HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA78-120 BEGINNING
OF FILE
FILE TITI45#Agt (11414a,
/1C:
MiCOFILMED
,,t 0 9
�}•
I nv,o is e.No,
CITY OF RENTON
• 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH
RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055
•
CITY CLERK
Department or Division
Date May 2 , 1978
r
Please make checks
Douglas A. Weston payable to
21318 - 109th Ave. S . E . Finance Department
Kent, Washington 98031
City of Renton
•
Recording Fees fir the following document filed with King
County Records & Elections Department:
Short Plat ( file No. Sp-120-78 ) $10. 00
Recording No. 7804269008
•
Total Due s1o. 00
' ) '
DISTRIBUTION ^moumr KING COUNTY RECORD DEPARTMENT i
| c°nx�� Copies | �
i m */warom
--1
Searching Records
Seattle,.
`/"= Sat
isfactions
|
'm" RECEIVED from
10el DOLLARS
For
=
' Nc�
^ *'
'~^ w ~~
-
�
�
�
�� `
. .. ._. .....
... _. . ..._ . . ._ ...... __._ _ ._ ._... . ..... . . .. ._ _ .. . . . .. ...
_ . . ,. ......
.•• .
. _•• . .
. .
. . . . . . .
. .
•
. . .
. ,. .. .
, . .• ;. •. . .. -
.. ,
. . .
- ; ._ • . . . .
. •
, . ..• .
- • .
. . ..,2..
. .
• .
, .
. .
, , : , . 7 L .:, •... • •
. . .. •
. . .. ..
. ., .
. •
. .
. .
.: .
, . CITY OF RENTON
; . .
. , NO 3721
• ,,,, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
•
PERMIT NO. RENTON, WA. --V-? 4
•.-.) / • , 1 9 7,P7
. , .
. . .
RECA I VED OF
\ 4 ?A.A./
/
(./..111-21.---- ..,./;/(LA-A-'4..2--(..---/Ci (1/1" ZA--e.: XL/1-4--1,--d-4•4 C-7/.....A )/ ----
4‘1 DOLLARS
. ,
-1.
&iv-4- -C•
4 .„....-:- 1 , . .. . . PLANS. DEPOSIT.. . .
. . ...., • , ;
. 1. t .......
K' . ,,,1-4
. - ..... . , .
/- 4A MAPS
. LP-4 •
*/
POSTAGE
. , Cifr f.P-11/ 0/4,s•1/- R o'itr e
.; : • ,
MISCELLANEOUS
• / /5"-C:
., . . .
TAX
... . ,
I I. ,
TOTAL . - //,.5-C
:BY
. 96-1-
. .
. . . ,
, .
•. • .
. ... , .. .
. .• •
, . .
. . .• .
, . • ..
. ., . . •
. .. .:. •
."--..., •
- -.... • • .. ......
, . , . .........._.... , .. ....- . _ -_.• .-,.,• -
, - ...... . ...
. , . t • :. .
0 .
. .
.
. , •
.
. ,
• -
, . •
. . •. . .
. • , ..• . .
. , .
' .
. .. .
. 1. • .
. :, .
. . 1 . e
•
•
. ..
. ..t
I .
THE CITY OF RENTON
C> �i O
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
2 O
-- CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
p <c,Q- L. RICK BEELER , 235-2593
4).160 SEPIE °
March 1, 1978
Mr. Douglas A. Weston
21318 109th Avenue S.E.
Kent, WA 98031
RE: Short Plat #120-78, E-121-78.
Dear Mr. Weston:
This is to notify you that the above referenced requests, which were
approved subject to conditions as noted on the Examiner's report of
February 14, 1978, have not been appealed within the time period set
by ordinance, and therefore, this application is considered final
and is being submitted to the City Clerk effective this date for
permanent filing.
Please contact the Planning Department for information regarding
preparation of the final short plat mylar for filing with King County.
Sin -
�•'r ate_
•
L. Rick Beeler
Hearing Examiner
cc: Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director
Del Mead, City Clerk
� OF •ti
41 O THE CITY OF RENTON
V ci al 7. MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
z o
p — CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
L. RICK BEELER , 235-2593
o,Q4TED SEP1*7O
February 22, 1978
Mr. Douglas A. Weston
21318 109th Avenue S.E.
Kent, WA 98031
•
RE: Short Plat No. 120-78
Dear Mr. Weston:
As I clarified in our previous conversation, my decision of
February 14, 1978 required a 20-foot pipestem for Lot B along the
southerly property line. No restrictions'were placed on the
common lot line separating Lots. A and B other than what normally
would be necessary to comply with the minimum lot size and area
criteria as a result of the pipestem configuration.
I hope this clarifies for you my decision.
Res.- full
f
,��
L. Rick Beeler
Hearing Examiner
cc: Planning Department •
February 21, 1978
L. Rick Beeler
Land Use Hearing Examiner
Renton Municipal Building
Renton, Washington 98055
Re: Short Plat 120 78
Dear Mr. Beeler,
Would you please send me a letter outlining our recent
discussion confirming your approval of a 135 foot depth for
lot A and 165 foot depth for lot B of the above referenced
short plat.
Your prompt response will speed the finalizing of this
short plat.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
4a21-16:Zia
s A. Weston
21318 109th Ave. S.E.
Kent, Washington 98031
RECt1VEO
CITY OF RENTON
HEARING EXAMINER
FEB2 2157g
PM'
'AiR11.1O RLI,: ,.3,4,5,6
Ai
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
State of Washington)
County of King
Marilyn J. Petersen , being first duly sworn, upon
oath disposes and states:
That on the 14th day of February , 19 78 , affiant
deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope
containing a decision or, recommendation with postage prepaid,
addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled
application or petition.
„dam
Subscribed and sworn this ��� T day of �Q. o m-i
19 .
at)A- H(\ • k-Ekt'
Notary Public in and for the State
of Washington, residing at Renton
Application, Petition or Case: Douglas A. Weston, Short Plat 120-78, E-121-78
(The minutes contain a £,iist the pantLm of necond)
cl
February 14, 1978
OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
CITY OF RENTON
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION,
APPLICANT: Douglas A. Weston FILE NO. Short Plat 120-78
E-121-78
LOCATION: 424 Renton Avenue South
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant requests the approval of a proposed two (2)
lot short plat, and an exception to the Subdivision Ordinance
to allow a ten (10) foot pipestem together with a ten (10)
foot public alley to provide access to a proposed back lot.
The applicant also proposes to pave the ten (10) foot alley.
SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions.
Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval with conditions.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department staff report was received by the
REPORT: Examiner on January 24, 1978.
PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining
available information on file with the application, and
field checking the property and surrounding area, the
Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as
follows:
The hearing was opened on January 31, 1978 at 9:42 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the
Renton Municipal Building.
Parties wishing to testify were sworn.
It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed
the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1.
Michael Smith, Planning Department, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following
additional exhibits into the record:
Exhibit #2: King County Assessor's Map
Exhibit #3: Short Plat Map with staff comments
Exhibit #4: Short Plat Map as submitted
Exhibit #5: Letter from Mr. Weston, dated
January 13, 1978.
Mr. Smith referred to Section 0.2 and 0.4 of Exhibit #1 regarding recommended lot sizes
and noted that although both lots exceed minimum square footage requirements, lot lines
between Lots A and B should be shifted eastward to correspond with the subdivisions and
structures to the north and create a more balanced lot configuration of 150 feet in
depth and preclude the possibility of further subdivision of Lot B. Regarding the
subject of pipestem access denoted in Section 0.6, Mr. Smith referred to a recommendation
for additional paving to provide suitable fire. vehicle access. The Examiner asked for
testimony from the Fire Department representative. Responding was:
Ed Wooton
Renton Fire Department
Mr. Wooton reported departmental requirements for a 16-foot paved width of easement on
either the south or north boundary alternative recommended in the Planning Department
report.
The Examiner called for a recess at 10:00 a.m. The meeting was reconvened at 10:15 a.m.
The Examiner asked the applicant if he concurred in Exhibit #1. Responding was:
Douglas Weston
21318 109th Avenue S.E.
Kent, WA 98031
1 }
Sh. P1. 120-78 Page Two
E-121-78
Mr. Weston reported that he did not concur in the report completely, and indicated that
as a result of discussions with an adjacent neighbor to the north of the site he wished
to offer alternative suggestions for the access proposal, including paving a 10-foot
strip on the northern boundary designated for landscaping and utilizing it as a private
driveway to the rear lot or revising the access to the south boundary of the property to
provide a 20-foot access. He also stated a preference for providing only 10 feet of
paving for either alternative per current ordinance requirements, and noted that a rock
retaining wall could be constructed on the northern boundary to provide screening. He
objected to the recommendation for revising lot depths to 150 feet and indicated that
although he would be willing to revise the lot depth configurations to 135 feet for
Lot A and 165 feet for Lot B he preferred retaining Lot B in a larger configuration. He
also indicated willingness to provide landscaping and screening within reason for either
access alternative and noted the existence of a fire hydrant on Renton Avenue South
which may interfere with proposed access paving.
The Examiner asked for testimony in favor of the application. There was no response.
The Examiner asked for testimony in opposition to the request. Responding was:
Claude Rogers
420 Renton Avenue South
Renton, WA 98055
Mr. Rogers reported being the owner of the property just north of the subject site. He
advised that the 10-foot easement on the north side of the proposal had originally been
dedicated to the city but had been maintained by himself for the past 18 years. He
noted that the land consists of sand and gravel covered by approximately one foot of
soil, and suggested that retaining walls be utilized to prevent erosion. He also advised
that because current heavy traffic created safety hazards and noise, he favored expansion
of the easement and creation of a public street.
The Examiner asked for further testimony in opposition to the request. There was no
response. The Examiner asked Mr. Wooton to respond to previous testimony regarding
easement width. Mr. Wooton indicated that because of the width of fire equipment and
the possibility that the easement may be blocked by parked cars, a 15-foot paved width
was necessary. Mr. Weston advised that if a driveway were installed on the south
property line leading to a single lot, 10 feet of paving met ordinance requirements. Mr.
Wooton responded that the proposal for paving was acceptable to the department if proper
width in the total easement was provided for fire vehicle access. In response to the
Examiner's inquiry regarding minimum pipestem width beyond 10 feet, Mr. Wooton indicated
a requirement of 12 feet in width. Mr. Weston stated that if the alternative on the
south side of the property were approved, he preferred a 20-foot easement narrowing to
10 feet at Renton Avenue South adjacent to the Cedar River Pipeline right-of-way. Mr.
Smith preferred a recommendation for a 15-foot easement along Renton Avenue South which
would still allow for a 50-foot lot frontage at that location. . The Examiner asked Mr.
Wooton for his final recommendation on the proposed easement width and location. Mr.
Wooton advised that the Fire Department would have no objection to allowing a 5-foot
setback on the proposed 20-foot easement which would provide 15 feet of maneuvering
space for fire vehicles.
In response to the Examiner's inquiry regarding the possibility of gaining vehicular
access to connect perpendicularly to Renton Avenue South, Mr. Smith advised that the
City of Seattle is not amenable to granting an easement across the Cedar River Pipeline
right-of-way, and the proposal would create an easement onto a public street rather
than direct frontage onto a public street. Mr. Weston advised that he had contacted
the City of Seattle regarding access rights across the pipeline right-of-way and was
informed that without legal action it would not be possible. The Examiner expressed a
concern that because the right-of-way had been used,for public access for a period
longer than seven years, rights of access exist for all public use.
The Examiner asked Mr. Smith if the access proposal on the south boundary of the property
had been discussed with the Traffic Engineering Division. Mr. Smith indicated that
although the proposal had not been reviewed in detail, the division had been instrumental
in developing the ordinance relating to pipestem lots and the recommendation for a 20-foot
easement should meet with departmental approval. The Examiner questioned whether the
city would be amenable to vacating the existing dedicated 10-foot easement on the north
and indicated that he would research the matter along with the proposal for access on the
southerly side of the subject site with the Public Works Department prior to publishing
a recommendation on the request. He advised that all correspondence relating to these
inquiries would be incorporated into his report and transmitted to all parties of record,
and asked if parties in attendance at the hearing were amenable to this proposal. Mr.
Weston and Mr. Rogers indicated their concurrence in the Examiner's request.
