Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA79-3124,461 1110 ;Mr rf• Air ek%) ,q se and w h # rA ,// P bc,v.ale acc e55 fo /7e w be n, e Loy A,'hq A/o h iA y71 4 oN 4,4, 4a7 ' al 'S g6i.7/ .'/y sole-'d f 'Jr Pk • 'w 1 i ii - I...#4 PIN 4 1 i, 1 I. y w f IP. 111?"14/ 6P;' - 111, eX;S7e, ffo(SC ahQ/ // D ;fre, u. cti '. // ,Q,0,- ci f 4CCP55 to /ie - oh/( oc k,e), Sau lch, ldrc)/-4 PrQpo5 e Q i'Q a- d.,I. f- Q,Y N a p r 1? TA. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 200 Mill Avenue South 0 - Renton, Washington 98055 0, 9grf0 SEPT''''- RECEIVED RECEIVED CITY OF RENTONEN-HINT 7 HEARING EXAMINER V '' MAR 2 01979 ITEM .NOfL3/,--2-----72,-,------ AM PM 718t9110111o121112s 9s4o5,6 A rl 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of theastheextentofthelandareaaffectedbyanyenvironmental impacts ,aiiincluding s well• y any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of tho a „ir-.-' imentalsettingoftheproposal ) : 1.The sites nnly hy epresentlybeingusednn house....which' x 4 has a . garage and other out buildings, ' whici are now_located on aproximatly one half of the land. The driv :waY...now being used to the garage will he used by the cenend 1nt. 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : aproximatly one year 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposalfederal , state and local --including rezones) : • R ezon Shnrtpl t SPtra mp p Py try R l , g permit y b 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity c ,related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain,: No 11 . Do you know of .an y plans by others which may affect the property covered byyourproposal ? If yes , exp.l.ain : No 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro •posal ; if none has been completed , but is expected to be filed at some futuredate , describe the nature of such application .form: Shortplat, Sewpgp permit, Building permit i@ i iD f I . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS • Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1 ) Earth. Will the proposal result in :i a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologicsubstructures? i YES MAYBE NO b) Disruptions , displacements., compaction or over- t covering of the soil ? X i YES MAYBE NO c) Change in topography or ground surface relief i features? X 0 YES MAYBE. AU— d) The destruction, covering or modification of anyuniquegeologicorphysicalfeatures? X YES MAYBE N0 AIJ( e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , leitheronoroffthesite? X 1 YES— MAYBE NO if)(f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes An siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the • 1bedoftheoceanor -any bay, inlet or lake? X Explanation: MAYBES, iThprPwillbe' a house built on the lot. Ir 1. i t 3 2) Air. Will the proposal result in: a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? Try MAYBE NO b) The creation of objectionable odors? YE MAYBE NOS c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? x YES .. MAYBE NO Explanation: 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? YES MAYBE NO b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? YES MAYBE NO c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? YES MAYBE N O d). Change in the amount of surface water in any water, body?• y€$ MAYBE NO e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X YES MAYBE NO f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X. E - MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? x YES ' MAYBE NO h), Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection , or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus• or bacteria , or other substances into the ground waters? ES MAYBE NO i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies?YET' MAYBE N Explanation: There will he anothPr home nn thQ prnperty II i 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: I i a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass , crops , mlcroflora and aquatic plants)? Y XI b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? YES'" MAYBE WU- c) Introduction of new species of flora' into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? YEB MAYBE N0 d) Reduction in acreage of any 'agricultura.l crop? YESMAYT3€ Explanation: Some clearing will be dine for the ho'Ge 4j.I". 5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: a) . Changes in- the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals includingreptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? YES .'MAYBE. , b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area , or result in a barrier to the migration or movementoffauna? YES MAYBE -ta-- d) Deterioration to existing fish 'or wildlife habitat? X YET7 FATEIT tiro Explanation: 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? YES .MAYBE NOMA Explanation: tt 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or j glare? X YET" MAYBE Ab— Explana'tion: 8) Land Use.. • Will the proposal result in the alteration of thepresentorplannedlanduse 'of an area? X YES MAYBE NU— Explanation: One arlitiranal home will be built. 9) Natural Resources. Will the ro osal resultP in: a) Increase in .the rate of use of any natural resources? X fI YES MAYBE NO I b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YES MAYBE NO' t1.Explanation: IR is 11 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including,but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) fintheeventofanaccidentorupsetconditions? • YET- MAYBE Nb Explanation: S I IF, 11 i 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- sbution, density, or growth rate of the human population 11ofanarea? X YE MAYBE A6— d ' fi T- 1 Explanation:There will be one aditional family on the property. I• i J 5- , is 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? AS MAYBE NO Explanation: There will hP nnP aditinnal home, which_wilL____ help with a shortage of housing. 13) Transportation/Circulation: Will the proposal • result in : a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X YES M YBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new" parking? YES BE NOMMAY c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X YES MAYBE NU d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods,? YES— MAYBE NO e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? YES YBE NOMMA f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? YES' MAYBE O Explanation: There will be transportation to and from the house , for one. aditional family. 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or result in a need for new or altered governmental services IF in any of the following areas : I{ a) Fire protection? YES MAYBE ' NU— j b) Police protection? YES MAYBE•N P c) Schools? X YES MAYBE NO d) Parks or other recreational facilities? X YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? X YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services? YES MAYBE NO• Explanation: •Ond adi tional family may have a slight effect upon the above governmental services. 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? YES MAYBE NO b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy?" X YES MAYBE N1 Explanation: Tha nne arlitional family will have a need .for a i small amount of energy. 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems , or alterations to the following utilities : a) ,Power or natural gas? YES MAYBE NO b) Communications systems? YES MAYBE NO c) Water? YES MAYBE NO d) Sewer or septic tanks? YF r;` s S MAYBE NO e) Storm water drainage? X' Y S MAYBE NO f) Solid waste and disposal? YtS MAYBE NO Explanation: —.The.—house will be on P septic• system of its own. ThPrc will also he a need for solid waste disposal for nne aditinnal family. 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of . any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? YES M AYB-E N Explanation: 18) • Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public , or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X TES MAYBE NO Explanation: _ 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality o_r quantity. of existing recreational opportunities?Yam- MAYBE N Explanation: 20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure , object or building? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my .knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of. non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full discllloossure on my part. Proponent: i/ . 71,. .aGti signed). Steven MA Whitson name printed) City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 CITY OF RENTON REN.T z RE7ONE APPLICATION FOR !OFFICE USE ONLY LAND USE HEARINd,!Q 0 91 z APPLICATION NO. 03/02 - 79 EXAMINER 'S ACTI C•Lrr APPLICATION. FEE $ a_.p • APPEAL FILED J,• RECEIPT NO. d /01- / CITY . COUNCIL ACTI ..-1, . . FILING DATE ao7"ORDINANCE NO. AND DATE HEARING DATE APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 10 : 1 . Name S',t.Pven M. Whitson Phone 883-4445 Address 1817 130th N.E. Bellevue Wa. 9a005 3. Property petitioned for rezoning is located on N.E. 7th St. between Monroe Ave. N.E. and Queen Ave,. N.E. 4 . 'Square footage or acreage of property 28,?00 sq ft 5 . 'Legal description of property (if more •space is required, attach a separate sheet) Lot 10, in Block 1, of S:tewartts Highland Acr Tract, as per plat recorded in Volume 43 of Plats, on page 17, records of -King County Washington 6 . Existing Zoning G 1 Zoning Requested R 1 NOTE TO APPLICANT: The following factors are considered in reclassifying property. Evidence or .additional information to substantiate your request may be attached to this sheet. (See Application Procedure Sheet for specific requirements . ) Submit this form in duplicate. 7. 'Proposed use of site Building site for single family home 8. List the measures to be taken to reduce impact on the surrounding area. Many trees -are bordering the_proparty 9. How soon after the rezone is granted do you intend to develop the site? Aprox one year 10. .Two copies of plot plan and affidavit of ownership are required. Planning Dept. 1-77 1 KloIghff@o 0 RECEIVE®2 Ci1%' OF RENT March 16,1979 HEARING EXAMINER El To: Renton Hearing Examiner AM MAR 1979 718r9sI0,9&PI21 fl 1211415Subject; Steven Whitson Rezone (R-312-79) On behalf of my neighbors and myself, we wish to express our M opposition to the above noted rezone . We are opposed to this rezone because of the long-term detrimental effects on our neighborhood. If allowed, this Id rezone will remove any hopes that we have of maintaining our area in it's present state. cn Contrary to the Planning Department report, this area is not in a state of transition to smaller lots . We have in the past resisted efforts to increase the density of buildings in this g area. The most recent effort to rezone and sub-divide was the II attempt by Harold P. Peterson (R-882-76) . This is a very unique area, an area that was developed according to the existing zoning. The Planning Department makes referencegl to the smaller lots surrounding the Stewart' s Highland Acre Tracts, the proposal remains compatible with the established single family residential character surrounding the Highland Acre Tract O which this is a part" (Pg. 3 #2 ) , this is exactly what we are opposed to, becoming just like the rest of the area. It is interesting to note that the surrounding area was not developed according to the zoning at the time. In many cases , 1640 this area was developed in violation of the building codes Til including insufficient water and sewer mains and narrow streets . Problems that are still with us today simply because of o0 economic exploitation. I We feel that this is a very special area and that is the reason c we have chosen to live here . The majority of homeowners have C) been here since the area was developed. In fact, to be able to 0 purchase a home here, it almost requires that the present ownership be relinquished involuntarily, as in death. Many of the homeowners built their homes with their hands, sweat and sacrifice and intend to remain until their death. 