 SF
Max: 4.5 spaces / 1,000 SF
Min: 600
Max: 1,350
The applicant is proposing a total of 1,195 parking stalls which appears to comply with
parking requirements. However, information regarding the net square footage of the
structure was not provided therefore the numbers provided for required spaces could not be
determined. Net square footage is the total of all floor area of a building, excluding stairwells,
elevator shafts, mechanical equipment rooms, interior vehicular parking or loading, and all
floors below the ground floor, except when used for human habitation or service to the public.
Where practical difficulties exist in meeting parking requirements, the applicant may request a
modification from these standards. The applicant will be required at the time of formal land use
application to provide detailed parking information (i.e. stall and drive aisle dimensions) and
calculations of the subject site and the overall campus use.
It should be noted that the parking regulations specify standard stall dimensions. Surface
parking stalls must be a minimum of 9 feet x 20 feet, compact dimensions of 8½ feet x 16 feet,
and parallel stall dimensions of 9 feet x 23 feet; compact surface parking spaces shall not
account for more than 30 percent of the spaces in the surface parking lots.
Structured parking stalls must be a minimum of 8¼ feet x 15 feet; a stall that has greater than a
45 degree angle must be 8¼ feet x 16 feet. Structured compact stalls must have dimensions of
7½ feet x 12 feet; a stall with greater than a 45 degree angle must be 7½ feet x 13 feet.
Compact structured parking spaces shall not account for more than 50 percent of the spaces in
the structured parking areas. Structured parallel stall dimensions have a minimum of 9 feet x 23
feet also.
ADA accessible stalls must be a minimum of 8 feet in width by 20 feet in length, with an adjacent
access aisle of 8 feet in width for van accessible spaces. The appropriate amount of ADA
accessible stalls based on the total number of spaces must be provided.
Surface parking lots with more than 100 stalls shall provide a minimum of 35 square feet of
landscaping per parking space. The site plan provided in the pre‐application packet did not
include landscaping square footages, therefore staff was unable to verify whether the
proposed project would with landscaping requirements for surface parking lots.
Please refer to landscape regulations (RMC 4‐4‐070 and RMC 4‐4‐080F.7) for further general and
specific landscape requirements (enclosed). The applicant will be required at the time of land
use application to provide a landscaping analysis of the subject site.
FAA‐ 1601 Lind Ave SW
Page 4 of 5
July 31, 2014
w:\2014\14.14024.00 faa rlp ‐ renton wa\j‐deliverables\j1‐issued\2015‐03‐13 sepa final review\from
unico\pre‐app meeting summary and waiver form\pre app notes 7.31.14.doc
Additionally, the proposal would need to be revised in order to provide bicycle parking based
on 10 % of the required number of parking stalls.
Pedestrian Access – A pedestrian connection shall be provided from all public entrances to the
street, in order to provide direct, clear and separate pedestrian walks from sidewalks to building
entries and internally from buildings to abutting properties.
Building Design Standards – The proposal is not located within or Design District and is not
required to comply with specific design standards. However, the applicant should be aware
the reviewing official does have discretion with respect to the design of the structure through
the Site Plan Review Criteria (see below).
Critical Areas
While the site is not mapped in a Flood Hazard Area according to the adopted 1995 FIRM
(including the Cedar River LOMR) the site is mapped in a Flood Hazard Area according to FEMA’s
DFIRM map. Requirements on all projects located within the City, including BFE (Finished Floor
Elevation) and Compensatory Storage requirements are based on the adopted 1995 FIRM
(including the Cedar River LOMR) map. However, please note depending upon FEMA’s future
determinations a higher BFE, than those noted in the 1995 FIRM, may be required in order to
obtain flood insurance in the future.
The applicant will be required to provide Flood Hazard data in their SEPA check list and
identify their intent to either use the 1995 FIRM or the DFIRM for Finished Floor Elevation and
Compensatory storage requirements.
The site is also located in an area of susceptibility to liquefaction during seismic events. Due to
subsurface conditions, a geotechnical report would be required to be submitted with the formal
land use application.
Environmental Review
Environmental (SEPA) Review is required due to the scope of the project. Therefore, an
environmental checklist is a submittal requirement. An environmental determination will be
made by the Renton Environmental Review Committee. This determination is subject to appeal
by either the project proponent, by a citizen of the community, or another entity having
standing for an appeal.
Permit Requirements
The proposal would require Hearing Examiner Site Plan Review as the project would exceed two
separate thresholds: the proposal is more 25,000 square feet of gross floor area (nonresidential)
in the CO zone outside the Employment Area Valley (EAV) land use designation; and the
proposal exceeds to 300 parking stall threshold. The proposal would also be required to apply
for Environmental (SEPA) Review, Hearing Examiner Conditional Use permit, and a potential
parking modification.
The purpose of the Site Plan process is the detailed arrangement of project elements so as to be
compatible with the physical characteristics of a site and with the surrounding area. An
additional purpose of Site Plan is to ensure quality development consistent with City goals and
policies General review criteria includes the following:
FAA‐ 1601 Lind Ave SW
Page 5 of 5
July 31, 2014
w:\2014\14.14024.00 faa rlp ‐ renton wa\j‐deliverables\j1‐issued\2015‐03‐13 sepa final review\from
unico\pre‐app meeting summary and waiver form\pre app notes 7.31.14.doc
a. Compliance and Consistency. Conformance with plans, policies, regulations and
approvals, including:
b. Off‐Site Impacts. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses.
c. On‐Site Impacts. Mitigation of impacts to the site
d. Access and Circulation. Safe and efficient access and circulation for all users.
e. Open Space. Incorporation of public and private open spaces to serve as distinctive
project focal points and to provide adequate areas for passive and active recreation by
the occupants/users of the site;
f. Views and Public Access. Provision of view corridors to shorelines and Mt. Rainier,
incorporates public access to shorelines, and arranges project elements to protect
existing natural systems where applicable.
g. Services and Infrastructure. Availability of public services and facilities to
accommodate the proposed use;
h. Signage. Use of signs primarily for the purpose of identification and management of
sign elements – such as the number, size, brightness, lighting intensity, and location –
to complement the visual character of the surrounding area, avoid visual clutter and
distraction, and appear in proportion to the building and site to which they pertain; and
i. Phasing. Inclusion of a detailed sequencing plan with development phases and
estimated time frames, if applicable.
All applications can be reviewed concurrently in an estimated time frame of 12 weeks once a
complete application is accepted. The Hearing Examiner Site Plan Review application fee is
$2,000, the Conditional Use Permit is $2,000, and the application fee for SEPA review is $1,000.
The fee for modifications is $100 each. There is an additional 3% technology fee at the time of
land use application. Detailed information regarding the land use application submittal is
provided in the attached handouts.
In addition to the required land use permits, separate construction, building and sign permits
would be required. The review of these permits may occur concurrently with the review of
the land use permits, but cannot be issued prior to the completion of any appeal periods.
Impact Mitigation Fees: In addition to the applicable building and construction fees, the
following impact fees would be required prior to the issuance of building permits:
A Fire Mitigation fee currently assessed at $0.14 per square foot of office space.
A Transportation Mitigation Fee As determined by City per current ITE Manual.
Fees will change January 1, 2014. A handout listing all of the City’s Development related fees is
attached for your review.
Expiration: Upon approval, the site plan and conditional use permit approval is valid for two
years with a possible two‐year extension.