Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTR_Arborist_Report_221122_v1Bay West Development ● 800 Garden Mixed-Use Project ● Tree Inventory and Assessment May 9, 2022 ● Page 1 Urban Forestry Services | Bartlett Consulting ● A Division of The F. A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company 15119 McLean Road, Mount Vernon, WA ●1(360)399-1377 ● www.bartlett.com Title: 800 Garden Mixed-Use Project Tree Inventory and Assessment 800 Garden Avenue North, Renton, Washington Prepared for: Bay West Development Attn: Bryon Wolf 1725 S. Bascom Avenue, Suite 203 Campbell, California 95008 Prepared by: Urban Forestry Services | Bartlett Consulting Paul Hans Thompson, Managing Consultant ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist®, RCA No.509 ISA Certified Arborist®, No.PN-1838A ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified Reviewed by: Tyler Holladay, Consultant Date: Contents: March 11, 2021 (Updated Nov 22, 2022) Summary Introduction Findings Recommendations Literature Cited Tree Assessment Site Plan Tree Assessment Matrix (Tabulated & Image Based) General Terms of Commercial Consulting Services Tree Retention Worksheet (Includes Minimum Tree Density Calculation) Other Supporting Documentation Bay West Development ● 800 Garden Mixed-Use Project ● Tree Inventory and Assessment Nov 22, 2022 ● Page 2 Urban Forestry Services | Bartlett Consulting ● A Division of The F. A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company 15119 McLean Road, Mount Vernon, WA ●1(360)399-1377 ● www.bartlett.com Summary Through an inventory and assessment of eighty-three (83) trees growing on the 11.52-acre parcel (No. 082305-9217) known as the 800 Garden Mixed-Use Project site at 800 Garden Avenue North, in Renton, Washington, I found the following: 1.None of the eighty-three (83) trees are Landmark Trees as defined in the City of Renton Municipal Code. 2.This project is in the City of Renton, Renton Urban Center (UC-2 zoning.) The project property is within the UC-2 zone that has a 10% tree minimum retention requirement contained in the City of Renton 4-4-130 Tree Retention and Land Clearing Regulations: H.Performance Standards for Land Development/Building Permits: 1. Protected Trees – Retention Required. a. Percentage of Tree Retention Based on Zones. iii. All Other Zones: “At least ten percent (10%) of the significant trees shall be considered protected and retained in commercial or industrial development”; and1 3.No tree retention is planned for this project. Therefore, tree replacement is required for the minimum tree retention requirement. A total of twelve (12) trees, with a minimum caliper of 2-inches, shall be planted to comply with the tree retention requirement. The calculation for this requirement is provided in the enclosed City of Renton, Tree Retention Worksheet. 4.Based on a site survey produced by KPFF Consulting Engineers, none of the trees on this site are located within the public right-of-way (ROW.) However, thirty-two (32) trees are within a ROW dedication. According to City of Renton 4-4-130 Tree Retention and Land Clearing Regulations: H. Performance Standards for Land Development/Building Permits: 1. Protected Trees – Retention Required. a. Percentage of Tree Retention Based on Zones: “Trees within critical areas and proposed rights-of-way shall not contribute to the number of significant trees required to be retained.” 5.Per the city dedicated right-of-way (ROW) and ROW street cross-section it is assumed that all existing trees within the dedicated ROW shall be removed. New street/public trees will be planted as per the landscape plans prepared by others. 6.The location of this site within a UC-2 zone excludes it from any minimum tree density requirements. As per RMC 4-11-130 H.C.9.d; Minimum Tree Density. 7.A Land Development Permit (Defined in RMC 4-11-120, Definitions L) is required to remove trees on this site. No tree removal is permitted prior to obtaining this permit from the City of Renton. 8.A Tree Retention Plan is not provided because this project does not intend to retain trees, but replace trees through a significant tree planting plan that is a part of the project landscape design. 1 This requirement was confirmed with the City of Renton on March 22, 2022. Bay West Development ● 800 Garden Mixed-Use Project ● Tree Inventory and Assessment Nov 22, 2022 ● Page 3 Introduction At the request Byron Wolf of the Bay West Development, I completed an inventory and assessment of eighty-three (83) trees at the 800 Garden Mixed-Use Project site at 800 Garden Avenue North, in Renton, Washington on January 26, 2021. This planned project consists of a proposal to re-develop Parcel No. 082305-9217; 11.52-acre property currently zoned as Urban Center – 2 (UC-2). The redevelopment plan includes the construction of three (3) mixed-use residential buildings. These buildings shall contain approximately 1,179-units. Including, vehicular parking (residential and commercial), residential amenities, and retail space. The existing one-story retail building and surface parking are planned for demolition. Currently, the design proposal prepared by Bay West Development and Carrier Johnson +Culture does not include tree retention on this project site. Urban Forestry Services | Bartlett Consulting ● A Division of The F. A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company 15119 McLean Road, Mount Vernon, WA ●1(360)399-1377 ● www.bartlett.com Photo 1. This aerial photo of the assessment site shows the site is comprised of a one-story retail building with surface parking. Trees are located on the property, surrounding the property, and in typical landscaping planters in the surface parking area. (Source: Google Maps, Accessed 3-5-21) Bay West Development ● 800 Garden Mixed-Use Project ● Tree Inventory and Assessment Nov 22, 2022 ● Page 4 Urban Forestry Services | Bartlett Consulting ● A Division of The F. A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company 15119 McLean Road, Mount Vernon, WA ●1(360)399-1377 ● www.bartlett.com Findings The eighty-three (83) trees on this project site consist of eight (8) species, with a diameter range of 2.5 to 13.8-inches measured at 4.5 height above grade (DBH). Condition, including vigor and structure, range from dying/dead to fair/good. Thirty-two (32) of the eighty-three (83) trees are growing in a dedicated public right-of-way based on tree location and a site survey produced by KPFF Consulting Engineers and documents prepared by CarrierJohnston + Culture (See: Site Plan, Drawing No. A01.) Details of these trees are provided in the enclosed Tree Assessment Matrix (Table). The location of the trees can be viewed in the enclosed Tree Assessment Site Plan. Forty-one (41) of the trees on-site have a low to dead (Hazard or Dead) rating, with three (3) noted as dying or dead. The risk ratings for these trees are low, with many of the trees dying/dead or in poor condition being of a small size. Details of the tree’s condition, together with photographs are provided in the Tree Assessment Matrix. A table matrix is also provided for use as required. If requested, this table is available in Excel format. The corresponding tree location is shown in the Tree Assessment Site Plan. Key findings from this inventory and assessment are as follows: •None of the eighty-three (83) trees are Landmark Trees as defined in the City of Renton Municipal Code. •Excluding trees located within the dedicated right-of-way the project site contains 20 significant trees, as defined by the City of Renton Municipal Code. •Detailed information on each tree is provided in the attached Tree Assessment Matrix; this includes photographs. A second matrix that is in a table format that provides a list of trees has been provided. If requested, UFS|BC can provide the same information in an Excel.xlsx file for the City of Renton planning review process. •The location of each tree inspected, inventoried, and assessed on this project site please see the attached Tree Assessment Site Plan. •This project is in a planning zone classified as Renton Urban Center – 2 (UC-2.) •The UC-2 zone requires a 10% minimum tree retention requirement contained in the City of Renton 4-4-130 Tree Retention and Land Clearing Regulations: H.1.a.iii; and2 a Department of Community and Economic Development Tree Retention Worksheet is enclosed. Calculations on this sheet determined twelve (12) replacement trees are required because this project does plan on retaining trees but has an extensive tree replanting plan that is a part of the Landscape design (provided by others.) •Replacement trees shall be at least a two-inch (2”) caliper deciduous tree, or an evergreen at least six feet (6’) feet in height. The City of Renton has a list of prohibited trees that shall not be planted; RMC 4-4-130 H.7.a •This project is not subject to the minimum density requirements detailed in RMC 4-11- 130 H.C.9.d; Minimum Tree Density. This is because the project site is zoned commercial (UC-2.) Only residential properties are subject to minimum density requirements. 2 This requirement was confirmed with the City of Renton on March 22, 2022. Bay West Development ● 800 Garden Mixed-Use Project ● Tree Inventory and Assessment Nov 22, 2022 ● Page 5 Urban Forestry Services | Bartlett Consulting ● A Division of The F. A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company 15119 McLean Road, Mount Vernon, WA ●1(360)399-1377 ● www.bartlett.com •All trees on this project site are identified for removal. Therefore, no Tree Retention Plan is provided. •Per the city dedicated right-of-way (ROW) and ROW street cross-section it is assumed that all existing trees within the dedicated ROW shall be removed. New street/public trees will be planted as per the Landscape plans prepared by others. •A Land Development Permit (Defined in RMC 4-11-120, Definitions L) to remove trees within this project site. No tree removal is permitted prior to obtaining this permit from the City of Renton. Table 1 Tree Density Table Recommendations Obtain a Land Development Permit prior to removing any trees on this project site; information on the City of Renton requirements can be found at: Section 4-4-130 (codepublishing.com). Let me know if you have questions regarding this Tree Inventory, Assessment, and Arborist Report. Paul Hans Thompson, Consultant Telephone: 1(360) 855-5072 Email: pthompson@bartlett.com Literature Cited ISA Tree Risk Assessment Manual, 2nd ed., Dunster, L., Smiley, T., Matheny, N., and Lilly, S. 2017 International Society of Arboriculture. ISA Best Management Practice, Tree Risk Assessment, Smiley, T., Matheny, N., and Lilly, S. 2011 International Society of Arboriculture. ISA Best Management Practice, Managing Trees During Construction, Fite, K. Smiley, T. 2008 International Society of Arboriculture. Tree Risk Assessment in Urban Areas and Urban /Rural Interface, Dunster, J. 2009 Pacific Northwest Chapter, International Society of Arboriculture. City of Renton Tree Density Table Lot Net Lot Size Minimum Significant Trees Required New Trees Retained Trees Compliant 0823059217 465,256 Square feet 12 Twelve (12) replacement trees of a minimum size of 2-inches caliper or 6-foot height if planting evergreentrees. 0 Yes DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TREE RETENTION WORKSHEET Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 | www.rentonwa.gov 1.Total number of trees over 6” diameter1, or alder or cottonwood trees at least 8” in diameter on project site trees 2.Deductions: Certain trees are excluded from the retention calculation: Trees that are dangerous2 trees Trees in proposed public streets trees Trees in proposed private access easements/tracts trees Trees in critical areas3 and buffers trees Total number of excluded trees: trees 3.Subtract line 2 from line 1:trees 4.Next, to determine the number of trees that must be retained4, multiply line 3 by: 0.3 in zones RC, R-1, R-4, R-6 or R-8 0.2 in all other residential zones 0.1 in all commercial and industrial zones trees 5.List the number of 6” in diameter, or alder or cottonwood trees over 8” in diameter that you are proposing5 to retain4:trees 6.Subtract line 5 from line 4 for trees to be replaced: (if line 6 is zero or less, stop here. No replacement trees are required) trees 7.Multiply line 6 by 12” for number of required replacement inches:inches 8.Proposed size of trees to meet additional planting requirement: (Minimum 2” caliper trees required for replacement, otherwise enter 0)inches per tree 9.Divide line 7 by line 8 for number of replacement trees6: (If remainder is .5 or greater, round up to the next whole number)trees 1 Measured at 4.5’ above grade. 2 A tree certified, in a written report, as dead, terminally diseased, damaged, or otherwise dangerous to persons or property by a licensed landscape architect, or certified arborist, and approved by the City. 3 Critical areas, such as wetlands, streams, floodplains and protected slopes, are defined in RMC 4-3-050. 4 Count only those trees to be retained outside of critical areas and buffers. 5 The City may require modification of the tree retention plan to ensure retention of the maximum number of trees per RMC 4-4-130H7a. 6 When the required number of protected trees cannot be retained, replacement trees, with at least a two-inch (2") caliper or an evergreen at least six feet (6') tall, shall be planted. See RMC 4-4-130.H.1.e.(ii) for prohibited types of replacement trees. 1 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Tree Retention Worksheet.docx 08/2015 Minimum Tree Density A minimum tree density shall be maintained on each residentially zoned lot (exempting single-family dwellings in R-10 and R-14). The tree density may consist of existing trees, replacement trees, or a combination. Detached single-family development7: Two (2) significant trees8 for every five thousand (5,000) sq. ft. of lot area. For example, a lot with 9,600 square feet and a detached single-family house is required to have four (4) significant trees or their equivalent in caliper inches (one or more trees with a combined diameter of 24”). This is determined with the following formula: Multi-family development (attached dwellings): Four (4) significant trees8 for every five thousand (5,000) sq. ft. of lot area. Example Tree Density Table: Lot Lot size Min significant trees required New Trees Retained Trees Compliant 1 5,000 2 2 @ 2” caliper 0 Yes 2 10,000 4 0 1 tree (24 caliper inches) Yes 3 15,000 6 2 @ 2” caliper 1 Maple – 15 caliper inches 1 Fir – 9 caliper inches. Yes 7 Lots developed with detached dwellings in the R-10 and R-14 zoned are exempt from maintaining a minimum number of significant trees onsite, however they are not exempt from the annual tree removal limits. 8 Or the gross equivalent of caliper inches provided by one (1) or more trees. 