•
Sh. P1. 120-78 Page Three
E-121-78
The Examiner asked Mr. Smith for final comments. Mr. Smith indicated that testimony
received from Mr. Rogers regarding creation of hardship for residents if access were
provided on the northern boundary of the site would revise the Planning Department
recommendation for a 20-foot access on the southern boundary. He also recommended
that further research be accomplished to determine whether the paved access width
should be 15 feet as recommended by the Planning Department or 10 feet as preferred
by the applicant on the western portion of the site fronting on Renton Avenue South.
He noted that the remainder of the easement should be of 20-foot width with a minimum
5-foot screening and landscaping strip along the south property line.
The Examiner asked for further comments. Since there were none, the hearing on
Item #Short Plat 120-78 and E-121-78 was closed by the Examiner at 10:50 a.m.
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter,
the Examiner now makes and enters the following:
FINDINGS:
1. The request is for approval of a two-lot short plat.
2. The Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues, applicable policies
and provisions, findings of fact, and departmental recommendations in this matter,
and is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference
as set forth in full therein.
3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental
Policy Act of 1971, as amended by R.C.W. 43.21.C. , a Declaration of Non-Significance
has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official.
4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the
impact of this development. (After closure of the public hearing the attached
memorandum of February 10, 1978 was submitted upon request of the Examiner in the
attached memorandum of January 13, 1978. )
5. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity.
6. The proposal is compatible with the required setbacks, lot area, lot size and lot
dimension requirements of Section 4-706 (R-1) of Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code
of General Ordinances.
7. A ten-foot public alley exists along the northern portion of the property. Including
the proposed two lots, four dwelling units would utilize this alley. One of the
existing homes is apparently a legal nonconforming use of more than one family.
8. The homes at 420 and 4201 Renton Avenue South are located approximately 10 feet or
so from the 10-foot alley. The home on the subject site is 17 feet from the alley.
9. Proposed Lot B contains 19,080 square feet (Exhibit #4) which is sufficient area
for two lots.
10. At present. the 10-foot alley is mostly unimproved, and what paving that exists is
inadequate for the traffic on the alley.
11. Dedication for public right-of-way along the northwesterly approximate 85 feet of
the property is limited to 12 feet (5-foot setback_ from the existing house) . The
total dedication would be 22 feet, including the alley, which does not meet the
minimum requirement of 50 feet per Sections 9-1108.7.H and K and 9-1108.23. (5) .
Along the remainder of the property a dedication is limited to 26 feet due to a
minimum lot depth of 80 feet per Section 9-1108.23.F. (b) , for a total of 36 feet
.of alley width.
12. The property owner immediately north of the existing residence on the subject site
complained about the traffic noise occurring on the alley.
13. A title insurance policy was submitted by the appliant in the application file.
(Section 9-1106.3.H. (6) ) .
14. Certification by a licensed land surveyor was not submitted per Section 9-1106.3.H. (3) .
15. Certification by the King County Health Department and the King County and City of
Renton Finance Departments is normally made during final approval or recording of
the short plat. (Section 9-1106.3.H. (4) , (7) , (8) ) .
Sh. Pl. 120-78 Page Four
E-121-78
16. Improvements have not been deferred by the Board of Public Works per Section 9-1106.3.H.
(5) .
17. An Exception from the requirements of Section 9-1108.24.F. (d) (Pipestem Lots) was
requested.
18. Restrictive Covenants were not submitted (Section 9-1106.3.I.) .
19. In the attached memorandum of February 10, 1978 the Department of Public Works
recommended the southerly pipestem configuration and retention of the existing alley.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The proposal conforms to the Comprehensive Plan Goals and Objectives and Land Use Map.
2. Only two configurations of the proposed two-lot short plat are possible. Either
more property is dedicated for the alley to thereby increase'its conformity or a
pipestem lot is created along the southerly property line.
3. Dedication of additional property for the alley will not remove the nonconformity
of the alley for dedication of a complete public street of the required width. '
4. Sufficient property exists along the southerly property line to accommodate a conforming
pipestem except at the southwestern corner of the site. The intersection of a 20-
foot pipestem with Renton Avenue South creates an unusual width of the pipestem
(approximately 30 feet) due to the angle of Renton Avenue South. It seems
appropriate to require only the 20-foot pipestem width along Renton Avenue South.
Accordingly it is reasonable to taper the pipestem to Renton Avenue South because
of the unusual configuration of that street (Section 9-1109.1.A) and because the
public welfare or adjacent property will not be injured (Section 9-1109.1.C) . The
tapered pipestem will preserve the privilege of a normal, unobstructed front yard
that is typical for the area (Section 9-1109.1.B) . Undue hardship is not an issue
(Section 9-1109.1) , but the exception is a reasonable response to the specific
circumstances of this specific property.
An unidentified easement exists along the southwest property line abutting Renton
Avenue South which would also lie within the southerly pipestem. While it may be
assumed that this easement is for utilities, any decision to allow this pipestem
must be prefaced upon lack of interference with the decision by the easement.
5. Unless the northerly 10-foot alley is widened to accommodate the increased density.
resulting from the proposal, the southerly pipestem access is the only access point
which would enhance the existing conditions in the alley. The application possesses
insufficient property to comply with the minimum 10-foot pipestem width adjacent
to the alley. The homes that are located adjacent to the alley are uncomfortably
close to the pavement that would be created. Normally, such a distance would be
witnessed in a pipestem configuration serving only one lot, not three or four as
is potential in this instance.
6. In accordance with Section 9-1105.7 the final short plat map can be approved by
the Planning Department for conformance with the Examiner's decision.
DECISION:
Based upon the record, testimony, findings and conclusions, it is the decision of the
Examiner to approve a two-lot short plat of the applicant's property subject to revision
of the short plat map, Exhibit #4, to reflect the southerly pipestem configuration
contained in Exhibit #3.
Furthermore, it is the decision of the Examiner to approve an exception to allow less
than the required pipestem width on the southwesterly portion of the site in order to
permit tapering the pipestem per Exhibit #3 to a 20-foot pipestem width on Renton Avenue
South.
The Planning and Fire Departments shall approve the final short plat map per the above
decision.
ORDERED THIS 14th day of February, 1978. 111011.
4•
W PPP'
,„..._____ .
Ri k Bee er
Land Use Hearing Examiner
Sh. P1. 120-78 Page Five
E-121-78
TRANSMITTED THIS 14th day of February, 1978 by Affidavit of Mailing to the
parties of record:
Ed Wooton
Douglas Weston, 21318 109th Avenue S.E. , Kent, WA 98031
Claude Rogers, 420 Renton Ave. S. , Renton, WA 98055
TRANSMITTED THIS 14th day of February, 1978 to the following:
Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti
Councilman George J. Perry
Councilman Richard M. Stredicke
Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director
Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director
Ron Nelson, Building Division
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must
be filed in writing on or before February 28, 1978. Any aggrieved person feeling that
the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact,
error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably
available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner
within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request
shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner
may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper.
An appeal to the City. Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires
that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and
meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for
inspection in the City Clerk's office, first floor of City Hall, or same may be
purchased at cost in said office.
•
MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 10, 1978
T0: Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner
FROM: Warren Gonnason, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Short Plat No. 120-78; Exception No. 121-78
Douglas A. Weston
The Traffic Engineering Division has no objections to the alternate
short plat configuration that was presented by the Planning Department..
The proposed pipestem should be 20' min. width from Renton Ave. South
to the proposed site.
The city does not have any plans for the alley in terms of vacation
or expansion because it is necessary to provide access to the
existing properties.
PL:ad1
Attachment
RECEIVED..
env OF RENTON
HEARING EXAM11Et1
FEB1 h1g78
AM F,11
•
•
.► o THE CITY OF RENTON
CO�® MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AYE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
p °' CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
po L. RICK BEELER , 235-2593
O,DATED SE P1 t�®�
January 31, 1978
MEMORANDUM
TO: Del Bennett, Traffic Engineer
Public Works Department
•
FROM: L. Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner
SUBJECT: Short Plat No. 120-784 Exception No. 121-78; Douglas A. Weston
At today's public hearing concerning this application, the following issues
arose to which your department had not had an opportunity to respond or
comment. Rather than having a continuation of the hearing, all parties were
agreeable to submitting these questions to you for a written response.
•
1. The Planning Department presented an. alternative short plat configuration
which located the pipestem at the south property line. This pipestem
would continue along the south property line and parallel, to the Seattle
Cedar River Pipeline easement. At Renton Avenue South, the pipestem
would narrow from 20 feet to somewhere between 10 and 15 feet.
Is this alternative preferable to your department? If so, do you have
a recommendation as to the appropriate width of the pipestem at Renton
Avenue South?
2. Testimony was entered into the record that the 10-foot easement along
the northerly property line of the subject bite is, in fact, dedicated to
the city. Two properties are served by that "alley."
•
Does the city have any plans for this alley in terms of vacation or
expansion?
•
My decision regarding this application is due on February 14, 1978. Therefore,
your written response will be needed by February 8, 1978, but sooner if possible.
Th,. . Y
o • �445.
%ias,
L. Ric Beeler
RECEIVED
- CITY OF RENTON
HEARING EXAMINER
JAN 3 11978
PLANNING DEPARTMENT AM PM
71819110,11112111213141516
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER
di
PUBLIC HEARING
JANUARY 31 , 19? XHIBIT NO. --
.ITEM N®. ��? — -/�� ��
APPLICANT: DOUGLAS A. WESTON ,
FILE NO. : 120-78 , SHORT PLAT; E- 121-78 , EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISON
ORDINANCE
A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST :
The applicant requests the approval of a proposed two (2 ) lot short
plat , and an exception to the subdivision ordinance to allow a ten
( 10 ) foot pipestem together with a ten ( 10) foot public alley to
provide access to a proposed back lot. (Lot B ) . The applicant also
proposed to pave the ten ( 10) foot alley.
B. GENERAL INFORMATION :
1 . Owner of Record : DOUGLAS A. WESTON
2 . Applicant : DOUGLAS A. WESTON
3 . Location : 424 Renton Avenue South
4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is
available on file in the Renton
Planning Department .
5. Size of Property : ±. 7 acres .
6. Access : Via Renton Avenue South
7 . Existing Zoning : R-1 , General Classification District
Single Family Residential , minimum
lot size 7200 square feet.
8. Existing Zoning
in the Area : R-1 , Single Family Residence District
R-3 , Multiple Family Residential
9. Comprehensive Land
Use Plan : Single Family Residential
10. Notification : The applicant was notified in writing
of the Hearing date. Notice was
properly published in the Record
Chronicle and posted in three (3 )
places on or near the site. as requirdd
by City Ordinance. Notice was
distributed to the surrounding.
property owners .
C . PURPOSE OF REQUEST :
To allow subdivision of the subject site into two (2 ) single family
residence lots for future development of single family ''residences .
In order to allow such subdivision , the applicant is also requesting
an exception to • the.,.Subdivision Ordinance .
D . HISTORY/BACKGROUND :
The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance No . 156
dated in 1909.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING OF JANUARY 31 , 1978
PAGE TWO
RE : 120-78 , SHORT PLAT; E-121-78 , EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE
FOR DOUGLAS A. WESTON
E . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND :
1 . Topography : The site is level .
2. Soils : Arents , Alderwood (AmC ) , Runoff is medium , and the erosion
• hazard is moderate to severe. This soil is used for urban develop-
• ment.
3 . Vegetation : The majority of the site is covered by grass .
Approximately ten ( 10) orchard type trees are also on the eastern
portion of the site .
4. Wildlife : The existing vegetation of the site provides suitable
habitat for birds and small mammals .
5. Water : There is no surface water evident on the site .
6. Land Use : The land use of the site is divided between a single
family residence on the western portion and an undeveloped state
on the eastern section . The surrounding area is predominantly
single family residential in nature .
F . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS :
The area is primarily single family residential in nature.
G. PUBLIC SERVICES :
1 . Water and Sewer : An existing six (6 ) inch water main runs along
Renton Avenue South while an eight (8 ) inch sanitary sewer is
also located on Renton Avenue South .
2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per
Ordinance requirements .
3 . Transit : Metro Transit route 145 operates along Main Avenue
South to South Grady Way approximately one-third ( 1/3 ) of a mile
west of the site.
4. Schools : The subject site is located approximately one ( 1 )
mile to the north of Talbot Hill Elementary School and Fred
Nelson Middlle School and approximately three-quarters (3/4 )
of a mile to the south of Renton High School .
