The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA77-041I / AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King ' ) Marilyn J. Petersen being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 9th day of May 19 77 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. 1542 Subscribed and sworn this- day of //9)c:/..., 197? c30111.s 1 t Notary Public in and for the of Washington, residing at a 4ai +Je+•- Application, Petition or Case: Donald L. Luedke, R-041-77 lr."h The m.inutea contain a Us-t of the pant%es h.econd) R-041-77 Page Two about the setback requirements imposed by the Planning Department. Mr. Smith indicated that the setbacks were increased to establish protection to adjacent properties, reduce impact, and establish reasonable upgrading of the site. The Examiner inquired about previous applications establishing duration of rezone, and Mr. Smith reported that a condition had been used in the past, e.g. the Stoneway rezone arplication. In light of new information submitted by the Utilities Division, the applicant requested a ten-minute recess to allow consultation with residents in attendance at the hearing. The Examiner called for a ten-minute recess at 10:50 a.m. The meeting was reconvened at 11:00 a.m. Mr. Richard Houghton, Utilities Division, briefly summarized the history of the pumping station located at N.E. Sunset Blvd. and Union Avenue N.E. and stated that the subject station had been redesigned in the late 1960's, but because of recent development of multiple family residential dwellings in the area, the station was presently over capacity and the city had no anticipation of increasing the capacity at this time. He indicated that federal funds for a grant had been requested which would establish a trunk line through May Creek and Honey Creek and would.eliminate the present lift station. However, he reported that the request had not yet been approved. Mr. Smith asked Mr. Houghton if the station would provide suitable water capacity for fire flow in a multiple family development. Mr. Houghton indicated that review of the final plans for the structure would be necessary for that determination, but he could foresee no difficulties for that function at this time. The Examiner asked for comments from the applicant. Responding was: Donald L. Luedke 3916 N.E. 12th Street Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Luedke stated that in view of residential opposition and new information from the Utilities Division, he wished to change his application from a request for multiple family residential zoning to a subdivision or short plat application, and asked if the permit fee could be transferred. The Examiner asked if the application was being formally withdrawn. Mr. Luedke responded affirmatively. Mr. Smith indicated that he would research the matter of transferring the fee and noted that the applicant must provide necessary information to the Planning Department to proceed with the short plat application. Mr. Luedke thanked participants for their aid in the application process. The Examiner asked if the opposition had designated a representative to coordinate with the city on a new application. Responding was: Nick Petruska 1174 Shelton Avenue N.E. Renton, WA 98055 The Examiner asked that Mr. Petruska be notified by the Planning Department of receipt of a new application and that he receive all pertinent data relating to the request. Mr. Smith reported that in view of recent information from Utilities Division and concerns of residents in the area, the Planning Department would recommend denial of the application because of conflict with objectives stated in the Land Use Report, 1965, Policy Statement, Comprehensive Plan, Renton Urban Area, 1965, and because of constitution of spot zoning, but indicated the department's cooperation with the applicant in changing the request to plat the area. The Examiner asked for further comments. Since there were none, the hearing on Item #R-041-77 was closed by the Examiner at 11:26 a.m. L. i Beeler Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 9th day of May, 1977, by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Donald L. Luedke Nick Petruska May 6, 1977 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICANT: Donald L. Luedke FILE NO. R-041-77 LOCATION: 3916 N.E. 12th Street SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests rezone from G-7200 to R-2 to allow construction of low density multi-family dwellings in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan for the area. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Recommend approval with restrictive RECOMMENDATION: covenants running with the land. Hearing Examiner: , Application withdrawn by applicant. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department staff report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on April 26, 1977. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: Thehearing was opened on May 3, 1977, at 10:20 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were sworn. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the! applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. Michael Smith, Planning Department, *reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: Exhibit #2: Vicinity Map. Exhibit #3: Site Plan. The Examiner asked Mr. Smith for additional comments or exhibits. Mr. Smith reported receipt of a letter from the Utilities Division which indicated that the existing pumping station located at Union Avenue N.E. and N.E. Sunset. Boulevard is currently at design capacity, and felt the information contained in the letter was significant. At this time, the Examiner requested Mr. Smith to contact a representative from the Utilities Division to attend the hearing and clarify the matter. Mr. Smith indicated a desire to withhold final recommendation on the application from the Planning Department until testimony from residents in attendance was completed, and stated that a petition signed by 225 residents in the area as well as new information on sewer capabilities was a' concern. The Examiner requested Mr. Smith to read the petition into the record and it was labeled Exhibit #4. The Examiner asked Mr. Smith if additional applications had been submitted for rezoning from the property located between the two arterials. Mr. Smith reported that no other applications had been submitted to his knowledge, and the zoning since the time of annexation had been G-7200. The 'Examiner inquired about the city's traditional interpretation of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Mr. Smith responded that the map was a flexible document which is general in nature and used as reference in conjunction with other city policies and guidelines. He reported that the subject policies address intrusion into an established neighborhood, but that in this application, the Planning Department felt the subject property was located within a blighted area and the rezone would serve to upgrade the neighborhood. The Examiner inquired about the legal posting requirements for,, the application and conformance to such requirements. Mr. Smith responded that all legal requirements for posting had been accomplished prior to April 24, 1977. The Examiner inquired R-041-77 Page Three TRANSMITTED THIS 9th day of May, 1977 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Council President George J. Perry Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Councilwoman Patricia Thorpe Councilwoman Barbara Shinpoch Councilman William Grant Councilman Ken Bruce Councilman Earl Clymer Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Don J. Smith, Renton Record-Chronicle II ii 71 Xi a 5 1 MAY 1, 1977 l i WE, the undersigned residents of Renton, Washington, have studied and are familiar with the proposed Rezone request known as the Donald L. Luedke Rezone •Request from G-7200 to R-2, File No. R-041-77, located at 3916 - N. E. 12th St. , Renton, Washington, We' object to the granting of this Rezone request for the following reasons: 1, The above rezoning request does not comply with the Renton Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, Revised August, 1976. 2. Granting of the rezone request would increase the traffic problem which already exists on N. E. 12th Street and would further jeopardize the safety of children walking to school, 3. The increase in population would increase the overcrowding in the schools, 4. Existing sewers are not designed for multi-family use, 5. The effect of this rezoning would increase the existing imbalance of multi-family dwellings in the affected area, 6. The rezoning would create a spot zone of R-2 zoning within the existing single-family residential zone. This would also open the way for other property owners to reasonably expect similar requests in zoning changes. 7. Multi-family development will increase the noise pollution in the area, 8. This zoning change would reduce the marketability of single- family residences in the immediate area. The general result of this zoning change would be to significantly reduce the quality of life now existing in the neighborhood, For this reason the majority of property owners in the neighborhood strongly oppose this request for rezoning. Name (please print) Signature Address 4- 1. B . R., . grY 11-10-r ki-) 3,-.4.--1"-' 392_8 pE [ IR— eL . 1 i 2. ,!EA E. 6 2,,9nlT (k ra- 3%a 'J Q .AJL 3. ! , 86) 4 eicioe+/re /d/t/47-,"1 level A/1- / 2 1 7-4. J x/1Lsl2 6J4 . 1/ 2 //,. • /, 7--- Cr 5. $c 1'- NziJ Ley 1-7 J 6- r-r S.1-1c - (0 et i c 1 P//CcACC/.( /l l.S-T/-c o' 4 A-O&O , 7• B y 4 4 ice t_1r t-2 Yl 8, , r C r4 y'- rHQ 4., .i/ . i r 9. -MAR R A bhof+- n j -2. Q`-L(b 14- 11 so emna 4 vt. ALE 10.(JJf/1 4q G, /Watt Wt ii5o 7 c -7 19 ivy . 11. AC L& , 4,7( at&I 1 L 21, 7-79-6ei"s9 / /cr-, /1? 1 12,1 u/!1 c% )1 l 1/{ u r 1v 11 TA Ci,/l k / 7JG• /1!)• C? RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER EXHIBIT NOMAY81977 AM PM a'igt9tl01ll01201 r2i3i4c7,6 E O. /C- 0-/`- 7 `7 MAY 1, 1977 1 WE, the undersigned residents of Renton, Washington, have studied and are familiar with the proposed Rezone request known as the Donald L. Luedke Rezone Request from G-7200 to R-2, File No. R-041-77, located at 3916 - N. E. 12th St. , Renton, Washington. We object to the granting of this Rezone request for the following reasons: 1. The above rezoning request does not comply with the Renton I IUrbanAreaComprehensivePlan, Revised August, 1976. 2. Granting of the rezone request would increase the traffic problem which already exists on N. E. 12th Street and would further jeopardize the safety of children walking to school. 3. The increase .in population would increase the overcrowding in the schools. 4; Existing sewers are not designed for multi-family use. 5. The effect of this rezoning would increase the existing imbalance of multi-family dwellings in the affected area. 6. The rezoning would create a spot zone of R-2 zoning within the existing single-family residential zone. This would also open the way for other property owners to reasonably expect similar requests in zoning changes. 7. Multi-family development will increase the noise pollution in the area. - 8. This zoning change would reduce the marketability of single- family residences in the immediate area. The general result of this zoning change would be to significantly reduce the quality of life now existing in the neighborhood. For this reason the majority of property owners in the neighborhood strongly oppose this request for rezoning. Name (please print) . Signature Address 1. AM K E. ff//, -z/t-A e U' w ,t. , .1572 `4/b PI. 6 i e,.J l 2.A-77(cl`l,' / 'r— - f /,Q ' A' r9`i=f- ,'_ luny 3. Toe V} I)u c 3C30 N 100, PI Pat toy 33---)sA4 i0T/4. l 724/,cl , ,'0 3 2%S e 7/ ,fir".To 5.T ?v 3so O # eI /4r7n 6. 233 q 27e /ca, ,L Q47 8• n •Q -1.1 ',) /1. 11' 1(_Y.Gfr 1 ,Q-1•cJ a l.f r 3s 3 4/E- /u 9 U 10. 11. 12. MAY. 1, 1977 WE, the undersigned residents of Renton, Washington, have studied and are familiar with the proposed Rezone request known as the Donald L. Luedke Rezone Request from G-7200 to R-2, File No. R-041-77, located at 3916 - N. E. 12th St. , Renton, Washington. We object to the granting of this Rezone request for the following reasons: 1. The above rezoning request does not comply with the Renton 1 Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, Revised August, 1976. 2. Granting of the rezone request would increase the traffic problem which already exists on N. E. 12th Street and would further jeopardize the safety of children walking to school. 3. The increase in population would increase the overcrowding in the schools. 4. Existing sewers are not designed for multi-family use. 15. The effect of this rezoning would increase the existing imbalance of multi-family dwellings in the affected area. 6. The rezoning would create a spot zone of R-2 zoning within the existing single-family residential zone. This would also open the way for other property owners to reasonably expect similar requests in zoning changes. 7. Multi-family development will increase the noise pollution in the area. L8. This zoning change would reduce the marketability of single- family residences in the immediate area. The general result of this zoning change would be to significantly reduce the quality of life now existing in the neighborhood. For this reason the majority of property owners in the neighborhood strongly oppose this request for rezoning. Name (please print) Signature Address 1. it A o/-cz: a/Le nt 2. 2 M Its 14r44.c s 1ti./7Y-r 0 / f 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. I MAY 1, 1977 WE, the undersigned residents of Renton, Washington, have studied and are familiar with the proposed Rezone request known as the Donald L. Luedke Rezone Request from G-7200 to R-2, File No. R-041-77, located at 3916 - N. E. 12th St. , Renton, Washington. We object to the granting of this Rezone request for the following reasons: 1. The above rezoning request does not comply with the Renton Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, Revised August, 1976. 2. Granting of the rezone request would increase the traffic problem which already exists on N. E. 12th Street and would further jeopardize the safety of children walking to school, 3. The increase in population would increase the overcrowding in the schools. 4. Existing sewers are not designed for multi-family use. 5. The effect of this rezoning would increase the existing imbalance of multi-family dwellings in the affected area, 6. The rezoning would create a spot zone of R-2 zoning within the existing single-family residential zone. This would also open the way for other property owners to reasonably expect similar requests in zoning changes. 7. Multi-family development will increase the noise pollution in the area, 8, This zoning change would reduce the marketability of single- family residences in the immediate area. The general result of this zoning change would be to significantly reduce the quality of life now existing in the neighborhood. For this reason the majority of property owners in the neighborhood strongly oppose this request for rezoning. Name (please print) Signature Address 1. f tIli acir G. F0 ,4, e,il 2 'u i'(cW rt., i fl/ a l ye /V y fljp rr,! G1 0Li Yd'v c-Sc r-- i - tom , 5. It47. Qe-qC 7?fettzi,G 6. e T Z- L. B/a.Fit' 1 CcJ 4 4-1«/ld. 7. /P L .D. 17l4 c...&ie '/ ,O,r %' z` — //s/ si/6,r7.5.t iv 8, 9. 10. 12, MAY 1, 1977 WE, the undersigned residents of Renton, Washington, have studied and are familiar with the proposed Rezone request known as the Donald L. Luedke Rezone Request from G-7200 to R-2, File No, R-041-77, located at 3916 - N. E. 12th St. , Renton, Washington. We object to the granting of this Rezone request for the following reasons: 1. The above rezoning request does not comply with the Renton Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, Revised August, 1976. 2. Granting of the rezone request would increase the traffic problem which already exists on N. E. 12th Street and would further jeopardize the safety of children walking to school. 3. The increase in population would increase the overcrowding in the schools. 4. Existing sewers are not designed for multi-family use. 5. The effect of this rezoning would increase the existing imbalance of multi-family dwellings in the affected area. 6. The rezoning would create a spot zone of R-2 zoning within the existing single-family residential zone. This would also open the way for other property owners to reasonably expect similar requests in zoning changes. 7. Multi-family development will increase the noise pollution in the area. 8. This zoning change would reduce the marketability of single- family residences in the immediate area. The general result of this zoning change would be to significantly reduce the quality of life now existing in the neighborhood. For this reason the majority of property owners in the neighborhood strongly oppose this request for rezoning. Name (please print) Signature Address 1. ;;72/ 2. 3. 4.. 5, 6. ' 7. 8. 9. 10.' 11. 12.' MAY 1, 1977 WE, the undersigned residents of Renton, Washington, have studied and are familiar with the proposed Rezone request known as the Donald L. Luedke Rezone Request from G-7200 to R-2, File No. R-041-77, located at 3916 - N. E. 12th St. , Renton, Washington. We object to the granting of this Rezone request for the following reasons: 1. The above rezoning request does not comply with the Renton Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, Revised August, 1976. 2. Granting of the rezone request would increase the traffic problem which already exists on N. E. 12th Street and would further jeopardize the safety of children walking to school. 3. The increase in population would increase the overcrowding in the schools. 4. Existing sewers are not designed for multi-family use. 5. The effect of this rezoning would increase the existing imbalance of multi-family dwellings in the affected area. 6. The rezoning would create a spot zone of R-2 zoning within the existing single-family residential zone. This would also open the way for other property owners to reasonably expect similar requests in zoning changes. 7. Multi-family development will increase the noise pollution in the area. 8. This zoning change would reduce the marketability of single- family residences in the immediate area. The general result of this zoning change would be to significantly reduce the quality of life now existing in the neighborhood. For this reason the majority of property owners in the neighborhood strongly oppose this request for rezoning. Name (please print) Si na re Address 2. )79 64 W, ,t) a ,etec jai ,l. f. /1119-6 w 3.01/4 , h) gfwr ln i5' /I/ k•e-(ic 32.Z/VF'Z 4. aid, l/-4 . L 6 f Pe.,w 6-0 4(f (' 5. 1 A IN IJ I s_ (f! () ..„, tr• 0 lA cI? y n /!- .4/G . 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 1 MAY 1, 1977 WE, the undersigned residents of Renton, Washington, have studied and are familiar with the proposed Rezone request known as the Donald L. Luedke Rezone Request from G-7200 to R-2, File No. R-041-77, located at 3916 - N. E. 12th St. , Renton, Washington. We object to the granting of this Rezone request for the following reasons: 1. The above rezoning request does not comply with the Renton Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, Revised August, 1976. 2. Granting of the rezone request would increase the traffic problem which already exists on N. E. 12th Street and would further jeopardize the safety of children walking to school. 3. The increase in population would increase the overcrowding in the schools. 4. Existing sewers are not designed for multi-family use. 5. The effect of this rezoning would increase the existing imbalance of multi-family dwellings in the affected. area. 6. The rezoning would create a spot zone of R-2 zoning within the existing single-family residential zone. This would also open the way for other property owners to reasonably expect similar requests in zoning changes. 7. Multi-family development will increase the noise pollution in the area. 8. This zoning change would reduce the marketability of single- family residences in the immediate area. The general result of this zoning change would be to significantly reduce the quality of life now existing in the neighborhood. For this reason the majority of property owners in the neighborhood strongly oppose this request for rezoning. Name (please print) Signature Address 1. k )c. /:! We, 5 ,'- c ,. /jc 3. -1,v r . „,., ` _z;715;4-- c S - 7) (.7 6•., 11 A J- ) 5. r:j/ ,'i /% is!' , 6. // ( Y 4f c) ,I /7- TA- I 8• 0-v.'( c/C- / (/c/(;f _' 4' 1f.: l t %G' ( ` •'- r^. ae71 O• Cit_1.'i.h ii ..i M1-7.. -% r / } r 7 - A, • boRi5 pi. OE J()_ ti 7 11 ' 1 de-) 0 4 y Yl•E /C Y tf" 12. ??l: 4! Ye EVj ZPIMPr i,10j y iil l,u v v n.2 j3er,g 77,f .1(`',/ Sfr I 1 MAY 1, 1977 WE, the undersigned residents of Renton, Washington, have studied and are familiar with the proposed Rezone request known as the Donald L. Luedke Rezone Request from G-7200 to R-2, File No. R-041-77, located at 3916 - .N. E. :12th St. , Renton, Washington. We object to the granting of this Rezone request for the following reasons: 1. The above rezoning request does not comply with the Renton Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, Revised August, 1976. 2. Granting of the rezone request would increase the traffic problem which already exists on N. E. 12th Street and would further jeopardize the safety of children walking to school. 3. ' The increase in population would increase the overcrowding in the schools-. 4. Existing sewers' are not designed for multi-family use. 5. The effect of this rezoning would increase the existing imbalance of multi-family dwellings in the affected area. 6. : The rezoning would create a spot zone of R-2 zoning within the existing single-family residential zone. This would also open the way for other property owners to reasonably expect similar requests in zoning changes. 7. Multi-family development will increase the noise pollution in the area. 8; This zoning change would reduce the marketability of single-, family residences in the immediate area. The general result of this zoning change would be to significantly reduce the quality of life now existing in the neighborhood. For this reason the majority of property owners in the neighborhood strongly oppose this request for rezoning. Name (please print) Signature Address 1. tivin,v Ya 14 s/co ie" x J— rc?i7— /7E' ,'e 2.- fY( r c.__ rA c r f' e_c l 1 1,._,-& A .-.%- I/3 (' n=- 71€` /(( Lxit / / 1 . 3. ---t , ,L s a r 5t,(; o`c° 7 .nJ </3 Y] . F. /' T 3 ti 4 ,4 4 fut=1V4 WO tetu ---ter 216 /v /l'"4 5.7i/r 0r, i. e ,7„.,, _':-°lifl/ G Y? `i7G 9,2dd ir/r / 1 P1. 