2 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Tree Retention Worksheet.docx 08/2015 The 800 Garden Mixed-Use Project is commercially zoned as Urban Center - 2 and is therefore exempt. ROW dedication tree (32) Significant on-property tree (20) Non-significant tree (31) RAILROAD TRACKS RAILROAD TRACKS RAILROAD TRACKSRAILROADTRACKSRAILROADTRACKSRAILROADTRACKSRAILROADTRACKSRAILROAD TRACKS C1C2 C3 C4C5 L3C2 393939393938 3 7 37 36 37 36 36 36 37 36 36 37 3637 37 3637 3 5 35 36 35 34333236 35 36 30'30'30'30'30'30'40'40'40'30'30'IRRIRRIRRLTLTLTLTLTLTLTLTLTLTLTLTLTLTLTLTLTLTLTLTLTLTLTLTLTLTLTLTWWWWUUUUTTTTTSVSSSSSSSSDDDDDDDDDDDDDDPPPPPPPPPPGGGGWWW W WWW W W W WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWPIVGGGGWB-67AASHTO 2018 (US)(c) 2021 Transoft Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.WB-67AASHTO 2018 (US)(c) 2021 Transoft Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.WB-67AASHTO 2018 (US)(c) 2021 Transoft Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.WB-67AASHTO 2018 (US)(c) 2021 Transoft Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.WB-67AASHTO 2018 (US)(c) 2021 Transoft Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.WB-67AASHTO 2018 (US)(c) 2021 Transoft Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.WB-67AASHTO 2018 (US)(c) 2021 Transoft Solutions, Inc.All rights reserved.WB-67AASHTO 2018 (US)(c) 2021 Transoft Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.(c) 2022 Transoft Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.(c) 2022 Transoft Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. (c) 2022 Transoft Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.(c) 2022 Transoft Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.CB1CB1CB1CB1CB1 CB1CB1CB1C B 1 CB1 CB14 85 A621a 2 A621a 3 A621a 1 A621b 2 A621b 303' - 8" GARDEN AVE N N 8TH STINTERIOR ACCESS ROADRAILROAD TRACK RESIDENTIAL PARKING ENTRY RESIDENTIAL PARKING ENTRY RETAIL / RESIDENTIAL PARKING ACCESS REMOVE (E) TREE RETAIL /RESIDENTIAL PARKING ACCESS LOADING PROPERTY LINE DEDICATION LINE PHASE 1 / BUILDING A PHASE 2 / BUILDING B PHASE 3 / BUILDING C DRIVEWAY ACCESS PUBLIC PLAZA PEDESTRIAN PLAZA PEDESTRIAN PLAZA TARGET PARKING LOT TARGET LOWES PARKING LOT ± 42' - 9"LOBBY ACCESS RETAIL ACCESS 60' - 6"60' - 6"308' - 0"351' - 7 5/8" DEDICATION LINE PROPOSED PLANTING STRIP PROPOSED SIDEWALK PROPOSED SIDEWALK PROPOSED PLANTING STRIP PARALLEL PARKING ZONE362' - 6"2' - 0"23' - 6"48' - 0" 30' - 6" DEDICATION LINE RESIDENTIAL PARKING ENTRY 23' - 6"20' - 0"20' - 0" CLEAR VISION AREA NO STRUCTURE OVER 3'-6" HEIGHT INTERIOR ACCESS ROAD N 89°28'23" W 546.95'N 00°29'41" E 167.75' N 4 4 °0 6 '1 8 " W 5 2 .7 2 'N06°39'21"W 32.95' S 18°00'20" E 352.55' N 10°53'46" W32.94' S 18°08'48" E 31.68'N 71°59'30" E 396.11'S 18°01'40" E 912.13' EXISTING ROW WIDTH 60'EXISTING ROW WIDTH 70'PROPOSED CURB PROPOSED CURB NEW STREET TREES TYP. 20' - 0"PLAZAEXISTING POWER POLE TYP. TO REMAIN ADJACENT ZONING - IH ADJACENT ZONING UC-2ADJACENT ZONING UC-2ADJACENT ZONING - IH FENCE W/GATE FENCE W/GATE35' - 6"100' - 0"20' - 0"6' - 0"6' - 0"16' - 0"8' - 0"24' - 0"5' - 0"26' - 0" 20' - 0" 8' - 0" 8' - 0" 18' - 0" 5' - 0" PARKING ACCESS 34.50 34.50 34.50 7.63% UP 35.49 34.01 4.09% UPUP 5.50% 32.75 33.30 32.7532.20 UP 4.16%33.0034.11 7.40% UP RAMP 2.84% UP33.80 31.75 31.75 UP 5.26% RAMP 31.50 31.67 31.75 31.75 31.67 32.75 34.50 34.50 34.50 34.5032.7531.75 33.0033.0033.0033.0033.00 33.00 31.75 33.00 UP 4.57% RAMP33.00 31.75 R A M P 4.2 2 % U P DRIVEWAY ACCESS DEDICATION VARIES24.9' - 25.5' 34.62 31.50 36.74 7' - 6"2' - 0"± 11' - 10" B.O.H RETAIL / COM RETAIL / COM LOBBY BIKE STORAGEB.O.H TRASH ROOM RETAIL /GUEST PARKING PARKING TRASH ROOM LOBBY DOG WASHBIKE STORAGEB.O.H RETAIL / COM RETAIL / COMRES / LOBBY BIKE STORAGE B.O.H TRASH ROOM TRASH ROOM B.O.H BIKE STORAGELOBBY DOG WASH B.O.H B.O.HB.O.H RETAIL /GUEST PARKING 13,144 SF RETAIL /GUEST PARKING B.O.H B.O.H TRASH ROOMTRASH ROOM LOADING RETAIL / GROCER TRASH ROOM AMENITY / LOBBY B.O.H RETAIL ACCESS LOBBY ACCESS LOBBY ACCESS RETAIL ACCESS 5' - 0" ± 25' - 0" ± 5' - 11" 5' - 0" SIDEWALK PLANTING 5' - 0" ± 7' - 6" 31.75 9' - 4" ± 9' - 0" 5' - 1"14' - 7" LOBBY DOG WASHBIKE STORAGEPARKING AMENITYPARKING LOBBY DOG WASH AMENITYRETAIL / COM 31.83 32.75 32.75 32.75 32.75 32.75 32.75 32.75 33.00 33.00 33.00 31.75 33.80 32.75 32.75 34.50 34.50 34.50 34.50 34.50 34.50 9' - 10" 31.50 31.75 31.67 32.75 PROJECT NO: FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY:ALL IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY, AND THE PROPERTY OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON, AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGN, ARRANGEMENTS, OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE. FILING THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITH ANY PUBLIC AGENCY IS NOT A PUBLICATION OF SAME. NO COPYING, REPRODUCTION OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CARRIER JOHNSON + CULTURE. TITLE: DRAWING NO: ISSUES: WRITE CENTRAL FILE PATH HERE: (I.E. P:\0000.000\BIM\Central File\0000.00-central.rvt) NO.SUBMITTAL DATE LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION 05-12-22 11/18/2022 7:23:07 PM 6042.00 Author Checker SITE PLAN A102800 GARDEN800 Garden Ave N, Renton WAA102 SITE PLAN SITE CALCULATIONS: SITE AREA -501,641 SF (11.52 ACRES) AREA OF DEDICATIONS -36,385 SF SITE AREA EXCL. DEDICATIONS - 465,256 SF LOT COVERAGE (BUILDING FOOTPRINT INC. COVERED AREAS) - ALLOWABLE LOT COVERAGE - 100% PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE - 339,877/501,641 = 67.75% PHASE 1 / BUILDING A - 115,061 SF PHASE 2 / BUILDING B - 114,820 SF PHASE 3 / BUILDING C - 109,996 SF TOTAL 339,877 SF EXISTING BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA - 154,409.24 SF EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA -447,663 SF EXISITNG PERVIOUS AREA -17,590 SF PHASE 1 ON-SITE PROPOSED CONDITION PERVIOUS: 12,428 SF IMPERVIOUS: 137,021 SF PHASE 2 ON-SITE PROPOSED CONDITION PERVIOUS: 20,219 SF IMPERVIOUS: 134,415 SF PHASE 3 ON-SITE PROPOSED CONDITION PERVIOUS: 21,309 SF IMPERVIOUS: 139,863 SF FRONT SETBACK - REQUIRED - MIN FRONT - 15 FT, MAX. FRONT 20 FT PROVDED - VARIES GARDEN AVE N - PHASE 1 / BUILDING A - 0 FEET PHASE 2 / BUILDING B - 0 TO 36 FEET PHASE 3 / BUILDING C - 54 FEET TO 127 FEET N. 8TH STREET- PHASE 3 / BUILDING C - 0 FEET SIDE SETBACK - REQUIRED - NONE PROVIDED - PHASE 1 / BUILDING A - 27'-6" REAR SETBACK - REQUIRED - NONE PROVIDED - +/- 39'-9" ALLLOWABLE HEIGHT - 10 STORIES PROPOSED HEIGHT- PHASE 1 / BUILDING A - 8 STORIES - +/- 84' ABOVE LEVEL 1 FFE; LEVEL 1 FFE VARIES PHASE 2 / BUILDING B - 7 STORIES - +/- 74' ABOVE LEVEL 1 FFE; LEVEL 1 FFE VARIES PHASE 3 / BUILDING C - 7 STORIES - +/- 73' ABOVE LEVEL 1 FFE; LEVEL 1 FFE VARIES PROPOSED PERIMETER/OFF SITE PLANTED AREA - MIN. 8' WIDE PLANTING STRIP 10,241 SF PARKING CALCULATIONS / BUILDING AREAS - REFER TO G101 SCALE:1" = 40'-0" 1 SITE PLAN - OPTION 1 SETBACK STOPSTOP STOP 612 Woodland Square Loop SE,Suite 100Lacey, WA 98503360.292.7230www.kpff.com STOPSTOP STOP NO P A R K I N G F I R E L A N E NO P A R K I N G F I R E LA N E NO P A R K I N G F I R E L AN E NO PA R K IN G F IR E LA N E N O P A RK I N G F I R E L A N E NO P A R K IN G F I R E LA N E 612 Woodland Square Loop SE,Suite 100Lacey, WA 98503360.292.7230www.kpff.com STOPSTOPSTOPS T O P NO P A R K I NG F I R E L AN E NO P AR K I NG F I R E L AN E NO P A R K I NG F I R E LA N E N O P A RK I N G F I R E L A N ENO PARKING FIRE LANE612 Woodland Square Loop SE,Suite 100Lacey, WA 98503360.292.7230www.kpff.com STOPSTOPNO PARKING FIRE LANENO PARKING FIRE LANESTOP 612 Woodland Square Loop SE,Suite 100Lacey, WA 98503360.292.7230www.kpff.com STOP612 Woodland Square Loop SE,Suite 100Lacey, WA 98503360.292.7230www.kpff.com N O P A R K I N G F I R E L A N E NO P A R K I NG F I R E L AN E 612 Woodland Square Loop SE,Suite 100Lacey, WA 98503360.292.7230www.kpff.com 800 Garden Mixed Use Project 800 Garden Avenue North, Renton WA Assessor: P.H. ThompsonSite Work: 1/26/21 Tree No.DBH (in)QMD (in)Species, Common Species, Botanical Critical Root Zone (ft)Dripline Radius (ft)Vigor Structure Canopy Area (sqft) Notes, Defects, and Comments Preservation Value Risk Rating Recommendation(s); Significant designation and ROW dedication classification 401 9.1 9.1 White fir Abies concolor 9.1 7.5 Fair Fair to Good 176.7 The foliage is showing some slight yellowing.Medium Low ROW dedication tree 402 8 8 White fir Abies concolor 8 7 Fair Fair to Good 153.9 The foliage is showing a yellow color in the lower branches of this tree. Medium Low Significant tree 403 4.2 4.2 White fir Abies concolor 4.2 3 Dying/Dead Fair to Good 28.3 Very little live foliage remains. This tree should be considered dead. Hazard or Dead Low Non-significant tree 404 7.7 7.7 White fir Abies concolor 7.7 5.8 Fair Fair 105.7 A portion of the roots from this tree are visible on the soil surface, and this tree leans toward the north. The lean is currently stable. Foliage in mid section of this trees crown is yellow in color. Low Low Significant tree 405 8.9 8.9 White fir Abies concolor 8.9 6.9 Fair Fair to Good 149.6 This tree has a very slight yellow color to foliage across the crown. Medium Low Significant tree 406 8 8 White fir Abies concolor 8 6 Fair Fair to Good 113.1 This tree has a very slight yellow color to foliage across the crown (similar to Tree 405.) Medium Low Significant tree 407 4.5 4.5 Garry oak Quercus garryana 4.5 5 Fair Fair 78.5 The branch arrangement on this tree are not structured. Medium Low Non-significant tree 408 7.4 7.4 Linden Tilia species 7.4 7.5 Fair to Good Fair 176.7 This tree has a tight trunk arrangement, with a weaker strength than the same tree species without this structure. The current trunk structure is typically a stable structure in this species. This tree could benefit from subordination pruning. Low Low Subordinate Prune; Significant tree 409 5.3 5.3 Western red cedar Thuja plicata 5.3 5 Poor to Fair Poor to Fair 78.5 Poor pruning was completed in the past to remove lower branches. The southeast face of lower trunk has dead cambium, with sloughing bark and insect activity. This contributes to this trees poor to fair vigor and structure rating. Low Low ROW dedication tree Main Office: 15119 McLean Road, Mount Vernon, WA 98273 Telephone: 1(360)399-1377 800 Garden Mixed Use Project 800 Garden Avenue North, Renton WA Assessor: P.H. ThompsonSite Work: 1/26/21 Tree No.DBH (in)QMD (in)Species, Common Species, Botanical Critical Root Zone (ft)Dripline Radius (ft)Vigor Structure Canopy Area (sqft) Notes, Defects, and Comments Preservation Value Risk Rating Recommendation(s); Significant designation and ROW dedication classification 410 8.8 8.8 Linden Tilia species 8.8 9 Fair to Good Fair to Good 254.5 Branch growth from this tree may interfere with lighting. If this tree is retained it should be pruned for structure and light clearance. Medium Low Clearance Pruning; Significant tree 411 11.1 11.1 Western white pine Pinus monticola 11.1 11.5 Fair to Good Fair to Good 415.5 Medium Low ROW dedication tree 412 10.1 10.1 Western white pine Pinus monticola 10.1 9 Fair to Good Fair to Good 254.5 Medium Low ROW dedication tree 413 4.4 6.213 Western red cedar Thuja plicata 6.2 5 Poor Poor to Fair 78.5 This tree has three (3) codominant trunks, with poor structural arrangement. Inspection also noted basal trunk decay, and bark loss on the lower trunk. Two of three leaders are dying. Low Low ROW dedication tree 414 7.8 7.8 Linden Tilia species 7.8 13 Fair to Good Fair to Good 530.9 Medium Low Significant tree 415 7.9 7.9 White fir Abies concolor 7.9 8 Fair to Good Fair to Good 201.1 Low Low ROW dedication tree 416 11.1 11.1 White fir Abies concolor 11.1 9 Fair to Good Fair to Good 254.5 This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention. Low Low ROW dedication tree 417 5.9 5.9 Linden Tilia species 5.9 8.5 Fair Fair 227.0 If this tree is retained, prune for structure. Root growth is causing damage to parking lot asphalt surface. Medium Low Structural Pruning; Non- significant tree 418 7.2 7.2 Linden Tilia species 7.2 8.5 Fair Fair 227.0 If this tree is retained prune for structure. This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention. Medium Low Structural Pruning; Significant tree 419 6.8 6.8 Oak Quercus species 6.8 8 Fair to Good Fair 201.1 If this tree is retained prune for structure.Medium Low Structural Pruning; ROW dedication tree Main Office: 15119 McLean Road, Mount Vernon, WA 98273 Telephone: 1(360)399-1377 800 Garden Mixed Use Project 800 Garden Avenue North, Renton WA Assessor: P.H. ThompsonSite Work: 1/26/21 Tree No.DBH (in)QMD (in)Species, Common Species, Botanical Critical Root Zone (ft)Dripline Radius (ft)Vigor Structure Canopy Area (sqft) Notes, Defects, and Comments Preservation Value Risk Rating Recommendation(s); Significant designation and ROW dedication classification 420 5.5 5.5 Oak Quercus species 5.5 6.5 Fair Fair 132.7 If this tree is retained prune for structure. This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention. Medium Low Structural Pruning; ROW dedication tree 421 8.4 8.4 Linden Tilia species 8.4 14.5 Fair to Good Fair 660.5 If this tree is retained prune for structure.Medium Low Structural Pruning; Significant tree 422 8.9 8.9 Oak Quercus species 8.9 13 Fair to Good Fair 530.9 This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention. Low Low ROW dedication tree 423 9.5 9.5 White fir Abies concolor 9.5 9 Fair to Good Fair to Good 254.5 Insect attack in the lower trunk causing sap flow on the lower trunk. Medium Low ROW dedication tree 424 5 5 White fir Abies concolor 5 5 Fair to Good Fair to Good 78.5 Foliage has a pale and yellow appearance.Medium Low Non-significant tree 425 9.2 9.2 Linden Tilia species 9.2 Fair to Good Fair If retained this tree should be prune for structure.Medium Low Structural Pruning; Significant tree 426 3 3 Callery pear var.Prunus calleryana var. 3 4.7 Fair to Good Fair 69.4 Low Low Non-significant tree 427 8.7 8.7 Oak Quercus species 8.7 9.7 Fair to Good Fair 295.6 This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention. Low Low ROW dedication tree 428 9.3 9.3 Oak Quercus species 9.3 9.7 Fair to Good Fair 295.6 This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention. Low Low ROW dedication tree Main Office: 15119 McLean Road, Mount Vernon, WA 98273 Telephone: 1(360)399-1377 800 Garden Mixed Use Project 800 Garden Avenue North, Renton WA Assessor: P.H. ThompsonSite Work: 1/26/21 Tree No.DBH (in)QMD (in)Species, Common Species, Botanical Critical Root Zone (ft)Dripline Radius (ft)Vigor Structure Canopy Area (sqft) Notes, Defects, and Comments Preservation Value Risk Rating Recommendation(s); Significant designation and ROW dedication classification 429 9.3 9.3 Oak Quercus species 9.3 12.5 Fair to Good Fair 490.9 This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention. Low Low ROW dedication tree 430 7.3 7.3 Oak Quercus species 7.3 11 Fair to Good