Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA75-812
---------- - - - - -- ------ - -- 1 '"S I INVEST 1 WU,EST `__ CORPORATION I 35 SO. GRADY WAY • RENTON.WASHINGTON 951355 I COMMERCIAL & INVESTMENT PROPERTIES JAMES M. RENDAHL 226-4750 PRESIDENT SAP BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE SPECIH � USE PERMIT SP- � Ia - 75 IN R- .21 ZONE _ INVEST 1►JEST CO� PORATIOhI �1�� I75 • 1c00.°r-• . . r . i I , R-3 - — .. . CO " r. I a . \p.SP -aI I I // - �'.\`` pNN � S•Q6NT04 VILLAGE PL rr PIN- - 1 - R— 4 .....---_,--- --I ` r it -,,---- _ -'70pn spi,__-_____ - ad(4: _ \ \ •. • ___---r „ ��_••� 7Wr oy z ,. ,� GS�- 1 lir, iftlitmE:4,.... . 44 B-1 , — 47 4 4 wig 4�� \�� \\ 4� 1 ��A a�W R ID 1♦O N I IBII'2.21 boct Z+■� �' SPECIAL PERMIT: v; :Pgr.46,E'�0 T."t x FIR y INVEST WEST CORP. .04 Nr -*-- -..-.....-.- prirs1eidg 37 ; I `' gl�� ,,,,,,,,u,0,,t,„ 'e©D : \�I/ ., liploggar.,- A ... Imam ani \\ ....- . r , - . , \ , i i., .,,,..7-,,, , 46.„„„,,, ‘ , .....„ ..... ..._.„, E. • as a m. ���'9 Q®am= .,,T., .. 15- ' AO #496 0 � ���'�� .-f .4. [ Rill Vk " 11111:\11.::: Qs '� � off. oO El„yea.. '3 * i. _ „ _ - .. ©D.ill 7v O°paoo.vra©©tr i p .►' �I� R 3 o00 ,4 , ©© o• a , , , .., .4, , ,.. 'i . - • ! s'ss, \ s I .^ • • G-9 . 00 \� 1 SE6 . ,T �� —G7200 [ ) ♦ I \,.9 \``I` 111 e 7M T . ` • ••.r M i � A s f ',` \ . F= V 1 I.m © ra m . , 3 F 1 SR— I E IG4 I.I it r ST � S � . N ST _ .7 `— I . �1 3�y 1 .� y I • SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION: INVEST WEST CORPORATION; Appl. No. R-812-75; special permit to construct a. professional office and medical clinic facility in R-4 zoning; pro- perty located on Puget Drive. Between Puget Drive and Benson Road South-. APPLICANT INVEST WEST CORPORATION TOTAL AREA .72 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS Puget Drive EXISTING ZONING R-4 EXISTING USE Vacant PROPOSED USE Professional Office/Medical Clinic COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN High Density Multiple Family-Residential Use COMMENTS • CITY OF RENTON ` cgaFNh APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT ° APR 2 19" . \( FOR OFFICE USE ONLY j &:::717°1 File No. SP kid 7�. Fee $50 .00 "IN Date Rec'd y -a -7�� Receipt No. .`07o APPLICANT TO COMPLETE I'EMS, l THROUGH 6: 1. Name INVEST WEST CORPORATION ' Phone 226 - 4750 Address 35 - S. ' Grady.•Way, Renton, Washington 2. Property location Parcel on Puget Drive, Renton, Washington. Adjacent and North of the VallevLEar, Nose & Throat Clinic. 3. Legal description (.teach additional sheet if necessary) ( 'ATTACHED i - • apt ,7 4. Number of acres or tlq. ft. 31,200 so, ft. Present zoning R_ 5. What do you propOse��lto develop on this property? We propose to construct a professional building for office and medical clinic space. • 6. The following information shall be submitted with this application: Scale A. Site and accessI;plan (include setbacks, existing structures, easements, and other factors :limiting development) . , . . . . 1" = 10' or 20 ' B. Parking, landscl4ping and screening plan .1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map . (include land use and zoning on adjacent panels) . . . . a a 1" = 200 ' - 800' D. Building heightliarld area (existing and proposed) E • A special permi required by the Renton Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordnance shall submit the information listed in Section .4 .23 7. 5 in , addition to the above . 7. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Date approved '; Date denied Date appealed o Appeal action Remarks i, Planning Dept . 2-73 revised 1-74 revised 1-75 • .ti ' I I' • ,. .,' . , ' . ,1'\' I, ' '' , • \l .I/fl 1 i . • , • . • f 1�4''' I' '' , •'' , • , r1 I • • ••• ;' ,/r' °fir. :" ''.0)d• ', o,; . • i • • • • • . . , ' , •' ,. . O J , 1 . • ; . k.4k\ ; f ' • . \, . . . . - ; • .)1 : ' i.,,\ .'? :•••'.; . • •• . • • . \ . ., \,,r.•/..„.,.... • • , "'I .I '. . • ' �j•fZ/✓ r • 1 • .. • , ` ` •,' •,,' )\ram 1 ________,: . \ , • --, ". 's : .'!. • ,'1.:.:V.; I. .." . ...-t:I. :., . • • • 0 ../°4(' ..r/ors f Legal Description of Parcel 32 D. • That portion of the Southwest quarter of Section 20 , Township 23 North , j . Range 5 East , W . M . , also being a portion of Parcel 32 as described in in - . struments recorded under Auditor ' s File No ' s , • 5959604 and 6150334 described j . : as follows : l Beginning at the northwest corner of said Southwest quarter ; thence i S 02 '06 ' 30" W along the 'lest line thereof 494 . 94 feet to the southerly • , 1 i ne of Puget Sound Power C. Light Company ' s 120 foot right -of-way , as , contained in ,instrument recorded under Audi tor ' s No . 5687370 . Thence Il 74 ° 32 ' 17 " E 297 . 53 feet to a point on the easterly line of Puget Drive , said 'point being the true point of beginning of said Parcel 32 ; thence S 1 6° 20 ' 40" E along said l i ne 669 . 42 feet to the true point of beginning ' •of the tract herein described ; thence N 73 3 ' 0'1 " E 130 .34 feet to a point on the westerly line of Benson Road , said line being that described in ; ;said Parcel 32 ; thence S 16° 16 ' 56 " E along said westerly lino 181 . 2. 2 feet ' ' to a point of curvature ; thence along said westerly line on a.. cu 'rve -Co the • , left ; the center of which bears N 73° 43 ' 04 '.' E and ' has a radius of 2294 . 93 feet , an arc distance of 1 8 . 78 feet through a central angle of 00° 22 ' 18 " ; thence S 73° 43 ' 04 " W 130 . 18 feet to a point on the easterly line of Puget • Drive ; thence N 1 6° 20 ' 40 " N along s oai d casterly line 200 , 00 feet to the , true point of beginning . ' . I Containing 0 . 597 acres more or 'less , sr.:'" EXHIBIT �' ' t IpP'l 1'.. I.1 i I I���,,,L', ' .....1 U o�/1'„)1 t'f.., ?A • • �, .� / / I r'hr l J /�c• / ,•,1 ) / �' �\ I , . <.,7-eti / .4>4 ///L,?/i/.•;:I:;�/�.'f ).." /..r' / ' l . y : :...: ...�.. !\, . ;'1 h., • ..,. .. ..,... _._. ., • .,,"4.: —(..,-.,•-.Coq (./0--2-1^"1 (1 , % . • . . . . .i'UluM 8o -R • • - • • 'ORDER N 0. l--ri ,? n V-f :' ' ESCROW NO. �` ----.� • LOAN NO, .— • • • MORTGAGOR PLAT MAP Vol PG • . - • . . (/ ,') • --- i :.is I) • :X . • . \\ ( O • 7. . . . ..'i' ' t • T4 . • • \ . •-• /'-..(. 7 )-. "--) • l�� 4j�1 • � II rJ I` 1 ' . \ . . . . • . . • CI1 • `,� \ `` c•) \w, O . c-_:) ,. „c„). ,\ � �.� \ \ • • • • • y J�..� 1 • . \\ . / fe • 1 • ` • .\ . \ I() , \ \ . • • , I, i.`1 mat, does not purport; to slic ; ,ia:J. hi,52.li‘,,nv;; . r0.,)(1 : r)1- on0r,,,,,,,,t•,. ., rr. - • • • Order. No. 420228 • • • • • DESCRIPTION • • • • • That portion of the Southwest '-4 of Section 20 , Township 23 North , Range 5 East , W.f. , also being a portion of Parcel 32 as described in instruments recorded under Auditor ' s File Nos . 5959604 and 6150334 described as follows : Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Southwest 4 ; Thence South 02°06 ' 3()" West along the West Line thereof 494 . 94 feet to the Southerly Line of Puget Sound Power Light Company ' s , 120 foot right-of-way , as contained in instrument recorded under Auditor ' s File No, 56873.70 ; Thence North 74 °32 ' 17" East 297..53 feet to a point on the Easterly. line of Puget Drive , said point being the true point of Beginning of said Parcel 32 ; Thence South 16°20 ' 40" East along said Line 669 . 42 feet ;. Thence North 73°43 ' 04" East 130 . 34 feet to a point on the Westerly Line of Benson Road, said line being that described in said Parcel 32 , said point being the true Point of Beginning of the tract herein described ; Thence South 73°43 ' 04" West 130 . 34 feet ; Thence North 16 ° 20 ' 40" West 200 feet ; • Thence North 73°43 ' 04" East to a poinit . on the Westerly Line of Benson Road ; Thence Southerly along said Westerly line ,to the true point of Beginning; • LESS, the Northerly 160 feet thereof. . Situate in the City of Renton , Cotnity of King , State of Washington. • • • EXHIBIT 6<> RECFII/�o�® CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON APR2 3975 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT WORKSHEET FOR OFFICE USE ONLY : �G DEPPR�� Application No . .�/ '- f9- 7z Negative Dec . • Date Received 3/ /7S EIS INSTRUCTIONS :.