Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutC_Comment_Response_Letter_20220714_v2 CORPORATE OFFICE (253) 984-2900 beylerconsulting.com 5920 100th St. SW, Suite 25 Lakewood, WA 98499 ENGINEERING + SURVEYING LAND SURVEYING | CIVIL ENGINEERING | STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING | PLANNING & FEASIBILITY STUDIES PROJECT MANAGEMENT | PERMITTING SERVICES | CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT September 6, 2022 Andrew Van Gordon Associate Planner 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 RE: 18.00392, Castro Short Plat, LUA22-000053 King County Parcel No. 0739000085 Mr. Van Gordon, The purpose of this letter is to address the review comments dated March 14th, 2022 for the proposed Castro Short Plat. To expedite your review and approval of the subject plans, below are our responses in bold, with your comments included herein for reference: Planning Division, Andrew Van Gordon 1. The proposed tree retention information does not match across the various documents. The short plat drawings, Landscape Planting & Tree Replacement Plan, and civil drawings all show differing tree retention information. Response: Tree retention plan now consistent across all plan sets. 2. Tract B is shown as 20 feet wide on the short plat drawings. The civil drawings show a 25-foot wide access easement. Please reduce the access easement to 20 feet. Response: Civil Plans now show 20’ wide access easement consistent with survey drawing. 3. Ten feet of on site landscaping is required along all public street frontages expect for areas for required walkways and driveways. A ten foot on site landscaping area is required on all lots and Tract A along the proposed public right of way and SE 176th St. Response: Ten foot landscaping now shown on properties adjacent to public right of way. 4. There shall be a minimum three foot landscaped setback at the base of retaining walls abutting public rights of way. Terraced created between retaining walls shall be permanently landscaped with a mixture of shrubs and groundcover (trees are optional) in conformance with the standards of RMC 4-4-070 Landscaping. For land that is not between two retaining walls (i.e., not a terrace) the lower soil grade (i.e., ground at the bottom of a retaining walls exposed surface) and the upper 20.00100 l Trihn City of SeaTac Response Letter l 03.08.2022 Page 2 of 3 soil grade (i.e., ground at the top of a retaining wall) equaling one foot for every one foot in height if the retaining wall. Response: 3’ Landscape now shown at the base of walls. 10’ easement now shown for walls for leveling a horizontal distance equal to the height of the wall. 5. Protected trees that do not contribute to a lots required minimum tree density shall be held in perpetuity within a tree protection tract. A minimum of two significant trees are required on each lot. Any protected trees in excess of the two are required to be in a tree protection tract pursuant to RMC 4-4-130H.2. Response: Understood. See Tree Tract ‘A’. 6. The grade level around any tree to be retained may not be lowered within the greater of the following areas: (i) the area defined by the drip line of the tree, or (ii) an area around the tree equal to one and one-half feet (1-1/2’) in diameter for each one inch of tree caliper. A larger tree protection zone based on tree size, species, soil, or other conditions may be required. Please identify how this requirement is being met. Response: See attached landscape and civil plans for tree protection. Civil Engineering, Nathan Janders 7. A water and sewer availability from Soos Creek Water and Sewer district should be provided. Response: Water and sewer availability from Soos Creek Water and Sewer district will be provided. 8. In the TIR a flow control facility exemption is claimed per section 1.2.3.1.B of the RSWDM due to an increase of less than 0.15 CFS. However the modeling used to support the exemption did not model the target areas, for which permeable pavement and limited infiltration BMPs are proposed, in accordance with table 1.2.9.A of RSWDM. The table indicated how to model the developed condition for which a BMP is applied to target surface (such as 50% impervious and 50% grass for permeable pavement) ,however the modeling needs to be revised to demonstrate compliance with section 1.2.9.A. • Note, applicant should verify potential run-on as modeling credits are not given for surfaces that run-on to permeable pavements. • Note, if a detention facility is determined to be required than a type 4 downstream drainage problem shall be evaluated in the downstream analysis. Response: TIR outlines how proposed BMPs will meet the flow control standard of matching pre-developed flows from 50% of the 2-year flow to the full 50 year flow. No exemptions are claimed. 9. The proposed plan depicts the modified street frontage along SE Petrovitsky Road listed in the pre application meeting. Application shall include a modification request as a part of the land use application. Response: The Modification Request justification is attached for your review. 10. Dedication of a 25 foot radius at the southwest corner of Tract A will be required. Response: 25’ radius at southwest corner of Tract A is shown on plans. 20.00100 l Trihn City of SeaTac Response Letter l 03.08.2022 Page 3 of 3 11. Application should demonstrate how the future half road along the western property line will be able to be built out in full with particular attention to the grading along the west side of the roadway. Response: A 16’ easement is now proposed along the western edge of the road. This easement provides space for a 2:1 fill slope to be constructed that will meet grade in the neighboring property. This fill can be utilized if other half of road is improved. 12. The application should verify with geotechnical engineer the stability of fill soils when saturated (see section C.2.7 Permeable pavement infeasibility criteria list no. 7). Response: Geotech will verify saturated soil stability before construction. If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact me at (253) 984-2900 or cwashington@beylerconsulting.com. Respectfully, Camille Washington Beyler Consulting, LLC