Fair 380.1 This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention. Low Low ROW dedication tree 431 12.9 12.9 Western white pine 12.9 12.9 Fair Fair to Good 522.8 Medium Low Significant tree 432 13.8 13.8 Western white pine Pinus monticola 13.8 12.9 Fair Fair 522.8 The trunk of this tree has two codominant branches that form into two main codominant leaders. Low Low Significant tree 433 5.5 5.5 Oak Quercus species 5.5 8 Fair Fair 201.1 This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention. Low Low ROW dedication tree 434 4.7 4.7 Oak Quercus species 4.7 6.5 Fair to Good Fair 132.7 This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention. Low Low ROW dedication tree 435 9.9 9.9 Western white pine Pinus monticola 9.9 5.7 Fair Fair to Good 102.1 Medium Low Significant tree 436 12.3 12.3 White fir Abies concolor 12.3 7.7 Fair to Good Fair to Good 186.3 Standard form.Medium Low Significant tree 437 9 9 White fir Abies concolor 9 7.7 Fair to Good Fair to Good 186.3 Blue form.Medium Low ROW dedication tree 438 9.1 9.1 White fir Abies concolor 9.1 7.7 Fair to Good Fair to Good 186.3 Blue form.Medium Low ROW dedication tree 439 12.1 12.1 White fir Abies concolor 12.1 7.7 Fair to Good Fair to Good 186.3 Blue form.Medium Low ROW dedication tree 440 7.9 7.9 Oak Quercus species 7.9 10.5 Fair to Good Fair 346.4 This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention. Medium Low ROW dedication tree Main Office: 15119 McLean Road, Mount Vernon, WA 98273 Telephone: 1(360)399-1377 800 Garden Mixed Use Project 800 Garden Avenue North, Renton WA Assessor: P.H. ThompsonSite Work: 1/26/21 Tree No.DBH (in)QMD (in)Species, Common Species, Botanical Critical Root Zone (ft)Dripline Radius (ft)Vigor Structure Canopy Area (sqft) Notes, Defects, and Comments Preservation Value Risk Rating Recommendation(s); Significant designation and ROW dedication classification 441 8.5 8.5 Oak Quercus species 8.5 10.5 Fair Fair 346.4 This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention. Medium Low ROW dedication tree 442 6.2 6.2 Oak Quercus species 6.2 10.5 Fair Fair 346.4 This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention. Medium Low ROW dedication tree 443 8.8 8.8 Oak Quercus species 8.8 12.5 Fair Fair 380.1 This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention. Medium Low ROW dedication tree 444 7.8 7.8 Oak Quercus species 7.8 10.5 Fair Fair 346.4 This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention. Medium Low ROW dedication tree 445 9.5 9.5 Oak Quercus species 9.5 10.5 Fair Fair 346.4 This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention. Medium Low ROW dedication tree 446 8.5 8.5 Western white pine Pinus monticola 8.5 9.5 Fair to Good Fair to Good 283.5 This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention. Low Low ROW dedication tree 447 8.7 8.7 Oak Quercus species 8.7 12.5 Fair to Good Fair 490.9 This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention. Medium Low ROW dedication tree 448 7.3 7.3 Oak Quercus species 7.3 12.5 Fair to Good Fair 490.9 This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention. Medium Low ROW dedication tree Main Office: 15119 McLean Road, Mount Vernon, WA 98273 Telephone: 1(360)399-1377 800 Garden Mixed Use Project 800 Garden Avenue North, Renton WA Assessor: P.H. ThompsonSite Work: 1/26/21 Tree No.DBH (in)QMD (in)Species, Common Species, Botanical Critical Root Zone (ft)Dripline Radius (ft)Vigor Structure Canopy Area (sqft) Notes, Defects, and Comments Preservation Value Risk Rating Recommendation(s); Significant designation and ROW dedication classification 449 5 5 Oak Quercus species 5 12.5 Fair to Good Fair 490.9 This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention. Medium Low ROW dedication tree 450 4 4 Oak Quercus species 4 12.5 Fair to Good Fair 490.9 This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention. Medium Low ROW dedication tree 451 8.5 8.5 Oak Quercus species 8.5 12.5 Fair to Good Fair 490.9 This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention. Medium Low ROW dedication tree 452 2.6 2.6 Japanese snowbell Styrax japonicus 2.6 2.5 Fair Fair 19.6 The crown of this tree does not appear to have grown to normal proportions, appearing slightly stunted and thin in terms of branch density. Low Low Non-significant tree 453 4.7 4.7 Japanese snowbell Styrax japonicus 4.7 2.5 Fair Fair 19.6 This tree has a long 3 foot lower trunk injury. The crown of this tree does not appear to have grown to normal proportions, appearing slightly stunted and thin in terms of branch density. Low Low Non-significant tree 454 3.5 3.5 Japanese snowbell Styrax japonicus 3.5 2.5 Fair Fair 26.0 The crown of this tree does not appear to have grown to normal proportions, appearing slightly stunted and thin in terms of branch density. Not the trunk of this tree has a bend, giving this tree the appearance of a lean and malformed structure. Low Low Non-significant tree 455 2.7 2.7 Japanese snowbell Styrax japonicus 2.7 2.5 Fair Fair 19.6 The trunk of this tree has a long 2-1/2 foot trunk injury. The crown of this tree does not appear to have grown to normal proportions, appearing slightly stunted and thin in terms of branch density. Low Low Non-significant tree Main Office: 15119 McLean Road, Mount Vernon, WA 98273 Telephone: 1(360)399-1377 800 Garden Mixed Use Project 800 Garden Avenue North, Renton WA Assessor: P.H. ThompsonSite Work: 1/26/21 Tree No.DBH (in)QMD (in)Species, Common Species, Botanical Critical Root Zone (ft)Dripline Radius (ft)Vigor Structure Canopy Area (sqft) Notes, Defects, and Comments Preservation Value Risk Rating Recommendation(s); Significant designation and ROW dedication classification 456 2.5 2.5 Japanese snowbell Styrax japonicus 2.5 2.5 Fair Fair 19.6 This tree has a long 2 foot section of trunk die- back on lower trunk. This may be a response to reflected heat from the surrounding asphalt. The crown of this tree does not appear to have grown to normal proportions, appearing slightly stunted and thin in terms of branch density. Low Low Non-significant tree 457 2.7 2.7 Japanese snowbell Styrax japonicus 2.7 2.5 Fair Fair 19.6 This tree has a long 2 foot section of trunk die- back on lower trunk. This may be a response to reflected heat from the surrounding asphalt. The crown of this tree does not appear to have grown to normal proportions, appearing slightly stunted and thin in terms of branch density. Low Low Non-significant tree 458 3.2 3.2 Japanese snowbell Styrax japonicus 3.2 2.5 Fair Fair 19.6 This tree has multiple trunk injuries, small in size. I noticed some branch failure, possibly from vehicle(s) striking tree branches. Low Low Non-significant tree 459 3.6 3.6 Japanese snowbell Styrax japonicus 3.6 2.5 Fair Poor to Fair 19.6 This tree has trunk die-back, aligned vertically on the west face of the trunk. Fruiting bodies (decay fungi) are visible in the section of affected trunk. Low Low Non-significant tree 460 7.1 7.1 Linden Tilia species 7.1 7.5 Fair Poor to Fair 176.7 The lower 5 feet and 20% of the circumference on the trunk of this tree is dead, with sunken cracked bark, and fruiting bodies (decay fungi) on it. The lower trunk at the soil line contains decay and a small cavity. This condition is reflected in the structure and preservation values of this tree. Low Low Significant tree 461 6.5 6.5 Linden Tilia species 6.5 8 Fair Fair 201.1 Medium Low Significant tree Main Office: 15119 McLean Road, Mount Vernon, WA 98273 Telephone: 1(360)399-1377 800 Garden Mixed Use Project 800 Garden Avenue North, Renton WA Assessor: P.H. ThompsonSite Work: 1/26/21 Tree No.DBH (in)QMD (in)Species, Common Species, Botanical Critical Root Zone (ft)Dripline Radius (ft)Vigor Structure Canopy Area (sqft) Notes, Defects, and Comments Preservation Value Risk Rating Recommendation(s); Significant designation and ROW dedication classification 462 5.5 5.5 Linden Tilia species 5.5 7.5 Fair Fair 176.7 I noticed that this tree has some basal sprouts; typically these develop on this species following injury. Medium Low Non-significant tree 463 6.1 6.1 Linden Tilia species 6.1 7.5 Fair Fair 176.7 I noticed that this tree has some basal sprouts; typically these develop on this species following injury. Medium Low Significant tree 464 4 4 Linden Tilia species 4 7.5 Fair Fair 176.7 This tree has a lower basal injury, measuring approximately 6” x 4-1/2” on the northeast side of the trunk. Medium Low Non-significant tree 465 3.7 3.7 Callery pear var.Prunus calleryana var. 3.7 3 Fair Fair 28.3 Some die-back observed in one of the leaders of this tree. However, due to the condition of the remaining crown I still rate the vigor of this tree as fair. Medium Low Non-significant tree 466 3.6 3.6 Callery pear var.Prunus calleryana var. 3.6 3 Fair Fair 28.3 Some minor die-back is noticeable in the crown of this tree. Medium Low Non-significant tree 467 6.2 6.2 Linden Tilia species 6.2 7 Fair to Good Fair 153.9 This tree has basal sprouts. I noticed a basal trunk injury on west side of the lower trunk; measuring 6” x 2”, with some decay present. Medium Low Non-significant tree 468 5.5 5.5 Linden Tilia species 5.5 7.5 Fair to Good Fair 176.7 This tree has basal sprouts. I noticed a basal trunk injury on west side of the lower trunk,measuring 5’ x 4”; some decay associated with this injury is present. Low Low Non-significant tree 469 5.8 5.8 Linden Tilia species 5.8 7.5 Fair to Good Fair to Good 176.7 This tree has basal sprouts. Low Low Non-significant tree 470 5.8 5.8 Linden Tilia species 5.8 7.5 Fair to Good Fair to Good 176.7 This tree has basal sprouts. Low Low Non-significant tree 471 5.9 5.9 Linden Tilia species 5.9 7.5 Fair to Good Fair 176.7 This tree has broken branches, and lodged and hanging branches and a dead long section on the west face of the trunk, 4 feet in length. This condition is reflected in this trees fair structure rating. Low Low Crown clean prune; Non- significant tree 472 5.9 5.9 Linden Tilia species 5.9 7.5 Fair to Good Fair 176.7 This tree has basal sprouts.Low Low Non-significant tree 473 6.5 6.5 Linden Tilia species 6.5 7.5 Fair to Good Fair 176.7 This tree has basal sprouts. Low Low Significant tree Main Office: 15119 McLean Road, Mount Vernon, WA 98273 Telephone: 1(360)399-1377 800 Garden Mixed Use Project 800 Garden Avenue North, Renton WA Assessor: P.H. ThompsonSite Work: 1/26/21 Tree No.DBH (in)QMD (in)Species, Common Species, Botanical Critical Root Zone (ft)Dripline Radius (ft)Vigor Structure Canopy Area (sqft) Notes, Defects, and Comments Preservation Value Risk Rating Recommendation(s); Significant designation and ROW dedication classification 474 3.6 3.6 Callery pear var.Prunus calleryana var. 3.6 4 Fair Fair 50.3 I noted some minor die-back in upper branches and leaders of this tree. This state of vigor is reflected in the fair rating. Low Low Non-significant tree 475 4 4 Callery pear var.Prunus calleryana var. 4 1 Fair Fair 33.2 I noted some minor die-back in the upper branches and leaders of this tree. This state of vigor is reflected in the fair rating. Low Low Non-significant tree 476 5.7 5.7 Linden Tilia species 5.7 7.8 Fair Fair 191.1 This tree has basal sprouts. The crown contains small broken branches. Low Low Non-significant tree 477 5.3 5.3 Linden Tilia species 5.3 7.8 Fair Fair 191.1 This tree has basal sprouts. This tree has been badly pruned. Low Low Non-significant tree 478 6.1 6.1 Linden Tilia species 6.1 7.8 Fair Fair 191.1 This tree has basal sprouts. This tree has been badly pruned. Low Low Significant tree 479 4.9 4.9 Linden Tilia species 4.9 7.8 Fair Fair 149.6 This tree has basal sprouts. This tree has been badly pruned. Low Low Non-significant tree 480 5.9 5.9 Linden Tilia species 5.9 7.8 Fair Fair 187.5 This tree has basal sprouts. This tree has been badly pruned. Low Low Non-significant tree 481 8.6 8.6 Western white pine Pinus monticola 8.6 9.3 Fair Fair to Good 271.7 This tree lacks an apical dominant structure typical of this species. It is therefor possible that this tree is a cultivar, developed to have a smaller form. Medium Low Significant tree 482 2.7 2.7 Japanese snowbell Styrax japonicus 2.7 2.5 Poor Poor to Fair 19.6 Declining health, with cambium die-back, and dead branching in the upper crown. This is reflected in this trees preservation value of 'hazard or dead.' Hazard or Dead Low Non-significant tree 483 3.5 3.5 Japanese snowbell Styrax japonicus 3.5 2.7 Poor Poor to Fair 22.9 Declining health, with cambium die-back, and fungal fruiting bodies in the lower 3 feet of trunk. This is reflected in this trees preservation value of 'hazard or dead.' Hazard or Dead Low Non-significant tree Main Office: 15119 McLean Road, Mount Vernon, WA 98273 Telephone: 1(360)399-1377 Tree Assessment Matrix ASSESSOR: ASSESSMENT DATE: TELEPHONE: 1(360)428-5810 BAY WEST COMPANY 800 Garden Ave N Renton, Wa 98057 1/26/2021 Thompson. P. H. 3/11/2021 Main Office: 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1 (360) 428 5810 www.bartlett.com/bartlett-consulting.cfm Satellite Office: 19331 21st Avenue West Lynnwood, WA 98036 1 (206) 367 4048 1 Tree Assessment Matrix Bay West Company 800 Garden Ave N Renton, WA 98057 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1(360)428-5810 Tree 401 Fair Fair to GoodWhite fir 9.1 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Medium Recommendations Abies concolor The foliage is showing some slight yellowing.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 9.17.5 Tree 402 Fair Fair to GoodWhite fir 8.0 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Medium Recommendations Abies concolor The foliage is showing a yellow color in the lower branches of this tree.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 8.07.0 2 Tree Assessment Matrix Bay West Company 800 Garden Ave N Renton, WA 98057 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1(360)428-5810 Tree 403 Dying/Dead Fair to GoodWhite fir 4.2 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Hazard or Dead Recommendations Abies concolor Very little live foliage remains. This tree should be considered dead.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 4.23.0 Tree 404 Fair FairWhite fir 7.7 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Low Recommendations Abies concolor A portion of the roots from this tree are visible on the soil surface, and this tree leans toward the north. The lean is currently stable. Foliage in mid section of this trees crown is yellow in color.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 7.75.8 3 Tree Assessment Matrix Bay West Company 800 Garden Ave N Renton, WA 98057 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1(360)428-5810 Tree 405 Fair Fair to GoodWhite fir 8.9 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Medium Recommendations Abies concolor This tree has a very slight yellow color to foliage across the crown.