6. 8 ekt ea/V 5' IP Id p2- zei 7. 00.--v \ CQ Aa C' .r‘ :t.r,C,Q.,A i:e) ne. 041 Pi-- 8. fV L c f NI. Fo r,cl-- Jii1 ' 0 ME. I Z`- i= P c.c., 9. A ri.- Lev, , ' 2 / 7 .. W ‹; /j l. 1,.t fr.- 10. Laotiai-ci' Ada,. 4.1t-ki. (-14.- Lf/C 5 &le ri I!7 y . 11"Aide:, /4cLe 4 121/7 t f- k ibue Ale // r i 4 t 12: j e_ /g N A ii (riar A/ e S i liA i., `71/6 3 /y/C // .5,7 v - MAY 1, 1977 WE, the undersigned residents of Renton, Washington, have studied and are familiar with the proposed Rezone request known as the Donald L. Luedke Rezone Request from G-7200 to R-2, File No. R-041-77, located at 3916 - N. E. 12th St. , Renton, Washington. We object to the granting of this Rezone request for the following reasons: 1. The above rezoning request does not comply with the Renton Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, Revised August, 1976. 2. Granting of the rezone request would increase the traffic problem which already exists on N. E. 12th Street and would further jeopardize the safety of children walking to school. 3. The increase in population would increase the overcrowding in the schools. 4. Existing sewers are not designed for multi-family use. 5. The effect of 'this rezoning would increase the existing imbalance of multi-family dwellings in the affected area. 6. The rezoning would create a spot zone of R-2 zoning within the existing single-family residential zone. This would also open the way for other property owners to reasonably expect similar requests in zoning changes. 7. Multi-family development will increase the noise pollution in the area. • 8. This zoning change would reduce the marketability of single- family residences in the immediate area. The general result of this zoning change would be to significantly reduce the quality of life now existing in the neighborhood. For this reason the majority of property owners in the neighborhood strongly oppose this request for rezoning. Name (please print) Signature Address 014‘11 , 1 a2 ice 3./' b9R air? A3 ACX'o, Jcke.- 4• 9h6Z l LiC o 2 E- /1 lire --•- / 4 41,4-&-rt L4.25 Gi!/ AD AC,CA' ,6• `C-61-c'A.-4-4 1 , I 1 L JC e C; I.c.Mil 9 11.c'11 /17 lV I a i.7. A r L r ,J l nA. l-l/c JS l bt u 4-33 D-71- f t ft- r •- s Ypl y f i y33d 4'66 9. ': 1)Utiut.A4 { l/), it.; Z' !41 0. C` LJ - 4'% 1i<i (.: J . I, a zoL.ft ka,008 klel 64-11 os Kr_ 11. 7 2y, r + j A Sr.-f 9. )1/71—e 3 2 4 c' -1-e--1'-2.2 2c 12./// r In o [ A—r;/GI,c f's !7 Gir /.-/ X-e• ,fr. L/3 2 i A/e /o ` A /1(_ MAY 1, 1977 WE, the undersigned residents of Renton, Washington, have studied and are familiar with the proposed Rezone request known as the Donald L. Luedke Rezone Request from G-7200 to R-2, File No. R-041-77, located at 3916 - N. E. 12th St. , Renton, Washington. We object to. the granting of this Rezone request for the following reasons: 1. The above rezoning request does not comply with the Renton Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, Revised August, 1976. 2. Granting of the rezone request would increase the traffic problem which already exists on N. E. 12th Street and would further jeopardize the safety of children walking to school. 3. The increase in population would increase the overcrowding in the schools. 4. Existing sewers are not designed for multi-family use. 5. The effect of this rezoning would increase the existing imbalance of multi-family dwellings in the affected area. 6. The rezoning would create a spot zone of R-2 zoning within the existing single-family residential zone. This would also open the way for other property owners to reasonably expect similar requests in zoning changes. 7. Multi-family development will increase the noise pollution in the area, 8, This zoning change would reduce the marketability of single- family residences in the immediate area. The general result of this zoning change would be to significantly reduce the quality of life now existing in the neighborhood. For this reason the majority of property owners in the neighborhood strongly oppose this request for rezoning. Name (please print) Signature Address 1 4 \--L P3„, CA/41. I IA-. ‘eiNbv‘,TD l/Pall/e- C. Mesa (. o f&I ,,., 71 L ' 4 5 %-CD/2JoNIJ ' /V• 6 1 4. ...c D lS Yd,.14 Ik,C l 5. C1 4/ j) v2F)..36?1 0zIfor 7. RAUGENI TO N*Q- 1-- -see o V•cJ7. 8. \A 2 cr_n( 1-i o I r o4 u.,1 `- lrC c/ Hi PE YYI c 9. /1. cali P A Shh,,3?" A./: //;4-5/ I 10. g 6,2171„,,,o/AvA• /11,0 I ' il. • , 4,0-tiza 11vkeint-A4c4(110-P )(2-i, J / 12 OS Xpiøi MAY 1, 1977 WE, the undersigned residents of Renton, Washington, have studied and are familiar with the proposed Rezone request known as the Donald L. Luedke Rezone Request from G-7200 to R-2, File No. R-041-77, located at 3916 - N. E. 12th St. , Renton, Washington. We object to the granting of this Rezone request for the following reasons: 1. The above rezoning request does not comply with the Renton Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, Revised August, 1976. 2. Granting of the rezone request would increase the traffic problem which already exists on N. E. 12th Street and would further jeopardize the safety of children walking to school. 3. The increase in population would increase the overcrowding in the schools. 4. Existing sewers are not designed for multi-family use. 5. The effect of this rezoning would increase the existing imbalance of multi-family dwellings in the affected area. 6. The rezoning would create a spot zone of R-2 zoning within the existing single-family residential zone. This would also open the way for other property owners to reasonably expect similar requests in zoning changes. 7. Multi-family development will increase the noise pollution in the area. 8. This zoning change would reduce the marketability of single- family residences in the immediate area. The general result of this zoning change would be to significantly reduce the quality of life now existing in the neighborhood. For this reason the majority of property owners in the neighborhood strongly oppose this request for rezoning. Name (please print) Signature Address 1. MR s W.t4• MA 1).4 Y4 •7i•Z1'l Y7Z7 C.,t4•L`.P--"4 2. /(LL C` S}.Q/.t%'C//rho 3. S/9/hh ("RUM' S 7)--k. 3 7e `/ 't/i{ // (_f(i 4. 774/ :ram) 1F6/r- /777 . .: 7i%c' '7 /Uc //a`( 5.&I Wn uQ Jz6 r rv 3 9o5 /y•F• 6. Iv g 3 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. MAY 1, 1977 WE, the undersigned residents of Renton, Washington, have studied and are familiar with the proposed Rezone request known as the Donald L. Luedke Rezone . Request from G-7200 to R-2, File No. R-041-77, located at 3916 - N. E. 12th St. , Renton, Washington. We object to . the granting of this Rezone request for the following reasons: 1. The above rezoning request does not comply with the Renton Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, Revised August, 1976. 2. Granting of the rezone request would increase the traffic problem which already exists on N. E. 12th Street and would further jeopardize the safety of children walking to school; 3. The increa\se in population would increase the overcrowding in the schools. 4. Existing sewers are not designed for multi-family use. 5. The effect of this rezoning would increase the existing imbalance of multi-family dwellings in the affected area. 6. The rezoning would create a spot zone of R-2 zoning within the existing single-family residential zone. This would also open the way for other property owners to reasonably expect similar requests in zoning changes. 7. Multi-family development will increase the noise pollution in the area. 8. This zoning change would reduce the marketability of single- family residences in the immediate area. The general result of this zoning change would be to significantly reduce the quality of life now existing in the neighborhood. For this reason the majority of property owners in the neighborhood strongly oppose this request for rezoning. Name (please print) Signature Address 1 i.G,01_,.P A/x asiit-e.,rX4. c /e) /AS/ o,""),r,9h < er: 2. C Lai u 0 e-'' ,9'H / 1( r (-A,I.! A,,/ // 5-/ 00 ;,,_, 3.,/t'1 41{ / J 1/r.',c'.c// iii%',rc-;/lr t T ,/' .- 4dieeilir A4' /' 4\.. "G, , .-0 0 . ^ 110 T\cm 1 Is cam,A Y'1 n 5:(i r'1 .U/OnR, ri,_1 /-r_ if 'i 9 C 1 R( . /UF_ 6. P?Y 7)..2N b 4V 1(47 7. de2"- :,/SCJira,dr -c./ I 0 I-1W "71. g/2.0N- //, Z 8./ [ ('l , '/ -P o S H I R L Ey -t Vu F,0 ne T Fi ///S dim 9 Ote-e-Klidz-p2d-- 072 y r W ,u 1 o 2 F 10. A 14,E Cam- . s7"t42vAJ C C C h.r a ... ! cfS / CA...LA r 11. 12. MAY 1, 1977 WE, the undersigned residents of Renton, Washington, have studied and are familiar with the proposed Rezone request known as the Donald L. Luedke Rezone Request from G-7200 to R-2, File No. R-041-77, located at 3916 - N. E. 12th St. , Renton, Washington. We object to the granting of this Rezone request for the following reasons: 1. The above rezoning request does not comply with the Renton Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, Revised August, ' 1976. . 2. Granting of the rezone request would increase the traffic problem which already exists on N. E, 12th Street and would further jeopardize the safety of children walking to school. 3. The increase in population would increase the overcrowding in the schools. 4. Existing sewers are not designed for multi-family use, 5. ' The effect of this rezoning would increase the existing imbalance of multi-family dwellings in the affected area, 6, The rezoning would create a spot zone of R-2 zoning within the existing single-family residential zone, This would also open the way for other property owners to reasonably expect similar requests in zoning changes. 7. Multi-family development will increase the noise pollution in the area. 8. This zoning change would reduce the marketability of single- family residences in the immediate area. The general result of this zoning change would be to significantly reduce the quality of life now existing in the neighborhood. For this reason the majority of property owners in the neighborhood strongly oppose this request for rezoning. Name (please print) Signature Address 1. F_NIP•cf 511211(4174rrt, i k1E lir" (,,t14- p. e_is al-, 400 72? „ 74--74,-, 39c‘ 41( - A 3. F_efPr;krc\ d^ilk.EtA-i,nc ertpn rqNrc{) 4.R, L"V'GE S lrn a Vd ? 4( / C! Joyce isoSsm h v jo7 'J• G.// ' • 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. MAY 1, 1977 WE, the undersigned residents of Renton, Washington, have studied and are familiar with the proposed Rezone request known as the Donald L. Luedke Rezone Request from G-7200 to R-2, File No. R-041-77, located at 3916 - N. E. 12th St. , Renton, Washington. We object to the granting of this Rezone request for the following reasons: 1. The above rezoning request does not comply with the Renton Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, Revised August, 1976. 2. Granting of the rezone request would increase the traffic problem which already exists on N. E. 12th Street and would further jeopardize the safety of children walking to school. 3. The increase in population would increase the overcrowding in the schools. 4. Existing sewers are not designed for multi-family use. 5. The effect of this rezoning would increase the existing imbalance of multi-family dwellings in the affected area. 6. The rezoning would create a spot zone of R-2 zoning within the existing single-family residential zone. This would also open the way for other property owners to reasonably expect similar requests in zoning changes. 7. Multi-family development will increase the noise pollution in the area'. . 8. This zoning change would reduce the marketability of single- family residences in the immediate area. The general result of this zoning change would be to significantly reduce the quality of life now existing in the neighborhood. For this reason the majority of property owners in the neighborhood strongly oppose this request for rezoning. Name (please print) Signature Address 1. F:i'.¢nJk R /. 431ES 9 1 Jo26 S1/ .L7 .) .4i" 4 .E, 2. /-49e/e/ET A Ac/9i 's / Pam' ,q f lLte A0.2 6 .S.y6cra v ..C .U.E. 3'/5l r'r r i ,C L')i/ - /i;j. i,/ . ,.,.4 / 4 ,ei-f,9",/ 'f/ 1 4. Tea,M2 4- L GLi/e zJ' -J.,1.5 ,S/ierg, /7„ P/y, u 5. fHW / ,C, /yUR,p I-1 0 1 ' )74,574 O 5"3 S/ieL1-19.) li/-e, it)E- 6.fe6AireS rh y' lrirph ,/i,i,G,114.—f cit I 1O53" S)-,eLfvn/ 4I/E N.F 7. . . f // 5 . -/14fie,e C fit..1 ,f4 f'/ < ,../,. i U 6i —c .9. t-K /liiP4/F 077 io• Der ge7 ...7 41- I /-24-- ,i/ e) 2.,1.7„ ._„,„, s---) ,.,_...,a-- /0 501;imIte).-7 /441_,,...€49 11. sue.N nJ k IA 1 dn1/SoAl rya,. a), ; - c q s#Ftrat) /AYE A). . 12. 1l-2Itj . 1 . / '1 n Vv n Snr,ram/ 0 6-)c i /a/ 9 -- e...1 gc,,e "it r i i_.. MAY 1, 1977 WE, the undersigned residents of Renton, Washington, have studied and are familiar with the proposed Rezone request known as the Donald L. Luedke Rezone Request from G-7200 to R-2, File No. R-041-77, located at 3916 - N. E. 12th St. , Renton, Washington. We object to the granting of this Rezone request for the following reasons: 1.: The above rezoning request does not comply with the Renton Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, Revised August, 1976. 2., Granting of the rezone request would increase the traffic problem which already exists on N. E. 12th Street and would further jeopardize the safety of children walking to school. 3. The increase in population would increase the overcrowding in the schools. 4. Existing sewers are not designed for multi-family use. 5.; The effect of this rezoning would increase the existing imbalance of multi-family dwellings in the affected area. 6.; The rezoning would create a spot zone of R-2 zoning within the existing single-family residential zone. This would also open the way for other property- owners -to reasonably expect similar requests in zoning .changes. 7. Multi-family development will increase the noise pollution in the area. • 8. This zoning change would reduce the marketability of single- family residences in the immediate area. The general result of this zoning change would be to significantly reduce the quality of life now existing in the neighborhood. For this reason the majority of property owners in the neighborhood strongly oppose this request for rezoning. Name (please print) Signature Address Ara S . Ito A/g, r am, f 74-71e/c/ 71-Zejl/ ?M/ Af/A /a7-A- R.,:aff,, 3. f-1 Act A011 0 X72.(rxli_E-77E c 6,4_,4,wwti,7 /C47 (W r,r,4{l//Gx'7d54. .1f (UII;a/: 1 rZoW jYJãT1.Jt 0 P '633 /lf O• aka n 4-Joe • Vim!/- AT 6. K c,a-j Fes- ;6%.tAzL o„ . 3 7/6 E io7.11e4./70-1, T 7. 4 k C `-c L& l MQ r 8•_/7/A /K /./ R0 L D 7e11 320 l /11_ ./n TYv d 7 *0f.-.07-r.J, r 4- t4 'Pai ,,,jgefe oe- r 10. ' Ll,' ;.`. Jr,L, jai _f/l i a n 7.x % . Y7j. 14 - M T .N ed M o n/d P M E- /o 7 12. 9 fs 4- fj Cf Po yNn1 11N Al 1'"l'/wD (1 ` uv l i 1018 .PLvnep C 22,Cy IS / Y AZ46 102/ z 14/ifig40 dE3" - /I / -4,2I2.5 t 7 ' f , v lU J-0 g. Treii e Pir rs m.?c ..o 7ve ,vL' /D MAY 1, 1977 WE, the undersigned residents of Renton, Washington, have studied and are familiar with the proposed Rezone request known as the Donald L. Luedke Rezone Request from G-7200 to R-2, File No. R-041-77, located at 3916 - N. E. 12th St.., Renton, Washington. We object to the granting of this Rezone request for the following reasons: 1. The above rezoning request does not comply with the Renton Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, Revised August, 1976. 2. Granting of the rezone request would increase the traffic problem which already exists on N. E. 12th Street and would further jeopardize the safety of children walking to school. 3. The increase in population would increase the overcrowding in the schools. 4. Existing sewers are not designed for multi-family use. 5. The effect of this rezoning would increase the existing imbalance of multi-family dwellings in the affected area. 6. The rezoning would create a spot zone of R-2 zoning within the existing single-family residential zone. This would also open the way for other property owners to reasonably expect similar requests in zoning changes. 7. Multi-family development will increase the noise pollution in the area. 8. This zoning change would reduce the marketability of single- family residences in the immediate area. The general result of this zoning change would be to significantly reduce the quality of life now existing in the neighborhood. For this reason the majority of property owners in the neighborhood strongly oppose this request for rezoning. Name (please print) Signature Address 1. (4 1e ' , D A 3(7/ AZ & EL . h rrt 13 Z 1 1)-"' fi L 3.,fc,>' IV{/1/1•,i/r C, i EO 57 . rZl Aci 4.• G ,1 A S Nl riceP_ 5. Uua.,o biasTeborci IU - (I m ip VeNr,- 1ent-on 6. 1,- 1/ ‘.W/ AT. ii--ilgaet,goz`b 7. iol/ 3(Id 74E //4gfren 8.11.5°M,A4 M.L R<hft LisPO 3 r`a7,4- l/2/L 9. fe,4 P Fi- hur 4,t 116o a*,),0_4; 10.1)v l C w., I . cr ;v1-- OiticL1 t 6.r.q)F. et-z47, 11. 12.. MAY 1, 1977 WE, the undersigned residents of Renton, Washington, have studied and are familiar with the proposed Rezone request known as the Donald L. Luedke Rezone Request from G-7200 to R-2, File No. R-041-77, located at 3916 - N. E. 12th St. , Renton, Washington. We object to the granting of this Rezone request for the following reasons: 1. The above rezoning request does not comply with the Renton. Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, Revised August, 1976. 2. Granting of the rezone request would increase the traffic problem which already exists on N. E. 12th Street and would further jeopardize the safety of children walking to school. 3. The increase in population would increase the overcrowding in the schools. 4. Existing sewers are not designed for multi-family use. 5. The effect of this rezoning would increase the existing imbalance of multi-family dwellings in the affected area. 6. The rezoning would create a spot zone of R-2 zoning within the existing single-family residential zone. This would also open the way for other property owners to reasonably expect similar requests in zoning changes. 7. Multi-family development will increase the noise pollution in the area. 8. This zoning change would reduce the. marketability of single- family residences in the immediate area. The general result of this zoning change would be to significantly reduce the quality of life now existing in the neighborhood. For this reason the majority of property owners in the neighborhood strongly oppose this request for rezoning. Name (please print) Signature Address 1. Wi L 4/4/1..4. T4 G so// I., G! i i 3 o .f'-"Ae ".e- 2. /'/,'9R UE. /9; fkk- r 36-o/ /7 // 3. #4/U4`4 e,vl-'GirF a,-//1,/,,,._,„_ e‘ „ . Y3. c , tom' f r r 0-z P 4. 0 /1 / C' (J / L/ , .R J:4e_e C - -: . , 4,_., ( 4/ . / 7 A/L__ 7,9;7( T, t 5y 4 Q) E, , f/ -4/4h 5i J ,$ ,-,)4 iiiLr i - CAD2/1%/D 7/ //5 pie ree. live YE' 6. 70 NA c ,4 C O V V ` C L c 7. hr.q 4 WE ie/1 W2,9- 1.0%/. is,,, )7 // 1 8. ok C_v ` t.5"\or` 4 vs R;,Eccc Xue NE 9. (gRp! ' A/i4145!D (4A4.42i t, !,I J 1. .r.,-c. c,,., 10./dL 2 i,,r-Eifee/6-*/` fl 4 7 di, ii. c, (,L 'mil , GL1lC 11 ( 3,( f P,t• t 12. Cie i\c\ VO'chJ\ IDS?n I(1D)e :1 I> a UE MAY 1, 1977 WE, the undersigned residents of Renton, Washington, have studied and are familiar with the proposed Rezone request known as the Donald L. Luedke Rezone Request from G-7200 to R-2, File No. R-041-77, located at 3916 - N. E. 12th St. , Renton, Washington. We object to the granting of- this Rezone request for the following reasons: 1. The above rezoning request does not comply with the Renton Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, Revised August, 1976. 2. Granting of the rezone request would increase the traffic problem which already exists on N. E. 12th Street and would further jeopardize the safety of children walking to school. 3. The increase in population would increase the overcrowding in the schools. 4. Existing sewers are not designed for multi-family use. 5. The effect of this rezoning would, increase the existing imbalance of multi-family dwellings in the affected area. 6. The rezoning would create a spot zone of R-2 zoning within the existing single-family residential zone. This would also open the way for other property owners to reasonably expect similar requests in zoning changes. 7. Multi-family development will increase the noise pollution in the area. 8. This zoning change would reduce the marketability of single- family residences in the immediate area. The general result of this zoning change would be to significantly reduce the quality of life now existing in the neighborhood. For this reason the majority of property owners in the neighborhood strongly oppose this request for rezoning. kjq cr- iame. (please print) Signature Address 1 -r; l II ` c.p nk9 S-1e 33-3 Z //_ /Y s — 3. %x*4 ;n. \ )f e Qc„ 4_1 W 9 A ,A)Shy IJ E / tile oIT'P. / e / 9/yes 77 4 s/ p ' X6. ci- o h'wA-iFTr/to&sue-4 --4'. ij pt. 7 - A 8.CoTH .6. T-o xJ l 2 A3° i he j9. Q42141,197,Aeit/ 4211 owe_, to' f sh/4 l 3b 1 t9- ii.Pv •e( ,e 1•\ % 574 eg- dl L-71:1 vs /-k VA-. AA.A.1 -fit freis 2/5 Aii.et A N,f. 12.1zk/il,e1 A 11/ G- S G 1204 7 iE)wr f,C A•i (i h, 2• rn ii 7 Zd ,re MAY 1, 1977 WE, the undersigned residents of Renton, Washington, have studied and are familiar with the proposed Rezone request known as the Donald L. Luedke Rezone Request from G-7200 to R-2, File No. R-041-77, located at 3916 - N. E. 12th St. , Renton, Washington. We object to the granting of this Rezone request for the following reasons: 1. The above rezoning request does not comply with the Renton Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, Revised August, 1976. 2. Granting of the rezone request would increase the traffic problem which already exists on N. E. 12th Street and would further jeopardize the safety of children walking to school. 3. The increase in population would increase the overcrowding in the schools. 4. Existing sewers are not designed for multi-family use. 5. The effect of this rezoning would increase the existing imbalance of multi-family dwellings in the affected area. 6. The rezoning would create a spot zone of R-2 zoning within the existing single-family residential zone. This would also open the way for other property owners to reasonably expect similar requests in zoning changes. 7. Multi-family development will increase the noise pollution in the area. 8. This zoning change would reduce the marketability of single- family residences in the 'immediate area. The general result of this zoning change would be to significantly reduce the quality of life now existing in the neighborhood. For this reason the majority of property owners in the neighborhood strongly oppose this request for rezoning. r64"1- Name (please print) Signature Address X1. ' "'f ., l P c , e_r :t.