Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA80-037 • BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE / • 1 bo..sr 9 e • _ I d 11,: a'•S. •?1 ';.3i' z3:7 t'-`:'- t' ?tS:{ ';:'1f • 4^;'pia., . ":" k:-'',,.i ...At, .'�r�. �µd:* ,r ��i��:;i ''`:if`t�r.4.:',.l..�v "�.� `,ro+ 7.. `:•4. `V.i axx} �) �'i4.'. -� :: YS�,i•E - • �1 �)'S:�i;"+ - `;t}},>t i'f{{-,�M't .J; .f am.&',1ii. •$mac • -,`4:. �.: 't.4 X,� �„�''�1` R'>•"'.e-: ` � r::=trr:u:. ' - v ''am .:..• .r_. M,.-..,..�;.�•, c X a• <.;s '�� t:: i. C• r '4.' a. - -=y, i� r i'' r, " p ,:U yy :� LL - q. ut' r, ', t• E..;.,r,, yh .Ear' 4�,"ii,.::�.. i. fir, �1n • nt,. Ax, l''ti• r:G �:ta:'''�+ "I' I: : w I.. r, f,--:"ti:y fie. :;;` i . T. °i) fi. rI� ' t }i2G •'J, :t s y�:pFJ ia:�:i. ;�f' .4'�� fir,)-:., x,r:�i�•':r •.li•t. '..:. ro. ,t,: `=,;ir.^ - .{� d�G'`: >(., of• ;1,...�t''„ , . � . .'I": . . Applicant MAY CREEK ASSOCIATES (James S. Fitzgerald. P.O. Box L, Kirkland, WA 9ts033) File No. R-037-80 Project Name SAME j Property Location_ On Lake Washington Boulevard N.E. adjacent to and north of S.E. 76th Street. HEARING EXAMINER: Date 6-2-80 • • Approval with restrictive covenants Recommendation PP IZ 060 6,,z3 40� /P AeCI ‘- -� -6l b-A 3-f • Req./Rec. Date Received Date Response Appeal - Date Received II Council Approval - Date • Date ' Ordinance/ 1l .3y4/� 0�f/8rIn Mylar to County for Recording Mylar Recording # i.7.-',:f RECEIVED -" Remarks: CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER - MAY 9 0 1980 AM PM 7.8 9,10a11,12R112,314,5,6 • :a : i EXHIBIT N �. . l„., . „ •:Yy ' ITEM NO. f- o 3 '1-gO • yE - - ter ;., lkn }M.: r1 +. 2` ' ' I - ,, iiki) Form 81 .•J n'k `v ,` (!n, AUG 19CC , `' Affid• avit of Publication r P E C E a E�►- i l� \73:: CITY of RENTON '5:,:,' CLERK'S OFFICE.,',tJD �'' v, t, t, STATE OF WASHINGTON, tss. ''�,• : t �Y COUNTY OF KING, '° ,�_ t C. BELL being duly sworn, says that she is the principal Clerk of Seattle Times Company, publisher of THE SEATTLE TIMES, a daily newspaper, printed and published in Seattle, King County,State of Washington;that it is a newspaper of general circulation in said County and State; that it has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of King County; that the • annexed, being a retail ad , was published in said newspaper, and not in a .SOf/Ty ZaeVE supplement thereof, and is a true copy of the notice as it was printed in the pegerarid-entire issue of said paper on the following day or days July 23 , 1980 $2 4 . 5 3 Ordinance No. 3446 • So ow ZonlE and that the said newspaper was regularly distributed to its_subscribers during all of said period. 1 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO.3446 * \ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF1/4....t.L.44.0 ' ^IE!7? RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING /(�•/ THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF .1 °, CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM GENERAL , +f eze -CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT (G-9600),RESIDENCE DISTRICT (R•2) R-o37• 80(MAY CREEK ASSOCIATES) 1 Subscribed and onto before me thi Fourteenth day 80 WHEREAS under Chapter 7, Title IV (Building Regulations)of Ordinance No.1628 known as the"Code of General Ordinances of the City of Of August ' 19 80 Renton,"as amended,and the maps and reports I /^ t� adopted In conjunction therewith, the property 1 LZ�Y"" ""� . herelnbelow described has heretofore been zoned as General Classification(G-9600);and 'WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone 1 Notary Public in for a State of Washington classification of said property hos been filed with 1 residing / NM the Planning Department on or about April 2,1980, which petition was duly referred to the hearing 1 Examiner for Investigation, study and public ' hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about May 20,1980,_ond sold matter having been duly considered by the Hearing ' Examiner and said zoning request being In + conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, I as amended, and the City'Council having duly --- - _-- — - considered all mutters relevant thereto,'and all • parties having been heard appearing in support r - thereof or In opposition thereto, NOW I THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REN- TON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The following,described property In the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Residence District(R-2)as herelnbelow specified;eublect to the findings,conclusions and decision dated June 4 2,1980;the Planning Director Is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning i ' Ordinance,as amended,to evidence said rem- inch to-wit: Tract 181,C.D.-Hillman's Lake Washing- ton Garden of Eden Addition to Seattle, Division No. 3, according to the Plat recorded In Volume II of Plats,page 81,In 1 King County,Washington,lying southeast- 1 erly of the southeast margin of Lake Washington Boulevard,Northeast(Kenny- dale Newport Road); together with that portion of vacated County Road No. 34 lying westerly of,the following described • line:Beginning at the southeast corner'of said Tract 181;thence northeriy'along the easterly line of sold tract 181, to the southwesterly line of said vacated County f Road No.34;thence continuing northerly along the last described Ilne extended to a • I point of intersection with the southeaster- , f Iv margin of Lake Washington Boulevard i Northeast(Kennydale Newport Road)and r the terminus of said line.— I • , (Sald property being located at On Lake Washington Blvd. N.E. adjacent to and ! ' north of LE.76th Street) AND SUBJECT FURTHER to that certain Decia . 1 ' ration of Restrictive Covenants executed by Peti- tianer-owners on or about June 23, 1980 and recorded In the office of the Director of Records and Elections,Receiving No.8006230422 and which said Covenants are hereby incorporated and mode _ a part hereof as If fully set-forth. SECTION II: This Ordinance shall be effective I 1 upon Its passage,approval and five days after its I ' publication. ' PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL,this 14th day I of JUIY,1980. 1 (s)Delores A.Mead,City Clerk ' APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 14th day of, ' July,1980. (s)Barbara Y.Shinpoch,Mayor ' Approved as to form: I (s)Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney i Date of Publication:July 23,1980 L = a __ , • I I Gr (737 J'a _ _ . Renton City Council 7/14/8G . Page 5 OLD BUSINESS .- Continued - Transportation ComnAttee Aepoft Lake Washington The Transportation Committee report noted proposed improvements Boulevard and traffic load on Lake Washington Blvd. presentation made to committee; that a future meeting is scheduled with Boeing, Public Works and Parks Departments. Public Safety / The Public Safety Committee report submitted by Chairman Hughes Committee ' recommended revision of the Taxicab Ordinance, 5-1912 - Taxicab ax�T—cab Zones, to establish one additional taxi zone at the northwest Ordinance corner of 3rd Street and Burnett Ave. , contingent with a telephone installation at that location. The committee further recommended referral to the Ways and Means Committee for proper legislation. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECOND SHANE, CONCUR IN REPORT. CARRIED. Councilman Hughes explained the meeting with Mr. Funderburg of Silvertop Cab and noted similarity in taxicab colors with OK Cab, and requested City. Clerk Mead suggest color change to Mr. Funderburg. Recess MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE, COUNCIL RECESS. ROLL CALL: 3-AYE: SHANE, STREDICKE, CLYMER; 3-NO: TRIMM, REED, HUGHES; Mayor Shinpoch broke the Tie with YES Vote. CARRIED. 9:45 P.M. Council reconvened at 9:55 P.M. All Council Members were present , when Roll was called , (as previously shown) . Public Safety The Public Safety Committee report noted the voters of King Committee County approved a six-year regular property tax levy for support King County of emergency medical services and the execution of this contract EMS Contract was a requirement, not a choice. The committee report determined, therefore, no action required by the committee. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECOND SHANE, CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Ways and Means The Ways and Means Committee recommended approval of Vouchers Committee No. 29044 through No. 29346 in the amount of $708,400.08. Voucher Vouchers No. 20939 - 29043 were machine voided.. Vouchers Approval received departmental certification that merchandise and/or services were received. MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND CLYMER, VOUCHERS BE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT. CARRIED. Zoning The committee report recommended that the Zoning Ordinance, as Ordinance proposed for amendment, be referred to the Environmental Review Committee for review of environmental significance. Also, that the matter will be retained in the Ways and Means Committee until a report is received. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, ACCEPT COMMITTEE REPORT. Upon inquiry, Mayor Shinpoch noted the Environ- mental Review Committee is composed of the Planning Director, Public Works Director and Parks and Recreation- Director. CARRIED.. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS ' Ways and Means The Ways and Means Committee report was submitted by Committee Committee Chairman Clymer and recommended second and final readings of Ordinance #3444 the following ordinances which had been on first reading 7/7/80: Pawnbroker An ordinance was read amending the City Code and eliminating Licenses the maximum number of pawnbroker licenses to be issued. MOVED CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, CONCUR IN REPORT AND ADOPT ORDINANCE. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #3445 An ordinance was read amending the Title V of City Code elininating Taxicab Licenses the maximum number of taxicab licenses to be issued. MOVED BY CLYMER,SECOND HUGHES, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #3446 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification from May Creek Assoc. G-9600 to R-2 for property located on Lake Washington Blvd. NE Rezone adjacent to and north of SE 76th St. (Approx. 48th. NE);May Creek Associates R-037-80. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE, ADOPT AS READ. CARRIED. Ordinance #3447 An ordinance was read vacating a portion of Pelly P1 . N. as Pelly Pl . N. petitioned by Lake Terrace Associates within the Plat of Eldon Street Vacation Acres. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, ADOPT ORDINANCE AS READ. VAC-2-80 ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Renton City Council \7/14/8Q. Page 6 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS - Continued First Readings The Ways and Means Committee recommended first reading of the following ordinances:' Hearing Examiner An ordinance was read amending Title IV of the City Code -nd Ordinance,- relating to the Land Use Hearing Examiner. MOVED BY CLYM:R, SECOND SHANE, REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE W: EK. CARRIED. Zoning Ordinance An ordinance was read amending the zoning ordinance. (Se. earlier committee report) . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Cable An ordinance was read establishing2"Cable Communications iievelop- Communications ment Fund #127" for the purpose of promotion and development of cable communications and access channels including govern ent, education and public. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND REED; REFE" BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Fund Transfer An ordinance was read providing for appropriation and tra sfer of funds in amount of $2,000 for Cable Communications Dev-lopment Fund #127. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, REFER TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Ordinance #3448 1980 Housing and An ordinance was read providing for appropriation and tra sfer Community of funds in amount of 258,915 from the 1980 Housing and om- Development ' munity Development Block Grant Program. MOVED BY STREDIC E, SECOND CLYMER, ADVANCE ORDINANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL READINGS, CARRIED. Following reading, MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND STRE) ICKE, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 5-AYE: TRIMM, R ED, STREDICKE, HUGHES, CLYMER; ONE-NO: SHANE. MOTION CARRIE). First Reading An ordinance was read ordering construction and installation LID #318 of !street widening and improvements to NE 30th St. from P:rk Ave. N. to FAI-405; establishing LID #318 and providing m-thod of assessment. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE, RETURN TO HE COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Traffic An ordinance was read amending Chapter 1 , Title X Traffic, Ordinances City Code, relating to adoption of traffic ordinances by reference and establishing penalties therefor. MOVED BY LYMER, SECOND HUGHES, REFER BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARTED. Resolution #2349 The committee report recommended reading and adoption of Alley Vacation resolution setting public hearing 8/18/80 for proposed alley Public Hearing vacation as petitioned by Ivanich et al , VAC-7-80; locate• Ivanich VAC-7-80 between Burnett Ave. N./Park Ave. N. and N. 30th St. and N.29th St. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE, ADOPT THE RESOLUTION LS READ. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Council President Trimm submitted letter from Mr. and Mrs. Animal Control Elmer Neu, 1.409 Blaine Ave. NE and Mr. and Mrs. Thomas B own, Ordinance 1401 Blaine Ave., NE that requested the City Council revi = the animal control ordinance regarding its constitutionality and also regarding noise by fowl . The letter explained 7/3/:0 Municipal Court hearing (City vs Wes Williams) wherein J dge Roger Lewis questioned the constitutionality of Chapter 16-, Section 5-1606-G which deals with more than one kind of -nimal and therefore ruled in favor of the defense. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND SHANE, REFER MATTER TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTE: . CARRIED. ' City Bridges Councilman Clymer inquired re Staff checking of bridges =nd' report to the Administration. Public Works Director Gon ason noted inspection of timber bridges was just completed; Staff member has been sent to bridge inspection school ; other -tructures reviewed annually. Upon further inquiry re unsafe' bridg:s other than Grady Way, Gonnason noted funds budgeted for Monste Road and the load limit will continue on Wells Ave. Bridge, . E gineer suggestion that it be closed is being investigated. -pie : vitt - a Fa r , ;to Renton City Council 7/14/8a . Page 5 OLD BUSINESS .- Continued T Transportation ComrA1tee Report Lake Washington The Transportation Committee report noted proposed improvements Boulevard and traffic load on Lake Washington Blvd. presentation made to committee; that a future meeting is scheduled with Boeing, Public Works and Parks Departments. Public Safety The Public Safety Committee report submitted by Chairman Hughes Committee recommended revision of the Taxicab Ordinance, 5-1912 - Taxicab ax�T ab Zones, to establish one additional taxi zone at the northwest Ordinance corner of 3rd Street and Burnett Ave. , contingent with a telephone installation at that location. The committee further recommended referral to the Ways and Means Committee for proper legislation. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECOND SHANE, CONCUR IN REPORT. CARRIED. Councilman Hughes explained the meeting with Mr. Funderburg of Silvertop Cab and noted similarity in taxicab colors with OK Cab, and requested City Clerk Mead suggest color change to Mr. Funderburg. Recess MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE, COUNCIL RECESS. ROLL CALL: 3-AYE: SHANE, STREDICKE, CLYMER; 3-NO: TRIMM, REED, HUGHES; Mayor Shinpoch broke the Tie with YES Vote. CARRIED. 9:45 P.M. Council _reconvened at 9:55 P.M. All Council Members were present when Roll was called (as previously shown) . Public Safety The Public Safety Committee report noted the voters of King Committee County approved a six-year regular property tax levy for support King County of emergency medical services and the execution of this contract EMS Contract was a requirement, not a choice. The committee report determined, therefore, no action required by the committee. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECOND SHANE, CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Ways and Means The Ways and Means Committee recommended approval of Vouchers' Committee No. 29044 through No. 29346 in the amount of $708,400.08. Voucher Vouchers No. 20939 - 29043 were machine voided. Vouchers Approval . received departmental certification that merchandise and/or services were received. MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND CLYMER, VOUCHERS BE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT. CARRIED. Zoning The committee report recommended that the Zoning Ordinance, as Ordinance proposed for amendment, be referred to the Environmental Review Committee for review of environmental significance. Also, that the matter will be retained in the Ways and Means Committee until a report is received. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, ACCEPT COMMITTEE REPORT. Upon inquiry, Mayor Shinpoch noted the Environ- mental Review Committee is composed of the Planning Director, Public Works Director and Parks and Recreation Director. CARRIED.. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means The Ways and Means Committee report was submitted by Committee Committee Chairman Clymer and recommended second and final readings of Ordinance #3444 the following ordinances which had been on first reading 7/7/80: Pawnbroker An ordinance was read amending the City Code and eliminating Licenses the maximum number of pawnbroker licenses to be issued. MOVED CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, CONCUR IN REPORT AND ADOPT ORDINANCE. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #3445 An ordinance was read amending the Title V of City Code elininating Taxicab Licenses the maximum number of taxicab licenses to be issued. MOVED BY CLYMER,SECOND HUGHES, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #3446 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification from May Creek Assoc. G-9600 to R-2 for property located on Lake Washington Blvd. NE Rezone adjacent to and north of SE 76th St. (Approx. 48th. NE);May Creek Associates R-037-80. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE, ADOPT AS READ. CARRIED. Ordinance #3447 An ordinance was read vacating a portion of Pelly P1 . N. as Relly P1 . N. petitioned by Lake Terrace Associates within the Plat of Eldon Street Vacation Acres. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, ADOPT ORDINANCE AS READ. VAC-2-80 ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Renton City Council 7/14/80.. Page 6 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS - Continued First Readings The Ways and Means Committee recommended first reading of 'he following ordinances: Hearing Examiner An ordinance was read amending Title IV of the City Code a d Ordinance relating to the Land Use Hearing Examiner. MOVED BY CLYME' , SECOND SHANE, REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WE: K. CARRIED. Zoning Ordinance An ordinance was read amending the zoning ordinance. (See earlier committee report) . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE, REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Cable An ordinance was read establishing "Cable Communications D-velop- Communications ment Fund #127" for the purpose of promotion and developme t of cable communications and access channels including. governm-nt, education and public. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND REED, REFER BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Fund Transfer An ordinance was read providing for appropriation and transfer of funds in amount of $2,000 for Cable Communications Development Fund #127. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, REFER TO WAYS 'ND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. - rdinance #3448 1980 Housing and An ordinance was read providing for appropriation and transfer Community of funds in amount of 258,915 from the 1980 Housing and om- Development munity Development Block Grant Program. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, ADVANCE ORDINANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL READINGS. CARRIED. Following reading, MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND STREDICKE, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 5-AYE: TRIMM, R:ED, STREDICKE, HUGHES, CLYMER; ONE-NO: SHANE. MOTION CARRIE) . First Reading An ordinance was read ordering construction and installation LID #318 of street widening and improvements to NE 30th St. from P-r.k Ave. N. to FAI-405; establishing LID #318 and providing m:thod of assessment. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE, RETURN TO HE COMMITTEE FOR ONE 'WEEK. CARRIED. Traffic An ordinance was read amending Chapter 1 , Title X. Traffic Ordinances City Code, relating to adoption of traffic ordinances by reference and establishing penalties therefor. MOVED BY 1LYMER, SECOND HUGHES, REFER BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CAR" IED. Resolution #2349 The committee report recommended reading and adoption of Alley Vacation resolution setting public hearing 8/18/80 for proposed al ey Public Hearing vacation as petitioned by Ivanich et al , VAC-7-80; locate. Ivanich VAC-7-80 between Burnett Ave. N./Park Ave. N. and N. 30th St. and .29th St. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE, ADOPT THE AESOLUTION 'S READ. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Council President Trimm submitted letter from Mr. and Mrs. Animal Control . Elmer Neu, 1409 Blaine Ave. NE and Mr. and Mrs. Thomas Br.wn, Ordinance 1401 Blaine Ave. NE that requested the City Council revie the animal control ordinance regarding its constitutionality -nd also regarding noise by fowl . The letter explained 7/3/80 Municipal Court hearing (City vs Wes Williams) wherein Judge Roger Lewis questioned the constitutionality of Chapter 16, Section 5-1606-G which deals with more than one kind of -nimal and therefore ruled in favor of the defense. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND SHANE, REFER MATTER TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTE:. CARRIED. City Bridges Councilman. Clymer Inquired re Staff checking of bridges -nd report to the Administration. Public Works Director Gon ason noted inspection of timber bridges was just completed; Staff member has been sent to bridge inspection school ; other -tructures reviewed annually. Upon further inquiry re unsafe bridges other than Grady Way, Gonnason noted funds budgeted for Monste Road and the load limit will continue on Wells Ave. Bridge, E gineer suggestion that it be closed is being investigated. Renton City Council 7/14/80 Page 6 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS - Continued First Readings The Ways and Means Committee recommended first reading of the following ordinances: Hearing Examiner An ordinance was read. amending Title , IV of the City Code and Ordinance relating to the Land Use Hearing Examiner. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE, REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Zoning Ordinance An ordinance was read amending the zoning ordinance. (See earlier committee report) . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE, REFER ORDINANCE BACK :10 COMMITTEE. 'CARRIED: Cable An ordinance was read establishing "Cable Communications Develop- Communications ment .Fund #127" for the purpose of promotion and development of cable communications and access channels including government, education and public. MOVED BY.CLYMER, SECOND REED, REFER BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ,ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Fund Transfer An ordinance was read providing for appropriation and transfer of funds in amount of $2,000 for Cable Communications Development Fund #127. . MOV!<D BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, REFER TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. prdinance #3448 1980 Housing and An ordinance was, read providing for appropriation and transfer Community of funds:.in 'amount of 258,915 from the 1980 Housing and Com- Development munity Development Block Grant Program. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, ADVANCE ORDINANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL READINGS. CARRIED. Following reading, MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND STREDICKE, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE. AS READ. ROLL CALL: 5-AYE: TRIMM, REED, STREDICKE, HUGHES, CLYMER; ONE-NO: SHANE. MOTION CARRIED. First Reading An ordinance was read ordering construction and installation LID #318 of street widening and improvements to NE 30th St. from Park Ave. N. to FAI-405; establishing LID #318 and providing method of assessment. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE, RETURN TO THE COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Traffic . An ordinance was read amending Chapter 1 , Title X Traffic, Ordinances City 'Code, relating to adoption of traffic ordinances by reference and establishing penalties therefor. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, REFER BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Resolution #2349 The committee report recommended reading and adoption of a - Alley Vacation resolution setting public hearing 8/18/80 for proposed alley / Public Hearing vacation as petitioned by Ivanich et al , VAC-7-80; located Ivanich VAC-7-80 between Burnett Ave. N./Park Ave. N. and N. 30th St. and N.29th St. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE, ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ.. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Council President, Trimm submitted letter from Mr. and Mrs. Animal Control Elmer Neu, 1409 Blaine Ave. NE and. Mr. and Mrs. Thomas Brown, Ordinance . 1401Blaine Ave.: NE that requested the- City Council review the animal control ordinance regarding its constitutionality and also regarding noise by fowl . The letter explained 7/3/80 Municipal Court hearing (City vs Wes Williams) wherein Judge Roger Lewis questioned the constitutionality of Chapter 16, Section 5-1606-G which, deals with more than one kind of animal and therefore ruled in favor of the defense. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND SHANE, REFER MATTER TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE. CARRIED. ' City Bridges Councilman Clymer inquired re Staff checking of bridges and report to the Administration. Public Works Director Gonnason noted inspection of timber bridges was just 'completed; Staff member has been sent to bridge inspection' school ; other structures reviewed annually. Upon further inquiry re unsafe bridges other than Grady Way, Gonnason noted funds budgeted for Monster Road' and the load limit will continue on Wells Ave. Bridge, Engineer suggestion that it be 'doted , is being investigated. • OF i A �� P "4•1a ° THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 if2: a 3...i BARBARA'. Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR ® LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER , co-0 p Q FRED J. KAUFMAN, 235-2593 9�TFD SEPI ��� July 18, 1980 Mr. James S. Fitzgerald P.O. Box L Kirkland, WA 98033 RE: File No. R-037-80; May Creek Associates, Request for Rezone. Dear Mr. Fitzgerald: The referenced rezone request was approved by the Renton City Council on July 14, 1980 by adoption of Ordinance No. 3446. Sincerely, Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department ✓City Clerk LID CIS1f C of R.E`eVTGK , LERK 1 'S OI C4 • CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 3446 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM GENERAL CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT (G-9600) TO RESIDENCE DISTRICT (R-2) R-037-80 (MAY CREEK ASSOCIATES) WHEREAS under Chapter 7, Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance. No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton", as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as General Classification (G-9600); and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Planning Department on or about April 2, 1980, which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about May 20, 1980, and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Residence District (R-2) as hereinbelow specified; subject to the findings, conclusions and decision dated June 2, 1980; the Planning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. (Said property being located at On Lake Washington Blvd. N.E. adjacent to and north of S.E. 76th Street) AND SUBJECT FURTHER to that certain Declaration of Restrictive Covenants executed by Petitioner-owners on or about June 23 , 1980 and recorded in the office of the Director of Records and Elections, Receiving No. 8006230422 and which said Covenants are hereby incorporated and made a part hereof as if fully set forth. SECTION II: This. Ordinance shall be effective upon itS passage, approval and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, this 14thday .of July, 1980. • C�• 7tte De ores A. Mead, City ' rk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 14th day of July, 1980. e nbr,�w . SktiocAld Barbara Y.Shinpochayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warr , City Attorney Date of Publication: July 23, 1980 I . a 4 EXHIBIT "A May Creek Associates R-037-80 Tract 181 , C.D. Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden Addition to Seattle, Division No. 3, according to the Plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 81 , in King County, Washington, lying southeasterly of the southeast margin of LakeWashington Boulevard Northeast (Kennydale Newport Road) ; together with that portion of vacated County Road NO. 34 lying westerily of the following described line: Beginning at the southeast corner of said Tract 181 ; thence northerly along the easterly line of said tract 181 , to the southwesterly line of said vacated County Road No. 34; thence continuing northerly along the last described line extended to a point of inter- section with the southeasterly margin of Lake Washington Boulevard Northeast (Kennydale Newport Road) and the terminus of said line. . .. . olignd • Igvrio/-Dricifici -eibm , . 08-1E0.4s, 1 riop_x7evpgwc--- i 5Sa.91# Akiw . `ifel- :JA . Sa-Lbfi.79f/.>/ 11 rl ii\I )•)-,Igt.11_gd I I-I-d H • l'Ile) ivIvvo - #3 ilriv\i Ai-isiN4 lAj11611A1 -d IN . ( .1, No'd ,-91 II iR_vrAprivv\i_jiAi jiniAl A j..igN A01--d 1 Aucriaiii Ai\vi--i - tH . .1 All VI`v"d 1--ON I -.d c . . 1V.spdNi )..1-1-911 .. ii • . . -3 ,1pe-ii--oive- v ,, • . . . . 3---c7p . a-57 ...5NL,Lcix.1 • • . ...... • . ,ill 4.8 1 .1.4..I0 iwv • -, ,..., . . 18R§' 6,0414 i,,, 't•s• ' ea .,•• . ; 1.e.k)..! • 64 1L„, , 1.14i ca . . .,, ._ ..... ..... • ) 7 .' .„ :"••••. „ "1.,7,1 Ca Ca b ,,, M 4.1 . . •• ..K. ',. F's4''• e -.t-4.k 0 0 1d,•': A i' 0;4" 1 c.x 0 • , • ,c,.4g. er,IN, - 1•44(1.ii- i '•-•CL ..-,4,....il, 41•••••••• ..----.--....„r,.. ar•i 2e,„„, . .....- . • c ..1,.,:4 2 . ' •• E.-1.)2Lia.ti y c" z • • ,-- LLI . ....--•'IC ' • ...•-"" NI CC • - ...r '• ? ,.:,,4',.`*,•,,,,i4.t i. 1.t,,I.I.1,.1,•„.• 1 01. 1 ....-• ,l,,. ,.•,.,! •,,,I,I.A.;tri.,,to4,z;•.ititsV:sr,,,: 1. k••,..... • ' , s..t.'•••••',.........:: :1'.?I''..4.,•`tC'40...::*.•,'.••.'. ,1••- . o ,. . . .... -.. , „..... .,..,. — ..., . ' Wikalh ••••.,),41,..to 1..;IP..4'0 , ‘11"Ci ;'I.. ,'. :..,:i,• "4:1:e.:14,,,4;1144:,,.. ..14i ‘1.,161,1•,:!..0.‘4.?. •.;:itilj:1•:1-':1:1.1 Lt.10::‘,y.4.`ct!,:), ,, '. ' ::.0;;',1..?;'t',ill .F.i!a,\it4S,att:C;:3 iA,. '1 .. • tki. Ap, 4,r''ff'.crt '•k' .f 4/qA.L , • ' ' 'y'' ''Vat 46'0 '` '''f.;. '14 Z6 .,„ it,k.0,..1.4p,• i• • • Ini ,,;., , ,. •r,i•%_.,4,- -1:Y,, ., .,53r,..--.,;:itit,I., ' VI ..,, A9.V7"(''T:,..'"1:f.:::*ltrt,-Z::'::P'c'',..1.,,,;:'t;Vlridt.'.:t.",1:: 'x',:tto .*'' .i.., 'qq;,,,AVI- 1,:k„ •.A.,('1 ',4'0'44.,,Lr 1 ..,.A . ,,,.,,,•44,-;y .i.; • . 114/.9 4 • . • 1 1 •0,,••. • ..•• •4,. .,..: Via& r - i .... . , 4 4'4* • k •, ' -3- /.. r.1/4. .4.;.•• -1 ... ,1,- /4..,•-,/ - . •$. ,,,,• • r •A :yriiiv; , ,t.3....0 1, . ,,, ,ft:st-AI . 440411 - A , . . . ,, A - , :114 . - .:-' .' .. .-1 p f. ', 4.11..„,t• •.: .;.Q•i•. :1•;16•qt;r ,' 1••,,f-: .4 - *410 r 1:61f- ,c J !1•• .4, '''." ''i.';'`31' ,•• 2:l'i•:.i••` it ,i-i tt,4 •-,•r•,, 4, ) 41,;.,15" •Al. ,s....!,1,_4;kii,,.,,. 'W.,. ' t , ,.„.r.r .i.„1 0„,-1......:Iv . 5,, . -;,:.,,,...4 ,,,....,44.xv: ,o ,!.,,,,i.:.-.51., , .,,..1 , .p. i 1 It.:'"•11T/..., t'-, a • • . '':•'i", •• •A ", 4:,..11; ,,,,i' i 1 ..,.*,,,,,,, . .,,, 41/4,4,...,(4 .. At_ s . 4,,A,,,,,.,4.1,41. 131 kV, "t'....'". !If" '•.... * st`;400, ' All,', -..,, •, ,1V' : .) ' 4 t Hltri 1 4,..7,14,,,, .T.4,..-i.,114. P 0 Af,t,•.,•-•,, tr,•-• k - - --- ,,,,:c.,-,.../.,,, Air;•440,100:.•.'.. ' ••,,0-' .- •-. • - - • , -.. x,,., .i.--•tri);L):. --( gisc,i., t ,..k(4.,.'. 844414444414040.. , •/ :1 ' N XII• •,. ) " • •' ;i...4'03,102,168-**''''t < . tt.* - '1/2;04•%•,1,*. • 4-'-'. .e. , -r.,,- , • ,,,... 44" 1.1,,, to• l'" 7, '.,:: , Ea li. . i.,,....t.„,„... . ".„,..t — „. . A•1 v"ir4 .$•,-,,• •-iot. , ''''1., . ,I,' .t,4 111. Va • . .../‘3A " - ta .2/ s ..,i, , e•e•''. ;• lir $' V , ,, .,',--1, u) CI) • ' • . ,., .,;,:7,,•„ .•••• 14V,•t., . • ' 4. ..`,?4,r" i, 0 ;-' .), , ik• •'"' • .•" INIINs1 •:.•11.:', NO - . •t-t ty.;-,•••„1,t, .4' r'‘ •li 1 4131.40 • 'Vb..' ‘ e, , ••••••,•,,,, .ilili. .. , , 4:,, 04 '''''.4.4.4.-e 0,..7:. ';'ill'' .-:. '';' 4) V:a " '4 ...,. .... . .., .:.,....,.., T.,... .1.,,,,,.4..!....... 4.7.• •• S3 .............._. ImH7::::ze.'41...,..14.:,..ii:i."....,iii,,i.,:::....:,.„.'..:1'.'1,', .., •Ar.4_,„ 0, --s;,..,,5:,,,,I.. i, „, ,, -'17..1i,7.,: ;ti P3A., '',- I ., - ,•, "My,. .4.-" ,••.- ?,,, . ' . il b;'".17_a•401.1 `.,v,-. . .. —--- -v'• -• i •-•-, --41,-'17: it ii.., , , . ,.. , .4, •••.. . ••••:, •1-••. ••• •,,v,•• `-•i US NU -',, " , ' '-'..,. i'''''.,..,„ .''"-.4 us us ,,2'.',,.$•:,.W.•.;4••,•.!'•a'.4 uj 1 ; •ts ,. .•,•,0•••,.i.t4 4.• w,tre., ,, , ;Lt. ,.• „ ..c..•-•%; .".0.0•111.•',4, ••..... ,, , - 74";;;:'''A ' . ''''-''2:.-• 's ..'”',,, , "''''•••::• .4-- Zt ,„ .,,,,, CO .; '4,i?4,- ' , .1,.., ',I . ,, .`'"' ... I. . • I ..• „A , • A, '''''''' " .A. 4• sA., , ...,.,..,A1,.'A...t.•.14,..0.:;,:11.1i,?..? 4...V rteir,,,r il•iV , I • f''''46•\.t;i.,IV 4:0;3! ''14*•I ' .:. •.4.•je•if I..4.f,,,„6. • 1 1,41 . . •:..... ''*--,-..,., . r.&'4'64/ 7p .' *, -.1/4,,..„. ., ,.,... -‘1,4kil • ,. .00/ 7-3.'0 • • 4 4- 4 ii.• 'ittv,. , •i. 4,,izt • .-1,',!,vs' -'1 .r. •'.. 1.41,!,,'Ail;, -- ''."‘. .°..-2._-j'.it_fg..e._1•1.1.1.tt.._6 _. 14.7:1.:'11. -__;•___:";__ ,:. 0., • , • •-• .,.ii,l,„... ., '-•.. 4:it,211 ,,,,' 4 '4. 1.11,P,il,:-.L:.*.k--...' -, - t"! \ AC!)..1- 'F,041,16het•:•: 4 - - •allippri•-,P6- ' Ah. tot. ''''•°4.47 )V*''''''..)?,!"•••041•.'''''''Y' t '„. • • ‘v.-- . ..,:.:•••.•''"•,'.1.''.•'• 4 i, ,,,,,,k. ,:.,.;,,1 v kqji.'41i'lliik•I r'.. ••• , .••:?t,o73.p.,4.,,: . .,iy.,.!.. ,,, .... / ' :,..,.., ,. ','•:=,,,a4,7,4, - ` I ',,L. :. '.."., ,. „ ..,,,,,)..,...:,. ..!.;:',;•..• :;1,,,,•1,,:44i-J.,,., •41!IX Attilt AV '‘. 0. •,,,..,.,/, ,y ' •l ',' J e •••',„ . Jtr .‘•. . •,te;u::, '' ' • •'.,, A ••-v•V ' ;1., '• ''"N.'t: ' +•%:•• ,''e,,k...t,v •‘•'••!••. '•.•• •'' .•...„ 'It. 1,4%1'qv,44.1. * IL j•k• ., ..'. k.:,LY '',q,,, ',F.,:.i;i.,;(K1',,'b ,,,,•t• ,,,,,,. ,:„, •',,r;,;§,.,. • *.i,'0 t ' 4/4 0)1; ,,t..,.. ' •' .:'•1:i'f''''44'''''''',:kA)'•.'..t.• k '"..;••• ...),':';( .: , .,. ,...1 4;4.4•41..4 , . '1‘..1;fil.,...;:t.:,•\, 't•-• ,, , • • •,,.'• .i ,',• _ .,•,,, .,-, '1` • i Vi ii.W ,•','''t$'1,.. • -., ''-','..v:';'."'',-,;,.. '''...,','.'•,' I ''.' I:' ',,'','...'.. '441:-. ••••'. gai t'f, 1.0 1,11 1.`TlIc Vh1.1.:, pz,:. t A yill )••• • 14, my, •• • !;!-•-...:,.. • ." •. a -••1;.;,...'•,••••••••,.•:•• , .. ,..,.k.;'),.4,0i0,:.•,••i.•:,...•;,:,:, ,... • • • • •.- Lid, ''.11'.:...,:.;_.....„„•,;',,..,..'i,.. ••.,..- .tc,.... .soc.,„..4 k. i••''. . . "'''•f1";..'•::I...•,'.•.. A....V.;. 1..."171•1 •::,'1( . ') • .. '''• .. • ... ru...:1 k...,L.,. ...Iiii..p,li • -V) '. .ti".:.: •..^ • i..•!: 'i`,",4; fP),...":49:'-'1.,`‘^ iilitiii .• . • • •••v ' , '•.,.,.•,,• , 0..., 1 e N,4.4.,r),Ogi..,c.:,0,1't., - -A,-, 6" '.4"13 cb -........... ,,,. . ....i‘A.•..,,,,,C..; ?,;i.,.-41111..4..'10.... ,., ‘1 ,1 4,t•S'...ty if..17.1.. 1, ., tPcstc. . ";.n, '.1:':A" •‘4.!W.:N. 1:%;q4W4 , .' , s .• ii.1 ‘.. ...;, ..30. 'N' Ti:10 41,.....1't L•b.• - v., .:•;,...'ir•,,,,,,,,,,•,1•,..,t,f'Oit:,7-.....yi-,-, ,,'''•, ''''•• '') di ' ,t,..':41 i'' .1 ',.4e,AA '.‘5.,g''Eirlia.k' .6 • ''i•: ', P.,.i''i"I'''''''1 AP'1",:. '":IrTItY ' ' '''..'. ,,:-' '.„A„••••11v•.;',•''',6,,.._•... _. 4'°' . ' , ' 1.1.!kk_ist.m.im,-,i,...,..:. .,... :„•?...1.,.111:."si.•,'•4.••=4/:•••4,•• • •-•.... .•• •..' , - May Creek Associates File No. 1 R-037-80 DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, Frank C. Rice and his wife Glenna B. Rice, Dale F. Hollister and his wife Elsie M. Hollister, and Norman W. McCue, a single man, are the owners of the ,. following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: Tract 181 , C.D. Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden Addition to Seattle, 1 .N Division No. 3, according to the Plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats , page 81 , in King County, Washington, lying southeasterly of the southeast margin -`.') "ct of Lake Washington Boulevard Northeast (Kennydale Newport Road) ; together with that portion of vacated County Road No. 34 described as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of. said Tract 181 ; thence northerly along the easterly line of said tract 181 , to the southwesterly line of said CD vacated County Road No. 34; thence continuing northerly along the last COdescribed line extended to a point of intersection with the southeasterly 4:1 margin of Lake Washington Boulevard Northeast (Kennydale Newport Road) and the terminus of said line. WHEREAS, the owners of said described property, hereinafter "the property," desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the .land as to use, present and future, of the property; NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs and assigns, as follows: RESTRICTION OF HEIGHT No building or structure developed on the property shall exceed a height of twenty- five (25) feet. SETBACKS Pursuant to the City of Renton Zoning Ordinance, a twenty-five (25) foot rear yard setback shall be maintained along the eastern property line; and a twenty (20) foot front yard setback shall be maintained along the western property line adjacent to Lake Washington Boulevard Northeast. , DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31 , 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation. Proper legal proceduresin the. Superior Court of King County may be instigated by either the City of Renton o.r any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants. Reasonable attorneys ' fees incurred during an enforcement proceedingiwill be borne by the parties whom the court determines are in error and shall be entered as a judgment in such action. ~I Dale F. Hollister ank C. Rice r / _ `�/` /� `, fir, Sit ?'