HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA74-789 \ P
, PS
N \ • $. RENTOIJ VILLAGE ,L -_ '
liN R
.i------
_ . Tt
. irlfrinAo :, Nil"
'ir ''1411t141414 ' 0014116!) I IIIIIIIIPPI
53
u a�� i. ��\y o-
{ o4
4/ 7 ugpeliMICIimagiqiim
7:= ma N.‘,,.:44.714,e i 45!
- raoovdo� `t, 5 fill a 13 7 4,15
�ee� T
e.
A9:°
ook
. R • . 14/4° tOiri
. 4 a
, ., .. . ..,,, , : .._ „L .,. ,„,, .i.
,_..., ii,,... ....,.......„ -..:,...,„ ow. al \\ 1. k;'ThW ' 44 4
an
o�°oo
^7 Ire if. x $R.
• . -
ri e! !I ID �2 L. `\
♦ _ 4
, ki A , i. eip,..
'°' '41 , al1=!. WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS CO . : t 4
- - ' - t SPECIAL PERMIT iI—•
SITE APPROVAL ♦'•' \ • �"°
G-9 •
00 i .4
y
g , . ..1..hr4 1 G:7200 i• 3
14 d m��• »,f -.�' ti';.99 �?'°I I A IS I ` ♦,\\F3!
144
7, 8 • II
eD . �'m�m„ -- •• - I: ��o..':"hi,D D 14-0.1 7—`�I.^ _- �! ^-_�R
SPECIAL PERMIT AND 'SITE' 'APPROVAL 'APPLICANION :
WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS CO . ; Appl . No . SP-789-74; special permit to allow
filling and grading in R-1 zone; property located between S . Puget Dr.
and Williams Ave. S .
AND Appl . No. SA-790-74 ; site approval to add storage capacity to existing
peak shaving plant in the form of (20) 30 ,000 gallon underground propane
tanks in R-1 zone ; property as listed above .
APPLICANT WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS CO. TOTAL AREA 1701± acres
PRINCIPAL ACCESS South Puget Drive ,
EXISTING ZONING R- 1 '
EXISTING USE Peak shaving plant for storage & distribution of
natural, gas . -
PROPOSED USE Additional storage capacity to existing peak shaving
plant in the form of (2U ) 30 ,000 gallon tanks .
COMPREHENSIVE' LAND USE PLAN Single family residential
COMMENTS Proposed use allowed by site approval . Original facility
approved by Planning Commission July 22 , 1964 .
I JV/AP
BEGINNING
OF FILE
FILE TITLE SPECIAL PERMIT SP- 789- 7y
IN R.- 1 ZONE 9/07/
WASNINGTON NATURAL GRS COMPANY
/r
---
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
FOR
STORAGE TANK EXPANSION
AT
DAVID W. SWARR PEAK SHAVING FACILITY
RENTON, WASHINGTON
of R(c%\)
ENro
U 21514 F
P4
`9�N/NG
FOR:
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS COMPANY
SEPTEMBER 23, 1974
BY:
IOW r
of wa5hi •ny P. Tessitore
"�,
n,
' ABC/S,�R�O �.�,•
INTRODUCTION
Responsible Agency
City of Renton
City Hall
Renton, Washington
Objective of the Environmental Assessment
The objective of this assessment is to provide the responsible agency
with environmental, scientific and engineering data. From this, a determination
of environmental significance may be made by the City, pursuant to the Washing-
ton State Environmental Policy Act of 1971.
Scope of the Environmental Assessment
The scope of this assessment includes the following:
A. To describe the proposed expansion of existing propane tank storage
facilities in Renton, Washington.
B. To discuss the need and justification for the proposed action.
C. To describe the existing conditions both man-made and natural at
the site of the proposed expansion.
D. To analyze and discuss the potential beneficial and adverse impacts
of the proposed expansion.
E. To describe mitigating measures to be taken to reduce impacts.
F. To consider alternatives to the proposed facilities.
- 1 -
- 2 -
A. The Proposed Action
1. Administrative Action
The Washington Natural Gas Company will undertake administrative approval
procedures to allow the expansion of existing peak shaving facilities.
Two permits are sought prior to construction of the proposed facilities.
a. A grading permit from the City of Renton.
b. An approval from the Renton Planning Commission for the addition of
storage tanks at the site.
2. Structural Measure
The proposal provides for the installation of twenty (20) 30,000 gallon
underground propane storage tanks and associated appurtenances as shown
on the mechanical plans furnished with this assessment.
The site encompasses an area which can be described as approximately
75 feet by 275 feet (0.47 acres) centrally located on a 17 acre tract
presently owned by Washington Natural Gas Company.
The project will entail the grading of approximately 4000 cubic yards of
native material to provide a level foundation for storage tanks. Any
unsuitable material not used at the site is to be hauled away and disposed
of in a manner consistent with jurisdictional regulations.
In order to prevent siltation of an existing small creek bordering the
work site, an existing 36" culvert will be extended beyond the limits of
the work prior to grading operations.
In addition to grading, approximately 6000 cubic yards of select fill
material will be brought to the site for bedding and backfilling the
storage tanks.
Above ground appurtenances connecting the tanks to process plant piping
will be similar in visual impact to those already existing on present
underground tanks adjacent to the proposed expansion.
3. Need and Justification for the Proposed Action
Peak shaving facilities are a necessary component of utility operations
in that they contribute to satisfy the need for adequate service at
reasonable cost to the consumer. Gas distribution system load is neces-
sarily temperature dependent. The demand for natural gas "peaks" during
a few of the coldest winter days. This peak can be described in terms
of maximum instaneous demand and duration of average demand when weather
is continuously cold.
Major gas transmission lines cannot economically be installed to handle
the relatively infrequent peaks for an indefinite time in the future,
hence the need for peak shaving facilities and their future expansion.
- 3 -
Further need for peak shaving ability can be caused by reductions in the
amount of gas available to the distribution company from its supplier.
Such is the case in the Pacific Northwest for the winter of 1974-1975.
Gas Company management was informed in summer of this year of a forth-
coming shortfall in gas delivered by Canadian suppliers for the coming
heating season. Studies by the Company indicate that existing facilities
are not adequate to provide for the increase in peak shaving duration
created by the supply shortfall.
It should be noted here that all winters are not alike and it is impossible
to predict the severity of the coming season; however, prudent utility
operation requires a high level of assurance that gas supply to highest
priority customers will not be affected. This priority includes the
residential home heating customers. The required degree of assurance
would be gained by an increase of the Renton peak shaving plant storage
by 40 , the subject of this assessment. No other alternate exists that
is economically feasible within the time framework. The Gas Company cites
the proposal as a matter of public convenience and necessity.
4. Location and Description of the Project Site
The project site is approximately one mile south of the Renton Central
Business District. The work site entails an area of approximately 0.47
acres centrally located within a 17 acre tract presently owned by the
Washington Natural Gas Company and used for an existing peak shaving
facility. The 17 acre tract is bounded on the east by Puget Drive, on
the west by 100 Avenue South and on the north and south by Puget Sound
Power and Light Company right-of-ways. Existing zoning is R-1, the plant
site having been held as "utility reserve", (provided in Section IV,
para. 3 of Zoning Ordinance No. 1472) since October 7, 1963.
5. Historical Background - Past Planning
Negotiations for the acquisition of the subject land began in 1963 with
Puget Properties and included meetings with the Renton Planning Commis-
sion. Plans for the utilities use of the land were put before the
Commission at this time so that developmentscould be undertaken within
the guidelines and requirements of local authorities. Subsequently, the
property was purchased with the understanding that development could be
accomplished within zoning regulations. Prior to this time, zoning was
residential with minimum lot sizes of 35,000 square feet, considered a
holding classification only. On September 25, 1963, the Renton Planning
Commission recommended rezoning to R-1, withholding the Utility Reserve
provision until actual plans could be provided for the development. The
City Council ratified the zoning change October 7, 1963. On July 22,
1964, the Planning Commission approved the site for the peak shaving plant.
B. Existing Conditions
1. Natural Setting
a. Area Involved
The area directly involved with the proposal is located in a sloping
valley and is bounded by a small drainage creek on the west and a
private access road on the east. The area was developed for the
purpose of a utility plant in 1964 at which time the native forest duff
- 4 -
was removed to permit landscaping within the context of the utility
use. The proposed tank site is presently in a hearty grass ground
cover. There exists approximately 20 small evergreen trees in a
cluster planted in 1964. Included among these are several Western
Cedars that existed prior to the earlier development.
b. Topography
The topography is sloping to the west and north and presents no
unusual difficulties to the proposed development.
c. Geology
The geology of the area is atypical of the area, the predominant soils
being of glacial origin with dense glacial till overlying compact sand-
stone bedrock. Above the dense till is found a more loose weathered
till underlying surface alluvial deposits. Soils engineering reports
designate this area as composed of Vashon till, a compact mixture of
silt, sand, gravel, and clay; as much as 150 feet thick but generally
less than 50 feet. The upper two to five feet is generally a loose,
silty sand and gravel.
d. Hydrology
The site, located on the slopes of a small drainage valley is subjected
to a considerable amount of surface runoff. On the east side of the
creek, where Puget Drive was constructed, 12 inch corrugated drainage
pipes feed water runoff from the road to the creek at a point down-
stream of the proposed work.
Maximum flows in the creek have not been offically tabulated; however,
engineering studies indicate a maximum stream flow of 30 CFS with
an increase in the future due to residential developments upstream
and a maximum future flow of 75 CFS is anticipated. Ground water
exists at depths varying between three and six feet during west seasons
due primarily to surface runoff. The slope of the ground surface and
the restriction to downward seepage of a very dense soil at a depth
of up to 13 feet keep the water levels high during the wet season.
c. Manmade Features
The 17 acre tract is presently occupied by a peak shaving facility
composed of many parts:
1. A compressor building
2. An existing underground tank farm
3. An above ground coolant storage tank
4. Various heat exchangers, pumps, and motors
5. Two large hot water bath heaters
6. Interconnecting piping
In addition to the mechanical features on the site, a great deal of
landscaping has been completed consisting in the main of evergreen
trees which effectively screen the plant from adjacent public right-
- 5 -
of-ways.
2. Human Use
Since the establishment of the 17 acre tract in a "utility reserve" status
over ten years ago the property has been generally closed to public access.
As seen from its periphery the area appears as a rural wooded ravine.
As such, the area is a greenbelt shielding the various adjacent land uses
from each other. High density multi-family uses border the property on
the east and rather rural residential areas border the west. The north
and south boundaries are characterized by other utilities right-of-ways.
No significant socio-economic change can be foreseen in the area due to
the proposed addition to the peak shaving plant.
The site has no known significance as an archeological or historic site.
C. Environmental Impact of the Proposed Action
1. Topography
Although the actual work site is comparatively small, a significant
amount:`of grading and filling is required; 4000 cubic yards and 6000
yards respectively. The topography will be altered to some extent;
however, the visual impact will remain essentially the same even to
those within the reserve apd no change will be noticeable from out-
side the reserve boundaries.
2. Vegetation
Existing grasses presently maintained on the site will of course be
lost. They will be replaced in the final restoration. Of greater
significance is a cluster of evergreen trees located directly on the
work site. The majority of these will be relocated per the landscaping
and rehabilitation plan. Three of these are medium size (14" trunk)
western red cedar (Thuja Plicata) which will be lost. These have value
and can be made available to civic groups for purposes such as totem
poles.
No other significant impact to "Vegetation is foreseen.
3. Soils, Drainage, and Stability
The engineering soils and foundation report indicate no significant
soil, -drainage, or stability problems will be encountered.
4. Biological Impacts
No significant biological impacts can be foreseen by the proposed action.
5. Safety
The proposed action involves adding approximately 540,000 gallons of
propane storage to an existing storage of 900,000 gallons. The size of
the proposed containers is smaller than nine of the existing containers.
- 6 -
Safety considerations relate to container size and loss of container
integrity. The proposed installation does not increase the hazard
factor.
As a utility plant, the facility falls under the codes of the DOT,
Office of Pipeline Safety, and under the Uniform Fire Code, incorpora-
ting NFPA 58 and 59. As such, the installation meets the most stringent
requirements for safety developed in this country. Safety features in-
clude but are not limited to: e
a. Underground, coated and cathodically protected storage tanks construc-
ted to ASME pressure vessel codes.
b. All tank connections protected with automatic excess flow check valves.
c. Normal status of the plant is standby, with operation occurring in-
frequently during severed.cold. Operation is on a fully manned basis
and not remotely controlled.
d. Roving security patrols on a confidential schedule.
e. Availability of radio equipped Company personnel in the general area
24 hours per day.
f. Six inch fire water main at the site, in addition to chemical fire
fighting equipment.
g. Large buffering area with set backs in excess of Code Requirements.
Code requirements take into consideration the loss of tank integrity
and require safety setbacks according to container size and installa-
tion methods. The required setback for size and installation of the
proposed containers is not less than 50 feet from the nearest im-
portant building or line of adjacent property which may be built upon.
The nearest line of adjacent property which may be built upon is a
distance of 210 feet or over four times the code requirement.
The nearest important building is the on-site compressor house which
is a distance of 120 feet or over two times the code requirement.
h. A responsible utility owner-operator.