‘T ._ r ter- . t O/ C a Pam, 2. (r) Q. 1 o. A _ l.3 X. 3. 5 HA em/ L 064...AIL/E oma / if/ 4 4. //e%% / g/7 P t9Y .e a, $7 K 5 aiM cbcYam' `lf fa 1 6-9P A _/)11 f g- 6. J.7•U-7' TH/Et13Ale 6g a 0 r Q Vie, it 4 SC 8. Ro ,d A ci , cc 4 2 .,:u J3 e&& '-'- ie,Z 9. 7 /ic P/fsoIse / 1 c e444ex.a 2.. PI A 10,-- xe%c,y E'. k 11, •JJ, ir Sd -E 3 110 '2 $ 7 12. X , o,Cva f..(2 i" MAY 1, 1977 WE, the undersigned residents of Renton, Washington, have studied and are familiar with the proposed Rezone request known as the Donald L. Luedke Rezone Request from G-7200 to R-2, File No. R-041-77, located at 3916 - N. E. 12th St. , Renton, Washington. We object to the granting of this Rezone request for the following reasons: 1. The above rezoning request does not comply with the Renton Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, Revised August, 1976. 2. Granting of the rezone request would increase the traffic problem which already exists on N. E. 12th Street and would further jeopardize the safety of children walking to school• 3. The increase in population would increase the overcrowding in the ,schools. 4. Existing sewers are not designed for multi-family use. 5. The effect of this rezoning would increase the existing imbalance of multi-family dwellings in the affected area. 6. The rezoning would create a spot zone of R-2 zoning within the existing single-family residential zone. This would also open the way for other property owners to reasonably expect similar requests in zoning changes. 7. Multi-family development will increase the noise pollution in the area. 8. This zoning change would reduce the marketability of single- family residences in the immediate area. The general result of this zoning change would be to significantly reduce the quality of life now existing in the neighborhood. For this reason the majority of property owners in the neighborhood strongly oppose this request for rezoning. Name (please print) Signature Address 1. R1 ci ki L/ OO .51 cJIe y Ai&I I'll, P n 2.2)", e, 3• v v 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. AjaVVie6 MAY 1, 1977 WE, the undersigned residents of Renton, Washington, have studied and are familiar with the proposed Rezone request known as the Donald L. Luedke Rezone Request from G-7200 to R-2, File No. R-041-77, located at 3916 - N. E. 12th St. , Renton, Washington. We object to the granting of this Rezone request for the following reasons: 1. The above rezoning request does not comply with the Renton Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, Revised August, 1976. 2. Granting of the rezone request would increase the traffic problem which already exists on N. E. 12th Street and would further jeopardize the safety of children walking to school. 3. The increase in population would increase the overcrowding in the schools. 4. Existing sewers are not designed for multi-family use. 5. The effect of this rezoning would increase the existing imbalance of multi-family dwellings in the affected area. 6. The rezoning would create a spot zone of R-2 zoning within the existing single-family residential zone. This would also open the way for other property owners to reasonably expect similar requests in zoning changes. 7. Multi-fan}ily development will increase the noise pollution in the area. 8. This zoning change would reduce the marketability of single- family residences in the immediate area. The general result of this zoning change would be to significantly reduce the quality of life now existing in the neighborhood. For this reason the majority of property owners in the neighborhood strongly oppose this request for rezoning. Name (please print) Signature Address fp+ /1. 3 /" 7//: r ..I/ j/ l A (/;.' 4. Cancla c.e,_ K. ()de, aai-'cJ Aijeep 1/ RI/1 T H T H L - L //%-4 h iTs D YJoN D 1l d!;, 11"L 6. .)a A es 7 CA kci n 12_ L /Aee- jrO, 7./ ff 6-(rt E. l 7C7/Y y/S(' 21-d T? ///6ifiklA c›^ 4/// /1/. 8 9. 10. 11. 12. MAY 1, 1977 WE, the undersigned residents of Renton, Washington, have studied and are familiar with the proposed Rezone request known as the Donald L. Luedke Rezone Request from G-7200 to R-2, File No. R-041-77, located at 3916 - N. E. 12th St. , Renton, Washington. We object to the granting of this Rezone request for the following reasons: 1. The above rezoning request does not comply with the Renton Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, Revised August, 1976. 2. Granting of the rezone request would increase the traffic problem which already exists on N. E. 12th Street and would further jeopardize the safety of children walking to school. 3. The increase in population would increase the overcrowding in the schools. 4. Existing sewers are not designed for multi-family use. 5. The effect of this rezoning would increase the existing imbalance of multi-family dwellings in the affected area. 6. The rezoning would create a spot zone of R-2 zoning within the existing single-family residential zone. This would also open the way for other property owners to reasonably expect similar requests in zoning changes. 7. Multi-family development will increase the noise pollution in the area. 8. This zoning change would reduce the marketability of single- family residences in the immediate area. The general result of this zoning change would be to significantly reduce the quality of life now existing in the neighborhood. For this reason the majority of property owners in the neighborhood strongly oppose this request for rezoning. Name (please print) Signature Address r 1, ( 1• 1 ll!1( r f'/// (, f, J/t1\i j. (177//1,71,'7l6/(7/(1:.,1 i / 1/{.:' l r 11 ! r, '1/ r t f / ! 3: 7174s./1),--. ,;'f. ()PI I'l!1r. 7)/`-( '.-,,.r9)-i ,fr,/ :::,J„ r rf k r i ` 1. 4• ,i:,.' 1 i 1''/i.{'J .. .%- /" C ) i3- .< f l; J i : .rr s ;/ / f1t 5 j-''•C ,C . 7:),-t.t,. 6. 11.f.L f11i, 6. 7. 8. 9• 10. 11'. 12. MAY 1, 1977 WE, the undersigned residents of Renton, Washington, have studied and are familiar with the proposed Rezone request known as the Donald L. Luedke Rezone Request from G-7200 to R-2, File No. R-041-77, located at 3916 - N. E. 12th St. , Renton, Washington. We object to the granting of this Rezone request for the following reasons: 1. The above rezoning request does not comply with the Renton Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, Revised August, 1976. 2. Granting of the rezone request would increase the traffic problem which already exists on N. E. 12th Street and would further jeopardize the safety of children walking to school. 3. The increase in population would increase the overcrowding in the schools. 4. Existing sewers are not designed for multi-family use. 5. The effect of this rezoning would increase the existing imbalance of multi-family dwellings in the affected area. 6. The rezoning would create a spot zone of R-2 zoning within the existing single-family residential zone. This would also open the way for other property owners to reasonably expect similar requests in zoning changes. 7. Multi-family development will increase the noise pollution in the area. 8. This zoning change would reduce the marketability of single- family residences in the immediate area. The general result of this zoning change would be to significantly reduce the quality of life now existing in the neighborhood. For this reason the majority of property owners in the neighborhood strongly oppose this request for rezoning. Name (please print) Signature Address y„ 1. C> a r-y G d e d et- 7 0 c 5,<< //G 2. 5 l-P L?._ /t/ 2. n r' < I. tC\/ 1 1`r. .l i ht_.t'k Y JA ///, .} ."1 e t<\,k 1'W. A% 3 . , I-1 ) l` ' /'1 r1, r / 1 d ;'• i" .t' ' - } (4'/;J :1..Its'.!_ °, (%.• .' . 5. ` 47. /i:/ii i=1/11i 2., if /.%-G,-.---r V cf/ ./%,i. /4' l•:• 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. MAY 1, 1977 WE, the undersigned residents of Renton, Washington, have studied and are familiar with the proposed Rezone request known as the Donald L. Luedke Rezone Request from G-7200 to R-2, File No. R-041-77, located at 3916 - N. E. 12th St. , Renton, Washington. We object to the granting of this Rezone request for the following reasons: 1. The above rezoning request does not comply with the Renton Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, Revised August, 1976. 2 . Granting of the rezone request would increase the traffic problem which already exists on N. E. 12th Street and would further jeopardize the safety of children walking to school. 3. The increase in population would increase the overcrowding in the schools. 4. Existing sewers are not designed for multi-family use. 5. The effect of this rezoning would increase the existing imbalance of multi-family dwellings in the affected area. 6. The rezoning would create a spot zone of R-2 zoning within the existing single-family residential zone. This would also open the way for other property owners to reasonably expect similar requests in zoning changes. 7. Multi-family development will increase the noise pollution in the area. 8. This zoning change would reduce the marketability of single- family residences in the immediate area. The general result of this zoning change would be to significantly reduce the quality of life now existing in the neighborhood. For this reason the majority of property owners in the neighborhood strongly oppose this request for rezoning. Name (please print) Signature Address 1. Yoh e e.1 \\N .\\`ow o- 1\_ti\x• ` ) 1= \\V c L 2 . < <dti 1 , 1 , F{ at 4, p /7 it- vcc i/ /tic/ 1v 3./V.(-" • G C'e z X)/ g" (61- V// ( y1 4. 4 G l 4 4 5 . ,lMrv/c Ah. /7 'i s u 7)I a.frc•r 79 a AA!. if/ I G1v6. ( n c Z. I 4VI•!•. 1 e 3 9 c7.1 ALA. 1/ v e 7 7• r K;2S' !C C,l'."I o 1 SE cJ Le V rt L n / -,(/ / rG --' 9. 10. 11. 12. MAY 1, 1977 WE, the undersigned residents of Renton, Washington, have studied and are familiar with the proposed Rezone request known as the Donald L. Luedke Rezone Request from G-7200 to R-2, File No. R-041-77, located at 3916 - N. E. 12th St, , Renton, Washington. We object to the granting of this Rezone request for the following reasons: 1. The above rezoning request does not comply with the Renton Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, Revised August, 1976. 2. Granting of the rezone request would increase the traffic problem which already exists on N. E. 12th Street and would further jeopardize the safety of children walking to school. 3. The increase in population would increase the overcrowding in the schools. 4. Existing sewers are not designed for multi-family use. 5. The effect of this rezoning would increase the existing imbalance of multi-family dwellings in the affected area. 6. The rezoning would create a spot zone of R-2 zoning within the existing single-family residential zone. This would also open the way for other property owners to reasonably expect similar requests in zoning changes. 7. Multi-family development will increase the noise pollution in the area. 8. This zoning change would reduce the marketability of single- family residences in the immediate area. The general result of this zoning change would be to significantly reduce the quality of life now existing in the neighborhood. For this reason the majority of property owners in the neighborhood strongly oppose this request for rezoning. Name (please print) Signature Address fitr ;i,r; I Oy;i-11 !; Y i [NNN l II .K.-11 7r 14 J l(:-- 1/ 110U/( 1 110 4 top/1 Yl l) t lI : 11L1 t /.(; /1014 ley / 'I I V _ r _ x \- /c' f\ At(c_ 1 . e„ S 0 'lei AJ 3tiT)4.1/M/E:-5 GAA/cw:- f J/ i 2 ) 01,eee Al C (17 roAl i5.c.r;n c c rl !l, L + -'J- 1( _-- ,r . , c j/t-> :Si')` ( '-o) d' 6.I 7. 8. 9 10. 11. 12. MAY 1, 1977 WE, the undersigned residents of Renton, Washington, have studied and are familiar with the proposed Rezone request known as the Donald L. Luedke Rezone Request from G-7200 to R-2, File No. R-041-77, located at 3916 - N. E. 12th St. , Renton, Washington. We object to the granting of this Rezone request for the following reasons: 1. The above rezoning request does not comply with the Renton Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, Revised August, 1976. 2. Granting of the rezone request would increase the traffic problem which already exists on N. E. 12th Street and would further jeopardize the safety of children walking to school. 3. The increase in population would increase the overcrowding in the schools. 4. Existing sewers are not designed for multi-family use. 5. The effect of this rezoning would increase the existing imbalance of multi-family dwellings in the affected area. 6. The rezoning would create a spot zone of R-2 zoning within the existing single-family residential zone. This would also open the way for other property owners to reasonably expect similar requests in zoning changes. 7. Multi-family development will increase the noise pollution in the area. 8. This zoning change would reduce the marketability of single- family residences in the immediate area. The general result of this zoning change would be to significantly reduce the quality of life now existing in the neighborhood. For this reason the majority of property owners in the neighborhood strongly oppose this request- for rezoning. Name lease print) Signature Address r 1. I &, L.L_IS v Jt. J 15 c 0 7( 2. Jar t A „AlE_l..s 71 3 S(5 A(.4 , tz s, 3 1..At A/1U.,'/ 09 4. I Aler ,e 4,9iti/a l7, 5. J 6. 7. 8. 9 10. 11. 12. 1 MAY 1, 1977 WE, the undersigned residents of Renton, Washington, have studied and are familiar with the proposed Rezone request known as the Donald L. Luedke Rezone Request from G-7200 to R-2, File No. R-041-77, located at 3916 - N. E. 12th St. , Renton, Washington, We object to the granting of this Rezone request for the following reasons: 1. The above rezoning request does not comply with the Renton Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, Revised August, 1976. 2. Granting of the rezone request would increase the traffic problem which already exists on N. E, 12th Street and would further jeopardize the safety of children walking to school. 3. The increase in population would increase the overcrowding in the schools. 4. Existing sewers are not designed for multi-family use. 5. The effect of this rezoning would increase the existing imbalance of multi ,-family dwellings in the affected area. 6. The rezoning would create a spot zone of R-2 zoning within the existing single-family residential zone. This would also open the way for other property owners to reasonably expect similar requests in zoning changes. 7. Multi-family development will increase the noise pollution in the area. 8. This zoning change would reduce the marketability of single- family residences in the immediate area, The general result of this zoning change would be to significantly reduce the quality of life now existing in the neighborhood. For this reason the majority of property owners in the neighborhood strongly oppose this request for rezoning. Name (please print) Signature Address d 1. s04/ez 5 E I7 WIC</f'6-4'10'- 21 461 ///d e xe- , ,' e. 2. Q a-- - WV" a r,„ A 3- Ch u r /Y 39jv 9 12.E- a `',H- 3 A 2, i lY..66 rs0M , -3-310/ N // r-/ YL 4. N A N; l 10 , ref4 11($1 a\J --)) ,,c.,c(0.)'),,- (k.c Pn / N. II-4, Pe' 5 0,,, f/ r G j 1 / . 6• r( F <r r74..._i ,`7 /V f 1T(-I ice.-__ 7. I 8 I 9, 10. 11. 12. 1.2 RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAY 31977 PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER ARC PM PUBLIC HEARING 718,9,19dlil2uh,213,415,6 A MAY 3, 197- EXHIBIT NO. / APPLICANT: DONALD L. LUEDKE ITEM NO. X- p '1l- 7.7 FILE NO, : R-041-77 ; REZONE REQUEST FROM G-7200 , GENERAL CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT, TO R-2 , RESIDENCE DISTRICT A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests rezone from G-7200 to R-2 to allow construction of low density multi -family dwellings in conformance with the Compre- hensive Plan for the area . B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1 . Owner of Record : DONALD L . LUEDKE 2 . Applicant : DONALD L . LUEDKE 3 . Location : 3916 N. E . 12th Street 4 . Legal Description : Detailed legal description available on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5 . Size of Property : Approximately . 9 acres . 6 . Access : Via N . E. 12th Street. 7 . Existing Zone : G-7200 . 8 . Existing Zoning G-7200 , General Classification District , in Area : Single Family Residence ; B- 1 , Business District. 9 . Comprehensive Low Density Multiple Family Residential Land Use Plan : 10. Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance . C. PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Subject rezone request to R-2 zoning is to allow future development as per R-2 standards . D. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject site was annexed to the City on April 27 , 1967 , by Ordinance No . 2323 . The G-7200 zone corresponds to the previous County zoning designation prior to annexation . E. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography : The site is relatively level with a slight rise near the middle of the property . 2 . Soils : Alderwood (AgC ) . Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil . Runoff is slow to medium, and hazard of erosion is moderate. This soil is used for timber , pasture , row crops , and urban development. 3 . Vegetation : The southerly one-third of the subject site is rela- tively clear, although there are a certain number of existing PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF MAY 3, 1977 PAGE TWO RE : DONALD L . LUEDKE REZONE REQUEST FROM G-7200 TO R-2 deciduous and evergreen trees . The remaining portion of the site is heavily wooded with many significant trees and vegetation typi - cal of Northwest woodlands . 4 . Wildlife : The existing vegetation on the site provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 5. Water: Surface water or streams are not apparent on the site . 6 . Land Use : There is an existing small single family residence with an appurtenant structure located on the southerly one-third of the subject site. There are two single family residences that are located directly east of the subject site . There are other. single family residences situated farther east toward Union Ave . N . E. The Brentwood single family residence subdivision is located south of the subject site across N. E. 12th Street . Several small dilapidated , single family residences and mobile homes are located directly west of the subject site to the powerline right-of-way . The area north of the site to Sunset Boulevard is generally heavily wooded and primarily undeveloped . F. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The area is a mixture of well -kept single family residences and small dilapidated or abandoned single family residences . It appears that the subject site is located at the juncture between the well -maintained single family area and the blighted single family area . A well estab- lished single family residence district is located across N . E. 12th Street south of the subject site. G , PUBLIC SERVICES: 1 . Water and Sewer: An 8" sewer line is located along N . E . 12th Street approximately 200 feet west of Union Avenue N. E . Also , an existing 8" sewer main is located at the corner of N . E . 11th Place and N . E . 12th Street. An 8" water main and a 12" storm sewer are located • along N . E . 12th Street. 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements . Any future development on the site will be subject to City of Renton standards . 3. Transit: Metro Route No . 42 operates along N . E . 12th Street. 4 . Schools : The site is within the Renton School District and is within one-half mile of Honeydew Elementary , one-half mile from Sierra Heights Elementary, within one mile of McKnight Middle School , and within one mile of Hazen High School . 5 . Parks : The subject site is within one-half mile of Kiwanis Park and within one-half mile of a proposed County park west of Sierra Heights Elementary School . H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE,: 1 . 4-725 , Amendments . 2 . 4-729 , G , General Classification District. 3. 4-708 , R-2, Residence District. I . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS : 1 . Land Use Report , 1965 , page 17 , Objectives , numbers 1 , 2 , 4 , and 6 . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF MAY 3 , 1977 PAGE THREE RE : DONALD L . LUEDKE REZONE REQUEST FROM G-7200 TO R-2 2 . Policy Statement, Comprehensive Plan , Renton Urban Area , 1965 , page 4 , item 1 , The Neighborhood. J . IMPACTS ON NATURAL SYSTEMS: Rezoning of the subject property will not have a direct impact on the natural systems . However, eventual development of the site will dis- turb soil and vegetation , increase storm water runoff, and have an effect on traffic and noise levels in the area . K. SOCIAL IMPACTS: The subject request may result in a gradual upgrading of the existing . blighted area , thereby creating positive social benefit. However, increased density on the subject site may cause additional social interaction with surrounding properties . L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended ( RCW 43 . 216) , a Declara- tion of Non-significance has been issued for the subject proposal see attached ) . This is based upon proper development procedures and retention of as much of the natural character of the site within the ultimate development plan . M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: A vicinity map and site map are attached . N. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 . City of Renton Building Division 2. City of Renton Engineering Division 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 4 . City of Renton Utilities Division 5 . City of Renton Fire Department The above departments approved the applications . Copies of memos from certain departments are attached . O. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1 , The request is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation of low density multiple family for the site and general area north of N . E . 12th Street and south of Sunset Boule- vard . 2 . The subject site is situated between several substantial well -kept single family residences to the east and several residential struc- tures and mobile homes in rather poor condition to the west . This creates a difficult land use question , between creating a spot zone of R-2 within the existing single family residential zone and the possibility of stimulating the upgrading of not only the subject site but also the unsightly area west to the powerline right-of-way. It is the latter of these two questions that appears to be the more reasonable and appropriate for the subject site and area . 