�.;r?! J � Glenn B. Rice Elsie M. Hollister ' or n W. McCue _ • • STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING } On this day of t_, ,_ 195� , before me personally appeared r r G L -r-w,ii' j ; A iu-6 ;2'c.' /-c, . /Y•I Q. tc- Y7 ,. (0Ll-4am7`64 the persons who executed.,the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said persons for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. nzi CD IT WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal C`) CV the day and year first above written. O CO 1; Notary Public /i(',and for the State of Washington, r'esiding in ,fie' c:t:s '�- THE CITY CLERK—..*...dog - r'iU�iClz'�L 'r=.D.�:.� 7uTIi 9ns.r+srw.• A • • If FROM: CITY CLERK DATE: TO: 6 .(94„,,,,, ,, , ATTACHED IS:!?- 0 3 7 - 6-trt (2_1,L FOR: Jp)F1 vv7 ra RETUUN FILE rIDO 1S8U C I T By R.- 0 37-88 . S. Renton City Council 6/23/8¢. . Page 5 AUDIENCE COMMENT Mary Nybaum, 8Q2. 1100. Place, inquired regarding Agenda item; May Creek Associates Rezone 037-80, property located on Lake Washington Blvd. NE at SE 76th St. Council .Members invited Mrs. Nybaum to the Ways and Means Committee meeting 7/7/80 at 7:00 p.m. where the rezone ordinance would be discussed for presentation to the Council. The area was also pairfted. out .on the wall map. ADJOURNMENT There being no further .business. to come- beforelthe Council , it was MOVED BY REED, SECOND SHANE, COUNCIL MEETING ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 9:47 p.m. . ��� 74 42 at • Delores A. Me ,i CJM.!.C. City Clerk i!MD TABULATION SHEET PR® J EC T • Construction of Tennis Courts-Tiffany Park 6 Talbot Hill DAB"E. : Reservoir June 18, 1980 BIDDER BID Fryer-Knowles, Inc. Base Bid $53,800.00 • 205 S. Dawson Tax 2,851.40 Seattle, WA 98108 ' AA, BB, EEO TOTAL $56,651.40 • Porter Construction Co., Inc. Base Bid $64,210.00 3010 Meridian Ct. No. Tax 3,409.55 Puyallup, WA 98371 AA, BB, EEO TOTAL $67,619.55 • • • • • . . N00 EKP111 35 ' CITY OF. RENTON DATE' 6/23/80 WARRANT 'DISTRISUTION FUND TOTALS WARRANTS MACHINE VOIDS: 'N0.28820 - No.28824 CURRENT' • 10141,907.73• PARKS. 630967959 ARTERIAL. STREETS $5,518.73 STREETS •41, 141 .59 LIBRARY •3,027.33 COMP EMP TR ACT $492908 STREET FORWARD THRUST 613, 073912 L WASH. BCH. FWD THRUST *39, 111 .27 SENIOR CIT CENTER CONSTR •3, 1'E1, .46' WATERWORKS UTILITY 6112, 176.41 AIRPORT S3,370.21 8975 W 8, 8 CONSTRUCTION •170, L66e88. EQUIPMENT RENTAL •4,1127.21 FIREMEN 'S PENSION • •21,818936, UNEMPLOYMENT, COMR• 62,050.41 TOTAL OF' ALL. WARRANTS 6596, 170938 WE, THE UNDERSIGNED MEMBERS OF THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE OF: THE RENTON CITY COUNCILy HAVIN5' RECEIVED DEPARTMENTAL CERTIFICATION THAT MERCHANDISE AND/OR SERVICES' HAVE BEEN RECEIVED OR RENDERED, DO HEREBY APPROVE'. FOR PAYMENT VOUCHERS NO. 28825 THROUGH NO. 29038 IN THE' AMOUNT OF; •696, 170.38 I IS 23R0: DAY OF DUNE: 1980. gL. � COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN MEMBER MEMBER - - - - *: 03 2' 125 410410 Renton City Council 6/23/80 . Page 2 AUDIENCE COMMENT Helen Ivanich, 2907 Park Ave. N. , submitted a petition asking Alley Vacation Council to add the names of those parties that did not sign VAC-1-80 petition for vacation of alley between Burnett Ave. N and Park Ave. N between N 30th St. and N 29th St. , so that the entire alley could be vacated. Ways and Means Committee Chair- man Clymer explained the ordinance would be presented for first reading for vacation of the alley as presented lin the petition from Eugene Casper (without six easterly lots included) . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, COUNCIL ALLOW FILING OF PETITION FOR VACATION OF REMAINING PORTION OF ALLEY BY OWNERS OF THE SIX PARCELS IF THEY SO DESIRE, AND FEE- BE WAIVED. S. Carpenter, 9213 Park N, asked that owners of the six omitted properties be allowed to join with original petition; and the need for a new petition was explained. MOTION CARRIED. (See following items Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a committee Committee report recommending first reading of an ordinance vacating a First Reading portion of alley between Burnett Ave. N. & Park Ave N between Alley Vacation N 30th St. and N 29th St. (VAC-1-80) per Casper petition. Ordinance MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE, CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Following reading of the ordinance, MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE, REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEEFOR TWO WEEKS. CARRIED. Upon further inquiry from Mrs. Ivanichh regarding petition for vacation of remainder of alley, City Attorney Warren advised proper form should be obtained from the Public Works Department. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are adopted by one motion which follows the business matters included therein: Street Vacation Letter from the Public Works Department presented a petition Portion NE 12th for street vacation of a portion of NE 12th St. which was a VAC-6-80 deadend, rounded cul-de-sac street. The street as been opened and continued as thorough-fare and the rounded portion of cul-de-sac is no longer necessary for roadway purposes; needs to be vacated City Initiated to the abutting City property for surplus and sale with portion of the public use area in Block 46 corrected plat of the Renton Highlands No. 2. Refer to Ways and Means Committee for resolution setting hearing date of 8/11/80 and to Board of Public Works. Highlands Public Letter from Parks Department requested a resolution declaring Use Area Tract 46, Lot 2, Highlands Public Use Area, as surplus. Money Surplus received from the sale will be credited to Park Acquisition Fund. Refer to the Ways and Means Committee for resolution declaring subject area surplus. (Above vacation of portion of NE 12th Street abuts subject property to be declared surplus. ) Project Completion Letter from Planning Department reported completlion and accep- Senior Center tance of the Senior Center Project CAG 052-78, Calhoun Construc- tion Co. , Inc. and recommended Council accept completion of the contract 6/23/80 and final payment of $3,521 .46 to the contractor. The letter also recommended start of 30-day lien period for release of retained amount to the contractor upon receipt of required documentation. The letter also reported additional items beyond noted contract when Block Grant funds become avail- able. Council concur in recommendation. Bid Opening City Clerk reported Call for Bids 6/18 construction of tennis courts at Tiffany Park and Talbot Hill Reservoir. Two bids were received. Refer to Park Board. (See following,' award.) Tennis Courts Letter from the Park Dept. recommended acceptance of low bid for tennis court construction per Park Board recommendation of Fryer-Knowles, Inc. in the amount of $56,651 .401. (See above) Council concur. May Creek Assoc. Letter from Hearing Examiner Kaufman recommended approval with Rezone R-037-80 restrictive covenants of rezone requested by May Creek Associates from G-9600 to R-2 for the purpose of future townhouse develop- ment; property located on Lake Washington Blvd.' NE at SE 76th. Refer to the Ways and Means .Committee for ordinance. 410411 RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting June 23 , 1980 Municipal Building Monday , 8 : 00 P .M . Council Chabers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance .o the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council .o order. ROLL CALL OF THOMAS W. TRIMM, Council President; EARL CLYMER, ROBERT HUGHES, COUNCIL RANDALL ROCKHILL, RICHARD M. STREDICKE, JOHN REED AND C ARLES F. SHANE. CITY OFFICIALS BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Mayor; . DEL MEAD, City Clerk; LAWRE CE IN ATTENDANCE WARREN, City Attorney; MICHAEL PARNESS, Administrative assistant; RICHARD .HOUGHTON, Public Works Dept. ; .RAY CALDWELL, P•lice Department; JOHN WEBLEY, Parks and Recreation Director. MINUTE APPROVAL Council Minutes of June 16, 1980. Councilman Rockhill equested correction Page 3, Street Vacation VAC-1-80: Eric Grin.eland and his attorney Mr. Holman, discussed letter and vacation before the Council meeting with City Attorney and chose not to remain at meeting (did not attend Ways and Means Committee meet- ing) . MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND CLYMER, ADOPT THE MINUTES AS CORRECTED. CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been •sted, Street Vacation 'published and mailed as required by law, Mayor Shinpoch .pened Pelly Place N. the public hearing to consider vacation of;south. portion of Pelly VAC-2-80 Place North having a width of 50' and located south of l .ts No. 38 and 29 of Eldon Acres, as petitioned by- Steve Harer, Property Manager of Lake Terrace Associates. Letter from Board o Public Works Chairman Gonnason reported the Board finds no obje tion to the vacation as street is not necessary for the City'. traffic circulation, however, it is necessary to retain utility easement as sanitary sewer line and telephone ca• le are located in the right-of-way. The letter recommended the City charge a fee equal to one-half of the appraised value which the Board recommended be set at $2.80 per sq. ft. Lette from the Public Works Department reported petition valid and epre- sented 100% of the total property to be vacated. Public Works Engineer Houghton used map to point out street vacation and noted information received that Lake. Terrace Associates :re not owners of one abutting parcel , but are i.n the proces. of purchasing; however, represent 75%°of abutting property only 2/3 approval required by law). Continued Persons present making inquiries: Dick Beltz, 1221 N 27 h, asked re property division, zoning and access. City Attorney arren advised that the street right-of-way is divided with one half to each abutting owner, that the zoning does not change .•ut becomes that of the abutting property, in• this case bein. T Zone on west and G-6000 on the east. Bill Heath, 1303 N 26th area property owner, inquired regarding zoning. Helen Shook, 1405 N 24th, noted topography and feared excavation of hillside at the vacation site would cause damage to property above a the top of steep hillside; also inquired re possible landloc ing. Engineer Houghton used map to show access and no landloc ing. Attorney advised excavation would be future matter requi ing permits and approval from the City. Steve Harer, Lake T rrace Assoc. , 11326 Rainier Ave. S. , Seattle, reported no plan to excavate, that property would be used for placement o trailers; also noted that northeastern parcel was recent y purchased from Thomas _Cook but do-own 'M abutting grope ty. The requirement was noted that all fees be paid prior to ado•tion of vacation ordinance.. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND SHANE, CLO•E THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. Moved by Shane, Second Hughes vacate the street and charge 1/2 of appraised value. SUBSTITUT MOTION BY ROCKHILL, SECOND CLYMER, VACATE THAT PORTION OF PELLY PLACE NORTH, ACCEPTING. THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD OF PUB IC WORKS, RETAINING EASEMENT AND CHARGING ONE-HALF THE APPRISED Vacation VALUE. CARRIED. MOVED BY TRiMM, SECOND REED, REFER THE MATTER Approved TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Time: 9:27 ..m. For .use By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # � -fz-- AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING = ==a= = SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. Land Use Hearing Examiner For Agenda Of 6-23-80 (Meeting Date) Staff Contact Marilyn Petersen (Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: File No. R-037-80; May Creek Consent X Associates Request for Rezone Public Hearing Correspondence Ordinance/Resolution X Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc. )Attach New Business Study Session A. Examiner's Report, 6-2-80 Other B. Approval : C. Legal Dept. Yes No N/A X COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Approval Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A X • Other Clearance subject to restrictive covenants FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) (Attach additional pages if necessary.) The recommendation of the Hearing Examiner regarding the referenced rezone application was published on June 2, 1980, and an appeal period established to expire on June 16, 1980. The report is hereby forwarded to City Council members following the seven day period from the date of publication, and will be scheduled on the City Council agenda for June 23, 1980 (unless reconsidered or appealed) for referral to Ways and Means Committee for preparation of an ordinance. 1 PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: See page 6 of the Examiner's Report. SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. OF R4,4,sA IP 4$ o ° THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o ° BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9'0 `O FRED J. KAUFMAN, 235-2593 1! 09gTFD SEP100 June 18, 1980 Mr. James S. Fitzgerald P.O. Box L Kirkland, WA 98033 RE: File No. R-037-80;, May Creek Associates, Request for Rezone. Dear Mr. Fitzgerald: This is to notify you that the Examiner's recommendation regarding the referenced application, dated June 2, 1980, has not been appealed within the specified period. Therefore, the published recommendation will be transmitted to the City Council this date for final approval . You will receive notification of final action by the City Council subsequent to adoption of the required ordinance. Sincerely, Fred J . Kau man Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk M Week Associates F lo. R-037-80 DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, Frank C. Rice and his wife Glenna B. Rice, Dale F. Hollister and his wife Elsie M. Hollister, and Norman W. McCue, a single man, are the owners of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: Tract 181 , C.D. Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden Addition to Seattle, Division No. 3, according to the Plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 81, in King County, Washington, lying southeasterly of the southeast margin of Lake Washington Boulevard Northeast (Kennydale Newport Road); together with that portion of vacated County Road No. 34 described as follows: • Beginning at the southeast corner of said Tract 181; thence northerly along the easterly line of said tract 181, to the southwesterly line of said vacated County Road No. 34; thence continuing northerly along the last described line extended to a point of intersection with the southeasterly. margin of Lake Washington Boulevard Northeast (Kennydale Newport Road) and the terminus of said line. WHEREAS, the owners of said described property, hereinafter "the property," desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the property; NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs and assigns, as follows: RESTRICTION OF HEIGHT No building or structure developed on the property shall exceed a height of twenty- five (25) feet. SETBACKS Pursuant to the City of Renton Zoning Ordinance, a twenty-five (25) foot rear yard setback shall be maintained along the eastern property line; and a twenty (20) foot front yard setback shall be maintained along the western property line adjacent to Lake Washington Boulevard Northeast. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation. Proper legal proceduresin the Superior Court of King County may be instigated by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants. Reasonable attorneys' fees incurred during an enforcement proceeding will be borne by the parties whom the court determines are in error and shall be entered as a judgment in such action. / Dale F. Iolllster ank C. Rice Elsie M. Hollister ,.Glenn B. Rice °man W. McCue STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING ) On this day of J . k., , 19_, before me personally appeared 1 i: t• l` i•! i � -� 1 / . t „ , . ,j) (' �.••ai [ 1 • / tI, -/ir [ L !r,• the persons who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said persons for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IT WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. !• ,'6 ((. , •1 Notary Public fin and for the State of Washington, residing in ,.1,: ,<<_,.; -2- Fc.-.-tee By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING saa 3sacc == SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. Land Use Hearing Examiner For Agenda Of 6-23-80 (Meeting Date) Staff Contact Marilyn Petersen (Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: File No. R-037-80; May Creek Consent X Associates Request for Rezone Public Hearing Correspondence Ordinance/Resolution X Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc.)Attach New Business Study Session A. Examiner's Report, 6-2-80 Other B. C. Approval : Legal Dept. Yes No N/A X COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Approval Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A X subiect to restrictive covenants Other Clearance FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount Appropriation- Budgeted $ Transfer Required $ SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) (Attach additional pages if necessary.) - The recommendation of the Hearing Examiner regarding the referenced rezone application was published on June 2., 1980, and an appeal period established to expire on June 16, 1980. The report is hereby forwarded to City Council members following the seven day period from the date of publication, and will be scheduled on the City Council agenda for June 23, 1980 (unless reconsidered or appealed) for referral to Ways and Means Committee for preparation of an ordinance. PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: See page 6 of the Examiner's Report. SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King ) Marilyn J. Petersen , being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 2nd day of June , 19 80 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. /11° Subscribed and sworn this A u day of A1/4.)Qe1 19 . \\,(M)0,<:11\ • Notary Public in and fort e State of Washington, residing at Renton • Application, Petition or Case: May Creek Associates; R-037-80 (The mLnutea contain a £.iet o6 the pattti,ea og necond) June 2, . 1980 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICANT: May Creek Associates FILE NO. R-037-80 LOCATION: On Lake Washington Boulevard N.E. adjacent to and north of S.E. 76th Street. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant requests a rezone of the subject site from G-9600 to R-2 for the purpose of future townhouse development . The. final development is anticipated to provide 26 condominium units. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval with restrictive covenants. RECOMMENDATION: Hearing Examiner: Approval with restrictive covenants. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on May 15, 1980. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report , examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on May 20, 1980 at 9:23 a .m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report. Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, reviewed the report , and entered the following exhibits into the record: Exhibit #1 : Application File containing Planning Department report and other pertinent documents Exhibit #2: King County Assessor's Map Exhibit #3: Schematic Site Plan Exhibit #4: Cross Sectional Diagram Referencing Section 1 .5 of the Planning Department report , Mr. Blaylock corrected the number of anticipated traffic trips per day from 125 to 156. The Examiner informed the applicant that development of 26 duplex units on the subject site would require approval of a special permit by both the Examiner and the City Council in accordance with Section 4-708.2 of the Zoning Code. He also advised that Section 4-708 of the code requires a front yard setback of 20 feet and a rear yard setback of 25 feet. The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: James S. Fitzgerald P.O. Box L Kirkland, WA 98033 Responding to the Examiner's inquiry regarding concurrence in the Planning Department staff report, Mr. Fitzgerald indicated general concurrence with certain minor exceptions. He encouraged approval of the application, and noted that conditions recommended by the Planning Department would mitigate any adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood. Mr. Fitzgerald referenced a memorandum directed to the City of Renton from May Creek Associates, dated March 31 , 1980, which delineates supporting circumstances for approval of the request. The Examiner advised that the memorandum is included as part of the record in Exhibit #1 . Mr. Fitzgerald also requested that the previous rezone request, File No. R-217-78, be entered into the record by reference. He reviewed background of the previous request for an R-3 zoning designation which had been denied by the Hearing Examiner on October 19, 1978, and reconsidered on November 7, 1978 in response to a request for reconsideration by the applicant. Mr. Fitzgerald indicated that following the Examiner's approval of the request to reconsider, the Planning Department had determined the necessity of an environmental impact statement in consideration of the requested R-3 designation. Following receipt of this information, the applicant withdrew the application due to the undesirability of the R-037-80 Page Two expense and delay of an EIS review. However, the record indicates the Examiner 's opinion that R-2 zoning is appropriate on the subject site, he ,noted. Mr. Fitzgerald reviewed the three criteria denoted in Section 4-3014 of the Hearing Examiner Ordinance, one of which must be found to apply in order to recommend approval of a rezone, and advised that the applicant far exceeds the minimum requirement in : 11 three criteria: 1 ) That substantial evidence was presented demonstrating the subject reclas. ification appears not to have been specifically considered at the time of the last area land use analysis; Mr. Fitzgerald indicated that the zoning, G-9600, on the site has remained the same since annexation in 1960, and no specific con. ideration of reclassification of the property has occurred since that date. 2) That the property is potentially zoned for the reclassification being requested , pursuant to the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan; Mr. Fitzgerald noted that the Planning Department had found that the proposed rezone to R-3 was consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and because R-2 is a less in ensive use, it is clearly authorized by the plan. 3) That significant circumstances and changes have occurred in the area of he requested rezone since the last area wide land use analysis; Mr. Fitzge ald reviewed zoning changes in the immediate vicinity subsequent to annexation into the city, including reclassification of Parcels 184 and 193 from G-`600 to B-1 in 1969, and rezone of Parcel 185 from G-9600 to B-1 in 1970, properties immediately south of the subject site. He stated that across the freewa to the west, the site of Misty Cove Apartments was rezoned from G-6000 to R 4 in 1966, and the property to its immediate south apparently retained H-1 zo ing. Adjacent to the south and east of the subject site is county designated RM-1800, high density multifamily, property. On Parcel 183, a special permit was granted by the city in April , 1979 for fill and grade with plans of constructing a 100-unit motel complex on property due south of the freew-y interchange.. Mr. Fitzgerald noted that the above referenced changes are consistent with the city's Comprehensive Plan, which indicates commercial and business use of the area and medium density multifamily buffer in which the subject site is located around th= perimeter. He also advised that all utilities are available and in close proximity to the site, and improvement of Lake Washington Boulevard is scheduled on the Six-Y=ar Street Improvement Plan for installation of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, paving , d ainage and illumination, which will mitigate what minimal traffic increases would be generated by the project. Mr. Fitzgerald referenced several goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan which are met by the applicant in his proposal , including: 1 ) prevent blight by protecting residential and other exclusive districts from the unwarranted infiltration of incompatible uses which would contribute to premature decay and, obsolescence, and prevent the development of orderly growth patterns; 2) increase community livability by improving environmental fact.rs which are closely related to the residential districts and other community areas; 3) pr.tect property values within the community for the benefit of its residents and propert owners through the effective control of land use and the enforcement and application of Building and construction codes; 4) promote the development of a viable, progressive commu ity which provides ample opportunity for citizen participation in a broad spectrum of activites; and 5) encourage the development and utilization of land to its highest and best se in such a way as to promote the best interests of the community and contribute to it, overall attractiveness and desirability as a place in which to work, shop, live and play. Mr. Fitzgerald concluded that single family residential development is clearly no appropriate use of the property, development of low density multifamily dwellings will minimally impact the existing neighborhood, and will , in fact, provide a buffer t. the residents to the east and north to increase community livability. He noted that he proposed zoning is a logical extension for orderly growth in the area and achieve. the social and physical amenities envisioned by the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Fitzgerald indicated that the view from only one single family residence directly to the eas of the subject site would be impaired by the development, and the view is currently plocked by an existing knoll on the site. He also requested that the Hearing Examiner en er a finding that the proposed use is in compliance with all provisions and standards, and that the required special permit be granted pursuant to Section 4-708. The Examiner advised that his authority does not extend to approval of a request or special permit until proper application is made and the public hearing publicly a.vertised . Mr. Fitzgerald indicated that the applicant 's intent was clear in his request for 26 units on the subject site, and requested that the Examiner recommend that the special p-rmit be approved if it is determined possible. R-037-80 Page Three The Examiner requested testimony in support of the application. There was no response. He then invited comments in opposition. Responding was: Susan Rendahl 7805 113th S.E. Renton, WA 98055 Mrs. Rendahl referenced a letter and petition signed by property owners in the immediate vicinity of the subject site which had been submitted to the Examiner on May 19, 1980, and included in Exhibit #1 . She represented the residents in stating objections to development due to unstable soil conditions, inadequate roads, and existence of natural springs in the terrain. She advised that many residents in the area had constructed their homes on large parcels of land due to the instability of soil and the necessity to install provisions for drainage. Mrs. Rendahl referenced the Newcastle Community Plan, pages 10 through 15, which further delineates severe landslide potential in the area. She noted that although Lake Washington Boulevard is scheduled for improvement, its current condition would not accommodate traffic generated from the proposal as well as other property currently being developed in the vicinity. She felt that potential landslides which may occur as a 'result of the weight of the proposed development and removal of existing vegetation will also create hardships to the developer. The Examiner requested further comments in opposition. Responding was: June Huson 1130 S.E. 76th Renton, WA 98055 Ms . Huson was affirmed by the Examiner. She stated that her concern as the adjacent neighbor directly east of the subject site regards the method of construction and the proposed height of the structures which would obstruct the view from her residence. She noted that the site containing her combination residence/artist studio was selected because of its privacy and aesthetic location, and these aspects should be reviewed and considered prior to approval of a rezone of the subject property. The Examiner indicated that the submitted conceptual site plans are not binding upon the applicant at this stage of review, but the issue is whether the property is suitable for development of low density housing in an R-2 zone. Mr. Fitzgerald clarified that the site is relatively level in comparison with the steep hill directly to the east, and while the hill may have a landslide potential , the subject property levels out to a plateau. He advised that the Planning Department has analyzed the capability of the existing roads to accommodate additional traffic and has found that minimal impact will occur. Referencing Ms. Huson's testimony, Mr. Fitzgerald indicated that a substantial swath of vegetation currently blocks the view from the existing residence, and the applicant proposes to retain the trees along that eastern boundary of the site as well as along Lake Washington Boulevard. Ms. Huson clarified that the existing trees on the eastern boundary of the site are deciduous and provide a buffer from noise and light during the summer, but a view of the lake is enjoyed during the winter season. The Examiner requested final comments. Since there were none, the hearing regarding File No. R-037-80 was closed by the Examiner at 10: 17 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1 . The request is for approval of a reclassification of 2.52 acres of property from G-9600 (General ; Single Family Residential ; Minimum lot size - 9,600 square feet) to R-2 (Duplex Residential ; Minimum lot size - 7,200 square feet) . 2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Planning Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #1 . 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , R.C.W. 43.21 .C. , as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee, responsible official . 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. R-03/-o0 Page Four 5. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. 6. The subject property is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Lake Washington Boulevard and S.E. 76th Street . 7. The subject site was annexed into the city in 1960. A petition, filed in 1978, to reclassify the property to R-3 (Medium Density Multifamily) was denied by the Hearing Examiner and the request for reconsideration was dismissed in January of 19:0. 8. The site has varying slopes ranging from 6% in the north to 14% near the south property line along S.E. 76th Street. Runoff on the site is medium, and the erosion hazard is moderate to severe. Development plans for such slopes would be subject to review and approval of the Public Works Department. 9. The site is covered with dense ground cover and there are stands of deciduous trees. scattered throughout the site. 10. There are two existing single family dwellings and an accessory structure on the site. 11 . There are scattered single family residences located north and east of the subject site. A large apartment complex is under construction in King County south-ast of the subject site. South of the subject site, adjacent to S.E. 80th Street and Lake Washington Boulevard, a permit to allow fill and grade was approved within the last three months '(Sea-Belle Properties, File No. SP-402-79) . Similarly, a permit to fill and grade was approved in 1979 on Parcel 183 (File No. SP-321-79) to allow proposed construction of a motel complex. 12. Zoning in the areas adjacent to the subject property is a mix of residential, commercial and industrial . The residential consists of a mixture of G-9600, the subject site's current designation; G-6000 (General ; Single Family Residential ; Minimum log size - 6,000 square feet) northwest of the subject site; R-4 (High Density Multifa ily) to the west; and RM-1800 (King County High Density Multifamily) to the southeast. There are B-1 districts (Business/Commercial ) south of the subject site and a newly rezoned B-1 parcel southeast of the site. H-1 (Heavy Industry) zoning is located along the lake southwest of the subject site. 13. The site i,s located at the extreme north end of the city and lies adjacent o I-405. Lake Washington Boulevard, a major arterial , forms the western boundary of he subject site. Lake Washington Boulevard is scheduled for improvement under the Six Year Street Improvement Plan. Included improvements will be curbs', gutters, sidewalks, drainage and lighting. S.E. 76th Street, forming the southern boundary of the prope ty, beg'ins climbing off of Lake Washington Boulevard and is underlain by springs in the area. 14. The Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject ,property is located as suitable for the development of medium density multifamily housing. The R-• designation is generally consistent with low density multifamily .housing. 15. The previously denied rezone to\ R-3 was disapproved as premature and incomp-tible with the surrounding development. The Hearing Examiner indicated that R-2 4oning would be more compatible with surrounding uses. 16. The 2.52 acre (109,771 square feet) lot as zoned would permit approximately eight to ten 'single family homes if the parcel were subdivided. The proposed zoning of R-2, without subdivision or special permit, would permit the establishment of on= duplex unit. Routine subdivision, if approved, would permit the establishment of -pproximately 12 duplex units on 7,200 square foot lots. A special permit with City Coun• il approval would allow the establishment of up to 27 townhouse units on the subject property. 17. The applicant has submitted a conceptual site plan which indicates that the applicant intends to proceed by special permit and proposes to establish 26 units on 'he subject property. The plans are conceptual and do not bind the applicant to those -pecific plans. 18. The maximum development of the subject site under the proposed reclassifica' ion would permit the establishment of approximately 27 units which would have the pot:ntial of increasing the number of residents by approximately 68 persons; the school .ge population by approximately six students; and the number of vehicle trips b approximately 162 trips per day. 19. The legal notification indicated only that a rezone request was to be heard on May 20, 1980. There was no indication in that notice that a special permit to establish townhouses would be .heard at the hearing. 20. The establishment of the permitted duplex structures on the subject site ha the potential to block the views of adjacent property to the east . The Plannin'� Department R-03, .;O Page Five recommended that the height of the future structures be limited to 25 feet in order to mitigate the impact of the greater intensity duplex development on the adjoining single family properties. Similarly, the Planning Department recommended buffering these properties to the east with at least a 20-foot setback requirement. Section 4-708(4) (b) requires a minimum 25-foot rear yard. Depending on the designated frontage of the property, the rear yard could either be along the north or east property lines of the property. CONCLUSIONS: 1 . The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest and will not impair the public health, safety and welfare in addition to compliance with at least one of the three criteria listed in Section 4-3010 which provides in part that: a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area-wide rezone or land use analysis; or b. The subject site is potentially designated for the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan; or c. There has been material and substantial change in the circumstances in the area in which the subject site is located since the last rezoning of the property or area. The applicant has demonstrated that the necessary criteria have been met to permit the reclassification of the subject property. 2. The Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of medium density multifamily housing. The applicant . has proposed low density multifamily zoning for the subject property in order to create a less intense buffer between the single family housing directly north and east of the subject site and the higher intensity development and 1-405 west of the site. 3. In a previous application and respective analysis, the Hearing Examiner indicated that R-3 zoning was too intense for the subject site but that R-2 zoning with certain restrictions could be made compatible with the site and surrounding development. The applicant's proposal as conditioned below will permit such integration of the proposed R-2 zoning and the adjacent single family areas to the north and east. 4. The R-2 zoning requested by the applicant is generally more compatible with the surrounding zoning and development than that suggested by the map element of the Comprehensive Plan. The R-2 would be less intense and would prevent the intrusion of incompatible land uses into the area in which the subject property is located (Page 17, Comprehensive Plan, Objective No. 1) . The R-2 zoning would also protect property values within the community through effective control of land use ( Ibid, Objective No. 4) . The textural guidelines of the Comprehensive Plan along with sound land use principles support R-2 zoning rather than the more intense R-3 zoning. 5. A number of the parcels which are compatible with the zoning of the subject site have been recently rezoned or been the object of further development procedures such as special permits for fill, and grade. These include the Pickle rezone, the rezones of Parcels 184, 185 and 193, all to B-l ; the Misty Cove rezone to R-4. The special permits to fill and grade were recently approved for Sea-Belle Properties and the Austin Company. The construction of the large apartment complex in King County just. south of the subject property has recently occurred. This 'indicates that the area has undergone significant and material changes in the recent past. 6. The proposed rezone is also compatible and consistent with the changes which have occurred in the area as enumerated above. Further, the proposed rezoned property will serve as a buffer between these more intense uses and the single family uses north and east of the subject property. 7. The topography of the subject property is irregular and unless specific concern and consideration is given to the topography, view blockage, noise and other physical encroachment will occur if development on the subject parcel proceeds under the .R-2 zoning. Therefore, in order to mitigate these problems, the imposition of a height limitation and setback buffer for development on the subject property is appropriate. The Planning Department has indicated that a 25-foot height limitation would protect the easterly properties from view blockage and the encroachment of the more intense R-2 property. Similarly, a 25-foot setback which would be required as a rear yard in the R-2 zone (Section 4-708(4) (b)) could also achieve the necessary separation and avoid the impacts of intense development along the east property line. , a R-037-80 Page Six 8. Pursuant to Section 4-708(4) (a) , a front yard of at least twenty feet is required in an R-2 zone and it would be appropriate to maintain that setback along Lake Washington Boulevard, a heavily traveled arterial . Also, maintaining the western property line as the front of the subject property would be consistent with designating the eastern edge of the property as the rear yard for setback and buffering requirements -s indicated above (Conclusion No. 7) . 9. The legal notice of a public hearing to consider a zone change on the subject property was insufficient to apprise the general public of a further hearing to permit the establishment of townhouses on the subject property pursuant to the special permit procedures of Sections 4-708(3) and 4-722(B) . Therefore, the applicant will be required to apply for a special permit under separate application and a public hearing will be held to determine the appropriateness of the request. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should approve the reclassification of the subject property from G-9600 to R-2 subject to the following restrictive covenants: 1 . That no building o,r structure exceed a height of twenty-five (25) feet; 2. That a twenty-five (25) foot rear yard setback be maintained along the eastern property line pursuant to Section 4-708(4) (b) ; 3. That a twenty foot (20) front yard setback be maintained along the western property line adjacent to Lake Washington Boulevard pursuant to Section 4-708(4) (a) . ORDERED THIS 2nd day of June, 1980. Fred J . Ka man Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 2nd day of June, 1980 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: James S. Fitzgerald, P.O.. Box L, Kirkland, WA 98033 Susan Rendahl , 7805 113th S.E. , Renton, WA 98055 June Huson, 1130 S.E. 76th, Renton, WA 98055 Jerald Slatter, 5032 Lake Washington Boulevard N.E. , Renton, WA 98055 Gloria Minnick, Renton Municipal Building Ken Powell , 5110 Lake Washington Boulevard N.E. , Renton, WA 98055 Ed LaVille, 3188 Sunset Boulevard N.E. , Renton, WA 98055 TRANSMITTED THIS 2nd day of June, 1980 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Michael Hanis, Planning Commission Chairman Ron Nelson, Building Division Lawrence J . Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before June 16, 1980. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record , take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 an meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall , or same maybe purchased at c st in said department. , isei, IN-111i116* G 4 . . • • 0.. ipli roe .' _ . -.14 . 634?, - • „, �.54 { � ! . ri a .,.. a r .r.'�••., y ....y r ., ti._ , ' • , • ti• ., , v +.L47 ` - : f • `�` fr� � d1 r t ,1 , + ' t:. T [a ` i . .. : y R {. '� .� . it * • a `` 1& .6 .4' .-;Z. 7. ' ;:-Ck eAlie7-4:4E:glj 1!tri,7tri 'W...ef:'fi%4 ' , • fl .Z II ' CC 624'''I: ESSZUMEI a iiii,T.., , --,.. R. . .,... 0,1iiimil- . • :,,is,t'41z.vog,v 4. ktot t.:, • ' , 1 7 ,..., Qp.,., ' ' , 3 ,,, ''. .• "„fib'.-* e y' ,-b :1", ti•.,f ! ` t)tSE ipolik ... l • 3:i.A. NTH • C , /l, #9ototie ."1"4•414.....e • , X: S • • v ,.. 114TH ;`4 T/� - • . ` 4•. �.r • SE a , a1A YI Om, '''‘411.:411: '`'.% fi, .". 5 .,�.• +t,• AV l' iih'i'i+.. jai: 4 tit i • y 1+1 •.f. a.l�i,a• .. A rFG\J.^A u, .. a .1 r . . . . . . .-.. - ., .,•I"Yt ' . • ' ... ", 1:•ti,1,4,:trio.1,;:•,,. . .••:,•,•;,.„....6„,.,•: •,,,k,., ,:.,,, "Mir "''., ..- ,•.',.' '. .` 4fft.....i cleNt .... b p . 70N - .., • . 7'� r — �- a Q�7.;.�i 7. • ���;.� 27 G-1 Z f.,T :i "•,. • { VW 1• �rti! •'. PI M r ' 121 ' S' s H : ExItIcAP . U3E c IC LPL LiRI✓ Li - Li&+-h' 1011L15-rKY S E- I1NIG-LE EAMI LY HI - I A\/Y i kipij5 R\K , L p-LOU/ f�[1SI`i Y MLI M r MAJI L EA�(LI RI & PARk MP- MWIl1M V * 11'Y M Lf C - OOM-MVIRC M' kI P- !G 1 D �i`.I 3I`1 Y MLl L . mny CRrEk/}SS®Crt4TES R-PAR fc_C E2Ar I Q IQ-037—so /QP_PJ5LIc/oL1/\51• PUBLIC . . . ... ,.:_. . • , • ___ _._______ . ______. • ., .• - . . s- ,.., f . ; . ---. i -; f ....‘ • :. , ....., .,4-. \:....,/, \ . . ; . , . - - -- -, • i - --...._.t • ' ( • •..--- • . - \'4.., .N.-___....' . .A. ----*., / . -, CO': (•( •i Lt...•..* .5-c-4/4)'' • __:.... • - ... — (.... 1---- or .- •.---"' C- ..-J--..:' ; • • , • ) `..--- / tal s -• • _ } ____ __ ___ ... . (...-., A .."- - . : - I "I.k--; • •.! i I • -,,/ -.--• --„ _s. ?. I i i l'...,..-- 4 ....,,, : - I 1 '1 1 .--',. or i . (4- I. ' . ".• - .!... ..7 ,., 1 .,‹. , 7 - 1 r3 ....r_ ‘.,:j-. k • : , A . i - • r---, • .- / i ./1, f . _ II i -1--)/ 1 4- Jk.....21,./ / ,,)‘• . r /7 / / _-. s-- --r :.; ....)'.N. • \, ,......., 1 .........'-' ---....._ t ______. , . . ----i 1 i ......-- ....___ . ---..., k,,,`7"-,::-.., , , •-.1 ----- ' //7---' , 4. 1..../1 _____ ,,..,....) - 4, c ' 4c, [0:, 1 / :7,6* /....cr .___...., 1 / '• e'L.V. ,. " - / ...„..., / i i ,..._-:. , :,- j,i U. ::'*l'-,-4;-‘'k ' si --..,-- 7 --- -- ---- I t) „-1 14 1 i . / --. , (....,... . • _.S1'.1.;,,, NNK N.,/‘NS .e'''' I ..°'' I ' / 17 .-- N,:..e.W..7...-‘7... , — .. /No. _ -- , /7.c. ;.._, 11 __ a•CD,..•••/ 4. -...._ ....4,..:) .,„...,.....s -..,. 1-4:..,,-;;:,..:t -- • isi-- __,.. t74- ----"4:-......-...--.•-•!-/ ,.... 4,--). , 4- -,-r ---. / - • - , . • Cr • *0 A„- -.. "i„E- -----..._ • • • ,,,-..• .. , • -'• ., /..--'s\ -,-"" -..._ 1 '"-• 1 --. .. ...._ :: • . 4? / / N \ ...._- \'`• --4; ---__ ____ _ ) // e--------.----, . ......... i ,>:-..ts,.., i 11' - . . ;• :74 • ....)'" 4---- C-' • •,- . / • 1 ......--, ---....,(71 -' •• // . / • .• .. i -,• 1:1- ti....•:--. ' . ..."'‘.- *5.7. Nyrast--f,.......\---, / Cr12 7 •.....• . .........- • (7\C-2. .,,•,•- •Ic.... .....,..:: , N , 23 `• ,..-./\---- _e.t.a=- , • . p.%14.1,. ft \ - C c n • a......-it ',17---- - 14.' '44- . % ' • ! 3.1•:..C......:, 7,, • ..: t.,...,•"..' (PROPOSED) 1,..v..?r-2 . ,.._.., ,: . •1 ",--- .. • . ;• -4,1-,...•= 7:4;MAY CHEEK ASSOCIATES . ' c4.7 LQ...i.) \ l.; • :: .741,. 1, dee!''..-, REZONE REQUEST: G 9 , 600 to R-2 , Residential Multip-le Family iz...%."- -•'.. ' .. F -Tr-i-4 AA-41-mA, se'i--ri,; 1 FILE NUMBER R-037-80 1/4. ..1 -1 ....1. '...,,; .1:.:... c....:.;.;.,....s r ..,_:.z...7.,s. - .." NNN ..,... • . \ ....P-'14 •:•"•.,\...5,-,.•". (1.7.•-;"... -7 . ? . ,',...,.... • •, ,-‘,... „.. ,. * .....,... i t .z...- I , f • .NN . 1 . Is.TS po .. May 15, 1980 RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAIViiNER Mr. Fred Kaufman MAY 1 91980 Land Use Hearing Examiner AM PM CITY OF RENTON 7a8a9al0,llal2a1c2a314t516 Municipal Building Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Rezone Application of May Creek Associates #R-037-80 Dear Mr. Kaufman: The undersigned parties to this letter wish to voice our firm objection to the proposed rezone of the subject property shown on the enclosed exhibit. We represent the immediate property owners and members of the community that would be most affected by the proposed intensification of the land use. We, for the most part, have been present at the other hearings concerning the proposed rezone of this parcel and made what we feel were very significant and important points as to our objections to situations which have not changed and will not change in the future. Our objections are based on the very principles of the County' s Comprehensive Plan that we as community members relied upon when we purchased or built our present homes . The subject property is steep and of seijere landslide potential (Newcastel Commu- nity Plan, pgs . 10 through 15) which causes the property owners on the upper adjacent property great concern. We also have a totally inadequate road system, in particular the steep hill known as S.E. 76th, which by the county's own admission is impossible to keep in good repair due to the unstable soil conditions and natural springs on the hillside. Related to this is an already overburdening traffic condition that has produced a serious accident potential on the very narrow existing roadways of which a further intensification would be intolerable. Although this property is in the City of Renton it is surrounded by, and adjacent to, land that is presently in the county whose land use is governed by the comprehensive plan currently in effect. There is adequate zoned property in the immediate vicinity that is undeveloped at present, in addition to development that has CITY OF RENTON/Fred Kaufman May 15, 1980 Page 2 taken place that will surely have an adverse impact on the traffic and overcrowding conditions already existing. We are very much opposed to increasing zoning that would allow a further deterioration of the immediate community. This parcel was denied a rezone at a previous hearing and since then the community has been able to review the Newcastle Commu- nity Plan which reconfirmed past studies indicating the extreme danger of soil instability on the subject property and the entire hillside area. The entire area is classified as a class III severe landslide hazard area. The very policies of King County Comprehensive Plan, which must be considered in this case, call for these areas of landslide potential to be left undeveloped or at the very most developed in a way to allow. for very low intensification of land use. Many of us in the community have built our homes on large parcels of an acre or more because of the soil tests and drainage problems, and secondly so that future problems associated with overdeveloping of this type of land would not occur. In summary, let us say that the undersigned members of the commu- nity are confident that the previous denial of the rezone was a correct decision and hope you will consider our objection, to this present rezone as valid and proper. We thank you for your consideration. Sincerely,. The Undersigned Neighborhood Property Owners Attachment: Signature Pages ) '.' -PROPERTY OWNER'S NA. . 0 ADDRESS . . 7(Ws----! i/3 s i , --1 ti7,6, ; et-n_ to.121 . • • .pg.i 4 A 6 76 /'4 )/- ie4iii ) • -., er,-,___7t_i; ‘.°-: ,c(15.e. ____&-__, • . .y zzAe_Li s4--, 7 --ex- /) . ' . - ; •h . / / . • wyl h7-,/, _g&„,, K . ..z,e /:„/.L._ ' - , . , If 2611 1/./ • --7 / 4 / ,'/ ' '-eZ- -4, - t .' ,e67-/7-0-'------ „ , • n // 5 .2 ‘ ,--e Yes t . /77 2/4_,A , ar; r) . .• ' 7A MA . 7tILL. i2,eacy. _5414--, 563z_ 1..k• 04 .. gi,lib. Ave 'REM TOO - tae.____iyAg. , 9.4. -4,4‹* , 2c 7 ,/,/ii.,x,/,;,, d/44 1-6-", • 7 "4., v 704-az, _e,,,,,,,z4ef.X, i,9-4,. ./, _67/6 ,‘, ., 21, ---TA , ., . . f ,,,,,•f.74,- , '-'4/-q • 'Y /714 . 4(/1 ',e- .141/7 ,-a-,(9'L___. It /,/. 2-& // ' - /.' • / 0,i1-(' ' ,A- 7.717;1Z1/1 1 ,,, ,67,./7ff . //,,,93.-- ,Sc 7/ ( . 6.7 • . ( . ,. . PROPERTY OWNER'S Nei ADDRESS 777,c_ v/>/74 je"-,-VA4// /42 7 7."1 -2'l01) , A 0 %,6.4 //, S- S e "241 -Q- ,-- J //z`vR 71XIZiever„-7 - `���-� ���� i ���L�� ��� ,�c� � � 2�-ems--- i/4,50 /4-21 //m, }.. - y. :�+. ,:.J;ii=:.lr: •:.1-: 'Xi:`5 .?ei='c+..•'.^`v3`sr'iT�'l4;Pr:rd�.�'.':':,:"J'7`t;J Alt... ,'1' �/ .�Y y,... Q .L1 K' ,,. - •a .0 tar',.` ..l i I'"1• jr� L�I rf �';1 ~+Y x. '1' +1�. nY 4+n 1 ••r .r �: rr . • I 1 r' R.... • . . . ..S-9,600 i .,, vs• •.. ...... • .. . .. , .... . . . 0 . . „. . . . . iv: . • k- S.E. 72nd. ST. .. '' ,, I I• 200.. ..Ia RSr9,600 f st • • ,6QQ RS•9 600 • RS-9 600 • • o • RS-9,600 , I RM- W •p 'n _ , .I y V r ai RS-9,600 s;;;--.• .. • t 29 tc a 2 ?Y j .1 .. . �' SE'- BO�r--$T�—' •— s 7. Bart, _ .- .-.S� .. .. -.. •._•�..-. .. 32 -s. • • • Qo• '‘.. \ S- • R S- 7 - �'., . . Lu • ) RS-9,600 j V!4.1 • • .i .83`ST. . W • _ N ;NTON ,,.�,NO • if S-R $T • SE 84TM sr-7—<1.1 s gE: W • —....,_... .._ a RS 9,60' • RS -0II1. RS-9,600 q ma's N ._. • . i A RS-9,600 • S-R S-o" _ • o, --_.. SE 186T Sr. RS-9,60 • �w `� n O � RS-9,600 1 Z il 1 __]° E. P • RS•900 9,6- ia � 1 \ RS-9800 hN$ 9, OOr• PLANNING ®EPA3 TIMEI1ff IPRELIIMIIMARY REPORT TO TIE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING MAY 20, 1980 APPLICANT : MAY CREEK ASSOCIATES FILE NUMBER : R-037-80 A . SUMMARY & IPU;"IPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant requests a rezone of the subject site from G-9600 to R-2 for the purpose of future townhouse development . The final development is anticipated to be 'a 26-unit condominium development . B . GENERAL ME®I I IATI®PM: 1 . Owner of Record : NORMAN McCUE for MAY CREEK ASSOCIATES 2 . Applicant : MAY CREEK ASSOCIATES 3 . Location : (Vicinity Map Attached ) On Lake Washington Blvd. N .E . adjacent to and north of S .E . 76th Street 4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Dept . 5 . Size of Property : +109, 771 square feet or 2 . 52 acres 6 . Access : Via S. E . 76th Street and Lake Washington Blvd. N .E. 7 . Existing Zoning : G-9600, Residential Single Family 8 . Exising Zoning in the Area : G-6000, Residence Single Family ; B-1 , Business Use ; R-4 , Residence Multiple Family ; H-1 , Heavy Industrial 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Medium Density Multiple Family 10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing r��� n Mnf i no wn, 4 PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : MAY CREEK ASSOCIATES , R-037-80 MAY 20 , 1980 PAGE TWO C . HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject site was annexed to the City by Ordinance #1823 dated April 21 , 1960 . An application to rezone the property to R-3, Multiple Family Residential was denied by the Hearing Examiner on December 19 , 1978 after holding public hearings on October .10, 1978 . The file was finally dismissed on January 21, 1980 . D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography: The site rises from west to east with slopes varying from 14% near the south property line to 9% in the middle portion and approximately 6% in the north. 2 . Soils : Alderwood gravelly sandy loam , 6-15% slopes , (AgC ) . Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil and very slow in the substratum . Runoff is slow to medium and the hazard of erosion is moderate . This soil is used for timber , pasture , berries , row crops and for urban development . Bellingham silt loam, less than 2% slopes (Bh) . Permeability is slow, runoff is slow., and the erosion hazard is slight . This soil is used mostly for pasture and a few areas are used for row crops . Kitsap silt loam , 8-15% slopes (KpC) . Runoff is medium and the erosion hazard is moderate to severe . . This soil is used for timber and pasture . 3 . Vegetation : The site consists primarily of fairly dense low ground cover in the form of scrub brushes and grass . Stands of deciduous trees are also scattered throughout the site . 4. Wildlife : Existing vegetation on the site provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 5 . Water : Some standing water was observed along the southern boundary of the subject site at the time of posting on May 6 , 1980 . 6. Land Use : The land use of the site consists of two existing single-family residences and an accessory building . To the north and east are scattered a few single family dwellings . The property to the south remains largely undeveloped . FAI-405 is located to the west of the subject site with a mixture of residential and industrial uses to the west of the freeway. E . NEIGH l ORH MDD CHARACTERISTICS : The area east of FAI-405 is largely undeveloped with the existing uses composed principally of single family dwellings with the exception of an apartment complex PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : MAY CREEK ASSOCIATES , R-037-80 MAY 20 , 1980 PAGE THREE 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department pursuant to ordinance requirements . 3 . Transit : Metro Transit Route 240 operates along Lake Washington Blvd. N .E . adjacent to the subject site . 4 . Schools : Kennydale Elementary School is located approximately 11/2 miles southeast of the site and McKnight Junior High School is within 21/2 miles to the southeast while Hazen High School is approxi- mately 4 miles to the southeast . 5 . Recreation : Kennydale Lions Park is within 14 miles to the southeast of the subject site and the North Highlands Park is approximately 22 miles to the southeast while Lake Washington Beach Park is within 21/2miles to the southwest . G . APPLICAtOLL SECTIONS OF THE ZOIEBJ1C CODE: 1 . Section 4-706, R-1, Residence Single Family . 2 . Section 4-708 , R-2 , Residence Two Family. H . , PPLICAI+IL( SECTIONS OF THE COMPRIEHENSIVE PLAIN OR OTHER WTTEIAL CITY ®OCUNLNIT: 1 . Land Use Report , 1965 , Residential , page 11 , and objectives 4. and 6 , pages 17-18 . I . IMPACT OF TIME NATURAL OR &flUNAN1 EENVIRONI,ENIT : 1 . Natural Systems : Rezoning of the subject site will not have a direct. impact upon the existing natural systems . However , the proposed future development of the site will cause an increase in storm water runoff, traffic movement , noise levels , and disturb soil and vegetation . 2 . Population/Employment : Construction of the 26 townhouse duplexes would increase the area population by approximately 65 persons . 3 . Schools : Approximately 6 additional pupils may be expected to inhabit the units , if approved . This will not significantly impact area schools . 4 . Social : Increased opportunities for social inter- action may result with development of the subject site . 5 . Traffic : The proposed development will increase traffic in the area by approximately 125 trips/day (6 trips/unit x 26 units) . rmu irR9a11KVu611rmirnle ctic ccEctemmrnvitr dlrnn rort-ennm. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : MAY CREEK ASSOCIATES , R-037-80 MAY 20 , 1980 PAGE FOUR L . PUNNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . The proposed rezone is consistent with the Comprehens ve Plan which designates the site as medium density multiple family and commercial . 2 . The proposal is generally consistent with the existin'! zoning to the south (i .e . B-1 , City of Renton .Tract 185 ; also B-C , Community Business-King County, for Tract 182 and RM 1800, High Density Multiple Family , King County , for Tract 167) . Tract 168 located east of the site within King County is zoned RS-9600 or equivalent to the zoning of the subject site , and is presently used as single family residential . During the last two years since the public hearing considering the rezone to R-3 , the property within the vicinity has been undergoing modifications in use . Tract 185 has recently received a special permit to allow filling and grading for future commercial development . To the southeast of the site a large condominium complex has been constructe• on Tract 166 and farther to the south the rezone request by Lyle Pickle to rezone a parcel of propert to B-1 is presently under consideration by the City Council . 3 . Although the Comprehensive Plan would appear to suggest that an R-3 zoning classification would be appropriate for the site , the facts remain that the area is still developing and that increasing the density as originally proposed in 1978 would still be unappropriate . The present proposal to develop the site with 26-units is basically a 45% reduction from the original proposal of 47 units . This reduction in density would appear to protect the existing single family residential development in the vicinity of the subject site . Objective No . 4 of the Comprehensive Plan Ladd Use Report of 1965 , page 17 states that "property values should be protected within the community for the benefit of its residents and property owners through effecti e control of land use and enforcement of building construction codes . " In 1978 the Hearing Examiner decided that the proposed development of 47 units was in conflict with this objective in that it appeared to be premature and create too high of a density adjacent to established single family residential . This was also supported by Objective No . 6 which encourages "the development and utilize ion of land to its highest and best use in such a way as to promote the best interest of the community and contribute to its overall attractiveness and desirability as a place in which to work , shop , PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : MAY CREEK ASSOCIATES , R-037-80 MAY 20, 1980 PAGE FIVE 1 . That substantial evidence was presented demonstrating the subject ' s reclassification appears to not have been specifically considered at the time of the last area land use analysis and area zoning ; or 2 . That the property is potentially zoned for the reclassification being requested pursuant to the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan and conditions have been met which would indicate that the change is appropriate ; or 3 . That since the last previous land use analysis of the area zoning of the subject property , authorized public improvements , permitted private development or other circumstances affecting the property have undergone significant and material change . In 1978 it was determined that the property was potentially zoned as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan ; however , the development was premature because of the lack of City services and the existing develop- ment in the area . The present application has shown that the reduce density is more appropriate in buffering the existing residential uses and that sewer and water are available to the site . Therefore , . the reclassification request appears to be appropriate . 5 . The site contains a considerable number of significant trees along the Lake Washington Blvd . N.E . frontage and for the length of the eastern property line . These should be retained as much as possible as part of the site development . The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Report , 1965 , page 11 , states that "residential development may be successfully planned to take good advantage of the amenities which such locations often provide . Natural features such as rock outcroppings , streams, stands of native trees , and views often available from these locations should be used to greatest advantage . " The schematic design landscaping plan has been. presented for the proposed 26-unit development . It appears to, take advantage of the natural vegetation along both Lake Washington Blvd . and the eastern boundary of the property . However, specific care should be taken in insuring that the project is enhanced by such vegetation and any supplemental vegetation added . 6 . The anticipated traffic from the project does not appear to significantly impact either Lake Washington Blvd . N .E . or S . E . 76th Street . At the present time Lake Washington Blvd . has a right-of-way of 80 ' which would be sufficient for the expansion of the arterial as the area to the northeast develops . Only possible design problem might result from r 1111 PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : MAY CREEK ASSOCIATES , R-037.-80 MAY 20 , 1980 PAGE SIX 7 . The applicant ' s conceptual site plan as submitted appears to show a conscious effort to reduce the density from a maximum allowable of .75 units under the Comprehensive Plan to 26 units . In addition , provides adequate setbacks to all property lines to assure that the project does not create an environ mental intrusion into an established residential area . The specific refinements of the plan concerning the landscaping buffer can be evaluated at the time of building permit application . Detailed review of landscaping and site plans by the Hearing Examiner appear to be unnecessary because of the applicant ' s reduction in development intensity from the original application in 1978 . 8 . The applicant will have to add the necessary water lines and fire hydrants to meet the fire code and provide all necessary storm drainage and utility lines as specified by the Public Works Department . These can be accomplished at the time of building permit application . 9. The applicant has submitted elevations of the subject site in an effort to show that the project will not block the view of single family residences to the east of the subject property . The site plans propose building clusters of two units with attached garages so that the actual construction does .not create a solid view obstructing wall . The slope of the site and the adjacent property to the east provides sufficient height so that the single family residences will be able to see over the proposed development , if the structures have a maximum height of 25 feet to the top of the roof. M. PLANNING DEPAARTmEINJT REC®NI ENDATIff : Based upon the foregoing analysis , the Planning Department recommends that the applicant ' s request for a rezone from G-9600 to R-2 , Multiple Family Residential , File No . R-037-80 be approved subject to the following conditio is : 1 . The filing of restrictive covenants to include the following : a. Maximum development of 26 units. b . 2 unit structures as presented in plans received 4/2/80. c . Maximum height of structures not to exceed 25 feet . 2 . A 20-foot setback requirement along Lake Washington Blvd. N .E. and the eastern property line . - 'bI I (JI1V I '....) IN1,,,L I ., . f' "'�'d'i'•1p6' v, 'F„!Vi,'; Q ! r ' ., ',eke«t4°• t"�! iz. 0, . . Lam"=' t+ . / iV CC 4,4•1,{ ---__ -- I`, .:-. •. • y t e ..lf it }u,}. . • , • �. E try' ,f,I,' x..`' r3 '',7& 1EP,, •-1` \ kAltf yr1 s t" `'! k'�`'•i• tt S, ,y` s;•,�A n� �.• r• �,3',"4:i ..�ri._• '.. q fY4.; F•t'k d "'t APY'r1 ,1"- 1•�•;.S i-n•a� ,ta �a`}-.. �iAe.a yya 4 t , Y t tx ,., t S .� a 1,-" . .}rAta.'*' S's" �,` r;`{�.y}„7" •03127 InI. .,.-....••w+...•w-....,....w..�.rx-.uat}o_ lr+iw+.y - ,x-.ar.r- nvwt. wi l' .,:: t:. _ .� 'i .� ro hW iRBi''"' "" 1 * t pp ► 9 f 4: 1 ? � r .1 , t < E o t�� t i, ar�ak C}F t` v ''E'1 'i ', „. W a Lip,'aye '-,C;i lv:•�S• �lhi r{�I,. .�,� ',7rft ,,^.:Iv w,, E -44a: • 14, 4..011. •ps .w �tT. +'�'&. �i 7i '�.t 1 a•. .t r. \ =.-; 3 +e. Rf �1C _�i15 ,r t r,.•i "*t - 1 r ep =tn ,,14 t af:,'C i el' i ,, L". « lreV,'•'z 4 •P�:. �'--� lx�j�� ,F.# :-tLI: 1 k • . •4 V . J'f • • fb • may., 'riiio- ?..- ' ,. r S, ,. t+.. ' •tf u.� • "'L). I •r 4 .Mfg E3:.� 4 8 7 i2t1 r =. ,,.- :,c,S��y p' 4f ;,.. t s, ' a �f , •r, �' ! L. e, nit .: �� *.r, -.l t,�« tN L '+uFt rct, �.....-* .. !!" err PO t CO0. 1 7 It Qi` ,wi it,+ ! ff �" Y ,' t + 11' 'i1,. A i9 A • • _10. �! Leff ...oar-E 4,*a`"4, `.4 s.G*bRr.,,�,p ^w tt;. f L. +�¢s<a, Ill i`> CY/ .a+. ,.. . w. ...�. yt.' co . - - Gp,r,}� -t"ei,v. �.'Y., ua ® y� ',•.z'• �!.{ F• rr.a- `' � D „ 4 yvCl ` n +3F 1 t 'S 4t`, ,r. �' a"' "� «� ,-"•Y `�t" e• ,'".v, vw�� r 'AM• . 'II a • ,- - a• s 4lr' g at1^ w * �"M, '".y.iy..• '.,,,,a e, t, -w. er .0 ."- .d* • w '_'•M.N..J. ...rt. 4.1t,--(1-• ' F \. d �i ,+,i'�':'"' Yq •b.w,. .. t `., Ltd 7 1✓°r••k• *ekt. " e— 4 " 1. ;''K'` " m FYs tP'i, i{ri,'1, a 1 , d*.. `d" " „ o.0 ra :. Ay. t ,4 ':f �.,�}i4,r� f 4w *, "drsm C.vr « am ih ro4 " i•. , ,�,,.,�t t�l \�k a $� "w..„,,,444. ♦w:.,.. .aar-^ca .. i 1„.. ••r rw .r ar v •. y H k x r )tE&0'..A!) � lit aaa 1",, a, y , ' � • .• 9 a+ ...4�;�5 ,• yr •, "' 'i` •• �^.'* r9 .+y,r',Kk l r° s.- .-• •+.. + ,tor'r .ti 'fir, +�, ; a }i; '� �, 1. 1 It 4 ` .-tom_ t , a 1 } n 7 �" * • an f `4 s �tiy 4 1t VI , ‘fr ' 1 v ,.fit•. -• .\k,t wiVaI mp a,:rr; �1 'rpp•" r..,c, F, t k 6 • • _ .0 \�r - wy� - ww e n Ev+n D .It, v^ -.''' -S,.it ..., •1,4 4 .� ^ N A �' }e,. • , ;a irk,• `',� -ti wi.: t :•c r'a '"'$, i�i.•r3' x s'' pp�rl:,y..4 v' ,r,;,`} �t�y��kp�.,� 'Y 1.yt�, •1. .r;' " x••,.,1'.; 'y "d�.'e �. w t�s �rc i,� �Yfei�w�l �.'�dR.fib'V' -, 1141,u'�['i-,11y'•.�1lb�w R,]',F.•:°R!:1'irk.ILY.1i,Ad•%:I/(IiR '/�N+,'.SE`45•Nw.._ a.. - 1 .. 'S._. . '''ILL, ''t �l_ �.l l�-l _L-.,. ,� �t i > -' ..• .%c`.--. (` '`i. `mil • 1 P � /a 1 'i io :; (_ ( ' �.-l( 0/ _ / -C:1/4---) ../ ' . / MI -'...,1 .....--- •1Na ' , ♦ �+ 6 ,:;mow` �"`1 , ' e /� • ' / /// // — 0 . •� �- •, ; Cr 0O ` / / 16 Iai � Ib,1 4 r - �/ �1✓ it (n . // \itta o {4 / N. C.N., , - ."'-'1, / CI' /- . -c.. i 0 - -- i ' y 111 'ft ^~j // i y' \`• -"- o / �i ( "; / _ 4...4 !4571 : ota--wwlill-`4•9 ..1-1- 0) • •1t b ram r Yi MAY CREEK ASSOCIATES * (c. , i.(PROPOSED) ` ,. •,,, . e ... ....„... °;,V.- REZONE REQUEST: G 9, 600 to R-2 , Residential Multiple Family uo� Y `_ C''"�'°N.' '1 - �•.- FILE NUMBER R-037-80 A • Y• . 'ly,... Y ..4 r ',Yi.T. , n :65) q r..4A, _ v t' G------ -- _II' -- j 1 i _. ,` _i - r - - —•-1y+AP✓�F._ _ it..'" _ —if` _ .. - — — -ramk. �"I"��.+ — r I , 11 11 _ I .I1 1« 1— .-, _ " '�{ lsnttca- " ._ i--- I ti ,,,:; �,.i. �If II1' 1'I I� - .{ �. r 1 ,r tit'a, _. ci Id1`f " ' • i .. Cflo ' , v II _,„-/--....-<'----'.."------ . MAY CREEK ASSOCIATES ,�' �~` ,- .� a 'mg ors REZONE G 9,600 to R-2 � � Jai aii ev.D µ^ ' 'ijII II, Ifj'`�o FILE NUMBER R-037-80 ; 7) ff { I �I1 I, t CROSS SECTIONS 1i _. sw�-t,„p�UN�N _ i t� I ii 1 "� i 'I: r4 i�4i'.271,4-4 , i`s i I. _ -. I.i I. l i 4 , ,,d l Hp:i, 0" f 1 li I111f .f :i ,i1 i C ... I I~ IY I�rk1H144.1 t i 4,;, `, i u I r. i �' - t . .exit .-_ �'�"' A$4,1. .471rYI-:. t"rfs'I r:.4,--=4,J" - ...,s e,.ti 7r.....A.. . 019/94 Planning 4111 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : Peoropm "'X � 7. e) —��€ +a 4` ® FP- pot Meici517uitt Int et ag 17f. $21D tsb eaW Location : 99 Z. 0,d®v tiVe'". 04/c p �&Pad Applicant : I`. . ;: z�•'. TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :_ ___V*3 Police Department A. R.C. MEETING DATE : '/// ei Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division /2"Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRI I G F R THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9 :00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF Y U DEPARTMENT DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEAS PLEAS5 PR VIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions , Not Approved /.:C !_ /^/?' /;/.lid �" C 1 /Cif i - /� ' �/ , (' ' f 1 f 5_. ;,4i'.S /V/; [_C.• �.'r�� -` ' rf,_. r ._�.'l�- ./Cf.:. J C' /C /./` —G j�l_r y/'. 'C;•.'/G�.-i.�� /i:j�s /�i�/ '/1;"-Z2 -'S/.1//- i /• > /, 47:1/)L • /../ /' i.'/ f. �/�/! /'.i _- i ; t..- . //�i / '/f / L':" �- {� !-/ // Signature of Director or Authorized Representative " Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : -04.4fIl Approved ✓ Approved with Conditions Not Approved 4_0(iyui,u_eA it U)21/e- ' 9' 4,„ o L. "s_ Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date MOP ID 0 Planning 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: Rei, (R• 03?. ode) C?.upo A A •s2 pv,_ p-kpole etream .4. 41,‘,„._ ea* , . 16„ LA.& WO erwww f IP Eglephia MIPS toldAi4.41 Location: 99epv L. A/og r.� ? i O1t.d. 44" &read/& . J Applicant: M,a (reP& 4s €I es TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:_ ---441/00 Police Department A.R.C. MEETING DATE: $///8,5 Public Wo As Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRIL uR THE APPLICATION :RKVjEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON ,, ►► AT U A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF Y U DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE- WILL NOT ABLE T ATTEND THE ARC, PLEASE PR VIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 55:OU P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved X Approved with Conditions / Not Approved I) Q74 S,•Ie !n-i-rro1/2/ye�-T/S v-e.O' a.,Ve,../� ` ire_ .4s4,'frijj,,.. a7,e l S�76.4 D/._ S/ Te S 1.ti L..)401Qv- Y^Ci/ /,�/�f2T r CV`- „t,4,YCj 0... .556„ s jr„..... IL` f.e.,„'iOw4„ zs y r s44.1*-i.n— 3) l¢✓c�i a.a../a dr o j ran.) J S=e.1- e- 1_ i..-Gs j (1./. ._.,...____,;)) <(77/t_43Tv-r- (... ----- g/le/Pe Signature of Director or Autho zed Rep es ntative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Terf,AE:f c. f!' / 16t et'lxdc; olvi Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved G J yi srd v is ; oirpi c. A ,gi , .s oatie 7Z' �N�yy1�lft A . o oeue Pevi 6cid, , o 4. r'•ce4.c• <1:ir: .I"'_a ed• VA `, +Ittp v l.4. &',i A'rs _ o �`,q e F '�D' ii M .ArlsivrAcxeci . e ". .4,;:ir : ei-/G - 8 0 Cinnntnra of niraetnr nr authnrized Renresentati..ve Date /NV 0 Planning • 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : .• ® 7. , -4 � j .r� ,� � �- $00 /1 o42 ^+ r_ ,64,0 e dram -VO 2ft it 400a01"/149 f IP 4 Location : �n k �? Q_� 1 I" Appl i cant: Mt ayepeek A4,5 dbe bideS TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:_ SA020 Police Department A.R.C. MEETING DATE: ,TdUgoos Public Works Department Engineering Division , Traffic Engineering i,a' Building Division Utilities Engineering _ Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRI I G FpiI R THE APPLICATION R V EW CONFERENCE ARC) TO BE HELD ON . � AT :�U A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TQ ATTEND THE ARC, 'Iowa: THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:0U P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved • Signature of Director or /Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: / I Approved Approved with Conditions _ Not Approved 1110 FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No (s ) : R-037-80 Environmental Checklist No : ECF-556-80 Description of Proposal : Rezone Proponent : MAY CREEK ASSOCIATES Location of Proposal : Vicinity of 4904 Lake Washington Blvd. NE (Tract 181 ) Lead Agency : CITY OF RENTON This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on April 23 , 1980 following a presentation by Steve Munson and Dave Clemens of the Planning Department . Oral comments were accepted from: Warren G. Gonnason - Impact of reversed density and land use . Substantiation of environmental impact . Gordon Y . Ericksen - low density appropriate. Incorporated by reference in the record of the. proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-556-80 are the following: 1 ) . Environmental Checklist Review Sheet , prepared by: Steve Munson , Assistant Planner, April 21 , 1980 2) Applications : R-037-80 3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance : Warren G. Gonnason - recommended declaration of non- significance. Gordon Y. Ericksen concurring. Acting as the Responsible Official , the ERC has determined this development does not have significant adverse impact on the environment . An EIS is not required under RCW 43 .21C .030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. • Signatures : ;+ / / , ier Jc�fi E . t•Jebley , Park-s- Director I Go 'don Y.. ricksen, Planning Director: f • / r% Warren G . Gonnason , Director \ " Public Works Department • 411/ FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No (s ) : R-037-80 Environmental Checklist No : ECF-556-80 Description of Proposal : Rezone Proponent : MAY CREEK ASSOCIATES Location of Proposal : 'vicinity of 4904 Lake Washington Blvd. NE (Tract 181 ) Lead Agency : CITY OF RENTON This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on April 23 , 1980 following a presentation by Steve Munson and Dave Clemens of the Planning Department . Oral comments were accepted from : Warren G . Gonnason - Impact of reversed density and land use . Substantiation of environmental impact . Gordon Y . Ericksen - low density appropriate . Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-556-80 are the following : 1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet , prepared by : Steve Munson , Assistant Planner, April 21 , 1980 2 ) Applications : R-037-80 3 ) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance : Warren G . Gonnason - recommended declaration of non- significance . Gordon Y. Ericksen concurring . Acting as the Responsible Official , the ERC has determined this development does not have significant adverse impact on the environment . An EIS is not required under RCW 43 .21C .030 ( 2 ) (c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Signatures : 144 ,A0// t. ;55_:), oliin E . Webley , Park irector / Go don Y. Ericksen, Planning Director (4-9- Warren G . Gonnason , Director � . Public Works Department 411 Date circulated : 7 z/( 1312 Comments due: y/z 3 /Po ENVIRONMENTAL CHECECLIST REVIEU SHEET E C F - $®, APPLICATION No(s) . D/Y --(R-10 ,37^.03 ,GOO 7t,Q -o:Z PROPONENT: /' Ay CPe � r 5�®e/ae/P PROJECT TITLE: A 11 Brief Description of Project : l'r�pose JCan drei ,/ien 11-tm homes e de'p/°xis ,ci /- 6 t ar c s LOCATION : We, L.ea, S4i',ij��v� etv • /1/�r :07;eatT SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (o) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1) Topographic changes: (/ 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : i// 3) Water & water courses : 4 ;/ 4) Plant life : V//_ 5) Animal life: .✓ I- 6) Noise: y/ 7) Light & glare : 8) Land Use ; north: '.:. " f_ .J , east : ,nR1g80 u, �.D south: d sr Fart west : �E�T 0C� Land use conflicts: � �% 0 -1);\1"1"V 4 T`� View obstruction : `N'2 6)1 9 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : V 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13) Trip ends ( ITE) : traffic impacts : _ 14) Public services: 15 ) Energy : 16) Utilities : 17) Human health: / 18) Aesthetics : d 19) Recreation: /' 20) Archeology/history : _ COMMENTS : Recommendation: DNSI_ DO. More Information Reviewed by s c . Title : Date : FORM: ERC-06 r„? 154166. • • Date circulated : 7 ,/z/( 130 Comments due: y/Z 3 1P.0 ENVIRONMIEINTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - S:5X- $0 APPLICATION No (s) . RE,7e/Y -637-11.31.) 6="GD0 710 PROPONENT : f r[Ay CPe e/ 6C/a7'' v • PROJECT TITLE: 11 JJ Brief Description of Project : PupocCJCa#t Sri^ue*oh m hO U C clop/ox w/a.ec`e e a pa y e A LOCATION : 99 / L,44SAirtg/e eLI! /V ?% €T ASO SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : %� 1 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : y 3) Water & water courses : _ }� 4) Plant life : • 5 ) Animal life: _. \/ 6) Noise : >( 7) Light & glare : • 8) Land Use ; north: east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction: -- —" 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 1 13) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14) Public services: 15 ) Energy : : 16 ) Utilities : • 17 ) Human health: • 18) Aesthetics: X 19) Recreation: x _ -420 ) Archeology/history: COMMENTS: •• • Recommendation : DNSI ,;' DOS More Information Reviewed by : .� --- • Title : Date : FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated: W2.1( 13® Comments due : WZ 3 1 Pp• ENIVIRONMENTAL CHECIKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF APPLICATION No(s) . flie..7DAe -YR-037"A T 6 iiGDD PROPONENT : May oc/SeS PROJECT TITLE: A 11 ,/ Brief Description of Project : PupocechanSTruG?<<eh W rt hew e dup/exes Ada- e•`tS eeray es . LOCATION : 7 efv • /1/ (sae /S7) SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality: kT 3) Water & water courses: T 4). Plant life : 5) Animal life : > 6) 'Noise : X 7) Light & glare : 8) Land Use ; north: east: south: west : Land use conflicts : / Z �c__ View obstruction : J 9) Natural resources: 10 ) Risk of upset : /‹. 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : X 13) Trip ends ( ITE) : traffic impacts : 14) Public services : )( I 15 ) Energy : X 16) Utilities: 17) Human health: . �C , 18) Aesthetics: 5 ' 19) Recreation : x 20) Archeology/history : l� _ COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI2C DOS More Information_ Reviewed by : A- _litle : Date : `//ZZ.—/e& FORM: ERC-06 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON , WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON, ON MAY 20, 1980 , AT 9 :00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1. RENTON ELKS CLUB , APPLICATIONS FOR WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS , File W-030-80, AND EXCEPTION TO THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE TO ALLOW ACCESS BY EASEMENT , File E-043-80 ; property located between Renton Elks Club and Benson Road. 2. BRADY INTERNATIONAL HARDWOODS COMPANY, APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE IN M-P ZONE , File SP-011-80 ; property located on the east side of Lind Ave . S .W. , 550 feet north of S .W. 34th St . 3 . BRADY INTERNATIONAL HARDWOODS COMPANY, APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT 72 , 370 SQ. FT . WAREHOUSE/ OFFICE FACILITY IN M-P ZONE , File SA-012-80 ; property located on the east side of Lind Ave . S.W. , 550 feet north of S .W. 34th St . 4 . MAY CREEK ASSOCIATES , APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G-9600 TO R-2 FOR PURPOSE OF FUTURE CONSTRUCTION OF 26 TOWNHOUSE DUPLEXES , File R-037-80 ; property located in the vicinity of 4904 Lake Washington Blvd. N.E. (Tract 181) , adjacent to and north of S .E. 76th St . Legal descriptions of files noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE. PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON MAY 20, 1980 , AT 9 :00 A. M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . PUBLISHED : May 7, 1980 GORDON Y. ERICKSEN, RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I , ROGER BLAYLOCK , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn to before me , a Notary Public , in and for the State of Washington residing in King County , on the 2nd day of May. (RIX �► SIGNED : ‘It., OF R�� tt. .1- � THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 .i n BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR o PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0 9.0 co• 235- 2550 0gTeO SEPT May 2 , 1980 May Creek Associates P. O .- Box 622 Kirkland, Washington 98033 Re : APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G-9600 TO R-2 FOR PURPOSE OF FUTURE CONSTRUCTION OF 26 TOWNHOUSE DUPLEXES , File R-037-80 ; property located in the vicinity of 4904 Lake Washington Blvd. N.E . (Tract 181) , adjacent to and north of S .E . 76th St. Gentlemen : The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on April 21 , 1980. A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for May 20, 1980 at 9 :00 a.m. Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present . All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing. If you have any further questions, please call the Renton Planning Department , 235-2550 . Very truly yours, Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Rog !4eB5illock Associate Planner RJB:wr cc : Norman W. McCue P. 0. Box 622 Kirkland, WA 98033 411 • •.' y• GENERAL LOCATION: AND, OR ADDRESS: LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF 4904 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. N.E . (TRACT 181) , ADJACENT TOS AND NORTH OF S.E. 76TH ST. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT. I S POSTED TO NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS OF TO BE HELD IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL BUILDING ON MAY 20, 1980 BEGINNING AT 9 :00 A.M. P.M. C •NCERNING ITEM Elf • 4 co' ' ' y fi E ZO . '$E — G-9600 TO R-2 FOR-PURPOSE OF FUTURE CONSTRUCTIN FILE037-80 a S ' ECI . . PERMIT • SITE AA' PROVAL U WAIVEa= : NOR,'a LINE .ANAGEMENT PERMIT DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE - DIRECT APPEALS TO HEARING EXAMINER. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON , WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC ) has issued a final declaration of non-significance for the following projects : 1 . MAY CREEK ASSOCIATES (ECF-556-80 ) , APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G-9600 TO R-2 FOR PURPOSE OF FUTURE CONSTRUCTION OF 26 TOWNHOUSE DUPLEXES , File R-037-80 ; property located in the vicinity of 4904 Lake Washington Blvd. N . E . ( Tract 181 ) , adjacent to and north of S . E . 76th St . 2 . BRADY INTERNATIONAL HARDWOODS COMPANY (ECF-546-80 ) , APPLICATIONS FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE IN M. P ZONE AND SITE APPROVAL FOR A 72 , 370 SQ . FT . WAREHOUSE/OFFICE FACILITY , Files SP-011-80 and SA-012-80 ; property located on the east side of Lind Ave . S . W . , 550 feet north of S .W. 34th St . 3 . DENNIS SMART (ECF-562-80 ) , APPLICATION FOR TENTATIVE PLAT APPROVAL IN L-1 ZONE (LOT #1 OF WALKER MOUNTAIN SHORT PLAT 373-79 ) , File Tentative Plat 042-80 ; property located on southeast corner of Jefferson and N . E . 4th St . Further information regarding this action is available in the Planning Department , Municipal Building, Renton, Washington , 235-2550 . Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by May 14, 1980 . Published : April 30 , 1980 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE APRIL 23, 1980 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 10:00 A.M. : THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM 1 . NEW BUSINESS : ECF-555-80 'DOMINIC J. COLASURDO SP-032-80 Application for special permit to fill and grade in B-1 and R-3 zones; property located south side of N.E. 4th Street approximately 160 feet east of Union Avenue N.E. ECF-556-80 MAY CREEK ASSOCIATES R-037-80 Application for rezone from G-9600 to R-2 for purpose of future construc- tion of 26 townhouse duplexes ; property located in the vicinity of 4904 Lake Washington Blvd. N.E. (Tract 181 ) , adjacent to and north of S.E. 76th Street. ECF-546-80 BRADY INTERNATIONAL HARDWOODS COMPANY SP-011-80 Applications for special permit SA-012-80 to fill and grade in M-P zone and site approval for a 72 , 370 sq. ft. warehouse/office facility; property located on the east side of Lind Avenue S.W. , 550 feet north of S.W. 34th Street. ECF-562-80 DENNIS SMART Tentative Plat Application for tentative plat approval 042-80 in L-1 zone (Lot 111 of Walker mountain Short Plat 373-79) ; property located on southeast corner of Jefferson and N.E. 4th Street. ECF-542-80 CITY OF RENTON WELLS AVENUE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT Construction of a new four-lane bridge on North Wells , where it crosses the Cedar River. r rzs Date circulated : q/zi( 0 Comments due: 4/2 3 /PO ENIVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - .5:5g- g® APPLICATION No(s) • 0 ,..7p,+y CR-637- 6-- gQ® (2. PROPONENT : MAy CPe 1S5®e/a/P PROJECT TITLE : Brief Description of Project : 8erocvoiretotS/rue_iiort `At") rt Aouc dop/e°xt, 64 ar i eS LOCATION: WO itgAwl div e /so.") SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : • V 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : 5) Animal life: 6) Noise: 7) Light & glare : 8) Land Use ; north: east : l-p`# s -j1i, L- 4p), c le south: DYjk'lretot west : Fd OS' Land use conflicts : 11.„YeAllegs4.1,c_ey,"...eki rro;fi S �Sy0 View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of. upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings :. 13) Trip ends ( ITE) : (� traffic impacts : 14) Public services: 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation: 20 ) Archeology/history : 0 1 COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information •�; Reviewed by : /�a.,,� Title : .S$� 1Q,� ��e• U Date : //2/f eo FORM: ERC-06 Ili CITY OF RENTON Oh S RE7ONE APPLICATION . FOR OFFICE USE ONLY LAND USE HEARING APPLICATION NO. -- oJ7-id EXAMINER 'S ACTION APPLICATION FEE $ 9c?4- 7'` _S APPEAL FILED RECEIPT NO . CITY COUNCIL ACTION FILING DATE /0 6, ORDINANCE NO. AND DATE HEARING DATE APPLICANT TO COr1PLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 10 : 1 . Name May Associates Phone 454-6404 Address P.O. Box 622 Kirkland, Wa 98033 3. Property petitioned for rezoning is located on 4904 Lake Washington Blvd N.E. between S.E. 76th. & (north of) and Lake Washington Blvd. N.E. (Fast of) 4 . Square footage or acreage of property 109,771.20 or 2.52 acres + 5 . Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet) Tract 181, C.D. Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden Addition to Seattle, Division No. 3, according to the Plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 81, in King County, Washington, lying southeasterly of the southeast margin of Lake Washington Boulevard northeast (Kennydale Newport Road) ; together with that portion of vacated County Road No. 34 described as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of said Tract 181; thence northerly along the easterly line of said tract 181, to the southwesterly line of said vacated County Road No. 34; thence continuing northerly along the last described line extended to a point of intersection with the southeasterly margin of Lake Washington Blvd. northeast (Kennydale Newport Road) and the terminus of said line. 6 . Existing Zoning G-9600 Zoning Requested R-2 NOTE TO APPLICANT : The following factors are considered in reclass,' i . A1 property. Evidence or additional information Cjs'ub��t�iY1 e your request may be attached to this sheet. . ee .� -\-ipa Procedure Sheet for specific requirements . ) t bm@ �- iis form in duplicate. U gi 0 P� 196 1.- 7. Proposed use of site Medium Density Multi-family for .2 6 units p„-..--•• 4,7 .e 4� `iA,• N1NG 8. List the measures to be taken to reduce impact on the surrounding area. 1. Conform to natural land contours. 2. Egress and ingress on both streets bordering property to lessen traffic. 3. Use of plantings as low profile screening to surrounding neighbors. 9 . How soon after the rezone is granted do you intend to develop the site? Depending upon financing availability in today's market • 10 . Two copies of plot plan and affidavit of ownership are 'required. Planning Dept. 1-77 AFFIDAVIT Norman W. McCue, I , Managing Partner for May Creek Associates , being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this day of January , 19 80 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Bellevue 0 r f")/_ d ,A0-b( 4 / 0-4 X,11./14 (Name ofi N.tary Public) (S gnatu e o Own r) 16051 N.E. 6th Bellevue, Wa 98008 1728 116th. N.E. (Address) (Address) Bellevue, W 98005 (City) (State) 454-6404 (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that tie foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found tom }� h and complete in every particular and to cn conform to the rule a ' re uQ 'ohs of the Renton Planning Department governing the filiA i \ a pl ',cation . IP Tr; Date Received .9• E By: 4'vNING Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON <:,1^- ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM „ � �° � �, < ; 40 ' 4/ FOR OFFICE USE ONLY � . II�" ):4- - / Application No. 41�7 -gp ,h ., ;4/Environmental Checklist No. ,t-C7/-- ;,`l:=Zr,0 -` y '" ' _ PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date: II Declaration of Significance ®Declaration of Significance Declaration of Non-Significance ® Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: II Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires • all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental valueslIboth for theAir own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. II Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers, llinclude your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should • include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and whi'(ch are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now ai;ill help all agencies involved with 'your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. I The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the licenlse for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it isicompleted, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. ii NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on, to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM II I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent i4iay Creek Associates 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: P . C . 3ox 622 Kirkland, yJn. 98033 3. Date Checklist submitted iilarch 6, 1980 4. Agency requiring Checklist city. of Benton 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: I, Way- Creek Condominiums 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and .other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : 13 two story frame constructed townhouses duplexes with attached garages (26 units in all) . Spacious floor plans to include two bedrooms, two baths and large deiks mith with beautiful lake views. .3uildings will givelthe appear- ance of single family dwellings warmed by shingle siding. • Landscaped with natural plantings and evergreens' the units will be nestled into the hillside. ;; II i o . IMP ,„ 41, • -2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : • Located above 405 across from Lake ,%Tashington with easy' access to freeway both north and southbound. Buildings spaced effectively around a prominent knoll in order to provide maximum views for each unit with a minimizing iipact to adjacent .proplerties. Pleasant appearance of single family. .. 8. Estimated ate for comp etion of the proposal : '. dwellings, September 1981 9. List of all permits, licenses or government approvals required for the proposal • (federal ,' state and local --including rezones) : City. of Renton Rezone, Building Permit and Grading Permit. • 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: No 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: No • 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: • II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) (1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: ' (a) , Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic ' substructures? XX ' YE- MAYBE No (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or over- ' covering of the soil? _ _ _ X • • YES MAYBE NO (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X YE"- FIAT ' (d) ' The destruction, covering or modification of .any unique geologic or physical features? VET- MAYBE No (e) Any increase in wind or water er-bsi•on- of soils, X either On or off the site? YE- RATITE 0, (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation. deposition ,or erosion which may modify the channel of a river' or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Yam- MAYBE Explanation: Intend to reduce high •s-eot and fill in swamp area • in lower corner of property. Reduction of height will reduce ohRtr>J ti nn ox view from adjacent property' to t 'e East. y II • 3 41111 (2) Air. ' Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air I quality? X Y 'MAYBE (b) The creation of objectionable odors? X VET—,MAYBE IT(� (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or Ii regionally? X YES WAIT i1 Explanation: it (3) Water. Will the proposal result in: I� (a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X YES MA'S NO (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns , or j the rate and amount of surface water runoff? I(X . YET— M N (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? I X YES MAYS WO-- (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? '' X YES MAYBE NO (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration !1 surface water quality, including but not limited to 1 temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? I! X YES MAYBE Na ii (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X YE — MAYBE NO (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either I' through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through 'I direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? L' X YET- MAYBE Wo— o (1 ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X FM MAYBE WU— Explanation: Portions of the site will be covered by iuildings, or paved. The resultant impervious areas will be dained, retained, and discharged consistant with present rates and rorovv55 c��� %+�� accordance __ y ,� ._[' amount.:JA. i14 with City. of Renton 1 li�t!it�G 111�i�.A'�!U• • (4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: II (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass , crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? ii X Yrs- MAYBE l (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species Of flora? 1 X YES"' MAYBE IFS (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? YES- MAYBE N (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X `I Explanation,: li II it 4 (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? YET- WEX NO (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? X V— MYYB€ NO (d) ,Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X YES WEE No Explanation: (6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Additional vehicular traffic due to increase in number of rP.qi Cientc in the are-2 . ,(7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or • glare? X EE — MAYBE NO Explanation: Some attractive lighting will be added near the vicinity of the structure to illuminate parking and build .n.g areas. • (8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X Yt RATFE NO Explanation: (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X YET— MAYBE N (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YET— MAYBE N Explanation: (10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous 'substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X VT WYE NIO Explanation: (11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? V_ MAYBE NO-- Explanation: ',animal increase in population of the local area. -5- (12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing,, or create a demand for additional housing? X YES 'MAYBE NO Explanation: (13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: it (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X YES MAYBE NO . (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X YES MMAYBE NO (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? 1! X V-Err MAYBE W15— I, (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? I X (V MAYBE (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X YET— MAYBE NO (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? IjX YET— MAYBE WU— Explanation: Addition of approximately 26 residences *ill increase the vehicular movement when people occupy the unit As a result there will likely be an increase in traffichazards, it (14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : (a) Fire protection? II X YES MAYBE Nam" • (b) Police protection? X YE M BE NO (c) Schools? II X YES MAYBE NB (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? 11 X YES MAYBE, NO (e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? III YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? 'X YES RATWE NO Explanation: Addition of 26 living units will cause a !slight increase in maintainance of roads and other public 'facilities, (15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X VT WAtEr AO I (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X YES MAYBE PT6— i Explanation: i1 '.I (16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new 'I systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? whir Y!B Mh N O (b) Communications systems? X VT MM NO (c) Water'? d YES MAYBE NO • 41110 -6- (d) Sewer or septic tanks? X • YES MAYBE NO (e) Storm water drainage? X Yam— HAT&T ff (f) Solid waste and disposal? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Additional sewer and water lines have already b• en installed in the area. Other utilities may require additiin in order to handle the increased number of residents. (17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of I any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X' Y€ — -MAYBE N0 Explanation: (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive - site open to public view? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • • (19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? ), YE MAYBE NO Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: (signed) (name printed) City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 40 410 h �v (° MEMORANDUM OF MAY CREEK ASSOCIATES PQ� ••°' i�If IN FAVOR OF REZONE APPLICATION NUMBER CR A7NIPIG • May Creek Associates is petitioning for a rezone of property located at 4904 Lake Washington Boulevard N.E. , north of S.E. 76th and east of Lake Washington Boulevard N.E. The property is approximately 2 . 52 acres. The legal description is listed in the application. The existing zoning is G-9600, and the requested zoning is R-2, medium density, multifamily. The proposed use of the site is to construct a 26-unit townhouse complex. Under the Renton Municipal Code, a proponent of a rezone must clearly. show that the proposed change is appropriate and timely. The applicant firmly believes that both elements are met in this request. In 1978, the applicant made application for a reclassification of the subject property to R-3 . After a series of hearings, it was determined that an environmental impact statement would be required on the assumption that the maximum density permitted by an R-3 zone would be utilized by the applicant, of somewhat in excess of 70 units for the project. However, the applicant was only requesting some 50 units . The applicant decided to not pursue the R-3 request any further at that time. In that previous application, the Planning Department in its preliminary report to the Hearing Examiner and its addendum to the preliminary report firmly recommended an R-2 zoning classi- fication. Pursuant to the Renton Municipal Code, in order to reclassify property, the Hearing Examiner must find one or more of the following provisions are satisfied: (1) That the subject reclassification was not specific- ally considered at the time of the last comprehensive plan land use analysis and/or zoning application, or (2) That since the last previous comprehensive plan analysis of the subject property, public improvements and private development affecting the subject property have undergone signifi- cant and material change, or (3) That the property is potentially zoned for the reclassification being requested pursuant to the comprehensive plan policies and conditions have been met indicating the change is appropriate. The applicant far exceeds the minimum requirement in that all three of the above requirements are met, not just one. t4141/ Subject Reclassification Was Not Specifically Considered At The Time Of The Last Area Land Use Analysis And Area Zoning The subject site was annexed to the City on April 21, 1960. At that time, it was zoned by the county as G-9600. The City did not change the zoning classification at the time of annexation. The zoning designation has never been changed since the property was annexed, and the City has never specifically considered the propriety of the zoning classification until the previous application was made. In 1965, Renton adopted a comprehensive plan. At the time of adoption of the plan, no request has been made to rezone the subject property. Thus, there was no specific consideration of reclassification of the property at that time. The Proposed Rezone Is Appropriate According To The Goals And Policies Of The Comprehensive Plan In the Planning Department' s preliminary report, it found that the proposed rezone to R-3 was consistent with the comprehensive plan. R-2 is a less intensive use and thus is clearly authorized by the comprehensive plan. As stated above, the Planning Department favored and recommended an R-2 designation. Significant Circumstances And Changes Have Impacted The Property Since The Last Land Use And Area Zoning As stated above, when this property was annexed by the City of Renton, it retained its original county zoning of G-9600. Several parcels in the immediate vicinity, when annexed, also came in with a G classification. However, many zoning classifi- cation changes have been made, In 1969, parcels 184 and 193 were reclassified from G-9600 to B-1 by Ordinance No. 2487 . In 1970 , parcel 185 was reclassified from G-9600 to B-1. Those parcels to the immediate south of the subject property. Across the freeway, in 1966 , the strip of land where the Misty Cove Apartments now sit was rezoned from G-6000 to R-4 . The property immediately south of the Misty Cove Apartments apparently retained its zoning of H-1, heavy industrial . These zoning changes are consistent with the comprehen- sive plan and indicate the changing nature of the area. A physical inspection of the subject property in its immediate vicinity provides ample evidence that the development of the area indicates proper circumstances for a change in the existing land use and zoning classification. All existing utilities are available to the site and in close proximity, including sewers, gas, and water. Additionally, Lake Washington Boulevard is scheduled under the 6-year transportation improvement program for such improvements asdrainage-, paving, curbs, sidewalk, illumination and channelization. This will eliminate potential traffic problems caused by an increase of residents in the area. South of NE 44th Street a large steel building has been erected. Across the freeway, immediately west of the subject property, is a large log processing operation. To the north of these commercial operations, there is a large apartment building. The proposed use of the subject property at a density rate of 11 units per acre would be entirely beneficial to those currently residing in the few existing single-family residences to the east and the northeast. This project will provide an excellent transitional barrier and buffer to the commercial uses presently on property to the south and west. It provides a noise buffer to the residents, has minimal environmental impact, and would be vastly more esthetically pleasing than any possible commercial use. The topography indicates steep hills, so there is virtually no chance that any views of the residences on the hillside would be affected. A townhouse development would be entirely appropriate on this type of parcel at this time. The design, landscaping and amenities of such a project would all serve to enhance the property values in the area. The previous rezone application was approved by every city department except the Planning Department. The Planning Department, as stated above, did approve an R-2 classification with the development by special permit. This is what the applicant is seeking. The proposed use of the property would meet the following community goals and objectives as stated in the comprehensive plan: 1. Prevent blight by protecting residential and other exclusive districts from the unwarranted infiltration of incom- patible uses which would contribute to premature decay and obsolesence, and prevent the development of orderly growth patterns . 2 . Increase community liveability by improving environ- mental factors which are closely related to the residential districts and other community areas. 3 . Protect property values within the community for the benefit of its residents and property owners, through the effective control of land use and the enforcement and application of building and construction codes. 4 . Promote the development of a viable, progressive community which provides ample opportunity for citizen participa- tion in a broad spectrum of economic opportunities, social achievements, educational attainments, physical development, and political activities. IMO 5 . Encourage the development and utilization of land to its highest and best use in such a way as to promote the best interests of the community and contribute to its overall attrac- tiveness and desirability of a place in which to work, shop, live and play. For all of the above reasons, the applicant respect- fully requests that the request for reclassification of the subject property be granted. DATED this / day of )nciA.f1 , 1980 . Respectfully submitted, MAY CREEK ASSOCIATES By —(L-7 ` / 1 , • REVENUE STAMPS ra PIONEER NA MAI b TITLE INSURANCE THIS SPACE RESERVED FOR RECORDER'S USE: idIc-i; •'V:, ATICOR COMPANY PION.; UFc,L! a•1 xtUth'J 1 Lts� i'VAT'L. Uc Filed for Record at Request ofpiekITL9 SECOND fL& INS' CO. ©� �/�✓,. � I,�TAVE, a�CF��I�D °� • 7979 MAR oN 9BIoi 7/.:Ss 6 AFTER RECORDING MAIL TO: /qr. 30 APR 2 1980 Pioneer National Title 'Insurance Company =�__._ _ .�� ee —'' '�� 10415 N.E. 12th _. �, ,P. n N. D 7D Bellevue , WA 98004 . _�n / ct / /// � 231923 CM 5 •so Pt- - Z3V 73 Lt ( D . . `�ro FORM L58 \� Statutory Warranty Deed THE GRANTOR HAZEL WILLIAMS BOEL , formerly HAZEL WILLIAMS, as her • separate estate for and in consideration of TEN DOLLARS AND OTHER GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION in hand paid, conveys and warrants to MAY CREEK ASSOCIATES , A Partnership the following described real estate, situated in the County of King • , State of Washington: • ., See Attached Exhibit "A" Subject to : Easements of record • F.dE. I ,e°,'Et'';F-^-gg; --f,�,__ f Ent�j. F i iA PAID' `l.. ? 1 T-~•.. f ; :Fr ,f, . rir°tea, :. -�;•ttn' io c .i:`a• °t""�L : =( 5 .b31' rtx _ , 7. --_1 D ; , 1` lk r _ .g :7-.) • PT.;OFT16,679 , 1 ".e, •L:a.7UTr _� ;v _ • '4-P.a.Me ''''''7 i -:•,- ---:^ air �.. of • . Dated.this . 19th , day of January , 1979 XI4aze Willis sIS El (SEAL) 0 • UTAH (SEAL) STATE OF msYI7bw Ss. County of CA-, - On this,day personally appeared before me Hazel Williams Boel • . • • to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that she signed the same as her free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned.GIVEN under my hand and official seal this 7/� ViL day of 9- ) 19N -4t efa c}6 i Notary Public in and for the State of Irica7iftifIR,XX • ' residing at I.{,(-talc. i ,� " `II1I I I qe ,,) i \ \ /7/4:'\. ckCkN , 0 , \ (6. t) ' 1 \ AVER 2 1980 IL )-\ \\ r .e z • r�l 00Y t•. „s \ }% 1e I\ I_ Jm`—__—J I �2.. .®. 5T _ 4/ II I a_ Roz 111 \ i i II TM.- `, o5.a..d iae iix ,i0 _ v /,,,el // 1 9/ ,,11 . ',‘ ": il 4 SI _,., L 600 1' l 7b, 5T s',/ I _/ rl' . y w a 1r.r31•'�I'.2a . / i / .52 1 ;y�Ld:zi lae ,s7 viz .. '1. • ' ) / t 1 1 /d. '/// 'i L 1 xe125 — �I ' (///// '. 7 'P ;. 9' z,_ , , , t �. �nj 1 tie �bs �J i50 sae .Wvy ..„, , ,,, • i : ///1''''. 1 1 r z 1 1 ' t . I ' t '1 / //:: ' I /r / r. 5 iIW G. 1 9 1 1 . I '. G 5 . a' /� / }f x Z 7 1 0 , 41I • } e ,,/i ///d, ,,. s\ 1 1,. %y 1,V lc :—./ __ -L— _ .._ — _-., - �' �Cr r ����- Set i �� II ' APPLICANT MAY CREEK ASSOCIATES TOTAL AREA 2 . 52 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via S . E . 76th Street and Lake Washington Blvd . N . E . EXIS1ING ZONING G-9600 , Residence Single Family ; B-1 , Business Use EXISTING USE One single family dwelling , remainder undeveloped . Multiple Family Housing PROPOSED USE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Medium Density Multiple Family , Commercial COMMENTS tc:2 IR < :.., . • . . t I i ------,\ / ; • \ i ; ..1--- / _____,''' ':••0 V \-.A, / _...----- -. _. / _ — —1— • • _., ,,, ,• ,, 4 „.:,,,Hii,,,....., 1 , ,,,,..,,,,.;..,„ •., ..4...0i 1. . 1 .../;-....aN, ii\ ')•05' . . \ I 6. CO / \. ' \ ‘ .I -- ,..,,...,..,,,,....,......,........., ...^:^(rtl'IP 1.41 f H ._ • . ., , ,.. 1 p,, • • t\^^ i 74-1444044 a • -•.-_,'• 0 1 t 4 ' i 4 ko„• .3 1- ..._.. 0 s ^.^\_—.• ,.•,'...,P0r, qI....,',./.,Ii • ^ " I 1 \ 12T I j 11 , _ ' ,, '.f,,,, , •:,',.?.3.1) ° -e „ ,,,.• „\ \ -.. \ \ -c} ' 1 . . \ 0;44,44,, t,„_,,l' , •, t :N'. * . • .`: .,(6 :.' / .., • , . ..,•- ,. 1 .. 1:•• \ N . 0 ,,,, 4 ks \e, -4- • N. \h. .---:--:- ''. .1' , I 4-) - . ' .-...N .., i i \`\ \N. 4 4 , ........\ . \ . • i • • ..... ' 'tr•e'._l.Ck_4V i ,,^ `‘.t,...„-V._...'.'.•'.'1'.+.m\_*'\,".•i1„..1-(‘,.1'..',•,.,1,,,..,-, -\ I \4 ..s .1 •'•,,. .:..4• •,N .(,;,•.i i e 4•,-„ ,'.n-1...••,-.-:4), •.0---- /(" f_ i:t'•:,+i.-'.,a0:..: gr4•N./1.,‘),,'D<'.'C(0;i-0.l 1,,•'':-':'i,.',,',',l',.._.• -.•','4 Tv • 2 \\ •V ..;•:. .'..I•1.,',1V;..4.,A,1I4,,:'.L;'111„.Z-1, .., .t. 0 - ' \ 0 • ) lq -z%,..,.% 4/4°•‘.•' 1 / ) , , ) . • ••1 . \ • .. ..- If t: •/ 7/ " - f • 1 0 0 ....__ cr ---' .p , ..., ,•,• . s ( + ,.;r911:( / 1 r.• .- . • FerZ• i, 0 .'. . ..., ,!: .,: - At -- \' ''' ...A r:1,;',,.•o .:, 00 ... , , ,q. ,, . 1.4i ---,. ,,•,., .. ___ ........_„4„..v - . ..,.:1 , / 1 i..L.„ - ( ',4 ia •,, 9- 4 t. ..z• . ..._. • . 4 ill, , . _ • a. i . _____ ... / / A, ,,, * - / .___ I r ..A I 11, • t L 1 i r• ,, / A ) 0 i.i, ... • ,:,... , 1.• • ..,,,•":.;--e:3,C1 5Abrili . if,! . \ '''I' .\ i.r '' •I -k S'( / , ....'''''..... ........ a..'• , .19 I '' • ,1•4 I ' 0 . . OSZ1' '6 / / 'i c) . . .• , _ . / \ ) ' / • e''''. \\\*. .?8 C),,,-./ ! nil ,,,....' • . • ..! . I . 1.' • . .. ems. __ �.+ i � ,� - e_..L. _ ------ >t� i '2. . � —�'_' -—- w�'iui""iiii141 r i�urat rlii �_ 01 �f_ - �# - — 11.111! 1i! 111 ,-- - wcz 4 !s ill' - = �- ■■ ';ii r Ri !.fill I . r s+ ii, III�/IfiQ& 111114i1 111/111111_114111mufia,tu.l...rnmru411 111111 1(�1 -' ■i R iT ; _ 1 ii'-"'I!- 01 1 ■I _ _ . I I . I I ' 1■ 1'Is II I II I 1 . • cl 0T-1 11 PC K 11 • • • �� • -GTibi-1 NI • /7.c) (.... \\:,•,..,-v. • t__________ ...__ ° O �8`' �,s,.°'� JI - -_- -- ..:1-1 OH C np- f V, j liNNMG,.-� • ------------ e� — - — gill , i ,is Yf r1A ,..5 ---- _ _ ,un�nmmlLI!!Ii �inn�lr . } rnlllnl — - _——_ f+ � > .'• Il1llNllliliiilit 111)NrllrgAllrlrllrltl1�ll11r11N `a- I: 1 !S�i��l'1 '�� 1, 1�IIt1 to ihtllllltetftilrill#!llltt/1#lflttlilll�IIINrI1N ko pi u�, !, 11j1�/�tit �>��I�'1 ih�13..�i.ngllfl 1� • l_____ ,. R - - ----- • �— rr imui K:. VIIrtIIII;IIIIIMIIIall l,111 IW'1# 's: i+r�tf�►s!''�1110i.r 1, !•ili ilmilllr�!!r!, • ' - ELT 1or-1 T� `, ,• ,- r� PA1 2 r F �1 ;b R �r SSo� , _ w v design , _ % --ram • © ` ) 9li, ,. NC?' a"iP�. ,.. / ,dam ago - an coo: opt SE 7 4.9 111. u 1 ® 1 1 ®t Is .1 X. - 1 IloSS 1 , , ...s>44k- ''•,, ` 1 C 50321� - ride 427 �: ,I ,r ' I . .... ..53,,,;) s ro�r1 ,., ,A, t1 �/ /� , Davos a • .13 0 ii �.—� "e'of"YC',,, ,,,,,,„/„::,,,,,.. .* 02,- ,, 1,,...ar I •O• i�0-Ai �'(N'la �_ , , , ,, , ; , %4• / , . /; `•. 1 1 1 1 Q 1 /� e�• 11 • it I6g >/ t x � fll1r II Q ol r i�f ' lit I'el ' SE 760--57`; `�`$' 1 e a D . 2 ' .. • ' igc 1 181. -...: o «� ��� 1 , e a .1 1 , �w s ,. im,.......... ( L...... _ . . . • . : . . . . , ,. . . 0 . : (S\ g-\\IEb (-() ' ql 5 U6,TEcT s!TE 1\ ' APR 2 1980 /NW cRcEK ffSSocl,4TE5 .e .. . ...-.-.-...-.... �z igEao4' No, a i a-78 44 NI�G DEj� PROPOSED/FINAL DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No . R-217-78 ® PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . 382-78 XX FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Applicant requests rezone from G-9600, Single Family Residence District, to R-3, Residential Multiple Family Proponent MAY CREEK ASSOCIATES Location of Proposal On Lake Washington Blvd. N.E. adjacent to and noth of S. E. 76th S1 Lead Agency Renton Planning Department This proposal has been determined to ❑ have Q not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS ❑ is is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was d ma a after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the .lead agency . non- Reasons for declaration of envi ronmentalAsi gni f i cance : This declaration is for the rezone request only and does not apply to any specific development plan. This declara- tion is based on further environmental review at time of site development, reduction in site density, retention of significant natural features of site, provision of adequate buffers and site landscaping and screening, together with other developmental controls. Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a ( proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official GORDON Y. ERICKSEN Title PLANNING DIRECT Date 10-6-78 Signature City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 < �� o f 4r 41) 1111 PROPOSED/FINAL DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/NON—SIGNIFICANCE Application No . R-217-78 • PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-382-78 X FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Applicant requests rezone from G-9600, Single Family Residence District, to R-3, Residential Multiple Family. Proponent MAY CREEK ASSOCIATES Location of Proposal Lake Washington Blvd. N. E. adjacent to and north of S.E. 76th Street. Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal has been determined to 0 have 0 not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 11 is is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) ( c ) . This decision was ma e after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : (1) Growth inducing impacts of a use of this intensity in an area developed only sparsely with scattered single family homes. (2) Potential adverse traffic impacts in the area in light of the lack of full street improvements for Lake Washington Blvd. in the subject area, and none are expected for between 4 and 6 years. (3) Adverse land use impacts of a use of this intensity introduced into this sparsely developed area. (4) Noise impacts of FAI-405 and Lake Washington Blvd. along with the necessary mitigation. Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to .such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its' declaration of significance and issue a ( proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Reduction of residential density to R-2 (11 units per acre) and retention of natural amenities and 'other development techniques to mitigate the above impacts. N 7 o Responsible Offici 1 Gordon Y. Ericksen l NA11NG Ti tl e Plan n D' ctor Date December 4, 1978 Signature City of Renton Planninn flonarrn,on+ 1 \\ AlIt ... . . / . ,to, .1, ,, - 4\ Yi ,,,,4i..N1-04/ - • • , G.60,•a,..„.1 \\ .J...,„)J\ .,..I ../'• . • . 1 . 4 0 µ.1 i /R4"�� r i::. , 4.ii,, . ,....,,,//_ �' /'/ 9600 /1 /1!•,, _''._ 1 -- L -----}` ST- , .(/ ; / I ( I /// / 1///,' ' .0/. 1 ,• 7 i ••• 41 ,‘ :',....:,!;:. ,a8 ,VI •St. ' I i r 1. / 10 '! IT - } I . ,...> .P IS 0 .49 " .:k.p.":'.':'.:41.!...r.'.1 1 iii :...mad• 1 %/ •(tr•(('' • ! ,II 11 L + I i H / S _ , i ``,ll r':r• '�..� III Pt , 4 L 1 1 C ‘ k , . .' ,_....,,..„,„, ---.... ,..... i, L, - .., i, I.I o• I .ip600 Q.' '/�'' /,. ,'„ ` 111.111111.21 .:: II - ! j� . • +'ry y :c O G 1 (a� i i 1 • - i 1,1/3 5 • '.. . . 6 \ ,'/;, 79 �1+d@l-ff��l!a�1Tr1..y� 4 97 •II .,� r i• , D ':\ tI• 7 /471 1.,�ill� T,,1If� ',�I T-1.T}D II -, oz ��,„�TIi ?.L:II]1:_: ,a, aa..s - .ryltia�s�-_.�i+,�1.:�..•a.1 �saatiae•a..a_t 1 • , SEA-BELLE PROPERTIES I ' i SP-402-79 ! . , t �`. .... ..._ . , l Sea-Belle Properties TOTAL AREA ±3 07 acres f APPLICANT_ I • Via Lake Washington Blvd. NE and NE 44th Street ; I i PR INC11,!AL ACCESS EXI S1,lNG ZONING_ B-1 Business Use } Undeveloped EXISTIING ItSE r Fill and Grade of approximately 22,500 cubic yards I f'R0PO5'EU USE _____� .......... , 1 1 COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN commercial i COMMENTS _ _____ .I 1 ENDING OF FILE FILE TITLE 10 Otaai 41" • / A r 14 ) 1dr, 4