5. Parks : Phillip Arnold Park is within one-quarter (4) mile of
the subject site with Liberty Park and Cedar River Park located
within three-quarters (3/4 ) of a mile north of the site.
H . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE :
1 . Section 4-706 R-1 Residence Single Family
I . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR
OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS :
1 . Subdivision Ordinance , Section 9-1105 ; Short Subdivisions
2 . Subdivision Ordinance , Section 9-1108. F (3 )
3 . Subdivision Ordinance , Section 9-1109 ; Exceptions
4 . Comprehensive Plan , 1965 , Land Use Report , Objective 6 , page 18
;I,
•
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING OF JANUARY 31 , 1978
PAGE THREE "
RE : 120, SHORT PLAT; E-121-78 , EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE
FOR DOUGLAS A. WESTON
J .' IMPACT ON NATURAL SYSTEMS:
Minor
K. SOCIAL IMPACTS :
Minor
L . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION :
Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the
State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended (RCW 43. 21C ) ,
this proposal is exempt from the environmental assessment/threshold
determination process .
M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION :
A vicinity map and site map are attached .
N. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED :
1 . City of Renton Building Division
2 . City of Renton Engineering Division
3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division
4 . City of Renton Utilities Division
5. City of Renton Fire Department
0. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS :
1 . The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehen&ive Plan
which designates that site and surrounding areas as single
family residential .
2 . The proposal also exceeds the minimum lot size and dimension
requirements of the R-1 zone and subdivision ordinance.
3. The proposal is compatible with adjacent single family residential
uses and similar subdivision patterns in the area (section 9-1109
B and C ) .
4. The size of the property as it exists now is large enough that
the proposed short plat is a reasonable use of the land . Lot
A with the existing house is approximately 10, 900 square feet,
and lot B is approximately 19, 000 square feet. There is an
existing house located on proposed Lot A.
5 . The existence of a ten ( 10) foot wide public alley adjacent• to
and north of the north property line , provides access for the
two (2 ) residences located directly north of the subject ''site.
This situation together with the proposed two-lot short plat
will create a potential utilization of the ten ( 10) foot 'alley
by four single family residences .
6. Alt.hough pavement of the alley will improve access to other
lots presently utilizing the alley for access purposes , add-
itional paving should be required because several lots would
be served from the alley. An additional ten ( 10) feet of , the
pipestem should also be paved . See comments from Fire Department
Traffic and Engineering Divisions . This would provide suitable
width for ingress/egress and emergency vehicle access to the
subject site. However , there is an existing rock retaining
wall along the northerly property line of the subject site
which creates certain physical constraints for such additional
paving width.
::n.l.•&el/.rf.:.i•dlh-4-Z: ' .3G •R,4Aw-ic:c.6.4:L z a e .e,!!. - � +-!••�,r
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING OF JANUARY 31 , 1978
PAGE FOUR
RE : 120, SHORT PLAT; E-121-78, EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE.
FOR DOUGLAS A. WESTON
7 . The establishment of a fully dedicated and improved public
street to the site is not possible given the close proximity
of the surrounding single family residences , and existing
subdivision pattern for the area . (Section 9-1109. 1 . A)
8. The Public Works Department is reluctant to approve and thus
perpetuate the utilization of a substandard ten ( 10) foot
public alley for sole access to several residences . It is
their recommendation that the alley be vacated and a minimum
20 foot joint access agreement be established for all lots
served by the access , together with a minimum sixteen ( 16 )
foot pavement. The Fire Department establishes the minimum
width at twenty (20) feet as per the Fire Code: However,
because of the physical constraints of providing a twenty (20)
foot private access road to essentially all four (4 ) .lots
(2 existing on north and 2 proposed ) another alternative might
be to grant a more typical pipestem lot along the south property
line, and parallel to the Cedar River pipeline right-of-way
out to Renton Avenue South (Minimum twenty (20) foot width ) .
A minimum ten ( 10) foot paved access road would also be
necessary within the pipestem to serve the one lot with land-
scape screening along the 'south side to protect adjacent
properties . [Section 9:1108 . F . 3 . (d) ] . This way also requires
shifting of the lot line between lots A and B to compensate
for the area of the pipestem and also create a more balanced
lot configuration .
9. Utilities are available to the subject site. The proposed
subdivision is exempt from the application requirements of the
drainage ordinance (section VI ) . However, drainage plans must
be approved by the Public Works. Department prior to filing
the plat.
10. All off-site improvements exist along the property frontage
adjacent to Renton Avenue South .
11 . Screening should be provided along the side of the existing
residence adjacent any proposed access road .
12 . The lot line between lots A and B should be shifted eastward
to correspond with the subdivision and structures to the north
and create a more balanced lot configuration .
P . PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION :
Recommend approval of the short plat and exception as' requested
subject to :
1 . Provision of a pipestem and access via either the recommendation
of the Fire Department and Traffic Department or the alternative
recommendation in 0. 8 above.
2 . Final Public Works Department approval of utilities and storm
drainage plans .
3 . Provision of landscaping suitable for screening purposes along
the side of the access road to provide screening for the adjacent, :
single family residences .
4. Shifting of the lot line between lot A and lot B eastward1to
provide 150 foot lot depth for each lot per #12 above.
1
._. . ...... • . •
• Y 4o�
1,
L.
MILL aYe• 5• ,113 . . .
V• n 0 0 0 0 " 1301:1000041:3 ir, 13 a a r3 -.'. -
- a CI I I `�
aona 0 D00 00 aDa Dp , "i 003�'`'' . 0000 `
CeZAK AVE- 5• N.
- - -
a D a a El aEl, N Ah p 0 a a a o ❑ 2 _
. 1:3 r.,.
w -Fr��� D8,3A ® LI
CI 0 C� ❑ aE3 C7 ---- 0Ju .0 a i 0Q1 1:3
t.
geNroN Ave SO. _
-can 1% .•‘ : 41V 0 ti?..1 El .ig :13,' -9;1:1- . °tilt 0 13 -C:3
• (%* VI) .!!,:.c..::i!,.!,,,.!o, i .
• E1a00 r.,04, . :!!!!..i...!ii.:! ...:......:...!,!.! i. ,
• Z t 3 C:/) E3 13{121[? .4 . 1:411:' .
-3 i c %.1% \> /
vs Q _ -
. .2-4-1 1..' ?...' lift,. .
, z It 4 ' A ' I _. . • ,
Lji‘ 01 -- 0,,,,, Avg 5.
�+. _ •
. •
--' --- - I - ''q CI' .- - Fri
O I • . la . g -1
1 a m 1 m i 1 .
. • • ,„ -.
ROUTE SCHEDULE
- • ,
. .: PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE ROUTED
, , •
, PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR: '
REZONE . MAJOR PLA
SITE APPROVAL r,L2t)citas.$. L„..4s..s.rt›,...) -7 HORT PLAT At/Z-0 -7?
SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER
SHORELINE MANAGEMENT •
PERMIT OR EXEMPTION
AND RETURN TO. THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
. i .
WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE //2-3/7,
• . .SIGNATURE . .
OR , :,,
INITALfl DEPARTMENT ' APPROVAL DENIAL DATE '1
' •. . ,
. ,
. ,
T. R kF. T'G : 00(
F -,)
TING , /k1 . • . -.//i3/7tf'
. st_ottir
AIWA", (F ...)2E ---. , k.../ /12d7ei'', A" ,
/ HEALTH . .
. ,
, .. „ ?'--> • it - zss-7ari ,
•
REVIEWER 'S COMMENTS OR APPROVAL CONDITIONS :
11, se_er Affoiewo istAgoo • )
ii.i70,8 _( ) evz-ley• c:t2/4z.tr hee.44.)9,7ez cd4,577mfr2m:), croWN-4
, 4. CeSssi,e1(4. 4- i --- ..o270,4,07,..er /RIV e 9 e 4 rizr44,7
jeoRr,4.4-is 4,,,;-../ _fizz-etzcA;724,‹ Ae,v,4ie• irr,fie.-/--;?ce 4/4 01,4:/7" 46-ST
4.1,4pme
.2e) ' x '',Prer4r4A" '
' X4bies..5 e/t/Pimaci of S'Ziefie.ier(A/r nfe reolicAre.0 4 ovrar of flee:-
. /)PfiAerrrtes5 /1A W hi/ME /4 /11,i/#,A1‘ if4 de /3 'e"" die kar77c.4.4
ezrb?ref,vez.,'.1 1;-",40* ibrIri',>fAvi oieer-fe.f,,et, .4„..;7,/-At, .2.rO 'ieecei° 0/4-.1"4-41 • !
,,S-;-/ea C 714ted • !. .
PLEASE SIGN THE E . I .W . :
. .
.. .
i .
. ..
. .
'.\ , •
. . . . . .... . , .
-. . e.... . , .,... 1; ..
:,
. . . . .
. • .
. 'e ' I : ' • 1. :
. :
. . . .
' I
p I
• „ i
' . .,
. .p
: •1 '
' I I
•I
. , I, .
. p .
. i .• 1. P
. p .
I ,
. - t
ROUTE SCHEDULE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE ROUTED #112.
PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR: ..
REZONE MAJOR PLAT
SITE APPROVAL SHORT, PLAT
. SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER
SHORELINE MANAGEMENT
PERMIT 0R E X E M P T I 0 N n?Jl . G✓V41c/J iL,.X priapJ -WE-iZ/-7d?
AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE //z1/761?
SIGNATURE '
0R
INITA DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DENIAL DATE
BUILDI — /-2D-3ci .
• / r • ' TRAFFIC E , C i-Z4-!r'
/Y_ 1 ENGINEER'IN X • /Arbg" ;
. l i
li .
HEALTH • - . i •
REVIEWER 'S COMM TS OR APPROVAL CONDITIONS :
74. ..0444.- a fO f 40 p .44 ,et 4, 04 Wpi /
i I Ki f de S i rd. b /4e_ , - p.../7e.•4...w So /M.f•2•+.,. , ....._. . •
•
S 40.JI 6.e. .4.14.6.....g6. • •
'4TrACIISQ 44 0019
I r '..'3144! '436140'4441101 7.1101.9901,1.1*. ' '--- . I
is
I, .
f .
i
PLEASE SIGN THE E . I .W . :
j
1\,
, j,
! I
i j,
' i iI
•
1 a,,
' .i ! it ,!t
'. ( ,'.•
0 . •
. • /
re : m t K e 7" i rn
i,
FielP4 : PAv ta. i.v m 0 est ir". .
A
a: 5"If 0 er Astir 'Pr/ic•-7 ty•
... • . .
, ! . X ifecomm' e0,49 - NfIr 7gor z•vi7#416 ios
ALLEy .74/ 2/eArt,' i, pev,
(Mc Are° IWO "sm4r A _151WAT4 e Alsentedor
t
22 'I', 6 y16711 att / iegrilL._,00
g4_4gLKIAP_____L&___Z3211--A 9s5 1 ece
„ .„ _ _, ., „ •
SO4 ( 770N . "7:1/4)" ,(+10, Nd , .Eigs•losorriP„ oiicive-AP
ea P4veo 'IA,(7N ' AstPw4g.74- oil . 4410' !pa
"cot wier e61414Ara .deme47 7 e,
44A1 eArreig40A# 4rk7110 01,4E44/0"i_
/AV I cettrard.. Ala v a: costoo v 4 la , . Aro v. 1 AP•c '
, -
A 400,2 Ace Efr To .A44, zgo • :,
! ,
____ A eurrov G . egeREAT, oiNnit git s Ai.
. . ,
_ • i ,. - . ..,, ,_,. .... ._ . _ ,... ,
, eflui. 4 v•Adoexir, • ,
. I
r
; .
. - • - , ,
• ..,
, .
• . . . .. . .. . . .. . .. . „ . _. . . . : ,
. . •
• • -1 - , .._ ._ ., , „ . .. .
. ,
. :: • !;. : ii
• , .
. ,
,
, . .
• „ . ,.
. .
. . ,
. -
- .
. .
. .
. . i
. :
. .
• , .. :,.
. r
. • .. . c. . • ., ril
,
• . • i' ::,'"I' .'i 4:
;
•, .• ;
' f'•
. •il !"
: .
• .. t,:
. ' ,: .. , .. • • ,
0. .
