Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA82-013
VICINITY MAP x m 0 z N,$ oN > s ii, is I tt ,..\ f I 1 1 + 69-0{ 111 •9-01 99-01 99-01 ' ‘, — �1-� L9-01 r'9G-01 . 1'p . — N i 7 1 ul M .7, �N a % • I t a' - �' 'Tp I -, 1 44 Lj �a r 1 i0i p4a W , s ® Q 99-0{1 zj > ' 9: R O 4. II C9-r 1w H I I u 1 p9-ti I L1 r— il I ti\ 1 J i i l l r.. & ` 1."-i- . % In Ilk _■�1 CITY OF RENTON 4—J 1. M -[ 11W [3 1111 _as%_; �2 AYAA 1LOdFJIV F EB 1 91� BU«DlNG/Z0N1NG DEPT. ..,' .g:,.:1 , Ii 1 ri , ,i„ 1 . 1 . I i I } , j1 .. 1 ' , I 11 I ,, 11 , ., ';t: �}[II I '1 ! Il '!l1i1;l, . i l;ii I I' �I 11.. ,;Iii. , I ,; I , } I i ; };iil}i1�ji iii {,�. _.. :i. :j, I I. iC►'1 . 1 i ;; ' l;i , li 11i :ll !It. 1 lil: i 1i 11,. .1 ��l�!11� � ;'; ' i ►, '�,,;, $• I ' ' ' l' 1 ' i 11 ' i 1 t, ! III If1 ' !1. ' I ! : }l', ';!1`.' �'-' Ili : , + • ifi i1 : Li!!!!:!!: 1i � 1i+ � i il' Il, l.!' I ,i .l !' i , ! ,ji 1 1,. 11 I ! Ili i 1 1i' ' , I' . , . 1 , iili I 1 .ill , III . . . 1 i. . i+ : ; . � � •+ ' ljl , ill; ' r ' 1 i;1' i �il }++ • • , ' ! ' }�� I ; ,i• illl! �li;lli.iii' I► l;i11�1'•i 1 1 .0 ." I! ' ► it �': : Ii '1 �! I } }i 1l1 1I1f1l� I ill } 1 Ia �4, f1. 1 ;' i 1! I1! 1I �_I . • _ + I1i1 } n 1 } ' ►ji1111 '� fiiil �: i, ,, flll } 1,1 I • I I . ;, r } 1 i •1 : I1 11 . :1; +il . ' !�i,i'j}' '' i li !li' 1 1! �,3 ! . ' .: � 1; 11 ! ' ! 1 ! } ! ! 1 , } .E' i i ' l i'mir 1} 1 1 l i ■ }'�' I t i j . ! 11 i 1 ► 11t� i • Ii!�! 1 7.-1 . 11I I 'wl 11_ I, I !,} / 1111}1 I I • . 1 1 I , Wild`.--• sgem ug::::::14. 1112En. ea+e1.. gt:1e.ru. ; 1 . . .. III I}' :� ;ii I } • Ii ' ..i !5 I" .u.uudi..:' RII I:':.:::� �'.:Iellmow ' i . 1 . �_.'i •i 1 , } } I ; i � I i I i ® most s urw w V ae+w..rN�x.lf M2 oiri �. I ; 11 : I . , I III} 1 � Irli } ; 1 '.1 ; } , • I1� i• 1 # I ! � � 1� f 1! j111 I. i i II i - '.gliewe, 1/4,,,.r . .11;15,- NI ., : , , :1 .1. 1 11 II i 1iI I }t M E1' }I 1 i1 l I Ij I• 'i I 111 ) i I , 1111 • i 1 1.1 ► 1 ii !1 ,;! :ih1 Ij I 1I 1 } . 1 1 ; : . !ILI fPki*Til'Itiii.ftv,,,,,,.. Iill , III �'"� il , . ! I{. 1 I 1 il ! i�t�a■.:rGi� a riium.,;; ! 1 '' i 1 ` t1l I �� - i; ; ice.- r,,r--' .>_fp- �. __. . IIII : : ; , 11III ' Ill I ;ti}1 • , I ‘ : 11.1IIM 1 i I !' � � 111 , 1I: 1:1 �1 1V1 !, +1111 ; 1I , � l 1 1� l � 1j1/1IIi. , IIi1 I 1 �, 111 1 f /- 1 i, 1 'il} ill } ! i " �� , 11};1111 } �41 �A 111I 1 ; I :f; ; }!I P ,I !}II j1 1 , I 1i` ! iI • i1 ;1 1!i111 �• 1 } 1'j ! ! f Iljj' I i'i! } ! 1I1 1 ' I } i! 1 ► ; 1, ,, ,'i I Ij I ii •I I I • 1 • 1;11 !, ! II , i.: ',• i ill 1 II �! ,lil , �' i 1 1 • i � i I • r;. l j 1� 1i i Ti. 1 1166 i . l '\ i ti 1 1:. 1 . tr; . . ,` , : ,{I ', " I 11 1 t • ' 1 } } I+ � ' ,1 _ . , :. I I .I. ' 1 11 . •, 11;'11 111 i I1I I• � I1 ��� +' �� 1: 1 1 !:1 : � i ; II11 i 11 l . l i i1 �' i -� '� iI '�. r 1."1 .1il: i + f 11111 ' .1 1 1} It �+ 1 1 V;` I 1 1 , , ,i,111 it II' 11 , i i i !. . ! 1 11i I: 1 1 I 11 '1 I � �' IZ '� � n } �, . • 1 iII I : } i� ► } ;g! � 1` 1i : • ii'I I I: • 'jl 1 i • '��, : . 1,+:{1 ;: }�i. �II , Ne ��J D1; J 11 ll .ii 11 , 1 1.1 ,ii , 1 i i} 'I 1 1 , I; , I i I1 }, 1 !i 1 r • ' ( Ii I I; :i 11i • ; t1 ; 1 } i l S !� } 1itikiir, 1+ 111 1 l } (t . .V.1 ;: ' �:' j1 ';'• it ' 1!:+: `i .1I ;I1,!t 41 I1 I I II II1 11 }! I i, ' 1 I! fC't I l •1 i?cr t] t�'1C,\,f'`;.NI _ '.. • , •, ;I •�' • I 1 t ,1 1 i i 1'1 . I i{1 i+ 1• 1 1 I!1 i -.. •.•...i•t� p..,- * iy �•♦ a-Tr"t i rT rr'TY-1• •. r- � i ► , ;{: 1l�'1i1 (}{ • 1.1i I 1 i I , , , i , 11 , , ,, ,�i. , . ,�r1 II i ;, I II!TT'',!!!11 111 , 11r. >�i1 }t f. 1 J I 1 � 4 ! �:I I,I !, i 1 1� :i.I' f i 1 »....I..�.w...w.�.w.a.w.... ... ......r/01...1 1 I I i ;; . - 1 f, I 1 ; :'1; }._111 ;�i i I I 1�mllismisist�I1:Cli�ill,ntg��� et a•.i I , A` :!: . k ij i,Ii I•,: . 1 1, ' ,1� iil! ' , i,1II , : + 1 , '; II I '' ' ' Ilt1X AI III 1111 . 111 111 . 1i '1' i1i 1 1 I 11 , \4i Ii 11 1 y - 1 - :' 1 .,T, 1 : „ i, 11 ,1: . � III 1. IIi : 111, '111i11 ' 1 I r1 - I I' 1i ' ii1 •11 ' 11i1: ' 1 ' il I ' ., : : + i i : ,, ',, . ,-:. • , 1% 11 iii ; i : . , , � �...:.r, , 1! ' Ismi . 11;11 • 11 , Ii1 ►iii: 7;4f'; + ' � '� '1 i :i. ii.I 1 . 1 : , ,;; 1 i , 1.! : . . ...I- . , 1 : . . .i ; 111 .1 j . 1 :H : ! , ,. I • 11 : (. . . ,II. . 111 . .. 11 ii:. 'ii : 1� : , i , l IIi 1. , :, r i ' i ' i, i ; I; • . 'l:� lii . , 1 1 ,+ 111�.•-�, II , il '. 1 J ; ii!11; : 1 , : . 1 : :i 11 iI ' ' ; ;;: ::lI: ,: ;; _ 1O' 1 `/Zf' ( 7Yn) .._..:.. . . • :E I + . VI N FSU�°PcSATS :' 'S' . 03/ '' —C. 4(T sip) ! ' • • • r _:_psi.- — } ! _ .. __....... t ._..._... .1t .—_... .._ : f {{ 1 , _ . ; H111i4 � S • }� ;j3 . , . 1 �... i . . _.. ..... . . .I .._.K. i , • • 1 _ - • • 1/4 • !S j; `r ti r I ; •• .7 sil. • • !.• — ii i • . t...-- .—.— i . _. '--' - ..1 .... — -I ._._......... _,.....;'° ; �� rLi�•e'r . �: :. --'-�-'. 1....__._ •..1‘ . ' _�.. -��r�61 -----> .-�t'•1-.i • \-: xi,s.: R 1NF `rl r,E.J� .�.��� NE.W.' F a . 1i '� -' � REIN• F .. • r.IF`F'ENfR .. .. - _ v. :- , 1 • . - , t ' II ' • • I . • . •• 41,...r.," ,i f-, i,..=.0. Al. t,,..,; a •,- • --w,... • •.t. ,,,,, :,.. '',.), 1, .i...,,,• % ,e• , .- t4C,-,--,,P -.........,...i. "•-t..,,,,...,,,,,..: P., -42, ,,,-. ,,.1,4:f. ,.'-' ''''':',,.. '''''' •'''' '. . l'; T. 4'1 V,' ,fi 'iVi'.• X ii,;.' . ,• :,,..r..01-,...,t • . . . • . . ' • . 1.....v . . • / 1'. •J, ..-- ,,,-',. .*2.,. . ,..1.• . " • . . - FILE ar/TEE s n .... 0 13 „„„.,,,,,, •. • • , , 41 • . . .. _ • .. . . ' . . • ..,.. , !•,• ..„.,—, .,. .. ,.., • „..,. ,„ F. .,...., ,..., . y ,... r.-i- lk ,, ;R. of:. - 1,-.. • •4••,... ;12 .•e• . . .t.... ...,.. . ,,,, .,•ir- : .,,,,...---1.,..,. ,,... f4....... "."' ?,.., rr 'Ifi• V" il.i; ' q., •Li=::,.. 7',,••:..,,..,..i Ai "i',..,A.• -,•1;-.., . ..:7 • ' A,..,' , fi is; -4 •• h...;!,.. ••*,-. ..e =..g: i .41 '"r` "gf•li,,,- P",ii".' 3. 4'..: 1„. .4, 1..7.• ,- '0,th-, „..., 1.4_4 . -......,...,,t, ii,„\-... ..,, . t.„.:",•,. v ,...„4,..,..„,_.• , h,. . --:-,, -..41,,,.- -,,,.... w,,,,, ,...,. •.:ft44.v -,,,,, -Aw,,,,,,, ,,,,,,;,,i. .. ..-: ,......„. -,,,,,,..-t, -—, , . . . . • . - I . . . . . • , . , . 1 - . • • . • . . . , . - . . . . . . . . . . • . . , ... .• . • • • . - . . . . . . , . . ,. . . . , .. . . . _ . . . . . ., . . ... . . . .• . , . . • • .. . .. .. . • • . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . .. . . . . . . . . ..•. . . . . . . . . . . . • .• . . . . . .. , .. -.. -. . . . . . . . .• . , : . . .. . . . • • • . . • " . . . . • . . ., . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . • . .- . . . - . . • •. . . . . .. . • . . . . . . . . . .. , . • . . • .• ., -.. .• -. . .. . . . . . . . • • .. . . . . . . . . • . . • . . . • . _ . . . . . . . • . • . . , . . . • • .. . . . . . ... . .„ .. .. . . . . . • . . . •• . . . . . . • . . . .„ ... .. . . . .. . . . . .. .• , .. .. . " . .. •• . . ,. . • . . .• .. • . . . . . . , - • . . . . . • . . ... . , . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . • . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . ... „ . . . .. .. • . . . . . . . . . • • .. . . .. . . . • . ... . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . .. _. . , . - . . • . • . • . • . , , . . . .- _- - : • . . . . • . . . . . - . . , , . ... , .. . . . . . . . , .. .. _ ... . . . . . . . . . . .. - • . . •. - - -•• • . ..... . ...•. . . . . , . . . . . . . . . ,. . . . . . . . . .. 0 0 • • • • ' ' �0 y CITY cc DENTON • .. j f Vag .' ,� —� ' a 3 : �'.o IJ. .l5 �. ; 0 }; „..:$ • � : E:E B 1: •9..198.2.. , ! • a. ; . • Btd'_.DING/ZONINC:DEPT ''' ` u<< • . - D T ink - :-.:,'• .-- ' - ':: 1 ' .1 '— r • }-.:... -.-DE TAll:. • • • `t ,ti • h ter---- N t.W .F.II. i/8 u-x a ' R E i N 4 4r' 4p ' ri.FFE Pi',eR ( {y).. .E.A.i. o , '`- I• -.: --1L'1\ 5'r, •: 4- En/C...E' .• SE L. • 1 i ' •• • - i , • • • �\, / �r it -• El/5 T A$ffiL'r ..- }. ..-1 : ' . .. .. , ''' " _ .: {:- -r PA II.NG i. • ... , , .,•:, . q`_' ----- _ - . - - .. - Y _ - '. v :i..:?`��5� R -c- Yam•- o �� t... .�:_4_ ,. ..; ,o f k /•; ..,: : FXIS?:4 :C.ONC. •FC3o 'IR(C, . • ' • . y}4Ic t� 39 -t8 v�.t.i� �.,.S4C' 'E..iC. e- �� T,or�s.: iA . ' :.y ?•1 c- 2.G. 1 \dAs is. . i:.,/-,..ST:.2Et,.crt.".,CaW.c.T t4 - s,$" REVISION• • • BY • • . . . APPRO ED r GATE.- �SfM, dtEVIs10 • CITY OF RENTON March 31 , 1982 APR — 1 1982 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER IJIVAIVC;4; iWcl`Jr DEPT. CITY OF RENTON ;;/ REPORT AND DECISION , APPLICANT: Boeing Commercial Airplane Company FILE NO. SA-013-82 LOCATION: Apron "A", east side of Renton Municipal Airport and adjacent to the Cedar River bridge. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant requests site approval to install an 11-foot high, 300-foot long blast fence at an existing test position and to extend existing air and electrical utilities. , SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building & Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions . Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval of conditional use permit. BUILDING & ZONING- The Building & Zoning Department preliminary report was DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on March 24, 1982. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building & Zoning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on March 30, 1982 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The Examiner noted that the application should have been processed under the Conditional Use Permit provisions denoted in Section 4-710. I . i . (2) , specifically required for facilities which service and store airplanes. However, because public notice for the hearing had adequately described the request, he felt that satisfaction of the legal publication requirements had been met. Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator, presented the Building & Zoning Department staff report, and entered the following exhibits into the record: Exhibit #1 : Application File containing Building & Zoning Department report and other pertinent documents Exhibit #2: Site Plan of Apron "A" showing proposal Mr. Blaylock reviewed the conditional use permit criteria denoted in Section 4-722(F) of the Zoning Code, advising that the subject request meets applicable code requirements for -approval of a permit. He also indicated that noise will most likely be reduced by the proposal due to the current manufacture of quieter planes proposed for testing on the site. Responding to the Examiner's inquiry regarding provision of additional landcape screening along the Cedar River, Mr. Blaylock stated that because public access is not allowed along the western bank of the river, landscaping has not been necessary or required in the past. However, if such a proposal is desired in the future, it would be appropriate for the Boeing Company to landscape the entire bank at one time. The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: Hannah Kimball Boeing Commercial Airplane Company P.O. Box 3707, M.S. 62-15 Seattle, WA 98124 Ms. Kimball concurred in the recommendations contained in the staff report. She described the proposal to allow turning movement of the airplane 90 degrees to facilitate testing in a different direction; and reiterated Mr. Blaylock's comments regarding decrease in noise due to modifications in later airplane models. The Examiner requested further comments. Since none were offered, the hearing regarding File No. SA-013-82 was closed by the Examiner at 9:23 a.m. SA-013-82 Page Two FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1 . The applicant, Boeing Commercial Airplane Company, filed a request to construct additional jet engine test site blast fencing. 2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Building and Zoning Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #1 . 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton 's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , RCW 43.21C, as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) , responsible official . 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 6. The subject property is located on the east side of the Renton Municipal Airport at Apron "A" just north of the Cedar River bridge. 7. The site is flat and is currently used by the Boeing Company for the testing of jet engines. An existing blast fence is already located on the site. The current fence is oriented to the east and is used to deflect the exhaust of jet engines during testing procedures . 8. The applicant wants to be able to test engines in other than an east-west orientation and proposed to erect an additional 300 feet of fencing around the site along the north (100 feet) , northeast (60 feet) , and south (140 feet) perimeter. 9. The access road from the bridge across the Cedar River is located immediately south of the subject site and the fence would provide additional protection for users of the access road. 10. The additional fencing may provide limited noise reduction since additional portions of the site will be fenced but the main purpose remains the deflection of the exhaust from the engines. 11 . The site is within 200 feet of the Cedar River shoreline and is subject to a Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit. That permit has been approved by the city and no appeal has been filed on that action. 12. The subject site is zoned P-1 (Public/Quasi-Public) and the Comprehensive Plan and the Master Plan study for the airport both indicate that the site is suitable for airport related uses including the manufacturing and servicing of airplanes. 13. There will be no expansion of the facilities beyond the increase of the blast• fence. CONCLUSIONS: 1 . The subject proposal appears to serve the public use and interest. The site is zoned for public and quasi-public uses and Section 4-710(I) (i ) (2) permits the establishment of airport related functions at the Renton Municipal Airport. 2. The proposed use is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and the Master Plan study for the airport. It is also compatible with and has co-existed with the other airport related uses in the vicinity. 3. While the proposal will not add any new uses to the airport it may reduce noise levels of jet engine testing procedures because of the additional buffering provided by the three-fourths wrap-around detail of the additional blast fencing. 4. The proposal will not add to the traffic or parking problems of the airport, and no additional employment opportunities will be provided by the proposal . DECISION: The request is approved and a conditional use permit is granted. SA-013-82 Page Three ORDERED THIS 31st day of March, 1982. "66--99 Fred J. Ka an Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 31st day of March, 1982 by Affidavit of Mailing to the party of record: Hannah Kimball , Boeing Commercial Airplane Company, P.O. Box 3707, M.S. 62-15, Seattle, WA 98124 TRANSMITTED THIS 31st day of March, 1982 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director David Clemens, Policy Development Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ron Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before April 14, 1982. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be 'filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall , or same may be purchased, at cost in said department. F 0 o THE CITY OF RENTON %_ MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 o my ° BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 90 `O FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 0,9g6 7] SEP1M��P April 21 , 1982 Ms . Hannah Kimball Boeing Commercial Airplane Company P.O. Box 3707, M.S. 62-15 Seattle, WA 98124 RE: File No. SA-013-82; Boeing Commercial Airplane Company; Request for Site Approval . Dear Ms . Kimball : The Examiner's Report regarding the referenced application which was published on March 31 , 1982 has not been appealed within the 14-day period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is considered final and is being tramsitted to the Building & Zoning Department this date for filing. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, ""c‘.1),X01414÷^"•-••••• Fred J . Kaufman ® le 09�y0� �� Hearing Examiner ( 1,4V cc: Building & Zoning Department Apl IrgB Q QilvG/z -.1 @ENwir [j 4427 Yu APR - 11982 March 31 , 1982 CU .A; G;- 1\11 ,G DEPT. OFFICE OF THE LAND USE. HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION . APPLICANT: Boeing Commercial Airplane Company FILE NO. SA-013-82 LOCATION: Apron "A", east side of Renton Municipal Airport and adjacent to the Cedar River bridge. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant requests site approval to install an 11-foot high, 300-foot long blast fence at an existing test position and to extend existing air and electrical utilities. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building & Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval of conditional use permit. BUILDING& ZONING The Building & Zoning Department preliminary report was DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on March 24, 1982. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building & Zoning Department report, examining available information on file with the application,. and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on March 30, 1982 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The Examiner noted that the application should have been processed under the Conditional Use Permit provisions denoted in Section 4-710. I . i . (2) , specifically required for facilities which service and store airplanes. However, because public notice for the hearing had adequately described the request, he felt that satisfaction of the legal publication requirements had been met. Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator, presented the Building & Zoning Department staff report, and entered the following exhibits into the record: Exhibit #1 : Application File containing Building & Zoning Department report and other pertinent documents Exhibit #2: Site Plan of Apron "A" showing proposal Mr. Blaylock reviewed the conditional use permit criteria denoted in Section 4-722(F) of the Zoning Code, advising that the subject request meets applicable code requirements for approval of a permit. He also indicated that noise will most likely be reduced by the proposal due to the current manufacture of quieter planes proposed for testing on the site. Responding to the Examiner's inquiry regarding provision of additional landcape screening along the Cedar River, Mr. Blaylock stated that because public access is not allowed _ along the western bank of the river, landscaping has not been necessary or required in the past. However, if such a proposal is desired in the future, it would be appropriate for the Boeing Company to landscape the entire bank at one time. The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: Hannah Kimball Boeing Commercial Airplane Company P.O. Box 3707, M.S. 62-15` Seattle, WA 98124 . Ms. Kimball concurred in the recommendations contained in the staff report. She described the proposal to allow turning movement of the airplane 90 degrees to facilitate testing in a different direction; and reiterated Mr. Blaylock's comments regarding decrease in noise due to modifications in later airplane models. The Examiner requested further comments. Since none were offered, the hearing regarding File No. SA-013-82 was closed by the Examiner at 9:23 a.m. >I_ •-1 SA-013-82 Page Two' 4' FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1 . The applicant, Boeing Commercial Airplane Company, filed a request to construct additional jet engine test 'site blast fencing. 2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Building and Zoning Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #1 . 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton.'s 'Environmental Ordinance and the State 'Environmen.tal Policy Act of 1971 , RCW 43.21C, as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) ,' responsible official . 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. . 5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 6. The subject property is located on the east side of the Renton Municipal Airport at Apron 'AP just north of the Cedar River bridge. 7. The site is flat and is currently used by the Boeing Company for the testing of jet engines. An existing blast fence is already located on the site. The current fence is oriented to the east and is used to deflect the exhaust of jet engines during testing procedures . 8. The applicant wants to be able to test engines in other than an east-west orientation' and proposed to erect an additional 300 feet of fencing around the site along the north (100 feet) , northeast (60 feet) , and south (140 feet) perimeter. 9. The access road from the bridge across the Cedar River is located immediately south of the subject site and the fence would provide additional protection for users of the access road. 10. The additional fencing may provide limited noise reduction since additional portions of the site will be fenced but the main purpose remains the deflection of the exhaust from the engines. 11 . The site is within 200 feet of the Cedar River shoreline and is subject to a Shoreline Management Substantial .Development Permit. That permit has been approved by the city and no appeal has been filed on that action. l 12. The subject site is zoned P-1 (Public/Quasi-Public) and the Comprehensive Plan and the Master Plan study for the airport both indicate that the site is suitable for airport related uses including the manufacturing and servicing of airplanes. 13. There will_ be no expansion of the facilities beyond the increase of the blast fence. CONCLUSIONS: 1 . The subject proposal appears to serve the public use and interest. The site is zoned for public and quasi-public uses and Section 4-710(I) (i ) (2) permits the establishment of airport related functions at the Renton Municipal Airport. 2. The proposed use is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and the Master Plan study for the airport. It is also compatible with and has co-existed with the other airport related uses in the vicinity. 3. While the proposal will not add any new uses to the airport it may reduce noise levels of jet engine testing procedures because of the additional buffering provided by the three-fourths wrap-around detail of the additional blast fencing. 4. The proposal will not add to the traffic or parking problems of the airport, and no additional employment opportunities will be provided by the proposal. DECISION: ' The request is approved and a conditional use permit is granted. SA-013-82 Page Three ORDERED THIS 31st day of March, 1982. \/••004,-v--- Fred J. Ka an Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 31st day of March, 1982 by Affidavit of Mailing to the party of record: Hannah Kimball , Boeing Commercial Airplane Company, P.O. Box 3707, M.S. 62-15, Seattle, WA 98124 TRANSMITTED THIS 31st day of March, 1982 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Sh i npoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director David Clemens, Policy Development Director Members, Renton Planning Commission • Ron Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before April 14, 1982. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14). days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall , or same may be purchased at cost in said department. CITY 0F R6NlTON DMarch 31 , 1982 APR - 1 1982 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER .I.a� , .Ji\!tNG DEPT. CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION . APPLICANT: Boeing Commercial Airplane Company FILE NO. SA-013-82 LOCATION: Apron "A", east side of Renton Municipal Airport and adjacent to the Cedar River bridge. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant requests site approval to install an 11-foot high, 300-foot long blast fence at an existing test position and to extend existing air and electrical utilities. - SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building & Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval of conditional use permit. BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zonina Department preliminary report was DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on March 24, 1982. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building & Zoning Department report, examining available information on file with the application,. and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on March 30, 1982 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The Examiner noted that the application should have been processed under the Conditional Use Permit provisions denoted in Section 4-710. I . i . (2) , specifically required for facilities which service and store airplanes. However, because public notice for the hearing had adequately described the request , he felt that satisfaction of the legal publication requirements had been met. Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator, presented the Building & Zoning Department staff report, and entered the following exhibits into the record: Exhibit #1 : Application File containing Building & Zoning Department report and other pertinent documents Exhibit #2: Site Plan of Apron "A" showing proposal Mr. Blaylock reviewed the conditional use permit criteria denoted in Section 4-722(F) of the Zoning Code, advising that the subject request meets applicable code requirements for approval of a permit. He also indicated that noise will most likely be reduced by the proposal due to the current manufacture of quieter planes proposed for testing on the site. Responding to the Examiner's inquiry regarding provision of additional landcape screening along the Cedar River, Mr. Blaylock stated that because public access is not allowed along the western bank of the river, landscaping has not been necessary or required in the past. However, if such a proposal is desired in the future, it would be appropriate for the Boeing Company to landscape the entire bank at one time. The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: Hannah Kimball Boeing Commercial Airplane Company P.O. Box 3707, M.S. 62-15 Seattle, WA 98124 Ms. Kimball concurred in the recommendations contained in the staff report. She described the proposal to allow turning movement of the airplane 90 degrees to facilitate testing in a different direction; and reiterated Mr. Blaylock's comments regarding decrease in noise due to modifications in later airplane models. The Examiner requested further comments. Since none were offered, the hearing regarding File No. SA-013-82 was closed by the Examiner at 9:23 a.m. SA-013-82 Page Two FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1 . The applicant, Boeing Commercial Airplane Company, filed a request to construct additional jet engine test site blast fencing. 2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Building and Zoning Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #1 . 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , RCW 43.21C, as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) , responsible official . 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 6. The subject property is located on the east side of the Renton Municipal Airport at Apron "A" just north of the Cedar River bridge. 7. The site is flat and is currently used by the Boeing Company for the testing of jet engines. An existing blast fence is already located on the site. The current fence is oriented to the east and is used to deflect the exhaust of jet engines during testing procedures . 8. The applicant wants to be able to test engines in other than an east-west orientation and proposed to erect an additional 300 feet of fencing around the site along the north (100 feet) , northeast (60 feet) , and south (140 feet) perimeter. 9. The access road from the bridge across the Cedar River is located immediately south of the subject site and the fence would provide additional protection for users of the access road. 10. The additional fencing may provide limited noise reduction since additional portions of the site will be fenced but the main purpose remains the deflection of the exhaust from the engines. 