Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA00-150 migiumprippimpor--,....m.rmippomm......." -_ :: .1gwriimilip „ p CITY OF RENTON ,, RA Planning/Building/Public Works 10 0,4 1055 South GradyWayRenton Washington 98055 ' NOV t TO 0. M - Q Q - g :`�, � m cc 1 a BMETER .• ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED 'a° M► _ - 7158401 U.S. Post .n , N Emil& osemary A Nason 7219 S 1 Tli St - Seattle WA 8178 _- CN UPdWLE 1 0 FORWARD SD `` ;' w�� Wd 13,14) r \\\ - — -- - — � T N �a SENDER '7 ���p ✓� R 9gin., � vw2 IIEiiiiii11Il,1�,Iiii,h:I1,,II,I 1.1.1,,1,t,I►fhIIIIII�ii,,IlIlpIsI„1 imi I. ;� ,1^ - - (Vy . • y.t•-•% • • • NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: November 17,2000 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-00-150,PP,ECF APPLICATION NAME: AMBERWOOD PRELIMINARY PLAT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant has proposed subdividing a 199,505 sq. ft. (4.58 A) property, by means of the Preliminary Plat process, into 19 lots suitable for detached, single-family residences. An existing house and out-buildings would be removed.Access would be from NE 4th Street to the north, via Rosario Avenue NE, and an extension of NE 3ro Court to the west. Environmental review is required and a public hearing before the city of Renton Hearing Examiner. PROJECT LOCATION: 6001 NE 4th Street OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS,M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into • a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: November 13,2000 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: November 17,2000 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Preliminary Plat Approval Other Permits which may be required: Construction permits,grading license,building permits ' Requested Studies: Geotechnical Engineering Report,Traffic Impact Study,Storm Drainage Report,wetland reconnaissance Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, Sixth Floor,Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing scheduled for January 16,2001,before the Renton Hearing Examiner in Renton Council Chambers. Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on the 7th . floor of the Renton City Hall located at 1055 Grady Way South. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: • Land Use: single family residential Zoning: Residential 5(five dwelling units per net acre) _ Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Geotechnical Engineering Report,Traffic Impact Study,Storm Drainage Report, wetland reconnaissance • Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: . • Renton Municipal Code,State Environmental Policy Act,1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual requirements NOTICE OF APPLICATION Proposed Mitigation Measures: • 1. The applicant shall install a silt fence along the downslope perimeter of the area that is to be disturbed. The silt fence shall be in place_before clearing and grading is initiated, and shall be constructed in conformance with the specifications presented in Section D.4.3.1 of the King County Surface Water Design Manual. This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements was well as building construction. • 2. •Shallow drainage swales shall be constructed to intercept surface water flow and route the flow away from the construction area to a stabilized discharge point. Vegetation growth shall be established in the ditch by seeding or placing sod. Depending on site grades, it may be necessary to line the ditch with rock to protect the ditch from erosion and to reduce flow rates. The design and construction of drainage swales shall conform to the specifications presented in Section 4.4.1 of the 1990 SWDM. Temporary pipe systems can also be used to convey stormwater across the site. This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. 3. The project contractor shall perform daily review and maintenance of all erosion and sedimentation control measures at the site during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. 4. Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation shall be submitted by the project Engineer of record to the public works inspector for the construction of the civil improvements of the plat. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities shall be required prior to recording of the plat. 5. The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee at the rate of $75.00 per each new average weekday trip attributable to the project, estimated to be 9.55 average weekday trips per new residence. The Transportation Mitigation Fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. 6. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$488.00 per each new single family residential lot created by the proposed plat. The fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. 7. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee at the rate of $530.76 per each new single family residential lot. The fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Ms.Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner,Development - Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on December 1,2000. This matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on January 16,2001,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Seventh Floor,Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division,(425)430-7282,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,please contact the project manager. Anyone who submits written comments will • automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: ELIZABETH HIGGINS—(425)430-7382 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION il I $g1f® S ,n tN •.• . u R �I. n �TL i^'X °3cof�C;�IK ,, . II n •• Q • I., • ; I. is II 1 II11 $ • I.a 0 y„t� C cal� �� ' ' 0 , a N A . 14 rt _II 0 I m, 1 ®..®, ° m N� 4131 er* O , 'I t ; n . �. till II'c:: - m th InnV n wM1 —in— .p nW MM M *eau ,r " d Mho.6 a Mht Wd,.t..nw3 Ill 411 ha. "Iortd, on t>ok' — ' In tAe. of U. tta p / 9 ': a E era Ac ! ILI x • W • 3 +v,,. ® Z 3 O' uNlc III ti In DI .fE•-•-w! •ui i Z t t k ; CM til F. � .____2(-1' n`' w ... O iIiV ..04.. a,[. •3h • . °b . ' n w 3I. � ' /4R ; CRtVT1 ge'•fTESrn �,a I® w = • NOTICE OF APPLICATION 0 (5 CITY OF RENTON "1, ,,,wtOpe•Lii..",nr".„...4,,,,..,.. .. ..„. ,_, , .r- ,j %NIL Planning/Building/Public Worithl . •i t4 ,-, „,c '-_-,C d freincl f ,.., . ,, s 1 TO 0 Oeat“,ti :: 0 3 0 5 : 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055(-‘,„:„...;;,;;;-:<:,;7..., tg,t- eXu-Sin - )001 Pa METER ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED t•z,,,.i.,,,<-;....,:,, •c:,:vy,,77.4.7, 715840i U.S. POSTAGE 9 , . ...r ,,,,,,,r, THIS IS A BUSNESS V., -,., .,:_.tO KING COUNTY ML MUST i7,102,..v1E A . . 500 4Th Ave SUITE NU-MEER Iti'D/On .._. 9 1 , Seattle, WX98104 • i •, 142305 9071 --CEPet.iatLiNiERY INSUFfiCIENT .:-.;.. - 00E2e --i. ... . ADDRESS'c - AON ..IZ . .: ., ::, — - : r ,--7. I ETURN TO SENDER — ' UtIP Ai ._ ,,, _ ._ 11A• ... r...,.»z•m ni1131iiiiiiiMildffiliiiiM11113id (VY 1 O C0 . vti + + • NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: November 17,2000 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-00-150,PP,ECF APPLICATION NAME: AMBERWOOD PRELIMINARY PLAT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant has proposed subdividing a 199,505 sq. ft. (4.58 A) property, by means of the Preliminary Plat process, into 19 lots suitable for detached, single-family residences. An existing house and out-buildings would be removed.Access would be from NE 41h Street to the north, via Rosario Avenue NE,_and an extension of NE 3rd Court to'the west. Environmental review is required and a public hearing before the city of Renton Hearing Examiner. PROJECT LOCATION: 6001 NE 4th Street OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS,M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into • a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: November 13,2000 . NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: November 17,2000 Permits/Review Requested: -''3 Environmental(SEPA)Review;'Preliminary"Plat Approval `;: ` ': 'r:14;\ Other Permits which may be required: Construction permits,grading license,building permits Requested Studies: Geotechnical Engineering Report,Traffic Impact Study;Storm Drainage Report,wetland reconnaissance Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, Sixth Floor,Renton City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing scheduled for January 16,2001,before the Renton Hearing Examiner in Renton Council Chambers. Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on the 7th floor of the Renton City Hall located at 1055 Grady Way South. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use: single family residential Zoning: Residential 5(five dwelling units per net acre) . . Environmental Documents that - Evaluate the Proposed Project: Geotechnical Engineering Report,Traffic Impact Study,Storm Drainage Report, wetland reconnaissance • Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: Renton Municipal Code,•State=Environmental Policy Act;1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual requirements :.. KING COUNTY 500 4Th Ave Seattle, WA 98104 142305 9072 NOTICE OF APPLICATION • 7 Proposed Mitigation Measures: 1. The applicant shall install a silt fence along the downslope perimeter of the area that is to be disturbed. The silt fence shall be in place before clearing and grading is initiated, and shall be constructed in conformance with the specifications presented in Section D.4.3.1 of the King County Surface Water Design Manual. This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements was well as building construction. . 2. •Shallow drainage swales shall be constructed to intercept surface water flow and route the flow away from the construction area to a stabilized discharge point. Vegetation growth shall be established in the ditch by seeding or placing sod. Depending on site grades, it may be necessary to line the ditch with rock to protect the ditch from erosion and to reduce flow rates. The design and construction of drainage swales shall conform to the specifications presented in Section 4.4.1 of the 1990 SWDM. Temporary pipe systems can also be used to convey stormwater across the site. This will be required during the construction of both•off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. 3. The project contractor shall perform daily review and maintenance of all erosion and sedimentation control measures at the site during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. 4. Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation shall be submitted by the project Engineer of record to the public works inspector for the construction of the civil improvements of the plat. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities shall be required prior to recording of the plat. 5. The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee at the rate of$75.00 per each new average weekday trip attributable to the project, estimated to be 9.55 average weekday trips per new residence. The Transportation Mitigation Fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. 6. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$488.00 per each new single family residential lot created by the proposed plat. The fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. 7. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee at the rate of'$530.76 per each new single family residential lot. The fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Ms.Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner,Development • Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on December 1,2000. This matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on January 16,2001,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Seventh Floor,Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division,(425)430-7282,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal - before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,please contact the project manager. Anyone who submits written comments will • automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: ELIZABETH HIGGINS—(425)430-7382 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION43 `fi I8' lir •i . 0 . .I. ,, j I © ® _ 0 ' �-- I-- ......aYa......mar U a • i I_ • InirhL.7.. 1-. .5 ,1 "1 is T1 {-- • L �j `�: !, w 1� • i N }e i 0. ® ®..®, Nam �-'r� �1' O� I i. ; f. • i®r i;dp ti .-. -..�..w,�=--„, — — —._.'._._._=�. _._. .. 9.E:�• rl2—aTT1• •ST.• — 'tL-" - -L�•- if a...,Eh • 11 MYf�{— IN IIW NM we ewe g r /�� r 7 . ism. yI�+' i 0 1 'wig•YA}1 S..nw i c 111 3 -Nr ' n It) Mk. L{]/.- MA 2 i 5 /1/.2j 1 2 mom.(15 . T . 3 4 i W R a . Z • ,„ ® 0r (TM. © '' row , .. . ,1. „4 CI 7 F Q 1a'TuY :. • w, 4 tPtiA'Rr C � T ES� A'TES' p' ,a+c 1 I • 1 r • r NOTICE OF APPLICATION B , L tv /- - usts f m. a a m s 7 1<.• gym . A_ 11/f�1 _�'/ Q . 17r% yuy CIO G ____ _a i" 1 cr-- 1.•m... MN"WE { t�l to Z f A r� « r (i . .rnw S j1! 4 L s E >'11 SL'I R-� k ©1 - Q9R01 ® _=�I6_, pa/ tr - PVT 71l Q•7 'WW1 N h MV ITV m 111 P 7 wfuwls flpflq 14f11 II® Q s { C m^ MIN fM % MI, 931 MI _114 / Anni T IV AtA ? °1& HL ZI 3•S .,wfs.-i:.,,u•a i r"1sat.- a=ft.�-. -'"—.rt. II t l ZIEZ ,__{ a 7 ;i a limp . R $� s fi foul L7ufi/ Lr. 1 s 0 0.1 ' e • f1 i �Et ^ iF ' n .1. , II • a O . .-II II 1 _1 &- -BF i a 0 CITY OF RENTON _ ice" ' ,. i � �. GA Planning/Building/Public Works.: � € : 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055fil �4y 17'9 � - 0,3 0 5 ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED 7I840I U.S. POSTAGE .‘k:)\ Andrea C Shane i'' : 12635 155Th �SE Renton, Wr flb .`Q;S9=` '(-)(3 .,935330 0820 , E r 'J fa N .s. 1 0 R}TE +`,:, A0NJG2 ` tra IS!!`,ADDRESSEE ; 6 d {[ of 1 !1 ! tT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 'y .' - id �!' a:/' 5� pi 0v 'lr..i=5+ul rit«' Ilii:Fi fIil fla it itiifltiF Fillli 11f1111'I1II11IFilifff,thiiiIl1•Illllltlii'llf! r � Y • • TO • • NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: November 17,2000 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-00-150,PP,ECF APPLICATION NAME: AMBERWOOD PRELIMINARY PLAT • PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant has proposed subdividing a 199,505 sq. ft. (4.58 A) property, by means of the Preliminary Plat process, into 19 lots suitable for detached, single-family residences. An existing house and out-buildings would be removed..Access would be from NE 4th Street to the north, via Rosario Avenue NE, and an extension of NE 3rd Court to the west. Environmental review is required and a public hearing before the city of Renton • Hearing Examiner. PROJECT LOCATION: 6001 NE 4th Street OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS,M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into • a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: November 13,2000 • NOTICE OPCOMPLETE'APPLICATION: '''-'November17y 2000 ' = -'i'•' ' ": Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Preliminary Plat Approval Other Petmits'which may be required: Construction permits,grading license,•building permits. • • • Requested Studies: Geotechnical Engineering Report,Traffic Impact Study,Storm Drainage Report,wetland reconnaissance Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, Sixth Floor,Renton City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 • PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing scheduled for January 16,2001,before the Renton Hearing Examiner in Renton Council Chambers. Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on the 7th . • floor of the Renton City Hall located at 1055 Grady Way South. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use: single family residential Zoning: Residential 5(five dwelling units per net acre) Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: - Geotechnical Engineering Report,Traffic Impact Study,Storm Drainage Report, wetland reconnaissance Development Regulations Used`ForProject Mitiiigatio'n .•. .Renton'Municipal Code;State Environmental Policy Act,1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual requirements i,-;: NOTICE OF APPLICATION Proposed Mitigation Measures: - 1. The applicant shall install a silt fence along the downslope perimeter of the area that is to be disturbed. The silt fence shall be in place_before clearing and grading is initiated, and shall be constructed in conformance with the specifications presented in Section,D.4.3.1 of the King County Surface Water Design Manual. This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements was well as building construction. • 2. •Shallow drainage swales shall be constructed to intercept surface water flow and route the flow away from the construction area to a stabilized discharge point. Vegetation growth shall be established in the ditch by seeding or placing sod. Depending on site grades, it may be necessary to line the ditch with rock to protect the ditch from erosion and to reduce flow rates. The design and construction of drainage swales shall conform to the specifications presented in Section 4.4.1 of the 1990 SWDM. Temporary pipe systems can also be used to convey stormwater across the site. This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. 3. The project contractor shall perform daily review and maintenance of all erosion and sedimentation control measures at the site during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. 4. Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation shall be submitted by the project Engineer of record to the public works inspector for the construction of the civil improvements of the plat. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities shall be required prior to recording of the plat. 5. The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee at the rate of$75.00 per each new average weekday trip attributable to the project, estimated to be 9.55 average weekday trips per new residence. The Transportation Mitigation Fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. 6. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$488.00 per each new single family residential lot created by the proposed plat. The fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. 7. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee at the rate of $530.76 per each new single family residential lot. The fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Ms.Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner,Development • Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on December 1,2000. This matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on January 16,2001,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Seventh Floor,Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division,(425)430-7282,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal • before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,please contact the project manager. Anyone who submits written comments will • • automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: ELIZABETH HIGGINS-(425)430-7382 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION -8i" • xB• 4 I fly,I ® .° ' � �I . .Alt..© .�� _ •I p 1u •�.. • 3. P. ' Mal Qi I t P ui_Qlt L DE c X- L n a 3131E - WY 0t y M• A W ./; Mho awls 5..•a..4 3 Af ' •N //' I=1 t.laao Oak r 0 E 4.ro,4.0 •i% ✓I� -S�L� a m..A • 3• 4.199 z a• ® 4 O' woo (� acrk © ill i Q) C -•-!O a.i • F a . i ; Ill 0 iV4uQ ---. II ' =1, a 11.r , .I • f 1.1 P\.' 4S0AIR CRE T 1 E S�'A'TES�a..n.. ' NOTICE OF APPLICATION ".1771,..!rt4t• i ss. -_.._s•-•,6,.., ..,..._ ._____ • ---„,,,IIIIIIIIIIIII $ 40 CITY OF RENTON . P Sri _ ea Planning/Building/Public Works .4 ; '' to 1 — 'U piny,:3 .r. 0 isg; NOV 1 1'0 0 it'.! ..40 e4 - 0 3 0 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 ,ed ,.r.,Trtt. PB PitTER . ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED 7158401 U.S. POST ., :- - ------,-, ,: .. . • ' . :- - • .:' --:::.'- —7' S'ill—'FIRM.. .t.LAS&'SEA-AVM illiEi 1 Till . , . , . . . J W MORRISON INC PO Box 407 • Kenmore, WA 98028 -- ___, ___ -- _________ - --- _--- __---- — , •112305 9004 MORR4O7* 980282029 1799 16 11/22/00 FORWARD TIME EXP RTN TO SEND .. : J W MORRISON I PO- BOX 599 - .-J BELLEVUE WA 98009-0599 1 - :-. • 1• RETURN TO SENDER 1 iitt:sli.4011.t'slif4..-M•••iiiii ! • • •,,'"Sear-YZat I SW-3S- - - -------- -- - --- -- ---— ---—- - GiVY O� • �'NT� • • • NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: November 17,2000 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-00-150,PP,ECF APPLICATION NAME: AMBERWOOD PRELIMINARY PLAT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant has proposed subdividing a 199,505 sq. ft. (4.58 A) property, by means of the Preliminary Plat process,.into 19 lots suitable for detached, single-family residences. An existing house and out-buildings would be removed.Access would be from NE 4th Street to the north, via Rosario Avenue NE, and an extension of NE 3rd Court to the west. Environmental review is required and a public hearing before the city of Renton Hearing Examiner. PROJECT LOCATION: 6001 NE 4th Street OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS,M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into • a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: November 13,2000 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: November 17,2000 Permits/Review Requested: . Environmental(SEPA)Review,Preliminary Plat Approval Other Permits which may be required: Construction permits,grading license,building permits Requested Studies: Geotechnical Engineering Report,Traffic Impact Study,Storm Drainage Report,wetland reconnaissance Location where application may bb reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, Sixth Floor,Renton City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing scheduled for January 16,2001,before the Renton Hearing Examiner in Renton Council Chambers. Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on the 7th floor of the Renton City Hall located at 1055 Grady Way South. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use: single family residential Zoning: Residential 5(five dwelling units per net acre) Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Geotechnical Engineering Report,Traffic Impact Study,Storm Drainage Report, wetland reconnaissance • Development Regulations . • Used For Project Mitigation: Renton Municipal Code,State Environmental Policy Act,1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual requirements • • NOTICE OF APPLICATION s ---. Proposed Mitigation Measures: . 1. The applicant shall install a silt fence along the downslope perimeter of the area that is to be disturbed. The silt fence shall be in place before clearing and grading is Initiated, and shall be constructed in conformance with the specifications presented in Section D.4.3.1 of the King County Surface Water Design Manual. This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements was well as building construction. 2. •Shallow drainage swales shall be constructed to intercept surface water flow and route the flow away from the construction area to a stabilized discharge point. Vegetation growth shall be established in the ditch by seeding or placing sod. Depending on site grades, it may be necessary to line the ditch with rock to protect the ditch from erosion and to reduce flow rates. The design and construction of drainage swales shall conform to the specifications presented in Section 4.4.1 of the 1990 SWDM. Temporary pipe systems can also be used to convey stormwater across the site. This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. 3. The project contractor shall perform daily review and maintenance of all erosion and sedimentation control measures at the site during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. 4. Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation shall be submitted by the project Engineer of record to the public works inspector for the construction of the civil improvements of the plat. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities shall be required prior to recording of the plat. 5. The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee at the rate of$75.00 per each new average weekday trip attributable to the project, estimated to be 9.55 average weekday trips per new residence. The Transportation Mitigation Fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. 6. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$488.00 per each new single family residential lot created by the proposed plat. The fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. 7. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee at the rate of $530.76 per each new single family residential lot. The fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. . Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Ms.Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner,Development • Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on December 1,2000. This matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on January 16,2001,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Seventh Floor,Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division,(425)430-7282,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,please contact the project manager. Anyone who submits written comments will • • automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: ELIZABETH HIGGINS—(425)430-7382 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION ae, 1r.•i . a ye • ' b..... © $ ° ..a f -- 1-- IF u • u • u . I. a 3 T It .» . . » • • f a . pg-gt X- R .. �M in . a . .111717 c Eg t] f ►1 �t. 1 ...{ll�y� ya-_1•y�/_ -^'-- :.�_/.._._.��,._._. �. . :�.—.—.—.Y-.,„„.yam ,.,,_,.w-,j,._„I. __.,,� 04, S.E:>31I• ..."I2eTTl1�•ST: k'tj.� . i i g a A ma.1 I • s I 1.041 s...... s� �r1 Ways In '.I �f7 .s1 M. I / �.�, = o r 3 •&Nora•• t704] 1 I 121 Liam.. L&N k WI . 470 h.0 //8/4 1 i ma.-...-4— • Cl • 3 1 2 1 (Tao 0 r z • i 1 1 .... ,n o O- .Nk o a _ $ In 7 cal —Kr'N1' r H2. LA A k 244 ill P O t 14ti� ��i ' IR.a ui1 • . I A3R CRi TiE S 4TE I ... e.` , ` NOTICE OF APPLICATION © •.,,°°, ,,.» Elf 0. r' g,r NII l� s oA m.n�n AHAc g.2, R»4®- - y ., ' A a- < n . x e ,� L Si ] AmaIB R la,sen a-,! '•e° z�! e ° 4E .,E 8 S 0 Inw < SI;II R 4 5'F ir»'mfl j .a<w 6:221e,e,°, z„ Oven: 13. ° C7: oa R r i R<H • :__ ncs .,., ® r ... , s R¢Hooper An -4.. --p • R - o"e,.a®. es Myrtle Barnett ,a,” u,A< ©,' H . „ ,xI x d"ma,u wn«a >ex.c ©3 %Ire..save Loan Assn i IAA m .°. R® w n w W _ a ESSORS-f T-». P Charles x.eaa ,e:A.. "E mil EMI . " E� •>i 4#sl ^ C�I�.I • br . zo< .a A° 6 °., ��' ,n..° �1 =i - I.: NEIGHED HOOD BM�I NEI y I— „3,2A,. ,I I� M DETAIL All P O°& JI°.., 0 ..._i,.t... - ® ®•' «..«....................... ®II�I a crmE 1•-200 _— : I "�s ee..<12416214e,Jr.•,CAB C542 Holman .s.A.5 a �i SOW, N 6H-w , ,... .°n 9° : e ., n 14-� is"'re,; o y R n mx« _ q w° ` 6 w -A a» f�O • E fI w • ell `s _ wt Ifs » 4'. -El ' lig �lg•......_ .... ,�, .�- . .. ..SE. PB H _,. - ... ,r- - ,: - S E.'E�.;-.,'-IYBTM 5T ' ivI 9 is 1.I&,. wet v^4�{.,n g '6—*i'T"v; n`'•-iT _^9 ,1, p : ,J� ,harm-� .w "r 3}; F a» 12. u r u A umsR u.:a ... z , ,... H� 4. 3 t & s ® ,,, "1 a ®_®I.I p® A..°.® i ., _. / ^ �/ : —3 8 „� ". .», •— — '' ,Irk. aw ® �mol l E i Y s® 's E & ••,, - E �°•' _ ®1 1 1<•Eco,-.wFI.� — !� l/fir o "o ..® ®.,,. fl i ,c uaaancr a,.Ac le'z 6 6 fl Iss�A:. A I�e.J T g� II s §` ,I 'fI `_ t1 ••. v ®• ° ..., 'GEbARtiRdv PAk 0,I.IVY a .�. .p O as .-�. °9E. 132ND LT. "t e4` 'I NA •3 •E6'••^ a :BLA K „s€<e A� �1AC Ely P.T13 CRIESTrc ES kTEISs®u®:z : -'s'EI llil _ LOAM [fIV E ACRID TR4 se z ¢ 6 2-8 CI' `0°x1,0- i !I, ;W iL ,WR1RiOO1K�'�' E 133RD ST ^I- a xi_21i n., u..,.,..1 ". .. _ _ SE • 13wRo ST N•4 i Q v a.'" ,.o'Tit f 3"1 2' ignat Vll�w ee l : -S•1 3 �,c .n.,.aa. I•.... ▪ <�� �z- S -.' m.», ° uqe Wong ..n Aa Ac 1322, Fitosli 29 9 • M:3 •a,,. I..,' Anna.2«4¢,I av Ac Ar (➢` O[ • 1:11,311./35:211SIT.11. 9: . / - „ ®< 1 E 6i l32 i h I ID OJ 16 E. ,4 u, 4.0 Iz, ,n no - t. xti:;. a ,�,,,9^I.e. -=rraeT" s1°.y ',:, .Is .,,• .».,el I .,. .. ».. ® v"• E"" i,l" S A4-B•1, IiA I S ;I 9 :S _ °.®`II , Alm,66a¢n Ax,A. li ., . R • I I. 61i 0 tA, e.z•m,� a yoPp..".ms�r 1! ., 3 - 2 _ -- e `_ kr I. a 6.4: `.1 Il © ®I ®' ., ,,,,., "©r »,. .„, uyemsa s: '°2I r ,� :a;-i n .,. ^,E -JI(• ° 1" :, a,�t:A ea",T ®5� a J .SE. 36211, , .=_'�''y° :^'' ,3..», •nmz F,• _ y SE 13STH PL. ° • ."3 r.,,we„«n A,A< .d. II ,.. ® a- Rs^I. LAN .`IIIV gA®la0a1/1/11H �'ilEDAli ,iiRIVER w� J Rq 3cn� , 11” ar 421 n0„iiRi. z 4 e OHO.,« soe Ac „ V ti 6E 139TX P -P ,° ,u S E, 3srH FIVE=:=A C R E A o^ ®. 1- mica lb: !� 011111111.111111. "»„ ii .,I ;1',. d .-1l_tu ygo.t ` I 'a-L.', yob jI w I o_ FR• F$.I 1'� Al D T "� ikt • . IPA �f �DD• 6 � b J01.n sc,w. � r &-- '-t16 tl I 'w�' w .• TRACTS i o law. »a, i wSr x;,,a,i-xI 11_.1E Emil •SE.1��I40TH PL- n+" ���6�� �MMIllik �, l' I.L. �e x < A 3 �P6;4T • '° --1_p w�^i LIfiiiilik ?, J�6 �W_r. I. nI '61 if ' 6 '.. l6 a—Rini di- • W :.. ra •ii111#YOt1R d. ,0411x- n.in it %.1 SE 142N0 ST t t, N ••SSE Ia2,N�Dy� ST. SE 142N0 Sf• ml ° .' ." � I Ni 15PEPIN.{ ilf �iE��// d 7° la V—"' ''. O�B�I a P11NESe c' u '� w'n 7� m D•e •• 3 I I� A0,,, r m =1,?x 3iF111® •Pp` , �D..•i O!■=�» mod Wi wWM - l s` T . . c» �l _ I. ,� _ H��'iliar. ul SE 143RD M. .a� ��e '1:::: .1.7:- i : . call, —' "sE--149TN-STD ..yam . s. z"xa `, I r NW 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP. 23 N., ROE. 5 E., W.M. I NOISING ONlallfls oa iN , mt j--•-v..._.... -w . __ ..ram.. ' MRCP I/T ROW I I V :. w b YC.` yt e z; AT COPIER I f .1"37.g%I i i - I i h - OIWER/APPLICANT L,e,q 1`, i 1. `..1 I 1 S` i ..I 1 CANER �' .,'J "^ I I 1�•' \I I 'I11 DAVID 4 NANCY JCVNDLN ..• 6 : 1 fl L 1 \ I,a, I , , _ , iGDI NE 4TM eTF>EET R',:t I �.§ W .}I RaT(+L wa eeDDe ;" 37 38 9};4 `a 9 3` J 2;\ a �;rfi z y5"`9 >1 :' APPLICANT. ti al,, ,` 9_ tt ., AMITEwww LLc , 'ITT....c. I -glow.\_, I v�''.• j o, .. 1$Q RT. I r' nQD BE WTH Dn¢tT ^ - ---• I I: -' ''; :o I I SCALE 1" = 40' L 1 I 1L , J �_ . _`rti -a--,,,..\1 ' 1 i w PLFI•NER/ENCaINEER/8LLR'vEYOR F. 8 j v N. J Qlamr CORE OEBIr4L INC.IN. i @ _,OAF N. • \ - '�\ +°�' 4205-WTN AYE "o . N `t ,w '4` <,' \tY J 6ELLEMIE.WCMIRGTCNW9EO01 <';.LL > 0� - S. \\ t j I; (CONTACT.LATE tERTaNBEN-F'I•m� m; �'� NE,3RD CT-C I,71 Davin r.>,tta(-e.wm.. - `\ t y LEGAL DESCRIPTION _ REw J.vaIDe eu .yx m ? ° 4,..., 1 THE lsmr HALF a THE NDReemr QUARTER a THE NOR weer Z • '? it"� I ~--- - • \''B:^\-- --`- is r ' `'"•' ' RM�N'EeEAD�T W BLL fE F1ERIVIa�N.MKNG•COQINmlr" SITE STATISTICS 3 y ).r +a" 1 1 I \x `I. ,6 1 YNBNNGrAF ryZ d .x.._�.i.. I yn •` t •� .I le t. e'i:,L [[ S +df 8`'I•,, c�rrcp(THE NORTH 47 IFFY TiffIECF CONYETFD TO KRG GOIMT SIDE r-B,eY comae lots 39 40 u•9.a vtY t, ^7• �. i4 6'; T t 5150206. n F PDeF2 eT DEED REearZDED wDER EeortDeYa ND. REAR-20• ct W z ' V c i 1 ,".BP. `� Tr a�4` �t......- TOTAL BITE AREA: 2E4755 BF.(463 ACRES) ° - ',c ,i____�o__.ti__�P `. ' } 1 IL', 1. PWOFYJ[ED WE. DDYLE FAMILY ICI'@D = t� •` ` 1 i fit • 1 .l ..1 ,1 i NO.Cr LOT& b W I `(`1'•` 6 i �� •.I ` \� {+� - SENCNMARlG aY:R.rt LOT ela. ,wD er. u •°y L $41t`,, I I l A' `�i I!I w'I b4,w..'. 4 / p I\ rI\ y�IT7-'' X ;, eaw I•IA.IeCe'O[OTT 0r IB`IiTRY BweYlY QV WVD RYG DAN7 F OBED DENSITY.4 N DIUAC WK,. 49==..;^,"` �, •�1. .. `I_?_._•_...... +RA .[�.. = 1' %-� ;Ii! �61.ae9 BBITACE DIDG N T4E NT.NE 41N eT.fDl.06TN Ff'£AA'11TTED DENSITY,D D1LAG BTJ.2..4 rE BE r____�O `� . O L_ I) I` EC.454.T1 CR(13BiN METERS) EXIDTBG TONNG: R-D ` ti.!:‘ III-'._-. -. STREET AREA: 9, . 4+ FL\.I ' Q r---6 1_i (',r;_ , ; PT'N .1'&E. 15W.DD eUFEACE DIeG Pl THE wr.eE vDTN er.. a L 5F.Oak.CF eRE1 4 '. I I :.4( 1! S"I r _ MAN aYi•BE eT�01@1 D�IGA�NAGE bMe DP.MS 141 Q eIJU 41 42 vao.r x� I zl.' tI , i f•... EL.641E40R(LL,OIl1ETERS) I. U cd �:; 'y• P f'I 15 i� `,M1[14,� \ APPROXIMATE LIX�1TICN OF CGNTCURB :DEMO W,,.f --- - .r I �; .•s... 1- , 1 14 .\i la .. _ .. NOT eu�veTTs I •� __ _ g11G�MY I - v�'H....„, x Q a.i `Y''. 'Cr6, Ili., icy r I;b•• i�i '�IiIYS' 9169 nnl mum • Y ',. m ,, 1 fc 1ni _'.�C e M "_11.I_ i • \`l r`. gIa. _•_ ___ IN �. O a is, ! T6-ycn : 4 � . �t•I 6'ZT • 4 S� F -L Q :P.1,14 4Si c n 22 c� 1 -� ` '•� n`\ tI_I ' ' ��l� �` a¢ a r I.=TM Bill,3, IN i . . --: Ntl• CC Z : , ... r i 4 BB„,u,. 0. 3B i y;,xaca ta>Ar• a t�%; .Irk 1"'.°"n" aril ? • ,:. .. Fib: y;11!_!inxulYL p / r �3}R�RR \ 1 ' o��i 1�ofE w 45 46 ... � .Tai•+a.awm,�w.eT 1, i n `.g°.or �,.eR} . ., ititt:vglimmilt/'� 3�i 3,/ ..4rt.n. Y�eO j� . .\ J L J L J I\ LI ' YYGY Y'YYYYYGYGY �a H = S L ^--�/ �'4. 4, canner �' \ nT.�YR eeR;io� B; N 66T 6'O6'W b 3 57 ; 11,;°- ''ll'V- �mmL_�P*l � r t _ Z m e i "na r°Om h+s a �� © " s ! " td/Ri ;� .._R.""� YS ,sT. fII¢f.. x D 5 a R,ry•Rm 3.�t; 'r•�m'e Two c=� •� 47 48 ( xi. s v ,,:tio'I 2,u,t�� ,; ... , Q 49 50 51 52 ( 53 ,3.3.302.1.33 I klYixY,•i�a°ma� I'Lao. 0. a 1 _ _ _ _ SHEET OF VICINITY MAPle I NEIGH80RNOOD DETAIL MAP PROJECT HEN 00059 NW 1/4,NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP. 23 N, R. 6 E, W.M. FOUND Y GAS DISK F 1 9 XW 74" 91 D E ow=PEXiDH --� 1Y . _ COOL PT.nest) z ta• ,D „ N.E. 4TH ST. —75 14—eeaZT If _��,�——T'—— —— Ens Y DOLL YEAS a `, Q DDM ODECr aDMN -—ffRm D%i '°°I 61 '` LEGAL DESCRIPTION — Y. Y uSTI .mR. D� _ \ NE EAST HALF OF NE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTNWE9T pU/J3T�i OF NE -��� m i.�.-..__-�-,�...- •� -'���-- "'^^-- — WARDER OF SECTION 14,TOWNSHIP 23 NORM RANGE ,1 . -} -„Lm„_-, W�HETIE MERIDIAN,IN k1NO LWNTY,WA9HINCTON; e , _ V. I IXCEPT THE NIXtTM 42 IFFY THEREOF RECORDING 70 TONG 0506 FOR ROAD ,o Y �T cGNER ''I �-.a•Q ., -tl U e1 w M 1 u iNN PURPOSES BY D®RECORDED UNDER NO.5790508. }y��'1�ae"gal ,, WI= ;; $ N BASIS OF BEARINGS , `i " `i<+ 1<11 nl I z I ^ N6BR2DE1S7L•R BETWEEN MONUMENTS/1851 RENTON H,IX28ZONTALNCONTROLIX Z$ AND DESCRIBED BELOW PERTY 8 - \\\.;',..- 111 . `` 1.1 1 O I NCl,tuttK PUREBRED NOV.15,1994 S � I BENCHMARK 6U _°_....,.._. 1 s, w \ I s .._, � -} I'1 - BENCH MARKS CITY OF RENTON SURVEY ON NAVD 19BB DATUM 3 ._ ......___.:.. .. _,_... I`I PT(1632 Y PER SURFALI DISC.W THE WT.NE 4TH ST.(SE Z. -M O ,x I ( 1281H ST.)h 148TH AVE iE '" ;m I SCALE 1 N = 40t EC.454.77 OR(136.614 METERS) Z Z PTi2103-BROKEN BRASS SURFACE DISC IN NE INT.S.E.126TH ST a h 156TH AVE S.E � Iv EL.547.94 OR(167.013 METERS) Q. \•c I /. SURVEY NOTES �° u z ° • . ':\ V` X.THE PUPrE OF MS DRAWING IS RRPN£BOUNDARY AND TGIX RANfl SURVEY PW '�• ° ,.�' i.`•1 I (^-__- 2 ExmOEIS INC DATE)MAY "' '� `` 'I I', 'i i Lk MOSIwlm RECORDS OF BOOK COUNTY.Mw9WCIDN. AZ DtA UNDER RECORDING M0. O1z .,,, , LEGEND <1Ju =• Al "•a a ` . SAIL TIME NFDIEIATOM sIHaN a MA YAP NAS®1 FNRACTCO FROM PAWL `/ �,• ` • y l • L, . / " I. I NMi,KMOT THE COMPANY SECOND ALTA EMYIMFNT NO.4G,]I,DATE)YJDART EL = • ~ • •y• \,.�. Al ,. , '.,,` 0 SANITARY SEYhA MANHOLE N A¢PNwO DNS MM,CURE CM.NAs CONDUCTED NO NNPDImR TOTE SEAROI ` : \ `�. I D OTIIM IRAN IS COESHOWN 1 TINE WP AND ANY OS➢O5➢BY THE AFFECTING N=P NNOORMiEST _ti.._.y.`iIT I CATCH BASIN TITLE COMPANY CaDTmrt, \ c ,s1 ••; r~r'.1 • A PROMO./ME .YN,TSY SLIME FEET(.e]t]2 ACRES). ." -Y\ '-6 >\ •-/ r ; C I • WATER METER 4i• S MOMS OHFR THAN THOSE SHORN MAY COST a TIES STE ONLY THOS:ETUDES N11N I'.:-,, CO D • POWER POLE DOOM CF TN.INSULATION MSBIE AT GROUND SURFACE ARE SHORN NULL k{} .°�N - '.. /`��Fr,'; . I J I ® WNNECTONS ARRSIORL 1 ASSSTRAIONT LOOS SAN ME EMEN AMACE ONLY. LOCATIONS BUT MAY b \� I. •', �`}„ 1 • ROCKERY COL MN BENDS OR CURVES NOT SHOWN SOME UNNRDRUND LOCATIONS SLONA HEREON Ct'` %%Yi t `,v,I>1. TANEN FROD PUBLIC RECORDS CONE DEEMS AS9NE5 NO DABIIIY FOR TIE Q Q A. \� r€L,T;�_ ,A ,I IF= -(_: I<I 1': 1 CONCRETE BEEN RECORDS. v _ IMPROVEMENT COMMONS DOSTLE ON • m °} _ - XDUSE x I ( .' I O I \ O.MS SURVEY�115 MOIRE SURVEY 6861RB4 G1ED AS.FOUND.p99 RECOVERED N! (. O g: ' "° 1 C CEDAR THIS LAKOECT N APRIL OF 1N5 1 \ 1 N i� gP �NA�AREN�T. a o '- -' ,; • I i i '�4t -f mi -._ (H CHERRY A WS 6 A FIELD TRAVERSE SURVEY. A SOWA FT.SECOND EEM.=TOTAL.STATION N O h CD CD -_ _\... .. i, \ �G. ::•+ `s 1 1 i V �' MS USED TD MEASURE TIE ANGULARND DISTANCE ,�iaBT �T�ME fe m a x AS TRASERS `-f-'_-` ..". �. �NI I 1 J 1 �'., N•{a,G of \ COT COTTONWOOD pRUD Ent N MAC 132-1 DI MOLINE STANCE UEAMELRNG OR S C3 S �`F •_11:......_. ._1` N • `''•: GARAGE -..• THE SLISHEY.5� I N I I TAN N.C.BASELINE R1NN 0&YEAR 6 ME COTE 6 O vv.'. R \ I VAP T, I I>I �`:;�;.T}Z F FIR PROPERTY COWERS NM SEC N COMJLNCTON MTH MS SURVEIL. ~ 11,,.. G�IC] `.` `., L__w!... I T T TVA H •MDNLOIX O W W F '' "> i" • I M ♦ FFyyny h 2 ^; •a9 W _ .., ,r \, �. \ _1 I ��.\ M MAPLE o, i Ca O \ ` .._.. OF'OSEDPER THE NC}ONl0UR5 14 T OF 6 Q N ~� MAPLENOOD ESTATES Q• yW.. .................:__ - V 1Ns C3 P / '� II � 1 �� Z Om az (, r »>_ RENTON ' . : CITY re 4 gt au� - ; FwRD 4 88'18..5 WI:-, r_'327:57- 5..,_" • • '44 w J .1 btl i6Rr -- - `:.. ' , FwXD Ira.K ri JAN mN fin! rc Mc•mtiezTr I vI a E COMER 6 1 aa,FaeE I w O Q r I`':. ! ' ) -'P1•;-. _)I-dG DIVISION eDi vI NITY MAP SHEET OF_ I l 1 ---- cI I••5DD0'A A 1 1 `..Y?....... __.�. L I^ ..,I_... 1 - _-•-.,....-.__.._.._. PROJECT NUMBER 0006a MR j a jI J, .�III \ I �,w,•° NICI I Ilj ` I" I,I J pr I w I . a �`I'} JtgJ.Ll 6[fir y�. • • 1 J ,1 u` JiI 1 di __ I JSNOJ.LI IS6 ig II N rl . ? k I G N Co R N 1 11.•, Sul _ 6V it a A" I w �� of 1 a ;; I c Rnw I :g II I I ° ydA, o , ..y •�•oF,.c Ir n �:rww.r Ili 1 pV,�1' A •Ol•ya. '/„ s° III I I 2. 1 — .a a '°. I i I ,)6 m erg: — N IS Z ,1B �~ , 9' , , eG,� I I'e •f 490 �.. I� Is. , i , • ml SWMNW .— I I ,m '� + .R1Rr Aro/•ea II -P R �L r--r c 9• i 0 li gI N N cfl�1 A: I '1 '� I •� ' I� �. 411 , A \ Y r,,z :—/ cc I c b$ W ``- In-T-1 vF `.\\ ,Ir sl I n 1 r ...k. • <, • �`=�� I/���� •'U ' ,• e�. •ji •,mod �_ III 3 iI ,1 2 .11 /i ° 1 I ,% , I. / I J I I'l rri ` PI p t InI I! , %/ / i1 I ' / / I I1 I T , I / i / I' ,7 I / I 1 i / I ; i ii ; I , , Ij All 13 N w I PR] t; W ggA2rx '. N 2 nt2. 0 I i ch i §1 k1;1 ii..1 a il 3 2o s2 a R g 2 g g !'r g k € g S I I a I ; g go Agra .1;!- i 1 iii Illib /1E li )- i II I .(-71 Iji / i R ii I NW 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP. 23 N, R. 5 E, W.M. ° DATE NC EA/eER z 2000 TREE CUTTING& CLEARING PLAN I'""... ""`°"' zip, v m DESIGNED CAFE HERMANSEN O 'DRAWN F.KATONA AMBERWOOD 01 c APPROVED NORTHWEST BROKERS,AMBERWOOD LL C. CORED Ev """'®'fa g"'ems"" m 2.' o OVA/C.0 KRUEGER 19129 SE 145TN ST PROJECT MANAGER RENTON, WA 98059 ENGINEERING• PLANNING• SURVEYING NW 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. - N.E. 4TH ST. D,e.. = - - t..•, 2110 80 -_ oam SCALE: 1" 40' _ 'r�Y°`cml,w ;.I \ ' r__ A_-i ,'\_ E ^1 , j _ ,\ OUNER/APPLIG�WT $ e � - II n ', ' ' a i "" c 'I BENCHMARK acavF°iD.wAeler.lawaw '6:11111411kk e : \I , \ , L o \ 'rl N.1_,1'N 6G»I t�ATM STREET J7 jg I g ,p. I ir',Q "�a W Et?YJH DYANCD H'ER cItt of H�NroN 61mreY R Nnw r eo DAnr �rucam �.• �� I�_so1-V ��1 �'' T _ ___ IQ MISSY•S•ERASE SURFACE DIeG N THE NT.NE 4TH BT.(SE OWN MSS TM STREET \ n, I' ETJ I Ib1N AVE OE \' EG 4e4.T OR Mail.DETERS, E o e S f ' I U 5 PP41O8•BhLT�d ERASE SURFACE DISC IN THE INT.SE.MOTH ST.I iI7 «" • '�s D ISSN AVE SE FLAMER/ENGINEER/SURVEYOR , > n = _- I+. Ill�� 1 if.. H I El-e4T.S4 R061013 METERS, �"'=''\ J ' E.�11tS•�1 .' " fII CORE DESIGN. C. 4011.AYE.NE.euEr9]co f i ? 0. "1 h. 2 ilerilIELIM F rill%lireira gel �13 - A�XMATEL 1TItx1 OF CGNTDIIA k3ELLE:AE,uNSNNiTg190D01 I'i�� NOT SURVEYED (4M)OBD-lBT € lLIITADT CAE£NERIANSQIE.�PHIs,r 7 ' _OOKI nca DKEVN avID J.VAHDEWNbQ!-&rvw �e'�- Z F s. 1irt iT R/W arSITE STATISTICS ! 2Ta S\ ' `____ •n//GY CEMENT CEMENT CMNCREIE6 CDVCRE/F 90EWAU' YERnCAC CO/RB Q IX/TI£R EXCAVATIGN APOD Y. _ , 'I I I` S.E. f2BTH PL. HWANTENT 4pcOCY. 1 ��� `T1_ ___--., L , L\_____: i. I Z I \ l� NO wuF w III�I , I� `w "it . r 1 ill 11/4- '- �2• R/" STRUCTURAL FILL SLOPE V S L \ i 41 1 " _ MEND ROAD b 41 11,.yj1'II • t I'r EX/BnNC CONCAVE DIN J.S. 6ID�3' l.s' MATCH COSMIC OR FEATHER f�. V ICI ol� _' \ .a psi I (r �; �� WIDTH I 1 ?. INTO NEW O£9GW OiADE. ` Q J l 1, L__ y GRADE T EAISRNC GROUND Z , LINE 5,2_ . e s&1- elm I \\I3 II ilk .._....' _MLII �111% I SHOULDER I I OVERIDICAEAIE DITCHPRONOE A.SUITABLE SI/B-RAISE s'CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK QJ O o' �� 5, L I\ ,\\\L-11..Ili U �/ - AREA ro COAENT CONCRETE 1ERnG1 CURB (6•WICK IN DRIVEWAYS !CO • l I A11 AND d/TIFR 4 ;HICK ELSEWHERE) q .c �` i' ,L :..I iT '12'1 A 11�' n T� $ aS Qvv l e a it D" »T��- ' `Y: S.E. 128TH ST. HALF-STREET IMPROVEMENTS M l Q ra II g ,. �.�.. _, ems-- _�;\��. W 4} L 44 1 \\ �C.C�!!S�,_r'1,\��' .\ s_, NO SCALE w m �C N fir . "°°..' ft CS = owl. �i� ze .S.5. y C Iambs I¢eTecr Iwow �� ��,,�,...' �J _J L \ CEMENT LYWCRE/E \ CONCRETE SIDEWALK A �nl `r THICK 2VENr s� -1 \ VERncAC CURB R GUTTER 43 46—_� 'i M .,„, I `-- 11'1 \ 1 SECTION B-B l i c J L____ j 9 0 1 .1 J 162ND AVE. S E. HALF STREET IMPROVEMENTS a 8 a 7 8 ` NO SUE n ,r a k e o 0.3E or comm` ,e 'Iem.Ir¢^.� rn'x®_ 1 2 D, w , T. ¢`1 7 r , , L I I a 4S 49 �p `I S2 R�S� ` o p 1 SHEET a OF f `I �`h PR 00059 Smooth Feed SheetsTM ' Se-7-U e template for 5160® Ob-1Sc� J W MORRISON INC CENTEX HOMES RIBERA-BALKO ENTERPRISES PO Box 407 , 2320 130Th Ave NE#200 j 16400 Southcenter Pkwy#30 Kenmore, WA 98028 I Bellevue, WA 98005 I 'Seattle, WA 98188 112305 9004 1 112305 9011 112305 9015 i 1 Terry L Olding , Mullins Family Trust The ' Mullins Family Trust The 12614 148Th Ave SE 118631 120Th Ave SE 18631 120Th Ave SE Renton, WA 98059 ! Renton, WA 98058 Renton, WA 98058 112305 9017 1 112305 9018 � 1112305 9020 — , Dean J& Carolyn L Mullenberg ': Dean J& Carolyn L Mullenberg Charles Lackey 5816 NE 4Th St I 1 1 12622 148Th Ave SE I 5902 NE 4Th St Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 ,Renton, WA 98059 112305 9021 112305 9023 i 112305 9030 1 ( I ) 11, NG PROPERTIES LLC ; Mark C &Lynnette M Rogers i FINER HOMES INC 6234 139Th P1 SE 1 15240 SE 132Nd St ' 1 1215 120Th Ave NE#201 1 Bellevue, WA 98006 1 Renton, WA 98059 I 'Bellevue, WA 98005 112305 9093 , 142305 9003 1142305 9004 ! Baljinder&Rashpal Buttar , FINER HOMES INC II RIBERA-BALKO ENTERPRISES 5766 146Th Ave NE 11215 120Th Ave NE#201 116400 Southcenter Pkwy#30 Bellevue, WA 98007 ' I Bellevue, WA 98005 I ,Seattle, WA 98188 142305 9016 142305 9017 I ' 142305 9021 Josaphat&Assumpta Hong I I KING COUNTY , j Irvin Leifer 15409 SE 128Th St ' 500 K C Admin Bldg ' ' 15223 SE 128Th St Renton, WA 98059 1 i Seattle, WA 98104 i ;Renton, WA 98059 142305 9062 ' 1 142305 9063 , 11142305 9064 - - ' - Kenneth Paul Smith Sr. Randall D &Rosemary M Leifer , F KING COUNTY 15402 SE 132Nd St 5127 S Fountain St 500 4Th Ave 1 Renton, WA 98059 , i Seattle, WA 98178 , Seattle, WA 98104 142305 9069 ; i 142305 9070 1142305 9071 -- ----- - - - --- KING COUNTY 1 , William W Mason II Marilyn L Kelloniemi 500 4Th Ave I 1113111 156Th Ave SE 1 23629 7Th Ave W Seattle, WA 98104 I I Renton, WA 98059 I Bothell, WA 98021 142305 9072 142305 9073 ; 142305 9079 z i , FIRE DISTRICT 25 I Sound Energy&Elec Puget I I Carl T&Kathleen R Godsoe 1055 S Grady Way ' PO Box 90868 ' ,9201 Blackberry St#11 Renton, WA 98055 . ' Bellevue, WA 98009 ; Anchorage, AK 99515 j142305 9095 1142305 9106 ' ' 142305 9114 Lon A Crosslin Michael G& Shaunna J Tacher i Walter L Bonson 15430 SE 132Nd St 1 15514 SE 132Nd St 1 12452 155Th Ave SE Renton, WA 98059 i Renton, WA 98059 I I 'Renton, WA 98059 142305 9115 I 142305 9116 j 1935330 0690 6 AVERY® Address Labels 1 Laser 5160® , Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 5160® 1 Martin J Goonan ' Marcellena M Bilodeau , i Ron A Herger Jr. 12610 155Th Ave SE ' 12618 155Th Ave SE ' 112626 155Th Ave SE ' Renton, WA 98059 I Renton, WA 98059 I Renton, WA 98059 935330 0700 , 1 935330 0710 ' 1 1 935330 0720 ' II > — 11 - - Jolene Maggard I ' Dolores S Shines 1 I I Harold F Knab Jr. 16023 SE 135Th St 12638 155Th Ave SE 112646 155Th Ave SE Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 . Renton, WA 98059 935330 0730 935330 0740 1 935330 0750 William R&Ida M Cummings Robert N Sims 11 Emil &Rosemary A Nelson 1 12652 155Th Ave SE 12815 SE 218Th Pl 7219 S 128Th St Renton, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98031 1 Seattle, WA 98178 935330 0760 935330 0770 111935330 0780 ) ' ) Ernest C &Mary Jane Sawyer Scott A&Danette C Van Ditto j Kenneth&Lind Christianson 12657 155Th Ave SE ' 12651 155Th Ave SE I 112643 155Th Ave SE Renton, WA 98059 , Renton, WA 98059 ; I Renton, WA 98059 935330 0790 935330 0800 ' 1935330 0810 I ' Andrea C Shane Joshua C Lee III Chandra&Randi C Segaran 12635 155Th Ave SE 12627 155Th Ave SE 1 12619 155Th Ave SE Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 1 Renton, WA 98059 ' 935330 0820 935330 0830 i 935330 0840 r, -- , i - - I , - Ruth E Deshaw I ' Ruth E Deshaw 12611 155Th Ave SE ' ' 12611 155Th Ave SE 1 F Renton, WA 98059 ' Renton, WA 98059 I 935330 0850 ; 935330 0860 ; I ! I I I II 11 I I 1 , r - Ir I , 11 I r ;- i 1 1 1 1 1 I ' I , ® AVERY® Address Labels 1 Laser 5160® LlA A - 00 - 11-0 , . . 101001 111110111111 111111 10 . Return Address: City Clerk's Office , City of Renton 200209i1001255 , • 1055 South Grady Way CITY OF RENTON BS 20.00 • Renton,WA 98055 PAGE 00113F 002 09/11/2002 11:43 KING COUNTY, WA . . BILL OF SALE Property Tax Parcel Number: Project Ffig if:A wow)b Street Intersection: Address:Gt. ,oe. Li.% s."- R5/14-7.1., rk _ Reference Number(s)of Documents assigned or released:Additional reference numbers are on page . Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1...0 1. 1-Cts t1/41,Gr 0...L.P.S. )c- vontiss ab. . 1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation LO 2. . CN The Grantor,as named above,for,and in consideration of mutual benefits,hereby grants,bargains,sells and delivers to .r.— the Grantee,as named above,the following described personal property: C) WATER SYSTEM: Length Size Type CD L.P.of ,, Water Main L.F.of ,, Water Main L.F.of ,, Water Main •=r— each of " Gate Valves C..7 't each of " Gate Valves each of Fire Hydrant Assemblies (.. \si SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM: Length Size Type CD q 3,3 L.F.of 4s ,, --. Sewer Main (---:,D 5- 5-9 ”r L.F.of ,, • Sewer Main L.F.of . " Sewer Main CsA 3 each of 4,,, " Diameter Manholes each of " Diameter Manholes each of " Diameter Manholes STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM: Length Size Type A- w-9'c 9-- ( I I b L.F.of ,, Storm Line L.F..of 1 Zi 5, _ Storm Line L.F.of ,, Storm Line A each of " C,ONNIL Storm Inlet/Outlet 6 each of ' " I. Storm Catch Basin .1 each of ATI' " z Manhole , ,r4.1 22C. w STREET IMPROVEMENTS: (Includinl'Curb,Gutter,Sidewalk,Asphalt Pavement) Curb,Gutter,Sidewalk I TAS L.F. Asphalt Pavement: aocr, SY or L.F.of Width STREET LIGHTING: #of Poles By this conveyance,Grantor will warrant and defend the sale hereby made unto the Grantee against all and every person or persons,whomsoever,lawfully claiming or to claim the same. This conveyance shall bind the heirs,executors, administrators and assigns forever. ".i rx.:'"?_,.r;tr_-\,to."27 1-1:\FILE.SYSTRM\84HNDOIMBILLSALE.DOC\MAB Page 1 , Form 84 0001/bh IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. ' 'cQS,C INDIVIDUAL FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that • signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: • Dated: REPRESENTATIVE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT with in Seal must be box STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss COUNTY OF KING ) C\J I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument,on oath stated that he/she/they was/were authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the and _ of to be the free and voluntary act of such party/parties for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. CD Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: CD Dated: CNA CORPORATE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss COUNTY OF KING ) 200,Z _ On this :41 day of Jf t.y , 1'9c<before me personally appeared r /C1l 1 JUhn I• L '1 to me known to i Q�.•' v- •��110 be Pr`QS1 L. kt9 of the corporation that r to ; executed the within instrument,and acknowledge the said instrument to be the free Q O NOTARY 9 70 1, and voluntary act and deed of said corporation,for the uses and purposes therein , mentioned,and each on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said / • I' N� . PUBLIC ® instru ent and that the seal affixed is th corporate seal of said corporation. 11 6• oho 1 N a/(.LLL lt-fA/lg °° Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) f}cLr t a r2 iQ fLe.aC G't ncL2,r My appointment expires: 3-11 - 06 Dated: 7Ja4/a Z.- Page 2 CIT1 RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator > Jesse Tanner,Mayor CITY CLERK(2) CITY OF RENTON October 11 , 2001 OCT 1 9 2001 ECEIVED CITY C ERK S OFFICE SUBJECT: NEW PLATS AND SHORT PLATS IN THE CITY OF RENTON TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Please see attached new plats that have just been addressed. Please add these addresses and streets to your City directories and maps. Amberwood Plat PP 00-150 Claybo Short Plat — Highpointe Short Plat — Howard-Orstad Short Plat sEP-0/-07-C Johnston Short Plat itP_01-0o Langham Short Plat si1P-0/-OrS Monterey Place Short Plat — Morgan Place North Plat — Morgan Place Plat PP-0/ 0027 Morgan Court Plat Ridgley Plat PP-Of-O ST Smith Short Plat S. cerely, Jan Conklin Development Services Representative Development Services Division Telephone: 425-430-7276 #1 :utilltr 1901r-2001 1055 South Grady Way- Renton, Washington 98055 w (fir r ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer - :eft I. • NW 1/4 NW 1/4 SEC • . 14, TWP. 23 M. ROE 6 E., W.M. • • • _.----------_..__ 100Z p C NV -- • '� \ II M111Y 1111L1( y)yNOLOyW 0 t.,A i,—5---"-',7------g-3.v-7:7- k , ,......4____\___ • To MOP a r- ---- 1 - 1 1 1 lY e4�'nMYIO r-- -� ^�"-, -_-=tt • , 1 1 \ OUNER/AITLICANT • i I w S l t ' I Y4•.I a I. 18 t aY.ala 14/1I I t111 � '` Iti i d l�'fY�,Y1{ I • "1 \ u '�� .. I °Aw A4114 STRUT JONY1pN A•.h �: k 1 1 1 1 ^1 trGiol is 1TN�TIo} A..!f),....•�A 37 'i a '. I k 38 , 1 •10 I I.1 AFl L CAYYr. I 1 {{� • \\*�'11Y ,j•v114�yM.N 4. I .�.. + , .i 1ww I.t1 ; k�I1'IWIw+dinar o \may _ ,� ;� ; �• ? L a :; .SCALE: 1" 40' („'a;�+"°'�°° � x 1.-- - .,_ \i I .. p k • rL?!'NER/ENGUdEER2kiRvE70R NI 1 SP .hll•1 ......_ tlas-IYITIIAK Ni.KITE 71Y0 GORR DMA PM i;� R Ate'\''h•., \w \' `\ \' ~ ...• 1 I I ` J.�Nf 1-M7<1EwlArrp4'Ln.MD)4413,11111- 71' Iq z. tits `'` \\ Aa cr:� \ \'•;� I 11611. I.ii LEGAL DESCRIPTION °4�+rv'""Aw.�cA"�ctN+..w• $i zz �'_ -_1• 1... ,ZA t \ \`� 1 •i• aMi,Ymwle Q"�'ilao'TYE ."o1m,'A`auwnlr°w°`�ecO1\iw+THE iY.rwNwrx✓1 I , i 1, Yv s .1'D;e�%;�e�`" r NORTH,PLA�0wLILIL IarluERlxaNivueawn. - SITE STATISTICS ` I Y41 Ns I I 1, Y \ 1 r r NWIIYi1171i • Mn1AP(r MOOT-r ,Y t�' i''I i. Ise IP 1 -'11 MOM Ma NORTH u PUT NOW*ecNmi°TO Rru N:au(Ir 11D[ V.r'«"r w V39—.}.-...^••_._•-40--r-,P.f , a, .r 1 ' I . roR MID rwroxs fir wp°I�CWa°Nala�I�eWorb Na RRAL•la Z • 1Q' • f.�Y�,(:� 1 p -4.1 I ,"`.,k 4 .,\____ , TOIY.s11{MM f0�7lY YL(W.ACJtYL L_ .. ♦J1 I t I FlCPGM°IM1. srpya INTLr NOy (MI .' . ,\P , NFL —�j,1 I 1. 44 — ` It 1 \ R0.aLOIr • r = d i I L 'Th \ • • WIsh ' •BENCHMARK4 4 ' r7-Y§ 5\I FIRM.Y SRAM sRAA°4G PILL NLIp Inl K. C/1N ravrtm DENIM WPC • 1TJ(NNN Awl w • ('---- .��¢1 L____ 1. J�.. •. Yo�� RC.YI.TI on mama WSW IDE1TIItl IaN1Ys. Rn ,.y. r--- h' II^_ -1 I I ''• IT/p)•MOON Mai sRKi IirG N t1 M.Nls.GM 1T.• SOW AMA. !WI SP.(14"O'1m) W 41 42 �yy" ' 7 ` ' I f ' y' • X ►641A.s�i at MILD WM*/ • ORR MACSY e \'{��1`. b? I r .4:. •1 I <r-, 11ow1aRANAoa w/11r nt+al0u I. • ,_ r �- • y-' • _ 1 . JAY µ •41.:', ----- Arrw°<Iun LOCATION w Gaffe*** .-- I,'� vX s Il -nn--_� �'` f I f !rr"" 1 n ILaI'.. ••` 'P3YG7C�I��y I -^ „ } "' 'T6,i IF . rN `i i if', IS,I' ..,•-- NOT SLAM= fN°I' Q -� . 1''1.-1 N Q.�. Vyi ° g ' " ....6 0 0 1 Al 97>AL. Is. . • / G \� � • • ', �A� _W_ �� L_ y►YJ• re.l, ,` 111S■Ir,p �ra,L:' i a CC.0{., 2 :'T_---4. i .`` \, C_ Val--_•�: • ,. . • ^lA 5 �a 11p�A—lspM 3ca ryY `i_l wf 43 •44 \ Y --a o nitg, 11I711 �aRI1�1 w •`V �1 \'�[ \ • 1 • `// e ` `.W ..• .,,,......., ~ r`�tb.7i i!� ,I411'li w c\ e s 'IA11 u C �\ EIpp?❑❑ I��77�e6yy7,22!!��yyl!pp�e�l��Inir ry � � W Qi. 'Y-Y 1i., �Lj.111jbbb�{\\\ - -- ,' .._. Cii tit ti:i 1���%' {Y - ) ` \ i .'� r- - __ 1 Al 1:10! I�1��' r 1� +.+ram.-ri r• "a:al' % '�— 'W.." Wrl I -I- I 1` :' .;•Y'�,,,p l�Ari.I�__p_tt �./Y .'°�I t; r9�r_! 3 56.J/ /� �� "\.y _� DIY. _. . 1 .... 1131141111131.. Y-...,t•,,,,'Ir •fX14•11 , /13f3E/iEfal Y.11 I r I 5 'V 11 \ `'\ s� 'COnI�✓�9,1 ��' �J`leyp"d�} y ItMlla Ord �4 : t+�AGT ` id. I ;aI {I s P\ 1 'uNIilli T:�.�'y ,�___ w 45 46 \s �y\..OY..«.•m.o.V 1 1 1 "li ••• 1 1+ 1 " YYYY ...���}'a i\IgM1.,,wM \ i'��I i I RENTON Igild �'1' !��. Z °� '( t \ �� L W J L_ ____J L J Y ` fin. �-..•n � _�YYYAYYYYYYYYYYCYI���r • 7s I l I III �1 © 1 li �'�,.. CCS 1 i • • • w .��JY` OIMtm ®iGS^M..:In 11fYL'YYYYYYI�j® $$$� b u R. /J• N 007a'Os'.W 3TI/rouml bMJ ..._.- _ n IR r ! N ��iY�.,�CM1��"j .0 o.M1RM1c^6eM1.{•�CC Ya1 I(YYO, 104•i yf�YY."j r I..;,: 10.�wiuy f Y k �1 �!� YO Y\u:-"ao�o v�• l3 giv1043.O1 IRON Y°Nun iiwe^=`I.�I±�:�). i 'Pi.Cl �ts��R ee�'�'I�N� b 47 48 ra w or -� `Y =IRy 97:u- .I, .u> > �wt�lr+`v iUQy� 49 50 51 52 53I iYlYkYi�:r!:Yii:w[;g5 �I=f�'i,:,�f� '11E• SHEET OF • ) VICINITY MAP _ ® NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP 1 1 \.N •I••1pppO I'• PROJECT MUY1L 1 00050 July 23,2001 Renton City Council Minutes Page 246 Plat: Dalpay,Vicinity of NE Development Services Division recommended approval,with conditions,of the 19th St&Redmond Ave NE Dalpay final plat; 29 single-family lots on 4.80 acres located in vicinity of NE (FP-01-050) 19th St.,Redmond Ave.NE, Queen Ave.NE and NE 21st St. (FP-01-050). Council concur. (See page 248 for resolution.) Plat: Stone Lane, Queen Ave Development Services Division recommended approval,with conditions,of the NE(FP-01-083) Stone Lane final plat; 14 single-family lots on 1.51 acres located on Queen Ave.NE between NE 4th and 6th Streets (FP-01-083). Council concur. (See page 248 for resolution.) Executive: Sister City Executive Department recommended approval of an Agreement for Sisterhood Agreement with Cuautla, between the Cities of Cuautla,Jalisco„Mexico, of the Mexican United States, Jalisco,Mexico and Renton,Washington, of the United States of America, at the official signing ceremony on August 17,2001. Refer to Community Services Committee. Utility: WRIA 9 Interlocal Executive Department requested approval of amendments to the Water Agreement Amends, CAG-01- Resource Inventory Area(WRIA) 9 Interlocal Agreement(CAG-01-005)which 005 relate to representation on the WRIA 9 Forum and WRIA 9 Forum Management Committee. Council concur. Plat: Amberwood,NE 4th St Hearing Examiner recommended approval,with conditions, of the Amberwood (PP-00-150) preliminary plat; 18 single-family lots located on 4.63 acres located on NE 4th St.between Lyons Ave. SE and Rosario Ave. SE(PP-00-150). Council concur. Plat: Honey Creek Hill,NE Hearing Examiner recommended approval,with conditions, of the Honey Creek Sunset Blvd(PP-01-024) Hill preliminary plat; 16 single-family lots on 2.71 acres located at NE Sunset Blvd., west of Union Ave.NE and north of NE 12th St. (PP-01-024). Council concur. Plat: Morgan Place,NE 4th St Hearing Examiner recommended approval, with conditions, of the Morgan &Lyons Ave NE(PP-01-028) Place preliminary plat; 46 single-family lots on 15.89 acres located at NE 4th St. and Lyons Ave.NE(PP-01-028). Included was letter from David Halinen, dated July 16,2001,withdrawing related street vacation petition(VAC-01- 002). Council concur. Technical Services: 2001-2004 Technical Services Division requested approval of the 2001-2004 Surveying Surveying Services Roster Services Roster which contains a list of nine professional land surveying firms as follows: Bush,Roed&Hitchings; CTS Engineers,Inc.; David Evans and Associates; Entranco,Inc.; Inca Engineers,Inc.; Penhallegon Associates; Ringel &Associates; Triad Associates; and W&H Pacific,Inc. Council concur. Utility: Memo of Utility Systems Division requested approval of a Memorandum of Understanding on Impact Understanding with Washington State Depai tnient of Transportation(WSDOT) Mitigation for I-405/SR-167 to allow the use of City property for mitigation to riparian habitat impacts along Interchange,WSDOT Rolling Hills Creek as a result of construction activities associated with the I- 405/SR-167 Interchange Flyover Project. Council concur. (See page 248 for resolution.) Police: Yakima County Police Department requested approval of agreement with Yakima County for Contract for Jail Services the housing of inmates in the Yakima County Jail. Budgeted amount is $451,300. Refer to Public Safety Committee. Police: Jail Contract Executive Depai tment requested approval of a resolution to authorize the Negotiations with King Mayor to appoint Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington to the Joint County Negotiating Oversight Group, and Police Chief Garry Anderson to the CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI #: O•tel SUBMITTING DATA: FOR AGENDA OF: 1 _ 3 A 0I Dept/Div/Board.. HEARING EXAMINER Staff Contact... Fred J. Kaufman, ext. 6515 AGENDA STATUS: Consent XX SUBJECT: Public Hearing.. Amberwood Preliminary Plat Correspondence.. File No. LUA00-450,PP,ECF Ordinance Resolution Old Business.... EXHIBITS: New Business.... Study Session... Hearing Examiner's Report and Recommendation Other RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPROVALS: Legal Dept Council Concur Finance Dept.... Other FISCAL IMPACT: N/A Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.. Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated... SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Hearing Examiner's Report and Recommendation on Amberwood Preliminary Plat was published on March 5, 2001. There were no requests for reconsideration and the appeal period ended on March 19,2001. The Examiner recommends approval of the proposed preliminary plat, subject to the conditions outlined on pages 5 and 6 of the Examiner's Report and Recommendation. This office notes that the conditions placed on this project are to be met at later stages of the platting process. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Amberwood Preliminary Plat. March 5,2001 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION APPLICANT: Steven Beck Amberwood LLC 10129 SE 145th Street File No.: LUA00-150,PP,ECF LOCATION: The project is located on NE 4th Street,at Rosario Avenue NE in northeast Renton SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Subdivide an approximately 4.63 acre property into 18 lots suitable for detached,single family houses SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on January 31,2001. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report,examining available information on file with the application,field checking the property and surrounding area;the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the February 6, 2001 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday,February 6,2001, at 9:00 a.m.in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: ' Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Preliminary Plat application,proof of posting,proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: Boundary and Topographic Survey Exhibit No.4: Preliminary Utility,Grading, Elevation&Drainage Plan Exhibit No.5: Tree Cutting and Clearing Plan Exhibit No.6: Zoning Map The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner,Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way,Renton, Washington 98055. The area of the proposed development is currently undergoing a great deal of transition, and has been recently annexed into the City of Amberwood Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA00-150,PP,ECF March 5 2001 Page 2 Renton. The applicant has proposed subdivision of an approximately 201,755 sf property into 18 lots suitable for detached, single family houses. The lots would range in size from 7,200 sf to 8,884 sf. The property is zoned R-5,which allows a maximum of five dwelling units per net acre. Approximately 37,669 sf of the site, 18.6 percent,would be streets. This is a higher percentage than typical in a residential plat,partially due to the lack of development of streets in the area. The Examiner asked why the Environmental Review Committee(ERC)imposed the more stringent stormwater standards, if there are no critical areas on the property. Ms.Higgins replied that the area of the Highlands has experienced a great deal of problems with surface water runoff,partially due to Maplewood Creek. The City is also imposing the more recent,stricter King County drainage standards in this area, so that greater retention can be accommodated on properties. There are no wetlands on the property,but the general concern in this area has caused the City to impose the newer King County standards. The applicant has requested a modification from the City of Renton Street Standards,which would allow the public right-of-way to be narrowed from 50 feet to 42 feet. That modification request has been approved. The existing structures on the site would be removed,and approximately 7,500 cubic yards of fill would be re- graded on the site. The ERC issued a Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated. The mitigation measures include quite a few that relate to stormwater control and the prevention of erosion during the construction of the project. Additional mitigation measures include Transportation,Fire and Parks mitigation fees,and the recommendation that the geotechnical report be followed during design and construction. Ms.Higgins reviewed the project's consistency with Preliminary Plat Criteria. The project proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan land use designation of Residential Rural. It does not endanger any environmentally sensitive areas. The land is going to be developed into large lots,which is consistent with the transition area of the City. One of the policies of the Residential Rural plan is that development densities be a maximum of five homes for every net acre. The project is also consistent with the Transportation Element and the Environmental Element of the Comprehensive Plan. The underlying zoning designation complies with all the requirements of the R-5 development standards. The minimum lot size is 7,200 sf,with some lots quite a bit larger. The lots all exceed the lot depth and meet the lot width requirements. The lot arrangement is logical, with lot lines at right angles to the street. Each lot has access to a public street or road,with Lots 11, 12, 14 being accessed by easements. Access to the project would be primarily from NE 4th Street via the new road, Rosario Avenue NE, which would extend, offset from NE 3rd Street, into a cul-de-sac. Because the area has been annexed,the City is prepared to provide all services,with two exceptions. Water is proved by Water District 90. The applicant will be required to obtain a"will serve".letter from Water District 90. The property lies within the Issaquah School District,and is therefore subject to school impact fees. Staff recommends approval of the project, subject to the following conditions: (1)compliance with the ERC mitigation measures,(2)a"will serve"letter must be obtained from Water District 90 prior to obtaining building permits,(3)the applicant shall either draft and record a Homeowners' Association or a maintenance agreement for the maintenance of all common improvements,(4)the applicant shall dray Issaquah School District impact Fees prior to building permits,(5)the applicant shall post a sign on NE 3r Court at the east property boundary stating that the street is subject to future extension, and(5)construction easements obtained from abutting property owners may be necessary prior to construction of retaining walls on or near property lines. Lafe Hermansen,3333 164th Street SW,Linwood,WA 98037 stated that he is the planner for the applicant. The applicant is in agreement with the staff report,and Mr.Hermansen is present to answer any questions. The Examiner asked for clarification of the construction easements on the property. Amberwood Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA00-150,PP,ECF March 5 2001 Page 3 David Cayton, Core Design,4205 148th Avenue NE,Bellevue,WA 98007 said that no retaining walls are planned for the southwest area of the property. Mr. Cayton stated he is also the engineer for the Maplewood project. Grading can be designed so that both the rear of the lots of Maplewood and the rear of the lots at Amberwood can be benefited by making a smoother transition between plats. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak,and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 9:26 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS &RECOMMENDATION Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Steven Beck,filed a request for approval of an 18-lot Preliminary Plat together with two tracts. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official,issued a Declaration of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M)for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located on the south side of NE 4th Street between Lyons Avenue SE(146th Avenue SE in King County)on the west and Rosario Avenue SE(152nd Avenue SE in King County)on the east. NE 4th Street is SE 128th in King County. The subject site is on the eastern edge of the Highlands area of the City. 6. The subject site is approximately 4.63 acres in area. The parcel is rectangular. The subject site is approximately 615.62 feet long(north to south)by approximately 327 feet wide. 7. The subject site slopes approximately 6 percent or approximately 42 feet from the northeast corner to the southwest corner. 8. The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 4760 enacted in April 1999. 9. The subject site is currently zoned R-5 (Single Family- 5 dwelling units/acre). 10. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of single family uses at a rural density. 11. There is a single family home and garage on the subject site. These structures will be removed. 12. The applicant proposes dividing the subject site into 20 parcels. There would be 18 single family lots, a storm drainage tract and open space tract. The storm tract would be located in the southwest corner of the subject site. The open space tract would be at the northeast corner of the entrance to the plat. 13. The proposed lots would range in size from 7,200 square feet to approximately 8,884 square feet. The Amberwood Preliminary Plat File No.:LUA00-150,PP,ECF March 5 2001 Page 4 minimum lot size permitted in the R-5 District is 7,200 square feet. 14. The storm water tract is 18,568 square feet or approximately 148 feet wide(east to west)by 126 feet deep. The entrance tract is 4,230 square feet and only 33 feet wide 15. The proposed plat would be served by both an east-west street and a jogging north-south street. The east-west street,NE 3rd Court connects to a new plat immediately to the west and would stubbed on the east but would eventually connect to any plat east of the subject site. Rosario Avenue NE would intersect with NE 4th and then jog to the west and become Rosario Place NE and end in a cul-de-sac. Proposed Lots 1 to 4 would be located on the north side of NE 3rd Court with rear yards located along NE 4th Street. Proposed Lot 16 would be located along the east margin of the site with its access via NE 3rd Court. The remaining lots would be arrayed along both sides of the cul-de-sac or access via easements from the cul-de-sac. 16. Proposed Lot 14 would be accessed across Proposed Lot 15 via an easement. Proposed Lot 12 would share an access with Proposed Lot 11. 17. Most of the vegetation from the site, including approximately 178 trees that are 8 inches or greater, would be removed to allow preparation of the building pads and the new roads. 18. The applicant proposed developing 42 foot wide streets rather than the code required 50 foot wide streets. Road dimensions are determined by the Director administratively. 19. The east-west roadway will stub at the east property line. A sign at that location about the potential roadway extension will provide information to potential residents that through-traffic might occur in that location. 20. The development of 18 single family homes will generate approximately 172 vehicle trips per day (based on approximately 9.55 trips per dwelling). It is anticipated that approximately 10%of the traffic trips will occur at each of the morning and evening peak hours. 21. The development of the subject site will generate approximately 8 or 9 school age children. These students would be spread among the different grades. The subject site is located within the Issaquah School District and School Impact Fees are required. 22. The two separate tracts are not intended to be buildable lots. One is a remainder at the entrance at NE 4th and the other will serve for storm water retention. 23. The City will provide sanitary sewer service. Domestic water will be provided by Water District 90. Assurance of domestic water should be obtained prior to recording the plat and selling individual lots. 24. The ERC imposed additional detention requirements since there are downstream problems. There will be a detention system to contain storm water and control its release rates. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proposed plat appears to serve the public use and interest. The proposed plat provides a density of 4.78 units per acre in keeping with the R-5 Zone which permits up to 5 units per acre. Amberwood Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA00-150,PP,ECF March 5 2001 Page 5 2. While the lots are larger than some newer plats due to the underlying R-5 zoning,the applicant will still be removing a substantial number of trees in order to develop the lots. These lots will provide additional housing choices in the City in an area in which urban services are available. 3. Development of the site will introduce additional noise and population. There will be additional traffic, but staff did not indicate any problems with this additional traffic. 4. The subject site is in a sensitive drainage basin and,therefore,the ERC imposed conditions to avoid exacerbating drainage problems down stream. Storm water will be contained and diverted to avoid excessive flows. 5. The applicant will be providing for future access to the east through the subject site,thereby accommodating neighboring properties. Since this potential extension of NE 3rd Place will handle through traffic in the future,the applicant shall erect a sign at the end of it informing potential residents of that possibility. 6. The plat provides reasonably rectangular lots and lots that meet the dimensional requirements of code. Access seems reasonable,although the tier of lots along the north boundary of the plat will be sandwiched between two roads with less quiet and privacy. 7. The plat shall contain language acceptable to the City Attorney regarding the fact that both Tracts are not to be developed for housing,and development of them is precluded. 8. In conclusion,the proposed preliminary plat should be approved by the City Council subject to the conditions noted below. RECOMMENDATION: The Preliminary Plat is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall comply with the conditions imposed by the ERC. 2. The plat shall contain language acceptable to the City Attorney regarding the fact that both Tracts are not to be developed for housing,and development of them is precluded. 3. A"will serve"letter must be obtained from Water District 90 prior to recording the final plat. 4. The applicant shall either draft and record a Homeowners' Association or a maintenance agreement for the maintenance of all common improvements,including private stormwater facilities,utility and other easements,and other common areas, including the tracts numbered 998 and 999. A draft of the document shall be submitted to the City of Renton Development Services Division for review and approval by the City Attorney prior to the recording of the final plat. 5. The applicant shall pay Issaquah School District Impact Fees prior to building permits. 6. Construction easements obtained from abutting property owners may be necessary prior to construction of retaining walls on or near property lines. These agreements must include protection measures for(or permission to potentially damage or remove)trees located on abutting properties within 20 feet of the property line. Amberwood Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA00-150,PP,ECF March 5 2001 Page 6 7. The applicant shall erect a sign at the stub road that clearly informs potential residents of the possibility that the road will be extended and carry additional through-traffic. ORDERED THIS 5th day of March,2001. FRED J. KAU AN HEARING E MINER TRANSMI 1'I ED THIS 5th day of March,2001 to the parties of record: Elizabeth Higgins David Cayton 1055 S Grady Way Core Design Renton,WA 98055 4205 148t Avenue NE Bellevue,WA 98007 Lafe Hermansen 3333 164'h Street SW Linwood, WA 98037 TRANSMITTED THIS 5th day of March,2001 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman,Plan/Bldg/PW Admin. Members,Renton Planning Commission Neil Watts,Development Services Director Larry Rude,Fire Marshal Sue Carlson,Econ.Dev.Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Larry Meckling,Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler South County Journal Betty Nokes,Economic Development Director Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 100Gof the City's Code,request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m.,March 19,2001. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or fact,error in judgment,or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14)days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110,which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. Amberwood Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA00-1 50,PP,ECF March 5 2001 Page 7 If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. I II I IP-1- 9 : E 128th SO NE, I 4Tit s 1 1 L„.4 - . _ CA 1 SE 132nd St. - W • , rn S] b d CV � R-8 - d N .-1 u z ( o SE 136th St. II . 0 - i 4 - S. SE 137th P1. w 1 _____!_ll SE 138th P1. j SE 138th - Srn K... E 139th P1. SE 139th —9 SE 140th P1: C� 1.0 • z : w . J cn "- EV- SE 142nd St. i ___. ---,..4 .--,.... SE 143rd SE 143rd P1, 0 0 ` U 144th .St. SE 145th P1. \\SFO 44th I . - ' `, . S Zor.l i 1 F7 ►t e��zoxn�0 tr . • • • • NW 1/4 NW f/4 SEC. 14, TWP. 29 N., ROE. IS E., W.M. • Al ¢ PI • N0I4IA1Q ONId'1If19 3} 22 ... .... • _T p In. SU f sr1Ka0LNA, • 4 ._.... 1 . N_......lira--10 K + z, —.. -- _............ .._..........._�,:.........._._..__......g .•IN IfY4Y Mr•Iy�YY - -...,...:Ylf firF OrC `:. I ,• 4011N3‘11:403AttP ■ E ..._.......T....._.....�.V............_......1.,. ..-...._.... ........ .._. r. .. /6Y01/Y AOM 1 `. y�1 �1K� ::.� F.. ; I I :. :> .�,}e To 1e,,.' a r-LL n r-- _-'T 'r:6X,'_‘.: \y_ I i 1�. • 1 1 `I OUNER/,1M'LIG,6t'1T 1 .. • Iw I '{j.n l 1 I N m l K Itt �r 11/��11=. ^i I h I •l j I .\ 1 1 rr ..1 i 4 D ND Y NANCY JONYQI 4 1 'q .I I I\Y 1 ' \ '" 1 "'t 'I •OOl if.ION NR[t �i.��I IA....•�'' t� i) 221 + i �., 1•\IiI �.1 %1� ''I,.n 1 f tiF .. s. T. Novo v e.� 37 38 .‘1. 1 4 1,4 $' 4 w 4 It d fir? , ; ! '� ML[WYODD ue `` I'` .n."" 11`••.I.:lell._.._ I v,b.4.\ r, ..... 1,P S I^! •• "fora Y"'YL�".:oi®' NI [�• 8 • I w •`I, t I'`. Q �'. N • f,e•)T10•WI00 1 • \ .i _. ;\ `i' ••I SCALE: 1 • 40 i t s ! w Y „ „ rLMNR�RYlNOINVIEWSURvt7OR `'.. L L L-✓� •�F,•J\L_ ••••1,.._.)_\Y� \I I 1• pppp M „ \ •.:le' ,, •r %\ 1:4Le ' 1 a•wTiMAvc N!;CM too 7 4 t, .\ I ,�- i.I�11 YLLJINI[.WM100TOM YO01 ,_ CONTACT.LAM IIeFI/WlN•►unr 4,r11*,^`� '\, `\lti a CT.i4• '4 \ i P i LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1 CAN,.V.00Hi, 00•4•«.wYw I, i 1 \': /-• : .....•-) . rl \ ' 1 '•I THE VAT NALP OP TN NOROWIYT OLMT[R OP T,R NOR11Y•T ;'-- .,'•. I \ eximeaR OP T M NO T 401110 R1[ JECTICSI N4,TOuNPOSP tf 1 r r--- ---\As .P`` a _'• "^I '• rcwtt, SITE STATISTICS • '•,.tNY_(r 1 sl it---�_- 'rT ,• r r •�, Arne •[toAaw ., r._.__.;y........._.._._:�.........,,,.._.6 e 'Al., K 4 IP 1 i•'w , �F r 1 1•`, EXCEPT me NOMNa PUT nwc►eCMrn[o TO RING eater SIDE"T:i,e'•wn.1.+4 ` \ I le P �^ I TOR MAD RWrW[W e7 DEW Itac0lmm UNDER Iteolmra NO. REAR.TN (t'^ L� .. `F� 9 40 h' I •.ii `. .` \ +•, AA ', 1 Yy .� ;+ eTwoO►. . TOM WIZ ANSA. to1,TN••n Mu AGNEW �J1. 4 ,lr• L_ ___4- � I., I i merOMD Mb SPINA WILY 11aTiW '�1•'1 r----'w'0•0ri f�- ^" ♦ 1 - \ 1 ` 14...14 1' �. No.A•LOTS. r. Io t•�` +�1' '� It a< -- --� \/� ' i BENCHMARK 5::V I� ,,,�, PI Y der ^ % �'``1 .):`1 'i ; MIN CH MANCE PER CT"OP 1�IV I su wer ON ww NM DA1U'I APROROW[D MINIM A o,YAC Iw,. P� 1`,._?w s' I .._ ..�1 1�'•'7��I: T l ' b &+I "NWT.1'M AA•WWIAC[DNC.M TM M N 4Tw'1T.MX n•M /TA9riaD Db1•RY.W eL/ �'. 4 �� lL-_ i,1 . • L____ „ J\. • §1 ,c,, aG.1MT OR/nIJM rRftRW/ 11 p+b lNY �, 1 I ,•.. ♦-1• -. 1 l I•,I DRAM 4RA=DISC.N TN[MAUL VEIN WT.A WTIOT AMA. MSS v.MAW OP SITE) w c r1710W•MOONla p�``I. • 411 I �'—' lfl '( l ` �I ,y i F' ., SWAN AN 1t =-.--Or41WDRO •L 4 1, \. I yi j • +' • L.MT.14 OR f4TaV FtitM/ 42 { , I r'•••w WTOR7 DROWN Y►WW Wr.(t!4 OP WIT[, L !! `. A. 1 ,ii, ,. r lir jF.,4,1 Arrla�cw.v LCUION a e0Nr0uRW � � F; �' � :I t6 , • I 14'V,45 �Lli NOr eURrerao I IvuvCi,G �D •'N 5• �' Q ALA-' . CI * t-�11ov�Si1{�.��d0 Q "J L, I I+�IFCA `�`. ii, 1 i Y ....,:„fir; :-.,I ,..__ • 7 1'rPi INEt .� ,i N ``O V i ~ I I\ Teo•.r, ,$`n�1,4R -1,4>_IL_-_... I_ I .\• \.41 Opd 't , 1 �_ 0 , Iy W��nn�� 5I-'':Ihl k cz 3 O 8 y —�--- -• .I 1�1.:sr1 1 L_k..,.�,•.J .`x`: • ffilt,?{ir'S[[W a o;r.,dm, I".'.^, iiii-a:1� ~ e W z rI�'�F----,.,IL1L.� b c-+-��---"0f----'� Rh;• ii'a 1 0 1J0 :r•-r 1,, 43 44 4., i� riP/� \, A.., i ' \ 1 FP o` \..._ r r��rc�ylp�•1+]'rr1T1� 1'I� 9 ^ W ...... , `{,l 1 FI1r,D �w I!�Y'r]�1y� �11�I7� fir . Tors ll1 �,71 '\ " 1 ' +' 1M111iR ,Y I ..(.'♦ �\ i"�IYL.UM•�II'�y,y 1qu/pC WI•fYCll!���,�, . 1.. �r,',Y.�Jd.l�.• \ r, \.. `.\iL''(11•y�. _ JF'�y \ '_'- Q r.,Yv.4S1119INNI� i WK1y� l Vim, ''�F'/l)t)„,. ir-`:, I-.0` -OTJo I.�1I1���1/1 1N1�'.II��I■ .,. ! T1•:f 14 ,'r.. '",�• r - _+- r 'N•r� W .• ~o ' • 'amm�I�L ,neom!IU '"�' 3 / �• i in.._. Y y SA•r = (..e�i"iv�PA:1��I�i�1 � R rnnezrnenrr Z r_-'+, LINT ���' ► �E..4 �'• ,,,iL x11L 1.11 1 ate'r /I/ 1 ',`w.� 1 ,j • YViYY YI®irlrl Ofll �,�•r(,WMYRJsn `. f.'\\fa'` dI III, '�{ �I M ill ® .11�11�.1!f£,.,."'II�fS: .3 eo0 l ,, w y • Y YYw4rIIIX 1.� M T. _. c � I 1 +_ _z"'+... MYYfA 45 46 ., \ \ T,oa.".. 'r .N I w p.1. \`\ I ��t'"yt�� '.'\`evil moor t,.rr` 1 '• ° I RfiN1ON 1a I1 p' �I��I �• 1 • N• `. 1 1 1 ', • I YYY�YYYVYY1YYYlYIyy •, �• 1. L_•.}_-__J L J + tL'R•1•ri1.lI,lIRRl111� AffO[ 1 I Yy —_ yI4'.7�wni.t•(:I:i^Y's1 YL'Y Y Y N ee'1e oa w `� s ®::• ' )' �RRIIIYIIIJM 7:®II �, ]2R57 \, n t. e ; µ ! : 9N,,w,.•,• it :i �c:...z pvo"n:"1, 'mrr.. Two I RW ��,. Q a s'�, �.a n Y w/nY bo,e,n O roO au,ri' \ ...r1e1Alh't=.1l_�<,::_.:_R.•,47,` .Iu• F'•r"; 47 A h8rte was YYf�1=^ :Tt.' i_I-_^aa. ,. �1 t inQ� • < li I :is Y,OY.K .ii^,r• 1� 49 50 51 52 53 • _ 1nn•rm 1 yClYl11^1T4#51440.A. ..:��f '�R,j�"�11@�fq� . sNeeT VICINITY MAP NEIGORI4O DETAIL.MAP f ® I.•1000'• ®. Hd I. O'•IOE • P•OXC,NUT. 00051 • • • NW 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC'14, TWP 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. . . �_ �.. _... _._-..._...._..... _.,._. .. ._.._..._.._......._...... 1" T—... -FIL TH �2SCALE: �I __-..•e-• '1Y MRR t.w I:I ,I. a 1 -_ .__... L ..AuT - -....... ., R -_::.... "�-"• rev T -' Sr .... �im-r:::::r..�::��. 10! - 44, ... , .,�,,;�,�, riu -i'.isYi'.i�:a .G'91>�`..... __.._: .... __.. ...T - w �--} ;y4„) r\ :t\ \ OWNER/APPLICANT FMrra J$ �'' \ 1 \ iR, `�I I 1 ` BENCHMARK DAMDaNAMOYJOHNSON Ii'2 t�' 4 I ' - 0001 N[4M STRUT O `'.�; P• \ pi \,, '\ y I < 1...4�i ,C R[N7ON,wA.1eoe1 1 ♦ . �, .�i:t \ MOM MARKS►OI WY 0/R011d1 SNAKY EN NANO f 1f1 OA1W a� \'�B �.,` 4 3 .-. •a.,,A'\ Il .1 p 44V y�h; ! A \ u rwcDD 11.0 11 \ 1 q + Ripee3•S'DRAM WMAU NCO,N 14[Mt N[IM 1T.(1.1. U131 it IIe1N I111[It Q 1 I. \\ \\�` ..,y.......,, '•1 i �i rl 'I MN 1rJ a 140M AK LC. A[NTON.NA,10001 R z \ 'I •\,h \\ `yyyy Ws •�,•i „1 [Q 404.77 OR(1x114 w[1[RI) (Se])ira0100 } {. \hir \ �� I , % 10t.1RON[N 1RAlf NR7A11 CM M NI%I7,LC MIN!T. ' ~ ,\ ♦ ..-\� 1` \ -`"" \ 1 I 1 a�eetN Apt s[. PLANNWENGINEWSURVETQR > • `, I l 1 R 647.14 OR 117.013 M17tllt ' noon OLLON ma 1.-__ t.;i 1 - \ - 1 Iv"r'"6'r�, oTRwRMN LOCATION Or COMMAS • tom ChOEt)K N.0 M1[300 I'. D • 'TOT. $ _.•.•••. 07JA NAfmNOTDN+000I M OAVO CAMP(-NON, 0 Ttri 711 A► '4 \ , 1 1 •,'\ wN VANO TN-Sun+pr „S : \ z --- 'r••• - \s. ii a • . e e; SITE STATISTICS z • t.i IUDz z ` N.....+'\ Ij " S \ r\ ♦ �t�d' I —Ira' 1 ' MG D101VI10m MIROR 4.7 AMU ... .... V I III I e `1y.39 M1O •'....., 11 I\ t;1e1 \(' AvveOR a n1RDR _R R `\ ` '1 : j 1 eOY•E fR Cave u peRROA[7 OM•i(WM srmrrm0 7.ea0 O.r. • \`\ „D\ -. 1IIIIi I I'\ _ . i TYPICAL ON-SITE ROAD SECl/ON M\EXCAVATOR 4,000 CT, I . IMeANNNEIIT 6000 ar. 1 I ! L± •u3.i :-- '11 1 tJj{ 1 II 14 IWL.. - VOW°MAO —400—RROR06W CONTdIR 4[YA710N 2 Li 1 •Y I '' I ,rl 1 �s+41re... -. lR,t ' ' I ... I 0 , OHNrAtAVArr PIN AM DMRO[R 9U--METRO DONTOYIt f1lvAwaN 1.) J p, �, h �7'' 1 ARCA IV ANONor A IcgANr ATD-L1lt a•COW RNtlKrr 90'rlMu RDDNar (\r y�j y} \ \ Ili I�1.-..IL;V�:s::I I •: \ t, wwnr CQ7DtfR 11RDOA(CUR* n''macpi BR `\ -'e0' M I If I 1 \ '\ 1\. t2�•••..,•L IMAM As1 -ARV WM* - (' —�— 1 1 NE. 41H ST. HALF-STREET IMPROVEMENTS k Lk, OMB :'4• ,.. 11) .$) Il. ..'''.: '.:2,1\, N\ t . . \ • . . pp S -v- ► •7._='':� 'fir\r►`,'�►.+4,.•.' / '•-- \ `\ -... W�YMWWIIWIIiA- C•m7�fi f�`'/yAvi[�� y ��'�►` .�. • en J 1 1 "" 1 A• to, 41 n\, eY 1; e \•�. ox a ca,i.- • „...1 v-.. n'i[i "` \ a 4% 4� L I , \ ✓A\ , • ,, , ; \ 11 ._......-� 149 5D 7 1 •,51.'` 1 • rcT- or •7 11 ') , 1 1 • . I 00059°rn. P, 23 N., RGE. 5 ., W. M. SCALE: 1 " = 40' 0 20 40 80 LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE NORTH 42 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 5190506. • '„ x. ''....,-... ". .. ,.,cs.,"`_,.%-,.," .n-..M c .- :.,.�--r _..+.•_.r, CITY 'IF RENTON oil A N.. City Clerk Jesse Tanner,Mayor Marilyn J.Petersen July 24, 2001 Steven Beck Amberwood LLC 19129 SE 145th Street . Renton, WA 98059 Re: Amberwood Preliminary Plat; File No. PP-00-150 Dear Mr. Beck: At the regular Council meeting of July 23, 2001, the Renton City Council approved the referenced preliminary plat subject to the conditions outlined in the hearing examiner's recommendation, dated March 5,2001. Pursuant to RCW, a final plat meeting all requirements of State law and Renton Municipal Code shall be submitted to the City for approval within five years of the date of preliminary plat.,approval. If I can provide additional information or assistance,please feel free to call. Sincerely, Marilyn . t sen . City Clerk/Cable Manager cc: Mayor Jesse Tanner Council President Dan Clawson . Elizabeth Higgins, Development Services Division Fred Kaufman,Hearing Examiner 1901, 2001 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425) 430-6510 /FAX (425) 430-6516 ` ,: • :.� This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer '441--eD33- CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI #: g.iii • SUBMITTING DATA: FOR AGENDA OF: Dept/Div/Board.. HEARING EXAMINER —a'3—DI Staff Contact... Fred J. Kaufman, ext. 6515 AGENDA STATUS: Consent XX SUBJECT: Public Hearing.. Amberwood Preliminary Plat Correspondence.. File No. LUA00-050,PP,ECF Ordinance Resolution Old Business.... EXHIBITS: New Business.... Study Session... Hearing Examiner's Report and Recommendation Other RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPROVALS: Legal Dept Council Concur Finance Dept.... Other FISCAL IMPACT: N/A Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.. Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated... SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Hearing Examiner's Report and Recommendation on Amberwood Preliminary Plat was published on March 5,2001. There were no requests for reconsideration and the appeal period ended on March 19, 2001. The Examiner recommends approval of the proposed preliminary plat, subject to the conditions outlined on pages 5 and 6 of the Examiner's Report and Recommendation. This office notes that the conditions placed on this project are to be met at later stages of the platting process. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Amberwood Preliminary Plat. , March 5, 2001 OFFICE OF I'HE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION APPLICANT: Steven Beck Amberwood LLC 10129 SE 145th Street File No.: LUA00-150,PP, ECF LOCATION: The project is located on NE 4th Street,at Rosario Avenue NE in northeast Renton SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Subdivide an approximately 4.63 acre property into 18 lots suitable for detached, single family houses SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on January 31,2001. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application,field checking the property and surrounding area;the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the February 6, 2001 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday,February 6,2001, at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Preliminary Plat application,proof of posting,proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: Boundary and Topographic Survey Exhibit No.4: Preliminary Utility,Grading, Elevation &Drainage Plan Exhibit No. 5: Tree Cutting and Clearing Plan Exhibit No.6: Zoning Map The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner,Development Services,City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way,Renton, Washington 98055. The area of the proposed development is currently undergoing a great deal of transition,and has been recently annexed into the City of • Amberwood Preliminary Pia. - File No.: LUA00-150,PP,ECF March 5 2001 Page 2 Renton. The applicant has proposed subdivision of an approximately 201,755 sf property into 18 lots suitable for detached, single family houses. The lots would range in size from 7,200 sf to 8,884 sf. The property is zoned R-5,which allows a maximum of five dwelling units per net acre. Approximately 37,669 sf of the site, 18.6 percent,would be streets. This is a higher percentage than typical in a residential plat,partially due to the lack of development of streets in the area. The Examiner asked why the Environmental Review Committee(ERC)imposed the more stringent stormwater standards,if there are no critical areas on the property. Ms.Higgins replied that the area of the Highlands has experienced a great deal of problems with surface water runoff,partially due to Maplewood Creek. The City is also imposing the more recent, stricter King County drainage standards in this area, so that greater retention can be accommodated on properties. There are no wetlands on the property, but the general concern in this area has caused the City to impose the newer King County standards. The applicant has requested a modification from the City of Renton Street Standards,which would allow the public right-of-way to be narrowed from 50 feet to 42 feet. That modification request has been approved. The existing structures on the site would be removed,and approximately 7,500 cubic yards of fill would be re- graded on the site. The ERC issued a Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated. The mitigation measures include quite a few that relate to stormwater control and the prevention of erosion during the construction of the project. Additional mitigation measures include Transportation,Fire and Parks mitigation fees, and the recommendation that the geotechnical report be followed during design and construction. Ms.Higgins reviewed the project's consistency with Preliminary Plat Criteria. The project proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan land use designation of Residential Rural. It does not endanger any environmentally sensitive areas. The land is going to be developed into large lots,which is consistent with the transition area of the City. One of the policies of the Residential Rural plan is that development densities be a maximum of five homes for every net acre. The project is also consistent with the Transportation Element and the Environmental Element of the Comprehensive Plan. The underlying zoning designation complies with all the requirements of the R-5 development standards. The minimum lot size is 7,200 sf,with some lots quite a bit larger. The lots all exceed the lot depth and meet the lot width requirements. The lot arrangement is logical, with lot lines at right angles to the street. Each lot has access to a public street or road,with Lots 11, 12, 14 being accessed by easements. Access to the project would be primarily from NE 4th Street via the new road, Rosario Avenue NE, which would extend,offset from NE 3rd Street, into a cul-de-sac. Because the area has been annexed,the City is prepared to provide all services,with two exceptions. Water is proved by Water District 90. The applicant will be required to obtain a"will serve"letter from Water District 90. The property lies within the Issaquah School District, and is therefore subject to school impact fees. Staff recommends approval of the project, subject to the following conditions: (1)compliance with the ERC mitigation measures,(2)a"will serve"letter must be obtained from Water District 90 prior to obtaining building permits, (3)the applicant shall either draft and record a Homeowners' Association or a maintenance agreement for the maintenance of all common improvements,(4)the applicant shall spay Issaquah School District impact Fees prior to building permits,(5)the applicant shall post a sign on NE 3` Court at the east property boundary stating that the street is subject to future extension, and(5)construction easements obtained from abutting property owners may be necessary prior to construction of retaining walls on or near property lines. Lafe Hermansen, 3333 164th Street SW,Linwood,WA 98037 stated that he is the planner for the applicant. The applicant is in agreement with the staff report,and Mr. Hermansen is present to answer any questions. The Examiner asked for clarification of the construction easements on the property. Amberwood Preliminary P1ar- File No.: LUA00-150,PP,ECF March 5 2001 Page 3 David Cayton,Core Design,4205 148th Avenue NE,Bellevue,WA 98007 said that no retaining walls are planned for the southwest area of the property. Mr.Cayton stated he is also the engineer for the Maplewood project. Grading can be designed so that both the rear of the lots of Maplewood and the rear of the lots at Amberwood can be benefited by making a smoother transition between plats. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak,and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 9:26 a.m. FINDINGS,CONCLUSIONS&RECOMMENDATION Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Steven Beck, filed a request for approval of an 18-lot Preliminary Plat together with two tracts. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M)for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located on the south side of NE 4th Street between Lyons Avenue SE(146th Avenue SE in King County)on the west and Rosario Avenue SE(152nd Avenue SE in King County)on the east. NE 4th Street is SE 128th in King County. The subject site is on the eastern edge of the Highlands area of the City. 6. The subject site is approximately 4.63 acres in area. The parcel is rectangular. The subject site is approximately 615.62 feet long(north to south)by approximately 327 feet wide. 7. The subject site slopes approximately 6 percent or approximately 42 feet from the northeast corner to the southwest corner. 8. The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 4760 enacted in April 1999. 9. The subject site is currently zoned R-5 (Single Family- 5 dwelling units/acre). 10. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of single family uses at a rural density. 11. There is a single family home and garage on the subject site. These structures will be removed. 12. The applicant proposes dividing the subject site into 20 parcels. There would be 18 single family lots, a storm drainage tract and open space tract. The storm tract would be located in the southwest corner of the subject site. The open space tract would be at the northeast corner of the entrance to the plat. 13. The proposed lots would range in size from 7,200 square feet to approximately 8,884 square feet. The Amberwood Preliminary Plat File No.:LUA00-150,PP,ECF March 5 2001 Page 4 minimum lot size permitted in the R-5 District is 7,200 square feet. 14. The storm water tract is 18,568 square feet or approximately 148 feet wide(east to west)by 126 feet deep. The entrance tract is 4,230 square feet and only 33 feet wide 15. The proposed plat would be served by both an east-west street and a jogging north-south street. The east-west street,NE 3rd Court connects to a new plat immediately to the west and would stubbed on the east but would eventually connect to any plat east of the subject site. Rosario Avenue NE would intersect with NE 4th and then jog to the west and become Rosario Place NE and end in a cul-de-sac. Proposed Lots 1 to 4 would be located on the north side of NE 3rd Court with rear yards located along NE 4th Street. Proposed Lot 16 would be located along the east margin of the site with its access via NE 3rd Court. The remaining lots would be arrayed along both sides of the cul-de-sac or access via easements from the cul-de-sac. 16. Proposed Lot 14 would be accessed across Proposed Lot 15 via an easement. Proposed Lot 12 would share an access with Proposed Lot 11. 17. Most of the vegetation from the site, including approximately 178 trees that are 8 inches or greater, would be removed to allow preparation of the building pads and the new roads. 18. The applicant proposed developing 42 foot wide streets rather than the code required 50 foot wide streets. Road dimensions are determined by the Director administratively. 19. The east-west roadway will stub at the east property line. A sign at that location about the potential roadway extension will provide information to potential residents that through-traffic might occur in that location. 20. The development of 18 single family homes will generate approximately 172 vehicle trips per day (based on approximately 9.55 trips per dwelling). It is anticipated that approximately 10%of the traffic trips will occur at each of the morning and evening peak hours. 21. The development of the subject site will generate approximately 8 or 9 school age children. These students would be spread among the different grades. The subject site is located within the Issaquah School District and School Impact Fees are required. 22. The two separate tracts are not intended to be buildable lots. One is a remainder at the entrance at NE 4th and the other will serve for storm water retention. 23. The City will provide sanitary sewer service. Domestic water will be provided by Water District 90. Assurance of domestic water should be obtained prior to recording the plat and selling individual lots. 24. The ERC imposed additional detention requirements since there are downstream problems. There will be a detention system to contain storm water and control its release rates. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proposed plat appears to serve the public use and interest. The proposed plat provides a density of 4.78 units per acre in keeping with the R-5 Zone which permits up to 5 units per acre. • Amberwood Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA00-150,PP,ECF March 5 2001 Page 5 2. While the lots are larger than some newer plats due to the underlying R-5 zoning,the applicant will still be removing a substantial number of trees in order to develop the lots. These lots will provide additional housing choices in the City in an area in which urban services are available. 