00 Each of us has the opportunity to sell our property at a g tremendous profit because of the uniqueness and the size of lai the lots. We are not interested in profits, but remaining here albecausewetreasurewhatwehave. RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON EXHIBIT N O. 5 HEARING EXAMINER KIi 2 01979 ITEM I ®. ,. -5 /a - 77AMPM 0 AVA I J B IQy1I P 1 1 , uvu LJ 00 Steven Whitson Rezone Page Two On September 8,1976, the Planning Commission ruled that the Harold P. Peterson rezone would be detrimental to this area and denied the rezone. The City Council sustained this decision by denying the appeal to this decision on October 18, 1976 for the same reason. Only the dates and names have changed, the Steven Whitson Rezone would be just as detrimental if not more so. We urge that in the interest of fairness and consistency 0 you deny this request . 0 n 0 SXely, Michael L. Smith and my nei hbors . 0 c I 00 n Attachment: Listing of affected parties .0 00 0 clE1‘ _NED March 13,1979 1() MAR 19 1979 To: Renton Hearing Examiner 1VG We, the undersigned are opposed to the Stephen Whitson rezone from GSL1 to R-1 . This rezone would have an extreme adverse effect on the surrounding properties and is not in the best interests of the community. NAME ADDRESS 71/11 ,;134,1 1572 Alb: 7lirNsm. 3W3 N 'E-7 Sz ,e&t.X,„ Ai-0,(7 3 c E TIT sT ICY.J4,- ---)-•"- 4, Yrza,42.)i) 7 . 7J-14/4-I 0A2-Zzi 374-L3 3 3 61 /(7: E 3606 Al/..5. 5t. 64 9 ec7 51 777 71'7; t A L;) 1-)/_ I A/1--= s-3. ko-,t-L4 3 17 6. 7 e e. p 61 4 • . e.- Stephen Whitson Rezone .tkaptR le 1919 NAME ADDRESS f.„ 3:57 P c/7,4) , 7 -1)-6.. i 21-1- 1 il . Transamerica •r ! Transamerica Title Insurance Company Title Insurance Services Please address correspondence to the office checked below: MAIN AUBURN BALLARD BELLEVUE • BOTHELL FEDERAL WAY ISSAOUAH KENT Park Place ''230 Auburn Way So. 6700 15th Ave.N.W. 10635 N.E.8th St. 17524 Bothell Way N.E. 33427 Pacific Hwy So. 1595 N.W.Oilman Blvd. 524 Wes WA 98031 t Meeker#2 6th SAevattle,WA 810 St. Auburn,B9-2566 2 Seattle, 0 28-4610 7 B Box 1493 ellevue,WA 98009 Bothell,( 206)28-46061 Faders'( 206)1538-3411, WA 3 Issaquah,628-46 0 WA 027 _ Kent,5 2-8634 206)628-4676 206)28-4661 Rob er t s , Anderson & Jackson, NORTH AURORA REDMOND RENTON WEDOWOOD WEST SEATTLE 902 North 185th St. 16625 Redmond Way 222 Williams Ave.S. 8206 35th Ave.N.E. 4450 Calif.Ave.S.W. Attorneys at "Law Seattle,WA 98133 Redmond,WA 98052 Renton,WA 98055 Seattle,WA 98115 Seattle,WA 98116 206)628-4600 (208)626-4604 (208)628.4625 (206)628-4620, (206)628-4615 111 Williams Ave. Renton , WA• J Your Order No. Our Order No. 427793 1- ATTN: Alice Smalley. - Whitson : a . PRELIMINARY COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE.• ., Washington Land Title Association Form Amount Premium Sales Tax Total Owner's standard coverage yj Purchaser's standard.coverage " 54, 000. 00 244.50 13 . 20 257 . 70 Mortgagee's standard coverage Mortgagee's ALTA coverage Tax Registration Total Date:September 21, 1978 at 8 :00 , a.m. 257 .70 TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY agrees to issue on request and on recording of'any appropriate documents, its policy or policies as applied for,with coverage as indicated, based on this pre.'.'liminary commitment that title to the property described herein is.vested on the date shown above-:in'- HARLEY J. SMALLEY Jr. and BERNICE T. SMALLEY, his wife; subject only to the exceptions shown herein and the terms, conditions and exceptions contained in the policy form. This report and commitment shall have no force or effect e7 t as a basis for the coverage specified herein. Byf//L44 . Description: Lot 10, in Block 1, of Stewart's on Highhlan17d AcreecTract,as per King C plat aty, recorded in Volume 43 of Plats ,page Washington; Situate in the County of King, State of Washington continued - NOTE:1.Investigation should be made to determine if there are any service,installation, maintenance, or construction charges for sewer,water or electricity. 2.In the event this transaction fails to close, a cancellation fee will be charged for services 3-..,.a :- „-,n'.1.,,,r,,,u4th our rate schedule. J 2 ek1Page Order No. 427793 EXCEPTIONS : A. 1% Excise Tax if unpaid. B. Second half of general taxes for 1978 in the sum of' $210.24 Tax Account No. 801110-0050-07) NOTE: Sale of this property to a taxpayer not entitled to an exempt status may result in disallowance of the exemption for all or part of the current year. 1. Reservations contained in. deed from the Northern Pacific Railroad Company to dated May 5 , 1954 . recorded May28 , 1954 under Auditor' s File No. 4450143 as follows : Reserving and excepting from said lands so much or such portions thereof as are or may be mineral lands or contain coal or iron, and also the use and the right and title to the use- of such surface ground as may be necessary for mining operations and the right of access to such reserved and excepted mineral lands, including lands containing coal or iron for the purpose of exploring, developing and working the same. 2. Restrictive covenants and slope rights , as disclosed by the plat of Stewart's Highland Acre Tract. 3. r MORTGAGE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Mortgagor : Harley J. Smalley and Bernice T. Smalley, his wife; Mortgagee: Roberts , Anderson and Jackson, attorneys at law, and Luvera & Mullen, attorneys at law; Amount: 38 ,000.00 Dated: April 4, 1978 Recorded: April 7 , 1978 Recording No. : 780407-0672 bw/RWC,pc. I •I f 7 \ kql.It J . I L.` a. . 1\ \'' i ' TRACTS Ac`u 1 THE NORTH V2 OF THE N.W I/4•OF THE S.E.I/4 OF SECTION9. T.23N. R5E.W.M. MOVEHB[N.IOaP SCALE=II WGHa ID0R[T ROT 3.3TORfY caYY[RORSa• Ll / t•-PLAT•T E III n DESCRIPTION1111111111111112:THIS PLAT OF!?[WART•f N1611LAND AGRE ?RAG7!COVERS AND INCLUDES ALL 0/Dy.."'a TKf NOUTH SIALE OFTHC NORTHWEST QUARTER OI IN[SO UINFAST GUAR TER OF$FGT- 1. Ta A." IONS.TOWASN11y NORTH.RANGE 6 CAST.W.Mi[ACEPT COUNTY ROAD. h MON-UMENTS ARE Or GONG RC 7E EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE DESIGNATED. RSE3 AND LUMENS iONS ARE AS SHOWN ON THE FACE Or Ii PLAT.ALL YN- • f• s DEDICATION S D KNOW ALL YEN RT THESE PRESENTS THAT WE.TIE UNO[RSI GEED,R.L.67E WAR TAND N J 111111111111/11.::JUA NI TA STEWART.HIS WIFE.OWNER IN FEE SIMPLE OF THE'LANO HEREBY PLATTED.MEXABY DECLAR[THISPLAY.AIDDEDICATETO THEUS[OFTHEIVOLICFOREVER4LLsly ' STREETSANDAVENVESUKOWNHEREON.ANDTIEUSETHEREOFFORALL URLICPURR73E!R AS' AI.A R U •. RIGHT TO MANE ALL' NOT INCONSISTENT WITH THE USE THEREOF FOR PUBLIC HIGHWAY PURPOSES.ALSO/HEvaZ1PLAT-Tr E. I TRACTS.ON PARCELS NOr LAND SHOWN ONECESsARY STHISFOR CUTST T E ORIGIMAALL 0EASONADLETHELOTS. GRADINGOIALLN3TREETSANDAVENUESSHOWNHEREON.• IN WETNESS WHEREOF WE HAVE HEREUNTO SET OUR HANDS ANDSEAL!THI3_u110 WIT OFIJQVTMIIFa!A.D.1040_ 8A .EZ1rr_v47._ —.L^4S$T_/SEILn._ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT S•AT[OF rNNINGTON LOUNTY 0/RING l 1.1. WANED ANDAYEDAND APPROVED THI3 ssauncacc MEE THAT.L0 OAT O7 A.0.1046. YYOE RfIGNED.A MOTA PVOL CIsiCIISNALLT A P4V AR CA-L,JTC9ART101ND JlMIR 7A E.A fT(:CALTI.OP.I$WIFE TOYE KNOWN TOR[THE EMON3WHOEXECUTEDTHCROREGMNCDEDIANDDVLUNTAL[DGLD TO ME.THATTHEYSIGMCD ANDSEALED THCSANEFWOCpeRTYROYSM•I•SfaMEEE AND VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED FOR THE LCES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MY RAND AND OPTIC! THE DATANO YEAS FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN. NAtIIf w.lar•al• E N GE all IT THAT TR[WITHIN PLAT OFSTEWAOT.3 HIONL AND ACRE TRACT! WA aA••RU•HRa nJ{67?L1J7..mown I$DULY APPROVED DV THE KING COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 1HI1•a 1H DAY OF •A.D.IMtOP. L.p..LTeR NOTARYsA7sleJ.$tats_ —'YYCI41111--- FLAirwlsl!?A" raarilro PUOUCfl emus RESTRICTIONS NO LOT OR PORTION or LOT CI THUS PUT EXCEPTING THOSE LOT!WHICH ARENEREINAITERRESTRICTEDTOSUSINESSUEE. SE CIVI DEO AND SOLD.OR RE-SOLO.OROWNERAIIF CHANGE 0 OR TRANSFERRED.THEREIN THE OWNERSHI P OF ANTIT• PORTS ON CRIME PLAT SHALL DE LESS THAN 1HE AREA REQUIRED FOR THE LSE METRIC?DAMNED AID APPROVED THID.IfIE DAY OP PILIMH%A.O.IMP• 9t4 *>k' STATED ON THIS PLAT,INANELY Pom SQ.IT.FOR SUPYRSOY 10[.WITH A MINIMUM LOTWIDTH0IPDHISP L qt 1 ALL LOTS ill'MIS PLAT AR(QESTNICTEO TO l-E SUSIRDON USE.ca1+RNLl(7F{i W*rw ` eIRRI iiiRTili warrant-.renefgagMeags."run or CERTIFICATE I HEREEY CERTIPY THAT THE PLAT MISTEWAR7P HIGHLANDACOE TRACTS ISIIEASEDUPONAllACTUALANDSuNENv1!•ON OP NEC TI ONO.TOWNSHIP al.FLEDOAR:,FOR RECORD ATTNE REQUEST OF THE RtNO COUNTY FLAMMNG C9NY1Sl ION RANC(S GJT.W Y: MONUMENTS IfLVE DEEM SET.AND LOT ANDVO14, DA R:, ta . PAGE 1P.ATI,pQ YIN KIN RUT IOA.M.ANDRELNDED IN @LOGE CORNERS STAKED CORIUM ILV N THE GROUNDS THAT I HAVE FULLY=FP-VOLVYQ y OF.SLATf.FAOQ la•RECOAi1l OF HIND CO UFIT.WMNINOTON. LIED WITH TH(POOtlISINI .M THE dTATTJTEi.AMO O/TH8 R&GILATIOW GOV[W WqPLATING. WY iwt____. PIu E4TIRRAL1l1R FTt•8RPS.TOr.'Tr4wruc-nar-- DOWN. RaIWNa MASS xt[EHIEE sma 4 RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER MAR 2 01979 EXHIBIT ON -AM ' PM n718,9rI019111211121.3141516ITEMNo. /[/7 7 ir an No.W-AK-555.1 evious Form No.80 SP) Drawn by r Checked Date Plat Vol. PG.Order No, ' SKETCH OF PROPERTY SE OUT IN ATTACHED ORDER - To assist in locating the premises. It i not based on a survey, and the company assumes no liability for variations if any, in dimensions and location. 7 77.---li 3 1 7.9 2T- .. 1ff I •1 1 i I I A CIDIt, g I i 1 0i30N , t• 1) 1 . TV 9% •.—.} g)' TO eS ta ON I T•1 C\ T`l I Tf 0TN 03 1 TV I Ca, I N 1678I 9 19 io I /2 V _I - 1 - 1 1 s T co\) Yzfr: '. L...A.Eatiszif_r.:_cd!FE6z_ 7TH. 7 4• S E 1.141 i 1 1 occIi S l Aik 1 CS. et QIN I a ••-' t " •, . . • • 1 RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAR 2 01979 PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER AM PM 7,819110,111.12,11213,4151E PUBLIC HEARING a MARCH 20 , 1979 APPLICANT : STEVEN M . WHITSON EXHIBIT NO. 1 FILE NUMBER: R-312-79 ITEM NO. ñ - /Ll9 A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST : The applicant requests approval of a rezone from GS-1 to R- 1 to permit future subdivision of the subject site and construction of a second single family residence . (Site development map attached ) . B . GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record : STEVEN M . WHITSON 2. Applicant:STEVEN M . WHITSON 3 . Location : Vicinity of 3512 N . E . 7th Street Vicinity Map Attached ) 4 . Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5 . Size of Property : 28 ,700 square feet 6. Access : Via N . E . 7th Street 7 . Existing Zoning : GS-1 , General Classification District; Minimum lot size 35 ,000 square feet 8. Existing Zoning in the Area : GS-1 , R-1 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Single Family Residential 10. Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was property published in the Record Chronicle on March 9 , 1979 and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance on March 8, 1979 . C . HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance #1789 dated September 9 , 1959 . The current GS-1 zoning has existed since annexation . D . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND : 1 . Topography : The site is essentially level . 2 . Soils : Arents , Alderwood (AmC ) , Runoff is medium and the erosion hazard is moderate to severe . 3 . Vegetation : The site consists of lawn grass and abundant stands of Douglas Firs near the north and south property boundaries . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : STEVEN M . WHITSON , File No : R-312-79 MARCH' :20, 1979 PAGE TWO 4. Wildlife : Existing vegetation on the site provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 5. Water : There was no evidence of surface water on the subject site 6. Land Use : An existing single family residence is located in the southerly portion of the subject site . Developed single family lots are located in all directions from the site . E . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The area is basically single family residential in nature . F . PUBLIC SERVICES : . 1 . Water and Sewer : A 4" watermain extends east-west on N . E . 7th adjacent to the subject site and a 6" main runs north-south of Queen Avenue N . E . approximately 800 feet east of the site . An 8" sanitary sewer also runs north-south on Queen Avenue . 2. Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements . 3 . Transit: Metro Transit Route #107 operates along N . E . 7th Street adjacent to the subject site . 4. Schools : Honeydew Elementary School is located within % mile to the east of the subject site and McKnight Junior High School is approximately 14 miles northwest while Hazen High School isl 3/4 miles to the northeast and Renton Vocational Technical Institute is approximately 2 mile to the southwest. 5. Recreation : Kiwanis Park is within 14 mile to the east of the site and Windsor Hills Park is approximately 1 mile to the southwest and the North Highlands Park is within 11 miles to the north . G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 1 . Section 4-729 , "G" , General Classification District. 2. Sec.tion 4-706 , R- 1 , Single Family Residence District. H . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT : 1 . Comprehensive Plan , 1965 , Land Use Report , Objective 6 , page 18. I . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT : 1 . Natural Systems : Rezone of the site will not have a direct impact. However, future development of the site will disturb existing soils , increase storm water runoff and have an effect on traffic and noise levels in the area . These impacts can be mitigated through proper development controls and procedures , however. 2 . Employment/Population : Minor . 3. Schools : Minor 4 . Social : Minor . 5 . Traffic : Minor . 1 I PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : STEVEN M. WHITSON , File No ; R-312-79 MARCH 20, 1979 PAGE TWO 4. Wildlife : Existing vegetation on the site provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 5. Water : There was no evidence of surface water on th.e subject site . 6. Land Use : An existing single family residence is located in the southerly portion of the subject site . Developed single i family lots are located in all directions from the site . E . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The area is basically single family residential in nature . F . PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer: A 4" watermain 'extends east-west on N. E . 7th adjacent to the subject site and a 6" main runs north-south of Queen Avenue N . E . approximately. 8Q0 feet east of the site . An 8" sanitary sewer also runs north-south on Queen Avenue . 2. Fire Protection : Provided by the, Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements . 3 . Tra;nsit: Metro Transit Route #107 operates along N . E . 7th Street adjacent to the subject site . 4. Schools : Honeydew Elementary School is located within 2 mile to the east of the subject site and McKnight Junior High School is approximately 14 miles northwest while Hazen High School is 1 3/4 miles to the northeast and Renton Vocational Technical Institute is approximately z mile to the southwest . 5. Recreation : Kiwanis Park is within 4. mile to the east of the site and. Windsor Hills Park is approximately 1 mile to the southwest and the North Highlands Park is within 12 miles to the north . G ., APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 1 . Section. 4-729, "G" , General Classification District. 2. Section 4-706 , R-1 , Single Family Residence District. H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY' DOCUMENT : 1 . Comprehensive Plan , 1965 , Land Use Report , Objective 6 , page 18. I . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT : 1 . Natural Systems : Rezone of the site will not have a direct impact. However , future development of the site will disturb existing soils , increase storm water runoff and have an effect on traffic and noise levels in the area . These impacts can be mitigated through proper development controls and procedures , however. 2. Employment/Population : Minor . 3. Schools : Minor 4 . Social : Minor. 5 . Traffic : Minor. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 20 , 1979 APPLICANT : STEVEN M. WHITSON FILE NUMBER: R-312-79 A . SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST : The applicant requests approval of a rezone from 'GS-1 to R-1 to permit future subdivision of the subject site and construction of a second single family residence . (Site development map attached ) . B. GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 .., ..,Owner of Record : STEVEN M . WHITSON 2 . Applicant:STEVEN M. WHITSON 3 . Location : Vicinity of 3512 N . E . 7th Street Vicinity Map Attached ) 4 . Legal Description : A detailed. legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5 . Size of Property : 28 ,700 square feet 6. Access : Via N . E . 7th Street 7 . Existing Zoning : GS-1 , General Classification District ; Minimum lot size 35 ,000 square feet 8. Existing Zoning in the Area : GS-1 , R-1 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Single Family 'Residential 10. Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was property published in the Record Chronicle on March 9 , 1979 and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance on March 8 , 1979 . _ ' C . HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance #1789 dated September 9 , 1959 . The current GS-1 zoning 'has existed since annexation . D . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND : 1'. Topography : The site is essentially level . 2 . Soils : Arents , Alderwood (AmC ) , Runoff is medium and the erosion hazard is moderate to severe . 3. Vegetation : The site consists of lawn grass and abundant stands of Douglas Firs near the north and south property boundaries . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT. TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : STEVEN M . WHITSON , File No : R-312-79 MARCH 29 , 19.79 PAGE FOUR Additional comments of other departments are attached for consideration'. . . M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS : Recommend approval of the requested rezone from GS- 1 to R-1 based upon the above analysis , the compatibility of the proposed use to the existing uses and Comprehensive Plan Policies and that the site has not been previously considered by a specific or an area-wide zoning review. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : STEVEN M WHITSON , File No : R-312-79 MARCH 20, 1979 PAGE THREE J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the_ City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C , a negative declaration of environmental impact has been issued . This declaration is conditional upon the retention of as many existing trees on the site as possible per Planning Department approval . K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED : 1 . City of Renton Building Division . 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division . 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering, Division . 4. City of Renton Utilities Division . 5 . City of Renton Fire Department. L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : . 1 . The proposed rezone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan land use element which designates the site and general area as single family residential . 2 . Although the requested rezone would result in a zoning classification permitting smaller lot sizes (from GS-1 , minimum lot size 35 ,000 square feet to R-1 , minimum lot size 7200 square feet) , the proposal remains compatible with the established single family residential character surrounding the Highland Acre Tract which this is a part. Lots as small as 5 , 500 square feet exist adjoining or within one block . 3. The applicant' s proposed construction of an additional single family residence on the site will require submittal of a short plat and approval by the Hearing Examiner . Due to the width of the lot an exception to the Subdivision Ordinance for a pipestem lo.t on the westerly portion of the property will also be required . 4. Review of the Planning Department records indicates no area-wide rezoning has been considered in the vicinity other than the general analysis in 1965 relating to adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. However , Tract #14 at the east end of N . E . 7th Street was rezoned to R-1 in 1961 . 5 . Suitable water is available to the subject site . However , sanitary sewers are not presently available in the vicinity . This will need to be resolved for any future residential construction as a result of this rezone . 6. The site contains a number of significant evergreens . These should be preserved as much as possible to mitigate the environmental impact. 7 . A number of property owners in the vicinity have telephoned the Planning Department expressing the belief that certain restrictive covenants limiting lot size to the present 28 ,700 square feet apply to the subject parcel . Review of the municipal records does not indicate any such requirement by the City or the existance of said covenants . 8. . The subject area is in transition from relative large lots to smaller lots as evidenced by division of lots 1 & 4 of Block 1 to 12 ,000 square feet and lot 7 of Block 2 to 14,000 square feet , and lot 1 of Block 2 to 6 ,000 square feet. Based upon this transitional condition Section 4-3014(b) indicates that the property is potentially zoned for the use proposed . 61„„,,v2w ciliii)14 it31,131,5 . i.,.., 6, ',$-;. 1;',,ti•-* 't•t,...... , 4.,,,•':.,1„....,_ 4'. ' t: "•,';„4,,,: ri--1,,,,,`,:••4,."".-_,'„-e.,:',.f. , Wpwie"„"%i?!(1?1,14,•4'.-.„ • r. ..-.. *,,4, .,aiiiimmigmesibyalibmidLiAtimili..„ . .. tiM,4•4'• t'. . •T•Ilf„.. •eti ..!—•' Wt:: ,,,i• • ' ''''''':4•*'''''''• ' ' ..••• • ' .. I • f.f'• .3',:f::': 'j• _Joy A N '` .- • Y„ i..,.'',7' r•ii,:k•' • .-. ,... c.',..,''..' .....2., V'tiltlf ' I .1'o T" . 1 1 l'4'.'!'i-R1-.7 t.•''''''•1'i'0•1;..%atr,A4k. L. 1...'adAVI - ..','..,:ila, ' li If.t.i s.... `.. ' l'.'. L. t ''• 1.\t • 1. 1 ,f,„-•%.ill,"%t•'''tin,-,.,.. I • tow s .3. :.', 0.•,,, ,,1 ,,,. ..: 4 L•_•:,‘1 I • k •..`••:,•,,.I I 4. , -r1 . .., ,' •,.. - - .. , k, 1 .."f.r,!,,,:•.;',"'t .'',. ='. •••;...,,,'',..IV'•.' :'',r.' .