11 . The site is within 200 feet of the Cedar River shoreline and is subject to a Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit. That permit has been approved by the city and no appeal has been filed on that action. 12. The subject site is zoned P-1 (Public/Quasi-Public) and the Comprehensive Plan and the Master Plan study for the airport both indicate that the site is suitable for airport related uses including the manufacturing and servicing of airplanes. 13. There will be no expansion of the facilities beyond the increase of the blast fence. CONCLUSIONS: 1 . The subject proposal appears to serve the public use and interest. The site is zoned for public and quasi-public uses and Section 4-710( I) (i ) (2) permits the establishment of airport related functions at the Renton Municipal Airport. 2. The proposed use is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and the Master Plan study for the airport. It is also compatible with and has co-existed with the other airport related uses in the vicinity. 3. While the proposal will not add any new uses to the airport it may reduce noise levels of jet engine testing procedures because of the additional buffering provided by the three-fourths wrap-around detail of the additional blast fencing. 4. The proposal will not add to the traffic or parking problems of the airport, and no additional employment opportunities will be provided by the proposal . DECISION: The request is approved and a conditional use permit is granted. SA-013-82 Page Three ORDERED THIS 31st day of March, 1982. "64--09 Fred J. Ka an Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 31st day of March, 1982 by Affidavit of Mailing to the party of record: Hannah Kimball , Boeing Commercial Airplane Company, P.O. Box 3707, M.S. 62-15, Seattle, WA 98124 TRANSMITTED THIS 31st day of March, 1982 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director David Clemens, Policy Development Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ron Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before April 14, 1982. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall , or same may be purchased at cost in said department. • CITY OF RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER • PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 30, 1982 AGENDA • COMMENCING AT 9 : 00 a.m. : COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The applications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. SA-013-82 BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE COMPANY SM-012-82 Application to install 300 L.F. additional blast fence at existing test position and extend existing air and electrical utilities; located at apron "A" , east side of Renton Municipal Airport, adjacent to S. Cedar River Bridge. , I UIEDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 30 , 1982 APPLICANT : BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE COMPANY FILE NUMBER : SA-013-82 A . SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST : The applicant requests site approval to install an 11-foot high 300-foot long blast fence at an existing test position and to extend existing air and electrical utilities . B . GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record : BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE COMPANY 2 . Applicant : BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE COMPANY 3 . Location : (Vicinity Map Attached ) Apron "A" , east side of Renton Municipal Airport and adjacent to Cedar River bridge. 4 . Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Building & Zoning Department . 5 . Size of Property : + . 87 acres . 6 . Access : Via East Perimeter Road . 7 . Existing Zoning : P-1 , Public Use District . 8 . Existing Zoning in the Area : P-1 ; H-1, Heavy Industry . 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Public/Quasi Public . 10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Daily Record Chronicle on March 15 , 1982 , and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance on March 19 , 1982 . C . IHII[STOR Y/„WCKGROUNI® : The subject site is part of the original plat of the City of Renton . PRELIMINARY REPOI TO THE HEARING EXAMINER - B'OEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE COMPANY MARCH 30 , 1982 PAGE TWO D . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography : The subject site is essentially level . 2 . Soils : Urban Land (Ur) is soil that has been modified by disturbance of the natural layers with additions of fill material several feet thick to accommodate large industrial and housing installations . The erosion hazard is slight to moderate. 3 . Vegetation : Most of the area is paved and very little natural vegetation remains . 4. Wildlife : What vegetation remains is not suitable for wildlife habitat . 5 . Water : No surface water was observed on the subject site, although the Cedar River is adjacent on the east . • 6 . Land Use : The subject site is presently used as a test facility for aircraft engines and associated equipment . Similar land uses and/or functions are found on the adjacent properties . E . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: This are of the Municipal Airport is occupied primarily by the Boeing Company and their 757 commercial airplane operation . F . fPUILLIE SERVICES: 1 . Water and Sewer : The Municipal Airport has numerous water and sewer lines crossing the subject site . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements . 3 . Transit : METRO Transit Route #107 operates along Park Avenue North within 1/2 mile to the east of • the subject site . . 4. Schools : Not applicable . 5 . Recreation : Not applicable . G . AIPPLICAwLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1 . Section 4-710 , Public Use District. 2 . Section 4-710-3 , Review of Nonmunicipal Improvements . H . APPLI(CAILE SECTIONS IDE THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR ®TINIER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1 . Policies Element , Comprehensive Plan (1981 ) , Industrial Policy , 6 .A . 3 . I . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT: 1 . Natural Systems : Minor . 2 . Population/Employment : Minor. 3 . Schools : Not applicable. . PRELIMINARY REPORT 1 THE HEARING EXAMINER BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANT COMPANY MARCH 30 , 1982 PAGE THREE 4 . Social : Not applicable. 5 . Traffic : Minor . J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C , a declaration of non-significance was issued for the subject proposal by the ERC on March 15, 1982 . K . AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 . City of Renton Building & Zoning Department . 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division . 3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division . 4. City of Renton Utilities Division . 5 . City of Renton Fire Department . 6 . City of Renton Parks Department . 7 . City of Renton Policy Development Department . L . DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . The proposed use. can be considered consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and rezoning designations of Public/Quasi-Public and P-1 , Public Use , respectively for the site and surrounding area . 2 . The proposal is compatible with the existing land uses on surrounding and adjacent properties . 3 . In this application the proponent is seeking to modify the Apron "A" Engine Test Position by constructing additional blast fence along the north and south sides of the site which is located just west and north of the access bridge . The fencing will be 11 feet high and consist of approximately 300 lineal feet in three sections designed as follows : a ) 140 ' along the southerly side b ) 60 ' along the northeasterly side c ) 100 ' along the northerly side . This project will supplement the existing 160 ' of fencing lying along the east perimeter of the site . It will also serve to enclose the area for safety purposes as have the other testing sites been . Such an enclosure should be sufficient for • public health and safety and is consistent with precautions taken in the past by the company in testing similar aircraft and related industrial equipment. 4 . A Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit is required because the additional fencing is located within 200 feet of the shoreline of the Cedar River . This has been applied for and is being processed under SM-012-82 . 5 . Utilities Engineering notes that a City water line is close to the proposed fencing. The applicant is advised to consult with this division prior to any construction activity . PRELIMINARY REPOI TO THE HEARING EXAMINER BOEING COMMERCIAL -IRPLANE COMPANY • MARCH 30, 1982 PAGE FOUR 6 . Once the fencing is installed, it should be painted with a similar color as existing fencing to be consistent with past construction. M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS : Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that this request be approved subject to : 1 . Processing and issuance of the Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit of L-4 . 2 . Consultation with the Utilities Engineering Division regarding the City water line of L-5 . 3 . Painting the fencing similar to that previously installed . F_4-_tf.. . i u ,., 1 x.sii-3 ,, . . B 0 .E ".:,:......,-,,.. -„,,.-- . , 1n/L., 1 `sue Y, A . <.k...,. „' ,,� k::f.P c' + 41,f . `i. ,r, • • • ; e-: �n. /� , . •:5. 'Vi� t�'.FjlrE•»::i .j�.