Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA66-369 / fi r: -© X. \\\ i RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION \\ MEETING FEBRUARY 8 , 1967 MINUTES Members present: Dayle Garrison, Robert Brower, James Denzer, John Racanello, John Sterling, Stan Stone, Richard Stredicke, Clark Teegarden Members absent: Gerald Cordell Staff present: Planning Director Gordon Y, Ericksen Others present: Lyman Houk, Engineering Department The Administrative Meeting of the Renton Planning Commission was called to order by Chairman Garrison at 0 ;00 P,M, 1. Roll call was taken by Secretary James Denzer, AU members responded present except Gerald Cordell. Action: It was moved by Racanello, 'seconded by Denzer, that the absence of Cordell be excused. Motion carried unanimously, 2 . Approval of Minutes : Chairman Garrison asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the Meeting of January 25, 1967 . There being none, the Chairman stated the Minutes stood approved as 'written. ww . VIRGIL R. FOX, Appl. No. t-369-66 (as amended by letter from appli- 3 cant) ,, rezone from S-1 to R-2 , property located on 88th Pl . S . between S. 126th and S. 128th Streets . The Chairman explained that this was the application for rezone to R-4 from S-1 heard by the Commission on December 28 , 1966 and denied. The applicant appealed the decision to the City Council and indicated that he would take a lesser zoning, At the Planning Commission Meeting of January 25, 1967 it was moved that the Plan- ning Commission send a letter to the City Council indicating that in the Commission' s opinion R-2 would be the best zoning classifi- cation for this particular property. The motion carried unanimously and this was done. The City Council decided that this action did not constitute a legal recommendation (according to the City Attorney) and referred the matter back to the Planning Commission for a definite recommendation. Action: It was moved by Teegarden, seconded by Denzer, that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council that the prop- erty of Virgil R. Fox be rezoned to R-2 as this conforms to the Comprehensive Plan. Motion carried, with Stone and Stredicke dissenting. 4 . New business: - SITE APPROVAL APPLICATION (a) SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH, property located at 1030 L St. Addition to existing church. Mr. Ericksen stated that as the property is located in an R-1 residential .zone, all construction must be approved by the Planning Commission, Mr, Ericksen • ‘., , - The Company has not surveyed the premises described in The sketch below is furnished without charge solely for the purpose of assisting in locating said premises and the Company assumes no liability for inaccuracies therein. It does not purport to show ALL highways, 'roads and easements adjoining or affecting said premises. . \ . • • ',J • - l . v r 7 J ' 0 U` p 7 , 4 • • o0REq /coôs6. • .. �! .........,... . • . , • :., . WTI Co. 3 Map Dept. Reference -'' . t , jet? _...--- t- iO 1_ 1/6444- 6 ,7A-Trxez .._______,r---j Minutes - Renton City Council Meeting 1-9-67 PRESENTATION OF NEW CITY HALL PLANS - PHASE II - The City Hall plan has 7 floors It was noted that the 5th floor is unfinished for future expansion and development. ! Chairman Hulse inquired regarding the question of a sprinkler system which was to be checked out with the Fire Chief and Building Department. Mr. Johnston stated that if double head sprinklers are involved the cost to be about $28,000.00. During discussion it was pointed out that all of the various questionable matters should be resolved prior to acceptance of Phase II. Mr. Campanella stated that if Council wishes are made known through its Committee they can be taken under advise- ment. 95% of them can be taken care of and outside the matter Mr. Hulse mentioned the rest of the building is ready for further procedure. Moved by Pedersen that Phase II be accepted with stipulation that consideration be given to the sprinkler system and relocation of the Health and Sanitation Department. The motion died for lack of second, and it was subsequently moved by Delaurenti, seconded by Hulse, that the matter be tabled for one week to allow for determinations to be made on the items in question. The motion carried. Attention was called to the many hours spent by the Committee and to the detail and different types of things to be considered in the planning and that the progress on the total plan has been good and it is not surprising to run across a detail at • which the Council might wish to take a second look. ' A letter was read from Randy Rockhill, Chairman, Municipal Arts Commission, giving ' support to Allied Arts of Renton's letter urging that plans for a fountain or water display be included in the new City Hall complex. Any assistance they might give was offered for promotion of this project. Moved by Delaurenti, seconded by Perry, to refer the communication to the City Hall Building Committee. The motion carried. A Petition to annex territory to the City of Renton was read wherein Petitioners agree to assume pre-existing bonded indebtedness of the City on basis of their pro- rate shares. The property is located on S.E. 116th Street between 133rd and 136th Avenues S.E. (Wood-Wickham properties-2.47 acres with*assessed value of $2,150.00. A second Petition to annex properties to Renton was read wherein owners of lands located on Sunset Boulevard East and 132nd Avenue S.E. indicated their willing- ness to assume pro-rata shares of pre-existing bonded indebtedness of the City if annexed. (Skagen-Lotto property) 8.5 acres with assessed valuation of $4,290.00. Moved by Schellert, seconded by Hulse, that the petitions be referred to the City Engineer to check signatures for validity of the Petition. Carried. i/\:- A letter from M. W. Heidy, Pallis Realty, appealed on behalf of Virgil Fox, Planning -i Commission denial of property rezone from S-1 to R-4 and stating that the objection to the rezone being the height this would be controlled by a change to R-3 zoning. Garrett mentioned that since a revision was desired to R-3 and the Council could only act on the R-4 appeal the applicant should reapply to the Planning Commission. Schellert added that the Commission had eagerly denied the R-4 but hadn't suggested• an alternative at the hearing, and Planning Director Ericksen confirmed that the Chairman had indicated there should have been some consideration for alternative zoning however the applicant did not express a desire to amend his application. Moved by Poli, seconded by Garrett, to refer the matter back to the Planning Com- mission. Inquiry was made as to whether this is to be treated as an appeal since the modification was offered. City Attorney Shellan stated that since an appeal was vested,, it should be treated thus and a hearing date be set. In the meantime if the Petitioner desires to modify his application he can amend his petition and submit it to the Planning Commission and it will come back to the Council. If he intends to stand on this R-4 he will have to appeal before the Council. After further dis- cussion regarding applicant's intentions the motion was voted on and failed upon verbal majority of No votes. Moved by Schellert, seconded by Morris, that the date of February 6 be set for hearing on this appeal. Carried. (Between 88th P1. South and 90th South) A letter from Vic TeGantvoort, Street Commissioner, requested transfer of funds within the Street Maintenance Department Account 3240 for purchase of a heat lamp vacuum applicator in sum of $1,032.14. Letter from Jack Wilson, City Engineer requested Resolution to transfer funds from Waterworks Maintenance Account 7120/605, Capital Outlay to balance 1966 accot:nts 311, $4.25; 315, $2,260.16; 317, $15.00; 325, $34.10 and 417, $618.12. Moved by Poli, seconded by Hulse, that the transfers be granted as requested with referral to the Law and Ordinance Committee for proper Resolution. Carried. A letter from Tejan Development Company requested to meet with the Fire and Water Committee and Council to present reasons for ri request for fire zone change on property at Renton Avenue between 90th and 91st Avenue South since the request was denied and they did not have an opportunity to justify the request. Moved by tArrei.t, seconded by Trimm, to refer the communication to the Fire and Water Committee. The motion carried. -2- 1 witi,111 61J. i 1 , , Minutes - Renton City Council Meeting 2-6-1967 HEARING: Appeal by Pallis Realty on behalf of Virgil Fox, of Planning Commission Decision denying rezone from S-1 to R-4. , This being the date set, the hearing was declared open. Letter from Planning Director Ericksen reported review of the proposed rezone by the Planning Commission on 1/25/67.Commission opinion was directed to the City Council that R-2 zoning with its lower". height restriction would be the best use classification for this property. Letters of protest and petition containing approximately 105 signatures were read as submitted by Mr. and Mrs. Albert Shinpich, Mr. and Mrs. Kenneth L. Harvey and Mrs. Lester Saffell. The area,located on 88th Place South between South 126th and South 128th Streets, contains 18000 sq. ft and lies in a triangular shape. Audience comment favoring the rezone was invited and Mr. Virgil Fox, owner of the subject property, stated his realization that R-4 would not be the best zoning and that R-3 being only 5 feet higher than is allowed by single family use, is more likely. He expressed willingness to make a deed restriction for R-3 or would otherwise accept whatever zoning the Planning Commission feels is proper which should remove the objection regarding the height. Mr. Pallis, Realtor, added that the proposed use is felt to be the highest and best utilization of the property, the property lending itself nicely to the 14-unit structure which will be planned to be equally attractive and desirable as residences in the area. He felt with the traffic coming off 90th Avenue South there should be no particular traffic problem on 88th. Objectionable comment was invited and voicing protest to R-4 or R-3 zoning because of the height and view restriction and problem of increased hazard with additional traffic were Eleanor I. Wood, 12741-88th Ave. So., Mr. John Jonas, 8837 S.E. 126th Street, Mr. Henry Rauch, 8906 South 128th Street, Mr. Kenneth Surcamp, 12823 - 90th Ave. So., Mr. Duane Cottom, 8911 South 126th Street. Present speeds and dangerous use of the streets were mentioned and inquiry made regarding responsibility for future improvements of streets and walkways. After final comment, it was moved by Morris, seconded by Garrett, to concur in the Planning Commission denial of the R-4 rezone. Discussion ensued regarding Planning Commission approval of R-2 and property owners expression that he would accept such zoning as the Commission determined best, and the fact that if the motion received concurrence there would be nothing further before the Council with petitioner being required to refile after six months has elapsed. Upon inquiry, City Attorney Shellan advised that the Commission and Council have the discretion to grant a lower density use if the property owner would so desire to amend his petition and if he petitions at the hearings. The protesting residents were questioned and did indicate they were not opposed to the R-2 zoning and the petitioner advised that although R-3 would be more desirable, he would be willing to amend his petition to R-2. Moved by Morris and seconded by Poli, that the pending motion be amended to read that petitioner submit his amended application to the Planning Commission with referral of the R-2 to the Planning Commission for recommendation. Discussion ensued on whether the Planning Commission opinion constituted a recommendation for the R-2 use since it was not acted upon at a regularly scheduled hearing meeting. Inquiry was made as to number of units allowed under R-2. Planning Director Ericksen stated that a special permit is required for the multiple use and that there would likely be 8-10 units. This would be single story duplex-type structures while the original request was for a single apartment building of 14-units. The Chair ruled the referral substitute motion rather than an amendment since it changes the intent. However, since the Commission attitude is known already it was moved by Pedersen,- seconded. by Hulse, to refer the matter to the Law and Ordinance Committee for Ordinance designating R-2 zoning. Question was raised as to whether the Commission has intended its opinion as a recommendation and whether property owner had in fact amended his application after which the pending motion was voted upon and failed. Subsequent motions were challenged and the Mayor reminded the Council it could override such decisions by a 2/3 majority vote. After discussions regarding prior actions and Planning Commission. Minutes, it was moved by Garrett, seconded by Hulse, to continue this hearing until the next Council meeting of February 20th, requesting the property owner to amend his application to R-2 with the Planning Commission and referral of the revision to the Planning Commission for recommendation. The motion carried. Mayor Custer as point of information to residents of the area .advised certain. street._and \ other off-site improvements are responsibilities of developers and the City has not had a Street L.I.D. since 1928. He also requested further information regarding the traffic problems. . . . . . COMMUNICATIONS: A letter was read from Alfred H. Croonquist, Architect, requesting vacation of portion of 106th Ave. S.E. from the North boundary of the Fred Nelsen Jr. High School to Puget Drive. It was pointed out that a Vacation Petition must contain signatures of all property owners involved to be valid and it was moved by Hulse, seconded by Pedersen, that applicant be so advised. Carried. Mr. Croonquist was present and advised that • all owners were in accord and proper document would be submitted. Moved by Garrett, seconded by Morris to refer the matter to the City Engineer. Carried. Moved by Hulse, seconded by Schellert, to refer the matter to the Law and Ordinance Committee with March 13th being set as date for hearing. Carried. -3- (1-/ December 29, 1966 If/h Mr. Virgil R. Fox 4800 S. Juneau 'St. Seattle, Washington Re: Application for change of zone, Appi. No. R-369-66 83th Pl. S. between S. 126th and S. 120th. Dear Mr. Fox: The Planning Commission 'at its meeting of December 26th, reviewed your application for change of zone. On .the basis of its review, the Planning" Commission ' moved to deny the proposed zoningchange.e. An appeal the Planning Commission action can be made in writing to the City Council within ten days after the public hearing. If you have any questions regarding the :Planning Com- mission actions, please contact the Planning Department. Very truly yours, . Gordon Y. :ricksen Planning Director GY8/bay • CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT Tivi/j Aht) MEMORANDUM TO: • y Attorney DATE: March 6 , 1967 FROM Planning Dept. SUBJECT: ' Virgil R. Fox, Rezone Appl. No. R-369-66 .,';'With reference to inter-office memo dated February 20, 1967 , re- <'"',garding Virgil R. Fox rezoning, the following change was made in the official Minutes of the Renton Planning Commission Meeting 6 of February 8, 1967 : (page 1, commentary on Virgil R. Fox) . `." "The City Council decided that this action did not constitute an official recommendation from the Planning Commission and referred the matter back, to the Commission for such recommendation. " • • • INTER-OFFICE MEMO To: Date Mr. Gordon Ericksen, Planning Director February 20.. Iyo/ From: Gerard M. Shellan, City Attorney Re: . Virgil R. Fox Rezoning Dear Gordon: We noticed in the Planning Commission's Minutes of February 8, 1967 under Item 3 that "the. City Council decided that this action would not constitute a legal recommendation (according to the City Attorney) and referred the matter back to the Planning Commission for a definite recommendation". Frankly, we do not believe that this is correct at all and the City Council: Minutes do not so indicate. You will recall that considerable discussion was had on Mr. Fox' application d.rndcpeti .- tion before the Council on February 6th. A reference was made to a motion passed by the Planning Commission at its meeting on January 25, 1967 authorizing a letter to be sent to the Council indicating that the Commission's opinion was that a R-2 zoning would be the best zoning classification for the subject property. Considerable discussion then ensued and I think that you will `'remember that I at least twice suggested that you indicate to the Council whether this motion was meant to be simply a general opinion by the Planning Commission or whether it constituted direct action in recommending a zoning change for Mr. Fox. We do not believe that the Council •was advised by you as to what ,the exact intent of the Commission was and a majority therefore felt it would be better "to `do it right" and refer it back to the Commission based on a; proper "Amendment by the Petitioner to Rezone to R-2. The City AttorneydIA not pass on the legality of the Commission's motibi. . S ' a \ /i/ INTER-OFFICE MEMO To: Mr. Gordon 8ricksen, Planning Director • Date Pb.a 20, 1967 From: Gerard M. Shellan, City Attorney • Page Two We thought we should sat the records straight so the proper correcti©na can be made in your Minutes. We remain, Yours very truly, "5// Gerard M. Shellan, City Attorney GMS:mr P7/I Minutes - Renton City Council Meeting 2-6-1967 HEARING: Appeal by Pallis Realty on behalf of Virgil Fox, of Planning Commission Decision denying rezone from S-1 to R-4. This being the date set, the hearing was dedlared open. Letter from Planning Director Ericksen reported review of the proposed rezone by the Planning Commission on 1/25/67.Comm-ission opinion was directed to the City Council that R-2 zoning with its lower. height restriction would be the best use classification for this property. Letters of protest and petition containing approximately 105 signatures were read as submitted by Mr. and Mrs. Albert Shinpich, Mr. and Mrs. Kenneth L. Harvey and Mrs. Lester Safell. The area,located on 88th Place South between South 126th and South 128th Streets, contains 18000 sq. ft and lies in a triangular shape. Audience comment favoring the rezone was invited and Mr. Virgil Fox, owner of the subject property, stated his realization that R-4 would not be the best zoning and that R-3 being only 5 feet higher than is allowed by single family use, is more likely. He expressed willingness to make a deed restriction for R-3 or would otherwise accept whatever zoning the Planning Commission feels is proper which should remove the objection regarding the height. Mr. Pallis, Realtor, added that the proposed use is felt to be the highest and best utilization of the property, the property lending itself nicely to the 14-unit structure which will be planned to be equally attractive and desirable as residences in the area. He felt with the traffic coming off 90th. Avenue South there should be no particular traffic problem on 88th. Objectionable comment was invited and voicing protest to R-4 or R-3 zoning because of the height and view restriction and problem of increased hazard with additional traffic were Eleanor I. Wood, 12741-88th Ave. So. , Mr. John Jonas, 8837 S.E. 126th Street, Mr. Henry Rauch, 8906 South 128th Street, Mr. Kenneth Surcamp, 12823 - 90th Ave. So., Mr. Duane Cottom, 8911 South 126th Street. Present speeds and dangerous use of the streets were mentioned and inquiry made regarding responsibility for future improvements of streets and walkways. After final comment, it was moved by Morris, seconded by Garrett, to concur in the Planning Commission denial of the R-4 rezone. Discussion ensued regarding Planning Commission approval of R-2 and property