3. The R-2 zoning would allow either the subdivision of the subject property into 7200 square foot minimum lots for approximately two to three duplex residential structures or by special use per- mit approximately eight to ten townhouse type dwelling units . 4 . The site has an abundance of natural amenities including interest- ing topography , many significant trees , and much vegetation that should be incorporated into any site development plan . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF MAY 3 , 1977 PAGE FOUR RE : DONALD L . LUEDKE REZONE REQUEST FROM G-7200 TO R-2 5 . If the R-2 zoning is approved , adjacent single family residences should be protected from possible detrimental impacts through suitable setbacks , landscaping, and screening. 6 . The existing structures on the subject site may deter proper redevelopment of the site. P. PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of R-2 rezone subject to the following conditions to be filed as restrictive covenants running with the land :. 1 . EXISTING STRUCTURES The existing structures located on the subject site shall be removed from the site or remodeled to present Building Code requirements prior to commencement of any new construction . 2 . SETBACKS No building or structure shall be permitted within 30 feet of the south property line , within 30 feet of the east property line for the southerly 150 feet thereof, within 15 feet of the remaining portion along the east property line , and within 10 feet of the west property line . 3. LANDSCAPE PLANS A detailed landscape plan for the entire site development shall be submitted to and approved by the Renton Planning Department at the time of site development plan submittal . 4 . LANDSCAPE AREAS All setback areas except for ingress/egress location shall be suitably landscaped and approved by the Renton Planning Depart- ment . A suitable architectural type screening fence shall be incorporated into the landscaping along the east property line . • 5. SITE PRESERVATION Existing trees and vegetation shall be incorporated into the development plans as much as possible. Site clearing , selective tree cutting , and grading shall be permitted only in conformance with an approved site plan and specific Planning Department approval . 6 . STORM WATER RETENTION Storm drainage plans shall be submitted at the time of site development. Such plans shall include suitable on-site retention to provide for the same runoff rate for a 25-year storm period as is presently experienced on the site , together with suitable oil water separation facilities . 7 . DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31 , 2050. It is further agreed and covenanted by the undersigned that , if a development plan is not submitted to the City of Renton pur- suant to these and other City requirements within two ( 2) years , and substantial construction begun within three (3 ) years of the filing of these covenants , and said construction and development diligently prosecuted toward completion thereafter, the zoning of said property shall without further City action revert back to to the zoning which existed prior to the filing of this document , and these covenants shall become null and void . The term ."sub- stantial construction" shall mean .the physical alteration of the land for construction pursuant to City approved development plans as per the above mentioned conditions and a valid building permit , PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF MAY 3 , 1977 PAGE FIVE RE : DONALD L . LUEDKE REZONE REQUEST FROM G-7200 TO R-2 or construction of required utilities for such development. The above mentioned time periods may be extended for reasonable cause upon written request to and approval by the Renton Plan- ning Department . Such reasonable cause shall include , but may not be limited to , the requirement of an environmental impact statement pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 . The subject recommendation is consistent with the Land Use Plan , compatible with adjacent properties , and will serve to stimulate and upgrade a blighted area within the existing community. pF4 o PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION 235 -2540 a 4 J 0 LaV ' MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 0gTfD SEP April 12, 1977 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR TO: Planning Department FROM: Building Division SUBJECT: Luedke Rezone We have no objections to rezone to R-2. I Li JCH/mp l' r .ti `, rs v7 IV{3 y__ -,`s-pX^'--.'.:1"t•‘i '..A y; 11-ri:r 1 fL .1.J.`p T3 ,r l , I e-y j_ N ", 3 q ; :' 1~ al_ a .I,. .I., . ,. .1.. .e,,i I I 1/...... r[P I. u,Gf-tz- . /o-o-I.H '..-Y-- '::-------s• L'I ''- - 1 . , A ,\ L„. .__, loot, .7,,i N.a'49: 17. 45 .: I n 111 , r4l.•+u_ 5T___ ry y. 5, s4 er I - -- — I 1 1R`v1 jl I 64 e, f./, r, pp yy rt ?ix.l.x, \ \ \ 1 . [.' 11 11 1 L, •w '---M5tiliv4 ',1,,,,,','rag „i, si.i.,jI7`-e 1 L-- ! $.. s e •• _..` Il I I 2 3 4 S'c r e,o o x n I.c _ lwa RIG x 1R-3 !op i - : ;.R!!.. .2.::.:. r--1 I ', 11 1 r 0 2 .• z . s...> f , 1 1 f., 4.:_ HiH;.;:' r i' •-.. a 1 x i f , o W I t IJ / E3.1.611.14Tr--ne.:T66..7.7.=h 3 1 R 3 I ; owl at xll ppizp R .3x, f id!001Jii z .t w `, • s6 a.' 1•,•. ees=• I I, jv - Q®® _'••W • , IlL T4•'1u'Jr'1;1'''.` ` W I, .je=V p 1 =o di :' 1 Z•;4113 4 1•19,P 1 my I I', o a •4gis i O 1 s, y .N. 1 TN T. I/ IFI- x u -1 . ,•• -- i 0 ' • , L 11, F. s_i-Arci L ..1...• ...I_1 r., 1.. ' . I ,I , i.il, i',,1', r,.,,, ,,,.;,,,r sl II I h 1t 0,, 111 st rpro -.- ! 7t'.1 ,1..1,.1.i•,1'1..t'.1.• 'irt.,Ll.. • 1-i, 111L1 a 1 w I yrT' N T. i•._.•. Iz t .45 ' r am'+ _• 1 •:.L I N , .• . , • I s. r.• I••'Idn -.oil• .TM.,-,f Il- ' t 1 I o f 7r a i 4 I m1,3 as'4 R GS—iweeri.. . ; r • p" 1 REZONE: DONALD L . LUEDKE ; Appl . R-041-77 ; Rezone from G-7200 to R-2 ; property located at 3916 N. E. 12th Street. APPLICANT DONALD L . LUEDKE TOTAL AREA ± . 9 acre PRINCIPAL ACCESS Shelton Ave . and N . E . 12th St . EXISTING ZONING G-7200 EXISTING USE Single Family Residence/Undeveloped PROPOSED USE Low Density Multi -family Residential COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Low Density Multi -Family Residential COMMENTS 1 ° I ei \ 9 . ID H .., Cr-b 0 a 1 1,- - go-'.' 0 t.S. 4 El t T, . a in ' t G'ri L/M/r5 0 i -1 I I L :\L \I V . l Viso I ‘t \ ail II itle V611215 I limmpg . illale. 3 i. S.F. 37p8 y1 i% f. M MI I J4E1 4o e sip. v.E . /Zro. 5T 0 I la IQ MI 1 43 s.f as 13 n ,A. ' 07; 40,, PAsep.,, 3t 43 € ' • sil - 0 D 15. 100-:' iim VEl 31 00 w 4` ao p ®tu A p 0 fie arid 0 a a Do00aa6 ® Za 0 Na llr/r 0 9 1 544LE A.-zoo'cill po.#1,4Lb L. LLEDxe. morn: z-o+/-77 PROPOSED/FINAL --LARATION OF SIGNIFICANCEd ,. A-SIGNIFICANCE 1 ` Application No . R-041-77 0 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-239-77 El FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Applicant requests rezone from G-7200 to R-2 to allow construction of low density multi -family dwellings in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan for the area . Proponent DONALD L . LUEDKE Location of Proposal 3916 N . E. 12th Street Lead Agency Renton Planning Department This proposal has been determined to have not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS is x is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) (c ) . This decision was ma a after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final )declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official Gordon Y . Ericksen Title Planning Director Date April 26 . 1977 Signature yeli 5/V- City of Renton Planning Department CITY OF RENTON 7„ RECE I/ED REZONE APPLICATION APR 5 1977 mngommmm. For Office; Use Only: APPL. NO. I , -o 1i _ PLANNING COMMISSION ANC' DEpP 9 $5-9 FEE; RECEIPT NO. 3'76 APPEAL FILED FILING DATE CITY COUNCIL ACTION HEARING DATE ORDINANCE NO. & DATE APPLICANT 'ITO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 10 : 1. Name i Donald L. Lua dke phone 226-7108 2. Address 3915 a+ as -12 Srreet, Renton, Ilasb9nt;ton. 93W55 3. Property petitioned for rezoning is located on 3916 nert' l,t 1, ctt,„„t betwen and 4 . Square,, I footage or acreage of property ,1312 square Zoos .]13.: 25 5. Legal 'description of property (if more space is required, attach separlte sheet) The OuµLi, 335 tut ua: Lhu Wuot 112 fuut.. vf. ile Ed:,t. 617.6° feel uC Lit: Scn.fh.:rstsi. r f c t F t t . Sit zit in the City of Renton, Cew ty of King, Stata of Washington. I I 6. Existing zoning lr 72 0 U Zoning Requested NOTE TO APIPLICANT: The following factors are considered in reclass- ifying property. Evidence or additional information to substantiate your request may be attached to this sheet. (See Application Procedure sheet for specific requirements) . Submit this form in duplicate. i 7. Proposed use of site. eons:6 ;o,r /1.r.abr j , /11 i t {,,6, r-rrrc1. 'r? i.t1,7 e ` oift-7 re ii/P1cr S'r/ T /ete / DLfrC 7ace lropl1 - S ior de,iiP /Opr WRrah 1X nroS- a e-c 8 . List the measures to be taken to reduce impact on the surrounding area. 1 11 .irc.e.el al .4-1..Pc92 t31 9 . How soon after the rezone is granted do you intend to develop the site? 10. Two cpies of _plot plan and affidavit of ownership are required. Planning Dept. 2-73 AFFIDAVIT I, fnnairl r._ r,„ed1 & Suku nal being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained . and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me 4th April this xx day of mati 1977 , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at City of Renton e47- ,,p City- of Renton Name of Notary Public) Signature of Owner 3916 Northeast 12 Street, Renton Addres,$) Address) Washington Prtnn WaAhitnn City) State) 276-73C8 Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations—o the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such a p eat+pe,ji' gCEIUEo 0 Date Received ByrA f , cAPR 5 1977 o Renton Planning Dept . i5 p___E1 2-73 k_ r•-•' N/ ''-' ' I;.. rf tlemlY l!' ilv CNA 141.= IP CM C• , 11. 1 4 i i 4- fd I I SE il Z. L, I 2. h,.., 1 w I APR 5 1977 10... :, . --!:.-;-, r,,, i,.'. il, 1,,`, T. f, 1,:., E_ ! id, 1 s i. E oMI 01 g, II roll ':,.. , , - t .'". 1. ......'„ I' rp; • 1, tr. 1... ii I 4 aci, , Ap-,..---• , ,,,., .., , p, 4 7_ To; ti S+ R.— i 21, ki - . ,,., ,•,.? 5 5 1.,• , 1. 1''' 7 . 9•. i 1 1. 1r. 1 , s.. T,J, : al IC: s,%. n I 1 n : I-_____-; s 4. 4e/ 41 G G DEP N' CL i cs-....--- r\ ... ',-,;_„..... 2J 1 39 4 39 .. f_ 47e 1..'.,.:.... ma •, i!„- : Grv,' 00 1 T ,_:, ', 1------ 77 8 Az ',.. 1. a. 1 el _ p_. 11 4, .-- 1 I- • ' ' jokt vir s. 71. 1 el, en . 111 k*• f,\ ' " . co>, IL.. 4 _ ri : 1 'I 1 4 / IF' 41: 0' ( 9411r= " 1. _, _ r2...,..,„ 57 _._• N lim .., 7. 7. 7. A ,- 1, 41; 474> . I. 21,...i. c_Vij); jak , itriats, 70/. ititiy eb7 3,-. F..'- mg I_ 17 4 i i I I AD' PLAN dlir 1 i a- lid 1 \ J ! rc8 1 1 i , J i tl-'-- 1. ,.. 1, , ' -'-- - ',.. c. ,• i' 10. ' re',• i i 1 .\ 1 j. iii."- t. 7. : . ,,,,, . . s., 15, 11. ,,,, zs ,, , e, \ \ \ I i at, .' 1 -'. i i'. M ND t. .., . .,, 1 , , X 10 VD i el I" rin211114°, 1.,"„-, '- i.. - - 3 1 L4, risia i tibial- I s- e- r. s, sr -.-.- 7 , . 7, .... r- li. • issoi CT. ', I 1 1 1 r:: il Z1314- 1,.. ic. 1;• i,:•.- 1- 4: t 1 . I 1. zio. r T- 1 1..... m...., i I , I I...,.....:.. 11 ......:........:....:: Z '''' Ir .---- ------ G , . R.... 3 0„,„ ,,, R. 72.: R .. L.....,, I s• •• • N. . L., IVAIni. r------__ 1 1 ' - T I ,' 104 - i 00 1 11_ -' 7,.. , 7 Imos2mH1 0 ': F. ' 1, ' 5:....: 7,- iii\v'.' 1, k 4"'`, • 1.' gal I me•___ . m. _ n, _-_ ______,:;:. N E • la .-' f, 7 1 t o , I -; , - R.... 3 7,..., iZ - II R3 3 • 1, 4 . .. '. 1 45 1 mugmar_, u = LEA a D- n. ' - . IEND . ... 1 ' II tell N E 1 Ir. PL ri- IX.• 4, 4 i r . i4_, :. Igens.„.? 1 slim - & Sit IrlfektilVon . . 81S•• 11, ti , 2' s • 3 le , f f I 4° i"..?„,: i 35 ,/ ...... jw JIM a '''' 1111 WM . • '',' fq• E , T.' 6., 9. 10 11. 1. .-(•••.,..., s '.,,, c; I! NM AT, I., .,_., . , G . 2.• : 12.. . %. . , • . , an ' 4 ' 1.' .. lets'. : 4 ' r '''' '''''-' P. 4 i. c5Ii.. "''''''' s. ''' 1 II 43 ir LP A 0 Is .. . r. , .. INIIII• a . if,...• - 11: 1„; 1111111P t' Y' , I* :... VII 3' N E 1• TN PL. 3 0 N e ms -- '' ' 14k.• 4 41r. • 1. f. ..."..., : 14 ;: 1:::,: lf: l' N• : 4 :, 1 EIZEIreinnii' OMNI 1 n g. 01, mii? i. : Z., , I 7,.....: a 1 1 t• Alif . A.,----...., ,, .. ., I girplij 3 I LI 5 14] I 4 3 41,;•, 4, 4,',. I:. •• 113 f 6 1 1 1.. i.. 15. j 4 raMah I Abp.:, I i 0:_. SINI Min.. lin E0 moo MD IOW mIr— I . I l .., ,.. ,-..... ,.. 61.., , t'• ' LI •. 1 .,,. , Ili . 1 4 7... 7 1 I N. E. 10.. r.• 5T. '-'-' s 1i Z I*!. ` 1. . .'! r-°_.'• 1; K''',, iii7: w3 7-. 33 I „ la": f• 1 F4' 1 I 1 1 i* . 111441E [' i4131• 1 .' 1'"' 11. - 6 ' C.)1-' Z---'• 4.' 13 , '.-. . i‘-' g. • i E ,, e0-• _.,_- 1': - . of- g111111rTIMBVI • 4. 11 ., 1 - CO,.-:- 17-, 4 3- N. , It'• Il_ t II - L ... I f-,-, 7 f witA A, - , 1. .; Flt, pert,.,-° 4,:, I 1 -:!:..: -- ft il. I. _ L! i, m . 7. :.',.''--% A• 4:' 41b147, 14, • ' ' - L in0- I p . 1. 3 4 •''' I- -'' 2' - 4- 4-3, 1. 2'. ,,•.," 4 j 4 ''- t 7t'-, 0; Q... I 2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : 3 a i (o NE 12114 1 R.E N T ON (Al A CSO55 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : PezoNa WILL e f<i=eT UPON HaARl'J - ExAM/NATi©ly APPRov 9. List of all permits, licenses or government approvals required for the proposal federal , state and local --including rezones) : ROZoNE APPLICA-TfoN 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: 5 PLAN TO DEVELOP TO I-OW DENSiTy ;Mth..LT1 - rAMILy 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes , explain: ieS THE fF.OPE.TV 'T0 `fH‘ WOTi-1 iS aoN9ibER FOF ANNCXATiON 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures?. YES M YBE NO b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil? f YES MAYBE NO c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? YES MAYBE KU- d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? f YES MAYBE NO e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f YET- MAYBE NO f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? TB— MAYBE W Explanation: CITY OF RENTON/ WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM VI r 0\ FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Application No. 4n oV% - 77 r/ 4tCro Environmental Checklist No. PROPOSED, date: FINAL, date: Declaration -of Significance Declaration of Significance Declaration of Non-Significance Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a. major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent DoNALb L Lo wcG' 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: 2g16 NE 12- 111 SI- KEN ION WA 61 %5056 226 — 730% 3. Date Checklist submitted 4. Agency requiring Checklist RENTON PI,.ANN1N6- brfPT 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : ZONE F.oM 4. 7200 TO l2 ( LON iENSiTy MOLTi FAMIL.y ) 9NI eoNFO Akte --to C„oNF'( HeNSI V PLAN 0 4- 5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land, animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? VET— MAYBE Nf b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? J YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement Joffauna? YES- MAYBE NO d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce .new light or glare? V YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? YET— MAYBE NO Explanation: PLAN 'TO D6'VE LOP L -i tD LOVJ DeNSiTy MULTI— AMi._ DIE La- I6+JGS 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? z YES MAYBE NO b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? YET MAYBE NO Explanation: 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 3- 2) Air. Will the proposal result in: a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? V VAS MAYBE NO b) The creation of objectionable odors? YES MAYBE N6— c) Alteration of air movement , moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents , or the course, of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? l YES MAYBE NO b) Changes in .absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? YES MAYBE NO c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? YES MAYBE' NO d) Change in' the amount of surface water in any water body? YES MAYBE NO e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? u( YES MAYBE N- f), Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters?u( YES MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE NO h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection , or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria , or other substances into the ground waters? YES MAYBE NO i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? YES MAY BE N Explanation : 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass , crops , microflora and aquatic plants)? YES MAYBE W b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? YES MAYBE NO d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? YES M YBE NO Explanation: 6- d) Sewer or septic tanks? YES MAYBE NO e) Storm water drainage?V YES MAYBE NE" f) Solid waste and disposal ? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: SHOKT 20O fFl. ) %XTCN , TO SgRVE— PfOPGRT'yc 100 FT . F .OM STORM (A)A—rE . INA4C 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? if YET— MAYBE NO Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an .aesthetically offensive site open to public view? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: III . SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on mymy part. Proponent: signed / Iii / el L L t e.-Cli name printed) City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 5- 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: WILL MAKc MODE HOLl5iN6 A-VA LA 1 LC 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a) Generation of additional vehicular movement?f YES MAYBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities ,• or demand for new parking? YES MAYBE NO c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? L YET- MAYBE NO d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? 1/ YES MAYBE NO e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? YES MAYBE NO f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? Y/ YES— MAYBE NO Explanation: 14) Public' Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? YES M YBE NO b) Police protection? YES AhAYYBE NO c) Schools? YES MAYBE Ni( d) Parks or other recreational facilities? YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services? i V YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? c FEB MAYBE AB b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? YES MAYBE Explanation: 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems , or alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? YES M NO b) Communications systems? of YES MAYBE NO c) Water? YES MAYBE NO r V.: THE CITY OF RENTON c MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o • 4 co CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • PLANNINGDEPARTMENTO gTr M0 P 235—2550 0 SF April 21 , 1977 Donald L. Luedke 3916 N. E. 12th St. Renton, WA 98055• Dear Mr. Luedke : RE : NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR REZONE APPLICATION R-041-77 Gentlemen : The Renton Planning Department formally accepted theabovementionedapplicationonApril5 , 1977 pu:lic hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examinerhasbeensetfor9:00 AM, May 3, 1977 Representatives of the applicant are asked to be pre-se'-t. All interested persons are invited to attend thehearing . If you have any further questions , please calltheRentonPlanningDepartment , 235-2550. t Very truly yours , . ..' Gordon Y . Ericksen Planning Director i 1 i By:IMIti/c/. 1745;m7—it fP4111 Associate Planner wr ri 11 isY T I i q. i NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON, ON MAY 3, 19 77 , AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . APPLICATION FOR FINAL PLAT APPROVAL ; file No . FP-040-77 ; property located south of Puget Drive S . E . and east of the Benson Hill Apartments between Bonneville Power Transmission Line Right-of-way and Aberdeen Place S . E. 4/ 2 . REZONE FROM G-7200 TO R-2 ; file No . R-041-77 ; property located at 3916 N . E. 12th Street. 3. SITE APPROVAL IN M-P ZONE; file No . SA-043-77 ;' property located at 550 S. W. 7th St. Legal descriptions of applications noted above 'on file in Renton Planning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON MAY 3, 1977 AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. GORDON Y. ERICKSEN PUBLISHED April 24 , 1977 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I , Michael L . Smith HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE, PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW . ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, - a Notary Public, on the 2istday of . April 19 771 . ,SIGNED ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO : Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department Public Works Department Building Div. Traffic Engineering Div . Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div. FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his desi gnee) SUBJECT : Review of ECF-- 237- 77 ;. .Application No . : IL-04/-77 I Action Name : Oem IJ Lgig,44 e f-7Loo Please review the attached . Review requested by ( date) : 4 /f/7°7 REVIEW BY ' OTHER CITY ' DEPARTMENTS : v ,_ _. i,..,,. Department : Comments : z 7 Signatur Director or Autho ized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : (i , L - L—wGot. Comments : .S'4n,44y Ss,14,7 ., e•-•ev j fir. e? o vv pea"vaix, JGJLJ a-r2 c ,V# 24 s cAJ en 74,2- M v L T, -d"A-A..%)c/ pe.crwt. vA 74,7t 404 eft"' G'sr/s 1 /h, /re- Z 7 A LL vi=F c/ J /A4 pod run r "Weil-WV i Sr*.I0o AleA j4,4 A 4—/-77 Signature of Direct or Authorized Representative Date 6-76 OVER) REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 7-7 F/c 4/Gr Comments : p//ie-ip l Z tfftGr 2/3/7 7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : NCR c Q Comments : ek r ee.s 4-L 1 44- ?'7 Signaturege of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 1 INTERDEPARTMENTAL REVIEW REQUEST TO : X PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR X BUILDING DIVISION x ENGINEERING DIVISION RAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION X UTILITIES DIVISION' C . FIRE DEPARTMENT HEALTH DEPARTMENT FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT ,11cd 111 ` Contact Person R E : Li4 • jcyrsie, Xvo IWl 4.Tho Z- If-04/-77its Please review the attached information regarding the subject proposal and return it to the Planning Department by with your written recommendation . Your response will be included as part of the staff report to the Hearing Examiner. Thank you , PLANNING DEPARTMENT Date 4 OF 41 . PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT C.) / ' `M 2 z .. .. o BUILDING DIVISION 235 -2540 co' MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o414T April 12, 1977FO e CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR TO: Planning Department FROM: Building Division SUBJECT: Luedke Rezone We have no objections to rezone to R-2. JCH/mp O ENTO 124, tiQ A VC/ING /' f PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING MAY 3, 1977 APPLICANT: DONALD L. LUEDKE FILE NO. : R-041-77 ; REZONE REQUEST FROM G-7200 , GENERAL CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT, TO R-2 , RESIDENCE DISTRICT A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests rezone from G-7200 to R-2 to allow construction of low density multi -family dwellings in conformance with the Compre- hensive Plan for the area . B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1 . Owner of Record : DONALD L . LUEDKE 2 . Applicant : DONALD L . LUEDKE 3 . Location : 3916 N . E. 12th Street 4 . Legal Description : Detailed legal description available on file in the Renton Planning Department . 