6. Air and Odor Pollution
No significant air pollution is possible by the proposed action.
The existing plant, when operated, discharges the products of combustion
from natural gas engines and heaters to the atmosphere. These are carbon
dioxide and water, natural gas being well known as a clean fuel.
- 7
UJ
No propane gas is released to the atmosphere at the plant although it too
is well known as a non-toxic substance but has a distinctive odor inten-
tionally added as a detector. Although the plant is odor free, the
Company operates another station nearby that has caused odor complaints
in the area. This other facility is being redesigned with more modern
equipment to alleviate the odor problems.
7. Water Pollution
There is expected to be a small and temporary decline in drainage water
quality due to construction activities. This will be minimized by the
culvert installation and careful methods.
8. Noise
There will be temporary increase in noise due to construction activities.
No unusual construction equipment will be necessary here and the excellent
natural growth on buffering areas can be expected to limit off-site
noises to well below average levels for this type of construction.
9. Construction
Construction impacts will be minimal. Off-site considerations include
the movement of trucks and machinery on public roads.
A below average noise impact is expected due to distance to site
boundaries and buffering vegetation.
No off-site visual impact will be significant due to existing topography
and screening.
D. Mitigating Measures
Due to the minimal impacts expected, mitigating measures to further diminish
impacts are of a simple nature.
The engineer will reserve the right to approve construction methods whenever
deemed necessary to mitigate impacts.
The routing of trucks and machinery to the site willbbe designed to avoid
residential feeder streets.
Transplanting of trees affedted by the action is best accomplished in late
fall; this time of year fits the construction schedule well.
E. Alternatives
There is no known alternative to this action that is feasible within the time
framework.
Without the increased storage the Company will be in the position of providing
for the possibility of trucking large quantities of propane to the site under
adverse weather conditions.
_ g _
This possibility is at best insufficient, as truck unloading time is
greater than plant output capacity. At worst, the transporting and
handling of these quantities in adverse weather conditions constitute
an increased hazard factor.
•
I:
• WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS COMPANY j .
•
815 Mercer Street (P.O. Box 1869) Seattle, Washington 98111 . Telephone (206) 622-6767
•
September 6, 1974
Renton Planning Commission
City Hall
Renton, Washington 98055 ,
• PROPOSAL TO INCREASE STORAGE CAPACITY
DAVID W. SWA1R STATION, RENTON, WASHINGTON
Washington Natural Gas Company has made application for approval
of an addition to ti:e South Seattle Peak Shaving Plant located in Section
29, Township 23, Raago 5E, WM City of Renton, Washington. The proposal
• - calls for an addition to an existing peak shaving plant which is an inte-
gtal part of the supply of natural gas to cne Renton South Seattle area.
The original permit was approved by the Renton Planning Commission in July
of 1964. Subsequently, the plant was Luilt and has been in existence and
has operated periodically during extremely cold weather.
The current natural gas supply situation requires that Washington
Natural Gas Company add to its peak shaving storage capacity; the proposal
calls for an additional 4077,. Swarr SLation now h2s storage capacity to
. -operate for 22 days at full capacity. The addition will provide another
day of operation. Our forecast shows that under design conditions this add-
ition is required to insure adequate supplies for our residential and commer-
cial customers. Since our decision to add this facility was made and approved
• by our Board of Directors, the Federal Energy Authority has requested that
utilities add to their energy storage facilities.
•
.. .
óóëars! •
\ SERVING PUGET SOUND COUNTRY SINCE 1873
o -
CIF �fy
2 THE CITY OF RENTON
n a MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
AVERYGARRETT, MAYOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT
/30,P�T �Ot�Q' 235 -'2550
FO SEPS�
MEMORANDUM
November 15, 1974
TO: Del Mead, City Clerk
FROM: Joan Lankford
Planning Department
RE: Landscape .Installation and Maintenance
Bonds for Washington Natural Gas Company
We are forwarding the two landscape performance bonds ,
#U792970 and #U792974 from Washington Natural Gas Company
for installation of landscape and three-year maintenance at
the Swarr Station located west of Puget Drive.
The landscape plan will be submitted to the Planning
Department in the near future, and will be on file in our
department.
If you have any questions, or need any additional
information, please contact us.
Attachments
JAL:ms
WASH I N GTO N NATURAL GAS COMPANY
815 Mercer Street (P.O. Box 1869) Seattle, Washington 98111 Telephone (206) 622-6767
November 5, 1974
Ms. Joan A. Lankford
Assistant Planner, Landscape Design
City of Renton Planning Department
Municipal Building
Renton, Washington 98055
Dear Ms. Lankford:
Enclosed are two performance bonds to cover installation and
maintenance of the proposed landscaping at our Swarr Station. The amounts
are 150% of estimated cost as required by our Site Plan Approval.
A third party estimate for topsoil, reseeding and trees is
attached. The estimate for maintenance is our own and is based on an average
one man-day per month for watering, mowing, spraying, etc.
We have not finalized our landscaping plans as yet and realize
that the drawings numbered 2D-837, on file with your office, indicates
only in general the final plan.
Next week all of the tanks will be in place and the final
contours will begin to take shape. We would appreciate your help in final-
izing the landscape plan and would like to meet with you at the site.
We will contact you in a few days, but if you have any questions,
please call.
Sincerely,
---FCC:41(
Tony Tessitore
Eastern Division Engineer
enclosures
Hof RF/;c; PECFNEo
Nov 6 i 7
lOOYears! � , •
SERVING PUGET SOUND COUNTRY SINCE 1873 A. DE?
•
MID-' OUNT IN CONTRACTORS, iNC.
OIL AND GAS PIPELINES - PROCESS PIPING - PIPE FABRICATION •
P. 0. BOX 577 (206) 455-7600
- 1200-112TH N. E. - SUITE 143
BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98009
•
PIPE FAB SHOP WAREHOUSE
1401 - 130TH AVE. N.E. 1401 - 130TH AVE. N.E.
(206) 455-7620 (206) 455-7610
October 22, 1974
•
Washington Natural Gas Company
P, 0; Box 1869
• Seattle, Washington. 98111 .
Attention: Mr. Tony Tessitore
Gentlemen:
We have reviewed the proposed landscaping Lo be performed at
r
y.JUl Jw;-,tiYY S..u:..i lii. in l )riiiG'..t.L l7ii 1ti't Lit 'WIC: .a.11J Ld.t lcLl.1Un of ad-
ditional propane storage. We estimate that this landscaping
' can be accomplished for $11,500,00 plus Washington State Sales
. Tax. In this price the reuse of those trees which can be saved
is contemplated, along with the purchase and installation of
• 4' to 5 ' nursery-size trees, as required.
•
• If you need additional information, please feel free to call.
• Very truly yours,
1 -
' % • ,2
.--,,,`.• •-i -Cf.y.;i,.2.e.:•(.2,7.
•
H. Stubbs
• • Vice President •.
JHS/sr -
ECEi\I •
Y
NOV 6 ?,Sl ti•
�9------..-.-.Y..w----.1.
Ct`
2���G DEP PRE
• Bond No. U792970
PERFORMANCE BOND
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That we, WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS COMPANY, as
Principal, and UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized and
existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Washington and Surety,
are held and firmly bound unto the City of Renton, State of Washington, in the
sum of SEVENTEEN THOUSAND-TWO HUNDRED FIFTY AND NO/100 Dollars ($17,250) lawful
money of the United States of America, for payment of which, well and truly, to
be made, we hereby bind ourselves and our heirs, executors and administrators,
and each of our successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these
presents.
The conditions of this obligation are those arising pursuant to a Site Plan
Approval and Special Permit for fill and grading, the subject applications being
approved after a Public Hearing of the City of Renton Planning Commission on
October 9, 1974 and in connection with the approvals the Principal shall:
1. Provide additional buffering in the form of trees along the west
property line according to landscaping plans 2D-837, on file with
the City of Renton and subject to its approval.
2. Provide top soil and reseeding of an area of 3335 square yards
which is to be excavated and filled over new propane storage tanks
as shown on plans 2D-837.
3. Replant or replace 22 evergreen trees five to seven feet in height
to provide screening along the in-plant access road as shown on
plans 2D-837.
4. Provde errosion control on bank above said access road.
NOW, THEREFORE, if the above-named Principal shall complete the above requirements
to the approval of the City of Renton Planning Director, then this obligation shall
be void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. If the Principal fails to
complete the above requirements, the surety here try-guarantees their performance.
In the event the above requirements are not complied with by either the Principal
or surety, the bond shall be forfeited to the City of Renton, and the Principal '
hereby grants unto the City of Renton, the right of entry to this property in order
to fulfill these conditions.
Signed, sealed and delivered this 3RD day of NOVEMBER , 174 .
WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS COMPANY
By ( 9 .41.
UNITED PAC IC INSURA OMP
BY �� �� sW✓
"THEO . BACKMANN
ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
Countersigned:
LaBOW, HAYNES COMPANY, INCORPORATED
By
Resident Agent, Seattle, Washington
/ (T1q;Elifl%
`,9�•bin.
NG 1100).>P��.�
' • Bond No. U792974-
PERFORMANCE BOND
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That we, WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS COMPANY, as
Principal, and UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized and
existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Washington and Surety,
are held and firmly bound unto the City of Renton, State of Washington, in the
sum of THIRTY-SIX HUNDRED AND NO/100 Dollars. ($3,600) lawful money of the United
States of America, for payment of which, well and truly, to be made, we hereby
bind ourselves and our heirs, executors and administrators, and each of our suc-
cessors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.
The conditions of this obligation are those arising pursuant to a Site Plan
Approval and Special Permit for fill and grading, the subject applications being
approved after a Public Hearing of the City of Renton Planning Commission on
October 9, 1974, and in connection with the approvals the Principal shall:
Provide maintenance on the following landscaping for a period of three
years:
1. Buffering in the form of trees along the west property line according
to landscaping plans 2D-837, on file with the City of Renton and sub-
ject to its approval.
2. Top soil and reseeding of an area of 3335 square yards which is to be
excavated and filled over new propane storage tanks as shown on plans
2D-837.
3. Twenty-two evergreen trees five to seven feet in height to provide
screening along the in-plant access road as shown on plans 2D-837.
4. Errosion control on bank above said access road.
NOW, THEREFORE, if the above-named principal shall complete the above requirements
to the approval of the City of Renton Planning Director, then this obligation shall
be void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. If the principal fails to
complete the above requirements, the surety hereby guarantees their performance.
In the event the above requirements are not complied with by either the principal
or surety, the bond shall be forfeited to the City of Renton, and the principal
hereby grants unto the City of Renton, the right of entry to this property in order
to fulfill these conditions.
Signed, sealed and delivered this 3RD day of NOVEMBER , 19 74
WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS COMPANY
By (()) .4�
UNITED PAC FIC-INSURANC COMPA
THEO W. BACKMANN
Countersigned• ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
La BOW, HAYNES•COMPANY, INCORPORATED
y C �
Resident Agent, $eattle, Washington
rREjls
alb o�
Nov 6 -Ti4
•
. g • 1fcruRL GAS
S �?O
r/ CITY OF RENTON
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT
i
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY v.c ',. //
File No . SP- 719.- Fee $25 . 00 •
Date Rec' d 9.. ,f_ %1 Receipt No .
APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 :
1. Name Washington Natural Gas Company Phone 622-6767
Address 815 Mercer Street. Seattle. Washington -
2. Property location 100 Avenue SE & SE 160 Street
3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary)
Additional sheet attached
4. Number of acres or sq. ft. 17.01 Present zoning single family
5. What do you propose to develop on this property? To grade approximately
4000 C.Y. of native material and to fill approximatdy 6000 C.Y. to accomodate
tank installation at peak shaving plant.
6. The following information shall be submitted with this application :
Scale
A. Site and access plan (include setbacks ,
existing structures , easements , and other
factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20 ' attached
B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan . . 1" = 10 ' attached
C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning
on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ' - 800 ' attached
D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) No new building proposed
E . A special permit required by the Renton Mining, Excavation
and Grading Ordinance shall submit the information listed in
Section 4-2307. 5 in addition to the above .
attached
7. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
Date approved 16 -9-7 /
Date denied
Date appealed
Appeal action
Remarks Sa.1 e 71 "10 gB„ ✓, i'o 6-
Planning Dept .
2-73
' revised 1/74
•
•
•
AFFIDAVIT
•
I, l.�.obezt lti. Gulliver , being duly sworn, declare that I
am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the
foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information
herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of ,
my knowledge and belief.
Subscribed and, sworn before me
this 4e1 day of September , 19 7: ,
Notary Public in and for the State of
Washington, residing at Dockton
41,02/e:(: 194 afi
(Name of Notar lic) (Sig
re of Owner
)
Washington Natural Gas Company
P O. Box 262, Dockt on„ 1l77 2 shingto 815 egce$ Stree
(Address) (Address)
Seattle ia,sh. 98109
(City) (State)
•
622-6767
(Telephone)
• (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY)
•
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that the• foregoing application has been' inspected by me
and has been foun orough and complete in every particular and to
conform to the 1 a ..4i ulations of the Renton Planning Department
governing the k
i ¢^4Csuc pplication .
