Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA72-696BEGINNINU OF FILE FILE TITLE SiZe1 4w, 9 7 MICROFILMED II H, l-- ' T s 26 ti du1: i 271 rz64 z51 ._•244 1211.13IQra`e I r s6. k ' 4 e r W i z m 1" T..'.: L .‘ \ \ t C1 ijj4 z Puget Power Company I ._90 f_ 3 '' ' ,i' Site Plan Approval, a; aI I tivit —tea sLr 1-7 --ai pp 7 —3 48 a x46 d i'' 99'' — 1. aLa 1 I, i. F.:.-.. i L..uB.,' ii F 0 -. i I I_ _ _-` 2f19' 2tlB Z B 2 g7 A-t 2I4T ZOO29 .f = z r' ° N.E.Ianla .— _..{.. _}7 -.. e i i ` I I I Y' a H E Ze 29a ti pi: Z714z zL,i1 I4 - _ I Li o ,i.., L 111d )a 'i N E - 12• ---5T ---_- 0'• N.E.-- 12 '. T. 1 i l?* .. T - i -- x,114. 1 a/'/ 3 2 3 ;1 R_ Oaf'1fi . ,,,, Q LI 110! t NE IITH 40 i v 39 O el 6 I . Illp i''z 1 s / 31F Y:,- v e i. i L V 7 ,c, 7 L[ - I ( --r I s d •s ./ /,, bi ;6 -+--Z ./'19 I' 4.x` I F r— i q s 4 ` y 37 a i--_ `.J Am zAME S hF 2Y•— .41 xa} W E 10 T. 7 j O T a3• --- =. . , .,,k . , ,il,' .1:., -,'_- r'. -- 3 -'I -_ 1. F;, 7da:\ •=O Z!-,%A ommmmm a:me o; 1"1• s N ,• 1 Q rL e m 1 •I . ' 7 8T . ,- . • . iv-, _ Y---+Yk.- _ t +y_ Fj\\ 40 a © W 1 y VL. >® O>®O A• 2 !;•°_ _i ,. s. I F,to1 z a.—Wetf 1 ^' T E 0 01 M P j{ Iz a ` 1 t r No\ , ( seesss eat; 4 I 6,4 pL N ° x 1 gaiE!I eQ Of ` s/./.' aN'°, F • T_ ' °•r+c ' pnu ,. !! i SITE PLAN APPROVAL . • b) , IPuget Sound Power & Light Co. , Appl. • No. SA-696-72 ; site Plan " • ' approval for electrical distribution substation in residential zone; Iproperty located on south side of NE 12 St. , 145 ' west of Edmonds Ave. NE APPLICANT Puget Sound Power and Light Co.TOTAL AREA 40 ,600 'sq. ft. PRINCIPAL ACCESS • N.E. 12th Street . EXISTING ZONING - G-7200 and B-1 EXISTING USE Undeveloped PROPOSED USE Electrical Distribution Substation COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Medium Density Multi-Family COMMENTS - i 1 1 'I__I Ili i t I 1..i I 9 ,I zs'' I 1 1 I , 1 ' 1 t 2> N.E. 20TH. ST. hfI illt .1-7-ill- ia 6p L_.LLLIi I 1J wi7l _._ - H E 20•w 6T.'\ zs i17292i2952TI120II. 2 f-,Ih II _ --.-, .`-.[[( S.z ' I t mII © a 66 2 r.,, I. III 1 mmum 13 ° 1 M r 291 28G i Z70 265 ^> 24`Y'` © Z14 209 , 1 j 12.,, 0 SI I. ' SO N E 1 bTN T I. 1 1--a_-• 5 u ; . r l r _> f..,. 4 .' Puget Power Company , I A\ b•piISitePlanApproval tea _.._2 i' 40 < .4 5 Ix4ro . Q6 ; A il ". Ill ' • 289 200 L66 247 !--Z=iB 24LJ 290 -29 211 Z • 4 N.E.a, .. rr m e J T_._ .___.71 fl 13 Z •,621.29 i9 30 • _ i. _-_'.:--) 4 I N. E-_- - 12 57 -_ -•. r' N E- _i2w 11iT4ro w - t 1 49 3 L4. u TA 23 Q µ' 10 aii.\//VE L(/,-.r. . 0r N E 11Tw, d xz pPa ao z ' 1 a' iy s r 55 R- 1 N o\\ 4:\ I L_i 2 . , , 3:_ 4, =t 1.- *fa u 0 37 'e 4 1 y R - d '' - i i - o 35 Fr ''z9i ,'- 'T_ tone 4' _ -- h 1 ' I b N-E ..w I' y- ' I I 4"-,--' r`'—t . 7: .t i. . ...Ert . _ -,_.:• !,,,,k,,_. a ® _ 2LI 16,,, .. ;o s = ._„. .., 1 0-- ••rod. .. Sr. e. 12 •7oF--Y 7d n ' E l , t!!!IJIIj I ^NEF i=' r• V E \ 1 e 4.,-'1 _ ;w.o I s 1` \ k 4=L,iiile 41,-,, ,,2ffin., !p_ 1 1,-.. ,-- '.. •,.; r., . . _ ,.....,_____, 1=13` WN S7. mOw 4i; 3 S. b el a ° m® sue. aCc.,col s o 1 7 1 SITE PLAN APPROVAL b) ' Puget Sound .Power &Light Co. , Appl. No. SA-696-72; site plan approval for electrical distribution substation in residential . zone; property located on south side of NE 12 ds St. , 145 ' west of EdmonAve. NE APPLICANT Puget Sound Power and Light Co,TOTAL AREA 40 ,600 sq. ft. PRINCIPAL ,ACCESS N.E. 12th Street EXISTING ZONING G-7200 and B-1 EXISTING USE 'Undeveloped PROPOSED USE Electrical Distribution Substation COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Medium Density Multi-Family I COMMENTS 5I7-e PLAk. 4;fin oVV t.— -_ City of Renton Planning Deparrbment 1. Name PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY Phone GL 4-6363 Address -P. 0. Box 868, Bellevue, WA. 98009 2. Property location On the south side of N. E. 12th Street, 145 feet west of Edmonds Avenue 3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) That portion of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 8, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, TAlaship.gton, described _as follows: The north 280 feet of the west 145 feet of the east 320 feet of the north 490.07 feet lying north of Primary State Highway No. 1 " SR 405", North Renton. Interchange; Except the public roads. N.1/2-Residenti 4. Number of acres or sq. ft.40,600 sq.ft. (0.93 Ac.) Present zoningS.1/2.