. 1,
. .
, .. .
. .
. ,
. X•. .241117.4)4 d.y,:,#)r/Z' •
' ..
1 i
• '
Iref,oribolon• : L'acr.Y1. ',00...30.16...% .
' .
.
4 : ...241i ....," - A9 . .
..e..., / ......?e,
• . .
. . .:
, . .
. .
.. . . . _ .. . . .
....."
. .
. .. . ....... __. . . . .. .
.. .
. .
, ,. . /3.-go, (4 ) _ .../. .;„7.Z.,.. e,,.„, .......-t. tV • ,.....<
. .. . .
...
.
de,c4:57
.1 . 4v -4-e-:e.-/4 7 -4-c-i-,e4. cd•.-E.41Y--f.,. ..., ..-i !
I • - --"e. oy":---' -/-.7-0-14-1-41.
,,,c.44%.4 ,... . e."..7 7° 4.e.ed.„40,0, ...v.,..r.vg....-6,.....74 .. ..4.....--. . . . i
. 1
:.,
'- - . x../..,- 4.4.4,..-e„4„c, , • • .-...0,c,..4,0,,_c4.. .7f ...,1.4„„re .....€4.4 i
. , ..1 _ ‘4./..•-,-T. -74.10jd 1";., ,...4.L;lexce . .,.....,i• 5‹.
., /
. . . . x40.6 ....e.gmr...„../ ee,
•
./0". .
;
. .
,
__. . . . i.
7-47/'/"--'7 • _ do,. r4-7"--s"-/ "--4 / ,,.. ...--4- .. , 1 - • •
. ;.... . ..
771'411.1 .4"""or .' •••"41410"""r^-7 4 ....-ji-re.wkw-soiroweruitoor..v* .. 00°117 . I:
. /.1 /...44/1 • e .-....4- 024 / .144,.,...,_;,e e.Z......, ,
•
.,........ ..... . . . i , i.
.. .,_ . .
7.4.4....4. .. 17,40e ,416...„... ..,4 :,?.
/ 04, 4.4.4.040,9
........ _............. ••• ..4......3..., . ....L2SCI ,.
' . ----- - --- - 4 •1277.: ••
f
•
.. _. . ___ • -.
- . .
, . .
. ;
, •. . '
, . ..
•
. . , .
. . .
• • . -- • . . . . •
. . . .
. ,
• •
. .
. . . - •
. ;•. ,
. . , .
• .
. ) ..
.' . .
. . . . .
. . '
r • . . . • '
' • . ' i:
i .
. . •.. . f•
. .
. •
, . .
. . , I. ..
t :i, . • .
• . • Ir ' . '
. . .
1 .
• ! 'i' , .
. . 1
. •
. • . . , 1.
: . •
• •.
.
, .1 . :•
•. 1 1
. .
• .
. It
. ' .
• •.. . .
. . .
. , . • ,
. ,..- . .
. . •
o . .
• ; . .
1• .
•
, .
: 1 V
I ..
. . . 1
. , . .
I : . . It ' I 1 1,1. ' I •:. ,1,
1' 1,
'. • • II ' 1 ::t•: 1 : • . . .
. 1 . .
. ,
. , .
, 11 •:1 111
• I: 11 1: 1 i,.-..,1: .
' 1 .
• :1
. 1
, ': •1: 1 11 I t111 : ':,I
•. 111 :: • t
, !, !' ' 1• , p
• 1., ..: ,.., ) !:,
• 0
, . .• '.',.• I , I, .. :..: :: ':;. .
' I' :. i' I q: . ;•
I ,1
I.:1 . .:
.
.
:. I Ii ! i • :;•, :,• I,!." : • g
. .1
II
•.;
• !• .'i• • ! i":.'i.; , .
, ii I••!,::!,...1.4:• U :'f,,! ! P
. :' •:••• . ! ;'. ':, ''t!` l' "H' . . 1 , [1. i I::
- i. i - L�
Renton Planning Denartment
,iunicinal. ' iil?9_ng
200 r;°ill Avenue •So.
Renton', `, ashington 98055
Pe: Short Plat-424+ Rentor Ave.So.
Dear. Sirs:
I am in the nrocess of short platting the above referenced
property under the "pinestem" provisions of the Renton Subdivision
Ordinance. Due to the seventeen foot distance from the existing
house on the front lot to the north property line , I desire to
provide the tenty feet of access outlined in the ordinance by paving
the existing ten foot public alley to the north of the property and
deeding the ten feet adjacent to the north line to the rear lot for
landscaping.
I I.equest the approval of this pinestem subdivision with access
as described above for the following reasons:
The lots are quite large and have a great view potential which
can only be realized by pipestern development.
This method of development will not be detrimental to neighboring
properties, but rather :;ill provide paved access to the two houses
to the north.
The subdivision provide tvo vie.i lots and a new house that
will be an improvement to the area.
With these thoughts in mind, please speed the approval of the
requested short plat.
RECEIVED
CITY OF RENTON
HEARING EXAMINER
sincere'y, JAN 311978
;___„..„7
PM
Douglas A. ';estop OF I/‘ . e319o1001912e1 e2e3e4e5e6
2117.8 109th Ave. S.E. �� 05.\\IhQ_lent, ' ashington 8011 `,
DPP /
EXHIBIT NO.
ITEM NO. a.7'1. /zo -7r --i�i--767'
ft
•
111
CITY OF RENTON
X SHORT PLAT PLAT APPLICATION FILE NO. r.20 .— 7S:
MAJOR PLAT OF RF41 DATE REC' D. r•/, ./7 47
TENTATIVE V� RICFil/ 16
APPLICATION FEE $ /��/91/a-'d
PRELIMINARY RICE J ENVIRONMENTAL
FINAL JAN 13 1978 REVIEW FEE $
.15 ___ RECEIPT NO. 36 of
"9 � SM NO.
NG DE% PUD NO.
9PPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 7 :
L. Plat Name & Location 42/, Renton Avenue South
:a . No. Lots 2 Total Acreage anrox_ 3/L Zoning 'R 1
3 ., Owner norales A_ Rr Carol A. ?'!es_,on Phone 8v,,-2119
Address 21318 109th Ave. S.E. , Kent, Vdb.shington
p . Underground Utilities : Yes No Not Installed
Telephone ( ) ( x ) ( )
f
Electric • ( x ) ( ) ( )
Street Lights ( x ) ( ) ( )
Natural Gas ( x ) ( ) ( )
TV Cable •
( ._ . ) • . ( ) (. )
5. Sanitation & Water:
( x ) City Water ( x ) Sanitary Sewers
( ) Water District No . ( ) Dry Sewers
( ) Septic Tanks
j . Vicinity and plat maps as required by Subdivision Ordinance. 'I
. DATE REFERRED TO: a
ENGINEERING PARKS
BUILDING HEALTH '
TRAFFIC ENG. _ STATE HIGHWAY
!• FIRE COUNTY PLANNING
BD. PUBLIC WORKS OTHER
2 . STAFF ACTION:
TENTATIVE PLAT APPROVED DENIED
APPEALED' EXPIRED
2. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER'S ACTION: •
1 i
SHORT PLAT APPROVED DENIED
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED
FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED
1 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
s
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED • DENIED
FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED
2. DEFERRED IMPROVEMENTS :
DATE DATE BOND NO. AND
TYPE GRANTED EXPIRES AMOUNT
r Planning Dept .
PPV. 1/77
i
AFFIDAVIT
I, 6cc,;,c,%s A �.�/s n , being duly sworn, declare that I
am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the .
foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information
herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief.
• Subscribed and sworn before me
this <p day of .n,u , 19 '7a , -
Notary Public in and for the State, of -
Washington, residing at ,A,I, `(1,, „�
,L.c--1:_k- „:. 0 / SkunteDy_
(Name of :Notary-Public) 4/9/8/ (Sig ture of Owner)
a - n C //4/ /gyp `�i`� vP. .;.cr
(Address) - (Address)
(City) ' (State)
ef,S/ .2/?�
(Telephone)
' (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY)
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me
and has been found 't bet1/orough and complete in every particular and to
conform to the rut /s a e jations of the Renton Planning Department
governing the fi'.. iag O th 6 lication .
L
Date Received JAN 13 1918 , 19 By:
A
Renton Planning Dept . ,
2-73
111
Policy of Title Insurance
Issued by
Transamerica Title Insurance Company
hereinafter called the Company, a California corporation, for valuable consideration, and
subject to the conditions and stipulations of this policy, does hereby insure the person or
persons named in item 1 of Schedule A, together with the persons and corporations in-
cluded in the definition of."the insured" as set forth in the conditions and stipulations, against
loss or damage sustained by reason of:
1. Title to the estate, lien or interest defined in items 3 and 4 of Schedule A being
vested, at the date hereof, otherwise than as stated in item 2 of Schedule A; or
2. Any defect in, or lien or encumbrance on, said title existing at the date here-
of; not shown in Schedule B; or
3. Any defect in the execution of any instrument shown in item 3 of Schedule A,
or priority, at the date hereof, over any such instrument, of any lien or encum-
brance not shown in Schedule B;
provided, however, the;Company shall not be liable for any loss, damage or expense re-
sulting.from the refusal of any person to enter into, or perform, any contract respecting
the estate, lien or interest insured.
The total liability is limited to the amount shown in Schedule A, exclusive of costs incurred
by the Company as an incident to defense or settlement of claims hereunder.
In witness whereof, THE COMPANY has caused this policy to be authenticated by
the facsimile signature of its President, and its Secretary.
Transamerica Title Insurance Company
• ByeXii"" drelag4.4.17 President
By
Secretary
s
CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS
1. The Company shall have the right to, and will, at its own expense, defend the insured with respect to all demands and legal
proceedings founded upon a claim of title, encumbrance or defect which existed or is claimed to have existed prior to the date
hereof and is not set forth or excepted herein; reserving, however, the option at any time of settling the claim or paying the
amount of this policy in full. In case any such demand shall be asserted or any such legal proceedings shall be instituted the in-
sured shall at once give notice thereof in writing to the Company at its state office, Park Place, Sixth Avenue at University Street,
Seattle,Washington 98101 and,if the insured is a party to such legal proceedings,secure to the Company,within ten days after service
of first process upon the insured,the right to defend such legal proceedings in the name of the insured so far as necessary to protect
the insured, and the insured shall render all reasonable assistance in such defense. If such notice shall not be given, or the right to
defend secured,as above provided,then all liability of the Company with regard to the subject matter of such demand or legal pro-
ceedings,and any expense incident thereto,shall terminate; provided,however,that failure to give such notice shall in no case prejudice
the claim of the insured unless the Company shall be actually prejudiced by such failure and then only to the extent of such prejudice.
2. In the event of final judicial determination by a court of competent jurisdiction, under which the estate, lien or interest in-
sured is defeated or impaired by reason of any adverse interest,lien or encumbrance not set forth or excepted herein, claim may
be made as herein provided. A statement in writing of any loss or damage, for which it is claimed the Company is liable, shall
be furnished to the Company at its state office within sixty days after such loss or damage shall have been ascertained. No
right of action shall accrue with respect thereto until thirty days after such statement shall have been furnished and no recovery
shall be had unless an action shall have been commenced thereon within one year after the expiration of said thirty days. Any
rights or defenses of the Company against a named insured shall be equally available against any person or corporation who shall
become an insured hereunder as successor of such named insured.
3. The Company may at any time pay this policy in full, whereupon all liability of the Company shall terminate. Every pay-
ment made by the Company, exclusive of costs incurred by the Company as an incident to defense or settlement of claims
hereunder. shall reduce the liability of the Company by the amount paid. The liability of the Company shall in no case exceed
the actual loss of the insured and costs which the Company'is obligated to'pay. When the Company shall have paid a claim here-
under it shall be subrogated to all rights and remedies which the insured may have against any person or property,with respect
to such claim, or would have if this policy had not been issued, and the insured shall transfer all such rights to the Company.
