The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA68-446 ,..,• . , . / .-_ .. .._._, y , ._, 7....,- 9-v-, (2,, 7 ' NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING _ r /'‘ -r K RENTON CITY COUNCIL RENTON, WASHINGTON ,40 e--'1'zilL-) A PUBLIC_HEARING WILT, BE HELD BY THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL AT rrITS UTAR MPTTING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, ON- May 6, 1968. AT 8:00 P.M. TO CONSIDER A PETITION, " as amended for Rezone from GS-.1 to R-.2 on THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: • . LEGAL DESCRIPTION: • Lots 3 and 14, Block 1 , Shepard Heights Addition, according to the plat recorded . in Vol . 4.6 of. Plats, page 79 Records of King County, Washington. Also together, ', with that portion of the SW 4 of the SE 4 of Sec. .L , TWP 23 N, Range 5 E, W.M. , described as follows : Beginning at the South 4 corner of Sec. 4., TWP 23 N, Range 5 E, W.M. thence N 1° 16' 12."E 4.80' to the true point of beginning, thence continuing N 10 16' 12"E 150' thence S 87°59'43"E 149.00' thence S 1° 16' 12"W! 150' thence N 87`59'4.3% 11.49.00' ' to the true point of beginning. ' More generally known as : Property lying North of 12th Ave. N. between M Street and Sunset Blvd. . / 0 ‘ ANY AND. ALL PERSONS INTERESTED OR OBJECTING TO SAID Rezone ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON May 6, 1968 • ' in the Council Chambers AT 8:00 P.M. TO VOICE THEIR PROTEST OR OBJECTION TO SAME. HELMIE NELSON, CITY CT,F,RK DATE OF PUBLICATION: April 24, 1968 • CERTIFICATION I 1�1 e_t�rti ap b C. . A et-`'SL\-o-P\ HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 'THREE (3) COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME 1INI TIMEE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON TT11 PROPERTY ONE COPY POSTED AT THE CITY HALL DESCRIBED ABOVE AND _ .,T , RENTON ON �� .2 y . (176 g AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. e� ;., c.'- ` SIGNED. / - y1& I\TOE n(.i:T3,_.0 IN A.2,,D FOR '1 T S'1'rl`y'r.; F WA, INGT'CN., RESIDING AT RENTON, WASHINGTON f I',', 1. Affidavit of Publication . STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. COUNTY OF KING ;.c 1^,, ^n•i o "••t, P Ort or......••• being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that ....s.1-..Ui s the Cli i g.�' (.:3•• .r!e.. of ' • THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE,a semi-weekly newspaper.That '--- -1 said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for , more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, ' NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEAR.:•:G , printed and published in the English language continually as a semi- RENTON CITY COUNCI' weekly newspaper in Renton, King County,Washington,and it is now RENTON,WASHINGTON and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the A PUBLIC. HEARING "WILL BE aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper. That the Renton HELD BY THE RENTON CITY. Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order COUNCIL AT ITS REGULAR MEE.T-: , of the Superior Court of the County in which it is published,hed, to-wit, ING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS.,•,, King County, CITY HALL, RENTONl.ON:: May. 6, 1968.AT 8:00 P.M.TO CONSIDER At Washington.That the annexed is a Rezone from PETITION, as.amended* k .for Rezone '- � • from OS-1 to R-2 'Or' THE, FOLLOWING DESCRIBED'•PROPER- n:_ to ��-2 r,,>®� TY: , • LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 1 Lots 3 arid 4, Block 1; Shepard as it was published in regular issues (and I Heights Addition, a46.of P the; lat recorded in Vol.ol. 46.of Plats; not in supplement form of said newspaper)once each issue for a period i page 7 g Records King County;, Washington.Also togrether with that of Or E consecutive issues, commencing on the 'portionec.4, TWP 23 N,�Range�5''' W.M f described as follows: Beginning at _ ti �� ,the South 1/4 corner of�Sec�,tA, t day of ' pr .1. , 19 ._ and ending the 23 N, Range 5 E, W.M:t�hAe.ce N.1 degrees 16'12" E 480'to.tpe true contin- 'point of beginning, fheriee f 1 t,'.day of p.r� J.. 19.0:., both dates cuing N 1 degree 16'12"E, 150' e. inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its I thence S•-87 degrees, • 5943'E . subscribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee ' 149.00' thence S 1 degree 16'12'W' I,, 150' thence N 87 degrees 59'43"W, char d_for_the foregoing $ ° �"®g g publication is the sum of , which , hay been-paid"in full at the rate of$3.20 per folio of one hundred words 14g.00' to the true point of for ilt firs' i'i�sertIon and$2.40 per folio of one hundred words for each w „ beginning. j .54tse e t insertion. More�generally known,as: ! I :- ci lR r 047„.ffirt-,--e., �,, Property lying North of 12th ve.* N: between M Street and Sunsetti f? r, 6 ,�, Ivcl. ' `��- s L3ll �. s .ANY AND ALL PERSONS INTER - _A)� i Off', • 4 I ESTED OR OBJECTING TO SAID., • i• ` ca +,h i P j 1:.3 ,..rk Rezone ARE INVITEE) TO BE ' •,t 'PRESENT AT THE..RENTON CITY -,c i COUNCIL MEETING .'ON May; Subscribed and sworn to before me this 24.t11. day of 1968 'in the Council;'Ch'ambers,AiT .8:00 P:M. TO: • VOICE THBiR PROTEST DR OBJECTION T,O:SAME -HELMIE NELSON, ""1r 1_ 19.F1i City Clerk �_I �,7 Published in Re•• rtotd Chronicle Q lk/!NC/.-t---C-C- .r.4.�-C.�(..'J IlApril 24, 1968. _ _ .- Notary P• • in and for the State of Washington, • - — ding at Renton,King County. —Passed by the Legislature, 1955, known as Senate Bill 281, effective June 9th,1955. �-2_ —Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. • N 2, OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK • RENTON,WASHINGTON CITY HALL, CEDAR RIVER PARK, RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 • ALPINE 5-3464 Ap 9ysp ,a4 May /5', 19 ART CAPITh4 C) Mr. Bruce Mahler, Land & Tax Agent King County Assessor's Office County Court House, Room 201 Seattle, Washington 98104 Dear Sir: Enclosed is a certified copy of Ordinance No.2403 changing the zoning of certain properties within the City of Renton, as passed and approved on this 13th day of May 1968 _. Very truly yours, CITTY OF RENTON/' s^� �%C�%ram=�C�... • !,/x.'; �._ Helmie W. Nelson City Clerk HWN/h Enclosure (1) ;TATE OE WASHINGTON ;OUNTY OF KING Si Co-y.1 V �;:y Cler;; in and for <<ie City of Renton; ��e1 7 �ashin^ton, do he.oby cer'lSiy t'-,. , fmc nHd Ordinance is a true and correct opy of Ord'ri;,:,ce I`.c............. ... . . , .-. ,...:;;on, as it appears on file 7 — 1/ 4� 6 _ ‘ n my office, and do i�::.;.: :.: -• _ . , _ been publish d cccrdinc' EN L/dO. Slaw. .'� n Witness Moreof I have hcr:nn'o . i:znd• end affixed the seal of the ity of Renton,this AN__ORIZINANCE__OLTHE._.C1TY__QF RENTON, WASHINGTON, •CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM GENERAITSUBURBAN-DISTI b$ef(GS-1) TO RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (R-2). WHEREAS under Chapter VII, Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton", as amended, and the maps adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described.has heretofore been zoned as General Suburban District (GS-1); and WHEREAS. a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the City Clerk on or about February 8, 1968, which petition was duly referred' to the, Planning Commission for investigation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about March 27, 1968, which hearing was duly continued, and said matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission • and the Petitioner-Owner having duly amended his petition for rezoning, and said rezoning request, as amended, being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AS FOLLOWS: ' Section 1: The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Residential District (R-2); the City Engineer and the Planning Director are hereby authorized and directed to change.. the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Shepard Heights Addition, according. to .the plat recorded in Vol. 46 of Plats, page 79 Records of King County, Washington. Also together with that portion of the SW 1/4: of the SE is. of Sec. 4, I7P 23 N, Range 5 E, W.M. , described as follows: Beginning at the South % corner of Sec. 4, TWP 23 N, Range 5 E, W.M. thence N 1°16'12" E 480' to the true point of beginning, thence continuing N 1°16'12" E 15O'thence S 87°59'43" E 149.00' thence S 1°16'12" W 150' thence N 87°59'43" W 149.00'' to the true point of beginning. Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and legal publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 13th day of lviay, 1968.,• :•, A,-,,,,,N . co Helm' elson , . ty:;. ixrk: ' APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 13th day of May, 6 . {sri i"�a77 ( i� 454/71 Donald W. Custer, Mayor Approved as to form: • Gerard M. Shellan, City Attorney DA-1E. Uh NUbLiU lUi' MAY 1 5 1968 . % ff,r; 1k314-4-1`'-71' it/iy),-Pj „i),_ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING (1 RENTON CITY COUNCIL RENTON, WASHINGTON `O '67A PUBLIC HEARING WTT.T, BE HELD BY THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL AT ITS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, ON May 6, 1968. AT 8:00 P.M. TO CONSIDER A PETITION, .as amended for Rezone from GS-1 to R-2 on THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 3 and 4, Block I, Shepard Heights Addition, according to the plat recorded in Vol . 46 of Plats, page 79 Records of King County, Washington. Also together with that portion of the SW 4 of the SE 4 of Sec. 4, TWP 23 N, Range 5 E, W.M., described as follows: Beginning at the South 4 corner of Sec. 4, TWP 23 N, Range 5 E, W.M. thence N 1° 16' 12"E 480' to the true point of beginning, thence continuing N 1° 16' 12"E 150' thence S 87°59'43"E 149.00' thence S l° 16' 12"W 150' thence N 87659'43"W 149.001 to the true point of beginning. More generally known as : Property lying North of 12th Ave. N. between M Street and Sunset Blvd. ANY AND ALL PERSONS INTERESTED OR OBJECTING TO SAID Rezone ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON May 6, 1968 in the Council Chambers AT 8:00 P.M. TO VOICE THEIR PROTEST OR OBJECTION TO SAME. HELMIE NELSON, CITY CLERK DATE OF PUBLICATION: April 24, 1968 i CERTIFICATION I, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE (3) COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AND ONE COPY POSTED AT THE CITY HALL, RENTON ON AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. SIGNED: ATTEST: NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE Of WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT RENTON, WASHINGTON INTER-OFFICE MEMO` SATE; May 9, 1968 TO: Helmie Nelson, City Clerk IT FROM: Gerard M. Shellan, City Attorney • J � F 1 �� RE: Rezoning Dear Helmie: ✓Id We are enclosing herewith stencil for the proposed rezoning of Ray Brown 's property to Residential District (R-2). Would you please have the City Engineer and Planning Director check same over to be sure it is correct. We remain, • Very truly yours, —) if // GERARD M. SHELLAN„ CITY Attorney (CIS/aw enc. INTER-OFFICE MEMO DATE: TO: Helmie Nelson, City Clerk FROM: Jack Wilson, City Engineer RE: i9 t �� I hereby certify that the legal description contained in the attached of the 1 ' 2,21.:Lproperty is correct. Wilson, City Engineer 1 K11# . . 