- R-i 5. What do you propose to develop on this property? Electrical Distribution substation. 6. The following information shall be submitted with this application: Scale A. Site and access plan (include setbacks, existing structures, easements, and other factors limiting development) • 1" = 50 ' B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan 1" = 20 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ' D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) k. tD 2\ U t, SLYN ',., 7__ ) A l ZYG .13-:t07FOROFFICEUSEONLY File No. 'SP- 61\-1000b-72- Fe-e-- .C Date •Rec'd to-2-`t -_ Rec.-e-?-A-t No . • PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Date approved b.0-A-Z-z. Date denied Date appealed Appeal action Remarks 12/69 r.. DEDICATION'OF RIGHT OF WAY THE GRANTOR, 'PUGET .SOUND POWER LIGHT COMPANY, a Washington corporation, forand ' n'consideration'of' One Dollar and other :good and valuable consideration,":'• ;:, in,'hand paid, dedicates,: grants and, conveys to the CITY OF'RENTON, a, municipal. corporation .of the _State of Washington,.,a right of way for street purposes,over' y!l; ' . I', the° followin described'real estate situated in the County of Kin , State, of Washington:- The, northerl 30 .feet of:the followingdescribed property::!.; Y:.'. P P tY r. =.;t, All that portion of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section r ; 8, Township:23 North, :Range 5 East, W.M: , in'King County, Washington; described as follows lip P'' The north' 280. feet'of the':west. 145 ,feet of the east 320 feet of the north 490.07.'feet lying northerly of Primary State.Highway' #1, (SR 40,5) ,...,: ;,:,,...., ,,,,,'-;,,,,,::::: ,,, N North Renton Interchange, ,' ofwai ;.rightshts. EXCEPT publicP g Y• tq': a9 9;'1 f A" IN !WITNESS WHEREOF'; said corporation has :caused this instrument to be executed _ . s'`b `''its'' pro er'officer:f;': Y P .P n." UG;1' SOUND POWER LIGHT.COMPANYP F'I 7 i hlana ex Real EstateDivision . i STATE OF WASHINGTON - ss: lip F KINGCO '0 NUNTY µf .` On'this o J`'- dayof ' 1972 before. me,' the'undersi ed J', '' ;;, personally appeared'LESLIE A DONNER, to me .lmown to be the Manager, Real Estate '1. ri'",'_; : ; Division, of PUGET SOUND POWER , LIGHT COMPANY, the corporation that executed the ,{ foregoing instrument,. and acknowledged the' said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses an purposes therein ,.. mentioned, 'and'on oath' stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument. . ,:'. k WITNESS MY_HAND'AND OFFICIAL SEAL hereto affixed the day andWyearfirstabove written. 9/fJ•n 4 y 11 Notary Pub is in an for. the State of Washington, residing at Gc,-;21-, it _ ._. v U V ce C.) %60 PLANNING DEPARTMENT • RENTON,WASHINGTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING • RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 • BA 8-3310 ysQ° R' CAPITA-°` July 6 , 1972 Puget Sound Power & Light Company P. 0. Box 868 Bellevue, Washington 98009 Re: Application No. SA-696-72 Site plan approval for electrical distribution substation to be located in residential zone on south side of NE 12th Street, 145 ' west of Edmonds Avenue NE; Renton, Washington Gentlemen: The Planning Commission at its public hearing meeting of June 28, 1972 , completed its review of the above-noted application. The Planning Commission approved the application subject to the provision of additional landscaping and the dedi- cation of thirty feet of right-of-way on the northerly property line for the widening of NE 12th Street. Approval of final development plans by city departments and dedication of said right-of-way will be required to expedite the proposed development. Consultation with the Planning Department will be necessary to finalize the action of the Planning Commission. If you have any questions , please contact Dick Hansen of this department. Very truly yours , Gordon Y. Ericksen Planning Director 1.PLANNING COMMISSION • RENTON, WASHINGTON mmiR E'MUNICIPAL BUILDING • REN TON WASHINGTON 98055 • 235-2550 O