owners expression that he would accept such zoning as the Commission determined best, and the fact that if the motion received concurrence there would be nothing further before the Council with petitioner being required to refile after six months has elapsed. Upon inquiry, City Attorney Shellan advised that the Commission and Council have the discretion to grant a lower density use if the property owner would so desire to amend his petition and if he petitions at the hearings. The protesting residents were questioned and did indicate they were not opposed to the R-2�zoning and the petitioner advised that although R-3 would be more desirable, he would be willing to amend his petition to R-2. Moved by Morris and seconded by Poli, that the pending motion be amended to read that petitioner submit his amended application to the Planning Commission with referral of the R-2 to the Planning Commission for recommendation. Discussion ensued on whether the Planning Commission opinion constituted a recommendation for the R-2 use since it was not acted upon at a regularly scheduled hearing meeting. Inquiry wasmade as to number of units allowed under R-2. Planning Director Ericksen stated that a special permit is required for the multiple use and that there would likely be 8-10 units. This would be single story duplex-type structures while the original request was for a single apartment building of 14-units. The Chair ruled- the referral a substitute motion rather than an amendment since it changes the intent. However, since the Commission attitude is known already it was moved . by Pedersen, seconded. by Hulse, to refer the matter to the Law and Ordinance Committee for Ordinance designating R-2 zoning. Question was raised as to whether the Commission has intended its opinion as a recommendation and whether property owner had in fact amended his application after which the pending motion was voted upon and failed. Subsequent motions were challenged and the Mayor reminded the Council it could override such decisions by a 2/3 majority vote. After discussions regarding prior actions and Planning Commission. Minutes, it was moved by Garrett, seconded by Hulse, to continue this hearing until the next Council meeting of February 20th, requesting the . property owner to amend his application to R-2 with the Planning Commission and referral of the revision to the Planning Commission for recommendation. The motion carried. Mayor Custer as point of information to residents of the area ..advised certain street-and other off-site improvements are responsibilities of developers and the City has not had a Street L.I.D. since 1928. He also requested further information regarding the traffic problems. . . .. COMMUNICATIONS: A letter was read from Alfred H. Croonquist, Architect, requesting vacation of portion of 106th Ave. S .E . from the North boundary of the Fred Nelsen Jr. High School to Puget Drive. It was pointed out that a Vacation Petition must contain signatures of all . property owners involved to be valid and it was moved by Hulse, seconded by Pedersen, that applicant be so advised. Carried. Mr. Croonquist was present and advised that all owners were in accord and proper document would be submitted. Moved by Garrett, seconded by Morris to refer the matter to the City Engineer. Carried. Moved by Hulse, seconded by Schellert, to refer the matter to the Law and Ordinance Committee with March 13th being set as date for hearing.. Carried. -3- ORDINANCE NO. ,2-3 6 6 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES, WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROO•i SUBURBAN RESIDENCE DISTRICT (S-1) TO RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (R-2) WHEREAS under Chapter VII, Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No.1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton", as amended, and the maps in conjunction therewith, the properties hereinbelow described have heretofore been zoned as Suburban Residence District (S-1); and WHEREAS a change for zone classification of said property has been filed with the City Clerk on or about December 8, 1966, which petition was then duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation, study and public hearing and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about December 28, 1966, and thereafter the Petitioner-Owner duly amended his Petition for rezoning upon approval of the Planning Comm.i.sa.ion and the City Council, and said Petition, as amended, having been duly con- sidered by said. Planning Commission and said request for rezoning be generally in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE hAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Residential District (R-2) ; the City Engineer and the Planning Director are hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: Lots 6, 7, 8 and 9, Block 6, Latimer's Lake Park Addition as recorded in Vol. 18, Page 63, Records of King Co. ,Washington (located on 88th P1. S. between S 126th and S. 128th Streets) SECTION II: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and legal publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 27th day of February, 1967. Helmie Nelson, City Clerk ti - APPROVED BY THE UUAYOR this 27th day of ebr, ary, 1967. ' . Donald W. Custer, NayorE Approved as to form: - Gerard H. Shellan, City Attorney Date of Publication: NJRR 2 1967 INTER-OFFICE MEMO To: Gordon Erickson, Planning Director Date February 21, 1967 From: Gerard M. Shellan, City Attorney Re: Virgil Fox Rezoning Dear Sir: Attached hereto you will find stencil of the proposed Rezoning Ordinance from S-1 to R-2 for the above captioned. Would you please check it over to be sure it meets with your full approval. We remain Ver Sly ours, (//� Ger rd M. Shellan, City Attorney GMS:ds Attach. cc: Helmie Nelson, City Cleric Mayor Custer Mr. Vern Morris, Law & Ord. Comm. j , , WI)Arl) 0 ----i Minutes - Renton City Council Meeting 1-9-67 PRESENTATION OF NEW CITY HALL PLANS - PHASE II - The City Hall plan has 7 floors. It was noted that the 5th floor is unfinished for future expansion and development. Chairman Hulse inquired regarding the question of a sprinkler system which was to be checked out with the Fire Chief and Building Department. Mr. Johnston stated that if double head sprinklers are involved the cost to be about $28,000.00. During discussion it was pointed out that all of the various questionable matters should be resolved prior to acceptance of Phase II. Mr. Campanella stated that if Council wishes are made known through its Committee they can be taken under advise- ment. 95% of them can be taken care of and outside the matter Mr. Hulse mentioned the rest of the building is ready for further procedure. Moved by Pedersen that Phase II be accepted with stipulation that consideration be given to the sprinkler system and relocation of the Health and Sanitation Department. The motion died for lack of second, and it was subsequently moved by Delaurenti, seconded by Hulse, that the matter be tabled for one week to allow for determinations to be made on the items in question. The motion carried. Attention was called to the many hours spent by the Committee and to the detail and different types of things to be considered in the planning and that the progress on the total plan has been good and it is not surprising to run across a detail at which the Council might wish to take a second look. A letter was read from Randy Rockhill, Chairman, Municipal Arts Commission, giving support to Allied Arts of Renton's letter urging that plans for a fountain or water display be included in the new City Hall complex. Any assistance they might give was offered for promotion of this project. Moved by Delaurenti, seconded by Perry, to refer the communication to the City Hall Building Committee. The motion carried. A Petition to annex territory to the City of Renton was read wherein Petitioners agree to assume pre-existing bonded indebtedness of the City on basis of their pro- rate shares. The property is located on S.E. 116th Street between 133rd and 136th Avenues S.E. (Wood-Wickham properties-2.47 acres with•`assessed value of $2,150.00. A second Pe,titi^n to annex properties to Renton was read wherein owners of lands located on Sunset Boulevard East and 132nd Avenue S.E. indicated their willing- ness to assume pro-rata shares of pre-existing bonded indebtedness of the City if annexed. (Skagen-Lotto property) 8.5 acres with assessed valuation of $4,290.00. Moved by Schellert, seconded by Hulse, that the petitions be referred to the City Engineer to check signatures for validity of the Petition. Carried. letter from M. W. Heidy, Pallis Realty, appealed on behalf of Virgil Fox, Planning Commission denial of property rezone from S-1 to R-4 and stating that the objection to the rezone being the height this would be controlled by a change to R-3 zoning. Garrett mentioned that since a revision was desired to R-3 and the Council could only act on the R-4 appeal the applicant should reapply to the Planning Commission. Schellert added that the Commission had eagerly denied the R-4 but hadn't suggested an alternative at the hearing, and Planning Director Ericksen confirmed that the Chairman had indicated there should have been some consideration for alternative zoning however the applicant did not express a desire to amend his application. Moved by Poli, seconded by Garrett, to refer the matter back to the Planning Com- mission. Inquiry was made as to whether this is to be treated as an appeal since the modification was offered. City Attorney Shellan stated that since an appeal was vested, it should be treated thus and a hearing date be set. In the meantime if the Petitioner desires to modify his application he can amend his petition and submit it to the Planning Commission and it will come back to the Council. If he intends to stand on this R-4 he will have to appeal before the Council. After further dis- cussion regarding applicant's intentions the motion was voted on and failed upon verbal majority of No votes. Moved by Schellert, seconded by Morris, that the date of February 6 be set for hearing on this appeal. Carried. (Between 88th Pl. South and 90th South) A letter from Vic TeGantvoort, Street Commissioner, requested transfer of funds within the Street Maintenance Department Account 3240 for purchase of a heat lamp vacuum applicator in sum of $1,032.14. Letter from Jack Wilson, City Engineer requested Resolution to transfer funds from Waterworks Maintenance Account 7120/605, Capital Outlay to balance 1966 accoKnts 311, $4.25; 315, $2,260.16; 317, $15.00; 325, $34.10 and 417, $618.12. Moved by Poli, seconded by Hulse, that the transfers be granted as requested with referral to the Law and Ordinance Committee for proper Resolution. Carried. A letter from Tejan Development Company requested to meet with the Fire and Water Committee and Council to present reasons for o request for fire zone change on property at Renton Avenue between 90th and 91st Avenue'Soilth since the request was denied and they did not have an opportunity to justify the request. Moved by tarrei.t, seconded by Trimm, to refer the communication to the Fire and Water Committee. The motion carried. -2- INTER-OFFICE MEMO To: Chairman. Planning ummiesion I e February 23, 1967 From: o P1:+nn ng Tlop r man4 In accordance with the wishes of the City Attorney, we suggest the following amendment to the Planning Commission Minutes of the Meeting of February 8, 1967: Page 1, item 3, the sentence reading "The City Council decided that this action did not constitute a legal recommendation (according to the City Attorney) and referred the matter back to the Planning Commission for a definite recommendation." be revised to read: "The City Council decided that this action did not constitute an official recommendation from the Plan- ning Commission and referred the matter back to the Commission for such recommendation*" Encl. r INTER-OFFICE MEMO L/ To• Mr. Gordon Ericksen, Planning Director Date February 20, 1967 From: Gerard M. Shellan, City Attorney Re' Virgil R. Fox Rezoning Dear Gordon: We noticed in the Planning Commission's Minutes of February 8, 1967 under Item 3 that "the City Council decided that this action would not constitute a legal recommendation (according to the City Attorney) and -referred the matter back to the Planning Commission for a definite recommendation". Frankly, we do not believe that this is correct at all and the City Council 'inutos do not so indicate, You will :recall" that considerable discussion was had on Mr. Fox' application ad crattik tion. before the Council on February 6th. A reference was made to a motion passed by the ;• , ' Planning Commission at its meeting on January 25, 1967 authorizing a letter to be sent ;, to the Council indicating that the Commission's opinion was that a 2-2 zoning would be the best zoning classification for the subject property. Considerable discussion then ens ued and I think that you will remember that I at least twice suggested that you indicate to the Council whether this motion was meant to be simply a general opinion by tie Planning Commission or whether it constituted direct action in recommending a zoning change for Mr, Fox, t'Je do not believe that the Council was advised by you as to what the exact intent of, the Commission was and a majority therefore felt it would be better Q1to do it right" and refer it back to the Commission based on a proper "Amendment by the Petitioner to Rezone to R.02.P The City Attorney dlid not pass on the legality of the Commission's motion. INTER-OFFICE MEMO ;t" To: Mro Gordon Ericksen, Planning Director - Date Feb, 20, 1967 prom:': ` Gerard M. Shellan, City Attorney Page Two tye thought we should set the records straight so the proper corrections can be made in your Minutes. , We remain, Yours very truly, . . 4_,4.e....t..4...4.....ee .., -/..7, ....e.„.._......... , Gerard M. Shel lan, City Attorney .. C ►II \\ • • February 20, 1967 Honorable Donald W, Caister, • Mayor Members of the- City Council - City of Renton _ City Hall . . Rentona:, Washington 98055 _ Re = 'V'1RGIL R. FOX, .Appl No•, -R-369-66<• (as a°_°e a -',_ e est for Rezone from -1.. t Rq 2 a • .property: located on .8 8t a Place S. : and 90th A t na e . . Gentlemen and Mrs. Dablquist a The Planning Commission-at its Administrative Meeting of • February 8,. 1967, reviewed the .Virgil R'. Fox application for: rezone. ' he: application; was amended by letter. from the applicant's representative indicting. that R-2 zoning. would .be considered equitable • . . Upon completion of :its review, ,the Planning Commission recommended to the City Coc.il that the property .in questionbe rezoned. to R-,-2 ass this,.zoning conforms to the Comprehensive plan:,,. Very.. truly yours, / • ordon Y. nicks . • g�>�it®ctor: � Flaarana.ri ndi, GYE n hh., \. . ,i,,,..&, _ . 71yz% _..<. , /0 c,, f,) ,( 6' , 7/ 1 -� -iiS REALTY �J Teal esfafe and gnsurance // , �v � 4739%z RAINIER — PARKWAY 5-6777 / SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 9E108 iri 1 February 8, 1967 • • City of Renton . Planning, Commission Planning Department Renton, Washington Re: Virgil Cox - Rezone from Si-• to R-4, #R 369-66 • Gent lemen: ��ti/- -u/./.5"I - This letxer will serve as our request to amend�,0 the, above-mentioned zonings stated above and as indicated by the Planning Commission. This is also in accordance with the City Council hearing of February 6, 1967, where it was suggested that R-2 zoning would be more e-pitable. - Please accept our appreciation for your patience and assistance in this matter. • It is our understanding that this matter will he brought before the Renton City Council on February 20, 1967. Very truly yours LIS REALTY-"--) • George . llis GCP:jmb ' ', \,c,,, (-L U ; s(ito i fir . /v��,. h'L\/�� , '4' ; ,. ... . : : , • F runny 20, 19;4,1 :: . . • _ . Bonor blee •)onald:'W. ster,:.mayor . • :. ;Members ".of -t'he. City Council_7. • : Y o Renton • City.,Rta 11 :: • - `' - .. : -- . Rinton, Waahingtan '4803 . ' . • , ;- . Re VIRGIL R.. .F4x;.•Appi }Uo«, R-36.9-66- (ai •- • . ' - - aw.sracla).-,. Request:•tor Res,onee 'from 8 1... ' . :. . '...•.to:'R 2./..-property• located .on: $d8th• Plebe',0." ._ • : "since :90ta •.AverL 1 :$0.. : • • ' - , . 'Gentle fern andMrs.:,,:gahigiuiste.-' : . , .. -.' , : .- - .: The. Planing. Comanission. at its., ministrative :Nesting of . :.•robruary 8-, ,'1967,.'reviewed .the. 'Virgil' R,•' rox application' .. • . ' ' •-.. - • . - ,- . for rezone..„- The application was amended.by. letter', from • ' - ' • •the::a►pplicant's .raprasentative-..indicating that: R-3;.atoning ..: . - . would.'be'' considered equitable.-:-. :. .. .. . . Upon completion of its..:review,':,:thee .'Planning,.Com i.ission _ .• ' . -. .. • raeox�$nded to the City. Council,.that •thee, propeirty. in: •:: _: , • • . . - • question ::be, rezoned. -to ;-2•.•asr: this zoning'.conforms to . . ` the.. Comprehern$ivee -plan:: -.. •- Very truly 'y�'E tU a�r" don.-..V. I : 'aksin,.. - Ianing .,�� +actor :,. . 9ao1. , __ . ,, , . . i , , yi----- ._ ,_ _.,.. pc,, • fo �� G *Ails) �: REALTY 7 /I' a ` // Teal �sfafe and insurance 1 y0 21'i 4739Yz RAINIER - PARKWAY 5-6777 f/ y� V ,{ SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 90106 t, 5 y February 8, 1967 vi City of Renton Planning Commission Planning Department Renton, Washington . Re: Virgil Fox - Rezone from S-1 to R-4, 1fR-369-66 Gentlemen: Al��j, /,e, i_� This letjer will serve as our request to amendnthe above-mentioned zonings stated above and as indicated by the Planning Commission. This is also in accordance with the City 'Council hearing of February 6, 1967, where it was suggested that R-2 zoning would be more e~pitable. • Please accept our appreciation for your patience and assistance in . this matter. It is our understanding that this matter will be brought before the Renton City Council on February 20, 19670 Very truly yours 4jEALTY ) ' - George llis GCP:jmb • �r A`. .. . . Minutes - Renton City Council Meeting 2-6-1967 HEARING: Appeal by Pallis Realty on behalf of Virgil Fox, of Planning Commission Decision denying rezone from S-1 to R-4. This being the date set, the hearing was declared open. Letter from Planning Director Ericksen reported review of the proposed rezone by the Planning Commission on 1/25/67.Commission opinion was directed to the City Council that R-2 zoning with its lower, height restriction would be the best use classification for this property. Letters of protest and petition containing approximately 105 signatures were read as submitted by Mr. and Mrs. Albert Shinpich, Mr. and Mrs. Kenneth L. Harvey and Mrs. Lester Saffell. The area,located on 88th Place South between South 126th and South 128th Streets, contains 18000 sq. ft and lies in a triangular shape. Audience comment favoring the rezone was invited and Mr. Virgil Fox, owner of the subject property, stated his realization that R-4 would not be the best zoning and that R-3 being only 5 feet higher than is allowed by single family use, is more likely. He expressed willingness to make a deed restriction for R-3 or would otherwise accept whatever zoning the Planning Commission feels is proper which should remove the objection regarding the height. Mr. Pallis, Realtor, added that the proposed use is felt to be the highest and best utilization of the property, the property lending itself nicely to the 14-unit structure which will be planned to be equally attractive and desirable as residences in the area. He felt with the traffic coming off 90th Avenue South there should be no particular traffic problem on 88th. Objectionable comment was invited and voicing protest to R-4 or R-3 zoning because of the height and view restriction and problem of increased hazard with additional traffic were Eleanor I. Wood, 12741-88th Ave. So., Mr. John Jonas, 8837 S.E. 126th Street, Mr. Henry Rauch, 8906 South 128th Street, Mr. Kenneth Surcamp, 12823 - 90th Ave. So., Mr. Duane Cottom, 8911 South 126th Street. Present speeds and dangerous use of the streets were mentioned and inquiry made regarding responsibility for future improvements of streets and walkways. After final comment, it was moved by Morris, seconded by Garrett, to concur in the Planning Commission denial of the R-4 rezone. Discussion ensued regarding Planning Commission approval of R-2 and property owners expression that he would accept such zoning as the Commission determined best, and the fact that if the motion received concurrence there would be nothing further before the Council with petitioner being required to. refile after six months has elapsed. Upon inquiry, City Attorney Shellan advised that the Commission and Council have the discretion to grant a lower density use if the property owner would so desire to amend his petition and if he petitions at the hearings. The protesting residents were questioned and did indicate they were not opposed to the R-2 zoning and the petitioner advised that although R-3 would be more desirable, he would be willing to amend his petition to R-2. Moved by Morris and seconded by Poll., that the pending motion be amended to read that petitioner submit his amended application to the Planning Commission with referral of the R-2 to the Planning Commission for recommendation. Discussion ensued on whether the Planning Commission opinion constituted a recommendation for the R-2 use since it was not acted upon at a regularly scheduled hearing meeting. Inquiry was made as to number of units allowed under R-2. Planning Director Ericksen stated that a special permit is required for the multiple use and that there would likely be 8-10 units. This would be single story duplex-type structures while the original request was for a single apartment building of 14-units. The Chair ruled the referral a substitute motion rather than an amendment since it changes the intent. However, since the Commission attitude is known already it was moved by Pedersen, seconded. by Hulse, to refer the matter to the Law and Ordinance Committee for Ordinance designating R-2 zoning. Question was raised as to whether the Commission has intended its opinion as a recommendation and whether property owner had in fact amended his application after which the pending motion was voted upon and failed. Subsequent motions were challenged and the Mayor reminded the Council it could override such decisions by a 2/3 majority vote. After discussions regarding prior actions and Planning Commission. Minutes, it was moved by Garrett, seconded by Hulse, to continue this hearing until the next Council meeting of February 20th, requesting the property owner to amend his application to R-2 with the Planning Commission and referral of the revision to the Planning Commission for recommendation. The motion carried. Mayor Custer as point of information to residents of the area .advised certain street .and other off-site improvements are responsibilities of developers and the City has not had Street L.I.D. since 1928. He also requested further information regarding the traffic problems. COMMUNICATIONS: A letter was read from Alfred H. Croonquist, Architect, requesting vacation of portion of 106th Ave. S.E. from the North boundary of the Fred Nelsen Jr. High School to Puget Drive. It was pointed out that a Vacation Petition must contain signatures of all property owners involved to be valid and it was moved by Hulse, seconded by Pedersen, that applicant be so advised. Carried. Mr. Croonquist was present and advised that all owners were in accord and proper document would be submitted. Moved by Garrett, seconded by Morris to refer the matter to the City Engineer. Carried. Moved by Hulse, seconded by Schellert, to refer the matter to the Law and Ordinance Committee with March 13th being set as date for hearing. Carried. -3- +Jsi it a1 2 . .... &,. >i x q V/FAA /woof ct eit ais1 Adre ,OMs's 4s F'yc7L (/a 75'/ ereg' P%s * coc, i) I EXis';rl' y' a frfig f/c oz /o/r ' eer.2 " P%ec 050i/ r ,a va / to dze /K az 5.7!oil/. - ‘3=...a."-er-Af/otaak,e/j/ 9/ ?a /D./IN W' ° 7c{ 47de u,/ar 2e o k€4 VS-3- 97/)2/ v,Zs' l ecvY; 4 f3/3/� Sr 33 =. ,f ,� n .... cod ��/ •lses%,i °L ,/S/� ?oaf /oN6' rapt h/, J Y/ rB� �.�y 9�/ r2o5. (7-€.2 3044 39 r7,("cr 3�?:707-- kL ej f �'?3 .�. �r---�.._ =fir •.a yt/ �Lt a J�o kd ueo 4 x a- *�[ 3 7•3 m T??117, e7lc/ • 000(5Jl40, - 000 L"4, ()'33 try.317 7e /oar-n iu�s3 ,0.. r),e) hcya/ • 8 e/ r nos. /b/v, k!9'/ J7.'0..5,1 Th3 3 f; .■..a.�.. "� ,� 3z172/f n4,,/S° 3r, - 6' £ -0 3 u1 - f 39 p/ 0? J;?f(j'J 520x/o/S3b' +Y3O/1 — ry / �.� T._ 4. -1 t _' Prf ;7 a'3A. yo,.7/e Hro Hj ez '*n■r 2,)d// CAI /, 'e/ ,[as 3i 5P' '3 WfO • 7 • . ,,.. .. :. • y. 6, ..I9157 • -" Honorable 'Donald W. •"Custer"i: : yyoar • , . `•MMe*be s- of the City_Councii. , . " " . . ' • • +pity, 0f..:Renton" . City r fiall - ' . ". • flenton4" Washington" 98055 - " ' . . • -. • •_ . ..._• .Re; . Virgil fit, • Fox,•` Rezone- .+Appeal:" • App].rt_' No.• " t 369-bf#. ' ue "t: ior..Ztezo ie t� "g.�:l'"to . . 9:', • ?ropeirty b. - ' . " • .:ted •on 48th•"Pia 'SS.� ands' 90th "Av'enue 'S _ • -_ " Gentbee n and Idra..""3 n tlgnist z• , •:; :. - • ,,..The.'Planning :Cooaamission at••' its. public -Retiring "meeting. "on •- " b 28 to er- 0" l966., reviewer -the above `application -' and:.the ' ' : : request. for rezornin ==to •1-4. •T se •ggestion of"-rizoning to .. • - " .- :: R-3 Wait• also discussed ..at..'eat':,s+ee ting., . The. applicant _.aandic ate d-,••in the discussion...of the Ri-3 zone that it would. " , . _ , :-• not--he 5Uit+ 1e !cr"-.•the•, pro at deveiopswatt ,• f:the::prop-: .,:• - erty..:". -A.. petition frOg residents in the area in" opposition : •". - •- - to the. rezone :was presented to the Planning a fission., • . . • " . • and •a" •nuaber"of Perplex in:the. audience voicad••their ob • • :- .j ections• to•-the .proposed R-4" zone :ss Well as •: -3 •and. R- .. . " ..• _ :_ .zoning. The .basic.•.oblsctio w.'w a _those of. :viaw •obstruc -.• • • . - • . :.tion'.•and :the: detrisieentaal' effect "the 'propos a "development.. ":•''' ' - " • :"•would have :on:the- adjacent--single .:fawsily "resiidence.. " : • . - -Thee property:. in •question' i s •.a'".triangular area et the . : " ". .intersection Of 88th "Place •B. and 90 . 'venue S. The . •- " "., 'total 'area of •the:"pro�r rty is., aapprosi*atsly-':I0.,,00s• squaare: . • • . . . .. . '-• • "feet. ' Thar" Comprehensive."Flan 'indicates •ths area. as .pc :. "- • ,. tential multi y,"::+famil residential,.. • The" principal" •access" • : . : .- . . '• street, $ath:"]Place" d ' -is presently classed As •a con aunity .. arterial street.; 'The.'.'existing zoning- is •s!.nailer. family •,•.. • •' • - • .. ".residential,,` and -the'.".property;"pres tly• has ..a:siauali. 'fry '. . • = .. "" - single family rei •no. on .it - de . , • • . • The;properties- to"'.the•:east of 90th. Avenue S.•.are. -zoned-, on ed: "_. - '••.- = ` • *.$--i , an8.:•R'-3. .-.The• properties •to -the west. .and..,to the •nort h. ••• are:-zoned;3:�g,'. single. family rnaidential, and the area: is : " • . - ' ` for"••:the• -most .peace developed at single .family residential. " : • 4ayor D.' W. Custer and - 2 Members' of. the 'City.Council ; • Paage P.brua ry` 6 .967 • • -- :•In its :deliberations, the. PlanningPlanning..Commiesion. indicated that-the:'.aatension Of 'i 4 .Sorting..to the west .Of 90th.avenue _ . . 5.-, en woui * . .t .felt, haves de is etal 'effect--on. the ►singl _ ' •`. . family residts a and. would not be in -_the bast interests=.:ot the;aareaa.-: • Lt was- on this basis:.:t at the •flannir+ s , :sen *levied :that the rezone request he deni :. • : The. X*nning:.�riisa$.an•"discussed the zoning of.:.:t p .. • . • : :erty: in ,.qutesticn again at its" 'January 25 9.. .1967 Publi . daring':Meeting: on the basis of a request --for + reconsid- *raation by ,thee applicant« noteddiscussio>i that, since..the propty.-in., question abuts property presently, utilized"for business purposes that it was.:not--desirable ' : • single .fa ly residential _user but would more logically se a is °* buffet between'"the single :family residences son • : • the west :wide of. Cstb place S. .and the. comaiaroial; rapert to the Gant of the property in- estion.. ,• •• " • One of "the:.principal .. jsctions to . propelled risen* by- • - = ..:the residents:,in..'thee., area 'vas-that of the height -and, the • , • •• - = obstruction of view.• It wet 'noted that the, height. limit:. • of .an •.1- 3. sr here =could be detrimental :to- ae character-of . the singly family: 'resi en•tial area --and block the' view. The it-;'.2 tenew, h wever« with its lower height restriction9:... ` , : it was felt : rould.:not necessarily' be del riMentul' to' the"- • : . • residents in.tiara:areaa :end Would serve as en aiequaate brtf- : :•. • -• for:between: the; 'h*sinew► and the•z esidential. Uses« The :. -. Planning': Cammisiien, therefore,* indicate4...that :in ;its-. . opinion A.2. would he the hest. toning claassifiestion :got • the pr • ope ty . .q stion r. -• ° - • Gordon Y. 'Briccs+au : Planning': Director , 1'-• 1' r r . -,......... ----..... .,,, .-----/ ( r --/;,&. .• 4--.;-m-Li *I t h,'././. / . „" -------- ,, lfi 'A I • 1.1.Miln --M ISIM MEL EMI MI r''IM 1. . __ VININEMOL •\\ \\% \\ \4> ..• ififfil i • r- 11111r 42 ' .: , if --• ' r illi 8 i .—..... 1!! '•'\'• WEI .' ,111111 11 ' ',' II __---, t-- ,4444,,,, ' IIMMINISII- lbst•rt. .,- , -"o7kik:04,444 ea,. . MEWL.1 , -4.' 1:e6 , oil •_. i -pi 1 ..--- , 0,,,rd, , . tr. 0€0171.1!7"--41;-/....---47:..w.,"" 4..iilittiiiii.;nil.," :f i: : ,Toti . ._ ..,. .„... ,i.o., \ , „L.... ----- .1a,_,,,„„: . .-4 '---' :4 -4 I ....,.. IIIIJ Mill 'imumu 4-1. ._- „ ._. . .IN*/ -Li Oirif*,,,1• 4,!,'„„,-- :'.,,, __________ • ..rit...• It= ' • •- _•..___*._ - ateiiiir ta • ---- -.14,11e,,,,, ' ''' s•. 'i, <-1-;-1----/- 'par 1,221. x ,00„, .,..„, iki..•-•-- - _ t_____ aneteettalciillilii- 11..... ,.,9,,, t-I D 1 H iipillu'd •MMIL;. • bownr aomas a\ L -1-- al:: • 0- -7-I., 80 •, 4 , '4' ID . ,.._ NM - lin Z.I2. • ! —roam!ill . , • . . • IlifirNernft 0 f •,, J .,---. T.-7,:', . / • I . • / i / ,, IS , /--C-1641 ,IKHIIII 1"\ ‘• - , , , , , ...., _ . 1. • - : "..- '4,,,,' c.,,,od 1.----•,- ..... gla gt 4. i 1 "7. .--- 1 I. ' i ' li 1 lj -----1- 41 :.If \ • 'id! !tam Ita: I ; •— r . :' • j_g_i_ftsa. -, s, - . , , 1 , . .--''',:e4P. ,'"\•-\.. '' a'..,1== a mosm• , 1 i 1 ii ' ._...s, f . . . • 0_'• ! cp,s, o c 2 01. ,oe, e ' 3.A1C11194 1 __, imp, 3A- rsa 7• 0'''' ‘im. rw, H t 0-a 0 0, . , , , i \ s .!„, , --1 . .... 10 , , , , , , j ... i t," t ),•• j,.... , ...„, I . ,,i... .1 .1,, ,,, . G , I 2!2 , C .. In 1 .ell• A• wInpi-1-11 1 V.O. ; ..... 1 ,,-\,1 , i„ 1 I \ ig I 17-•i.' ---:__ anZei \ • „lomat/91mi ri § i„.. , s ?, s.,..,„ i i—r--LF-\\ [.....t...1. 1 1 1 . ....,VM • i 29 , 19 ch '4 9s•..T. „... ..-.-- •.--...,\\ , , . si.,1,, , !I .C;•. ' ' \ • IIHI . . rh- Nit a ik '..\\,.: . ), ; • i • Li C ‘511 ,..\ . ks /,, 1.-...::t..•_K.- g c i E ---i •s 1 ! 44-. ' --1'. \A,:y, IW3 IM illt.., '"•••.lih Z 1 •-•:•al.!,1 ••IIINRA" roz allas z \ -1. ••, 2 I, 2 G •,,i MI.11. UN I. -• -pti, 7 < -He 1 cic •1 . .1 ; 1 .1.. I .. tea 1 i .aw . i " 1 ,C I Eg _,- O.: .1s• 1.r.1,1SH „ 1,, tidik-7,. CI 6is Mt ti -.- .:. MI • P. ii I Ns PI k . / ff is,,i* •:,...i.„; 1 i owl c .-) ! ii.........i , , ! 2 ili‘N, ma4 242.1r. 1.71 Wall'',2.1.7,4 w-,..„.' is „"0 t •-• s I,: .."-'1" '`''__I „ . ,„,.. \ ...-• LIM iao•Imo, ,/._ .L,/' // 1 \‘ \ /d.i•'' . ' t--• . ., _j Li, • , 6'0,,,,,, y *-1P. P. •L. .2.9.- \\ 't a 7„-;-Wm ' -\11 f\ i ,-4.,,,,,b 9•. . :i• 1 S t, Fi.1 19.1 lc,,.' %, 9 / . _.. , I . ,1 , .. i„,j::: ..i, 1 , 9. ,r , i ri• r • 'frj r'•; ICJ IC Ka :: • II • , L.,,1,-., •• i I i , i „;- c • MI ISI3A ii.IV 'j. ea.'fa NL. a mei: um lb / . Is -' •=.- •---7.7-0-1, s' ; ....92 mi.,..Lai BIL.ft,Lill MC p..•LIM ,\ \ II MIMS .-1,_ I__1. i /i"d '\ '\ \ a 15 )> :GE .-7C- .. '44 . -:i ''' 0009-0 ..,..-•,,..,,, ,,„ c, , ,,,., -,...,6 ,c, , . . , .-p, 1 a'seecriwtsliti / \ . . . ....... .....,,. - /,/ _,:,_ 1.. 1-.1 • i _i _ __1_ , i. _ _ _ _ .. ......: ..,....., ,... , \ .‘, # ...El. ..I.,/et,i• 111=1 GNI KZ> • 7 r,„ I li H 4:1-l- i— ' '. . --r 7- --, , f'-')'-. , 4. MI. ix.— .........i., ...... ,.._1---------1 • ' • -- _ a vi,. N.- 1,-- -• i• -1 - •. '-• 1 65,U1-- IIL 1•111:3 MI -', , '"- , ir 4.. _Ai :4.: ...:' , ''''''.1.6 (.-... -.. OIL am au :ail • , 411,/ ,. ...,,ilr'1,av-zg ) I's.,, > K../ a , di ., as] .D•7,.n. ., - --.1 , V ,/ ,r .,,.? ,. • <,• lk alle-q11116 .. ..i . • v., ro';.,..i.E., 40? krei l' . •4 1 CI : I ! I -- •< L.), '1/ • , Ott 13 NC.: LW Ma d \\ •V ) — 'Ulan w...,;,....1,aLtalt.) tr:1.1i, ,•,.. ralittiiiiatillAw4074701113c -, .,.,%, ,4.\,.0..., 111L. LIN RC UN.. it ......7. , _ MS LC MT am No c C MN IC MI . lii/ In. '.-i .<'.2 •.:"›N ' IC inn NU IM.2 ELL ' • /,(.> MIL: Lail MI.1 L.111 MILO 114 i ,Ill El WI • .\'' rn;',; ' EL =al•gi le la-mi-,1 I 1\\ .,., • ' ,,, -, .0 • WO al5 lb,a• 1.7.- las ,-r: / 011010k: ile ""fti`, • ' \11 1 • •.• ,..,,s2 1 , , olLa. IC...0.01.11M1:_fL 8 imilw-, 81 Mt UM IlLiJ 1.1111 CI UM M.. 1 CI 1 \\ 1 _ .a., LIP Ca OP!IC Wu IC 1 );,i sW.:ad ha" . z/ _tNvmr• \ , \-- '-/-1 rl ----,-- I ..m ina/ cams, 7W1 Ocr.FE' \ 1111...- I i , 'HDC ' I -- -1 c • .., IMI Mli.i UM OW [MI MI. , , weir ws;,: :El IM:o' val IL:I ZIMI m.'., ‘ I_LIVEVvia ' 1 '''.1 mil UM MI Ili aii' NM NY \\\ 1.1di , . ,.,.. , \Alf 1 ',Li: IL-1:Ir'4J;111Ifill'11 1 I:111' I 1 1 i' •Lc.' ....,z, .G., ...4. ......,: 11,101/1 a - -----1 r----,--- r-1 r . -7.7.. — — ••••• • - t•4 3 AY , oi H'')S 1] . r--'----- 1----,• /-7 .111 .1 \. 'i \ I , , \ I:t ----;!.I ' i abf21 NI-- --4•-,i--. ',. ...---.• 1-4---, --•. --I L-14----:i- C 1 n - \ •1 l . r , • ' C, ' ''L 4' i----=--.:!• 1, le: ;:,i i!1.-.-,-..-01.4..L.,.t.._, L ! \ ' / \ \ 1 , , I,4„,,,_12 •, , 1. . ° .'l 1 ' 4 1 1 I • ‘ U 0...,I22 D X 73 \ / \ \ V 1 . .i.. 'i, , -,-.45..._,. . I \ , •c c c • .n. . , ,•,, , cr•rn n--T ‘in,i , - 1 , 1, 1 ' 0!tP., , "7 ,T7Trri , • I i'm `-----0- / \ ,' -7 .,..•. ' i ‘ . ' ' 4fr, '' i'''.11'.'19'„111"T''""a"IT: L-4— —— '---— r---- -' .----'''-' .-_I>:- -I , - --,---1,--1-.1.,,1-.'/..i ' •' . '',,..1.1. . ____,01,t. , • c • ,..._ . ..1-t . -.._1.1.111.1-:,... U-I.L.LriH-4 '--. -.,., -- 4- ,4-- ,- - —-1,1.- , I / /c-, ‘ A '' 1 ! \ 121 r- n ' j '-'-'---'-'-• ' ----1_:,-----1' .PN 1-1-‘ r---,--..--T-F--' P11,-'1;;• II r41-1,41-c^ -----1- _pi:. ,i4. • 1-•••-iti-trt--;-,'-p[•-,,:-:,H,4' : •• '• L--1-- ---- ,------1 ,----•- /o , ,..,-,..._.1„-....d...i_.,,L ...,..1...„_,L.._ : • •' .1.cl,,Lj ,1_, , ,.,• •• ..... , ...,,,L .._ —• • r ._. i , , dd. t \ • i , \ I-H . 4 A'''' 3\ ,, , ' . ., ,I."El ..0 2 j;)''' A '• I ', ! , . . 0009 -0---------- I ,__ . . . , .. .,. , ' ..,.....„ --• 3.,, „,.. . ill , . . , t'4 fib.'. . iP' '': `h: !' et,ALL REALTY 's'-' ' Real Estate and insurance : 4739%z RAINIER — PARKWAY 5-6777 , ,'r' SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98109 January 13, 1967. .. r` Planning Commission ''' Planning Department , s{``' City of Renton ti: Renton, Washington "` Re Application #R-369-66 ' 4. '`' Gentlemen: ' i;. ,P `. This letter will serve as a request for your department's reconsideration . ' . - of zoning. '''-' ,' In, view of the misunderstanding and confusion of the terms in the discussion: regarding .the above-mentioned appeal for rezoning, we do appreciate the .,'F ti.me you are taking to hear this matter. 1 '' It was also our understanding that if an R-4 zoning was not acceptable, h ''' :itcould be 'lowered automatically to R-3 by the Planning Commission if this °`.r :.'' . .was considered a more appropriate zoning. _ ' ;; Due to the.existing zoning, it is our sincere opinion that in all :probability M ;'' i' '. `:=y the property will never be developed to its best and fullest use unless it ,' ..):=ie rezoned. . x Sincerely yours i ' : ( LIS REALTY George C. Painsi :rs GCP:jmb - CC: City Clerk. , Q '' R °' City of Renton �`� . ,, ,:gib Rr�J. , c, y I� .., , , L JAN Ic., \,,,c)-f ,,, ,,,., ,.. _ , ,,, , , , v-i- \4,4, 4, ,Fyn .. INTER-OFFICE MEMO To Helmie Nelson Date February 6 , 1967 From: Planning Department Re: Virgil R. Fox, Rezone Appeal. Appl. No. R-369-66 , Request for Rezone from S-1 to R-4. Property located on 88th Place S. and 90th Avenue S. Attached for inclusion in your file are additional letters and a petition in opposition to the above-mentioned appeal. Encls. 4 O1 -v •?> 0 C.) • PLANNING DEPARTMENT • RENTON,WASHINGTON CITY HALL, RENTON , WASH INGTON 98055 • ALPINE 5 -3464 •<Z'C °4 t CAPIThk.° February 6 , 1967' • Honorable Donald W. Custer, Mayor Members of the City. Council City of Renton City. Hall • Renton, Washington 98055 Re: ' Virgil' R. Fox, Rezone Appeal. Appl. No. R-369-66 , Request for Rezone from S-1 to R-4 . Property loca- ted on 88th Place S. and 90th Avenue S. Gentlemen and Mrs. Dahlquist: The Planning Commission .at its Public. Hearing meeting on December 28, 1966 , reviewed the above application and the' request for rezoning to R-4. The question of rezoning to R-3 was also discussed at this meeting. The applicant indicated in the discussion of. .the' R-3 zone that it would not be suitable for the proposed development of the prop- erty. A petition from residents in the area in opposition to the rezone was presented to the Planning Commission, and a. number of people in the audience voiced their ob-. j.ections to the proposed R-4 zone as well as R-3 'and R-2 zoning. The basic objections were those of view obstruc- tion and .the detrimental effect the proposed development would have on the adjacent single family residences. The property in question is a triangular area at the intersection of 88th Place S. and 90th Avenue S. The total 'area of .the property is approximately 18 ,000 square feet. The Comprehensive 'Plan indicates 'the area as po- tential multi-family residential. The principal access street, 88th 'Place S. , is presently classed as a community arterial street. The existing zoning is single 'family residential, and the property presently has a small frame single family residence on it. The properties to the east 'of 9.0th Avenue S. 'are. zoned B-1 and R-3.' The properties to the west and to the north are zoned S-1, single family residential, and the area is for the most part developed as single family residential. • Mayor D. W. Custer and Members of. the City. Council Page. 2 February 6, 196.7 In its deliberations, the Planning Commission indicated that the extension of R-4 zoning to the west of 90th Avenue S. would, it felt, have a detrimental effect on the single family residents and would not be in the best interest's of the area. It was on this basis that the Planning ComMis- sion moved that the rezone request be denied. The Planning Commission discussed the zoning of the prop- erty in question again .at its January. 25, 1967 , Public Hearing meeting on .thel basis of a request for a reconsid- eration by the applicant. It was noted in the discussion that since the property in question abuts property presently utilized for business purposes that it was not desirable for single family residential use, lout would more logically serve as a buffer between the single family residences on the west side of 88th Place S. and the commercial property to the east of the property in. question. One of the principal objections to the proposed rezone by the residents in the area was that of the height and the obstruction of. view.. It was noted that the height limit of an R-3, zone could be detrimental to the character of the single family residential area and block the view. The R-2 zone, however, with its lower height restriction, it was felt would not necessarily be detrimental to the residents in the area and would serve as an adequate buf- fer between .the business and the residential. uses. The Planning Commission, therefore, indicated that in its opinion R-2 would be the best zoning classification for the property in question. Very truly yours, ; ,fr344N. ordon Y./ ricksen • . Planningi irector Encls. GYE:hh • ,I 1.1, t-u il oppgreed. ve .., Er 4 7 V , 11111111111111= 11111 '9: .