5 . Size of Property : Approximately . 9 acres . 6 . Access : Via N. E . 12th Street . 7 . Existing Zone : G-7200 . 8 . Existing Zoning G-7200 , General Classification District , i.n Area : Single Family Residence ; B-1 , Business District . 9 . Comprehensive Low Density Multiple Family Residential Land Use Plan : 10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance . C. PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Subject rezone request to R-2 zoning is to allow future development as per R-2 standards . D. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject site was annexed to the City on April 27 , 1967 , by Ordinance No . 2323 . The G-7200 zone corresponds to the previous County zoning designation prior to annexation . E. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography : The site is relatively level with a slight rise near the middle of the property . 2 . Soils : Alderwood (AgC ) . Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil . Runoff is slow to medium, and hazard of erosion is moderate . This soil is used for timber , pasture , row crops , and urban development. 3 . Vegetation : The southerly one-third of the subject site is rela- tively clear, although there are a certain number of existing PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF MAY 3, 1977 PAGE TWO RE : DONALD L . LUEDKE REZONE REQUEST FROM G-7200 TO R-2 deciduous and evergreen trees . The remaining portion of the site is heavily wooded with many significant trees and vegetation typi - cal of Northwest woodlands . 4 . Wildlife : The existing vegetation on the site provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 5. Water: Surface water or streams are not apparent on the site . 6 . Land Use : There is an existing small single family residence with an appurtenant structure located on the southerly one-third of the subject site. There are two single family residences that are located directly east of the subject site . There are other single family residences situated farther east toward Union Ave . N . E. The Brentwood single family residence subdivision is located south of the subject site across N . E. 12th Street. Several small dilapidated, single family residences and mobile homes are located directly west of the subject site to the powerline right-of-way . The area north of the site to Sunset Boulevard is generally heavily wooded and primarily undeveloped . F. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: The area is a mixture of well -kept single family residences and small dilapidated orr abandoned single family residences . It appears that the subject site is located at the juncture between the well -maintained single family area and the blighted single family area . A well estab- lished single family residence district is located across N . E . 12th Street south of the subject site. G . PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer: An 8" sewer line is located along N . E . 12th Street approximately 200 feet west of Union Avenue N . E . Also , an existing 8" sewer main is located at the corner of N . E . llth Place and N . E . 12th Street. An 8" water main and a 12" storm sewer are located • along N . E . 12th Street. 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements . Any future development on the site will be subject to City of Renton standards . 3. Transit : Metro Route No . 42 operates along N . E . 12th Street. 4 . Schools : The site is within the Renton School District and is within one-half mile of Honeydew Elementary , one-half mile from Sierra Heights Elementary , within one mile of McKnight Middle School , and within one mile of Hazen High School . 5 . Parks : The subject site is within one-half mile of Kiwanis Park and within one-half mile o.f a proposed County park west of Sierra Heights Elementary School . H, APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1 . 4-725 , Amendments . 2 . 4-729 , G , General Classification District. 3 . 4-708 , R-2 , Residence District. I ,- APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS : 1 . Land Use Report , 1965 , page 17 , Objectives , numbers 1 , 2 , 4 , and 6 . r/ 1/ PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF MAY 3 , 1977 PAGE THREE RE : DONALD L . LUEDKE REZONE REQUEST FROM G-7200 TO R-2 2 . Policy Statement, Comprehensive Plan , Renton Urban Area , 1965 , page 4 , item 1 , The Neighborhood. J . IMPACTS ON NATURAL SYSTEMS: Rezoning of the subject property will not have a direct impact on the natural systems . However, eventual development of the site will dis- turb soil and vegetation , increase storm water runoff, and have an effect on traffic and noise levels in the area . K. SOCIAL IMPACTS: The subject request may result in a gradual upgrading of the existing blighted area , thereby creating positive social benefit. However, increased density on the subject site may cause additional social interaction with surrounding properties . L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended (RCW 43. 216 ) , a Declara- tion of Non-significance has been issued for the subject proposal see attached) . This is based upon proper development procedures and retention of as much of the natural character of the site within the ultimate development plan . M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: A vicinity map and site map are attached. N. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 . City of Renton Building Division 2. City of Renton Engineering Division 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 4 . City of Renton Utilities Division 5 . City of Renton Fire Department The above departments approved the applications . Copies of memos from certain departments are attached. O. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1 , The request is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation of low density multiple family for the site and general area north of N . E . 12th Street and south of Sunset Boule- vard . 2. The subject site is situated between several substantial well -kept single family residences to the east and several residential struc- tures and mobile homes in rather poor condition to the west . This creates a difficult land use question , between creating a spot zone of R-2 within the existing single family residential zone and the possibility of stimulating the upgrading of not only the subject site but also the unsightly area west to the powerline right-of-way . It is the latter of these two questions that appears to be the more reasonable and appropriate for the subject site and area . 3. The R-2 zoning would allow either the subdivision of the subject property into 7200 square foot minimum lots for approximately two to three duplex residential structures or by special use per- mit approximately eight to ten townhouse type dwelling units . 4 . The site has an abundance of natural amenities including interest- ing topography, many significant trees , and much vegetation that should be incorporated into any site development plan . j PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF MAY 3 , 1977 PAGE FOUR RE : DONALD L . LUEDKE REZONE REQUEST FROM G-7200 TO R-2 5 . If the R-2 zoning is approved, adjacent single family residences should be protected from possible detrimental impacts through suitable setbacks , landscaping , and screening. 6 . The existing structures on the subject site may deter proper redevelopment of the site. P. PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of R-2 rezone subject to the following conditions to be filed as restrictive covenants running with the land : 1 . EXISTING STRUCTURES The existing structures located on the subject site shall be removed from the site or remodeled to present Building Code requirements prior to commencement of any new construction . 2 . SETBACKS No building or structure shall be permitted within 30 feet of the south property line , within 30 feet of the east property line for the southerly 150 feet thereof, within 15 feet of the remaining portion along the east property line , and within 10 feet of the west property line. 3. LANDSCAPE PLANS A detailed landscape plan for the entire site development shall be submitted to and approved by the Renton Planning Department at the time of site development plan submittal . 4 . LANDSCAPE AREAS All setback areas except for ingress/egress location shall be suitably landscaped and approved by the Renton Planning Depart- ment . A suitable architectural type screening fence shall be incorporated into the landscaping along the east. property line . • 5. SITE PRESERVATION Existing trees and vegetation shall be incorporated into the development plans as much as possible. Site clearing , selective tree cutting , and grading shall be permitted only in conformance with an approved site plan and specific Planning Department approval . 6 . STORM WATER RETENTION Storm drainage plans shall be submitted at the time of site development. Such plans shall include suitable on-site retention to provide for the same runoff rate for a 25-year storm period as is presently experienced on the site , together with suitable oil water separation facilities . 7 . DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31 , 2050 . It is further agreed and covenanted by the undersigned that, if a development plan is not submitted to the City of Renton pur- suant to these and other City requirements within two ( 2) years , and substantial construction begun within three (3 ) years of the filing of these covenants , and said construction and development diligently prosecuted toward completion thereafter, the zoning of said property shall without further City action revert back to to the zoning which existed prior to the filing of this document , and these covenants shall become null and void . The term "sub- stantial construction" shall mean .the physical alteration of the land for construction pursuant to City approved development plans as per the above mentioned conditions and a valid building permit , PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF MAY 3,. 1977 PAGE FIVE RE : DONALD L . LUEDKE REZONE REQUEST FROM G-7200 TO R-2 or construction of required utilities for such development. The above mentioned time periods may be extended for reasonable cause upon written request to and approval by the Renton Plan- ning Department . Such reasonable cause shall include , but may not be limited to , the requirement of an environmental impact statement pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 . The subject recommendation is consistent with the Land Use Plan , compatible with adjacent properties , and will serve to stimulate and upgrade a blighted area within the existing community. 4pF 11 4 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION 235 -2540o MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 O gTfO Z- April 12, 1977 SEP CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR TO: Planning Department FROM: Building Division SUBJECT: Luedke Rezone We have no objections to rezone to R-2. 11 JCH/mp ING ` X. TT' es le eeF ,\ y / , '- .\,, 1 1.,^'1 .`4' v.. a T'...' • . ., u I• Gd jJa IMP IMP Wil.- G—/4200 '''' ° '?..'n: '‘;3,....z 1 .1 . f ,,Q`:/ Pi, 1,SI J 11 11 , 1 I :rH N 10 6, Q,_I-.1.!/ !, 4 i I ' 11 1\ i .t s` was 4 I • 13'3 G L 111 _ 1 El ,..,i,:. .,imiiii., ..... 1R-3 , r,r_ft_2 .. _,...: .. i t I '. g . It 1 e. - lb.- ... .4 , a - R.-3 s J : et °D... R-3 i 4._....' _,...,I. e.,,,w steilwo 1 . ,1,. i ',,. yam. 2 vid Q+© T..a`->',, itch,l ,5. , e ai I ':• f-'' N.E. TM 11, 0. 4 ': MP f'. 1 .> ' 1 ' d .` 7f u n u',y, E • r.l+ '•1.I Z ''* f ,1 6J d® wl ' ' ,a ni,... r.`F i NM,' 2 `•_ 1=®opadil e - ' •" . LLl I' $ ,• IIN.E m 7. ../n . n' dQ11 .2,•,,,,1• f ,0 11_ _ I 1 e' ' d Ec. _ !1 W e± a s,. ,1 „i.s,,.1 fit b i- ., °;_ a&= ISM&• , 1 rk©a©©F N rLIQtw qT I t '. ya,. .1, ai r 'Nf e1r. I t... I '1ry T. I t TJI I W i. ,-T';, •',I 1 •.4}: JO • I^;:tr.L`I It'Z"-,N 'j l 1_; t- ,n N E to . sT. i y t :101 .y1 F .171,1.1,1;J:1 , t.`' m 4 7Ti akie ' 1 _•._._•. l.l.a..•-.._._ ._.r.. Q 10 3' 1 G ;i., WT h.E 4'f' e ..5` I ey a — 1., „ 4 1 -•_ 1 E '• a• E I 6 Et , 1, s 1 REZONE: I DONALD L . LUEDKE ; Appl . R-041-77 ; Rezone from G-7200 to R-2 ; property located at 3916 N . E. 12th Street. 1 APPLICANT DONALD L . LUEDKE TOTAL AREA ± . 9 acre PRINCIPAL ACCESS Shelton Ave. and N . E. 12th St . EXISTING ZONING G-7200 EXISTING USE Single Family Residence/Undeveloped PROPOSED USE Low Density Multi -family Residential COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Low Density Multi -Family Residential COMMENTS 1 1pi maw Cr6E,c A il :. 0ia \ s4-7. a 1 1 neotEI a. A ya 0 c 6iff L/M175 Z o I iffie dui ANNA so amp iN , , r i 1,,,,,Ae®— tie., 4"w fiiifle r4TPa 11 378 I y 3® 1 F. S.F. oe II at F. m.g. + m4E3 4370motessati1.6°).itlig: $.1' I 31J Lo — 1 Sec. r fi•E • /Z i . 1 CD 0 t He ile .rzni 4-3'.'. GE 0 Cr-:1 ,A4 1 0);Mli xel,, 31F3 € i li Q 01 1 tt %Iv Do 4 0 Nil ailia ".., 3fw 0 0 • 0 ui D o 1Q00a 0 ,., p 0 in r_i ae tiro cr. . a a D a 0 000 1a 0 Na Up fir. 0 k- Q 1 c k 13 Cil MOinlog 1 5C4LE 11::2oo' Dom1 L. LL bP3. gezwi : z-O+I-77 1 PROPOSED/FINAL __CLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE: .__)N—SIGNIFICANCE Application No . R-041-77 0 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-239-77 CO FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Applicant requests rezone from G-7200 to R-2 to allow construction of low density multi -family dwellings in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan for the area . Proponent DONALD L . LUEDKE Location of Proposal 3916 N . E. 12th Street Lead Agency Renton Planning Department This proposal has been determined to 0 have x not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was ma a after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a ( proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official Gordon Y. Ericksen Title Planning Director Date April 26 . 1977 Signature J/A A 12/ , (,-' . , -„, City of Renton Planning Department MAY 1, 1977 WE, the undersigned residents of Renton, Washington, have studied and are familiar with the proposed Rezone request known as the Donald L. Luedke Rezone Request from G-7200 to R-2, File No. R-041-77, located at 3916 - N. E. 12th St. , Renton, Washington. We object to the granting of this Rezone request for the following reasons: 1. The above rezoning request does not comply with the Renton Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, Revised August, 1976. 2, Granting of the rezone request would increase the traffic problem which already exists on N. E, 12th Street and would further jeopardize the safety of children walking to school, 3. The increase in population would increase the overcrowding in the schools. 4. Existing sewers are not designed for multi-family use. 5. The effect of this rezoning would increase the existing imbalance of multi-family dwellings in the affected area, 6. The rezoning would create a spot zone of R-2 zoning within the. existing single-family residential zone. This would also open the way for other property owners to reasonably expect similar requests in zoning changes. 7. Multi-family development will increase the noise pollution in the area, 8. This zoning change would reduce the marketability of single- family residences in the immediate area. The general result of this zoning change would be to significantly reduce the quality of life now existing in the neighborhood. For this reason the majority of property owners in the neighborhood strongly oppose this request for rezoning. Name lease print) Signature Address r t1. fl L-E , L--/S JO/ 5 7M „0,,A ( 2. j a._ A k !`S o z 3 c(5 A( , lL S A 3. A,. ,)1/ 1/4 cam, frGi/J,f ?i' Li 1/%/v I 4., 1 t r;r Ac.f / e i.v'ia l. :;4 r-G/ /`3// :f' ' / s/, . 5. 6, 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. MAY 1, 1977 WE, the undersigned residents of Renton, Washington, have studied and are familiar with the proposed Rezone request known as the Donald L. Luedke Rezone Request from G-7200 to R-2, File No. R-041-77, located at 3916 - N. E. 12th St. , Renton, Washington. We object to the granting of this Rezone request for the following reasons: 1. The above rezoning request does not comply with the Renton Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, Revised August, 1976. 2. Granting of the rezone request would increase the traffic problem which already exists on N. E. 12th Street and would further jeopardize the safety of children walking to school. 3. The increase in population would increase the overcrowding in the schools. 4. Existing sewers are not designed for multi-family use. 5. The effect of this rezoning would increase the existing imbalance of multi-family dwellings in the affected area. 6. The rezoning would create a spot zone of R-2 zoning within the existing single-family residential zone. This would also open the way for other property owners to reasonably expect similar requests in zoning changes. 7. Multi-family development will increase the noise pollution in the area. 8. This zoning change would reduce the marketability of single- family residences in the immediate area. The general result of this zoning change would be to significantly reduce the quality of life now existing in the neighborhood. For this reason the majority of property owners in the neighborhood strongly oppose this request for rezoning. Name (please print) Signature Address d 1. /a/e,C E,rJC IN levm-2 7 6 d/e U e 2. Qo d, 90, „ A 3. ChAF-P_I 39e) 9 1.E /< ` - 3. <;AOIC/,i' ,(" 117,'i -, %I?1Ai r1r s4. <X .(7),i%CL/7 / _ ,10/ e/ // r /7G 4. 1\1 l (-Nr s'" , z1-4"1 lci ay 11A,.(,'„O )1,,/,t (1rt.,. co) / NL l/f(, C 5 0 4 - (•.P R ( ///W 77'-'/6—. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. F,:› RECEIVED CITY OF RENTONr`1 HEARING EXAMINER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAY 31977 PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER Nm PM PUBLIC HEARING 7,8,9,ta,ll,t2,1,2,3,4,5,6 A MAY 3, 1977 XHIBIT NO. / APPLICANT: DONALD L. LUEDKE ITEM NO. A2— D 47— 77 FILE NO. : R-041-77 ; REZONE REQUEST FROM G-7200 , GENERAL CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT, TO R-2 , RESIDENCE DISTRICT A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests rezone from G-7200 to R-2 to allow construction of low density multi -family dwellings in conformance with the Compre- hensive Plan for the area . B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1 . Owner of Record : DONALD L . LUEDKE 2 . Applicant: DONALD L . LUEDKE 3 . Location : 3916 N. E . 12th Street 4 . Legal Description : Detailed legal description available on file in the Renton Planning Department . 5 . Size of Property : Approximately . 9 acres . 6 . Access : Via N . E . 12th Street . 7 . Existing Zone : G-7200 . 8 . Existing Zoning G-7200 , General Classification District , in Area : Single Family Residence ; B- 1 , Business District. 9 . Comprehensive Low Density Multiple Family Residential Land Use Plan : 10. Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance . C. PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Subject rezone request to R-2 zoning is to allow future development as per R-2 standards . D. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject site was annexed to the City on April 27 , 1967 , by Ordinance No . 2323 . The G-7200 zone corresponds to the previous County zoning designation prior to annexation . E. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography : The site is relatively level with a slight rise near the middle of the property . 2 . Soils : Alderwood (AgC ) . Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil . Runoff is slow to medium, and hazard of erosion is moderate. This soil is used for timber , pasture , row crops , and urban development. 3 . Vegetation : The southerly one-third of the subject site is rela- tively clear, although there are a certain number of existing PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF MAY 3, 1977 PAGE TWO RE : DONALD L . LUEDKE REZONE REQUEST FROM G-7200 TO R-2 deciduous and evergreen trees . The remaining portion of the site is heavily wooded with many significant trees and vegetation typi - cal of Northwest woodlands . 4 . Wildlife : The existing vegetation on the site provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 5 . Water: Surface water or streams are not apparent on the site . 6 . Land Use : There is an existing small single family residence with an appurtenant structure located on the southerly one-third of. the subject site. There are two single family residences that are located directly east of the subject site . There are other single family residences situated farther east toward Union Ave . N . E. The Brentwood single family residence subdivision is located south of the subject site across N. E . 12th Street . Several small dilapidated, single family residences and mobile, homes are located directly west of the subject site to the powerline right-of-way . The area north of the site to Sunset Boulevard is generally heavily wooded and primarily undeveloped . F. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: The area is a mixture of well -kept single family residences and small dilapidated or abandoned single family residences . It appears that the subject site is located at the juncture between the well -maintained single family area and the blighted single family area . A well estab- lished single family residence district is located across N . E . 12th Street south of the subject site. G . PUBLIC SERVICES: 1 . Water and Sewer: An 8" sewer line is located along N . E . 12th Street approximately 200 feet west of Union Avenue N. E . Also , an existing 8" sewer main is located at the corner of N . E. 11th Place and N . E . 12th Street. An 8" water main and a _12" storm sewer are located • along N . E . 12th Street. 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements . Any future development on the site will be subject to City of Renton standards . 3. Transit: Metro Route No . 42 operates along N . E . 12th Street. 4 . Schools : The site is within the Renton School District and is within one-half mile of Honeydew Elementary , one-half mile from Sierra Heights Elementary, within one mile of McKnight Middle School , and within one mile of Hazen High School . 5 . Parks : The subject site is within one-half mile of Kiwanis Park and within one-half mile of a proposed County park west of Sierra Heights Elementary School . H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONIEG CODE: 1 . 4-725 , Amendments . 2 . 4-729 , G , General Classification District. 3. 4-708 , R-2 , Residence District. I . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS: 1 . Land Use Report , 1965 , page 17 , Objectives , numbers 1 , 2 , 4 , and 6 . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF MAY 3 , 1977 PAGE THREE RE : DONALD L . LUEDKE REZONE REQUEST FROM G-7200 TO R-2 2 . Policy Statement, Comprehensive Plan , Renton Urban Area , 1965 , page 4, item 1 , The Neighborhood. J . IMPACTS ON NATURAL SYSTEMS: Rezoning of the subject property will not have a direct impact on the natural systems . However, eventual development of the site will dis- turb soil and vegetation , increase storm water runoff, and have an effect on traffic and noise levels in the area . K. SOCIAL IMPACTS: The subject request may result in a gradual upgrading of the existing. blighted area , thereby creating positive social benefit. However, increased density on the subject site may cause additional social interaction with surrounding properties . L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended (RCW 43 . 216 ) , a Declara- tion of Non-significance has been issued for the subject proposal see attached ) . This is based upon proper development procedures and retention of as much of the natural character of the site within the ultimate development plan . M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: A vicinity map and site map are attached. N. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 . City of Renton Building Division 2. City of Renton Engineering Division 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 4 . City of Renton Utilities Division 5 . City of Renton Fire Department The above departments approved the applications . Copies of memos from certain departments are attached . O. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1 , The request is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation of low density multiple family for the site and general area north of N . E . 12th Street and south of Sunset Boule- vard. 2. The subject site is situated between several substantial well -kept single family residences to the east and several residential struc- tures and mobile homes in rather poor condition to the west . This creates a difficult land use question , between creating a spot zone of R-2 within the existing single family residential zone and the possibility of stimulating the upgrading of not only the subject site but also the unsightly area west to the powerline right-of-way . It is the latter of these two questions that appears to be the more reasonable and appropriate for the subject site and area . 3. The R-2 zoning would allow either the subdivision of the subject property into 7200 square. foot minimum lots for approximately two to three duplex residential structures or by special use per- mit approximately eight to ten townhouse type dwelling units . 4 . The site has an abundance of natural amenities including interest- ing topography, many significant trees , and much vegetation that should be incorporated into any site development plan . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF MAY 3 , 1977 PAGE FOUR RE : DONALD L . LUEDKE REZONE REQUEST FROM G-7200 TO R-2 5 . If the R-2 zoning is approved, adjacent single family residences should be protected from possible detrimental impacts through suitable setbacks , landscaping , and screening . 6 . The existing structures on the subject site may deter proper redevelopment of the site. P. PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of R-2 rezone subject to the following conditions to be filed as restrictive covenants running with the land :. 1 . EXISTING STRUCTURES The existing structures located on the subject site shall be removed from the site or remodeled to present Building Code requirements prior to commencement of any new construction . 2 . SETBACKS No building or structure shall be permitted within 30 feet of the south property line , within 30 feet of the east property line for the southerly 150 feet thereof, within 15 feet of the remaining portion along the east property line , and within 10 feet of the west property line. 3. LANDSCAPE PLANS A detailed landscape plan for the entire site development shall be submitted to and approved by the Renton Planning Department at the time of site development plan submittal . 4. LANDSCAPE AREAS All setback areas except for ingress/egress location shall be suitably landscaped and approved by the Renton Planning Depart- ment . A suitable architectural type screening fence shall be incorporated into the landscaping along the east property line . • 5. SITE PRESERVATION Existing trees and vegetation shall be incorporated into the development plans as much as possible. Site clearing , selective tree cutting , and grading shall be permitted only in conformance with an approved site plan and specific Planning Department approval . 6 . STORM WATER RETENTION Storm drainage plans shall be submitted at the time of site development. Such plans shall include suitable on-site retention to provide for the same runoff rate for a 25-year storm period as is presently experienced on the site , together with suitable oil water separation facilities . 7 . DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31 , 2050 . It is further agreed and covenanted by the undersigned that, if a development plan is not submitted to the City of Renton pur- suant to these and other City requirements within two (2 ) years , and substantial construction begun within three (3 ) years of the filing of these covenants , and said construction and development diligently prosecuted toward completion thereafter, the zoning of said property shall without further City action revert back to to the zoning which existed prior to the filing of this document , and these covenants shall become null and void. The term ."sub- stantial construction" shall mean the physical alteration of the land for construction pursuant to City approved development plans as per the above mentioned conditions and a valid building permit , PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF MAY 3 , 1977 PAGE FIVE RE : DONALD L . LUEDKE REZONE REQUEST FROM G-7200 TO R-2 or construction of required utilities for such development. The above mentioned time periods may be extended for reasonable cause upon written request to and approval by the Renton Plan- ning Department . Such reasonable cause shall include , but may not be limited to , the requirement of an environmental impact statement pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 . The subject recommendation is consistent with the Land Use Plan , compatible with adjacent properties , and will serve to stimulate and upgrade a blighted area within the existing community . PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTFi32 BUILDING DIVISION 235 -2540zo MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 A 0. o, Q TfO SEPS O April 12, 1977 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR TO: Planning Department FROM: Building Division SUBJECT: Luedke Rezone We have no objections to rezone to R-2. l JCH/mp IP?; fi A X J-11:L T11-,-FIT.-4— 1 1 F `'' sue Nam. ., d•1 1.•y"' S, Iu4 ±t i G 4—r200 ''''' 4'.i,-,T. \,I,, , A,„,,,, 4-,,,, e pima Ai?, h/ l„ II .5 y - a n Q( I 11 i i G i.•o. t• 4 ,, ,,t4jtj1, l feat+u 6T No+ 1 .} 1I elIiic& r 11 111IIZ94Sc7ew,c.,7,•,•I,c,a\ st •a_ JR-3i1 • .,I op rifio 1 1• r---1 1 i;:m =f i 1i,-T-lii,.. --4 11 11 c: w!'iiiiii i t {t _moo'_.._, e 1I il,,"' aall1 2 1. I I$ . I I s r tz e I i.1- 0. win Ts F t,.a , R-3 aria roaiiiike-4--NS,W.T z • re ert vy e G e_ itrip x t 'sl o x, G a'e e s a e' ' 9: s 1•N.E. tw ®d IS i-1 4Y.. H- 1' LIB i I '_1°.. •1_4•. W .00 i,„,, pr t'yOl r. y 2'iw 'b ', rt l p\ 4., t' Z I13i ff i., . 'a +,• 1—' m©. ©O riSSICE Y e 3.• 7 In .• al1a„1 _--_ I I . Ve QMi. IMmo © f- Q,v TYIa__ titer '.. . • T• 4&i a N-- -7 L N.E to sT. 0 1 a it{: i;111•i':i 1L t; ;4 j,'L, .1,.,, -I l.a a i i Ja7, I o lf Isl•I L+1e 3i. ktIVIr... 1l d Ius0• -fply 7 1 s 1 67 F' r 'f', t;-`" _ , ;I .,. R—I I Gs OM 7.r off,_ , o... M .- I Rtio LIE1II. ' ' I III II: • .- -l'- . 1 -L Itillia', 10-7., r 1- -I- .,,, ,, a REZONE: DONALD L. LUEDKE ; Appl . R-041-77 ; Rezone from G-7200 to R-2 ; propertyPY located at 3916 N. E. 12th Street. APPLICANT DONALD L . LUEDKE TOTAL AREA ± • 9 acre PRINCIPAL ACCESS Shelton Ave . and N . E . 12th St . EXISTING ZONING G-7200 EXISTING USE Single Family Residence/Undeveloped PROPOSED USE Low Density Multi -family Residential COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Low Density Multi -Family Residential COMMENTS L-1+o-V :3MD731 7arQ71,7 •7 Q-ri Mvd L M ii4Aiorens ooz- se n 0%1Iiii ‘.... VI\ 0 _ ® ysle 3,v 01r-prUrri-'': i 40 ® ® O 0 ,1 0 C', u7:13. t,.[a03i l 1.,•1011) 11. 6'•< E!:n) s i.%.,. e-. 0L..al i Ift:,ii1i 1 jFtOfF 01'1 3 1` h Pilll VW Q n 0 o 3 ai 1 cr a ® 0 0 m• 115 . . sEic IC 13,, a\ I 0 ' ' CP ; Ls wiz/ • vw \ 14'2 I — 1 tat Aziw. c i. Elt o f rsf 341 WC I Elf C3LC WTI e ''' s 1 sQ.,...... strom I1 we 1-,r eiod ii_i.. . .... am 1 4%1 1 t . 011 a --A-- 1. 1' 1 1 ) ae 1 LB. MI TIII MP \MEP 110 MIMINS '1 SJlrvl7 /&11 7. t Vogt/ i i A 0 1..., 1. 0 OV, / Moil I I callii, o PROPOSED/FINAL -":LARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/ ,'N-SIGNIFICANCE Application No . R-041-77 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-239-77 CI] FINAL Declaration Hescri tion ofp proposal Applicant requests rezone from G-7200 to R-2 I to allow construction of low density multi -family dwellings in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan for the area . Proponent DONALD L . LUEDKE Location of Proposal 3916 N . E . 12th Street Lead Agency Renton Planning Department This proposal has been determined to 0 have not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS is is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) (c ) . This decision was ma e after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a ( proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official Gordon Y . Ericksen Title Planning Director Date April 26 . 1977 Si gnature C Y-- ic City of Renton G"`= '--Planning Department N RECEIVEDCITYOFRENTONC; REZONE APPLICATION APR 5 1977 1 For Office Use Only: 9• 2 APPL. NO. I -o - 77 PLANNING COMMISSION AC LNG DE? 5.Q -b'EE; RECEIPT NO. 7i9 APPEAL FILED FILING DATE 5/-- ?7 CITY COUNCIL ACTION HEARING DATE ORDINANCE NO. & DATE APPLICANT ITO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 10 : 1. Name Dnnnld L. Luedke phone 226_710 2. Address 1916 Northeast 12 strut, Renton, T•IA.311ir g an 93055 3. Property petitioned for rezoning is located on y1Fi St' " t betwet and 4 . Square, footage or acreage of property 4112 oyu3ro foot .112 :M5 5. Legal "'description of property (if more space is required, attach separlte sheet) tlrsx 3ortia 385 fool of the WU4L 112 foot of Llae L'.ie,t 617.6° fool of Lhe: Southummt a c Sft ;.y2 in the City of Renton, County of. King, State of Washington. 6. Existing zoning (.r 7 v Zoning Requested NOTE TO APPLICANT: The following factors are considered in reclass- ifying property. Evidence or additional information to substantiate your request may be attached to this sheet. (See Application Procedure sheet for "specific requirements) . ' Submit this form in duplicate. 7. Proposed use of site. , w (Jens f y ma /f - t Yrt,du) ; 1 1 11 C )l+ I .,r jr, ct p [.tl t/ A e C a a7 f- r e 1r e.e.r 5'I d e ?/e1 / J 4.S r C h a c e fir 0,,9 S•ec A de.bre top, it t'IX 1 /? , o S" %r ['f3 8 . List the measures to be taken to reduce impact on the surrounding area. 4. -a 2zn, c uK p an -9,2.P-A.¢-r,Ln. 2._ lLef cneH a-, 44LP.e edl 9 . How soon after the rezone is granted do you intend to develop the site? l/Z yz. 6/4 10. Two copies of .plot plan and affidavit of ownership are required. Planning Dept. 2-73 AFFIDAVIT I , T)nnalrl T. TAyadkP $ 5ukumal I uedke being duly sworn, declare that I am- the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me 4th April this xx day of 1xxife( 1977 , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at City of Renton Yezet,--4_ City of Renton Name of Notary Public) Signature of Owner) o-e) 3916 Northeast 12 Street, Renton Address.) Address) Washington Pepfyn State) WaGhi City) 226-7308 Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations—o the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such app "ffatRtx/ 2\ Date Received 2j , 9 By: .1i APR 5 1977 o 2 Renton Planning Dept . Ar DEpP 2-73 fig Ariel" full 45:T e ,. It.I ç /;;N \ 0 AP11 ; 6- -it / ..*- a4It 4 '1. 0!,1 ',', " 5E' lam!7 2 - ' ',• 1 0 I R 5 1977 a • a s 1 • sfl tif.. 7..”.'''''''''''''''''''. 442:4422422eve .,‘,/..4 21 I 1 N 1,_• +, 1". 2 a ,I° . , . n a '+° i I /i s °1s 1„iI SE ol` ''•I. YYjI I DEP Ns- Fe N 4 i{ I'.I f .s '' , sa a s°fin e•®!* M S+ s 1 G 00 ° •Lre T W Al rT II Is1 . 1 6(.,,. ST— N I © l w rls I__ , Is •Ils l/ .-./i ' ~ ., ,3ib --_ ‘I 4-64 yj`Q 1 ' j 1 a• —r e. e' a. "m`/'. e ::We \ \ 4 4 Z 3 4 rs.: 7,, 111.:,, i. 9.11111:10...:.;;;..Q.i..•;13,1642; r . 1'F il: `ii l •/ R_ „r l.i s 138 s•if7 r - < c. 1 I ram, e z s«4 N N e Mt y// f, ,714 , 111 ai, 144111 ti, ar 11 A. .: j _. -1T Tl.o_-.. 1 1 f./ I 11 1 I J • _S 1 _IL__ 61.111. I t----- - f,..1 1- --- F 4, r--3 R-3 ; o T 7 iltio 1 N E Il>u vMitilAfr 111 .- ; - Ix W pT` + 40 b 35 DIM m nun— d• • 1 1 i =• c T ) o a 43II , QM g I N E '-'".', Jt 14 ' 111, 1T ;10,\ '...( IMMM 1,r_un1 f'IG ii _ I. 1/ y .. I meW 2t : 11' i fI.1 ' r'- //. I 1 1e 'ao..` ynsf; flill•_ , .;` •"eeeQ ees ZofB[ f Nem rl ; ,.., ` i - 4 Ii" ,,I+I D _'• f®i7(1 W a • 1 d® f'S ,io• ,' '. l'i • _1: K r• i Q.• T IJ I Q ,E b _¢ n is ' y' OA ` [ 1aC GCB} F1 I ` If t 2 I n o ° D 4 31137 71 7 •' dRE N z i w.Iio 9Le a a' • I• i I• 1 I y ht 1 n ,-• I L,__ I aSs vr•IBM s • - u.q__, H ITN 7 t I i ~ IM r l--r— ti F +if• r ',° - 311 j, •N..a .I Rl(]I _>4 I: 11 Z IO X I I I 1 Y .' ¢ .a. ,I.•..x O O ' 11, 11,,Hdl',14.; I I A y1I I H E. 10 rrT.1 a..e.. • !.• v•.mai•MM. I1 I L ' '-1'_t' °. l•I, {I, • ,`1- I. . t i'1 !'I„ 1, a e 1• t_ 39 I 92 I,. r, t..ll } It sr, 0 1 n 0 u`'I+t.,I.°1.,{ 1.,1'L. I ''+tII"'. .1'"IL IT'•I•t t 1 W y^ _Z A JR-i1I. `_ Y 2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : aq vE 12124 ) KENT©N . WA qs0,5-5- 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : PEZON& WILL E irr is T UPON f-iE AAIN6 E(AMINA-r1©N APPeot 9. List of all permits, licenses or government approvals required for the proposal federal , state and local --including rezones) : ggzoNE AP('LICrA•T,ON 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: PLAN TO DEVELOP TO DENSi'Ty !uLt -ri — FA IL_I 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes , explain: E S_ T H E P P,0 P G ) "T O `f H E N o -1-1-i is &E 1 NGa. L b tv 5 i b E R E b For,. ANINGxATIoN 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures?.t/ YES TOTE NO b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil? YES MAYBE NO c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? YES MAYBE N- d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? YES M NO e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? f Y S ROTE NO f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation , deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? TES-- TOTE W Explanation: CITY OF RENTON, WASH I NGTON C, ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM rh tr re r r FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Application No. e of l7 fQ BFPN33 Environmental Checklist No. , e PROPOSED, date: FINAL, date: Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance Declaration of Non-Significance Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C. RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be . prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. . The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a. major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation wouild be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to th,e license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACKGROUND ji 1. Name of Proponent DON ALb l• LUEDKL 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: KENTON , (A/A 61 %O56- 226 - 730% 3. Date Checklist submitted 4. Agency requiring Checklist I.E1'ITON f LANN INS Lb. E 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : REZONE Ff;OM 4 7200 To Z ( Low i ENsiTy MOL-ri FAMILY ) iti LONF otMAhre -to ofriN“-i- NSI Ve PLAN 4- 5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? v( YES MAYBE N b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? Yam- MAYBE NO d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce .new light or glare? V/ YES— MAYS' NO Explanation: _ 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? YES— MAYBE NO Explanation: PLAN TO D6ilE LOPL T D LOVJ De(iSi-ry MtJLTI- 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? s/ YES MAYBE NO b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? J YES MMAYBE NO Explanation: 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in 'the event of an accident or upset conditions? J YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 3- 2) Air. Will the proposal result in: a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? V" YES MAYBE NO b) The creation of objectionable odors? V( YES MAYBE c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or J regionally? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? YES M YBE NO b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff?' YES MBE NO c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? YES MAYBE NO d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? YES MAYBE NO e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? t/ YES MAYBE NO f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? YES MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE NO h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? YES MAYBE NO i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? YES MAYBE Explanation: 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass , crops , r microflora and aquatic plants)? V YES MAYBE TO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique , rare or endangered species of flora? vES- M YBE NO c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? YES MAYBE NO d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? M YBE NO Explanation: 6- d) Sewer or septic tanks? YES ft-o NO e) Storm water drainage? YES MAYBE NO f) Solid waste and disposal? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: SHOT:T SCty 2 ( 200 FT. ) C)( TEN , 10 SGRVE.:. Pf'OPEtTYc too F7, Flom 5TOf; M WA—rE ( R4iNA4E , 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? 1, TES— MAYBE NO Explanation: Y 10) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public', or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical A site, structure, object or building? P/ YES MAYBE NO Explanation: III.. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: signed) name printed) City ofRenton Planning Department 5-76 5- 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: WILL MAKE MOC1G- (-Il U5hNid, , VAILA fLir 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a) Generation of additional vehicular movement?vi YES MAYBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facil'ities,• or demand for new parking? s0 YES MAYBE NO c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? YYE MMAY—BE N d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? vl YES MAYBE NO e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? YES MAYBE NO f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 14) Public` Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? l YES M YBE NO b) Police protection? YES MAYBE NO c) 'Schools? YES MAYBE— NO d) Parks or other recreational facilities? YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services? YES MAMAAYBE NO Explanation: 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? YES MAYBE N b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? YET— MAYBE Explanation: a 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems , or alterations to the following utilities : a) Power or natural gas? YES MAYBE NO b) Communications systems? YES MAYBE NO c) Water? YES MAYBE NO a tj, THE CITY OF RENTON z c MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 9 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI 1 MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENTO, P'QP: lr0%235-2550 0 SERE April 21 , 1977 N.. J_Donald L. Luedke 3916 N. E. 12th St. Renton , WA 98055 a t• Dear Mr. Luedke : RE : NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE r AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR REZONE APPLICATION R-041-77 f. Ge-tlemen : i : The Renton Planning Department formally accepted theabovementionedapplicationonApril5, 1977 pu:iic hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examinerhasbeensetfor9:00 AM, May 3, 1977 Representatives of the applicant are asked to be pre-se't. All interested persons are invited to attend thehe=_rine . If you have any further questions ,the Renton Planning Department , 235-2550. please call F... T i'. Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen liPlanningDirector AdO By: Mi ael L. Smit • Associate Planner wr I i 17 y j. I NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON, ON MAY 3, 19 77 , AT 9 :00 A. M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . APPLICATION FOR FINAL PLAT APPROVAL ; file No . FP-040-77 ; property located south of Puget Drive S . E . and east of the Benson Hill Apartments between Bonneville Power Transmission Line Right-of-way and Aberdeen Place S . E . 2 . REZONE FROM G-7200 TO R-2 ; file No . R-041-77 ; property located at 3916 N . E. 12th Street. 