4.77 5-6-68 Minutes - Renton City Council Meeting (Cont.) PUBLIC HEARING: Reconsiderat=on of Ray Brown request for rezone amended to R-2 This being the date set, the hearing was declared open. There being no written com- munications nor audience remarks, it was moved by Perry, seconded by Barei, that the hearing be closed. The motion carried and the hearing was declared closed. Council action was invited and it was moved by Trimm, seconded by Grant, to approve the R-2 request with referral to the Law and Ordinance Committee for the necessary Ordinance . The motion carried. Inquiries from the audience followed regarding possible use under the R-2. Planning Director Ericksen read from the Code the use allowed and it was noted that in order to secure a special permit application would have to be filed with the Planning Commission followed by public notice and public hearing. It was urged that persons wishing to be advised of any public hearing which should result leave their names with the Planning Department. PUBLIC HEARING: Proposed L.I.D. 258, Kennydale area on Lake Wn. Blvd. ; S.E. 91st Place, SE 91st Street; S.E. 92nd Street and S.E. 93rd Street This being the date set, the hearing was declared open. Communication was read from J. R. Fawcett, 9003 - 100th Ave. S.E . , inquiring regarding 35% increase in cost over prior estimate and urging city participation, suggesting 60% since this is the addi- tional cost since the July, 1967 proposal which was lost due to protest. Mr. Fawcett had been instrumental in formation of the district and upon inquiry,it was noted that there was no -protest at this time and City Engineer Wilson displayed drawing of the proposed .line advising that the area was divided at the point where gravity flow runs to the North for connection and this is part of an over all system which could be pro- jected however since the last was defeated by protest it was felt a smaller unit as requested will be instituted at this time. It was noted that the increase in cost is mainly attributed to the smaller size of the district with fewer benefitting property owners sharing,and to the fact that the Lake Wn. Blvd. area requires 10" pipe and only one side of the street will be in the district,limiting the number participating. Mr. Jack Hodges inquired regarding reason his property was not included and was advised that his residence is beyond the division of the district since gravity flow to the connecting line would run to the South and this would involve another cost factor. Mr. Graham Bell commented that •his assessment was for two lots and his house extends onto the other lot and a second connection would be unnecessary. City Engineer Wilson advised that consideration is given if such is the event. Inquiry was made as to the possibility of cutting costs by elimination of manholes and City Engineer Wilson stated the State Law required manholes and this would be necessary whether the district were extended or not. It was noted that part of the area is railroad property and is not included in the benefitting properties. Upon inquiry it was noted that the total district will contain approximately 640 ft. of 10" line, 3200 of 8" line and-about 1100 of 6" line or about. 3850 main line and 1150 side sewers Mrs. Roberta Hodges in- quired regarding storm water run off and problems caused on their property. City Engineer Wilson suggested interceptor drains lead into the storm system as the ulti- mate answer but that no sanitary sewer system is under consideration at this time and would not be unless the whole area could be served. He stated that the Engineering Department along with the County Health Department have begun investigations of faults in septic tanks in the area which will be available at such time as another L.T.D. is commenced. Mayor Custer added this is the first effort of the Joint Agreement with King County Health and Sanitation Department and the Kennydale area will be the first work under this proposal. As there was no further comment, it was moved by Delaurenti, seconded by Perry, the. hearing be closed. Carried. Mr. Fawcett inquired regarding possible city participation in the present L.I.D. where the oversize pipe is required for future service and it was noted that this factor will be considered during the public hearing on the final assessment roll. Moved by Shane, seconded by Grant, to refer the matter to the Law and Ordinance Committee. Carried. Councilman Barei at this time moved that the City initiate annexation proceedings for Kennydale and Talbot Hill "Islands" and that the matter be placed on the Primary Election Ballot in September of this year. The motion was seconded by Perry. It was noted that petitions have been circulated in the Talbot Hill area and City Attorney Shellan advised that in such instance the City will have to pay the election cost and money will need to be appropriated. Schellert suggested alternate method by 10% petition of the owners, and not try to force the annexation since previous attempts with nearly 70% signers had resulted in failure. Barei felt that new residents might make the difference at this time. Edwards stated the people should be given an opportunity to petition. After discussion as to timeliness and order of business, question was called and vote was dissenting,resulting in request for roll call vote. The roll call: Aye: Delaurenti, Perry, Bruce, Grant and Barei. No: Garrett, Morris, Schellert, Trimm, Edwards, Maxin, and Shane. The motion lost as had been declared by the Chair. -2- 5-6-68 Minutes - Renton City Council Meeting (Cont.) PUBLIC HEARING: Reconsiderat on of Ray Brown request for rezone amended to R-2 This being the date set, the hearing was declared open. Therembeing no written com- munications nor audience remarks, it was moved by Perry, seconded by Barei, that the hearing be closed. The motion carried and the hearing was declared closed. Council action was invited and it was moved by Trimm, seconded by Grant, to approve the R-2 request with referral to the Law and Ordinance Committee for the necessary Ordinance . The motion carried. Inquiries from the audience followed regarding possible use under the R-2. Planning Director Ericksen read from the Code the use allowed and it was noted that in order to secure a special permit application would have to be filed with the Planning Commission followed by public notice and public hearing. It was urged that persons wishing to be advised of any public hearing which should result leave their names with the Planning Department. PUBLIC HEARING: Proposed L.I.D. 258, Kennydale area on Lake Wn. Blvd. ; S.E . 91st Place, SE 91st Street; S.E. 92nd Street and S.E . 93rd Street This being the date set, the hearing was declared open. Communication was read from J. R. Fawcett, 9003 - 100th Ave. S.E., inquiring regarding 35% increase in cost over prior estimate and urging city participation, suggesting 60% since this is the addi- tional cost since the July, 1967 proposal which was lost due to protest. Mr. Fawcett had been instrumental in formation of the district and upon inquiry,it was noted that there was no :protest at this time and City Engineer Wilson displayed drawing of the proposed line advising that the area was divided at the point where gravity flow runs to the North for connection and this is part of an over all system which could be pro- jected however since the last was defeated by protest it was felt a smaller unit as requested will be instituted at this time. It was noted that the increase in cost is mainly attributed to .the smaller size of the district with fewer benefitting property owners sharing,and to the fact that the Lake Wn. Blvd. area requires 10" pipe and only one side of the street will be in the district,limiting the number participating. Mr. Jack Hodges inquired regarding reason his property was not included and was advised that his residence is beyond the division of the district since gravity flow to the connecting line would run to the South and this would involve another cost factor. Mr. Graham Bell commented that his assessment was for two lots and his house extends onto the other lot and a second connection would be unnecessary. City Engineer Wilson advised that consideration is given if such is the event. Inquiry was made as to the possibility of cutting costs by elimination of manholes and City Engineer Wilson stated the State Law required manholes.-and this would be necessary whether the district were extended or not. It was noted that part of the area is railroad property and is not included in the benefitting properties. Upon inquiry it was noted that the total district will contain approximately 640 ft. of 10" line, 3200 of 8" line and about 1100 of 6" line or about, 3850 main line and 1150 side sewers Mrs. Roberta Hodges in- quired regarding storm water run off and problems caused on their property. City Engineer Wilson suggested interceptor drains lead into the storm system as the ulti- mate answer but that no sanitary sewer system is under consideration at this time and would not be unless the whole area could be served. He stated that the Engineering DeparLment along with the County Health Department have begun investigations of faults in septic tanks in the area which will be available at such time as another L.T.D. is commenced. Mayor Custer added this is the first effort of the Joint Agreement with King County Health and Sanitation Department and the Kennydale area will be the first work under this proposal. As there was no further comment, it was moved by Delaurenti, seconded by Perry, the hearing be closed. Carried. Mr. Fawcett inquired regarding possible city participation in the present L.I.D. where the oversize pipe is required for future service and it was noted that this factor will be considered during the public hearing on the final assessment roll. Moved by Shane, seconded by Grant, to refer the matter to the Law and Ordinance Committee. Carried. Councilman Barei at this time moved that the City initiate annexation proceedings for Kennydale and Talbot Hill "Islands" and that the matter be placed on the Primary Election Ballot in September of this year. The motion was seconded by Perry. It was noted that petitions have been circulated in the Talbot Hill area and City Attorney Shellan advised that in such instance the City will have to pay the election cost and money will need to be appropriated. Schellert suggested alternate method by 10% petition of the owners, and not try to force the annexation since previous attempts with nearly 70% signers had resulted in failure. Barei felt that new residents might make the difference at this time. Edwards stated the people should be given an opportunity to petition. After discussion as to timeliness and order of business, question was called and vote was dissenting,resulting in request for roll call vote. The roll call: Aye: Delaurenti, Perry, Bruce, Grant and Barei. No: Garrett, Morris, Schellert, Trimm, Edwards, Maxin, and Shane . The motion lost as had been declared by the Chair. -2- April 25, 1968 Re: Ray Brown Amended Rezone Application, R - 2 Dear Property Owner: The Renton City Council, at its regular meeting of April 22, 1968, has set May 6, 1968 at 8:00 p.m. in the Renton City Council Chambers, as the date for reconsidering Rezone Request of Mr. Ray Brown. All interested persons are invited to be present and to be heard on the matter. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON Helmie W. Nelson City Clerk . ^1N/ew V • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING. . RENTON CITY COUNCIL . RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WTTT, BE HELD BY THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL AT 'ITS.REGULAR HEFTING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, ON May 6, 1968. AT 8:00 P.N. TO CONSIDER A PETITION, ?-as amended for Rezone from GS-I to R-2 on THE FOLLOWING DESCRTRED PROPERTY: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: • Lots 3 and 4., Block I , Shepard Heights Addition, according to the plat recorded . ' in Vol . 46 of Plats, page 79 Records of King County, Washington. Also together; . ' ' with that portion of the SW 4 of the SE 4 of Sec. 4, TWP 23 N, .Range 5 E, W.M. , • described as follows: Beginning at the South * corner of Sec. 4., TWP 23 N, Range 5 E, W.M. thence N I° 16' I2.'E 480' to the true point of beginning, thence continuing N I° 16' 12"E 150' thence S 87°59'43"E 149.00' thence S 1° 16' I2"W 150' thence N 87°59'43"W 1)49.00' to the true point of beginning. More generally known as : Property lying North of 12th Ave. N.. between M Street and Sunset Blvd. • • ANY AND ALL PERSONS INTERESTED OR OBJECTING TO SAID Rezone ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON "May 6, 1968 in the Council Chambers AT 8:00 P.M. TO VOICE THEIR PROTEST OR OBJECTION • TO SAME. HELMIE NELSON, CITY CT FRK DATE OF PUBLICATION: April 24, 1968 CERTIFICATION • I, Te?1Gt ab C 1At,s&k HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE (3) COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY • AND- ONE COPY POSTED AT- ' CITY HALL DESCRIBED ABOVE�/ � $ -- , RENTON ON C�' '�' /6/6 6 AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. .l9 4y• � pa. SIGNED: �/' �k ATTESY: i- m . c WA 'IINGTON,. RESIDING AT RENNTON, WASHINGTON A pr ilt)2Tj., 1968 Renton City Council City Hall Renton, Washington re: Rezoning petition of Ray Brown approved at City Council meeting held May 6, 1968 Gentlemen: This is to confirm my request that the above rezone/Petition should be amended from R-3 to R-2. gyp//MTWK £, Very truly yours, Raymond Brown ) C ' I_s I z/,'/'7_5 -�-� , � 'y�/ � ss S . Q?c / 2?74 , ,/ / "-3-7 / - • /04 (-)-2__f 77 /A' 7-7677 '47 A ,2_.y�l ' , , ( `"_;71-P77 rWt0-777k • k &., 61, ;2.,,),: jui-e-yv y ar, CITY CLERK'S OFEICI: ROOM VA, CITY HALL RENTON, WASI•,li`�GiON t• April 25, 1968 Re: Ray Brown Amended Rezone Application, R - 2 Dear Property Owner: The Renton City Council, at its regular meeting of April 22, 1968, has set May 6, 1968 at 8:00 p.m. in the Renton City Council Chambers, as the date for reconsidering Rezone Request of Mr. Ray Brown. All interested persons are Invited to be present and to be heard on the matter. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON q_eawit Helmie W. Nelson City Clerk TANN/ew This letter has been sent to all petitioners, April 26 1968 (29) OC _ kV- 0 71% CI • „ CorLnCril O27 TZe-ra CITY CLBEat 0 RIM N,WASZ- NC/ ON • wear r`1", tt-k.., • CITY HALL, MVO RIVER PARK, NTON, WACHINGTON g8ca5 ALPINa 3,3464 c) April 16, 1968 .7cAmvx° 4fr6774/7:: --660 C i)\°•- /11/14(UP") Mr. Ray Brown 3113 Sunset Blvd. E. Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Ray Brown Appeal of Planning Commission R-3 Rezone Denial Dear Mr. Brown: The Renton City Council at its regular meeting of April 15, 1968 has denied your appeal for R-3 zoning on property north of 12th • Ave. North between "M" Street and Sunset Blvd, East. We attach hereto excerpt of minutes from the meeting for your further information. Very truly yours, CITY OF RENTON • Helmie W. Nelson City Clerk 2 8y Gwen Marshall Deputy City Clerk GM/sk cc : Planning Commission Enclosure ( I ) Copy ; /16. Aori1 ii, 1968 ...----77 ,....--- 6.1 iftrvc.)j Benton City Council City Hall Renton, ,,as ,^'toil P1'0t0:1 b ,c• a)-cal f r , . Plani-n,-: Coi - ui1i- -.:,ion ac')..:..Cndati0:1 of 'Zoning for ~)1 o', ,.,.'L-v reL,_ti-o'xc for ';-3 under tie name of '?a.y Brown , ren�-LcL1en: Jo „'1de-';;ip;neCi �1J_sh o 0 :4. ' rr,, au - 'O to st to ' , ? �fo--' oronnr't located ?Tort'l, of 12th the --•e'1c1_i..'�; rezone ^ ,-�-c�. _ _ � . e 1 5 t . ',. u o.=(',,' n O ?:no m 3 Avenue � n"{1�l '!:E'�i.'.J� eJ .LG "1 Ave . �' } 1 -St . ) ? rr 1, et al, A, - -L . !.o. ';1';��-'�8. -,� ,�i .;ur .,e L Diva. , n ea � _�._ oti�.r, . o ta':e ex.ce ,tica to Ur. Brovr, , :- conLonbi.on that i al-ca. aY .. :re feel I:-� ':ot�l,'. :=erzrc << << "flood buffer" for t'---.; c.a, (� that the - o 'cr i -no i- an effect ve divi.a i-, -- ' 1)(2 Jc�'n business r and r es-i_dcnul l areas . thatwould have ) ndvl:rse ' C`-'feet 11 We maintain ar. .�-3 J ,_ • z_ e andr.'1��- increase traffic . k: t -T; s inmle family a r_ a ;. on � � ex...^t�� , L'ie feel that Ur. Brown' s state::ient in bin ,, - -o al, about the traffic is contradictor?, as multi-famii-cr Jou:' l ';Wind further = • congest the area viith more vehicles . We also fool it is pre- mature i...- view of current uncertainty about t''xe Sunset Hi;hway ` ,, • access widening and from same. e fool teat a r.recedont has nlrendh bee ) established with an H-t-' Zon-'_n7 on a rortion of the 1-"anc--otv 1.n Cue -'tion, , eu •ro=''-- ;cl T ton 1,1nnths ago. We further :ai nta?n t':at , in view of e i2 ;:' ^? sin le fa:e l - res' deuces , the ,3 hir'h-density zonie ; IC incomratible . I Re_mectfully f'ubmitted, -7 ,9 - t/ / 0I., / �� 2. 1 v .-4 _ 4....., . .' 6 „„),4, iz `Z- ,/ stie,2e,va-se44,4,72„, .120% 1 a+4 Ave.N. (more) ' . L .__S. 'A_''‘L-4 ''(L P.4-4aAA- 1_1 / 6 5-?-z /4:1:- ,•-,7 4,4=b-li . 2/-3,--, _if/o ),-, ;it- CI, 1--ZA-0--'Ll --- /.3..i i e I .„5 / 0 ,c-7 ,3 7— rie,-4,..7-0 A., r _ , M, . -- , - huz-A-f Aft-,4-27 e. / ,2 2 2-22. jr/.4!/ /0W c9aiiie-8-r-o)27a12-4c,' ,ZZ264-efae, / • /0/u 'fr?-2 '.:it.9y-7ezei7-x-) izz /IT,T A,P4r/ko4, . ' ese7,--Le.-. c•-v:,.L.,, ''''''''', ):k4271-1,1-0-0-1---, ..' • / 2,,c) 1 /go 7 ti ti'cr . 711 '- - i a 3 4e - /67 _:7 Sr. Zola:14m i OZE,LL i.v,• /42s- )/ efid .AL • 6 6‘z-? . . _ • . /,2.4-2 --7,?.____t :. • ,..----) / -LzHp:p..___ . ,_,<..::: -:-,-;.-. /7 ,. J../. _, _ i( ii. 13,,-, ) , .15-1,41- / or,--74---;(--- r: /-, /bloc/- /1-Y J/ z- _ /./ / ' • /,)6 __,,m ,,,( 7. g-f.(we,--( i, . .-4 9)/ ? it\ _ 4 -.2-Y fil ,S4 • 02,.:: ,--2‘;- -- c---, LZ/- . ... _z4...), z. _zg 72 xf-Z , / f_zr-frz.). 2/44.,. rj..:1 I 3.4).1 AA 4 f j R --..21.7. it," 4,A.1 Yiettle hil 6 1 7, ,al foriiii/ • - COP ''7 ra,•;e 1 o:7 2 April 11, 1968 Renton City Council City Hall Renton, Wa s Igton RE: Protest to appeal from Planning Corn- mission recommendation of R-2 toning for property petitioned for R-3 under the name of Ray Brown Gentlemen: We, the undersigned, wish to affirm our protest to the -..-.ending rezone appeal for property located North of 12th Avenue North between 125th Ave . S.E. (comonnonl_y known 1 �as-j8• M-St . ) and Sunset Blvd. , Ray Brown et al, Apn1 . No. R- :le take exception to Mr. Brown's contention that R-3 would serve as a "good buffer" for this area, and we feel that the power line i,: an effect .ve division between business and residential areas. We maintain that an R-3 would have an adverse effect on the existing single family area, and would increase traffic.. We feel that Mr. Brown' s statement in his appeal, about the traffic is contradictory, as multi-family housing would further congest the area with more vehicles . We also feel it is pre- mature in view of current uncertainty about the Sunset Highway widening and access from same. We feel that a precedent has already been established with an R=2 zoning on a portion of the Property in clue:: tion, aun;roxii nately ten months ago.We further maintain that, in view of existing single far:�ilr residences , the R-3 high-density zoning is incompatible. Respectfully submitted, ,V 4044044- izos Aagiormia.d.44e/p4612) . .20Z 12, ,4Ve.1U. _ . (mnre) Tzigi?__Ap7-4 -.7r at - 07 1rre_07 '291n-/--„'• ...42. K-14.-vp,11 ( 4 vy i., 0-cr ' • (rP7CF 74V Pr ( ' •ru--q-v(P--1 ,/ (' ?ix- 2-z(, ,s,ze-/ ' ' •''772-17//7A/l- 2•P . LV 17ri - - ,t7.#‘6,,,,,, / )"„.,•77r • , / 4/ • -/-v if / •'/ '-'/,:-..._:„) ,,,„)- 4...„.„.e.??. /-5-- 1:4/ -/ /,(269/ _ • it ' . . . ,./ . IrV014: ir ), ./__.1, - • (51' C-- -,,. 1 47',. L .(,_7 /(ev . ('''467ple f bilariVg . k --ar-' /61 o'C7W -71777° F 'e-rFP. -, . _. 4.-- )716 iki 46ov ..?2i17-§ 'fi- 7 t / ( o/e/ • - - . /;- -1,7-P7,9-r-?-7w, 1{,(7--ig'2f, ,c lt? is ,* ._. g 60 7 va,, 'sr w 4-xzWirlis47, . 1 ry 0-4(li t S i'?/ e 7- • -• / 2-A-A/vp1-.467- i --..2,-----:-1----) - • -'7,,.-• (.ee., av-z-/ ;-- a -o-rr .0 -r-"shila..--v-2(,4 7 , 47 L < arn -s--..d..-*-1,/..,/,' 4 , -4-1-- (7r 1 . 41, 74-4, o / .:-.l t i . , . c it y (Se tAc- • df;" • Rento Plann-ing Commission • Meeting March 27, 1968 - - ---Agenda. • Page .2 • Staff Comments : Proposed development . is a continuation of Victoria Park Nos. 1 and 2 located southeasterly of-- Victoria. Park .No. 2. A total of 72 lots is proposed. Principal access. would be from Talbot Road', although an additional temporary access is .being proposed for the development to tie in with Victoria Park No. .7 and the crossing • • of the Benson Highway. • • • • Commission Comments : The single access at the. present time would. result in- the deadending of the development and could conceivably present problems. REZONE APPLICATIONS • • • lk (d) BROWN, RAY et al, Appl. No. R-446-68-, rezone from R-2- and GS-1 to R-3; property' located• north o . TE Ave. N. bettyeen- i25th Ave. S.E. and, Sunset -Blvd. Total Area---2 . 