HLJ_ [LLJ
Date Receive SEP 4 E9T4 ! , 19 By:
�'�C' DEPP� Renton Planning Dept .
1 2-7.3
\
/ ‘
`
• v r.ir .71 'r.
c.
, •I
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT WORKSHEET
•
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY :
Application No . "w --77-75/' ` Negative Dec .
Date Received 7/ EIS
INSTRUCTIONS : The purpose of this information is to assist the vari -
ous departments of the .City to determine whether an environmental
impact statement will be required before approving and issuing a per-
mit for a proposed project. Single family residential uses in non
sensitive areas are exempt from this requirement as established by
Washington Administrative Code 173-34.
In addition to the following information , please submit a vicinity map
(recommend scale : 1" representing 200 ' to 800' ) and a site map (rec-
ommended scale : 1" representing 10 ' to 40 ' ) .
APPLICANT TO PROVIDE INFORMATION REQUIRED IN ITEMS 1 THROUGH 30 BELOW:
1 . Name of applicant Washington Natural Gas Company
2 . Mailing address 815 Mercer Street, Seattle. Washington (PO Box 1869, Seattle)
Telephone 622-6767
3. Applicant is :
FlOwner
EILesSee
71Contract purchaser
Q0ther (specify)
4. Name and address of owner , if other than applicant : '
Telephone
5 . General location of proposed project (give street. address if any
or nearest street and intersection
100 Avenue, SE & SE 160 Street
- 2
6 . Legal description (if lengthy , attach as separate sheet)
Attached
7 . Area 17.01 acres Dimensions irregular, see plot plan
8. Intended use of property or project ( include details : number of
units , volume , etc. ) :
The intended use is a peak shaving plant. This plant now exists under
authority of the Renton Planning Commission approval of July 22, 1969.
9. Generally describe the property and existing improvements :
Wooded and landscaped property screened from view with existing peak
shaving plant on premises.
10. Total construction cost. or fair market value of proposed project
including additional developments contemplated :
approximately $850,000
11 . Construction dates (month and year) for which permit is requested :
Begin Septecpber, 1974 End January, 1975.
- 3 -
12 . List any other permits for this project from state , federal , o.r
other local governmental agencies for which you have applied or .
will apply, including the name of the issuing agency, whether the
permit has been applied for, and if so , the date of the applica-
tion , whether the application was approved or denied and the date
of same , and the number of the application or permit : , none
Date
Agency Permit Type Submitted* Number Status**
•
* Leave blank if not submitted . . '
** Approved , denied or pending .
13 . Has an Environmental Impact Statement or an Environmental Assess-
ment been prepared for 'the.. proposed . project.?
1 yes x no If "yes " submit copy with this
environmental impact worksheet .
14. Are there similar projects , both public and private , existing or
planned in the immediate area :
I ' yes no don ' t know If, "yes" explain .
15 . Is the proposed project located in or adjacent to an area or '
structure having unique or exceptional historic , '.cultural -, or
other values . consi.dere.d impo-rtant-. by some sectors of the popu-
lation?
yes .. fl4no , . , . If "yes" explain .
16 . Is the' proposed project located in an area that may be considered
sensitive and is subject to _erosion , landslides , ..floods , ,etc . ? '
yes . 1 g! no Ifj "yes" explain .
•
- 4 -
17 . Is the proposed project located in an area that has a number of
large trees or other natural landscaped areas , waterways , marshes
or, wildlife?
x yes I ' no If "yes" explain .
The property is landscaped with many trees, small wildlife is evident
and is compatible with plant usage.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF PROPOSED PROJECT : In the following questions
summarize what the applicant feels will be the environmental impact ,
both beneficial and adverse , of the proposed project. Consideration
should be given to both the human and natural environmental as well
as physical , social , and aesthetic aspect. For projects which are
part of a more extensive plan , consider the implications of the entire
plan and not just the project now being proposed .
18. Land Use : Will the project have a significant effect on land
use in the surrounding area?
1-1 yes J Jno Explain :
The project is an addition of underground storage to an existing plant.
No change in plant use or effect will result.
19 . Project Design and Appearance : Will the project design , appear-
ance , landscaping , etc. , assure the maximum protection for the
natural environment?
jjyes Lino Explain :
The project is designed to increase storage capacity by undergrounding the
tanks. Revised contours will be landscaped to conform to the aesthetic impact
of the existing areas.
20. Ground Contours : Does the proposed project have an effect on
the existing ground contours of the project location?
Ix lyes rino . Is the project likely to cause erosion
or sedimentation? F-1 yes x no? If "yes" to either , explain .
Final contours will revised from natural to a realitively minor extent.
Adequate subsurface and surface drainage is designed and all affected areas
are to be planted to control erosion. Work methods will be designed to
minimize erosion or sedimentation during construction.
- 5 -
21 . Air Quality: Will construction of the project and use of the
completed project have a substantial effect on the existing air
quality? (Consider the effect of any gas , chemicals , smoke ,
dust , particulate matter , and odors ) ?
yes I�no If "yes " explain .
22 . Water Quality : Will construction 'of the project and use of the
completed project be likely to have an effect 'on the existing
water quality of, the area? (Consider the adequacy of drainage
and runoff and the likely endpoint of any liquids draining from
the project. ) [ , yes [ no . Is there a good possibility
that this project will requir� an expansion of local water and/or
sewer facilities? Ij yes X no
If "yes" to either , explain .
23 . Noise : Will construction of the project or use of the completed
project significantly affect the existing noise levels of the
area? [-dyes allno . Will the project be affected by airports ,
freeways , railroads or other sources of noise?
Ayes r ino If "yes". to either , explain .
24. Population Density : Will a noticeable population change result.
from this project? (Consider the present density per acre in
the surrounding community to the proposed density of the project
and including daytime density. ) r ! yes al no . Will the pro-
ject cause periodic or temporary fluctuations in population due
to tourism , employment , shopping , schools , etc . j__[yes JJno .
If "yes" to either , explain .
• - 6 -
25 . Effect on Population : Will the proposed action directly or in-
directly cause the relocation of a sizeable number of persons or
the division or disruption .of existing community patterns of liv-
ing? Flyes al no If "yes" explain .
•
26 . Schools and Parks : Will the proposed project have an effect on
schools and parks in the area?
Ayes [] no If "yes" explain .
27 . Transportation : Will construction of the project or use of the
completed project have a significant impact on transportation in
the area? t-
_Jyes Ix 1no
Explain :
28. Public Use : Will the project be available for use by all sectors
of the public?,
Ayes [x ' no •
Explain :
Peak shaving plant is not intended to be available for any 'publicuse.
•
29 . Other impacts : Identify any other beneficial or adverse environ-
mental impacts which may result from the construction or comple-
tion of the proposed, project.
none
•
- 7
30 . VIEWS OF LOCAL GROUPS :
Have you made your plans known to interested community roups
or neighbors in the vicinity of the project? Ayes (x lino
If "yes" what are their reactions?
If "no" do you intend to contact these people?[xl yes [Jno
Interested persons will have the opportunity to review our plans during
the normal permit aquisition phase.
•
CERTIFICATION BY OWNER/REPRESENTATIVE
The Owner/Representative identified in Item No . 1 or 4 above hereby
certifies that the information furnished in this Environmental Work-
sheet is true and accurate to the best of their knowledge .
7;7A-1 z � L�r vkc /VA-0 er[e-. )t _7eate /�/ 7
Signature Title
- 8
TO BE 'FILLED IN BY CITY D'EpARTMENTS
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department: z �
Comments :.
Signa re of Director or Authorized Representative Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department:
Comments :
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
- 9 -
REVIEW al(' OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department:'
Comments :
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : '
Comments :
•
•
Signature of Director or Authorized• Representative Date
- 10
ACTION BY RESPONSIBLE OFFrCIAL
A. Staff review determined that project:
Has no significant environmental impact and application
should be processed without further consideration of
environmental effects .
May have significant environmental impact and a complete
environmental assessment should be prepared by applicant
prio.r to further action on request for permit.
B. Reasons for above conclusion :
Signature of Responsible Official or Authorized Representative
Date : Form: EIS-1
Planning Department
October 15 , 1973
•
•yl
•
PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE ROUTED
PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR;
REZONE • MAJOR PLAT , •
SITE APPROVAL • SHORT HAT • .
4 :9314P ori# 1466401° SrAS, WAIVER • ,
Grit.A.4 Bic •
•
SHORELINE MANACEMLT. 7
PERMIT OR EXEMPTION ' . . •
• - AND RETURN.TO TILE PLANNING -DEPARTMENT .7 /
WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE, BEFORE • •
•
SIGNATURE • ' •OR
INITIAL • DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DENIAL DATE .. . ,
• I3UILDIC • * ' 9"./lig... '79 •
. • " --iRAFFIC
-af 4230 7y" - •
•
•
401". xx
- . - ,- • .
HEALTH . • •
•
•
• " "
REVIEWER TS COMMENTS OR APPROVAL, CCAIDITIONS: •
• SPOC . Pcii.mxr • •
Al . r)
cou- :re TA" C4:24)
X . - o .4. s - o .„%-• Cy/Veit-7
,9CC&S Raw eye iednos 4 07' zif9c1(- 0 By •
Piise‘e . erne,: meeS r .0v s ••• • . ,.•
k914 1<YA3 •
. •
•
•
•
.NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION
• RENTON , WASHINGTON
A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION AT ITS
REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON ,
ON OCTOBER 9 , 1974 , AT 8 : 00 P . M . TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING
PETITIONS :
1 . SITE (USE ) APPROVAL TO ALLOW EXPANSION OF EXISTING
GAS STORAGE PLANT IN R-1 ZONE ; file No . SA-790-74 ;
property locxated between S . Puget Dr . and Williams
Ave . S . Legal description on file in Planning
Department office .
2 . SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW EXCAVATION AND GRADING IN
R-1 ZONE ; file No . SP-789-74 ; property located
between S . Puget Dr. and Williams Ave . S . Legal
description on file in Planning Department office .
•
•
•
ALL PERSONS INTERESTED OR OBJECTING TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE
PRESENT AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ON ` OCTOBER 9 , 1974 ,
AT 8 : 00 P . M . TO VOICE THEIR PROTESTS OR OBJECTIONS TO SAME .
LARRY GIBSON , SECRETARY
. PUBLISHED OCTOBER 4, 1974 RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION
. CERTIFICATION
I , MICHAEL L . SMITH , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE
DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY
.DESCRIBED ABOVE AS RRESCRIBED BY LAW .
ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn
to before me , a Notary Public , SIGNED
on th /.delay of
1 9 .
NOTICE 01= PUBLIC F":Aft 1 Nh
RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION
RENTON , WASHINGTON -
A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION AT ITS
REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON ,
ON SEPTEMBER 25 , 1974 , AT 8 : 00 P . M . TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING :
1 . REVISION OF THE CITY"S COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN AS IT
PERTAINS TO
a . AREA IN VICINITY OF THE HOSPITAL REGION .
b . AN APPLICATION FOR COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN
AMENDMENT . Request of W. Stewart Pope for property
located. at 3713 Talbot Road S . consisting of 8. 2
acres of land at the southwest intersection of
Talbot Road and South 37th St . to amend the Compre-
hensive Land Use Plan from single family residential
to public and quasi public use .
2 . PETITIONS AS FOLLOWS :
a . SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW FILLING AND GRADING IN G ZONE ,
file No . SP-763-74 ; property located at Black River
Junction . Legal description on file in Planning Depart-
ment office .
b. APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL IN R-2
zone , file No . PP-789-74; property located on
N . E . 8th ST . between Harrington and Jefferson Ave . N . E .
Legal description on file in Planning Department office .
c . REZONE FROM G TO R-2 ; file No . R-787-74 ; property
located on Park Ave . N . between N . 30th St. and
N . 32nd St. Legal description on file in Planning
Department office .
d . SPECIAL PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT 10-UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING
IN G ( R-2 ) ZONE ; file No . SP-788-74 ; property located
on Park Ave. N . between N . 30th St . and N . 32nd St.
Legal description on file in Planning Department office .
i( e . SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW FILLING AND GRADING IN R-1
ZONE ; file No . SP-789-74 ; property located between
S . Puget Dr . and Williams Ave . S . Legal description
on file in Planning Department office .
f. SITE APPROVAL TO ADD STORAGE CAPACITY TO EXISTING
PEAK SHAVING PLANT IN THE FORM OF TWENTY 30 ,000 GALLON
UNDERGROUND PROPANE TANKS IN R-1 ZONE ; file No .
SA-790-74 ; property located between S . Puget Dr. and
Williams Ave . S . Legal description on file in Planning
Department office .
ALL PERSONS INTERESTED. OR OBJECTING TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED
TO BE PRESENT AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ON SEPTEMBER 2.5 ,
1974 , AT 8 : 00 P . M. TO VOICE THEIR PROTESTS OR OBJECTIONS TO SAME .
PUBLISHED September 15 , 1974 LARRY GIBSON , SECRETARY
RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION
CERTIFICATION
I , , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE
ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE
PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW .
ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn
to before me , a Notary Public , • / / . ,
on the /a d' day of, , � „� 1% SIGNED _
197/ .
/277 --G:yLG >2ZZ-C.-7`-4—
1 `
7y
APPLICATION: SPECIAL PERMIT - FOR EXCAVATION AND GRADING
APPLICANT: WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS COMPANY
LOCATION : Property located between South Puget Drive
and. Williams Avenue South in the vicinity
of South 19th Street.
ZONING : R- 1
REQUEST: Applicant requests Planning Commission approval
for excavation and fill related to a proposal
to increase propane storage capacity at the
existing peak shaving plant.
COMMENTS : 1 . The project will entail 4 ,000 cubic yards
of cut to provide a level foundation for
the storage tanks and approximately 6 ,000
cubic yards of additional fill to bury the
tanks . The depth will be approximately
14 feet . Total area disturbed = ± 30 ,000
square feet.
2 . An existing stream is to be culverted an
additional ± 330 feet with 36" pipe .
Purpose is to allow free movement of the
stream, reduce possibilities of erosion
and subsidence and decrease siltation .
3 . A group 'of existing trees will be removed
and al) replanted for screening (except
the larger Cedar trees ) .
4. Disturbed area will be replanted in grass
and evergreen trees . '
5 . Hillside above access road should be
reseeded to prevent erosion .
STAFF
RECOMMENDA— Recommend continuance for additional input
TION : for the Environmental Assessment. Areas of
concern are erosion , drainage , and landscaping .
THE CITY OF RENTON
z o MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
n o�
0
AVERY GARRETT, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
4
0,PAT 2 3 5 - 2 5 5 0
��
fD SEP•-
MEMORANDUM
•
November 15, 1974
' TO: Del Mead, City Clerk
FROM: Joan Lankford
Planning Department
RE: Landscape ,Installation and Maintenance -
Bonds for Washington Natural Gas Company
We are forwarding the two landscape performance bonds,
#U792970 and #U792974 from Washington Natural Gas Company
for installation of landscape and three-year. maintenance at
the Swarr Station located west of Puget Drive.
The landscape plan will be submitted to the Planning
Department in the near future, and will be on file in our
department.
If you have any questions, or need any additional
information, please contact us.
Attachments
JAL:ms
•
•
WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS COMPANY
813 ,tlrr(yr .heel (P.O. Box I '6')) .tie'rril/r, llrec/rn 'R,rr ')'11I Ir/e•fi/,(m (_O(,) (,"-n"(,'
November 5, 1974
Ms. Joan A. Lankford
Assistant Planner, Landscape Design
City of Renton Planning Department
Municipal Building
Renton, Washington 98055
Dear Ms. Lankford :
Enclosed are two performance bonds to cover installation and
maintenance of the proposed landscaping at our Swarr Station. The amounts
are 1507 of estimated cost as required by our Site Plan Approval.
A third party estimate for topsoil, reseeding and trees is
attached. The estimate for maintenance is our own and is based on an average '
one man-day per month for watering, mowing, spraying, etc.
We have not finalized our landscaping plans as yet and realize
that the drawings numbered 2D-837, on file with your office, indicates
only in general the final plan.
Next week all of the tanks will be in place and the final
contours will begin to take shape. We would appreciate your help in final-
izing the landscape plan and would like to meet with you at the site.
We will contact you in a few days, but if you have any questions,
please call.
Sincerely,
�Vr I
Tony Tessitore
Eastern Division Engineer
enclosures
PFCFr\IEo 2
Nov
lOOYears! ,+
SERVING PUGET SOUND COUNTRY SINCE 1873 LNG DEPt`‘-‘
•
•
• MID-MOUNTAIN CONTRACTORS, INC.
OIL AND GAS PIPELINES - PROCESS PIPING - PIPE FABRICATION
P. O. BOX 577 (206) 455-7600
1200-112TH N. E. - SUITE 142
'1 BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98009
PIPE FAB SHOP • . WAREHOUSE
1401 - 130TH AVE. N.E. 1401 - 130TH AVE. 14.E.
1206) 455-71,20 (20u1 46>-7610
October 22, 1974
•
Washington Natural Gas Company
P. O. Box 1869 .
Seattle, Washingtoi: 98111
Attention: Mr. Tony Tessitore
•
Gentlemen: , .
We have reviewed tl:e proposed landscaping Lo be performed at. ,
j ..u1 S.;.11:1 SLdtlo- in l.vli.leLLluI& )ILll Lh ilista, l.lLlull uI ad-
ditional propane storage. We estimatc that this landscaping
can be accomplished for $11,500.00 plus Washington State Sales
Tax. In this price the reuse of those trees which can be saved
is contemplated, along with the purchase and installation of
4 ' to 5 ° nursery-size trees, as required.
If you need additional information, please feel free to call .
•
. Very truly yours,
1 c� '" 9 %l
z. Cam_/ 7 yLe'4 J
•
(. H. Stubbsh: •
. '-" Vice President
JIIS/sr
OF RF
�� PECEIII�Eo"'o,Cd
.
•
NI CAA r) _. ;7
ti- G DEED
Bond No. U792970
PERFORMANCE BOND
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That we, WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS COMPANY, as
Principal, and UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized and
existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Washington and Surety,
are held and firmly bound unto the City of Renton, State of Washington, in the
sum of SEVENTEEN THOUSAND-TWO HUNDRED FIFTY AND NO/100 Dollars ($17,250) lawful
money of the United States of America, for payment of which, well and truly, to
be made, we hereby bind ourselves and our heirs, executors and administrators,
and each of our successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these
presents.
The conditions of this obligation are those arising pursuant to a Site Plan
Approval and Special Permit for fill and grading, the subject applications being
approved after a Public Hearing of the City of Renton Planning Commission on
October 9, 1974 and in connection with the approvals the Principal shall:
1. Provide additional buffering in the form of trees along the west
property line according to landscaping plans 2D-837, on file with
the City of,Renton and subject to its approval.
2. Provide top soil and reseeding of an area of 3335 square yards
which is to be excavated and filled over new propane storage tanks
as shown on plans 2D-837.
3. Replant or replace 22 evergreen trees five to seven feet in height
to provide screening along the in-plant access road as shown on
plans 2D-837.
4. Provde errosion control on bank above said access road.
NOW, THEREFORE, if the above-named Principal shall complete the above requirements
to the approval of the City of Renton Planning Director, then this obligation shall
be void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. If the Principal fails to
complete the above requirements, the surety hereby-guarantees their performance.
In the event the above requirements are not complied with by either the Principal
or surety, the bond shall be forfeited to the City of Renton, and the Principal
hereby grants unto the City of Renton, the right of entry to this property in order
to fulfill these conditions.
Signed, sealed and delivered this 3RD day of NOVEMBER , 174 .
WASHINGTON( NATURAL GAS COMPANY
By ( /. t 2v:41g
UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE--cOMPA1 Y'
"THEO W. BACKMANN
ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
Countersigned:
LaBOW, HAYNES COMPANY, INCORPORATED
By . • _ , ...
Resident Agent, Seattle, Washington
OF R
cgla
•=-'\
o
Bond No. U792974-
• PERFORMANCE BOND
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That we, WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS COMPANY, as
Principal, and UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized and
existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Washington and Surety,
are held and firmly bound unto the City of Renton, State of Washington, in the
sum of THIRTY-SIX HUNDRED AND NO/100 Dollars ($3,600) lawful money of the United
States of America, for payment of which, well and truly, to be made, we hereby
bind ourselves and our heirs, executors and administrators, and each of our suc-
cessors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.
The conditions of this obligation are those arising pursuant to a Site Plan
Approval and Special• Permit for fill and grading, the subject applications being
approved after a Public Hearing of the City of Renton Planning Commission on
October 9, 1974,- and in connection with the approvals the Principal shall:
Provide maintenance on the following landscaping for a period of three
years :
1. Buffering in the form of trees along the west property line according
to landscaping plans 2D-837, on file with the City of Renton and sub-
ject to its approval.
2. Top soil and reseeding of an area of 3335 square yards which is to be
excavated and filled over new propane storage tanks as shown on plans
2D-837.
3. Twenty-two evergreen trees five to seven feet in height to provide
screening along the in-plant access road as shown on plans 2D-837.
4. Errosion control on bank above said access road.
NOW, THEREFORE, if the above-named principal shall complete the above requirements
to the approval of the City of Renton Planning Director, then this obligation shall
be void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. If the principal fails to
complete the above 'requirements, the surety hereby guarantees their performance.
In the event the above requirements are not complied with by either the principal
or surety, the bond shall be forfeited to the City of Renton, and the principal
hereby grants unto the City of Renton, the right of entry to this property in order
to fulfill these conditions.
Signed, sealed and delivered this 3RD day of NOVEMBER , 19 74 .
WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS COMPANY
BY (rti/
UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY
" i
THEO W. BACKMANN
Countersigned: ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
LaBOW, HAYNES COMPANY, INCORPORATED
•
/ .
Resident Agent, Seattle, Washington
alE0 C)\\
----------.W-------..
7
\�N� D03./
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
OCTOBER 10, 1974
NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
APPLICATION: SITE PLAN APPROVAL SA-790-74 FOR ADDITION OF
TWENTY (20) 30, 000 GALLON PROPANE STORAGE TANKS
TO AN EXISTING FACILITY AND SPECIAL PERMIT
SP-789-74 FOR FILL AND GRADE .
APPLICANT : WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS COMPANY
As the result of a detailed analysis of the subject proposal via
an Environmental Assessment , it has been determined that although
the project is a major action , there would be an insignificant
environmental impact . A Negative Environmental Impact is there-
fore declared .
Rationale or findings of fact supportive of this decision are as
follows :
1 . The subject project is the expansion of an existing
storage facility. Said expansion is contained
entirely within the present site , surrounded by
adequate buffer areas . Project does not increase
the safety factor of the existing facility nor
result in a detrimental impact on adjacent proper-
ties .
•
2 . No significant noxious emission or air pollutants
will be released into the atmosphere by the pro-
posed .facility . All engines operate on propane
which is noted as a clean fuel . Also filling of
the tanks is accomplished by a closed system,
whereby the liquid is pumped from the truck to
the tank and the vapors within the tank are trans-
mitted back into the truck .
3 . The storage facility is used only in times of
severe cold weather emergencies , and is shut down
as a closed dormant system unless such a need
arises .
4. No noises are emitted from the facility except
during times of operation . Existing enclosures ,
setbacks , and screening would tend to mitigate
these noises . Noises near the present site are
caused by separate existing gas pipeline facili -
ties located in King County .
5 . The proposed facility would produce no odors
except possibly insignificant amounts during emer-
gency operations .
6 . No smoke, dust or other air polluting substance
will result from the facility except those normal
to construction and occasional traffic generated
from maintenance and operation .
7 . All propane storage will be underground. The below
ground storage tanks have controls that create a
safer facility. The undergrounding allows for a
more stable temperature , 40-50 degrees . This is
important in maintaining low storage pressures .
C
NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS COMPANY
PAGE TWO
•
At 50° F. the pressure of propane within the tanks
would be 77 . 1 psig . The tanks are designed to 375
psig . Because of the pressure in the tanks , no
oxygen exists which would preclude any hazard of
fire . The temperature range for ignition of propane
is very limited , as documented in the Environmental
Assessment.
•
7 . The tanks will be buried with 18 inches of cover
at the same level as the existing tanks so as to
maintain the same hydrostatic pressure gradient .
The temperature and resulting pressure would not
be changed significantly, if the tanks were deeper.'
Additional soil coverage would create a berm effect .
8. The related piping is above ground so that valves
may be readily identified and operated , and to
provide access for inspection and preventative
maintenance , such as the detection and repair of
potential leaks at fittings . The piping is de-
signed for flexibility in the event of earth-
quake or outside disturbance .
9. The facility is equipped with automatic excess
flow valves which shut off flow from tanks should
piping be damaged. This isolates each tank as an
individual unit. These valves thus would prevent
any discharge from the tanks . A remote controlled
fail closed shut-off valve in the piping manifold
would limit discharge to 100 cubic feet of liquid
in the event the largest pipe is damaged . In
addition , each storage tank is provided with manual ,
valves which remain closed until manually opened
for operation of the plant. Evaporation rate of
liquid escaping from the piping would be very fast .
10. All containers and piping are protected from excess
internal pressure by safety-relief valves . The
relief valves are provided in duplicate as a "-redun-
dant safety feature and to provide for maintenance
of those valves .
11 . The site is well buffered from surrounding proper-
ties by topography , vegetation or combination
thereof. However, further buffering may be desir-
able as an extra safety precaution and visual buffer
to the facility .
12 . It appears that problems related to noise , odor, and
visual appearance are associated more with the exist-
ing substation in King County near the proposed
facility. The applicant has agreed to undertake
constructive action to remedy this situation as soon
as possible. S
RESP I OFFICIAL
ti
C.) �i r ,q PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6 RENTON,WASHINGTON
a MUNICIPAL BUILDING • RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 • WX000,0X
9 0 235-2550
9ysp0R7 CA PITA�°E�a�
October 10 , 1974
Paul Hogland
Senior Vice-president for Operations
Washington Natural Gas Company
P. 0. Box 1869
Seattle,., Washington 98111
RE: Planning Commission Site Plan Approval for
addition of twenty 30, 000 gallon propane
storage tanks at existing facility and
Special Permit for fill and grade.
Dear Mr. Hogland:
The Renton Planning Commission approved the subject
applications after a Public Hearing on October 9, 1974 .
This was also subsequent to detailed review o-f the
environmental significance, thorough study of all
other aspects of the proposed action, and a Negative
Declaration of Impact.
However, the approval was subject to the following
conditions :
1. All related codes and ordinances are met.
2. Additional buffering in the form of trees
and other landscaping must be provided
along the west property line. These
plans as well as proposed screening plans
for the additional storage must be
approved by the Planning Department.
3. The Planning Department may upon periodic
inspection require additional screening
at the site, especially with reference to
the west property line and the future
SR-515 route. •
Paul Hogland
Senior Vice-president for Operations
October 10, 1974
Page Two
4. The existing substation facilities should
be upgraded to decrease the noise, odors, and
visual' impacts they produce. Although powers
to require such upgrading are limited, both
gas companies involved should be encouraged
• to do so as "good neighbors" and in light of
proposed improvements in the area.
5. Any conditions set forth in previous appro-
vals.
6. Erosion control on bank above access road
subject to staff approval.
7. Planning and Engineering Departments ' appro-
val of final drainage plans .
8. Substantial screening buffer to be main-
tained around perimeter of the facility.
9 . Bond for installation of landscaping and a
three-year maintenance period.
In reference to the upgrading of facilities adjacent to •
the subject facility and in King County, we would hope
that this is begun immediately. Complaints have been
generated by this facility. We Would encourage timely
steps be taken to alleviate the problems of odor, noise, •
and visual appearance.
You may now make application for your annual filling
and grading license through the Building Department.
We also suggest that you check with the Building Depart-
ment and Fire Department regarding any other permits that
might be needed.
If you have any further questions, please contact this
department.
•
Very truly yours, •
Gordon Y. Ericksen
Planning Director
t • �G
(((Michael L. Smith
Assistant Planner
cc: Fire Department
Public Works Dept.
Renton Planning Commission
Meeting October 9 , 1974
Page Two
The Commission was referred to a memo from the City
of Renton Fire Department that indicated that the proposal
meets Uniform Fire Code and complies with recognized stand-
ards of that Code and to a statement from the King County
Land Use Management Division that the proposed development
was not expected to adversely affect the neighboring S-R
(Suburban Residential ) classified properties under County
jurisdiction in the vicinity but raising several environ-
mental questions .
Noting that several questions had been raised at the prev-
ious public hearing , the Chairman invited response from the
applicant.
Anthony Tessitore , Washington Natural Gas Company engineer ,
815 Mercer Street , Seattle , stated that his primary purpose
was to answer direct questions from the Commission . He
noted that they had worked closely with the staff with regard
to the Environmental Impact Assessment. Responding to the
environmental issues raised by the King County Land Use Man-
agement Division , he indicated that the problem of erosion
characteristics of the ravine located on the site were ad-
dressed in the soils report , which noted that with drainage
control , no problem was anticipated . He stated that they
had been in contact with the Department of Fisheries rela-
tive to any potential fisheries impact from culverting the
stream on the site and will have their approval before
commencement of the project .
The Chairman then recognized the Planning Director, who
reviewed the amended Environmental Impact Assessment for
the Commission . He noted the following statistics :
1 . Proposed installation - (20) 30 ,000 gallon pro-
pane tanks to be installed underground .
2 . Area of excavation - 75 ' x 275 ' ( ±2 acre ) .
3 . Grading material - 4 ,000 cubic yards .
4 . Filling material - 6 ,000 cubic yards (approximately
18" earth covering ) .
5 . Culvert - 350 ' of 36" culvert .
The plot plan was described in detail . He noted that the
staff had reviewed the assessment in order to address it-
self to questions raised . The continued public hearing was
readvertised and notices were sent to property owners in the
vicinity. Noting that the matter of public safety was signi -
ficant , he requested review by the Washington Natural Gas
representatives as to the potential of fire and a major
conflagration in the area . In terms of concerns noted by
SEPA, it is the staff ' s position that , while the proposed
addition is a major action , it has insignificant impact as
far as adding to any potential problems that presently
exist in the area . Mr. Ericksen then referred the Commis-
sion to staff recommendations , should approval be con-
sidered .
The Chairman invited further comment from the applicant .
Mr . Tessitore , Project Engineer , advised that propane stor-
age tanks are not unusual in Renton , some of which are
located above ground as well as underground . He described
the proposed tanks as built to AMSE specifications , composed
RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION
ADMINISTRATIVE MEETING !
OCTOBER 9, 1974 I
MINUTES
COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT : Don Humble , Larry Gibson ,
Anthone Mola , Bev Morrison , Norman Ross , Arthur Scholes ,
Patricia Seymour , Clark Teegarden , Bylund Wik .
COMMISSION MEMBERS ABSENT : None
CITY STAFF PRESENT : Gordon Ericksen , Planning Director ;
Michael Smith , Assistant Planner ; Willis Roberts , Recording
Secretary .
The October 1974 administrative meeting of the Renton Plan-
ning Commission was called to order at 8 : 00 p . m . by Commis -
sioner Ross , Chairman . The Pledge of Allegiance was led by
Commissioner Scholes .
-i • ROLL CALL was taken by Secretary Gibson . All members
responded present .
2 • APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The Chairman called for additions and corrections to the
minutes of the meeting of September 25 , 1974 .
In order to allow more time for review , IT WAS MOVED
BY SCHOLES , SECONDED BY MORRISON , THAT APPROVAL OF
THE MINUTES BE CONTINUED FOR TWO WEEKS . Discussion
followed with regard to the necessity for approved
minutes being available for the City Council public
hearing of October 21 . On the question , MOTION
DEFEATED .
ACTION:
MOVED BY SEYMOUR, SECONDED BY WIK, THAT APPROVAL OF THE
MINUTES BE PLACED AT THE END OF THE AGENDA FOR DISCUS-
SION AT THAT TIME . MOTION CARRIED.
-3 • CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS':
SITE (USE) APPROVAL - SPECIAL PERMIT (FILL)
A, WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS CO . ; Appl . No . SA-790-74 ;
site (use ) approval to allow expansion of existing
gas storage plant in R- 1 zone ; Appl . No . SP-789-74
special permit to allow excavation and grading in
R- 1 zone ; property located between S . Puget Dr .
and Williams Ave . S .
The Chairman invited a review of previous action and
background information from the Planning Director .
The Planning Director reviewed the request , noting
the 17 acre site of the present Washington Natural
Gas facility on the vicinity map . He reviewed ques -
tions raised by the Planning Commission with regard
to public safety and environmental concerns . He
referred the Commission to a staff report relative
to the environmental assessment submitted by the
applicant and noted that Washington Natural Gas repre-
sentatives were available for further response .
Renton Planning Commission
Meeting October 9 , 1974
Page Four
that the Planning Commission must make the determination
that a development is not detrimental to adjacent property
or the enjoyment thereof. In so doing , the Commission has
the right to consider such factors as air and water pollu-
tion , land use impact , noise , traffic controls , view , etc . ,
and can attach special conditions to alleviate or mitigate
detrimental effects .
In response to Scholes , Mr. Tessitore noted that Washington
Natural Gas has no plans for the sale of property which
now serves as a buffer zone around the facility.
Scholes inquired , if there was any possibility that the
plant might be placed in operation at a temperature other
than the presently planned +10°F . Mr. Tessitore advised
that the function of the station is peak-shaving and that
it would not be economical to supply gas to the consumer
through the facility . Paul Hogland , Senior Vice-president
for Operations, Washington Natural Gas Company , stated that
in a "design year" it would be necessary to require the
operation for about 15 days or at about +20°F , but there
was an economic limit , inasmuch as propane is approximately
four times as costly as natural gas .
Scholes requested a status report regarding the proposed
SR-515 highway . The Planning Director stated that some
right-of-way has been acquired ; but due to budget cutbacks ,
construction is not expected within the next three to five
years .
Responding to Scholes , Mr. Hogland advised that a 1963 sur-
vey revealed an abaondoned coal mine shaft opening in the
northern portion of the property , but it is substantially
north of the tract in current use and not in the area of
proposed construction . Mr. Hogland also noted in answer
to Scholes that the present tanks have been in existence
for ten years and that the Company had never experienced
a rupture in any of their propane storage tanks at any of
their operations , some of which dated back to the early
1930 ' s .
Mr. Hogland discussed the subject of odors emitted , as
noted by Commissioner Scholes , and reported that they are
emanating from the nearby facility in King County. He
stated that equipment was installed in 1956 and that a
new type of equipment has been ordered and will be in-
stalled as soon as it is available . He said the Company
recognizes the problem and feels they can and will con-
trol it .
Mr. Hogland described the process of converting the pro-
pane from a liquid to gas , as requested by Teegarden , and
indicated that it was provided the customer in a mixture
of 50% propane to 50% natural gas and recognized in the
same manner as natural gas . Mr. Hogland did admit that
natural gas , air and a source of ignition could explode ,
but stated their operation is within limits that are nor-
mally accepted . Stating that their Company is in the
business of handling materials similar to this in tremen-
dous quantities on a daily basis , Mr . Hogland said they
feel the proposed operation is explosion-proof .
Responding to Teegarden , Mr . Hogland estimated that it
would take approximately 15 minutes for the propane ( 750
gallons ) to evaporate , should there be a rupture . He stated
that any flow would be defined in a puddle configuration
within the confines of their fence and not affect the stream.
Renton Planning Commission
Meeting October 9 , 1974
Page Three
of carbon steel 7/8" thick , weighing 60 ,000 pounds , and
hydrostatically tested . The proposed tank is commonly
used either above or below ground . Underground installa-
tion is proposed for aesthetic reasons , to reduce varia-
tions in temperatures as propane is subject to vapor
pressures , and for additional safety. He described pro-
visions for safety , noting that the limit of flammabil -
ity of propane is relatively narrow and that each tank
is an integral unit providing for no transfer of fire
to other containers . Mr. Tessitore stated that the
Code recognizes the intrinsic safety of buried con-
tainers and places no limitations on numbers or sizes
of these containers . The Washington Gas Company engi -
neer then described the automatic excess flow valve
system, which shuts off flow from tanks , should piping
be ruptured , thus limiting flow to other tanks . He
noted fail control valves which would limit discharge
to 100 cubic feet of propane , substantially less than
the Code allowance . The provision of safety relief
valves in duplicate as a safety feature were also noted .
Chairman Ross invited comment from the audience , either
in favor or in opposition to the proposal , but received
no response . He then opened the discussion to the Plan-
ning Commission .
Responding to Commissioner Gibson , Assistant Planner
Smith stated that the Fire Department has indicated
its approval of the proposal based on compliance with
the Fire Code . Gibson queried Mr. Tessitore regarding
the valving structure for a fail -safe operation on
each tank and was advised that there are provisions
for removal and testing them independently of other
valves .
Responding to Gibson , Mr . Tessitore stated that the
plant will not produce odors because vapors will not
be released from the facility. He noted the problem
exists at another facility nearby , which will be in-
vestigated by the Company . He stated that expected
operation of the facility is only once in ten years .
Mr . Tessitore , in response to a request from Gibson
for a description of 100 cubic feet of propane , stated
that it would encompass 10 ' x 10 ' x 1 ' or in terms of
gallons , 750 gallons . Mr . Tessitore advised that 750
gallons would be the total loss from the entire mani -
fold for all the tanks , should a rupture occur .
Mr. Tessitore described the appearance of the pro-
pane in the event of a spill . Inasmuch as propane
boils at -40°F , it would- appear to be boiling and
would rapidly disappear into the atmosphere .
The Planning Director , in answer to a request by Com-
missioner Scholes , advised that the legal status of
Washington Natural Gas Company had been discussed with
the Assistant City Attorney , who advised that the Com-
pany would be included in the quasi -public category ,
which allows this particular use in an R-1 zone . The
utility is privately owned but has public powers and
falls under the control of the Washington Utilities
and Transportation Commission . Mr . Ericksen stated
Renton Planning Commission
Meeting October 9 , 1974
Page Five
Commissioner Teegarden noted the possibility of a rup-
ture of piping exposed above ground as the result of a
truck out of control (on Puget Drive ) or other damage
and inquired if the valving system would control such
an incident. It was indicated by Mr. Hogland that the
valve system would control the break , although a bend
would be more likely as the piping is designed for a
high degree of impact .
Responding to Commissioner Humble , Mr. Hogland said
that the pipes are designed for flexibility in response
to earthquake or outside forces .
Referring to the staff recommendation for additional
buffering in the form of trees and other landscaping
along the west property line , Commissioner Mola sug-
gested that in the event of the construction of SR-515 ,
in addition to the buffering , a traffic barrier be
installed as a safety factor . Mr. Hogland noted that
there is a berm adjacent to the tank farm for safety
purposes and advised that they have worked with the
State Highway Department with regard to their design
and that the roadway is planned to be below grade .
Responding to Seymour , Mr. Hogland indicated that in
addition to the berm, retaining walls due to a cut
area are planned .
In reply to Commissioner Scholes , Mr. Hogland stated
that no natural gas is stored at the facility . 900 ,000
gallons of propane are presently stored , and the addi -
tion of 600 ,000 gallons is proposed . It is a feed-
point through which natural gas travels and is distri -
buted north through Renton , south to Kent and SeaTac ,
and west across Vashon Island . About 180 ,000 ,000 cubic
feet of gas per day is passed through .
Mr. Hogland advised Seymour that any sabatoge that may
occur at the nearby substation would not have influence
on the plant. He also noted that the tanks at the
Renton facility could not be used for the storage of
natural gas due to their design .
Responding to Seymour ' s questions with regard to land-
scaping , Mr . Hogland stated that relative to the easterly
side , there is a considerable span between the access
roadway and the property lines which is in natural growth
and will not be disturbed .
Seymour inquired if the facility is likely to remain as
at present and was informed by Mr . Hogland that except
for the present plans to double it , there are no fore-
seeable plans for additional expansion .
In reply to Scholes , Mr. Hogland indicated that he was
unfamiliar with a "national petroleum permit" or "design
permit. " Also responding to Scholes , he advised that he
did not mean to imply that incidents with regard to fire
could not happen , but they have done everything to take
positive action to see that they do not occur.
Referring to concerns listed by the King County Land
Use Management Division with regard to potential ero-
sion of the ravine and fisheries impact from culverting
the stream, Seymour asked the Planning Director to dis-
cuss staff evaluation of the issues raised . Mr. Erick-
sen noted staff recommendations for erosion control
Renton Planning Commission
Meeting October 9 , 1974
Page Six
measures and stated that the staff did work with the appli -
cant specifically with reference to the areas involved .
Referring to fisheries impact , the matter was investigated ,
and it was determined that the stream is not a fisheries
resource .
Discussion followed , and it was noted that any change in
use or additions of a major nature would require Planning
Commission review in terms of the Zoning Ordinance .
The Chairman again invited comment from the audience but
received no response . It was then MOVED BY SCHOLES , SECONDED
BY MOLA , THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING BE CLOSED . MOTION CARRIED.
ACTION:
MOVED BY SCHOLES, SECONDED BY MORRISON, THAT THE PLANNING
COMMISSION GRANT THE SPECIAL PERMIT FOR FILLING AND APPROVE
THE SITE PLAN AS SUBMITTED IN APPLICATIONS SP-789-74 AND
SA-790-74 SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING:
1 . ALL RELATED CODES AND ORDINANCES ARE MET.
2. ADDITIONAL BUFFERING IN THE FORM OF TREES AND
OTHER LANDSCAPING MUST BE PROVIDED ALONG THE WEST
PROPERTY LINE. THESE PLANS AS WELL AS PROPOSED
SCREENING PLANS FOR THE ADDITIONAL STORAGE MUST
BE APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
3. THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAY UPON PERIODIC INSPEC-
TION REQUIRE ADDITIONAL SCREENING AT THE SITE,
ESPECIALLY WITH REFERENCE TO THE WEST PROPERTY
LINE AND THE FUTURE SR-515 ROUTE.
4. THE EXISTING SUBSTATION FACILITIES SHOULD BE
UPGRADED TO DECREASE THE NOISE, ODORS AND VISUAL
IMPACTS THEY PRODUCE. ALTHOUGH POWERS TO REQUIRE
SUCH UPGRADING ARE LIMITED, BOTH GAS COMPANIES
INVOLVED SHOULD BE ENCOURAGED TO DO SO AS "GOOD
NEIGHBORS" AND IN LIGHT OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
IN THE AREA .
5. ANY CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN PREVIOUS APPROVALS.
6. EROSION CONTROL ON BANK ABOVE ACCESS ROAD SUBJECT
TO STAFF APPROVAL.
7. PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT'S APPROVAL OF
FINAL DRAINAGE PLANS .
Discussion followed , and the following amendment was
offered :
ACTION:
MOVED BY SEYMOUR, SECONDED BY SCHOLES, THAT THE MOTION BE
AMENDED TO INCLUDE WITH REGARD TO LANDSCAPING, A SCREENING
BUFFER AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE FACILITY AND TO REQUIRE
PERFORMANCE BONDS FOR 150% OF INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE
OF THE NEW LANDSCAPE PLAN.
Speaking in support of the amendment , Seymour indicated
that it is an expression of Planning Commission intention
that the buffer be preserved , that landscaping replacing
Renton Planning Commission
Meeting October 9 , 1974
Page Eight
Assistant Planner Smith pointed out the 4 . 5 acre site on
the map , noting that the property is located to the south
of Grady Way on either side of Talbot Road . Property to
the south and east is zoned H-1 , and sites north of Grady
Way are zoned L- 1 . Adjacent uses include the Puget Sound
Power and Light substation to the south and an auto rebuild
facility on S . 7th Street. He noted that the site consists
of two parts . The easterly portion is approximately three
acres , and the westerly portion , which is bisected by a
powerline easement, is 1 . 5 acres . The Comprehensive Land
Use Plan designates the area as M-P/L- 1 .
The Chairman invited questions regarding issues to be con-
sidered at the forthcoming public hearing .
Commissioner Mola suggested that the applicant be encour-
aged to consider landscaping of their plant adjoining the
site . Noting the addition of some screening along Talbot
Road , Mr. Smith indicated the subject would be reviewed .
•
Seymour requested information as to the jurisdiction of
the Planning Commission with regard to the requested
rezone . Noting that the Comprehensive Land Use Plan desig-
nates the area as L- 1 or M-P , the Planning Director ad-
vised that the Commission may review the various alterna-
tives and can recommend to the applicant that he amend his
application . Wik asked if the applicant had been approached
by the staff in regard to M-P in lieu of L-1 . Assistant
Planner Smith stated the matter would be reviewed .
Humble indicated that he would like information regarding
future use of the property . This request was also made
by Morrison and Teegarden . Seymour noted that the reasons
for requesting rezoning should be provided by the appli -
cant at the time of public hearing and that each applica-
tion should be considered on its own merits despite zoning
that had been granted in the past .
Scholes requested that an opinion be obtained from the
City Attorney relative to public utilities as it might
pertain to this rezone .
Gibson suggested that the whole area be reviewed from an
M-P standpoint. Gibson also requested information regard-
ing the circumstances designating a narrow strip of land
located along FAI-405 in the vicinity as S-1 .
SITE APPROVAL
B. JOSEPH T . RYERSON & SON , INC . ; Appl . No . SA-791-74 ;
site approval to construct office and steel fabri -
cation and warehouse building in M-P zone ; property
located on S . W. 10th St. between Thomas Ave . S . W.
and Lind Ave . S . W.
Chairman Ross requested staff review. Assistant Planner
Smith pointed out the ten acre parcel located in Earling-
ton Industrial Park on the map and noted the area is zoned
M-P . Proposed construction is for an office , steel fabri -
cation and warehouse facility . Mr. Smith displayed views
of the elevation of the proposed 39 foot high facility
and described landscaping plans .
Renton Planning Commission
Meeting October 9 , 1974
Page Seven
existing vegetation should be maintained and that re-
quiring a performance bond was consistent with previous
Commission action with regard to landscaping .
On the amendment, MOTION CARRIED, MORRISON DISSENTING.
Further discussion ensued with Mola expressing concern
with regard to provisions for some type of safety bar-
rierwith relation to the future SR-515 route . It was
noted by the Planning Director that condition number
three of the original motion , which states "that the
Planning Department may upon periodic inspection re-
quire additional screening at the site , especially
with reference to the west property line and the
future SR-515 route , " provides for that design review.
However, it was indicated by Mola that it was his opin-
ion that a definite requirement for review should be
stipulated , and the following amendment was offered .
ACTION:
MOVED BY MOLA , SECONDED BY SEYMOUR, THAT CONDITION
NUMBER THREE OF THE ORIGINAL MOTION BE AMENDED TO
READ AS FOLLOWS:
"THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAY UPON PERIODIC INSPEC-
TION REQUIRE ADDITIONAL SCREENING AND SAFETY DEVICES
AT THE SITE, ESPECIALLY WITH REFERENCE TO THE WEST
PROPERTY LINE AND THE FUTURE SR-515 ROUTE. "
A roll call vote was requested with the following
results :
HUMBLE - AYE
GIBSON - AYE
MOLA - AYE
MORRISON - NO
ROSS - ABSTAIN
SCHOLES - AYE
SEYMOUR - AYE
TEEGARDEN - NO
WII< - NO
In view of the tie results , the Chairman cast his vote .
Ross voted NO, AND THE MOTION WAS DEFEATED.
On the original motion , with first amendment , THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Commissioners Teegarden and Gibson thanked the represen-
tatives of Washington Natural Gas Company for their forth-
right manner in answering the questions .
A recess was declared at 9 : 50 p . m. The meeting was resumed
at 10 : 05 p . m. , with all members noted as being present .
4 . NEW PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS :
REZONE
A. PUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGHT CO. ; Appl . No . R-792-74 ;
rezone from S-1 to L- 1 ; property located on Grady
Way at Talbot Road .
The Chairman invited a presentation from the Planning
staff.
INTER-OFFICE MEMO
TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE 10/9/74
FROM: FIRE DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS PEAK SHAVING PLANT ON TALBOT HILL
THE ATTACHED ASSESSMENT MEETS THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE AND COMPLIANCE
WITH RECOGNIZED STANDARDS OF THAT CODE.
•
O F R M.L. RERTZ, FIRE MARSHAL
gENEbv
. OCT 9 1974
•
•
c) 'AD THE CITY .,OF RENTON -
` o MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
0 AVERY GARRETT, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
13
AO 235 - 2550
44.
DSEP1*- October 9 , 1974
MEMORANDUM
•
•
TO : Files'
' FROM: Michael L . Smith , Assistant Planner
RE : Meeting with Assistant City Attorney
RE : Washington Natural Gas Company .
Gordon Y . Ericksen , Planning Director and I met
today with Jack Pain , Assistant City Attorney to discuss
various items of concern regarding the Washington Natural
Gas Company ' s site approval application and special permit
for fill and grade .
1 . Mr . Pain felt that this facility could not
be in any way likened to the Shell facility
upon the receipt of the information from
the environmental assessment which was
required . He assured us that it would pose
no threats to the Shell case that is presently
pending court action .
2 . He felt , as we did , that the expansion of , '
the tank facility would be properly handled
' through Section 4-706 , (3) of the zoningcovs. •
It was his opinion that Washington Natural
Gas is considered a quasi -public institution...
3 . He also agreed with us to the powers of the '
Planning Commission in such cases . They
would have the powers of; •
a) determining whether the use should
be allowed on the site , and
b) if it is allowed they would have the
power to attach reasonable conditions
to protect adjacent properties and the '
general welfare of the community. . . .
MLS :ms
U 'peaR THE CITY OF RENTON
2 o MUNICIPAL BUI LING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
0 co AVERYGARRETT, MAVOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
p 235 - 2550
�ATFO
MEMORANDUM
October 8, 1974
TO: Fire. Department
FROM: Planning Department
RE: WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS PEAK-SHAVING
PLANT ON TALBOT HILL
Would you please provide us with a letter advising us
whether the attached assessment meets all the safety
standards.
We would appreciate an immediate response, as this
issue is appearing before the Planning Commission •
Meeting on October 9 , 1974.
Thank you.
Attachment
JAL:ms
•
• /A.f /Y440. glir
.
-
•
•
Affidavit of Publication
• STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF KING ss.
Par.h.?T.t..jmnJD n31.. being first duly sworn on
•
oath, deposes and says that she is the chief cler14 of
THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a tri-weekly newspaper. That
said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for
more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to,
printed and published in the English language continually as a tri-
weekly newspaper in Renton, King County, Washington, and it is now
and during all-of said time was printed in an office maintained at the NOTICE CIF PUB IIXIEME
aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper. That the Renton RENTON GIMOREI o o
Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of 'FNTON, WASHING ON
the Superior Court of the County in which it is published, to-wit, King - I A PUBLIC HEARING:.WILL BE,
Count , HELD BY THE RENTON -PLAN'-
y NING COMMISSION AT ITS REGU-
Washington.That the annexed is a r ublic he�arino- ;LAR MEETING IN THE 'COUNCIL
CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON,
WASHINGTON, ON OCTOBER 9,
1974, AT 8:00 P.M. TO CONSIDER
• o I S niants..ecc.. I THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS:
1. SITE (USE) APPROVAL TO
,ALLOW EXPANSION OF EXISTING
as it was published in regular issues (and • GAS STORAGE PLANT IN R-1'
not in supplement form of said newspaper)once each issue for a period ZONE; file No. SA-790-74; proper-
'ty located between S` Puget Dr.
,and Williams Ave. S.'Legal de-'
of Q)t ' • consecutive issues, commencing on the scription on file in Planning De- .
ti " partmerit office.
2. SPECIAL PERMIT;TO ALLOW I
1.. day of Cot,. , 194E , and ending the EXCAVATION AND,GRADING IN R-I
1 ZONE; file No, SP-789-74; prop-'
erty located between S._Ruget Dr.
day of , 19 ,both dates and.Williams Ave. S. .Legal deb
inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its scription:on.file,in Planning'De`
subscribers during all of said period.That the full amount of the fee partmerit office.
ALL PERSONSINTERESTED"OR
OBJECTING TO 'SAID PETITIONS
charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of$ 1,.�*a./which THE PLANNING ARE INVITE PRESENT AT
. SS ION,
has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words MEETING ON' OCTOBER•9, 1974,
for the first insertion and per folio of one hundred s for each AT 8:00 P.M. TO VOICE THEIR'
PROTESTS OR OBJECTIONS.TO.
subsequent insertion. • SAME.
• • , LARRY GIBSON,SECRETARY
4LRENTON MISSION'
Published innNtheRen on:Records
Chronicle October `, 1974;
chir:•f clerk ,R2955. .
•
Li
Subscribed and sworn to before me this • day of
Oct. 7L. •
,19 nn •
•
• Notary Pub c n and for the State of Washington,
_ _ re di g at Renton,King County.
•
•
—Passed by the Legislature, 1955, known as Senate Bill 281,effective •
June 9th,,1955.. • . •
—Western.Union Telegraph Co.rules for counting words and figures,
adopted•by the newspapers of the State. •
King County Sii1I11 1)I Wildtinttton Dupurtnlunt of Community
John D. Spullmun, County Exucutivu and Environmuntal Duvulopmunt
._ . Thomas M. Ryan, Director
,fit
LAND USE MANAGEMENT DIVISION OF
EDWARD B. SAND, DIRECTOR • C> n 4)<<`
W217 King County Courthouse �//� /fj�
Seattle,Washington 98104
206-344-4292 -cr OCT
October 4, 1974 : v •••..� 197
it 2
Michael L. Smith, Assistant Planner 2�,1, ••••�`'•• ,�
City of Renton Planning Department M \
�FPAR�
Municipal Building :/
Renton, Washington 98055
Regarding: Environmental Assessment, Proposed Addition of
Twenty 30 ,000 Gallon Storage Tanks to 'Washington
Natural Gas Peak Shaving Plant
Dear Mr. Smith:
This is in response to your September 30, 1974 correspondence
regarding the subject matter. '
It is not expected that the proposed development would adversely
affect the neighboring S-R (Suburban Residential) classified prop-
. erties under County jurisdiction in the vicinity. The existing
tank field lies between the proposed expansion and the afore-
mentioned properties . No alteration of existing traffic patterns
would result.
However, with regard to the environmental assessment, the following
issues should be considered:
1 . Site characteristics include a ravine, Alderwood gravelly loam
soils ( according to SCS Soils report) with severe erosion
potential, and a stream. Consequently , the assessment should
more completely and explicitly state intended or required
mitigating or controlling measures to reduce the- potential
erosion and sedimentation of the project, and the potential
adverse impact of such erosion.
2. Additionally, the question of any potential fisheries impact
from culverting and erosion should be clearly answered before
any project approval. •
Thank you for the opportunity to comment this proposal .
Yours very truly,
o
Edward B. Sand, Director,
Land Use Management Division
EBS :08:js
\m , 4 2. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ®''RENTON,WASHINGTON
trp e MUNICIPAL BUILDING laRENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 ® XXIC 3X0
P ,�° 235-2550
9ysp0RT CA PITA�OE���
September 30, 1974
Edward B. Sand, Director
W217 King County Courthouse .
Seattle, Washington 98104
RE: Proposed Addition of Twenty (20) 30 , 000
Gallon Storage Tanks to Existing Washington ,
Natural Gas Peak Shaving Plant
Dear Mr. Sand:
Our Planning Commission is presently reviewing
the abovementioned application. Attached are some of
the plans submitted and a draft environmental assess-
ment to further describe the application.
We are presently asking for additional information ,
and data to be included in the assessment, so that we
can make a reasonably educated determination of environ-
mental significance. ,
We would appreciate your review of the proposal ,
and any comments you might have. What is presently
called "Talbot Island, " as you are aware, is within the ' . ' •• ,
jurisdiction of King County and adjacent to the subject ' '.
site. ' ',
We are aware that you and your staff have other
commitments , but would appreciate any comments you '
might have by October 7, 1974 , so that we might include • , ,
them in preparing our staff report to the Commission.
c
, Very truly, yours; , .
' //b , /I/ / 7 _Le.--
, Michael L. Smith
'Assistant Planner
OF R.,�
THE CITY OF RENTON
z o MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
o AVERY GARRETT, MAYOR ® PLANNING DEPARTMENT
'0 (2- 235 - 2550
O4 0.
SE P� -
MEMORANDUM
•
•
September 25 ,. 1974
TO: Files
FROM: Mike Smith
SUBJECT: Washington Natural Gas Site Approval
and Special Permit (Cut and Fill)
Joan Lankford and I met today with Tony Tessitore
and Arnold Olson of Washington Natural Gas Company.
We informed them that we needed additional speci-
fic information, especially with respect to safety
and reasons for the additional storage tanks. We
asked that this additional information with sup-
portive data and references be included in the Envi-
ronmental Assessment. Most of these items had been
discussed at previous meetings or were discussed at
this meeting, and we asked that they simply be in-
cluded in the assessment with the necessary sup-
portive data.
They agreed that some items needed more explora-
tion and supportive data, but at the same time
they feared the document would become too wordy
and technical. We said that we welcomed all the
technical data to back up their rationale that
they could reasonably present. We explained that
we needed as much backup information as could
possibly be assembled in order to make an accurate
determination of environmental significance.
N
RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION
PUBLIC HEARING MEETING
SEPTEMBER 25, 1974
MINUTES
COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT: Don Humble , Larry Gibson ,
Anthone Mola , Norman Ross , Arthur Scholes , Clark Teegarden ,
Bylund Wik.
COMMISSION MEMBERS ABSENT: Bev Morrison , Patricia Seymour.
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Gordon Ericksen , Planning Director ;
Michael Smith , Assistant Planner; Willis Roberts , Recording
• Secretary.
The September 1974 public hearing meeting of the Renton Plan-
ning Commission was called to order at 8: 00 p . m. by Commis-
sioner Ross , Chairman . The Pledge of Allegiance was led by
Commissioner Mola .
1 . ROLL CALL was taken by Secretary Gibson . All members
responded present with the exception of Morrison ( illness ) ,
Seymour (out of town ) , and Scholes , who arrived at 8 : 04 p. m.
ACTION:
MOVED BY TEEGARDEN, SECONDED BY MOLA, THAT THE ABSENT
COMMISSIONERS BE EXCUSED. MOTION CARRIED.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Noting that the Commission had moved that approval of
the minutes of July 24 , 1974 , had been continued to
the September 25th meeting , Chairman Ross called for
additions or corrections .
Commissioner Scholes indicated that there were several
items of concern . With regard to the Shell Oil Company
Special Permit application , specifically page two , para-
graph two , "Planning Department recommendations and
Shell ' s compromise plans were also described , "
he asked if the Planning Department recommendations
and Shell ' s compromise plans were kept on record . The
Planning Director responded that they were a part of
the Planning Department Analysis , which is a part of
the permanent file on the subject .
With regard to page two , paragraph four, which cites
correspondence between Mobil Oil Corporation and
Councilman William Grant , Scholes requested that it
be noted in the record that the date of the Mobil Oil
Corporation letter was May 29 , 1974.
With regard to page three , paragraph three , relative
to the Planning Commission Comprehensive Plan Commit-
tee recommendation for denial , the Planning Director
advised Scholes that the complete report dated July 19 ,
1974 , is a part of the permanent file on the subject.
With regard to the substitute motion listed on page
five , Scholes questioned the necessity for recording
a substitute motion that had not received a second .
Chairman Ross and Commissioner Humble stated that it
was their opinion that the motion was a part of the
business and including it made the record absolutely
clear.
Renton Planning Commission
Meeting September 25, 1974
Page Two
ACTION:
MOVED BY SCHOLES, SECONDED BY HUMBLE, THAT THE MINUTES OF
JULY 24, 1974, BE APPROVED AS AMENDED AND CORRECTED AT
THE MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 11 , 1974, AND INCLUDING ADDITIONAL
CORRECTIONS AND AMENDMENTS OF THIS DATE. MOTION CARRIED.
Chairman Ross called for additions or corrections to the
minutes of September 11 , 1974.
Commissioner Scholes requested that all questions and
requests raised by the Commissioners be included in the
minutes . He asked that the following items be noted :
With regard to the Dick Colosurdo Preliminary Plat
Application , Scholes had requested that the staff
offer an opinion regarding the acceptability of
pipe-stem lots versus public rights-of-way .
With regard to the Louis B. Rowley rezone and special
permit requests , Scholes asked that it be noted that
he had requested a staff review of the Commission ' s
powers regarding density and landscaping changes and
revising setbacks .
M With regard to the Washington Natural Gas Company
Site (Use) Approval and Special Permit Application ,
Scholes asked inclusion of his request for a legal
opinion as to the implied or inherent rights of expan-
sion of projects similar to this ; request for an environ-
mental assessment ; request for a letter of acceptability
of the project by King County; Commissioner Gibson ' s
request for a report from the Fire Department on how
they would handle the total proposed facility ; and
Commissioner Seymour' s request that adjacent property
owners be advised by mail of the public hearing .
ACTION:
MOVED BY SCHOLES, SECONDED BY TEEGARDEN, THAT THE MINUTES
OF SEPTEMBER 11 , 1974, BE APPROVED AS AMENDED TO INCLUDE
THE ABOVE COMMENTS. MOTION CARRIED.
At the request of the Chairman , Commission Secretary Gibson
counted the number of people in attendance and reported that
there were 38 people in the audience . The Chairman then intro-
duced staff members attending and Eric Pryne of the "Record-
Chronicle . " Ross then introduced the continued public hearing
items .
3 . CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS :
REVIEW OF COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN
A. REVIEW OF THE CITY ' S COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN IN
THAT AREA LOCATED GENERALLY IN THE VICINITY OF THE
VALLEY GENERAL HOSPITAL.
B. W. STEWART POPE ; APPLICATION FOR COMPREHENSIVE LAND
USE PLAN AMENDMENT FROM SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
TO PUBLIC AND QUASI PUBLIC USE ; property located at
3713 Talbot Road S .
At the request of the Chairman , the Planning Director
pointed out the location of the areas being reviewed and
noted significant development in the vicinity.
Renton Planning Commission
Meeting September 25 , 1974
Page Twelve
Slides and aerial photographs of the area were shown .
The Chairman invited comment from the applicant .
Paul Hogland , Senior Vice-president for Operations , Wash-
ington Natural Gas Company , stated that he was the Chief
Engineer at the time of original development of the facil -
ity. At the time of original approval , immediate and
future development was considered . At that meeting the
Commission approved the zoning as requested subject to
the Commission ' s review of detailed plans . These plans
were approved July 22 , 1964 . Mr. Hogland discussed their
provisions and indicated that it was their intention to
double the capacity of the facility in the reasonable
future at that time .
Mr. Hogland then reviewed the present proposal . Stating
that they service an area of 1 ,900 ,000 people , and
obtain gas from Northwest Pipeline Corporation , he said
that under their contractual operation with Northwest ,
they are limited in the quantity of natural gas they
may take in any given day . Noting a much higher require-
ment during extremely cold weather , Mr. Hogland stated
that propane gas is provided in such instances . Mr .
Hogland indicated that a short supply of natural gas is
expected for the coming winter due to a limited supply
from the Canadian supplier; and , therefore , they feel
additional storage must be provided prior to peak per-
iods . He noted that the Talbot Hill site is centrally
located and the source o.f supply to major service areas
to the north , south and west of Renton .
Mr. Hogland then cited reasons they believe the requested
permit should be approved . The site is a greenbelt area
with limited access ; the plan has no impact in their
opinion on surrounding land uses ; the facility has made
significant contribution to the tax base of the commun-
ity; and natural gas is used extensively in the Renton
area . He noted similar storage existing at businesses
and schools in Renton and described provisions for safety .
Tony Tessatore , Engineer representing Washington Natural
Gas Co . , 815 Mercer St . , Seattle , addressed the matter
of environmental impact and discussed the safety aspects .
Mr. Tessatore stated that less than one-half an acre of
the 17 acre tract is involved in the expansion . Slides
were viewed . Plans for screening , fencing and replace-
ment of lost vegetation were described . No stability
or drainage problems are expected . Mr. Tessatore stated
that the proposed installation does not increase the
hazard factor. No significant amount of pollution is
anticipated. Regarding the noise factor , there is gen-
erally less noise than in a residential area . The
normal operation is essentially a stand-by operation
with a roving patrol on •a 24 hours per day schedule .
He stated that there are no alternates to this location .
Bob Tomlinson , attorney for Washington Natural Gas Com-
pany , stated that Washington Natural Gas is a public
utility company with a mandate to serve citizens of the
State of Washington with natural gas . That responsibility
/ requires planning so as to be able to meet high peak
loads during periods of extremely cold weather. He noted
Renton Planning Commission
Meeting September 25 , 1974
Page Eleven
Slides and aerial photographs of the area were then viewed .
Following a brief discussion concerning the questions
raised relative to lot size , it was
ACTION:
MOVED BY MOLA, SECONDED BY GIBSON, THAT THE LOUIS B. ROWLEY
APPLICATIONS FOR REZONE AND SPECIAL PERMIT BE CONTINUED
UNTIL THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS CLARIFIED, AND THAT THE MATTER
THEN BE PLACED ON AN APPROPRIATE HEARING AGENDA .
Discussion followed , and it was noted that both applications
were affected by the discrepancy and to withdraw them would
involve another filing fee .
Mr. Synder then stated that he had refigured the property
and noted that the lot is 197 feet in length by 75 feet
in width .
The Chairman pointed out that the legal description and plan
do not agree . The Planning Director stated that the matter
would be investigated with all parties involved .
Commission Teegarden , noting that the plans submitted were
sketch plans , requested specific information as to how
many units will be provided , what they are going to look
like , and where they will be placed on the property . It
was agreed by the Commission that they would only act on
detailed plans .
ON THE QUESTION: MOTION CARRIED.
SITE (USE) APPROVAL - SPECIAL PERMIT
C. WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS CO . ; Appl . No . SA-790-74 ; site
(use ) approval to allow expansion of existing gas
storage plant in R- 1 zone ; Appl . No . SP-789-74 ; special
permit to allow excavation and grading in R- 1 zone ;
property located between S . Puget Dr. and Williams Ave . S .
The Chairman invited background information from the Plan-
ning Director.
Mr. Ericksen pointed out the site on the vicinity map and
noted that it is the location of the existing facility
operated by Washington Natural Gas Company. The proposal
is for the addition of twenty 30 ,000 gallon propane tanks,
to be installed underground . The site is situated in a
single family residential zone .
The Planning Director reviewed the history of the original
approval of the facility , which was granted in 1964 , when
the property was zoned R-1 utility reserve . The current
Zoning Ordinance designates an R-1 zone , which allows
quasi -public institutions upon approval by the Planning
Commission . The Planning Director then noted the site
on the topographical map and described the elevation of
the site . He pointed out the 19 existing storage
tanks and proposed location for the new tanks .
The Planning Director then described plans for installa-
tion of the new tanks on the 360 ' x 150 ' site . He noted
proposed changes to the landscaping due to removal of
some existing vegetation . He then referred the Commission
to the staff report in which comments regarding the environ-
mental impact assessment were noted .
Renton Planning Commission
Meeting September 25 , 1974
Page Fourteen
information to be submitted shortly . Review by the
Soil Conservation Service has been requested . The Com-
mission will be advised , when the EIS is completed .
COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE
Commissioner Scholes , Chairman of the Community Services
Committee , announced a meeting at 7 : 30 p .m. , October 2 ,
regarding outstanding referral items .
In view of the late hour, it was MOVED BY SCHOLES , SECONDED
BY HUMBLE , THAT THE ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS BE CONTINUED TO THE
OCTOBER 9 AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED.
As there was no further business before the Commission , it was
MOVED BY HUMBLE , SECONDED BY . MOLA, TO ADJOURN THE MEETING.
MOTION CARRIED.
The meeting was adjourned at 1 :00 a .m.
Larry , &ecref
Gibs()� Y
✓fr/ d
Norman Ross , Chairman
Renton Planning Commission
Meeting September 25 , 1974
Page Thirteen
minimal environmental impact , including no visual impact.
He also noted plans to place tanks on a site previously
approved for such usage .
Teresa McKay , 7800 S . 130th , Seattle , inquired as to how the
propane gas would be delivered to the facility. Mr . Hogland
responded that it would be delivered by tank trucks . Respond-
ing to Mrs . McKay , Mr. Hogland stated that it will require
about sixty tank truckloads to fill the station and that
operation should be accomplished within a . thirty to forty
day period . He stated that they hope to never have to fill
it again but weather is unpredictable . The present facility
has been used only once since its construction .
Mr. McKay , 7800 S . 130th , Seattle , asked if in the last ten
years there had been any instances of fire .
Mr. Hogland responded there had been none . Responding again
to Mr. McKay , Mr. Hogland indicated that tanks are loaded
with a pressure piping connection into the tank loading facil -
ity pump and moves the product into the tanks internally ,
and there would be no vapor emissions .
Mr. McKay inquired if the area is on an earthquake fault .
Mr. Ericksen advised that there are fault lines along the
westerly slope of Talbot Hill and noted that the entire
Puget Sound Basin is subject to earthquakes and the whole
area does have conditions that result in earth movement
under certain circumstances . Mr. Hogland stated that the
design takes into consideration earthquake faults .
Responding to Mr. McKay , Mr. Hogland indicated soil in the
area is glacial till and provides a solid foundation .
Grover Shegrud , 18216 - 196th Ave . S . , Renton , noting that
the facility has some danger potential , pointed out that it
is located in the vicinity of several schools . He questioned
if it was reasonable to expand an operation of this type at
this time and suggested continuance to allow public input.
Mr. Hogland stated that safety was a factor , when considering
any form of energy , and noted approximately twenty schools
in the area that have tankage of this size and capacity above
ground within fifty feet of their buildings .
Discussion among the Commissioners followed regarding the
questions. that had been raised and time required to resolve
them.
ACTION:
MOVED BY TEEGARDEN, SECONDED BY SCHOLES, THAT THE WASHINGTON
NATURAL GAS COMPANY APPLICATIONS FOR SITE (USE) APPROVAL AND
SPECIAL PERMIT BE CONTINUED UNTIL THE OCTOBER 9, 1974, PLAN-
NING COMMISSION MEETING. MOTION CARRIED.
5- ADMINISTRATIVE :
SCARSELLA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
Commissioner Mola requested a status report , noting that the
, pond on the Scarsella site is completely dried up .
The Planning Director advised that the staff had been in con-
tact with Mr. Scarsella and his representatives , regarding
preparation of the EIS , and the staff is expecting additional
1
1
4 pF R v
() 4 . Z PLANNING DEPARTMEN^' • RENTON,WASHINGTON
MUNICIPAL BUILDING • RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 • MM}8}{RW
Iffedsmen
'9 �0 235-2550
ys"3,0 CA PITA�OE��4
September 19 , 1974
Arnold H. Olson
Chief Engineer
Washington Natural Gas Company
815 Mercer Street
P. O. Box 1869
Seattle, Washington 98111
RE: September 18 , 1974 , Meeting regarding
Special Permit and Site Approval Appli-
cations and Environmental Assessment
for Proposed Additional Propane Storage
Tanks . (Attendance: Arnold Olson and
Anthony Tessitore, Washington Natural
Gas Company; Michael Smith and Joan Lank-
ford, Renton Planning Department)
Dear Mr. Olson:
Pursuant to our discussions at the abovementioned meet-
ing, we have requested an Environmental Assessment of
the proposed project so that we may more definitely
determine its environmental significance in terms of
the State Environmental Policy Act.
As discussed previously, safety aspects of the project
are probably the most overriding concern. What hazards
exist, to what degree would they increase with the addi-
tional storage, and what measures are taken to reduce
any possible hazards are the type of questions needing
thorough treatment in the safety element of the Environ-
mental Assessment.
We also gave you a brief outline of what we considered
the primary areas of concern. It was as follows :
1. Description of proposed action.
2 . Need or rationale for the proposed action.
Arnold H. Olson
Washington Natural Gas Company
September 19 , 1974
Page Two
3 . Existing conditions both man-made and
natural . (This would include a descrip-
tion of adjacent land uses . ) •
4. Various environmental impacts of the pro-
posed action:
a. safety
b. construction
c. to the natural environment
d. air and water pollution
e. odors
f. visual impacts
5. Mitigating measures taken to reduce any
anticipated impacts. (Include supportive data. )
6. Alternatives to the proposed action.
You were also given a copy of the procedures and suggested
Environmental Report for the State Environmental Policy
Act to supplement the above outline. We hope that this
will assist you in compiling an assessment that is thor-
ough, yet concise.
As mentioned, the Planning Commission cannot make its
decision until the matter of environmental significance
via S.E.P.A. is determined. If you have any further ques-
tions, please contact this department.
Very truly yours ,
Michael L. Smith
Assistant Planner
\\
Renton Planning Commission
Meeting September 11 , 1974
Page Three
•
The Chairman then invited comments from the Commission ,
•stating that he would solicit input and questions from
each Commissioner. • Requests were to be directed to the
staff or appropriate.: source for response prior to or
at the public hearing . The poll resulted in the follow-
ing requests : a review of the Restrictive Covenants.
for Fairview Terrace to determine applicability to
this application and an evaluation of the planned pipe-
stem lots versus a public right-of-way. Discussion
followed relative to the designation of the lots as
interior and lot coverage as it applies to the R-2
zone .
REZONE - SPECIAL PERMIT:
$, LOUIS B. ROWLEY ; Appl . R-787-74 ; rezone 'from. G to
R-2 ; App . SP-788-74; special permit to construct
10-unit apartment building in R-.2 zone ; property
located on Park Ave . N . between N . 30th St . and
N . 32nd St.
The Chairman introduced the proposed rezone and special
permit requests and invited review from the Planning
Director.
Mr. Ericksen pointed out the location of the 14 , 775± .
square foot site on the vicinity map . The rea'uested rezone
is in agreement with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan .
which designates the area as low density multi —family .
A request for special permit to construct a 10-unit:. apart-
ment' complex is proposed . '
Response from the Commission was invited by Chairman ;
Ross . Seymour asked for staff review: as to, normal land
coverage in an ' R-2' zone' as opposed to the coverage pro-
posed by the special permit application . Staff comment
and recommendation in regard to the Comprehensive Land •
Use Plan and zoning in the Kennydale area was requested
by Gibson and Wik . The Chairman suggested a .map of the
area showing the Comprehensive Land Use Plan designa-
tions in more detail . Humble , Chairman of the Compre-
hensive Plan Committee , advised that the study of the
Comprehensive Land Use Plan in the Kennydale area is
expected to proceed shortly .
Discussion followed 'regarding the approach to follow
in evaluating the applications .
SPECIAL PERMIT:
C. CHICAGO , MILWAUKEE , ST . PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD
CO . ; Appl . SP-763-74 ; special permit to allow filling
'and grading in G zone ; property' located at Black River
Junction . '
Noting that no action was planned f'or that evening ,. the
Chairman requested staff review from Mr . Ericksen . .
The Planning Director advised that a letter had been
received from the applicant amending their previous .
application for a special permit' for grading and' fill =
ing . He noted the revised area on the cross-section
map of the property . " There is no proposal for develop-
ment at the present time .
Renton Planning Commission
Meeting September 11 , 1974
Page Four
The Chairman called for comment from the Commission .
It was requested by Scholes and Humble that a map citing
;the zones and, topography of adjacent County areas be pro-
vided for Commission review. Seymour requested specific
information with regard to the revised application , in
particular an indication of intended use of the filled
property . •Scholes asked that the matter of environmental
assessment be re-evaluated in view of the amended applica-
tion .
SITE (USE) APPROVAL - SPECIAL PERMIT
D. WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS CO . ; Appl . No . SA-790-74; site (use)
approval to allow expansion of existing gas storage plant
in R-1 zone ; Appl . No . SP-789-74 ; special permit to allow
excavation and grading in R- 1 zone ; property located be-
tween S . Puget Dr. and Williams Ave . S .
The Chairman introduced the applications for special permit
and site (use ) approval., and requested background information
from the Planning Director.
Mr... Ericksen pointed out the location of the seventeen acre
site on the vicinity map . He noted the applicant proposes
to install an additional twenty 30 ,000 gallon gas storage
tanks on the present site , ' said tanks to be placed under-
ground and to involve grading of approximately 4 ,000 cubic
yards of native material and filling of approximately 6 ,000
cubic yards. Mr. Ericksen stated that Washington Natural
Gas Company is considered as a utility and public quasi
institution. He noted original approval of the peak shaving
plant in 1964. Nineteen larger tanks are presently in exist-
E •ence . He then noted the location of the proposed tanks and
Iplanned excavation and grading .
The Chairman invited comment from the Commission . Wik and .
Mola requested information regarding the conditions of
approval of the existing facility . Scholes suggested that an
investigation be made into the history of complaints that may
have been registered regarding odors from the plant . Ques-
tions were raised concerning the applicant ' s legal status as
a quasi public agency , technical differences between the
storage of natural gas and the type \proposed , the matter of
public safety , and environmental impact. -
5• ADMINISTRATIVE :
A, FIELD TRIP
Following discussion , it was MOVED BY SEYMOUR, SECONDED
BY MOLA, THAT A FIELD TRIP BE HELD MONDAY , SEPTEMBER 16 ,
1974, AT 7 : 00 P . M. , PARTICIPANTS TO MEET IN FRONT OF
CITY HALL. MOTION CARRIED .
$, COMMITTEE REPORTS .
The Chairman called for committee reports relative to
items to be considered in September.
1 . COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMMITTEE
Humble , Chairman of the Comprehensive Plan Committee,
announced plans for the Committee to meet on Septem-
ber 18, 1974 , with regard to the Comprehensive Land