• , .4.,;' - ,' .‘•..,'...,..',404,410Evp.-,, .:,. 4,,,, . $' -',-..,...-..,• , • IN..'41 9Y4,...'sP.'',. ))',..... ...;.:..,Y,, z'i.,t. .,,.,'...%...,,..;;.! . . ., .•: ! , i.*, '.. ,-,..-.,..'',-•), 1 .K. , - i s . ..1- HI . .a4/1 . f.,-.4,,,,.,-,N, i 1 Ai-14.1 5:tPs."bi ilA.,,,'• ..77v-I i 4 111 '' i4'ikr• ' 1.•••it,Z: ' i4,.• 1 -•• _ • 4 ., erf 1.4 Cg 4:4' -P c . 4,• f'• t—_ ....‘ ik, A- 4.. r• . - 4'4 4 " '•• -.4..0'; '."- 4'• 4:,,,,•.,.,. 1 i•^'••' .i''4•141;."':•ç...'' 4. . ' Itr10,:g.''r!•f:g.,'.1'4..,;:.:?;i1ri.:-.V.t.'::1:,':;:;-:fit.i,'.1",;i_•;;4-'4;*'''-':' l,.,';'.4„, ' .H1-•:•,;•„,..i, -..‘..t•':••••;•:,:,,,,.'•:••••‘‘,"';'••'-'4'.4 r ' x)'• -" - . g ,..!.,,,,:.r:..::::,,,, i, A,!,! F •: - •''':. •' • ...'• • .--' :'••• ••. ` , T. , _.;, ,. . -,....,,N•,i. •,. r.:,*:' '• A z Il • i.",•-,. . . . 41,e'r•Ito' '; . .. *: 4.,... •••• •• . ,r•:‘- .••••.•' ..,,i ,) '''''. •- •".,4::. *--;.....' 111:,' lbh."....,',L , 1 . .,,',,,,• : '..,.•_. r • k• -• ' . .•• ........i..,,p.i,,,. t.t 7,. ..,:•., *:"' AAN, -a...., , 4), . v-4-er..ize-tasu..- ' -. •"•;Tc•-' ' • 4,.74 i ,.., r .. 0 •• I .. 1Z4,, it••:6 b.,1 l•• •,.:_r-.....2.,Z....,...._ti— t if j4ti•}:, 1. 4*;',3.`-.- I... 7• 4-" 1...t , 4'•• C'1'" 6- V. t.. C.., 7.•;-' 4,1' 6i..8\,.•"t., - "' s'. I sr• t.. ,1/4 Yk . lAP'`'S• t r,'.:. i- t* r.•s"'.'';.•",' 4''.'-.,'` 4','4' Y...••• V"1:11:4'. . , .,,, V".'h. . . -........... ..';',...,•4,.. ....4.. ,,,•• . . r. „... . t.. „i, r ,• •,'“'" 44.•t...34' ' Id '-- 'VI•:,'. ., . .."1. _,f,(7. . ''''.41`44.17. 11" '' il '' . 1 ' . :1 nt' i 1 • '1.1 I .' Y.-- : z t •-''‘'''''. -. . 1, 1•k44*,.. ' I N•••1 • I E ,7 .. :.,: .,`...,';'.•, 7',' r, .: ?..:' ''''••••••-i.',-,' 1. r' . • L 0 •'•4 ,Ili;,.:, 0: i•i .": `,.., ... 1,i.;,,A.. 4 • : •:',‘,; ,:,^C,:,, ,, .;•.. , r. ,. , . .Er . ::, ,: . Vi 4.:•,i,4,,,;42.4,_.rt. A:f6i'AL.,' 4,,-..L,,,, ;,.r..,;%'-,':li,-4,-,,,,,, .:,,,,..4 V.,.),•; 0.,- },,4ft.c•:,;•,,,..,,,,,,,,fi, ,, , .•„, , e.v.VI.. .t 4' Wit'444.•>1.•;•-•• .;".,,ALrig.:"{1.,..,:ii 4:4,,•":1.'11,,W..:41,0,44,14r70,;111,4112,.,,•,. 4,•, ,I,..1.1.-,,L,„--4,.1.',--,;:,:,•••Irty.,.,4f,--,gq, tu.4••,:xl•.z.•t; '.-•-•‘• • . ', „...,. '.• : i 1.• •••...,..',...• ,4,4-4m...6,1,-,•,q,44,r,t7.‘,", ...r...14.,*...4,..1, ,,..,tz• :t..1..r.t.1‘.,4,:.,:prA .1-4*.t,"„:.-,4' •'•' .--',"*.- .'-''" ''''';•`-•'.'' I .• 1 . ;,, 14, - - 00 a I , ., Hi '14 ''''''3 4.. .e- o.1 • • • ,... ; .. 1 . . Li. . i ,. •,...:0 . 0- e.1 ,'••• :-- ---- •----•-r•-;• t• •..4:4t.- ---,.-••-.:. .; ,t,' --.••" e *\1/.r:- ., i.' di, '4; 1' ... • ,,,1 ! ,I-- --, .. • • .,•.: ;.; ri e ,r_.... ,,,-;•N , : ..,,,,,..,„•-•• .1. .., c.• cp”t , ..,„.• ., . , . . , 2. ••. L r :1 I' .s kJ I 01 1 T1 1 traR i p R—2 t 2 0 ; r,•, o I el 4. .„ na , B r iI ` r sf ; _ii'.•.15..: a[ s 1 11 111 t t a w p.rig I is..t =' 11 1 I 1 antra of i W i 4 1 1 1 1 ... U. 111101i ..., I N. E••j ilm.45, ill rs _• 4. Z. il!avL * !JiI9 111 I 4 O{ r 1 d . I T • " 6,!'a'- .. {iip F ' 3;._.I o ,a i W •Q'' Z•p 4 r'a ! i r-- r i 4, .b ., .» N,. t ° (ion 0A, •4• ; I4 y} 1 r•'' , '40' A . eeee nes ® t 1 jF WH •_/,sownsall 4 l d r/® f ll gl L - .- I1 s .. r..., .,' i I It a a 6. 113, 1 4 . Wp 10 m W u ro e. 1.. . r +i•+ 35 4r 4.,.. 41V:V, . '' '., ';':. t. i 119, 1 1 , rr f11. ,_. ,, r t 0 a l • t•` 1 I, °amino e idi alai 11 t,. rt . ..w. {{ r je. » sr. Q o a, 6.",. 33 ii° • 1 14'.. ''CO* . "'m ellgaI YYrri na ,'1 i 1 t u i• N n, 5T1a,;_{? ;a•. }: v., I. . .ME tz. t a ov ail I I J „ ', f 4_I- ' - --- - i m ik i p. 4 S R—I Y" -11'z• 1 + 'I r 1) 1I=' m'. , ;4 IMP I[[iiIINII salable P I j Ii I 0 ,• U r a r1._1 4 , u N TM ra ' I20 N '1 $ • N:. '7 TM 0440' E. cdsel0Tm. ._ y 0iN1 e. s•r aT. onipm Ira,. T.. Vol.'Atli i } IIiil.u—iA'3 G-_ Jr. I a,•: na' aoom mmee ,o o a ,f, i• " *Ot .a . r.. e:e ppQ p I ®®ee ,4• N O g 10 u L Ira rm s. ot ee iiiiiii,".1i,ito.,,i4LHEIN N.a...„ 0:im Llmmin 1+A d i t °. t. w .:w.. O I r I ii f im r - 1 -i . 7.H, .. 0,.., ......s. i t.-.- ' I A' WO Ns @` Isle£. I ' • i •• . •,'' . I ar I I I 1, R...1_ 1 . _ °~1 L/ t a ..,s— ;... ... I l I I i II !IJPfBi ' i t 1 I 11I STEVEN M . WHITSON R-312-79 APPLICANT STEVEN M . WHITSON TOTAL AREA ±28 ,700 square ft. , t PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via N . E . 7th Street EXISTING ZONING GS-1 , General Classification District a g EXISTING USE An existing single family residence is located on the southerly i purli.un of the site; remainder undeveloped. t PROPOSED USE Single Family Residential COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Single Family Residential r x COMMENTS r i ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: (DX Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department 0 Public Works Department Building Div . Engineering Div . Traffic Engineering Div . 00/--- Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department, (signed by responsible official or his designee e/ /0 67Z10454%1( 00, SUBJECT : Review of ECF Application No . :79 Name :6AtvAction e A/ Please review the attached . Review requested by (date ) : 0/ 7A Note : Responses to be written in ink . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 7=j 2 SIGNIFICANT I -"NON SIGNIFICANT Comments : 2 Sign tur of Director or Au orized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : U`U""Y / I SIGNIFICANT 1A NON SIGNIFICANT Comments : 1 z/Gl Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO: O Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department OPolice Department QPublic Works Department O Building Div. OEngineering Div. (Please verify legal descriptior Traffic Engineering Div . AV/----4> 0 Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his d ignee) DATE : 14b1 PLEASE REVVIEW THIS APPPLLICATI N FOR : APPLICANT : 6i&o/ 1 LOCATION : APPLICATION(S) : LICATION S( IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EX / q//]// pypIr RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Dep tment: 010 Approved J Not Approved Comments or conditions : 2 Tv 79 Signature o Director or A t orized epresentative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Dep tment : U ( "`- >Approved Q Not Approved Comments or conditions : 9/2_6/ () Signature o`f Director or Authorized Representative ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : O Finance Department Fire Department Library Department OPark' Department OPolice Department Public Works Department O Building Div . 0 Engineering Div.. (Please verify legal descriptio 0/Traffic Engineering Div . 0 Utilities Engineering Div . FROM : Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his d , ignee) 62 (%7, DATE : 14V17/4159 PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICANI N FOR : APPLICANT : 6 1, g 0k/60? LOCATION : 771 APPLICATION ( S) : Re092Z, "a-19 IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EX pl RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Depar meet : l,enFe=Ic vC ` aelN proved U Not Approved Comments or conditions : J-7 Signature of Director or Authorized Represent - tive Date ROUTING FOR. REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: i Finance Department 111 Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department 0 Public Works Department 8 Building Div . ngineering Div .efTraffic Engineering Div . O Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department, ( signed by responsible official or his designeee :Fis aeitg / ,.!.i oof SUBJECT : ; Review of ECF- e /— 7 ; Application No . :j / -- '79 r Act on Name : wee&4C p e 2® Please review the attached . Review requested by (date ) :01 # Note : 'Responses to be written in ink . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 24-FFIc LNG. E" E 6 I ! SIGNIFICANT NON SIGNIFICANT Comments : 7--- - / Signature of Director or Authorized epresentative Date it ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : O Finance Department 8 Fire Department Library Department Park Department OPolice Department O Public Works Department Or Building Div . 0 Engineering Div. (Please verify legal descriptic OTraffic Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his d . ignee) Af DATE : 0051 PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATI N FOR : APPLICANT : _ (y'L j LOCATION :0e /' ' ei s Re-N s e-/ APPLICATION( ) : =(iG i I IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EX pI3RETURNANYCOMMENTSTOTHEPLANNINGDEPARTMENTBY : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department :itAApprovedof Approved Comments or conditions : II Zei..,0,--„, Z— 23-2 ,- Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: O Finance Department IIIFire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department 0 Publ i /Works Department 8 Building Div . Engineering Div . 0 Traffic Engineering Div . O Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee&d oof SUBJECT : Review of ECF- 7 ; Application No . : — 2 -- ;19 6 , Action Name :__—A e ‘ 4 Please review the attached . Review requested by (date ) : Note : Responses to be written in ink . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : I GNIFICANT I: f ON SIGNIFICANT Comments : I '2-3 -? Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: O Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department 4l ice Department CPublic Works Department 8,wilding Div . Engineering Div . 0 Traffic Engineering Div . o Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee 9 e ii 00, SUBJECT : Review of ECF 7 ; Application No . : 79 p egg 6 Action Name :f edie: Please review the attached . Review requested by (date ) : Note : ' Responses to be written in ink . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : z e f--1Y` I ! SIGNIFICANT 11/N0N SIGNIFICANT Comments : 4:/h 2: -06 -,7i Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 1 ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : O Finance Department 8 Fire Department Library Department 0 Park Department o/Police Department Cr Public Works Department 0 Building Div . engineering Div. (Please verify legal descri o) QTraffic Engineering Div . O Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his ignee) 4 /\ (1, DATE : 1401 PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : AP.PL_ICANT : 7‘ 04.,'W LOCATION :Z AL i i APPLICATION(S) : Rege, -- er - 79 i41-,,/ IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EX pIRETURNANYCOMMENTSTOTHEPLANNINGDEPARTMENTBY : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : g- iviee-e',-G Approved Ej Not Aroved Comments or conditions : or Authorized Repres nta tive Datekri5tua7,6e2,- re of rectdr PROPOSED/FINAL DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No . R-312-79 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist- No . 436-79 5. FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Rezone from GS-1 to R-1 to permit future subdivision of the subject site- and construction of a second single family residence. . Proponent STEVEN M . WHITSON Location of Proposal Vicinity of 3512 N . E . 7th Street Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON , PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal has been determined to ® have Q not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS ® is pis not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) ( c ) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental /Y?lnificance : A negative declaration of environmental impact has been issued . This declaration is conditional upon the retention of as many existing trees on the site as possible per Planning Department approval . Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official Gordon Y . Ericksen Title Plan "i Di r`ect r Date Signature 1:. r1". Y Y City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 OF I A o THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENg=WASH. MESE o Li)n CHARLES J. DELAURENT7 I, MAYOR © PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. ccr 235- 2550 O44,, SEP , f,# February 23 , 1979 Steven M. Whitson . 1817 - 130th N . E . Bellevue , Washington ' 98005 RE : NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC WEARING DATE FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G TO R- 1 , File R-312-79 ; property located on N . E . 7th Street between Monroe Avenue N . E . and Queen Avenue N . E . Dear Mr . Whitson : The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on February 20 , 1979 A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for March 20 , 1979 at 9 : 00 a . m . . Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present . All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing . If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department, 235-2550 . Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen Planning ; ector By : If ' 41/: avid R. -C ' emens Associate Planner NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON) WASHINGTON i A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON , WASHINGTON, ON MARCH 20 1979 , AT 9 :00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . 'STEVEN M. WHITSON , APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G TO R-1 , File R-312-79 ; property located on N. E . 7th St . between Monroe Ave . N . E . an.d Queen Ave. N . E . 2 . JOYCE' DEVELOPMENT CO . ,. INC . , APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL OF 35-LOT SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION (AZALEA LANE) , File PP-313-79 ; property located at the southwest corner of N . E . 24th St. and Aberdeen Ave. N . E . Legal descriptions of applications noted above on file in the Renton Planning Department. 1 ALL INTERESTED ,PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON MARCH 20 , 1979 AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. GORDON Y . ERICKSEN PUBLISHED March 9, 1979 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION i ` I , STEVE MUNSON HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES . OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. i ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public , on the 7th day of March 19 79 . SIGNED Agit,-e.71/4,4.4-46ril TOA AFFIDAVIT k ti°',\ 1(›- J SiPIre h jir%, 7'$C being duly s abv4sv that I am the owner of the property' involved in this application and -t. t the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me thish day of Aozw2O 1917 NotaryPublic in and fdthe State of Washington, residing at Zahotifi 6)7 Y. 6J),/ 4/,-A— I(Name of Notary Public) Signature of Owner) 9/9 C/'-61-) i b )(f/7 /3 /1./- I(Address) Address) fie//e 30 3 City) State) Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application. Date Received 19 By: Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 EIVTO CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM E— Q` ® \°'\'. z tzt AN FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 1,AU IG Application No. 3/.2 - 71 1 Environmental Checklist No. ..44-C1F-'/.3G ! i PROPOSED, date: FINAL, 'date: Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance Declaration of Non-Significance Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: q IF Introduction The. State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all. major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment . The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information • • presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required , or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided , or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply , just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACKGROUND - 1 . Name of Proponent Sbven M. Whitson 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: 1817 130th N.E. Bellevue Washington, 98005 F A3_1,1,1,•5 3. Date Checklist submitted January 12, 1979 4. Agency requiring Checklist City of Renton 5. Name of proposal , if applicable; N .A. 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : The rezone and subdivision of lot 10, in block 1, of stewarts highland acr. Tract, as per plat, recorded in Volume 43 of Plats , on page 17, records of King County, Said subdivision shall entail the creation of one aditional lot,, behind 3512 N .E . 7th St. Renton Wahhinton 9$055 PLANNING DEPARTMENT. 1PRELIMINARY REPORT. TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : STEVEN M . WHITSON , File No : R-312-79 MARCH 29, 1979. PAGE FOUR Additional comments of other departments are attached for consideration . iM . DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS : Recommend approval of the requested rezone from GS-1 to R-1 based upon the above analysis , the compatibility of the proposed use to the existing uses and Comprehensive Plan Policies and that the site has not been previously considered by a specific or an area-wide zoning review. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : STEVEN M WHITSON , File No : R-312-79 MARCH 20, 1979 PAGE THREE J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the_ City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C , a negative declaration of environmental impact has been issued . This declaration is conditional upon the retention of as many existing trees on the site as possible per Planning Department approval . K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED : 1. City of Renton Building Division . 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division . 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division . 4. City of Renton Utilities Division . 5. City of Renton Fire Department. L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : . 1 . The proposed rezone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan land use element which designates the site and general area as single family residential . 2 . Although the requested rezone would result in a zoning classification permitting smaller lot sizes (from GS-1 , minimum lot size 35 ,000 square feet to R-1 , minimum lot size 7200 square feet) , the proposal remains compatible with the established single family residential character surrounding the Highland Acre Tract which this is a part . Lots as small as 5 ,500 square feet exist adjoining or within one block. 3. The applicant' s proposed construction of an additional single family residence on the site will require submittal of a short plat and approval by the Hearing Examiner . Due to the width of the lot an exception to the Subdivision Ordinance for a pipestem lot on the westerly portion of the property will also be required . 4 . Review of the Planning Department records indicates no area-wide rezoning has been considered in the vicinity other than the general analysis in 1965 relating to adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. However ,_ Tract #14 at the east end of N . E . 7th Street was rezoned to R-1 in 1961 . 5 . Suitable water is available to the subject site . However , sanitary sewers are not presently available in the vicinity. This will need to be resolved for any future residential construction as a result of this rezone . 6 . The site contains number of significant evergreens . These should be preserved as much as possible to mitigate the environmental impact. 7 . A number of property owners in the vicinity have telephoned the Planning Department expressing the belief that certain restrictive covenants limiting lot size to the present 28 ,700 square feet apply to the subject parcel . Review of the municipal records does not indicate any such requirement by the City or the existance of said covenants . 8. . The subject area is in transition from relative large lots to smaller lots as evidenced by division of lots 1 & 4 of Block 1 to 12 ,000 square feet and lot 7 of Block 2 to 14,000 square feet , and lot 1 of Block 2 to 6 ,000 square feet. Based upon this trans=itional condition Section 4-3014(b) indicates that the property is potentially zoned for the use proposed . 1 i r .‘,. rd4.....''..4,.....,,. '.,. ,,....'.., 2 4..' tr.....:.., , ., I, r .,-...::..-,- 1. 4.1-..•1 .... 7..-: 1...:. ':,-::'.:...... ' 1''..'...,''......: . .. .. 4 L lid 1 ti S I 1• b.. ;..-t.',„:k..— ,7..-r 1 7,.1. CPI e. NY .1, 1 qt • ! , d 1 • 1.r, t. '!. .° :'' ,,V1 ,.' ..... V V d'' ....- . "." • .' ...." _'.., .........i-- kf- , . +? . ," '' -, I ; - -, - --- ,,. '',.'• '' 0 r—-- • • i .._`•) 1INe' ,;‘..• . 1,., •, • • • I ; ' - 1 ;• .' ....eg"1 Pi-e' •.;'.. a A EI A G.P I•4.1.`i"'r" ."..t.N., ,, I ti + .%•!:,4• ",t• " ' "•0. ' 2,.'. ' y I • • I 4,•" , 1,'4;t'4"t:r*,,:,4...-44?;',2•-_-•'..,'•44V-iiiieq.-,4tt,'!•' ,1•!';',..'-A•-,irr,'!4• 1,1" 4,“":;",";tra.:•"4/101, .••,,,.:*.•.: .4. ,--. , ,•.,...... :.;.• ...,!_.,. •,I, . — „ .-,..,..r. 4,..,..„-, -,,,..„ ..,4.4.,. ,-,..,..,..„...,.,...„...,....-j ,' ,el,•,'0'4.''',A C V't,k '•4-ie.;„,,,,n.....,7‘,.. .-.....1%. ., ,I., ‘...it ;;'I-,.7,4-1,1y,..=,....r:Or,+..'1.1.,,,r1. e. 4 v. t t G)if r•1 4'i !I ii 1, ' 's•-•• 1rt'''' 1. .41.'4,,t•• A.if+•0. Nt,;0,-, s,,, ditAi 1..,* . c >tit,' • 4 46-: . .k .z••• 41.7+4PZ`: , 3 4f,-,'.Lie,',.:' . " , •4.•itr,2 A - 2.0-;-. •••---- +4. 2. 4,•+. S'• .4- p . i1 ` t- ,, 1-., i, 4tPJ,•:,' G,..+ 1:..,- 1•0:" 70g`,:2'.- tO4?...44,,,-•.4 r"..' 1•,.,r-•. 1,. 1--,,,"/. j,- 1 r ;,;,', I.,,..-,..),,,,,,, J. .....', 0•.'••.,..::.3110 N,' 4•,3-1.1,:--'.;,:.:`:,='.* L,:"-- r••:•-•. •-••"- 1.,••%• 4.-4,. V.-.,* 1 1.."• N1t•-- eir4:: f4. 1.„? e=.. r' l,.,,',•—.,•-, ----,, I, c- 0'-".,--`4, 4.-...- l..: fr''.,'.,.:.' i' A- Ist '.Z 1 ', 2 • l ./..)'` 1 - d 4 ' 2• 4; . , :. 4.-,!--,.,•-`.` P:..•A..";;... l•;. tr- i, r.....',';”. 4' l.,.- 1:, b;,& t. 7,%. ,+ 2 z zz...F.;•1,-. . * : ,; .. . ( . ,...,-,-1';'..?,-;1?1:.:IS!t-',1'... :'-'•.;-5,.,±3,k..1s.Vi;;;Ig;,...4,441.1.4i, iti..,':::.;',',i'-;.;, ',.. z.:7:.1. 4.7t."-'1,:"44' ,fi .':-:-.2 1:;;`,•Z\;, ' ',' ,•p.": -1, :f-,,,1,:'?.o.',;,-, ,,,^.1.f--0.-r., 0,.,,o1.!::,,,,,..A.'',,r,-erclit,f,•,rtsifilr.,„.?1,0-.-,..;,;.--.- .'40,.r.'r'f'41-.1.1d.v1A,, ,,,,,,'.1, il..,e. 4.•., • „'...4. - '.. ..':1.,,,,v:'' tr.r:'-'14,• 1.< Id • - - , i'.•: • ' , 1 claaesc ..--Itifnra. Vp ', • '` 1 .4*'.1; I t 1 • k-,-4%."'i17 ,i,„,,,•/!„, 4? I ti.4.1••• 41'i'ir&I'V tV` t t"' "1.1"r,':•'''AMR d•VI- • ••' ' 4' Iligi*' 4- 0.i..1 1 14,o.' .'•^ ,'A --,,-, •• ••• .- '•4 tS.,4"'' +44.34,ilotri r 0 ';'-'4,!•,'&,IA VA.,,t.-,,,,K,,.•.• v' "•:. . 1 11 1 t., i,i r '. t, 1'.'',-:t..1."' t c 1 I A„),. • iINE. T 11 77 ' i.:-.7,.,6,...: ity7e1' ' ••••4,04',7.4ft,!. ' ..... . . '''‘X 44Lk,,',..Li 14,.4';'. 4:• -.-;1•"' )4.,'I. r te4,,, .0'". 4'.' i•'Old Orif***., ,t• .6' • IfF. ri.,,,..,, ..., . ., 4.".'.: ••• A: 'Alt,,,,% •* ,", , t , 2.A,,' k 4.", ' -og • ..• - '.4•,+t. -,+. ,f---..„,"..r• • t. , " • •• 4.sti...k. eiteWuti,, Ix,'.....: ; ;1 -r)11:514',i,,,*.---,..'s- •.. " . ' ' 11 I 1:4 • I.% -1,......,,, ,,,ik k• \ V'Mi, Awse,••3't•0.., 4:•••• 1, 4 •-'t:44. 4.,•,.. .• ,, .4. .., •-, ff`',,t1„, 1' I' l'-` '; - '::‘,4:+1:,. :41,'.:4, 1 4: 1., A., 1* i - s. s, i - 1 : I? . il' 00 j. Vie,-;‘,-, e 7: iC •v„.:,,1.A.,..4..Iir • , , .. ti...;:• . • g ., •,. r•'-'•'':',',,' 4•"J.*4''••'•".''„.:,,-.'...'' i I,ri•.',."••.'" L. " .