Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA89-120 • IQ yD m x 03 yV� S m x as 0 VT 5111 RAY TERRY rr ARCHITECTS ROBERTSON AVIATION REVISIONSjpe A� "ME P.O.w:7l0 SITE PLAN (o LAKEWOOD,WA 08250 41 • • par \ LOHN%i �PO� �PIV�❑IL1 'fRKCL/bi"W u4 • ifv uu.+rrsnuP - hrWmv ow:INa/cticL�t - TJI/6-g1LT 61LpGlflipr _ • ZIUIET -� �y-y�-/��-/[y.ma ___ _-- _- —_ a•• u \ y�9�7T `\ GFJ4NL ,:itt,'R 4 �2..A.V(jG. .J . . i".a...,"2grucc ,,y SI QIR --, U ❑ ❑ .. �71I4y �� JI/6rRUGT. �pLYWPCOp�bfY4/-T _ _ - _ MI f.N WUIWt?1 —� �+ I`.Il .Ntg 1 Uo Nf ❑ 3y4rFp Miy '-_ 2Ni a 1I°OL E v.1W "4W& I qnN j� aN • � \ yU.¢ E eYYYiVkW aIL •g ❑ ❑ Iis s. ..:/��y \ I'. i,ILr - S� ll >IIdL Y K__'ep�..l�E R"m , M..- S y�y�"wwo "__ �. ROOF PLAN SECIOWM Q s Y$'-1'-D^ 1/4'=1� zt O i 4,14g.gat T4a sm oe.TN-LOR><I 411.1.11111111111M. M_ -- - Fe,1un�5nf III e �wieWf - N..- - - A. - _ _ 19 -- - 1 -'-'N 1 AMMON I! 5 @ o • © o 0 oi© o o ©i © 1 - a� W • o[MVP F i l' l' � �I III FF _.i • _ y /i� 'iIl'i'IIiA/ 'iI11 ` FP. m� • 1 p pll 11 I j I 'r, il� —iI � � ouommemEL • . .. iiinil , cr CHECKED_ - E WEST ELEVATION }f. r - MA' /4. %aro' 1/4`.e a' <Dd '• i r f—i • 4= � v rt,,,,,, C T. i —_,...,4 - i. )-- ,jT..t.. • � �j P �� �V . 8,-z,.'i • *--- .e#0$ 1)41 <r ' I 7 v. . ail, 4i> t i . , i - r R /t i_I iiikii. A 41> • O P Z > R I a. J ' ' V '1 1 -- _(LI _ N • '40 • • ,2A11 �°y 140 J'�l Cll�, 1 =ILL _ r• I _ I T i7� . • • (...,. . .il. . .. ._z. l y- g=; � S \,_ 12. K lea we • • o • f . E : —:. . -- f 1'4• 1 1 I 5. < =-1� _ TI �— b INN PM= IIIII� s1 c M 1=1-1�� �11111i'II_ tom- 124 € a �� !I II UIIHHIllnr L 4� ® _ \ - ®12 j`� r _ 7 I_ dl, - - dL' 3, i i$ „Th c 1-4 +Le <:) I ' 11,9° '\..e 1 4-.6 ••-e 1. �L P RAY TERRY "MAC r WINE REVISIONS + 1 RA ill! ARCHITECTS ROBERTSON AVIATION ADDITION I • - - AOUIU 21907 ECTH AVE W..WA 200 SMEEE TITLE — - ,� 11r,1 M(IUNRAKE iEtAi/+CE.Wn 900a3 '',:. - [906) FLOOR PU1N3/REFI ECiED CBUN(i PLANS , Illik,,, Y \ RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: _November 6, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: November 17, 1989 EFC - 120 - 89 APPLICATION NO(S) : Conditional Use, CU-120-89 and Shoreline, SM-120-89 PROPONENT:_Roberson Avivation Corporation PROJECT TITLE: Robertson Aviation Addition BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: _Application for a Conditional Use Permit and Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to allow the construction of a two story wood frame office addition to an existing building consisting of office and aircraft hangar space. LOCATION: 289 Perimeter Road East SITE AREA _0. 7 acre (28,986 sq. ft. ) BUILDING AREA (gross) : IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° 2 . Air ° 3 . Water ° 4. Plants ° 5. Animals ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° 9. Housing ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14 . Transportation ° 15. Public Services ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-120-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-120-89 and SM-120-89 PROPONENT: Robertson Aviation Corporation PROJECT TITLE: Robertson Aviation Addition BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for a Conditional Use Permit and Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to allow the construction of a two story wood frame office addition to an existing building consisting of office and aircraft hangar space. LOCATION: 289 Perimeter Road East TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 VICINITY MAP PROJECT DATA {{ ,,. ,.• LAKE WASNINOTO LOCATION: .289 Fn0r FERMI.Rmm'1 p80909,9A>g .0� )Cif ZONED: rueue.. R O O PROPOSED USE: lu — OCCUPANCY GROUP:UP: w ea „...... s SITE AREA:zo9e,sy F-r \+e a A \/nlI\ TIO1\Js BUILDING AREA: coot BouARe FEE a °ut SIESMIC ZONE: In 0\N u ADD.FT' IOI4 t4I CONSTRUCTION TYPE: 1N i ( 4T $ UBC EDITION: +985 �'q, a +I�SITE PARKING: [o AIRPORT WAY �\ rgwlcrn= ff • ' SOIL BEAFING i airiTt Yllrple or p rn CONSULTANTS Le NM STRUCTURAL ENGINEER — Im4AY G.AfIDfmO' • 4501 lam LA.71at — 6FA111E,YA 98115 Z OWNER _ SHEET INDEX F JawH wher; Al COVER sm./SS1E PLAN Tare.a ... A2 wpm P1A`6/RFRfslEO C ENG Purl G • Jal9ST -A7 yEI tS/S1LT1 /I]@ PLAN - -- 0QR AefnnalPa ROAD J AfNRi,wi4mm¢1 98055 M mans S1 EutoATlct:PIAWRIC TON Z O, $2 END LEVEL 9RN@c/ECGF 1RANEG OLij • $3 SHEAR WALL DETAL./6EETBER/'l9C C1 FA1.toms SYMBOLS GENERAL NOTES SITE PLAN 1•=20—o• a BUILDING SECTION -. All construction shall conform to the 198d Edition �tff N T4 Yl`+ SECTION IDENTIFICATION Q SECTION IDENTIFICATION of t e.rmeucca.av Co°"•etc or ma 1O-- ^•9b q t SHEET LOCATED ON �,—SHEET LOCATED ON n - M.°° iL�tjjl 1. All woos i contact with concrete masonry snap /sy Ee Cl) grade treated rood of any species or foundation i� I �+ / • 8 ELEVATON MARKER testing ceder or redwood, all marked by an approves I— . cc i WALL SECTION ci^g agency. o jj sSECTION IDENIIFICATION 3. Provide horizontal fireblmeking in all frame walls s \ � 3 W w SHEET LOCATED ON GRADE ELEVATION at lo•-a•on center and where!coma walla gene o49,—" z - 1 sY ,.0 1 / sr m E; ceilings. Pireblock in accordance with U.B.C.tSec. _ �'Vsi 'L� 1517 (f). ��f O>Ob % 0 VDETAIL DETAIL .Sy TOP OF WALL a. Bncloaaatao=ic spaces snnu be aiviaaa onto nori:onto! L dam' 'e b3� �' \I / r iCC 'y IDENTIFICATION .tY r en no oeeain , o fart fr ith tci IIVz � ou� I SHEET LOCATED IC areas not from the ceiling3000s sto quare f root with the 6,,10' , maximum dimension n o exceed 60 feet. Partitions ,R 7 \ Yard pW+'R' Ld d •` TOP OF CURB shall be 1n•gypsum board or 1/0.plywood. openings N�� l �gwF IMIlir •l in partitions shall be protected by self-closing doors. $ `PaRl-P /�:{�L". 91 INTERIOR ELEVATION „0- K 0t�• p�„�1�` tu+ u zNp _�� }„ A ELEVATION IDENTIFICATION 5. Building address to be posted o exterior face of 8 xly-lNU 1 B E" ysY7- 9 SHEET LOCATED ON building in letters and numbersn6 zor larger. L' 1 Q TOP OF PAVEMENT /ir • �, 1 �A ROOM NAME 6. Provide a floor of landing not greater than 1/2. �\ NEW l\ Cf,c,zn.,6) MOM ROOM NUMBER below threshold on each etas of all squires exits. / NAN6AE—� 1 },}1jy�^�. ' ROOM MATERIAL CODES —'—'— CENTER LIPS 1. Layouts shown for lease spoors err preliminary only A.(../ / ,� \ TTir s .o�"wsR• I at I 1st no.FfI��00RR��gggq55EE end aro for purposes of assigning addresses,deter- ! prmEnE SKI 2nd no VYALLS/WAINSCOT— —PROPERTY LINE mining exit requirements. and locating toilet rooms a r.., , �l litted as tenants are selected._. _CENTERLINE OF STREAM � o _ • �71 NEW CONTOUR NOTE. (o.ET• L/WWiC/.Q1H6 ry \ e�T �`a 1 °T 9. era,.Contractor to verify all dimensions. NUMBERS ON X-AXIS i r Er0(k yOV 'vK�y � zc✓ + nCw y$ el LETTERS ON Y-AXIS 75� .EXISTING CONTOUR 10. General Contractor responsible for all permits. All 0 ad 11II. �/���, �. r. }\ lb agm 11. General Contractor responsible ter all existing 'f�f 1 1p@v twaxcl[..o V�7�`_R�`? '':,s.-) / \ 1,p a•T W ?,_ DOOR SYMBOL condition dimension verification. titt .N cw.w.• `r a „ '�I r 4 f DOOR IDENTIFICATION 2 REVISION CLOUD •y' -�io �• B6To- y �86�st ro GOI...11, •r O WINDOW SYMBOL 5 6lss ag Q WINDOW IDENTIFICATION Hs, Q IDENTIFYING NUMBER • e' NEI MATCH LINE / „ 'b SHADED PORTION IS THE � -m„•mr.,z" u>;DlvS }y SIDE CONSIDERED LEGAL DESCRIPTION l�R ION ly . I ~e"� 't • -" LL .c..,caw....,.....c,a....o.L nee_rro ............................... i..E6END ______ avcr[wr scan, .onus...c c S� RlWT HAM!. SIl! —— _- — 1 l PROJECT 8919 JAIkt+A2�nmpa 4Y,k. —j lLCR-war BRAWN Br KJK o.nnA b HOHi.uN,DA0. 'SOs.L - - _ _\ �- — CHEESED • •- T3 RHpatOgtlO/o.2 ...uc' 4.,. CEDAR DATE .:o.c..�•"a.. ..:.".v'::RL. u.u, '4E..t9000 NA..Puc z.• '�4DAR RIVER 88+ RH.H,cKIHHIk i"Pm -rag a Q Al • 518:2• ...,...pw o.r«A. t..,.. a.......c.t,wI '.Ct::::.::. >;:: :>::::::;•., .••:•':':;: ?:3: >::: 5: is :: :'::;:`::;:`:''':: ::::::': '::::: ::': • On the ] day of Ma1r�1 , 19�� , I deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing, -1 ea EY,avvn,n.elr • documents. This information was .sent to: Name . Representing ohn ;T \« / � erk x cz_ UJS 11--- • • (Signature of Sender) S�,�,�4,� Subscribed and sworn to me this -7 fh, day of /14-ie-C/1 19 410 , No ary Public in and for the at State of Washington residing /7 OJ them .. .ec .. • xo ect ::.•;:.:.:::.::7::�::.:.::.:....:::....umber.-:....:.;...:...:. :::;:..;.::.. •. .:::.;;:.�::..;.:. ::::::::::.::::<:»>:<>:;:>::<::;<::<:•:;;;.;;:;;;:.;:.::.;:.:;_:.;;;;:.;::>:.>;•:<.;:�::::• '0 CITY OF RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J. Kaufman • April 10, 1990 Ron Lien 289 Perimeter Road East Renton, WA 98055 RE: Robertson Aviation File No. CU-120-90 Dear Mr. Lien: The Examiner' s Report regarding the referenced application which was published March 233 , 1990 has not been appealed within the 14-day period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is considered final and is being transmitted to the City Clerk this date for filing. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, X-4-e-ee ;4-2 (71-4-1-44-61---frs-7.42-7yry/ FRED J. KAUFMAN. HEARING EXAMINER FJK:dk cc: City Clerk Building Division Planning Division 200.Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2593 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. County of King ) DOTTY KLINGMAN being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: 23rd March That on the day of , 1990 affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this on1 Z, day of 1990. Notary Public and for the State_: of Washington, residing at , therein. Application, Petition, or Case #: CU-120-89 - ROBERTSON AV;ATION CORPORATION (The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) March 23, 1990 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: ROBERTSON AVIATION CORPORATION File No: CU-120-89 LOCATION: 289 Perimeter Road East ' SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of a two- story wood frame office addition to an existing building. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Division Recommendation: Approval, with conditions. PLANNING DIVISION REPORT: The Planning Division Report was received by the Examiner on March 6, 1990 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Division Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The hearing was opened on March 13, 1990 at 9:00 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow File containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Site Plan Exhibit #3 - Refined Site Plan and Vicinity Map Exhibit #4 - Elevation Map Exhibit #5 - Floor Plan for proposed Office Building The above exhibits were entered into the record and Senior Planner, Jeanette Samek-McKague continued with a presentation of the following information. The subject property is located at the Renton Municipal Airport (city-owned property). The request is compatible with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Map and is surrounded by airport uses and the Cedar River. All utilities are available to the site. In 1987,this project was brought before the city with a request for an office structure. As a condition of approval the applicant was to work to eliminate glare and light reflecting off the north window wall. The applicant redesigned the building but staff did not feel the redesign was done to meet the condition of reduced light and glare and required the applicant to resubmit a new application for consideration. In the meantime, the applicant has held on to the original approved conditional use permit and received an extension to that permit. The applicant was advised by staff that if this application is approved the previous application approval is null and void. It was learned the ERC reviewed this proposal and issued a determination of Non-Significance, Mitigated and conditioned the applicant to periodically water down the site to reduce dust during construction, provide a storm drainage plan and landscape plan to staff for their approval, and set up measures to ensure all construction debris is confined on the project site. Reviewing the conditional use criteria Samek-McKague stated the request is in keeping with the shoreline'policies of the Comprehensive Plant and there should be a 50 ft. setback from the edge of the water (which is being met by the applicant),'there should be some recreational amenities provided; the location is appropriate for this airport-related office use and will not create an over-concentration of f Robertson Aviation Corporation CU-120-89 March 23, 1990 Page 2 this type of facility in the area. It is anticipated there will_be no impacts to adjacent properties; the proposal meets lot coverage requirements; the use is compatible with other designs in the area; there is adequate pedestrian and vehicle circulation; the parking area has been redesigned to eliminate vehicles backing out onto Perimeter Road. All parking requirements have been met, there will be minimum noise and glare; there will be no children or business services located on the site. Planner McKague stated no erosion control plan will be necessary for this proposal due to the location of the office building. The Hearing Examiner said he feels either storm drain filters should be installed or some other provision made to 'take care of any mud and debris generated during construction, and thereafter. Considering the above information, and other information on file, staff is recommending the revised office structure be approved subject to the applicant complying with conditions set out by the ERC, designation of one parking stall for handicap parking and provide mitigation to prevent any,siltation in storm drains adjacent to the site and-placing a filter fabric on each side of Perimeter Road. Responding for the-applicant was Ron Lien,'289 Perimeter Road East, Renton, 98055. Mr: Lien said they will abide by the requirements of the city and understand if this application is approved the other conditional use permit will be null and void. He said the original plan from a three story building was changed after working with the Public Works Department to try to correct a problem with glare. At that time it was determined the solution would be to reduce the three stories to two. He had no further testimony. The Examiner called for further testimony-regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 9:25 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Robertson Aviation Corporation, filed a request for approval of a Conditional _ Use Permit to allow a'two-story addition to an existing building located on the Renton Municipal Airport. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance (DNS) for the,subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. There was no opposition from the public regarding the subject proposal. • 6. The subject site is located at 289 Perimeter Road East. The site is located in the southeast corner of the Renton Municipal Airport, just southwest of the Cedar River. 7. The site is part of the original plat of the City of Renton. The site has been zoned P-1 (Public/QuasiPublic) since the initial adoption of the Zoning Code in 1953. In 1987 the applicant received approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow a similar expansion, subject to certain conditions necessitating the need to reduce possible glare. The current request would replace that approval. 8. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of public and quasi-public uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the plan. 9. The airport area contains primarily airport related uses including hangars, airplane rental services,'repair services, air freight services and manufacturing. 10. The Renton Senior Center is located northeast of the site across both Logan Avenue South and the Cedar River. The Renton Stadium is also located across the river to the north. South of the site are a variety of uses including some light industrial uses, warehouses and Renton High School. 11. The applicant had previously received approval for a three-story wood and glass addition to the existing business. The applicant during the intervening years altered those approved plans and staff determined that a new conditional use application was required: Robertson Aviation Corporation CU-120-89 March 23, 1990 Page 3 12. The new plans call for a two-story addition that would infill an indented area of the existing structure and add an additional story to part of the existing structure. The building'area will be 4,004 square feet. 13. The addition will employ tongue and grove cedar siding and an overhung roof line. , 14. The building will be approximately 62 feet from the Cedar River and is subject to the city's Shoreline Master Program. The segment of the shoreline in this vicinity is classified as urban. Specific shoreline review in not part of this review, although staff noted opportunities for public recreation are limited on the airport side of the river, but are provided on the trail on the adjacent bank to the east. CONCLUSIONS 1. The applicant for a Conditional Use Permit must demonstrate that the use is in the public interest, will not impair the health, safety or welfare of the general public and is in compliance with the criteria found in Section 4-31-36 (C) which'provides in part that: a. The proposal generally conforms with the Comprehensive Plan; b. There is a general community need for the proposed use at the proposed location; c. There will be no undue impacts on adjacent property; d. The proposed use is compatible in scale with the adjacent residential uses, if any; e. Parking, unless otherwise permitted, will not occur in the required yards; f. Traffic and pedestrian circulation will be safe and adequate for the proposed project; g. Noise, light and glare will not cause an adverse affect on neighboring property; h. Landscaping shall be sufficient to buffer the use from rights-of-way and neighboring property where appropriate; and i. Adequate public services are available to serve the proposal. The requested conditional use appears justified. 2. Both the Comprehensive Plan and the Airport Plan suggest that the proposed use, an aviation related industry, is appropriate at the airport. The site is not only designated for public uses but also for airport related uses. The public designation on the Comprehensive Plan, in this case, is intended'to denote municipal ownership. 3. The office expansion does not appear to create an oversupply of airport related uses. In fact the type of use proposed is generally allied with an airport. Therefore, while similar uses are concentrated nearby, the criteria is not necessarily,relevant when reviewing airport related uses. 4. On the other hand, it might be possible to imagine that even some of the office functions of airport related uses could be located elsewhere. Since space is at a premium for hangars, outside storage tie-downs, other uses that need immediate access to the runways, or other intimately related airport uses, there could come a time when office expansions might be questioned. In this case, the limited expansion proposed does not appear to usurp the rather limited land around the airport for superfluous functions. The applicant is filling in an architectural void and adding space over an existing office thereby limiting the actual ground area usurped by office functions. 5. There should b no adverse impact on either adjacent uses or airport related functions. The earlier plan had an expansive window wall which would have been aesthetically pleasing if the applicant could have eliminated glare problems. The new design of the addition, while less aesthetic, avoids the potential problems of the earlier plan by limiting the amount of window glare that might be generated by the proposed use. The main component of the building will be' cedar siding. The overhung roof should also help limit the reflection of the sun off of windows or other building elements. 6. The two-story complex appears to be in scale with surrounding uses. While many of the uses are one-story, the additional floor will not be dramatically out of place at the airport. In addition, the two-story elevation will limit the loss of-valuable ground area used by less essential airport related functions, preserving the ground space for essential services. Robertson Aviation Corporation CU-120-89 March 23, 1990 Page 4 7. With property at a premium at the airport, yard requirements are limited. Perimeter Road is actually a private road serving the airport, and setbacks from it have not been observed as a general rule. The applicant has softened the appearance by providing some setback that will be landscaped. 8. The arrangement of parking on the subject site should limit maneuvering to the site and minimize maneuvering along Perimeter Road. A stall will have to be designed to accommodate handicapped parking per city standards. 9. The development should not adversely increase noise, light or glare. Construction noise will cease with occupancy of the structure. Again, the design of the roof line should limit adverse glare. 10. The applicant has worked with the city's landscape architect to provide suitable plant species, that while softening the appearance of the complex from the Cedar River, do not contribute to hazards by growing too tall or attracting birds to the flight path. 11. The site is served by adequate public services including water and sewer lines. Storm water drainage is subject to approval of the city since the site drains to the Cedar River. Oil/water separators are required. Silt screens may be necessary during construction to avoid pollution of the river. DECISION The Conditional Use Permit is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant comply with the conditions imposed by the ERC. 2. The applicant comply with the Parking and Loading Ordinance and provide a suitable handicapped stall. 3. The applicant comply with the requirements of the Public Works Department in managing torm water, and install silt fences or other methods to control runoff during construction. ORDERED THIS 23rd day of March, 1990. +14-54- FRED J. KA MAN HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 23rd day of March, 1990 to the parties of record: Ron Lien 289 Perimeter Road East Renton, WA 98055 TRANSMITTED THIS 23rd day of March, 1990 to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Lynn A. Guttmann, Public Works Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ken Nyberg, Community Development Director Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Larry M. Springer, Planning Manager Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Ronald Nelson, Building Director Traffic Engineering Division Brent McFall, Administrative Assistant Kim Scattarella, Engineering Specialist Valley Daily News Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 P.M. April 6, 1990. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This review shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner, may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. Robertson Aviation Corporation CU-120-89 March 23, 1990 Page 5 An appeal to the City (Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 16, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. • • • . • 1 1 • - ' I ' I I i - • '... I. i•b.,. :lb. ev r 44 . 45 4_46 4 s •'•'•, r.4 W IV' S T 14t...vg s, I '-j ' ' 3 1 • 's:j.; Ish 1 • . AEI \. '.. /.N .. • lj I 1 ...s , wiZ54$ ... .,•8 r 4 s 2 a 71....Sg v.,Y.' N W ,f_z_-4"!-• ' Pt. 53.,. .------- VAC • •w i PI f.(° 1 ,r1!2.,,d.,„41 %.6 ....woo : . -. N•q),.,,.. . ./A\ . • • . .. 1 il •••• -•. ' . ! ! • '...'-- . 1 .,,;- . ,, • ,t ------"-- 4 , •-;-- - ' . /',< --- _ I.7 V.7,, „., .>, IT..' Z is ,A w•..1,1 .:(n ....e9;r• . N \ 1 / '<>,,,/ • . I . ' t I • I 1 :,•••••••-• c-7.+` - . LI -T1 ET) •__. V' . • . 1 I.1, , • 1 7- ' 1 I Imo .; . 1 I i, ..s , I. I IP —.,H. R- 1 , . • p.„. i NO• 1 * . ,,J --.G. , _I _ -----: 7.4*• it., naii...... I ;.-Tobirq 5 bib •''`...:` . . CC - \ i '• J . k i., \ .. .:______. ird .fth, . • , 7- •_____i_ 1— ; . i 1 • • ...0,2 a .6., 7.......„ •-• . . -•-_-• \ . .. _.,._•___1(ii... .I . . 0, - r------j • In • '..a 1 -31-1 , 1 ; • . seN,orR JuNtorz• • _.: . : . 1 HIGH WON ' . _310 3 ..... : , .1]_i___ *. . IT . .. :.5,...).0t. SCHOOL A'.1 .-. . .... 1..;, .— 3. __ _ 4...2 ......tosi...,, • , ...,.. itc34‘ 1-7-7-3-i:. , ti,,,,p-r-.:•", .. h ..•. ' ' . .'!. .1-.-- 7:--- .'. S W VW-14. ' •- i I -, •t 5 • J . .. ...., _.. .._ . • ,-2 5 ','‘71 . rm, - ,f-/4, ,........ , -:`, ; _...3 ---7 • TSirSt%al) 11',Iiir R1'.: ..,• -3 ----- .7'. 4,-c .• ' ...- "n 4-• i---- f r • -, T air,-T 11 :,1•, ,4 r•,,/ , •••••.--......--.. . i 7 a , N • 7...9 • ,..; - •,I ' - :,',:,;.,i,1,1641,h1,..1,i -.--__ - , r .1 ..•,40;„,°./...,'•,•.]---,t, ,-, 3,4D -----p ---C-------" ------ I 1 H. ‘,„,1,11,...1 • si, ,i iv. • tri, ui . ,, , -4--.7•14- 7 ••11.... .. \ -- __-_ .3-.:..-- 171-- n MI 1•.;Al:I, ,s '1::: .2:I D. :II ' • " i •:-• •" •IP' 411111. i (Th \ I. a _ -.J, 11.1 '0 . ' • ----• ' ,— __La. ,12,i•- .Ljt,' - - . . ...- • ' .c.---r,. 1 • R.-.. , / x \ \ • \ i• '': ------ , WU/ - iii -• ••-. -1 •. __ ii,id ./•-• __2,.., .. _ ' < .. .:..... .-- 1? . ' 7 ...,, Le— i • „.._( \\,, \\ G•_„ \\ . .•__::.,.4, ,. . . . _.. ...., ,..„..,... •-.T.,•iii• r,-- c•••' 7-7, , ..,. ,9 2. \ \ 0 \ • c, . • . \ \ A ,,--,Ca '-'L % \ • • '- (41' .11.4.1 ,c 7 •.:.,rs c", .: : L. rt,. .. r 74 .... il-1 : -,-•ligf . .. --c..... N".c ..\ •-rz, , \ cp., _ \ \ -2_ \ • ., ---- -:-:.___, ' -' :.-- -C . .........ri lag, i. , v. -4, 11-9 2. H,.. ...... .ri 4 '4-1-1-;., ,n ,..-----,c.,' ..• ..,--j . z iT- CO k—sl.,, . .. .1 __ -rr \ \ \ •-., , • , ...,.. -.--;,,o- ...„...• '..i.'•.4 -----—. ---- t . . T-- • - -L.- -. 1.tt:TiE.10i-th.ri'--i S. [i='-17.- ''''' . ..:' • • - . • Robertson Aviation Corp. • • CU, SM,ECF-120-89 . . • • • • • . . • . APPLICANT Rnhprtqpn Aviafii On Corp. TOTAL AREA 28 986 • s,F , PRINCIPAL ACCESS Perimeter Road East • EXISTING ZONING Public Use . . •• EXISTING USE Aircraft Hangers and Office PROPOSED USE Aircraft Hangers and Office COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN COMMENTS Located at 289 Perimeter Road East . . • • • S. .• '.2 gri0 .23-ro ,.--2 1 ' il-5-c--Ixa 1.p.; ' i----- ___It.,.._ _ ' MI f�N - �° EICI. a . . I 13411I I ,. ,,_ ,. . - 43-An-, •s, . - .---1 nn NinYD. --, tci 5e �naN ti:N L� 2�2 r X 4'''ig,ill,-_ *A\ 7------7 : c:: CX:ttiIa %PrWiern *alir y lr tr} f -: opppr- • s }t¢bW �� • 77 111E1114 j f � 3F{t!t •r� l 3kiA a� �r�F:1 q r . y• 101 ..0000000 ' eas oiazitrn 1 " 1:*\\:_i AO* del',- (4. ,0\4„..\6 _ . — (it- f-J r,, ,,,4 \_j,.,i\i.v.,4_). \ . .. {.30._.(i_\,-,12 . c. . cp... ..2—_______ ‘,1 ,.. , . .. !-;..,1--5 \. cb....x. w -�'x �� �N�ti�`� ,t-cd ch � ''/` — P�r/- r�r r \\I\ . , -• ' ; • '7.17 W.P9 \ ------ ___________---' ‘ ;:°s ti Ada hP "'' p, O '` • • (I °111111 itz 1 • fi ni _ Livi iiiiirti' • er' -/-- -' LIar+71N4 ro11LI1�unu 7X5 ,rp gews 1 2S N11�111! '',rN� i,,I. t , r 1 111/11/111 I QJI li 2ND FLOOR REFLECTED CEILING PLAN ,�� ,1ST FLOOR REFLECTED CEILING PLAN • • -0r 4''tonGRL'fE \MEM NW (ro • J II I -F yi-0 z ' " gO-d 2o-d , o IJ-a .i-fl O-10" 4-4" N-Z" ro,xl5ts/.0 y 3-0riot lo-p. } a� 7 , � )� • y `t Yca 17' 7• PI 1 ��� ��r 7 n — ' y I Z6. "c. N Y✓u` .O OT I a. - ` �lo -� ml I Q •I g�— .� �▪ p L WAITING/6 -YISYG6•X.` I -- -�r ' CI V I• ON NY } -RYo.vwl - LTO " "a I 'i S 1 IsmsAV cE r— e i N l • I LC4 • Il1 Q ,-• I ExISTK'+ Z 1 _ _,I I . 4 I tI— CCl l I zNT yr • _ II 14 $ l- 4N I F I u�y J1 D4EJ4 <a D,7 oub �a I CFFlCE 'C> C I L 4 a �� • I j IA E l5i OF-FIC.� I R � �, 01 i,! ..p _ _ t_ I F- nl W,JI I ' l+ ' I I I I • '. .„ 1��I 1 f aP i M� *. Cr U WI R t , -M ` I'1 I l i r I 1 I_I r I -_ Sr 11 ��s,'Irvs�,.a 1 Nw.-�rP 2 a • W '_ 1I 1_ w� pew `y / _ 1 `�cvET i s.m� __ '/ E1 ? } JC V z 'Ay,/ d-"�- EYis?. 3 C I I > $ 7i. 1' _` >. I:I SS Q{}.IO,L 4h-T.4a.c i. �" T KSYla i` N.tTLH Fist KHLL C AlSf. , `�c�.c� \ 3'L IY 3'-I" ��.1 Ni `l I next AIMIIIMINIIIIIINEW �.. .�-ZMN9C © i 5 l u�II I HAT, Cod I _ 171 4P 0 I vwwccr "'. I c I 0.»,+ 9Y K.)e J }-- t cxa,w CT SECOND FLOOR FLOOR PLAN FIRST FLOOR FLOOR'KM A2 1#UuvAa l al F(alb1f , .��� yid N011d/�'L�iSaM N1 • O2YJ5HJ 1 �y,�rorr III 1 111.I' ; ,t111!11111Hi O •© O O \\\ l I�i'il !'i ll! ' I : II ------"'''.'1 i';1' 1 ii [ - F. { ��; i Ili; ii;�i , ;,j'Ii `\\ �i�!!ll ;M1 I ;;;;{,' I. Il, j11i'i ,'33 li• / • ID i .� iili;! i. ! i I L_ ii .i!' ;III li" 1^ •• [i i)! I'I I I i 1 1 ,14 . 1!1 i1_+! ;u�Ii,, / I 1il li ,A—Na!,-, ia-1tJm-vtau ixs' /. ' o f a-*r"yQK�ibq.�.. ii �TJayi a Y' I .01 WI g4 W NOli32S Mild dOOH " , \,\ 1Od Pd 7ev.cY, • _� - L r t _.a, �., ���: � • 11 Mom' . 5� yy \ iV • I T .Jf'.U1�1%'3 9Ff•9.4�J .'infl \ r\ 1 7.o,�n�z I w r7 \; o ! • �[ r • r.ar.,rv.rrra {��` l�naua/ir•Jj!/ ax+zu�/irj \�C ^+in _ r �•'� i,n •I. i= ab.�9n.z-- \' • l i Yi.5�I i nnnre� j � fir/--+�ay�-��,.y,C /v/a�a/Ha.71: \\ o LN • • L/• I ia,us/ml ,- - ------ ------ •\\ 1 • L'rra+>/aHib-no aooru4 drams.u+r� "'M a1,'scvi�'%"JnnlvnIT.iN so m. i,v13u1ns \ yy rs' w onuo� t.r. Name of Project PUBLIC HEARING Date Page 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT: Robertson Aviation Corporation FILE NUMBER: ECF; SM; CU-120-89 LOCATION: 289 Perimeter Road East A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Application for a conditional use permit and shoreline substantial development permit to allow the construction of a two-story wood frame office addition to an existing building. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: City of Renton John, Terry, and Julie Lien, Lease Holders 2 . Applicant: Robertson Aviation Corporation 3 . Existing Zoning: Public Use, P-1 4 . Existing Zoning in the Area: Light Industrial, L-1; Heavy Industrial, H-1; and Business Use, B-1. 5. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Public/Quasi Public Use. 6. Size of Property: 28,986 sq. ft. 7 . Access: Perimeter Road East. 8 . Land Use: Aircraft hangers and associated office. 9 . Neighborhood Characteristics: North: City of Renton Airport. East: Renton High School Stadium. South: Auto repair shop. West: City of Renton Airport. C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date This site is part of the original City of Renton plat and was zoned P-1, Public Use in 1953 when zoning was first adopted in the City. Conditional Use CU-020-87 N/A August 11, 1987 Shoreline Sub. Dev. SM-003-87 N/A November, 1987 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities 1 Name of Project PUBLIC HEARING Date Page 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT: Robertson Aviation Corporation FILE NUMBER: ECF; SM; CU-120-89 LOCATION: 289 Perimeter Road East A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Application for a conditional use permit and shoreline substantial development permit to allow the construction of a two-story wood frame office addition to an existing building. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: City of Renton John, Terry, and Julie Lien, Lease Holders 2 . Applicant: Robertson Aviation Corporation 3 . Existing Zoning: Public Use, P-1 4 . Existing Zoning in the Area: Light Industrial, L-1; Heavy Industrial, H-1; and Business Use, B-1. 5 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Public/Quasi Public Use. 6. Size of Property: 28, 986 sq. ft. 7 . Access: Perimeter Road East. 8 . Land Use: Aircraft hangers and associated office. 9 . Neighborhood Characteristics: North: City of Renton Airport. East: Renton High School Stadium. South: Auto repair shop. West: City of Renton Airport. C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date This site is part of the original City of Renton plat and was zoned P-1, Public Use in 1953 when zoning was first adopted in the City. Conditional Use CU-020-87 N/A August 11, 1987 Shoreline Sub. Dev. SM-003-87 N/A November, 1987 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities Name of Project PUBLIC HEARING Date Page 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT: Robertson Aviation Corporation FILE NUMBER: 'ECF; SM; CU-120-89 LOCATION: 289 Perimeter Road East A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Application for a conditional use permit and shoreline substantial development permit to allow the construction of a two-story wood frame office addition to an existing building. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: City of Renton John, Terry, and Julie Lien, Lease Holders 2 . Applicant: Robertson Aviation Corporation 3 . Existing Zoning: Public Use, P-1 4 . Existing Zoning in the Area: Light Industrial, L-1; Heavy Industrial, H-1; and Business Use, B-1. 5. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Public/Quasi Public Use. 6 . Size of Property: 28, 986 sq. ft. 7 . Access: Perimeter Road East. 8 . Land Use: Aircraft hangers and associated office. 9 . Neighborhood Characteristics: North: City of Renton Airport. East: Renton High School Stadium. South: Auto repair shop. West: City of Renton Airport. C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: " Action File Ordinance Date This site ,is part of the original City of Renton plat and, was zoned P-1, Public Use in 1953 when zoning was first adopted in the City. Conditional Use CU-020-87 N/A August 11, 1987 Shoreline Sub. Dev. SM-003-87 N/A November, 1987 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities PRELIMINARY REPORT TO TI, ELEARING EXAMINER a. Water: A twelve inch water main runs along Perimeter Road East. An eight inch water main runs north of the subject site. b. Sewer: , A six inch line runs south of the subject site and a Metro trunk line runs to the east of the site. c. Storm Water Drainage: Storm water. drains in a northerly direction and flows into a 24 inch concrete drain pipe which empties into the Cedar River. 2 . Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3 . Transit: This site is not served directly by Metro transit. The nearest transit service is on Logan Ave.. South or Airport , Way. Metro routes 109 and 245 run along these streets. 4 . Schools: N/A 5. Recreation: N/A E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-710, Public Zone (P-1) . 2 . Section 4-748, Conditional Use Permit. F. 'APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Central Renton Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986 (pgs. 61-67) . 2 . Transportation Goal, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986 (pgs. 19-22) . 3 . City of Renton Shoreline Master Program, 1983 . G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. The 'applicant, Ron Lien, seeks approvals for a conditional use permit and a shoreline substantial development permit to allow the revision of the office structure approved for a previous conditional use permit application (Ref. File CU-020-87, SM- 003-87) . The previous application was for a three (3) story office wood and glass structure consisting of 2 , 160 . square feet with a 7, 386 square foot hangar addition. The applicant has submitted the conditional use application a building permit in 1989, for the subject building. The Planning staff, in comments on the building permit noted a new conditional use permit would be, required to accomodate the revised building structure. The applicant was proposed the revised building design in response to comments in the Hearing Examiner's Decision for the approved conditional use permit. Conclusion No. 4 reads in part "The applicant will work with staff to assure that the glass windows do not reflect or generate. too. much glare. " The report went further with a condition of approval which read "The applicant is to work to eliminate unnecessary..glare and light from reflecting off of the north window wall. " Staff determined that the redesign of the building was not the intent of the condition to reduce light and glare from the north wall. Therefore, the applicant was informed that the approved building design using a method to subdue the impacts of the glass wall could be built or submit a new application for the revised building. The applicant chose PRELIMINARY REPORT TO Tl. HEARING EXAMINER • a. Water: A twelve inch water main runs along Perimeter Road East. An eight inch water main runs north of the subject site. b. Sewer: A six inch line runs south of the subject site and a Metro trunk line runs to the east of the site. c. Storm Water Drainage: Storm water drains in a northerly direction and flows into a 24 inch concrete drain pipe which empties into the Cedar River. 2 . Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3 . Transit: This site is not served directly by Metro transit. The nearest transit service is on Logan Ave., South or Airport Way. Metro routes 109 and 245 run along these streets. 4 . Schools: N/A 5. Recreation: , N/A E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-710, Public Zone (P-1) . 2 . Section 4-748, Conditional Use Permit. . F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Central Renton Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986 (p.gs. 61-67) . 2 . Transportation Goal, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986 (pgs. 19-22) . 3 . City of Renton Shoreline Master Program, 1983 . G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. The applicant, Ron Lien, seeks approvals for conditional use permit and a shoreline substantial development permit to allow the revision of the office structure approved for a previous conditional use permit application (Ref. File CU-020-87, SM- 003-87) . The previous application was for a three (3) story office wood and glass structure consisting of 2 , 160 square feet with a 7, 386 square foot hangar addition. The applicant has submitted the conditional use application a building permit in 1989, for the subject building. The Planning staff, in comments on the building permit noted a new conditional use permit would be required to accomodate the revised building structure. The applicant was proposed the revised building design in response to comments in the Hearing Examiner's Decision for the approved conditional use permit. Conclusion No. 4 reads in part "The applicant will work with staff to assure that the glass windows do not reflect or generate too much glare. " The report went further with a condition of approval which read "The applicant is to work to eliminate unnecessary glare and light from reflecting off of the north window wall. " Staff determined that the redesign of the building was not the intent of the condition to reduce light and glare from the north wall. Therefore, the applicant was informed that the approved building design using a method to subdue the impacts of the glass wall could be built or submit a new application for the revised building. The applicant chose PRELIMINARY REPORT TO Tl; "HEARING EXAMINER a. Water: A twelve inch water main runs along Perimeter Road East. An eight inch water main runs north of the subject site. b. Sewer: A six inch line runs south of the subject site and a Metro trunk line runs to the east of the site. c. Storm Water Drainage: Storm water drains in a northerly direction and flows into a 24 inch concrete drain pipe which empties into the Cedar River. 2 . Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3 . Transit: This site is not served directly by Metro transit. The nearest transit service is on Logan .Ave., South or Airport Way. Metro routes 109 and 245 run along these streets. 4 . Schools: N/A 5. Recreation: N/A E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-710, Public Zone (P-1) . 2 . Section 4-748, Conditional Use Permit. F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Central Renton Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986 (pgs. 61-67) . 2 . Transportation Goal, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986 (pgs. 19-22) . 3 . City of Renton Shoreline Master Program, 1983 . G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. The applicant, Ron Lien, seeks approvals for a conditional use permit and a shoreline substantial development permit to allow the revision of the office structure approved for a previous conditional use permit application (Ref. File CU-020-87, SM- 003-87) . The previous application was for a three (3) story office wood and glass structure consisting of 2, 160 square feet with a 7, 386 square foot hangar addition. The applicant has submitted the conditional use application a building permit in 1989, for the subject building. The Planning staff, in comments on the building permit noted a new conditional use permit would be required to accomodate the revised building structure. The applicant was proposed the revised building design in response to comments in the Hearing .Examiner's Decision for the approved conditional use permit. Conclusion No. 4 reads in part "The applicant will work with staff to assure that the glass windows do not reflect or generate too much glare. " The report went further with, a. condition of approval which read "The applicant is to work to eliminate unnecessary glare and light from reflecting off of the north window wall. " Staff determined that the redesign of the building was not the intent of the condition to reduce light and glare from the north wall. Therefore, the applicant was informed that the approved building design using a method to subdue the impacts of the glass wall could be built or submit a new application for the revised building. The applicant chose PRELIMINARY REPORT TO T] HEARING EXAMINER to submit a new application for the revised office structure. In addition, the applicant has also retained the right to build the original building through an extension of the original conditional permit granted by the Hearing Examiner in a letter dated July 20, 1989. 2 . Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, the Environmental Review Committee issued an amended Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the project on January 17, 1990 with the following mitigation measures: a. That the applicant periodically water down the site to reduce dust impacts during construction. b. . That the applicant ensure that sufficient measures are taken to confine all construction debris to the project site.' c. That the applicant provide a storm drainage plan acceptable to the Public Works Department which includes tightlining the roof drains and the installation of an oil/water separator. d. That the applicant provide a landscape plan to be approved by the City's Landscape Planner and Airport Manager which will reduce the visual impact of the use on the nearby trail system. 3 . Section 4 .478 (C) lists eleven criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider along with all other relevant information in making a decision on a Conditional Use application. These include the following: a. Comprehensive Plan: The proposed use shall be compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and any other plan, program, map or ordinance of the City of Renton. The proposal is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan Map designation of Public/Quasi-Public in that the proposal is a use which supports the needs of the existing Municipal Airport. In addition, the proposal does comply with the City's zoning designation of P-1, Public Use, which allows private sector uses by a Conditional Use Permit. The subject use also complies with the operating policies established for the Renton Municipal Airport. The proposal must meet the policies of the City of Renton Shorelines Master Plan. The Shorelines Program does not have specific policies related to the Renton Airport, even though the Airport has State shorelines on two of its boundaries - Lake Washington to the north and the Cedar River to the east. However, the policies appear to indicate that in areas other than Lake Washington, commercial developments may be allowed as long as such developments are located in areas of existing commercial development, that public recreational opportunities are incorporated, that impacts to the existing scenic view be minimized, and that buildings be set back fifty (50) feet from the water's edge. The project, as mitigated, does meet the policies of the Shoreline Master Program. Due to the unique situation of a Public Airport, public recreation opportunities are not allowed on the airport itself. The City has provided a recreational corridor along the east bank of the Cedar River, not along the west bank. b. Community Need: There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In the determination PRELIMINARY REPORT TO T. HEARING EXAMINER to submit a new application for the revised office structure. In addition, the applicant has also retained the right to build the original building through an extension of the original conditional permit granted by the Hearing Examiner in a letter dated July 20, 1989. 2 . Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, the Environmental Review Committee issued an amended Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the project on January 17, 1990 with the following mitigation measures: a. That the applicant periodically water down the site to reduce dust impacts during construction. b. That the applicant ensure that sufficient measures are taken to confine all construction debris to the project site. c. That the applicant provide a storm drainage plan acceptable to the Public Works Department which includes tightlining the roof drains and the installation of an oil/water separator. d. That the applicant provide a landscape plan to be approved by the City's Landscape Planner and Airport Manager which will reduce the visual impact of the use on the nearby trail system. 3 . Section 4 . 478 (C) lists eleven criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider along with all other relevant information in making a decision on a Conditional Use application. These include the following: a. Comprehensive Plan: The proposed use shall be compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and any other plan, program, map or ordinance of the City of Renton. The proposal is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan Map designation of Public/Quasi-Public in that the proposal is a use which supports the needs of the existing Municipal Airport. In addition, the proposal does comply with the City's zoning designation of P-1, Public Use, which allows private sector uses by a Conditional Use Permit. The subject use also complies with the operating policies established for the Renton Municipal Airport. The proposal must meet the policies of the City of Renton Shorelines Master Plan. The Shorelines Program does not have specific policies related to the Renton Airport, even though the Airport has State shorelines on two of its boundaries - Lake Washington to the north and the Cedar River to the east. However, the policies appear to indicate that in areas other than Lake Washington, commercial developments may be allowed as long as such developments are located in areas of existing commercial development, that public recreational opportunities are incorporated, that impacts to the existing scenic view be minimized, and that buildings be set back fifty (50) feet from the water's edge. The project, as- mitigated, does meet the policies of the Shoreline Master Program. Due to the unique situation of a Public Airport, public recreation opportunities are not allowed on the airport itself. The City has provided a recreational corridor along the east bank of the Cedar River, not along the west bank. b. Community Need: There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In the determination PRELIMINARY REPORT TO T] HEARING EXAMINER to submit a new application for the revised office structure. In addition, the applicant has also retained the right to build the original building through an extension of the original conditional permit granted by the Hearing Examiner in a letter dated July 20, 1989 . 2 . Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, the Environmental Review Committee issued an amended Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the project on January 17 , 1990 with the following mitigation measures: a. That the applicant periodically water down the site to reduce dust impacts during construction. b. That the applicant ensure that sufficient measures are taken to confine all construction debris to the project site. c. That the applicant provide a storm drainage plan acceptable to the Public Works Department which includes tightlining the roof drains and the installation of an oil/water separator. d. That the applicant provide a landscape plan to be approved by the City's Landscape Planner and Airport Manager which will reduce the visual impact of the use on the nearby trail system. 3 . Section 4 .478 (C) lists eleven criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider along with all other relevant information in making a decision on a Conditional Use application. These include the following: a. Comprehensive Plan: The proposed use shall be compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and any other plan, program, map or ordinance of the City of Renton. The proposal is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan Map designation of Public/Quasi-Public in that the proposal is a use which supports the needs of the existing Municipal Airport. In addition, the proposal does comply with the City's zoning designation of P-1, Public Use, which allows private sector uses by a Conditional Use Permit. The subject use also complies with the operating policies established for the Renton Municipal Airport. The proposal must meet the policies of the City of Renton Shorelines Master Plan. The Shorelines Program does not have specific policies related to the Renton Airport, even though the Airport has State shorelines on two of its boundaries - Lake Washington to the north and the Cedar River to the east. However, the policies appear to indicate that in areas other than Lake Washington, commercial , developments may be allowed as long as such developments are located in areas of existing commercial development, that public recreational opportunities are incorporated, that impacts to the existing scenic view be minimized, and that buildings be set back fifty (50) feet from the water's edge. The project, as mitigated, does meet the policies of the Shoreline Master Program. Due to the unique situation of a Public Airport, public recreation opportunities are not allowed on the airport itself. The City has provided ' a recreational corridor along the east bank of the Cedar River, not along the west bank. b. Community Need: There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In the determination PRELIMINARY REPORT TO T HEARING EXAMINER of community need the Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factors, among all other relevant information:. 1. The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental overconcentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. The proposed use of an office building will not result in the overconcentration of office space in the City due to the fact that the office. is for housing the business functions of an airport-related support service. It will not result in an overconcentration of office facilities in the Airport since the Airport Board oversees the development of the airport and must approve each use before new facilities are constructed or existing facilities expanded by additions. 2 . That the proposed location is suited for the proposed use. The proposed location is suited for the proposed use. It is located on the Airport with similar type uses. c. Effect on Adjacent Properties: The proposed use at the proposed location shall not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. The following site requirements shall be required: 1.. Lot Coverage: Lot coverage . in residential districts (R- 1 and R-2) shall not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the lot coverage of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Lot coverage in •all other zones shall conform to the requirements of zone in which the proposed use is to be located. The Public Use Zone does not specify a minimum or maximum lot coverage standard. 2 . Yards: Yards shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Additions to the structure shall not be allowed in any required yard. The subject proposal is located in a unique area of the City, that of the City owned airport. As such, there are strict controls established by the -City with respect to the roadways on the airport. East Perimeter Road is a private access roadway along the east side of the Airport. As with other uses at the Airport, there has not been a strict requirement for compliance with the front yard set back of 20 feet as required in Section 4,- 31-9 (D) (1) for "all other" types of roads. 3 . Height: Building and structure heights shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Spires, belltowers, public utility antennas or similar structures may exceed the height requirement upon approval of a variance. Building heights should be related to surrounding uses in order to allow optimal sunlight and ventilation, and minimal obstruction of views from adjacent structures. The office facility will not exceed the 50 foot height limit in the P-1 Zone and, in fact, will not exceed a height of 24 feet. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO T' HEARING EXAMINER of community need the Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factors, among all other relevant information: 1. The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental overconcentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. The proposed. use of an office building will not result in the overconcentration of office space in the City due to the fact that the office is for housing the business functions of an airport-related support service. It will not result in an overconcentration of office facilities in the Airport since the Airport Board oversees the development of the airport and must approve each use before new facilities are constructed or existing facilities expanded by additions. 2 . That the proposed location is suited for the proposed use. The proposed location is suited for the proposed use. It is located on the Airport with similar type uses. c. Effect on Adjacent Properties: The proposed use at the proposed location shall not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. The following site requirements shall be required: 1. Lot Coverage: Lot coverage in residential districts (R- 1 and R-2) shall not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the lot coverage of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Lot coverage in •all other zones shall conform to the requirements of zone in which the proposed use is to be located. The Public Use Zone does not specify a minimum or maximum lot coverage standard. 2 . Yards: Yards shall conformto the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Additions to the structure shall not be allowed in any required yard. The subject proposal is located in a unique area of the City, that of the. City owned airport. As such, there are strict controls established by the -City with respect to the roadways on the airport. East Perimeter Road is a private access roadway along the east .side of the Airport. As with other uses at the Airport, there has not been a strict requirement for compliance with the front yard set back of 20 feet as required in Section 4- 31-9 (D) (1) for "all other" types of roads. 3 . Height: Building and structure heights shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Spires, belltowers, public utility antennas or similar structures may exceed the height requirement upon approval of a variance. Building heights should be related to surrounding uses in order to allow optimal sunlight and ventilation, and minimal obstruction of views from adjacent structures. The office facility will not -exceed the 50 foot height limit in the P-1 Zone and, in fact, will not exceed a height of 24 feet. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO T HEARING EXAMINER of community need the Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factors, among all other relevant information: 1. The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental overconcentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. The proposed use of an office building will not result 1 in the overconcentration of office space in the City due to the fact that the office is for housing the business functions of an airport-related support service.. It will not result in an overconcentration of office facilities in the Airport since the Airport Board oversees the development of the airport and must approve each use before new facilities are constructed or existing facilities expanded by additions. 2 . That the proposed location is suited for the proposed use. The proposed location is suited for the proposed use. It is located on the Airport with similar type uses. c. Effect on Adjacent Properties: The proposed use at the proposed location shall not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. The following site requirements shall be required: 1. Lot Coverage: Lot coverage in residential districts (R- 1 and R-2) shall not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the lot coverage of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Lot coverage in •all other zones shall conform to the requirements of zone in which the proposed use is to be located. The Public Use Zone does not specify a minimum or maximum lot coverage standard. 2 . Yards: Yards shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Additions to the structure shall not be allowed in any required yard. The subject proposal is located in a unique area of the City, that of the City owned airport. As such, there are strict controls established by the -City with respect to the roadways on the airport. East Perimeter Road is a private access roadway along the east side of the Airport. As with other uses at the Airport, there has not been a strict requirement for compliance with the. front yard set back of 20 feet as required in Section 4- 31-9 (D) (1) for "all other" types of roads. 3 . Height: Building and structure heights shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Spires, belltowers, public utility antennas or similar structures may exceed the height requirement upon approval of a variance. Building heights should be related to surrounding uses in order to allow optimal sunlight and ventilation, and minimal obstruction of views from adjacent structures. The office facility will not exceed the 50 foot height limit in the P-1 Zone and, in fact, will not exceed a height of 24 feet. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO T HEARING EXAMINER d. Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood. (Ord. 3599 , 1-11-82) The subject proposal is compatible and . similar with the structures and uses in the surrounding area. The office addition is surrounded on three sides by the existing hangar structure. The materials and design is similar to that of other structures on the airport. e. Parking: Parking under the building structure should be encouraged. Lot coverage may be increased to as much as seventy five percent (75%) of the lot coverage requirement of the zone in which the proposed use is located if all parking is provided underground or within the structure. /Ord. 3903, 4-22-85) Not Applicable. f. Traffic: Traffic and circulation patterns of vehicles and pedestrians relating to the proposed use and surrounding area shall be reviewed for potential effects on, and to ensure safe movement in the surrounding area. The arrangement of the parking area does, for the most part, allow for safe vehicular and pedestrian movements. The applicant has arranged the parking to minimize manuvering on the applicant's site. Since we are dealing with a unique area, an airport site with private roads, we were concerned with manuvering onto East Perimeter Road as part of the backup space from the stalls in the site plan submitted for the previous conditional use permit. A condition of the previous conditional use permit approved for the site included the requirement for the applicant to work with City staff to design a parking area which minimized the potential for accidents and prevented manuvering of vehicles upon 'East Perimeter Road. The applicant has provided a 'sufficient number of parking stalls to meet the requirements of the Parking and Loading Ordinance (See Attachment A) . The applicant, however, will need to designate one of the parking stalls as handicap parking, with a dimension of 12 1/2' by 20' . g. Noise, Glare: Potential noise, light and glare impacts shall be evaluated based on the location of the proposed use on the lot and the location of on-site parking areas, outdoor recreational areas and refuse storage areas. There will be minimal increases in noise and glare as a result of the construction of 'this project. While the windows of the office addition may capture and reflect morning sunlight, there should be little impact due to the arrangement of the building with respect to uses across the river, particularly traffic along Logan Ave. North. There are no buildings which will be impacted by potential glare. With respect to noise, there will be a slight increase during construction but it will not adversely affect adjacent uses. h. Landscaping: Landscaping shall be provided in all areas not occupied by buildings or paving. The Hearing Examiner may require additional landscaping to buffer adjacent properties from potentially adverse effects of the proposed use. The applicant has provided a landscaping plan which is adequate. In fact, the applicant has worked with the City's PRELIMINARY REPORT TO T HEARING EXAMINER' d. Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood. (Ord. 3599 , 1-11-82) The subject proposal is compatible and similar with the structures and uses in the surrounding area. The office addition is surrounded on three sides by the existing hangar structure. The 'materials and design is similar to that of other structures on the airport. e. Parking: Parking under the building structure should be encouraged. Lot coverage may be increased to as much as seventy five percent (75%) of the lot coverage requirement of the zone in which the proposed use is located if all parking is provided underground or within the structure. (Ord. 3903 , 4-22-85) Not Applicable. f. Traffic: Traffic and circulation patterns of vehicles and pedestrians relating to the proposed use and surrounding area shall be reviewed for potential effects on, and to ensure safe movement in the surrounding area. The arrangement of the parking area does, for the most part, allow for safe vehicular and pedestrian movements. The applicant has arranged the parking to minimize manuvering on the applicant's site. Since we are dealing with a unique area, an airport site with, private roads, we were' concerned with manuvering onto East Perimeter Road as part of the backup space from the stalls in the site plan submitted for the previous conditional use permit. A condition of the previous conditional use permit approved for the site included the requirement for the applicant to work with City staff to design a parking area which minimized the potential for accidents and prevented manuvering of vehicles upon East Perimeter Road. The applicant has provided a sufficient number of parking stalls to meet the requirements of the Parking and Loading Ordinance (See Attachment A) . The applicant, however, will need to designate one of the parking stalls as handicap parking, with a dimension of 12 1/2' by 20' . g. Noise, Glare: Potential noise, light and 'glare impacts , shall be evaluated based on the location of the proposed use on the lot and the location of on-site parking areas, outdoor recreational areas and refuse storage areas. There will be minimal increases in noise and glare as a result of the construction of this project. While the windows of the office addition may capture and reflect morning sunlight, there should be little impact due to the arrangement of the building with respect to uses across the river, particularly traffic along Logan Ave. North. There are no buildings which will be impacted by potential glare. With respect to noise, there will be a slight increase during construction but it will not adversely affect adjacent uses. h. Landscaping: Landscaping shall be provided in all areas not occupied by buildings or paving. The Hearing Examiner may require additional landscaping to buffer adjacent properties from potentially adverse effects of the proposed use. The applicant has' provided a landscaping plan which is adequate. In fact, the applicant has worked with the City's PRELIMINARY REPORT TO T HEARING EXAMINER • d. Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood. (Ord. 3599, 1-11-82) The subject proposal is compatible and similar with the structures and uses in the surrounding area. . The office addition is surrounded on three sides by the existing hangar structure. The materials and design is similar to that of other structures on the airport. e. Parking: Parking under the building structure should be encouraged. Lot coverage may be increased to as much as seventy five percent (75%) of the lot coverage requirement of the zone in which the proposed use is located if all parking is provided underground or within the structure. SOrd. 3903 , 4-22-85) Not Applicable. f. Traffic: Traffic and circulation patterns of vehicles and pedestrians relating to the proposed use and surrounding area shall be reviewed for potential effects on, and to ensure safe movement in the surrounding area. The arrangement of the parking area does, for the most part, allow for safe vehicular and pedestrian movements. The applicant has arranged the parking to minimize manuvering on the applicant's site. Since we are dealing with a unique area, an airport site with private roads, we were concerned with manuvering onto East Perimeter Road as part of the backup space from the stalls in the site plan submitted for the previous conditional use permit. A condition of the previous conditional use permit approved for the . site included the. requirement for the applicant to work with City staff to design a parking area which minimized the potential for accidents and prevented manuvering of vehicles upon East Perimeter Road. The applicant has provided a sufficient number of parking stalls to meet the requirements of the Parking and Loading Ordinance (See Attachment A) . The applicant, however, will need to designate one of the parking stalls as handicap parking, with a dimension of 12 1/2 ' by 20' . g. Noise, Glare: Potential noise, light and glare impacts shall be evaluated based on the location of the proposed use on the lot and the location of on-site parking areas, outdoor recreational areas and refuse storage areas. There will' be minimal increases in noise and glare as a result of the construction of this project. While the windows of the office addition may capture and reflect morning sunlight, there should be little impact due to the arrangement of the building with respect to uses across the river, particularly traffic along Logan Ave. North. There are no buildings which will be impacted by potential glare. With respect to noise, there will be a slight increase during construction but it will not adversely affect adjacent uses. - h. Landscaping: Landscaping shall be provided in all areas not occupied by buildings or paving. The Hearing Examiner may require additional landscaping to buffer adjacent properties from potentially adverse effects of the proposed use. The applicant has provided a landscaping plan which is adequate. In fact, the applicant has worked with the City's PRELIMINARY REPORT TO 1 'HEARING EXAMINER landscape planner to improve the submitted landscape plan to address the condition of the environmental determination requiring additional landscaping to screen the site from the Cedar River trail located on the east side of the Cedar River. Landscaping for the airport is restricted due to the need to avoid hazards to airplanes including trees and birds (attracted to the airport due to habitat provided by the landscaping) . i. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses to conditional uses such as day schools, auditoriums used for social and sport activities, health centers, convents, preschool facilities, convalescent homes and others of a similar nature shall be considered to be separate uses and shall be subject to the provisions of the use district in which they are located. This condition is not applicable. j . Conversion: No existing building or structure shall be converted to a conditional use unless such building or structure complies, or is brought into compliance, with the provisions of this Chapter. This condition is not applicable. k. Public Improvements: The proposed use and location shall be adequately served by and not impose an undue burden on any public improvements, facilities, utilities and services.. Approval of a conditional use permit may be conditional upon the provision and/or guarantee by the applicant of necessary public improvements, facilities, utilities and/or services. The subject proposal is adequately served by public improvements, facilities, utilities, and services and will not require additional services. The Environmental Review Committee imposed the following condition as part of the Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated: "That the applicant provide a storm drainage plan acceptable to the Public Works Department which includes tightlining the roof drains and the installation of an oil/water separator" . 4 . Other agencies (D.O.E. , Fisheries, WSDOT, and METRO) have commented on the application. These comments are included in the file. The Department of Fisheries did note concern that the applicant did not have an erosion control plan required as part of the environmental mitigation. The ERC did. not impose such a condition since the Storm Drainage staff did not determine erosion would be an issue. By code, though, the City can require erosion control is conditions warrant such precautions being taken. 5. The project, as mitigated, will not be detrimental to the public interest. Therefore, the project should be approved. H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the application for Ron Lien, File# ECF; CU; SM-120-89, be approved subject to the following conditions':' 1. Compliance with the Environmental conditions imposed by the Environmental Review Committee and listed in the Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated issued in January 17, 1990 for the project. 2 . The applicantdesignate one of the parking stalls as handicap parking, with a dimension of 12 1/2 ' by 20' . PRELIMINARY REPORT TO 7 HEARING EXAMINER landscape planner to improve the submitted landscape plan to address the condition of the environmental determination requiring additional landscaping to screen the site from the Cedar River trail located on the east side of the Cedar River. Landscaping for the airport is restricted due to the need to avoid hazards to airplanes including trees and birds (attracted to the airport due to habitat provided by the landscaping) . i. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses to conditional uses such as day schools, auditoriums used for social and sport activities; health centers, convents, preschool facilities, convalescent homes and others of a similar nature shall be considered to be separate uses and shall be subject to the provisions of the use district in which they are located. This condition is not applicable. j . Conversion: ,No existing building or structure shall be converted to a conditional use unless such building or structure complies, or is brought into compliance, with the provisions of this Chapter. This condition is not applicable. k.. Public Improvements: The proposed use and location shall be adequately served by and not impose an undue burden on any public improvements, facilities, utilities and services. Approval of a conditional use permit may be conditional upon the provision and/or guarantee by the applicant of necessary public improvements, facilities, utilities and/or services. The subject proposal is adequately served by public improvements, facilities, utilities, and services and will not require additional services. The Environmental Review Committee imposed the following condition as part of the Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated: "That the applicant provide a storm drainage plan acceptable to the Public Works Department which includes tightlining the roof drains and the installation of an oil/water separator" . 4 . Other agencies (D.O.E. , Fisheries, WSDOT, and METRO) have commented on the application. These comments are included in the file. The Department of Fisheries did note concern that the applicant did not have an erosion control plan required as part of the environmental mitigation. The ERC did not impose such a condition since the Storm Drainage staff did not determine erosion would be an issue. By code, though, the City can require erosion control is conditions warrant such precautions being taken. 5. The project, as mitigated, will not be detrimental to the public, interest. Therefore, the project should be approved. H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the application for Ron Lien, File# ECF; CU; SM-120-89, be approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Compliance with the Environmental conditions imposed by the Environmental Review Committee and listed in the Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated issued in January 17, 1990 for the project. 2 . The applicantdesignate one of the parking stalls as handicap parking, with a dimension of 12 1/2 ' by 20' . PRELIMINARY REPORT TO T HEARING EXAMINER • landscape planner to improve the submitted landscape plan to address the condition of the environmental determination requiring additional landscaping to screen the site from the Cedar River trail located on the east side of the Cedar River. Landscaping for the airport is, restricted due to the need to avoid hazards to airplanes including trees and birds (attracted to the airport due to habitat provided by the landscaping) . i. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses to conditional uses such as day schools, auditoriums used for social and sport activities, health centers, convents, preschool facilities, convalescent homes and others of a similar nature shall be considered to be separate uses and shall be subject to the provisions of the use district in which they are located. This condition is not applicable. j . Conversion: No existing building or structure shall be converted to a . conditional use unless such building or structure complies, or is brought into compliance, with the provisions of this Chapter. This condition is not applicable. k. Public Improvements: The proposed use and location shall be adequately served by and not impose an undue burden on any public improvements, facilities, utilities and services. Approval of a conditional use permit may be conditional upon the provision and/or guarantee by the applicant of necessary public improvements, facilities, utilities and/or services. The subject proposal is adequately served by public improvements, facilities, utilities, and services and will not require additional services. The Environmental Review Committee imposed the following condition as part of the Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated: "That the applicant provide a storm drainage plan acceptable to the Public Works Department which includes tightlining the, roof drains and the installation of an oil/water separator" . 4 . Other agencies (D.O.E. , Fisheries, WSDOT, and METRO) have , commented on the application'. These comments are included in the file. The Department of Fisheries did note concern that the applicant did not have an erosion control plan required as part . of the environmental mitigation. The ERC did not impose such a condition since the Storm Drainage staff did not determine erosion would be an issue. By code, though, the City can require erosion control is conditions ?warrant such precautions being taken. 5. The project, as mitigated, will not be detrimental to. the public interest. Therefore, the project should be approved. H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the application for Ron Lien, File# ECF; CU; SM-120-89, be approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Compliance with the Environmental conditions imposed by the Environmental Review Committee and listed in the Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated issued in January 17, 1990 for the project. 2 . The applicantdesignate one of the parking stalls as handicap parking, with a dimension of 12 1/2 ' by 20' . ___\_. (i5'' ram" PAgK 1 i•-'54A y �)' �ojk. ` tit t--.@ a ts 1 +<`r Q 191-":811‘46-.S -'‘'-'- "OA (fit l �e ex wr ,, . '".6 ��Eo. m �I p- 5 cc lel o CD e-1 ipAi Oa'?E� off, �FZpPD �D' � �������'�l �u�. ------7\ r att-a 41wii. j _ G , • r E ,,'�'�'�� °�. � f r :47. ,�+r�+. ` _ • ICI 4 UNGy ,t--64--P `� y VW vmE ' . '` Ate . .• (Pc)11/01.441k - El 1 -,. . \- ! •ApAht-i- - :. 1 . ' ;. • .416- 0 • 444IP" IC:;i:::) : .` y\l - , . - AIM '7.1 , I--&" 14 t ot 4 a x.., is,.} iJ NEW A5Pt"f"t�--': -.PJ,�1lN(7 . \ dU �k P � SS • sS — G _. _SS a . r • • - , ... SPERMETER143 ' -+ '°" '� xt' t V,1 D.I P CA-5 Z i • • . , . . . , .. . ' • . . 1 . . . . . • • • . . .. , . • .• . . . • . : ..i.•'. ' 1• ii: -.. ,_4_15 Qs:- '3 ./• ' N w po 35T.8, 11''_°V..A;S., ,,,. . U, v...s.•6 7 h 5 1 , 1,..s g 53, •••,-.1 ' N W rt.* • Pl. VAc.._ • \ • .1r). topcoat... . ....‘\\ ...... •. .-s.)..:•1 I to;--1•----II..4:I 716:...6T.i i,^*)'..•.6..2',.—'4,5,-\.1dII,I' ..c-I.i-r--s—.--.-'-'-'i-f---.-.-NU—F..1Mq-3u"ia.-g1. L-....,c ic••••'.••.-•-••;.41'6' ' ...\•....\.,14)-/V II 1N. 'I TPr " IT ' 1111 1 1 = 1 - . }I 4 I I OBN-_•5.1 \ - . i ck.NNk.!....L,,,:...'.1'k6.,r:.•.':.4',.k.-.0.i1•'',- 1I7 lk•1 R.':1I •4 : . ...• .... • \_. \ -- itwaw •i • _. . . ___ .- ' •CD, • 1 ' I - • •_.::._-;_- '(,,,""' R- . •-.----f i. ....1 . ;,' . 11 • •'... ....1 .;•..-..:, . 4‘,L.:.-L_L _L. . , ,.../ . .. , : • .., ‘. - . •. . . I . _atill.1 \ - fri • ' 5 EN/c5.¢ JuNtoR-. _ ., : 7 ' ' 23 ' — \ I I'S --•-• I] 1.--"I ,\• . ; - . 1 kj iG W.. ruG1-1 ' 51o, ., • I) . .. .5,-NO0 L. SC.H001- ,._1.,,j1._.=.•,• - 2•4-P• 2 -.-767)-7--", ----___ '''5, . --..- - , .44 f--,7,-.717._ , .... . , til. :2 •- - ---2' Y r--- .<1.7- • % , ., . .=4-.-f' . • ---• )4.r sy,2.--e-,,,,, •. _ , i ... Li ----- , • ....i • 4- .7. 1 t . ....,-tt, 3 4 7,70 _,,s",., \, • J EMIR - 1 : • ! __i,a i Sh,.. ., R1.=: - . • - ' 4- .--i-, ' E- ---: t- • ! I-- 1 T kop.-1-. . 1-1 1•114,-,-.r../ , ---. - .... .... ..... , r.fil If 'I i e.. '.2.• 4 ... '0: . L'LL 11,i , app,m,,°-....k•.-la '• •• • 3 14.0 ,-1-. .t I 1 :I II FrIT ‘5.111 .. 514 i. :i -5 a :I.•1 : ipEifi ....,, . i.„ ,. :.: , . . 441 14P - • \ __-- (---"-,.\.. :.r.I::NI , • r::_ ,. 9 3 / . i..11 •7I 441p, 4. ‘..- .'•••''t.• . A- .7.1 . Lij 5 iiiir ' --:::-------.- ' : .. L. A'•• . 1,•• • 1. •••!-!..: ... . , rENFI R-. r . / x % z_ \ - \ •—I : ' -1,i '-'• ---igiujiv,i•.• .-- tui .-., al : :-. , . -- . ,3 - '.,d> 5 " : < P_Ail • . ( ---. „.. --- .., ., -,..„,___, .. . L., L. \ A \ • • ,.,. . . .• zo . 711. [.7 , . .., z ' ... \ o \ c., • • '\ \ 1-. 0\l'' 1 , k 3 . ....... .i. ,-!. • rrr,...i. ro, \ 'ro9 \ • nr1 \ . . --- 1 ,' . • •• ' ....r,17- .5 _ W Ki ;.42". ri i‘• ' 4', lOrr — . --(... ••-( .\ -7Z s \ g,C-\. c..0-'\ \\ _ __ \ ‘ 0. —__ , ----c.--. 'IL- _,i (% ..-- Ail'. gig . j7-ir jr Elz 1:0 1,, ..y"',a, .. •:1 4-o,..,..,C25-,•/-,-,-, _ ___„--,...,• ... :....-...,1 - • S-'= li- 1 A, ,, .....," / .:7,..... t \ \ \' -.' . ' ,••• gr7i-2..' '' IL 1 " ---11--1 .-H. ._111-‘11 i' L4% A \ \ , . - ••,'_- -- 1. L'1._it-Tgcti.14:t,tieji:___-' .__. i',1,_.,Idini . • • - • . . , • • • . . - Robertson Aviation Corp . . .. . CU, SM,ECF-120-89 . • • • . . .• • . • . APPLICANT PnhprtRnn Alriat-ion Corp TOTAL AREA 22 926 q F , • PRINCIPAL ACCESS Perimeter Road East • EXISTING ZONING Public Use • • EXISTING USE Aircraft Hangers and Office I • . • PROPOSED USE Aircraft Hangers and Office . . . . . • .COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN • . .COMMENTS Located at 289 Perimeter Road East . . . . . • . . . . . • . • . • . ' • . 1 I r . 1 . I • I . • • • . • \\ • LAND• USE ELEMENT .'. - ... , . .1 ..t.' - . . t . g I • gm MMMMM mi ,. Single Family 1•••••••1 Commercial ., . . • -...... ..........., ........Office / Office Park 76 .:.:...:.:.,.......... Low Density , .•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:. ' ''' ' 41P 0111 e f r.ddillb. ..., ...................... Multi-Family . , • .....A •:•:•:•:-:.:•:•:•:•:..., i' 4111111P 0 11111 : i ;• , •-,,... 4:glop:Lill "•-••••••" • )0000000 Medium. Density 00.0000c _ .i. ....:...:.... -r.r.- 4rz---. :•:•:•:.:. - D.0.000000000.0c Public/Quasi-Public - , ..:•:-.....-::: MEIN •IIIIMMENI •:•:•:•:•: I •::::::::::::::::::::::" 1•111M1 MIIIIIIIIM •::::::::: ............... D0000000 •••••••••••"• ;:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:. Multi Family 0.00..., : liV '' -41 iiiiiiHr•:,::: • - , 461:4., •••••••...:::::::: . f t. ,/ • . .•••••.. Na ilaiiiiiiiIiiiiliiiiiii.i High Density . Light Industrial , , , ,. ,1••••1, . .... .1 .7.4 Multi-Family • i , • . ..:7:::•:::::•:-. • • • to <:',•'(;,ii\-':, H:M.t4+i- Recreation •.e..,-,,.. • • • • ' • • • • • • Heavy Industrial . 4 . • I o . - • , < :..-- •-. ..., . A • • .",,,....: ::t 1.1Z',..'...';'. .i. , LI .'/....•..P•. 'Cil.k'. .1.C4.ej Greenbelt A. --------- Manufacturing Park ,. ;5 .., . / Multiple Option 1 ..;.. . ?. ., i Ira.--Ifi i •'-. :f;r-v..;.,::;,„. Revised April 1985 ,( I. .....: ' s li\\ ...tip . "...,...-...i....,ml .0L . • .., 1 11\ .0 • . \, 1 "t • ''::::::isi:i::.• .% '''-iaiiiia • v2.,.-7"1." - en- •• 1;I; ...V ::::: .% . • ::: i '•%.‘ . • \ ' ,‘ :::::::: • fi .•.•.•.•.• % 1'. WASHINGTON „.,-- ,-.,• iiLL,' ; t 4‘ ., .• , _,...• If- - . A.:i•$. imiI i< 1 1% #.4 ",.-..-,:.L.mt; .:.: 111 •• -UJ ''i ,/' '4•".',-;••II).• NM it,,,,, , : [ imp _ 4 • .. ,.• • • • • • • "d'e • • • • • • kr-.,•:11/4,• .:":'• • . ''Z% ..-- • ...0'.& 11117, ' .-- . • • • • • • --• --- .. •...,' • • • • • •NMI kith / \k;... -":";• - IP ''' • • • • • • • • • 41 ..:::: : ..... . - 'o 1 . 'o s ..... . v'O°.:0., • • • • • • • • • • \• • A,•„•• t i .:20. ME& ..-00•0., . •••••• • • • • • • • • ii).• • , .............,., •••••••• -: ,,, 000000° mi.. •.." •r 1106*--• rimi,..1. .-• 4 NER",;, :ogogqgg. . ••••••••••••••••••a•a• \•a•a• ::, s i.;.:•:..:•:•1: ..,;g4:111111.1.mint ggggggge . • • • • • •• • • • • • •\ • • • • ;- ' :: ::: 'geeallill. 1 :°g°g°g°g°.•4• • • • • •• aa • • • ••;•• ••',:' : :i'::':•i :C. ..•000000000.0, t•-• Roil ...•90! IIII. .1 ?000000c,00 _ • • • • • •••••••i••••• ••••• ,;:,,, .,„,. viiii"...,,„1::::4,14 1 . . .0g0g020g0,, 1.1 pt e)poi N p., • 11111.1 ..i4;:,,atg.gogm: "...„;,..• ••••••• • • • : :a. 70 ,,:m., Shell%• •:•711.1,11..,,,;...,1 ••0• I 10111N:i.!.I.r... 0 • ;0°• . :gg.2•!: 196 ... • •:...,;N:l000gogoggc,' St. ........ •••••••••• ••• • • • 0000 .1•:gggggOgO• ••••••• ,..!---;-7-.7 •- s. .•.•.• luo.gogg gg: .t • • • • / ..: 150 41 :;0.8-:iiiiglimmum- r.".1.1,41\:,:gogggigog v...•.••I 00 ..4.;..41.: :ggdepgg: • • • • ..,. , J : • -.4': • • •••• , • • •• • ,..53 • • • • • . • 0\ .... . -,, • • • • • ib • ;•,;•,, . ri•::,•:77.;:;..777:11 e• .• 6. : : V • ., III12h j.- :113.11•4°M04' ::*•::::: ::1110 • • • • . ,I * ' •'' ..,1.11,11iMpl 0. 1 0 - Ila?2,ggg2oggOolt • • • •,:Aii;iiiiiniiiiiiiiiliilina • • • O' 7ph. i ,,r• 1:114:. 4 0 r.._Ai '''.. OW:;g0g0g0g0g.0 • • i2E:•0::: ::?;gam VA*. •,-*i.• - voilmoot • 0• 1 ..,II...,:00floop0000: • • • pr--=--lral • to.' •• lip••••1111M1111\1 - 'jlellEr --I.- °•,,•''MM.•.0.5202ogog.• . \ IIIIIill.4°Pg6g°°0• '1'0.0'0'.i SIM • • • • 1 k ::11 'n'iggig : 14°Mg7 fr.-P-''''-----goilit-' -. •• Ai • -., ! 's * __ ill:0 ?,000g0g0g00 0200 mi,• ,, ,.,0,0,.,,0„0,,•,a •-0• ,:], ,li,.- gam•- ,..,,,*•• 1. L.., •A„, Q., . < 1.1 .., gri o 0 0 OII30°•?::g,;1/4.• •00,1 INC •, 1. ,_. .00•. ,„:„., .. offifif - ,u ST ' •'... a, gi° \. l'' . '' ' I lb IL '1:: ::: •oo • ... ... ,. . *o•o* 0°0 I . °0411412 RI . 'iMilir 4 li c•,.."•••••-:; tool ind-1111 •••41111 UIra 41.•••dhl .14•2•• 441111111111111IMMII .,,,,,,,,44444 0 ,..,,.. nwinguntli y 1111P2fr. Vibe. 4‘txuaigi ''''•"'-''---', -r :-------. -•••• icit,lig•i, 441',:kaumpj. - s Ib' Aml i .:•,<,: -,,.“,',.. "1"1146' .. ,.... .dc4hilit•Notr_...2.-_4•60,;(36o0* 1 111M11111111.44 AIM;•• ,:.(-• um • 1.,:••••.6,0:`(5,::13114444 Emma • • o 0 c• 0 ummt„ %gm,. -.! :,.., /• •N 'f 1-4,•111111r yed rani•020g0g0g0g0g, Ntlimmamr._,,,.4.• ..t,:::12.- .• Fkb.. - :•-; i...1111111111iit 4c..::ej...,/ i•••:.', "c,g,- •, - 0(07,"\.-0. •• •,;$ 1828......L .,...g..:22::::::; • • ').1,,,,,09.1,1,( ...:.:......22::1„,,,, , . ft ,,,,, ,,,. ,,,.,,,, ,,,,,.......... 0 c, 0 00 .,.,.........,0:. ., •_...,.. . .s.,_.......„ „ , ..... .,„ • • .,.. .:,,,,,:,,,,,::::::::.:.. • .„• i. -. s , MMM ........................imommollll• 00'"..' -.30139.1 •--•• •. MMM MMINIVNII.M.M:::.:::1:1111::::pc2:Y°' ,,,...• . .111111•k_i \ • .,•:' . ..niiIIII:::III:IiIII:Iii::::::•:•.......''` *...°4q.,i9-,(.7.).,,*(r.,.,•,, IIIIIMINI IIMMIIIIIIMIIIII .. ••••• • •••... 'a \\ •0 *.1', :,:: :i':`i'i':':':':':::`:::::g::: :Ui,:*:;::::)',3..1 ';'ln. 0,,:,,N4& 44•, 3 IIMIIMI MIIIIIIIIMMI.der . „••••• *--.81111111• i \ -, ..MNINI:::IiIiIiIiiIiIiIiI:::::.:•:. :•:•::" 4 1„•.,4"'V' :i...•e•q:;:•L%‘t I' ,1 MMMMMMM 11111•11.11•1111.iiiit 0'4'. 6"::.,;p .•, ...,A; .,...„. , i.comoomor.vg.x•;o•owl .wommasser '' - ::::::::::::::::::::::ffii:'.*•••(3.,Q` %V c''..iii''"- ,0:c.,,,,.:t.):•,N -,00:um .111n11111M11 i.•;.••••,:,..;.. ••,:lsg;.•,:iy..:;:•,-•?:,r,.. • .. . ;;S•Enii: 4.:Q.`" * -----========-=.-"2'1'..:::::44)** • Ill MI .0..11.1!!!!!!!!.-ra!!!!InEr ::.:(;•,••••,. •••:Sr...,4'pr."?,,(:,,t. ..., , e• , -C r-1, -•::•:•:•:::::•.1.T.- •iiiii:-: -\ -J-.',,•'•7. ‘,s'....VNPI ••, ::MM:: 1 . •;.:)Y-i _-=-===.=-=2::-:-=-T_-=-=:-_ ''''4 ::::i3::-•:•:•:::....-J:•:::::::::::77.51,0.. ANNommemal MMMMM gigir.--,AlitiLli ";:.'rg':).e:!',`, ..,::•(.-:6,4 .....„..... ,• 7•. - •....,,Z.'3,••••,-_-_---- •‘• •••••:•:••:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•I•I.:•:•:•:::::::••AWIIME111111M IN r, ,:::::::::(:•:::::::::::::3.*:c'x'4, ----. '':Wii::::, -• .1,.!,:,?. .;.-.: ...1-5.:,:•••:-..:..,s; ------------ v„ ":•:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::•;ommoommorimar:::g:::::•%-i“:•:•:•:•:•::.: N p;: ------.._-..,N 19-.-:- Di..-:-',.--,.° -.6.,••• .Z.,••:•.:. •••• ' ''.:•:•:•••••••••••••iNNIMMIIIMIAIIIIIIMIIINWINI,,•,:*:::::•":'›v AV ..*62:`•.!..:4•.14 "------------- '-''.3.'•;-;2'••-':':--•;?' ''.1.:. : .-::• . --lar-RPTC - ::--- \...- -........-- -r:- . 1 ••••••:':•::::::::i:1 inigningsig,•iMigNi:Iiiigig '......•;.j...E --7-------- ... iv.........;*eitit.:1:::::::::::::::::::::;:: ..... Ar. LI I;$I:::&::::*:INIIIIIMIII;IIIIII 41 AM' 11 •i•I iIIIIIII:ig*I*I:I:I:':IMII:04,... • •IIN ...i ,:i'',•,7'.'' •• "Iv / _....1_ --_-_=_--;- i -, -=-=------0-tfte---------1---------- ( ... rAiimi•::::::::::;:.:IMI:::II:I:IIn:::44111! M11•11111•11;r7Volif.1011iiii•- ww-iii.* i IIII••,o00000.• ..t.. 0.00o0o. ... :Ism .0000 ommow,. ,r•(.?"•e-1., t-"-/MCF •°0°0°0°0°0'•s --) - •-i--- -- -' NE..... 'Amos 20g......" 111111111111.0211M1 .• • '•-• 00. /I i2.;:c.::::•••,,;:c 1. _....____ .ononOoonononoXF..t.&.-_-_-_-_-_-_ -_-_-_,--_-_,.-....-_7 ENNUI M M ;020 . • .: IFtt,••_.L.!o o CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-120-89 APPLICATION NO(S): CU;SM-120-89 PROPONENT: Ron Lien PROJECT NAME: Robertson Aviation Corp. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for a conditional use permit and shoreline substantial development permit to allow the construction of a two 'story wood frame office addition to an existing building. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 289 Perimeter Road East LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Community Development Department Current Planning Division The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet). These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). Because mitigation measures have been imposed, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from January 17, 1990. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5:00 p.m., February 1, 1990, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. Responsible Official: ' Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Current Planning Division Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 PUBLICATION DAZE: January 17, 1990 DATE OF DECISION: January 10, 1990 SIGNATURE : ennet . y erg, Communit r men Lyn . Gutt an, Director Pub is orks epartment • DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: Robertson Aviation Corp. PROPONENT: Ron Lien ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-120-89 APPLICATION NUMBER: CU;SM-120-89 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for a conditional use permit and shoreline substantial development permit to allow the construction of a two story wood frame office addition to an existing building. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 289 Perimeter Road East RECOMMENDATIONS: The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non- Signigicance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant periodically water down the site to reduce dust impacts during construction. 2. That the applicant ensure that sufficient measures are taken to confine all construction debris to the project site. 3. That the applicant provide a storm drainage plan acceptable to the Public Works Department which includes tightlining the roof drains and the installation of an oil/water separator. 4. That the applicant provide a landscape plan to be approved by the City's T andscape Planner and Airport Manager which will reduce the visual impact of the use on the nearby trail system. mmdoc 4 FIRE PREVENTION BUI U POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT DIVISION: ,N0Q1/0(p nluiNcio APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ><1 NOT APPROVED --5+E KEUISC O bUIc.,DNG I cJ 11U*,kidi i Rci4I►, .cioR-rsc. L( � sTi - lei,-( 10 1i krim-k pRQ�p ' Pp`�W) Us1 ,V100,_ EI K)e, v cAit — 120 - 87a UL S tutu Pa 1 t u luD ifv f a B t. - 11v C,d-r•-poiz ,P tip f�In3(0 ‘Av FTI-i- 1 kn`►vatOry Sly i zio SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE DATE 1 I62j(7 REV. 6/88 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: L1)1k a lAarc:Pl v-ILI APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I NOT APPROVED Pa="61.-11 o't_- UN-,J 1 -04;,vo c, 7c_i� Love/J PcV ia A kS--- b. rtr,A.(4.ei."-- DATE 11 i 3 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 IMPACT I; ,CT NECESSARY 1.. Earth • a 0 . a 0 a a . a 2 ." Air a . a 3 . Water 0 0 a a 0 a 4 . Plants a 0 - O a 0 5 . Animals . a a 0 6 . Energy & Natural Resources ° 0 . a 0 . . 7 . Environmental Health 0 0 a ° . a 8 . Land & Shoreline Use 0 0 a . 0 9 . Housing a a • a 0 0 10 . Aesthetics , ° a a 0 11. Light & Glare . a . ° l ° a 12 . Recreation ° a 0 a 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° a 0 0 0 14 . Transportation " a ' 0° a a ° . 15 . Public Services ° ' ° 0 O a 16 . Utilities a ° • a COMMENTS : /!, c_r•',/,:!",-.1" (:', 6 ,,,tc. ,.1,e,1,,e.07"-?,./-71:.#• ----1.,e -4, - ,,ir•N .....e,--- - ,-,--- --.-:./. ;,,,,,,fr,/d../,.->*6,..-, fl-. (---•-•11---.Q-.L.1 e.4-9-7..1 --, -9 e--1-1. Wr, e,---A,i,•_,,,,!4,/ :14),‘,4:e-6.1, ,,,,• .„-- /4.:::),--•-s-e- , , i'-c--,i,„,-...,,,,:, ,-_,, ,.....,.,,,,4;,•• ,., ,/,- , _.•_,,_ • 4)),-,) iv/6f, L. 7. (..'",-e•-/,-,---e2--:-7,--4.-,•-r eee..94%,--n-r-e-e-x-i:- --- -e-1-2.1- ta.4-e- 0 t 1 1 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified àréas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal„....-2 7. / . / Signature of Dire o or uthorized Representative DZ-(e-76-- Rev. 6/88 .. . ...... - —...),REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: (1) 4--- 1_-1---, ,,, 2 (.--,- APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED L.=(-/-., c3 - ., _• - . , I - ,./:-• — 2 /,--„--,,,c_)--__ DATE ., /- / r---- - SIGNATURE _OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ,' - REV. 6/88 FIRE PREVENTIOt JREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION. SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : OO .P.M; ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS • NOT APPROVED • i / ( e IJLJ�Ic1.1 Fcc+cS(+Cti (� d� C 1z1� (PQ ( —c f �, D .. �✓� .Vl (hU l� S�cQQ Sl'wL✓ CY\) . Sir 5 lo.� �S Z � o rt'aiZ II � Defv�. t� wv.�.�S 25 6 if L� C 6,14, ,Q�,) 7--4/y nrMi 12 fxr� 5;06" � P-�m c F t5 Ref w ens v im ;�� c,,y �,�����os /(I ro0m iA-`n 6 c • SIG RE 0 DIR'ECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE DATE #1-7/6--2g9 REV. 6/88 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT DIVISION: up , L' " APPROVED � APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED • J _ DATE '5' !/ 7/ 2 J SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 • FIRE PREVENTION REAU ' POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE ' LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: '�Z� E41.4 • APPROVED 'APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED .1 Ga d; /rd -T • :., �j(s hit" r1egiqram.; �vrL iNs;Aun=no,) of- AnJ•rnc1 Y+Wrt.,rni•rS r1 R r �E V•r t c-u.i P E2 IZ' � rtE�r�,.rTs _ SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR ✓ / �DATE — OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVF�� REV. 6/88 l,(i'af D • I1-13 —�ti REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Sor►i wa f-Gr APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED S�1c%U/ � o I) Pg-r ( -zo J •5 a'w, d{-a e r 7)47ritrityoLy, ( i e, C cL1 )3,, 5 ,/J-2.y 10 0110Y1/ j n v eAvq ft -).5/ o of p 101 � �V?C� Glf�Ct n'�FP.✓' > D>'1 IG� 1. T y14 l ci 11 f/"�a l .. C4v'ar AA'avudiit I SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE DATE /��� g REV. 6/88 1• Earth 01'1rHu1' 1MPAr'T NECESSARY 0 2 . ° ° Air ° o ° ° 3 . Water ° 4 . Plants0 ° ° 5 . Animals ° ° ° o ° ° 6 . Energy & Natural Resources ° ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° ° ° ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° ° ° 9 . Housing ° 0 ° 10 . Aesthetics ° ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° ° ° 12 . Recreation ° ° 0 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° ° 14 . Transportation o ° ° 15 . Public Services o i ° ° ° ° 16 . Utilities ° ° ° 2OMMENTS : I c kGC___ N° Vokis/. .C&Akii— UVIT11/4-(A) n&- PO avvA3 le have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas .n which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact o reas where additional information is needed to properly assess this r crop al . 1 ignature o irr� r or AuthorizedII +� Representative Date Rev. 6/88 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: lr� �rel�e.__1 -4((j APP ROVED : APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED ny development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- ances. second means of approved access is required. Fire epartment access roads/lanes shall be paved linimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes No relirninary fire flow calculations show a fire flow of I z.s"-d is quired. __ Z „ hydrants with a Minimum flow of // c— gpm each required. -imary hydra':t is required to be within /so- feet of ,the structure. )condary hydrants are required to be within 3 0o feet o - the ructure. i approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes _ I fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes No _ I fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to construction. Yes No IGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE DATE 7az., , 7j /9�� REV. 6/88 I. LAN[WAB XINOTO LOCATION: 289 us:PfStL'41L5 MSo w mxln+,1amCrt?r•. '• • ZONED: PI16L16 robe PROPOSED USE: amlcsl¢ornw .111111111111111511/ IIII ; ; II OCCUPANCY GROUP: mz I I 1 a SITE AREA:zO^8 sy r �Q W ��I a BUILDING AREA: mod s yz n • 'J SIESMIC ZONE:-. m \,u ADDITIONIya y CONSTRUCTION TYPE: w+ ` 1•:11'1 4T 'T.�' i . ,�. SITE .PARKING: I Q AIRPORT WAY \\ • IraJ22S 20 �9;,,,Ib- \ SgLBEARNG sT�z e�nauear 2I • o III I No ST o • CONSULTANTS I I i I l I • PRIMSTRUCTURALENGINEER- — • SCHOU C.AflRECAr 4501 lalUR FA )ter SEATTE.VA 98115 i- I OWNER SHEET INDEX F II JTMn•a Al meat SHEET/SITE PUN I . �iw,< A2 FIQlt PL2S/Azrmcreo CM,.pull _ I 1 'IB9 DST RFB¢'IIX ROAD AS F]L iIQ6/54TLQ1/iN0•... Arrn0rr,,022m0ltel 98055 A4 CETAIIS I i Sl RYSAItTIC0:elk/sccrIct. I a - IZSO 2W LEVEL @Jnrz/%F IAA 114 O •s / M\SYMBOLS GENERAL NOTES SITE PLAN 1'=20'—om• _ ;i ICy BUILDING SECTION construction t a 'I i 1- Al!con on shall conform co the 1988 Edition f� C SECTION IDENTIFICATION dal SECTION IDENTIFICATION of the uniform Building code. �1m.eq" •s•bga' Z !I I • SHEET LOCATED ON N SHEET LOCATED ON I. All wood in contact with concrete or ma 1•.° I O I 1 be pressure treated wood°rimy species.masonry eouna.cion ��106 �— / ' ELEVATION MARKER grade cedar or redwood• all marked by an approved r�� I WALL SECTION tasting agency. r l - _° i SECTION IDENTIFICATION J. Provide horizontal reblocking in all frame walls s, �••<< W ,v:� SHEET LOCATED ON GRADE ELEVATION stun.-g.on center.and wherfram with penetrate ,90 -�� .2 dtd ,,,We S1 1:5. O ,L ceilings. inaccordanceme itn U.B.C. sc. ,�. .-d+OYry NJ)nidiY - 1, j DETAIL TOP OF WALL I i w. j DETAIL IDENTIFICATION ~ s. .andin•from thespaces,n•11 be divided f into horizontal OVERALL a 1., y s eeingl0oo square feet by p+rciciona B SHEET LOCATED ON Or_ mama true two ceiling Fens roof with the s'e.• .�• L uvn,vul I e dimension not co a to so feat. Partitions • �7>i``It ze+ TOP OF CURB .hen..In'gypsum board or 0/8•plywood. Openings ' INTERIOR ELEVATION 1 in partitions shall be procehed by,die-closing more. '�1etvT-s Gk('w �e ".'tea o �2 —ELEVATION IDENTIFICATION • 5. nuiutng•:dressato be posted on exterior face o- `4 -(1NU ' Z� 'p/ SHEET LOCATED ON s 7 TOP OF PAVEMENT bm:dtno 1n etc and numbers 6•or larger. �'F,7 o�D (" W l 5�� REfra ROOM NAME 6. Provide•door r lending not greater than 1/2- ^ NEW S '•sn 6; 111117111.1M1 ROOM NUMBER below threshold oneach side of all required exits. . /// WWC A.C� vat ROOM MATERIAL CODES —'—— CENTER LIPS t,yoUc.shown for lease, o preliminary only 4.`--' \ lit‘ S P +RA •� N __— E� 7M na Fl N —PROPERTY LINE nd•ro for purposes or assigning addresses. deter- mining / "'r) • U WALL I SCOT— z exit requirements. and locating toilet rood, \ f'Y"r.,ro Elf>nru 3rd no.CEILING Fial layouts m be submitted as tenants are selectee. M o.r CEILING HEIGHT —.—.._CENTER LINE OF STREAM •iero er' � -� ,� I cnuur,. }F e. xoufr Architects Doan Group oe ,ny coon irca° AaomoN \ y �" I - © GRID MARKERS - changes co these drawings. \\� + 1 r _ ° • i71 NEW CONTOUR lNf+TE. M.rT. r./wUsc..pl4.to -e. ::a„rZ \\ .:¢•,r1. exeor NUMBERS ON X-AXIS i s. General Contractor to verify•11 dimensions. • - )CM • � ,�,.) `- O Ad-lS lam....LOOMS_ \ wGw P.6�.Y..� U =__ • LETTERS ON Y-AXIS �75r EXISTING CONTOUR lo. General Contractor responsible for al perm cs. � �� ew,w,o,f,.c "�'QO` t,aa _c• — 1 \_ ��k/'^wi W [( c c DOOR SYMBOL 11 condition Contractor responsible all existing m'(^ --- - t4S 31dJ6 ,- - , O DOOR IDENTIFICATION ' gyp-'�e1 i r;g y zrz6; ,\\ �.�T� ill. Q ^s 2 REVISION CLOUD ems. J' Q • + 'o' 1 ce o r --s1 I—�--. • �WIND0IV SYMBOL I s:—_ce •u' . 3 WINDOV/IDENTIFICATION EPE�METER� -ss-- IDENTIFYING NUMBER MATCH LINE o, .�� SHADED PORTION IS THE LEGAL L` Al 'C�.�,..v.Iz.'Opp cl.ez �',R•.if�. r= SIDE CONSIDERED LEGA. t/ • ,. ...... --. ......ter.-,..,..r....ssu.... y hula/ -.,....m....,m.,.....,..�. -....�. L£4EN D _ _ /*a•or P.. pRo.y[cr 0915 • .wv...u.,...»c+.m.u.. SA ,,.....: `+]'T1 Gtx.T W.1it - It,Si2G- —— L(Q) M+sst..w.p.e ,—..rear DRAWN BY KJK vrN•AWit G'-6' _ —_� CIECxID PT ei efOh.l 1J NrPL4 76.E —�' -�—� • • ......�........w.O...r_• 12 RP..oc rww a• 5 .0 rare .. . Avec a.<Rwc 1.4 CEDAR RIVER • Rlwr..eT.4wME 1'fem 1r1.11 -1 I± JZ . , -R i�1111•• r• r_111111,10111k612::::: t i' q • � � A4 1r11uuh'1 ' ` . z i f l l i 2ND FLOOR REFLECTED CEILING PLAN ''c ;IST FLOOR REFLECTED CEIUtiO PLAN © ? i I 1 I i y-0. 4''to"[.Ye e 'I' �ry 31-0 ZOQ 90-0• \t 20_0" I 4�• . / 7_d 1 g-10 1 4_4' t 4,_2• fl IT t ''310 �2.a� I (o a F • la'.9" le' l0 In eEri'TI�` 4. YI)'I :22 r.Yl. w t� y 1 S 2 ---___ - '� - ` - LJ ' U• /- M . Fr- • M WMiNO ~� 'xI6T1}!G 4•x S` 11 -to -�ILE'�,/.� • �T • VN TW l{i-IffILYAYIa� i-_ tuciotP w r , 0" + lUU N d;� of I N ^ OlFiCE /% OIYIE; ! ) • — i_ }- r Q 1 ± / __ I_ 1Y f p 1 i ti! e, 1 q r FI T Z N ) 1 u LL I _ 0 &' �_ -4 $. 14 . • a o • 4 N n�. IL v �-_--t""_ _ RJ eEW.NUG GWVITWwS � G39,4C . V ;� OFTICE '�f� • ) . i I c..ever - mac. 1 EX1 OPF I Ce L j fie<< , ® o .. pI I- $_ d IT A nr!— ...! 101 LOUFIGE1., sever I r 7' X r k _ HATCH DasT.P,+SLL Ct)tST. + Q `._ten y�_e' v-e } e,2.a VN� _ I. 3'.L" III'1I I'' � 4� i i 1 .2a+Fr� .740, ir \ --'��yrt'rnl. �—t I---+ icy --,__ • „CT "�e I ' } l SFIONElL „.. AINNINNNINININMIli ' p1pJCCf 8^11�) WacH �� ��, 7,, i DRAW iv KJK —� cneexen C7 _ / � cwrc h� • SECOND FLOOR FLOOR PLAN.' LAN FIRST FLOOR FLOQR;P A2 ,..... . • . , .. . . 141tifit:.11 . ...... -• ....iimmia ''. .: .51.11'HEM- ....,r4f.-44 O. ''rKI-CiaLtalTF:.14.41,46 ...„..4,(LoPING A. r,.., ,otrxim4Amz.i...1 e•-•,-rf•Wr-IP • ----- .11/6Truci" sta-r..i,k/rr, • . .,--- . - 4:: - . . - 1) r•''''_.t. , ... ., 7 a a a ..._ .\ [I . 4 1 1. , . 1• .PIWAR.L.1. I 1 i i VA.eace -----"hir c.i...e.PC 4 1 ] f 014•0,0C i',1 *A'1'0f 1' \\\., T.,I/6","" ‘ -"...7-':1______. __11 . 1.1 li I . • .• 1 _ \ ° . •:.>'.:`\\k::. . , J i , \ .. . f . r 1 .4=.C.C. 111.11111111111 liiiMMOMNIW "ill Jattigre41•WraT •• • e) . ..' ,, 1 0 . I • I 6 if4,6,7-{..1 •Rfill. j .\,. . 1,..j. gf0t/ji0Ag;= .." / 1 f1, ( -6 P.,6 Fyi-At . „ :7 IstiW- PR 1z / _ __ . -' • -1-(0 F • I ROOF PLAN SECTIONAA . • 5 • 1/4ce-6" • 5 .1 . ., i, 411.1111.11111111111111.16., /7-76.7 ilex,-e.cfr-et . 1 1=INIMMINI 1, J. ni i 1 0 1111 1 I . • CO . l!(_ w 1 /Li I I LI I . .--J Ill'"Ill 11 ll '(-/i / II I Ij_i___.d I- I 'Pr."' I" r I • ,.._s._ ,_-4,, 1 /1,. 1 r I!,,----I 4xv,.... - 0 II1 ! '! HI 1'1 11 IV - i r • ,I r r Sf.,..4•. >I— il /1 11 1 1 6' i,,--C12.4-1.4eAlr I --a- • ;;i I . i :; cc Ts • ii [ / 11;1 . HI 1.1 i !•ii i .' hi ; i,!; i 1 • _ , , !. , • 11'.:i a (3 ,Id :I 41'11: ' wi e e e ,e1Ele - ee,® , lq., e e •! ;Hi s. Fr .--.111 Ill ,H., !!' FF s , pili!ili iiII, ii.• i 1 / II, .,,,1 i.: >. . I: :!:11; . ii ,„ . . .1 . • . ' '11 it!1;1111 WI! '1 i III m /1,.; :1 _...ii.I : •. / WI!.1 ii '1 .1! I. / • .. • ,: -1-- ,,/ El. / Illh I I I ll • - /1 i l,11,:.-71 1.,•11 ! AMY/IININOW., . : II/ II !'iipT1 / 1 , e • /1. II I'll HT-.117-il 1 I . . . i ii. l.. • . . Alli 11;1111HiiHi1:111, 1 , 1 , 101.0.1CCT 8.115, I 111.1111111- / I 111 ‘ .----0.0 err .o o e e. e • 8- . [An ‘, gi.,:l.,f-A0tZT .:,,,,,. • . • . . t4QtrilijaceYATION AIME . . WEST ELEVATION • • • • se • . / x • rr` • as l RAY TERRY • r Nog REVISIONS • ,4111; fog ARCHITECTS ROBERTSON AVIATION P.O. ET ME BOX=eo SITE PLAN T-J • LAKEWOOD,WA 55259 • t$ CITY OF RENTON A44... COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division March 1, 1990 Ron Lien 289 Perimeter Road East Renton, WA 98055 RE: ROBERTSON AVIATION File #ECF;CU;SM-120-89 Dear Mr. Lien: A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for Tuesday, March 13, 1990. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public :leafing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have ny questions, please call 235-2550. �ncerely4,) , ( l4 f Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:mr cc: John, Terry and Julie Lien 289 Perimeter Road East Renton, WA 98055 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION_ 510 6 7 Lynn Rainey ,being first duly sworn on oath states • that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS __ • • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition C; Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ,., monthsprior to the date ofpublication referred to, printed and published RENTONN HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON ' ' in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King A Public Hearing will be held by the County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal Rento nthenCouncili er atam hiss reon the newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Second Floor of City Hall, Renton, wash- King County. ington, on March 13, 1990 at 9:00 A.M. to consider the following petitions. ' ROBERTSON AVIATI•N - The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition eF;GU SM-jf 0-89 ... , Renton Edition XX , Auburn Edition , (and not in pplication for a conditional use permit supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers amndit shorelineto th substantial development allow e construction of a two o - during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Public No t i c Q wood frame office addition to an existstingry_., , building. The property is located at 289 Perimeter Road East. (Hearing). R401 Legal descriptions of the files noted.,: above are on file in the Renton Community was published on „i a r c h 2, 199(l Development Department. • All:interested persons to said petitions,,, ' are invited to be present at the Public Hear-- ing on March 13, 1990 at 9:00 A.M. to?, The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the express their opinions. - - 19 .9 5 Published in the Valley Daily News on' sum of$ March 2, 1990. R4017 X>pst)i)U6-)y 'Vl Subscribed and sworn before me this 2 n d day of March 19 9 0 otary Public for the State of Washington residing at Auburn, King County, Washington VDN#87 Revised 4/89 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING.EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON. A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON March 13, 1990 AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: ROBERTSON AVIATION ECF;CU;SM-120-89 Application for a conditional use permit and shoreline substantial development permit to allow the construction of a two story wood frame office addition to an existing building. The property is located at 289 Perimeter Road East. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Community Development Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON MARCH 13, 1990 AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. Published: March 2, 1990 • Account #51067 OF RED 1 O �� Z INCITICE C''?4 SEP-C"' City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a PUBLie HEARING in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL ON MARCH 13, 1990 BEGINNING AT 9"00 A.M. P.M. CONCERNING: ROBERTSON AVIATION ECF;CU;SM-120-89 Application for a conditional use permit and shoreline substantial development permit to allow the construction of a two story wood frame office addition to an existing building. LAKE WASHINGTON • • • 03 ' I a i 7 ' O N y w " 4TH S Z 7 1 Q . SITE.. AIRPORT WAY • '• Z;' C7 2ND ST • 3RD ST GENERAL LOCATIO AND/OR ADDRESS: Property located at 289 Perimeter Road East. • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING&ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED .WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATION I , arr �aveJa , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 3 COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN 3 CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON 3-a -90 ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington 'residing in , on the (4,0P ,SIGNED : �/la�Ge 44, day of yL (4 iq OF RED - `y ® z NciTicE o 09A 09�TE0 SEP ". City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a PUBLI .0 HEARING in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL ON MARcx 13, 1990 BEGINNING AT 9 00 A.M. P.M. CONCERNING: ROBERTSON AVIATION ECF;CU;SM-120-89 Application for a conditional use permit and shoreline substantial development permit to allow the construction of a two.story wood frame office addition to an existing building. -- LAKE WASHINGTON a t 7 • CC CC Q. v • w . '1 • �( ' 4TH S Q . � a . ..� SITE AIRPORT WAY • Z • • . . • . 2ND ST 3 3RD ST GENERAL LOCATION 'AND/OR ADDRESS: Property located at 289 Perimeter Road East. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION 51067 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION T.yn n na-i ne y ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published Environmental Review Committee in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King Renton, Washington County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Significance-Mitigated for the following pro- King County. ject(s)under the authority of Renton Munic- ipal Code. The following Applicant(s) have rf completed a mitigation process: The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition ROBERTSON AVIATION , Renton Edition x x , Auburn Edition , (and not in ECF;CU;SM-120-89 supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers Application for a conditional user permit PP g y and shoreline substantial development per- during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Pub l i r Not i re mit to allow the construction of a tw story wood frame office addition to an existing (Environmental Determination) R3965 building. The property is located at 289 Perimeter Road East. Further information regarding this action published on Feb . 9 , 19 9 0 is available in the Community Development was p Department, Current Planning Division, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. This Determination is FINAL. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the There is a 14 day appeal period which will Sum of$ 20 .60 end at 5:00 PM on February 23, 1990. Any appeal of this decision may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Build- ing, 200 Mill Avenue Sowth, Renton,Wash- ington. An appeal must state clearly, in writing, why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. f Published in the Valley Daily News Feb- Subscribed and sworn before me this 9th day of F e b _ 19 9 fl ruary 9, 1990 R3965 Nota Public for the State of Washington residing at Auburn, King County, Washington VDN 487 Revised 4/89 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DE TERMINATION Environmental Review Committee Renton,Washington The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated for the following project(s) under_ the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The following Applicant(s) have completed a mitigation process: ROBERTSON AVIATION ECF;CU;SM-120-89 Application for a conditional use permit and shoreline substantial development permit to allow the construction of a two story wood frame office addition to an existing building. The property is located at 289 Perimeter Road East. Further information regarding this action is available in the Community Development Department, Current Planning Division, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235- 2550. This Determination is FINAL. There is a 14 day appeal period which will end at 5:00 PM on February.23, 1990. Any appeal of this decision may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington. An appeal must state clearly, in writing, why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. Published: February 9, 1990 Account #51067 N oT E ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF;CU;Sri-12O-89 PROPOSED ACTION ROBERTSON AVIATION Application for a conditional use permit and shoreline substantial development permit_to allow the construction of a two story wood frame office addition to an existing building. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS The property is located at 289 Perimeter Road East POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE [E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION ❑DOES XDOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ❑WILL WILL NOT BE REQUIRED, THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., FPhruary 23 1990 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION } CERTIFICATION I , 6exiti F , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT r4NEt (3) COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN1714 ( 3 ) CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED_ PROPERTY ON pep20p 101410 ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington ` O residing in �eaUT a1 , on the 'aIt SIGNED : r day of }-&T )oq# LA_ () NOTICE ENVIRONM ENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF; CU; SM-120-89 PROPOSED ACTION ROBERTSON AVIATION Application for a conditional use permit and shoreline substantial development permit:to allow the. :construction of a two story wood frame. office addition to an existing building . GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS The property is located at 289 Perimeter Road East POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE [ E.R.C. ] HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION CJDOES YiDOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ❑WILL X1WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY • AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE • DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., February 2'. 1990 • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 2 3 5-2 5 5 0. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION �• STATE O� . 4 JOSEPH R. BLUM ssr= Director �y�1889 0�y STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES 115 General Administration Building • Olympia, Washington 98504 • (206) 753-6600 • (SCAN) 234-6600 February 2, 1990 PLl�ftI��I���'dIVISI0�9 CITY OF RENTON FEB 5 1990 Environmental Review Committee RECEIVED c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Current Planning Division Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 SUBJECT: Determination of Non-Significance (Mitigated ) , ECF-120-89 - Cedar River, Tributary to Lake Washington, King County, WDF SEPA Log No . 10356, WRIA 08 . 0299 Dear Mr . Erickson: The Washington Department of Fisheries (WDF) has reviewed the above proposal and has the following comments . It was somewhat disconcerting to read that no erosion control measures were proposed . Experience indicates that all construction projects, particularly those occurring during the rainy season, result in erosion of some sort, including silted runoff . Proximity of the Cedar River, an important salmon producer, to a project without erosion control measures is a concern. Discharge of sedimented construction runoff to the Cedar River, either directly or through existing stormwater systems should not be allowed . Thank you for this opportunity to comment . If you have any questions regarding these comments please contact me at ( 206 ) 545-6582 . Sincerely, Gayle Kreitman Regional Habitat Manager gk cc: WDF - Olympia STr\3 F,STATF • ii€i• • �scr iFt 'NI 18S9 a0 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Mail Stop PV-11 • Olympia, Washington 98504-8711 • (206) 459-6000 January 30, 1990 ®�69 G/ tr y. gf ON FEB Mr. Don Erickson City of Renton Community Development Department #1 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mr. Erickson: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the determination of nonsignificance for the construction of an addition to an existing office building by Robertson Aviation Corporation (ECF-120-89) . We reviewed the environmental checklist and have the following comments. The Washington State Clean Air Act requires the use of all known, available, and reasonable means of controlling air pollution, including dust. Dust generated during construc- tion activities can be controlled by wetting those dust sources such as areas of exposed soils, washing truck wheels before they leave the site, and installing and maintaining gravel construction entrances. Construction vehicle track-out is also a major dust source. Any evidence of track-out can trigger violations and fines from Ecology or the local air agency. If you have any questions, please call Mr. Jay Willenberg of the Northwest Regional Office at (206) 867-7117. Sincerely, Barbara J. Ritchie Environmental Review Section BJR: *METRO Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598 January 30, 1990 PLA1flWAV3 D4p/f Environmental Review Committee nef� �r � c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator FEB City of Renton 1990 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 C Determination of Nonsignificance File No. : ECF-120-89 Ron Lien Dear Environmental Review Committee: Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and anticipates no significant impacts to water quality or to Metro' s wastewater facilities or public transportation services. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Sincerely, Gregory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Planning Division GMB:p1g3390 , 1 _ il_j_J WilWashington State uane Berentson Department of Transportation Secretary of Transportation District 1 15325 S.E. 30th Place Bellevue,Washington 98007-6538 January 24 , 1990 (206)562-4000 TO: Don Erickson PLANNING DIVISION Zoning Administrator CITY OFRENTON Planning Division Community Development Department JAN 2 5von 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Wa. 98055 E k'_v ''" O SR 167 M.P. 27. 54 C.S. 1716 Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated Robertson Aviation Corporation File No. ECF;CU;SM-120-89 /4) FROM: JAMES L. LUTZ, P.E. , Utilities/Developer Services Engineer Washington State Department of Transportation District 1 15325 SE 30th Place, MS 113 Bellevue, WA 98007-6597 Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review this document. The project will construct a second story wood fram office addition to an existing building at 289 Perimeter Road East. Our response is checked below. _XX_ We have reviewed the subject document and have no comments. The project is remote and will have no significant adverse impact on the state highway system. We have already submitted comments on this project. Our comments are included in our letter dated from to . We have no further comments on this project. We have reviewed the subject document and request the applicant provide further information. We have concerns about the following: Please contact Dick Aust of my Developer Services Section at PHONE: 562-4269, SCAN 638-4269 , if you have any questions. DA:da cc: WSDOT State Aid - MS 121 • < CT1•:•... ..• S.T.Y.; .OF::;RENTON;:.:.:;::.:.:.:::;;::..::.;:.:.• ••••••:•••.••:::::•••••••::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::: •••••. .• ••••.. .....NT.;;1?LANN N�:.::bT.V.IS.T ::::::::::::...::::.:;'.:: :.. ::.::._:.::::::::::. ::::::>::<::::::;:»:::>:::;:>:<:>:;:>::::::::::>:.::::::::>: :;:; :..:..:... .AVIT.:;of::::;SERV;YcB::>::BY::>:MA. :: .' :;:::;:.>;;:•>;;':::::::::::::::::.;:•>;;>:;::.;:.on the I7t6 day of Ianu-ar-i , 19 0 , deposited in the mails' of th4 United .States a sealed envelope containing 4et-e•-Ymiria\--tc>r , documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing cDfs rt�--1 Co. • p\etro ZDc (Signature of Sender) Subscribed and sworn 'to me this /'/V day of 19go . ' No ary Public in and for the State of Washington residing at (A- N therein. ., p.:,>.•Y �':>:�>::'> ii;.:.:iic::::: `i:::>2:> ::<:i:r.:?:: : : :i:2 i';ii2' `:iii<i.ii:i: i'i`;:>iciii::::`?i:' ::'iis> i<>:ii:::iii::` >ii:: >><`•i :2`: ii .' • 17- CITY OF RENTON f,4‹:�� *;� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division January 17, 1990 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504 Re: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith are copies of Environmental Determinations and Environmental Checklists for those projects reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee on January 10,1990: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED Robertson Aviation Corporation ECF;CU;SM-120-89 Application for a conditional use permit and shoreline substantial development permit to allow the construction of a two story wood frame office addition to an existing building. Located at 289 Perimeter Road East. The fifteen (15) day comment period for these projects will end on February 1, 1990. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a re-evaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. If you have questions, please call Jeanette Samek-McKague, Project Manager, or me at 235-2550. Sincer 1 , Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:mr cc: Mr. Craig Larson, King County Bldg. & Land Division Mr. Gregory M. Bush, Metro Department of Wildlife Mr. Joe Robels, Department of Fisheries Mr. James Lutz, Department of Transportation 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Facsimile (206) 235-2513 • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-120-89 APPLICATION NO(S): CU;SM-120-89 ' PROPONENT: Ron Lien PROJECT NAME: Robertson Aviation Corp. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for a conditional use permit and shoreline substantial development permit to • allow the construction of a two story wood frame office addition to an existing building. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 289 Perimeter Road East LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Community Development Department , Current Planning Division The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet). These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). Because mitigation measures have been imposed, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from January 17, 1990. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5:00 p.m., February 1, 1990, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Current Planning Division Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 • PUBLICATION DATE: January 17, 1990 DATE OF DECISION: January 10, 1990 SIGNATURE.: ''ennet . l y.erg, Communi •. - - :- .r men Ly . Gutt an, Director Pub is orks J epartment ,411 • DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED �. MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: Robertson Aviation Corp. ` PROPONENT: Ron Lien ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-120-89 APPLICATION NUMBER: CU;SM-120-89 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for a conditional use permit and shoreline substantial development permit to allow the construction of a two story wood frame office addition to an existing building. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 289 Perimeter Road East RECOMMENDATIONS: The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non- Signigicance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the-applicant periodically water down the site to reduce dust impacts during construction. 2. That the applicant ensure that sufficient measures are taken'to confine all construction debris to the project site. '3. That the applicant provide a storm drainage plan acceptable to the Public Works Department which includes tightlining the roof drains and the installation of an oil/water separator. 4. That the applicant provide a landscape plan to be approved by the City's Landscape Planner and Airport Manager which will reduce the visual impact of the use on the ' nearby trail system. mmdde ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION ECF;CU;SM-120-89 APPLICATION NO. PROPOSED ACTION Robertson Aviation Corp. Application for a conditional use permit and shoreline substantial development permit to allow the construction of a two story wood frame office addition to an existing building. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS The property is located at 289 Perimeter Road East. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE [ E.R.C.] HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION ❑DOES %DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT nWILL WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE p7,�ruaTE BFILClyyb COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY e ry , AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 A.M., • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATION I , M nj Sage (L, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 3 COPIES OF •THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN 3 CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON 1 — j7- 90 ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, 'a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington • residing in 4JtJ vj ) ' , on the ,SIGNED : 'MaAi day ofC)CA— - \q°l,O l/ W-4Sel en Q— ( D N OT c E ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION ECF;CU;SM-120-89 APPLICATION NO. PROPOSED ACTION Robertson Aviation Corp. • " Application for a conditional use permit and shoreline substantial development permit to allow the construction of a two story wood frame office addition to an existing building. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS The property is located at 289 Perimeter Road East. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE ( E. R:C. I HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION ❑DOES %DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. cJ AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DWILL ILVILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE rTE BFZLgyyb COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY e uary , AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 2 3 5—2 5 5 0. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE - WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION 510�,7 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Lynn Rainey ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six Significance Mitigated for the following pro- monthsprior to the date ofpublication referred to, printed and published Muni) under the authority of the Renton P Municipal Code. in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King ROBERTSON AVIATION s County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal ECF;Cu;SM-12o as newspaper order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Application for a conditional ut permit by Pe g and shoreline substantial development per- King County. mit to allow the construction of a two story wood frame office addition to an existing building. The property is located at 289 The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition Perimeter Road East. , Renton Edition XX , Auburn Edition , (and not in This decision will be finalized in 15 days. supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers Written comments received after 5:00 p.m., Thursday, February 1, 1990 will not be con- during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Public Notice sidereu.A fourteen(14)days appeal period will commence following the finalization of (Environmental Determination) R3930 DNS-M. The mitigated measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Cur- was published on Jan . 17 , 1990 rent Planning Division of the Community Development Department, Municipal Build- ing Renton, Washington 98055, Phone The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the Public Notice sum of$ 26 .60 235-2550. Published in the Valley Daily Nev ,OW Ay IU 12 ary 17, 1990 R3930 Subscribed and sworn before me this 17 th day of Jan . 19 9 0 ( Z—Ge...— , _ Not Public for the State of Washington residing at Auburn, King County, Washington VDN 487 Revised 4/89 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated for the following .project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. ROBERTSON AVIATION ECF;CU;SM-120-89 Application for a conditional use permit and shoreline substantial development permit to allow the construction of a two story wood frame office addition to an existing building. The property is located at 289 Perimeter Road East. This decision will be finalized in 15 days. Written comments received after 5:00 p.m., Thursday, February 1, 1990 will not be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of DNS-M. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Current Planning Division of the Community Development Department, Municipal Building Renton, Washington 98055,. Phone: 235-2550. Published: January 17, 1990 11 CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor November 6, 1989 {{. Ron Lien Robertson Aviation Corporation 289 Perimeter Road East Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Conditional Use Permit Dear Mr. Lien: The Community Development Department has formally accepted the above referenced application. It has been routed for departmental review and is tentatively scheduled for review by the Technical Advisory Committee on December 1, 1989. If you have any questions regarding the scheduling of this project, please contact Jeanette Samek-McKague of our office at 235-2550. ince /(. Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/ ?. • • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 c.. RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ,, .= :` ' ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET'' ek`y �`�'04,�0'1r , REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: P1 �1V11 �t- . ✓n , DATE CIRCULATED: _November 6, 1989 COMMENTS DUE:_Noventber 17 , #jY EFC - _120_ - _89_ iI. APPLICATION NO (S) : Conditional Use, CU-120-89 and Shoreline, SM-120-89 I • PROPONENT:_Roberson Avivation Corporation NOV 6 1989 . PROJECT TITLE: Robertson Aviation Addition 1; ! , ' ' '' ` BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: _Application for a Conditional Use Permit and Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to allow the construction of a two story wood frame office addition to an existing building consisting of office and aircraft hangar space. LOCATION: 289 Perimeter Road East SITE AREA _0. 7 acre (28 , 986 sq. ft. ) BUILDING AREA (gross) : f IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY • 1. Earth ° o 0 ° ' 2 . Air ° ° 3 . Water ° o ° ° 4 . Plants 0 ° ° ° 5. Animals 0 0 ° o ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° o ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° o ° O 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° o ° ° 9 . Housing ° 10. Aesthetics g- ° o ° . 11. Light & Glare ° o ° ° 12 . Recreation 0 ' o ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation - ° ° ° ° • 14 . Transportation ° o ° ° 15. Public Services ° j ° o ° ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS : i-c)g -LIKE- 4s2u4-4v -6mn,r,a • (--gbdo . Arb►0—fikL. FA�ce bet-Nior.io t.' P tab Vtlz(p,Ls- p_pDc LweS (-501- t_p a „[. .LL besk_, ice- 71- sfog lb2A) SiB,(,e, ps o1Tlo& L k t_1> ZGr 1'ltct,ilaeria 13erkuL--04 X-!hTNU r14 -1,Jt, S`rkr—s V4c.I (, L-oV4 'k p c.+n.pr,.,v. iew c_A,.-ibsc 10t, J"JZc9 kl�!`-�l� �'� xi c�2�'Z� � Z� Z G>7R Sc-it i tot, 0,1p--t ESE kp oPlt!► fl2 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. • oar P Le.„...„..__ . H A3109 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT t DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-120-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-12C-89 and SM-120-89 PROPONENT: Robertson Aviation Corporation PROJECT TITLE: Robertson Aviation Addition BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Ap plication for a Conditional Use Permit and Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to allow the _construction of a two story wood frame office addition to an existing building, consisting of office and aircraft hangar space. NOV 6 1989 LOCATION: 289 Perimeter Road East , ' I TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION • FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG. RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: LYtkip r_116nV1LG APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED f rbb�-t1owSDcl� Uk0t�sCAcPIo c, i ' Cit!� Loc-A P Ve p v Gta� 4z-tVuc.8-. 6. �. 4-611&049. -- DATE t 1 1 3!"001 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE '1 REV. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT `y ! ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET6,9a , REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �e'11 Pl �yo�o.�1y0 �� ®,�® _ _ .rl; rG DATE CIRCULATED: _November 6, 1989 COMMENTS DUE:_November-/ 41 o1989 d t EFC - 120 - 89 APPLICATION NO(S) : Conditional Use, CU-120-89 and Shoreline, SM-120-89 PROPONENT: Roberson Avivation Corporation PROJECT TITLE: Robertson Aviation Addition BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: _Application for a Conditional Use Permit and Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to allow the construction of a two story wood frame office addition to an existing building consisting of office and aircraft hangar space. LOCATION: 289 Perimeter Road East SITE AREA _0 .7 acre (.28, 986 sq. ft. ) BUILDING AREA (gross) : IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° 2 . Air 3 . Water ° 4 . Plants 5 . Animals 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing ° o • 10. Aesthetics ° ° o 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14 . Transportation ° 15. Public Services ° 16. Utilities COMMENTS: C '\M J\ O Qom( , We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. , l i- 11- Signature of Il ector or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 ti II RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT {. DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-120-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-120-89 and SM-120-89 PROPONENT: Robertson Aviation Corporation PROJECT TITLE: Robertson Aviation Addition BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for a Conditional Use Permit and Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to allow the construction of a two story wood frame office addition to an existing building consisting of office and aircraft hangar space. LOCATION: 289 Perimeter Road East TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION • FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE • LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 171Jiw I ) 'ty APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED C\,) ZD€5ICp k) l.l;1� T� U I3 O bD I LU Ik.)6 F"(ZC 11I a ORALL.q c TI' i ICPrW f 1i*t Fokry &. pRoysA ti 1PP` NcAJE Ufo IL C+k. P •mob t — Ciao �a I-r I `C .tConnv roo T1-�i�l� `1-1. &L ({{ass pNomo t) luro 1-t �c�et � I00c40 o pNizi I u6, ;Ai IT I* Dliev icjry Skr k'ZIkd 60 VVy).(" DATE r ) VJ - ! • SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOt OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT `,,.' }.;',`:,'C � .,,';' : �oP °4 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET4Ok. ‘47Mo 4, REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �JLt�O�t ©�'i9 DATE CIRCULATED: November 6, 198 COMMENTS DUE:_November 1T T j�89 EF'C - _120_ - _89_ APPLICATION NO(S) : Conditional Use, CU-120-89 and Shoreline, : SM-120-89 ' f PROPONENT: Roberson Avivation Corporation • PROJECT TITLE: _Robertson Aviation Addition • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: _Application for a Conditional Use Permit and Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to allow the construction of a two story wood frame office addition to an existing building consisting of office and aircraft hangar space. LOCATION: 289 Perimeter Road East • SITE AREA _0. 7 acre (28, 986 sq. ft. ) BUILDING AREA (gross) : • IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° ° ° 2 . Air ° o 0 ° 3 . Water 0 ° ° 4 . Plants ° 5. Animals ° ° O O 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° ° o ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° o ° 8 .• Land & Shoreline Use ° ° ° 9 . Housing ° 10. Aesthetics ° . 11. Light & Glare ° ° 12 . Recreation ° o O ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° o ° o 14 . Transportation ° o ° ° 15. Public Services ° ° 0 16. Utilitief ° COMMENTS: 1 u W IL, j NOV 6 1989 op Lt) ..j We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional inf rmation is needed to properly assess this proposal. ,;;•----;--"' e----- \__, ,0-•,- -e•-•,____. //-d Sig uz-e of Director or Authorized Representative Date / Rev. 6/88 • . %.1 a • ' RENTOD: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-120-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-120-89 and SM-120-89 PROPONENT: Robertson Aviation Corporation PROJECT TITLE: Robertson Aviation Addition BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for a Conditional Use Permit and Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to allow the construction of a two story wood frame office addition to an existing building consisting of office and aircraft hangar space. LOCATION: 289 Perimeter Road East TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: � �, . J( APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE /7/44 9 S SIGNATURE - ISIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 RENS:— COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • , E ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET;,`;''`' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: k$ ` cx.da vir\. DATE CIRCULATED: November 6, 1989 COMMENTS DUE:_November• 17, 1989 f,. ' f. EFC - _120_ - _89_ PLANNl 1G DIVISI®M APPLICATION NO(S) : Conditional Use, CU-120-89 and Shor�llTYrRE1+I120-89 is PROPONENT: Roberson Avivation Corporation NOV 1 61989 PROJECT TITLE: Robertson Aviation Addition l,qCPrkiiPril BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: •_Application for a Conditional Use Permit and Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to allow the construction of a two story wood frame office addition to an existing building consisting of office and aircraft hangar space. • LOCATION: 289 Perimeter Road East ' SITE AREA _0. 7 acre (28 , 986 sq. ft. ) BUILDING AREA (gross) : IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE . • MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY • 1. Earth ° 2 . Air . ° ° • ° is o ° 0 3 . Water ° 0 o • o ° ° 4 . Plants • ° ° ° ° ° ° 5. Animals ° ° • • • ° ° ° 6 . Energy & Natural Resources i 7 . Environmental Health ° ° ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use 0 0 o ° ° • 9 . Housing ° ° o • 10. Aesthetics 0 ° °- ° 0 11. Light & Glare ° ° ° ° ° 12 . Recreation o ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° o ° • ° 14 . Transportation • o ° ° 15. Public Services a ° • o o ° o 16. Utilities { �y ° 0 COMMENTS. f C' -.. ', . r' ) ! a . , ' , - �R 6,f%L C, Z.. ( '- . .i'. .:.i-;,`- t''''r';' �+�"✓ ,,i,,,u ='i:•r') 1_er;- C'=e• Lam-aV A ._,e';' i.-- . .�-�, e'f- 1 J' s w.. �.,�� ✓ �^+��.� , • .=r'� :!' .'i-� ✓ /�(J �C-'�'-i%t L°i��1 4--t.., /�1"%q-4,-f'-,) ..if d ,�.i �p-44.sLfQ 1 C2. i t- /, �?.-b-cs .lam! 41 Fur`'rr a- ' a- f` .° r+ 'ae' We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable, impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal • %'\,-:5_,=*>-:71Z-- z/r, -1‘''' k %7.%----;J'.-. # 1', /,/6-- 62 . Signature of DireCtot, or Authorized Representative D'a e Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-120-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-120-89 and SM-120-89 PROPONENT: Robertson Aviation Corporation PROJECT TITLE: Robertson Aviation Addition BRIEF DESCR IPTION OF PROJECT: Application for a Conditional Use Permit and Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to allow the construction of a two story wood frame office addition to an existing build' consisting of office and aircraft hangar space. ivIMGDIVISION CITY OF RENTON NOV 1 6 7989 LOCATION: 289 Perimeter Road East ECEIIVE TO: � PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 r 2 / RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Ofy {{ i`,i^, ,i I ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: /.'` u FcY "tn w DATE CIRCULATED: _November 6, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: Novembc O , i'+: 'J EFC - _12 0_ - _8 9 APPLICATION NO(S) : Conditional Use, CU-120-89 and Shoreline,� �SM-120-89 .,, 2:' PROPONENT: Roberson Avivation Corporation Di 13 1989 PROJECT TITLE: Robertson Aviation Addition r;`a BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: _Application for a Conditional Use Permi� - d . Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to allow the construction of a two story wood frame office addition to an existing building consisting of office and aircraft hangar space. t LOCATION: 289 Perimeter Road East gok-) ( T 13 1989 SITE AREA _0.7 acre (28 , 986 sq. ft. ) BUILDING AREA . . L,_ (I u. L; ij I (gross) . IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth • ° ° ° ° 2 . Air ° O 0 ° 3 . Water ° ° ° ° 4. Plants ° 5 . Animals ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° "" ° 7 . Environmental Health ° ° ° ° 8 . • Land & Shoreline Use ° o ° ° • 9 . Housing . ' ° • o ° o 10. Aesthetics ° o 0 0 11. Light & Glare ° ° 12 . Recreation ° o ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 14 . Transportation ° (/f- ° ° 15 . Public Services G ° O ° O i 16. Utilities ° ice- ° COMMENTS: U i i We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional info ation is needed to properly assess this proposal. c. ..,___,,,,--,. l,,yam/ _ ) , �/;), 2 /5E7-, Signature of Director or Authord Representative cO, Date / Rev. 6/88 I t N RENTON -COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 9 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Fu��YOF �I�Y 0�RENTak ECF-120-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-120-89 and SM-120 OCTI 1'3 1989 ' '' PROPONENT:• Robertson Aviation Corporatio � ((� (� 0 L 11)�. PROJECT TITLE: Robertson Aviation Addition V l ff' BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for a Conditional Use Permit and Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to allow the construction of a two story wood frame office addition to an existing building consisting of office and aircraft hangar space. LOCATION: 289 Perimeter Road East TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON REVIEWWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: / //'a-7-f/c APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED eV 777/ DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 rt. f; RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TMENT c. '� [' ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET�;;1 4'®o,,• 1. . •�9�4ro'o* REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ' wp u.4i, li ,,,;!;,: . A,,, • 'vas DATE CIRCULATED: November 6, 1989 COMMENTS DUE:_November; 17 , �19S EFC - _120_ - _89_ APPLICATION NO(S) : Conditional Use, CU-120-89 and Shoreline, SM-120-89 PROPONENT: Roberson Avivation Corporation • PROJECT TITLE: Robertson Aviation Addition BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: _Application for a Conditional Use Permit and • Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to allow the construction of a two story wood frame office addition to an existing building consisting of ! office and aircraft hangar space. LOCATION: 289 Perimeter Road East • SITE AREA _0. 7 acre (28 , 986 sq. ft. ) BUILDING AREA (gross) : IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY • 1. Earth ° ° ° 2 . Air ° ° ° ° ° 0 3 . Water ° hC ° ° ° ° ° 4 . Plants ° ° ° o ° ° 5. Animals ° ° ° • ° ° ° • 6. Energy & Natural Resources i i ° ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° • ° ° ° • 9 . Housing ° a 10. Aesthetics 0 ° ° o ° ; 11. Light & Glare ° o ° ° 12 . Recreation ° ° o ° o 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° o ° o • 14 . Transportation ° ° o 1 ° ° 15 . Public Services o • 16. Utilities ° 1 f ° COMMENTS: • S/,,,,' sewn,.- --P.-'ni—� 15 7 ,4!)/0 771/5 ,4^01-eci- ' • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proper al. • y . ' (ic Signature o Director or Authorized Representati Date Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-120-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-120-89 and SM-120-89 PROPONENT: Robertson Aviation Corporation PROJECT TITLE: Robertson Aviation Addition { BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for a Conditional Use Permit and is Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to allow the construction of a two story wood frame office addition to an existing building consisting of office and aircraft hangar space. LOCATION: 289 Perimeter Road East i TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: SC?uoe, - : ( IWj CS?1 APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS y NOT APPROVED kr D- ,a) 5[ -k,,,, C60,0\,,j F(cv c 5(1S C-t Q-- LCz UA O ) . l T'd e I ""' .,v 0( sc_opz — M,Al L) 3\42" 5eu:ev. 5 L', 1 Z (� ,, o / �r�r,y���� Sie o� Si>� � r�� L0 M r 5e >( l'44,"Cf 4 I Dev�2 lop ,,t�9_0Ai 2 S 6 it S LW w 'c,..l hs o-6 CA, e r•1- Avid /I-WV D77/4 0 ,ix raeES - 5'/06- Sewep- pef/r i5 ReeoiiZ a' 1 L5 A fA-cE4-R r0Z S e_,` l'Air07 iATL,1c / f DATE ///6 — '9 SIGN RE 0 • DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ;+: '_,'` ' pti R� �s ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ®�470 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Si'crla4 WpL � �1 798,9 keo DATE CIRCULATED: November 6, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: November. 17 , 1989 EFC - _12 0 - 8 9_ APPLICATION NO(S) : Conditional Use, CU-120-89 and Shoreline, SM-120-89 PROPONENT: Roberson Avivation Corporation PROJECT TITLE: Robertson Aviation Addition BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: _Application for a Conditional Use Permit and Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to allow the construction of a two story wood frame office addition to an existing building consisting of office and aircraft hangar space. LOCATION: 289 Perimeter Road East SITE AREA _0. 7 acre (28 , 986 sq. ft. ) BUILDING AREA (gross) : IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 0 2 . Air ° 0 0 o ° o 3 . Water x 4 . Plants o O 5. Animals ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° o ° 0 7 . Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing ° a ° 10. Aesthetics 0 ° 11. Light & Glare 0o o ° 12 . Recreation ° ° o ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 0 14 . Transportation ° ° ° 15. Public Services ° I ° o 0 16 . Utilities 0 � ° • ° COMMENTS: Show evls1-l)y 5 -O(cam dy'GIIna -e 57S } ovl 4vi 'T.)5 -1 rn G� I r0t9 dr611m 6 '112 Corf-al bosrtcl_G q vlel I e4 c. ,te e P 14n s,.. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal . k -}16eat-AA-, (4 I /eel iv/6/ ?? Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Dat Rev. 6/88 RENTO1N ..OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-120-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-120-89 and SM-120-89 PROPONENT: Robertson Aviation Corporation PROJECT TITLE: Robertson Aviation Addition BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for a Conditional Use Permit and Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to allow the construction of a two story wood frame office addition to an existing building consisting of office and aircraft hangar space. LOCATION: 289 Perimeter Road East TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION • PLANNING DIVISION • SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 5hr"i waf-Gr ' APPROVED X APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Sow oil pti+(ter 51-o✓w) atita,'►-tly Afouf/- , l �', e �J of 1 v1 ,¢e_/ I o U�,f1Oy)/ ri yr )n v ir+ eACvR—10K) cr v1 Ci f)f 11� 6 ►m i/ d land Cor' ) 0 b'1 �I A v1: 71 J°7/1-1. I /v►-e A 11 q D a dvt-tH1 I I/I 1 CickGi1 bas Y)(5) • Ivo/8-1 DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT '`' +' '';.` ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET:' c ° °tiffs, 041 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: lier u-1 I j e.% :/, ,;. 42 n j v��V, ` 4989 DATE CIRCULATED: November 6, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: November IkV •89 • EFC - _12 0_ - _8 9_ APPLICATION NO(S) : Conditional Use, CU-120-89 and Shoreline, SM-120-89 PROPONENT: Roberson Avivation Corporation PROJECT TITLE: Robertson Aviation Addition BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: _Application for a Conditional Use Permit and Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to allow the construction of a two story wood frame office addition to an existing building consisting of office and aircraft hangar space. LOCATION: 289 Perimeter Road East SITE AREA _0. 7 acre (28 , 986 sq. ft. ) BUILDING AREA (gross) : IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° ° o 0 ° 2 . Air 0 0 . o 0 ° 3 . Water 0 ° 0 ° ° ° 4 . Plants 0 ° 0 O ° 0 5. Animals • 0 0 0 O O ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° ° ° 7 . Environmental Health , o ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° ° 0 o ° O 9 . Housing ° ° o 10. Aesthetics 0 ° o ° 0 11. Light & Glare ° ° ° ° ° ° 12 . Recreation 0 0 ° O O p 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° O ° ° 14 . Transportation ° o ° o ° ° 15. Public Services ° ° 0 16. Utilities 0 1 ° 1 COMMENTS : cut3Mii- WATEn. .rdupTJ (-on- •INSTP-u.N1-16W 0- An Yfio►.ml, wtonn•ws A3 tftu.in.elo rbY 9.6 CG4 fiu ? U%-4-6' *) 7i EOS I cel \Z We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. )tlafitk I1- 13- ?? Signature of Director or Authorized Represen ative Date Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET t. ECF-120-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-120-89 and SM-120-89 PROPONENT: Robertson Aviation Corporation PROJECT TITLE: Robertson Aviation Addition BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for a Conditional Use Permit and is Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to allow the construction of a two story wood frame office addition to an existing building consisting of office and aircraft hangar space. • LOCATION: 289 Perimeter Road East TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE • PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ),Z-114-47 • APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED -�X'�lilwGcJ(�ZZ' 5450. • 4 * S U bvi I r w Iat'Q4 m.) Vu1 I N A tth9 or.) of- AO itn N,ry k orcin T5 R E2 'ARE DEPT. RC-QuiTZEmeoTS _ tia D ` DATE II- 13-d7 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED RE ESENTATIVF4 //-/3 REV. 6/88 u , � 11-)3-3ti I/ j RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPtixrMENT ,,r ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 6(9 .sr* REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 4'o 4.1( ''At , DATE CIRCULATED: _November 6, 1989 COMMENTS DUE:_NoveinbeP44&Q 1989 J EFC - 120 - 89 v i' APPLICATION NO(S) : Conditional Use, CU-120-89 and Shoreline, SM-120-89 PROPONENT: Roberson Avivation Corporation PROJECT TITLE: Robertson Aviation Addition BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: _Application for a Conditional Use Permit and Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to allow the construction of a two story wood frame office addition to an existing building consisting of i'. office and aircraft hangar space. , LOCATION: 289 Perimeter Road East SITE AREA _0. 7 acre (28 , 986 sq. ft. ) BUILDING AREA (gross) : IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° E Air ° o ° I Plants ° ° 5. Animals ° a 6. Energy & Natural Resources 0 7 . Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing ° ' 10. Aesthetics ° 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14 . Transportation ° ° ° 15. Public Services ° ' ° 16. Utilities ° ° COMMENTS: Imo 1 No wA.P a.t ° - putt, avvAl We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this prop al. I i 111 h 1 Signature o ire r or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 RENTON LOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-120-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-120-89 and SM-120-89 PROPONENT: .Robertson Aviation Corporation PROJECT TITLE: Robertson Aviation Addition BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for Conditional Use Permit and Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to allow the construction of a two story wood frame office addition to an existing building consisting of office and aircraft hangar space. LOCATION: 289 Perimeter Road East TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT . BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: V/ APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE 0 II-0 SIGNATURE OF DI TOR 0 THORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 .. ••. IRS, ;,:�'i'yL.r - RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT "•.' ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET`• ', o,. ,a ,) REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: -1-,re- R-•e-S4e,yl-lrn 4" o` • vo DATE CIRCULATED: _November 6, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: November 174s 89 '" Lev j d, J Ja EFC - _120_ - _89_ �• APPLICATION NO(S) : Conditional Use, CU-120-89 and Shoreline, SM-120-89 PROPONENT: Roberson Avivation Corporation PROJECT TITLE: Robertson Aviation Addition BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: _Application for a Conditional Use Permit and • Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to allow the construction of a two • story wood frame office addition to an existing building consisting of office and aircraft hangar space. 1 LOCATION: 289 Perimeter Road East SITE AREA _0. 7 acre (28 , 986 sq. ft. ) BUILDING AREA (gross) : IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° o 0 ° 2 . Air 0 ° ° 3 . Water 0 ° o o 0 4 . Plants ° o ° 5. Animals 0 o o O ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° ° o ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° o ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° o O 9 . Housing ° o 10. Aesthetics ° . ° 11. Light & Glare ° o ° ° 12 . Recreation 0 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° ° o ° ° 14 . Transportation ° o , 0 0 15. Public Services ° ° ° 16. Utilities ° ° • 0 COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal . --;-�^ li1 • 7/ /9/9 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative D e Rev. 6/88 j RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT i. DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET . ECF-120-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-120-89 and SM-120-89 PROPONENT: Robertson Aviation Corporation PROJECT TITLE: Robertson Aviation Addition BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for a Conditional Use Permit and Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to allow the construction of a two story wood frame office addition to an existing building consisting of office and aircraft hangar space. LOCATION: 289 Perimeter Road East TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION i TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: l(e.- PieU4_4 APPROVED __• APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- nances. i A second means of approved access is required. Fire apartment access roads/lanes shall be paved minimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes No Preliminary fire flow calculations show a fire flow of Z 2Sd is required. ____I.,_____hydrants with a minimum flow of // cti-cs gpm each is required. Primary hydra•,t is required to be within _ /.5-a feet of,the structure. Secondary hydrants are required to be within 3 06 feet o the structure. An approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the-total structure. Yes _,-- All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes No _ All fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to construction. Yes No ,(-A,lec- c-t•-----____ DATE 7Oz, . 7/ /749 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 y �4it, yr:ci! ,s°�}1 RE U I RIO FIRE FLOC! CnLCuL AT I ON; 1. HAZARD IDENTIFICAT1 INFO TION • ' NAME pC/.f,Q //J///�► �A} a LF /1/?4."/' U.T.C. CLASS OF BUILD 63 I ADDRESS en �-IC/d t FIRE MGMT AREA i 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (Cl I - iI `- ` IV III V i FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE DJj AR1 WOOD FRAME ' MIXED (NOTE: IF "MIXED", SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW) 9 3. DETERMINE AREA: GROUND FLOOR AREA: FT2 (A' + NUMBER OF STORIES: 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE 01, USING AREA TOTALA BUILDING AREA: l /� � i C ): O GPM (B 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: 7 1 '42 GPM (C IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B): IF HIGH HAZARD, ADD UP TO 25% OF (B). : 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C): (IF B+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) " �,� ..- GPM (D 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT! • /!66•'# CIF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF (D): IF LIGHT D OCCUPANCY M (E HAZARD AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF CD). 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT: • USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMEINT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAN. ADJUSTMENT • EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 0 - 10 25% MAX. 11 - 30 20% MAX. NORTH /�U it ADDO $ 31 - 60 15% MAX. EAST �_ ADD © % SOUTH ADD 61 -100 /;5. % 10% MAX. • WEST ADD C) % 101 -150 5% MAX. TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT • 150 OR 4-HR WALL 0% MAX. (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) (TOTAL $ ADJUSTMENT TIMES (D) �j $ ADJIJ'TMENT: 04e, / GPM (F. , 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: • (IF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT; • �1 GSM (G; 10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: n O 3/, g 5 OF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) .c} • (IF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,O33 GPM) A (D+E-LF+G) REQU RED FIRE FLOW: 6 V GPM CH: • / / ,11. SIGNED: \� .. I ATE / 114` `mz"' y 3$+lGS+,+k e c^.7J7.+#';:*B t4Cns.aicrfa jwq S!.$:us;.^:F ....... .. ow :{::,.' �5.::::��i:�:::?C:'i:i:f�i:;i%�:'::;;C:{;'.::':�'}{::�'is�:�:(::�i:�i:i�:�:i�i:C�:�......."-:{::> ::'} i ;;:::ji: :}':i':}:::::::):�:i'::::i:�:,y;:;:i:{:;?r:: , :: :: .: .'.....'. : : ::: :::..::.......'�OM(1VItJN 'Ty::bE V]E:C;OP E1�TTbEPA](2�'NYlrT�7>>:: ;:>::>:: :: :::»>:< :: . . : .::,�::::..:.>:::: :: ;::. :.:.:.;:.f.. A TE S R APPLI T :::»::»:;;: ::::> >:>:; ::> ::>»::<:>::;>�>>;>>:.;: CA ION................................................................ .. ......... 1 NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application. form, only those items related to,your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. Please print or type, and attach additional sheets if necessary. APPLICANT TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES NAME: kie arvip —AiI44,11 —*REZONE FROM ( TO ) $ V SPECIAL PERMIT ADDRESS: D / TEMPORARY PERMIT Z ICY/H1G�er 6aly` C ,v1" CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT o,o2d —SITE PLAN APPROVAL CITY: ��// ZIP: _SPECIAL PERMIT - GRADE&FILL gii7CA) (145%t gerOS-5 (NO. CU.YDS: ) ___*VARIANCE TELEPHONE NUMBER: (FROM SECTION: ) 2 7/— 962Z _ROUTINE VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PERMIT CONTACT PERSON • (*JUSTIFICATION REQUIRED) NAME: SUBDIVISION: $ 6,0 Lie,) _SHORT PLAT ADDRESS: _ 2 TENTATIVE PLAT �9 �rintele,-4 7' _PRELIMINARY PLAT "FINAL PLAT CITY: ZIP: *WAIVER 4,4/t) -.Se-" *(JUSTIFICATION REQUIRED) NO. OF LOTS: ' TELEPHONE NUMBER: PLAT NAME: 2S-S-=/v 5�0 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ OWNER —PRELIMINARY NAME: _FINAL J h ), lBrry rJale Lied • P.U.D.NAME: ADDRESS: ' 4 // //�� .28`I d"er/mrete�ZealiFt —BINDING SITE PLAN: $ CITY:, �� ) ZIP: MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ TELEPHONE NUMBER: 027/ — .202 ci —TENTATIVE PRELIMINARY _ LOCATION FINAL PROPERTY ADDRESS: PARK NAME: O / Aerrn /e/4JEa S/2 NO. OF SPACES: EXISTING USE: /9I6,..ep.a#,Amer= I r--Or¢ic.p ZONING: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ (0 4/ Paiiic aye . PROPOSED USE: j dire Pail ILTerms "d- !' G•e TOTAL FEES: $ AREA:(2919Set SQ. FT. OF PROPERTY: PLANNING DIVA12 CITY OF RENTON YF USE ONLY - -ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING DATE RECEIVED: OCT 2 6 1989 APPLICATION RECEIVED &DETERMINED TO BE: DATE ROUTED: REc fJ�U V ED ACCEPTED,NOTIFICATION SENT: 11I4141 — INCOMPLETE,NOTIFICATION SENT: BY: Master Application Form Page 2 Legal description of property (if more space is required, please attach a separate sheet). SEE ,P otir\ P196 F P/A /5 • AFFIDAVIT RO/VA_D L I El , being duly sworn, declare that I am (please check one) > the authorized representative to act for the property owner, the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND S ORN TO BEFORE ME THIS �,5-a_'DAY OF d)L' - __) 19 (i) NOTARY.'\PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHiNGTON; ZESIDING AT: &-7 ,[-tom,' (Name of Notary Public) (Signature of $vwne-r) /¢Ge-tvT� ied e64 7O 7 2 / Peri eYei- 6 s%_ (Address) (Ad ss) 4. 9daaY Pi/hiNL rovA -s- (City/State/Zip) (City/State/Gip) 6,,57 7G (Telephone) (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other material required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." RtnMastr Revised 9/89 } • t:1 ' .' .. F.t • 43 II@IOTIM LIEN LEASE MAR 021 )907 � �;�inning at the intersection of Rainier Avenue North and Airport Way North; i 'Thence S 87'30'17" E a distance of 744 .03 feet, to a point located on the centerline I.l of. Airport Way North; Th ence N 4'49'43" W a distance of 294.74 feet to a point located on the Renton Airport runway centerline referred to as Station 0+00; Thence N 4'49'43" W a distance of 170.00 feet' I Thence N 85°10'17" E a distance of 350.00 feet; , ' Thence N 84°45"31" E a distance of 548.68 feet; Thence S 58°54'09" E a•, distance of 83.63 feet to the True Point of Beginning; H' . Thence N 49" 59'37" E a distance of 16.07 feet to the point of beginning of a curve to the right having a radius of 35.00 feet; .. Thence northeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 88°34'06" an arc length of 54,10 .feet; ' Thence S 41°26'17" t a distance of 232.37 feet; ience S 16°38'11" E a distance of 90.00 feet; Thence N 58'41 '44" W a distance of 331 .R3 feet to the point of beginning of a curve to the right having a radius of 20.00 feet; Thence northwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 101°39.'27" an arc length of 35.49 feet; Thence N 42'57'43" E a distance of 69.13 feet to the True Point of Beginning. 1 Containing an area of 29,749 O1 Square feet. 1 i • 1 1 ROBERTSON AVIATION CORPORATION G!;l'OF F JffON RE C EIV ED OCT 31 1989 October 27, 1989 COW,UNMe av LOPMENT DEPARTMENT Mr. Ken Nyberg, Director Community Development Department City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Ken: Thank you for your interest in our Renton Airport office addition. I appreciate your involvement and speedy reply. To say I 'm disappointed in your decision is truly and under- statement, but I accept your opinion. In fact, I have already re-filed for a new hearing on the design change. We do not want to lose the rights that we now have in regard to our build- ing addition because of this requirement. It is our understanding that the only thing standing in the way of our being issued a building permit is the Hearing Examiner ' s approval of the new building design and a few minor corrections to our existing plans . I do want to set the record straight with the City. In paragraph 3 of your letter, you state that "The applicant will work with staff. " I did not arbitrarily just change the building from a three story to a two story structure without first talking to the Public Works Department. This new design was discussed, and I thought we had the City ' s approval to go ahead. I would not spend thousands of dollars on a design that was in question. Robertson has been a tenant on the airport for almost twenty years. During that period of time, we were involved in a number of projects that needed City approval. Our contact for such matters was always the Airport Manager through the Public Works Department. We thought what we did was the proper and correct approach. We have always tried to follow the rules and get along. This confusion has caused me a real hardship, undue delay and consider- 14 l Robertson Aviation Corporation Renton Municipal Airport — Will Rodgers Wiley Post Memorial Sea Plane Base 289 Perimeter Road E. Renton, WA 98055 lipakT%A (206)271-9682 Mr. Ken Nyberg, Director October 27, 1989 Page Two able expense. Please let me know what else I can do to help correct this unfortunate situation. Thanking you again for you and your staff ' s help on this project. Sincerely, ROBERTS AVIATION CORPORATION Ronald L. Lien President _ ;E -.TSk_ ' AVIATIo i CuR October 24, 1989 '3 CITY OF RENTON pT'p�®/yPA—�/ ON Building and Zoning Department OCT Municipal Building ?6 200 Mill Avenue South 1989 Renton, Washington 98055• Re: Conditional Use Permit Subject: Description/Justification Letter To: Hearing Examiner This proposal consists of a two story addition to the existing office. It will be surrounded on three sides by the existing structure and be within the allowable high limitations set forth by the zoning regulations. The office will match the existing office in material and appearance. The entire proposal is contained within the boundaries of the Renton Airport and is compatible with the surrounding structures and uses. Across East Perimeter Road is the Cedar River and beyond that is the Renton Stadium, therefore this new structure does not adversely affect any surrounding property owners. It is the intent of the owner to create a pleasing facility for the occupants of the new structure while enlarging the facility to maintain the growth of the company. New landscaping areas are planned around the new proposal to enhance the exterior appearance of structure. The following is an item by item listing of the criteria required for the conditional use permit. A. Comprehensive Plan: This proposal is compatible with the surrounding uses and is on the Renton Airport property. The property upon which the new addition is planned already has existing structures performing the tasks for which the additions are intended. The proposal conforms to the existing zoning ordinances and comprehensive plan; it meets all the criteria for which the property is intended. B. Community Need: This proposal is a relatively small addition to the airport related functions and does not create any undue negative problems for the area. The site is suited for the purpose proposed. C. Effect on Adjacent Properties: The lot coverage and yard requirements conform to the zoning requirements for this site. The maximum height limitations are not exceeded by this proposal. 12411111111116. Robertson Aviation Corporation Renton Municipal Airport — Will Rodgers Wiley Post Memorial Sea Plane Base v, 289 Perimeter Road E. Renton, WA 98055 ?_` (206)271-9682 CITY OF RENTON Building and Zoning Department October 24, 1989 Page Two D. Compatibility: This proposal is compatible with the surround- ing structures and neighborhood. By design, the new office is surrounded on three sides by existing structure and the new hangar is similar in design to the adjacent structure. E. Parking: Parking requirements will be met for the uses intended under the current parking criteria. F. Traffic: Traffic in and around the new proposal will not be adversely affected. Access to and from the proposal will be within the guidelines set for the traffic engineering regulations. G. Noise, Glare: There should be no noticeable increase in the noise levels now originating from the airport. Glare will be kept to a minimum by having low light levels, mostly originating from the interior of the office itself. There is also nothing directly opposite the proposal to be adversely affected by it. H. Landscaping: Landscaping will be provided to enhance the surrounding area and to create a pleasing and aesthetically enjoyable space in accordance with the landscape criteria for the area. I. Accessory Uses: There are no such accessory uses planned. J. Conversion: There are no plans to convert any of the exist- ing buildings to a conditional use. K. Public Improvements: This proposal should not create any undue burden on public improvements, facilities, utilities or services. If you have any questions or need further explanation, please don't hesitate to call. Yours very truly, ROBER N AVIATION CORPORATION Ronald L. Lien President _<:51, • • srh iao-8'1 • CIT O ON ENVIRONMEN AL• • CF�E CKLI Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An ' Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probably significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, If it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. • • Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist ask you •to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. • Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply". IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). . For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 1� O ber4 ,1.1 / I et 4/D eV /9-444. f.+ 2. Name of applicant: Rory SEA) 3. Address and phone number of applicant'and contact person: ZS 9 Pe -,n'l e1 er £vat Ea 1 2��- /6 S/D 4. Date checklist prepared: l U/24/ Pq 5. Agency requesting checklist: C- 7'y of ec-417bo.1) &/# f4 A pR,71 f94' • PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON OCT 2 6 1989 .RECEIVE® • • • -2- • • 6. Priposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): 4 oNS111-0S7 1,'o/t 5c ea i/eJ-7LD 5®®ia X 5 7-he Aelek17 7. Di you have any plans for future, additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No • • 8. L st any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be p epared, directly related to this proposal. 9. to you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. MO 10. I ist any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if nown. / �l i 6&-e. E�� (,►rye a,/�G/01.9 y�I�l�,y(��/,f}a�a a �f��q+ n ���C ,�' U.Ctr nY-o ,t/to-.Q1,,Ne Pev-0 aft. 11. ive brief, complete description of your proposal, including the• proposed uses and the .he of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask ou to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. j7i-oro51,1,® i 5 �ay G (2 ) 7/dipS Tory c?oo 7er4me LQ 44& Bier” Olf/e a A 4e ,4 -fo )44 ,#y w," $711-mre'ise r-C e)t i s+i N f a;'c/ ft. e e f.$e ®,,(-. / p,re.c - v-oo /' es.k,.Gr 4id,/ ?r.e4 . 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans • submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Yh 2 60 re,ice,S c°/ p )ems `. /5 : 4 GcFt Gt 2 e 9 4.10/41-te mr B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one);CP rolling, hilly, steep, slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) • c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, scaly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime.farmland. d. Are there surface indications Or history of unstable Soils In the Immediate vicinity? If so, describe. •��1@ e- are. n9d e.,4) PzociocslAp (pf km/Si�Zbid• pv • • -3- • • e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantifies of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. f pecri- dae excal�R -, I went'(` CorJSi4 /t/r 'r'Lte 4-0/6r4$ir g j� q roe,'A. el drat f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally detscribfe. / ,f �+ 15 /l to�! ei h e/� '/�44 - erne E/ZO5/ 4.1 G/l,OG4/ d G G / 5tw/ee 7`4te t-oposer/ R� �T/e9 &Jo e be SurYocr.r✓dhe� cot/ 5 5I��'S 4y' The ere '54-1,4:7 P 57714CTi,,e • g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? • 30 % • h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: A10 CoaJ a5- N� ^1-rc ettere- esf tt5U�'irk�tt re-E° 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Some_ 6,w/1.. f-re'r1n Catle4/0.0! q,u� �? e✓ s-mis5!®4� T4 ,peeed ^ecnr +-1'tt a "/-y®e 8 Fro)e04. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? • ND c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any:. kIo Con.hl-ralf Mett5KreS tUece5S ete r� °tte 7' 71-4a . StZa o p egvoS.a a id *-y r .e of CoNS71ruc71/u.a.J /ed5.e-/. 3. . WATER a. Surface: 1) Is (here any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Th C 6-- let(le✓ l5 Yo55 Me STe�CT To -/-he- N E 2) Will the project require any work over, In, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If. yes, please describe and attach available plans. ye-5 • 7-11 t e ro r o sea I /5 f1I au/ /6 D f-ee-71 �Yo fL e Ce®o- ,L�i UC'✓ 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. No ft //t�9 O� D,_ed9 w t/1 �e regctcr,ec I & 6r ►-ocf.4J /jte 1ete...er-. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Na 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. N® 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type .of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. • • 1�� • • • • -4- • • b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. NO • 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the// system(s) are expected to serve. NO 4045l e /�tctlerla � to l i be ¢/seAa r9� e 410 +It? 9 rO Vd c. Water Runoff (including storm water): • 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. ST®e rva w 6-74F oeu.v- oFic /'// 4e cD!( 04v1 15uer L4-, J !ADO The &x157/4? s ' 7 i1t -no* //i1/9. 5 €cA 6-0,4) ®74. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. I`h d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Srnz6eA. tenay, TfIC .NEGc•� i� p� w►11 be Coltcc1eJ Itsi40 .t lees avel elocut S®oa //✓ eel yrr /./ 4. Plants 'TAe ref 57in.7 5�-Drib,..a��z�n a/ Coo e#/tr�/ a 7/0 a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other y evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other k shrubs grass crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants:_water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? I) ®et-If/WOGs . TEEe= to/I be re. outrri Sert,tis Glade Gv,/I be reo,«t)eef art 'tie *rem. o-t 641Sipue1104.' • c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. d. • Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, •or other measure to preserve i,r enhance vegetation on the site, if any: J L LQA./c 5cez !P-L Go;// �JQ uonA.pit •We hd et,AA pc! et1,4 w ►3. excs-1�L�� Gkr� av,// Exuhl��vc c e Coca l 1.)P9elaitloAt. 5. Animals • a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site •r are known to be on or near the site: • Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other N/f} Mammals: deer bear, elk, beaver, other NIA - Fish: bass salmon trout, herring, shellfish,,other • -5- • b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NoNe c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Qom s-(rueltra a to;//ti'7L lake l��pP't�c• ' 1,4 'Fite EPE-e- Mire ve leer re bap e. i".e.R5a re.s W;// be C995e2 7 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, wood, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. tLe - l tcrlr- 40;rl be aye. Weer �LP9Lr�irt�. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. tVd c. What kinds of energy conservation features are Included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy Impacts, if any: 7E- p-O , r— a%J. LL /dlt'E-T The k-e Gt tr-er444e. wT d7` the tL2 S 14-11A rto 5 i Ire E` 6 nle F.6,Y Code 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. • NO I) Describe special emergency services that might be required. A O ezPea'retl EPsrt.Ere c"eve�` Sev-ute e Will b De 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmentalhealth hazards, if any: ER)y(vesa)Ateitif'r Ho lam` naact , Qkr rUo�7 ArvTtclPereele. • b. Noise I) What types of noise exist in the areas which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? PpaJ 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. . Co Ais/Lr e-' 470.tl''.Nd r 5¢r or20u Id ,be Aexrd -(turn ?Le. Chi rut s fry ita, vure ' G�or(c% bte,u.e5. Lem, Terwa.,NprS e .preble...-ts ate Ritgie foet4 r 3) Proposed measures to reduce or Control noise impacts, if any:// ikc:nrf" Tea''`" No15e 5 ft 0..tcf he Li a�ed /o Abp.x„,,.e r�O rc him1r"a 8. Land and Shoreline Use • a. - What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? lrp rr-(,e4e are aN ( 32 "rkr•c.e Sselff&S 0,a 74tiP CJ�'v vLA! �t cd Pc,ad o stele. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, .describe. • • -6- • c Describe any structures on the site. `7F,eF /S 4 D1./ 5"relair Off,c a1I Th c Al-op.e6.44 •. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? N® 4. What is the current zoning classification of the site? 1. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? �lr�or� GC ie."7 • If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. ,JQ� . i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? k. Proposed measures to.avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and. plans, if any: N A e. ecra i t i • 9. Housing 7 a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. 4l� • b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. IY14" • c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: 1/4" 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any. proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? k10 - U IEa)5 I.tot .t D Inc. 0 esretiC7 ep c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: to Ne_ ,r-eratLred • 11. Light and Glare -7- • • • a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? � j iV ,y . L y 711 e- G-r9/11 o - , rrAt7 'f G'i I `rLl C � Esl1�d!`-tu, ("Ad /.)' f �Gf b 61 f vev mt tA I / sP a SCR tro aE+ Jat kc b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? f jotJe d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Nome- eruore.et 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? lee A f Q00 57-61,I k trt 15 /9-c rw TM.e Ceek,, b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. • • c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any 9 /� �;. Io,tsafI ,l a`; Sc ,tee "tads: . 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. 4/4 b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scienAAt''ific,or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: NI • ti • f . • • • • • -8- • 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets ,and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. 71 e r-e /5 d}n) Ex 15T/a-eCI f}'ce 55 0ni /-p #aeris?.te/tE'✓ itcsal,e77E775-7- 6 -f L eVo#' Prer rly 1-e -� b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? • UNka A) • • c. I-low many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? /9 57-44.4.S z-votea be . /1)& 5T9-Lt. .5 waali 4e ,Frel d. Will. the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? • e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or ai transportation? If so, generally describe. T//E proreit- Is o i /`.triovrt rakrerltrr, e &Oa/ iVot /l�l�G f-/B re W;1`1, A•9er�p®zr�' Oep�✓Q'��D�fl 9 f. Flow many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. .f,7 rid/G/V0t6)e✓ g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: /U0 Cn/-th4(r iliteat;urz";a IJecesf1-gq 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for exampl•: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, general y describe. 0,t)iy "gte 5 M Ctt-cite Watt tel be 1-•e ue1--tee/ ,k 4--otte•r gig wey' b. Proposed measures toreduce or control direct impacts on public services, if an . /DA) Ift,ottv:ed • 16. Utilities • 1 re'rcle ,fuse services cu lt" a lio eY sanitar avai 1e at the site: atural ga`s• �;r 1 p i , y sewer, system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing he service, and the general construction activities on the site or In the immedi to vicinity which might be heeded. • .-L -c-TA IC 4be, $94t' '2 . •/n The 41 /1-, 7 be like.t-cQ ' • -9- C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it in ; It Issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentatio or willful lack full disclosure on my part. • Proponent: Name Printed: 1d/V L! l-/1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • t ' r rr. • -10- • D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS ( his sheet should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and . programs. Do not use this sheet for project actions.) ecause these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them In conjunction ith the list of the elements of the environment. hen answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of ctivities likely to result 'from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity tr at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in eneral terms. 1. Iow would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; roduction, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? The_ ph01C G� �(OSx L;E , W di A)d ,LZUe- Q/t/ / ure;? /� ele4s a booms (t Proposed measure's to avoid or reduce such increases are: 'Voue leer te-eci • 2. llow would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? r+ at,t-1c! kciu e N fiff • Proposed measures to protect-or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: /A)(>►1/4-)2 \--t7 t t di 3. I-low would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The \-eSoU.Yc.- Wov.(oi be eotis.r pm.e t-e.) 7 led).Ica/ du 0 StAAA,1-1-to A) a dt) b y 'Kee Gr'S e- 0-p 6,,e a!9 gx t/ek-414- Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: s&at7 E�Jet-�� � lC e/01- Lfec�l-f-tee./ 'iyu��s Ct,vA✓ ere/4erOke�?O % G�� l 1,0a5ttt/ILE>J 57 7 FNcee4 f CoD� s&i// Ile% cv.W,, E-.)cr-ei y✓ ��a15��-1�'��io 4/ 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands,n floodplains, or prime farmlands? dc( 5 Lo Lo e duo / co +k e irk Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: h0 5. I-low would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing0 plans? f /JBre S 40,41 4e- /1.)0 r¢ t ec4 c/1) - /!e_ L.a4iG` ale- chav-e /,n .2• G�se ee e to rorocr/ I .s prI on.a // 564t-y e.1 Ajoici b y `e �lv-e �N� i5 o/ve a T‘� y `e r�i GUG� 15 aj\ c(v AI-6 �;�-te ' - o be bu 11-1- o 444 s le'cel ee",J • -11- • Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use Impacts are: 014—g: tN© To '�l-C zy Sl4ee-g-4iIPc /141:7� ' irtrnR Su re.�e/ A , e • A aid 1~ccot41 r.tst e ,,A A) . 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? / Tl/e-i� sArktac+r be /V0 ,qua keJ17 Demar4. o Ai TAL& e 7 /`le: Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: IUD Ale- 1-e ct 1 --era' • 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for.the protection of the environment. Mo. Coy GIG' ,4�7ic f -0 . SIGNATURE • I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it • Jit issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentati• ,r willful of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: ,'' Name Printed: 1.0 /% L-/L-i • • • • • • • , • • • • . • .. .• • • . . . • • . . . • • • • . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . • . . • . • . . . . . •.• • . ... . .. •,. . . . . . • • . . . . • . , . .. .. .., . - ..- . . .. . . • . • • • . ..• • . : • , . • , . • . • . • . ,_ . • • .--• • - . - - • • . . • ,,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . - • • .. ., .,-... ., • '.'. -„ -.-. . .- , ... . • • . . .. • . • • - '. • _ . . _ . . . . . _ . , . . '•• •. -. , -,...-,,,.-: . •,- • . ,• ' • • . _ . . • . . , • • • •• ' - • • • - • . 7.•-• - " -,. .•,••••7.,---,:;::,--,..•'•-•,:7;"..:::--•.-.:::7...7...:.---,7,-7-:'-•-•''. -•••••r.-:,..'..7.-.•":"1-..,.:1•:.-::.„;.7:...•.-.=:,...--• ',77,,,-.--,;-.:::„.:,-......i.,:..• ....,...•-:-..:•••.:,,,,•:,•;,,,7,,,,..,-,:.f,,,..,•:•„,:,,,,,,•,,,_!.-&.eL7;'7.s;;--Z4,,..-.3-.,-.&.h=4,•••••r,-----0,Wa?..slex,,%,..,,,,A• • • - •• •••••'• •-. •• • --••••-: :--:.•-•---•. --,-,••:"..az•-.,- -:.--;.-....:-::_---.-...,-,--....----...:,--- -.:;,ip•z...•;.4-1-•:.4,4--.ir-coi:-.*vh-- -:(6..k.ilkp,,,I.,11.,•s",:lr,-,!i-f.-e$:,4•0•“-a.r..,...:-c-s,.....-_,•,,-•,._,.-....,.•.... ---. . . ,,-.. •-.. -: .,---.. ....:.--.....--.•••••-.-.•,-.3.:-;,:•-.i.,:ik.4.-.•,z,-;-.,-,4.-„,.:t.,*1,•.-ArifA4-?-..,f.k--14".4ok-Sge.-rg•,..;:•_-.5s:••51-,15.7,:-..?°,:_-_f's•..-tlt-PT•-•,-•-:•.-7,7---;,--.;;; -.L..:4-•;•••-----.::*4!'••;',.. '17-',.''.1•••:i•gi.;:ril,-7 :4.1W.;" '":-'-'7'---` 1".".. .•- -.,,-,--,...,...,,, --,,,,,,,Ait'*•;;;;Jr-67g.i7..Ve.,.V.V•Oe-k'.]-•:;',41'.:.f-Y-3."'..;1',Itzi'.il v7'.:-•,-;*".••---..,•?'•...t.-7,•;•:7',7;(4:1:7 s.'qi;',;:-'-',-;:`--''''!-L".....;-:::'/.7',4••;••••''''':1....4.4.?•.1.47.ii;',;-;.--Cs••'•?:;;V-44-4??;',.1,---7???.14.9•.i!.-11.13 -"-;:3--f-,.t,;:.f.".7...;:•,;;••;,.7...,-t.'7-7.,•-.,,,::,774.3,7:-.,:7.,77-4,7--4-777' '7•••••77-•i•-•,''',:".-777"7:'':'-...':'7',...',-7..'•,:%:.' •_.---::-.•,,.-.1:•-•;--:4;:5:,--•:.-.;:-.7^,i--1--;:„,,'-".;•<2;7:;,,;,:q:-.4',"^-V?iiq -7:4=7€'52.6. , ,,,,,..::, ,, t ,„'Jt.;1.,...Z1.,-,,....,..-.,-;?...;,,?_:•,3,:j.,-;';:::?.*:.,-.L..,-,r..:T.,'•,--, ---..'.-,,.:,.-•-..7.,-:-7-.:,.,.:.....:_-•---:',.,.•- .,--,----,f.:, ,1;71.--:•,--...t-",i-),.,-,,,-7::::':7-7•: •,.:.....:.t..•:::7,'7.-•?:'71777-7f.---•i)17---•,`,:',77--..-7-,'.7-3.=,77--'::7••••7.‘7:7•-.!•17,::-.7 777.7'.7'7.-7:--"'7`-7-:•-•''''.:..77f:-•7,.,--;7.--,-i 7-_,---,711,,,..-...-4.7:-.--:-.f.'7•.,77,.-'•.2.:.-.!:..1:7•-•;7:;;-..-::.::.:,•:-"...'.,-,;1:-.,7ff-,..---:.7;77:-.-77 7-;:,-'!::,.-.7-:7,77-;71-.:,,•1.--..'•;;;.,7-.-••7:7 r.:..f.'"- •:-:'-7.`l•'--•7"-.-'''.C '7:7-,7,7••••:7- -.7.7.-7-, 7-7•'.••,- 7 • • ''-- 77 .- ---•'• • '.7 7:•7••• ''••• ••- 7•--7•.:..7--:l:_'-7-7:::.:. .•:••••!..7-...7:'::'.7 7,..‘''-f..7.,:-..‘7•-•-•r.7.j.:,f,'::-...:•-•-'.'.: :-.7•:-..fili:-7?'7,-: t7 f•;•'7•.77'.'-.:7,7. _'.7•;::11•71;7':•:'-7 ';'...7-:•?.....:-..--77•-;;•-':...--•3-5.'..:::•7:::.-.•••":-.••-•.---'•.-',--.•--.•:•:--,t."•':-:';.•-•:•-,•1•-.•••• --• - • •• -:-..-:.-.: ...---.--• •-•-,..--,--,''-•.•;a•-:-----;.-`-;-•-•'",:'•:• -'7,7q.':-•....,:_!;•f:,:::.--.7-'.-.••••% .:••••..:••-••-...:---;--7-''.••.7:1-,,•••:-.•••••;•:•.--:-.-•.•••‘''.:'-'.'-‘-i';'."!-:,;-.. :•.--:--•''::•t•-•-:'''••--.''...---;'.- -,--•-•.-.-*--,-,:•=7".::',..--,-.T..-.:7,--,7,-;•,7:::,•-_•,..--.::---. ..11.... .Z..f.,--•";.,----.ct•:-',..7-..'-a•--::"-..,.,„:„.-,..,-,-s.,..L,:ir...7:15:.-•,^:,-1.,::.,.., • =,,•-;.-:::-;',..,:-:-:,--.z.'•••••,--.:,.:.:-..-_'--,:-.-. .:•',-..,,,..•-•.. .----:'-'''•-t."?.->;',.'-:-....1*--•:: -- • • -..•--•..,,-, •., ,.... .• .--.•.:-,•47., •'.-:•-.---.1.,•-•,--,:.--.17- --:: . • .• -7-:.-.7.• -;•••-:*-- ....--:-.:-.•:..7-17.71.7---1.:J..7.'"),-::::;•-•-•••7-7..;‘':.-7-4.%•-•..i•-:2-7-7Z.:-71.•••••••••-•:::-::.-••:•Z-J7•,11 DUPL I C A T E R . .., ... . . . . . . ... .. .. ,_ _ , . ...., •• ..._. . ..... OFRENTON ..:•--,_:_:=_T.•:.,::_,,..::•,...-:•.--_-.,:•••••-,...,--_•-•:•-,:-:.•..E('-C-::EI TI F)"T DUF..iL I CATE RECEIPT ••-•::::•.,•,:•-:..t.,:•:',..,:_;:iv.•;-,,,,,.?,-::::-.:•-,•,•:- ..,,,.-•,,::,•••••,-•_• .'••-•---:-:-!-'31'.:-.-----:;4_.:_t•••,-.-.-',.,::-,4-:;-;:,•-•:-..-7-! - . • .....•:•':•••.‘--...--'-•:r a•: ....7-;:,--.,--?,-,.7 .'..,-.;.....i.:-_-,:•.--.; •-•,-.7•-.7•'!:. .,;•.:1•Li.,---'-....,;. ,,':.=•-- '•:-.,',.,---"-/ ,•‘•'.•1•-,:,-.-,',k•-;-'1--,.:7,a-,-..-.4.-":'•', • .-.-.•--- '.. -'--•---:'---...•••-•I•'.7.1:ii-•••-••'-...':•-----:,'fif•.1::::•-•:.7-:'-.::,-":7.-,',..:.-7---,::•.•;2'::- ', -•-:--:-.;..-••••-_, C I TY TREASURER 33,ct . - ., ....--: ::.: -.-...-•-• ,.,..-•.:.,•:::_.,-.••,:-.....:,--..„.,•:._.„:..:-...:::•......:-. ••......:-..,:„._.,...:_., r,-,:,,••:...-.-..:.-.--........" .-._..,,....,• :...,:,-,::• . . . ._ ... . ,,._ .:. ... 4:14 pm ... . . . . . . . . _ , :.. . . ... . . ,.. ...... .., .. ,. .. .., 10-25-'1989 .-?:_-.,:,,,,,,...,. •-•, -,...,,g-7-,...--1. ...-t..,1,-. • •. ''' • ' ..-":...%-a..r,..Thts";•--"•''''z. .,'''g/rii,;_ iffA741•Pd2V:•'Nr''' 'it"'''4.;^:4M REG/RC:P,. • -02 Ir9 7 T - -Ir- === AMOUNT === •'6,,7.'''''F•4"..-.1-'- ,-- ..• -s.c-...-':- * : '.1...'f.'-`,.,••'--tii7-.._,..'%;;.•-`,.,•-•!- --'''', . -._,-,;_-_,2.:-_,%.4'.,11, _,-7'4,,AftEkr,,:•,,:i:--1.„,,S;e„,;,,-",,Ce-',.'4*->::',;--:1.--p....,....... cAsi_IIER ID: I $.4,20.00 's-,-'<••".e.j .-,• -•.s•7• 7,----.• •-'"......:,::::..--.---: ..":-_,:-.•••••••••:-.-7,‘"-;--1.---'.'"•-'•-:-'''''•-•--'•..i-•:" -..:- ti 1 c-EL LANEOU 6 RE VE .._:...-.--.:•-•.--,s.•-••...‘--"4•-•--E.•-:-..---,,a-r-..--x--?•;,'-,-•.•,---` ..---;.-•,..•••••-:„.-7- .:,-f-F.21;,',-.Z.,-;_,:"-,-..,', ' '- .. .-, •.".•7':-."!:,. .-I'•'. '-'.--.'..•..‘....-.'-'.-.''''':'-,- - -,:1--•-•:•---.• - uriD I CIO f-2 ,, ni.., nocio r;.-:_-•S:-:=-4:4-...,-`•,-,r,..,s1.-F-'-&--',•-:-.k-s;.1- - • •:. -:.-...;,-..:•• .......,.:_•.-•7:.: :-i.•:•:--.:'7:--;7_'..'-,:•-:•-•- 7-,_,•:---,,,,•':.•:•;•; .131j.345.L,.1.•-J•- $300.00 .•i-1.1:•;c:-=';,••V•-? ii•,!::;:.;::i'::.--4.:-.•'•/ ulU . 1••••..-...:,...•;-:..--•:,,-•••:;•,,...1-;:.7.::1_:':,:..::•."_;:,•::_i;,:;,';•:11.-..•:i1.-IF:....1:•:.-....„--z-'1::1,.;::::;;.:--.::-'!--.:;:11•;-..':::-....:....,:Z'.!,: :‘ :::').:,-.7.--.;._.,..„;':...:::,.::./:,:f...2:7-:-__;:r.::',•.:1: c's ii_0- L.:.1111,1.1ES C.:IsEclUt-SUB A4.CM5,EEI:i Iii S.oR0E.VI:1 Ei...B...11.3 •;-;;;.......--,.--i...-.•:„.-: -.;,-,g.;:.,,...-.:!s'..fi::•,:.,.'i.z.;:,-. .-,:,-: • . ._•• -. ._- •-.....--...--..,--.-.-•-.•.•-,..--..-'•••••••••••.- •••-"-•.-:':•-•,-"-7---,---.••',' AI 10.Ltiji.J.I__.3 • . .., . ., $64.00 -•&-..-.•:-....,-.:•E„..,,...--.,..- --,,,,-.1,-.7•••:-.-•:••,.7.-..-..."•,•:••••': ---'s -: III FLI ANE01.1b REvE ....----:•:F,•?:?"..,-,-i-A'•7•:,.Z%-,::.7.. t1:1,-,:.`,.;-,:.::7,7,-,..,. - _.'2.' : :'.7.7'.,. ..":::.--,'',..:::•7'1, .•--;-:::"....„-•,-'-:',---,- ,•::.'." -.:: ''" '-'-:,_,-.-7 311 10 b ., - .‘.,-..:,:•;:-..,t':......:1;7,-...!..'...,,,,,.,-.;,-. •"'...2,-., .' -- REVIEW • -.-_:::::,•,•;.••..-- ,.....•••:,..,..--•,.i::.-.-,;..-...-.•: • : : ,:. . .. :..: .„::...,.-..:,..-..:-,:_:,.,......-:.:::.,7•-•:-.77.',•,',--7 77:-'?,...-7--7.?..-----7f,-.'-:'--.:.•.7- ,-7:',-.;•- ENV „ ,• 1 III I:Orli:I •.1"-ikf t,.._,-•,.`V).,..:;•:: •%•.;4•' s-i•%;1..‘':••.-- . ' -- •- :" • •.•• ••• :•-•"'.: •... • .. -, ..•. ....,:•• IM0.0.11 i•- •`1 - '..74.•:;''.--i,',I1-11;',•'4-11k,r-;•'''',4 -:'i•-:•:.•f?..;?.&• :. ,..--;_petr. :47.--.':-..,•,..-',;::::%.7f'..-?.p.C,..b-,,,,,"..), $934.00 '.1-.,.,-.-7,.,..,-..,-- -; :ts!k,:7._:-,,f'.':':-.•:7r?:'- TOTAL DUE RECEIVED FROM .:•.•_ -_--,,......_•-....,:.-•••:,..:...•:,..:-,,-.....•-•..-:•••_:-:-z•-.... : • 7•-',.< • .:7•:%,...::..,.---....1..."••••:.•'.....,.....`•••"7...'-'••- ROBERTSON AVIATION • tz..--'R'.--7k."'-.4---'3-4..,41e.:- /-'72,-;.;,::•..7.:,.-5. •• •,,,,,-,-,„:„...;.;,..,,,,,,r....7,:.....-..;;;;;;,, ,...:&.fsc.1.,,..,...,:%:•;..-,:•., $934.00 .i...r•-•,. .,-,-.-k.:2,z---,,--.:.-*„...4.,‘,------,..--2-.,......:•.f,.' . --'-----.4,••••--•;•.....,'7"::;7'?.,-4•A'.--1.-:..;,?....v,*.-1-.4.,,,--4 ,0,7,,:.!!:::„..;,„...I_._,,,,,,..,_,. ..„.,,......,..,_„‘„...,..... cHE,..K . ' ..:":-';f:-F7!_e=•.,14'.-:-..‘'..,•:---.,-,..,• :.,,•,;,-,,k-,-.-.,--".,,,.. .,...r',.r.,-.,-,,-,.,^-,-.t.,.'5.5.--:•-•! -';.-.7.`---J, "---se--'-'5-•-- . 0 TOTAL TENDERED $94 0 $0.130 : . - ,•,...•-_-::•-_-; ..••-•;--.....::•:-,..,..:7:„ :::.,..•-,-,,,,...--...11,..-.....-,..'•:•-:.;••,.::.-,•,:,,,,,,••....,-,,,:i,,,-:--_-7•,,%,.:..2.;.;:i-•- ...--,,:.z.r.f•-7.7-.,:::.-7-,:-..,,,.-;• ,-,•••": ":-.-.-.............:..-..'" - T- . •-'.',-•--,•;:•------•:-:*;.•::,--',-----.-,•!:,..._-...--.,,:-,-:•••.:•,-------..-Y.- '--','.----:-:=•..-'7'3-: :: -• -'',-...,-;,...3'.:1-.':••±..•.-,..-..,:•":•,.;.-...-•,•17-:•,•••::::::?:',:;.;•.-- C:1-IANGE DUE -:-.-,••..,:-=/-*a:..;-•••••'--,i•.••::::,-,....:•‘..-,.-_--,-.)..i...-.-.=-7:•.,..,-.:.. • •• -. - ": , ', •-,• . • :•:: .• - • .•....-•-•: -. • -.7.:-.••••..,. , I-ATE RECEIPT DLIPLIC:ATE RECEIPT CUFL •-::-,'-'14-Z..-.",-:.ii-i-;:a.,==,- -,ii.,....,Z,i-j-•--:'1-.-•:rft":,....,:".,,• • ' .. . -' .•":.-:•-•,,-....,---••••••;•.:::7...,-;-:.••:.i'-,.,-..-‘---.;•,-.'•:-...--:-'.•7::-.,...'•-•.'.•'.'•••:`-',:•-.•.';'?--7"'ilt..-a•-•'. • --•---,1.:--,,,•-•:::',:r-r..C.'•...:',--•=,,,-. .4••;,...,•.-!-;-•.7.:-..‘7.--,.•.- . . .. . ,.... a. .,... .. ... , ..... ._ . . ........ ,a,-).•=f.,--a-. .----:-:.•-•p.li-,..1-...,„c4-rsl :1,-.Z.,' .. . .- ..... . - - .. . . . , ,..,..•-, 3-7.'.•-,s. .-- 77-'•,,,Y. -•:'-Pi.-,,,-,2;•••••-•••- . . ....• ....... ....,,f...1•:,.-....:•.•••,,,y.,....,:•.:..-,......::,,-,.....,•:•••....•.....7-:.--,-',.•...,'--:„*..7.-,...:!.,.,.-:.-",,-.:•,..-:,-; -.7•E----?:. -;;;',:-..i -':-.,:f;•4''- •"-‘•'•'".•'-..'tli•-:7,-,•-•,: i•-,,,:,•-•'-.,•F•l•- - -•4',..'.:','‘.*".•=-*•.44,we,s2.-.75v74..,-, • - --•• ••;.:•"•-•-, ,•••'.--•'--1J;-..:.•':-•:--•:--,..‘.--.'7:-",.._•.'--1 .1.'•':-...•-•;'..,!.;,-,.-•;;;•.-.•;••=•:.:-‘1.:L;',':•-:•f;-‘,':-7--::,.7:-...-;',;'•::-:•,!-F;:., ---q.;--....r...-,,,,r."-,;•7;:i‹,t- :•,r,r...,.-, -•-:-'`:-.---., •••."--••:-'-:•••,...-::,::.a7'.---....:-:-;:•41,:::.-'7.••-_-.-,:,-:•;'.7.':•‘:,.---,;-•:•.::".-1:;-.1'..::-';'.•• .,-...,„•:.-,•;.:•.2.•.C'...,:c7..,,:-:',:'•A.-.a, ::.,•;•,,,,::..F„-.1•;:-,-,..•-•. 7.7.1--?c•••••1V--,-:.:::•>-:31:4itr'..4.2,7,.:--:•:-?,,•:•••,--„,:..--,..,,,.: '-'-'''''''',•--.;:'-Y••-i•I'",;2•-•••!:,::?.-',.:::!,-.-7;•-:.'f.:.-::,-,:- - ' -..:'..--••'.f.:--.:.-•;"::,•;_:,71.-‘...,..--•.;-.;"'ffi:-.',--'''.5•:,.::-:-J'''"..'.--:':'',-',-.7...;-.,:".'.--•-•:••• -••••••••,-2.,-":7-!.'-,.•-• ;;:c:i.,:c.'..-t ..s.2.--.;:; ..__.....----,--. -,c,--,:-.----:-..-,....••77-':-.;f:-:.4-.2f2'!'-';':-.:•;TF".:, -If-...:',4---'7:!, ....-•••7•,.T...: • • ' .--'. -, -..,..••-•'•:- '•-•':':.• •":,-.-'-'••-•;".•:.-.-. .'•:•••::•-' '-..--;T:••-•,: -'•.-.5.7':•`':',":", __....______„..,-.7-7,---;--,f=.•';',•1-;:,7":::. '.-7:::;'-:.:".!Z,:7-:.,',.;• ',..'f--•!--"••-7:.•••7.',.;-:''''-',.....,.-4,;;;.,'•'J'•7'.','"-.7•••.,::.--%,..-F,1-2:::%:....;.'1::,.....i,.*-",.•• , .:.• . .._:. .. :., ...„..--f..•,•... - .-.! '-;".,.:%'•;.-..'•;.•:.••-::::-,,•',.,--=•.,.777--.;31.---;-...7,--:••:•i.--...-.'.•--...;••-a-;-:.:-.'..Y-.5.-.:-,•••••:•11.--:',•-7:-•,:--t.2•77,-A1-,:-,-;...-•,.:--.•77,•••„;•,,,-,•:,...a.„..:,.7.•_.„-•...-. .. - ,:e. :•'.--.=,:iit.'.1.7,-'-i.,..Q•,..-14?...,•-,:a,,,j.--,,,•.-...;'-:-.7-•-* . i .a,- . ..-: . ••.-,-,..;• -:,--.....,•. '-,r,:,,...'„*...,--,7•••:•••-.....7.-.....7---:::::,-..;•.•-•....,.- •"7,•.-f:•-::-:-.••••7-,-,:',•,-.••.',.....-„,: :-;:„.a.•.,:..:r.....422.-.•-•:,?.---....,-',...!:••!• -,,,,-•••---...., `7. ,,!:••••,•.;,.•••,1:-..."-7-T...,i,,,•i.a-,--..,... ,7f,'"af:•,.-„.••••••;.',...-,;;i„-,-,;-.i.,-7,:„-••,;.•••-_'•;•.',..','•.'-.•-. . ., ,... .. .. -;-,....:..,. ,•,,,....,,,,..,,,.,,,..,.,,,,,..„,,,,..,.„,...,,,...,a 7.._.,..„:..a.,,„,..,,..,„,,..,..c.-.:-.,.....„,-,,:•,,,.....,...,.-..,....,,.-...::,,,.-.J.7....-,::::-.;:::_,,:,••..”...:•'..:-:-•:- f-,-'.2,f';•,-1:-;.,-.-,;.,:....'•••:;.:-....1:-.";.:::',;,--'••••,,::::;,.2-.., .-.-.7;,..f.'.:S.'.-.'-'-ff',i•'.•."-:::::-..:,..',. -,•••zr,i,',-;._-;.•••,z..:.i.'",... ... ' - ' ' .:'. ... '7'''.7-'7''''''''';'••••:',-...'...:-.:'-•':'-'<2"• '.:,;.:'....:-.:-::••••'-'-..---r..-.;:.;::'.C.--''' :.7.-:'''...::-. .. .-.'-'..-,..--,---.•;:::-j:,',,"..:::::',--r.--!..,',.`/....‘;s.f.-c,;:.±,-.7.::.:-'_-,.:--:•;:,-f.,•:,:-, -,--...,-::-:,..--•,..."':'?„•:::,'..:::-'i,;,--,!.,":•'...::•-•.- -1.;.-T...,-/:-IT-L'''z':::::;,-'2::.::::--,:.• . .. . • •. •• .....--,- ....... •--•--...: .,...-. ,-... .--:.../..,-..-. -......i--..,--:.-.--,-.•.,...:..-f.F-.1.-.,!•,--.----'•.:;,..,..,„.•:4...p-,;(„;, ,,F-.•;=-1..:,;4.4 )ge:V. .1,-*=":7:'7".-..-.-4. ;-1.,. ,.•-••..t..Z.t.,- ',.(.1,.•,.'iti.,:-,,,,, ,•.--,ii--. .,,,ta V.- . • . .'' --•••••'• '-:'',.••••••'.:::•: -:--7-',..7,- ••••••••••'7,•‘-'-•-::::'•',•-:-.";•-i--:-.••"--•,,,&•ig,,7;!--i-,-;72..;-.41.-- .:',07.:iftir:1i-':::'A.!-7,-.....::)c' ,-``t•-''Ti , -"...7:,: -•-s.t1.5-i-,--47,...-'7:,-.7;1..c:r:--..--,,,,s'.-;:i,,-;,.4:•:,. ...3...•-•,.;.:,_,F,,,* *.i74,,Tele„-re;,, • :.,•-,_,-,.;, ...:-„, ,..,,.;,.131.,.,4,2,-,7,-,7-J.,::ti-7.-1;:--,2f;-,!''!--7.-----•:;-''• - `7.,,07-,,-.;.,-„,-.•-•-----,•;•",,,-,,,,', 1.,,,a.„----1_,,..,4-L2--'27,...••"ZigA,:44,-.-.-- t-44A4 -'•‘-4:-'`.5-Z4;',`- -17. -‘TsIY-?--,:',7,- -.:-.• ••,•.;-.•,'.,•.<",,',..-':'•••-•••‘' :.•••-`:-! -':z.''-',.7-.F,'-'!...•,:tt-Iltri•',.',,-,1n7.1` .•,--;-•---.7fa...i...,:-.;7:r..:•,--...,:ri..1,-..-:;••-:a;:-..i.:::',.-X,•?:2•••,.--'7-.•;i:,..a.-7,i7Civ...."•'-'-`,•-::•,•4;.7.A5.....',----t:.%:$•;-•7•1,4-Al.":":4-.•.`51,,,4"74.%.--zt,..m-f".LC.,,...??7:-..1.--,: l.,..."-:-.1 ,--;','..-•.,7-7r--:-.-;-.•:-.. .,.,....:-..-IF:.,..-,-,-,-...•••,•-•...........,:-.:c..,-,:,,..,-..-s_„,•-_,?•,...,-..„,•,..-.,:,.., ...•_:.... , .7...,,--".-•gy-r1....t:.,-: ,,q...3.$:%,,.•?!. .;,--,., ---j.,-,,rR.-zt-.,‘= ?,.,7-.-•-•-•‘:-.'?-.*•.,..-•=f,,.-.';•'.--....-.:.:-•.:':-...-,-.••--•:.--.;.!:-.--i..--,•-.....--.::-',..-..-•."-,-....-....-',,-.•:.•.•,,-•.-..- .--:: ,....,--;.--,..-..:2,,s,,•::-.--•-•.:,...'...,;.,..--,,,,, . 7',,,...,.'.' . . • .; • : . ' .. - '.•;:. - -.:. .., .-.. .'. .- .-.."•'.,- - ' ' ', - . . - • : • . •'.'-.-• .."••..- '••.., ... .-....-• , .''- . . . • • . • ..• ., . .. . . . . • • - • • •-• '.•:..- . *-.•, '••••••:•''• - • , . . ,. . . . . • . • • •- .. • . . . • •_ _ •. . .. . -. . - - ..,.. . . . . • .•- ' '.'",.-.,..„... . . .. . . • . . . . . , , . .. . . .. • . . •. .... • . • , . •. - . • ...••. ..• .. ' • • • •• • .:.,...... . -. . • • . , .-.. .. .. - • . . . . . . • • " • • .. . '• •-' • . .. . . . • . •'...--- • :.• . , • , • •• . - . • . . .• . : ". • .. -. ...,. • „• .., . • • .• . . . . . . . . .. . • • . . • . • .. . . . . •. :. . ...... ... , ,. ..,. .., ,. . s. . , . .