If the payment made by the Company does not cover the loss of the'insured, such subrogation shall be proportionate. Whenever
the Company shall be obligated to pay a claim under the terms of this policy by reason of a defect in the title to a portion of
the area described herein, liability shall be limited to the proportion of the face amount of this policy which the'value of the
defective portion bears to the value of the whole at the time of the discovery of the defect, unless liability is otherwise specifi-
cally segregated herein. If this policy insures the lien of a mortgage, and claim is made hereunder, the Company may pay the
entire indebtedness and thereupon the insured shall assign to the Company the,mortgage and the indebtedness secured thereby,
with all instruments evidencing or securing the same, and shall convey to the Company any property acquired in full or partial
satisfaction of the indebtedness, and all liability of the Company shall thereupon terminate. If a policy insuring the lien of a
mortgage is issued simultaneously with this policy and for simultaneous issue premium as provided in rate schedule, any payment
by the Company on said'mortgage policy with respect to the real estate described' in Schedule A hereof shall reduce pro tanto
the liability under.this policy. All actions or proceedings against the Company must be based on the provisions, of this policy.
Any other action or actions or rights of action that the insured may have or may bring against the Company with respect to serv-
ices rendered in connection with the issuance of this policy, are merged herein and shall be enforceable only under the terms, condi-
tions and limitations of this policy.
4. The following terms when used in this policy mean: (a) "named insured": the persons and corporations named as insured
in Schedule A of this policy; (b) "the insured": such named insured together with (1) each successor in ownership of any in-
debtedness secured by any mortgage shown in Item 3 of Schedule A, (2) any owner or successor in ownership of any such indebt-
edness'who acquires title to the real estate described in Item 4 of Schedule A,or any part thereof,by lawful means in satisfaction
of said indebtedness or any part thereof, (3) any governmental agency or instrumentality which insures or guarantees said
indebtedness or any part thereof, and (4) any person or corporation deriving an estate or interest in said real estate as an heir
or devisee of a named insured or by reason of the dissolution, merger, or consolidation of a corporate named insured; (c) "date
hereof": the exact day, hour and minute specified in Schedule A; (d) "public records": records which, under the recording laws,
impart constructive notice with respect to said real estate; (e) "state office": the office of the Company at the address shown
herein; (f) "mortgage": mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument described in Schedule A.
0
ALASKA AND WLTA POLICY Form No.W&AK 4000-1 (1PT)
SCHEDULE A
No. 444670 Amount 21 , 000. 00
Date April 19 , 1977 at 8 : 30 A. If. Premium $ 128. 25
1. Insured
DOUGLAS A. WESTON and CAROL A. WESTON, husband and wife
2. Title to the estate, lien or interest insured by this policy is vested in
LAZZARO C. TONDA, as his separate estate
3. Estate, lien or interest insured
Fee simple estate .
4. Description of the real estate with respect to which this policy is issued
The North 38 . 50 feet of Tract 26 AND the South 67 . 50 feet of Tract 27 o
Plat No. 1 of Renton Co-operative Coal Company' s Acre Tracts according
to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 9 of Plats , on Page 29 , records
of King County, Washington;
EXCEPT that portion thereof lying Westerly of the Easterly line of
City of Seattle Cedar River Pipe Line right of way;
Situate in the County of King, State of Washington.
df
IP' IMF
WLTA WASHINGTON POLICY Form No.1.X'4000-2 (IPT)
SCHEDULE B •
Defects, liens, encumbrances and other matters against which the company does not insure:
Special exceptions
1. EASEMENT, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
Grantee: City of Renton;
Purpose: Sewer pipe line;
Area Affected: Southwesterly 8 feet of property
herein described.
2. Reservations contained in deed recorded under Recording No. 191520,
as follows:
Reserving and excepting therefrom to the Grantors and its assigns
all coal, clay, stone, oil and all minerals and mineral products
and mine same.
•
3 . CONTRACT OF SALE, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
Seller Lazzaro C . Tonda, as his separate estate
Purchaser Douglas A. Weston and Carol A. Weston, husband
and wife
Dated April 12, 1977
Recorded : April 19, 1977
Recording No . 7704190259 E# 02851
GENERAL EXCEPTIONS
•
1. Encroachments or questions of location, boundary and area, which an accurate survey may disclose; public or private
easements, streets, roads, alleys or highways, unless disclosed of record by recorded Plat or conveyance, or decree of a
Court of record; rights or claims of persons in possession, or claiming to be in possession, not disclosed by, the public
records; material or labor liens or liens under the Workmen's Compensation Act not disclosed by the public records;
water rights or matters relating thereto; any service, installation or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity, or
garbage removal.
2. Exceptions and reservations in United States Patents: right of use, control or regulation by the United States of America
in the exercise of powers over navigation; limitation by law or governmental regulation with respect to subdivision, use
enjoyment or occupancy; any prohibition or limitation on the use, occupancy or improvement•of the land resulting from
the rights of the public or riparian owners to use any waters which may cover the land; defects, liens, encumbrances, or
other matters created or suffered by the insured; rights or claims based upon instruments or upon facts not disclosed
by the public records but of which rights, claims, instruments or facts the insured has knowledge.
3. General taxes not now payable; matters relating to special assessments and special levies, if any, preceding the same be-
coming a lien.
4. "Consumer credit protection," "truth-in-lending," or similar law, or the failure to comply with said law or laws.
(End of Schedule B)
OWNER' ELATION PROTECTION INDORSE
• Attached to Policy No.
, Issued By
•
Transamerica Title Insurance Company
The Company, recognizing the current effect of inflation on real property valuation and intending to provide
additional monetary protection to the Insured Owner named in the Policy to which this Indorsement is attached,
hereby modifies said Policy, as follows:
1. Notwithstanding anything contained in said Policy to the contrary, the amount of insurance provided by
said Policy, as stated in Schedule A thereof, is subject to cumulative annual upward adjustments in the
manner and to the extent hereinafter specified.
2. "Adjustment Date" is defined, for the purpose of this Indorsement, to be 12:01 a.m. on the first January
1 which occurs more than six months after the Date of Policy, as shown in Schedule A of the Policy to
which this Indorsement is attached, and on each succeeding January 1.
3. An upward adjustment will be made on each of the Adjustment Dates, as defined above, by increasing the
maximum amount of insurance provided by said Policy (as said amount may have been increased theretofore
under the terms of this Indorsement) by the same percentage, if any, by which the United States Depart-
ment of Commerce Composite Construction Cost Index (base period 1967) for the month of September immedi-
ately preceding exceeds such Index for the month of September one year earlier; provided, however, that •
the maximum amount of insurance in force shall never exceed 150% of the amount of insurance stated in
Schedule A of said Policy, less the amount of any claim paid under said Policy which, under the terms
of the Conditions and Stipulations, reduces the amount of insurance in force. There shall be no annual
adjustment in the amount of insurance for years in which there is no increase in said Contruction Cost
Index.
4. In the settlement of any claim against the Company under said Policy, the amount of insurance in force
shall be deemed to be the amount which is in force as of the date on which the insured claimant first
learned of the assertion or possible assertion of such claim, or as of the date of receipt by the Com-
pany of the first notice of such claim, whichever shall first occur.
PROVIDED, HOWEVER, this indorsement shall be affective only if one of the following conditions exists at •
Date of Policy:
a. The land described in this Policy is a parcel on which there is only a one-to-four family residential
structure, including all improvements on the land related to residential use, in which the Insured Owner
resides or intends to reside; or
b. The land consists of a residential condominium unit, together with the common elements appurtenant
thereto and related to residential use thereof, in which the Insured Owner resides or intends to reside.
Nothing herein contained shall be construed as extending or changing the effective date of said Policy.
This Indorsement is made a part of said policy and is subject to the schedules, conditions and stipulations
therein, except as modified by the provisions hereof.
Transamerica Title Insurance Company
t:
By
by `t ���•" , Y�
Y President
®,/
• r ufi
•.i. 4C ' •
'4:1A11:‘,\41:Vijh f
NOTE: In connection with any renewal policy subsequently issued on said land, the renewal rate (if applicable at
all) will be allowed based only upon the original face amount of insurance as stated in Schedule A of said Policy.
/A Indorsement Form No. W&AK T/A-1
Effective 11-4-74 Washington)
Effective 4-17-75 Alaska) •
•
HOMEOWN .. S ADDITIONAL PROTECTION INDDSEMENT
Attached to Policy No.
Issued By
Transamerica Title Insurance Company
This Indorsement shall be effective only if at Date of policy there is located on the land described in said
Policy one-to-four family residential structure, in which the Insured Owner resides or intends to reside. For
the purpose of this Indorsement the term "residential structure" is defined as including the principal dwell-
ing structure located on said land and all improvements thereon related to residential use of the property,
except plantings of any nature and except perimeter fences and perimeter walls.
The Company hereby insures the Insured Owner of the estate or interest described.in Schedule A against loss
which the Insured Owner shall sustain by reason of:
a. the existence at Date of Policy of any of the following matters:
(1) lack of a right of access from said land to a public street;
(2) any taxes or assessments (excluding utility connection and service charges) levied by a public
authority against the estate or interest insured which constitute liens thereon and are not
shown 'as exceptions in Schedule B of said Policy;
(3) any unrecorded statutory liens for labor or material attaching to said estate or interest arising
out of any work of improvement on said land in progress or completed at Date of Policy, except a
work of improvement for which said Insured Owner has agreed to be responsible;
b. the enforced removal of said residential structure or interference with the use thereof for ordinary
residential purposes based upon the existence at Date of Policy of:
(1) any encroachment of said residential structure or any part thereof onto adjoining lands, or onto
any easement shown as an exception in Schedule B of said Policy, or onto any unrecorded subsurface
easement;
•
(2) any violation of any enforceable covenants, conditions or restrictions affecting said land and
shown in Schedule B;
(3) any violation of applicable zoning ordinances, but this Indorsement does not insure compliance
with, nor is it in any way concerned with, building codes or other exercise of governmental police
power;
•
c. damage to said residential structure resulting from the exercise of any right to use the surface
of said land for the extraction or development Of minerals, if minerals are excepted.from the
description of said land or shown as an exception or reservation in Schedule B.
The total liability of the Company under said Policy and all indorsements attached thereto shall not exceed,
in•the aggregate, the amount of said Policy and costs which the Company.is obligated under the conditions and
stipulations thereof to pay; and nothing contained herein shall be construed as extending or changing the
effective date of said'Policy.
•
This indorsement is made a part of said Policy and is subject to'the schedules, conditions and stipulations
therein, except as modified by the provisions hereof. •
•
•
•
• Transamerica Title Insurance Company •
•
1/ President
s,"`z. m4 Y 2 3 q\()
•
T/A Indorsement Form No, W T/A-2 4ik �li j O k�`�'4s
(Effective 5-15-76) • � WM��
•
I fim No. W-AK-555.1 0
��� CI .
Previnup Fnrrp No..80 SP) !` .7
C awn by Cbecked Date Plat VoL9_____PG; Order No.
SKETCH OF PROPERTY SE. OUT IN ATTACHED ORDER
To assist in locating the premises. It i not based on a survey, and the company
assumes no liability for variations if any, in dimensions and location.
•
9c0
i6.. \t_..
O ALL[ '.OzI.N..,,,,i.' -2O -/9 .
1
•
I ---'
1 fN lfl
1" , !� .
I
q i
O� I' �// �\\� - -- 1 — —j
4/I / 2 p ' iR L yr\ �L
\y"�
•
Note—This map does not purport to show all highways, roads or easements affecting the property.
_.
0
•
Affidavit of Publication iday, January 20, 1978
Public Notices
JANUARY 31, 1978, AT
STATE OF WASHINGTON 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER
COUNTY OF KING ss THE FOLLOWING PET;
TIONS:
1.RALPH HYATT, .AP-
• PLICATION FOR
Margaret Harbau h TWO-LOT SHORT
being first duly sworn on PLAT APPROVAL,
File No. 119-78;prop-
oath,deposes and says that she is the Chief ClClerk of arty located on Cedar
Avenue South,approx-
THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four(4) imately 150 feet south
times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and • of South 7th Street.
has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred t 2. J AND F INVEST-
to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- I. . NI ENT COMPANY,
. paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, ••PLICATION FOR
and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained LONE FROM G
at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Renton : SR-1, File No.
Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the 5-:-117-78; property
Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County,
_'._" located at Union Av-
. Washington.That the annexed is a -Notice of Public I -r .'Second Place. .S.E.