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 8.96.9 Tree 406 Fair Fair to GoodWhite fir 8.0 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Medium Recommendations Abies concolor This tree has a very slight yellow color to foliage across the crown (similar to Tree 405.)Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 8.06.0 4 Tree Assessment Matrix Bay West Company 800 Garden Ave N Renton, WA 98057 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1(360)428-5810 Tree 407 Fair FairGarry oak 4.5 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Medium Recommendations Quercus garryana The branch arrangement on this tree are not structured.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 4.55.0 Tree 408 Fair to Good FairLinden7.4 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Low Subordinate Prune Recommendations Tilia species This tree has a tight trunk arrangement, with a weaker strength than the same tree species without this structure. The current trunk structure is typically a stable structure in this species. This tree could benefit from subordination pruning.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 7.47.5 5 Tree Assessment Matrix Bay West Company 800 Garden Ave N Renton, WA 98057 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1(360)428-5810 Tree 409 Poor to Fair Poor to FairWestern red cedar 5.3 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Low Recommendations Thuja plicata Poor pruning was completed in the past to remove lower branches. The southeast face of lower trunk has dead cambium, with sloughing bark and insect activity. This contributes to this trees poor to fair vigor and structure rating.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 5.35.0 Tree 410 Fair to Good Fair to GoodLinden8.8 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Medium Clearance Pruning Recommendations Tilia species Branch growth from this tree may interfere with lighting. If this tree is retained it should be pruned for structure and light clearance.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 8.89.0 6 Tree Assessment Matrix Bay West Company 800 Garden Ave N Renton, WA 98057 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1(360)428-5810 Tree 411 Fair to Good Fair to GoodWestern white pine 11.1 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Medium Recommendations Pinus monticola Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 11.111.5 Tree 412 Fair to Good Fair to GoodWestern white pine 10.1 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Medium Recommendations Pinus monticola Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 10.19.0 7 Tree Assessment Matrix Bay West Company 800 Garden Ave N Renton, WA 98057 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1(360)428-5810 Tree 413 Poor Poor to FairWestern red cedar 6.2 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Low Recommendations Thuja plicata This tree has three (3) codominant trunks, with poor structural arrangement. Inspection also noted basal trunk decay, and bark loss on the lower trunk. Two of three leaders are dying.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 6.25.0 Tree 414 Fair to Good Fair to GoodLinden7.8 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Medium Recommendations Tilia species Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 7.813.0 8 Tree Assessment Matrix Bay West Company 800 Garden Ave N Renton, WA 98057 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1(360)428-5810 Tree 415 Fair to Good Fair to GoodWhite fir 7.9 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Low Recommendations Abies concolor Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 7.98.0 Tree 416 Fair to Good Fair to GoodWhite fir 11.1 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Low Recommendations Abies concolor This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 11.19.0 9 Tree Assessment Matrix Bay West Company 800 Garden Ave N Renton, WA 98057 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1(360)428-5810 Tree 417 Fair FairLinden5.9 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Medium Structural Pruning Recommendations Tilia species If this tree is retained, prune for structure. Root growth is causing damage to parking lot asphalt surface.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 5.98.5 Tree 418 Fair FairLinden7.2 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Medium Structural Pruning Recommendations Tilia species If this tree is retained prune for structure. This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 7.28.5 10 Tree Assessment Matrix Bay West Company 800 Garden Ave N Renton, WA 98057 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1(360)428-5810 Tree 419 Fair to Good FairOak6.8 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Medium Structural Pruning Recommendations Quercus species If this tree is retained prune for structure.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 6.88.0 Tree 420 Fair FairOak5.5 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Medium Structural Pruning Recommendations Quercus species If this tree is retained prune for structure. This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 5.56.5 11 Tree Assessment Matrix Bay West Company 800 Garden Ave N Renton, WA 98057 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1(360)428-5810 Tree 421 Fair to Good FairLinden8.4 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Medium Structural Pruning Recommendations Tilia species If this tree is retained prune for structure.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 8.414.5 Tree 422 Fair to Good FairOak8.9 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Low Recommendations Quercus species This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 8.913.0 12 Tree Assessment Matrix Bay West Company 800 Garden Ave N Renton, WA 98057 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1(360)428-5810 Tree 423 Fair to Good Fair to GoodWhite fir 9.5 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Medium Recommendations Abies concolor Insect attack in the lower trunk causing sap flow on the lower trunk.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 9.59.0 Tree 424 Fair to Good Fair to GoodWhite fir 5.0 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Medium Recommendations Abies concolor Foliage has a pale and yellow appearance.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 5.05.0 13 Tree Assessment Matrix Bay West Company 800 Garden Ave N Renton, WA 98057 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1(360)428-5810 Tree 425 Fair to Good FairLinden9.2 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Medium Structural Pruning Recommendations Tilia species If retained this tree should be prune for structure.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 9.2 Tree 426 Fair to Good FairCallery pear var.3.0 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Low Recommendations Prunus calleryana var.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 3.04.7 14 Tree Assessment Matrix Bay West Company 800 Garden Ave N Renton, WA 98057 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1(360)428-5810 Tree 427 Fair to Good FairOak8.7 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Low Recommendations Quercus species This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 8.79.7 Tree 428 Fair to Good FairOak9.3 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Low Recommendations Quercus species This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 9.39.7 15 Tree Assessment Matrix Bay West Company 800 Garden Ave N Renton, WA 98057 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1(360)428-5810 Tree 429 Fair to Good FairOak9.3 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Low Recommendations Quercus species This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 9.312.5 Tree 430 Fair to Good FairOak7.3 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Low Recommendations Quercus species This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 7.311.0 16 Tree Assessment Matrix Bay West Company 800 Garden Ave N Renton, WA 98057 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1(360)428-5810 Tree 431 Fair Fair to GoodWestern white pine 12.9 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Medium Recommendations Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 12.912.9 Tree 432 Fair FairWestern white pine 13.8 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Low Recommendations Pinus monticola The trunk of this tree has two codominant branches that form into two main codominant leaders.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 13.812.9 17 Tree Assessment Matrix Bay West Company 800 Garden Ave N Renton, WA 98057 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1(360)428-5810 Tree 433 Fair FairOak5.5 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Low Recommendations Quercus species This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 5.58.0 Tree 434 Fair to Good FairOak4.7 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Low Recommendations Quercus species This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 4.76.5 18 Tree Assessment Matrix Bay West Company 800 Garden Ave N Renton, WA 98057 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1(360)428-5810 Tree 435 Fair Fair to GoodWestern white pine 9.9 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Medium Recommendations Pinus monticola Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 9.95.7 Tree 436 Fair to Good Fair to GoodWhite fir 12.3 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Medium Recommendations Abies concolor Standard form.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 12.37.7 19 Tree Assessment Matrix Bay West Company 800 Garden Ave N Renton, WA 98057 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1(360)428-5810 Tree 437 Fair to Good Fair to GoodWhite fir 9.0 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Medium Recommendations Abies concolor Blue form.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 9.07.7 Tree 438 Fair to Good Fair to GoodWhite fir 9.1 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Medium Recommendations Abies concolor Blue form.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 9.17.7 20 Tree Assessment Matrix Bay West Company 800 Garden Ave N Renton, WA 98057 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1(360)428-5810 Tree 439 Fair to Good Fair to GoodWhite fir 12.1 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Medium Recommendations Abies concolor Blue form.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 12.17.7 Tree 440 Fair to Good FairOak7.9 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Medium Recommendations Quercus species This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 7.910.5 21 Tree Assessment Matrix Bay West Company 800 Garden Ave N Renton, WA 98057 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1(360)428-5810 Tree 441 Fair FairOak8.5 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Medium Recommendations Quercus species This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 8.510.5 Tree 442 Fair FairOak6.2 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Medium Recommendations Quercus species This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 6.210.5 22 Tree Assessment Matrix Bay West Company 800 Garden Ave N Renton, WA 98057 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1(360)428-5810 Tree 443 Fair FairOak8.8 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Medium Recommendations Quercus species This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 8.811.0 Tree 444 Fair FairOak7.8 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Medium Recommendations Quercus species This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 7.810.5 23 Tree Assessment Matrix Bay West Company 800 Garden Ave N Renton, WA 98057 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1(360)428-5810 Tree 445 Fair FairOak9.5 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Medium Recommendations Quercus species This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 9.510.5 Tree 446 Fair to Good Fair to GoodWestern white pine 8.5 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Low Recommendations Pinus monticola This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 8.59.5 24 Tree Assessment Matrix Bay West Company 800 Garden Ave N Renton, WA 98057 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1(360)428-5810 Tree 447 Fair to Good FairOak8.7 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Medium Recommendations Quercus species This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 8.712.5 Tree 448 Fair to Good FairOak7.3 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Medium Recommendations Quercus species This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 7.312.5 25 Tree Assessment Matrix Bay West Company 800 Garden Ave N Renton, WA 98057 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1(360)428-5810 Tree 449 Fair to Good FairOak5.0 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Medium Recommendations Quercus species This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 5.012.5 Tree 450 Fair to Good FairOak4.0 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Medium Recommendations Quercus species This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 4.012.5 26 Tree Assessment Matrix Bay West Company 800 Garden Ave N Renton, WA 98057 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1(360)428-5810 Tree 451 Fair to Good FairOak8.5 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Medium Recommendations Quercus species This tree has been planted and is growing under overhead lines, high voltage. Tree removal and replacement may be required if this tree is planned for retention.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 8.512.5 Tree 452 Fair FairJapanese snowbell 2.6 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Low Recommendations Styrax japonicus The crown of this tree does not appear to have grown to normal proportions, appearing slightly stunted and thin in terms of branch density.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 2.62.5 27 Tree Assessment Matrix Bay West Company 800 Garden Ave N Renton, WA 98057 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1(360)428-5810 Tree 453 Fair FairJapanese snowbell 4.7 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Low Recommendations Styrax japonicus This tree has a long 3 foot lower trunk injury. The crown of this tree does not appear to have grown to normal proportions, appearing slightly stunted and thin in terms of branch density.