3 ac. • • Existing Zoning--R-2 and GS-1 Existing Use--single family residential Principal Access--M, St, • Proposed Use--medium density multi--family residential Comprehensive Plan--low density multi-family residential Staff `Comments : . Proposed. development for apartments would have significant impact on the adjacent residential area. The widening of. Sunse.t . Highway is presently - in, process by the- State. Highway • Department with preliminary surveys having been completed. . It • is anticipated that .acquisition of necessary. right of way will be completed this year, with .possible• construction being undertaken to a limited degree in 1969 .. A petition containing 29 signatures of residents in the area in opposition to the proposed rezone was received in the. Planning Department office. Commission Comments : . The proposed development, in view of 'the • widening of Sunset Highway- which is now in. •process, appears. to be premature., • (e) RICHARDS, EUGENE M. ,• Appl. No, ' R-449•-68 , rezone from G-6000 to L-l; property located, on 86 h Ave. S. between S. I53rd St. and • FAI 405; Total Area--6900 sq. ft. . . • Existing Zoning--G-6000 Existing Use-7single family residential . Principal Access--86th Ave. ..S, - Proposed Use--light industrial Comprehensive ,Plan--light industrial • Staff Comments : The- house located , at. the center• of .the. property has now beenacquired by. the applicant and will be incorporated • ' - into . the total development of this. and the adjacent property (the . • house has already been removed at. this time) - Mr. Richards has- been contacted and requested to meet with the department to review proposed restrictive covenants . Commission Comments : Suggested that- Commission. members consider possible M-P orwL-1 zoning with restrictive covenants . i MINUTES RENTON CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING April 15, 1968 Office of the City Clerk The regular meeting of the Renton City Council was called to order at 8:00 p.m. by D. W. Custer, Mayor, in the Council Chambers, City Hall, and the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was recited in unison by the assembly. ROLL CALL OF COUNCIL MEMBERS:, Schellert, Delaurenti, Perry, Trim, 'Edwards, Maxin, Bruce, Grant, Shane and Barei. Moved by Delaurenti, seconded by Maxin, that the absent Councilmen be excused. The motion carried. OFFICIALS AND DEPARTMENT HEADS PRESENT: Gwen Marshall, Deputy City Clerk, Dorothea Gossett, City Treasurer, G. M. Shellan, City Attorney, C. S. Williams, Chief. of Police, M. C. Walls, Fire-Chief, Jack Wilson, City Engineer, Vern Church, Purchasing Director, Gene doulon, Park Director, Sven Johnson, Building Director, Jack Jones, Library Director, Gordon Ericksen, . . Planning Director, Vic TeGantvoort, Street Commissioner, Ted Bennett, Utility Accountant, Jan Klippert, Administrative Asst. to the Mayor and Del Bennett, Traffic Engineer. Moved by Trimm, seconded by Perry, that the Minutes of the 1previous meeting of April 8th, be approved as written. The motion carried. . Mayor Custer announced that the City had submitted 31,371 persons for population census count and the State had allowedcrr:1y24,550. Written reply had been sent by Mayor Custer and an audience has been requested with Dr.. Slavin, Director of the new Planning and Community Affairs Agency, to discuss the matter further. Mayor Custer advised that he has received a copy of the proposed Initiative No. 244 which provides for earmarking two mills of State moneys from property taxes for County use which affects cities. The document is available if anyone might wish to look it over. PUBLIC HEARING: Ray Brown appeal of Planning Commission R-3 rezone denial. Property located north of 12th Avenue North be\tween 125th Avenue S.E'o. 'and Sunset. Mr. Ray Brown requested that the Council not act at this time but that the hearing be extended one week as he felt additional time was needed on the. matter. Moved by Bruce and seconded by Grant, that the delay be granted. Upon inquiry as to number of persons present just for this hearing, 16 persons were counted and in deference to the representation, the motion to continue the hearing failed. The hearing was declared open and communications were read including a petition signed .by ten businessmen in the immediate vicinity of the subject property who were for the proposed use which they felt was needed in the area; a petition of objection signed by 28 persons; and letter from the. Planning Director outlining Planning Commission actions and reasons for 1 denial which included that the zoning, in view of plans for widening of Sunset Highway, was premature; that, the rezone would be incompatible with the surrounding single family residen- tial area; increased traffic would have a detrimental effect and regard was also given to the considerable interest and objection of the residents of the neighborhood. ' The Commission recommended R-2 as the highest and best use for the property. Upon motion by Perry, seconded by Grant, which carried, slides were shown by Planning Director Ericksen showing access from Sunset Blvd. and from TTM" Street and various views of the property, the residences and the business in the area. Audience comment was invited and Mr. Ray Brown urged consideration of the R-3 zoning, noting that there are a total of 13 houses involved with 11 being on the far side of "M" Street and only two on the side of the property in question; that a portion of the property is already R-2 'and a part GS-1 but with a water tower and power line in the vicinity it was not felt thatR-1 would be a good use for the property. He noted various business and multiple residential uses in the area and stated than widening of Sunset would absorb additional traffic. Mr,. Eugene Methven, 1234 TtM" Street, Mr. and Mrs. George Johnson, 1222 "M" Street, Mrs. Dennis Vadney, 1210 "M" Street and Mrs. Dennis Ossenkopy 3208 - 12th Avenue North, spoke against the rezone noting possible tax increases, loss of privacy, additional traffic and access problems and that the power line is a very desirable buffer zone . Mr. Richard Stredicke, 3916 - 10th Ct. No. , Member of the Planning Commission, stated he had recommended that the portion already zoned R-2 remain the same and that the GS-1 be zoned R-1 as the highest use, which was voted. down.He recalled Planning Commission reasons for denial noting his primary reason being factor of Sunset being widened and proposed use being premature. Councilman Shane noted that when the property owner is ready to build than that is time for the development and he did not see how the time could be considered immature. (Cont. next page) r Minutes - Renton City Council Meeting 4-15-68 PUBLIC HEARING: Ray Brown Appeal of Planning Commission R-3 rezone denial (Cont.) (/ During discussion it was noted that 74 units are proposed and 109 parking spaces; and at the conclusion of audience comments, it was moved by Trimm, seconded .by Shane, that the hearing be closed. Carried. The hearing was declared closed and council action invited. Moved by Perry, seconded by Edwards, that the appeal be denied. Discussion ensued with regard to the fact that such denial could conclude further action for six months and upon suggestion that another zoning might be warranted, Attorney Shellan advised that the Council could not arbitrarily change the zoning without consent of petitioner to amend his application, but if he should consent, the Council may so amend and refer the matter back to the Planning Commission. Mr. Brown was asked if he would care to amend his (\\ petition and he stated three other parties were involved in the project and he would consuat them. Discussion ensued regarding prior appeals and revisions after which the pending motion was voted upon and carried, denying the appeal. Upon inquiry as to how soon the matter could come up again attention was called to the fact that reconsideration could be requested tonight or next week by a Council Member voting affirmatively to deny, otherwise there may be no further action taken until six months from this date . COMMUNICATIONS: Card from Mary Corbett acknowledged sympathy of the Mayor, City Treasurer, City Clerk, and the Council in family death. (Mother of. Councilman Schellert) Letter from Park Director Coulon submitted and recommended for payment, Progress Estimate No. 4, due Century Construction Company on the Grandstand Construction, $28,205.60, C.AG. 1220-67. Moved by Trimm, seconded by Schellert, to concur 'in the payment with referral to the Auditing and Accounting Committee . Carried. Letters and supporting documents from Johnston-Campanella, requested payment on Progress Estimates and service invoices for Absher Construction Company, Est. #9, $118,208 .32 on new city hall construction, C.AG. 1156-67; Chapman Electric, Est. 4, City Hall Electrical Contract,. $23,655.37, C.AG. 1158-67;McKinstry Company, Est. 4, City Hall Mechanical Contract, $75,554.13, C.AG. 1160-67; and Johnston, Campanella, Murakami & Co., Architectural services, Est. 21, $1,487.43. Moved by Trimm, seconded by Edwards, to concur in the pay- ments with referral to the Auditing and Accounting Committee . Carried. Applications were read requesting that Rainier Amusement Company be granted the required licensas to operate an additional Pinball Machine and coin-type pool table at Earlington Golf Course and three pinball machines at the Sahara Tavern. Moved by Delaurenti, and seconded by Perry, to refer the applications to the Police and License Committee with power to act. Carried. Letter from Gwen Marshall, Deputy City Clerk, recalled that $10,000.00 was placed into the Urban Arterial Fund in December, 1967 with additional moneys to be appropriated as payments were received from the State. $13,152.64 has been received and it is necessary at this time to appropriate from excess revenues in the Urban Arterial Fund into the Budget, Urban Arterial Fund. Account 1250/605, Structures and Improvements. Referral to the Law and Ordinance Committee for proper Resolution was recommended. Moved by Schellert, seconded by Shane, to concur in the recommendation. Carried. Letter from City Engineer Wilson reported recommendation that attached invoice due Lewis- Redford, Engineering Consultants, on services in connection with the North. 3rd Street North 4th Street project p:be.funded from the Urban Arterial Fund in sum of $10,859.87, be paid at this time. Moved by Delaurenti, seconded by Bruce, to concur with referral to the Auditing and Accounting Committee. Carried. Letter from City Engineer Wilson reported, regarding letter of intent to annex property to Renton in vicinity of South 122nd Street and Rainier Avenue, submitted by Peoples Bank, that 100% of the assessed valuation of the property is represented by the signature on the letter. The area comprises approximately 1.15 acres with assessed valuation of $350.00. Mr. Kenneth Burroughs, 2112 Wn. Building, Seattle, representing the property owners, upon inquiry indicated willingness to assume pro rata share of the City's pre-existing bonded indebtedness and acknowledged Council's intent to accept the portion of the Comprehensive Plan covering the subject area, shown as Commercial use. Moved by Schellert, seconded by Perry, to accept the annexation proposal and to authorize the property owner to circulate the proper petition indicating thereon debt acceptance and provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, as outlined above. The motion carried. -2- J Se 0 (� �/ ® �, PLANNING DEPARTMENT • RENTON,WASHINGTON `JI CITY HALL, RENTON , WASHINGTON 98055 • ALPINE 5 -3464 99y6:0 °9T CAPITP-° April 15 , 1968 The Honorable Donald W. Custer, Mayor Members of the City Council Renton, Washington Re: Ray Brown et al Rezone Appeal Appl. No. R-446-68 , rezone from R-2 and GS-1 to R-3 Property located north of 12th Avenue N. between M Street and Sunset Boulevard E. Gentlemen: The Planning Commission at its public hearing meeting of March 27 , 1968 , reviewed the rezone request of Mr. Ray Brown et al. The property in question has the following general characteristics : Total Area--2 . 