,r3.'DOUGLAS A. WES-
TON, APPLICATION
IleAX:}'ng FOR TWO-LOT
SHORT PLAT AP-
! .. PROVAL AND AP-
as it was published in regular issues(and ': PLICATION FOR EX-
not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period • CEPTION TO SUB
DIVISION ORDI-
i - NANCE REGARD-
of 1 •
consecutive issues,commencing on the I N G. P I P E S T E M
LOTS, File No. 120-
78 and File No. E-
20 day of January ,19 77 ,and ending the 121e7d; ®vicinity,in ppeylo-
-. 424 Renton Avenue
South.
day of ,19 both dates . Legal.descriptions of all
inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- . . applicator's noted above
scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee •• on file in -the Renton
.Planning Department.
ALL INTERESTED PER-
charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $31 6g which • - NOTICE OF SONS TO SAID PETITIONS
has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the PUBLIC HEARING ARE'INVITED TO BE PRE-
first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent _ RENTON LAND USE • SENT AT THE PUBLIC
insertion. 'HEARING EXAMINER HEARING ON JANUARY
•RENTON,WASHINGTON 31, 1978 AT 9:00 A.M.TO
...... ,,,.. ""'..c."""'`�"S" WILL BE HELD BYA PUBLIC RTHE N ONSING ESS THEIR OPI
RENTON LAND USE • GORDON Y.ERICKSON
Chief clerk HEARING EXAMINER AT RENTON PLANNING
HIS REGULAR MEETING DIRECTOR
IN THE COUNCIL CHAM-. Published in The Renton
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 20 day of .BERS; CITY HALL, 'RE- :Record-Chronicle January
.... -- .. NTON;.WASHINGTON;'ON.,-20, 1978.R4762
January 1978 ig /(-0F ii.-4 ,\,
Notary Public d for the State of Washi ton, (I'
residing at Kent, King Co66unty. JAN 25—Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June
9th, 1955. ---....,r— �.
92
—Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, l(.,
adopted by the newspapers of the State. 2/
NG DEP PRE
V.P.C.Form No.87
/r/
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
F
RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
RENTON, WASHINGTON
A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON ,
WASHINGTON , ON JANUARY 31 , 19 78 , AT 9 : 00 A. M . TO CONSIDER
THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS :
1 . RALPH HYATT , APPLICATION FOR TWO-LOT SHORT
PLAT APPROVAL , File No . 119-78 ; property
located on Cedar Avenue South , approximately
150 feet south of South 7th Street .
2 . J AND F INVESTMENT COMPANY , APPLICATION FOR
REZONE FROM G TO SR- 1 , File No . R- 117- 78;
property located at Union Avenue S . E . and
S . E . Second Place .
3 . DOUGLAS A. WESTON , APPLICATION FOR TWO-LOT
SHORT PLAT APPROVAL AND APPLICATION FOR
EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REGARDING
PIPESTEM LOTS , File No . 120- 78 and File No .
E- 121- 78 ; property located in the vicinity
of 424 Renton Avenue South .
Legal descriptions of all applications noted
above on file in the Renton Planning Department.
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT
THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JANUARY 31 , 1978 AT 9 : 00 A . M . TO
EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS .
GORDON Y . ERICKSEN
PUBLISHED January 20, 1978 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR
CERTIFICATION
MICHAEL L. SMITH , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES
OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES
ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW .
ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn )
to before me , a Notary Public , �J' �
on the 18th day of January /" /,
1978 SIGNED/����_ � ; �c1�
r\:\ n \1A'1 /
//r lit
ROUTE SCHEDULE 1111
PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE ROUTED ) 20/7,P.
PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR:
REZONE MAJOR PLAT
SITE APPROVAL SHORT PLAT
SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER
SHORELINE MANAGEMENT
PERMIT OR EXEMPTION ppotTLAs wr s LXG. ri67,J -bet-
AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE / Z1/7
SIGNATURE
OR
INITA DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DENIAL DATE
BUIL1 ):11
TRAFFIC E . )C i-Z1-76°
ENGINEERIN >C • / L817�
FIRE ✓ l?,s'�?ef- A'
HEALTH
- /- L3-76
REVIEWER ' S S/COMMENTS OR APPROVAL CONDITIONS :
-
% l�..* de S i'roe 'h . _ /G -/74L r so 44-7-r'G'•,..
s A-0.,.ld
* spa 47McW1p M divio
..�
PLEASE SIGN THE E . I .W . :
11
1111
ROUTE SCHEDULE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE ROUTED 7Z49/7,5f
PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR:
REZONE MAJOR PLAT
SITE APPROVAL n c S Loir -; j HORT PLAT /L0 -7?
SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER
SHORELINE MANAGEMENT
PERMIT OR EXEMPTION
AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE /Z"/-y�
SIGNATURE ,
OR
INITALf DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DENIAL DATE
11. i- )-0-7 B
TRAFFIC ENG' X /-�4-7P
T 4 4, G NEERING / i/L3M---
�L�i FIRE ,. ,4r-Ap A-
/ HEALTH
C.- --- x I - z3-7a-
REVIEWER ' S COMMENTS OR APPROVAL CONDITIONS :
1 j AfACAWD ME b
Sek. /i.vo& _4) Zrz7e7, QufGe:.ic/c / i9f7erp cd• S74-de ' JiAvu
i31 /9CeZzssl,[3ie 7�.=ir= .9err ie7,- /i,P4 e,Tu t ,3Y 4/+1' of,st'ct.S
jt®fn /S �.i?N /lie-4ie.A ism vg.vr.t,c ,rw2r-4ce- of Ad; T.✓c
.2o 'J27- 1 z, .isA, 7 *iC7Z7 Lt.•71 4OF434..9€ ,2o4'7441Y Tee4r ./e
ee4d.u3 e/fr°d/Sd of sLeepo,e;.,,rc fie r,Pa t '- Lo,1 1 d /cieCL
�P,ileerr7k AA.0 //4viriC /A /'l hid Jr,uA-t !3 ,`~ of ptir7;c4c
i
G�/.G e�AA/Ct.,- wnRe yvvia2mvT eluel'G`2 e,,Tli-, , 2.So ,/'-ei7" of ft'-S' .
S�/PK C.i u2G .
PLEASE SIGN THE E . I .W . :
1
TO : 'At 'c " ' m 7 ?
FicOM : PAW c.. L .ti.a6.4 7 - d_
ACE: syo.cr Ptr9T `izo-78
I I gecoM M FivI 7w4 r 7#F . Fir/JTi�6 /o'
ALC.E y JAII/CATEp 0A/ Me P4/4•v
a V qc ATE0 AN d PR/vATr E 4sefti Fes'
'rto
/A, aV,O W 001 /�v L &
oKED /A/ TV AS 4 Ass i A
t, ci 770N N . T/4I4 N E:4s ELj 6 ,g.v'r si/oc.0
PAvLd wTM AsPN4 .rt J �
� /jZ
t ?J/s c114 ETT /60' 4.064v6 ®
AN E4reit-1 EAv7-' cov/Tl1 7$/6" CAI 'tit.EitoS/QAvS
♦AV 1 is-TErD Oleo vE: cA.o v Lia /silo vIi,
/4 Goo° Acc Ecc To AGC. 7fE
ABu1Thv G prtoPEA-ry owiv Ei2 S
P,1jL Lv.%s ,( —
- _. Ail d10-11 f fCe57 �.Gcw�./ �✓�C G�-s���....�--..._ _ -
_ .
' •
•
CITY OF RENTON NO 272i
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS /6 -- -
PERMIT NO. RENTON, WA.
RECE I VED OF
xz„,
DOLLARS
• -
(2-'2" -C •
• PLANS DEPOSIT.
•-
• MAPS
, • •
P ej/ POSTAGE
P.7 MI SCELLANEOUS C
V
TAX
TOTAL •
BY 0- 0)(,,
•
•
• ,
•
4 O F R��
v ``., _.... o THE CITY OF RENTON
, MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
8
pp CHARLES J. DELAURENTI • MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
'O Q- L. RICK BEELER , 235-2593
O,P'WO SEPI "
March 1, 1978
Mr. Douglas A. Weston
21318 109th Avenue S.E.
Kent, WA 98031
RE: Short Plat #120-78, E-121-78.
Dear Mr. Weston:
This is to notify you that the above referenced requests, which were
approved subject to conditions as noted on the Examiner's report of
February 14, 1978, have,not been appealed within the time period set
by ordinance, and therefore, this application is considered final
and is being submitted to the City Clerk effective this date for
permanent filing.
Please contact the Planning Department for information regarding
preparation of the final short plat mylar for filing with King County.
Sinc-
L. Rick Beeler
Hearing Examiner
cc: Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director
Del Mead, City Clerk
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
State of Washington)
County of King
Marilyn J. Petersen , being first duly sworn, upon
oath disposes and states:
That on the 14th day of February , 19 78 , of f iant
deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope
containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid,
addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled
application or petition.
U �
Subscribed and sworn this \` day of \ e\l'iCv?C'
19 1 g .
\ ath,i(_ \ LC4,( '
Notary Public in and for the ,State
of Washington, residing at Rehtoi
Application, Petition or Case: Douglas A. Weston, Short Plat 120-78, E-121-78
(The minutes contain a ti.b-t oti the panties og necond)
February 14, 1978
OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
CITY OF RENTON
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION .
APPLICANT: Douglas A. Weston FILE NO. Short Plat 120-78
E-121-78
LOCATION: 424 Renton Avenue South
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant requests the approval of a proposed two (2)
lot short plat, and an exception to the Subdivision Ordinance
to allow a ten (10) foot pipestem together with ten (10)
foot, public alley to provide access to a proiooseol back lot.
The applicant also proposes to pave the ten (10) foot alley.
SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions.
Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval with conditions.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department staff report was received by the
REPORT: Examiner on January 24, 1978.
PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining
available information on file with the application, and
field checking the property and surrounding area, the
Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as
follows:
The hearing was opened on January 31, 1978 at 9:42 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the
Renton Municipal Building.
Parties wishing to testify were sworn.
It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed
the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1.
Michael Smith, Planning Department,• reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following •
additional exhibits into the record:
Exhibit #2: King County Assessor's Map
Exhibit #3: Short Plat Map with staff comments
Exhibit #4: Short Plat Map as submitted
Exhibit #5: Letter from Mr. Weston, dated
January 13, 1978.
Mr. Smith referred to Section 0.2 and 0.4 of Exhibit #1 regarding recommended lot sizes
and noted that although both lots exceed minimum square footage requirements, lot lines
between Lots A and B should be shifted eastward to correspond with the subdivisions and
structures to the north and create a more balanced lot configuration of 150 feet in
depth and preclude the possibility of further subdivision of Lot B. Regarding the
subject of pipestem access denoted in Section 0.6, Mr. Smith referred to a recommendation
for additional paving to provide suitable fire vehicle access. The Examiner asked for
testimony from the Fire Department representative. Responding was:
Ed Wooton
Renton Fire Department
Mr. Wooton reported departmental requirements for a 16-foot paved width of easement on
either the south or north boundary alternative recommended in the Planning Department
report.
The Examiner called for a recess at 10:00 a.m. The meeting was reconvened at 10:15 a.m.
The Examiner asked the applicant if he concurred in Exhibit #1. Responding was:
Douglas Weston
21318 109th Avenue S.E.
Kent, WA 98031
Sh. P1. 120-78 Page Two
E-121-78
Mr. Weston reported that he did not concur in the report completely, and indicated that
as a result of discussions with an adjacent neighbor to the north of the site he wished
to offer alternative suggestions for the access proposal, including paving a 10-foot
strip on the northern boundary designated for landscaping and utilizing it as a private
driveway to the rear lot or revising the access to the south boundary of the property to
provide a 20-foot access. He also stated a preference for providing only 10 feet of
paving for either alternative per current ordinance requirements, and noted that a rock
retaining wall could be constructed on the northern boundary to provide screening. He
objected to the recommendation for revising lot depths to 150 feet and indicated that
although he would be willing to revise the lot depth configurations to 135 feet for
Lot A and 165 feet for Lot B he preferred retaining Lot B in a larger configuration. He
also indicated willingness to provide landscaping and screening within reason for either
access alternative and noted the existence of a fire hydrant on Renton Avenue South
which may interfere with proposed access paving.
The Examiner asked for testimony in favor of the application. There was no response.