-,.. The. purpose of this information is to assist the vari - ous departments of the City to determine whethercan 'environmental impact statement will be required before approving and issuing a per- mit for a proposed project. Single family residential uses in non sensitive areas are . exempt _from__this requirement as established by • • Washington Administrative Code 173-34. • In addition to the following information , please submit a vicinity •map (recommend scale : 1" representing 200 ' to 800 ' ) and a site map (rec- ommend'ed scale : 1" representing 10 ' to 40 ' ) . APPLICANT TO PROVIDE INFORMATION REQUIRED - IN ITEMS 1. THROUGH 30 BELOW: 1 . Name of applicant INVEST WEST CORPORATION 2 . Mailing address 35 - S. Grady Way Renton, Washington Telephone 226 - 475o 3. Applicant is.: (lx1Owner [ iLessee I 1Contract purchaser l Other (specify ) 4. Name and address of owner , ff• other than applicant : Telephone 5 . General location of proposed project ( give street address if any or nearest street and intersection Parcel is north of the intersection of Puget Drive & Benson Rd. and lies between these two streets and adjacent to the Valley Ear, Nose & Throat Clinic. rt 11) 2 _ 6 . Legal description (if lengthy , attach as separate sheet) (ATTACHED) • 7 . Area 31,200 sa. ft. Dimensions 240 X 130 8. Intended use of property or project ( include details : number of units , volume , etc ..) : A two story 11,179 sq. foot professional office building. I - 9. Generally describe the property and existing improvements : The property is vacant land and is unimproved. • 10 . Total construction cost or fair market value of proposed project including additional developments contemplated : . Approximately $525,000.00 11 . Construction dates (month and year) for which permit is requested : Begin April 1975 End November 1975 4 - 3 - • 12 . List any other permits for this project from state, federal , or other local governmental agencies for which you have applied or will apply, including the name of the issuing agency, whether the • permit has been applied for , and if so , the date of the applica- tion , whether the application was approved or denied and the date of same , and, the number of the application or permit : . Date Agency Permit Type Submitted* Number Status** NONE • * Leave blank if not submitted. ** Approved , denied or pending . • 13 . Has an Environmental Impact Statement or an Environmental Assess- ment been prepared for the proposed project? �:l If "yes " submit copy with this �yes I1no environmental impact worksheet . 14. Are there similar projects , both public and private , existing or planned in the immediate area : x yes I lno don ' t know If "yes " explain .• The existing Valley Ear, Nose & Throat Clinic is adjacent next door and is a very similar development to the one we have planned. 15 . Is the proposed project located in or adjacent to an area or 'structure haying unique or 'exceptional"historic , cultural , or —other values considered important by some sectors of the popu- lation? yes tH° If "yes " explain . 16 . Is the proposed project located in an area that may be considered sensitive and is subject to erosion , landslides , floods , etc . ? yes I Xi no If "yes " explain . 4 - • 17 . Is the proposed project located in an area that has a number of large trees or other natural landscaped areas , waterways , marshes or wildlife? Eyes X- no If "yes" explain . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF PROPOSED PROJECT : In the following questions summarize what the applicant feels will be the environmental impact , both beneficial and adverse , of the proposed project . Consideration should be given to both the human and natural environmental as well as physical , social , and aesthetic aspect . For projects which are part of a more extensive plan , consider the implications of the entire plan and not just the project now being proposed . • 18,. Land Use : Will the project have a significant effect on land use in the surrounding area? • Iyes ix no Explain : • We feel this project will have a beneficial effect on surrounding land use but, we would hesitate to say that it would be of overwhelming significance. The building would definitely blend well with existing improvements of the surounding area. • • 19. Project Design and Appearance : Will the project 'design , appear- ance , landscaping , etc. , assure the maximum protection for the natural environment? • Ayes • Lino Explain : We have made every effort to provide landscaping that will enhance the effect of the building. We also will make every effort to save all available trees and native shrubs to insure the protection of the surrounding environment. 20 . Ground Contours : Does the proposed project have an effect on the existing ground contours of the project location? u yes [ilno . Is the project likely to cause erosion or sedimentation? I-1 yes x' no? If "yes" to either , explain . • - 5 - 21 . Air Quality: Will construction of the project and use of the completed project have a substantial effect on the existing air quality? (Consider the effect of any gas , chemicals , smoke , • dust , particulate matter , and odors ) ? (yes rilno If "yes " explain . • 22 . Water Quality: Will construction of the project and use of the completed project be likely to have an effect on the existing water quality of the area? (Consider the adequacy of drainage and runoff and the likely endpoint of any liquids draining from the project. ) [ j• yes X ,no . Is there a good possibility that this project will requir an expansion of local water and/or sewer facilities? 1 yes IXIno If "yes" to either , explain . 23 . Noise : Will construction of the project or use of the completed .project significantly ..-affect the existing noise levels of the area? e yes Tlno . Will the project be affected by airports , freeways , railroads or other sources of noise? • Ijyes i,x ono If "yes" to either , explain . 24 . Population Density : Will a noticeable population change result from this project? ( Consider the present density per acre in the surrounding community to the proposed density of the project and including daytime density . ) r ; yes CX ]no . Will the pro- ject cause periodic or temporary fluctuations in population due to tourism , employment , shopping , schools , etc . L__iyes [ Ono . If "yes " to either , explain . - 6 - 25 . Effect on Population : Will the proposed action directly or in- directly cause the relocation of a sizeable number of persons or the division or disruption of existing community patterns of liv- ing? L Iyes 'lino If "yes " explain . . t 26 . Schools and Parks : Will the proposed project have an effect on schools and parks in the area? yes no If "yes " explain . • 27 . Transportation : Will construction of the project or use of the completed project have a significant impact on transportation in the area? t---. r 1 ( yes CXIno Explain : The construction and use of the office building should not increase transportation problems in the area. The nature of of the building use would tend to minimize transportation impact.' 28. Public Use : Will the project be available for use by all sectors of the public? '_xl yes p no Explain : • The building will be convieniently located so that those services that are available in the building will be available to all sectors of the public. 29 . Other impacts : Identify any other beneficial or adverse environ- mental impacts which may result from the construction or comple- tion of the proposed project . The project will be a credit to the community in general. • - 7 - • 30 . VIEWS OF LOCAL GROUPS : Have you made your plans known to interested community 1.roups or neighbors in the vicinity of the project? rxl yes Jno If "yes" what are their reactions? If " no" do you intend to contact these people?[ l yes no We have talked with Dr. Maxwell of the Valley Ear, Nose & Throat Clinic about the project and their reaction to the project was favorable. • CERTIFICATION BY OWNER/REPRESENTATIVE The Owner/Representative identified in Item No . 