3 ac. Existing Zoning--R-2 and GS-1 Existing Use--single family residential Principal Access--M St. Proposed Use--medium density multi-family residential, 74 apartment units with 109 parking spaces Comprehensive Plan--low to medium density multi-family residential The property in question fronts on M Street and is presently predominately built up as a single family residential area. The northerly portion of the property directly adjacent to the Sunset Highway was previously rezoned R-2 in June 1967 . At this time the property zoned R-2 has not been developed. The anticipated widening of the Sunset Highway will have some effect on the property in question since some additional right of way may be acquired. The preliminary surveys on the widening have been completed by the Highway Department with possible acquisition of right of way starting from the early fall of 1968 and bids for construction to be let in the fall of 1969. The amount of right of way to be ac- quired, however, is unknown at this time. The residents of the area submitted a petition containing 29 signatures in opposition to the proposed rezone at the time of the public hearing before the Planning Commission. e Mayor and City Council April 15 , 1968 Page 2 After considerable study of the area on the part of the Planning Commission and discussion with both the appli- cant and the residents of the area, the Planning Commis- sion denied the rezone request for the following reasons : 1. The proposed apartment development in this area is premature; the widening of Sunset Highway being a contributing factor; 2. The rezone request is incompatible with the surrounding area which is single family residential; 3. The increase in traffic as a result of apartment development would have detri- mental effects on the single family area; 4. The considerable interest and objections to the rezone as expressed by the presence of residents in the neighborhood at this hearing. The Planning Commission further recommended to the City Council that the highest and best use of the subject property be that allowed under the R-2 zone. Very truly yours , / ordon Y. ric se i�lannin irector ;Er -�-„--�� . — — , _ ice- 1.�_ 1 '!'a,os Csr .' 4 �J A4.', ID 0 2 Z 5 ---i r . 1_, —Wr — _ . . _ 1�T — Ii 11 '1-- e1-e 1 S [e ' -Jt=' ' • ,IAiG7EOO r, `e- •1, r 7 1 r-Y• "`A�^ '1 , y `''` s i��TY ,� 24e�- uf-�i . tis L08 • • 1\\t 1R—! ;iQ/ :1 24S i1: 1 : 20 {J\\v.�_/; ft\ ' 1' -.. R•3 ; R3 f • , / 1J L_: ° f •1 III .5 •� ' . �C1 _ _- -- t1" 1 �L 23C dtj J, �L '-, l$.:^v, r.4 /. �� P •- ••, ` NNit'lli4"...".' 1��' { �, e 4. 1 0.a 1 _i. i -1-----fif; 4 Nal iiii G 0 0. 4s i- ft R.. m„R-.-3 . ..,„ . ::,___01, Ai - , ir ,- ( = ,c, , to / '''.----,,,,, _ \ pip , ‘, i , 4. ,,,, .,-,, N, :,_ .. •6 0 . .1 0 • ✓I h, 01/._1 r.-, , ., , , ,1. R ,,, ......,.. ,,, ,. ,,, b - P • 1 e O _,.s '''' ;:'-'---..„1 ,,,,' --1. .•• i , ,, ei..:,.,t' .7_4, [;. ,r2.'-:":,p,' ';#1•,t,1 74.::11-70'7.t„.1;71-r;'-,\11, ', —L_If"_'4_ L_L: :.n T__ 1 1 " . ..„_ AVE 4.4 1 I 1 • ' I F• ..Y . P+l i 1 uW u�•� l L i • ,O AVE �j fir• '' _ c ._--•I P �, j3 32 I Ii e'i.��4 ''1''" } , ? • •IMF. f'.o .__'-.A..} '. ""T""m""t..' Tr ,z_f n i , .v •N � .r :f'i Ril n ►t�k :I° _ r ,u.' fµ • •�+� �, ' F.•. a� ..ice • 4 . t i F '/ -t . ;i k �.• ••f� •) ♦ -4 ta .',„ 's.,. 0 Pk; .t ,_•. p... 1 I„t 16 1 411.4 . Ave . -: 4 4;1 04. i---1 _ , .. ... . ,.., ,, 4..'., i • - • ii . ,,,• Nc_ T r-T .1 > •,•mom N ,u`. 'l•-��. • - z9,, r •'.. 17 I , • -, •-.v 4•Nw0 ,A • •Y' l wA14 f + • r`� u1 i.o1 1/4 ,1 y [L Rs 1 • . `" I- Inl"P'P..��.._1 ,�. t Iff ",ALL � �a V w .f . .r 4 •1. +.e,1.i T.t� .. t \,j 1 it- ( :. r• 1 ' '� '•• •r •r „ 7 ,i • ^ I 84,A: 4VE •.!`E t -It n{�`.�. •- ' o(u.0 o • - ,, ' t. ••J ' IS t¢A T T�if[�AfIN'• . ; 1, f r •� 3 �.r .„.tt romm • ipptt�� ...' k L,�•.�.• v,�.. ieatJf _ • �� .�• I I •�Y,ir+YY�Z^,.,». f.f` f�� I•I �_'_'�J'�'•rt�•.� ': . =-1, . . .,woaww. `'? '• �.zA+;t ' • e - • I I -- — . v� N , 1,— i.\�N• , • . O �:: , ,11 L I'La1.1, . iturifr.�we 4, 3 '� : 1. :y f . 3R-! i A ,-=. ,= . .4 , .. --,- -; . .:‘,„:,,, 4,, .= 19 i . ) I T n» • I e • • - \ ;� I � ? —' zo— � ,____L../.....if , P L_ I A F G I GS-1 -1 �' GREENWOODPr I, CE. ERY R-3 ' R-1 , •, , , / L-1 . , • JLc D ti • C.) 0* t(?-� , PLANNING DEPARTMENT • RENTON,WASHINGTON • ;" ; yam CITY HALL,. RENTON , WASHINGTON 98055 ® ALPINE 5 -3464 • 0 y9yd",.3 `of CAPITP April 15, 1968 The Honorable Donald W. Custer, Mayor Members of the City Council Renton, Washington Re: Ray Brown et al Rezone Appeal Appl. No. R-446-68 , rezone from R-2 and GS-1 to R-3 . Property located north of 12th Avenue N. between M Street and Sunset Boulevard E. Gentlemen: The Planning Commission at its public hearing meeting of March 27, 1968 , reviewed the rezone request of Mr. Ray Brown et al. The property in question has the following general characteristics : Total Area--2 . 3 ac. Existing Zoning--R-2 and GS-1 Existing Use--single family residential Principal Access--M St. Proposed Use--medium density multi-family residential, 74 apartment units with 109 parking spaces Comprehensive Plan--low to medium density multi-family residential ' The property in question fronts on M Street and is presently predominately built up as a single family residential area. The northerly .portion of the property directly adjacent to the Sunset Highway was previously rezoned R-2 in June 1967. At this time the property zoned R-2 has not been developed. The anticipated widening of the Sunset Highway will have some effect on the property in question since some additional right of way may be acquired. The preliminary surveys on the widening have been completed by the Highway Department with possible acquisition of right of way starting from the early fall of 1968 and bids for construction to be let in the fall of 1969. The amount of right of way to •be ac- quired, however, is unknown at this time. • The residents of the area submitted a petition containing 29 signatures in opposition to the proposed rezone at the time of the public hearing before the Planning Commission. • Mayor and City Council April 15 , 1968 Page 2 • After considerable study of the area on the part of the Planning Commission and discussion with both the appli- cant and the residents of the area, the Planning Commis- sion denied the rezone request for the following reasons : 1. The proposed apartment development in this area is premature; the widening of Sunset Highway being a contributing factor; 2. The rezone request is incompatible' with • - the surrounding area which is single family residential; 3. The increase in traffic as a result of apartment development would have detri- mental effects on the single family area; 4; The considerable interest and objections to the rezone as expressed by the presence of residents in the neighborhood at this hearing. The Planning Commission further recommended to the City Council that the highest and best use of the subject property be that allowed under the R-2 zone. Very truly yours , I/ -ordon Y. _,ric`sen Planning irector S /1-(0Ct 95262? - Renton City Council City Hall co * ‘-„,, \-) \*. •,-A c.A.) ,. Renton, Washington Co\ re: Appeal of Ray Brown from Planning -- a\- Commission for R-3 zoning 40 `I 4 ti Web Gentlemen: We the undersigned, who own property next to or near the property Brown seeks R-3 zoning for, or merchants in the immediate area, hereby lend our support to this petition because of the need for this type of zoning in -this area: NANE ADDRESS ..' , ...: -'•"4'"!i..---'-ad'.1 -- d. .a I v.r-tv-A 4,71;f-r--t-•"-:-. --7- ....,--• --••''.--I:--f---' .- ,7-1=5;aralaiiiigagga#41Elaaerlr.- -- -.• L 201- 2 ii 4/ 7 —/('--- /"— _ ., FC , , ?0"-„K ---/,0(-rs.,.(...-1_ Lig _- /L A / SO/d n/ /— 85-6 kt r - 02 L 0 c lc_ ,A....., .,.• ,tirr71/,, , k'eGi Pi/ / (1 4, Z", ".1 C,tt , /71 / ,zlire------gie..,,-__ 37,2 // 4,... 741i144 ., 4.3j, __/ AD e7 ,7-_5 ,5 „- Uet A9-6,e_ / ‹,e ,„1g)--6 •--- • / ..4,4, ...0.___ 4 ' ,•' ' - . • i f' -- . ,1 2,y ,14‘ ic-..4 -,,, 1f7 ? 1,r.q I . •••k..5L"'C'''L/4tS...Th l'IC, r‘ . Al PI N 1 U 1 , .., t • • lltk:._, . '' -, ,' .. .= : ,f page 1 of 2 yo �' April 11, 1968 Penton City Council City Hall Renton, Washington RE: Protest to appeal from Planning Com- mission recommendation of R-2 zoning for property petitioned for R-3 under the name of Ray Brown Gentlemen: tie, the undersigned wish to affirm our protest to , the pending rezone appeal for property ideated North of 12th Avenue North between 125th Ave . ".E. (comonnonly known as M-St . ) and Sunset. Blvd. , Ray Brown et al, Appl . No. R-4 6-68. We take exception to Yr. Broom t s contention that R-3 would serve as a "good buffer" for this area, and we feel that the power line is an effective division between business and residential areas . We maintain that an R-3 would have an adverse effect on the existing single family area, and would increase traffic. We feel that Mr. Brown.t s statement in his appeal, about the traffic is contradictory; as multi-family housing would further congest the area with more vehicles . We also feel it is pre- mature in view of 'current uncertainty about the Sunset Highway widening and access from same. We feel that a precedent has already been established with an- R;2 zoning on a portion of the property in question, approximately ten months ago. We further maintain that, in view of existing single family residences , the R-3 high-density zoning is incompatible . Respectfully submitted, W�j /.3 Jj, 7, , izoe �C os 12. Ave.M. . .,. • , . . .----,. page 2 of 2 )21, frRj,i),./;b4Z1_ ,_____ ._ • 6P...2 --- /31_81 -_Ix/ 7-0 Ai • -a-4---i ,v,-,_g__Z e c .,/ 2)/ -, - ._. - • ' - / 2 „.•,,0 . . A_,:t.k. ,../, • 5,..-V _ /., /. , ,*- si, / /22 411;-:."77. /70---4w-c,4, „ - . ‘11---- , ,-7,,./:-.7.__2-. ..:117 0_3____codcw)ct_ _j - TAL-Le4-t2 . ic2.3)/ al AI- .. • • .77-7i2. -„,i4__...,1 -."- — y--- - - .--- 2-" - ' - uo.g. - - . 9 7 7 walt, _. 