3. SITE APPROVAL IN M-P ZONE ; file No . SA-043-77 ;. property located at 550 S . W. 7th St. Legal descriptions of applications noted above on file in Renton Planning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON MAY 3 , 1977 AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. GORDON Y . ERICKSEN PUBLISHED April 24 , 1977 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I , Michael L . Smith HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: ',Subscribed and sworn to before me, . a Notary Public, on the -2istday of. . April r ,/011F2// 19 77_. .i SIGNED Uld I' ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS .. TO : Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department Public Works Department Building Div. Traffic Engineering Div . Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div. FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee) f c‘ac..1 SUBJECT : Review of ECF- 237— 77 ;. .Application No . : g'04/-77 Action Name : Pona,IJ LiiedieI Qrpd{ .4r+agst 4-7ZOo fo Please review the attached . Review requested by (date) : 4 Ivy REVIEW Br OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : Signatur- t Director or Autho ized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : ( iL, hag-s -- Comments : S4„, '¢y S',vw erg_ Au r-I 4v 11c /c,v e»/r Pea"may, Sia-t)erg C MO P Q•3 G A/en 74/r. hl v L • 'A./4-At IAJ4?tr*. 4.0c,e— G`.re s 1J /Nt /1(c-7 Z A LI_ ai=r r,Pre.,d in.ip ut7 .r at),'-e i n, ASIE7U fi4 Signature of Direct. or Authorized Representative Date II I 6-76 OVER) REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 7:WF/ T L/1/L / s Comments : 3/7/A-Ipi Tpi/aciL i//3/27 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : k1, 6 LIAN- IL I L 4 -?7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 1REVIEW Y OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date INTERDEPARTMENTAL REVIEW REQUEST TO : x PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR BUILDING DIVISION h ENGINEERING DIVISION RAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION X UTILITIES DIVISION' CS:R' FIRE DEPARTMENT HEALTH DEPARTMENT FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT 141 114 Contact Person RE : aU Lueal i IT,PI e ..rep titt. 4-77.00 etZR-t Its Please review the attached information regarding the subject proposal and return it to the Planning Department by with your written recommendation . Your response will be included as part of the staff report to the Hearing Examiner. Thank you , PLANNING DEPARTMENT Date w) pF R• ` V 41 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT z o BUILDING DIVISION rn 235-2540 T,Off`•. MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o co. o Tfo SEP w April 12, 1977 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR TO: Planning Department FROM: Building Division SUBJECT: Luedke Rezone We have no objections to rezone to R-2. JCH/mp col r ticn' NING V PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING MAY 3 , 1977 APPLICANT: DONALD L. LUEDKE FILE NO. : R-041-77 ; REZONE REQUEST FROM G-7200 , GENERAL CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT, TO R-2 , RESIDENCE DISTRICT A SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests rezone from G-7200 to R-2 to allow construction of low density multi -family dwellings in conformance with the Compre- hensive Plan for the area . B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1 . Owner of Record : DONALD L . LUEDKE 2 . Applicant: DONALD L . LUEDKE 3 . Location : 3916 N. E. 12th Street 4 . Legal Description : Detailed legal description available on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5 . Size of Property : Approximately . 9 acres . 6 . Access : Via N. E . 12th Street . 7 . Existing Zone : G-7200 . 8 . Existing Zoning G-7200 , General Classification District , i.n Area : Single Family Residence ; B- 1 , Business District. 9 . Comprehensive Low Density Multiple Family Residential Land Use Plan : 10. Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance . C.1 PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Subject rezone request to R-2 zoning is to allow future development as per R-2 standards . D. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject site was annexed to the City on April 27 , 1967 , by Ordinance No . 2323 . The G-7200 zone corresponds to the previous County zoning designation prior to annexation . E. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography : The site is relatively level with a slight rise near the middle of the property . 2 . Soils : Alderwood (AgC ) . Permeability is moderately rapid in the. surface layer and subsoil . Runoff is slow to medium, and hazard of erosion is moderate. This soil is used for timber , pasture , row crops , and urban development. 3 . Vegetation : The southerly one-third of the subject site is rela- tively clear, although there are a certain number of existing i • PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF MAY 3, 1977 PAGE TWO RE: DONALD L . LUEDKE REZONE REQUEST FROM G-7200 TO R-2 deciduous and evergreen trees . The remaining portion of the site is heavily wooded with many significant trees and vegetation typi - cal of Northwest woodlands . 4. Wildlife : The existing vegetation on the site provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 5. Water: Surface water or streams are not apparent on the site . 6 . Land Use : There is an existing small single family residence with an appurtenant structure located on the southerly one-third of the subject site. There are two single family residences that are located directly east of the subject site . There are other single family residences situated farther east toward Union Ave . N . E. The Brentwood single family residence subdivision is located south of the subject site across N. E . 12th Street. Several small dilapidated , single family residences and mobile homes are located directly west of the subject site to the powerline right-of-way . The area north of the site to Sunset Boulevard is generally heavily wooded and primarily undeveloped . F. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The area is a mixture of well -kept single family residences and small dilapidated or abandoned single family residences . It appears that the subject site is located at the juncture between the well -maintained single family area and the blighted single family area . A well estab- lished single family residence district As located across N . E . 12th Street south of the subject site. G . PUBLIC SERVICES: 1 . Water and Sewer: An 8" sewer line is located along N . E . 12th Street approximately 200 feet west of Union Avenue N . E . Also , an existing 8" sewer main is located at the corner of N . E . 11th Place and N . E . 12th Street. An 8" water main and a 12" storm sewer are located • along N . E . 12th Street . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements . Any future development on the site will be subject to City of Renton standards . 3. Transit: Metro Route No . 42 operates along N . E . 12th Street . 4 . Schools : The site is within the Renton School District and is within one-half mile of Honeydew Elementary , one-half mile from Sierra Heights Elementary , within one mile of McKnight Middle School , and within one mile of Hazen High School . 5 . Parks : The subject site is within one-half mile of Kiwanis Park and within one-half mile of a proposed County park west of Sierra Heights Elementary School . APPLICABLESECTIONSH. OF THE ZONING CODE: 1 . 4-725 , Amendments . 2 . 4-729 , G , General Classification District. 3. 4-708 , R-2 , Residence District. I . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS: 1 . Land Use Report , 1965 , page 17 , Objectives , numbers 1 , 2 , 4 , and 6 . i PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF MAY 3 , 1977 PAGE THREE RE : DONALD L . LUEDKE REZONE REQUEST FROM G-7200 TO R-2 2 . Policy Statement, Comprehensive Plan , Renton Urban Area , 1965 , page 4 , item 1 , The Neighborhood. J . IMPACTS ON NATURAL SYSTEMS: Rezoning of the subject property will not have a direct impact on the natural systems . However, eventual development of the site will dis- turb soil and vegetation , increase storm water runoff, and have an effect on traffic and noise levels in the area . K. SOCIAL IMPACTS: The subject request may result in a gradual upgrading of the existing blighted area , thereby creating positive social benefit. However, increased density on the subject site may cause additional social interaction with surrounding properties . L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended (RCW 43 . 216 ) , a Declara- tion of Non-significance has been issued for the subject proposal see attached ) . This is based upon proper development procedures and retention of as much of the natural character of the site within the ultimate development plan . M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: A vicinity map and site map. are attached. N. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 . City of Renton Building Division 2. City of Renton Engineering Division 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 4 . City of Renton Utilities Division 5 . City of Renton Fire Department The above departments approved the applications . Copies of memos from certain departments are attached. O. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1 , The request is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation of low density multiple family for the site and general area north of N . E . 12th Street and south of Sunset Boule- vard . 2. The subject site is situated between several substantial well -kept single family residences to the east and several residential struc- tures and mobile homes in rather poor condition to the west . This creates a difficult land use question , between creating a spot zone of R-2 within the existing single family residential zone and the possibility of stimulating the upgrading of not only the subject site but also the unsightly area west to the powerline right-of-way . It is the latter of these two questions that appears to be the more reasonable and appropriate for the subject site and area . 3. The R-2 zoning would allow either the subdivision of the subject property into 7200 square foot minimum lots for approximately two to three duplex residential structures or by special use per- mit approximately eight to ten townhouse type dwelling units . 4 . The site has an abundance of natural amenities including interest- ing topography , many significant trees , and much vegetation that should be incorporated into any site development plan . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF MAY 3 , 1977 PAGE FOUR RE : DONALD L . LUEDKE REZONE REQUEST FROM G-7200 TO R-2 5 . If the R-2 zoning is approved , adjacent single family residences should be protected from possible detrimental impacts through suitable setbacks , landscaping, and screening. 6 . The existing structures on the subject site may deter proper redevelopment of the site. P PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of R-2 rezone subject to the following conditions to be filed as restrictive covenants running with the land : 1 . EXISTING STRUCTURES The existing structures located on the subject site shall be removed from the site or remodeled to present Building Code requirements prior to commencement of any new construction . 2 . SETBACKS No building or structure shall be permitted within 30 feet of the south property line , within 30 feet of the east property line for the southerly 150 feet thereof, within 15 feet of the remaining portion along the east property line , and within 10 feet of the west property line. 3. LANDSCAPE PLANSICIAdetailedlandscape plan for the entire site development shall be submitted to and approved by the Renton Planning Department at the time of site development plan submittal . 4 . LANDSCAPE AREAS All setback areas except for ingress/egress location shall be suitably landscaped and approved by the Renton Planning Depart- ment . A suitable architectural type screening fence shall be incorporated into the landscaping along the east property line . • 5. SITE PRESERVATION Existing trees and vegetation shall be incorporated into the development plans as much as possible. Site clearing , selective tree cutting , and grading shall be permitted only in conformance with an approved site plan and specific Planning Department approval . 6 . STORM WATER RETENTION Storm drainage plans shall be submitted at the time of site development. Such plans shall include suitable on-site retention to provide for the same runoff rate for a 25-year storm period as is presently experienced on the site , together with suitable oil water separation facilities . 7 . DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31 , 2050 . It is further agreed and covenanted by the undersigned that , if a development plan is not submitted to the City of Renton pur- suant to these and other City requirements within two (2) years , and substantial construction begun within three (3 ) years of the filing of these covenants , and said construction and development diligently prosecuted toward completion thereafter, the zoning of said property shall without further City action revert back to to the zoning which existed prior to the filing of this document , and these covenants shall become null and void. The term "sub- stantial construction" shall mean the physical alteration of the land for construction pursuant to City approved development plans as per the above mentioned conditions and a valid building permit , PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF MAY 3, 1977 PAGE FIVE RE : DONALD L . LUEDKE REZONE REQUEST FROM G-7200 TO R-2 or construction of required utilities for such development. The above mentioned time periods may be extended for reasonable cause upon written request to and approval by the Renton Plan- ning Department . Such reasonable cause shall include , but may not be limited to , the requirement of an environmental impact statement pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 . The subject recommendation is consistent with the Land Use Plan , compatible with adjacent properties , and will serve to stimulate and upgrade a blighted area within the existing community . 4 Of PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTCjci:F4-1 BUILDING DIVISION 235 -2540A8 0 ...... MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 0 ° SE PI 42- April 12, 1977VI. CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR TO: Planning Department FROM: Building Division SUBJECT: Luedke Rezone We have no objections to rezone to R-2. II JCH/mp L.' C-°\ TN 71/A 3 V 1 G I ti ;' +ad ,.,.t_1....1 TL-,1FT • f ' 1 N y e I I am I 1 .'', 1. 1.. o 5C. J1/(/ y/ ee I 51+ 1 F ; s'' , se S,~ °, a'1'1 \II_I 'i{';39/ . ., . . Tu no es, , I r= __—._ li IT— -__— T- W G-L 00 N • z, a . T. I- P 11Q Dw n r I 1V34 s I1—..r]-.. Y.I ' 1 j i 7< . I , 11 I N_ `. _ , 4,•-e./e{.. \ ` d_I lA;1 730V. 1 1 1I kd a m 'HEWm •_:y,e:,,, e z e 'Y'' i I • I Ratak • . 11 11 I I ' ih s N© 3 4,„emeghei.i4 n I f 3I G.'is u 5 1 1 R_3 1 J, // ::::EpoR- 0 b L`- i Y 5...:) 5 1 1 1• bpIIrot ` WV 1 1 1 r I 1 _ i . T iolsl- ,I _ e!11 11>--___/ --_ - q -- ' I 4'13R-3 e:• . ; ;• . ;, :,,.. a R-3 1 1 IIM}T.r ( I N ' S-{- d d 1 • r 4 • 4 6 T' •~.®4 i•Tie L l+ l.l, • Z,--- 4 W e._ S®OQ z4. `0 ee1,.1r ,i 17' 7`O ± 05113111 .MOO a 3.'at.-3-1• o to li .. i_ N,E.1 Lf1iT. I ;, , : j. r , ll.z- ,.ire 1.[I 1.;.;,It t 1 . . . :1't l , -a51.. ..ii,. ... ' .1 I, N. t'' . TN S ._ nn ti r.— jI.+•r••. r •_ Q• MI JQ e, r '0• y'I. v.:,':. i,. i >T.• tit 4•. . s_ , m 44 r.V1 i ; ji * .fir, ym, .. _4./. R— y —r-1,,r,1 1,.,.....,:.,,. . , E! Z.Y s`, , ' e is•r1.... 4. - , a s_ _-..cT. o I - 1 - 1 s e: .,1 e e 1 I REZONE: 1 DONALD L . LUEDKE ; Appl . R-041-77 ; Rezone from G-7200 to R-2 ; property located at 3916 N . E. 12th Street. I APPLICANT DONALD L . LUEDKE TOTAL AREA ± . 9 acre PRINCIPAL ACCESS Shelton Ave. and N . E. 12th St . EXISTING ZONING G-7200 EXISTING USE Single Family Residence/Undeveloped PROPOSED USE Low Density Multi -family Residential I COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Low Density Multi -Family Residential COMMENTS i 1 1 e 1 I#oNNy cxesx• 0 c) \ Ri i, sc, 04,.... t T 41 F` G'fY LIMITS 0 2 I j AliJii OP filli IMP OMNI I e t ..... \ THIc 4°47I illie woeLIA \ 1 6pitMmOr. M I sF. 4542111.S.F.3 37 J! y s.f ly., Mew r I4C'J37103s13ed3E iit•E . /29- 57: Cf3 0 • ia no MI 3€35.F. a Irlj 1: 9 A 0407; At Per 4:3 CI 162 D tiiill ' gym RA• org ?L. tkt 1Q5 Wiiii e , s 0 0 D Dl . Do 0 ; Cl a 111 I a n 0 e '/r# Cr 4. U . o po00OOOZo 0 Na IT/ ,r. 0 %-\C1 n c k VOi r0tig0 1 5(4LE !'r Zoo' Sve.10orpro- _ poiLi4Lb L. L0ED ZEZONE: X-o .,-77 PROPOSED/FINAL ,T,- CLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE: )N-SIGNIFICANCE Application No . R-041-77 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-239-77 0 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Applicant requests rezone from G-7200 to R-2 to allow construction of low density multi -family dwellings in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan for the area . Proponent DONALD L . LUEDKE Location of Proposal 3916 N . E. 12th Street Lead Agency Renton Planning Department This proposal has been determined to 0 have Q not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS is is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was Imad a after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : 1 Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a ( proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official Gordon Y . Ericksen Title Planning Director Date April 26 . 1977 Signature % pp / ; c.City of Renton Planning_Department AFFIDAVIT I, 11nna1r1 T. T.ii d1 a $ SL'k'unal Ijle4kp being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me 4th April this 'a day of min 1977 , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at City of Renton Ze;1‘___ City of Renton Name of Notary Public) Signature of Owner) 3916 Northeast 12 Street, Renton Address.) Address) Washington City) State) WaGhi City) 276-7'108 Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulatio.n.s—o the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such ap f a,Fat nA_ FP\I El; I sC) r,.Date Received Cj/ , FBy. \ APR 5 1977 2- SC Renton Planning Dept . 1vG DEPP%.7 2-73 i_. ..EiI I [s :b, a• 1 ' esm^a+, 7 •( P? Rl is na; 3G: 1 a fl_ r o.—. 1 . 00 m' ' 1• kd 40`.,3, .rl`-` •T-,if•{ ';t'74—.7,0-- l rTo 7 rI I{NI Y ,+L; GH Tz 1 19 ?' I 11 • 3 -lalfi 1 T 5 } E{sir fi.Ft.' i7I 1..f,'.IO ,' z i"'i'i i x O Z[ cc j a 1 moiing.. _. 1S .x OI 3 N --,., P rr itI l I 4 ?fir•7•• •••1011:4,1:12sitlys. 1 i! D' — r r 1 r , 1S.u6r 3 N L . • b 1' s "Apt" y A t `I'07 1 ax• i s N JF G j r i. 1,li,.1,,i,,i,..;,.....;,.;:,: 7 F,1.-7.1,..!,, , 7 7/7441 a,_...,. L_ i., 7. Elm,...; j 4a 4 `axrI„ Z q,n® Illx •tio amita z000 o0O G / y i `. ,,.•r`( 1 m,,7j,c --i 1. Z__ j n la.0 w1 IaN G' I 9 , i I, l'. .. Y,L •.1 - .. P. .n4-, z' D x 1 iG 0-, 1' ®r1 la• •I '` i b J w.- u if wii I off 11 Y 1 YG Q or r I r .. . c x ?lin"e•'i•,rs MI IS Qm le Ni. I:. N 4 Q..• 411 U ZIr. 6Q Nor I zIF .a g2...8 )pi ,...,,,..,,, , _ ,,g i. 4 t p,,,, 11 11 z _ !:. .._: I17 n 1 , N:.......jrs <: s e : Ft' t fat tk 1 ._ 1- I D . fir { ii ' °111„I. ( 1 I Jut,....., , , „11I 'w• Vet 1 . r ' ' •le_i../ , CC a ,._ -. el: I Il I I 1 9 I i I rel N4NS cz 9 x r._x, x'r a im;•s„fm Ff ss' I xla-."'II 1 w:. e I 1 u' Ito", , • s 'e_ e9 iT it=' 1 i 111 ' a i.' m \ \ \ ate+'j s 111 1 I —''fff® - `F 3YJ 1.0 I r L L .AIE it 11 • '7 • t!I.' '1r I I L __. 9111 E?m® to- 1e 1,N - 1S ua Iix.l I II 1 ti f o 1 f YI©Wi• ](cam, 1 1--N4mK J1 G o 10 il w` N ,E c=E it s, 10 r, 1 - 1,, .Nt! , j v_ 2 S ,' ol ' .•lo,l7 e IYIL- ! 1 1' i•, m Ali I 8 I i ........„,„............, ....1)11 1 E 1 u _. lit,!. ' < =a ,' LP 2dV toI a. Ivo f-" sb M a.l' - •T, , ,m al_Ll a— a f0,15 3r F II' e i— 171 1 '1 I' 1 I O2aj , 1 3S tI F. f. ' s V i „ ool 3,tI 11 D••e, 35 , V Sr Cr ..----, 2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : NE 12 14 r- KGNTOE) , USA ggo65 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : EZctJ (MILL 'MCC G1 E -T UPON HaARIN6 E AM/NA-riOry APPROv 9. List of all permits, licenses or government approvals required for the proposal federal , state and local --including rezones) : fzg zoNE A PPLieA-TION 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: s,51 PLAN TO DEVELOP TO l.0W bENSiry A'1JLrti - rAMIE;y 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes , explain: ES THE. P1.CPG .TY ` ro -1-He EQ0 -1i-1 IS &EINI . [?ON9ibERL b 1 O('` A NNL'?eATt0r 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures?. YES MAYBE NO b) Disruptions, displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil? YES MAYBE NO c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features?a/ YES MAYBE N- d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? vi YES MMAYBE NO e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? YET— MAYBE NO f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation , deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? vi YE-f— MAYBE TO-- Explanation: CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON c\E; ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM i ,`` N 19/7 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ft' Application No. 4 -a - G' Environmental Checklist No. PROPOSED, date: FINAL, date: Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance Declaration of Non-Significance ® Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be . prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. . The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a. major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent DONALD - LUEt)KG 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: 3C1I6 - NE i9- fi= 5r, KE.N-rO N C1 c6 056 226 - 7 3055 3. Date Checklist submitted 4. Agency requiring Checklist RENTOtJ P LAN'\J IJi4- bE P 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : REZONE F-KoM 4 7200 TO 1Z 2. ( LOW 6ENsiTy MULTI FAMIL.y ) CON FOf;1'1ANe f= i O GoMPAC PLAN 4- 5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish. benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? q VE5 MAYBE N( b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? Ya- MAYBE NO d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? YES MAYBE 40 - Explanation: 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce snew light or glare? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? vi YET- MAYBE NO Explanation: PLAN TO DC\/E LOPE TO LOtf DENSrTy MULTI— AMILA/ Dv.IE i_LINGS 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? V YES MAYBE NO b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YES WAVE NO Explanation: 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including. but not limited to. oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? J YET- M YBE NO Explanation: 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location. distri- bution, density. or growth rate of the human population of an area? YES MAYBE ff Explanation: 3- 2) Air. Will the proposal result in: a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? V Y MAYBE NO b) The creation of objectionable odors? V( YES MAYBE NU— c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? f YES M YBE NO b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? YES MAYBE NO c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? YES MAYBE NO d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? YES MAYBE NO e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? J YES MAYBE N- f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters?u/ YES MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE NO h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? YES MAYBE NO i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? Y MAYBE Explanation: 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass , crops , microflora and aquatic plants)? YES MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? ES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? YET— MAYBE NO d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? DES MAYBE NO Explanation: 6 d) Sewer or septic tanks? YES ft-A-7BE NO e) Storm water drainage? YES MAYBE NO f) Solid waste and' disposal ? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: SWOJ seuiGI ( 200 PT. ) E( T1 f'i , TO SE;AVE: PROPER-Tye oO FT . E .OM 3ToIM WA-rtK r R.AlNAcC 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? bl YES— MAYBE NO Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of anaesthetically offensive site open to public view? YES MAYBE NO Explanation; 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure,, object or building? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: III . SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the, lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: l signed) name printed) City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 i 5- 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: WILL MAKE MO G (HOUSiN(1„ A-VAILA t^C 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a) Generation of additional vehicular movement?vi YES MAYBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities,• or demand for new parking? YES MAYBE NO c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? YE MMATITE N d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? YES MAYBE NO e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? YES MAYBE NO f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? YES MAYBE N0 Explanation: 14) Public' Services. Will the proposal have, an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? YES MAYBE NO b) Police protection? YES ANT YYBE NO c) Schools? YES MAYBE NO d) Parks or other recreational facilities? YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services? YES MAMAAYBE NO Explanation: 15) Energy. Will the proposal result, in : a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? c/ YES MA B PBO b) Demand upon existing sources of energy., or require the development of new sources of energy? YET— MAYBE 0‘..- Explanation: 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need, for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities : a) Power or natural gas? YES MMTV1TE NO b) Communications systems? YES MAYBE NO c) Water? YES MAYBE NO z THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT0 4lr 0 P 235-2550 0 SFglt April 21 , 1977 Donald L. Luedke 3916 N. E. 12th St. x Renton , WA 98055 Dear Mr. Luedke : RE : NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR REZONE APPLICATION R-041-77 Gertlenen : The Renton Planning Department formallyacceptedabovementionedapplicationonApril5 , 1977 the A s pu=tic hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examinerhasbeensetfor9:00 AM, May 3, 1977 Representatives of the applicant are asked to be pre-sert. All interested persons are invited to attend thehearing . If you have any further questions , please calltheRentonPlanningDepartment , 235-2550. Very truly yours ; .. Gordon Y. Ericksen Planning Director By: Mi ael L. Smit Associate Planner wr NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON , WASHINGTON, ON MAY 3, 19 77 , AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . APPLICATION FOR FINAL PLAT APPROVAL ; file No . FP-040-77 ; property located south of Puget Drive S . E . and east of the Benson Hill Apartments between Bonneville Power Transmission Line Right-of-way and Aberdeen Place S . E. 2 . REZONE FROM G-7200 TO R-2 ; file No . R-041-77 ; property located at 3916 N . E. 12th Street . 3 . SITE APPROVAL IN M-P ZONE; file No . SA-043-77 ;. property located at 550 S. W. 7th St. Legal descriptions of applications noted above on file in Renton Planning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON MAY 3, 1977 AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . GORDON Y. ERICKSEN PUBLISHED April 24 , 1977 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I ,i Michael L. Smith HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW . ATTEST: 'Subscribed and sworn 4/1ftobeforeme, . a.. Notary Public, on the 2istday of . April 19 77 !_. .SIGNED ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO : Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department Public Works Department Building Div. Traffic Engineering Div. Engineering Div. Utilities Engineering Div. FROM: Planning Department, (signed by responsible official or his desi gnee) SUBJECT : Review of ECF- 239— ?7_ .;. .App.lication No . : i O4/-77 Action Name : Dom4,I,/ Lue.411ei es tirowt -71.040 4 it-z. Please review the attached . Review requested by (date) : 4 ,17 7 REVIEW BY ! OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS': i.°' Department :LAC Comments : Signatur• t Director or Autho ized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : att..1 4 -s . 1 Comments :pi,4444 S'yw y,z, /(t rfri) 4) Al- & e 76A1/ e'D/45 ri rev p&awt. CAA 760e. G.'ced G .re s k1 ie4 /1( Z A LL c//=F Ypre asil .r Rep#If drao fC TL-A,,...4 Signature of Di rectial or Authori zed Representative Date 6-76 OVER) REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department :c1/c -/1/ r Comments : t,/, 3./7/A- Tp/e26-71' 3/77 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments :6 ki Signature of Directo-r or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW Y OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : 1 Department : Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date I INTERDEPARTMENTAL REVIEW REQUEST TO : PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR BUILDING DIVISION ENGINEERING DIVISION ,' TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION X /UTILITIES DIVISION .0 71;q' FIRE DEPARTMENT HEALTH DEPARTMENT FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT gic•iakef <Auk Contact Person R E : wail LVecIke. • re •Xvo 4-'7zp0 atzR- igiwyfr g-494/-77 Please review the attached information regarding the subject proposal and return it to the Planning Department by with your written recommendation . Your response will be included as part of the staff report to the Hearing Examiner. Thank you , PLANNING DEPARTMENT Date I 1 4 OF v V•?}3— PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT U 1 2 BUILDING DIVISION 235-2540L'Airif<moo rn MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o 04T6-0 SEPi -• April 12, 1977 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR TO: Planning Department FROM: Building Division SUBJECT: Luedke Rezone We have no objections to rezone to R-2. C ' JCH/mp U RENT0 if Ack1, APR PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING MAY 3 , 1977 APPLICANT: DONALD L. LUEDKE FILE NO, : R-041-77 ; REZONE REQUEST FROM G-7200 , GENERAL CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT, TO R-2 , RESIDENCE DISTRICT A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests rezone from G-7200 to R-2 to allow construction of low density multi -family dwellings in conformance with the Compre- hensive Plan for the area . B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1 . Owner of Record : DONALD L . LUEDKE 2 . Applicant : DONALD L . LUEDKE 3 . Location : 3916 N. E . 12th Street 4 . Legal Description : Detailed legal description available on file in the Renton Planning Department . 5 . Size of Property : Approximately . 9 acres . 6 . Access : Via N. E . 12th Street. 7 . Existing Zone : G-7200 . 8 . Existing Zoning G-7200 , General Classification District , i.n Area : Single Family Residence ; B-1 , Business District. 9. Comprehensive Low Density Multiple Family Residential Land Use Plan : 10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance . C. PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Subject rezone request to R-2 zoning is to allow future development as per R-2 standards . D. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject site was annexed to the City on April 27 , 19.67 , by Ordinance No . 2323 . The G-7200 zone corresponds to the previous County zoning designation prior to annexation . E. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography : The site is relatively level with a slight rise near the middle of the property . 2 . Soils : Alderwood (AgC) . Permeability is moderately rapid in the. surface layer and subsoil . Runoff is slow to medium, and hazard of erosion is moderate. This soil is used for timber , pasture , row crops , and urban development. 3 . Vegetation : The southerly one-third of the subject site is rela- tively clear, although there are a certain number of existing PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF MAY 3, 1977 PAGE TWO RE : DONALD L . LUEDKE REZONE REQUEST FROM G-7200 TO R-2 deciduous and evergreen trees . The remaining portion of the site is heavily wooded with many significant trees and vegetation typi - cal of Northwest woodlands . 4. Wildlife : The existing vegetation on the site provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 5. Water: Surface water or streams are not apparent on the site . 6 . Land Use : There is an existing small single family residence with an appurtenant structure located on the southerly one-third of the subject site. There are two single family residences that are located directly east of the subject site . There are other single family residences situated farther east toward Union Ave . N . E. The Brentwood single family residence subdivision is located south of the subject site across N. E . 12th Street. Several small dilapidated, single family residences and mobile homes are located directly west of the subject site to the powerline right-of-way. The area north of the site to Sunset Boulevard is generally heavily wooded and primarily undeveloped . F. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The area is a mixture of well -kept single family residences and small dilapidated or abandoned single family residences . It appears that the subject site is located at the juncture between the well -maintained single family area and the blighted single family area . A well estab- lished single family residence district Is located across N . E . 12th Street south of the subject site. G. PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer: An 8" sewer line is located along N . E . 12th Street approximately 200 feet west of Union Avenue N . E . Also , an existing 8" sewer main is located at the corner of N . E . 11th Place and N . E . 12th Street . An 8" water main and a 12" storm sewer are located • along N . E . 12th Street. 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements . Any future development on the site will be subject to City of Renton standards . 3. Transit: Metro Route No . 42 operates along N . E . 12th Street . 4 . Schools : The site is within the Renton School District and is within one-half mile of Honeydew Elementary , one-half mile from Sierra Heights Elementary , within one mile of McKnight Middle School , and within one mile of Hazen High School . 5 . Parks : The subject site is within one-half mile of Kiwanis Park and within one-half mile of a proposed County park west of Sierra Heights Elementary School . 11. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1 . 4-725 , Amendments . 2 . 4-729 , G , General Classification District. 3 . 4-708 , R-2 , Residence District. I . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS: 1 . Land Use Report , 1965 , page 17 , Objectives , numbers 1 , 2 , 4 , and 6 . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF MAY 3 , 1977 PAGE THREE RE : DONALD L . LUEDKE REZONE REQUEST FROM G-7200 TO R-2 2 . Policy Statement, Comprehensive Plan , Renton Urban Area , 1965 , page 4 , item 1 , The Neighborhood . J . IMPACTS ON NATURAL SYSTEMS : Rezoning of the subject property will not have a direct impact on the natural systems . However, eventual development of the site will dis- turb soil and vegetation , increase storm water runoff, and have an effect on traffic and noise levels in the area . K. SOCIAL IMPACTS: The subject request may result in a gradual upgrading of the existing blighted area , thereby creating positive social benefit. However, increased density on the subject site may cause additional social interaction with surrounding properties . L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended (RCW 43 . 216 ) , a Declara- tion of Non-significance has been issued for the subject proposal see attached ) . This is based upon proper development procedures and retention of as much of the natural character of the site within the ultimate development plan . M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: A vicinity map and site map. are attached. N. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 . City of Renton Building Division 2. City of Renton Engineering Division 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 4 . City of Renton Utilities Division 5 . City of Renton Fire Department The above departments approved the applications . Copies of memos from certain departments are attached . O. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1 , The request is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation of low density multiple family for the site and general area north of N . E . 12th Street and south of Sunset Boule- vard . 2. The subject site is situated between several substantial well -kept single family residences to the east and several residential struc- tures and mobile homes in rather poor condition to the west . This creates a difficult land use question , between creating a spot zone of R-2 within the existing single family residential zone and the possibility of stimulating the upgrading of not only the subject site but also the unsightly area west to the powerline right-of-way . It is the latter of these two questions that appears to be the more reasonable and appropriate for the subject site and area . 3. The R-2 zoning would allow either the subdivision of the subject property into 7200 square foot minimum lots for approximately two to three duplex residential structures or by special use per- mit approximately eight to ten townhouse type dwelling units . 4 . The site has an abundance of natural amenities including interest- ing topography , many significant trees , and much vegetation that should be incorporated into any site development plan . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF MAY 3 , 1977 PAGE FOUR RE : DONALD L . LUEDKE REZONE REQUEST FROM G-7200 TO R-2 5 . If the R-2 zoning is approved , adjacent single family residences should be protected from possible detrimental impacts through suitable setbacks , landscaping, and screening. 6 . The existing structures on the subject site may deter proper redevelopment of the site. P. PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of R-2 rezone subject to the following conditions to be filed as restrictive covenants running with the land : 1 . EXISTING STRUCTURES The existing structures located on the subject site shall be removed from the site or remodeled to present Building Code requirements prior to commencement of any new construction . 2 . SETBACKS No building or structure shall be permitted within 30 feet of the south property line , within 30 feet of the east property line for the southerly 150 feet thereof, within 15 feet of the remaining portion along the east property line , and within 10 feet of the west property line. 3. LANDSCAPE PLANS A detailed landscape plan for the entire site development shall be submitted to and approved by the Renton Planning Department at the time of site development plan submittal . 4 . LANDSCAPE AREAS All setback areas except for ingress/egress location shall be suitably landscaped and approved by the Renton Planning Depart- ment . A suitable architectural type screening fence shall be incorporated into the landscaping along the east, property line . • 5. SITE PRESERVATION Existing trees and vegetation shall be incorporated into the development plans as much as possible. Site clearing , selective tree cutting , and grading shall be permitted only in conformance with an approved site plan and specific Planning Department approval . 6 . STORM WATER RETENTION Storm drainage plans shall be submitted at the time of site development. Such plans shall include suitable on-site retention to provide for the same runoff rate for a 25-year storm period as is presently experienced on the site , together with suitable oil water separation facilities . 7 . DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31 , 2050 . It is further agreed and covenanted by the undersigned that , if a development plan is not submitted to the City of Renton pur- suant to these and other City requirements within two ( 2) years , and substantial construction begun within three (3 ) years of the filing of these covenants , and said construction and development diligently prosecuted toward completion thereafter, the zoning of said property shall without further City action revert back to to the zoning which existed prior to the filing of this document , and these covenants shall become null and void . The term "sub- stantial construction" shall mean .the physical alteration of the land for construction pursuant to City approved development plans as per the above mentioned conditions and a valid building permit , PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF MAY 3, 1977 PAGE FIVE RE : DONALD L . LUEDKE REZONE REQUEST FROM G-7200 TO R-2 or construction of required utilities for such development. The above mentioned time periods may be extended for reasonable cause upon written request to and approval by the Renton Plan- ning Department . Such reasonable cause shall include , but may not be limited to , the requirement of an environmental impact statement pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 . The subject recommendation is consistent with the Land Use Plan , compatible with adjacent properties , and will serve to stimulate and upgrade a blighted area within the existing community. 4 OF v U sly; y J PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION 235 -2540 O MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 0• Q- qpf0 SEPZEw April 12, 1977 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR TO: Planning Department FROM: Building Division SUBJECT: Luedke Rezone We have no objections to rezone to R-2. L' / i JCH/mp iVS \ 1t i CJ 1i rY Li.i i I l`i, If i71 . „ t i-- I- - . I eY: ;,• , .1,, d'Io.' ,I- ). .„w" I I Gm qJi • WaI• 105E Q 51. I• isx.la 1 4=1........ t--- il Mr 11110 G-1t/00 t ',- II 4 4 , 49/ xi- p I U, n . 8. S Y FFF... 1 N 1' 1 \PM.," 57 - m zS I Cqi IN - 1 1 S6'rti r ii. E2 •W 4 `,Sf r.,.la/ B se 6 ` 1 I i11 L1s m' e '.?-1 _ ( 'I, I __ a- f 2`9.-5 aeeea:'ceT„ N 1 R-31G '1 ---L._ uEl ::. .:::::::::::::::::N 1'- : J r' R: : : i a! . i ri y I 1 IIyri L .-L- o.r=r al I____ 4 - b.. .- d114 I 1- - R3fit • - .1 I ll II. R-3 i rill Iriffil Mi.!el J1' !, HEITNP J•{m '- J kc al i0 660 0© igIn=Ai l;) s. I E - .. .- 1J 1 I` w N.E M. • V/0 Ya'Wn.••n . 1 IITI aT. ,, .. i_. .. ... i. (j . l' n 'I -N 1 . 3-14 a Ipli 1 la a q'< J T ' - `f"IrLIA z '. '„jr >.i. : WI, 1 1 nor . I i 14 ; ra 1 I W Div oo dzf z 1 i ° r.° . ,' z, N.E ` qr J,,/I, p d„© 5 •a L ,.Y:,,''•. I,, 10 II 1 I I I W a, ga j r / ! 1153A a©©a i- O . D ,. H E.IQ,M r. - - _ - 1_aI t,. ,. •1 Y, m 1 F Vl ile.I,__ -•- II 1 _. W t. t„, >.;,:c;c7,1.1. k;q Itlyp giA, • N.EE 10 N ST.u 1 , J.. 5 I' 1 1' ' 4i1.I,.147,:1:I ° r-4-tf, ' 0 _. 1° a I t 41, 45 :°P 7z r1,r'LC:i• H e EiiI. 7", I n it v t P a4 V kTilirii 1'1 T.i : tYV I . , . .a , 1- a '... a ri 1 r-- I. - I 6 E e,)J REZONE: DONALD L . LUEDKE ; Appl . R-041-77 ; Rezone from G-7200 to R-2 ; property located at 3916 N . E . 12th Street. APPLICANT DONALD L . LUEDKE TOTAL AREA ± . 9 acre PRINCIPAL ACCESS Shelton Ave. and N . E. 12th St . EXISTING ZONING G-7200 EXISTING USE Single Family Residence/Undeveloped PROPOSED USE Low Density Multi -family Residential COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Low Density Multi -Family Residential COMMENTS 1 1 s s i 0 l#owwy crufie C1 \ El 4, kw., :.t 4: r sv u i aeon tis T i1 d? I L1GINLIMI I 1 e o 1 t- 1 t 7.4% I i ammt4heffsase two leo 1-11 40,0 wil ira s6Tl Dx I II 3 f' 11 ‘ \ s.F. 61.6. Um AE ss i 114-E 71a37ems" 1 i 3g I F. S.F. me 10WOMBseal13"4111 lifill N•E • /ZTih 5T c2 0 I a le o, 4215'r' GB 0 n A 0A,,t7; it721,,,, "Vj 30 AD 116 u ` 00-1i* 3i KA° Iraq n. js A OW lBDopo 00 Cl0zaoo n p v Na /Iraqer 0 a 0 a 0 S® o0 ° a 0 Na Iv ,r: o 01g 'r0 1 eioli.e I"200' S0&Je rs'ft pOIAc.a L. LUEDX,t 16ZWJJ: E-0.4./-77 PROPOSED/FINAL CLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE __JN-SIGNIFICANCE Application No. R-041-77 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-239-77 JJ FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Applicant requests rezone from G-7200 to R-2 to allow construction of low density multi -family dwellings in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan for the area . Proponent DONALD L . LUEDKE Location of Proposal 3916 N . E. 12th Street Lead Agency Renton Planning Department This proposal has been determined to have 0 not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS is x is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) (c ) . This decision was ma a after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final )declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official Gordon Y. Ericksen Title Planning Director Date April 26 , 1977 Signature Alden/ 1 l • . 4 City of Renton Planning_Department