The Examiner asked for testimony in opposition to the request. Responding was:
Claude Rogers
420 Renton Avenue South
Renton, WA 98055
Mr. Rogers reported being the owner of the property just north of the subject site. He
advised that the 10-foot easement on the north side of the proposal had originally been
dedicated to the city but had been maintained by himself for the past 18 years. He
noted that the land consists of sand and gravel covered by approximately one foot of
soil, and suggested that retaining walls be utilized to prevent erosion. He also advised
that because current heavy traffic created safety hazards and noise, he favored expansion
of the easement and creation of a public street.
The Examiner asked for further testimony in opposition to the request. There was no
response. The Examiner asked Mr. Wooton to respond to previous testimony regarding
easement width. Mr. Wooton indicated that because of the width of fire equipment and
the possibility that the easement may be blocked by parked cars, a 15-foot paved width
was necessary. Mr. Weston advised that if a driveway were installed on the south
property line leading to a single lot, 10 feet of paving met ordinance requirements. Mr.
Wooton responded that the proposal for paving was acceptable to the department if proper
width in the total easement was provided for fire vehicle access. In response to the
Examiner's inquiry regarding minimum pipestem width beyond 10 feet, Mr. Wooton indicated
a requirement of 12 feet in width. Mr. Weston stated that if the alternative on the
south side of the property were approved, he preferred a 20-foot easement narrowing to
10 feet at Renton Avenue South adjacent to the Cedar River Pipeline right-of-way. Mr.
Smith preferred a recommendation for a 15-foot easement along Renton Avenue South which
would still allow for a 50-foot lot frontage at that location. The Examiner asked Mr.
Wooton for his final recommendation on the proposed easement width and location. Mr.
Wooton advised that the Fire Department would have no objection to allowing a 5-foot
setback on the proposed 20-foot easement which would provide 15 feet of maneuvering
space for fire vehicles.
In response to the Examiner's inquiry regarding the possibility of gaining vehicular
access to connect perpendicularly to Renton Avenue South, Mr. Smith advised that the
City of Seattle is not amenable to granting an easement across the Cedar River Pipeline
right-of-way, and the proposal would create an easement onto a public street rather
than direct frontage onto a public street. Mr. Weston advised that he had contacted
the City of Seattle regarding access rights across the pipeline right-of-way and was
informed that without legal action it would not be possible. The Examiner expressed a
concern that because the right-of-way had been used for public access for a period
longer than seven years, rights of access exist for all public use.
The Examiner asked Mr. Smith if the access proposal on the south boundary of the property
had been discussed with the Traffic Engineering Division. Mr. Smith indicated that
although the proposal had not been reviewed in detail, the division had been instrumental
in developing the ordinance relating to pipestem lots and the recommendation for a 20-foot
easement should meet with departmental approval. The Examiner questioned whether the
city would be amenable to vacating the existing dedicated 10-foot easement on the north
and indicated that he would research the matter along with the proposal for access on the
southerly side of the subject site with the Public Works Department prior to publishing
a recommendation on the request. He advised that all correspondence relating to these
inquiries would be incorporated into his report and transmitted to all parties of record,
and asked if parties in attendance at the hearing were amenable to this proposal. Mr.
Weston and Mr. Rogers indicated their concurrence in the Examiner's request.
Sh. P1. 120-78 Page Three
E-121-78
The Examiner asked Mr. Smith for final comments. Mr. Smith indicated that testimony
received from Mr. Rogers regarding creation of hardship for residents if access were
provided on the northern boundary of the site would revise the Planning Department •
recommendation for a 20-foot access on the southern boundary. He also recommended
that further research be accomplished to determine whether the paved access width
should be 15 feet as recommended by the Planning Department or 10 feet as preferred
by the applicant on the western portion of the site fronting on Renton Avenue South.
He noted that the remainder of the easement should be of 20-foot width with a minimum
5-foot screening and landscaping strip along the south property line.
The Examiner asked for further comments. Since there were none, the hearing on
Item #Short Plat 120-78 and E-121-78 was closed by the Examiner at 10:50 a.m.
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in-this matter,
the Examiner now makes and enters the following:
FINDINGS:
1. The request is for approval of a two-lot short plat.
2. The Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues, applicable policies
and provisions, findings of fact, and departmental recommendations in this matter,
and is hereby attached as Exhibit ##1 and incorporated in this report by reference
as set forth in full therein.
3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental
Policy Act of 1971, as amended by R.C.W. 43.21.C. , a Declaration of Non-Significance
has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official.
4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed. by all city departments affected by the
impact of this development. (After closure of the public hearing the attached
memorandum of February 10, 1978 was submitted upon request of the Examiner in the
attached memorandum of January 13, 1978.)
5. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity.
6. The proposal is compatible with the required setbacks, lot area, lot size and lot
dimension requirements of Section 4-706 (R-1) of Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code
of General Ordinances.
7. A ten-foot public alley exists along the northern portion of the property. Including
the proposed two lots, four dwelling units would utilize this alley. One of the
existing homes is apparently a legal nonconforming use of more than one family.
8. The homes at 420 and 4201 Renton Avenue South are located approximately 10 feet or
so from the 10-foot alley. The home on the subject site is 17 feet from the alley.
9. Proposed Lot B contains 19,080 square feet (Exhibit #4) which is sufficient area
for two lots.
10. At present the 10-foot alley is mostly unimproved, and what paving that exists is
inadequate for the traffic on the alley.
11. Dedication for public right-of-way along the northwesterly approximate 85 feet of
the property is limited to 12 feet (5-foot setback from the existing house) . The
total dedication would be 22 feet, including the alley, which does not meet the
minimum requirement of 50 feet per Sections 9-1108.7.H and K and 9-1108.23. (5) .
Along the remainder of the property a dedication is limited to 26 feet due to a
minimum lot depth of 80 feet per Section 9-1108.23.F. (b) , for a total of. 36 feet
of alley width.
12. The property owner immediately north of the existing residence on the subject site
complained about the traffic noise occurring on the alley.
13. A title insurance policy was submitted by the appliant in the application file.
(Section 9-1106.3.H. (6) ) .
14. Certification by a licensed land surveyor was not submitted per Section 9-1106.3.H. (3) .
15. Certification by the King County Health Department and the King County and City of
Renton Finance Departments is normally made during final approval or recording of
the short plat. (Section 9-1106.3.H. (4) , (7) , (8) ) .
Sh. P1. 120-78 Page Four
E-121-78
16. Improvements have not been deferred by the Board of Public Works per Section 9-1106.3.H.
(5) .
17. An Exception from the requirements of Section 9-1108.24.F. (d) (Pipestem Lots) was
requested.
18. Restrictive Covenants were not submitted (Section 9-1106.3.I.) .
19. In the attached memorandum of February 10, 1978 the Department of Public Works
recommended the southerly pipestem configuration and retention of the existing alley.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The proposal conforms to the Comprehensive Plan Goals and Objectives and Land Use Map.
2. Only two configurations of the proposed two-lot short plat are possible. Either
more property is dedicated for the alley to thereby increase its conformity or a
pipestem lot is created along the southerly property line.
3. Dedication of additional property for the alley will not remove the nonconformity
of the alley for dedication of a complete public street of the required width.
4. Sufficient property exists along the southerly property line to accommodate a conforming
pipestem except at the southwestern corner of the site. The intersection of a 20-
foot pipestem with Renton Avenue South creates an unusual width of the pipestem
(approximately 30 feet) due to the angle of Renton Avenue South. It seems
appropriate to require only the 20-foot pipestem width along Renton Avenue South.
Accordingly it is reasonable to taper the pipestem to Renton Avenue South because
of the unusual configuration of that street (Section 9-1109.1.A) and because the
public welfare or adjacent property will not be injured (Section 9-1109.1.C) . The
tapered pipestem will preserve the privilege of a normal, unobstructed front yard
that is typical for the area (Section 9-1109.1.B) . Undue hardship is not an issue
(Section 9-1109.1) , but the exception is a reasonable response to the specific
circumstances of this specific property.
An unidentified easement exists along the southwest property line abutting Renton
Avenue South which would also lie within the southerly pipestem. While it may be
assumed that this easement is for utilities, any decision to allow this pipestem
must be prefaced upon lack of interference with the decision by the easement.
5. Unless the northerly 10-foot alley is widened to accommodate the increased density
resulting from the proposal, the southerly pipestem access is the only access point
which would enhance the existing conditions in the alley. The application possesses
insufficient property to comply with the minimum 10-foot pipestem width adjacent
to the alley. The homes that are located adjacent to the alley are uncomfortably
close to the pavement that would be created. Normally, such a distance would be
witnessed in a pipestem configuration serving only one lot, not three or four as
is potential in this instance.
6. In accordance with Section 9-1105.7 the final short plat map can be approved by
the Planning Department for conformance with the Examiner's decision.
DECISION:
Based upon the record, testimony, findings and conclusions, it is the decision of the
Examiner to approve a two-lot short plat of the applicant's property subject to revision
of the short plat map, Exhibit #4, to reflect the southerly pipestem configuration
contained in Exhibit #3.
Furthermore, it is the decision of the Examiner to approve an exception to allow less
than the required pipestem width on the southwesterly portion of the site in order to
permit tapering the pipestem per Exhibit #3 to a 20-foot pipestem width on Renton Avenue
South.
The Planning and Fire'Departments shall approve the final short plat map per the above
decision.
ORDERED THIS 14th day of February, 1978. OPP
11411
Ri k Beefier
• Land Use Hearing Examiner
•
Sh. P1. 120-78 Page Five
E-121-78
TRANSMITTED THIS 14th day of February, 1978 by Affidavit of Mailing to the
parties of record:
Ed Wooton
Douglas Weston, 21318 109th Avenue S.E. , Kent, WA 98031
Claude Rogers, 420 Renton Ave. S. , Renton, WA 98055
TRANSMITTED THIS 14th day of February, 1978 to the following:
Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti
• Councilman George J. Perry
Councilman Richard M. Stredicke
Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director
Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director
Ron Nelson, Building Division
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 'of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must
be filed in writing on or before February 28, 1978. Any aggrieved person feeling that
the.decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact,
error 'in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably
available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner
within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request
shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner
may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper.
An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires
that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee 'of $25.00 and
meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for
inspection in the City Clerk's office, first floor of City Hall, or same may be
purchased at cost in said office.
•
MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 10, 1978
T0: Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner
•
FROM: Warren Gonnason, Public Works Director
•
SUBJECT: Short Plat No. 120-78; Exception No. 121-78
Douglas A. Weston
The Traffic Engineering Division has no objections to the alternate
short plat configuration that was presented by the Planning Department,
The proposed pipestem should be 20' min. width from Renton Ave. South
to the proposed site.
• The city does not have any plans for the alley in terms of vacation
or expansion because it is necessary to provide access to the
existing properties.
-727/2 /
PL•ad •
Attachment •
•
•
•
•
RECEIVEb •
CITY 'OF RENTON
HEARING EXAMINER
• FEB.1 0197R
AM
718Aig I&&LZL2I314,516
4 of R ,/
v �i o THE CITY OF RENTON
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
.13
�• CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
A Q� L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593
O4PED SEPO-
January 31, 1978
•
MEMORANDUM
•
TO: Del Bennett, Traffic Engineer
Public Works Department
FROM: L. Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner •
SUBJECT: Short Plat No. 120-78; Exception No. 121-78; Douglas A. Weston
At today's public hearing concerning this application, the following issues
arose to which your department had not had an opportunity to respond or .
comment. Rather than having a continuation of the hearing, all parties were
agreeable to submitting these questions to you for a written response.
1. The Planning 'Department presented an alternative short plat configuration
which located• the pipestem at the south property line. This pipestem
would continue along the south property line and parallel to the Seattle
• Cedar River Pipeline easement. At Renton Avenue South, the pipestem
would narrow from 20 feet to somewhere between 10 and 15 feet..
Is this alternative preferable to your department? If so, do you have
a recommendation as to the appropriate width of the pipestem at Renton
Avenue South?
2. Testimony was entered into the record that the 10-foot easement along
the northerly property line of the subject ,site is, in fact, dedicated to
the city. Two properties are served by that "alley."
Does the city have any plans for this alley in terms of vacation oY
expansion? •
•
My decision regarding this application is due on February 14, 1978. Therefore,
your written response will be needed by February 8, 1978, but sooner if possible.
Th.. '. y.
r
L. Ric Beeler •
.. ,
----- -/-7f- 7P
Ppnton Planrinr? Ferartmert
'hnic4_ral '1il -lir7
20r' "ill Avenue So.