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 4.72.5 Tree 454 Fair FairJapanese snowbell 3.5 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Low Recommendations Styrax japonicus The crown of this tree does not appear to have grown to normal proportions, appearing slightly stunted and thin in terms of branch density. Not the trunk of this tree has a bend, giving this tree the appearance of a lean and malformed structure.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 3.52.9 28 Tree Assessment Matrix Bay West Company 800 Garden Ave N Renton, WA 98057 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1(360)428-5810 Tree 455 Fair FairJapanese snowbell 2.7 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Low Recommendations Styrax japonicus The trunk of this tree has a long 2-1/2 foot trunk injury. The crown of this tree does not appear to have grown to normal proportions, appearing slightly stunted and thin in terms of branch density.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 2.72.5 Tree 456 Fair FairJapanese snowbell 2.5 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Low Recommendations Styrax japonicus This tree has a long 2 foot section of trunk die-back on lower trunk. This may be a response to reflected heat from the surrounding asphalt. The crown of this tree does not appear to have grown to normal proportions, appearing slightly stunted and thin in terms of branch density.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 2.52.5 29 Tree Assessment Matrix Bay West Company 800 Garden Ave N Renton, WA 98057 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1(360)428-5810 Tree 457 Fair FairJapanese snowbell 2.7 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Low Recommendations Styrax japonicus This tree has a long 2 foot section of trunk die-back on lower trunk. This may be a response to reflected heat from the surrounding asphalt. The crown of this tree does not appear to have grown to normal proportions, appearing slightly stunted and thin in terms of branch density.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 2.72.5 Tree 458 Fair FairJapanese snowbell 3.2 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Low Recommendations Styrax japonicus This tree has multiple trunk injuries, small in size. I noticed some branch failure, possibly from vehicle(s) striking tree branches.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 3.22.5 30 Tree Assessment Matrix Bay West Company 800 Garden Ave N Renton, WA 98057 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1(360)428-5810 Tree 459 Fair Poor to FairJapanese snowbell 3.6 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Low Recommendations Styrax japonicus This tree has trunk die-back, aligned vertically on the west face of the trunk. Fruiting bodies (decay fungi) are visible in the section of affected trunk.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 3.62.5 31 Tree Assessment Matrix ASSESSOR: ASSESSMENT DATE: TELEPHONE: 1(360)428-5810 BAY WEST DEVELOPMENT 800 Garden Ave N Renton, Wa 98057 1/26/2021 Thompson. P. H. 3/11/2021 Main Office: 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1 (360) 428 5810 www.bartlett.com/bartlett-consulting.cfm Satellite Office: 19331 21st Avenue West Lynnwood, WA 98036 1 (206) 367 4048 1 Tree Assessment Matrix Bay West Development 800 Garden Ave N Renton, WA 98057 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1(360)428-5810 Tree 460 Fair Poor to FairLinden7.1 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Low Recommendations Tilia species The lower 5 feet and 20% of the circumference on the trunk of this tree is dead, with sunken cracked bark, and fruiting bodies (decay fungi) on it. The lower trunk at the soil line contains decay and a small cavity. This condition is reflected in the structure and preservation values of this tree.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 7.17.5 Tree 461 Fair FairLinden6.5 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Medium Recommendations Tilia species Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 6.58.0 2 Tree Assessment Matrix Bay West Development 800 Garden Ave N Renton, WA 98057 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1(360)428-5810 Tree 462 Fair FairLinden5.5 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Medium Recommendations Tilia species I noticed that this tree has some basal sprouts; typically these develop on this species following injury.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 5.57.5 Tree 463 Fair FairLinden6.1 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Medium Recommendations Tilia species I noticed that this tree has some basal sprouts; typically these develop on this species following injury.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 6.17.5 3 Tree Assessment Matrix Bay West Development 800 Garden Ave N Renton, WA 98057 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1(360)428-5810 Tree 464 Fair FairLinden4.0 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Medium Recommendations Tilia species This tree has a lower basal injury, measuring approximately 6” x 4-1/2” on the northeast side of the trunk.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 4.07.5 Tree 465 Fair FairCallery pear var.3.7 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Medium Recommendations Prunus calleryana var. Some die-back observed in one of the leaders of this tree. However, due to the condition of the remaining crown I still rate the vigor of this tree as fair.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 3.73.0 4 Tree Assessment Matrix Bay West Development 800 Garden Ave N Renton, WA 98057 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1(360)428-5810 Tree 466 Fair FairCallery pear var.3.6 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Medium Recommendations Prunus calleryana var. Some minor die-back is noticeable in the crown of this tree.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 3.63.0 Tree 467 Fair to Good FairLinden6.2 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Medium Recommendations Tilia species This tree has basal sprouts. I noticed a basal trunk injury on west side of the lower trunk; measuring 6” x 2”, with some decay present.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 6.27.0 5 Tree Assessment Matrix Bay West Development 800 Garden Ave N Renton, WA 98057 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1(360)428-5810 Tree 468 Fair to Good FairLinden5.5 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Low Recommendations Tilia species This tree has basal sprouts. I noticed a basal trunk injury on west side of the lower trunk,measuring 5’ x 4”; some decay associated with this injury is present.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 5.57.5 Tree 469 Fair to Good Fair to GoodLinden5.8 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Low Recommendations Tilia species This tree has basal sprouts.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 5.87.5 6 Tree Assessment Matrix Bay West Development 800 Garden Ave N Renton, WA 98057 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1(360)428-5810 Tree 470 Fair to Good Fair to GoodLinden5.8 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Low Recommendations Tilia species This tree has basal sprouts.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 5.87.5 Tree 471 Fair to Good FairLinden5.9 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Low Crown clean prune. Recommendations Tilia species This tree has broken branches, and lodged and hanging branches and a dead long section on the west face of the trunk, 4 feet in length. This condition is reflected in this trees fair structure rating.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 5.97.5 7 Tree Assessment Matrix Bay West Development 800 Garden Ave N Renton, WA 98057 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1(360)428-5810 Tree 472 Fair to Good FairLinden5.9 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Low Recommendations Tilia species This tree has basal sprouts.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 5.97.5 Tree 473 Fair to Good FairLinden6.5 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Low Recommendations Tilia species This tree has basal sprouts.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 6.57.5 8 Tree Assessment Matrix Bay West Development 800 Garden Ave N Renton, WA 98057 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1(360)428-5810 Tree 474 Fair FairCallery pear var.3.6 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Low Recommendations Prunus calleryana var. I noted some minor die-back in upper branches and leaders of this tree. This state of vigor is reflected in the fair rating.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 3.64.0 Tree 475 Fair FairCallery pear var.4.0 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Low Recommendations Prunus calleryana var. I noted some minor die-back in the upper branches and leaders of this tree. This state of vigor is reflected in the fair rating.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 4.03.3 9 Tree Assessment Matrix Bay West Development 800 Garden Ave N Renton, WA 98057 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1(360)428-5810 Tree 476 Fair FairLinden5.7 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Low Recommendations Tilia species This tree has basal sprouts. The crown contains small broken branches.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 5.77.8 Tree 477 Fair FairLinden5.3 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Low Recommendations Tilia species This tree has basal sprouts. This tree has been badly pruned.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 5.37.8 10 Tree Assessment Matrix Bay West Development 800 Garden Ave N Renton, WA 98057 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1(360)428-5810 Tree 478 Fair FairLinden6.1 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Low Recommendations Tilia species This tree has basal sprouts. This tree has been badly pruned.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 6.17.8 Tree 479 Fair FairLinden4.9 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Low Recommendations Tilia species This tree has basal sprouts. This tree has been badly pruned.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 4.96.9 11 Tree Assessment Matrix Bay West Development 800 Garden Ave N Renton, WA 98057 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1(360)428-5810 Tree 480 Fair FairLinden5.9 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Low Recommendations Tilia species This tree has basal sprouts. This tree has been badly pruned.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 5.97.7 Tree 481 Fair Fair to GoodWestern white pine 8.6 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Medium Recommendations Pinus monticola This tree lacks an apical dominant structure typical of this species. It is therefor possible that this tree is a cultivar, developed to have a smaller form.Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 8.69.3 12 Tree Assessment Matrix Bay West Development 800 Garden Ave N Renton, WA 98057 15119 McLean Road Mount Vernon, WA 98273 1(360)428-5810 Tree 482 Poor Poor to FairJapanese snowbell 2.7 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Hazard or Dead Recommendations Styrax japonicus Declining health, with cambium die-back, and dead branching in the upper crown. This is reflected in this trees preservation value of 'hazard or dead.'Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 2.72.5 Tree 483 Poor Poor to FairJapanese snowbell 3.5 Species Dia. (in)Crown (ft)Health Structure Risk Low Pres. Value Hazard or Dead Recommendations Styrax japonicus Declining health, with cambium die-back, and fungal fruiting bodies in the lower 3 feet of trunk. This is reflected in this trees preservation value of 'hazard or dead.'Notes/DefectsCRZ (ft) 3.52.7 13 Tree Risk Assessment Definitions Page 1 of 5 2021 © The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company Tree Risk Assessment Definitions The scientific study of tree failure is not an exact science; there is still much to learn. Most limitations of tree risk assessment arise from uncertainties with trees and the loads they are subjected to. The three levels of tree risk assessment, as defined in the International Society of Arboriculture’s (ISA) Best Management Practices for Tree Risk Assessment and ANSI A300 Tree Risk Assessment Standard are described below along with the basic limitations of each. The three levels of tree risk assessment are described below: I. Level 1 Limited Visual Assessment: A Level 1 Limited Visual Assessment is a visual assessment from a specific perspective of an individual tree or a population of trees near specified targets. These assessments are conducted to identify obvious defects or specified conditions (as defined in the International Society of Arboriculture’s (ISA) Best Management Practices for Tree Risk Assessment and ANSI A300 Tree Risk Assessment Standard). A Level 1 Limited Visual Assessment is typically performed from one specified perspective (i.e. from the sidewalk, street, parking lot, wood line, etc.), and typically of one side of the tree from that specified perspective. The specified tree or trees are visually assessed to identify obvious defects or specific conditions (i.e. dead trees, large cavities, large dead branches, etc.) that result in a likelihood of failure of probable or imminent and would impact the specified target(s). Level 1 Limited visual assessments are typically performed to quickly assess large populations of trees to identify trees with the highest likelihood of failure ratings in the population, or trees that are recommended for higher level of assessment. A Level 1 Limited Visual Assessment typically includes: 1. Identifying the location and/or selection criteria of trees to be assessed. 2. Determining the most efficient route and document the route taken. 3. Assessing the tree(s) of concern from the defined perspective (e.g. walk-by, drive-by). 4. Recording the location of trees that meet the defined criteria (e.g. significant defects or other conditions of concern). 5. Evaluating the risk (a risk rating is optional). 6. Identifying trees needing a higher level of assessment (Level 2 Basic or Level 3 Advanced) and/or prompt action. 7. Submitting risk mitigation recommendations and/or report. Limitations: Level 1 Limited Visual Assessments are the least thorough means of assessment, some conditions may not be visible from the one-sided inspection, not all conditions are visible at all times of the year, and may not be adequate enough to make a risk mitigation recommendation. Residual risk designations for trees are not included. Tree Risk Assessment Definitions Page 2 of 5 2021 © The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company II. Level 2 Basic Assessment: A Level 2 Basic Assessment is a detailed visual inspection of a tree and its surrounding site, and a synthesis of the information collected. It requires complete inspection around a tree including the site, visible buttress roots, trunk, and branches (as defined in the International Society of Arboriculture’s (ISA) Best Management Practices for Tree Risk Assessment and ANSI A300 Tree Risk Assessment Standard). A Level 2 Basic Assessment typically incorporates most aspects of a Level 1 Limited Visual Assessment. A Level 2 Basic Assessment is a detailed visual inspection of tree(s) and surroundings, where all sides of the tree(s) is visually assessed from the ground. The crown, branches, trunk, and buttress roots of the specified trees are all assessed to identify visual defects or specific conditions (i.e. dead trees, large cavities, large dead branches, etc.). A Level 2 Basic Assessment may include the use of tools such as a mallet, binoculars, or a probe. Recommendations for trees that need a higher level of assessment are typically included. A Level 2 Basic Assessment typically includes: 1. Locating and identifying the tree or trees to be assessed. 2. Determining the targets and target zone for the tree or branches of concern. 3. Reviewing the site history and conditions, and species failure profile. 4. Assessing potential load on the tree and its parts. 5. Assessing general tree health. 6. Inspecting the tree visually and using binoculars, mallet, probes, or shovels, as desired by the arborist or as specified in the Scope of Work. 7. Record observations of site condition, defects, and outward signs of possible internal defects, response growth. 8. If necessary, recommending a Level 3 Advanced assessment. 9. Analyzing data to determine the likelihood and consequences of failure in order to evaluate the degree of risk. 10. Develop mitigation options and estimate residual risk for each option. 11. Develop and submit the report/documentation, including, when appropriate, advice on re-inspection intervals. Limitations: Level 2 Basic Assessments only include conditions and defects that can be detected from a ground-based inspection on the day of the assessment and internal, belowground, or upper-crown conditions or defects, and certain types of decay, may be impossible to detect or assess and may remain undetected. Tree Risk Assessment Definitions Page 3 of 5 2021 © The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company III. Level 3 Advanced Assessment: A Level 3 Advanced Assessment is performed to provide detailed information about specific tree parts, defects, targets, or site conditions. These are usually conducted in conjunction with or after a Level 2 Basic Assessment with client approval. Specialized equipment, data collection and analysis, and/or expertise are usually required for these advanced assessments (as defined in the International Society of Arboriculture’s (ISA) Best Management Practices for Tree Risk Assessment and ANSI A300 Tree Risk Assessment Standard). A Level 3 Advanced Assessment typically incorporates most aspects of a Level 2 Basic Assessment. A Level 3 Advanced Assessment is typically a recommendation based on specific defects or conditions identified in a Level 2 Basic Assessment. A Level 3 Advanced Assessment provides detailed information about a specific tree part, and typically include the use of specialized equipment. Recommendations for other advanced assessments or the use of additional advanced assessment equipment or techniques may be included. A Level 3 Advanced Assessment typically includes: 1. Locating and identifying the tree or trees to be assessed. 2. Determining the targets and target zone for the tree or branches of concern. 3. Reviewing the site history and conditions, and species failure profile. 4. Assessing potential load on the tree and its parts. 5. Assessing general tree health. 6. Inspecting the tree using advanced techniques as desired by the arborist or as specified in the Scope of Work. 7. Record observations of site condition, defects, outward signs of possible internal defects, response growth, and results from advanced techniques. 8. Analyzing data to determine the likelihood and consequences of failure in order to evaluate the degree of risk. 9. Develop mitigation options and estimate residual risk for each option. 10. Develop and submit the report/documentation, including, when appropriate, advice on re-inspection intervals. Tree Risk Assessment Definitions Page 4 of 5 2021 © The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company Level 3 Advanced assessment techniques can include: Procedure Methodology Aerial inspection and evaluation of structural defects in high stems and branches • Visual inspection from within the tree crown or from a lift • Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) photographic inspection • Decay testing of branches Detailed target analysis • Property value • Use and occupancy statistics • Potential disruption of activities Detailed site evaluation • History evaluation • Soil profile inspection to determine root depth • Soil mineral and structural testing Decay testing • Increment boring • Drilling with small-diameter bit • Resistance-recording drilling • Single path sonic (stress) wave • Sonic tomography • Electrical impedance tomography • Radiation (radar, X-ray) • Microscopic analysis for fungal type Health evaluation • Tree ring analysis (in temperate zone trees) • Shoot length measurement • Detailed health/vigor analysis • Starch assessment Root inspection and evaluation • Root and root collar excavation • Root decay evaluation • Ground-penetrating radar Storm/wind load analysis • Detailed assessment of tree exposure and protection • Computer-basedestimations according to engineering models • Wind reaction monitoring over a defined interval Measuring and assessing the change in trunk lean • Visual documentation • Digital level Load testing • Hand pull • Measured static pull • Measured tree dynamics Limitations: Level 3 Advanced Assessments and evaluations using the technologies Tree Risk Assessment Definitions Page 5 of 5 2021 © The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company listed above are qualified estimations, not exact measures. Note: All levels of tree risk assessments consider visible and detectable tree conditions in proximity to the significant known and/or assigned targets of the tree or trees being assessed. Regardless of the level selected, any tree risk assessment will be limited to the tree or trees selected, and the detectable conditions at the time of the visual assessment. The client should also recognize that not all defects will be detectable, and not all failures can be predictable. General Terms for Commercial Consulting Services Page 1 of 6 The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company (“Bartlett Tree Experts”) provides tree-care and related consulting services to commercial and government clients. The agreed upon “Work” has been expressed in a separate Client Agreement between Bartlett Tree Experts and the Client, and is identified within the portion of the Client Agreement communicating the Scope of the Work, the Goals, the Specifications, the Schedule of the Work, and the Payment Terms. These general terms combine with the approved Client Agreement and form the complete agreement between the parties. Article 1 TREE RISK 1.1 Tree Risk (a) The Client acknowledges that having trees on one’s property involves risk, including the risk that a tree or tree limb might fall. As part of the Work, Bartlett Tree Experts may recognize the risk posed by failure of trees within the Scope of Work and recommend to the Client ways to reduce that risk, but the Client acknowledges that Bartlett Tree Experts cannot detect all defects and other conditions that present the risk of tree failure and cannot predict how all trees will respond to future events and circumstances. Trees can fail unpredictably, even if no defects or other conditions are apparent. Bartlett Tree Experts will not be responsible for damages caused by subsequent failure of a tree, or tree part, within or around the Scope of Work due to defects or other preexisting structural or health conditions. (b) Unless the Work includes having Bartlett Tree Experts perform a tree risk assessment for designated trees, the Client acknowledges that in performing the Work Bartlett Tree Experts is not required to inspect and report to the Client on risks to, and risks posed by, trees on or near the Client’s property. (c) The Client also acknowledges that because trees are living organisms that change over time, the best protection against the risk associated with having trees on the Client’s property is for the Client to arrange to have them inspected by a qualified arborist annually and after each major weather event to identify any defects or other conditions that present the risk of tree failure. Then, once inspected, the Client should review any possible defects or conditions that present the risk of failure and request recommendations for, and implement, remedial actions to mitigate the risks. Article 2 THE WORK 2.1 Ownership The Client states that all trees and other vegetation within the Scope of Work are owned by the Client or that the Owner has authorized the Client to include them within the Scope of Work. 2.2 Specified Trees or Work The specific trees, shrubs, plant materials or work described in the Scope of Work or in the Agreement will be the only trees, shrubs, plant materials, or work included in the scope of the consultative services or Work performed by Bartlett for the Client. 2.3 Insurance (a) Bartlett Tree Experts states that it is insured for liability resulting from injury to persons or damage to property while performing the Work and that its employees are covered under workers’ compensation laws. (b) The scope of ongoing operations of the Work shall be defined as beginning when the performance on the site begins and ending when the performance on the site concludes. 2.4 Compliance Bartlett Tree Experts shall perform the Work competently and in compliance with the law and industry standards, including the American National Standards Institute’s A-300 Standards for tree care. 2.5 Access Over Roads, Driveways, and Walkways The Client shall arrange for Bartlett Tree Experts’ representatives, vehicles, and equipment to have access during working hours to areas where the Work is to be performed. The Client shall keep roads, driveways, and walkways in those areas clear during working hours for the passage and parking of vehicles and equipment. Unless the Client Agreement states otherwise, Bartlett Tree Experts is not required to keep gates closed for animals or children. 2.6 Personnel Bartlett Tree Experts will determine and provide the correct Bartlett personnel for completing the Work based scope of the project, the expertise needed, and the geographic location of the work, in order to meet the goals of the Client. 2.7 Accuracy of Information Provided By the Client or By Third Parties Acting on Behalf of the Client (a) The Client acknowledges that Bartlett Tree Experts cannot be held responsible for the accuracy of or content of information provided by the Client or third parties acting on behalf of the Client, including but not limited to; the legal description of the property, issues of title and/or ownership of the property, software programs, property and property line locations and/or boundaries, or other pieces of information provided which are integral to the final outcome of the consulting Work. (b) The Client agrees to correct any errors in any such inaccurate information that it or any third party acting on its behalf, provides Bartlett Tree Experts, once the inaccuracy is known, if such information will be necessary for Bartlett Tree Experts to base its final analysis, management plans, written reports, information or recommendations on for the finalization of the Work. 2.8 Information Provided By Reliable Sources In certain circumstances, Bartlett Tree Experts may need to engage outside reliable sources to provide specialized information, cost estimates, or opinions. Bartlett Tree Experts will make every effort to engage reputable and reliable sources, and will communicate the use of these sources to the Client if such sources are used to help determine an integral part of the Work. 2.9 Tree Locations, Maps, Sketches, and Diagrams The Client acknowledges that Bartlett Tree Experts may use several means and methods to provide tree locations on maps, General Terms for Commercial Consulting Services Page 2 of 6 The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company sketches, or drawings, and that the use of tree locations on maps, sketches, diagrams, and/or in pictures are intended to aid the Client in understanding the deliverables provided, and may not be to scale and should not be considered precise locations, engineering surveys, or architectural drawings. 2.10 Global Positioning Systems The Client acknowledges that all global positioning system (GPS) devices used to locate trees, shrubs, and plant material, have some accuracy limitations, and regardless of the methodologies or software programs used to enhance the accuracy of the locations, there will always be some level of meter or sub meter locational discrepancies within any deliverable product. 2.11 Advice, Opinions, Conclusions, and Recommendations (a) The Client Acknowledges that all advice, opinions, conclusions, and recommendations provided represent the professional objective opinion(s) of Bartlett Tree Experts; which are in no way predetermined, or biased toward any particular outcome. (b) The Client acknowledges that all advice, opinions, conclusions, and recommendations provided verbally or in written format such as email, management plans, or reports will be based on the present status of the tree(s), property(s), environmental conditions, and industry standards. Any advice, opinions, conclusions, and recommendations provided do not take into account any future changes in environmental conditions or changes to current industry standards which are unknown and unforeseen at the time the Work is performed. 2.12 Tree Risk Assessments and Inventories (a) If the Client Agreement is specifically for Bartlett Tree Experts to provide a Level 1 Limited Visual, Level 2 Basic, or Level 3 Advanced assessment of tree risk for any tree or group of trees for the Client in accordance with industry standards, the Client understands that any risk ratings and recommendations for mitigating such risks will be based on the observed defects, conditions, and factors at the time of the tree risk assessment or inventory. (b) The Client acknowledges that any recommendations made to mitigate risk factors will be made in accordance with industry best practices and standards, but that the decision to implement the recommended mitigation or remove the risk factors rests solely with the Client. (c) The Client understands that all risk ratings used are intended to assist the Client with understanding the potential for tree or tree part failure, and are not meant to be used to declare any tree or tree part to be safe or free from any defect. As such, the Client should not infer that any tree not identified as having an imminent or probable likelihood of failure, or not identified with a moderate, high, or extreme risk rating, or not having a condition rating of poor or dead is “safe” or will not fail in any manner. (d) The Client understands that it is the Client’s responsibility to ensure that the assessed tree or trees are continually inspected and reassessed periodically, or after any major weather event, in order to ensure that risk rating information is kept current, and to enter any changes to risk ratings or mitigation measures to the inventory or tracking system used by the Client. 2.13 Tree or Plant Value Appraisals (a) The Client acknowledges that tree appraisal is not an exact science. If the Client Agreement is for Bartlett Tree Experts to provide the Client with an appraisal estimate of cost or value, or estimated tree asset value, for specified trees or plant materials, the Client understands that those estimates will be based on a combination of visible conditions at the time of appraisal, information or pictures provided by the Client, local knowledge, information and/or cost estimates provided by local nurseries or plant wholesalers, information and/or costs provided by tree care or landscape installation and maintenance companies, industry best practices, and/or asset value software. (b) The Client understands that while any such appraisal will be based on one or several accepted industry methods of appraising plant material values, the appraised values provided may or may not be accepted as the final value by third parties, or decision makers in disputes over plant values, such as courts, arbitrators, insurers, or mediation efforts. 2.14 Local and Tree-Related Permits Unless the Client Agreement states differently, the Client is responsible for obtaining and paying for all required local or tree related permits required. If the Work stated in the Client Agreement involves Bartlett Tree Experts submitting for, or assisting the Client in submitting for, any kind of local or tree-related permit, the Client understands that Bartlett Tree Experts cannot guarantee the successful outcome. If Bartlett Tree Experts submits a local or tree permit application on behalf of the Client, the Client must provide all necessary information for Bartlett to make such a submittal, and the Client will be responsible for paying for, or reimbursing Bartlett Tree Experts for, all fees and expenses related to the application process, regardless of the outcome. 2.15 Expert Witness and Testimony The Client acknowledges that unless the Scope of Work in Client Agreement is specifically to perform Expert Witness services and testimony for the Client, then nothing in the Client Agreement will obligate Bartlett Tree Experts to perform Expert Witness services or provide expert testimony for or on behalf of the Client. 2.16 Environmental Benefits Assessments (a) The Client understands that Bartlett Tree Experts may use one or more software, or other programs, developed by other companies or government agencies, which are designed to help provide estimates on the environmental benefits of trees, shrubs, or other plant materials if the Work involves providing an environmental benefit assessment for the Client. (b) The Client acknowledges that while Bartlett Tree Experts will be responsible for the correct collection and input of data into any such software or other program used to help estimate environmental benefits of trees, shrubs, and other plant materials, the determinations of the data made by any such program may vary based on the method, software, type, year, or version used at any given time. The Client understands that any such method, software, type, year, or version used is meant to provide a sound, scientific method to help the Client understand the environmental benefits of the collected data. 2.17 Tree and Property Hazards and Safety Issues The Client understands that in no way does Bartlett Tree Experts imply, nor should the Client infer that Bartlett Tree General Terms for Commercial Consulting Services Page 3 of 6 The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company Experts assumes the responsibility for inspecting, identifying, and correcting tree or property hazards or safety issues on or near the Client’s property, or conducting tree risk assessments, for which the Client Agreement does not specify, during the course of any of its ongoing consultative or other activities related to this Agreement. 2.18 Remote Sensing and Tree Canopy Assessments (a) If the Work requires Bartlett Tree Experts to evaluate aerial imagery to classify land cover classes, classify random points, or create or manipulate shapefile boundaries, the Client understands that certain factors can prohibit the accuracy of the final Work product, such as; the availability of imagery, files, and shapefiles for the property or site from reliable sources, the accuracy and quality of imagery, files, or shapefiles obtained from reliable sources or provided by the Client, the date of when the imagery, files, or shapefiles were taken or created, and the ability for a person to visually discern the difference between the pixels of aerial imagery. (b) If such factors inhibit the accuracy of the Work, Bartlett Tree Experts may choose to conduct visual assessments, or use other means, to verify or classify points or imagery into the required specifications. If such alternate methods are used, Bartlett Tree Experts will communicate the use of such methods to the Client in the final work product. If it is not possible or feasible to use alternative methods, then the Client acknowledges that the final work product may have some gaps in accuracy. 2.19 Use of Drones and Drone-Related Equipment (a) If the Work specifies the use of Drones or Drone-related equipment to help collect information, the Client acknowledges that in some cases the use of Drones and Drone-related equipment can provide detailed information, imagery, views, and pictures of a tree(s) or property(s); however, in some cases, not all aspects of a tree(s) or property(s) can be seen or accessed by a Drone. The Client understands that this technology can be limited and should not be used by the Client as the sole decision-making criteria, but rather one of many factors used by the Client in the decision-making process. (b) The Client agrees that other methods of obtaining the required information must be included in the Client Agreement, and may be required to be utilized, in addition to or separate from the use of Drones or Drone related equipment in the event that the limitations are too severe to perform the required Work. 2.20 Decay Detection Devices (a) The Client acknowledges that all decay detecting devices have limitations, and the use of any such device should be used to supplement information regarding the decay within a tree or trees, and not as the sole source of information. (b) If the Work requires the use of a decay detection device, unless the Client Agreement specifies the type of device, Bartlett Tree Experts will decide the most appropriate type of decay detecting device to use based on the conditions present and the information needed to supplement and complete the Work. 2.21 Diagnostic Services Bartlett Tree Experts may offer diagnostic services as a means of attempting to isolate certain plant pest or soil problems for the Client, and determining the most logical possibility as to the cause of the condition of the trees, shrubs, or plants in question. The Client understands that in some cases government quarantines may prohibit samples from being sent to a diagnostic clinic, and in some cases, determinations on samples may be inconclusive. 2.22 Tree Preservation, Tree Protection, and Construction and Site Monitoring (a) If the Work includes Bartlett Tree Experts conducting or providing tree preservation or tree protection evaluations, tree impact evaluations, recommendations, specifications, and/or documents required by the governing agency, the Client understands that Bartlett Tree Experts will review the project, materials or plans that are provided by the Client, combined with industry best practices and current tree conditions, to arrive at the recommendations and specifications. The Client also understands that trees are living organisms and that even following all industry best practices and specifications cannot guarantee that a tree will survive construction impacts, which may include but are not limited to soil compaction, root damage, inadequate soil moisture, and decrease in tree stability. (b) If the Work includes Bartlett Tree Experts conducting or providing tree monitoring during project construction, the Client understands that Bartlett Tree Experts will review the project, materials, or plans that are provided by the Client and/or described by the Client representative at the site, and provide recommendations to the Client to assist with tree preservation or protection, but that the Client will be responsible for ensuring the implementation of such recommendations by the Client or any third parties. 2.23 Irrigation and Recycled Water Assessments (a) If the Work requires Bartlett Tree Experts to provide irrigation or recycled water assessments as a means of aiding the Client with their tree care needs, the assessments will be provided using the best known site conditions, the best available water quality information, or the best available water quality test results provided to Bartlett Tree Experts; however, the Client acknowledges that Bartlett Tree Experts cannot provide information on water source, delivery systems, water chemistry, water quality testing methodology, or distribution systems. 2.24 Bird, Water Fowl, and Wildlife Habitat Assessments If the Work requires Bartlett Tree Experts to provide bird, water fowl, and wildlife habitat assessments or identifications as a means of aiding the Client with their tree care needs and wildlife considerations, the assessments will be based on known site conditions and available industry bird, waterfowl, and wildlife management information. 2.25 Endangered or Protected Species and Habitats (a) If the Work is for Bartlett Tree Experts to identify trees or plant materials that may be endangered or protected species, or to identify trees or plant materials that may be primary or secondary habitat for endangered or protected species, or to provide any analysis for a project that may affect any endangered species or protected species or its habitat, then Bartlett Tree Experts will base all reports and information on the existence of any known endangered or protected species and known habitats using government approved endangered or protected species or habitat information. (b) The Client acknowledges that Bartlett Tree Experts cannot be responsible for identifying unknown endangered species or habitats. General Terms for Commercial Consulting Services Page 4 of 6 The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company 2.26 Wetland and Riparian Habitat Mapping The Client understands that if the Work involves wetland or riparian habitat mapping, such maps will require the Client to provide the tree or plant species considered to be the primary or secondary habitat for the specific species of animal in question, and such maps will be limited to the species information provided as it overlays within the known designated wetland areas. 2.27 Representation Services If the Work involves a member of Bartlett Tree Experts acting as a representative for, or decision-maker for, the Client, including but not limited to activities such as reviewing, approving or declining tree-related permits, plants, designs, or selections submitted by third parties, then the Client agrees to be the final decision-maker in the event of a third party appeal of an adverse decision or recommendation made by Bartlett Tree Experts with respect to granting or denying a tree related permit, plant, design, or selection submitted by a third party. The Client also agrees to defend Bartlett Tree Experts against any claims made by third parties regarding such decisions or recommendations, and represent the decisions and recommendations of Bartlett Tree Experts, as if such decisions or recommendations were made by the Client. 2.28 Integrated Pest Management (a) If the Work includes consultation for integrated pest management services, the Client understands that the final product may involve recommendations for plant health care treatments that will be tailored to meet the Client’s needs for specific trees, shrubs, turf areas, or plants. In creating these recommendations, Bartlett Tree Experts will consider the Client’s objectives, priorities, budgetary concerns, plant materials, site conditions, pest and disease infestation levels and the expectations of those levels, and timing issues. (b) The Client acknowledges that such recommendations may involve one or more inspections of specific plants to help determine insect and disease concerns, the sampling of specific plant materials or soil areas, an understanding of the cultural needs of certain plants, consideration of biological control concepts and limitations (natural and/or introduced predators), recommended improvements to physical site conditions, or the use of pesticide treatments. The integrated pest management service does not combine all possible controls and concepts for every tree, shrub, turf area, or plant, but rather it considers the most reasonable option or options for control of and mitigation of insect and disease damages to the specific trees, shrubs, turf areas or plants as designated by the Client to meet the Client’s goals. (c) The Client understands and acknowledges that during the course of an integrated pest management program, as inspections are taking place, and treatments or other services are being performed to certain trees or shrubs, not every tree or shrub inspected will require a specific treatment or other service, and in fact, some trees or shrubs may not require any specific treatment or other service throughout the course of a season to maintain health and vigor if the inspections show insignificant pest thresholds, and sound environmental and cultural conditions. (d) The Client also understands that tree, shrub, plant and turf inspections conducted during the integrated pest management program are for the purpose of determining plant health issues and, insect and disease thresholds; and are not conducted for the purposes of determining tree, shrub, plant, or turf safety. 2.29 Plant Species Selection If the Work involves Bartlett Tree Experts providing advice and guidance on plant species selection to aid the Client with their landscape site needs, Bartlett Tree Experts will provide the advice and guidance based on the known site conditions, the available plant species locally at the time, and the plant species characteristics. The Client will be responsible for the planting and maintenance, and ensuring the survival of such plant selections in the landscape. 2.30 Trees and Subsidence Assessments (a) If the Work involves Bartlett Tree Experts providing an assessment of relationship between certain trees or tree parts and the subsidence or movement of a building or structure, the Client understands that certain inferences and assumptions will be made given the location, visibility, soil and drainage conditions, size, species, and condition of the tree or trees, and other factors, in order to perform the Work in the least intrusive manner possible. (b) Bartlett Tree Experts recommends that the Client reviews any tree related report recommendations, prior to having the work completed, with their structural engineer or other qualified building contractor to help the client determine any potential adverse impact to the buildings or structures. 2.31 Investigation of Covenants, Easements, Constraints, or Restrictions The Client is responsible for investigating and identifying to Bartlett Tree Experts any covenants, easements, constraints, or other restrictions to the title or deed on the property that may adversely impact Bartlett Tree Experts’ ability to perform the Work. 2.32 Cancellation If the Client cancels or reduces the Work after the Work has started, the Client shall pay Bartlett Tree Experts for all the items of the Work that have been completed and all reasonable costs Bartlett Tree Experts has incurred in preparing to perform the remainder of the Work. 2.33 Payment The Client shall pay for the Work when the Client receives Bartlett Tree Experts’ invoice for the Work, unless specific payment terms have been agreed upon by the parties. If any amount remains unpaid 30 days after the date of the invoice or any period stated in the Client Agreement, whichever is longer, as a service charge the unpaid amount will accrue interest at the rate of 1.5% per month (or 18% per year) or the maximum rate permitted by law, whichever is lower. The Client shall reimburse Bartlett Tree Experts for any expenses (including attorneys’ fees and court costs) it incurs in collecting amounts that the Client owes under the Client Agreement. Article 3 TREE CONDITIONS 3.1 Cables, Braces and Tree-Support Systems The Client acknowledges that cables, braces or tree-support systems are intended to reduce the risk associated with tree part breakage by providing supplemental support to certain areas within trees and in some cases by limiting the General Terms for Commercial Consulting Services Page 5 of 6 The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company movement of leaders, limbs, or entire trees, and are intended to mitigate the potential damage associated with tree part breakage; but that such supplemental support systems cannot eliminate the risk of breakage or failure to trees or tree parts entirely, and future breakage and damage is still possible (a) The Client acknowledges that for cables, braces or tree- support systems to function optimally, the Client must arrange for them to be inspected and maintained by a qualified arborist periodically and after each major weather event. 3.2 Lightning Protection Systems (a) The Client acknowledges that lightning protection systems are intended to direct a portion of the electricity from a lightning strike down through the system into the ground, and mitigate the potential damage to the tree from a lightning strike, but that such systems cannot prevent damage to structures, nor can such systems prevent damage to trees caused by lightning entirely. (b) The Client acknowledges that for lightning protection systems to function optimally, the Client must arrange for them to be inspected and maintained by a qualified arborist periodically and after each major weather event. 3.3 Recreational Features (a) The Client acknowledges that Bartlett Tree Experts recommends stopping the use of, and removing, any tree house, ropes course, swing, or other recreational feature attached to a tree. Regardless of the health or condition of the tree, such features might be unsuited for the intended use or might place unpredictable forces on the feature or the tree, resulting in failure of the feature or the tree and injury to persons or damage to property. Bartlett Tree Experts is not responsible for the consequences of use of any such feature. (b) The Client acknowledges that if a recommendation is made to mitigate an observed and immediate safety issue on a tree with any such device or feature attached, such as the removal of a dead, dying, or broken limb that could fall and injure a person or damage property, the Client should not infer that following the recommendation and mitigating the immediate safety issue makes the tree in question safe for the use of the attached device or feature. 3.4 Root Pruning In the right circumstances, root pruning is a valuable and necessary service, but it might pose a risk to the health and structural integrity of trees. To limit that risk, Bartlett Tree Experts performs root pruning to industry standards, but the Client acknowledges that the health and structural integrity of trees within the Scope of Work might nevertheless be adversely affected by any root pruning performed as part of the Work. Bartlett Tree Experts shall assist the Client in understanding the risks involved before opting for root pruning, but the Client will be responsible for deciding to proceed with root pruning. 3.5 Stumps, Stump Grinding, Tree Grates The Client acknowledges that if any recommendations call for the removal of certain trees, that the remaining stumps may present tripping hazards, and that it is the Client’s responsibility to remove any such tripping hazard, whether such hazard is created by the stump, the grindings if the stump is ground down, or any tree grates that exist. 3.6 Client Trees in Hazardous Condition If the Client Agreement specifies that one or more trees within the Scope of Work are in hazardous condition, have an extreme, high or moderate risk rating, or should be removed for safety reasons, the Client acknowledges that removing those trees would prevent future damage from trees or tree limbs falling. If the Client requests that one or more of those trees be pruned instead of removed, the Client acknowledges that although pruning might reduce the immediate risk of limbs falling, it does not preclude the possibility of future limb, stem, or root failure. Bartlett Tree Experts is not responsible for any such future failure. 3.7 Trees in Poor Health or a Severe State of Decline The Client acknowledges that if a tree is in poor health or in a severe state of decline, Bartlett Tree Experts cannot predict how that tree will respond to any recommended plant health care or soil care and fertilization treatment and might not be able to prevent that tree from getting worse or dying. 3.8 Trees Planted and Maintained by Other Contractors The Client acknowledges that if trees within the Scope of Work were recently planted or are being maintained by one or more other contractors or if one or more other contractors will be watering and providing services with respect to trees within the Scope of Work, how those trees respond to treatment in the course of the Work might be unpredictable, and Bartlett Tree Experts cannot be responsible for the health of such trees or plants. 3.9 Trees with Cones and Large Seed Pods The Client acknowledges that large tree cones or seedpods on some trees can become dislodged and fall without notice, creating a hazard to persons or property. If the Client has the type of tree on their property that produces large, heavy cones or seedpods, and the Client does not wish to remove the tree, Bartlett Tree Experts recommends that the Client marks off and restricts the area under and near the tree from pedestrian and vehicle traffic whenever possible, places a warning sign near the tree, remains aware of the hazardous conditions the falling cones can create, and inspects the tree annually and removes any observable cones if possible in order to mitigate the potential for damage from falling cones. 3.10 Fire Damage (a) Regardless of the species, trees exposed to fire can suffer structural damage that goes beyond whatever external damage might be visible. Fire can cause cracking and brittleness in tree structure and integrity; it can make pre-existing defects worse; it can make roots less stable; and it can weaken the overall health of the tree, making it susceptible to disease and pest infestations. The effects of fire damage are unpredictable and difficult to determine. Bartlett Tree Experts is not responsible for any injury to persons or damage to property resulting from services performed on fire- damaged trees as part of the Work. (b) The Client acknowledges that if trees and shrubs on the Client’s property have been exposed to fire, the Client should have qualified arborist periodically inspect trees and shrubs on the property for fire damage. General Terms for Commercial Consulting Services Page 6 of 6 The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company Article 4 DISPUTE RESOLUTION 4.1 Arbitration (a) As the exclusive means of initiating adversarial proceedings to resolve any dispute arising out of or related to the Client Agreement or Bartlett Tree Experts’ performance of the Work, a party may demand that the dispute be resolved by arbitration administered by the American Arbitration Association in accordance with its commercial arbitration rules, and each party hereby consents to any such dispute being so resolved. Any arbitration commenced in accordance with this section must be conducted by one arbitrator. Judgment on any award rendered in any such arbitration may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. The parties also agree that the issue of whether any such dispute is arbitrable will be decided by an arbitrator, not a court. (b) The arbitrator must not award punitive damages in excess of compensatory damages. Each party hereby waives any right to recover any such damages in any arbitration. 4.2 Third Party Liability The Client acknowledges that the use of any management plans created, reports written, recommendations, maps, sketches, and conclusions made are for the Client’s use and are not intended to benefit or cause damage to any third party. Bartlett Tree Experts accepts no responsibility for any damages or losses suffered by any third party or by the Client as a result of decisions made or actions based upon the use of reliance of the management plans created, reports written, recommendations, maps, sketches, and conclusions made by any third party. 4.3 Limitation of Liability The maximum liability of Bartlett Tree Experts for any losses incurred by the Client arising out of the Client Agreement or Bartlett Tree Experts’ performance of the Work will be the amount paid by the Client for the Work, except in the case of negligence or intentional misconduct by Bartlett Tree Experts. Article 5 MISCELLANEOUS 5.1 Client Responsibilities (a) The Client is responsible for the maintenance of the Client’s trees, shrubs, and turf and for all decisions as to whether or not to prune, remove, or conduct other types of tree work on each respective tree, or when to prune, remove, or conduct other tree work on any respective tree, and all decisions related to the safety of each respective tree, shrub, and turf area. (b) Nothing in this Agreement creates an ongoing duty of care for Bartlett Tree Experts to provide safety maintenance or safety inspections in and around the Client’s property. It is the responsibility of the Client to ensure the safety of its trees and landscape, and to take appropriate actions to prevent any future tree or tree part breakage or failures, or otherwise remove any hazardous conditions which may be present or may develop in the future. 5.2 Severability If any portion of this Client Agreement is found to be unenforceable, then only that portion will be stricken from the Client Agreement, and the remainder of the Client Agreement will remain enforceable. 5.3 Unrelated Court Proceedings The Client acknowledges that Bartlett Tree Experts has prepared the Client Agreement solely to help the Client understand the Scope of Work and the related costs. If a court subpoenas Bartlett Tree Experts’ records regarding, or requires that a Bartlett representative testify about, the Client Agreement or the Work in connection with any Proceeding to which Bartlett Tree Experts is not a party or in connection with which Bartlett Tree Experts has not agreed to provide expert testimony, the Client shall pay Bartlett Tree Experts Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) per hour for time spent by Bartlett representatives in collecting and submitting documents for those Proceedings and attending depositions or testifying as part of those Proceedings. 5.4 Use of Information The Client acknowledges that the information provided within the Client Agreement and any deliverables provided is solely for the use of the Client for the intended purpose of helping the Client understand and manage their tree care needs. All deliverables must be used as a whole, and not separated or used separately for other purposes. 5.5 Notices For a notice or other communication under the Client Agreement to be valid, it must be in writing and delivered (1) by hand, (2) by a national transportation company (with all fees prepaid), or (3) by email. If a notice or other communication addressed to a party is received after 5:00 p.m. on a business day at the location specified for that party, or on a day that is not a business day, then the notice will be deemed received at 9:00 a.m. on the next business day. 4.4 Amendment; Waiver No amendment of the Client Agreement will be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the parties. No waiver under the Client Agreement will be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the party granting the waiver. A waiver granted on one occasion will not operate as a waiver on other occasions. 5.5 Conflicting Terms If these terms conflict with the rest of the Client Agreement, the rest of the Client Agreement will prevail. If these terms conflict with any other Client documentation, terms, or purchase order agreement, then the Client Agreement and these terms will prevail. 5.6 Entire Agreement The Client Agreement with these terms constitutes the entire understanding between the parties regarding Bartlett Tree Experts’ performance of the Work and supersedes all other agreements, whether written or oral, between the parties.