1 or 4 above hereby certifies that the information furnished in this Environmental Work- sheet is true and accurate to the best of their knowledge . INVEST WEST CORPORATION PRESIDENT //7� Signature Title / D'ate 8 _ TO ''BE' FILLED TN BY 'CTT'' DEPARTMEnrTS (. REVIEW BY. OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :. _. Department: Comments : . I • Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date • REVIEW* Br OMER CITr DErARTMENTS : Department:_, Comments : —r(o Si ature of Director or Authorized Representative Date • REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 6.F4/6/C Comments : A__/0 er-e—fr • • 7 • ----gignature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 7 . • - 10 - ACTION BY RES?ONSIBLE OFFICIAL A. Staff review determined that project: Has no significant environmental impact and application should be processed without further consideration of environmental effects . • May have significant environmental impact and a complete environmental assessment should be prepared by applicant prior to further action on request for permit. B. Reasons for above conclusion : • OF wNI�G C)� . I Signature of Responsible Official or Authorized Representative Date : Form : EIS-1 Planning Department October 15 , 1973 . , . . ... . . . , • . • ri / •e!') . . ' ,.. , . 'i. \I ' 1. ''1 1... . 1 • t. • . . • . . . • • . • . . , I I I .'I ' . . . , .. .. • o. '.;.'• ' N\k I • , .,• .. • , , . • . . ,. . . .. . . . .,.. . ,.N.\. , ,N . ! . ' • ‘ • N.N . . , .., • • • , I . .. • . ' • . ,... '' • •• . • .. .1 • ' k:------- . .•,'• • .':.:,'•::'•'•. 1. . '. .'• ..''' . ., '' ... , " ' .. , . • 7, ... • i • . • .. . • r t , I ' ,...g, '// , • , •,..' •:"..•';' • • • , '• ' ' •' . • . ••-•" . . . . . 47/ . • ' . ::,' . . • • 7A4 ; ,• .', . ......,', . . :'. . i ., .,,....., . 1. tO/r •\ !% . • ..:, ...•'. '.. • • ,;,"! i ! i 1)...../..?2'........ .. • • 0 • I /j.,. • II . • /I/7,.L''• /,'' 31 . ... ' ';') ‘•. :.. .\ • ... . :.:;: . : • 1..1%:. .4.1 . ..• I i • . • : . . • .I. .: °,.I I .9a .........,......,,..... , / V:. . . „:... '. .; . ... . ' I I ..N.. I .•• •r • • • I I • . a • •• 4. . i.. • • ' 4 ' . ‘,.. •-•-• ' \ S \ ..• . • ll\...;I. ' • • ll* . .1 ' • ..—. .4.47e„?. :'.''„:::,...y.4:• .H,.: .... ,' 1". ' , '' . ' . • • I • \ •. . • .•• ' • ..• • . . . ‘ . ,, ; . , • •1 • • • t • . • ' r'I ' I • • • i \,.., , .. , . . . • •. ' P ' • • . ' •\ ' . . i•'i.: . ' • , ... ‘' ' • • c\,,Ist, •1 ••••' 'I cl,..„. .. : \ • . • •••„. • -.1 • • • • , . : ;.: . .1/4.„„0„ .,,„z . [:•:i • ' . r•1 •• I C. .. • . . .. \ ; . .1.\ - '•<. •') ; ;.•:! • •IC2a/i -C:e/112 22 '.''V.:" . 1 . Th ' • 1. : . • • : ,.. : N.,. ; • • / t 4' Z-7.el oZOrIZ;6.7.5-7j /// ' - . .. 4 .- k'' •• • I • •''. : k •I .H! • '\' -, • ' ••.• ;••••' . e . . . • • I . • • . . . • . I. • . . . p • • ••••••••. •• , ••• • • •• • , • - • • 1 • . . . .. • . .• • ;• . . :1 ..;,. \•f•ig -,-.‘s \ • • ...• . •• ' \--. . • . • ' • ••,,r ,,..-. • ... . . .. "..-- " . '''' •.. . 41x co-2,2 //..-7'' . -0- :. e•=---- • 1 ,,,, •,, • '--...„, -- - 4•-•\ tN /1,2, • : . • '',,. '• \ - ••.•.... '::. ? :. .••. ' ••• ...4/4'././.7 Ar ' ' •. . ''•) . `. ; i I % •:•,';.•:', , • • . . . . . . I •' . •1. : \ ••,_ .. • • . • , . •!• , ., :% 4, I'•... !.:•...:..' . . ,.1 • .• /..-!.,...- „1 yr a •••• . , ,. , •.• . . ,.....--- . ,,i) v. . .:• . .. .; •: ' • : " i • •:„....:.: f/./ . ./. .. ... . ': . - • • • •- , •• • : . . • • 1 • . .. • •. . . • . ,. • • • . .. • .••. ., i • . . . . . .....- • . - . . .. . . . . , • . . . ... . . • , • .• • i • .• . . ,.... . . . •L . . . . .. I . „ • . • .*. ' •• . .. 1 , • . . , ,t • *, . . • . . • * , . I. . . . . ' .::••• .• * „.. p ./671 ..7;-‘2,--, /2?",•::: 1 • • . . . • . 1 1 . . , . .•• .. ,.., . ' . . , . . • ' . . . . ' • . • • • . . • • . , . : :• . . . 6 1 . ., . . .• . . . • 1 • ' • . . ;. . l Description, • Legal Parcel 32 D . .. . ; . . . • . . That portion of tfte Southwest quarter of Section 20 , Township 23 North) Range 5 East , W . M , , also being a portion of Parcel 32 as described ill struments recorded under Auditor ' s File No ' s ; 5959604 and 61503 '.34 described I . : as follows : . . • . Beginning at the northwest corner of said Southwest .quarter ; thence • S 02 °0E30" W along the West line thereof 494 . 94 feet to the southerly , line of Puget Sound Power & Light Company ' s 120 foot right-of-way , as contained in .instrument recorded under Auditor ' s No , 5627370 , Thence 1 N 74 ° 32 ' 17" E 297 . 53 feet to a point on the easterly line of Puget Drive , ! 1 said ' point being the true point of beginning of said Parcel 32 ; thence I ..• S 16° 20 ' 40" E along said line 669 . 42 feet to the true point of beginning ' .of the tract herein described ; thence N 73°43 ' 01 " E 130 . 34 feet to a point 1 on the westerly line of Benson Road , said line being that described in 1 i , : said Parcel 32 ; thence S- 16 ° 16 ' 56 " E along said westerly lino 181 . 22 feet . ' to a poin.t of curvature ; thence along said westerly line on a curve to the I , left , the center of which bears N 73 °43 ' 04 " E and has a radius of 2294 . 93 feet , an arc distance of 18 . 18 feet through a central angle of 00° 22 ' 18 " ; i thence S 73° 43 ' 04 " W 130 . 18 feet to a point on the easterly line of Puget ! Drive ; thence N 16° 20 ' 40" W along said easterly line 200 . 00 feet to the , true point of beginning . . I . , • , A Containing 0 , 597, acres more or less .„, . i. . ,,,.... . EXHIBIT ,,,• c. ••••.‘. .• • ili'•\ %-. ""i/N'I-, - I ,,•,(1 O. °I/4).\•)„: , ' i . A;•;''')/-' / ,/'-'i. ,;% ; lle:// ' "'/•;•;•? .4.-/ / .',4/ /i e.'•:>, (....,, , ... ry.•,) /•,t'.• r: ,, 6..\,:-..\k, I I I II . " / •• I (1rj•: Cl" (42'I*t'";:f• .;I:". . . (4./1.,"*7 (17::.2/ye .7).,/ • I :,.-.N 1 . ' " :' ; ' ' •-, / ,'• ‘• ••.) .7 '.17 I (. r4.r , r i I...!,),"i',.,r', o'e' e,' ,..,41'(../...-...:,' .!I II. ,J r M Order. No. 420228 • • • DESCRIPTION • • That portion of the Southwest '-4 of Section 20 , Township 23 North , Lange 5 East , I'1.N. , also being; a portion of Parcel 32 as described in instruments . recorded under Auditor ' s File Nos . 5959604 and 6150334 described as follows : Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Southwest 'a ; Thence South 02°06 ' 30" West along the West Line thereof n:)n . 94 feet to the Southerly Line of Puget Sound Power £, Light Company ' s , 120 foot right-of-way , as contained in instrument recorded under Auditor ' s File No. 5687370 ; Thence ;forth 74 °32 ' 17" East 297 . 53 feet to a point on the Easterly_ line of Puget Drive , said point being the true Point of Beginning of said Parcel 32 ; Thence South 16°20 ' 40" East along said Line 669 , 42 feet ; Thence North 73°43 ' 04" East 130 . 34 feet to a point on the Westerly Line of Benson Road, said line being that described in said Parcel 32 , said point being the true Point of Beginning of the tract herein described ; Thence South 73°43 ' 04" West 130 . 34 feet ; Thence North 16°20 ' 410" West 200 feet ; Thence North 73°43 ' 04" East to a point on the Westerly Line of Benson Road ; Thence Southerly g aloe said Westerly line to the true point of Beginning LESS, the Northerly 160 feet thereof. . Situate in the City of Renton , County' of King, State of Washington. • EXHIBIT iS L ��..CC.�7 •(, i _ / ', . • • . .ORDER NO, /,_ ,.? n -.2 : .' ESCROW NO, ��"---...._.... • LOAN NO. .— • .• • .• .. . . MORTGAGOR PLAT MAP Vol PG • • • ( 7,2) •.1.e ) 11 . • ' (9° • . . . . • ,n •• 924//T ' • • . . • ,,,../:•c ,. -, — . e —,_, ,....,,.., • . . . . ......, ,s ... . . ., . . . 4.,4 . . • • • . . , r...7i), ...., . • fl . .\ . . :I.'l • . . \_- . • • • A . • • \ \ ‘\ si.: . .. \ 'C'S. • . q ''... . . . . ' .\ . . . \ '1 t ` . \ • • • t-----: • _ice • ��� \ • . . . • \ -. .....-----: • . \ . . • • • \ ' () \ • 1 • • AFFIDAVIT • I, INVEST WEST CORPORATION , being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner, of the property involved in t)iis application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this i day of diVt,ef./.. , 19 7. .-., . Notary Public in and .for the State of Washington, residing at /.�E,1/T . - INVEST. WEST CORPORATION (Name of Notary Public) (Signature of Owner) ,iIZIZ 5 G 2/2 ;sr. �c A1� �e 35 - S. Grady Way, Renton, Washington (Address) (Address) • • Renton Wash. . (City) (State) ' . see . 226 4750 • (Telephone) . (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) • CERTIFICATION This is to certiffy— - • the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been fo 'E orough and complete in every particular and to conform to th 2Qi d1 ulations of the Renton Planning Department , governing th � i �l soh application . 1915 Date Receiv � R 2 , 19 By: 'Ur A .. ""'r am- ,�� \NG DC_X Renton Planning Dept . —I 2-73 ROUTE SCHEDULE PLANNING DEPARTMENT ,. DATE ROUTED4 9 PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR; REZONE MAJOR PLAT SITE APPROVAL SHORT PLAT - S12.-75 SPECIAL PERM ' Vv WAIVER SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT OR EXEMPTION AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT I , WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE, BEFORE SIGNATURE OR INITIAL DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DENIAL DATE -- ' ILDING - -�l�j--7� RAFFIC ENG. --7 5o la 'j, FNGINEERIN - 4- /7- FIRE HEALTH 1:LVIE'.,ER`S COMMENTS OR APPROVAL CONDITIONS : /.2414 • C APPLICATION : SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICANT : INVEST WEST CORPORATION LOCATION : Property located on Puget Drive between Puget Drive and Benson Road South . ZONING : R-4 APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE 4-702 ; 4-708 ; 4-722 ; 4-729 ZONING CODE : REQUEST : Applicant requests a special permit to con- struct a professional office in an existing R-4 zone. COMMENTS : 1, The site slopes 20-25% from Benson Road South down to Puget Drive . Parking , ingress , egress and isle slopes excessive . 2 . Access on Benson Road considering the high traffic volume and the steep topo- graphic conditions is questionable. 3. Landscaping is desirable along Benson Road and on the north and south property lines . 4. Two more parking stalls must be provided . Fifty four stalls are shown and fifty six are required. 5 . Revised plan to be submitted by applicant . j STAFF RECOMMENDATION : Recommend approval subject to : 1 . Limiting access to Puget Drive only. 2 . Staff approval of detailed landscape plan including additional width and materials along Benson Road and Puget Drive and the north and south property lines . 3 . Staff approval of revised site plan in view of excessive slopes of parking areas and ingress/egress . 4 . Posting of a bond for 150% of the land- scaping installation and a three year maintenance period . 5 . Staff approval of slope retention methods . NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION RENTON , WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION AT ITS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON APRIL 23 , 19 75 , AT 8 : 00 P . M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . REZONE FROM G-7200 TO R-2 , file No . R-805-75 ; property located on Union Ave . N . E. between N . E . 15th St. and Glencoe Subdivision . 2. REZONE FROM G-960p TO L-1 , file No . R-809-75 ; property located on East Valley Highway adjacent to SR- 167 and approximately 1/4 to 1/2 mile north of S . W. 43rd St . 3. REZONE FROM G TO M-P , file No . R-810-75 ; property located on E . Valley Highway between SW 21st St . and SW 23rd St. 4. REZONE FROM G-7200 TO R-2 , file No . R-811-75 ; property located on Sunset Highway, P . S . H . 2 between Union Ave . and 138th . 4' 5 . SPECIAL PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A PROFESSIONAL OFFICE AND MEDICAL CLINIC FACILITY IN R-4 ZONE , file No . SP-812-75 ; property located on Puget Drive between Puget Drive and Benson Road So . 6 . SPECIAL PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT APARTMENTS IN AN R-2 ZONE , file No . SP-813-75 ; property located on Sunset Highway between Union Ave . and 138th . 7 . WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS IN G-6000 ZONE ; file No . W-814-75 ; property located between N . E . 24th St. and N. E. 26th St. west of 14th Ave. N . E . 8. WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS IN G-7200 ZONE ; file No . W-815-75 ; property located between N . E . 16th St. and N. E. 12th St. and Jones Ave . to the west . ALL PERSONS INTERESTED OR OBJECTING TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ON APRIL 23 , 1975 AT 8 : 00 P . M. TO VOICE THEIR PROTESTS OR OBJECTIONS TO SAME . LARRY GIBSON , SECRETARY PUBLISHED APRIL 13 , 1975 RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATION I William T. Turner , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn to before me , a Notary Public , SIGNED 2 c0-r--, //e,c,v ,\ on the 10thday of April , 19 75. c 2 Y Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ss. "arba rn Oarin,sr:ne, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that isheis the c'hi cf cirri, of THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a tri-weekly newspaper. That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for - - more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, 5.SPECIAL PERMIT TO CON- printed and published in the English language continually as a tri- STRUCT A PROFESSIONAL weekly newspaper in Renton, King County, Washington, and it is now OFFICE AND MEDICAL and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the CLINIC FACILITY IN R-4 aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper. That the Renton ZONE, file No. SP-812-75; Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of property located on Puget the Superior Court of the County in which it is published, to-wit, King Drive between Puget Drive and County, Benson Road So. 6.SPECIAL PERMIT TO CON- Washington.That the annexed is a not. public heLr:i.rsr_ STRUCT APARTMENTS IN AN R-2 ZONE,file No.SP-813- •75;property located on Sunset re E e oni n«S • Highway between Union Ave. and 138th. 7.WAIVER OF OFF-SITE tM- as it was published in regular issues (and PROVEMENTS IN G-6000 not in supplement form of said newspaper)once each issue for a period NOTICE OF PUBLIC ZONE; file No. .W 814-75; HEARING property located between N.E. RENTON PLANNING 24th St.and N.E.26th St.west of OflC consecutive issues, commencing on the COMMISSION of 14th Ave.N.E. RENTON,WASHINGTON 8.WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IM- ' day of +`^ril , 19 75 , and ending the - HELD BY THE RENTON PLAN- ZONE; file No. W-815-75; NING COMMISSION AT ITS REG- property located between N.E. ULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL 16th St.and N.E.12th St.and day of , 19 , both dates CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, Jones Ave.to the west. inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON ALL PERSONS INTERESTED subscribers during all of said period.That the full amount of the fee APRIL 23, 1975,AT 8:00 P.M.TO OR OBJECTING TO SAID CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE rf.l1� PETITIONS: PRESENT AT THE PLANNING 2charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of$ , which I.REZONE FROM G-7200 TO R- COMMISSION MEETING ON has been paid in full at the rate ofper folio of one hundred words 2: file No. R-805-75; property APRIL 23, 1975 AT 8:00 P.M.TO located on Union Ave.N.E.be- VOICE THEIR PROTESTS OR 08- for the first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each tween N.E. 15th St. and JECTIONS TO SAME. subsequent insertion. _` Glencoe Subdivision LARRY GIBSON, l 2.REZONE FROM G-9600 TO L- SECRETARY 1,.file No. R-809-75; property RENTON PLANNING (-..�• y;v-4„4/(L )( %K located on East Valley Highway COMMISSION, "'�77��� adjacent to SR-167 and published in the Renton Record- C•j ief CLEF!' approximately 1/4 to 1/2 mile Chronicle April 13, 1975.R3186. north of S.W.43rd St. • 3.REZONE FROM G TO M-P,file No.R-810-75;property located Subscribed and sworn.to before me this 1 II day of on E.Valley Highway between SW 21st St.and SW 23rd St. n,y, 75 4.REZONE FROM G-7200TOR- 19 2,file No.IR-811-75;property located on Sunset Highway 41 ?� --, P.S.H.2 between'Union Ave. Q" ¢y� and 138th. Notary P • in and for the State of Washington, _—__ r: . ng at Renton,King County. r,70 t~ '- - —Passed by the Legislature, 1955, known as Senate Bill 281, effective yf rg../[R'L�l '\\\ June 9th,1955. s--',t —Western Union Telegraph Co.rules for counting words and figures, ' , „ = .: j l adopted by the newspapers of the State. .\\•vJ, �4A 4-2 n A ®F ?► Cj / Fg.ANNIN(3 DEPARTMENT • RENTON,WASHING'd`ON j t1�7 MUNICIPAL BUILDING • RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 • 235-2550 0 {p. °q � MEMORANDUM r-D sEp� August 6 , 1975 TO : Files FROM: Michael Smith , Assistant Planner SUBJECT : Invest West Special Permit #SP-812-75 Bill Turner and I talked today with the architects for Invest West . We reviewed the conditions of the Planning Commission approval and the letter to Invest West dated April 30 , 1975 outlining those conditions . We reviewed their revised grading plan , and felt that the parking lot on the north side of the building should be regraded to 10% or less with a rock retaining wall and landscaping at the east end of it . They said they would explore this possibility . The remaining areas appeared to be acceptable in terms of slope. All steep slopes will be retained by rock wall , with lesser slopes controlled by appropriate groundcover. We reviewed our comments on their previous landscape plan . They said they would provide the proper land- scape area widths per the April 30 , 1975 letter , install combination trees , shrubs , and groundcover in all planting areas , provide proper landscape screening adjacent to Benson Road and the south property line , proper erosion control me.thods . save as much existing trees as possible , prepare a suit- able sprinkler plan , and provide a landscaping and maintenance bond for the project . We also discussed the need for drainage retention and oil -water separ- ation . We indicated that if we have a bond for the landscaping and the revisionto the site and grading plans are shown we could approve a building permit application subject to staff approval of detailed landscape plans . MLS : kh ._. ., , i THE CITY OF RENTON ,.; c',e MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 O � pA AVERY GARRETT, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 235 - 2550 114, Fo SEPSE�� April 30 , 1975 Invest West Corporation 35 - South Grady Way Renton , Washington 98055 RE : Special Permit Approval of a Professional Office Building in an R-4 Zone ; SP-812-75 Gentlemen : Your Special Permit application to construct a professional office building in an R-4 zone has been approved by the Renton Planning Commission . The issuance of the special permit is subject to conditions that must be accomplished prior to the issuance of a building permit . As per our meeting of April 29 , 1975 with Mr . Rendahl , Invest West Corporation , Mr . Neilson and Mr. Smith , Nielson and Smith Architects, Planners , the following issues and conditions of the Special Permit were discussed : 1 . Limiting access to Puget Drive only until such time as a left hand turn lane is provided on Benson Road South . The intent of this condition is to eliminate danger- ous left turn situations on Benson Road South , not to eliminate right turn situations . It is possible that access onto Benson Road might be possible only if a suitable solution is achieved provided the access road does not have a grade in excess of 5% to 10% , and access to Benson Road South reaches road grade a mini - mum of 28 feet from the center line of Benson Road South . 2 . Staff approval of detailed landscape plan including , but not limited to , additional width and materials along Benson Road and Puget Drive and along the north and south property lines . Invest West Corporation April 30 , 1975 Page Two A ten foot wide landscape area will be required along the south property line . A minimum of a five foot wide landscaping area will be required along Benson Road South together with additional landscaping and screening materials within the public right-of-way between the property line and street curb to supple- ment the existing natural vegetation . A minimum ten foot landscaping strip along the north property line will be required . Additional groundcover will be required in the landscape areas as well as automatic • sprinklers and hose bibs . : 3 . Staff approval of revised site plan in view of exces- sive slopes of parking area and ingress/egresss area . The grades in the parking area will be limited to 5% to 10% maximum. 4 . Posting of a bond for 150% of the landscape install - ation and a three year maintenance period . 5 . Staff approval of slope retention methods . 6 . The Utilities and Engineering Departments will require additional drainage facilities and oil /water separators will be required as per the Parking and Loading Ordinance . - 7 . The final landscape plan is to be submitted and approved by the Planning Department with the sprinkler system to be indicated on the plan . We would like to resolve these questions with you as soon as possible in order to expedite the issuance of a building permit. If you have any immediate questions , please feel free to call Mike Smith , Joan Lankford or the undersigned 'at 235-2550 . • Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen Planning Director 44 William C . Turn Planning Technician WCT :mas 11F 14fe y6 THE CITY OF. RENTON z o MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 0 AVERY GARRETT, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT p (07 Ao (4 235 - 2550 �ATfD SEP���'3 April 24 , 1975 MEMORANDUM TO : Files FROM : Willis Roberts RE : Notes - Staff Meeting , 4/24/75 , Planning Commission Meeting Review PRESENT : G . Ericksen , J . Lankford , M. Smith, W . Turner, W. Roberts The Planning Commission public hearing of 4/23/75 was reviewed as follows : • ROBERT C . JACKSON - REZONE Rezone from G-7200 to R-2 approved by Planning Commis- sion with restrictions to be placed in restrictive covenant form to create a buffer of natural landscaping on the north property line . J . Lankford will conduct site inspection to actually determine 25 ' and 30 ' line. ( Can be done with Bill . ) Concerns to be addressed : setback of building struc- tures , preservation of natural landscaping (may include additional plantings ) and maintenance ; time-frame for construction ( suggested 25 years - 2000) ; covenants to run with the land. When prepared , contact Jackson for approval . SHOULD GO TO COUNCIL BY MAY 5 BUT CAN BE LATER. DO NOT SEND TO COUNCIL UNTIL COVENANTS ARE COMPLETE.. Note : Check subdivision also . • DR. H . M. ALLENBACH - REZONE Rezone from G-9600 to L-1 approved by Planning Commis- sion . Questions with regard to location of P-9 Channel . LETTER TO COUNCIL BY MAY 5 . TIDE CITY OF RENTON • MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o o ,� AVERY GARRETT, MAYOR ® PLANNING DEPARTMENT 235 - 2550 O�qP fB SEPlt��� April 9, 1975 MEMORANDUM TO: Files • FROM: Joan A. Lankford RE: Special Use Permit in R-4 Zone Invest West Corporation SP-812-75 � s Mike Smith, Bill Turner and I met today with Marritt Neilson and James Rendahl on the above mentioned project. The fol- lowing items were discussed: 1. The access to Benson Highway is at excessive grade and could cause problems regarding entrance into the traffic lanes in addition to conflict with left turing movements. If access is allowed form Benson, it should not line up with access from Puget Drive. 2. The entire parking area grade exceeds recommended standards. • •Mr. Rendahl and Mr. Smith indicated that _they would revise the contour plan after they had done further study on the site and finalized the building location. 3. The landscaped strip on the south line is to be a minimum of five feet in width. The landscape strip on the north property line is to be a minimum of ten feet in width. Both planting strips are to incorporate- trees and scrubs for screening purposes. 4. The landscape strip adjacent to Benson Highway is to be a minimum of five feet and the area between the property line and Benson is to be landscaped and incorporate existing vegetation. Trees and scrubs to provide screening and buffering are to be planted. :i ii Renton Planning Commission Meeting April 9 , 1975 Page Three REZONE - SPECIAL PERMIT: C, C. H. G. INTERNATIONAL , INC. ; Appl . No . R-811-75 ; rezone from G-7200 to R-2 ; property 'located on Sunset Highway P . S . H . 2 between Union and 138th C. H. G. INTERNATIONAL , INC. ; App'l . No . SP-813-75 ; special permit for the construction of apartments in an R-2 zone ; property located on Sunset Highway between Union and 138th St. The Planning Director pointed out the approximate 12 acre site presently zoned single family residential on the vicinity map and noted that the applicant requests R-2 zoning with the intention of construction of single story multiple family residential dwellings . The Com- prehensive Plan designates the area as commercial and medium density residential use. Surrounding development in the vicinity was described . Mr. Ericksen noted that the 560 ' x 1 ,000 ' site has an existing home on it . Two accesses to the property were noted. The plan includes construction of 148 single story units . Twenty-five percent land coverage is proposed with the remaining area planned for parking , open space , and community facilities . Planned setbacks exceed single family requirements . The Planning Director described the character of the development as Northwest styling and displayed elevation drawings of the proposed structures . • Commissioner Teegarden requested that a perspective drawing of the development be provided by the architect . Responding to Commissioner Humble ' s inquiry , Mr. Erick- sen indicated the units are intended for rental rather than sale . It was also requested that comments from the Fire and Traffic Departments be obtained relative to access and that the impact upon adjacent residential areas to the north and west be determined . Commissioner Wik requested information with regard to development standards of the firm. -*SPECIAL PERMIT: D. INVEST WEST CORPORATION ; Appl . No . SP-812-75 ; spe- cial permit to construct a professional office and medical clinic facility in R-4 zoning ; property located on Puget Drive between Puget Drive and Benson Road So. The Planning Director noted the site adjacent to the Valley Ear Nose and Throat Clinic located between Puget Drive and Benson Road . The subject property , . 72 acre , is presently vacant , located in an R-4 zone and requires Planning Commission review in terms of special approval of the development of a professional office/medical clinic . Mr. Ericksen described the proposed central office structure , parking and access , and landscaping . Access problems to the site were discussed . Elevation drawings of the two-story. structures were viewed , and plans for landscaping , adjustments for grade , and the possibility of off-site improvements were discussed. Renton Planning Commission Meeting April 9 , 1975 Page Four WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS : E. L. JAMES KEFFER; Appl . No . W-814-75; waiver of off-site improvements for "KEFFER.' S FOUR SITES" short subdivision;, property located between N. E. 24th St. and N. E. 26th St. ' west of 14th Ave . N. E. The two acre site located, in the lower Kennydale area was noted by the Planning Director., The property will be' divi - ded into four building sites for single family, residential , use. Plans are to provide a half-street which will be 'a public right-of-way . A waiver with reference to curbs , gutters , and sidewalks is being requested. Discussion followed with particular reference to public ' access and the steep topographical characteristics of the site and adjoining area . It was requested by Commissioner Teegarden that the proposal be reviewed by the Fire Depart- ment . WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS: F. LYLE L. PICKLE ; Appl . No. W-815-75 ; waiver of off-site improvements for Lyle L. Pickle short subdivision ; property located between N. E. 16th St. and N . E. 12th St. , and Jones Ave .. to th'e west. The two and a half acre site in the Kennydale area' overlook- ing the Boeing Renton complex was noted by the Planning, j,' Director. It is planned that the site will, be divided into , , , four irregularly shaped lots . Topographical conditions of , ,., the property. were described.. A waiver of off-site improve- ments has 'been requested due to a lack of those improve- ' ' ments in the neighborhood . Discussion ' followed with regard , to access from Jones Ave . and. N . E . '12th St. It was noted . that a short plat application .has 'also . been" submitted in connection with the request. 4. ADMINISTRATIVE : A. COMMITTEE REPORTS 1 . COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Commissioner Humble , Community Development Committee' Chairman , advised that th'e Committee had met on April 7 with reference to the Comprehensive Plan in the Green , River Valley and proposed revisions to R-1 zoning, .re- quirements . Co-chairman Teegarden reported 'that the. staff is think- ing in terms of obtaining a 'draft revision of the entire.. Zoning Ordinance prior to submitting it for review by the Commission as a whole. The Committee will continue to work with them on each section as it is reviewed . The single family sections have been reviewed, and indus- trial zones will be studied next. He announced that . the next Committee meeting will be held at. '7 : 30 p. m. , April 30th , with regard to the Comprehensive Plan in the Green River Valley . 2 . ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Co-chairman Scholes advised that the Committee will meet on April 17 to discuss the Jackson rezone and hope to report back on April 23rd . Files April 7 , 1975 Page Two 5. Ground cover is to be plan ted in all summer planting areas including underplanting of the Rhodadendrum and Azalea areas. 6. Sidewalk location is to be determined by Public Works adjacent to Puget Drive and the remaining area is to be landscaped. 7 . Parking provided is two stalls less than the ordinance requires. Property' to the north is owned by the applicant and the additional area needed for landscape buffers can be shifted to the north. The applicants indicated that they would request a waiver of off-site improvements for the sidewalk along Benson Highway upon further inspection of the site, location of larger existing trees will be noted and will try to be incorporated in the parking layout. This may cause further deficiency in the parking provided. We advised the appli- cants, that any request for lesser parking density would require concurrence with the Board of Adjustment. JAL:rh { • • INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM DATE: April 23, 1975 TO: Planning Department FROM: Dave Hamlin, Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: Special Use Permit Application - Invest-West Corporation (Driveways) We have reviewed the plans as submitted by Invest-West for the construction of a business center on Puget Drive. The driveways as proposed on Puget Drive are shown in a manner that will provide proper and safe access and egress. The driveway as shown on the latest submittal (received 4/22/75) which would connect the parking lot to Benson Road would be acceptable from the standpoint of safety if: 1. The grade of the driveway is in the range of 5 - 10%. 2. The driveway reaches street grade at a minimum of 28 feet from the centerline of Benson Road. This would be the back edge of a sidewalk if and when Benson Road is eventually widened and improved. ° 4611\1\ David I. Hamlin DIH:ad Renton Planning Commission Meeting April 23, 1975 Page Nine In response to questioning by Commissioner Scholes with regard to possible regrading , the Planning Director noted the grades proposed. Discussion ensued with reference to the proposed access from Benson Road . Existing traffic on Benson was reviewed and potential problem areas noted. The Chairman invited comment from the applicant. James Rendahl , representing Invest West , 35 South Grady Way , Renton , stated that he wished to address the ques- tion of access . He said the site includes 400 feet of frontage on both Puget Drive and Benson Road . Develop- ment is planned in two stages . He described plans for the ramp-like access off Benson Road on the north side of the property . He stated that they feel it is re- quired to serve anticipated future development. He discussed proposed landscaping and noted that the area will be screened by existing trees on the site . Mr. Rendahl said they would work with the staff to resolve any problems with regard to access and landscaping . The Chairman reuqested input from the Commission . In reply to Commissioner Slough relative to the immediate need for access from Benson , Mr . Rendahl stated that it is planned to serve both properties , and it is their feeling it will create less congestion onto Puget Drive . He indicated that they would like to have freedom of traffic movement and believe it can be done with a mini - mal effect on Benson Road. Commissioner Scholes pointed out the possibility of flow-through traffic . Mr. Rendahl indicated that they were aware of this potential problem. Further discussion followed regarding the Benson Road access , with Commissioner Gibson noting no provisions for left turns on Benson Highway with a resulting dan- gerous condition , and it was suggested that left-turn movements be restricted . The Chairman called for additional comments from the audience , but none were received. Noting sufficient concern by the Commission and staff, IT WAS ACTION: MOVED BY TEEGARDEN, SECONDED BY GIBSON, THAT THE MATTER BE CONTINUED UNTIL THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S ADMINISTRA- TIVE MEETING ON MAY 14 , 1975 . Mr. Rendahl indicated that he would like to avoid a continuance , noting economic problems and stating that they would be happy to work out the details with the staff. Discussion followed with special emphasis on the access from Benson Road and the possibility of the applicant confining ingress/egress to Puget Drive . It was noted that the Traffic Engineer did not consider it a critical problem and possibly certain conditions regarding the access could be established . It was further noted that a public hearing on the Comprehensive Plan as it relates to the Green River Valley is planned for May 14th . Renton Planning Commission Meeting April 23 , 1975 Page Ten Noting his feeling that the special permit could be approved subject to limiting access to Puget Drive only , Commissioner Gibson withdrew his second to the motion . Following further discussion on the issue , Commissioner Scholes seconded the motion by Commissioner Teegarden to continue the item until May 14th . On the question , a roll call vote was requested with the fol - lowing results : MOLA - AYE RIVILY - AYE ROSS - NO SCHOLES - AYE SLOUGH - NO WIK - NO GIBSON - NO MOTION FAILED. ACTION: MOVED BY SCHOLES, SECONDED BY GIBSON, THAT THE SPECIAL PERMIT BE APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1 . LIMITING ACCESS TO PUGET DRIVE ONLY UNTIL SUCH TIME AS LEFT HAND TURN LANES ARE PROVIDED ON BENSON ROAD. 2 . STAFF APPROVAL OF THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. 3 . POSTING OF A PERFORMANCE BOND FOR 150% OF LAND- SCAPING INSTALLATION AND, MAINTENANCE FOR A THREE YEAR PERIOD. 4 . STAFF APPROVAL OF SLOPE RETENTION METHODS. 5. STAFF APPROVAL OF REVISED SITE PLAN IN VIEW OF EXCESSIVE SLOPES OF PARKING AREAS AND INGRESS/ EGRESS. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS: E. L . JAMES KEFFER; Appl . No . W-814-75 ; waiver of off-site improvements for " KEFFER ' S FOUR SITES" short subdivision ; property located between N . 24th St . and N . 26th St . , west of 14th Ave . N . E . The application for waiver of off-site improvements was intro- duced to the Commission by Secretary Gibson . The Planning Director noted the site located in the lower Kennydale area on the vicinity map . Access is via N . 24th St . , which is a partial street into a cul de sac to serve four lots . This would be a dedicated right-of-way . A waiver has been re- quested of installation of curbs , gutters , and sidewalks due to the absence of similar improvements in the general - area . Assistant Planner Smith advised that the Engineering Depart- ment has reviewed both the short plat proposal and waiver questions and they have indicated approval of the waiver of off-site improvements . Z-nVest Renton Planning Commission Meeting April 23 , 1975 Page Eight Discussion ensued with regard to the possibility of consider- ing both applications simultaneously , preservation of the evergreen trees on the site , appropriateness of restrictive covenants attached to the rezone application , location of buffering zones , and possible revisions to the proposed con- struction plan with consideration for the neighboring home owners ' recommendations . Noting the need for further study , IT WAS • ACTION: MOVED BY SCHOLES, SECONDED BY MOLA, THAT THE C.H.G . INTER- NATIONAL, INC. REQUEST FOR REZONE FROM G-7200 TO R-2 BE CONTINUED AND THE MATTER BE REFERRED TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE FOR REVIEW AND REPORT BACK AT THE MAY 28, 1975, PUBLIC HEARING. Mr. Dininger spoke in opposition to continuation 'of the rezone request and indicated preference for restrictions on the special permit. There was further discussion with reference to the require- ment for an environmental impact assessment, its relation- ship to the rezone and special permit applications , and the time-frame for its review. On the question , MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Commissioner Mola , Chairman of the Environmental Develop- ment Committee , called for a meeting to be held May 7 , at 7 : 30 p . m. It was decided that the C . H . G . International , Inc. special permit should also be reviewed at the May 7th Committee meeting . The Chairman declared a recess at 10: 25 p . m. The meeting was reconvened at 10: 37 p . m. with, all members noted above as being in attendance . SPECIAL PERMIT: D. INVEST WEST CORPORATION ; Appl . No . SP-812-75'; . special permit to construct a professional office and medical clinc facility in R-4 zoning ; property located on Puget Drive between Puget Drive and Benson Road So . The application for special permit was introduced by Secre- tary Gibson at the request of the Chairman . A presentation was requested from the staff. The Planning Director noted the location of . 7 acre R-4 zoned site on Puget Drive in the vicinity of Benson Road northerly of the Maxwell Clinic . Mr. Ericksen described the general configuration of the property and discussed proposals for access off Puget Drive and Benson Road. He stated that the proposal has been reviewed by the Traffic Engineer, who indicated that the revised access plans did not appear to present a problem. Mr. Ericksen stated that the staff feels the plan is inadequate with respect to landscaping , particularly on the southeast and north prop- erty lines . Sketches of elevations on the proposed struc- tures were displayed and discussed . R• Renton Planning Commission Meeting April 23 , 1975 Page Seven stated that he was impressed by the exceptional stand of trees on the property and suggested that develop- ment as a park would be more appropriate . It was indi - cated by Mr. Ericksen and Mr . Smith that the subject had been previously considered by the Parks Director , but the Commission ' s position would be presented to the Parks Department . The Chairman invited comment from the applicant . John Dininger , 4725 W. Mercer Way, Mercer Island , representing the applicant , noted that the Planning staff had presented their proposal adequately and invited questions from the Commission . In answer to an inquiry from Commissioner Wik relative to the extent of filling and grading necessary for development , Mr. Dininger stated that grading would be held to a minimum and that the low profile design would tend to alleviate any major excavation . Dis - cussion followed with regard to the requirement for Planning Commission review of development in an R-2 zone , the matter of preservation of the trees , and the possibility of restrictive covenants . Mr. Dininger noted that their proposal meets the requirements of R-2 zoning and includes buffers to protect neighboring single family residences . He stated that they consider it a logical use as a transition from single family to commercial zoning and that the need for construction of apartments was indi - cated in Renton by the low vacancy rate . The Chairman invited comment from the audience . Joe Matthews , 4125 N . E . 17th St . , Renton , noted he was speaking for the adjacent neighbors and that they had reviewed the plans earlier. He stated that while none of them were very happy to see high density struc- tures in their back yards , they recognized the prop- erty owner ' s right to develop his site and that they could not expect retention of those big trees at some- one else ' s expense . He stated that they did not object to R-2 zoning as proposed with a special per- mit to 'construct . Mr. Matthews indicated that they would prefer to see some restrictive covenants included with the rezone application. He stated it is their feeling that a 35 foot greenbelt area would not be unreasonable and a fifty foot setback to include the thirty-five feet of greenbelt . He stated it is their belief that the matter of access to school had not been addressed . They also recommend that upon completion , a cyclone fence as high as permissible between the two zones would be desirable . Speaking for the neighborhood , Mr. Matthews requested that any action be postponed until the environmental assessment that has been requested is available for their review. He noted that it is their desire that the rezone and special permit requests be considered as a package in order to assure them of what can be expected . The Chairman called for additional comments from the audience , but none were offered . Chairman Ross then opened the subject to discussion by the Commission . Memo to Files Staff Meeting 4/24/75 re. Planning Commission Procedure Page Two • JOE AGOSTINO - REZONE Rezone from G to M-P approved by Planning Commission . LETTER TO COUNCIL BY MAY 5. Note : Ross requested that Mr. Fiddes be advised of date of Council hearing . • C. H. G. INTERNATIONAL, INC . - REZONE AND SPECIAL PERMIT Rezone continued until May 28th public hearing . ENVIRON- MENTAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING SET FOR 7 : 30 P.M. , 3RD FL. CONF. RM. • Staff to prepare for May 7th Committee meeting with specific recommendations regarding setback requirements, landscaping requirements , anything that we are going to require in covenants . Residents will also be submitting recommendations (Joe Matthews , spokesman ) regarding pre- servation of natural vegetation , pedestrian access for children to school (Sierra Heights ) , and fencing . Should look at the alternatives with reference to pedestrian access , possibly through Beale property. Should under- stand more specifically utilities, fire and access requirements. Consider effect of requirement for envi- ronmental impact assessment vs environmental impact statement. NOTE: POLICY WITH REGARD TO REQUIREMENT FOR ENVIRON- MENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT For any development which exceeds 25 or 30 units and larger than a 5 acre site, we should automatically require an environmental assessment. This should be requested at the time of application but certainly no later than one week. Staff to evaluate possibility of requesting brief EIS from C.H.G. , make a decision re. EIA vs EIS, and establish a policy on how we' re going to handle these in the future. WITH REGARD TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT WORKSHEET SUBMITTED BY APPLICANT, BRIEF PLANNING DIRECTOR REGARDING INPUT AND ANY CONCERNS PRIOR TO PLANNING COMMISSION ADMINISTRA- TIVE MEETING. • C. H. G. INTERNATIONAL , INC . - SPECIAL PERMIT not considered in view of continuation of rezone. Memo to Files Staff Meeting 4/24/75 re. Planning Commission Procedure Page Three INVEST WEST CORPORATION - SPECIAL PERMIT Special Permit approved by Planning Commission subject to: 1 . Limiting access to Puget Drive only until such time as left hand turn lanes are provided on Benson. 2. Staff approval of detailed landscape plan including additional width and materials along Benson Road and Puget Drive and the north- and south property lines . 3. Staff approval of revised site plan in view of excessive slopes of parking areas and ingress/egress . 4. Posting of a bond for 150% of the landscaping installa- tion and a 3 year maintenance period. 5. Staff approval of slope retention methods . tav p,J (z.ETEUTIOIJ - OIt / SEAR-A T[V+� Regarding resolution of landscaping lan , inadequate on -- �, PjJ north , east , and south -- did not increase strips as they indicated. Tie down landscaping on the north side and con- sider covenants on it. Note conflict between Traffic Engineer' s recommendation and staff report. Planning Department concerns regard parking on angle and drainage problems and ingress/egress . Check this out with Dave Hamlin and consider covenants . Get plan , check it out, sign it off, and date it. DO NOT ALLOW BUILDING PERMIT BEFORE ABOVE ACCOMPLISHED. 4101— JAMES KEFFER - WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS Planning Commission granted indefinite deferral of curbs , gutters and sidewalks until such as an L . I . D. is formed in the vicinity. Forward letter to applicant , with copy to Public Works Department, under G . Y . E. signature regarding deferral granted by Planning Commission . 410LYLE L . PICKLE - WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS Planning Commission granted indefinite deferral of off-site improvements until an L. I . D. is formed in the area . Draft restrictive covenants in relation to short plat and ask Mr. Pickle to sign it. Note : Also coming up with a soil survey. Memo to Files Staff Meeting 4/24/75 re. Planning Commission Procedure Page Four • COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS WITH REGARD TO HANDLING OF PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: I . RECEIPT OF APPLICATION A. Review application for completeness . B. Mark date received and indicate by whom. C. Person reviewing should become familiar with plans . D. Set up files in- rough form as soon as possible . II . RESPONSIBILITIES Mike Smith responsible to work with Bill Turner and Joan Lankford so they understand what is to be done and what has to be accomplished . Follow to see if everything is covered. Bill Turner to conduct basic review (setbacks , require- ments , building area , etc. ) and work with Willis to put together. Advise applicant if additional information or items are required. Joan Lankford to review site plan , landscaping , environ- mental impact. NOTE : IMPACT OF APPLICATION SHOULD BE DETERMINED BY THE ADMINISTRATIVE MEETING . Gary Kruger may be called upon as a consultant . III . PREPARATION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE MEETING A. KEEP PLANNING DIRECTOR INFORMED. Brief GYE by Monday or Tuesday (preferably Friday ) before administrative meeting regarding number of applications , what is involved , potention problems . B . PREPARATION OF MAPS AND CHARTS 1 . Overall locational map . 2 . Site Plan . 3. Property Plan (basically as submitted with a little outline of the property ) . 4. Prepare small location maps with simple notes only. (Joan Lankford will work with Bill Turner on these . ) C. Determine requirement for impact assessment informa- tion . Memo to Files Staff Meeting 4/24/75 re . Planning Commission Procedure Page Five D. Staff "windshield" field trip - suggest Tuesday A. M. or, if possible , Friday A. M. after application deadline. E. Following administrative meeting , Willis provides brief rundown before end of next day for review. F. Staff review Thursday or Friday prior to Planning Commission field trip. G. Publish legal Thursday following administrative meeting. H. Post Friday following administrative meeting. (Masters for signs for each applicant will be typed and given to Bill Turner for pasting , spraying and posting. Rita available for assistance. ) IV . PREPARATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING A. Color up maps and charts . B. Label maps . C. Take slides . Note : Location ; site plan on whatever is proposed ; land use plan ; shot of Comprehensive Plan !. in the area ; 4 to 6 general shots of the area including one head-on . Do not use out-of-date aerials . Consider wide-angle lens . Show topography and drainage . Include overall shots showing relationship to neighbor- hood uses . Only in unique situations include a lot of additional information . D. Lay out slides in consecutive order on lamp table for Planning Director to go through to determine what is going to be important. E. Set up flip charts (considered supplemental to slides ) . F. WRAP-UP: Rundown on meeting from Willis following day. Get together to determine what we need to follow-up. G. GENERAL COMMENTS : 1 . It was decided that composite maps for public hearing may be helpful and save presentation time . = i Memo to Files Staff Meeting 4/24/75 re. Planning Commission Procedure Page Six 2 . With regard to preliminary information required from applicant (dimensions , acreage , parking , etc. ) check over application in initial interview; note specific parking places ; dimensions ; think about the graphic materials necessary for presen- tation to the Planning Commission , etc. If needed information is not available , advise applicant , "We cannot submit to the Planning Commission unless you submit this information . " • 3. Following interview consider requirements for presentation , note them in writing so that everyone will be aware of process required for successful Planning Commission presentation . 4. Consider change in format of Planning Commission public hearing. Show slides first; open for discussion ; then refer to charts . Use graphic techniques to reduce other work. 5. DO NOT HESITATE TO ASK FOR HELP: Mike Smith to supervise , follow-up and keep Planning Director advised. 1