3. Development of the site will introduce additional noise and population. There will be additional traffic, but staff did not indicate any problems with this additional traffic. 4. The subject site is in a sensitive drainage basin and,therefore,the ERC imposed conditions to avoid exacerbating drainage problems down stream. Storm water will be contained and diverted to avoid excessive flows. 5. The applicant will be providing for future access to the east through the subject site,thereby accommodating neighboring properties. Since this potential extension of NE 3rd Place will handle through traffic in the future,the applicant shall erect a sign at the end of it informing potential residents of that possibility. 6. The plat provides reasonably rectangular lots and lots that meet the dimensional requirements of code. Access seems reasonable,although the tier of lots along the north boundary of the plat will be sandwiched between two roads with less quiet and privacy. 7. The plat shall contain language acceptable to the City Attorney regarding the fact that both Tracts are not to be developed for housing,and development of them is precluded. 8. In conclusion,the proposed preliminary plat should be approved by the City Council subject to the conditions noted below. RECOMMENDATION: The Preliminary Plat is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall comply with the conditions imposed by the ERC. 2. The plat shall contain language acceptable to the City Attorney regarding the fact that both Tracts are not to be developed for housing,and development of them is precluded. 3. A"will serve"letter must be obtained from Water District 90 prior to recording the final plat. 4. The applicant shall either draft and record a Homeowners' Association or a maintenance agreement for the maintenance of all common improvements, including private stormwater facilities,utility and other easements, and other common areas, including the tracts numbered 998 and 999. A draft of the document shall be submitted to the City of Renton Development Services Division for review and approval by the City Attorney prior to the recording of the final plat. 5. The applicant shall pay Issaquah School District Impact Fees prior to building permits. 6. Construction easements obtained from abutting property owners may be necessary prior to construction of retaining walls on or near property lines. These agreements must include protection measures for(or permission to potentially damage or remove)trees located on abutting properties within 20 feet of the property line. • Amberwood Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA00-150,PP,ECF March 5 2001 Page 6 7. The applicant shall erect a sign at the stub road that clearly informs potential residents of the possibility that the road will be extended and carry additional through-traffic. ORDERED THIS 5th day of March,2001. V....Cu_. ...�� 0, FRED J. KAU AN HEARING E MINER 1RANSMI FI'bD THIS 5th day of March,2001 to the parties of record: Elizabeth Higgins David Cayton 1055 S Grady Way Core Design Renton,WA 98055 4205 148t Avenue NE Bellevue, WA 98007 Lafe Hermansen 3333 164`h Street SW Linwood,WA 98037 TRANSMITTED THIS 5th day of March,2001 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman,Plan/Bldg/PW Admin. Members,Renton Planning Commission Neil Watts,Development Services Director Larry Rude,Fire Marshal Sue Carlson,Econ.Dev.Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Larry Meckling,Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler South County Journal Betty Nokes,Economic Development Director Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 100Gof the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m.,March 19,2001. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact,error in judgment,or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14)days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110,which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. • Amberwood Preliminary Pla File No.: LUA00-150,PP,ECF March 5 2001 Page 7 If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. ,., I . - 1 iP-I - 9 : tE 128th SO N 4114 sT **17- ,--i---e___ Irg- ., . .. 1 • - 41- - -. --, : - R5. IL. SE 132nd St.. - - -i . . ' . - -w Si -c4 C/2 'Id Cli 0 l.0 • • rT-1 " R-8 It - vk pz - LCD . U 1 • J 0 SE 136th St. i. ..... Z 0 . - . . : - . 1 . - - . - SE •137th Pl. ' ;L. 1 _ , TT SE 138th P1. f • -. SE 138th . D . var4 139th Pl. i -6 - .- [SE 139th • - 9 SE 140th Pl: .4 Lpto . 1. . • 0 . fr./ j .._; ; SE 142nd St. .j...}, . • ,________, • le'. •4 .4 :SE 143rd co 0) • -4. -44 I S214_. d Pl, il 0 144th-: St. SE 145th Pl. Vd44th If - - 1 —1 ,-------,(.........___S sL.0 . --- . 1.:, itli, r-N ... .gt ,sarr.- F7 ZONING . ...... .. pi,44--F' 1D000 WOO•J . 000l•a IpN 10`tld dD'W 1Id'1HIO GOOHd09HVI3N dt1'W.IlINIOh ED 173M5 yI' YYYY ,• i.t.Y av�„W� cdJ )5' 06 617 Vkii • w,,,. - th j ;p.cr• _ E _...___-_.__._._..__ .Sa9LGN.1 ai�YaiZ.wn 5n�::..n.;'.gli :eM)r H-e -_ _._ [S'4Z[ w _ I mp IYYYYYYYYY,'yv��%:id<i:.:•-, IIAII•F�' • �_)I111nMnln.{�,�ntdi.•r�Yw`r-_)YY ` ������fff r� ° � >� M M• , lam='n�t`YYYYLY'11',1:..1 JY:�la:.°.�j�I®� I I .. ,' `' �', M;�.iln°nnn�nnnnnn nMbnenA - Iann1 I 1 r --__ /�I`f LL I•,I. Y.-._ • itt • IV.w n i i i i `\V� -,� � f aY p a f�q MI�� �i ii ��� �1. © N O l N 9 y i I I 1 w n.w�\,S;b �.._... qq ilwwarrw f.'w" • 1'e' �L�li��Il�t v.uw.e I e$ .i.-1.-,.....' I aowu Ywiiwn \ 9.�' $t• )a�4 °„11Y ^71 Ml•i:tmitine,i'• a Ln ♦ . `` j �mn4'L ✓'L b VAJ.2 ` � . r>oen� f £ 'Ise MOW ,eye I 5 + ) _ Mt1Y.ln11CtI sYsP• �r anpt7lq'�p®fit iYYY 7•.�} j '// :•� .7Y11[IN[YY[l'[lia�'d R .��,IF�:�Y.L_t iaYri4i • 'Y' I, -� J� .; 7444 '�1 y Y� �C�, % fA l�� iiy.l..�.♦ru.I'y��1�1I�YIi1f�Ii. r-- -__-ti''y-i7� ` e � 1♦�. 'I ,1JiA� aU iFrL■it a i.�[lni�il'J - ' .,�.`dp`i v:1in I' 1<,< ,"'•� •`, `,r`\ua `,�i'`• ‘4:t�, •_ y Est°- �ui;-stir -` AN \ I ._. tv,_-..--� f�L �, `I aS�, b� £fT S1 -Y rl c�t.. h,-�.:1L7t 11�t`411111 • "R'Jai .: A'�. 1 r.�.- ♦n:r: , a"j!�ta- _--_Z_-I i a Iiit;;I3i i7_�i g�lr pa I If..1O `• 1 i In ;:.-Y a4 i,J a1r \Y•na \I y n 0 r w ...,:oil _ �.• 143, p.' •--••\ 14I,As•,,14 <? 1 !!w I,ti'I',^---T•i•'iF : 0I I �, n a Z nga-lall"In }}.YY��5�5745.. ' n f I yr...I "..14 �1 ` +, I� a _6:,ir:a,11 I Oi1NYM10N "iy yS y�! y1 I: _�T ti wY+ou+0�ro enures S urlaaa♦1yr „; J 'I ,�1 —,, ,€ Sy i -1--�► r.:I �O1 I `,1' w,eoa 11, fiLO YO yr♦/Yi..f♦I i0rNWaLYolr •''�"I i ! •' -.. ',,N, ,� ! I L rwMMI L10LtU NO K'W 11 �fT,,�p,'�y!`,' I }J I '� L l I l'b (iLt o y1♦Il v.Nllr �1•M'1aY11r 01 r'N ML.O T 9N YLL N'OOWa!7V. 4'MOO IY 11•/11741141•61.10 TO iatJJ 1 I �It"y.-�t4'' I-r.�^ 1L�o ---J , I h.I • 1•.� 114 awrot wuoo0ITI 19 ,`4 19. r♦Niu11 N�.IN N0 LL•hr 7i + ''•o♦----- 7.i r N1M1 r rN ,y1 ,,.ti_J,,-:4-- +."d°' j •• -'•-_y:ro..._ y 1 . WM0♦•/11000 O�L1�1 N11u T,19 M P LN'W 1fLL N'rla IMAM«avow A•LRn.l0 1 i 1 IV.a)C y�y1..,y�,;•�`m "�j'1yi ��__ y •�•j I arm,♦Lr.1uR00 0110ro♦N I4LLYO NV aArN/n 1iNOM r01,t®I JO 1110 Nil TAW k7Naa ••• I,1 ¢'',\•:._1 J '\.� 'L I J 11 Yy' nv.♦rI1 •c"L°' rypi 'Jd!^INON3A +I ,�itt• ':n`t�' ti'�� �' I'. a � 3 i t ' .Y, i, Oe N101m OM ! ! �71� 61 \ I \ \ i J 4.1 •iT 1 \ .LION 111FNY Irani 91O 03110014110 "j 1 ;__� _- It _--- ... \ J NO I.r!Y..06101 7iYr LI 14101 YOYOYN ..••••.._l,; �Y tl,��i• •b.,r �.u� -1 `.1J � , }`, 1 ' ,Q, ! `. n i7`- 111 1 „soi 0 62 A•WOW 'O/1410100111111101111 07®I03OI 011010♦WD.�YN Ord NW I M Q �1 2 �J�+) 1 I r,J1 JrI11r♦A'.♦• iON JJNI00 pay 01 01NND0 i7W1fLL 1W Cr N1NON OLL L WO `I r1 ..1•1N:1W yawmio i I d,ll t. J'KJ J .i• ,al I�,V' a 1�. d ,a�i Z 1101p@M1111 ` I y 1 ` \"�•< I I I S V I LSI lb'1S 3119 'J1M00 way N'NnaINa1 iLL7HIT1Yn'lrri♦iw1rY110.104 ` --_ J `�c__=----1:r I. I,_ ---J SJ''"�" _. rt JIM•Nr01'N NCWM 10 YL114101.tR0YR1011 AO Ni1yRD 4" '� ^b• \ • ,` �\�-_-iw ! 1.i01WON 2M110 Y1N1ri01rrOWIOl WA110 YT•M1.,7>W \ •,IJ \. 1.d.ro ac�ou«�taNNvral N011dl?J7S3Q '1dV 1 i�yl ! �' \ `,;t0}.li sc. .1r � ':4� I •f a +w nt,440 01111i111011.101 r / OI i y `,` ',1 \ �•�\ ''•i,.�`;-g g'Y 9a{ - aoc WM T/9•tMUiI Wn Y'a ,'\ Ya ., ,j4,'. 1 �.' •TU Na.so aa9 ® •I � Y.1'a4 Xi. ••-•�- 1 r11�'I..Ra�-1 w ;�F o♦.7' 1. - ,Yt . - iiOJ.iLtll(W/i183NIONa�iINNd� Yr ar u A I V{i^ I 1 1 ,'.1 `tom__, -_I I 1Y 1 , oar•oLi MO rot - ;,l :31b'OS I > , 114• I,\ \-1` r 1,',` I 1�Yli♦lwi w.�rS at i YI ;'I ., .1,I.: 11 \•i•ir: 1 _-v-F:aor. 1,y.,Y{y`•I >+Tt aoa rioav S 1 w ci i q Z '\k6. t {S{ ,•elf t3£ L£ , ,Tr trail.PUP a�+ao. •,I ," \jf 71 Q'` Y�gl�l i` I��\ P ` fr ,1 ;i' r.� /3 •J �r Wawa 10MNr MaraVENN \ S�I I ay1: `\ 1 \\ 1-i n�I < \1 I I " 1 �� J 11•4=17d.1r/d3N110 y' �� y I _ ,._ _ --- _ J 11 II I, I II OY.i/1 OWW d I ' ��j................—.:>'.'l:':�•1ea:,rori�I7;nic,.n1 Cl � °1 ~ J VSNOJ Y .'•. ._...-r_.............,.�,....r�,,................_.._._. �.-ol. ..... ,mu..u,.. �..__.�. _....:bL:E&C:- - �. � I , __ ice,iI�CITY OpF�PIFNTON YYYY, • 1 • ._._�1. .., .... ... r�ox +'::'.::;��„�: =:i •:::.��{f--�,�� `-c •.....:, ■ ,1 WY, P; �� •HiN ai. 'Y YiJi.O 1YN. •-__•� ..._ _. _. a_[n'•rF LIJT!WI_Y .. o,_,,._ _' -b...._ :.... 1 q 7 11 N arl`I L•SLai MR...11.,1W M 1�- ' - _ 3_N__.._.._._......__._...._...._..._._....-_-----__......_ N 3 2001 _,. r_._ _.._._...._ .... ,,..- .............-..._...__- .1Y� BUILDING DIVISION a 7YiN '3 9 30b "N 67 dMl 'N J3S %/; MN t4 MN •. • _ . NW 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP 23 N., RGE, 5 E., NW. .• .," 1 , * , --- -.77.,•=.777-. * --, '"'r;•••-.---"-"---.,.----, --------,•-•---• - - 4. • • SCALE: 1" .. 40' --. ••• ." ---2---"---7-----,- -N t.•471,1•-sr--- , r no UM 11/01 f 3 pk= z1.......... ..4...4 .., .......—, .-4. 4.4,. ' me... ......44.4.....4........r.,. ...-. , 71.N ..... ::‘..- , ---- -..-- - - -sir zEtl,, .L ... I. .11...• ..••••-..;Ziiiisr-Wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiilieiiiiiii,g4iiiiii-.. 0..•--eo•-•••••• •- • ..:-.:.....`.:-'5•.•5;tr 11 . OiNERAPPLICANT a 41.4.S•X. Wi.``14114 im—P.E7--) \ TI iw -I !J .„1, i \ DAMS b NANCY MINION •Py 0,14,...„11 ., 1" .--•N ,\2 .‘,.\","\\\\I:\ .......i,.3.: .•-•• 1\'•\4'.:14.!k:k11\:\ ''''`\41\ .\\'''' '11 'it'rl P.'iA.1 '‘. \'''' BENCHMARK BOO1 NE 4T4 STREET RENToN,II&Mil .,...ve 1 APPUOMIt I.10,..,. ANBEAR000 LLC \38 %,kl,4 ' ,OTEN:::M;P.ER.C1.7:.:ARaINTORma.fAIR;r7Tht,6,1.4T.RA:4,411111.1t0A0TRIL 44122 SE 145T1 SIMEt '3 n 2 RENTON,WA.HOBS I120TH ST.)4 148111 ANS ILL .... ss EC.434.77 OR(124.114 MERRS) 423)770-0100 1 . 1 '.... . \4 "••‘,.". ..,...,. .... 1 ; .,•,, ,t,;, .. .. ,I., 2111 , I , ! wirglaftER BRASS SURFACE TIM IN THE int ILL 121144 ST. PLANNERM4VINEERAURVEVOR ' c\ .•• .. \ \ \.P' • ' t ' 13..047.14 OR 4117.013 lit7ERS) AWN P-9Talil'Att.ILL,Milt 200 4 .4 . i-e ... \. \ Saik . • Nr1,,,Ns............ III i; -..fee \ Altair SC ----- APPROXIMATE LOCATION DT CONTOURS RvE1t0 • . \ NIES MEL s',.--- .. .4•' ' 441.4.44:11941g.' ' — 411 \.. . ROTSu .00E1.1.2Nev.aitrifOrANN itN200.7,:rit li 1, 1 • 4 lit S••-' ,44' ., k \ \. I '. .\ VIM, ... PA, 4.1. 0,4r SITE STATISTICS ..,. "., _„-•....s.'•, -••' • ? \ • •-,11 'rt --•••-•-....._"--- •• r ir Iv z ` ..-- 4, •-,'• -s---n- i• . .' ' ... , 1,1 ---\------ , • • ,•"J \s ,,,, 1 10' re li . \ \-) , . \ . s......, -11-cs. I +a r 1 4, AREA DIRIVIROLD APPROX.4.7 ACRES 41 4) \ `,..te\ \ 1.t..... i,.. 1'\;........ .. APPROX.[ARTWORK M ! , \ 'TeX MAW CATHY COYCWIT STRIPPINO 7.600 C.V. KRI1CAL WA*•°VIM \ '', I. I i \ COMM foOtwAtX 000 C.V. \ \ i n II 1 .'0„ EXCAVATOR 2, \ \ ' ''.\ 01111.1°' 7 ' - \ 11-i • TYPICAL ON-SI7E ROAD SEC770N EM$ANXWENT 4.000 LT. V tl . _ .., , ,, ,.\ , 1 a - NO SCAtX !Ili '•‘•"'i:..7':\\\ . ...4;:.... 1. '""\''.....•............. \ . P. ''"":4”-I'l'-- .1 ` . •. , .,...... ......... 4 , __ .,,,_ \ ., 2,, . • ,___:____. .:11•:, Iii::-.7-...7,:-;:z..T.....\-,1 iqk ;k LEGEND L.: "- . At .. ' 1 • f ''''' tlINCIIPAL AL ROM • I Vr 4r g EIRE ISYDRAIIT VI Z 17.1:- 1 '1 i d ,-'..r...-• •.. 10 NON ' fESIPea COredlli 5' '14Z 0,13,7A"rwt ...... .:1,7.........T4TATERAK,U111.1m017 vmsn. -N41 1 11 t42 ‘•,.w \f..... ,1/41\1114,c',L1....}To,,iiii • ,. 4 WPM • '-' 'I 4. _I •1 : ii \ ::: .----.... ,..., 113" • 1-112- .,.. POO Wit OftlaY CRAM •I ---,JO—STORM MARIAM UMW ...., „ •4.,•,...4"..4: .".:,-MINO exam -00—PROPOSED CONTOuR ELEVATION 1., •... -4,40—SlarTIN2 CoNT04.01 ELIIIATION 3'CEMENT COVCAfff 90tWALP COM ROCKERY (.1.THAN Pe MAW/2 . 4.INICV 141.127R4144r) CZI V ' \ \ I . ' It/ ""'... AREMfnaD'A Mcc.wPROWTNOtr:wwirSt:EASSZIWCW'Rwtpv.WOL-RAJEcm 44.0 MITER C.)'I 11121KW A-A NE. 4711 sr. HALF-S17?EET IMPROVEMENTS =•': rE,4,, \,. • •—....:.,,, MO=AIL .1' t •:.,.... LS LS F,., ''.-•!,... ) .1 44"1"". ...\*.',1\\ \\ ( • • . • 1,\All 4."-1.--''' • . . , \ ... 4 • ,.. el "' '...,. ,)•!.../".' A.. - ••••.., ' . ., ....—• . A• . \ - MI A . lto.. - •• - .7-7:-Q. ,,. . . . . .....•... ..,,.‘ ' N. r ,,,,..,- tr-, . .1'.-' . • ..,,, / , . ,...ss,.......... .., •\\•,,ntiv .1, J i r ei,?.. tis„, ,,, • ., •..,‘,3,....••• OK . I908 ;I. ' .Z!..T.Fl( .N, •••, • "P •, ',... , .., tl. 6 1 Ir. li ....., . 4 446,..... • '— s-1.(,.... \-----e—......\: _ ". ;;.,...., ..s . . - .i• . .. ,•••i oz,, ,,,,• --\•11:72b.w.,.._-_.tte=2.2 1 s . \ •wps..• ,... •-,..-:4•1•,•••••••-.\ •i•• ••••,,, •.\ ...,in.KIWI ....,..., \ . 47 . —.11i.--1 1 "i \ \ \ , % 'N \ .... • k 0, ‘. i S.EET OE-' i' tI Fa' i ... ''. I 49 .) Bo\N' \\'51„ \52''•, __,,....53"--"V \ .1 . 1, 1 00059 . . \ .1 \ ......m.....-- . :7•.6.'-=::: • . . l,J I 1 1 1 . rp, 23 N. RGE, W,M. j N SCALE: 1 " = 40' 0 20 40 80 LEGAL DESCRIi= -10N THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTI4UJEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE NORTH 42 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 5190506. ''":.-.A-aa,.,.r»-.-r '.' =. •s:.,-. . tea 1_. �:,._...r. _�w '"" _r-. 2w1^">':.tf aN; ;. : _ .:.a -.e.:•`.r-- - _al,.._�,..`>c: .w>...__ .,r...:.�: -r-. .ai'F:. • CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: July 10, 2001 TO: Kelly Williams, Hearing Examiner's Office FROM: Elizabeth Higgins, AICP SUBJECT: Amberwood Legal Description LU oo -A-So Attached you will find the revised legal description for the Amberwood Preliminary Plat. This may have been provided earlier. If the Plat has not been to Council yet, it should now be ready to go. Please let me know if not. Thank you. _. CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: March 23,2001 TO: Joan Thompson FROM: Sonja J.Fesser SUBJECT: Amberwood Preliminary Plat,LUA-00-150 Legal Description Review Bob Mac Onie and I have reviewed the above referenced legal description and find it to be satisfactory,except that the City of Renton should be included in the indexing portion of the legal description. See the attachment. 3/ z6/6/ \H:\FILE.SYS\LND\20\AMBRW OD2.doc E„-co-., CIT' JF RENTON .iPlannin /Buildin /Public Works Department .�_ g g Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator March 27, 2001 Mr. Steven Beck Amberwood LLC 19129 SE 145th Street Renton, WA 98059 SUBJECT: Amberwood Preliminary Plat, Project No. LUA-00-150, PP, ECF Legal Description Correction Dear Mr. Beck: This letter is sent to advise you that the Hearing Examiner's office has requested that a correction be made to the legal description of the above referenced project. The City of Renton should be included in the indexing portion of the legal description. See attachment. Please submit a copy of the preliminary plat plan with the corrected legal description to my attention. Sincerely, Elizabeth Higgins, AICP Senior Planner Enclosure Copy: file 9� ^'trdo^ 1901 2001 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 :: This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer ., • LEGAL DESCRIFTION TI4E EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF TIC NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST OF.SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,_RANGE S EAST, WILLAMETtE MERIDIAN, IN KING: COUNTY, WASHINGTON' EXCEPT THE NORTH 42 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 51$0506,. 41,1 CITY )F RENTON ..itt Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator March 20, 2001 Mr. Steven Beck Amberwood LLC 19129 SE 145th Street Renton, WA 98059 SUBJECT: Amberwood Preliminary Plat, Project No. LUA-00-150, PP, ECF Dear Mr. Beck: This letter is written to provide additional information about the question you raised regarding the future developability of Tract 999 at the Amberwood plat. Because the stormwater tract will remain undeveloped due to its function, my suggestion is to record the limitation on development of Tract 998 on the face of the plat, thereby meeting the Hearing Examiner's condition#2 regarding that tract. Because the limitation on development of Tract 999 is temporary in nature, however, a covenant between the property owner and the City of Renton could be recorded to meet condition#2 in regards to Tract 999. In the covenant, state that the tract will not be developed, unless the opportunity arises in the future to make it a conforming lot. At the time the lot can be developed, the covenant can be removed. The language for both these actions would have to be reviewed by the City attorney, as usual, prior to recording. Also, the Office of the Hearing Examiner has informed me that they sent you, and the property owners, a copy of the Hearing Examiner decision. It you still have not received a copy, and need one, please contact their office at 425-430-6515. Sincerely, Elizabeth Higgins,AICP Senior Planner Copy: file 1901 2001 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 •� �.� This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer �", atk a. ^' • crryiroF RENTON .,u. Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator March 19, 2001 Mr. Steven Beck • Amberwood LLC 19129 SE 145th Street Renton, WA 98059. . SUBJECT: Amberwood'Preliminary Plat, Project No. LUA-00-150, PP, ECF Dear Mr. Beck: This letter is sent at your request to clarify the intent of the Hearing Examiner's,condition regarding the"non-residential tracts." Tract 998, in the southwest corner Of the property, is the stormwater tract and is intended to be'lused;;exclusively, for the on-site stormwater detention and water quality control system:.. Tract 999, located near the entrance to:the development, iftthe northeast corner of the property, is at this time below the,minimum standards for a residential lot in the Residential 5 Zone. Also,,the density of the project with 18 lots is.4;78 du/a. A development of 19 lots-would increase the.density,of the project over 5:00du/a, which is the maximum allowed:in the R-5 Zone. For these reasons, Tract 999 is to remain undeveloped at this time and under these:circumstances. It is only"open space" in the sense that it is undeveloped. It is nota"designated open space:'.` It is our understanding that should the property to-the east,which is currently not within the City of Renton, be annexed from King County, Tract 999 could be developed, as long as it met the development standards for the zone in effect at the time a land use application became vested. - The condition, though not clearly worded, istypical;of those.imposed on lots that do not conform to the minimum development standards: What is not typical is the opportunity . . you may have to create a legal lot from-thetract in-the future. The concern is that a house would be built on a."non-conforming" lot, either inadvertently or intentionally. A copy of this letter will be put in the official file in the City Clerk's office, with the Hearing Examiner's decision, to clarify the issue in the future if necessary. • Also, I have asked the Office of the Hearing Examiner to send you a copy of the decision'. It appears that the Parties of Record received the decision, but you, as the applicant did not, nor did the landowners. Sincerely, Elizabeth Higgins, AICP Senior Planner Copy: file 1901: '2001 Be&tract Ffr.d^c 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 .. " ": This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer to l:l 44 March 14, 2001 D�CITOY of NNN,NG MAR 19 2000 Elizabeth Higgins RECEIVED City of Renton, Dev. Services Div. 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: Amberwood Dear Elizabeth: In the Hearing Examiner's Report dated March 5th, 2001, Tract 999 is referred to as an "Open Space Tract" in Findings#12. In Findings#14, it is referred to as the"Entrance Tract". In Findings#22 it is referred to as the"Remainder at the Entrance". A clause that states not intended to be buildable is in recommendation#2; I assume meaning that this tract shall not be developed for housing. The Amberwood Plat submitted clearly states that this left over Tract 999 would be used for future development, not any of the above. I personally expressed in a previous meeting that I intended to sell this remaining property to the landowner to the east, so when they develop, they don't end up with a remaining, under-size, tract of developable ground. Please let me know if we can make a change in this verbage so the Tract can be sold for future development. Also, I have never received formal notification of the Hearing Examiner's Report. Normally a notice is sent to my address. Your attention to this matter would be greatly appreciated. Sincerel Steven Beck, Manager Amberwood L.L.C. 19129 S.E. 145th Street Renton, WA 98059 .. ' ' CIT F: RENTON. .ai. *. • :� `Hearing Examiner 41 Jesse Tanner,Mayor • -. ', Fred J.Kaufman March 19,2001 Elizabeth Higgins Development Services 1055 S:-Grady'Way Renton,WA 98055 Re: Arnberwood Preliminary Plat,.LUA00-150,PP,ECF; ' Dear Ms.Higgins: : This office has received your;request,to clarify Condition#2:in Which`the'phrase "both Tracts ' - was used. _ This office did in fact mean to refer to:bo`t„ ,Tracts,998 and.999,and.the final language drafted for review by the City Attorney.should specifically'refer to°"the Tracts by their respective numbers. This issue should not delay the appeal period,,which will.remain uncharged. -, If this office can be of further assistance,please feel free-to.write. ' Sincerely, f, I o ., Fred J:Kaufman . . , • Hearing Examiner • FJK:jt, �9��c1�2001 . �1 .. tou, Washington 98055:- (425) 43,0,6� 5;�' �0 �;�� �'• 055.South'Grady.Way, ..`Ren ... .. . - �. < :- . ,: : .... . :. : .. • , ,. ':�e�jr��;7 .yam ,1�. This paper contains,5o%recycled material;21)%post consumer. : ... . ell' "•' CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: March 15, 2001 TO: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Elizabeth Higgins, AICP SUBJECT: Amberwood Preliminary Plat, LUA00-150, ECF, PP This memo is sent to request a clarification of Condition #2 of the recommendation for the above referenced land use action. The condition refers to "both Tracts." Did you intend to include the tract numbers (998 and 999) in the condition, i.e: "both Tracts 998 and 999," tracts numbered 998 and 999," or "Tracts 998 and 999"? Thank you ► r 4, ^ CITY 0 RENTON aIL Planning/Building/Public Works Department ammo I Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator February 19, 2001 Mr. Steven Beck Amberwood LLC 19129 SE 145th Street Renton, WA 98059 SUBJECT: Amberwood Preliminary Plat Project No. LUA-00-150,PP,ECF Dear Mr. Beck: This letter is sent at your request to clarify when the Sewer Development Charge (SDC), East Renton Interceptor Special Assessment District No. 9204 fee (SAD), and latecomer charge (CENTEX)must be paid. It is our understanding that the Amberwood Plat must extend the main sewer line from the Maplewood Estates project located to the west ("Advisory Notes to Applicant," Plan Review — Sanitary Sewer, no. 6). The above referenced fees will be due when you receive the permit to do the construction necessary to extend this sewer main line. This is in accordance with Renton Municipal Code,4-1-18012b(v) The extension of the main line will be required prior to recording the plat. Sincerely, Elizabeth Higgins, AICP Senior Planner Copy: Sonja Fesser rt t 4r .. 1901 2001 Bock(cc lir.doc 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 ` y: This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer �,. I % AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss. County of King ) being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on thay of ��a=.7cei , ;MJ , affiant deposited in the mail of the United States a sealed envelope(s) containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Signature: SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this day of /1 , 2001. LOldje'I,1 r'y�ON FAO'''' Q /,i 1� ArNr.,Pat./.10 so z . Nota Public(i1i and for the State of Washington, n ;o ,o, o ; Residing at .J-P '.. ,therein. iI 47tOFwP Application,Petition, or Case No.: Amberwood Preliminary Plat LUA00-1 5 0,PP,ECF The Decision or Recommendation contains a complete list of the Parties of Record. HEARING EXAMINER'S REPORT March 5, 2001 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION APPLICANT: Steven Beck Amberwood LLC 10129 SE 145th Street File No.: LUA00-150,PP,ECF LOCATION: The project is located on NE 4th Street, at Rosario Avenue NE in northeast Renton SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Subdivide an approximately 4.63 acre property into 18 lots suitable for detached, single family houses SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on January 31,2001. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application,field checking the property and surrounding area;the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the February 6,2001 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday,February 6,2001, at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Preliminary Plat application, proof of posting, proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: Boundary and Topographic Survey Exhibit No. 4: Preliminary Utility, Grading, Elevation &Drainage Plan Exhibit No. 5: Tree Cutting and Clearing Plan Exhibit No. 6: Zoning Map The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner,Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way,Renton, Washington 98055. The area of the proposed development is currently undergoing a great deal of transition, and has been recently annexed into the City of Amberwood Preliminary Plat -- File No.: LUA00-150,PP,ECF March 5 2001 Page 2 Renton. The applicant has proposed subdivision of an approximately 201,755 sf property into 18 lots suitable for detached, single family houses. The lots would range in size from 7,200 sf to 8,884 sf. The property is zoned R-5,which allows a maximum of five dwelling units per net acre. Approximately 37,669 sf of the site, 18.6 percent,would be streets. This is a higher percentage than typical in a residential plat, partially due to the lack of development of streets in the area. The Examiner asked why the Environmental Review Committee(ERC)imposed the more stringent stormwater standards, if there are no critical areas on the property. Ms.Higgins replied that the area of the Highlands has experienced a great deal of problems with surface water runoff, partially due to Maplewood Creek. The City is also imposing the more recent, stricter King County drainage standards in this area, so that greater retention can be accommodated on properties. There are no wetlands on the property, but the general concern in this area has caused the City to impose the newer King County standards. The applicant has requested a modification from the City of Renton Street Standards, which would allow the public right-of-way to be narrowed from 50 feet to 42 feet. That modification request has been approved. The existing structures on the site would be removed, and approximately 7,500 cubic yards of fill would be re- graded on the site. The ERC issued a Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated. The mitigation measures include quite a few that relate to stormwater control and the prevention of erosion during the construction of the project. Additional mitigation measures include Transportation,Fire and Parks mitigation fees, and the recommendation that the geotechnical report be followed during design and construction. Ms.Higgins reviewed the project's consistency with Preliminary Plat Criteria. The project proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan land use designation of Residential Rural. It does not endanger any environmentally sensitive areas. The land is going to be developed into large lots,which is consistent with the transition area of the City. One of the policies of the Residential Rural plan is that development densities be a maximum of five homes for every net acre. The project is also consistent with the Transportation Element and the Environmental Element of the Comprehensive Plan. The underlying zoning designation complies with all the requirements of the R-5 development standards. The minimum lot size is 7,200 sf,with some lots quite a bit larger. The lots all exceed the lot depth and meet the lot width requirements. The lot arrangement is logical, with lot lines at right angles to the street. Each lot has access to a public street or road,with Lots 11, 12, 14 being accessed by easements. Access to the project would be primarily from NE 4th Street via the new road, Rosario Avenue NE, which would extend, offset from NE 3rd Street, into a cul-de-sac. Because the area has been annexed,the City is prepared to provide all services,with two exceptions. Water is proved by Water District 90. The applicant will be required to obtain a"will serve" letter from Water District 90. The property lies within the Issaquah School District, and is therefore subject to school impact fees. Staff recommends approval of the project, subject to the following conditions: (1)compliance with the ERC mitigation measures,(2)a"will serve"letter must be obtained from Water District 90 prior to obtaining building permits, (3)the applicant shall either draft and record a Homeowners' Association or a maintenance agreement for the maintenance of all common improvements, (4)the applicant shall spay Issaquah School District impact Fees prior to building permits, (5)the applicant shall post a sign on NE 3` Court at the east property boundary stating that the street is subject to future extension, and(5)construction easements obtained from abutting property owners may be necessary prior to construction of retaining walls on or near property lines. Lafe Hermansen, 3333 164" Street SW,Linwood,WA 98037 stated that he is the planner for the applicant. The applicant is in agreement with the staff report, and Mr.Hermansen is present to answer any questions. The Examiner asked for clarification of the construction easements on the property. Amberwood Preliminary Plat - - File No.: LUA00-150,PP,ECF March 5 2001 Page 3 David Cayton, Core Design,4205 l48th Avenue NE,Bellevue, WA 98007 said that no retaining walls are planned for the southwest area of the property. Mr. Cayton stated he is also the engineer for the Maplewood project. Grading can be designed so that both the rear of the lots of Maplewood and the rear of the lots at Amberwood can be benefited by making a smoother transition between plats. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak,and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 9:26 a.m. FINDINGS,CONCLUSIONS &RECOMMENDATION Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Steven Beck,filed a request for approval of an 18-lot Preliminary Plat together with two tracts. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M)for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located on the south side of NE 4th Street between Lyons Avenue SE(146th Avenue SE in King'County) on the west and Rosario Avenue SE(152nd Avenue SE in King County)on the east. NE 4th Street is SE 128th in King County. The subject site is on the eastern edge of the Highlands area of the City. 6. The subject site is approximately 4.63 acres in area. The parcel is rectangular. The subject site is approximately 615.62 feet long(north to south)by approximately 327 feet wide. 7. The subject site slopes approximately 6 percent or approximately 42 feet from the northeast corner to the southwest corner. 8. The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 4760 enacted in April 1999. 9. The subject site is currently zoned R-5 (Single Family- 5 dwelling units/acre). 10. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of single family uses at a rural density. 11. There is a single family home and garage on the subject site. These structures will be removed. 12. The applicant proposes dividing the subject site into 20 parcels. There would be 18 single family lots, a storm drainage tract and open space tract. The storm tract would be located in the southwest corner of the subject site. The open space tract would be at the northeast corner of the entrance to the plat. 13. The proposed lots would range in size from 7,200 square feet to approximately 8,884 square feet. The Amberwood Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA00-150,PP,ECF March 5 2001 Page 4 minimum lot size permitted in the R-5 District is 7,200 square feet. 14. The storm water tract is 18,568 square feet or approximately 148 feet wide(east to west)by 126 feet deep. The entrance tract is 4,230 square feet and only 33 feet wide 15. The proposed plat would be served by both an east-west street and a jogging north-south street. The east-west street,NE 3rd Court connects to a new plat immediately to the west and would stubbed on the east but would eventually connect to any plat east of the subject site. Rosario Avenue NE would intersect with NE 4th and then jog to the west and become Rosario Place NE and end in a cul-de-sac. Proposed Lots 1 to 4 would be located on the north side of NE 3rd Court with rear yards located along NE 4th Street. Proposed Lot 16 would be located along the east margin of the site with its access via NE 3rd Court. The remaining lots would be arrayed along both sides of the cul-de-sac or access via easements from the cul-de-sac. 16. Proposed Lot 14 would be accessed across Proposed Lot 15 via an easement. Proposed Lot 12 would share an access with Proposed Lot 11. 17. Most of the vegetation from the site, including approximately 178 trees that are 8 inches or greater, would be removed to allow preparation of the building pads and the new roads. 18. The applicant proposed developing 42 foot wide streets rather than the code required 50 foot wide streets. Road dimensions are determined by the Direl for administratively. 19. The east-west roadway will stub at the east property line. A sign at that location about the potential roadway extension will provide information to potential residents that through-traffic might occur in that location. 20. The development of 18 single family homes will generate approximately 172 vehicle trips per day (based on approximately 9.55 trips per dwelling). It Is anticipated that approximately 10%of the traffic trips will occur at each of the morning and evening peak hours. 21. The development of the subject site will generate approximately 8 or 9 school age children. These students would be spread among the different grades. The subject site is located within the Issaquah School District and School Impact Fees are required. 22. The two separate tracts are not intended to be buildable lots. One is a remainder at the entrance at NE 4th and the other will serve for storm water retention. 23. The City will provide sanitary sewer service. Domestic water will be provided by Water District 90. Assurance of domestic water should be obtained prior to recording the plat and selling individual lots. 24. The ERC imposed additional detention requirements since there are downstream problems. There will be a detention system to contain storm water and control its release rates. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proposed plat appears to serve the public use and interest. The proposed plat provides a density of 4.78 units per acre in keeping with the R-5 Zone which permits up to 5 units per acre. • Amberwood Preliminary Plat - - File No.: LUA00-150,PP,ECF March 5 2001 Page 5 2. While the lots are larger than some newer plats due to the underlying R-5 zoning,the applicant will still be removing a substantial number of trees in order to develop the lots. These lots will provide additional housing choices in the City in an area in which urban services are available. 3. Development of the site will introduce additional noise and population. There will be additional traffic, but staff did not indicate any problems with this additional traffic. 4. The subject site is in a sensitive drainage basin and,therefore,the ERC imposed conditions to avoid exacerbating drainage problems down stream. Storm water will be contained and diverted to avoid excessive flows. 5. The applicant will be providing for future access to the east through the subject site, thereby accommodating neighboring properties. Since this potential extension of NE 3rd Place will handle through traffic in the future,the applicant shall erect a sign at the end of it informing potential residents of that possibility. 6. The plat provides reasonably rectangular lots and lots that meet the dimensional requirements of code. Access seems reasonable, although the tier of lots along the north boundary of the plat will be sandwiched between two roads with less quiet and privacy. 7. The plat shall contain language acceptable to the City Attorney regarding the fact that both Tracts are not to be developed for housing, and development of them is precluded. 8. In conclusion,the proposed preliminary plat should be approved by the City Council subject to the conditions noted below. RECOMMENDATION: The Preliminary Plat is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall comply with the conditions imposed by the ERC. 2. The plat shall contain language acceptable to the City Attorney regarding the fact that both Tracts are not to be developed for housing, and development of them is precluded. 3. A"will serve" letter must be obtained from Water District 90 prior to recording the final plat. 4. The applicant shall either draft and record a Homeowners' Association or a maintenance agreement for the maintenance of all common improvements, including private stormwater facilities,utility and other easements, and other common areas, including the tracts numbered 998 and 999. A draft of the document shall be submitted to the City of Renton Development Services Division for review and approval by the City Attorney prior to the recording of the final plat. 5. The applicant shall pay Issaquah School District Impact Fees prior to building permits. 6. Construction easements obtained from abutting property owners may be necessary prior to construction of retaining walls on or near property lines. These agreements must include protection measures for(or permission to potentially damage or remove)trees located on abutting properties within 20 feet of the property line. Amberwood Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA00-150,PP,ECF March 5 2001 Page 6 7. The applicant shall erect a sign at the stub road that clearly informs potential residents of the possibility that the road will be extended and carry additional through-traffic. ORDERED THIS 5th day of March,2001. FRED J. KAU AN HEARING E MINER TRANSMITTED THIS 5th day of March,2001 to the parties of record: Elizabeth Higgins David Cayton 1055 S Grady Way Core Design Renton,WA 98055 4205 148th Avenue NE Bellevue, WA 98007 Lafe Hermansen 3333 164th Street SW Linwood, WA 98037 TRANSMITTED THIS 5th day of March,2001 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman,Plan/Bldg/PW Admin. Members, Renton Planning Commission Neil Watts,Development Services Director Larry Rude,Fire Marshal Sue Carlson,Econ.Dev. Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Larry Meckling,Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler South County Journal Betty Nokes,Economic Development Director Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 100Gof the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m.,March 19,2001. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14)days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110,which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department,first floor of City Hall. Amberwood Preliminary Plat - File No.: LUA00-150,PP,ECF March 5 2001 Page 7 If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. p.-j r 9 : fE 128th SO N . 4TH sT t 1 ,.1 tRS - i_ — , lil--:____s1r 7 Cl) SE 132nd St. . I- I. Sl CT w.4. `� R-8 vk k . in Li 1 o SE 136th St. .. SE 137th Pl. w 1 `_Lil SE 138th P1. j -. SE 13 8th S SE 139th P1. • . . 1 SE 139th —9 SE 140th Pl: • • 2 . Lc) w : fr., • Q. _ a_ SE 142nd St. _____-.-...:„..2} co 'SE 143rd SE 143rd P1, . . U ` �SEV 144th St. "et, a,,,- - 5E 145th Pl. VcagiLli I--- ..Cj WA„„ ,-, Zoe 11• �- ,' F7 0492.11) . zox610 pi Air r' _ P/N ' AL PW N[V= 1 I T9.,iAT xiiet+ RT 1 /9 • 09000 .0001•J N .....•.1 aeNflN 1031.04J < < dtt°W ilVIECI 0OO1-tZlO9H ISN CIED d'v'W.111NIIA 40 133105 YYYYVY'.,•[;�':: iV. R -i 1 O5 C o1,4��"n Y� 1'.��M•i"`_.y9•a'3�,.iyPiw,.��� �� \ .4N �s ZS �5 64 bF. iRdnn[.`nft�7a�1n ''..I�,,1 >:�..-1�-'.•I6l.'� �J '�1., rm Im°loo BY L�' a I'. �. YY In"r,-�1`•�'�:: eY RR „��. VnM.:,y1 Oq ., 4�� ,,,[u:n.c 1`1 YRYY .:4r1,�_;:lzi 91 • ��jry�,4j 0p Y Y�i NAM' n man m YY j;,cP.I9,w'r deer._. ,;y�w�ry� N a n _..___—_..__..._____ _ q9 t,....vl wad 1 ,: am..,.a?.°na9n°',;;M:,:'r�r .rY xz as • l YPYYYYYYx a'yv�l:�`V7r��RI'•<�'..AA•FS°■ ♦♦ 11617.0 LS'QLf M 8 LB9 N y ®P�1�rRnenxnlne-�, ea I I 7 �— 2 yi ��u.�rnnnnn[nnnnnn.>;nnYRaen'°`,„� i' ' I I 1 1 • `\' 'j� 7/q• .]:� V C Al.MNYW �1 3 2 . c 6y[ , 11.11 1111:r.0i. NO1MELI ` \ Ye. -1-.I 1 \LeWL F.104441dY N, u�waM "��nAM7 . • v.q.a ' '..... 9'b St Y4 Y a . • `♦ •INa, �' I-'n.wa Gas l ice@ -• 617- ®1P13S �.d )r' ?.1 t - ; %)�i;1 �' wwI 7.•�I��� n 77l�: f nem,runre,i -- ATA blow i YYYA, :+'�..6,7&„,`p^ j / ,•es Z LnnY/nrnnL I�'�u r�'S I .[�i t"n.[r J psY 1YtuY..ar r` ;� �i��1' Yy. I _, r A I >, �.. _ J1".. ..w[._ T—: _ .:.-_: Y...`_, lb 7 lY.uu `33 `"Ill yull iQ , ,\ `�.'.YY%.....;__ ..;y,......, i� N. ` 1 a tir dal, ki pltammorkal �- .Pi i '11 i$ r ' r n•Ou �, 0O 0'C i ,,yt� yrlrl�;y,� t:"1 \ 4 `51:3 _ Ij4 Y i,n YY; I 1 ,r. "' gvjcl roe•��AJ y ��� r�•-- wrolFlo�Jo wurz'iu uxwu r ......._.. , rt 'i>' 1 f 1'd I �a �°y.'.Y� or' c n ° 'S ♦1 l oT Ye.m0. ,,, G MR.YY•LW V.VMS 7ar•Nrl1a bNOla - ..• '`i L I S r l ' r ;1 1 G li• /071'Ja KILO rPILLW OOL•I1 YO astiH 17 1 �`.-� 1:., ,:: I 1 �\ L L Zti Arw•IC V�a'J.s.vlf "MN lmll• r 11 KU 71'Da NM w bola aware MI•al0 KJ>aI4•401t U ,.+ `.. I i I L--�!!![.r i�r ��'`� ---� 1 q'y. 'i,�1 I •.[ C ...oWeY +� rll 'RYNO2 RINKS r.r_.-..nmu Y[O uwr ba gJ` e----- av xr N111q.ne '' '�• R _ T_�y"a++...!"_...r_,.�__i..._ 0 y •� "v.,� 7Yma•'.W0N9a Ea111Y06L1 IWO'a V'41 rut IN IN wl NI•=1C1 9T•aYg aa.'YO.4•Lew 11` �'xx J.-4.-�`9•01,0s ifiW °1 I1 S �S `� .i/1 g 7.ma•LY'111.Na®maJw.1 141/VC I YNrN NO 1x1Y1.IGLOO Jc All"r41•F11rY1 KAMM "` i j l(�_.: 6 i tl Y�. 'r j, yI , I I{.�}Q'IS. 4.' 1\ I ., q V a (�9'S 5'S7'n.aa[J r Y, ',', ' 'III•io,N0.'YIN'% - - -- - - ---- --- - 11 I 1 T• 1, m\\ 1 • .� ' c80) e wmYoal >WM...FiOMO; i I� ' �all ' �S__z_u .[r.?+? l 7,141.1. _ 4 1 MOH AvuvJ news 7vn®•O.Y1.'.1.1 7 I It• ''1 1 .,__.- --`�- `. \ - . 40 nanr Mg V•r•utOL TAW 1[r 7,14LL .•.•..•.'-l � jr l`'`i' `L a j..u\ , �'F ~`-_ '•OeOGIe • gP''S. p•.. , ,1 AL•WSW bN.1+m10'Jm,lltaNn aIDa11o7�1 a11a.10 a•ac+l,u O.•d lioY / . • ••, ``Ql •\}� `•y r�'Y17`l ' .01.40. i a Oir 62 A 'IA....iO:�••ulo ii 4Yw/11K aum0 MX 01 aa1V1+77 JOaraLL 1�Y n MINION ONL uaaa '•�I '9�(�': r �{ d I d ..-_._,._.... 1•0110RIN.IR , ,['-'i—'�?f..1 LS.,_�y I O -N., 90I1911id19 31i 9 •w[m%DI M 1.rlanau ausurnPn•tan a BROW twlo A �. __Ls," y' .L JINorr1O1'M WNDaa JO llaulrl,LoamllioN Yet b llaOYbaO ''i'N;,'• 't'r •. ,d I � ---w--- '4 -- 1a1fRYYOr1 all 40 ilili•TO 19Y'gY11011 QLL iJ JNN 1at7 aN1 } q C rloalv� N011d12lQ9Q 1'd�3'1 j � ` 'o;17)Q�E %• ayr '�, y F +[w.,J•NavNvwaN aun'1xwrJ IA \ `', '`., '1 �. 5 dg ua•aw reel i • P WE 21.11111VN MNYNLm-•COW _..... •„ �•a.4 J �r I °� w e.. . �(�� '^� aO.L3NIfIG/a193N19N.�/>tl�hfr9� n °R °[ ° i Imo., i ~-�i i��--�.-i i� �\.• I _ .�,i�. 64044,°vmi UN/MI r0i� = N l :TWOS ��,�.e "�: I ?7 ° _y l a y xT. ,a I I e 1mYua ruaN w SON 4 I wr S�{1 ? �''1'4�^ F-....iv'�a[tc•`i..i'w wu��. .Yr.Y • f ;< Fj IxN .t+1 �c �6' c '�, r�'.� 9F L� r"r4�?t �. 1®.MP r>•'°i wa• :l c�t B �!�Y3j �� I 'f I N t<k►.;: i�r Noealor.Pa+rt1 r alma I 3i ;;I xsr ec\ i '•� I '`1 ! i I •i 'I WarrO " m i y y J �_a 3�.7 T -;9'•Z��j` 5 1N4'71'IddV2i3N90 5 `\ y -1 --- -- 1' Y1MIa �t 1 3 l 4 ra MT' '_____'__.__...._._•1_.'.__. _ °fie m; y /•WmY.f/t 0Yf1/ K // ,, ,, 1 J` a I Yr . CITY OF RCNTOPI '...._......__- -o .:.:_.._. ' .__.._....., RECEIVED . s, ......54....._...:... ,. 1 and...,an aa ,j...__ IA....._.__ 1..._._......� —7-- '___ ,. � -... . ..._._ 7._......_.._�1..._..._._...:..._._... NYYN L•SLK r 11 • JAN 3 2001 ._ ,., — _ f _BUILDING DIVISION 0 TrAl "3 9 36!! "N ea' e/M.i 'fri D3S Y/i MN /,1 MN • NW 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC.'14, TWP 23 N., RGE 5 E., W.M.• 1 • . . • , ; .1 -- 1.7.7.17—— SCALE: 1" ... 40' , —7---- N. /4TH S1r --- T•71".1.6 6.144,3 1.1 .14 — ' .7. ---t---"-.....H —.,----4.,...-7--. . . . -#--- IN , I-- i .....a....,..2.2.ti, ______ _......._-V,1.-.S—11.2•i 11-.2' ' ... ••",-...,.-- •77Iiirflaiiiriiiiiiiiiiihiagi'Z'VtiFi: • •iiia44i-roviiii.W6+7.1Tiii•iiire.=?- iiiii• ii --i-:;-•• T.i.iAiii"i'"''''''''''"'"'"iiii'' ,.., ev,....,, 1..,,c.....,......N...,...k... i.,.k /si . ,!,,. ...-,-,;__f....... -• :----,-57—r—z----4, ,--7,14-- \ ,... (. ,, ......:-: ,i.1 \. • OMERAPPLICANT 1K 1/4i 7 i OMER: t*C111 I) DAVID e NANCY JOHNSON 1 \ I \ , \ ' ' '.."I .1; I.! \ BENCHMARK 8001 NE 4P1 MEET ., 5 1-.1• \II \ ' \ RENTON.WA.800S0 . ..71 \\', , . `,.; '4 • < ii! .' N3144.19 ..., ASIDEANOCO I.LC '•,3,7 .:38 I.1t5 4 s' 3 ''"" •r.,,, 2 is• A .... g liiii"F.:,;>;; \ lit2J St I1STI STRUT '..,il . *"....... pISENT:.:ARK.:NPER2.0.1/..OFAR.01:0;1,SI:YETTa 6N.,11:•04:SIST.DA(.711t. UST IU:NIEN.MA.00050 (ISA T70-0100 1 Ii z ; EC.184.7?OR(111.014 METERS) \I ••• ", ,, • , INS IN ICC MN ST. PLANNERANPINEER/SURVEYOR .----.4,1 \, is C \ 'riii,;Iragn ji Ili! 1 ,1 ! T.T.v.;x1.r."--12"RTAcc D''.r" T. COKE DESIGN.INC. . . I I i ..' El-517.01 OR(let 013 MCIERS) 4205-1421111 AVE._11.2,1114E 200 \ kkLI;J.H.. ,......... . -. N')oommoom111.---".......- M.N.._ .21...._, '...1 Nstibb\,„\..", ' CONTACT:LATE NERMAP0301-Plannor . i \ °A"Drv,.1.1...ar_s_, .......... NAP:TRraw..ATE LOCA1101 Of CONTOURS \• Illi. 111' ' SS ',— ,NN- 6.a' 1 u • •1. 2 a vi- , . , .., ,..., 42. Me SITE STATISTICS t 115. SO. ':7'...77-- .. \''' • '. 1/I'I r / ,,' s. !fa 9 .-..' I s•..,i t.T.. , te IJICA DISRIRSED APPROX.1.7 AMES a, \ • -11-5. 1 ,., , 0 : ; k il-a3. 1 • 5 •, ill ,I \ .\. k , , . ,„ , • APPROX EARTHWORK a z ‘\ . , ,.,,,, , .• . - , ,• ,.,, .,„., ,,,, .„,...,s•;!4.39 •4,0 • ,..., •Mal&We MEW CONOLEX STRIPPING 2000 CY. 4.000 C.C. \ • ''.. .', I ,' I I , EXCAVATON \ \ '', I \ I 1 t \ \ ..,, YERTICAL CORO•CUTTER \ \ tql ! .1 ; \\ ON-SITE ROAD SECTION CNVORCrypir SW/Mx; EIMANIENENT 4.000 CA \ I —00 , I ‘I, iiirti, mr.,*i_.., . 1 4„..,.."ii 4 ;... s....\si...‘,....\\,..‘........‘....._...................,.....1 1 I II ' "iii•iii-, i ,i .. IC""'"""'W.-,aii...ti•......* . i F AV VALE LEGEND LaZ i ., Will.\ \ '••••• \ i:1 '-...............-„:::,... ;.•'''''''' ;; v.; f " snruoverAL/IL SLOFC y--, , .,,,i ....„._,.. Lr, ••....... 4.Y 11( FIRE NITRANT .\ !.. \ \.e.I '... i • ,• ' ! ' etr" Ifflr0177..\- Jr r..2. • ' MANN COSMO --W—RATER UTLEY °WADE OR MINI" —ws—SANITARY SEWER UMW '' • r.. ' .• " \- r II '...1 WI a ,••• , '' cosiLVO COYELIELE • ,, 1:. ..,,,,,,, ... 1 ..r Loi Ill ; II ' • ,.• .....-.... ROAD --%•-•,-..4.12;,....H • WO NEW DESWN CRAM MYR MORO —.SD—.STORM 6946146E VICITY —180—PRCPOSED CONTOUR ELEVATON C...) ''... .?.If. ""'"".""1 111' Ii' Ill ' 151 i 1 i I; /4\ ,,L.. ... \ '• \ - "';' \ ••• OHSPOLOAVAIF WOO AND smectonr -- —.45--COSMO CONTOUR CLEVATION ' N., .t 1:21 .....!,..,1 CCCO ROMER, CNi .1'WIEN?OCWOREII SOEWAIR • t ..- --yea N - , i 1 11—••••••-i i 1 ! A 1 13; ,z•,...6V ANVEIGIPS —. AREA 7D PROM'A SLIYALar SuR-WASE\ )Wl I•4. color LJONC•11E IfIt7X,AL WRO ••MX ELSEIWWWW) AND CLI7TER ZR 2P-1 \ \ ' '1, \ SWITCH A-A k obi . 1 %r • \ ..„ ,0 .<.__I_J1.1 \ • °\.- ,7'.-----......_ NE 4TH ST. HALF-STREET IMPROVEMENTS :1:: 1Led 6 . •• ILO SCALE k&0 ''<1.. i'' s) 4'4.''''': "."2•1\ \' N •• • (4 LI.J- . ...„_...\ —"II". 13 \...i........,:::.'"'",.. ' i\:',0 • s Llia liljA., i''.- s .....‘ '14ii a. 7 ..,\ • • 4. ..'.. Tr'' 11:-....._,...5.5•___ .- . .A ..,.., vi . _. , .,... _.,_.....„,,...-,•._-_=7".1in. ',jail& It , .' \ \ iiiiiiiiiiiii.e-s -....t.... liwatiiiiii . • .' • . --.„.... 14-V.---- - ..'lltiL :::_';',1P,:::::.,' • ••••.1, 1111 .. --...., i. !;!..7. 1 PI' ........ b f.".-i 7) ! \ a \ ‘....„......1 .... ..,:::1113- 1•- .7 To, r,s. ,A ,•I ,t2N.. ....,,.. il•... I Ti! ' .,. , •• ..• I, • '996 .. ' 1:1:i '45 • 4 "-- 11'. .* . 1.1 ,‘ •1 ...s., .t. •......... ....., . , g •,.. 411c_.\ •,.........•••••••• ) \ • . F; z \ \-ne' •. •111`4,1.....,t1•-•.:. .. • ' R1E i 8 i ....... ,,,,,,,,,.,,,. i..,.... .......;,...;....4:-.-,\. • -.---c,, \...... ::r40.- • \ •., '.1, \ '‘. 1\., \ \, k , ', 1 SHEET-- OF \ I 49 •, 50 + \ k Sy.., • I' ; k k \ •- . PR..,NUNOCR 1::...1:‘ S,.. \ , i . '.../L ...-.." 00059 . tm 1 . . City of Renton PUBLIC Department of Planning/Building/Public Works HEARING PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Public Hearing Date: February 6, 2001 Project Name: Amberwood Preliminary Plat Applicant/ Steven Beck Address: Amberwood, LLC 19129 SE 145th Street Renton, WA 98059 Owner/ David and Nancy Johnson Address: 6001 NE 4th Street Renton WA 98059 File Number: LUA-00-150, PP, ECF Planner: Elizabeth Higgins Project Summary: The applicant has proposed subdivision of an approximately 201,755 sf(4.63 acre) property into 18 lots suitable for detached, single family houses. The property is located on NE 4th Street, at Rosario Avenue NE, a proposed new street, in a Residential 5 (R-5) Zone. There would be new public streets on the property. A modification from street standards has been requested by the applicant to allow a reduction in the right-of-way width from fifty feet to forty-two feet. There is a single family structure on the site that would be removed. The project requires Preliminary Plat approval and administrative approval of a street modification. Project Location: The project is located on NE 4th Street, at Rosario Avenue NE in Northeast Renton. City of Renton P/B/PW Department - Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner AMBERWOOD PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA00-150,PP,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: February 6, 2001 Page 2 of 11 HEARING EXHIBITS: Exhibit 1: Project File (no date) Exhibit 2: Sheet 1 of 1; Preliminary Plat, Vicinity Map, Neighborhood Detail Map (rev. 1/26/01) Exhibit 3: Sheet 1 of 1; Boundary and Topographic Survey (rev. 1/26/01) Exhibit 4: Sheet 1 of 1; Preliminary Utility, Grading, Elevation & Drainage Plan (revl/26/01) Exhibit 5: Sheet 1 of 1; Tree Cutting & Clearing Plan (rev. 1/26/01) Exhibit 6:Zoning Map (12/99) N.t.-4Tli �N • •---:�----r__-- -•sw� .._��,.__-- -----�_--._—_' rum Ie ____ ram__ _____ -I•---ry'"--- -N, _ .. 'F:` :1 f7,\\II \ I''', �',..v1 `\', , , l� i. ' �- •� -1 • `�� 1, ��� ,iX1;r\I•.. \',5 janr ,li -•,,_ _ . y.,, : \ ,,;,1 t 6 • 41 ;42 L . 7 \\ lam_' 7 ,l ' ! !i - .:::� 7 \ • i , ---- .ale: • •-45, '.,,A-`" i I 1,o, • ,BBB .. `::$•1, ', i t, • n\ ,. 1-.x.,\ 3� B78'6'w '�"" -...._1_ •me. n, •Hann I� a\.L awA n•xe.. ., \ 50 1 ' t °,h „\ I I 1 ...\��� HEXreport,doc • City of Renton P/B/PW Department ` Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner AMBERWOOD PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA00-150,PP,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: February 6, 2001 Page 3 of 11 B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owners of Record: David and Nancy Johnson 6001 NE 4th Street Renton WA 98059 2. Zoning Designation: Residential 5 (R-5) 3. Comprehensive Plan Residential Rural Land Use Designation: 4. Existing Site Use: Single family residential home (to be removed) 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Recently developed subdivision, "Windsong" (reviewed by King County), zoned R-5 West: Currently being developed, "Maplewood Estates" subdivision, zoned single family residential (R-5) South: Undeveloped, zoned single family residential (R-5) East: Unincorporated King County 6. Access: New public street, Rosario Avenue NE, extended NE 4th Street and NE 3rd Court, extended from the Maplewood Subdivision. 7. Site Area: 201,755 sf (4.63 acre) C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date Zoning N/A 4404 06/07/93 Comprehensive Plan N/A 4498 02/20/95 Annexation N/A 4760 04/21/99 D. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE 1. Residential 5 du/ac (R-5) Zone Standards, Development Regulations 4-2-110A 2. Grading, Excavation and Mining Regulations, Development Regulations 4-4-060 3. Street Standards, Development Regulations 4-6-060 4. Subdivision Standards, Development Regulations 4-7 5. Tree Cutting and Land Clearing Regulations, Development Regulations 4-4-130 HEXreport.doc . City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner AMBERWOOD PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA00-150,PP,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: February 6,2001 Page 4 of 11 E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Land Use Element— Residential Single Family 2. Transportation Element 3. Housing Element 4. Environmental Element F. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant has proposed subdivision of an approximately 201,755 sf (4.63) property into 18 lots suitable for detached, single family houses. Lots would range in size from 7,200 sf to 8,884 sf. The property is located at 6001 NE 4th Street, in a Residential 5 (R-5) Zone, which allows a maximum of 5.0 dwelling units per net acre (du/a). Approximately 37,669 sf (0.86 acres) of the site, 18.6 percent, would be streets. This area would be deducted from the gross square footage of the site for density calculations. The net site area would be 164,086. sf (3.77 acres), therefore the density would be 4.78 du/a. Access would primarily be from a new public street, Rosario Avenue NE, which intersects with NE 4th Street. The new street would intersect with NE 4th Street at the north boundary of the proposed plat and with NE 3rd Court, an extension of a new public street built by the Maplewood Estates developer. Rosario Place NE, would provide access to Lots 5 through 15, 17, and 18. A modification from street standards has been requested to reduce the width of the public right- of-way from 50 feet to 42 feet. The modification request has been approved. Existing structures on the site would be removed. Approximately 7,500 cubic yards of fill would be re-graded, with cut and fill balanced, on site for building pads, utility and road base construction, and general site fill prior to building construction. The project requires Environmental Review, Preliminary Plat approval, and administrative approval of a reduced public street right-of-way. Because the entire site would require grading, it is expected that almost all trees would be removed. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21 C, 1971 as amended), on December 12, 2000, the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated. The appeal period closed on January 2, 2001, with no appeals having been filed. HEXreport.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department - Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner AMBERWOOD PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA00-150,PP,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: February 6, 2001 Page 5 of 11 3. COMPLIANCE WITH ERC MITIGATION MEASURES The Environmental Review Committee imposed mitigation measures that the applicant is required to comply with prior to recording the final plat. They are as follows: 1. The project shall comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). 2. A silt fence shall be installed along the downslope perimeter of the area that is to be disturbed. The silt fence shall be in place before clearing and grading is initiated, and shall be constructed in conformance with the specifications presented in the KCSWDM. 3. Shallow drainage swales shall be constructed in intercept surface water flow and route the flow away from the construction area to a stabilized discharge point. Vegetation growth shall be established in the ditch by seeding or placing sod. Depending on site grades, it may be necessary to line the ditch with rock to protect the ditch from erosion and to reduce flow rates. The design and construction of drainage swales shall conform the specifications presented in the most recent KCSWDM. 4. The project contractor shall perform daily review and maintenance of all erosion and sedimentation control measures at the site during the construction of both off-site and on- site improvements as well as building construction. 5. Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation shall be submitted by the project Engineer of Record to the Public Works Inspector for the construction of the civil improvements of the plat. Certification of the installation, maintenance, and proper removal of the erosion control facilities shall be required prior to recording of the plat. 6. The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee at the rate of$75.00 per each new average weekday trip attributable to the project, estimated to be 9.55 average weekday trips per new residence. The Transportation Mitigation Fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. 7. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$488.00 per each new single family residential lot created by the proposed plat. The fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. 8. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee at the rate of$530.76 per each new single family residential lot. The fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. 9. The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the geotechnical engineers, Terra Associates, Inc., in their report, dated September 15, 2000. HEXreport.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner AMBERWOOD PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA00-150,PP,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: February 6,2001 Page 6 of 11 4. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address site plan issues from the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. 5. CONSISTENCY WITH PRELIMINARY PLAT CRITERIA: Approval of a plat is based upon several factors. The following preliminary plat criteria have been established to assist decision makers in the review of the plat: (a) Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan Designation: The proposal should be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan land use designation of Residential Rural. The Objective and Policies of Residential Rural designation are as follows: Objective LU-I: Preserve open space and natural resources and protect environmentally sensitive areas by limiting residential development in critical areas, areas identified as part of a city-wide or regional open space network, or agricultural lands within the City. There are no designated open space, natural resource, or environmentally sensitive areas on the property. The land has been deemed suitable for single family, residential development which would more fully utilize existing urban infrastructure in the area. By developing this land, the preservation of other property, located in more critical areas, may be more likely. Therefore, the proposed project furthers the objective of the land use element. Policy LU-26: Maximum development densities should range from one home per ten acres to five homes per acre... The project, as proposed at 18 lots, has a density of 4.78, which is below the maximum allowed in the zone of 5.0 du/a. Transportation Element The proposal should be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element. The Comprehensive Plan anticipates that increased urban densities would result in fewer, and shorter, vehicle trips. The proposed project would increase housing density within the City. Housing Element The proposal should be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Housing Element. HEXreport.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner AMBERWOOD PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA00-150,PP,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: February 6,2001 Page 7 of 11 By adding 18 lots/houses to a property that has only one single family house, the proposed project would increase the City's housing supply, thereby furthering an objective of the City of Renton. Policy H-4, "Encourage infill development as a means to increase capacity," would particularly be met by this project. Environmental Element The proposal should be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Environmental Element. The applicant has proposed a surface water control system that would collect, detain, treat for pollutants, and provide a controlled release of stormwater. A private system would be maintained by a Homeowners' Association. Approximately 178 trees 8 inches and greater, shown on an existing tree inventory submitted by the applicant, would be removed from the property. The applicant must adhere to the requirements of the Forest Practices Act, a state regulation that is administered by the Department of Natural Resources. A Class IV permit for conversion of forested land to another use and removal of more than 5000 board feet of timber (for sale, not personal use)would be required. The applicant would need to apply for and obtain this permit from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources. The individual lots would be landscaped following house construction. (b) Compliance with the underlying zoning designation: The proposal site is designated Residential 5 (R-5), on the City of Renton Zoning Map. The intent of the R-5 Zone is to establish areas for single family residences with the goal of obtaining densities of up to 5.0 dwelling units per net acre and to prohibit the development of uses that are incompatible with residential development. The R-5 Zone is permitted in areas of the City designated as Residential Rural in the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed development would allow for future construction of up to 18 new single family dwelling units. Minimum lot size permitted in the R-5 zone is 7,200 sf. The lots are above the minimum width requirements for the R-5 Zone of 70 feet for corner lots and 60 feet for interior lots. They are above the minimum depth requirement of 70 feet. The minimum front yard setback in the R-5 Zone is 20 feet, the minimum rear yard setback is 25 feet, and the side yard setbacks are 5 feet for interior lots and 15 feet for corner lots. The proposed plat would provide 18 lots ranging in size from 7,200 sf to 8,884 sf. The proposed development would have the about same density as the project abutting on the west, Maplewood Estates,"which is also in a Residential 5 Zone. (c) Compliance with Subdivision Regulations: Lot Arrangement: Side lot lines are to be at right angles to street lines, and each lot must have access to a public street or road. Access may be by private access easement street per the requirements of the Street Improvement Ordinance (Code Section 4-34). The proposed lot arrangement generally complies with the lot arrangement requirements of the Subdivision Regulations. Lot Lines are at right angles to street lines, or radial to the HEXreport.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department -= Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner AMBERWOOD PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA00-150,PP,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: February 6, 2001 Page 8 of 11 edge of the cul-de-sac. Some lot lines are somewhat angular, due to the need to provide access. Lots: The size, shape and orientation of lots shall meet the minimum area and width requirements of the applicable zoning classification and shall be appropriate for the type of development and use contemplated. The lots, as proposed, would meet or exceed the minimum area requirement of the Residential —5 Zone, 7,200 sf, as indicated in the following table: Lot Number Size (sf) Access Configuration 1 8,756 public street rectangular 2 7,620 public street rectangular 3 7,620 public street rectangular 4 7,799 public street rectangular 5 8,365 public street rectangular 6 7,200 public street rectangular 7 7,200 public street rectangular 8 7,205 public street rectangular 9 7,537 public street rectangular 10 7,200 public street rectangular 11 8,272 public street rectangular 12 8,361 public street rectangular 13 7,441 public street rectangular 14 8,884 public street rectangular 15 8,696 public street rectangular 16 8,372 public street rectangular 17 7,393 public street rectangular 18 7,377 public street rectangular Property Corners at Intersections: All lot corners at intersections of dedicated public rights- of-way, except alleys, shall have minimum radius of 15 feet. Lots at intersections (Lots 1,5, and 18) are shown to have minimum radii of 15 feet. (d) Reasonableness of Proposed Boundaries Access The proposed project would be accessed by two off-site public streets, NE 4th Street and NE 3rd Court. NE 3`d Court is a new street, built by the Maplewood Estates development abutting on the west. NE 4th Street is the primary arterial through northeast Renton. The City street grid system would be furthered by the construction of Rosario Avenue NE into the plat and the continuation of NE 3rd Court through the plat to serve potential future development to the east. Lots 12 and 14 would be accessed by means of access easements across Lots 11 and 13 respectively. HEXreport.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department • Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner AMBERWOOD PRELIMINARY PLAT L UA00-150,PP,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: February 6,2001 Page 9 of 11 A modification from City of Renton street standards has been requested by the applicant and approved by the Director of the Development Services Department. Topography The property does not have slopes that are regulated as critical areas in the City. There is an elevation change of approximately 42 feet across the site (6 percent slope). The site will require grading for streets and building pads, however. Approximately 7,500 cubic yards of material will be graded to justify grades and for road subsurface. Relationship to Existing Uses The area of the property has existing residential development of varying densities. The subdivision abutting to the north has smaller lots, but was developed while in unincorporated King County and does not conform to City of Renton zoning standards. The property to the east is still in King County and has not been zoned by the City of Renton or redeveloped. The use would be non-conforming to Renton zoning regulations. The property abutting to the west, Maplewood Estates, is also zoned R-5. (e) Availability and Impact on Public Services (Timeliness) Police and Fire Police and Fire Prevention Bureau staff indicate that sufficient resources exist to furnish services to the proposed development, subject to conditions of the Environmental Review Committee determination, Code required improvements, and fees. A Fire Mitigation.Fee would be required as a condition of the environmental review. Recreation No plans for recreational or open spaces have been submitted by the applicant. There are no developed park facilities in the vicinity of the project, although land held by King County and intended for park use lies immediately southeast of the project site. A Park Mitigation Fee would be required as a condition of the environmental review. Stormwater The applicant submitted a conceptual drainage plan and drainage report, which has been accepted by the Plan Review Department. Stormwater would be collected and treated on site, using a stormwater tract at the southwest corner of the property. Treated stormwater would be discharged to the system being developed by the Maplewood Estates project. Sewer Sanitary sewer service is available from the City of Renton, via a new line located in NE 4th Street. Sewer main extensions will be required to serve the new parcels. HEXreport.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department - Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner AMBERWOOD PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA00-150,PP,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: February 6,2001 Page 10 of 11 Water The property is within Water District 90. Service would be provided by Water District 90. A "will serve" letter must be obtained from the Water District. Street Improvements Frontage improvements would be required along NE 4th Street. These improvements would include curb, gutter, sidewalks, street widening, street lights, street drainage, and undergrounding of overhead utilities. Coordination with Metro, the King County public transportation authority, has also been requested so that a transit stop can be coordinated with the Windsong development on the north. Schools The proposed project lies within the Issaquah School District, and is therefore, subject to school impact fees. G. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat, Amberwood Preliminary Plat, Project File No. LUA00-150, PP, ECF, subject to the following conditions: (1) Compliance with ERC Mitigation Measures: The applicant is required to comply with the Mitigation Measures, which were required by the Environmental Review Committee Threshold Determination. (2) A"will serve" letter must be obtained from Water District 90 prior to obtaining building permits. (3) The applicant shall either draft and record a Homeowners' Association or a maintenance agreement for the maintenance of all common improvements, including private stormwater facilities, utility and other easements, and other common areas, including the tracts numbered 998 and 999. A draft of the document shall be submitted to the City of Renton Development Services Division for review and approval by the City Attorney prior to the recording of the final plat. (4) The applicant shall pay Issaquah School District Impact Fees prior to building permits. (5) The applicant shall post a sign on NE 3rd Court at the east property boundary stating that the street is subject to future extension. (6) Construction easements obtained from abutting property owners may be necessary prior to construction of retaining walls on or near property lines. These agreements must include protection measures for (or permission to potentially damage or remove) trees located on abutting properties within 20 feet of the property line. HEXreport.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department= Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner AMBERWOOD PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA00-150,PP,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: February 6, 2001 Page 11 of 11 EXPIRATION PERIODS: Preliminary Rats (PP) expire five (5) years from final approval (signature) date. HEXreport.doc 69000 J • N oo«•.I a3ennN la3roaa dyy4-nriaQ cootiN09NvIgN dV'W,111N171/� le { L 40 133N5 irlitir4`YiYYYYY •yo:on"e��h I MarridoNWPM OM �a r� n a > nCerFa «"i���I.n��olSES �,�z.:i....IM.a T.v 9b Li' a ,1 en�tvfa uv1.YYYY vvi .\-+c Fv .. !•t2Yu c, a'f You 4uj. fiiC f, Ara .z Y"adzi a S O 2 0 9YY9 YY N N t"-Lia 7 rt ie�' u _ • Et. -t :mm.itfArangSVITtriirILIMIgill - _ 11: _aar ��� �R�fr 1 N G w 0 LI [ .V4mWf\ � LS'ZC M,90,9L9B N •L w fY 9Y E rnn e'r�=�._ • 0 5 JI' 1im�aD) C '�� G."C A 6 V is .�.�.uy�ft.FY.a �i,�fneeeeeeennenanultn.n� • n i / `I r 3 , r o•lt i i , ) / / , _-- >^4 i N I -__�. cp Ulf.. I I -l. 'jp9i:\ q. • ______T'yq ®.�eeee�l N O laN 3 a 'n n.t• d ..j.. , tarrL.•rnwa iaYiat��\ 9b Si" ' BSI yrr.a�' u a • \ 'S11 id �6 P I BE'' l-v�r1`:`_\',.`-..... MelF5.® !.:fin I 'VI- J } •. `. a GGYNYl'i%JYNu 's' / MM. !®Ie•,5Py6 • /0'1 ' enxarartrnil,,, �ls�wyy�t/ ee.i_:..Yal• .d uawrii.. _ 4 :•eti �. ::7717ff/Y]G]TIG7�-J �r..:, � L'.iF,!<_+;��—■ tu� .✓n �`., ` . �,/ ii. •yJJ np 1'7"d.�� r--'i°-----':x''-'-Ill \4 `-''fSt9... ��• a m m _g I,1 MORI A7C11-minim-�®�Y..�lflir �� u �31, ,,;..„, 4.._i� r \\_. s.�I x- ..HALL . bRl (� a Y �� � F L I ,A.T.-' E.` I, s —.. {'' N ,) is alpIllilailll .r: ,:,-,N. �`7 ZI i0 0 K �laul �0dm iN ¢.J \T '`,J I= 9�ari i•�¢ia'♦S m ovo • �m �� 1 btin 0 N e _ _ _- ��i�,tE , i' �� i i I J.h ]a�ot %y "n m • r` w AAA .a' '�1 ..•)v tl `J O V . Y41i - —n,' gic�v_.,..C1 Ja[nuir0 a0 tCLLt�Jo,3lruxcaildv __.._._. _ IIII ' I�'.PI\`yo)I 'g I I id 51 -W I 4'•L ____-er\^ a�I` Vt rure+O rev va a.ca ;pJoaraa `'I f/i I fis,j , ,, 43 I �L ;`€'\+ Zb lb (aar313.Y aoLn)>w arua,3 �' ' il (^ ?GAO 74 aAr N11a1 "i ��L__ :J�' L_� ___J - D 3,' Mg AO Y/N)va a•ri[ N3NV 133L1Ca I'la MIS 3a 1NI WU NI 041C1 302.9119 aarNta NZA0a1a•[OILId t 4 I- I I ,� a•>I 9tLNO1[M19Dt3 f__ •rlr.l)eri LL'I•r'03 ?I m L(�4 1S•t:' r ,. O r`` .--- 2 3B aAr M1N1 t rla :I p, P*"'_-_;`-fi: _ •1� - p ornra 7'-119710 auulm3.1 MOO'2a)'la H11,94'ua au w 7410 ax+Yro vevaw,[•ewl.0 I I� , ,•;,,`L.._1 •2"-1 , ;10 '\'' .$ ;o • , .�•,_}?ti .. Or/RO a9Y`A11aN3a NurO 794 CAM NO AZAY1p tu1N91.0 ALo Yid MOWN n0,99 !,¢l '! •'. I `Sy\t M� I ♦ r i,•�I ..` 1 I •}$/'4' 1 I' o4, v y IJ'r s -n,wtY9` ,��� U, E n •4 WAIL 'a91m WralJAv Jb WNON39 r 5 r P! i1 \ m rr', ` .'?.9 D+7` A(O 9 %MX,'ON -1_., l• \ I•."91 i'.. i .,____�_,__ ♦ .Le__t_roT+�a_J! V 99791 XI:WA iTW9 '3 2 C240�'' I 1 W '7p. .I yi-.-''t--•- 1 ` .\ O (928tre CMr)'3G IaaL'10t •/3tl9'311a,Y101 1'' yV' S In. ♦ .utl!) ` I t o } l J m� '•oaoal a `. , P> \ •`-I, t.i • ,`.�.: '` e-'fo N,F•,i H HOI.41C•WaLi 'ON•JttON003y L3a![1 t93atb03>•a330 AD aiaGVmlu avoa alof I 9t ly+ �'`\ttel \ `,I\Il. \, r S i ' a._,..--- ,..„..1 ...._..._........_--6 4Nq aura,Y A -Sala il)+1o0 0.0101 a313ANO0 303at3111391 CI,liDION 3N1 JJ37K3 'I ( d y� ♦¢ a9: ♦� 'Y� S ! I• Jy N .m-1tra1Y wiovel3v I; SIlS1171S �lIS utmOaolwtS,1092 21199,nm'iavia2r99'111oN i `- =-- I imp J r' [C 4291710/'r1 N01103a AO 1N3Wt,D 1a34MJLOt4 MIL 30 a31ary(p � — 2 lainua4ON 911 m alalaMC lar9ualON 91140 ATM 1422 9LL I i \0 ,4ll \ )` L -.-j, 9 2 %13 "5."1- wrugaintra NOIidl?J0S3Q 1d�731 IVI ? \\ a1�g@JE\3N^: .r '\ \ ``� a a LLaL-aaa MCP) j A \ \, a n 'MA NOIa30 3NOO —. TN \ Do ..♦ '. , 4, �?.w_. �� v \ w♦�` ..I'i m a r aoi aAaneMe3Nivro istso•td i ; -..-� is l .T_{-1 i , .r _,_ 1 �,„ .0� = NL 31VOS i ; dt� O'\, iy. \i i yr Z u $ 0019.0LL(CM/ v l III �.0 t I I\ I N III ` 1 Ca0•C VTI'WJNjN t6+u14 `i • ' \ I`F__... .ptYc. ,$e _ ,ht 43 fit° `/` 0T .22.01-101.10 G I, fxN , ♦sr'l '� '•mac _? e 6 y s.,p' S£"..az 13�D°°a eus wO+ ;G ry # f•n 6" i 14 ` i Lf e kY ^N WaH1of A7FNN 1 anra I. I I [G1i a19nv '. ``f` 1N4'71lddVM3N110 I I -� `,'‘;.I'-�„^O- ' --- C---j 1r cant aa eJ'� • �� Y� ��_...... ,,.........fir........_fi..'}_;�'..,-_.�� �.._..-- _ od t.2 •�`` - rl 4.7. CITY OF RE ITON ? `/ j.._h K �_..x .._. r_ -. ... --_ ;:.h.c.4...:_..1 a ....__ Ato..... r,.,_ .-..., .� ti ...`:...'-,:?'r;......�........._:.. S �w � of .wlya:'v " St`frl L.itlt 613N N A4,4CW N ' a S JAN 3 0 2001F. _ __- ._.....� .._.__.__,r... BUILDING DIVISION 0 - "`"-- "" ' I YY M '3 9 3Dd 'N Ce SMl 6L 039 b/!MN WI MN NW 1/4 NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP. 23 N,R. 5 E, W.M. FOL.r BRASS 0191 T" 'WPM M. STA,P0, g D.A.PT.'nee:)ton I • ,r E 11 Q N.E. 4TH ST. OI a _—' 12 cuu i J ----__ •1mxnr. xoT.ea,�ev.n Baas ___xi� 1 — B I'T - V. __'_' 1.C4IOOSOOxER'Pa0 \.1 .... '', fUSIITMNBC, I 0,,..T.. LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1 t 1'' 6 _"i4, • ...� _..jz� ..._..... __ . , \ - - 1N N THE 1.,1 N:., ........_r.. rJl__K'�`.. � � � „-'-..__ !-..... .-_ .._.._.__..._ I KIND COUNIY WASMIN M RANGE S EAST. �_�'I`........, r k � � NYnLLAMEflE YpeDUN,CF. QUARTER 0���NORTHWEST QUARTER OF ""'.•. ,. ._�I.:.-..ra ., 72T748 t�: I .. _..I9im, 3 ...t/yp �2 M' I; + �'.. I I�, I IR EOCCPT DIE NORTH 42 FEET S BY DEED RECORDED THEREOF CONVEYED COUNTY FOR ROAD w y v "%IT Caa+FB I I I r=�i \ • I I I " /:: p • Ind -`� I z m IP I T' I'� tttY Imo $N' • N BASIS OF BEARINGS O i Y II ' 1 r \ ..e�.T`` i Yk` 4 '11 t •y,1<I I o 1 AND DESCRIBED N507.21EIBELOTW PER MONUMENTS•CF RENTON H1 MID ORIZONTAL852 NCONTROL D N � tt‘ 8^P�j - i ;� ` ;1. ten. �' 'N' HUMAN PO%15NED NOV.tq 1994 ff w " \ 1I BENCHMARK !"' 1.1 .t • ...% ` •:.`it'�:;� �`` ,i \` j}J.�l*,,____ BENCH MARKS PER CITY OF RENTDN SURVEY NAVO TMEE OANM• �� ; ............._..-....J"""""'""'•--<-....... ....:�i'I�•,,.�`•^a t '\ • '\ I'1!{I9II I PT/IBSZ.]'BRASS ARRFACE DISC N NE1 T.(SE F h U \ �\ I 1]DM ST.)a 145TH AVE S.F. 9 ? +C N L' U i )i y SCALE 1 N = 40' EC.131.7 OR R S.eu METERS) z ` (._ I /_ a. ''• .$" • I , - PT/2103-BROKEN BRASS SURFACE DISC.IN THE NT.SE.128TH ST. a I \i„ .<RO ; n" `r ya�\IJr m a1SBTH AYE s.E -. I / ` • kA `\ .k' ;� hhh I \, EL Sa.9A OR(187.013 METERS) Z .,• \.;° ',ns. , ``, I , ti .. SURVEY NOTES t W i e' NITIVEST MIMS AINEINCCO 1.1-2 ( I ▪ i •' M\ ' A„,,,.., 1• L TIC PURPOSE Or MS NURe19 n 10 PREPARE MOON.NO T IHIY MOM FM • ` N j't'` t-' "� 1t ' ,.� • 1 h____ x 105 ABPMIN.9RIKY W.I..190 9RMY.1'Om09 n10®ix NC DATED ME Ij • " ��, t t'I w \i \5 •; .,t i;S,i f t %IMO .0.20 N Baal IM,ends PAC M.Bu ON.ammm9 NO. O .NaaAP 61010 CaPKT,M9BIOTOL __ 1 \`,r as'' .. ' I ` LEGEND I AM T11I SOLMATKN MOM EN 11R KIP NAe MN OORACIO FROM PAOx _,• . ...i' :Xi* G "• IIOtRX50T MILC.P.A.SUM AI.0 mAPRMDIr NO.MAUL 9ATm AM.,a w .. ,• -., ▪L !^ • y 0, • '/ /I I 0 SANITARY SEMEN MANHOLE San. N NUN..DES YAP O9N Of9O1 Ha Ca0UC10 MO OrODOOMT not tiAR01 !: a"'`r1{x' \ +� \...#µi..../,e I 1 PROM.ON. TTwNnM.MOM M 11 M. MAP a91e�9B BE 1.R1010N1.111E®P�A01 _ .-.. _ . WATER METER . •x ....�...+ •A •'•`•'. ✓�.._.. / I t TOLE 1aroANY IAMN1MUT .*.i.��,B-;Sa:.;�!\'^ , ti: ♦PROM.AREA 9917m.MAW SST Eu]17A A.M. .•..��y� < 91 4O�' �'. • 6 KMfx OIICII MIA T103 fN,M WY EMIT M 11Q SIR. MY 1NaII WINO V 1.. V • \ ••,•� S t la PoN9i POLE 11AOIQ P lILIOERCFRMO U W LOCA INSTALL..MM.WORN AT a10U10 MATE ONLY.102.1.0 NI I I e ` _ I i.' J` ',', • I rl l 1-1 6,6 AM M9Mu OIM WORN AM mm MCN.l iOCATE.MT wY h N. I �. ,_ ^:•.;, ?'1 ROCKERY mum Pam a MOM NOT M.N.SO.9WDROROAO COMM 9AM SIMO1 'a. / /�N^ 1 I N IM1 Q / / "' f I' Y N.M.f TANK MOM PIIPLC MOOR. mn MOON MM.MO DA0f1Y POI M @ �%e`er - t .�[• I YI'-. IK/v Max ICMOx V IO 3 1*` `_ NOJ4 I / / ' 'x f i I<I 1��'�I CONCRETE O I •\ .i,:• ', . T� / I P.N.4•V 3 ' I e I ' .• A TNS Pur2T IRI®1111 N9ax PNT91x IMPROVEMENT COMM.FASINO SCN 9 I T" •4 \ x i 1 Y l�a• I SEPT..11 x00 ALL 91R1E!COO..POMO A9•OIR.KAS NM9101 no \Q L" l 1 , I W I C CEDAR N+ 1 ', TM MM. APR V 1.0. .fA......._.. .._._._....__. '+ .. , ,C- S I 1 • 'Y r.7'i i'.. T.Au asrArR00 ARNP¢T. •\ 1 i I~ \�\•b I I � •^1 !•ml 01 CHERRY pc ^,- __ a MS IS All.TRAMS,SIM. MC 9SN0 MONO=TOTAL STATION + /..•.^ . .--._.... • I \.` I I \ 1 WAS 060!10 MM.MOOAM N✓0 aeTN10C REATIONMPI 001120111C L sy� - .... ` I 1 �\ of COT COTTONWOOD MM.amN¢130-000.DISTANCE 6 llit NNOTRNERSE 03 11 1 IZ.0, ` 90N�RA10 A e.MS MC S.WINK E NW NE Cali TAA M' .r:;......... T r � \ KI.,•.,,5! GNI. i 1 u I I \1w I F FlR I. Q f1• c.d.-3 1.1,. \ .�`' L_ l:I T z�T• A N9 PROMTE Ix1ew 102 N.Y N CONN“.a1 RIN TM SORM, • 1`1,i'I,co ,�,% , ,,I •, "s\ ,�4•,-, lot `` H .HEMLOCK w O �ry ni,ii ,,. ` •.ice' N, M MAPLE t y,. N, ...•.y,q.,...\ .. • I,.. •: I f Y• _. ... PROPOSED EDE P Nl1T F y A.l `� •.1. / I • >✓..� MAPLEWOOD ESTATE Q• ..I K' , fib.,% I°j� X! W I'•.i` /1 �' '''' ,%i! , ,\ ; . (Jx! ' t \mot e to o w .`q,"N +„/ TN \� / , `-\ RENTON k I' — s - CITY O R qO ,AIAM4. i• r 1 ®C�++ • D Ki 1 •+ r I . V." N ,�l 1: yp�� A�F�_T¢m��� � .I .. s:3.......�'•,:* i io� / ,("\, `:t \ \ '^ �'n' ..'-n. raAaRT h �,... �..._.xn?.>_T._._"rx_:.cT�r It i� \\•� '• i K. o Y u ,..:CS. POL'•a l P0.1R CN BBIB'be•.WI <91-:-=L-32Z:57-:*u:'::.t. . ` J AN 3 0 1 - ` ==_- i 200 n P O.OF CCM. `n ' h r • HWrYPC MO TO 2•1. 'I , I $ j I. 1 CONS :A.. I `/{. [�� • - --- O 6 1 . I ' i ,' y�' 'R: I�It6I0IV SHEET OF ® VICINITY MAP 1 1 ._3. ..••• .••. PROJECT NUMBER 00059 • NW 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. I / i. .. .;..---.._.r._..__..._ ..-,;,J-_� .... "N.t.:4TN ._-._... ... 1�.. --._.._...._......__._. SCALE: 1" = 40' IMMO 1..... L` ---� N• ----,'""'Fr- - -",-^'----2/876/Wiiii ...---MViiiii&Kowinjw4).15:7,Yr*,, ,,,1140—.:,.,-'''..--:;:-..R, °.°rfo.7.--1:- • '--...--„,..,,,,,,..,„.•:•:„...:__.:.„_..;• _. ._ _ ..,„......,,,,,,,=...„...„...._•_...„..t.„..........Tt__ . • a . ...- ---., ,,....4...._______, ,c,„ : \ , ,, ,1 , . 4; , '.-. i. '< ' I 1 I \\ OWNER/APPLICANT J'�y 4."E v \\ \ IA , `\��\ - I D DD 8 NANCY JONNSON al04ih H ��77 2 l ;^ \�, \s1 j : . , BENCHMARK 8001 NE A1N STREET °p''�Ar 4" N \ '!k e _ Q 1R;v, .i..!v \ RENTON.MA 98059 0•••• 1 `3,7 \'�� '� £itir,4 ` ._ .I BENCH NARKS PER OTT OF RENTCN WRYLY ON HMI)1988 DATA 1 , • 3 '.- 2,, \ I) O ' A99 §:-i : APPIICAHT: `^ \\.$ ♦\\\ ,.,.._.v._...._ .•` ,11 •. J l Q 'wti I I+( \ PSSTN ST)k t1eTISA SURFACE VE SE DISC.IN 111E NT.NE 41N ST.(SE AYBEf1YU00 TN STREET 47 91t SE IIS LC V ♦ `\` ... \ q�ppYU I<.; RENTON,NA 98059 Z ♦• ♦ \, .. gvov�'`R I�, 1 ;,,,'1 ; EC.AS�.n 011(1]6e1s NETFAs) (253)2)D-8100 la / ♦ -"`-='..'♦.. ""—•4' , .i `nya 4Yu ," L•cc 1 I i 1 PT/2103.BROKEN BRASS SURFACE DISC.C THE CT.S.E 128TH ST. Y\ ♦ \ I &IS5 s4 SE NElERs) PORE DES /ENGINEER/SURVEYOR > cam_• ♦ �_ �� ,' ►�\ f;.•,r,\I._ TIE 4Cos D�N111 AVE N.E.9111E 200 H N ---'-a 411110. 11 � ���at 'I ` ...__ __•••-_ APPROKDIATE LOCATOR OF CONTOURS (42S)e E NA519NGi0N 68007 3 cpp .p (Ass)em-0en s 0. ♦`� 11iv .. II — t' NOT SURVEYED CONTACT:LATE AVID CATION-ZA n e I a Z ` *WI _-'' OAND CATION-EnybRv ���lir IY�I-,+ -__ _ IL " ���•`', .{ om'�` ' •.�i ,♦^..\ KERN J.VANE/REARM-Swveyor RAF Z \'. �I \.: JR \ s0 i--. 1650STATISTICS• �I-"as• MEAosruRBEoµROx.A.TFCRE9-""• CEME\♦ \ 0 TER m&CURB 3 COTTER STRIPPING T.sCO C.V. \C))W ' •--�-•-• EXCAVATOR 4,000 C.V. .O\ \ 1�•.r'• `l TYPICAL ON—SITE ROAD SECT/ON ? �) n-- EYBANNYFNT t,000 L.Y. I '•,r../ ▪ ��\ \ _ I - N.sale t „ Ly e ♦ \ 111 .�., ,\ -' i: Ii,'� [ rR�rsmucnR�Ac nu sxarc4i , .. ,Y ._- -. )(1 EXTEND ROAD LEGEND ORE RANT `T) II± 1Ii 2 ♦\a. ♦ �1.✓/.1 _.'3_ ' . ", lO rtat Man1 .xs• Eau cnsrsve\4 ll. '` ,. •�,L' ) i ( } I^,'-- . EA152VD cnveee/r —�IIyII 5' OR MAINS? —w—RATER UTLITY • 3� € e :{� .A1puaw m.:( 7 !.'(1 K Ili 1,1! ROAD \\8 I� J OM NEW DESOV GRADE '', ♦ W i.ri. II 1 - ....._,II i ;$ ,{ DNFEYCI VA IE pIOI ANO S/pROERJ _.n.;�_COSIg0 CONTOUR ELEVATOR Rf 'W. @. ( ' 1 It j' , } rIi ARa!D PRONDE A SUIIA&E SUB-BOLE ,5'C'ENEVT CCNCREIE SIDEWALK ROCKERY CN •Q1 O V N q �\ l -. 1 \ Iv: MOVE CONCRETE HFRaL CURB De'PICK N DRIYEW.IIS �l �_, \ I \ 1 j\\ .� ♦g: AND CUTTER 4•MICR aaNNaerl Q a SELDOM A-A �\ NE 4171 ST. HALF—STREET IMPROVEMENTS Li obi ..A3 •,f },F" -�\ \ \ - - ♦-'\ `�•,` ._.. NO SCALE 4 T ,ry . ` I Irl - 10. ,if Tp\ N. Aav� d •< Y lAw. a: x W a... .....w ram, \. U y aW .. .1nuE.r \ W \ , c a°0 4 49 , 50 . ' ` 91' i:° 52 g.... < R Rx 00059 NW 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. I r a iE • :__.. ..._.....r.._..... i _ SCALE: 1" _ ip .40'! TH S P. d .! -- .•....•-c........ 1pi.w r — IS' 1 � •a • • awEwa�ucaNr\`.., r\\ \ ; It \ ; i i ,,r BENCHMARK COMM o LID i wrm'»NSON r n '. ; t, tR 4, _ �m�irlo'Ei wa BEAM • 37 \38 • 4 3 _ • Q :" ,`\ DF]1G1 MAIMS PER CRT OF FEHTCN&MET CH HAW IS MI DA LA I 1`'^•,k'. \ O FT..•]•ERASE tUPBACE DEC.Al THE M.IM ATLI M.ME.EETH PoCEA•�E�p1 TM E�rIV.'LT II .? 't . Q ,'``i !G MAXI OR(EMU PETERS) Id]TTOL WA MOSS Z OM/TIa-EIOC \ ` t_•• `'•� ♦\ .-`-Q'• ' i i %TN OAK erele�a�H eRme sued¢DIM t�nz Kr.eE.ven+eT.. PLMC�ER/ENGINEER/SURVETOR a i ; _1: \\ \�--- \ '2.` ,. \��'� \\ ` i EL EAL94 oR 4R.lOD rL'TCREI raa DEEl4l PlC' Y 6• > • A]PJ•IAETH AVE NE WRE]00 3p \ \,\ \ j ..'�,_ `• `, • _... ^v::EN@.uYd111GTW Y0ol J R " O , .E Nr,3R.1, \ ,..0 (A]E1 EEE.lET m (/ .; a\\ 'i 1 I • CQlTACT.DAVIDGE-rgOr� $ U ..---7- 1 ] �. ••Y'j ``� \�• `YS' [\ \v6- ♦3 \ : IQVN 1 vNIDERZCi7DEH•8vr"Na `d§ ? . a0. SITE $ \ \... \ ��. ;�. STATISTICS ...e.......... '.j-__�...._._..\'� ' • B !` 1 •'S•� i `\ AMA DIE MEED APP...41 AGREE Nu M1Z'U t< \ .;5 \ tATIS 39 4,0 `,,4..... I • „0 ;` $:•t Bi i IF, LEGEND Arr mx PAR wnroe n u_ �•\ \ \\ -, •,•y, <, •°i 7;. \ �t • ;�'---'- #a mummer LmRe rs aEAlew ETR,rrea IMO CM. (Mk. ^: ♦ ..•-- I'ytri .' excAvarla+ A.000 Gr. W •` I„A, ,\'� Y>, ••- \ .,\ ,'14 ' 1-1 \ !I'mMq�Hf 4GC0 GT. U -- ` \ •t j'- ', r �:` ` �..,\✓\.ti"..•.<_.7\Zt;'t', '� TREE LEGEND r♦ \ 'r...4�.. 1•~ i A ALDER \ ATLE 41 v.42 '+i.. ', 1 '! .._ 14s`; •c!: C CEDAR h Z 174 Q. NCA CLEIENT 41 QI , . 1 '+ 3 i; 14 Car COTTCNtGCD —.P: t _spy }: , . i I' ?..,', I}I: t i DEC DEGOQIE j: .r .•' I ii Z Q e. 0 • � ♦ H, �, 1 • Sir • i .\ �'1:< '• -• L • LARG! R . i1 . . f i _ r\M M MAPLE I\ : •. ♦ 13 •._ TWA MN ALDER W Q _.._ —4Di v i / $. ifi e\ \\ 11\;. ...ti: 1 a'! \ ,-..... 1WF NM FIR fa CI > \\ ♦`.S ti t iifri Id, LAt 2 .d �'i 17\ w 45 46 :' \ \,\ crsse I \ F ai.� k'(-�: •,. \ \ !:..._... ? \......__ we '.-7 ''. 1 \\:.,.^ \ I us.x ..\ w 47 4F3 ° . • ;`49 ; 50 + ,,t • • < w c ' i1 ` '15 5. •♦j} SHEET Q OF f, 2 1 I: \ PROJECT aEA _ F 0006a .. , .. . . , 0 • r... .. 9 : E 128th SO (.1 4114 sT R15 E . , __ , i____ . ;Al"Z__.-.61ra . . . .. I . : - 0. . • R7-5 *. • . • 1 . . . ' . . ... .. . : 7 . ---1 4 rm, Ez SE 132nd St. - , 1 • .... • I • • •e - -=4 nr4 "ci 3 > cq .= R-5 ; Z. • . r4 . co E . 6 . .4. e4 R-8 it . , SI • -=%'II cA, i ti • ' co . 11 M • ; 11 • k Lo 1 : I 0 , SE 136th St, ; • : Z • 1 • • . 0 : ** - i • • i se . ' SE "137th Pl. - m) • N 1 1 §u.38t jji P1. - • SE 138th ci9 .S,.F.J39th P1. I . • . ISE 139th -%(1) . 9 SE 140th Pl: .-F, co Lo 0 • .• --', . : - - H • j Vaa • 9.. :. : • - :- ' - : • . • . . ._ _ SE 142nd St. ": . ._ . .4 .4 CO CD • - ;SE 143rd O. ...S_E_SR_Ifilid PI, 0 . 1 U 144th: St.E 145th P1. SEc444th I• - 1 . j C " 417/„„ • _., I opt..) t 14 6' 114800 - F7 . *0 ZONING rel gic r P/B/PW TICMCCAL SWIM 14 T23I•T R5E W 1/2 ,.•,„,!)- 1=2/99 V)401tist1r 6. ..... -,,y_ •,:.....:,•-:• ••,-,../Y,!7.:-.:'. • . :: • - ::::•:-:;-:•;-:•.: •:::;-:',"''''',".--:--7 tr'''''•"'•'••• ''• '' • •.• • - , ••-••." .--- • . . •••.. . • . . ..'•• '.•. -' '.1••••:„ •.:I•, •••:.... . ......• . • ••*, ...• • .: c•.••••-.••••••: s: •::. .•••:•:.?••• . . ',, •• •$-;•...:-••••••:'•• ••;:•'.••,• ' . ':. ' ../.......:.' ".: . ..1....:.ZONING:'-......MAP-:..BOOK.-.:-:-: - iri ?',.. . • tia-AWIE . .. ' . .,W . %-nr,- i-.3:1:41&:6. ' •" ri 1.--••' •-•:-•-• ••• • A. . '..:.'.15i,i.•;.-- ::::::4Eg;'4,--•••••-4.) •74•14k ..- .tP - ;:-:: 4.3:s.i....;M Y ..7:YFCA / .'7-,.'7--"-"'”••• *. 1 ‘ :„._,..,. !... ,. .N. • -.-: . pi. • ,,g, • • • .. . • mi iz-fg-:-.:46.:•iu,;-?.-11, ` $44, 41-:---------- --44*, i i :.• ' . . • . : 1 t Ilgit''''I Vat'-I A- .-, _', f.. ,-ii q*:::::::i.:!Jr.- . -... • •: , ' :.- 1‘,-yir: ake....c.: • -i -.. • : .. . ..,,,,,., ..........,...... ,.... a, .. tow, • . ,;„ii . ,,, 26.724N R5E • . . . .• • ' • . • • • .2 - 'ESSEE,E,EkAtitA.::E. ,---..-Ek-:' , , ..,;-•'.'-EEE1::0.4 i; 4 1 •.. „..,,,,,.,.......,„:„.,..........„.:,..,.....„,:,,.:,..„:„.„,..,. , •• , ,,„...,,:::::„.„..,:•. :• , . .,. , ,.„,• -:•.•;••• .,,N,..,.4, 5.3":kifei.W.05:iff4S-SxkOkt..--;:•.._, 0,,E:EsiKggfre,,,Isili ,, , •..: :.. ' '11r4.4-, 41 itir 0...,i,,::::,-,.,!,...;:., (....„,:::,z.„:1.--;w„,,,t..„,;„,,,,.. ., .:As.,,,,,,., ‘ ...... . , ,N . .....:.. -.. 111::).:Ite as.,e-r.-45:43,4;;g- -Eii.4.5s7:ft ifik",, r-ON,vi! -• •--l't''''Iri' -41. ' C 7... .._01::_„...31,171-:::IfEi:„..,,:i....1,4.,.,,,„,_.-iii.:.......&g. :,,•,-.,.?..g..„,„._.• ,i. - .,..- •r• ._,. ,,,,... , . .- • . ff-tif.ww,i,r.Ntzete.: :i. : ..,.-4ftx".-" 0-5,i,t,;.M4`-ibillii Klg,___.. ,4411114t,,, - ( .,..It•ii,'.e4t,M-i,.,: . ..... --474:k4s t4-:?". -:-...,r4-,'-'',...-(4.-tq':111i ._ '4:441ftai."'atIMEL.,-Notii:L..."-__ •11Q4N R5E .•- . - • 117,11/1121.K'\V:,-,T..,-=:f-zEsm-E-*,-,---?!:-7.--.-itr.°tf-,:.-§ww,-Tipot aapir7lif--- =c -ki ;0 .,dEnot.,,,- Nc.:...,..„.:F.RM-::-.i:e•M:.:.:'.:'L:.-_:_.::_--.:.:EirMlig;;;:p3 ,g ilinp leF;i ''.6 1 5,_ F t"'-1, . .' . .. ittilkii illti. _ Aiip figItt-f;:k:hi PJ-1.aTxt, m - ra '1"i . •C'L - •-•' - '' 'b. • k . .NW I riki tit'ti" -.t-))•: 1.:**-:-K..i irig;•••:;:a: AO' 'tt"?.1 . ' ' • ''. ii 4 1:4.4Z• ...._...,h,,...,1 6,,ix,,,,,a-,-,,,,.k, .-ivi,••••L.,...:4..-.4:-...:im: ,,,or,t,lit ,... - . .t...r-,,,,, ,..1 k .06.2....:.,?_InA 1 ,,,,.. :-.8,-„,AN,>.„••:1_,,•. „:„.•,..:.iwi, . DTI, .1'li /:t 4 ' :: ' esWiejt ti iil •,,. 4:3).!•li\11.0fts-WAkaed.›. `-' ":'k.:' A -"'. • ' Eohai•=-• ..,R5 Aiwa 2 T23.-N-AE . .111Molo• S'ir-4,1111M_MTV.-Wr PM'. ..,„kir,,...„....,......... 4:•..-.1 ip, • •Imitirm.R.4440.4* um ,_ 4 \ i \,, ;,.. „..1,f,t-• : r - - 0 ., -1 I •OUID....• th , - . .• . I .A• Lf---41411 „iNtr• magi:4'1, \ • • , -....:Kliti4zk.#11111 Nr..111.111011*''' :::tc 'A ,' - ,,,4i 11, I.---1-,'f-...3."-• litti•.'....... i . -- . . .• .• IliWtt ).,14,1„vitt rgElf-s- ...ia -, 1- A** '-.4*- 4- I. .. ,,i,it•,:-., .; , • - 1 : • -.•. A...1.A . _ ita,„11,, L. , _ , , ,. .ni. ir ;,-.. iptii ,.. V4 saigi 11 •-,• • Ei ort , 'SI tr. 1 • -----1, ,....-."g-..- 4r ., ',I*: viaLqui \winiA., i.:1- .= ' .tti .41 .... kij r61125E . .. Iror•-'" -"'llin li ' . e,- .I L., \rii Tr,w/ , e i ' Pa -'26 Rfkltmlh',Cr itiu•-,4i- • ,3-fo 111 7 FriNfill • TT • ,../.• .,,,ita ---- -,- ..10.1k..f.s ri _ - 1•%11441,'," : . . _Aro '* .•• 5.. •..trii,,,,teiLtAt .. •• . . .tiz,%tL ,ti . 7 ..., itp.,..„.4_404.Jailli•iwt, . .. , . _:,.. lie .. ..K. .0,1 . .. I. . },7,,,-7.• II . .4w. „,.:r, ..kfroit %II 140,..v___.. ,p .• • . . .. . ifilliz•LIM .1,,.. ". i , Oa ,ICIJki A.,ti - itft.i;gilz • • - -04ild '--t-i,• - • .. • : • . ' . .• .. . •••::' . .141,111a1 , h--'4r- 1 r,. .:.-1,1F4.1• f.:-‘t - 371 --'''. .•: -:81 .41alrai; liq % :3/05• '. .....;_..e-.,,,,,......ie.... ,: .. „ , „ , • . • ,&, • •.:. _ ..- \__-" •• • .% : .:. PO ..'• c-....,,,,, ..,'•.-•••1111/4, • .. , -_, , ...„4„ I ''' ' , Wit' 7iikl 41: ".\ '•Ist:" '-' i*,0:4 . ' .-. 1 .. • 1, '' _'1'•1 11. .1.1PL'. tfi ,l-i!oMg-,-a_40ir6m. i_gaikitaewt1.i t'-A'f f-,4.r1l i\'• -.Nio.,•r,:,,•r4,,•,1i-,7:1•...,. •',iitNie.,.,iks,.,fi,it7,.„Ke4-,-4 i`,-.1.,'-••,,• '. ...•1 . '' • 4i - T23NR •• -2:3_.T it 2.•3 NR-. 5'E.•-'• • 2ri_i - 1.vi.-z--.;.,1/2= ,-.,- 4. .821 -.--' • E • . • , ,A.i ,, - .. • , -- • ,, ._. 0 li / I' ' I. g k".\' el n.• ii51:_. '?..' V. . I ..... S..1 .. ....,„,p, i s.' •I .--I- '1 •' 1. • - .1-.1, 4- \ittie$214 .7*. ';'-'.' . 'Vt.,: 'A'.: .. , k. .. - _ i ir , r. . ••,, ;, ,_ . • : os, ..1,711tth . ..ric.y..t,. ,....::„ 0..., n... . _ •. w • • itioamma ../ : - "C . - '... .4' %)./- .' ...1.--- ' '`e_..E • 20 '') 25 • •*:1 '.'I \\ lit"'(1>511 . r.:: ; I il!fil-.;111#fit - 11• ; . ...'.. flp511.A...„, ;11„:„....8t0":14 8, . • . - . . r r r.1'-'l.,7 r.'"r 7 r r r r ' I . ., .;.r r4 r • ) r i .,. ..., . . C '" - . • r '•' :7.. ' iza!.24 ''''' - - 11'..-/- .. .__ • ,-: - • . • • ..Li ' It''' . ' • i-41 I-1u. ' . *, .. • ii,- wii`rde- 3N'. . •411' .K 3 ' " E A ';' ' • ‘'! r 3N- E.. ' 35 T23N :K.:::: 36 .... • . •. : :. •: ..:- ; :••..:•.•.-"•:•-.1•-r"a,•.7dl l7:i-='.•..-4.•.11i 11.• i9i1111"11 61' -m:•u••m.m i mm...-6..•.. 0ar- .--0'Im1•m toA.I'•s mm':o11[4i2av11111 eM-.r p _ tr ..•• -,•••,!' ', '...R• C :833 7Mt.E-:_;-_ 8 • • - • ... 1 . MN 1 S 2T22NR54 .i...i.i .... ...'..;'....;...i.' •• ::" -:'::." . .• - • . • • . . ... ;... .. •7:'. . ..• '• • . '. '''' '•":' • ..-• 1-1 Resource Conservstion•• •:.'• --••.• . ..1-1 Convenience Commercial (P) Publicly Owned.,.--..•.:-' - ..•:• .. •• • ':-:::.•'.::.,,...'.':i:.*: . . :.•-•. .: -.:. ''''.. C=1 Residential I:du/se:H. • -:.•: . . ••' :.. 1-1 center Neighborhood :.....•,-. •. .,-. . Renton City Limits .... • :: • PAGE# Residential 5 du/ac Center 77.Adjacent City Limits Residential 8 du/ac Center Downtown' • • ' -• - i (Grey Text) Presence ':• ••.". SECTribianAme ••• •'-. •• • • 1-1:Resideniial Manufacture('Homes .::.,.... '. ,....'..-I-1 Center OlTiceRcaideitUel:••• • .ee. Autornall District ElCommercial Arterial .., ..... -..... Automat' District . .. . . ni Commercial Office : ••!:For additional regulaUons In overlay districts • •. . • ..:'.' '• •"...." not amen on this map. please see 1111C 4-3..:::. ••••• •• • Y.••• •:••., ::•'.::.::: • an Residential Multi-Family Infill •;:•::... • ..-::.: 1 Di I Indust?' 7 Heavy ..;• i • '. ••::.• . ..... - M •••• ' •• I-I Residential Multi-FamilyNeigittmitioodledeteti IIIN41.10ustaietb Medium . PAGE ... .. w ...•.. -, . ' fe ......' 1:::::::.;:•:..... 1-I ResidentialTiulti-FaMtly Suburban Center•••.`,/ liajpillistrial - Light .:::..,.• ......,:.;:,.: . ,..: : .:::,,,..„:,•..y.,I-I Residential Multi-Family Urban Center Public. Use. . : . . . .. .. . ..; • - CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-00-150,PP,ECF APPLICANT: Amberwood, LLC. PROJECT NAME: AMBERWOOD PRELIMINARY PLAT DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has proposed subdividing a 199,505 sq. ft. (4.58 A) property, by means of the Preliminary Plat process, into 19 lots suitable for detached, single-family residences. An existing house and out-buildings woul� be removed. Access would be from NE 4th Street to the north, via Rosario Avenue NE, and an extension of NE 3 Court to the west. Environmental review is required and a public hearing before the city of Renton Hearing Examiner. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 6001 NE 4th Street LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM January 2, 2001. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8- 11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)- 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: December 18, 2000 DATE OF DECISION: December 12, 2000 SIGNATURES: a , (!j 40 6✓e��j 2)vt i ii4-e✓n7 6t frl l ZA /UC) G • egg Zimmerman,Administrator // DATE Department of Planning/Building/Public Works '\., ex...........___ (c,e,t.e.,es (0Z/7., )C Shepherd, A ministfator JiDATE Cghimunity Services ti 7:-\,4, feie ( / (Zl©o Le heeler, Fire Chi DATE Renton Fire Department dnsmsig r CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-00-150,PP,ECF APPLICANT: Amberwood, LLC. PROJECT NAME: AMBERWOOD PRELIMINARY PLAT DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has proposed subdividing a 199,505 sq. ft. (4.58 A) property, by means of the Preliminary Plat process, into 19 lots suitable for detached, singltg-family residences. An existing house and out-buildings would be remgved. Access would be from NE 4 Street to the north, via Rosario Avenue NE, and an extension of NE 3` Court to the west. Environmental review is required and a public hearing before the city of Renton Hearing Examiner. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 6001 NE 4th Street MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The project shall comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). 2. A silt fence shall be installed along the downslope perimeter of the area that is to be disturbed. The silt fence shall be in place before clearing and grading is initiated, and shall be constructed in conformance with the specifications presented in the KCSWDM. 3. Shallow drainage swales shall be constructed in intercept surface water flow and route the flow away from the construction area to a stabilized discharge point. Vegetation growth shall be established in the ditch by seeding or placing sod. Depending on site grades, it may be necessary to line the ditch with rock to protect the ditch from erosion and to reduce flow rates. The design and construction of drainage swales shall conform the specifications presented in the most recent KCSWDM. 