�,}, .1 .. .>1?-..'../' • ,I \ � t ��' . . . . . . •. .,•..,...„ ..,., . , \ , p. ../ ., i r.1 • ii,,v i ,s4 -_,47 . i fi •. . . - [ .,. —CI • it H® .�� a t , i I , t--""..1 • J' . 1 ', / ) 1 , • ,..., -,.. St. a... J t: j fI 'IC 1 \ r. + ,•�j'r L,,. -fin::,, 2 `,,,.__; \ \ / \\ , I I a -r' . , \ \ , \ , . ., , .161 ,,.....i L .� 5 L ^+h • ?a�. `,` 4�a t Z,} i r., Cr 1'1 Po i >Li, 121 . 3 2. 1„ .Z'+\_•j. - , L , ,, , 'II ' 11 iika t0 �' i pi ,'_ _F 4t,1 f �f• 1._ i.. 5 � t •� 7� t �e r�• I '�Y 't1 I I N �1! S 3•�km -1 ST 1140- `' ` s(o . 1t�"r 4�r5�+ +�° it 1 P gil r. • .'ii.,, + ,•ly;.•.� O, 1'�, ,c -_--. i <,.. �'ate•--,,.,,,,Q. ti`- ! . 1� ; == 57aIJL J.' !t�•S! Q : -S TAO,U� /-' ��,rn iD•.�� � M ti;I`7�i •!mu— :\I:'tea Ira \ \\\_ J t r �'i :"�i Y�%s Y•' a r: a • -J u _tr• }awn*S7 m..� ,av ;� : s )1 \ \\\''', . .:99,1. , ,:li.:...-.! '4.7..4' ,,,,.,.-7 ..,, ", 4Iliarg_:.. -,...,.1:-.7,4,1 .. 4 I: MY :-N�_ ,. VF.. .� t j jt k •let , \ 7Ifl1(JdIi mall• iiiiiipli S?, I,..r F! x9i© , T�' yJ- ,.+, en' MB �� ,� . • pp//.� ' . -- • = t A T1. - - ; STOe1Ns ,• � �. a 9 ,.a is .+ '1• 1 11 •• r ' 1— r i _ �,,,, /, — : c L/B£RT • Sw ' '—' i . I ''' IBMS- ,;..,a .' -14/ p-i h to t D,i _7. . \ . a.9 �9 �e: MI win J� •°' *4 C.! 1 Pei T.--- I..., ,, , E ILI' ''i•i .•-•'• IL‘,N:.--e.,, . I h �'7- -' s m \ 1 R-2. ., R+.� ' 1 * 1. 9 ~- '-j-* tJ 9lNIOR JyNIOR ' � T I��r'� !\� \ «�� 'l r,u ru 23 • , S� • !4.N �S, } • • • • • • • APPLICANT BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE COMPANY TOTAL AREA 0.87 ACRES • PRINCIPAL ACCESS EAST PERIMETER ROAD • EXISTING ZONING P-1 . • EXISTING USE AIRCRAFT ENGINE TEST FACILITY PROPOSED USE CHAINING OF 1 • - . • COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN PUBLIC/QUASI PUBLIC COMMENTS ' . • • Revision 3/1981 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: SITE APPROVAL SA-013-82 Location: Apron "A", east side of Renton Municipal Airport, adjacent to S . Cedar River Bridge. Applicant: Boeing Commercial Airplane Company a ®Public Works Department ®Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 3-10-82 ®Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: 3-30-82 * Utilities Eng. Division 4. 0 Fire Department 1 , 0 Parks Department ®Building Department 0 Police Department ®Others: Policy Development COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P.M. ON "EI/REVIEWING D PARTMENT/DIVISION: /g(- Approved ® Approved with Conditions [' Not Approved I • ,'L- DATE: � ,- -. Signature of Director or Au horjze Representative u REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: (,1Th 1 rY 0097 Approved ElApproved with Conditions 0 Not Approved &ti &dafrt.„PALt., 4--/-e_ 4 etiPobt: i pLelAri.---e—t4- — -16/-4-01 da 6cis_ %., , • , ot „1„24.,..,. rift, 4 ,,,,,,,,d_ 4,,,,,,,A. f . DATE: 3/r! $2- Signature of Direc .- or Authorized Representative • UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJECT LATE COMERS AGREEMENT • WATER /V0 LATE COMERS %CREEL ENT • SEVIER SYSTEM DETS.iPA1ENT CHARGE • WATER No SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE • SEWER NO SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE • WATER I /JD I SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE - SE':;ER /gyp APPROVED WATER FLU ND APPROVED SEWER PLAN tiO APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS ND BY FIRE DEPT. FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS riAvision 3/1981 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : SITE APPROVAL SA-013-82 Location: Apron "A". east side of Renton Municipal Airport, adjacent to S . Cedar River Bridge. Applicant: Boeing Commercial Airplane Company IQ; :Public Works Department ®Engineering Division . SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 3-10-82 ['Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: 3-30-82 ®Utilities Eng. Division ®Fire Department 1 Parks Department ®Building Department Police Department ®Others: Policy Development COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: eige7/ S ®Approved DZ Approved with Conditions ® Not Approved G�J / G- 7'/7'/S %tJ L-5-dv i L S'r 9"/? 9 //VC/re-2/`16" C9 e4C7 77/4 ✓U a/S C' 2 &7 L e3.0 7//[_ " GL?JMr / /v G- •r /4- ? / C uJ/-1 s wd47 T/7"/ t /T ecii 4 416 r/U C/F' s�- 7Y/ ti z 1 ` DATE: /70/tC%F j- 2 Signature of Director or utho zed Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: [I unproved D Approved with Conditions Not Approved DATE: 3 . Signature of Director or Authorized Representative • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ,,,„. .6 /.41,- ,..,c Approved ® Approv ith Conditions ® Not Approved DATE: ?—tJ 2 Signature. of 1r tor or Authorized Representative • REVIEW G DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 6 'pproved ®Approved with Conditions DNot Approved • / „...•: / ./ e(77 a (i DATE: - --9' 7/-2--- Signat re of Director or Authorized Representative I REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: %0''7_9//76e/9/;'2 �� Approved ® Approved with Conditions . J Not Approved ( /iZ/ Signature of D' ctor g_. Authorized resentative DATE: 3-- 9'8Z REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION• / r-a pproved Approved with Conditions ❑Not Approved • • ,--4- _._- ----- - c_______ h Signature of Director or Authorized Represen ative (Ay) DATE: WeY/Z. <evision 3/1981 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: SITE APPROVAL SA-013-82 Location: Apron "A". east side of Renton Municipal Airport, adjacent to S . Cedar River Bridge. Applicant: Boeing Commercial Airplane Company • TO: :public Works Department Cl Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 3-10-82 /7 Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: 3-30-82 ❑Utilities Eng. Division ❑Fire Department • ❑Parks Department ['Building Department ❑ Police Department ❑Others: Policy Development COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: -✓�.9/rJeerw.-�7 • M Approved ® Approved with Conditions [' Not Approved • • >f �i DATE: 3-- 9-;a. Signature of 0' ctor Authorized Presentative l/ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: / 'c zy/fr, pproved ❑Approved with. Conditions ❑ Not Approved b (A :�YI DATE: �� Signature of Director or Authorized Represen ative F». DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE E Application No(s) : SA-013-82, SM-012-82 Environmental Checklist No. : ECF-012-82 Description of Proposal : Modify apron "A" engine test position. Proponent: BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE COMPANY Location of Proposal : Apron "A" , east side of Renton Municipal Airport, adjacent to S. Cedar River Bridge. Lead Agency: RENTON BUILDING & • ZONING DEPARTMENT This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on March 10, 1982, following a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Building & Zoning Department . Oral comments were accepted from: Ronald Nelson, David Clemens, Richard Houghton, Garry Norris, Robert Bergstrom, Camille Radcliffe, Roger Blaylock, and Jerry Lind. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-012-82 are the following: 1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by: Lee T. Hedin DATED: February 19 , 1982 2) Applications : SA-013-82, SM-012-82 3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Traffic Engineering Division, Utility Engineering Division, Design Engineering Division, Policy Development Department, Fire Department, Parks and Recreation Department, Police Department and Building & Zoning Department. Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43. 21C. 030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: Will not adversely affect adjacent properties and that the following requirement shall be complied with : Must meet with F.A.A. approval. Signatures : )i. 4//n . ((// Ronald G. Nelson atiiR. Cle ens Building & Zoning Director Policy Development Director , 7 ...� , t` Richard C. Houghton ; Public Works Director DATE OF PUBLICATION: March 15, 1982 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: March 29 , 1982 Date circulated : march 8, 1982 Comments due : March 10, 1982 --------------- ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW! SHEET ECF - 012 - 82 APPLICATION No(s) .. SA-013-82 SM-012-82 PROPONENT: Boein Commercial Air lane ' Com an PROJECT TITLE : Modify Apron "A" Engine Test Position Brief Description of Project : Install 300 L.F. additional blast fence (11 ' high) at existing tes pose ion an ex en existing air and electrical utilities. LOCATION: Apron "A", east side of Renton Municipal Air ort adjacent o ear iver rl ge. SITE AREA : 0. 87 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (o) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 'X 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : X 3) Water & water courses : X 4 ) . Plant life : X 5 ) Animal life : X 6) Noise : X 7) Light & glare : X 8) Land Use ; north Aisr-TJart east : Airport south : Airport west : Airport Land use conflicts : None View obstruction : None 9) Natural resources : X 10 ) Risk of upset : x 11 ) Population/Employment : X 12 ) Number of Dwellings : l x 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : x traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : X 15) Energy : X 16 ) Utilities: X 17) Human health: 0 18) Aesthetics: 19) Recreation: X 20) Archeology/history : X COMMENTS: Signatures: . • 6a(1-6-a Ronald G. Nelson Building Official vid R. Clemens / Policy Development Director • • 7.7 L/ 7? ram Richard C. Houghton,/ Public Works Director NOTICE OF' PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON MARCH 30, 1982, AT 9 :00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITION: BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE COMPANY Application to install 300 L.F. additional blast fence at existing test position and extend existing air and electrical utilities, file SA-013-82; located at apron "A" , east side of Renton Municipal Airport, adjacent to S. Cedar River Bridge. Legal descriptions of the file noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITION ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON MARCH 30, 1982, AT 9 : 00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED: March 15, 1982 RONALD G. NELSON BUILDING AND ZONING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I, STEVE MUNSON, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and. for, the State of Washington residing. in King County, on the 12tn. day -of March, 1982. SIGNED: FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No (s) : SA-013-82, SM-012-82 Environmental Checklist No. : ECF-012-82 Description of Proposal: Modify' apron "A" engine test position. Proponent: BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE COMPANY Location of Proposal: Apron "A" , east side of Renton Municipal Airport, adjacent to S. Cedar River Bridge. Lead Agency: RENTON BUILDING & • ZONING DEPARTMENT This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on March 10, 1982, following a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Building & Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Ronald Nelson, David Clemens, Richard Houghton, Garry Norris , Robert Bergstrom, Camille Radcliffe, Roger Blaylock, and Jerry Lind. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-012-82 are the following: 1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by: Lee T. Hedin DATED: February 19 , 1982 2) Applications : SA-013-82, SM-012-82 3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Traffic Engineering Division, Utility Engineering Division, Design Engineering Division, Policy Development Department, Fire Department, Parks and Recreation Department, Police Department and Building & Zoning Department. Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43. 21C. 030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: Will not adversely affect adjacent properties and that the following requirement shall be complied with: Must meet with F.A.A. approval. Signatures : "7/ , & //) //7 Ronald G. Nelson .a-ii . Cle ens Building & Zoning Director Policy Development Director Richard C. Houghton Public Works Director DATE OF PUBLICATION: March 15, 1982 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: March 29 , 1982 Date circulated : rch 8, 1982 Comments due : March 10, 1982 EP VIRONRENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 012 - 82 APPLICATION No (s) . SA-013-82, SM-012-82 PROPONENT : Boeing Commercial Airplane Company PROJECT TITLE : Modify Apron "A" Engine Test Position Brief Description of Project : Install 300 L.F. additional blast fence (11 ' high) at existing test position and extend existing air and electrical utilities. LOCATION : Apron "A" , east side of Renton Municipal Airport, adjacent to S. Cedar River Bridge. • SITE AREA : 0. 87 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : X 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : X 3) Water & water courses : X 4 ) Plant life : X 5 ) Animal life : X 6) Noise : X 7) Light & glare : X 8) Land Use ; north : Airport east : Airport south : Airport west : Airport Land use conflicts : None View obstruction : None 9) Natural resources : X 10 ) Risk of upset: X 11 ) Population/Employment : x 12 ) Number of Dwellings : x 13 ) Trip ends (ITE ) : X traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : X 15 ) Energy : X 16) Utilities: JC 17) Human health: X 18) Aesthetics : X 19) Recreation: X 20) Archeology/history•: X COMMENTS: Signatures: 70,/ROiald G. Nelson Building Official vid R. Clemens Policy Development Director Rich n;ard Co Houghto / Public Works Director NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON • The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance for the following project: BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE COMPANY Application to install 300 L. F. additional blast fence at existing test position and extend existing air and electrical utilities, file ECF-012-82, SA-013-82, SM-012-82; located at apron "A" , east side of Renton Municipal Airport, adjacent to S. Cedar River Bridge. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by March 29, 1982. Published: March 15, 1982 OF ! • a®o ";`` '"' ® BUILDING & ZONING DEPA,I TMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 0,9 ® '" ' �� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 ® 235-2540 OTF0 SEP1EMP BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MARCH 12, 1982 Boeing Commercial Airplane Company P.O. Box 3707 , Mailstop 62-15 Seattle, Washington 98124 Re: Application to install 300 L.F. additional blast fence at existing test position and extend existing air and electrical utilities, file SA-013-82; located at apron "A" , east side of Renton Municipal Airport, adjacent to S. Cedar River Bridge. Gentlemen: The Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on March 10, 1982. A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for March 30, 1982, at 9 : 00 a.m. Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing. If you have any further questions, please call the Renton Building and Zoning Department, 235-2550. Very truly yours, RecitipeciT L, (41 Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:cl • C _ Sri,L ., , a e FIAT?, •�+ fit- r'.1 v !Fry u-o5L ' yy ,. ,,e ,� r ,, e ..:-4.tit� ' `� • 44 .. "It ,�•yy` r` ti t_ �.. �. �+ t .4411 -r l qk o a�a as, La ''% .,.k, ' :i , lies ',�,, ,4 g * i t F yy .' '" P' tiv- LOCATED AT APRON '"A`", EAST SIDE OF RENTON MUN1 C,IPi'L A I RPOP,T, . ADJACENT TO S , CEDAR RIVER BRIDGE . LEGAL, eC, I TI T1/4N 3FILE f "' 7'8 Fla a MmalirIF TO PO 0 TIF V PeR :ioim i ,R"ry i 'N ill: C y LJzL1JC `« x k TO BE HELD IN CITY COUNCIL A •r“ '' 'z.- „ ;'y '', '',; ,,• I MUNICIPAL BUILDING . ! j , ON MptfCH, , BEGINNING , .�-99 1 . . I-t..4.4:'. sex' , • . L• '` rC NC E 11 Iy E , Selig4 , Yy( El REZCINF: . Sr i L ill-- 1 r"-2'01.',„i'-c),(4'--.11rikA..,,7474X r -,44-...T 1 1". 4:1" i_A_,,,- -(:\Lf--•'• 'r-- 'r - '!,k„L.;F:1_,. rcii(tt;•• ; • •-.--1Z .._:-] /.�1y, 11r}yr�M �c.� / Aar yam- ♦ ] ': .. %` � .•tit yf A y,1 1� � � 0 R at Iy ] ` �. Fes• 1. I. 1 s' ', •a.,. . . 15 • ` 1:::ISIGNIFIt Ahtwr DIRECT. .ARPEAL . ,TO •.` ..' .I : �' 1} ,>r, 4y- y f". ,t. r •. M ) j� .} 1- j J'�o,.1•. ,'7C.•:�."�r'- } ., yi '.,r+C_ s ,• f' �•44i,,• E ,A INiEE 1; ., " "' MARCH 2:'1G?/ +�t� - e' , `, ,, 'f.^i ,pv- � k•fi� FOR. FU Ell.,;I1' .�•y M• '$ON..CA�,.'W,4 fl , 0_, t;4 4• ,,. %,.,`•,....,• ��, gip- -, ... T A ,pt .''•'-, + ,e: • +it Y.t P-t i'� .'$i% ,ij ,�:;• y i�t ... r r 14 .,. tier L „ THi 1111 'I r _�i- .+!"" . . a '� 1/0 o- 1. t ti ' 4. .� 5 i SSG '� uirr. i ,' t' ' t,yy���� p — 11 •....., T y'. •A iti r�' y -Mr''4�0.t y: i, 'irll' .,i .44 t '' ',." +r ah . r,.i;.: 1'. ,, : �'i `' `,^•:, a ..i'ti Y w 4 7 � k�"i• <.• ,# 1 -P`� �'" ,. r rr ' ei y'�y`,, 5 . t.%' }.•.k° .• ,r -,. . TjNr $' �- - ,._.i $ .• .. ,yi Yf C .jl !}R " i 'r •'i,`+`�. �' �''b �y',rTe r `T�#�.. li..I .S#; '7 I..r ,; . f✓ ,r FF�„� w.i ., ,�• _ ,"•...,.f 1 ! FAl•,4 f.,.,rf r 'y 4'1' 4',,•q * 4 A, ,+ r. t i M•tlf ,y • • a �s, fir• I'� `7�-'s .� eelrIID°9�1#_: .R ► .. • CITY OF RENTON CITY OF RENTON] APPLICATION F E B 1 91982 SITE APPROVAL FOR OFFICE USE ONLY BUILDING/ZONING. DEPT. File No. SA- (9j8- Filing Date Application Fee $ . , 0�° Receipt No . 51. Environmental Review Fee $ APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : 1. Name Boeing Commercial Airplane Co. Phone 237-1013 Address P. 0. Box 3707, M/S: 62-15, Seattle, Wa. 98124 2 . Property location Apron "A" , east side of Renton Municipal Airport, adjacent to S. Cedar River Bridge. 3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) Property leased from City of Renton; legal description on file with City. • 4. Number of acres or square feet 0.87 acres Present zoning P1 5 . What do you propose to develop on this property? Install 300 L.P. additional blast fence at existing test position and extend existing air and electrical utilities. 6 . The following information shall be submitted with this application: A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , Scale existing structures , easements , and other - factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20' B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan 1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ' to 800 ' D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) 7. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER ACTION : Date Approved Date Denied Date Appealed Appeal Action Remarks VICINITY MAP 4 z e-- IY 0 z •M{N6t as ) 1:AKe w� 1; I. 1 ji ' t ` �9-0{ 99-01 I \____. __—. ' --"-� 99-0{ II 1 + U a si % is`'''''.-60 ..--1:t i. u 0 % I I 1 " 'J II t r pia 1 4! :�� Q 99-0{ f 1 7 si\l H 0 p c9—r m u 1 f9-1 I a 11 0 I o� J CO 1 1 k kc—I.' ' II/. / is j()S cc / / ix. 2 Ci ON ■.; 1����� 'III_ , —_�B ! 1 . AVM 1LOdbIIV ••,t • ' I11 • . : ' i1 l ; .., i i , ' I1; : ; 1 . i 1: II , 1 • ...