• 1•'. .:• t r'e•.. 1 , _.,A. 1• 11'‘,:.-•.46'''.t•i,, iii S r. 0 .•, A, N.,..S1"4' 'r s'i'.. j •, ''), .faz • 1 ;$'r*11.4'.1.{.i ,4*./..i'..,4"::ffqre.71.1,NPIRMIRPM11111111111.f:• ••4-,, fr•••••i, r 7, j,, ...-%A•••••,, •.,• '• ',.- ' 1`,., ' ',, f:t.,,. -_,, ,.,••.. .....•-• x,..,,,, i';', . ::: .. • . I •..4,--". .,. ,-, ,,,,, -v.•• -,-4... . ,-'4,... •. •••-.. :•-•-. to .\-. -;',1.• '' 1,7, I if , scrEva kviiirso, 1 • tR_ e43 1• 14 , x4i1 •', • j I ' !_ }•- - --f i 11 1 3 4 B — : 2-- •r ' 1 , a y- !1—,Y , _ 1*a 1:.:). s I 1 1 ss,s...• \\F,,i'- i . t• T•al 1 _ (aA I •j . : g i W 1 j 11 1 101,-,-...-dall was lit Ji a I i rbi '10 i t Iimi N-•• , 43=4 tore 8, Ai", p . L 0'. N E.1 M P sa ri1®Z a..a e1 i. _ m 40 4 55 • // a ` I o' r. 'El a 141 s 1 e 1M- ,u g a' 5' • k! 1•. ' II N ' W .. mod a in•, Ir.ra a M.. .s, T,,a .. j.G. t ,ol ':' ®Wsi Z Elo.,...11, r:, 9; 4,4 ,6 ,,_,51•.p p •' 11, Z 4 ' a2.` h /oef l 1) E 1. a5,t wile 1 ie J •dill /' fli. —" - I/ e0s. 117; I , E ./ t..t0••• 1" m Wuio ;.4,t „ .In , d'.` : ' y 37 .`D I• '..i i li t , 16©'• 32 I .— I: i NF: 3 Fr 1 7• r _el t. i I r ml s`.I t' .I' Y 1' 2 . _.— T 4 i Y 7 y 7 O." r ` I '' M ST. TT OQOf' 1 lal . - T1 71,- 19$ 1• ' ` 733 oa} J ' Ill.' RN . t' 1_Lau N". .1 J 1111Ates .. 111 1' n '_ ! L, 2°=-+D , -r{ L s^. .'. . Uwe ,: 1r i0 O { + . -Lr. I y,. W Pill" Zs zw. of _",, •;'- .j',Js , , •, • a a -r4. a. j^ R • 5:- Ill•° I` NH Ni`Mi'Ifirt ::. - o,aly. n 1. • l •4; i 0 o g7 VON;' . " _ 1 1- U FWD S% i_ 4 t,. 3 s t I _ L_i 4..' I V A 1 O N ' M 6 a,.o ®. S I# •N.E.7 ., S ZLiv Ni.H• aaalll S 1 5 • 7 i 9.'91. A 2 1 .fillik. R-14IJj Ai 11 iriftepee ee At: r - 1800 n a .+.. e '' e iri ,` - E')_ •°el II PINII ._' 4.(•; 1.1 i m , 1. ,/ i ..-. -s.,..• ___ . L 1 ii f- s •,, • . . -\ . 0:- O4 w•uc • k.k) 1 i p9-3q u.a.a..IIN g 1 I 1 —.. 1--- —i R iv. , fri , i 6 . ., o . u A I .. . i I it w I j a LP ali V i e t • + ' 4' P I —_ t j , I}=;®I ,I IIII1 rt1 T :•714 20 1LL I. E-.-d TN STEVEN M . WHITSON R-312-79 APPLICANT STEVEN M . WHITSON TOTAL AREA ±28 ,30.0 square ft. PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via N . E . 7th Street EXISTING ZONING GS-1 , General Classification District EXISTING USE An existing single family residence is located on the southerly_ por-Liurl of the site; remainder undeveloped. PROPOSED USE Single Family Residential COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Single Family Residential COMMENTS 4+ T.& =,.. 4 I_ ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: O Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department Public Works Department Building Div . Engineering Div . 2)/Traffic Engineering Div . aWC/._ _Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department, (signed by responsible official or his designeez)4fl e/ev/,, Application No . : 1pe ® '79SUBJECT : Review of ECF_ App Name :F/)o /. 6 ' 'Acton thf 2/e /vs'e14, 11) Please review the attached . Review requested by (date ) :7. Note : Responses to be written in ink . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 7! cry SIGNIFICANT IZNON SIGNIFICANT Comments : 2- /2,f/7Y Sign ur of Director or Au itorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : bri-tu"Y / Ovc . 1 SIGNIFICANT lA NON SIGNIFICANT Comments : 2/ /-4 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO: Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department Public Works Department Building Div. O Engineering Div. (Please verify legal descriptior affic EngineeringDiv.O Tr de— Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his d ignee) DATE : 141y* PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPPLLICATI N FOR : 67%APPLICANT :w i LOCATION : APPLICATION S : V 't -- 21/e-7 i 0/ IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EX I go RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Dep tment : to i 0175 Approved Ej Not Approved Comments or conditions : Signature o Director or A t orized epresentative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Approved Q Not Approved Comments or conditions : 2./2 dt Signature o Director or Authorized Representative De 4 ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : 3 Finance Department 8 Fire Department Library Department OPark Department OPolice Department Public Works Department . O Building Div . 0 Engineering Div.. (Please verify legal descriptic Traffic Engineering Div . O Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his deignee ) DATE : PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATI N FOR : APPLICANT : e4 45/ LOCATION : e , ° • 7 4 / APPLICATIONS) : '=(i IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EX AI RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Depar ment : Rd-F'=ik En/co IE EEAeJ fC, Approved Not Approved Comments or conditions : i 6N. g /72i Signature of Director or Authorized Represent tive Date r ROUTING FOR. REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: O Finance Department IIIFire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department Public Works Department 8 Building Div . Engineering Div . Traffic Engineering Div . O Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee e ,e zekt, A 1 ication No . : ' SUBJECT : Review of ECF- pp Action Name :l f,,++ 4 a /2,erze 4 pg.P,0 a tv‘ Please review the attached . Review requested by (date ) : , , 71 Note : Responses to be written in ink . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : PP1 ENCJ. E. E • G I ! SIGNIFICANT X7N SIGNIFICANT Comments : 27P--- --,-- 7-91E-`;'-- 7^ )CJ Signature of Director or Authorized epresentative Date ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : O Finance Department 8 Fire Department Library Department OPark Department OPolice Department O Public/Works Department Building Div . OEngineering Div . (Please verify legal descriptic OTraffic Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM : Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his .d ignee) do iT 10 / J DATE : C0`r PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATI N FOR : APPLICANT : 640,4 g 06 iff? LOCATION :2 /11 . 7ei APPLICATIONS ) G e. - 79 k:// IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EX iI RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department :r i Jj Approved riot Approved Comments or conditions : 7(..- 6.,_, z_ 23-27' . Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: (2) Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department Public Works Department Building Div . Engineering Div . 0 Traffic Engineering Div : O Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department, ( signed by responsible official or his designee 4 _ e ee& W oof SUBJECT : Review of ECF- 44-49 ; Application No . h e/ 7,, Action Name : sw/a /ids Please review the attached .Review requested by (date ) : 9 Note : Responses to be written in ink . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 1 ' SIGNIFICANT I ON 'SIGNIFICANT Comments : 2-3 -?( Signature of Director or Authoriz d . Representative Date ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: O Finance Department 111 Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department Public Works Department Building Div .R0/7 Engineering Div . J Traffic Engineering Div . 0 Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department, ( signed by responsible official or his designee4 0 „e 09,h, SUBJECT : Review of ECF- Application No . : - 2 ' -, Action Name : 4 I e 4/ Please review the attached . Review requested by (date ) : Note : Responses to be written in ink . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : u7:2-36e i-i- I ! SIGNIFICANT Iv'NON SIGNIFICANT Comments : Z65 Z -06 - '7 ' Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 1 ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO: 0 Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department Public Works Department CD Building Div. le Engineering Div. (Please verify legal descripti OTraffic Engineering Div . 0 Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his d ignee) r DATE : 1/kV* PLEASE4/6/2 REVIEW THIS APPLICATI N FOR : APPLICANT : 1 LOCATION : f ' • 7 APPLICATION() : Rentz IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EX AI RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 1-Pi- Approved D Not A/roved Comments or conditions : ignature of erect o'r- or Authorized Repres ntaitive Date 1 1 PROPOSED/FINAL DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No . R-312-79 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist' No. 436-79 XX FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Rezone from GS-1 to . R-1 to permit future subdivision of the subject site and construction of a second single family residence. . i Proponent STEVEN M . WHITSON Location of Proposal Vicinity of 3512 N . E . 7th Street Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON , PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal has been determined to 0 have (9 not have a 1 significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is x is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) (c ) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency` of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental /P? nificance : A negative declaration of environmental impact has been issued . This declaration 1 is conditional upon the retention of as many existing trees on the site as possible per Planning Department approval . 1 1 Measures , if any , that could 'be taken to prevent or mitigate the 1 environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official Gordon Y . Ericksen Title Plan,, i wO Di {ect•r Date `' Signature City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 1 R-312-79 Page Two Mr. Pearson indicated that construction of a residence on the specified location on Exhibit #3 would require removal of a majority of existing trees on the property and would create visual impact to his property located north of the site. He expressed objection to the proposal which he felt would be inconsistent with the existing character of the neighborhood. Responding was: Gerald R. Smith 3518 N.E. 7th Street Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Smith expressed concern regarding location of existing accessory structures if rezones to other properties occurred. The Examiner explained that the subject rezone applies only to the specific property owned by the applicant, and instigation of zoning revisions to other properties could only occur by requests from individual property owners in adjacent areas. Mr. Smith inquired regarding the capacity of the subject property for installation of an additional septic tank. The Examiner explained requirements for King County and City of Renton approval of septic tank installation, noting that if approval is not received by the applicant, development would be precluded or a sewer system installation would be required. Mr. Smith inquired if approval of the subject rezone would allow construction of apartments in adjacent areas. The Examiner advised that the option for rezone application is available to all members of the public. Mr. Smith reiterated his objection to the subject rezone which is adjacent to his property. Responding was: Michael L. Smith 3402 N.E. 7th Street Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Smith discussed factors which contribute to the unique and stable character of the area, including substantial stands of trees and large lots. He clarified the specific area of the neighborhood which consists of N.E. 7th Street extending from Monroe Avenue N.E. to Queen Avenue N.E. , and objected to comments contained in Section L.8 (Planning Department Analysis) of Exhibit #1, which state that the subject area is in transition from relatively large lots to smaller lots as evidenced by division of Lots 1 & 4 of Block 1 to 12,000 square feet, Lot 7 of Block 2 to 14,000 square feet, and Lot 1 of Block 2 to 6,000 square feet. Mr. Smith advised that the area is not in transition and corrected the previous figures to 30,000 square feet for Lot 1 of Block 1, 20,000 square feet in Lot 4 of Block 1, 40,000 square feet in two lots under one ownership contained in Lot 1 of Block 2, and division of Lot 7 of Block 2 into two lots of approximately 14,000 square feet. He referenced Section 4-3014.B. of the Hearing Examiner Ordinance Circumstances found to apply to grant a rezone) , which states that the property is potentially zoned for the reclassification being requested pursuant to the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan, and indicated concern regarding the impact of the word "potential." Mr. Smith advised his opinion that approval of the subject rezone would establish a precedent and would instigate further subdivision in the area which would result in increased noise and imminent removal of existing trees. Responding was: Paul J. Crutchfield 3613 N.E. 7th Street Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Crutchfield, one of the original residents in the neighborhood, expressed objection to the proposed rezone due to establishment of a precedent for future subdivision, and supported retention of the character of the neighborhood in its existing condition. Responding was: Bruce Morgan 8732 138th Avenue S.E. Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Morgan expressed concern that approval to an R-1 zoning district would allow at least three lots within 28,000 square feet contained in the property. The Examiner advised that subdivision regulations require creation of a public street for a short plat of more than two lots. Mr. Morgan objected to approval of a rezone of property which would require further exception to the Subdivision Ordinance for a pipestem road in order to develop, and he felt that appropriate assurance does not exist that application for an additional exception of the requirement for provision of a public street would not occur to allow development of the property. Referencing Section J. (Environmental Assessment/Threshold Determination) of Exhibit #1 regarding the approval of a negative declaration conditioned upon retention of as many existing trees as possible, Mr. Morgan felt that assurance of compliance was not possible. He also felt that availability of septic systems on the property had not been properly addressed by staff. Mr. Morgan noted that because the subject site is centrally located in the neighborhood, a rezone would constitute spot March 23, 1979 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON ' REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL, APPLICANT: Steven M. Whitson FILE NO. R-312-79 LOCATION: • Vicinity of 3512 N.E. 7th Street. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests approval of a rezone from GS-i to R-1 to permit future subdivision of the subject site and construction of• a second single family residence. SUMMARY OF ' Planning Department: Approval. RECOMMENDATION: Hearing Examiner: Denial. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on March 14, 1979. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining • available information on ,file with the application, and field checking .the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on March 20, 1979 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. David Clemens, Associate Planner, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional. exhibits into the record: Exhibit #2: King County Assessor's Map Exhibit #3: Conceptual Site Plan Exhibit #4: Photographs of Subject Site (3) The Examiner asked the applicant if he concurred in Exhibit #1. Responding was: Steven M: Whitson 1817 130th N.E. Bellevue, WA 98005 Mr. Whitson was affirmed by the Examiner. He indicated his concurrence in the report, and stated that existence of dense stands of trees would reduce visual impact of the proposed structure upon surrounding residents in the area. Mr. Clemens advised receipt of a letter and petition from homeowners residing adjacent to the subject site. The letter was read into the record by the Examiner and entered as follows: Exhibit #5: Letter to Hearing Examiner from Michael L. Smith, dated March 16, 1979; and petition containing 25 signatures. The letter indicated opposition to the proposed rezone due to potential adverse impact to the unique, character of the plat of Stewart's Highland Acre Tract which contains lots of large size. It also objected to comments contained in the Planning Department report which state that the area is in a state of transition, and noted that a previous rezone request ,submitted by Harold P. Peterson had been denied by the Planning Commission and. City Council in .1976. The Examiner requested testimony in support of the application. There: was no response. He then requested testimony in opposition. Responding was: Marvin Pearson 3606 N.E. 7th Street Renton, WA 98055 , R-312-79 Page Four FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The 'request is for approval of reclassifying a 28,700 square foot, GS-1 zoned, single family lot to R-1 for future subdivision into two lots. 2. The Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues, applicable policies and provisions, findings of fact, and departmental recommendations in this matter, and is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference as set forth in full therein. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended by R.C.W. 43.21.C. , a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development and no adverse comment was expressed. 5. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity; except for sanitary sewer which must be extended from Queen Avenue N.E. 6. The proposal is compatible with the required lot area requirements of Section 4-706 R-1) of Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances. 7. Available records do not indicate that an area wide land use or zoning analysis has been accomplished other than a general Comprehensive Plan analysis conducted in 1965 in connection with adoption of the existing Comprhensive Plan. The requested zoning of R-1 for the specific property does not appear to have been specifically considered during that analysis (Section 4-3014. (A) ) . 8. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map indicates the property to potentially be Single Family Residential (Section 4-3014. (B) ) . 9. Testimony did not address the impact of public and/or private improvements upon the subject property (Section 4-3014. (C) ) . Reclassification in the vicinity occurred prior to 1963. Subdivision activity within Blocks 1 and 2 of Stewart's Highland Acre Tracts (those lots abutting and on the north and south sides of N.E. 7th Street between Monroe Avenue N.E. and Queen Avenue N.E.) appears to pre-date the existing Subdivision Ordinance. 10. Restrictions upon the plat of Stewart's Highland Acre Tracts (Exhibit #6) indicate that the minimum lot size that can be created is 6,000 or 8,000 square feet (the reproduction of the plat certificate renders precise reading difficult) . Although this restriction is not enforced by the city, the applicant per Exhibit #3 intends to divide one 28,700 square foot lot into two lots. 11. Those lots abutting N.E. 7th Street and adjacent to or across this street from the subject site consist of the same lot size of approximately 28,700 square feet Exhibit #2) . With one exception, lots with only frontage on N.E. 7th Street (not additional frontage on Monroe Avenue N.E. or Queen Avenue N.E.) possess about 28,700 square feet. The one exception is a pre-Subdivision Ordinance short plat of a 28,700 square foot lot into two lots (Lot No. 7, Block 2) . Lots fronting on Monroe Avenue N.E. and Queen Avenue N.E. are smaller lots, ranging in size from approximately 5,700 square feet to 20,000 square feet. Exhibit #6 indicates that property configurations in Blocks 1 and 2 exist as recorded in 1946, except for shortplatted Lots 3 and 7, Block 2, and rezoning to R-1 and subdivision of Lot 14, Block 1. i The immediate abutting areas surrounding this plat have been developed into approximately 6,000+ square foot lots under S-1 and GS-1 zoning. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proposal conforms to the Single Family Residential category specified in the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map; however, little guidance is provided in the Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives regarding the specific density desired in the Single Family Residential designation. Existing zoning regulations provide for densities of 7,200 square foot (R-1 and S-1) , 7,500 square foot (SR-1) and 40,000 square foot (S-1) lots, depending upon interpretation. Each of these zoning districts meets the density guideline of six units per acre of. the Comprehensive Plan for the Single Family Residential district (page 5, Section 4.B. , Density Plan, Renton Urban Area Report, July, R-312-79 Page Three zoning, unlike other rezones of property located on the periphery of a neighborhood and not requiring pipestem access to a public street. He advised the opinion of several residents of the existence of restrictive covenants restricting further subdivision of lots within the tract, and requested submittal by the applicant of substantiating documents to disprove the existence of the covenants. Responding was: Vera L. Bach 3309 N.E. 7th Street Renton, WA 98055 Mrs. Bach felt it is the responsibility of the purchaser of property to be aware of existing zoning, noting that other building sites are available which are currently zoned for the proposed use. She felt that the responsibility of adjusting to the desires of the developer should not be expected of existing residents. The Examiner requested further comments from Mr. Clemens. Responding to testimony from Mr. Michael Smith, Mr. Clemens indicated that lot sizes in adjacent properties had been reviewed, and information contained in Section L.8 of Exhibit #1 is correct and will remain as submitted. The Examiner requested further, comments from the applicant. Mr. Whitson indicated that although it is his intent to retain existing trees for visual, esthetic value, as owner of the property removal of existing trees is his option, and advised that location of the proposed residence would allow retention of many trees on the northern portion of the property. Mr. Whitson referenced comments from residents that approval of the subject rezone would establish a precedent in the neighborhood and allow further subdivision of property, and noted that if all residents oppose further rezones and subdivision of their own property, such land use changes would not occur. He reaffirmed his intent to subdivide the property into a maximum of two parcels for the purpose of constructing one additional single family residence, noting that existing conditions would preclude provision 'of a public street or several septic tanks within the site which are required if additional lots are