pA 0. op 0 July 5 , 1972 It D SE P'.1 Puget Sound Power & Light Company P. 0. Box 868 Bellevue, Washington 98009 Re: Site Plan Approvals for Power Substations Gentlemen: The Planning Commission at its public hearing meeting of June 28 , 1972 , reviewed in detail the proposed development plans for the electrical distribution substation to be located on NE 12th Street, 145 feet west of Edmonds Avenue NE, in Renton. It is the duty of the Planning Commission to review said applications in accordance with the requirements of the zoning ordinance as quoted below: 4-706 : R-.1 Residence Single Family: In the R-1 Residence Single Family District, no building or premises shall be used and no building shall be hereafter erected or structurally altered, unless otherwise provided for in this Chapter , except for one or more of the following purposes or similar uses : 3) Quasi public institutions . . . .upon approval by the Planning Commission of the use, plans , design and determination that the development is not detrimental to the adjacent surrounding prop- erties and the enjoyment thereof. During the course of the discussion, Planning Commission members expressed concern regarding the acquisition of sites prior to Planning Commission approval. It is the Planning Commission' s recommendation that your company consult with the Planning staff at an early date to review possible alternate locations prior to acquisition. Such action would, in the eyes of the Planning Com- mission, result in more desirable location of power facilities and reduce the impact of said facilities on the adjacent area. Puget Sound Power & Light Company July 5 , 1972 Page 2 It is the desire of the Planning Commission to work with Puget Sound Power & Light Company in order to maximize the opportunity to achieve a desirable residential development in the community at the same time enhancing the ability of your public utility to serve the community. The Planning Commission would be happy to discuss the subject matter with company officials if you so desire. Very truly yours, Clark Teegarden, Chairman Renton Planning Commission Renton Planning Commission Meeting June 28, 1972 . Minutes - Page 3 SITE PLAN APPROVALS: b) PUGET SOUND. POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, Appl. No. SA-696-72; site plan approval for electrical distribution substation in residential zone; property located on south side of NE 12th Street, 145 ' west of Edmonds Avenue NE The Chairman described the application. The Assistant Planner pointed out property location, described existing surrounding zoning and displayed site plan, vicinity map and landscape plan.: The Engineering Department has requested that the northerly thirty feet of subject property along NE 12th Street be dedi cated for street purposes. Planning staff recommends additional , landscaping be provided on the west property line with the inclusion among the natural vegetation of English laurel planted , at five feet on center which would provide a more dense screen for the residential property', to the west. Slides of the property were shown. Mr. Kent Meek, .16927. NE 97th, Redmond, Washington, representing the applicant, spoke on behalf of the site plan approval request and presented a basic explanation of an electrical distribution substation and its function. . He also showed slides of existing substations with development of improved screening and landscap- ing techniques, as well as a map of existing substations in the .. east Renton area together with the proposed development depicted thereon. The proposed substation is intended to serve that area bounded by FAI 405 , N. 30th .Street, Monroe Avenue NE and NE 4th Street. ' Upon Commission inquiry, Mr. Meek stated the site had beenchosen for its proximity to the area to be served, its location close to the load center, the fact that a minimum of feeder line :reloca- tion would be necessary, and the price factor. Seymour expressed concern regarding the turnaround driveway shown at the westerly property line. Mr. Meek stated the Plan- rung staff had indicated the same concern, and the matter had been thoroughly reviewed. The driveway could not be located on the easterly property line due to steep topography. If the driveway were located more centrally on the property, a good deal of existing vegetation and landscaping would have to be removed which would be undesirable. As the proposed driveway would be used on an average of once a week and would be densely screened, he felt the location as shown would not be a problem. Ross , inquired regarding plans for disposal of storm water :run- . off. Mr. Meek responded that it is intended, to collect water ' in drain tile placed on the perimeter of the property and run it back southerly into a dry well. . This matter has been reviewed with the Engineering Department. The substation would not Create a lot of surface water runoff as the only,: hard surfaced areas will be the paved approach off 12th plus the cement pads for- some off the. equipment...• Ross asked if consideration had been given' to ' recessing thelsite which would solve the problems of screening, noise and: water runoff. Mr. Meek replied that the site , when leveled, would be recessed on the east; but recession of the station, unless it were lowered , at least twenty feet, would not eliminate the noise factor. Considerable discussion ensued concerning the noise generated by the proposed development,' which Mr. Meek felt to be of flow constant hum nature, easily masked by traffic and other usual t environmental sounds. Discussion of the decibel ratings around various points of the site ensued among Commission members; and Mr. Meek. 1 Renton Planning Commission Meeting June 28 , 1972 Minutes - Page 4 Seymour inquired regarding the possibility of undergrounding the substation and the feeder lines coming into it. Mr. Meek replied that Puget Power has tried to design the structure to be as attractive as anything of this nature can be and still be economically feasible. Puget Power operates on a fixed rate basis and.,economics are an important factor. Puget Power klooks forward to the day when undergrounding electrical distri- bution substations can be accomplished reliably and economically. Test undergroundings have been made with the result thus far that the heat generated tends to break down the underground conduit, and the whole system burns out. Thus far there has been no system developed that will operate reliably undergroun •d in this area. Seymour asked if the applicant had previously owned the site on which the proposed facility would be developed or was it pur- chased for this particular purpose. Mr. Meek replied that ,the property was purchased for this particular purpose; that Puget Power has followed this procedure in the past, relying on its ability to satisfy the requirements of the various municipalities . Additional audience comments were invited, Mr. Fred Wandling, 2331 NE 12th Street, questioned the size of the installation and the noise levels that would be generated. Mr. Meek replied that a single bank transformer would be installed initially with resulting noise levels ranging. from 31 decibels to 49 decibels measured at the property line at various points around the _per- imeter of the site. It has been Puget Power' s experience that service demands double in approximately eight years. If, this holds true, it is Puget Power ' s intention to install an addi- tional transformer on the site for double bank service. This, however, would not result in doubling the noise factor. The noise would be increased about three decibels or approximately five percent. The Chairman asked if from the standpoint of noise level, the proposed substation would compare approximately with the ones in Bellevue and Eastgate viewed by the Commission on its 'field trip. Mr. Meek replied that it did so compare and that Puget Power has been installing the lower decibel rated transformers in residential areas. Following additional discussion, it was MOVED BY HUMBLE, . SECONDED BY DENIER, THAT THE, HEARING BE CLOSED. On the question, Seymour stated she would like to see more in- put on recessing or undergrounding the installation before the hearing is closed; that while she understood Mr. Meek' s comments concerning economics of undergrounding, she feels there would be detrimental effects from the proposed installation and she is not ready to make a determination on the matter. Seymour indicated continuing concern regarding the turnaround driveway shown on the west property line and the fact that staff had made recommendations regarding additional landscaping which were not discussed. It was noted by other Commission members that closing the hear- ing would still permit continuing the matter if more staff input was felt desirable. Seymour noted, however, that additional public input would be cut off . Ross stated he felt all the questions raised had been answered to his satisfaction. Pending MOTION CARRIED. se Renton Planning Commission Meeting June 28, 1972 Minutes - Page 5 Mola asked the Assistant Planner if the applicant had agreed to the various staff recommendations shown on the staff 'report furnished each Commissioner. The Assistant Planner replied that Puget Power had indicated it would abide by the conditions noted in the staff report. ACTION: MOVED BY MOLA , SECONDED BY DENZER , THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVE THE PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY SITE PLAN APPLICA- TION FOR AN ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SUBSTATION SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING AND DEDICATION OF THIRTY FEET FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY PURPOSES ON THE NORTHERLY PROPERTY LINE FOR NE 12TH STREET AS RECOMMENDED IN THE STAFF REPORT DATED JUNE 28 , 1972 . On the motion, Seymour stated it was still her point that while she was not opposed to locating the facility on this site, she was not convinced that since such a facility has an impact on residential areas that the Commission has done everything possi- ble to eliminate as many of the detrimental effects as possible. Seymour stated further she felt that the questions raised were not resolved fully and the whole matter should be looked into further. Ross disagreed with Seymour' s contentions, stating that he has seen new residential developments that were more detrimental to existing neighbors than the proposed site with adequate maintenance, low noise levels , screening and landscaping. PENDING MOTION CARRIED, SEYMOUR DISSENTING. The meeting was recessed at 10 :40 p.m. and was reconvened at 10 :50 p.m. Roll call was taken with all Commissioners previously listed responding present. With further reference to the Puget Sound Power & Light Company matter, it was MOVED BY SEYMOUR, SECONDED BY ROSS, THAT A LETTER BE FORWARDED TO PUGET POWER, SIGNED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN, RECOMMENDING CONSULTATION WITH THE PLANNING STAFF PRIOR TO ACQUISITION OF PROPERTIES FOR SUBSTATIONS. MOTION CARRIED. c) BRAIN, DR. WARREN, Appl. No. SA-697-72; site plan approval for medical offices in P-1 zone; property located north of Valley General Hospital between Talbot Rd. S. and freeway The Chairman described the application, noting it was the ,,same property recently before the Planning Commission for rezone from G-9600 to P-1. The Assistant Planner displayed vicinity map, site and landscap- ing plans. It is the applicant' s intent to convert the upper floor of the residence into dental offices and expand the parking areas to meet ordinance requirements . All existing landscaping will be retained. In addition, two parking areas to the west are shown for future development in the event the lower floor is converted for professional office use. The Engineering Department has requested an additional ten feet of right-of- way along the westerly side of Talbot Road S. Dr. Brain has stated he would be in agreement with the dedication requested. J Junel4, 1972 TO:: :Dick Hansen, Planning Departmen t . FROP I:, -"R. -Lyman Houk,-- Engineering:Departmen t;' • SUBJECT: ' Puget Power Site `Approval N.E: •12th•Street Dear Dick: • - In response to your memo of June 12, .1972., regarding the.Puget-Sound PowerandLightsite, approval :plan '.please be advised that right-of-way should be• ' requested:-over.the North 30 feet to—conform with- right-of-way •previouslyacquired, to the west and,that off-site i irprovements would also be required, •Practically speaking; however, installation of these off-site improvements may be. :premature at this, tithe. As you know, .only the Board of Public Workscangrantanyvariance; from: the off-site improvements requirements. It should - probably be•suggested to -Puget. Power that they request some modification to the off-s.i te- improvements from the•Board of Public Works Please-let• me •know if you need. ' any 'additional Information ,regarding this item. RLH;m Renton Planning Commission Meeting June: .14,.. ,1972 Minutes - Page 2 REZONE APPLICATION a) EVOY;. DR. ROBERT, Appl. ' No. R-698-72; rezone from P-i to B-1; property located on S. 4th Place between Rainier and Shattuck- Ayes. S. I.. ; '. The Assistant Planner described the rezone application, ..noting the property is located: directly south of the former Valley General Hospital- site, .'now. .the location .of. K-Mart. Vicinity map and site plan were ..displayed.. Slides of the property, were shown. The Planning Director noted the proposed use for .retail stores' is in agreement with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Ross inquired regarding need for additional right-of=way• on Shattuck and whether there is a plan for improving . the. Shattuck '' , underpass: Lyman Houk'' of the Engineering Department replied, i.:: there would:be some additional right-of-way required from the , ' railroad. A date for improvement of. Shattuck has not been ti, i,7 sir established' at this ,time. SITE PLAN APPROVAL APPLICATIONS b) PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT CO. A 1. No: SA-696:72; site t ,plan approval for electrical distribution substation in resi dential zone; property located on south side of NE 12th St. , 145 ' west of Edmonds Ave'. NE . The. Assistant. Planner described the application and displayed vicinity map and: site plan. Slides were shown. .... The property presently zoned single family residential except for portion to the south zoned commercial. :Future access to. the southerly. portion zoned commercial is via a twenty foot access road along the west side of the property from NE 12th Street. The :.applicant•proposes to set the substation back thirty ,feet from the.• existing right-of-way line of NE 12th Street to allow for : future street 'widening. The natural vegetation of •the,,, area will be maintained. Landscaping will be provided to screen the proposed substation. '. The Assistant Planner advised that he had visited the sites of three existing substations in. the. area, and it appears : thatr noise generated by the development may have a decided impact H. on the surrounding area. The Commission may wish to consider _ a more densely landscaped buffer along the west property for the 'protection of the adjacent single family residence?. Also, additional- screening on the westerly, property line 'would be:desirable because if the twenty-foot easement strip were developed, some landscaping would be removed. Considerable discussion ensued. among Commission members and staff concerning the proposed substation, type of installation, environmental impact on the surrounding area due to sight and noise. It was also noted b Commission members that the size of the proposed site would permit addition of more transformers , than presently proposed, causing increased noise with possible detrimental effects on surrounding properties The. Planning Director advised that public utilities are .per•- mitted in single family zones upon approval by the Planning Commission of the use, plans, design and determination that the development would not be detrimental,to the adjacent sur-' rounding properties and the _enjoyment thereof. The Planning Director stated' further that consultation. by Puget Sound Power i';,,.Light. Company with the staff and the Planning Commission prior _ I - Renton Planning Commission Meeting June 14,. 1972 . 1 Minutes - Page 3 to selection of .substation sites would be desirable.' Thet;-''ap ' fi,:::', ..' plicant,' however; has purchased subject-.property for the use Proposed. During ,the .course of .the ..lengthy. discussion', :it' was . generally agreed by the Planning Commission that contact should be es=. tablished with the applicant to determine future expansion plans for subject site and that existing., substations would be 1 ` visited on .a .Planning. Commission. field trip prior : to the public hearing meeting 'of June 28 , 1972 f:' c) BRAIN, DR. WARREN; Appl. . No. SA-697-72; site plan approval • for medical offices in P-1 zone; property located north of Valley General Hospital between Talbot Road Si and freeway The Assistant Planner:described the application, pointed ,out . ..' property 'location and displayed vicinity map, - site plan;: and landscaping :and parking plan. It is the intent of. the appli cant.'to remodel the' main floor of the: existing residence for ' i + 1 dental' offices. Proposed parking ,includes not only. required parking for the main floor dental offices to be readied . for immediate use, but 'additional parking for . the . lower level should suitable tenants be • found in the future. . The applicant' . has indicated he has no intention at: this time of utilizing ' the lower• level level. : All All existing landscaping. will. be retained. - Slides of the property and the ,existing landscaping were shown The Commission' noted that with the exception of the additional i''1;iV:4 parking areas shown for future. .use, the plan is essentiallyll t',.'":::,;`';;-'.':- the same as viewed during',.the recent rezone hearing on subject property- :Ross stated. that. until. the .applicant -.is more specific; regarding:.the lower level occupancy, approval of-:the additional: parking areas shown :would be premature. 4. ' ADMINISTRATIVE . a): FIELD, TRIP .AND STUDY 'SESSI.ON DATES After ' discussion,was determined that :the .Plannin ,:Commission.x. t,, Planning Commission.: conduct a •=field. trip on Wednesday, . June 21, .1972; 'members 1•• : :to meet: at the Municipal Building. at 7 :30 p.m.,, . to ,view the new " 3j' ., items of business,' particularly the Puget Sound Power & Light 4". '' ''':-'Company site approval application site and existing substations cin. the area.. b) COMMITTEE MEETING DATES AND REPORTS 1) : ZONING COMMITTEE--Committee Chairman Ross announced a tentative meeting date with the Downtown Steering ' Committee for Thursday, June 15, 1972, 7 : 30 p..in. 2) `COMMUNITY 'SERVICES COMMITTEE--Committee Chairman Scholes stated his committee had met with reference : to the Environmental Awards program and had reviewed 1';the summary report submitted by the original Environ- mental Awards. Committee , prior to referral of the matter: to 'the- Community Services Committee for: imple- I' '' ,' *"' ` '' i mentation. This summary report laid down guidelines concerning -purpose of awards, primary areas of concern,,. procedure for granting of awards, format, and possible nominations. The committee has decided to duplicate , ' 4G t1 4:' NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEADING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION AT ITS REGULAR MEETING IN _ THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON JUNE 28 1972 , AT 8 : 00 P .M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : - 1/4)(Nek ® -A. SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SUBSTATION IN RESIDENTIAL ZONE; property located on south side of NE 12 St. , 145 ' west of Edmonds Ave. NE. SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR MEDICAL OFFICES IN P-1 ZONE; property located north of Valley General Hospital between Talbot Rd. S . and freeway. REZONE FROM P-1 TO B-l; property located on S . 4 Pl . between Rainier and Shattuck Ayes.. S. Legal description on file in Planning Dept. office. ALL PERSONS INTERESTED OR OBJECTING TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ON JUNE 28 , 1972 , AT , 8 : 00 P.M . TO VOICE THEIR PROTESTS OR OBJECTIONS TO SAME . ANTHONE R. MOLA , SECRETARY PUBLISHED June 16, 1972 RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION y CERTIFICATION I, Richard B. Hansen , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE , , DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW . R. ATTEST:: Subscribed and sworn SIG E . a-r...,/- to before me, a Notary Public , on the 16 day of June 19 72 . ENDING OF FILE FILE TITLE 9 72