-'? !1 : 1 . ! kW:1 . 1. 11 VI ;11 .11 F ;I 11 ,.i . : Ij •ii ; ` .. . . . .t! 11 ,I , 11 ; ,.f 1 ' . . '1 f i. , ,',,,,,: ' I "t1' . , ti ,,, .,,: !;1i, 11,41, 1., ; : . '}, I; �11 1 ! „ ; li; ; , ' 11 ' ll Il�.:�, I •W;i � . . il ;Ii .11I' 1 � }: : + 'r1yy il• il�, � + + " �f .i' I �i 1• 1 i . II V• ; .-111 •, .I11y •)III ' ' , • I ii1 III . II ! I1 , 1 f1I , 'a.' S; I :: I. , ' ' ' 111 • ' II •'; 1.� M M aMaa�'Be osa M Ms Oa DowMe w�N N.11�0 N..aN , t , } 1 . 1 , !_1 : ,1' �. i j�l• f I call w als Ms w Me alp lay q t1Ma0 aaYaaMa� \ ; f '• j i . I Ill';'L��MI BN c/N mu sa�aMNa asl tlN A Naato aaa•esss�w 1 1 1 I t�,i 1 ; / t } ` �.p. M WNY.re el �sW Y//r�/M�MYM' I t f ' }I �l'♦ , 1 I :ill i ll I I ;i 1 1 ( I 1 f I 111 1 1 1 '! '1 1 IVI �+'If I ,� .1-I �.4411'1'iTllrl I I I ! I{ �1 1 I ! • f • .1I1I y I;..i ' i 1 � • � 1 r .iy. 11-.t.il�.1.1.�.•..1.,. 4a � • • .l-.,. ,.t .•+ �- I ,f� ' ( 1 1 ' � 1 f; I t � 1' ' ' t1�! • fta, 1a. 1Il 'W11ai1; !t t 1 11lj 1 1 .Ili 1 i, t 1 1 }, 4 ' Ili� , i t rIlli ! 116 I ; • ,;I 1 .,.,j1% . il ` 111 • a { it I ,,: . fiJiI 11 i '1� 'J 1 ti' . 1 41. 1) .1 1tli I t IL , •I . 1, II : Pt1 .. C ; 1 , ," 111 ,11.11HV .. _ f i 1I ; I1111AV ! I' 1 ' • 1 i '� I i11I{II 1 If1; `I1 i; i } ; , , ,. I i i. 1r , I1 • 11• l ! ll1ii ' t{' Ii1i} 11 ! ' f1 I 'tI' !• `11 : 1 li, ; �„ I-�: i . ti } 11 It • • I • • I i 1 ill ; 1i11 . .' . . I i ! • I I1 i ' . 11 • ► . I { III, : : : 1: I :` ., I .} II ,! . :i!': : Ili j `;d • • ; ! 11 II 1 , , jc11l111 :• : .ij ; .! ,,.r II , • I I ! 1 `l 1li : 11i ' 1�1� II 1 , 1 !III ' j 1I1. :1�` ; 1 , ," It 1 +1 I � r �p� lIfl / tIIIIM 1 l il : I i • '• I ! 1' f1 ' : 11 ti , „, 'i 11 ; : :�1; ,; ! • is I , I .I , I , ! I • f 4 h 4; {I �. : 1 III1 ,� ;t .1,! , :.� :t1 :ii : IjI ;i ; i I 1 ✓ 1 1 1 i ,� 111 , 1 ' I 1III : : I ! :1I I,; l G `,t1tli ; !I ' I I� :I II I ! M1 I14 II :: :; i ; { tt „--.... r� ; y siaitllStillipaq • S ": .p. 1 . . ' ' .� ['ILI �. , I .iii t Ii • 11l f I,1! :i ; 1 ����.%�� 1 j : , I .�11' i ; PI i111 II1 . . 111 1' •• i i'a' i II I! , ! 1I1 il!�11 : 1i • I I II I f, ; 1t `1 } I ;1 l • I: ; :I', I 1 1 1 • , 1 '� 1 1 !}` i1 1111 i I:; I 1 ' 1 i111 I •, ` I. } ' mil I:. i I t i I ,. I I li 'II `+ j1� . ! . i I. .. 1 i • 11 it j t• ; { 1 li I II ►� :1 4 f l I i 'III 1 1) lit: ! !!;1.11 : 1 }� j �. •;� j;l; ���ii ; I1 { �� I I 1 • ;I ,► ;!.: 1 I ! I •,r / I I/ ! ` I.' I `� ( I i I' ! 1' 11'• ! :� 1, I 1 11 1 i i 11 , 11 1 � 1 � II.:j1 ' III . : 11 till I ;^ I ` •I I i III 11i Il . Ii 11 ' �' 1 1 I :� I I 1 .I ,1 ' 1: • I1 , if �� i _► t � I; I1Ii�I1 1 l 1 _ I t � �,�- 1 : I R • IM tisa - saiw sil Ist ssf1il ii a:a.a+sias ' t ,t I ' ,` 1: ' mama u MO ssaalsSWUM SWIM iaiaallMaa aaiasasaaasalwm • • I r ( , 11� • :Mil I : 1 ri aaas asssaaaaaam asmaawaaaaslaaaaaaxaasamaasos I .s/ i .■ I - I , . • r 1 r is 1a ./�ai1 iW.FLii_Limma iYa slut. � . .........aaa.,:lin �IU1� 1 1 # . 0 C Ijil b / 1 I Ii111 : 1 I I C�� iIII ! ; ft. l1 I . II y• 1 ' , . } 1� . ' I I I I IIi , �� I I 1 i • r1 ' 1 1 }I ; i ' + I± 11�! 1 I I I , 11; ; it , I I ' ' 1 f t. �' i } I 11 } i ! �C ', 1' 11 1 I; i 1 I1,;�:11 , • 1 !i 1 ' { . I1. I I l 1 4 1 ,I : Ih1 1 I } i ' ;1ii11 I ' i,, ;; . , 1 Ili ! ; t r } I11V 1 ; 11 yI I ICI ,11 , t I I ,, I1� ' I • ! { I III ; 41 0; 1 I Ii II; II l ;ISI IIIII1`111: . t P. t ii i !:il!.' . IIi1I11,it1 • 1 If {[q. �' II it II III ; II 1 II 1i ,. - . li ',' 'I 1 I 1 � I .! . I . f : � llltil!�I!II ;t111 i! 1 1t :! 1 t 111 1 ' I • ! • •• „ II I' I Ir111.:11 1:I I: i ;! 1I1 I1;;, {, . 111! I'1• ''I ' ill !I 1 . II I ' ' '; ' '! ' Il !Il1111 ' I11i 1 ' I' I : I' 1111 ' ' !11 '' `! ! i1II !1 !�I . II'' ' � �11 . ; I'1'' . II! I11 ' ! : ' 1I ';:: 4 I 1 � ' I 1 'at I li •1 I1 f 1111III II 'J,t. I1 IIII {iI ' }li 1I1 II1II IiI1}1iI11 1!+ !!1'iili 1i (�! ;L} t : j ' , t111 ,: i.j4'1 ;IIi!111 1.111 . Ii !I.` •} f} I ' .t; 'I:Illiili{III, �II1 !ItIII�IIIHI�111 Iltl:!ttt ��:l , ;:ill !11! 1!1I} ,: I ,1I !. •.;j111llt . t1 II ' 1. 11 ;:l1I ;:. . ,L .1. "S: ,bbt. . • . . . • . . , . • . . ., . .• . . , . , . . . . . . . . .. . . . • . . .. • . .. , , • . , . . . . . . . . . . . , • . • • ,. , ...... . ..„.: ,... , ,.,,... • . . . • , ‘......•. . . , ,- • • . „O°t,.:." a l i1 V,,•s , . , , . . • i_5 N • - N�� �.I5. . • • , . . $ .11 7.A1 -/.dI, NI3 1S•IX3V- \ ' {jI I 1 1 i f , i • j � il - , I . il .: \.C:'1 - 7 ii. " i . . . •,`. .• • _... t i •• I; /f E , k f lr t. 'II' 1 1 . l.. l ' r t !1 i 1 1 ; • i (d.,..L) 1 . {^ ' ``"__. ._.. °' _ ' Pi __..._.. ' •_..... • il Ili • • • l k�.. ! i i i 1 . - IiN _ ii • • • "' �- ".:;E'4fo ' r -; �. " .5.-' OddriS': 3 - • NVA' J-S X3 f ? - !. • �(cu. -,o t .. .. ,:,: ..- , . • _ — .."--- ..-'-' •.,. ...1.--' V 4 \1 .. 1)*k. • - .• . •,. • , . ..„ . ••• - . .. •. . , • • :,... •',,''. ' !. 4 ••/ ‘i4,,4. -- , . • . . _ - -- - .• : ••: - . • i . .. '-•.' - .' ' '• il .\*c," 7'.‘•-^1-• "--' D E TA 1 L • . _ .. .. _ \ ZA • ,..., 1.....,..x ri • ail --,----, _-- ,-,..3!, • • V.:... , . •i - i V: 1 i 1 , A ;,;*-- VA. • . • 1 I ,...=. . _ 2 , I ' • Vit .. ) ', , ...a r• ,., al ‘,: I '1/41.X N t W 1-., 1. . /8 k ‘. 'tREIN • . . , . i - .!...-• i-6 „. .-3.71 F_FE-H.-E R5.: ...( ( 11 -.rk-,i- -,_._ - ._... . . ... I . . • . 0 i' N.• )31.is% S'.7- 7:E c.._r ' 1 •;!:. k's ' v. . _ . .. . . ... s N - 1 (44•• ti 1. ' 'IA '••• .• i i te•Ak ,/'Cr. - (,,,Q\c11 ' . _ ,. -••,•,, .• , , I : 11 .. 1 \‘ ••... \,...... • 1 - , I 'IN.. 14,- ‘/.... -11.p -4-• ',Ns, ,:l , (..t..-... -CV. . • -v. 1 L ro•''' — 4 1.:cete .% - Y% ,•.. • - - . '. • 4. • ' ' ,1"4.. \dO _ , _ • ,' 1 - ' • . .t. (/5 I ASH4Q,LT I - , , . - - \ • • • „t• , 12.,(,) ,,1--. - . ..t - fAvi.Ncy.:_.-A . i . .- .. . . - ... - - - . . - :.'i....--,-.1 : , - . . - -- , • •-• Au,- -- .:---.1 . .. .-:- --.vi-- , . ._ -.___ _-....,,,___\,... .•-• - . ,,-, -.... ,.., : t ,\ - -- .,;------'-;:-.---,--- -,---.7———7.------0--- ---•:'-----*', ...... ' •...4,:—.......i...21._:.:4..•________ !...... ___ • 1--- ..,,, ' • ,. ,- ..-:- - ., J' - - -2-<-. , ,. ,.., . -.,--,,T. A.:i •.1 .., , _ • , . .i. -______:_-__ __.,- _.,__0(.., -,;: ._.. .. ..• A-. , ., . ., , _, :e.,,.......,Kr;.„,;.„. / - , .•• • - vs, • • - • ;. .,.‘,..,.....,,.,-s...,.:?;.,::...5;,,• _• , - -.1:. , 1 . . _ • --- E)057- , CONC, ,Foo-ritvG .. . . . A 71—Y.P.1 c-A0---. Bei ji is..f.,1E. t-As.VT- - ... ..ic_ ._ S .--c-"r 1 c:7N-S / 1 -- • ,''....':•.;_ ' y P 1 c....06% 2.„,G 1 V .T :. • - . . -. . - . 3 .- . . .. ._ qiipY --.'• 2 . - • .. . . - ' . •- ' - • ..-'. '-' - - . - SCA LE Va" :' -.) 9,-1::::;".• ' • . ' '..-: -- • ••• ., 1 •, - ,... . , . .. • _ . ... . : . . : .... là „ , . AFFIDAVIT 1, LEE T. HEDIN being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property ro y involved -foregoing statements and answers herein ncontained this land tthe ion and n herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the bast of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me • this 19th day of February 1982 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Auburn Name of Notary Pu is Hannah F. Kimball (Signature of Owner) L. T. Hedin, Operations Manager (Agent for Owner) 1412 F. St. S.E. , Auburn, Washington 98002 (Address) Boeing Commercial Airplane Co. (Address) (Commssien Expires May 20, 1984) P. 0. Box 3707, Mailstop 62-15 Seattle, Washington 98124 (Citys (State) 237-9982 (Telephone) • (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICA2'ION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough end complete in •very particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of th• Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application. Date Received ri. c R TION , 9 By: • ti FEB 1 91982 Renton Planning Dept . BU:LCING/ZONING DEPT. 2-71 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON • • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM CITY OF RENTON FEB 1 91982 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. Application No. S/7 --0/-g'T6• E 1- TD- Environmental Checklist No. PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date: 0 Declaration of Significance ODeclaration of Significance 0 Declaration of Non-Significance 0 Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and _which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in. the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent Boeing Commercial Airplane Company 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: P. 0. Box 3707, Mailstop 62-15 Seattle, Washington 98124 237-9982 3. Date Checklist submitted February 19, 1982 4. Agency requiring Checklist Building & Planning Departments 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: Modify Apron "A" Engine Test Position. 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : Install 300 L.F. additional blast fence (11' high) at existing test position and extend existing air and electrical utilities. -2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : Apron "A" , east side of Renton Municipal Airport, adjacent to S. Cedar River Bridge. 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : May 1, 1982 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal (federal , state and local--including, rezones) : Building & Electrical Permit Shoreline Development Permit City of Renton Site Approval '10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion , .or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: No . 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by ' ,your. proposal ? If' yes , explain: No • • 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future ' date, describe the nature of such application form: _ Building & Electrical Permits - to be submitted March, 1982 Shoreline Development Permit - submitted 2/19/82 City of Renton Site Approval- submitted 2/19/82 (See Attachments) • • II. ENVIRONMENTAL ' IMPACTS '(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) (1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic • substructures? ' . X YES MAYBE NO (b) Disruptions, displacements , compaction or over- X covering of the soil? YES - MAYBE NO • (c) Change in' topography or ground surface reliefX • features? .. ' YET— MAYBE NO (d) The destruction, covering or.modification of any unique geologic. or physical features? X YET— MAYBE II-6— (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? X YES ' MAYBE' NO.. (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or . changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which . may modify the channel of a river or stream or the•;; • bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X YET— MAYBE. Nu- Explanation: • Extension of existing electrical conduit. : • -3- ~ . (2) Air. Will the proposal result in: . (a) Air emissions or deterioration wf ambient air � � quality? ` YES MTYBr 0d- X .(b).- The creation of objectionable odors? YM MAYBE N�- ' (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in clim�tm either locally or � ^ X - ' regionally? TIES- MAYBE Wd- Explanation: ' ' ` � (3) Water' Will the proposal result in: ' (a) Changes Changey in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? � 7- YESS- MAYBE NO ' ' (b) Changes �n absorption rates , drainage patterns or ' ` = " " X the rate and amount of surface water runoff? . YES- MAYBE 0d- � (c) 'Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X YES ' MAYBE NO f i t (d) Change in the amount of surface water n any water . . - ' body? X YES-' MAYBE NO' (e) DY'scharge into surface waters , or in any alteration �- surface water quality including but not limited to r temperature, dissmlve" oxygen or turbjdity? l��- MAYBE ' (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of g � ��� ground waters? � ` ��� _ RAYBE NO (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either � ' tbrough' direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer bycuts or excavations? ' % . TES- MAYBE NO '-�h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through'. ` direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, X ` or other 6�tunces into the ground waters! ' ' - ` su ''' Yl� ' �7�Y �� 00- (i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public-.-water supplies? Y��- MAYBE N6- �uplanatinn: ` ' ' (4) Flora. Will the prnpwsal `result in: diversity � b f �a� Change in the ivers t� of species, or numbers o any ' species of flora (including trees, shrubs , grass, crops, m�crn��nra and aquatic plants)? ' YES MAYBE N7/- ^ ' ^(b) 'Reduction of the numbers of. any unique, rare or en6an�ered spewies of flora? X ` YES' MAYBE N7O- ��] Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or ' ' ' 1n�a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing sp c �s� ' .' � ' X � MTYOBT- 0- � '�d�' �wduct�n° �n m. reayw of any agricultural 'crop? ! � X MAYBE �7�- ...-` ' `^ ` Explanation: - � ^ . ' -4 • - (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? X YES M YBE NO (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species. of fauna? . X • - YES MAYBE NO (c)' Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement X of fauna? . YES MAYBE NO (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation:, - - (6) Noise. Will the *proposal increase existing noise levels? X • YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X t , • • - YES MAYBE Nb— Explanation: (8) Land Use. Will the .propbsal result in the alteration of the • • p►'oesent or planned land use of -an area? X YES MAYBE TOT Explanation: • - . • (9) .Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: - -- (a) Incr..ease in the rate of use of any natural resources? ' - ' X YES MAYBE NO (b) Depletion of- any nonrenewable natural resource? ; -" - X YES MAYBE NO - Explanation: • . . . . (10) Risk of Upset.' Does the proposal involve a risk of an ' ' • explosion or the release of- hazardous substances '(inc•iuding, . .-:.but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation). - . X in the event of an accident or upset conditions? -. - — RAYNE 0— -Explanation: (11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? - - _ - X • YES MAYBE Nb— Explanation: -5- ( 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? • . X YES MAYBE .NO Explanation:. • (13) Transportation/Circulation. . .Will .the .proposal .,resu.lt .in:. ,.. ..... • . _ (a)_,;Generation of additional .vehi.cular.movement?• ,• YES MAYBE NO ' . (b,),... Effects_ on existing parking facilities ,, or 'demand . for new parking? X YES MAYBE NO (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? _ - YE 'MAYBE • NO •• , . • (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or ' movement of people and/or goods? X YES ' MAYBE , NO -. (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail „or. ai.r ..traffic? _ ' X YET— MAYBE NO (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? X YES . MAYBE' NO ..: Explanation:,::,. .. , (14)%. Public Services. Will the-. proposal have an effect upon, or result. in.a .need for new- or altered°gov • ernmental ,services . _ in any of' t'he .following areas : . :(a). .., Fire _protection? K,„,., - .. :X . . YES MAYBE NO (b) Poli.ce .protection? - ' YES MAYBE NO. (c) Schools? ,.,. ... YES MAYBE NO ' .. ' (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? ' . X ' . YES MAYBE NO ' (e)' ' Maintenance of public, faci1ities, 'inciudirj'g roads? ' X YES .MAYBE.... NO ' (f) Other governmental services? , X .YES MBE NO . • . ' Explanation:,. ' (15) Energy. Wil,l. -the,proposal result 'in `-- ` : ' _ ..:(a) Use.of substantial 'amount,s of ,fuel• or' anergy' . .... 'X ' ' - .. . . . , YES MMAYBE ' NO': . „(b)• ' Demand upon existing sources of energy, or. require • " -the development of new sources of energy? X " YET: MAYBE W .. .. Explanation: „ (16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a• need for new ' ' systems, or alterations to the following utilities: ' ' • .' . ' (a) Power or natural gas? X • YE : rarer NO ' . `S (b) Communications systems? X WC- wav c Nn s -6- (d) Sewer or septic tanks? X YES MAYBE NO (e) Storm water drainage? X YES MAYBENU— (f) Solid waste and disposal?, X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • (17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • (20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical X site, structure, object or building? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: z-7/ ;% T Z-//e1? (signed Lee T. Hedin (name printed) Operations Manager BEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE COMPANY P.O. Box 3707 • Seattle,Washington 98124 A Division of The Boeing Company February 19, 1982 R-6180-1765 CITY OF RENTORN City of Renton, Planning Dept. D 200 Mill Avenue South FEB 1 91982 Renton, Washington 98055 Attention: Roger Blaylock Cirtfi R!G!ZONING DEPT. Reference: Boeing Commercial Airplane Co. Proposal to Modify Apron "A" Engine Test Position A-9. Subject: Environmental Checklist, Substantial Development Permit and Site Approval Applications. Dear Mr. Blaylock: Transmitted herewith are the subject applications for approval of Boeing's proposal to Modify Apron "A" Engine Test Position A-9, as follows: (9) ea. Environmental Checklist Form (6) ea. Application for Site Approval (with attachments: Vicinity Map, Site Plan, Elevation & Section Details) (4) ea. Substantial Development Permit Application (with attachments: Site Plan, Vicinity Map, Elevation & Section Details, Affidavit of Ownership, Drawing 105-A-1016(S-1) Blast Fence Modifications, Renton Field Apron "A" Layout) . • (1) BCAC Check No. 141716 in the amount of $319.00 for filing fees. Publication dates of the Shoreline Management Notice of Application are February 18 and 25, in the Daily Record Chronicle. The newspaper has been instructed, per your request, to send the notices of publication directly to the Planning Department. As you know, from our previous conversations, this project is critical to the 757 delivery schedule. Our completion date is May 1, 1982. We deeply appreciate your department's commitment to expedite these applications in order to help us meet the required completion date. Please keep us advised of permit progress. If there is anything else we can do to assist you in the process, contact us immediately. Ve truly your 6,,,,w7 f�g�j- �'L/7�„�,, Hannah F. Kimball Lz Engineering Services 01/ inio rteceipt # � i '{t CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT NAME = i <.r' C;, ( f-r t 1'4 )11 I:. ' y i.;i• r DATE f PROJECT & LOCATION 736 > } f A c.;f.', ',,{i, ; �. ; ;.r . - :R . Application Type Basic Fee Acreage Fee Total Environmental Checklist Environmental Checklist Construction Valuation Fee if TOTAL FEES Please take this receipt and your payment to the Finance Department on the first floor. Thank vou. 54 1. fly 4 .. •.' ;t r • 0 n 8 FILE TITLSE sow g--- • .. .t ' Vie; w, t �.,,.•;• .;�_ I 4' �r� •aim T-'t Wit: _ 1, •. t' Qti. M' { ,. M r. a • y- t ➢an '1} 1,1 w I. ., y:3a-G'} • •' B i • f :15 � YF}s1 ;K