Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutEx 07_Environmental Checklist.pdf SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 1 of 14 SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of checklist: Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal. Instructions for applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use “not applicable” or "does not apply" only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown. You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision- making process. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Instructions for Lead Agencies: Please adjust the format of this template as needed. Additional information may be necessary to evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse impacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the applicable parts of sections A and B plus the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). Please completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proponent," and "affected geographic area," respectively. The lead agency may exclude (for non-projects) questions in Part B - Environmental Elements –that do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal. A. Background [HELP] 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 720 South 55th Street – Clearing & Grading 2. Name of applicant: Daniel Lee, Owner SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 2 of 14 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 720 South 55th Street, Renton, WA 98055, 425-626-0601, Daniel Lee 4. Date checklist prepared: July 28, 2022 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton, WA 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Clearing and grading was conducted in 2021. Since the work was conducted without a permit, two warnings of violation (CODE21-000495) were issued to stop work and assess required permit processes. The Clearing and Grading Permit process and this SEPA Checklist is directly associated with the remedial efforts of the previous mentioned warnings. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No, there are no further plans. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. An Arborist/Tree Inventory Report prepared by Greenforest Incorporated in May 2022, and Targeted Technical Information Report prepared by Core Design, Inc. in May 2022. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None at this time. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Clearing & Grading Permit & SEPA Determination 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) The proposal requests a review of clearing, grading, and impervious surfaces on site, including 138 trees located onsite prior to the un-permitted clearing and grading activity. The result of this clearing and grading permit will help establish mitigation or corrective measures to resolve two warnings of violation. Impacts related to the previous land disturbing activity equal approximately 36,720 squarefeet of disturbance, and 233 cy of cut with 831 cy of fill. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 3 of 14 map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The location of the proposal includes one primary parcel at approximately 2.50 acres inside the City of Renton’s city limits, roughly 2 miles from the intersection of State Highway 167 & South 180th Street. The address is assigned as 720 S 55th Street, and the parcel is also identified as Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 312305-9125 in SE Section 31, Township 23, Range 5. Additionally, APNs 312305- 9024 & 312305-9156 are affected by the proposal due to the access easement leading to the primary parcel and are located south of the primary parcel. The legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map can be found in the plan set submitted with this SEPA review. B. Environmental Elements [HELP] 1. Earth [help] a. General description of the site: (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other _____________ b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The steepest slope is approximately 68% within the western portion of the parcel along a short section along the south property boundary. Topography varies across the site. The overall elevation change is roughly 142- feet from the highest points in the east and lowest points in the west. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. Soil type listed by the NRSC Web Soil Survey Map is Alderwood gravelly sandy loam material, 8 to 15 percent slopes at 100% of the area of interest. There are no agricultural lands of long- term significance. No soils were removed from the site, but fill was brought in from 13504 SE 50th Place, Bellevue, WA 98006. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Per City GIS data, the site has regulated slopes and is located within a Landslide Hazard Area. Slopes at more than 40% are predominately located on the west end of the parcel inside the native growth protection area and landslide hazard are noted to the northwest of the existing residence. There are historical records of landslides in the area to the south, near Sprinkbrook Creek, per the WA State DNR Geologic Information Portal. e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Grading has already been conducted on the site, and the associated clearing and grading permit is to ensure proper access configuration, site drainage, and stormwater management. Approximately 36,720 SF (less than 43,560 SF) of area was disturbed prior to this permit application. Roughly 2,540 SF of new gravel was placed along the access easement leading to the existing residence, 3,512 SF of new gravel was placed along the southern boundary of the parcel, and roughly 3,143 SF of new pavement was laid over 1,792 SF of existing concrete and 346 SF of existing gravel near the garage and driveway southeast of the residence. The total amount of impervious coverage previously installed over pervious SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 4 of 14 ground is 7,047 SF. This groundwork activity equaled 233 CY of cut and 831 CY of fill. The source of fill dirt was brought in from 13504 SE 50th Place, Bellevue, WA 98006. Proposed work will include the removal of 2,063 SF of previously placed gravel. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. In general, erosion can occur as a result of clearing and grading activity. However, the clearing and grading activity has already taken place and no erosion resulted from this previous activity. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 7% of the subject primary parcel will be covered by impervious surfaces after completion of the project. The adjacent parcels with affected area within the access easement will be covered by 37% (312305-9024) and 21% (312305-9156). h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Approximately 2,063 SF of landscaping will replace previously installed gravel for restoration purposes. Roughly 21,836 SF of hydroseeding lawn has been previously installed to reduce erosion of native sols onsite. Silt fencing will be utilized around the entire previously disturbed area while landscaping mitigation is performed. Dedication of 19,978 SF of native growth area is proposed for storm mitigation. Overall, dedication of the native growth area and planting proposed outside of that area total approximately 41,814 SF of mitigation is proposed. The planting of 47 trees onsite also assist with erosion control and stormwater management. 2. Air [help] a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction, operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Temporary impacts include construction-related vehicle exhaust and dust particles dispersed from removal of gravel surfaces and landscaping activities. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No, off-site sources of emissions would be those typical for residential neighborhoods, such as automobile exhaust and fireplace/heating infrastructure. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Construction impacts are not anticipated to be significant. 3. Water [help] a. Surface Water: [help] 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. There are no known surface water bodies located onsite, but Lower Green-Duwamish River is located a quarter mile southwest. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 5 of 14 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No, there will not be any work over, in, adjacent, or within 200 feet of surface water bodies. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. No filling or dredging of surface water bodies are anticipated. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No withdrawals or diversions are anticipated. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No, the project site is not located inside of a 100-year floodplain. The subject parcel is located within FEMA FIRM Panel 53033C0987G, Zone X, and noted as an area of minimal flood hazard. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No, the proposal does not involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters. b. Ground Water: [help] 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. The proposed development is located inside the South King County Groundwater Management Area and will be served by City of Renton Water Service Area, a public water system. No wells and no groundwater withdrawals are anticipated. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals. . . ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. The proposed development will be served by City of Renton Wastewater Service Area, a public sanitary sewer system, and no industrial or agricultural uses are anticipated. c. Water runoff (including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Surface water runoff will be generated from the sloping surfaces during natural precipitation events. The runoff will continue to sheetflow across vegetated surfaces and be supported by the proposed native growth protection area to the west. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 6 of 14 No waste materials are anticipated. All surface water will be the result of natural precipitation events. 3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. No, drainage patterns will only be affected within the limits of the development. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, if any: Mitigation will be provided as previously stated in question B-1-h, including dedication of a natural growth protection area, removal of some gravel covered surfaces, and previous planting of trees and grass lawn. 4. Plants [help] a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site: _✓_deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other _✓_evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other ____shrubs _✓_grass ____pasture ____crop or grain ____ Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops. ____ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other ____water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other ____other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Some grass and groundcover vegetation were removed during the previous groundwork, but these disturbed areas received replanting of the same type of grass/groundcover as mitigation. Two trees were also removed previously (T69 & T70), but 47 trees have also been planting since them with 42 of them considered to be significant. Please reference the associated Arborist Report for more information. c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. No threatened or endangered species are known to be on or near the site and according to the WSFW PHS interactive web map, and there are no listed or candidate species occurrences listed. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Proposed landscaping will include the use of similar species as previously removed or other approved species supporting the present habitat, through replanting outside of the NGPA an area of 21,836 SF. Mitigation for the two removed trees and other disturbed trees equate to 35 significant replacement trees. As mentioned before 47 replacement trees have already been replanted, 42 of them are considered to be significant-class trees currently; 35 significant trees are required which provides for an excess of seven more trees than required. Please reference the Mitigation Plan submitted with this development proposal. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 7 of 14 e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. Per WSDA Noxious Weed Data Viewer and King County’s iMap data, Tansy Ragwort have been reported within one half mile of the project site. During a habitat assessment, it was found that Himalayan Blackberry is on the project site as well. 5. Animals [help] a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. Examples include: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds,** other: mammals: deer,** bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, s almon, trout, herring, shellfish, other ________ ** = Not observed onsite, but visitation are likely to occur. b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. No threatened or endangered species are known to be on or near the site and according to the WSFW PHS interactive web map, there are no listed or candidate species occurrences listed. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Yes, like all of Western Washington, the project lies within the Pacific Flyway Migratory Route. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: To help preserve and enhance wildlife, the project is proposing the meet the required tree retention and landscaping requirements to support animal species in the area. e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. No invasive animal species are known to on or near the site. 6. Energy and Natural Resources [help] a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. No form of energy such as electric, gas, or oil will be utilized. The existing residence has existing utilities. No changes in those utilities are proposed. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No, the project will not affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None proposed at this time. 7. Environmental Health [help] SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 8 of 14 a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. 1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. No. There are no known environmental health hazards that could occur as a result of this proposal. 2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. No hazardous chemicals are known to affect this proposal. 3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the project. No hazardous chemicals are stored onsite. 4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. No special emergency services are anticipated. 5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None proposed at this time. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? The main source of off-site noise in this area originates from the vehicular traffic present on S 192nd Street and nearby local access streets. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indi- cate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term noise impacts will result from the use of construction equipment during the removal of gravel and landscape installation. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None proposed at this time. 8. Land and Shoreline Use [help] a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. North: Single-Family East: Single-Family, & Undeveloped South: Single-Family, & Undeveloped West: Single-Family Current proposal does not affect current land uses. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 9 of 14 b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use? There will be no impact on agriculture or forest lands as this parcel has been a privately owned property for many years and is not currently used as agriculture or forest land. 1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how: No, there are no known farm or forest uses in the vicinity. c. Describe any structures on the site. One single-family residence and attached garage. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No structures will be demolished. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Residential 1 DU/AC (R-1), Residential 8 DU/AC (R-8), Residential 14 DU/AC (R-14) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Residential Low Density & Residential Medium Density g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify. Per City GIS data, the site has regulated slopes and is located within a Landslide Hazard Area. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? At least two persons are known to reside onsite due to their listing of name on the title. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: No proposed measures. L. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Site design is regulated per local and state code, and no new structures or changes in land use are proposed. m. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any: SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 10 of 14 None, there are no known agricultural or forest lands in the vicinity. 9. Housing [help] a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, mid- dle, or low-income housing. No new dwelling units are proposed. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. The one existing single-family residence will remain. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None proposed. 10. Aesthetics [help] a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? No new structures are proposed. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? No views will be altered or obstructed. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None proposed at this time. 11. Light and Glare [help] a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? No light or glare is anticipated. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No safety hazards are anticipated. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None measures proposed. 12. Recreation [help] a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Thomas Teasdale Park is north of the project site, and Garrison Creek Park is to the south. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. Not applicable. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 11 of 14 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: 13. Historic and cultural preservation [help] a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers ? If so, specifically describe. There is one site located less than one mile from the project, Upper Daniel Farm. b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. There are not any landmarks or features, such as cemeteries or other evidence of Native American or historic use by regional tribe affiliations. If an archaeological site or artifact is found during construction, the appropriate Historical Preservation Professional will be notified. c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. According to DAHP’s WISSARD predictive model, the site is listed as Moderately Low Risk, which notes that the requirement for a survey is contingent upon project parameters. d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. No measures are currently proposed. 14. Transportation [help] a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is served by South 55th Street just east of it’s intersection with 99th Place South and SE 192nd Street. The parcel utilizes a private access easement along the shared boundary of two previously mentioned parcels south of the subject parcel. b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes, King County Metro has three public transit route available within a quarter mile. c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non-project proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? Only surfacing of the parking area/garage entrance was affected. d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No improvements are required. Only the surfacing of the driveway accessing the parcel was affected. The gravel surface was widened as a result of the new material, from roughly 8 feet to about 15 feet wide. Not applicable. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 12 of 14 e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No, the project will not. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and nonpassenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? Not applicable, no change in trip generation is anticipated. g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. No, the proposal will not interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads in the area. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None at this time. There are no changes to transportation impacts. 15. Public Services [help] a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No changes in public services are anticipated. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None at this time. 16. Utilities [help] a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other ___________ b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity/Gas: Puget Sound Energy Water: City of Renton Water District Sanitary Sewer: Private-Septic Refuse: Waste Management Communication & Media: Comcast / Ziply fka Frontier SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 14 of 14 wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment.