Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA00-171 1 Page, .loanmfi—enipson-Lande Feed ,---- From: Steve Taylor V To: Thompson, Joan Date: 4/6/01 10:17AM Subject: Lande Feed Joan: I received a call from a Mr. Richard Anarde, 717 SW 3rd Place, Renton, 98055 who would like to be made a party of record for the 95 Burnett Project. He read about it in the paper. Thanks. Steve 1 CC: Kaufman, Fred 1 • .m )} Joan hompson-95 Burnett M ,,i From: Steve Taylor To: Thompson, Joan t-y/ Date: 4/9/01 2:25PM Subject: 95 Burnett Joan: Heres another party of record for 95 Burnett(Lande Feed), LUA 00 171. Clarissa Berry 4008 Meadown Ave. North Renton, WA 98056 Thanks, Steve • • • • CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: December 4, 2001 TO: Leslie Betlack, Parks Director FROM: Jason E. Jordan, Associate Planner SUBJECT: 95 Burnett Landscaping Plan Review (LUAO1/-171) Per our previous discussion, please find the attached set of landscaping plans for the above-mentioned project. The applicant (PDSK Properties, Inc.) has requested that the City review the proposed landscape plan for both the on-site landscaping and the proposed landscaping in the abutting park area. This review is being requested as the applicant is preparing their final building permit plans and would like to have preliminary approval prior to final building permit submittal. Please let me know if you would like any changes to the proposed landscaping plan and I will pass that information along to the applicant. If you have any questions, please call me at X7219. Thank you. c.c. Jan Illian (Plan Review Project Manager) H:\DIVISION.S\DEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLAN.INGUej\final short plat memos\johnston-Memo.doc �3 p ^� F �I��-w I ------- I -------I-' m. Kf' / r t rl n V N f7 I EXIST 30 FIRE HYDT _ - C W/I 300'OF BLOG- o - - IT EXISTFIRE HYOT �� _ cn Le , `>: I I N i.W/I 150'OF BLDG IJ I'.',u — - 2'(1) X6 TAPPING SLEEVE(FL) _1n m in`, N r / (I) TAPPING VALVE(FLSMJ) `Sc io'x7.5_ _ o (1)CONC THRUST BLOCK-S"n-" 'v'=,`Q°'M°: _-4k ,n``_I `o¢ (1)15 LF DI CL-52 a--1 O (1)8•X6•TAPPING$L Et'Eo,(Fk o> @`I1 •1 u tO'o n w I ] - I EXIST FIRE HYOT �--+ (1)6" TAPPING N,1,13�(FLXMJJS \\Ill ll N V_I iI LI,5/ ` EXIST FIRE HYDT - - - _ , /2�- W/I 300'OF BLO'G� (1)CONC THRUST BI,(IC( 1 L { - W/I 1 0'OF BLDG (1)3s LF DI cP52 ^{--tr-, % a-71'1-=- _L-T---r-:--- . . -- _ rt'� r 1-1 -N 1 I�\ � -_- --- _ I ' GTS AS--GAS CAS-T GA$. may/°S--Gas=�-s GAG__- $ \��� -7` fi /'-__/ � •� 1— \ / 912.92' ��-T� c'� / V NO;30'45"E ® til U EXIST FIRE HYDT \\� 'Y �_-�:�s--_-.�_�_...sn. �I�e..._•.. a /_.--._.�..p _ �3 rt-• ---=-z^ = -�- err se a ----sa S� _ Y _ 15'TAP INTO 10 IAETR C W/I 150'OF BLDC - ss- �---� 12 L1F 15 PVC 0-SEWER-N - 'PI j �'_ 1 a 1 \__ ^PLUG/CA IT 46,�_ /, SS 0 601: E= .7 METRO APPROVAL REOD) c - �— 1 1 - 1^ - 108'METRO SEWER r, ! - , -' n--_-•• --_- --- �y t- ----r ss 1_0 N �- I I `� ,-5 LLI I I`I I (`1 I', 1 • I I I'LY I I J I I 111 I 111 12/Y-4,'I I I I_I_ull�v, ,'+ I Eb- Lj .p-,jj�I�6•coMel 1fON`sERNCD:B'tL 0', I�f ••I;,` �2 \' _Ir Ir ,� 1j?p '���\�K COMBINATION SERJICEk �/ 1'fT FPt+OPI ME�fEI(IN PREC�ST CoN6 PR�__. R I , `AI -�I I r ,.{ ..{ ` r.- METER IN PRECAST CONC PR cn OOORDTI<✓STALfA410N(Y'/CLry I {I• ' r �y ORD INSTALLATION W CLtt CD -- - j PCCd7205_^61 C..8 REMOVE EXIST SS OR 'I 1 5SMH II 48• 1`'+ / "` ^"` 1cv + ^ II DON PER CEOTECH-�IyI/'I�IPVC,.AN `�� '`RIM=36.2 I \ -`\ c, -� I \`/ SERVIC: -•2R ttP i IIE=15.7 15'F C J I T" _- - W 1 r CZ ;lY{E�'CSU':T l v 15'SAN rn O r'. O R$ P P N /�\� Y _.\ m'Y _� --L. ��„J.-- kne�G,),b�;jl--- •MNT 11.. .,` ( - 1-r- r--I� � Eil I I `t' It\ 07 .t. r-� et,--1 �-EXY BUiLDNG- TO BE'7D.10/ED(TlP)�• •-� NgL_ " � - T I r _ - / 23 '- %'''''' „; *. g _* r'* * f _ ,, /*.r..;1'eeE n \. ' slv'�„" ^ s y* c rn1 - FlLLJENI -N � • _-- - lam- - q� - � NLj, e_ - a .. m), ' ` 1„— \ (n .'180 LF 15•PVC � sa e Il�_I- T � -�z 1 f SS 0 0.2 , .o _ - AKB - - o d O-- _ LF,s•PVC _ I �� / SOO UNIVERSITY STREFT•SUITE 1122 o h iv ,n SE1T11E•MASXINmON•VSION,OA /z^ 1 r cNi g. __ z w 110013p,-01100•No. 020 351-043V E-• - ------- --- _ _ r - ---- AB JOB Nu.200132 �a� ��wo re. _ N N Project Team 100 o SoN - '^'_'w bJ r.2,0NAI. NK R4¢ = w /c 9 _a< I !!," mwEn IACIefEcr:• OMNI aY:SE/cuc CHUM BC ST -------------- Y.//i�Bo OATE:pemnpc 1;20W ' WATER AND SANITARY SEWER PLAN _�— -- -_1 _ - .__� SCALE I•-90' �� IS-a-pl I Permit _ --'� - Submittal co75,'06_Y= - - GRAPHIC SCALE - - - --- -- ,. -.Voris=-"= --- - -- C3.0 09,9'38- SCH'7�1n/F".t.n1 -�- 3 e. SE- 200019 CO 03 cV d z Lyg pz N E 6 i1 w — _ a r m t �. R U �ETi AVENUE SOUTH o _ 1 _ -- _ _ w,nmr G PROVEDO RD AM CE FROM .._I- ,..: .,..-�---. ----- �rean'x° rye° DADA LDm a :I LIE SOUTH cwuw�wiue m wnw.t $ o aco CV amccFrume,., EocEaw,x y .*,.;- -- . a H' '`-.•.. .. BUILDING E:�y.• znso tff ,awow•ern ! �Y/, x:::.-I „. -::...__,..:. Y.::_::..;_.t / � ��HQ%/////' _,.:_:..._..xr..�.,,'r::.,q;. ;°::s: - \ �� ! / :yam / 3; r • / t O \� l !,/tillNigt. " +.y�° M/ PROPOSE r Al OCOUF T IG f� / o ego - sf ►��I . . )4tIllitt. +/I / • ><: i c {add j ,i /// % %./� `:;s:.: :__:___:`'r/ '44 CO Cl ATT.DOA. . a 51650' ° FOR PARK DEVELOPMENT SEE LANDSCAPE T.T _ 9�w PEDESTRIAN MALL CONNECTION -p FROM BURNETT AVENUE TO PARKrdn�w s o ME Ee:necAPer I zF Q uoeuPw e CD CNI BURNETT PLACE SOUTH Chrl SITE PLAN s i„2o E- O Project Team wam rx:a 0 ®Eft TROUT xmmcr.Pc N °D PG E Eur.S p DATE Owen.IS.2C88 O O Slid(Plan N Approval 1 AfA .1 0 1 LOGAN AVENUE SOUTH 20006 / _ r 2 z 4 co 03 3 ASf'NALT 5AflE5 W LL CV r L RED GAGLE VENT VSTUCCO WYL elDp G j 6' EN TRELLIS URIDPL .as VINYL SID. CEDAR� 1 m 2 EL S,AS'TDRIDGE z „AFL -i ® ®\II� IV, ❑ 1,%%%I 11 IY _ I w &ID-GLCOR EL•Ml' �- ��� ---4,, --- ❑ ❑ _ ra [0 D9YB FLOOR EL SODS ' R LEVEL- { IIµ ,�� u O ❑ �® ® + � ❑ ❑ rril ® ®1❑ ❑ a oc .TSLAB El.A,.,' 1 B TLEVEL __- d- EL 5eT' in ',-.Zf r..T'G GRACE ' FF.EL 8,.,' AG4RAC£LEVEL �� / 4 O FACE C.P111AI LF8 6 EXISTS/GADP METAL GUARDRAIL 0 BUILDING"A" rn 8 NORHT ELEVATION Lo O SCALE 3/32.•I'-0' L1 r) O U) d 'CI i 1 CT DRIDGE EL_e166'� A �' Q 1V— 11 11 it ❑ ❑N» ii ' I-----T. EL,,`,' (�y t1■1�-'.711I1�'.''F111�.�'F1■■�1t�I�/// TDP.LErEL� F 0,1 Rim I Rif u TDA18S-FLOOR�L 6B,' s S 0 Ell Ell Q " a 111 EllI Z 13§ O y $ O ❑ ❑ I-- TDBIAe-FLOOR E-uLL_� RR� --- RI LE� F 21. o RAD E EXIST'c Dr, Project Team 0 - ,LEVEE RAECT L.C.ES Cal LIES 6 EXISTS GRADE MIXT 0000 PC WE ES a 0 BUILDING"B" MOESE 10 aTE-6mlm IL]® o SOUTH ELEVATION Site Plan N SCALES 3/37'•1'-0' Approval CD A5.4 0 z I 03 E I WOOD 5 D NM6LE0 ADD up TRELLIS VDITL 91DDiG aS j r�rAL CelArAaAM1 - 'AWL wImDL � m E [_ CEDAR TRIM NDC pR EL 0U6' H TOfUDCd?LEVEL t. eTDitlDGE �. OP.LEVEL (///) 4rE i 1❑ I11,,'1� ❑ ° 11 �TDP.LEVEL 'rn1 v1.1--DfT}T,TT}�ff. `Tr' C Z ® �E �_ Kali ® _ 1111 1.1 _ _ Mil I'if��llfllf"WIII"IIIIIIWIII II IIfY h 0 W TOD119-FLOOR EL 60.41' —� -' 0810iLCOR EL 60A1' ___ ALE EL up ® _ _ ®® ° fii ii ii ° ® ° EEL _ Rog , mom an - I 1 DUD-FLOOR EL.50D0' �_d• TD&ID-FLOOR EL 5000' _ ® ®�n,®® ® ,�PTMAB EL AtI' I R I __ �l RT LEVEL _ ��-y¢. LL ° -........°.........._...........°..� RI LEVEL S• • _ �V' _i.� .�� �.. �RDP.TDA EL.,., ❑❑I o0 li, 1.I ❑ ❑ ❑n �fl❑ ❑ PI, ❑ N LEVEL B y.� p !�' CI t 1 '--f 11A till +44 ❑ = I�¢7 R [{^,11 [Uf lWf L'J ❑ LJ F.EL.SI.I' L�pJ ail 1 .. ❑ 8F6F. L.SLL' ':.i. f"f f•f F'J I I , ❑ 66 GRC,ND LEVEL \\ 19TN EVEL BRIT FACE GAR Ex19TPG AND PROPO!£D GRADE ONNN OVERHEAD GARAGE DOOR CCI TRELLIS METAL EECWTY FENCE10 o BUILDING "B" WEST ELEVATION rn NORTH ELEVATION &SECTION THRU COMMON AREA SCALE 3/3:•.I•-0• ff Lo O SCALE 3/37'.I'-0' flt CO 0 d ris i L.E1 GE EL 0T66' OILP� N 40 EII iiwiliiiws O7 •TOP.LEVEL NI— ❑ ® ° girl ° ®® -^-_ Imo_ M 1 OP.LEVELMilli _ �, '� 0 girl ■I _I� If—If _ II lip INN�� H� RIB H m g3 -FLOCK EL 60A1 ___ =1 TODIID-FLOOR EL.6641 a I • O : :: _ RSVEi= LOOR EL.5000' -__ :s •X L.-FLOOR EL 50 _ R1 L VEl O ... --- .. = O ::: ' 111111W. 4IMAIMIN DUMB,'PG GROIND LEVEL OEQID m:KS O METEYi AVE PROPOSED GRADE p DATE:Do.R,S.3D00 N BUILDING "A" 51e Plan V) SOUTH ELEVATION &SECTION THRU COMMON AREA EAST ELEVATION Approval CP SCALE 3/32'.P-O' SCALE 3/VY.I'-O' A5.3 0 WW : i co j .00EN TRELLIS WOODEN TRELLIS 1 i rr A'SR1ALT SHI GLEE ASPHALT'SHrtGLES I AL CCP. CEDNIIT 4v4 ROOF HEGtrt EL 0331' 1 - E m,DP. — 'm•m .. \=11■. II% .\II...II%= \=llr�ll% II ��� v v . EVEL _ ■■■' _ II _iYf III-■■= �Ie° 1 ■■■ u �_ _1� "_1�_ � � _ Emu; _ 1- AYB-FLOOR EL.bpA,' E. --- — -1_-I_ _I_I_ ___ _I=L _f _ ___ -f_I. -11= ,— * — O Z �R3 LEY£L _- — w !!!. I _��1 _ l ailA iu 11�11 11'll - ii_ ®® = II = ®®_ ` _ -1=-1a • --. J=1= fii■ —=■ •, R]LEVEL - P.� ..-. 0 ❑ •== ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 00000 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 I II ❑❑ — ❑❑ ❑❑ a§ � g fTF �� F TIII'�1111 � EL.3'S1t' -�® El P, 4 Q IA oI , HO ON .Cy0 0.}P• LI r+.I I sk I'. . ,N,n '} ' ,1. Di ® 61 JJ �� FBI Ln OHGUE'STEXpTGGRA [4 Elf 1—f .+ � al {,■ •VI' `Qi € , In aLi' a - Pi at ..IC GM M 'ia %MK teat ® Fl � VELOOR�@Niel / ` LSE R E%I'STG GRADE \ DTY� \ METAL GUARDRAIL FENCE O \ BPLIT FADE R Boom — SECURI ALIY't DTOIffFROTIi WPDOYYDIX 'SFLI1 FACE SONG BLOCKS BUILDING"B" Lo 2 o EAST ELEVATION in SCALE 3/32'.1-0' O I O CO In Ni. ASPHCLT SIN GLE'S F TuccG E 6 IIV,•L BIDDGI METAL COPING vMrL WNDOL , METAL GUARDRAIL ' UCOD TRELLIS_ TDRIDGE LEVEL EL.2_. '',__ I AVG.IXJ6_IG-EL.e]5t' _Q �, gA - — -i%r�_Y_�_- 11//// I EL—� y 9 'II■■■II .. - \II■■■IV \II■■■II%.... \II■.■II% ■i■ Q .... .... ,- , ....... .... ... �_�� —--—-- TOP.LEVELe � �r $ Ch II 11 111 11 Ilill 11 III"I "11i1 mill 1111 No f11�"7� 1-111 1� !"I 1 1111 .- �■■■' __ W 1 o ® � FRAPIE E1A� RAILFl ___ " Di La 1�i1 rui 1111 Ii�l 1 �1 11�11 1��1 1��1 1111 �_ i_�_�_; 1.I�I. .f. i _ 1-1 1-1- P 1 if 1= F. --- — ,.D�.FLDDR EL.DDmp' i ; . ... .... .... ... 1 ■■■I 11 ❑ ❑ ����1.1 oho ❑�0 0 0 0�o o'0 0 0 0■❑"❑'i❑Iol❑lo El n El CI rv: ..l�■ . o ■ ❑ ❑ III IIIIR M.IMPA I f r r -. ° _ ,:.•'" .,:• ■ ICI � ��■. �I,11, ,Ci1S; �[311A[' p,&I Q;i-,tt'._1Rrfl[. bSbi.� IRtA!■6tiu�• q31.■G1,3'`w�■�Gl:Li.■��,11■.�dti�■ IAE-A�■1�i3.,�LS ■ Y SAY _eL.� Project o IIIIIIIIII �i1,__1I . 11110110111111nlllllllllllll�IIIIII,�IIIIIIIIII 10,111 ■ .■ L�■01�■ : � 11411a ■ ■itgri 1,■telalra tr tni : . E. r n .....F.E MELT ,m N GAFAIE LEv£L �D WHIM PC / ALIn ACE C.1 STOREFRONT OuvDNR FETAL GUAR BD11 E:PG 'SPLIT FADE SECURITY WIND LINE OF EXISTING GRADE METAL SECURITY O DTEEL'SEawi,'GATE STEEL ACE CON FENCE OEMS A:KS 'SPLIT FACE CONC.BLOCK'S oBUILDING"B" �" n:Oserba IS a� `�' WEST ELEVATION Approval I SCALE:3/37'•I'-0' I A5.2 0 A oo H TEN TRELLIS ASPHALT¢NNGLES SlOON T SHOGI.E9 / NNTLI N TRELLIS T V , . STUCCO fi 1R TROTMETAL COPOYa ASPH LT SH m-.� VMTL SIDING CEDAR TRIM • -WnIDOO METAL GUARDRAIL VWYL WI'IDOWro EL.AIDC£Blie'0\ F/ __ _ __. AVG.ROOF IE!Gr. ELL LN �w 6 ■ ■ ■ _ /�_ I —�-�-■ E.lldl' z )� � � � 'mmm � �� \I r r I-/-- \IIIII/.... � �IIFI'f�llh.... �� �s� "'ram �----- TDP.LE,E`� o w = HIM ram _ _ wimp' _ U _I'i !_I��1 NON Noii L o'!'_Iill mid (I��!'1 1= ___ L = DA�BFL F Y _ ___ = - - - LOOR EL.SORT N STEEL CANOPY RS LEVEL .�®® ®®®. I I• II - ®® �i1 ii1 no Ilia 11�11 iil "n 11�11 ha la_ = _ ff - -- e 1=1_ �f=1_ I_ 11= • J_1 _ L I_ A .FLDDR EL 5 O 'I.II.I. RI LEVEL 2O _ :, ❑❑1 , ... : 1— 00000 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ODOR ❑ 00000 ❑ --—OP tELABRE�LI+4, in 0 0 ❑ z�;� Ei ' ail' *i ; A'�Q'I i ilC[I OR l "Tr3IRf r 41 ;LT S f3F1 S3_ LJ 0 [7 E-N5.2 I•-I , : - j \ \ \\ 0 l 0 {- `49 .:...Ki, O. 1 r rA of. V.ifl LIARM 1.■ E Deli - '� s ■ ra —EeT EX Si G GCE ,J - \ _ —'- -GARAGE R /�� O �\ STUCCO SPLIT FACE CONC.BLOC. -LSE CF EXISTG GRADE ETA GUARDRAIL F L� ALIn STOREFRONT WMOCFYDOOR SPLIT FACE C.C.BLOCKS METAL SECURITY FENCE BUILDING "A" CI) EAST ELEVATION 6 in O SCALE 3/32..r-0' a 0_ O 0O a ASPHALT SHINGLES ASPHALT SHINGLES 0, KI BTNCCO IOCCo VINYL WINDOL METAL STDN3 / CEDAR BIDING IRTI EL SIGS. S METAL Bmatl CEDAR mut ` a --- ---I-----/ METAL GIIFIDRAIL in OfCLGE LEVEL y Q AVG ROOF HEKNT EL BaDI ___ .. __ _` E�TP LEVEL--- -- _ === M. \II� 1M IIr.... \II- _II%-: \II II%.... ��- !._ \II�r111% M i s 111 ii!=ii1 Nu Ii 'II ■m ■■i ® ■■■ II 11 II fill ■ ■ ® ® = 3 +---a 1 11 B =f-1= 4=11 = -I=1- =1_1= 'ff = 1=1= =!=1= ___ - z i 2> O =LOB—"' — - -- META RA E • ' V. N - IIIII ".il id _i-1 _ii 11 Ai II II m 11;11 ® ® T°""°`ID�°" T�D°J -EF,LODR EL.>8013 __ s -I=L =1_I= -1=i_ -1=1= R]LEVEL I .... z OO ,TDP.TDLAO EL.AIN -. .-- 0 •=lV ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ e ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ O ❑ ❑0 �I I I ❑❑ Pro�ec�Team LEVEL CB _ i t.� ,a LEI - F NB �[L^-,3y; ••. £i l i FEC MEL'-'��y S MEET KIR KS O IE0 CBOl_- I L) iJ L.f i';'1� IS°utJ � '� 4 1=A_ we:� ME .r'.`r'}' T. '''T 1111111 ... N BTEXIeTGGRAdR p ® p Lr: b 0 r _ 2 M All _ —\ :`: ,-all' — _-_ — \\ `+ ORMI 8n F4 �GiARAGE LEVEL-- ALIri STOREFRONT SSNOCWrtJOOR / a� KS 0 _/ MMEETAALL GUARDRAIL SPLIT ACESEC C BGATE WED*MS.NOD STEO LINE OF EXISTING GRADE 0.4ET FACE LL SECURITY FENCE N BUILDING "A" She u, WEST ELEVATION A5.1 SCALE 3/32.4-0' CI I . \ A'.,,•-•wta? -- - _... ___ . ---- -1 I J----- - I, ,.... -- -:,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,...;.,,,...---,,,,,,,;:,..,.-....,„,,,..,,,.,,,,,..v00,0o 4,1,•ok.i.4,*OW, •', ' e•..• ' ' — If.. ''•''' ..—\_..,:a_.,-, ,...‘,.1.4,\.LS,.:_•,. ..',',2,. I' . t":,..,,,,4,..•••.,,- ,..',..,...4.7,,,4.....,.„..r_,. ,e.0.4.19.al..414.11.-,.' -"`•`-',-,-,,..4.14...2.f.V„,,,,,,-, , ,,V, il,,N;;;;;;=-;.,-.,-1,-.4...M.,- :A,. ,/,_-.-________ __._____.,_ ...: •.,„•,:t_'•;:,15,:tr,-„,„"s,,,,,,•1••,,,,,,•:,,,,-_,••,-,4,„-_,:if,„,„",•,,nf,,,, ,,,;:%'n..„.:,,,,a,,,,,,,,,,,',"„-.,,,,,:,,,,,,/,',.,,,,:":::"..•:',.•••,,,•,,,,,,,, ,,,•••:.-tql,'„•:!“1.4'-'-', • '' --,•,...-,-...,....--,-,--'•-• ••,),‘,1-1,5.a -.1,•-,,,,,•,,•,,',- . ., --.,.-• :, , -- - , - ---;-,-• 011--ti'eicTiFia?4':-:',,,,..1,t'S:•-:',t',"'„,"."-k-',:zz,-;',,_71=',.. 545-,,,,•14.-te,%'..,•,'-;:5,2Si,,';,:',','.i•-1',A•nf,,-.°::::10%-ti:',..Y1'-f-'''''• 9 '?-51---ft-31:-:511'' l'A,1:1'-'4A'.•;>:''''',':;:,'24:':4- -'5:--if51'=)3,;,4.,-,:.,:,.;:5'1,-.y,',-s.141,,---:;,:..t:::::-OF:zR4,-,--;.i2-,i,,,,,,,A.,,:'-:21'.,ili.-:::ri::,..`.;.'Ai.',2.,--,,,' f. i I ,s,,,,,-..f,E,,,,,,, -,,,:,,,,,t,,,,,,k,,,f,---,,,,,,,,,,<4,,,,,,,,,, ...,,,,,,,,,,,,,;...,,,,,,g.,,,,,,,,,:„.,:,,,,,,, ,,,,,-,4,,,,,,,,,,4,-,,,e,..-:1.,,,,:,:;,,,-,,,,,,,,,,,),,,,,,,,,-5,3,,,,...i.k,,,,,q ,..„, ,,1,:..„ .,_,..4,7,-;,; ,-F,,,,, ,,-,1,,...Q. 1.i.,,.1.4, ...... ,:5.,,, , ,,,,,,, ,g.,,,,,,.- ;4-.,,,r,,,i.,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,--,,,,,,,AN5.-‘ ,..,,,:,,,,.,::,..,,,y,,,,.1124.:,,,,,,it.,,,,,:,,,,,..,,,,,-...,,,,.-.,.;:,,,,w IL... 4....7,e.,..4,(i.f.,,t;',.,,,,,,,.,',,...'...;;,..,1,;`4*.,2,.,...."5-tftNtk--g'1,,:764..•...M.,. ...?,%`:'1,,,..A:,TA,-,-,,.‘"-,ixr•I'-'0.,.,-.'clp,"$.,,,,,,,, ,..---41. I -7-, .7.,,,,r;......r 1 ''' '..'"''''''...''' '',4-'''.,'4%t.q...a.Z•k.,g,i,..4.:-,Iet.-724.!,..A.4..,:7;Q,..'.1'.,?2'.;.:.4';':;,-.'-'4,'''.,N1';,=.:..-,:.4-tg..?.V,,.'..t4,:,,:i4.,;47,1.• tirinitin3 :;.--...1 "-'r'k''.....V.I'',';. }:1;::('''";'F',.''' '..gCteft.c.'&2'''i;'S:;t:' ,-;.:;.&'''..)4,?.:';.:,,f$:'ekVi2'',0,C.;:;;.(eN4,,,-42.,k7,itk,;-;;An''''.X4;i.t,17*.".1C) ......n.i..?oti :',.;f4-,,,. f,.,1,-,44.,A't .'e.,:-.,:h.%;-..l.t;1‘.tij-tt',..,.tY,'-'rt:',,;,',It'.':4,4t.-37''''... ,:'°".'711:,..4:"C%';''ll'iti•i4,3`-K,I'Let.'.'kal),t':: -;:'r,',4:::;;'te,lrg:,14,V,.:.,7.7.: it,..7.7'4..,:i4;•St,4.WW,`:5?...1-44:::•,?...,;*;t:4.,4k^:aW4qVi.,74..,.. .,'''''t<• '';'''',',',.i.:4: •••:,j-4,;•,,, ,,,,,,,,,..v. ;,:in:....,,,,,,,fw.,:ip-4,21,,,,, i.:,,,,,4-4,Rq.;;:i0;-.;::,,k,f5, 1,',.....,:.,,z.,:x.i,.;,,,,--,,,p:,,,,.,,,,,,,:Je,,,,,A.i.41N . _,.•,,4---f,•,wc,,,A;',;,:",",,v,,.4..Y.'f.-,•.,::::;,,,,,,•;:,,:z11":,w2,"ty..;,,,,;•,,,,,Oit,,,,"•:,--`•,ff, 402,'" >4.k• 1 I A '',-:'.',...".-47..,'",4..R.df.,.-k,.v,;.„.-41'.z,-,Ifyfii,,,,:".,,,,:p .- 5.,.,... :-.r.,,,,,,,=1;.'4,,-5' : , ?1;HI ',"'Ll;" ,',..;',-,•:,VJ:.;r','''''i.Mt"&"=;'-'q'',,,"7,1,-;:;',''':,- " ,',i';',,:r;•;-0.:14'',',",g,,i':',0.:`, ""e,',.-:-'el';''',..::.'".'q:-. 4,"-,:n,•?;,', •\.•... , ; / e.,(5'."..,;?A':-11?),',",;:.",ii,`.4',',..-.?,,..,:- $40.'‘.-j.;.,,-;.:,...4,-.1;?;.;",;( 7,..6,;:....;--.g'A' i",:-K,4,''',:',,tri,• :,j,:t ---d---, 'F', '',:.%,:j.414=:',""r'Frk,'41i-v,--,f.,'',',414',.';','-';'..'?',!,'," '4-.i!'*'•0'.,F.-',:bz,',3',-,''O'V''-':',,--`4C..,.'-':',t's:,.''',wP.e.i,',-,:';'3'.P.:'. s' -'' '•,,..' Ir--fiv,,O,.. '-'N.''',."5"/;',','-..(:(;crl,412.24;',. -cy. :':. •:''.;;;...,..5',.'.%:"2.:,,f,"--',,,,fri.:Iy,,,V..';,.qi,-. .,,T,',`!.,',';..c4;:e.:',,;,.4,,,..1.4'.,;.U,.?,'•;?;*.,,J. = I 1 ' ' ,,-,;!.T:,-,,,;;;5,r,,,,.,p,:pc,i:-f.,:::,.,_Aw:.ikr:,-.;,l-p.:!,,-.,,{;:;,,i_4,;;,,yc,t,,,,,,:-A_,,,,.,:-,.-,L.,.p ,,:•.)....,. .:N.,,,::„?,,::,...,,-.. -_ s.,..,•_,,,,t.,ie,-,:,..,..,,g:6,..,;;:4::x,-;,,,',,;tz,:,.-,,,g4ir.gt,..-4,,,r_:t,,,,,-, ...:;,.,-4:,-,.r,..,:::,;p.c.,-x::;r,,,,,,,,-:i.-k.zt:,,,,:xg::,.k-v:,•,,,,, v,,f.,.!,, —1---' (A....11- -,'.f,P .- tW.ri')...1igljv:' 3=-3:' r -- '}-1.-., -,,,- ,Af,- , '4 ,:::.,..--._,-,--,..e- ' 1..,- ' `' 32'. .fia,, :. ...„.„- ,.3.,,,,,,,-c,,,,,„...A.,:y.,- ,g,cf,,,,T,...;„,,,,,,..,z,,,,..Fr:-.:,;:::::,;.,,..i-,,,,,,,,?:,;„(,;,..„.,;(:,,A,,...:*,,..,5,p,,,,..I„iz,,i,4,,,,,,...i,„;:::.„......,,,,:,:y„..v.:,-,,z,q_i_ii,..,,,,,,:r. \ t-,e_''I'''':'„''J-::T,:',".f.,:',.',Iz, y-4P,r;,'„i',Z, I,Zg,„^417,.',',,,L:•::,',','-''---',-',,Z','-'',.,'',;C•:,'&'',..§: t:;9:ak-V-3'',:r,,Y;,,,;,'•:',.<Mg'_c.,F,'":i'::,":',',I,Z,',.'I' ,„-;,.-t;., , , ;i-:i':'j-e„;.;,.,t;'t.;;A::.;.;:;,,- !4A::t:;-yf,4-.5.:;!,qq:,?,,A,rt.z-,:;,±;f-ik,i'3' ,-1..J,-",..f,, ,..-,.,:•:..,,,,..r.,-,,,,,:,....:,-,,,,,,,.,,,,,,,..,,-.'„,,„:,..,,,,.,,,,,,,,,T ,t31--,A.,.-...,".;.-':',.-L ...t• 1,..,..n...,' "..--'7,0,---",,,,,, ,,-- . ,,,,,7,4,,, ,,,y-..-.I..,.. ..,;,-,„,,. ..,..t.-..„,,,..‘„...N,I.,,P.,-.,,,,,,,,,,,,-,al,,.., 0 :..:1'' '4,*(l4.2, -.:::,.... ' .:'il:X71 -e::•a,li.4N> nlitl'iT,l:t. PSGC,lYZ,-1.4,7 ,4aZt., .,l .J.Sl,,,!,W4nk -,,,:a,......:SA- ,;., l4;4V.,1::l.l,".:4,l,",Y.:,,lg 0 \ '.l-f':'r,.--;.ria,a.;l-t.l::,;,'ll'i;n',,l;::;ll'',TA':l'lfl'22,gl4-"rl:',;*'-:%;,:':'ll%:'.:l4-4.il'an'llili'l':!nk,'^rkg.fn'Zt;,ili':.;'.?V,t:Si(Olj.l%:§.%'t'::4f(PA%,-§.lgl;,l"::?j, „-• -,a2,,,,- 417."- I Lr',''AW,i,,,V2',:','ll.Ailt.1)Vkr„',',l'f'lL%;,P5.,,,74N,;..:,::,,ii,,,; ',..'4,4l,l.*,,,,,2•Nl'cl4'64,..`:.,4e,l;n:?P.4.,Pfl„Yr.,'-',1ie,P,,";0;11,,,5,:,41 a \ \ tiP.41,.::27,3r'W,la2l, :,,Al'' '',1,:;.' ..'.-' ::"''''.""''''''"'''''''''''''..,",',',';',';';',: l.l0;:'7el2l:11',,;,!.$,:',4l'fn$- ',. ''''' • . -- ,.- ,,,,,, ,,,,,ll,a', _'I,_,,. .iil'474li,:,0 r,r,,:114,,':r."'''",:r. ' :-!,....‹.,......./4,0"ve,,,,,,,;,:s.'„,,:k:,-)PI'-''''-';,A,'••=''".-'''''''''''' '''''''''''''''''''''''''C'';''. 1"''''''''';',"--41.-t 0 -., .. '- i''''.'" Ale: •t . 4. , \ -4' , ,,,- •-•.-..,.,--- 641111MA:•-••!, Anifigr‘iriocilifi411"-- . . cc — - 0 •__ -. • .. 0 OWING LAIN AREA-, ' ., ... •43',7'.';.-:---•-• / — ._--- 1.0 .,..... 0 " , _ ----k----'--- & , -- .- ----:: .0 ' 6' 4"--Ex15TING LAU.AREA-J • ‘ • _------------ --.7, .....— 05 CL 0 ._ • 0- Crt Cn; Key PLANT SCHEDULE Treece: .clentlfle Name Common Name Qty. Size Comments i Incense Cedar 00 6-1'le rib.. &urea,Javan,. Japan.a.a enc,bell 00 I 1/2•cal f- Acer rubrum Red eunaet. Red&racer-lap. 00 2 tO°cal ir. Aeon clrelnatum VIno maple CO 2 I/2".1 ... 41 Aces-platonoldes'Coleman,' Col...mare Noma,.tlaple 00 7 I/2".1 a I I • Serubo: I :,,,,....,,....:, Rhododendron Fable Fable Reodoclandeon 00 _24°-342. as etoun _ lig 41....., Rhododendron ora Mateo' Dora Al.Rhododendron 00 5 gal cont 24.epr 6,670 Nand's,'domeettca'Compact,' Compact Heavenly Bamboo 00 5 gal cont. : 0492 Prunus laurocaraeue'Otto Lugken. Otto Luukan Laurel 00 Bee 50'eor 7 'el V ,....„,,,.„. .° Fhododendroe 9...nrotte. UnI66e1,1-oclodencaon 00 30.Keep, '44:F•‘04". EL1000110&eta'Corm:mote Compact ltarteed Euoreame 00 5 oal cent • ,000.2 v....thus *sore.1Pouatuse.sebum,. 00 304 art st...... E.- ,1',, Palette..menus eued Fern 00 26. me that. 00000 Voce..ovetum Everareen Nucklebeerru 00 tft° as down Par...tool..vIceptclata Poston IVY 00 24. Project Team — Deslan Two Four/Two Six. I Inc landscape orch;tecture•site development•irrigation planning eZOS leath Al,.NE.Sote?az seem,WA ea007 (Rs)eat-2426 Ceroundcover. tdt..4Mgri N'"''' , eestaeonal colon plants Al-Mt.i,,'1-- 14.arocallts Slop Gaultherta shall.. Daulllq Bald As reed 2 gal cant Ae reed 2 dal cod 24" Ae reed 2 oal event 24.0712 nada ttatu fi es rg...gy..xxx CKON71 MI 0CK cotNo...,,00 r,4.,,/,1 Aratcataptgica uva eel ..mtdOrhtdc. _As r.ed 2 gal hem 74°oe -- ----- LIttlelear Per,lr*Jrt Ae reed 2 gal cod. Ist•, Design Development I Sodded Lao -4- LANDSCAPE PLAN-STREET FRONTAGE AND PARKWAY • ExletIng Tree. - See Tres Preservatton Plan LI-5 far Spool."and 5lue L1.1 SCALE: r A 20. I 200019 ... .c.,„,„„4 „e,.. „ ,„_,/ r ,, ,, , , i `` lit rig f - Idi(LTP) g J {i'4pi f 1 I .,,y_ I��i iiiL1f • ^=r P,"91AT19M• =Y`v O ��,Fi%py:LDi,iipaeuG�g% ';,/ �,t' 11''11 0 CD 11111111111 11 #xa VIA :ill _ I i iT �r, CC a `� CO ci ir.-.) d-I-�: 11) /1 C 1` uc UPPER PATIO-PLANTINGS AND HARDSCAPE -7- 'T SCALE: Ire•=r . *- Y _T 11 - d -'2-: — PAMO PATI9N _ T_. ,, '` ka- \\ I $m.. HARDSCAPE LAYOUT-PEDESTRIAN LINKAGE SCALE: `x° SCaIE: I1B•=It M AROCIR LOAN ET A. p�IT..x, Daspo o Two Foud vTpm ao 31x. en landscape architecture•site development•irrigation planning DATE xarene..I.lam ♦205 I48u Ave.NE Suite tOt Bellevue,WE 0J (135)891-3436Design Development L1.2 200019 fiLI • L. ,S.pWi14,,,1F.: S.Y.�:f YYC��.y', L L l�C" ®. I1IM/F L,DWL4iAl,lAE I2a E IWNG N e c.� I�D71i , /.,1, . . .+n 7, , _ Ear } ,. G or.. 1 • c- -- 1 7 1 1 Y . .L a OE: ' .MAW: .. 110/ E..•1 i IMIIiHllR't,,E.L.e..m,Pa,.1= ,' ©tie "..\ CT ~' .e''T ^ ` 21 -- -n ti.r. A1Tr, c`+.. a_ tea: _ _ - , t`sV' b`"" 1 rr.••:.//..„ /..1 • ' . .. AYES a %T M / 'yla - "lr 1 4 EntittlWallitlaTANN . - 'p f�' l I- V4}7-23-5 �1 :�7 t1 t .tu*us: /' AVE. % L 3 -. i_ ^-i :1..i • '' t 1 'A C y � �, a µr . ',.. i" 3Y Slbi •p+••(�..1e,-AR /- -_ 1 •a 1liNg TL !it, • . ,zg,•=.• i •• it- % -oa A. 4 4- 'CI'Ae //,'/—Q4' - r - ,. - I if . . iv \ A ' 41101i .t.:„,< i . , - / ...../. ,,,, ,,, ,11 ,_444 w.../..:\ .. LI 4 <-, 44%4'40 .A.M5FAINF 6 .'' ./'° ;: ;AMIE'?' '11 Fili ® ' . � ILII K! i , � 4. i� . � _ �9 { � � o "5 ' -�t ; 4� 6 -* -off► . . .-:_ 0 CITY ®F RENTON � �� NIL 1055 South Grady Way -Renton,Washington 98055 te d APR 12'01 0� yd ; 0 5 3 .a ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED ..k 715a U..S. po8:TA 7. • 1 • E,. • • r. I i"' 11 . Ft PRESORTED -SEA WA 81 . • Artice le o 14415 2 Street SW Seatt ,W 8166 ado SUCH • •;, • j s 4 I r,1 . ADDRESS ,z ® w t RET'URIa TO.SF.ND.ER ,,, ____----_—.---. . ---cc) 04...�- � vie fsiirJ% 111,,,Il:millieiliiiluilki.11aatl1.11,61111itt1 — April 12,2001 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: PDSK Properties, Inc. 621 Pacific Avenue#300 Tacoma, WA 98402 File No.: LUA00-155,SA-H,ECF LOCATION: 73, 75, 77 and 95 Burnett Avenue South SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The proposed project includes the demolition of Lande Feed Mill and several small commercial buildings to construct a four-story apartment structure containing 118 dwelling units. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on March 6, 2001. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application,field checking the property and surrounding area; the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the March 13,2001 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday,March 13,2001, at 9:21 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Site Plan application, proof of posting,proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: East Elevations Exhibit No.4: West Elevations Exhibit No. 5: Auto Court Elevations Exhibit No.6: Water and Sanitary Sewer Plan Exhibit No.7: Landscape Plan Exhibit No.8: Neighborhood Map Exhibit No.9: Zoning Map Exhibit No. 10: Business Map Exhibit No. 11: Materials Board Exhibit No. 12: Historical Report for State of Washington Exhibit No. 13: Urban Center Design Overlay Exhibit No. 14: Notice of Infraction and 11 photos Regulations Report 95 Burnett Project File No.:LUA00-171,SA-H,ECF April 12,2001 Page 2 The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Steve Taylor, Senior Planner,Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way,Renton, Washington 98055. This project is a 4-story, 118-unit apartment complex to be located on a 1.3-acre site on the west side of Burnett Avenue South. The project will be constructed as two buildings,3-stories of residential over a parking garage. The two halves of the building are connected at a central lobby with a second story courtyard above. The building is approximately 50 feet in height at the peak of the roof. The density for the project is approximately 91 dwelling units/acre. The first floor of the building will contain structured parking with 164 stalls. The property is bordered on the west by a City park. The park currently consists of lawn and trees with a pedestrian trail. The roofline of the building intrudes slightly into the air space of the park on the west side of the building and the right-of-way on the east. Additionally,the project will remove two underground storage tanks associated with the Lande Feed Mill. Environmental studies indicated the presence of contaminated soils that will be removed prior to development. The project also includes the replacement of a sewer connection from Burnett Place S.to Burnett Avenue S. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC)issued a Determination of Non-Significance—Mitigated for the project on February 12, 2001. No appeals of the threshold determination were filed. Mitigation measures included compliance with the geotechnical consultant's recommendations,removal of the underground storage tanks under DOE regulations,abatement of any soil and water contamination identified in the environmental studies, payment of appropriate Fire, Traffic and Parks Department mitigation fees, and the implementation of a rodent abatement program. In response to a question from the Examiner,Mr. Taylor stated the contamination on the north end of the site resulted from the area having been occupied by a diesel and fuel oil distribution center up until the early 1960s. Mr...Taylor.continued by reviewing the project's consistency with site plan approval criteria. The project conforms to the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies in providing mix of uses, and supporting downtown development in striving for urban density and intensity of uses. The proposed use will provide a more intensive use of an underdeveloped site and create housing opportunities. The project also provides for the multi-family mix in residential units and is located in the Downtown Core. The project incorporates pedestrian connections and open space features into its design, as well as provides structured parking for the units. Mr.Taylor stated that there have been reports of Lande Feed being a historical building. In the Historic and Archeological Resources Section of the Land Use portion of the Comprehensive Plan it states that historic and archeological resources within the City should be protected. There is no City documentation or maps that designate this property as an historical site. The property is listed on the King County Inventory,but not on their Historical Register. It is also not listed on the State of Washington's Historical Register. Continuing with his review of consistency with site plan approval criteria,Mr. Taylor discussed the project's conformance with Land Use Regulations. The site is located in the Downtown Core Area,which makes it exempt from many of the landscape,parking, setback, and lot coverage requirements. The footprint of the building will cover most of the site. The applicant has made application to the Board of Public Works for a Right-of-Way Use Permit for the air encroachment into the public right-of-way. No setbacks or landscape requirements are applied to the CD zoned properties in the Downtown Core Area,unless the property abuts residentially zoned parcels. In this instance,the property abuts residentially zoned property on the north side of the building. The applicant is proposing a 16-foot landscaped setback containing a pedestrian connection on this side of the building. The proposal includes several landscaped courtyards,as well as the development of an urban plaza within the park. Due to the close proximity of several of the park trees to the property line,there is the potential that their root system may be damaged during construction. Staff recommends that this potential be evaluated by a certified arborist and that a report be submitted prior to approval of the building permit documenting their recommendations. 95 Burnett Project File No.: LUA00-171,SA-H,ECF • April 12,2001 Page 3 Mr.Taylor stated that there is presently a sewer line that crosses the building site from Burnett Place S.to Burnett Avenue S.where it taps into the Metro line. This sewer line will be relocated to the central portion of the building. City staff determined that the new sewer line should be placed within a sleeve so that it is protected from downward pressure. The pipe could be accessed for maintenance either from the courtyard or from the park side. Generally structures are not allowed to be built over sewer easements,but in this case staff is felt this would be the best alternative. The cost will be completely borne by the applicant. This project is subject to the Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations. A staff report was issued on March 6, 2001 describing the criteria and the project's compliance with it. The Development Services Administrator has determined that the project is in compliance. Construction activities would result in some noise,dust and traffic impacts on surrounding properties. These impacts would be limited to the construction phase of the project,which is estimated to have a total duration of approximately 16 months(April 2001 to August 20,02)...The applicant has submitted a Construction Mitigation Plan outlining mitigation measures to be•employed for minimizing dust,noise and traffic impacts during construction. Potential short-term noise and traffic impacts from the,initial construction would be mitigated by the proposed work hours of from 7:00 a.m.to 5:00 p.m.,Monday through Friday. The Environmental Review Committee did detailed evaluations concerning the types of impacts to the site itself in terms of the contamination and the tanks on the site. They were very thorough in putting conditions of approval that meet the state standards on this project,which will result in the clean up of a contaminated site. The proposed multi-family development is expected to increase property values in the vicinity of the site. Adding residential population to downtown will improve the customer base for commercial businesses,and this is also expected to increase.property-values. The applicant:was asked-to do a-traffic impact'analysis,which estimated that 418 additional average daily trips would be generated by the project. A Transportation Mitigation Fee of$75 per average daily trip was imposed,which is estimated to total $31,350. Both the Fire and Police Departments have indicated existing facilities are adequate to accommodate the project, subject to the applicant's payment of the necessary impact fees. The Renton School District has indicated they have adequate facilities to serve the children generated by this project. Children would attend Lakeridge Elementary,Dimmitt Jr. High and Renton High School. The proposal would redevelop and improve a site that contains deteriorating buildings, one of which was partially destroyed by a fire in recent years. The investment in this area and the added presence of a residential population would serve to prevent neighborhood deterioration and blight: Staff recommends approval of this project subject to the six conditions contained in the staff report. Kent Smutny,Thomas Harkey Architects, 13400 Northup Way, Suite 30,Bellevue, WA 98005 used the elevation drawings to explain the design of the building. He described the various types of materials using the materials board, and explained where they would be used in the building. Decorative screening will be used in the openings of the parking garage, as well as decorative landscaping along the outside garage wall. The upper three stories of the building are modulated. The portions of the building that are most forward to the street will be stucco. The areas of the building with decks that are set back father will have horizontal beveled vinyl siding in a contrasting color. The center area of the building will have vinyl shingles in another contrasting color. This will break up the building visually, so that it will appear more like two buildings on each side of the courtyard rather than only one. The building will be accented with another trim color on the railings and hip roof forms. The building roof material on the hip roofs will be composition shingle in a complimentary color. These materials and colors will be used on all sides of the building. 95 Burnett Project File No.: LUA00-171,SA-H,ECF April 12,2001 Page 4 Mr. Smutny discussed the issue of the overhangs that extend from the roofline of the building. The overhangs are part of the modulation of the building,which has been carried into the roof structure. The hip roof form with overhangs creates shadow and helps provide a more interesting appearance for the building, although the overhangs extend into the right-of-way or the park side in a few locations. There are four locations on the park side and on both sides of the building where this encroachment takes place. If the overhangs were not allowed, some type of flat roof design would have to be used in order to keep completely out of the right-of-way,which would be disappointing to the design of the building. Currently the building is residential in character and will fit well into the neighborhood, as opposed to a flat roof form of design. Regarding the park and the trees located there,Mr. Smutny said that it did not make sense to bring in an arborist at this time because they do not have enough information for the arborist to decide which trees need to be removed. During the next phase of the project,the structural engineer will be able to provide better information on what will be required for the excavation of the footings. When the arborist has that information,he will be able to more reasonably determine which trees are in danger. Trees will be removed only to the minimum extent necessary. Currently the park provides access from the central downtown area to the river walk. It is simply a pass through area without a focal point. The development of the paved area with a planter and a circular seating wall will provide a focal point and a gathering space for the park. The park will be more consistent with its location within the city and with the urban development of the river walk that it connects to. The tandem parking stalls in the project will be for the 2-bedroom units. All of the 1-bedroom units and studios will have a single parking stall. This tandem arrangement is often found in narrow townhouses where there is only enough room for a tandem parking garage. The parking aisles in the parking garage will be 24 feet wide, which will be wide enough to provide maneuvering space to get in and out of tandem stalls easily. Paul Krakow,applicant,PDSK Properties,Inc., 621 Pacific Avenue#300,Tacoma, WA 98402 discussed the contamination issue. They have had the property tied up for about 16 months, and have spent the first 8 months working with Chevron Oil Company. PDSK has an agreement with Chevron that once they reach the contamination, Chevron will extract the oily soil and take it to an appropriate land fill. They have done numerous borings to determine the location of the contamination. The contamination has not migrated off site, and it is PDSK's intention to remove it before it does. Regarding the four encroachments from the hip roof, it is PDSK's feeling that the building will be a softer design,more residential in flavor with these overhangs. The City is very supportive of it. PDSK feels that a reasonable tradeoff for the encroachments on the west side of the property would be the 15-foot easement for pedestrian access to the park. They are hopeful that the four encroachments, as they are now designed,will be approved, otherwise it may be necessary to negotiate some other type of easement on the north end of the property and to look at a flat roof design for the building. From a practical standpoint, a flat roof does not perform as well as a hip roof. A flat roof can allow moisture in the buildings. It is PDSK's intent to keep the building,not to build and sell, so the performance and the esthetics of the building is very important. Kirk King,DDS, 66 Williams Avenue S.,Renton, WA 98055 stated that he considered the redevelopment of the Downtown Core in making the decision to locate his business in the area. He feels that this project would create a dynamic environment for businesses in the area by bring in more potential customers. He stated that he feels a project of this caliber fits the neighborhood and expressed his strong support of it. Richard Stauff, 13813 139th Avenue SE,Renton,WA 98059 stated that he owns property Burnett Place. He expressed concern about access and the increase in traffic on Burnett Place with the development of this project. Burnett Place is only 15 feet wide in some places, and when motorists speed this is a dangerous situation. 95 Burnett Project File No.: LUA00-171,SA-H,ECF April 12,2001 Page 5 The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 10:55 a.m. FINDINGS,CONCLUSIONS &DECISION Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant,PDSK Properties,Inc,filed a request for approval of a Site Plan for a two-building apartment complex and associated parking. . 2. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State.Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M)for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site consists of four parcels located at 73, 75, 77 and 95 Burnett Avenue South. 6. The subject site currently houses the Lande Feed Mill and several other small commercial structures. The subject site is across Burnett and slightly north of the McLendon's Hardware. 7. The subject site was part of the original Plat of the City of Renton, incorporated in 1901. 8. The subject site is designated CD(Center Downtown). The subject site is located in the actual Downtown Core Area and is exempt from a number of development requirements. The subject site is exempt from required parking, setbacks, lot coverage and landscape requirements. 9. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of urban, downtown uses,but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan.. 10. The applicant proposes erecting two, side-by-side.four-story apartment buildings that will contain 118 dwelling units. The first floor will be a garage containing 164 stalls. A small plaza would be developed in the adjacent park to the north of the subject site if the Parks Department agrees. A trail connection would link the subject site to the linear trail that runs through the park. 11. The subject site is level. The existing structures and paving would be removed to enable development. In addition,two underground storage tanks, one on the subject site and one on the adjacent park but serving the Lande Feed site will be removed. 12. The applicant proposes developing the 1.3 acre parcel with the apartment complex. 13. The proposed complex will have a density of 91 units per acre which meets the Comprehensive Plan's policies. 95 Burnett Project File No.: LUA00-171,SA-H,ECF April 12,2001 Page 6 14. The two buildings will be connected along the north side of the first floor and there will be a rooftop courtyard on the "bridge" area. The project will contain approximately 56,557 square feet. Each primary building will each contain an approximately 25,942 square feet footprint. The buildings would be approximately 500 feet long(north to south)facing Burnett and approximately 109 feet deep. Buildings are permitted to be 95 feet tall in the CD zone but the proposal will be 50 feet tall at the peak of the roof. 15. The building will have a.varied roofline with pitched roofs and overhang areas. The facade will modulate and have articulations as well as horizontal and vertical detailing. There will be a variety of materials including asphalt shingles,stucco and vinyl siding,and a variety of trim detail including metal, cedar and vinyl. 16. The building will also have portions of its overhanging roof that intrudes or overhangs the neighboring park and the public right-of-way along Burnett. There would be four locations where the roof overhangs the airspace of the public park that include two four-foot and two seven-foot overhangs. There would be four two-foot intrusions over the Burnett right-of-way,in this case,public sidewalk. These incursions will create a precedent for this already large building,and could encourage others to also develop buildings that take full advantage of their underlying parcel and then intrude into public spaces creating shading and shadows in public spaces. The Board of Public Works would review "Right-of-way Use Permits"for the proposed intrusions. 17. The applicant proposes developing a 15-foot pedestrian trail easement along the north boundary of the subject site for access to the park. This trail would be accessible to the general public in exchange for the air rights to overhang the'public-spaces: 18. Entry to the garage will be through a centrally located auto court. This will consist of a circular driveway that branches off to the parking garage. It will be landscaped and will also provide entry to the building for pedestrians. 19. In addition,to the landscaped auto court entry,there would be a landscaped area along the north side of the building and above the lobby area at the second floor level. The applicant is required to provide a setback on its north between the Senior Housing's RM-U(Multiple family residential)Zone and this CD Zoned parcel. Street trees are proposed along Burnett. No other setbacks are required or provided. 20. The applicant has proposed providing a more formal plaza for the rear of the building in the small public park that abuts the western side of the subject site. This would require approval of the Parks Division. 21. The parking would be divided between the two wings of the complex with 81 stalls in the north wing and 83 in the south wing. This would provide 164 stalls for 118 units. While the site is exempt from parking requirements, if parking were required,it would have needed 159 stalls. Seventy-six stalls are tandem,where jockeying of cars will be required to reach the inner vehicle. Apartment assignments will permit these shared-tandem stalls. 22. There were the two underground storage tanks noted above and it appears that portions of the subject site might have held other petroleum compounds. The site was tested for contamination. Evidence of contamination were found. The ERC imposed cleanup conditions. 23. The project will probably adversely affect trees located in the adjacent park to allow work near the common property line and tank removal. The applicant would remain liable for any damage if it receives permission to work in or adjacent to the park property. 95 Burnett Project File No.: LUA00-171,SA-H,ECF April 12,2001 Page 7 24. The applicant anticipates that development would take approximately 16 months. The normal impacts of construction are expected, including heavy machinery, dust,noise and traffic. 25. The project is expected to generate approximately 418 additional trips. Staff did not indicate that this would create any untoward impacts on local traffic. 26. A sewer line will need to be relocated to accommodate the proposed development. It could run under the center of the building. Staff recommended that the applicant hold the City harmless in the event the line needs additional work. 27. The site is subject to Urban Center Overlay regulations which are reviewed under separate authority. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The site plan ordinance provides a number of specific criteria for reviewing a site plan. Those criteria are generally represented in part by the following enumeration: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; b. Conformance with the Building and Zoning Codes; c. Mitigation of impacts on surrounding properties and'uses; d. Mitigation of the impacts of the proposal on the subject site itself; e. Conservation of property values; f. Provision for safe and efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation; g. Provision of adequate light and air; h. Adequacy of public services to accommodate the proposed use; The proposed use in the main satisfies these and other particulars of the ordinance. The incursions into public spaces is one of first impression and creates precedents that would seem to have deserved more analysis by staff. 2. The proposed apartment complex is compatible with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. It provides concentrated housing in the urban core of the City. It is compatible with the City's goals of creating an urban center well-served by housing and transit opportunities. 3. The building's bulk and height meets the requirements of the Zoning Code. The proposal provides the one required side yard setback adjacent to its north property line where a residential zone abuts it in that location. Building and Fire Code compliance is determined when a building permit is submitted. 4. As noted,the building intrudes into public spaces at its roofline. This will have the affect, even if minimally,of blocking sunlight and the sky from public spaces. The park on the north of the site is 95 Burnett Project File No.: LUA00-1 71,SA-H,ECF April 12,2001 Page 8 already small and narrow and the absence of a setback will crowd it even more. The fact that the building's roof detail will overhang it will make it less open. This office would recommend that the Park Division deny use of the air space. The overhang over the street is smaller and the street is wider and can suffer the incursion better although, again,as noted above,the building is already filling out the majority of its site which creates the unnecessary precedent of intruding and shading public open spaces, including sidewalk areas. 5. It would be hoped that the residential use and the nearby McLendon's, including its outside storage and its working lumber yard will be compatible neighbors. 6. The project, other than the intrusions appears well designed. It provides modulations and interesting facade elements. 7. The redevelopment of the old and fairly rundown feed mill site should help conserve property values in the area. 8. Staff has reported that the auto court entry as well as pedestrian access seems appropriate. 9. The site itself is fairly intensively developed but the auto court,upper lobby court and two-building couplet should provide adequate light and air for the project. As well noted,the incursions into public air space will cut down the amount of light and air at the ground level in a public park and along the sidewalk. 10. The site is in the urban core and-should have adequate public services. DECISION: The proposed site plan is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant is required to comply with the Mitigation Measures that were required by the Environmental Review Committee Threshold Determination. 2. The applicant shall either modify the project's roofline to remove the encroachments into the City's park property and right-of-way or obtain a Right-of-Way Use Permit from the Board of Public Works and also obtain an easement from the City to allow the air encroachments. The easement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division and the City Attorney. 3. The applicant shall submit a report by a qualified arborist evaluating the potential for construction damage to trees on the park property. The report shall make recommendations to mitigate impacts to,or replace any trees that may be damaged. The report shall be reviewed and approved by the Parks Division prior to approval of the building permit. 4. The applicant shall submit revised landscape plans incorporating recommendations from the arborist evaluation and staff recommendations for species type on the park property. The plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Parks Division prior to approval of the building permit. 5. Prior to building permit approval,the applicant shall record a new sewer easement that includes a hold harmless agreement indemnifying the City from all liability arising from maintenance to the sewer 95 Burnett Project File No.: LUA00-171,SA-H,ECF April 12,2001 Page 9 main. The easement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division and the City Attorney. 6. Prior to building permit approval, a 15-foot trail easement shall be recorded along the pedestrian connection on the north end of the property. The easement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Parks Division and the City Attorney. Plans for the pedestrian connection shall be revised to show the connection to the trail, subject to the review and approval of the Parks Division. 7. The Parks Division will have to agree to any modifications to its park and it may seek maintenance funds from the applicant for any changes that would increase park costs. 8. This office recommends that the Parks Division deny the incursions on the west side of the building that will shade and shadow the park. ORDERED THIS 12`h day of April, 2001. (Ou/iliN2L FRED J.KAU AN HEARING.E MINER. TRANSMITTED THIS 12th day of April, 2001 to the parties of record: Steve Taylor Kent Smutny Paul Krakow 1055 S Grady Way Thomas Harkey Architects PDSK Properties,Inc. Renton, WA 98055 13400 Northup Way, Suite 30 621 Pacific Avenue#300 Bellevue, WA 98005 Tacoma,WA 98402 Kirk King,DDS Richard Stauff Leslie Betlach, 66 Williams Avenue S. 13813 139th Avenue SE Director,Parks Division Renton,WA 98055 Renton, WA 98059 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 TRANSMI Fl ED THIS 12th day of April,2001 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman,Plan/Bldg/PW Admin. Members,Renton Planning Commission Neil Watts,Development Services Director Larry Rude,Fire Marshal Sue Carlson,Econ.Dev. Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Larry Meckling,Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler South County Journal Betty Nokes, Economic Development Director 95 Burnett Project File No.: LUA00-171,SA-H,ECF April 12,2001 Page 10 Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m.,April 26,2001. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or fact, error in judgment,or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14)days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV,Chapter 8, Section 110,which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents-Of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. - ‘ - '' - - • ,.... ..,. , tt f --1-•--1- • --F..- --1-- . .....t • •. \ .I L ( P ) /, ..\\ ...._..,., ,..........t....„,__ t _ N , .. . . . . ... , . \ ,, ., / _03,.____ ''"•r.. ..:'' \ \ \ . 4r.Y CO L \ \ 1 I H ( P ) \N — ( —.---- rkP)z/ \._ - 1 ; ""------ . Airport Way P ))/NINN R-8 1 .---8 i -r -.- 1NN , / ----(X-- 1 - . . I 1 QA1 i 1 • , 1 legriki. . I _ 1 A cAi ____1 -el -rn.• !. 1 I Fr ' I 'R' El i PI R18/ IV RM-U N, -NN /'>:: 1 . I 1 -1 TO bila IS,V - • 7 r:-. -..1 "LY -----L- --!-- __. --. I ' ' r4 "MIMI \\•••••• N-s• ! ) , R-48, • , • , , , , , - ---1 Ica CA rp. * -±it--.1\ ._.___6115.__ -.RFir_u \\ ---\-`4>1 C D ( P ) . 5frg. -- , ___ .\_______, _i_. Rm- -- I--- ; . .-,.._:._ • __,... : . .. • ___H.1 . II f-lei Su --c- - CA tic .__ -S.T. ..___I--::: , "4 • -1-.• \ o- -- - --- C D C-D --..-- ---i— P-3! > S 2nd St. .7._-__ ------ 7 te) --h._ . ............... I/ . ,_ ,_... . .. . . _ I...ri in ----- --L S 2nd -/ . z + 4—I ...._: I I/ q A_ __----L-a-)- _.--- ...._ *fil ___ . _ CD — .CD 11 :Li_ .::::: . . --r---y , i ,x-, —.I__,. , Th-- 11)-,, CD CD ---- -B- --- • 1 Is 3r!d 1 .1------.. •— - - -d StiT cP-5 17.' d I I ; i ' I i icDtil Itociai i-c-bilmi Lii pi_ . :_h____T_L_L_, _ .. i-4--) : . :,...4 I i;--, C,D, 1 L____. .. —1.__CD 1- .4 ) • S13rd 1 Pl. .- -0- ----- 17 --::._.:— -4,&-= --- ____J\ 1 • . -1 11:-: 70-: - ---- : CD CD(P) • 11 .: - --- -----IS • .,----- 3 —d 1• Ef. ••••••••., ......)oneo 0 0.0 00 0 , --:D '' CI: ill:- --- Can 1 --:--.)• ---- ---- -. --- --- / 1 I -:: ipsd.._ 0 .._7D:F1 .,----0 -.- -.-- - - • CO CO N ct • —T —1t1 U 167T AVENUE 80UTH 3 S I R r aararu�i lrorcxirnr N ILD 0 — — `t ^ `yiilUGittf'�SIZ�1YYiFi'+ 4tTlp�yrgqtt$ tidfisiiiiiiii�vlYfiY+ , ¢.Ed�4S$► FR M O ENTRANCE �— +' •� _SOUTH w.wa.w H�rwnr (Yl %s o �.r`y'.z s`z&,-+, Ik "a yid r�, .r,.��,•"; t-�'""�'..�+.""ei ;-"t ;..I )pa A 1�y�• ,R17. I//i/ T31_PRIIIMM‘ummumenammon. mg�QS ` �i. A�9�d67D1A's75��4 • •. i cc :yr• far � 6� OIEH =Y.,.,,,.,; .;,e".e..,. .",.,F ,w.d.:. .^,,...«:„;...,pJ:;.Ss. „,t�,;:. µaµd uu t% ,.,..),._ ......:.� .,:_,.a JF. ,r. o ,..J" >./ Pti3 •�a:;,,..,e;.,w..,�:„^ sm:,>.,:,.�c_:s;, ,,.:M•:,�;.7. ,\ ra[p � Y'?,G? <;rffv�." :✓••l/•1 �y � Jf'aC�; �'"W'•:`'i .7� "f•, ,7+'e'""i+'y. c w•waaow -�� - •:I 'zti.;". JS.'"`i', "'i4r•"ry,^d `'.,�'�." /�E/~ :ter e ' Jr±a�r..r„.1.%e%..y�y _ .t;_,y.�.'�, \ N .L'oif - - •'1 'I j?:M):. ���8%/j - .,�._ „,r.J-,,,_- ..:Ake. 'w"•,.S,Fv,� \ 11 4' . J J ii, \ . i' PROPOS Al OCOU• ���� /0;f: �'+ In C.;lia.fa �e ��� / eta *� `� )' 40A. n :. n;...., .;, .,,. -- �- ter, f ,,,;,.":., ;�,$� / rig,' ; �.L , ct - , �-ti si,:U.�•"t.„ 2z, •!/.,, ,s+�f,. / i.'6T:n"r,.i',4'F,•;„ • 14% :•y.Y.,_dY,•q,....J.-.,Z..m.�,.,�,5..,..ne.V�:-a:edJ,Y i.e. ,„r^,;.ur„4... ""'1?.fin�`'� __ t *,y. �::e'{xgr,r„:x .444 4 �/ ,=,ee F;.+_:.,.. ,. S .: a vas.J ..,J:.,drr"�,, ,.: ";dC` '•S:�- ; ,.;._,,.. ,.�;1,_.e _ •.r•;Fa 1. ,..r . -. . }')f; 'r,: : rrllg Sd."e.,.,"" / '�"';.. / �i .r, • x... I/f it-.. .�A2. � :sA.,.,„. ik ..__.„_,. _: �.,.�r� .�.•v,,., .aii .,._. � , ._ ?."."`"d.A•"G's$r;`.D�`L;Y;%?'+.;;:1<7::4•^JEYe"." -> ;r..l!..:.�!!.ji '+W ..:.�•^'.., - I / J. �Y�r:•aIY CIS'. Y.a • 6 r .N A , I Ca:l ' "F ,.,) .f.rla wu v SE7^i;n�+y // / • :. ' ,�(,,x.�Y�J, i.."} dY.,,•�G��} �+3-n.:,�,yp,�_,��..r•.,rv.' r„t„FF/ pie• ..r.....I ,I �i�� I' rr r j ,11 jy'S.J..3d .V'"'.ti,..py",wf,i ;e.�.„_ '"' '' .f J{•'''&Y Y V) V ....� I�l,�ti.:3.;.�d:°'',.:i s•-,1' w, V ;.b,':,_,....��WP <5..+rx'F::;w:S'Y;i..1 .'�.(A'Fir�,yx' 'V .lean. roman ..• .. .,.,. .�.+.arb`?_ ..r Y�.. •` • , • • . n•TAT w I.w.T...I.T. .., me •� • FOR PARK DEVELOR¢NT 6EE'LAND6CAPE )r( t.•orJr.0 PEDESTRIAN MALL CONNECTION ,a• +, °•' FROM BURNETT AVENUE TO PARK v .+ '•�'• s I. nu�wo.u+•i • wor•«, uoluTn • � E • '' • • a A!y FA rKlt •6 : R BURNETT PLACE SOUTH E O N 0 rn SITE PLAN 0 6te F o �oJ.a l r.,. 0 .i N nwn.saartaa)ro WOO IM KS ar•an Po wrtloe•r q tam CD O bile Plan N Approval 0 A1.1 LOGAN AVENUE SOUTH _ f tors • • 1 i (0 NNN NUMMI r u► y / .,I. MLT N:Otllu ► O C ►�� MAL COMO, VML IONSL 1R MN VTOL O4M QO.OL MN ✓a Y M• .WMCW PETAL OIIUORAC - VLRL E►DOO —I.-u►. "` • I _----- TOAtD4-Ai r Lf J __ �A�d MLY�WR1LNl1' a w 11 ®s i�..i .... .... -��e° ,,,II II ■■/I 91 1II%„ ��11 ,. •l .ai l ..� ------GA g-ff 11 f7T� - PP m 1111 -1_1= -1==l= === ==- ■■ _-�_ 1= =1 i- = ..MI. 1 ii. .."—E11'1'1.m1.11l 1I-__I1.71 1 -2- n 1. Y G — _ DM - — ��— I —_ TOsw�LPOR e.LIA�'0 V j®®® .Teal " ®®®1 . II ®® _ _ _Il 11111—== En _ __ ®® m R,L:�aL i 1 I 1 l l_Il 11 11 II 1 1 I� NTH 1 ■■ -- ---- •i -•-•••-•••- is II IS Cil r7 �_ \ \� - / II t 7';I I:; I y I;t ..I� MANIVIEll '"')`t, I7.'E.-t I�IIK 0 ■ ® _ ►T1�o'■'.Wy]LI�-ps r.' W !� �LTCCO / I ` OTiWI�LiKI" �/� O PVT PACS CPC.LOCO `-LNL Q MCP*GRADS ne?K WM0 4< f+1 NAM 1170N1/RO4?Esoauwaw Mart MCI COIL NACU 1^ 0 • BUILDING"A" ATKMG11RfIOV L+�, EAST ELEVATION o .CALL 1132..wr a O E • AMLNL1 WHILE. S NI--^ AMLNLT MOtlL!► STUCCO 3 ' w _vu+L eoMN.CI MTK40W --ARL LOOM : tr.DTp�AueMt T MK OLLVO I TB.u-Ti�- ' ---I � IIII ---___ ._ _ _ _ - - ._. . .... ....\,II-...uIIr .«. C � 1 TOP.MA_ -�-- : n. \II...11/.:: \II. .II% \II.�II/:,,;- ---,a: -•11111m.11na1-11s1i1,-1g-1-:. ■.:! I!_' nl iai u!°_ni ■■i ■■., ® il _nr •I_ us O IJB•AOAR►L.LLAI' `____ .___ —�=1= -I=1= — =1-1- -1_ ' —_—_ —_ __ _ IIIII i1 _ii1 IIIII =i 1 III IIIII. ■ 1 I"1 `I"1 IIIII TVTKw uORAI. 111 N 1G .LOOI ELL..,• ._. :f=1= -G-_._I= =1==-1= =1-1= =1_=i= 5_-1= 0 a 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑O ❑ C 0 ❑ O�❑ Q Q Q ❑ p 99 ® E O T� OITDLInIL�tT _ __ ❑ ❑ F O NL■VEL ❑ ❑ RoJ.CI Teem O � ® Id ® :' l ' IN IN l® lit ll I■ f1I f =l ii f __ �' _.-- ME�L�Ea (NJ mn►T iem a c _® I! es Au.!Lavin. �1 arl En;GI O / IYIK ALAIN ` CSCNLI LON04900R OEOEE II M► _// MLL AW�RAIL ���AAAAQQ O LIN R MINI OIWI NM YCIACTT MCI • NUL I1 IV AAII _________N Malt►AQ C,L' N BUILDING"A" sit.m°E App I WEST ELEVATION - • rov►l D1 1 3 .aLL►a�.ry A5■1 '1. L 26031 s • r 1 ,00 p A.rwar...u. • Ii iYI LClMR.WWI NM 'liCCO NO%.o.n I _ f u� y il 411.1=w nmuu C DjAW1 m y win.Atom ) rL.W...I..[ . F- 4,ar'uuu--- it 'III� ....air \I5.�III"... �6 z 11 II III ° rIll ■ 1 ❑ ❑ MEI12 o . i El 111 Fa_ 13 13 NEN El 12 4-, 4. 61 rn rtianr MM CO" �wtiw an ....... -- 1 W O MUT r..0 cm LW o Mau GRAM-- rfi4 HWO..6 o BUILDING"A" .8 NORHT ELEVATION OSCAN)3/77•.r..• Cr o 0 11 • i r Q it El -.II N.. ° ❑ ❑ JI ...I. En �'-----;or7 07; e 1 lig rn _ � ��r=e ,F :� .cim Ell El a Cli ° a El IT ...._ : , pi --- -pug . I11 N it 0) ❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ I--�,apay...�. F w u�u O I I �t1�dif�rga" hoJ.al Tarim O --�r ': woca Yw)u (V Lim O yams pup, .6m..mlm POSAWmro aBUILDING "B" WTCOrpow IL Ro o SOUTH ELEVATION e1141 Plan I S^....sanr•o Fpprowl V) 5.4 /. MOM ',lir „._. ,, ... _ ., ,:,., . .. v p CITY OF RENTON454 r &mrr�" 0' �; IA Planning/Building/Public Works 1 alNte�o1 !41 — p32w . T055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 0 i. ., 1 " °" ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED °' " 7153401 grpfl0`?A'•'"._a` . eZ 4'"lr .r._. 0 et r C.brt r er CM.-r.r M". -Cr.r .er.- F.-ter rillirc - - ... LPL :r t. T.E. • t t1L:IUll s L t Ls Et' s.1t.:.E'! Ytrt. t V.t. Richard Kaercher � ' 26828 SE 208Th St 1 Maple Valley,WA 98038 0 VilRi i L-, ,.,: . F{/' FY I 43 • Uf'd;ciaf)Y,,r('P ' AUMP 00 !!]j i 3) ,}} } ]] jj !] g jj ((EE j] jj !j ] ---••( '7 �;� `?lZ�t?1�,'.r/464 +ri'� i(i liiishillitillltilf ill{Ilidliulllitlliililtilil ills 1 OS�Y 04. � .rt NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: January 15,2001 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-00-171,SA-H,ECF APPLICATION NAME: 95 BURNETT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed project will include the demolition of Lande Feed Mill and several other small commercial buildings located onsite to construct a four-story apartment structure containing 118 dwelling units. The first floor will contain structured parking with 164 stalls. Vehicular access is via Burnett Avenue South. The property is zoned Center Downtown(CD). The proposed project will include thinning trees in the adjacent park and the addition of a small plaza to create pedestrian connections to Burnett Avenue South and to the building lobby area. Additionally,the project will remove two underground storage tanks. One tank is located onsite;the other is located just off-site on park property. PROJECT LOCATION: 73,77 and 95 Burnett Avenue South OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS,M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non- Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: December 21,2000 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: January 15,2001 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Hearing Examiner Site Plan Approval. Other Permits which may be required: Demolition Permits,Construction Permit,Building Permit,Underground Storage Tank Removal Permits. Requested Studies: Geotechnical engineering report,traffic impact analyses,surface water drainage analysis. Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing scheduled for March 13,2001 before the Renton Hearing Examiner in Renton Council Chambers. Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on the 7th floor of the new Renton City Hall located at 1055 Grady Way South. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: • Land Use: Center Downtown(CD) Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Traffic Impact Analysis,Geotechnical Engineering Study,Drainage Technical Information Report and the Environmental.Checklist. Environmental Associates,Inc.report dated February 10,2000,Subsurface Sampling&Testing. Geotech Consultants,Inc.report dated May 28,1999,Underground Storage Tank Location and Soil Sampling. Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The project will be subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance,City of Renton Municipal Code,Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,King County Surface Water Design Manual and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. to NOTICE OF APPLICATION Proposed Mitigation Measures: 1. The applicant shall comply with recommendations of the Earth Consultant Inc.geotechnical study prepared for the site. 2. All underground storage tanks associated with the development shall be removed and any soil contamination abated per Department of Ecology regulations prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $388 per new multi-family unit. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to issuance of a building permit. • 4. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average daily trip associated with the. project. The required mitigation shall be paid prior to issuance of a building permit. 5. The applicant shall pay a Parks Department mitigation fee of$354.51 per new multi-family unit. The required mitigation fee shall be paid prior to issuance of a building permit. 'Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Steve Taylor,AICP,Project Manager,Development Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on February 6,2001. This matter is also tentatively scheduled for a public hearing on March 13,2001,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Seventh Floor,Renton City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division,(425)430-7282,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,please contact the project manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: STEVE TAYLOR (425)430-7219 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION 11 3:11PS:t.: CONI CPCI•L ... �.'���}-1'n:� Ay E. \ `,Ill I \ 4' \ �,�_O �,� �� 1.1:. .:=. ._" Iil: 11 "illinni .7;1;7' Itt 'N I..4'4N?? . v 'Filiiiiiii IA II 111 Iiirilligi 2S4-- .r---r4 . N4 -\• . VF:t ''• 1 :P: .' EaLl '=-' '9 ; it 7 :��r�� S) !�® _. _,9-r' �'Y ���j, � � •m Nryr�'a � •n14°1" ` L��•' I D ' 11�s1 y 111: t G� 44N4.1°'.;e• �TF 0411 r :..' ` �`� r. • • f`s, it .•\ o Wry , NM �,, [ "4- i N szw. ,,•';K =El. • '. 1 'wiE' == . .1: 5F Jan VC. \ N,-°,; ..,. ..,'' - :WIN' ,.-•, L SECOND 22 a S. ,,,,,, 2. DC , /„•/ „ , I pIl�l1�ll lEi,a i_ .n.. ., *4 SIT• '''�d1 s' .SO NOTICE OF APPLICATION a 4, CITY OF RENTON a ei) -,,• ,44. .4.T.,1 •ST 41 raw.....amerrrt• ..':-.. Planning/Building/Public Works iota (11 f.... 4 rplertej CC 0-4 A .t..70 ea el 7 el o JAN 1 60 1 fF,54.)-:4 - U -7 C 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 co t•-• - " 1, LL, CA CC = PO riUti..;3 . ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED 12. ir.. 7150461 ti:..S• Ft/rill"474g 4d.-r- 0,4 PRE ol ma Tr-ri Ft tor cat.--ek rrtY" 0 CI 4- 42,1J. Za.t. WI, utitt-ti Ft.4.t.t tz-Ln vet, Ful ,Ro Bert ( , ° 't4.1.-280 Hardie Ave SW . _ r'r,-.,Rentoll,WA 98055 ..... _._. ' .11 (6, _ 1 toiikeilif-di3Viici _ , Jul ,c8. i. ,i‘" • P i gRa,. — RETURN TO SENDER - ilillibillibliJilifillifiliii -. 3-i L Y •:::•::.• •.... •...•• iiiiiiiiiiffiihnithilhiiiiiihliiiiiilliiii - — I OrcY 0 + 5 . + NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: January 15,2001 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-00-171,SA-H,ECF APPLICATION NAME: 95 BURNETT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed project will include the demolition ofLande Feed Mill and several other small commercial buildings located onsite to construct a four-story apartment structure containing 118 dwelling units. The first floor will contain structured parking with 164 stalls. Vehicular access is via Burnett Avenue South. The property is zoned Center Downtown(CD). The proposed project will include thinning trees in the adjacent park and the addition of a small plaza to create pedestrian connections to Burnett Avenue South and to the building lobby area. Additionally,the project will remove two underground storage tanks. One tank is located onsite;the other is located just off-site on park property. • PROJECT LOCATION: 73,77 and 95 Burnett Avenue South • OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS,M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non- Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: December 21,2000 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: January 15,2001 • Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Hearing Examiner Site Plan Approval. Other Permits which may be required: Demolition Permits,Construction Permit,Building Permit,Underground Storage Tank Removal Permits. • Requested Studies: Geotechnical engineering report,traffic impact analyses,surface water drainage analysis. Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing scheduled for March 13,2001 before the Renton Hearing Examiner in Renton Council Chambers. Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on the 7th floor of the new Renton City Hall located at 1055 Grady Way South. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use: Center Downtown(CD) Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Traffic Impact Analysis,Geotechnical Engineering Study,Drainage Technical Information Report and the Environmental Checklist. Environmental Associates,Inc.report dated February 10,2000,Subsurface Sampling&Testing. Geotech Consultants,Inc.report dated May 28,1999,Underground Storage Tank Location and Soil Sampling. Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The project will be subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance,City of Renton Municipal Code,Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,King County Surface Water Design Manual and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. te NOTICE OF APPLICATION Proposed Mitigation Measures: 1. The applicant shall comply with recommendations of the Earth Consultant Inc.geotechnical study prepared for the site. 2. All underground storage tanks associated with the development shall be removed and any soil contamination abated per Department of Ecology regulations prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $388 per new multi-family unit. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average daily trip associated with the. project. The required mitigation shall be paid prior to issuance of a building permit. 5. The applicant shall pay a Parks Department mitigation fee of$354.51 per new multi-family unit. The required mitigation fee shall be paid prior to issuance of a building permit. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Steve Taylor,AICP,Project Manager,Development Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on February 6,2001. This matter is also tentatively scheduled for a public hearing on March 13.2001,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Seventh Floor,Renton City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division,(425)430-7282,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted In writing by the date Indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,please contact the project manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: STEVE TAYLOR (425)430-7219 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION EON ERC1•l. • �i7}.!,174;� AVE. \ ` N. r� j 1~ n, o _,..iiiIii r u s 4, Iv rN P,4 - aglitita 1E1 ME i -- .limani r/ I ,. - 16: I , ,.•..` � ri.tti: r(�al�< ir.: ma • n ef "1"44"ijtiii °2 11 111IMMal iOd1 ` l =:, f f—>r7 Mitt n ,, Oa r � " a 4' . KF�iI , •'. fen. jj Ve•• \�' �,`I . e - M ,,y'' r •n:, ` , — coy ., ..si „.1..... , ,4-'TA' , ... ...• 0 .0.. - .&" 11112 al 11• . tt...., N.:' 4,:'.4e6i Ar. 94: " . _•LIikyr r • . ��a )"7- v447,4 A fed < 1 = `� �. ,..�jl^.a �•' " �'• ` `���� -eat wti�.. MF'3. j •✓6 t• '' it . gy`►• c,4 V , :� � F �� .�,r� pc, Ni ' -r'•. + . 1 .. '`,- . 1 � t '' ✓, - • 1®gym. • • ,... .. 7/ Merl 4 1'7 - lei Wer‘74,i -"..,,tar .714--A4 •, •EEO NO •[ _.....m. ....... . 'V i S. ,..,.. a. J[ ,M./ ... . (Wm;!/.I.•Cwly.Ol,}r 1I 6p.��{E!'71 'lN.•'._•...... S`A I I \!I _- Ir$ $ '1 macaw.' 8,..�•4. .' m ''_�NitfC Y mama - mini IL aA._. 1:59115-`..•p ,_, ', ,I, n• ' ' v, sue' N /RJll, /n w A.' f NOTICE OF APPLICATION l ,Smooth Feed She-e uM (5-u — 1-i i zve•-•s. use template for 51bu' Allingham Family Limited Partnership American Legion Post#19 Robert Anderson PO Box 48117 1308 Beacon Way S 316 Capt Gray Ct SE Seattle,WA 98148 Renton,WA 98055 Ocean Shores,WA 98569 Walter&Sharon Austin Ro Bert G Robert Bird 14823 47Th Ave E 280 Hardie Ave SW 8722 S 121St St Tacoma,WA 98446 Renton,WA 98055 Seattle,WA 98178 Pyuong Su&Robert Bonner Sr. Northrn Santa Fe Burlington Louis Caniparoli 518 S Tobin St 1700 E Golf Rd#400 84 Logan Ave S - Renton,WA 98055 Schaumburg,IL 60173 , Renton,WA 98055 City Of Renton Robert Cooper City Hall 200 Mill Ave S 87 Williams Ave S Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 Alex Cugini Jr. James&Renee Dawson Donald Erue 611 Renton Ave S 10838 Lake Ridge Dr S S . 14415 12Th Ave SW Renton,WA 98055 Seattle,WA 98178 Seattle,WA 98166 Eugene Frasier&F Severyns Christine Edo Gebenini&Kathleen Struznik Darreld&Nancy Gudmunson PO Box 836 106 Logan Ave S 102 Lake Ave S Renton,WA 98057 Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 Ruby Heitman&Sandra Heitman-Boden Authority Housing Richard Kaercher 50 Logan Ave S PO Box 2316 26828 SE 208Th St Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98056 Maple Valley,WA 98038 Jerry&Janice King John&Jackie Knipp-el 31620 176Th Ave SE 97 Logan Ave S Auburn,WA 98092 Renton,WA 98055 Terry Kowing Robert&Ariita Kramer 109 Logan Ave S 355 Rainier Ave N Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 Philip Lande Mclendon Hardware Inc Aaron&Lynda Mcluen-- 9037 38Th Ave SW 710 S 2Nd St 117 Burnett P1 S Seattle,WA 98126 Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 1 , I ilgOt1 . Smooth Feed SheetsTM 1 1 iiiit V i - 11 Bertha Miller ' Pan's Development Corporation I I 1109 N 37Th St 6947 Coal Creek Pkwy SE#260 I 1 Renton,WA 98056 Newcastle,WA 98059 I 1 I .) '- - — • - , William Provin Glenn Reynolds 81 Logan Ave S 55 Logan Ave S Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 , . ! ' ' < , . ) , ' Margaret Schmidt Les Sherrill 1 T 7136 S Sunnycrest Rd 140 Kailuana Loop I I I Seattle,WA 98178 Kailua,HI 96734 . I I . . _ I Richard Stauff Tennessee Group L L C I 13813 139Th Ave SE 710 S 2Nd St III Renton,WA 98059 Renton,WA 98055 I I . , ---. , 1 I Grace&Russell Storwick Angelo M P&Dora Lee Righi ' ' PO Box 78327 ' 1109 N 37Th St , Seattle,WA 98178 ; Renton,WA 98056 I li 1• ).L- - - - I ' _ , ..- R E Storwick ' John Allen& Carol Veness 1 PO Box 78327 . 36 Logan Ave S 1 Seattle,WA 98178 I Renton,WA 98055 \ ,- — Salvation Army John&Juliet Tharp -1 PO Box 9219 Arthur Watanabe Seattle,WA 98109 423 S 3Rd St Renton,WA 98055 I ' ' Edith Pringle Mary Lou Sigette ) 117 Logan Ave S 116 Logan Ave S Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 -- Violet Meakin ' ( 7100 S Taft St Seattle,WA 98178 < , I ( . I 1 ,--- 1 6, AVERY® Address Labels i i 1 Laser 5960TM klivroN ♦ ® ♦ J�li�l p 7 2004 CITY OF RENTON CITY CLERK DIVISION MEMORANDUM DATE: January 6, 2004 TO: Jason Jordan FROM: Suzann Lombard x6521 SUBJECT: Removal of Restrictive Covenants Philip Lande—95 Burnett Ave S. Rec#20031216004211 Beverly Starkovich 95 Burnett Ave S. Rec#20031216004212 The attached documents have been recorded with King County and are being returned to you. Please forward copies to parties of interest, and retain a copy for your file. A copy Removal of Restrictive Covenant will be placed with the original Restrictive Covenant and will be cross-referenced upon indexing. Thank you. Attachments: (2) r After recording return to: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE 1055 S. GRADY WAY RENTON,WA 98055 20031216004211 CITY OF RENTON R 21.00 PAGE001 OF 003 12/16/2003 21:04 KING COUNTY, WA • DOCUMENT TITLE: Removal of Restrictive Covenant REFERENCE NUMBER OF RELATED DOCUMENT: 20020516000477 GRANTOR(S): City of Renton, a municipal corporation ADDITIONAL GRANTOR(S)ON PAGE: N/A GRANTEE(S): Lande,Philip ADDITIONAL GRANTEE(S) ON PAGE: N/A ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portion of Henry H.Tobin Donation Land Claim No. 37, in Sec. 18,Twnshp 23 N, Range 5 E of the W.M., City of Renton,King County, Washington. ADDITIONAL LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON PAGE(S): Exhibit"A" ASSESSOR'S TAX PARCEL NUMBER(S): 000720007301 REMOVAL OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT COMES NOW, City of Renton, and hereby removes the Restrictive Covenant set forth on that particular instrument dated March 28, 2002, and recorded on May 16, 2002,under King County Recording Number 20020516000477,by and between Philip Lande, as Grat'ntor, and the Public as Grantee. Said instrument affects the real property described in Exhibit"A" attached hereto. DATED this PP' day of nt,"0-014 , 2003. CITY OF RENTON Olommftv Gf 2calet"44. 0# By: SEAL _ Mayo esse Tanner sar 44.4 ATTEST: NJ. Idaete-74-) ��/!lllllllilltll1111\\\\\\\\\ �/����� Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk REMOVAL OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS- 1 Y ' - , STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) On this day of 10 v , 2003,before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn,personally appeared Jesse Tanner, to me known to be the Mayor of the City of Renton, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said City of Renton, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. �f .-' ~.� Pn ed Name{:=�Jc cu��� D.4V6Ztli4V1 iar -41 . ' NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State , • i of Washington,residing at: � ' ,,.r, a. .� My commission expires: � 9 �' z. REMOVAL OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS-2 ► I • Exhibit"A" Lam_Property • THAT PORTION OF THE DONATION LAND CLAIM OF DIANA B WITHERS,FAMILY OF DIANA B TOBIN, A WIDOW, AND THE HEIRS AT LAW OF HENRY H TOBIN, DECEASED,DESIGNATED AS CLAIM NO 37,LOCATED IN PARTS OF SECTIONS 17. 18 AND 20IN TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,RANGE 5 EAST,WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN,IN KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON,DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS BEGINNING AT A POINT 60 FEET WEST OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 24 • OF THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN- VOLUME I OF PLATS,PAGE 135,IN KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON,THENCE SOUTH 16 5 FEET,THENCE WEST 109 5 FEET TO THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY,THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY 300 FEET, THENCE EAST 109 5 FEET,THENCE SOUTH 283 5 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPT THE NORTH 62 FEET THEREOF 1 After recording return to: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE 1055 S. GRADY WAY 20031216004212 RENTON, WA 98055 CITY OF RENTON R PAGE001 OF 003 21.00 12/18/2003 21:04 KING COUNTY, UA DOCUMENT TITLE: Removal of Restrictive Covenants REFERENCE NUMBER OF RELATED DOCUMENT: 20020516000478 GRANTOR(S): City of Renton, a municipal corporation ADDITIONAL GRANTOR(S) ON PAGE: N/A GRANTEE(S): Starkovich,Rudy and Starkovich,Beverly, as assigned to the Starkovich Revocable Trust U/A/D June 15, 2001, and Beverly Starkovich, a widow. ADDITIONAL GRANTEE(S) ON PAGE: N/A ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portion of Henry H. Tobin Donation Land Claim No. 37,in Sec. 18,Twnshp 23 N,Range 5 E of the W.M., City of Renton,King County, Washington. ADDITIONAL LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON PAGE(S): Exhibit"A" ASSESSOR'S TAX PARCEL NUMBER(S): 000720007509 and 000720014802 REMOVAL OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS COMES NOW, City of Renton, and hereby removes the Restrictive Covenants set forth on that particular instrument dated March 28, 2002, and recorded on May 16, 2002, under King , County Recording Number 20020516000478,by and between Rudy Starkovich, and Beverly Starkovich, as assigned to the Starkovich Revocable Trust U/A/D June 15, 2001, and Beverly Starkovich, a widow, as Grantors, and the Public as Grantee. Said instrument affects the real property described in Exhibit"A" attached hereto. DATED this /7 day of , 2003. CITY OF RENTON By: I*( SEAL *r May r Jesse Tanner v ‘iciti ATTEST: %' rio sx�\�ti` zoNtllfA0111111\1\\\ • )6O y1_ 4- r . t(.h2 Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk REMOVAL OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS- 1 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) , p On this i `1 ` day of N v V'C,rr-6 r , 2003, before me,the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Jesse Tanner, to me known to be the Mayor of the City of Renton, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said City of Renton, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument. WITNESS my hand;'.• +. :'cial seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. . " Z Prin ed Name: �Vt an/t • �"4" katt"e---* a 4,1-ev-.0 d NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the tate A ! , 0 ;of Washington, residing at: act- e, ball. 7.7:7,;'h' My commission expires: 9 0, REMOVAL OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS-2 • • Exhibit°A° Starkovich Property PARCEL A: • BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY WHICHPOINT IS WEST 169 5 FEET AND NORTH 283 5 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 24, TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF,RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 01F PLATS,PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON . • • THENCE RUNNING NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE 216 5 FEET, THENCE AT RIGHT ANGLES EASTERLY 109 5 FEET TO A POINT IN THE WESTERLY LINE OF BURNETT STREET, EXTENDED,THENCE SOUTIIERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LIKE OF BURNETT STREET EXTENDED. 216 5 FEET, THENCE WESTERLY 109 5 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,ALL OF WHICH LIES BETWEEN THE RIGHT OF WAY OF.THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD AND THE WESTERLY LINE OF BURNETT STREET EXTENDED AND IS PART OF THE ORIGINAL HENRY H TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO 37, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN,IN KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON • PARCEL B: • THE NORTH 62 FEM.Of'THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY THAT PORTION OF THE HENRY H• TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO 37, BEING PARTS OF SECTIONS 17, 18 AND 20 IN TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, 'WILLAMh11b MERIDIAN, 1N KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS ; FOLLOWS . BEGINNING AT A POINT 60 FEET WEST OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 24, TOWN OF RENTON.ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF,RECORDED IN VOLUME OF PLATS,PAGE 135,IN KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON,THENCE SOUTH 16 5 FEET, THENCE WEST 109 5 FEET TO THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY RIGHT OF WAY, THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE 300 FEET; THENCE EAST 109 5 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 283 5 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF • - BEGINNING • ;L.1 1 ) fir _ r.l'1l 1 vlr .,.�� Hearing Examiner Fred J.Kaufman Jesse Tanner,Mayor May 29, 2003 TSA Architects,PLLC Kent Smutny,Manager 50— 116th Avenue SE, Suite 201 Bellevue, WA 98004 Dear Mr. Smutny: This office has reviewed your.request to extend your permit. • The reasons stated appear to justify granting a one-year extension and the permit will expire on May 7, 2004. This office is empowered to permit one such extension. If work does not progress sufficiently in the next calendar year another extension shall not be approved. If this office can be of further assistance,please feel free to write. Sincerely, Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner City of Renton DEVVLOPMF Cm'OF R N oNNJNc; Rr FJKInt • RECEIVED Cc: Mr. David Hoy,HMI Real Estate Mr. Larry Meckling, Building Official, City of Renton LMr! son Jordan,Planner, City of Renton • 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055-(425)430-6515 R E N T O N C. AHEAD OF THE CURVE :: This paper contains50%recycled material,30°/post consumer to i 1 010 441 41— TS A architects, p.l.l.c. .Co •fr P Cl May 5, 2003 0�.ern if jq y8 1oMti%G 6!4 � J Jennifer Henning S, City of Renton C1.) Department of Planning/Building/Public Works 1055 S. Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 Re: 95 Burnett Project Number: LUA-00-171, SA-H, ECF 50 1166 Avenue S.E. Proposed Building Revisions Suite 201 Bellevue,WA Dear Ms. Henning: 98004 This letter is being sent in response to your notification dated May 2, 2003 that T 425.401.6828 unless an extension is requested our land use application for this project will expire F 425.401.0630 on May 7,2003. We are currently working with a new client, David Hoy with HMI Real Estate, who has been working to move this project forward since December of last year. In December of 2002 Mr. Hoy and myself met with Larry Meckling about building permits on the project and since that time HMI has been working with the city on establishing the necessary easements that are required as part of the project. In the meantime we have been working with HMI Real Estate on making changes to the condominium units in order to meet the projected market requirements of downtown Renton. We request that the Land Use Application for this project be extend while we work towards resubmitting for building permits. We project application will be made by next month,June of 2003. The client's current schedule is to start construction by late summer of this year or as soon as building permits can be issued by the city. 200236_corr_juris_5-5-03.doc 010 Please let me know if there is any additional information that I need to provide you in order to allow this Land Use Permit to be extended. Sincerely, TSA Architec , LLC Kent Smutny,Manager Cc: Mr. David Hoy, HMI Real Estate Larry Meckling,Building Official, City of Renton Jason Jordan,Planner, City of Renton 200236_corr_juris_5-5-03.doc --•T- j CIT' OF REIN LL Planning/Building/PublicWorks 7 Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,A May 2, 2003 Kent Smutny Thomas Harkey Architects 13400 Northup Way, #30 Bellevue,WA 98005 SUBJECT: Expiration of City of Renton Land Use Application 95 Burnett/Project No. LtJA-00-171,SA-H,ECF Dear Mr. Smutny: This letter is being sent as a courtesy to advise you of the expiration date for the above referenc use application. The expiration date is May 7, 2003. However, it may be possible to obtain an extension if you rE this prior to the expiration date. The land use approval is separate and distinct from any building or public works permit you may Therefore, if you have already obtained all necessary City permits this may not be a concern to provided the building or construction permits remain valid and do not lapse at any time. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425)430-7286. Sincerely, Jennifer enning Principal Planner cc: Philip Lande, Rudy& Beverly Starkovich/Owners, PDSK Properties Inc./Applicant- R. Anarde, C. Berry, A. McLuen, K. King, A. Slemko, R. Perterson, D. Palmer/Parties of exk,ired.dut R E 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 AHEAD C," This paper contains 50%recycled material.30%post consumer l., , LvtA-00/71 • • • City to rs'`'..© i :._ Ei r,of egtctn Rentori.,WAx49 8D.55.y • 2002051.6000478 CITY OF RENTON DPC 13.00 PAGE 001 OF 00S 05/ 6/2002 10:39 KIN COUNTY, WA • DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT Grantor: Rudy Starkovich and Beverly Starkovich, as assigned to the Starkovich Revocable Trust U/AID June 15, 2001, and Beverly Starkovich, a widow Grantee: The Public Reference Numbers of Documents Assigned or Released: c Legal Description(abbreviated):Portion of Henry H.Tobin Donation Land Claim No.37,in Section 18, Township 23 North, Range 5 East of the W.M., City of Renton, King County, Washington. c Complete Legal Description is located on Exhibit "A" of document o. Assessor's Tax Parcel Numbers: 000720007509 and 000720014802 This Declaration of Restrictive Covenants is executed this ,28 day of March, 2002,by c.e and between Rudy Starkovich and Beverly Starkovich, as assigned to the.Starkovich Revocable NTrust U/A/D June 15,2001,and Beverly Starkovich,a widow,hereinafter referred to as"Declarants" according to the terms and conditions set forth herein. Recitals: 1. That the Declarants are the owners of certain real property situated in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, which property is legally described • on Exhibit "A attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein, and that said property for purposes' of this declaration shall be referred to as the "Starkovich Property". 2. That the Declarants have entered into a contract to sell with PDSK Properties, Inc. and that, at the time of closing of said sale, said property will be taken in the name • of 95 Burnett, L.L.C., a Washington limited,liability company. • • Declaration of Restrictive Covenants ,Page 1 of 5 11DATAAD\BHD\MIKRAKOWW95 Burnett,LLL1Declamtion of Restrictive Covenant for Statkovic a I 3. That said 95 Burnett, L.L.C. is acquiring the Starkovich Property for the purpose of constructing a 118 unit condominium complex with respect to said property, subject to such plans and specifications as shall be approved by the City of Renton and other appropriate regulatory agencies. 4. That in order to comply with certain ordinances of the City of Renton in connection with the permitting process of said condominium development, the Declarants have agreed to restrict the use of the Starkovich Property according to the terms and provisions of this declaration. Now,therefore,for good and valuable consideration, the Declarants do hereby declare and state as follows: A. That the Starkovich Property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto shall be restricted for development and construction purposes to that of constructing a 118 unit condominium development in accordance with the Washington Condominium Act. That this restriction shall run with the property and shall bind the Declarants, their heirs, successors and assigns, unless said restriction is terminated by written instrument executed by the then owner of the property and consented to by the City of Renton in accordance with the terms and provisions of this declaration. B. That this restriction shall bind with and shall run the land and also shall be binding upon the parties hereto, their heirs, successors and assigns. era C. That in the event for any reason the Declarants shall not sell and convey the property described in Exhibit"A"to PDSK Properties,Inc. and/or 95 Burnett, L.L.C.,then the 0 Declarants can request that the City of Renton consent to the execution of an = instrument revoking and removing this restriction from the property and upon receiving such application, the City of Renton shall execute such termination of n restriction which shall be necessary in order to remove this restriction from the ' property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto (Starkovich Property). ry t D. " That the terms and provisions set forth herein are binding upon the parties hereto, their heirs, successors and assigns. Starkovich Revocable Trust U/A/D < By: Beverly Stark vi i 1-1-ej Beverly Starkovich Declaration of Restrictive Covenants page 2 of 5 IADATAID\BHDVdW C\tAKON995 Burnett,LLDeclar.Non of Rcstrictivc Corcnant for Starkovich ! il . . PDSK P i a ..,nc. \141111 . By: �•- . AUL kR tKou), President 95 Burnett, L.L..in . �By:, PA U I. ''v7y Koh, Manager City of ',,`'ion By: , f. y r #16,44"4"....'" Its: = 'or STATE OF WASHINGTON ) § Attu. _62 , COUNTY OF-3� ' t NI G' ) Bonnie I.Wale"aty clerk On this day personally appeared before me Beverly Starkovich, individually and for the Starkovich Revocable Trust U/A/D,to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that she signed the same as her free and • voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under. \d and official seal this day of March, 2002. cr g OTARy T•• 13 ro Printed t'v '"Name: o� f� ° n ►�i� i s o CD 1 NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of II PUBLIC ' J Washington,residing at R e-vt w tt's�.y r-1 9-0� My commission expires: I/— ►9i — 0�— spa (1%\,aOFV1/H�'�-- c3 STATE OF WASHING ft N` ) -`" )§ COUNTY OF PIERCE ) • On this (..qg day of March, 2002, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and j the State of\ Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared `CG(L !\/RA Koch to me known to be the President of PDSK Properties, Inc.,the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation,for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they are authorized to execute the said instrument. . Declaration of Restrictive Covenants I:IDATAIDIBHD\M\KRAKOWr95 Burnett,LLC\Declaration of Restrictive Covenant for Starkovichpage 3 of 5 iiI WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. tom. -,.ALA®4.1_-`^,®d. .A 4 Notary Public ! 4Printed ~State of Washington ! Name: DAPHNE S.YOUNG i NOTARY PUBLIC i _and for the Sta of My Appointment Expires Feb. 1,2006 Washington,residing at f/4''0//yf/9 : . r,. .�n .x :;.w, •,:-;• My commission expires: (51 / )0 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ` )§ COUNTY OF PIERCE ) On thisc;23(-day of March, 2002, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and the ate of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared 4U L /Mk%G to me known to be the Manager of 95 Burnett, L.L.C., the limited liability company that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said limited liability company, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they are authorized to execute the said instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto d the da and ye first above written. Notary Public State of Washington i f DAPHNE S.YOUNG Printed Nam : ,Agio,Lf/,LC a. 5- ila __ My Appointment Expires Feb. 1,2006 NOTARY PUBLIC in and`for the Sifate of Washington,residing at "fja} ' My commission expires: (0/O0 -...it , STATE OF WASHINGTON ) cz )§ — COUNTY OF PEE ) kry On this 19th day of'April,2002, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and ca for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared . Jesse Tanner , to me known to be the Mayor of the City of Renton, and •tN acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said City of Renton, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they are authorized to execute the said instrument. . WIT S4riyghand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. oht, . D. • •. %% ti .'O AR}, Print Name: Suzann D. Lombard i • romawm Eli: j NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of 0� o Washington,residing at Seattle Np =.. ,./ r,tar My commission expires: 9/9/05 Declaration of Restrictive Covenants page 4 of 5 I:IDATA'D16HD\? KRAKOW195 Burnett,LLC\Dcclaration of Restrictive Covcnant for Storkovich 4 Exhibit "A" Starkovich Property PARCEL A: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY WHICH POINT IS WEST 169.5 FEET AND NORTH 283.5 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 24, TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON THENCE RUNNING NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE 216.5 FEET; THENCE AT RIGHT ANGLES EASTERLY 109.5 FEET TO A POINT IN THE WESTERLY LINE OF BURNETT STREET, EXTENDED; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LIKE OF BURNETT STREET EXTENDED 216.5 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY 109.5 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,ALL OF WHICH LIES BETWEEN THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD AND THE WESTERLY LINE OF BURNETT STREET EXTENDED AND IS PART OF THE ORIGINAL HENRY H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PARCEL B: cza THE NORTH 62 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: 1 `'`� THAT PORTION OF THE HENRY H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37, BEING PARTS OF SECTIONS 17, 18 AND 20 IN TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, cZ WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS - FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 60 FEET WEST OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 24, TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE SOUTH 16.5 FEET; THENCE WEST 109.5 FEET TO THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE 300 FEET; THENCE EAST 109.5 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 283.5 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Declaration of Restrictive Covenants page 5 of 5 I:\DATA\D\BHD\M\KRAKO V 95 Barnett,LLC\Dectontion of Restrictive Covenant for Sntrkovich LZtH - Go�/ �� 'RWtur_u to: C ity 8lerk's Off-ice • :City-af-REnt©n<,. _ y sa.4y Way 1111111111111111111111 '1211ton-1 WA: 98055 20020516000477 CITY OF RENTON DPC 13.00 PAGE 001 OF 005 KING COUNTY, WA9 DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT Grantor: Philip Lande Grantee: The Public Reference Numbers of Documents Assigned or Released: © Legal Description(abbreviated):Portion of Henry H.Tobin Donation Land Claim No. 37,in Section Les 18, Township 23 North,Range 5 East of the W.M., City of Renton,King County, Washington. Complete Legal Description is located on Exhibit"A" of document o Assessor's Tax Parcel Numbers: 000720007301 EV This Declaration of Restrictive Covenants is executed this e=9 g day of March, 2002,by Philip Lande,hereinafter referred to as "Declarant" according to the terms and conditions set forth herein. Recitals: 1. That the Declarant is the owner of certain real property situated in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington,which property is legally described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein, and that said property for purposes of this declaration shall be referred to as the "Lande Property". 2. That the Declarant has entered into a contract to sell with PDSK Properties, Inc. and that, at the time of closing of said sale,said property will be taken in the name of 95 Burnett,L.L.C., a Washington limited liability company. 3. That said 95 Burnett, L.L.C. is acquiring the Lande Property for the purpose of constructing a 118 unit condominium complex with respect to said property, subject to such plans and specifications as shall be approved by the City of Renton and other appropriate regulatory agencies. Declaration of Restrictive Covenants Page 1 of 5 LIDATMERBHD11d\KRAKOVA95 Burnett,LLC1Declamtion of Restrictive Covenant for Lande 4. That in order to comply with certain ordinances of the City of Renton in connection with the permitting process of said condominium development, the Declarant has agreed to restrict the use of the Lande Property according to the terms and provisions of this declaration. Now,therefore,for good and valuable consideration,the Declarant does hereby declare and state as follows: A. That the Lande Property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto shall be restricted for development and construction purposes to that of constructing a 118 unit condominium development in accordance with the Washington Condominium Act. That this restriction shall run with the property and shall bind the Declarant,his heirs, successors and assigns, unless said restriction is terminated by written instrument executed by the then owner of the property and consented to by the City of Renton in accordance with the terms and provisions of this declaration. B. That this restriction shall bind with and shall run the land and also shall be binding upon the parties hereto,their heirs, successors and assigns. C. That in the event for any reason the Declarant shall not sell and convey the property described in Exhibit"A"to PDSK Properties, Inc. and/or 95 Burnett, L.L.C.,then the Declarant can request that the City of Renton consent to the execution of an instrument revoking and removing this restriction from the property and upon receiving such application, the City of Renton shall execute such termination of restriction which shall be necessary in order to remove this restriction from the property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto (Lande Property). D. That the terms and provisions set forth herein are binding upon the parties hereto, their heirs, successors and assigns. C12.4 r Philip Land PDS , c. By: hut_ R Kbu) , President Declaration of Restrictive Covenants Page 2 of 5 I:\DATAID\BHD\MUCRAKOW\95 Burnett,LLC\Dcclamtion of Restrictive Covenant for Lande b 95 Burnett ii .L.C. Notary Public By: • State of Washington Fl-KDtA , Manager DAPHNE S.YOUNG My Appointment Expires Feb. 1,2006 City of R-, •�•n bmirertriompurviprowirgrqs � By: Its: .;''•r STATE OF WASHINGTON ) Ate. �/ ��J_� / - � Y COUNTY OF PIERCE ) § Bowe I.Watson,City Clerk On this day personally appeared before me Philip Lande, to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. rth GIVEN under my hand and official seal this M day of March, 2002. c4dowitti Printed Name: UPc b . )H NOTARY PUBLIC in andpr the §tate of Washington,residing at ea-t _ My commission expires: CbCq STATE OF WASHINGTON ) w-- )§ COUNTY OF PIERCE ) b z On this �Jday of March, 2002, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and t'-1 for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared 4),e,4,),j ,to me known to be the President of PDSK Properties, Inc.,the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation,for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they are authorized to execute the said instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto fixed the day and y ar first above written. NotaryPublic . . ' ` (1,49 ,State of Wshin on Printed Name: �! pyA071-7/(40-7 Y /6 9t � DAPHNE S.YOUNG ' NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of • i My Appointment Expires Feb 1 2006 Washington,residing at T4-C,a,' .¢ My commission expires: c>2///e)6a Declaration of Restrictive Covenants Page 3 of 5 BDI I:IDATAIDIBMIKRAKOWM5 Burnett.LLCIDeclaration of Rcstricaive Covenant for Lande g STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )§ COUNTY OF PIERCE ) On this( -day of March, 2002, before me,the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State f Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared � {uL 4�-Ka), to me known to be the Manager of 95 Burnett, L.L.C., the limited liability company that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said limited liability company, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they are authorized to execute the said instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. Notary Public State of Washington /k)/$44ti, DAPHNE S.YOUNG • Printed N My Appointment Expires Feb. 1,2006J L u NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington,residing at a My commission expires: c-// cam• STATE OF WASHINGTON ) too )§ COUNTY OFE ) On this 1 9 th9 day of April,2002, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared r"' Jesse Tanner , to me known to be the Mayor of the City of Renton, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said City of Renton, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they are authorized to execute the said instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. t_: $©4_ ito 1,10TARv e;WO Prinf�d Name: Suzann D. Lombard °v o NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of ° ° Washington,residing at Seattle ,� My commission expires: 9/9/05 Declaration of Restrictive Covenants page 4 of 5 I:1DATAID\BIID\MKRAKOW195 Burnett,LLC\Declaration of Restrictive Covenant for Lnnde Exhibit "A" Lande Property THAT PORTION OF THE DONATION LAND CLAIM OF DIANA B. SMITHERS,FAMILY OF DIANA B. TOBIN, A WIDOW, AND THE HEIRS AT LAW OF HENRY H. TOBIN, DECEASED, DESIGNATED AS CLAIM NO. 37,LOCATED IN PARTS OF SECTIONS 17, 18 AND 20 IN TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 60 FEET WEST OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 24 OF THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE SOUTH 16.5 FEET; THENCE WEST 109.5 FEET TO THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY 300 FEET; THENCE EAST 109.5 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 283.5 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; • EXCEPT THE NORTH 62 FEET THEREOF. cm. Lni rN Declaration of Restrictive Covenants page 5 of 5 I:\DATAID\BHD\M\KRAKOW195 Burnett,LLC1Declaration of Restrictive Covenant for Lunde May 7,2001 Renton City Council Minutes Page 141 STATE LAW CHANGING COMPENSATION TO FULL FAIR MARKET VALUE AS APPRAISED BECOMES EFFECTIVE. CARRIED. ADMINISTRATIVE Derek Todd,Assistant to the Chief Administrative Officer,reviewed a written REPORT administrative report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2001 and beyond. Items noted included: * The Renton Community Foundation announced that BP donated$15,000 to support Rentennial,Renton's premier Centennial performance. BP's partnership with the Foundation,the City of Renton, and Renton Arts Plan Together(RAPT)will allow tickets to be offered free to all individuals and families,will help to defray some pageant production costs, and will also permit the production to be simulcast in a separate room thereby allowing parents to watch the program with their younger children. * A potential archeological site was uncovered during the excavation for a sanitary sewer line at Renton High School. Work on this construction project was temporarily stopped while the State Office of Historic Preservation and a consultant archeologist were contacted. Although it has not been professionally determined whether or not this is an archeologically significant site,the Renton School District has decided to relocate their sewer line so as not to disturb the site. * General Fund,Community Development Block Grant(CDBG)public service,and CDBG capital funding applications are currently available through the City of Renton for 2002 funding. All applications are due May 21'and may be downloaded from the city's web site, or obtained by calling the Human Services staff at 425-430-6650. AUDIENCE COMMENT Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney, advised citizens that Council could not hear comments related to the Lande Feed site since there is an appeal pending on the Hearing Examiner's decision regarding the matter. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY PARKER,COUNCIL SUSPEND THE RULES AND ADVANCE TO CONSENT AGENDA ITEM 7.c. REGARDING THIS MA1TER. CARRIED. Consent Agenda Item 7.c. . City Attorney recommended dismissal of the appeal of the Hearing Appeal: 95 Burnett Ave. S. Examiner's decision regarding the 95 Burnett Ave. S. site approval application Project(Lande Feed Mill Site), (SA-00-155),demolition of Lande Feed Mill and construction of a four-story SA-00-4155,. I, s apartment structure (118 units). The appeal, filed by Daniel Palmer raised no issues concerning the site plan approval and was untimely for SEPA or historical preservation policy issues. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY CLAWSON,COUNCIL DISMISS THE APPEAL. CARRIED. Citizen Comment:Horton— Barbara B.Horton, co-president of the Renton Historical Society,20613 SE Lande Feed Building 291'P1.Kent, 98042,expressed her views regarding the Lande Feed Mill Preservation preservation; the King County resource inventory database; the City's land use policies; and the King County Landmarks and Preservations Office interlocal agreement. Ms.Horton stated that Renton's Comprehensive Plan contains eight policies that obligate the City to protect its historic resources;however, the City has no ordinances in place to support the policies. She urged Council to adopt ordinances related to historic preservation. • C.. - OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA Bal., AI #: 7, ei• • For Agenda of: May 7, 2001 • Dept/Div/Board.. Executive/City Clerk Staff Contact Marilyn Petersen, City Clerk/Cable Mgr (X6502) Agenda Status Consent XX Subject: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's Decision; 95 Burnett Public Hearing... Avenue S. Site Approval Application; PDSK Properties, Inc. (Lande Feed Site); File No. LU-00- 155, SA-H, ECF Exhibits: New Business • Letter from City Attorney Study Sessions Correspondence from Hearing Examiner and City Clerk Information Appeal Hearing Examiner's Report Recommended Action: Council concur Approvals: Legal Dept Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. An appeal of the Hearing Examiner's decision, dated April 12, 2001, on the 95 Burnett Avenue S. site approval (Lande Feed site) for demolition of Lande Feed Mill to construct a four-story apartment structure (118 units) was filed with the City Clerk on April 26, 2001, by Daniel Palmer, 16638 106th Street SE, Renton 98055. By letter dated May 2,2001, the City Attorney has issued an opinion that the any appeal should have been from the development regulations adopted pursuant to the comprehensive plan for failure to adopt a historical preservation policy. He further advises that the time for making that appeal is long past for either the historical preservation policy adoption or a SEPA appeal, and Mr. Palmer's appeal raises no issues concerning the approval of the site plan. Therefore, it is recommended that the appeal be dismissed. • STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Dismiss the appeal filed by Daniel Palmer. Document2/ • •cA ,: : • CITY OF RENTON Office of the City Attorney Lawrence J.Warren Jesse Tanner,Mayor C7,90)-4)--v • MEMORANDUM P To: Renton City Council From: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date: May 2, 2001 Subject: :Palmer Appeal on the Historical Significance of Lande Feed • I have been provided with•a copy of the Palmer appeal concerning the historical significance of Lande Feed. For the reasons contained within this letter, it is my advice to you that this appeal should be dismissed immediately and without a hearing. ' Basically, Mr. Palmer's appeal -claims that the Lande -Feed building is of historical significance and should .be preserved. Much of his argument is made concerning our comprehensive plan policies regarding historical significance. However, at the present time, those comprehensive plan policies are:aspirational and have not resulted in any development regulations or a city historical preservation policy. '-If there was an appeal, it should have been from the development regulations adopted pursuant to the comprehensive plan, for failure to adopt a historical preservation policy. • However,the time for making that appeal is long past. • . . • , Perhaps-the greatest problem with the appeal is that it directly.contradicts the record before the . ._ . • •Hearing Examiner.• Mr. Palmer did not participate before the Hearing.Examiner. :Instead,the staff - introduced evidence that.there are only three (3) properties in Renton listed on King County's register of historical places, and Lande Feed is not one of them. • Should the Council allow this appeal to go forward, under the current appeal rules, Mr. Palmer would not be able to introduce any of his testimony, nor would he be able to argue from it. Rather he would be left with the statement that is directly contradictory to his present position. Ultimately, there could only be one result from such an appeal and,that would be for the Council to affirm the Hearing Examiner's decision. • - _Finally, Mr.;Palmer'.s .appeal is untimely and Mr..Palmer's appeal raises no issues.concerning the . approval of the site plan. However,:the approval of the site plan is what is being appealed. I have ' already discussed why his :appeal-is ,untimely as:.it:relates :to the lack of a historic-preservation • .policy.:'.His appeal is:also.couched in terms'of a SEPA'appeal. However, the time for the SEPA •-appeal ran before the.Hearing Examiner's hearing on the site plan.:::--Therefore, to the extent the ,•appeal raises SEPA issues, it:is untimelyind those issues cannot be considered.::As a final matter, • :Mr. Palmer.did not allege standing:to.bring'this appeal.:'He has nod shown'how'he.will be injured : `from:the'site lan decision:''In fact,.he challenges no'specrf cs.of the site:plaii decision His c J-- - - 'i 1O 2 O1 9 5/2/01 Page 2 of injury, rather, are to the lack of a historical preservation policy, something that cannot be considered in an appeal from a site plan approval. I know this letter is somewhat unusual because it suggests that the Council dismiss an appeal before it can be heard. However, I think, under the circumstances, that there is no good reason to go forward and waste Mr. Palmer's time, as well as that of the City Council and staff. Should you desire to discuss any issue in this letter, please feel free to contact me. 941 Lawrence J. Warren LJW:tmj cc: Mayor Jesse Tanner Jay Covington Sue Carlson Gregg Zimmerman Neil Watts Jennifer Henning • T10.30:25 • „ �- CITY vF RENTON City Clerk Jesse Tanner,Mayor Marilyn J.Petersen April 30, 2001 Daniel Palmer 16638 106`h Street SE Renton, WA 98055 . Re: Appeal of Site Approval for 95 Burnett Project; PDSK Properties; LUA-00-171 Dear Mr. Palmer: This letter requests clarification of the letter you filed with this office on April 25,2001, regarding the referenced site approval request. The appeal was addressed to and forwarded to the hearing examiner,who has determined that your intention is to file an appeal with the City Council on this matter. • If your intention is to appeal the hearing examiner's decision on this matter to the City Council, a standard appeal form must accompany your letter(copy enclosed). Please complete the form by identifying the errors of law or fact upon which the appeal is based and return.the form in the envelope provided. _ If I can provide additional information,please feel free to contact me. You will receive written notice of all further action and/or meetings regarding this matter. Sincerely, • • Marilyn . sen - ' City Clerk/Cable Manager cc: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner Steve Taylor, Project Manager • 1901 200 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, Washington 98055 - (425) 430-6510/FAX (425) 430-6516 • Q4 ;� .. • , ; CITE OF RENTON 1 �� Hearing Examiner Jesse Tanner,Mayor Fred J.Kaufman e April 30,2001 Daniel Palmer 16638 106th Avenue SE Renton, WA 98055 . Re: Appeal of 95 Burnett Project LUA00-171,SA-H,ECF Dear Mr. Palmer: ' This office has reviewed your letter of April 25,2001 regarding the Lande Feed Store. Apparently,you filed this matter as an appeal of a decision regarding the redevelopment of the subject site and paid the appeal fee. This office is not directly dealing with the Lande Feed Store but rather the proposed Site Plan for the development of the underlying property and adjacent property for an apartment complex. Environmental decisions were already made that would have been appealable but an environmental appeal is now untimely. Since your appeal is not directed at any flaw in the decision to approve a Site Plan,this office sees no reason to change or modify the decision. Since an appeal fee was paid and the letter calls it an appeal,the matter will be forwarded to the City Clerk. If appropriate as an appeal of the Hearing Examiner's decision,the City Council will hold a session on this matter. • This office is generally not involved in demolition permit matters, and it may be possible that a- separate appealable decision on demolition of the existing Lande Feed Store is possible. You will have to direct proper inquiries to the Development Services Division of the City. • '. -If this office can provide further assistance,please feel free to write. Sincerely, Fred J. Kau man .. Hearing Examiner FJK:jt cc: Mayor Jesse Tanner Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Larry Warren, City Attorney Neil Watts, Development Services Steve Taylor, Development Services Parties of Record 190kL200, 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425) 430-6515 ` {.-err, ram` t1 forii1 CITY OF' TON APR 2 6 2001 ,A RECENED qot/7226c) Lo E S FICE A, r! ._ ..: . i. - - - -7. :i .s •- /'S- - _Po '/71 �� !J S -,oe 40:70":7Pa./ 0/7 ,7 or__ ---_ c` / S� / O /-7 Op/i/ - -� 800/) - - • �D� W1 ? C A2? OUO /- - 'Zl9Ery2c - _ ,•L//''7 o r7 - IC / -724 e -- .ST-0/<'/C' . ' 2. /1/.1E7. 1.57-_ . . -'-. ..-- ---.Z7 ..__S'/O/eZ------- -- . _ f7 _e_ cl)/7 - - .:G .S, ' i . c t(1-- PO 717 I flU 'I - /I . _e7�` : - ./��o� ec'/ (,9/S0. .• l/or 1/7 ye 6=.e?el.:e c..J 6-4::/ .•?-7? e- --7- 71 - - 0\,--. -/.9*-C, "%'.2•,4 , - - , `` * - , _ - - j, on ` . L�•�arm s - c� 4 4 o/e - /;S - : - cZ- _„ / acts U._,C - 6'CW7 • . - , , 0 De .0, cc=2:9 /0/7 c'L-7 C:Z ''.2,==' /Qe/2-7CLl,2-S- 'Owr -. / Ilis - o /- . - - -- - -. .6/3 - ..; 0`..! ' VA‘P: . cr=',. _ _ Zers 7_.:, -L-9/.. .ct... /4 - --e.ixe::t..-..---,--7-7 le-“=-5- : 0"-----.-. to-7. - C:76"-,-7 74-0 /! C:)4.zz. - -r>-2 -. ,. =:47,eP c ---, - (. .===-A.2 c,/ _► h :-, c' :�+-,� ':' - -- -/ .-' - - i-J 7_ , ). — •_ - 71r=!� L 0 / - '/ S .• em s ri _ -.- _- X -S76r'cg/ _ �= . /0.5.--(gv/e- 6.e:1- --,Gi‹.=)-C7 ./...70/..a/-- ./:/-7 q --_ /s_, :,-- .c_je..c.c./..//_. L._ _ _ ca r? :,_ _1(,. ca... /7cer.(y/ _ ' ,--.. e.!7'&_-_ii.-R-_-;7-„,..7-7,-t----c= -.ge., ,:...,a4.."-e: _ =:, ': _I'_7 --."4/1 --- : ccr- --s-.e / f7? "lc_ -4_ . — _ _ _-_-__ .‘_...;;--,--,--Ti7.-.,77._t_, _ -_-,__2___- :_:__z-a..-7.-S: '•2: :-7.0.-- --- - -_././X.., --7-----,Yi-c..:7::, -\-V/C-0. -r:---,--7.s ,-.- A}:e,>-;- _ '' ---7:-- ' - ' '-1. Z-",517--. • --,--- -a'S \-- -: - -c.-1,- ,:. --/ /1,--. -.-.- 7 - C7d r)-/1177-TeL-- - -- -- p ///__5'.7-_-_-_-04._c - / •__...S.D OtE'Cl- -7-___ , Y tk:1\ - k•‘11 )1\ • }\ \tk \p- (4 ) •k \141 rt Ngi) S 1 rA Qs p„- P \ • 6: 13 r \ L \ 0‘ H .) ?1) -• \ * G) )11 \ zQj -o• P 1\;6 (1)4 • . C)* r .‘ \rci H ir\)• \ I 1 �v � u.10(.76- � 6 /i ' /. 67,, cka.4.0. c.t7v.e) 4 . o c �/ `� / �� 6/c% N 77i 'C'r 5Xc/ 74 71/4 c° 77/ccz=ct- 1--7 O bLe 0 a / 44- 1 it ClqCLi Ch C 1200 . 7t(-- /-( f r`n h'1 c"-( c h I3 ? oc 4/40/1)- cE- oP - ivy- P/96-('' CC)ac-,7,e/ /221,/,-2-2c:V /6' C t 76 67 7" . _. APP_t= 70,7 ) CJ0` . SS ryz.S ) 2 2 C- 3750? >7 - --- '17 - -- - d 0 S 0 • CVO cit ?_, w 0t7z- , -V 04 3 E P DZ. 6./ Q Z_ _2 I, • `v% ez4-cpc.7 - /y9 ft/ z odi/4 Z1 ./ " d'/) c=b 27,/ cr7a", C piiptc4),)//•=y 0.119 C /...) ut(4//i0 z-e,/ p • 6/ 4/o4/ April 12,2001 OFFICE OF 1'HE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: PDSK Properties,Inc. 621 Pacific Avenue#300 Tacoma,WA 98402 File No.: LUA00-155,SA-H,ECF LOCATION: 73, 75, 77 and 95 Burnett Avenue South SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The proposed project includes the demolition of Lande Feed Mill and several small commercial buildings to construct a four-story apartment structure containing 118 dwelling units: SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on March 6,2001. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report,examining available information on file with the application,field checking the property and surrounding area;the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary-of the March 13,2001 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday,March 13,2001,at 9:21 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of ... the Renton City Hall. Parties.wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Site Plan application,proof of posting,proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: East Elevations Exhibit No.4: West Elevations Exhibit No. 5: Auto Court Elevations Exhibit No.6: Water and Sanitary Sewer Plan Exhibit No.7: Landscape Plan Exhibit No.8: Neighborhood Map Exhibit No. 9: Zoning Map Exhibit No. 10: Business Map Exhibit No. 11: Materials Board Exhibit No. 12:.. Historical Report for State of Washington Exhibit No. 13: Urban Center Design Overlay Exhibit No. 14: Notice of Infraction and 11 photos Regulations Report - 95 Burnett Project File No.: LUA00-171,SA-H,ECF April 12,2001 Page 2 The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Steve Taylor, Senior Planner,Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way,Renton,Washington 98055. This project is a 4-story, 118-unit apartment complex to be located on a 1.3-acre site on the west side of Burnett Avenue South. The project will be constructed as two buildings,3-stories of residential over a parking garage. The two halves of the building are connected at a central lobby with a second story courtyard above. The building is approximately 50 feet in height at the peak of the roof The density for the project is approximately 91 dwelling units/acre. The first floor of the building will contain structured parking with 164 stalls. The property is bordered on the west by a City park. The park currently consists of lawn and trees with a pedestrian trail. The roofline of the building intrudes slightly into the air space of the park on the west side of the building and the right-of-way on the east. Additionally,the project will remove two underground storage tanks associated with the Lande Feed Mill. Environmental studies indicated the presence of contaminated soils that will be removed prior to development. The project also includes the replacement of a sewer connection from Burnett Place S.to Burnett Avenue S. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC)issued a Determination of Non-Significance—Mitigated for the • project on February 12,2001. No appeals of the threshold determination were filed. Mitigation measures included compliance with the geotechnical consultant's recommendations,removal of the underground storage tanks under DOE regulations, abatement of any soil and water contamination identified in the environmental studies,payment of appropriate Fire,Traffic and Parks Department mitigation fees,and the implementation of a rodent abatement program. In response to a question from the Examiner,Mr.Taylor stated the contamination on the north end of the site resulted from the area having been occupied by a diesel and fuel oil distribution center up until the early 1960s. Mr. Taylor continued by reviewing the project's consistency with site plan approval criteria. The project conforms to the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies in providing mix of uses,and supporting downtown development in striving for urban density and intensity of uses. The proposed use will provide a more intensive use of an underdeveloped site and create housing opportunities. The project also provides for the multi-family mix in residential units and is located in the Downtown Core. The project incorporates pedestrian connections and open space features into its design,as well as provides structured parking for the units. Mr.Taylor stated that there have been reports of Lande Feed being a historical building. In the Historic and Archeological Resources Section of the Land Use portion of the Comprehensive Plan it states that historic and archeological resources within the City should be protected. There is no City documentation or maps that designate this property as an historical site. The property is listed on the King County Inventory,but not on their Historical Register. It is also not listed on the State of Washington's Historical Register. Continuing with his review of consistency with site plan approval criteria,Mr.Taylor discussed the project's conformance with Land Use Regulations. The site is located in the Downtown Core Area,which makes it exempt from many of the landscape,parking,setback,and lot coverage requirements. The footprint of the building will cover most of the site. The applicant has made application to the Board of Public Works for a Right-of-Way Use Permit for the air encroachment into the public right-of-way. No setbacks or landscape requirements are applied to the CD zoned properties in the Downtown Core Area,unless the property abuts residentially zoned parcels. In this instance,the property abuts residentially zoned property on the north side of the building. The applicant is proposing a 16-foot landscaped setback containing a pedestrian connection on this side of the building. The proposal includes several landscaped courtyards,as well as the development of an urban plaza within the park. Due to the close proximity of several of the park trees to the property line,there is. the potential that their root system may be damaged during construction. Staff recommends that this potential be evaluated by a certified arborist and that a report be submitted prior to approval of the building permit documenting their recommendations. ,95 Burnett Project File No.: LUA00-171,SA-H,ECF April 12,2001 Page 3 Mr.Taylor stated that there is presently a sewer line that crosses the building site from Burnett Place S.to Burnett Avenue S.where it taps into the Metro line. This sewer line will be relocated to the central portion of the building. City staff determined that the new sewer line should be placed within a sleeve so that it is protected from downward pressure. The pipe could be accessed for maintenance either from the courtyard or from the park side. Generally structures are not allowed to be built over sewer easements,but in this case staff is felt this would be the best alternative. The cost will be completely borne by the applicant. This project is subject to the Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations. A staff report was issued on March 6, 2001 describing the criteria and the project's compliance with it. The Development Services Administrator has determined that the project is in compliance. Construction activities would result in some noise,dust and traffic impacts on surrounding properties. These impacts would be limited to the construction phase of the project,which is estimated to have a total duration of approximately 16 months(April 200I to August 2002). The applicant has submitted a Construction Mitigation Plan outlining mitigation measures to be employed for minimizing.dust,noise and traffic impacts during construction. Potential short-term noise and traffic impacts from the initial construction would be mitigated by the proposed work hours of from 7:00 a.m.to 5:00 p.m.,Monday through Friday. The Environmental Review Committee did detailed evaluations concerning the types of impacts to the site itself in terms of the contamination and the tanks on the site. They were very thorough in putting conditions of approval that meet the state standards on this project,which will result in the clean up of a contaminated site. The proposed multi-family development is expected to increase property values in the vicinity of the site. Adding residential population to downtown will improve the customer base for commercial businesses,and this is also expected to increase property values. The applicant was asked to do a traffic impact analysis,which estimated that 418 additional average daily trips would be generated by the project. A Transportation Mitigation Fee of$75 per average daily trip was imposed,which is estimated to total$31,350. Both the Fire and Police Departments have indicated existing facilities are adequate to accommodate the project,subject to the applicant's payment of the necessary impact fees..The Renton School District has indicated they have adequate facilities to serve the children generated by this project. Children would attend Lakeridge Elementary,Dimmitt Jr.High and Renton High School. The proposal would redevelop and improve a site that contains deteriorating buildings,one of which was partially destroyed by a fire in'recent years.,The investment in this area and the added presence of a residential population would serve to prevent neighborhood deterioration and.blight Staff recommends approval of this project subject to the six conditions contained in the staff report. Kent Smutny,Thomas Harkey Architects, 13400 Northup Way, Suite 30,Bellevue,WA 98005 used the elevation drawings to explain the design of the building. 'He described the various types of materials using the materials board,and explained where they would be used in the building. Decorative screening will be used in the openings of the parking garage,as well as decorative landscaping along the outside garage wall. The upper three stories of the building are modulated. The portions of the building that are most forward to the street will be stucco. The areas of the building with decks that are set back father will have horizontal beveled vinyl siding in a contrasting color. The center area of the building will have vinyl shingles in another contrasting color. This will break up the building visually,so that it will appear more like two buildings on each side of the courtyard rather than only one. The building will be accented with another trim color on the railings and hip roof forms. The building roof material on the hip roofs will be composition shingle in a.complimentary color. These materials and colors will be used on all sides of the building. . 95 Burnett Project File No.: LUA00-171,SA-H,ECF April 12, 2001 Page 4 Mr. Smutny discussed the issue of the overhangs that extend from the roofline of the building. The overhangs are part of the modulation of the building,which has been carried into the roof structure. The hip roof form with overhangs creates shadow and helps provide a more interesting appearance for the building,although the overhangs extend into the right-of-way or the park side in a few locations. There are four locations on the park side and on both sides of the building where this encroachment takes place. If the overhangs were not allowed, some type of flat roof design would have to be used in order to keep completely out of the right-of-way,which would be disappointing to the design of the building. Currently the building is residential in character and will fit well into the neighborhood,as opposed to a flat roof form of design. Regarding the park and the trees located there,Mr. Smutny said that it did not make sense to bring in an arborist at this time because they do not have enough information for the arborist to decide which trees need to be removed. During the next phase of the project,the structural engineer will be able to provide better information on what will be required for the excavation of the footings. When the arborist has that information,he will be able to more reasonably determine which trees are in danger. Trees will be removed only to the minimum extent necessary. Currently the park provides access from the central downtown area to the river walk. It is simply a pass through area without a focal point. The development of the paved area with a planter and a circular seating wall will provide a focal point and a gathering space for the park. The park will be more consistent with its location within the city and with the urban development of the river walk that it connects to. The tandem parking stalls in the project will be for the 2-bedroom units. All of the 1-bedroom units and studios will have a single parking stall. This tandem arrangement is often found in narrow townhouses where there is only enough room for a tandem parking garage. The parking aisles in the parking garage will be 24 feet wide, which will be wide enough to provide maneuvering space to get in and out of tandem stalls easily. Paul Krakow,applicant,PDSK Properties,Inc.,621 Pacific Avenue#300,Tacoma,WA 98402 discussed the contamination issue. They have had the property tied up for about 16 months,and have spent the first 8 months working with Chevron Oil Company. PDSK has an agreement with Chevron that once they reach the contamination, Chevron will extract the oily soil and take it to an appropriate land fill. They have done numerous borings to determine the location of the contamination. The contamination has not migrated off site, and it is PDSK's intention to remove it before it does. Regarding the four encroachments from the hip roof,it is PDSK's feeling that the building will be a softer design,more residential in flavor with these overhangs. The City is very supportive of it. PDSK feels that a reasonable tradeoff for the encroachments on the west side of the property would be the 15-foot easement for pedestrian access to the park. They are hopeful that the four encroachments,as they are now designed,will be approved,otherwise it may be necessary to negotiate some other type of easement on the north end of the property and to look at a flat roof design for the building. From a practical standpoint,a flat roof does not perform as well as a hip roof. A flat roof can allow moisture in the buildings. It is PDSK's intent to keep the building,not to build and sell, so the performance and the esthetics of the building is very important. Kirk King,DDS, 66 Williams Avenue S.,Renton,WA 98055 stated that he considered the redevelopment of the Downtown Core in making the decision to locate his business in the area. He feels that this project would create a dynamic environment for businesses in the area by bring in more potential customers. He stated that he feels a project of this caliber fits the neighborhood and expressed his strong support of it. Richard Stauff, 13813 139t Avenue SE,Renton,WA 98059 stated that he owns property Burnett Place. He • expressed concern about access and the increase in traffic on Burnett Place with the development of this project. Burnett Place is only 15 feet wide in some places, and when motorists speed this is a dangerous situation. • 95 Burnett Project Pile No.: LUA00-171,SA-H,ECr April 12,2001 Page 5 The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 10:55 a.m. FINDINGS,CONCLUSIONS&DECISION Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant,PDSK Properties,Inc,filed a request for approval of a Site Plan for a two-building apartment complex and associated parking. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M)for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments.with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site consists of four parcels located at 73,75,77 and.95 Burnett Avenue South. 6. The subject site currently houses the Lande Feed Mill and several other small commercial structures. The subject site is across Burnett and slightly north of the McLendon's Hardware. 7. The subject site was part of the original Plat of the City of Renton, incorporated in 1901. 8. The subject site is.designated CD(Center Downtown). The subject site is located in the actual Downtown Core Area and is exempt from a number of development requirements. The subject site is exempt from required parking,setbacks,lot coverage and landscape requirements. 9. . The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of urban,downtown uses,but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 10. The applicant proposes erecting two,side-by-side four-story apartment buildings that will contain 118 dwelling units. The first floor will be a garage containing 164 stalls. A small plaza would be developed in the adjacent park to the north of the subject site if the Parks.Department.agrees. A trail connection would link the subject site to the linear trail that runs through the park. 11. The subject site is level. The existing structures and paving would be removed to enable development. In addition,two underground storage tanks, one on the subject site and one on the adjacent park but serving the Lande Feed site will be removed. 12. The applicant proposes developing the 1.3 acre parcel with the apartment complex. • 13. The proposed complex will have a density of 91 units per acre which meets the Comprehensive Plan's policies. ' . 95 Burnett Project File No.: LUA00-171,SA-H,ECF April 12,2001 Page 6 14. The two buildings will be connected along the north side of the first floor and there will be a rooftop courtyard on the "bridge" area. The project will contain approximately 56,557 square feet. Each primary building will each contain an approximately 25,942 square feet footprint. The buildings would be approximately 500 feet long(north to south)facing Burnett and approximately 109 feet deep. Buildings are permitted to be 95 feet tall in the CD zone but the proposal will be 50 feet tall at the peak of the roof. 15. The building will have a varied roofline with pitched roofs and overhang areas. The facade will modulate and have articulations as well as horizontal and vertical detailing. There will be a variety of materials including asphalt shingles, stucco and vinyl siding,and a variety of trim detail including metal,cedar and vinyl. 16. The building will also have portions of its overhanging roof that intrudes or overhangs the neighboring park and the public right-of-way along Burnett. There would be four locations where the roof overhangs the airspace of the public park that include two four-foot and two seven-foot overhangs. There would be four two-foot intrusions over the Burnett right-of-way, in this case,public sidewalk. These incursions will create a precedent for this already large building,and could encourage others to also develop buildings that take full advantage of their underlying parcel and then intrude into public spaces creating shading and shadows in public spaces. The Board of Public Works would review "Right-of-way Use Permits"for the proposed intrusions. 17. The applicant proposes developing a 15-foot pedestrian trail easement along the north boundary of the subject site for access to the park. This trail would be accessible to the general public in exchange for the air rights to overhang the public spaces. - 18. Entry to the garage will be through a centrally located auto court. This will consist of a circular driveway that branches off to the parking garage. It will be landscaped and will also provide entry to the building for pedestrians. 19. In addition,to the landscaped auto court entry,there would be a landscaped area along the north side of the building and above the lobby area at the second floor level. The applicant is required to provide a setback on its north between the Senior Housing's RM-U(Multiple family.residential)Zone and this CD Zoned parcel. Street trees are proposed along Burnett. No other setbacks are required or provided. 20. The applicant has proposed providing a more formal plaza for the rear of the building in the small public park that abuts the western side of the subject site. This would require approval of the Parks Division. 21. The parking would be divided between the two wings of the complex with 81 stalls in the north wing and 83 in the south wing. This would provide 164 stalls for 118 units. While the site is exempt from parking requirements, if parking were required, it would have needed 159 stalls. Seventy-six stalls are tandem,where jockeying of cars will be required to reach the inner vehicle. Apartment assignments will permit these shared-tandem stalls. 22. There were the two underground storage tanks noted above and it appears that portions of the subject site might have held other petroleum compounds. The site was tested for contamination. Evidence of contamination were found. The ERC imposed cleanup conditions. • 23. The project will probably adversely affect trees located in the adjacent park to allow work near the common property line and tank removal. The applicant would remain liable for any damage if it receives permission to work in or adjacent to the park property. 95 Burrrett Project File No.:LUA00-171,SA-H,ECtr April 12,2001 Page 7 24. The applicant anticipates that development would take approximately 16 months. The normal impacts of construction are expected, including heavy machinery,dust,noise and traffic. 25. The project is expected to generate approximately 418 additional trips. Staff did not indicate that this would create any untoward impacts on local traffic. 26. A sewer line will need to be relocated to accommodate the proposed development. It could run under the center of the building. Staff recommended that the applicant hold the City harmless in the event the line needs additional work. 27. The site is subject to Urban Center Overlay regulations which are reviewed under separate authority. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The site plan ordinance provides a number of specific criteria for reviewing a site plan. Those criteria are generally represented in part by the following enumeration: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; b. Conformance with the Building and Zoning Codes; c. Mitigation of impacts on surrounding properties and uses; d. Mitigation of the impacts of the proposal on the subject site itself; e. Conservation of property values; f. Provision for safe and efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation; g. Provision of adequate light and air; h. Adequacy of public services to accommodate the proposed use; The proposed use in the main,satisfies these and other particulars of the ordinance. The incursions into public spaces is one of first impression and creates precedents that would seem to have deserved more analysis by staff. 2. The proposed apartment complex is compatible with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. It provides concentrated housing in the urban core of the City. It is compatible with the City`s goals of creating an urban center well-served by housing and transit opportunities. 3. The building's bulk and height meets the requirements of the Zoning Code. The proposal provides the one required side yard setback adjacent to its north property line where a residential zone abuts it in that location. Building and Fire Code compliance is determined when a building permit is submitted. • 4. As noted,the building intrudes into public spaces at its roofline. This will have the affect, even if minimally,of blocking sunlight and the sky from public spaces. The park on the north of the site is 95 Burnett Project File No.: LUA00-171,SA-H,ECF April 12,2001 Page 8 already small and narrow and the absence of a setback will crowd it even more. The fact that the building's roof detail will overhang it will make it less open. This office would recommend that the Park Division deny use of the air space. The overhang over the street is smaller and the street is wider and can suffer the incursion better although, again, as noted above,the building is already filling out the majority of its site which creates the unnecessary precedent of intruding and shading public open spaces, including sidewalk areas. 5. It would be hoped that the residential use and the nearby McLendon's,including its outside storage and its working lumber yard will be compatible neighbors. 6. The project, other than the intrusions appears well designed. It provides modulations and interesting facade elements. 7. The redevelopment of the old and fairly rundown feed mill site should help conserve property values in the area. 8. Staff has reported that the auto court entry as well as pedestrian access seems appropriate. 9. The site itself is fairly intensively developed but the auto court,upper lobby court and two-building couplet should provide adequate light and air for the project. As well noted,the incursions into public air space will cut down the amount of light and air at the ground level in a public park and along the sidewalk. 10. The site is in the urban core and should have adequate public services. DECISION: The proposed site plan is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The"applicant is required to comply with the Mitigation Measures that were required by the Environmental Review Committee Threshold Determination. 2. The applicant shall either modify the project's roofline to remove the encroachments into the City's park property and right-of-way or obtain a Right-of-Way Use Permit from the Board of Public Works and also obtain an easement from the City to allow the air encroachments. The easement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division and the City Attorney. 3. The applicant shall submit a report by a qualified arborist evaluating the potential for construction damage to trees on the park property. The report shall make recommendations to mitigate impacts to,or replace any trees that may be damaged. The report shall be reviewed and approved by the Parks Division prior to approval of the building permit. 4. The applicant shall submit revised landscape plans incorporating recommendations from the arborist evaluation and staff recommendations for species type on the park property. The plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Parks Division prior to approval of the building permit. 5. Prior to building permit approval,the applicant shall record a new sewer easement that includes a hold harmless agreement indemnifying the City from all liability arising from maintenance to the sewer 95 Burnett Project File No.: LUA00-171,SA-H,ECF April 12,2001 Page 9' main. The easement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division and the City Attorney. • 6. Prior to building permit approval,a 15-foot trail easement shall be recorded along the pedestrian connection on the north end of the property. The easement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Parks Division and the City Attorney. Plans for the pedestrian connection shall be revised to show the connection to the trail,subject to the review and approval of the Parks Division. 7. The Parks Division will have to agree to any modifications to its park and it may seek maintenance funds from the applicant for any changes that would increase park costs. 8. This office recommends that the Parks Division deny the incursions on the west side of the building that will shade and shadow the park. ORDERED THIS 12th day of April,2001. FRED J.KAU N HEARING E MINER TRANSMI ITED THIS 12th day of April,2001 to the parties of record: Steve Taylor Kent Smutny Paul Krakow 1055 S Grady Way Thomas HarkeyArchitects PDSK Properties,Inc. Renton,WA 98055 13400 Northup Way, Suite 30 621 Pacific Avenue#300 Bellevue, WA 98005 Tacoma,WA 98402 Kirk King,DDS Richard Stauff Leslie Betlach, 66 Williams Avenue S. 13813 139th Avenue SE Director,Parks Division Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98059 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 TRANSMI 1-1"bD THIS 12th day of April,2001 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman,Plan/Bldg/PW Admin. Members,Renton Planning Commission Neil Watts,Development Services Director Larry Rude,Fire Marshal Sue Carlson,Econ.Dev.Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Larry Meckling,Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer • Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler. South County Journal Betty Nokes,Economic Development Director 95 Burnett Project File No.: LUA00-171,SA-H,ECF April 12,2001 Page 10 Pursuant to Title IV,Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m.,April 26,2001. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact,error in judgment,or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14)days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV,Chapter 8,Section 110,which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk,accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department,first floor of City Hall. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. /. 1 , i 4. 7' --7 I ‘, \ \ '. IL ( P ) '- 1.-- -4 -i---- . • -a--- --oy .:65-:.s . : _1_1_1_ • __I____ __,_ . . . . f s. , • . ,...:.:—.7 -MIX -w--,-(x .., IL_- .. ._i_ _ . ._.__ _ _ ! _ _ _ s, " kJ- -Cr - --I --7(... _ . N ,, , \ , , ,, . / -CO. =11!--. _cei_co . \ ' -k ---,__._ ---._. -,•-1- \ F ---17 .___ .L__: -i(x. . I IH ( P ) NN Airport Way P 1 R-8 1'7- -a) --1 „./ •-g- ,......___ i 1 I 101 I I 1 lthg1 • , kr • I N )X,._. ,-) , • , A -------,-7— I 1 : . 1 7 1 - -- ! CA 1 i _.. ! i_ ' r•-1 "------1 . - -i • 1 N N /;•7// "--1 ' -1 1 -I ' ' i A 1 ..RM-U '-,,, N K.I --alTobin( 1 - E . iRrE? ri---! .c.)- --dD ..- __ __ z.L._ __, 0- -MN N, ''---.. _____... ..... ............„„.• j I i ! 111 IR791i iiR-i8 -•-• % N, N MI•••••:,..1.......m•mom... ' ....„. _a .. ,,.., v: .---..: _:, . _._,___ . su ....., . - _._.1 ._...1 -,---,- -- ---.1 \. --- --6 `; :3---\ .-rf (-) _C-D•__ .-R-m--h, u N .11 —14 CD ( P ) 5V16 •- 1_, ts n* R.ti-U• 1.-' _____ \--.7. _ r--= • ••••1 _ CA .-I -Q-- =11- CD cp ------ --i--- ii-3 ,._ \ , > S 2nd St. ._._,.... ----_,,,, • --- - S 2nd St. / . . ------. ---,.____ --- 1 ri 7 -- _1 • _____. .----1-___.: _ • • • •.:___ ---- --:-__- 4-:-f. --_-: - • • ••ci-) --- • • A • . '''• -- - ;:j CDcil -- . CD - .CD -__-___ _o-------4/ C --------- -1 liar. • -•,. .-- I /--- ------ -- - - IS 3rld StiT clit-% 1 P* 1 ' 1 -Rtt, '---- ; : : . -.:- , : : 1 . _ _ . Gte I Liir_._iin I Of' I 1.c-PI 121 I cA 1 1 L.. --icP 77-7- Pl. cW • :.: -0- 7'147 =7.-Z- —7-7---- CD CD(P) .01. 1 • -i- - •-__:_: .7.0-:. • ,_-;--) -- e • ! __ ---rA cp__ \ • r .--,- ----• ---- - -__. 7- ri ---- - • -.'CL) 10-• • 17--TZ. .. -;:----.- •• e 155 -1---• ›- --1-- - ......- - - CD( \R•. ; .- _ - P 1) --x- re-- - • _.-- -\ (•___,R..--_ ,.....r.....-------1 - • - CO• • CN 111 rii Jl- .....11• ' !vs T.- " • 1 4T AVENUE SOUTH \• • a --- I • .rtrvt I — — — 0 • I �Yn Y.en.�.L4o.aw.tw. UTH N I BUILDINGENTRANCM — — pry g. r.. �. xr kv. - :.•�u F'.GC✓(YLO vuwe...n '��/ �� ',-..ae,+"I, Ii"frf`tC'.•4 e4,9,/, fa'" �}/••` ea`l //�rwmi� +.'C'�f fi s.,>�. .Aid".. '' .i ,py, 4 !_77,.60.''':: IID'.erc�ow•..apw �� ', _a,.?. �a4•/ i -.� �; �. �ISW / ,"*itz"$fI,&,r r ,yy 7 rc,„., . •, '..„ f fir,.? 76 \ \. +,a i IIPt,� aCI O r{1tl takoP' � 0l�.�� , � PROPOSE.p 0, ' . . �� � / I.rx lo lifie+IV T� /•? ,w,. r .�_d ��.� �f., ` '�' 2f �// III i �FrrA��,°.tt; ' 'ktyx� r�`�Y, 4,1'k <�7 ilk h' III y/ /A�/A.F2�tl;4� ,A0g� If,;,-,...-_! n i .._ .. /.x '". o.� •• ♦7,M,�, ,aH ',...'.::,Y F f �.e 4f q,��//•/ .r'I.:SY'e'.�.�yJf„yf / 1. .. F '. . .. ._. .�. �u //.�?�ai'.?lih:94,ff� -..t .,,e.„,,,..o,:-.•a ••,.,:r AA, A //{,...i.. -wrAr r�� � @k l'4Qr �' a>� ref �'+M k• t ' r...�....w... ,• • &Q :3"'`t q�s�//_ �. :—..�.5 I%/%��/ fPY 1' r.P•N.rr '+. "�.rr' ;u�¢G6,}"" , t•h`:r�sY. 3 :w • '• MGM. .raruY " .+ . •.. tGi;dOi� r 'r'?t ]L] Mr p� FOR PAIOC DIYELOR@M NI l ANDOGAId L7 PEDESTRIAN MAU.CONNECTION •' FROM BURNER AVENUE TO PARK °' • • • BURNETT PLACE SOUTH O O O A rn ©SITE PLAN O rta PO W. MCC! 0 RoOPet Tun CDrta WY q N • MOM Ma CD / Ober.n PO KM la oll O an.rr Is.r O NI Plan Approval y • 01 A1.1 0 LOGAN AVENUE SOUTH ,_ t000s 1 co It NfL./TIVLL. 171WQLY! y ;srL.wmi1. cc.. ` V .. MITK CenciWM UM! P•' UM': UM.w.n ACM TM Q N'� o,.oei nTK.IW.D.AL l+iTt"war —. _. w NA•� it . - :.. �.:\II. II%_�.___\II ��II': .�Ilri�.ll� ■—�-'4 I=��_ Aw�.N�+r w r �nifi� _ i;; -_ fin 11 Inl7iii1 ■■■ ■■�i 1111 iii i !`7i�1 Imo (lii!7ii1 iilui, _ ;mom _ 4 --- _ I`.�1_ 1=-1_ _.- ■■■ 1= 1_ =1= 1_ === I=1c F=1_ __ I��. __.w._LL...,A meL D,WorT — — — -- — — .1 Lim l..� Iii1 Iii1 j iii Iiil Iii1 Ilia kil �i j®®® ®®Ili - _-_ - ®® =1-1= __ ® 111 === - - r7 n 1 L.1 Jaw liii 1.■1 ...i w mO 2 ppaa' ----a❑DI • t u a■.w . Q ❑ O O 0 0 ❑ O ❑ ❑ • I ■ ■ ■ 1♦■7■■■L■1■'■ ■ ■ ■T■�J•I, 0 .-=gya...t._,.+• N C M _ t1N Ty I .;I CI F11.�` 1111 I '1I� III I:I:I``Cl,I I I I'II I"II 1,1 a..II 1.111IIIL II-1:I.:If-I:1k1 •-1=1-� -. E -- .11R:CY I.TK WAucal L. COOS WM PACE C .6 KCOCI `'—LM OP Min•Caul ALIR.TOPS~YIDOODOC oBUILDING "A" "'"»'""",�'Cli CMG 1 EAST ELEVATION in O MIA)II•.r•D• M O .- YI yy R:t A/nYLI W.tlLI. C IMP •nc AM'M.Lf MM%®. C _ Marl DOPY pm nTK CQ•ND WTI I O + -__�--- -DN if. •' ^^' t'""'.L.Mt 1 nIK OWIpaYL u, .L.1l,'� � � _ _-_ _ _ l-- ----I-- ���■ � ■r■. 11ii117 ; 111 IliII iIli . III iiir. A ■ h1111 I L7 i ! ii ■_, i __�= - . 11 11■ 1 = _ = . -g o pt! 1 11�11 Ilia l ii 11�11 Ilia =ill 11 1 _'_.IF II= 11�11 g I LIK WAIpML : a1 °' MIN, 1 hill ..1 — 1-- .... -- �� F� ........ 9i IF FM f 1 ® ■■■ 11 F O IG 1•14.L,,_y .....k O O ❑ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ O ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ d == p 0 __ ❑0 Project Team - ;1>1I I'.;�L I,.Ills l,..1/I.I`I li.L:�I.I.1I �! I, �1 FL.1�1 .1., I II I I:.11 NI ■I`:FIA.Il„ `f r��IIIII!I!IR!��I��Ilil�►f-•`��' 1I11 ‘y.l,p=�� .�,L,.D 0 �it i:O 00 poll . .�.n,,_ r-i�— W.W..•.� ' f1 L�lJ 1 4,-AC no.a ran ro OAMO)NvlL •. a MITAAI4W. KVl.ia.lr.anl oawoon etDa!!n w �/ ..rn. wn o amD.r q s o .�rtlAaDM BUILDING"A" 61toPlan 1 WEST ELEVATION Approval tT SCAM mr.r•D• A5.11 . 0 moo■ 1 t CO ;rill L.L �I N F�'I Laws*eo.u.wrt /// NM. 0 }p }} 01.1.IMTI�LLM / f0/A TRIM }110I m 2 1 V.R.ID 8 `1 WW .L TUT "�i♦♦ �/,...y A t01,11:�--- u— ... I/• • O avow I • Z ■ 11 RIM� MMN 11 1 -- W tnr�aLoow.L wr I -__-. ffAiYtia O O Mil MIN rii in 4-1 v y.TO�ttYY LILT— II..' -f- mr.• M 6 r1<.L nT :/'� CO D �LML ) W 0 • :it rAw wL LIMO Mira...a J r�TY DuuonLa BUILDING"A" • In NORHT ELEVATION o .DL4 u,T: o v, _ 1 I r i n ' —=P"—l4�T2L'.o to ._ _.--- _=+uT a �II■.. III 'III .■. r - ;, L.� 0-s .... .... . .... .... o ° Ci a IM ill 1-__ I S ® fr,-, Er.I In a rn I ' ' I : OD ❑ OOOOO ❑ OODO ■ i _: ri :t., q F v O i rarr Lsta.. ProJ.etf 0 ) —uu4a MAI Mal MN N L.a A AIO.itl DRAM. -.. ARM NORM ld o BUILDING"B" D.tOMR: 0 - SOUTH ELEVATION ellPIA N •CML lrlt'.►.D.. .. .. ... .. < ov cn N A5. ' • CITY i__L RENTON Office of the City Attorney Jesse Tanner,Mayor Lawrence J.Warren MEMORANDUM M r To: Renton City Council From: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date: May 2, 2001 Subject: :Palmer Appeal on the Historical Significance of Lande Feed I have been provided with a copy of the Palmer appeal 'concerning the historical significance of Lande Feed. For the reasons contained within this letter, it is my advice to you that this appeal . should be dismissed immediately and without a hearing. Basically, Mr. Palmer's appeal :claims that the Lande 'Feed building is of historical significance and should be preserved. Much of his argument is made concerning our comprehensive plan policies regarding historical significance. However, at the present time, those comprehensive plan policies are.aspirational and have not resulted in`any development regulations or a city historical preservation policy. If there was an appeal,:it should have been from the development regulations adopted pursuant to the comprehensive plan, for failure to adopt a historical preservation policy. However, the time for making that appeal is long past. Perhaps the greatest problem with the appeal is that it directly contradicts the record before the Hearing Examiner. Mr. Palmer did not participate before the Hearing Examiner. Instead, the staff introduced evidence that.there are only three (3) properties in Renton listed on King County's register of historical places, and Lande Feed is not one of them. Should the Council allow this appeal to go forward, under the current appeal rules, Mr. Palmer would not be able to introduce any of his testimony, nor would he be able to argue from it. Rather he would be left with the statement that is directly contradictory to his present position. ',Ultimately, there could only be one result from such an appeal and that would be for the Council to'affirm the Hearing Examiner's decision. ' _Finally, Mr::Palmer's appeal is untimely'and Mr. _Palmer's appeal raises no issues.concerning:the approval of the-site plan: H owever,:the approval of_ the site plan is what is being appealed. I have - already discussed why his appeal-is untimely as:it;relates:to the lack of a 'historic-preservation _policy. -.:His.appeal is also.couched iri terms of a.SEPA'appeal.: However,the time for the SEPA appeal raii before the Hearing Examiner's.hearing on the site.plan.:::-Therefore, to the extent the _ appeal;raises'SEPA issues, it,is untimelyand those issues cannot be considered. As a final matter, :: :.Mr.'Palmer.did not allege standing'.to:bring'this appeal.,: He has not shown:how`he will be injured : -. from.the site;plan decision:''In fact,.he challenges no'specifics.of.the site plaii`decision Hies c . f `� pp _ O O .. O 2 Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd'Street=Renton,'Washington`98057;- (425) 255-8678 5/2/01 Page 2 of injury, rather, are to the lack of a historical preservation policy, something that cannot be considered in an appeal from a site plan approval. I know this letter is somewhat unusual because it suggests that the Council dismiss an appeal before it can be heard. However, I think, under the circumstances, that there is no good reason to go forward and waste Mr. Palmer's time, as well as that of the City Council and staff. Should you desire to discuss any issue in this letter, please feel free to contact me. Lawrence J. Warren LJW:tmj • cc: Mayor Jesse Tanner Jay Covington Sue Carlson Gregg Zimmerman • Neil Watts Jennifer Henning . T10.30:25 ; CITY F RENTON NIL ifmkso, City Clerk Jesse Tanner,Mayor Marilyn J.Petersen April 30, 2001 Daniel Palmer 16638 106th Street SE Renton, WA 98055 Re: Appeal of Site Approval for 95 Burnett Project; PDSK Properties; LUA-00-171 • Dear Mr. Palmer: . This letter requests clarification of the letter you filed with this office on April 25,2001, regarding the referenced site approval request. The appeal was addressed to and forwarded to the hearing examiner,who has determined that your intention is to file an appeal with the City Council'on this matter. • If your intention is to appeal the hearing examiner's decision on this matter to the City Council, a standard appeal form must accompany your letter(copy enclosed). Please complete the form by identifying the errors of law or fact upon which the appeal is based and return the form in the envelope provided. If I can provide additional information,please feel free to contact me. You will receive written notice of all further action and/or meetings regarding-this matter. - Sincerely, • Marilyn . sen : . City Clerk/Cable Manager cc: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner Steve Taylor, Project Manager - • 1901 2001 1055 South Grady Way -''Renton,'Washington'98055 - (425) 430-6510 /FAX (425) 430-6516 Asa T��-�,�e.���,,,����o,.��..�,�a�.�,���,��a,-_-•___-.:__. �eh�::� ���`-a' . 7 Itc,c67,51 CITTA JF RENTON .. }`�, Hearing Examiner Jesse Tanner,Mayor Fred J.Kaufman April 30, 2001 Daniel Palmer 16638 106t''Avenue SE Renton, WA 98055 Re: Appeal of 95 Burnett Project LUA00-171,SA-H,ECF Dear Mr. Palmer: This office has reviewed your letter of April 25, 2001 regarding the Lande Feed Store. • Apparently,you filed this matter as an appeal of a decision regarding the redevelopment of the subject site and paid the appeal fee. This office is not directly dealing with the Lande Feed Store but rather the proposed Site Plan for the development of the underlying property and adjacent property for an apartment complex. Environmental decisions were already made that would have been appealable but an environmental appeal is now untimely. Since your appeal is not directed at any flaw in the decision to approve a Site Plan,this office sees no reason to change or modify the decision. Since an appeal fee was paid and the letter calls it an appeal,the matter will be forwarded to the City Clerk. If appropriate as an appeal of the Hearing Examiner's decision,the City Council will hold a session on this matter. This office is generally not involved in demolition permit matters, and it may be possible that a• separate appealable decision on demolition of the existing Lande Feed Store is possible. You will have to direct proper inquiries to the Development Services Division of the City. If this office can provide further assistance, please feel free to write. Sincerely, Fred J.Kau roan Hearing Examiner FJK:jt cc: Mayor Jesse Tanner Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Larry Warren, City Attorney Neil Watts, Development Services Steve Taylor,Development Services Parties of Record : etof Y9012oOl 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425) 430-6515 This paper contains 50%recycled material.20%oost cnncumer 16'41):/'P.YI l ' � � , 1 i . . , 's 4 ' ' ,(,.\ \,, ! c,' . :, , . , . ,\, )- c:, * o„ i --. ! • :b ' y i\N ! 0 0 ) o P4 : - X h ,,N. kr,N, Ise (.) '( /) \ u.1 \ ,• . , vm , - - ' , b , , ,1 , N . , I , q‘, i 1)1 \ 1 1\. , . . , r,\k \tii\\ . - ! , s (/) e); .k 1 '11\ ' ) il , . k.(,: ,,Nk• i, 1 1, .,6 , , N ! , )(0) (7)) .) 1 , i; N\' Z -, - , . ,\ [ N, ! \ ' ! ) r) () .., ' ! 1 . ' ; !,-1 1 : , I ! \ \II . ; ; 1 \ • 13 ; - 1 6 , Iv, I , . - (1 (,,, 4 ‘. i , . Q ' ' i i\ s\c.' , ' rN N . ; 1 if\, . ) ', ' : r . N. ; H , Q. 1\ ' ' , ; ; , 0 \ 0 -,.. \i' ) ;• t ' , \ ' P- " -' ' k . 1 , y ) s) NI N •1 r.\ !). 1 ' iNf, •) 7sk ,N, , ;: !„, " ! , p \ , , , • i II . ,,,ci ! . 0 ! !(.\ ' l'CP„ 1 )N, , i, : ' ; . , , ) .. N. „u „ , V ; ; 1 . , „ \ P ' ' i ' 7\k: ; - , \ : • ' . '0 'r) . z`),. , 1 ,,'' . ,',36r\. . ()°`„\.., ki.orl, Q‘11 : ' 0 R Q k!, 1 '\% 0 \ ,, . I fill 6 . , , ., i , , . , , . " , ‘ i I \ \ b. � � ,v, , I.; o ) i, \ i ik.. . . .1 '� (�\ i\,!• , 'r‘ b , , t,, : ' '-: ,i , ,' \ '-;6' If&H\ 1QH.NI,N. .. \&, ,, oN , , c ‹,,,_' —,) ilo,ki. c 1 . , . - pi n , I) \ (,) . ; u ,„ 1 , ' t, .. ,„ (-0 \ R,1 1 .. Q' k p • \ -p tf) , '(-\: N . N, ., , \ . , i _ 1 ie.) NL)N. . . . 1 . 6044\ 1 Q \') : • '1\i\sZ '' j)i. as4) . 1 (),) . r) •\,. 4) i q) is, \, � I g � J � i 'fi u ' c . ek N., N \\f‘. 'N. :I 1 1 I 1 Ur7O) • • fli '` '. \1 . V'' '' ' 0 . . C Q 'k'Il 1 r(R) r) rb ' 6. . ' .\:rf - \%t ()\1 ‘ • l' i") 4 r!, q \f) ) ' il - ', • /)' f` .14 A' 1 - ' - '15'' (9:% P '1) . 9i6 1 . (4. 3P• Lt'k/f)) rls\ \'i43C-: ' 0\.).c . ( P , 140) Plk -c) .1 (. ., -(; :9 ' .... , .i. 0 ' \: , )1 ,, , , - r6 — : • () - Col \\r‘ : )'1- ?.)CC.Sq . k-- ' ° ') • ' ' \ r) ' P : (11) - 3 ""O Z :p_ . , 1 - e ih • o- .\\ • ILI-Nk ), , \ rA ,(76 1,i) ()) 1 \ I ./ JL/fh o� CP /'. r� � � � � /' DC� UPS /00-2 rie-?y / c.J //c. /"74a/9c-// t EIL- /92 6 /< /V(' 7L, ce z so//, ri,/e) C c%_/ r 65.‘'("i -5/cDs 74 4/0 'Cec c A/re'CLre er s' -( 0 • et")a/ E(X c /A= ' /lq0LIch C 20o / ' ' C� i `n Kyt Q ( cI) 3 ® C� ( 4'cv- COM rol/ 04ic o P - y 7- P/96R / / Q -22 ( t /O * sQ c92 $ ) 8 7 /Ito 4/ _ro ,__7_2_,2/294/___ __ c ro•4/1,7 ___ __ z-- 327779- i-7---- /1_,9 _ ai‘'. 7 el r - _ - --- ---- ------- -- - --- _ _____ ___ ,;_s- _A7/kp„,=. 7,-7-. , s _cc 6i/a /). ./7_ (1c_iktict /, ) _ _ __:_z___,_) .:%..d.4)- . c._cv-vo / _d.i i_/ c AI_ (_/cp (A) el.?? 3 00,Q c ci a c . .4e. / a 77_ _ -__71:),_4_-_______ _st,,-/-u-0$0/y--- r_vatv - Ccr) /rs'axn. ((z) q 2 C c. 7 0 iq ar , 76 /1 . /____o 0 3 6- , 70 4- • -. /_0 Ar CC; c.)_•-17 \— ',-pi-Nr-t j / m c---210- i 0 4-4 5 O (I 0 9 er- 4 -47 _ 4 --1- _____4i -- i C) e_ ‘_.0 ---- Z U ' ___Z___ci - '3'? ? 7. LA) -- - 3_ _Y_._% Lu ' y O 464_ _ ____ ?___LI ( __to \_ • ( 1 • . , . . . NOTES RECE I PT DATE Ei/VO/40! NO- 5231 n 1 f, RECEIVED FROM Nr;; R 1 rn 1 im P IT ..-- - n ,t: • - •-•--• ADDRESS 1/s5.(r i ? 101,1-0A SC! • I , 044 4irvt Oiq 6 6 $ FOR 11 pr,p0.1 of- Igo if:1112+4-CI- pf-,,y,eci.- CI e,144,P Fee,i r 0...*\ r ' - i .4_44 -.00-1-mi / i ACCOUNT HOW PAID AMT.OF ACCOUNT ' CASH -IC , ApANITE; CHECK • .BALANCE -HONEY By fiA Mux Wt it n v • DUE ' ° ORDER. ;D1998 MPIFORMO 8L802 . . ) ,.__ ''_-;'.,77;"7.:;?;'.-;'':':::;; ;-:::;;;:',:-..,:::;,',.l,Z;;..,';';',.,:'"';',....,-;;;,.:''4 :_.,,:....„, .::'-',:•. ;''- . .,. ;;,'' '';';;'. ,..;'',. ';i'' .`. '''; ;:;',..;';', , ., .;-. '' ;-' ; . 1 April 9,2001 Renton City Council Minutes Page 113 AUDIENCE COMMENT Jessica Lehnenz, 1921 Talbot Rd. S.,Renton, 98055, expressed her opposition Citizen Comment: Lehnenz- to the demolition of the Lande Feed Company store located at 95 Burnett Ave. Lande Feed Company Store S. Commenting,that she is a frequent customer of the store,Ms.Lehnenz Demolition stressed the importance of retaining historic structures in Renton. EXECUTIVE SESSION MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL RECESS INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR 24 MINUTES TO DISCUSS A PERSONNEL ISSUE. CARRIED. Time: 8:46 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 9:10 p.m.;roll was called; all Councilmembers present. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 9:10 p.m. MARILYNJ. TERSEN,CMC,City Clerk Recorder: Michele Neumann April 9,2001 April 9,2001 - Renton City Council Minutes Page 112 The Committee further recommended that the resolution regarding this matter be presented for reading and adoption. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See later this page for resolution.) Development Services: A- Noting that the Council had requested a status report one year after adoption of Frame Sign Ordinance the A-Frame Sign Ordinance on March 6,2000, it was MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN,COUNCIL REFER THE A-FRAME SIGN ORDINANCE TO THE PLANNING& DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption: RESOLUTIONS Resolution#3498 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into a ° Franchise: King County, franchise agreement with King County allowing the Renton Wastewater Utility Construct&Maintain Sanitary to operate,maintain,repair,and construct sanitary sewer mains and service Sewer Mains on County Roads lines and appurtenances in,over,along,and under county roads and rights-of- ways. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY CLAWSON,COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution#3499 A corrected resolution was read setting a hearing date on May 7,2001,to Vacation: SE 2nd P1 between vacate a portion of SE 2nd P1.between Lyons Ave. SE and Nile Ave. SE and Lyons Ave SE&Nile Ave SE that portion of Nile Ave. SE 312.94 feet north of SE 2nd P1. (Parkside Court &Portion of Nile,VAC-01.- Plat/Harbour Homes; VAC-01-001). MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED 001 BY NELSON,COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. The following ordinance was presented for first reading and referred to the Council meeting of 4/16/2001 for second and final reading: Finance: 2001 Budget An ordinance was read appropriating monies from various fund balances, Amendments increasing the expenditures in various funds and departments,and increasing the 2001 Budget by$14,110.000. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY CLAWSON,COUNCIL REFER THE ORDNANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 4/16/2001. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Council President Clawson reported that he,Councilman Parker,and Legislature: Senate Bill 4160, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Gregg Zimmerman had Transportation Improvements addressed the Senate Transportation Committee in Olympia in support of Local Option Funding Senate Bill 4160. He explained that the bill would provide the Puget Sound region with local option funding for transportation improvements. Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler added that the Suburban Cities Association is meeting this week,to discuss the various transportation proposals that are pending in Olympia. Community Event: Centennial Councilwoman Nelson reported that the City's Centennial Celebration float Celebration Float will appear in the Daffodil Parade in Tacoma on April 21 st. King County: Emergency MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY CLAWSON,COUNCIL REFER Medical Services(EMS)Levy THE SUBJECT OF THE KING COUNTY EMS LEVY PROPOSAL TO THE Proposal PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Appeal: Monopole at N 30th Larry Warren reported receiving notification that AT&T Wireless will St,Kennydale Neighborhood withdraw its application and subsequent appeal to erect a monopole at 1321 N. Association&AT&T Wireless 30th St. LUA - 00-11 1► 5� • RECEIVED April 20, 2001 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES APR 2 5 2001 CITY OF RENTON Mayor Jesse Tanner APR 27 2001 RECEIVED MAYORS OFFICE City of Renton RECEIVED CITY 2 6 2001 CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN RE: Lande Feed Store Recently I was made aware of the intent of the city to demolish one of our historic landmarks to make way for more apartments in accordance with the city expansion orn1e't. It saddens and disturbs me to witness this chipping away of our heritage in the name of progress. It has been my experience and opinion that progress is not always progress! Exactly how many more new apartment does down town Renton require, especially in the light of Boeing's recent announcement of their intent to leave our fair city. I grew up in Renton and have lived in the area for my entire life. My family raised baby chicks and rabbits and later we had a mini farm with a variety of animals. It was a more wholesome era. Thus, our local feed store of yesteryear holds a bit of nostalgia for me and I for one do not want to see it demolished. I am also persuaded that there are countless others like me, who would like to see Lande Feed preserved as a historical and educational landmark, allowing it's continuation of service to our community. Thank you for your consideration. It is my hope that the city will develop a way to blend our past with our future. Sincerely, Sharon R. Thompson cc: Renton City Council Renton Historical Society Tay (' . Nt (y ✓t P Sue_ C. e 'e u>. DP 6_1(P z . • DEVELOPMENT SER\ S RE�E��• - CITY OF RENTOI RECEIVED ED RECEIVED APR 2 7 2001 APR 2 6 2001 April 18, 2001 RECEIVED CITY OFRENTON APR 2 5 2001 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN City of Renton MAYORSOFFfCE Mayor, Jesse Tanner There's a lot of exciting new changes taking place in downtown Renton these days. New apartments and condominiums strategically located for easy access to the freeways and at the same time just a short walk away from our lovely trail along the Cedar River. Walking is a possibility as well, to our library, churches, restaurants and shops in old Renton. And there's a nice big Safeway as well. The city planners have done their jobs with exceeding intuition. They should each be commended. But one bit of news that has been rumored is very sad indeed. It would be a tragic thing for the old Lande Feed Store to be demolished. It should be preserved as a historical monument! Back to the old days, when farmers with their horse drawn buggies would pull in to buy a few bales of hay and chicken feed, or maybe barter for fresh eggs. The history of the old feed store goes way back to approximately the same year as Seattle's Pike Place Market began (1907). Still today you can walk into the old feed store on Burnett Avenue, step onto the old worn plank floor and smell the aroma of hay and chicken feed. You can pet a rabbit, hear a rooster crow and of course my favorite thing since early childhood, watch the baby chicks. You can take your grandchild too for a glimpse of the real world. Wouldn't it be exciting if our city planners would help preserve this historic building? It could be an added enhancement for our community, tying us to our colorful past. Sincerely, (`: -44e- LLB. Doris Mech Senior Farmer, Pike Place Market Former Renton High Teacher cc: Renton City Council -Thr . s ./ Renton Historical Society Renton Reporter � G� � Z,L,� South County Journel / ,�7` Seattle PI c� C. Le-e. W 6 r-e 99 z. PREVCO i_t_n 7' 253 627 4049 03/22/01 15:06 i :01/02 NO:16( f° $ vrKitr! , !Pity, 00 - ; 7/ FAX COVER SHEET: DATE: Aiiliic l i 2-3 Time: FAX TO: SSGtie TA--�, �U tr' -------_.- COMPANY: / FAX NO.: `[ ZS — 3 C� — 730 0 , 1-2 FAX FROM: I 1 1 (r/44 U't--‘) _0 -�i- RE: 9-,F.._ Afver 4177 .t TRANSMITTAL IS OF Z_ PAGES, COVER SHEET INCLUDED. MESSAGE, 1F ANY: 5�7e✓-@ A-tMe 4 i !�' lrn e 1'o de, sy --__ rJ —1 I PiktP Cie (1 i E e Ri i G./4 cam- c /e, ,-H_A ) ►,¢-� d?z- If transmittal is incomplete or unreadable,please contact us. Nore The documents accompanying this facsimile transmission may contain information which is confidential and/or legally pnvilc ed. The information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named on this transmission sheet. If you are not the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that any use of this information is strictly prohibited and that the documents should be returned to this firm immediately. If you have received this fax in error, please notify us by telephone immediately so that we can arrange for the return of the documents at no cost to you. Thank you. Ono Pacific Building 621 Pacific Ave., 0300 Tacoma, WA 88402-4611 Office: (253) 627-4070 Fax: (253 627-4049 ' PREVCO LLC `•: 253 627 4049 03/22/01 15:06 Di :ue/u2 N0:16( I'IHm. —_p .UU.I. 1k7 __'r' HM L.WL - • 4'%'_°,1.a 17t� P . Y7.= . r • II Wlllard'a Peat Control Company 4 -41 I ef;I entlili fl Cotiiittl�lt'l iidl * 111E1(/."( :la `` r'' 13811 N.E. 128th Places#200 . -ti‘NI ?' ' . Kirkland,WA 98034 vs 0 ri 426-820-1980 a Fax: 428-823-8170 • E-mall; wlllarda.pc©verizon.net March 23,2001 Paul Krako;President PDSK Properties,Inc. 621 Pacific Ave. 4300 Tacoma,WA.98402-4611 Dear Paul, Following is my proposal to exterminate rodents at the Londe Feed Mill and associated building locations. As we discussed you are not concerned at this point with pigeons or feral cats that also inhabit.Londe Feed. It is my understanding that after the mill is vacant we will have as much time as needed to exterminate the existing rodent population. It is very difficult to approximate population numbers,but there is evidence of a healthy rodent population. The species in question is probably Norway rats. My plan is to"flood" the vacant buildings with several types of devices. These will include snap traps and rodent bait stations. I will use single feed modern bait in the stations. This product insures the rodent receives a lethal dose with only one feeding. All bait stations will be secured to prevent non-target pests from accessing the bait,Bait stations wilt also be placed around the exterior perimeter of the buildings.They will be locked and secured. By placing between ion-coo snap traps inside the buildings I hope to trap as many rats possible in the shortest period of time. All traps and bait stations will be serviced every other day. My goal is to complete this process in two weeks. I think timing is critical. I do not want rodents moving from the Londe site to neighboring buildings. I believe after the buildings are vacant much of the food supply and harborage will also be removed.That is why 1 want to place as many baiting stations and snap traps as I possibly. I want to maintain an intensive trapping and bailing campaign while the rodents are disturbed by the activity of Londe Feed vacating. Cost of this service is 51950,00 plus tax for the initial baiting/trapping.Every other day service Is S 150.00 plus tax. T estimate five services after the Initial. If more services are needed we can accommodate those at the$150.00 rate. Sincerely, Ik- Rick A.Mix • S. King Co. Bellevue N. Seattle S. Seattle North Bend Cle!lum Ellensburg 206-824-12,57 425-451-728R 206-368-8184 20S-246-1992 423-831-6773 509-674-5042 509.962-2044 CITY'OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY.MAILING On the -1442 day of "4t1iZI" , 2000, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Urban CuAtur DCS19h Oliti/tfai documents. This information was sent to: rzlatith s Name Representing PDSK P� �-� � (oc sw‘ufi1A.Ai -Tlho vv%a.S +la r k�-1 4 iTh arts ' t� l eve vL sTa v-ko v t ck f\avtrin rfil.c.-e_ slevvIlac) (Signature of Sender) idvtc, 1 - STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that yn A/14 . *- ��e� pk) signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the s and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated:T"Y)vi, a 4 ) aco Notary Public in an for the S ate of Washingto Notary (Print) MARILYN KAMCHCrr My appointment I i oulosta ExpiR :....m3 Project Name: (15 oilvin Project Number: NOTARY2.DOC • CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On thet=G' day of 14110-14-1/) , 2000, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing P .poVt -4 I . documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing PDSK Prot-es Ivy ev,1 vv►�t TRVILLt k 8ekrevtki Sfi&Jkou ch La A v S 1 evv\ko K�v k k\ki Aatcrir, (-- ems (Signature of Sender) S& - - -- ) STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that A-Y'C-kA .. �,p� ,t signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the useid and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: --)/Y1 CLA. L. 2(/) ADD/ ���Yj �► Notary Public in an or the State of Washington / Notary (Print) My appointment e� YN IC�IMCH APl 3,NTMENTEFFEXPIRES:6-29-03 Project Name: g 5rpLk.VN Project Number: 1—U OD— 11 1 FF//�� , "-v4D P 1BL1C cu'1nSSi'N EXPIRESJGTON NOTARY2.DOC `I 4, j CITY F RENTON IA ; c, Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator April 2, 2001 Mr. Kent Smutny Thomas Harkey Architects 13400 Northup Way#30 Bellevue,WA 98005 SUBJECT: 95 Burnett Project Project No. LUA-00-171, SA-H,ECF Dear Mr. Smutny: This letter is written to confirm receipt of the March 23, 2001 proposal from Willard's Pest Control Company regarding conducting a rodent abatement program prior to the demolition of Lande Feed Mill. After reviewing the proposal and clarifying several aspects with Rick Mix of Willard's, Development Services finds the proposal adequate to mitigate for the potential rodent impacts to the neighborhood. According to Mr. Mix, the program is expected to last approximately 2 weeks. At the conclusion of the program and prior to approval of a demolition permit, you will need to provide the City with a report documenting the programs success and recommendations for further activities if needed. You may proceed with the abatement program at any time but approval of the demolition permit is subject to the Site Plan Approval and expiration of the Appeal Period. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at(425)430-7219. let.(40.17 Steve Taylor Senior Planner cc: Mr. & Mrs. Starkovich/Owners Mr. Philip Lande/Owner Parties of Record PDSK Properties, Inc. ento Rodent Abatement Ltr.dos 1901i2001 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 CI, Y1 1ti This oaoer contains 50%recycled material 90%nest rnnciimar `"<LE 1 I -: , CITY JF, RENTON 'ai C N\ City Clerk J e Tanner,Mayor Marilyn J.Petersen April 12, 2001 q- 44V- Richard W. Anarde 6 .� 717 SW 3rd Place Renton, WA 98055 Re: Preservation of Lande Feed Building Dear Mr. Anarde: This will acknowledge receipt of your letter to Mayor Tanner,members of the Renton City Council, and the Hearing Examiner regarding preservation of Lande Feed. Copies have been forwarded to the aforementioned officials as requested. If I can provide additional information,please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, ;,0 Marilyni. ' ersen City Clerk/ able Manager cc: Mayor Jesse Tanner Members, Renton City Council Hearing Examiner entO 1901 2001 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425) 430-6510 / FAX (425)430-6516 °' aiThis toner contains 50%recvcled material.30%nnct rnncumar eh tnY11116 - CITY OF RENTON APR 1 1 2001 _. dear (/l ss f/ifrs,) laei 'i-s ell, 7 7 e , i 6e REC I �L �T'� E S OP�L� /CL C/7y Caan C/X P/ease see le /`t f4a14 each, - 7ansl er. meted t 6ft� e . C.fy Coto,ci/ /1layor l ah17 et �L�i`Pc .awl �tr7L/e ne/i/ _..417 d a/5 o f'1�e Reatih ExQwi,er _-rece pe 4 or .� !�T . oie co 'etin CO,,y � ��/ � y r c �� (p a e) / lie,- as Soo S 7` e eir�i` i G p y � ny �ec st 4 /*,air -,o�,5-/Pe • - 6 e /� , adle Cofc'e`' illy 74A e �a ele fe el Co, IL q r-ahk,yva 7' 'r yoar 7) and 96" Sam/7 e/ 7 .S, ,h /reinfon, in �erlacal ail-ee eh 14/7/2 les/ec71-6//y X/ T7 Coa,1z` i'r 4's 7Lo`/4a7 r e 5-erva vM71 /4 /Q��eh ane/ 7. . . t 6 e7'i, /14, 7I!_e_ `-e7t"n7 si'oS6- /274 a f aril 6/ /-eS7L01-a7Lt 14 of. MY OF RENTON C%G • L721-4."-c./ - /� IA -e Zan ate, e eat Co4- APR 1 1 2001 C • "7 c, e 7`` e /%fYry7/ / ,Paso/7( 7 r !ny j-f9 G1 ses7` and ofinio42 RECEIVED G CITY CLERKS OFFICE L • 74/75 teriea refetrot / 'set-r/?e 46o/h ..4 e la//420 ota7Les . , • ._ far em 7h y iree-7`-<fii e ages ?• /5- Jo e( 4-A.ern_ f . eel/n/9,4.11 .5-ecri?e eek-al-rie ell if reh/afry. pea./ . a-17 4,7/*.z (6.1 nica r-e /Iv ep/C,0 are- /4Le / ar6an ) 74A cd- r/71 deo _ e 6.74' Xeiga/Is raes/- ter Gt/4/6/ cpc jnI d/fee' c ?tin tee)us././ yeteth;.7 64e_57,1. es s y ierh Zen, /;:if vet itia /e I, e- c/1/7 ens.• e 710 7,4 e CaioeIva /1 / 4 pri-/e7al 11 / ;C, . 7 ^ ,ifc a .sy n et/7 easill 1/4/4 on t.c1L .e11aer ....s--ecfriee i:5 Pa 9/(1. ee on feel -efi ea/4 to cohsatafr a ifrfee-e 10. _ ' LjC451O/fr ee :la óe. . 7(;)-i?` . . _ _ 14./i4._ e to/P/7y 9, ..•2 , o 1,-/pia 11 -51-/-/- e tes°to-7c e`Z en74ep a/2 • irevea "7..e.7Cep.pa r/c e r 7o's e WAG!' erre n7er 7/164 <17 a.id - fn }-er_e12 7 le°r ?/M /-5- e7-L5 _ _ •a n r a a( 4-0 //a' iima6(1-74-h t e res/ e.? _411 144 s• -; 7A eQ/1-• A a 6/1-4, . owe/./ e c4s r7.7 7`.9_ t..0 0 eit-147/ . -- ?L.-A e e6, /), e a „ id 7 .Aare 4' fie hvorAs " es, t4 e �a,iole "-eel krAal` ,`s /e 7 7 o f 0y • .... Co., 571-oy- e reeo,/s ra/171 -e a ...Aer"ta -e . 6�! _0.1�.�'1'or . d et Z irou ld ask ._ you 7`0 . cogs/Wel- /S e .cllo1Y•hj, - . f%ot�r yo i for a7z" ctdear as a jeer/ tr,// Year 7Z,, e aoi efforts 2 Ire. i1 ? is dal . eete iiiai year,. e,iYeti%lj /%174o 14Aa7 ._ ,e ec f{u/ly, 4171€//loca/ eemel/7' 14,-'7 _ . ._ _ ... .. yf c oaM 7L far ,4Lc 1`o/-ic a . . . . !oh ("17 .. _ e/1.11o/7) .. V7 -5; fi'� 3,-i rt 1/2 ...oar 4 c//2 �.S,S'.. . di5 7 -'c 71; .. .leiids- .e`fnO,e° 1..1`i . Sfa�7` lyih tie . Lah e... .Co , eye_ you lsare-- a -c- as,re _ . .__ .sare_poss,/y_iQen.toys oldP..s s t<,//. s714Pftif Iasi`,ass St/ is f-. . 01-er arec qr!o/?eer 6ac, e� c, Act ycar s-e%es 1,s,' Hai /n Q!, . . . . feveMue frroa/uc.i, sfracr'ares . AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss. County of King ) /V being first duly sworn,upon oath, deposes and states: That on theJ - y of 4/7721 / , affiant deposited in the mail of the United States a sealed envelope(s) containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Signature: --=1U�-. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this I2 day of a , 2001. AsIoN ' v i Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, V \,;-_- 2 = Residing at S�,�-/f�f , therein. ' �'1,, OF WASH ; Application, Petition, or Case No.: 95 Burnett Project LUA00-155,SA-H,ECF The Decision or Recommendation contains a complete list of the Parties of Record. HEARING EXAMINER'S REPORT April 12, 2001 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: PDSK Properties,Inc. 621 Pacific Avenue#300 Tacoma,WA 98402 File No.: LUA00-4-53,SA-H,ECF '1 LOCATION: 73, 75, 77 and 95 Burnett Avenue South SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The proposed project includes the demolition of Lande Feed Mill and several small commercial buildings to construct a four-story apartment structure containing 118 dwelling units. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on March 6,2001. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area;the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the March 13,2001 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday,March 13,2001, at 9:21 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Site Plan application,proof of posting,proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: East Elevations Exhibit No.4: West Elevations Exhibit No. 5: Auto Court Elevations Exhibit No.6: Water and Sanitary Sewer Plan Exhibit No. 7: Landscape Plan Exhibit No.8: Neighborhood Map Exhibit No. 9: Zoning Map Exhibit No. 10: Business Map Exhibit No. 11: Materials Board Exhibit No. 12: Historical Report for State of Washington Exhibit No. 13: Urban Center Design Overlay Exhibit No. 14: Notice of Infraction and 11 photos Regulations Report 95 Burnett Project File No.: LUA00-171,SA-H,ECF April 12,2001 Page 2 The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Steve Taylor, Senior Planner,Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98055. This project is a 4-story, 118-unit apartment complex to be located on a 1.3-acre site on the west side of Burnett Avenue South. The project will be constructed as two buildings,3-stories of residential over a parking garage. The two halves of the building are connected at a central lobby with a second story courtyard above. The building is approximately 50 feet in height at the peak of the roof. The density for the project is approximately 91 dwelling units/acre. The first floor of the building will contain structured parking with 164 stalls. The property is bordered on the west by a City park. The park currently consists of lawn and trees with a pedestrian trail. The roofline of the building intrudes slightly into the air space of the park on the west side of the building and the right-of-way on the east. Additionally,the project will remove two underground storage tanks associated with the Lande Feed Mill. Environmental studies indicated the presence of contaminated soils that will be removed prior to development. The project also includes the replacement of a sewer connection from Burnett Place S.to Burnett Avenue S. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC) issued a Determination of Non-Significance—Mitigated for the project on February 12,2001. No appeals of the threshold determination were filed. Mitigation measures included compliance with the geotechnical consultant's recommendations, removal of the underground storage tanks under DOE regulations, abatement of any soil and water contamination identified in the environmental studies,payment of appropriate Fire,Traffic and Parks Department mitigation fees, and the implementation of a rodent abatement program. In response to a question from the Examiner,Mr. Taylor stated the contamination on the north end of the site resulted from the area having been occupied by a diesel and fuel oil distribution center up until the early 1960s. Mr. Taylor continued by reviewing the project's consistency with site plan approval criteria. The project conforms to the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies in providing mix of uses, and supporting downtown development in striving for urban density and intensity of uses. The proposed use will provide a more intensive use of an underdeveloped site and create housing opportunities. The project also provides for the multi-family mix in residential units and is located in the Downtown Core. The project incorporates pedestrian connections and open space features into its design,as well as provides structured parking for the units. Mr. Taylor stated that there have been reports of Lande Feed being a historical building. In the Historic and Archeological Resources Section of the Land Use portion of the Comprehensive Plan it states that historic and archeological resources within the City should be protected. There is no City documentation or maps that designate this property as an historical site. The property is listed on the King County Inventory,but not on their Historical Register. It is also not listed on the State of Washington's Historical Register. Continuing with his review of consistency with site plan approval criteria, Mr. Taylor discussed the project's conformance with Land Use Regulations. The site is located in the Downtown Core Area,which makes it exempt from many of the landscape, parking, setback, and lot coverage requirements. The footprint of the building will cover most of the site. The applicant has made application to the Board of Public Works for a Right-of-Way Use Permit for the air encroachment into the public right-of-way. No setbacks or landscape requirements are applied to the CD zoned properties in the Downtown Core Area, unless the property abuts residentially zoned parcels. In this instance,the property abuts residentially zoned property on the north side of the building. The applicant is proposing a 16-foot landscaped setback containing a pedestrian connection on this side of the building. The proposal includes several landscaped courtyards, as well as the development of an urban plaza within the park. Due to the close proximity of several of the park trees to the property line,there is the potential that their root system may be damaged during construction. Staff recommends that this potential be evaluated by a certified arborist and that a report be submitted prior to approval of the building permit documenting their recommendations. 95 Burnett Project File No.: LUA00-171,SA-H,ECF April 12,2001 Page 3 Mr. Taylor stated that there is presently a sewer line that crosses the building site from Burnett Place S.to Burnett Avenue S. where it taps into the Metro line. This sewer line will be relocated to the central portion of the building. City staff determined that the new sewer line should be placed within a sleeve so that it is protected from downward pressure. The pipe could be accessed for maintenance either from the courtyard or from the park side. Generally structures are not allowed to be built over sewer easements,but in this case staff is felt this would be the best alternative. The cost will be completely borne by the applicant. This project is subject to the Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations. A staff report was issued on March 6, 2001 describing the criteria and the project's compliance with it. The Development Services Administrator has determined that the project is in compliance. Construction activities would result in some noise, dust and traffic impacts on surrounding properties. These impacts would be limited to the construction phase of the project,which is estimated to have a total duration of approximately 16 months(April 2001 to August 2002). The applicant has submitted a Construction Mitigation Plan outlining mitigation measures to be employed for minimizing dust, noise and traffic impacts during construction. Potential short-term noise and traffic impacts from the initial construction would be mitigated by the proposed work hours of from 7:00 a.m.to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. The Environmental Review Committee did detailed evaluations concerning the types of impacts to the site itself in terms of the contamination and the tanks on the site. They were very thorough in putting conditions of approval that meet the state standards on this project,which will result in the clean up of a contaminated site. The proposed multi-family development is expected to increase property values in the vicinity of the site. Adding residential population to downtown will improve the customer base for commercial businesses, and this is also expected to increase property values. The applicant was asked to do a traffic impact analysis, which estimated that 418 additional average daily trips would be generated by the project. A Transportation Mitigation Fee of$75 per average daily trip was imposed,which is estimated to total $31,350. Both the Fire and Police Departments have indicated existing facilities are adequate to accommodate the project, subject to the applicant's payment of the necessary impact fees. The Renton School District has indicated they have adequate facilities to serve the children generated by this project. Children would attend Lakeridge Elementary,Dimmitt Jr. High and Renton High School. The proposal would redevelop and improve a site that contains deteriorating buildings, one of which was partially destroyed by a fire in recent years. The investment in this area and the added presence of a residential population would serve to prevent neighborhood deterioration and blight Staff recommends approval of this project subject to the six conditions contained in the staff report. Kent Smutny, Thomas Harkey Architects, 13400 Northup Way, Suite 30,Bellevue,WA 98005 used the elevation drawings to explain the design of the building. He described the various types of materials using the materials board, and explained where they would be used in the building. Decorative screening will be used in the openings of the parking garage, as well as decorative landscaping along the outside garage wall. The upper three stories of the building are modulated. The portions of the building that are most forward to the street will be stucco. The areas of the building with decks that are set back father will have horizontal beveled vinyl siding in a contrasting color. The center area of the building will have vinyl shingles in another contrasting color. This will break up the building visually, so that it will appear more like two buildings on each side of the courtyard rather than only one. The building will be accented with another trim color on the railings and hip roof forms. The building roof material on the hip roofs will be composition shingle in a complimentary color. These materials and colors will be used on all sides of the building. • 95 Burnett Project File No.: LUA00-171,SA-H,ECF April 12,2001 Page 4 Mr. Smutny discussed the issue of the overhangs that extend from the roofline of the building. The overhangs are part of the modulation of the building,which has been carried into the roof structure. The hip roof form with overhangs creates shadow and helps provide a more interesting appearance for the building, although the overhangs extend into the right-of-way or the park side in a few locations. There are four locations on the park side and on both sides of the building where this encroachment takes place. If the overhangs were not allowed, some type of flat roof design would have to be used in order to keep completely out of the right-of-way,which would be disappointing to the design of the building. Currently the building is residential in character and will fit well into the neighborhood, as opposed to a flat roof form of design. Regarding the park and the trees located there,Mr. Smutny said that it did not make sense to bring in an arborist at this time because they do not have enough information for the arborist to decide which trees need to be removed. During the next phase of the project,the structural engineer will be able to provide better information on what will be required for the excavation of the footings. When the arborist has that information, he will be able to more reasonably determine which trees are in danger. Trees will be removed only to the minimum extent necessary. Currently the park provides access from the central downtown area to the river walk. It is simply a pass through area without a focal point. The development of the paved area with a planter and a circular seating wall will provide a focal point and a gathering space for the park. The park will be more consistent with its location within the city and with the urban development of the river walk that it connects to. The tandem parking stalls in the project will be for the 2-bedroom units. All of the 1-bedroom units and studios will have a single parking stall. This tandem arrangement is often found in narrow townhouses where there is only enough room for a tandem parking garage. The parking aisles in the parking garage will be 24 feet wide, which will be wide enough to provide maneuvering space to get in and out of tandem stalls easily. Paul Krakow, applicant,PDSK Properties,Inc., 621 Pacific Avenue#300, Tacoma, WA 98402 discussed the contamination issue. They have had the property tied up for about 16 months, and have spent the first 8 months working with Chevron Oil Company. PDSK has an agreement with Chevron that once they reach the contamination, Chevron will extract the oily soil and take it to an appropriate land fill. They have done numerous borings to determine the location of the contamination. The contamination has not migrated off site, and it is PDSK's intention to remove it before it does. Regarding the four encroachments from the hip roof, it is PDSK's feeling that the building will be a softer design,more residential in flavor with these overhangs. The City is very supportive of it. PDSK feels that a reasonable tradeoff for the encroachments on the west side of the property would be the 15-foot easement for pedestrian access to the park. They are hopeful that the four encroachments,as they are now designed,will be approved, otherwise it may be necessary to negotiate some other type of easement on the north end of the property and to look at a flat roof design for the building. From a practical standpoint, a flat roof does not perform as well as a hip roof. A flat roof can allow moisture in the buildings. It is PDSK's intent to keep the building, not to build and sell, so the performance and the esthetics of the building is very important. Kirk King,DDS, 66 Williams Avenue S.,Renton, WA 98055 stated that he considered the redevelopment of the Downtown Core in making the decision to locate his business in the area. He feels that this project would create a dynamic environment for businesses in the area by bring in more potential customers. He stated that he feels a project of this caliber fits the neighborhood and expressed his strong support of it. Richard Stauff, 13813 139th Avenue SE,Renton, WA 98059 stated that he owns property Burnett Place. He expressed concern about access and the increase in traffic on Burnett Place with the development of this project. Burnett Place is only 15 feet wide in some places, and when motorists speed this is a dangerous situation. 95 Burnett Project File No.: LUA00-171,SA-H,ECF April 12, 2001 Page 5 The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 10:55 a.m. FINDINGS,CONCLUSIONS &DECISION Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant,PDSK Properties,Inc, filed a request for approval of a Site Plan for a two-building apartment complex and associated parking. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance- Mitigated(DNS-M)for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site consists of four parcels located at 73, 75, 77 and 95 Burnett Avenue South. • 6. The subject site currently houses the Lande Feed Mill and several other small commercial structures. The subject site is across Burnett and slightly north of the McLendon's Hardware. 7. The subject site was part of the original Plat of the City of Renton, incorporated in 1901. 8. The subject site is designated CD(Center Downtown). The subject site is located in the actual Downtown Core Area and is exempt from a number of development requirements. The subject site is exempt from required parking, setbacks, lot coverage and landscape requirements. 9. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of urban, downtown uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 10. The applicant proposes erecting two, side-by-side four-story apartment buildings that will contain 118 dwelling units. The first floor will be a garage containing 164 stalls. A small plaza would be developed in the adjacent park to the north of the subject site if the Parks Department agrees. A trail connection would link the subject site to the linear trail that runs through the park. 11. The subject site is level. The existing structures and paving would be removed to enable development. In addition,two underground storage tanks, one on the subject site and one on the adjacent park but serving the Lande Feed site will be removed. 12. The applicant proposes developing the 1.3 acre parcel with the apartment complex. 13. The proposed complex will have a density of 91 units per acre which meets the Comprehensive Plan's policies. .'95 Burnett Project File No.: LUA00-171,SA-H,ECF April 12,2001 Page 6 14. The two buildings will be connected along the north side of the first floor and there will be a rooftop courtyard on the "bridge" area. The project will contain approximately 56,557 square feet. Each primary building will each contain an approximately 25,942 square feet footprint. The buildings would be approximately 500 feet long(north to south)facing Burnett and approximately 109 feet deep. Buildings are permitted to be 95 feet tall in the CD zone but the proposal will be 50 feet tall at the peak of the roof. 15. The building will have a varied roofline with pitched roofs and overhang areas. The facade will modulate and have articulations as well as horizontal and vertical detailing. There will be a variety of materials including asphalt shingles, stucco and vinyl siding, and a variety of trim detail including metal, cedar and vinyl. 16. The building will also have portions of its overhanging roof that intrudes or overhangs the neighboring park and the public right-of-way along Burnett. There would be four locations where the roof overhangs the airspace of the public park that include two four-foot and two seven-foot overhangs. There would be four two-foot intrusions over the Burnett right-of-way, in this case,public sidewalk. These incursions will create a precedent for this already large building, and could encourage others to also develop buildings that take full advantage of their underlying parcel and then intrude into public spaces creating shading and shadows in public spaces. The Board of Public Works would review "Right-of-way Use Permits"for the proposed intrusions. 17. The applicant proposes developing a 15-foot pedestrian trail easement along the north boundary of the subject site for access to the park. This trail would be accessible to the general public in exchange for the air rights to overhang the public spaces. 18. Entry to the garage will be through a centrally located auto court. This will consist of a circular driveway that branches off to the parking garage. It will be landscaped and will also provide entry to the building for pedestrians. 19. In addition,to the landscaped auto court entry,there would be a landscaped area along the north side of the building and above the lobby area at the second floor level. The applicant is required to provide a setback on its north between the Senior Housing's RM-U(Multiple family residential)Zone and this CD Zoned parcel. Street trees are proposed along Burnett. No other setbacks are required or provided. 20. The applicant has proposed providing a more formal plaza for the rear of the building in the small public park that abuts the western side of the subject site. This would require approval of the Parks Division. 21. The parking would be divided between the two wings of the complex with 81 stalls in the north wing and 83 in the south wing. This would provide 164 stalls for 118 units. While the site is exempt from parking requirements, if parking were required, it would have needed 159 stalls. Seventy-six stalls are tandem,where jockeying of cars will be required to reach the inner vehicle. Apartment assignments will permit these shared-tandem stalls. 22. There were the two underground storage tanks noted above and it appears that portions of the subject site might have held other petroleum compounds. The site was tested for contamination. Evidence of contamination were found. The ERC imposed cleanup conditions. 23. The project will probably adversely affect trees located in the adjacent park to allow work near the common property line and tank removal. The applicant would remain liable for any damage if it receives permission to work in or adjacent to the park property. 95 Burnett Project File No.: LUA00-171,SA-H,ECF April 12,2001 Page 7 24. The applicant anticipates that development would take approximately 16 months. The normal impacts of construction are expected, including heavy machinery, dust, noise and traffic. 25. The project is expected to generate approximately 418 additional trips. Staff did not indicate that this would create any untoward impacts on local traffic. 26. A sewer line will need to be relocated to accommodate the proposed development. It could run under the center of the building. Staff recommended that the applicant hold the City harmless in the event the line needs additional work. 27. The site is subject to Urban Center Overlay regulations which are reviewed under separate authority. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The site plan ordinance provides a number of specific criteria for reviewing a site plan. Those criteria are generally represented in part by the following enumeration: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; b. Conformance with the Building and Zoning Codes; c. Mitigation of impacts on surrounding properties and uses; d. Mitigation of the impacts of the proposal on the subject site itself; e. Conservation of property values; f. Provision for safe and efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation; g. Provision of adequate light and air; h. Adequacy of public services to accommodate the proposed use; The proposed use in the main satisfies these and other particulars of the ordinance. The incursions into public spaces is one of first impression and creates precedents that would seem to have deserved more • analysis by staff. 2. The proposed apartment complex is compatible with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. It provides concentrated housing in the urban core of the City. It is compatible with the City's goals of creating an urban center well-served by housing and transit opportunities. 3. The building's bulk and height meets the requirements of the Zoning Code. The proposal provides the one required side yard setback adjacent to its north property line where a residential zone abuts it in that location. Building and Fire Code compliance is determined when a building permit is submitted. 4. As noted,the building intrudes into public spaces at its roofline. This will have the affect, even if minimally, of blocking sunlight and the sky from public spaces. The park on the north of the site is 95 Burnett Project -- File No.: LUA00-1 7 1,SA-H,ECF April 12,2001 Page 8 • already small and narrow and the absence of a setback will crowd it even more. The fact that the building's roof detail will overhang it will make it less open. This office would recommend that the Park Division deny use of the air space. The overhang over the street is smaller and the street is wider and can suffer the incursion better although, again, as noted above,the building is already filling out the majority of its site which creates the unnecessary precedent of intruding and shading public open spaces, including sidewalk areas. 5. It would be hoped that the residential use and the nearby McLendon's, including its outside storage and its working lumber yard will be compatible neighbors. 6. The project, other than the intrusions appears well designed. It provides modulations and interesting facade elements. 7. The redevelopment of the old and fairly rundown feed mill site should help conserve property values in the area. 8. Staff has reported that the auto court entry as well as pedestrian access seems appropriate. 9. The site itself is fairly intensively developed but the auto court,upper lobby court and•two-building couplet should provide adequate light and air for the project. As well noted,the incursions into public air space will cut down the amount of light and air at the ground level in a public park and along the sidewalk. 10. The site is in the urban core and should have adequate public services. DECISION: The proposed site plan is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant is required to comply with the Mitigation Measures that were required by the Environmental Review Committee Threshold Determination. 2. The applicant shall either modify the project's roofline to remove the encroachments into the City's park property and right-of-way or obtain a Right-of-Way Use Permit from the Board of Public Works and also obtain an easement from the City to allow the air encroachments. The easement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division and the City Attorney. 3. The applicant shall submit a report by a qualified arborist evaluating the potential for construction damage to trees on the park property. The report shall make recommendations to mitigate impacts to,or replace any trees that may be damaged. The report shall be reviewed and approved by the Parks Division prior to approval of the building permit. 4. The applicant shall submit revised landscape plans incorporating recommendations from the arborist evaluation and staff recommendations for species type on the park property. The plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Parks Division prior to approval of the building permit. 5. Prior to building permit approval,the applicant shall record a new sewer easement that includes a hold harmless agreement indemnifying the City from all liability arising from maintenance to the sewer 95 Burnett Project File No.: LUA00-171,SA-H,ECF April 12,2001 Page 9 main. The easement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division and the City Attorney. 6. Prior to building permit approval, a 15-foot trail easement shall be recorded along the pedestrian connection on the north end of the property. The easement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Parks Division and the City Attorney. Plans for the pedestrian connection shall be revised to show the connection to the trail, subject to the review and approval of the Parks Division. 7. The Parks Division will have to agree to any modifications to its park and it may seek maintenance funds from the applicant for any changes that would increase park costs. 8. This office recommends that the Parks Division deny the incursions on the west side of the building that will shade and shadow the park. ORDERED THIS 12th day of April, 2001. FRED J.KAU AN HEARING E MINER TRANSMITTED THIS 12th day of April, 2001 to the parties of record: Steve Taylor Kent Smutny Paul Krakow 1055 S Grady Way Thomas Harkey Architects PDSK Properties,Inc. Renton, WA 98055 13400 Northup Way, Suite 30 621 Pacific Avenue#300 Bellevue, WA 98005 Tacoma, WA 98402 Kirk King, DDS Richard Stauff Leslie Betlach, 66 Williams Avenue S. 13813 139th Avenue SE Director,Parks Division Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98059 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 TRANSMITTED THIS 12th day of April,2001 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman,Plan/Bldg/PW Admin. Members,Renton Planning Commission Neil Watts,Development Services Director Larry Rude, Fire Marshal Sue Carlson,Econ. Dev. Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Larry Meckling,Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler South County Journal Betty Nokes,Economic Development Director 95 Burnett Project File No.: LUA00-171,SA-H,ECF April 12,2001 Page 10 Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m.,April 26,2001. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14)days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110,which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department,first floor of City Hall. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. .,•---- ; .-4- \ I L ( P ) / • ___ ......_ ._ . ‘,. -OD- -OD- ••_-03- -co , . --I-- -I-- --1-- --I- . I' ‘, • •. \ \ • f---:::::-: -..ce-, _i_f,-, -.--c. -_-_-. -.-ce. , .,..,„ - - ,._,---.... . • \ ---- P.-, •••-....< T,:: I . N , s . •,.. , ., , .., , i -OD --- ' - ' • i --.... — __i_. --I— -uu • TI RIC1Q(P) \-,Itx----: 1-1, F: ild ( P ) \ N \/ \ ...L.L....... ........._ Airport Way P tP\INN R-8 Rdr1/ .-03 -1 I 011Mimm...........I AI 1 I r :r. 1 leam . 1 N -N- >\/, \ -----r-t-677--, ....i ! i L...._! Li, _I _ ___1 , I -\\,. N\N- /-13‘. ..-8/ , . k J_____ - --1110130n,( ilti, - ! !-- k1 :P.IL.I. -.d,D rok.amum:u N- -... N..,/><- - III i in-T-7-1---0: 11 1 ..118 i . ., . _. .__ --,. -, -L" --ry.. i ' 7 i_ ..------! _ . N--....N, N.N.: - - ... . . let{ 2— • ---1-1 .--- _I----Ce- '...... — \— ; ------ 4 C D ( P ) 5.vr Ii (44. u _CO itill_u ..,.. —,1 . _. ____ - --- --- _A__.\___ , fl 4p ,-. 1 o-_ -_--_--=. CD CD --" ) :---- 11.3 ---i-- - \ ___! ) S 2n.d St _._..._ _ ._chn--- I N ........1...._ S 2nd St. - ....,,_ • _._1/ i i ------- ---C-D- , i • -. ---- I ri . . 1 _11.____ --I • ......... ..... ... .. 1 ---- -- -- -- - 1 I q A' - -.1c/-:)_ ---- . - . — CD — CD ; / k--- . H____ -.,,,C --- CD =-1---4/ i ---- LJL -- - -1-1---- ...„. I IS 3rid StEr: cP-1 I Oir I 1 I -ril.- ----, — --- -.7: :-_-.1---,----- °R -1--7---"7-- ----"--_,.___T. ICD4 1 ri' Icp' I 1 ' ' Icil Ic -- I 1 i L. i I 1 ic4 .cpli p, 1 , . , Lci2 _ r., • ° 6 1\11- 13rd 1 Pl. —77. 787 =cm : 0331.- ----cac.D. C1:1 CD(P) \ CD ._.._ A *----- ---'31- — -4----) - r.- •____ __ . ____ -_-_.7.: ....._._ ____. IMI•limm.r \ C VA X1 &--C_I I 9 7 ..tT.Y.------ •-%",1--.0 T 1r it I up c0 N a d 11111 • uj 1 i• ::il . • I _ ---'-. 0PIIIIIII 1 ETT AVENUE SOUTH { — — - LLL r .er,rit • A / w`"`"''"" BUILDING ENTRANCE FROM • — N ,r- - .•a• ', _SOUTH DY.MCa&KIN W.W.I t r • "bb33 ,.•r _ ems. , ora.wKr`�- .>,r s.•! ;,4:-.: ,; a ,.•,+tjtW .� �'1 III/� ..c, � • . ..:.r.c,,,a..r,e,._ u.._,...,,..t;,:y,__P' e.'4„ , _ ...:,>•_.P:^Ma... _ _ rt+ hl (9 .......... ....... ....., _.... :.., ...>>... ,: ._. ..,.>.-.....,.y ....... _,- ,., 1 „,,.,.-,,. ...:,-:,,•:4::;:-X,<:.mow:.... 4,wi \ i ;ExS '[r•izy� - _.:.::. -._. .,,....:rz._.r., ..,.,e..eTr.i. , -_, ... .. _.._ _ v;N::,x-^ _ z,+.`c" _��'jj1��� CU P,0 Irfr /7' ffy •V3i Akt. Z 41' O t�/ ��in ir Il if •..I 9 PROPOS •AL OCOU• ...., A.,z,.,.......,...„ ,,.. . ,,. ... r^„ :'4:^"v,-r,_.c.rv.7rf:gt':^,.;:w,-�?:S:L.,.,,,r v,.:S; ,e:-x::.^,.sr.....,,,a,„,„,,,,. 4.,..4..,,,„,,, ,..,:„.....2,7,f, �):A..Pni4�''i: ^4.:jp..�,:,,.aN:-.:..?r::,.�vJx. pe,;y_^ �„^, 33 ,1.A.39�r.v:.+!�>` / .r. ...._,..., / v,v.___:..1- .... �m.;.r!:^:e...x.:.4.^ng,-,,.v..>a.:.x...^x;..r, .",,p... .. ...N„x�,N:.:,,.: .._,:a.... :,:,......._... .v..x::.. :,_ .....£..^.._.,;.,.... .e_�..::.... ,. �I�~�'� l• , .. / , /do, // ',Ai-le- - .90- r li i ow fi.„:,.. . Yr- . —.....4.4 ./iripomm.mg j ,.:j .;,..Rv,...;q:ti. :!'c.,...'„e,.„! :,...r_c.. ...N,^. PJ..P.,..e, v- .... ,...,?�xt., ri., :.. ... ;,..xe;:...:>.,+�4:,!!,•. t_>..*u,,.N \ .... ...e.. / I '2 •;,,..fie-:,,^,., ... >:,� y .....n„.,>•e ?►_.. wit*..... ,„,.� .�:..v...^, r'r,.ve,»..:,, ,m: /'/f.Iii ... ..:i _..... „m :,�i...a..._..__...r_..::,e,r<_._..., x_.-..._ P.Pi..e_,-;,... vr•]r.,.f�.:.a::.........:!�.�:,,,.:.e�_-..-e.,...._....^.' ..IMxn,z�.n2,.,...3.... �.r. rri rl/ .a .r...._ - - i:... e,...:..+_v,.,n= _iS r 'S�. I / ... ..,..v:,,.,.r,.#-,L.,.,I .,:.3• ,.^.,,✓�„_e..1.:+.,pA. - :Ni.., ���a';M ti9125!' .�_f_.._.-.o-rx,.!�/i /♦ r^"� .._-..P,..,_ -=ti,"Y �>S.aa, .-, • �4.,,-.....�.....,.-�, ''M�w... - ,��� �^ I//%r�/,�Prr..::a-..,•...;�'K;a=`;%,>f f,ad��....?,.� ..:rv<a-= ,.z.'F<:v;°�ysai?<t�4:F;;,t..tA _.ors. ,,, -r... carry..mw:,:�w,,: CQ� .v maran. rcraa'eT " .. araac _ FOR PARC DEVELOPMENT BEE LANDSCAPE LS 'v'° PEDESTRIAN MALL CONNECTION c •a o . .. •a• V , • 11 FROM BURNETT AVENUE TO PARK rxr worJn+ I • • ] )X Q u oiu.w tworrw E • Q • BH rwvKw •6 ',�, Y ' WnI1YYar • y O BURNETT PLACE SOUTH if o = i h N SITE PLAN rn Cbrp scam e F 0 ProJeel T.am 0 • rmwYw ra 0 nmaoamma PO N Wool IT PO*MO m,ra O wn:o,.r IL NM O O Site Plan N Approval I al A1.1 O LOGAN AVENUE SOUTH _ � /• r Ills • �(O CO0 AMMLT 14 D (1 MN TRILLS u°°ea MILL% , .zi. Ar.Nuota. .mxo / oiI I MSS UnM,, MT/L OWRDR4L H L OSOOY --_—___ILL OL.II—�.' �w ROO• NNfa . d� j N.IYcL- r- ' '-,r i,��; a \IIIY 7f uir,-- �IpII/.:. : ::-�II`AA I I% ..._ - ii i - _I� t=1 [UOIil _ i_ JII1W .W o - __ AwPLoeLKL I_®®® �IL ®m - ^. -_ ^ OM ill ill E 1111 11i1 ��1 i1 ®® i1 ii ®® e i44-2EI_{E -1 i= = � _-1_ _=! _ -- TLM-L�EI.q4, E=- -- el_ TF� � 00 O0 - QO _ Q qr�i! ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 0 0 ❑ O ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ D O ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ O ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ - pr-...4 .aiig� N O _ r n _ ®j �- 1 . 11i1 t il i 1:i,, Iz1.1 r'+ III 1 ® ® o I. � /. , aur J CO _ ` —r- 0 SPLIT PACS CPC.SLCOCS \--Lill CP DOTS Ort/011 Gfa ALMK.TCRPACNT ISPOCOLOOOR .PLR PAC[CMG.SLACKS BUILDING"A" '�" 10 a) 1 EAST ELEVATION oWALL 3/33'4.0' ct M O v AOPNALT W.aLSO AMMLT.w•OLC. 1.1 L V10.1 000 M /VW.MOM vrm SrROng Y -o eTL4No.,..a I— .'/L MY1®WL i WVKR EL.r1T1 , iI I $,oi"u, ----I-- =ii n�� \II Mid II%-- --\II���IV \II�i1�II%.:—'i� -- - `�II.fiIll/' J i - i.V u_u1 ■■■ it"_ill ■W■ ■i'fi ill Alf__I IT - 3 O Tome"noon eL..P./,,_ i 11111 __ _ _ _ __ nil =_- Rl LOAM o _ -iil -iil 11l11 !!I :-1 11�11. 1111 ®® ii1 - '� ® 11�11 ® ® ""''"�µ` ® 1 N -1- a To ALOCR nn•°••�- i s ____ =1_I_ =1__ =I=_ =1==9= - al r ........... ■��I i ffi ■" 1. F 9 f9l f i FFI: Jf7fi-- f�9 ■■ f99 fig f f ® ® [- E- O 6 Torrx/e n.•ir _ __ 0 . ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ 0 • ■ 0 ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑O 'dill ❑❑ PToJICL Team aun• i.. °Ir.Ui}•'1':-�I.I Ii'.,1/I �1UI..-.r.0 I` U` 'Ir:I i. 1t=1.■1 ft'. I II`III.J'.I IvI1.1�..Ii I�''�II�1�!�... �' IIpTCfAMILR: (y N�wwe.r[imraou�_- r, r, 1 / C` F L" �' 1++++++.++ PG 1.1 PO • o 1'ST.+L.RAM. A1.11 .rOP0401i ao a,Doo L I oDWI m w 0 lM O mieme 1 OJIAO6 EL ~net AL M,e, Ii.IL UC1811P UAi! �T - GR�d�yP r!,700 o .PLAPAC[GMLL BUILDING"A" -NigPian • Approval I WEST ELEVATION ..-- -- 01 SCAUls3/ 0-17 A5.1 1 Co co Y! • AIPMALT PHNOM N 1OVA100 43N WIT veal.$9) y ' YL'WtN LU .1Y000 T1�L M1TL Moog WI �1 1 yY V 1 veal atom 1 EL.,M•Taplpre --- -- �/ - =�-n_ --- u \Il a■.. I►7� lii. _ ..11%. . I z 1 � ■ 11 _PPP • ❑ pis I I Y Nam,.-----t-� ® ® ® ® - 1 ❑ ❑ I gTO.VD•ILDOR 0...0.' ^ �IG�LL--- 4-3 Eri 0 TGt•.T.Lae.L.11LLI /VI0 n� . - i col um c. CDSPIT r.ca G is LPN O WWII own* w MAI..MM0R.6 o BUILDING"A" 17) .8 NORHT ELEVATION aSCAMDAr•.r.p• r) ct 0 1 U 1 — , ?avow R.,� I l in a� �❑ ❑� I ® ® ioi�.tam i � p�Q = 1zii A Y 01 xex�a�mL—� fp 0 — 11.11 rti R " a Ell [1] . ! ; In O I-- —Ii7 H—ie - R i N Fri iR E ❑ ❑ iil ; / 0, ❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑ TDI.Ta/u..1..: . o i 0 I rlmara`aca 4 P►oJam Team Mal WU Id N LTa 0 Da.Tl WYDS RO=P Mirtal PO OM IT PO 0 BUILDING"B" 0`Oa0ST"' 00 o SOUTH ELEVATION ait.P wD Plan N SCAM •Ir.o•. Approval I to - A5.4 0 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Barbara Alther, first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the _ NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL - , . ENVIRONMENDETEB`MIT ALIRENVIEW COMMITTEE , • • 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 RENTON;WASHINGTON, I I The ,Envirammelntal SRe'Viewl a daily newspaper published seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal i Committee'has issued a Determination I of Non-Significance-Mitigated""for the newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six 'following project under the authority of months prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the the Renton Municipal Code.9 English language continuallyas a dailynewspaper in Kent, KingCounty, L -0 71 T PROJECT 9 9 Y LUA- 0-1`71�SA H,E-aCF Washington. The South County Journal has been approved as a legal Environmental review for proposed newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King construction of four-story apartment building with 118 dwelling units. County. • Location: 73,75,77&95 Burnett Ave. The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the South So. _ , - County Journal (and not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to Appeals of the environmental !determination must be filed in writing the subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a on or before 5:00 PM February 26, 12001. Appeals must be filed in writing 95 Burnett Project i with the required $75.0 appl ca io fee with:Hearing Exam nerr,, ;City of Renton, 1055 South Grady as published on: 2/12/01 ,Way. Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to !the Examiner are governed by City of The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of , ;Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8- 110. Additional information regarding $65.63, charged to Acct. No. 8051067. the appeal process may be obtained ,from the Renton City Clerk's Office, Legal Number 8724 (425)-430-6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, / Washington, on March 13, 2001 at t �.c /� • 9:00 AM to consider the proposed Site _-_ Legal erk, South County Journal Plan. If the environmental determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public Subscribed and sworn before me on this((Qdayof / " 6� 2001 hearing. . Published in the South County ``````%11111 M/ Journal Fe`.bruary 12,2001.8724 j ,o 0,1 FA M. F �,,i ``� 41. �SSION f riA'..e, , �a R 1' Q -0- ? 10 PUBLN4 _ Notary Public of the State of Washington �`5:% o Roza residing in Renton �',,�9re ?6 ;?Q.,�, `.N� King County, Washington i. CITY OF RENTON- HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC:HEARING MARCH 13, 2001 AGENDA.. COMMENCING AT 90.0 AM, COUNCIL CHAMBERS '7TH FLOOR, RENTON CITY HALL The application(s):listed are in order of application number only and:not necessarily tte order in which they will be heard. Items will be called:for hearing at'the discretion.of the Hearing Examiner. PROJECT NAME: 95 Burnett Project PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-00-171,SA PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed project includes the demolition of Lande Feed Mill and several small commercial buildings to construct a four-story apartment structure containing 118 dwelling units. The density for the project is approximately 91 dwelling units/acre. The first floor will contain structured parking with 164 stalls. Vehicular access is via Burnett Avenue South. The property is zoned Center Downtown (CD). The proposed project will include the removal and replacement of 4 trees and the addition of a small plaza in the adjacent park. A pedestrian connection from the park trail to Burnett Avenue South will be created on the north side of the building. Additionally, the project will remove two underground storage tanks. One tank is located onsite; the other is located just off-site on park property. Location: 73, 75, 77 and 95 Burnett Avenue South. PROJECT NAME: Rolling Hills Reservoir Rezone PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-01-008, R PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The subject proposal is the rezoning of a 12.97 acre City owned site at the intersection of Puget Drive SE and Edmonds Ways SE from Public Use (P-1) Zone to Residential — 8 du/ac (R-8) Zone, with a P-Suffix designation. The subject site is one of approximately 50 P-1 rezones that the City is conducting as it assimilates this older redundant zone into its more recent and traditional type of land use classifications, which also typically allow public facilities such as schools, fire stations, reservoirs, etc. Medium and large utilities are allowed in the R-8 Zone, as conditional uses. After updating its Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance in 1993 with interim land use designations and zoning, it was decided in 1994 to phase out the older P-1 Zone. Location: The 12.97-acre subject site is located at 2401 Puget Drive SE near the intersection of Puget Drive SE and Edmonds Way SE. hexagenda , City of Renton PUBLIC Department of Planning/Building/Public Works HEARING PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Public Hearing Date: March 13, 2001 Project Name: 95 Burnett Applicant/ PDSK Properties, Inc. Address: 621 Pacific Avenue#300 Tacoma, WA 98402 Owner/ Philip M. Lande Rudy& Beverly Starkovich Address: 9037 38th Avenue SW 810 N. Riverside Drive Seattle, WA 98126 Renton, WA 98055 File Number: LUA-00-171, SA-H, ECF Planner: Steve Taylor • Project Description: The proposed project includes the demolition of Lande Feed Mill and several small commercial buildings to construct a four-story apartment structure containing 118 dwelling units. The density for the project is approximately 91 dwelling units/acre. The first floor will contain structured parking with 164 stalls. Vehicular access is via Burnett Avenue South. The property is zoned Center Downtown (CD). The proposed project will include the removal and replacement of 4 trees and the addition of a small plaza in the adjacent park. A pedestrian connection from the park trail to Burnett Avenue South will be created on the north side of the building. Additionally, the project will remove two underground storage tanks. One tank is located onsite; the other is located just off-site on park property. Project Location: 73, 75, 77 and 95 Burnett Avenue South - I • w:_ �, I' - j. rya: ,CGS... , 1.40•••PiNgegua — --Ni, -\, - .-- - , 2/Pie,--- p F gx ".� -�a `� � *L Vtte4 ;.-- d , . 6.,„ nx .• r, ,6-NN, Nts..41;>.. ,A.., (,/^��, a mil. 'IN �'.-t_!f�1 4, �.� .4.,:N.:,'\ •`M� GI - �I , i s i . 7g4) I � .rtz, . VA • . •r,. or • MAW �r 7UA a1 iva 5� Midi FM il�r3 �CaP7.-• .Ce 21:11Z I54.. • . s Om r . City of Renton P/B/PW Department Pr_, ,K Iary Report to the Hearing Examiner 95 BURNETT LUA-00-171, SA-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE:March 13,2001 Page 2 of 10 B. EXHIBITS The following exhibits are entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, environmental review and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Drawing A1.1, Site Plan (Received March 5, 2001). Exhibit No. 5: Drawing A5.1, East Elevations (Received March 5, 2001). Exhibit No. 6: Drawing A5.2, West Elevations (Received March 5, 2001). Exhibit No. 7: Drawing A5.3,Auto Court Elevations (Received March 5, 2001). Exhibit No. 8: Drawing C3.0, Water and Sanitary Sewer Plan (Received December 21, 2000). Exhibit No. 9: Drawing L1.1, Landscape Plan — Street Frontage and Parkway (Received March 5, 2001). Exhibit No. 10: Neighborhood Map Exhibit No. 11: Zoning Map C. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Philip M. Lande Rudy& Beverly Starkovich 9037 38th Avenue SW 810 N. Riverside Drive Seattle,WA 98126 Renton, WA 2. Zoning Designation: Center Downtown (CD) 3. Comprehensive Plan Center Downtown (CD) Land Use Designation: 4. Existing Site Use: The Lande Feed Mill and a computer recycling business occupy the southern portion of the site. The northern portion of the site is occupied by Canber Corps, Purcell Painting, Inc and Northwest Pneumatic& Electric Repair. 5. Neighborhood Characteristics North: 4-story Renton Housing—Senior Housing Apartment Complex; Residential Multi-Family- Urban (RM-U)zone East: McLendon Hardware Storage Yard, Center Downtown (CD)zone South: Garage and single family structure, Center Downtown (CD)zone West: A City Park (portion of the Cedar River Trail) now occupies what was formerly railroad right-of-way. Single family homes are located on the west side of Burnett PI. South; Center Downtown (CD)zones 6. Access: Burnett Avenue South 7. Site Area: 56,557-sf(1.298 acres) 8. Project Data: area comments Existing Building Area: All existing buildings will be removed. N/A 95 Burnett HEXRPT.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department - Prc, ary Report to the Hearing Examiner 95 BURNETT LUA-00-171, SA-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE:March 13,2001 Page 3 of 10 New Building Area: 56,557-sf N/A Total Building Area: 56,557-sf N/A D. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date Zoning N/A 4404 06/07/93 Comprehensive Plan N/A 4498 02/20/95 Original City of Renton Plat N/A N/A 1901 E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (RMC TITLE IV): 1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts Section 4-2-070:Zoning Use Table Section 4-2-120.B: Commercial Development Standards 2. Chapter 3 Environmental Regulations and Special Districts Section 4-3-100: Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations 3. Chapter 4 Property Development Standards Section 4-4-030: Development Guidelines and Regulations—General Section 4-4-070: Landscaping Regulations Section 4-4-080: Parking, Loading, and Driveway Regulations Section 4-4-090: Refuse and Recyclables Standards 4. Chapter 6 Streets and Utility Standards 5. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria Section 4-9-200: Site Plan Review 6. Chapter 11 Definitions F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Land Use Element 2. Environmental Element 3. Downtown Element 4. Economic Development 5. Housing Element G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND A four-story, 118-unit apartment building is proposed on a 1.3-acre site located on the west side of Burnett Avenue S. at approximately S. Tobin Street. The site is currently occupied by Lande Feed Mill, Purcell Painting, Inc, Canber Corps and Northwest Pneumatic & Electric Repair. All existing structures will be removed during development. The project is being constructed basically as two buildings, 3-stories of residential over a parking garage. The two halves of the building are connected at a central lobby area with a second story courtyard above. The building will be 50-feet in height at the peak of the roof. The property is zoned Center Downtown (CD). The density for the project is approximately 91 dwelling units/acre. 95 Burnett HEXRPT.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department PI__..__ciary Report to the Hearing Examiner 95 BURNETT LUA-00-171,SA-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE:March 13,2001 Page 4 of 10 Both pedestrian and vehicular access is via Burnett Avenue South via a central courtyard leading to the building entrance. There are separate parking garages on the north and south side of the courtyard. The first floor of the building will contain structured parking with 164 stalls. The courtyard also contains a small water feature. The east side of the parking garage will be modulated and softened by landscaping. Burnett Avenue South will be improved along site frontage with curb, gutter, sidewalk, lighting and street trees. The property is bordered on the west by a City park, part of the Cedar River Trail, which was formerly a railroad right-of-way. The park consists of lawn and trees with a pedestrian trail. Due to their location, the proposal includes the removal and replacement of 4 trees (3 on park property) and the addition of a small plaza in the adjacent park. The roofline of the building intrudes slightly into the air space of the park on the west side of the building and the right of way on the east. The applicant is pursuing a Right-of-Way Use Permit and proposes an exchange of easements, the air rights for a trail easement for a pedestrian connection from the park trail to Burnett Avenue South. Additionally, the project will remove two underground storage tanks (550 & 2,644 gallons) associated with the Lande Feed Mill. One tank is located onsite; the other is located just off-site on park property. Environmental studies indicated the presence of contaminated soils that will be removed prior to development. The project also includes the replacement of a sewer connection from Burnett Place S. to Burnett Avenue S. The parking garage (first story) is being build at ground level. Except for needed structural fill and soil abatement, no excavation is proposed. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971 as amended), on February 6, 2001 the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance, Mitigated for the Service Linen Expansion. The DNS-M included seven mitigation measures. A 14-day appeal period commenced on February 12, 2001 and ended on February 26, 2001. No appeals of the threshold determination were filed. 3. ERC MITIGATION MEASURES Based on an analysis of probable impacts from the proposed project, the following mitigation measures were issued for the Determination of Non-Significance—Mitigated: 1. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations of the Geotech Consultants Inc. May 20, 1999 geotechnical study with regard to site preparation and building foundations. 2. All underground storage tanks associated with the development shall be removed and any soil contamination abated per Department of Ecology regulations. Documentation of compliance with this mitigation measure by DOE shall be submitted prior to building permit approval. 3. All soil and water contamination identified in the two site environmental studies conducted by Environmental Associates, Inc. must be abated to DOE standards. Documentation of compliance by DOE shall be submitted prior to building permit approval. 4. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $388 per new multi- family unit. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to issuance of a building permit. 5. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The required mitigation shall be paid prior to issuance of a building permit. 6. The applicant shall pay a Parks Department mitigation fee of$354.51 per new multi-family unit. The required mitigation fee shall be paid prior to building permit approval. 95 Burnett HEXRPT.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Pr_:...:=Nary Report to the Hearing Examiner 95 BURNETT LUA-00-171,SA-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE:March 13,2001 Page 5 of 10 7. Prior to demolition of the Lande Feed Store, the applicant shall contract with a commercial pest control company to conduct and implement a rodent abatement program. This program shall be reviewed and approved by the Development Services Division and a report submitted by the pest control service verifying the program has been fully implemented prior to approval of the demolition permit. 4. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address site plan issues from the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. 5. CONSISTENCY WITH SITE PLAN APPROVAL CRITERIA As per RMC 4-9-200.E, "The Reviewing Official shall review and act upon site plans based upon comprehensive planning considerations and the following criteria. These criteria are objectives of good site plans to be aimed for in development within the City of Renton. However, strict compliance with any one or more particular criterion may not be necessary or reasonable. These criteria also provide a frame of reference for the applicant in developing a site, but are not intended to be inflexible standards or to discourage creativity and innovation. The site plan review criteria include, but are not limited to, the following": (A) CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ITS ELEMENTS & POLICIES The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation for the project property is Center Downtown (CD). The intent of the"Center"designation is to create a balance of land uses which contribute to the revitalization of downtown Renton and to reinforce downtown Renton as the regional commercial district in the City. (Objectives DT-A and DT-B) The following Comprehensive Plan policies are applicable to the proposal: Policy DT-1. There should be a mix of uses, including retail, office, light industrial and residential, which generate the demand for goods and services. The proposed use is residential apartments. Future occupants will generate a demand for goods and services lending to the redevelopment of the Downtown Core. Policy DT-3. Development and redevelopment of Center Downtown should strive for urban density and intensity of uses. Policy DT-24. Net residential development densities in the downtown area should achieve a range of 25-100 dwelling units per acre. The project's 91 dwelling units/acre density will help the City meet its obligation under the growth targets mandated by the Growth Management Act(GMA). Policy DT-5. Redevelopment of the downtown area should be encouraged to maintain and revitalize the downtown core The proposed use will provide a more intensive use of an underdeveloped site and create housing opportunities. Policy DT-42. Pedestrian spaces should be emphasized and connected throughout the downtown. The project proposes to create a new pedestrian connection from Burnett Avenue South to the Cedar River trail network. 95 Burnett HEXRPT.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Piz+ .,,',ary Report to the Hearing Examiner 95 BURNETT LUA-00-171,SA-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE:March 13, 2001 Page 6 of 10 Policy LU-15. Encourage a city-wide mix of housing types including large lot and small lot single family development, small-scale and large-scale multi-family housing, and residential mixed-use development. Policy LU-17. Larger multi-family development projects are encouraged in the downtown area, the Center Office Residential and the Multi-family Residential—Infill designations. Policy H-7. Promote high quality residential living environments in all types of neighborhoods. Policy H-8. Encourage distribution of diverse housing types and unit sizes throughout the city. The project provides for the multi-family mix in residential units and is located in the Downtown Core Policy LU-111.1. Residential uses are intended to connect to other uses in the Center through design features such as pedestrian access, shared parking areas, and common open spaces. The project incorporates pedestrian connections and common open space features into it design Policy LU-112. Minimize the percentage of land devoted to surface parking by encouraging shared parking and development of parking structures The project provides structured parking for the units. (B) CONFORMANCE WITH LAND USE REGULATIONS The subject site is zoned Center Downtown (CD). The CD zone is established to provide for a wide variety of uses including commercial, residential, entertainment and personal/professional services. The CD zone allows multi-family residential uses as a primary permitted use at densities ranging between 25 and 100 dwelling units per net acre. The proposed project includes 118 multi-family dwelling units on a 56,557 square foot site (1.298 acres), calculating to a net density of 90.91 dwelling units per acre. Development Standards The subject site is located in the"Downtown Core Area." Projects within the Downtown Core Area are exempt from most development standards of the CD zone; including parking requirements, setbacks, lot coverage and landscape requirements. Lot Coverage — The footprint for the building will cover most of the site. In fact the roof eaves encroach into the park air space at four locations on the west property line (two 4' and two 7' intrusions, 45-feet in the air). Four 2' intrusions are also proposed into the street right-of-way on Burnett Avenue South, at the same height. The applicant is proposing to exchange a 15-foot pedestrian trail easement along the north property line for an easement for the roof encroachment on the park property. The applicant is preparing an application to the Board of Public Works for a Right-of Way Use Permit for the air encroachment into the public right-of-way. Staff recommends that site plan approval be subject to approval of the easement and the Right- of-Way Use Permit by the City. If these approvals are not forthcoming, the project should be revised to eliminate any encroachment. Setbacks / Landscaping — No setbacks or landscape requirements are applied to CD zoned properties in the Downtown Core Area, unless the property abuts residentially zoned parcels. In this instance the project is located abutting the RM-U zone (4-story Senior Housing) on the north property line. The applicant is proposing a 16-foot landscaped setback containing a pedestrian connection on this side of the building. Other portions of the site do not abut residentially zoned parcels. The proposal includes several landscaped courtyards. One located above the lobby, another on the north side of the building and a small urban plaza and landscaping in the adjacent park area. Street trees are also proposed for the Burnett Avenue S.frontage. 95 Burnett HEXRPT.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department -- Pn...:-iary Report to the Hearing Exami► 95 BURNETT LUA-00-171,SA-H,El PUBLIC HEARING DATE:March 13, 2001 Page 7 of The relocation of the sewer main and the removal a 50-foot by 3-foot underground storage tai on the park property will require extensive modifications to portions of the park. The applicant proposing to remove 3 trees on the park property and one additional tree onsite. Due to the clo: proximity of several of the park trees to the property line, there is the potential that their rc system may be damaged during construction. Staff recommends that this potential be evaluate by a certified arborist and that a report be submitted prior to approval of the building perr documenting their recommendations. The proponents have proposed surface modulations to break up the visual appearance of tl facades along Barnett Avenue S. Landscaping is proposed to soften and provide additior articulation to the expanse of the parking garage wall. The applicant has submitted a prelimine landscape plan that enhances the visual character of the building. Staff would like to work wl the landscape architect on final plant selection for the park property since the City will I maintaining the vegetation in the future. Final landscape plans should also incorporate tl recommendations of the arborist evaluation. Staff recommends that a revised landscape plan I submitted and subject to approval of the Development Services Division. Height— The CD zone allows a maximum building height of 95 feet. The average height of tl proposed building at the parapets is approximately 40 feet above the ground level. The maximu building height is 50 feet. The highest building elevation would be approximately 88 feet abo' sea level, which meets the Airport zoning horizontal surface height limit of 179 feet above si level. Parking, Loading, and Driveway Regulations — There are no parking requirements in tl Downtown Core Area. The proposal includes a parking garage that provides 164 parking sta dedicated to the 118 residential units. If the project were located outside the Downtown Co Area a minimum of 159 parking stalls would have been required. 76. of the parking stalls a tandem parking. These stalls will be assigned to specific apartments. The parking garage is accessed from an auto court via Burnett Avenue South. 81 stalls a provided on the north side of the building and 83 stalls on the south side. The conceptual parking plan conforms to the minimum requirements for drive aisle dimensioi and the provision of ADA accessible parking stalls. Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations All attached residential (multi-family) development and commercial/residential mixed tx development in the Center Downtown (CD) zone requires design review according to tl minimum standards and guidelines listed in the Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations. Ste analysis and recommended conditions are provided in a separate report and the decision approve is made by the Development Services Administrator. (C) MITIGATION OF IMPACTS TO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND USE The subject site is located in the center of downtown Renton and is surrounded by commercia zoned and high-density residential uses. The proposed multi-family residential use is n expected to adversely impact surrounding properties. In fact, the residential use is clea supported by Comprehensive Plan policies and envisioned for the revitalization of downtou Renton. Construction activities would result in some noise, dust and traffic impacts on surrounding properties. These impacts would be limited to the construction phase of the project, which is estimated to be have a total duration of approximately 16 months (April 2001 to August 2002). The applicant has submitted a Construction Mitigation Plan outlining mitigation measures to be employed for minimizing dust, noise and traffic impacts during construction. Potential short-term noise and traffic impacts would result from the initial construction of tl project. Existing code provisions that limit construction work hours, and the applican construction mitigation plan, which indicates proposed work hours from 7:00 am to 5:00 pi Monday through Friday,would mitigate these impacts. (D) MITIGATION OF IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN TO THE SITE 95 Burnett HEXRPT.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Pr,__:Lary Report to the Hearing Examir 95 BURNETT LUA-00-171,SA-H,EC PUBLIC HEARING DATE:March 13,2001 Page 8 of Geotech Consultants, Inc conducted a geotechnical evaluation of the site and a report dated Mr 20, 1999 was submitted for review. Subsurface conditions were evaluated by drilling four borinc that encountered loose fill and alluvial soils overlying dense, gravelly sands. Due to the potent for unacceptable settlement if conventional foundations were used, the report recommended th building loads be carried on deep foundations. It stated that augercast piers are the most suitab deep foundation option as vibrations from driven pilings could potentially cause damage surrounding structures. The report also indicated that on-grade slabs can be used, but should reinforced with steel bars to reduce cracking due to differential settlement. Pavement sectior should be supported over imported, gravelly structural fill. On-site soils are not useable f structural fill, including backfill. Geotech Consultants, Inc. also coordinated an underground storage tank (UST) location and so, sampling effort on the Lande Feed site and a report dated May 28, 1999 was submitted for reviel The report located two UST's, an estimated 550 gallon tank located on the south east portion site and a larger 2,644 gallon tank located just off-site on City of Renton Park Property. The o site tank appeared to contain gasoline and the off-site tank was thought to contain heating oil feed lines were identified leading into the furnace room of the Lande Feed building. Two borinc were taken on the Lande site and tested for diesel and oil range hydrocarbons. No contaminatic was found in the analyzed samples. No borings or soil samples were taken in the vicinity of if off-site tank. Environmental Associates, Inc (EAI) conducted subsurface sampling and testing of the northe portion of the proposed project site (Starkovich Property), now occupied by Canber Corps, Pura Painting, Inc and Northwest Pneumatic & Electric Repair. A report dated February 10, 2000 wa submitted for review. It appears that portions of this property contained a bulk petroleu distribution facility prior to the early-to-mid 1960's. The scope of the February 2000, study was to specifically look at the southern portion of tt Starkovitch property, addressed 75 & 77 Burnett Avenue S. now occupied by Purcell Painting, Ir and Northwest Pneumatic & Electric Repair. The report indicated that no soil or groundwat, contamination was indicated in the samples taken. An earlier investigation was conducted in September of 1999 by EAI on the northern portion of tk Starkovitch property, addressed 73 Burnett Avenue South and now occubied by Canber Corp The report revealed that contaminants were found in the soil and ground water that exceed( Washington Department of Ecology thresholds requiring cleanup. To address probable environmental impacts to the soil and water, ERC mitigation measur( require that both tanks be removed during the development of this project. At that time, addition soils sampling in the areas of the tanks shall be conducted and contaminated soils (if preser shout. be properly disposed of in accordance with local, state, and federal regulation Additi nally, all soil and water contamination identified in the site environmental studies conduct( by EAI must be abated to DOE standards and documentation of compliance submitted to the Cit: Potential erosion impacts that could occur during project construction would be adequate mitigated by City Code requirements for approval of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentatic Control Plan (TESCP) pursuant to the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDII and a Construction Mitigation Plan prior to issuance of Construction Permits. (E) CONSERVATION OF AREA-WIDE PROPERTY VALUES The proposed multi-family development is expected to increase property values in the vicinity the site. Adding residential population to downtown would improve the customer base f commercial businesses and this is also expected to increase property values. (F) SAFETY AND EFFICIENCY OF VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION Vehicles will enter and exit the parking garage via an on-site auto court with access from BurnE Avenue S. The project is located in the central business district and therefore parking exempt. the project were subject to parking ratios, the City would impose a minimum requirement of 1 f. 95 Burnett HEXRPT.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Pro„.•,i my Report to the Hearing Exami 95 BURNETT LUA-00-171, SA-H,E PUBLIC HEARING DATE:March 13,2001 Page 9 of stalls (1.2 stalls for each 1 BR/studio & 1.6 stalls for each 2 BR apartment). The applicant voluntarily proposing to provide 164 parking stalls in structured parking located under the buildin The development would result in an increase in traffic trips on the local street system a therefore would be subject to the City's Transportation Mitigation Fee. A Traffic Impact Analys dated November 29, 2000, by Transportation Planning & Engineering, Inc. was submitted review. The analysis estimated that 418 additional average daily trips would be generated by tl project. To offset the impacts to the City's transportation facilities, a Transportation Mitigation F is calculated at $75 per average daily trip attributable to the project. The traffic mitigation fee this project is estimated to be$31,350. The parking plan appears to provide adequate aisle widths and backout distances for the safe a efficient circulation of vehicles. Construction truck hauling hours are limited to between 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. under t Development Guidelines Ordinance in order to avoid conflicts with peak hour traffic. The Trai Planning Section will review construction-related impacts prior to issuing final constructi permits. A pedestrian connection from Burnett Avenue South to the park property is proposed. Drawin show the pedestrian plaza but not the connection to the, trail. Staff recommends that a 15' tr easement be recorded to the benefit of the City and that details showing the connection to the tr be submitted with the building permit and subject to the review and approval of the Developmc Services Division. (G) PROVISION OF ADEQUATE LIGHT AND AIR The residential units comprise the upper three stories of the proposed building. The resident units are on top of the parking garage and various modulations and articulations break up t building mass. This allows adequate natural light and air to reach all the residential units. T height of the proposed building is not expected to cast significant shade impacts on surroundi buildings. (H) MITIGATION OF NOISE, ODORS AND OTHER HARMFUL OR UNHEALTHY CONDITIONS Several neighbors have contacted the City regarding a perceived increase in rodent infestati now that the Lande Feed Store has begun clearing out the building. The ERC evaluated tt potential impact to the neighborhood and required a rodent abatement program be implement prior to demolition of the Feed Store. It is anticipated that the most significant noise, odor and other potentially harmful impacts wot occur during the construction phase of the project. The applicant has submitted a Constructi Mitigation Plan that provides measures to reduce construction impacts such as noise, control dust, traffic controls, etc. The proposed development would not generate any harmful or unhealthy conditions. There wot be noise impacts of increased traffic and activity that are normally associated with a resident population. (I) AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES TO ACCOMMODATE TF PROPOSED USE Fire Department and Police staff have indicated existing facilities are adequate to accommods the subject proposal, subject to the applicant's payment of the necessary impact fees. , imposed by the ERC, the applicant will be required to pay Fire and Traffic Mitigation fees prior the issuance of building permits. The existing sanitary sewer main and easement is proposed to be relocated and will run under t lobby and auto court. Staff recommends that a new sewer easement will need to be record which contains a "hold harmless agreement". This agreement will protect the City should a damage to the structure occur during routine maintenance of the sewer main. 95 Burnett HEXRPT.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Pro_ _ at)/Report to the Hearing Exami 95 BURNETT LUA-00-171, SA-H,E PUBLIC HEARING DATE:March 13,2001 Page 10 of Water service and other utilities are available in Burnett Avenue South and would be extended necessary to the building by the applicant. The Renton School District has indicated they have adequate facilities to serve the childr generated by this project. Children would attend Lakeridge Elementary, Dimmitt Jr. High a Renton High School. (J) PREVENTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD DETERIORATION AND BLIGHT The proposal would redevelop and improve a site that contains deteriorating buildings, one which was partially destroyed by a fire in recent years. The investment in the area and the add presence of a residential population would serve to prevent neighborhood deterioration and bligl H. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the 95 Burnett Site Plan Review Application, Project File No. LUA-( 171, SA-H, ECF subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant is required to comply with the Mitigation Measures that were required by t Environmental Review Committee Threshold Determination. 2. The applicant shall either modify the project's roofline to remove the encroachments into the Cit park property and right-of-way or obtain a Right-of-Way Use Permit from the Board of Public Wor and also obtain an easement from the City to allow the air encroachments. The easement shall subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division and the City Attorney. 3. The applicant shall submit a report by a qualified arborist evaluating the potential for constructi damage to trees on the park property. The report shall make recommendations to mitigate impal to, or replace any trees that may be damaged. The report shall be shall be reviewed and approved the Development Services Division prior to approval of the building permit. 4. The applicant shall submit revised landscape plans incorporating recommendations from the arbor evaluation and staff recommendations for species type on the park property. The plan shall reviewed and approved by the Development Services Project Manager prior to approval of the buildi permit. 5. Prior to building permit approval, the applicant shall record a new sewer easement that includes a hl harmless agreement indemnifying the City from all liability arising from maintenance to the sev main. The easement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Servic Division and the City Attorney. 6. Prior to building permit approval, a 15-foot trail easement shall be recorded along the pedestri connection on the north end of the property. The easement shall be subject to the review a approval of the Development Services Division and the City Attorney. Plans for the pedestri connection shall be revised to show the connection to the trail, subject to the review and approval the Development Services Division. EXPIRATION PERIODS: Site Plan Approvals(SA): Two (2)years from the final approval (signature) date. 95 Burnett HEXRPT.doc CO CO N y 1 • of •..yr� � •y v o 1 Y 51 � U FETT AVENUE SOUTH o _ — — — ...Inn — — — — — vr 1 R NM ORS 40"10• `""°W BUILDING ENTRANCE FROM tacemrnu N p.). ., 1 :1 k E SOUTH nw.urc MALE n.unuar co 6 n�J� .. qet" star!�g�L' s�iiF� 4iA �2��UL6� _: _:_>___,..:.:_:._._:_:. 'v17,._ iii - _:__::.: — ---nay :.:.::...:. ..1?l'1 4.# . (it lir ." 0 � • 1 0 f ` as,Iskvoed,14 � + j 1()•, )/4144ta. 4 �— . . r• is 1: Cp °� r :I' _,. I i ::� % I to IIP pi: nantan (t... / :__.. -_,--__-......red;__.:.:--. ;:.. . / .= :.,:; . ct,0 .:....:.„. :..::......._.,... .. na;�a,e„gzMrkar#:.:..... ...:.::,.:.::...... ..:.:,......:.: .. ...... ..:,.::..:.......... 4:.:...e.::. :.:..>...::..:..::.:,.......:._..:.-,.:. ........:,.:.::,.:,.::.,:...,.:,,.::.. . .. .. ...... ... ....,...,..,:... .... —'.;.. ....a....._. 4I�/�//I . �//%�I��:-:�::._.::__ ;:_:..�,...:--._:::.-:.::.. .,__,._:.::..::___-.;._-"..:;-£"::_:::.� to UM rtM. rnr:Ja're7 SISSY •,.v Tw.'.^r�-,�•••+•m• �" FOR PARK DEVELOPMENT SEE LANDSCAPE PEDESTRIAN MALL CONNECTIONil I FROM BURNETT AVENUE TO PARK • . '• .u. ;.. rare urmuer� • • �`/4.4.z i '' • worwen • ° 1 !:( Q weeuew • TIII ' 1 was vuar • BURNETT PLACE SOUTH QSITE PLAN F scale L7e 0 Project Teen 00 r pEn womta:PG N war er.PG MOW It KS O umoar.,S.pm Q Site Plan O Approval N I A1.1 0 LOGAN AVENUE SOUTH '20OOi ./ — — • • - AMVALT FAMOUS _W TRELLIS WOODEN TRELLIS gI ...T eaWBLES - stucco _ Si CD PETAL COPE. NAN,SEND. m 2 .ECM. VWYL SOSO CEDAR TRAM • u TRWI METAL d1AIORAR VWTI.IIYOCW EL IF11e' r7 .IOEOOW //\ F ------iv1v0SE—. o O -- AM 10lLT 111( EL BiDI'� 6 e �� ■ ■ ■ 1111 IIIII7 ■ ■ . �- Fl llAl' -:�.' - t,t,�, II�FaF■II%= !I BFai II/.... \IIr.aF■II/ Faalil II imm� ii ---- TCP.-LPTEL z rfir 1 _ _ ■.., life"10 ■■■ mill ■.■ _..r... ... (l"I. i� _ ■■■ g w CO �pr®7�7� --- - ICI_ _I -� __- _-_ ■.. _7_ I�_ -_- ITT.7 I=. I I..■. ,0&O.FLOOR EL.&LAY Y ALL®® e,EeL cworr = — _ _ _.I ., — _ — = w ie`ci ®ME _ ° _ ®® till Iia ® Illll �!1 ® Iiil hit ha ill n 1 _ -/ == - --- _ _ _ _ _ 11;11 = _ -� ^ E ............ .... .. � �� -__ -_-�� � � � � I ■. a �-FLOOR:irk).* I � 6 ""1 —r� v O .... .... .... ... l II Ni o -III] ❑Ot, , .� .;SSO❑ 0❑ i i t,t,t.l 00000 00000 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ . ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ I ❑ ------.--L`eaL'-o ou to _ �� I q EtJ m !e t �I a I � wi" I e � 13I+� �u I -Ci r " x l.: i1z1 r��I I ° I3j ® � 71-4 ® i FM 7F(� IFZ (% -.' :IE; enB( � — .� F 0,0-, aVL0 \ (1) TUCCO 0 \ exnFaC�colt.00c, `-LAD wex19,T:GRADEMETAL OlwmlwL ALUM eTOR[FccIT WROOUEDOOR EI0.R FADE GONG BLOCKS BUILDING"A" AL�`EF" rn •.o EAST ELEVATION oSCALE 3/3Y.r-®' Y 1 rn R }I AeFN.iLT eNWBLee aenLUT BNtalel @1 STUCCO 9,IICCO 11 VWTL SONS VNt'L BOWO V WTL WOOL METAL LOPEAS V WTL WOOL AL.SPAR' METAL BOEtl .tYAR TRH �• TOE LEVEL------— METAL OILR DRAIL 1' t� A'A ROOF NEWT EL[SST 1 - < IIIIIIIIIIIIIIL LIUI' -WW1 ... \II_. ` \II II_ W1II%.... ----- \I�1-11- �----- �---� =Wa.1 _ 1111 II 1 Ai.... ® m TGl.LEVEL , .■■I _ - III !ii1 ■.■ 1u!"'Iii1- ■■■- ■■7 ■■■ In n ■•■ f _ -- - 11T11 _____ =I==�= === =I=- =1 = === === = = _I=�_ —� IIII === Q Taelm-nKroR eL.un'�__,,...-._._.• _� .._ _ _ _�_ _ -- S 3 O L ARM LE`EL ............ ........ METAL ME N I _ '!!!! - IIIII !ill Pill I�il Pill 11i1 "■ !!i " ® IIIII ® m ® = 1 II / BIO-FLOQt EL.eODB• I - _,E,_ --- - _�_ =r=-�_ _�= f=�= ___ -�_ _I—_ _ W LerEc T s s °' .., iiii Ial Gil iilii ■ . iiii iii_iii iiii ii ii ii iiiii __ - F 0 TGPt2LAe EL.alfl' - ❑ W--i ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ A ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ^ __- 11 ❑ ----- ❑ ■ O �-—-- ❑ - ❑ Project Team F ii G3 ;'' 9r 3T 3] C[' F t Y J ,C3C'Sj -i l r.m I 1 1 z".. lfj fS . s r Ct ■ Ftarn o¢u CNI ,E:ReTD 1 } IM u, .lf l {Ii l 11 . /I i■ :� [ ,�� ■I_.I ,■ , ;�` 1 ,■ I■ } ■81 ■ I i iiiiil■iiiiiiN��ii�i IIIII— �� ,R PC 4-Partly--- 1 Y.WMRY.4 ''�I'L(�J 11\''M1',t, ARM MR.FS O METAL FRAME AL"'L FACE WILL IIBBJOYVDOOR / IXRfe MIS KS /// METAL GUARDRAIL SMiR FACE CM11 Q • Lt@ a 000TWS GRADE J STEEL BEK]ART FENCE STEEL OEOdLTT ELATE 111TE.Coib 1!.10A SPLIT FACE GNLL- o BUILDING"A" 511e Plan . Approval I WEST ELEVATION A5.1 • tT SCALE 3A3'.I'-0' . 0 F 2000■ . 41 y jl WOODEN TRELLIS _- WOODEN TRELLIS STUCCO eN>GLEe AERIAL,00pIPGLEe STUCCO eTur�e VINYL MEG WEL omen 1 1@T/L cDM wm emAR CtDdRT01 `� 4CL Blwi',..... �''L e�OW IETaL CCM.GUARDRAIL vNTL merow m d FOO IA?GYT EL S]31• �-� I[ rii �L04,17, ---I--- I , I .m-- \=11-■.■IIY \II-■.■II%= \_II■. II% --° :`.:.IV - -•-• -,III A a r TOP.LEVEL - J.-111 -I I ' 111 iiif iil ■■■_ ii!' ii� ■■■ 11.1'1 ■■_ ��� " A — = I��■': CO : IIM 8 F"' TDeOB-FLGors ELiBAI'j m =1=1= =1== === =1_I= -1--1= _ _ = -_�= - 1== _ z w ievEL IT - ,•, - ENN - STEEL CANOPY 11.1 r„ ��1 _al 11;11 id _id iiii � ' in %i_ _ '. .: ®® on 1 m __ 77 7 --- 11;11 1111 q - _ TDe11B-FLOOR ELSBDi -�=_ =I=1= -1=1_ -1=-1� --- _I_1_ _I=1- I i a_ TOP.TyLdB EL Att• 0 0 ..........• ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 00000 00000 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 00000 00000 I� ❑ L ❑❑r m • Fill i MI ffl 1519 FPI F R I" TUTTi i f1l fil -® �,��--- s..a s� �Y f 1 Asa - — — � EL.]B]T' ®1�'1 {L{.�®.pp Aid l LV4 1;4R, fr.} [Y..+ 6.t�3 w_tu{ FC.J M�� wI' Z N.°e 1:. - .0 r t—, -.�0 LL..{t.el 10 IL.i r, \Si ® ® 0 -b-E%IDTYI6RA� [S] f.1 al l ,%,-. 1.,11.L1l,.■^il �,.r IA- C,S '.Fli Ir.rl ' ..{Lr : I .J,7 '_IC' Lily jI4,J I[_,Li m m © \ -- y ,p,)t- 1 ,- V,TS-A.YFLO�CEY L- ...Or FROM GRADE 01ULL0 COPET AL \\ SPLIT Nis CRC.BLDIXB— 15 ALCM.STOREFRONT BRIDGBDOC ___/ SETLL 4E0]FITY MICE 0 SPLIT FALL COIL BLOC. BUILDING"B" rn o EAST ELEVATION Ln SCALE 3i32..r-e' O I a N AerNALT SWI GLEE 1 d erurr wirL atom1 rreTAL COPE. PETALeIOPG EDOD TRELLB I TORIDG5 LEVEL EL r1--4 PETAL GUARDRAIL _ 1 A>4 RD0 HEIGuf EL eel• Ln 1..... i —�� — CL TU_� a � I \_I.. IV._. ii�" 11:::II l \II:::II7.... i..Igri:Il7.... ii ..■ 1 I ------ .TDP.LEE. -g1g I L�J 11 ... ■ ■ E=igl■ r ___ __ ® =1= __= II II = 1__ D�-FLDLR eLIZA s 1 ® ® I ® - — - --- wLEVEL Z >� o FMETAALL FRAME RAG =.-- 11�11 min 11.. iil ii1 ill :: __ 0 11 1111 -,1 ii �b _ 0I = 11111 I==1= =f==1= =1_.. =f.._ =1-- =f_= _ To .rLGDR EL_MEV 1 R]LEVEt % �� 11 ■■■ II "u" MI fii hi f i�f�Pi i i 199 Fri f i F F1cc cy, ❑ .. . ❑ m-mm 0000000001 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ r ❑ ❑ TDvTALAe EL.A.1 F _ ❑ R1 LcVE � O ■ I d ■I±s .S 'E ili7 I 1 ■!« F I, —z .,L rdu It girl MI ,li d(t Minna � -1.1 L IGLINk.IkY i` O . -AFL_ Project Team O (11�I iiiim�i�i���i1614 ii��=1 sl1r� '�■( }l-=-`Il !t Ic i .■. it I �r I.. sl s 9+1€5 1 �, � f ■f 1. rs n F+ E_L>B>• O = L. J1tI,T.T 1`,— Y—�' G ? JtL�em E .6a LiGRme io[n ROOM RE eL>ll' P04010.RE N ALM 6TORE1RON1 UGIDOYYDDO0 i - ' - G<RAGC LevEL / J LSD@ O 06151 G.BADE \ Iota.OIaRDRAIL MAW SPLIT RACE MG GPUl WED B:PC STEEL MGM,OdLE SPLIT SECURITY CC .BLO OWED MI Es O er]R FACE LONG BLm a OM Ds*14 tom o BUILDING"B" Plan cov WEST ELEVATION Approval I • - U1 SCALE9P.i'3 -D' A5.2 1 j MWDANGLESALT DANGLES j W. W. DNDDD WOO OWIR a VttTL UM m 2 Y@TAL tlIAlIDRAR VElYL UMW [L Dui' CEDAR DUI .TL eTN' ` N-) 8 rafCDGC LEVEL \�1 \ —______ DIUD[f ` / �// 1 •4EL TLI' .� ❑ ❑ ❑ ��1 1 V ,, ❑ O s e EL.l1Al' 1 C �______ ....I�� z TOP.LEKL �--��--� ° IIMI ° ® ° 1DP.LEVEL — O __ abb-fLDDR EL AAA.�JJ Ta&D•fLODR ELieAI' '_- 4gLEKL --- — pp■■■■ 1III��LIII}}'�'111,,fCCf� 1 Y W LEKL ❑ uliiiiii ❑ in ❑ 'gooill^I® roan 211DALODR EL MOW =L:' ::1m 4T001A-RODR EL.MOW _ _ _ bT — L W LEKL �, _ �r. W LEVEL �� Vj,- — L_ �J cc N ',N.A.,EL AIM , L i T .1111111 — ,PoLEK.FLALI' 0 .•M.. ❑ 11ItI ❑❑ ❑11 '1❑ ❑Q at C ❑ r.P_�I W W LEKL III �� ° � - -mL -- ® OP.EL,ell' ` �JP.EL eLl' —-y CAlnlID LEKL G�11D LCKI /� efRR EAD GAR CCI EbOtiANDn d Ra0Pa0ED GRAD! w Q 0000 rfffLLGARK$DCOR BUILDING"B" METAL maw, WEST ELEVATION LO CT) -8 c NORTH ELEVATION &SECTION THRU COMMON AREA SCALE 3137•4-0• O SCALE:3nr.r-D• . Lt i M ! 01 EL Dui' y EL eu✓ 40 Tvnmc! l!i C T p S Z. < EL 11Al' 1 ALA �} EL TU E \YII1'6LL�1I�1Y/,/ 1 1 ��V���...����'���I•••���C�•�'��'I''��1^^^/////////��' y fiTOP.LE `S ° ° I ° — :; : P. `TDBIID•0.0OR C4 iM' ® lIIIIII EL.BMI 1!,[S11�J,1�JJL II,E_J1,�',L7!` }} Rl LEKL -- ❑ A ` ® ® ® , , ® f H - O D ® ° u II II'II ®® A ® ab0-BOOR EL eOb o TOedef-RDOR EL m.. .Rt LEKL ®�L nw..1.-1f1L-''''''(r� Cn Rr LEKL ❑ ® ° — ❑ ®® ®v®' ® 1 I ® .■� ® ® r_A J F _ _ CI. ° ° CO au 1❑❑ OP.IOL.AD EL.ALT 0 _ —=_ — Project.Team Q tOP.TPLAD EL�tT' W LCKL _ , Q re I.D.I. RUED 1.01A KS ram int Fs I ATO L EKL MOM:■R Q .cRarm LEKL ex�erwc NO rrmr•oeEo GRADE wmov.e.IS.DOS O NBUILDING"A" Slto Plan I SOUTH ELEVATION &SECTION THRU COMMON AREA EAST ELEVATION �a� WALE:,n,'.r.0 A5.3 SCALE:�nr.r-m 0 a 1 gl aERUALr aoriEZI I I e urn g Lc1NEFEV WS VENT7 vonl OINO O.WDEN dil VDRL GONG V E: pmrr DG � o rl•GaR rRDI i m V vrm� „ILLslurro LsorA± 0 9 A, .� C in in ZW � :§) mL -al1.- � I N MMQ " NITEL G S 0L e• T' I o a ® ® ❑ {� ® ® ❑ x WseE1, I 2z 1-4 V UWE 1 EX DT.GRAS I FR.EL riI' � M $WFl/f!LEVEL ) I 1 1' O �!IA1 4 LE!0[barb GRAVE J 1�.1 BUILDING"A" a _e o NORHT ELEVATION in SCALE:3/37•.r.0• o g g I a TcsDGGE EL Ola.• cp ice, �li,....... i : il.' I--- - n n in ,h 3. e ❑ i �..nn. EL lvr 7 i 1,,m_o_ v"N`Frivri rii TOpID FLOGR EL•a. a * l@ma o ® ® ❑ ❑ ® ® I bLEVEL x = L Q _OL10-FLOGR EL lIAD' • Qg 1 o vas I-- W LEVEL� < TOr.TDAO eL.11' F 6� ------ioLe�EL 0 1 rf..FDT ETGL C s, Project Team o0 -—Gn Fw'a�,�* ROW Mil ES N LEE ward prd GRAVE / "EEC S EEC PG PG o BUILDING"B" .Et KS WDE:DolOor lL NCO o SOUTH ELEVATION 51Ee Plan o Approval I SCALE 3/32..i•m' - Ul A5.4 \ I I [ -p SEE-SHEET Li":2" _ FORMARDSCAPE ---- __________.________. ---- .1_ \\,.... ..._ . ... • • 7,.'kji7.-77/--t"'' 'Ini-',2* -0,:"'.,:- -Ln.4117.:ZI '41 '..:7171-.‘'' ,L—...,7:7,ars"A-a---,7--T47.5g§.0312-\---, .. .„.. F..-%'7"--77—rp-IVY:7- -----"-.7ASE,c7.-- -7.--•-•7' `•••,:•--,_,'"--Ail...,:„ '7.---'-''''Iet---,s'7T-''':C.->7-'':?--7-7-,1720=,...--,11.7.-----— 1 , •,• .-•-- ,..„....,..0.............s.....,..,....„,-,„,.?.......„....„..„......q.—......,-.1,-..,...,,,..,,,,,-..„,,....-%;--.. ..- ..,, ,,,..--........,_-.....-r..k E , ,' =- - ',....-'.--..,, .'...-'•:,‘,..'..,'":'-eNA'''.ee'i,.-....miA ''''''''''''''''''''''' '',...Ma-e,•'''''''-''!':,!,o E.M,,Ph•-li'," ,(0..e••••••0".......1.4%Re-q/a n):,:?6,,,,`KN,',3,-.-;i7,,,:":-:,:;;.:.'1-.3/F*:-.4-ifgg,',-,..4',..',:p.. .:':",,f,Prke-6,,,,3:',:,,,,,,n;';'..'11::4-l'i4.:6‘:::(e..lf.-.,..; : ..,_ ''.'....,'::,4:;l:'e.f.:ig:.5,2::C:Z,P,f.t14:.(;,,,,:.,-,..',/i.:Fk.i.21'n';':'(e_:t,-3:::;,,.',?-"A.i.c:.:*:,,,.:. ':.,gi:(, ',':',,i''''2-1?c'.•:'''.e',fiq:':''':'nV'-,`3•'''. .''-:'.i''''.-J,V, .1.•%-i5t2:::::':'":"4.44'`' 41-0 i'.1,Ti:: "''''O':'('''';',';',::AF',4AS,-,4(.4;'...gt, e74.-:?- :Vi'lq'r':=(%'::.•?e?-',':('-':',1'1:,..n;F:1 --(:',;,"::..4;f,4',4;,,,;,.,i-.,:,.,,,,e;egr;,::0.7:4',.,:!.3,,,;,;:_.; . , • '-'••''''',4.'..Z'C'tf i'''(;(...'S'..71'..i:/;§':. :5,-c-:,-''..-':irl?,:::itre'2';'"--';',,,/".''''P':':'';':''''',,r,,,:•,'Ac,,. -,:,,c1- ;1:•.,.;,t,q•Lil,-::,gi, -fiiiii:-.7.77.-i..0, ,e..-44.,:..i...Itz. -0.:0•„ts4,,,,,,,, ,,-.4.4.4„:„:4:;‘,-pg,4",-di.,,,,,,:,,...,z, v.....,,,,A,...s.,•..::::::%.,,,,j,.;.,,,,,,,3,,,i,...,,,:•:••;,-;;....r.,;,s, ,`,",,--IIIII I -•••--•-•.-,... tim.;!-•1.,........:,:fae.,r.!7,-.-1,•::_,,,,--4,,,,--,4.,.. .-.•,,s,,,z,..E.,:ty.:-Awkzalq..,-F,14.'..i.,- ..,..v,-,-,36,..-,,,...;.,.,i.,;,,,,z,...-•,„...,;:,,,,,..1„,„1.i..1,,4,, ,,..,,,,:......zil.e; ......................................................................6i*S`i*AliteZi!,:,,tv-,L.)-:,70,_ .7,.::',.4,!;,t,;;.:... .:-..:. 111 I 1 1 I '?;E:''', ''''..:*-,'-''..kl'ig-'4,1-t.,?;', ..,Z,V;"."1!--4;r.'',.'"'.5`.,'i'7--;.-,W:Ik7i'!;:4:'',.,i.: 13,,ig,:::.7: ..gi;:,:ii::;"-!F•r,.q.:4;•,*.VaA'fdigh.,7. 0 „WO;.--,1:Z.C.f4':WkR,,...,..t.t:g0.4:.-,,i4,7i,v,- ,i,,, ,,,•,,,,,i4:4-„,,;,y;,,a,,,,,,dosiz,:q.,,..gc:;-,:.,..1-7,f:::,^1. ,.-.',.,,`,-.`.2:;",:?,`.t ,1 „. 111`111"14.''''''i'' ''-‘::'::1•''''''VrVi-tj.j...,-iit.i.b:6":1-:;11Zi-Ri'l.q.1.":1:-5.04'0A3.JA:0":::',::!:1-L''''4.7:i!S.:-'-'0,,,-,',:i.:;:i-,:.-.:',,v;.--,,,,-.4i-74:,114 ! DIN ', 0111111 ,._• .:„,., .„.,..„,,,,,,,,,„,,,,,,,,,,q„,„.....,,,,.„....,„,„„„,.:„..„....„,...„.,,,,,,,,,,,:„.„,„.„..,,„,„.;„..„.„,„,.,, , ...,.. ...„,..„,,, „„,.„,,,,,,,„.,,,„,,,,..,.,.;., .„,, ;.p..,,,,,•,,,,,,,,,,..,„,,s.,,,,,„„:„,,, „„,. .;,- . ,,,,..„,„..„,.-,,,„„.........,x.„.„.,,:„...,,,,..„:„.....„;,..__,..;.;‘,..„.„.,„,,:„...„.„.„,.......„.,,,„,„,„,„,:....„.„:„.„.„,..,,,:„.„ ....,__,,, ,..„-...„,,,,,,,,,„„,...,:•.„,..„,„,.-.„,,,-„,..,;.„.„,,,,,,,,,„„„,,,..„,„.:,,,,,,,,....;„,„t,...4..:,..,„..,.„..s..,.„........„:4; ,, 5'--n 4:,:',1(..-Zii.'i,'•rni,,T4',.'f(:.0.,.-.(ts,FS6'/:`,,A!F:si,:en,P,',!....,,'.1-%?7(''',•:-.M,..,.:',3:6",.!`f:',(%::-t.'(''‘Ei.-",::':,:::•A .(‘' .',• • 7,l'Iait,.W..r, AnA"I'lfli;`',ilk l*:"23-iii%"-i'Mirit m,;.1"2""'"r'l_ ."Itlik./„„_,L,,e „,tL,fif4aWig:„Xt,",,,,,,,ftftf..., ";.Ii„,,,Z,I.7,,,tt,:tt,l.',;Slit,:ii„Oa'll;p3iti,.,t,i.,:15:::,;z7r,,,,t,,,,,,II-ilv,"..-4::,,,,,I,La;:ilt, 11' l lic74 . ,la ,, . .,..trILYR"Zt.,:' .10-; ..,,,1i,i'" miii,.,aigkr"ft, trtS.r. ,ilig,VI,i.k".,t,t,-2,:llg,aa:Ili ,f3P4iiriZ,Vii,,i,k2:iti.,.,i4f.,..,:-"0.i'alall,ll'A'?".";.:tigt.- '4,-;il,„ ,i5lit .'.,"4-lisz'l,',4'iY-"",,:•,::".7i. :,,,.:-,•:1'.':,43;',,‘,.;:W,43:7A1,-.1-`4.,,,:,-5-.„,W,?*"it.'?4".1;,:.%.-.-.4,;*.1,:-VO;',-: '....3.'YiRill,..4.494M'..Trks,'..,1",....tj'c,., ...;'-'-',,,;1.S.3.:','11 0 ..- gr,!..4_,„=„A-K. ....,,,:z•ita,,F;,:::::',:'-' C.',1A,,,,:X.'''-1..,..-. sf+ -.'.'.',e,'4Rqt,eai:;.;0t:#- 'J.*tt,*V<''‘''.iVi'c.f,-ltX,,,fs:zY,',-.--474,'ft;.4,pl'f,':::',.'y4,','-,.,,- *r'..,I,-:;t-j.-j:•:.;',4;q:,:,,,../...";!0"..,"l0;":`'.4 :-,-,4 >. ;,,-,---,-,%',E,64.414,,OW:,...,i.r.'-.:05;76,,-:;',Ar':',.7f5,-i-";:-i`A,ili",i4:"1"/:-:-.f-eAQ.: -51--tr-`2'..e-ptik-1-?4:-.',?;,,-:',A'!:,',: ',-. -.4. ,0,,s.,t•-,', --444`;',:hke.kie,,,o,',, ,,w,.,,%..q,,,.i,i,;1,-I'ithl,=4,; ':4,,IT,,47X,-,f,tir,,,,,:tz,^^-..Z4.;V:ti$,Wi,,,i,..)4;1,,,c,!,;;;„,$,,,,.,4.;,1,,i.,;;.4 . . , ,., ,.,..0'144,,(-.;.41,. C 411:4,6,;;;4-N,',q..,r,-.gel'a44";,4gA'44'-iti,f,,P47. 7.7-1, 4—' C -, , 6':'13.,3.!;:.",:11.11 ... .,A!,,,,,,,;-!,,zr.,,i,*,?-4,7„.„,,,,..,45,4?-0,, ,,,,-,:„...qt ,..• - " -1*.;:-.17,c.,,,,,-,L.,, ,,;,, ,,,,,,,,,-.„.,. _,_, +-, c . •-•. .p.o , • •:1.pc4 hb.....,..,i. • :,,,,iisepAa,w....torra, 2... A- ''::aaiij:'O:Aa:aiirf''',0*'''s:C: '",140**,,4.k,!.5:c:,....'ski?..(tiiidtcgrii$,*1011/10 1 • ..... 101l7• 40111V404 liv it.,..0:::•.-';--::•:-VO.,-V6Waig,•, ,,,w„ 0 ., ., ••,I 140 • 1 Wo ( ,,)_...0••••:...........__,,i0 ______ ...... ._. . ‘.. _.......,_ _, ____. .. ..,.....,_ .--... . ..„,„v.,, ...._ . _•• • . w . .. 0 -,- • ."'- .C' AREA - in ••WINO LAIN ,.... ------_.--.—. - , (7) co E., • _. & , • ..._ P3 - --.--.-... Cl. 0 ....--—_....— _.._ • (/) CI- FL . Key datg. ANL.ne,,,EI-IEDUI_E SIze Comments ^ I Scientific Name Trees, 3'71 Incense Coder 00 6-1'ht Japanese enoebell nep 110•cal Rad Sunset Menlo 00 1 in..1 vine maple 00 2 1/2'•oal 101—e-L‘j&VZO 1 Coluonare Norway Maple 00 1 WV cal 1111:lit Acer:C'L?:::21°''HITionolI"7:.'n.o•6:711.07na.re. . 61'"-b' o ph,, ,,,,,,,,,,Fab.. Pablo Rnclodandron _ DO---254.g.:-...J-L:,--24., •IftV - anciron ora V Anatole. Dora Arnatrole OPheeloociondrOn 00 : 5 68,0," Nandina doneetlas'Coe/peat,' Compact Heavenly Bamboo 00 gal Pont E,0, , 30.epr 10° Prunua laureceraann'Otto Lug 1- inan' Otto ,1R.,Lilts's, (3 Rhododendron'Wei& Unique Weeelodendron 00 30.Wimp 00 coal coot Compact tamed Eoorraro•Eq.mgwo orate.Compacta. eam 36. ao shone E- 1 °W. T,prine,Bouquet'Vficurruor ED 'burl.,Elm. gu so 36. Poenard Pam ae PolOstlimlsot vrtunlitao as Mow Evemennen FluceJaloarrn 00 UP 0,0.0 Vacolniten ovetum 00 24* ProjettTeam Te .,)PerlKonoclaous talcutooldala goo :,.,1 PROJECT MGR,1,5 41 Deolon Two Four/Two qx, . nnt7. Groutudeoven — As raq'cl 1 pal cope ---1 - II.UN or ant WWI,VI:ono Tondscapa architecture•site development•Irrigation plc i g V.h.'`E'Al r, Enna•onal color planta A•retold 2 gal cact 24.oo.cawny DATE,10*.r E.3000 VI,',.I-- hkenarocallle 50P. 0 Aa rectel 2 al nom 24*oz.Peal Gaultier.ehallon 24°oo. 4203 tart Avo.NE Suite 102 8aPeose,WA 98007 EJIRS 881-2428 Ar0t0et0ph4loe ova oral KinIchlnetce. An roo'd 2 E4A1 Rao Dtvel An real d 2 ost cork 2.1......- Design Littlolear Partumelne Opmell Yin.minor 1 ,Podded Lawn • , LANDSCAPE PLAN-STREET FRONTAGE AND PARKWAY o11 SCALA: .9 1.c 20' Existing Trees - Sae Trees PreaeNatIon Plan LI5 ror Spoon.and 5. 2 Sloe L ' • ' ` . r--" - p �� All.i' ' r- a rt-,r. . - 1 i i,y r' a J Q u v ®i5— - "jL 14 }r 4;% ,' o itii �!.II�aGGiof--110k i �,... WU AA®MN191 —. mm�iva #Tr ...... +r O 4-1 7.r,r7-vYM9 W U Y.)..r:,1:74..Tw c V 10 UPPER PATIO-PLANTINGS AND HARDSCAPE '` '-,: a 4 SCALE: lir-1. ' L� '-_''-- I •_; Y N d i t.r g PAW PATT9N r��. M. 'r+ . ; RSv� ,7 p 3 - • z e2mH F • 4 HARDSCAPE LAYOUT-PEDESTRIAN LINKAGE Project Team PRO=we:es SCALE 1/r-1' ROW usxrtcr: ORM e,.ON Design Two Four/Two Six. Ina a°®r'" II-fi landscape architecture••site development••irrigation planning w¢:x•-.�e.•.rags I �za5 1/ea Ma.NO.SWa wz FlammwA YpWI (au)eAl—zee Design Development • L1.2 1 200019 • • • FAO PHS ,G`5F:(..IS. ''3.'G5) . . z I,5 CFAs':t•_ I.I,O!') �.. , 0 i. a - ---- - - ---- - - - -- v"i CO Bum i i 6, / a _ c ::n t _ EN V't ' K[t P EXIST FIRE HYDT ---.I %`M`mn5c CO CFI W/I 300.OF BLDG ;'�I = i '_.'•. EXI51t FIRE HYDT �I .. •"' -_a .m to 5o ry N ''.JW/I 1$0'OF BLDG 1 :- c• ' �a v,,- / '.^ �L'(1) %C TAPPING SLEE'E(FL) S.2 S. I ,♦"c0.: ! '' o,l, (I) TAPPING VALVE(FL%MJ) _In in.tom= 1 S•`'o)�10 -:di / to' ro (I)GONE THRUST BLOC11 C • o•.o . .-,p,o-< I ti�ii , `0.. (1)315 LF DI CL-52 I (1)5%Ti TAPPIN y E�(FC' 1 l; II?'a')°.i°"K i ''/ - - I ¢I .0 I EAST FIRE HYDT 4-7 C r m x _ (1)6- TAPPING`f3((ruF11- I i 1 ': ' 1 nS.i�„5wg i < DUST/FIRE BLDG - -. - I W/I 300'OF BLDG y I '-' 777"' W/I 1 0.OF SLOG - _ I (1)conc rHRusr B1;cIcK , 1 !�i�...;, ._._..�-• ,.,.�.s,........_,...Y.....,, - - CC (1)35 LF DI'CGdi211 I ' -Br t _- -;- - r Ts,--1--_ _: ..- - - _-- (�:1 I • I ....� � ���' - um; w��_ ' I : . t_ l-._...,`• ...1`N--'__../ , f -- -`----uo.';', , x .:,<•....ca- sY / MSTFIRE HYDT , ' \V j_�.P,D._.,....-,................;Y.�I.._....:.... .. Sv—....._,..yl,.._........j.,.0 „r...�.... _ _ �.,.....,.it.....Sll'- -_� «.°gt._...,»,_,�.pS ,. ,-,- Jg _ so--- }. FJ�....'.. . _ _._"--OO / 12 1, PVC 15 TAP IMET 10 IAEfRS-$EWER)9 I - I I W/I 150'OF BLDG_=7., \-! - _ Ss__._..—_/ _ �'--- C I PLUG EX 15 T i ••S 60x IE=8.7 METRO APP-OVAL REOD J-------�-'---` 108'METRO-QlSER. - '. _ 1 - .._ u J t$I �c�.a���E>or��IllLa�ilm i�r� i'� =- :1' __ I CO BI • ON S RV�O & 1 i°' ■ ����� ----- i i,'Ovl• f If �.6'COMBINATON SERVICE& ------ -f x'_`-'—'J'4 � � OR METED IN P E CON �I I I, 'W 1 I I I r--- t - ,\''METER IN PRECAST CONC PIT N I:DDRLTIM1ST W/CCCIf11 �I/}IJ v�1.-- I I F ;�C�OORD INSTAllAT10N W CRY d G-i:iL,_r7.,OB,Bif._B REMOVE EXIST SS OR , I I IRS�y II 48' I I y l / :r C:''`n;:T"..,i •--t l ABANDON PER CEOIECH N'I6'I PJC•'N '\ I �I 36.2 \V J. %SERJICp:,pR)`n.P``7■ ,`YIEe jS.tBO 11,' CC W I i $ `'�'' i:, - I F-- i _. ,5,1 _.E E51J,: 31 t 11.. 15 SANA}NT I 1 "h ct%', °D PSE] g 4. --- {'" _ U _ � -..,. -------/---'ry ..,•.\ 0 a�B: .___ z I - _ I+i I ^�r- ,�:► -EXf TING 3J ONG - 7�.EML/D;'T)PJ--\ 1 1 i u vim:; ',.__ - L _.1 1,, -- I, I I :WAWA v x jt k *11 ;n¢>c,a.• �. j., Z+, J�- -:'.- +i 3- '7C 7'J'46"E' zy� 5 f - 1 r>iC+ . 4 _ J .. eE�oaND 6B 'L - A-- i A - _- f Y- , -'T4 ING _ - ,`' r-'80 - PVC Tom,._._. LF 15 + IS 3 i ----�-- • �-�--y- A10 KB q4 d� q��R _-__ss _.._-/9a 68 LF 15 PVC ` FNGWEERS.WG E m v s :j NO LWFEONn STREET.ant Rig S �• tea;, • i \•I SEATTLE•NWmGToF.aaI014101 c I :_ I DON Sat-1100•FAX 0001061-0100 F. .._ / 1 r__. .__._.__.�-_._.__..r.-ES. ztP_.____ AKB JOB No.200l32 bn ^§w Intl _ Project Term ¢ ffi g£�ffin�o�~ ' e6n4cr uca:sr --cu3 �paw� �� C.✓JIL.!•e 0N11ELT A411NEIF. v,n _ zi6...._.,_o_a w—— oaANxn:sr/cNc -f�ielElfi�p� CMCIOD Sh ST .• • S70NAL E� ,1r/SJaa OATE0.¢m0v 13.2[00 WATER AND SANITARY SEWER PLAN _'. _._.__— CALE MM ._..__._i._._._ ._____.-.._._. .--___—____._-._._ 5 !• 1� a-a-al Permit __..__.0--------- Submittal 06', apT5;_.-' GRAPHIC SCALE a. p _. - • . ___- Irfl Tear) . , i,9'39-Ar_"SCH4,10FP"i,-,,O; 11.16-so n 200019 ....._ v ., I L ( P ) ,,, ' / -OD CO OD - CO . . , . ,, ---IL iv -- , ... ,, .. , , ........„.., ..c I N ,. „ \ \ , ./ co, ....„...,......_ . =_, , co co , \ \\ -ce \ !-1.IP)// \ I H ( P ) p ))'''X„1 \, NN R-8\ R13 --.- . Airport Way . -1.-- ce -, \,,,, .00111,mom.. .........• , -1 I I 1 IC A 1 I 1 . 1 C 1C111 ' ,r. _1 , :.., '‘N C A -----,-„,- , : i ! 7-.. , ! cA, , . .,. .N, ,.. \, - ,. , ,.. ., . ' : 'Rr-I 8 CI P- . RM-U ' - 's‘ / ;---. , • , ; ::SZ11 .001n! St. _2' ' r , - (i- -CD pi-- ,,..,. .. ,- .......____ •-•ti X ! ' ni7:157, R- 3 Pril - -1' 0A __.-- - ,, ••- •% V --_—_, - - ,1:1 , ..... I---•- -.....-- • .-i----: . u C_D Rm...u ---- --.33 _.J 0. 1.._‘ s.1 _. RM- - s\" C D ( P ) 5vr .... , „ ,A__\__._.. H - .. , _ ' - Rlyt-U te__; 9) , - • tac I! d A -- ------- C D CD—S 2nd St. __f-- _ _ \_ _ _. .................„ S 2nd St. IT --I—I - --------- '--- CD ----- ' ' r—i _ .1... CD ---------,--- i 1 c4 ,7_:„ , ., - _ crict, icrol -- -- —14 —---, -. . . CD CD ----T • , -r" Cni "‹ I er-rt- I , ,--- --- S 3rd St.! -r . 1 %...,: i - n A , L --. -• 3} d ' P1. "----78" —7 . - ------'4 ----.---- ! S r : CD _.._ CD ei) CD '1" CD CD CD S- o 1 CD jj..mmarair 4.mal.... CA CD CD CD n can 1 C-D CD CD CD • .,..,• o 1: CDI5 ,-.s .. }Al \--)\• .:,,i1,_-------: ' '-'':7.:: 1'-i-1--t i io I "=—I ':13 -: i \\7:- „..s ." riri Fin Fin n r-777-).1 r--71 1 . 1 ', ,------- _ I - --- . .__ STAFF City of Renton REPORT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations BACKGROUND REPORT DATE March 6, 2001 Project Name 95 Burnett Applicant PDSK Properties, Inc. 621 Pacific Avenue#300 Tacoma,WA 98402 File Number LUA-00-171, SA-H, ECF Project Manager Steve Taylor Project Description The proposed project will include the demolition of Lande Feed Mill and several other small commercial buildings located onsite to construct a four-story apartment structure containing 118 dwelling units. The density for the project is approximately 91 dwelling units/acre. The first floor will contain structured parking with 164 stalls. Vehicular access is via Burnett Avenue South. The property is zoned Center Downtown (CD). The proposed project will include thinning and replanting trees in the adjacent park and the addition of a small plaza to create pedestrian connections to Burnett Avenue South and to the building lobby area. Additionally, the project will remove two underground storage tanks. One tank is located onsite; the other is located just off-site on park property. Project Location 73, 75, 77 and 95 Burnett Avenue South Exist Bldg. Area gsf All existing buildings will be Proposed New Bldg. 152,021-sf removed Area gsf Site Area 56,557-sf(1.298 acres) Total Building 152,021-sf Area gsf CRITERIA: 1. BUILDING SITING AND DESIGN i. Pedestrian Building Entries—Minimum Standards:Require buildings to be oriented to the street with clear connections to the sidewalk. A primary entrance of each building shall be located on the façade facing the street. The main entry to the proposed apartment building faces Burnett Avenue South, the only street fronting the site. The building entry is located off a central courtyard that serves as both pedestrian and vehicle access. The entry is marked with a canopy and prominent architectural treatment to the elevations at that location. Raised pedestrian walkways provide clear connection to the sidewalk. Entry to the parking garages is located off to the sides of the central courtyard. This moves the garage entries off of Burnett and makes them less visible. Guidelines focus on providing clear architectural entrance features with lobbies, canopies and ornamental lighting. Also encouraged are pedestrian pathways,plazas and landscaping. Staff has worked with the applicant to further enhance the project entry. The applicant has agreed to demarcate the pedestrian walkways with a raised and colored paving pattern that will also alert drivers to slow down. Other proposed changes include adding arbors with plantings over the garage entries and making the canopy over the entrance larger. The applicant should submit plans showing the proposed architectural details for staff review and approval. ii. Transition to Surrounding Development — Minimum Standards: Careful siting and design treatment is necessary to achieve a compatible transition where new buildings differ from surrounding development in City of Renton P/B/PW Department U Center Design Overlay Regulations 95 BURNETT - LUA-00-171,SA-H,ECF REPORT OF MARCH 6, 2001 Page 2 of 5 terms of building height, bulk and scale. The following design elements shall be considered to promote a transition to surrounding uses: • Setbacks at the side or rear of a building may be increased in order to reduce the bulk and scale of larger building and so that sunlight reaches adjacent yards; • Building proportions, including step backs on upper levels; • Building articulation to divide a larger architectural element into smaller pieces; • Rooflines,pitches and shapes. The proposed development holds the street edge unlike current buildings, which have parking lots between them and the street edge. To the South of the site are a garage and a house containing a business. These properties are zoned CD and are likely to redevelop in the future. To the North is multi- family retirement housing similar in scale to the proposed project. The proposed building is 4 stories, with a maximum building height of 50 feet. Breaking the building into two distinct buildings above the first level reduces the overall bulk of the project. Levels 2 through 4 are also set back from the street and further modulated with recesses for decks. The bulk of the first level is modulated between alternate setbacks from the sidewalk of 2 to 4 feet and broken by the expanse of the auto court. Although the proposed building would be taller than surrounding buildings to the south and west, the immediate area is zoned CD and likely to change as incremental redevelopment occurs. Comprehensive Plan policies encourage taller buildings and more intensive use of properties in the downtown core. The CD zoning allows for a 95-foot height limit. The proposal complies with the minimum standards of this criterion. No guidelines are suggested. 2. PARKING, ACCESS, CIRCULATION i. Location of Parking— Minimum Standards: No parking shall be located between a building and front property line or street side of a corner lot ii. Design of Surface Parking—Minimum Standards: Parking lot lighting shall not spill onto adjacent of abutting properties. N. Structure/Garage Parking— No minimum standard. Guidelines state that parking entries should not subordinate pedestrian entries and should not dominate the streetscape. Parking garages should be architecturally compatible with the residential portion of the building. The parking structure should be enclosed or screened through any combination of walls, decorative grilles, or trellis work with landscaping. Garage parking should be secure. The street side of parking garages in the CD zone should incorporate retail or service commercial facilities. There is no surface parking proposed. All parking is contained within the building. Entry to the parking garages is from a central courtyard off of Burnett Avenue South. The street-facing façade of the garage is faced in split face concrete block, an attractive material that is compatible with the residential portion of the building. Landscaping is also proposed to soften the bulk of the parking garage. The garage will be controlled with electronic entries. There are highly visible garage portals facing Burnett Ave. S. and the applicant has indicated that the openings would be infilled with a screen pattern and window mullions that echo the residential building but no material samples were submitted. Decorative treatment of the garage openings is essential along Burnett Ave. S. for compatibility with the residential portion of the building above and to maintain a pedestrian friendly streetscape. The applicant should submit a product sample of the screening for the garage openings for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permits. The proposal complies with the minimum standards of this criterion. City of Renton P/B/PW Department U Center Design Overlay Regulations 95 BURNETT LUA-00-171,SA-H,ECF REPORT OF MARCH 6,2001 Page 3 of 5 3. LANDSCAPING/RECREATION/COMMON SPACE i. Minimum Standard — Attached housing developments of 10 or more dwelling units shall provide a minimum area of common space or recreation area equal to 50 square feet per unit. The common space area should be aggregated to provide usable area(s) for residents. The project consists of 118 dwelling units, which would require 5,900 square feet of common space. The proposal includes 5,000 square feet of common area and a 900 square feet credit is requested for public park improvements. Park improvements consist of a decorative plaza containing a raised sitting wall, landscaping, and pedestrian connections. The common areas include a 1,000 square foot exercise room, an 800 square foot common gathering space at the building lobby, which will contain a fireplace and seating furniture. There are two landscaped courtyards; one is 1,500-sq. ft. located above the lobby area and the other 1,700-sq. ft., on the north side of the building. All of the common areas would be open and accessible to all residents. The courtyard areas would utilize landscape planters and trellises to create a separation between private outdoor areas of the first level units and the common courtyards. In addition, there are a number of other smaller linear landscaped areas along the perimeter of the building and around the central courtyard, which also contains a small water feature. Staff recommends approval of the open space credit. The park is located directly adjacent to the building and the proposed plaza and landscape improvements create a more useful urban open space available not only to residents of the project, but to the public at large. RMC 4-3-100C allows the Director of Development Services the authority to modify the minimum standards of the Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations provided the development as a whole meets the intent of the regulations. The proposed common areas comply with the minimum standard and guidelines of this criterion. 4. BUILDING ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN L Building Character and Massing - Minimum Standard— All building facades shall include modulation or articulation at intervals of no more than 40 feet. The proposed building utilizes a variety of modulation and articulation. At the street level the building is generally setback 2 feet from the property line with step backs of 2 feet at intervals no longer than 40 feet. A variety of types of textured CMU will be used on the on the street front elevations. Walls along Burnett - are broken up with openings, which contain decorative screen material. In addition the auto court near the center of the project breaks down the length of the building. Above the street level the building is modulated such that there are no elevations longer than 40 feet on the street sides. The proposal complies with the minimum standard and guidelines of this criterion. ii. Building Rooflines - Minimum Standard — Building rooflines should be varied by emphasizing dormers, chimneys, stepped roofs, gables, prominent cornice or fascia, or be broken or articulated to add visual interest to the building. Both flat and sloped roofs are used in the project to break down the scale of the buildings and create the feeling that the project is a city block made up of several different buildings. In addition hip roof forms of various sizes break up the sloped portions of the roof on this building. The proposal complies with this criterion. Building Materials- No Minimum Standard—Guidelines state that exterior finishes should add visual intere: and detail and be made of material that is durable, high quality and easily maintained. iii. The base of the building is faced with durable materials mainly consisting of concrete block. The upper portions of the building use "lighter" appearing materials, vinyl siding, stucco and metal siding. The proposed building materials meet the guidelines of this criterion. , City of Renton P/B/PW Department U Center Design Overlay Regulations 95 BURNETT LUA-00-171,SA-H,ECF REPORT OF MARCH 6,2001 Page 4 of 5 Decision The modification to the minimum recreation/open space standard is allowed. The 95 Burnett Development, File No. LUA-00-171, SA-H, ECF, is determined to comply with the minimum standards and guidelines of the Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations, RMC 4-3-100 D, E, F & G subject to the following condition. 1. The applicant shall submit a product sample of the screening for the garage openings/portals for staff approval. Decorative treatment of the garage openings is essential along Burnett Ave. S. for compatibility with the residential portion of the building above and to maintain a pedestrian friendly streetscape. Development Services Division staff shall approve the screening prior to issuance of building permits. 2. Prior to approval of the building permit, the applicant shall indicate the proposed architectural details for the entry area on the building plans for staff review and approval. EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: March 6, 2001 SIGNATURE: !Val u}c4 /fie o i Neil Watts,Development Services Director date TRANSMITTED this 6th day of March, 2001 to the applicant and owner: PDSK Properties, Inc. 621 Pacific Avenue#300 Tacoma,WA 98402 Philip M. Lande 9037 38th Avenue SW Seattle,WA 98126 Rudy& Beverly Starkovich 810 N. Riverside Drive Renton,WA 98055 TRANSMITTED this 6th day of March, 2001 to Parties of Record. Aaron McLuen 117 Burnett Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 Kirk King, DDS 66 Williams Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 City of Renton P/B/PW Department U Center Design Overlay Regulations 95 BURNETT LUA-00-171,SA-H,ECF REPORT OF MARCH 6,2001 Page 5 of 5 Artice Slemko 14415 12th SW Seattle,WA 98166 TRANSMITTED this 6th day of March, 2001 to the following: Larry Meckling, Building Official Larry Rude, Fire Prevention Jennifer Henning, Development Services Division Kayren Kittrick, Public Works Division Lawrence J.Warren, City Attorney South County Journal Land Use Decision Appeal Process Appeals of Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM March 20, 2001. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process/may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. CO CO N d z Ik__— I •1 ANUESOUTH` ' •flevlr _ _ 'N _ yy A �a1r '"` BUILDINQENTRANCEFROM -r— — N 8 r¢ •,a. I , SOUTH MINA d' i!rnTiyl��'T�';• ,.tss.+ � • ,GI}'p8[W - �- • - awrr�ruM N !!Liyllis �II^.A i1nV,•-+.s -�� `a'd [5. -'1i21Ti s4 �Fd��L'TS.K ; - - - cn M (�/ ,�� . �a+�wauo z ____ p k y' ;a � tffiiSESCS+i�I lR' iQ��i;41i�urS�4 • i • •�• II'M/ �,��M .yY hi F;6' iW7s;.ya: t',�� a, [,- P e- , r, . 1,1,' 'f'WIP,2226niiiiAns ,,aa :vi .�.. ' • \' 'II i f ! si €a' / cur .,, ♦�veM r�t't naiJ6Si p¢,. t iTi" ,,v e��-' ....34........ +i�' '4 'ft .i ;.+', �"' i .,„A r r~ 1•,*r it/p r f 'd, y <twat, sf a 'rkf ;_; �+ /�/ z.w1;�, � /��QBi///� �F f:M 1� aaJ'�� �,.ya ���1` ks V ' a.... /, I// !µ, c qt' 1 fa ,S.or o i3iA;Jrrr;44. . --,. / 'Tr }mod Atel / 1 e 0 jig ,., \ lid 1,�C/� �`._.'4f�' % / �I*. �I er.ti O ... Mari' ► • �.r• 4 fr ct d (A. o, FX i•..f .av . dR r. , l es , T q'u p/ // ipl plummier A� r1 mr ` %�/ 'r"w, a :,: _. � .rr ���� a`.xl 'F iF,., iM ° // }P�rJ.y4 ;s "� � .`r.> /,:, Nd• /; � ,..,,k' a8•ir_ ..-.-..Ya.�.oat. ... .:.r�Wa� .y ....+p'. rb, ..c / ....v+ /I .. �,,,,eWlb. -'S"1, -..J' :.viz' r.•.7— -...,x .._. - . • oet- �xav% Ara::N;''X� .�'. ;��►�//%///.'rs :/� t,,f, `A3t"irr. �si ::.� r. e•Fv,.,,,,, ,Rai• ;,*;,F .�,;Y ?;��3`'+ c v ... ....,•.,... �+ wrxat /.__. .... _ i//./r�I au^hv'rC ' S� $'j <A.^ x:: 'i�'s,.''f9,kt9...�. w,do":s jL_r I ,+ r.�w,w•. NAY.. _ :,�• star ••T• FOR PANG DEVELOR7ENt 6EE LAND6CAPE T.I +�^° PEDESTRIAN MALL CONNECTION . • . .,• FROMBURNETTAVENUETOPARK •' a• m trorw •.•• Lrau.w II- Y r tiJx O uor.... E y Q wa KN ram-.. q� ' I410VALt `r- lL 6URNETT PLACE SOUTH y IP O O SITE PLAN O Ida .CALL ProJael TenCDrmm■m II N noca wncm PO/ oAr m PO O or®mo O N Ella PUn Approval � A1.1 o- /, LOGAN AVENUE SOUTH — . woos • I I I (0 1 i CO A0*4.131.1NOLD N NM Milli 1000011160011 .1. rt;6.006 / TO66=0 MIL CORO VNTL 60Na g 12 .— .sow, NUL NOM ali.4111.11 • 01 tltrl I1TAL 6.16/01461 VL 11110061 1011111111111111111111111111.7- ..AN6.16006_.L.062,11.7"11, 0 ii, ..- Ill, 1111111.11\, --.A11111.1 -- 111121.1.1m.- —N—N—N I-— L -7.f-2 47 .14".97 - —..r: II Wi:1117-:--'---7111111WW11117,- --...MInaraiir7.-- -- LJ , II id Emu IN iiiriiii um mail Ho En girlili NEN lilt Ohm mom -17- a=ii- m1=5 ..--.--E-.- ... Imo E= -11=-7.- ..-;.-------_----- --3= F.-.=.= Y . I 1 MEIM MIIIII 1111-W-114 p II G ___ 121:n iiild la- Oi d =f_. oll OH •- .EIN.._EN._r . 1 - -i ii ii il El iiiii iii ii iii Mil lalit,,i lull id Ril _ . op — oop A ,•••••••0 00000 01:1000 00000 00000 ODD alj 00000 0 - : 11 11 , ' VI im.,:,-•,,,,i NUJ tEL. MI ', „,, : , . . , ... in C, NC;_.e,r II, e'IN''''','IN C,. In,1,dil 1',N- ......--,_''' '__IL. _J.-L. ''7,_;'.',,.,Mill, I /144=1 1-1.1.1-11\1,1 II 1 III 1, 1 11111 II- HIHE111111111111lltii (0YLLIT O MM.0.1ANOWNL 0 N - ' .11.11,2317° ILIT WI 00611.N.000 \•••.-1..■C 0 ID0111131101.1 f24 ALA016T00660NT 00060000 6PLIT PAC6 0:011.1000 BUILDING"A" rum oneaerr men in cr) 2 o-- EAST ELEVATION 8 SCAM 31324-0' Lt rn o - - . 1 4:14;c..1,ALT liaoLl6 T il IMICCO I 1 11 VIM MOOS !SUL CORA% 7 VI MIL 6010 M - MI L10000 :44 ___ j .01.6:......... ______ MAL 0.1.00,41. 1.11 A'•, 20,1t.."XULjP24-.” ...._, - ,UI - ...m011.11.00.- _..11111111111111..- -.011111111111111111... ......011111111111111D.0..... , ......... tleSL2 141106 aI ) IL'$ ::.—.."1,,,,p.g.i. : .....4 ”.iL TIMM — --7Frlir- ----= \=1.,1- -:-Iii7,,.- --. i litwor maIN iir 111 Num iiit iid Et mi 010 iiiiii sir' 1 i filii ii oil ni 0 .* ,E,Rob,..,v .ji......EA/1__.., ...---- - 111- -15-•=:1= it-E1-.7 ---;;,---:-= :'----4-.: ...1=5. .-.------:.-:- E_-----:7-.' ----E.--; z="I=1--IE -.1'.=-15 a -,-- X 131 _ _ 0 . . ) 1 , =, ...,,............ .., nim •• • 1 I no um Hill Ill nil Mifi IKHG 01, Iii II m oll m a m Fat%MANI MTN.0.16/0NAL El 4 1 I 1. I 1 -_a12. tt.--- 1E. --1---1 :7:=-'-'12 --= .' = aiiii, liFeV ii Mt iiiiri il Is liEFi9 _ iiiglaT1 ifiliii Fii -FT FR 519 PI En . W --- ElIII- - F- F:3 1.- -.-.m----=.1 0 CI u 0 • 0 u ID 0 0 0 0 0 CI 0 u u 0 0 0 . • • 1. • ------ o --- 0 0 ....-7.--...------r--- Project Taan 0 1 r' :: ::NIS 111,I;Id/1,171111 111'.1f,lk.BIB.Ill-III III S:I,-It'1,IIIMMIIIIIIINCIIN yloillikig,.,"[Ilvin ..7,-.7,7. _„... 42j111-21.&,. — rANN 0 PC :VA..Pat2 ft LI. \ ' ..... . IM :IL.uttra1600041•61 WM0 0 KS Par.0*IL NCO Lle 0.IMMO pawn...J 6011•60.118TT mom 601L 6101INTT OMR .. ...... 0° MUT PACS Ma N BUILDING"A" • Us Pim Approval I WEST ELEVATION .• • C/) CT IgtALL)42'04' A5.1 c, , 2.... • INTO e.eoawt�LLu 0I AMWLI r.nLl. AMdLT WOOL. CO � � '� KTAL CO/.n .TKCC 0 N ' VIOL WOW PIRA UA VNTL IONS �' IL..,.t.y: Do I�TAL COAeoe.L6 ®Miww . �Awnm.Kwti_wr'--- __— mi_m i ,............... „............ g I �`= ---I-- F. .--I '.,I ... :If■■.I% \`II■■■II%= �:II■■■Il -- - - - --- Ell- _-_ to..LIVIL lap* r Iliir'7n1 ■II I In!'"!iil fa ■ ifl ■u■ ir'7ii1�' iII a 1 j - - Illll --- --- --= 11 11 = '___ - Ill Il�li�i 1111 F= T,,:t. .. eL..,A,� = i===1 = __1= =1_1= __ =1=1= =I_I_ ___ __- =f_i= =I=1= __ — — w I ;NMI I En 1i11 Ili' Eiji 1n1 Irii1_ lijj iiiii 1��1 In1_ ®® 1 wii - iiIui1 ®®� ,a.,..L.�.a». = f--_I _-1o0l❑ a 1❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑ 00000 00000II 000008. a. rnnTAw...,• 0 0 ��- 00000 ❑ . b�� ❑ 11 11 �■I■ ■ 11-11 ■ ■ 00 4 IC)i E i n. - : : :h'I_I1164.4:i.i. :I�I I:I.1.:1:.• 1'.I:iI.Iti:If.1-IIa`.I`Ii:I;.1:1:1>I:=1:I:;6I:I=iw1a I:1iiI!'I {i:iI ,;:I,I .I:hr.1'1:■ II III I14 I. I!!I to `��1M6.T�ODR�vEI / LIB Cr MOTU SWAM ` �t�= r�� o SKIT MCIOMG etaeuPC) . r- BUILDING"B" in \ EAST ELEVATION Ln .0.4LIO„3.1•4.e• 0 Lt • O • A..flLT bena.t LT4Cf0 I y WTI..m,nIt: Y rintAL CO'.n WTI.MOW C 11.21..M2, .WO T.., V I--OACCC[LIvb 4111L—�.• —TLTAL CWIm.AL -.111111111102.-.. a `III■..IIr -- `III■..II%== -1I■..II%:... • `:II•--■IV: - ... �•� 1 -1-----nor u'a 1 .`A 1 I 11 NM! ■ 1 11 Iiu! iii ■■� ■■E ® no Inl7ii1 ■■y ir' 'lI 11111 �ngi! Jiff rn _- =1=1= =1_I= - _ _ f_1 I -.I I I = 1.- ,eA�.PLoe..L...� o ® r;AEI IYL ® ® � ® Lill II !1® 1111 lid Iin H11 u1 -�i 11�11 l I�!_= tv.u..�eoe 11 11 ■!1 ® 1....1i. i Flfl "- ... :.. "'I f l lis b:.M� . I cs) ❑ ::�= ❑ Ye = ❑ D • ■ D ❑ ❑ ❑ D ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ , ❑ I=_= ❑ ,e,.,aAe.iaL� F 0 0 — N LIHL p ■ (� ■ ' ■ I■. u.■ ■I,M; I ,I, 4: ■ 7: s^I� h 1& �IS.i,:■I? t nl I,I� :.�I „I■h' \cs imm in s`._ e�r.�,• RoJael Tedm o i111111,-",,TT 1111!tl\".,,� IIIIIIIL. IIIIIIII!�11allal I..1■1µa,..■1 1 1■h Ir i■I fh.I'il-r:r■i I,I■ :I=� I,I■I 1k Ci =r1�■u41,_I■L{ i.l.a:aNl l=1■�•I:�.,■.:L.I■I:�I :- - - I IYF a,;;~s, TEM NUM ch......L.NL� NOW MOM Si Aun.T c...T a L.oaw.wl--/ Di O MOM"OMAD! IMTAL CJA CAL Y,+i 10 PS SPLIT.ICI CrW o .ri6 NO,eRCATS PM MMtTT PPPcial OR=m Si o BUILDING"B" a'„0 lit „2. N WEST ELEVATION Approval A5.2 G • sN a tri z]� Cr, G N /TMwRLLLT YYIYt. �t�,( .. 1lTLLOWIORAL Ne'LYBOOY [ 8 i? ,� CtDM TYT }[f RnH' c/1 .L nw r l �I a TGl1i0.t / �`_ r�� ,o�R.awl. u •.A v , o a a Z vdt•-- ' TAMD•rLOOR IL.u1' cjim /L au,•:;:: ® __,_. '-•_ ®® ® putt - i 4 T 1;1:001[L►!N' I I• ❑ ""II.' 0 ❑ ®IO L.TSLOOR R.NOV G Ille ®®®� �•�•, _ p 1111 — �■ •�A LLNL iir, Lli — TOr.TILY[4 a1T• i.E■� c§ f� ToraxAe n.WIT „DIED > � OU 01 _ ®p L..tL !!! ❑ ❑ ❑(F: !1�/�W.y�1+ CH al 1� rI./L.IT,' It I'1 vi `], Li_9 n .�, aearo uru ■ ® ® II_ 1 lhRnr0 07 oao�m Lau NN M MLR FACE CM DORM IIO f110ML.D ORAet W Q OVIIMILW WPM Tn.tIJ 1114.14 DOOR Pe'""""'"'®"' WEST ELEVATION BUILDING"B" rn o NORTH ELEVATION &SECTION THRU COMMON AREA "c Mr•r•® QSCALE aaC'.M.e' ,N ,,, • LS rn i 1 tL.TI✓ �n in 9 TC1lIDOt Q R,u.T. 1 .T�f•1I 71�.�1V7J, �y eL n..:: : fl •. � - ®®`III 1 r • ��� A TOr.LlNL ❑ I I ❑ l W ❑ ®®. _�_ ii ® 1• N.LI pri. 11�1 ' ® III ® y • Q :W.77/LIMY "I _RI uKL n gppg Q�' Q TGIYe•rLDOR BL►►OY ❑ ® ❑ II II"" ❑ ®® -�•,- -_I•I ® —� TaMbJLOOR RYl.� ® ® ® ® f = Tr � N _; e / N L.NL p0) ' ° El ° aici,,,,= = ° MEI -Do - 12 — Q TOr.TALIe 6L IV — TOr.TAIAS/L AL,' ❑ ❑ ❑ I 0 00 ❑❑ 4 tiuKL �--- Rolect Team Q b T L®TSL `k( N� aT O PP./4ILT _ •❑+ f I® "`� � arI,PL.nil..., Lire •1. �• . POW NORM IO Owl IR II aewL. u n A oluulo LLv.L IIOMO AID CID ORAOt O.O¢a S,RI O u Q ,GOs•I.r U.IMO B Plan o lle BUILDING"A" 81. I SOUTH ELEVATION &SECTION THRU COMMON AREA EAST ELEVATION OfpA5.3 val • In Q1 SCALE Mr.t.e' SCALE 1n7'.1'•e' 20002 • I:\Dwgs-2000\200019\200019.—A5.dv 4, 03/05/01 08:34:10 PM, KENT, 14286 • ipi ;' Big at' IV ;; N~ IF I I 'I 1" I ,10,g I ; I I It It I I,IQmer. ■ l i li �: 1 a I I I W a■ !Pm I!Illi!■11 Z W ■I■ III!II■ AI Eli ■ II!B;■ [EN ■ p f■ inns u� 0 C I II!ill■ IIII!I■■ , 5 0 C I aim Illlli■ E11l : o N '1\ g a7 r' =v � . o o a -1Z a 0 • 1,, • mz o m� I . N?% Q OD a I r < . �� g ism umi ■ !II II■ iiyi■i S LI1I1 IIIIII'■ 1111■ ❑■ fillli■ Illi,!■■ 0 rm. 11111111 0 ■ IIIIII!■ IIIIIII■] z a Zl s - a" ® Na` II ' I I ® ® �� I 4[1 °■IL•UIII!II� I 11 ❑ I tf I 1 t 1 I I Io I. I I • 1 4 1 1 1 1 O ils 1 It I/ I 51 f • P DATE BY DF9OPtDl 4:- 4.a 95 Burnett ^�a ...Es � B 11 n T°°11"-}1 I AnhIteets iue I WOO NortinpWah Sib') (Im*asn PDSK Prq�rtieS tic Renton,Wasti�gton . - . • • t. I ..pp.:;-.....1..,A1!-:::.;.•et; \ - LT:2'FORIIARDSCAPE. _....... .._ ._ -- — •-----------• ----• •------•- ',Ali: .:4• •1 . i..•2• v•I,,itrak. <14,11.47:p• •••• •,4"0-..z.zsgvet)t..•••••;:sr.a,i,44.v.E,._,rxr,‘&two-74. ,g,,, .• -.. - ...,,,,,,,,, ......„,..„,44,............ ;V., • 444,4-4.44,3%\..,4.4. .t4WVA 4.k'..*......., sP1:4114,P aLt.,•\4190..F.I.B ..... ..."'''...-----'-."...- -....... 1 ':.:,X ''. ''''-4 1°.' • ... * .'TZ'2•.'4V-:".17 ..4.'"'"'"....'" . '''.1.1:1'1!••"14-111....''. ..;,,,,,:."1104 .:•,---::::,-,-2Z,...-4.•kIVA -•il :-'".......- ,,•:;:•111;,,,mv.......,..,.,•,.....,,,,t,p,..., - , . - ._ --•-• •• l'..1.4,-4..lp'7.4''3,....?:,,/,,.1. .4.1.14.4.0.,2 ..,',..."q/...'..1 4.',,.',:;'1714.....,,,,`4.4,h14‘..044,44....cii . .',4W43,_ ft./.0:7,-.T..t..1...,:p.,:-.....4G 44-44 ..',44,2,7.74,.4:5.. - ,,.:......,,e 3..v,.: .3,4,,,....., ,,,..r.,•••••• •••••••:-..„. ,_.., • i -."" ...-"7" f.,,.," ' '!.,'X"tr*:;:gEit-ilr.'4.ea/P- :f,•4'. .V::A%t,s'zf:•., % ' 4,icr3ti -;:..-.s..-.,,z•-• -•-k's 4.,„1,•,,\,.. ...,.. ....-,';447, . .,,g,{, ,••.,„wi,f,-,v.,*.:1".4444,2,,,• :41.4.tc,,,y,•,•••-4, ,,,,." ,/,......•4 .41 .7 r- ,„..,.,, 0--....,--.k.,,,-....-vsi.lig,...-.w.:. ,„,,„,.,- ,,,,,- •..1,,,,t;., ,,,.....sy.....v.,.., .0,4,..,,,,,,,..,.„ ".4,4/. '44.1-44g4A''':44, 4! .,'.";:" ...,4,...,:e.„:„,,,k,•:,-,,x.spL,,, ,t,,,,,,,,t.4.,:iy g .,. fo ..i.-.„,,.,.•,t,..,,to*. .?"vt:eiv,e.w.:,-,-. .,.71.,-.,,,,,K:ziffi,Acv, -,.,qif... ItRisiii. -,;,-.. ..-, .............. c. .1„, ,;,4., 4w.4: ,;..,• .,.34.1,..4.4.4k.,„„ ,4,3,.,.„,ip;4.,,„,-,,,.,;,,...,, 1 .,,- •)it,$txt . r"4,,,x,44,4*11,4*.....0141;44.100,,-9.-Aiiiiiit.1 _.-_,:111:-.: ..,,...... .44r4,..44m,(,,,,.,:...,. ,,,4,, --,-.,:,,i?- v.-.4.;, r.4: • I-tIt•et':•41.7,0'''.t.+' i. I 1..VV*01,iiiile:P,,.,..'v.s..Orq:',Ef.'7,et ,';_o't ,,zs"'S ' 1:..Z/44,,,. : -•;$4'f=i41`::t''..: i• 1 '-:' =K..; • ' --6*-"..- , ,,,,....-I 4,,,,, „.:,..r '44,-,plret,4,4,. .,,,.v.....1.4.".. ,-'"'t-"----- ;---: ,k,,,,i.,co w, ,itIgisior„te41.5.,. ...X .:„,-,.- ...-,4.02,',41..,A.L:i,„i„ *A-.0/0 .•*-z ..: -..ftv., - 4,,,"),44;4; 4 -t27.,,,:it., 13.),,,,...7 5,1441...4,,F.XOCK-3=..zre. w. ! '.-R.,-.‘%0 4,-, ' VF40:, 4;1:04V.i.,g.-;:14'''.4.'',3ii.. ,-,:::,P...4:44,,,47":k‘• •,4‘N 4,4r,17.1,sc, ---, , 1-‘,”,,ii.,;..,,,vt,,,I.,..k,'w..,', ' , '..y,,,wiczi,Frisek-,,c4.,;:v.,:,„;,:. 1/ g flPt '4i'Vii.' '144 -••4,....,_•'^w'''"Vfelifq$KAL174.1.1 'th?4.4 . ....' 1•••*:'..-1, • ... •.. $„p-s,:,,44.1:A.,;•••' •WL'-pc.A.f.'-•P..•.,. ..,V, .$4, .,''',...o.c?1,0.e,t,,,;;74i4.4-;,.: :-. .! --1,-- :0,.,, pt.:4-- Y-4 -.gt. 4,,i:=-0.,-2.0,-.4,4•-i<p•flig:i..„.:, .r,t• -- 1‘,A,;.'n, $-•,;-• .•L.•••,.:.4•:•': .I : ...•'''V,i''''•i C•9•A`l&e ;;;LA-1-0-],4*•%':- °,•-,1,1,#%,;(003 '.,•4 •'••;""- 'ev•I'4i:4••'441.•--;•:-.'''= '. lk.ge •iig,t- ,:-".i.,,,,.., t:...,......W,,,i,,, ;.-.4..,.,-• -....,,..w -,:l .'-',.e,.. .4.44-", -./i•i.'i...!zr...,-(-V. SA..9-,,:,..7,7..vg,.gdA .4i.,,)'',.ii••. g,,,a,..1.4z.vt ..,‘ •,-4-.,,•--44,„, • ;.,7..,*,i-13.,..'''‘, 1 J '., ',f Y-.40 ' , .;"''' .+44;;.20.:yi4,A., ..:,V,'' '4';':4:i.,,,;Tife,,.;44( VS-4.,..,',i''':'.41 :1': At -1.p.„.4%'/- -",•,.,,.Q.0,,b,---4.43 .-ti.!:-4 -..„tt.","1-g. ,..- '1..' '.•-wf.-4,it,S'A-m•S'il a pti. to- .:, ?5. • •••.4,V*.P411••?N.1'g'";71.,,ett" ...3.1•• ''''IV'''''.•••7!, .....,,,c'Ac.,it4.5',..V.,?.??#, ''..''., .5i'.ei • j,, -,,-'f;' .0.'1'.-• ,' . :-.&,,):•X.7-•fiT.,::414'4.•'.:'''•', ..;414.,44 7 -,Ax,":,..e• tt- ...,..W'4.,AN•5•4•P•••••.;/;`, , '.•• •-r .1,t,-,,' L't• . ."•CL* '°.•,'Ir'' zle42•Vt, *7" ,.1:Viy'i' •+;;.,k,L,J,,.,:,;• ,...,,lri:•,,, slt7V,..... •OF,, 'wp. •i,,:q.,.•.•11,4,,,,,,t:Pi;:..;• -! '''.0n, -...1 s:40: ,,,y,i,•'fr• • e•fs1V•'11Vc‘.fr.'', .•let A..,' V.!..14, 3/...1 1. ,6.‘'"V. CI•r•ti, , - ,..;,, g41-V '.... ••••,„vik;04 -• ,-,'5,1--r•'-', "` ,-•1-•."-',,..%;•„/•,' ••,?el'keliti.'yei,' v. - i'... " . . . ". '. '••••--vi-gfr-:7:z:Iiiiklihe.N'-ir"Aiwo: ii....;.,vri .:4,,V.:;:ukt,r4"s' ....vi,;:ii 1,,elibutiirgr4At,:ap,'•;#:"Ariii;;;t1:::imoirr‘1'4:ill;:'''s...._si7771_64"1"::Atilis......_';17:-'''.' 4''''.'''''.'''''''AILI•r''''-'1;:.-74.'-.;L..4.,..1.: ... , .... , 4.4 _ •• ,...._____ Ns 40.0. 1 . 0-ogisk- ioic,r,,,,e -ntotore.v,.460,,,i0 ,01---- OWelgell 0 •., •• .,_- .... .. . a.) ° t... \ , -,,,.o,4%4-7 , Irallr -0 4, Le. ' • .----- `.- *(0 A - • A -...... • . OTN3 LAIN/MA-) \ ,, 1%0 ••• ' IS \\ 4 .:, 4 (/ a ---....0 ----— 40 `...000011212 LAIN IPIA--- . • • ••--------•-•••---•-•---..----.—-- ..•••------ .5,5?;..,;•1;.v.,.'NI:.::••:.):::',': ( (0• ii Kay PLAI\IT SCHEDULE. . 0 Iraq. 641entIne Nano - on Nana Qty. elzer COmMonto 06..... CalocodrUll 42002205. 01005.•Cedar 00 ' • Or, iiP1 NAM(Japplea Japaiguf 0,470,4.11 of, I VP cal • ! ,. 111 .M1= .., OP7-4"Ji' ILF - II' *MN. : It :::,i-i.: alhodoclendron Vora Anatole' Oa*MAW*nrociodondrol oo 5 gal cant 10 sta, = pi, '14:13 Slandtna elonaattca . 2•1140avve 00500 00 0 gm'0.02 war-maws to 01 Laurel 00 0.5 DelP spr -. • ' 1 1 00 Qo 4.4224..m.tines t1242,a 115.414.41.141.2... 00 14. a•ohm., ' e- '1•,,,,, PokifitIO•u.muntim word P.m 00 10. ••siva" no0b0 V4loollqn owtoi rwearom440.190orns oe 0. es itto-a, out,Uminwnealloto tr142.02140•1.• 02, 244. Pn2JutTom . ... t lars I:rair2°::M.CDX•nt%to Uon Mani:4' MLR Val NI Gira.r.deovor: MOT A.M. 4105 1480 Is..NL 9.de 102 Dom.110 01027 525 001-245 EBED eueonal color plata* A.norpi 2 gal cent 0.4.IT Nu . ...gazzlj— iumroaallf•6pP, Ocitilia A+roa'a ;441 „r77,!1 ar.A.F.ma ahoilon Optal A.need 2 a.nem. 24°04, 0.41S4.4.44.4.le 12.40p, Arclostaplyloa wa oat ...• DellSn 512213r1.%.4- ooda.dua, . Develvment _ • .. _ LANDSCAPE PLAN-STREET FRONTAGE AND PARKWAY • j,i 1 ,1•::;1 ERWIN TrIbeS -800 Trois Preservation Plan LLS for bpostos Jnd eta A-4.1.• •,. WALL 1...11,1 . . .irg"' • . • . 200019 • I • . . . . . . . .. ..." . • • % 'T t•' 10i �, -1, c ' c r.: ' + . c • ..:;. V• a) i“ ''• dil ---- :: ,6,A74E g C CC tr,YF' v- - t __ _ r 1 .,,,,At I a} U t,� rar; LO 0h ur N a�( 4 UPPER PATIO-PLANTINGS AND HARDSCAPE [[i}��.. '' " e. •lftv I'ZZ( N . ..4,.' .. . .. . ... ....... ......i 7AYOMfl.tl•'�Z�1.� . ii, ,: 3 (- HARDSCAPE LAYOUT-PEDESTRIAN LINKAGE "°j�`T"m MOT KUb .CALK lir-r MCI AWW4C4 M-II R.to p T�1( p r/TW llc, �,n mac to m T:2pDnarcNlaetu,.•.:T1,1opm:tn..tIon plant am x.�.o.a woo at00 I4IM kn.I Ulla'Of Mew,WA tt007 (tl0)Ill WW1 Development • ' L1.2 200019 -FRO AP4Dr,E ui+•Ou N `-It111 COI:01 N W:l/C1' ! - I 1 :AO CO•Il v.: i'S.ill) '.CPU!,.ri,•�S;UO) , i . I i i i F vier s:•.- .01-)A-tea- a\f - }-- rpr_ __.______ __--__-_--__- -- 1. :. 1 1 I I cm4 / l Z. a i i o .1 m CN M COST f1AE RIDT Id V•-t3 .h I i 1 g N/I up.Of ROO i'� ....a.••.'q ,,^ u 1 i vIaPl "� c I C ;l /I Ijo•of BWC nn MDT I V v I IS til�b�,i i ^�' �((I Ix5 TOM 0 M'mS,m10 I �meab. -A.11e / Ve f1� TAPPDxI vu ttx(N�i t.e.•u.• tY , ys (l)CONO THROS-elDC1I rt•-^m , I y:�` 1 az� Uiv a (,) I�svga-s> t c i1 , )Sx5 TMAI � 1 1I I i '+ .'sv e'$ J �/�' _ .- -. _ i i 02ST ME MT ram+ ))) '•• _ i :L . _ ._. .- _ T 4. • _ -. • _ 9729:' ExIST FIRE WWII ,•., '•`�- p 6 sit- -^--ltr• - .• +w WA I00'Of B�0,:rzie \ 7. .�. YY-_-_-% _._ /12 `1 PYC q3J `�'__ •-- C •le -� /� - CCC111FFF 1:TM �wN' r^ PWO Ex tS W1i E.B MS1'•AP-OWL RE., . o --�`� _____..._ u tor IaETRO'Siw[A �.�lf.4i' _...`� ",`^ •-- -. t._.r---1 l 'S , .. '-- ^—sc.�_..�� eyt-'- 7•a. P i 1 f--�-• 1 y 1 IN PREOIST w/c AR' y y» - a KC 7Som• . /� REMOVE COST SS OR i LII �� `-` ISSMH .45 j `'.� ICoogp NmAUAnoH w/crrc 0. `V ' I ABANDON PER CEONCHIJ 'SLPw-e ' E.RMI.]S.R --- - - ''r O i $ '1 9• `� E.1• 15 • W j i cn ' \ a_ $ 0 f-- -' iE'-'IBA=��',J9 I i-p:' °' •k�• � .Q' -�_ N. ' M7c,•__ el I �'. 1Ill .F� --ai .106. p •"�eAT nnc eun_oiNc- �� 0 Tw) loom IC " - '�._ ��� MIME - N II �� ■ � �� u Ego I t1' r L ,I • Ir .. . ..9§t. •.,ti''.-Ir- - .: IE• •P-�� . _ T,„......�!r. - . t om- 1 g -n -._ Be if Is PVC - 3 - _ � IN wMU EN9mmr NNI*l 'R^ // ( 12 sums•=11MYKI1•IIRNIN R15j / i r, 114. _ S W___.. OIOIN4M•IUDIMINIIM i &2 v.R I =.. EF' --- �� RIOT 10O No.200u7 F I 4 I Ss E(1 o•4. m�4iegb U141R PNJcMTeun io e�uuyyu ' �• •d 9rYi' ._e dW .dd 'i• \ / fIlORG7 MAI>R {�5( ra7 �$j I. MOT AVM v i. ,RW41.,W WW WATER AND SANITARY SEWER PLAN _---•---rolsPo 6.0tOw.6.IAWm • NOTs1roe„n_„_.. f oHAPffic SCALE ...„-- 024' ?�alrrL w C3 0 f_ ? (L C)% 200019 • IL ( P )1/ -- --a- `\ \ \\\ %: -oo- -CO-.- -ao I' „ ,---:._-_-.:- ...: 'IL: . ..__. ____ _ lt -Al • , \\\ .4 :_i__: ____. : , -,, c, _ __,._, _ co co i_ IH ( P ) \ 1 _____ : 1 ,-- . \ .-- --.'„ . "---- Airport Way P R_g Tr-co - RA ! ! 1 ' lei 4111. i� ■ - it A _ 1 , ._1 _ _ \N \1 -1--j ► o .nG��A i � !--1,RfrE ' ' A- _ _ RM-U ` R 8/ --`1 .............] "',l1 , tr r i--..i CAD �` \1 co QA • _....--, 12, _._:,....„ V A Pire CD ( P ) -1_ 6 --- - ._ ---- ---. RM- ,__ ____ ___,,_ , ,,A8 • H — �� --- C D CD ------ -,- N D N i �-_ S 2nd St. --- ____J S 2nd S-t : w_. ! t___i / ___ � ,j _q ii — }=i0 _ CD -- .CD -- -0- -- 7 - I CD -.._ - 3rid StT c c, �` -._ - :T- -- N I i i ICDiIIp c4IIClICI I ZDQA13'rdTPl. ---o- ---- -1- ---- . — \ — CDI . ; CD r- / e -S- 4t _:_S Lam. -- --- -2- b.- • CA ED CD CD G CD CD =-.--- -- -- __ ) -- CD _CDcn ____ _... ___ __ = nn FT11=1 I"lf 'l tl r--r� r--=•.-.I rii- t$ 1 CITY ) RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator March 1,2001 • Mr: Kent Smutny Thomas Harkey Architects 13400 Northup Way#30 Bellevue, WA 98005 SUBJECT: 95 Burnett Project Project No. LUA-00-171,SA-H,ECF Dear Mr. Smutny: This•letter is to inform you that the comment and appeal periods:have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance.= Mitigated for the above-referenced • project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination'',:..The-applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures. As you have previously been advised, a Public Hearing will be held=by the Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, on March.13, 2001 at 9:00 AM to consider the proposed Site Plan. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at(425)430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, Steve Taylor"4/47/ Senior Planner cc: Mr. &Mrs. Starkovich/Owners Mr. Philip Lande/Owner Mr.Aaron McLuen/Parry of Record PDSK Properties, Inc. FINAL • 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055. [iI Thic..oncr....n�nc Gno%.en..nle.l...�.,n.,l ono%...... ................ •:" � — DEVELO IJl PLANNING. CITY 0 RENTON' ' CITE OF RENTON 1',. ,." Planning/Building/Public Works Department _ . ' ' FEB 2.7 2000 Gregg Zimmerman P.E.;Administrator" Jesse Tanner,Mayor . . RECEIVED: - January 15, 2001'1 OFFICE OF THE ' SUPERINTENDENT Superintendent's.Office" , ,Renton_School District #403• • • 300 SW 7th Street' - Renton, WA '9.8055-2307. ' . . Subject 95 Burnett Project _ • • Project:NO. LUA-00-171, SA-H,ECF : - . The'City of Renton Development"Services Division.has received an application:for proposed construction - of a four-story, 1.18-unit, apartment complex at 95 Burnett Avenue South. "For complete•details:of the- ,.project, a copy of the,'Notice of Application (NOA) is enclosed. ' . " ' , In order to process this application, the Development•Services-Division: needs to know which'Renton - Schools mould'be attended by children living in residences,at the location, indicated above. Would you ' please fill in the,-appropriate schools on the list below"and,return"this letter,to my attention, Development, „ '"Services Division,City of Renton,1055 South Grady Way, Renton; Washington 980.55. Elementary,School: Lakerdge • , Middle:School: Dimmitt High School:. Renton Will:the schools you have indicated.be.able to handle the impact of the additional students estimated to - ' , . 'come from-the proposed development? ' Yes s' '.No '' : Any Comments: ` Thank you for providing this important information: If you have an'yquestions' regarding this project . • • please contact me at"(425)430-7219. " Sincerely, _ . RS _40 _ Steve,Taylor. . _. , _ • _.. : ,• ... . .. JAN.:-23..2001 ,i ,1. . S enior Planner • Encl • „ CAPITAL PROJECTS • = = 1055 South Grady Way;Renton,Washington 98055 ' This paper contains 50'%recycled material,20%post consumer . F• CITY RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator February 7, 2001 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia,WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee(ERC)on February 6, 2001: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED 95 BURNETT PROJECT LUA-00-171,SA-H.ECF • The proposed project will include the demolition of Lande Feed Mill and several other small commercial buildings located onsite to construct a four-story apartment structure containing 118 dwelling units. The density for the project is approximately 91 dwelling units/acre. The first floor will contain structured parking with 164 stalls.,Vehicular access is via Burnett Avenue South. The property is zoned Center Downtown (cm:,,The proposed project will include thinning and replanting trees in the adjacent park and,the addition'•of a small plaza to create pedestrian connections to Burnett Avenue South and:to:the?building lobby area. Additionally, the project will remove two underground storage tanks. One tank is located onsite; the other is located just off- site on park property. Location: 73,75; 77.,and 95 Burnett Avenue South. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing On or before 5:00 PM February 26, 2001. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75:00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,;WA 98055... Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal • process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at(425)430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, j1)1)1-- Steve Taylor Senior Planner cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries • David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources WSDOT, Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) US Army Corp. of Engineers Agencyltr\ 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 This caner contains 50%receded material.20%cost consumer ,y �, CITY F RENTON eel , Planning/Building/Public Works Department J e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator February 7, 2001 Mr. Kent Smutny - Thomas Harkey Architects 13400 Northup Way#30 , Bellevue,WA 98005 SUBJECT: 95 Burnett Project Project No. LUA-00-171•,SA-H,ECF Dear Mr. Smutny: This letter is written on behalf of the Environrr"iental`'Review.Committee (ERC) and is to advise you that they have completed their review of.�the,subject,,project. The ERC, on February 6, 2001, issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with .Mitigation Measures. See the enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Appeals of the environmental.°determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM February 26, 2001. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00,;application fee with: Hearing • Examiner, City.of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way;:Renton;'..WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed.by City of Renton Municipal Code_Section 48-11,0 .; Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the CityClerk's Offce,(425)-430-6510. A Public Hearing will be held.°;by the Renton Hearing Examiner in:the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, on March 13, 2001 at,9:00 AM to consider the proposed Site Plan, The applicant or representative(s)of the applicant is.required to be present at the public hearing..A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing: ,If the environmental determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing:. The preceding information will assist you in planning for,implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose' to do so. . If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above,please call me at(425)430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, Steve Taylor Senior Planner . cc: Mr. &Mrs. Starkovich/Owners Mr. Philip Lande/Owner ' Mr.Aaron McLuen/Party of Record . PDSK Properties, Inc. Enclosure dnsmitr 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-00-171,SA-H,ECF APPLICANT: PDSK Properties, Inc. PROJECT NAME: 95 BURNETT PROJECT DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The proposed project will include the demolition of Lande Feed Mill and several other small commercial buildings located onsite to construct a four-story apartment structure containing 118 dwelling units. The density for the project is approximately 91 dwelling units/acre. The first floor will contain structured parking with 164 stalls. Vehicular access is via Burnett Avenue South. The property is zoned Center Downtown (CD). The proposed project Will include thinning and replanting trees in the adjacent park and the,addition,ofc-a.small plaza to create pedestrian connections to Burnett Avenue South and to the building lobby area. 'Additionally; the project will remove two underground storage tanks. One tank is.located onsite; the other:is"located just off-site on park property. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: " ..73, 75;77 and 95 Burnett Avenue South MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall comply with the;recommendations`,of the Geotech :Consultants Inc. May 20, 1999 geotechnical studwith�regard;:tosi y," tepreparationand building`foundations. 2. All underground storage°tanks associated;With the::;development shalr be removed and any soil contamination abated per Department.of_Ecology regulations;'Documentation of compliance with this mitigation measure byDOE."shall be submitted prior to building°permit approval. 3. All soil and water contamination identiffied,.in the two site";environmental studies conducted by Environmental Associates, Inc:nmust be abated.to:DOE=,standards: Documentation of compliance by DOE shall be submitted prior to,building.permit approval: 4. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire:Mitigation'Fee equal to$388 per new multi-family unit. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to issuance of a building permit. 5. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The required mitigation shall be paid prior to issuance of a building permit. 6. The applicant shall pay a Parks Department mitigation fee of $354.51 per new multi-family unit. The required mitigation fee shall be paid.prior to building permit approval. . 7. Prior to demolition of the Lande Feed Store,,the.applicant shall contract with a commercial pest control company to conduct and implement a rodent abatement program. This program shall be reviewed and approved by the Development Services Division and a report submitted by the pest control service verifying the program has been fully implemented prior to approval of the demolition permit. MITMEASURES I j CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-00-171,SA-H,ECF APPLICANT: PDSK Properties, Inc. PROJECT NAME: 95 BURNETT PROJECT DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The proposed project will include the demolition of Lande Feed Mill and several other small commercial buildings located onsite to construct a four-story apartment structure containing 118 dwelling units. The density for the project is approximately 91 dwelling units/acre. The first floor will contain"structured parking with 164 stalls. Vehicular access is via Burnett Avenue South., The property is zoned Center Downtown (CD). The proposed project will include thinning and replanting trees in the adjacent park and the addition"of°a.small plaza to create pedestrian connections..to Burnett Avenue"South and to the building, lobby area.` 'Additionally, the project will remove two underground storage tanks. One tank is located onsite the other iklocated just off-site on park property. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: • 73,}75,77 and 9513urnett=;Avenue South Advisory Notes to Applicant ` ": `rc The following notes are supplemental information:`provided`in conjunction', with the environmental determination. Because these:notes are-proviied'as:information;;only;Fthey are not subject to the appeal process for environnientaf determinations - .; FIRE • 1. The preliminary fire flow is:5250,GPM:= One hydrant is required with'in 150 feet of the structure and five additional hydrants are required within 300-:feet of the structure. 2. Separate plans and permits are required far The installation`of:fire alarm and sprinkler systems. POLICE 1. 109 calls for service are expected annually. Please contact Cindy Diggers of the Renton Police Department for construction phase and building safety related comments. • PLAN REVIEW WATER 1. The Water System Development Charge (SDC) will be $7,702.62 (the rate is $0.154 x 50,017 square feet of property). The fee is payable with the construction permit. A redevelopment credit will apply for existing water connections. 2. 8-inch and 24-inch water mains are located in Burnett Avenue South. Preliminary fire flow is 5250 GPM. To meet this requirement the project will require 6 hydrants. The two existing hydrants on the 8-inch main will be counted and 4 addition hydrants will need to be installed on the 24-inch main in Burnett. Existing hydrants shall be retrofitted with Stortz"quick disconnect' fittings: 95 Burnett Project LUA-00-171,SA-H,ECF Advisory Notes (continued) Page 2 of 3 3. Combination meters are not allowed. Separate connections and meters are required for domestic, irrigation and fire sprinkler services. 4. A separate utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation of the double detector check valve assembly for the fire sprinkler system, if the backflow device is to be installed inside the building. Applicant shall submit a copy of the mechanical plan showing location and installation. 5. Buildings that exceed 30 feet in height will require a backflow device to be installed on domestic water meters. SANITARY SEWER 1. There is an existing 15-inch diameter sanitary sewer main located on site. 2. The Sewer System Development Charge (SDC) will be $5,301.80 (the rate is $0.106 x 50,017 square foot of property). A redevelopment credit will apply for existing sewer connections. 3. This fee is payable with the construction permit. - 4. Parking garages shall require floor drains and,shall be connected to the sanitary sewer. Flows shall be directed through floor drains that,are installed in:accordance with the UPC to an exterior oil/water separator or as otherwise,approved`bV the'City of Renton:.,The separator shall be sized to meet a minimum 15-minute retention lime for peak flows anticipated in the garage area, but in no case will be less than 200 gallons of storage capacity,The type,of interceptor shall be as manufactured by Pipe Inc., Utility:Vault:Inc:,or,approved equal. SURFACE WATER 1. There are storm facilities located in Burnett Avenue South. 2. System Development Clarges,have'been paid in full No additional fee is owed. 3. No water quality treatment is required:- No detention calculations are'required for this project 4. A Drainage Report has been submitted and reviewed TRANSPORTATION 1. Traffic mitigation fees of $31,350. The fee is based on 418 new net trips x$75 will be assessed and are payable at the time of issue of permit. 2. Street improvements including, but not limited to paving, sidewalks, curbs & gutter, street signs and streetlights are required along the Burnett Avenue property frontage. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 3. Separate permits for side sewers, driveway cuts, water meters and backflow device will be required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate and application fee shall be submitted at the sixth floor counter. It is recommended to call 425-430-7266 for a fee estimate generated by the permit system. advisorynotes f 95 Burnett Project LUA-00-171,SA-H,ECF Advisory Notes (continued) Page 3 of 3 4. Separate permit to cut and cap existing utilities to existing structures on site will be required as part of the demolition permit. 5. Applicant will require approval from Metro for the proposed relocation of the sewer main on the site. 6. A traffic study has been submitted and is currently under review. PARKS 1. A Certified Arborist shall evaluate all trees located on the abutting park property and submit a report recommending trees for removal or relocation and measures to be taken to assure tree survival. 2. . All proposed improvements located on park property shall be reviewed and approved prior to construction permit approval. 3. The buildings should be modified or easements acquired for roofline encroachments. 4. Location of underground storage tanksshall•be identified on:;the site plans. • PLANNING 1. The subject site is designated .Center .Downtown (CD):zone..' The project is subject to all development standards for:this zone as well as the Urban Center Design Overlay District Guidelines. 2. Project requires a public hearingfor site plan:approval,.`;; ;, 3. The site is located within the City.Center:,Sign;Regulation Area: • advisorynotes CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-00-171,SA-H,ECF APPLICANT: PDSK Properties, Inc. PROJECT NAME: 95 BURNETT PROJECT DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The proposed project will include the demolition of Lande Feed Mill and several other small commercial buildings located onsite to construct a four-story apartment structure containing 118 dwelling units. The density for the project is approximately 91 dwelling units/acre. The first floor will contain structured parking with 164 stalls. Vehicular access is via Burnett Avenue South. The property is zoned Center Downtown (CD). The proposed project will include thinning and replanting trees in the adjacent park and the addition of a small plaza to create pedestrian connections to Burnett Avenue South and to the building lobby area. Additionally, the project will remove two underground storage tanks. One tank is located onsite; the other is located just off-site on park property. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 73, 75, 77 and 95 Burnett Avenue South LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM February 26, 2001. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: February 12, 2001 DATE OF DECISION: February 6, 2001 SIGNATURES: 21 6/0 i Gregg im�i rman, 4fistrator DAT De artme�it f PI in /Buildin /Public Works P 9 9 `mod kil £UO( Co J munity Services F e4 r, Fire Chief DATE Renton Fire Department dnsmsig CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-00-171,SA-H,ECF APPLICANT: PDSK Properties, Inc. PROJECT NAME: 95 BURNETT PROJECT DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The proposed project will include the demolition of Lande Feed Mill and several other small commercial buildings located onsite to construct a four-story apartment structure containing 118 dwelling units. The density for the project is approximately 91 dwelling units/acre. The first floor will contain structured parking with 164 stalls. Vehicular access is via Burnett Avenue South. The property is zoned Center Downtown (CD). The proposed project will include thinning and replanting trees in the adjacent park and the addition of a small plaza to create pedestrian connections to Burnett Avenue South and to the building lobby area. Additionally, the project will remove two underground storage tanks. One tank is located onsite; the other is located just off-site on park property. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 73, 75, 77 and 95 Burnett Avenue South MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations of the Geotech Consultants Inc. May 20, 1999 geotechnical study with regard to site preparation and building foundations. 2. All underground storage tanks associated with the development shall be removed and any soil contamination abated per Department of Ecology regulations. Documentation of compliance with this mitigation measure by DOE shall be submitted prior to building permit approval. 3. All soil and water contamination identified in the two site environmental studies conducted by Environmental Associates, Inc. must be abated to DOE standards. Documentation of compliance by DOE shall be submitted prior to building permit approval. 4. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $388 per new multi-family unit. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to issuance of a building permit. 5. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The required mitigation shall be paid prior to issuance of a building permit. 6. The applicant shall pay a Parks Department mitigation fee of $354.51 per new multi-family unit. The required mitigation fee shall be paid prior to building permit approval. 7. Prior to demolition of the Lande Feed Store, the applicant shall contract with a commercial pest control company to conduct and implement a rodent abatement program. This program shall be reviewed and approved by the Development Services Division and a report submitted by the pest control service verifying the program has been fully implemented prior to approval of the demolition permit. MITMEASURES CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-00-171,SA-H,ECF APPLICANT: PDSK Properties, Inc. PROJECT NAME: 95 BURNETT PROJECT DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The proposed project will include the demolition of Lande Feed Mill and several other small commercial buildings located onsite to construct a four-story apartment structure containing 118 dwelling units. The density for the project is approximately 91 dwelling units/acre. The first floor will contain structured parking with 164 stalls. Vehicular access is via Burnett Avenue South. The property is zoned Center Downtown (CD). The proposed project will include thinning and replanting trees in the adjacent park and the addition of a small plaza to create pedestrian connections to Burnett Avenue South and to the building lobby area. Additionally, the project will remove two underground storage tanks. One tank is located onsite; the other is located just off-site on park property. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 73, 75, 77 and 95 Burnett Avenue South Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flow is 5250 GPM. One hydrant is required with in 150 feet of the structure and five additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of fire alarm and sprinkler systems. POLICE 1. 109 calls for service are expected annually. Please contact Cindy Diggers of the Renton Police Department for construction phase and building safety related comments. PLAN REVIEW WATER 1. The Water System Development Charge (SDC) will be $7,702.62 (the rate is $0.154 x 50,017 square feet of property). The fee is payable with the construction permit. A redevelopment credit will apply for existing water connections. 2. 8-inch and 24-inch water mains are located in Burnett Avenue South. Preliminary fire flow is 5250 GPM. To meet this requirement the project will require 6 hydrants. The two existing hydrants on the 8-inch main will be counted and 4 addition hydrants will need to be installed on the 24-inch main in Burnett. Existing hydrants shall be retrofitted with Stortz "quick disconnect' fittings. 95 Burnett Project LUA-00-171,SA-H,ECF Advisory Notes (continued) Page 2 of 3 3. Combination meters are not allowed. Separate connections and meters are required for domestic, irrigation and fire sprinkler services. 4. A separate utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation of the double detector check valve assembly for the fire sprinkler system, if the backflow device is to be installed inside the building. Applicant shall submit a copy of the mechanical plan showing location and installation. 5. Buildings that exceed 30 feet in height will require a backflow device to be installed on domestic water meters. SANITARY SEWER 1. There is an existing 15-inch diameter sanitary sewer main located on site. 2. The Sewer System Development Charge (SDC) will be $5,301.80 (the rate is $0.106 x 50,017 square foot of property). A redevelopment credit will apply for existing sewer connections. 3. This fee is payable with the construction permit. 4. Parking garages shall require floor drains and shall be connected to the sanitary sewer. Flows shall be directed through floor drains that are installed in accordance with the UPC to an exterior oil/water separator or as otherwise approved by the City of Renton. The separator shall be sized to meet a minimum 15-minute retention time for peak flows anticipated in the garage area, but in no case will be less than 200 gallons of storage capacity. The type of interceptor shall be as manufactured by Pipe Inc., Utility Vault Inc., or approved equal. SURFACE WATER 1. There are storm facilities located in Burnett Avenue South. 2. System Development Charges have been paid in full. No additional fee is owed. 3. No water quality treatment is required. No detention calculations are required for this project 4. A Drainage Report has been submitted and reviewed TRANSPORTATION 1. Traffic mitigation fees of $31,350. The fee is based on 418 new net trips x$75 will be assessed and are payable at the time of issue of permit. 2. Street improvements including, but not limited to paving, sidewalks, curbs & gutter, street signs and streetlights are required along the Burnett Avenue property frontage. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 3. Separate permits for side sewers, driveway cuts, water meters and backflow device will be required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate and application fee shall be submitted at the sixth floor counter. It is recommended to call 425-430-7266 for a fee estimate generated by the permit system. advisorynotes 95 Burnett Project LUA-00-171,SA-H,ECF Advisory Notes (continued) Page 3 of 3 4. Separate permit to cut and cap existing utilities to existing structures on site will be required as part of the demolition permit. 5. Applicant will require approval from Metro for the proposed relocation of the sewer main on the site. 6. A traffic study has been submitted and is currently under review. PARKS 1. A Certified Arborist shall evaluate all trees located on the abutting park property and submit a report recommending trees for removal or relocation and measures to be taken to assure tree survival. 2. All proposed improvements located on park property shall be reviewed and approved prior to construction permit approval. 3. The buildings should be modified or easements acquired for roofline encroachments. 4. Location of underground storage tanks shall be identified on the site plans. PLANNING 1. The subject site is designated Center Downtown (CD) zone. The project is subject to all development standards for this zone as well as the Urban Center Design Overlay District Guidelines. 2. Project requires a public hearing for site plan approval. 3. The site is located within the City Center Sign Regulation Area. advisorynotes ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION&PUBLIC HEARING POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: 95 BURNETT PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-00.171,SA-H,ECF The proposed project will include the demolition of Lande Feed ME and several other small commercial buildings located onsite to construct a four-story apartment structure containing 118 dwelling units. The density for the project is approximately 91 dwelling units/acre. The first floor will contain structured parking with 164 stalls. Vehicular access Is via Burnett Avenue South. The property Is zoned Center Downtown(CD). The proposed project will Include thinning and replanting trees In the adjacent park and the addition of a small plaza to create pedestrian connections to Burnett Avenue South and to the building lobby area. Additionally,the project will remove two underground storage tanks. One tank is located onsite;the other Is located Just off-site on park property.Location:73,75,77 and 95 Burnett Avenue South. ( ) THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE HAS THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ONINED THE ENVIRONMENT, Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed In writing on or before 5:00 PM February 28,2001. Appeals must be flied in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 44-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)-430.6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,Washington,on March 13,2001 at 9:00 AM to consider the proposed Site Plan.If the environmental determination is appealed,the appeal will be hoard as part of this public hearing. _3i.. ml 3i :illllins.:y k, a . � •1ra ELK 1S rl'.lit,S i4J��&. 'Wynuc+ ..,•,:• R.I. n ,, Ice• •N �, m ttL M it t �.�\ • NO. �I � 0 / tea 1� :. " ; .Y .3 ,e . Itoy t7rZ'1i siE tLrr• rI1SflrCd a i tm'� t ml f Ufa .'PA uat sus •SSW 'rr.'QTm 'i/SCci rt _.., w�sys.s�-� ,. -- FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT( DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUTj430-7200.PROPER AUTHORIZATION II Please Include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file Identification. • L Vet a hereby certify that in _I_ copies of the above document were posted by me 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on �� ATTEST Signed: . Subcnbed ern inbefore me,a Nortary Public, and for e State of Washington residing in on the day of J - MARILYN KA MCHEFF - i NOTARY PUBLIC rti : u y; FF -: - STA�EEOFWASHINGTON �.� ,� . ...• COMMISSION ISSION EXPIRES ` Alice [ �'C a u T :6 u 4 JUNE 29,2003 > ; NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. ,i 95 BURNETT PROJECT LUA-00-171,SA-H,ECF Environmental review for proposed construction of four-story apartment building with 118 dwelling units. Location: 73, 75, 77 &95 Burneet Ave. So. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM February 26, 2001. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington, on March 13, 2001 at 9:00 AM to consider the proposed Site Plan. If the environmental determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. Publication Date: February 12,2001 Account No. 51067 dnsmpub.dot STAFF City of Renton REPORT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE February 6, 2001 Project Name 95 Burnett Applicant PDSK Properties, Inc. 621 Pacific Avenue#300 Tacoma, WA 98402 File Number LUA-00-171, SA-H, Project Manager Steve Taylor ECF Project Description The proposed project will include the demolition of Lande Feed Mill and several other small commercial buildings located onsite to construct a four-story apartment structure containing 118 dwelling units. The density for the project is approximately 91 dwelling units/acre. The first floor will contain structured parking with 164 stalls. Vehicular access is via Burnett Avenue South. The property is zoned Center Downtown (CD). The proposed project will include thinning and replanting trees in the adjacent park and the addition of a small plaza to create pedestrian connections to Burnett Avenue South and to the building lobby area. Additionally, the project will remove two underground storage tanks. One tank is located onsite; the other is located just off-site on park property. Project Location 73, 75, 77 and 95 Burnett Avenue South Exist. Bldg. Area gsf All existing buildings will be Proposed New Bldg. 152,021-sf removed Area gsf Site Area 56,557-sf(1.298 acres) Total Building 152,021-sf Area gsf RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of f Non-Significance-Mitigated. '.t v �� � .1:31h � i te gal IIummr11fAug /•Ycrn`„ "qaa — fJ.V.1.40 ter "11 r " " t" "Eitr4212 A1.94 rt: 1=F' r - „ sk. _ `., \\N V4r n` i n!.. 1,67 -cat mom ral2 AlIfi ?it" r EA =di MEM • KW@ 3.i1 ;gib` fa. M6..r• 'ate3/4, 41/4 � �� Z' '. :.»fir, 4+'I' ERCRPT.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmenta dew Committee Staff Report 95 BURNETT LUA-00-171,SA-H,ECF REPORT OF FEBRUARY 6,2001 Page 2 of 7 B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF X DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. X Issue DNS-M with a 14-day Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations of the Geotech Consultants Inc. May 20, 1999 geotechnical study with regard to site preparation and building foundations. 2. All underground storage tanks associated with the development shall be removed and any soil contamination abated per Department of Ecology regulations. Documentation of compliance with this mitigation measure by DOE shall be submitted prior to building permit approval. 3. All soil and water contamination identified in the two site environmental studies conducted by Environmental Associates, Inc. must be abated to DOE standards. Documentation of compliance by DOE shall be submitted prior to building permit approval. 4. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee equal to$388 per new multi-family unit. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to issuance of a building permit. 5. The applicant,shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The required mitigation shall be paid prior to issuance of a building permit. 6. The applicant shall pay a Parks Department mitigation fee of$354.51 per new multi-family unit. The required mitigation fee shall be paid prior to building permit approval. 7. Prior to demolition of the Lande Feed Store, the applicant shall contract with a commercial pest control company to conduct and implement a rodent abatement program. This program shall be reviewed and approved by the Development Services Division and a report submitted by the pest control service verifying the program has been fully implemented prior to approval of the demolition permit. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flow is 5250 GPM. One hydrant is required with in 150 feet of the structure and five additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of fire alarm and sprinkler systems. POLICE 1. 109 calls for service are expected annually. Please contact Cindy Diggers of the Renton Police Department for construction phase and building safety related comments. ERCRPT.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental ew Committee Staff Report • 95 BURNETT LUA-00-171,SA-H,ECF REPORT OF FEBRUARY 6,2001 Page 3 of 7 PLAN REVIEW WATER 1. The Water System Development Charge(SDC)will be $7,702.62 (the rate is $0.154 x 50,017 square feet of property). The fee is payable with the construction permit. A redevelopment credit will apply for existing water connections. 2. 8-inch and 24-inch water mains are located in Burnett Avenue South. Preliminary fire flow is 5250 GPM. To meet this requirement the project will require 6 hydrants. The two existing hydrants on the 8- inch main will be counted and 4 addition hydrants will need to be installed on the 24-inch main in Burnett. Existing hydrants shall be retrofitted with Stortz"quick disconnect'fittings. 3. Combination meters are not allowed. Separate connections and meters are required for domestic, irrigation and fire sprinkler services. 4. A separate utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation of the double detector check valve assembly for the fire sprinkler system, if the backflow device is to be installed inside the building. Applicant shall submit a copy of the mechanical plan showing location and installation. 5. Buildings that exceed 30 feet in height will require a backflow device to be installed on domestic water meters. SANITARY SEWER 1. There is an existing 15-inch diameter sanitary sewer main located on site. 2. The Sewer System Development Charge (SDC)will be$5,301.80 (the rate is $0.106 x 50,017 square foot of property). A redevelopment credit will apply for existing sewer connections. 3. This fee is payable with the construction permit. 4. Parking garages shall require floor drains and shall be connected to the sanitary sewer. Flows shall be directed through floor drains that are installed in accordance with the UPC to an exterior oil/water separator or as otherwise approved by the City of Renton. The separator shall be sized to meet a minimum 15-minute retention time for peak flows anticipated in the garage area, but in no case will be less than 200 gallons of storage capacity. The type of interceptor shall be as manufactured by Pipe Inc., Utility Vault Inc., or approved equal. SURFACE WATER 1. There are storm facilities located in Burnett Avenue South. 2. System Development Charges have been paid in full. No additional fee is owed. 3. No water quality treatment is required. No detention calculations are required for this project 4. A Drainage Report has been submitted and reviewed TRANSPORTATION 1. Traffic mitigation fees of $31,350. The fee is based on 418 new net trips x$75 will be assessed and are payable at the time of issue of permit. 2. Street improvements including, but not limited to paving, sidewalks, curbs &gutter, street signs and streetlights are required along the Burnett Avenue property frontage. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 3. Separate permits for side sewers, driveway cuts, water meters and backflow device will be required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate and application fee shall be submitted at the sixth floor counter. It is recommended to call 425-430-7266 for a fee estimate generated by the permit system. ERCRPT.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental `ew Committee Staff Report 95 BURNETT - LUA-00-171, SA-H,ECF REPORT OF FEBRUARY 6,2001 Page 4 of 7 4. Separate permit to cut and cap existing utilities to existing structures on site will be required as part of the demolition permit. 5. Applicant will require approval from Metro for the proposed relocation of the sewer main on the site. 6. A traffic study has been submitted and is currently under review. PARKS 1. A Certified Arborist shall evaluate all trees located on the abutting park property and submit a report recommending trees for removal or relocation and measures to be taken to assure tree survival. 2. All proposed improvements located on park property shall be reviewed and approved prior to construction permit approval. 3. The buildings should be modified or easements acquired for roofline encroachments. 4. Location of underground storage tanks shall be identified on the site plans. PLANNING 1. The subject site is designated Center Downtown (CD) zone. The project is subject to all development standards for this zone as well as the Urban Center Design Overlay District Guidelines. 2. Project requires a public hearing for site plan approval. 3. The site is located within the City Center Sign Regulation Area. D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 1. Earth Impacts: The apartment building is proposed on a 1.3 acre site located on the west side of Burnett Avenue S. at S. Tobin Street. The site is currently occupied by Lande Feed Company, Purcell Painting, Inc, Canber Corps and Northwest Pneumatic& Electric Repair. All existing structures will be removed during development. Geotech Consultants, Inc conducted a geotechnical evaluation of the site and a report dated May 20, 1999 was submitted for review. Subsurface conditions were evaluated by drilling four borings that encountered loose fill and alluvial soils overlying dense, gravelly sands. Due to the potential for unacceptable settlement if conventional foundations were used, the report recommended that building loads be carried on deep foundations. It stated that augercast piers are the most suitable deep foundation option as vibrations from driven pilings could potentially cause damage to surrounding structures. The report also indicated that on- grade slabs can be used, but should be reinforced with steel bars to reduce cracking due to differential settlement. Pavement sections should be supported over imported, gravelly structural fill. On-site soils are not useable for structural fill, including backfill. Geotech Consultants, Inc. also coordinated an underground storage tank (UST) location and soils sampling effort on the Lande Feed site and a report dated May 28, 1999 was submitted for review. The report located two UST's, an estimated 550 gallon tank located on the south east portion of site and a larger 2,644 gallon tank located just off-site on City of Renton Park Property. The on-site tank appeared to contain gasoline and the off-site tank was thought to contain heating oil as feed lines were identified leading into the furnace room of the Lande Feed building. Two borings were taken on the Lande site and tested for diesel and oil range hydrocarbons. No contamination was found in the analyzed samples. No borings or soil samples were taken in the vicinity of the off-site tank. Environmental Associates, Inc (EAI) conducted subsurface sampling and testing of the northern portion of the proposed project site (Starkovich Property), now occupied by Canber Corps, Purcell Painting, Inc and Northwest Pneumatic & Electric Repair. A report dated February 10, 2000 was submitted for review. It appears that portions of this property contained a bulk petroleum distribution facility prior to the early-to-mid 1960's. ERCRPT.doc City'of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental few Committee Staff Report • 95 BURNETT - LUA-00-171,SA-H,ECF REPORT OF FEBRUARY 6,2001 Page 5 of 7 The scope of the February 2000, study was to specifically look at the southern portion of the Starkovitch property, addressed 75 & 77 Burnett Avenue S. now occupied by Purcell Painting, Inc and Northwest Pneumatic & Electric Repair. The report indicated that no soil or groundwater contamination was indicated in the samples taken. However, the February 10, 2000 report indicated that an earlier investigation was conducted in September of 1999 by EAI on the northern portion of the Starkovitch property, addressed 73 Burnett Avenue South and now occubied by Canber Corps. The September 21,1999 report was not submitted to the City for review, but the February 2000 report revealed that contaminants were found in the soil and ground water which exceeded Washington Department of Ecology thresholds requiring cleanup._ To address probable environmental impacts to the soil and water, both tanks must be removed during the development of this project. At that time, additional soils sampling in the areas of the tanks shall be conducted and contaminated soils (if present) should be properly disposed of in accordance with local, state, and federal regulations. Additionally, all soil and water contamination identified in the site environmental studies conducted by EAI must be abated to DOE standards and documentation of compliance submitted to the City. Mitigation Measures: 1. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations of the Geotech Consultants Inc. May 20, 1999 geotechnical study with regard to site preparation and building foundations. 2. All underground storage tanks associated with the development shall be removed and any soil contamination abated per Department of Ecology regulations. Documentation of compliance with this mitigation measure by DOE shall be submitted prior to building permit approval. 3. All soil and water contamination identified in the two site environmental studies conducted by Environmental Associates, Inc. must be abated to DOE standards. Documentation of compliance by DOE shall be submitted prior to building permit approval. Nexus: Environmental Ordinance (SEPA) 2. Surface Water Impacts: The applicant submitted a Level One Downstream Analysis prepared by ABK Engineers, Inc. dated December 12, 2000. Stormwater from the developed site would be directed to the storm drainage system in Burnett Avenue South, to South Tillicum Street, Williams Avenue South and subsequently to the Cedar River. The report indicates no evidence of flooding or erosion problems throughout the course of the downstream conveyance system or documented downstream problems. No significant adverse impacts to the downstream system are anticipated. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation measures are recommended. Nexus: N/A 3. Fire Services Impacts: The proposal site is located within the Renton Fire Department service area. Preliminary review indicates fire standards would require a fire flow of 5,250 GPM. The proposal would add new construction to the City and would impact the Fire Department's ability to provide service. To offset this additional obligation, a Fire Mitigation Fee should apply to all new construction at a rate of$388.00 per multi-family unit. Estimated fees would be$45,784. A redevelopment credit may be applied for the existing buildings. ERCRPT.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environments view Committee Staff Report • 95 BURNETT LUA-00-171,SA-H,ECF REPORT OF FEBRUARY 6,2001 Page 6 of 7 Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee equal to$388 per new multi-family unit. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to issuance of a building permit. Nexus: Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution and adopting ordinance, Environmental Review(SEPA) 4. Transportation • Impacts: Vehicles will enter and exit the parking garage via an on-site auto court with access from Burnett Avenue S. The project is located in the central business district and therefore parking exempt. If the project were subject to parking ratios, the City would impose a minimum requirement of 159 stalls (1.2 stalls for each 1 BR/studio & 1.6 stalls for each 2 BR apartment). The applicant is voluntarily proposing to provide 164 parking stalls in structured parking located under the building. The development would result in an increase in traffic trips on the local street system and therefore would be subject to the City's Transportation Mitigation Fee. A Traffic Impact Analysis, dated November 29, 2000, by Transportation Planning & Engineering, Inc. was submitted for review. The analysis estimated that 418 additional average daily trips would be generated by this project. To offset the impacts to the City's transportation facilities, a Transportation Mitigation Fee is calculated at $75 per average daily trip attributable to the project. The traffic mitigation fee for this project is estimated to be$31,350. Truck hauling hours are limited to between 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. under the Development Guidelines Ordinance in order to avoid conflicts with peak hour traffic. The Traffic Planning Section will review construction-related impacts prior to issuing final construction permits. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. This fee is payable prior to issuance of the building permit. Nexus: Transportation Mitigation Fee Resolution 5. Community Services/Parks Impacts: The proposed subdivision would create 118 new multi-family dwelling units. Residents will make use of existing and future park and recreation facilities throughout the City. In order to mitigate for the impact of the development on the City's parks and recreation facilities the City has adopted a mitigation fee of $354.51 per new multi-family unit to address these impacts. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay a Parks Department mitigation fee of$354.51 per new multi-family unit. The required mitigation fee shall be paid prior to building permit approval. Nexus: Parks Mitigation Fee Resolution and adopting Ordinance, Environmental Ordinance (SEPA) 6. Rodent Infestation Impacts: With the clearing out of the Lande Feed Store in preparation for demolition, the City has been contacted by neighbors who are experiencing a rise in rodent infestation. McLendon's Hardware is also seeing an increase,in rodent problems. There is the potential for an enormous number of mice and rats that have made their home at the Feed Store being displaced into the surrounding community. To alleviate this likely impact on the surrounding neighborhood the applicant should be required to conduct a rodent abatement program for the site. ERCRPT.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental( Jew Committee Staff Report 95 BURNETT - LUA-00-171,SA-H,ECF REPORT OF FEBRUARY 6,2001 Page 7 of 7 Mitigation Measures: Prior to demolition of the Lande Feed Store, the applicant shall contract with a commercial pest control company to conduct and implement a rodent abatement program. This program shall be reviewed and approved by the Development Services Division and a report submitted by the pest control service verifying the program has been fully implemented prior to approval of the demolition permit. Nexus: Environmental Ordinance, (SEPA) E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM February 26,2001. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. ERCRPT.doc E4 • 8T23NR5" W1/2 o Ar I. ...__,___ R13 , - _� Tdo 1 1,i .- .- , 0-10 a HU WI . R w -e- a oo- -a_.- .-_ ' ' — 2 c -erm-7- -c-r-cr -,._ r.-1 ,... Art P ) o-- -a) co ,d o - - _. - CA j(-i ce ..T --w- --ce 277 R_g`_ _ _ a __ ! I4& ' RIB --_ ' ;/ -CZ -CO. --di-L- ---7 -- U- IITH ' Ti: 1_L_ gQ- i=1)0 I\ -_-...=- __.1_ ___I__ _co co- --..- ---- ..= u- se ---- -1- 1 - " _0 stie . , \ R-1 CP) --,4- --cti a� co. _� i ,,/ --- 1 i - - P-. • -Ai:: (21L4 -- ____--TaiT, -- __TTi ___ 1-1441 - _ _CX_ a *a_ R8 _P -- N . P' N \-. R-8 FO l/ -; `•. -� �,- Z -1S t. __._.a a C A, i __ NN, \\,. // , L.,,,,,c,,rn, as ra:ai I ' ; / ,.:>< ‘ 7.‘.! °.. --IL- . -C-A. —__ le IN' ' ///, tp .n, man - . . , , , , „le_.ce__ 75._ •44 s , \\ ,/;... , 1 \`$% , 40 ..........„ _ 0 _7-1 \ N...„:,-49,- \ I hit NhliN \'' ._,_ n ri 9 2:/_, ,-co - no ------- - - _ s ^ �- N I Nil ---- -RM,U \ N / -- __. __ ii--- -\-----± RM- ->-, \ 4 CA ( P ) -CD N\ _ co Z S 2nd St'. CD CD �°�\., C N __ 1 H N 00 - CD -- CD -.- c _3_. _ -1 - CD13L) CD '---_- \ v" - _... ..er_-__,_:..._1_ a r:__\\k,. ___.:65_,2../..,,7. v�i \ CD_ --LCD -.CD i - 1 RC _ __- CD CD<P> - T� _ =D CD / 1 / / _ . __- �..� / -- i"-T-i r---r---1 r -, - / :, — Ig II i �' u 1 ui ter. a, _ — .ro,—_,„ _._—.—b_— -- yli( U DER AVENUE SOUTH 1 A 1/ mnnarom lam wee °Am' A — _. _1... nva�,m o.0 wo uoevz $ c __ c. .11652 ,a,enae eml. "i r `, /L.-,--1 � e��l' �: ra, / i''T j�_^_i—+ iaw• �\�.\ is 1tL •, •� I♦� i%���- � r �w•myrric %� • ',.r.9, 1- '?';ice f 1 ,;1 - i%; %:/.;' :•,%1.;1; : :% 1. ',: '' Yi1 ' �'/f ' %i /. / [.., .� '� _ I QI� PROPOSErAI OCOURT `%'%� ./. ,h-:-=.!.. ' �• ,� t /. .P,ai / i.� I:I •�,I:',. I :!%;j,. ./ ':oY11.Bl G'0'�: .,, , I W 1 I. -- • / 1.1 .L' ' i 'l'.� .'y ;LY , , � pefj4 eina,n ea`rcrrrotc' ��,: ,, '!. ,5..°,M,�grb# �pf/.. 4 .!, .:i •,:/ r 1 L' r 9jT I` l 1 I11 , '� `I . Ct 1 --11 --!Ir"-,—,----\ —1,----.—" — "4:, ' ---- — I)V eat cart. I: t MAIN PEDESTfiIAR slu° a M b'N CONNECTION TO PARK m XI ..-Do PEDESTRIAN MALL CONNECTION , - `"�"�' ' FROM BURNER AVENUE TO PARK rya ma 1....my • . a O " "'o "'c i G • BURNETT PLACE SOUTH I SITE PLAN m^' SCALE:1.20 ~ Projat Tam PRIMORUM W.KS NOM,x nmaP PC OWED BY:15 Co..ro.15.moo Sik flan Approval • _A__1.1 LOGAN AVENUE SOUTH ._ 2uooN i / EE--„.z.r. .000.3 KLL.CMYGri ,I.n, _—c I. — l � .. II. II/_- \�I.■.II%����7�i�ll�i■■II11�' i.. .■■� I_..__...----- � � �1l -.. Tar. _ n!'7i J ■■■ ■■, ® ■■■ a ' 11111 ®® _nl I�i1 ® min ® Iiii1 Iii1 ® _F��1 i ® _ — �� Ili f�ffil Hi ffi [ i f f f Iii fF Ili ' If f "LPL+ � � — ❑o, ^y^ ❑moo 013 g �m.m. 0 0 0 0 g o o_0 0 0 ❑._a o ❑_ 0 o o o o a 0 a o o.0 ❑ ❑ o ❑'___.orT�L�� � ( 1 r 0 © ❑ m ■ vx■ a�■ �S9 acta _ � Iti■ a c�' F] ® ❑ .�»„ {. L_LJri_______ TE, -- CL© 1: R _�_- p °1 I "^ dti_ :1 cs as _■ rs v is. ir�,a . r'Il m. El L3�.= •�•m a —LE.w EXIST.M..DC Of,h In4 roc moor. .WFS•TO EFRRIT WJISauUOooR r0T4 RN2 Lo BUILDING"A" -2 EAST ELEVATION RCALL•3,32.I'-B L Y co 2 / ec' wrtL'vn Oaur MVP.MAL scws ®u►nw1 4AL au.lo..d -_ T.onom LfivEL.claur.. __—._ 1 II 4÷;;; L.,.sL . .\II■■■111% Q ; lig e II H JI �1' IIil ■i■ _lli Iil1 ■■■ ■ri, ® ■■■ _Ifor ii_,_ II I I 111 ® , ® z i s 1. rlcOn CL..d,' - l _ ® ill ul ® n1 il1 ® I111 ® nl ri ® ® ® -- ® : di . .. _ m = 1=1 =1=1 0=1_ =1_1_ =1 1= = e ® ® ® ® ® �q o — hill 1 1 1 I l• f� ■■■ 1 1 1 11 1 1 1.1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 f II f--' eL sv,• © 0 0 El 51.C1, ■C3' ,4 q tl# AY 1$;,/i, 4T■ 1if GI i'.t5 Fd,i! .al ESM RiCk j __ ' �' ST RI MIL=Io e-- ,A,, © © ❑ cs m eairc ■r►, as ai sas p o w, 141■ s CM ■a at tsar to s� tl I I �,� WARM PC LF!?lwm,ru aRAR J TIK r IS AWt OTOIEIlM''''' LCR a 4 aW®PA1 BRrt rAGp CMLL MTEAmb I!.IDm •TIT IIRS). rpa2 ,[6•SGFOIY o•1F •N.rt FAm c,vl BUILDING"A" . , WEST ELEVATION > .., A5.1 . ATP.,EREMES unODEH rF6LLb AMNLT br0laLEa 1 t. STUCCO Vei aDttl (/ VMTL ROM A aDM 4 FLs TOJawE �WEER� METAL CO,. YlTK WW®WLL ''''''' R.-cf K'KNI tL N 1' ' - r Aral. ......" m, EL_�E . I- I E �m ■.. \IL..■II% \IL■.■II%= II..■IV.... n�� v v v ■■■ 1111 1I " 1i1 ■■■ ii!° r�� ■■■ II 11 ■■■ _lii�_li_,I 11 ■ ' 1n■■ - IIIII IItrio ■ an f hii1 ® �l ii ® ■n■ ® 11la ��1 I" ®® �_ Wig III I® ®®�o ��n EL .' ii ii r Iliil n'ii ii Ioi1 ii ii Gii iii ii ii liii =1FPI mil = I ' 1 : 1 w� — �J_ b��.=,,,• ❑ ❑ mom ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ o ❑ ❑ ❑ p ❑ ❑ o ❑ p p ❑ ❑ ❑ p ❑ p g ❑ g ❑ ❑ ❑ s== ❑ ,, 1 I A. ❑o ❑❑ Do [ a , t a Ea,. —OAT adI NIG!' tlitii- I� !_�i IV -Imr l_ IS n'i;-_ .., � I_ ■ 'w_us� .-aka r _� L�1 ® II I� t �rxara .o a -ads �,a �, I is.a; ;1a I lal as as cta - ":I: ,% :. .1.: :.:' : 4®®- .K METAL FRAM —LP6 OF MOMS aP.Wa \ N aTa,L c K FAMI®nAR LPLn FACE fare EL000S— STEEL aF.01OT,FenrF ALva OTOWpnT ILESZY rear &FLIT new Coma moots XI BUILDING"B" -0 EAST ELEVATION SCALE 3!3.2'0,0' ewveLea 1a_awfaT rYIK caPe.a vAYTL�� .6rsL eDtn .reo n¢Laro ropxs Le . ,/ Nll ._. ........ \Il o■II% \II.� %.. \=11� _■1 ■■. ... ror LllJ ■ 1111 (■lin _l.n� I'u1 t■■ ■n�� ® ..� In'_iel1 ins _Ll�!'' 1ii- nil ■■ t I a .e.a., lis FERAL FR.r6 -. El rtT.La FAR El a En !!i _ ■■w111 --I ID LEVEL in u. . .... .... Ei H9filiiii ITQf n MITI 119 ii■ F Ffi — 0 r- ■ :, ❑ `•— yes lm ■r 'i�t2 w a �e feiIaJr_ P piT■ s r l air lug Fla] an El ® © as'as a _ ill I K `I I.'',. _/ — Ii a, AEI ass au L■lai pig ■gym Mtn a mr PA AA li f t61� fag 15m 13 0 © gall er exu�fnnFf. LEO PIXWTER WOOS now.FRAM aAw,4E LeV , PM=1MO S rB =mCITEI1 T taoauvoaw_j FI0Ee1 tmnmr.Fe eFRn FA4E cE+u / \ rEru uu�w�R OWN MI ea -__— R$L eECOetr GATE aIEEL aEOxar,-FEICE OWED at 6 tear FA0?colt OLOCKS • BUILDING"B" OATEN.IS, m°° • WEST ELEVATION Ae Ilan 6C.r o•33 .I'-0' • A5.2 r ‘ .--ir-----,.>„ .V... ........................----.................... ........._ -NJ- L • .VR:1÷-0:LIT.V. - Vi...„.„...,-..--- Ar1ie.cLy -II-III-II a an•Le.eL. _ .- �T p •...�,7;_,i�, D v v 1 �— O ® L n n 6 I 11. �. - I I = ii ii ii kIro ' ::: I: m o DD.E ..., _ . ®® ° fiaH ° ® ° P.LE£L — i®ii - g i_ _ _ OE El Ate. . _...._..........._ ❑ = ❑N — � � ; ❑ ® ® o00 CC ❑ ❑ �� , Vol, o o LL__1 _I1J o 0 OKpib SWK wowrM'VOlD M4Y.L °,EEL GCW,T TIE! BUILDING"B" WEST ELEVATION 1 • NORTH ELEVATION &SECTION THRU COMMON AREA -CALF 3/32-0.-0• SCALE 3/32'.r-m• L Y f �E °" moo' ----\\I-- ❑ ❑ -I'❑; �I 11 ■■■■■ II 11 ■■■ II g 1 CCR 4.WA, -_ D.%6e ® — rlwb b� ❑ ❑ li ii nn ®® n ® n iii ii ® [ = I a III WLeY l �.. epsa s 11 IPA II D MI:: : UM PP:Po E,°ETW NO.noroeeo aw.oc aman EF.ES artrosti.:4 POW BUILDING"A" Approval` SOUTH ELEVATION &SECTION THRU COMMON AREA EAST ELEVATION , SCALE 3/3�..,.-m. �3r3,•.r.m, A5.3 i _ S,Nf TLCCO SONSLNT EB WM dpN] I.COEw rs..u.le vIt a - AA m Bm �ELeIN'TONfr. _..__ w •e.nwr _ • CZ Ell III ..Loow 0 ❑ }-'fi § iOPiaLAB EL Jil' ❑ ❑ 7 • ® in in ®I❑❑ A urYeBTTot 1-1 11EL J � _44.GE LEVEL LML' 1-tRrt PACE CJ„J LodeO die.bJ4Oe 1 NEu BUILDING'°A" rn NORHT ELEVATION SCALE:3/32'.1'-0' Cl \... m EDGE a.,..� 14 '�❑ ® n ®V�11 //❑ .till -_4V®l ® ....I, ._-- .. Td.LES'S,—� � �1� m ITI m9 ❑ ❑ Pf79 Pt � . ❑❑ 0 0 0 El 0 0 ❑ 0 ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ .TECAE t=� �= EL SAJI' B w�oc�6T Project Tram -.IL fl06f SCR.MS L.o WV,.dd. / NUS MOS.:PC tll®1 ES PG BUILDING"B" °`°®"'S SOUTH ELEVATION. • �EPr ,a ° Silt flan SCALE 3/334-ES APPava A5.4 .0. d : 3 a.. .;u...535,4 .-LB. '.�?' ARI;.`.waf,�! %/\, lug ''-' ! 'A,1!.CR J^: IaS "n :049 _S : .,\ S •'' i 4 n 5: •eli •. -y!>Rux._6:7'•pap / I..I i9YI • - ,tea/r• .' r �",GGL:Ir:.as \ - ^ei•,' y Ra..3r'L' :-,1 `�.4*,V; 1 Prt f� �<��b�r `?5.r Fv.. 7;9;I.94 A'O'S f 51 ! i - - Q'�/'-TC _ __ C9:cC,.:/ 1 i 1 I -III •�r V ``_ -?1=».v^.. _.. _... .... • 1 y,., •• •■ r\� E•3»5L 6•C.n,•,. C3: __._-__ II 'M ▪5 JY! r --_ o%b_ ■L : I R!M-55 Si ' }.56 ` + I' ,� "l .fry I rti,■ IC_34 i2 6'CJVC• . ...'51.':9•CJI.i.,.v •\: 11 •I`1' Iv '- - 11 e • I ra -- • 1 'i•hJV: s, %,y -+-.- r -VI ! =:F ;5zi I I < .___ , --NE n`n1 7: ?IA+3c. V 4..7..q,'geJ ` wp -� s --�_�. j—t-! •i__ e r _.may - ,.6.".1,: , f. /� ak ; ■ 'bA.n} 5 -K: ti • • I In I - '=`?•�.v �v ey 5.1 "YI.}}.9 • 'i '"^ F ! ■ ,I S. S545F:>:� ?t35." n 43•WiA`7'24:9 9,,49 ..3zL >',c .�} I=' r• `i ix.' i I a .3: • G --32,, YVC h:''f•' ' `!. -__J7,ty, _ r� ,c,"l'� 'd _26::6 se S 32 4: :5' ' 1'.•6 ���qqq L m ,,,;,,,a_ I' ' Y It Q b'c -26.39 8--r;C r Z: ;$'- 1 n.�';"y y''••'.SI' - SSo-._.<'TI ���'�i �..Y_A Y: 55,t 5' -, QI I !`'', 4 ! AK 4 I ~ ' "IE _ fi;: ---..-.-.-__ "48'_a',- _ Q1 a.,,4.3n 15 I , r v' ' - MI 11..1952+ >s I 'f , °�'4i iE�:P' . __. ■ . '•S, i I`./..i, SS::•:r:r ,.. ee a; i ! a% I ,!� RI:a NE :597 " t' vR =e P 1 "•:C , 1.;. `. y,.3 :• _ �un Ic a ii, < ! < q?tom._ .79'.2.x. O: I t l`I m' . •5G'-M1f . Ir !1 c3 aI ' ,5 ''.:{Ce / n,> t �6 O i'" R:A!`55.15.2 ADS F. Q rY j -- I Y'I�' ;y r, T ' 13 iI 1j•1 >lji'4. .k —I `,.r uZ i • ';•;''';;),Y..:.. o f 4;r''':' ' %" - ! V1.rl"-• ', I �. J'Is ���,.+-� 'L52•R�Ex0.8F\,w {{ ,541 •} I ICi Hsi ' I I` '�$,t. .. :l=3_563;•CON: O It ,'' -1 p9. i•�i 777! ~�'e d I i ! P,d,,35.8n Ili m n'^^ IS'J o [_ _ I ___�3 °OI`IA �'� 'F-35.5<5'CLnC ,��• 5 'r�'.'''iJ7y a°i\ I 1 i.i`�-SO4H::i3.i:;;:, o �' ' ' r 1,134,, GEAC S ��� ! g; 39 e" csC. U� �A I if Ile,sI ES 4� i! 1 r-....•b'cecL c r� �'' yy i ` I: 4, lE=33.:n i s o ci �"'•'I Y4e'a T! Yrxr„• I S ui I c�,4 i�SACO r CAI-r�CE �i i I �1 — I [f I ;� RIM-37 51 .ii:t *I I ii 1 I I I�•: ;I„I..,`� a It ,. ^ € ,! .40? 4a N5829..,...✓d „'M.1_:>t ' S;' m ' i JJ 1I '.j, 1 - a :•-r I v �� S a , 1• 1 ce: V� J 1 ''I; ! 1� :F/34 4c r PVC S.-----' U' ) 'I' I i 'i r. 'ryr 3--• __r I I C I N`- i I \ 5a $' -�/ So� I IY� v 5 x • ,� 1 , ! I i a !I • 1 I I I , ,..--SDAIi r 33.3,7•LN • es g. I ei N" _ E� S > ' g1 (41, DATE BY DESCRIPTION N C" F. p , 95 Burnett — $ w ' 'T'v 1 ill THOMAS•HA6AEY N � � ..F y Areetreetr ' O P 13400 Narthup Way,Suite 30 • ^ 1 g` Bellevue,Washington 98005 (425)401-6828 •Fax(425)401-0630 PDSK Properties, Inc. Renton, Washington • . : • . •• (..,..;;.f......:, •,5..::;,) . , 5 . • F- . . • : [r1 . . N• . . . 1 . in- . . ' .• , ;•: 0 ... -''',,. / ' (NJ , V-1 • 21 .,,,...,,, i \../. . C EXIST FIRE HYDT 1,- ',:.'04:116 0. ' F 4, . -,--.L.! ' EXIST FIRE • • . WOW - 6) ..-.• WOW : , • __. .: ,.•,W/I ISO'OF BLOC 1 D ; ,.;.1". ,., i"(1) X6'::TAPPING SLEEVE(FL) i ."• ''''''.T: .1, ,,,0:5::, ; i....:,..!2: :i / .,..,..?u.i ,,,."(I) TAPPING VALVE(MID) i-2:„;T3 ,(,, (I)CONC THRUST BLOCH C , -7-.•;',?.,°;- ! '.17:-,ipir•-"! , „,..I 6,t (1) 5 LFE.,DISTELFTRSE2 ; (I)BTX6-TAPPIND tE.,,,,,.„. , , 0 =,:.,„„ , ..,,. , z.:, 4_4 .... (,)6- TApPING:VAL (FLVMS)." ' : ' I i 11";• :.'..4..... ; ,f EXISTZFRE MY-0-1 — — - ..."''' : • '--'- -- jlt-- I. 1-- -- ----- .1------- -.'t.---11 :.".":-..--.76-..,--::.7,::,-17_77..;.::.-.777-7.-.7",,117_7,77_-'744:"7.:;.'„-.: '...',";.,77.17.7,-..,4.:..-._... -- I P.' • 1--i• ,i.; 9t2 - -0- • EXIST ARE HYDT ''... .:-. .-. -----',"--" -i -,1'. -...-...-1-- - --------ttr ft:TAi7;Wroirs'VE:713- 7::::!:77:---t _-___--j-- pi i Ca ci w/i ISO.OF BLDG-, --;16 )..1.1" . "• - ..._ --i,i56-,a-i„,iy i' / SS 0 60X LC) — '0T METRE.sEwER' 'Iti r-iiii_-1 . . 7:- : -" . . • . '.•• ;.....i' ig.j_. . . • ; •Al ,-(--..---, .:__.__I—. .,; ! 1;4 , \,;.,6-c Brog?rr.-1,-'71.1 -.) ,if.", r A T241Ir 1-f- -, --i-- 'T .1.7134-0T71-71 i 1 \ -- ,77-6--COMBINATION SERVICE St CT) ctS (D 47, L_ ,,........ ....-...7,(X ,,,...:bidei.74.1ETEIS,I,sPTRAELLAR C Ni 411' I I I ; I I :T- • Nii,',, I . ' HM1111111 '1 t -tl- - ..1..LET/R IN PRECAST CONC PIT .... z„Zi ICOORO INSTALLATION W/CITY Q./ 0_ •• .,•-,'i P,C,T7F(15:11,618 REMOVE DIST SS OR ; '1 , 4te --,;:1551.1H II 48' II I 0:!5,v,K,11,i•: ,G1 -'ff---T ABANDON PER GEOTECW\ ,,v ITT',• 1 ;RIII...36.2 .1 CL :.: I • :0.,,,SEI,MC..0 2%\Typ IF ::-'''' ‘ 1580 15 PVC W .:. lEr 15.70 157$;_$._,_____.,_,_T...c...ht_ri „ 1.. Y rli : 1 1,._,i115,1,:fj---Ei„,,,:_ki.i. IT,. -... ' ;-8 11.[Rls1 ,,,,, 1 1 . , I.:: , L 1 i 1--„--„', ''I r-- l'..;hs, ,, 1.N4,... ...... ,::_i , :; . . „,,3; • ,,, - ',1::Y' --, -- I, .1 1 __i__ IIV39. 4.,:i:,:•'-1--' - dal BK-- '''-''',•-• -TAT 77.77.-T,Tr.7,1,-'---11 .-- ' --- 1' ''' ! \ II :',:-.1'-\-i I _I _ :-- ._-L2r.HE ,f.:'•_.1:51.-?..E.:'";•-•,-,— ---,-•:. .. 1...\.i.- -IA'ri.C.--• I.,. , '''''1 , L I-,..., •AMA • ft , i it.i : 1 1 ______1_1____;____ - -.*--'4 '1------- L ---1----=!---1---- 1,4,1 i 1, i i — . 1. \ z - -,-(.--'----, : i r I 11_ _ ---- , , ''''.''-"'' .• 'f--ab -.." . .--, -;" -3,<-€-'-4f,-.. ;.' .,,:rt- i(-:14-,.Y- . -'*- /-1,-;;AlsZfl'6 7. ". "rj ›K- -';*- X •5!!'O.-1‹:' : j I 1 Or-Ts IP; ...... '''' ''• ' ...__....___ - i'-§• . ;- ...-•" • 11 : .ffil , 4., - - --- • • - - - - --- •••: ... 1..s....-- -• "1 r" 1"'la o 7k ' ------------- "f-r.'11-"-. _..'fti:"- \.."• ..•..1.-----• ----'--'-'s-- A 11C13 • =.,? - . V ,, EN0NEERS,INC 6cm uhreulaw MEET•SUITT MI . :.:-':at.7...... . I `...„ M SEAM•IISSINGICII•$ITTSTV / : 1 I (1C4/UTC10:,•TAX MI sneicra • - ,r., . .... • •-•- - •• ... ...., / I AKB JOB No.200132 '..!•t. '. , t:. W.,;. Y Project Team FRUCT KOTTECT: T;'',,r...• : :.• ..,.11%/0:•, CIEOTO Iff:ST _ ....-..-.-- /OTTSI.t' /Tig,r0 DAITAkerrator 11 TECO • WATER AND SANITARY SEWER PLAN _ ..._ . I— 12-1-01 I • • STA( Permit ... - .. ._.... ... .. . .... ..._.____... sub.iitai D'A.....___ GRAPHIC SCALE ... . -A •---•• /. ... . .0 ,i! ,, ,, 1c3.0 ... - --- -------- (Strzer) / / I tir.•40 ll 200019 -------:,._cl...2.-4... SEE SHEET L1:2 FOR HARDSCAPE -r, - i ---- ! ‘C-f,.1 i 1 ....... __ , . _ • 1 Mk. i••-,7,741-. . ..1.4;,..k.,,\‘-‘‘,\-••-s-'ci,' -- .4.•-k, - --4. . \ ---_ - sw.S,• ,....A , ..s t4.,.--s1/4 st:e^i^%.,. --.. ,. i ''-'14.141f'K442.0P-'-i't,„,ktfi,,,-*FitAi_St'400*ttsiiitOilit-:.41441iVel":'0'YtA,W.,.1.e.k-;:7'.7.';'."-r_‘-FZ.,, --L--- 47:---;r= -`124- 1 • . / O.F11 1.1-,ei?,,,..-',r•-- -_•",;, 0-`...4-4sia':-.6,!,..',A•'44-'.:4.,..; 1:;,,,N1-,,,,,_;-,. .,'..L, '•,-.%1.;;,,,Ii',,,,,--,-:--*.-4'.,C..,...i;1415;',. .-c-5-11i:-,;,,,,,-..,in 1`4 Ift,,14:1:-•97"1-',,,,'?,7,,,,T1,t,,,, :''' ' - •- -,,,.. :o.t.,st,vy,‘ rillti,liV„... ,,X.fm.' ;iiii.-,‘, '-., '44 4i,,,q1'',.4'Fikkittem;ftit,://-,a'v''-'qz,:.1.„Vti/'1,Z",.. .-''''' ' _.s-L-. gt.',,,,L,",:,7-,\.„L.: ',,'-',,,W',:-,,,,,,,,,.-1:,''''',.,;-,44.,'",-t -;,',,,s\s'-';;•Y-,'',M-Tr-.,..,rt,,r;;,.**','. .''',R, 4,11.,,,,'I 1" liPq - c,„,„,,,114,,,:„ ,x,-,t,,,4,1i -* . ,,,,,,..,,,, ;,,,,,,,A‘qo:,',,,,,,-. ..,.7.7,-„,,,,),Nr-r. f.:.:'45'...1. 'A:^,i'''..'''''''.; ...''' 1pfl.,,, C7-''i's .-,t'il.;!'.1W.2 ' ,,., :Ire-„,,N,tro,e,,t,,,,,L.ii_w-,,,vt,,,,•,,--it-,,ti*4-„,,,,IliA.,,ki,,,v,..:4-,,,3,,,„•,.„,, ix E, E,-1:;11 ,e,;ri-ig,,,,,.„-,«,,,-5,,,,tii-.4.;f'.,•,,„v,„,',,, ,, t,,,,ii,;•; -,A.,t,-.-,041,,,,4,-40 4,1 -,,,44'-',)44,x„,i,•*,,,4,04711F, ''-',/•-, 1,z,-•e----,.,§`,,0 C^'5..•'4;,•,-,,t,,,,-,k,i,",;,.'\':1•:4,-.1'•-, ,-,',,-,,,1/2-e4Iir' ',,k„.:0-:VA".+1,_'.2,,ar04',8:il,,,,;,,"0 4,'',,'''7,P2-•',a,,,,,,',:','3,-'-'),.'•i0'?„',",,,-'§-,•,'''-',,,,,,t4P,-,-,"',,," ••,,ft- • F.,`" ,,.• _ ,,,,,,:,,,l.::P.17,....-i...i,•,•,,,..F.,-,0.,,,,1,,,,.,,.0,,,,' ,.47:7,1i,,',reiViNi,i7,1, -','"74,4*,,,n.2,k„ ,,,,,e,-,.. .,,t,,, -,dh - 0, , 1 ,..7-'A.,..w.,..,,v,,„'INV4H ..,,ny,tvilt,r.stW 1•5',6",=-N?V,OCA,A,,;:tn,,-4X".44.',S,V.,44,•4,,,i4,,A"t4;:4-,44•4%-d4',,A""'i,, l',.1 "! _.lq;.-,$,C1 ,„„.„./„„, • . ,_, .f...4e, L.,%:-Al .,,ii,„3-•-, ,c,-,,, ,..,„,i• •„ •,!.q.-gi.-- .,,*.•.-f, , .1.:,-,--c,,,,,,,v-wv,,, --,:,,v 1-:-,,,, .--•• •,.-:..,,. •.,-,i_,,,,„. ;141-1,,,,.. 4101i4 •V:- --A,--':, '.:t*,,!..,14,0,44-r :44'-,,t,,f,=,-4.A•tp;i4,•.,,,:„,,:.):,a-.4;74.1t 1, 1 .- .•,...,'„,...::.,Lig,!-.1,0 ,',.. ,_,-...•,v . ;•-% .... ,--7-.,:..,, ,,,44,t,"4- •A•'4 ',,,044,,,,,k,,4:#1,41., '---• \-,---,-. '•----•' •-•-•-','- --'-4';',A W-4,1,,-. 1,P. '.•'.‘•••• 3?-:.-1., 'wbt,,,,,i41.•,*,,,e.,*--'-' ,44,-0-01,-,•,.,4.,-,?4.1,?rrlYv i ko,;;" c,4,,..,01LI :LF:-4,,,,-m%,,,',,,l,-..11,,*,,,,,,„,„,,,R0,,,,',I--q'-',,''''',,,g,,''''k'?''''i•.v.-.;,.`-4,54:-.1.,',,,i,,,,,',‘';t''''3;,'''''P ,\ '/'' ..- ''.':'/1 •+1,,*,,I.A'.,:-'''N:P;,',,,Z.4.1`,,,t,,,t‘.',,y.P%'''.,.,,,.L.,. .N,..,,,y,fr--.4,4r,q4q,,14,q.,,qq,,,,tir,4.t'fi,:114;:p:,'L,. . ._ ..-1--- ..E.r.__.7_41,,,,,,i;1,,,,,,4*., . ...;.„N,.... . -,1 . . . ,. , ,, r. • ,.. .,... ....'..,,, . '\:.c.z,....,,,,,.:,:' \::,-,,,,, ,,; .,,,,;*%.,,ii.•,„„,, „, sof. _p„et,,,,,,,,,k0L41,§,4:,•#4.,,t. , ,opq,v4•4604).;:•,4,'4'p,k4.-,,,D,,v,x- -1,:i). . - - ..,., ...,,,,,..-4.ipt,..k,..,,,,e,A,111,6,,,,IV'',V.W.4,4'4,'44 qs,Ll.:1,:";t4e, .1, .3 itrit, f ,••'',:I.,- t'`0 , , ••• ,,,.." ,,,,. v,,,,11' ',",...,41,,,,, r-Ir , r,r.„ ,,.. ,., ,,,,, I ,.. _,..„,,,..„..tainknt t,,...,-,,,'.4,1-0,.. Il -1 -i4L'i,''''I ,4°‘' •'1,,k,-*Z1, to',.J1‘, -'A, ,L me,* vf,',"',7.'illk",-'-'vt,,i,iv aite,t, „:.4...,..„,„...,.. .,..".,,,,-,$,A5,4„.,,„,,,,,- „,,,,„,,,.,,,,,,4,,,,,,,,,c,:,,,,,,,!,•,:‘,44-0,1Apcc.'"'".1, A.F.,•••f•'n4.4,...4374'.,IA4,:•:, •••:-• ;',,"':••!1'•,e-4, ,,..,..7-, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,44,...,.,, ,. ,,,,,,, • .,t,„. ••• t..., , ,,,. • ., .... . ,..„1.. ., • •!...t.ioe.,,,•,,h.,,,,,,i•••••.... sie .....,,,,,,,,,,.„-t-•*of 1:•:*.••,:tv,rk,:.--. •,..-•, ' 4$••<-0-: ..,,i4.-4 .. .',',.,,i,iiiii,,,;,-40.„gx.,i,,,,, ,,,,-NiqT \ al, i,..,•14,,,,,,,,,,,,,,f„,„,„;,,,T, ' ' ' l' ': '" 410,411'-94;."44.0170V; "viit • •" ',- y,-,..4a.„, ,.e•-• ,,l, . 0 , c,'',.',..47',,,,to4,:,,Ly.,,,,,,vg.z.vi,,,,,, -7.0e:7 ,0'.4,i''.„,'WzAp i-1,-,0„,,,,,, -VI, 4.-C4',"t1,.*•',,,,,,,,.mr,q011; ,''2.4,^1,,q,,,,,,,,-4',^, PA,1.,'...,,k. ' '- ,- .,'N - =,-' . 1.-TAW*Ivr,f*,--,, ,i,,'."'n-.,'-' c.r, ' ;:.'''-'--.•!Aq414'''r'tivSgIANVP"VVV'VZ,q40, ' !•*401.4'0'i',IF'N.'-wIt.t.4,.....:,-4....r'..,' :'i'.:,,,setioga ,..11,4,',1 r.-„,vc; ,... , %.00.,,,: „.„,,,,,,z1v,„,,,cAvoy;,,,,,,A40,.,,,,,,:o_4: . , 0„....,„,„,„,,...„.4.,,„„644,44.t,,,",a, . , „,-A. , to.,• ,•,,.,,; %se., ,,,*,,k,-,•d.tr,y ',., ,,Illr,::::V11,1:7,1111 Rfr',,,, .2.N,,t.,4,''44,4 -1.44,7,r in'Ofe.4 .''',7 l''',..0,,,-.4.•',4",4'$'''L.1 ....-iN, ,,,vi,,.,'wtr...,,,'0''''''''4/4'''' ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,..0„ irii. .._... a ly:,,,,t,,,A,,,,,,,,,,,;,....„..,.„.„....,,,,,,,,,,,,.„2„,,..„.,..,,,,....,,,,...„,,,,,,,..„..„,;,"„i„,„..:::: ,,,,,„,;:,,,..„.„:,,.....,,,,,,,,,,,„,„,,,,,......„,,,,,,,:.:.,.,.,;,„,, ,.,,,,i....:,...• ,...Lt.„.i-A,,,t..,,,r.,o.,N„„:":%;:-,.,,.v,„.r.,-.,gr:if,,'1,':ii,:f,,,--?--,:i- *.E" V) 0...., / . .. ..... 07,00 j At liPkv," .:',iii." 'I'imAgatiriiiiird;,10.,,f1, m• ,.. illir/A-1-- ,.N.01m,,,,i.4Lt ...... . _..... a oilieo• .,,,,,,... ,rierio54, _ ,,,,tio.. 4-. o firAh- AIWA,., •-•,. 4011, _-... ... . •," -........ • <mi., ,- 0 i•-+ a) - --,-- ....___ , . ,,.. 111,14111 0 0),.:: . iii....:I:_41/10:W. . ..,.. k-Exleleti LAN AREA-- \ ;••• ,-- •,. , / F----------7-------t10 \ \ k_EXISTatik La.AREA-) -- -- • If) c _ -----_ -.1-__________---______ CI) vi _ 0 ..;-.7 ICIti . M. 2 0 v) Key PLANT SCHEDULE 0_ Trap. Scientific Name Comm.Name I SI.. Cotenants i - .- o -,, , Cal...clactrrane P *C uneedar t ii-T hi .. 1 011FAMpli ewes dee.. AXP•rW000 C•10.11,0 cal 4gir 4wr eIrtZtr 6"""n• -Pee enne.Maple 2 1/2..1 ; ,lese cache 3 V3.cal I...st Ff tMew phemoterlos r.olkarnera. C.okernara Norma Maple 2 1/3..1 1/' I II.I ) 5,...,4.. : is• Pesndoalandron Vabla. Fable Fiht....4.....1.....IL 24.-30..as an. '' 4-1g gi.reffl Phodoctendron Vora Annals' Para Anat.122.0odendon 2 a g S gal cent 24.epr 0w%. Nand.donast.'CoquiciA. Correia i•I•averVeserboo it gal ca. • 'a i 0.4?9° Pr.us latrocarasto Ye.Ludt.' .to LW..Laval 515 30.ace II..: 8 i (),,,,°,..°, 121.knetarciron Una.. EL 0 .• E.nreis Malta Veceoccla. Co.sant tem.Suanarse B cal corn . epoco slcsr.tines 2.1/41,130....vtlaunal 311. ...,' Polasticitn neaten amend Pam 1 3e. 00060 Vacaln.ova. en...Hinklabsera , S. a•sheen la ndscape dp arciZte •eita (ff.:A•intation Plaitlfj 4205 IOUs Am.14£.5.•102 Bollm,WA 1.007 OM BM-2426 , CWWWWIGOVeWs(1!5!) 1........vicsephieta 20a..1 color plant* Poston Ime I ' 24. 2 gal cant Project Teem FROACT Wit.:AS PACIXCI=WM, °PAM ST:roe LZU:rii ,ererloca Is too,. DamIlle . 2 nal COWL 24.on. .0.MI XXX • k...‘,,,:-:1 Caul..shell. baled , we urn Kind.. ' 2 GaLece. 24./sc. LIAII:I.*,IMO Ri.555SY-"""''ft' Liitheine Peresse. 2 rte.*. 24.cc. 2 gel com .•...- r,.,,,:I-- eode.1 Lann Design . • ikvckeil nin s LANDSCAPE PLAN-STREET FRONTAGE AND PARKWAY SCALE: 1..20 C)- Existing Tram - dr Tree PriMilrVallkie Plan LI.3/or ilesacia•end eas L1.1 • i 200019 . . F II o • to- =: N •!i'f.:l q o I i C. 4--) 0 I ielj I II ,;1;4 4 1 IlilEll_n • " .:dcc 1 is.i i. I �J.R W U lcr) N It 0 UPPER PATIO-PLANTINGS AND HARDSCAPE 1.' Y V) I; ;.: lZ CI R • a § PAW _PA1T9M WASIMM'j:�� .. '4§� • :♦ 'i% 1-• HARDSCAPE LAYOUT-PEDESTRIAN LINKAGE Project Team MAR LEEK KS SCALP 118•v 1' MKT MCKIM Can%BY:UK Marl TWO FOU�/TWO SIX. M 0403n BY m londacope arch.lecture•e8e development•lnigation planning/fi elrt:II.-WW.•,s,�....,loco 1165 INtA Are.NE. Weaeru Se 102 B •.WA 93007 (425)831-2426 •-e 00.velopment +. L1.2 1 200019 Steve Taylor-Lande Feed Store Project Page 1_, MI5 rnef - 6-0 - I-TI From: "Aaron & Lynda" <mcluen@home.com> To: <staylor@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 2/5/01 8:59PM Subject: Lande Feed Store Project Mr. Taylor, I raised the issue of the likely substantial rodent population that resides in the feed store several months ago with Greg Zimmerman, and I believe he forwarded it to you. I just want to reiterate my deep concern about what the implicaitons may be for the surrounding community if the mice and rats (and even cats) are not properly exterminated or in the case of cats caught prior to and during the demolition of the feed store. I also think it would be great if the City can provide any assistance to residents in the area to seal up their homes prior to demolition. I fully support the project, and merely want to help ensure that the developers act responsibly. Another concern I have is that I notice on the City website the project calls for removal of two underground tanks. Do you know what is or was in these? I am guessing that since no Environmental Impact Statement is required, nothing toxic is present, but l would sure like to know what they are going to be digging up. I also would be interested to hear of any timeline you are aware of for the project. I have always had great response from city officials and look forward to hearing from you soon. Thank you, Aaron McLuen 117 Burnett PI. S Renton, WA 98055 (425)277-8595 mailto:mcluen@home.com CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: February 7, 2001 TO: Jan Illian ''" Y FROM: Bob Mahn " SUBJECT: 95 Burnett Avenue South(aka Lande Feed) Transportation Systems Division staff have reviewed the Traffic Impact Analysis (dated November 29, 2000) for the subject proposed development project, and have the following comments. • Even though the AM peak traffic period was not analyzed, site traffic was assigned to the alley and South Tobin Street north of the project site rather than 100% of site traffic to the South 2°aBurnett Avenue South intersection, and discussion of the nearby Transit Center operations and impact on the 2002 Horizon Year volumes was not included, the information provided adequately addresses our concerns regarding this proposed development. Therefore, the Traffic Impact Analysis is acceptable. • We concur with the recommended traffic impact mitigation measures (payment of the City's Transportation Mitigation Fee and frontage improvements along Burnett Avenue South per City Code requirements and Renton standards). • We also concur with the proposal (included in the Project Description) to provide pedestrian connections between the site and a walkway adjacent to the westside park and between Burnett Avenue South and the westside park. cc: Nick Afzali H:\DIVISION.S\TRANSPOR.TAT\PLANNING\RLM\REVIEWS\Lande Feed.doc\jj City ofRe.ca:i Department of Planning/Building/Public b'-.._s ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Po lice, COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 30, 2001 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-171,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 15,2001 APPLICANT: PDSK PROPERTIES, INC. PROJECT MANAGER: Steve Taylor PROJECT TITLE: 95 Burnett Project WORK ORDER NO: 78773 LOCATION: 73,77 and 95 Burnett Avenue South SITE AREA: 1.3 acres(56,557 sq.ft.) BUILDING AREA(gross): 152,021 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The proposed project will include the demolition of Lande Feed Mill and several other small commercial buildings located onsite to construct a four-story apartment structure containing 118 dwelling units. The first floor will contain structured parking with 164 stalls. Vehicular access is via Burnett Avenue South. The property is zoned Center Downtown (CD). The proposed project will include thinning trees in the adjacent park and the addition of a small plaza to create pedestrian connections to Burnett Avenue South and to the building lobby area. Additionally,the project will remove two underground storage tanks. One tank is located onsite;the other is located just off-site on park property. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet Jo 9 OF-5 annw 16p B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or. areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Dire o r Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 PROJECT LUA-00-168-, SA-H, ECF 95 Burnett Project City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET (Continuation) POLICE RELATED COMMENTS 109 Police Calls for Service Estimated Annually CONSTRUCTION PHASE Theft from construction sites is one of the most common reported crimes in the city. To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site will need security lighting and any construction trailer should be completely fenced in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective thief and will demonstrate that this area is private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked when not in use, and should also have a heavy-duty deadbolt installed with no less then a 1-1/2" ' throw when bolted. Glass windows in the trailer should be shatter-resistant. I also recommend the business post the appropriate"No Trespassing" signs on the property while it's under construction(flier attached). This will aid police in making arrests on the property after hours if suspects are observed vandalizing or stealing building materials. COMPLETED BUILDING Each unit should have solid core doors,preferably metal or metal over solid wood with peepholes and heavy-duty dead bolt locks. The bolts need to be at least 1-1/2"in length when extended and installed with 3"wood screws. Lower unit sliding windows, including glass patio doors,will need additional locks; these locks will need to secure the panes from being pried out of the frames vertically. This means the locks will need to be placed into the top or bottom of the frames, in addition to any lock that limits horizontal movement. Alarm systems are recommended for each unit. Solid walls in any stairway or decking should be avoided; this would serve to limit the visibility and provide a place for a criminal to hide while waiting for a resident to return home. Each unit should have their individual unit numbers listed clearly with the numbers at least 6"in height of a color that contrasts with the color of the building and preferably placed under a light. This will also aid police or medics in finding the individual(s) that needs emergency assistance. Page 1 of 2 PROJECT LUA-00-168-, SA-H, ECF 95 Burnett Project City of Renton Department of Planning/ Building/ Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET (Continuation) Proper lighting in the parking area at this complex will be especially important. The additional lighting will assist residents in feeling safer traveling to and from their vehicle and it will also help protect the vehicles that will be parked at these locations. Landscaping in and around the exterior of the property should not be too dense or high. It is important to allow visibility. Too much landscaping will give the property the look of a fortress and make the residents feel isolated, and could also possibly give a burglary sufficient coverage to break into an apartment. Page 2 of 2 I.!!!. Trespass Dims Enforcement :.WATCH • Quite often, business owners and managers are faced with crimes that occur on the property after the businesses are closed and the employees have gone home. Some of the crimes that occur are burglary, vandalism, graffiti, trespassing, drug dealing and robbery in the parking lots. There is a way for police and business owners to discourage these types of crimes from taking place on private property, and that is by enforcing the City of Renton's Municipal Trespass Code 6-18-10. In order for police to be able to make an arrest for Trespass, business owners or managers need to purchase signs and display them in conspicuous areas on the property. These signs need to include the following language: 1. Indicate that the subject property is privately owned and; 2. Uninvited presence on the specified property is not permitted during the hours the business is closed, and; 3. Violators will be subject to criminal sanctions pursuant to Renton City Code 6-18-10. MOST IMPORTANTLY-THE SIGNS SHOULD BE CONSPICUOUS FROM ALL POSSIBLE POINTS OF ENTRY TO THE PROPERTY,AND ALSO BE PLACED ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDINGS. This way when a suspect is arrested, he/she will not be able to claim as a defense that he/she did not know he or she was trespassing. EXAMPLES FOR TRESPASS SIGNS: NO TRESPASSING NO TRESPASSING This is private property. Persons without specific No Trespassing after business hours business are not authorized to be on the premises between (insert specific times). Anyone on the the hours of(insert the hours your business is closed). premises after business hours is subject to Violators are subject to arrest and/or citation for criminal arrest and/or citation for Criminal Trespass pursuant to Renton City Code#6-18-10.. Trespass and/or impoundment of vehicle. Per Renton City Code#6-18-10. By enforcing the Trespass Ordinance, business owners and police will be sending a message to criminals that they are not allowed to conduct criminal activity on the property. In making arrests for Trespass, police may be preventing the more serious crimes from taking place. r COURTESY OF RENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT • CRIME PREVENTION UNIT -N 235 - 2571 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Vvoncs ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:DEPARTMENT:Co vet tut:.ltcrN Sewl(CS COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 30, 2001 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-171,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 15,2001 APPLICANT: PDSK PROPERTIES, INC. PROJECT MANAGER: Steve TaylorCr Y OF RENTON PROJECT TITLE: 95 Burnett Project WORK ORDER NO: 78773 LOCATION: 73,77 and 95 Burnett Avenue South .IAA9 1 3 2001 SITE AREA: 1.3 acres(56,557 sq.ft.) BUILDING AREA(gross): 152, 1 salt v SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The proposed project will include the demolition of Lande Feed Mill and several other small commercial buildings located onsite to construct a four-story apartment structure containing 118 dwelling units. The first floor will contain structured parking with 164 stalls. Vehicular access is via Burnett Avenue South. The property is zoned Center Downtown (CD). The proposed project will include thinning trees in the adjacent park and the addition of a small plaza to create pedestrian connections to Burnett Avenue South and to the building lobby area. Additionally,the project will remove two underground storage tanks. One tank is located onsite;the other is located just off-site on park property. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS f , c ' 9 7 Fe, I(o w t( ccc=/,li �h oP2�arcr C� Scvr ( S rcror We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. / zit a I Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING MEMORANDUM DATE: January 29,2001 TO: Steve Taylor FROM: Owen Denniso SUBJECT: 95 Burnett Project The site is designated Center Downtown in the Comprehensive Plan. The proposal is consistent with the following applicable Downtown Element policies. Objective DT-A: Create a balance of land uses which contribute to the revitalization of downtown Renton while fulfilling the requirements of an Urban Center as defined by countywide policies. Policy DT-1. There should be a mix of uses, including retail, office, light industrial and residential, which generate the demand for goods and services. Policy DT-3. Development and redevelopment of Center Downtown should strive for urban density and intensity of uses. Policy DT-5. Redevelopment of the downtown area should be encouraged to maintain and revitalize the downtown core. Policy DT-22. Maximize the use of existing urban services and civic amenities and revitalize the City's downtown by promoting medium to high density residential development in the downtown area. Allowed densities will conform to the criteria for Urban Centers in the countywide policies. Policy DT-24. Net residential development densities in the downtown area should achieve a range of 25- 100 dwelling units per acre. Where parcels are less than one half acre no minimum density is required. Policy DT-25. A density bonus allowing up to 150 units per acre may be granted subject to design review and consistent with relevant ordinances and land use regulations. Policy DT-27. Medium-rise residential(6-10 stories)should be located within the urban center, primarily between the Cedar River and South 2nd, and between South 7th and the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way. The area between South 7th and the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way should include a combination of low- (1-5 stories) and medium-rise residential to provide a transition between the employment area and the mixed use core. Policy DT-28. Unusual attributes of the downtown- cultural opportunities, views, historic development pattern, mix of uses,proximity to the river and transportation amenities-should be used to site residential uses downtown. 6 Policy DT-29. Parking should be structured whenever feasible and serve more than one use. Policy DT-42. Pedestrian spaces should be emphasized and connected throughout the downtown. Policy DT-44. Strong visual linkages should be created between downtown Renton and neighborhoods using landscaped arterial streets and connectors. Policy DT-47. Parking lots and structures should employ and maintain landscaping and other design techniques to minimize the visual impacts of these uses. Objective DT-G: Improve the visual and physical appearance of buildings to create a more positive image for downtown. Policy DT-48. Site and building designs (e.g. signage; building height, bulk and setback; landscaping;parking) should reflect unity of design to create a distinct sense of place and mitigate adverse impacts on adjacent uses. Policy DT-54. Downtown development, especially residential, should be designed to take advantage of existing amenities such as the Cedar River, city parks and trails. cc: Betty Nokes \\CENTRAL\SYS2\DEPTS\FINANCE\ECON_DEV\EconomicDevelopment\STRATPLN\PLANNING\GREEN-F\95Burnett.doc\od s c , City of Rentbn Department of Planning/Building/Public Vvorrs ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Pyre_ ('rL-PJVVhr m COMMENTS DUE: JANU Y r c 1 '•• li M APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-171,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUAY _".ti APPLICANT: PDSK PROPERTIES, INC. PROJECT MANAGER: Steven/tor PROJECT TITLE: 95 Burnett Project WORK ORDER NO: 78773 JAN 1 6 2001 i LOCATION: 73,77 and 95 Burnett Avenue South CITrUF ritN i UN SITE AREA: 1.3 acres(56,557 sq.ft.) I BUILDING AREA(gross): 152,021 sq.iF RE DEPARTMENT SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The proposed project will include the demolition of Lande Feed Mill and several other small commercial buildings located onsite to construct a four-story apartment structure containing 118 dwelling units. The first floor will contain structured parking with 164 stalls. Vehicular access is via Burnett Avenue South. The property is zoned Center Downtown (CD). The proposed project will include thinning trees in the adjacent park and the addition of a small plaza to create pedestrian connections to Burnett Avenue South and to the building lobby area. Additionally,the project will remove two underground storage tanks. One tank is located onsite;the other is located just off-site on park property. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet tyt 14,000 Feet /00 /11/4 ®l' Xp7r '6 .Q d -}el . V B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS Am. • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS s.e..e__ neA, .!, c Lr wi,n e 42 We have r lowed this application with articular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas whe additional information is ed to properly assess this proposal. O _ 17 / Si§natu e of Director or Authorize Represe tive Date Rou'ng Rev.10/93 A • TY O 116 ® CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU �N�O MEMORANDUM DATE: January 18, 2001 TO: Steve Taylor, Senior Planner I/ FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal ti ` SUBJECT: 95 Burnett Project, 95 Burnett Av. S MITIGATION ITEMS; 1. A fire mitigation fee of$45,784.00 is required based on $388.00 per Unit. FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. The preliminary fire flow is 5250 GPM, one hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structure and five additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. 2. Separate plans and permit are required for the installation of fire alarm and sprinkler systems. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Atrpo ii COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 30, 2001 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-171,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 15,2001 APPLICANT: PDSK PROPERTIES, INC. PROJECT MANAGER: Steve Taylor PROJECT TITLE: 95 Burnett Project WORK ORDER NO: 78773 LOCATION: 73,77 and 95 Burnett Avenue South SITE AREA: 1.3 acres(56,557 sq.ft.) BUILDING AREA(gross): 152,021 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The proposed project will include the demolition of Lande Feed Mill and several other small commercial buildings located onsite to construct a four-story apartment structure containing 118 dwelling units. The first floor will contain structured parking with 164 stalls. Vehicular access is via Burnett Avenue South. The property is zoned Center Downtown (CD). The proposed project will include thinning trees in the adjacent park and the addition of a small plaza to create pedestrian connections to Burnett Avenue South and to the building lobby area. Additionally,the project will remove two underground storage tanks. One tank is located onsite;the other is located just off-site on park property. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary • Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Lighf/Glare . Plants - Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities • Animals Transportation Environmental Health X Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet yes 14,000 Feet — B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS The construction of 118 dwelling units just east of the center- line of the airport is of concern, given the increasing number of complaints concerning aircraft noise. The determination of compatibility is a requirement not implemented by the Airport. • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS The City Code addresses height hazards, height restrictions, glare from lights and communication disturbances. The review to determine compliance with the City Code is necessary. The Airport does not implement this portion of the City Code. We have reviewed this lication with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas w ei e. additional i fo mation is needed to properly assess this proposal. -�ide jdit, ? 2®®t Signatu of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 „Ii--.---./ ., \c::) A E 01, 11'CT% , _ :::::::-.1.:_:E:::_::_::::::::::::E:3_::-E::::- .All (N irliii:' ''.. . 1. 7 ; . ;111 t,5;131 , , s ... __________________________________________ . _______________________ ...„ . ..._______________:_,....„_:_,_,_,_:_„____ '.A' =--=---- ikipr- :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::-------- - ill ilig ili: i Fin IF ' ::::::::: -::::::::::::::-:-:-:-:-:-H-:-:::::-=1_-_-::::: --1:if-fsr -1.-------------flifililil I 11 4 OR• g Ai 7 _L.!, \ 'C' 1 ----"S--:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-.7-.7.-:-:- ____:_:_:_:_:_:_:____ _::::::-:-:- :-::-.7-:-:::::::::-:-:-.:-:-:-:-:-i i .: 1 , ,„ e2171-1-Gg NiAii ==== _ _==__ ___ ' iciz--=__ + _ __=====-= ==-= == sue .+ r ern_ = _==_ ,.a 1117\ ! .te ar ii limn 19 \ '= "c •_asam lipt 4--- � ______ _--=- = • tl'_p,1F__viiiwv/_l ��` t 1 , .-. �._ b <1 \ ._ti, R":. _ �I 1 � �_ aid ---------- -- •.- Ei a Y,.I . . • c, \ , , A 1 B ::: .•,;•9” • ,E. ' \ ,6,......Cats..,, .a . IU__.D ,L.7. 1 .ftn --:::.::=K:E2:24:.::::.:.:::::E::_f:-::_:::_f:::]::-...71:-7:1-.]:.:_f_.:..]::::::::::: _::::E::::::::::E:E:: . Lt... . ,„ __ ipil._ r) pi isum- EL.Y hn o _ _ =-------- _----- - 1 Kay rl®1 1.111M1111. w A 1 f + 1. ,aisit� e- 6 #\,,,,4,i. . =__=_== =__ _ =====-=_ = __=____ ,�, ,► ,,. ..j ► ��o, ___- -___-- ---. _ - _--- Elivap t 1 it : .�l , .-' rreP a ivL�J©—cr-•'L7JCB� _- wlirwv ®� - �G� �r d Il Irr. ©(1 Of •61f� ^ air —% I,-A.lid�o. ' 0 nr IPAntry-4_,,:,11:.,;,- ,:- �' 'LE ra w t L \ 1!�' .... '01:11112.! 'rPRIi4 r �DLIA��©air ?: • 1 ► K4" .*. ! ��Y 1 -ate =� DA —moo ..�, ._. �Qr. ! f,T. rip#gn � 3 P jr� 41•116 . AN.,_, . -- -.!1 -_ _. •-•4 QQQ+++aaa•••'.,.^JJJiti g!4 I.� a �,.1- Will 11112 114 4-6 -/ tr 64. r;4SA � 1j t arm ,...1. - Air_(-_- ,, NRI 4a ,pik J16 PIP !Ile. r 1 ii/IHAlli B4.011 1-- cif_ i,„ - _ Ili ‘4.1 :5: I A:„...,,, .;,..r..or.- itil"—lig ow Er � ,kittyy 1 • �®� `/•�. .. �� ,'� �lt�� ��1� +Vrl MwY o .is�g 71- 1Q ©•�'�`P/4 4 I is ii �r 0.��I �,, r- 4- -- J �,,. ��al -R+ tr �r' ;`�,+`�`� �1�1frIT� ., 'm • .-:T�''r`"sfl�l 9 s O�`Pu I 7 .1...- m- -- -if 44 Ve7Z,_Z.-VI:,DT_Ignigli TS -�, . . '''. .keif&,_ tr !!!,i g A* 1113 Pa 1.„IA J. ,44. . vi r_lcia L IT . (I Igo mo.p.v.: iii ; i dige'N....N‘TN.,, .. _11 JZ .814(4t, tate. __6._. 1fi fDI‘°?-._-K.1 .-1 1 M igon.,a,00,„j.c oInI I j.I..P„r..'ei•. A 6 /, ,,,,,...1,,,.1.41...,,, - 11 i,r;g,II-_II,,o.A p 4_.w,,.„ . ,._,.:.”1C\A.\,'_...,,II%IIIrIt_,,_ \7p-t 4i r•, --,:e„„..i,fi A ll". rr ` ° `- j 7.i 7•..._,.V4., , cr, 1 „in ,„„.. . . ___... ,L1.74,......._. _ ,.vollyii_isp_ ,..... :op,. iii.---. ../ A04 CA , :IX‘',f.l•4,_.%. 1 . _Ii 11.t•_11:_l..i_.1_ F14.1i.4_i. .,.. - \. .). . 1 (4'WA.', 4,4p11a11-.,1 . - jW II1ja : J; �\1 i i " I . ,.-- __:. 1 ... r... 3 ., , � liticct,— [i Po JCJo ry % 6.442" 0'4/1.... \ `s. ,,.\\7%6 3 I ___04 1 s\`\I r 1 y �i ♦ �� its .L < z . z < i. - .r �' 1 • 1 I \`. '� w�' i Q�ItF �i 3 l T \ 1 \ — ' Q r s. eiµ \-K ►. ...s 1. I H/ �\ �\ h�„ki a .i _� :' 1 IlrOg • !, .7 • J 't A a" \• • -• \ A.•v. f_ f yy,� .ate �`�i _ rn+ 1. ,o, ., , ,... . .....4.:„.......:toja. N. a� L. _ r.,j y���`{ \ \ (U r,,n +11 �YJhG awl �1 PC. n .9: to I 1 :•., • (4k .!� I fiy4"4: ' • �A - 'r 1. t_ a[� t29s0 r 7 f'Ir jj--1 NN ;kill . - ,i.twol if': 1 \ N., • "47•Ig 4xt\i {-�1 kf_e 1: ti� • \ .4rim•,, , 4., I 1 0 a . N' E •..,Is; _AL:St-4 liti ,00 , %N. .10 Jo ` cos".,,,,,, •Y4+ .J • � 4e �ID .� LC a t�^' ' ' 46. , ° _.„do ° • • I • ••\ / a �• _T— N r . , 41 . b I 7� ` r a , cQ- • rt� Ay ).10 \ 69 I I le re. {d ti rr • �.-,.�1:i j.• �I ''ma .D�,�` r 4# L R I't�,�i 4 W 116 ll% a V }p' •'' � n >� 1 ?!Q"i�G.. ' 0'V''.• > .. 'T.' �� it �I' .yam 'r y 't 40 ., Q' '0• 6 4 is i 1 `�Y�' • I ' ;;,i• oiv I' • -t '��.o'y p - 4� , :' 1 [,_---•Ts- — -Ite�r r.....r.• 0 le �-• - .. aIIII1(1 4 . t� a w 4 b°°' `> .r1'1•A 9.•nf't - 1 �' • , r•• j1�N c a• m., 1• its' 1 %Ir vni Fi '" ,s Iy o t v�^ D. . . r Ae$ S ;e i•r•ro .» _ �Q� , E k ® 'o Leo' • 1 eta,...• . .t �` c`\ t Jf I a ' �1�' 4 ,11 I4 M ��� '(.....1117 .5• ZI4. `\W I a 4 Y AV' a *•'V' Z 'I !1 "��.. �PG r Y Ltt 011s %: Z 5 .° ..1, • 3 a it'. t /t.om • I► 6 •tr m„. ;s I /4; i g w--4-® _ 61�4 . > e et• 2 f o wr' $ M 4!�`' Tom" ` °s ow soil,. 1. J "I-- 1 -4:—-3- -1 ,t r 11 ,. ;.,1 tQ ,Ir 9 �. W 0 is t4 �. ate r'8• 3 eta r•sp • 8J. 1ye'�19 • iS .'o la 3 r,,, ' r11>p e = PAT • 2• •� P .t`4'e4 A 11 t, I t` N15 i�♦ +p Ip .1 60 W1,0 t . r•q ; 81/• i t �' h s.,.a I y 41 rue ,•,•e'��... 10 / � t rr n a4 iv s rap 19�T rt� u1 )r /0f s 'L &IG 1aa 1 to • 1- r•t.nn.ic .a .11 rasa aL.... '� �' • J.e.to ZNO st s w... _ ..; et� 8i1i�fi�I1lR uut !!•' • - ,1.0 o Go is ' 'w' T t o •I 17 ",t, ii�4�; X 1,s. a . f AtI 4 1 p 20h 1 I 204 1t 1 "p 9f I 4.1 �°, fi41 VI: s, r e � s// 7 �i.�1,l`; 18 • ii Inill tl+°' , �' 1' .i' eh r ( �• 4 2 a I YNoe 19 , z +•1'�P rjp,h , O f• 1` 1 • ,La ,a 1+ s • •) - .. It M I f P G, : 7 /t t s 4i : SO. 18 ' . 3 i 06 : '',�0 18• • 3 g'17-v,° opoiP18 ' ej A. 'gioda•ot dei ib most 6, .,�.�►%Y4• ` . 4 +.i .I, . 17' W\ a 6144 : e,17. N1' 4. 4' JIM wa A . _`t4' •B;ert�r OA he 1 . s r.4a' I'1!SI' IR` 4 = 9 OP re. u , tiocie,,4 23 k Q L 1 At a. A. iIrI�4 •,!'�%r, r -` 25 .. �� 4 . . 13 .. .1 . j City of Renron Department of Planning/Building/Public V14)rss ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT- APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Ipwwv\ld.patti SL'J1NtL S COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 30, 2001 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-171,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 15,2001 APPLICANT: PDSK PROPERTIES, INC. PROJECT MANAGER: Steve Taylor • PROJECT TITLE: 95 Burnett Project WORK ORDER NO: 78773 • LOCATION: 73,77 and 95 Burnett Avenue South SITE AREA: 1.3 acres(56,557 sq.ft.) I BUILDING AREA(gross): 152,021 sq`ft:'`. • SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The proposed project will include the demolition of Lande Feed Mill and several other small:commercial buildings located onsite to construct a four-story apartment structure containing 118 dwelling units. The first floor will contain structured parking with 164 stalls. Vehicular access is via Burnett Avenue South. The property is zoned Center Downtown (CD). The proposed project will include thinning trees in the adjacent park and the addition of a small plaza to create pedestrian connections to Burnett Avenue South and to the building lobby area. Additionally,the project will remove two underground storage tanks. One tank is located onsite;the other is located just off-site on park property. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing -Air Aesthetics Water Recreation Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS Q/24" 1-1/(3d/r"7/ 1/C4 /-°1 1/,do. C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ,` /2 jAev-a, 0V-be_ 4-0 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional informatio needed to pro edy assess this proposal , CV425 Signature of !rector or Au onzed Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS 1. Sheet L1.3, Tree Retention Plan —After visiting the park site, this plan sheet does not accurately reflect the existing park plantings. The quantity, locations and species are inaccurate. Recommend a site survey to accurately reflect what currently exists. 2. Sheet L1.3, Tree Retention Plan — Planting Group #35 is not to be removed. These trees and any others not impacted by construction are to remain in place. 3. Sheet L1.3, Tree Retention Plan — Recommend the applicant have a Certified Arborist evaluate all existing trees on the park property and submit a report with recommendations to include at a minimum, the following: a. Recommendations for trees to be removed due to significant construction impacts (identify by species and location). b. Recommendations for trees to remain (identify by species and location). c. Recommendations for trees to remain in place with a description of precautionary measures to be taken by the contractor to ensure tree survival (identify by species and location). d. Recommendations for trees to be removed and relocated describing the method of removal/relocation and type of equipment. e. Recommendations for pruning trees. (crown and root). 4. Exact location of existing underground oil storage tank needs to be noted on the plans. Tank removal to be accomplished by the applicant as the tank served the applicant's property. Please note: This location will likely impact the arborist report regarding what trees should be removed, relocated and retained and will also impact any future landscape improvements (including irrigation, sidewalk replacement, electrical, etc.) necessitated by the tank removal. 5. Sheet L1.1 — Landscape Plan The proposed courtyard/landscape improvements "Privatize" the public park space. These improvements create an elaborate grand entry to the new apartment complex from and through the park. The courtyard will be perceived by the public as a private entry for the apartment complex and will not be utilized by the public. Recommend retaining the current/existing park landscape concept and carrying this concept throughout the areas impacted by tank removal, utility construction and building construction 6. Should the applicant desire a point of access from the west to the apartment complex, a single concrete walk can be considered with the exact location/design to be coordinated with the Parks Department. Recommend that any formal landscaping be situated on the applicant's property. This could be accomplished by moving back the building façade. 7. Sheets A5.3 and A5.4 North and South building Elevations —The building roofline extends 3' over the property line into the park property. The roofline needs to be modified or the building moved back from the property line. 8. Existing sewer easement through the park property needs to be abandoned when sewer line is re-located to the south. 9. Recreation trail easement needs to be recorded on the applicant's property for trail connection on the north side of the building. 10. Clarification is needed on the status of the existing 4' high galvanized chain link park fence located on the property line. 11. It is anticipated that the proposed development would generate future residents that would utilize existing City park and recreation facilities and programs. The City has adopted a Parks Mitigation Fee of$354.51 per each new multi family unit to address these potential impacts." • ENT: . ::::: :: :;:::: ::'::::::::::::: :::::<: :;: ::';:';::::;: ::'::::; :::'; IY: 1 t PMENT::SERVICES DiVIS:ION ::::::::: ;LIST F SUt R C DlN • PR PERT W ER : :: ::::::::::: :: :<,.: • .::;:.,;,.;...within • PROJECT NAME: 9 5 5u rnek-I; Fro 1Gct APPLICATION NO: LUG ' 00 �'"I I , SIA.-9 E't , �[ The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME • ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S1PARCEL • NUMB1 R • //42(1.) D"' ELOPMENT PLANNING I CITY OF RENTON \h• • DEC 2 1 2000 ECE�VE® • • • • N'• (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) A ' Scan I King (WA) Parcel Number Owner Name Site Address YB Owner Phone 000720 001205 Sherrill Les R 88 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 1904 000720 001304 Caniparoli Louis J 84 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 1924 425-226-2554 000720 001502 Miller Bertha *No Site Address*Renton 000720 001601 Provin William D 81 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 1922 425-255-7281 000720 001700 Tharp John Mullet J;Watanabe Arth 75 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 1901 000720 004100 Bonner Pyuong Su/Robert G Sr 518 S Tobin St Renton 98055 1900 000720 004308 Storwick Grace L/Russell E 59 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 1902 000720 004407 Austin Walter&Sharon 64 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 1958 253-531-1934 000720 004506 Dawson James D/Renee E 58 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 1976 206-772-4496 000720 005909 American Legion Post#19 55 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 1924 000720 007707 Stauff Richard J/Betty J 13813 139Th Ave SE Renton 98059 425-228-4085 000720 009604 Storwick R E 99 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 1924 000720 010404 Tennessee Group L.L.C. *No Site Address*Renton 1988 000720 010909 Tennessee Group L.L.C. . 91 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 1930 000720 011808 Cooper Robert T 87 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 1936 425-255-8098 000720 012202 Schmidt Margaret L 95 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 1937 000720.012806 Gudmunson Darreld J&Nancy L 513 S Tobin St Renton 98055 1977 425-228-0835 000720 013002 Anderson Robert L 81 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 1937 000720 013804 Meakin Violet 75 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 1939 206-772-2474 000720 013903 Tennessee Group L.L.C. 79 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 1939 000720 014000 Salvation Army 65 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 1985 000720 015403 Tennessee Group L L C 82 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 000720 015601 Tennessee Group L L C 7075 S Tobin St Renton 000720 021302 Housing Authority 51 Burnett Ave.S Renton 98055 1977 182305 926202 Burlington Northrn Santa Fe S 2 Burnett Renton 182305 926301 City Of Renton *No Site Address*Renton 569600 016509 Pringle Edith E 117 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 1900 425-255-3133 569600 016905 Kowing Terry L *No Site Address*Renton 425-254-1550 569600 017002 Kowing Terry L 109 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 1900 425-254-1550 569600 018000 Pan's Development Corporation 120 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 569600 018505 Kramer Robert W/Anita J 103 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 1938 425-226-3860 569600 019008 Knippel John P/Jackie D 97 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 1905 569600 021509 King Jerry M&Janice E 126 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 1958 253-630-7933 569600 022002 King Jerry M&Janice E 126 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 253-630-7933 569600 022507 Mcluen Aaron/Lynda 117 Burnett P1 S Renton 98055 1910 425-277-8595 569600 023505 Sigette Mary Lou 116 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 1902 425-228-8120 569600 024503 Bert Roberts J 113 Burnett P1 S Renton 98055 1900 569600 025005 Bird G Robert 108 Logan Ave S Renton 98055. 1902 206-772-2099 569600 025500 Gebenini Edo P;Struznik Kathleen 106 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 1904 425-255-4789 569600 026003 Stauff Richard J 100 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 1953 425-228-4085 569600 026102 Stauff Richard J/Betty J 96 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 1908 425-228-4085 569600 027506 Lande Philip M 107 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 1929 206-937-6851 569600 027605 Erue Donald C 101 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 1958 569600 027704 Kaercher Richard K 115 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 1920 722930 059505 Frasier Eugene A/Christine F Severy 43 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 1956 722930 060008* Heitman Ruby C;Heitman-Boden Sa 50 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 1922 425-255-8853 722930 061006 City Of Renton *No Site Address*Renton 722930 061501 Veness John Allen/Carol M 36 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 1949 722930 062509 Allingham Family Limited Partnersh 30 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 1953 722930 063002 Reynolds Glenn D 55 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 1925 425-204-9813 723150 203005 Mclendon Hardware Inc 104 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 1980 425-235-3555 723150 208509 Cugini Alex Jr 710 S 2Nd St Renton 98055 1981 425-255-1281 723150 212006 Tennessee Group Llc 111 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 1968 723150 212501 Storwick R E 115 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 1957 723150 213004 Storwick R E 101 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 1929 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable,But Is Not Guaranteed (Continued) • NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL ' .• NUMBER • • • • Applicant Certification • I. PprI,(L k'R 4,KO(,6 , hereby certify that th Iab,omelis,(4),o1,,altjggellt ra erty (Print Name) h1C�t�Py Public , owners and their addresses were obtained from: gtate tilt W�ahington :+ Title Company Records bA#21:9NE S:YOUNG 40 King County Assessors RecordsIth Ala bfll il*fltgiros Feb. 1,2002 AM111111i1► / Signed �i� Date /t/OD W (Applicant) NOTARY ATTESTED: Subscrib:' and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and f r the St to of tkiashington, residing at 7j0nni R on the /7 day of Ai en ' ; , 20(7O . • Signed (Notary Mc) C•i# -of •tentn.n:'Use......::;;::'.;:::::.::.;;::•'::' ::.:::::<>.;._:w.;:::;:.::::, :�;.::.;:.::;:.:;.<;.:;;::.: ... ........ ..:.:.:.:..::::::::.:.....................:..........:.. ...........:..:.:...:.:... :.:::..... . ..:......... ..... .......CERTIFICATION:bF��M/�1!»1.NG:'•;:.;:::':;a..:�:>;:'::•:4•�:'��`....:.>:>.: :;f:-'' ... ............. ............ .,i •Yp,o �:,ti, notices.:of the: ra y:::..:..:..:..... ..:: ..::..:.. . f� p.. ,.•gip:. ............:...:..:.. Yee ... . .....'.. ..... ..:.: :::>::::::.. ..::: .each>aisted:: ro eR ,(>.� . ..:.. ^.1;. 5# net D r tl ..:.:;::::::.;::::; NOTARY ':: :: ..:..:.............:..:... .....:.::.....:.:.:.::.::..: :Su.bscribed:;an.d;sworn:beforeiPublic ::i:n and for=the:State'of W: """ :n• r rY hingtan residing.: .:...,...:::::........:..:...::..:.... ., on the n day of l:jel - •.::: •.... •20 0 1 Iksiprop.doo .. REV 03/00 MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES.8-"`ZI ? • Proposed Mitigation Measures: _ y - _ _ _---- _ _ _—_—- t 1. The applicant shall comply with recommendans hithe Earth Consultant Inc.geotechnlcel study prepared for the site. - 2. All underground storage tanks associated with the development shall be removed and any soli contamination N.-NT° abated per Department of Ecology regulations prior to Issuance of a bulltling permit. - NOTICE OF APPLICATION 3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee equal to$388 per new multi-family unit. The Flre Mitigation Fee Is payable prior to Issuance of a building permit. AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- 4. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average daily trip associated with the SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS-M) project.The required mitigation shall be paid prior to issuance of a building permit. 5. The applicant shall pay a Parks Department mitigation fee of$354.51 per new multi-family unit. The required mitigation fee shell be paid prior to Issuance of a building permit. DATE: January 15,2001 Comments on the above application must be submitted In writing to Steve Taylor,AICP,Project Manager,Development LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-00.171,SA-1,ECF Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on february 6.2001.This matter is also tentatively scheduled fora public hearing on March 13.2001,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Seventh Floor,Renton City APPLICATION NAME: 95 BURNETT Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton.If you are Interested In attending the hearing,please contact the project will Include the demolition of Lends Feed MIII and several Development Services Division,(425)430.7282,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled.If comments PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed P 1 cannot be submitted in writing by the date Indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments other small commercial buildings located onslte to construct a four-story apartment structure containing 118 dwelling units. on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner.If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of The first floor will contain structured parking with 1e4 stalls.Vehicular access is via Burnett Avenue South.The property record and receive additional Information by mall,please contact the project manager.Anyone who submits written Is zoned Center Downtown(CD).The proposed project will Include thinning trees in the adjacent park and the addition of comments will automatically become a party of record end will be notified of any decision on this project. a small plaza to create pedestrian connections to Burnett Avenue South and to the building lobby area. Additionally,the project will remove two underground storage tanks. One tank Is located onsite;the other Is located just off-site on park property. CONTACT PERSON: STEVE TAYLOR(425)430.7219 PROJECT LOCATION: 73,77 and 95 Burnett Avenue South • PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS,M):As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project.Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a - -•n t• `+• .��/v • 2 P DNS-M Is likely to be Issued.Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are Integrated into a single 1) 4 ' • ,fi• ,p y,, comment period.There will be no comment period following the Issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non- m„ ._is:,.+;::_..r. j ', o• Significance Mitigated(DNS-M).A 14-day appeal period will follow the Issuance of the DNS-M. -y■ G■„w+\•y 1 ;M /�, • N'WI+,1■y„ , r. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: December 21,2000 l�^ !4�!: I.' y` , ,..I,=IF F„I ta `1012>•. .,` NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION; January 15,2001 .,1r6�s..1 krd�1I` - ;i" Nir -°'}'a Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Hearing Examiner Site Plan Approval. 'Ilgiilump o.,r `- .�ry• `_ .... - q Other Permits which may be required: Demolition Permits,Construction Permit,Building Permit,Underground i'11llin51 Ur rUidd .2 f• �qqqsss\000 e w I Wilma*• Storage Tank Removal Permits. x , n TI A 1 I Requested Studies: Geolechnical engineering report,traffic Impact analyses,surface water 4) + I �� a• • ' ,, v-' i drainage analysts. • �"1"V. 'r `I, r"! 5 ' FFFIII��� Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, - Y,�' N. •` •/0 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 - ..• • ''''.1 1 1• �" • ✓ PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing scheduled for March 13,2001 before the Renton Hearing i✓.••Y : �t 74•t y F. *�'F;%' Examiner in Renton Council Chambers.Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on the 7th c .`�,,( floor of the now Renton City Hall located at 1055 Grady Way South. L I I �` '� VA% are, SA `• .•di,I ) gyp✓ ,, '"C CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: .N /� esti 9- i,.tom' r _•r y _: � -- ., . Land Use: Center Downtown(CD) w, tgii as 4 f , Environmental Documents that r WA RAM il.�. `,4 ',�d(r�r. . �_t _, ' •► Evaluate the Proposed Project: Traffic Impact Analysis,Geotechnical Engineering Study,Drainage Technical ! I �' Information Report end the Environmental Checklist. • tAS'1t Q(C~]0 g' �R` a1le� _.,4.-1 a- tr y ll Environmental Associates,Inc.report dated February 10,2000,Subsurface ,�� 1�• ��� ° "r ` / • -CM �q1 MC 'Mien 1 e.. it=*.,in Sampling&Testing. 5111 SW" )wig@ . 4s�y, dew Geotech Consultants,Inc.report dated May 28,1999,Underground Storage Tank G � �• a`•��, E1�1 . , - �.'�, Location and Soil Sampling. .•.• -Orpli , .- Development Regulations a •Z p1 d•,•',,r F F$t)r ;i a* Aid '-b • immix" Used For Project Mitigation: The project will be subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance,Cityof Renton Municipal �Zi� y��[D - 1/�' ��R'"fl r�@ i �� ^°, ' J:. g P 1 1 N P "'�IfI'. .. '�'. �JG/lG IC, 1 y -6-.r•" r 4,• Code,Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,King County Surface Water °n.� (t 11 t � :.y l� ° •1^• ••it�G„_, Design Manual and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. .-- NOTICE OF APPLICATION NOTICE OF APPUCATION - CERTIFICATION • I, /1I t,cL ve, T)Q. 7c,„c ), hereby certify that S copies of the above document were posted by me in 3conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on ,) ,„1,, . \3 'z i Signed: r �l ..4011P, • ATTEST: Subcribed m before me,a Norte Public,in and for the tate o Washington residing` ,7 , on the .nd day of )AA 26 / p.....4-r „..n..t r'r -rc.,_,a..-..w..-„a.. 4 MARILYN KAMCHEFF �5 � � NOTARY PUBLIC r 45 '? STATE OF WASHINGTON �f COMMISSION �[� � EXPIRES JUNE 29, 2003 , , .1,,' d .► CITY (_ ' RENTON ,LL ,. Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor • Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator • • • January 15,2001 • Mr. Kent Smutny Thomas-Harkey Architects • • 13400 Northup Way#30 Bellevue,WA 98005 • SUBJECT: 95 Burnett Project . Project No. LUA-00-171,SA-H,ECF Dear Mr. Smutny: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton.has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and,therefore, is accepted for review. • It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environrriental Review Committee on February 6, 2001: Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. • A Public Hearing is has been tentatively scheduled to•be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City.Hall, 1055 South. Grady Way, Renton, Washington, on March 13, 2001 •at 9:00 AM to consider the proposed Site Plan: The.applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. If the Environmental Determination'is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. Please contact me, at(425)430-7219, if you have any questions. Sincerely, 06 /01 • Steve Taylor,AICP Senior Planner cc: Mr. &Mrs. Starkovich/Owners Mr. Philip Lande/Owner PDSK Properties, Inc. • • • • Acceptance 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 C. This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer Pok PROPERT1F , INCI January 11, 2001 Y O OF RED NN 1�G Mr. Steve Taylor DEVE Senior Planner Development Services Division 30 12 2001 1055 S Grady Way • Renton,WA 98055 REC ND RE: 95 Burnett Project U Dear Mr. Taylor: Enclosed are the items you requested for the 95 Burnett Housing Project. Environmental Associates, Inc. completed the subsurface investigation and Geotech Consultants, Inc. prepared the underground storage tank report. Also enclosed are the pages to the Environmental Checklist that have been revised. Sh• your office need anything else, please call. iiiiiiiin war Pau ' akow Pre'a i ent Encl• ures: Pages 2& 6 of Environmental Checklist • Report by Environmental Associates, Inc. Report by Geotech Consultants, Inc. CC: Kent Smutny—Thomas Harkey Architects 0 One Pacific Building 621 Pacific Ave., #300 Tacoma, WA 98402-4611 , Office: (253) 627-4070 Fax: (253 627-4049 Rpr 22 02 04: 50p Law Offices �uecaYcu �� r• � CITY OF RENTON ( �11'\ APR 2 3 2002 � , RECEIVED 1 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE CITY OF RENTON 2 IN THE COURT OF THE HEARING EXAMINER OF THE CITY OF RENTON fv1/R 0 8 2002 3 CRAIG LANDE, ) 4 RECEIVED ) CITY CLERK'S OFFICE 5 Plaintiff, ) NO.: CO1-0275 6 ) ) STIPULATION OF PARTIES v. ) AS TO EXHAUSTION OF 7 CITY OF RENTON, ) ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES 8 AND ORDER TO DISMISS APPEAL ) 9 Defendant. ) ) ) 10 11 THE PARTIES to the above entitled action, by the undersigned attorneys, stipulate that the issu: 12 on appeal before the hearing examiner is no longer timely because the Defendant has lifted the abatemen 13 of the subject building so the subject of the appeal no longer applies to the Plaintiff's building. Th; 14 parties also stipulate that by filing the appeal before the hearing examiner, the Plaintiff has followed the 15 requisite administrative proceedings and has exhausted administrative remedies as they relate to the stor; 16 front and loading dock, such that any claim for damages against the Defendant may be filed with the Kin.. 17 County Superior Court. 18 19 DATED: / aOd,D� 2 0DAW P. VYV N 21 22 / awn P. Vyvyan, B No. 18405 23 Attorney for Pia' ff 24 LAWRENCE WARREN 25 ( i 2 6 wrence Warren, A o . Attorney for Defe ant City of en on Dawn P. Vyvyan STIPULATION OF PARTIES AS TO EXHAUSTION OF 200 First Avenue West ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL- 1 Suite 108 Seattle, WA 98119 (206) 628-3014 Apr 22 02 04: 50p Law Offices 2062848079 p. 3 • 2 ORDER 3 THIS MATTER coming on to be heard before the undersigned Hearing Examiner in the above 4 entitled court based upon the stipulation of the parties as to exhaustion of administrative remedies as the 5 relate to the store front and loading dock, and for dismissal, and the Court being fully advised in th; 6 premises, it is 7 ORDERED,ADJUDGED AND DECREED that plaintiff's appeal of the defendant City of Rento 8 actions, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs. 9 10 DONE IN OPEN COURT this day of Arj , 2002. a. 12 GL.. — 13 HEARING E 14 15 PRESENTED BY: 16 DAW P. VYV N 17 18 awn P. Vyvyan, S OS 19 2 0 Approved as to form & content notice of presentment waived: 21 22 AP ? grr awrence Warren, A #p 13> 23 Attorney for Defendant City of Renton 24 25 26 Dawn P. Vyvyan STIPULATION OF PARTIES AS TO EXHAUSTION OF 200 First Avenue West ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL-2 Suite 108 Seattle, WA 98119 (206)628-3014 (1 -lii ( aP July 9, 2001 Renton City Council Minutes50 t T r7 It Page 222 MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY PERSSON,COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Electronic mail was read from Cindy Williams, 3129 SE 5th St.,Renton, Citizen Comment: Williams— 98058,requesting that the use of fireworks be banned in the City of Renton. Fireworks Ban Ms. Williams questions the benefit the City derives from allowing fireworks and wonders why fireworks are still legal. Mayor Tanner commented that the use of fireworks on July 4th did not result in any significant fires, so the cost to the City this year was minimal. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Planning and Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a Planning& Development report regarding the preservation of the Lande Feed building. The Committee Committee discussed with the Renton Historical Society available resources for the Community Services: Lande relocation and preservation of the Lande Feed building. The Historic Society Feed Building Preservation was unable to identify any additional funding sources or options for the preservation of the building. Therefore,the Committee recommended no further action be taken on this matter. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Development Services: One Planning and Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a Valley Place Rezone,Removal report regarding the removal of restrictive covenants for Valley Medical of Restrictive Covenants (R- Center; covenant required for approval of One Valley Place Rezone(R-81- 81-047) 047). The Committee recommended concurrence with the staff recommendation to authorize the removal of restrictive covenants required as a condition of rezone of the subject property to P-1 (Public Use)in 1981. The covenants required that development of the site be limited to a Planned Unit Development subject to the Planned Unit Development regulations. The covenants are no longer relevant to present conditions surrounding the subject site and unduly encumber the property. Therefore,the Committee recommended allowing the applicants to proceed with removing the restrictive covenants from the land title. The Committee further recommended that the Council authorize the Administration to prepare any necessary documents for executing removal of the covenants. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Planning: Request for Zoning Planning and Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a Text Amend re Boat& report regarding recreational vehicle(RV)and boat storage. The Committee Recreational Vehicle Storage met on June 7th,25th, and July 9th,to review a property owner's request to add RV and boat storage to the list of uses allowed in the Commercial Arterial(CA) zone. • The Committee recommended that RV and boat storage be included in a revised definition of"Vehicle Storage"replacing the definition of"Storage Lot" in Title IV, Section 4-11-190,Definitions "S", as: "A specially designed,paved, and enclosed or partially enclosed area for parking or holding of operable motor vehicles, boats or wheeled equipment for more than seventy-two hours." • Board of Public Works • stet —00- 11 April 11, 2001 Page 2 Action: This item was tabled until the next meeting in order for the inspector's punch list items to be completed. • Excess Right-of-way Use Permit 95 Burnett Apartments,95 Burnett Ave. S. - Applicant requests a right-of-way use permit to allow roof overhangs which would create weather protection and a softer looking structure. Action: Moved by Meckling, seconded by Gray to grant an annual permit to allow roof overhangs into the city right-of-way, subject to the following conditions: 1) Prior to the issuance of a revocable permit,the applicant shall pay an annual nonrefundable permit fee of$90.72; and 2) Prior to the issuance of the revocable permit,the applicant shall provide a Certificate of Insurance for public liability not less than $100,000 per person and $300,000 per accident, and for property damage liability, not less than $50,000. The City of Renton shall be designated as additional insured. MOTION CARRIED. 4. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 9:00 a.m. RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON i9 2001 PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS FAMONCITYCOUNCE MEMORANDUM DATE: August 16,2001 ' TO: Dan Clawson,President City Council Members VIA: Mayor Jesse Tanner FROM: Neil Watts,X-7218 Ai('(, SUBJECT: Report on Lande Feed ACTION TAKEN Craig Lande was given approval to reoccupy the feed store portion of Lande Feed on Tuesday afternoon,August 7. The store was open to use by the general public beginning the following morning. We were able to grant this approval for limited occupancy of the building after three issues were resolved: 1. Correction by the property manager (Craig Lande) of the Fire Code violations which were determined to be life/safety violations. 2. Verification by visual inspection by a structural engineer that the feed store portion of the building was safe for use by the general public. 3. Demonstration by the property manager that the other portions of the building were secured and signed to keep the general public out of these areas. BACKGROUND An abatement action was taken on the Lande Feed building on June 15,2001. This action was based on structural deficiencies noted in parts of the overall building, significant life/safety fire code violations, and a concern for the structural integrity of the portion of the building housing the feed store. It was determined that the general public could not be allowed into the building until the property manager addressed these issues. Retail sales were allowed to continue outside of the structure from the loading dock and parking area. Since the abatement action, City staff has been in frequent contact with Craig Lande explaining what corrective measures were needed to allow customers into the feed store portion of the building. All parties recognized that there are structural failures in other portions of the overall building, including roof failures west of the feed store area and in the north portion of the building. Repairs of these failures would be expensive, and impractical given the future demolition plans for the building. The necessity of correcting the life/safety fire code violations in the building prior to any use of the building by the general public was also explained to Mr. Lande. Our continued concerns with the excess litter • August 16, 2001 Page 2 piled around the building, and the related enforcement action on these separate violations were also conveyed to Mr.Lande. Mr. Lande began work on correcting the fire code violations, removing the excess computer parts, etc. from the site, and implemented a successful program of restricting the general public from all portions of the building. At that time, we asked our structural consultant to perform a visual inspection of the feed store portion of the building to determine if this portion of the building was structurally sound and safe for use by the general public. This visual inspection was completed on July 9, 2001. The structural engineer then submitted a written report to the City (copy attached). The report stated in part that"based on our visual observations,the feed store area appeared to be structurally sound and safe for occupancy by the general public, provided that the second floor is not used for heavy storage or other use that would result in high loading conditions." We informed Mr. Lande of the results of the structural inspection at that time. He requested permission to open the feed store to the general public, and the request was denied pending completion of corrections of the life/safety fire code violations. On July 31, 2001, Mr. Lande requested an extension to his business reinspection for the fire code violations. He advised the Fire Prevention Bureau that he would be able to complete all required work within 20 days. A letter of extension was issued on August 1, 2001 granting the request for a 20-day extension. On August 2, 2001, Mr. Lande contacted the Fire Prevention Bureau to report that he had completed corrections on all of the life/safety fire code violations. A reinspection was completed on August 3, 2001. The inspection verified that the life/safety fire code violations had been corrected. A few housekeeping items still remain and a reinspection will be conducted after the 20-day extension period. The Fire Prevention Bureau then notified the Development Services Division that they had no objection to removing the"red tag" from the feed store portion of the building. After conferring with the City Attorney, the determination was made that the feed store could be reopened to the general public, subject to the continued condition that the rest of the building be properly signed for no admittance by the general public. The rest of the building is still subject to the abatement action, and will remain restricted in use unless significant structural repairs are undertaken. A verbal approval was given directly to Mr. Lande at the site on Tuesday, August 7, 2001. The store was reopened to the general public the following morning. The formal letter granting limited occupancy of the building was issued on August 8,2001 (copy attached). cc: Gregg Zimmerman Lee Wheeler Attachments Reid iddleton July 17, 2001 File No. 26-01-003-013-01 Eng Mr. Craig Burnell,Building Plan Reviewer Pla Building Division Sun City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 Subject: Lande Feed Store, Visual Examination and Structural Assessment Dear Mr. Burnell: We understand that the City of Renton's Development Services Division, in consultation with the Renton Fire Department, posted the Lande Feed building located at 95 Burnett Avenue South as a Dangerous Building per the provisions of the 1997 Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings. The designation was based on the hazardous and unsanitary conditions within the structure, including excessive litter and trash, numerous violations of the Uniform Fire Code, and other unsafe conditions and defects. We further understand that the owner/tenant has appealed the Dangerous Building designation. In response to this appeal, the City has requested that the building be evaluated for structural hazards and that recommendations be made regarding the following items: 1. Is the feed store area (first story of the main building) structurally sound and safe for use by the general public? Are any repairs needed at this time? 2. Can the structure be moved? Are any repairs needed for adequate stability to relocate the building? Per the City's request, we performed a brief site reconnaissance of the building on • July 9, 2001. The visual examination focused on the structural aspects of the storefront building only. The abutting storage/warehouse area to the rear of the store Washington area was not examined. In addition, exiting, accessibility, and other nonstructural Oregon aspects were not included as part of our evaluation. Alaska The building fronting Burnett Avenue South is a two-story wood framed structure built in the late 1800s. The first floor is a feed store, and the second floor is currently being used for light miscellaneous storage. Based on our visual observations, the feed Reid Middl store area appeared to be structurally sound and safe for occupancy by the general 728 134th public, provided that the second floor is not used for heavy storage or other use that Suite 200 Everett,WA Ph: 425 7 , Fox 425 7 Mr. Craig Burnell City of Renton July 17, 2001 File No. 26-01-003-013-01 Page 2 would result in high loading conditions. The framing members and their connections appeared to be in good condition. The lateral-force resisting system of the building is questionable due to the glass storefront; however, the vertical structural system appears to provide an adequate load path for the observed loading conditions. Prior to allowing public access,the siding and other framing members on the exterior of the building should be secured to prevent potential falling hazards in the area immediately surrounding the store area,particularly in areas adjacent to exits. It is possible for the structure to be relocated, either in part or in whole. If relocation is pursued, the building will need to be stabilized. A licensed structural engineer should be retained to provide appropriate.shoring and stabilization recommendations, and a qualified contractor experienced in moving houses or other wood-framed structures should be consulted. Reid Middleton, Inc. has not had the opportunity to review plans, calculations, or soils data for the structure,nor have we been able to perform detailed analyses or structural calculations. Our opinions and conclusions developed by this investigation are based on engineering judgement constrained by the limited scope of the investigation noted above. No other representation, expressed or implied, and no warranty or guarantee is included or intended. Please call if you have any questions or would like clarification on the information presented above. Sincerely, e n, Inc. Kylie K. Yamatsuka,P.E. Project Engineer bjr\26se\pl anrevw\renton\01\r013r 1.doc\kky Reid iddleton'1 • CITX OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor. Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator August 8,2001 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF RENTON Phillip Lande 9037 38th Ave SW AUG 1.0 2001 RECEIVED Seattle,WA. 98126 Dear Mr.Lande: - . • SUBJECT:Lande Feed Store—Do Not Occupy The city of Renton has enlisted the services of Reid Middleton to perform a visual structural examination only on the storefront building located at 95 Burnett Ave South. Based on this visual . observation, the feed store area appeared to be structurally sound and safe for occupancy by the • general public,provided that the second floor is not used for heavy storage or other use that would result in excessive loading conditions. Therefore, I will remove the "Do Not Occupy" signs for the storefront only and allow the public to conduct their business inside the building. Please be advised that the warehouse and storage buildings,north of the retail store will remain posted no occupancy until all fire and life safety issues have been resolved. If you have questions,please call me at 425-430-7280. Thank you. Sincerely, /41". °?' Larry Meckling Building Official Cc: Gregg Zimmerman . ,/Neil Watts Larry Rude . Paul Baker . Craig Lande lerMi 19Yo12001 Lande8801 1 ,055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 G� �_� ���� ,�_.. . July 9,2001 Renton City Council Minutes Page 222 MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Electronic mail was read from Cindy Williams,3129 SE 5th St.,Renton, Citizen Comment: Williams— 98058,requesting that the use of fireworks be banned in the City of Renton. Fireworks Ban Ms.Williams questions the benefit the City derives from allowing fireworks and wonders why fireworks are still legal. Mayor Tanner commented that the use of fireworks on July 4th did not result in any significant fires, so the cost to the City this year was minimal. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY BRIERE,COUNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Planning and Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a Planning&Development report regarding the preservation of the Lande Feed building. The Committee Committee discussed with the Renton Historical Society available resources for the Community Services: Lande relocation and preservation of the Lande Feed building. The Historic Society Feed Building Preservation was unable to identify any additional funding sources or options for the preservation of the building. Therefore,the Committee recommended no further action be taken on this matter. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Development Services: One Planning and Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a Valley Place Rezone,Removal report regarding the removal of restrictive covenants for Valley Medical of Restrictive Covenants(R- Center; covenant required for approval of One Valley Place Rezone(R-81- 81-047) 047). The Committee recommended concurrence with the staff recommendation to authorize the removal of restrictive covenants required as a condition of rezone of the subject property to P-1 (Public Use)in 1981. The covenants required that development of the site be limited to a Planned Unit Development subject to the Planned Unit Development regulations. The covenants are no longer relevant to present conditions surrounding the subject site and unduly encumber the property. Therefore,the Committee recommended allowing the applicants to proceed with removing the restrictive covenants from the land title. The Committee further recommended that the Council authorize the Administration to prepare any necessary documents for executing removal of the covenants. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Planning: Request for Zoning Planning and Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a Text Amend re Boat& report regarding recreational vehicle(RV) and boat storage. The Committee Recreational Vehicle Storage met on June 7th,25th, and July 9th,to review a property owner's request to add RV and boat storage to the list of uses allowed in the Commercial Arterial(CA) zone. • The Committee recommended that RV and boat storage be included in a revised definition of"Vehicle Storage"replacing the definition of"Storage Lot" in Title IV, Section 4-11-190,Definitions "S", as: "A specially designed,paved, and enclosed or partially enclosed area for parking or holding of operable motor vehicles, boats or wheeled equipment for more than seventy-two hours." APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL Date 7- THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT July 9, 2001 Preservation of the Lande Feed Building Referred July 2, 1001 The Planning&Development Committee discussed with the Renton Historic Society available resources for the relocation and preservation of the Lande Feed Building. The Historic Society was unable to identify any additional funding sources or options for the preservation of the Lande Feed Building. Therefore, the Committee recommends;no further action be taken on this matter. - z Ka by K olker-Wheeler, Chair Tern Briere Vice Chair candy Corman, Member C: Sue Carlson July 2,2001 Renton City Council Minutes - Page 211 AUDIENCE COMMENT Rick Moore, 16133 SE 179th St.,Renton, 98058, Chairman of the St.Anthony's Citizen Comment: Moore—St. Church Building Committee,requested direction from Council regarding how Anthony Church Vacation and to move forward with the site plan for the expansion of St. Anthony's Church. Site Plan Process Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator directed Mr. Moore to follow the conventional conditional use permit process; meanwhile,the City will investigate changing City Code provisions regarding the requirement of street vacations to be finalized before public hearings can be held for conditional use permits. Economic Development Administrator Sue Carlson added that the process to change the City Code can run concurrently with St. Anthony's Church site plan process,and both processes should take approximately six weeks. - Councilman Parker said that he is generally supportive of the project; however, there are some issues concerning the neighboring residents that the church needs to resolve prior to the public hearing on the conditional use permit. Responding to Council President Clawson's inquiry,Mr. Zimmerman clarified that he anticipates the Code changes concerning street vacations will be addressed before the public hearing for the conditional use permit. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Council Minutes of June 25, Approval of Council minutes of June 25,2001. Council concur. 2001 Utility: Transfer Water Utility Systems Division recommended approval of agreement with Bryn Service,Agreement with Bryn Mawr-Lakeridge Water and Sewer District in the amount of$7,000 to transfer Mawr-Lakeridge Water& water service for ten existing single-family dwellings in the Skyway area from Sewer District the District's water system to the City's water mains because the District's lines are old and need to be replaced. Approval is also requested to waive the outside City limit charge of 1.5 times the water rate for customers affected by the transfer of water service. Refer to Utilities Committee. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Electronic mail was read from Tim and Kimberly Searing,Armondo Pavone, Citizen Comment: Searing et and Charles Keeslar objecting to the proposal to relocate the Lande Feed al—Lande Feed Building building to the City-owned parking lot located at Wells Ave. S. and Houser Preservation,Relocation to Way S. The letter states that relocating the building to the parking lot would Wells Ave S/Houser Way S reduce available parking spaces,be a waste of public money, and be out of place and inappropriate for the area. Citizen Comment: Sullivan— Correspondence was read from Jim Sullivan, Sullivan Insurance,415 S. 3rd St., Lande Feed Building Renton,98055, expressing opposition to moving the Lande Feed building to a Preservation,Relocation to City-owned parking lot on Wells Ave. S. Mr. Sullivan objected to spending Wells Ave S/Houser Way S public money in such a manner and to the loss of parking spaces. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL REFER THESE TWO ITEMS OF CORRESPONDENCE TO THE PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Finance Committee Chair Parker presented a report regarding a compensation Finance Committee study for reorganization of the Information Services Division. The Finance Human Resources: 2001 Committee recommended concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve Reclassifications (Information the reorganization and reclassifications of the following classifications: Services Division) `Marilyn Petersen-Lande Feed Bldgy propo ; _ PagE f. .,.,2a 60-R 5estiDENCE ti From: "Searing,Tim"<tsearing@kvgmail.com> — To: "'briere@wolfe.com"'<briere@wolfe.com>, "'dvpersson@gwest.net"'<dvpersson@gwest.net>, kkwworkd@aol.com <kkwworkd@aol.com>, king@kingandbunnys.com,,, <king@kingandbunnys.com>,"'rfshop@gwest.net'" <rfshop@gwest.net>, "'danielclawson@seanet.com"' <danielclawson@seanet.com>,"'randy.corman@boeing.com"'<randy.corman@boeing.com>, • "'Jmedzegian@ci.renton.wa.us"'<Jmedzegian@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 6/27/01 7:59PM Subject: Lande Feed Bldg. proposal To the members of the Renton City Council, We own several buildings around the Wells and Houser intersection including the Melrose and Barei buildings. It is our understanding that there is a proposal before the Council that would move and place the Lande Feed building in the parking lot located at the corner of Wells and Houser. We feel this would have a negative impact on business in the Central Business District(CBD)and makes no sense to us on many levels: 1. The public perception that the City would be taking away parking from the CBD.The parking in this area is presently at a premium and this would further reduce the available spaces, chasing people away from downtown Renton. 2. The waste of our citizens money. We feel the City should use the public money more responsibly. The building is owned by a private party and should be moved and placed by the private sector. 3. The building would be out of place and inappropriate for the area (the proposed site). Don't get us wrong here. Our company believes in the preservation of historic downtown properties as is evidenced by our investment in the Melrose building. However,to use public funds and to reduce parking just does not make sense to us. George Properties, LLC Tim and Kimberly Searing Armondo Pavone Charles Keeslar CC: "'garmondo@msn.com"'<garmondo@msn.com>, "Keeslar, Charlie" <ckeeslar@kvgmail.com> /4ppp Co'R,R-e5/0AlPiA' Sullivan Insurance ' 415 South Third Street Renton,WA 98055 Phone 425-226-3322 Fax 425-228-9001 •CITY OF RENTON June 30,2001 j'5S ,m, Mr. Dan Clawson,President J U L 0 2 2001 Renton City Council RECEIVED 1055 South Grady Way CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mr. Clawson, I understand that the City Council may be considering the expenditure of public funds for the purpose of moving a portion of the old Lande Feed building to a parking lot on Wells Ave South that is owned by the city, due to the building's presumed historic value. While there may be some valid arguments for such an undertaking, as a taxpayer I am opposed to the use of tax money for this purpose. My objections are based on two beliefs: 1. First of all,historic value, like beauty,is largely in the eye of the beholder. For public money to be spent in such a manner would,in my view, require a project of such obvious importance that it receives overwhelming public support. Such is not the case with this building. It is simply an old structure in poor condition that has outlived its usefulness. I fully understand that there are individuals who take issue with this characterization of the building. My suggestion to these folks is to move the building to private property and raise private funds to restore it. If there really is substantial local support for saving this building,then it should not be difficult to raise the money. 2. Secondly, moving the building onto a public parking lot anywhere in downtown Renton is anathema to local tax-paying business people who are struggling to make ends meet and who are trying to make a positive contribution to the downtown business climate. Some will argue that the building would displace only a few parking spaces. The numbers will vary depending on the formula you use. However,it would be reasonable to assume that the loss of even a dozen parking spaces could easily cost the businesses immediately adjacent to the site at least a hundred potential customers per business day. To argue that the presence of the restored building would offset this loss would be, at best, unrealistic. The loss of those spaces would hurt not only those businesses,but also the City through the loss of sales tax revenue. Parking has been a major issue in the downtown area for years and continues to be an important consideration for anyone thinking of doing business there. Preserving an old building with limited historic value is simply not sufficient justification for making this problem worse. Thank you for taking the time to consider my point of view. I appreciate the fact that elected officials face difficult decisions every day concerning the expenditure of public funds and that every decision you make is questioned by someone. I also know that you do your best to make decisions that are in the best interests of the city as a whole. I hope that you will agree that it is not in the best interest of the citizens of Renton to expend public money on this project. Sincerely, Jim Sullivan 41126. Lv RECEIVED � 02Z001 CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT RENTONOTTYCOUNCL NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING MEMORANDUM DATE: July 2,2001 TO: Dan Clawson City Council Members FROM: Sue Carlson,EDNSP Administrator;,/� SUBJECT: Lande Feed Store Building Relocation Last Monday night there were several questions from the Council regarding the feasibility of relocating the retail store section of the Lande Feed Co. to the city-owned parking lot in back of McGowan's Restaurant. Although staff has not had time to do a complete analysis, there are several pieces of information that are useful to know for this discussion. 1. The parking lot behind McGowan's has about 38 parking spaces and measures 18,210 square feet. 2. The Lande Feed Store is about 36 feet wide by 51 feet deep for a total floor area of 1836 square feet. 3. The "historic facade" is the short end of the building. If the building were relocated this facade should face the street where there could be some benefit of interaction with pedestrians and traffic. Given this fact, the logical place to locate the bulidng on the parking lot is with the facade facing west and parallel to Wells Ave. It would make sense to keep the building as close to north wall of Spencer Court as possible. Part of the parking lot would have to be torn up and a new foundation and utility connection installed. See attached aerial of the site. 4. Given this configuration, the building, associated.setbacks and access would absorb about 35% of the parking lot. At a minimum 12 parking spaces would probably be lost. If the parking lot was reconfigured and re-stripped, it may be possible to impact fewer spaces, but this will be difficult because of the shape of the lot, which is irregular, and the one-way streets surrounding it. 5. Parking is at a premium in this area. When the City negotiated the air right lease above the parking lot on Main Ave., an absolute condition was that there was no net loss of parking spaces available for public parking. 