created. He also indicated that Planning Department staff had determined the proposed zoning category following discussion with the applicant regarding his intent to construct one residence. Responding to testimony from Mrs. Bach, Mr. Whitson indicated the current unavailability of zoned, buildable single family residential lots. The Examiner requested further comments. Responding was: Elaine Hinze 763 Queen Avenue N.E. Renton, WA 98055 Mrs. Hinze was affirmed by the Examiner. She indicated that her residential lot had been rezoned to R-1 category in 1961 and access is provided to Queen Avenue N.E. However, she advised that if the subject rezone is approved, a vacant lot to the west of her property would be developed into four lots and would require pipestem access to N.E. 7th Street which would create adverse impact upon the neighborhood. The Examiner inquired if city records had revealed information regarding previous division of Lot 7 of Block 2. Mr. Clemens indicated that subdivision had occurred prior to adoption of subdivision regulations. The Examiner requested confirmation of the requirement of provision of a 50-foot right-of-way if subdivision of a lot into more than two parcels occurred. Mr. Clemens confirmed the Examiner's statement, noting that provision of a public access and cul-de-sac would possibly allow a potential increase of the original three lots into seven or eight lots. The Examiner asked Mr. Whitson if restrictive covenants had been included with a title report upon purchase of the subject property in September, 1978. Mr. Whitson researched his records and submitted a copy of the title report. The document was entered as follows: Exhibit #6: Plat restriction contained in Transamerica Title Report, dated September 21, 1978. The restriction was read into the record as follows: "No lot or portion of a. lot of the plat excepting those lots which are hereinafter restricted to business use, shall be divided and sold, or resold, or ownership changed or transferred, whereby the ownership of any portion of this plat shall be less than the area required for. the use district stated on this plat, namely 6,000 square feet for suburban use with a minimum lot width of 60 feet." The Examiner requested further comments. ' Since there were none, the hearing on File No. R-312-79 was closed by the Examiner at 10:05 a.m. R-312-79 Page Six TRANSMITTED THIS 23rd day of March, 1979 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Ron Nelson, Building Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney . Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be •filed in writing on or before April 6, 1979. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or, the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make.a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in said department. R-312-79 Page Five 1965) , (Section 4-3014. (B) ) . • 2. Sufficient evidence was presented to demonstrate that the proposed rezone was not specifically considered at or during a,previous area land •use analysis and area zoning (Section 4-3014. (A) ) . However, this finding in the affirmative must be considered together with other conclusions herein. 3. Consideration of the reclassification raises the issue of "spot. zoning" of an individual parcel within the plat of Stewart's Highland Acre Tracts: This plat appears to constitute a small neighborhood that remains substantially unchanged since subdivision in 1946. Evidence indicates that •the benefit to be derived . from the rezone accrues only to the applicant without demonstrated benefit to the public health, safety or welfare. The requested R-1 is generally inconsistent with the dominant character and development of this neighborhood. Potential harm to adjoining properties,has been indicated, although with little support. This property is a small portion of the neighborhood and constitutes an island within it. Therefore, the Examiner is led to the conclusion that the request appears to essentially comprise a spot zone.' On this basis alone the application should be denied. 4. However', the goals and policies of. the Comprehensive Plan should also be consulted. I.t seems that appropriate ". . .land use principles. . ." and "coordinated development. . :" page 9, Ibid) would suggest that most compatible with abutting development would be the retention of existing development and zoning. (Section 4-3014. (B) ) . Otherwise, R-1 would potentially be ". . .unwarranted infiltration of incompatible uses which would contribute to premature decay and obsolescence. . ." (page 17,: Objective No. 1, Land Use Report, July, 1965) . Retention of existing zoning would constitute effective control of land use. . ." (Objective No. 4, Ibid) and be the ". . . highest arid best use in such a way as to promote the best interest of the community and contribute to its overall attractiveness and desirability as a place in which Objective No. 6, page 18, Ibid) . Since the plat of Stewart's Highland Acre,Tracts was approved in 1946,, only slight modifications .have Occurred in the original configuration (See Finding No. 11) . It appears that the plat has remained in. essentially a stable condition since . approval with encroachments occurring either at. the easterly end (Lot 14, Block 1) or along the abutting properties in all directions surrounding the plat. Despite considerably more dense surrounding single family' development, the plat is essentially in the. same Configuration as adopted in 1946: This would indicate stability and potential erosion by denser zoning and. development within the plat. RECOMMENDATION: Denial of the application. ORDERED THIS 23rd day of March, 1979. i WW1,. L. R c Beeler Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 23rd day of March, 1979 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Steven M. Whitson,, 1817 130th N.E. , Bellevue, WA 98005 Marvin Pearson, 3606 N.E.' 7th Street, Renton, WA , 98055 Gerald R. Smith, 3518 N.E. 7th Street, Renton, WA 98055 Michael L. Smith, 3402 N.E. 7th Street, Renton, WA 98055 Paul J. Crutchfield, 3613 N.E. 7th Street, Renton, WA 98055 Bruce Morgan, 8732 '138th Ave. S.E. , Renton, WA 98055 Vera L. Bach, 3309 N.E. 7th Street, Renton, WA 98055 Elaine Hinze, 763 Queen Avenue N.E. , Renton, WA 98055 Gertrude. Stirn, 3613 N.E. 7th Street, Renton, WA' 98055 Patricia J. Braaten, 759 Queen Avenue N:E: , Renton, WA 98055 Maxine K. A. Cloyd, 762 Queen Avenue N.E. , Renton, WA 98055 Gerald J. Keehn, 3601 N.E. 7th Street, Renton, WA 98055 R3 B 711,r. R....2 413.. i B., , J IL. r_._.." r-.lj6SJLTf,. 7_—i s...,, I. 1 7,e.. • N • -nap .L r 'It. y -r:' • ti',t '1 7 r R_'S.r.•• tL1r t• ; ••. r • _ ,iiirp• . a. 1 ' i c 2 L• Ir.IU 1 4: • .. J + ! : Li .Ia_-_.! ,V> F..i. 1 '>` t,•1 .;a.a.I, s:s, Y t ): -,1 // _ 4.`.1.',,1. :; l,rr . oF•1.. rl--t? 14 4i.,.it :1 l r I u . •.. •• l'•1,•1Ju ...'}. ! jo` I .o. e r- • t(S, 4 c1 ., "I 1l• i. 'j • a I 4.,. .• ,d! o,•. > > , ut•S lr•W, • I, t J , :,,. `.„, L.,......) /. ./ I . t\ '.SD 4 .... J rra: TT,' l+'-- •5,. W' o r,e r s • • .. f y •i t 97' -I t •I• ( 1.'f •` , 1. , Is -.Tx( hL.l"l . !' f i4 R1•. s . >.z l' , Iai arl..c ' IRq. I i I o . 6 PIC J111 I1II' o--) -, J 1 12 • i ' Z I L. •s LI. .L1•i.. 2L11 4 tp 4. a..: ; !.:. .. 1: z: 1 . . i ' ):: 4i.?•, •,: ot„. „,. l 7RIJI: • T ; e. ,:1, , fie i . _ y....gt I i ',: —IN ..--17; '1:si•5 .. 41.L.:. .'. ... ...,,,....,• ' . t'Iy ••1.,. i.11•/ f . .1,+ T I 1 1 '. L• 7, UN GS OZ.I W oVV , •Sub I\• 2!•- Q • . r, I N •.• I _ N•E Tr 1_:11 C ••.1•i:i.l"1_.l y• I. 1 .t, .. t T--f j J u•N ,T.rr T 1 1 • I , a•.' ...'.1• Ie . .,.. ,• I•** Ire. 71 Z 2 RBI h+•• N T ..,yT 004 '.:7n',.; .,nc ` r t\. : S Y O' -,. J > I• .. j ,• •'•.• 'ti - ••, i nlIw., y{,.nI,.1''p • I J .• L '• .1 t• 1,.!• I i t' r' , I ,11 V_7.`•r4 . .``, t(.' v 0\1 ••,}_p zY 1 i•'1“ti..•• ,t" I k• ,>._`r .. •., •,Kr • • • • 1 ID I A N a ~`w' ".,":. N'""' tT•,•I N 7 ;,I 7C• ty C .y..1t •11- b. • , i 3.h1i•i.•t•• .5' .I• I a I,'.. • •• Y ut:.j' ;,•/. t vI) 2 Ir » t • . 7. 2 I 11.,.. •.•.••w.11,:i •.•••l... .ilii l.. l••1"1' _1 ,Li. li 4 ''rJrJJ` l' i .':. ..-‘.4 .1.4;.- 1.I t . . ' ° 4 e*--) i 1 1 i r i I t i G S- 1 1 R-3 1 . 1 II, i;'.,- , joi 1:1 1 L e B:1 I v''` I I I II IITI i9.i IR I Z i i i l I • t jZo I< I i f ,, J . tJ 1_J -- l I 1 .1...-1 W, •. f4E ITN lT I i I STEVEN .M . WHITSON I R-312-79 i Ii i: E APPLICANT STEVEN M . WHITSON TOTAL AREA ±28 ,700 square ft. PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via N . E . 7th Street I t EXIS1ING ZONING • GS- 1 , General Classification District An existing single family residence is. located on the southerlyEXISTINGUSE portion of the site; remainder •undeveloped. PROPOSED USE Single Family Residential Single Family Residential s COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN 9 i COMMENTS rt..ra.:.aa.P .a7[. ..•.•aP"YPG+',T::•"'-'r•; ":', -. 1 8 i .; i ,... 1--• 1----lf:1;..; I; .: u : . , I. t 1 i J,2. VI., 1.• ..' 140op.," t •Z. •• "\ ,f :.• ,r''(,•‘",'• ,,' 45. •:.! ' NI' .•.1.‘ ' i , . ' ,•.„i 1 : eg" 11.EITH • ..,•"--;.' ...t -P: "4f .71 s••.' 1 .•'...'1."...1 -• ' '•',:1 ." I '• , • •; I- 4',itri$ 4,4041:07j' I'. .''''.:*?;-•*#VI:1' i4 ' -7ii,'it'V;5'41., ••t.,47- :.ti• ,. , ..•:` , 0' 2 1 1 - ' ") 41 - '• 1 1 Y ..1 1 . ' ile, 04. 7,7,7'... ••••'i _.•1 !.•4 i,•,,, - c• 4 4 ph, •.. er • • „NI 3 1 — 1--,""4-4: 4. U i r •'..,,,',,,, 1/4 - 1 i r -411111V.i4 - i Se.... V .t,‘„-isc'galt.•... , L-. - 1. 0 i•i 4 ralfillir . aZIIII t-) t t •..• -,,. qk 1; 1 .• E . • . - , : •••• 1"•• i.1/41.., ; .:„.„t ..• ,,- t,,,.,. ..:':..'.1.-,;,c'0,,•.;;•.;,' :,::;7.4,..;":104, 4,:, • -t- ' • •.. t'`':•-.0...•4• -,,,i• ,,.i-r..!.'t-',i: .t:., ...'..,0-;,.0 :1';'4!"1::.. 4.,,•'...1 . -_ - ... ' '',...;'..* ,?,...1X,i.F. •-, ' '7, •'' L.d:' rarr-..-T.,.aanammum s. I d* V44,i A.Y I4 . r4 -I 41 0 1 itl, i 4 „,. 3 rr3 11...., th.. NE. T 1.1 r . 1 117‘•, 7,:i.-i r•I..,•-.,. 46 7...ta • ' •i. • .:,1,,014,,,TO Vt. ' eiP;*'ArAll , , ..• ',• 461 f,":' ". "rr I,..,:-.1 4.i ItP... e". r.. r.. I 1' ':1. k.,.I.:;..•;.4,cle t • c 1 r. / , I ,'•',. e P.( .•, 'VI I 1:`... 0"*-- a• 41. °If*: t •• ,‘;' t....." i..8 ' tt.; •-.."- ' iW7e,.:41,1WRIVIgilMMIROP"'" I 7'1% '.i1,0., r, I I STEVEN WHIM a AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King Marilyn J. Petersen being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 23rd day of March 19 79 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in 'the below-entitled application or petition. k Subscribed and sworn this ab day of cc 19 -0 . V\ • k Notary Public in and fo-r; :the -State. of Washington, residing,'.at:.Rent n; . ' Application, Petition or Case: Steven J. Whitson; R-312-79 The minutes contain a £Lst ol5 the panties os necond) OF I 0 ° THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON.WASH. 98055 oNAL CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9. 0 O L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593 09. 1E0 SEpt° P April 9, 1979 Mr. Steven M. Whitson 1817-130th N.E. Bellevue, WA 98005 RE: File No. R-312-79; . Steven M. Whitson Request for Rezone. Dear Mr. Whitson: This is t notify you that the above referenced request, which was denied ,a noted in the Examiner's report of March 23, '1979, has not been pealed within the time period established by ordinance. erefore, this application is considered final and will be submitted to the City Clerk this date for permanent filing. Sincer ly, L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk