Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA82-030
BEGINNING OF FIL F sue , i,i- aivillvau ln„, FILE TI 1 ' 1 r I 0 11 111110. 1 I IA i 4 i 4.. a 1 t I 1 4 1 1I I i'1 , 1 I I t''If 1; aa ja i. ' r I ' r i. ,: -" : 12friFi Fi r' ':' ',i x S C; K 1 _ 1 - _. i, .t:. ':•1 r I} s 5, : i li'I !'. `r.•( i. ,:'j' 1 r.,.k I'. Frl v' is it rat" ;it'. 1 I. t., ,V:.r'1 P.:\{ y' rt: s. :-'::1:;;,;,, it is `E_ .li,. i . c ' A-rli• irN F 1 i II 11 I''', Applicant DONALD E. McWILLIAMS File No. R-030-82 I' i i Project Name SAME r'* Property Location East side of Union Avenue N.E. between ;, N.E. 4 h Street and N.E. 6th Street (extended) . I 6-10-82HEARINGEXAMINER: Date i Recommendation Denial i Req./Rec. Date Received Date Response i„ 1`;I. Appeal - Date Received .'' I,L,y,p. c3- gS P, ii i, Counc i 1 Approval - Date9.DO_A__ .1 q - C . I Ordinance/Resolution # ?j ( Date I. M lar to forRecordingYCounty I, Mylar Recording # e:'j.t; 6.0 Remarks: a-, Yr. 1; 1, 1 A i'1 4? r ' t1JV' (-4,- AN ORDINANCEPEITIH .•. C I T Y O1F1RENTOXN,. WASHINGTONrCHA;NN G. ING- THE ZONINGg<,C*-: SIFICATION 40F:,CERTAIN Affi avit of Pu lication PROPERTIESWITHINTHE: CITY OF RENTON FRO i GENERAL :CLA`SSIFIGA-=I 1 TION (G)TO.RESIDENCE STATE OF W SHINGTON DISTRICT.(R=3) (R-030=82 COUNTY F KING ss• McWilliams)..' ' ,' WHEREAS 'wide!'Chap ter 7,Title IV(Building Rego- 1 lations) of.Ordinance No. 1`628 k evin •. t e• Code of Audrey eJotey being first duly sworn on a Cerieral Ordinaric rod'theI 1 City';of Rento !tom emeriti.' oath,deposes ands ys that.0.)30..is the fsr'IE3:, Clerk of 1 ed;=and the µcps re THE DAILY RECO D CHRONICLE,a news I aper published six(6)times a 1ports adopted In conjunction thepropertyweek.That said ne spaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been therewith, R for more than six months prior to the da$e of publication referred to, hereinbelow described has printed and published in the English language continually as a newspaper heretofore been zoned as published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington,and it is I,General Classification (G); now and during all'of said time was printediin an office maintained at the and aforesaid place of publication of said new paper.That the Daily Record 1• WHEREAS a proper peti- Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior tion for change of zone Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, j classification of said proper- I ty has been filed with the Building and Zoning Depart- Washington.That:he annexed is a Ord• nonee... 'o.* 3651 I merit on or about March 30, f 1982, which petition was duly referred to the Hearing iiI.3157 Examiner for investigation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having as it was ublished in regular issues(and I been duly considered bythenotinsupplemen:form of said newspape ) once each issue for a period Hearing Examiner and said zoning request having been denied arid the matter hav- of consec tive issues,commencing on the ing been appealed to the i City Council of the City of Renton and said City Coun- p cil having reversed the Hear-7'a1l.day;of Alu!'1 19....4?.,and ending the ing Examiner's decision and said zoning request being in' conformity with"the•City's; e,{,b:day of ji1 tlet 19...$ both dates Comprehensive Plan, asl irr77cTTusive, and the t such newspaper was regularly distribute to its sub— scribers during .11 of said period. That the full amount of the fee Council have duly consi- dered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties hay- charged for the foregoing publication i the sum of Asa.05.9 which ing been heard appearing in has been paid in ull at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the I support thereof or in opposi- first insertion a d per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent 1 lion thereto, NOW THERE- insertion. ; FORE 1 I THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO OR- l/DAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I:ThefollowingfCOLdescribedpropertyin the 1000 eslol 8 L gi8gntid Nei Deo 8 ••• Subscribed and worn to before me this 16tih day of xojkliwej y •• 1"9. rna,: 5UPAIRle—33YHH 1HJI3 r1d1sPlo-as pd r sa),,, r vxxx.himx.m0:93;1t - Notary Public in I nd for the State of Washington, I `- r58 • uangnd:'4M1 residing at Nwit King County. oW aanoH Al NO Passed by the Legislature,1955,knowI as Senate Bill 281,effective June 9th, 1955. Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, 1- adopted by he newspapers of the State. 56.L'Bald M - I Gab 0334 4I N!- VN#87 Revised 5/2 1 tip 411/ Renton Ci-y Council Augustl23 , 1982 Page Li OLD BUSINESS continued I 1 Community Community Services Committee Chairman Reed presented a committee Services report recommending authorization to proceed with submittal of a Committee request o King County for use of remaining Block Grant funds for Rainier Avenue completion of Phase 2 of the Rainier Avenue Corridor Bikeway. If Corridor successfdl in obtaining funding, Committee recommended implementa- Bikeway tion of Phase 2 including: 1 . Providing street route signage from Rainier Avenue South to Hardile Avenue SW, to SW Seventh Street to Lind Avenue SW, to SW 16th Street for sidewalk walking or on-street bicycle route to Fort Dent and the Interurban Trail . 2. Providing a paved pedestrian and bicycle route on the surface under the railroad tracks at the Black River Pump Plant into Fort Dent west from Monster Road. 3. If fu ds remain, providing miscellaneous shoulder widening on SW 161th Street. MOVED BY EED, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE REPORT. Ed Hayduk, Housing and Community Develop- ment Coordinator, explained the area under the railroad tracks at the Black River Pump Plant is on an existing maintenance road at the back of Fort Dent Park in Tukwila; the park was built by King County and is maintained by Seattle. MOTION CARRIED. One-Half Councilman Stredicke chose not to excercise option to call for Percent reconsideration by Council of the one-half percent sales tax. Optional The hugh (deficit that would result from withdrawal of this tax Sales Ta and the possibility of non-passage of another form of taxation to decrease that deficit prompted Stredicke's action. Councilman Stredicke stressed his feelings had not changed regarding the negative aspects of imposing this tax on Renton (while neighboring communities remained unchanged) and the manner in which this optional tax program had been set up that King County could impose and collect. the tax on the city if the city does not adopt the tax first. Planning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Rockhill presente a Developmen committee report recommending the Donald E. McWilliams Preliminary McWilliams Plat (File PP-031-82) matter be remanded back to the Hearing Examiner Preliminary for his report and recommendation. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECONDED BY Plat Appea' HUGHES, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING RIND PP-031-82 DEVELOPME 'T COMMITTEE. CARRIED. 1 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS 1 Ways and Means Ways and eans Committee Chairman Stredicke recommended second and Committee final rea ing of the following ordinance: 1 Ordinance :,653 An ordinance was read amending portions of Chapter 7 and Chapter 22, OutsideStcrage Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance 1628 entitled "Code of Facilities General Ordinances" relating to outside storage facilities. MOVED l BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY ROCKHILL, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS I READ AND SUMMARY. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. First Reading The Ways and Means Committee recommended first reading of the following 1 ordinances: SE 18th (Street An ordinance was read vacating a portion of SE 18th Street (VAC 5-81 - Vacationl Rolling Hihls Village Homes Association, Inc. ) . MOVED BY STREDICKE, VAC 5-811 SECONDED BY CLYMER, THIS MATTER BE REFERRED BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR 1 THREE WEEKS. CARRIED. (Vacation fee paid to city. ) I Municipal An ordinance was read providing for appropriation and transfer of Court Fund funds from Excess Revenue/Current Fund to Current Fund/Municipal Appropriatian Court in the amount of $11 ,000. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE RULES AND ADVANCE THIS ITEM TO SECOND AND FINAL READING. CARRIED. 11110 1 r a . . Renton it CouncilY August 3, 1982 Page 3 CONSEN AGENDA The following items are adopted by one motion which follows the items included. Surpluil Finance Department, Purchasing, requested public hearing be set Equipm:nt for 9/13/82 regarding auction sale of surplus property and police Auction evidence items on 9/25/82 at 10:00 a.m. at the City Shops, First Avenue North and North Williams Avenue. All items have been sur- plused and are no longer in use. Council concur in public hearing date and refer to Ways and Means Committee. May Cr'-ek Public Works Department submitted right-of-way relinquishment agree- Inter ange ment Letter of Understanding from the Department of Transportation regarding vicinity of May Creek Interchange and turning back right- of-way. Authorize Mayor and City Clerk to sign letter of understanding . Signal' Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering, submitted agreement be- Impro -ment - tween City of Renton and Boeing Commercial Airplane Company regarding North Eighth improvement of existing signal system at North Eighth Street and Park and P.rk Avenue North. City of Renton to provide design, plans and specifica- Avenuq North tions, and construction inspection; Boeing will provide $46,000 for cost of materials and labor. Council approve project and authorize Mayor and City Clerk to execute agreement. Claim for Claim for damages in the amount of $7,000+ filed by Daniel J. Loucks Damages - for injury/damages caused by alleged malfunctioning traffic light CL 46 82 at intersection of NE Sunset and Duval NE (4/28/82) . Refer to City Attorney and insurance carrier. Court Case Court case filed by Betty J. and Richard J. Stauch, Jr. , versus Betty' J./ Valley Cement Construction and the City of Renton in the amount of Richa d J. 150,000 for injury/damages sustained in auto accident allegedly Stau caused by raised manhole cover one block north of 27th Place and Talbot Road (10/21/79) . Refer to City Attorney and insurance carrier. Cons, t Agenda MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA Appr•iIed AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORR SPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS Fourth Annual Letter from Steve Orton, Xerox Corporation Community Involvement Xero1 Fun Program, 6400 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, requested use of SW Run 34th Street from Longacres, left onto Lind Avenue and left again on SW 16th Street back to Longacres on 9/18/82. This will be the date of the Fourth Annual Three-Mile Fun Run and 10K Run to benefit special children - gifted, retarded and handicapped. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY REED, THIS CORRESPONDENCE BE REFERRED TO THE ADMINISTRATION FOR ACTT ' CARRIED. Fir Mayor Shinpoch paraphrased a letter from a local family who had lost Depa tment and their infant recently to Sudden Infant Death Syndrome. This family Aid 1 rew had written commending the fire department and aid crew for the Co -nded excellent response (physically and emotionally) to their crisis. Those firemen involved: Lt. Chuck Ankeny, David Thorson, Robert Deines, Tom Parmelee and Henry Dykes. OLD BUSINESS Uti ities Utilities Committee Chairwoman Mathews presented a committee report Committee recommending acceptance of the recommendation of the Public Works BilAward = Department to accept the low bid of Grant Construction in the amount 84t1 Avenue of $85,238.88 for Phase I of 84th Avenue Co-op Water System. Commit- Co-? Water tee also recommends Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute Sys em contract documents. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL APPROVE THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE REPORT AND AWARD CONTRACT. CARRIED. 1 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT AUGUST 23, 1982 AP'EAL FILED BY DONALD E. McWILLIAMS - R-030-82 and PP-031-82 Th= Planning and Development Committee in considering the appeal on the McWilliams matter considered only the rezone issue and did not consider the plat . The Hearing Examiner has taken the necessary testimony to make his recommendation on the plat and it would be the best procedure to remand the question of the plat back to the Hearing Examiner for his report and recommendation. Rbnay hill ,, Chairman John Reed i. tiLJ Ro er ughes V.e/ 9 Sf I' ( ' fr<~ o TH'E CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500 9, o t'August 24, 1982 A4TFD SEP 01, To: Fred Kaufman, Land Use Hearing Examiner Fr•m: Maxine Motor, Acting City Clerk Su•ject: Donald E. McWilliams Preliminary Plat PP 031-82 Th= Renton City Council at its regular meeting of August 23, 1982 has re anded the abovelcaptioned plat back to the Hearing Examiner for report and recommendation. A copy of the Planning and Development Committee report is enclosed for your information. The City Council concurred in the report. pF R4 v, o THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 rn BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500 09A Pam_0 9gTFD EP-C August 5 , 1982 Arnett & Assoc' s 1811 125th SE Bellevue, WA 98005 RE : City of Renton - Ordinance No . 3651 McWilliams Rezone 030-82 Gentlemen: The Renton City Council at its regular meeting of August 2, 1982 has adopted Ordinance No. 3651 rezoning your property from General Classification District (G) to Residence District R-3) . A copy of the above-referenced Ordinance is enclosed. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON so• Maxine E . Motor Acting City Clerk MEM:db ENC: 1 e 7/6- 7216 /age 9&O 33 CITY OF. RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO . 3651 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPEIRTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM GENERAL CLASSIFICATION (G) TO RESIDENCE DISTRICT R-3)' (R-030-82 - McWilliams) WHEREAS under Chapter 7 , Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No . 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of thre City of Renton" , as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore. been zonedas General Classification (G) ; and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Building and Zoning Department on or about March 30 . 1982 , which petition was duly referred to the Hearing xaminer for investigation, study and public hearing , and a public hearing having peen held thereon on or about June 1 , 1982 , and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zon ng request having been denied and the matter having been appealc to the, C. ty Council of the City of Renton and said City Council having reversed the Hearing Examiner ' s decision and said zoning request being in confo mity with the City' s Comprehensive Plan , as amended, and the City Cou cil having duly considered all matters relevant thereto , and all patties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in oppositio thereto , NOW THEREFORE HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOW* : ECTION I : The following described property in the City of Renton ''is hereby rezoned to Residence District (R-3) as hereinbelow I specified; the Building and Zoning Director is hereby authorized and directed o change thelmaps of the Zoning Ordinance , as amended , to evidence .aid rezoning , to-wit : gee Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof s if fully seat forth herein. ) I I Said property being located at east side of Union Avenue N. E. between N. E. 4th Street and N.E . 6th Street (extended) ) . SECTION II : This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage , approval and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 2nd day of August, 19.82 . Maxiie Motor , Acting City Cler APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 2nd day o' August,. 1982. U 0.Abcih o) •S %4OCh) Barbara Y. ainpoch, Mayor Approve. as to form: I v • •i Lawrence J. Wa en, City Attorney Date of 'ublication : August 6, 1982 II I Ordinance No. 3651 EXHIBIT "A" REZONE NO. R-030-82 (McWILLIAMS REZONE) The South 132 feet of the North 431 feet of the Northwest quarter of the Sout west quarter of 'the Southwest quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, . Rang 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington. Exce.t the West 30 feet thereof for road purposes. i I I it Renton`C i ty pou nc i l r_ August 2, 1982 Page 2 I Consent Agenda continued I Claim for Claim for damaages in the amount of $989.73 filed by Mark C. Brewer Damages for injuries sustained in a diving accident at Coulon Park 5/31/82 CL 41-82 alleging no warning signs, supervision or lifeguards. Refer to City Attorney and insurance carrier. Claim for ! Claim for damages in the amount of $20 filed by Rhonda M. Whitten for Damages I loosened tooth sustained while playing ball at Tiffany Softball Field CL 43-82 7/13/82. Refer to City Attorney and insurance carrier. Claim for Claim for damages in the amount of $286.54 filed by Cecil H. Evoy for Damages water damage to basement ceiling on 7/14/82 alleging water pressure CL 42-82 surge caused by Renton Water Works crew. Refer to City Attorney and insurance carrier. Consent Agenda MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND BY TRIMM, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS Approved PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS Planning/ ! Letter from John B. Rabel , President, Star Machinery Company, 241 South Engineering Lander Street, Seattle, commended the attitudes of the Planning and Commendation) Engineering D Ipartments of the City of Renton. OLD BUSINESS' I Planning and, Planning and Development Committee Chairman Rockhill presented committee Development ,! report finding the Hearing Examiner in error in Conclusion 4 in his Committee decision of 5/24/82 with his reliance upon the standards of the Green EBB Developers River Valley Comprehensive Plan rather than the provisions of the Zoning R 026-82 Code regarding landscaped setbacks. Committee report (unsigned b Coun- Appeal cilman Reed) recommended Council modify conditions imposed upon t e re- classification to provide for a landscaped five-foot setback from Grady Way and all of the property lines except for Southwest 12th Street which should be a landscaped ten-foot setback by stipulation of the app llant. Committee further recommended that, upon recording of Restrictive Covenant, setting forthl the setbacks, the Restrictive Covenants previously recorded in relation to Parcel B be removed. MOVED, BY ROCKHILL, SECOND BY HUGHES, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOP ENT COMMITTEE. Councilmen Reed and Stredicke questioned variance from the Green River Vlalley Comprehensive Plan. Councilman Rockhill explained that this property was zoned single-family originally, but the five-foot setback would! now conform to almost every other property in this area on Grady Way. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke recommended second and final Committee readings of the following ordinances: Ordinance 3650 An ordinance I' was read vacating a portion of streets and alleys in an Earlington Woods area south of Southwest Sunset Boulevard and north of Milwaukie Railroad Street Vacation line within Earlington Addition including portions of Maple Avenue SW, VAC 1-79 1 Southwest Fifth Street and Stevens Avenue SW (VAC 1-79) . MOVED BY CF/CHG, Int° l . STREDICKE, SECOND BY CLYMER, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: Sunpointe ALL AYES. CA'!RRIED. Ordinance 3651 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of certain McWilliams properties wilthin the City of Renton from General Classification (G) to Rezone Residence Disitrict (R-3) (McWilliams Rezone R 030-82) . MOVED BY HUGHES, R 030-82 SECOND BY CLYMER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS PRESENTED. ROLL CALL: 5 AYES: CLYMER, HUGHES, ROCKHILL, REED, TRIMM; 1 NO: STREDICKE. CARRIED Stredicke opposed extension of multiple-family on Union Avenue, claiming single-family' area. I I RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting August 2 , 1982 Municipal Building Monday , 8 00 P . M . Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORIER Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL iF EARL CLYMER, Council President; ROBERT J. HUGHES, RANDALL ROCKHILL,. COUNCIL ME BERS RICHARD M. STREDICKE, JOHN W. REED AND THOMAS M. TRIMM. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND BY HUGHES, COUNCILWOMAN MATHEWS BE EXCUSED. CARRIED. CITY STAFF', BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Mayor; LAWRENCE WARREN, City Attorney; MICHAEL IN ATTENDA CE PARNESS, Administrative Assistant; MAXINE E. MOTOR, Acting City Clerk; ALAN WALLIS, Chief of Police; JOHN WEBLEY, Parks and Recreation Director. PRESS GREG ANDERSON, Renton Record Chronicle MINUTE APPI'OVAL MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND BY ROCKHILL, APPROVE COUNCIL MINUTES OF JULY 26, 1982 AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. AUDIENCE •OMMENT Alain Bourdoiseau, 1915 NE 27th, addressed the Council regarding signing confusion at Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park. Mr. Bourdoiseau praised the beauty of the park, but questioned what he felt to be complicated sign/parking systems. Parks and Recreation Director Webley explained that a bid opening for new park signs would take place 8/03/82 which will replace present signs with a more desirable sign system, needed to control parking and prevent possible ticketing and/or towing of illegally parked vehicles. Parking at the boat launch area of Coulon Park was ex- plained: In stalls 1-100, any vehicle/boat trailer may park by paying the $2 fee or by displaying a City of Renton Resident sticker. Stalls 101-122 are reserved for City of Renton Resident sticker holders only. Parks Director Webley stated that this system was devised to provide citi - zens of Renton, paying taxes for this park, additional access to parking. To obtain a Resident Sticker, citizens of Renton pay an annual fee of $5 3 for senior citizens) . Mr. Bourdoiseau was invited to attend the next meeting of the Park Board and to meet with Parks Director Webley regarding his ideas for the park. CONSENT •GENDA The following items are adopted by one motion which follows the items included: Appeal- - I An appeal has been filed by Richard U. Chapin, Attorney at Law, for Monterey Terrace/ Monterey Terrace/ERADCO of the Hearing Examiner's Decision of 6/25/82 ERADCO for approval of a Preliminary Planned Unit Development of 425 single- PPUD 021, 80 family attached and multiple-family housing units east and north of AAD 037-, 2 SR 169, south of Monterey Terrace and Mt. Olivet Cemetery and west of the Bonneville Power right of way (PPUD 021-80/AAD 037-82) . Refer to Planning and Development Committee. Hillcre Housing Authority of the City of Renton submitted a petition signed by Terrace; 52 residents of Hillcrest Terrace requesting speed limit reduction to Petitio 15 mph on one block of Hillcrest Lane NE, bordered by Harrington Avenue NE and Kirkland Avenue NE. Refer to Traffic Engineering Department and Transportation Committee (as requested by Councilman Stredicke) . Court C1se - A court case has been filed by Gary and Judy Torgerson seeking reversal Gary an. of the denial by the Board of Adjustment of their appeal regarding con- Judy To gerson struction of a deck and hot tub at their home at 1320 Lake Youngs Way SE. Refer to City Attorney. 11 WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT AUGUST 2, 1982 ORDINANC1S The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for second and fjina reading: S reet Vacation in Earlington Woods - VAC 1-79 McWilliams Rezone - R-03-82 RECLASSI ' ICATION REQUEST (Referred 7/12/82) The Ways and Means Committee recommends Council authorize the Mayor to proceed ith the three reclassifications as requested by the Personnel Department for Engineering Supervisor and Public Works Field Superinten- dent positions to salary range 17 and Parks Maintenance Supervisor to Grade:i11 . The Committee further recommends that the effective date of the increases be July 1 , 1982 for the Parks Maintenance Supervisor and the Engineering Supervisor and April 1 , 1982 for the Public Works Field Super- i ntendent. tev Richard Stredicke, C airman n Rober ughes RandyRock 11 1 1 T i MEMORANDUM 1 TO axine E. Motor, Acting City Clerk DATE 7/28/82 FROM,' i • bdoul Gafour. Engineering Specialist 1 1 SUBJ'IEC McWilliams - Rezone R-030-82 (from G to R-3) i Per you, request, attached please find the legal description presented as Exhibit "A" for the ordinance of the subject rezone. i 1 II Very truly yours, 1 1 A doul Gafour d I AG/dar, i Attachme t I I 1 I I i i 1 i 1 i I I lI 1. I 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1i I I I 1 EXHIBIT "A" REZONE NO. R-030-82 (McWILLIAMS REZONE) T e South 132 feet, of the North 431 feet of the Northwest quarter of the So thwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 10, Township 23 N orth, Ra ge 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington. I Ex ept the West 30 feet thereof for road purposes. 1 0 OFFICE of the CITYCLERK00z200MillAvenueSouth HU (7- 111- 424---i 0": -•'`:-.;;.1.1/2!.;,;:=:.-----'• o ....0 Renton,Washington 98055 fill i 0 P i‘ k JUN 2 4 82 ':':!.:(-r,? E 0 ri 01ec94„ 0 sE„ so 2437 i , N55 etp4i /.07 7c0 iVo '• 4°: 5) `-''' 1111 ,.....!. YA.S\A•A AO 41/ZU ij'47c-5:1-' L‘ nt•• a> `ki.i0 /• 0 __, CO 4441 it1/0 a) t\.> c'.( 1.,IVOr /. .V •ft)'' Mr. G rge Spendiff cle°Zr2,--.!° 807 ion Ave NE g' Rent6n Wa 98056 11ABI.F.<!---7- 3:,--• •,, ....., .', 141' li . 3...0.,.. c• OF R 4 4C, „ o THE CITY OF RENTON P ® z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 n I, o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD C.M.C. D' Ao CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500 44. 947- SEPS June 23, 1982 I j APPEAL FILED BY DONALD E. McWILLIAMS RE: Appeal of Land Use Examiner' s Decision Dated June 10, 1982. Rez.ne Request - # R-030-82. TO P- rties of Record: Pilrs ant to Title 4, Chapter 30, City Code, written appeal of Land Use Hearing Examiner' s decision has been filed with the City Clerk, along with the proper fee of $25.00. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeal and. other pertinent docu ents will be reviewed by the Council ' s Planning and Development Comm ttee and will be considered by the City Council when the matter is r:ported out of committee. Plea•e contact the Council Secretary 235-2586, for date and time of the 'ommittee and council meetings, should you desire to attend. Your• very truly, CITY OF RENTON or, /, , Q /4.1 Delo es A. Mead, C.M.C. City Clerk DAM/ s I I f i I I Renton CityCouncil l July 26, 1982 i Page 4 I' Utilities Committee continued 1 I I I Cascade Sewer ments and LID formation, and, if approved, to issue right-of-way District 1[ construction permits and develop an interagency agreement to provide ULID 62 for transfer 'lof the completed sewers within Renton. MOVED BY MATHEWS, continued ' SECOND BY TRIMM, CONCUR IN UTILITIES COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Water Utilities Committee Chairwoman Mathews presented committee report District 58 recommending 'directing the Administration to investigate transfer of 1 water service from Water District 58 to Renton in the vicinity of Rolling Hillsl/Tiffany Park neighborhoods by negotiation with Water District 58. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECOND BY TRIMM, CONCUR IN UTILITIES COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. , 1 CHG Councilman Stredicke inquired regarding citations and/or fines issued Citations in connection' with the CHG/Sunpointe operation. City Attorney Warren responded that the paperwork is being processed and will be filed with the court with a possibility of 40 citations including fines of up to I 500. per citaltion. Mr. Stredicke noted this developer is having similar problems in other developments near Renton and urged close developer supervision in the future. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTION Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke recommended second and final Committee readings of the following ordinances: I Ordinance 3648 An ordinance was read approving and confirming the assessments and LID 317 assessment roil of Local Improvement District 317 for the construction Assessment Roll and installation of an eight-inch water line and appurtenances in the vicinity of South 132nd Street and South Langston Road. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND BY ROCKHILL, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS PRESENTED. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. I Ordinance 36149 An ordinance was read imposing an excise tax on sale of real estate, Real Estate 1 providing forlthe collection thereof, limiting the use of the proceeds Transfer Tax therefrom andlfixing penalties for violation of. Tax to be one-quarter of one percent of the selling price. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND BY ROCKHILL, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS PRESENTED. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES! CARRIED. j First Readings The Ways and Means Committee recommended first reading of the following ordinance: McWilliams 'I An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of certain Rezone I properties within the City of Renton from General Classification (G) 030-82 I to Residence District (R-3) . MOVED BY REED, SECOND BY ROCKHILL, CONCUR I IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT AND REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. VOUCHER APPROVAL The Ways and Means Committee recommended approval of Vouchers 40845 through 411001', in the amount of $582,183. 13 having received departmental certificationithat merchandise and/or services have been received or rendered. Vouuchers 40840 through 40844 machine voided. MOVED BY I STREDICKE, SECOND BY CLYMER, CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE VOUCHERS. CARRIED. I NEW BUSINESS,1 Political Councilman St;-edicke inquired regarding the city sign code as it con- Signs cerns political advertising. City Attorney Warren responded that political signs are classified as temporary and have a duration of 60 days, but must be removed ten days after the election unless it was a primary election. Mayor Shinpoch reported that policing of political signs would hold a priority directly relative to city staff and time available. i I 1RentonCi Council July 26, 1982 Page 3 I Appeal by Mt. Olivet Cemetery Appeal . ROLL CALL: 3 AYES: TRIMM, REED, HUGHES; Mt. Olive ' 4 NOS: CLYMER, MATHEWS, STREDICKE, ROCKHILL. MOTION FAILED. SUBSTITUTE Cemetery 1 MOTION BY REED, SECOND BY HUGHES, Refer the matter back to the Hearing SP 012-82 Examiner for review of the Colt Appeal in light of the Segale*decision. continued ROLL CALL: 3 AYES: TRIMM, REED, HUGHES; 4 NOS: CLYMER, MATHEWS, STREDICKE, ROCKHILL. MOTION FAILED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND BY CLYMER, TO DENY THE APPEAL AND UPHOLD THE HEARING EXAMINER' S DECISION. Mr. Colt called attention to Councilman Clymer's statement that all applicable city ordinances would be in force and enforced. ROLL CALL: 4 AYES: CLYMER, MATHEWS, STREDICKE, ROCKHILL; 3 NOS: TRIMM, REED, HUGHES. MOTION CARRIED. *Segale Decision (SP 032-82) Audience omment continue• Marian Jordan, 13265 - 89th Avenue South, addressed the Council to West Hill oppose the West Hill Pump Station Annexation explaining prior unsuccess- Pump Station ful attempt to annex residence. Public Hearing having been closed, Ms. Annexation Jordan was instructed to contact the King County Boundary Review Board Oppositiln for further information. CONSENT IGENDA The following items are adopted by one motion which follows the items included: South Talbot Utilities Engineering recommended project and final pay estimate be Hill Pump approved and retainage of $18,433.85 be released after 30 days if all iStation ' nal taxes have been paid and no liens have been filed on W-600 (CAG 017-81) Payment South Talbot Hill Pump Station - Teem Ventures, Inc. Council concur. Zoning d Policy Development Department submitted a preliminary analysis of cost Subdivision of processing zoning and subdivision applications recommending revisions Fees to the fee structure commensurate with the city's actual cost of pro- viding the service. Refer to Planning and Development Committee. FoMayor Shinpoch delcared period of August 5-7, 1982, DAV get Proclamation from y p Me Not" Days as "Disabled American Veterans Forget-Me-Not Days". ConsentiAgenda MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND BY HUGHES, ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. Approved CARRIED. CORRESPIIINDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS Plannin;; Letter from Planning Commission Chairman Michael G. Porter (by David Association Clemens) requested Council approval to proceed with sponsorship of the 1983 Fa 1 1983 Fall Conference of the Planning Association of Wash' hgton. MOVED Conference BY CLYMER, SECOND BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE REQUEST OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. CARRIED. i OLD BU•'I NESS 4 Utiliti -s Utilities Committee Chairwoman Mathews presented committee report Commit ee approving the transfer of $20,000 from May Creek/Honey Creek/Kennydale Honey ( reek Sanitary Sewer Reserve Account to current working funds to obtain Survey ng professional land surveying services for the Honey Creek Sanitary Sewers. Committee also recommended referral to Ways and Means Committee for proper ordinance. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECOND BY TRIMM, CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF UTILITIES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. 1983-81, Utilities Committee Chairwoman Mathews presented committee report Capital approving the proposed Capital Improvement Programs and recommended Improvement a public meeting be held to accept public comments. MOVED BY MATHEWS, Progra1 SECOND BY CLYMER, CONCUR IN THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE REPORT AND SET AUGUST 23, 1982, AS THE DATE OF THE PUBLIC MEETING. CARRIED. Casca• - Sewer Utilities Committee Chairwoman Mathews presented committee report Distri t - approving Administration' s recommendation to provide oversite on city ULID 62 residents and property owners affected by this ULID, to review assess- I I L7 u II PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT TO: 'enton City Council July 9 , 1982 FROM: Planning and Development Couliiittee RE : ppeal filed by Donald E. McWilliams 030-82 and PP-031-82 The P anning and Development Committee has considered the appeal of 'Do ald E . McWilliams and recommends that the City Council revere the Hearing Examiner' s decision and grant the rezone to R-3 . The Committee makes this recommendation based upon the folio ing findings : 1 . Finding of Fact No . 10 indicates that the single family homes in the immediate vicinity are stable and likely to remain for the foreseeable future. The Committee finds instead that those homes are in an area which is in transition and are therefore not stable but transitional uses . 2 . Finding . of Fact No . 8 indicates that the land use earm enty p stehsi. s Thtae ifi ndin g cmm ne ale r ansde nfce error . However , Conclusion No . 2 and No . 4 would indicate that the Comprehensive Plan designation should be followed. The Committee finds that the Comprehensive Plan is a guide only and that the boundaries of the map elements are not specific , but can be shifted somewhat to follow the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. As Conclusion No . 5 indicates . the applicant retains the ability to request a re-classification to R-1 . An R-1 use in this area would not be as compatible with the Comprehensive Plan designations as would be R-3 . Furthermore , the development of the property for R-3 uses would be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood,_ would create a buffer as anticipated under the B-1 designation on the Comprehensive Plan and would meet the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. I I I I I Renton City Council 7/19/8• Page 2 Public Meeting - Cont. Budget Revisions Mayor Shinpoch's State of the. Budget address stated that in Cont. order, to accommodate decreased revenue receipts, meet our obligations to a growing population and provide sufficient ending fund balances in the four major tax funds to carry the City linto 1983, it is necessary to reduce expenses and to seek a tax increase. Personnel has been reduced by not filling needed positions allowed in the budget and not replacing on a one-for- one basis employees who have retired. The work force is but by 13 1/2 positions. The proposed budget cuts total $467,180. The Mayor asked Council to approve a 1/2 cent sales tax effect- ive October 1 , 1982, explaining sufficient time must 'be allowed for public input, 30-day roll-back time period, and 60 days' notice to Department of Revenue. Persons speaking: John O'Hare, 583 Pierce Ave. SE said no one likes taxes, consumer is at end of chain and that some personnel cuts should be made at the top, that the clerks could do what the supervisors do. Sandy Webb, 430 Mill Ave. S. commented on use of City Funds objecting to the refurnishing of the Mayor's Office and 6th Floor Conference Room and the agreement with Renton School District for construction of the balifieldi Council discussed Initiative 435 (to remove sales tax from food) ! cost of city services, removal of tax next year, cut in service-no growth, waiting for Cities and County to approve the 1/2 per cent sales tax, possible avenues for more revenue; withholding emplloyees' negotiated 7% cost of living and step increases; mandatory days off; B & 0 tax; and the 1/4 of one percent real estate transfer tax. Upon inquiry of Legilative action re; the event of removal of tax from food by Initiative 435, Avery Garrett reponded it would take 2/3 vote of both houses to override the Initiative. Mary Ellen Hamlin, 13205 138th Ave. SE, contended developer fees not outlawed by the Legislature. Kay Johnson, Chamber of Commerce, spoke of no growth. MOVED BY CLYMEIR, SECOND MATHEWS, CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED B1Y MATHEWS, SECOND REED COUNCIL AUTHORIZE THE ADMINISTRATION TO IMPLEMENT PROPER LEGISLATION FOR 1/2 PERCENT LOCAL OPTION SALES TAX. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND REED THE SUBJECT OF 1/4 OF ONE PERCENT REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAX BE BROUGHT BACK TO THE COUNCIL NEXT WEEK. CARRIED. AUDIE CE COMMENT Donald E. McWilliams, 2820 Lake Washington Blvd. N. requested Planning and Development Committee Report be read. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECOND STREDICKE SUSPEND RULES AND BRING THE MATTER PEAL McWilliam BEFORE COUNCIL. CARRIED. Planning and Development Committee APPEAL e 030-82 Member Hughes presented report reversing the Hearing Examiner's Decision and granting McWilliams Rezone R 030-82 located on the easlt side of Union Ave. NE between NE 4th St. and NE 6th St. extended. The Committee was in(disagreement with Finding of Fact No. 10 and No. 8 and stated the development of the property for R-3 uses would be compatible with the surrounding neighbor- hood and would create a buffer as anticipated. MOVED BY HUGHES SECOND REED COUNCIL CONCURR IN COMMITTEE-REPORT. CARRIED. Mill Ave.Sandy Webb, 430 Mill Ave. S. complained of parking on Mill Ave. Park'ng S. CONS NT AGENDA The following business matters are adopted by one motion of the Council which follows the items included; Clai for Damages Claim for Damages was filed by Robert A. Stoutenberg, 8904 S. Robt. Stoutenberg 121st Street, Seattle in the amount of $10.60 for refrigerator vent cover on motor home damaged by overhanging tree limbs, vicinity of Taylor Ave. and Stevens. Referred to CitylAttorney and Insurance Carrier. (Councilman Stredicke requested City Crews report overhanging tree limbs for removal ). RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting July 19, 1982 Municipal Building Monday, 8:00 P.M. Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF EARL CLYMER, Council President; JOHN W. REED, NANCY L. MATHEWS, COUNCIL MEMBERS THOMAS W. TRIMM. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND MATHEWS EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCIL MEMBER RANDALL ROCKHILL (ON VACATION). CARRIED. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND MATHEWS EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCIL MEMBERS RICHARD M. STREDICKE AND ROBERT J. HUGHES, WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE CONTINUING. CARRIED. STREDICKE AND HUGHES arrived 8:11 P.M. MINUTE MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND MATHEWS, COUNCIL APPROVE MINUTES OF APPROVAL JULY 12, 1982 AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. Councilwoman Mathews requested staff designate common title re; Utilities Service Connection Fee. (see Page 6). Mayor acknowledged request. CITY STAFF BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Mayor; MAXINE E. MOTOR, Acting City Clerk; IIN ATTENDANCE DAVID DEAN, Assistant City Attorney; MICHAEL PARNESS, Adminis- trative Assistant, LT. RAY CALDWELL, Police Department; DAVID CLEMENS, Policy Development Director; MICHAEL MULCAHY, Finance r; ED HAYDUK, HousingRAPJDDirector; JOHN MCFA L , Person nel Director; and Community Development Coordinator; DIANE BATES, Civil Service Secretary. PRESS GREG ANDERSON, Renton Record Chronicle Introduction Mayor Shinpoch introduced 11th District Representative Avery Garrett. PUBLIC MEETING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted, 10% Letter of published and mailed as required by law, Mayor Shinpoch convened Intent to Annex the public meeting to consider the acceptance of the letter of Jackson Annex- intent to annex property to Renton, area located East of Fred ation Nelson Middle School , North of SE 162n . St. , known as Jackson Annexation. Policy Development Direc .or Clemens pointed out area on map explaining that the area ws adjacent to property owned by Jackson within the City limits; zoned R-3, multiple family. Annexed area is to be used for recreational purposes Spokesman: for proposed adjacent multi-family houing. Mr. Jackson requested Donald Jackson annexation for sewer purposes. Council an Stredicke inquired P.O. Box 98683 if Mr. Jackson was willing to assume tie Pre-existing Bonded Seattle 98188 Indebtedness, the Comprehensive Plan, and Zoning Ordinance of the City. Mr. Jackson agreed. Counciiman Stredicke inquired re; fee. Clemens stated $200 fee paidon 10% letter, $300 fee on 75% petition. Councilan Reed inqui ed if 75% petition nec- essary as Mr. Jackson is sole petition ,r. Clemens responded that it was. Others may want to join or object. MOVED BY STREDICKE SECOND REED COUNCIL ACCEPT 10% LETTER OF INTENT TO ANNEX AND AUTHORIZE CIRCULATION OF 75% PETITION. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND REED COUNCIL SET AUGUST 16, 1982 PUBLIC HEARING RE: 75% PETITION. CARRIED IIUBLIC MEETING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted 4udget Revisions and published Mayor Shinpoch convened the public meeting as re- quested by the Committee of the Whole Committee Report of July 12, 1982, to consider Budget revisions and needed finances for the City, including 1/2% additional local option sales tax. V 1 1 Renton City C uncil 6/28/82 Pag J 3 I CONSENT AGENDA The following items are u6g.,1.)026 ,. one motion which follows the items included: Final Payen Letter from Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering Division, Signal Gary Norris Traffic Engineer, recommended acceptance of signal Improvements improvement project CAG 005-82 located at NE Sunset Blvd. at Harrington! Ave. NE, NE 10th St. and NE 12th St. File No. HES O0OS(28) . The letter requested approval of first and final payment of $31 ,080.60 and release of retained amount of 53,453.40 subject to required clearances and no liens or claims have been filed against project. Council concur. Final Payme t Letter fro Public Works Dept. , Utilities Engineering Division Talbot Hill requested ',approval of project W-599 CAG 019-81 Talbot Hill Pipeline, Pipeline ,Renton Construction Co. Also recommended release of retainage in the amount! of $31 ,564.02 after 30 days if all taxes have been ?aid and no liens or claims filed. Council concur. 1 Parking and Letter from Policy Development Director Clemens recommended referral Loading to the Planning and Development Committee the subject ofcodeOrdinancedefinitionsofparkinglotandstorageyards, as well as development regulations for inclusion in the Parking and Loading Ordinance. Council concur. Credit Unio Letter from the Executive Department requested consideration df pro- Lease Agree ent posed City of Renton Credit Union lease agreement and authorization for the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the document. Refer to Ways 1 and Means Committee. Bid Opening City Clerk Mead submitted report of 6/16/82 bid opening for One LID #325] Valley Place LID #325; seven bids received. See attached tabulation. Refer to the Public Works Department and the Transportation Committee. LID 325:, street improvements and appurtenances located south of S 43rd Sty. , east of SR 167) Damages '1Cl . im Claim for Damages was filed by Lon R. Ledvina, 12008 SE 157th P1 . , LedvinaI in the amount of $254.22 for windshield damage allegedly caused by rock thrown by street sweeper at Puget Sound Dr. S. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Carrier. Appeal by An appeal' was filed by James L. Colt, President, Mt. Olivet Cemetery Mt. Olivet Company of the Land Use Hearing Examiner's decision on Special Permit Cemetery o No. SP 012-82 for filling of site south of NE 4th St. and south- Special ' Pe mit easterlylof NE 3rd St. , in the amount of 150,000 c.y. over al five Ema Cug:ini dba to ten year period and excavation of approximately 30,000 cu.yds. T & E Inve tment Refer to' Planning and Development Committee. Appeal of Appeal was filed by Donald E. McWilliams of the Land Use Hearing McWilliams Examiner's decision of 6/20/82 regarding McWilliams Rezone R 030-82 Rezone R 0;0-82 located on the east side of Union Ave. NE between NE 4th St. and l NE 6th Si. extended. Examiner recommended denial . Refer to the Planning and Development Committee. 1 Appeal Of Appeal has been filed by Donald E. McWilliams of Hearing Examiner's McWilliams decisionlof 6/15/82 regarding the McWilliams Preliminary Plat PP- Prelimi;'nar Plat 031-82. Area located on the east side of Union Ave. NE between NE 4th St. and NE 6th St. extended. Refer to Planning and Develop- ment Committee. I I Consent Agenda MOVED BY! CLYMER, SECOND STREDICKE, ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS Approved PRESENTED. CARRIED. I CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS I Group W C-ble Letter from Group W Cable, Subsidiary of Westinghouse Broadcasting Rate Incr:ase and Cablie Inc. , James R. Robinow, General Manager, declared intent Request to raise its basic service rates, effective 10/1/82, from $8.95 to 9.95 per month plus city taxes. The letter noted basic rate has i been inleffect almost seven years without increase. MOVED By STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, DISPENSE WITH READING OF LETTER (CiOPIES l DISTRIBUTED) AND SET DATE OF 8/9/82 FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON RATE INCREASE .AS REQUESTED BY GROUP W. CARRIED. i For.Use By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # IF,3AGENDAITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./ omm. City Ul.erk' s Office For Agenda Of ' June 28, 1982 Meeting Date) Staff Contact Del Mead I Name . Agenda Status: SUBJECT: A eal of Hearin Examiner'' s Decision Consent f 6 10 8 - McWilliams R40 0-82 Public Hearing Correspondence Ordinance/Resolution Old Business 1 New Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc.)Attach Study Session A.Appe 1 Other. B. - Hear nq Examiner' s Decision Approval : C.City Clerk' s Letter 6/23/82 Legal Dept. Yes_ No N/A Refer toPlanningCOUNCILACTIONRECOMMENDED:Finance Dept. Yes No: N/A_ Other Clearance i I FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- $ Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Backgroi.nd information, prior action and effect of implementation) Attach additional pages if necessary.) Appeal filed by Donald E: McWilliams. Received 6/23/82 I 1 PARTIES OF RECORD/.INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: I j I SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. I' Cl/er/C OF R 0 z THE CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTO,N-VI A.SK 98055 94 Pt.. f t i o 1 eo SEP'c fr e JULBARBARAY. 'SHI POCH o RECEi ED MAYOR MEMORANDUM civofRE.- DATE: July 1, 1982 e67Z21," 2{ TO: Planning and Development Committee FROM: David R. Clemens, Policy Development Director RE: McWILLIAMS APPEAL The Polic Development Department has reviewed the two appeals submitted by' McWilliams of the Hearing Examiner denials of applications made by the proponent. In. review of he appeal applications, no information is provided as to the substance of the appeal. Section 4-3016(A) states as follows: The written notice of appeal shall fully, clearly and thoroughly specify 1 the ubstancial errors in fact or law whicf exists in the record of the 1 proc edings from which the appellant seeks relief." Further, S ction 4-3016(E) states in part: The consideration by the City Council shall be based solely upon the record, the Examiner's report, the notice of appeal and additional submissions by the parties." Based upon the currently. available information, neither appeal conforms to Section 4-3016(A) or 4-3016(E). Having failed to meet the minimum requirements of each of these secti ns, the Policy Development Department finds no basis for modifyingtheExaminer's ecision in either of these cases. Further, t e Policy Development Department in its testimony before the Hearing Examiner o these applications, expressed our-grave concern about the proposal. The Policy Dev lopment Department believes that the Hearing Examiner's decision is fully' consistent ith the Comprehensive Plan, its policies, and the standards set forth by, the City C uncil for review', of a rezone application which are contained in Section 4-3014(C). RECOMME DATION The Planni g and Development Committee should recommend to the City Council that the appeal of McWilliams for both the rezone and preliminary plat be denied. I V 1 OF R,, I z I 'THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 z NW. il IS BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD C.M.C. 9, 0 co' CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500 o9gTD SEP1 , 30 Jun 23, 1.982 7. APPEAL FILED BY DONALD E. McWILLIAMS RE: Appeal of Land Use Examiner' s Decision Dated June 10, 1982. Re one Request - #.. R-030-82. E To arties of Record: Pursuant to Title 4, Chapter 30, City Code, written appeal of Land Use Hearing Examiner' s decision has been filed with the City Clerk, along with the proper fee of $25.00. NOTI E IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeal and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council ' s Planning and Development Committee and will be considered by the City Council when the matter is r-ported out of committee. Plea .e contact the Council Secretary 235-2586, for date and time of the ommittee and council meetings , should you desire to attend. Your- very truly, CITY OF RENTON 4 / / Cr 4. 'a Delores A. Mead, C.M.C. City Clerk DAM/s I OF RA, THE CITY OF REN.TON i MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD C.M.C. 090 CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500 014T D SEP °. 1‘ Q` Jun- 23, 1982 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STA E OF WASHINGTON) ss. COU TY OF KING DELORES A. MEAD, City Clerk of the City of Renton, being first dul sworn on oath, deposes and says that she is a citizen of the United Sta es and a resident of the State of Washington, over the age of 21 and not a party to nor interested in this matter. That on the 23rd day of June, 1982, at the hour of 5:00 p.m. , you affiant duly mailed and placed in the United States Post Office at Ren on, King County, Washington, by first class mail , to all parties of , record, a true and correct NOTICE OF APPEAL OF THE HEARING EXAMINER' S DECISION FILED BY DONALD E. McWILLIAMS. fR-030-82. Del res A. Mead, City lerk SUBS RIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE me this 23rd day of June, 1982 Nota y Public in and for the State of Washington, residing in King Coun y ss v CITY OF RENTON o FINANCE DEPARTMENT N• 23241 RENTO1, WASHIN TON 98055 6- 19' b_ t_a—_ RECEIVED OF e p _ f) - TOTAL ad GWEN E. MARSH L, F NAN,CE DIRECTOR BY^ CITY OF RENTON No 23242 FINANCE DEPARTMENT RENTON, WASHINGTKI 98055 9 ( '- RECEIVED OF L 3 1 t/1///: y 3J- 6- ;1- TOTAL c,VS---C/ v GWEN E. MARS L, IN CE DIRECTOR BY i, l June 23, 1982 City Clerk: I wi •h to file an appeal to the City of Renton on Plat Request PP-131-82 and File 0-030-82. We wish to construct 9 duplex units, it w.uld greatly improve existing property and blend into existing mult'ple building to the South. IA-Lb( ee,7-iutd.e.V-4.4- Donald E. McWilliams cry LL`'9- rri 20 t t cb, gyp, 43:4‘ C'5) co r y Oct . c• s i filarfilar9 Ran real estate 645 Shattuck ave.so.,renton,wa.98055, 271-5311 R8 CEIVED une 20 1980 CITY OF RENTONHEARINGEXAMINER red Kaufman AM II2 enton Hearing Examiner 7i819411 2 ;• PM tc, 00 Mill Avenue South 41 enton, Washington 98055 tear Mr. Kaufman, I read in the newspaper of your denial of the McWilliams rezone ' pplication because of the location in an establshed single family ieighborhood. I !have worked often with the properties in that forty acre section and 'know the owners and their plans for their property and believe your assessment of that as an established single family eighborhood areiwrong. I am included a small map of the area with ome information ,about ownership and those owners plans for their roperties. he property I have highlighted in yellow is owned or optioned by ifferent- corporations which have one principal in common. If ou are interested you can call me and I will give you his name f you want to verify or talk with him personally about his plans or his property: It is common knowledge Safeway has choosen part f this site for a new store. There are four homes on that twenty ome acres and all are rentals and all are scheduled for removal rom thesite. he property Ihave highlighted in purple belongs to Clarence Williams nd he has four single family houses on the southerly half and he ives in one of them. He has long considered these dwellings as emporary and is negotiating now for a sale to a multiple family eveloper. he orange property is owned by a investor, Malotta, and is vacant nd purchased recently with intent to use the manufacturing park omprehensive plan designation. The blue parcel is owned by an investor, Balko, and is being held to use the comprehensive plan usiness and office park designations, this has a small substandard ingle family rental on the site. The dark blue portion is vacant nd being held by an investor to also utilize the office park desig- ation. azel Rucker lives on the brown outlined site and has two rentals in ddition. Irene,Grayson and her son' live on the other brown outlined ite i I i On he entire shy forty acre site there are seventeen buildings which are one eleven plex condominium one gas station one water district facility 14 single family homes which comprise the following ownership figuration: Clarence Williams lives in one and has three rental houses 4 Hazel Rucker lives in one and has two rental houses 3 1 Irene Grayson lives in one and her son lives in one.2 Hank Balko has one rental house 1 The common principal corporations have four rental houses 4 14. Th.t totals four owner occupants in the forty acre parcel half of which I 'im confident would not agree with your assessment as an established si gle family area., In fact it is clearly not an established single family area to me. I as involved in the sale of seven of these parcels and I know the ownership of these parcels intimately and these owners plans for th it properties. Clarence Williams is retiring in the fall and al eady looking for a buyer. Irene Grayson is ninety four years old an is considering selling in the near future. The only real owner oc upant is Hazel Ruckerwho belives the development around her will pr vide her with the convenience of a retirement home and the comfort of her income property and her long time family home. T k you a y an i 1 11 44. 1.1t s••,... i t,' t r s ') , '• L e„...... 414/. . 4`t4.1 i. I'Tif71. r,,,it-t$•,. ,..V. ', '1,- , ' 4, 4.#' .:•.; -i':' ,A,',1. I., 1 ,11 NO, teNg Et .' - ' w 1,-1 l' , , A, ''k fri, S. .4 . ,,,'.,1. e' ' '"•l• ' . f›Z' ,,'' V', 'It ' P. Viiisit • vv.'U.. tr" 1. ''''.,'41 4 '.' r'''' VW-; ' i. V WO.•,,qr 1' •, f,,,. . ,,,, 1 ., 4 4 .•-•,• 4. ` :.*. • " •• tt I 1 r,,, i, , 4, 40.•ft*.,,f: 4 41)11`7 i.i. .t. ... r ..,7i hi e i 3,I,, t- % 4 *. :.• . I , 4 ' , • ., K., .. .5, 51- •, • 1 A,:. 1,- i'D :4- , k • -4. •4' J. .4 ...O., .,.. ',..„. 4 E. 1 r ' IC' 1! ' ii .- C: ,..' I t j i • U IV ' 4-• .14 41-- K r--1 L. i • Fjt• '4 l % ' 4;' 4' t.G..,5"''..r. in .trIN. .,..* •-• •••'1" i'r „. , 1..4.:;,,.;,,:, :,•_itri,••-..r4.-••:-A.5;„,•,,:tr..,-..fge_s a r.--5 ..- , 14 yl. "' L,-.„--7.• :.!.......... m......,...--• ......,..... . e 73. t•• ,.', . j....-- 1.-4-•"'"" •,,,• 1 4 5 4-"'' .,'-'-' , " 3 ..11..C,I 't A '..,,,,,,,,r' " • r ALLiaigiiii7.&-:-----: - • -.-1•-•,, ., ni I.; t r 1 4' eN 61 r, V t 1)., ' li. Il..i,.; 5 r thlk404- 4h4 ',1- - a, ,. .. it I s'."• Ji ti 1- t lik, ...,.av, ., 4 I 7'w • fr 4.4 N,i,1 14,4 CL93 k 741; v Y-- 0,4 013. ' i'i• •f 1 Car tee' 1 A • 4 41, ir 46tIV . - '''• -r N‘..•..„.. . I, E'.•, '4.....1.t.ve.l.!._..! .4 , _.,., •:' I) f " i; a, 1,, . r: a( :,........- 0 r I0 s i*.,•,.,. i,..-0 1.. .. 1 i 1.0..„; 1 1 MI * 6, •'44t-'74A.A../A.1.100V1 'A* ' ••• 39 4 e i 4 ,r. 41. ..."-'1—.. .•' 4-4.', 1 7 1 ‘ 11, 1 7, „'• 'I;t'• 1 1 I , t- • . '• ke' i•::'":-. 1._ s..-• -. 0": ,0,,,,:''' .. . a, '' , i. 11 Iii.....•,' 4 ,*;, k-41' 410 1 1 i I .) 1011 7„,4,- , ,,. Cil f6r,-4,4-k , • 4' rii,. 4 it.S1 r tors Pi 460) , •i .1 , ';--, 1.1 1, ,, vf , i,k tr • 4; 1.., • i ' It'1 ilie' I.1.... - i .. ipi„.. I, i 4 V 1 41•.• • 11 11111 .•4...$:. 'I, ' i si ... ,r3t. , 1.4 ri.e.'46.4? kg. 6 .a t V.* 41 4tr ; 4.. • - --,,. ivk427- •4.r;-' 1,4.t•,. . .37" ... 1 V„ uit'''', 1. '-'4--`:: ':-447407,3c:4=--_ -:4-.16 Of '.• • •4.11 7 , , - . 4., v.‘" •',. ,,.. f 111., ...P 4 F. ,,„ 40.... 1 , g, a.,,,,, iv-,am--;,.;4 4--ey, .,,,,-7 -V ? - :--z.-\- • 4et4i,e,- - 4, NA ; t. 4 .- i ) i •,.' t„i-.74 % 1 k,... i I r If_. O'itr t , ' 1.4A o,..IL.L MA 'i-, .,", .... h4P.t,t4 ‘ Ni...,.,1..i. ,5 '•i ..H.$1*4 4if. 'ail • ,, i. t c% 4, 7-t-- y vRt •; I.; I(rt'', _ ibt ...- -." •9', .;• 1 our . ril,.. .... t ..et x 4,vo T. i.."'''' '''• ,wiCt.i•-,• Z,4t 5'., • 1 . k.Ai. , :, -. 1O.% 4; 's.i s 1• , .. ‘ a•",.; Ao. -o- • s..t ,,, .., .-. , ,,...q''' 4'. ' ' ' Ally 4 ' . 1 ' ''''‘, -^. ltv• . v". 1..f,^. ' ; •.7^ 4r 1".*4•;11 ti-:, it, :oft k 4-.‘-'• 2' - '".71.1....1:119.ii'T''1..,,,• , e '• ."''A. , ' -' c J 1. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King Marilyn J . Petersen being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 10thday of June 19 82, affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Subscr i bed and sworn thi s \ day of v‘/) 19 {52_ • UtiuS_ LIA • &_64-e Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at e./V1ov) Application, Petition or Case: Donald E. McWilliams; R-030-82 The minutes contain a list 06 the parr i.e2s o6 necond. ) June 10, 1982 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICANT: Donald E. McWilliams FILE NO. R-030-82 LOCATION: East side of Union Avenue N. E. between N.E. 4th Street and N. E. 6th Street (extended) . SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks a rezone of the subject site from G to R-3 for future development of a proposed nine-lot preliminary plat with 18 duplex units . SUMMARY OF Building & Zoning Department: Rezone to B-1 with restrictive RECOMMENDATION: covenants prohibiting residential development. Hearing Examiner: Denial . BUILDING & ZONING TheemBuilding M& Zon21 ,ing198Department report was received by the DEPARTMENT REPORT: 2. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building & Zoning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows : The hearing was opened on June 1 , 1982 at 9:55 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator, presented the Building & Zoning Department report , and entered the following exhibits into the record: Exhibit #1 : Application File containing Building & Zoning Department report and other pertinent documents Exhibit #2: King County Assessor's Map Responding to the Examiner's inquiry regarding prior action on the proposal in 1981 , Mr. Blaylock advised that the Environmental Review Committee had made a declarationofenvironmentalsignificanceduetoinsufficientwaterandsewerservicetothesubject site; however, that matter has since been resolved by the Public Works Department. The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: Jerry Buck Triad Associates 11415 N.E. 128th Street Kirkland , WA 98033 Mr. Buck advised his opinion that the conflicts between the Building & Zoning Department recommendation for B-1 and the applicant' s request for R-3 zoning aread as a recommendedsultof interpretation of the Comprehensive Plan. He noted that approval by all departments with the exception of Policy Development, which the in recommendation for denial upon interpretation of the plan. p ande 1981 as well as currently, the proposal complied with the plan in everyrespect , inapheeat felt it important to note that the Comprehensive Plan differs from the Rzoningcmap ne boundary lines are intended to be general and not property specific. Northeast Quadrant Comprehensive Plan adopted in December, 1981 , Mr. Buck indicated that in recognizing the purpose and function of the plan, three quadrants were designated for commercial use, the northeast , northwest and southeast quadrants of Union Avenue N.E. and N.E. 4th Street , and in verbal policy, it is recognized that the northeast quadrant of Duvall Avenue N.E. and N.E. 4th Street are also designated as commercial use. During the writing of the plan, the city perceived the need for only one suitable commercial center and has referenced in the report that the location of such a center hatrthee rt fails northeast quadrant of Union and 4th is currently under review. However, to mention that a second commercial proposal for the northeast quadrant foDufvailco and c4t is also under review, and therefore uncertainty exists reh ardin app merial center at Union Avenue N.E. r amily Mr. Buck described the uses surrounding iefthe thatsubjectdevelopment of either the subjectositelforfoffice uses or vacant property, noting his be park use would not provide an appropriate buffer to single family uses. He indicated that generally, office park use should be buffered by multifamily from single family uses , and R-03u-82 Page Two objected that the caveat of restrictive covenants swithuaelezoneetouB-1etootprecludeshape Jdevelopment of residential uses would render the are unsuitable for office park dthelOeZc e,a poli eei n' s benapproved current asesubmitted that anuse in the area. He requested that R-3 designation to allow the proposal to proceed as planned. The Examiner requested testimony in support of the application. Responding was: Don McWilliams 2820 Lake Washington Boulevard N. Renton, WA 98055 Mr. McWillliams , owner of the property for 14 years , indicated his desire to construct asal duplex units and provide a buffer zone for the existing single family residences , a prop supported by staff at the time of Phase. The nd plattedxaslnerrequestedredMff g8aylock stated units could bthat located on the subject site if rezoned R-3 zoning would allow a maximum of 30 unitstlsonal site. o thTheereExaminerltheniinquired if an R-2 category had been considered, which would McWilii ms advised that at one time, the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site as appropriate for R-2 zoning. The Examiner requested further testimony in support. Responding was : Stan Wolf 1177 Harrington Avenue N.E. , #305 Renton, WA 98056 Mr. Wolf , resident of Renton for 25 years , advised that he has owned four duplexes , a and is fourplex and an apartment building above indacatedlthat the anladdit onalecondominium familir with the surrounding environment. was constructed last comple C owned by him, located to the south of the subject site, year, liand the site was chosen due tot e proximity elopment. toHecobjected and toadevelopmenrks which troflans an ideal building site for residential po office park on the site which would create more rlraffior. ceandvoifferttheat posshas noibilityobjection for location of a commercial use such as pizza to the proposal , and the same builderhh e has to ct no eonomc been ie ntere tsinuthe' subject constructed project. his condominium development although of ubject site. Mr. The Examiner inquired regarding developmentexistimmediately lot,ta 12-unitscondominium complex Blayl¢ck advised that single family homes on another, and vacant property exists which is zoned B-1 . The Examiner inquired if the property is undeveloped to the north. Mr. Blaylock stated that four dwelling units exist to the north. I Resp nding in support of the application was: GeorgeSpendiff 807 Union Avenue N.E. Renton , WA 98056 Mr. pendiff clarified that four houses are llocatedHonestnd eesmall tha parceln toh the hsouth, and the property to th e north is similarly developed. been developed in semi-multiple uses surrounding the subject site. The 'lExaminer requested testimony in opposition to the proposal . Responding was: Dave Clemens I Policy Development Director Mr. IClemens reviewed two additional policies of the Comprehensive Plan which are not specifically stated in the Northeast QuadrantnotedathatReunfortuewing nately, the rzoningaindthelaPeant should occur in an incremental fashion , in question did not follow such policy adopted ondlyhesince development early is notsgoan9 the area is resulting in a mish-mash of uses. to existing adjoining uses , occur in an incremental fashion, consideration sho.ild be given which are stable, single family homes. Finally, as itelstolthesComprehensive Plan designations for the Northeast Quadrant area, the Comprehensive utilized as a zoning map with distinforvthatlines;enehalearea to be nonr, it is yresidential regardless at the intent of the Comprehensive Plan is 9 of what that commercial use activity might be.Zo i. Clemenstmfefelttitthatre bassedlonathoconsister three issues , the direction of theBuildingdwiththeconcernthatthedevelopmentshouldoccurincrementallyandnadjoininthatgiugg seshshlul d be, protected. If any zoning category is determined appropriate, be sensitive to adjoining uses which currently exist; however, substantial evidence R-030-82 Page Three presented both by the city and the proponent indicates that a rezone of the property may be inappropriate altogether. The Examiner stated that as referenced in his letter to the Builaing & Zoning Department, dated May 24, 1982, the public hearing was legally published for a rezone to R-3, and discussion of a rezone to business/commercial , B-1 , category would not be appropriate at the hearing since residents in surrounding areas would not be apprised of the fact that commercial uses are contemplated. He also suggested that the recommendation of the Building & Zoning Department may have included denial . Since there was no further discussion, the hearing regarding File No. R-030-82 was closed by the Examiner at 10:25 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1 . The applicant , Donald E. McWilliams , filed a request for a reclassification of approximately 1 . 88 acres of property from G-1 (General ; Single Family Residential ; Minimum lot size - 35,000 square feet) to R-3 (Medium Density Multifamily Residential ) . 2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Building and Zoning Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #1 . 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton 's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , RCW 43.21C, as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) , responsible official . 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. The subject property is located on the east side of Union Avenue N.E. between N.E. 4th Street and N. E. 6th Street (extended) . 6. The subject site is generally level . The site is covered with scrub brush , alder and Douglas fir trees. The subject site is vacant. 7. The subject site was annexed into the city in November of 1966 by Ordinance No. 2290. The current G-1 classification was applied at that time. 8. The land use element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of commercial and office park type uses. At this time, the zoning code has not been amended to provide for an office park district. 9. The legal notice for the hearing indicated that the subject of the hearing would be a request to reclassify the subject site to R-3. The Building & Zoning Department has recommended that the subject site be reclassified to B- 1 (Business/Commercial ) . The legal notice indicating a request for R-3 zoning is not sufficient to apprise the public of a possibility that business or commercial zoning might be considered at the public hearing. While parties might not object to medium density multifamily uses being permitted on the subject site which would be permitted under the requested R-3, they might have reacted differently if they had been informed that the more intensive uses permitted under B- 1 zoning might be considered, such as high density multifamily uses , laundries, cleaning and pressing establishments , service stations , restaurants, etc. In addition, the SEPA review was predicated on the R-3 request and did not address the potential of 9-1 zoning. 10. Immediately north of the subject site are four older single family homes. Immediately south of the subject site are an additional three older single family homes. These seven homes are stable and likely to remain for the foreseeable future according to both the applicant and the Policy Development Director. A single family subdivision is located west of the subject site across Union Avenue N.E. There are also vacant properties in the vicinity of the subject site. South of the three single family homes south of the subject site is a twelve-plex constructed on R-3 property. 11 . The zoning districts in the area are generally single family residential to the west, north and east of the subject site. A mix of R-1 (Single Family Residential ; Minimum lot size - 7,200 square feet) and G-1 districts are located adjacent to the subject site. The property along all points of the compass immediately abutting or across R-030-b2 Page Four the street from the subject site is zoned G-1 . South of the twelve-plex's R-3 zone is a B-1 zone straddling the intersection of Union Avenue N.E. and N.E. 4th Street, 12. A reclassification to R-3 would permit approximately 55 units on the just under two acre parcel . Fifty-five units would increase the traffic by about 330 trips per day, increase the school age population by about 14 students , and increase the general population by approximately 115 people. (These figures are derived from general estimates of multifamily units. ) The applicant has proposed developing 18 units in nine duplex structures on the subject site. This would increase the population by about 45, increase the school age population by about four students and increase traffic by an additional 142 trips per day. The subject site would also accommodate seven single family lots under R-1 (Single Family Residential ; Minimum lot size - 7,200 square feet) zoning. The population would he increased by about 25, the school age population would increase by about four Students , and traffic would increase by about 70 trips per day. (These figures are derived from general estimates of single family zones . ) 13. The Northeast Comprehensive Plan indicates that a major shopping center could be located generally in the area of Union and N.E. 4th intersection (with the exception of the southwest corner) or in the area of the northeast corner of the intersection of Duvall and N. E. 4th. The plan indicates generally by its tenor that anticipated demand would favor only one of these locations with exclusion of the other areas after further review. The Plan also indicates that multifamily housing should be encouraged as a buffer between commercial and less intensive uses , and that not every parcel is appropriate for development in the 1990 time frame. CONCLUSIONS: 1 . The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest and will not impair the public health, safety and welfare. In addition, the rezone must comply with at least one of the three criteria listed in Section 4-3014 which provides in part that: a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area rezone or land use analysis ; or b. The subject site is potentially designated for the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan; or c. There has been material and substantial change in the circumstances intheareainwhichthesubjectsiteislocatedsincethelastrezoningofthe property or area. The applicant has failed to demonstrate that the requested reclassification is in the public interest, that the site is potentially designated for the classification sought , or that there have been material and substantial changes in the area. Given the existing development in the area, predominantly single family, and the relatively narrow configuration of the site, a single family subdivision may be more appropriate. 2. While the map element of the Comprehensive Plan cannot be reviewed in isolation, it presumably specifies the most appropriate use for land, if that use is also compatible with nearby or immediately adjacent uses . The designation of the subject site for office park uses by the map element ignores the uses immediately surrounding the subject site. That is , the subject site is only a 132 foot wide finger of property surrounded on the north and the south by both single family zoning and development. There are seven single family homes north and south of the site which have been described as stable by city staff. Single family uses and development are located across the street to the west. 3. The request represents spot zoning that would benefit the property owner tothedetrimentofthegeneralpublicandinviolationofboththemapelementofthe Comprehensive Plan and the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Policies elements 3.B.3 and 4.C.4 indicate that boundaries of districts should be buffered by uses compatible with each district, and that single family dwellings should be buffered from more intense uses. The twelve-plex south of the subject site already serves this general purpose by buffering the existing single family usesimmediatelyadjacenttothesubjectsitefromtheB-1 zoning located near the intersection of 4th and Union. R-030-82 Page Five Policies elements 3. 6.4 and 5 indicate that new uses should be designed to be compatible with existing uses and be of a harmonious intensity with existing uses. Finally, the implementing policy #2 of the Land Use Objective of the Northeast Comprehensive Plan indicates that not all property is appropriate for development by the 1990 time frame but that the map and plan would represent full development for some time beyond 1990. The establishment of a multifamily zone in the midst of the stable and established single family homes would thwart the various policies and goals of theComprehensivePlanandimposeanintrusiveandinappropriateuseonanexistingsinglefamilyarea. 4. The applicant retains the potential to develop single family uses on the subject site in the form of an approximately seven-lot single family subdivision, and is therefore not denied reasonable use of the subject site. The applicant had the burden of demonstrating that the proposal met the requirements of the zoning code and was consistent and compatible with the Comprehensive Plan. As the U.S. Supreme Court recognized in Board of Regents v Roth, 408 U.S. 564 (1972) , a property right involves more than a unilateral expectation of a benefit. A reclassification of the subject site to R-1 would be the most appropriate use of the subject site and would be more compatible with the existing uses and character of the area. The City Council should deny the requested R-3 zoning. 5. The applicant retains the ability to request a reclassification to R- l . RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should deny the reclassification of the subject site to R-3. ORDERED THIS 10th day of June, 1982. Fred J. Kau an Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 10th day of June, 1982 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Jerry Buck, Triad Associates , 11415 N.E. 128th Street , Kirkland , WA 98033 Don McWilliams , 2820 Lake Washington Boulevard N. , Renton, WA 98055 Stan Wolf, 1177 Harrington Avenue N.E. , #305, Renton , WA 98056 George Spendiff, 807 Union Avenue N.E. , Renton, WA 98056 TRANSMITTED THIS 10th day of June, 1982 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director David Clemens , Policy Development Director Members , Renton Planning Commission Ron Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Lawrence J. Warren , City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before June 24, 1982. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact , error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen 14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may , after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall . 1.; • ; •. 11-' 6', FA', r14Y` T TI To„.,.....• ••, ,,,,. G . 1 L. es,I, - 3.7f, SR-1 I F• , w. y. 1 :"-Lrit•-•:: R-1 G 1 Q1_,111:-.-...111- -....- 4;'.,*- 1doi'll,*. GS-1 c.....,:,.. . --. 1, 1:..;_.„ ..1. ....• i i i , , R—I 1 • f T, II r . __— G-7200 i -T1~-~It)l,r1•I•,Pr1 Ll-1 i ' 7/ W (1, R—I 1 , . eJ 4%.* SC1 it 1 i 1 4.'4,ix ,, t .•,a. '. 1 '4 ,..."---.-.. , • ...... 5 . t t : 1 r , 1 a•2 i• GS _I • -j R_3 i , , jji j ' f' L-B—1 ; I4T 4t- in' 41- T 1 1 1F-7---- —1 r 1 i r___— 14.1.6 RZENWOOD dC,EEiMETERY Er 4 jiL— Ti i: IL 1 0 f I. t R-030-82 7 i APPLICANT D O N R L D E . M c I•!I L L I AM S TOTAL AREA + 1 . 88 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS UNION AVENUE N . E . EXISTING ZONING G-1 , GENERAL USE EXISTING USE VACANT PROPOSED USE MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (9 lots for duplexes ) COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN OFFICE PARK AND COMMERCIAL COMMENTS 4 i..-- , il`-ia r i- ., ISt'-3," i ` 4 112 V, E`J'; 15448 ®1 I---- - 7l1 - Ti_.1.. r' 4..//1 -,. ; 1.'131 2' y _-3t52z 1` *1 2 0 r -_/ 3. —1_ . 5" In er 057At3Gis r ' 32 ® S i s 1.34 r c10 a tj c 3• t I '''a, I in 1.0 on 7--- C---4-1' * : 22T-" ' 0 z or l Smith 0.61 a W Q ti U Er .. • -- i w 3 Z.fi1 AC 6} p Ii x; ;6 - ,:8 . .9 IIYY,UJJI 50.32 Ac. 56 041 cs 0 • . n ROAD esmr AC 30 -Delp c54-r { 1p l• 1 RENTON 6 COR • ' LIMIT 1 MI 2' - I C WiIIioms 2.31 C. Lloyd V & uazcl G. J Weber IT I 02 A C r N YY V.t A +f ri :.t. u O Z sso gos 1.8 r C. _ o• ti C. WiIIlomS r P'.':ARD t WAR1. F- a--- - ly:D r i WI 4 Mc1 i TO ' c i 02 Ac •, : I, •1 1, - -- .- - , I' 309.44 I.W. Corue N I Charles Rucker E c_r.: J Da d Jcnen I. 7C sc f 2.265 i -: o. I- 1.59 Ac t.22 Ac. I I 89 Ac IV 3fl50 4 8 I I 04 Ac grow 4 ' r/ ,ro r 3, r fp i ( : I cricio` 03 Skc'" • I 1, c . .4 I ra 175 * is- Ili Sgt 1.67Ac Joy Dovia Jensen I 0.86Ac ma EFIRV C Y WU c't0 4.9 AC 250 1 a= I 0 • I Its 1s O 14 2 I1• n ' c II o I N c use z `/1 ajeA ' O U ei 1 1418 D.QI AC. r i z Z k, J e E Ac`i!) II r1 Q (' I W. 0;11 Ara,ti, owe s• ' ii, I CMV 45 It so Pe c eR es II) 1 E ,, A fi r.•,o, I Snr, ( u I O I r1 434c I Sr I p I N) C 0 T N7 n, L. II14 n e. 1 60 I - -o. JI 0 2 1- it Z I t 1l 1 • 1 CRET3DMjh1LhINS I` i . I oa RENTON r 6'.'.26 r1 4253 831 324 t 1.'F ) 1323I 37.4.02 1.:1 a 4ant 0 V. wit MC WILLIAMS REZONE R-030-82 in VACANT 2.“ SF 0RDEDoG,i ,' SF = SINGLE FAMILY a i t1F = MULTIPLE FAMILY I N" COM = COMMERCIAL I I II = r' El . b1''L`19-I I Nort OF I THE CITY OF RENTON z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9. 0 FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 0, 9. EDSEP4'';?) May 24, 1982 TO: Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator FROM: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner RE: File No. R-030-82; Donald W. McWilliams ; Request for Rezone. This office has received the report and recommendation of the Building and Zoning Department in the above entitled matter and must conclude that the legal notice of a reclassification of the subject site to R-3 Medium Density Multifamily) is not legally sufficient to permit the consideration of the higher classification of B-1 (Business/Commercial ) as suggested in the report. Unless this office receives information to the contrary, the hearing for the applicant 's request of R-3 zoning will be held as scheduled. If this office can be of assistance in this matter, please feel free to call . Sincerely, Kat"- Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner cc: City Attorney 4 GILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING JUNE 1 , 1982 APPLICANT: McWILLIAMS, DONALD E. FILE NUMBER: R-030-82 A. Sig fi PURPOSE OF 41+40 ]ETS'T: The applicant seeks a rezone of the subject site from G" to R-3 for future development of a proposed 9-lot preliminary plat (accompanying application) with 18 units (duplexes) . B. GENERAL I PORMATIO f: 1 . Owner of Record: McWILLIAMS, DONALD E. 2 . Applicant: McWILLIAMS, DONALD E. 3. Location : Vicinity Map Attached) East side of Union Avenue N.E. between N.E. 4th Street and N.E. 6th Street (extended) . 4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Building & Zoning Department. 5. Size of Property: 1 . 88 acres. 6 . Access :Via Union Avenue N.E. 7. Existing Zoning: G-1 , General Classification District; minimum lot size 35,000 square feet. 8. Existing Zoning in the Area: G-1 , B-1 , Business Use; R-3, Medium Density Multiple Family, minimum lot size 5,000 square feet. 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Commercial, Office Park. 10. Notification: The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Daily Record Chronicle on May 21 , 1982, and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance on May 21 , 1982. PPFT.LMXIASX gal,VORT 'TO THE REARING EXAMINER McWILLIAMS, DONALD E. JUNE 1 , 1982 PAGE TWO C. :ISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance 2290 of November 23, 1966 , at which time the present zoning classification was appliced. D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography: The subject site is essentially level. 2. Soils : Alderwood gravelly sandy loam 6-15% slopes AgC) . Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil and very slow in the substratum. Runoff is slow to medium and the erosion hazard is moderate. This soil is used for timber, pasture, berries , row crops, and for urban development. 3 . Vegetation : The property consists primarily of scrub brush with some alder and a few Douglas fir interspersed. 4 . Wildlife : The existing vegetation provides some habitat for birds and small mammals. 5 . Water : No surface water was observed on the subject site (April 16 , 1982) . 6. Land Use : The subject site is undeveloped at this time as are the parcels to the east and south. Single family subdivisions are located to the north and the west. 6. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: The surrounding properties are largely single family residential or undeveloped. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1 . Water and Sewer : A 12-inch water main and an 8-inch sanitary sewer extends north-south on Union Avenue N.E. adjacent to the subject site. 2. Fire Protection: Provided bythe City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit : METRO Transit Route #107 operates along Union Avenue N.E. adjacent to the subject site. 4 . Schools : The Honeydew Elementary School is located approximately 1/2 mile to the north of the subject site while McKnight Middle School is slightly over 2 miles to the northwest and Hazen High School is within 3/4 of a mile to the northeast. 5. Recreation : Kiwanis Park is within 1/4 of a mile to the north of the subject site. Q . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1 . Section 4-729 , G-1 ; General Classification District. 2 . Section 4-709A, R-3 ; Residence Multiple Family. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER McWILLIAMS, DONALD E. JUNE 1 , 1982 PAGE THREE H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1 . Policies Element, Comprehensive Plan, Section 4. 6, Housing Density Objective and related policies. 2 . Subdivision Ordinance, Section 9-1106-2 , Preliminary Plats. I. IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT: 1 . Natural Systems : Rezoning the subject site will not directly affect the property. Future development will remove the vegetation, disturb the soils, increase storm water runoff and have an effect on traffic and noise levels in the area. Through proper development controls and procedures, however, these impacts can be mitigated. 2. Population/Employment: Construction of 9 duplex units would increase the area population by approximately 45 persons. 3. Schools : The 9 duplexes would add 4 students to the schools in the vicinity. 4. Social : Increased opportunities for social interaction would be available for the residents of the new units. 5. Traffic : Nine duplex units would result in an additional 142 average daily trips on Union Avenue N.E. J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, RCW 43-21C, a proposed declaration of non-significance was issued by the ERC on April 19, 1982, subject to further review by the Parks and Recreation Department. K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 . City of Renton Building & Zoning Department. 2. City of Renton Design Engineering Division. 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division. 4. City of Renton Utilities Division. 5. City of Renton Fire Prevention Bureau. 6. City of Renton Parks & Recreation Department. 7. City of Renton Policy Development Department. L. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1 . The proposed rezone is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan land use designations of Office Park and Commercial. 2 . Research into City records does not indicate any recent rezones in the vicinity. Properties to the south and east were rezoned to R-3 by Ordinance 2302 (1967) , Ordinance 2390 (1968)_ , and Ordinance 2482 (1969) . PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER McWILLIAMS, DONALD E. JUNE 1 , 1982 PAGE FOUR 3 . A 12 unit condominium complex has been constructed on a parcel just south of the subject site. This is the only similar development constructed recently in the vicinity. The parcel on which the new condominium site was vacant for 14 years , thus suggesting that it was a premature rezone. 4 . This application for a rezone to R-3 was originally submitted in May of 1981 , at which time the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site as borderline Medium Density Multiple Family and Commercial. The Environmental Review Committee required the preparation of an EIS. The application was withdrawn and a new application was submitted in March 1982. A declaration of non-significance was issued. In December 1981 , a new Comprehensive Plan for the Northeast Quadrant was adopted by the City Council. This area was specifically reconsidered and designated Office Park and Commercial. 5 . The City is processing a request for a rezone to construct a major shopping center on the northeast corner on N.E. 4th Street and Union Avenue N.E. This request along with past land use actions in this immediate area suggests that the present request for rezoning to an R-3 , Multiple Family classification is inappropriate. In fact the request is untimely because it requests a functional downzoning from its potential designated by the Comprehensive Plan. The intent of the Planning Commission and City Council is very clear. The area is to become a major focal point for office and commercial development in the Highlands . However, rezoning the subject property to B-1 , Business Use does not specifically comply with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. The B-1 Zone would allow construction of multiple family residences to an R-4 density; therefore, to comply the property should be rezoned bo B-1 , Business Use with restrictive covenants prohibiting residential development. 6. Approval of the rezone request will establish a trend to develop that area south of N.E. 6th Street and north of the proposed shopping center into multiple family residentials. The recent construction of the condominium units south of the proposed site introduces a new variable which is not totally unacceptable to good planning practices. Normally, established single family areas should be buffered from high density commercial areas . In this particular case, the creation of a multiple family zone in the area between the shopping center and the single family located north of N.E. 6th Street would be acceptable and provide the intended buffer. M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Based upon the above analysis , it is recommended that the Hearing Examiner recommend to the City Council that the request , file R-030-82 , be expanded and rezoned to B-1 , Business Use with restrictive covenants prohibiting residential development . A .. 11-,, FA.', -.-W :I I I 4,1 7,1‘--7il','*4 Y' ' t Ai'lli ! *-:. 1'; '•1‘-\'- 1-. 4• 2:1-'-- 11._,. -:.A.. . . ....... _\. . „, 11..1 -- • i t ' y-1.iLIJ rr_!I. jo,F.'' ---1.o• t 411 tl.if ;•• ' 1 G 3, 9:.P- • 1s •;7 I.' Apr-:-` i•' , . . • 1 s `e.1•^I ij II i:),....,.1.:-..Q;,_,,c,A':;,,•: : G t • r.ia::::. - -...,.,,....... • . R-1 GS-1 i., ay-J.:, L-.._:„:17_,,,.‘,_. ,.. .:.,:... .... 1 ,..f)6. ... ,,.,,,:, . ... 1 • ,. ,. 11_,1._s. 1t • .. , ' , 1I r : --- 11 G-7200 t, lar'....i'f • _ ii'a .• a .4 17:-.-...•-.-.: 1.s..•,..,'..- 1; ,. 1.-i - w 6(114( C.riv:rd., s,r,i II:\....•.;41,..:,:. +:• 1 e--.:: • ) Z. :...•.•. :.-.1 I'P i if o 4,...4.....,. . .,--.-......0: •• - 1 :$ :r•-••'!". Cit-ftt4)::N I• 5 1 r .,, T,,,..i.i.,.., s ,..:,,, L. ..-. , .3 ' 4,. p' M •• Ilj1TT'1{ 77 1 V• "' a7r SR-i ''` ` R _1 bt j 1 r- R-3 4 1 • l L- 4._ FF. 1B—I r• oz r_ T r1 1FT- - - iI— yap' 1 1 likE.METMEW E ri, JAct : o i f:: 0 1. 1:±..., . 4 ail • it I 1 I F..c. r 1 II L R-030-82 APPLICANT DONALD E . McWILLIAMS TOTAL AREA + 1 . 88 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS UNION AVENUE N . E . EXISTING ZONING G-1 , GENERAL USE EXISTING USE VACANT PROPOSED USE MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ( 9 lots for duplexes ) COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN OFFICE PARK AND COMMERCIAL COMMENTS 411 LPL, -;,r':.•,^ ``` a:,% ., w r,., 1 9 CO; 154.48 (AI 7( trz61:91- 44 41 ( 3A611ZI -''3 P"1 • - 265.3 325 22 L _3M II s" 32 ® 1diF 0 0 67Ac. I3o CD .ui h 610 , 1 4 a - IJ 6 DiS 7.1 31 School O ; jja 30 B, or I Smith hlw M o a, E. - a 1 '- I 2.67 Ac. 0.61 Ac. W 'a ti s . • 29 r-, a ee =, 4'0.32 Ac. 4t F- a 21M ao 0 56 • 0.41 s a, r I 1 v c,L 3 ROAD ESMT _a(30 _ ROaO E s4.. 1.'1 RENTON COR • •••• L I MIT''''--S 1, rIIIIl..l I: Williams 2.37 • C. ° Lloyd V & kdLC C.I ry T IWeberONW 'V.k ;1 ' r,[ 1, :It. Z r __ 2 AC see o; 550 ELS 1.8-I1C. 4 Iti IN 05'3A °• I`L1 C. Williams O'flARD l ARE ; 2 -' 4 ,••. svy.c4 3 `•" t 4; 45to CD f 7.... I.W. Carve 1ert /I; Charles Rucker 4slssr v Iii, m 1C J. Da d Jcnsen N T..(IrPi I^ 1 esu s. .•-s t./6.I a, 1.59A I.22Ac. I1 `-mot)rec f 6: r 1c gyp. , 14 a ® I; 2.85Ac.04 Ac.I w 1 I, rt.no F E• `k' ( ( I 1, cb 343.t 324tf1 k T. •64 r. • xr I. 1.67Ac J° David Jensen I T TERRY C. Y. WU 7/..o I. I c_i A 0.86AcI4.9O C. so d a j 142 1 5 75aGs: ie 0.56 AC. TI 41 '.I c C 1 1 o c z Z o DCI-o 00 0 os II j °; v 4Q c 0.3B Ac 1 o , I O I S Ito fw >f u v Y „:1izt f01IAcI. Of It s cN . , . rl•. .0_._...._.._. i • . mas " -— ;! o .,,, srRY, [ I I I m co E „5 _ IIkcp' '0C0. O/ OI I I r y e 1 Af. . I 1 F ', ( '1, 1rc' An,v E- I. 3 CC. 11 t3 1IY• II JP 5 NI'0/8) — a ,s1r, C 1 . Li 0 p I a r•, _ 67-,26. 04 RENTONII293831324,k1 i123.$3 — 323.81` 324.02 nLA MC WILLIAMS REZONE R-030-82 in. N c" ' V = VACANT 1ING.E 0 R D EDoSF = SINGLE FAMILY ME = MULTIPLE FAMILY 0`„ • ICOM = COMMERCIAL i I 4 I yd L'I _:2.t4 >o.14L-- Z54 -- ez I7TboY;)E C E3AkFIELD 1 . I' - I ; r:Ton- L -.7-- I I m IAI L. • J I V 11 J/ 1 70 I RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: REZONE (R-030-82) Location: The proposal is located on the east side of Union Avenue N.E. approximately 900 feet north of N.E. 4th Street. Applicant: Sigi Ullrich /Donald E. McWilliams a Public Works Department Engineering Divisioni;! SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 4-14-82 raffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: Utilities Eng. Division Fire Department Parks Department Building Department Police Department Others: Policy Development Dept. COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDEDINWRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: , e Approved (STApproved with Conditions [] Not Approved cam-- (p P- 0 3 / -ia- )- ,t.e.. k Gam. DATE: / Zd/18SignatureofDirectororAuhorizedRepreentative EVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: C;'///--/-/( L. kC I/I/EEiC' Approved proved with Conditions ['Not Approved 7, 5-0 74 c ,'- ( - e--/e - sac 7,--z,)„, . __,„-,.,___.,_V ,---2,-Q ete- t.e//----- / ... 7//--Ty / 2/ . 5 '/—'`,1(_//f f Q' j'-/O r' 47 S"v"-c r e( .,. / 2,4, y _DATE: 0//,f)Z Signature of Director or Authorized Representative revision 3/1981 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: REZONE (R-030-82) Lolcation: The ro oapps 1 is located on the east side of Union Avenue N.E. approximately 900 feet north of N.E. 4th Street. Applicant: Sigi Ullrich /Donald E. McWilliams IQ: Public Works Department Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 4-14-82 Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: Utilities Eng. Division Fi re Department Parks Department Building Department Pit'police Department Others: Policy Development Dept. COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. Ot RE If IEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: POLICE Approved Eg Approved with Conditions ns Not Approved 1) Due to the residen al area that this development-Tslocated the hours of work be limited to Mon. thru Friday 7;00 A.M. to 7:00PM 2) All units be equiped with solid core doors, security locks & windows, and be pre-wired for burglar alarms. 3 Parking lot should be desjsged so tenants do not back out onto the street. Lt.p . n DATE: 4/14/82 Si nature of 'rePctor or Authorized Representative+— REV]EWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: I Approved Approved with Conditions ONot Approved DATE: __ Signature of Director or Authorized Representative cv ra run J/ 17C I RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: REZONE (R-030-82) Location: The proposal is located on the east side of Union Avenue N.E. approximately 900 feet north of N.E. 4th Street. Applicant: Sigi Ullrich /Donald E. McWilliams IQ: Public Works Department Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 4-14-82 OTraffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: Utilities Eng. Division Fire Department 0 Parks Department Building Department Ei Police Department Others: Policy Development Dept. COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved Approved with Conditions ,Not Approved 4/2 awAAn66-fit 7/ &gym/4 J) DATE: 4141g.' Signature of Direc or or Authorized Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved ['Approved with Conditions ['Not Approved DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: REZONE (R-030-82) Location: The proposal is located on the east side of Union Avenue N.E. approximately 900 feet north of N.E. 4th Street. Applicant: Sigi Ullrich /Donald E. McWilliams IQ;public Works Department Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 4-14-82 Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: ligUtilities Eng. Division Fire Department Parks Department Building Department Police Department Others: Policy Development Dept. COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDEDINWRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: i I - Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Q DATE: / '////4/34:7 Signature of Director or/Aut orized Represe tive —' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: l)7-lam/Tv 6--tniNiem/6— 04(pproved Approved with Conditions [' Not Approved NCYe Srii roN ez ADO Obe rf TD L'i 7 e0IA1l" 7- 1,,Aerct- 11.!1jC/1 DATE: 4/iLlf L Signature • Iirector or Authorized Representative UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJECT TO 1/`9/S2 4 LATE COMERS AGREEMENT • WATER 3 2.V LATE COMERS AGREEMENT - SEWER NO SYSTEM Dt'r;:i1PMENT CHARGE • WATER NO r Com,l SYSTEM CEYELOPMENT CHARGE SEWER C . CDAL'/tJ Off— SPECIAL ASSFSSMcNT AREA CHARGE WATER /vp SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE - SEWER No APPROC:D WATER PLAN y r APPROVED SE`AER PLATY y., APPROYEt FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS BY FIRE DEPT. Y` .0 FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: REZONE (R-030-82) Location: The proposal is located on the east side of Union Avenue N.E. approximately 900 feet north of N.E. 4th Street. Applicant: Sigi Ullrich /Donald E. McWilliams IQ;l Public Works Department Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 4-14-82 Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: Utilities Eng. Division 0Fire Department UParks Department Building Department Police Department Others: Policy Development Dept. COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDEDINWRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: El Approved 0Approved with Conditions Not Approved l©/ / /'M 0'70 ,gir/r's g (R te env- DATE: i3/ Z Signature of Director or uthori d Representative y REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved Approved with Conditions El Not Approved DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: REZONE (R-030-82) Location: The proposal is located on the east side of Union Avenue N.E. approximately 900 feet north of N.E. 4th Street. Applicant: Sigi Ullrich 10:public Works Department Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 4-14-82 Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: Utilities Eng. Division Fire Department Parks Department I b uilding Department Police Department Others: Policy Development Dept. COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDEDINWRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: L' > L.c[ pproved Approved with Conditions Not Approved C L __ DATE: Si gnat "re of Director or AuthorizedRepresentative9 VIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : J Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved I DATE: . Signatur of Director or Authorized Representative FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No (s) : R-030-82 Environmental Checklist No. : ECF-030-82 Description of Proposal : Application to rezone 1 . 87 acres of property from G-1 to R-3. Proponent : DONALD E. McWILLIAMS Location of Proposal :Located on the east side of Union Avenue N.E. approximately 900 feet north of N. E. 4th Street. Lead Agency: Building & Zoning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on April 28, 1982, following a presentation by Jerry Lind of the Building & Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Ronald Nelson, Roger Blaylock, Jerry Lind, Gary Norris , James Hanson, James Matthew and Richard Houghton. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-030-82 are the following: 1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by: Michael Miller DATED: March 30, 1982 2) Applications: REZONE (R-030-82) 3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Parks & Recreation Department, Police Department, Building Zoning Department, Fire Department , Utility Engineering Division, Traffic Engineering Division and Design Engineering Division. Recommendation for a declaration of significance: Policy Development Department. Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development has a non-significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43. 21C. 030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: Will not adversely impact adjacent properties or the environment and the following condition shall be complied with: Lot Number 9 and Tract "A" (common open area) are to exchange locations so that the road, if necessary, can be expanded eastward at a latter time. A temporary 50 foot cul-de-sac turn around will be required at the end of this roadway. FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE1DONALDE. McWILLIAMS APRIL 28, 1982 PAGE TWO Signatures : i4k/ 76;1(47 /3164(a, Ronald G. Nelson David R. Clemens Building & Zoning Director Policy Development Director i hard C. Houghton/ Public Works Director DATE OF PUBLICATION : May 3, 1982 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: May 17 , 1982 Date circulated LI L 8, 1982 Commei. a e : APRIL 13 , 1982 ENVIRONIMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 030 - 82 APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-030-82) PROPONENT :SIGI ULLRICH/DONALD E. McWILLIAMS PROJECT TITLE : UNION AVENUE REZONE Brief Description of Project : Application to rezone property from G-1 to R-3 for a plat containing nine duplex lots. Loca ed on the east side of union Avenue N. E. approximately LOCATION :900 feet north of N. E. 4th Street. SITE AREA :1 . 87 acres BUILDING AREA (gross ) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEL NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes :X 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :X 3 ) Water & water courses : X 4 ) Plant life : X 5 ) Animal life : X 6 ) Noise : X 7 ) Light & glare : X 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : Single Family Uses_ View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : X 10 ) Risk of upset : X 11 ) Population/Employment : X 12 ) Number of Dwellings :X 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : 142 traffic impacts : Minor 14 ) Public services : X 15 ) Energy : X 16 ) Utilities: X 17 ) Human health : X 18 ) Aesthetics : X 19 ) Recreation: X • 20 ) Archeology/history : X COMMENTS : Signatures: J t' c= _ ill 14( Ronald G. Nelson David R. Clemens Building Official Policy Development Director 1'/ ,' t'y"' Richard C. Houghton, Public Works Director OF R4, 4, BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT o RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 9 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 09g1 SEPtE P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR May 24 , 1982 Donald E. McWilliams 2820 Lake Washington Blvd. N. Renton, WA 98055 Re : APPLICATION TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO R-3, FILE R-030-82, AND APPLICATION:::OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR NINE DUPLEX LOTS ON A 1 . 87 ACRE PARCEL, FILE PP-031-82 ; LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF UNION AVENUE N.E. APPROXIMATELY 900 FEET NORTH OF N.E. 4TH STREET. Dear Mr. McWilliams : The Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on May 3, 1982. A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for June 1 , 1982, at 9 : 00 a.m. Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing. If you have any further questions, please call the Renton Building and Zoning Department, 235-2550. Very truly yours , Rece,tc)-7--skAl Roger J. Blayloc Zoning Administrator RJB :cl cc : Mr. Sigi Ullrich Mr. Michael Miller, P.E. , Triad Associates NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND . USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON JUNE 1 , 1982, AT 9 : 00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: DONALD W. McWILLIAMS Application to rezone property from G-1 to R-3 , Multiple Family Residential, file R-030-82; located on the east side of Union Avenue N.E. approximately 900 feet north of N.E. 4th Street . DONALD W. McWILLIAMS Application for preliminary plat for nine lots to construct duplexes on an 1 . 87 acre parcel , file PP-031-82; located on the east side of Union Avenue N.E. approximately 900 feet north of N.E. 4th Street. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JUNE 1 , 1982 , AT 9 : 00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED: May 21 , 1982 RONALD G. NELSON BUILDING AND ZONING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I , STEVE MUNSON, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public , in and for the State of Washington residing in King County, on the 19th day of May, 1982 . C r al-,-sE- SIGNED: NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance with conditions for the following project : Donald W. McWilliams (ECF-030-82) Application to rezone property from G-1 to R-3, file R-030-82, and application of a preliminary plat for nine duplex lots on a 1 . 87 acre parcel, file PP-031-82 ; located on the east side of Union Avenue N.E. approximately 900 feet north of N.E. 4th Street . Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550 . Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by May 17, 1982. Published : May 3 , 1982 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance with conditions for the following project : Donald W. McWilliams (ECF-030-82) Application to rezone property from G-1 to R-3, file R-030-82, and application of a preliminary plat for nine duplex lots on a 1 . 87 acre parcel, file PP-031-82; located on the east side of Union Avenue N.E. approximately 900 feet north of N.E. 4th Street. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by May 17, 1982. Published: May 3 , 1982 FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No (s) : R-030-82 Environmental Checklist No. : ECF-030-82 Description of Proposal : Application to rezone 1 . 87 acres of property from G-1 to R-3. Proponent : DONALD E. McWILLIAMS Location of Proposal: Located on the east side of Union Avenue N.E. approximately 900 feet north of N.E. 4th Street. Lead Agency: Building & Zoning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on April 28, 1982, following a presentation by Jerry Lind of the Building & Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Ronald Nelson, Roger Blaylock, Jerry Lind, Gary Norris , James Hanson, James Matthew and Richard Houghton. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-030-82 are the following: 1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by: Michael Miller DATED: March 30, 1982 2) Applications: REZONE (R-030-82) 3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Parks & Recreation Department, Police Department, Building Zoning Department, Fire Department, Utility Engineering Division, Traffic Engineering Division and Design Engineering Division. Recommendation for a declaration of significance: Policy Development Department. Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development has a non-significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43. 21C. 030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: Will not adversely impact adjacent properties or the environment and the following condition shall be complied with: Lot Number 9 and Tract "A" (common open area) are to exchange locations so that the road, if necessary, can be expanded eastward at a latter time. A temporary 50 foot cul-de-sac turn around will be required at the end of this roadway. FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE DONALD E. McWILLIAMS APRIL 28, 1982 PAGE TWO Signatures : 4?'///e 2,---, 17 (2d/ ljtiekat ' 1 Ro ld G. Nelson David R. Clemens Building & Zoning Director Policy Development Director i' il Ri dST1(Houghtor Z‘------ Public Works Direc or DATE OF PUBLICATION: May 3, 1982 j EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: May 17, 1982 1 Date circulated : APRIL 8, 1982 Comments due : APRIL 13, 1982 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 030 - 82 APPLICATION No (s) . REZONE (R-030-82) PROPONENT :SIGI ULLRICH/DONALD E. McWILLIAMS PROJECT TITLE : UNION AVENUE REZONE Brief Description of Project : Application to rezone property from G-1 to R-3 for a plat containing nine duplex lots. i,bated on the east side or union Avenue iv.t. apprcximaiely LOCATION :900 feet north of N. E. 4th Street. SITE AREA :1 . 87 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes :X 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :X 3 ) Water & water courses : X 4 ) Plant life : X 5 ) Animal life : X 6) Noise : X 7 ) Light & glare : X 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : Single Family Uses_ View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : X 10 ) Risk of upset : X 11 ) Population/Employment : X 12 ) Number of Dwellings :X 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : 142 traffic impacts : Minor 14 ) Public services : x 15 ) Energy : x 16 ) Utilities: x 17 ) Human health: X 18) Aesthetics : X 19 ) Recreation : X 20 ) Archeology/history : X _ COMMENTS : Signatures: z/e- d-ii- e- 3- -_____7) / 1/C/ 7 R nald G. Nelson D vid R. Clemens Building Official Policy Development Director Richard C. Houghton, Public Works Director TRAM Date circulated : april 8, 1982 Comments due : April 13, 1982 EMIVIR0MIMERTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF — 030 — 82 APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-030-82) PROPONENT : Sigi Ullrich /Donald E. McWilliams PROJECT TITLE : Union Avenue Rezone Brief Description of Project : Application to rezone property from G-1 to R-3 for a plat containing nine duplex lots. LOCATION : The proposal is located on the east side of Union Avenue N.E. approximately 900 feet north of N.E. 4th Street. SITE AREA : 1.87 acres BUILDING AREA (gross ) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 1/"" 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : v 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 7.- 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : Lam` 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : I/ .-. L- i traffic impacts : 1--1-11 Lim V-- 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : C/ '. 17 ) Human health : L-- 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : L-- 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMEN/T/ ff-e) li. S : cA„ _ K y P Kirke_cv 2 5 -Pc4a,, ,,,,,54..14 ,;..) /7/ y s -4'4,4/%f c/ - - 1-- fo co s Llt-15„411 Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information Reviewed by : L /`L 1 y` "17 • Iitle Yi.i////- ` i, Date : h-/ iZ-- FORM: ERC-06 PARve Date circulated : April 8, 1982 Comments due : April 13, 1982 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECI - 030 - 82 APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-030-82) PROPONENT : Sigi Ullrich /Donald E. McWilliams PROJECT TITLE : Union Avenue Rezone Brief Description of Project : Application to rezone property from G-1 to R-3 for a plat containing nine duplex lots. LOCATION : The proposal is located on the east side of Union Avenue N.E. approximately 900 feet north of N.E. 4th Street. SITE AREA : 1.87 acres BUILDING AREA (gross ) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : I 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : t/ 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : 1 /NO mP73-C 7 Cyr/ Pg/e`S 1 /Re--ROAT/6/0 Fi9C/G/7-76sS. Recommendation : DNSI - DOS More Information at-Jt4.4.1) 1° Reviewed by :0- 7 I itle : We- --44- t_ i e Date : 11 //.3/ 7z- FORM: ERC-06 VTILI"ritZ Date circulated : tipril 8, 1982 Comments due : April 13j 1982 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 030 - 82 APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-030-82) PROPONENT : Sigi Ullrich/Donald E. McWilliams PROJECT TITLE : Union Avenue Rezone Brief Description of Project : Application to rezone property from G-1 to R-3 for a plat containing nine duplex lots. LOCATION : The proposal is located on the east side of Union Avenue N.E. approximately 900 feet north of N.E. 4th Street. SITE AREA : 1.87 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : l/ 4 ) Plant life : 1/ 5 ) Animal life : k 6 ) Noise : l/ 7 ) Light & glare : 1. v 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : l / 10 ) Risk of upset : 1,/ 11 ) Population/Employment : yZ 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 1 ' 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services :V 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : i 18 ) Aesthetics : 17 19 ) Recreation : U 20 ) Archeology/history : L COMMENTS : Recommendation : SI : AiiilDOSMoreInformationOFReviewedby : 1 itle : C Ti,L/? y i 6/Ai,,5,C.CiA/C Date : 411z-/g2, FORM: ERC-06 Fi RE Date circulated : April 8, 1982 Comments due : April 13, 1982 ENIVIROINMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 030 - 82 APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-030-82) PROPONENT : Sigi Ullrich /Donald E. McWilliams PROJECT TITLE : Union Avenue Rezone Brief Description of Project : Application to rezone property from G-1 to R-3 for a plat containing nine duplex lots. LOCATION : The proposal is located on the east side of Union Avenue N.E. approximately 900 feet north of N.E. 4th Street. SITE AREA : 1.87 acres BUILDING AREA (gross ) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE 1 ) Topographic changes : INFO 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life :Lam/ 5 ) Animal life : V 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : trX 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south :IV west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : T ------- 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : r 12 ) Number of Dwellings : c 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :C-- traffic impacts :1 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : t---- 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : ti----- 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : D SI DOS More Information r...4?(-_'- _Reviewed by : l itle :h Date . f2 i FORM: ERC-06 raw OLDiM7 Date circulated : Hpril 8, 1982 Comments due : April 13, 1982 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEV SHEET ECF — 030 — 82 APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-030-82) PROPONENT : Sigi Ullrich /Donald E. McWilliams PROJECT TITLE : Union Avenue Rezone Brief Description of Project : Application to rezone property from G-1 to R-3 for a plat containing nine duplex lots. LOCATION : The proposal is located on the east side of Union Avenue N.E. approximately 900 feet north of N.E. 4th Street. SITE AREA : 1.87 acres BUILDING AREA (gross ) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : X 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : X 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : X 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : K 16 ) Utilities :x 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : X 19 ) Recreation : 3 20 ) Archeology/history : x COMMENTS : Recommendation : IDNSI V DOS More Information Reviewed byCy, lit le :l •. Z06 / ) / >z. Date : FORM: ERC-06 44 Date circulated : april 8, 1982 Comments due : April 13, 1982 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 030 - 82 APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-030-82) PROPONENT : Sigi Ullrich /Donald E. McWilliams PROJECT TITLE : Union Avenue Rezone Brief Description of Project : Application to rezone property from G-1 to R-3 for a plat containing nine duplex lots. LOCATION : The proposal is located on the east side of Union Avenue N.E. approximately 900 feet north of N.E. 4th Street. SITE AREA : 1.87 acres BUILDING AREA (gross ) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information Reviewed by : ,e/ 1 itle : Date : (/— l FORM: ERC-06 rext crl Pei Date circulated : April 8, 1982 Comments due : April 13, 1982 EXVIRO\MENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 030 - 82 APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-030-82) PROPONENT : Sigi Ullrich /Donald E. McWilliams PROJECT TITLE : Union Avenue Rezone Brief Description of Project : Application to rezone property from G-1 to R-3 for a plat containing nine duplex lots. LOCATION : The proposal is located on the east side of Union Avenue N.E. approximately 900 feet north of N.E. 4th Street. SITE AREA : 1.87 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : r Land use conflicts : „// Q j4/ Vie w obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : r 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : J traffic impacts : 4a/) VI—W4 _ A/6 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : N I OS More Information Reviewed by : itle : e Date : FORM: ERC-06 DeSKIIM E161. Date circulated : April 8, 1982 Comments due : April 13, 1982 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 030 - 82 APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-030-82) PROPONENT : Sigi Ullrich /Donald E. McWilliams PROJECT TITLE : Union Avenue Rezone Brief Description of Project : Application to rezone property from G-1 to R-3 for a plat containing nine duplex lots. LOCATION : The proposal is located on the east side of Union Avenue N.E. approximately 900 feet north of N.E. 4th Street. SITE AREA : 1.87 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (o) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 1/ 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : o' 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : L,, 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : L.-- 10 ) Risk of upset : 1 . 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : i ..---' 17 ) Human health: v, 18 ) Aesthetics : i 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : e_e__ (P P- 03 i -6 a ) ) ' Recommendation : DNSI X' DOS More Information_ Reviewed by :,241-2.- title : Date : fie . (..-- FORM: ERC-06 OF RA,A BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 0 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 0, 9grD SEPSEP BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MEMORANDUM MAYOR April 14, 1982 TO: File FROM: Jerry Lind SUBJECT: Donald E. McWilliams R-030-82, PP-031-82 The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) today reviewed the above listed applications. It was determined that a proposed declaration of non-significance be issued subject to further review from the Parks & Recreation Department. The Committee decided that the proposed Lot 9 and Tract A" (common open area) be reversed so that the roadway serving this plat could possibly be expanded at a later time. It was also agreed on that a temporary turn- around be provided at the end of this road. JFL/mp NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance subject to conditions for the following project: E & B DEVELOPERS, INC. (ECF-025-82) Application to rezone property from G-1 & L-1 to B-1 for combination office/retail building and veterinary clinic, file R-026-82; located on S.W. Grady Way and S.W. 12th Street between Seneca Avenue S .W. and Raymond Avenue S.W. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a proposed declaration of non-significance for the following project : DONALD E. McWILLIAMS (ECF-030-82) Application to rezone property from G-1 to R-3 , file R-030-82, and application of a preliminary plat for nine duplex lots on a 1 . 87 acre parcel, file PP-031-82; located on the east side of Union Avenue N. E. approximately 900 feet north of N.E. 4th Street . Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by May 3, 1982. Published : April 19, 1982 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Y6 APRIL 14, 1982 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 10: 00 A.M. : THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM PENDING BUSINESS ECF-013-82 EVERGREEN PROPERTIES J.V. SP-u15-82 SA-u16-82 ECF-O 22-8 2 DEAN W. BITNEY R-023-82 SP-028-82 PMH-029-82 OLD BUSINESS ECF-025-82 E & B DEVELOPERS, INC. R-026- j2 Application to rezone property from G-1 L-1 to B-1 for combination office/retail building and veterinary clinic; located on S.W. Grady way and S.W. 12th Street between Seneca Avenue S.W. and Raymond Avenue S.W. NEW BUSINESS ECF-030-82 DONALD E. McWILLIAMS R-030-82 Application to rezone property from G-1PP-031-82 to R-3 and application of a preliminary plat for nine duplex lots on a 1 . 87 acre parcel; located on the east side of Union Avenue N.E. approximately 900 feet north of N. E. 4th Street. ECF-031-82 M.A. SEAGALE INC. SP-032-82 Application for a fill and grade permit to fill a 70 foot deep hole with 1 , 100, 000 cubic yards of fill material; located 330 feet south of the southwest intersection of Monroe Avenue N. E. and N. E. 4th Street. 44 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIE% )MMITTEE AGENDA APRIL 14, 1982 PAGE TWO ECF-032-82 THOMAS R. DAHLBY R-033 -81 Application to rezone property from R-1 to L-1 for development of office and storage facilities; located at 1412 Maple Avenue S.W.. ECF-033-82 GREATER RENTON SHOPPING CENTER, INC. B-275 Application to build a two-story building for retail store outlets and office space; located approximately in the north corner of N. E. 10th Street and N. E. Sunset Blvd. ECF-0i1-81 SUPERSTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT, LTD. SA-06E-81 The site plan has been modified by the reduction of two units and the community center; the former plan had received Hearing Examiner approval . ECF-053-81 HIGHLINE VILLAGE B-253 Comments from Environmental Impact Statement. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMM EE 4TAGENDAII ", , APRIL 14, 1982 PAGE THREE I I1ii Ii. a ek 1iI by 4iiir_ L ( -- I,..1 1 t_ alb ltl= NZLAKEli i WASHINGTON Ii liFi 1 A 1 ia r litill';-:- -: GREATER RENTON SHOPPING CENTER i Al law .„,11 1 1 ro f i t. 1 DONALD E. McWILLIAMS I . t \ \, lin SUPERSTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT, LTD 4 ......t J I PkF I , 1 U _411 14/ L 40 M.A. SEAGALE, INC. 11 1 111 In IC it rLDEAJBIEYTI :- tJ 1, v• ICI ! rrpiiy HIGHLINE VILLAGE , j, E & B DEVELOPERS , INC. .!! ,M1 _ f I 1 THOMAS R. DAHLBY t iftp 1 EVERGREEN PROPERTIES J.V. 1 Ilea i FAJFT1--r. i ki 1 1 1=EIS ' 4 t pi r17. 1 I I l f..l t I I Tt 14 C t i L L. 11 -I I ...... I e 1 1 1 --1 i -... YOUNGS i I- r 1 1gT179 1 CITY C7 RENTCN REZONE APPLICM ION For Office Use Only: APPL. NO. Dad PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION 50 FEE; RECEIPT NO. ,p1'./,lJ APPEAL FILED FILING DATE sgo- CITY COUNCIL ACTION HEARING DATE ORDINANCE NO. & DATE APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 10 : 1 . Name Donald E. McWilliams phone 2 . Address 2820 Lake Washington Blvd. N. , Renton, WA 98055 3 . Property petitioned for rezoning is located on Union Avenue between N.E. 4th Street and Sunset Boulevard 4 . Square footage or acreage of property 1 . 87 acres 5 . Legal description of property (if more space is required , attach separate sheet) The south 132 feet of the north 431 feet of the NWa of the Eswo of Section 10 , Township 23 N, Range 5E, WM, in King County Washington. 6 . Existing zoning G Zoning Requested R-3" NOTE TO APPLICANT: The following factors are considered in reclass- ifying property. Evidence or additional information to substantiate your request may be attached to this sheet . (See Application Procedure sheet for specific requirements) . Submit this form in duplicate. 7 . Proposed use of site. Subdivision of site into 9 duplex lots 8 . List the measures to be taken to reduce impact on the surrounding area. Extension of sanitary sewer to serve the site; temporary erosion control during construction; storm drainage system as required; provision of "dry" sewer for late connections from the north. 9 . How soon after the rezone is granted do you intend to develop the - site? Immediately 10. Two copies of plot plan and affidavit of ownership are required. Planning Dept . 2-73 K TY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ' Application No. d Environment al Checklist No. PROPOSED, date:FINAL , date: 0 Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance aDeclaration of Non-Significance 0 Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS : Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required , or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM i . BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent Sidi Ullrich 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: P.O. Box 964 Renton, WA 93057 206) 271-6303 3. Date Checklist submitted 4. Agency requiring Checklist City of Renton 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: Union Avenue Rezone 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : The proposal is to rezone a 1 .87-acre parcel from its present "G" classification to an "R-3" classification and to approve a prelimin- ary plat for nine duplex lots on this parcel . 2- 7., Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : The proposal is located on the eactgide of Union Avenue, approximately 900 feet north of N.E. 4th Street 8 . Estimated date for completion of the proposal : 9j. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal federal , state and local --including rezones) : rezone; preliminary plat; clearing and grading; building.9 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion , or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: NO 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal ? If yes , explain : NO 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: Attached: rezone and preliminary plat applications II. :NVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in : a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? YES MAYBE NO b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil? X YES MAYBE NO c) Change in topography or ground surface relief Xfeatures? YES MAYBE 3 d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? YES MBE 0 e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? X YES MAYBE NO f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation , deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: The proposed development would entail some clearing of vegetation and grading of the site for the roi4, building pals and driveways and would require the conipoction of soils in thece areas During construction, when soils are exposed, the possibility of wind and water erosion will exist. 2) Air. Will the proposal result in : a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality?AS MAYBE NO b) The creation of objectionable odors? X YES MAYBE NO c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature , or any change in climate , either locally or X regionally? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Traffic from the proposed development, both during and after construction, will contribute marginally to air quality deterioration. Air-borne dust raised during construction may also affect air quality temporarily -LA the site's vicinity. 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? YES MAYBE NO b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X YES MAYBE NO c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X YES MAYBE NO d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? YES MAYBE NO e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? YES MAYBE N f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X YES MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X YES MAYBE NO h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection , or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? YES MAYBE i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: The use of impervious surfaces on the site will interrupt some absorption of water into the soil and may somewhat reduce the amount of ground water ebhar!ge. 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass , crops , microflora and aquatic plants)? X YES MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique , rare or endangered species of flora? YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area , or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? YES MA BE NO d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? y— — MAYBE 6-- Explanation: The construction of a road and houses nn the cite will necessitate removal of some existing Vegetation. After cnnctrurtinn, lawns and new shrubbery may be added as landscaping around the houses. 4- 5) Fauna. 4ill the proposal result in: a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? X YES MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area , or result in a barrier to the migration or movement Xoffauna? YES MAYBE NO d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Some small land animals that presently use the site will probably be lost due to the proposed development. 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? YES MAYBE NS Explanation: Automobile and brume lights will be added to the site vicinity. 8) Land Use. Wil! the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: The proposal would change the citeic 70nin9 from "G" to "R-3" and would develop nine lots on the presently vacant land 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X YES MAYBE NO b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X TES MAYBE NO Explanation: y(11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Y S RTTNT3 Explanation: The proposed development could increase the population of the City by up to 60 persons. r 5- 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing , or create a demand for additional housing? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: The proposed development would add 18 housing units to the City. 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in : a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X YES MAYBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand Xfornewparking? YES MAYBE NO c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X YES MAYBE NO d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? YES MAYBE NO e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X YES MAYBE NO f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: SPP attached. 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? X YES MAYBE NO b) Police protection? X YES MAYBE NO c) Schools? X YES MAYBE NO d) Parks or other recreational facilities? X YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? X YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services? X YES MAYbE NO Explanation: The proposed development will increase the need fnr police and fire protection as well as the demand for parks and recreational facilities. The project will introduce up to 20 students to the school system and will build a road requiring City maintenance. 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in : a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X YES MAYBE NO b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Existing sources of energy will be used to pnwer con.strtiction equipment and, later, the homes that would be built. 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities : a) Power or natural gas? YES MAYBE NO b) Communications systems? YES MAYBE NU c) Water? X YES MAYBE NO 1 6- d) Sewer or septic tanks? X YES MAYBE NO e) Storm water drainage? YES MAYBE NO f) Solid waste and disposal ? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: See attached for a discussion of the sanitary sewer proposal . 17,) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X YES MAYBE WO- Explanation: 1$) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view?X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 1 ) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 0) ArcheologicalfHistorical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: III. IGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Agent for Proponent: sig ) tichael Miller, Triad AccoriateS name printed City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 I 13) Transportation/Cil ation. The proposed 18 housing units could add approximately 180 vehicle trips each day to the vicinity road network, based on ITE nationwide average statis- tics . Most of this traffic will likely be coming or going through the Union Avenue/N.E. 4th Street intersection south of the site. For the 21-month period ending in April 1981 , this intersection averaged 2.75 accidents per million vehicles, compared to the state average of 0.9. At this high rate, the statis- tics indicate that the accidents are probably caused by the characteristics of the intersection. In April 1981 improvements were made at this intersection in the forms of left-turn signal phasing of the light and the addition of left-turn pockets. In the three months following the installation of these, there were no accidents at this intersection. William E. Popp Associates , in a traffic study for a separate nearby development, noted that most of the accidents prior to the im- provements involved vehicles turning left from 4th onto Union and that the addition of signal phasing and turn pockets caused a "dramatic reduction in accidents. " (Northward PUD Transportation Impact Analysis , March 1982. ) The pm peak hour level of service (LOS) at this intersection in 1981 was "C" . Another traffic concern in the vicinity includes N.E. 4th west of Union to where it becomes N.E. 3rd and then intersects Sunset Boulevard, which provides the pri- mary access to I-405 for the site and its vicinity. East of Duvall Avenue, 4th become SE 128th St. , and this arterial NE 3rd/NE 4th/SE 128th would be the major distributor of the project's expected 180 ADT. The intersection of NE 3rd and Sunset experienced a large number of accidents (21/year) through July 1981 , but for the volume of traffic this number is not critical . In 1981 this intersection operated at LOS "C" . The City has proposed to widen NE 4th/NE 3rd from Union to Sunset to a continuous five-lane roadway with a two-way left turn lane. This work would also include resurfacing, curbs , gutters , sidewalks and drainage, and it is scheduled to begin in 1982. Traffic from the proposed project (180 ADT) would have no measurable effect on the operations of these roadways and intersections . 16 (d) Sanitary Sewer The proponent intends to install a lift station to pump sewage under Union Avenue to an existing manhole about 250 feet south of the site. The pro- ponent will construct and maintain this lift station. The proponent will also install a "dry" sewer at his front property line that will later be connected to an anticipated gravity system that will flow from about 1500 feet north of the site south past the site and adjacent properties. When this line is com- pleted through to the south, or at least to a connection at N.E. 4th, the devel- oper will abandon his lift station. Completion of the line depends on develop- ment of other nearby property. See attached Sanitary Sewer Study 7-Or 1Ca1 U1..LRLC CRE-rR ZC 14E- \\-a-0QL71-R_AM cAi..,,ITAR`1 C F-uoi-t2, :..`curJ%/ Rok THE IJO17tH Ri ''AJIi uN T 'i±-L...oi=,ramp"- " ay Z1At AS; c..01 Dc.1-o FP.... \I 8 t .) A:Svtrr. ?t?c =t...0`•- -,: ar„R.E .(co NSF t.-.4-I S.:t*,Y\ ( Y L.A.IOUT " 1 S O. 5 blo (Av cm}. (FDR FuiZK'=m.e, OF r T,vy`A! C." P,PF ...1$FC., 4w3-1-1c. 1 i'A<V T-orotzr ^.n, t-r,T_ wF 2 zF...,JNS c: ci,) '-r'V'‘'_ 1-V1C9H-wC7, 7 ...,S IVY R.Abl'-1 ,- SGrcV,DISAZI0 \ s' t=1CoV21c. 21Nr T".t MCArT - ) S`rUD! , 1> VvlvCZE -VOLL) c.001-21 Tt>..)Ca f: c, M 1Ii- 4 1'0N- 0rt,, * L-emF L^-THGW <1 1_ : 4 Prate.. x lt., 4.2.Pc = —1, aCO v-1 Et 49Ca1,. - F- ' \-"/ : 9 .3 AL ti s u.s ,, 3 co..G. y km coz7b = i 3 cf ..?-D AGE Ve!‘T pc l ch.. 1 , ISCD --i›;. 0•C5,:2oi M(ab 0, 0518CS z -7 i x, 'mA,,)N,N.. . cSk;cti (ret;cC ) _ , 1G0 Q (am) z QQ // yz 0.o05 '/ r, J Q.o?8 or' 3. 30 " ( MCP z) cNAtc k w,vE--- na. QF a't> G NH 4 a i 1-z4..,m Sst-,,r E. a1 , i5O GP, 1/4 L0c.1_, dFe..c,`t y me CV)--Atr\%L-Y : 073, 04(0 GP lb L./4 , 190 GP i PFA.ke, c 2 5"51 '14,19v =110, `-17 5 Co D j 0. 110S MC2D Cs-) impci b . 3Co,5 01'3 v 3) c c u, bo§. G M}I- 14 AP .1 E ply, 190 5rr+/ Kky-Z k-cir`n' 3 .470 x \ v Is,0-5 ez- 2.D PEE- A.. 100 CoPa S I Cca ce P nc wY r 2go.a 1 7 ,3 b PtPr\kF+-czv 7 ..5 x77,358 = 14313q5 U 00934 MGG 0, a4 ?5 p a y ' or . y " ( use %" C 6 i) C.‘w_Gk u Mr 3 ( i r.) O ZL`r ass p GommFRU A L 7 A rnt tON 1 .a {z<_IF.i Goo F'f IO , PE Me, i-+_au, =7 Z,S 10o9 , 11 = 057, 103 Pp 0 , 39.-7Sc-Cs 0,500co / or (9 , 0 L. w z,c,w ga o, T ccL V z Rom-.rp 11.37r racy L cZ TRON c L N; ( av>=RT: ` r 1Mlf RZT; DST, 1-1 1-4 . R,m Eun/- O . 5% 0•7 S bio a`Ve O Vo Ex,n-, 1-1 FT S i Zoo. M 07 yob 39-7 2 ( - 1.3') 3R7 7 (-• s)i IT? (-Lii) 39L (a-3) Ml1-y 0"/ 39514 o,z) 34?f 3? r ( 11.$) I-7 MI4-6 7 34a ( 'O)] S ? c (9,-7) n11 (5,1)pZ (6.8) 55-6 I too 9-9 I E9 34M ad) 38 7'-'( rz•s) 3811 (15.6.) 3'* ' 4,410 2416 3 7 (8,8) 385Z (b.$) I 94 4 u.(.) q 370 i/ /a 3/o 3S51 (44,) i 3928 (-7M) ' 381 G ( 8,y) 377T ( IJ.S) y0' f f I 1 M/71 13 5,4) 3311 (6,5) a0L (4.G ) ! 376, 1 ( 14.0) a70' N H' 15 Z90 f a33 c (' 7,0) max)' ) 3 59- ((z) 631) R My 18 388 3-11 (8.S) 3'+`I (,3,yj 37as (i6•s) ALL.t,aER$ G ALLvt<A-rs p vSl ( T1} Ar?otr G iZACiSS FLvs 0.1 i ALkzo-_c H LI_ ?11A ry No V 1 J f i 09. `7 \^ 4J0 140' WA.:7D P.u.L:. Ti }1 11 X uI I I I i 1\\ , 401 111 3I II Iippo,,, • ri apse LIFT Vona 11 II r I II 1\\ -... X 402Iti ' 0:: ,: 8 R TREE I, Ili M.1-1. 1 I r- O II Z II o o rill. 1 vIW . u. i M.0 4 1 co III I 11 a_,• is j11 415 u j X 403 1 x !) 1f m.14. a Uo r<i N W K DI1argIapu. P. pi X 404 rif I.. A*piIIIA1-1.7 4 1 ' M.l7.8 i x 10 • X 412 TREES W 4:9IM. U. kOf:10 3 U r, uaCruwn vu.r. 1 M.u. 9 I I TREES , X 409 I I M.4-1- 11 A! A. I. 40 EW 1 x \ J ; a... . avo,,,ogpflikI71.--C-- M.u. 12 u p, II ' r XaI,ei I ,1 1, 0. I TRI Q 11 (r M.4J. 13 X 412 418 C u, / l-if. ci / 1 lit" 416 \. I1IlIb00xIII01 0 11I 401 X I ele -=-IMMI=" 717 DX x 39 11 I Myµ• 15 r 1'.. 1 1 u R>*neb u. NmeusM4I. 1 Co I// X 4 l I I I µ. I 1 o e x I x i X419 i M.u. 17 X 389 -1 1 xi I x '` 1 1 i.c, sT. W x 1 xMt. µ.TREES k I sl i 1,.. \ ill 4 00__---____ ti. BR. I I t1402 \:1 4......,Vm gEW E " V vr.3 1 j 11144111)111 9 I-4- E1 FO2 YS 1 B _ B N .I- 1 , n 1 I 11 I.. / - . I -1 F r-Ti O1-1•- VIZ I I M.4. 1. I I; x¢, L7eLIYIT e,2 TO 60 8 I II 41110 S AFFIDAVIT I , Donald E. McWilliams being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this .) ) day of March 19 82 , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at iC A/ . 7 a e of, N tart' Public ignature of Owner) A_YJ y' N't Su,vst r i j 2820 Lake Washington Blvd. N. Address) Address) tZty 51 !f 1 /) 1071 Q .••a Renton, WA 98055 Als,r i City) State) tn: AIl' aS-J — ( o /7 ties et+ +Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application . Date Received 19 By: Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 eceipt # CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT NAME DATE PROJECT & LOCATION Application Type Basic Fee Acreage Fee Total co Environmental Checklist Environmental Checklist Construction Valuation Fee TOTAL FEES UiruC: Please t,ike this receipt and your payment to the Finance Department on the first floor. Thank yoga. ENDING OF FILE Fig TITLE