4. The project contractor shall perform daily review and maintenance of all erosion and sedimentation control measures at the site during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. 5. Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation shall be submitted by the project Engineer of Record to the Public Works Inspector for the construction of the civil improvements of the plat. Certification of the installation, maintenance, and proper removal of the erosion control facilities shall be required prior to recording of the plat. 6. The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee at the rate of $75.00 per each new average weekday trip attributable to the project, estimated to be 9.55 average weekday trips per new residence. The Transportation Mitigation Fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. 7. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $488.00 per each new single family residential lot created by the proposed plat. The fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. 8. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee at the rate of $530.76 per each new single family residential lot. The fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. 9. The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the geotechnical engineers, Terra Associates, Inc., in their report, dated September 15, 2000. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-00-150,PP,ECF APPLICANT: Amberwood, LLC. PROJECT NAME: AMBERWOOD PRELIMINARY PLAT DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has proposed subdividing a 199,505 sq.ft. (4.58 A) property, by means of the Preliminary Plat process, into 19 lots suitable for detached, single-family residences. An existing house and out-buildings would be remgved. Access would be from NE 4 Street to the north, via Rosario Avenue NE, and an extension of NE 3` Court to the west. Environmental review is required and a public hearing before the city of Renton Hearing Examiner. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 6001 NE 4th Street Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Plan Review—Sanitary Sewer 1. A sewer cleanout will need to be located five feet out from buildings. 2. Separate side sewers will be required for each parcel (no dual sewers). Side sewer lines must have a 2 percent slope. 3. All utility plans must comply with the City of Renton Drafting Standards. 4. Show finished floor elevations on the sewer construction plan sheet. 5. The vertical profile of the sewer main will be required. 6. The project will be required to extend the sanitary sewer main from the Maplewood Estates Plat to serve this plat. 7. Side sewer stubs to each lot in the plat will be required at a cost of$60 each. 8. Any new sewer mains are to be separated from water lines by a minimum of 10 feet. There is a 7.5 foot minimum separation from other utilities. 9. Sewer Development Charges of$760.00 per single family residence will be required for this plat. The fee for this 19 lot project would be $14,440.00. There is no credit given for existing houses. This fee must be paid prior to issuance of the construction permit for the preliminary plat. 10. An additional charge will be assessed for the East Renton Interceptor Special Assessment District No. 9204 (City of Renton Ordinance no.4362, September 2, 1992). The amount will be determined later. Plan Review—Water 1. The project would be served by King County Water District No 90. Amberwood Preliminary Plat - LUA-00-150,PP,ECF Advisory Notes (continued) Page 2 of 4 Plan Review—Stormwater Drainage 1. Drawings submitted to the City of Renton are to be on 22 inch x 34 inch sheets. 2. Before any construction or development activity occurs, a pre-construction meeting must be held with the City of Renton Development Services Division, Construction Services (425-277-5570). 3. The City of Renton retains the right to restrict the timing of land clearing and tree cutting activities to specific dates and/or seasons when such restrictions may be necessary for the public health, safety, and welfare, or for the protection of the environment. 4. Surface Water System Development charges of$525 per new single family residence will be required for this plat. No credit is given for existing houses. The fee for this 19 lot project would be $9,975.00. This fee must be paid prior to issuance of the construction permit for the preliminary plat. Plan Review—Transportation and Street Improvements 1. The minimum right-of-way for Rosario Ave NE is 35 feet. An additional 5 feet will be required to be dedicated. 2. The half cul-de-sac must be relocated to the south of the right-of-way, to provide access for lots 18 and 19. 3. Until such time that the half cul-de-sac is reconfigured as a full cul-de-sac, a 45' extension to the west, for a hammerhead turn around,will be required. 4. The half street(Rosario Avenue NE), half cul-de-sac, private access road and hammerhead turnaround must be signed and striped for"No Parking." 5. Because the plat plan indicates there are more than 4 lots not abutting a public street(lots 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17), a modification from street standards must be requested and approved, or one lot eliminated,or the plan reconfigured. 6. An approved hammerhead turnaround will be required at lots 15 and 16 at the terminus of the 26' private access road. 7. All electrical and communication facilities to be underground behind the sidewalk. If right-of-way space is not available then in a utility easement. 8. Street lighting is required to meet City standards. The street lighting conduit to be located under the sidewalk. 9. The minimum right-of-way width is 42 feet(modified from street standard width of 50 feet). 10. The cul-de-sac is required to have a minimum pavement radius of 45 feet and right-of-way radius of 50 feet. 11. A 5 foot sidewalk at the curb is required inside the plat. A 6 foot sidewalk on NE 4th St is required. 12. Payment of a Transportation Mitigation fee of$75 per new average weekday trip, estimated at 9.55 new trips per single family lot,will be required prior to recording of the plat. It has been estimated that this 19 lot plat(credit would be given for the existing house)would result in approximately 171.9 additional average(weekday)trips. The Transportation Mitigation Fee would be $12,892.50. Plan Review—General 1. All required utility, drainage, and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a registered Civil Engineer. 2. The construction permit application(s) must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. Amberwood Preliminary Plat . LUA-00-150,PP,ECF Advisory Notes (continued) Page 3 of 4 3. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5 percent of the first$100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4 percent of anything over$100,000, but less than $200,000, and 3 percent of anything over$200,000. Half of this fee must be paid upon application for construction permits (preliminary plat improvements), and the remainder when the construction permit is issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. Parks Department Review 1. Payment of a Parks Mitigation fee of$530.76 for each new single family lot will be required prior to recording of the plat. Credit would be given for the existing house. Building Department Review 1. Demolition permits will be required. 2. Any Underground Storage Tanks (UST) must be removed by a licensed contractor according to State of Washington UST regulations. Fire Prevention Department Review 1. A fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single family structures. If the building square footage exceeds 3600 square feet in area, the minimum fire flow increases to 1500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structure. 2. The applicant shall provide field-tested certification, from King County Water District 90, that a fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow is located within 300 feet of all new single family structures. Certification shall be provided prior to recording of the plat. 3. Houses located on deadend streets more than 500 feet in length must be sprinklered. 4. A Fire Mitigation fee of $488 is required for all new single family lots. Payment is required prior to recording of the plat. Property Services Department Review 1. Comments will be provided under separate cover. Development Services Department Review 1. The site is designated Residential Single Family in the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The property is zoned Residential 5 (R-5). 3. There is no minimum density in the R-5 Zone, The maximum density, however, is 5.0 dwelling units per net acre(du/a). 4. The minimum lot size in the R-5 Zone is 7,200 sf, with minimum width of 50 for interior lots and 60 for corner lots. The minimum permitted lot depth is 65 feet. Lot dimensions must be shown on the final site plan demonstrating,that all lots meet these minimums. 5. Heights of buildings in the R-5 Zone are limited to 2 stories, or 30 feet. Amberwood Preliminary PIat, LUA-00-150,PP,ECF Advisory Notes (continued) Page 4 of 4 6. Required front setbacks in the R-5 Zone are 15 feet for houses and 20 feet for attached garages which access from the new streets; 20 foot rear yard setbacks; 5 foot side yard setbacks for interior lots and 15 feet sideyard setbacks for corner lots. All setbacks are minimums. Lots 25 and 28, which are corner lots, do not appear to have adequate side yard setbacks and must be adjusted accordingly. Setback dimensions should be shown on the construction drawings, but setback lines must be removed prior to recording the final plat. 7. The maximum building coverage in the R-5 Zone is 50 percent for lots 5,000 sf and less and 35 percent or 2500 sf for lots larger than 5,000 sf. 8. The property is within the Issaquah School District. Payment of school impact fees to the Issaquah School District would be a condition of plat approval. 9. Retaining walls in excess of four(4)feet require engineered drawings and a separate building permit. 10. The grading plan indicates grading is proposed off-site on properties located to the west and south. The applicant is reminded that all grading for the proposed project must occur within the boundaries of the property, unless easements are obtained from abutting property owners. 11. Construction easements obtained from abutting property owners may be necessary prior to construction of retaining walls on or near property lines. These agreements must include protection measures for (or permission to potentially damage or remove) trees located on abutting properties within 20 feet of the property line. 13. The applicant will be required to draft and record a maintenance agreement or establish a Homeowners' Association for the maintenance of all common improvements (access and utility easements, rights-of-way, and stormwater facilities). A draft of the document shall be submitted to the City of Renton for review and approval by the City Attorney prior to the recording of the preliminary plat. 14. A Forest Practices Permit, obtainable from the Department of Natural Resources, will be required prior to removal of existing trees. 15. The applicant must contact Paul Alexander of the King County Department of Transportation, Metro Transportation, Meto Transit Route Facilities at 206-684-1599, regarding Metro's requirements for a transit stop on NE 4-Street. 16. Performance Standards for Land Development Permits (RMC 4-4-130K), including "Protection Measures During Construction" (RMC 4-4-130K7) relating to trees, shall be followed by the applicant. The applicant shall adhere to the definition of"tree" a found in RMC 4-11-200, "drip line" as found in RMC 4-11-040, and the measurement of trees as found in RMC 4-11-030. VI City of Rentt.., Department of Planning/Building/Public Wo;n.. ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Co v\s-f -Lc.h \ Son/t(fA COMMENTS DUE: 12/1/00 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-150,PP,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 11/17/00 APPLICANT: Steven Beck PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth Higgins PROJECT TITLE: Amberwood Preliminary Plat WORK ORDER NO: 78756 0/4. LOCATION: 6001 NE 4th Street N. • SITE AREA: 199,505.6 sf(4.58 acres) I BUILDING AREA(gross): elk, k j°e 4pr}, SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has proposed subdividing a 199,505 square foot(4.58 A)property, by ns of tl /�� Preliminary Plat process, into 19 lots suitable for detached, single-family residences. An existing house and out-builds woulcc((t7� removed. Access would be from NE 4 Street to the north, via Rosario Avenue NE, and an extension of NE 3`d Court to evest. Environmental review is required and a public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner. °j0A, A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS A /sue t e C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additi al information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Sig re of Director, Aut orized Representative Date Routing Rev.10193 A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS "It is anticipated that the proposed development would generate future residents that would utilize existing City park and recreation facilities and programs. The City has adopted a Parks Mitigation Fee of$530.76 per each new single family lot to address these potential impacts." • City of k...,L.., Department of Planning/Building/Public v...,..s ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMVAUSt . SetA J, COMMENTS DUE: 12/1/00 c, APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-150,PP,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 11/17/00 APPLICANT: Steven Beck PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth Higgins PROJECT TITLE: Amberwood Preliminary Plat WORK ORDER NO: 78756 .,. LOCATION: 6001 NE 4th Street SITE AREA: 199,505.6 sf(4.58 acres) I BUILDING AREA(gross): Z - '•, m SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has proposed subdividing a 199,505 square foot(4.58 A) property/by means of the Preliminary Plat process, into 19 lots suitable for detached, single-family residences. An existing house and out-buildings would be removed. Access would be from NE 4 Street to the north, via Rosario Avenue NE, and an extension of NE 3`d Court to the west. Environmental review is required and a public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic./Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet iz„ ,,aertohd ...y/f B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS ta/a-- /2,0 c/(4/7y — /0 ? 16.° C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ‘,1,//11/1k a/l.e- 120 Avitiy ILO We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 4(064tel§156?i711,/4 // ,7 Si ature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routing P Rev.1 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department:Water Comments Due: 12/1/00 Application No.: LUA-00-150,PP,ECF Date Circulated:11/17/00 Applicant: Steven Beck Project Manager:Elizabeth Higgins Project Title: Amberwood Preliminary Plat Work Order No: 78756 Location: 6001 NE 4th St. Site Area: 199,506.6 sf(4.58 acres) Building Area(gross): A.Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments No comment. B.Policy-Related Comments No comment. C. Code-Related Comments The site will be served by King County Water District#90. Plans will be required per City of Renton Standards and will need signature approval by City staff for construction permits. /f- o�°.-e-r i'L /1-2 8._0 0 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Lual5Oplb City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL&DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department:Surface/Wastewater Comments Due: 12/1/00 Application No.: LUA-00-150,PP,ECF Date Circulated:11/17/00 Applicant: Steven Beck Project Manager:Elizabeth Higgins Project Title: Amberwood Preliminary Plat Work Order No: 78756 Location: 6001 NE 4th St. Site Area: 199,506.6 sf(4.58 acres) Building Area(gross): A.Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code)Comments No comment. B.Policy-Related Comments No comment. C. Code-Related Comments Surface Water: The drainage plans and temporary erosion/sedimentation plans shall be in accordance with the KCSWDM as adopted by the City of Renton. Surface water(SDC) fees of$525/single family lot will be required. Wastewater: The site will be required to extend the sanitary sewer main from the Maplewood Estates Plat to serve this plat. Sidesewer stubs to each lot in the plat will be required at a cost of$60/each. East Renton Interceptor sewer charge (SAD) fees will be required. East Renton Interceptor extension latecomer fees will be required. Wastewater(SDC) fees of$760/single family lot will be required. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Lua 150pla • City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL&DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET • Reviewing Department:Surface/Wastewater Comments Due: 12/1/00 Application No.:LUA-00-150,PP,ECF Date Circulated:11/17/00 Applicant: StevelLBeek Project Manager:Elizabeth Higgins. Project Title. Amber,�yigary Plat Work Order No: 78756 Location: 600 1 Nt;4 St. Site Area: 199,506.6 sf(4.58 acres) Building Area(gross): A.Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code)Comments No comment. B.Policy-Related Comments No comment. GtiNJt � ^ C. Code-Related Comments (-1.1 Surface Water: ' ITAJAM(1 The drainage plans an temporary erosion/sedimentation plans shall be in accordance with the KCSWDM as ado to the Cit of Renton. Surface water(SDC) fees of$525/single family lot will be required. Wastewater: The site will be required to extend the sanitary sewer main from the Maplewood Estates Plat to serve this plat. Sidesewer stubs to each lot in the plat will be required at a cost of$60/each. East Renton Interceptor sewer charge.(SAD) fees will be required. East Renton Interceptor extension latecomer fees wine required: Wastewater(SDC)fees of$760/single family lot will be required. P -(a //—Z8—00 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Lua15Op1a OI- dN-' ---- -- FOG LINE EDGE OF CONCRETE'OAD to — - - - USW FIBER I' I ei R_ • ----' --- rn • - -- LP 60 b� -A • —- ---• �- tn t--fi III 71:11 I m OF' •1II .I I I \ � I ._-_ JI � f e I13Qr N I in I I•` o z � •.0• EBAR r 1I\\ORNER r- 384-5 i Zm 0 '0-o--- 4r o � - _1 E z NZoE ry6Sp4 Iika; II l3Tl s �' • -fy . iN N1J I NI J z 1-1 zI> I zi •E I w z . 'c I> f a I \ v., h� I< 1 Na i0 1' SF. o I 1 645s80p. 16 =8 . I� xi .1,.? II I•\d 1" 1I -a-,- 1 I I 1\ass % s I � ' 48 1 1 A xL _ L_ss� J a n60 60 is 11 406._ 9 • . 1281 — I I W w i. P I I E I .\ iammmni,Ne `E 6. 96Q.� ry, c‘i \m ,�1 . p I \r• rj —� r-- --- -a- _ P 11ryEe rn 1 o I sp2 ,yE � •^; \1I m`` � j LEI b •`•, •\ 1 I I ! I—x—x. �,E try 0 0 o ° t I .,ryE es a b I 9 40 � SO 6 IQ • I k`t I P, - ---- 12 64 SF. r 2 g Io p- -•�1.2----- WE. 1 E •R P A204 Of. 9 12 SF.p,; I r 1E �I • 1 D I • 1 _ rye ery I I mo • o o�° II I .LOE �l P I so< J�r� 11 I -� • x •`4 E-J L --_—:�b_-T \ •t • P ---.J '� 1 s$ I I ti�, � y 1I 1 \fit �6E •�0 • a <1. .I 1243 fS E I �ww��y/(�'SE I I I... 60 E E r.y0 E .E E ' 0 i,s' r'2\p 1 I 1 . • 1®t --- - 6 l E• C.,' 60 E a m e• •� •ti, 98v 4• •� 1 `I • P I o 4214 Ik`gxl� k.5 W y I = 1805 SA i.\0Et i y 7+Y'� . 1 i 11 // ,6.I •°•y j>f `� 1248 / o < m `^l izo—�-- :1 HOUS I / J • • `of I 1 486 E 1 w v" I, --1-- J \ 484 laJ F�8 I I ry mryo �I 8 Ib SF.Ti 13 1 x I I T • •rye I I \`—- imI •I 11 Nei"! I I \`\ •P mum I XI 11 6'ACCESS <1. .,E i•y0 I x •'• • I J / tto...p 10III �•'_ T RYA ® I CAR ORT'' GARA �a w •• , I O L-__ P E I I .I+•�• ri0- ll-4 SF.I E.E,E11\ ��_ 120 � I L_ I 26' • S$NTIL 0m 1\ CZ 44 P j ,� • • �' 9z Ida' �` �•��, - 1• �P l�o •{• 490 m - �/� #ti• l"' SR s� I r-- - -- 1 J. CIE\\ _��.� .- f` I 1 I ��y� 11 (�6'�Z ( t 1 - I I• • 1 c'� \� ‘J� n - h�- r GARAGEI,I6 �: ryaE I w L3 \ �- I. L —478—�• f ®rya` I SF // 'I I 9341118E NPcca \ 4Z8(., `ELF-- -- \ir '�8 / I.-I� 4gs c W S �� V(/ lr uT ITT �\ /? 1 I , j 1 1 \�a�1 \, ,-,,,),“--� I U ...__.„ 1 j ,,,,Di 0 -. ,,, �0 4S2 v \ 0 • / 81 . . T‘i co-- wry')I V h 46 .TDRAINAGE GT A ����,__� 4�lA 1 1� o TRACT > , �v -- s-, � �P �s 9J86 8F. L v v�„�l\v m Y`^ 476 ' ',°' e tiry ° r 9621 8F. I vle < \ E� 1 I Li 0 4744 \ 160 L \ „•AFPAP .. 8$`16'i 6„ Wf484----- 9�:ri6—.rnr''v R� \<--- • City of Renk..1 Department of Planning/Building/Public-vvo,.,; ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEE REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Vo �� De&iel0FA A. COMMENTS DUE: 12/1/00 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-150,PP,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 11/17/00 APPLICANT: Steven Beck PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth Hi gin "._,: PROJECT TITLE: Amberwood Preliminary Plat WORK ORDER NO: 78756 LOCATION: 6001 NE 4th Street I NOV 2000 ECONOMIC D SITE AREA: 199,505.6 sf(4.58 acres) BUILDING AREA(gross): NEI(,Hg E SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has proposed subdividing a 199,505 square foot(4.58 A) propertyy, a15=1 .t,ie Preliminary Plat process, into 19 lots syitable for detached, single-family residences. An existing house and out-buildings would b: removed. Access would be from NE 4t Street to the north, via Rosario Avenue NE, and an extension of NE 3`d Court to the west. Environmental review is required and a public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information impacts Impacts Necessary impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 5 re e 1 S ION 7c^° 1 - 3 (D c rir/1-z_ 67.—L3l2. 1A-C 2V6.NT-OF-isi j IDZDUG7ivn1 F 'tVVE G762455 P z-e/1 Fcs2 5T12-6Er7S MM-9Pe- s L-01- 1 ( \S No-T Gt,(.�7�Jt W H--L:%I t�Z2- 1 r-t /�C�t�S 1:/ �7`1 e'7u7 wets 0010 Uc-7 - NO O7t-1= — Po Li C-Y I SS U .( 'Foil- Sty-}-7 1 C PLI IJ/Vlsllc._ • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or an where 'ona iform bon is needed to properly assess this proposal. 9A/00 Signa ur Direct or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.1( G< Y O'et + ® + CITY OF RENTON ‘e'P�NTC, FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: November 20, 2000 TO: Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner i FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal 2/ SUBJECT: Amberwood Preliminary Plat, 6001 NE 4th St. MITIGATION ITEMS; 1. A fire mitigation fee of$488.00 is required for all new single family structures. FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS; 1. A fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single family structures. If the building square footage exceeds 3600 square feet in area, the minimum fire flow increases to 1500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structures. 2. Roadway turnaround for this size plat requires a full 90 foot diameter/H,p cul-de-sac. /314 Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. 064 City of Ro..-u., Department of Planning/Building/Public ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: -F(re, Pyeuvc(oin COMMENTS DUE: 12/1/00 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-150,PP,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 11/17/00 APPLICANT: Steven Beck PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth Higgins PROJECT TITLE: Amberwood Preliminary Plat WORK ORDER NO: 78756 • LOCATION: 6001 NE 4th Street SITE AREA: 199,505.6 sf(4.58 acres) I BUILDING AREA(gross): 77 ����11nn SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has proposed subdividing a 199,505 square foot( proATnn t\, bj ri�ezfi9'@f the Preliminary Plat process, into 19 lots suitable for detached, single-family residences. An existin house and out-buildings woulc be removed. Access would be from NE 4 Street to the north, via Rosario Avenue NE, and an ext nsion authwee e t. Environmental review is required and a public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Exami er. I OF RENTON FIRE DEPARTMENT A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information impacts impacts Necessary impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing • Air Aesthetics Water LighVGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet ,y� 14,000 Feet itJ a '�� '- gird cis Aleri • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS61)Vei /y Pmcxc' S We have viewed this application •ith particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identifiedareas of probable impact or areas where ad Nona!information is nee, to properly assess this proposal. ate, _ ad. da Si nat re of Director or Authorized Repr-sentative Date Ro 'n Rev.10/93 L 37 . . .S(Y p C.+ �♦ . ice«>::. ._tc } •- 'YP. ..1\TrrcHy. : :.v?v.r}}r ?•f.•, ::vW•xv.:::::nv•n::•:: hin•.:}'ii:'4:•:?•:.}.x.. :.f.•-:}Y}}}Y-}}is:i:i:-ih"v:•::{4!iiit • ::ii:'r?'^:?i4k...... .:.v- ...'... r..r....... r...n„}:}}:::::i?:..:�'.:?:•:4:v::.,•::3:vvil,.:+0}?n:..:.. ..{:.r i;•�ii,Y,.?yi rz}•i r v::::r,'r r.•;:::: n{;)U.:•ivn•'.::}}r:::h}n:ir4:'�:T:.`}:={ii?:i}}:r;n.,v.. v�;v..n:.:v..}::.... %:f.??sti:?•}.0::rh,•N/.t:�:F::i}ir.:{•::.v:.:i•:• .{ ? .: .r. v. •n•: :. n. v.r tr.-.. .•,.ti.::..::�ll�T�:G�I� 'fi111�: : E•r-} }:•:::.�:-v;????};:•},::i�at•:::- Project Name 14(60Z. jooc Pve-6(1/1001 PLAT" Project Address L'ODI 1 yu '1- "-r Contact Person ` WEN eLIL Address 16 aCt SG 1H5444 V-tAnkm '1W5'I Phone Number a,53-770 ` 27100 Permit Number LON ' ob ` (SD ► t ems` I n Project Description tg i SF Qfse�.utuvta 'YI►A Land Use Type: Method of Calculation: '6tnao 0 Residential ITE Trip Generation Manual 0 Retail 0 Traffic Study (Zt o) SF 2-k.si ❑ Non-retail 0 Other 61_57 Calculation: .5 = 1 t31 v� • ?A,�3 x i 3 u 37, Transportation Mitigation Fee: f 3,to3�, aC' Calculated by: 4. kkorkau Date: 1\ 120 )"UuV Account Number: Date of Payment City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL&DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department: Transportation Comments Due: 12/1/00 Application No.: LUA-00-150,PP,ECF Date Circulated:11/17/00 Applicant: Steven Beck Project Manager:Elizabeth Higgins Project Title: Amberwood Preliminary Plat Work Order No: 78756 Location: 6001 NE 4th St. Site Area: 199,506.6 sf(4.58 acres) Building Area(gross): A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments No comment. B.Policy-Related Comments No comment. C. Code-Related Comments Transportation improvements will be required which include but are not limited to curb, gutter, sidewalks, street paving and street lights per City of Renton Standards/Codes. The above street improvements are required on all existing streets abutting the plat as well as within the plat. Traffic mitigation fees of$75/trip will be required(see attached calculation fee for this project$13,637.25).- 4 ,e4-t4L/ 4 //= z CO— Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date g P Lual5Oplc , City of h.ntc.., Department of Planning/Building/Public Woi�� ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEE REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Po hC. - COMMENTS DUE: 12/1/00 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-150,PP,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 11/17/00 APPLICANT: Steven Beck PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth Higgins PROJECT TITLE: Amberwood Preliminary Plat WORK ORDER NO: 78756 LOCATION: 6001 NE 4th Street SITE AREA: 199,505.6 sf(4.58 acres) I BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has proposed subdividing a 199,505 square foot(4.58 A)property, by means of the Preliminary Plat process, into 19 lots ssiitable for detached, single-family residences. An existing house and out-buildings would be removed. Access would be from NE 4 Street to the north,via Rosario Avenue NE, and an extension of NE 3 Court to the west. Environmental review is required and a public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet - yn rui I± tm?c1 B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or arE where additional inform tion is needed to properly assess this proposai. Signature of Director or Authori d epresentative Date Routing Rr i c: ; . ,, -- CITE ' RENTON W ._ �,,, Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator November 22,2000 Mr. Doug Snyder DEVELOPMENT REMONNING Assistant Superintendent Issaquah School District 3 565 NW Holly NovN Z�00 Issaquah, WA 98027 REcevE® Subject: Amberwood Preliminary Plat 6r LUA00-150,PP,ECF The City of Renton Development Services Division has received an application to subdivide 4.58 acres into 19 lots for detached,single-family residences. The property is located at 6001 NE 4th Street. In order to process this application, the Development Services Division needs to know which schools would be attended by children living in residences at the location indicated above. Would you please fill in the appropriate schools on the list below and return this letter to my attention, Development Services Division, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,Washington 98055.. Elementary School: Apollo Elementary Middle School: Maywood Middle. 'School High School: Liberty. High School'.:' ::<;, Will the schools you have indicated be able to handle the impactof the additional students estimated to come from the proposed development? Yes No Any Comments: Apollo Elementary and, Maywood Middle School's are at capacity. Additional capacity will be required to house additional growth. The construction of additional capacity is. p1ànned as per the 2000 Capital Facilities Plan. The funding for the new capacity will be through school impa and capital bonds. Thank you for providing this important information. If you have any questions regarding this project, please contact me at(425)430-7382. Sincerely, Elizabeth Higgins;AICP Project Manager school/ /kac 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 :: This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer PROPI Y -7RVICES FEE REVIEW FOR St V'QIONS No. 2000-o4 . m 5 t=.y. - '$=r APPLICANT:; ) -17A111 f �1,41,1 "� �^'�^}� L. L. ) RECEIVED FROM • .(date) JOB ADDRESS:_ , l 1-1 4T1-1. 31E-1' WO# 7A7: ifo • NATURE OF WORK:A g Lc.-4 Lc)L1L -P'- T L(� „t� RW.} b 1 `t-) LND# 10- O , 1 V PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF SUBDIVISION BY ONG PLAT, NEED MORE ORMATION: 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION SHORT PLAT,BINDING SITE PLAN,ETC. 0 PID#'s 0 VICINITY MAP ❑ FINAL REVIEW OF SUBDIVISION,THIS REVIEW REPLACES 0 SQUARE FOOTAGE 0 OTHER •- PRELIMINARY FEE REVIEW DATED ❑ FRONT FOOTAGE pi, SUBJECT PROPERTY PARENT PID# J4 ,c S-clOPC, X NEW KING CO.TAX ACCT.#(s)are required when assigned by King County. It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice,that the fees quoted below may be applicable to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are potential charges that may be due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements(i.e.underground utilities,street improvements,etc.) Triggering mechanisms for the SDC fees will be based on current City ordinances and determined by the applicable Utility Section. Please note that these fees are subject to change without notice. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of Building Permit/Construction Permit application. ❑ The existing house on SP Lot# ,addressed as has not previously paid SDC fees,due to connection to City utilities prior to existance of SDC fee Ord. SP Lot# will be .. subject to future SDC fees if triggering mechanisms are touched within current City Ordinances. ❑ We understand that this subdivision is in the preliminary stage and that we will have the opportunity to review it again before recordation. . The following quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees,side sewer permits,r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. 1 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PARCEL METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT 1 DISTRICTS NO. NO. ASSESSMENT UNITS OR FEE Latecomer Agreement(pvt)WATER -O- Latecomer Agreement(pvt)WASTEWATER(Cla-t ()cots 40 ZPF t 444,153.3 Latecomer Agreement(pvt)OTHER -o - ^ Special Assessment District/WATER /0 • ,.--r 191=LtJ-G-L li`l j 1C o042- s2xU1-1 -}- -tot - Special Assessment District/WASTEWATER 11-11 '>=1 ' . • Joint Use Agreement(METRO) -0- Local Improvement District * -0- Traffic Benefit Zones $75.00 PER TRIP,CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION -0- FUTURE OBLIGATIONS • I I I -o- SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WATER 0 Estimated #OF UNITS/ SDC FEE 0 Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) 0 Never Pd SQ.FIG. Single family residential$850/unit x 19 WATT s t vi E 15 la, ' Mobile home dwelling unit$680/unit in park PACYIb BY WRIT VIEW Apartment,Condo$510/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial, $0.113/sq.ft.of property(not less than$850.00)x • Boeing,by Special Agreement/Footprint of Bldg plus 15 ft perimeter(2,800 GPM threshold) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WASTEWATER Estimated F ❑Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) 0 Never Pd Single family residential$585/unit x .. Icf .. `4 1 h 115.oo) Mobile home dwelling unit$468/unit x • Apartment,Condo$350/unit not in CD or COR zones x • • Commercial/Industrial$0.078/sq.ft.of property x(not less than$585.00) ' SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SURFACEWATER 0 Estimated. ❑Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) 0 Never Pd Single family residential and mobile home dwelling unit$385/unit x 1 Cr ' 0 7)315.00 All other properties$0.129sq ft of new impervious area of property x (not less than$385.00) 612 I PRELIMINARY TOTAL $ L • Signatu f Rev mg Authority ATE/ • K o o ❑ *If subject property is within an LID,it is developers responsibility to check with the Finance Dept.for paid/un-paid status. 1 ElSquare footage figures are taken from the King County Assessor's map and are subject to change. m • ❑ Current City SDC fee charges apply to w .*1-10 il✓ :'T�-1• 5`mS`�"M .t. .v, c+3 �� ,1=- C' lt-1 c1= . " 0l_1 1/I/o 1 . 1- .>=.S 4 -P4.1#Z> 16'ff- , 15-1-7,j4. wlU_. +-_-f-4 -- -i-i L'= f_li=--.\n/ CG1.11_ -c-rIcsLi G34 _, o c:/template/feeappl/tgb EFFECTIVE July 16, 1995/Ord.Nos.4506,4507,4508,4525,and 4526 30- / So y CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: January 30, 2001 TO: Neil Watts FROM: Elizabeth Higgins COPY: Jennifer Henning, File SUBJECT: Amberwood LUA00-150 This memo is written at your request to provide you with a timeline for the above referenced project. Amberwood is a proposed preliminary plat in a newly annexed portion of Renton along NE 4th Street. A preapplication conference was held on June 1, 2000. The application was taken in on November 13, 2000. The application was deemed complete on November 17, 2000. The project was "posted" the same day. Comments were due to the planner on Dec. 1, 2000. Dec 12, 2000 was set for Environmental Review Committee and January 16, 2001 (8 weeks from date of complete application) was set for the public hearing before the Hearing Examiner. During review of the project several aspects of the plan were identified as being in need of revision (see attached memo sent (by fax) to the contact/engineer on Dec 5th). Among other things, information provided during the preapplication had not been incorporated into the plan. Also, necessary information was needed to complete the review. Particularly, the applicant had not provided the required calculation of "net acreage" so that the density, based on the proposed number of units, could be calculated. It also appeared that neither the applicant nor the property owner actually held title to all the property shown as being within the boundaries of the property. A "hold" could have been placed on the project at this point based on any of the points raised in the Dec 5t memo. • 74, Memorandum January 30, 2001 Page 2 of 3 On Dec 6th, we requested the following: • corrections to errors in the individual lot area calculations shown on the submitted plan, • clarification regarding use of roof drains, • explanation regarding proposed excavation of on site material, • correction to the traffic study that did not take into account a new traffic signal, • correction to an error in traffic study regarding estimated intersection traffic delay times, • and cautioning that conditions could be imposed if issues were left unresolved at the time of the ERC meeting (still scheduled for Dec 12th). The proposed project went before the ERC on Dec 12th and was given a threshold determination. On Dec 13th, a letter was sent that confirmed the ERC approval, but delineating 5 items still outstanding that needed to be resolved prior to the hearing (see attached), including the fact that staff could still not verify that the project was below the maximum density due to lack of information about total street area. It appeared that, with the 19 lots proposed, the project would be over-dense. On Dec 15th, at their request, we provided the contact/engineer with the Code requirement for calculating project density and a density worksheet. The week following the ERC meeting, and considerably later than the end of the comment period for the project review, we were informed by the Transportation Division of Public Works that the entry road to the project would have to be off-set (off the City grid system) to align with the entry to the Windsong development (a "King County" project) located across NE 4th Street. We passed this information along to the contact/engineer. At about this time, it was becoming more apparent that with 19 lots the project was over-dense. We met with Mr. Beck and his engineer and suggested some ways to lay out the plat in order to align the road efficiently. There did not seem to be a way, however, to provide legal and logical access to all the lots and have sufficient net acreage to meet his goal of 19 lots. On Jan 3rd, a plan was submitted that did not show the entry road aligned with the road across NE 4th St. There were numerous other problems with the plan, to which we responded the same day (see attached). I warned the engineer that I needed to have a plan that met the Code requirements in order to write the staff report for the Hearing Examiner and the due date for the report was noon on Jan 9th. We also discussed that other issues were still unresolved. Memo to NW.rtf\ Memorandum January 30, 2001 Page 3of3 I was informed that Mr. Beck was attempting to negotiate with the neighbor in order to share the right-of-way, thereby increasing the net acreage on his property. I cautioned that an agreement would have to be finalized by the hearing or it would be made a condition of approval. I was subsequently asked by the engineer to reschedule the hearing to the next available hearing date, which was February 6th because they could not provide the necessary material and information before the Jan 16th hearing report due date. Mr. Beck called and asked that Owen Dennison and I meet with him, which we did on January 26th. He had a new plan (with 20 lots), which was different from the previous concept submitted by the engineer on Jan 22"d. The new plan showed future development on the neighboring property, which he proposed the City annex. Aside from the annexation issues, the primary problem with the plan was that he was only going to provide a 21 foot right-of-way on his property. He was told that the right-of- way would have to be wider to meet minimum fire code requirements and that in order to use the land on the other side of the property line, which is also the city boundary, he would have to contact King County. In addition, I told him that I absolutely had to have a plan, because the staff report was due to the Hearing Examiner at noon on Jan 30. He subsequently authorized the engineer to provide me with a revised site plan (18 lots and roads aligned), which he did. The engineering drawings had still not been provided by 5 pm on the 30th Memo to NW.rtf\ .fCY ° City of Renton ♦ ..0 ♦ Development Services Division e 1055 South Grady Way, 6th Floor � Renton, WA 98055 Date: December 5, 2000 TO: Lafe Hermansen FROM: Elizabeth Higgins, AICP Senior Planner CORE Design Development Services Div. Development/Planning Phone: (425) 885-7877 Phone: (425) 430-7382 Fax: (425) 885-7963 . Fax Phone: (425) 430-7300 SUBJECT: Amberwood Preliminary Plat I Number of pages including cover sheet: 2 REMARKS: ❑ Original to ❑ Urgent ❑ As ❑ Please ® For your be mailed Requested Comment review Please review the following comments (see plan included herewith): • Rosario Ave NE (152nd Ave SE) must include 35' of right-of-way • We are unclear if there is an existing dedicated right-of-way. Please provide documentation from the title company (King County recording no. 5790506) as also requested in letter of 12/5/00. • The 26' access easement will require a hammerhead turnaround, 45' north and south of center line of access easement. • The half cul-de-sac will have to be relocated to serve lots 18 and 19 (no private driveway in right-of way is allowed). • All streets, including private easements that serve three or more lots, must be included in the calculation of street area and deducted from the gross site area for purposes of calculating density. • Please demonstrate that you are not exceeding the maximum density of 5.0 du per net acre. • You will have to request a modification due to "more than four lots not abutting a public street" (lots 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17). IAN/11w"L• Ahead of the curve mar 6 M I„9m•91.88IN" avme.w. • -r-iviv �--bib i--9 ----U-� r vrtiz x F f a 4 c I 1 lfizt \. M�yy�1•I 38 LL96�� 6138 ears Brxa1 1 a =rat 323VNIVZI4 A 1) - N. W L8 • OWN. A �, % i �- --T---I --�—�\ of FO )12" r r ,. l-1- I --- ---�2 _,„/— 3 asn • I1 1 I: j ,ti• -vit— a i 391L4Es 1 I. r laoa'� \\. s� ♦a• • . • �jJ I qti I 1 t ,rr L 31V9l —Onr- — `^ q • _ 1 , Imo_ __ -/� .. L_• 1. ,,-sj st-i\•\ t..� zsb 17fr I o9 ,q .* I a• o 1125—yp— re) '1 9 ;- I II �N ----16 •04 iI1TYse .9L 1 • —1 1 .v `.�— _. — ---_ 1GS-' 21 7.11 OH II �'0...00 I'ms "LL 3�YLIV9 I tr ittfr:av3 I 1 •- I . 1 q4 'ft.• 1, 1 I men„ilk . X I f, a• \e0eL I x �o� I I rn 1 _ifA • I 1 I • 4 d j70,4 i • Tr , 986 fy it, IFEWX17.1111 — —I 1; --4. • ,r, • S1puk.• • I • Sf10H I ••1 4,, �� c.,q- ,x w .n�a� ��n� ,: a 1 �b •sou 1 '': :' . q♦ ; _:.. . zt • 1 tiq• I ♦ / II - I -••70... Ix •3S 5O8L I en '7X1Vj� ji1 s.s•• i 1 1{ °��d� i i�l Z •g .:.: —�� I m • r r� w r \ �qti♦ '7F •�7Aryl d� -' V o� I 0 •♦ si♦ �i•• �•• • • O9 pS �•0♦ ' � 9 09 r-- AGM1 v1Ai 11° il I J ,os 1 a;•• ,,01• I I •.A,. ♦• ,• I® I ,,..., -- 1 OP r ��/t,.yw 0� �f 7 i/ V I 1 £ 9 7 "i { _ \ ,, : L . •38 t\LL i .4 tort a �,I a•38 to I-. . 1791122 N?` I I • 6 ♦• 1 qg e• '3;• ,s a O♦• LI 4ct • ti♦��I c`• �;♦ ')" rot• I a' �� ♦ I C, 6 1 sire ,>••I 4.•\ ; o•- . • 73 0 oe. 13.7117W7177 ' 031 0... m a a. • a• x *tl1 vat N. — _94 ••••-•-•.....4 • I I i. I • • I. A 91 get, i ,.A .. • • Ic,l w I • I' I• X 1 D I qv I .o I • a= 1 4,07 49 °�♦ I +' 6,0/sovivz zt t W �� Irl o f R eua ti.• --1 ��sT-t - m" i a g� N_ �N I I C7 I '" O` I I • 4,1 0 I al I I'N 1 li I. 1 LLEL 'c 1 . ,>. I -�r � wI � I •I. 1 V N IN j I ; • �I I / 1 w w I aN w It ( • 1 ''s��,: I • 213N! •T � I Q ` . J , L— — z—o I'----a----I J (i: • • 40. o- Al E.,c.. .-. !— --- ..I Il { -- 'a30111014311VH !.... • • . � CITY:_����.'.:.RENTON. : :..� Planning/Building/Public Works Department • Jesse Tanner;Mayor" • Gregg Zimmerman P E.,Administrator. . • . � � . • December 13,2000 • : . _ • *Mr. Lafe Hermansen . • Core Design, Inc: " 4205—148th Avenue NE;#200 Bellevue,WA 98007 • • • SUBJECT: 'Amberwood Preliminary Plat ' . : Project No. LUA-00-150,PP,ECF Dear Mr. Hermansen: • This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee(ERC)and is to advise you that they have completed their review of the,subject project. The ERC,on December 12, 2000, issued a ;• • threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures.:See the enclosed - -• Mitigation Measures document. • ` _ • Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM January 2;2001: .: Appeals must be filed in writing together:with therequired:$75.00 application;fee with: Hearing Examiner, • City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. 'Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110:•Additional information regarding the'appeal process may ; be obtained from the Renton City:Clerk'sOffice;(425)-430-6510. _ A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular:meeting in the Council ., Chambers on the seventh floorof City Hall, on January 16,2001 at 900 AM to consider.the Preliminary Plat. The applicant or representative(s)of the applicant is required to-be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing:'If the Environmental Determination is appealed,the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. '. - As you are aware;certain information is still required to be submitted before the staff report to the Hearing Examiner can be prepared. Please provide the following by 5 pm onJanuaeY2,2001 1. The legal description for the subject plat excepts the east 30 feet for road. However,.the Assessor's map does not show an exception for said 30 feet. Also,the legal description noted for the subject tax- =: . parcel in the KingCoun Tax Rolls Only states"LESS.CO ROAD." Please have the titlecom an tY Y. p . y::_ provide a copy of King County Recording No..5790506,which is noted in the legal description:for road purposes. 2 Please verify the information included in Table Ili Levels of Service included;within the,traffic impact Study, The'°WorstMovement Delay"for the,intersection of NE 4th Street/148th,Avenue.SE (Nile Avenue NE)"with the project'.(and the 4.77 Court and Maplewood:_Estates projects) is Shown as , :718.9 seconds. You should be aware that Maplewood Estates is installing a signal at this intersection. : .3. Your calculation of street area does:not"appear to include the private access street and required. • ".; turnaround. Include the additional5.feet of right=)f-way required for:Rosario Avenue:NE"(see • "Advisory Notes to Applicant" included herewith for required street revisions). :Please provide this • square footage.amount. . '1055 South.Grady Way Renton,Washington 98055 . • • ' Mr. Lafe Hermansen ' December 13,2000 Page-2 ; • • 4. Using the revised net acreage, provide a density calculation worksheet that demonstrates the. • proposed project does not exceed the maximum density for the Residential 5 Zone of 5.0 du/net acre. 5.-Provide:revised plans and PMTs that incorporate required site plan changes (see"Advisory:Notes,to Applicant"included herewith for required revisions). In order to prepare the staff report by the deadline we will need the information above :If it is not received by the date assigned,we will reschedule the meeting before the Hearing Examiner.. • If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at(425)430-7382. Sincerely Elizabeth Higgins,AICP' Senior Planner `= • • cc: Mr. &Mrs. David Johnson/Owner" Mr.Steven Beck/Amberwood, LLC • " \ • Enclosure• • • • yv • • dnsmltr • :. • i 9ti Y °� CityofRenton .,u ♦ Development Services Division " N�o5. 1055 South Grady Way, 6th Floor Renton, WA 98055 Date: January 3, 2001 TO: Lafe Hermansen FROM: Elizabeth Higgins, AICP Senior Planner CORE Design Development Services Div. Development/Planning Phone: (425) 885-7877 Phone:. (425) 430-7382 Fax: (425) 885-7963 Fax Phone: (425) 430-7300 SUBJECT: Amberwood Preliminary Plat I Number of pages including cover sheet: 2 REMARKS: ❑ Original to ❑ Urgent ❑ As ❑ Please ® For your be mailed Requested Comment information Here are some preliminary comments. Please take note, do revisions, and resubmit for review. 1tV1IMill. Ahead of the curve • • TAN. 3.2001 9:19AM CORE I; '�YGN INC ti NO.E8 P. .. - .. _...,011.. �---,.s.,„ ANEW te 2%c.r T'1r /At 3s' 1W 1 z 3 1 I 5fi CPo 6a o i (4 U 63° 65' CE � 7 6.4 V l't � • fi+ru. ( (Ant( -1. rib'A /I ESA um� LIDI � 6, I • 7 • 8 Kl.r *U I (CO' 1 (vo' (oo f ' 14 _ .-- ` ) .. _ , � . • �, is 35 4"3 g I . 9 iv II — . . -- . . tb II (D#'S f Im (� jJDIj�fj/l(}71.17.1 �Z D U t ( ,� .1 �. —" ... . .' � s r r1 1 ' .la', 4 tgAkedfIN1 -rxmo�tc o ? - et-*--- • I�fl'� u �,l.'sY'',Nry �� E=� Gad :111 .. — �.� - ��� 5 ace ta,kc. 3 , i8 s-rDprt-AaAwktrc .........r: .. 4205 148th Ave.N.E.Suite 200 , C RE Bellevue,Washington 98007 425.885.7877 Fax 425.885.7963 DESIGN E-mail:office@deionline.com January 30, 2001 Core No. 00059 Elizabeth Higgins, AICP, Senior Planner Development Services Division—Development/Planning "pif Renton City Hall—6th Floor ✓.Q/`/ �® 1055 South Grady Way euiCD 32OO/ Renton, Washington 98055 /NG c7/V10/0N Subject: Revisions to Amberwood Preliminary Plat Renton File No. LUA-00-150, PP, ECF • Dear Ms. Higgins: The Amberwood Preliminary Plat Application has been revised in response to preliminary concerns of various City departments and the Cities recent interpretation of the minimum lot widths in the R-5 zone. The lot layout has been revised to address concerns about livability and automobile access issues. The lot count has also been reduced from 19 lots to 18 lots; this keeps the project within the density requirements for the R-5 zone. Attatchments and Revisions: 1. Application Form—No changes. Retain original submittals. 2. Environmental Checklist—No changes. Retain original submittals. 3. List of Surrounding Property Owners—No changes. Retain original submittals. 4. Project Narrative—Attached are 12 copies of a revised project narrative to replace our original. 5. Construction Mitigation Description—No changes. Retain original submittals. 6. Neighborhood Detail Map—No changes. Retain original submittals. 7. Preliminary Plat Plan(Sheet 1 of 1)—Attached are 12 copies (1 —8.5 X 11 reduction) and one colored copy of the revised plan for replacement. 8. Preliminary Utility, Grading, and Drainage Plan(Sheet 1 of 1)— 12 copies of the revised plan for replacement will be submitted on Wednesday January 31, 2001. 9. Boundary Topographic Survey Plan(Sheet 1 of 1)—Attached are 12 copies (1 — 8.5 X 11 reduction) of the revised plan for replacement. t! ENGINEERING • PLANNING • SURVEYING 1:`,2(}0O\000591Docs100O59 l ir01.doc • , 12/30/2001 Ms. Elizabeth Higgins, AICP Page 2 10. Tree Cutting and Clearing Plan(Sheet 1 of 1)—4 copies of the revised plan for replacement will be submitted on Wednesday January 31, 2001. Please call with any questions regarding these revisions. Thank You. Sincerely, CORE DESIGN,INC. (qXtQ-------- Lafe B. Hermansen, Project Planner cc: Mr. Steven Beck 4, " CITY T1' RENTON ..1L Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator January 4, 2001 Mr. Lafe Hermansen Core Design, Inc. 4205— 148th Avenue NE, #200 Bellevue,WA 98007 SUBJECT: Amberwood Preliminary Plat; "`" Project No. LUA-00-15OPP,ECF` • Dear Mr. Hermansen: This letter is to inform you that"the comment and appeal, periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed on the. ERC determination. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures. A Public Hearing is scheduled to be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner on January 16, 2001, at 9:00 AM, in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall:-to consider the Preliminary Plat. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant isrequiredto.be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at(425)430-7382. For the Environmental Review Committee, Elizabeth Higgins,AICP Senior Planner cc: Mr. & Mrs. David Johnson/Owners Mr. Steven Beck/Amberwood, LLC FiNAI 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 :: This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-00-150,PP,ECF APPLICANT: Amberwood, LLC. PROJECT NAME: AMBERWOOD PRELIMINARY PLAT DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has proposed subdividing a 199,505 sq. ft. (4.58 A) property, by means of the Preliminary Plat process, into 19 lots suitable for detached, single-family residences. An existing house and out-buildings woulq be removed. Access would be from NE 4th Street to the north, via Rosario Avenue NE, and an extension of NE 3 Court to the west. Environmental review is required and a public hearing before the city of Renton Hearing Examiner. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 6001 NE 4th Street LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM January 2, 2001. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8- 11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)- 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: December 18, 2000 DATE OF DECISION: December 12, 2000 SIGNATURES: iih),t ?w, 6✓ecfG/ 2)Vt;Il/H-e✓1/AG(VI I Z/ /UC) Ghegg Zimmerman,Administrator / DATE Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ‘:--e )Z (, Z 747Y:0 Shepherd, A minisf�`ator($onmunityDATE Services Vivi 72 1/7z-itec (2-/(2-/00 Le heeler, Fire Chi DATE Renton Fire Department dnsmsig CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-00-150,PP,ECF APPLICANT: Amberwood, LLC. PROJECT NAME: AMBERWOOD PRELIMINARY PLAT DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has proposed subdividing a 199,505 sq. ft. (4.58 A) property, by means of the Preliminary Plat process, into 19 lots suitable for detached, singlt@-family residences. An existing house and out-buildings would be remgved. Access would be from NE 4 Street to the north, via Rosario Avenue NE, and an extension of NE 3ru Court to the west. Environmental review is required and a public hearing before the city of Renton Hearing Examiner. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 6001 NE 4th Street MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The project shall comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). 2. A silt fence shall be installed along the downslope perimeter of the area that is to be disturbed. The silt fence shall be in place before clearing and grading is initiated, and shall be constructed in conformance with the specifications presented in the KCSWDM. 3. Shallow drainage swales shall be constructed in intercept surface water flow and route the flow away from the construction area to a stabilized discharge point. Vegetation growth shall be established in the ditch by seeding or placing sod. Depending on site grades, it may be necessary to line the ditch with rock to protect the ditch from erosion and to reduce flow rates. The design and construction of drainage swales shall conform the specifications presented in the most recent KCSWDM. 4. The project contractor shall perform daily review and maintenance of all erosion and sedimentation control measures at the site during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. 5. Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation shall be submitted by the project Engineer of Record to the Public Works Inspector for the construction of the civil improvements of the plat. Certification of the installation, maintenance, and proper removal of the erosion control facilities shall be required prior to recording of the plat. 6. The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee at the rate of $75.00 per each new average weekday trip attributable to the project, estimated to be 9.55 average weekday trips per new residence.The Transportation Mitigation Fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. 7. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $488.00 per each new single family residential lot created by the proposed plat. The fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. 8. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee at the rate of $530.76 per each new single family residential lot. The fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. 9. The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the geotechnical engineers, Terra Associates, Inc., in their report, dated September 15, 2000. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-00-150,PP,ECF APPLICANT: Amberwood, LLC. PROJECT NAME: AMBERWOOD PRELIMINARY PLAT DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has proposed subdividing a 199,505 sq. ft. (4.58 A) property, by means of the Preliminary Plat process, into 19 lots suitable for detached, singltg-family residences. An existing house and out-buildings would be removed. Access would be from NE 4 Street to the north, via Rosario Avenue NE, and an extension of NE 3r Court to the west. Environmental review is required and a public hearing before the city of Renton Hearing Examiner. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 6001 NE 4th Street Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Plan Review—Sanitary Sewer 1. A sewer cleanout will need to be located five feet out from buildings. 2. Separate side sewers will be required for each parcel (no dual sewers). Side sewer lines must have a 2 percent slope. 3. All utility plans must comply with the City of Renton Drafting Standards. 4. Show finished floor elevations on the sewer construction plan sheet. 5. The vertical profile of the sewer main will be required. 6. The project will be required to extend the sanitary sewer main from the Maplewood Estates Plat to serve this plat. 7. Side sewer stubs to each lot in the plat will be required at a cost of$60 each. 8. Any new sewer mains are to be separated from water lines by a minimum of 10 feet. There is a 7.5 foot minimum separation from other utilities. 9. Sewer Development Charges of$760.00 per single family residence will be required for this plat. The fee for this 19 lot project would be $14,440.00. There is no credit given for existing houses. This fee must be paid prior to issuance of the construction permit for the preliminary plat. 10. An additional charge will be assessed for the East Renton Interceptor Special Assessment District No. 9204 (City of Renton Ordinance no. 4362, September 2, 1992). The amount will be determined later. Plan Review—Water 1. The project would be served by King County Water District No 90. Amberwood Preliminary Plat LUA-00-150,PP,ECF Advisory Notes (continued) Page 2 of 4 Plan Review—Stormwater Drainage 1. Drawings submitted to the City of Renton are to be on 22 inch x 34 inch sheets. 2. Before any construction or development activity occurs, a pre-construction meeting must be held with the City of Renton Development Services Division, Construction Services (425-277-5570). 3. The City of Renton retains the right to restrict the timing of land clearing and tree cutting activities to specific dates and/or seasons when such restrictions may be necessary for the public health, safety, and welfare, or for the protection of the environment. 4. Surface Water System Development charges of$525 per new single family residence will be required for this plat. No credit is given for existing houses. The fee for this 19 lot project would be $9,975.00. This fee must be paid prior to issuance of the construction permit for the preliminary plat. Plan Review—Transportation and Street Improvements 1. The minimum right-of-way for Rosario Ave NE is 35 feet. An additional 5 feet will be required to be dedicated. 2. The half cul-de-sac must be relocated to the south of the right-of-way, to provide access for lots 18 and 19. 3. Until such time that the half cul-de-sac is reconfigured as a full cul-de-sac, a 45' extension to the west, for a hammerhead turn around, will be required. 4. The half street(Rosario Avenue NE), half cul-de-sac, private access road and hammerhead turnaround must be signed and striped for"No Parking." 5. Because the plat plan indicates there are more than 4 lots not abutting a public street (lots 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17), a modification from street standards must be requested and approved, or one lot eliminated, or the plan reconfigured. 6. An approved hammerhead turnaround will be required at lots 15 and 16 at the terminus of the 26' private access road. 7. All electrical and communication facilities to be underground behind the sidewalk. If right-of-way space is not available then in a utility easement. 8. Street lighting is required to meet City standards. The street lighting conduit to be located under the sidewalk. 9. The minimum right-of-way width is 42 feet(modified from street standard width of 50 feet). 10. The cul-de-sac is required to have a minimum pavement radius of 45 feet and right-of-way radius of 50 feet. 11. A 5 foot sidewalk at the curb is required inside the plat. A 6 foot sidewalk on NE 4th St is required. 12. Payment of a Transportation Mitigation fee of$75 per new average weekday trip, estimated at 9.55 new trips per single family lot, will be required prior to recording of the plat. It has been estimated that this 19 lot plat(credit would be given for the existing house)would result in approximately 171.9 additional average (weekday)trips. The Transportation Mitigation Fee would be $12,892.50. Plan Review—General 1. All required utility, drainage, and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a registered Civil Engineer. 2. The construction permit application(s) must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. Amberwood Preliminary Plat LUA-00-150,PP,ECF Advisory Notes (continued) Page 3 of 4 3. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5 percent of the first$100,000 of the estimated construction costs;4 percent of anything over$100,000, but less than $200,000, and 3 percent of anything over$200,000. Half of this fee must be paid upon application for construction permits (preliminary plat improvements), and the remainder when the construction permit is issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. Parks Department Review 1. Payment of a Parks Mitigation fee of$530.76 for each new single family lot will be required prior to recording of the plat. Credit would be given for the existing house. Building Department Review 1. Demolition permits will be required. 2. Any Underground Storage Tanks (UST) must be removed by a licensed contractor according to State of Washington UST regulations. Fire Prevention Department Review 1. A fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single family structures. If the building square footage exceeds 3600 square feet in area, the minimum fire flow increases to 1500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structure. 2. The applicant shall provide field-tested certification, from King County Water District 90, that a fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow is located within 300 feet of all new single family structures. Certification shall be provided prior to recording of the plat. 3. Houses located on deadend streets more than 500 feet in length must be sprinklered. 4. A Fire Mitigation fee of $488 is required for all new single family lots. Payment is required prior to recording of the plat. Property Services Department Review 1. Comments will be provided under separate cover. Development Services Department Review 1. The site is designated Residential Single Family in the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The property is zoned Residential 5 (R-5). 3. There is no minimum density in the R-5 Zone, The maximum density, however, is 5.0 dwelling units per net acre (du/a). 4. The minimum lot size in the R-5 Zone is 7,200 sf, with minimum width of 50 for interior lots and 60 for corner lots. The minimum permitted lot depth is 65 feet. Lot dimensions must be shown on the final site plan demonstrating that all lots meet these minimums. 5. Heights of buildings in the R-5 Zone are limited to 2 stories, or 30 feet. Amberwood Preliminary Plat LUA-00-150,PP,ECF Advisory Notes (continued) Page 4 of 4 6. Required front setbacks in the R-5 Zone are 15 feet for houses and 20 feet for attached garages which access from the new streets; 20 foot rear yard setbacks; 5 foot side yard setbacks for interior lots and 15 feet sideyard setbacks for corner lots. All setbacks are minimums. Lots 25 and 28, which are corner lots, do not appear to have adequate side yard setbacks and must be adjusted accordingly. Setback dimensions should be shown on the construction drawings, but setback lines must be removed prior to recording the final plat. 7. The maximum building coverage in the R-5 Zone is 50 percent for lots 5,000 sf and less and 35 percent or 2500 sf for lots larger than 5,000 sf. 8. The property is within the Issaquah School District. Payment of school impact fees to the Issaquah School District would be a condition of plat approval. 9. Retaining walls in excess of four(4)feet require engineered drawings and a separate building permit. 10. The grading plan indicates grading is proposed off-site on properties located to the west and south. The applicant is reminded that all grading for the proposed project must occur within the boundaries of the property, unless easements are obtained from abutting property owners. 11. Construction easements obtained from abutting property owners may be necessary prior to construction of retaining walls on or near property lines. These agreements must include protection measures for (or permission to potentially damage or remove) trees located on abutting properties within 20 feet of the property line. 13. The applicant will be required to draft and record a maintenance agreement or establish a Homeowners' Association for the maintenance of all common improvements (access and utility easements, rights-of-way, and stormwater facilities). A draft of the document shall be submitted to the City of Renton for review and approval by the City Attorney prior to the recording of the preliminary plat. 14. A Forest Practices Permit, obtainable from the Department of Natural Resources, will be required prior to removal of existing trees. 15. The applicant must contact Paul Alexander of the King County Department of Transportation, Metro Transportation, Metro Transit Route Facilities at 206-684-1599, regarding Metro's requirements for a transit stop on NE 4th Street. 16. Performance Standards for Land Development Permits (RMC 4-4-130K), including "Protection Measures During Construction" (RMC 4-4-130K7) relating to trees, shall be followed by the applicant. The applicant shall adhere to the definition of"tree" a found in RMC 4-11-200, "drip line" as found in RMC 4-11-040, and the measurement of trees as found in RMC 4-11-030. A' AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION • Charlotte Ann Kassens, first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 a daily newspaper published seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, . - - - --. ------ Washington. The South County Journal has been approved as a legal NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION t newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE ' County. RENTON,WASHINGTON The notice in the exact form attached,waspublished in the South The Environmental Review Committee , has issued a Determination' of Non- County Journal (and not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to .Significance-Mitigated for the following the subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a project under the authority of the Renton , Municipal Code. AMBERWOOD PRELIMINARY PLAT Amberwood Preliminart Plat LUA-00-150,PP,ECF Environmental review for proposed as published on: 12/18/00 subdivision of a 4.58 acre property into lots _ - suitable for single family homes. Location: ,6001 NE 4th Street. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of ! Appeals of the environmental $51.75, charged to Acct. No. 8051067. f determination must be filed in writing on or ;before 5:00 PM January 2, 2001. Appeals ; must be filed in writing together with the Legal Numb ' required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by e , City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8- , 110. Additional information regarding the . appeal process may be obtained from the e , South County Journal , Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)430-6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Subscribed and sworn before me on this a-k day of . , 2000 , Chambers, City Hall, on January 16, 2001 , •``````,1����t�t��'' at 9:00 AM to consider the preliminary plat. �� If the Environmental Determination is �Ei............Ey! appealed,�''. of hispulic he the aring.Intl be heard as erested ested parties are� 4.�,1rt /4 xj04fr,* � ,t( invited to attend the public hearing. �'•4� F�;; f Published in the South County Journal I �1 N0 NARY v'= `� (V/ _December 18,2000.8539 ,_a...0_ 's N=% pUeL�c ar Notary Public of the State of Washington %�q'mac p6 �j,Q�'��?` residing in Renton �4.0* WASH,,v6`�` King County, Washington h itiii to NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. AMBERWOOD PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA-00-150,PP,ECF Environmental review for proposed subdivision of a 4.58 acre property into lots suitable for single family homes. Location: 6001 NE 4th Street. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM January 2, 2001. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers, City Hall, on January 16, 2001 at 9:00 AM to consider the preliminary plat. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. Interested parties are invited to attend the public hearing. Publication Date: December 18, 2000 Account No. 51067 dnsmpub.dot . 1\I rilitT I* 11.. • • ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: AMBERWOOD PRELIMINARY PLAT PROJECT NUMBER: LUA•00.150,PP,ECF The applicant has proposed subdividing a 199,505 sq.ft.(4.58 A)property,by means of the Preliminary . Plat process,into 19 lots suitable for detached,single•family residences. An existing house end out. buildings would be removed.Access would be from NE 4°1 Street to the north,via Rosario Avenue NE, and an extension of NE 3i°Court to the west Environmental review is required and a public hearing before the city of Renton Hearing Examiner.Location:6001 NE 40 StreeL THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE(ERC)HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM January 2,2001. Appeals must be filed In writing together with the required 975.00 application foo with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to tho Examiner aro governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8.11B.Additional Information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)430.6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting In No Council Chambers on tho seventh floor of City Hall,on January 16,2001 at 9:00 AM to consider the Preliminary Plat.The applicant or reprosentative(s)of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. If the Environmental Determination is appealed,the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. 2J ,,.....,...2 ® J e 1 I. .I.u ii "9 a a e 10 % e NE-* 'ft o . 1— , 4-.aE.t dam. • .moo/si.� emnss4, _Y 3 �th ) i ru f". + — M.`ter i t.r7 t...�a ' S. .�. a ©9 l' M' w �:tqlt,h•Hi CHEST,: ESTaI:F Sr'a `"^,' III. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please Include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. CERTIFICATION • I, I Al2Avee DeBokid , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by ml, 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on . p< , 15 Z.r o(1 • i Signed: 0_ ,��e ai‘'----" - ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me,a Nortary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing ini eira,g.,,, ,on the .A day of i . cGC a • ?�-„sri.Z.e�^ • I, t___....../y_„„) coitsp... MARILYN Kt\IIt'll-2EFF= '11 NOTARY PUBIIC l STATE OF WASHING ION MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES • MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 JUNE 2�`.j, 2003 �; r CITY,;(¢ RENTON Planning%Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner. a' Gregg Ziimmeriinan P.E.,Administrator • December 13,2000 ': . Mr. Lafe:Hermansen ;Core.Design,..Inc:_ 4205148t Avenue NEi.#200. .• :-Bellevue,WA 98007 • • . . .. • :. • SUBJECT: - fAmberwood Preliminary Piet - Project No, LUA-00-150,PP,ECF •.Dear:Mr:.Hermansen • • - _This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review;Committee (ERC)and is to advise you that • - they have completed their review of the subject project.:.The ERC;•on December 12,2000, issued a, threshold.Determination of Non-Si nificance-Mitigated with Mitigation-Measures.:See the enclosed Mitigation Measures document.' • • • Appeals of the environmental de termination must be filed in writing•on or_before 5:00 PM January 2;200.1. . • Appeals_,must be filed in writing together'with,the:required $75.00 application,fee with:Hearing Examiner,.. City of Renton, ;1055SouthGrady Way, Rentori,-WA;98055`YAppeals to the:Examiner are governed.by :City.of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110 Additio„'nalrvinformation regarding the'appeal process may . ;. be obtained from the Renton City`Clerk's Office,-(425)430-6510::. . • A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton_,Hearing Exam m iner at his'regular. eeting.in the Council • Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, on January 16, 2001.at 9;00 AMto consider the Preliminary Plat. The applicant or representatives)of the applicant is-required,to-be present at the public hearing A copy of the staff report will be mailed'.,to you one-week before'the.hearing:";If the'Environmental Determination is appealed,the appeal will be heard as part`of this_public hearing. • As you are aware, certain information is stillrequiredto besubmiitted before the staff report to the'Hearing -Examiner can be prepared. Please provide the"following by 5 pm on January 2,2001: 2-1 1.•;The legal description for the subject plat excepts the east 30 feet for road.:However, the Assessor's • map does not.show an'exception for said 30 feet..•Also, the legal descriptiion noted for the subject tax. parcel in the King County Tax Rolls only states"LESS:CO;ROAD."•;Please have the title company • provide a copy of King County Recording No:.5790506,which is'noted in thelegal description for road ur oses. 2: Please verify the information_included in TableIll Levels'of Service included within'the,traffic impact. stud : The-"Worst Movement Dela for the intersection of NE 4th Street/148•h.:Avenue SE (Nile • Avenue NE),"With the project"(and the.4.77 Court and Maplewood Estates projects is shown.as•, •,_ ': 7189 seconds.'YOU-should be aware that Maplewood Estates is installing a signal at this Intersection... ° 3. Your;calculation of street area-does:not`a p pear to include theprivate access street and.required..;J',' turnarounds Include the-additional'5-feet of righit-of-wa':re uired for;Rosario Avenue NE see :. • '`Advisory Notes to'Applicant"included herewith for.required;street revisions).;.:Please provide this. s uare foota' m e:aount: G 9 .:... . .. :=1055 South.Grad Wa =:Renton Washin on 98055: • '" • -- This oaoer contains 50%recycled material.20%post consumer - Mr. Lafe Hermansen ':. . December 13,2000 _ .., Page-2 4.Using the revised net acreage,provide a density calculation worksheet that demonstrates the proposed project does not exceed the.maximum:density for the Residential 5 Zone of5.0 du/net acre. ' 5.:Provide revised plans arid,PMTs that incorporate required;site plan changes(see"Advisory Notes to ' Applicant"included herewith for required revisions).'- fn order to prepare the staff report by the deadline we will need the information,above.- If it is not received by the date assigned• ,we will reschedule the meeting before the Hearing Examiner. If you have any questions'dr desire clarification of the above, please call me at(425)430-7382. Sincerely:. : . . Elizabeth Higgins;AICP Senior Planner 'cc: Mr. &Mrs. David Johnson/Owners Mr. Steven Beck/Amberwood,:(Lc x' • Enclosure :. :f CITY OF..RENTON DETERMINATION OF:NON-SIGNIFICANCE , (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-00-150,PP,ECF' APPLICANT: . . . ?. • Amberwood, LLC • • PROJECT NAME::. AMBERWOOD PRELIMINARY PLAT - • DESCRIPTION OF.PROPOSAL : The applicant has proposed subdividing a 199,505 sq. ft. (4:58 A). property, by.means of the Preliminary Plat process; into 19 lots suitable for detached, single-family residences: :An existing house and out-buildings would be removed. Access.would be from NE 4 Street to the north,-.via Rosario Avenue NE, and an extension of NE 3r Court to the west. Environmental review is required and a public hearing before the city of Renton Hearing Examiner.:` _- - . LOCATION OF.PROPOSAL: 6001 NE 4thh:Street , ' MITIGATION MEASURES: :- 1. The project shall comply with the1998 King County Surface Water°DesignManual (KCSWDM). - 2: A silt fence shall be installed along the'downslope perimeter of,.•the area that is to be disturbed. The silt fence shall be:in place:'before`clearing and grading is''initiated, and shall be constructed in conformance with the specifications presented in the.KCSWDM. 3. Shallow:drainage swales;shall be,constructedin.intercept'`surface water flow and route the.flow away . from the construction area to:a stabilized discharge"point. Vegetation growth shall be established in the ditch by seeding or placing sod. Depending"on':site grades' it May necessary to line the ditch - with rock to protect the ditch from';erosion and to reduce flow;rates. The design and construction of drainage swales shall conform the,specifications presented-in;the•most recent KCSWDM. 4. The project contractor shall'perform,;daily, review and maintenance:of all erosion and sedimentation control measures at the site during the'construction-,of;both off--site'and on-site improvements as well as building construction. f,•‘; - • 5. Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion:control plan with any recommendations of change or revision'to maintenance schedules installation shall be submitted by the project Engineer of Record to the Public Works Inspector for the construction of the civil improvements of the plat. • Certification of the installation, maintenance, and proper removal of the erosion control facilities shall be required prior to recording of the plat. 6. .:The a� -:licant.:shall pay applicable•.Transportation Mitigation- pp theFee at the rate of $75.00 per each : • -' . _" •new average weekday.trip;attributable to the project,'estimated to be 9.55_average weekday trips per • new.residence:'The T• ransportation Mitigation,Fee is due prior.to the recording of the'plat:. : 7. The'applicant:shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $488.00 per each new single: family residential lot created by the proposed plat.'The fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. : :B. :.The applicant`shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee at:the rate of $530.75 per:each:new .: single family residential lot. The fee.,is due prior to the recording of the plat. 9. -.The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the:geotechnical engineers,Terra-Associates, lnc;- ‘,, in their report, dated;September,15,2000.. - • CITY•OF.:RENTON - DETERMINATION OF.NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED)' ADVISORY NOTES. .:: APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-00-150,PP,ECF: ; . • APPLICANT:; ' :° Amberwood, LLC PROJECT NAME: „. AMBERWOOD PRELIMINARY PLAT: : _ DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has proposed subdividing a 199,505:sq.ft. (4.58 A) property, by means•-of the Preliminary Plat process, into--19:-lots suitable for detached,- siriglt�-family residences::An existing house and out-buildings. would be removed. Access would be from NE 4 '• Street • :to the'north, via Rosario Avenue NE, and an extension`of NE 3` Court to the west.:'Environmental review is required and a`public hearing before the city of Renton,Hearing Examiner. • - ';:LOCATION OF PROPOSAL:: ;, 6001 NE 4th Street : - Advisory Notes to Applicant: ' The following notesare'supplemental information,:provided in conjunction with the environmental determination.:.Because these notes are.provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. - Plan Review—Sanitary Sewer. I. , A sewer cleanout will need‘to be located five feet out from`buildings. 2. • Separate side sewers will lie required for:each,parcef(no dual sewers). Side sewer lines must have a 2 percent slope. :. '' :.:.'7 •.• ..Ar ,.':r? ',' :.:!/ ._ •.;:ice• 3. All utility plans must comply with,tl-ie City of Renton Drafting Standards. • 4.- . Show finished floor elevations on the sewer construct'ion'plansleet. . 5. The vertical profile of the Sewermain willbe""required. ,'' 6. - The project will be required to extend the sanitary sewer main from the Maplewood Estates Plat to,serve this plat. ::. 7. -Side sewer stubs to each lot in the plat will be required at a cost of$60 each. - 8." Any new sewer mains are to be separated from water lines by a minimum of 10'feet::There is.a: :.,:' ;7:5 foot minimum separation from other utilities. :. • • _9: "Sewer Development Charges of $760.00'per•.single family residence will be required for this ' plat..The fee for this 19 lot project would be $14,440.00. There is.no credit given for existing houses. .!•. .This fee must be paid prior to issuance of the.construction permit for the preliminary plat. : ::. =' 10. An additional charge will.•.be assessed for the East Renton Interceptor Special"Assessment' ' District No: 9204 (City of Renton Ordinance no:'4362;''September 2, 1992).' The amount will be determined later: Plan Review-Water: 1. : The project would be served by King County Water District No90. • Amberwood Preliminary Plat: LUA=00-150,PP,ECF. "Advisory Notes(continued) Page 2 of 4. Plan Review.=Stormwater,Drainage:,- • - 1: :Drawings submitted to the City of Renton are to be on 22 inch x 34 inch sheets:: . 2.. Before any construction or development activity occurs, a pre-construction meeting must be held with the City of Renton Development'Services Division,:construction Services (425-277-5570). - - , 3., .The City of Renton retains the right to restrict the timing of land clearing and tree cutting activities to specific dates and/or-seasons when such restrictions may bp necessary for the public•health, safety, , and welfare,'or.for the protection of the environment. : - 4. Surface Water System;Development charges of$525 per new-single family:residence.will be required . - for this plat.. No credit is given for existing houses. The fee for this 19 lot project would be $9,975.00. This fee must be paid prior to issuance of the construction permit for the preliminary plat. Plan Review-Transportation•and Street Improvements 1: .. The minimum right-of-way for Rosario Ave NE is 35 feet. An additional 5 feet will be required to : be dedicated. 2. The half cul-de-sac must be relocated to the south of,the.right-of-way, to provide access for lots 18 and 19. - µ _ ,YY 3. Until such time that the,half cul-de-sac is reconfigured,as a`full cul-de-sac, a 45' extension to .:. the west, for-a•hammerheadturn around,will be required. �;.:;-•`; �•. .. . •: - _ 4:. .. The half street(Rosario Avenue:NE),half cul-de-sac, private:access road and hammerhead . . turnaround.must be signed and striped for N ,oParking.-.; _ ;: :. -. • 5. , Because the plat Plan i;ndicates there are more than 4 lots not abutting a public street(lots 13, 14, 15, 16,•and 17), a modification from,street'standards must be requested and approved;or'one lot . eliminated, or the plan reconfigured. • • 6. • An approved hammerhead turnaround.will be required'at lots-16 and 16.at the terminus of the • 26'private access road. • - • 7. All electrical and communication facilities to,be;underground'behind the sidewalk. .If right-of way space is not available then in a.utility easement. ; 8. Street lighting is required to meet City,standards:The street lighting conduit to be located under the sidewalk. .. 9. . The minimum right-of-way width is 42 feet(modified from street standard width of-50 feet). 10. :The cul-de-sac is:required to,have a minimum;pavement radius of 45 feet and_rightt-of-way radius of 50 feet.: 11. A 5 foot sidewalk at the curb is required inside the plat: A 6 foot sidewalk on'NE 4 St is required.., 12. Payment of a Transportation Mitigation fee of$75 per new average weekday trip, estimated:at :. 9.55 new trips per single family lot,Will be required prior to recording of the plat.• It has been estimated that this 19 lot plat(credit would be given for the existing house)would result in approximately 171.9 additional average(weekday)trips. The Transportation Mitigation Fee would be$12,892:50. Plan Review-General required,utility,:drainage,and street improvements will require separate plan:submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a registered Civil Engineer. ; • 2:° The con ppli struction permit acations)must include an itemized cost estimate;for;these• improvements. . 7 • - :Amberwood Preliminary-Plat LUA-00-150,PP,ECF : Advisory:Notes (continued) '. : - Page 3.of 4 3. The fee for review-and inspection of these improvements is 5 percent of the first$100,000 of the , • :..estimate d construction;costs, 4 percent of anything over$100,000, but less than $200,000, and 3 ''' percent of anything over.$200,000. Half of this fee must,be paid upon application for construction permits (preliminary plat improvements);and the remainder when the construction permit is issued. There may be additional:fees;for water service related.expenses. Parks Department Review • : Payment of a Parks Mitigation fee of$530.76 foreachnew single family lot will be required prior to recording of the plat.Credit would.be given for the existing house., •Building Department Review- : q � ... •,.._.. .. 1: Demolition permits will;be re ui'red. .. • •; 2. Any Underground Storage Tanks (UST) must be removed:by a licensed contractor according to State • • - of Washington UST regulations. Fire Prevention`Department Review 1. A fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow is required within 300.feetof all new single family,structures. If the building square footage exceeds 3600.square'feet„in:area;,.the minimum fire flow increases to 1500 GPM and requires two hydrants within`300 feet of:the structure. 2.' The.applicant shall provide field-tested,certification, from King County Water District 90, .that a fire • ' hydrant with :1000 GPM fire flow is`.located,_within.;:300 feet of all,.new.single family:structures. ' Certification shall be provided prior to recordingof the plat. - • 3. :.Houses located on deadend streets more'than 500 feet in length must be sprinklered. 4. A Fire Mitigation fee of $488e is;required for all-new single family"lots: Payment is required prior'to recording of the plat: • Property Services Department Review 1. Comments will be provided under separate,cover. ; ,w: :> • Development Services Department Review: .'. 1.` -,The site is designated Residential Single Family in the Comprehensive.Plan, • 2 The property is zoned Residential 5(R-5) 3. There is,no.minimum density,in the R-5 Zone;"The maximum density,however, is 5.0 dwelling • units per'net acre (du/a). 4. ; 'The minimum lot size in.the R-5 Zone is 7,200 sf, with minimum:width of 50 for interior lots and 60 for corner lots.:The,minimum'permitted lot depth;is 65 feet.`Lot dimensions must be shown on the: final site plan demonstrating that all lots meet these minimums: • , 5..:::•::: Heights of•buildings in the R-5 Zone are limited to 2 stories,or 30 feet.' - Amberwood Preliminary;Plat - LUA=00-.150,PP,ECF, ::: Advisory Notes (continued) Page4of4:. :Required,front setbacks in the R-5 Zone are'15 feet for house's :and: 20.feet;for attached garages which access from the new streets; 20 foot rear yard setbacks, 5footside yard setbacks for interior lots and 15 feet sideyard setbacks for:corner loft. :Ali setbacks are minimums:: Lots 25 and :28,"''which:are corner lots, do not appear to have adequate side yard setbacks:and must be adjusted accordingly.,. Setback dimensions should be shown on the construction drawings, but setback lines `.;must be removed prior to recording the final plat. 7: The maximum building coverage in the R-5 Zone is 50 percent for lots 5,000 sf and less and 35 percent or 2500 sf for lots larger than 5,000 sf: 8. . The property is within the Issaquah School District: Payment,of school impact fees to the - Issaquah School District would be a condition of plat approval. • ‘9. • Retaining walls in excess of four (4)feet require engineered drawings and:a separate building permit. .' . :10.:: `The grading plan indicates"grading is proposed off-site on .properties'located to the west and south: The applicant is reminded that all ,grading for;:the proposed project:must occur:within the boundaries of the property, unless easements are obtained from.abutting property owners.` • '11. • "Construction easements obtained from:abutting property owners may be necessary prior to construction of retaining walls on or near property lines. These',agreements must include protection measures for (or permission to potentially damage or remove) trees located `on abutting properties within 20_feet of the property',line.; ;. 12. The applicant will:;be required to draft and record a maintenance agreement or establish .a Homeowners' Association for..the maintenance of all common:improvements' (access and utility easements, rights-of-way, and stormwater facilities).` A draft of the document shall be submitted to the City.of Renton for review and approval by the City-Attorney prior.to;the recording of;the'preliminary plat. 13. A Forest Practices Permit,`obtainable from the Department,`of:-Natural Resources, will be required prior to removal of existing trees: 14. .The applicant must contact Paul Alexander of the King:County Department of Transportation, Metro " Transportation, Metro Transit Route Facilities,'at 206-684-1599, regarding Metro's requirements for a transit stop on NE 4 h Street. . .:15./Performance.. Standards:for Land Development ,Permits ',(RMC 4-:4=130K),":.including ''Protection; TheM our I Duringcnt shallC adheretton"-(RMC 4-4-130K7).relating to trees,shallbe followed:by the applicant. ppthe definition of"tree"a'foundin`RMC4-11.-200,`"drip:line" as found in 'RMC 4-11-040, and the measurement of trees as found in RMC 4-1 1-030..,.: - ,. - CITY: ( ;:RENTON. fa-7' •••' „ - - • ••: • :• : ..IL Planning%Building%Public Works Department n r "' '•-Jesse Tanner,Mayor ;'''• :, � ;.. :=:.', . :• -.: .. , .. ...-Gregg ZimmermanP.E.,Administrator' istrato December.13,2000 • Washington State " - Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703... :. Olympia;WA 98504-7703 Subject: .:= Environmental Determinations • Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by • the Environmental Review Committee(ERC)on December 12,2000: ' DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED " - AMBERWOOD PRELIMINARY PLAT : LUA-00-150,PP,ECF.. - The applicant has proposed subdividing a 199,505 aq ft. (4.58 A) property, by means of the Preliminary.Plat process, into 19 lots suitable for detached,'single-family residences: An existing house and out-buildings would he removed.Access would befrom NE'4'h Street to the north,via :. Rosario Avenue NE, and an extension of NE Cou:rttothewest. Environmentalreview:iS,... required and a public:hearing before-the city of Renton Hearing,Examiner." Location:'6001.NE 4th Appeals of the environmental.determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM January 2, 2001, Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are • governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110, ,Additional"information regarding the appeal : process may obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office (425)-430-6510,.. :'.If you have questions, please call me at:(425)430-7382. • For the Environmental Review Committee, Elizabeth Higgins,AICP - Senior Planner: • cc: :„ King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries V David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources `: WSDOT, Northwest Region' - Duwamish Tribal Office- Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe(Ordinance) - U$'Army.Corp. of Engineers 055 Sou - ' --- South Grad Wa Renton,Washington 98055 =...;;::_ •- ..' : STAFF City of Renton REPORT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE: December 12, 2000 Project Name: Amberwood Preliminary Plat Applicant: Steven Beck Amberwood, LLC. 19129 SE 145th Street Renton, WA 98059 File Number: LUA-00-150, PP, ECF Reviewing Planner: Elizabeth Higgins, AICP Project Description: Steven Beck, of Amberwood, LLC, has proposed subdivision of an approximately 183,273 sf(4.2 acre) property into 19 lots suitable for detached, single family houses. Lots would range in size from 7,204 sf to 9,627 sf The property is located at 6001 NE 4th Street, in a Residential 5 (R-5)Zone, which allows and/or requires no more than 5.0 dwelling units per net acre (du/a). Approximately 14,758 sf(0.34 acre)of the site would be public right-of-way and therefore is deducted from the gross square footage of the site for density calculations. The net site area is 168,515 sf(3.87 acre), therefore the density is 4.9 du/a. Primary access would be from a new public street intersected with NE 4th Street. This new street would terminate in a cul-de-sac. Additional access would be from an extension of NE 3rd Court, a new public street within the Maplewood subdivision. A modification from street standards has been requested to reduce the width of the public right-of-way from 50 feet to 42 feet. Existing structures on the site, including one single family residence, would be removed. Approximately 7,500 cubic yards of topsoil will be stripped from the site. Another 4,000 cy would be excavated, but reused on the site as embankment fill. A separate tract on the property will have a private stormwater system to be maintained by a Homeowners'Association. The project requires Environmental Review, Preliminary Plat approval, administrative approval of a reduced public street right-of-way (from 50 to 42 feet wide) and, if necessary following construction design, Board of Public Works approval for driveways sloped greater than 8 percent. Project Location: The project is located at 6001 NE 4th Street in Northeast Renton. Project Location Map ercrpt City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environ, rl Review Committee Staff Report AMBER WOOD PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA-00-150,PP,ECF ' REPORT AND DECISION OF DECEMBER 12,2000 Page 2 of 10 i! I Pmn i L fta7ef s i S. 2: 4 3 i ; PI: II _ a a I.Q a .,..R`. .g Qs S.EtvEa • ., .120TN ST.bx+u :+„4,+�a , itiennr.(rxtc+ , . fa4Y Cf t u"n 7 / • Hla7 — r—. lib +ASi Nf aaW r f r �r 11 .nAe.IS '' N Nab S Gladys Swanson w m ; ® •I A.LI Aa y t - a g E 7 s�qq 2]0 Ae. Y I ';� ,. al t.ioAc. 1.47 At. Ye ,I- :... 4 W t - (_�j/ t G U !� 4I ® 107..0 ,Sa @ /a (Amu ', (• ., .. 4A7Ae. ® •I 3 . qf Es_ Q1 ® C e Wax. O ¢ E I f .r 3J`uwem •.was..4 ......0 4iI cu a1 rm r-••-ar' ;�•"'I • } a- A }'a 22; j` I 471.221"7 1 � -. nan t aH.a 0 %� i-a/Y n.V un rn .11 Tn keR`.'oei[ I . • S FII Exist. Bldg. Area gsf: Existing structures to be Proposed New Bldg.Area gs: N/A -• - demolished. -- Site Area: 183,273 sf(4.2 acre) Total Building Area gsf: N/A RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance—Mitigated. B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the responsible officials make the following environmental determination: DETERMINATION OF 1., DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. v Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period followed b a 14 da A eal Period. ercrpt City of Renton P/B/PW Department Envirom 1 Review Committee Staff Report AMBERWOOD PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA-00-150,PP,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF DECEMBER 12,2000 Page 3 of 10 C. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. The project shall comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). 2. A silt fence shall be installed along the downslope perimeter of the area that is to be disturbed. The silt fence shall be in place before clearing and grading is initiated, and shall be constructed in conformance with the specifications presented in the KCSWDM. 3. Shallow drainage swales shall be constructed in intercept surface water flow and route the flow away from the construction area to a stabilized discharge point. Vegetation growth shall be established in the ditch by seeding or placing sod. Depending on site grades, it may be necessary to line the ditch with rock to protect the ditch from erosion and to reduce flow rates. The design and construction of drainage swales shall conform the specifications presented in the most recent KCSWDM. 4. The project contractor shall perform daily review and maintenance of all erosion and sedimentation control measures at the site during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. 5. Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation shall be submitted by the project Engineer of Record to the Public Works Inspector for the construction of the civil improvements of the plat. Certification of the installation, maintenance, and proper removal of the erosion control facilities shall be required prior to recording of the plat. 6. The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee at the rate of$75.00 per each new average weekday trip attributable to the project, estimated to be 9.55 average weekday trips per new residence. The Transportation Mitigation Fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. 7. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$488.00 per each new single family residential lot created by the proposed plat. The fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. 8. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee at the rate of$530.76 per each new single family residential lot. The fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. 9. The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the geotechnical engineers, Terra Associates, Inc., in their report, dated September 15, 2000. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Plan Review—Sanitary Sewer 1. A sewer cleanout will need to be located five feet out from buildings. 2. Separate side sewers will be required for each parcel (no dual sewers). Side sewer lines must have a 2 percent slope. 3. All utility plans must comply with the City of Renton Drafting Standards. 4. Show finished floor elevations on the sewer construction plan sheet. 5. The vertical profile of the sewer main will be required. 6. The project will be required to extend the sanitary sewer main from the Maplewood Estates Plat to serve this plat. 7. Side sewer stubs to each lot in the plat will be required at a cost of$60 each. ercrpt City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environ z1 Review Committee Staff Report AMBER WOOD PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA-00-150,PP,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF DECEMBER 12,2000 Page 4 of 10 8. Any new sewer mains are to be separated from water lines by a minimum of 10 feet. There is a 7.5 foot minimum separation from other utilities. 9. Sewer Development Charges of$760.00 per single family residence will be required for this plat. The fee for this 19 lot project would be$14,440.00. There is no credit given for existing houses. This fee must be paid prior to issuance of the construction permit for the preliminary plat. 10. An additional-charge will be assessed for the East Renton Interceptor Special Assessment District No. 9204 (City of Renton Ordinance no. 4362, September 2, 1992). The amount will be determined later. Plan Review—Water 1. The project would be served by King County Water District No 90. Plan Review—Stormwater Drainage 1. Drawings submitted to the City of Renton are to be on 22 inch x 34 inch sheets. 2. Before any construction or development activity occurs, a pre-construction meeting must be held with the City of Renton Development Services Division, Construction Services (425-277-5570). 3. The City of Renton retains the right to restrict the timing of land clearing and tree cutting activities to specific dates and/or seasons when such restrictions may be necessary for the public health, safety, and welfare, or for the protection of the environment. 4. Surface Water System Development charges of$525 per new single family residence will be required for this plat. No credit is given for existing houses. The fee for this 19 lot project would be $9,975.00. This fee must be paid prior to issuance of the construction permit for the preliminary plat. Plan Review—Transportation and Street Improvements 1. The minimum right-of-way for Rosario Ave NE is 35 feet. An additional 5 feet will be required to be dedicated. 2. The half cul-de-sac must be relocated to the south of the right-of-way, to provide access for lots 18 and 19. 3. Until such time that the half cul-de-sac is reconfigured as a full cul-de-sac, a 45' extension to the west, for a hammerhead turn around, will be required. 4. The half street(Rosario Avenue NE), half cul-de-sac, private access road and hammerhead turnaround must be signed and striped for"No Parking." 5. Because the plat plan indicates there are more than 4 lots not abutting a public street(lots 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17), a modification from street standards must be requested and approved, or one lot eliminated, or the plan reconfigured. 6. An approved hammerhead turnaround will be required at lots 15 and 16 at the terminus of the 26' private access road. 7. All electrical and communication facilities to be underground behind the sidewalk. If right-of-way space is not available then in a utility easement. 8. Street lighting is required to meet City standards. The street lighting conduit to be located under the sidewalk. 9. The minimum right-of-way width is 42 feet(modified from street standard width of 50 feet). 10. The cul-de-sac is required to have a minimum pavement radius of 45 feet and right-of-way radius of 50 feet. 11. A 5 foot sidewalk at the curb is required inside the plat. A 6 foot sidewalk on NE 4th St is required. 12. Payment of a Transportation Mitigation fee of$75 per new average weekday trip, estimated at 9.55 new trips per single family lot, will be required prior to recording of the plat. It has been estimated that this 19 lot plat(credit would be given for the existing house)would result in approximately 171.9 additional average (weekday)trips. The Transportation Mitigation Fee would be $12,892.50. Plan Review—General 1. All required utility, drainage, and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a registered Civil Engineer. 2. The construction permit application(s) must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. ercrpt City of Renton P/B/PWDepartment Environ zl Review Committee Staff Report AMBER WOOD PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA-00-150,PP,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF DECEMBER 12,2000 Page 5 of 10 3. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5 percent of the first$100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4 percent of anything over$100,000, but less than $200,000, and 3 percent of anything over $200,000. Half of this fee must be paid upon application for construction permits (preliminary plat improvements), and the remainder when the construction permit is issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. Parks Department Review 1. Payment of a Parks Mitigation fee of$530.76 for each new single family lot will be required prior to recording of the plat. Credit would be given for the existing house. Building Department Review 1. Demolition permits will be required. 2. Any Underground Storage Tanks (UST)must be removed by a licensed contractor according to State of Washington UST regulations. Fire Prevention Department Review 1. A fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single family structures. If the building square footage exceeds 3600 square feet in area, the minimum fire flow increases to 1500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structure. 2. The applicant shall provide field-tested certification, from King County Water District 90, that a fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow is located within 300 feet of all new single family structures. Certification shall be provided prior to recording of the plat. 3. Houses located on deadend streets more than 500 feet in length must be sprinklered. 4. A Fire Mitigation fee of$488 is required for all new single family lots. Payment is required prior to recording of the plat. Property Services Department Review 1. Comments will be provided under separate cover. Development Services Department Review 1. The site is designated Residential Single Family in the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The property is zoned Residential 5 (R-5). 3. There is no minimum density in the R-5 Zone, The maximum density, however, is 5.0 dwelling units per net acre (du/a). 4. The minimum lot size in the R-5 Zone is 7,200 sf,with minimum width of 50 for interior lots and 60 for corner lots. The minimum permitted lot depth is 65 feet. Lot dimensions must be shown on the final site plan demonstrating that all lots meet these minimums. 5. Heights of buildings in the R-5 Zone are limited to 2 stories, or 30 feet. 6. Required front setbacks in the R-5 Zone are 15 feet for houses and 20 feet for attached garages which access from the new streets; 20 foot rear yard setbacks; 5 foot side yard setbacks for interior lots and 15 feet sideyard setbacks for corner lots. All setbacks are minimums. Lots 25 and 28, which are corner lots, do not appear to have adequate side yard setbacks and must be adjusted accordingly. Setback dimensions should be shown on the construction drawings, but setback lines must be removed prior to recording the final plat. 7. The maximum building coverage in the R-5 Zone is 50 percent for lots 5,000 sf and less and 35 percent or 2500 sf for lots larger than 5,000 sf. 8. The property is within the Issaquah School District. Payment of school impact fees to the Issaquah School District would be a condition of plat approval. 9. Retaining walls in excess of four(4)feet require engineered drawings and a separate building permit. 10. The grading plan indicates grading is proposed off-site on properties located to the west and south. The applicant is reminded that all grading for the proposed project must occur within the boundaries of the property, unless easements are obtained from abutting property owners. ercrpt City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environ, :1 Review Committee Staff Report AMBERWOOD PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA-00-150,PP,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF DECEMBER 12,2000 Page 6 of 10 11. Construction easements obtained from abutting property owners may be necessary prior to construction of retaining walls on or near property lines. These agreements must include protection measures for(or permission to potentially damage or remove)trees located on abutting properties within 20 feet of the property line. 13. The applicant will be required to draft and record a maintenance agreement or establish a Homeowners' Association for the maintenance of all common improvements (access and utility easements, rights-of-way, and stormwater facilities). A draft of the document shall be submitted to the City of Renton for review and approval by the City Attorney prior to the recording of the preliminary plat. 14. A Forest Practices Permit, obtainable from the Department of Natural Resources,will be required prior to removal of existing trees. 15. The applicant must contact Paul Alexander of the King County Department of Transportation, Metro Transportation, Metro Transit Route Facilities at 206-684-1599, regarding Metro's requirements for a transit stop on NE 4th Street. 16. Performance Standards for Land Development Permits (RMC 4-4-130K), including"Protection Measures During Construction" (RMC 4-4-130K7)relating to trees, shall be followed by the applicant. The applicant shall adhere to the definition of"tree"a found in RMC 4-11-200, "drip line"as found in RMC 4-11-040, and the measurement of trees as found in RMC 4-11-030. D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 1. Earth/Geology Impacts: The applicant has provided a geotechnical report, "Geotechnical Report Amberwood," by Terra Associates, In., dated September 15, 2000,for the proposed 19 lot Preliminary Plat. This report indicates that test boring on the site exposed existing soils to consist of an approximately 3 inch deep layer of topsoil overlaying 2 to 3 feet of silty sand and sandy silt soils. These underlying soils are loose to medium dense and moist to dry, very weathered till, consisting of silty sand with gravel, cobbles, and some roots. A less weathered layer of till material was encountered 2 to 3 feet below the surface. This till consists of medium dense to very dense and moist to dry silty sand with gravel and cobbles. This layer appears to have a calcite cemetation binding the till. An area approximately 19,600 sf in size, located in the southwest corner of the property, has been filled in the past, probably by relocating material from the southeast corner of the property to balance grades. The fill, found to be between 6 and 8 feet deep, consists of silty gravelly sand.The layer of soil between the fill and the cemented till, which is, apparently, the original surface layer, was found to be"moist to damp." The boring results indicate that soils at 5 feet at this location had a 20 percent moisture content, even though the tests were done on August 21, 1999. Cottonwood trees, often indicators of wet soil conditions, are located in this area of the property. Excavation of this corner of the property is planned for the stormwater detention/wetpond. The geotechnical report makes recommendations regarding construction of this pond, as well as recommendations for site, utility, and building construction. Staff advises that the geotechnical engineers' recommendations, as found in their report, be followed prior to and during construction. Approximately 7,500 cy of topsoil will be stripped and reused on the property. An additional 4,000 cy of soil will be excavated and reused on site as embankment for the pond. ercrpt City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environ 11 Review Committee Staff Report AMBER WOOD PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA-00-150,PP,ECF • REPORT AND DECISION OF DECEMBER 12,2000 Page 7 of 10 The grading plan indicates that significant grade changes may occur on abutting lots. The approximate building pad elevations of lots four and five are 6 feet higher than the abutting lot three and lot seven is 6 feet higher than lot fourteen, but the grading plan does not indicate retaining walls being used. Code requires that retaining walls 48 inches or higher have separate building permits. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the geotechnical engineers, Geotechnical Report Amberwood,"by Terra Associates, Inc., dated September 15, 2000. Nexus: RMC 4-4-060, Grading, Excavation, and Mining Regulations; SEPA 2. Air Impacts: It is anticipated that some adverse air quality impacts would be associated with the site work, building construction phase of the project, and to a certain extent, with subsequent occupation of homes. Project development impacts include dust resulting from grading, exhaust from construction vehicles, and odors from roofing installation, and roadway paving. Dust would be controlled through the use of temporary erosion control measures and the sprinkling of the site as needed. Odor impacts are unavoidable and would be short-term in nature. Post development impacts include vehicle exhaust and the exhaust from heating. Vehicle and construction equipment exhaust, and exhaust from heating sources are controlled by state and federal regulations. No further site specific mitigation for the identified impacts from exhaust are required. Mitigation Measures: None required. Nexus: Not applicable 3. Water Impacts: There are no known wetlands or surface water bodies on the site and no indication that problems associated with groundwater will be encountered, according to the geotechnical engineers, Terra Associates, Inc., in their report, dated September 15, 2000. No mitigation is required. Mitigation Measures: None required. Nexus: Not applicable 4. Transportation Impacts: The proposed project would be primarily accessed from NE 4th Street by Rosario Avenue NE (152nd SE). Rosario would be improved with half-street improvements within a 35 foot right-of-way. It would terminate at the southeast corner of the property in a half cul-de-sac. The half cul-de-sac would include a 45 foot turnaround. A second access would be available by means of the extension of a new public street from the Maplewood Estates subdivision, NE 3rd Court. A modification of street standards to allow a reduction in the right-of-way width from 50 feet to 42 feet has been requested and approved administratively. A 26 foot wide private access easement would provide access to lots 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17. The applicant must request a modification of street standards, however, in order to have more than 4 lots not abutting a public street. A hammerhead turnaround, meeting City standards, would be required. A transportation report by Christopher Brown &Associates, "Amberwood Traffic Impact Analysis,"dated August 26, 2000,was submitted by the applicant. It indicated that levels of service on nearby roads would not be negatively impacted by the proposed project. It is estimated that the proposed project would generate approximately 9.55 new average daily trips (weekday)for each new single family residential lot. Nineteen parcels are proposed, but there is an existing house on the property. Credit would be given for the existing house. Therefore, an estimated 171.9 trips per day will be added to the ercrpt City of Renton P/B/PWDepartment Environ z1 Review Committee Staff Report AMBERWOOD PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA-00-150,PP,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF DECEMBER 12,2000 Page 8 of 10 transportation system. The City of Renton has adopted a Transportation Mitigation Fee to address the impacts to the City's transportation system caused by development, including this proposed project. The applicant would need to pay the appropriate Transportation Mitigation Fee of$75.00 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. The fee is estimated to be $12,892.00, and is payable prior to the recording of the plat. City Code requires street improvements (curb, gutter, sidewalks, drainage, and street lighting)within the plat and on all abutting streets. NE 4th Street does not have street improvements, therefore they would be required. Renton Municipal Code Section 4-18-3 requires applicants to provide haul route plans for approval by the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of a construction permit. Haul hours are also restricted by the Code, and may occur only between the hours of 8:30 am and 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday, unless approved in writing in advance by the Development Services Division. Hauling can be further restricted by the City if the route is near a school. These requirements are intended to diminish impacts on the transportation system resulting from construction of a project. In addition,traffic control measures are required to be provided during construction. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee at the rate of$75.00 for each new average weekday trip attributable to the project. The estimated number of trips per day, per single family lot, is 9.55. The Transportation Mitigation Fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. Nexus: Transportation Mitigation Fee Resolution and Adopting Ordinance; SEPA 5. Fire Protection Impacts: The proposal would result in the creation of 19 single family lots. Future residents would potentially have the need for emergency services which would impact the City's Fire Department. Fire Prevention Bureau staff report that they can serve this development provided that the City Code required improvements are installed, appropriate fire access is provided, and Fire Mitigation Fees are paid. In order to offset the impacts associated with new development, all new residential construction is subject to a Fire Mitigation Fee. The fee is calculated on a per lot basis. The current fee is $488.00 per new single family lot. The fee for the proposed project would be $8,784.00. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the Fire Mitigation Fee equal to$488.00 per new single family lot. The Fire Mitigation Fee shall be paid prior to the recording of the plat. Nexus: Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution and Adopting Ordinance; SEPA 6. Parks and Recreation Impacts: It is anticipated that the proposed development would generate future residents that would utilize existing City park and recreation facilities and programs. The City has adopted a Parks Mitigation Fee of$530.76 per each new single family lot to address these potential impacts. The fee for this project would be $9,553.68. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the Parks Mitigation Fee equal to $530.76 per new single family lot. The Parks Mitigation Fee shall be paid prior to the recording of the plat. Nexus: Parks Mitigation Fee Resolution and Adopting Ordinance; SEPA 7. Stormwater Impacts: The City of Renton has concerns regarding stormwater runoff and its downstream impacts due to surface water flow patterns in the vicinity of the property. Therefore, the requirements of the 1998 King County Surface Water Control Manual must be used for stormwater control. In addition, erosion control measures are recommended as additional conditions of approval. The applicant will submit a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan with construction drawings that indicate these measures would be implemented. ercrpt City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environ 21 Review Committee Staff Report AMBERWOOD PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA-00-150,PP,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF DECEMBER 12,2000 Page 9 of 10 The applicant has submitted a report by Core Design, "Preliminary Storm Drainage Calculations,"dated November 2000. Core Design used the criteria included in the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual for the report. The conceptual stormwater plan proposes that onsite generated stormwater runoff be directed to a combination wetpond/detention pond in the southwest corner of the site and then discharged to the storm drainage system in the Maplewood Estates development. The approximately 3500 foot Maplewood storm system discharges to a pair of 24 inch culverts located south of the intersection of Nile Avenue NE and SE 136th Street. The culverts convey the stormwater to a grass-lined swale which runs southeast and then south for approximately 700 feet until it reaches a 30 inch pipe on the north side of the plat of Briar Hills. This 30 inch pipe directs flows to a detention pond at the south end of Briar Hills. This pond releases to a natural drainage ravine that eventually discharges to the Cedar River at a point approximately one and a half miles downstream of the Amberwood site. The stormwater facility must be maintained by a Homeowners'Association or through a maintenance agreement. Mitigation Measures: 1. The project shall comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). 2. A silt fence shall be installed along the downslope perimeter of the area that is to be disturbed. The silt fence shall be in place before clearing and grading is initiated, and shall be constructed in conformance with the specifications presented in the KCSWDM. 3. Shallow drainage swales shall be constructed in intercept surface water flow and route the flow away from the construction area to a stabilized discharge point. Vegetation growth shall be established in the ditch by seeding or placing sod. Depending on site grades, it may be necessary to line the ditch with rock to protect the ditch from erosion and to reduce flow rates. The design and construction of drainage swales shall conform the specifications presented in the most recent KCSWDM. 4. The project contractor shall perform daily review and maintenance of all erosion and sedimentation control measures at the site during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. 5. Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation shall be submitted by the project Engineer of Record to the Public Works Inspector for the construction of the civil improvements of the plat. Certification of the installation, maintenance, and proper removal of the erosion control facilities shall be required prior to recording of the plat. Nexus: SEPA 8. Vegetation Impacts: Due to soil removal and grading on site, most of the trees and vegetation would be removed prior to construction. The applicant submitted a Tree Cutting and Clearing Plan that indicates that approximately 178 trees 8 inches and greater will be removed from the site. Several trees on the plan submitted appear to be on the abutting property. The applicant has been reminded, in the "Advisory Notes to Applicant,"that trees on abutting properties are afforded protection during construction by means of the Renton Municipal Code. Mitigation Measures: None required. Nexus: Not applicable ercrpt City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environ, rl Review Committee Staff Report AMBERWOOD PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA-00-150,PP,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF DECEMBER 12,2000 Page 10 of 10 9. Land Use Impacts:The applicant has proposed subdividing a 183,273 square foot(4.2 acre) property into 19 lots. The project site consists of one legal tax parcels, previously developed for a single family residence. The remainder of the land is vacant and tree covered. The neighborhood has been undergoing annexation and redevelopment recently, with several new subdivisions being approved and constructed. Maplewood Estates, a 218 lot subdivision abuts the proposed project on the west and south. The annexation line, and new City limit, coincides with the east property boundary of the proposed project. The site is located in the Residential 5 (R-5)Zone, which allows up to 5.0 dwelling units per net acre (du/a). The applicant has proposed developing the land exclusively for the construction of single family, detached homes. The R-5 Zone has been established by the City of Renton for residential development and to prohibit the development of uses that are incompatible with the residential environment. Mitigation Measures: None recommended. Nexus: Not applicable E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM January 2, 2001. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. ercrpt NW 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. F • TV f • ----- --------- N.E. 47H ST. SCALE: 1. = 40' k _— _--WWI--- — --_ _--- -- • IN oo• • <V A• >a — .' `--��G�- NBE'271Tw BE1wID!OTT OF NdTON �•_� 4� 1 CCNTRa MONUMENTS NOS 1151&1152 $ ^ire lvmA _ � : 'SI 14 i I t`I $ %. :7r :1 �� t . I�,3I ; ' • LEGEND LEGAL DESCRIPTION ¢4•1...1: II r I�.I((i i i 3( B SANITARY SLYER MANHOLE Dmr•e NM7 O M NPTwr 101 C S Te.Pmtor aAAm1 a 1K 1,e11Irn MU O a ¢ [ 4 mwa�ii xtwM.w0[0 LVI.�lwLlrt ICm.I w ivo mwiC wla.wmC T rdl' qua M r' I�I I e i e STORM IXiNN MANHOLE dmf M"m"a 1¢T RO®COMO TO PC COW.IA MO IwOxt ST Om RCM=IMP 0 ii . Ilei I ; RLrYIi q.TCOOW = --= , �, I'1111I I ( a atCH BASH ®r T[Mar x MR Rat Ate•a•ct i RRE NroRMEr BENCHMARK i`` /# • , wRme vaSE / P .. 1 I I • amyl NAOO.P OTT OT IOTr1 MANLY C.NA.114 CAM fif \ _ �. • \ I �. K `�\ I wA1FR 151231 l 111 l Laws&MCI N TIC NT.R.m e.(11C tam.r.)• i;((( u _ ,—( C 'iC ^. I I 7ElFR1QiE RISER ortYYYtlI=a(tun.len'n) { 1.(g- ff Y . POMN POLE w/UNOERGRO ND sG 1v•ROOM w.•a sw.[L T�w 1R Mt ac tam Si•tem1.K 3 Y9 i S �dd��/// `r� �` 4 ' iS• a saw P fuTa0 woe) Li at i 3' �E '' a' or i l,,t1 •-o- STREET MONT III 46' A rQ {+ rEC. . ` Y. r . ^\ -� • sn21:r LIGHT VAULT „OT=1P11r COMAS u • • I' Y o`' ° +a' 3 r mo ROCKERY SURVEY NOTES y6 i i s .T2.. --- W r' ` `I V I�:� CONCRETE 1.TIC Mt!a 10 16ARS gMMY MD TwOY1M1Y 966 Td °I MT Iw9Fri NRMt. ♦ f1 .'rC / 5.,r?...6 le Si1 I``- OF OUT/LPN FENCE R 1c1O1p NO Rmam M•Oei toli1e'v e�wrcsurer K Y.a Z� 16010.10M�i1u"RY O z ;' ip I 1 , COMM"Mama v nto mwn.wila«ma. . 1■I ' A rt� j 1 I xSF NOEzfNrAL BOARD FENCE s au MIL RM.0101 MON a MI KW Ma®1 ORA.11D R010 TI y I i' 4' 1 1 i .. .awMt¢COMMIT Gwmmrt"O omnaot WM IO.om1 1•Mt C I.• • S A , C•;: - C 1 i --,� VBF VEAnC•L BOARD FENCE TOM®n'°O 110 MT woWe11K'ms 110.mm'O.roOi1 MIL Oi1w nw iitp2 INC'�.r i '--_ -__.,�.• �. ,r .2 rt •¢I P' \ rS'•C•�• M. 'II M I In.=n 1R WIXO n MGM 11nc M M.COMPANY oor11o1c "\(I/{1 i¢ _' '. j u CAS CASCARA •,woaneT Mu-veam•SWAM Car(Amu Aamy C�.� ?Z.?, , r�..--1-...,..........,_ n NYIO OOUI TOM 1104 NCM IYT PRT ON TO CM 061IOY my=OM C ,*�I ;�J{ / .- i„(- c CEDAR rlma a nu.smulnl rmE•T ARCM awMx Me aP.11amE W N. .w ..JYY �� "1( cN CHERRY m�ww''"°O�P00/01 ma saw ra ancwnr RT CM 6m1 a'rwMTimm ina OUT MAY b W �I 3` :�.. 35; 11 e - iMCNAVE OS CO•m°1�NOT rarA COm°'a IC FOR O1 , 3 1 a , ,6'• — i j --- • COT COTTON tvm "=aver Or dale w N` Q mil O R r' a us eRw•E 1m1®na wOaE 1411361.11607000 COCOONS oTeM a CO O —� eT 1 A� i r."h . 151;1 ' F FIR A•NORrl.Arm ei coma.Mrw m n TOM w wmw®rat vo q ` M. ., uR W jl 9t,1`I` '--- N NORc°f T.NA ream=Mew RAY. __ N O ZI �'`°, O •Ta a•TOO ltYwOH sN.Y. fYLTOC TOTAL eATa N , • ' �1, } "A`` � ``I Y MAPLE mEimCLI110 1164100 •RI•m1 a SNOW a09.sa O.:m OF nmwe31T P C Q O a -� S' J .--?y� 11 • - • POP POPLAR P�r nas SWORD w wAe m-1x-000 ,ulloa Cr.Io1T Nu } i 1: i I - rm maul=AT PA NCI!UMW MCI CAA Cr na OAIS a m 9.6 O W E. • �.• it• 'AS,1,1` Zi 14 `\.` l,o wnvlx mace TOO:4T N mu.,etvl lm 116 9AMY. P w h m Q SE. • 11"wwee (j � �p i 3"1C' Z, y Q y —;;;._____.1;— III r� f //y ,is..., ... • a m z • R E N T O N .m -- '; • 'I i I I y • i e mm.oa ^B 1 IS V IRSO •x a COCCI�: �' R /16 m MIA I \\Sr`Ye„ '1 2' a 1` o n` Q ie a m..R 3��� • Cf z5 �1 i o z 1 o I It ...,_._.... VICINITY YI AP SHEET OF _� —� ,, I 1 NUMBER 11100.6 00058 • NW 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP 23 N, RGE. 5 E., W.M. r 8 N.E. 4TH ST. SCALE: 1" = 40• '— — II Only• s :ors I Al = • n,g)�L7L•/p¢p T-- ---1 " A v t' • -ell!O 1 I ', O ...,: I rT 1 1 I IN \ OD ERR//A I T ii++ •-tY. t I � 1 ° ., I. 1 OWlb 6` �(�j•11( n I ,,J` I 11 I:',I e I.' I DAvm r NANCt'JOINDON v'� I 1 1 1- 4,001 NE au en�T- 'N `: I o I 1. ' I LEGAL DESCRIPTION RENT.,WA woes 'Lpl 'ram'. 37 38 ,,T .,I 2 :y 1 E 4 ;;; I.i • M EMT 4WJQMNOR 10AeT a14RIRQMN01[nr LDT LIAR ERQM .t C-- 111111 >1 I NORMtr6T GLIMMER Cr SECTION 1A TQINSO 33 NORTH ROHE I EAST.0ILLM'!TIE MLCANT.eO L. • 6 I Y 7--1 1 I,11 1" ROD x ND111 eT1@Ei d� I I I:I+1 "i MEDIA%IN KN6 CQIAT.OYEN/GTQ4 I�NNfQL WA noes i 7......1 Pile I I $ I a I D Tl,M NOPEN tl P T ILEIELT COWLT I3 TO K6 CGNTT FOR ROAD RD!)TO•SI00 L I I 1 5 1 I1 I I nra°oece e\-D®R-cCOAm uoBll 1�corrper.No.DlDO'v0•r rs---- -t, .e L. w LL- _. �•. Tr.-- I, I I. w IDt�TMcaer>o rEer nOR SAID Rua PgER/&IRVE1'OR • 1r!I�� 43 ....uwliton�T e9oo1 TT� E 8 ,!. 1`�ggi `\ rL�WTACT,L!Ne'A1ANlBl-TLrnf 11 • I i1 \ DIFYVIDN GTTO11-f�10.4. f ZI } �� s- 1 Iiy.j1 O. I A� F I I :1 VA1l@l-gyp Z • rs .�\ �x;\ SITE STATISTICS • 'II 1 d` 1 r P s. c• �' fi .S I I 1 ecm4CKe. TIIO4T-e' Z 39 40 . . I I . . . ... c' I ,,'� I I L `,L NOE-e•.e'm a.• kg u 1'• I ;• 9.... '� :¢""� \ BENCHMARIG NEAR oc z ! 6 1•+ -�---- TOTAL WE AREA, 1m)v4 er.r4!Aare) d » B In,A- - .L I I I I • OOL'31 HAWS PEN CRT Cr RENTOJ 8AKT W KAYO ISM DATM T1M v. ,��•Ie..•1i d 1• t,\ I PROR�e®IYB. MOLE pW9LT 1bTES (0) 4D • 1 I 1W. T_ \ f•IYB]•!•DRAee&WA=DISC.N M NT.I!4TN eT.ME OB1N NO.O+LOTd e2,.••` I I • I 11`•e •, •" I {•1 Oo.l 1 I - eTl.IA6W AK DLVW '..____. L I I • 1 1 I ^\ EL 4e4.T1 OR re•iN MEOW AVERAGE LOT e1D!.V6O BP. V .t ____.1.1 -Y�___� I I .�I/ 11 W ■I _ b• 'c" d•Y'P I p' i I I ..` OATH AAKCRO EN ERAee N•�ACE DISC.N M NT.eG OST11 BT.I MOP MOT,4D!DL/AC _-_ __�• .II I+-'-m-___ __ 0: _�. I •X '1 ne ll.D4lS10R(N10e 14TRD) I'Oe"BTTID D9:DRT.DDL/.1C . 1 +1`•�• A_ - +' 4 �1. DOeTNO WR!'. R-D 1 14 I '..1 I ', • <;l , y �' Y�1'``_ ----- NOT dj�.�.®IC LOGtTKN a•ualrowD 6TIIILT AREA.-. LIMO er.raa ts6ne) y J 41 Y''••. - OPEN 0PA?J 1 , I 't' 1 " 1<'r- eraR1 MANAGE yM eP.roAa Cr e o v 6 1 °t I �� 'I- �� I t PF N `�O m " -- - L L- � '1��1 ,.I,I ` _d,-•:}-_L:1;PrfIy --I-- Qz. 4 '�\ .4 - - ,= w V -- �_1 I ilk 1\\ _ I g`Ii -.- _- "r, - .FY a 2 W ��3 44 1 c• 16• � I• - 1 D\ ,. - :1:5' 11 I ,II ,,-, _I' QaS .sue �. ,q rr; -- Itin4. ..w I ll d W h' • f.74,,, ,,,I.1 '''' -7'1-- \-1._L‘_'10v, I I 1 , Nr -.7i.. ,e' I 0 —- .s.--... ' . . fi.•. 7,t'-.;-''•. , ; y/ I e o le..)-:- I .0 3 a. • 1 RENTON 111 i.u __T - __I_1-I Z eJ UT 111/// M 1\ �� I ' `1� i I :.:-..:i:'Y..—.p. - ,—�.IC. I�IO=I •Sc`i s ..V . . ...a 6616..6•W 49i .9 1 '� - �' :� :1:: .!,':.:FT- L "J_`,h _^i5 m Dn 0 e e ! T �' I!<� .L (47 48 "� ,. YI � C2�s` o T p 49 50 St 52 53 1 � I .L r•_ i?r7 1 .- III [ SHEET OF • • I \` ", I le VICINI TMAP is NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP PROJECT"U" 00059 • • • - NW 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP 23 N., ROE. 5 E., W.M. E — H. - - - - -- SCALE: 1" = 401 • N.E. 4TH ST. ft.. 2,i ,liii "O CO PS S. ar�4 �N • �grew•NOS >as. r I . I N i'= i�ate` �� �:� � , _ �__ _ • — II h ` i 'o- "i I I� _ i;, '\ OUNER/APPLICANT r� i S I II i= 1; \ `� ' ' BENCHMARK °o wNc wF.�c.� b�'=`E� d P. I T t ' KOI NE ATM WREST ''Vi<�: • I ' I. �_ J I 37 38 I • :� \i,'_.' �-- - . .i in I ,I eo+n+nATare REM CDT aT®Ow naval.0111uw WA DARN IREPOCK ARRLICAN11....LOOM Ye'►.: :! I �1. I F•'-3 \\ I�„ -- PIK=•J'DRAW.BRACE ow.N TIC INS.1!RH ET.re.DDT. AFOEIeWCO LLC I K i _-m�-- I \ ' l I ,.1 I' I-I ev.Ian.Ave ee Hoe ea NSW enecr = i. \ I ' ! ' ' !G A6t.T OR fOe1M 1lTpN) (tI p!)i�tO.OIDD \ .J I 'Tb ,\ 1 5 \" I �10)-MORIN MOOD eISACE DIED N T!INT.RE OM ET.. > DAM A`E DE $ '^-`i ---rS---- a. I `-'ilmiimAIMIIMIllaguig 'I --- ~ 'I.`�-}� I a e+va OR nneo'MEM PLAN'EiRiETY R�ER/BURVEYOR E OlEVIbT11 AVN TC e1.0 1 m / �%4111,-� \- oudINOTCN eeom xl%7i:I=IT.• - M/ROA@1ATE LOCATICN Cr CONTNPD MST BM•1eTl • =�Mr .�I 1la =1151M ETWIL•• I ;i ce NOf Ni[IEYFD CGIITAGT DAI'�Vm UTTRICE,IG_p 3 u',. - —__� o 7..„ s�zr.=--'�� . I w4N gINId VAWWN3�EN-ev�> $ ? ,m@� =���I,111I j_�___ 1. \ r IF so• TS• i à=$ SITE STATISTICS may I '+' - ac: •30 x_ —_4(�, 1 i i ' I� \9�"I` IJ� i " II �' r�q`\ I \..'i lI y I ,•,x \ ArrvvA� I ' I -\---- 'TTLX aMEMr CEMENT- 15 x . ena,r.a,I I I it I SE. 128TH PL. peApEn AQOD CET. — _ --�' :� I 1 \ ' Z I mil\ • NO SCALE D 1 \\ _' \ L I; -�_ — I' _ W 1 I i ,'T 144 : 1711 I ' I la h oLAIE��' - T-�\a�'Q•EnNG GPO[am Z — —_� ' 1' DLDIE1SAVATE DITCH AND SNOWIER�_x .; I i N•'C.-- v� -, . ••Ir - I 1- •.•:1 1 1 2 1 Al '', 4. •'�Vu.•} �1 •` 3 �� w�_� ,r am - �� k SE 128TH ST. HALF-STREET IMPROVEMENTS °f W bj . 43 S ' 144 6\ \ :w�wna�vm@m1 NO SCATS w m iC'• ''4, kitty-VP-4'44 '_L illft.....*' ----' __‘_-r2.2_," MAIMMEIMp..Tmar4:1111.1 ...,,,,. -9 ,.;4.... ., '\ I i ''' '' ,R, _ �� \\,. •� T rrMeNr eavoRETE �•DOCK WONT I I� r. 1 ":. 11 A °O !I��� -.L roencu CURB a!AMER •.•�'nwaerTE.saaewAu- 45 46 �. ' ; "r' i sEtTmo@-s 'F re • 162ND AVE. SE HALF STREET IMPROVEMENTS 2 R 3 II , s g �I, H v 0a t o reie•1:'w --- ,w —r N 10am • MY CE COP. c uY I 27 48 I I 49 50 51 52 53 ` SHEET O F • • _ PROJECTNIRJBER 000581 ` HO Li1L 1I I AgIIIi ii Li s :.,wgIr I I LP :I III I A _ R j (�I ]NOJ.[I sot 'I , l (A 1 0 I I it! �. 11� II _ I .. 'I JIiII 111 ■I JIr.�.'*III L1iiIIJ sL CO 4 - 1,,, 1.',.. Ill II I 4 ^ ^.� o ?��Sl 1II ' .eire.., ail iiii Lz,'1 ii, P ° II % ( 1 O /, `�I ` b,A 41 a II: et, it- y n •b rn � $q^ V {h II I $$ I (; I16 = • i I:Z IdNialm ilM , ... . •,Lrw� h .r % ,'' '�'.% I ire .. e1 `� b I I .i , _ .t. ‘, 10r 1_,.;_,_17.-'1EAdO I > �� .� � p--- l -61{ / t2 / / //, � —___-_f___AYx x -- - ce9 a/�' EI l/ _ i � OnAvr I/ / / I axwslI<cv iqqI ni // I I/ / / / / /f I/ / 1 / I , i / / / I —' I/ / I i / / r/ / 1 1 // , I � / / / , , I r I / I 1 l/ I , I / / , I , ! / / / i , I // , l/ i • • O dg, i N m ;-': F t A4 S _. • • • i r K t 8 2 • • NW 1/4,NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP. 23 N,R. 5 E, W.M. DALE NOYEMBER z 2000 TREE CUTTING& CLEARING PLAN �� "°"- "`"". co?,v n DESIGNED LATE MERGANSER AMBERWOOD - CORE "'°"""""°°' ° '�ORANN E KATONA y�S"D H.yq,glgq p"Dy '° ali APPROVED NORTHWEST BROKERS,AMBERWOOD LLC. •`.........-DESIGN dO STS7 Fos 421.28525. . • .*a - CRAIG.L KRUEGER 19129 SE IISIN ST. PROJECT uAtiAGER RENTON,WA 98059 ENGINEERING• PLANNING• SURVEYING A • Issa uah School q District No. 411 ,,.... :.. .. ., .,.... 83 h7 W ., .. .. ... ... (425)' T7000.. . . .. ... .. . -.."565.:NVU Holly:Stree `saqua A 98027.289 • Superintendent Janet N. Barry, Ed. D. December 5, 2000rU-S� r°P* ONN /Wbve Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner ®EC O 8?00 City Of Renton �� 0 1055 Grady Way EivED Renton, WA 98055 Re: Amberwood Preliminary Plat Dear Ms. Higgins: In response to your letter dated December 1, 2000, requesting additional information regarding the district's ability to house students from the proposed Amberwood development, the district provides the following information. Apollo Elementary, Maywood Middle School and Liberty High School would serve the Amberwood Development. Apollo Elementary has permanent capacity for 479 K-5 students, and with portables 638 K-5 students. It now has 607 FTE students and is projected at 638 FTE students for the 2001-2002 school year. There are no additional portable sites at this school unless playground and parking spaces are used. Maywood Middle has permanent capacity for 799 FTE students and does not have space to place portables without taking up ballfields or parking spaces. It now has 835 FTE students and is projected to be at 840 FTE students for the 2001-2002 school year. Liberty High School has permanent capacity for 1,112 students and currently does not have portables. It now has 986 FTE students and is projected at 1,019 FTE students for the 2001-2002 school year. We have no plans to increase the capacity of these schools. Internal boundary adjustments may help relive the problem on a short-term basis. An additional elementary school is planned within the City of Newcastle with an anticipated opening date within the next five years. This school will help relieve Apollo's overcrowding. Board of Directors Lesley Austin•Barbara de Michele•Constance L. Fletcher•Mary Scott•Jan Woldseth r Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner December 5, 2000 Page 2 The funding of the Newcastle school requires bond funds and school impact fees. The City of Renton's failure to implement an impact fee ordinance that fully mitigates developments' share of the cost for the infrastructure will negatively impact the district's ability to construct the school. On an interim basis, students generated from new development will attend schools already at capacity. The higher density will negatively impact the schools' ability to provide students with a quality education. Hopefully, this information addresses your questions. Please call my office at (425) 837-7010 if additional information is required. Sincerely, Douglas R. Sn er Assistant Superintendent Cc: Janet Barry, Superintendent Jay Covington, Chief City Administrator / tifcY ° City of Renton ♦ ..0 ♦ Development Services Division • 'f'‘N 43 1055 South Grady Way, 6th Floor Renton, WA 98055 Date: December 6, 2000 TO: Lafe Hermansen FROM: Elizabeth Higgins, AICP Senior Planner CORE Design Development Services Div. Development/Planning Phone: (425) 885-7877 Phone: (425) 430-7382 Fax: (425) 885-7963 Fax Phone: (425) 430-7300 SUBJECT: Amberwood Preliminary Plat I Number of pages including cover sheet: 1 REMARKS: ❑ Original to ❑ Urgent ❑ As ❑ Please ® For your be mailed Requested Comment review Please make a note to correct the lot area calculations when you revise the Preliminary Plat. Lot 11 appears to be correct, most of the others appear to be incorrect. The staff report for the Dec 12th Environmental Review Committee SEPA Determination meeting is being prepared and will be based on the material originally submitted. Conditions may be ap- plied that reflect the site plan revisions mentioned in our faxed memo of 12/5/00. If you have any questions, you may call me at the above number. 4'irVArt Ahead of the curve ° O � Cityof Renton em ♦ Development Services Division • '� o• 1055 South Grady Way, 6th Floor NT% Renton, WA 98055 Date: December.5, 2000 TO: Lafe Hermansen FROM: Elizabeth Higgins, AICP Senior Planner CORE Design Development Services Div. Development/Planning Phone: (425) 885-7877 Phone: (425) 430-7382 Fax: (425) 885-7963 . Fax Phone: (425) 430-7300 ISUBJECT: Amberwood Preliminary Plat I Number of pages including cover sheet: 2 REMARKS: ❑ Original to ❑ Urgent ❑ As ❑ Please ® For your be mailed Requested Comment review Please review the following comments (see plan included herewith): • Rosario Ave NE (152nd Ave SE) must include 35' of right-of-way • We are unclear if there is an existing dedicated right-of-way. Please provide documentation from the title company (King County recording no. 5790506) as also requested in letter of 12/5/00. • The 26' access easement will require a hammerhead turnaround, 45' north and south of center line of access easement. • The half cul-de-sac will have to be relocated to serve lots 18 and 19 (no private driveway in right-of way is allowed). • All streets, including private easements that serve three or more lots,must be included in the calculation of street area and deducted from the gross site area for purposes of calculating density. • Please demonstrate that you are not exceeding the maximum density of 5.0 du per net acre. • You will have to request a modification due to "more than four lots not abutting a public street" (lots 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17). .1.V'11 Mil i. Ahead of the curve Rp ° o b I� • 7NER v�j j f'1 r---O----1 ar•k. — —1 • : r • -4 �l I I _ _ * �I/V 1 kte •\ J::1! \ k e\ •L •*"I' Ns " J ? Til W I 0 zoI WYY C a� 9' moo' • 1 16` aF 64a a . I I $. r-- - - 0�` � I Q I\ \ :' r I —rs J .�-- - 1 I 1 1 7_41.ap6O \ '6O \ ? •� -- ti� 721 1 t '0 p a, I I �1 1 1 1 7 ti) ., 4,8, x p IliP uo p (Jf �//�ti /� w i 21' 1. 1 r, �1 • LI s 1 �}► 1 f L. N xis",E A� r— o ---� r- --'$-� r-- -®- -- - .p 1 •I 1•`, \I ` I , I 1'ti —X X' I�4•oc I °`O 3- •``'' °pp I 6 1 •,0y . •`�'. EI ',� , I� I: ' Cal Gv la �4 4' •1w p �a g by .. `• ' - m-— I • 14 1204 SR 0 1204§t •`R 12 SF.a0 Ib 'f �E �I /�► ,',�L[, �/ 490 • �I pot% •1 Tr p•1w •1w et.G•`�D e` er , DOE ;rP �p / r b1 f ./ I 0 1IL •`�` 0 I I ° 1 ' •� I / I JV. _9 K�wDvr x • 4 J L ----��LJ ;4114-.:0;41V-- ---J I �O I ILO' / ,'� I1•�e • � I1243 F. .f3 ketafaCA -t�ci, E 60 S 4 Ii O �r�6 60 • .E •� 1�E• N0 I 4. ` 4XLa-- w • 1 O1'tIL _ __ .i , / u i 46I. i1 • I. +. • ' 14 I xi '� ; ! .. i / • {g 0-I-I CrCO 42 m. x I�_ 1805 SF. I �0 1 Yl=;;�::�1 1 • .n�I F / 43 61°cps E 1 1 1 l t .�- vt �W/tJG D< m m 9—___-� —_.i _ , k'. HODS$ 11 I '\ E• '\1 ! tr% a J l ct- I-- t1- 1 1 ' 1ti �7 CO w 1 ' Irl x 1 ,180E \ N.‘,. ,j p k 11 X I I •`w4 •� I�I 1 b ACCEsurn .' '�� m, Li' Spy • f r I 1 I CAR:OM'• :"' ,,L, ,E •�1. aF 1 ti E-E I M o v� ( O ` ` L--- --123—..—� I L— 1 76' ' =AiTIL 0• �\• j Beer---- --°- �) s` •�ti1. �A/G~SNAJ 44 .p I .0. .4 `-�° ��w�,1 94_ ‘ 4,:iii..eti1Ap 16 . ��•4., 6 _ _, _ 17 . 1\ . :D . g. . , 1 : I E 1 V't (AtS —�, — ¢o p crik GARAGE itKJ9 I 'L .' V �� • d� �a I -\ -- oRt i I I Ir. 1 $ —478 •t; , , I I 1 • s4 r // 2dr UT i�jl.� �1 1 I �P° 'd r SRO ,� 81 411,1 1 I ? "ACT r-N. l3Y N1.46 A ->�___� 1 RAINAGE TRACT \ 1 p Fed 9156 SF. `�_ I isr 19 j� ,,''ry��//, . —476 • �`p m 1ti S621 SF. r 0 11 l(,Y� .. .\ ' I tIM•0 at-ca ¢74 N[88'16'06"YW V 1(-1_;�e —�1 9 5-6—�p��458— ° 41:1 , H QX .GA�C� .M•OCP A I• , . - CcITY )F,RENTON ..il Plarinirig/Building/Public Works Department. . Jesse Tanner Mayor. :- Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator December 1,2000.. Mr. Doug Snyder. ::;'. . Assistant Superintendent Issaquah School District _. Issaquah, WA.98027.. Subject: . - Amberwood Preliminary Plat LUA00-150,PP,ECF , . • Dear Mr. Snyder, Thank you for providing information;regarding-'the-Issaquah School District's ability to serve new students who may live-in the',above referenced:development,a 19'.lot single family subdivision. Your response to our enquiry"states that the assigned:sch'ools, Apollo Elementary and Maywood Middle School are currently"at:capacity:" In order•;to evaluate the.subject' development proposal, the.City of Renton`:would appreciate additionalAnformationregarding the-. situation. Our questions are as:follows:= :' :=;: .:-- _:: ;,, • 1. By what means would capacity in these schools be increased? 2. If construction of additional capacity is planned,"as.per,the 2000 Capital Facilities Plan,"when would actual capacity be.available?:•, ;: • 3. If capacity will not be available at these schools by;Autumn of 2001, will the Issaquah School District provide school service by alternate means and what would these means be? • Thank you again for your continued,assistance.• If you have any questions, please contact me at (425)430-7382. Sincerely; . Elizabeth Higgins,AICP.. Senior'Planner :1055 South Grady Way :Reriton;Washington".98U55 . •. °- CITY C ' RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator November 22, 2000 Mr. Doug Snyder D�CIQy OF RENLAM" ING ToN Assistant Superintendent Issaquah.School District • 565 NW Holly Nov 3 0 2000 Issaquah, WA 98027 • RECEIVED Subject: Amberwood Preliminary Plat 1lf LUA00-150,PP,ECF The City of Renton,Development Services Division has received an application to subdivide 4.58 acres into 19 lots for detached, single-family residences. The property is located at 6001 NE 4th Street. In order to process this application, the Development Services Division needs to know which schools would be attended by children living in residences at the location indicated above. Would you please fill in the appropriate schools on the list below and return this letter to my attention, Development Services Division, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,Washington 98055. • • Elementary School: Apollo Elementary Middle School: Maywood Middle School. High School: Liberty High School • Will the schools you have indicated be able to handle the impact of the additional students estimated to come from the proposed development? Yes No Any Comments: Apollo Elementary and Maywood Middle School's are at capacity. Additional capacity will be required to house additional growth. The construction of additional capacity is planned as per the 2000 Capital Facilities Plan. The funding for the new capacity will be through school impact fees . and capital bonds. Thank you for providing this important information. If you have any questions regarding this project, please contact me at(425)430-7382. Sincerely, Ellizabeth.Higgiiis;AICP Project Manager school/ /kac 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer et, ° CITY C_ RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator November 17, 2000 RECEIVED NO/✓ , , NOV 20 '00 Superintendent's Office 1000 Renton School District #403 „ ;,;, OFFICE OF Eli 300 SW 7 SUPERINTENDEi, Street' �J�'G� Renton, WA 98055-2307 • '1 Subject: Amberwood Preliminary Plat LUA00-150,PP;ECF The City of Renton Development Services Division has received an application to subdivide 4.58 acres into 19 lots for detached, single-family residences. The property is located at 6001 NE 4th Street. In order to process this application, the Development Services Division needs to know which Renton schools would be attended by children living in residences at the location indicated above. Would you please fill in the appropriate schools on the list below and return this letter to my attention, Development Services Division, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98055. Elementary School: • Middle School: High School:- Will the schools you have indicated be able to handle the impact of the,additional students estimated to come from the proposed development? 'Yes NO • u y a Any Comments: . c�' °ra yyJ r r: 'A ... ',.a. , -,,'..a°:.14+ :/-1,e5t t( • Thank you for providing this important information. If you have any questions regarding this project, please contact me at(425)430-7382. .. Sincerely, • • Elizabeth Higgins, AICP - Project Manager ' • school/_/kac 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 :: This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer �► rR, . • r „ „� � :... 'CITY F .,RENTON' ,.� x Planning%Building/Public Works Department" Jesse Tanner,Mayor ," . . Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator December 5, 2000 Mr.:LafeHermansen " Core Design; Inc. - ' - - 4205-148th Avenue NE, #200 `.. - , ;. Bellevue,WA 98007 ." SUBJECT: Amberwood Preliminary Plate• • - • -' Project No, LUA-00-150, PP,:ECF Dear Mr:Hermansen: The Cityof Renton Property Serviceabe artment'has`provided the followingcomments - P -,Y P P . ' on the'above referenced'plat. Please direct the"Preliminary Plat corrections to my attention: "-Final Plat"items will be required following the preliminary plat approval, but prior to recording the final plat: ,:,:; Preliminary Plat comments: The legal description for the subject plat excepts the east 30 feet for.road,-However, the : • Assessor's map does not showan exception for said 30 feet.::Also, the legal description noted for the subject tax parcel;in the King County Tax Rolls only states"LESS CO ROAD.''• Please have the title company provide a copy of,King County Recording No: 5790506,which is noted in the legal description for road purposes. " • Final Plat approval requires the following: ' Note the City of Renton land use action number arid land record number, LUA-XX-XXX= FP and'LND-10-036X, respectively,on the drawing, preferably in the upper right-hand • - corner. The type size used for the land record number should be smaller than that used:, for the land use : action number;: :Please note that the land"use action number•for the final - - . . a • � plat will be different from the relimina plat and is unknown'as of.tliis date. ; '•.:"--;::;�:...:, _ --,';:`.:•-°"• ,Show ties to the City of Renton Survey Control Network. The geometry will be checked when the ties are provided. Complete City of Renton monument Cards,with reference points of all new right-of-way •' monuments set as part of this plat. _ Provide plat and lot closure'calculations. - Include a statement of equipment and procedures used,per WAC 332-130-100. ':..::,._' - -•- - - -�� -'- ��' - 5 South Grady Way Renton;Washington 98055:� .10 . - - -. �; This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer Page2of3 • •:: Indicate what has been,or is to be; set:at the`corners'of the proposed lots. • Note all easements; agreements and covenants of record on the drawing. Note discrepancies between bearings and distances of record and those;measured or calculated; if any. .. Note whether the adjoining properties are platted (give plat name and lot number)or unplatted.. : The city will provide addresses for the`proposed lots after the preliminary plat is approved: On the final plat submittal; remove all references to trees,utility facilities, topography lines . and other items not directly impacting the subdivision. These items are provided only for preliminary plat approval. Required City of Renton signatures (for approval of the plat) include the Administrator of • Planning/Building/Public Works, the;Mayor,"and the City Clerk.-An approval block for the: • City's'Finance Director is also,requ red, 'The=appropriate King County approvals need to be noted on the drawing alsoi �: >:L , The owners of the subjectplat need to sign the final'plat;document. Include notary blocks as needed. . .. Include a dedication/certification block:on.the:drawing Note that if there are'restrictive covenants or agreements to others as part of this subdivision,they can be recorded concurrently with the platY'The plat drawing and the associated document(s)are tobe:givento the Planner as a package: The plat shall have • ,the first recording.number. The recording number(s)for'the associated document(s)will ' be referenced on the plat in the:appropriate If new easements are shown for the benefiit of future owners;of the proposed lots, then • include the following statement,juxtaposed,to the;subject easements:"Area for.private . (utilities, access, etc.)easement.".Since the new,Iots created via this plat are under - "• common ownership at the time of recording there:canbe no easement until such time as. , . ,. ownership of one of the lots is conveyed to others, together with and/or subject to specific easement rights. lso •add"the'followin Declaration`of.Covenant lan ua e.onthe-face of:the` A � 9 9 _ - drawing;:if the previous_paragraph applies:;"' � .:. :....:; ' ' .: ..:. subject =DECLARATION OF COVENANT• The owners of the land embraced within this plat, in return for the benefit to; accrue from this subdivision,by signing hereon covenants and agrees to • • convey the beneficial interest in the new easement shown on this plat to any : and all future purchasers of the lots,or of any subdivisions thereof. This , covenant shall run with the land as shown on this:plat: ; ; „-:•:. • r' ::...; =, -1.. ,Propsery comments:doc Page 3 of 3 • Fee Review Comments: The Fee Review Sheet for this review of the preliminary plat is provided for your use and :.- information. Please contact me, at(425)430-7382, if you have any questions. • Sincerely; Elizabeth Higgins,AICP Senior Planner • . Propsery comments.doc - " - . . PROPERTY'`-RVICES FEE REVIEW FOR SUBDI770NS No. 2000 -Od< APPLICANT: 1d1 Iy( 1..L.c,) RECEIVED FROM_ •• .(date) JOB ADDRESS: r,c DI 1-4, 411-i• WO# 7PS75 NATURE OF WORK: I Q Lr Y Lc! i�a.1..t i l�yvnr� -pi J LND# tg PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF SUBDIVISION BY ONG PLAT, NEED MORE ORMATION: 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION SHORT PLAT,BINDING SITE PLAN,ETC. 0 PID#'s 0 VICINITY MAP O FINAL REVIEW OF SUBDIVISION,THIS REVIEW REPLACES 0 SQUARE FOOTAGE 0 OTHER PRELIMINARY FEE REVIEW DATED 0 FRONT FOOTAGE p, SUBJECT PROPERTY PARENT PID# 142'e5-9apeD 18( NEW KING CO.TAX ACCT.#(s)are required when assigned by King County. It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice,that the fees quoted below may be applicable to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are potential charges that may be due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements(i.e.underground utilities,street improvements,etc.) Triggering mechanisms for the SDC fees will be based on current City ordinances and determined by the applicable Utility Section. Please note that these fees are subject to change without notice. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of Building Permit/Construction Permit application. ❑ The existing house on SP Lot# ,addressed as has not previously paid SDC fees, due to connection to City utilities prior to existance of SDC fee Ord. SP Lot# will be .. subject to future SDC fees if triggering mechanisms are touched within current City Ordinances. ❑ We understand that this subdivision is in the preliminary stage and that we will have the opportunity to review it again before recordation. The following quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees,side sewer permits,r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PARCEL METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NO. NO. ASSESSMENT UNITS OR FEE Latecomer Agreement(pvt)WATER -p- I Latecomer Agreement(pvt)WASTEWATER(cl= )cola 40 Z1 F •• •d 4 I- Latecomer Agreement(pvt)OTHER -o - Special Assessment District/WATER /-0- ,ai—r X Ul,l r b 1- t" Special Assessment District/WASTEWATER Joint Use Agreement(METRO) -0- Local Improvement District * -o- Traffic Benefit Zones $75.00 PER TRIP,CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION FUTURE OBLIGATIONS I I -0 - SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WATER 0 Estimated #OF UNITS/ SDC FEE 0 Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) 0 Never Pd SQ.FTG. Single family residential$850/unit x 1c1 WA-i i 1:,1= vicE lb 33E" Mobile home dwelling unit$680/unit in park PF;OYItA=1 0 BY WAVER 1,15F Apartment,Condo$510/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial, $0.113/sq.ft.of property(not less than$850.00)x . Boeing,by Special Agreement/Footprint of Bldg plus 15 ft perimeter(2,800 GPM threshold) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WASTEWATER 0 Estimated ' ❑Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) 0 Never Pd Single family residential$585/unit x l.. V 43 1 I) 1 15 00 Mobile home dwelling unit$468/unit x • Apartment,Condo$350/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial$0.078/sq.ft.of property x(not less than$585.00) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SURFACEWATER 0 Estimated ❑Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) 0 Never Pd Single family residential and mobile home dwelling unit$385/unit x IQ * ?)315.00 All other properties$0.129sq ft of new impervious area of property x (not less than$385.00) PRELIMINARY TOTAL $ 611 o J Qf,( Or) !�,/ /on m o Signatur f Rev mg Authority ATE/ ►wt o0 ❑ *If subject property is within an LID,it is developers responsibility to check with the Finance Dept.for paid/un-paid status. ❑ Square footage figures are taken from the King County Assessor's map and are subject to change. ❑ Current City SDC fee charges apply to N- - 1�lo[I✓ :�� 11= 9YS -}.i( �/, cl-} f✓s. 'f o li-iGR �f✓ OL1 1/1/c7) . �-1=>=�j 4 'IDArWIu_ }-.l c�- -�l >� L1EV1 CuulCTioL c:/template/feeappl/tgb EFFECTIVE July 16, 1995/Ord.Nos.4506,4507,4508,4525,and 4526 City of S Department of Planning/Building/Public oi„ ENVIRONMENTAL It DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Po l lC.-C.. COMMENTS DUE: 12/1/00 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-150,PP,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 11/17/00 APPLICANT: Steven Beck PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth Higgins PROJECT TITLE: Amberwood Preliminary Plat WORK ORDER NO: 78756 LOCATION: 6001 NE 4th Street SITE AREA: 199,505.6 sf(4.58 acres) I BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has proposed subdividing a 199,505 square foot(4.58 A) property, by means of the Preliminary Plat process, into 19 lots skitable for detached, single-family residences. An existing house and out-buildings would be removed. Access would be from NE 4t Street to the north, via Rosario Avenue NE, and an extension of NE 3`d Court to the west. Environmental review is required and a public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services ./ Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet lin LatrnA Lm C-F B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional inform tion is needed to properly assess this proposal. 0 /Z-P-M Signature of Director or Authori d epresentative Date Routing Re, ' W- •' 411L City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL&DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department: Transportation Comments Due: 12/1/00 Application No.: LUA-00-150,PP,ECF Date Circulated:11/17/00 Applicant: Steven Beck Project Manager:Elizabeth Higgins Project Title: Amberwood Preliminary Plat Work Order No: 78756 Location: 6001 NE 4th St. Site Area: 199,506.6 sf(4.58 acres) Building Area(gross): A.Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments No comment. B.Policy-Related Comments No comment. C. Code-Related Comments Transportation improvements will be required which include but are not limited to curb, gutter, sidewalks, street paving and street lights per City of Renton Standards/Codes. The above street improvements are required on all existing streets abutting the plat as well as within the plat. Traffic mitigation fees of$75/trip will be required(see attached calculation fee for this project$13,637.25). Le.A, e , �s�1 /1 Z 8—Go Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date g P Lual5Oplc el 57 • • - • • On c T MI O ::A.vw::n�}:,.}••ter}i}}}:i?{.}r:r}:?:::::::rry •nv:•;?v::?•::::•:::•::?:•::?:+v::::....:..i...v......v r.v.v•:i:.}}:�i'•:::r::::::n}x}}i:?^:}}}}:fiiv:rv}::r?.}:y,.}w:..'•i}}:•}:•'r?:6'f.?'v}:• ......{........:r..v}n:?•::.. r..n... , .....x:r.:i•vr:1 j { ?r:..,.•:::.:.ri:. .'?.{.i?.•}.:.nr:y..:v...:.............?.{.}.}.}.�..:..}:w...?..:.:..}.;.....r..}.... ..?.;r:v.:..:.:.r:r:..:..:..:.::.:.:,.v...vn.},•�::•::v:.::.:..}:.•r..:•+};:.:..}:.}i}:••}.:.•};-}. ::.•....?.......:...........y..:.........r.:.fi....:.t ;.:....;.r. i:.}.::.i.:::::::•::::•.'.ti...}:,�:.,:}{:r..•}:}{ i n:i:•:{x : Project Name ttltileDcR.\Mav Geltnn�ti� �( Project Address book NE 4 Contact Person 1VC-N beCAG Address icl aq % 1'-‘544" STCZ�s`�C Ittankm g1W59 Phone Number -77O ` 122100 Permit Number LOIN - ®b (50 ?le eel Project Description t't 1--t7T SF vittohAt PI AA- Land Use Type: Method f Calculation: ❑ Residential ITE Trip Generation Manual (-6'4` Cbtn0° ❑ Retail 0 Traffic Study (Zt w) sr t stoe-" ❑ Non-retail 0 Other 61_57 • Calculation: l l v3 675 _ 713,O3 . • • 1 Eb�T (.DAz -nN 1'ro�sE �i s x `l,5`7 = `71�, 5> \-1 .alo 4v s= Transportation Mitigation Fee: is 1 Z.)(1'1 • ,50 Calculated by: fi. vvvau Date: 1\ I.20 )'UuD • • Account Number: Date of Payment M I LI 7 ti-CY p G ........-... ....... ::>; Project Name AllABoRvi r_ PYQ\IMIILA Project Address &OD1 '1 44 - 06- Contact Person `.EVEN CC- Address 1cl IL15 k STYas`O" Anm qi 5`I Phone Number a,53--Po ` 27100 Permit Number LOPs Ob j ?v eel Project Description tq LT SF ?02.4. t h PIT Land Use Type: Method of Calculation: ❑ Residential ITE Trip Generation Manual L'- G1 1O13 0 Retail 0 Traffic Study (Zt u) SF 12.is c_ ❑ Non-retail 0 Other Cj_S7 Calculation: l SA ?23 • • -max �� . u s t3,u37, aS Transportation Mitigation Fee: Calculated by: 4. �cY /J Date: 1\ I.20 )'wro Account Number: Date of Payment M City of R.. ...i Department of Planning/Building/Public 1111 ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: -ire_ preu ('urn COMMENTS DUE: 12/1/00 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-150,PP,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 11/17/00 APPLICANT: Steven Beck PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth Higgins PROJECT TITLE: Amberwood Preliminary Plat WORK ORDER NO: 78756 Lor LOCATION: 6001 NE 4th Street E SITE AREA: 199,505.6 sf(4.58 acres) I BUILDING AREA(gross): r SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has proposed subdividing a 199,505 square foot( proPe , b iLeggf the Preliminary Plat process, into 19 lots sgitable for detached, single-family residences. An existin house and out-buildings woulc be removed. Access would be from NE 4t Street to the north, via Rosario Avenue NE, and-an ext nsion lt. Environmental review is required and a public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Exami er. 1 OF RENTON FIRE DEPARTMENT A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare - Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet t id lit— —1-o d C IS Ala V / B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS , I C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS .1.e._ „Iv,/ 0:0,0.iivicf We have -viewed this application •ith particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where adiitional information is nee to properly assess this proposal. Si' . -re of Director or Authorized Repr•sentative Date 0 6 fild Ro • Rev.10/93 M lib • ,VY .s. 0 + ® . CITY OF RENTON 4, N�o� FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: November 20, 2000 TO: Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Plannerpil Q� FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal v6 SUBJECT: Amberwood Preliminary Plat, 6001 NE 4th St. MITIGATION ITEMS; 1. A fire mitigation fee of$488.00 is required for all new single family structures. FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS; 1. A fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single family structures. If the building square footage exceeds 3600 square feet in area, the minimum fire flow increases to 1500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structures. 2. Roadway turnaround for this size plat requires a full 90 foot diameter/plp f' cul-de-sac. P' Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. C04 City of Ren:_.. Department of Planning/Building/Public W_..._. ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1W o etc ceAieIOFDILLA CCOMMENTS DUE: 12/1/00 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-150,PP,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 11/17/00 _ APPLICANT: Steven Beck PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth Hidgin i t n;'":.-:. PROJECT TITLE: Amberwood Preliminary Plat WORK ORDER NO: 78756 LOCATION: 6001 NE 4th Street 1 NOv st,® 2000 IECONOMIC D v SITE AREA: 199,505.6 sf(4.58 acres) BUILDING AREA(gross): NEIGF{p ,ELG gyE;17 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has proposed subdividing a 199,505 square foot(4.58 A) property, y ens-af.t"e Preliminary Plat process, into 19 lots skitable for detached, single-family residences. An existing house and out-buildings would e removed. Access would be from NE 4t Street to the north, via Rosario Avenue NE, and an extension of NE 3`d Court to the west. Environmental review is required and a public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water _ Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities _ _ Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 5 I r e i 3 1p N e-n.i/t7cO ,0( r/12_6J l 4 2. 1 1-vG 2tC.N 7-of-&-rill- U G7 i on.) F(-CJr-ti i\-1--E G-i2o 55 / G/-1 Fa c2 5T 2t-1-7 5 //.9J'B41-S LO"i.,l . t t \S lUvZ C (5-n-n_ 3\-V m c - -11-1-2 /A-cG.-L5SS L \-5EY`1 iW7 W/'fS OGOuc-T 83s•-) . No 07H- z—_Po Li c-( I ssu CS . Cog-Sr fell-1 i C.PZA-vviv/rtrc_ C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where I ioforrn Lion is needed to properly assess this proposal. / / /) Signs ur Direct or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 01 o� \,— •t FOG UNE OGE OF CONCRETE*OM 4- USW FI to — — — BER OPTIC I ` s . NER 9AR i_ r---QQ----� �� `_ _� r § �4`. I 301 I 1 \1 w � <nR.� I a I I cn �P 1m m1 Im \ PL m I � I I I ulwl I u \ ry6F I• 13'I� �. I I ; n, I W�. I �., I 1 1 N I J I N \\ 38 I m 1 , L— 2 i o I J d I w I \ I 2 Sp ® 115 J cZi EIw9I > I Z \ OP. s r-- ---- —� 1> 01 ,4 rI .0 M• •�°4 • I I •A0 I 1 4 t I I p,. . I {� XI I ry498 I v 10 I L______ I L__ I i I I ----_ L-1S _ I P 1364 8 P a x J •'�-- — 1 X I _I I. •e, 60 ` 60 , •� --- -- 31 �21 I �\ I\ 4 I I I w i �_ , ---rno— _ JJI! \� �I��� 43 e0 bo ` ���I���� 05 21 Ilc° \ \o I • I-- — -•`- — •or 1 I 1 �, \ —x�x I1E•°` i. •`° •�`'� I,G •bP , gP�� ,;�yE •.�� i •`� 1 '�ry� I\ 40t. s 1 ; I • o • I I•� •\ I o '; 11—— 0 -- , � \ti • 1 490 P�\�P I ¢ P•\k •\k • I yG �±�_�1 I 1 •\ \� - ----� L- _—__.bi_J • P I L• • j a �I I \ 11 / II \') 1 1 60 b w.` .F ¢.�•�` •E .F °'\S\ '�.``�eE W \0 I I 1 60 ti $ I W I I • �.— 4 I� 1 pa 1 ... •.• I 1 / I J 1 64 1 �..y^ / / • w \� 42 .. 11= 1805 SP. I \0 I r 7 ;:.! I I \6 I ° •` I `r \ 486 E 1 im ti" I • — LI--I--.. _J L :� • ' 13 s L7.I A8 1 • • I iI ' ><tT ! ' / in I \ x 1 '1805 sFS, a I �0 I I '• •o'w.""'°" I 1 I I b'ACCESSAITI ITY�s'` i, I x I • 1 I ' •\a� •+� ' , a..� T , Y;. yawl \ I CARPORT•+; GARA •,• ' \ co 1 \aP 16 490 K t2 h• .. d r -- -- 4- _______ 14, —IC' — , AG •�AV°\ 'Coe ��\\ E , oRr /,/ 4 I cileF. I t Ptt`4 56UNI5� 1rl �1- I r sa ur / (L� \ 1'4 V'�)C4.1 � 01 I, —../ / I � O� JVfl a8c IN .2 a / al �. Jg)V b _„n11�1 46 •,TRACT A r �..\`_---- 4 A I �J /� �ltL 1�?,' DRAINAGE TR.QCT t�/v ,s-Q\�� M)Y J tiP '�� 9J86 8R 1 1 vs'-'‘ (�,f \LJv_ (z b'' \ '1_ v �+ 19 V" \ �\—_ / to I� - 474 • o2 ; ' • j.5� �- ov------ "-��iir71'i0 iii�ti�llvii'i�i'iiiie�-s- � _ �'-"�'��'_� � A' pppy c i ,�o ./,"I,Cpeo n1Y 80 16,'�p~ W T'�04--•• ° APC 'iR 11110 • City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL&DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department:Surface/Wastewater Comments Due: 12/1/00 Application No.: LUA-00-150,PP,ECF Date Circulated:11/17/00 Applicant: Stever},.Beck Project Manager:Elizabeth Higgins, Project Title: Amber.wwQoslP el ninary Plat Work Order No: 78756 Location: 6001-NE`4 h—St. Site Area: 199,506.6 sf(4.58 acres) Building Area(gross): A.Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code)Comments No comment. B.Policy-Related Comments No comment. • C. Code-Related Comments ' e 9 Surface Water: AC5 e The drainage plans an temporary erosion/sedimentation plans shall be in accordance with the KCSWDM as ado to the City of Renton. Surface water(SDC) fees of$525/single family lot will be required. Wastewater: The site will be required to extend the sanitary sewer main from the Maplewood Estates Plat to serve this plat. Sidesewer stubs to each lot in the plat will be required at a cost of$60/each. East Renton Interceptor sewer charge(SAD) fees will be required. East Renton Interceptor extension latecomer fees will.be required. Wastewater(SDC)fees of$760/single family lot will be required. 4644,t,LA —0° Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Lua15Op1a 010 e City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL&DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Depai tment:Surface/Wastewater Comments Due: 12/1/00 Application No.: LUA-00-150,PP,ECF Date Circulated:11/17/00 Applicant: Steven Beck Project Manager:Elizabeth Higgins Project Title: Amberwood Preliminary Plat Work Order No: 78756 Location: 6001 NE 4111 St. Site Area: 199,506.6 sf(4.58 acres) Building Area(gross): A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments No comment. B. Policy-Related Comments No comment. C. Code-Related Comments Surface Water: The drainage plans and temporary erosion/sedimentation plans shall be in accordance with the KCSWDM as adopted by the City of Renton. Surface water(SDC) fees of$525/single family lot will be required. Wastewater: The site will be required to extend the sanitary sewer main from the Maplewood Estates Plat to serve this plat. Sidesewer stubs to each lot in the plat will be required at a cost of$60/each. East Renton Interceptor sewer charge (SAD) fees will be required. East Renton Interceptor extension latecomer fees will be required. Wastewater(SDC) fees of$760/single family lot will be required. r -g 1/—Z8—00 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Lua15Op1a 11110 O City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Depattiuent: Water Comments Due: 12/1/00 Application No.: LUA-00-150,PP,ECF Date Circulated:11/17/00 Applicant: Steven Beck Project Manager:Elizabeth Higgins Project Title: Amberwood Preliminary Plat Work Order No: 78756 Location: 6001 NE 4th St. Site Area: 199,506.6 sf(4.58 acres) Building Area(gross): A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments No comment. B. Policy-Related Comments No comment. C. Code-Related Comments The site will be served by King County Water District#90. Plans will be required per City of Renton Standards and will need signature approval by City staff for construction permits. /l 2 8—o O Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Lua15Op1b City of Department of Planning/Building/Publia ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMM-Lai Se4\J. COMMENTS DUE: 12/1/00 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-150,PP,ECF 1 DATE CIRCULATED: 11/17/00 APPLICANT: Steven Beck PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth Higgins PROJECT TITLE: Amberwood Preliminary Plat WORK ORDER NO: 78756 LOCATION: 6001 NE 4th Street SITE AREA: 199,505.6 sf(4.58 acres) BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has proposed subdividing a 199,505 square foot(4.58 A) property, by means of the Preliminary Plat process, into 19 lots syitable for detached, single-family residences. An existing house and out-buildings would be removed. Access would be from NE 42 Street to the north, via Rosario Avenue NE, and an extension of NE 3` Court to the west. Environmental review is required and a public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet jS B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS EMENTS ir) /is Nv1//11/te- ./e )f)Y' 7-0 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 40(Ai415t17ael•-• / /77A6 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date P Routing Rev.10/93 • A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS "It is anticipated that the proposed development would generate future residents that would utilize existing City park and recreation facilities and programs. The City has adopted a Parks Mitigation Fee of$530.76 per each new single family lot to address these potential impacts." V. City of Ren$Department of Planning/Building/Public Wo; ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 'o v\s-t vu-c t,prn SeJA/I.0 A COMMENTS DUE: 12/1/00 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-150,PP,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 11/17/00 APPLICANT: Steven Beck PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth Higgins PROJECT TITLE: Amberwood Preliminary Plat WORK ORDER NO: 78756 Cy)j. LOCATION: 6001 NE 4th Street ��� SITE AREA: 199,505.6 sf(4.58 acres) I BUILDING AREA(gross): �� ,1 . --11, SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has proposed subdividinga 199 505 square foot(4.58 A) b ans of PP , P P q euY� Preliminary Plat process, into 19 lots suitable for detached, single-family residences. An existing house and out-builds would We removed. Access would be from NE 4 Street to the north, via Rosario Avenue NE, and an extension of NE 3`d Court to t evilest. Environmental review is required and a public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner. j'A, A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities _ _ Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS Oit(C C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additi al information is needed to properly assess this proposal. f>y,,i,:ie, /7 hef/0 7) Sig ure of Director AuttioLecesentative Date Routing Rev.10/93 CITY =�iF RENTON , • - . Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Ntayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.;Administrator • November 17, 2000• Mr. Lafe Hermansen : Core Design, Inc. , • 4205—148th Avenue NE, #200 Bellevue, WA 98007 SUBJECT: Amberwood Preliminary Plat - Project No: LUA-00-150,PP,ECF .- Dear Mr. Hermansen: • ;The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the.Environmental Review Committee on - December 12, 2000 Prior to 'that_'review,'>you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue'processing your application. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington, on January 16, 2001 at 9:00 AM to consider the proposed Preliminary Plat.- The applicant or representative(s) of the,applicant is required ,to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing: If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. • Please contact me, at(425) 430-7382, if you have any questions.• Sincerely, Elizabeth Higgins,AICP• Senior Planner • cc: Mr. & Mrs. David Johnson/Owners Mr:Steven Beck/Amberwood, LLC • Ace ptonoo . 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 - ; Page 2 Received: 11 / 1 /00 3:52PM; 4258857i63 -> Northwest Brokers; 1'NUV. 1.200030 2:50PM CORE I'`� I;;N INCJTON ' ' -'21`10,.621300 P.21,04/07 4 w wv lS ( •rr ret: ,>Y g J'Wh 1i1 �g p: rA< `�' Uiw "�;IdYd' h 1w 4q'o�'e :5•'I'Jbi " , 1��Olt lY Fn 4�". 3. -1 4 x'�'n. :�.„ a •;M 4*yryR � 14J 14-4„ �!.. .i.1 . �` I k51o1Ti • ,i01 4I1 ft ^ ' M",30, t� Eµ .IlM !a a v,ll,3lhNl. Marv��yq ''hY,h' Nhn I nti , T .� � � �v ti IIx x aM' a vu J +aI,yn, .,:.uiV::;. 4.0nt�M �•��''�Wi° ;e`�tin'!�1�.„"x11� c c � aQ1�ar 1 .„,', x•m1,nvwY:i.n} 'hh..I' ;,`i�nT nJ i 'e �ia9 1/I� y� „��' KDV . 410 , :kH- n''Irii W. M F �f �. q � � li � Mh1M �..a� ". I`l4ir•it.lNf1 y q,,vlwq ��`+l 4ri %:r3r4 kx4u �a� p� .{ �!u,•.' p�mqd� �•xa•ZPI n•MI�I'� . ; �jn' IN�' �.ul: ; ,1,FI , ' PCu Rita l ry P::. Iih' I ,I 1 I , 4 � JI,' '0 u 'I� {' rIF 1, I ' � $ 1 N1 Aa� ±�;M' .„ } 'p 'xE,, it ,, I I"ha':!i.a 1,1 f I d FI sl , I, ';, M . " ' Ay „.a:la y w Y.t:;4, ,l*i v yip ":14u« <:`^ I 4k...1, yI J.>. ..a..;m ___41 .. $„ G"�I ,4 • I �ruilt,:rd.,4 , S. eril.' , nk.,e ms" , itJ..0 >S%''AyWa fdlA / 1 0, YP. .e.ti t MIA, ..IMF� .a4 ,., llia,`1.' 4 .,,87 : igI ;, l; . PROJECT NAME: A/Al55141bbv PreA1IMl RAliki PLr APPLICATION NO: LW . 00. 150 i Pp The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will•notlfy these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 1 , • F''�'ti�J,• • (Attach additional sheets,if necessary) Received: 11 / 1 /00 3:53PM; 4258857963 -> Northwest Brokers; Page 3 NOV. 1.2000"3 2:50PM CORE ]' '•,GN INC'ITON 251O.623309 P•3'.65i07 (Continued) • NAME. ' ADDRESS' ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER • j� Applicant Certification i4 6+euen 'e aCt< _ ,hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) _ e\\\\owners and their addresses were obtained from: J��72; 4 �°,4 0 Title Company Records %QP :,\SSIO,),... �I•�j King County Assessors Records : o NotaRy 4 Signed • Date /f! © B IC m (Applicant) �4 '•�� % t �• 7s_°- •tea s NOTARY °°°�'\wASMN - ATTESTED: bscribed and sworn before me,a Notary Public,In and for the State of Vl�a�hTngton, residing at/�Leyr_p_ 0.0u,\ on the day of, ?JoVErn 4i 4 2O .... Signed (7a cLQim.� /J) . 1 9 - •G�n — r (Notary Public) '1 Jeadd+ \;'' EEC' If p Ai5•C'a••,„ Z:�,"1,`•`d1: i ^'' 11 h!tt� Fyl "�ti Iv d'i !u, :,ali ..1+>� r � � '"d �..+� C m. C�vY a iln f14:i b ' Ih a:.. rtt. a i,4 /i1Sr' le`{ ,;.. +•, w "M �J, 5 4 y �L.,E!<, i.L�4.,, i. _ 1.. • iY I., 'a i., fi { ' ', I ti,f„ • •t• .. 'V,h I r h,'.11 '1.. �r��,,,� . 'a:111•r7*.•,r , ',N q Kr > }� p..r',t�� ', , Ph ;t1' , V�, khw�K :: S r4 `I ;�Vr.'ti..z N�. ,., e� �'� "i�? ' �yi!l1 ��,`����,t,�Y� w• n'o,� >:� '�yfh"{a4�' '�r 7JgM,{t� o, �'+ =fit ''4N�,'� a to I 1 I ,4. b•;,> n 1' I. "IJ...ar�ai::i +t+ +],.. ,1!1'; •..4!a4it ,;,,,'.`wV,i1AiIre �kgm,I . _a�! < " +'�'ftt;,, Fh'.sr;`�,`G ktleir"�'�`i�„"U';',"A�rl�iw4xjd:'E�2�i';� ��'�'�+Ip I IN hlv4hl�w`i1v � �.r 1 0101111,0P4.' ,c"u* : lasf`S,i.V'"r!' r-..Ky,:�'•yw;�'�..:�' I+. 1L•_' .I," �{'•K�^•f•AY "1• arFn•rtllR 14f at,> > t;Z IIhpI�tyA'In•'lll.�'4 �y,,,,l�,;' h I� I ��6pM tr Al4 .Yt"�', "', I,." ',I�hi+! iiiili,N.('aai'Ti7n''iSW\d :",'.1. 'S• a+L,•'l. I A r x il!d •,R,\1� 11MI NId G'I F1' rSttR`t, ii .obi 1 •JV v 1r. ?,,1'' -0 tl . 11•{y.. '� Irl, by li_ q i>7 i�r$,r .rl gI 161 rVY 'i. F IIII II I �FJ rAlh44+� ff \ +.•,' I F' hl, 2,', 1 �, I •iOistt.°° >r T p,'.`: �rw11 .it 11'P v� lY' t.:A l , tu:c 'a,d'S a155i�Fwl I , ,.� I �';�.ca!r IVII v'r qw•,,,•Orr bh'a b�l!�Y ,��I �:'''� >i�.���nt� ��:, {'.''I.•a 111 "$y4�i. a � .' Sd h ,.f�` �drB`{, cm M':a. non-. . 9' I• `F..> 1' I Y, Ib hObl II >� t' r. I•tt •Ifle.. d 'Iq,'>'+N..F•q^',tnar ,, ,'Y{•I�,`,,l', I• . �N bl .j�}$ riri T d '�� N't` p A, 1 rl I,,''f.A.i I .,,,-- -,,,, ...,�Af '' , I iq 1 t '�� 9dEV'• .�• •�rN �IM t'�m� Yt' ���'+• la 1�� `4�• r�t :e ,1 v J�ii����}} � me E.. 1"'1, �n 1 h� II" If It•I�A/bW .,{r1'iNf"• x: I,,,,, r• S4 I} ' .ti..1 .y". •n , L1A{<,ry 'ra'4,..04 P•.oJr \i11.+,,.,,, • •V yJI•;(3, t,.:•,jsr 1 1. .d..il`.aV4V YI 01b1ip•,4kft3.34��"f,, `Vi'�s 4,.., ... ! IAA }fit CV., M«,..�+,1� - •.r, �Y`r[.a,yyyI'��ppyd�� ��,,yy v '• /'.F �: , JYi � � f�N•i3A' '�tt�'1i�i &`'ylx�'�,,r,•gairrYl tl<Diu\' R ` �'-sri, 4 ?� d+i'I�l1,Ta��iC4Y �ty J .q. -,.taw < , '1"�'xtil?/.'a`',a:4 <: -. tikL`1i r 4 l4ar' E` pr . .y+£`,,�?.r�''a4 IJy1y11�r!t.,w#I,qeo�' E7 ).4,1(I,b1` >'.•• ,. N•:' fi` J , ,4 4-t fy •k>•, M+�F'',,4 I,. ,0 �I,- yr ��t,,:dip •��rd. ",ik01.1 r5TU;�i� 1••t5•.•. •3,. .ti:-.>',4�N:Fr''k]4'•nil 4.N.el 4: �1'�n�'t .',hIN:I.JY •i �1 ,II,ill.: ^A„ !1 ..:. ', �i�?iI+NM'IUn$lr 'Y2f li11{t+4!41 r aK*11,t4 ,WVag •II•11 Wy4 [WI<< �, '" �I ,I{ b,' Y n Ir G'%.i:1.# .,•4 i fYt'•,wx w,g {..., ��e,i .f}$ 01.{, 1'T4.-?•f f "P Idr.l 4• �1 1 nY{ !I.µ, y+Mel 'p tr D 1i ,ry, .I WL,ih.ry.F1 W FYhI{.11•h )q ' .> tn4.:1 F ��.Hh,pD �R +I P. A In 14'T.Op'hlj! +.1� K 4AY ♦t i N' 41W d AI$ .tt:�n�� \����nhM{'M ryMM I�'11 ed.;,. >w :.+ I ,u .0 4.at,.ctta 3' I°^'• :I y vas' 'd 14"1 1'.4 "k• •� F+.: ,,t. _ .'�n4'•ei�i It t a��, Rf��'c`314 •> A II"rl hY 1 n�#ti'0''Al 7E'<"": }''a 1 m µ ,�� 1{a•;S11 ,r5"�'� rx�. 1 i.,, 'ij'w" r:, •,.•�'^�I•:fh�i:.�'1'r","191�Y��I; n�'b 4.'4 4 r~ h i... l.!..,'Mbliii:IIFllh+k�.'.'w`igi ir'116 .Ar Q1•, h 9kdti a-.0,W Ttgirp I 1111y �454`+^a�ci.;�tl >! k!:!^IRS I'tdl v,lS V A ah F,h4 hnYto., I ,I tr •,+1i7 vj Y•,rnr` 1• JyI.i�1,'!t,�I1 dery I^„ ,,I.: ,i yam,^'ij ^a4,%..� n1 'M t i'�'I I ,`Ip? •hot 4tn. d•• 'nl@I I{oil N "� �' q 116EI k'Fnnl I I�+a4• k` h,'9 7 '4 ,dddxl'�'h�Y�xY•r If..}• q,�, .4,!,�` ''1{� WIn� FI^w A•�''+'�•4Cr r� � bw '�� law4>d I 't ':�`!k"�.r''�•'};�dF,w�:!mbldw�'hl{� ' ,e, e I � 1a6�'� k'd ?x' i 'id I i' '7{. «q�.. jjj$$,,�,,�/1.pc�!a,•{•Wr^i� n.a',�• Frye .gyp R px j,.,.^;�vy�. �%a4�r111a�iF�a��4_{MLa .��� ' ' � ,• pILA.,7i",'�y1�/'w�lU'�f' �aw ,. . �`�3:�,1� �` /� OFF);•vi 'Y /I."M 1I II I ♦Ik.h.,(F i ?,� 11' ,d, .h cje: �,+ti.Q.', ' , „t* t >rylitM' j 1 S.4 .: ,.+' JI I ',Ity { S t.441 I�.�ttyluyek:4A 1 I {I 'IA 1 L .+K' �� M.1 •W Y •h'AAI Y1•'�.•r��{'' •4., +I'I'\ YP 41•11�I 'M,'I�rWrC; C 1 �TP ►! �F 1 a� i a +ab ,� Kt•�St•rl I. �>n41 h m �JI�!•.. ^a$rr�^eN ._�"'•� 'r•.txx,..,:` aat' r• ��dI �,51 ! •y w� �w i!66{�+{,�°�"�G ^,•. 'S'� dlb' tl{1`' );{: "•J'JiiMitlltriwk> F I',° •'7.t +1' 'tiil«IYii•"� 141 rvpnTt"i^'ii':.+ V:C ra�r >w i y�c >. { �r 1 }b,�j f,�M Ij�f'«'`'O �t h�^ F„ �.,g1 �,4F•„ "%",�'n�n tier. I�pf+I •41'H�'''µ"J• obs—whi :>ieT1e y� a•.,4i'r,,r�w�,y' y. iK > '�' !l� �}1„G� ?1M,�,I!�y1 ' 10�°�did,., fo 4a 't>,„,, • t;n ,...,/" I 1 RWS�I i; {y; a i,5 14.4,:,�,•,�,,''j,.i, �: F{y+{r +1,� Jo :i'da giv 4. �i' {`'�' , . raa,, it A i.i dA 1 I• 4yrld ,4•�{ I•h,�,it ttl JJIF• _ F..� I I { dy,' ��,ii � 4W 11 ha 1 1 :�. �y •�,�:wtr•hI I Fd � Ir lhr . A,r rr I iqyy' N+P. 'fir �� 1 I II'id"d4 rn,�, `�, M'a Awb MI,H t ' bbM llll�gybw+bl}'li,•�4y.t'+7�i^4$-i��v> bJ�°+'I yyyI i{ Ir:{ii�'• ".'{Cbrr� � A�Iial7h°iD'rr�1 Iix' }'r y�& Y� ,,�I {tli,.�......... E a. pt 1 ',j q Iq ,�,,.d., pIh4,• { hhl rldl'' 1 I{iv hNt•X•>tx••-a del'!ph� ��yy jj�I,,�� ^�,y�, d {•.ri•,.�. u1:p b hbl I to q,�i.• U/; { +AA 't:i*,�xx . p.,,r I.'yi ��, it. A �I'Y��pI�PV11a �$:"'>PCh^}• l(r 4i4'9!7 7� I �' y1W'S'F" >,o..} 1. ,Y�/�.Ip I bh�,I I , '1 p rp1 .1 'tM I14119�,{wa.,.,Ad '} •f��•.Ia doll •A'tViri ' "et< 4 n ptkojto 1 to dJuM II,'4 .0.4 i, ^'1^ ,►`'1.,�,l'u'q fj' hl ,(�11� I KE r S"d .V�und .I 'I,16 A t4!l' j' P in h'A1d. #0-2 ,w• �rM ,�(�;, 1 •� .�L�'+rr I 'E r„�• a >iiala�rrr„„„��'''�����I�.,I�n F�A��q{ a 1 'if ;``V;V9+�'�.. i V fi� Y�, v1.1. .{ , n „I. „},,,,.,�'Lli'"�: �:'�,t;I:u�l'«�r�"'w'•,,,,• 1 111 nl �•• �t. oh7,� M• 110ProP.60 MARILYN CHEFF T Iry ONO MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29.03 • J # 1 * MetroScan / King * Owiier :J W Morrison Inc Parcel #- :112305 9004 02 Site :*No Site Address* Sale Date . Mail :PO Box 407 Kenmore Wa 98028 Sale Price . Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$19, 050 Lgl :STR 112305 TAXLOT 4 W 1/2 OF SE Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac:19.05 YB: Ph: # 2 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Centex Homes Parcel # :112305 9011 03* Site :14832 SE 128Th St Renton 98059 Sale Date :05/25/1999 Mail :2320 130Th Ave NE #200 Bellevue Wa 98005 Sale Price :$2,520, 000 Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$300,000 Lgl :STR 112305 TAXLOT 11 E 1/2 OF SW Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:720 Ac:18. 16 YB:1946 Ph: # 3 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Ribera-Balko Enterprises Family Limited Parcel # :112305 9015 09 Site :5715 NE 4Th P1 Renton 98059 Sale Date :12/31/1991 Mail :16400 Southcenter Pkwy #308 Seattle Wa 98188 Sale Price . Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$182, 000 Lgl :STR 112305 TAXLOT 15 SW 1/4 OF SW Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ /1 Stories:1 BldgSF:1,590 Ac:1.96 YB:1963 Ph: # 4 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Olding Terry L Parcel # :112305 9017 07 Site :466 Nile Ave NE Renton 98059 Sale Date :01/28/1991 Mail :12614 148Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price . Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$127, 000 Lgl :STR 112305 TAXLOT 17 NW 1/4 OF SW Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:1,330 Ac: .70 YB:1930 Ph: # 5 * MetroScan / King * Owner :The Mullins Family Trust Parcel # :112305 9018 06 Site :5800 NE 4Th St Renton 98059 Sale Date :03/16/1998 Mail :18631 120Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98058 Sale Price . Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$125,000 Lgl :STR 112305 TAXLOT 18 W 1/2 OF SE Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:1,200 Ac:1.05 YB:1931 Ph: # 6 * MetroScan / King * Owner :The Mullins Family Trust Parcel # :112305 9020 02 Site :*No Site Address* Sale Date :03/16/1998 Mail :18631 120Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98058 Sale Price . Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$75, 000 Lgl :STR 112305 TAXLOT 20 E 1/2 OF SE Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac:1.05 YB: Ph: # 7 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Mullenberg Dean J/Carolyn L Trustees;Utd Parcel # :112305 9021 01 Site :5816 NE 4Th St Renton 98059 Sale Date :02/13/1998 Mail :5816 NE 4Th St Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price . Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$136, 000 Lgl :STR 112305 TAXLOT 21 W 1/2 OF NE Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 B1dgSF:1,290 Ac:1.26 YB:1943 Ph: # 8 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Mullenberg Dean J/Carolyn L Trustees;Utd Parcel # :112305 9023 09 Site :*No Site Address* Sale Date :02/13/1998 Mail :12622 148Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price . Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$85, 000 Lgl :STR 112305 TAXLOT 23 E 1/2 OF NE Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac:1.26 YB: Ph: # 9 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Lackey Charles Parcel # :112305 9030 00 Site :*No Site Address* Sale Date . Mail :5902 NE 4Th St Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price . Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$175, 000 Lgl :STR 112305 TAXLOT 30 S 378.8 FT OF Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .97 YB: Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. # 10 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Ng Properties Llc Parcel # :112305 9093 04 Site :*No Site Address* Sale Date :01/17/1996 Mail :6234 139Th P1 SE Bellevue Wa 98006 Sale Price :$93,000 Full Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$115, 000 Lgl :STR 112305 TAXLOT 93 S 227 FT OF Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac:1.55 YB: Ph: # 11 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Rogers Mark C & Lynnette M Parcel # :142305 9003 00 Site :15240 SE 132Nd St Renton 98059 Sale Date :10/24/1990 Mail :15240 SE 132Nd St Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price . Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$298,000 Lgl :STR 142305 TAXLOT 3 W 595.72 FT OF Q:NW S:14 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/1 / Stories:2 BldgSF:2, 600 Ac:4.50 YB:1986 Ph:425-255-3107 # 12 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Finer Homes Inc Parcel # :142305 9004 09 Site :*No Site Address* Sale Date . Mail :1215 120Th Ave NE #201 Bellevue Wa 98005 Sale Price . Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$288, 000 Lgl :STR 142305 TAXLOT 4 W 1/2 OF NE Q:NW S:14 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac:14.43 YB: Ph: # 13 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Buttar Baljinder/Rashpal Parcel # :142305 9016 05 Site :148Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Sale Date :10/05/1999 Mail :5766 146Th Ave NE Bellevue Wa 98007 Sale Price :$430,000 Full Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$120,000 Lgl :STR 142305 TAXLOT 16 N 500 FT OF W Q:NW S:14 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: 481dgSF: Ac:4.21 YB: Ph: # 14 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Finer Homes Inc Parcel # :142305 9017 04 Site :*No Site Address* Sale Date . Mail :1215 120Th Ave NE #201 Bellevue Wa 98005 Sale Price . Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$592, 000 Lgl :STR 142305 TAXLOT 17 W 1/2 OF W Q:NW 5:14 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac:29. 62 YB:, Ph: # 15 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Ribera-Balko Enterprises Family Limited Parcel # :142305 9021 08 Site :5845 NE 4Th St Renton 98059 Sale Date :12/31/1991 Mail : 16400 Southcenter Pkwy #308 Seattle Wa 98188 Sale Price . Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$248, 000 Lgl :STR 142305 TAXLOT 21 E 225 FT OF N Q:NW S:14 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1.5 B1dgSF:2,510 Ac:4 . 63 YB:1942 Ph: # 16 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Hong Josaphat & Assumpta Parcel # :142305 9062 08 Site :15409 SE 128Th St Renton 98059 Sale Date :05/18/1990 Mail :15409 SE 128Th St Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price :$199,000 Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$205,000 Lgl :STR 142305 TAXLOT 62 NE 1/4 OF NE Q:NW S:14 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:1/1 / Stories:1 BldgSF:2, 160 Ac:2.30 YB:1964 Ph: # 17 * MetroScan / King * Owner :King County Parcel # :142305 9063 07 Site :*No Site Address* Sale Date :04/30/1993 Mail :500 K C Admin Bldg Seattle Wa 98104 Sale Price :$150, 000 Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$135,000 Lgl :STR 142305 TAXLOT 63 E 518.01 FT Q:NW S:14 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac:4.70 YB: Ph: # 18 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Leifer Irvin T Parcel # :142305 9064 06 Site :15325 SE 128Th St Renton 98059 Sale Date . Mail :15223 SE 128Th St Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price . Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$205,000 Lgl :STR 142305 TAXLOT 64 E 866.01 FT Q:NW S:14 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ /1 Stories:1 B1dgSF:1,850 Ac:2.69 YB:1945 Ph:425-228-3988 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. # 19 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Smith Kenneth Paul Sr Parcel # :142305 9069 01 Site :15402 SE 132Nd St Renton 98059 Sale Date :08/28/1985 Mail :15402 SE 132Nd St Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price :$29,500 Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$220, 000 Lgl :STR 142305 TAXLOT 69 LOT 1 OF KC Q:NW S:14 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 /1 Stories:1 B1dgSF:1, 840 Ac:1.05 YB:1987 Ph:425-226-4899 # 20 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Leifer Randall D/Rosemary M Parcel # :142305 9070 08 Site :15311 SE 128Th St Renton 98059 Sale Date :03/08/1991 Mail :5127 S Fountain St Seattle Wa 98178 Sale Price . Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$269, 000 Lgl :STR 142305 TAXLOT 70 W 150 FT OF E Q:NW S:14 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:5 Bth F3H:1/1 /1 Stories:2 BldgSF:2,590 Ac:2.10 YB:1992 Ph: # 21 * MetroScan / King * Owner :King County Parcel # :142305 9071 07 Site :*No Site Address* Sale Date :01/18/1994 Mail :500 4Th Ave Seattle Wa 98104 Sale Price :$376,730 Full Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$135, 000 Lgl :STR 142305 TAXLOT 71 S 1/2 OF N Q:NW S:14 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac:4. 67 YB: Ph:206-296-0100 # 22 * MetroScan / King * Owner :King County Parcel # :142305 9072 06 Site :*No Site Address* Sale Date :01/18/1994 Mail :500 4Th Ave Seattle Wa 98104 Sale Price :$376,730 Full Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$135, 000 Lgl :STR 142305 TAXLOT 72 N 1/4 OF POR Q:NW S:14 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac:4.67 YB: Ph:206-296-0100 # 23 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Mason William W Parcel # :142305 9073 05 Site :13111 156Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Sale Date . Mail :13111 156Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price . Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$151, 000 Lgl :STR 142305 TAXLOT 73 N 78.765 FT Q:NW S:14 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 / Stories:1 B1dgSF:1,320 Ac: .22 YB:1966 Ph:425-227-4241 # 24 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Kelloniemi Marilyn L Parcel # :142305 9079 09 Site :15416 SE 132Nd St Renton 98059 Sale Date :10/30/1984 Mail :23629 7Th Ave W Bothell Wa 98021 Sale Price :$1, 499 Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$157, 000 Lgl :STR 142305 TAXLOT 79 POR OF NE 1/4 Q:NW S:14 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:2/ /1 Stories:1 B1dgSF:1,520 Ac: .37 YB:1967 Ph: # 25 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Fire District 25 Parcel # :142305 9095 09 Site :12923 156Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Sale Date . Mail :1055 S Grady Way Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price . Use :172 Pub,Governmental Service Asd.V :$503, 854 Lgl :STR 142305 TAXLOT 95 E 420.01 FT Q:NW S:14 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 B1dgSF:7,732 Ac:1.35 YB: 1974 Ph: # 26 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Puget Sound Energy/Elec Parcel # :142305 9106 06 Site :*No Site Address* Sale Date . Mail :PO Box 90868 Bellevue Wa 98009 Sale Price . Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V . Lgl :STR 142305 TAXLOT 106 N 250 FT OF Q:NW S:14 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac: .79 YB: Ph: # 27 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Godsoe Carl T & Kathleen R Parcel # :142305 9114 06 Site :15418 SE 132Nd St Renton 98059 Sale Date :11/20/1984 Mail : 9201 Blackberry St #11 Anchorage Ak 99515 Sale Price . Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$291, 000 Lgl :STR 142305 TAXLOT 114 LOT 2 LESS S Q:NW S:14 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:2/1 / Stories:2 BldgSF:4, 670 Ac:1.01 YB:1988 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. # 28 * MetroScan / King - * Owner :Crosslin Lon A Parcel # :142305 9115 05 Site :15430 SE 132Nd St Renton 98059 Sale Date :04/28/1987 Mail :15430 SE 132Nd St Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price :$28,500 Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$183,000 Lgl :STR 142305 TAXLOT 115 LOT 3 LESS W Q:NW S:14 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:2/ /1 Stories:1 BldgSF:3,280 Ac: .98 YB:1955 Ph:425-204-1660 # 29 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Tacher Michael G & Shaunna J Parcel # :142305 9116 04 Site :15514 SE 132Nd St Renton 98059 Sale Date :11/20/1984 Mail :15514 SE 132Nd St Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price . Use :008 Res,Mobile Home Asd.V :$120, 000 Lgl :STR 142305 TAXLOT 116 PP ACT Q:NW S:14 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac:1.08 YB: Ph:425-226-9460 # 30 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Not Available From County Parcel # : 935330 0690 03 Site :12452 155Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Sale Date :12/10/1998 Mail :12452 155Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price . Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$109,200 Lgl :BLK 3 LOT 7 WHITE FENCE RANCH Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:1,370 Ac: .25 YB:1961 Ph: # 31 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Goonan Martin J Parcel # : 935330 0700 01 Site : 12610 155Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Sale Date :06/08/2000 Mail :12610 155Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price . Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$141, 000 Lgl :BLK 3 LOT 8 WHITE FENCE RANCH Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:1,270 Ac: .25 YB:1961 Ph: # 32 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Bilodeau Marcellena M Parcel # : 935330 0710 09 Site :12618 155Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Sale Date :05/13/1994 Mail :12618 155Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price : Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$146,000 Lgl :BLK 3 LOT 9 WHITE FENCE RANCH Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:1,270 Ac: .25 YB:1962 Ph: # 33 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Herger Ron A Jr Parcel # : 935330 0720 07 Site :12626 155Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Sale Date :07/31/2000 Mail :12626 155Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price :$122,000 Full Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$139, 000 Lgl :BLK 3 LOT 10 WHITE FENCE RANCH Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ /1 Stories:1 B1dgSF:1,210 Ac: .25 YB:1961 Ph: # 34 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Maggard Jolene Parcel # : 935330 0730 05 Site :*No Site Address* Sale Date :09/25/1997 Mail :16023 SE 135Th St Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price :$10, 000 Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$30, 000 Lgl :BLK 3 LOT 11 WHITE FENCE RANCH Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .25 YB: Ph: # 35 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Shines Dolores S Parcel # :935330 0740 03 Site :12638 155Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Sale Date :06/27/2000 Mail : 12638 155Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price :$179,000 Full Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$139, 000 Lgl :BLK 3 LOT 12 WHITE FENCE RANCH Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:1,350 Ac: .25 YB:1962 Ph: # 36 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Knab Harold F Jr Parcel # :935330 0750 00 Site :12646 155Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Sale Date :12/28/1999 Mail :12646 155Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price . Use :008 Res,Mobile Home Asd.V :$89, 169 Lgl :BLK 3 LOT 13 WHITE FENCE RANCH Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .25 YB: Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. # 37 * MetroScan / King - * Owner :Cummings William R/Ida M Parcel # :935330 0760 08 Site :12652 155Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Sale Date :04/20/1998 Mail :12652 155Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$183,000 Lgl :BLK 3 LOT 14 WHITE FENCE RANCH Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:2/ /1 Stories:1 BldgSF:2,250 Ac: .25 YB:1969 Ph: # 38 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Sims Robert N Parcel # :935330 0770 06 Site :*No Site Address* Sale Date :01/10/1996 Mail :12815 SE 218Th P1 Kent Wa 98031 Sale Price Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$25,000 Lgl :BLK 3 LOT 15 WHITE FENCE RANCH Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .25 YB: Ph: # 39 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Nelson Emil/Rosemary A Parcel # :935330 0780 04 Site :15414 SE 128Th St Renton 98059 Sale Date :01/27/1997 Mail :7219 S 128Th St Seattle Wa 98178 Sale Price Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$140, 000 Lgl :BLK 3 LOT 16 WHITE FENCE RANCH Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ /1 Stories:1 BldgSF:1,250 Ac: .25 YB:1961 Ph:206-772-1752 # 40 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Sawyer Ernest C/Mary Jane Parcel # : 935330 0790 02 Site :12657 155Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Sale Date :04/19/1999 Mail :12657 155Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$146, 000 Lgl :BLK 3 LOT 17 WHITE FENCE RANCH Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:1,560 Ac: .25 YB:1961 Ph:425-271-2901 # 41 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Van Ditto Scott A/Danette C Parcel # :935330 0800 00 Site :12651 155Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Sale Date :07/09/1992 Mail :12651 155Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$144, 000 Lgl :BLK 3 LOT 18 WHITE FENCE RANCH Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:1/ /1 Stories:1 BldgSF:1,500 Ac: .25 YB:1961 Ph: # 42 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Christianson Kenneth & Lind Parcel # :935330 0810 08 Site :12643 155Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Sale Date Mail :12643 155Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$146, 000 Lgl :BLK 3 LOT 19 WHITE FENCE RANCH Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:1/ /1 Stories:1 BldgSF:1,530 Ac: .25 YB:1962 Ph: # 43 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Shane Andrea C Parcel # : 935330 0820 06 Site :12635 155Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Sale Date :10/03/1997 Mail :12635 155Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price :$138,500 Full Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$139, 000 Lgl :BLK 3 LOT 20 WHITE FENCE RANCH Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:1,250 Ac: .25 YB:1961 Ph:425-430-8711 # 44 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Lee Joshua C;Brummett Carrie M Parcel # :935330 0830 04 Site :12627 155Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Sale Date :03/31/1994 Mail :12627 155Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price :$120,500 Full Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$138, 000 Lgl :BLK 3 LOT 21 WHITE FENCE RANCH Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 B1dgSF:1,200 Ac: .25 YB:1962 Ph: # 45 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Segaran Chandra/Randi C Parcel # :935330 0840 02 Site :12619 155Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Sale Date :05/22/1992 Mail :12619 155Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price :$100, 000 Full Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$138, 000 Lgl :BLK 3 LOT 22 WHITE FENCE RANCH Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:1/ /1 Stories:1 BldgSF:1,200 Ac: .25 YB:1962 Ph:425-271-8442 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. # 46 • * MetroScan / King dwner :Deshaw Ruth E Parcel # :935330 0850 09 Site :12611 155Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Sale Date . Mail :12611 155Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price . Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$145,000 Lgl :BLK 3 LOT 23 WHITE FENCE RANCH Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:1, 600 Ac: .25 YB:1963 Ph:425-226-3120 # 47 * , : MetroScan / King Owner :Deshaw Ruth E Parcel # :935330 0860 07 Site :*No Site Address* Sale Date :05/31/2000 Mail :12611 155Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price :$20, 000 Full Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$30, 000 Lgl :BLK 3 LOT 24 WHITE FENCE RANCH Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .25 YB: Ph: • The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 5160® J W MORRISON INC CENTEX HOMES RIBERA-BALKO ENTERPRISES PO Box 407 2320 130Th Ave NE#200 16400 Southcenter Pkwy#30 Kenmore, WA 98028 Bellevue, WA 98005 Seattle, WA 981.88 112305 9004 112305 9011 112305 9015 Terry L Olding Mullins Family Trust The Mullins Family Trust The 12614 148Th Ave SE 18631 120Th Ave SE 18631 120Th Ave SE Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98058 Renton, WA 98058 112305 9017 112305 9018 112305 9020 Dean J& Carolyn L Mullenberg Dean J& Carolyn L Mullenberg Charles Lackey 5816 NE 4Th St 12622 148Th Ave SE 5902 NE 4Th St Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 112305 9021 112305 9023 112305 9030 NG PROPERTIES LLC Mark C &Lynnette M Rogers FINER HOMES INC 6234 139Th P1 SE 15240 SE 132Nd St 1215 120Th Ave NE#201 Bellevue, WA 98006 Renton, WA 98059 Bellevue, WA 98005 112305 9093 142305 9003 142305 9004 Baljinder&Rashpal Buttar FINER HOMES INC RIBERA-BALKO ENTERPRISES 5766 146Th Ave NE 1215 120Th Ave NE#201 16400 Southcenter Pkwy#30 Bellevue, WA 98007 Bellevue, WA 98005 Seattle, WA 98188 142305 9016 142305 9017 142305 9021 Josaphat&Assumpta Hong KING COUNTY Irvin Leifer 15409 SE 128Th St 500 K C Admin Bldg 15223 SE 128Th St Renton, WA 98059 Seattle, WA 98104 Renton, WA 98059 142305 9062 142305 9063 142305 9064 Kenneth Paul Smith Sr. Randall D &Rosemary M Leifer KING COUNTY 15402 SE 132Nd St 5127 S Fountain St 500 4Th Ave Renton, WA 98059 Seattle, WA 98178 Seattle, WA 98104 142305 9069 142305 9070 142305 9071 KING COUNTY William W Mason Marilyn L Kelloniemi 500 4Th Ave 13111 156Th Ave SE 23629 7Th Ave W Seattle, WA 98104 Renton, WA 98059 Bothell, WA 98021 142305 9072 142305 9073 142305 9079 FIRE DISTRICT 25 Sound Energy & Elec Puget Carl T& Kathleen R Godsoe 1055 S Grady Way PO Box 90868 9201 Blackberry St#11 Renton, WA 98055 Bellevue, WA 98009 Anchorage,AK 99515 142305 9095 142305 9106 142305 9114 Lon A Crosslin Michael G& Shaunna J Tacher Walter L Bonson 15430 SE 132Nd St 15514 SE 132Nd St 12452 155Th Ave SE Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 142305 9115 142305 9116 935330 0690 C//i AVFIRV® Arldracc I ahPIS I menr cif n® Smooth Feed SheetsTM - Use template for 5160® Martin J Goonan Marcellena M Bilodeau Ron A Herger Jr. 12610 155Th Ave SE 12618 155Th Ave SE 12626 155Th Ave SE Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 935330 0700 935330 0710 935330 0720. Jolene Maggard Dolores S Shines Harold F Knab Jr. 16023 SE 135Th St 12638 155Th Ave SE 12646 155Th Ave SE Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 935330 0730 935330 0740 935330 0750 William R&Ida M Cummings Robert N Sims Emil &Rosemary A Nelson 12652 155Th Ave SE 12815 SE 218Th P1 7219 S 128Th St Renton, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98031 Seattle, WA 98178 935330 0760 935330 0770 935330 0780 Ernest C &Mary Jane Sawyer Scott A&Danette C Van Ditto Kenneth& Lind Christianson 12657 155Th Ave SE 12651 155Th Ave SE 12643 155Th Ave SE Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 935330 0790 935330 0800 935330 0810 Andrea C Shane Joshua C Lee Chandra& Randi C Segaran 12635 155Th Ave SE 12627 155Th Ave SE 12619 155Th Ave SE Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 935330 0820 935330 0830 935330 0840 Ruth E Deshaw Ruth E Deshaw 12611 155Th Ave SE 12611 155Th Ave SE Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 935330 0850 935330 0860 • Ili AVERY® Address Labels Laser 51 An® G,�rtY �� "` Proposed Mitigation Measures: • +®+ 1. The applicant shall Install a silt fence along the tlownslope perimeter of the area that Is to be disturbed. The silt fence shall be in place before clearing and grading is Initialed,and shall be constructed In conformance with the • vP specifications presented In Section D.4.3.1 of the King County Surface Water Design Manual. This will be required • - -eiv v0 during the construction of both off-site and on-site Improvements was well as building construction. 2. 'Shallow drainage swales shall be constructed to Intercept surface water flow and route the flow away from the • NOTICE OF APPLICATION construction area to a stabilized discharge point. Vegetation growth shall be established In the ditch by seeding or AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON— placing sod. Depending on site grades,It may be necessary to line the ditch with rock to protect the ditch from erosion and to reduce flow rates.The design and construction of drainage swales shall conform to the specifications SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS—M) presented in Section 4.4.1 of the 1990 SWDM. Temporary pipe systems can also be used to convey stormwaler across the site. This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site Improvements as well as building construction. I 3. The the prosite ject contract duringtheorcons shaillm perform ction of dailyboth reviewnit-site andand on-sit mainteenanceImprovements 0f all erosionaswe and lles sedimbuildingentationconstmction.control measures DATE: November 17,2000 4. Weekly reports an the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-00-150,PP,ECF wrevision tsop emaintenance e schedules ioorn inostf altlhaeti ocni vshall bpero svuemeintttesd ob tthhee pprloajte ct Engineer loonf record he toiIn tshtea llpautibolnic,APPLICATION NAME: AMBERWOOD PRELIMINARY PLAT maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities shall be required prior to recording of the plaL • PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant has proposed subdividing a 199,505 sq.It.(4.58 A)property,by 5. The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee at the rate of$75.00 per each new average means of the Preliminary Plat process,Into 19 lots suitable for detached,single-family residences. An existing house weekday trip attributable to the project,estimated to be 9.55 average weekday trips per new residence.The and out-buildings would be removed.Access would be from NE 4 Street to the north,via Rosario Avenue NE,end en Transportation Mitigation Fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. extension of NE 3t0 Court to the west. Environmental review is required and a public hearing before the city of Renton Hearing Examiner. 6. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of 5488.00 per each new single family residential lot created by the proposed plat.The fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. PROJECT LOCATION: 6001 NE 4w Street 7. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee at the rate of 5530.76 per each new single family OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS,M):As the Lead Agency,the City of residential lot.The fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued.Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Ms.Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner,Development a single comment period.There will be no comment period following the Issuance of the Threshold Determination of Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on December 1,2000.This matter Is also Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M).A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. scheduled for a public hearing on January 16,2001,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Seventh Floor,Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton.If you are Interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: November 13,2000 Division,(425)430-7282,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled.If comments cannot be submitted In writing by the date Indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: November 17,2000 before the Hearing Examiner.If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,please contact the project manager.Anyone who submits written comments will Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Preliminary Plat Approval automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. Other Permits which may be required: Construction permits,grading license,building permits CONTACT PERSON: ELIZABETH HIGGINS-(425)430.7382 Requested Studies: Geotechnical Engineering Report,Traffic Impact Study,Storm Drainage ' Report,wetland reconnaissance (PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION • -- Location where application may r •*.. x-c a _c a---- y. . .- u• be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, i(, , . . I, . Sixth Floor,Renton City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 "•--m---•0— --m—- ®' - . ; T . PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing scheduled for January 16,2001,before the Renton Hearing •+...,..i• I i, 3 a i 4, 0• Examiner in Renton Council Chambers.Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on the 7th '"°I r " . . • . . . floor of the Renton City Hall located at 1055 Grady Way South. ?e _ �: o, ® ® ° µLi 4TA o ,® _ ppp��� 7 • 1 dr, ®®0.E:� I.... 97Y CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: �' �� ^� r/�/j' +.. ... �• Land Use: single family residential • , ..ny r ;� �/ / 1 u i L . r"e Zoning: Residential 5(five dwelling units per net acre) .; ! m, W..::y sue_ �OjTB{ Environmental Documents that -, O a " a t Evaluate the Proposed Project: Geotechnical Engineering Report,Traffic Impact Study,Storm Drainage Report, i 9 r i�=l wetland reconnaissance ..fQ11. 2 ��� _ O ,..e _ . 0.ur U, • Development Regulations al .t Z a Used For Project Mitigation: Renton Municipal Code,State Environmental Policy Act,1998 King County J r - w•.r3 r' Surface Water Design Manual requirements Z f 11 L�®AH t CRksT•: Es�K�Esre fir. NOTICE OF APPLICATION NOTICE OF APPLICATION ' • "- CERTIFICATION I, /4,aa-e. a,__5,' ,,J ,, hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on . /./W. /7` 2 vU • Signed: t!�i ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public,in and for the State of • Washington residing i(oA- . , on the 30 (t,day o O 0, 2.e2p_o__. -----i—h (Lily ��? (�c -,g, I� L9�GFdEFF 3. OTARY PUBLIC , ` STATE OF WASHING MARILYN KAMCHEFF WASHINGTON MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 COMMISSION EXPIRES ,31.J�dE� 29, 2003 • .,•:'•••••75." .••• oRi6--711/4141--- .•.................,..................,...........,....:•................-••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ••••• DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DiVISION ....„....................................................................................................................................................... ...„..................................LAND.... PERMIT...... USE : .:.• •• „:,. •„.• IIIIIIIIIIPOPPPrOqM* POYYMNIPPINg POARINKOROOP40011NP000ATg$geRmmENINF ,iv.-#::#:,,,$1.Ti,v1:00,....1-.*0..0-..,:ooi,.ApAilgoo!.,#*.ofovoo*A-##otii.::00::.#0diIiotiAr • .• • PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: • NAME: David & Nancy Johnson Amberwood • , PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: 6001 NE 4th Street 6001 NE 4th Street • CITY: Renton WA ZIP: 98059 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): Tax Parcel # 1423059020 TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND USE(S): - - • • % : • , - . APPLiCANT (if other than owner) • PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: Steven Beck 19-detached single family residen.;-. tial COMPANY (if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: • Amberwood, L.L.C. Residential rural ADDRESS: 19129 SE 145th Street PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): N/A CITY; • CITY: •Renton WA 98059 ZIP: EXISTING ZONING: R-5 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 253-770-8100 PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): . N/A SITE,AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): NAME: Lafe Hermansen „ 4 . 58 acres or 199,505. 6 sq. ft. COMPANY (if applicable): • PROJECT VALUE: com6-02,401--150 Cos-rs 45-00,006 (A-tve,)() Core Design, Inc. .PCI,L MA/iv-Ter V A-04e: 35j ODD CkePe#) ADDRESSI 4205 148th Avenue NE, #200 - . IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? • NIO CITY: Bellevue WA 9i607 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY , SENSITIVE AREA? TELEPHONE NUMBER and E-MAIL ADDRESS: Ni° • 425-885-7877 LBH@coredesignin7,..com ' y ::: Y::::y:'vii:<:i::::i'i::i::::i:::i::i:<::.:i:::::.::::i.�:�i.•i:::::: ::::::::::'.::.::::iir' >LGL1DE . P71.O1�L.OP.:PROpE ,7Y::; A ach` i, :>;:.;:>:;:>:.::.;:.;'.;'.:.;:.:.;'. .se _.ate:;:sheet:�f....necessar. ;: ::;:: »>:.;>:.>:::: :: :>. Please see attached. <> > >TYP.., . .. P>::I;><;.;'.,,_TI..::..;;, ..;,;:..E.E::.:<> :><»:::.E <': ' > >>> €>i>'> ` :'": > in:: : i` :>O A 10 :::::::>::::<>:<::<:::::::::>::::>::::> ::;;:<:;::>:::: ::::::>::>:::::::>:::::>'>::>::::>:::> :. ::::;:........ YPE.. F PP I� &..PEES....... ... ........................... ..... . . > >`C I ca ion :>:: : :.;::..>:: :.::.:::'.:: :. .:.:...:.....:. .:.: ....... .pp......t....:..:::... . .:..s::..hat.a . ... .: .. .rt. ::ata..f..w..ill:detelrlmine.:.fees. :... — ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: — COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ — REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ — SPECIAL PERMIT $ _ SHORT PLAT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _X PRELIMINARY PLAT $ — SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ — FINAL PLAT $ _ GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ _ VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY _ WAIVER $ FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT $ ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ BINDING SITE PLAN $ _ SHORELINE REVIEWS: - _ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ — CONDITIONAL USE $ _ VARIANCE $ _ EXEMPTION $No Charge — ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ REVISION $ ::«;': .— N.:!:: ": : :': ::; ;:AF I,P.AUII:T OF::.OWNERSHIP:;:: .:. :>':>:>>:>< ° >`°> : < . I, (Print'Name)(.4 G Lzyile.O, , declare that I am (please check one)X the owner of the property involved in this application,_the authorized representative to act for the property owner (please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are 4rL .,e, ects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. „ •• DN F••••• , 44.63-.0 ` �� J .•4 -.o�,•,0B/ ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and l i _.nTARy m 1 for the State of LI)1S esiding at PiE�2CE (Name of /Representative) i/ •o 0 i £OL , on the IDTHday of oCTDBa 7-------- , �// PUBUoN ▪:ems2oc�.(Signaturer/Representative) iii, • I.•• /� -'y� 11 •.. .••• - �"o�a�uY1 e�l 1! . ��\\OF WAS= (Signature of Notary Public) s'::sec o to e c m etedii.ips' Cit" Staf: `:>::::::<>'ii :< <>' <><' :.::.>:;:::;:<::: ;::. i : `ifj "> umti o:o : ioi <. ... . .. .....:..A....AAD......BSP:.:..CAP .alii.G.Ari ..:... P L:LA :: ::cay.::::::�.N:::.::::e::::. .tfi,�,.<�C�._C ::.:::. ::::..::::: . :::::.:.::..:.::..: ..::;:::..:::.::..U. .A .. Cu;;p►.:.;:.:C�.;:H>:. : :::... :.::M.H::::.F.PU.4...:.(=: .P.. R.....R. .M.p...... A.Q. SA.HSHP...L Ars<:SNRL:H>:: SP :SM:<::>::SM5.. T.f'. V:a.. iNt: :::::>::><:»>::«<:>::«:::»::>>:»::::>:<::>`TOTAL:FEES' '$0C15-i:VS............................TOTAL POSTAGE:>PROVIDED>'$ _ >><< :<>:`::: :. ,„;.°;; >::::>;::. MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 03/00 N OF PigNTON CEWWED. JAN 3 0 2001 PROJECT NARRATIVE BUILDING DIVISION Amberwood is located at 6001 NE 4th Street in Renton, Washington. The site will have two access points one from NE 4th Street located in the northeastern portion of the site and a second access point will occur with a connection to the Maplewood Estates development to the West of the site. The zoning for the property is R-5 and the site currently has one single-family residence along with its associated out buildings. The existing vegetation on the site consists of a combination of coniferous trees, deciduous trees, and a variety of shrubs and plants associated with the landscaping of a single-family residence. The property to the West and the South of the site is the Maplewood Estates development, which is currently under construction. To the east of the site is a single-family residence currently used as a rental property. The north side of the site is bordered by NE 4m Street. The site is generally flat and slopes gently to the southwest corner at approximately 5%. According to the Geotechnical Report by Terra Associates, Inc., written September 15, 2000, the site is entirely underlain by Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam, (0 to 6 percent) which is considered a moderately well drained soil. Other than the over grown vegetation, no other special features such as wetland areas or steep slopes exist on the site. This application proposes a 18 lot preliminary plat on the 4.63-acre site under the existing requirements for an R-5 zone. The average lot size will be 7,849 S.F. and the proposed density is 4.78 DU/AC. The homes are anticipated to be in the middle income price range. The proposal will require the removal of one single- family residence and its associated out buildings. Construction of the site will result in 90-95% of the site being developed and will require the removal of most of the existing vegetation. The purpose of the grading and clearing is to construct the proposed public streets to city standards and to provide building pads and utility locations for the single-family residences. The grading is intended to be balanced on-site, with all cut and fill material originating from within the site. The development will provide the appropriate on-site stormwater management facilities as indicated on the site plan. Storm water runoff from the site will be routed to a 2-celled detention/wetpond that will be constructed within a storm drainage tract in the Southwest corner of the site. The tract will be deeded to the Homeowners Association, and all maintenance will be the responsibility of the Homeowners Association. All storm drainage control facilities will be designed according to the 1998 King County Surface Water. Design Manual. The pond outfall will be connected to the Maplewood Estates storm drainage system. The lots will be served by interior access roads as well as access easements, all of which will be designed and built to the City of Renton standards. We are proposing to reduce the,right-of-way width for the internal access roads to 42 feet. Per City of Renton Development Regulations Section 4-6-060 R.3, Reduced Right-of-Way Dedication, this reduction allows the creation of additional lots within the shape and size constraints of the site. Landscaping for the individual lots will be installed by the homebuyer and will consist of both informal and formal plantings. Access to the internal road will-be from NE 4th Street and the Maplewood subdivision. All design and construction for the improvements both on and off site, will be to the City of Renton standards. The estimated construction cost for the improved lots is $500,000, with fair market value at approximately $1,235,000. Only the public street right-of-way is intended to be dedicated to the City of Renton. • oP lcs►rSA� ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIS�TY o�T_ a-;'�_-;1''''''`° INTRODUCTION Ir NOV 1 Purpose of Checklist: NE3Eh,L. The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental imp statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on t quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and t agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your propos Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of yc proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the me precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most case you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the ne to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer or if a question does not apply to your proposal, wr "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessE delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landm. designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies • assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your propo or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain y answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be signific adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: (A nonproject proposal includes plans, policies . programs where actions are different or broader than a single site-specific proposal) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does apply". IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the word "project", "applicant", and "prope site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer", and "affected geographic area," respectively. IF YOU NEED ASSISTANCE IN COMPLETING THE CHECKLIST OR HAVE ANY QUESTI REGARDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS, PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFICE COORDINATION AT 453-2971, OR VISIT OUR OFFICE ON THE SECOND FLOOR, CITY H4 11511 MAIN STREET, BELLEVUE. 00059vSE.PA01.doc; 10131/00; Page: 1 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Amberwood Preliminary Plat 2. Name of applicant: Steven Beck 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant: Contact Person: Steven Beck Lafe B. Hermansen Amberwood L.L.C. do Core Design, Inc. 19129 S.E. 145th Street 4205 - 148th Ave. N.E., Suite 200 Renton, WA 98059 Bellevue, WA 98007 (253) 770-8100 (425) 885-7877 4. Date checklist prepared: October 23,2000 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton Department of Planning, Building, Public Works 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction is proposed to start in Spring 2002 subject to the approval process. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Not at this time. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Geotechnical Report by Terra Associates, Inc. (September 15, 2000) 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None to our knowledge. 000)59vSE.PA01.doe; 10/31100: Page: 2 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Construction Plan Approval Final Plat Approval Building Permits Grading Permits Other Customary Permits 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) This application proposes a 19 lot preliminary plat on a 4.2-acre site under the existing requirements for an R-5 zone. The homes are anticipated to be in the middle income price range. Construction of the site will result in ±90% of the property being developed. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project address is 6001 NE 4th Street and is located in the NW 14, Section 14, Township 23N, Range 5E. The site is just to the west of the intersection of 156th Avenue SE and NE 4th Street, located on the south side of NE 4m Street. A legal description and vicinity map is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 00059t S ;PAO I.doc; 10 31 00: Page: EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth • a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous other The site is generally flat, sloping to the southwest corner at approximately 5%. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The steepest slope is approximately 15% in the Southwest corner of the property. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. According to the soil survey by Terra Associates, September 2000, the site is almost entirely underlain by Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam, 0 to 6 percent slope: d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None to our knowledge. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The purpose of the grading is to construct the proposed public streets to City standards and to provide building pads and utility locations for single family residences. The grading is intended to be balanced onsite, with all cut and fill material originating from within the site, with the total of±7,500 cubic yards. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Erosion could occur as a result of denuded soil during and immediately following storm events. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 49% will be covered by impervious surface. 00059vSEPAci.doc; I0 31 00: Page:4 h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: A temporary erosion and sedimentation control (TESCP) plan will be prepared and implemented prior to commencement of construction activities. During construction erosion control measures may include any of the following: siltation fence, temporary siltation ponds and other measures which may be used in accordance with requirements of the City. At completion of the project, permanent measures will include stormwater runoff detention and water quality facilities as required. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During construction, there will be increased exhaust and dust particle emissions. After construction, the principle source of emissions will be from automobile traffic, lawn equipment, and others typical of a residential neighborhood. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Off-site sources of emissions or odors are those typical of residential neighborhoods that surround this site, such as automobile emissions from traffic on adjacent roadways and fireplace emissions from nearby homes. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Construction impacts will not be significant and can be controlled by several methods: watering or using dust suppressants on areas of exposed soils, washing truck wheels before leaving the site, and maintaining gravel construction entrances. Automobile and fireplace emission standards are regulated by the State of Washington. The site has been included in a "No Burn Zone" by the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency which went into effect on September 1, 1992. No land clearing or residential yard debris fires would be permitted on-site, nor in the surrounding neighborhood in accordance with the regulation. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. There are no water bodies associated with this property. We are aware of wetland and intermittent streams that are associated with the Maplewood Estates project to the west and the south of the subject property. O0O59vSE1'AOi.doc; It 31 00; Page: 5 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) of the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. We are aware of the wetlands that are associated with the Maplewood Estates project to the west and the south of the subject property. The Maplewood Estates project shows one wetland with a 25 foot buffer located approximately 105 feet from the south property line of this project. Our construction is not anticipated to impact the waters contained within Maplewood Estates. We are unaware of any other waters within 200 feet of our project. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Not applicable. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. There will be no surface water withdrawals or diversions. Please refer to the preliminary drainage plan. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No, a public sanitary sewer system will be installed to serve the future homes. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No groundwater will be withdrawn, public water mains will be installed as part of the plat construction. No water will be discharged to groundwater except through the incidental infiltration of stormwater. 000496EPAOI.doc; ii 0/3 l/O1}: 1 age: 6 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage: industrial, containing the following chemicals....; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. The site will be served by sanitary sewers. There will be no waste material discharged to the ground from the development. Post-development stormwater runoff from roadways and home sites will be collected within drainage facilities which will settle out and/or separate automobile petroleum and other household waste materials to acceptable levels, then tightlined to the stormwater system proposed for Maplewood Estates. Requirements for water quality and runoff rate control will be met. c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) . Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Stormwater runoff will result from roadways and other impervious surfaces and will be collected and routed to the detention facility located on-site, treated for sediment and petroleum removal, then routed through a detention/wet pond. Requirements for water quality, and runoff rate control will be met. Outflow from this system will be connected to the Maplewood Estates storm system. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. This would be very unlikely. The only materials that could enter ground or surface waters would be those associated with automobile discharges and yard and garden preparations. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: A City approved storm drainage system will be designed and implemented in order.to mitigate any adverse impacts from stormwater runoff. The system will include temporary erosion control barriers during site construction, and permanent stormwater collection/treatment facilities soon after beginning site development construction. This permanent system will ensure that prior to the release of stormwater into the downstream storm system, the system will have significantly reduced the potential impacts to ground and surface waters. 00050-6EPA01.doe; 10'3 100: Page: 7 4., Plants a. Check or underline types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other: cottonwood, ash X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other: hemlock shrubs X grass pasture wet soil plants: cattail, creeping buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, horsetail, water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other: other types of vegetation: b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Of the site, all of which is to be developed into lots, roadways and drainage facilities, 90- 95% of the existing vegetation will be removed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. - No threatened or endangered plants are known to exist on the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The yard areas associated with individual ownership will be landscaped by the future residents with both formal and informal plantings. 5. Animals a. Underline any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: woodpecker mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: squirrel fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No threatened or endangered species are known to exist on the site. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The site is part of the Pacific Fly Way. 00059vSEPAO 1.doe; 10/31:`00: Page: 8 d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: The yard areas associated with individual ownership will be landscaped by the future residents with both formal and informal plantings. Existing vegetation will be retained as much as possible. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? • Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity and/or natural gas will be the primary source of energy used to provide heating and cooling to each home. These forms of energy are immediately available to the site. The builder will provide the appropriate heating and cooling systems which are energy efficient and cost effective for the homebuyer. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal: List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The requirements of the Uniform Building Code and the State Energy Code will be incorporated into the construction of the buildings. Energy conserving materials and fixtures are encouraged in all new construction. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. The project will not generate any environmental health hazards. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None to our knowledge. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: There are no on-site environmental health hazards known to exist today nor are there any that will be generated as a direct result of this proposal. 0OO59vSEPA0 i.doe; 1031/00: Page: 9 • . NW 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. r • k • N.E. 4TH ST. SCALE: 1" = 40' • AAm r•w.. q= ,� Io so w �F •' role¢" 1 ,,I I I `� o I I,•'T� q I 4 I .. ,I i I i Y \I auER, APPLICANT r`.` �j LI'•= 4 I • 4N4 I 9n i - I I.i I- I DOM•E4 TT �y). � 37 38 .;a 1 2 ep L-` _ ; l-. "IiI.' LEGAL DESCRIPTION .�R`Ick4r. °o ram' • TI!EAST NAL►OF 11E NODE EADT COMER Or T1E NORIWEBT GILDER Q THE 3 I r__ r__l 1'I I " NORENILDr GILRTR Q DCCTION M.TOUYNT 23 KKK RANGE D EAST.oILLArIRE a'CERt1?OD LLC 6° 1 • I\\: I°Ial MEDIAN.WEC.Y.Gwfl,WmNmr.TGIL leers 6E MEIN A. EM V' I I 45:e E •. I 0 I° u I DtLErf TIE NORM 42 FEET TIEIeFT rAMTCD TO KW COIMT PGI.ROAD fIDl1 T10•8I00 spa ? / I I I I ' I I rwroeee ET v®RECORDED 11JDEi E8C01®Iµ]NO.515250114 t _i= 5---- - L----- '-- a 1,�i ____• /ENGNEER/BURVEYOIR W _�. '� -- _ 1 'I I !KEPT THE WET a0leer MR KO MAP, COTE DESIGN,EN. g G „ F-.: �, • ` -�--�� �:: ,- (OD�wM AK.NL am J00 }e',C WADIINGTW EDOOI ' l , II �,. Virlikaapi-- It•�ww'I . f.O•/TAt.f.DAVIDGl GGgqrt.r O I I 'I IIEVN x VAIJDERIM7OBI-w.•.�p a z yl 7 Z • 1��s i t c p 7� I Ifi I SITE STATISTICS '39 . .-40 . . I`.11 ''t aa' L .' a•'I I I I• ;`�` DE"Aac° e�-s.Es•�E.a. I ? 1•' ..,IL I ', ,v , 1 ' I \ BENCHMARK Teas.Io• tti in 0 �. 6\ ',~ T .``i i >' - ,,t.: I I �II I I`---- TOTAL ME AREA. w7v.D IILY auea \ll•• e �` I mnI Evwre I•R rm o IeNraa wunr aN ruw nrO vwnn (02ii m..r.• •,, ,�M1:•'E . . I� 1` T`�j i 1 •TmTVBY.D See, BNr+"rAt9I.T NC14D rS0 {�.�' I I '� S°J• , ;'V. I 1 a 0:2•!•CRADD DIIIPACE DID.N T4E NT.NC 4TN DT.(DL ODTN NO.OP Loft I' z I I I . d`14?,j 1 I _ DTI.I1eTT1 AVE DL 447 `-1-__.I ` __--c J I I • 1.. I II I ', E.4Den GI.fll•aH ltRp4) AVERAGE LOT DES, TpDO e•. U =i fi 'ti-a_---' I nv '�'/ , III _ __ IT110!•EKREN D14DD!EFFACE DEC.Da THE NT.DL ODTN DT.1 FlGTCD[D DCNDffT.4�DWiC I �.I I�'-•r.y1+~__ _ I�,.`~ _/ e•' .', i�lli CL 0.11.M OR fY10u rliRB) rlJE11TI19 DENIM..D DW/IC '•�C . tll I I•�'r-y.._ 0 I ♦ DBBTrG KKK.. R-D • r I I i 1 / :. 1.1.---` ----- Tl lOfaTKH Or CGROIRD BTRDET AI�ii, N,TJD D/.fBOR OBEEJ tai C1 41 42 vv. I I II is /%61 >I`_` - NOT OURVEMED h mart vl•aDlAri rilE.or.row.a anel —IY laPS 1�6 .+•.. L- - !_-I'- -J 1'• j 1 tt�+ F 2__=� — �' ,1,11rrr i IzIO . —., .3. 61 C •I''• , y �,,..�,...5.... I I A '•I 1 -- 1�---- -- _ .. _. 1 _ I - N Q W y a . 43 • jaml -1 ••-- ?: I m gib"!` I f 7o „. . • Qa I \c W„ S . _ 14 __ -nb� Rr.i4 - 1 I 'r Ig i- , -- 'tiG1tIF,-'{.. <'I,' ..1:(_• h W y ' — 1iI` k Ow � imp - '7 J o N i Iy - I G. \r -=y ! fa — 45 46 =!l°°T a T"' E n u y L i f ;� � • WI I RENTONI1 I'• .- 111 '0=,=1-r�� _' .76 , s A .^ A II •A RraN... Q '!-->=�!'Ii I_y � }^ I- , � • • MD �N BBTD' •W tfr ess + —`\ ATKA 1,'}.j4:j.-_-.. D I g2 xvroRa k '. . .,n•DE.. " Y e ! N q i'F�' 'a' '• __t .r. D 47 48 e,a'ro..'° �� _ l: I :I j, I x 51^ m" "'e -i•;, ,,.J1F a _Es,v'..l•v o o as so 52 s3 1 � I "• L: f _ 1��.'( g E J C:-;.-2 ''.- F`= SHEET OF \ �`" I N VICINITr MAP ® NEIC•HBORHOOD DETAIL MAP N• r•Dooe PROJECT • • • • NW 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. € • • N.E. 4TH ST. t1.5 � � -- SCALE 1R = 40' _� $° __ - --��. .71 ..a lxrzoavn.,u.�..o >n.�m --- ,.rcll'11r -� \ a o tt 8 c I ' I \• \ ` o -'\ 1 ; BENCHMAW o'AHo.HANCE,OWNS, 3g�'=` i 7 I r Y," " e001 NE 4 4 Amer' of Ili.,• I t• I i •I,1,,n HM 38 :t 2�+ '°,. III.,& ; a arm nA a a 4R CITY Cr RtM oN eua2r oN ww MO DA n A�tea°660511... o •'- I - ,•. I-,�-9 1+ __ _-yF,____ 'l '1"II" PI'ItSt.a•[RAee DWACS DISC.N THE Nr./l lTM er.rot DON Ai'�LIOIDCO I �,I m.- I \'.1 l i I I'I 5TJ.ISSN Ave SEnve ee wnl ell�T V.i.I '-��. I I i I .• EG IaI.T OR fDDIN FlTela, I � 2a _'' , i' ll L\+�-, I S I I-I 11.i•; I iBOTM VE OE F]! DIDG.NTHEM eE 061N aT.I _1 ERAaa aVFALE X >+�,., ii,„\.L..... .....,,, FLAWER/IENGINEMBIIRvEYOR !ap�'�Y-- e . ' -'- �---- ----1 nwo METERS) NOS-14664 AVE.NE.SUITE 200-Tm -Li=fir j.IMMI1 - �� I I ( Ib n`I`---- CORE imam.NC. E O �. 3P�_p�:�IE'-_ ':� •••�'• ° -- TVR LaCiTICN=c,IrCARa waewt>GTGN eaom "' T�,TS'd y'im(�a �II raa,a w 1eTT •■ �_ �� i 'l CONTACT.LAKE IER4VYEH•'WM ' AI9��_�:�IT„�—�, ! DAVD G1ttQi-E:plrr d'•I �aI✓o:.- z- > ; � `i� "'igM cw,w I�vN A.,AZ6 NbEN-,,,,r Z� i {T I -�-`� - ---- _�_^ •1!`O�I, rwcmwn,�mH `� `• SO•_�f._� 16• le• so• SITE STATISTICS `J �_iii Q11 {� r --I {\ 1' lid ` to -- t II s n I ; —He a, AREA Dlan.e® Arnao><A.i Agee (111 Nu-i • u I 6 11 ,( e 1.y I i N. ; ATROX Rt LIJI.0 z I I I \. �____ DOW MAW E1 I J 1\•:i g \ '.,I1 �__ ' I \ COW PER' ALY LFIPIJCILT CUM STINTING 1Dro MY. W 1.. III I-MGVATICN /pODGT. \a `\ V 4 1 it .. ' '._�` S.E• 12STH PL. 1010.062111012 Aaoo ar. 0 1 Z -- -t:ip.. I ._ u I `� ; it z I 1 NO SCALE J u jl ' �'-�`_- - --I' ,{10 i: I Nuer..tq. ,,,\, x_ �i I ••••II rill �I. _ -. • R� SDRICRANAL AIL SORE V v t' 14 I J 1 'I IT' 1I 42 1 i ----�II/ �II ' •• - arm° MOIN SS' a-a• LS RATO9 ERSTMD b J .•... I, _ - msLNc mroerTe \ III avAcr we rrATxx e LI: o.a1w- l-I1�'1 I - II 111 "'I _ ROAD \ l°-I II I ?. Mro xnr asrN oeAa O \ = __�� I "1 °`+'•c.�4r Lnsmvc reauvD `�` _J,^,.f ` •&-mow i I:' ` ___ O4tRENANAIF URN AND SWARDRLAVE O "G �l4. II �' ; .1.PFA TO HPONLIF A SmTA$f SVB-BASE !•LOIENT CONCRETE smLrALA• N O m N,2, •y I II I'1 I ,'�1 _ LOIENT LOVLFEIE leRna1L CARO (a-MX IN LRI2EWAIS 1 . _ it jf ...Ai, I f I WICK fiCC �i, d' a � ... ,_ I -- .::f - 1.r. i'y' L ° I AND COMP sn°'oE� 3 RI � } n Imo. T�' SECTION A-A 1. h ., I �"� ti�i.om ,,_►_in- _.5 ( S.E. 128TH ST. HALF-STREET IMPROVEMENTS W �bt 43 44 i \ �� '•\ f�Iv>? ��ao��"—a'�\�\�i� NO SCALE w Phg • -- o SMUT �iBi 1 -2, I r J.I.S. ,� • \ g• _ p.Js�---.,1 �.-__� I 1 ,, -1I as I e non �� _L=' •' aT • x O carmo,i titrAeral I �. 1\, ` •M° -• \ '.L I tO'Lmvr CDVGREIf `I•Haar¢vavT w :.,-, -e -1 11 _�R� �-. ,� KIenCAL CURB s a/TITx OhK1v£7F s[IEII'uK 45 45L.,,�1 R _ �� � \1 sEemiv B-B ? w l®�j a e F Iv 152ND AVE. SE HALF STREET IMPROVEMENTS _)i, IVO SCALE • l�rppp�Tr tc,.Lm AN e81 a'I.'W .•:.r :. -ig_-,,,w - Y .Z u am gym. �M�rNre I : �^,.•. R15 Q•OOLae'An , ' • 2 z o n 47 48 I 49 5u I 52 5.g 1 D o o a - I - , SHEET OF -I I � 1 • 1 1 .i`- ` I PROJECT H 00059. din cl11 i I I I I , ..I I i •\\ I ,'w ill:, L L J V j (A)I :IIW - C A iIi1" �NW.il 6[6t -•i•I I I (N $ „AI A k£. I/I( `I il III. CO 4 - /'I I e I °h 1;11 A A ?` I Iill, Il ;: • p 4, a OI I,I I Ico , c• Rnvt1'G pI r _ w_1 I II -411111111' --- �+ ( I ,.. -, ' I pax GL i �'• + a . o yI / ! I , I ,,„„. e it- O b 9 I _ ...., _ .,W.2— •A CA"r "V' • I (P I>6 m I ?b 7'G b 4>' %A Ii Z . 0, —gyp�Im ti Im + b,� I ,• 1, Iq Im a .` e. motogoirrig i, j1. . . • ri 1 ! Qg ,�_ _ 1 J:i • it pppp pp v C L x1G .k WRS z. y I J !IiP.. I • ------J_-,- �- "�_._ I'•- Yew _ ' "" '•'_ _' -., ° -:-`-'- �;. - a 1 C G x.v[ i / i % i 1 I / 1 1 /, 1 IG� 1I�I i / I / , i I I / I o ; I / 1 r1 . . . to. w • • I PR] gri1g tp q g g I [, E 1 4, 1 1 ;'_>:-1 !ii31_6 1 1 i • • • • , ,.., k _1 ill 2f, 1 1. i E . . . 1 il 1 fii til g 2• • NW 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC. 14, TWP. 28 N, R. 5 E, W.M. DATE NOIENBER 7,2000 ° - TREE CUTTING& CLEARING PLAN /^` ""� • c,M r y DESIGNED LAFE HERNANSLT/ IW LIMA.�NESA 100 - CORE o= DRAWN F.KATONA AMBERWOOD ..r..Wwl.MeV E APPROVED _ NORTHWEST BROKERS,AMBERWOOD LLD: .`�DESIGN "'R°'"�' ""°1'°°' alrax • S v n CRA/G.L KRUEGER 19129 SE 1457H ST. PROJECT MANAGER RENTGV,WA 98059 ENGINEERING• PLANNING• SURVEYING - 44* Issaquah School District No. 411 565.N1N Holl'Str eet.. lssa ti�'`iaa WA 98027 2899 Superintendent Janet N. Barry, Ed. D. December 5, 2000 v � ON G Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner Dec O 8?�� City Of Renton �� o 1055 Grady Way E,vc0 Renton, WA 98055 Re: Amberwood Preliminary Plat Dear Ms. Higgins: In response to your letter dated December 1, 2000, requesting additional information regarding the district's ability to house students from the proposed Amberwood development, the district provides the following information. Apollo Elementary, Maywood Middle School and Liberty High School would serve the Amberwood Development. Apollo Elementary has permanent capacity for 479 K-5 students, and with portables 638 K-5 students. It now has 607 FTE students and is projected at 638 FTE students for the 2001-2002 school year. There are no additional portable sites at this school unless playground and parking spaces are used. Maywood Middle has permanent capacity for 799 FTE students and does not have space to place portables without taking up ballfields or parking spaces. It now has 835 FTE students and is projected to be at 840 FTE students for the 2001-2002 school year. Liberty High School has permanent capacity for 1,112 students and currently does not have portables. It now has 986 FTE students and is projected at 1,019 FTE students for the 2001-2002 school year. We have no plans to increase the capacity of these schools. Internal boundary adjustments may help relive the problem on a short-term basis. An additional elementary school is planned within the City of Newcastle with an anticipated opening date within the next five years. This school will help relieve Apollo's overcrowding. Board of Directors Lesley Austin•Barbara de Michele•Constance L.Fletcher•Mary Scott•Jan Woldseth V Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner December 5, 2000 Page 2 The funding of the Newcastle school requires bond funds and school impact fees. The City of Renton's failure to implement an impact fee ordinance that fully mitigates developments' share of the cost for the infrastructure will negatively impact the district's ability to construct the school. On an interim basis, students generated from new development will attend schools already at capacity. The higher density will negatively impact the schools' ability to provide students with a quality education. Hopefully, this information addresses your questions. Please call my office at (425) 837-7010 if additional information is required. Sincerely, Douglas R. Sn er Assistant Superintendent Cc: Janet Barry, Superintendent Jay Covington, Chief City Administrator . y Ytf, ° � � CityotRenton ti • 14. Development Services Division • 1055 South Grady Way, 6th Floor Renton, WA 98055 Date: December 6, 2000 TO: Lafe Hermansen FROM: Elizabeth Higgins, AICP Senior Planner CORE Design Development Services Div. Development/Planning Phone: (425) 885-7877 Phone: (425) 430-7382 Fax: (425) 885-7963 Fax Phone: (425) 430-7300 ISUBJECT: Amberwood Preliminary Plat I Number of pages including cover sheet: 1 REMARKS: ❑ Original to ❑ Urgent El As ❑ Please ® For your be mailed Requested Comment review Please make a note to correct the lot area calculations when you revise the Preliminary Plat. Lot 11 appears to be correct, most of the others appear to be incorrect. The staff report for the Dec 12th Environmental Review Committee SEPA Determination meeting is being prepared and will be based on the material originally submitted. Conditions may be ap- plied that reflect the site plan revisions mentioned in our faxed memo of 12/5/00. If you have any questions, you may call me at the above number. "ANAL 1 Ahead of the curve C.)e °� Cityof Renton .� ♦ Development Services Division 0. 1055 South Grady Way, 6th Floor NT� Renton, WA 98055 Date: December.5, 2000 TO: Lafe Hermansen FROM: Elizabeth Higgins, AICP Senior Planner CORE Design Development Services Div. Development/Planning Phone: (425) 885-7877 Phone: (425) 430-7382 Fax: (425) 885-7963 . Fax Phone: (425) 430-7300 ISUBJECT: Amberwood Preliminary Plat I Number of pages including cover sheet: 2 REMARKS: ❑ Original to ❑ Urgent ❑ As ❑ Please ® For your be mailed Requested Comment review Please review the following comments (see plan included herewith): • Rosario Ave NE (152nd Ave SE) must include 35' of right-of-way • We are unclear if there is an existing dedicated right-of-way. Please provide documentation from the title company (King County recording no. 5790506) as also requested in letter of 12/5/00. • The 26' access easement will require a hammerhead turnaround, 45' north and south of center line of access easement. • The half cul-de-sac will have to be relocated to serve lots 18 and 19 (no private driveway in right-of way is allowed). • All streets, including private easements that serve three or more lots, must be included in the calculation of street area and deducted from the gross site area for purposes of calculating density. • Please demonstrate that you are not exceeding the maximum density of 5.0 du per net acre. • You will have to request a modification due to "more than four lots not abutting a public street" (lots 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17). Ahead of the curve �'� — -•-T SHOULDER -- II not. •0 6., . to ICIER • r— r---xi-----, s r ��111 g� ', L f'W` • I _ _ 4 s�-� I • I , '" IP I m m • II cn� I I„, I N •1 I u I N I N a`s!YV11 ��- 16E s I S ,3T7 - I •,n I N I m I vet F�DI•w� ti 1 .o. I , i i • G 38 'I A C° m 1 I (j I NI N �; m 1 I 2 °�', L • P15'�-----J z I-' I ��/.�� N 2 SOR 0 •EI W 1 n I to .f• Agat A BF c basep' I I o r-- ---- �7--1 ►> I I, CI,►a'� ` .4., ego I s02 I , 8 . I m i lob* I 1 a I I ' • I IC xl I: 49s• I • `b I a I 5 I . I_ ePbO b0 L-SSA-•u- \� P - - ---- ,36+i 8 -� 1 x • �p 9 01r? 1 t tZ•° l.! 01 • 21' _��mi >•a�o • •i I� I �� W a� 1 -- --- 3 r a v • . I T° m 1 l_ 1.92 �'bo �r �..a i. �`` 21� ) rI I Im I, LALr -�- r.E_.-_.-- 1 r— ,pO•,'�E ,LpA b,s A 1 ItiE l: Q,�/ f ' • �b a, ---a, r— - • ' I KW cV Ks �o -`$ Ott I--- - - `TM _ ,P ` I1� \I j ._X1�X. 6 I I.tkI. 0 ?96. •`hP •p� •aA v6P O� •,`�h�` e`'rEil •1� , I`• r�a l W��4 V 40 �c .� ,+IL I 4, I • I• �e b •�a •,� •,ryA I I %9O W. •`a •I v "' • I Street � 6 0 I , , �I r U �yy / 'I ,2O48F. 1 ®• 0 8 '� �h -y�.•�--- ' ; 1�E• I I,`C � Y 490 E �P I sR A 1b`O4 @� •,ry @ aF.A -- ---- ;��E `I G . .._9I p•� • • • tic•`�O 1Va' I E , l 7 �� can I I • L i..,_.k.°___,__;,0L ----•4i-, 1z, ••tv.---J , 1 v I'• • 1ry0 ��o I� 1 _��N/�0V h 60 •E E 0E E .E •E 1E �E . .,, I V".�_•""-'"�' 1, r.6_..4\ :4 MAW. ..' ttO :. (41144-.. . r- ::77-t:- • "• • 42 .-. ,8O58F. I I �;l▪ e , I • II I10: s % x 0 tel 3. m3` --- --�`-- E®. HOUSE I 7 /1245 •�6 � I S tV�K ��I u„6 4.r • L = = :. 1--0 __Xialitaiiggill l'In •14‘. I CO • ` � • ; I fil .4. 1 816 WZ700 1 sJokir COI ! de,404* I il?ol �'� x�„ I1II At I S • .,.1� ;yE k ► M d IZR▪ ICAR Oj ' AGARA�E 8. `• 1 - i - --III- -^� am ".. ,• NL go• �,1; ` lAti— ;v._--- ---a_ � I —_---yco • \ bo Q. ,44 if' 11111111Mik L94.._ \V .• . .,,1 54w1-11 la - . — : •�ti . � G ts,frvo I I / 492 , I<l4 • � IvtL ------- I • / i I 1.aN 1V (1= u�wil .Pow �,'Is). — —°� p�m v Ew 93a,�F. I, • 1 9 r478 jI `� /I JEr -i --\ - 1.TAA hir • FP ke aRa+wac,�rw�cT `--� � M1p Aid 9,186 8F. le 476 .� 4962,8F. 1 ,�� (f.L.C� 474 . \\.• ' 0, 1 1 i 2.t .A Ili Streit' 160 • .n•ocae „N 88`i6'O6" W ~484.�� .'� R i tr+ I CITY- )F:.RENTON ..iL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tannei,Mayor. • Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator December 1,2000 Mr. Doug Snyder. Assistant Superintendent Issaquah School District 565 NW Holly. Issaquah, WA 98027... . . •_Subject: Amberwood Preliminary Plat LUA00-150,P.P,ECF Dear Mr. Snyder- ,}. .:, Thank you for providing information;regarding:the.Issaquah School District's ability to serve new students who may live:in theabove referenced development, a 19:lot single family subdivision.. • Your response to our enquiry states that the assigned schools, Apollo Elementary and • Maywood Middle School are currently"at capacity:°',,In order'to evaluate the.subject ` development proposal, the City of Renton would appreciate additional information regarding the situation. Our questions are as follows : ;;;:, :;': 1. By what means,would capacity:.in"these schools be increased? 2. If construction of additional capacity is planned,"as per the 2000 Capital Facilities Plan,"when would actual capacity be available?:, ; " 3. If capacity will not be available at these schools Autumn of 2001, will the Issaquah School District provide school service by alternate means and what would these means be'? -, Thank you again for your continued a ssistance. If you have"any questions, please contact me at (425)430-7382. Sincerely Elizabeth Higgins, AICP.: Senior Planner : - - :1055- South Grady Way-Renton,Washington'98055 = CITY C ' RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor • Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator November 22, 2000 Mr. Doug Snyder DEVCITY OF ENTOIVNINC� Assistant Superintendent Issaquah School District Nov 301000 565 NW Holly Issaquah, WA 98027 • RECEIVED Subject: Amberwood Preliminary Plat �o� LUA00-150,PP,ECF • The City of Renton Development Services Division has received an application to subdivide 4.58 acres into 19 lots • for detached,single-family residences. The property is located at 6001 NE 4th Street. • In order to process this application, the Development Services Division needs to know which schools would be attended by children living in residences at the location indicated above. Would you please fill in the appropriate schools on the list below and return this letter to my attention, Development Services Division, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,Washington 98055. • Elementary School: Apollo Elementary Middle School: Maywood Middle School High School: Liberty High School Will the schools you have indicated be able to handle the impact of the additional students estimated to come from the proposed development? Yes No Any Comments: Apollo Elementary and Maywood Middle School's are at capacity. Additional capacity will be required to house additional growth. The construction of additional capacity is- planned as per the 2000 Capital Facilities Plan. The funding for the new capacity will be through school impact fees . and capital bonds. Thank you for providing this important information. If you have any questions regarding this project, please contact me at(425)430-7382. - Sincerely, • Elizabeth.Higgins,AICP Project.Manager • • school/ /kac 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 :.� This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer CITY C ' RENTON ..irl • ' Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator November 17, 2000 RECEIVED �o� vf�(l�rG V 20 Superintendent's Office '00 uo Renton School District #403 OFFICE OF n-t 300 SW 7th Street w SUPERINTENDS,., Renton, WA 98055-2307 Subject: Amberwood Preliminary Plat LUA00-150,PP;ECF The City of Renton Development Services Division has received an application to subdivide 4.58 acres into 19 lots - for detached, single-family residences. The property is located at 6001 NE 4th Street. In order to process this application, the Development Services Division needs to know which Renton schools would be attended by children living in residences at the location indicated above. Would you please fill in the appropriate schools on the list below and return this letter to my attention, Development Services Division, City.of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98055. Elementary School: Middle School: High School: Will the schools you have indicated be able to handle the impact of the,additional students estimated to come from the proposed development? Yes No �..r s ^ r j r .P Any Comments; ��,�.*`.,r�°�` �.�.•..,**;r'�v„rp S',�"'`wa�r b• '4a2-o-,r+ �,N:F3.a .n't m��. ,A ..,•i�'.�'r n a �.wrer,- �.;.;,:"ri. y.,,�°� • Thank you for providing this important information. If you have any questions regarding this project, please contact me at(425)430-7382. .. Sincerely, Elizabeth Higgins, AICP Project Manager school/_/kac 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 •.., This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer '_. : :CITY IF RENTON' ..IIL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor : • :.: . Gregg Zimmer PE:,Ad inis .man m trator December 5,2000 . _ .. Mr.:Lafe,Hermansen • Core Design', Inc.. 4205.=148th Avenue NE,#200 ` _ . Bellevue, WA 98007 •• SUBJECT Amberwood Preliminary Plat ; Project No, LUA-00-150, PP, ECF Dear Mr.Hermansen: The City of Renton Property Services-Department has provided the following comments ' ' on the above referenced plat. Please'direct the"Preliminary Plat'corrections to my attention: 'Final Plat".items will be required following the preliminary plat approval, but : • prior to recording the final lat:,°' Preliminary Plat comments: : :' <rµ Y; ;`. The legal description for the subject plat excepts the east 30 feet for road However,the Assessor's map does not show an exception for said 30 feet Also, the legal description - noted for the subject tax parcel inthe King County Tax Rolls only states"LESS CO. ROAD." Please,have the title company provide a copy of,King County Recording No: 5790506,which is noted in the legal description for road purposes. ' •' Final Plat approval requires the following: •. Note the City of Renton land use action nurriber and land record number, LUA=XX-XXX= FP and LND-10-036X, respectively, op the drawing,preferably in the upper right-hand •. - corner. 'The type size used for the land record number should•be smaller than that used •' •.: :for_the land use action number :-Please note that the-lend'use action number for the final plat will be different from the preliminary plat and is unknown as of this date. ::'° 1, '-,. Show ties to the City of Renton Survey Control Network. The geometry will be checked when the ties are provided. Complete City of Renton monument Cards,with reference points of all new right-of-way :: • - monuments set as part of this,plat. : . - ' Provide plat and lot closure calculations. •. - Include a statement of e ui ment and procedures used, per wAC332-130-100. - ; ;.:;_: . Prnr�ry rnmmpnfe tiny` - - ." . - • '1055 South Grady Way Renton,Washington 98055: : ' • coo This uaoer contains 50%recycled material.20%oost consumer _ - Page 2 of 3 . . • Indicate what has been,or is to be,set at the corners of the proposed lots. ; • '. Note all easements,agreements and covenants of record On the drawing. Note discrepancies between bearings and distances of record and those measured or : Calculated; if any. , Note whether the adjoining properties are platted (give plat name and lot number)or unplatted. The city will provide addresses for the proposed lots after thepreliminary plat is approved: On the final plat submittal; remove all references to trees,utility facilities, topography lines • and other items not directly impacting the subdivision. ,These items are provided only for preliminary plat approval.. Required City.of Renton signatures (for approval of the plat) include the Administrator of Planning/Building/Public Works, the Mayor,:and'the City Clerk An approval block for the City Director is also required, The=appropriate:King County approvals need to be noted on the drawing also: _ `<...,,y.r. .:.i..' , .•.fie , The owners of the subject plat need to sign the final`"plat:document. Include notary blocks as needed. z ' s ':: Include adedication/certification block on the drawing::`. 'i Note that if there are restrictive covenants,or agreements toothers as part of this • subdivision, they can be recorded concurrently:with the plat .The plat drawing and the associated document(s)are to',begivento.the Planner as a package. The plat shall have ;the first recording number.;;The recording number(s)for;the associated document(s)will • - • be referenced on the plat in the.appropriate locations. , If new easements are shown for the benefit:of,future owners of the proposed lots, then : include the following statement;juxtaposed,to thesubject easements:"Area for private (utilities, access, etc.)easement:';Since the new lots created via this plat are under common ownership:at the time of recording,there;can,be no easement until'such time as ownership of one of the lots is conveyed to others,together.with and/or subject to specific • easement rights. Also,add the following Declaration of Covenant language on;the-face-of:thesubject ; ': . drawing,if the previous_paragraph applies: DECLARATION OF COVENANT .,(;;:.:.: :The owners of the land embraced within this plat, in return for the benefit to accrue from this subdivision,by signing-hereon covenants and agrees to • - convey the beneficial interest in the new easement shown.on this plat to any: ' - 'and all future purchasers of the lots,or of any subdivisions.thereof. This • , covenant shall run.with the land as shown on this'plat.,; ._ S :. psery comriments:doc Page 3 of 3 Fee Review Comments: The Fee Review'Sheet for this review of the preliminary plat is provided for your use and information. :. ..: Please.contact me, at(425)430-7382, if you have any questions. ;...Sincerely;'• ;: . 'Elizabeth Higgins,AICP ; Senior Planner • • • • - - PROPERTY --RVICES FEE REVIEW FOR SUBDI'"7ONS No. 2000-o-et, 51 -Y� fir=i APPLICANT:clot—FtJ—)U31-A-►_M ' tJ, lam((At-fps woat� /-..L.c) RECEIVED FROM .(date) JOB ADDRESS:_Q,:nc-DL 4T1-•1• =-- WO# NATUREM OF WORK: LND# 1 c'- 6a•PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF SUBDIVISION BY ONG PLAT, NEED ORE ORMATION: 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION SHORT PLAT,BINDING SITE PLAN,ETC. 0 PID#'s 0 VICINITY MAP O FINAL REVIEW OF SUBDIVISION,THIS REVIEW REPLACES 0 SQUARE FOOTAGE 0 OTHER • PRELIMINARY FEE REVIEW DATED 0 FRONT FOOTAGE p, SUBJECT PROPERTY PARENT PID# I4 F -90Pc X NEW KING CO.TAX ACCT.#(s)are required when . • assigned by King County. It is the intent,of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice,that the fees quoted below may be applicable to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are potential charges that may be due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements(i.e.underground utilities,street improvements,etc.) Triggering mechanisms for the SDC fees will be based on current City ordinances and determined by the applicable Utility Section. Please note that these fees are subject to change without notice. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of Building Permit/Construction Permit application. ❑ The existing house on SP Lot# ,addressed as has not previously paid SDC fees,due to connection to City utilities prior to existance of SDC fee Ord. SP Lot# will be subject to future SDC fees if triggering mechanisms are touched within current City Ordinances. 0 We understand that this subdivision is in the preliminary stage and that we will have the opportunity to review it again before recordation. The following quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees, side sewer permits,r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PARCEL METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NO. NO. ASSESSMENT UNITS OR FEE Latecomer Agreement(pvt)WATER -0- Latecomer Agreement(pvt)WASTEWATER(cE e)0018 4o zpc $44)1 .36 Latecomer Agreement(pvt)OTHER -o - • Special Assessment District/WATER o 11-1 jt= -ic ptc ooc,Z 4E24,5E r Special Assessment District/WASTEWATER - • Joint Use Agreement(METRO) -a- Local Improvement District * -o- Traffic Benefit Zones $75.00 PER TRIP,CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION FUTURE OBLIGATIONS I I -o - SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WATER 0 Estimated #OF UNITS/ SDC FEE 0 Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) 0 Never Pd SQ.FTG. Single family residential$850/unit x 19 WA'i i orTIV 10 181 ' Mobile home dwelling unit$680/unit in park PIROY1t301WD $(Wj=-s ben- Apartment,Condo$510/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial, $0.113/sq.ft.of property(not less than$850.00)x . Boeing,by Special Agreement/Footprint of Bldg plus 15 ft perimeter(2,800 GPM threshold) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WASTEWATER 0 Estimated ❑Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) 0 Never Pd Single family residential$585/unit x . . l.9 `4) 11) 115.00 • Mobile home dwelling unit$468/unit x Apartment,Condo$350/unit not in CD or COR zones x ' Commercial/Industrial$0.078/sq.ft.of property x(not less than$585.00) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SURFACEWATER 0 Estimated ❑Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) 0 Never Pd Single family residential and mobile home dwelling unit$385/unit x IQ a 7)315.00 All other properties$0.129sq ft of new impervious area of property x (not less than$385.00) I PRELIMINARY TOTAL• $ 61 o (37Eanfh_i , 34E/ O0 ) o Signatuf Rev' mg Authority A o0 ❑ *If subject property is within an LID,it is developers responsibility to check with the Finance Dept.for paid/un-paid status. ❑ Square footage figures are taken from the King County Assessor's map and are subject to change. 0 Current City SDC fee charges apply to w ▪ 14o(�. :7a-f sY —}�i �/, c4 c. -�"o luC F E 7 ou 1/1/01 -1 1-f4.-�-1:31 w1 u_ f !- cj- -11 It: L1 Ev/ c31..11 QLJ Q4 o c:/template/feeappl/tgb EFFECTIVE July 16, 1995/Ord.Nos.4506,4507,4508,4525,and 4526 City of OP , Department of Planning/Building/Public o ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Po l lC.-C.- COMMENTS DUE: 12/1/00 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-150,PP,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 11/17/00 APPLICANT: Steven Beck PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth Higgins PROJECT TITLE: Amberwood Preliminary Plat WORK ORDER NO: 78756 LOCATION: 6001 NE 4th Street SITE AREA: 199,505.6 sf(4.58 acres) I BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has proposed subdividing a 199,505 square foot(4.58 A) property, by means of the Preliminary Plat process, into 19 lots syitable for detached, single-family residences. An existing house and out-buildings would be removed. Access would be from NE 4` Street to the north, via Rosario Avenue NE, and an extension of NE 3`"Court to the west. Environmental review is required and a public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water _ Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services t/ Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet lrnLluInaL Lr C-r B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional inform Lion is needed to properly assess this proposal. 0 /Z-r-M Signature of Director or Authori d epresentative Date Routing Re, ' IL, City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL&DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department: Transportation Comments Due: 12/1/00 Application No.: LUA-00-150,PP,ECF Date Circulated:11/17/00 Applicant: Steven Beck Project Manager:Elizabeth Higgins Project Title: Amberwood Preliminary Plat Work Order No: 78756 Location: 6001 NE 4th St. Site Area: 199,506.6 sf(4.58 acres) Building Area(gross): A.Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments No comment. B.Policy-Related Comments No comment. C. Code-Related Comments Transportation improvements will be required which include but are not limited to curb, gutter, sidewalks, street paving and street lights per City of Renton Standards/Codes. The above street improvements are required on all existing streets abutting the plat as well as within the plat. Traffic mitigation fees of$75/trip will be required(see attached calculation fee for this project$13,637.25). 11Z8-00 Signature of Director or Auliorized Representative Date Lua15Op1c • • - O �• itiik:}:Ji:$<Y:::4'ii'i'i<$iiiiii:?:;:?`•}i::ii:i'ii{:vv:{::.+•iT'}ii:}$L:iT:'r. .Rr.:}}:+{p;{•:ti::.%.}•:.;•.}•.v}Y::+•ri•}:?•:4}}':?•:?+9:'n:•}v}}'•:ti+r}'{•}•}T:?•}}'r•:{•:i}"•}}}:ti•T}'tiff•}ifi:i:?{r??^}}i{{+• :4:Y•:?ri:Ti:?:i$`•i?iirir .;..:.Av:vr}•:}C•:n{•:w:•v::.f,..�:rnT:.:r•.:n:.v^::::::n:v:},::,:?}.::::::r•:::::.v:::?•:n•::v.:'•?ia.:?v}}:.::•:....::.p.....:....:::...:::{..;:......: .v.. .+r..•rv.inf!}Y{?:.}:•}}}}}}::i:}•{.{n {r. .ry; .} }� •: •: �'T •}: •.•: .. :'•.. } ,•y f?{::h}'•}:'i:4:•T] ri:}'{:tin:i:{•.v nv:.:{r{:i\.:?:v}.} :v :i)fC::iri:i'i}:r:4v:v:.n4}::{i.}::: Project Name t�Mez—R\macn Re..1 I MI to lavki Project Address 6001 NE t-kytn " � Contact Person VL1L Address 1I act % l`\50'' 9rn4,21C '1W59 Phone Number 2,53--1-7O ` Q21ob Permit Number LOI\ ' Ob ` ( Vy Project Description 11 Lo'r SF Q,le antna3 Y(►�( Land Use Type: Method f Calculation: ❑ Residential ITE Trip Generation Manual Li"` aWTZ°0 ❑ Retail ❑ Traffic Study (Zt u) sr eEscoc ❑ Non-retail ❑ Other q_S7 • Calculation: x Eb�t e_ oNL t Is-nts 1\oosE �l x `t�57 via, to s= I.a,`1+q. Transportation Mitigation Fee: 12°).°�'1�'1• .50 Calculated by: 4. ' lkYtc,IJ Date: 1\ •20 )'i.ciV • - Account Number: I Date of Payment 41111 L7 p +C. cmsRTATION .....:..:.:::.:..:.....::....:...:.. MITIGATIONr E Project Name AIL1 1 \Moog v�\tnnitorkny 19UW Project Address 6001 NE U � � 1 Contact Person SiEVt;Nbag. Address 1€ act E t`-15 ‘4,4 G 5`i Phone Number 770 ` 27IOO G Permit Number LO(� ' DO - (� �� ems` Project Description tq L-t71 Si ?i,A. Mntnv Pi Land Use Type: Method of Calculation: ❑ Residential ITE Trip Generation Manual (-04).` ❑ Retail 0 Traffic Study (Zt u) SF ask —V(r- ❑ Non-retail ❑ Other q_s7 • Calculation: kq ' ` X .5� 5�1.�3 x $'7 _ ' �'� (0 3�7. • a5 Transportation Mitigation Fee: / Calculated by: . l vk IJ Date: 1\ 1'20 )'7A7UD Account Number: Date of Payment - Aisk ~ City of Rom!'Department of Planning/Building/Public !� ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: -Fire, pV.evev\-hrin COMMENTS DUE: 12/1/00 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-150,PP,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 11/17/00 APPLICANT: Steven Beck PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth Higgins • PROJECT TITLE: Amberwood Preliminary Plat WORK ORDER NO: 78756 E LOCATION: 6001 NE 4th Street C EOVIE SITE AREA: 199,505.6 sf(4.58 acres) BUILDING AREA(gross): 77 1111 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has proposed subdividing a 199,505 square foot( prol 9((��t b3 rf�e9@f the Preliminary Plat process, into 19 lots syitable for detached, single-family residences. An existin houF.e and out-buildings woulc be removed. Access would be from NE 4` Street to the north, via Rosario Avenue NE, and-an ext nsion eft# `d �t. Environmental review is required and a public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Exami er. I OF RENTON FIRE DEPARTMENT A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 41a ��,A/D/` .4-Ord c/S /I/d V- V / B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS , / C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS dirk:a CS /44c, 5 We have viewed this application ith particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identifie areas of probable impact or areas where ad itional information is nee. to properly assess this proposal. ad ad O 7 _ Si nat re of Director or Authorized Repr sentative Date Rou in Rev.10/93 , .. 0 40 TY S. O 4. ® , CITY OF RENTON "P FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU N�o MEMORANDUM DATE: November 20, 2000 TO: Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner 2/FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal SUBJECT: Amberwood Preliminary Plat, 6001 NE 4th St. MITIGATION ITEMS; 1. A fire mitigation fee of$488.00 is required for all new single family structures. FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS; 1. A fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single family structures. If the building square footage exceeds 3600 square feet in area, the minimum fire flow increases to 1500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structures. 2. Roadway turnaround for this size plat requires a full 90 foot diameter/no i' cul-de-sac. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. eat. City of Ren..... Department of Planning/Building/Public W_, ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: (.)‘/Lp WLtL ).P,velOprV UAvCOMMENTS DUE: 12/1/00 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-150,PP,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 11/17/00 APPLICANT: Steven Beck PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth Hi gin EC �;17 PROJECT TITLE: Amberwood Preliminary Plat WORK ORDER NO: 78756 LOCATION: 6001 NE 4th StreetECONOMIC D vSITE AREA: 199,505.6 sf 4.58 acres BUILDING AREA ross NEIGHRn F�UMcArr HATEGIG,p1A. r.. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has proposed subdividing a 199,505 square foot(4.58 A) property, y n oLt 'e Preliminary Plat process, into 19 lots s itable for detached, single-family residences. An existing house and out-buildings would 6e removed. Access would be from NE 4t�Street to the north, via Rosario Avenue NE, and an extension of NE 3`d Court to the west. Environmental review is required and a public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS I c E E-1 e,A0-7cco 1 -6-51 P(c rn/12---62--u L. 2\C 7-dP-L. O± uC- 1on1 F dzarn. 7\1 G42o55 ' - /1 Fc a 5TR€ s /1-90D-ProZ-s LoLj t 7 \S No-r G-67in- I.J\—%4-619--- THz% /}c���S C:/fish - t sins f GQ 0c.7 etD . (`l0 07{-4Ce--Po Li c,Y 66 b&3 . srfe--4-yet (�Z/)9 icuJnrc, C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where itional inThrm tion is needed to properly assess this proposal. /a//03 Signa ur Direct or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 1 �� v FOG UNE DOE OF CONCRETE'MD to - ---�- - _ USW FlBER OPTIC I 01. siiii�_ PHA - '--s_ giI 1 0��_ -- EBAR o i F, - ORNER I i 1 9rE� '' - \ ti 3� 1 1I SA � N� RI J i N \\ \ti. I I ° xl I a98 I v ° I % ' I $ I I ---- - p ---- L_Ss�_ = J {p _ 'fli4s ) j 1 x I _ , a 60 ` 60 •� ---� •/?.1/- : 4 13 - s� ��bo bo ��7������� 21'rg 1.. 7*, 1 1 ? \ \rye b'' • 1 i.E � o I • I I`M1•E I I r- • • `o y •ryI 6 I I � \\p `� A •'�_X X 14• I • • .(, • I •` � ; • I; d� ap a p40 c ,4 ` bl •` I h • ,--_• I • �Id I At. (1 `c � • i o p _ „• 0b \I 1 • I `R p 4° •�I 1244 8F r I • •` o \k I � •1 I I ti6 \�1Y 490 . • iiI !_ _J p• 1 I I I •• 1 I 1E tip I s I 1 `-'‘ • �ti I T249 �/ 1,44 3 I I 1 60 ,.E E p .•,. F F S :E I ' .,° I I I • �E T _ _�641, 98 ,L 'A • • ZI i -x'- Rey. _I• --1--__- I�j� $l I �`� 42 § I 1806 6F. I "1„ I M I n / `6 1 1 m� "_ I `0" I , ; 1 • ,z : ejF. , •,off I <ram\. '�____- •!\0 i�•' ,;I HODS I / •� • 1. .:,...c `-�\ v i 2 i --------- q a • xIIII 13 — -1-- _ gE•11 1 L. , AY' •� I ryAF•RkF I I x I ~ V •��0E 1 I \ a II I '. 1 1 cO e� • j �� x I 1808 S p I I I y 6'f1C:CE38 7...1:11, ••'L • I�� '•+� XII ! ' �aF .�, 1'.,I - ' T - p 1 CAR'Otl<'; GARA(jE po �a w I ��•�E•• \ vet---- --+`- , L—_-- I I ` \ p. 44 'p R, \ 60 Ibasa� 1%110.4 ...., \\� � �� n I ap 16 • 1. 4AO ` K00 '111111 i ' \ La's �i5 5- Air: _ I / s I ° \• \'1 J►�+ lY GA 1,I I s I I 1 - -, '�\RAGE �RfpRT //I1 I I ti w �y. ),MO L �A'J✓�L 1N"" fir______" •�y,°° 3 8F. // I I 9341118R - Z r`�`_ nlp'� N U _�,r p1b• \TI II r �rif liv 1 12'' 4 v 1 Jr. / / wil �v� o� '(b J�D - a? ° r� 81 ,-v ✓ma y - -S�1% ��" 'Ica CO ce /W� VYj 6.F. A 1 � � I962�8F. J�5f '///���//� { � o I 476 \474 , p � -t'•-_iwo IIltioti••466S157164•1619•Pr 1.4.16461160iimrti 'moiefoo oo focoi .` ¢ gq-5'F- 4%8—�N 8816'>6" H./r ACPA• IPS 4.L • City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL&DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department:Surface/Wastewater Comments Due: 12/1/00 Application No.: LUA-00-150,PP,ECF Date Circulated:11/17/00 Applicant: Steven.,Beek-r--- "' `" Project Manager:Elizabeth Higgins Project Title`Amberc �ocllrelminary Plat Work Order No: 78756 Location: 6001—I E"4 St. Site Area: 199,506.6 sf(4.58 acres) Building Area(gross): A.Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments No comment. B.Policy-Related Comments No comment. 41 C. Code-Related Comments Surface Water: I kttitAAC- etwi; The drainage plans an temporary erosion/sedimentation plans shall be in accordance with the KCSWDM as ado to the City of Renton. Surface water(SDC) fees of$525/single family lot will be required. Wastewater: The site will be required to extend the sanitary sewer main from the Maplewood Estates Plat to serve J this plat. Sidesewer stubs to each lot in the plat will be required at a cost of$60/each. East Renton ✓ Interceptor sewer charge(SAD) fees will be required. East Renton Interceptor extension latecomer fees will be required: Wastewater(SDC)fees of$760/single family lot will be required. fi //—Z8-00 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Lua15Op1a City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department:Surface/Wastewater Comments Due: 12/1/00 Application No.: LUA-00-150,PP,ECF Date Circulated:11/17/00 Applicant: Steven Beck Project Manager:Elizabeth Higgins Project Title: Amberwood Preliminary Plat Work Order No: 78756 Location: 6001 NE 4th St. Site Area: 199,506.6 sf(4.58 acres) Building Area(gross): A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments No comment. B. Policy-Related Comments No comment. C. Code-Related Comments Surface Water: The drainage plans and temporary erosion/sedimentation plans shall be in accordance with the KCSWDM as adopted by the City of Renton. Surface water(SDC) fees of$525/single family lot will be required. Wastewater: The site will be required to extend the sanitary sewer main from the Maplewood Estates Plat to serve this plat. Sidesewer stubs to each lot in the plat will be required at a cost of$60/each. East Renton Interceptor sewer charge (SAD) fees will be required. East Renton Interceptor extension latecomer fees will be required. Wastewater(SDC) fees of$760/single family lot will be required. 1/-Z8—00 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Lua150p1a lib v/"" City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL&DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Depaitixient: Water Comments Due: 12/1/00 Application No.: LUA-00-150,PP,ECF Date Circulated:11/17/00 Applicant: Steven Beck Project Manager:Elizabeth Higgins Project Title: Amberwood Preliminary Plat Work Order No: 78756 Location: 6001 NE 4th St. Site Area: 199,506.6 sf(4.58 acres) Building Area(gross): A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments No comment. B.Policy-Related Comments No comment. C. Code-Related Comments The site will be served by King County Water District#90. Plans will be required per City of Renton Standards and will need signature approval by City staff for construction permits. 2 7 c? Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Lual5Oplb City of ., Department of Planning/Building/Pubiic rTra ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:— UAWtiLCL1iai SP_y`J, COMMENTS DUE: 12/1/00 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-150,PP,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 11/17/00 APPLICANT: Steven Beck PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth Higgins PROJECT TITLE: Amberwood Preliminary Plat WORK ORDER NO: 78756 LOCATION: 6001 NE 4th Street SITE AREA: 199,505.6 sf(4.58 acres) BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has proposed subdividing a 199,505 square foot(4.58 A) property, by means of the Preliminary Plat process, into 19 lots skitable for detached, single-family residences. An existing house and out-buildings would be removed. Access would be from NE 4 t Street to the north, via Rosario Avenue NE, and an extension of NE 3 Court to the west. Environmental review is required and a public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet ateaci6o/ B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS YJ1.14A- a/tt— 72/0 4/eXiy6et,C&- /CD C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS�E ita) f I Nvi,/Atite .,(77/1t We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. '14)(At045t17ae4 // /6 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date P Routing Rev 10/93 A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS "It is anticipated that the proposed development would generate future residents that would utilize existing City park and recreation facilities and programs. The City has adopted a Parks Mitigation Fee of$530.76 per each new single family lot to address these potential impacts." City of Ren$Department of Planning/Building/Public will ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Co v ts-hA ur SPA/lXez COMMENTS DUE: 12/1/00 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-150,PP,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 11/17/00 APPLICANT: Steven Beck PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth Higgins PROJECT TITLE: Amberwood Preliminary Plat WORK ORDER NO: 78756 C/}. N LOCATION: 6001 NE 4th Street 47,_ �`�N% SITE AREA: 199,505.6 sf(4.58 acres) I BUILDING AREA(gross): �� J6 .. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has proposed subdividing a 199,505 square foot(4.58 A) property, by ans of tlaj/�� Preliminary Plat process, into 19 lots suitable for detached, single-family residences. An existing house and out-buildi woulddt5e removed. Access would be from NE 4 Street to the north, via Rosario Avenue NE, and an extension of NE 3`d Court to : avest. Environmental review is required and a public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner. ‘VOA, A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants _ Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities . Animals Transportation _ Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS de/v"'°-/4-4A4'`‘`AL-- ° We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additi al information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Sig ure of Director Aut orized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 CITY JF RENTON ..� Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor • Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator • November 17, 2000 ; Mr. Lafe Hermansen Core Design, Inc. 4205—148th Avenue NE, #200 Bellevue, WA 98007 SUBJECT: . Amberwood Preliminary Plat Project No. LUA-00-150,PP,ECF, Dear Mr. Hermansen: • The .Development Planning'Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. • It is tentatively scheduled for"consideration by the.Environmental Review Committee on - December 12, 2000: Prior, to that. review, you; will' be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington, on January 16, 2001 at 9:00 AM to consider the proposed Preliminary Plat. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to,be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will 'be mailed,to you one "week before the hearing. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. Please contact me, at (425) 430-7382, if you have any questions. Sincerely, • � Elizabeth Higgins, AICP. Senior Planner • cc: Mr. & Mrs. David Johnson/Owners Mr:Steven Beck/Amberwood, LLC Aoceptanoo 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 - . Asar�:_ ._;__��,---.:_,_,__.___. ���,_--•---- Received: 11 / 1 /00 3:52PM; 4258857963 ;-> Northwest Brokers; Page 2 NOV. 1.200010 2:50PM CORE L' ` tiN INCJTO' 11 f ' 'RENO,.62I300 P•2'.04/04 `'hP`nt ly I M i IY,�WIYII/1 1 ^:•nT 1,ti�Y•Y V'�� .�. v1.Whh.<.�p....y�p ATaY•' ,r T+v PVrp1.� . S� 44 >r�• +..� i°wI�C;I � � >A� qP� F.Y.i�� Ina4. d q3,.. •r IY �fi}}II d "YY•~ M a• w r.Yw,v Na 41Ji4—iS;�,. ml ti'v4,^'0�n.I1 u�.•, ;..i,� � F^-r� 1 All Fd L � 1 h,! 'G r l�•.'R^;'•' X` i" . ^.T"14 4R"�,�ipry'Ix 1•"!6: N I Tn't• ,,rat �„ �'�r "�VA.V,:4•••••:...Y t ."• N �' �, i M. 1)1b"II`y,i1i6� T't•�`N � T.,y.,.,:?'y:i^y,,,4y�hb,W Q 4 14N . _��' J^5„i,�a 1LI.. N..Y �ti#•,'+' •^! Aaa,,��1'' ��,h'M'A'�Inp�;�q,r ,rx.� ; �:•.:E k, N� 'R` ;C �" t 1'� ti4'n plY'�F7C.�Y,:..�Sr',• w! N,a,""4 N,PIIn.h,l„�::'�"'° "�I'I. hH h.hl y�,�Y�VNi';���I'I.IYLLN�pIc�ry1� ,I�{1'I ....t.l' '1;r'SY. �' "� �•y> 'y�'',. .�. w.x '�'ai.,8hfw�.�y'y� 41,1l I,. y Ha, �'%�•a�•_!.i"h: 1.^wi 1 e-' OVA 4 V', fl h�I.4 ' v 'i h7l T��,'.IpN.il.hM Tp q i IM�,;�aa•lei+ I„r"' 4�,I I I MMww� �'N�+.l�i�v.15/� I I� '� �. 14 "1.:��`µ Li '"i'WI,¢Y.,i.i:K�",'i2'!;7. rutvi4 ,is3�.11 l7011 I1.1a:;i� lY"'+ai 5i�s':'4+>tti t ii, ;'y.I"' ,..:::•,2�c a 7h�y� "": ' ,154 e x ,��>�""^I,++ ^^' �, lY III! ,nev+ ' I �vP��7i�y/1, 1 1 hlglnl I.Y•` G,�e,�", •We I'$'. �'�"itii7xY.elo I'l.Y iY."h .•JJ.a. Ir..1y4.:Id�'•dSv �,� l.h`Z'�3¢o,P 'N 1.kI , �y, � +,i:' _F Z .•;S,.N••q' P. •tw„* ,d NIM 1 I I� �T„,v I,� i , A k'M' t, T •tla p i P IIW µ ' 'I ! .ti N>T ��+il�rJ ' r�.°G,�.'9z��•{�t+^n^!,'� e.�i;:.S� I t�S°' `�.+yy�'N�����y��1,pp11��a�'����II��'," '�'��'TJI I,'J�5o�lg}�K4���,�b1:ia+:N�,'. ICY I�dB t pal II ry ;'. �^I'hS�h+("W �n II!I.i. ',. , I N NV0y , d S:.I•:'IA*. ,,,.„,,.a,t',y,,T'x;.}1Si,1 ',' . I4% 'h14,4,:,h III�,.. IN 4,F.O If ,r„P1 J, Nh,4,',t'iI: ,'d; � 4bp I , � yyWlyu���Pn 1�1 ' k�% J •: �•+ ZN; $ hn 1 'v a a i;• Ai11II V ? I • 11. ,�' 4 i t ® ` l ; i I '• 4 4 I ♦ 41 ,1 I =r, I' ` 6Z4.. ��d,u. „ {' Yv i 'n+l " I I e �i;l�i N y J 1�r ram.'. $, h.?S'.l 4%;HhlaaI wG`.4' i ii M 61h I . 'IA „�,r II ',fi...- tys,i 1: .� 4 i Ih,luh,4 I I p��:,.r ;, +� i T7�'.l,i';�2:Y4 T� Iw�5 le kx �: I t,r ., �. � ,J. }ia a,:i I� 9 an yi'TI 'h' a ,Y'' m I P�I�xh >�are3a�1' �y r;Q' 'i''dd'1,.'l•' rl yh.�' ; h' !I�NM�pa•:I�. :6 "d,d `:427.7 I"I d d pT., t T,Gr'.'I 0, ti 6 gamma,G'F R: 4 ` I,,�!I �mJn+.,d.. T.'h n IIM„Y; �i ,,.ph''' .��,�', ��1�?). '• �:'k all,S, I�sj;s;� x�„i 161w l�n�;��rS�'lCiie; PROJECT NAME: 4NY wOtA7 rtre-i(mIN FLe APPLICATION NO: 1-UR• 0°• 150 , PP The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will'notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER • •;, `''• - I • • • (Attach additional sheets,if necessary) Received: 11 / 1 /00 3:53PM; 4258857963 -> Northwest Brokers; Page 3 r NOV. 1.2000°'C 2:50PM CORE 1, _ ,GN INCJTON 125`10.623'300 P•3'.05/07 ,(Continued) • NAME. • ADDRESS' ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Applicant Certification i,.3:TEeUe A 4 ,hereby certify that the above list(s)of adjacent property (Print Name) ,�.`�a�e owners and their addresses were obtained from: __��N E M• °`::111.11 t Title Company Records s QJY•'�ssioN•• at,;l King County Assessors Records Q:'sa +'•� NOTq '0 i •U , -- m13e Signed " — a Date /l/- 6)0 i '°VBLIC �'' (Applicant) .. A:•�,• l s o • NOTARY teeO�wASI•flN __-- A TTESTED: ibscribed and swam before mt�,a Notary Public,In and forthe state of Vl�a��ijngton, residing at . ?_erc.��� (' urns" on the day of 19 JoVErn iga , 20... • Signed C-- c1 toc.e... //I . re (Notary Publle) N. +'nN l��u liry'��o.hi L,'1' ii' Ali li i 1?,.i ... .. .�Nr�.;�V 1 ,.t l a,.•� y Y��:` '} 1 }•.`�•.c:::A.',«"t 4�..r,��r�,•I n�1 G:.., .,F.;� 1, J 55 W `{�,FF ,1���,;Il k.)4. r A i y y� 1 fJ� �:;i.�...t. I y NINd I�r•ir�ji .�n.� • ,' 1t }qp'n 1I."ht'jL.11• '!•' 1±.�� p��i ••yaA C.11'l'1' t' SG aLd,g�,I�,,U,+ i..:: .k: �,I14ALu4 M 1 •r} . 1111 t1q 1 I II 4#I.I;.} y ,N4�:II�.1"ppI��liM:.. �y�,,JJ I �•II11 ,�ry1;,,i�,n;.�rYRyi•1'.Xyyy+� 7,4ik ;�^:.: '� },.:') I' '», +.d 3 r ' •4'Id411.r,� 'tll Nlj�111F,'a ,.F,�i'; e �1: •nN V4.k9'i ;��! yy'I'�,Fr'NII• �l j i'I I''�h.,d,',��ili.��yfil�999.�a'.\`Wy lG tl�9'0.IY'�1,1K. I(# ,if��,/>(,4i JJ �,; �i lM1• . aF.4 �11yqI 41.0.w19:• ,,�A`�..,x.., ,, 1 I5�I?. ` x: ..awe I e,.. ..r•ra i�ti . • II.Ph i.a rm I a'' i. iG 1:8' .. �'p,3'}:K�Ik sI4M',•I�b"i Y�,•'Noil''ip.,µ a h g J� �A�7hJ I I I a.n. ,..�r,i� 1 •wl••lx'�/tP��x r dp' II f 1 4•,utiv?1].:.i,.;1:'. IF I h I } , u !F'Na'IBC 1 �'{W �.a.. ,.;1 w., f t iii'�,1a ,;�' f-'��I wr:.�"n! � MII at> j`,�'PP`,`�v�?I�iij'I��ku7 I�it Sn:�i1 r � IY, 1��'"4,'°h�}iWn I�I'h�l ' �`..a" !y...: ,.•• h . iP' Ji 'ai I Il !L•r.•�:;1' I 1�I[.p'I7 I4bh+Ni4.0 4'C� !�I I �, g, , , a),,,i 1 '>;„ ;;V,1 r, d ,1 J'1111 by .h�,,1�Nl i9�,„ „,„4 :r,.,, I •l ,,l PN I,-ll� h'li ItS45i,:..: Ir, .,,fir', 4"' I1. ,IF,'o �' i 1 I Fti�i l ;i/}'ia+a'9� 1'�lk;�aa,�atl x!!"'x" �'�"M 1��F/ t yxel ' �•��,• V�xi''I11E xlla y Itl l �,�d�.`! 'NN ` d J : I'ly N 1 1 t ',I ', • G Illgld141�1� I !�NAIh � � ,'1'}�`:+:•„ F �+ `1 x A {'{4 .'�'IN:�� �`;1 f it -, „.t, ri,~a1V1 11 i,i„+.x.•�lUt.. .04 QC,'` ii4 hi4 } g 1 a�.I S,,:7rt71 '6°Y� `{ J-�"i iY.a+II"'4N..l is�+e•4� ��,��• 'x1rl 9�d��''w '!�'..�i3` �NI g��41r�1�'�J{1y�F�dO, 'Q'�A: ''r�k � ,1'������/JM`'i4 r�, 1y`�b n��A,�71•' r J.FI rxn'xnT''lJlvib•I°�li i 1p�*r ;Jr�'%. �,OlPl �li : `sn Ijh'¢I' YdYiliiilP'I.II I«Nleii I@l4• ki:rrc .1¢� '•t w i'tg4'r''r'. : srw.;^ uY'Zr�..l� t,.lh'+•r, 1 1 m 1 Jl�oi•!,i titi .. 1 IllhIIlrtl �, : (� t VA+l ., 41 ? '. ' ( .�. `�SGIV4�y`�t.�ayVPuf.: ,,,,•, 'JA'��n �$ �•�,F { � �����;"p ""�ro4S�1,�`��;'n'� �"d'�; 3n�n,I•,w's! i ,q �? •E al, tg':Sat}ti p*.rt. :` • • s ,' ' cz�, �Ir .i57 01 �IFIII'i4�GI��IgPl d.L� ,-7 1x.• i'Y•d #7,:, N ++il 1,�,,. &•,, ,. . ? �ulaf y CA C ,���„ l,I..7�1...C..�ti:�{ya :�ti ° .,. � �r � �1�i'1..1'Ix�Ili'i�rdla"1,,.,"oT'itti'.,�' �':lail,.�7`irl� ;�ilewll,'! F�aa iM1l V w sw„w�e�ka���y �11 1 M1 a Er'T 'ue, ix Fix,' ma1hN"IlihilF t. {.RtS�°M1 ,Iree'• •' !i�I ixl^ 1 A .M `x ili6Plldl�I'1,Inr,�1 1�•�''11'�+,I:k tt,r hYnl�e'e�,�IiV,N,iriF tk'r'� �'a•'J:•g�•arySi,�a-�rgP•Me ,;J II{�'1 on.h}F,I ;u;.�"�•,,1.',',•." mr '}p�Vl:llwnel laxl�I�j�:I��p,�1 I . I 4 ..1v k, h.lrl•I',!•1'rl ;"i1 ii JJ N 1 'I rvi Nh4N ;1�3;iriNY� rI,rnit' nl`!., I'I'Y''llllllm 1s.,: hx°ih• l r rr j ,..: xp!hl W. II� ;ryy4 .•Frl'lil',Il. II���y t.. ril.. •'.':@ti�� pNri;'�r�, I i' I �< 'iIJ�Mh 1��.. N4}I.lmJ'0' r�l.•9 _. IyiaMor?.'� '�r�,�'!'1 h IDT;Itl'!Ir�4 1?I1 'N1'e.Jhl.k {� A•S ',J 'dt'd Y '�'h. 1 r ��141eill l� , ^+^}\+e`i!4 r'r tl - S't : 'I hl. ea:a:; 'k�Jb�'a�l;�!,tr...2Sa�'�2x 'C"roYdd�lii1°dl',X a;,It I • '��'W i I b hi�ppii I�Id .,h I - �ti'Wp ;u I{. q.��,•d.. ilal!N'Wkhl'�N41�1'I I� p,F+l iiai'y3�}`�'hYy��,q�� �. I Id'}�f r�J�l v' 1:7}'i'• '+.9.:4.d��4iM' N,h,4 41'4 IJ"II�I IM1N N,I i Y:�ky.•, r' tp4,•6x IN! II iI I'I yaly',�'x4•lr,�p•.•l,'I.R•,�•i.jyH I.1�'OVllj�GI,11 Flv F.4m•+•,�. �yl,1:G,t ��h*�*'Y'F F,'t,�Ia6'�O� �'dI�4J .'r.•.d�'�8'r u•r.��; •tlh�11,4Y1x1p�1r ml', '�`�. � dN'�I�I'�I'll%lil'jlp�µ'ItJlll 1,la•� ' � ' "1 I'J�'�'4'P.'aJ'IFIj 'ryT VV. 'C H.l�..,:•.Wit...;.. y1. I' �Ai�diJlldn�, {:;�Sb•7'FT r•II 1 , , y'd' x� 1° l I y ih4h,'l�I"n ii'r J.,Zie,, i dl�l IIJ"N I N,'hrlwrY r '",•a4!�:�'}i:lktl 14rxII�aA:W i1�ts.'�`y9•^ 1:1 "°�"''^(p "1u�F """'•�.•+ l' � `II' nd I xh d u.'S.sh ,�{•�o1y,i a r � wa •+lu 4x I'4h�`„4r4I•!Ea •w(.• r�:,:�q ! ...vow 4xh u�':,Cl.`3r'n,ek,,..,, '""3::, I�y�I I F FAN x `i nrn. toP�Ia191'pp11FI I+y41 rant ', ii•"i13�eG' Vi,e„u F i s�� ' ��! r :�'p11nx%9Y N y�,� `�}5i 'miLl l�., "li}I dry -. ,/aS�IIpp II��I�Dhl4'I VIII yyO17 SI ,11� <� vl'1 W b la�wd � ^r•;}•••,., IaIM tl�YA.IFI',y� �?irvlL:�.x�..�..; IFi��ld Ilr�r ryi'1� 1111�rv'Mv"'�Mld'4'r�l I��.Cq�. rY•Y�,I Nix'.bx Ii 4hFI J.l,':... f }A}. NJdr 011,4N "F .e drk''I'M1' P iI'�' �a ll�� I w1/i!i 1�,1, 'Cy' y 1� y LyR A L 'd'e Avd'• �''}, t1 M1l,�' b�, ,r�.J.7,k ,,, rya "5'�i 9fk �� 41 I' hN•I'Iirl I IIdI'�pe'IY x Y 4 • Y�1 p�y.�'wgly.'•I00�' � •,F M�� xY1`4. �NdNua, �F�i'FI' � A. •i•'ia.�h. WgIFI�4�V D? x' .I 7"I d pi4V1'1F'itlN�y '1' F I ` 7eh?k by '�ei„11;1�'II�''IN PMA4I�IM*�,"'"," ,.., ,�k:C^uL�In '* I Iry'y(v �� � II�! I 1 .i.":. Nark r x i 1�NN ., r, a F''A?''k',,.^.' A :, a `�7.�• ,6 y71111i 11 nM1 h'^�,••I '�„",N4�a"'�ar. I�+1 J• y0.::•`o F .b�ex• wka hn�Pn� II p. ! 0"114; '40 r • • ' ' '1 • '411111114y,$"l�tl� �t �[!,II�Ill F . a •I.12.41 7,�0 n 'i! rid �'� � 1, Y xl, x 1, •PIUF YIN }a'}Jx I 1 1J NI d i'k �1''G��' ��,,• '�'•41i'��Y �/1 'r �I� 9 I 1 r Iro U+�'LI. ;'�'"`: �yw W,I I I I ll4 K ,M1n � n al nl'a� �N H! 'i•:`:a�• •t•,'�i'r�i+ • 4r. ':alIb� II,,qq 7 '�IS�,a ' ,..A. I r I w I ' ArbU t 01 1 0• a a i , I �'., `"•' r'4:1..'A� �•Ykll rl/1�11111'k I , ': a II1y�j� r1 1J � �':1��V�•�ly:•y•��•' It 'b� /V✓I'CI14ML�J�.'IL., q'x.'rad'''� 1 J! 550 �r✓�I I,I.I I I I I �I 1 , 17 r IIIy1ai Imello A'el 4 4'xI. 'h 1,.x'Q J , d Ma A I'"11n 4,„ •}' iJ1,J'•u:'p V Nry 0.I I' I�lvlifFUni-.... Ilx ,'+�I.� 411.41 44N"7hx N 12 1.34.4. y> nY'PI I yFlxl N,�ppi,''II '��,.,����+'.r<� q i�Ihl'N'xl xrrp r INaW �"1.� �yp'I x�NJI,ln F'Ii'dip W•w I..ez r I�y pf I,.,�� ':y �:.` A{{ �I' i�M I 9'''. I IIN r S:"''�Y Ed}1, �0 'd, I xA •off' • .,.i..1 vl PW�'tl'1, A �4 Id'IY i ,..pd�__i',k', 1 14t rAl v wP'4jd��."�IJI�I�II'yIY�1,d 19Y�Id' 111' d'n yt.;: �fIIJ'.lM1 ip pl H ,,�d�' , 1,I ,w,��y�I �Mr h'"k'' I t '�r16iM• t sie t, rr I e'. ' li "a'l ar 1 • . YJ`4 `5 xYKNl41u11 r rtir ,< ; 5 2 ► d 1 '11'x hr •V •:t } I Ir 'i l' y 4,'I INR•ilfl x F�II tl :q.: (•t.i w• II Al, iy �I;w% . >"">w':,�;,'" wy ! 'I I �F i' roM} rSlilMM�i�w 11stpropldoo MARILYN NEFF ' tzkv o3Foo MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-25.03 • J - # 1 * MetroScan / King * ©wrier :J W Morrison Inc Parcel # ' :112305 9004 02 Site :*No Site Address* Sale Date Mail :PO Box 407 Kenmore Wa 98028 Sale Price Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$19, 050 Lgl :STR 112305 TAXLOT 4 W 1/2 OF SE Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac:19.05 YB: Ph: # 2 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Centex Homes Parcel # :112305 9011 03* Site :14832 SE 128Th St Renton 98059 Sale Date :05/25/1999 Mail :2320 130Th Ave NE #200 Bellevue Wa 98005 Sale Price :$2,520, 000 Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$300,000 Lgl :STR 112305 TAXLOT 11 E 1/2 OF SW Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:720 Ac:18.16 YB:1946 Ph: # 3 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Ribera-Balko Enterprises Family Limited Parcel # :112305 9015 09 Site :5715 NE 4Th P1 Renton 98059 Sale Date :12/31/1991 Mail :16400 Southcenter Pkwy #308 Seattle Wa 98188 Sale Price Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$182,000 Lgl :STR 112305 TAXLOT 15 SW 1/4 OF SW Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ /1 Stories:1 BldgSF:1,590 Ac:1. 96 YB:1963 Ph: # 4 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Olding Terry L Parcel # :112305 9017 07 Site :466 Nile Ave NE Renton 98059 Sale Date :01/28/1991 Mail :12614 148Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$127, 000 Lgl :STR 112305 TAXLOT 17 NW 1/4 OF SW Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:1,330 Ac: .70 YB:1930 Ph: # 5 * MetroScan / King * Owner :The Mullins Family Trust Parcel # :112305 9018 06 Site :5800 NE 4Th St Renton 98059 Sale Date :03/16/1998 Mail :18631 120Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98058 Sale Price Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$125, 000 Lgl :STR 112305 TAXLOT 18 W 1/2 OF SE Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:1,200 Ac:1.05 YB:1931 Ph: # 6 * MetroScan / King * Owner :The Mullins Family Trust Parcel # :112305 9020 02 Site :*No Site Address* Sale Date :03/16/1998 Mail :18631 120Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98058 Sale Price Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$75, 000 Lgl :STR 112305 TAXLOT 20 E 1/2 OF SE Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac:1.05 YB: Ph: # 7 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Mullenberg Dean J/Carolyn L Trustees;Utd Parcel # :112305 9021 01 Site :5816 NE 4Th St Renton 98059 Sale Date :02/13/1998 Mail :5816 NE 4Th St Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$136, 000 Lgl :STR 112305 TAXLOT 21 W 1/2 OF NE Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:1,290 Ac:1.26 YB:1943 Ph: # 8 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Mullenberg Dean J/Carolyn L Trustees;Utd Parcel # :112305 9023 09 Site :*No Site Address* Sale Date :02/13/1998 Mail :12622 148Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$85, 000 Lgl :STR 112305 TAXLOT 23 E 1/2 OF NE Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac:1.26 YB: Ph: # 9 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Lackey Charles Parcel # :112305 9030 00 Site :*No Site Address* Sale Date Mail :5902 NE 4Th St Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$175, 000 Lgl :STR 112305 TAXLOT 30 S 378.8 FT OF Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: . 97 YB: Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. IF r # 10 * MetroScan / King - * Owner :Ng Properties Llc Parcel # :112305 9093 04 Site :*No Site Address* Sale Date :01/17/1996 Mail :6234 139Th Pl SE Bellevue Wa 98006 Sale Price :$93,000 Full Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$115, 000 Lgl :STR 112305 TAXLOT 93 S 227 FT OF Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac:1.55 YB: Ph: # 11 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Rogers Mark C & Lynnette M Parcel # :142305 9003 00 Site :15240 SE 132Nd St Renton 98059 Sale Date :10/24/1990 Mail :15240 SE 132Nd St Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price . Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$298, 000 Lgl :STR 142305 TAXLOT 3 W 595.72 FT OF Q:NW S:14 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/1 / Stories:2 B1dgSF:2, 600 Ac:4.50 YB:1986 Ph:425-255-3107 # 12 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Finer Homes Inc Parcel # :142305 9004 09 Site :*No Site Address* Sale Date . Mail :1215 120Th Ave NE #201 Bellevue Wa 98005 Sale Price . Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$288, 000 Lgl :STR 142305 TAXLOT 4 W 1/2 OF NE Q:NW S:14 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac:14.43 YB: Ph: # 13 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Buttar Baljinder/Rashpal Parcel # :142305 9016 05 Site :148Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Sale Date :10/05/1999 Mail :5766 146Th Ave NE Bellevue Wa 98007 Sale Price :$430, 000 Full Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$120,000 Lgl :STR 142305 TAXLOT 16 N 500 FT OF W Q:NW S:14 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: A1dgSF: Ac:4.21 YB: Ph: # 14 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Finer Homes Inc Parcel # :142305 9017 04 Site :*No Site Address* Sale Date Mail :1215 120Th Ave NE #201 Bellevue Wa 98005 Sale Price . Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$592, 000 Lgl :STR 142305 TAXLOT 17 W 1/2 OF W Q:NW S:14 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac:29.62 YB: Ph: # 15 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Ribera-Balko Enterprises Family Limited Parcel # :142305 9021 08 Site :5845 NE 4Th St Renton 98059 Sale Date :12/31/1991 Mail :16400 Southcenter Pkwy #308 Seattle Wa 98188 Sale Price . Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$248, 000 Lgl :STR 142305 TAXLOT 21 E 225 FT OF N Q:NW S:14 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1.5 BldgSF:2,510 Ac:4 . 63 YB:1942 Ph: # 16 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Hong Josaphat & Assumpta Parcel # :142305 9062 08 Site :15409 SE 128Th St Renton 98059 Sale Date :05/18/1990 Mail :15409 SE 128Th St Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price :$199,000 Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$205,000 Lgl :STR 142305 TAXLOT 62 NE 1/4 OF NE Q:NW S:14 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:1/1 / Stories:1 BldgSF:2, 160 Ac:2.30 YB:1964 Ph: # 17 * MetroScan / King * Owner :King County Parcel # :142305 9063 07 Site :*No Site Address* Sale Date :04/30/1993 Mail :500 K C Admin Bldg Seattle Wa 98104 Sale Price :$150,000 Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$135,000 Lgl :STR 142305 TAXLOT 63 E 518.01 FT Q:NW S:14 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac:4 .70 YB: Ph: # 18 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Leifer Irvin T Parcel # :142305 9064 06 Site :15325 SE 128Th St Renton 98059 Sale Date . Mail :15223 SE 128Th St Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price . Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$205, 000 Lgl :STR 142305 TAXLOT 64 E 866.01 FT Q:NW S:14 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ /1 Stories:1 BldgSF:1, 850 Ac:2. 69 YB:1945 Ph:425-228-3988 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. # 19 * MetroScan / King - * Owner :Smith Kenneth Paul Sr Parcel # :142305 9069 01 Site :15402 SE 132Nd St Renton 98059 Sale Date :08/28/1985 Mail :15402 SE 132Nd St Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price :$29,500 Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$220,000 Lgl :STR 142305 TAXLOT 69 LOT 1 OF KC Q:NW S:14 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 /1 Stories:1 BldgSF:1, 840 Ac:1.05 YB:1987 Ph:425-226-4899 # 20 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Leifer Randall D/Rosemary M Parcel # :142305 9070 08 Site :15311 SE 128Th St Renton 98059 Sale Date :03/08/1991 Mail :5127 S Fountain St Seattle Wa 98178 Sale Price Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$269, 000 Lgl :STR 142305 TAXLOT 70 W 150 FT OF E Q:NW S:14 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:5 Bth F3H:1/1 /1 Stories:2 BldgSF:2,590 Ac:2.10 YB:1992 Ph: # 21 * MetroScan / King * Owner :King County Parcel # :142305 9071 07 Site :*No Site Address* Sale Date :01/18/1994 Mail :500 4Th Ave Seattle Wa 98104 Sale Price :$376,730 Full Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$135, 000 Lgl :STR 142305 TAXLOT 71 S 1/2 OF N Q:NW S:14 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac:4. 67 YB: Ph:206-296-0100 # 22 * MetroScan / King * Owner :King County Parcel # :142305 9072 06 Site :*No Site Address* Sale Date :01/18/1994 Mail :500 4Th Ave Seattle Wa 98104 Sale Price :$376,730 Full Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$135, 000 Lgl :STR 142305 TAXLOT 72 N 1/4 OF POR Q:NW S:14 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac:4. 67 YB: Ph:206-296-0100 # 23 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Mason William W Parcel # :142305 9073 05 Site :13111 156Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Sale Date . Mail :13111 156Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price . Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$151,000 Lgl :STR 142305 TAXLOT 73 N 78.765 FT Q:NW S:14 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 / Stories:1 BldgSF:1,320 Ac: .22 YB:1966 Ph:425-227-4241 # 24 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Kelloniemi Marilyn L Parcel # :142305 9079 09 Site :15416 SE 132Nd St Renton 98059 Sale Date :10/30/1984 Mail :23629 7Th Ave W Bothell Wa 98021 Sale Price :$1,499 Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$157, 000 Lgl :STR 142305 TAXLOT 79 POR OF NE 1/4 Q:NW S:14 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:2/ /1 Stories:1 BldgSF:1,520 Ac: .37 YB:1967 Ph: # 25 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Fire District 25 Parcel # :142305 9095 09 Site :12923 156Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Sale Date . Mail :1055 S Grady Way Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price . Use :172 Pub,Governmental Service Asd.V :$503, 854 Lgl :STR 142305 TAXLOT 95 E 420.01 FT Q:NW S:14 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 BldgSF:7,732 Ac:1.35 YB:1974 Ph: # 26 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Puget Sound Energy/Elec Parcel # :142305 9106 06 Site :*No Site Address* Sale Date Mail :PO Box 90868 Bellevue Wa 98009 Sale Price . Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V . Lgl :STR 142305 TAXLOT 106 N 250 FT OF Q:NW S:14 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .79 YB: Ph: # 27 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Godsoe Carl T & Kathleen R Parcel # :142305 9114 06 Site :15418 SE 132Nd St Renton 98059 Sale Date :11/20/1984 Mail : 9201 Blackberry St #11 Anchorage Ak 99515 Sale Price . Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$291, 000 Lgl :STR 142305 TAXLOT 114 LOT 2 LESS S Q:NW S:14 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:2/1 / Stories:2 B1dgSF:4, 670 Ac:1.01 YB:1988 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. # 28 * MetroScan / King - * Owner :Crosslin Lon A Parcel # :142305 9115 05 Site :15430 SE 132Nd St Renton 98059 Sale Date :04/28/1987 Mail :15430 SE 132Nd St Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price :$28,500 Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$183,000 Lgl :STR 142305 TAXLOT 115 LOT 3 LESS W Q:NW S:14 •T:23N R:05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:2/ /1 Stories:1 BldgSF:3,280 Ac: .98 YB:1955 Ph:425-204-1660 # 29 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Tacher Michael G & Shaunna J Parcel # :142305 9116 04 Site :15514 SE 132Nd St Renton 98059 Sale Date :11/20/1984 Mail :15514 SE 132Nd St Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price . Use :008 Res,Mobile Home Asd.V :$120, 000 Lgl :STR 142305 TAXLOT 116 PP ACT Q:NW S:14 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac:1.08 YB: Ph:425-226-9460 # 30 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Not Available From County Parcel # :935330 0690 03 Site :12452 155Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Sale Date :12/10/1998 Mail :12452 155Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price . Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$109,200 Lgl :BLK 3 LOT 7 WHITE FENCE RANCH Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:1, 370 Ac: .25 YB:1961 Ph: # 31 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Goonan Martin J Parcel # : 935330 0700 01 Site :12610 155Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Sale Date :06/08/2000 Mail :12610 155Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price . Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$141, 000 Lgl :BLK 3 LOT 8 WHITE FENCE RANCH Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 B1dgSF:1,270 Ac: .25 YB:1961 Ph: # 32 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Bilodeau Marcellena M Parcel # : 935330 0710 09 Site :12618 155Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Sale Date :05/13/1994 Mail :12618 155Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price . Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$146, 000 Lgl :BLK 3 LOT 9 WHITE FENCE RANCH Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:1,270 Ac: .25 YB:1962 Ph: # 33 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Herger Ron A Jr Parcel # :935330 0720 07 Site :12626 155Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Sale Date :07/31/2000 Mail :12626 155Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price :$122, 000 Full Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$139, 000 Lgl :BLK 3 LOT 10 WHITE FENCE RANCH Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ /1 Stories:1 BldgSF:1,210 Ac: .25 YB:1961 Ph: # 34 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Maggard Jolene Parcel # : 935330 0730 05 Site :*No Site Address* Sale Date :09/25/1997 Mail :16023 SE 135Th St Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price :$10, 000 Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$30, 000 Lgl :BLK 3 LOT 11 WHITE FENCE RANCH Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac: .25 YB: Ph: # 35 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Shines Dolores S Parcel # : 935330 0740 03 Site :12638 155Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Sale Date :06/27/2000 Mail :12638 155Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price :$179, 000 Full Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$139, 000 Lgl :BLK 3 LOT 12 WHITE FENCE RANCH Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:1, 350 Ac: .25 YB:1962 Ph: # 36 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Knab Harold F Jr Parcel # :935330 0750 00 Site :12646 155Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Sale Date :12/28/1999 Mail :12646 155Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price . Use :008 Res,Mobile Home Asd.V :$89, 169 Lgl :BLK 3 LOT 13 WHITE FENCE RANCH Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .25 YB: Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. # 37 * MetroScan / King - * Owner :Cummings William R/Ida M Parcel # :935330 0760 08 Site :12652 155Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Sale Date :04/20/1998 Mail :12652 155Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price . Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$183, 000 Lgl :BLK 3 LOT 14 WHITE FENCE RANCH Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:2/ /1. Stories:1 BldgSF:2,250 Ac: .25 YB:1969 Ph: # 38 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Sims Robert N Parcel # :935330 0770 06 Site :*No Site Address* Sale Date :01/10/1996 Mail :12815 SE 218Th P1 Kent Wa 98031 Sale Price . Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$25, 000 Lgl :BLK 3 LOT 15 WHITE FENCE RANCH Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .25 YB: Ph: # 39 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Nelson Emil/Rosemary A Parcel # : 935330 0780 04 Site :15414 SE 128Th St Renton 98059 Sale Date :01/27/1997 Mail :7219 S 128Th St Seattle Wa 98178 Sale Price . Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$140,000 Lgl :BLK 3 LOT 16 WHITE FENCE RANCH Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ /1 Stories:1 BldgSF:1,250 Ac: .25 YB:1961 Ph:206-772-1752 # 40 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Sawyer Ernest C/Mary Jane Parcel # :935330 0790 02 Site :12657 155Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Sale Date :04/19/1999 Mail :12657 155Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price . Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$146, 000 Lgl :BLK 3 LOT 17 WHITE FENCE RANCH Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 B1dgSF:1,560 Ac: .25 YB:1961 Ph:425-271-2901 # 41 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Van Ditto Scott A/Danette C Parcel # : 935330 0800 00 Site :12651 155Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Sale Date :07/09/1992 Mail :12651 155Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price . Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$144, 000 Lgl :BLK 3 LOT 18 WHITE FENCE RANCH Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:1/ /1 Stories:1 BldgSF:1,500 Ac: .25 YB:1961 Ph: # 42 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Christianson Kenneth & Lind Parcel # : 935330 0810 08 Site :12643 155Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Sale Date . Mail :12643 155Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price . Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$146,000 Lgl :BLK 3 LOT 19 WHITE FENCE RANCH Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:1/ /1 Stories:1 BldgSF:1,530 Ac: .25 YB:1962 Ph: # 43 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Shane Andrea C Parcel # :935330 0820 06 Site :12635 155Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Sale Date :10/03/1997 Mail :12635 155Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price :$138,500 Full Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$139, 000 Lgl :BLK 3 LOT 20 WHITE FENCE RANCH Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 B1dgSF:1,250 Ac: .25 YB:1961 Ph:425-430-8711 # 44 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Lee Joshua C;Brummett Carrie M Parcel # :935330 0830 04 Site :12627 155Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Sale Date :03/31/1994 Mail :12627 155Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price :$120,500 Full Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$138, 000 Lgl :BLK 3 LOT 21 WHITE FENCE RANCH Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:1,200 Ac: .25 YB:1962 Ph: # 45 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Segaran Chandra/Randi C Parcel # :935330 0840 02 Site :12619 155Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Sale Date :05/22/1992 Mail :12619 155Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price :$100, 000 Full Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$138, 000 Lgl :BLK 3 LOT 22 WHITE FENCE RANCH Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:1/ /1 Stories: 1 BldgSF:1,200 Ac: .25 YB:1962 Ph:425-271-8442 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. # 46 • * MetroScan / King - dwner :Deshaw Ruth E Parcel # : 935330 0850 09 Site :12611 155Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Sale Date . Mail :12611 155Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$145,000 Lgl :BLK 3 LOT 23 WHITE FENCE RANCH Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 B1dgSF:1, 600 Ac: .25 YB:1963 Ph:425-226-3120 # 47 * . . MetroScan / King Owner :Deshaw Ruth E Parcel # : 935330 0860 07 Site :*No Site Address* Sale Date :05/31/2000 Mail :12611 155Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price :$20, 000 Full Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$30, 000 Lgl :BLK 3 LOT 24 WHITE FENCE RANCH Q:SW S:11 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .25 YB: Ph: • The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. -Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 5160® , J W MORRISON INC CENTEX HOMES RIBERA-BALKO ENTERPRISES PO Box 407 . 2320 130Th Ave NE#200 16400 Southcenter Pkwy#30 Kenmore, WA 98028 Bellevue, WA 98005 Seattle, WA.981.88 112305 9004 112305 9011 112305 9015 Terry L Olding Mullins Family Trust The Mullins Family Trust The 12614 148Th Ave SE 18631 120Th Ave SE 18631 120Th Ave SE Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98058 Renton, WA 98058 112305 9017 112305 9018 112305 9020 Dean J& Carolyn L Mullenberg Dean J& Carolyn L Mullenberg Charles Lackey 5816 NE 4Th St 12622 148Th Ave SE 5902 NE 4Th St Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 112305 9021 112305 9023 112305 9030 NG PROPERTIES LLC Mark C &Lynnette M Rogers FINER HOMES INC 6234 139Th P1 SE 15240 SE 132Nd St 1215 120Th Ave NE#201 Bellevue, WA 98006 Renton, WA 98059 Bellevue, WA 98005 112305 9093 142305 9003 142305 9004 Baljinder&Rashpal Buttar FINER HOMES INC RIBERA-BALKO ENTERPRISES 5766 146Th Ave NE 1215 120Th Ave NE#201 16400 Southcenter Pkwy#30 Bellevue, WA 98007 Bellevue, WA 98005 Seattle, WA 98188 142305 9016 142305 9017 142305 9021 Josaphat&Assumpta Hong KING COUNTY Irvin Leifer 15409 SE 128Th St 500 K C Admin Bldg 15223 SE 128Th St Renton, WA 98059 Seattle, WA 98104 Renton, WA 98059 142305 9062 142305 9063 142305 9064 Kenneth Paul Smith Sr. Randall D &Rosemary M Leifer KING COUNTY 15402 SE 132Nd St 5127 S Fountain St 500 4Th Ave Renton, WA 98059 Seattle, WA 98178 Seattle, WA 98104 142305 9069 142305 9070 142305 9071 KING COUNTY William W Mason Marilyn L Kelloniemi 500 4Th Ave 13111 156Th Ave SE 23629 7Th Ave W Seattle, WA 98104 Renton, WA 98059 Bothell, WA 98021 142305 9072 142305 9073 142305 9079 FIRE DISTRICT 25 Sound Energy&Elec Puget Carl T&Kathleen R Godsoe 1055 S Grady Way PO Box 90868 9201 Blackberry St#11 Renton, WA 98055 Bellevue, WA 98009 Anchorage, AK 99515 142305 9095 142305 9106 142305 9114 Lon A Crosslin Michael G& Shaunna J Tacher Walter L Bonson 15430 SE 132Nd St 15514 SE 132Nd St 12452 155Th Ave SE Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 142305 9115 142305 9116 935330 0690 414 AVERY® Address Labels Lacer Si An® Smooth Feed Sheets"' Use template for 5160® Martin J Goonan Marcellena M Bilodeau Ron A Herger Jr. 12610 155Th Ave SE 12618 155Th Ave SE 12626 155Th Ave SE Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 935330 0700 935330 0710 935330 0720. Jolene Maggard Dolores S Shines Harold F Knab Jr. 16023 SE 135Th St 12638 155Th Ave SE 12646 155Th Ave SE Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 935330 0730 935330 0740 935330 0750 William R&Ida M Cummings Robert N Sims Emil &Rosemary A Nelson 12652 155Th Ave SE 12815 SE 218Th Pl 7219 S 128Th St Renton, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98031 Seattle, WA 98178 935330 0760 935330 0770 935330 0780 Ernest C &Mary Jane Sawyer Scott A&Danette C Van Ditto Kenneth&Lind Christianson 12657 155Th Ave SE 12651 155Th Ave SE 12643 155Th Ave SE Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 935330 0790 935330 0800 935330 0810 Andrea C Shane Joshua C Lee Chandra&Randi C Segaran 12635 155Th Ave SE 12627 155Th Ave SE 12619 155Th Ave SE Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 935330 0820 935330 0830 935330 0840 • Ruth E Deshaw Ruth E Deshaw 12611 155Th Ave SE 12611 155Th Ave SE Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 935330 0850 935330 0860 I//.\ AVGI?V(R) Arlrlrccc I ahale I=car IZ1An® • Ui'VY �� 1 Proposed Mitigation Measures: y®y 1. The applicant shall Install a silt fence along the downsiope perimeter of the area that is to be disturbed. The sill ,,t, fence shall be in place before clearing and grading Is initiated,and shall be constructed In conformance with the • • •r specifications presented in Section D.4.3.1 of the King County Surface Water Design Manual.This will be required . L4jurr0 • during the construction of both off-site and on-site Improvements was well as building construction. ' 2. Shallow drainage swales shall be constructed to Intercept surface water flow and route the flow away from the NOTICE OF APPLICATION I construction area to a stabilized discharge point. Vegetation growth shall be established In the ditch by seeding or AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- placing sod. Depending on site grades,It may be necessary to line the ditch with rock to protect the ditch from erosion and to reduce flow rates.The design end construction of drainage males shall conform to the specifications SIGNIFICANCE r MITIGATED (DNS-M) presented in Section 4.4.1 of the 1990 SWDM. Temporary pipe systems can also be used to convey slormwater acrobuilding ss the site. This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site Improvements as well as 3. The project contractor shall perform daily review and maintenance of all erosion and sedimentation control measures at the site during the construction of both off-site and on-site Improvements as well as building construction. DATE: November 17,2000 4. Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-0O.150,PP,ECF revision to maintenance schedules or Installation shall be submitted by the project Engineer of record to the public works Inspector for the construction of the civil improvements of the plat. Certification of the installation, APPLICATION NAME: AMBERWOOD PRELIMINARY PLAT maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities shall be required prier to recording of the plat. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant has proposed subdividing a 199,505 sq.ft.(4.58 A)property,by 5. The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee at the rate of 575.00 per means of the Preliminary Plat process,into 19 lots suitable for detached,single-family residences. An existing house weekday trip attributable to the project,estimated to be 9.55 average weekday trips per new reside each each ndnce.Th ce.The i and out-buildings would be removed.Access would be from NE 4 Street to the north,via Rosario Avenue NE,and an Transportation Mitigation Fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. e extension of NE 3 Court to the west. Environmental review is required and a public hearing before the city of Renton Hearing Examiner. 6. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$488.00 per each new single family residential u lot created by the proposed plat.The fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. PROJECT LOCATION: 6001 NE 4 Street 7. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee at the rate of 5530.76 per each new single family OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS,M):As the Lead Agency,the City of residential lot.The fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be Issued.Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into Comments on the above application must be submitted In writing to Ms.Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner,Development a single comment period.There will be no comment period following the Issuance of the Threshold Determination of Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on December 1,2000.This matter is also Nan-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M).A 14-day appeal period will follow the Issuance of the DNS-M. scheduled for a public hearing on January 16,2001,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Seventh Floor,Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton.If you are Interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: November 13,2000 Division,(425)430-7282,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled.If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: November 17,2000 before the Hearing Examiner.If you have questions about this proposal,ar wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,please contact the project manager.Anyone who submits written comments will Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Preliminary Plat Approval automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. Other Permits which may be required: Construction permits,grading license,building permits CONTACT PERSON: ELIZABETH HIGGINS-(425)430-7382 Requested Studies: Geelechnical Engineering Report,Traffic Impact Study,Storm Drainage Report,wetland reconnaissance (PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION (. Location where application may �° -pI ➢�+ c+'—'- -` "..e.•--. ,- be reviewed: Planning1BuildinglPublic Works Division,Development Services Department, r K vI y O -0 - i • Sixth Floor,Renton City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 _- 4 ��- • x ' PUBLIC HEARING:• Public hearing scheduled for January 16,2001,before the Renton Hearing .ri ......,.. li• 3:,�9 t 'p. { L " Examiner in Renton Council Chambers.Hearings begin a19:00 AM on the 7th `°mi ) .}` i•- . . „ floor of the Renton City Hail located at 1055 Grady Way South. 7g e. e e-® ° , E:�424�: 0,, CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: -t �. -± ,,,, ,° ,� �,,, .. - - J}? 7 11 - Land Use: single family residential i m i i .... Zoning: Residential 5(five dwelling units per net acre) — i .� , �0�� 5 111 Environmental Documents that r 0 I ° q �.. us or_a. , Evaluate the Proposed Project: Geotechniwl Engineering Report,Traffic Impact Study,Storm Drainage Report, k I ( ° Bt0' Id u�• 1wetland reconnaissance 1 _A/1_4 r Development Regulations • .I -1 Z y Used For Project Mitigation: Renton Municipal Code,State Environmental Policy Act,1998 King County rt ..1 - • w..0" Surface Water Design Manual requirements Z t. 1 • p r m.. ©,,f fh7 I�1Lw0 r „im`� ` I. • ,t pp J{ sy 't F� NOTICEOFAPPLICAPON �'ul'I i pa,f l:Rt_IT f E St 1;65:e." NOTICEOFAPPLICATON " e"` CERTIFICATION I, I -�;i,rltt d-'Q. .,__ ra J , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on . MO. /7, Zco . Signed: ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public,in and for the State of Washington residing ilij -0->r, , on the 30 t,day o (9 0, 2.0e,o . �"1 ' Fir' Y'd9.LS'N KAMCHEFF , 4 NOTARY PUBLIC ... STATE OF WAS HINGTON ' MARILYN KAMCHEFF • COMMISSION EXPIRES MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-2903 JIJNE 29, 2003 r :::: 111 €s >: ;: > >1111::'1 i;:;; >:..' :.. AN.D....0 S G:.PER . ; :: :>: .;<:>:>::::' >:> ''::::>' <:>< lial :>:::«:11 <':::`51 ............. : 11tT. ..................................:. . . .........................::::::::::....... JVIASTER� . 1.-�, I�` 1 ... .::::..........::::.................... .. :..::..::. .. ....................... .................................. ............................:....... ........................... .... • .::::::::::......:::.:........:::... *Wit it m r ..:haroneae al>'otne rlsats...3..�a..t:acf.:�r:aYadd::,..`t:itin::: :af:.:d.M t r..App t. n.to:e.ach.owne ,.:........:............ .......................... PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: David & Nancy Johnson Amberwood O PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: `4��,��% ADDRESS: 6001 NE 4th Street 6001 NE 4th. Street 4j CITY: Renton WA ZIP: 98059 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): Tax Parcel # 1423059020 TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND USE(S): Single' Family....residental.. . , ....................................................................................................... ...... ............................ <::: .'P .:L ICANT> If'oth.... an<owner :: ><::<::>:>:>:::: • PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: Steven Beck 19-detached single family residen,-,. tial COMPANY (if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Amberwood, L.L.C. Residential rural • ADDRESS: 19129 SE 145th Street PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): NSA CITY: Rento•n WA ZIP: 98059 EXISTING ZONING: R-5 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 253-770-8100 PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): N/ A . SITE,AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): NAME: Lafe Hermansen • :4 . 58 -acres or .199,505. 6 sq. ft. COMPANY (if applicable): • PROJECT VALUE: C.oNS-112.ut.'116NI Co S S ;{,5OD,vv) ( PAX) •Core Design, Inc. A(,Q.-. MA2 r Vkvt: 1,Z 3Siooa CPc►PP&'X) ADDRESS: 4 2 0 5 14 8 th Avenue NE, #2 0 0 - IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? - 140 CITY: • Bellevue WA 9 U O7 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? TELEPHONE NUMBER and E-MAIL ADDRESS: NlD 425-885-7877 LBH@coredesigninc.com M • • ti t:::?i:.::�::::::::i::::::::i:•i:�:::::::::�::::::.�.::.:w:::�.:::a:::: '..:.o.is ii::�i?::i::.�:}i:::;:::::.v:.::�::::::•:i::•::::�:::::.�:::::.�:.�:.�:i:viii::::; '..�.�i}:::.�::::::.�.�::::v::::�:i•... :::: : '... ::�.�:: ::::..�:.: ::: .. �:�:.�:: :i.i:.i:.i}ii:.i:S:iii:^ii:i.::.iii:.ii:<.:<.: ..:1•: .: ii:' . ry: .. :. :.i...:ii:i.::.:ii:.iii:.::: v. v:.:.:::: .'.:.i:.:i:'4:Y. :.i:.:i�i::•:^i::::.ii:'•::.:i:v.i::. :+iiii:.i...•:ii:.ii:<.i:.:i::i:.:�: i .......................:... :::>::<:::LE.GAL>::D.ES „pTlt7►l�t .0�>)�ROPERTY`::>A't�ach::se --ate:sheet..f nec 4 Please see attached. IOnu:::!';. .:EE;::. ''> '>> > << >> > '« < ;: :........................................:' ';: -Ci�` staf: will determif o,iiifees`: : ?< ;; : `: :::;::;:::•:: :.:: :::::::: :::;::;;::;:::;:::Ch'eck€'alla . . ca. . .n... . .. s..t.. t... t. .... — ANNEXATION . $ SUBDIVISION: _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ _ REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _ SPECIAL PERMIT $ — SHORT PLAT - $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ TENTATIVE PLAT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _X PRELIMINARY PLAT $ _ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ — FINAL PLAT $ _ GRADE &_FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ _ VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY _ WAIVER $ FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT $ ROUTINE VEGETATION— MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ _ VARIANCE $ — EXEMPTION $No Charge _ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ REVISION $ ;AFFIDA'..)T<OF:OWNERSHIP.: : :::: > '>: :: ::::»` :< ::»:<: I, (Print Name)(.4 /% ;7;://4// , declare that I am (please check one),K the owner of the property involved in this application,_the authorized representative to act for the property owner (please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted ar=jr,Lke� ects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. _ i‘ %J�•.. 4\ON F'I.e'•��l/ ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and 44,6......0 ` 7*----- Ry 9�., for the State of S esiding at �1rr C (Blame-of Own t/Representative) j :0 cn: i L'OLy , on the(OTU day of XCTbBE2 U PUBL�G 20(��. (Signatur -of caner/Representative) f It 1 I s _-� --y� 1\\;FW?Snaof rNotar�yPub c) St f_`' oaee >ti ':.Citof ' << :. <<[>i �:>: .> , ' > >>> . This:section::::fo:4e.c. m td ::.::. :.: .. ,:.;:.,.. : .::.::.:.: S ... P.. ......CAP::U ::>:.CPA: :':CU`=A<::>Clf°=.H :. .LLA :: :::Ctt..;:File.Number., :. :;.:..:.: .t�7C7:::..���'..:: A�;:.:.AAD.;:.;::B:.P .CA::.::S:::.::..:::..: ...:::.::..::::...:....: .::: :.: : :. ..::::.. ;:'. >:.;:.>;:>::::«:>::»::: :,»:. . :. : ::»::> . :::::.: ..;:.;:;.:. : ::.. ..... . .::.S:RL;H;:.;:.;Sp.;:.;:SM<:::..:SME>:>::>TP:::> 1l�A .. .-H r/V:>: :;::<:,, ::<. ;>M.HF:.;:.;:.�.PUC�.;:.;:.;�:: .P:::R.::...RUMP.....SQ.A..::SA....:H::: SHPI..A:..: N.. ......... .....:... :...:::..... :».:::::<:<><:>:>:>:>:><::.....:> >:...:> TA::.:._.F...E.E. S...'....>S......`....... `.3... IP...M......i.........:..:...........:..!...:....T....O...T....A. L'POST GEPROVIDED !- ::::' i iN:dP:i > : ':<:: - ; :.:<.. MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 03/00 f�1 ',N OF P9ENTON F. CEIVED JAN 3 0 2001 PROJECT NARRATIVE BUILDING DIVt6 ON Amberwood is located at 6001 NE 4th Street in Renton, Washington. The site will have two access points one from NE 4th Street located in the northeastern portion of the site and a second access point will occur with a connection to the Maplewood Estates development to the West of the site. The zoning for the property is R-5 and the site currently has one single-family residence along with its associated out buildings. The existing vegetation on the site consists of a combination of coniferous trees, deciduous trees, and a variety of shrubs and plants associated with the landscaping of a single-family residence. The property to the West and the South of the site is the Maplewood Estates development, which is currently under construction. To the east of the site is a single-family residence currently used as a rental property. The north side of the site is bordered by NE 4trt Street. The site is generally flat and slopes gently to the southwest corner at approximately 5%. According to the Geotechnical Report by Terra Associates, Inc., written September 15, 2000, the site is entirely underlain by Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam, (0 to 6 percent) which is considered a moderately well drained soil. Other than the over grown vegetation, no other special features such as wetland areas or steep slopes exist on the site. This application proposes a 18 lot preliminary plat on the 4.63-acre site under the existing requirements for an R-5 zone. The average lot size will be 7,849 S.F. and the proposed density is 4.78 DU/AC. The homes are anticipated to be in the middle income price range. The proposal will require the removal of one single- family residence and its associated out buildings. Construction of the site will result in 90-95% of the site being developed and will require the removal of most of the existing vegetation. The purpose of the grading and clearing is to construct the proposed public streets to city standards and to provide building pads and utility locations for the single-family residences. The grading is intended to be balanced on-site, with all cut and fill material originating from within the site. The development will provide the appropriate on-site stormwater management facilities as indicated on the site plan. Storm water runoff from the site will be routed to a 2-celled detention/wetpond that will be constructed within a storm drainage tract in the Southwest corner of the site. The tract will be deeded to the Homeowners Association, and all maintenance will be the responsibility of the Homeowners Association. All storm drainage control facilities will be designed according to the 1998 King County Surface Water. Design Manual. The pond outfall will be connected to the Maplewood Estates storm drainage system. The lots will be served by interior access roads as well as access easements, all of which will be designed and built to the City of Renton standards. We are proposing to reduce the right-of-way width for the internal access roads to 42 feet. Per City of Renton Development Regulations Section 4-6-060 R.3, Reduced Right-of-Way Dedication, this reduction allows the creation of additional lots within the shape and size constraints of the site. Landscaping for the individual lots will be installed by the homebuyer and will consist of both informal and formal plantings. Access to the internal road will-be from NE 4th Street and the Maplewood subdivision. All design and construction for the improvements both on and off site, will be to the City of Renton standards. The estimated construction cost for the improved lots is $500,000, with fair market value at approximately $1,235,000. Only the public street right-of-way is intended to be dedicated to the City of Renton. og 1(s11dA1� ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLLSCT.DFQFNT.P ` INTRODUCTION ( u�9Zi-rn''''L:'C':313ental Purpose of Checklist: u �The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requiresall agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: (A nonproject proposal includes plans, policies and programs where actions are different or broader than a single site-specific proposal) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply". IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the word "project", "applicant", and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer", and "affected geographic area," respectively. IF YOU NEED ASSISTANCE IN COMPLETING THE CHECKLIST OR HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS, PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFICE OF COORDINATION AT 453-2971, OR VISIT OUR OFFICE ON THE SECOND FLOOR, CITY HALL, 11511 MAIN STREET, BELLEVUE. 0005OvSEPA{ll.dec; 10/31.00: Page: 1 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Amberwood Preliminary Plat 2. Name of applicant: Steven Beck 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant: Contact Person: Steven Beck Lafe B. Hermansen Amberwood L.L.C. do Core Design, Inc. 19129 S.E. 145th Street 4205 - 148th Ave. N.E., Suite 200 Renton, WA 98059 Bellevue, WA 98007 (253) 770-8100 (425) 885-7877 4. Date checklist prepared: October 23,2000 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton Department of Planning, Building, Public Works 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction is proposed to start in Spring 2002 subject to the approval process. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Not at this time. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Geotechnical Report by Terra Associates, Inc. (September 15, 2000) 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None to our knowledge. 00059t S t':3{)1 oc; i O $1 00; Page: 2 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Construction Plan Approval Final Plat Approval Building Permits Grading Permits Other Customary Permits 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) This application proposes a 19 lot preliminary plat on a 4.2-acre site under the existing requirements for an R-5 zone. The homes are anticipated to be in the middle income price range. Construction of the site will result in ±90% of the property being developed. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project address is 6001 NE 4th Street and is located in the NW 1/4, Section 14, Township 23N, Range 5E. The site is just to the west of the intersection of 156th Avenue SE and NE 4th Street, located on the south side of NE 4th Street. A legal description and vicinity map is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 00059v3. .PA0I.doe; I O;_31;00; Page:3 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous other The site is generally flat, sloping to the southwest corner at approximately 5%. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The steepest slope is approximately 15% in the Southwest corner of the property. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. According to the soil survey by Terra Associates, September 2000, the site is almost entirely underlain by Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam, 0 to 6 percent slope: d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None to our knowledge. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The purpose of the grading is to construct the proposed public streets to City standards and to provide building pads and utility locations for single family residences. The grading is intended to be balanced onsite, with all cut and fill material originating from within the site, with the total of±7,500 cubic yards. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Erosion could occur as a result of denuded soil during and immediately following storm events. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 49% will be covered by impervious surface. 00059vSEPAO 1.doe; 10/31100: Page:4 • h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: A temporary erosion and sedimentation control (TESCP) plan will be prepared and implemented prior to commencement of construction activities. During construction erosion control measures may include any of the following: siltation fence, temporary siltation ponds and other measures which may be used in accordance with requirements of the City. At completion of the project, permanent measures will include stormwater runoff detention and water quality facilities as required. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During construction, there will be increased exhaust and dust particle emissions. After construction, the principle source of emissions will be from automobile traffic, lawn equipment, and others typical of a residential neighborhood. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Off-site sources of emissions or odors are those typical of residential neighborhoods that surround this site, such as automobile emissions from traffic on adjacent roadways and fireplace emissions from nearby homes. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Construction impacts will not be significant and can be controlled by several methods: watering or using dust suppressants on areas of exposed soils, washing truck wheels before leaving the site, and maintaining gravel construction entrances. Automobile and fireplace emission standards are regulated by the State of Washington. The site has been included in a "No Burn Zone" by the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency which went into effect on September 1, 1992. No land clearing or residential yard debris fires would be permitted on-site, nor in the surrounding neighborhood in accordance with the regulation. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. There are no water bodies associated with this property. We are aware of wetland and intermittent streams that are associated with the Maplewood Estates project to the west and the south of the subject property. 00059vS.EPA()I.doe; I0131/'00: Page: 5 2) Will'the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) of the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. We are aware of the wetlands that are associated with the Maplewood Estates project to the west and the south of the subject property. The Maplewood Estates project shows one wetland with a 25 foot buffer located approximately 105 feet from the south property line of this project. Our construction is not anticipated to impact the waters contained within Maplewood Estates. We are unaware of any other waters within 200 feet of our project. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Not applicable. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. There will be no surface water withdrawals or diversions. Please refer to the preliminary drainage plan. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No, a public sanitary sewer system will be installed to serve the future homes. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No groundwater will be withdrawn, public water mains will be installed as part of the plat construction. No water will be discharged to groundwater except through the incidental infiltration of stormwater. 00059vSEPAOI.doc; I0/31/00: Page: 6 . II • 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage: industrial, containing the following chemicals....; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. The site will be served by sanitary sewers. There will be no waste material discharged to the ground from the development. Post-development stormwater runoff from roadways and home sites will be collected within drainage facilities which will settle out and/or separate automobile petroleum and other household waste materials to acceptable levels, then tightlined to the stormwater system proposed for Maplewood Estates. Requirements for water quality and runoff rate control will be met. c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) . Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Stormwater runoff will result from roadways and other impervious surfaces and will be collected and routed to the detention facility located on-site, treated for sediment and petroleum removal, then routed through a detention/wet pond. Requirements for water quality, and runoff rate control will be met. Outflow from this system will be connected to the Maplewood Estates storm system. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. This would be very unlikely. The only materials that could enter ground or surface waters would be those associated with automobile discharges and yard and garden preparations. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: A City approved storm drainage system will be designed and implemented in order to mitigate any adverse impacts from stormwater runoff. The system will include temporary erosion control barriers during site construction, and permanent stormwater collection/treatment facilities soon after beginning site development construction. This permanent system will ensure that•prior to the release of stormwater into the downstream storm system, the system will have significantly reduced the potential impacts to ground and surface waters. 00059vSEPA{li.doe; I0 31/00: Page:7 • b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? The main source of off-site noise in this area originates from the vehicular traffic present on NE 4th Street. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term noise impacts will result from the use of construction and building equipment during site development and home construction. These temporary activities will be limited to normal working hours. Long-term impacts will be those associated with the increase of human population; additional traffic and noise associated with residential areas will occur in the area. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Building construction will be done during daytime hours. Construction equipment will be equipped with muffler devices and idling time should be kept at a minimum. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site currently contains one house and associated outbuildings. All structures currently on the site will be removed. The current use of the adjacent properties is as follows; North: - SE 4th Street, undeveloped land South: - Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat. East: - Single-family residence. West: - Maplewood Estates Preliminary Plat. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not to our knowledge. c. Describe any structures on the site. There is currently one single family residence on the site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? The single family residence which is on the site will be removed. 00049v sEPAO i.doc; I0$1;00; Page: 10 e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The current zoning is R-5. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The current comprehensive plan designation is Residential Rural. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approximately 47.5 people (19 x 2.5 persons per dwelling unit). j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Approximately 2.5 people (1 x 2.5 persons per dwelling unit). k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None proposed because the current property owner is a proponent of the redevelopment of the property. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The area around the site consists of residential housing. This use is compatible with surrounding uses both existing and proposed. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. The preliminary plat contains 19 single-family residences. The homes are anticipated to be in the middle income price range b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. 1 single-family residence will be eliminated. This home is in the middle-income price range. • 000591 SEi'At}I.dec; I 0131 00; Page: 1 I c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None proposed because the current property owner is a proponent of the redevelopment of the property. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The buildings will meet the height requirements of the R-5 zone and will not exceed 2 stories or 30 ft. The exterior building materials may include any of the following; wood, hardwood, masonry, cedar shakes and/or asphalt shingles. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Because of the surrounding development, the visual impact on the adjacent area will be minimal. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The homes will be of a scale and size to be compatible with the existing neighborhoods. Landscaping will be installed by the future residents to provide an additional visual buffer. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will, the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur. Light and glare will originate from building lighting and exterior lighting. Light will also be produced from vehicles using the site. These impacts would occur primarily in the evening and before dawn. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? The only offsite source of light and glare are from vehicles and street lighting from the adjacent streets and the single-family neighborhoods. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Street lighting, when deemed necessary, will be installed in a manner that directs the lighting downward. !00059vS1;i A01.doe; l0131:0i0: Page: 1 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Maplewood Park (located on 144th Ave. SE), Maplewood Golf Course, and Cedar River Regional'Park (located on the Renton Maple Valley Road) are in proximity to the site. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If.so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreational opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any? Impacts will be mitigated through participation in the City's park mitigation program. The required mitigation fee will be paid prior to recording the subdivision. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None, there are no known impacts. If an archeological site is found during the course of construction, the State historical Preservation Officer will be notified. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Access will be off NE 4th Street from the north side of the site. Access will also be obtained through a connection with Maplewood Estates (SE 128th PL), which will occur on the western side of the site. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No. The nearest transit stop is .55 miles to the west at the cross roads of Union Ave. NE and NE 4th Street. 000S96E1'A{)1.doe; I0131-00; Page: 13 r c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Four parking spaces will be provided in association with each home; a total of 76 spaces will be provided on the site. The spaces will be located in garages and on the driveways. There are no parking spaces eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). One new internal public street will provide access to the single-family lots. 6 homes will gain access to their homes via an access easement. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. The project will generate approximately 182 trips per day. Peak volumes will occur between 4 to 6 p.m. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Transportation impacts will be mitigated through participation in the city's traffic mitigation program. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The need for public service such as fire, health, and police protection will be typical of single family development of this size. The school children originating from the homes in this development will attend the schools in the Renton School District. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. The roads and homes will be constructed to meet all applicable standards and codes of the City and the Uniform Building Code. Access to the homes will be obtained from public streets and access easements. The proposed development will contribute to the local tax base and provide additional tax revenue for the various public services. The impact to the schools will be mitigated through the payment to school impact fees. 00059v E!).\t)i.cic�('; 101;.1100: Page: 14 16. Utilities a. Underline utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. All utilities are available to the site through the proper extension of services. Extension of services is the developers' responsibility. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity will be provided by Puget Sound Energy. Natural Gas will be provided by Puget Sound Energy. Water Service will be provided by King County District 90. Sanitary Sewer will be provided by the City of Renton. Telephone Service will be provided by Verizon. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: November 6, 2000 f . Hermansen 000sorsTPAOl.doc; 10 3 t/00; Page: 15 CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION DESCRIPTION 'tr • AMBERWOOD, CORE #00059r ��` `', •� _1 c:ate^9 + u PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION DATES u. Grading will start Spring of 2002. The road and utilities will start shortly thereafter with home construction to follow. H. HOURS OF OPERATION 7:00 am to 6:00 pm—Monday through Friday III. PROPOSED HAULING/TRANSPORTATION ROUTES All equipment,materials and laborers will enter the site off of NE 4th Street. IV. MEASURES TO BE IMPLEMENTED TO MINIMIZE DUST,FRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS,MUD,NOISE AND OTHER NOXIOUS CHARACTERISTICS. • Dust Best management practices will be used to minimize dust on the project site. Water trucks or metered fire hoses will be used as needed to wet down the areas used by construction equipment. Disturbed slopes will be hydroseeded per the Erosion/Sedimentation Control Plan to control dust.- ♦ Traffic During site infrastructure and home construction,the traffic entering and leaving the site will consist of subcontractors and deliveries. When arriving for work,the subcontractors will be traveling opposite the traffic on NE 4th Street,and materials are primarily delivered at off peak hours during the day. None of these operations are anticipated to have a significant impact on the peak or non-peak hour in the area. • Transportation Impacts Access for construction of the project will be located on NE 4th Street,but as stated above will not have a significant impact on traffic. The construction of the entrance and of the internal road and the extension of the utilities to the project may require some construction in the proposed NE 4th Street right-of-way. This work will be performed during non-peak hours and lane channelization will be used if needed. • Mud In keeping with state law,any vehicle with deposits of mud,etc.on the vehicle's body, (fender,undercarriage,wheels or tires)will be cleaned of such material before the operation of the vehicle on a paved public highway. In addition a street sweeper will also be used as necessary to remove any deposits from the roadways. • Noise All Construction equipment will have approved mufflers. Impacts from noise are expected to be minimal. The hours of operation will be 7:00 am to 6:00 pm. I:\2000\00059\Docs\00059 const mitigation.doc 10/31/00 .. . .... .........Cf.TY...O. .. ........ .. ..,._....,..•...:.........._.......,......_........I::r.-:!:aia`:::��:i�:i�"!!:ii!:u::!:i!:'::::':^�::�.._.::::.:.:•:!:.r:.:..:.:'!:i:::.::;!:.:::::!::::i!!:�_....,..::!.:_...::__::�:--.;n....:':-�'i�c.;.y,.,,..;»::�i::-:.::_:::::::.:c:;.:::::.:?:::.,!:.,:;s:i!!::x:..:':__..::,!!:!!!�''::5-:':::�!i!i�!-::: �:-!!::::;i:::n�i':!e:i_�_!i!i ii:l:!!:::_::-!-: :::-... ........._>•::`-.Ir:I:i::.::::::::::::::us:.,!::.r.._:::x:..:u....x::..:......-:::�._u_. ,...........x.s....._...r::::,::::�:::::,.:..:_::.!:::::!:a!: - ... ..._ .......r.............................................r............_.......,.,_.r: ..... ..... .... ...... ... ... .. ... ...r.. .3», ..... .. ._. _ .::: ... ..... ...... .: . ... �:.. r r fir;° .....: :_,?� .,v:!:..,::.r.._...... .»�.x�::=:=`:!.:::.r,*.:,;. !: :! .. ,: .�,: :: I!::. _ _ _ _ �� ]:�:':"!Y!i�i!!i!:4!3_::-,i!c!::::::r._S:_i:_:_�1:?:`v-:::�:�. ..=. .....::.c.-.._:::»,::.:»_:_,_:::::::::::::_r::�-:_::.._ ::::.. . .... A:'_ w ' _ — , yx j ,/�f._FID�4IEIT_0� 1NSfiA�I.AI� �N. _ . .......... ................r............................,.. .... ..,..x .. .. .. ........ .... ..r .. .. ... ... ,. .... .... ......_..._..v,.,.. ..._.......�_,_- . ::: ::.»: .: ::z:..x :: ._.,. .. .. . F P BLIC_I_I.NFO;t�MA TI:QxI�::,�5 I;GAN_ "`ir:"u,:::.-:_c.:`x�vx:v::.::-:-::...a...,;, _...._._.vx::�::r.::v:_m.;:!im::Ci::_:i:'va:_:�r:':•�:•-=:::x::�:::::::::v_,:u:.:a-a_:::r.: -- _- __ _ _ ___ - - — - -_ _ __ -- _ -- -- -- - __• vr._ ._.....__-_:..:: STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING ) S/7-e/Abli � �JE� , being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: 1. On the 7 day of 11L®V ,20 00 , I installed V public information si n(s)and plastic flye box oe property located at 9O f � , '11 n, ti— fdr the following project: RENg-om w . litthW/A`-e-Yr, Project name - `7f1uid ot,eosntJ Owner Name 2. I have attached a copy of the neighborhood detail map marked with an."X'to indicate the location of the installed sign. 3. This/these public information sign(s)was/were constructed and installed in locations in conformance with the requirements of Ch p r 7 Title 4 of Rento Muni ipal Code. nstaller Signature SUBSCRIBE QRN to before me this `ern day of (JOVEfl1 ,20 Co 11)11, °°°° :o '74RY •: 13a m. e NOTARY PUBLI in and for the State of Washington, ' •• �BLIC • ;residing at • �°°9 ••:�s-o'`,••'� e Mycommission expires on �-1S—O � f •,�,�;qt .....• PPUS.50S.DOC 11��\w/�SM�_RE y 12 oI d►aLLs �►aZL 4y ol4L 9 1 G 1 41h! . • 4y 44t4 L Q2:I1 f I &lCAl �¢ZL ' �� �j49L �y),ygL 1 . x i I.L114 i4 i i.1 j ;I 1. PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, INC. 215 Columbia Street . �._= Seattle, Washington 98104-1511 • Senior Title Officer,. Mike Sharkey (mikesharkey@pnwt.com) Assistant Title Officer, Curtis Goodman (curtisgoodmanc�pnwt.com) Senior Title Technician, Linda Lamson (lindalamson@pnwt.com) Unit No. 12 FAX No. (206) 343-1330 Telephone Number (206) 43-1327 • Main Street Escrow 2708 East Main Avenue, #203 Title Order Na. : 404131 Puyallup, WA 98371 - Attention: Angie Your Ref. : 00-0115 A. L. T. A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Effective Date: April 24, 2000, at 8 :00 a.m. 1. Policy(ies) to be issued: • ALTA Owner'•s Policy Amount $ 650, 000 .00 • Standard (X) Extended ( ) Premium • r 1,190.00 Tax (8.6W) 102.34 HOMEOWNER'S RATE (30.% DISCOUNT) Proposed Insured: • STEVEN A. BECK, a married man as his separate estate, and/or assigns NOTE: IF EXTENDED COVERAGE FOR OWNERS OR LENDERS WIL]4, BE REQUIRED FOR A PENDING TRANSACTION, PLEASE NOTIFY US AT LEAST ONE WEEK PRIOR TO CLOSING SO THAT WE MAY INSPECT THE PREMISES. 2 . The Estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this commitment is fee simple_ 3 . The estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of Commitment vested in: • DAVID E. JOHNSON and NANCY J. JOHNSON, husband and wife 4 . The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the County of King, State of Washington, and described• as follows : As on Schedule A, page 2, attached. Order No. 404131 A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Page 2 The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the county of King, State of Washington, and described as follows: The east half of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 14, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington; EXCEPT the north 42 feet thereof conveyed to King Coun:y for road purposes by deed recorded under Recording Number 5790506; EXCEPT the east 30 feet for said road. END OF SCHEDULE A • NOTE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04 . Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description within the. body of the document. NWNW 14-23-05 PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, INC. • A.L.T.A COMMITMENT Schedule B Order No. 40413 ,. I. The following are the requirements to be complied with: A. Instruments necessary to create the estate or interest to be insured must be properly executed, delivered and duly filed for record. B. Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest: to be insured. II. Schedule B of the Policy or Policies to be issued (as set forth in Schedule A) will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company.: A. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed Insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. B. GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2 . Public or private easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public record. 3.. Encroachments', overlaps, boundary line disputes, or other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey or inspection of the premises. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records, or Liens under the Workmen's Compensation Act not shown by the public records . 5. Any title or rights asserted by anyone including but not limited to persons, corporations, governments or other entities, to tide lands, or lands comprising the shores or bottoms of navigable rivers, lakes, bays, ocean •sr sound, or lands beyond the line of the harbor lines as estkblished or changed by the United States Government. • 6. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water.. 7. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance, capacity, or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity or garbage removal. 8. General taxes not now payable or matters relating to • special assessments and special levies, if any, preceding the same becoming a lien. 9. Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including, but not limited to, easements or equitable servitudes. C. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: As on Schedule B, attached. • Order No. 404131 A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B • Page 2 , SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: NOTE FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY: • EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1997, AND PURSUANT TO AMENDMENT OF WASHINGTON STATE STATUTES RELATING TO STANDARDIZATION OF RECORDED DOCUMENTS, THE FOLLOWING FORMAT AND CONTENT REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET. FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF THE DOCUMENT BY THE RECORDER. FORMAT: MARGINS TO BE 3" ON TOP OF FIRST PAGE, 1" ON SIDES AND BOTTOM - 1" ON TOP, SIDES AND BOTTOM OF EACH SUCCEEDING PAGE. RETURN ADDRESS IS • ONLY ITEM ALLOWED WITHIN SAID 3" MARGIN. NOTHING WITHIN 1" MARGINS. FONT SIZE OF 8 POINTS OR LARGER AND PAPER SIZE OF NO MORE THAN 8 1/2" BY 14" . NO ATTACHMENTS ON PAGES SUCH AS STAPLED OR TAPED NOTARY SEALS; PRESSURE SEALS MUST BE SMUDGED. INFORMATION WHICH MUST APPEAR ON THE FIRST PAGE: RETURN ADDRESS, WHICH MAY APPEAR WITHIN THE UPPER LEFT HAND 3" MARGIN. TITLE OR TITLES OF DOCUMENT. IF ASSIGNMENT OR RECONVEYANCE, REFERENCE TO RECORDING. NUMBER OF SUBJECT DEED'' OF TRUST. NAMES OF GRANTOR(S) AND GRANTEE(S) WITH REFERENCE TO ADDITIONAL NAMES ON FOLLOWING PAGES, IF ANY. ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION (LOT, BLOCK, PLAT NAME, OR SECTION, TOWNSHIP, RANGE AND QUARTER QUARTER SECTION FOR UNPLA'TTED) . ASSESSOR'S TAX PARCEL NUMBER(S) . (continued) • Order No. 404131 A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B Page 3 • SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS (continued) : 1. CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 4612 AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: • RECORDED: June 21, 1996 RECORDING NUMBER: 9606210966 . • 2. CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 4760 AND THE TERMS AND CONDITION THEREOF: RECORDED: April 20, 1999 RECORDING NUMBER: 9904202769_ 3. RIGHT TO MAKE NECESSARY SLOPES FOR CUTS OR FILLS UPON PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED AS GRANTED IN PEED: RECORDED: September "24, 1964 RECORDING NUMBER: 5790506 GRANTEE: County of King 4. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES: FIRST HALF DELINQUENT MAY 1, IF UNPAID: SECOND HALF DELINQUENT NOVEMBER 1, IF UNPAID: • YEAR: 2000 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 142305-9020-09 LEVY CODE: 6867 CURRENT ASSESSED VALUE: Land: $132, 000.00 Improvements: $115,000.00 GENERAL TAXES: AMOUNT BILLED: $3,421.18 AMOUNT PAID: $ 0.00 AMOUNT DUE: $3,421.18 • • (continued) • Order No. 404131 A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B Page 4 • SPECIAL DISTRICT: AMOUNT BILLED: • $70.12 • AMOUNT PAID: $ 0.00 AMOUNT DUE: $70.12 SPECIAL DISTRICT: AMOUNT BILLED: $14.90 AMOUNT PAID: $ 0.00 AMOUNT DUE: $14.90 • SPECIAL DISTRICT: - AMOUNT BILLED: $1.30 • AMOUNT PAID: $0.00 AMOUNT DUE: $1.30 SPECIAL DISTRICT: AMOUNT BILLED: $5.00 • AMOUNT PAID: $0.00 AMOUNT DUE: $5.00 • 5. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: . David E. Johnson, who =squired title as David Eugene Johnson., and Nancy C. Johnson, husband anal. wife TRUSTEE: Pacific Northwest Title Company, a Washington corporation BENEFICIARY: Washington Mutual Bank AMOUNT: $155, 000.00 DATED: January 31, 2000 RECORDED: February 7, 2000 RECORDING NUMBER: 20000207001444 The amount•now secured by said Deed of Trust and the terms upon which the same can be discharged or assumed should be ascertained from the holder of the indebtedness secured. • (continued) / • Order No. 404131 A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B Page 5 • 6. Title is to vest in Steven A. Beck, and will then be subject to: :t . LIEN: CLAIMED BY THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, DEPARTMENT OF: Social and Health Serv .ces AGAINST: Steven A. Beck IN AMOUNT OF: • $11,441.85 (and interest) RECORDED: January 13, 1993 RECORDING NUMBER: 9301131115 NOTE: The lien of said judgment depends upon the identity of the • judgment debtor with Steven A. Beck. b. JUDGMENT: AGAINST: Steven Beck IN FAVOR OF: State of Washington AMOUNT: $500.00, plus interest and/or costs if any WARNING: THIS AMOUNT IS NOT TO BE USED AS A BASIS FOR. CLOSING ANY SALE OR LOAN TRANSACTION. THE AMOUNT NOW OWING AND THE REQUIREMENTS TO OBTAIN A SATISFACTION OR RELEASE OF SAID JUDGMENT MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE JUDGMENT CREDITOR OR HIS ATTORNEY. ENTERED: October 28, 1996 KING COUNTY JUDGMENT NUMBER: 96-9-26652-9 SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER: 96-1-06780-2 ATTORNEY FOR JUDGMENT CREDITOR: D. O'Leary, DPA NOTE: The lien of said judgment depends upon the identity of the judgment debtor with Steven A. Beck. • c. NOTICE OF FEDERAL TAX LIEN; AGAINST: Steven and Nellie F. Beck IN AMOUNT OF: $14, 061.77 (and interest) RECORDED: December 15, 1997 • RECORDING NUMBER: 9712150325 NOTE: The lien of said judgment depends upon the identity of the judgment debtor with Steven A. Beck. • (continued) Order No. 404131 A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B Page 6 d. QUESTION OF THE EXISTENCE OF AN "AUTOMATIC HOMESTEAD" : • If the subject property is, or will be, the residence of a marital community, even though the interest therein may be intended to be the separate property of either spouse, execution of the proposed encumbrance, conveyance or contract to convey must be by both husband and wife, pursuant to R.C.W. 6.13, which provides for an "automatic homestead", and R.C.W. 26.16.030'. e. Matters which may be disclosed by a search of the records against the name of the spouse of Steven A. Beck, if married. 7. LIEN: - CLAIMED BY THE STATE OF • WASHINGTON, DEPARTMENT OF: Social and Health Services AGAINST: . David E. Johnson IN AMOUNT OF: $100, 551.90 (and interest) RECORDED: February 23, 2000 RECORDING NUMBER: 20000223001939 NOTE: The lien of said judgment depends upon the identity of the judgment debtor with David E. Johnson. 8. Payment of Real Estate Excise Tax, if required. The property described herein is situated within the boundaries of local taxing authority of unincorporated King County. Present Rate of Real Estate Excise Tax as of the date herein is 1.78%. NOTE: Upon notification of cancellation, there will be a minimum cancellation fee of $50.00 plus tax of $4.30. END OF SCHEDULE B Title to this property was examined by: Jeff Olsen Any inquires should be directed to one of the title officers set forth in Schedule A. CC: Northwest Brokers-Puyallup/Steven Beck Landman, Inc. -Renton/Chris Johnson dh ry PACIFIC NORTHWEST T[n.E Company of W hingmn.Inc. TO: Main Street Escrow 215 Columbia Street 2708 East Main Avenue, #203 Seattle,Washington Puyallup, WA 98371 98104 Attn: Angie Ref.# 00-0115 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT #1 cc: Northwest Brokers PNWT Order Number: 404131 2708 East Main Avenue Seller: Johnson ' Puyallup, Washington 98371 Buyer/Borrower: Beck Attn: Steven Beck cc: Landman, Inc. 12515 142nd Avenue SE Renton, Washington 98059 Attn: Chris Johnson The following matters affect the property covered by this order: • The following paragraphs (s) of our preliminary commitment has/have been eliminated: 6a, 6b, 6c, 6d and 7 • The following has been added as paragraph 9: 9. LATECOMERS AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BY AND BETWEEN: City of Renton and Centex Homes DATED: April 7, 2000 RECORDED: April 20, 2000 RECORDING NUMBER: 20000420000998 REGARDING: Wastewater systems and appurtenances and latecomer connection fees. Please note the property herein described is listed as Parcel 40. • Except as to the matters reported hereinabove, the title to the property covered by this order has NOT been re-examined Dated as of May 17, 2000 at 8:00 a.m. PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY By: Mike Sharkey Title Officer KM Phone Number: 206-343-1327 • PACIFIC klarmwE,S`r MILE G.mpwy ofN hhingmn.lnc. TO: Main Street Escrow 215 Columbia Street 2708 East Main Avenue, #203 Seattle,Washington Puyallup, WA 98371 98104 • Attn: Angie Ref.# 00-0115 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT #2 cc: Northwest Brokers PNWT Order Number: 404131 2708 East Main Avenue Seller: Johnson Puyallup, Washington 98371 Buyer/Borrower: Beck Attn: Steven Beck cc: Landman, Inc. 12515 142nd Avenue SE Renton, Washington 98059 Attn: Chris Johnson The following matters affect the property covered by this order: • The following paragraphs (s) of our preliminary commitment has/have been eliminated: 6e' • The following paragraph has been amended to read as follows: 4. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES: FIRST HALF DELINQUENT MAY 1, IF UNPAID: SECOND HALF DELINQUENT NOVEMBER 1, IF UNPAID: YEAR: 2000 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 142305-9020-09 LEVY CODE: 6867 CURRENT ASSESSED VALUE: Land: $132,000.00 Improvements: $115,000.00 GENERAL TAXES: AMOUNT BILLED: $3,421.18 AMOUNT PAID: $1, 710.59 AMOUNT DUE: $1, 710.59 SPECIAL DISTRICT: • AMOUNT BILLED: $70.12 AMOUNT PAID: $35.06 AMOUNT DUE: $35.06 SPECIAL DISTRICT: --Supplemental Title Report Page 2 Order No. : 404131 AMOUNT BILLED: $14.90 AMOUNT PAID: $ 7.45 AMOUNT DUE: $ 7.45 SPECIAL DISTRICT: AMOUNT BILLED: $1.30 AMOUNT PAID: $0.65 AMOUNT DUE: $0.65 SPECIAL DISTRICT: AMOUNT BILLED: $5.00 AMOUNT PAID: $2.50 AMOUNT DUE: $2.50 • • Except as to the matters reported hereinabove, the title to the property covered by this order has NOT been re-examined Dated as of May 18, 2000 at 8:00 a.m. PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY By: Mike Sharkey Title Officer Phone Number: 206-343-1327 cg } 000_AL PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE Company nrWa.hin�mn Inc.-- TO: Main Street Escrow 215 Columbia Street 2708 East Main Avenue, #203 Seattle,Washington Puyallup, WA 98371 98104 Attn: Angie Ref.# 00-0115 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT #3 4/cc: Northwest Brokers PNWT Order Number: 404131 2708 East Main Avenue Seller: Johnson Puyallup, Washington 98371 Buyer/Borrower: Beck Attn: Steven Beck cc: Landman, Inc. - 12515 142nd Avenue SE Renton, Washington 98059 Attn: Chris Johnson The following matters affect the property covered by this order: The following has been added as paragraph 10: 10. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: David E Johnson and Nancy J Johnson, husband and wife TRUSTEE: Pacific Northwest Title BENEFICIARY: Washington Mutual Bank AMOUNT: $15, 000.00 DATED: July 17, 2000 RECORDED: July 24, 2000 RECORDING NUMBER: 20000724000624 The amount now secured by said Deed of Trust and the terms upon which the same can be discharged or assumed should be ascertained from the holder of the indebtedness secured. (continued) ) SUPPLEMENTAL TITLE REPORT Page 2 Order No. 404131 • Except as to the matters reported hereinabove, the title to the property covered by this order has NOT been re-examined Dated as of July 27, 2000 at 8:00 a.m. PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY By: Mike Sharkey Title Officer Phone Number: 206-343-1327 rtl RECEIVED j APR 2 7 2000 :�:��4Tib�TRATEGRC p!�jg0.S, NNING • MEMORANDUM. U Cvy} ,ra,• C`3ur) DATE: '� 00 �`��' TO: Long Range Planning ':` - �J FROM: Jana Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: ,42& ica^,L /b `a/G' LOCATION: 2f7/ PREAPP NO. 0D - 57 Please review the attached preliminary project plans for consistency with applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies. Please submit your written comments to no later than . Thank you. We will not be able to include comments received after this date in the presentation/summary we prepare for the applicant. 6)76 1 S,'.0 iAA' c,r'YO >24 i Pt:7v-71 r a-U 2f 1 YV -7I-t C` Co)", C -eh,s v C; P ,-J-rJo (-5... .. p��cucr�Itic-. 03rtmiher or Ti-r-z a,A.117-oF c:/ity iiyzak peon"-, AN �73- irev4 /C o F iF}% ft-ePerra-S c 1 7 20 ury)75 [-JoV; 9 13G p'll A.%1"wr-t >7i;Yv51- i i-}�W�v�2� T S1Z�� mill' rt,'< r?EUD (i u,vrz5 . O & O)N& ol'i k4- U ( 1-e7rs- VCV,L) rz.63 f�0 P0(.A.G'`' (SS u ts3 s ue12J}2 1 L.Pt.697:vru;rv-k. preapp 327 • -- f 3S r ,, . • • 1 -- Izt° 1 2 3 `+ i ! 1 ( tort 2 , Iq2 ' . . . . H , ' � I SD It f: r i 1 ' 64s l• • . • ^-i t i l -.5 . R... $l . i .... rl yb -— —-fi 14Cm_ — — — 1l.4- - . c5. . • .1 • f i . 5 ' { 4f1 1J )G•5 t7 • .,....,, i. i ` _ 1 • I . �'�` . 33 544 J f • j �- ' `.. c, i7 I..Tr EAMON MEMORANDUM - DATE: *7/40 TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, Project Planner FROM: Jana Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: 2i z)2Od pew Avke, LOCATION: 69Y Ng 4-i-in 67. PREAPP NO. 0 0 -5Z A meeting with the applicant has been scheduled for '6/: X A7f4 , Thursday, IU/76 1dr , in one of the 6th floor conference rooms (new City Hall). If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED .PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11:00 AM meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. Please submit your written comments to ��i -6e at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. . • /44) 6,144,44.4,6t4:4 AtA61 n4e /elf . W; 7761/4j Preapp2 Uti�Y O� 4. ® 4. CITY OF RAN ON 41.. FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 'MEMORANDUM DATE: May 1, 2000 TO: Elizabeth Higgins, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal 1 A SUBJECT: Amberwood Preliminary Plat, 6001 NE 4th St. Fire Department Comments: 1. A fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single family structures. If the building square footage exceeds 3600 square feet in area, the minimum fire flow increases to 1500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structure. 2. A fire mitigation fee of$488.00 is required for all new single family structures. 3. A secondary access is required by City Ordinance. Roadway turnarounds for this size plat requires a 90 foot diameter cul-de-sac. 4. All building addresses shall be visible from the public street. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUIL ING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: MAY 12, 2000 TO: ELIZABETH HIGGINS FROM: NEIL WATTS * ' SUBJECT: PREAPPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTS AMBERWOOD PRELIMINARY PLAT We have reviewed the preapplication submittal for the proposed Amberwood Plat, located at 6001 NE 4th St, and have the following comments. WATER • This site is within the Water District 90 Service Area, and would be served by the District for water. It should be noted that there currently is no franchise agreement with the City of Renton and Water District 90 for facilities within the City limits. SEWER • There will be a series of 8" sewer mains stubbed to the westerly property line, and a new 24" sewer main in NE 4'b St. Sewer service is expected to be provided by extension of an 8" sewer main from the adjacent Maplewood Estates subdivision, currently under construction. • 8" .sewer mains must be extended into the site to.service the new parcels. No dual side sewers will be permitted. • The sewer mains must be constructed within a public right-of-way, or within an easement to the City, a minimum of 15 feet in width. • System Development Charges of$585 per house will be required at the time of construction permit issuance. Latecomer's fees will also be required for the 24" sewer main in NE 4th St adjacent to the site. Special Assessment District fees may also be required for the East Renton Interceptor. DRAINAGE • A conceptual drainage plan and drainage report will be required for the site plan application for this project. The conceptual.drainage plan shall include provisions for detention and water quality treatment in compliance with the requirements of the KCSWM. MAY 12,2000 PAGE 2 • Due to downstream flooding and erosion problems, staff.will recommend a SEPA condition requiring this project comply with the latest King County Surface Water Manual for design of both the detention and water quality improvements. • System Development Charges of$385 per house will be required at the time of construction permit issuance. • STREET IMPROVEMENTS • The conceptual plan does not address the grid street system encouraged by the City policies and codes. The proposed plat layout will not be recommended for approval by staff. The proposed layout would create a very long dead end street, with limited access for emergency vehicles. In addition to the connection shown to the new street in the Maplewood subdivision, an additional street connection will be required to NE 4th St at the easterly end of the site. A half street improvement must be provided along the east property line. This half street improvement will include 35 feet of right-of-way, 28 feet of pavement, and curb, gutter, sidewalk and lighting improvements along the west side of the street. This half street improvement shall include the dedication of half of a cul-de-sac. Per the City code, the turnaround can be provided by construction of a temporary hammerhead turnaround (see attached alternate conceptual.layout). • Full frontage improvements will be required adjacent to the development site along NE 4th St. These improvements will include curb, gutter, sidewalks, street widening, street lights, street drainage, and undergrounding of overhead utilities. • The new internal streets entirely within the plat must be developed (per City Code) to the following standards: 32 feet of pavement (minimum of 4" asphalt over 6" crushed rock), 5 foot concrete,sidewalks along both sides of the street, vertical curbs with gutters, street lighting and street drainage systems. The 42 foot right-of-ways shown on the concept plans are allowed by City Code, but additional utility easements may be needed outside of this right- of-way to accommodate the franchise utilities. • All new electrical, phone and cable services to the plat must be undergrounded. Construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by.a City of Renton public works inspector prior,to recording of the short plat. • Traffic mitigation fees of $75 per new daily trip will be required for this project. Trip generation values of 9.55 daily trips per house are typically used in calculating this mitigation fee. GENERAL • The application for the preliminary plat must include a conceptual utility plan, conceptual street improvement plan, a conceptual drainage plan and drainage report outlining detention and water quality requirements. • All required construction permits for the utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. MAY 12,2000 PAGE 3 ® Construction permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements: Water, Sewer, Storm Drainage and Street Improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the extimated construction costs; 4% of the second $100,000, and 3% of everything over $200,000. Half of this fee must be paid upon application for the construction permit, and the remainder when the permit is issued. `I I • CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: June 1, 2000 TO: Pre-Application File No. 00-52 FROM: Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner, (425)430-7382 SUBJECT: Amberwood 21-Lot Preliminary Plat Preapplication Comments Applicant: Steven A. Beck Project Name: Amberwood Preliminary Plat Project Address: 6001 NE 4th Street General: We have completed a preliminary review of the preapplication materials for the above-referenced development proposal. The following • comments on development and permitting issues are based on the. preapplication submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and on the City of Renton Codes in effect on the date of the review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers (Hearing Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Board of Adjustment, Board of Public Works, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code and the City of Renton Development Regulations. The Renton Municipal Code is available at the.City Clerk's office (7th floor City Hall), the Self- Help'Center (6th floor City Hall), and the Renton Public Library: The Development Regulations are available for purchase for $55.00, plus tax, from • the Finance Division on the first floor of Renton City Hall. Project Proposal: The applicant has proposed subdividing, by means of the Preliminary Plat process, a 4.58 acre property into 21 lots suitable for detached single family houses. The property is located in Northeast Renton on NE 4th Street between Nile Avenue NE and Rosario Avenue NE. Access would be from NE 4th Street. (The applicant should note that street names in this area were changed following annexation into the City of Renton and now conform to the City of Renton street names pattern. The applicant should verify the new street Amberwood Prelinnina1y Flat Preapplication Comments June 1, 2000 Page 2 names prior to application. All items submitted should use current street names.) • Land Use Permits Required: For subdivision of land into ten (10) or more lots, RMC 4-7-080 "Subdivision" guidelines apply. The proposed project will require Preliminary Plat and State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) approval as the first stage followed by Final Plat approval (see Final Plat Approval section below), which requires a separate application. Preliminary Plat proposals are initially reviewed by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department, then considered by the Environmental Review Committee. Following issuance of an Environmental Threshold Determination, the plat request is heard by the Hearing Examiner at a public meeting. The decision and recommendations by the Hearing Examiner are forwarded to the City Council for consideration. The City Council adopts its own findings, conclusions, and - recommendations and either approves or disapproves of the proposed plat. Application fees are $2000 for the Preliminary Plat application and $200 (1/2 of the $400 environmental review fee if the improvements are less than $100,000) or $500 (1/2 of the $1,000 fee if the improvements are more than $100,000) for Environmental (SEPA) Review. Processing time for Preliminary Plat is approximately 16 weeks, if no appeals are filed. A complete Preliminary Plat application package is being provided to the project proponent with a copy of this memorandum. • Current Land Use: The proposed project site consists of one tax parcel (#142305 9020). There is, apparently, one single family residence on the site that may be subject to demolition. There are single family homes in the vicinity of the project. The area was recently annexed into the City of Renton. Zoning: The property is located in the Residential 5 (R-5) Zone. It is designated as Residential Rural on Renton's Comprehensive Plan Land Use map. Density: In the R-5 Zone, there is no minimum density requirement. The R-5 Zone permits residential development at densities up to 5.0 dwelling units per net acre. Density calculations are based on net parcel size, excluding sensitive areas (such as wetlands and steep slope areas) and rights-of-way, and private streets serving three or more lots. In order to calculate density, the net area will need to be provided by the applicant. Amberwood Prelii. iar; . lat Preapplication Comments June 1, 2000 Page 3 • Minimum Lot Size: The minimum lot size in the R-5 Zone is 7,200 sf. It appears, from the information provided by the applicant, that this standard.would not be met on all lots. They will have to be reconfigured to meet this standard. (Site data will be required on the formal application that lists lots by number and individual lot sizes.) Minimum Lot Width and Depth: The minimum lot width, for lots 1 acre or less, is 50' for interior lots and 60' for corner lots. It appears, from the information provided by the applicant, that this standard would be met. The minimum allowable lot depth, for lots 1 acre or less, is 65'. It appears, from the information provided by the applicant, that this standard would be met. Setbacks: The minimum setbacks in the R-5 Zone, for lots 1 acre or less, are: front 15' for houses and 20' for attached garages on streets created after September 1, 1995, and 20' if fronting on existing streets rear 20' side .5' (interior lots) and 15' (corner lots) It cannot be determined from the information provided by the applicant if this standard would be met. Setback lines must be indicated by dashed lines on the site plan submitted for preliminary plat review, then removed prior to recording the final plat. Building Height: Building heights in the R-5 Zone are limited to 2 stories and 30'. It cannot be determined from the information provided by the applicant if this standard would be met. • Building Coverage: The maximum building coverage is 35% of the total lot • • • area. Building footprints are not indicated on the conceptual plan. For purpose • of considering the prelirninary.plat, building envelopes should be shown on the • . • plat map. • Parking: Off street parking must be provided for each lot, at a minimum of 2 spaces each. Access: Each lot must have access to a public street. The conceptual plan indicates that primary access will be from NE 3`d Court, with secondary access from new public streets. See comments from Fire Prevention Bureau regarding second access and turnaround and comments from Plan Review regarding street grid pattern. Amberwood Prelir,...jai lat Preapplication Comments June 1, 2000 Page 4 Sensitive Areas: The site is indicated as having sensitive slopes (25 to 40%) present. A slope analysis and geotechnical report that includes information and recommendations regarding grading and construction will be required. A traffic impact analysis will be required. Typical Environmental Mitigation measures placed on Preliminary Plats include the required Fire Mitigation Fee ($488/new lot), Parks Mitigation Fee ($530.76/new lot), and Transportation Mitigation Fee (approximately $750/new lot). These fees are required prior to recording the final plat. The site is within the Issaquah School District so impact fees would be collected by the City of Renton on behalf of the Issaquah School District for lots located north of NE 4th Street. The school fees are $2,797.00 for each new single-family dwelling. These fees are required prior to recording the final plat. Final Plat Recording: The Final Plat must conform, with only minor modifications, to the Preliminary Plat. The Final Plat cannot be recorded until the required improvements are installed and approved, and a final drawing is prepared and accepted by the City. In addition, any conditions and/or fees must be met and/or paid priorto the recording of the Final Plat as applicable. A separate application packet is required. cc: Steven A. Beck Jennifer Henning **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 11/13/00 11:15 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R0006322 Amount: 2,515 .31 11/13/00 11:15 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: AMBERWOOD #6010 Init: JEJ Project #: LUA00-150 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 142305-9020 Site Address: 6001 NE 4TH ST Total Fees: 2, 515 .31 This Payment 2, 515.31 Total ALL Pmts: 2, 515 .31 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000.345 .81.00.0007 Environmental Review 500. 00 000.345 .81.00. 0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat 2, 000. 00 000.05.519 .90.42 . 1 Postage 15 .31 • • . . rPom •... _'r 05 ;y ,r{ ... S r £ ,.. ...,.. ..� n.. .. ...r... .. .;tn ....... .. n. , n.. .. ...ten/. at':�:`: i::)tiw:': • .,.. .. ,,.c ., r..... ... .,.�.s.,.. .... ...«.. ...< . ..n tJ;,c"'«:?,.ax:..n, .».yszav • ,.:>.<,•,r :.::•�.t.n,>t3z.,.;.;k,'r<'3t. >;:..,.:::...i.::, :...........,...nr.. .,..,.».»n.....t,.,.»,.....,..v.,.ior.»,as:.....::.w<».3.cx.n_.n�.»...nnn...,......va..:.r� .n.... ::,.k,.»„ ,.,. ... ,.;w",.,.,..»x,:,:.•..n »nt:..,»:,..:..>::r'.w,>�i.:s:...kok;u:. �^:k; �. ;"'.v33�;w%:c'.wo3..:n„«n,n..»u' n ,. was .- - ." '� "�5 CST} �i1,li dG , : .....:.:.: • v`:' . . .. • . . • 'GEOTECHNICAL REPORT . i - • Amberwood • sL rk � . .- •. . � ": 6001 •NE 4th Street_ Y: • • : *Renton,:Washington . tip us. . w . '-'`:„ • rr - . : . Project No. -1 T-4725 • f.:3 • 3' 't �+t�:St ' ". m:K:.y .yf':..»Crnt n.,:;rn•uk�S' y.�;'::: 3::vwri rt:::p �yh;" .::'h�:a :rh:.,tr.- .»...:....x:. ..:...n.vro':r.uu'.:........;n.i.n::..:::.f.3, y:,w.+>.';»a; '...::..: :.;.. ..:9+:zrt .::�.r:`.... "u^x3.::... .f ...::.:. ..:::,t..::33''..tu.:y::., n..:rt:o.....:..::.:..yS't•.n .,,n�..... ........rvt:, ......n.,. .... .:. ...r.n. ..n ...:.. :. .,....., ,.:.. ., kk... .......y'..' u:5::" ,t.k.. ,>jn :, u ..,. ...r.0 ....»n•.:.:....: ... ,ki.:....., Y .:., ?.:.a .n:::.... ..r:.. :.';,..� 2:i� s'• ,. .. .,... . . rEswr. , +..,:..3:..:., � ,.., . : ......'' xtx:<w::............»w.:,........,... „x. »..w,....... ..to.... '�;.:•.;g Y:wit ..,:k:.X�3.`ar,..w.r.:yam,3r».,.<.t.,w.,...,.•..<.,».£.<ta«:.,.a>�;icwn2...,....�..w., ...»,.,»»..:.<.n..::'`,�i' sr:•,.,,.... 4 ••4 . - Terra Associates, Inc. . . .. .... .»..:..,, ..,..,.».....:.»v:.»»., ....,..,�.. ......y.,,• '.,::..r,,,,xt :.„n»w3N3:>,r..k:i^x rxraa . . • .. >. -,:.,.,'•rn..s .. �,. .�a....:.v: a..zxz. 5.,. ^3%CSz r:a•<» :, .' ., ,.;.x.,, .�. •. ,:. z.:n:.a.;..::r, Sr;:.,. .. �.: ...,. ::r'. .:<..3'....a^�Y::x::s:::.3 �y ?k:w? • t..,... :.s .... r,. .......... y..,.n.... ...Y.�: .. . �. x..>:<..::::.yr:vn:,Y :.::.3::, .r''�:'�.'�"»:.' • : ... .y.• : ..........:. ...:..n%.+.t... .. .. ..s.•, •:;a.+:S> .5.x .. .{. r .,f.,:.,..Si.....:v:X.,n..... - �;.,.��� gz3.,... � " � !< �.,rrrn:�';y`°ic: ,.n vx:4`r w� • • vi �y��yt' k • K2 3; .. - Prepared for: . ogi yrsni.: .3 Northwest Brokers -- • Bellevue• , Washington zz%'gig "R z;<k • • - ?%; • • fr`z September 15, 2000 Nrf3' .y itti-' • k • .zt. ' .a4..t emt yy,: :. .... ,. »: :.:»:. ....,;.n. .......,.w.vt:..... ;...... :.n,. /'.. .'3::¢S:r':'^' ;kl^:;:.':;St.. k>:Skrn. • C62‘ ooDE1 TERRA ASSOCIATES, Inca `'` Consultants in Geotechnical Engineering, Geology and • Environmental-Earth Sciences . • September 15,2000 ,. Project No.T-4725-1 •Mr:•Steven Beck . ... Northwest Brokers 2708 East Main Avenue • Puyallup,Washington.-98372 ._ . -. Subject: • Geotechnical Report Amberwood • -6001'NE 4th Street Renton,Washington _ , Dear Mr.Beck: As requested, we have conducted.a geotechnical engineering study for the subject site. The attached report presents our findings and recommendations for the geotechnical aspects of project design and construction. • Our field exploration indicates the site is generally underlain'byglacially-derived silty sand and sandy silt soils. hi our opinion, these soil conditions will be suitable for development of the proposed residential subdivision, provided the recommendations presented in this report are incorporated into project design and construction. • Up to approximately eight feet of uncontrolled fill is present in the southwestern corner of the site. Depending on planned development in this part of the site, overexcavation and recompaction of the soils in this part of the site may be required. We will be available to assist you with development of specific recommendations after the final project plans have been completed. We trust this information is sufficient for your current needs. If you have any questions or require additional information,please call. Sincerely yours, • TERRA ASSOCIATES,INC. Patricia Reed ,, Project Geologist G I /00 Anil Butail, P.E. 17005 Principal ` f;� OPIALV— PR/AB:dvp PERES 12J9f 01 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101, Kirkland, Washington 98034 nL- /A1G\ ul, _7777 . r , (d7 S1 R71-4'114 • terra@terra-associates.com • • • 'TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. , • 1:0 -'Project Description • - 2.0: SCope of Work 3•Q • • •, - • - : • - 2 ._ . , . • , . 3:Z• .Geology • • - 3 4 Groundwater " - 3 4.0 • - Geologic Hazards . . • 4.1 Erosion- - • 3 -Diseussion and Recommendations 4 • 5:1 General , , • 7 5.2 Site Preparation and Grading - 5 - „ • 5.4 • :Foundations' _. _ 6 • ". • -5.5 Slab-on-Grade Construction' • • • " 7 • _ Lower-Level and Retaining Walls 7 5.7 -Drainage • • 7 5.8 Utilities • _ . 8 5.9 Pavements 6.0 Additional Services 9 7.0 - Limitations • - 9 _ . Figures • Vicinity Map • Figure 1 Exploration Location Plan Figure 2 Retaining Wall Drainage Detail • • Figure 3 Typical Footing Drain Detail Figure 4 Appendix Field Exploration and Laboratory Testing Appendix A (I) • • Geotechnical Report Amberwood :; . , • 6001 NE 4th Street Renton, Washington • 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION • ::The project consists of the development of a 4.59=acre parcel located.at 6001 NE 4th Street in.Renton, .Washington: We understand that the project will consist of the construction of a.19-lot residential development. Specific design.and site grading details:were not available at the time of our study. .However, we expect-the buildings will be single-family; one-.to:two-story residences with wood-frame construction imposing relatively fight,foundation_loads. We expect structural loads:will.be approximately:20 to 40 kips per foot for isolated columns;and 1 to 2 kips per foot for continuous-bearing walls. Main floors will be constructed at grade Or framed over a crawl space. Given'the gentle-slopes on the site; we expect the'grading required to establish desired building elevations will be-moderato. l.: : - • - The recommendations in the following sections of this ;report are:based on,our understanding of the design, features. :If-actual .features vary or changes are made, we should review them in order to modify our recommendations, as required. . We should-review final design drawings and specifications to verify that our recommendations have been properly interpreted and incorporated into project design and:construction. 2:0 SCOPE OF WORK • On August 21, 2000, we excavated seven test pits to depths between three and ten feet below existing surface grades: Using the information obtained from our subsurface exploration, -we performed analyses to develop geotechnical recommendations for project. design and construction. Specifically, this report addresses the following: • Soil and groundwater conditions • Suitability of native soils for use as fill - • Site preparation and grading • Foundation support • Earth pressure parameters for basement or retaining wall design • Slab-on-grade support • Drainage • Excavations • Utilities • Pavements September 15,2000 Projectto.T-4725-1 3:0 'SITE•CONDITIONS - 3.1 Surface :The subject:site is located at 6001 NE 4th Street in Renton,Washington. The approximate location:of the site is :shown on Figure 1. The site is bounded by SE 128th Street to the north, residential structures to the east,and land under development to the west and south. There is'an existing residential.subdivision north of the site, across SE- 128th'Street::The eastern limits of the City of Renton cross the eastern.portion of the site: The site is currently residential development;with an 1;850 square foot house,garage,and a•.tall barn/garage built ;in:1967.'There are numerous.older.cars parked in the:southern portion of the site::The northern portion of the site • is:coveredbya°coniferous/broadleaf woodland:. No wetland conditions have been identified on the site. • We previewed the US "Geological Survey'(USGS) Quadrangle Map for Renton, 'Washington, dated-1949; with • photorevisions dated 1968.and 1973. .According-to the map,topographic elevations across the site range from approximately Elev. 520 inn the northeast corner to approximately.Elev. 480 in the southwest corner The current site•layout is shown on Figure 2. 3.2 Geoloev We reviewed the Geologic Map of the Renton Quadrangle, King County, Washington, by D.R. Mullineaux, dated 1965. This map shows the soils at the site as quaternary ground moraine deposits (QGT). This unit is described as mostly thin ablation till over lodgment•till.deposited by the Puget glacial lobe.. The lodgment till is generally a compact, coherent, unsorted mixture of sand, silt,.Clay, and gravel commonly known hardpan. Ablation till is similar,but much less compact and coherent. In general,-lodgnient till is 5 to.30 feet thick, and ablation till is 2 to 10 feet thick. • 3.3 Soils Topsoil Excavation of the test pits at the site revealed an approximately three-inch thick layer of topsoil overlying glacially derived units. Very Weathered Till Topsoil overlies two to three feet of silty sand and sandy silt soils. The unit is a very weathered till, generally consisting of yellowish-brown to reddish-brown silty sand with gravel, cobbles, and some roots. This material is loose to medium dense and moist to dry. Cemented Till A less weathered till material was encountered two to three feet below the surface zone. This till consists of mottled gray and brown to gray silty sand with gravel and cobbles. This material is medium dense to very dense and moist to dry. There appears to be a calcite cementation binding the till. Page No. 2 September.15,2000 Project NO-.T47254 " . The.depth to till soils in Test Pits TP-1 and TP-2 indicates that the southwestern corner of the site has been filled. . .This is:consistent- with the'surrounding topography and current site: conditions observed during our field explorations.._The fill appears to be derived from cuts in the southeastern portion of the site,and used to create a • more level surface. The fill is assumed to deepen west of Test Pit TP-1. - The fill:consists,of"light yellow to olive gray silty gravelly sand. The;fill reached depths of eight feet in Test Pit. . . TP-1 and six feet in-,Test Pit TP-2. The former surface is identified as dark brown silty sand with a wood debris . -layer underlying the fill:. The former soil horizon-was-moist to damp and overlies the:cemented till. -Test Pit TP-2 was left open for approximately one hour to observe seepage:-However,•no groundwater'seepage was observed. Detailed descriptions.of the subsurface conditions encountered are presented in Appendix A. The.approximate . -test.pit locations a're shown on Figure 2. - - '3.4 'Groundwater .. • • , • •' . We did not encounter groundwater seepage at the time•of•our recent explorations: jilowever, in November..1998 and'January 1999,'we drilled 17 test pits on• the._adjacent-properties to the south and west. At that time, groundwater was encountered to depths ranging from six inches to eight feet below existing surface grades. 'In general,'groundwater will develop in a'perched condition above:the glacial till. Fluctuations in groundwater seepage levels are expected on a seasonal and'annual basis. Typically, groundwater seepage reaches maximum levels during and :shortly following the wet winter months. .For these reasons, it is likely that perched • groundwater is present on the site during the winter months, . CO GEOLOGIC HAZARDS 4.1 Erosion ' ' - • The soils encountered on-site are classified as Alderwood gravelly sandy loam (zero to six percent slopes) by the Soil Conservation Service (SCS). These soils are nearly'level and undulating. Therefore, .in our opinion, the erosion hazard at the site is low. 4.2 Seismic The Puget Sound area falls within Seismic Zone 3, as classified by the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC). .Based on the soil conditions encountered and the local geology, from Table 16-J of the 1997 UBC, a soil'profile .type of Sc should be used for design purposes. • Page No. 3 . September 15,2000 . - Project No.T-4725-1 Liquefaction is a phenomenon where there is a reduction or complete loss of soil strength due to an increase in . water pressure induced by vibrations. Liquefaction mainly affects geologicall•y recent deposits of fine-grained sands-located below_the groundwater_ table. Soils of this nature derive their strength from intergranular'friction. The generated• water pressure or, pore pressure essentially separates the soil grains and eliminates this •Mtergranular friction;thus eliminating the soil's strength. _ r . Based'On the soil and groundwater conditions we encountered, it is.our opinion the risk of site damage due to • seismically-induced subsidence or liquefaction is minimal: . ":5;0- DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3:1. - General - - In our.opinion, development of the,siteas,proposed_is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint. :The residential .structures can.be supported on.conventional spread footings bearing_on competent native soils below the.upper 24 - -to 3.0,inches of surficial fill and topsoil Alternatively,;if required by.desired.final,building elevations, structural filll-placed and compacted_above these native soils can be used-to support building foundations.:.-Floor slabs and .pavements can be similarly supported. - . The native soils'encountered at the site contain-a significant amount of fines and will be difficult to compact as • -structural fill when too wet.- The ability to use native soil from site excavations as structural.fill will depend on its moisture content and the prevailing weather conditions at the time'of construction: 'If grading activities will take. place during the winter season,-the owner should be prepared to import free-draining granular material:for use as - structural fill and backfill. . We'reviewed a preliminary sketch of the site layout provided by Mr. Steven Beck of Northwest Brokers. The sketch indicates the construction of a stormwater retention'pond in the southwestern corner of the site. The lower till appears to slope toward the southwest. The adjoining development has created a rockery supported cut of approximately eight feet along the south and west sides of the site. Placement of a stormwater retention pond in this area will require overexcavation if the depth of the pond is less than the existing fill. It could also necessitate the placement of bentonite slurry as an impervious barrier to seepage. - Mr. Beck was on-site during the excavations and discussed construction the pond in the eastern corner of the site. This area would be less impacted by the existing fill. However,.the uncontrolled fill will remain an issue to be addressed for any development proposed in the southwest corner of the site. The pond should be lined with an impervious material, such as compacted glacial till. A residential structure may be placed in the southwestern corner of the site if the pond is constructed in the southeastern corner. However, this would require overexcavation and recompaction,or the use of deepened foundations to support the structure. We can provide detailed recommendations regarding these issues and other geotechnical design considerations for the stormwater retention pond when the final plans are provided to us. Page No. 4 • • • September 15,2000 . Project Nb. T-4725-1 • .5..2 Site Preparation and Grading To prepare the site for..construction, demolition should include+the complete removal of existing buildings from -the site.--This includes'existing utilities, .slabs,.and.foundations. According:to available records at the King • County Assessor's-Office, the house has-a septic system and.gas heat.- .Any underground storage tanks (USTs) discovered during excavation-must be removed by a licensed contractor.and disposed of in accordance with Washington State regulations. Following demolition, all vegetation,organic_surface:soils;:and.other deleterious materials should be stripped and removed from the site. In general, surface stripping depths of approximately 6-to 12 inches should be expected to remove organic topsoil. Stripped vegetation debris should be removed from the site. Organic topsoil will not be suitable for use as structural.fill. However, organic topsoil may be used for limited depths in non-structural areas or for landscaping purposes. •: - . • Once clearing and;stripping are complete, cut and-fill operations•can be made to establish desired pavement building grades..Prior to placing fill and preparing building and pavement subgrades, all exposed surfaces should • be proofrolled to determine if-any isolated_soft and yielding areas are present. Proofrolling should also be performed in cut areas that will provide direct support for new construction. 'If excessively yielding areas are observed that.cannot be stabilized by compaction, they should be cut to firm bearing and filled to grade with structural fill. If the depth of excavation to remove unstable soils is excessive, • using .a geotextile fabric, such as Mirafi 500X.or equivalent,.in conjunction with structural fill should be considered. A minimum of 18 inches of clean granular structural fill.over the geotextile fabric should establish a stable bearing surface. A representative from our Office should !observe all. proofrolling operations. We also recommend field evaluations at the time of construction to verify stable subgrades. '- The ability to use native soils from site excavations as structural fill will depend on their moisture content and the prevailing weather conditions when site grading activities take place. If grading activities are planned during the wet winter months,or if they are initiated during the summer and extend into fall and winter,the owner should be prepared to import wet weather structural fill. For this purpose, we recommend using a granular soil that meets the following grading requirements: U.S. Sieve Size Percent Passing 3 inches 100 No. 4 75 maximum No. 200 5 maximum* *Based on the 3/4-inch fraction Prior to use,Terra Associates,Inc. should examine and test all materials proposed for use as structural fill. Page No. 5 • • —• September 15,2000 Project No.T-4725-1 Structural fill should be placed in-uniform loose layers not.exceeding 12 inches and compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of•the soil's maximum dry density,:as determined by ASTM,Test Designation D-698 (Standard Proctor), The-moisture content of the soil at the time of compaction should be within two percent of its optimum, as determined by-this ASTM standard..In-non-structural areas or for backfill in utility trenches below a depth of 4 "feet,the degree'of compaction can be reduced to 90.percent. •5.3 Excavations . . _.: _ • All excavations at the site associated with confined spaces,such as utility trenches and lower building levels,must be completed in accordance with local, state, or federal requirements.:Based on current Occupational Safety and Health Administration.(OSHA)regulations,soils.on the site would be classified.as Type B soils. Accordingly,-f"or:excavations exceeding 4 feet but less-than 20 feet deep, the side:slopes should be laid back at a• minimum slope inclination of 1:1 (HorizontaL•Vertical). Alternatively, a shoring trench 'box can be used to support utility trench sidewalls. This information is provided solely.for the benefit"of the owner arid.other design consultants, and should not be "construed to imply.that Terra Associates,Inc. assumes responsibility for job site safety.- Job site safety is the sole responsibility of the project contractor. ". - 5.4 Foundations Spread Footings Residential structures may be supported on conventional spread footing foundations bearing on competent native soils or on structural fills placed,above competent 'native soils.. Foundation subgrades should be prepared as recommended in Section 5.2. Perimeter foundations should be at a minimum depth of 1.5 feet below final exterior grades. Interior foundations can be constructed at any convenient depth below the floor slab. We recommend designing foundations for a net allowable bearing capacity of 2;000 pounds per square.foot(psf). For short-term loads, such as wind and seismic, a one-third increase in this allowable bearing capacity can be used. With this bearing pressure and anticipated structural loads, we estimate total and differential settlements of approximately one inch and one-half inch, respectively. For designing foundations to resist lateral loads,,a base friction coefficient.of 0.3 can be used. Passive earth pressures acting on the sides of the footings and buried portions of the foundation stem walls can also be considered. We recommend calculating this lateral resistance using an equivalent fluid weight of 300 pounds per cubic foot (pcf). We recommend not including the upper 12 inches of soil in this computation because it can be affected by weather or disturbed by future grading activity. This -value assumes the foundations will be constructed neat against competent native soil or backfilled with structural fill, as described in Section 5.2. The values recommended include a safety factor of 1.5. Page No. 6 September 15,2000 4.. Project No.T=4725-1 • 5.5 Slab-on-Grade Construction' Slabs-on-grade may be supported on the subgrade prepared As,:recommended in Section 5.2. Immediately below the floor slabs, we:recommend placing a four-inch thick capillary break layer of.clean, free-draining sand or gravel having less than three percent-passing the No. 200:sieve. This material will reduce-the potential for upward capillary movement of water:through the underlying soil and subsequent wetting of theu#Ioor Slab. Where moisture by vapor transmission`is-undesirable,-:a durable plastic membrane should.be placed on the .;; capillary break.layer. The''inembrane should be covered with two inches of clean, moist sand to guard against damage during construction and,to aid in curing of the:.concrete. - • 5.6 `-Lower-Level:and Retaining Wins - The magnitude of earth-pressure development.on lower-level or retaining walls will depend,in-part; on the quality of wall backfill. We_:recommend.placing and_compacting wall backfill. as structural-fill. Below improved areas, such as pavements or floor'slabs,the backfill should:be'compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of its maximum dry unit weight, as determined by ASTM Test Designation D-698 (Standard Proctor). In unimproved areas, the relative compaction can be reduced to.90 percent'''. To.guard agairist'.hydroStatic pressure development, wall drainage must also be installed. A typical recommended wall drainage detail is shown on Figure 3. With wall backfill placed and compacted as recommended and drainage properly installed, we recommend designing.unrestrained walls for an active earth pressure equivalent to a fluid weighing 35 .pcf. I For.restrained walls, an additional uniform lateral pressures of-100 psf should be added. These.values assume a horizontal backfill condition and that no_other surcharge loading, such as traffic; sloping embankments, or adjacent buildings will act on the wall. • If such conditions exist, the imposed loading must be included in the wall design. Friction at the base of foundations and passive earth pressure will provide resistance to these lateral loads. Values for these parameters are provided in Section 5.4. 5.7 Drainage Surface . Final exterior grades should promote free and positive drainage away from the site at all times. Water must not be allowed to pond or collect adjacent to foundations or within the immediate building areas. We recommend providing a gradient of at least three percent for a'minimum distance of ten feet from the residential structures, except in paved locations. In paved locations, a minimum gradient of one percent should be provided unless provisions are included for collection and disposal of surface water adjacent to the structures. Page No. 7 • September 15,2000 • Project No.T-4725-1 Subsurface - • We recommend installing perimeter,foundation'drains adjacent to all structures--with main floors framed over a crawl space or.constructed at grade with an elevation equal to.of below the final exterior grade.. If the floors are constructed at grade•and:elevated above the adjacent outside grade,-the owner may elect to eliminate the foundation drains.:-.'However,-.positive drainage away from-'the structures must be established: _A.typical , recommended drain detail is shown on Figure 4:.... Subsurface'drains,must-be laid" with a ;gradient sufficient to promote positive flow to a controlled point of approved discharge: - • • • =5:8 Utilities. • ti.. Utility pipes should bebedded and backfilled in accordance with American Public Works Association(APWA)or. . King.County specifications •As a minimum;"trench backfill should:be placed and compacted as structural fill, as described in Section 5.2. As noted, soils excavated on-site-should be suitable'for use as"backfill material in dry • weather, provided the moisture content.can be controlled to facilitate proper compaction. If utility construction takes place during the winter,it will be necessary to import suitable wet:weather fill for utility trench backfilling. 5.9 Pavements Pavements should be constructed on subgrades prepared as described in Section,5.2. Regardless of the relative compaction achieved, the subgrade must-be firm and relatively unyielding before .paving. Proofroiling the -subgrade.with.heavy construction equipment should be completed to verify this condition. : • The pavement section is dependent on the supporting capability of the subgrade soils and the traffic conditions to which it will be subjected. We understand that traffic.will mainly consist of light passenger and commercial vehicles with only occasional heavy traffic in the form of moving trucks and trash removal vehicles. Based on this information, with a stable subgrade prepared as recommended, we recommend the following pavement sections: , • Two inches of asphalt concrete(AC)over six inches of crushed rock base(CRB) - . • • Two inches of AC over four inches of asphalt-treated base(ATB) The paving materials used should conform to the Washington State Department of Transportation .(WSDOT) specifications for Class B asphalt concrete, ATB,and CRB surfacing. Long-term pavement performance will depend on surface drainage. A poorly-drained pavement section will be subject to premature failure as a result of surface water infiltrating into the subgrade soils and reducing their supporting capability. To -improve performance, we recommend surface drainage gradients of at least two percent. Some longitudinal and transverse .cracking of the pavement surface should be expected over time. Regular maintenance should be planned to seal cracks when they occur. Page No. 8 • • September 15,2000 Project No.T-4725-1 6.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES -Terra Associates, Inc. should review the final design and specifications in order to verify that earthwork and. - foundation recommendations have been properly interpreted and incorporated into project design. We should also •provide geotechnical services during construction in order to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications, and recommendations. This will.allow for design changes if subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of constriction. 7.0. . LIMITATIONS •We prepared this report in accordance:with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices. This report is • the property of Terra Associates, Inc.and is intended for specific application to the Amberwood site. This report is for the exclusive use of-Northwest Brokers and their.authorized representatives. No other warranty, expressed or implied,is made:„ The analyses and recommendations-presented in this report are based on data obtained from the test pits excavated on-site. Variations in soil conditions can occur,-the nature and extent of which may not become evident until construction. If variations appear evident, Terra..Associates, Inc. should be requested to re-evaluate the recommendations in this report prior to:proceeding with construction: • • • Page No. 9 • . • ... , 4*. •. , • -. 144i • h ' 1pN 1 Qp: 2rtutHPL • COALf - '� �' sLN1•' SE. :.'; 11 '" ST Burl. Sr �I SE 112iH .alio --1 , .. 4':-'' ` ST 1�` '�; �+ 143W ' a 8500 - • S SE li2TH. ` :_•.: y..i,i$; ~LLIY H?:''..` :Q 11rd:R sfi. :e SE N11WTH d 1:I-' gQ0gy,,se ':A. . U.� I ::x�W 11 M IA �,�s >I. • i • s .1..• ',2 'SE•°t14T• H'ST.':•;�', • f5 • IR"aIH. 'l<I •.�'� .n aD '� ��• .SE.l�ni TT w .r � R J} In .• HEur .'•=. ss u4ar1JJi SE • "116TH s a <} rc 4a<<..1-.: '1-.',i u ' .I �.: . . . _ SE 11618 ST. 14800 ~• ST o�i SE 900 • . . gay • • SE 117TH ST • . .,` .:? .9 u ilsnlati - .il 3 :. • SE Hart,' •ST W 9TBST, : SE < ^' 8 . _ • Io < .•••-"' �: `SE "120TH' .`ST • .-4 - • NTS ,#�$il' .r'7TH►L '1`'SE 112isT 'ST : . SE 1zoTH - . P .,4 1122ND . LDU.FIELD. ST • ..T . ; 5E 124TH - - 'bP. ' • w Sw .w12 4`TH;-. .. `?f1E5T C+, a 1.' SE 126T .ST - - H S GNip .y .,, s -, •.,w tin ',Z4n, i: W v ::SE• i'1241 . WD '.: t ;:1; jOWOA : _.....• :•.: - -- :4 E :- =a' . P a ARK - .y ..-.: :ST:.. • ,. 7z.:SE -128TH ST ~ . ��.w 128TH $sF,r�, .3 RIDE :. - - ...... •.. 4000. " 14: 15600 Q ST . • . . < ,y • 1 SE:129TH'_ :�.. • • .,8cay t.I.. ffi •N1--' ;.., i PL �f5` N H s `� .I SY. " l} 1 • �.J j7-. • .. ST 1 .." . :K -.w - e'. < E 6 ,.k'4PARK; : . SE '1315T -:ST ©- y.... SE 1]1sr� 1.72ND • s • SE 132ND'.ST t7"-h r„� I T� SE 1. ', SE 132ND.ST SE ^132ND , �{ SSET T PL 8 < S.ST �. • • '1i�, -I p 15 . — ST • � . 0 . • • .' <- t'�r. . f SS�sTM yi €.. SE 134TH-+ ST. _ "SE 135TH ., -.' ,7sn1 . .. . - • . . .14 . ‘ 1. , e . 2 9 ' sT.. : " ii s ,. C 2ND -i�'PL�'� SE-I •' ' 1361H ST SE _ •36TH 1 ' - Mil SE '" _ ' � SE•L]Blx ` � � J 137TH PL �- � X Ann� ..: rn, E D? —vL SE 138TH .I <; SE 138TH PL rLLIBERTY I SE 138TH ST ' ., SE 1391x tt .SA. t$i SE 139TH i - .1 40 HS L. . •a ' • Si.44'49 - d%iioS4' C \.- PL • I - .to SE' 139TH PL ::§ ' SE N __J - SE 140TH A n 1 14 • SE N 1415T , 4, `14oTH PE _, I •W Y' .. L1 .SE 141ST :HAPLE110007— SE v ' E s< - I . • ST E !HEIGHTS.. ' �� a ST Z SE 142N8 ST •�I"i n ' I O y- ( < SE< 14:142ND ST - -' Q SE 142ND / i y4 n ,4 SE l4rlp Ja € SE 142N0 .ST \Ati ST i 'Y 4-8 SF `�0 �N c^g vl o g = SE R sr ur4v R .t 1^v . a„, m.. . Y,.< SE 14sro x 4 V sr wen . Q\':SE 143 Ix ST.. E ?he as z a �� 144 ‘A___-"` 5T vE a' �` �•tjD n H .SE al 144TH t P 1' �1 'ST -= .`.V4 r-\ 0 ' SE 1454 t_LZ: ✓ SE wi.0 N 15900 a.n , ' r '.;+-:.:4 _ '�, swn.ST • 444, r `' C/h N J a.+ 4 s i-'!�•.: .'e E F s4= { odd T..Y.%'� '. mil. W ..1.4_M' SF t �.,. LSE' - Sii:; vCI', n A r 3 .•t 1►1TMa g o 4 HID i ; e'a `�,:_•:� x.t .(12 '1 tee' "SE .tim fE 14TTH.ST4' �^ • o sr • ' ;:k : I'RENTN�F?:',22' n prR y \ b ;lw .- 14 • e6 9� �* to' F. _, L Jn.. a • i • REFERENCE: 'THE THOMAS GUIDE, METROPOLITAN PUGET SOUND, PAGES 626, 627, 656 AND 657, 2000 EDITION. • • • VICINITY MAP . ' ,'•: `i ` TERRA RENTON,AM OD O . WASHINGTON a. .•.,. • ASSOCIATES2000 Figure 1 Geotechnical Consultants Proj.No. 4725-1 Date SEPT. g • • • ' r . - • • ,_ Street (SE. 128th''St eet) • - --- - T----r—.— — -- _TI ... — — _ -.1 I I 1- 4 I. lit: 2 3" - - H • -I 1 f• 5. .. J I _ _—_ _ _ __—__—__ ;APPROXIMATE-SCALE 1 I 80 . - 0. i 16 . ,feet :.:.: il--.:'., T T- 1 - 1 G l t ... f 1 , 9 r 1 '1 1 1 - r I E�(. :6.. 7 8 1 G p: - - - :LE EN r,' 19 APPROXIMATE TEST:PIT. LOCATION 1 t -. 1 . , 10 1 1 FERENCE:�RE I . . ,... • � -^ L _ - trI`. .. . _ , _ . ... :> - 16 --T, _ --—-- .. , .. , ,,. .. . _ . . II :FPARCOSVIIMD IEDESB YOFC LUIN N TDAET. ED' AN D UNTIT LE D•S IT E PL.S A - ,....::,, • ., . ,-.-i - . - - _. . .▪, . . .. .‘ . _ -- . . : - . - _ , • - . 4 11 1 = : .- .1 BLC. .1' , • .. . . _ . -- ... '.:;-• :.TDHIMISE NN STITOENP• LAANNDS. :. _ . .„. . .. . „ . . . . - r i -i • •_ .. ";- l _. 1: 5 , . _ I. 12 . - I .. DSSIONSFOUNDONTHEREFERJENCED < : DRTIDOINMCNOSMIOMNOsNSWHOTUHLDFABCESIMCIOLENSS,IDAELLRED ,T. t _ . _ .- • -. 1 - ------, LOUcEATTIOONDSI SANO • ,,,.._......._, ...,....., .i..".... ."::: ,‘....:.. - . - ° TO •. APPROXIMATE. - BD B . .. _ . • • • .. . .f-.- ..... . APPROXIMATE-AREA :;::::::::::::.:_ =OF EXISTING FILL , _-_ - -_ :::f.:.:::.:::_:.:: 18 19 ..................:.......... 17:::::::::'_::::..... l • ......::.: ...... ..... ...... . ....................................... - P4 I ag = 1 1 > PROPO:SED• STORM OND. 20 TION :LOC I • LOCATION PLA EXPLORA `:.:: :: .TERRA AMBERWOOD ,1,1,.- ..::.:-_',',..,:-..''.-..1.7.,.',',.. ,...::-.:.....-.. " • �`.���\� ASSOCIATES. RENTON, WASHINGTON .. - ; • : _ _. _ - ' ''otechnical Consultants. Proj.No. 4725-1 Date. SEPT. .2000- Figure 2 • • • • 12" MINIMUM WIDE FREE-DRAINING `GRAVEL SLOPE TO DRAIN ete; •.... :... `COMPACTED • iv,: :: STRUCTURAL FILL: . / • . ..... . ,• ;, /, EXCAVATED SLOPE • Vie (SEE REPORT TEXT FOR APPROPRIATE t�.:.:. .... / INCLINATIONS) • j:••ri't''$" -t'r'r•?4160 / • .............e......... 12" OVER PIPE -- INSAMPOLV • •..S.r: 3" BELOW PIPE 4" DIAMETER PERFORATED PVC PIPE ' NOT TO SCALE RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE DETAIL !`� ~ TERRA AMBERWOOD •"\�'•��\�\ ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON •• ' ' Geotechnical Consultants Proj.No. 4725-1 Date SEPT. 2000 Figure 3 BUILDING SLAB . . ... • ' . •- . ' :-. ' .• • .....-:::. 7. T.Fi' " t* R.:A.L.:.:•:•:: ...." '..> • . = -.BACKF(LL _. - -- % / - \> - . 4- v:if-1...:::::...A..1 ..4..V. ..9"ggit.. . :-......7. ' :: . . -:- . . _.. . - '1,, , Z. .,AffitiVi4 iTY \. • A ..i\.• •i\ i. i. . i\ .,�. i\ i /i . 4". PERFORATED PVC PIPE • 3/4" WASHED ROCK • . • NOT TO SCALE • TYPICAL FOOTING DRAIN DETAIL T;. .t ''.. TERRA AMBERWOOD .":'`��� ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON .• '''"otechnical Consultants Proj.No. 4725-1 Date SEPT. 2000 Figure 4 • •- APPENDIX A . FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING • Amberwood Renton,Washington On August 21, 2000, we performed our field exploration using a'rubber-tired backhoe. We explored subsurface soil conditions at the site by excavating seven test pits to depths of.between three and ten feet below existing surface grades. The test pit locations are shown on Figure 2.- The test pit logs are:presented on Figures A-2 through A-5. 'A"geologist from our office conducted the field exploration, classified the soil conditions encountered,maintained a-log of each test pit,obtained representative soil samples, and observed pertinent site features. All soil samples were visually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System(USCS)described on Figure A- 1. . Representative soil;samples obtained from the test pits were placed in closed containers and taken to our laboratory for further examination and testing: The moisture content of each sample was measured and..is reported on the test pit logs. Grain,size analyses were performed on-three of the samples..:The results are shown on Figures A-6 and A-7. MAJOR DIVISIONS - LETTER - • . TYPICAL DESCRIPTION • • SYMBOL - . - Clean GW Well-graded gravels, gravel sand mixtures, little or no CD - ' GRAVELS: - Gravels fines. (less At than J � - = • - - .G P ' Poorly-graded gravels, gravel-sandmixtures, little.or. .zy cull ' •--More than -5% fines) - no fines. - . . • •-. N To •50% of coarse •Silty gravels, gravel-sand-silt mixtures, non-plastic fraction.is GM n E > larger than:No.•. Gravels ,-.fines. • w a) - with fines .Z :cg'rn - . . •. •4 sieve : GC ' Clayey-gravels, gravel-sand-day mixtures, -plastic fines. g. • C7 0-- - Clean • SW - Well-graded sands,-gravelly•sands; little or•no.fines: • c .SANDS Sands 0 _0 Z- (less-than Poorly-graded sands*or gravelly-sands, little:or no -. .13: = g .. More than -5/o fines)-•-•- : :SP-. fines. - -- . • .. .. <- w 2. : 50% ,of coarse 0 - O •:fraction is • .. SM -Silty sands, sand-silt mixtures,-non-plastic•fines. - U g • smaller than Sands No. 4 sieve : with fines SC. . . • Clayey•sands, sand-clay mixtures,,plastic fines. • ML .Inorganic silts,,•rock flour,•clayey silts with slight J •m 0 SILTS AND CLAYS plasticity. - . - - 0• 8 N . • CL, Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity, (lean clay). E c 0 Liquid limit is less than 50% . _._ LLJ o Z cc - r O L . Organic silts and organic clays of low plasticity. Z Lcecom • _ . Q c ct • - --- - M H-; Inorganic silts, elastic. - - 0 E a� °' - SILTS AND CLAYS - W . . 0) E as 'C H _ - .Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays. . Z o cn Liquid limit is greater than 50% . OH . Organic-clays of high plasticity. HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS' - • ' •PT. ' •-Peat • . - DEFINITION OF TERMS AND SYMBOLS • Standard Penetration 2" OUTSIDE DIAMETER SPLIT Density Resistance in Blows/Foot I SPOON SAMPLER • C-9 Very loose 0-4 7 2.4" INSIDE DIAMETER RING SAMPLER 8Loose 4-10 OR SHELBY TUBE SAMPLER o Medium dense 10-30 ' z Dense 30-50 ' 1 WATER LEVEL (DATE) Very dense >50 • Tr TORVANE READINGS, tsf Standard Penetration Pp :PENETROMETER READING, tsf • • gConsistency Resistance in Blows/Foot • DD DRY DENSITY, pounds per cubic foot . U Very soft 0-2 LL LIQUID LIMIT, percent o Soft 2-4 - I— Medium stiff 4-8 PI PLASTIC INDEX --1 Stiff 8-16 "i Very stiff 16-32 N STANDARD PENETRATION, blows per foot Hard >32 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM `4 TERRA AMBERWOOD ASSOCIATES KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-4725-1 Date SEPT 2000 Figure A-1 Test Pit ' No. TP-1 Logged by: PR Date: 8/21/00 Depth . Moisture • Tv!en(ft.) CSoil Description t ' _ -3 inches topsoil. _ FILL light yellowish-brown silty gravelly sand,medium dense,dry::(SM) • 12 . 5.— • Dark brownsiltySAND with wood debris,organic odor,medium dense,moist. (SM) - Olive-gray silty gravelly SAND,moderately cemented,verydense,moist.'(SM) 14 10 . ▪ Test pit terminated at 10 feet • No groundwater encountered. . .. 15 . - Test Pit ' No. TP-2 • Logged by: PR Date: 8/21/00 Depth Moisture - (ft.) Soil Description C(t nt 0 - FILL:lightolive-graysilty gravelly sand,medium dense,moistto dry. (SM) - FILL:reddish-brown silty gravelly sand,with woody debris,medium 20 ▪ dense,dry. (SM) 5— _ Olive-gray silty gravelly SAND,moderately cemented,very dense, moist. (SM) 14 10— Test pitterminated at 9 feet. - No groundwater encountered. 15 TEST PIT LOGS TERRA AMBERWOOD ���\\� KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON ASSOCIATES Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-4525-1 Date SEPT 2000 Figure A-2 Test Pit No: TP-3 - •Logged by: PR 'Date: 8/21/00 • Depth Moisture - . .: (ft.) . Content _ Soil Description (%) Reddish-brown silty gravelly SAND,-with organic debris(wood and roots), - - -- - medium dense,dry.-(SM) - - - Olive-gray silty gravelly SAND,moderately cemented,very dense,moist (SM) _. 12 • _ Test pitterminated at6feet • . • No groundwater encountered. 10 Test Pit No. TP-4 Logged by: PR . . . • Date: 8/21/00 Depth - -. . .Moisture Content (ft.) Soil Description (%) 0 - Yellowish-brown silty gravelly SAND, medium dense, dry. (SM) _ Olive-gray silty gravelly SAND; moderately cemented,very dense, moist (SM) 7 5 Test pit terminated at 5 feet No groundwater encountered. 10 TEST PIT LOGS TERRA AMBERWOOD 6 • ASSOCIATES KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 4aGeotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-4525-1 Date SEPT 2000 Figure A-3 Test Pit No. TP-5 Logged by: PR Date: 8/21/00 Depth • Moisture (ft) •Soil Description . (�o) • nt 0 . , Yellowish-brown silty gravelly SAND, medium dense, dry. (SM) . . 'Olive-gray silty.gravelly SAND,moderately cemented,very dense, dry. (SM) • . •11 5- Test-pit terminated at 5 feet - No groundwater encountered. 10 .- Test Pit No. TP-6 Logged by: PR .. - Date: 8/21/00 Depth . , .. Moisture (ft.) Soil Description. Content (%) • 0 Reddish-brown silty SAND with gravel,with organic debris(wood and - roots),loose,dry. (SM) - Olive-gray silty gravelly SAND, moderately cemented,very dense, moist. . 8 Test pit terminated at 3 feet. 5_ No groundwater encountered. 10 TEST PIT LOGS TERRA AMBERWOOD ASSOCIATES KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON keebrinGeotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-4525-1 Date SEPT 2000 Figure A-4 • Test., Pit No. TP-7 Logged by: PR Date: 8/21/00 - Depth • Moisture (ft.) • .Soil Description Content . p (/o) -. 0 - Reddish-brown silty gravelly SAND, loose,.dry. (SM) • • Olive-gray:silty gravelly SAND,moderately cemented,very dense, - .dry. (SM) 10 . 5^ Test pit terminatedat4 feet. = • No groundwater encountered. . • • 10 • TEST PIT LOGS ``+ , TERRA AMBERWOOD ASSOCIATES KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON tomradiaGeotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-4525-1 1Date SEPT 2000 Figure A-5 1 SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS ' SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES I NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, US STANDARD _ - • ' GRAIN SIZE IN MM � .� N C W N �� i�D��D ? ? O 90 O $ rn $ Is, b b N b of •g o o - 10 s D--1 80 - 20 g. v)rn c, O 73 c7 70 _ 30 m n� Z - -1 60 40 n. w z 50 50 N m CO m 40 - 60 0 v pi . . o. C) 30 70 m p _ _ N —I 20 _ _ - 80 (7' I 73 C) _ Z > 10 90 o o> z N z K 0 I it 11 I l I fill I I I I IIIIII I I 1 !III 100 cn mJV O O O S S 8 O O O O O ;' t4 N O Qf 'A.W N b b b b .r9 b b b b b b b O O O OD O� ? �"� N O O O O O r71al n73 m GRAIN SIZE. IN 'MILLIMETERS 4. W N • �� D COARSE FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE o z p r COBBLES GRAVELSAND FINES O C/1_ Z Moisture Test Pit De th Moist Key Number (ft. USCS Description Content (�) LL PL 1 • TP-1 5.5 SP—SM gravelly SAND with silt 0 TP-2 8.0 SM silty SAND with gravel SIEVE ANALYSIS 'HYDROMETER ANALYSIS• . SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES I NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, US STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MM • \\ \\\\ \ N . ch . O O O C O . C O O O O 0. O O N Of . cm to N CO NI CO - - 0 O C O. O O cr. -P. W N W Of -P. W N ' '../:;. 1004\ ' N. 0 . 10 D—I 80 20 �rn \--- _ . . rn � O� � 70 so ,nnD z -cn --I 6040 b-j Zrn 50 50 canm 7-< 40 60 CO v Fri o. C5 30 70 M 2 o --I _ 20 80 N cn I :LJ . m D 10 - 90 Z 0 o D Z rn ZK 0 I II 11 f 1 r LI 1 I ] r I I • rim 1. 1 1 II I I 100 N W N CO 07 W N DD O) ? W N . (n M NIO O 0 0 O O O O O --'Oo a7 W N O b b W N 0 0 O O O O •O m D m 0 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS, ° . W N o No =8p Z COARSE FINE ' COARSE I• MEDIUM 1 FINE. . o =o rD— COBBLES t GRAVEL SAND FINES 0 Z cn Test Pit Depth Moisture Key Number (f{,) USCS Description Content (%) LL PL s. • TP-3 5.5 SM silty SAND with gravel • ► 'wry/ DEVE O MENT�' r�, i G REAAPiV JAN J 0 2001 PROJECT NARRATIVE RECEIVE® Amberwood is located at 6001 NE 4th Street in Renton, Washington. The site will have two access points one from NE 4th Street located in the northeastern portion of the site and a second access point will occur with a connection to the Maplewood Estates development to the West of the site. The zoning for the property is R-5 and the site currently has one single-family residence along with its associated out buildings. The existing vegetation on the site consists of a combination of coniferous trees, deciduous trees, and a variety of shrubs and plants associated with the landscaping of a single-family residence. The property to the West and the South of the site is the Maplewood Estates development, which is currently under construction. To the east of the site is a single-family residence currently used as a rental property. The north side of the site is bordered by NE 4m Street. The site is generally flat and slopes gently to the southwest corner at approximately 5%. According to the Geotechnical Report by Terra Associates, Inc., written September 15, 2000, the site is entirely underlain by Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam, (0 to 6 percent)which is considered a moderately well drained soil. Other than the over grown vegetation, no other special features such as wetland areas or steep slopes exist on the site. This application proposes a 18 lot preliminary plat on the 4.63-acre site under the existing requirements for an R-5 zone. The average lot size will be 7,849 S.F. and the proposed density is 4.78 DU/AC. The homes are anticipated to be in the middle income price range. The proposal will require the removal of one single- family residence and its associated out buildings. Construction of the site will result in 90-95% of the site being developed and will require the removal of most of the existing vegetation. The purpose of the grading and clearing is to construct the proposed public streets to city standards and to provide building pads and utility locations for the single-family residences. The grading is intended to be balanced on-site, with all cut and fill material originating from within the site. The development will provide the appropriate on-site stormwater management facilities as indicated on the site plan. Storm water runoff from the site will be routed to a 2-celled detention/wetpond that will be constructed within a storm drainage tract in the Southwest corner of the site. The tract will be deeded to the Homeowners Association, and all maintenance will be the responsibility of the Homeowners Association. All storm drainage control facilities will be designed according to the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual. The pond outfall will be connected to the Maplewood Estates storm drainage system. The • lots will be served by interior access roads as well as access easements, all of which will be designed and built to the City of Renton standards. We are proposing to reduce the right-of-way width for the internal access roads to 42 feet. Per City of Renton Development Regulations Section 4-6-060 R.3, % • Reduced Right-of-Way Dedication, this reduction allows the creation of additional lots within the shape and size constraints of the site. Landscaping for the individual lots will be installed by the homebuyer and will consist of both informal and formal plantings. Access to the internal road will-be from NE 4th Street and the Maplewood subdivision. All design and construction for the improvements both on and off site, will be to the City of Renton standards. The estimated construction cost for the improved lots is $500,000, with fair market value at approximately $1,235,000. Only the public street right-of-way is intended to be dedicated to the City of Renton. CORE4205 I48th Avenue N.E.Suite 200 DESIGN - Bellevue,Washington 98007 ENGINEERING • PLANNING • SURVEYING 425.885.7877 Fax.425.885.7963 RANSAIIITTAL TO JOB NO. 0005g City of Renton — Development-Services-DivisioRATE 02/02/01 Renton-City Hall;6th-Floor ATTN: -Elizabeth Higgins, AICP 1055-South-Grady Way REF: Amberwood PPLT Renton, WA 98055 2 - HZ)L't MAIL DELIVER PICKUP TRANSMITTED FOR: YOUR USE X PER REQUEST INFORMATION ONLY ACTION REQUIRED: PROCESSING REPLY RETURN NONE QUANTITY DATED DESCRIPTION 5 Copies 1131/2001- -Revised Preliminary Storm Drainage Calculations. 4--Sets 8.5 X-TIPMT reductions DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON • FEB--0 2- 2001 RECEIVED COMMENTS CC: B. Herma sen, Project Planner • NW 1/4,NW 1/4,SEC. 14, TWP23 N.,RGE.5E., W.M. o ^ A 1 ` N.L. 4TH 5T.- SCALE: 1' = 40' k yaw.-_ _-_._,�. u. '' £ , _ ,aaz:ism y `/ _�74 i 1L1 \ '� BNCHMAK wo rsims':i bW u as ua or,v a 9uK a uw lsat wna� EMMA WA sea59re.1 ;:I n \ rt4aTN"K 91MA999UW/Q 019G NTNL NT.NL 4IN ST.{$L 12DIM STJ4 19129Y STN 51t0f„ o� a.454.7r0R(155.LNESI00) (2591 T•0005LANK)OAf10D' .n I I RA2105•eacw.3.5950RA0:019L.0100 NT.9L 12801 5T.4 15,,\ AK9L RANNEWENGINEERSURVEIDR a '_ 1 ,547.9.013(1.1.0131.15.) maor9lu.olc 7e y ,p. x C. N35)a59.78T1 0010.01I �I�rer ! 1 u rcw,.v.+wwuaw,s..cv 7 `, �►+ z • �, ' T .1.2. R/W SO ra• c e J artSITE STATISTICS 5. 39 .a 40 5 1 18 ��5 I I�• ' ` uw wS Nma Nsrrn.,.T rno ��0i u I C 1 ` \ Ioa j G NROx.uRnfwaeR Z \ s° ' "ROO(CEMENT (SLENT CONCRETE STWIPNG 2.900 L.Y.cTN'627F.TSIEWA(K rmnTxAE awe a wrmr so "\I • 'Im -‘\‘‘ ' �• I i TYPICAL ON-SITE ROAD SEC77ON �v"�N 4.�4Y. //�� Fhb ' 6 ela'a' \� NO SCALE 4A100 cY w \ V I • \ �,, W ' T o I • 1 ��I - E� \ I a 1 110 i c �. �" S,mcuwc nu.SLOE LEGEND 41 1: 42 ` a / / so FULL OWN u' a"r r.s ro(eanwc / FF •-- ( ROAD YO NFULL O a'.�ar EFAIlQR —W—w"ipt UIMY V ml Ilk IMa1 I a� O. 'l\�I'n\ ROAD �a' I —90—STOMA MANAGE UNIT l�o I1 I �as[15 14 A �: Oro NEII'[IE90/OULC —9D—SfWll wuwr!lmrrc —v1 s96 I t'(,+r' ,wc CROWD _4ao—nuo5m CONTOUR ONATIO1 � J l Owaxu VA)F LrrW AAm SLar.A[m LINE —80—dams L wax EtromcI to Q J —4'2 \ 4fl^W a 1�' \ AREA TO FRONDE A=TABLE 5UD-BASE 5•CEMENT CONCRETE�EMAEN ROOmO' VS O y�� �e R,I► I I � I$ \ mravr mwa�e(rnncu.CURB ;°'ne1OIXa• 1 DRIVEWAYS c4 O O 4 a y AND Q T EN l �Z SEORLW A-A Z 3 ► rf *ilk N.E.47NST.HALFSTREET/MPROVEMENTS F`+' W bI 43 ,1 No SCALE .. m �yy b zI wart L W lit% - =;�T- _— a /s 111R :�- I � i 1g,a,R t(. T _ a°o ro—r —j to, :1il w 45 46 11 1 \‘..,. 'iv I L I `- g J \ •g a Ill bLragik Z rc tiry 881fi'•.••W.•• .57=seems' w N''''' a^"Im-. 1 R F rc 47 n 48 SR,. : o a a 49 50 51 52 xi.. 53 , SHEET OF I f 1 1 l PRe LOT N�Naa 00059 "I it I 11; Ir 1 I I - Y I / ]WG,iI 6T61141, a o pp ! 5a �- 1 IV 1f I /-''-'1.j' III:- ` A - TDy B /I 1 'JIDT,iI rut 3�—i qg 1 _______—''' .i )_„.--. .--. ., ...t.., .! i -- ..._,-, - •,,, _... ..,., r,,,,_,, , ,„. ,, qi�a III'` '' G j I ix $4411i I EI $ • $1 5, I $ I 6 NI w 2 l L� _�I _ I 1 • i._ 1 1 ____av--- -__-�I I I --._-_ n _-LB �9.2Z41!E AM%lc FENCE „/ 615.62-y _''' _-a?J _4vs -- .M /�♦ _4ro i , ,, , , ,,_, pp / j I 15 z / +.ro--f� 1 R ___�x x x� - / -/ / ,' si'i)). 1--- I! • ( -,,,-;,4,-;, ,,, ,, i ' r , , . 1.?„ . .:,____. .., ,, ,,,7„,,,...- ,-- , . ,, „, k,,, ,• ,,...,,,, ,,,, , , i,....• .,.• . ..._.. vz- , , ,2. ,f ) / .t. /.. • _ __,,__- di zol - / /.''N 6023_56_E .xvcL-616TT-___ --.+____ • sl Yzlcn •A —� Z G /ri GRAVEL / // 1/ / / 1 / L,/ —_____ —___________ I 1 / / / - I 1 GwG.LI MIS n 11I / I/i G c/ Z / I / I / 1 / C. 111 / ' / // / % I / I I UI / / / / i I 1 / I I 1 / , IIn / • '-' I O Z c : n g 4 0 O g • • D G n m D a �4 T 11 HMI oPI i 0 g ii a $ v e Q � � �PN 1n PU 4D N mef _ � a8 , -< i - p z Q o pl ,. A 150to / 1 �4 1 i "�1j z 8 # :n NH, N jog m gg i 6 PI, As 1 Q qs9 G 4g b�A h 11 Iiiill 1 I1E -1 � 4 R 2 A 8 p q _K..1.f) 1 Ni Nile it r p i s e1 iR 9 Iop 4 RR 0 RE g it g a g h A NW 1/4 NW 1/4 SEC. 14 TWP. 23 N, R. 6 E, W.M. 1.5,41 DATE JANUARY 26,2001 BOUNDARY& TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY ••C..• Oar l DESIGNED �O� IMY N.I,A�NC SA IGG 1 1 PER qTY WNYENTS 1/7s/01 o D DRAWN LR8 AMBERWOOD 4`' "tY-'4, • OO1 C APPROVED NORTHWEST BROKERS,AMBERWOOD LLC• `DESIGN •as"'�'''' army TAl; 0 0 :` g ' PROJECT w N 7A Sr ` 'y,. MANAGER RENTON, WA 98059 ENGINEERING• PLANNING• SURVEYING „ul� • NW 1/4 NW 1/4 SEC. 14, TWP. 23 N., ROE. 6 E., W.M. -- -- N.E. 4TH_ST. — a i ru. g * i ' • ' . • m GONER/APPLICANT a E ? ` .._ ,\,, I \ •', W _ DAVO•NNOT A 1 NEa1 GWII t1N 6TECT r A.•ee .s I,•,S i _o - :s TR-� i ffNra1 wa eax 3 2 ' 4 v�l c• 3 -_ 'y: =,, a CI °$`erGP, - ° 11a uc, \ Tm,s. 1--°ro.°. . S > '� L\ i \ \O` ao?" SCALE: 1. _ �. xa�) w • i.:' �,' / L J L Q cilii.O CO FLAMIER/EN NEER/BUK'EYOR uyy�0.1 ,I W 'J _ - �L. u I _ ___ AM148l11A`L NE SATE]CO Z ,� y /� }� `` 1 \ L .o (sae)eEE-DAENNGTON m001 . )'�, \ • CONTACT,LAPS NER1M1lEN-Pb.r . �ii SsRD,ct \ LEGAL DESCRIPTION Gr - _ . ` .. - \ '\ SE EAST 1441)GP TIE NORRFABT QUARTER CI THE NORMIEDT 0 •/----- `- f�m r.i -:..N \�/" • It<\ �''���`• NO RAW..EAST,WILvrc�i�IAN.N`�"icun.GOMn'. 23 SITE STATISTICS - { I ` I I , 71. UU+d1PGTQ4 Z c vi-p / 9 f'. ... ,.''R I . ) EXCEPT nE NORTN aT 1EET TIERECP CONVEYED TO MG cater � d EVE-e.D camp w1. l! • .7.7. ,'-I_' _�-I•,, avN :_ `tmIB'• <�` ' 1 F ., FOR ROAD A!¢•00E6 Ai DEED RECORDED(DOER REGORDN]NO. TEAR-,ry ' 2 • .:'• •° tl• _ 'f'` --- - el]�iCU. TOTAL enTE Al6Yb IaTJ1.OF.(4.63 AQffe) AD = I� L I Ax tl �; I �•i , L_��__ PROPOSED IYF Eora v PAMaT Na'ED lii• . t6.. .S • k i i 10)= \.Iy °�' y $ °• BENCHMARK AVERAGE LOT e0.1414e SP. / g F'\ a •-- �I WNW f1Af4C0 PER GMT.OF 1®Ral&09 90 0t ON NAY, 0 DATU1 FP:OP:RED DEMME.alb DVAC !: 4•.�ti:f.,`,• s m P'A®].3'ERAO6 eU FACE OW.N Tie INT.NE 4TN 0T.(0E D0114 PER IT1ED'JEROME.a D1A0 C� • _----sa O _�L—••-__.� _� o, 1 I I EGADtTOR(NFCIERS) EXISTING KEN. R-e ___AL__ eb r PT I03•ISRG1QN ERASE e1FTAGE DISC.N THE M.SE EMI 0T.4 &MEET AREA. 31KE Er.(10AE Cr NTE) W a;6TR . = , • _I' ', _'"I \!— voo.°P. 3 I ' '• ;. BAN OER DOlao METERS) a'EN erALE/ b eraal ROPE aP.rEa GE ertE) i t V J ? ' I' •., , - AP 01¢0.1ATE LOC TGN Cr CONTOI RD y ^ --- I - •' , -`\�° • ea-.B I� 1`µ`_:I 9 NOT NR1eTED '.r/M�C;� _ _ .i";-YYY S' 6h J Q J - __ ,,_.,, '.; $ ( �♦ 2: •-- g$g,l N 4O Coo — 11 1 , TA.M.,.'•\1• .1 �., \ . DI Qp I QkO73 Pri''Mil .a YA' �9 1• a I •13 )`$ iR :�'`III 1 I E ���Sa V .C 1, ..Q J = v ®t 3' 4F, �� Alum'sae T E uP.bn II \ RENTON = '� — L L J tJ I ID M.rm®tucwl{ g z L �" I I � '-- x; -mwm ln'rrtew� ^I NV6816'06',W: b =-327.67b i/_='•M �/ _---__ _ n m'a' E Y N ; iiiPTA„y°IP JEwa;,`'18$^2 1 I j !' i o 1 , &tree• 1•. Rlt.,CP.�y?PE6,� � � �. I w 4fi �i , I "'M.4.� �I yCLU-'':$ ti�ghp•,1Fq=l1.�!`�$..• v,�y- - �' y I P I. 1 1�1411i..rkoilige SHEET aOF i. . r $ _ y I B VICINI MAP ED NEIGI4BORHOOD DETAIL MAP N r• • PROJECT 00050 • -- . - ., , .\/ ,... ___J, tri , . 4t.. r , ... , , ,// / I' }��{ , ,,,/ / , , , ,„,,, ,, , I ,i.:,-.„-- 7,0J,Z1?Tr _1 Ni It IN / / , 'I /%1 0//iiI L v • c ill 1 1 \-- Jr4/1 1 // // /'6 -1! 'e --''' V- --- ''.4 /''' i ' .41' / m, ` Il m I� �/ N of oo xry w --- ii; 1 1 ; • s } NE,,,,,-,-;"- r b 1.I/ ! ti 1l ,A i R03ARI0 PLAC NE. - / iJ • l ��N r I E, RI \ I_ , �;-rW �• / •--h-'—o• •'I_ j.<:. '/ /° R0SARIO AVE.NE.' .�I i A / j ' N 0_2J'S8' /f-i/ rn i /! /// i' so w > 4 3 r t ' xx q Q D p5 D �I 23 !V i ^ G) al yyz Dr Z R 8 m t a Its • g i 114 11111kill liPsi l g A NW 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC. 14 TWP. 23 N, R. 6 E, W.M. DATE ✓ANUARr zs,zoa TREE CUTTING& CLEAR/NO PLAN �, i pa,a"`>r`ca,McNu ,.z"aa Cp V R DESIGNED CAFE HERMANSEN w l,enA�.Ne SAP xo C, DRAWN F.KATONA AMBERWOOD CORE , tl ,,,,,VW MOP di 'O'APPROVED AMBERWOOD L.L.C. ` ,- E� 421880,'`rn"""'°" - - g v ' CRAIG.1 KRUEGER 191z9 SE 1427W SE PROJECT MANAGER RENTON WA 90059 ENGINEERING• PLANNING• SURVEYING 4205 148th Ave.N.E.Suite 200 CORE Bellevue,Washington 98007 425.885.7877 Fax 425.885.7963 DESIGN E-malkoffice@cleionline.com 64. IFS® PRELIMINARY STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS for AMBERWOOD RENTON, WASHINGTON vrAsP.S CORE Project No.: 00059 Prepared by: Brennan P. Taylor,P.E. 3 f s Approved by: David E. Cayton,P.E. l' '�tsTs , Date: November, 2000 � � 11 - 6- op ENGINEERING • PLANNING • SURVEYING AMBERWOOD RENTON,WASHINGTON PRELIMINARY STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS Section I. Introduction II. Offsite Analysis A. Upstream Drainage • B. On-Site Drainage C. Downstream Drainage III. Flow Control and Water Quality Analysis and Design A. Hydraulic Analysis B. Detention Routing Calculations C. Water Quality Calculations , • I. Introduction The Preliminary Plat of Amberwood is located south of SE_128t Street(NE 4th St.) approximately 1000 feet east of 148th Avenue SE in Renton, Washington. This parcel is approximately 4.2 Acres in size and slopes from northeast to southwest at an average grade of approximately 7%. The existing site is approximately 60%young alder saplings, Douglas fir, western hemlock and with thick underbrush(2nd growth forest). The remainder of the parcel is occupied by a single-family residence, gravel driveway and grass lawn. The property is bordered by the Plat of Maplewood (currently under construction) to the west and south,NE 4th on the north and large lot single family residence and commercial facility to the east. The proposed improvements include the construction of 19 single-family dwellings with related grading, utility, and road improvements. A half street improvement to 152nd Ave SE is proposed along the eastern property line and will connect to NE 4th St. There will also be a road connection to the Plat of Maplewood in the northwestern portion of the site. Onsite generated storm water runoff will be directed to a combination wetpondldetention pond in the southwest corner of the site and will discharge to the recently constructed storm drainage system in the Plat of Maplewood. 1 - 5 4 3• 2 9 10 II R .ENTON / NE 4TI4.ST. .c7� �yt �3 GREENWOOD 4 � CEMETERY W / IZ Igo 15 $4 CEDAR MAPLEWOOD GOLF COURSE I\ VICINITY MAP 1" ■ 3000't VICINITY MAP AMBERWOOD CORE DESIGN NO. 00059 1 ' o II. Offsite Analysis A. UPSTREAM DRAINAGE There are no upstream tributary areas draining onto the site. Runoff from NE 4th Street right-of-way drains to the west along the south side of the road and flows offsite to the west. Runoff from the adjacent parcel to the east is intercepted by an existing ditch along the adjacent gravel driveway and flows south onto the Maplewood property. This proposed development will not change either existing upstream drainage pattern. B. ON-SITE DRAINAGE Stormwater runoff on-site generally flows in a southwesterly direction over the existing terrain and is tributary to the Maplewood property to the west and south. • C. DOWNSTREAM DRAINAGE Runoff from Amberwood drains onto the Maplewood Property site. The Maplewood Property project will construct single family lots along the west and south sides of Amberwood. A 12"storm drainage line from the new Maplewood storm drainage system will be stubbed to the west property line, approximately 110 feet north of the southwest corner of the Amberwood Property. As mentioned earlier, the Maplewood Property is currently under construction. The storm water runoff from the Amberwood Property is conveyed approximately 3500 feet through the newly constructed storm drainage system of the Maplewood Property. The Maplewood storm system discharges to a pair of 24"culverts located immediately south of the intersection of 148th Ave SE and SE 136th St. The twin 24" culverts convey storm water to a grassy swale which runs southeast and then south for approximately 700 feet until it reaches a 30"CM?Pipe on the north side of the Plat of Briar Hills. II. Offsite Analysis (cont.) • C. DOWNSTREAM DRAINAGE (cont.) This 30" CMP pipe directs the flows through the Plat of Briar Hills at varying slopes of 0.6 to 3.8% (see Figure 3 for Downstream Drainage Map). There is one"off-line" detention pond approximately 4900 feet downstream which is thoroughly grassed and shows no sign of recent inundation. The 30"inch CMP ultimately drains to another"off- line" detention pond approximately 5800 feet downstream near the south end of Briar Hills. This detention pond shows evidence of recently detained flows filling up the bottom 2 feet of the pond(the pond has seven feet of available storage). This pond releases to a rip-rapped discharge at the top of a natural drainage ravine. The ravine eventually discharges to the Cedar River approximately one and a half miles downstream of the subject property. The downstream flow path has no apparent signs of flooding or extensive erosion. 3 i 'Y NOTi TRI 'RV<' ' ."'.:a..402 4.•;.°a ..,.:S sna.;rv,:a.:..:ar, '/ _ .....c 'v i F w.san'?"'N area`sre' Pa,. —��„,n.�,... —;- •9g �, fi ,i, k,' 'r" .xl'•"'wG'? C4°:'#?5. ;?s; IIr,..:'Mt _ __._ —� •-ryy •, '� ,; y Lim, ae.. li 1,..� — „ i �rl= • i 1 3a • L1'° •f, , 1 idle4 \` y I ( o► • . \ p . . L it, ....„, ,..... I , . I r �1f� �/�{ l , • I , N • r'••a r.+ V. .11.r . 1 i (.‘V3 3 1 I. • r.I,.1• I..w el; B K 1e 137110 ST, -- 1 "'' `yam -V�"� !weal -Aft,i• . ' 1' i I H . II . i ai rpm:m • 0 , ;T i .. .. , .... i r 1 • 4, ,ii 4,4. r--- ' e • . . / IQ 'i MO.r TO/1.TMOCN. ' . ..•• E: 0 1 ! i,. • ad, i • • 1 I I ,t • II I i • A..., M�IfW�� I .r•m�... ..., O l... NO1"M10• 01011TOtl • u 00 00 TH sT ...-'-.- o� .-M11, 1®p _�.+�"r ' µ --. / • .wl.1e vi''�e s�Milli 1T • j '�.r~- ^!L 001f 4 aw.w. M`.o,uaMw •�i i M - j i I )i IM irli it •$J; _ __ tl.Yr - • I i • • •• 7,1111 �- i . , . SS tal 30 CMP / ,•• 1 F`i itl. k �+ it , pTI -,p.% •sur y i 1 _ • '1 .81 Y it tl •. i i . i p i —7—.+. Am ;1. . ;, 1 i ,1 • . . . • f.. - 'it • I ) •. '' - Ifi Y , NN • N 11 CO , #) • no. farldilleV f *.•:-. . Ire/ . DETENTION 1 • 'r,0�' «.. -- . vim • PONDS iR. i Ilt tl,„-._ illSi Nis Iwiligille.!: • ... _ L1• YfTT7l — r,f • • ,-_ „ , RAVINE . , . I i i1. 1111 Ma _ itirl I... EMI ' Villi, ...‘"*'....41. i '• I 'WI.' a;1 re. n i t: , . Ell Zki • . . ... 0,,.....,..-. 1 • ............_._J • • g t.,, .- ' ZIP "Itilatif , H.. •. ...., • .... lilt , . p ,. . ti, , . • 1 , z MN�� i w wiM :.r aasa s- ;z d 0 • cii, . 5 . vz ›•• . . .. HI. Flow Control and Water Quality Analysis and Design A. Hydraulic Analysis The drainage analysis was modeled using the King County Runoff Time Series software. The onsite soils are Alderwood,hydrologic group C and KCRTS group Till. See soils map included in Section 3 Offsite Analysis of this report. The site is located in the Sea- Tac rainfall region with a location scale factor of 1.0. Existing Conditions The site area is 4.7 acres in size. The existing ground cover is 60% till-forest and 40%till pasture. The following information was used for generating time series and flow frequencies. EXISTING CONDITIONS Total Area=4.70 acres (00059existing) GROUND COVER AREA(acre) Till-pasture 1.88 Till-Forest 2.82 Onsite existing conditions flow frequency analysis: PEAK FLOW RETURN (CFS) PERIOD 0.438 100 year 0.396 50 year 0.310 25 year 0.252 10 year 0.245 5 year 0.224 3 year 0.146 2 year 0.095 1.3 year 0.017 1.1 year /.V VV //q , /V VI/ //ly 0rrI r S • -______.-_._-_____. .---------NI:. 4TH__ST. EXISTING • A _ __._- __._ _-_.__ _ __... .._ _ _ _ _• _ 12°WATER MAIN • �- _ FOG LINE l O 1• _ _ OF E d7Ok(1 U.,W flrE ;f''f1C p �i+ `� • FIAL .._,,,> ? _..._.`' 1• n . • — : . _ _; .. _ ; J! iiiir __—v �1 ' : . . - r . -f---—I1 �I !_ es _• - ! as:-0 \ I I I t_mti_ • +1rj FO ND-�2RE�9AR , 1` � f? ow -__W 'C-'DE1-282 $_ ?, �. \ -,1I I I N rn I. r1'-' CORNER A g z 4)\/ nI v I 3i. w I JN A7 I ` I; Cl; IN-d C IfiI.y PI _I I N 4 L r (.1 P 37 38 e , Fli 4 3 \ \ $ • FIIi• U7R1 'ezc 502 — � 4 \PROPOS ° ,.-1\ f510 I I` • 998` __. _ .soQ S' ARY 5EAF�R �bil \ s .----,-----4,1_ . ____7-•_ ,i, .„ \ .., ,,. \ i,.21/..- t.-,,,,,-K , ! • mi......... ihaft,.... li.,461111 .01 .." — ,.. ,-., . . .mminien Lim . 1 r____. ..,,, .......„, _ . ....... m.........„ . _ 111,111wilma li SS SS jII,E' `y \•�IfR1,IIA�Y1 ! 4 — lin ---� i' `w ' ti FUTURE m_ ' L ✓ EAS11116 ,• 5�8°WATER MAIN `�^+N / \ , ' , „ '^I\1, 1 :.,,,,,,... \ ,. i 5 \ La 39 40 18 i , 1 I \ s :..,....2---...„(1°8-1:.: � `Y__.\ — ° I • -__.__-.,-_._490_.__•-, PROPOSED 12° �, \ iJ ' \ I \` —_`M1 \ �y i6 I ` STORM DRAIN t• s�'s✓ ' / I I 1 f� x N\•., .____,,1:12.\\N„,.._. , • \ -\ . --____N\; z, c (' :, 1 '� ,. FFes`` b--_...... .�.,\ / • r� I'�i Z \ ` .� —•.V `�`. �� - r �...o,ws+..—n.�� ey,1,y,,.+,�•�. ! iT✓-I .,may W / "'�_ 41 �j a: +^'I , 7 \-......, > 1, _° ' f� / �. / r = PROPOSED 8° / ( 'n a \ anrZ d rn" WATERMAIN(M'.)' 11 HOUSE: I t I; ° I ! .� 15 ! ( 14 r y I > m r, 111111. _.�_..4f'9--- \‘‘., ___ 484--�'I i 'sty �`�C' I L � ___ i 1 ;121 e. \ \ - :01 . rrt . x \ li 76 — ,, *' I ,.. \ ` iI I SQU \ 5LQ:,,) 1,. ...:::::. --GA:-A-G-EII \ 1 7.t.,:: 1. ----41-94_, \ • FUTURE \ \ .�• ~Rc5 ,.,. JI `. 13 �F90 �'�,. �o SANITARY— `, SEWER EMERGENCY • 104'_ I ! .• rj I OVERFLOW `, '=\ \ •oz\•. , �--1 SYSTEM l� \ . \ \ �a�sraa° h.'''AG �a..�., ' '\ \ �\� p'� ___ ___ _ Z.�. ._' i - `�tirWilliI.t""'..'� /` '1 `'`fig, � `.. ``'�7 --� FUTURE 5TORM J ,1 "PROSED t I , \. `1 \ DRAIN R�CKERX'1 ! \ ; '� • 1 r Allig J \ STORM �r ( MAX h ) / / F. RESTRI DETENTION --T ur.) - f ` � R �'���, I I 1 d\ �1�1 7 F I� .1.1E Z. V. lb, o1P. ' �� S'FO�RM�D AIN• E TRACT in ; vo Yo LsJ y x -�J'� 1. _. _J l y • til t Am \ o ---476--- ! \ \ b C - 474 \, • ® D 1 2" REBAF 2-CELLED 3 8$'16r s 6„ W .,_._—V .-��. - 7_5 486—�.-- .� -- -- — O rETENTION/ y I ---- ''\ C DEI 28238 WETPOND r� I ti :CUNT) 1/2" REBAR O OF CORNER ,,� Urt t}< `� W/YPC "DEI 28238" 48 I. 0.1S X 30.0w OF • a. CORNER - a , 49 50 1 52 53 • • SHEET NO. 11 KING COUNTY AREA, WASP (RENTON QUADRANG / O I/ Amt. ISSAQUAH r2 M,. lO 1 680000 FEET I122 O�� 1%qi) II ill 1. 1[•. -I• • :_IL .. r "rii•�) i t 1 1{ ®--- • {.•�� - AgD u• • ... • 1 ••••• I[ 6-at'ir l al _ • . o • - 'AgC ■ ttir• t i.- .. r i ■ :: . �'_. � :•.9 i• i e.413• AgC• • .i..... • •BI1AB75• s n ,♦♦ • An • . • ••• n••• 'tea _a=q.,...1 == •• IIUY, ■ • !' •:�Trailgr 'IL • Ev8 Ii•; •s• ■■ '■ 'arkl•• •II 7 a• •BN 'neM • • ra; • e r• I I• • • •ii 3 • 424 -1 :, 71 --T t tl • .•• - 5a6 •�• • 1 GreenwoodCe ; �� "♦' • � I. e• t l-� r I 1 ' 180 000 '_-' e .■ :.. :`' ;ti • I�� 1'� —� • FEET r 'dim====p C • a' • ..-_1 _ •' ••. . ' aa0 II An A 1 . c ' 1 • • r� WEt. 'PIT Jrl1 q , O ' • •• • s• • z11 ? a t u L •: N. II , q •I i • '- '••r=aoadaaml yanv�e. • g 1 „® '� •15' 34 • Ev C -- — I AkF \i U• u II �•1 r. I �1 ••• II�y�'p ; • . A4 ••.....•••L_-- -- '� I ..�,..�' a •...• • • PY '..- • I AkF r•. k. 1 • e • . • • i .n •• / ••••••40•!•-.-•%- it 3 •✓• 11 • A�': 4 AkF 1PIp4,R��`' Py 1' o / •Vr, . I \)\ 1`\ _�� AgC `l�'i�.\//G,f c�'se `r I \ u• EVB . T- - _ / \1� ; AkF I J " r °,\.�r S/' •.•.���J/ AiiS _ AkF "<� `� • AgD _ w�`� /A�' __ I/�� e • .�=AkF---- 0 ,` `/ P ,,, . / `__. _ o Q , Ma W o 2 Ian- • ,,', -a ? r n ��. ' y 1CS u \ •1 a �fl e jil IT/ \•�iRh ej �0 as \\ AgC \.: ••,,`�••AkF I u \ \�_ av a1� I! I ``_� �r a •` upcl) AkF � ����` $. D �o�, `�;� C Park PY .eQue ��." `w �I u i ��r 169 - \"p ,'1 �° EvC AgC I s ��1 I �`°. -(�j JJJ I •... AgD ) AkF —. ,...___ 1 ,-�) I If � I� /--� �—--� I _I�i 1 KING COUNTY AgC AgD`� �� SOILS MAP BMA \ �� v_ 1u C� 428 AMBERWOOD AgB\t \PmB, i / • ur .• 27 T -- CORE DESIGN NO. 00059 .ss. --rtL . `• 4921 �' -�S 1n ,. -1 n ``�I `�F•a.AA \\ _it IT r( II 1 • 3.2.2 KCRTS/RUNOFF FILES METHOD—GENERATING GENERATING TIME SERIES • z :TA;BEIE'3.2 2; :iQUIV.4ENCE33ETWEEN:SCS:SOIL TYPES AND-KCRTS SOIL TYPES SCS Soil Type - SCS KCRTS Soil Notes Hydrologic Group Soil Group __Alderwood (AaB.AaC.AaD) C Till . Arents,Alderwood Material (AmB, AmC) C Till Arents, Everett Material.(An) B _ Outwash - 1 Beausite (BeC,BeD, BeF) C Till 2 Bellingham (Bh) D Till 3 Briscot(Br) D Till 3 ,. Buckley(Bu) • D Till 4 Earimont(Ea) D Till 3 Edgewick(Ed) C 'till 3 - Everett(EvB, EvC, EvD, EwC) NB Outwash 1 Indianola(InC, InA,InD) . ... _ . A. . . Outwash 1 Kitsap (KpB,KpC, KpD) C Till Klaus(KsC) C Outwash 1 Neilton (NeC) A Outwash. 1 Newberg (Ng) B Till 3 Nooksack (Nk) C Till 3 Norma (No) D Till 3 Orcas (Or) D Wetland Oridia(Os) D Till 3 Ovall (OvC, OvD,OvF) C Till 2 Pilchuck(Pc) C Till 3 Puget(Pu) D Till 3 Puyallup(Py) B Till 3 Ragnar(RaC, RaD, RaC, RaE) B . Outwash 1 Renton (Re) D Till . 3 Salal (Sa) C Till 3 Sammamish (Sh) D Till 3 Seattle (Sk) D Wetland Shalcar(Sm) D Till 3 Si(Sn) C Till 3 Snohomish (SO, Sr) D Till 3 Sultan (Su) C Till 3 Tukwila(Tu) D Till 3 Woodinville(Wo) D Till 3 Notes: 1. Where outwash soils are saturated or underlain at shallow depth(<5 feet) by glacial till,they should be treated as till soils. 2. These are bedrock soils, but calibration of HSPF by King County DNR shows bedrock soils to have similar hydrologic response to till soils. 3. These are alluvial soils,some of which are underlain by glacial till or have a seasonally high water table. In the absence of detailed study,these soils should be treated as till soils. 4. Buckley soils are formed on the low-permeability Osceola mudflow. Hydrologic response is assumed to be similar to that of till soils. 1998 Surface Water Design Manual 9/1/98 3-25 • SECTION 3.2 RUNOFF COMPUTATION AND ANALYSIS METHODS • KCRTS Land Cover Types KCRTS supports four land cover types:forest,pasture,grass,and impervious. These cover types shall be applied as specified in Table 3.2.2.0(below). • =r<t , TABLE':3 2 2 C:'?KCRTS,COVER.GROUPS AND.AREAS OF.:AOLICATION KCRTS APPLICATION Cover Group Predevelopment P Post-Development Forest All forest/shrub cover, irrespective of All permanent(e.g., protected by age. covenant or SAO designation) onsite forest/shrub cover,irrespective of age, CO 0 76 planted at densities sufficient to ensure 80%+canopy cover within 5 years. Pasture All grassland, pasture land,lawns,and Unprotected forest in rural residential �,�-cultivated or cleared areas, except for development may be considered half 40% V a'' lawns in redevelopment areas with pasture,half grass. predevelopment densities in excess of 4 DU/GA.. • Grass Lawns in redevelopment areas with All post-development grassland and predevelopment densities in excess of landscaping and all onsite forested land 4 DU/GA.. not protected by covenant or SASA designation (except in rural areas as noted above). Wetland All delineated wetland areas(except All delineated wetland areas(except cultivated/drained farmland). cultivated/drained farmland). Impervious)�) All impervious surfaces, including All impervious surfaces,including heavily compacted gravel and dirt compacted gravel and dirt roads, parking roads,parking areas,etc.,and open areas,etc.,and open water bodies, water bodies (ponds and lakes). including onsite detention and water quality ponds. (1) Impervious acreage used in KCRTS computations should be the effective impervious area (EIA). This is the gross impervious area multiplied by the effective impervious fraction (see Table 3.2.2.E,p.3-28). Non-effective impervious areas are considered the same as the • surrounding pervious land cover. The following four factors were considered in specifying the above land cover types to be used in hydrologic analysis with KCRTS: • Cover types are applied to anticipate ultimate land use conditions. For example,probable clearing of woodland after development is nominally complete suggests that the post-development land use be specified as grassland(either pasture or grass)unless the forest cover is protected by covenant. • In areas of redevelopment,there are often significant changes between the predevelopment and post- development efficiencies of the drainage system. For example,in conversion of low density residential areas to higher density land use,impervious areas prior to redevelopment may not be efficiently connected to a drainage system(e.g.,downspouts draining to splash blocks,ditched instead of piped roadway systems). These problems are addressed by defining an"effective impervious ' fraction"for existing impervious areas and by generally requiring predevelopment grasslands to be • modeled as pasture land. 9/1/98 1998 Surface Water Design Manual 3-26 SECTION 3.2 RUNOFF COMPUTATION AND ANALYSIS METHODS A • .! • FIGURE 3.2.2.A RAINFALL REGIONS AND REGIONAL.SCALE FACTORS ST1.0/ • ST 1.1 ST 1.0 LA 0.8 LA 0.9 LA 1.0 LA 1.2 . ''''' � •ys•; _ II�Q•I eEAni;' <r ' MNv� �SNONOrISN COUNTY ;�:.T;�_!�:i3 '{'�)\'.'; 1 .a l;A\\yr ,yo y: •.. tia JUNO COUNTY • yr•:...., 3r.1 YS OF{Ilfi •'`!r"nfl ,`_I'�t y\r, , .Mg ..^.� �. ....52] e. :i' o Z:' or .v 43 ! ' !▪ to r; +� d 44,1 .'`3 - '7 MEN,41 / ▪ %' >'j.-44•I { ON E • i $ Y tr s ff���''�//'rr�� d. "f ?a' t /is Fr` �{ 52oti AI. • r 'Pi , 20] ... ! ,„• •F , {, r r R c .j.: ti. J' Vf IAr • ..'Si4�' �;;•;a>'•y.+tilB¢7,:.:`al�s�iu^, :ii� ,�,�z.:.t: d«d' �o .r7 .! ip_.,s4-0,-iti, "....,1/4, 2 3 • ;.Gkv �•r v�ir•, • � r•^s li[nee0.'{f .• w .. .. :.4.s,q;4.„.7:g. ."...r i i: 4 4,1t, .:.:Lf' A .•'% ' ''''' '-''...4'r-1-'‘ • A , :"::.'"'',- .;:i•,',▪ ''' •,' "A"- 4r•ll% - . ''::•fEl'•,....4* - „ 05 ‘,,i,...1.LI- ., forr."-Nzs ,cr---7‘,.. •:„,. .._,.:.°r 1.:,•.j;.e4Y sl 1 .1 n[poM ., ,'iw t• ` k.?r,asx"w'H: .R .r• +' �I,!►soo z'.0 . ',., j ,1r ` E"f+ .` 374 < "`rRlwb'Ytci7,5 ,C f r j A r .\ .....-.. M —'-•... '"r `� ; F LANDSBURG • .g+ • '..._tom'. ;" Fr ®ft� ,�a�wCGs ,,,,,,} ,5,,%i.'?ta,z.:. - r' I fry ' 1♦ •1,i .�.:YS y ...A«x 5. y 1 S �,g�� ;r^motr.:', e '. _'".•. ".s"r: s' �` :".•,tt.ors;.. p' r .i ' to-, t:Ali.,_.> `•"' .i, �,,,,'' r :, 1� C ,...• A Is' ST 1.1 ea.L <99�q Q `I�S'rF'r 663' f I d 0illi 0,..... `IORCN I'`1 ?IKINO'COUNTY° .1 PIGN CZ COUNTY I i ST1.0 • f . +jay! ST 1.0/ :. --Y. Rainfall Regions and LA 0.8 . Regional Scale Factors LA 0.9 '1 Incorporated Area - - - LA 1.0 LA 1.2 ...c• River/Lake Major Road • • • 9/1/98 1998 Surface Water Design Manual 3-22 Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:0005/existina.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- Flow Frequency Analysis Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob (CFS) (CFS) Period 0.310 2 2/09/01 18:00 0.438 1 100.00 0.990 0.095 7 1/05/02 16:00 0.310 2 25.00 0.960 0.252 3 2/28/03 3 :00 0.252 3 10.00 _0 ciao 0.017 8 3/24/04 19:00 0.245 4 5.00 0.800 0.146 6 1/05/05 8:00 0.224 5 3.00 0.667 0.245 4 1/18/06 20:00 0.146 6 2.00 0.500,,. 0.224 5 11/24/06 4:00 0.095 7 1.30 0.231 0.438 1 1/09/08 . 9:00 0.017 8 1.10 0. 091 Computed Peaks 0.396 50.00 0.980 • Developed Conditions The developed site will consist of 18 single-family residences with associated roadway and utilities The impervious area was calculated using the criteria in the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual page 3-27 which states that 4000sf of impervious per lot should be assumed. All other impervious surfaces were measured by a planimeter. D. Impervious Area Delineation Onsite road and sidewalk 34,700 sf Impervious area of lots (4000sfk 19 lots) 76,000 sf Total impervious area 110,700 (2.54 acres) The input used for the KCRTS analysis is summarized in the table below: DEVELOPED CONDITIONS Total Area=4.70 acres (99102dev) GROUND COVER AREA(acre) Till-Grass (Landscaping) 2.16 Impervious 2.54 Onsite developed conditions flow frequency analysis: PEAK FLOW RETURN (CFS) PERIOD 1.66 100 year 0.978 25 year 0.976 10 year 0.856 5 year 0.815 3 year 0.809 2 year 0.673 1.3 year 0.641 1.1 year ) . Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series Fi1e:OOQidevelopg tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- Flow Frequency Analysis Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob (CFS) (CFS) Period 0.809 6 2/09/01 2 :00 1.66 1 100.00 0.990 0.641 8 1/05/02 16:00 0.978 2 25.00 0.960 0.976 3 2/27/03 7:00 0.976 3 10.00 0.900 0.673 7 8/26/04 2 :00 0.856 4 5.00 0.800 0.815 5 10/28/04 16:00 0.815 5 3 .00 0.667 0.856 4 1/18/06 16:00 0.809 6 2 .00 0.500 0.978 2 10/26/06 0:00 0.673 7 1.30 0.231 1.66 1 1/09/08 6:00 0.641 8 1.10 0.091 Computed Peaks 1.43 50.00 0.980 B. Detention Routing Calculations The detention/water quality facility will be a combination water quality and detention pond. The facility will be designed according to the Sept. 1998 KCSWDM. The detention portion of the pond will be sized according to a Level 1 Analysis (Conveyance Protection) using the KCRTS software. The attached printouts show that the required live storage is approximately 28,300 cf. The volume of the preliminary pond shown on the preliminary grading and utility plan is at least the required volume. Retention/Detention Facility Type of Facility: Detention Pond Side Slope: 3.00 H:1V Pond Bottom Length: 83 .45 ft Pond Bottom Width: 41.72 ft Pond Bottom Area: 3482 . sq. ft Top Area at 1 ft. FB: 9284. sq. ft 0.213 acres Effective Storage Depth: 5.00 ft Stage 0 Elevation: 472.00 ft Storage Volume: 28296. cu. f 0.650 ac-ft Riser Head: 5.00 ft Riser Diameter: 12 .00 inches Number of orifices: 2 Full Head Pipe Orifice # Height Diameter Discharge Diameter (ft) (in) (CFS) (in) 1 0.00 1.72 0.180 2 3 .60 1.50 0.072 4.0 Top Notch Weir: None Outflow Rating Curve: None Stage Elevation Storage Discharge Percolation Surf Area (ft) (ft) (cu. ft) (ac-ft) (cfs) (cfs) (sq. ft) 0.00 472.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.00 3482. 0.02 472.02 70. 0.002 0.011 0.00 3497. 0.04 472.04 140. 0.003 0.015 0.00 3512. 0.05 472.05 175. 0.004 0.019 0.00 3519. 0.07 472.07 246. 0.006 0.022 0.00 3534. 0.09 472.09 316. 0.007 0.024 0.00 3550. 0.11 472.11 388. 0.009 0.026 0.00 3565. 0.13 472.13 459. 0.011 0.029 0.00 3580. 0.14 472.14 495. 0.011 0.031 0.00 3588. 0.24 472.24 857. 0.020 0.040 0.00 3664. 0.34 472.34 1228. 0.028 0.047 0.00 3741. 0.44 472.44 1606. 0.037 0.054 0.00 3819. 0.54 472.54 1992 . 0.046 0.059 0.00 3898. 0.64 472.64 2385. 0.055 0.065 0.00 3977. 0.74 472.74 2787. 0.064 0.069 0.00 4057. 0.84 472.84 3197. 0.073 0.074 0.00 4138. 0.94 472.94 3615. 0.083 0.078 0.00 4219. 1.04 473.04 4041. 0.093 0.082 0.00 4302 . 1.14 473.14 4475. 0.103 0.086 0.00 4385. 1.24 473.24 4918 . 0.113 0.090 0.00 4468. 1.34 473.34 5369. 0.123 0.093 0.00 4553. 1.44 473.44 5828. 0.134 0.097 0.00 4638. 1.54 473.54 6296. 0.145 0.100 0.00 4724. 1.64 473.64 6773 . 0.155 0.103 0.00 4810. 1.74 473.74 7258. 0.167 0.106 0.00 4897. 1.84 473 .84 7752. 0.178 0.109 0.00 4985. 1.94 473.94 8255. 0.190 0.112 0.00 5074. 2.04 474.04 8767. 0.201 0.115 0. 00 5164. 2.14 474.14 9288. 0.213 0.118 0.00 5254. 2.24 474.24 9818. 0.225 0.121 0.00 5345. 2.34 474.34 10357. 0.238 0.123 0.00 5436. 2.44 474.44 10905. 0.250 0.126 0.00 5529. 2.54 474.54 11463. 0.263 0.128 0.00 5622. 2.64 474.64 12030. 0.276 0.131 0.00 5715. 2.74 474.74 12606. 0.289 0.133 0.00 5810. 2.84 474.84 13192. 0.303 0.136 0.00 5905. 2.94 474.94 13787. 0.317 0.138 0.00 6001. 3.04 475.04 14392. 0.330 0.140 0.00 6098. 3.14 475.14 15006. 0.345 0.143 0.00 6195. 3.24 475.24 15631. 0.359 0.145 0.00 6293 . 3.34 475.34 16265. 0.373 0.147 0.00 6392 . 3 .44 475.44 16909. 0.388 0.149 0.00 6491. 3.54 475.54 17563 . 0.403 0.152 0.00 6591. 3 .60 475.60 17961. 0.412 0.153 0.00 6652 . 3.62 475.62 18094. 0.415 0.153 0.00 6672. 3.63 475.63 18161. 0.417 0.155 0.00 6682. 3.65 475.65 18295. 0.420 0.158 0.00 6703 . 3.66 475.66 18362. 0.422 0.161 0.00 6713 . 3.68 475.68 18496. 0.425 0.166 0.00 6733. 3.69 475.69 18563. 0.426 0.171 0.00 6743. 3.71 475.71 18699. 0.429 0.175 0.00 6764. 3 .72 475.72 18766. 0.431 0.177 0.00 6774. 3.74 475.74 18902. 0.434 0.179 0.00 6794. 3.84 475.84 19586. 0.450 0.188 0.00 6896. 3.94 475.94 20281. 0.466 0.195 0.00 7000. 4.04 476.04 20986. 0.482 0.202 0.00 7103 . 4.14 476.14 21702. 0.498 0.209 0.00 7208. 4.24 476.24 22428. 0.515 0.215 0.00 7313 . 4.34 476.34 23165. 0.532 0.220 0.00 7419. 4.44 476.44 23912. 0.549 0.225 0.00 7526. 4.54 476.54 24670. 0.566 0.231 0.00 7633. 4.64 476.64 25439. 0.584 0.236 0.00 7742. 4.74 476.74 26218. 0.602 0.240 0.00 7850. 4.84 476.84 27009. 0.620 0.245 0.00 7960. 4.94 476.94 27810. 0.638 0.249 0.00 8070. 5.00 477.00 28296. 0.650 0.252 0.00 8137. 5.10 477.10 29116. 0.668 0.564 0.00 8248. 5.20 477.20 29946. 0.687 1.130 0.00 8360. 5.30 477.30 30788. 0.707 1.870 0.00 8473. 5.40 477.40 31641. 0.726 2 .660 0.00 8587. 5.50 477.50 32505. 0.746 2.950 0.00 8701. 5.60 477.60 33381. 0.766 3.210 0.00 8816. 5.70 477.70 34268. 0.787 3 .440 0.00 8932 . 5.80 477.80 35168. 0.807 3 .670 0.00 9049. 5.90 477.90 36078. 0.828 3 .880 0.00 9166. 6.00 478.00 37001. 0.849 4.070 0.00 9284. 6.10 478.10 37935. 0.871 4.260 0.00 9403. 6.20 478.20 38881. 0.893 4.440 0.00 9522. 6.30 478.30 39839. 0.915 4.610 0.00 9642. 6.40 478.40 40810. 0.937 4.780 0.00 9763 . 6.50 478.50 41792. 0.959 4.940 0.00 9884. 6.60 478.60 42787. 0.982 5.100 0.00 10007. 6.70 478.70 43793. 1.005 5.250 0.00 10130. 6.80 478.80 44813. 1.029 5.390 0.00 10253. 6.90 478.90 45844. 1.052 5.540 0. 00 10378. 7.00 479.00 46888. 1.076 5.670 0.00 10503 . Hyd Inflow Outflow Peak Storage Target Calc Stage Elev (Cu-Ft) (Ac-Ft) 1 1.66 ******* 1.16 5.20 477.20 29985. 0.688 2 0.81 ******* 0.58 5.10 477.10 29144. 0.669 3 0.98 0.25 0.25 5.00 477.00 28295. 0.650 4 0.86 ******* 0.24 4.73 476.73 26127. 0.600 5 0.98 ******* 0.23 4.54 476.54 24649. 0.566 6 . 0.82 0.15 0.15 3 .55 475.55 17618. 0.404 7 0.64 ******* 0.13 2.44 474.44 10884. 0.250 8 0.67 ******* 0.11 1.88 473.88 7971. 0.183 C. Water Quality Volume Calculations Based on the location of the site, "Basic Water Quality Treatment"is required for sizing the wetpond. The required volume of dead storage will be designed per KCSWDM Section 6.4.1.1. The following variables were used in the calculation: Volume Factor(f) =3 Rainfall=0.039 feet or 0.47 inches Where A;= area of impervious surface=2.54 Acres= 110,700 sf Atg= area of till soil covered with grass=2.16 Acres=94,090 sf. Vr=[0.9A; + 0.25Atg] x (R112) Vr=[(0.9)(110,700) + (0.25)(94,090)]0.039 =4803 CF Vb=f*Vr=3(4239.5)=. 14,409 CF The volume provided in the pond shown on the preliminary grading and utility plan is at least this required amount. 70 , co-/ so ;IF:41 ( 14 'Iva& _ _ till Oh) Christopher Brown QS Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. 8. 'AI (Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206)722-1910 fax (206) 722-1909 AMBERWOOD = ,-• ', •Traffic Impact Analysis L.,:• , _ - • City of Renton _ . • . • ,,.: • : • King County Prepared for Amberwood LLC csiAkti,.;-2 ttrA braft August 26, 2000 g 0 0 0 A;frfi cc 4:V.4:;;;73.4,'Y• [EXPIRES • Traffic Engineers Co' Transportation Planners • • • • AMBER•WOOD Traffic Analysis TABLE OF CONTENTS -Purpose - T. Location 3: .. . .. Scope - 5. Adjacent Land Uses 5. Street System.;. -. .:.. .'5. Transit -6. Project Phasing ... r 6. Traffic Characteristics - 6. Trip Generation - • - 7. . Horizon Year Traffic . 9. Traffic Assignment 9. Year 2002 Traffic Forecast 9. __ _.Cppacity Analysis 0 13. Commentary 15. Adverse Consequences , 16. " Mitigation Measure's 17. Conclusions • ' . .. 17. LIST OF FIGURES - 1. Vicinity Map . . 2. . . 2. Site Plan 4. 3. Current Traffic Volumes 8. 4. 2002 Traffic Volumes Without Project 10. 5 Traffic Assignment 11. 6. Year 2002 Volumes ,Projects Completed 12. LIST OF TABLES • I Trip Generation 7. II Level of Service Definitions 13. III Levels of Service 15. Christopher brown fn A88ociate8 9688 Rainier Ave. 8. (Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 222-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909 AMBERWOOD • TRAFFIC STUDY.3.: for a 19 Unit Single Family Residential Development in the City of Renton Purpose Briefly, the purpose of this traffic study-'is to'obtain current volume data on the adjacent arterial street system within the'City of Rentbn!and environs-that will servo.a proposed 19-lot residential subdivision and to derive a traffic forecast for the horizon year of development, in this case for the year 2002, so that an assessment of potential traffic impacts can be made and, if significant, appropriate traffic mitigation measures identified. For reference, the site is depicted on the Vicinity Map, Figure 1. The traffic analysis includes the gathering of current traffic volume data at those key location expected to be impacted by site generated traffic. In addition, other projects in the area that may be expected to come on line in the same time interval, and whose traffic is also expected to use the same arterial system, are identified and their respective traffic components are added to the forecast baseline traffic volumes so that a worst case that is inclusive of their data is produced. It may be noted that the arterial street traffic volume data over the p.m. peak hour is the typical "design hour" data since it contains home based Christopher brown Cn Associates -1- 9688 Rainier Ave. 8. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 'Z22-1910 Fax (206) 222-1909_) i . Is AY mlUt I E . C' 1 E VI 3S LAB C N n c N make °oz►t vtao', _ 37—Y 4 ra z ref 3S AV H169T ,`�'- NAME • 111:1111'o 1, Marmiiiii -a to, or 35 AY Nlf9t a 3S ray _ ,„2 , li mart - E.- � O : • 3 _•AY .R�'- X 1 aAv N, -�-�"V7, tom/ 1r ,I,- J •f E. b t !_? Tmitts ,I to AY H1 .I9T• i - ry ., S DI AV H19ST I 3t n 8I t,Xa n". Iv a.r a 1 a°"tat SSY1M^ a 4\ • AY SSI 4 '- :_•1 ,,,II�8� �e3'H ..•J d'N199T h- _,e t tt El • S/t 1 3S AY N1KI_ v - Sf7 t L._ ,•r ,, t. a ��4 iittft• • g. 3S AYluht t tll t • ' a— S. IS 1Y 411101 , .1• iet ice.. tt _, LI N,AYIt3• ,. v, . - - '_1$�AY ii a N19►1 Y7:�=Yj �.c_._'_^I- ^•' - '+I.',' ^, I 91 n 1_�.�^,101Ct ' "M/r..MI._ J r . �A . .. - 1S er.:4 ,.Y m n L' El S 'W'I Hl►YI x H n 35 AY .e 71. �, , 'I 4 ,,•. —_..SAY2211 ; ,i. :t ...1°PkAl ..,t IC !ni.' _1 I• _ ,may, - (• f .'"".• ; W, 4 (1I �I ILL § 2 ._I _C=-g ,. 15 ,'r +,iy 1i ._ i -.:>.:. -7 . -�._" .rod, III =P' c::: :' „ is r -' .,/ _. x - I' •'t: vw 1. -'1', r S A,„,,Y NLNEj 3S y .'. ., S - •ta` :I' S • " .. �r '''-i1 'IP. I rt , .:....,..:,2.- . s,t, , ,,, ...... - CO As fell i ,nt ,.....7.v. __0401,, ✓ �, 71 •• .\. 1. .,, _ +. .,`,°3 (. 3S AV NISEI - —- \ , ,er �' '_ :e eye o tf II jam, c4u �F \ 1 a ^3'�'<�/liTal'►� +•�t41 �" 4SY g ' •.� 15, 5� hr ', ' ,�' C•• 11 /AV rtOq I AV NORMilli AI�'I5,,, 1 ,'t ., �://i't.:;i�. ,_ „I -• usn St <( 3S AY NOI I , ..(:,,,• .:J�N' '•tti , 1 1S 1e S56°° : ::: 4 '� �'A..t- m 4. �tt 4 v.lrsa •t x "'•L-1"ei: 11 . , . , ■� 3.. b•►/*!�/�,� 1, '�S".1 iacE /.rs ifii `o°t't is id N *mot 1� ` t - .tart �l� `T• M NIIAt �t.r ..w Y 'rM: �•^ A., r 'b'I�tt4� g 1,0 #b1•R �:wl� C •Yhr AAA U (1 ^ .1 n '' "a t. _ , ,..„ 4, ,- ul, -�rst ",.. 1 yY .. . , • ;_ 1•1 1 .` i ,N cY A '�� ■,s sr- .0 t 'rJ ,,, .,...wit drir: v t M M T. Ina AQ • gW ;LL�Avot� eb C _a AY HMI FIGURE 1 Vicinity Map C Christopher Brown (1 Associates Vicinity Map 9688 Rainier Ave. 8. 8cattier WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1910 -2- work trips, school, shopping and social-recreation travel as well. It tends to be the:highest:peak hour of the day and is thus used for the worst case assessment. • In-addition, the study identifies the appropriate background growth factor for including non-site specific traffic growth up to the horizon year of `2002 in accordance-with-the recommended practice'of the-Institute'of Transportation Engineers; (ITEY published in-TraTc Access and Impacts Studies for Site Development, August, 1988. The study'assigns traffic to:the network and continues with an analysis of current and future levels of service (LOS) based on the full development in concert with both background traffic and other projects of record that are expected to be completed in the same time frame. _ - _ Location More particularly, the site is located on,the,east side of the 218 unit single. family residential:development of'-Maplewood. This large plat extends from SE 128th Street/NE 4th Street southerly to about SE 136th Street and from 148th Avenue SE to the west side of Amberwood. Amberwood, in turn, is also located on the south side of SE 128th Street/NE 4th Street with its eastern border becoming a proposed local collector street that may be called 152nd Avenue SE. The south side of Amberwood is approximately in line with SE 130th Street, if such a street existed. The site layout is depicted on Figure 2. This figure also shows the (half width) proposed residential collector street linking the site to the north with SE 128th Street/NE 4th Street. Internally, about half a block to the south, Amberwood is linked to the internal streets that will be constructed through Maplewood. The street through Maplewood will likely be named SE 129th Street. For reference purposes a copy of the Maplewood Site Plan, by TP&E, is included in the appendix. The Amberwood site is also noted on this plan. Christopher Brown CS A88oc ate8 _3_ 9688 Rainier Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909/ _ .r.=. - - _—i--- - - .-6L4.=i,i y .I f '7.17' l � ° 7;/i or ibeOf ikel fr. 3 H FUTURE SE 129th STREET —11 to I "MAPLEWOOD" . , , -.... 1 PRELIMINARY I 0 fP 'j#,�+tr.,• ' ° 1 3= /let sP 'fact +p I NOTE: Plat drawing �— I shows::-20 . lots . ________ This is to be revised to . I a —~—'_ 19 lots . 7 1 00, n 13 _________f 67•F sr 1 - d4s1 op > •tiNb 1 tot -OF ti n lean; 4012- fp I 1G I + 4' �� . �' • OF FIGURE 2 'rl K Christopher brown (n Associates Site Layout 9688 Rainier Ave. 8. 8eattic, WA 98118-5981 \ (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1910 -4- Scope= _- _ For the purposes,of Allis,study the scope of the project considers a- 191ot subdivision; Additonahy,.it:is also°,assumed that the road network of. Maplewood is completed at the time of site occupancy so that traffic access via the neighboring street network is possible.. ,‘ . , The key intersections expected to be impacted by site traffic include 138th, 144th;•148th'and 156th Avenue-SE.‘ :.. : - .., Adiacent Land Uses ,i,.:r ; ,° , The adjacent land uses are all single family residential developments. The only significant non-residential land use is a fire station located on 156th Avenue SE near the southeast corner of the property. Commercial (shopping) areas are located to the west near/at Duvall Avenue/138th Avenue SE,..:As a residential development the site is not in conflict with existing and proposed land uses. Street System The adjacent arterial street system serving the site is NR 4th Street/SE 128th Street. This is a five lane arterial from about a block east of 144th Avenue SE. To the east it is a 4-lane arterial with.a posted speed limit of 45 mph. The speed limit is reduced to 35 mph as it approaches Duvall Avenue/138th Avenue SE. The approach roads to this aretrails, including 144th, 148th and 156th Avenue SE are all 2-lane roads. Christopher brown Cn Associates -5- 9688 Rainier Ave. 8. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206)722-1909} No-roads in the site vicinity have urban facilities such as curbs, gutters or sidewalks. Full actuated traffic signals, with opposing`left turn channelization on NE 4th'Street/SE 128th Street, are located at Duvall Avenue/138th Avenue SE, and,144th Avenue SE and 156th Avenue SE The traffic signal at a 144th Avenue SE/Jericho Avenue will likely be modified-to accommodate the proposed plat Of. "4.77 Court" which will, when it is built, gain access via a new north intersection approach-street. Transit.- .• - -- Metro (Sound Transit) operates route 111 along NR 4th Street/SE 128th Street. Over the peak hour bus headways are at half hour intervals. Project Phasing The project will be accomplished in a single phase with completion and occupancy expected in the year 2002 or toward the end of 2002. Traffic Characteristics Current (mid-June) peak hour traffic data was obtained in the field over the p.m. peak hour under sunny and dry conditions. No adverse traffic operations were observed that might skew the data. In addition, peak hour traffic volumes for the intersections of 148th and 156th Avenues SE were obtained from the traffic study prepared by TP&E for Maplewood. Since -6- Chri&topher brown CAS Associate& 9688 Rainier Ave. 8. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909� the TP&E data was two years old it was updated to the year 2000 with growth-factors derived from the data at the Duvall Avenue/NE 4th Street intersection. The growth factors are 2.2 percent on NE 4th Street/SE 128th Street and 0.13 percent on 156th, 148th, and 144th Avenues SE.= Peak hour traffic observations did not show significant truck (heavy) vehicle operations nor much;pedestrian traffic along this arterial. Grade, geometric approach, truck and pedestrian data,is noted in the : appended capacity computations. Figure 3 shows the current volumes. Trip Generation Trip generation for the single family residential development is based on I.T.E. Land Use Code (LUC) 210, Single Family Detached Housing. The trip production, based on the average rate method due to-the small.scale of ; the development, is shown in Table I. TABLE I Trip Generation, Time Interval Traffic Volume A.W.D.T.* 182 Trips/day A.M. inbound . 3 veh./hour A.M. outbound 11 veh./hour P.M. inbound 12 veh./hour P.m. outbound 7 veh./hour * Average Weekday Daily Traffic Christopher brown CS Associates -7- 9688 Rainier Ave. 8. (Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909/ — a) - W Q '‘‘ 4 4 • N 156th Avenue SE N i . ,.. t' Future Access LEGEND --— ~ �� I )Oooc -Average Weekday `1.=. ' p 152rid Avenue 'SE Traffic Volume w , o (1) 7 P.M. ' Peak Hour M ` �' Traffic Volume I �+: -48 th Avenue SE. f ( ,,a', ob ; : ' _ ___ 7.7tx__________ .i ,__I ,,e ' •° o _ CA tkri I CD , F-60) richo Ave. NF. 0 0 .‘17. 7 144th Avenue SE t 4ti� o'�� 0 raeI1' a . ya tx� < ti� 10 1,0 VI 2/ 138th Avenue SE/Duvall Avenue ti FIGURE 3 Current Traffic Volumes Chriatophcr brown (?S Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. 8. -8- / (Seattle. WA 98118-5981 ( / (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909 Horizon Year Traffic .- As. doted earlier, the horizon year is taken at 2002. From the 1988-98 10- year historical data published by King County at Count Station 3042, located at SE 128th Street at 144th Avenue SE, the annual compound rate of growth was found to be 2.2 percent per year. On the minor street approach it was 0.13 percent per year. • 16riz6n year traffic also includes separate traffic generated by both plats of,"4.77 Court" and "Maplewood' which are commonly referred to as ro ects _of record. PJ , . Figure 4,.'2002 Traffic VolumesVoliiinei Without Project shows schematically the forecast data-except for;the two plats of "4.77 Court" and "Maplewood": which are included later. Assignment;. _ ` . •.:, The traffic assignment for this'project is based on the same assignment used for the plat of "Maplewood". That plat's traffic distribution was based on an EMME/2 computer run conducted by King County. The EMME/2 run is included in the Appendix for reference. As an adjacent plat it is a suitable model for "Amberwood". The percentage distribution is shown on Figure 5, Traffic Assignment. This figure also shows the traffic assignment,for the previously noted two projects of record, "4.77 Court" and "Maplewood". Year 2002 Traffic Figure 6, 2002 Volumes, Projects Completed, shows the forecast traffic _9_ Chri&topher brown (n ABsociate8 9688 Rainier Ave. 6. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 222-190 at - co • cn " o° . . • 156th Avenue SE 11 cn p Future Access LEGEND 152nd Avenue SE XXXX Average Weekday :;::, :N_;-- o._I Traffic Volume ° P..M. Peak Hour - - i `� Traffic Volume 8th Avenue -Skl: - i. 1i . _.-• , , • .... e" 6 .E \is . -, . •.I. .. -: .aK.; op'. - .:. ll , "'1. • 0Fs • fig, ) 1,%3, I: -4;.y - : _ . .. • :1143 is _cho Ave. NE 6 /i0 0 144th Avenue SE _�ti� e . Ik.k/1:-;a -.D cp, e (31"` \ 'w . 0.4 0. Z/ 138th Avenue SE/Duvall Avenue �9 Ikl. rX'c' . N YV FIGURE 4 2002 Traffic Volumes Without Project -- - - ----- --• — ----- -- /,. Chri&tophcr brown (n A88oCiate. 9688 Rainier Ave. 8. -10- Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909 156th Avenue SE co N w � m —_ , cn ail / / \ Future Access LEGEND 'u'i, — ~ �O 152nd Avenue SE (000) Average Weekday -� . .Traffic Volume w r P.M. Peak Hour p Traffic Volume �►8th Avenue `SSE * - '4Z'9 - * N * Site Traffic �4 M ‘. - 1 y I r-1 , [(1Nrc- f .� co (4) 4.77 Court Traffic `, X Maplewood Traffic ! x I Distribution in 4- I Per-cent icho Ave. NEJ 11 . 144th Avenue SE :jj P-70 ' t 1‘ r , 1 o.. °1 ,°� I �` Note: Traffic distribution 1 based on "Maplewood" .1)0. �/.-/ impact analysis . � hN * 138th Avenue SE/Duvall Avenue . -T 26 ."'-` l'' • r *� 43) Includes adjacent projects of record. FIGURE 5 1 Traffic Assignment Christopher brown (1 Associates 9688 12ainier Ave. 8. -11- Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909 i 4-3 . a) • X 156th Avenue SE .61 0o N rzl 1,,, r(31 � n ti E.61 n \ Future Access . . LEGEND 4 I y(x Average Weekday _._ N q... . 152nd._..Avenue SE ::. Traffic Volume r7.1 � I i z a�i P.M. Peak Hour a) Traffic Volume 8 th Avenue ,SE E \V( ( cn ,;q, : .v��Qti.. I M , '64- ' ).: ‘ 0,3(iTA°\ I '' . I ill icho Ave. NE - 0 _ - \ 144th Avenue SE a '"?' ,),"C :). t` rkL/ ASti < /I'll/ /1,1A 4) a/ 138th Avenue SE/Duvall Avenue h-) (4 /),a` FIGURE 6 2002 Traffic Volumes, Projects Completed f ^` ChriBtophcr Brown es A88ociate8 9688 Rainier Ave. S. 1 -12- ( (Seattle. WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 max (206)722-1909 • demand and is used for capacity computations described next. The data of this figure includes background growth, the adjacent projects-of record and traffic from "Amberwood". Capacity Analysis The level of service (LOS) describes the quality of traffic flow. This ranges from the;best or highest level, "A," usually denoted..by an ability to select ones' own speed or the ability to ,change lanes or overtake":at will; -down,_Zo the lowest or worst level "F." This LOS is the lowest possible level and is one where traffic is severely constrained. It is usually denoted by "jam" conditions and attendant long:traffic delays. The precise definitions are noted,below. The definitions of Table II follow the 1994 Highway'Capacity Manual since the Transportation Research Board has not yet approved the available software for analysis. Programs implementing the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual , which will be released this fall, will be available soon after. - TABLE II . .. Level of Service Definitions Signalized Intersections Level of Service Delay Per Vehicle A Under 10 seconds B 10.1 - 20.0 seconds C 20.1 - 35.0 seconds. D 35.1 - 55.0 seconds E 55.1 - 80.0 seconds F Greater than 80 sec. -13- Christopher brown ig5 Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. 8. (Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 222-1909) continued from last page. TABLE II . Level of Service Definitions STOP Sign Controlled Intersections Level of Service Delay Per Vehicle A Under 10 seconds; B > 10.- 15 seconds, . . • > 15 - 25 seconds D > 25 - 35 seconds E ,: > 35 - 50 seconds- .F,, , > 50 seconds =Capacitycomputations were performed using the computer program HCS issued by the McTrans Center of the University of Florida and Signal 94 by Strong Concepts;:both under license to Christopher Brown, P.E. It might be noted that in many cases the new 1997 HCM methods, that now include both stopped delay as well as moving delay in the computational algorithms and with higher time thresholds, often do not lead to different analysis results. Accordingly, the 1994 methods are deemed adequate for this planning analysis. The analysis results are described in Table III. Note that the delays on the STOP controlled intersections, in this case at 14+8th Avenue SE and the new access street to the site from NE 4th Street/SE 128th Street, are noted below for only the worst case movement. Typically the is the minor leg's left turn onto the arterial. -14- \ Christopher brown Cf A88ociate8 9688 Rainier Ave. 6. I cattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909. -- - -- - - ... TABLE III _, - - --Levels of-Service-. _- _ Intersection Current 2002 2002 - - -..-- ----- Volumes - -.:W/Out With the _-_ Project Project & _ n - . 4__...�__. - Current—Geom.' NE 4th Street/Duvall Ave: T- C ',-_.-C _ ._:.._ C Intersection Delay, seconds _ 15.6 .' 16.4 18.5 sec.'s - —N 4th-Street/144th Avenue SE- B - -g :_-.- B _Worst VloYement Pelay,_seconds - _-_'7.6- _ _ - - =8.1 12.2 sec.'s•- - SE7128th-Street7144th Avenue SE C C C __:-=__Intersection Delay, seconds _ .r. :e _:...,.-16.9 '17.3 sec.'s. .. _ NE 4th Street/148th Avenue SE F._ __ F _-...._.-: ... _---F ..- -- Worst Movement Delay, seconds 77.0 - 106.8 718.9 sec.'s --- NE-4th•Street/152nd Avenue SE -NA -NA'- - - . E Worst Movement Delay,_ seconds _ 44.4 sec.'s _ Commentary The above analysis, up to the year 2002 with the "Maplewood" project's primary access via the project constructed south leg of the 148th Avenue SE intersection, indicates that it will operate at LOS 'F'. This assumes that the project will also construct a westbound left turn lane into 148th Avenue SE. Even with such an arterial widening program, LOS `F' will exist for STOP controlled movements. These tend to be for the northbound left Christopher Brown 0. ss Aociates -15- I 9688 Rainier Ave. S. / Seattle, WA 98118-5981 / (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 222-1909� turn from the site onto the arterial. Clearly, there are some capacity issues that can only be resolved with signalization. The TIA for the project did not disclose that kind of.mitigation requirement. Probably since signal _ 1 _ - --warrants may not exist,'althou h the_oor LO :.--may not--..._,. . ._.�.. _. g� _._ .,;I?�. ;-, valueswere tabulated._..-_._._,:- - For the small residential development under consideration, "Amberwood", _ „the intersection of the "half street improvements" noted on the preliminary: - -plat map of Figure 2,-identified as possibly 152nd Avenue SE on SE-128th Street,•the_LOS analysis uidicates that there is IIQ need for widening on-E-' = '= 4th Street/SE 128th Streetfor this development. This is because the -_ amount of traffic`that will be added at this new intersection is minor and .F the-LOS, for the worst-case-movement,is `E' ; _ ... In the future, the. extension_of_a center 2-way,�.le f t tarn lane:along the- _ arterial past 152nd Avenue SE and up to the signalized intersection of _:._ :_ . -1-56th Avenue SE,`essentially extending the system that is also to be ______"-____accomplished by "Maplewood" past its new intersection on 148th Avenue SE, maybe anticipated:: This will likely be done with traffic impact fees collected from various developments including "Amberwood" and .. .. : -- _ - _ - "Maplewood" that will, in the future, also gain access to the arterial system --via 152nd Avenue SE. Adverse Consequences As a small development with only moderate traffic volume increases the adverse consequences are can only be measured in terms of added delay. From Table III it will be seen that at the signalized intersections along NE 4th Street/SE 128th Street, the increases in delay range from a low of 0.2 seconds to a high of 4.1 seconds. These are not noticeable. However, at the STOP sign controlled intersection of 148th Avenue SE the added traffic appears to have a measurable effect since the delay is raised by some 600 seconds for the northbound left turn movement. While such a delay is large, note that it also presumes that none of the westbound peak hour traffic from "Maplewood" will divert from 148th Avenue SE and use, -16- Christopher brown Cn A88ociate8 9688 Rainier Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909 instead,-the signalized.intersection at 156th Avenue SE. Since that plat will have a road system that links it to 156th Avenue SE via SE 132nd Street, it.. is clear that plat traffic will divert to the signal. Accordingly, the theoretically.low LOS with its long delays as shown on Table III are most likely an overestimate. Mitigation Measures "The key mitigation measures for the plat of "Amberwood" include the linkage of the plat to "Maplewood" at what may be SE 129th Street and the -construction. of half street improvements linking the plat to NE 4th Street/ h SE 128t 'Street.r ' .. . The City of Renton...collects:gener'al�traffic impact fees at the rate of $75 _ per AWDT so that,a;fee of-$135650_for the anticipated 182 average -:- • weekday-trips"-generated by thc::plat--may be-anticipated. Conclusions - 1. The project-with 19-single.family_homes will generate about 182 trips per day with 14 in the morning peak hour and 19 in the evening peak. 2. Adequate levels of service exist along the arterial at its signalized intersections and none will be lowered below minimum thresholds. 3. A half street improvement will link the site to NE 4th Street/SE 128th Street. It will not require widening on the arterial for capacity related purposes. 4. The STOP controlled intersection of 148th Avenue SE will not meet signal warrants; an LOS 'F' is expected during peak hours. 5. The poor LOS at 148th Avenue SE will induce diversion to the signal at 148th Avenue SE so that the low LOS should not be a significant issue. 6. A traffic mitigation fee of $13,650 may be levied based on the AWDT of 182 trips. 17_ Chri&topher brown CS Associates // 9688 Rainier Ave. S. \\ Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909j Traffic Study APPENDIX Traffic Volumes, Current Field Data 1. NE 4th Street/144th Avenue SE _ 2.. . NE 4th Street/Duvall Avenue 3. 148th Avenue SE/SE 128th Street ---by.TP&E _ _ 4. 156th Avenue SE @ SE.128th Street by TP&E Trip Generation,LUC 210,ITE Data Sheet-AWDT .Trip Generation,.LUC.210,ITE Data Sheet-A.M. Peak Hour Trip Generation; LUC 210, ITE Data Sheet- P.M. Peak Hour Maplewood Site Plan Maplewood.EMME/2-Trip Distribution via King_County- • t1 it + - - j _ - Capacty Calculations- -- --- - • 1 0 I i Intersection ` - -` File No. Year -Page No. •; Current-Volumes,; , Duvall-Avenue/NE 4th Street AMB-C 1"P. 000 1. 144th Avenue SE/SE 128th Street- ' AMB-C2P -2000 - - 4 . 4 E-4thStreet/148th.Avenue SE- - - `- . AMB-C3P.HCO 2000 . -" 7._--.___ • 156th Avenue SE/SE 128th Street AMB-05P -2000 10:- • 2002 Without Developments Duvall Avenue/NE 4th Street AMB-H1P 2002 13. 144th Avenue SENSE 128th Street AMB-H2P 2002 16 . NE 4th Street/148th Avenue SE AMB-H3P.HCO 2002 19. 156th Avenue SEISE 128th Street AMB-H5P 2002 . 22. 2002 With Developments Duvall Avenue/NE 4th Street . AMB-P1P 2002 25. 144th Avenue SE/SE 128th Street AMB-P2P 2002 28 . NE 4th Street/148th Avenue SE AMB-P3P.HCO 2002 31. NE 4th Street/152nd Avenue SE AMB-P4P.HCO 2002 34. 156th Avenue SENSE 128th Street AMB-P5P 2002 37. -r_7C.Je-c-r -JC`'cXo ,4 ,-ice'• --j� DATE vr�47c 7 76 DAr e.- iNTEUSECTiCN Of : /�Y " . L` C AND ' _y_4f '/- 4 T IAA E yam' IC .S-'4-/ P = PEAK HOUR s ---L r�,c T N.�-- c.:1,1 I•=��:cc r,C x -"'`.1 r- t:rc:L _ �v TIM .Oyt've►t)ety , - _. -. I-- `. ._1-. d r1 :it_L.i ___t, ' 1 ' s: 1R .1l. 1Li - .S .II _ _.-- S_ I. R I I y --:',/ ' ' : -1 2 1'- 1' I15' 1 /3� I II :?-I 2 I I 6; /5'-' -`7 : 6 I' _ ' : I ?0_I ion _I 2' Tr 11 -II D .I ._ . .. :.. (:: 16,E 7 y-u^ q'/f l:_: -- I:2/01 /0.-7--1 1-1' /a"_ = 1 se- I. . g v_, _ _ . /rs s'6"7 _ '91 igt I // / C I 15' 9- r C cr?p,;_,-..r.../3.4_,r-::_:. ...712.J I/8 1 _7 -15-.6.1 1 sE _ _. r- Clc, - - /i --1 --1- /03 i I yy # - _ • l• .(yu c/5 121b // I I it/ I 130 , ti- 5 I I I I I II i rc'ird 12 1 I. I I i rehuti 's I I 1 I II 2 I I I I I II 2 414 I I I .9 I II 2- 1 i Gk I 2 1 12- I II 2 I '7 -Ty I I I II I 1-- 5- Qo 1I t %L. I / I 1 / 1 eft)e- I I / I I - I . I I_ I , ) �f I 1 I I I III , e. 1 2 I / 1 2- I II I I I I. I I II I I zi30 -5-3° , 11)1, 144-1 13b It. I IIlc/ 2/ I I ,31/71r lo-11 Io-5`( T 1S/1o ? I IIo/ ° KI 1 I I I I I II I TOTALS I I I I II of TOTALI I I 1 I II I1 1 1 imikv 2. 571 f fit . - - . . 1- :PT?'Cj.•_-r' .---- v'; , �-G _ .A I E CTIo e_ ZU(16 '/ � DAy - . • I N T E E S EC T I C K CF : / ' ' A N O -- e-,I/' ,,,,,Gc' TIME l/00 TC S 6 P = PSAX HOUR ' S.=m-',-^^%_;t'.0 il_AJ: .... ...". (=•.:, N.iii r"'÷:.: Cr r, 1 `:+iei T- L;r';G TIME I, LE i ; -� II .. I i ---._..-.. -. L.. .. . . R.: :.'.�I. L... „,�S- . � R. ..IC..:�.:� -: : :�-;�l I, R � L 5 R ,9 == 7/ '- -116d' /3- ..-3 I.i I1/y 19' II / I / s I lc) C 4 I Szi y/ - '/ I'' .. 12�a.-.1 - g_.- - I/y. 1.. S II .117 I - I•///. // s I ai -r�' /3.-. 4 ' I._/�) Ii'ic.. I 4- - I - 5 .6..... /3v /1 . -S ii 4/ 0 A �� 2 I /2 `� '/6/ �-q 15 I S �- �� 8 s5 p51- s/. - -so 1--.2 -o- / w3 il /1.6 . if --2. 4 .... /6__0 q • -GJ9- F/t 53(5-511." ‘3 12'/ I /6 I - I // - 14'2 2 / Y 9I • zi' " ?- I I I I I I I I I I Me/kb , l I /-t I ITI -1 I I I / I I - I t ,ir6,;k2Gv iI ' I I / I 1 I t6 . � rc, , I3 I I I I I I 2 y"V 1 I I I I 1I I n / ,s�Y $ 9 1 I ICI I 1 I M -c I �- I 11 1 I I I s I I I I ,' I I I Y / I I I' I I I I I I —` - .s 2,q- $ 159 I WW I /0 1 ` 12°5 ( 12/ 2'1- 4/2b y5 ��/ I 7frte . I •51- I f2(; I =C 1,0- I ; -/ 1, 19-i .3-' ,3/ cry c)Z I I I I I I I TOTS► L S i I I F I I I I 1 o{ ICIA .I 1 t_ 1 I I i I I I,_ I I J -1-Y:5--", /.p/;-4',IY;" 0‘-- C'.4/". (-)4 45:dr • • • 2 FC Traffic Count Consultants, Inc. 13623 184111 Avenue NI„ Woodinville, WA 98072 • Phone:(425)861-8866 FAX:(425)861-8877 : :u n _n i` --Vehicle Volume Summary — Intersection: 148th Ave SE @ SE 128th Ave Date of Count Th 2/12/98 Location: Renton - - - - - Checked By: Kg - Time From North on(SB) From South on (NB) From East on (WB) From West on.(ES) Interval �.;interval 1401kAve-SE_. a SE 128tti Ave SE 128th Ave Ending at T •L S I$^ T L S R T. L S R. T. —.-.L . ,_.i.. Total 4:15 P . . 0--- ---4-- - 0 ' 140 0 0 ' 0 0 0 161 2 ' 2 Ti 239 0 437 4:30 P 0 9 0 10. 0 0 0 0 0 0 139 ' 6 2' 9 244 0 417 4:45 P 0 14 0 13 0 0 0 0 1 0 154 8 4 10 275 0 474 5:00 P 0 5 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 141 3 2 8 295 0 458 5.15 P 0 13 0 12 0 0 0 0 1 0 155 3 1 16 245 0 444 5:30 P 0 11 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 132 6 2 19 293 0 472 5:45 P 0 2 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 149 4 0 16 259 0 438 ' 6:00 P 0 11 0 ' 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 145 7 0 22 265 0 460 6:15P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 6:30P 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:45P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ 7:OOP'' 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 .Total Survey 0 , 69 0 84 0 0 0 0 2 0 1176 39 , 13 117 2115 0 3600 4:30 P to 5:30 P Peak Hour Summary Approach 0 1 e3 1 0 1 42 01 0 1 0 1 0 2-.1 0 1582 1 20 9 1 53 1 1108 1 0 1848 0 602 1161 1848 %HV 0% PHF 0.79 n/a 0% 1% 1% n/a 0.93 _ 0.93 0.97 Legend: T=Number of heavy vehicles(greater than 4 wheels) L=Left-Turn S=Straight R=Right-Turn HV=Heavy Vehicles ' PHF=Peak hour Factor(Peak hour volume/(4'Highest 15 minutes)) Prepared For: T P& E TM98.77y • . 1 • • • • 2 • 1 Traffic Comte Con.wlla,Q4 IAC :-. - 13623 184th Ave NE,Woodinville,WA 98072 Phone:(425)861-8866 FAX:(425)861-8877 • Vehicle Volume Summary Intersection: SE 12oth St @ 156th Av.cSE Date of Count Thurs 2/12/98 Location: _ ..Renton _ -•Checked • lime From North on(SB) From South on(NB) From East on(WB) From West on(EB) Interval Interval Driveway 156th Ave SE SE 128th St SE 128th St Total Ending.aa .T: -. L. S • R T L S A T L S R T . L S...-. ...R 4:15 P 0 - 1` 0 _ 1 - 2- 44 - ---0 25 2 39 101 0 4 1 160 80 452 4:30 P 0 1 0 1 1 53 0 23 -1 - . 63-- --101 -0 1 0 161 85 488 4:45 P 0 046, 0 3 0 34 . 0 26 3 42 109 0 4 0 175 107 496 5:00 P 0 0 0 1 0 36 0 27 1 51 102 0 3 2 195 98 512 ' 5:15 P •0 0 0' 1 1•- 41 0 23 0 52 109 0 1 0 171 95 492 5:30 P r 0 0 0 0 0 38 0 21 0 53 103 0 2 0 171 113 499 5:45 P 0 0 0 0 0 47 0 22 0 84 93 0 0 0 184 99 489 6:00 P 0 0 0 0 0 59 0 22 0 52 100 0 2 0 105 78 506 6:15P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 6:30P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:45P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:OOP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , 0 � 0 0 0 0 Total Survey 0 2 0 7 4 352 0 189 7 416 B18 0 17 3 1392 755 3934 4:30 P to 5:30 P Peak Hour Summary Total 0 j o• 0 j 5 1 I 149 1 0 197 - 4 j 1 8 1 423 1 0 10 1 2 1 712 1 413 " 1999 Approach 5 248 821 1127 1999 %HV 0% Oal. 1% 1% 1% PHF 0.42 0.96 0.91- 0.96 0.98 • Legend: T=Number of heavy vehicles(greater than 4 wheels) L=Left-Turn S=Straight R=Right-Turn HV=Heavy Vehicles PHF=Peak hour Factor(Peak hour volume/(4'Highest 15 minutes)) Prepared For: TP&E • "]M9B 76r Single-Family Detached Housing (210) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday Number of Studies: 348 Avg. Number of Dwelling Units: 198 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50%.exiting _ Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit ... . Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 9.57 . 4.31 - 21.85 3.69 Data Plot and'Equation 30 000 Ul X c 20.000— W a m X �, U t . X • ip X m FII- 10,000 - '• , x X x -x x ,. •X 0 r 1 0 1000 2000 3000 X=Number of Dwelling Units X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T)=0.920 Ln(X)+2.707 R2=0.96 Trip Generation,6th Edition 263 Institute of Transportation Engineers Single-Family Detached Housing (210) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, • Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. .. . . . .. .... .. . Number of-Studies: -271 Avg. Number of Dwelling Units: 202 Directional-Distribution:"25e/0 entering, 75% exiting - Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation •0.75 0.33 - 2.27 0.90 • Data Plot and Equation a.00o c z00o— - .• O. X F- .m .1 m X X N X 1,000— x -• X X X X X • X X XX14 0 • J 1 i 0 1000 2000 3000 X=Number of Dwelling Units X Actual Data Pointe Fitted Curve - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: T=0.700(X)+9.477 R2=0:89 Trip Generation,6th Edition 264 Institute of Transportation Engineer. Single-Family Detached Housing (210) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a:: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Number of Studies: .294- Avg. Number of Dwelling Units: 216 _ ' ` Directional Distribution: 64%entering, 36% exiting Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate .. .- .- Range of Rates Standard Deviation - 1.01 0.42 - 2.98 1.05 Data Plot and Equation • 9,000 • X • • - X - - m c 2000— W a 1= x -. ea m m ' o, x m x x t,000 - x . X x 0 0 1000 2000 3000 X=Number of Dwelling Units X Actual Date Points Fitted Curve - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T)=0.901 Ln(X)+0.527 R2=0.91 Trip Generation,6th Edition 265 Institute of Transportation Engineers • MI • illirll IM - - - 11111, �� D vie 0 __ b C� --- R' © � A�! stiEe� �e�e �, �r WA, a y 42/421 ti i 1► ��®��4/ ;ol _ IIIIIMEIRII -iu A�toe® 10 ��• a • 7 7tit � Air r -RE.-132pd St AR.' /o! i - ' - -•i 3 i - Ter • 111111111111111111 . - - . •:•• _:.•:••. •0, tri a �/ i DoI if0 14 �� al - -• . . .V log � � C: .��■Po 1. .� - ir ap;, �� �o PP: im,,i1E's v .4 It (Ntz_ ,./*"" 41 0 1 L II 'tN• ,tit• ffiElth 2 MII:t ,�Qa^RQfietisis I. __ _ _ .0 = a _ / - c' SITE PLAN FIGURE ti- MAPLEWOOD 2 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS • tt Y SITE TRIP DISTRIBUTION • Erg ,E r .fn - LINKS: • t `+.,• THRESHOLD: iyyf,v � UPPER: 999999 \` • // • .\t / II ; ilk , 1*"."......... • Viiimi • • • ... ::: .. _ , i� �• f sir M • I • ,: r SCALE: 10 ,,--.1.=`-ti, '�, 80 i 100 11.. ' .7. •d •mom: d • ! 4041.3/14530.5 I I 5535/15650.8 EMME/E PROJECT: King Count. TCn 98-04-06 13:35 SCENARIO 4100: Site 98033001 Distribution. Parent Zan. 449 MODULE: 2.13 KINGCNTY. .at, KING COUNTY TRA FFIC MODEL TRIP DISTRIBUTION FIGURE 1 ii,.. MAPLEWOOD 6 • TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS • Amberwood Development 08/25/** Duvall Avenue NE/NE 4th Street . 09:37 :38 Current P.M. Peak Hour File AMB-C1P SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NQNCBD LOSTTIME 3.0 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATI.ON 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES .0 .0 ..0 .0 PEDLEVELS .0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0. 0 A BUSVOLUMES 0 _ 2 0 2 RIGHTTURNONREDS 35 20 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TB LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 23.1 39 420 209 526 10 22 2'1 17 48 1153 267 WIDTHS 12.0 12.0 12.0 11.0 24.0 12.0 .0 14.0 .0 .0 24 .0 12.0 LANES 1 1 1 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 UTILIZATIONS .0.0 .00 .00 .0.0 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0-0 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS 3.0 ..0 2.0 .0 1.0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 1.0 .0 PEAKHOURFACTORS .8.1 .89 .92 .71 .82 .63 .79 .76 .85 .86 .97 .87 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4 .0 4.0 4.0 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NSTOPFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 1568 1900 1431 1549 3762 334 0 1656 0 0 3724 1805 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 13 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET . 00 1 CYCLES 90 110 10 PEDTIME .0 0 GREENTIMES 35.01 21.26 21.73 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 3 12 4 EXCESS 0 - 1' • Amberwood Development 08/25/** Duvall Avenue NE/NE 4th Street 09:36:29 Current P.M. Peak Hour File AMB-C1P SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 13 ,Phase 1 ,--Phase 2.; . , Phase 3 - **/** + .-+ .*. - . + . _ ._ -. . . _ A • + + * . + : **** / \ <+,..+ *>. .... <+.- 0 - <++++ v ++++ **** v North <+ + +> ++++> , . , - ++++> 1 + + + ++++ . - ++++ + + + v v G/C= -. .389 G/C= .236 G/C= .241 G= 35.0" G= . 21.3" G= 21.7" Y+R= 4.0" . .. Y+R= 4.0". -. Y+R= 4 .0" OFF= .0% OFF=43.3% OFF=71.4% C= 90: sec - G= 78.0 'sec = 86.7% Y=12.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% MVMT TOTALS...-_--- -N Approach ---E Approach S Approach W Approach Int Param:Units . --RT ._ TH LT.-.-. RT . TH LT RT TH LT RT TH ,LT Total AdjVol: vph 242 -. 44- -457..-.266 - 673 - - 16 • -28 28 20 59 1248 307 3388 Wid/Ln:ft/# 12/1 12/1 .12/1 11/1 24/2 12/1 0/0 14/1 0/0 0/0 24/2 12/1 g/C Rqd@C:% 22 9 38 . 24 _. 22 ; _ 8 0 -.11 0 .0 38 23 g/C@E vph 1067 SV : 760 573 391 950 74 0 663 0, 0 1986 446 6910 Svc Lvl:LOS-_ A B C C C C+ B - - B C C+ Deg Sat:v/c .23 .06 .80 .68 .71 .19 .00 .12 .00 .00 .66 .69 .64 Avg Delis/v 5.9 16.7 31.5 35.4 32 .3 31.0 .0 17.3 .0 .0 16.0 35 .2 24 .0 Tot Del:min 6 3 60 39 91 2 0 5 0 0 87 45 338 # Stops:veh 23 7 101 60 153 3 .0 12 0 0 235 70 664 Max Que:veh 4 1 14 10 25 1 0 2 0 0 31 12 100 Max Que: ft 98 33 347 249 316 25 0 57 0 0 383 289 383 APPR TOTALS Int Param:Units N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Total AdjVol: vph 743 955 76 1614 3388 Svc Lv1:LOS B C B B C+ Deg Sat:v/c .57 .69 . 12 .66 .64 Avg Del:s/v 22.3 33.1 17 .3 19.7 24 .0 Tot Del:min 69 132 5 132 338 # Stops:veh 131 216 12 305 664 Max Que:veh 19 36 2 43 100 Max Que: ft 347 316 57 383 383 1i Amberwood Development 08/25/** Duvall Avenue NE/NE 4th Street 09:36:22 Current P.M. Peak Hour File AMB-C1P SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Dpprree of -S.atit�ration (v/c) .64 Vehicle Delay 15.6 Level of Service C+ Sq 13 1 Phase, 1 �'. . Phase 2 ' Phase 3 **/**** + + * + + + * + **** / \ <+ + *> <+ <++++ v ++++ A **** v North <+_ + +> ++++> ++++> + + ++++• ++++ + + + v v -G/c= 338.9 G/C 216 - . G/C= .241 G=` -3.5:'a7 G= 21.3," . G= 21.7" y+R=-4.0'". Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= .0% OFF=43.3% OFF=71.4% C=-90 -sec- G= 78.0 sec 86.7% Y=12.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% - Lane - Width/ g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L 90% Max Group 1 Lanes ' Reqd Used @C (vph) @E !Volume' v/c Delay I S Queue N Appr.oach 14 .6 B RT 12/1 1 .221 1 .681 1041 1067 1 242 1 .227 3.5 A 1 98 ft TH 12/1 .087 .400 675 760 44 .058 10.7 B 33 ft LT 12/1 .377 .400 495 573 457 .798 20.8 *C 347 ft S Approach 11.0 B ILT+TH+RTI 14/1 I . 111 I .400 I 581 I 663 I 76 I . 115 I 11.0 B 1 57 ftl E Approach 21.8 C RT 11/1 .238 .253 290 391 266 .680 22 .9 *C 249 ft TH 24/2 .225 .253 790 950 673 .708 21.5 C 316 ft LT 12/1 .084 .253 48 74 16 . 190 17 .2 C+ 25 ft W Approach 12.7 B I LT+RTI 12/1 .233 .247 1335 946 11446 986 1 307 I .688.658 I 22 .9 10.3 I *C 1289 ft 383 l i k • Amberwood Development 08/25/** 144th Avenue SE/SE 128th Street 09:52:04 Current P.M. Peak Hour File AMB-C2P SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Summary ofParameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA _ NONCBD LOSTTIME 3:0 ': LEVELOFSERVICE . C -S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters _ _...- APPLABELS' N ' E S w GRADES'' .0 .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 5 0 PARKINGSIDES _ NONE " `_ NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 _.. 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 2 0 2 RIGHTTURNONREDS _ 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH " LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 0-' 0 0 0 657 30 21 0 201 443 1315 0 WIDTHS . - - 0 .0 .0 .0 24.0 12.0 12.0 .0 12.0 .0 24 .0 .0 LANES ' -.__... 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 UTILIZATIONS -'- `.00 ' .00 - -.00 ._ 00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS .0- .0_ .0 .0 2.0 .0 4.0 .0 3.0 2.0' .0 .0 PEAKHOURFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .90 .75 .75 1.00 .87 .94 .91 1.00 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES REQCLEARANCES 4 .0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4 .0 4.0 4.0 4 .0 4.0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NSTOPFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 0 0 0 0 3711 122 1549 0 1752 0 3627 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET .00 1 CYCLES 90 110 10 PEDTIME . 0 0 GREENTIMES 20.79 61.21 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 9 11 EXCESS 0 i � . Amberwood Development _- 08/25/** 144th Avenue SE/SE 128th Street 09:51:28 Current P.M. Peak Hour File AMB-C2P SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation: of-Intersection Performance Sq 11 I Phase ' 1 • .I Phase•..2. - .I - _ **/**. i , Jr• - <++++ ++++. V North .- . <* +> ****> ..- . __- - - -. . ... . . - I :. , *. , +.. **** - *: +" V V. .2311 G/C= .680 I ' G= .-20-.8" G=, 61.2" Y+R= 4 0" Y+R= 4.0" OFF=-- .0% . OFF=27.5% _ -.. -C= 9OIsec G= 82.0 sec = 91.1% Y= 8.0 sec = 8.9% Ped= .0 sec = .0% MVMT TOTALS - N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Int Param:Units RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total AdjVol: vph 0 0 0 0 766 40 28 . 0 231 ' 495 1517 0 3077 Wid/Ln:ft/# O/0 0/0 0/0. 0/0 24/2 12/1 12/1 0/0 12/1 0/0 24/2 0/0 g/C Rqd@C:% 0 0 0 0 25 19 8 0 20 0 56 0 0 0 0 0 69 69 24 0 24 0 69 0 SV :C@E vph 0 0 0 0 2565 78 375 0 424 0 2507 0 5949 Svc Lvl:LOS A B+ C+ C B+ B+ Deg Sat:v/c .00 .00 .00 .00 .30 .48 .08 .00 .55 .00 .80 .00 .65 Avg Del:s/v .0 .0 .0 .0 5.7 24.9 26.7 .0 32.3 .0 11.3 .0 11.8 Tot Del:min 0 0 0 0 18 4 3 0 31 0 94 0 150 # Stops:veh 0 0 0 0 75 5 .5 0 50 0 349 0 484 Max Que:veh 0 0 0 0 12 1 1 0 9 0 31 0 54 Max Que: ft 0 0 0 0 150 25 27 0 223 0 389 0 389 APPR TOTALS Int Param:Units N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Total AdjVol: vph 0 806 259 2012 3077 Svc Lv1:LOS A C B+ B+ Deg Sat:v/c . 00 .31 .49 .80 .65 Avg Del:s/v .0 6.7 31.7 11.3 11.8 Tot Del:min 0 22 34 94 150 # Stops:veh 0 80 55 349 484 Max Que:veh 0 13 10 31 54 Max Que: ft 0 150 223 389 389 ' S Amberwood Development 08/25/** 144th Avenue SE/SE' 128th Street 09:51:23 Current P.M. Peak Hour File AMB-C2P SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Capacity Analysis Summary' Intersection Averages: ' Degree of Saturation (v/c) .65 Vehicle Delay 7.6 Level of Service B+ Sq .11;. j, phase 1 I Phase . 2 **/**.... ._ / \. ... . <++++ ++++ - v North ' _ _<* +› **** ter, � * + **** * + v - G/C= .231 G/C= ' .680 G= _.20.8" G= 61.2" Y+R__..4 �"._. :,.Y+R= 4.0" - OFF= .0% . OFF=2 7.5- ., - -C= 90 sec G= 82.0 sec = 91. 1% Y= 8.0 sec = 8.9% Ped= .0 sec = .0% Lane =JWidth/ C Service Rate Ad ' HCM L Max I Group. Lanes ) Regdg,/: Used I @C ,(vph) @E (Volumed v/c Delay I S 190% Queue I S Approach 20.0 C RT LT 1 12/1 12/1 I .184 197 I .242.242 I 314 273 I 375 424 I 28 231 I .075.545 I 17 .0 20.4 I *C+ ) 27 223 ftl E Approach 3.7 A TH LT 1 24/2 12/1 I . 1911 I .691.691 I25663 12575 8 I 766 40 I .476 9 I 7 .3 3.5 I B+I 150 25 ftl W Approach 7 .6 B+ I TH+RTI 24/2 1 .563 1 .691 1 2507 1 2507 12012 I .803 I 7.6 I *B+I 389 ftl Center For Microcomputers In Transportation . HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2. 1 Page 1 *.***********.*************************************************** .. File Name - AMB-C3P.HCO Streets: (N-S) 148th Avenue SE (E-W) NE 4th/SE 128th St. Major Street Direction EW Length -of Time Analyzed:: - 60 ('mini) Analyst C. V. Brown Date of -Analysis 8/25/0 Other Information Current P.M. Peak Hour "11'w0-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound LTRLTRLTRLTR No. Lanes 1 2 0 0 2< . 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Stop/Yield N . , .N . - Volumes 55 1157 608 21 43 , 42 PHF • .95 .95 • .95'. .95 .95 '.95 :Grade .0 0` 0 0 :- 14Grg_.:(%) 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 'SU/RV's 0$) 1 1 . 1 1 ' 1 .. 1 CVys:014. - 0. 1 1.. . 0 0 0 PCE's 1.00 1.01 1.01 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adjustment Factors Vehicle - Critical Follow-up Maneuver _ Gap- (tg) - Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2. 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 ;Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2 .1 Page 2 *.**************;************************************************* WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection Step -1: RT from Minor Street ' `" ' NB• SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 314 Potent-ial Capacity: -(-pcph) - 960 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 960 Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.95 Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 629 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 788 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 788 Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.93 Step '4: LT from Minor Street _ NB SB,. Conflicting Flows: (vph) = 1830 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 72 Major LT, -Minor TH ` Impedance Factor: - ' 0.93 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.93 Capacity-Adjustment Factor ... -. - -" due to Impeding Movements 0.93 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 67 . Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: . Unsignalized Intersection Release 2. 1 Page 3 **************************************************************** Intersection Performance Summary - , , - FlowRate-MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App SB L ,.; 45 . .. . , 67 148.5 F ._.._.-. 77.0 SB R 44 960 . 3.9 A EB L 58 788 , 4.9 A 0.2 Intersection Delay = 3.5 Amberwood Development 08/26/** 156th Avenue SE/SE 128th Street 11: 16:54 Current P.M. Peak Hour File AMB-05P SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Summary of Parameter- Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA - NONCBD LOSTTIME 3.0 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS - N E S W GRADES .0 .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS _ _ 0 ._, 0 5 0 PARKINGSIOES : NONE = NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES - .0 . 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 2 0 2 RIGHTTURNONREDS` ` - -.. 0 0 - 0 0 ^Movement Parameters ' ' ' _ - MOVLABELS- RT TH LTT BT- - TH LT ` RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 0 0- 0 0 442 207 98 - 0 149 431 744 0 WIDTHS .::. "= -- 0. . .0 .0- .0. 24.0 12.0 12.0 =` `_.0 12.0 .0 24 .0 - .0 LANES - 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 ` 0 - 1 0 2 0 UTILIZATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 - .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS .0 .0 .0 .0 2.0 .0 4.0 .0 3.0 2.0 .0 .0 PEAKHOURFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .92 .90 .85 1.00 .87 .91 .91 1.00 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4 .0 4 .0 4.0 4 .0 4 .0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NSTOPFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 0 0 0 0 3711 1805 1549 0 1752 0 3550 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 17 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET .00 1 CYCLES 90 110 10 PEDTIME .0 0 GREENTIMES 16.33 19.36 42.30 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 4 .00 CRITICALS 9 6 11 EXCESS 0 •1 v' Amberwood Development 08/26/** 156th Avenue SE/SE 128th Street 11: 16:20 Current. P.M. Peak -Hour - , . File AMB-05P. SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] .- Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 17 I Phase 1 .I Phase 2 1 .Phase .3 ;1 **/** /1\ <++++ **** v North <* -+> +> -****> I * + + **** * • + + v G/C= .181 - G/C= .215 G/C= ..47,0 ' G= 16.3" .G= 19.4" .G= .42.-3" Y+R= 4.0" - Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4 .0" OFF= -.0% OFF=2 2.6% .OFF=48.5% C= 90 sec G= 78..0 .sec = :86.7% Y=12.0 sec = 1=3..,3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% MVMT TOTALS •N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Int Param:Units RT TH LT RT -TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total N AdjVol: vph 0 0 0 0 504 230 115 . 0 171 498 859 . 0 2377 Wid/Ln-:ft/# 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 24/2 -12/1 12/1 0/0 12/1 0/0 24/2 0/0 g/C Rqd@C:% 0 0 0 __0 19 19 14 0 16 .0 41 0 g/C Used: % -.0 0 0 0 23 23 45 0 19 0 48 0 SV @E: vph 0 0 0 00 839 408 700 0 336 0 17.08 0 3991 Svc Lvl:LOS C C B+ C B C+ Deg Sat:v/c .00 .00 .00 .00 .60 .56 . 16 .00 .51 .00 .79 .0.0 .68 Avg Del:s/v .0 .0 .0 .0 32.2 33.6 15. 1 .0 35.0 .0 21.7 . .0 25.7 Tot Del:min 0 0 0 0 68 32 7 0 25 0 122 0 254 # Stops:veh 0 0 0 0 113 51 17 0 38 0 285 0 504 Max Que:veh 0 0 0 0 19 9 3 0 7 0 . 35 0 73 Max Que: ft 0 0 0 0 247 222 81 0 176 0 442 0 442 = ... APPR TOTALS Int Param:Units N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Total AdjVol: vph 0 734 286 1357 2377 Svc Lvl:LOS C C+ B C+ Deg Sat:v/c .00 .59 .37 .79 .68 Avg Del:s/v .0 32.6 27.0 21.7 25.7 Tot Del:min 0 100 32 122 254 # Stops:veh 0 164 55 285 504 Max Que:veh 0 28 10 35 73 Max Que: ft 0 247 176 442 442 ,- 1'' Amberwood Development 08/26/** I56th Avenue SE/SE 128th Street 11: 16: 15. Current P.M. Peak- Hour File AMB-05P SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) .68 Vehicle Delay 16.9 Level of Service C+ Sq 17, I: Phase 1 I Phase '2 I Phase 3 I **/*,* - ---r---*- /•\.,, <++++ **** v - North, <* +> +> ****> I * + + **** * + + v • G/C= . 181 G/C= .215 G/C= .470 - °-G= ,16.3" G= 19.4" G= 42.3" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" OFF=, OFF=2 2 6% OFF=4 8.5% C= 90 sec G= 78.0 sec:;= 86.7% Y=12.O .sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% I Lane g/C Service Rate Adj ACM L Max Group 'Width/ Lanes ' Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E IVolume.I v/c I Delay ( S 190%Queue I S Approach 17 .0 C+ RT LT 112/1 12/1 I . 163. 141 I .193.452 I 223 629 I 336 700 I 171 115 I . 164.507 I 22. 1 9.4 I *C+I 1771 6 ftI E Approach 21. 1 C TH LT 1 24/2 12/1 I .186. 192 I .226.226 I 669 295 I 839 408 I 504 230 ( .601.564 I 21.0 21.3 I *C 1222 ft 247 I W Approach 14.6 B I TH+RTI 24/2 I .408 I .481 11645 11708 11357 I .794 I 14.6 I *B 1442 ftl • Ainberwood Development 08/25/** Duvall Avenue NE/NE 4th. Street . 09:43: 10 2002 P.M. Peak Hour W/0 Project File AMB-H1P- SIGNAL94/TEAPAC.[V1 L1.4] - Summary. of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD LOSTTIME-. 3.0 LEVELOFSERVICE C S- NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach,.Parameters.- APPLABELS N. E , S.- W GRADES . .0C .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVEL$e 0 0 0` 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0;; 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 2 0 2 RIGHTTURNONREDS 35 : 20 . 0 0 Movement_.Parameters:. MOVLABELS_ . RT TH LT' RT TH' LT RT TH LT RT' TH LT VOLUMES 241. 39' 439 218 549 10 22 21 17 48 1204 279 WIDTHS 12.0 12.0 12.0 11.0 24.0 12.0 .0 14 .0 .0 .0 24.0 12.0 LANES 1 1 1 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 UTILIZATIONS .00 . .00 .00 .00 _ .00 - .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS. 3.0 .0 2.0 .0' 1.0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 1.0 .0 PEAKHOURFACTORS .81 .89 .92 .71 .82. .63 .79 .76 .85 .86 .97 .87 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES REQCLEARANCES 4 .0 4.0 4.0 4 .0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4 .0 4.0 4.0 4.0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NSTOPFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 1568 1900 1431 1549 3762 334 0 1656 0 0 3725 1805 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 13 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET .00 1 CYCLES 90 110 10 PEDTIME .0 0 GREENTIMES 35.02 21.21 21.78 YELLOWTIMES 4 .00 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 3 12 4 EXCESS 0 13' • • Ambezwood Development 08/25/** Duvall Avenue NE/NE 4th Street 09:42 :37 2002 P.M.- PeakHour W/0 Project File AMB-H1P SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1- L1.4]. - Evaluat'ionr'of' Intersection Performance Sq 13 I° 'Phase 1 I Phase 2 ' " Phase 3' - j -• - **/** + .* . - ._.- ..+-.- - .. + -+ ../..- + - **** /'V,, <+._„+-..*>- ' - <+ - .. <++++ v ++++ A **** ' v North <+ + +> ++++> ++++> I + + + ++++ ++++ ' + + + v . v G/C= .389 . 'G/C= .236 G/C= .242 G= 35.0" G= ' 21.2" G= 2.1.8" _.•Y}R=_..4-..-0 . Y+R= 4 0'" ._ Y+R= 4.0" OFF .0% OFF=43.4% OFF=71.4% C= 9.0'=--sec- G= 78- 0 'sec = 86.7% Y=12.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = . .0% MVMT TOTALS - - N" Approach----...-- .E Approach S Approach W Approach Int Param:Units RT - TB LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH ' LT Total AdjVoir'vpli -- -254 - 44 477- • 27-9-7O3- -16'- 28. 28 .. 20---...-59 1303..'_. 321 - 3532 Wid/Ln:ft/# 12/1 12/1 12/1 11/1 24/2• 12/10/0 14/1 0/0 0/0 24/2 12/1 g/C Rqd@C:% 23 9 39- 25 ' 23 _ 8 '0 - 11' • 0 0 39 24 g/C -Used: ..% ' 68 40 '40 ' 25 25 25 .-0' --4-0-` --0._. 0 53 225 SV @E: vph 1067 760 573 392 952 74 0 663 0 0 1986 445 6912 Svc Lvl:LOS A B C C C C+ B B C C+ Deg Sat:v/c .24 .06 .83 .71 .74 . 19 .00 . 12 .00 .00 .69 .72 .67 Avg Del:s/v 6.0 .16.7 34.5 36.7 33.0 30.9 .0 17.3 .0 .0 16.5 36.5 24 .9 Tot Del:min 6 3 69 43 97 2 0 5 0 0 94 49 368 # Stops:veh 24 7 107 64 161 3 .0 12 0 0 251 74 703 Max Que:veh 4 1 14 10 26 1 0 2 0 0 32 12 102 Max Que: ft 103 33 362 260 330. 25 0 57 0 0 400 302 400 APPR TOTALS Int Param:Units N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Total AdjVol: vph 775 998 76 1683 3532 Svc Lvl:LOS C+ C B B C+ Deg Sat:v/c .59 .72 .12 .69 .67 Avg Del:s/v 24 . 1 34 .0 17.3 20.3 - 24 .9 Tot Del:min 78 142 5 143 368 # Stops:veh 138 228 12 325 703 Max Que:veh 19 37 2 44 102 Max Que: ft 362 330 57 400 400 Amberwood Development 08/25/** Duvall Avenue NE/NE 4th Street- 09:42 :28 2002 P.M. Peak Hour W/O Project File AMB-H1P * SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages;:;.: Degree of Saturation (v/c) .67 Vehicle Delay 16.4 Level of Service C+ • Sq 13 J. . .Phase.`1. :_I..,. Phase_ 2 Phase 3 **/** + + * + ^ + + * .�. **** /• <+ + *> <+ <++++ V ++++ ^ *.*;** v North <+ + +> ++++> ++++> +- + + ++++. ++++ + .+.. +_ v. _ v G/C= .389 G/-C= .236 G/C= .242 ' G=;.:. 35.0" G= . ,_21.2" G= 21.8" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" _OFF=- .0% ,OFF=43.4% . OFF=71.4% C= 90 sec G= 78.0 sec = 86.7% Y=12.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% ILane Width/ .g/C , _ _:_: Service,Rate Adj HCM L 90% Max Group Lanes Reqd Used. @C -(vph)- @E (Volume' v/c Delay S Queue I N Approach 15.8 C+ RT 12/1 .229 .680 1041 1067 254 1 .238 1 3.6 1 A 103 ft TH 12/1 .087 .400 675 760 44 .058 10.7 B 33 ft LT 12/1 .390 .400 495 573 477 .832 22.8 *C 362 ft S Approach 11.0 B ILT+TH+RTI 14/1 . 111 1 .400 I 581 663 I 76 I . 115 1 11.0 1 B I °7 ftl E Approach 22.5 C RT 11/1 .246 .253 291 392 279 .712 1 23.9 *C 1 260 ft TH 24/2 .232 .253 792 952 703 .738 22. 1 C 330 ft LT 12/1 .084 .253 48 74 16 .190 17.2 C+ 25 ft W Approach 13.2 B 400 ft1 I LT+RTI 24/2 .392 .533 12/1 .240 .247 1334 946 1445 986 1321 362 I .721 I 24 .0 I *C 1302 ftl •Amberwood Development 08/25/** 144th Avenue SE/SE 128th Street 09:55:22. 2002 P.M. Peak Hour W/O Project File AMB-H2P SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1- 'L1.4-] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection •Parameters .- METROAREA ' . NONCBD LOSTTIME 3.0 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION .0 0 , Approach Parameters_ . . APPLABEL5 ;. , - :..',. . N : . E S W GRADES -'„ - .0 .. .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS`' ;.0.::, ; ' 0 5 0 PARKINGSIDES - NONE' NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES _ - _0 . ..... .-- ... 0... _ 0 ...... 0 BUSVOLUMES • ' ' 0 2 0 2 RIGHTTU'RNONREDS °-:.- .._._.... . _ . .._0. ...... ..:_. ._. 0 0 . . 0 Movement Parameters'' MOVLABELS`` = RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 1=,0,. -0 0 0 686 30 21 0 210 463 1373 0 WIDTHS .'0' :0.-` :0 ' .0 24.0 12.0 12.0 .0 12.0 .0 24 .0 .0 LANES 0 . 0 .- =.0 0 2 1 . 1 0 1 0 . 2 0 UTILIZATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS - - - .0 • - .0 :-0 -.0 -2.0 .0 4 .0 .0 3.0 2 .0 .0 .0 PEAKHOURFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .90 .75 .75 1.00- .87 .94 .91 1.00 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES REQCLEARANCES 4 .0 4 .0 4.0 4.0 4 .0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5 .0 5.0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DELAYFACTORS '1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NSTOPFACTORS 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 0 0 0 0 3711 122 1549 0 1752 0 3627 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET .00 1 CYCLES 90 110 10 PEDTIME . 0 0 GREENTIMES 20.58 61.42 YELLOWTIMES 4 .00 4 .00 CRITICALS 9 11 EXCESS 0 b' Amberwood Development 08/25/** 144th Avenue SE/SE 128th Street 09:54 :50 2002 P.M. Peak Hour W/O Project File AMB-H2P SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1: L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 11 I Phase 1. .. Phase_. 2. **/**. . J. r / \ <++++ ++++ North .. <.* +> ****> I _:, :.' ! , :* + **** . . G/C .22�9 G./C= ,:.682.: G= 2 0.6" :G .61.4".,. _. ..: Y+R= 4`.:.0" Y+R 4.0" -OFF .0% OFF=27:3%-- ....- - _. C= 90: sec G= 82.0 sec = 91. 1% Y= 8.0 sec = 8.9% Ped= .0 sec = .0% MVMT TOTALS N Approach E Approach S Approach - W Approach Int Param:Units - RT -TH LT- RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total AdjVol: vph - 0 0 0 0 800 40 28 0 241 518 1584 0 3211 Wid/Ln:ft/# 0/0-- 0/=0 0-/0:. - 0/0 24/2 12/1 12/1 0/0 12/1 0/0 24/2 0/0 g/C Rqd@C:% . 0 0- 0 0 26 19 8 • 0 20 0 59 0 g/C vp h @ : 0 0 0 0 2574 78 371 0 420 0 2516 0 5959 Svc Lvl:LOS A B+ C+ C B+ B+ Deg Sat:v/c .00 .00 .00 .00 .31 .48 .08 .00 .57 .00 .83 .00 .67 Avg Del:s/v .0 .0 .0 .0 5.7 24.8 26.9 .0 32 .9 .0 12 . 1 .0 12 .4 Tot Del:min 0 0 0 0 19 4 3 0 33 0 106 0 165 # Stops:veh 0 0 0 0 78 5 .5 0 53 0 383 0 524 Max Que:veh 0 0 0 0 12 1 1 0 9 0 32 0 55 Max Que: ft 0 0 0 0 155 25 27 0 233 0 404 0 404 APPR TOTALS Int Param:Units N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Total AdjVol: vph 0 840 269 2102 3211 Svc Lvl:LOS A C B+ B+ Deg Sat:v/c .00 .32 .52 .83 .67 Avg Del:s/v .0 6.6 32.3 12 . 1 12 .4 Tot Del:min 0 23 36 106 165 # Stops:veh 0 83 58 383 524 Max Que:veh 0 13 10 32 55 Max Que: ft 0 155 233 404 404 '? . Amberwood Development 08/25/** 144th Avenue SE/SE 128th Street 09:54 :44 2002 P.M. Peak -Hour W/O -Project File, AMB-H2P SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 'L1.4] '- Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: , , Degree of Saturation (v/c) .67 Vehicle Delay 8. 1 Level of Service B+ Sq _11 Phase 1 I Phase '2 **/:** / \ <++++ • ++++ , v Nor(th .:,: <* +> ****> * + ****:•, '-: _ * + v --_ _ -.:G/C=. .229 G/C= .682 F , G= 20.6" G= 61.4" __::Y-I-R= :.4..0" ::Y+R= 4.0" OFF= .0% OFF=27.3% _ .. .i` =C= 90 sec G= 82.0 sec = 91.1% Y= 8.0 sec = 8.9% Ped= .0 sec = .0% I Lane Width/ g/C /C 1 Service Rate Ad ' HCM L Max Group Lanes l Reqd Used ( @C (vph) @E Rate' v/c I Delay I S 190%Queue l S Approach 20.5 C l RT LT 1 12/1 12/1 I .084.202 I .240.240 I 269 310 I 371 420 I 241 I .574 I 17. 1 20.9 I *C+ 27 I 233 ftl E Approach 3.7 A LT 112/1 I 24/2 . 191 I .694 12574 63 125748 l 840 I .476 00 .311 I 3.7 .2 5 I A B+ I 125 ft55 I W Approach 8 .4 B+ TH+RTI 24/2 I .585 I .694 12516 12516 12102 I .83.5 I 8.4 I *B+I 404 ft ) /I4. Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2. 1 Page 1 ***.********.******.*********************************************** File Name AMB-H3P.HC0 Streets: (N-S) 148th Avenue SE (E-W) NE 4th/SE 128th St. Major Street Direction EW Length of Time Analyzed 60 (min)' Analyst C. V. Brown Date of Analysis .., 8/25/0 Other Information 2002 P.M. Peak Hour, Baseline 'Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound .. L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- :NC.- Lanes 1 2 0 0 2< 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 'Stop/Yield N N _Volumes 55 1208 635- 21 43 42 PHF .95 9.5 .95 .95 .95 .95 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC's (%), 0 0 0 0 0 0 SU/RV's (%) 1 `1 1 1 1 1 CV's (%) 0 1 1 0 0 0 PCE's" - 1 .00 1.01 1.01 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adjustment Factors - Vehicle Critical Follow-up.. Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2. 10 . Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 ..-19 • Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2. 1 Page 2 **************************************************************** _ - , F ,y - ' ' WorkSheet for 'TWSC Intersection - Step'-- 1=: RT- from-Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 328 Potential Capacity: ••(pcph) ' 944 Move iient=Capacity: '.(pcph) 944 Prob... of Queue-free State: - 0.95 Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 656 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 762 Movement Capacity: (pcph) , = 762 Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.92 Step 4: LT from Minor-'Street ' ' NB SB Conflicting Flows: ('bph•) �' < 1908 Potential Capacity: '(pcph) - 64 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance- Factor: - -- ` -. 0.92 Adjusted= Impedance Factor: 0.92 • Capacity Adjustment Factor due- tn-"Impeding- Movements- Movement Capacity: "'/pcph) 59 0 , • Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2 .1 Page 3 **************************************************************** Intersection Performance"Summary • - - FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement':*v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh'(pcph) Delay LOS ' ' By App. • SB L 45.. _ .. ...5g.....:. - : 207. 1 F 106.8 SB ._R _ 44 _:944-.... ... . ... . ..-.._ . 4.0 A EB L 58 762 5.1 B 0.2 Intersection Delay = 4.7 • i i . Amberwood Development 08/25/** 156th Avenue SE/SE 128th Street 10:09:26 2002 P.M. Peak Hour W/O Projects File AMB-H5P SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.47 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters -. _ METROAREA NONCBD LOSTTIME 3.0 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES .0 .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 5 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE . NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES . 0 2 0 2 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT --.TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES- 0 0 ' 0 0 462 208 98 0 149 432 777 0 WIDTHS:-- ::_ 0 ..... 0 .0 .0 24.0 12.0 . ..12.G- - -•-.0 12.0": .0- 24.0 _-...-:0 LANES 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 UTILIZATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 - .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS .0 .0 .0 .0 2.0 .0 4.0 .0 3.0 2.0 .0 .0 PEAKHOURFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .92 .90 .85 1.00 .87 .91 .91 1.00 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES YES YES -YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4 .0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4 .0 4 .0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4 .0 " MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NSTOPFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 0 0 0 0 3711 1805 1549 0 1752 0 3556 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 17 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET .00 1 CYCLES 90 110 10 PEDTIME .0 0 GREENTIMES 16. 12 19. 17 42.71 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4 .00 4 .00 CRITICALS 9 6 11 EXCESS 0 AmberwoodDevelopment 0.8/25/** 156th .AvenueSE/SE 12,8th Street 10:08:58 2002 P.M. Peak Hour W/O Projects File AMB-H5P SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 17 1 Phase 1 . ..A Phase 2 ( Phase 3 **/** / <++++ **** v • North <* +> +> ****> * + + **** * + + v G/C= .179 G./C= .213 G/C= ..475 G=,. ..16.1" G= 19.2" G= 42.7" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4 .0" Y.+R= 4.0" OFF= .0%. OFF=22..4% OFF=48.1% _ C= 90 sec G= 78.0 sec = 86.7% Y=12.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% MVMT TOTALS N Approach E Approach... ..S Approach, .W Approach Int Param .Units RT _ . TH LT RT.,. ._TH.:_,_. �LT 1 T_ TH _ „ LT RT„_, ...TH LT Total AdjVol: vph 0 0 0 ,0 527 .231 115 0 171 .499 896 . 0 2439 Wid/Ln:.ft/# 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 24/2 12/1 12/1 0/0 12/1 0/0 24/2 0/0 g/C Rqd@C:% 0 0 0 0 19 19 14 0 16 0 42 0 g/C vp h @ : 0 0 0 0 832 405 693 0 332 0 1727 "0 3989 Svc Lvl:LOS C C B+ C B C+ Deg Sat:v/c .00 .00 .00 .00 .63 .57 .17 .00 .51 .00 .81 .00 .70 Avg Del:s/v .0 .0 .0 .0 32.8 33.8 15.3 .0 35.3 .0 21.8 . .0 26.0 Tot Del:min 0 0 0 0 72 33 7 0 25 0 127 0 264 # Stops:veh 0 0 0 0 119 51 17 0 38 0 295 0 520 Max Que:veh 0 0 0 0 20 9 3 0 7 0 36 0 75 Max Que: ft 0 0 0 0 259 224 . 81 0 176 0 450 0 450 APPR TOTALS Int Param:Units N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Total AdjVol: vph 0 758 286 1395 2439 Svc Lv1:LOS C C+ B C+ Deg Sat:v/c .00 .61 .37 .81 .70 Avg Del:s/v .0 33. 1 27.3 21.8 26.0 Tot Del:min 0 105 32 127 264 # Stops:veh 0 170 55 295 520 Max Que:veh 0 29 10 36 75 Max Que: ft 0 259 176 450 450 �3� Amberwood Development 08/25/** 156th Avenue .,SE/SE 128th Street 10:08:53 200.2 P.M. Peak Hour W/O Projects File AMB-H5P SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages Degree of Saturation (v/c) .70 Vehicle Delay 17.1 Level of Service C+ Sq 1.7 :.I.. Phase 1 1 Phase _2 1 Phase 3 1 **/** _. . . /1 \ <++++ **** North <* +> +> ****> _ * + + **** „ • ._,- * + G/.C= : 179 G/C= •.213 G/C= .475 G= 16.1" G= 19.2" G= 42.7" - Y+R= 4.0 Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= .0% OFF=22.4% OFF=48. 1% ,C= 90 sec G= 78.0 sec = 86.7% Y=12.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% Lane :.Width/ = g/C ServiiceRatei Adj I HCM I• L I90% Mal Group - Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E Volume v/c DelayS Queue S Approach 17.2 C+ I RT LT 1 12/1 12/1 I . 141.163 I .448. 190 I 621 219 I 693 332 I 115 171 I . 166.514 I 9.6 22.3 I *C+ I 171 76 ft) E Approach 21.5 C TH LT 1 24/2 12/1 I . 193.192 I .224.224 I 291 661 I 405 I 231 I .570 I 21.5 I *C 1224 ft 259 I W Approach 14 .8 B TH+RTI 24/2 1 .417 1 .486 1 1666 1 1727 1 1395 1 .808 1 14.8 I *B 1 450 ftl Amberwood • Development 08/25/** Duvall Avenue NE/NE . 4th Street 09:48: 13 2002 P.M. Peak 'Hour W/Projects File AMB-P1P SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - --Summary:-Of .'Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD LOSTTIME 3..0 LE-VELORS-RVICR C S NODELOCAT-ION 0 ,0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS .1N ;E S W GRADES .0 .0 .0 0 PEDLEVFLS ,0 0 =0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE -NONE -NONE ;NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 .0 _0 BUSVOLUMES 0 2 0 2 RIGHTTURNONREDS 35 20 0 `0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 241 39 482 242 593 10 22 21 17 48 1285 279 WIDTHS 12.0 12.0 12.0 11.0 -240 12.0 .0 14 .0 .0 .0 24 .0 12.0 LANES 1 1 1 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 `2 1 UTILIZATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS 3.0 .0 2.0 ....0 1.0 .0 .0 .0 - .0 .0 1.0 .0 PEAKHOURFACTORS .81 .89 .92 .71 .82 .63 .79 ..76 .85 .-86 .97 .87 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES •YES YES REQCLEARANCES 4 .0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4 .0 4.0 4.0 4 .0 4.0 4.0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 -5.0 5.0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NSTOPFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 1568 1900 1435 1549 3762 335 0 1657 0 0 3726 1805 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 13 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET .00 1 CYCLES 90 110 10 PEDTIME .0 0 GREENTIMES 37 .28 19.06 21.66 YELLOWTIMES 4 .00 4.00 4 .00 CRITICALS 3 12 4 EXCESS 0 • Amberwood Development 08/25/** Duvall Avenue .NE/-NEAth Street 09:47:36 2002 P.M. Peak Hour "W/Projects File AMB-P1P . SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 13 -I- Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 **/** 'ii" . .: .. .. / + + * + A • + ..+:..*., ... .. . .-._..+ **** / \ <+ `+_ .*> <+r' <++++ v .. _... _ ++++ A **** v North <+ + +> ++++> ++++> 1 + + + ++++ ++++ + + + v v G/C= .414 G/C= .212 G/C= .241 G= 37 .3" G= 19. 1" G= 21.7" Y+R= 4 .0" Y+R= 4.0" . Y+R= 4.0" . OFF=- -.0% ' OFF=4 5.9% OFF=71.5% C= 90 sec .G='78.0 sec = 86.7% Y=12.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% MVMT TOTALS N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Int Param:Units - - -RT TH LT -ART TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total AdjVol: vph 254 44 524 313 759 16 28. 28 20 59 1391 321. 3757 Wid/Ln:-ft/# 12/-1 -12/1 12/1 11/1 24/2 12/1 0/0 14/1 0/0 . 0/0 24/2 12/1 g/C ..Rgd@C:% 23 9 42 27 25 8 0 11 0 0" 41 24 g/C Used: %. -68 43 43 25 25. 25 0 43 0 .0 51 22. SV @E: .. vph 1069 -808 610 390----.947 74 0 705 - - . 0 ' 0 1893 402 6898 Svc Lvl:LOS A B+ C D+ C C+ B B D+ C+ Deg Sat:v/c .24 .05 .86 .80 .80 . 19 .00 . 11 .00 .00 .77 .80 .73 Avg Del:s/v .6.0 15.3 35.8 43. 1 35.2 31.0 .0 15.9 .0 .0 19.4 43.6 28.0 Tot Del:min 6 3 78 56 111 2 0 5 0 0 117 58 436 # Stops:veh 24 6 119 73 178 3 0 11 0 0 292 76 782 Max Que:veh 4 1 15 12 28 1 0 2 0 0 36 12 111 Max Que: ft 103 32 381 293 357 25 0 55 0 0 448 312 448 APPR TOTALS Int Param:Units N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Total AdjVol: vph 822 1088 ' 76 1771 3757 Svc Lvl:LOS C+ D+ B C+ C+ Deg Sat:v/c .62 .79 . 11 .77 .73 Avg Del:s/v 25.5 37.4 15.9 23.8 28.0 Tot Del:min 87 169 5 175 436 # Stops:veh 149 254 11 368 782 Max Que:veh 20 41 2 48 111 Max Que: ft 381 357 55 448 448 Amberwood Development 08/25/** Duvall Avenue NE/NE 4th Street 09:47:30 2002" P.M. Peak Hour W/Projects File AMB-P1P SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) .73 Vehicle Delay 18.5 Level of Service C+ Sq 13 :)_... Phase 1 -I I- Phase 2 •I Phase 3 **/*•* • . A + .* + **** / \ <+ + *> <+ <++++ v ++++ A **** -•- v North <+ + +> ++++> ++++> • + + + : ++++, ' ++++ + + + v v _G/C :_41-4- G/.C= .212 G/C= 241 G - 3 7=.3" G=. 19. 1" G= 21.7" ' Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" . Y+R= 4.0" OFF= ` .0% OFF=45.'9% OFF=71.5% C= 90 sec - ''G= 1-8:0= sec = 86.7% Y=12.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% Lane • - -IWidth/ I g/C Service Rate Adj .I - I HCM I L 190% Maxi Group Lanes Reqd Used @C .(vph) -@E Volume v/c Delay S Queue N Approach 16.5 . C+ RT 1 12/1 1 .229 .682 1043 1 1069 254 .238 3.5 A 103 ft TH 12/1 .087 .425 728 808 . 44 .054 9.8 B+ 32 ft LT 12/1 .418 .425 536 610 524 .859 23.4 *C 381 ft S Approach 10. 1 B ILT+TH+RTI 14/1 I . 111 I .415 I 628 I 705 I 76 I .108 I 10. 1 I B I 55 ftl E Approach 25. 1 D+ RT 1 11/1 .267 .252 289 390 1 313 1 .803 1 28.3 *D+ 293 ft TH 24/2 .245 .252 786 947 759 .801 23.9 C 357 ft LT 12/1 .084 .252 48 74 , 16 . 190 17 .2 C+ 25 ft W Approach 15.8 C+ ILTTH+RTI 24/2 12/1 I .240 I .223.413 .508 11288 843 i 1402 893 i 13211 I .799 I 766 28.8 i *D+1 312 ft448 l 2-?— Amberwood Development 08/25/** 144th Avenue SE/Jericho Ave. /SE 128th Street 09:59:29 2002 P.M. Peak Hour W/Projects, N. Leg Built File AMB-P2P SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters .. METROAREA NONCBD• LOSTTIME..: !t:- . .4:, 3 0 LEVELOFSERVICE C S. NODELOCATIONs : 0.: 0 ... Approach Parameters APPLABELS "- 'N GRADES - .0 ._ .0 •; .0 .0 PEDLEVELS ; ; . :0:'.. : 0 5 0 PARKINGSIDES ::NONE NONE NONE • NONE PARKVOLUMES .. s-_:_ 0 0.. . .. 0 _.. 0 BUSVOLUMES l: 0 2 0 2 RIGHTTURNONREDS----- -_.. .__._._...0 --. .-. __ -- -- - _.0 0 0 Movement5Parameters : MOVLABELS RT TH .;:LT: RT TH LT.• RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES _ - 8 0 - •. 1 1 746 30 21 0 210 463 1481 16 WIDTHS - -.0 .14.0 : .0 .0 24.0 12.0. 12.0 .0 12.0 .0 24 .0 .0 LANES . -. 0-- - . _.1 ._ .. 0 0 2 -1• . - 1 0 1 0 2 0 UTILIZATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00: .00 .00 ~.00 .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS - .0 - .0 - -•.0 -----.-0 - -2.0 .0 4.0 0 -- 3.0 2. 0 .0 .0 PEAKHOURFACTORS .90 1.00 .80 1.00 .90 .75 .75 1.00 .87 .94 .91 1.00 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS. YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES REQCLEARANCES 4 .0 4 .0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4 .0 4 .0 4.0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5 .0 5 .0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 NSTOPFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 0 1398 0 0 3710 117 1549 0 1752 0 3266 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO. NO LEADLAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET .00 1 CYCLES 90 110 10 PEDTIME .0 0 GREENTIMES 18. 19 63.81 YELLOWTIMES 4 .00 4 .00 CRITICALS 9 11 EXCESS 0 2g., Amberwood Development 08/25/** 144th Avenue SE/Jericho Ave. /SE 128th Street 09:59:00 2002 P.M. Peak Hour W/Projects, N. Leg Built File AMB-P2P SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1`-L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 11 . I Phase 1 Phase"2 I -_ -._ **/** + - + . +.. + ... - ++++ / \ <+ +> " <+++'+ **** °: v ' North., <* +>. ****> * + **** +_ v G/C= .202 G/C= .709 G= 18'..2".. G_. .6.3...8"... .__,_--__.,_:. ..- - Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" ' OFF=__ .. ..0% OFF=2 4.7% _ rC= 90 sec G= 82.0 sec = 91. 1% Y= 8.0 sec = 8.9% Ped= .0 sec = .0% MVMT TOTALS N Approach ' E Approach S Approach W Approach Int Param:Units RT TH LT ''` RT TH LT RT. TH LT RT TH LT Total AdjVol: vph . 9 0 1._..`_,3-- 870 40 28 0 241 5.18 1708 17 3433 Wid/Ln:ft/# 0/0 14/1 0/0 0/0 24/2 12/1 12/1 0/0 12/1 0/0 24/2 0/0 g/C Rqd@C:% 0 8"_.. .. 0- - 0 28 .. .. 19 - 8 0 20 0 68 0 g/C Used: % 0 21 0 0 72 72 21 0 21 0 72 0 SV @E: vph 0 295 0 0 2672 79 329 0 374 0 2352 0 6101 Svc Lvl:LOS C+ A B+ C+ C B B Deg Sat:v/c .00 .03 .00 .00 .33 .48 .09 .00 .64 .00 .95 .00 .76 Avg Del:s/v .0 28.3 .0 .0 4 .9 23.9 28.8 .0 36 .4 .0 17 .3 .0 15.7 Tot Del:min 0 1 0 0 18 4 3 0 37 0 161 0 224 # Stops:veh 0 2 0 0 80 4 •6 0 55 0 501 0 648 Max Que:veh 0 0 0 0 12 1 1 0 9 0 31 0 54 Max Que: ft 0 25 0 0 154 25 28 0 241 0 393 0 393 APPR TOTALS Int Param:Units N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Total AdjVol: vph 10 911 269 2243 3433 Svc Lvl:LOS C+ A C B B Deg Sat:v/c .03 .33 .59 .95 .76 Avg Del:s/v 28.3 5.7 35.6 17 .3 15.7 Tot Del:min 1 22 40 161 224 # Stops:veh 2 84 61 501 648 Max Que:veh 0 13 10 31 54 Max Que: ft 25 154 241 393 393 29� Amberwood Development 08/25/** 144th Avenue SE/Jericho Ave./SE 128th Street 09:58:49 2002 P.M. Peak Hour W/Projects, .N. .Leg ;Built File AMB-P2P SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4]•' - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree, of. Saturation (v/c) .76 Vehicle Delay 1.2.2 _ ..,Level of Service B Sq 11 _.:: :Phase :-1-.::::;.,.I_ - Phase-::2 .. ..-. ...__ **/** ....,--r.--- + + is • + + . ....... ._.... ..++++ . .. .. ,- / \ <+ ,, .:.+.> <++++ ,, A ++++ **** North : +. <* +> ****> ' -. . I * + **** *. +. v -_6 a _ , G/C .202 G/C= .709 . -: G= 18.2" G= _ 63.8 _ 4 . , , - -Y+R= 4..0 ,., Y+R -4.0" . . _ _ . . _.. OFF= .0% OFF=24.7% C= 90 sec G= 82.0 sec = 91. 1% Y= 8.0 sec = 8.9% Ped= .0 sec = .0% ILane. . I Width/ I g/C I Service Rate I 'Adj, ;I I HCM -I. L 190% Max I Group ] Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume v/c Delay S Queue N Approach 18. 1 C+ ILT+TH+RTI 14/1 I .076 I .213 I 201 I 295 I • 10 I .034 I 18. 1 I C+ I 25 ftl S Approach 23.0 C IRT LT 1 12/1 12/1 I .202.084 I .213.213 I 261 226 I 374 329 I 241 I .644.085 I 23.5 18.3 I *C+ I 2421 ftI E Approach 3.2 A ILT+RTI 12/1 24/2 I ..275 191 I ..720 720 12662 4 I26792 I 840 71 I ..326 476 I 3.0 6.6 I B+I 125 ft54 I W Approach 14.6 B ILT+TH+RTI 24/2 I .683 I .720 12352 1 2352 12243 I .954 I 14.6 I *B 1393 ftl J - Center For -Microcoinputers. In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 **************************************************************** File Name . . . . ... . . . . .- AMB-P3P.HCO • Streets::-.(N7,S)'; ih8th Avenue SE (E-W) NE 4th/SE 128th St. Major_Street .Direction EW , Length-of Time Analyzed. ., 60 (mini) Analyst C. V.. .Brown Date of Analysis 8/25/0_ .., Other Information 2002 P.M. Peak Hour, with Amberwood & Maplewood Two-way-Stop-controlled Intersection : - - _. Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound _ L T , ._ R .L . T R L T- R - ... .L T R No.., .Lanes. 1 2< 0 1 2< 01 1 1< 0 1 1< 0 StopY..Yield N ;.. N Volumes 55 1218- 99- , 14: 64.1 21 55 1 8 43 1 42 PHF . .95 .95. .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 Grade 0 0 . 0 0 Me,s., (%) . : 0 0 0 o o: o : o. o o' 0 0 0 SU/RV's (%) 1 1 0 0 1: 1= . o 0•. 0 . 1 •O 1 CV'A .(%) 0 3., 0 0 1; 0 ' , 0. - 0 0 0 0 0 PCE'-s- _ . _ 1,-0.0 1.61 _1..1 _.1-.1 1.01. 1.00 . -.1..1 _1..1 _. .1-1 -i..D_0. 1. 1 1.00 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver_ . . .-.._ . _ ._. ._._ - . - ._ Gap._-(tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2. 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 . 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 3/ ' Center For Microcomputers In' Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2. 1 Page 2 **********•**************************-**************************** WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection - 1 ' ' Step 1: RT from Minor Street ;x •-= ->- NB 1---- SB ' .. Conflicting Flows: (vph) - - - 658 - 331 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 643 941- Movement Capacity: (pcph) 643 941 Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.99 0.95 Step 2: LT from' Major Street WB EB Conflicting Flowskr. (vphr : ; - 1 1317 - 662 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 337 756 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 337 756 Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.95 0.92 Step 3: TH from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1998 2038 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 74 70 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.88 0.88 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 65 61 Prob. of Queue-free .State: 0.98 0.98 Step 4 : LT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph). 1979 1938 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 57 61 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.86 0.86 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.89 0.90 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.85 0 .88 Movement Capacity: (pcph) ,49 54 1 �2 _ Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2. 1 Page 3 **************************************************************** Intersection Performance Summary FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap. Avg.Total Delay Moveme it v( cps ) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App. NB L 64 49 _ 847.6 F NB T 1 65 > > > 718.9 NB R 9 643 > 340 > 10.9 > C SB L 45 54 266.7 F SB T 1 61 > > > 133. 1 SB R 44 941 > ' '711' ` > 5.4 > B EB L 58 756 5.2 B 0.2 WB L 17 337 11.2 C 0.2 Intersection Delay = 26.3 , 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation - HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2 . 1 Page 1 **************************************************************** File Name AMB-P4P.HCO Streets: _ (N-S).- 152nd Avenue SE (E-W) NE 4th/SE 128th St. Major `Street 'Direction. . : . EW ` '' Length of Time Analyzed 60 (min) Analyst - . . " - C. V. Brown Date of Analysis ... 8/25/0 Other Information - 2002 P.M. Peak Hour, with Amberwood & Maplewood Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound . Westbound Northbound Southbound LTRL T . R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0 2< 0 0> 2< 0 0> 1< 0 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N N Volumes - ,1218 :; -,""9 _'1 626 0 5 PHF ' 95 -.95 =.95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 Grade 0 - - 0 0 0 MC's: {$) 0 0 _- - 0 ;0 0 0 0 0 SU/RV's (%) - 1 , 0 : . 0 1 1 0 0 0 CV''s ;(%)+ . . . . 1 0 0. . 1 .. 0 0 0 0 PCE's - -c 7 1.01- 1.1 ' 1.1 1.01 1 1.1 ' 1.1 1.1 --1 �. _ Adjustment Factors Vehicle - Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left -Turn Major Road 5.50 - 2 .10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7 .00 . 3.40 1y, Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2. 1 Page 2 *************************'********************************.******* WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection - - Step 1: RT from Minor Street ,. NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) _ 614 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 676 Movement Capacity: (pcph), : ' 676 Prob. of Queue-free State:' 1.00 Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1227 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 376 Movement Capacity:. (pcph) 376 Prob of Queue-free .State:. 1.00 TH Saturation Fl-bw Rate: (pcphpl) 3800 RT Saturation Flow Rate': (pcphpl) - . 1900 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue-free States "` ` 1.00 _ Step 3: TH from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: _(vph) 1850 Potential Capacity: (pcph) Capacity Adjustment Factor ` due' to Impeding Movements - • 1.00 ' Movement Capacity: (pcph) 90 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1._00 Step 4 : LT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1850 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 69 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 1.00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 1.00 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 1.00 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 69 Center For Microcomputers in Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2. 1 Page 3 **************************************************************** Intersection Performance Summary FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App NB L 6 69 > > > 44.4 E 44.4 NB R 2 676 > > > WB L 1 376 9.6 B 0.0 Intersection Delay = 0.3 •Amberwood Development 08/26/** 156th Avenue SE/SE 128th Street 11: 18:42 2002 P.M. Peak Hour W/Projects File AMB-P5P SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Summary of Pareinete= Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD LOSTTIME 3.0 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES .0 .0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 5 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE - NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 2 0 2 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT ' RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 0 0 0 0 477 208 98 0 149 433 786 0 WIDTHS .0 .0 .0 .0 24.0 12.0 12.0 .0 12.0 .0 24.0 .0 LANES 0 0 0 0 2 1. 1 0 1 0 2 0 UTILIZATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS .0 .0 .0 .0 2.0 .0 4.0 .0 3.0 2.0 .0 .0 PEAKHOURFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .92 .90 .85 1.00 .87 .91 .91 1.00 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4 .0 4.0 4.0 4 .0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5 .0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NSTOPFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 0 0 0 0 3711 1805 1549 0 1752 0 3558 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 17 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET .00 1 CYCLES 90 110 10 PEDTIME .0 0 GREENTIMES 16. 12 19. 17 42.71 YELLOWTIMES 4 .00 4.00 4 .00 CRITICALS 9 6 11 EXCESS 0 f • • - .Amberwood Development 08/26/** 156th Avenue SE/SE 128th Street 11: 18:23 2002 P.M. Peak Hour W/Projects File AMB-P5P SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 17 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 I Phase 3 1 **/** • / \ **** v North <* +> +> ****> ` 1 * + + **** * + + v G/C= .179 G/C= .213 G/C= .475 G= 16. 1" G= 19.2" G= 42.7" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4 .0" Y+R= 4 .0" OFF= .0% OFF=22.4% OFF=48. 1% C= 90"sde. =; G= 78.0 sec = 86.7% Y=12.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% MVMT TOTALS N,.Approach -'.E ,Approach S Approach W Approach Int Param:Units RT. TH LT 'RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total - = == '_ AdjVol: vph :,,.•..0--- ° 0: . :0 :. Q . 544 231.` 115 0 171. - 500 : : 907 0 2468 Wid/Ln:ft/# 0/0._ . 0/0 0/0 0/0 24/2 - 12/1 12/1 0/0 12/1 0/0 24/2 0/0 g/C Rqd@C:% 0 0._ 0 0 20 19 - 14 0 16 0 42 0 g/C Used: % 0 0' 0 • 0 - 22 22 45 0 19 0 49 0 SV @E: vph 0 0 0 -, 0 832 : 405, 693 0 332 0 1728 - 0 3990 Svc Lvl:LOS C C B+ C B C+ Deg Sat:v/c .00 .00 .00 .00 .65 .57 . 17- .00 .51 .00 .81 .00 .70 Avg Del:s/v .0 .0 .0 .0 33. 1 33.8 15.3 .0 35 .3 .0 22. 1 .0 26.2 Tot Del:min 0 0 0 0 75 33 7 0 25 0 129 0 269 # Stops:veh 0 0 0 0 124 51 17 0 38 0 299 0 529 Max Que:veh 0 0 0 0 21 9 3 0 7 0 36 0 76 Max Que: ft 0 0 0 0 267 224 81 0 176 0 454 0 454 APPR TOTALS Int Param:Units N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Total AdjVol: vph 0 775 286 1407 2468 Svc Lv1:LOS C C+ B C+ Deg Sat:v/c .00 .63 .37 .81 .70 Avg Del:s/v .0 33.3 27 .3 22 . 1 26.2 Tot Del:min 0 108 32 129 269 # Stops:veh 0 175 55 299 529 Max Que:veh 0 30 10 36 76 Max Que: ft 0 267 176 454 454 �9,,/ ,Amberwood Development 08/26/** 156th Avenue SE/SE 128th Street 11: 18: 11 2002 P.M. Peak Hour W/Projects File AMB-P5P SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) .71 Vehicle Delay 17.3 Level of Service C+ Sq .17 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 I Phase 3 **/** /• \ <++++ <s **** v North <* +> +> ****> .. 1 *- + + **** * + + v G/C= . 179 G/C= .213 G/C= .475 G= 16.1" G= 19.2" G= 42.7" Y+Rr 1 4:.0." Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= .0% OFF=22.4% OFF=48. 1% C= 90 sec G= 78;0 sec = 86 7% Y=12.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% ILane (Width/ I g./C I Service Rate' Adj I 1 HCM I L 190% MaxGroup `Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume v/c Delay S Queue S Approach 17.2 C+ RT LT 1 12/1 12/1 I . 163. 141 I . 190.448 I 621 219 I 693 332 I 171 115 I .514.166 I 22.3 9.6 I *C+I 176 ftftl E Approach 21.7 C TH LT i 12/1 I . 193 I .224 I 291 661 I 405 832 I 231 I .570 I 21.5 21.8 I *C 1224 ftl W Approach 14 .9 B TH+RTI 24/2 1 .420 1 .486 1 1667 1 1728 1 1407 1 .814 1 14.9 I *B 1 454 ftl ' �Gfr 0 . ; _ 00-150 ( 9 ) 4205 148th Ave.N.E.Suite 200 CORE , . Bellevue,Washington 98007 425.885.7877 Fax 425.885.7963 Iiii.......,,,./DESIGN ' - 0,•4..,* rt ."''''''.-.f.'- . - ' :-' ----.•-::‘, ... ___ PRELIMINARY STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS for AMBERWOOD • RENTON, WASHINGTON •- - - ----,-Pr if :.:11.4jA , ,_ *r ' • 3- ilk ,cf Ifir A%, IF '..',Iejj'5.1. c, 7 0 f 411:4,,Ifr z . CORE Project No.: 00059 / GISTSg=4", Prepared by: Brennan P. Taylor, P.E. . 01p4) 3/ .tar A : '&* OC) 4v' Approved by: David E. Cayton,P.E. caS+ ' ):.cliOhritla. Date: November, 2000 . UPI RE3 6—12—0/ 1 11 - 6- 00 ENGINEERING • PLANNING • SURVEYING AMBERWOOD RENTON,WASHINGTON PRELIMINARY STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS Section I. Introduction II. Offsite Analysis A. Upstream Drainage B. On-Site Drainage C. Downstream Drainage III. Flow Control and Water Quality Analysis and Design A. Hydraulic Analysis B. Detention Routing Calculations C. Water Quality Calculations I. Introduction The Preliminary Plat of Amberwood is located south of SE 128th Street(NE 4th St.) approximately 1000 feet east of 148th Avenue SE.in Renton, Washington. This parcel is approximately 4.2 Acres in size and slopes from northeast to southwest at an average grade of approximately 7%. The existing site is approximately 60%young alder saplings, Douglas fir,western hemlock and with thick underbrush(211d growth forest). The remainder of the parcel is occupied by a single-family residence, gravel driveway and grass lawn. The property is bordered by the Plat of Maplewood(currently under construction) to the west and south,NE 4th on the north and large lot single family residence and commercial facility to the east. The proposed improvements include the construction of 19 single-family dwellings with related grading,utility, and road improvements. A half street improvement to 152nd Ave SE is proposed along the eastern property line and will connect to NE 4th St. There will also be a road connection to the Plat of Maplewood in the northwestern portion of the site. Onsite generated storm water runoff will be directed to a combination wetpond/detention pond in the southwest corner of the site and will discharge to the recently constructed storm drainage system in the Plat of Maplewood. \1 4 3 40. itY S 9 10 II RENTON 1E 4TI4.ST. SITE 6REENUI00D q• CEMETERY jY I1 IG, 15 2 14 11441,0 CEDE44/4`�}} MAPLE1U COURSE GOLF COURSE /\ VICINITY MA 1" • 3000't VICINITY MAP AMBERWOOD CORE DESIGN NO. 00059 • II. Offsite Analysis , . A. UPSTREAM DRAINAGE There are no upstream tributary areas draining onto the site. Runoff from NE 4th Street right-of-way drains to the west along the south side of the road and flows offsite to the west. Runoff from the adjacent parcel to the east is intercepted by an existing ditch along the adjacent gravel driveway and flows south onto the Maplewood property. This proposed development will not change either existing upstream drainage pattern. B. ON-SITE DRAINAGE Stormwater runoff on-site generally flows in a southwesterly direction over the existing terrain and is tributary to the Maplewood property to the west and south. C. DOWNSTREAM DRAINAGE Runoff from Amberwood drains onto the Maplewood Property site. The Maplewood Property project will construct single family lots along the west and south sides of Amberwood. A 12"storm drainage line from the new Maplewood storm drainage system will be stubbed to the west property line, approximately 110 feet north of the southwest corner of the Amberwood Property. As mentioned earlier,the Maplewood Property is currently under construction. The storm water runoff from the Amberwood Property is conveyed approximately 3500 feet through the newly constructed storm drainage system of the Maplewood Property. The Maplewood storm system discharges to a pair of 24" culverts located immediately south of the intersection of 1481 Ave SE and SE 136th St. The twin 24"culverts convey storm water to a grassy swale which runs southeast and then south for approximately 700 feet until it reaches a 30" CM?Pipe on the north side of the Plat of Briar Hills. • • II. Offsite Analysis (cont.) C. DOWNSTREAM DRAINAGE (cont.) This 30" CMP pipe directs the flows through the Plat of Briar Hills at varying slopes of 0.6 to 3.8% (see Figure 3 for Downstream Drainage Map). There is one"off-line" detention pond approximately 4900 feet downstream which is thoroughly grassed and shows no sign of recent inundation. The 30"inch CMP ultimately drains to another"off- line"detention pond approximately 5800 feet downstream near the south end of Briar Hills. This detention pond shows evidence of recently detained flows filling up the bottom 2 feet of the pond (the pond has seven feet of available storage). This pond releases to a rip-rapped discharge at the top of a natural drainage ravine. The ravine eventually discharges to the Cedar River approximately one and a half miles downstream of the subject property. The downstream flow path has no apparent signs of flooding or extensive erosion. ' . • . • :•,,,-.0fni.'••••:;'•'%r• •..:g , . „., :•,-.-.: ....:,.:-,w.,;,..=. .,6,:....••••• •,,••,.. \ . • .. _ . •• :.,...0,-Aile.,..,.....544-,.. ems:•,.....,.,-,.-.---.,. ..-1 i.,.• -.0:4-'''''•..•...44. --v&-...-...\-.....----) ."-*/*IP i Algigtaglog?. . . . . _• • • .411.111,Aktilini,01,i NCY1 TRIBOITARY •• .k'Mfm,04)A, L,___\ . 1`) . L E. 1 28T1-1. dt, ..e.13.,,stivisa450.4>„ • .,.4.7,,A.,„ ..„...,4,..:,>. ......e,,./....,,,,...,„ . "'v....4'A, , • :,,....z...,..;:.....,1•.;..7kcp. ;,,,,Iji...:-.,..Wttqt:. iiet.27..W. ........ . AtN-sr, — ,,,....110-2 ---,0:22f, ' 0.I45,.... ,,, .., .,:>#4. _ . ____,..-.L.....—•"-- _-_____. /._!.....:.:,..• ., T•-:•.•-•:•.-. •.••••• , ,t.),$.• -.•••, •••,,,,,,,. .....;..w.i...,..:,- •;M:M..nit„." • — .. .SEI; L IUTII Sr.- 1%...........41.'!44. LS. I 27"nr St I \.t. 131111aN • 7E 4-Th .. A a • • , V 11 • . . 1 •611111 ' . . . • . vg\PPI:.-.;_'- - ' 11.-_.-_..._:..I ' AM" rEieg____ . . . 6 • . .., . 4 . . • . • • . . . 1 . . • r‘I' . . ' 10."—-'-. : • • ••'- 1 . , 4 • il{or• ; -.1 . . . ... . . OS . ' . • I • .. . . . • r ie.- • . .. .... . • . . .i• !IP • . __________To _,,. isa•• . . • I • . " • . . . • • • % . • . . 0 • . . . . . . ,... . • . --. • . '••• .0. 'Z.. • L . .. . . . • ,.....,. . ....._____ . . . . , • . . . 11 • , i . •.MAI , . . . . . OA 1 0 )?.' • • • ' i INN 4 P t. • . . . . . . . . 4.... e . . . ,... . . • o .. __• _. .--4a9.---1---:-.-..-a.... .r- .......... St 12ND ST • 4 ', tri . 11.31-7Z- • 1••••••• •n Im. (n • . . a i ..j ,▪ 44203 ..... 11 !. ...< ' . i 1 . 1 i I SS; 1 CIE'i /WAIL:'''', I. • 4. . ''. . a. . . 1 . 4 SP , 1 1____,..,,,__e_11 1 • • • 0 I E . • ri.e....e. fo e e .*°:.,.•-' •-• -. ".- -.1.a. .....54t.. . . • ill co -6; -11zi, _ . .. I. .. •. . . . . (IT. "c) . • _.- - . . . . . -74....i . . , . . . . • ti .Z.I. Er ' / • i 1 . . / I . . . / . ICJ • • .'".4%. • ilg ./ .. ad SP•7101111.••••01117. <or • . • . . . I, . • • :I . • .,.—Zruaar . I • I 1 1 • .• I i ., .. • . • • k i 1 I I • V a. • ti.•••.•so...1• • . . 1 . • • 11 . ' 1 / I( 1 case ci I . ii....rre . ,. . . ill • I ' . I' . . . . kil • . I ! • . 11 •I . .. . .' . . It hil t4 10Letaktip I . .1 . • •••./.••P•Vi•••••• ,J.I...y . 1..••• • NCR 444104 seomosi . . I ‘ • 00 ) • A.ra , •.0. tor a, . . • . 138144 •' • .._A.,., ..... fir 4 e..... \ , ..44fq IS DS TH ST wo-aa-fit" • -....--• •4HEIVOP.- • 1 Sairlria:37.11 iljttill IT ..'-until f.; i _ .• ____— ' 41- ' ••-•-•-•-ror .1 I,„rum si.1.•as.•i.:•.4:4 12.. ... - • 1114414... . . • . I... . . . . . . . . . . . . ' I'q fi, - , -0- .- 1. . ii . _..............wr_ _.................... . . 1 . • . .1 i. . rt.., • 4 • . . . &.., .__ ._._.. _.. .......... .. . ..... . .. .... .. .. ... .. . i• . . . • . uSilits-- . , . .. ,. . • a . mmmmmm a a I kl 30" CMP I %.-i- i ( . . f • • • , . . ;.....'...11, . I --.1.••• . t I . . • t • . , 1 . . . . nEllMill.1.1. ., ...E. .• Ms0.- • • • _- Is...1. • , ,..,._...._,..: • . 1 .. . , . . . . ... Igt.1414- ....i. .... •... ... ... su . __________ iii . , ..,. ........... .,..4... .... • . .4 ... .."' 4'. . . I .." • NV " - '. • . . • . P . - 4. 1111111111:1 . ,. . . , . ,, ...„ MIMI..I1 '"I MIN . WIN 10. bur 1 '4 4se ' . • . " 1 .' .' ;\Inag.Ili d • NI, I ,,,k „ . . 1 . . I . . . . . . . g _ Ai , _ ,1 ... r m. • .1 t: 1 ' i a ...I bi . u . . • I/ 1 , • ••••• ..". ,4tri, . 0 . ' .. •. . I ' "‘" - 1111" Ilk* I VI * i e . .. ... . .. • , ' -.- •.... , fh.: , .• . . • . ;10 - - ..__,. Led ,..'1 1 • : • .. . 1 triiill,..,.,141121 u " ` .• . . . . • 1 . c.t• 1 1 I • .• f) . . • ..,, JAZ=1111 0.! ..,-,. . • . .•......X.Jil •;Mu •••• .......----.4=1... .. . . .rkt..t. -- • • • • DETENTHON iiis . 1 • ' .n iiriAll:,• .5 Ing: -ern- 11 5 1 . . . . . . i , 0-411111M 17 " Ile . 41rdi . ° 144 r • .. •._ 6 : . • . • PONDS . " it! 401 - ' *X. - II .. . . . . mat--4-_-__:,..-,i , ._ .__-.-[ PA.fron - • . _.. e' . . i - NM IS ' ' -.1r:Trli'i • . • __.._ L. ._. ,..... . • F NOP 1 ii • - I . 1 ...-*• illigit al,••,-,,..'' ":1• Jsr tili . . a I . 111112 • wit rikil ',. 4.-/ 0•••....., RAVINE • ag . ,'. 1 Ili I . ,... , .. i . 443C lit 1* 1 ;01) . . . •. . . . . _..,... , inn plitott -,...---,: i6 .• , ... 1 .....,=-ftz- - ... ,:le r' ' • • . ..- , 2 i 8 .. _._,._iiggipl..,..3p1 . , . •,,,,.... • • , _.. . .... ,,,,,,,,,-.. c.L..), . . .. g „,,, __,_.i.-.. 11111P Mitt0 11111 irgotik . MP PM. . . - • . . . T . ..e. tt 0••3 r. 1 e.. . es . sip to its I si 1 ..• „II “ 45 - 4 0 . • .... . 1 AIL • ..4'0 me*4e...111* . . • 0 E MN 113.2.3.8 ......S•111••••••• ( . . T .... . . . ........•. . . . . • .... "4 ,. . . . . .. :. . .. • . . . . . o • o 0 : . . . . . • . • . • . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • .. • . . . .. . . . III. Flow Control and Water Quality Analysis and Design A. Hydraulic Analysis The drainage analysis was modeled using the King County Runoff Time Series software. The onsite soils are Alderwood,hydrologic group C and KCRTS group Till. See soils map included in Section 3 Offsite Analysis of this report. The site is located in the Sea- Tac rainfall region with a location scale factor of 1.0. Existing Conditions The site area is 4.7 Acres in size which includes 30 feet to the east which will be the 152nd Ave SE Y2 street improvements. The existing ground cover is 60%till-forest and 40%till pasture. The following information was used for generating time series and flow frequencies. EXISTING CONDITIONS Total Area=4.70 acres (00059existing) GROUND COVER AREA(acre) Till-pasture 1.88 • Till-Forest 2.82 Onsite existing conditions flow frequency analysis: PEAK FLOW RETURN (CFS) PERIOD 0.438 100 year 0.396 50 year 0.310 25 year 0.252 10 year 0.245 5 year 0.224 3 year 0.146 2 year 0.095 1.3 year 0.017 1.1 year -T_ • _ ____ _ • _N_.E_. _4TH ST._ __ _ • — —-�_n_ _ — -• N 88'21'18" W MEAS_ T~_y-2622.47 MEAS�^^ " T~— -— 1 297.80 01 -w ..• __._..__ _.__-ti__.._-- -.._,_.-___�_-._.� r-UaW FIBER OPTIC s,, off.^____-.__ _-•_,,,___ __r.i— __ d_FOG LINE. EDGE OF CONCRETE.IOAD __. __ 1 �..._. —. _27 _- '.z, s•_.:._. — G _ arc to \ ,9u •+u•--._•._.�FOUND-•1/2J_R.LBAR ) : / — Ii, •-• -r� e� o' 3� I ! i I '--t ti•, ,..�YPC-4DE1.282s�" r-- r—— �-———i r— r _ r 1 30l I I CORNER r� �� 1 1 ` I i 1 \ 1 i I rlJ� j m m1 I n ra l `O \1 til I Q I -- I N N �, CJ r \ GY0: P \ '13'T'19 I _ _ N C4 J: 3 7 3 t c 'n \�'` _...-N m\ L-- 47, r J °z I 'l u w I N.,~� is; r� I \ 2 S� �\ L+ , 115 r' j4 I G'l I ti ' 5. I 6 0 isb, r l �s I \ • \•\ 164SF. r.` 'ti 26as`6v... -r6•l5 6 \ m i ——— - �——1 • i 1 -- I ( . c� . a ,y �\ �, I \ I I a I › .' r i I I \�1 �`� I 1 \ 5 �I L 9\ L L__ J \ 1,,-\13648 y I I —Zr _ _ N. 0. P l 6�I —--Int - ______ -- -........r_. �_ �'� ''�� S . 128 PL. 1 ;�t ,l �` : A r 60 \ I .4r ____. ar_i_.___ 5��_ \, 6O tip; \ 6+ 90, \ I:� I� L.__ ... ._,___ 7.-:\ ,•, —— 'ti • I °u i I o''.„ .F. 'b.' '\I eci.. I, 1'``0 tit•` \ I l�> i �\t `'' + \' `' Ti dry,• >• �,ti ,„1, I f� 40 Igo ` ®•<< .-` ,ti 1 9 ;,r „„,. Id' ��' a. 1404 SF. r ,. e72G4F' a� r v 1ae 8F. a. Ig 74 ---,---� '+ 1 i•-„eL . , ��4 I ,Ru \. I I 3�a>1 .6 11 I �c• \,,�� ' I �U` 1^' t.,: , _.- 8� _' ""•'� L r 4 .I L _----t-J .��@t� 9-1,' --r �'• 1 I° @ ` �I�` / `'��o ILI It e Div'-m:• 2 ` :). r 1 1 ii::":"`..• i obi, •• �ti 42 • �. ,,: 1805 B.F. \ I ��1,I • y,d•:, j M I ,----I 11 1 r t I ( ` :—........... � v *.1 i f ny-!- rC,, 1 ,.4, 1 "_..,_..:r.`-1.i.. a I 12 SF. ,,1 RyjG ,�:1`aF 1 4' I �`�• X. S y9 0< k'- m m co °' .4• ,!,I N t IGUS r I I O �J • ------- 1 I \ 1 \I3 • _ - •' r r\ I i Z ~�� \-__. � .___.....484 �W} v^ I �� re 11 k •:t 8166,,SF. l _1..� • _T ' -�--(-- ` t d CA cU 1 I - __...__. ix 1\ 1808 SF. I c I ;,_ .. .. �::� "�'r . _ 1 I \\ •ti I 1 r 1 \ 6'AccessAm rry. A16,`4 �> I- 1 .:• , .11 1 11� — I _, I \ �'' ^?" � I ^\ �\ I EASEMENT f� c51 Oa CAR��ryf T,';I �GARACIE 11�4 SFI l .,(� 1 �� -� 1�' L _ _ f4 1 1 1 ear _ i }' Q 'r 120— —'Li - _ ' ' •r I __. 26' SFAITILI \ 1p� \\ \� ` �._ N- \ I .t:.e. '\ ago-----.. 17 ,..\ ,�\ '6". "'''' .--N.---'..\' `' N: 1 ss,,,A y ...� 1 d'• N., I I \, ti 1 I 1" dam, — -- —" O4. GAf7AC ilRpo r1t3 I I \ \ \• I lv. m w .\ ..••t1 1 —I _�-�� -� ,A Vic, F \11 18F i I I 834TI�P'F. �.\ \ _..,..7,)...I.7.7\7.__ -......,48 , --- rs://-2-o.EAra deirr . • v, \ so i/ 81 I3({ rJ 1 _ t• dam' n =. a.- of DR4INAGE TRACT .,-- le tualauttwo...,....);\ �� .� ma's \�9ae6 8F. `f \. , i-3.\ 0) 9621 SR r ,c, \ n by O r ? \. \,. y o N 88'16'96" --�� v,• ��' \' FOUND 1/2" REBAR I O ° o- W%YPC "pEl 28238" d O.1SOFCORNER I ' • 50 ..I 1 � ��J o I 0 c I • • • • • SHEET NO. 11 • KING COUNTY AREA, WASI • • (RENTON QUADRANG r o r " Am,. ISSAQUAH+2 MI. 10 —I 1 680000 FEET 1122 O�4 „.„) • ° \i �. — .. . • — • • • • AgD ••••• • •��� �•••• iiliane:g---. ii'. I ),. !., \ f : •gj • " 1'7 _-• • •a • AgCGtlrl • • C � ••f g • . •• • • s� 915 _ �9 '413 • Age • • '� • • i u: u•EvB • n • - • .= BM • I� ,� 'h . i . j . ® • , • • .11 '• 3 ' ?424 . ® • •I• • 15;5216 •�' . 1 ! . T 1 1 i • , "74 180 000 2 • ; .•... ■', ••■ •. ABC • • -• • . •% . 5 lT •` • • FEET / -Vcaaaaoa , . •� • - - II An • i •: •• _ • •..�� •VEL- I.PST J.1J 11 i �aJ •• . %.• . . :, 'y.� • ,• WA4i 21: 10 k. u I t •,I -I" :..,,---- • .... a�aoaoaa • �. 4 • ~^ .,` 14 soap I 1 :V al � � i •� �s •EC • iAkF I erA t �a w . .. -- •/ • �. . I • . • ' `' • • Ev8 I k 0• ,• AkF Rl �`` ' P y �/•�'1P Go/f •'` ' le I �� �- Co I �• ii EvB gip- - -\ AgC �/• `�6.......„.... .: I n• • -'�' � AkF ) ++• , --1, a__� ;9i �a, Ma • J:(" Vim` i /_4 _c\---.z..\\ g \ .‘ ,•• �� �i i E o • .•,1 \,_AkF_ =a ,4, 'I`ap" , .n�AIC/ i' I` �__ _ / Q�: Ma J _/ a�J as A Z1 � " ' �a a _� _ e % h \ Q�4,•\\ IV l :%,`` . 1 0 ova . 3jl �` i%J 'v AgC "I`aa ;`�•,AkF I u, a, a�(II I ` � F. u �°"a `,``o,`; AgC N� Park1 • PY n AqV�. 1% a. I ■ 169 ' �c o °� , 1 •■++tr C` -1`4- EvC In& AgD allAkF — ti — �,,, _a -- --■_ _ -- --- -- .-- ''\ --L73 • —s- milf ! I KING COUNTY • �• AgC `• Ate` s ll M BM 1 _� OILS MAP ratti_1__u an Ito AgB++ AMBERWOOD 1 +. 27 `Pme`116 ' ' 6— iCORE DESIGN NO. 00059 Ell A ' 3.2.2 KCRTS/RUNOFF FILES METHOD—GENERATING TIME SERIES •-:TABLE.3:2.2 EQUIVALENCEBETWEEN:SCS.SOIL TYPES AND"KCRTS SOIL TYPES SCS Soil Type SCS KCRTS Soil Notes Hydrologic Group Soil Group � Alderwood (MB.AaC.AQD) C Till Arents,Alderwood Material (AmB, AmC) C Till Arents, Everett Material (An) B Outwash - 1 Beausite(BeC, BeD, BeF) C Till 2 Bellingham (Bh) _ D Till 3 • Briscot(Br) D - Till 3 Buckley(Bu) D Till 4 Earimont(Ea) D Till 3 Edgewick (Ed) C Till 3 - Everett(EvB, EvC, EvD, EwC) A/B Outwash 1 Indianola(InC, InA, InD) A Outwash 1 Kitsap (KpB, KpC, KpD) C Till Klaus(KsC) C Outwash 1 Neilton (NeC) " A Outwash 1 Newberg (Ng) B Till 3 Nooksack (Nk) C Till 3 Norma (No) D Till 3 Orcas (Or) D Wetland Oridia(Os) D Till • 3 Ovall (OvC, OvD,OvF) C Till 2 • • Pilchuck(Pc) C Till 3 Puget(Pu) D Till 3 Puyallup(Py) B Till 3 Ragnar(RaC, RaD, RaC, RaE) B Outwash 1 Renton (Re) D Till 3 Salal (Sa) C Till 3 Sammamish (Sh) D Till 3 Seattle (Sk) D Wetland Shaicar(Sm) D Till 3 Si(Sn) C Till 3 Snohomish(Sd, Sr) D 711 3 Sultan (Su) C Till 3 Tukwila(Tu) D Till 3 Woodinville(Wo) D Till 3 Notes: • 1. Where outwash soils are saturated or underlain at shallow depth (<5 feet)by glacial till,they should be treated as till soils. 2. These are bedrock soils, but calibration of HSPF by King County DNR shows bedrock soils to have • similar hydrologic response to till soils. 3. These are alluvial soils,some of which are underlain by glacial till or have a seasonally high water table. In the absence of detailed study,these soils should be treated as till soils. 4. Buckley soils are formed on the low-permeability Osceola mudflow. Hydrologic response is assumed to be similar to that of till soils. 1998 Surface Water Design Manual 9/1/98 3-25 • SECTION 3.2 RUNOFF COMPUTATION AND ANALYSIS METHODS KCRTS Land Cover Types • KCRTS supports four land cover types:forest,pasture,grass,and impervious. These cover types shall be applied as specified in Table 3.2.2.0(below). C'?KCRTS:COVER.GROUPS `a�.r;����... . . . . .... .. ....... .. .......... . . . . AND AREAS ORAPPI;ICATIOAI . . KCRTS APPLICATION Cover Group Predevelopment Post-Development Forest All forest/shrub cover, irrespective of All permanent(e.g., protected by age. covenant or SAO designation) onsite forest/shrub cover,irrespective of age, CO 0 /b planted at densities sufficient to ensure 80%+canopy cover within 5 years. Pasture All grassland, pasture land, lawns, and Unprotected forest in rural residential ,cultivated or cleared areas, except for development may be considered half 7u lawns in redevelopment areas with pasture, half grass. predevelopment densities in excess of 4 DU/GA.. Grass Lawns in redevelopment areas with All post-development grassland and predevelopment densities in excess of landscaping and all onsite forested land 4 DU/GA... not protected by covenant or SASA designation(except in rural areas as noted above). Wetland All delineated wetland areas(except All delineated wetland areas(except cultivated/drained farmland). cultivated/drained farmland). Impervious(1) All impervious surfaces, including All impervious surfaces,including heavily compacted gravel and dirt compacted gravel and dirt roads, parking roads,parking areas,etc.,and open areas,etc.,and open water bodies, water bodies(ponds and lakes). including onsite detention and water quality ponds. (1) Impervious acreage used in KCRTS computations should be the effective impervious area (EIA). This is the gross impervious area multiplied by the effective impervious fraction (see Table 3.2.2.E, p.3-28). Non-effective impervious areas are considered the same as the surrounding pervious land cover. The following four factors were considered in specifying the above land cover types to be used in hydrologic analysis with KCRTS: • Cover types are applied to anticipate ultimate land use conditions. For example,probable clearing of woodland after development is nominally complete suggests that the post-development land use be specified as grassland(either pasture or grass)unless the forest cover is protected by covenant. • In areas of redevelopment,there are often significant changes between the predevelopment and post- • development efficiencies of the drainage system. For example,in conversion of low density residential areas to higher density land use, impervious areas prior to redevelopment may not be efficiently connected to a drainage system(e.g.,downspouts draining to splash blocks,ditched instead of piped roadway systems). These problems are addressed by defining an"effective impervious fraction"for existing impervious areas and by generally requiring predevelopment grasslands to be modeled as pasture land. 9/1/98 1998 Surface Water Design Manual 3-26 • • • SECTION 3.2 RUNOFF COMPUTATION AND ANALYSIS METHODS • FIGURE 3.2.2.A RAINFALL REGIONS AND REGIONAL SCALE FACTORS ST 1.0 ST1.0/ ST 1.1... y LA 0.8 LA 0.9 LA 1.0 LA ry°l. y I "I SNOHOMISH COUNTY ��� ▪tS;:14,,, :•..F. . ��y'`,'..CJR['f [+4o../ 'P v ..WNr6Lp .r��y�x¢,,L�t,,,, ^C`° •' ���.j c '5T-I vQV . , ^,✓ t^ • 1� KINO COUNTY 111 IF Yi d',7=.: .•a' ./ • .• 4i ..,'" ���;f 6.Y `•yfil r ` a�x'dt'`w?�•:.S+.F`` ..'," f ;, 1 u '---� _ s ,,lot..,.:j � r �•:as B� r� ','fie`.C' � :..���,,�., � • e: .d" 4,24 Rd at ,d .r'•i e''szo� ` � sk.°..' •t\ _,3`',. 'I.b,`gyp ,u" eH (,1''/ .. , n -*"ul�"''.p} /6�''2.:��� jz x1-.4v.. pit -ELEPT I, :IA , '',711.''''2 is��, 8 irk ,. F.'-'.a* x C.7-�''�` �"! F a.s V 4 k n,,.,..-$vR...:.,,,, 4, , IN• ..II� r-. - • • `'y��'>'• `�C'Sf ` 9 � � • ." � I�' �� 0 �I'"° rs :�.- ; • A � �Ni :-, r . w� . :. moI tiiitik'l r-%,' .i..;!P, '/ iiiiiiik UNMI /17 ,.....,.1 Ilk• moray "7". 7 .. ti^Ci_ .1- -509• fie. .--- / c,t'..:.:t'}... x• �'j�{+"f•fr '1 0 ��"'-..-..!i : 1�V i� • �. . ;' ��a�- 7''+ i a :�. , LANDSBURG ±5 x�'• ? ir��' a ' g it • Ir 9 1 s7.•Y W! .r.�',S••,:x ,�=. 13'.t'�T::-?A:4,. S�5 ��,� s a ri +L �zi �CA '�,U • "a'' • o�i 1 . • ffkk —; • 518 S'i+' 4 Y 2q:iig iN.E'n'i- EV:yI 99 I .r ! ti x i2^s^^.�. ,"" • xar4`.;'v d d''oo,• r p_ i �IlRluw re--. �" r` • 1 ! IC • ST1.1 -'. :4.'l.11 a; .'y,,6 „ ll r 1111i , • ;OMNI • ,r'Ks N`O'CO UNTY` PIRC6 COUNTY • ST 1.0 f ST1 1� Rainfall Re gions and LA0'.8 0/ . Regional Scale Factors LA 0.9 1-A1.2 . 7 Incorporated Area ? LA 1.0 River/Lake Major Road • 9/1/98 1998 Surface Water Design Manual 3-22 • Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:00051existincf.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- Flow Frequency Analysis Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob (CFS) (CFS) Period 0.310 2 2/09/01 18:00 0.438 1 100.00 0.990 0.095 7 1/05/02 16:00 0.310 2 25.00 0.960 0.252 3 2/28/03 3 :00 0.252 3 10.00 0 gnrL, 0.017 8 3/24/04 19:00 0.245 4 5 .00 0.800 0.146 6 1/05/05 8 :00 0.224 5 3 .00 0.667 0.245 4 1/18/06 20 :00 0.146 6 2 .00 0.500, 0.224 5 11/24/06 4:00 0.095 7 1.30 0.231 0.438 1 1/09/08 9:00 0.017 8 1.10 0.091 Computed Peaks 0.396 50.00 0.980 Developed Conditions The developed site will consist of 19 single-family residences with associated roadway and utilities The impervious area was calculated using the criteria in the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual page 3-27 which states that 4000sf of impervious per lot should be assumed. All other impervious surfaces were measured by a planimeter. D. Impervious Area Delineation Onsite road and sidewalk 34,700 sf Impervious area of lots (4000sf*19lots) 76,000 sf Total impervious area 110,700 (2.54 acres) The input used for the KCRTS analysis is summarized in the table below: DEVELOPED CONDITIONS Total Area=4.70 acres (99102dev). GROUND COVER AREA(acre) Till-Grass (Landscaping) 2.16 Impervious 2.54 Onsite developed conditions flow frequency analysis: PEAK FLOW RETURN (CFS) PERIOD 1.66 100 year 0.978 25 year 0.976 • 10 year 0.856 5 year 0.815 3 year 0.809 2 year 0.673 1.3 year 0.641 1.1 year y. ` Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:00059deve .4pPrl tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- Flow Frequency Analysis Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob (CFS) (CFS) Period 0.809 6 2/09/01 2:00 1.66 1 100.00 0.990 0.641 8 1/05/02 16:00 0.978 2 25.00 0.960 0.976 3 2/27/03 7:00 0.976 3 10.00 0.900 0.673 7 8/26/04 2:00 0.856 4 5.00 0.800 0.815 5 10/28/04 16:00 0.815 5 3.00 0.667 0.856 4 1/18/06 16:00 0.809 6 2 .00 0.500 0.978 2 10/26/06 0:00 0.673 7 1.30 0.231 1.66 1 1/09/08 6:00 0.641 8 1.10 0.091 Computed Peaks 1.43 50.00 0.980 B. Detention Routing Calculations The detention/water quality facility will be a combination water quality and detention pond. The facility will be designed according to the Sept. 1998 KCSWDM. The detention portion of the pond will be sized according to a Level 1 Analysis (Conveyance Protection) using the KCRTS software. The attached printouts show that the required live storage is approximately 28,300 cf. The volume of the preliminary pond shown on the preliminary grading and utility plan is at least the required volume. 1. .' Retention/Detention Facility Type of Facility: Detention Pond Side Slope: 3.00 H:1V Pond Bottom Length: 83.45 ft Pond Bottom Width: 41.72 ft Pond Bottom Area: 3482. sq. ft Top Area at 1 ft. FB: 9284. sq. ft 0.213 acres Effective Storage Depth: 5.00 ft Stage 0 Elevation: 472.00 ft (Storage Volume: 28296. cu. ft, 0.650 ac-ft Riser Head: 5.00 ft Riser Diameter:- 12.00 inches Number of orifices: 2 Full Head Pipe Orifice # Height Diameter Discharge Diameter (ft) (in) (CFS) (in) 1 0.00 1.72 0.180 2 3 .60 1.50 0.072 4.0 Top Notch Weir: None Outflow Rating Curve: None - Stage Elevation Storage Discharge Percolation Surf Area (ft) (ft) (cu. ft) (ac-ft) (cfs) (cfs) (sq. ft) 0.00 472.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.00 3482. 0.02 472.02 70. 0.002 0.011 0.00 3497. 0.04 472.04 140. 0.003 0.015 0.00 3512. 0.05 472.05 175. 0.004 0.019 0.00 3519. 0.07 472.07 246. 0.006 0.022 0.00 3534. 0.09 472.09 316. 0.007 0.024 0.00 3550. 0.11 472.11 388. 0.009 0.026 0.00 3565. 0.13 472.13 459. 0.011 0.029 0.00 3580. 0.14 472.14 495. 0.011 0.031 0.00 3588. 0.24 472.24 857. 0.020 0.040 0.00 3664. 0.34 472.34 1228. 0.028 0.047 0.00 3741. 0.44 472.44 1606. 0.037 0.054 0.00 3819. 0.54 472.54 1992. 0.046 0.059 0.00 3898. 0.64 472.64 2385. 0.055 0.065 0.00 3977. 0.74 472.74 2787. 0.064 0.069 0.00 4057. 0.84 472.84 3197. 0.073 0.074 0.00 4138. 0.94 472.94 3615. 0.083 0.078 0.00 4219. 1.04 473.04 4041. 0.093 0.082 0.00 4302. 1.14 473 .14 4475. 0.103 0.086 0.00 4385. 1.24 473 .24 4918. 0.113 0.090 0.00 4468. 1.34 473.34 5369. 0.123 0.093 0.00 4553. 1.44 473.44 5828. 0.134 0.097 0.00 4638. 1.54 473.54 6296. 0.145 0.100 0.00 4724. 1.64 473.64 6773 . 0.155 0.103 0.00 4810. 1.74 473.74 7258. 0.167 0.106 0.00 4897. 1.84 473.84 7752 . 0.178 0.109 0.00 4985. 1.94 473.94 8255. 0.190 0.112 0.00 5074. 2.04 474.04 8767. 0.201 0.115 0.00 5164. v I q; 4• 2.14 474.14 9288. 0.213 0.118 0.00 5254. 2.24 474.24 9818. 0.225 0.121 0.00 5345. 2.34 474.34 10357. 0.238 0.123 0.00 5436. 2.44 474.44 10905. 0.250 0.126 0.00 5529. 2 .54 474.54 11463 . 0.263 0.128 0.00 5622. 2.64 474.64 12030. 0.276 0.131 0.00 5715. 2.74 474.74 12606. 0.289 0.133 0.00 5810. 2.84 474.84 13192. 0.303 0.136 0.00 5905. 2.94 474.94 13787. 0.317 0.138 0.00 6001. 3 .04 475.04 14392. 0.330 0.140 0.00 6098. 3.14 475.14 15006. 0.345 0.143 0.00 6195. 3.24 475.24 15631. 0.359 0.145 0.00 6293. 3.34 475.34 16265. 0.373 0.147 0.00 6392. 3.44 475.44 16909. 0.388 0.149 0.00 6491. 3.54 475.54 17563 . 0.403 0.152 0.00 6591. 3.60 475.60 17961. 0.412 0.153 0.00 6652. 3.62 475.62 18094. 0.415 0.153 0.00 6672. 3.63 475.63 18161. 0.417 0.155 0.00 6682. 3 .65 475.65 18295. 0.420 0.158 0.00 6703. 3 .66 475.66 18362. 0.422 0.161 0.00 6713 . 3 .68 475.68 18496. 0.425 0.166 0.00 6733 . 3 .69 475.69 18563. 0.426 0.171 0.00 6743. 3 .71 475.71 18699. 0.429 0.175 0.00 6764. 3.72 475.72 18766. 0.431 0.177 0.00 6774. 3.74 475.74 18902. 0.434 0.179 0.00 6794. 3.84 475.84 19586. 0.450 0.188 0.00 6896. 3.94 475.94 20281. 0.466 0.195 0.00 7000. 4.04 476.04 20986. 0.482 0.202 0.00 7103. 4.14 476.14 21702. 0.498 0.209 0.00 7208. 4.24 476.24 22428. 0.515 0.215 0.00 7313. 4.34 476.34 23165. 0.532 0.220 0.00 7419. 4.44 476.44 23912. 0.549 0.225 0.00 7526. 4.54 476.54 24670. 0.566 0.231 0.00 7633. 4.64 476.64 25439. 0.584 0.236 0.00 7742. 4.74 476.74 26218. 0.602 0.240 0.00 7850. 4.84 476.84 27009. 0.620 0.245 0.00 7960. 4.94 476.94 27810. 0.638 0.249 0.00 8070. 5.00 477.00 28296. 0.650 0.252 0.00 8137. 5.10 477.10 29116. 0.668 0.564 0.00 8248. 5.20 477.20 29946. 0.687 1.130 0.00 8360. 5.30 477.30 30788. 0.707 1.870 0.00 8473. 5.40 477.40 31641. 0.726 2.660 0.00 8587. 5.50 477.50 32505. 0.746 2.950 0.00 8701. 5.60 477.60 33381. 0.766 3 .210 0.00 8816. 5.70 477.70 34268. 0 .787 3.440 0.00 8932. 5.80 477.80 35168. 0.807 3 .670 0.00 9049. 5.90 477.90 36078. 0.828 3 .880 0,00 9166. 6.00 478.00 37001. 0.849 4.070 0.00 9284. 6.10 478.10 37935. 0.871 4.260 0.00 9403. 6.20 478.20 38881. 0.893 4.440 0.00 9522. 6.30 478.30 39839. 0.915 4.610 0.00 9642. 6.40 478.40 40810. 0.937 4.780 0.00 9763. 6.50 478.50 41792. 0.959 4.940 0.00 9884. 6.60 478.60 42787. 0.982 5.100 0.00 10007. 6.70 478.70 43793. 1.005 5.250 0.00 10130. 6.80 478.80 44813 . 1.029 5.390 0.00 10253. 6.90 478.90 45844. 1.052 5.540 0.00 10378. • y II. y • .L 7.00 479.00 46888. 1.076 5.670 0.00 10503. Hyd Inflow Outflow Peak Storage Target Calc Stage Elev (Cu-Ft) (Ac-Ft) 1 1.66 ******* 1.16 5.20 477.20 29985. 0.688 2 0.81 ******* 0.58 5.10 477.10 29144. 0.669 3 0.98 0.25 0.25 5.00 477.00 28295. 0.650 4 0.86 ******* 0.24 4.73 476.73 26127. 0.600 5 0.98 ******* 0.23 4.54 476.54 24649. 0.566 6 . 0.82 0.15 0.15 3 .55 475.55 17618. 0.404 7 0.64 ******* 0.13 2.44 474.44 10884. 0.250 8 0.67 ******* 0.11 1.88 473.88 7971. 0.183 'I , r C. Water Quality Volume Calculations Based on the location of the site, "Basic Water Quality Treatment"is required for sizing the wetpond. The required volume of dead storage will be designed per KCSWDM Section 6.4.1.1. The following variables were used in the calculation: Volume Factor(f)=3 Rainfall=0.039 feet or 0.47 inches Where A;= area of impervious surface=2.54 Acres= 110,700 sf Atg= area of till soil covered with grass=2.16 Acres= 94,090 sf. Vr=[0.9A;+ 0.25Atg] x (R/12) Vr=[(0.9)(110,700)+(0.25)(94,090)]0.039=4803 CF Vb=f*Vr=3(4239.5) = 14,409 CF The volume provided in the pond shown on the preliminary grading and utility plan is at least this required amount.