Renton, -ashinton 0804;5
Pe: Short Plat-42/, Rentor Ave.ro.
Dear Sirs:
I Rm in the rrooPss of short nlattinv the above referenced
nronortv under the unirestem" provisions of the Renton Subdivision
Ordirp,nce. Due to the seventeen "oot distance from the existing
house on the front lot to the north prorPrtv line , I desire to
provide the t cot- feet of access outlined in the ordinance by pavinfi
the e-Kistinr? ter foot ruhl.ic alley to the, north of the nrooerty and
dredirr the ten "Pet Rdiacert to the north line to the rear lot for
landscaninr.
I renuest the annroval of this nirestem subdivision 74.th access
an -'escribed above for the fo1lowirc7, reasons:
Thr lots are quite 'are and have a r?rent view notertial •-Nhich
can only, be realized by pinestem dPvelonmert.
This method of dPvelonmert .:ill 'not be dntrimental to neiphboring
nrocerties, but rather 'ill nrovide navel access to the two houses
to the north.
The subdivision -ill nrovirle t, :o vie lots and a ne,7 house that
will be an imrrovement to the area.
:ith these thoughts in mind, .nlease sneed the annroval of the
requested short °lat.
Zinc rel.?,
15%
Dr ,-lls A. -eston
211" lUqth Ave. S.E. A:\. g.NE.b 9„.A.
' Prt, eshirri-ton (0,011 ()
JAN 1 3 1918
- e 4.,
/NG D523.1
\
CITY OF RENTON (5/,v /°/4.
--L—_SHORT PLAT _P ION FILE NO.
MAJOR PLAT / 0 atA)
V DATE REC'D.
TENTATIVE APPLICATION FEE $ /�/.gli�- PRELIMINARY ram: ENVIRONMENTAL
- FINAL a:J jAN 13 1918 REVIEW FEE $ r/
s7 RECEIPT NO. eaJ
A .ecs ------- � SM NO.
\, PUD NO.
APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 T R
1. Plat Name & Location L21, Renton Avenue South
2. No. Lots 2 Total Acreage anrox. 3/4 Zoning R 1
3.. Owner nnv,lns A_ RR Carol A. ''.'oston Phone 854_2130
Address 21318 109th Ave. S.E,. Kent, Washington
5. Underground Utilities: Yes No Not Installed
Telephone ( ) ( x ) ( )
Electric ( x ) ( ) ( )
Street Lights ( x ) ( ) ( )
Natural Gas ( x ) ( ) ( )
TV Cable ( ) ( ) ( )
6. Sanitation & Water:
( x ) City Water ( x ) Sanitary Sewers
( ) Water District No. ( ) Dry Sewers
( ) Septic Tanks
7. Vicinity and plat maps as required by Subdivision Ordinance.
8. DATE REFERRED TO:
ENGINEERING PARKS
BUILDING HEALTH
TRAFFIC ENG. STATE HIGHWAY
FIRE COUNTY PLANNING
BD. PUBLIC WORKS OTHER
9. STAFF ACTION:
TENTATIVE PLAT APPROVED DENIED
APPEALED EXPIRED
10. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER'S ACTION:
SHORT PLAT APPROVED DENIED
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED
FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED
11. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED
FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED
12. DEFERRED IMPROVEMENTS:
DATE DATE BOND NO. AND
TYPE GRANTED EXPIRES AMOUNT
Planning Dept.
Roy. 1/77
• AFFIDAVIT
I,_ ,o���--pp/� ZaS 7z, , being duly sworn, declare that I
am the ocher of the property involved in this application and that the
foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information
herewith submitted are in all respects. true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief.
Subscribed and sworn before me
this day of , 197f
Notary Public in and for the State of
•
Washington, ' residing
2?/'?' (//-'
(Name or Notary P lic) (Si ature of Owner)
c C;,/ . Cu 7 7 z--��J � ( .- /5/01) /09/1 ,,,e
(Address) f
(Address)
(City) (State)
•
(Telephone)
(FOR OFFICE USE ONLY)
CERTIFICATION
•
This is to certify t he foregoing application has been inspected by me
and has been foun39% by ough and complete in every particular and to
conform to the re eV ations of the Renton Planning Department
governing the t� '1uno bc plication.
Date Received JAN 13 1978 19 By:
-15
N Dek�
Renton Planning Dept .
2-73
•
•
•
•
Affidavit of Publication iday, January 20, 1978
Public Notices •
JANUARY 31, 1978, AT
STATE OF WASHINGTON 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER
COUNTY OF KING ss' THE FOLLOWING PETI-
TIONS:
I. 1.RALPH HYATT, .AP- ,-
' PLICATION FOR
Margaret Harbau h ' TWO-LOT SHORT
being first duly sworn on PLAT APPROVAL,
. File No. 119-78;prop- •
oath,deposes and says that s he is the Chief Clerk of erty located on Cedar
-•Avenue South,approx •
-
THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four(4) -•imately 150 feet south
times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and • of South 7th Street.
has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred •f 2. J AND F-INVEST-
to,printed and published in the English language continually as a news- 1 ••MENT. COMPANY;
paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, ;PLICATION FOR
and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained "•,�:ZONE•FROM .G
at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Renton SR-1, Ale No.
•
Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the -117-78; property
Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, t.;.::located at Union Av-
•
jF•«- r;enue S.E. and S.E.
Washington.That the annexed is a NO t i C e of Public . • Second Place.
de 3.'DOUGLAS A. WES-
-TON, APPLICATION
•••Rear •ng FOR TWO-LOT
"SHORT PLAT AP-
F`.' ;. PROVAL AND AP-
as it was published in regular issues(and '"'PLICATION FOR EX-
not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period ,••CEPTION TO SUB-
'-DIVISION ORDI-
,.NANCE 'REGARD-
of consecutive issues,commencing on the 1 N G. P I P E S T.E M
LOTS, File No. 120-
78 and File No. E-
20 day of January ,19 77 ,and ending the '.,cated in the propertyvicinity l of
424-:Renton Avenue
South.
day of ,19 ,both dates :-Legal,descriptions of all-
inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- '• applicatons noted above
scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee on file in-the Renton
-Planning Department.
ALL INTERESTED PER-
charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $31.• DO which • NOTICE OF SONS TO SAID PETITIONS
has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the PUBLIC HEARING ARE'INVITED TO BE PRE-
first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent RENTON LAND USE '. SENT AT THE PUBLIC
insertion. • t'.EARING EXAMINER HEARING ON JANUARY
•RENTON,WASHINGTON 31, 1978 AT 9:00 A.M.TO
i�1.G.A..�- j A PUBLIC-HEARING.;-EXPRESS_THEIR.API- .,
r "' WILL•BE HELD-BY THE NIONS.
RENTON LAND=;USE • GORDON Y.ERICKSON
Chief C1ex.k HEARING EXAMINER AT. RENTON PLANNING
HIS REGULAR MEETING. - DIRECTOR
IN THE COUNCIL.CHAM-• ' Published.in The Renton
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 20 day of .BERS, CITY HALL, RE =Record-Chronicle January
•NTON,..WASHINGTON;ON 20,.1978.R4762•..._
January , 19 7$
/4 of RF ..
Notary Public d for the State of Washington, V(Eb \
•
JAN 25 19-8
—Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June K• 1
9th, 1955. r. --.--..,y - A.
92 Z—Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, �V l
adopted by the newspapers of the State. �/
NG DEP PRE
•
V.P.C.Form No.87
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
RENTON, WASHINGTON
A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON ,
WASHINGTON , ON JANUARY 31 , 19 78 , AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO CONSIDER
THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS :
1 . RALPH HYATT, APPLICATION FOR TWO-LOT SHORT
PLAT APPROVAL , File No . 119-78 ; property
located on Cedar Avenue South , approximately
150 feet south of South 7th Street .
2 . J AND F INVESTMENT COMPANY , APPLICATION FOR
REZONE FROM G TO SR- 1 , File No . R- 117- 78;
property located at Union Avenue S . E . and
S . E . Second Place.
3 . DOUGLAS A. WESTON , APPLICATION FOR TWO-LOT
SHORT PLAT APPROVAL AND APPLICATION FOR
EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REGARDING
PIPESTEM LOTS , File No . 120- 78 and File No .
E- 121- 78 ; property located in the vicinity
of 424 Renton Avenue South .
Legal descriptions of all applications noted
above on file in the Renton Planning Department .
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT
THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JANUARY 31 , 1978 AT 9 : 00 A . M. TO
EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS .
GORDON Y . ERICKSEN
PUBLISHED January 20, 1978 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR
CERTIFICATION
MICHAEL L . SMITH , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES
OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES
ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW .
ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn
to before me , a Notary Public , ) /'
on the 18th day of January f
1978 SIGNED4/ ‹ ��.
ROUTE SCHEDULE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE ROUTED #11,R
PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR:
REZONE MAJOR PLAT
SITE APPROVAL SHORT PLAT
SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER
SHORELINE MANAGEMENT I
PERMIT OR EXEMPTION X� v,J . C"_iz1-77
AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE �/7" `
SIGNATURE
OR
INITA DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DENIAL DATE
/J 7
---77/-t-
BUILDI p4- -2�)�'
TRAFFIC E X i-zI-•7B
.„ .
ENGINEERIN X /izeh.
ow k (FIRE ✓ /A1'/Ti f-
HEALTH
L ?—, /- L 3-76
REVIEWER ' S
�COMMCOMMENTS OR APPROVAL CONDITIONS : p
44- p.�4�!7TOK- e 4 /O f - Qp.�.d 1,Pc 1-i k, 04 to4"�
i r. vi.,7 de s;r" b le.. . /A./74, 7. so /�... -,,-•,-_
s h.d....(d 6. -Cd.,....0
le' X41Mc Wi49 M Solo
PLEASE SIGN THE E . I .W . :
ROUTE SCHEDULE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE ROUTED /20/7AP
PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR:
REZONE MAJOR P
SITE APPROVAL nr9.�c7+-/s.S ,v HORT PLAT -7D9
SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER
SHORELINE MANAGEMENT
PERMIT OR EXEMPTION
AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE /'23/7!
SIGNATURE
OR
INITAL DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DENIAL DATE
ILDIN /- ;-0--7`8
TRAFFIC ENS X /-Z4-71
G NEERING X /A3�7�
A,L4i FIRE
/ HEALTH
C d �[1I� TiF n ) - Z3-
REVIEWER ' S COMMENTS OR APPROVAL CONDITIONS :
see 4?7Ae/w0 'wE440
` a.e.4 /3. 'o R eV67e.y ete,79F7� CdI. 7rKe 7b c.fiY u
,ocn�,eT,—z 2 /I/Pr/ be/r24 r .4-TY i dF.scc S
/r's/inet-el/S nz -4/8i9 7, D.ei r/r4.2C r f 2%�CG` A/c .tom: C 7,idty
.20 'P&r ir4.dezes>.e, !•✓• � c�i.7� itoF04,,9j` ,e040441>'
,e4 o.uS CRe44 of stfrpore;.A✓' fie rM,°d15 O L a/W S d fNee.
PfiAted 7ie.S /A L7 /i4tibv? i rrijv irl u,'-t .11.4.. /3 /e '' die �.sriCAL
l'L renA/C:#;- Ir. . Qu.tPep et,-,Tl,/-Ai 2.Co /r7-(7' o/'la 44'
,S`IRK c i ufed .
PLEASE SIGN THE E . I .W . :
• I
..L)39vwn 7 `7nty
•
S y3 /vMo /r1.Y36/010 q NIJIng�►
a� L 77If o f ss '7'd 0009 if
1,014 ed o M o 1 gry/
5tiO®s bola !M .1NavMos ' Ntf
® 0 1 7Od
tea®' , 7 .A1iW#ds b fill iv) 0 ndd 3P
kgPsf v N oz2 n 7os
ssod d sd az IV' org,/o07 t
tagin' •v z
R.l114/114/ V -OWL. c 03.LV **, a
�b►� 3IYL No O7-14c#,iQtir /S 377v
O! 9lwdlc ar3 OWL alsel L O 0 w wO70 j I
4.(07641 ..t,r olsfs :gy
--ZY00wn7 1Ab J ; woy/
el L/►z 1 ju i wl a I w ; of
( b) Apr '/ .. 27-
ENDING
OF FILE
Fig TI
TL
E