4 .24 r Cl j4 , A,,,71,-v\--- . • .. . _. --- _,te,_,,Aw4,______ __'_2i,e4.,' Tell 1 Parki-.,/ i • e, Renton. Planning Commission Meeting March 27 , 1968 Minutes. Page 4 ACTION: . Moved by Racanello;. seconded by Ross, - that the Planning Commission approve' the final. plat of Victoria Park; No. 3. and forward this recommendation: to the City Council. Teegarden stated he. felt the developer: should request._a variance from .the, cul-de-sac requirements of .the Platting Ordinance, as ' the entire plat constitutes . a cul-de-sac with the , single'. access. The- Planning Director stated • it, was his- opinion a variance was• not, re- quired as this plat is a portion of the .over-all' development and quoted from Section 9-103 of the :Subdivision Ordinance which states, . "A final plat may be, presented for final approval- for any portion of a large subdivision when the•. proposed. plat therefor has previously received tentative 'approval .by the C.a y Council provided dedicated access is furnished' . . When the over-all development...is "completed, . the loop drive ,will ,no longer. constitute a cul-de-sac as other acces.s 'will -be provided. They pending motion to approve the final plat carried; Stredicke dissenting. • REZONE .APPLICATrONS (d) BROWN, RAY et al, Appl. No. R-446-68, rezone from R-2- and. - GS-1 to R-3; 'property located north 'of 12th• Ave. N. between 125th Ave.' S.E. and' Sunset Blvd. • The application ,was described by the Chairman. and the Planning Director pointed out the location, of . the property on the zoning map and described surrounding uses. He stated the . area is devel- • oped at,,the present time for single family residential:use. Slides - of -the property were shown,® The Chairman. read. a letter received in opposition to the., rezone` re- quest- signed by. 29.,residents of the area ' including a, note..attached which stated that these . signatures' represent all. the property owners on the block' s north side (across` from the, rezone request) plus two onc.the , same, side of the street as ,the subject' property: The Planning Director sta_ted. the applicant had submitted. a proposed development..,plan , showing 74 units with 109 parking • spaces. He stated further- that- the northerly portion of the .property was- rezoned: to R-2 by the Planning Commission ,,approximately nine months ago'. Discussion followed- concerning the number . of units that could . - be built on a' property of.. this size ,under its present zoning, under R-2 and under' R-3,. It was noted that several property owners are . involved, in• this :.application The Planning Director stated further that the widening of Sunset Highway..,is now in ,process by. the State .Highway Department. - Pre- liminary surveys have been completed ' by.. the Highway Department.. Acquisition .of additional. _right of way will' bestarted in the .,fall of 1968 with -bids for construction being' let during fall of 1969. The' widening will have some effect on the., property in-:question as , some, additional', right of way.,may be acquired; however, the State Highway Department„ is not; willing to commit itself on this at the , present time. . Comments from the audience were .invited. , Mr Eugene Methven,. . 1234 . M. Street, . spoke. in. opposition 'to the proposed rezone. ' He , stated he, opposed the 'Ray Beach' rezone, (property involved in this action which. is•.now zoned, R-2) and his- reasons of increased,. • Renton .Planning Commission Meeting March . 27, 1968 Minutes Page 5 traffic, loss of privacy, loss of view, ..plus possible increase in taxes apply .as ..well` in this case. Mr. :and Mrs, George Johnson,_of 1222 .M' Street, -Mr. Dennis Vadney of 1210 M Street, Mr. Chester Baze of 1216 M .Street, Mr. and Mrs.. John Walker of 1228 M. Street - all Spoke, in opposition ,to the proposed rezone citing the. same . reasons . as Mr. Methven (first speaker). . Mr. Ray Brown, the applicant, spoke,.on behalf of the rezone request. Upon inquiry by, the Commission, he stated that he, did not intend. to develop the- property . himself; that .the property owners' plans were indefinite in this respect. . The R-2 zone and the, intent and purpgse. of the special permit allow- . ing apartments in R-2 zone were explained to members .of the audience. by the Chairman. Ross asked .the applicant if he- would be willing to. accept R-2 zoning on the , property. Mr- . Brown replied he' was hoping to get, R-3 zoning so that the property could be utilized to its -fullest extent. Mr. Brown, stated . that the widening of Sunset Highway would take care of any additional traffic generated .by' an . apartment development _on the property. As there were no further- comments, it was- moved, by Sterling, seconded by Denzer, that the- hearing be closed. -. Motion carried unanimously. ACTION: , Sterling stated . he would move at this time that the application- of Ray Brown et al for R-3 zoning be denied for the following reasons: 1. The proposed apartment development in this. area is premature; the .widening of. Sunset Highway being a contributing factor; 2. : The rezone request_.is . incompatible with- the surround- ing area which is single family residential; 3. The increase . in traffic as a result of. apartment development, would have detrimental , effects on the , single family , area; 4 . The considerable interest and objections to the. , rezone:es expressed by the presence of residents . in.. the, rieighborhood at this hearing. Stredicke seconded this motion. On the motion, roll call vote was requested, ' with- Commissioners voting as follows : Denzer - no. Ross -. aye Forgaard - no Sterling - aye Mola - aye Stredicke. - aye.. Racanello - no Teegarden - aye Motion carried; rezone application denied. FURTHER- ACTION: Moved by' Stredicke, seconded by' Sterling, that the Planning Commis- sion recommend to. the City Council that the highest". use of the subject property would, be R-2 on that portion now zoned R-2 end R-1. • on that portionof the property now zoned GS-1. . The. motion lost. , Renton Planning Commission Meeting March. 27 , 1968 Minutes Paqe 6 Moved. by Racanello, seconded by Ross , that the Planning Commission . recommend to the City Council that the highest and best use of the subject property be R-2. Motion carried; Stredicke and Sterling dissenting. The Chairman advised the applicant of his right to appeal the decision of the Planning Commission to the City Council in writing within ten days. The meeting was recessed at 10 : 15 P .M. The Chairman reconvened the meeting at 10 : 25 P.M. On roll call, all members responded present. (e) RICHARDS, EUGENE M. , Appl. No. R-449--68 , rezone from G-6000 to L-1; property located on 86th Ave. S. between S. 153rd St. and FAI 405. The Chairman described the rezone application. The Planning Director stated this is the parcel of land that was in the center pf the pre- vious rezone request approved by the Commission. Slides of the prop- erty were shown. The applicant has been contacted but has not been, in touch with the Planning Department office up_ to this time. The Planning Director stated he believed the applicant was out of town on vacation, ACTION: Moved by Stredicke, seconded by Racanello, that the application be continued for 30 days. - Motion ,carried; Denzer dissenting. (f) HAWK, JAMES, Appl. No. R-451-68 , rezone from G to H-1; property located east side of 87th Ave? S. between S. 158th and 160th Sts . The Chairman described the rezone application; the Planning Director pointed out' location of the property on the zoning map. Slides of subject property were shown. The Planning Director stated that while the Comprehensive Plan indicates non-manufacturing use for this area, the applicant has requested H-1 zoning which would allow the fuel oil, storage use- he requires, which is a non,-manufacturing use. The Chairman stated he understood the applicant' s representative had a revised plan to present to the Commission- and called for comments from the audience. Mr. Walter Isaac, planning consultant from Seattle; speaking on be- half of the applicant, gave a presentation ,of the development plans for the fuel oil storage complex. Upon inquiry by the Commission, he stated his client would accept M-P zoning if he could be assured the desired use would be allowed in such zone. Teegarden stated he felt it was the opinion of the Commission that this development would be a good, and acceptable use for this particular area, but felt this question should be settled begore the hearing was closed. The Planning Director stated the proposed development, in his opinion, was in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and would be allowable in this particular location under M-P zoning if approved by the Planning Commission. Moved by Denzer, seconded by Forgaard, that the hearing be closed. Motion carried unanimously. ACTION: Moved, by Stredicke, seconded by Denzer, that the Planning Commission approve the application of James Hawk for M-P zoning (amended from H-1) and forward to the City Council for approval as it complies with the Comprehensive Plan. Motion carried unanimously. Gov `Z OFFICE OF TZ-LiB CITY CLERK. • margToN,WASHINGTON: �^a + CITY HALL, CEDAR RIVER PARK, RENTON, WASHINGTON 96O5 • A6,PIPi! 54464 umMO 'o �o k9A4.17 CAPITAL°�� April 2, 1968 f Re: Ray Brown` l_ Z-alf '-e Llc 77 lye Dear Property Owner: The Rentop ji ounei1, at its regular meeting of April 1 968, has set /1968 at 8:00 p.m. in the Renton City Council Chambers, as date for-littefi. the , glecivs/A?iei/Ne— 7 'e,ye t'egtlesr die /79? Q43UWA( All interested persons are invited to be present and to be heard on the matter . Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON 24,-L,-,, Helmie Ws- Nelson City Clerk HWN/sk r April 2, 1968 Re: Ray Brown Appeal of Planning Commission Rezone Denial Dear Property Owner: The Renton City Council, at its regular meeting of April 1, 1968, has set April 15, 1968 at 8:00 p.m. in the Renton City Council Chambers, as date for hearing on the above-captioned appeal. All interested persons are invited to be present and to be heard on the matter . Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON e,'"•22-) /Km /Z64"1/1 Helmie W. Nelson City Clerk HWN/sk 40 `� N 0 Uw OFFICE OF THE CITY CraEx • RENTON.WASHINGTON : a � CITY HALL, CEDAR RIVER PARK, RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 • ALPINE 5.3464 SA 44' Oh CAPITAV° April 2, 1968 Re: Ray Brown Appeal of Planning Commission Rezone Denial Dear Property Owner: The Renton City Council, at its regular meeting of April 1, 1968, has set April 15, 1968 at 8:00 p.m. in the Renton City Council Chambers, as date for hearing on the above-captioned appeal. All interested persons are invited to be present and to be heard on the matter . Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON 1-4 eUlej ;;;'-e /de)-21/1 Helmie W. Nelson City Clerk HWN/sk J 4Z jil/APLA)116 10 March 28, 1968 �� 0fit> Renton City Council �Q --- Ai, City Hall .••yEa� Renton, Washington ,,.,,Ge•(.� G •w y1• re: Appeal f o” arming Commission recommendation of R-2 zoning for property petitioned for R-3 under the name of Ray Brown Gentlemen: This appeal is presented to you for the reason that there exists many valid reasons for the change of this zoning to R-3. To start with, R-3 is in the comprehensive plan adopted by the City of Renton for this property. Further, on one side of all of this property would be business zoning, highway, or power line. The R-3 would serve as a good buffer to the single family dwellings in the area. Because of the high rate of traffic on the adjacent main highway, this property is not suitable for single family dwellings, and lends itself much more to the multiple dwelling. With the proximity to the shopping facilities, the heavy traffic pattern, and the general development in this area this property is highl suitable to R-3 zoning. And further, because of the high real estate taxes and land cost in this area, R-2 is not suitable, nor is it the highest and best use. Very truly yours, at uvl,\ Ray own --; q 0 iNk -) 4 ' 1 , 1 ' 1 . - . " k -)‹ `:. , , , ‘ \I A ' 0 j'-' \t ' ,), .:\‘' • ifl ,.\k' . IN 1: 0 \Slk %.. ' i \C4'i .\ 1 14: V1 Ray prawn ICM.#0 n G F-Arr V • C. ® �,`' gal �ha "ce5 March 16, 1968 (*lb' 0 4,01( The undersigned residents (property owners denoted by " " ) object to the proposed rezoning from R-2 & GS-1 to R-3 of the following Property at the general location "North of 12th Ave North between 125th Ave S .E and Sunset Blvd. " Lots 3 and. LL, Block 1 , Shepard Heights Addition, according to the plat recorded in Vol . 4.6 of Flats, Page 79, Records of King County, Washington; Together with all that portion of the W* of the SE?-- of Sec . L}_, Twp 23 N, R .SE, W.M. , lying Westerly of N Street , Southerly of Sunset Highway end Yortherly of _aid Shepard Heights Addition; ALSO together with all that portion of the SLR':. of the SE L of the SW-±- of said Sec . !;_ described as follows : Beginning at a point on t� e east line of said sub- d_vision 326.30 ' northerly from the SL corner thereof; thence continuing northerly along said easterly line a distance of 1a 3. -50 ' to a point 09. 90 ' northerly of said SE corner: thence north 88053' 08" West to the easterly margin of Puget Sound Power and Light Company' s transmission line right of way; thence southerly along said easterl-, margin to a point bearing north 88053 '08" West from the point of beginning; thence south 380s;3 '03" East to the point of beginning. 4e, request the above area remain as presenti zoned. Name Address .,-:; 1 - aeA,- 2-e___ /R c, 7— x ;- -1------ e.,,--, ,74- - ___e _J21 azi___-s - f9._0(7- ti. 5---A , -4,. 3 Att/ck44 i</ e).„frab,Lxv Y-Z-v P /-Z-L ,4-e, ..x) - , ':r LI-U lii c G ?U M'-�2�✓ e - OC J?{ _CA.. i • �'��. c�. . .41 __/ '7 E.. . -LET.'f /G/'.F _ t - --•_ _._—"'6/`o.„_.-. _'� .-. _, .e , _•a� Imo.._...-__-_... . : -a Name Address • -45 / / _ r,„„„,,_ a-_,.. ., ,_,,:,. ...,z,„__....„__, g--- 42_,.., ____2-", 174 • ,, „ 4 . - A ,_, . .... . -4a4&CJ-.-....*.....- .*-- • -. -Z. `13-^"`'''-2 - 7."6".Z l' '.- =V:, ? Af U 6 AA • 1 --- 4 / « A.'*. ....-... - '0" ' '"/ . ./7- 171 /",:,ZZL:' /14'/, , • . / .L_ , W6,74 ,4i,-2,-.62, -- ------1 iy- *- .$-:--'''f- ' ___ _ . • " „,-- i.---- :3..-.A. - .,a,e, it1) , 0e__,__eri, ..,PL, id . ' *2_3___4.0 6 A/_____f____:_•%/.__,}14.1_444-Pece., . _ _2_,.3 2. . )21 /...--- It I.3,/ ve-' • -24-, -_-- ' "-11,6t._..4 840410 - L2.0t ftit af44! i ... z>V Al 71--• • '1f --- -------- . . r•' (R EFC E://ED 4/i6 \ ''s\\ N. , MAR 20 1968 _,'G DEP t'• . APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONE IN THE CITY OF RENTON FOR OFFICE USE ONLY • Appl . No . L\‘kb-lq Plan . Com . Action . \)ein\Ca 11-611 Receipt No . ""( Appeal Filed Filing Date City Council Action Hearing Date . 3_2/_Gq Ordinance. No . & Date; APPLICANT TO ANSWER ALL THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS NEATLY AND ACCURATELY : Name ,f I a `�" �Z!� Address 3 l 13 +J Telephone No . g between petitioned for rezoning is located on' Property . ------ and th - S • Total square footage in property 96, 954 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AC. Legal Description attached Existing Zoning R-2 & GS-1 Zoning Requested R-3 What are the uses you propose to develop on this property? Apartments Number of permanent off-street parking spaces that will be provided on property? 109 Number required 74 NOTE TO APPLICANT : The following factors are considered in reclassifying property . Evidence or additional infor- mation you desire to submit to substantiate your, request may be attached to this sheet . (See Application Procedure ' sheet Item No . 2 for specific requirements) . 1 . In what way is this proposed change in zoning in the public interest? This zone change will help to consolidate a number of zoning boundaries and development patterns into a consolidated zone and due to the terrain will provide for the biggest and best use of the property. 2 . On what basis is there . a real need in this community for more zoning of the type. you request? The need is exhibited by the Apartment Occupancy within this area, the migration of people to this area, and the interest on the part of a reputable builder to develop apa.rtx.ents on this site. 3 . What provision will you make to protect adjacent and surrounding properties from the detrimental effects , of any uses permitted in the proposed zone? Due to the slope of the property from 'M' St. down to Sunset Highway, 3-story bidgs. can be constructed with a minimum of exposure to the dwelling units East of 'M' St. Ingress and egress can be controlled and vehicular manuvering accomplished on site. Landscaping and screen planting would be - in order to enhance its setting and blend with the adjoining properties. OF ReA, RECEIVED o (� Renton Planning Dept . FEB 8 1968 1967 ��/Nr' .- �oP\ Renton Planning Commission Meeting March 13, 1968 Minutes Page 2. 4. - NEW BUSINESS, The Planning Director stated that with the permission of theChair man he would, review briefly the following items of- new business. . The Chairman indicated that - these new items of business would, be' studied in detail by the Planning Commission on the field trip, the date of..which would be. set later during this- meeting. SITE PLAN APPROVAL APPLICATION (a) GRIFFIN HOME FOR BOYS , proposed addition; property located at 10198 Lake .Washington Blvd. Continuation of the, development pre- . viously reviewed by Planning Commission. FINAL -PLAT APPLICATION (b) VICTORIA PARK NO. 3, Appl. No. FP-450-68; property located south of 14th Ave. S.. , - north of SE. 166th St, and east of Talbot. Road . (72 lots) . REZONE APPLICATIONS L!..' 't (c) BROWN, . RAY et al, Appl. No. R-446-68 , rezone from R-2 and GS-1 to R-3; property- located north of 12th Ave.. No between 125th Ave. E. . and Sunset- Blvd. (d) RICHARDS, EUGENE M. , Appl. No. R-449-68, . rezone' from G-6000 to L-1; . property located on 86th Ave. S. between..S.- 153rd St. and FAI 405. . (e) HAWK, JAMES , App1.. No. . R-451-68 , rezone from G to H-1; property located east side of 87th Ave. S. between S. 158th and 160th Stso 5. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS ' (a) FIELD- TRIP. DATE ACTION: Moved by Ross, ; seconded, by' Forgaard, that the next field trip be. conducted on. Saturday, March 16 , 1968; Commissioners to leave- from the, Park Avenue Restaurant at 8: 00 A.M. Motion carried. (b) PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON MEETING, APRIL 5--6 , 1968 Chairman. Garrison announced that the spring meeting of. the Planning Association of Washington would be held in Wenatchee on April 5 and 6. He asked , if any members . felt .they' would be able to attend. . Denzer and Stredicke stated they wished to, attend. The Chairman stated this ..was a,. very..worthwhile meeting and - urged a good attend- ance from the- Planning Commissions. ACTION: Moved by Teegarden., seconded by, Ross, that- James Denzer and Richard Stredicke be authorized to. attend the PAW meeting in Wenatchee on . April, 5 and 6 , 1968. . The Planning Director stated that staff' members will attend and that- a car -pool- could be worked out The pending motion carried unanimously. • RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE MEETING MARCH 13 , 1968 .A G E N D A 1. ROLL CALL • 2 . APPROVAL OF MINUTES , MEETING FEBRUARY 28 , 1968 3. BUSINESS CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS MEETING: • • FINAL PLAT APPLICATION (a). FINAL PLAT 'OF GLENCOE, Appl. No. FP-443-68; property located NE corner S .E. 107th St. and 132nd Ave. S. E. (continued from meeting of February 28 , 1968) Total Area--28 . 7 ac. (115 lots) Existing Zoning--G-7200 Existing Use--undeveloped Principal Access--132nd Ave. S.E. Proposed Use--single family residential Comprehensive Plan--single family residential 4. NEW BUSINESS : SITE PLAN APPROVAL APPLICATION (a) GRIFFIN HOME FOR BOYS , proposed addition; property located at 10198 Lake Washington .Blvd. Continuation of development previously reviewedby Planning Commission FINAL PLAT APPLICATION (b) VICTORIA PARK NO.. 3, Appl. No. FP-450-68; property located south of 14th Ave. S. north of S.E. 166th St. and east of Talbot Rd. Total- Area--20 ac. (72 lots) Existing Zoning--SR-1 • Existing Use--undeveloped Principal Access--Talbot Rd. Proposed Use--single family residential Comprehensive Plan--single family residential - REZONE APPLICATIONS (c) BROWN, RAY ;et al, Appl. No. R-446-68 , rezone from R-2 and GS-1 to R-3; property located north of 12th Ave. N. between 125th Ave. S.E. and Sunset Blvd. Total Area--2. 3 ac. Existing Zoning--R-2 and GS-1 • Existing Use--single family residential Principal Access--M St. Proposed Use--medium density multi-family residential Comprehensive Plan--low density multi-family residential (d) RICHARDS , EUGENE M. , Appl. No. R-449-68 , rezone from G-6000 to L-l; property located on 86th Ave. S. between • S. 153rd St. and FAI 405 Total Area--6900 sq. ft. Existing Zoning--G-6000 Existing Use--single family residential Principal Access--86th Ave. S. Proposed Use--light industrial Comprehensive Plan--light industrial • • • Lots 3 and '4 , Block 1, Shepard Heights Addition, according to the plat recorded in Vol. 46 of Plats, page 79 , Records • of King County, Washington: . Together with all that portion of the SW 1/4 of . the SE 1/4 of Sec. 4 , Twp 23NW, R 5E, W.M. , lying westerly of "M" St. , , southerly of Sunset Highway, and northerly of said Shepard. Heights Addition: ALSO together with all that portion of the SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of said Sec. 4 described as follows : Beginning at a point on the east line of said subdivision 326. 30 ' northerly from the SE corner thereof; thence continuing northerly along said easterly line a distance of 163. 60 ' to a point 489 . 90 ' northerly of said SE corner; thence north 88°53 ' 08" West to the easterly margin of Puget Sound Power & Light Company' s transmission line right of way; thence southerly along • . said easterly margin to a point bearing north 88°53 ' 08" West from the point of beginning; thence south 88°53 ' 08" East to the point of beginning. r. q` a' LEGAL DESCRIPTION For Rezoning Purposes Lots 3 & ' Block 1, Shepard Heights Addition recorded in Volume 46 of plats, page 79, ing County, Washington plus that portion of Parcel A described below lying t asterly of the Puget Sound Power and Light Company R/W easement. Parcel A. A part of the 1/4, SE 1/4, SW 1/4, Section 4, T 23 N, R 5 E, W. M. ; King County, Was 'ngton, described as follows: Commencing at the S 1/4 corner of said Section 4; thence along the easterly line of said subdivision, N 1° 1. ' 12" E, 326. 30 feet to the point of beginning and proceeding thence N 88° 53 08" W, 258. 97 feet to the Southeasterly margin of the Sunset Highway; th- ce along said Southeasterly margin N 35° 44' 50" E, 396. 71 feet; thence S 88° 8' 19" E., 34. 41 feet to the Northeast corner of said subdivision; thence al. g said easterly line of said subdivision S 1° 16' 12" W, 326. 30 feet to the poi t of beginning, EXCEPT: Beginning on the easterly line of said subdivisio at a point 549. 90 feet Northerly of the Southeast corner thereof; thence N 88° 5 ' 08" W to the Southeasterly margin of the Sunset Highway.; thence N 35° 44' 50 ' E along said Southeasterly margin to the Northerly line of said subdivision;\'thence along said Northerly line S 88° 48' 19" E,, 34. 41 feet to the Northeast orner of said subdivision; thence along the Easterly line of said subdivision S 1° 16' 12" W, 102. 70 feet to the point of beginning and EXCEPT: Commen 'ng at the S 1/4 corner of said section 4; thence along the Easterly line of said subdivision N 1° 16' 12" E, 489. 90 feet to the point of beginning and proceeding thence N 88° 53' 08" W , 138 feet more or less to the Sniithpa At..r1V ma rrrin r' Page Two Legal Description Shepard Heights Addition Parcel A (continued) of Sunset Highway; thence along said Southeasterly margin N35°44'50"E. , 75 feet, more or less; thence S 88° 53' 08" E. , 97 feet, more or less, to the Easterl line of said subdivision; thence along said Easterly line S 1° 16' 12" , 60 feet to the point of beginning, PLUS that portion of Lot 1, Block 1, a\deleted from the plat of "Shepart Heights Addition" described as follows,_ Beginning at the S 1/4 corner of Section 4, T 23 N, R 5 E, W. M. ; thence 1 .,1° 16' 12" E. , 701. 60 feet to the Southerly margin of Sunset Highway; thence \N 35° 47' 12" E. . along said Southerly margin 10 feet; thence S 84° 02' 33" . , 69. 06 feet to the true point of beginning, thence continuing SL84.4'02' 33" E , 74. 75 feet to the Westerly margin of 'M' Place; thence Southerly along said Westerly margin of 'M' Place 70 feet; ti thence N 87° 59' 43"W.74. 50 feet; thence N 1° 16' 12" E, 75. 15 feet to the true point of beginning. C-2 - That portion of Lot 1, Block 1, as deleted from the plat of "Shepard Heights Addition" described as follows: Beginning at the S 1/4 corner of Section 4, T 23 N, R 5 E;‘4 W.M. ; thence N 1° 16' 12" E, . 701. 60 feet to the Southerly margin of Sunset Highway and the true point of beginning; thence N 35° 47' 12" E along said Southerly margin 10 feet; thence S 84° 02' 33" E, 69. 06 feet; thence S 1° 16' 12" W, 75. 1`5 feet; thence N 87° 59' 43" W, 74. 50 feet; thence N 1° 16' 12" E, 71. 60\feet to the true point of beginning. A - -That portion of Lot 1, Block 1, as deleted from the plat of "Shepard Heights Addition" described as follows: Beginning at the S 1/4 _�, Page Three Legal Description Shepard Heights Addition corner of Section 4, T 23 N, R 5 E, W. M. ; thence N 1° 16' 12" E, 701. 60 feet to an intersection with the Southeasterly margin of Sunset Highway; thence along said margi N 35° 47' 12" E, 90 feet to the true point of beginning; thence, continuing along said margin N 35° 47' 12" E, 27. 13 feet to a point of curve; thence along the a of a curve to the right, having a radius of 543. 69 feet, an arc distance of 102. 6 \feet to a point of compound curve; thence, along the arc of a curve to the rl ht having a radius of 10 feet, an arc distance of 23. 51 feet to the West margin\of 'M' Place; thence along said margin S 10 16' 12" W, 121. 32 feet; then\e N 72° 57' 42" W, 101. 82 feet to the true point of beginning. B - - That portio of Lot 1, Block 1, as deleted from the plat of "Shepard Heights Addition" descr>lRed as follows: Beginning at the \, \. S 1/4 corner of Section 4, T 23 N, R 5 E, WM. ; thence N 1° 16' 12" E, 701. 60 feet to an intersection with the Southeasterly margin of Sunset Highway; thence along the said margin N 35° 47' 12" E, 10 \ .t to the true point of beginning; thence along said margin N 35° 47' 12" E, 8 \feet; thence S 72° 57' 42" E, 101. 82 feet to the West margin of 'M' Pla ; thence along said margin S 1° 16' 12" W, 50 feet; thence N 84° 02' 33" W,\1413. 81 feet to the true point of beginning; PLUS the N 150 feet of the S 630 feet o \the W 149 feet of SW 1/4 of SE 1/4, Section 4, T 23 N, R 5 E, W. M. , King County, Washington. \ h , FFIDAVIT• • I, ( -,) 2,, being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information - herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge ar}d belief. Subscribed and sworn before me • this 'J ? day of , 1 • Notary Public in and for the State • of Washington, residing at• • am - (Si .nature' of Owner ) e) '(Signature' 0 ) ;'`;9 ( ddx° s) (Mailing Address Rn: * . • • �KEG '+l �cC` • ' . • • 3 t '• �'` (City) (Sta`te) • (Telephone) (OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION • This is to certify tha the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been f topit, thorough and complete in every particular and to conform 4t d regulations of the Renton Planning Department gov T ( E6i of such application- Date received FEB 8 1968 19 BY; \IN • 4/4//NG D EP A -�C� Renton Planning Dept. AFFIDAVIT • • I, )CL%4� d--19_,O-cAAA-A being duly sworn, declare that I am the YVfowneof the property involved in this application and that the • foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information - herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the' best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me • • this 7 7 day of hip[rik.kw 1“-2 I • Notary Public in and for the State • of Washington, residing at � - (Name) - (Sign ture of Owner) JAdc,a es,$) (Mailing Address) • • s u (City) (State) Jt;` g ti vvoks\N\ •~ , • / w- • - (Telephone) (OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify th the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been f AlttR thorough and complete in every particular and to conform u t d regulations of the Renton Planning Department gov �E�Si of such application.. • Date received FEB 8 1968 L 19 BY: ' • � . • • Renton Planning Dept. • boar Mmrnl-‘ 1 06.7 ��. d L AFFIDAVIT • I, Ay/v(o /34-- c../7 being duly sworn, declare that I am ae Owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information - herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this e day of 19 6 Notary Public in and for the e of shi gton residing at /X)U • • zi20)7(-412 /:".- -e-et-dA/ Name) ignatute of Owner) m V— , • 4mal/R(Pame%/jD/.7.///tl.•i ivt /�, / o)3 7 /`�2' �.l / n,.��',..., u�/hl./1JYn�L/ L/f�f�io i!9 Ii7��la7l!/ ii�c��...� —I--�culr /r / Address) (Mailing Address) • C•,A�. g//r, 11 r JAR - (City)- (State) � • AL (Telephone) • (OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been tube thorough and complete in every particular and to conform cQEhe and regulations of the Renton Planning Department go kninicr IwV shing of such application. PEITEb Date receiv d , 19 BY: \\h • • /YANG DEPP'� • Renton Planning Dept. Raxr_ Marnh 1 UF,7 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION RENTON, WASHINGTON • A PfJBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELP BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION AT ITS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON MARCH 27 , 19 68 , AT 8 : 00 P .M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : • latrow� *1. REZONE FROM R-. &CGS-1 TO R-3; property lying north of 12th Ave. N. . between 1 5t vo S \.. & Sunset Blvd. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 3 and 4., Block 1, Shepard Heights Addition, according to the plat recorded in Vol. 46 of Plats, page 79 , Records of King' County, Washington: Together with all that portion of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4. of Sec. 4 , Twp . lying westerly of "M" St. , . southerly of Sunset Highway, and northerly of said Shepard- Heights Addition: ALSO together with all that portion of the SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of said Sec. 4 described as follows : Beginning at a . point on the east -line of said subdivision 326. 30 ' northerly • from the SE corner thereof; thence continuing northerly along said easterly line a distance of 163. 60 ' to a point 489 . 90 ' northerly of said SE corner; thence north 88°53 ' 08" West to the easterly margin of Puget Sound Power & Light Company' s transmission line right of way; thence southerly along said easterly margin to a point bearing north 88°53 ' 08" - West from the point of beginning; thence south 88°53 ' 08" . East to the point of beginning, 2. REZONE -FROM .G.- 60OO TO L-1; property located on 26th Ave. S. between S. .153rd St. and FAI 405. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: * That portion of Lots 34 & 35, Block 30, C.D. Hillman' s Earlington Gardens Add' n to City of Seattle, • Div. No. 1, as per plat recorded in Vol. 17 of Plats, page 74 , in King • County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the SE corner of said Lot 34 and running thence west along the south line of lot 34 , a distance of 115 ' ; thence north parallel to the east lines of said Lots. 34 & 35 a distance of 60 ' ; thence east parallel to the south line of said Lot 35 a distance of 115 ' to the east line of said Lot 35; thence south along the east lines of said Lots 34 & 35 a distance of 60 ' to the place of beginning. 3 . REZONE FROM G TO H-1; property located east side of 87th Ave. S. between S. 158th & 160th Sts. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL A: Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, and 28 in Block 2 of C:D.•Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle_Division No. • 1, as per pit recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, on page 74, records of King County; P\RCEL B: Lots 27 and 28 in Block 1 of C.D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition to the • City of Seattle -Division No. 1, as per plat recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, on . page 74, records of King County; AND • • • Lots 8, 9.., 10,, 11, .12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 and 21 in Block • • 2 of C.D. Hillman's Earlington Garden Addition to the City of Seattle Division No. 1, as per plat recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, on page 74, records of King County; • PARCEL C: . • • Lots 1., 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12,E 13, 14, 15,-16-,. 17, 18,: 1.9., • 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, ?_5, 26, 27, and 28 in Block 3 of C.D. Hillman's Earl- ington Garden Addition to the City of Seattle, Division No. 1, as per plat recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, on page 74, records of King County; ALL situated.i n the City of Renton, County of King, State of.Washington. ALL PERSONS INTERESTED OR OBJECTING TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE . PRESENT AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ON MARCH 27 ; 1968 AT 8 : 00 P .M. TO VOICE THEIR PROTESTS OR OBJECTIONS TO SAME . JAMES E. DENZER , SECRETARY PUBLISHED March 17, 1968 RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION • CERTIFICATION I, James L. Magstadt , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW . i� ATTEST ; Subscribed and sworn SIGNED to before me, a Notary Public, / , on the, 15thday o.f March � 196 ^ �v k3