••••' PL. : • imirm EMI / 1111 111111611 .... Inn 1 ......• 0 2 5 4 5:.•.:116. 7 / uni1111111111 s yk • 5T. 11, ..;-• :4. • •"'• •-• 5 6 • ' 111111111 110 _,. 8 ... NV14 3012:11rda 4. 7 1111 A OVII\VI°31441111 4410111 WIN= • s MIMI COW 4 .,..,, ... „,„,,., ..,„, 5 ‘1" 6 ISM MEM MI1111101 - Am" go 1 ma me....z -•.• 411111r II 111k,In 1E1111%11 ME mis,„; bie-4 WO Eni:411 MIMI 0 EOM > IPS EINIMIE imi MIMI =IP° Vas Dv, .0 17.Fra 0. • MI= 100171- r\\*\ . Illir".4412 KIWI I 14 MOM 11:11111renitri.-.. M I VAC. q 4 111 I i- 1 lijii El FAIIIIE i fill'ill Lana_ IMO .A.e• stiti , t 4 . Lim111a1s12' .12i1 z11e1oE•H1 .-.m.:..M.. :'P!4mm__LUm 0 a S ST A CelL••#C • X - EMI rtill::: ' 40 tg 39 #ce4k I 43 FA;nu.. 4 •- 4 -- 11191 1 o Mg WEI ST. v _Adam• 401.: (VACI ; ;.I 2.9 T'4; mins , it . VAIN 1111111k1 WE . -..... imma. 4e, v. 44 i-I 45 - 4G Teriplursr, IF: co co .... Iri11:11 if) clel I a T_ 111111-If 53 ‘1.1. ____ WA!• •.:' 1 - m 4' \ z zo '/P4Iti 111111111°311012' 2. • \ 1315,- 5T • -VAG -------- 1/ \\ cvlaiabz S1. I III < GO GI 6 2. A b 2, • < \\S\-\\\ AM . ••': III N. 1 3456789,0,,T Ill ,K "0 \ \ • y aor Ade .3...cz. , 5 111 1111111 --- 41 ----.-- 7°' \0 \ g / / • '' \7 al '4111111111 Ili , ,........ , .. , 0. . .....„4,:.... Or II la' T• WAMILVII-• \ '•-.VAC- \ \ \ --____ 444.- \ 1F. \ 111 \ \ \ \ . 4 >4!...... art - . ,- ;5.55' \ 1 1 51111 Mt" L.. , 1 -„am,..,., I cr;...... ----_.:: /9 .1•377:71n-r.,,,,..._._ . \ . ---f----._i - ___ r--------2 (^/ T V \--,o : .,:;,„: :, -;:.,.;-,,,, ,- ---- 4 „.,,,,,,,,,-_/,. ', \, ....-„ , , „.;,,, , ., x, < eq, N,;• ,i•-•,/ i'''.---,/ ciz-7(:-: l'. <N,'. \ 1.:, 1 "*---&„,1.--,. • ,' %.,:".. -..N' . , -, ,;,----.4 • .,/-' ,(<(,(,'",,,.<, '.,_ N ,.. ''ro / .\'';`- \ • , ,.,._ Ai . • -,. '4,i, • . 5L, -,---)\ . • / N 7....,i/ , i ' /;i•-/ < °10 ' .- .T '''>'•,,)..,. , T.. '/ N.., ----,..,:s.s, :1.1: t. .. / / , `,//. IA ' .,.- '0,?'i ,',,,..,• .'.,'',,, 0,,(-7 '''', , , ,.., Iv, ' ...., 4\,/ ' l'4)6./.2 '--\• - 'r / / / . -,, \ 4,- 7, •-it - ' /-.<1 u '''' ''.•) i ,•7 y— •- -,', •,,.,., e-\\y Q- 0 '''C.I., , ' 0,1\ ,' ' A\ , • "•,,i___., ,., ',„• . s,,,. '''----.,\•, . s 44 ..- ,, 9',i,/,//••.: . ' ..-,... -1-7) '1- '1'..V:'t- -•"'(, S',N, /''N7c 1 1..'\ '',' , '\; 1...‹., '.(1‘/\'' 4 __:_;_:_i_p!_4- , - •, , .__ 1-. , , ,, , , ,,0 . ' ' i_l I 5,) --=,' ! • - \ \-1:=_.--- ... '.41,' , .I ., 111H LI , E t 7 ' N'NN::'• ' '''.. N,T • : ' L11.11_111111hli[il i i 11---) '--H - - —4.--:la 11 L--i.-. ,:s-,-,,,, '• ,i, . -_______ ,p,• '''' ''' r___ 1- lit T..--1 ‘, N • - 1 ---.7,---, /, ' illi— - \ \ L .i. t-Lr. . ---, L-7_11.. 5 114T, _ (--- •7771';71".-1, • i) 117--r ,- r -,-,\ E t ' ' . '1'''..1777--,-4 L.--,_—1 -- v.T-', -.-L.7' , I/ T-,- WI li;1 ' :1, III•11 , ' ".- _,\ \ . „,................. .... . .41.•1-1'N't,i i ••••• . 1111 r- -1- . ••••, ' L k ,,, .; ,,, ;,, 1,1_1111. [. . , ; . ...• t---.[._, -- [ i RIDGE 5 I I5.." 5T -717,-11 1:77 II i 15111'Fi 1 i lq'T ' 11 \ • -• 11 \ 5C.1-1 T. TrIr• Tuiir,,T7,--77, 1....:1.-:. i hi -,, , LI, , ,, 11 1 i,,=-- '---7-L1 F\ -4,-4 -14-iiT4i1 \ \CI HillilliiiiiIiiII,1 ' I-. I,: .LL::_., ,:,__L:11_1...1111.1-77=1 LL.E__I \ \ BOWLING 57 -1 BOWLING 57 \'3 impuinnuNI ., , ,,, .• . .. ___I _i_ ! _L r___ I i , : ri 1,1,iii',11-,5,j ,, i, h. , , , i, \ Mil El I illini 1 ..... ... .__ ,i .ailL , II,t lir—, . ,._ - 4 , , ... , ...,...,_ . _-, -,. ,, , ,., ,, gi. --- -1-i--.1 \ I ,__L___,___ , 1 , 1 1 ', ,. 1 i i , __ , 1 . 1 1 1 i 1 . • til 5117 5T 1.. ' '' i o''' __I 4i_Tsil I L.'I I 1'! iii71„. ,,L_LI 5T :r___ ,, , , --\ 1 \ .A.,•74 14..;, ... 1 n 1-- -r•-•-' ,, -. ..a .__ _ 'I\\ ,','' ' ,• I 5T , . • ik T LI 71 .......:;. I 1 1 1 1 1 fT4511•••‘?tr,`'"R.,!‘ EL 1 I \ \ \ , '-<",''',, '''.,) 1 . , • --f',..-t.-- , ,1 1-'7 -1-' II-IT ., 'I .._ \ 1' \ \ a. ..,.' I I'm 133 I • ' 5.4- • [:.-..-.: . ... , , . \ , '------:6-..6-o ao B-I \ ,. 1. ---7•' 7, - • • \ , 1 %;2,';•'*, „z2.„..„,,,, i , • • . , • 1, 4 ,I ; 40 ;',---, "-‹ ,,,,.•••;;> , , . :.,, ,..... L. J. ___.., ,.. 1 . 1 .r_,__j,-,____i___L.,:l__, .: ...I-,.;4,,..--•;--,-1 , , . , ..... zo•- --51--.-- - - ---. —I-------__-11 ____ _ ____, \ _. .., - ‘.4,,rii.,...4444±t,. _4,44_,.4,..,..,..„1,,, ,,,,i 5 , .‘,4(1 . • \ , '' '; ---)• ' ---- - - - -- ---1 - -1. -e; !,- , •1- [•;;I, ; ,i ,JILL!, 1,1,1,; • c...i.,.,1___,, ,.,..dta•—......:,_--:, 7-, .--,-':' • -::_.:_:-__, H i \ \ ., i ii,4.:.1‘._si,;IM:\yi\,,,‘,.,.,, ., _., , .0.11,. ,., J, ......,..1:1_,. .E..11..L.t.,,_ Li_.,,..A 2., 1 . -,- -•' \--__-... --..9, -:• .;4-, 4• --{w,• -• •.,• --..', , l7;•i7"!•-:ri-T---in n-rr--7 111,1.'1-1'1 II'.V-777-;',••.1"-r, '7' ---'--INF -1"- --;:fr-- ------1 '-- , •ii•-•-•[t34H--4-'•--[ '•;-,•4[1/4,0,1,...4.,,_,,,,,i4 ;• ;rt:', ,, 4:1 \ -..?, . ., •& ..-,[ : .;, 5 1 .• , . \ --a--_i___-•-----'4 - '.- -' 1 -'" . '' -I`• 71 -1 ; " '.111111j1 "11•11•111_11lltiL.r1J III:''; .1. ._...I - \ \ \ •-1.:„j--1:j "L H t - -1 ,- •[---4-- 't -11,;,--1•7,--. ., ,- r7--,-7--,r,"7-,--"-'7:rniv '''' 7 . [ , "-•.',:.-.2 - ' , _,, ., , .13_,_, - _,,• .-.,,, ------, L$-Is--->,i...4: 57i-r,41j44-i44I-Ti-it+-'•: I 55 I . I '; 4 .-- '' --::1:' -2.- , 5 , ••).\\ \ \ iti,„ „ Y /.i 1.•-1411 II iiiii,lif,<6,AL2,tid.:. •,ILL,J ____L___Iii J._,_._..,1„.L._i_;._,=__ I :2, I , •‘_t_ ., -',;,_: '•'' [ 1- -1,1_ -1r___ . 1_111 p_,, T -di• 1 5 ° 5 • ' 1 \ / ' 4 -I, ,0 , ._„: .. ,.. - .1 :.--14- , t•.--•t•-•• .4-4-Tr TTT-1 FIFF1T IrTri.'ET.71 '1 T.,•7 : 'I I.-,1 ' •:) 3 I. -1. 1 ; \. 11'•ITTIrr11-17t1.77'7]I rT7I1 •'•1 1• 1 6, , -_, ' .•;_i . . , , , . It/' " •:., ,i,/- . .'4 • '' r i, 1 • 1 . I. I '•\I.4 F'"1"". T4H4 11H.• ‘ I , ,.tilp .,-- '.;-r ,!. 1,- ix': " '-' 1 -•L_Ii ',..1-LiaLLI Li„ILL;L.IL.i-i.._,... L__ ...._kc..,_ -- ,'' ', ;_ ' — -'";--11- -•D;ci 5K Y WAY V :,•"'-'17• 1r°'ll ir,i'-i-r•rn "1.'1:71ij .T.--- 1.--:L')K•--1, riZ ---. L ., \ / \ :.:-.*. ....- , ... 4. .1. -,Z, , -I,. '''''.. ,_•itlii]i1LII--4 I I "Iti 1 '' '11•11$4 !-"-:: ',7%---1 \ ! I i 1 C5)\ p , , ..--:., A/ 'I . .._11 _I L. _J,_ _, L____. ._ .,_,__J • .,' iii;.11 1,111iiiil 1„i i I udi.,L) '.._L______ ,. jf_rt.:2::12 1 , \ . , \ r_5„ D1MMIT T 12.`•••,_,11 r____I___I____,..._r_.T___,„.3.. _,...-,--- , 1..„ 5.y.-, ( j H_L_____. 1--.11 -- • , \ 1.•,'. 2', ,,(3 '.• ' '‘) 1 1 , ' r . , ,.).,..-14. i, : ... ,.„- • , \ :), , 1,,„,c,. ,,. < /---, -. 1,- ri,-,--iPkT*-- - , ,,,, .,,,,‘ ,,,...- ., • . 3 . \-----'-, !',kl __-- 1 ,. • rIll• „ .. Aka '•1 _. .L-i' ' ,,s...-: --i -. ol.... ' 11, '>' z ,)- '• ,\ L 'L'•'; z ,;--,- ,',.'.'-7-,. . ,. . I '',/ • I 4 I L . .., ,. ,... ., ipi.i>44, ---- gi.":- ,1 r--- ,k )•\ -Jr* .. 77r7-1-1 f. ,/ ,,,..: -(../' '•. - ' 'TILT ' '''' ' —'"'"7 .•-e"- ' .., . •,,-,,--V---isLIJ 1 ...;:,:...:„4..,.^,...—, ------,-..„::.:,, - ., - -,--- , '•1- ----, :-11- -1' 1,4= . ..'..`' • - I \ \ <c.....--2-‘7'A n :-I'.1 -et '' ' "'- --1'>'-''', ''..' „..., .9_.,,,...,.±_. al,,., ma, \ v• `i• '.,. t_._it3...il_i 1.a:_i_!, • 514-411 • . Z •77• ,s. 1 ' 17•71 li•.--„ •.; ,1T, '--r- ..-'. . '-, . , i , -.. , Li_L'Iiii.1i . ,, , 3'• ,- • _<tii -'-* --772- .!'- ' E 0` 'P3 ..;`• L.I__i___21,_z_12., '<._i_i__i__,— _ _, _ 1-7•1-••Ti f---T,'Si--1---1-1 '•• r---f•4 ...1 :--- i f_t.; 40 11,..1 ••• , I l' .. ....- G-6000; :, : .2.42`., -.. ' 1 „ ith 5 I I, I I 1 i '. ,.,,,,_! ' , • , ,, '1,7 , 5'4 .:5 1 [----;T ' : , , 14, : 1 si " 3 's'ssf.'•\,] -.- .4 1 ',.' , 7 s' •••;1-- rE-- - --- 9 0 V, i 1_3 _i 1 ... • ••-----: IT1 1! i 1i '. • xi. '1 , ,•5 i r5'• -, '11 ..TI i_ l 5:L'• . 1 " ''' ' I -'' ' .• :---•... 1- :nit?' ' , ..k.; .1 4 '7 '1 l' !4 ".4 I ' I 11>'' s I s rs,..'-'1, 1 I. \ \- -4,,,gs-r :----5- \'‘_2,.;264 I. ,.3., I' i L_; _4,:•]6-' en I —----- ,-6-1,1 •--- '. jr1 11 i,j''' ''-- L4N,G.,--p-,,- T71, n 1, 1..T. i,--,.- p 1 Dv ,.. , , it;:•u„.•, g 1111:7-41n.:- . 53 ' ------`-- ,.411,i• 5 ' • ' I 1 1 •.1 ' ; ' 1 '3, 3.55,\ -1. \\ ,-/./...4 71813 5. l'' 3,, i___5_/1 AAC . > I'--- ir--i7T- 1 .[. , 1 ..,,N.,...,., ..,,b , , , . ,! --i -1--, / -.--.•, ,,, re---1 ; 1 '__J F----• , 1 :::141;e0,i'',6!" t'_ / `' , 72 (,,i':,'...',: * . : ..0--.::*„'fr:...... •, > , ' ' - 40011111114/ Real esiafe and gnsurance _ 4739%z RAINIER PARKWAY 5-6777 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 9810S January 13, 1967 - Planning Commission _ Planning Department City of Renton , Renton, Washington " Re: Application /41R-369-66 ''; Gentlemen: i This 'letter will serve as a request for your department°s reconsideration - :of zoning. In view of the misunderstanding and confusion of the terms in the discussion,, ''; • :regarding the above-mentioned appeal for rezoning, we do appreciate the. „, time you are taking to hear this matter. It :.F: i' . It was' also our understanding that if an R-4 zoning was not acceptable, ''.it'c.ould be lowered automatically to R-3 by the Planning Commission if this a. . 'F .'• ' '`' was considered a more appropriate zoning. ''' D. e J.to- the existing zoning, it is our sincere opinion that in allprobability' E:. . 1. the _property will never be developed to it$ best and 'fullest use unless it . y - - - is. rezoned. 9 y 4s!_t.. Sincerely yours ' LLIS REALTY � �' George C. Pallis _ . . - " " GCPeJ nth''. ~,ri T, ' 7/0 ,.CCf,9 .. City Clerk V �ti� , V City of Renton �. l' ! �0' • .. faonora 'ale Donald ,W . ' Custer, Mayor: -: : : . - : '. Members Of ,the .City Co�anc it - ' ,. ' City cif' -Roston . : - .. City flaY1: ,.. _ Renton; :Washington :98A5.5' : ' - . •Re is =:•Vigil.. R. 'FOXe: Rezone Appeal.•'-.;Appi: pia. R-3.69--6C--, • :: • . - - -. . _ steque t for.:Rezone•.from, S-1 to. R-s... Property "lose►-- . '. . ' .. ., .: - - --teid o7ls_ aath Place S. and 90th Avenue Sr:. -- . • :Gentlemen and' ,res.• rpahlgtiiit..lt . . • , he.,,.Plainning,- Commission ettt,.its :public searing :meeting:•on..,, . : . Dece ,ar°'.'28.,',-19:$6•,, reviewed.' e' above.'application..and the ... .' . - :' request .for. rezoning to -R-.4- The '.question of rezoning' to .,_ •.. :- . • . • . - ::.R 3. vas' also. tiscusesed, at' thief' meeting. ' The applicant: - indicated' in the 'discussion ,of the R-3 zone that.. it.:would-._ - - ' . not' be--Suitable for -:the proposed. development of..the prop- erty._ . A,,petition `from residents .in the area ..in opposition. , ''..to the reezone'•vias presented to. the: Planning.'Cozmniesion;`•-_... . . ,-aand.' a•• number. people :in'-the audience voiced" their`oh;� ,- - , ' . • • • jectione.'.to ,the .;proposed 'R> 4: 'zone aa..-will as RR3•:and;R-2 ., ,, - . : .' : zoning•.. ,The='basic.:objections were those .of'view. obs - : • • : -- ti on. Ss the detrianental-'effect• the •proposed_ ,development; : . ' ., . , .. • .. _- wou•ld have on.the_...adjacernt- single •:family'.residences. . : ::The• .property• in':question .imi .a,-:triangular.:area at :the.:. . . . , - -. •intersection-of.':;88th Place:S. •and:`90th' Avenue: S. The.: ":_ " • • . . • total. area .of. the' :property is approximately .18.,00Q• square . '' . : . . ' . ',:feet, The Comprehensive Plan indicates.."thee area: as po-• . . -tentiii- multi -family residential.` -•The. principal access •' ' ' - -:`street,. .8iieh Plane S.,.-is 'presently. .classed._ass.,a:•:com nity , ' . . . ' arterial 'street. . .The--existing,•zoning is single 'family- . - ., :residential, •`and the property presently•has :s "small: frame ; . . • ,`. single. family residence on. it:. ' :: " .. . .: - The "p€operties, to:.the *Alit of 90th Avenue S...are' zoned . . • - ' • •,•- -1. and •R�-3. ..The .propertie►s to the. west. and -to the 'north _ ..are.:sorted' S--10''single family residential., .and the'.area is . 'for- .the,, .most 'pert. developed assingle•-family`: residential.;•. -'. ` ' . . •,.. ' Mayor 0. 'et. Custer"_:and . ." Members:of "the 'City.Council. - aage 2 . • : ,. • - February :'6, 'i967-: . _ • . . • • • " . • - Ian its: deliberations,_ the-. Planning: commission .d .• that...•the:extension .of 1 4 zoning to- the "west"of 90th Avenue :: .: ;ul , it, teat, :have ar: detriee eental 'effect,"en the sin le .. f ily. residents and-would 'not be' in the :best-.interests of . : .the. aerea.•••• rt• was cn" this:basis that the Planning itie:-. , • aim .,Woven-"-that'the •rezone: requeist be" denied.' The. 'Planning''Conaaiasion: cuss ed the :coning-of the ..prop • eerty in •question:again .at 'it*. 25," 1947,, P biic . • . gearing nesting;.on`'the baaier. of a. request for s:.•.roconsid : • .•eration 'by .thii .appli:cant. ; It was noted in -the discussion • . ,. : : •� ,that since' the Property in :question `abuts property presently • utili*ed: for ueiness purpoaea that: it-was.. not 'desirable for" sin lei: .: arami .y residential• usce, :-hut '.Would 'snore•:logica:llY... : :;...' •nerve as a buffer: between_-'the. single faily residences on' " tha -Vest side of 0 th- llae+ -- .. and: the' co ercial -p roperty,opert , to the.•east. of :the-..property: in :question. One. of ' the :prinoipai. ,objections • to :the props sed 'rezone by • :the -residents :in: the: area was that lot' the height and' the :_- . . - . • `obstruction'`:.of :view. It was noted. that 'the" height. l it,: " of. en..R-:3...zone 'acau d be" tietri eenta :to the •character of. •• • " - th "single f i .y residential,- :rea„ ,and block._"the. view -_: however, wit i.:" its" lower height:restriction'''.stric tion'' : i.t•'•was. fait. would:not necessarily, be detrimental;to...the :. •. .:residents i:> the':' area and would•serves as .an •adequate buf _•.-• , • •.• . • " for -between:the' business and: thr residential :uses«• The, _- . .- . ": .Planning •Co isaion, t.�Z":.• erefore, ..i ndlca�ted" that.: .n its. . ',opinion .R- 2• would be sae' west zoniraq": elaa s3 fication, : sae` • ` the •property. in.ruest .�a>n • , _ - - Very truly -yours_s', •- : .Gordon. R •Sacicska.n • " Planning Director _ ' nc s« • • GCE.s Y �:' t ?T IL t i .� 1' G� 1 -a • 1 i ;m �,9% III II Ali, a 1 I�i,1 ,� �� � �_� —_ HP; ', ----,-- _si �- _ - __ �1 ' .,.: • ._ 'i:li;-JL-7 M1 _ - -. i 1, �\ 1 i� ,C/ ! .-1�_.• --' -'1 r--- --_= a,;.... -1 r I i^''I 1 I r--r7. 1-,.-T'-I-,1.1 t ,t,1',i I,I 1 •r •, m TITT rrrr--E7V . . -- t. - -- I I e\�. V "^.;F,.. --y�'�-yw ���L. 7r I � 11t11 Ilil..rl i�i.� 'lli��..i�l:__.,La H,=ti13.'lL_._.:t__7Q-- r } rtl 1 1,1 \ / i� _ -r-r r-r _ 4 1 ��__ Z ST __ �I1 - . ,I.a ., 1�' 7� �Q. II-� �?7 Iil -7rT';T7-..r �, 17F_ . - 4_�• W I -r"--,4 --- 'r--{Qr—,`--� —1 Ijl �i II '�1t� 11 1 I.',II I IiT 1;11' '_y ' '��-s,��'_ i ► \ _ {r _� Ijl I i I J Q I \ 1'-ti i --.'.-, _--I H.,.`znr---�iLr�--1J1{ liliiii� '4111 ' A. .I Ib_1.; I_�I�-7. ; ..: ] .§. N I .,/ — -`l}---� J- -• -7 :- IC-J I-^ 1 1 r VI 122 ° ST i z > > ,\ CC ems. 1 I_ i`-� r� $.y I I (>1TI�I j`fC,T�.,,I11'I l i ',l'1�I III I, limp+ TP1 , I 1 ? 5 jam• ,zz�__-�T- /� nl l , L_� iQl l II1 LL1111�LL I 11 I III: ;I; ,11 L G-- r , . I `1 h 1 -ti; � CC o JT - ' 12 Q -' �`- �^ I • ' U lj.." I If 1 I '1 I 11"IrF;" f�,rr -Z".J a , , tr.Q ;1,\ \ \ / ` . Ih LrE I n, � a SKYWAY rr, z PL r f Y n— !r EL SCN o '�Qr {I I Ii T I 11('1 II'I © ' 1 G,. AVE ni -I. rim MI ',..'� - Iza ^ t 11111 III; l�I I r �rllil•—_.I I O�,.r, , ' ,' rr RN I 11,2r 7�Z �2�� 7 pIMMITT I c I a - ��'�F--L--, JR IJ IGH 3CH \ I _ 0 .1L !2 r4'1 —R SL J ,� 'C J :-H-- I _. \ 1o[A.vT !Q !2 ry-L ,l-L'c-Li71•rn ` A—. .. i+.l��)., \ _ '_ III ,.. '_y,., tor • • �o��� • © 1 `\ H-' 1 ,—U,,•�`_,.I`1--.#,+,• +�\, - 125 1 ]. z f/1 A., i '1 - �'T' 's `o` 4 T 1 InV�.> >77 r� -;, \ c 8 1 O .5 ` .. AV • L I ';Li ',",s.,/„,"'?„>1 - „ E•en. •a,ift- LAII ID , ‘\: .,. Mi MI MIII tall MI ,, ^ .'Cz a-.\.. / e r y '�� ..ca . 'i''-'m Mil MI 21511 tri' 7 • c` MN MI MI MB M f, :\ l. i I I _ O9 '.4 t z MIA `J .1�3 ,6 4 �1, ' a�1st l• • 1 .L ii --�1 i ,vac , 'WWI , .tea O , ,.T. L.�, ��MMI' fCCMs�I ,'`., r. . Ir _ _,\ �•/ ' 1,1 z -� '�,: l `�p, C5 TAD'✓A4) / !, .7--.' A- �, ,6�t. 7 r � i -'� s .y+ i4• •;calk • ,( d rt�,',f1 .'.Ail L.-. `1--{- -) ___ I _ `1 Li_j 1 •I'_' • 1 /-,I]/ . ., I s .�fl .7E • •�� !��® �� Mil I Q I ;n a .� Y. , ; !;7r-� - o-6aoo'� off:: 40;� 39'. ,�-i .e p. Prj � � , I4' 1�N E �1> >�0.r� I.�S4�-'-I I �' �' \\, 1 ^7��iW�o7.J A >j. , fro � .I �. r e 1 I -j ... �� / ,,)� 3"1s8� ,_;14. 1'T . 6 0l i 1 ~ 6 :;,..::, i ' \ > z 11 _ L_,r �'r a Y ,'7 + •!. ] IL 1 c 1> •i• ] z !. W ! I b Tit.' u1 44 . 45 46 1 • 4e a \ I r L: •A 1 1 J 1 i IaL`_©ply:. I \rtl 5 ;.: _� �° _.� . ' i ;, I.. 5 + ,, : 23 $ 1 O sr we !.Y - j .�� lA/vC ]-iT:l �l e :.0 3 �',`' 2zl l �_ .,,.• A. f I W \\ / ' � I I :.rii V-+I 113 Ilz Is 41> 7 r' Z v. • s� i.:•eIr•, A • 53 ` • r ti I ! IIc _: \ \. ,lz2. I `]i, 11 •\ ' j 1 1, 1x Vesw 22\J..� nil5. 31��� 5 .1 vAc Q �\ �i1)7 t� 16 1 1 ! ! I If,1 e a1] ' \' 1� Oc , 14 i> II leis > ' \ �\ �L ®' ! " is_ ep� bl ez � j�� • 1 I A/.C?P n4T WAYN qq ((nn�� II��1j 1� 11 'i ! I ( z I \\ I ' I \. \ F\\ I Q' I !,�rl4. tf•`�^l.d .y..r m p �i�yjT l`�"I'�I�I•F1 ..4! i/ _ \\\\\ 1.'4I- , .A:,.::az"° U� 1 1 I L l 1 _ ST 1 - -. -.■ C W 1 I I. , ,,#I _1y1 ) 1 I• I L - i 1, �r }. JJJ 1 I I I I } }\•f ; I r\i f II5 - 1 I I �'I ' I al N '3 z1 Jtcjs' > LII 1 I I *pi\ . . P�9y I cit-r s Z Z I >I ' I •I 1 I .\'1.\ '\ - , .C.V.1 l j�lj ��} 1 .,:1 z 1 I. , .,n c I. Z I 1 1 0 v.r f� p /0-' I. T 6I/NJ —`EVE I�• ..on I � \ - f: r _ 1 I i \ \ �G+ (jI ' o" Ir Peel; ,'.,,., i,!Jill' ' . I . I ' • I, IMP h ,III �I Oc 7 5 4' z� „- I I - ---- - iJ_ EN/ ' \^' 1�4! • II I I ■ '\ )`_ SEA,-TLE P 2{iONES N, c/NI zls %. ° 1..,', I c I -- \ 1.\ \ R �` M • ' I .. 'ors \ ��I, PE • >li I . ' ) 1\r-�� _' . 4/� aft j _ \ \ 1� __�_ Y-I H SENIOR JV G/H4 �}}1� u / w ,�• is==.37 SIR/• 'tn� L z! iligai I t J / I I +. O 'I ' - _� \ I SC HOC SCHOOL _y �� 11L___�dJ..- .. a- ` 5 arMr A r I J Y �, ..nr 4 _.:Aria �t r -y L4 4 1 J l ! ' ( ���"��,�! `/�i©OJ `� ti12 i1>.,� rr -- hF2 � �. Q iYwo / , µ� .. .: I ,}�. / hC=�;°44// 1 I•�LEW,a a i` ci _ _ !_,�_.� // 'l'a'4��..:-�,a� nF _},ti r,,11"rlf �. _ • viiiii \ �5 • '' 1:ifit * .,:O�i�,�/ ��,m�... ", 'J:.. I Fr ',d, Mal I ' , ,.v4h ., f�l 4 3 0 C�; 4.f. if s , p ify iiiim. INN iii,,..!31.. , .... . • . W.,''''drier/i/ f.;'doT p , /�`//y.�� .�� +`N` , � is 1�n7 ar©h --u' ��� iliirra c.L. / a�m�� ��� _____,.. .. / �ry�' ? / / W J \\ \\ Z \ ,\7 mac, , ,I. •I� .'w. : - . .,, : . . . , , • • 4 , - - , .• ......,...... •.. • 3• 3, . ...3, . .. . ,....,,,,..c:.. .-..:,,,;:....„,..i ...rc:., : N.`, 54• L.-- '-- . . • ' ` ,: • - Teal t 1a1e and �nsurance . • ; . , ".>. ? 4739'/ RAINIER — PARKWAY 5-6777 - z .' s • y • SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 9670E _ ;:3.?;,''' • :;rt .., • January 13, 196:7 • •�r;,; ;,i. :'`; r•-'::planning Commission s�. ' , -Manning: Department r" : fit. ,of':`Renton.. hnto • '1 Re�atora- as i n " ',". pit�, � - 1 1 Fn+:;f..�., 'nf'"::k e a p R A placation 9-66 's`'r` .ti - ''' ''Tji, et ter will serve as a request for our-:de artment.'s .reconsideration h l • ' `,�'$. rc �,-. q , y ,p ,. . '��'> F -, ;t ;r;:< • :of;' on • ;, ,,i-d',`• •In`vieca.•'of the. 'Ili sunders tend 9. and -confusion of the`, terms in 'the ,4iscussi'on , y'' '' ':: ▪ 'r'e`;ardii-gt the above.mentioned appeal for rezonin '; 'sae do .appreciate, :The ! r_.:• :,.c ,'-time',; ,you are .taking to hear this matter. :.{_' . ht. r.;:: ' a{t ,att:was..also..,our unde.,rste'ndin that if', en 'R 4, -zoni was not, •acce . :a`bl.e, .. .:A'':;, ,. i, ,a ? it,,coul,d'•be lowered automatically to R®3 by .the Planning:- Commission;''i£ .this - a:-•'''f . .•..ias considered' a more appropriate zoning ,,. ",,. r 'i Su wr" - :s ,r ,'� '.,",,�-;_;,.'• .;:c �l3u�.�to't:ttte':,existingzoning, ii- is our sincere opinion that.'in� a11��'prp ab !_:,, r ,: .r: '.' ,t e-property.will ne p ss'''' <s,' h`''-rr ver be develo loped' ,to 'its be t..and fullest',,use unless it''`. , • 3.7 ,Y ;; • • • Sincerely yours r:F �' IlYs r� �Y ). `.t. �; 11'y' - . . ._'d i:ti:- �, as ^6';' "`�.�:' -• • - • - .. ..;. ;7. 7•t zaa.; f t • 1c, m.,�r • ,d? <,.. CG.. i Clerk • - . C . �. u; '., •City of Benton '� 2\ , Y, E r` a • JAN 1 . :71"j,11`.5t "I'l . 1 • +I .ad. .. • • Honorable Donald 1. Custer, `-Mayor Members of:.the. City_ ` city`.of : enton e _ "Wilton, Washington 98055. " Re: : Virgil :R. . Pox, Rezone Appeal. . Appi. :Request for Rezone from S-1 to R-4. _Property loca- :.':tad `on e.gtn'. Place 'S. and 90th:Avenue .S: .. ._ :Gentlemen and The:Planning :Commission. at :its :Public Hearing:meeting. ;on December 28,:. 1966,. reviewed the. above application :end,,the:. • request for :r zoning 'to R- 4'. The:-question .of. rezoning:to R 8 :.mass •.also discussed-.-at 'this meeting r The applicant - • - - indicated in the discussion of the :R -3 zone that it;Mould : : not be. Suitable:-for,: the proposed development of.s;the prop» _ erty. A petition:from.residents in trie ,area .in .opposition . • to the: rezone:was presented;-.to the Planning.:.Commission.; . number of people in the audience voiced their: ob., jections to:.the proposed FR=-4.:Zone as.well as _.R--3 and R-2 >. . _ . - zoning. The 'basic. :objections Were:_thosee:..of view '.obstruc-» tion and the: detrimental effect the proposed developmeenti • would have.on: they.''adjacent Single family residence*. : The:property:.ih,,question is•a,:triangular area at the - intersection .of 88th'-Place'.-:S. land: 90th Avenue: S. '. !her • tatael:,.area of: the property is.:approximately:;18;000 . square feet. Thet Comprehensive Plan indicates the: area- 'ass :psi..- :- teutia►l multi-family;;reside►ntial. The. principal` access' street, 88th Plate S.:s is presently classed as a:community arterial "street. _..The:::existing zoning is•-single family : • resideent'ial:,. raad .the'property:: presently hat .a..smell :frame • single family" residence oni:. t. The_properties. to :;the::east. of 90th' Avenue S :arei zoned" . : - =,B-i send,: A-3: : The',propert'ies.. to, the west and: to the-.north .. : ''- are: toned S-i single family..residential, and :the area is .for:'the most part- developed:: as: .single family residential.. • Mayor :,i). We 'Custer and - . s. Members of the.:City •Cou ,ci].. _ • :. Page. 2. February. B', 1967. In' its deliberations,: the Planning Consaiseion indicated _ - that. the:ext nsion .of' :R-4 zoning Ito, the west of. 9.0th AVentue. B. `Would,' .it: felt,' haVie. a°detris ental of feet:' on the' Single • - - • : family residents' and would;-not be in the best interests og' the area.: It. was -on this °basiis- that the Planning .Cc i il.s� - 'Sion moved`,that; the rezone request.::be. denied.: The. Planning :cOmmiSsion discussed;.the zoning of-. the':props; - erty `in question 'again at its -January 25, 1967, -Public Hearing. meeting':.•on .the basis':-of:a request :.for 'a r onsid-- - station- by, the.applicant. , It-liras:noted in the::discussion . that since ,the- property in question 'abuts property presently utilize -.for business purposes that it . vas. not 'desirable ',for : single family residential•:use, but would more- logically' : Serve as a buffer between-:-the;: single. aEsmil.y •residencers: on - the west side of, t18th Piece::S. and the commercial- property' ' to the east" of 'the property in :question. - one of the.principal objections to the proposed_.-rezone by : :. ; the 'rest dente :in the area;was,:that' of the height :and the . . obstruction ofview.; It was',noted that the..height limit - of an R-3 .gone could'..be detrimental to the character of;- the single, fa oily residential area and block the view. • The R-2. cone:,- however,. with..its lower height:,restriction-, it :was .felt would ,.not necessarily :be detrin entil 'to::Cha, residents in the ar ea and would: serve:as:an .adequate fee between the business and' the residential_ uses'.:" The Planning Commission-; therefore, indicated :that,;in ltr , , opinion 1R-.2 wouid:_ be the best zoning classification for , the property :in questia n. Very:,.truly yours, .. Gordon Y. Erickseh . : Planning-Director; Enc3s. G1��shh. .- ' ` l �I � j/j- `n` _.�" '` -� Ili",,� l�7 -TJi— - _� ,,,,r ' y �' i I1 � j i rji ^ f , 7 r 'T l" - -_ _ _ O/� i ` 'tfl •Id_ J I ,"-1w` >-_y[- ILLL ,i, II .,LL, .�.. i.,_I µ:_. .,__ 4. , sTe1_�Z i2,, T \ ` '>- y -->�- . -iQsr--' 1r11. ,'I I1:Qt -Q. '� ---'i- t .I •I.�TfT _, , I• tI�y` fl'' II 1n'.-.--� `- ,I,,j -_.-w°,5?� WQ. 4 _�� �.I -� „I,IIII � I 1'' lfllf ICI l i,;. + 1 C�l l" -? '; ; � \ -• � � 1 =rr — 4O { II y WIC 11114A11111H;itltjli Hi .'"Ff="1. I '1-- I /\\ '' _n,_ C-_•�---1 ,KY I ��1 I11LIilili I' I���' ;"----=' _ Z,Jaz - / 1 {I. , � 1', --nl r-fir! EL SCI-II aQ IT r i I 1 lL1- L `P. .\ \ ,' L 1„__ qq:-' �_ lI� 1I 4 --"_7w_' j ; nSYiIpIMM17T II(llllj III! I rik,\ � / /' ' `, GlY AVE N • r -- Iall JR HIGN SC F7. I I ' I 1 I \ I}/ 11 l�G ���1 � 2l� \�II'' C •-! ! - -� i----{ ,I _ I �� =riljlita,' 71. L 1 Z 71 M171em TM�1 7 f'>\. '�l� r -�..-. ..`� l-- i.o� 1 PLANT- II I27� 71�1 t�7 l�f rRI ill. ✓ _ 125^' I }�+ za 1 ON '' ^04�� \•, - O �I 7 t.17!1 -az � �• Ja\.�\\` J`/ —.•__ '-t'' ' 9 k11 0 '. '`, 7 'J 7rI7AI ll 11E7 IFIN En MI MI ^WE L , I ei �a1,01 TM I✓` 7. •C \! ' I -_ -_ -_ D 1 _!4C, "J�� ai.11;:' 0 • .f�yz,{��77 i��j Z r �.7 `.`_1T t.a 3, u T. > M. f.7t♦!} 3'!1 7 _� r ���, 1 11`:Li_rill- ,, x• I, •!,• .q . ` / / [s rt.�r>' r�si �. Mil 01 Ell MO '`, `L�\ I 3 1 ' '��..-�W iiiiii � •♦. ,1, 5TAo,u',•/ I IE7 MI mi: az 7 -/ �'n IAt.' x IAC 1 1 • 1 I , i l\ I I-'-1-1- NI S 1 6• v1 f.��- 7 I G-6000E , -1 Q• ,'.aS " •1 P.$ •• ' i' ; r I - L.. I-'- I - — P ' at; macs, T� s cj\ 14 /31z 'v'ic 514S Ix � � 8 > z',..I:;C:i I. Iz l� I �z• IS � - 'I ____= S7 `\ � /r •�w� 6��;e,pf�� � 1�, ��f ,�'� as : a5 ..a . 48 P• a- ''4+:9 7>si17 l '•-•..) pf L I 1 iiIQ�©per. i 1 I 1 i\� { ,!.�.� j ����#/ c r sT �. d �\ / ern( .( I .rameiE ,NCSTt3I z 1 T. .1• - 081/ ,II1 :,,,,, I5T v�� \ \ I rr��s'a Ns 7 7 Jr , I z t 'ill Le W \ zm 57 "a'>. z fI1 W \ �>•er•r: o ma I 9'\. I 1 I e I�5 I• 13 z > ©®� ,' 53 \ ' �' .. yin 7 I e , > z 13 i z • s� -I I z Q\\ \\ �/ z01 AN' 11A I Z , Ni • :,..� ••r7i I 7 a`\ �i S. 31 s W Ica G� IL I �•17 i'I I I lb�1>' ^ I v 2 \ Iv' I ' I 5 _yP_c_ _ > I f, %7;t ,ice ,j, �I` < 13 \ dc,el. �Ila \ C\ �L { . Q I� h .c nii7 - \ I 1 I ' \F\ •2 l .3 3f1- 6,P 61 i 62 I A/L?PnQT `\ an z 44 if• �- '�: ' 15,, i I 5T I �!'1 'I'L�i G1F' A�� �,�'• I 13 { I � 5 l I 1 T-t , 1 �\ ' 1 NI 'NJ. I , Z �;�i • f �.i. c 2z i \ Izi Tj. s . 3 xl , we\ -�� y , ■� IA:i. rp,.i.m ,\ !. (: z 3 s v 21 1 ZOI 1 ��s� vv in �� t _I• .� ✓ OF c i 5 a > x , I I \ 1` rl - - (��pp !U=IN .VE E/N LIVE •5� 4O �` Nt� 4; p _° �� BLS` I I = ■ �1� N74`I 4., _r',' ,ATT�E 2 • 215 90 x' > .15�c 1z a -- H \�I\ �� RE.� I — �� 1 ,', g 3 it 4 ! it j S— ONES �� y z� 6 ! c.a `` F �Ii . 7.i Iiii e, I 'T// x llil ' TN I \ •' ,9' -_ —' , B-I SENIOR JUNfOR maw�2t ma, Oar! - •�' ^{ I S ��^. �/// �� .r 4 0 0 �I ilif - -l__"^ NIGH cuoo _J• 1 �� co; � - I a •>. j]� - _-- 71.11141111 SC HOCL SCHOOL z'•- S` + , L_ � ` I> z I 3 '�Si/ Ctl4 9 ,r1', _-i = R�I� l .L —� i_ ���, �//fie /j , laoaao 2" ! PIM , -:•,. 'IntriAllW : .:.-:: ",•17-4-Ht- )."., -• IF;-:"v','" Viliii'lf-r'--- AV. ,, I 0' 14 ;41 14.40: :1.8 frA'''ifilth. .iiii;rZil mor — : _,,,,,, .„4/ ifililit All%k Peiftiptiy, itt,,k•-$ - -..,,,spiato -- •- v4ftttgarit ,,.,* 44442,itte )4 •,,.. ,..,... a' Mill=11-1 rim or sr �, i�ei I/`` Awe�Il �► riliVP \ � � ram imp um:fr. HIM h f ,, _' '�; --ice N__ l sl I Iil0 �b`,'I_, 0�w ii / / \ \\ \, I M', EAR'._'- ''!-1--1 �F' .v'� I•p L(•//L! • • '' ' 'p- -- 1.--'-i' - ',i pAt, % REALTY Real Estate and insurance 4739%a RAINIER -- PARKWAY 5-6777 ' =,. SEATTLE, WA9HINGTDN 901D0 3 ' ' ?';' :J', January 13 1967 y ' ` 1 • - .. _ ` • q', }F:::: . fir" -:Planning Commission is P t Planning Department , City.pF. Renton -u Re t nA awashin ton e: • - -` Re: APP atio R-licn 69-66 • 3 _ , Gent lealen 8 letter„ n•_, •I,- •• - a request forYour dePartmentos recideratioti'''' �tawill serve as` . i .':-,::::':'i. '•.::'.,.,..- , ...;:. :r ;, ";' M1°I' �riew:- :of`the 'jmisunderstandins and confusion; of the "terms in 'the discusa'ion:x .y ;'.f`: ::egardi'ng 'the above-mentioned appeal for •rezoning, we. d_ p appreciate the :'r-: , ';'. ' time- you'ar`e. taking.to hear this matter. . • 'It 'was ;also our Understanding that if an 74-zonin was not ,acce table, '``?A'VJ`= `: ; it could be lowered automatically to R-3 by the Planning Commission if'_this, ' ', ' ?` x;':',' r ; •`• eas considered. a more appropriate zoning.. , �ue'.'ka :the existing ver it is our sincere opinion that in ail' probabil.f y: : ; Y e ;'property`.will n• ever be developed to its best. and fullee ,lose unless it ',, ,:.•,� • s.=J$c7oned] • , Sincerelyyours Fr° . ,:. • LIS 'REALTY Y" iY; - 5, • George..C. Pa1li s' is,'7 ri a .:;C «:,' ==C�.t lt� fit' y... x . .•,,,..:.: . • !. ....- ., • • \!Fb1 . ,.-,..:, .:. ,.,.... . ,,,... ;„...:,...... , ..,..-: jAN ).•(-.)'N'c\o--(•'.'1''.''..''• i,d?, • • • l'''''''''-;', 7 Y `:t?� S' • t .,.,..s •• ail r 'A fifi I . i' �i •Fes• :es / , /,, 1 / 9 1 2 Feb. 1967 Renton City Mayor %City Clerks Office Renton City Hall Renton, Wash. 98055 Dear Sir: In regards to the rezoning of 88th place (126th-128th): I am enclosing the carbon copies of several petitions which were circulated in the West Hill area of Renton. The originals were presented to the Plann- ing Commission, at their last meeting. (Since it had been posted in the area that there would be a hearing on this rezoning at said meeting, many persons were present.) It seems that something was goofed up, in City Hall, and it was not a hearing; the matter being transferred back to you to handle at your Feb. 6th meeting. The chairman did state that the petitions and all the mailings on. the matter would be forwarded to the City Council etc. To be safe, I am mailing the carbon copies of said petition to your office, so that you may seethe reaction. of the people in the area. Thank you. Yours truly 14jc27. 12-#ej-- MA Lester Saffell enc: . V.,t.rit: . "..4.1..r7-'••• E • '' . . . , • • . . . . ,. . . .. . 4&xiiir io? . .. :-• Renton city Atfidil/Pirinilig dOmmiSSidni : the nndersighed .Ownersi Are in the area of 88th place 64..thzi8th5i • . . whien is bein7, denSidered for .1,eZening frem .1i id Ri.;3‘ Wo wish td enter pretest AzainSt such reZdning for the fat/awing reasenst . .. . . . _ . , 14 This rezoning is against the emprehensiue pion Of the dity Of Rentana 2‘ This rezoning would be A spot zoning of an otherwise residential area: . 3i,• 83th plade is the : in ratite of traffie to Kenten And bevend for residents Of the 4ast All area of Renton and the majdrity of residents in Bryn Oawr4 tiMited access to Rainier A-Ve and .Ronton 11.10 for additional traffici„, • . be areets are td capacity uith traffic now • d4.1; Streets are not up tO tddays standards for added dftgostieno • da. Presoilitjtbp5grtiplry does hat Suggest reasdhable dff‘;street parking • facilities for Apartment acCupanis and visitors/ . • • S • - .- bi, Lititet1 dmiunt Of porking along the streets filOwi . . ' f; tlo. sidetjdlks for pedostrimisa . - - . . . — .„• • . , Nazi° :,. , ,_/;/ ,f---- ' . • - -.... • ii - Addre8s /...j - 7; '/.--(" . \ .. - . • ; • • . 2. ,--,, 4,2/2)-- • \_./t ( CU Cr( .---'(%.: 4,/111(11,-7,1 / , . . •/ ...._____ ' (- \------7 _Ey" cp ,;_-.. ---• ' . . • ' ''''' 2•' .f7,((,-,j • - --10 7. ' --ac /.-1- 6,1 9.—/7 — e - ' ( 'cif-- '. - . • . , . . _ . _ _. . _ _. _ .._., . __. ... ._ .._________-• . . . ., - • .--- , , et . . . . ._ .. .._ / 7 i . •. •• • .. .,.,.-.4;, • e,: __•:: • --n.,,z-,...,‹_„..., gl?h,,,,,,c,(,• 076 y3.-7.6.e . . . . . . „. ;• . . .___e-- „..., , . 1- ,. ?-.:,- // / ' 6a-m..4 e.J /.26(7/ Y ' --,„•&4- „o„e4, --/z-,.. .„, . - ., :. • ....,.. . . . , , . . •,-. .----,. ..; - - .:' A•g„•• - ,,..--7-7--vz , 4-tv a s / .,.'. ?.5.f i 7 -41 Sz . 4)fr-.J.,,.'i--)? _ , a„..,e... ... • - . . ' .'''' 77 i ' /, / 'fl- . .i 7,;,. ,-./ /-(.4,2 ,. . -dok-1,1 g•-•L., . - 4..- /A I a 5 - • --,4 1. . . de,•' -:-. -6•,:.,::.„-,:.-67-.)-(. .. ',,,.. .. ,,. . - . . . . 7- et 1.4-•fe- . 9-]a. / : ' - - -• -A • -,......,..- . • . • .- •. __ _ . -. .• •• -":7111110100111 • • .• - ef) I , 1 i. . -/ : . ., . f.•( • . . - .• .. . . . . :. . IS -;-'1(*--•/- ----,r-- ---\V' - - ' • • 9: - - . _ ,,,,.._. ...,--- -. • . .. . . :- • . date_-,66-7 • _., . •10.;. • _ , 1. --"/ . .. . . . 6, /,' ,•-e-ip.e, ' .. . . i . 11.4; . CPACO 1: ' tkIA,L. 6 diN II .o. S - 65 ti-k- . OC;'''''-'-zi .. : . • . ./..., jii, .r...)-,.? 4..- : . _ . . • 1 °AA' •,,,.......1.1-L-"\-- . - , .. . . ... t2. a.° . . .. - . • I ' , ". 1--.' ' • • . .. -. ' • ..': 1.. .., • . • 4'e a dte 1g/62 - d 1 - i/G`rc--: 4-9 ;s4-4. (4Wt- . • •. , ----- ;—,-.-7-7-2-2 . / - • ....,.....„4„ /, ,i, i A47-e ...;•?•-• - ,ey fy-' -,.. ,---, ' ''. —,' ''• .. . • , .1!•ji 17 rp 4it ' c'fr ft,2m44-irs,1 F riOh/A. :61--.. U - _ ,:- • • - . . . .cf - ... .... ... ., • • . . : -. . 2.7. -: • .. P7 03...., 5o./ .4. -- .fiittox. Wni... - , . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. ....... , . . . .. • . . . . • ,.• • , . , . • ...-__ . . . . t.Grr _ ,, 23 January 1967 Renton City Council: We, the undersigned owners, are in the area of 88th place (126th.-128th), which is being considered for rezoning from S-1 to R-3. We wish. to enter a protest aga inst such rezoning for the following reasons: 1. This rezoning is against the comprehensive plan of the City of Renton. 2. This rezoning would be a spot zoning of an otherwise residential area. 3. 88th place is the main route of traffic to Renton and beyond for residents of the West Hill area of Renton and the majority of residents in Bryn Mawr. a. Limited access to Rainier Ave. and Renton Ave. for additional traffic. b. Streets are to capacity with traffic now. c. Streets are not up to todays standards for added congestion. d. Present topography does not suggest reasonable off-street parking facilities for apartment occupants and visitors. e. Limited amount of parking along the streets now. f. No sidewalks for pedestrians. Name Address 1. a-;.�., a1 � = 7. �� e 7 Zaz- a/4 , ( 2. �.�/�. 8915 S - / zL sr 3. --4/l.,/t (-07 . /iL7t-/-'• /s l /�G t_. /f?',^ 8. . 11P�, p� .2 /V , AG vial 9. - ggi� jacti 10. 4.0t.„.vo eoPo S / 11. '� �.,�; 7 ��-�/ 7P(3%de, , / z-//- • 12. Slr/k /zg 14.� 15. 16. r f rz R_-..� C ..9►: 23 January 1967 Renton City Council; We, the undersigned owners, are in the area of 88th place (126th-128th), which is being considered for rezoning from S-1 to R 3. We dsh to enter a protest against such rezoning for the following reasons: , 1' 1. This rezoning is against the comprehensive plan of the City of Renton. 2. This rezoning Mould be a spot zoning of an otherwise residential area. - • 3. 88th place is the main route of traffic to Renton and beyond for residents of the West Hill area of Renton and the majority of residents in Bryn Mawr. a. Limited access to Rainier Ave. and Renton Ave. for additional traffic. b. Streets are to capacity with traffic now. c. Streets are not up to todays standards for added congestion. d. Present topography does not suggest reasonable off-street parking, facilities for apartment occupants and visitors. . . . . . . o.. Limited amount -of parking along the streets now. f.. No sidewalks for pedestrians. Name Address 1. 142 - ,A,I.J....4,e (9-1/(jee-ea--, " -ge3 7s.se? /.2.6" ---„.1.4 , _-,.: ,,, 0.,.,-,,t, ,,,,d\, ,,,,,_.4.., 7753;7 - ,A, 0- , /-!' — .„---r/--/ e _. ..-,..,..._( r!%` ( IJ u9-A.<,,X,d �� vc� ,O I.2 C6�`�r S-I, 5. Ci21'L is 4 . C. rrs-1. 9// �,9-. /its' .�.2L•. ...0:1-5 -1 z �/ 6. 1(6 1.tilt',... K. 41L 9a I . /2.& .f l 7. '19 744/., e_,__24 & / 6// -rk�% Z i '. ._ � 1....a637 - F " c'_iti � 30 - P.g g. , N. , ,,�. ,� ,' /..>4,3 7 al!,-e. -S.,. j-;-)... , 1. (t.,-,-r,Crt ,<-' j-- (7_,.)--c.,/ !4 / +..X " (]//9 /.)--e--- 2 7r`_t--_, .Z. -7!1 13.12. 1' .c-yr...-tvi-a/le,g;-,4-04-7 7 ''' ,1% - �' �i grOA 9410 • /.2.2& — 10,414.1. 14. r i 1 f �/�7-O/-�" //Pa-.T r�-- J• r�/_c-c3 mot=a�S ill ] A'!% /.� Lei �—.., 16. .6/ 2 a it,g, 1--ba .eff 17. 1 ( 9 v l �� .....4r✓ "✓Yts 111 - . 4 Janwiry 1957 Renton Cmtr C©`tnei'i'f piannin Co ijiissioei;Y e, the undersigned ©ones s; dro ihJoe area of88th pl lce ( ,2'`•t 423 Ath which is being considered sf® re- , niin fr i•.S®1 te Rag. "tie wish .:o enter • a protest ii such rezdiiiai. f02' the foildWii reasons; 1: .finis" razor thg 1s against the ediOrehensive pinii Of the City Of Re�itdn. . 2. This rezeniit Wi.iid be a spot zoith g Of an other rise residential area. . 3: 88th piece id.the math rotate Of t:c affid to ^tientdn and oe,rand f dr residents Of the ;ost Eiji area Of '?eiitdh dhd the Majority Of residents in 3rTold Mawr. no LiTi te? accsss to Fd?nler Five and Renton Ave. for additional traffic. • . bo Streets are 'to capacity; with traffic new.. , • C. 3t±kets a 'e. not tap to tddhys standards for added eongest on. - - da '.resent tevegraphy noes not suggest reaSena le -eff.astreet p r kin : facilities- .ter apartmeenit odctipatlts and visitors. . "eo`. Limited ameuht df parking dicing the streets now. . • • f o NO sid'ac;a11ss for pedostrians. Nh duress t iic� • :•• • • •-2 ,16_. -.....-te...44.ct ..6A_JiJfizteet..... . . /?-• _ Aaf..2d— 7.1.•:- 6‘e'4 . fa : . `: _ .•-..':-,>'-1•,.:--j./-•i- --i- .r / 24 . &a2 ' / r i ...,,),'-',2 "—.),.3(2,,, 'S/-5-0--76 r r U ��/f-y7��jJ�/(•Y/' [jL f fG�s/vr.- S' t- " ; isa•mirii� .. +il ti C'h l/n __ ' o� 7 1" ,'i J� r'""-�1� - eft • /c,/ �'' / . _ am �� :, " ... .. i..: ,•.••,,,:_,.:,,,..::•....,•.....,,.:.,...;:•_:.,..,,•:...,..,...-;,.;,,,i-;.,:,,i,::. . 7 . `18. i 1��.` � 2--C / z r. d `. % ) , 23 January 1967 Renton City Council: We, the undersigned owners, are in the area of 88th pl (126th-128th), which is being considered for rezoning from S-1 to R. 3. We wish to enter a protest against such rezoning for the following reasons: 1. This rezoning is against the comprehensive plan of the City of Renton. 2. This rezoning would be a spot zoning of an otherwise residential area. 3. 88th place is the main route of traffic to Renton and beyond for residents of the West Hill area of Renton and the majority of residents, in Bryn Mawr, a. Limited access to Rainier Ave. and Renton Ave. for additional traffic. b. Streets are to capacity with traffic now. . co Streets are not up to todays standards for added congestion. d. Present topography does not suggest reasonable off-street parUing facilities for apartment occupants and visitors. e. Limited amount of parking along the streets now. f. No sidewalks for pedestrians. Name Address , . ,,,, 2. 4 JI 44. /141,4444.61,14,- tk ii'47 i -177 TL('' at)(% 5--)4-- ,, e . -,'/,-- -- ,---:.- 7.4-7 --,..,7---',`'....;' /c->:? ./7 c>7_, I 6--2 . , , / ,.. , .-„,,, i , ,,, _ ---1...tt, 4- , A - ,-, i, / i •-_,-/,/( /„- _- ,.•7 ,,,-.,,,4 ,017/1 7. F,e Y i - i €- 5. /, 7 6. /9 4 ( ii- ,9';' --7-(' 5(-- .70,1,, -191, P., . ' ,,•-..7k-/c • 1:4(--- :4"it.141/ ,, ,,,&..4,4*/-4. ,/,,2 6-6 0 ° 0 1 -' ''''Cil:?;Lei::::eveolflij I ded,[ . -142, ''. ' il c? -s-414.r.-..=-1? ' „,,, ,..--• -* . e''' ....-1, -.t.;,,-._ .€ .. r) 9. /2 /--• r 4, ------/- 7b,„._..,„ 1 4i in ...-4,,,.."I i ill".0717. U-leefr:0 —.041. 7,4- 10• ..-..4,...C: ) ''''''. .77Seill -r,-41 (../ef--_Atjf\•°. / 2/-7..9"9--8 7 C.,-, (PC---' -4--1;— if/ ---/, ,V. 11• # - .1 - 17 ST7 /) ,- ..,t`'.e-,''-'-4,";_,,.... -..........L24);2Q....... ............. ....,..-- r. ,17 ........., A _ )a _ ?.. 1____ X.,, ---, 4, 7,- e - A - 114-• Ile P7,,,,, A,,,,..-1,,4'1,. i-- tr,fl,/6,' ,,..,,,Z., ir;: el' Y i c• i ‹v.: -r-a) —'1','.1 -,..4s4",4,. 14,6 , , , o . _ ,.... , I . P)fv- ,,,....5.................- -- ,- .../„,....— r) _ ,, , (;.:"- V - i/r' ,/,,5/,-,,' - ,,,I. ,.., -,- 16. ,-,(:- ,,,- ,,,/i e r I ._/,,-r---/ 1 , ; e -t t 3 - .- i f, le"..,T.'"--4., • t- i ',' ' . . - -,' 1 • . ' , ...,...__ ....._:... • - .-- 7-7- > - . 1. '' ' ..1 i• . . / . . • ', :, ... - ., 23 jtatidF:t 1967 ..............,...... gat-5h Cii:,i den-- fo-- 4airiii312; pm-mission: •-..,, . ...,.... •: • • - r- . . • ties the holerSighed. awherss are in the ared'of 88i4 01 (1.26tha4, 8th)i • tqhidh is beih -dohsidered for rezoning froth Sal. ie.R.,;34 We wish to either ' _ d retestddihAt such rezoning tdt the foildwihi teaSest •14 This rezoning is agaihst the comprehensive pith of the city of Renton . -.-- 24This retOning. T'Amnld be a Spot tohihg of AA otherwiee tesidehtial ated4 , . • . ' -:','• 5i 88th p1ade4S the rain route of traffic to Renton ad beyoh4 614:14644411Se . -. • Ot-the West ail area Of Rehteh, dtd. the mAjoliity of residents iiVBtyh Mdut4 :.• . •:•"•:., ..,• -•:••, -• ';• , . : : , •, • , - lAmii6A.tocess to Rainier kite an Rehtdh Alre4 for additional traffid'44... V. SttoetSate to capacity with trdffic rifin4 . ..,_ . . di :StteaChre hOt up to todvs standards for added edidgeStioh4 d'e PresOnt'itdpograph doom not eftggest reasonable ofkastireet parking ,.. facitW:e0: fOr apartment odapants anal VisitOtsi • ee .LilaiiSd:ahount of parking along the streets how4 . .. . •. . . , No didOltiks teir pedestrianse • .• , . _ .;,,j,-..,,i,,,A*, --,-- . • , ._. . . ... . • • --••.-•.,•• . _ Addke Os .. . - :• ..-. . . - '•.: . ,•.,:4-,•,:.-• ,i :,,.:i .e.,... --e-A ,ti,•.2...,„.:_..'1',:,:.. 1-.. .,•:----7•4•2e••.,4'.'.-:5.a. Ze.-c:,e-le-Z,-, .42 SO/ - . . • • _,,,,,.,,...1:•.::: ::-:.-4 ,. . 4.-.2 ../...,_,,,,,,-, 49.''. ,-7--"""1:4"-r• - .,;;"1:: '71fLfr•1:: . • .. . : 2. iew.:,,,,,...,:.:6•;.;64:----11.,,,.....-- ),./.....a--7.1....‘?.4,---<ifz ./A,..'S ,,/ 2 7 ./.e.1.A.0.• -..,,a . ,-,.:Q.--,-, :e:ih.., . - . . ..,_4... .:0•:;,,f;!,•:.1._.- cin-W a-14../ • V t4 x- • . . itaVe, . . - . . ' - ,/-:,/•- • -: -'-'-'-: i ./ 2/ ,,• ' ..,-- "" •-;''. 4...... , • 14,-..,>'':14 694 0,4.4 -,•-- -. „,,?,;'71_,..,_'.'e4,,,k , 1 , Sig fr - „...--ee _,...,7". J. 22. ,../... - - 5. (--ieersi..,...:r.,• .6....Ze.„0-z..4.44- ./ 41r6 - re- c../r...e.,-,,... .47:...r,..ed,ceem. . . CrijO 3 ,/, / ' ''''' '.. _,..,,---77-7;c7--. • . • , , • . : , . • • .. (4.1(7, - . / -7 2:2-6 --2-7 k!,i Sz,1f.-_-'i t-erZi, . . ; • 77- - , , ,-, a. e;. :J.,?.e..,-6._....4. -0.i .J.2., --.14„' -16......H -i 1 -2 "L' ',...) I,- c.; i'l --.4,' , '.11'1,,:*'..,.: .:;,....:,. ..,. .._:::: -...„-;:.:-...i.::• . ,. . -..i: 6— 12.50(-- 87 -- .lefE . ._ , 9::..4,'IVP •' # . ' -7.-- .. -.•- ••-• -' '"---irzi •- ....),r; • ‘, I:1(c.,,-- a• . ieitiniff.• -. . . . - •'•-...107-:)%77 -1.-e->il‘--1-!;.:';;: ." -54,-/.:L4-• .-/-7- :,-,0-,r.",) -,A arsi I- .7 — --(A.1--,,, ..S-4) . i '.41,6-2,4-/. . : - • . • •.:-. . ',..---3."./ ,./..5/ . .=-7./ :,..-_----/ -/ ,:' ''''' . ...,, . - • - -. i ri..._.---70,--A,,i,-,Y,-J---:: . ,,,'- ",,,,---;,._ .-3L,,,,_,...,,, r,_... 1 '1,-11*// e: './7"/ 4 v t .. 0 /-1.,...7..,./.y.-c, ,vs • - 't,",-. , 'N•, tt..."-\1 3..-7Z) ItA . .. 124" ‘1L \‘' . I. \-A C,, \1 - 14 ' • 13* ':— • ... ' lit:g-. ';4% 'sr'!.ti2,1 ' -,-, ; :;:'P--..'; d + '-.Prh .0' 0-91,,IT ...,44) i).OA 1,t;rt,'t • ' • , . • _1. '1 .i> -,:'' •. - ,,..1 i .' re . , ....-; . _ (_--- r,.." ---1, ....:r • --/ V. Ce"---X4.441`..4.L;'1 ‘,C4 qi.;'“-c.;"" •'-' ./.e ,,---) / Y -/ - . a4,4,x .. e..-,4 . -„,....e.-0344f.y:L.,-- --1 ' •-.);1. 1 Y. ' /Sir .._ ... . 4 • ...;...X.h C".."...."."'n • -t. /3.i. . cl. .;:-;i: - - / P. 2 3 0 '. f - .-1-0 -r - ...0 i--.e•cd 11-1 Civ,•, • . 774-I.. , ,.. . ,,.';L --1., ..,„„,...:::.. ?.>_.:-, . -, ..: . - • ..._;---,;.• - .16. r.)--/-1 .p'••.i.:,-2.1k;-.4 ifi:j." ',-.'"-C:-4.•-•-- '11,--i-',,,-,' •, • - ''' ;2:5.5 _. -:....• -- / (-,;;:-.- -- ig?. . • /t•-7eib-`487741 AuZ S. , . ( --los . 18. . .. • ' . . $ I 74- 2: ,t c - $ , -1(4271 -71, - •/ . o . , f. , - , • Janu1r7 19'i7 • '..enton Cit Council/Plannin: Coagission: thu unriersinod ounersi are in the area of 83th place (126thoi123th); which is being; considered for roru3ninf; from 3.11 to Ft3 0 wish to enter a protest afminst such rozonitv for the followiryz reason-3: le This rezonAn7 is against the coAprehensive plan of the Olt of ilonton. 26 This razoniv7 13ould i.)e a spot nonin7, of an otherwise resichntial area. 3a 8Sth oltwo is the :min route of trafTic to Renton and berond for residents of the ost All area of RentOn ani the majority. of reoldents in Jryn 24auro ao Lilted access to Painior Ave and .ilenton Ave. for additional traffic. ho Areets are to capacity II-1th traffic noNe co .-Aro-As al'e not up to todays standards for added con7,estione de liresent toporaph-,- does not sup7est reasonable off.astreet parang facititios for apartqent occunants and visitors. ee Liaite-A c..qount of parking along the streets now. fe no siduwalics for pedestrians. Palq-N Address :32 , ,../e ,• Al , j '/3/ (2 - • c - - 1'74 • / 1 I i ...assatintragoritagaWasfta,Lemm.e.4.....k ..alasordinansarazajece., 5 6 arts.amarCla.i.a.owssaweasmsger.... arborva.mapiparaernmessnes......masew 76, esomosswir 90 - , • e lie • 12 01r/WYOWO 411 91n1.41•PC5.1104.131.25 15. 170) la. effern0MOMASSMAPIL 19. f `I Planning Commission Minutes January 25 , 1967 -- Page 2 • Action : It was. moved by Stredicke that the hearing be closed; seconded by Cordell. Motion carried. It was moved by Racanello, seconded by Stredicke, that the Commission recommend to the City Council that the southern 423 . 97 feet of the described property he rezoned to B-1 and the remaining northern portion of the described property be rezoned R-3 , as this rezone is in agreement with the Comprehensive Plan. Motion carried unanimously. NEW REZONE APPLICATION 1. HUMBLE OIL & REFINING COMPANY, Appl. No. R-371-67 , rezone from G to - B-1 , property located on the northeast corner of S. E. 94th St. and State Highway 405 . Staff Report: Mr. Ericksen presented a letter from the Traffic Engineer to the Planning Director in which it was stated that the City Engineer' s Office had reviewed the plan submitted to the Renton Planning Department by the Humble Oil Company, and that prior to issuance of a building permit for additional buildings on the property that Humble Oil Company should be notified that they will be required to develop off-site improvements in accordance with Ordinance 2295. The Chair asked for comments from the audience with regard to the application. Mr. Dominic Driano , appearing on behalf of the applicant , presented plans of the proposed new building and photos of the present layout and indicated the applicant ' s willing- ness to comply with all city requirements. Action : It was moved by Racanello, seconded by Stone , that the hearing be closed. Motion carried. It was moved by Teegarden, seconded by Stone, that it be recommended to the City Council that the application for rezone by Humble Oil & Refining Company be approved as it is in agree- ment with the Comprehensive Plan. Motion carried. PREVIOUS APPLICATION - REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION • VIRGIL R. FOX, Appl. No. R-369-66 , rezone from S-1 to R-3 , property located on 88th P1. S. between S. 126th and S . 128th Streets. Chairman Garrison stated that the original rezone application of Mr. Fox (S-1 to R-4) was heard and denied by the Commission on December 28 , 1966 ; and that it was now pending hearing of appeal by the City Council on February 6 , 1967 . There appeared to be some confusion among the City Attorney, the City Council and the City Clerk as to the status of the applicant ' s new request for a . lesser zoning. The City Attorney had stated that it was discretion- ary with the Commission whether they hear this amended application or refer the matter back to the City Council for their hearing of appeal of the original application. Councilmen Schellert and Perry stated they believed the application should be heard under appeal by the CiLy Council before any new application :i.s heard • • Planning Commission Minutes January 25 , 1967 Page 3 by the Planning Commission. Chairman Garrison said in view of this , he was not opening the amended application for lesser zoning to public hearing at this time. Letters, photographs and petitions representing some 116 signers in opposition to the application were presented to the Planning Commission. Action: • It was moved by Racanello, seconded by Cordell , that the Planning Commission send a letter to the City Council indicating ,; that in the Commission ' s opinion R-2 would be the best zoning classification for this particular property as expressed in detail by the Staff Comments. Motion carried unanimously. • ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS 1. Planning Association of Washington Meeting. Chairman Garrison recalled that Mr . Denzer had previously been designated to attend the Planning Association of Washington Meeting at Longview, Washington, on February 17 and 18 . Mr. Stredicke stated he would be able to attend the meeting if authorized and that Mr. Brower had told him he would like to attend. Action : It was moved by Racanello, seconded by Teegarden, that Stredicke and Brower be authorized by the Planning Commission • • to attend the Planning Association of Washington Meeting in Longview, Washington on February 17 and 18 . Motion carried. 2. Letter to City Council re : Trailer Parks and Comprehensive Plan. Chairman Garrison stated that he and Planning Director Ericksen had requested the City Council, by letter , to refer back to the Planning Commission the rezone applications previously recommended to the City Council for Trailer Parks due to possible legal : prob- lems indicated by the City Attorney. The Council complied with • this request and suggested the matter be handled as expeditiously as possible. The Chairman stated that these matters would be the • first order of business at the next study session of the Commission on February 1 , 1967 . • 3 . Mobile Home Parks (or Trailer Parks) - Status - Recommendations. Chairman Garrison indicated that study of the status of Mobile Home Parks or Trailer Parks was more or less a continuation of Item 2 above and would be taken up also at the next study session. The following iLems were di_sLrihuted to Planning Commission Members : • 1. 1967 Calendar of Planning Commission Meetings • 2 . . Revised Planning Commission Membership List It was moved by Stredicke , seconded by Racanello, that the meeting be adjourned. Motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 9 : 17 P .M. • ,lei i Denver, f;ecreLdry) wy]c Garr rson , .-(`I-Ea i r_marl I RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 25 , 1967 • Members present: Gerald Cordell, Dayle Garrison, John Racanello, John Sterling, Stan Stone, Richard Stredicke, Clark Teegarden Members absent: James Denzer, Robert Brower Staff present: Planning Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Assistant Planning Director James L. Magstadt Others present: Lyman Houk, Engineering Department; City Councilmen George Perry and Henry Schellert The regular meeting of the Renton Planning Commission was called to order by Chairman Garrison at 8 : 00 P.M. Roll call was taken by Mr. Cordell in the absence of Secretary Denzer. It was moved by Racanello, seconded by Teegarden, that the absence of Denzer be excused. Motion carried. Teegarden requested that the Minutes of the Meeting of January 11, 1967 , be corrected as follows : Page 3 , first paragraph under Item 3 , ACTION, the date mentioned to be changed from January 18 to January 25. It was moved by Stredicke, seconded by Cordell, that the Minutes of the Meeting of January 11, 1967 , be approved as corrected. Motion carried. Chairman Garrison stated that he had been asked by interested parties to shift the first item on the agenda under rezone applica- tions to third position and would do so with the permission of the Commission and the audience. There were no objections. HEARING CONTINUED FROM JANUARY 11, 1967 : REZONE APPLICATION 1. J. DAVID JENSEN, Appl. No. R-370-66 , rezone from G to B-1, property located on the northeast corner of S.E. 128th St. and 132nd Ave. S.E. Staff Report: Mr. Ericksen presented the application to the Planning Com- mission and indicated the property location on the map. He stated that the Engineering Department had indicated that the existing right of way on S.E. 128th St. E. of 132nd Ave. S.E. is adequate for present purposes and that additional right of way will be needed in the future on 132nd St. Mr. Jensen, the applicant, stated he would dedicate 12 feet. Mr. Houk of the Engineering Department stated that when the applicant presents his building plans to the Traffic Engineer that these items would be worked out. The Chair asked for comments from the audience with regard to the application. There were none. The Commission indicated that they were in agreement that the southern 423. 97 feet of the property in question would be rezoned to B-1 and the northern portion of the property to R-3. Mr. Jensen indicated he would be agreeable to this rezoning. • January..1,,3, 1967. .. : • Planning Coinniission :. • ' Planning Department. •. City of Renton ,: - . Renton,. Washington. Re:. Application ,rR-369.66 Gentlej:ien: . .This letter:will serve as', a.request 'for your department's reconsideration of zonin• g. • In view of the misunderstanding and confusion of the terms in the discussion regarding the above-mentioned' appeal for rezoning, we do appreciate the • • time•you are taking -to hear this matter. " • • •• • - It was also our understanding that if an R-4 _zoning. was not acceptable, • it could be lowered automatically to R-3 by- the .Planning Commission if this was considered a more::appropriate zoning. • Due to the existing zoning,--it: is our sincere opinion -that in all probability • the property will. never.-be developed. to its best and fullest use unless it - • •- • is "rezoned. • . Sincerely yours - .' .0‘ � I? S. REALTY , JA Z ��- � DI George .C. ?allis �.: GCP:jmb :. 01�fR�pFti CC: City Clerk . is 4,' t\-i�K'S_ . �'L�= City of Renton v `ITz` `Cl! ' . i / ;- Planning Commission Minutes January 25, 1967 Page 2 Action: It was moved by Stredicke that the hearing be closed; seconded by Cordell. Motion carried. It was moved by Racanello, seconded by Stredicke, that the Commission recommend to the City Council that the southern 423. 97 feet of the described property be rezoned to B-1 and the remaining northern portion of the described property be rezoned R-3 , as this rezone is in agreement with the Comprehensive Plan. Motion carried unanimously. NEW REZONE APPLICATION 1. HUMBLE OIL & REFINING COMPANY, Appl. No. R-371-67 , rezone from G to B-1, property located on the northeast corner of S.E. 94th St. and State Highway 405. Staff Report: Mr. Ericksen presented a letter from the Traffic Engineer to the Planning Director in which it was stated that the City Engineer' s Office had reviewed the plan submitted to the Renton Planning Department by the Humble Oil Company, and that prior to issuance of a building permit for additional buildings on the property that Humble Oil Company should be notified that they will be required to develop off-site improvements in accordance with Ordinance 2295. The Chair asked for comments from the audience with regard to the application. Mr. Dominic Driano, appearing on behalf of the applicant, presented plans of the proposed new building and photos of the present layout and indicated the applicant' s willing- ness to comply with all city requirements. Action: . It was moved by Racanello, seconded by Stone, that the hearing be closed. Motion carried. It was moved by Teegarden, seconded by Stone, that it be recommended to the City Council that the application for rezone by Humble Oil & Refining Company be approved as it is in agree- ment with the Comprehensive Plan. Motion carried. PREVIOUS APPLICATION - REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION VIRGIL R. FOX, Appl. No. R-369-66 , rezone from S-1 to R-3 , property located on 88th Pl. S. between S. 126th and S. 128th Streets. Chairman Garrison stated that the original rezone application '' of Mr. Fox (S-1 to R-4) was heard and denied by the Commission on December 28 , 1966; and that it was now pending hearing of appeal by the City Council on February 6 , 1967. There appeared to be some confusion among the City Attorney, the City Council and the City Clerk as to the status of the applicant' s new request for a lesser zoning. The City Attorney had stated that it was discretion- ary with the Commission whether they hear this amended application or refer the matter back to the City Council for their hearing of appeal of the original application. Councilmen Schellert and Perry stated they believed the application should be heard under appeal by the City Council before any new application is heard r / _ // Planning Commission Minutes January 25, 1967 Page 3 by the Planning Commission. Chairman Garrison said in view of this , he was not opening the amended application for lesser zoning to public hearing at this time. Letters, photographs and petitions representing some 116 signers in opposition to the application were presented to the Planning Commission. Action: It was moved by Racanello, seconded by Cordell, that the Planning Commission send a letter to the City Council indicating that in the Commission' s opinion R-2 would be the best zoning classification for this particular property as expressed in detail by the Staff Comments. Motion carried unanimously. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS 1. Planning Association of Washington Meeting, Chairman Garrison recalled that Mr. Denzer had previously been designated to attend the Planning Association of Washington Meeting at Longview, Washington, on February 17 and 18. Mr. Stredicke stated he would be able to attend the meeting if authorized and that Mr. Brower had told him he would like to attend. Action: It was moved by Racanello, seconded by Teegarden, that Stredicke and Brower be authorized by the Planning Commission to attend the Planning Association of Washington Meeting in Longview, Washington on February 17 and 18 . Motion carried. 2. Letter to City Council re: Trailer Parks and Comprehensive Plan. Chairman Garrison stated that he and Planning Director Ericksen had requested the City Council, by letter, to refer back to the Planning Commission the rezone applications previously recommended to the City Council for Trailer Parks due to possible legal prob- lems indicated by the City Attorney. The Council complied with this request and suggested the matter be handled as expeditiously as possible. The Chairman stated that these matters would be the first order of business at the next study_ session of the Commission on February 1, 1967. 3. Mobile Home Parks (or Trailer Parks) - Status - Recommendations. Chairman Garrison indicated that study of the status of Mobile Home Parks or Trailer Parks was more or less a continuation of Item 2 above and would be taken up also at the next study session. The following items were distributed to Planning Commission Members : 1. 1967 Calendar of Planning Commission. Meetings 2. Revised Planning Commission Membership List It was moved by Stredicke, seconded by Racanello, that the meeting be adjourned. Motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 9 :17 P.M. Ja- s Denier, Secretar Dayle Garrison, Chairman v�r,. n c\ �. Renton, Washington 98055 January 25, 1967 City of Renton Planning Commission Renton, Washington Gentlemen: We protest the request for a zone change from S-1 to R-3 of the property between South 126th Street and South 128th Street and 88th Place South as it is contrary to the best interest of the public. Already 90th Street is incapable of handling the heavy traffic feeding into the Bryn Mawr area. Any building of an apartment house complex would further increase the hazard to the foot traffic and the residents living in this area. The 40-foot or three-story limit as allowed by the R-3 zoning would also appreciably damage the property values of the many well-kept homes facing along this area. Very truly yours, -7,--)77r- 2174,7 ( 4(V; Mr. & Mrs. Kenneth L. Harvey 12807 - 89th South Renton, Washington 98055 -2.----->., % 6 6-1 I 4-J tint' T- - - )c ot.1. ./.18, tauPc). Arc', th E 7+crtv. rA., p.g.raihi. ay. J () • ..t)..-€. kst.z.Vei .K. .ui.,ify% 17.3 t. 5,-;" . 2 1 lir. . (kii-WkAttnenco.t,j cx.r al- Altd14.. 00-kk.c.v.u6.&. !1/4- : ikf OtAit, Wt (WA Ot.i.kp tbiiiNCLA/4.i.4. --A-0 AV cc. t) . ., .A.LOcr. a Lledirrid4404 0 0-41.C.1 \-Jnx.)piiiii-6 401-• CAS 644 D eAviviLt.1.6 v)5.1.,cie 7 -1/rt E. V- __ .a 4.7yr,c-_- imArevuu,e. ..uy\ - VI.4.4% •-rnix.414.\\L-cYLVA 00c1 ik.,Wisri- 0,:" Cubtr.c.-.4"4.1 Cru...6 .A.Psfau-LAAArt.LAkkm J.Afti, Ain clAd j:CIPAti — afc.A.C.St• i 01.5 ''' W.T.". ai 0 C524A1 ar•ft cki.rAA -LVI t rlitfc.u.r, r---, , 6)Eteuo j rti,C0.41VtgAlVile-- j-kir& I,--),LA.4.4-CLIN j i\A•aicin 42.W1.j To F.Oet udvi.A., CLL . . cxiv.,c.,, lk.v".4.1-6A, .k.v-CK.W.. la.164Liti ...I.AkspoLArAkik. el% ci.ipt-,-.L.T.J.,. .440 CLA4 CA..900-a‘iwN.c:-4dt uti.KAIL, . ,_ , ‘‘,fri &IONA"' ci JOtive-Uto N3 ji4v4;s11,,, . D Ji-Cial . 3 i),...4-064-2a" 60 ,P6'42k F)-(4)tir Cl?'"AfvujILA-'- . 4 -Lt c,,...‘„, c„, ,, ,a,. , . 1 J .L. lekCulik, TA..) f i ---.7..4 5--:c5,- --- . — -ii-. 11•01---...- /4.P....11 L.crifk.A.LagA.04.4-i r."9 zi .t." . t+.., c hz.i, ,g),- <>•:`- 4-,`.-, ,C.-c.,-;. f ' ) 4...-51,.‘4 ,•.C.' _;:: 1 A u. 4: .klatxze ( Ate -)c410 , ‘ ' 14j°c 8s ii, . WAIVA(SW . Ili ctia.1.0 , 6 V_t,r, d 1- ��- ai C r 4 ( 0c- c,t,Ay c) 24 January 1967 Renton City Council/Planning Commission: We, the undersigned owners, are in the area of 88th place (126th-128th) , which is being considered for rezoning from S-1 to R-3. We wish to enter a protest against such rezoning for the following reasons: 1. This rezoning is against the comprehensive plan of the City of Renton. 2. This rezoning would be a spot zoning of an otherwise residential area. 3. 88th place is the main route of traffic to Renton and beyond for residents of the West Hill area of Renton and the majority of residents in Bryn Mawr. a. Limited access to Rainier Ave and Renton Ave for additional traffic. b. Streets are to capacity with traffic now. c. Streets are not up to todays standards for added congestion. d. Present topography does not suggest reasonable off-street parking facilities for apartment occupants and visitors. e. Limited amount of parking along the streets now. f. No sidewalks for pedestrians. Name Address A 1. 7 z) 6---/eti 0, j ii�, / c2 L1/3 v�8�` , e-,), 2. )J24,-1 l -& kr-in.-XI r) / ‘;,f ? -ciP . ,ems 3. .---/---?_ec}c---/I-Va-7/.6 4.�, __ -,u& - / 65/7 a xx_17,-0,4__.) S•71;5,_ %,,,.,,y.,:.,-; . ( -i 'Z�) / oY 7 ei D�� 6 r11-: hi J:fir,vi atrA14-1 OA / a 74 -,- (-57 6.i t-i-iz 7. /1 . •• ai/iI/L C l/l/ �N✓ / A I a cJ �/ ' old. /� o4-1 �- 8. p.. fll — UL/+� I+T-V 0 ( - fir Gam('C Jt L�� f� 9. ti -�1 ck - -�-� /) E k t I 1( cam(* 10. ��&€'44. 2i �/'r �'/ f d© �- 19 z- ,�.�• Liekg,,,,, gif,\AA&\-)0 G11. � `� C6 1��10 S _ 65,G� ' U�-l�" 12(I 6.AA . �'XL /L- ) qU`— ` ' .- of4I 7J(D � 3, l / 0 Yr 1 . 14. ‘7,/2-,/z/fiz, /1,frt — ,--- . . , 16. r A .-Se ' // '._ 17. �`,Q c "� T .i .5 n. f°Zi— � Fa.11 i. fin 6,9 18. 23 January 1967 Renton City Council: We, the undersigned owners, are in the area of 88th place (126th-128th) , which is being considered for rezoning from S-1 to R-3. We wish to enter a protest against such rezoning for the following reasons: 1. This rezoning is against the comprehensive plan of the City of Renton. 2. This rezoning would be a spot zoning of an otherwise residential area. 3. 88th place is the main route of traffic to Renton and beyond for residents of the West Hill area of Renton and the majority of residents in Bryn Mawr. a. Limited access to Rainier Ave. and Renton Ave. for additional traffic. b. Streets are to capacity with traffic now. c. Streets are not up to todays standards for added congestion. d. Present topography does not suggest reasonable off-street parking, facilities for apartment occupants and visitors. e. Limited amount of parking along the streets now. f. No sidewalks for pedestrians. Name Address 1. , d L9-91. (7 _ gc37 / ' ` q A2. �377 -tea, /,6 3. A--)-(1_,-,...„.. A (/� r 7t4 11 13-lrc-0— 7t 9 O 5.6 l f- y r "1 SA k `f l I __„, ) 9“ SrC , „tint,, 5. _G, -4 a . Laren 19/1 Fr- /,z4- . 11-• ri0,424; 6. il' h--k-e)l - K 471 c /01)\,AL,G g90 T 2. /z6 xtt ke-b---147: 7. (4) // ', i' f44,1:,)l �ci_ /! �Si LJ�' • ///ni'A6✓�i 8. ��7aez.���/t/�Z �-+� % // , -�is ✓' => 9. (1_/"YbliJ (3,/SAL-0/f f 4, / " t� ` ai.te - 41 . k.,,,,2�i 10. (0 t5,,, ,, /-2/:,' 7-- .cy'c`'$ (2 . 5,. i „<,,_,,7,-- 11. ( e_,,y--%s Ci,C' / /4 (,(c y a.)---e,1z,•, 12. 0467,r� �'ra�..---.e %' 5-8/6 .7 /1,.�_„- 1 _� ,,� �/ 13. �''d1/2/.,; ( ) ..L i rl 96� 21v . / 6'f0,),,,,,:„i �� 1%427,,, . .'-,,e-e__-_e___"\--; z/1;-,,,r / e, ) ./-2,p-6) er, 767/6 _....vY.e.) --2_„( 7[..---z_—,___i je 16. . .1 4 4 > 77- - , '.C1 eg/1%C% .i/ g•a(.1---- 1 (') 7416 , -k 6-4 , ` .� \ , • �4 January 1967 Renton City Council/Planning Commission: We, the undersigned owners, are in the area of 88th place (126th-128th), which is being considered for rezoning from S-1 to R-3. We wish to enter a protest against such rezoning for the following reasons: 1. This rezoning is against the comprehensive plan of the City of Renton. 2. This rezoning would be a spot zoning of an other wise residential area. 3. 88th place is the main route of traffic to Benton and beyond for residents of the West Hill area of Renton and the majority of residents in Bryn Mawr. a. Limited access to Rainier Ave and Renton Ave. for additional traffic. b. Streets are to capacity with traffic now. c. Streets are not up to todays standards for added congestion. d. Present topography does not suggest reasonable off-street parking facilities for apartment occupants and visitors. e.• Limited amount of parking along the streets now. f. No sidewalks for pedestrians. Name Address 1. �': / .07— �G1 6'G2`- . . 2. , <J J cr/z�2 /26 23 5.y�7-� .4t' - 3.fib 0a /.vf.2d- ate- J . /4,2r:_,,1,14-t,c_ „,.." ,4,--e-xt- _/,, 7 if 6- /9, 416- 5. „ � te,% c-2,2. is -},.1,,- - TAG' 2 5` / 52" 6:'. _i'Cli-Acel (1---) - " ' 1 ' 14- , - 7. 41,, 4.- cv �`. ,,me / 10i 1 c 6 h . 8. C�c`�^-t,.- -�� V - (Z C. S 9. 'Am - 1)671-e----44.):_ /11167 P.' 10.) fizz ? 1 - - = 11. (.r/-f-, - - 2 _3 ' X 74 ..r 12. `- 1 7 1- ,- S-k _ S-e 13. G!- ^ �� �' S/- e.:P d tSa . 15. 4. .1?- ie / ' / � 1/C Pi'�.�.- crew 16 ../4 `- 41. era2/o % 1c /-41 %i oa%' •TGx`e vi 17. , % 2� e $ P ; � ' v z 18. F -�,/ 2- �� / � z'�'L_, 19. % c 92 /26, 5 - F G `a'._e j 66 7 23 January 1967 Renton City Council: We, the undersigned owners, are in the area of 88th pl (126th-128th), which is being considered for rezoning from S-1 to R-3. We wish to enter a protest against such rezoning for the following reasons: 1. This rezoning is against the comprehensive plan of the City of Renton. 2. This rezoning would be a spot zoning of an otherwise residential area. 3. 88th place is the main route of traffic to Renton and beyond for residents of the West Hill area of Renton and the majority of residents, in Bryn Mawr. a. Limited access to Rainier Ave. and Renton Ave. for additional traffic. b. Streets are to capacity with traffic now. c. Streets are not up to todays standards for added congestion. d. Present topography does not suggest reasonable off-street parking facilities for apartment occupants and visitors. e. Limited amount of parking along the streets now. f. No sidewalks for pedestrians. Name Address 1. .e e" `g ...,vfi" _ j,9YY 2 4("61:. fre. 2. 4).tiLsfru /`I�2-J "17 6. S.; 63r1, 3• / 7 .P''-&-n t'`t„...r f A/ 4:#2,7.7„,z �.„ /C�I O / ��ar''`fi r 1� • fi i/ r '�„ �, �n e S. ram\.. � , _�; ,/ ;p r. ,'4:'t.:, 4=74/ '?'` \i%) 6. .f: `_.-_,, 77! /_3 6 r. L�r), /� l ,.ram 61 P a.,r f��i �I`-s_ 7. I/ ,,� 7 _ p , P 8• e�° o� �� �,!/' �°°V ,,� t yam,_'` :.-r'� 1 d���s Pl �t�' Fs ift 9. Ld� .�./_.,{ G�•�tl rK r _ n r".�x , a / ff 10. .�__:�: i ,,. , mot. � 1 ,-y�.ark :�'"�:d\�. / qCj {�� ' 11. ! . ,01 —7"1/7" 13. CAA .✓r``, �' ;� `A« ' l/� ` �- .c'�,e2 7 -=A v 1 z-3_ W - r s 15. `��% �q:);�� �� �4 . ; /62 6 a 0" eab','7 ✓ 16. c�4 �'° .c. ,/f; 01 /�1� I� ,/ r 1/'`� • 23 January 1967 Renton City Council: Planning Commission: We, the undersigned owners, are in the area of 88th pl (126th-128th),r which is being considered for rezoning from S-1 to R-3. We wish to enter a protest against such rezoning for the following reasons: 1. This rezoning is against the comprehensive plan of the City of Renton. 2. This rezoning would be a spot zoning of an otherwise residential area. 3. 88th place is the main route of traffic to Renton and beyond for residents of the West Hill area of Renton and the majority of residents in Bryn Mawr.. a. Limited access to Rainier Ave and Renton Ave. for additional traffic. b. Streets are to capacity with traffic now. c. Streets are not up to todays standards for added congestion. d. Present topography does not suggest reasonable off-street parking facilities for apartment occupants and visitors. e. Limited amount of parking along the streets now. f. No didewalks for pedestrians. Name Address 09 1. //.�.��_ " /,% /7 ''. '—( .6 L A2 L (1/ —P l � eJ., �fr` ?)/ v/) %.-� ,i� J:t _ _ ✓- p.. •+� J it 7 .. ."r p`1 / 2. 74/t A i 2-.1-, .., A , ,.,. ,,,,..>a. rt%:1. a. .. /1 :r1. 2-E,.FQ�� 3. 1' i4'(.�?/4. ��. -if/at/ill t/ill at-�./ /..'',9 /h (r/ -�'f ( 0`tie, e%his. 44f,45,1.2 4. ,...-✓,.'`!1,, ..e_ l;� d:-, , `4.:'M 47_,?<.:4 /, 2,-5 Y- /� )i -(>'..P e.d°,• k'"r:_� . f.'�- _ �f \ !�/ rg � �•° '' ! c\ 5. C1�,,-di C —.,-._ er.0.. f AZ j if el'. e -J �_ , \ v 6. ( /,y c 44.. .. 2--E��-ram- -/ it" 11 4- < _r /�Z 1"(-- ',�% ;� , i 7. . ""/ %64 . 8. 7 '7../t/G-.n! ) 21 i',L�✓! w.J ( c-G .� // X ) O �-'-,,,r,.,Aa! \9. 1411A fr . ,. . I / (— 4-1-A r i ' ...ce 1, , �, " .-- ty(.9.�-/ //r 4..'.' ."�''.';ilL..--.4'1 f '<,• .. > ,4-t`°aI I' ,01 r/' A •' _ 'i..,'.CS"r' 11. �J.7 � // ,]_[/ r�fir ihr si./ ! ,�( "7-4. i-e: 4 v ... 5� l j �S 7 :,; `. ii./i-s.s.„is,AAI-c-lc..c)?i--,_Aa.A. g. 1.'4.7)a.1 9:1 '-'-' ,:s 0, lz,let)14 _ C 7\ \ V,-g „i ,--, r�` F `A : r•�� `�'1 l f+ �i. .13. \\,,,_,\4I p `< 1 �, r' 14. C ° r'3, 2'.t o' . I-• /0, S. •/ i'7 jd ,•',•-to- A c.1. ° -h / 15. `" ` ( '' , 7\4 / 1,ei a.cam / a . 3 ci `f an f. fit f.-(--ei t.„( i.,-d1. 16.�f/-,), :,!a-, t'," ,/ . 1.'2. -. _ •., .* / .." �_ ; �'''� — t `,,1. ., .�'` , . _1 ,_.,, 17.f ig"fA.- 4,,_,s�� 4.,�..,., / r�:bb E- / n . -Fd.9c4,. .. K. v j O.=i L.)l',l 18. g,u41144, K 11 .a t - ;2 8�vr L ,` 6 , f'- �) U u �Grr , t _ - 23 January 1967 Renton City Council: We, the undersigned owners, are in the area of 88th place (126th-128th), which is being considered for rezoning from S-1 to R-3. We wish to enter a protest against such rezoning for the following reasons: 1. This rezoning is against the comprehensive plan of the City of Renton. 2. This rezoning would be a spot zoning of an otherwise residential area. 3. 88th place is the main route of traffic to Renton and beyond for residents of the.West Hill area of Renton and the majority of residents in Bryn Mawr. a. Limited access to Rainier Ave. and Renton Ave. for additional traffic. b. Streets are to capacity with traffic now. c. Streets are not up to todays standards for added congestion. d. Present topography does not suggest reasonable off-street parking facilities for apartment occupants and visitors. e. Limited amount of parking along the streets now. f. No sidewalks for pedestrians. Name Address 1. %,i 2,:J_ -- -�� / 7J 7 v deA,P (4 t_ .6) --�2. _ -� l 3. 4Ei / ) 5.`' :, , `-l F/. Fd6- -5--- /A -'' / 'r. r1 „ 6. r �- �a6�, S =. � / 4`'�/'Pr--�J 8. % /g 90 r3 a 10. .�' .t. �� -1 S 1)- „ / s``12. /f • 7P() czA , - 13. _ ..� � .�, 11// is 5/7e--4 14.G7 15. 16. _4 January 1967 Renton City Council/Planning Commission: We, the undersigned owners, are in the area of 88th place (126th-128th), which is being considered for rezoning from S-1 to R-3. We wish to enter a protest against such rezoning for the following reasons: 1. This rezoning is against the comprehensive plan of the City of Renton. 2. This rezoning would be a spot zoning of an otherwise residential area. 3. 88th place is the main route of traffic to Renton and beyond for residents of the West Hill area of Renton and the majority of residents in Bryn Mawr. a. Limited access to Rainier Ave and Renton Ave. for additional traffic. b. Streets are to capacity with traffic now. c. Streets are not up to todays standards for added congestion. d. Present topography does not suggest reasonable off-street parking facilities for apartment occupants and visitors. e. Limited amount of parking along the streets now. f. No sidewalks for pedestrians. Name Address. 2. //�C� ,.:crc // O %:a-Zx. �%:i (pCI 4. 5. 6. 7• 8. 9• 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17.) - 18. 19. r bY 1/,e ) f 25 �e, 24 January 1967 Renton Planning Commission Renton City Hall Renton, Wash. 98055 Dear Sirs; We live in the West Hill area of Renton, on 87th Ave. South and we are constantly amazed that the city considers allowing rezoning of specific areas. It is my understanding that the comprehensive plan of Renton does not approve spot zoning in otherwise residential areas, for obvious reasons. We are speaking of the possibility of rezoning the area between 126th-128th on 88th place South, from S-1 to R-3. Once a small area is rezoned there would be no end to spot zoning. We and many of our neighbors are very opposed to this rezoning and will be in attendance at the meeting on Wednesday night. A petition is being circulated now, and will be presented to you prior to the meeting. It is everyones desire to keep a residential area strictly residential. Thank you. Respectfully CC�FI`IED rC Mr & Mrs Lester Saffell JAN 12340-87th Ave. South Renton, Washington 98055 4/f�� G DEP PCV Vs( c' ‘. A� -‘0- { 8906 South 128th Street Renton, Washington 98055 January 24, 1967 Renton Planning Commission City Hall Renton, Washington 98055 Gentlemen: . In a number of instances recently your commission has been requested to rezone a prime residential area on the West Hill of Renton to a commercial or business type of rezone. In the interests of good planning and to protect this fine residential area against the encroachment of slowly being commercialized may I urge you to draw a line of demarkation as to how far up the hill apartment house construction will be permitted. To date 90th Avenue South seems to be the established line between residence (on the west-uphill) and commercial or business (on the east-downhill) . Mrs. Rauch and I purchased property and built a fine .home at the above address. One of the prime factors in locating in this area was the fine view it afforded. The proposal you have before you tonight, if approved, would permit the possible construction of an apartment house complex along 88 Place South practically in our front yard. We do not wish to see our property down-graded by this planned apartment house construction. Presently this property has a nice home on it - why should it be destroyed for an apartment? In view of the foregoing I urge you to turn down this application for rezone from S-1 to R-3 in the area east of 88th Place South between South 126th and South 128th and west of 90th Avenue South. Sincerely, ��z K_ Henry Rauch \d„.," Li P/ [//4 r ��'If(' VI ' January 23 , 1967 Planning Commission City of Renton Renton, Washington Gentlemen: We hereby submit a protest to the request of a rezone of the property located at the intersection of 90th Ave . So . and 88th Place So . (Virgil Fox rezone request) . Our objections are based on': 1 . The size , condition and traffic load on the streets in the immediate area. 2. The fact that 90th Ave . does , at present , represent a reasonable boundry line between the low and high density zones . 3 . That a higher density zoning here would "open the door" to more zoning requests in the area. 4. Our present knowledge of the situation leads us to be- lieve that this request is based on speculation only. 5 . That properties in the adjacent area are well developed under the existing code regulations . Many of us have purchased homes in this area because of the present zoning in the belief that this zoning would be upheld. Therefore , we sincerely believe that to grant a rezone of this property would not be in the best interest of the public or the community. ` -a44 \. Grc- Weli6 CAA- A4-de,yyt%.1-4 /2/aA 11 ///CF-111- ( J: i� > 1967 UEP ,/ F✓N 1 Renton, Washington January 22, 1967 Planning Commission City of Renton Gentlemen: Reference is made to posted notice of a public hearing on Wednesday, 26 January 1967, for the purpose of considering a proposed rezoning, from S-1 to R-3, of that property on 88th. Place South between South 126th. and South 128th., more legally described as: Lots 6, 7, 8, and 9, Block 6, Latimer's Lake Park Addition, as recorded in Volume 18, page 63, records of King County, Washington. I refer to the public hearing of 28 December 1966 which was held for the purpose of considering this same property for rezoning from S-1 to R-4. At this time, a petition with more than 70 names was presented to the Commission protesting the rezoning, as a high-rise structure in this area would impair the view of existing residences in the immediate area. It was my understanding the Commission decided to deny the rezoning from S-1 to R-4, or any other category, and that this matter could not be reconsidered for a six month period. My business requires my absence from the Renton area during the coming week, so I take this opportunity to furnish the Commission with polaroid pictures showing the property in question, the relationship of my- home to this property, and pictures of other homes in the immediate area which would be affected by construction of any structure in excess of 35 feet in heigth. Generally, homes in this area would range between $25,000 and $45,000. The existing structure on the property in question is admittedly an eye- sore. I, personally, would welcome low-rise, new construction, provided heig did not exceed 35 feet. In view of the fact that rezoning to R-3 would permit construction higher than 35 feet, I take this opportunity to protest the proposed rezoning, and trust the Commission will reconsider the previously furnished petition and will recall the substantial turn-out protesting the previously requested rezoning. Very truly)yours, oe E. Wood 12741 88th. Place South Renton, Washington • January 10, 1967 Pallis Realty 4739k Rainier Avenue Seattle, Washington 98308 Attention: M. W. Heidy Re: Appeal on Application 412-369-66 Planning Commission Decision Gentlemen: The Renton City Council, at its regular meeting of January 9, 1967 has set the date of February 6, 1967 for hearing on your appeal on the Virgil. Fox rezone application and denial. The appeal would of course be in regard to the denial of the R-4 zoning only. In the event that you might decide another zoning such ,as R-3 might be acceptable for your purpose then you should submit a revised application for such to • the Planning Commission since the Council cannot effectuate rezones without Planning Commission action, and could only act upon appeal of • R-4 denial. If you should wish consideration of a rezone other than the R-4 your request should be proposed to the Planning Commission as revised. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON Helmie W. Nelson City Clerk HWN/dm cc: Gordqn Ericksen //9/67 PAWS .. REALTY Real Estate and gnsurance 47391/2 RAINIER - PARKWAY 5-6777 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98108 December 30, 1966 db,11) � Vv City of Renton Cedar River Park Renton, Washington Attention: City Clerk Re: Appeal on Appl. #R-369-66 Gentlemen: This letter is in regard to the rezoning hearing held December 28, 1966, on the property of Virgil Fox, Application #R-369-66 from S-1 to R-4. Because the ob- jections voiced by the neighboring property owners culminated in the Planning Commission turning the rezoning request down, we wish to appeal this decision. The principal protest was regarding the view. It is certainly not the intent to bring any devaluation at all to any of the surrounding property, but rather to utilize the vacant property to its fullest extent economically and, at the same time, enhance the area for the existing homes. Inasmuch as there was no real objection to the multi-residence zoning, only the height of the structure, this would be controlled by a change to R-3 zoning. In this zoning, the allowed height is only 5 feet 'higha than that allowed in S-1 and the slope toward the east side of 88th Ave. So. , as we understand, should allow for this height difference so that the view would not be destroyed. The change to R-3 zoning should be quite acceptable since much of the surrounding property is already zoned R-3 and together with the proximity of B-1 property, we feel this change could scarcely be in conflict. We would appreciate your reconsideration of this matter at your earliest con- venience. Very truly yours PALLIS REALTY S6i , JAN1967g� 0� M. W. Heidy RECE ED MdH:j mb CITY of RENTON r'�r CLERK'S OFFICE $/ December 29$' 1966 4800 S. aunatul, St. . "", Seattle, Washington ' PA 11,x p .L atio fox change of zottmo Apspl.a t of n-369- 6 Dint par.' 2 • ' I he Planning Co i o'i t ;its m:!tir.,? cg December 2 3t 0 is wed your application for ca ag +�x zone Oa the basis of its review, the ?Loaning C .tai�n• t v t dthe a P ,�a4 zo change.ge. . � z m,� �a � Planning xg Commission act 0,13, 9 ado in i .i g �' - City Council within t oafs after vA public 4aF ring. is :aa r�y �tr3a$i'" ► .. � C ' - iss o .chins o pa, co �m f �k t-1::: t12.1-11mng:0111"' • Very truly yours Planain9 RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DECEMBER 28 , 1966 Members present : Dayle Garrison, James Denzer, John Racanello , Clark Teegarden, Gerald Cordell , Dick Stredicke Members absent : John Sterling, Stan Stone Staff present : Planning Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Assistant Planning Director James L. Magstadt , Delbert Moss Others present : Lyman Houk, Engineering Department The regular meeting of the Renton Planning Commission was called to order by Chairman Dayle Garrison at 8 : 00 P .M. It was moved by Denzer and seconded by Cordell that John Sterling and Stan Stone be excused from the meeting . Motion carried with Stredicke dissenting . The Minutes of the meeting of December 14 were approved as corrected . Corrections as follows : Item 2 , Page 2 : Motion carried . Item 3 , Page 2 : Mr . Felker stated that he is willing to "limit the height" Item 4, Page 3 : It was moved and seconded that the hearing be closed . Motion carried. It was moved by Denzer and seconded by Racanello that the hearing continued from December 14 be heard later in the agenda to accommodate people in the audience. Motion carried . ..,14z.?.....0„..,,,..,,, REZONES 1 , VIRGIL R. FOX , Appl . No . R-369-66, rezone from S- 1 to R-4, property on 88th P1 . S . between S . 126th and S . 128th. Staff comment : Mr. Ericksen pointed out the area on the map , indicating the surrounding zones and present arterials in the area . He pointed out the differences in elevation between the property in question and the adjoining properties . Committee report : None, Mr. Garrison asked for comments from the audience. A petition against the rezone signed by 76 citizens was presented. Several residents of surrounding areas spoke against the proposal for reasons of view obstruction, the possible lowering of present property values , and concern over possible street improvements . The audience indicated that an R-2 or R-3 zone would also be objectionable. The applicant indicated that an R-3 zone would not be suitable, saying that the size of the property was too small for single family units and that approximately a 20-unit facility was planned . ACTION : Stredicke moved and Cordell seconded that the hearing be closed . Motion carried. It was moved by Denzer and seconded by Teegarden that the application for rezone be denied. Motion carried with Racanello dissenting . I i Planning Commission Minutes December 28 , 1966 Page 2 HEARING CONTINUED FROM DECEMBER 14 2 , FIRST INVESTMENT COMPANY, Appl . No . R-364-66 , request for rezone from G to T, Trailer Park, property located on 130th Ave . S . E . between S . E . 132nd and the extension of ' 0 ' St . (S . E . of the Greenwood Cemetery) . Mr. Garrison read a letter from Traffic Engineer Del Bennett stating that he did not feel the problem of proper access had been solved. Staff comment : Mr. Ericksen pointed ou.t the area on the map and briefly outlined the standards to be met according to the Trailer Park Ordinance. He indicated that the density of such an area if all specifications were met would be slightly higher than an R-4 zone. He pointed out the Commission should give consideration to the overall plan for future development of the adjacent area. Committee report : None. Mr . Garrison asked for comments from the audience . Mr. Don Johnson spoke on behalf of the rezone, outlining the proposed trailer park. Mr. Balch also spoke on behalf of the rezone and stated that if the rezone was granted, a 60 foot right of way would be provided which would meet City standards . Mr . Houk indicated that the property does not have adequate access at this time . ACTION : It was moved by Racanello and seconded by Cordell that the hearing be closed. Motion carried with Stredicke dissenting . It was moved by Racanello that the rezone be granted with the approval of the City Engineer. Motion died for lack of second. It was moved by Racanello and seconded by Denzer that the application for rezone be granted. Motion carried with Teegarden and Stredicke dissenting . 3 . DINO PATAS , Appl . No . R-368-66 , rezone from G to T, Trailer Park, property on S . E . 128th between 132nd Ave. S . E . and 136th Ave. S . E . Staff comment : Mr. Ericksen pointed out area on map and indicated that .a trailer park would be subject to the Trailer Park Ordinance. Committee report : None. Mr. Garrison asked for comments from the audience. Mr . Patas spoke on behalf of the rezone stating that he planned on filling the hole which existed at the site and that he hoped to get city sewers . Mr . Houk stated that sewer service would require the installation of a lift station. ACTION: It was moved by Stredicke and seconded by Denzer that the hearing be closed. Motion carried. It was moved by Denzer and seconded by December 23, 1966 PETITION TO THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION • Gentlemen: . . We, the undersigned residents on the West Hill area of the City of Renton, ,�, protest the rezoning of the as-.rze�3p property �' gab .•�- a.c�. '. 1 1-ri).-` T^�,. ,.-•0 �,S«. s . , c.,. ..i l`—, ta-^ --�a-°t "Lam.,_ 4 e +i1 ,fitabf J"" to R-4. .Z t.e41 r F D Cfg S,T4Z$.6.So Al 1 6 t4 5a,/ A 5T: LOTS 0,7 eff 81.-4- This area is a first class residential property and it is our ernest desire - "to keep it this way. Your refusal of the rezoning request will be appreciated. NAME ADDRESS a r' Jr,• D / ��y 1 ' '- F is r• f- ,, '� j . ....-.,_, .4'`f C.`.GaC,� i.d..a.,J�,._..__ � ' . :!-.. _____.. I-:.'. 7 L�'j `/'.e'...,1._.r. _I —� .._..n.�_.. .-_.1.... _ t , . ,4/.. 6 / ).1. �_�fr., FZ1�- 7'-t j �=./ = iL':.,�(71,t t_e_C)C) : fj , ) Ilk. (IL f %e, c-- (t./1,,,I dvs....... ^vim . '.f7(-)((,7:1 .:.0/ je,, /, , ,, _ , ,„.. (.2 , ,,, ,...,_, . , 1 -2_if - 8._,e) _ „r/./.2-e-___., 4;....._________1( ___. r( . . : , .. .. , ,. i,s? \,.,- (..:, -I\1,_ . , . ,________ _ . ,,,....R , 1 ,-) 77;`,1) 1 - ...11../''::"....L.L...' \`...,.....1 cl,.( 'A. , .... \c\•: ... -0. ...2'il.IA U , . ..: i ;) J . f' _F. '-. 0 f. g... � ,..' 1°'f 0 3. -fixry {z. .-- ... December 23, 1966 PETITION TO THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION Gentlemen: We, the undersigned residents on the West Hill area of the City of Renton, ' protest the rezoning of the tcciadmmiktrtflOot property s.i.trttarte,26,-€4..ale.elown.m. r.' u , , skdat,T.-vcifp-,9(44.1-0:Alv,:eau,. .isz•ku,,,th2.1aatthaea4-1....r,Sa.kt,,13.,.L.VA'11:1,,,,a,aLl, _,,Ealitaa-tollmEstararae.,4.-.,s, f r om to R-4. le,c'A r /7,r) Avii-1frP,4141(6 :- 5,::,' /31-7: r 14, 'Ls C-5.AI ..„;. / •6 r At Q,- 4_,. f' k 5 T- 1_L-)7-5 This area is a first class residential property and it is our ernest desire to keep it this way. Your refusal of the rezoning request will be appreciated. NAME ADDRESS ,--", './ / -7 i 'LX .. ' i ( __ z, ...,,,, ,f_'-‘-::<7.__. .,,,--'0,„i,/:„.4. -, ....:. .,./.,,,,. ..:.il C .‘ 1.._-(,__ _. .:. :,..:,-_ :,-. __ _.. _ .. el_I....____ 1 / 2 ,i'fe-' - - .../4 . , ,..r, .Z.s . , ' '.; 1/7:e ';'''' "? / : , — 2 c' .--, 1....- -2 • 1 ') ,_. 1:::—el_ • . A__ .- __ .--..._...-___________ ___-"-__t."-----'-/,--:- -- .2,-- i ,,,, •• , _,(__- b , ,,-, i,_ --Lz_.zs------- „_-, I— .. L 4,(/' "' \ 7 {",,:, ,...•:„,- ,‘ ,.(..,,,,,,-,_,•-:,1 - 4-_../ 0-...,,,,r;- ',1,1..,-,,.:- \ ,_._ .:..., ' ,,, 'C.) L ,....-r '-', ...,(0,%,:,,,,• 6,,,,,L., ) ....----" . i .. , i -) , , .. f, / /) t, •> 1,'-( Yr 1 ,",- Y ' h • , /--- , ..... ,_/ e2_______ , _. :----, .._,/..,... :•1': 6 I e 1' ,)i'j, `,.,) '-.• , / 7 -—7.41-1--1-.-il- ---k--,.-(---(2:11`-_ _,..,t'„(. 1.a'...„-.-__)_2.,...,...-_z__ _____.,,Z,-_,_•.__,a_L...__ I__.___ c,___.1.... („..,..r-216,- , ,,, 4,k•!.,tc -(c-7-<," ,• i • t ..."-- / 7 ,..._ _ / _ ,..:). ••,), a I 'I ki k- /1,A/ li-/ ' ''',.> f„. i„. -, . ( - •c, -- -,..e:•-i.„c4......t . _ .._.4„f.'"_(.;:-:-;. ee;.171:7,..,/,;,,,_- ,,..- gr. ._ „ ,. . • . . — — • •, . December 23, 1966 PETITION TO THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION Gentlemen: We, the undersigned residents on the West Hill area of the City of Renton, •,,,,, . protest the rezoning of the e property t-cv et,13,em w = s.k ?,'-`' m_ from ,' . 'S' -/ r C .- i-r /l`- w w :%y. �.c, s.! ct,i't j�' to R-4. ,�• r a�. � .� r/. s 1�L i�� n: -r� /-2 c This area is a first class residential property and it is our ernest desire to keep it this way. Your refusal of the rezoning request will be appreciated. NAME ADDRESS /4..-,--c..,,---c....c..-r f / (,/J']' hi ' S — , -- - 7f _._. _-- -- - +mot. a` f C _ :�,:-�-s'— Cfs�r/ c?S' _� �1 - =_i a"�4 c'v-,c_ ' -/-- e''/- e _.—_---1 9.,-_-ram,.,._. __. , . is ,Q. ZT'z -- 7 j --/ py ,., / . : k.I// i 7" :177a,_ --Z.1".- ' ._...‘.,,___,X.f/: frt.--_,I.-,. 4-_-f- - L'z'LL / -') ‘,'(,),/ (i. .(' ',,,5 6:- tr;/-17-;e:::e-.-..-T., - • ee'Y'-1 .�(:.....(:.,,_ -1 _:/ ;� -,, '-`-1-_;z _(-- L_ - �/ ('' ` L [/ `/ ....;�L.0 yC.Lt� �... �y^ 7/-drib may / ,may (J� r //� (� ` i ..._./47,u, / J ��cil .Se3ls•'Z/ �((//yy/!! /� -. f y i�a Y_.. —.).1..t1.S_._ (h✓ - _ _Zti, `, --.7,-,7*--a e---,,z--c.e__ 'i.-..;...L7...-.„.1:-e-, -_-.24---,•_-...---c__._• / Z;2- c/Z) ? - _9 6! - (- (--‘ e ..ie;•:,.e . ,..--,k-,,--"..,_ - — / Z if ---- c---- ,(Axt-- , t.z/_ _.._.4: - 4.4- i--: .,--- ( :.__.._—�. _ _ �f('d-..�:.'...1..__ _,:_i ._..,�t .r,':_ .) ay:&-.G�xi-...iy-z'_C:.c.�-�•- • December 23, 1966 • PETITION TO THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION - Gentlemen: We, the undersigned residents on the West Hill area of the City of Renton„1 protest the rezoning of the o6.-8vr'sr f4 property ' ./ %' —'. S, to R.4. %(: f/ 7crri ri /::�. %;':., i a n'ra C i . S' T This area is a first class residential property and it is our ernest desire • • . , to keep it this way. Your refusal of the rezoning request will be appreciated. NAME ADDRESS _ - i' 7 / / /� 1• ,.� ,�' �'`�'.� 1, it. ^ ,r 1 ,51-- / 'i., -.'lam j-11:3?-=�' ` --=:t_z,..•t��z C�, , �- -,,,f� ,f'!' d`. ! �i .^441ifs '�...r S.�' ,�_..t �.-, . ' _ ,.___,'.�. -�:.-_--_. ,._-__-__.__--....._._.•.._—. ___.'=..�::...._ ...._...... fir, r`.. ..:.4 f ; t _J2_'r_l.- - ( -— -- .--(4 C� _ =-''ma i ,C c:' l.._ yam{ e — '' L, f — — -' - _ r)' 1,. A L ; - _ I},-� --�f`1 i ., i /! 4 / � ...fir •r Jr.. - _� . .1,i r i.-: _ _• �T ',8` !»!'-J .,'(--::"1�,..G/•s�..� L•` '(�// /(/ l/ - 1 . .`7.7r1.s-' /;: C� ! L . I(`--4'A`L0`1l- / .�., /7•�_J r tr_ r.�.,_..., ji i �'`r. L7u�_ 4�^ (/ 7t' /`' �: f_(-1",1� 'el_1 December 23, 1966 PETITION TO THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION Gentlemen; We, the undersigned residents on the West Hill area of the City of Renton, :i- protest the rezoning of the ,iit.14d.13onne.,11-1.property i•=that'e .-e°` n-4-pi' °`F�; �'e ` f rom , -4. 5 Y ` ` '`' /` ' to R ,.�•{,-'t''}` /' .;!:' 'Jf�,.!%,h ,7,� I !� .>. �'wr 7f!� r, /. nJ t' /•7(, t .( !- / ..-T This area is a first class residential property and it is our ernest desire to keep it this way. Your refusal of the rezoning request will be appreciated. NAME ADDRESS -f r,c , • .. L ti ,,e /.ter ,j k: ,_,.L.�. '�/� --------. ______._—__._,.. e ------__.-.- . , „, -fir `-''/L �- ri l • • re. - - t l / :'{ ,� / ,. ' ,ram 3 f-r' 1 -) C J r 5 ! / J ? Cf.r4 7 ' 1-61-'4 ' �,. r -, i J _, Cy .+ 5 �/ 'y ��1.�' r' �' F/rL✓-cam' r r ` l z � r ...r`_ �_ ryff / f / - -`., f, /") �, 1 ` -• f.%T:` �L% _4-7,,4,-:5''?z ._. o'�_' 'J t'.,-414_:_L____--_________.._ ,..-...ci.,z__.____.._` t__ t`_'__." -'�-_ ..._-_-__--__._ '-�,' / ' I v J ) ;) 41 J` <' 7`f y/.,i/,;.5: .'"!/, µ j. ram)'��-l.: /l) tom, ,s 1r December 23, 1966 PETITION TO THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION Gentlemen: We, the undersigned residents on the West Hill area of the City of Renton, protest the rezoning of thee property <sik. ated•»oc-4 ihe•.d' swr► l='l 'kse= -i': �s,,��„c��f���.1�,1��1.i�nu,.e,.��.�-�ka,::�.�,t .n.,.Sau.th...<12�x1�,s.and-�_Soutla u1-.2$,t-is:•.YS.t:�.eat� c ,:•{��, -=' �� to R`4. �C`C_':�r e /? ?� �' a S• . 5: L‘ <.. (> a / ? ; y / c -� �l This area is a first class residential property and it is our ernest desire to keep it this way. Your refusal of the rezoning request will be appreciated. NAME ADDRESS APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONE IN THE CITY OF RENTON FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Application No. : e 3 („7- 6 (O Sec.-Twp.-R. Date of Filing : i2_g-A6 Area Map Planning Com. Action: / _a W'-(, G arn�4e. '6 Kroll Page Date: Ord. No. : 4--2- Receipt No. 4/0 g7 67.i APPLICANT TO ANSWER ALL THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS NEATLY AND ACCURATELY Name of Applicant Virgil R. Fox Address 4800 So. Juneau St. Scattla, Mash. Telephone No. PA2-1412 Property Petitioned for rezoning is situated on 88th P1. So. Street, between So. 126th Street and So. 128th Street. Legal Description of Subject Property Lots 6, 7, 8 and 9, Block 6, Latimer's Lake Park Add. Vol. 18, Page 63 • • • • Existing Zoning • S-i Zoning Requested R-4 What are the uses you propose to develop on this property? Construct apartment building Number of permanent off-street parking spaces that will be provided on this property? leach unit Number Required _. 1 each unit NOTE TO APPLICANT: The following factors are con- sidered in reclassifying property. Evidence or additional information you desire to submit to sub= stantiate your request may be attached to these sheets. l In what way is this proposed change in zoning in the public interest? Mich surrnnndint property not conducive to Family residences due to fact property is adjacent to compv rc.ic 1 011r1 annorl prnpartc 2. On what basis is there a real need in this community for more zoning of the type you request? property vitall needed,tq help reduce shortage of housing four yapp oycco o. e - as : 4,nu rstr a p t.aits oeaLtd iu Kenton an conveniently situated to help alleviate traf icc conepstion 3, Do you consider the property involved in this application to be more suitable •for the uses permitted in the proposed zone than for the uses per- mitted in the present classification? Please explain. y,s_ It is t large a piece of ro-D rot t tilize with onl 2'P. b`�"°p � e c, rk would you make to protectadjacent 'and surroun ing prop- erty from the detrimental effects of any uses permitted in the proposed zone? With coding and height restrictions, Reid multiple due1 'iil3 cannot deproc!ato c::!cting residential property. — AFFIDAVIT L I, / `y, being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of pro ert °nvolved in this application and that the foregoing state- ments and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn to me this rill day of ,4-6 /+,vff6/L 1964 Notary Public• rr"an'd,,for the State C$u. «.•o° lrTT 1. f of Wasliingto, -ggsid °rrq: at �. '\4�� ' �A ,_ Virgil R. Fox (NanieY""y ' (Name of Owner) Y 7d% ! L gsie-r...,�, �;�,e.-4 din4800 So. Juneau St. (Address) (Mailing Address) Seattle, Washington (City) (State) PA2-1412 (Telephone) (OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Planning Department governing the filing of such application. (7Date recei d G[t\JCu WN'� ,196 BY: o D C 8 r.' ) k G DEj NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION AT ITS REG- ULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON lecember 28 , 19- 66 , AT 8 :00 P.M. TO CONSIDER A PETITION FOR From S--1 to R7A FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: Located on 88th P1. S. between S 126th and S. 128t Streets. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 6, 7, 8 and 9, Block 6, Latimer' s Lake Park Add. + as recorded in Vol. 18, Page 63 , Records of King Co, Washington. ANY AND ALL PERSONS INTERESTED OR OBJECTING TO SAID Rezone ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PLANNNING COMMISSION MEETING ON Dec. 28 19 66 AT 8 :00 P.M. TO VOICE THEIR PROTEST OR OBJECTION TO SAME. JAMES DENIER ,SECRETARY PUBLISHED December 14 , 1966 RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATION JAMES MAGSTADT , Hereby certify that. three (3) copies of the above document were posted by me in three conspicuous places on the property described above a.s prescribed by .law. ° J l E, ATTfST-; t•,1PCi „ SIGN 1 III1III ► ► ► l 1 I I n ln4 _=sT Ei / 5 —_J maim a _ I zO ' Pv • 1115 0 ..... •, PL. MN / I z 3 4 5..•.•6 7 .. / a,w- III l Is. ,Z ASH 5T • 9 ,4 ° 5 6 4 1111011s1 ®6 1 4 •1� 8 C) ..44..17.12, P, 4.: T Zo IS 14• 7m_0r 11 11 4: W . 5 wi® 4n 1 . 3 0 :'(Z ©E ass` ms - ?v ri, 10 © C� �P10 1001 In= WM ogsainci �- asT 11 MIND �(. r* ?IZ1I �� .Ts irr_ _MEM 7,41-'s,„.. -i. 0 2. n rums....WA ciL 33 >®� 4 > Zi R S S 0 Q� S Q¢EW. I ZBTH ST. ' el , kf:1.-- ( , •-4, .e.H.. 2.4...i... 241)5 40 tit 39 �( r 43 3:. 4 j _ a 4 ,� 27 I 4 I ■ 9 to TH ST. VAC), '1 29 8 264 • • �K� 1 12 � —� 7 10 '25 x : 46 347110 F 48 Qv 44 45 •T" i sf 55 , ,r 1 6 7 Q,.e • 1 14' 23 ,(vAe 130 TH ST C� VACVI • 3 22 _ .5Ca 55 54 53 21 ^7 '' \ 2 Q •8 7 6 503 8 7 6 5 m C • \ , ® zo �. --- -- 2 \ S 1 31 sT ST. VAG ] \ c.c•NL 58 59 6 0. 61 62 A ( 1 23a56789)a I, \ `, 0+.(. w TILLICLM \ •_-Fr 1 (VAC) asa 1 • \\.\��\ O \\ _ Y`PJ �s 1 z 3 TO i \� \ \ �-� '4 fz 1 8T65432i 4 W . ��o ,\ R' kN - 2 I • \ �\ ( �• \\ e y 9 loll 1LgxK1, i • VEC `RlA AYE- . . i \ \ ' -..VAC--•'- --------- . \ \ AIM ' \ ' \ \ . , `. I . , • Q • \ c,• i33nv I ; {. 1 57' \ \ h 1 1 ier c siE ..z. \ 2 S s ' \ li',.iC1- tt....i €,...n •I I ^ = tl I.rJ, �S FAO i _ _ _--S l ci �.'^_ '�-. -r+c T S (7./.--.\ .4 ,..,,a',',1 a c., t [ r y� i,Ors ' st _, '4-7- ',,,o.- \ 4mr: *1 _1 ` \ 6c t.{� ib •v 0 7 u. Sri t c u* , } ' i-> I ] . -./ />N ".,, \ \ \ \ 1 L 92' �J"' .}tea''• . T`",l ``f' -_ I- 1 1S �tl s- #' '.r - rsa 1 r �._.; �+..521' • j ri/ ,,.. `` II it �. 11 I I 0, T t r4' '` r f.[ r , - n_ • /� �. nx n�in ar 1:\,4:I ('' ,i 1 �`. _•' `CL•' 1 L. �t .-_ by 1.1041N10 1S.- v `.i 10,s R r ' t c,y 95 ti r '� 4'' aS Z. S y _ .• _ 1 b h 9t , +1tr • I I • J ` .�F- • 9pTT t p .b,y. ... .v»-.......,q y .r. r { ... .sr . . .._• .. .. .gyp. .. - tr. .� !} 4. \ , \ I ,.;., ,.. .,,I, -,:e, -,._. t, ,, 1 _,___,, I I 1.:.......dm...; f t � } 7 C� ----.,_,-.. 1 -:,i), �/t \ II \----__ is ...,-.,,3n�l_na ' 'I LI- t — —J _-i,. il..._ _, 1u1 �\t\ L__) I 1 r at D_..._. Tt D`J ��//1� ` it \\', `''� _: iI�,I�.l. lil1 l��m�.._ Z_. m .�_. t t —�'1''` H t_. 1J1 8 1 � t� �_, _- _ �q ��V� I T ----- IIIIUU�I��IIIII j� cc = 1 u,li 1 —a i INIIIIINI as c , vrw8 �t ` 1 . . ", 1 RIEI:IIIIIII u.1' �� �......�'ll a, IIniIIII1IIIN • — •' ‘ is 5` 1 .. c r P 11,--=� -- \�. �t\ u 7-7 j.. 6 _1 1 ' r,1 ,.,__ F'�"INIIIIIIIIII 3�c `l-� F , , : . I .'i_ :t11 III IS .,.ai s I:.. I 1L i. ;,:.n c ji' a 8'' 0. ,,-s. � ,c h` . it i INII a --- -- ZI� - 1 — 1 � Riau: .—,r I -c'. 1111111%. ;7.#1, A61t4Pp s _s o, \ !'"y OrSCiy 4y yipohlt �., • 4 /, 41% i � y\ lb-Ali Y N / gyp. . \d. „://h..