6. Armondo Pavone is currently investing over $250,000 in rehabilitating the Melrose Tavern for a new restaurant. In order for that investment to pay off, Armondo must have parking in close proximity. Relocating the Lande Feed Store to this location would reduce parking by a third in this lot at exactly the same time that more parking in the area will be needed to H:\ECON DEV\Staff Folders\Sue's\landefeedsrelocation.doc\cor r , • 10 support this new restaurants.Restaurants require about 10 parking spaces per 1,000 sq. feet of space.The Melrose Tavern's 2000 square feet will need about 20 parking spaces to support it. 7. McGownan's has some parking across Main Ave for its customers,but relies heavily on this parking lot for customer parking as does Armondos original restaurant of Third Ave S. According to the parking checker that patrols this area, this parking lot generates about 20 tickets a week.This is "quite a bit of business for this size of parking lot."More tickets in an area usually means that there is not enough parking for the demand. 8. This location does not have high visibility if a retail use was contemplated for the building. It's off the beaten track for anything but a destination use. Very little impulse traffic will see it. 9. On the positive side, the building would fit the streetscape in this location better than placing it in the middle of a large lot with nothing surrounding it. In general, parking is at a premium in this area. The City is investing in a new parking garage about 6 blocks away, but customers of businesses in this area will probably not walk to the parking garage if parking is reduced. In response to the activity that is being generated in other parts of the downtown, property owners in this area are beginning to invest in their property. Reducing the number of parking spaces could have a negative affect on these investments. The City should be very careful about making changes in this area that could affect the fragile revitalization of this section of the downtown. cc: Mayor Tanner Jay Covington Larry Warren Gregg Zimmerman Neil Watts H:\ECON DEV\Staff Folders\Sue's\landefeedsrelocation.doc\cor .. C .0 Fi .;„„i., , D iir, ,„ 4 f iiiirly f.,701:„._ * 44. ,-_, 0 \ .14tkjt' 135, • i d 1 11111 4 oilipt I. ^gyp•. • T . iiip, . a, . ,.. „ . , . .,. . , ? oh, . , .., ., , . „, . ,. I 41011111.111111116 is"... lan (\lip ,,, r-i S 44 * : : 40 lb , 1 c AL AAWW 44 AO 44 It •,. . i ,,,,. .. . 1 , .... 400 ,,,,,,, e.. . . ,. ,. ,... . f -v� JF t t. .th,, 5, CID .- 444 '-'''.-4-06.4 Pr.' '''74. CD . -- ,.i ".. 7 _' ;"'" ' -ate <,r _-,. • '; r : • t: 4* e:• ;` 116' , . .,,.,,, 1 .. .. .. , i ,,,,, , ... ...... , Lande Relocation City property (18,210 sq. ft.) CD maximum setback line Lande structure (36' X 51') ti EDNSP 0 20 40 ♦4. O.Dennison 29 June 2001 ANT D:\ande Relocation.dwg 1 :240 vb. 4.1) ,. , ,.,.11.I, ,r4**"•-...T.- '---- • '! A '.ir D 'i f. _ ' • i, 4 r: �° ` • 3Sn ye _ q,C j1 X if •• ,PI •�( J - o n to s• /v . ,f A• 2 >' : : ; +. s_.; ail,}. h''l r "}it�1",Y s, ) •r ,T.,<rs,� ttt k- - N• �r ;P fkt 4 . i2;,y' .fit 4ii.� i.t_ � l it:4'':A, +i !r tr ! f0T l t,,., • . .i,-4..:, -.r..1.,'1.1.,4, 1 1. .. L•,,I 4:'rM 5,. x %t }.s,. 4 :'...rt'"4 ' Jaf y' rd'e L Ap` ( Y,. 1 .' 1 �?$.. $' Y li rc;•.FiSW r. . .., ,..I.. - r r 't a ; \I • 1 i" a• j"..n °',.s _x :vF.,L{'+s+e„t:- .trY r 4 I t• `,47 •4,..,'":1....:.. V.'..,7:., , '... '. . -,: ' I'. '-:‘, �rr� .;,. «' �. • j'0- • .",— Bi. �+ .. ,} .ter 3.Z -„ ./.s •!�,{ •ti,� - :k�5 `, 4 3E„ ti..l n(a f� ,. ',� x At,+,' .fir : i ' ''..j- : ` i li iit s i 5y!a , a4 c. F:' iii333 ���515151 all • . , . ,_ ; : \ a IIT . clima 0 I ' i r 41 i z . IN \* i ; 1 Ira :„ , , loll , , _. .. , vA A\ ' . 1 ► , , , . E f . . . ., .00 ., , . .. . , .. . . H:.. . . . . . . . , . , , . mg . , . : , , . , , , , 1 1 . t , , . , , !\„,. ,,,' &llillllflhl f , ., 1111 .f :1) • . .j:' 11/4e , r I 1I11U ,.. .. , , , . 11 /J .. '1 ll/� 1 . , ' 1.-i • 12.' 't ' Ileriat4.7 1 ,' 1 I i ,, '4.1/4.... ' il •Aillt,(1— 'a,, ,-,• •,, I, •Si, , , , I 3 . , _ i, ' ' • ' ' '' ' . 1 st 1 5', :' • ----,4 4 • 1 ___ t \ ' \ \ ..... .... . Ii ...... 0-i. „.„, ,„ 1 t , I 444. 4•44. 1 ! .... • ,o i i , ', Ili,; '''..•%" 0 ' • - 1 1 4 • % • S t 1 1. 4.41, "*.----.11 i I 1 1 1 . , . 'l' \\il .'''''';;; 1 • , t 1, .. , i _____________ ,,.,.i# , „iii „. . \\ 1 .)1 1 , • ''r , v --1, ; , ,1 ., , t; r A \,i i , . ,:.. -, i ..... f - \ ...... ,,,,,,... . li 1 • is. • • 1 ' ''ii( - t; It F a i f --4 v, 'i . ' \ ', '- .. airli ,\::,,,,,,,,,,,,.-. ,, I,.;.1-;;,:' ., • t k i• 1- 11,1_,\. , • it . r , ..... t -S. •...t- - i . .41,.... , ,„ .„1, : ' 1 11" 111 \t '1 ' , 0, 1 :ii 4 I 1 .--- --cl u1 r•i '1. 0 , i,_ i • 1 11111 .,,..,. t , • 1 i P,,,,, \ -,2, / .',‘, 'i:', ' ' i t 0 '4 I ; r ' • t • tt._ 1 ' 1 c 7.w...r.... ,-:....___-__ ____..--L, _ - t, ', * ,1 •i .,.. r riik: t't•ti',1 1 i, 1 1 i , lilt, lima. ; It ' , .• 1 dr Itill 1 . 111 i 1 i , .•i •,,, ., - . _ __ • - --ran la r ill44 1 L i'..'' I t t I ' I i l . fIr , I a*. • 41 ' • C_Ifiglot 1 4_ " j • • I 1, 1 1 4.------.--• I r I i J ; ',F t**1 I r ',""--'' - - 7'4 1 • i 'i i -' '•l' 11,, — .1 ' •-•1 Pr / O. 1, t . .. , t • i i 1 miumormiliimim \ 1 0 1 " • .' t * . 4 '' 6_ I I••• 4 I -fttai. 'I 1:6 i t We. = __ .'''.444`all • • • i i•• i 1 I ' • ''b. k, '' 3 t . t. " . ' 11 i , ,, Is 1 , , 4 I , 1 .' gf t ! , , • 1 ri '1 ' '' t ' . t, - t '..:4,,,1 -1-, + 1 1 '1 1, i ' fl 1 ' 0 'I ) 14 . t • .\ , ti.'''';:,•:,'il„ '1,' 1 - — ' - ' - 1 '.- I . I41 /'• ' ' '7- \ ','\ I ' \ \''• q• ; 1 . r ' . ... 1 , , •,• • . 1, . 1 , 1 1, .• , . • \ ' ' •41 , • 1 . v.., . 1 1 i . • ,. ; , . •', r , g is .4 . 1 , ., , :, . \ t z , , ,,,,_, { , :, i : t I, LI I t . , I , 1 -.• „-,..r.1 _ . . _ ...... - ow a t i • i .;k:-,..""111111' ' al - •4/ ////////4 lir,////,,/,, :/'1 ° ,.. . ...' !: ` 1 i 1 ...0 - ... ' 4 '• / -.L , • , / ,/ / : ',.,'WI .7 ‘ , .1/.1 i 1 . ./.../. ......,„,,,,/, /,.. „ / ,//, ,/ „ , a, / / / fil , ,f•- a / , 1--'- • , ; ti;'.." 7 . ilikk.':,E,;, • '. , /, , _ I ; .. • , ?X% *- ' :, • r - 1 '' - ° ,...- ./ . , , ..,.., ..•' i il 1 '-'4::A51 , '1-. r t' l ii# Ilk i ' , 1 '4....4,41= .4----=1)''r•s'.';9.4?-1' ,1 41. . , 1 I .-7=Pirli ' • A . . .- 41 4 I 1 4 I----.. . , 1 4 ' k.i.1 „A- ir- t `19::'' --- *•4 • ,i ,i, :„.„----- - • . , t t 1 , .... , '....--/ • . . 44.' ',,.I.-',•, 1?.,.,',1::"I :,„i,it: ,,e , , , l',,, •,*,,,,,,,,,.,,,.,,?••••:77,,';:i -4•5/,„,,,,,,,,,,,,i„, ,, ... . , . - -, . •.-,,,:(•,,,,,,,, ,,,,, .,fil,,,,„,.. ! .it,.li 1 1.; ,1, ;.1 i . 1r ) ,.., :,,„,, •.„1,.,,,,,,f,0-145,41,•=:,:,;::..,,Ig',]?... „.,.t.", ,,„:4•,,,,c:,.,-.,•:,.,,,;•- ' . . ,,-.. -*.•,....,•• : 4 - - - -,"' • • :,•ir.,•„zArt-•,,.4,.-.• .",4,,,il• 'i 1 ,,,i. 11, I it' '" -',' "i' :;---',•-.-,A.:1-e•••014.,:, .1,11',1,,,'11.1,i• ,'ot,ij - ---.--,-,-,- i 'i'' ', ; 'r! ;,,:i•'..l..,.•,,-;',.,.;•.•.;•.,..,•-•//?,,,,,, .,, ,,,:,,,,,,,,.!.•:,:::` ,..):4 .-.• . . . .,.. . •. ..,..,•.,:.•••••,:te,A„....,1„,... , ;I.,,,,,,.i.:!1„ . ,1,I,. , i._.! 1 . ! .' ,',. i.:,,,,.k...,!..41,t4',",.,.."-:,- ,...;•.;,':,5',3,',Atii.,1-,-,''•'. _ . . .. ..,-• •••• '',-;:- : :-.:.,,,•-•",-.,•-,tiii. , 1:'II'.;',',I:'I ::-I :. ',i 1 - -...11-1 1 ' ,,',.,i.; , r.‘.1,;,, $4i:vt.m.••.','.#',', •"ii,..„...-.4,4,;,.1'1,',-"' ; • . . .. ' .:•.-• • • ---,:,,,,,,:?::,,,i4.`• i.I ,;•••,..1.,i'•• •.'0 ir,. 1.,--,..------• - : . h,41-•-•. ';,-.'4.,.'4.11;.V..,‘&-'`,,.sq'i..„,...%74.iyii,V•I'. i . ' . ,,,,,:, - ,•, ,,_ , ...-.•;.--...-,,,i1x..• •,• ,.' t,':,,4: ,ii 171 ,ii„ , 1 „ ,' ..iff,-k.i•,4,;-,7,,,i ,t.;!=•,,.4...,1,4,,,s,,,z,fo!',.4. ,tfr-i,g;,,„,,v., - 1 .. . .... ,. . . ' . • :.,..!,---(-,-,:.'''.,,::..'4'--;:;i.",..,:•••:*, Ili l'i.•. 1-, "1 I .','1.-.-.':.1. .' ...44.,,,,-,-.4,1,•.ikt,.,k';••,•,,-;,,-•/,;,/,..:*0 ,010,14-' , f , . ., ••,.: ' ',. • '- : • - •••'• :'-!:''''','; :1-,,.'4•,.;`..i;-... ..!.1::0-3-.1:f.....`i•.``,•,;.-4i'',.:-'`'''': •''.1 •ir ,l-t' '''''I'' II ', •*=''',W1:',41,: ';');i1j4-:,,i,,il:'.:•;,..'s'26;:i ?.',;A:,•41,1'411S-i? i , . ^- ' .; :1.4 -44-44-.., • • • .. :stf,:i.-:444::‘,.., ,. ',• , :;•;'" 4i•;',.c.; 7 •••!. -- '-'-'•"i'.:•:-.:.:.',...:Ai',.:k,k,ks,..?.',,,-:-',',;.,`-i-V;i:', ,.`..1 i'.;,',..1,r-' 7. --i-'1 il '', 5.'.!..,tIt'•'6,• '8.1,'.-.J.,...,,,,:t..., -.''‘;:-,t..'V,:4r,l'14•,,,,,'f ' . - ..-!,,,•f- ....,-1.• .,, -..,.,•J ••_-.,..--....:4:t1s,..„.-47,-' ''';,-.4,,ii.:,,'', i.',1 .f .,1 , r,,' .1 . ,,,,,, ,; ., i,,,,, ,,,,,,,::•4, : -*.r,,.. - Y tr:',"` . . ' ..- ',1'..:' ..',.•'..i';;1,4,;;;frYt....;.'..',4 vc'::?.:..., ,' :.L..—.24,,...IL LJ.,'-,“I" I,'I I‘ ';;;:!",r'‘.11.4'.; '*l_y,'''•• ,-.4*.,' " -,.1 ' '''I'pht;AO I • . ' ' ' : '''''''4f's'',', ,'1,..::. ',..' '',',, ';i. '..•::?'-‘'''-; :Yi:44e,-: ..;:4:1' ''`'`4... ,_-;;'.'4,-• ' -----.;-;- :" 4 ; I,' ; '1,":•;A),:4.•lit''' ViAf.-°31#` 4) .'...- 1' f'4I Vt.'s'°'. ' . • • ' •• ' . , . '•••:•F''''•,•.' ,:,-;4;;-,,,..i.,•;',..4...I.-4,,.4.,.•.:-,-,,,,:".,,,,,,:v., ,•,),.., •_-,,...,,,. 1 ..,q,:i.... fill',..., ,.t,i.„..Av., !.,...ig, ,:k_-i ,.s..,,,,:4.:1 , -. ., . , . .:. i, :: ::::',•'.,". .•....:•...".',iii::::.,:;,*::''',-.Z; ''.,"1..-:.. 1,1t - '4'ily .,..1.,.1 t•, ',,,ii. .,,n,.:', '..„.„ ...,,-. . ; , _ 1,, , . , - ,, ,.,,,,.,•:. -, .. . _.......,,,,•-,,,,..e,:,,,,,-‘,... ,. . , - 7....,,, --e- e.A-„•,,,,, 4,1fi'/ *‘1 ''' .-• 'iji-14 - '' * . . , .1.`:!..,'• ,, .."' ' ' f''..:,-."*-. -....',t'-':g.'1."."ik. .-,:,%.,,,`''-:,R.Y* ' ,', i 'ik , ,,,,,f,•r...,,,, ,,,,%,f,?, ,•,... li- ',09- *.*''. ii. r 4 • f . •• -'• * '...:•....,...:,:?„, -;..ti,"::‘ -,',,,-'•:". '- , + '',,-.1.1 ' 1.:".:-: '1-'f,'',3•',..`“ V-i,erk 1p,7.7. '.•• ' 41 . : ., -,, ,,.., . . ,. ,-:‘. I '. :' :;, . ..... •-e, '`,;,:i•:;,,,:f.t,',.:t ,,-,.'"* -.., " '.1! . I--;- "i1 .' i .r '' r ,Iiii. I.!, \,k'l, 'is'r,I ..r ;-':,f, '' , _. --..,• ' ,. .„. .... ..,,.. . . .-„,,,....,,..,,.,-'.,.._,r_,,.!-#-•r- ., - ,,,, , ,, ::::...'..,„.:.!--!--;':;-,tL.,,c• •`-'i5'--.41',.'",'--',„, `:.•`-• 1 ..,,,_-?!.2„.;.-4..!' . •,r. -, ',.‘'t,•1•`', ',. .,.',. i ,"1,•',-,i*.• :•,.) ,.:1:41 •,• ! ,... L.- . ,-'• ' ' - • , . . , , _ „„..:,, • --,,.._ ,..,),...:-,,,,l':',-;::,-,'.;•,:,,,W:r.'2:,',,,, ::,,,,,'. '-,,l', ,:i--7---ribl 1 .,. ,I 1$1 '1 p. '',‘ y.-..5eig '... .1.1 , ; '..• ' .: , . ' . ,. •.%.- ' .....i' :,-..'.,,.•:.,,"`..4." 1,i -ie;.L'i?74.'...1‘175: - - , `14,,i• -• rAgr 4 14' ' .: `'.1`• •'V'' ',1‘'" -.; ''''''''' :'''-'1-!?! i • •'''•'•• ' -' '' ..•,, • '''''' 1:14` ••••:'-':.:-. :-4,7:7:V410'2. •:.'' ',;•-•2 .., •k•Q).:::•)'• ,•-• • i'••,, 1 ••'i'It ‘ • 'C',..riz's4;;-. :4;4 '-t.r. •, ‘-' •„:,. ,.: 0 . -,,,-..i,, ,‘, 1, ... ,t- . ., .., , ;-')!;',4:::',:.;./.i4.',1":--;ed..18'7,,,,•'.-:'-',/ '-',„ -"ji ti` ' ••.4 401'14 ''!',I ''. '.. '1•‘.4 .i.,. ., • . •?. • • :1 1,.. • .• •q.4.:.-N.:•:'-ii,4:4,;-. .-'t". '',.. •r t"' • f'q• ' I'vt,t, .i - ' ' ! t1. ,if,' 1 '• 1 , \.it.„ A al-v" . .k"'• , ,t.2 . ‘. , I... . 1 .. , 01.:/1.: 'P.- ...T.-.,t'...7..,'''C;','''''''':!:1;;f..-Irk '' .' i '' •''',ti; ;4'.. :'- t. '-', '.'' ':'''.11.-. ... '1‘. il -• _ ?,-44:VP‘''' : ' .. , '' ' • ,,, .f 1 1 ' .: ': 1 ', ''''.:c:i;.: ,'°•.'*:,..,?, :,1:'. ' . -s*,'‘.:.`.,'...;. ,..!;',:'1';1`.4,--*'' I If: kti il.-..t.,, hi.i \1,1:. .1 ,‘,1-..1 1. • • - ' '•".':''.!::''..i'7161*: • '''' ' '-4 ."1' - ‘‘ k, './:./ 1 '-4 I• s'Vitlil'' :1: ,1*1'' . *-.*1..7. 'T., , • 1.•:-,',, •.•••,1-4,..- ., Z ' • . ' 1 i' ' •::.. ,, '1 v. ' '.'...: .. . .........t,-„,-,4••,• :it, , ,..c.,.4 Ili ./., , J, i ,v.,-..i,;•, . - t:.,. ,2.:1:,:i,. ,i„1- : ' . ;.,-,..',,,;,..'•.' p'<b. . , . . . -. -.„-..,,•.•....•;.,,,,,...., . ,- „.,,,, ,, 14', '17‘: • : ' ' • i..i. ,' .."•%.1 ' ••• :.:'' '' :.:".--.•:;."--:-,7,:::...,:5" :; ' ''.,;',', I., ' il ii,Vi. ,*-,',,,..7,". i4,4 ,------..4.f.'-'''"fii.;,,,Y,4-,••••-a, ,,,. ,. -.,,•.,,, , .,,, . . , 1 ; ,..;....i. :...r; ,'',;';'::4..Y'. 4'.'‘r.:' 414M 15:4C.1:''. i i . '... 'L'.i .'. .'"‘ 1 ir 1 S,';i'13.T . .4.i. ., .r r-,--i•A,-.''..t,: 4 •- • ,`,,',!.1°,,i'''• 41 N.4 , :'''' %ILI .''.,-,,' '''`.1.•'.',.L.,•":.,,_; , ..,,,,,,,ATW' 7 ' Gi,! 4 Z1; • ; •!1'fo ''-'''4,14''''''•41 --:.';,•14'4144' ;:, • :••,...-;•,,r-,4,-J,,...;,•, '74r. .i.,7‘. , '41.'.":•:,•- '.,','.•••• -'-..7,••.'''-',--- ,/ ' li,„„:,,,,,,,,.,- ,, .••• .s- ,,, ; ,•-,,,.. ? . ,,-..,,,,,,,,,,,A' ,,,- ., -`',,' ,, ' : ..;..',.1:,,-,•,- , . ..,• .4;;:,. ',;.:'.•••• '''•.'..:`,Y,"•,'''..•,:,.3':,:'_::::; .41 p "`:-.'N' 1,1!., 1,;), i • '•'•,..',.-.." ';:',.' . t :I,' . • ' '.. ••:•"k.:'.•';,'":,,1:;'. '..--.-,,,, /,' i z i„..t. ,' ',, ' _%,„-.. 1*4=1 4;') 't.'.''...7A: ' , ,'.::*.:'':.•':• A t_. ..q. ' ' • r' ' — : ,!s:.'24::;•,,,:., — 1, i'l.ft.:1';.1" '(.,iyi ‘',4,*..,, 1;:',4,;;'-'-'. ,-",!'...''' o'', ' ' :.-;...,---;,•,''.<: Qs i"ti . , , .,• "4 A‘r,,d1 b t,.../ •1 .,41,'.., It... ,4'-.1k. .e-,.. . , -'... --......' . ii 1 ill Fillif-1.'i'''1,• ,..-'1"t; " ' ' 1.,4;04240!Y. .'IS:,:/.:::s:,-i3,7 in.1`-,.•nic. '..'''.. 1 r,..1 ; , -.i`;.,',. 14`z...ca ,. ., \'' fp .,Il.11'.u_.1_. ,i. ,„ 1 , ---i i 1 _ 1,14,1' .•,-,!.1 ,T';!,,i'k s.:...,:',,,k,,,'`;k4v-t#0,40-4idieip-,, ,.- --1 . . .1,",...:.':--•• .,,,:.,r,,,,,..„1,11,, ..,,,,,,,--., 4:....:: i t,•i'"'••• °'01 i ;••". • t.,,,„ -,•''' ). III ' 'I,'/E4 li :1'r . ,.--i 1 1 , ,,-,it,,,,.... '.of 4.i.-J;'''•.-.•e4f. ' 4 i;''' 't'•1'' 1 ' •''' '. ' to ,' .., ..-.) • • , ,...4 .''.,'. . ' 4.=4'''I '''' 1.--- ' ' ..,,,,. ,t)Tr;'.•f. ,1'4,1 1'6,'t.i..:04.f'f,`;•,'4-'-ot, •.-' l ' 1 .• . ".:•'•:.'41;i4;'!-0',.', • (1%s%*t It ,..• ..•7: i_.,,./ .,.: : , ''......: " I '''.'l'.1 ;' i 1 l'• 1 }T'L\I '.1'143% ':7 :i El' *NI- •••-;,1,' ).;':D!••i.t'•`,., )i.:: .•,• • 4'•,'.„.5:4‘4.‘,.,''.'11::',i -8 ... , -,,, ,,..;, i, 7 ''''-- d-i, ...r-,,-,,, ,k . ',I --ix-. I, : : It.;‘,.%.„,,H , ',14',111,: ::':',.,-.44.•;tc :, ft :..4 3.,:;q,','„r1,,,,,, ',,,,,,A ::.._.4:4,-/ .,,,-:,,,,,,,,:,,,,,,444..a,AVA ' .:I,LL4g.'-:,:-, I. V,.,t.At'. f,- I-1.,• it r*'f V2.-,^ g—''„:s,`.1...,'...;‘ . 7‘`'.'1,'-',.,..,'ir 'C'''......'%if ' . '`. ',.. ' ...'2 '',,,.. ''4': •?..:'1.: - 1 ' 1 ' . T MID '' ql:%!.. -,'.i.i.':•,•'N.pv.'•'` :te,)itr,";‘"*.‘..;'i;.,e,.., ,,;,-,.;,:vyfill,-/„.•1;:z - ' ' ' 1 '''' ',,'',:?.. .'1, .' • 'sa:•. ' .::;'" •-.....:'3',•-•,',.• I' :t;', ', i--- ' ' • 1 - 7 1 .',,ffit,:fff:-.1..,,,,,.*.c,14i .,'4,A-ffivt.i '$,,i;,!. -,:i::;: .:',' .-,•,_;,4,..-4,-,,,,',5:,1.i:-4.,,,_ -. , t, . ,. .,.- '1 . '}a_i ti ,E•.:.... 1 ' 7111 t ';..'./ilf',. ' '..;71,.P'..,,,Ir'll'.' 'rIi-A,..), 'ii itif‘if, 4fi _ ::•:,:,.-15...1,,,:%*:.:Ici‘4•ft,41' ..,- • • - ,••• , ,4 ••'..}?4 • : 44: ,, • (:, ••A'zkii 141"el','.4.1,1:44''24''',''.4`"''',••'••••,:'*t.t.n1,,,-. '44,-;`,,ri,:v.,7!.; •••;•';AT,2::,-4';'4•:.•F4',4•„'-',..,14,;41'-•.4tii'.i.' . ' • .4•;;;:if;s:".•:„ ' . ,, ''; .- P• . . -,•,. ' 'f. ,4•4:. •, : , • 4 :.,..,:•''•',`,,,';‘ : .•••'' .„,'.•::: II'--1.,1,1.-r,,.,,i,„4 -,-.,-,-Iy„ •,,,,,,„-himag-'04'1 443:t..=,41:;,T)kl,4‘.4 '`i-.d,'•:,-;'.',,,,; ' li I..' '1.,-_,-.4, ., ,.,,,;i,;,,,-!,F,',,f... .A.,:ti;',,,,tif,-.,i:t: ,.,. , .... .- ,.:.,',, ,.',3'.).: 74,L,,,,.'s,./` '=ti, 'ii '.1 tat'.-'''0...1.2,0 ,,',4..•' '''' ,Ivi. ,g.,..,44,14,-- ,• ..,,•::,...:,,i...,,,,..,--..,,,,:.,,,,,z,,..14 ,' ',- ,•• ,,,,t• ,,,,,,. „t,,, ..., ,• , .., .,, ,,,,,, .., • . .... • ,'•,., ,..,„-,, '1-.--•-_ , ':?,•',..-;;I:.; , .? •ill /,..t...14, '41;1, tris'/.1'.. .' . ''.:2;(:.;;;;','.',..f,',;.''....-::,';':IY•40 , , ,. '. :::."':',,,,T ',•, '.,;,‘...,:. ,, ' '''.;:,.0. : . 7,,,i,, AL,,\.•:!, _,_,,ir-,,,4 ipt-1":1'.i2.,A 6-4%.' •''' (rq,„ I:,,,,,4 4jt,..,' '-,;,:-/Q.:,•;Z: ,,k- ,., , .,.-,.4,,: ,L:' •.:•.„'.:1, P :' '''','/-rer,''.'••••.:'-i:,,,,,t,: , . ,,...,44,:..4:-z,,,, ,„,,,, , : ,..,.,,,,,11371., f .4,,1,1t-lt •,i,I,I,44:,111'":L;'•'?,1,1.711j ,',I'‘:-!.it.,',;'; eY;s5ft rt;Ois,''' :.:::%:.1-7, 4 •,-,•,_!/.;•?;, •':‘,'•, •• ••1:•:,'fii: `,,,',,,:','• . .?•3••..i.-4 .:' ';'•ti ..,.••:‘,,...'.1'.:',E,',',.'.'' .- :4•''',,.*,''..1,.:,,i ' , fi? 4,,I 1_1_:ir.,!1 :141,4:341;fvf,tt.1-4":chi , if•.4,;,,,, •4 , it,;(1„,;= f4, :•.,,'5,' 1 '!;•;•.:g,i;:,',:,,,,/,..4..1;i*,;,%.*1--•'` ,..,;,,,., ft',;.;',11'11, i -t • , ,;,;'-*1-',::Lk ' 2'',I* !.. , Ai' ;'.4, 'a•Mlb'''''t 1.11)' , flat!, '''I,%) .;j i t.'?oh.-; ., •,..t-iilvt/f 311, ,;:. t •",.;L::!..i-,:s..-:.:•: i..'.';,.,;•.,,.- .•.,,,,.., .,.. ;; 4. * 1:,',q:;,',. - •• , .. ',...qb-'1'fl'''''-'' : 5;2:', '.1 7-441:4•••••••",""s g•-AN')' a•••\ill • 14:d•i: ..4"; Y-• ifi it•,..1 t•••.,.i? 1,•,, i,4'.•'••:44.*:,,',7%,', *,!: & •:,"0,..01:'-'4 -.?,..•.'-:':':.; :.?... • ..',i-'•••.':-.:' ''":".1:".4-4',...:;•:. f.,,,, , i , , ',,1 ':- 1 , ,,,,?, ...,' , ,', ' '':, , ...,4p, ,•'.'.:,,i•r,_,J., , ,s,—,47...$., p.„y. 1- ....t,.:',,•. .:,iri..--..., '. ' . , '.' . ".:, — .,,..., r:-.1--:.'.,.....• s.:-.:°:‘,:;';',;!:'-';- '-'I '3.1 -' .- 11 i.--j si . t' .,;I:1 i 4 -co P ; ••„1110t;IN'.;.tf,-/'*AN, ! •.''l-.1 ''...,>.;:',';'',.: :.• .. , ..,,', :' ,.*'''',', A - ,;, "I' ".-1 •-."....:••,:•:1,1;43:7:•-_,A-•':•," ."::•.'4.•:`,`..,--,..,..,7 ...,t,•',1'1.• •- - ":'`',,.• ),,,,, ',gif,,-0 i . lY.,' ,',',',• : -,,'‘`PVil,‘!!‘ -:. 11 ; ' ''.;'..,.,•-•:•.....'-:.,:, . ' . . ,',.,,•'•,,,,-...,..'.: • ,.,,,,,,', ;•.:'• • - ' --'..15;;',....--, "4al,„;•„„ ',r;,:,'1,:,'Jitil ',,.,,I, '1'..• `k: ' ..P,',k• :,..;V:1.':-; ', tit4 , ''; lk,':kag44.°14. .`.k ; ,' ,, is,p'1,,,;,:,,..''''''' ...' ' ' : ',I.-% ,-1;',4_;'`'.':, .5!(1,,,,,,,',',':,'ciA';'.'i:*I4,1T1 it.4 1 *;211:.. 1.4. •: if''''..:: ' 1 ,h1:14 '-'1"1'l'g''''•;.ktt'f!;*:'!t1ZWr:r i 'r,'4''''.*. L. ''', ; ,.r'., -....„-,;,."2; ,f.:1"--..':,1, '.' •=';' ..g.',7•:,ic:i,',::11*,,,.':iti, t,; 7',•1: ''';•f:4'.: '..,,ii.. .11)fific ,,,,,,,i)L.,_,:,:44.:.,..74-4.4,:*, 1.,,, •''..c.,,-:::,.,,e.....,:'...;',,';',,,-;:. , -:- • 1' . '...,--.••,:- - .f. •yot;.'...i.qi, '':% ,:lt•it ' • , • c e't'•-*' ;•ti •••• 4•A,4•,,,N.,,i4ii..T ,,,.:14,..,,, :,4. • •4 '.',1'' ''' --''-'- ' 4,,,, . • " ., il'I .:1'34111)...-:' . '''',,''''', " • ,',:;,.1.1..::'''..--,';',,", l'%"31::',i,,,,''-:/,''''''':'' ,''•''''!..s:',,r.:%?;1.,:',k1,1r' 3'4.irtit'41!, '1 i ,1' .I.,,;,,i::4,-- ',' ,,,:birtA:1110,srpii" .'1::r''''''''...'4,,k..,i,:114;fer.'11.„':''':'‘.11.:. ' ,„.::,,,:',11.;''::: .-1'2-.1'.,, ',', `..' : , , ! . -',' ',.: ,. ;C:sf,,:( 1 .1 'r 1 - _.... '.'-', "..Aft. .' ' ' : ''',..'4;.;' '''..:!: ' ';:i4'....::"•::::;..' ti41,„" .:1 (3:1 :'!' ' .1 !!rlid::, iii: ' .14,445,44;41;•,4,1,311-1;',:''i,01,i'44 .1- , ---E,----,-,,,,;,,, -.:,12-,,,, —;•-1!.....-....,,,,, q,•..„,:iit , , , Immi..,,s., :.„,„_.:44....+4*;. •; ;/. ' • .,..,,,I.,, , ,,,,:,„);`,1/,.4, ,.,,;it, .,,,,,,,,,,. ! — . .... .... _,,,,w,, 1178,-') \\\ \ \ \ ( V 1 / / t_ 1 ill,7 T1- 1 -=-4_, =11 , no. ,, =) .1 . 1 , 1 v I I N . I II PI . -r-1- 111=111•11111110111111U1 I - I I * I I I I I , I I ! i 1 •1 1 i I 'p i , iI . �, �_, � „......._ -- -, -�� ., 1 , I 1 _ . , 1 ! , I I I I 1: i I , ! I I ' 1 1 . , ti ,ems t 2 x f r' ',fir. •'I,,' E �4•} "X / . �' • ,t ,, iE . / f 11tsa.1 1e1-f0f ig 1.if6,i1 J • f flltf �t �,.. 1 !// !t eft Ial .• ^ s. / !/ / ,� f A . '-' - ' ...— — - i a.: •1, lillif aft lit/ , ... *, - : �°�' - . . ill all I r��► tl Sri t t' rit ,rrit, "'gar r . / rrt lip • p ' Ill - . 11 Er' ✓K .t iw .4 L ;N r�t.f''6:� 1 f T- F,' / /� ,,,'''''''''.•:.:,1'; fy ''I. ../if/ / i1' F• •_ .R 4 1iyyF 4 . Z*,a y ', .,.:.r, 4. srif,r,„otrT' • • }- r lotiAw ity.„-,.. \ r,:el , 7 jy ` je \ _ . •. e r`1 7r , . ,aw • 1 F 1. I 4 4R'ty.. F ,$ I - j::t y`•r ; �.:.�• ' rp� •-! -et \ t s O irg CELEBRATING RENTON'S CENTENNIAL 1901 - 2001 PLEASE HELP RENTON HISTORIC SOCIETY CITIZENS FOR CULTURAL &HISTORIC PRESERVATION (CCHP) SAVE HISTORIC LANDE FEED STORE Built in circa 1900, this building is an excellent example outside and inside of a typical 1800's style architecture. With a classic Old West style false- front, large paned windows and wooden porch front door entry, this historic gem would fit into any western movie set or historic ghost town of"horse and wagon" era. Being in the same family for 76 years (amazing), Lande Feed Store has stood still in time on the inside, as well as the out. Interior cabinets, wood floors, old scale, etc. make this place a time machine of the past. The building's history includes being used as a meeting and dance hall upstairs and Speak Easy. It is one of the last surviving examples of an early-day grange hall. Building was also once owned by well-known Renton Pioneer Erasmus Smithers, and since 1956, it has even had it's own ghost named 011ie. Business owner Craig Lande has worked this store for over 40 years, starting as a child working with his father and grandfather (who wore ruts in the wooden floor where he stood for over 40 years). I, myself, as managing director of this preservation effort, am a local historian. I teach my own Local Historic Landmarks class and my new Historic and Abandoned Ghost Towns of the Old West at Green River Community College. I've traveled historic communities and ghost towns throughout the Western U.S. and can honestly say I do not recall any building this authentic still functioning as a remnant of our historic past— truly part of our cultural heritage. Imagine this building restored—new paint—nice grassy landscape with picket fence -tables and chairs to enjoy espresso—neon in windows—new sign on front. Stepping inside, you are transported back in time to an old general store atmosphere. Moving upstairs, there is an old meeting hall (with stage) that can be used for entertainment. The possibilities are exciting!! Please review the fact sheet and supportive material and consider being part of our Centennial Project by making your land/lot and/or donation available for our new site where this building will be restored to it's proud original condition. We will provide additional supportive material (including names and numbers, etc.) upon request. Please call for an appointment to meet in Renton on location of historic building and potential relocation sites. You are also welcome to our weekly meetings at Renton Museum every Wednesday at 3:30. Please call for more info and confirmation. Leave message with: Connie Hoffman—CCHP Contact/Coordinator (425) 254-8982 or e-mail: saveourhistory@hotmail.com (Z7 2. 200/ Daniel Palmer Director CCHP 2 FACT SHEET JUNE 2001 HISTORIC LANDE FEED STORE BUILT CIRCA 1900 1. Renton Citizens for Cultural and Historic Preservation& Renton Historic Society.Preservation Committee's Centennial Project: SAVE Historic Lande Feed Store Celebrating Renton's Centennial 1901 —2001 2.. Task: .Move building to a new site in Renton (preferable in historic business district).for better viewing by the.general public and.to be restored inside and.out. 3. Building Size: 30' high.(36'wide x 52' deep) box— approx 1,872 sq ft. 4.. Original.Owner (76 years in business) is willing_to continue financing his opportunity to continue his business as a service for animal goods (dry foods, etc). 5. Need: an appropriate site preferably donated land but will consider financing options. 6. We are seeking grants and/or donations.from Foundations, business, organizations,,and individuals to help make this dream (new site to restore this historic gem) come.true. Donators.will have their name listed on a Centennial Plaque placed prominently on the building. 7. Boeing Company may provide.a 2 to 1 matching grant. 8. Owner.of company.—Robbins Company (Rob Robbins) -.that.moved Howard Hughes's world's biggest airplane —the Spruce.Goose—have surveyed and given.bid.to.move building.(they claim job will be a"piece of cake"). • This building is highly rated by King.County Historic Landmarks (Julie Koler—phone (206) 296-8689) i s , • .It meets criteria for State and.possibly National Registration of Historic Places. • Lande Feed.Store building is listed on King County's.Historic Sites Inventory (1978). It is. 1.of the 27 official sites.located in Renton. • May qualify for grant money to restore.building.inside and.out including tax breaks,.etc. • Will.be brought.up.to code of(Health and.Safety) • This Centennial Project is strongly.supported.by Renton City Council —particularly members: 1: Randy Corman—(425) 430-6'501 —.email: rcorman@ci.renton.wa.us 2. Dart Clawson—(425)430-6501 =...email: dclawson@ci.renton.wa.us 3.. Kathy Keolker-Wheeter (425) 430-6501 —.email: kwheeler@ci.renton.wa.us 4. Terri Briere—.(425) 430-6501 —email: tbriere@cisenton.wa.us ci.renton.wa.u.s • .Also in support of project are Renton.citizens as.evidenced:by formation of the Renton Citizens for Cultural and Historical Preservation.Group.(CCHP)- directed by Historian Daniel Palmer. • .Joined.to.gether in.effort.with the.Renton Historic Society's' Preservation.Committee—led by Society Co-President Barbara Horton. • Endorsed by over 1,200.Citizen Petition signers supporting.the preservation.and.restoration.of the building. • Land.Buyer and Developer is also.in.support and.cooperating-with..the Renton.citizens' effort to preserve the.building—.especially,in the Centennial Year. 2001. • Professionals have volunteered to.do,painting,.plumbing, electrical— among other.things. Quick Reference: 1.. Daniel Palmer—Renton CCHP Managing Director(Save.Historic Building.Project) - contact Connie Hoffman for.appt. 2. Connie Hoffman— CCHP Contact/Coordinator— (425)254-8982 email:saveourhistory cr hotmail.com 3_ Barbara Horton-'Renton Historic Society Co-President/Preservation aammittee—(425)255-2330 hortonbb@aol.com 2 June 25,2001 Renton City Council Minutes Page 204 Transportation: 2001 Street Responding to Councilman Persson's inquiry regarding the 2001 Street Overlay Overlay Project Project,Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Gregg Zimmerman said he would provide Council with maps of SW 7th St. and he affirmed that the overlay of Lind Ave. SW between SW 16th and SW 27th Streets will occur this year,either with a change order to the 2001 Street Overlay contract, or under a separate contract. Transportation: Curb Ramp In response to Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler's inquiry,Councilman Persson Installation(ADA Compliant) affirmed that the report regarding the installation of ADA compliant curb ramps will be reported out of Transportation Committee at the next Council meeting. ORDINANCES AND The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption: RESOLUTIONS Resolution#3512 A resolution was read updating the City's Six-Year Transportation Transportation: Six-Year TIP Improvement Program(2002—2007). MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED (2002-2007) BY BRIERE,COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution#3513 A resolution was read declaring a moratorium on the approval of leases and Airport:Moratorium on subleases on the Renton Airport,establishing a public hearing date of July 9, Approval of Leases& 2001,and establishing a termination date of September 25,2001. MOVED BY Subleases PERSSON, SECONDED BY BRIERE,COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, Airport:Noise Issues& COUNCIL REFER THE AIRPORT NOISE ISSUES AND AIRPORT Business Plan BUSINESS PLAN TO THE AIRPORT ADVISORY COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Development Services: Lande Pointing out that the Lande Feed building has been identified as a significant Feed Building Preservation structure in the inventory of historic places by King County,it was MOVED LU R.cO-I11 BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY PERSSON,COUNCIL REFER TO THE PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE AND COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE ON 7/2/2001 THE REQUEST FOR FEASIBILITY STUDY ON THE RELOCATION AND RESTORATION OF THE LANDE FEED CENTRAL BUILDING,INCLUDING IDENTIFICATION OF COSTS, TIMING,PROSPECTIVE LOCATIONS,OWNERSHIP,POTENTIAL FINANCING SUCH AS PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS,AND POSSIBLE USES FOR THE BUILDING, IF RELOCATED.* Responding to Councilwoman Nelson's inquiry regarding moving the building so that it can continue to operate as a feed store or for saving it as a historic structure,Councilwoman Briere explained that it is her intent to save the Lande Feed building as a historic structure but the building could be viable as a business. Council discussion ensued regarding clarification of the scope and timing of information requested. Referencing past discussion to relocate the building to the City-owned parking lot located on Wells Ave. S and S.4th St. (behind McGowans Restaurant), Councilwoman Nelson expressed her opposition to the idea, saying that the loss of parking would be detrimental to the neighboring businesses. Councilman Parker agreed with Ms.Nelson,and pointed out that the City already contributes generously towards historic preservation;therefore he is reluctant for the City to engage in a lengthy study of this issue due to the potential costs. June 25,2001 Renton City Council Minutes Page 205 Councilmembers Persson,Keolker-Wheeler and Mayor Pro Tern Clawson agreed that additional sites and all options need to be explored. Councilwoman Briere added that the City needs to respond to the community's interest in preserving this structure,and emphasized that the issue is the historic value of the building rather than maintaining the feed store business. Councilwoman Nelson commented that many citizens expressed concerns about the loss of the Lande Feed store business, and she felt that the historical society should be laying the groundwork for the preservation of the building and not the City. Mayor Pro Tern Clawson emphasized that he does not expect the Administration to develop a plan to save the building,but rather to investigate what options are available with regards to using City property,the legal ramifications,and other related issues. *MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 9:25 p.m. MARIL J. TERSEN,CMC,City Clerk Recorder: Michele Neumann June 25,2001 Council Request Regarding Lande Feed Building June 25, 2001 Overall Assignment: Provide a feasibility analysis to save the Lande Feed building as a historic structure Council Parameters: • Do not slow down the proposed development of the site • Develop alternatives that save the building—not necessarily the feed store business • Have preliminary analysis ready for next week's (July 2nd) Committee of the Whole meeting • Provide a more detailed analysis for the following weeks' Planning &' Development meeting(July 9th) The feasibility analysis should include: - Legal ramifications of city involvement(what can we do) - Costs to rehabilitate all or portions of the building - Possible locations to relocate the building - Costs of relocation - Identify possible uses for the building Other issues: provide pros &cons to using a portion of the parking lot behind McGowan's restaurant as a relocation site. Provide pro &con analysis of the option of relocating(but not rehabilitating)the building, and holding it while other groups raise money to rehabilitate it. June 25,2001 Renton City Council Minutes Page 201 like to hook-up to the City's system and are unable to due to economic factors, he requested review of the policy. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCIL REFER THE MATTER TO THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE AND THEN TO THE FINANCE COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Citizen Comment: Clifford— Chris Clifford,2721 Talbot Rd. S.,Renton,98055,stated his unhappiness with Lande Feed Building Closure, how the City conducted the inspection and closure of the Lande Feed building, Declared Dangerous Building and specifically pointed out his displeasure that the closure occurred on a L-IA A -00.11 k Friday,thus causing the store to lose its weekend revenues. To prevent this from happening to another business,Mr. Clifford requested that the City change its building closure procedures in two ways. First,change the building inspection code so that building inspectors can only"red-tag" a building Monday through Thursday,and if the building is"red-tagged,"require an inspection by a structural engineer within 24 hours to verify the decision. Second,modify the appeal process to allow building owners the opportunity to seek a hearing within 24 hours of the building closure. Councilman Parker stated that business owners are responsible for maintaining their buildings and Craig Lande had been advised in the past to bring the building up to code. Mayor Pro Tem Clawson added that he opposed any City Code change that would take away the ability of the City to shut down a building that it deemed unsafe. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Council Minutes of June 18, Approval of Council minutes of June 18, 2001. Council concur. 2001 Court Case:Rosemary Grassi, Court Case filed in King County Superior Court by Susan Bonnell,237 SW CRT-01-006 153rd St., Seattle,98166,on behalf of Rosemary Grassi who seeks compensation for medical expenses and economic loss allegedly due to falling over a raised strip of asphalt in the crosswalk while crossing,the street in the vicinity of S. 5th St.and Cedar Ave. S. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Services. Human Resources: 2001 Human Resources&Risk Management Department requested the Relassifications reclassification of 31 positions in the Finance, Community Services and Planning/Building/Public Works Departments; and requested the allocation of $131,195 from unallocated fund balance to cover the costs of the reclassifications in 2001. Refer to Finance Committee. Human Resources: 2001 Human Resources&Risk Management Department recommended the Reclassifications(Information reorganization and reclassification of 11 positions within the Information Services Division) Services Division; and requested the allocation of$19,404 from unallocated fund balance to cover the cost of the reclassifications in 2001. Refer to Finance Committee. Utility: Earthquake-Damaged Utility Systems Division recommended approval of a consultant agreement in Elevated Water Tanks Repair, the amount of$63,380 with GeoEngineers for post earthquake repair and GeoEngineers upgrade of Rolling Hills and Highlands Elevated water tanks. Council concur. CAG: 00-165,Monterey Dr Utility Systems Division submitted CAG-00-165,Monterey Dr.NE&NE 3rd NE&NE 3rd St Storm System St. Storm System Replacement Project; and recommended approval of the Replacement Project,Monarch project,authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of$2,886.46, Excavating commencement of 60-day lien period, and release of retained amount of • June 18,2001 Renton City Council Minutes Page 193 Responding to Mayor Tanner's inquiry regarding the appropriateness of asking for staff study since this item is still under appeal,City Attorney Larry Warren explained that the letter to the Transportation Division as drafted does not ask for new information but asks for what codes are applicable and which ones were analyzed on the staff report. He emphasized that the Committee is asking for factual information only. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, • COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.* In response to Councilman Parker's inquiry regarding the length of time needed for staff to respond to the letter,Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Gregg Zimmerman responded that it will take approximately one week. *MOTION CARRIED. Community Services:Pavilion Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler asked for the cost of earthquake repairs to the Building Earthquake Damage Pavilion building,and inquired about the status of the retail brokerage services Repairs Cost Request contract for marketing the building. Mayor Tanner stated that he believed the retail brokerage services contract had expired; and said that he would provide her with information regarding the cost of repairs. ORDINANCES AND The following resolution was presented for reading and adoption: RESOLUTIONS Resolution#3511 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Public Works: Eastside Memorandum of Agreement by and between the City of Renton and King Interceptor Project,Memo of County for the Eastside Interceptor(ESI) Section 1 Capacity Restoration Agreement with King County Agreement,in order to establish the criterion by which the County's supplemental pipeline construction project will meet its overall objectives. MOVED BY PERSSON,SECONDED BY PARKER,COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Citizen Comment: Petersen— Councilman Persson reported receipt of a letter from Inez Petersen, 3306 Lake N 33rd P1 Condominium, Washington Blvd.N. #2,Renton, 98056, stating that the owner of a Potential Parking Violations condominium located at 805/807 N. 33rd Pl.has enlarged the parking • arrangement on her property without City approval. Ms.Petersen requested that the property owner be required to comply with pertinent parking,loading and driveway regulations to legally establish new parking on her premises; and if approval cannot be granted,require the property owner to discontinue use of the non-compliant parking spaces. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY BRIERE,COUNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE TRANSPORTATION COMMI1TEE. CARRIED. Community Services:Public Councilman Persson commented on the poor sound quality of the public Address Systems Improvement address systems used at the ribbon cutting ceremony at the new Senior Center Request Rotary Sun Room and other venues at which City presentations are made. He asked that staff investigate improving the portable public address systems. AUDIENCE COMMENT Chris Clifford,2721 Talbot Rd. S.,Renton, 98055, expressed his displeasure Citizen Comment: Clifford— with the City's handling of the closure of the Lande Feed Building and Lande Feed Building Closure, questioned why the building was not closed until Friday,when the City. Declared Dangerous Building conducted its inspection on Wednesday. He stated that the inspection process Lu was unfair and asked that Craig Lande be allowed to operate his store out of the front part of the building. 51}-oo-I-tl RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting June 18,2001 Council Chambers Monday,7:30 p.m. MINUTES Municipal Building CALL TO ORDER Mayor Jesse Tanner led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF TONI NELSON,Council President Pro Tern; RANDY CORMAN;DON COUNCILMEMBERS PERSSON;KING PARKER;TERRI BRIERE; KATHY KEOLKER- WHEELER. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY PERSSON,COUNCIL EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCILMEMBER DAN CLAWSON. CARRIED. CITY STAFF IN JESSE TANNER,Mayor; JAY COVINGTON, Chief Administrative Officer; ATTENDANCE LAWRENCE J.WARREN,City Attorney;MARILYN PETERSEN, City Clerk; GREGG ZIMMERMAN,Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator;CHIEF LEE WHEELER and DEPUTY CHIEF GLEN GORDON,Fire Department; SUE CARLSON,Economic Development Administrator;MIKE WEBBY,Human Resources Administrator;NEIL WATTS,Development Services Director; DEREK TODD,Assistant to the CAO; COMMANDER KATHLEEN MCCLINCY,Police Department. PRESS Oscar Halpert,Renton Reporter;Wendy Giroux,South County Journal PROCLAMATION A proclamation by Mayor Tanner was read declaring September 29,2001, to be Day of Concern for the "Day of Concern for the Hungry" in the City of Renton,and urging all citizens Hungry-September 29,2001 to join the Emergency Feeding Program to feed those who are hungry. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE PROCLAMATION AS READ. CARRIED. ADMINISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2001 and beyond. Items noted included: * The Army Corps of Engineers 404 permit for the Oakesdale Avenue Phase 2 project will be available early this week. However,this permit is conditioned upon obtaining the DOE 401 Water Quality Certificate,which the State Department of Ecology is not yet ready to release. Staff intends to work intensively on this issue in hopes of preventing a one-year delay on the completion of the project. * The City is sponsoring the Free Summer Lunch Program for children up to 18 years of age,on Monday through Friday,beginning June 18th and ending August 31st. For more information, contact Human Services Division at 425-430-6650. Development Services: Lande Neil Watts,Development Services Director,announced that the City's Feed Building Closure, Development Services Division,after consultation with the Fire Department, Declared Dangerous Building determined that the Lande Feed building located at 95 Burnett Ave. S.is a LU►� - Dangerous Building per the provisions of the Uniform Code for the Abatement pr-0 0-k-11 of Dangerous Buildings. The building has been posted, and the property owner has been served with notice that the building be closed immediately to the general public. The building will remain accessible to the owner and tenants June 18,2001 Renton City Council Minutes Page 191 for 30 days to allow for the orderly removal of personal property and inventory. Mr.Watts said that after 30 days,the owner must begin arrangements for demolition of the structure. Continuing,Mr.Watts explained that the Dangerous Building designation was based on the hazardous conditions within the structure and significant structural deficiencies within the building. He stated that a full interior inspection of the building was also conducted by the Fire Department on Thursday,June 14th, during which numerous violations of the Uniform Fire Code were discovered. Mr.Watts said that the structural deficiencies coupled with the fire hazards forced the City to deem this building a Dangerous Building. Stating that the property has been approved for redevelopment as a 118-unit apartment building,Mr.Watts reported that the City will work with the property owner or other interested parties in relocation efforts to preserve portions of the structure. He emphasized that the City will also work with the current tenants of the building, and find ways for the Lande Feed store tenant to conduct a clearance sale outside of the building. In addition,Mr.Watts displayed photos of the Lande Feed building showing the hazardous conditions present in the building. Mr.Watts read an electronic letter from Jean Lande Hennessey, sister of Philip Lande,owner of the Lande Feed Company property, 80 Lyme Rd.#1038, Hanover,NH, 03755, in which she states that she understands the reasons why the City closed operations of the Lande Feed Company building. Ms. Hennessey asked that the Council consider the issuance of a temporary permit to Craig Lande so he can close the business in an orderly way and sell his remaining inventory from the loading dock or from a tent in the parking area before the property transfers ownership in July. Responding to Council inquiry,Mr.Watts affirmed that the building is not structurally sound and that the two building tenants have 30 days to remove their belongings. AUDIENCE COMMENT Craig Lande,95 Burnett Ave.S.,Renton,98055,thanked the City for working Citizen Comment: Lande— with him so that he can conduct business outside of the Lande Feed store. In Lande Feed Building Closure, regards to the building itself, he explained that the photos Mr.Watts showed Declared Dangerous Building were of areas that are not open to the general public,and he pointed out that the public is only allowed into the store showroom and the loading dock. Mr. Lande reviewed some of the violations listed on the Fire Department's inspection report and emphasized that Fire Department officials,not structural engineers,made those determinations. He stressed that there is no public • danger in the public areas and never has been. Citizen Comment: Cross—St. Wade Cross,322 Morris Ave. S.,Renton,98055, expressed his concern that the Anthony Church Vacation, proposed closure of Whitworth Ave. S.requested by St.Anthony's Church has Whitworth Ave S between S been a closed process between the church and the City,with not much input 4th St&Parallel Alley(VAC- from or dialogue with the neighborhood. Mr. Cross pointed out that in addition 00-003) to the parking problems the potential closure of Whitworth Ave. S.would create,the closure would also affect public safety,convenience and access by emergency vehicles. He asked that Council not close the street, saying that Whitworth Ave. S. is an important part of the City's traffic grid. • CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: JUNE 15,2001 TO: JAY COVINGTON,CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER FROM: NEIL WATTS,DIRECTOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE UPDATE LANDE FEED BUILDING ABATEMENT (95 BURNETT AVE S) The City of Renton s Development Services Division, after consultation with the Renton Fire Department,has determined that the Lande Feed building is a Dangerous Building per the provisions of the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings. The building has been posted, and the property owner has been served with notice that the building is to be closed immediately to the general public. The building will remain accessible to the owner and tenants for 30 days to allow for the orderly removal of personal property and inventory. After 30 days the owner must begin arrangements for demolition of the structure. It remains our intent to allow for as much opportunity as possible to allow the property owner or other organizations to proceed with preservation efforts for portions of the structure. The designation as a Dangerous Building was based on the hazardous conditions within the structure and significant structural deficiencies within the building. The Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings lists 17 potential conditions which require that a building be deemed a dangerous building. A building may be deemed dangerous if it has any one of these conditions. It was determined after inspection of the building that 15 of these conditions applied. Based upon this information,prompt action was warranted. We have received complaints about excessive litter and trash in front of the building, extending into the street. Initial investigation of these complaints found that a recycling business had been established within the building. Citations were issued for the litter • problems, along with notice of potential zoning and fire regulation problems. The litter and trash outside of the building have not been removed, and further complaints have • been received. .Investigation of the ongoing recycling activities led to a full interior inspection of the building by the Fire Department. This inspection, which was completed on Thursday,June 14, found numerous violations of the Uniform Fire Code. Photos from the inspection were shared with Development Services for possible building code DUNE 15,2001 PAGE 2 violations. These photos clearly demonstrated building deficiencies throughout the structure. As a result of these unsafe conditions and defects, the building was deemed a dangerous structure for abatement purposes, and closed to the general public. The property has been approved for redevelopment as a 118 unit apartment building. The developer for this project, and pending owner of the property, has informed us that they intent to proceed promptly with the redevelopment. Their schedule is to begin abatement procedures for the large rat population in the building in one or two weeks. The removal of the rats must be completed prior to demolition of the structure. The developer continues to be willing to work with interested parties for relocation efforts of portions of the current building. The City will continue to implement its abatement procedures for the dangerous building in such a manner as to allow for a successful relocation effort by interested parties,while insuring that public safety is not compromised. • • - - i ::hcountyjournal.com-Officials shut down feed store,citing safety http://www.soutncountyJournai.conusucur s LUI yruumr 3 I4v4 =f-4 *. ''1 Kona . ," ;-:i Shouldn't you be enrolled in ' Conni C IFI ` ,* Key s Internet Banking? ; Journal i . . ) s 1 '' ''' 5 P online ''.Technology;;' ;05 Local news 7' Sc�Ufihc+aUrrtyjc�ur I.Cc m IpOici Cauritea �ii:: re Sports;y n r - otts. ..,ti, f tfip- l.W. ' A:• - Officials shut down feed store, citing Alitovretrirkl -aq:$4-'•k safety ;0:6ituaries--t ;~; Y fL`ocai,:,Al,.. tlacw. SF - ,.fit' t4'„y V^R;.k ite:Mar'. ''4 - ''; 2001-06-18 r� - a-� .r.. kSearch�4;rchl+lEi ti �+ ,1_ b :�•.1 by Wendy Giroux ` • 7 G i • I'Mown tomrr nit , Journal Reporter ID ' 170 r .-~ =S.--- RENTON--Lande Feed Co.'s doors are closed ._<;.Niiifi,r „u �. r=" perhaps for good a month ahead of schedule. E- ` 'kilrarl eetplace�-"-7. _ Store manager Craig Lande yesterday said Cro an e'�o'n HealthRenton city building officials red-tagged the Liv,ing;,.°k L<: #p ;_:;'R business as unsafe on Friday,closing it to the ;si.. :.A. . public. �W:orrien;s:rJournal:;Fr�� Este tainthent��:2. f.Trai :<tiz. •:: _..mv ,I," Tacoma developer PDSK Properties Inc. ." '"7°" t,' purchased several lots,including the feed store " ''>01,,s: 74.0'.l parcel, on Burnett Avenue South to build a Crossword2 '-s W.:- four-story apartment complex. j.Dllbert- .;,•-3 ,.. ,,, ,Horoscopes 'y= Before Friday,the store was slated to close in •<Movi'efone corrh;>?� ;.; mid-July, and Lande had planned to have a ;�KOM;O`:TU `�1, °:�; close-out sale to liquidate the rest of his feed �TVNListings'" r >",11 ,�,. ., �$�,�:�P; -, and merchandise. `igadhoneg9.1. ;::.:_:: =A`cee`ss.'tiilaga?rre;; Lande said that last Wednesday the fire marshal ;Dafe==F►rl,der:! ::':.71 „ toured the facilities and took photos.A different Subs6ertkie:`_, ; 3, building official came by Friday to shut it down, C reulatt p Dept::' he said. Jobs at thelS;CGYJz e, 'Contact=Us`'�•',`,- =.-: The areas deemed unsafe are closed to the public and kept locked,said Lande,who plans ,.r` ` ; to file an appeal of the decision with the city 4,r. r today. "I think it was a total stab in the back,"Lande said. "I think I was singled out because I've brought up the issue of historic preservation." City Administrator Jay Covington said last night that the building has been a source of "significant and serious"complaints for years. "I know it might be hard for him to understand, but the code violations have absolutely nothing to do with the historic preservation efforts," Covington said. Lande has been working with the Renton •Historical Society and a citizens'group to save at least the central,false-front section of the • of 2 06/18/2001 8:14 AM outhcountyjournal.com-Officials shut down feed store.citing safety http://www.southcountyjoumal.com/sited/story/html/57404 building from destruction. More than 700 people have signed a petition asking the City Council to take action to help preserve the building,he said. "It means a lot to people,"Lande said. "Some people come in here not even to buy things but just to soak up ambiance,de-stress or show their kids the chicks and bunnies." Seven people spoke in favor of the idea at the June 11 council meeting,and others have spoken at previous meetings. Barbara Horton,co-president of the Renton Historical Society,said she thought the city could have handled the situation differently. "It seemed like an unnecessarily heavy-handed thing to do,"Horton said. She said the two groups hope the city will support their efforts to save the central portion of the building,which measures about 1,800 square feet. "We're aware that they have surplus properties but they haven't brought those to the table for negotiation or discussion,"Horton said. Speaking at meetings this month,most council members seemed to support the idea of moving • the building if an appropriate piece of land is acquired,but were unsure of the feasibility. Lande said he hopes to find a way to sell the rest of his merchandise and continue to serve as a community resource on animals and gardening,as he has since age 6 when he worked at his grandfather's side. Wendy Giroux covers Renton.She can be reached at • wendy.giroux@southcountyjournal.com or 253-872-6683. South County Journal 600 South Washington, Kent WA 98032 Hours:Monday-Friday 8:00am to 5:00pm Phone:253-872-6600 a Fax:253-854-1006 -` `'.. 4 :...:r.:•r -•b.•r..eta,u''.f All materials Copyright©2001 Horvitz Newspapers,Inc. Any questions?See our contact page. • • nc�1R/nnnt Rc14IAM CITY - IF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works De artment ..1� .� �. P • Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator • • June 15,2001 . NOTICE AND ORDER • Craig P.Lande . - Dba Lande Feed. 95 Burnett Ave S Renton,WA 98055 SUBJECT: ABATEMENT AS A;DAN.GEROUS BUILDING, "LANDE FEED" LOCATED AT 95 BURNETT AVENUE;SOUTH, CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF DING, WA. 98055. LEGAL:DFSCRIPTION TOBIN H H-D C#37 ORIGINAL TOWN NOW CITY OF RENTOM..• • Dear Mr.Lande: - Section 201.2 Inspections of the 1997 Uniform-:Code-For The-Abatement of Dangerous Building states: The Health Officer, the Fire Marshall and?the ,Buili1in Official are hereby authorized to make such inspections and take such actions as may be.required to`enforce the provisions of this Code. Inspection, documentation and photographic evidence has led to the determination that the above subject structure is a dangerous building according to the provisions as contained in•Section 302 of the 1997 Uniform Code For The Abatement of Dangerous Buildings as adopted by the City of Renton by reference. (Ordinance 4546,7-24-1995). For cross-reference and statutory authority see also Renton Municipal Code Section 4-9-050A. . The following provision of Section 302 DANGEROUS BUILDING of the 1997 Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, #'s 1; 2; 3;4;5; 7; 8;9; 10; 11; 12; 13; 15; 16 and 17 (attached and highlighted),have been found to apply to the above subject building. In accordance with Section 401.2,subsection 3.2(attached and highlighted),the building shall immediately be vacated and closed to all public access. 'In accordance with Section 401.2, subsection 3.3 (also attached), arrangements shall be made within thirty days (30) service of this Notice and Order for future demolition. During this thirty-day period, the owner may remove personal property and inventory_ However,no business activities,whatsoever,shall be allowed to be conducted from the building. • • 1901-2001 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer � ,' • You,having legal interest in the above subject building,may appeal from this Notice and Order pursuant to Section 4-9-050D1 APPEALS: Authority and Process: The Board of Appeals, under Chapter 5 of the "Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings" shall be the Hearing Examiner.. Appeals may • be filed pursuant to RMC 4-8-110,Appeals. • If you have further questions,you may call me at 425-430-7280. • Sincerely, • • Larry M Building Official Development Services Cc: . File/C01-0275 Neil Watts,Development Services Director • Gregg Zimmerman,Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Robert Arthur,Code Compliance Inspector tl PROOF OF SERVICE.,• k c• fs ' eAr SIGNED Ka . s x. •')- : DATE WITNESSED 0.44 g�,� a �� �� � TI LEA > • %_f SC • i" fv'•'+7�y y{.q4~Z 2•" ••°s .^ ,q� a to W ' -f • ..Fi`y,eXr° 'a�, _. - - - --eke �"•'` ..e4014 nap .,'i p xxr'3}t d ' `SY ,� ' •' r .40 • • • • • • • • • • 1997 ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUI?I'v 3S 301 J 302 Chapter 3 DEFINITIONS SECTION 301 —GENERAL 7. Whenever any portion thereof has wracked, warped, buckled 0r settled to such an extent that walls or other structural For the purpose of this code,certain terms,phrases,words and portions have materially less resistance to winds or earthquakes their derivatives shall be construed as specified in either this chap- than is required in the case of similar new construction. ter or as specified in the Building Code or the Housing Code. $ Whenever the'building or structure,or any portion thereof, Where terms are not defined,they shall have their ordinary ac- be:.. • of dilapidation,deterioration or decay;(ii)faulty con- Webster'srir cepted meanings within the context with which they are used. struction; the removal,movement or instability of any portion Third New International Dictionary of the English Lan- (iii) guage, Unabridged copyright 1986,shall be construed as provid- of the ground necessary for the purpose of supporting such build- ing (iv)the deterioration,decay or inadequacy of its foundation; ordinary accepted meanings. Words used in the singular ing; include the plural and the plural the singular.Words used in the or(v)any other cause,is Rely to partially or completely collapse. masculine gender include the feminine and the feminine the mas- 9. Whenever,for any reason,the building or structure,or any • culine portion.there if,is manifestly unsafe for the purpose for which it is BUILDING CODE is the Uniform Building Code promul- being used. gated by the International Conference of Building Officials, as 10. Whenever the exterior walls or other vertical structural adopted by this jurisdiction. meri hers:tist Mea or buckle to such an extent that a plumb line DANGEROUS BUILDING is any building or structure passing throughn the center of gravity does not fall inside the 'deemed to be dangerous under the provisions of Section 302 of middle one third of the base. this code. 11..Whenever the building or structure,exclusive of the foun- HOUSING CODE is the Uniform Housing Code promulgated dat?gn;:sholvs 33 percent or more damage or deterioration of its by the International Conference of Building Officials,as adopted supporting member or members,or 50 percent damage or deterio- by this jurisdiction ration of its nonsupporting members,enclosing or outside walls or coverings. • 12..Whenever the building or structure has been so damaged by SECTION 302-DANGEROUS BUILDING fire;wind,earthqu ke or flood,or has become so dilapidated or deteriorated as to become(i)an attractive nuisance to children;(ii) For the purpose of this code,any building or structure which has a harbor for vagrants,Criminals or immoral persons;or as to(iii) any or all of the conditions or defects hereinafter descnbed shall enable persons to resort thereto for the purpose of committing un- be deemed to be a dangerous building,provided that such condi- lawful or immoral acts. lions or defects exist to the extent that the life,health,property or • safety of the public or its occupants are endangered. 13. Whenever any building or structure has been constructed, 1.-Whenever_an .door, aisle, passageway,stairway or other exist"s'or is maintained in violation of any specific requirement or .r. y yt_;.... y. rolubition applicable to such buildingor structure provided by me , e t l 'f'a ;ii!ntwicis.f e xze.oras_ ot eo an ed f this jurisdiction, as specified in the P PP the,building regulations o a to provide safe and adequate means of extin ease of fire or pan- Building Code or Housing Code,or of any law or ordinance of this ic. state or jurisdiction relating to the condition,location or structure 2.;.Whenever the walking surface of any aisle,passageway, of buildings: stairway or other: ens of exit is so warped,:arorn,.loose,.totn,or 14. Whenever any building or structure which,whether or not otherwise unsafe as to not provide safe and adequate means of exit erected in accordance with all applicable laws and ordinances,has • in case of fire or panic. in any nonsupporting part,member or portion less than 50 percent, 3..Whenever the stress in any materials,member or portion or in any supporting part,member or portion less than 66 percent theretS •du .to all dead and live loads,is more than one and one of the(i)strength,(ii)fire-resisting qualities or characteristics,or half times the working stress or stresses allowed in the Building (iii)weather-resisting qualities or characteristics required by law Code-for new buildings of similar structure,purpose or location, in the case of a newly constructed building of like area,height and 4. Whenever any portion thereof has been damaged by fire, occupancy in the same location. earthquake;wild,flood or by any other cause,to such an extent 15. Whenever a building or structure,used or intended to be that the structural strength or stability thereof is materially less used:for'dwelling purposes,because of inadequate maintenance, than it was before such catastrophe and is less than the minimum dilapidation,decay,damage,faulty construction or arrangement, requirements of the Building Code for new buildings of similar inadequate light,air or sanitation facilities,or otherwise,is deter- structure,purpose or location. mined by the health officer to be unsanitary,unfitfor human habi- 5. Whenever any portion or member or appurtenance thereof is ration or in such a condition that is l kely to cause sickness or likely.to:failil.or to become detached or dislodged,or to collapse disease. and thereby injure persons or damage property. 16. Whenever any building or structure,because of obsoles- tion of a building,or any member,appur- cenee ddapirl4ted condition,deterioration,damage,inadequate ¢. Whenever any portion exits,lack of sufficient fire-resistive construction,faulty electric de,nt or ornamentation on the exterior thereof is not of snffi- wing,gas connections or heating apparatus,or other cause,is de- cient strength or stability, or is not so anchored, attached or termined by the fire marshal to be a fire hazard. fastened in place so as to be capable of resisting a wind pressure of one half of that specified in the Building Code for new buildings of 17. Whenever any building or structure is in such a condition as similar structure,purpose or location without exceeding the work- to constitute a•pbblic nuisance known to the common law or in eq- ing stresses permitted in the Building Code for such buildings. uity jurisprudence. 5 1997 ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS ' DINGS • 401 403 Chapter 4 NOTICES AND ORDERS OF BUILDING OFFICIAL SECTION 401 —GENERAL building official or disclosed from official public records: the Commencement of Proceedings. When the building of- holder of any mortgage or deed of trust or other lien or encum- 401.1brance of record;the owner or holder of any lease of record;and ficial has inspected or caused to be inspected any building and has the holder of any other estate or legal interest of record in or to the found and determined that such building is a dangerous building, building or the land on which it is located.The failure of the build- the building official shall commence proceedings to cause the re- ing official to serve any person required herein to be served shall pair,vacation or demolition of the building. not invalidate any proceedings hereunder as to any other person 401.2 Notice and Order. The building official shall issue a no- duly served or relieve any such person from any duty or obligation tice and order directed to the record owner of the building.The no- imposed by the provisions of this section. tice and order shall contain: 401.4 Method of Service. Service of the notice and order shall 1. The street address and a legal description sufficient for iden- be made upon all persons entitled thereto either personally or by tification of the premises upon which the building is located. mailing a copy of such notice and order by certified mail,postage prepaid,return receipt requested,to each such person at their ad- 2. A statement that the building official has found the building dress as it appears on the last equalized assessment roll of the to be dangerous with a brief and concise description of the condi- county or as known to the building official.If no address of any tions found to render the building dangerous under the provisions such person so appears or is known to the building official,then a of Section 302 of this code. copy of the notice and order shall be so mailed,addressed to such 3. A statement of the action required to be taken as determined person,at the address of the building involved in the proceedings. by the building official. The failure of any such person to receive such notice shall not af- fect the validity of any proceedings taken under this section.Serv- 3.1 If the building official has determined that the building or structure must be repaired,the order shall require that ice by certified mail in the manner herein provided shall be effective on the date of mailing. all required permits be secured therefor and the work physically commenced within such time(not to exceed 4015 Proof of Service. Proof of service of the notice and order 60 days from the date of the order)and completed with- shall be certified to at the time of service by a written declaration in such time as the building official shall determine is under penalty of perjury executed by the persons effecting serv- reasonable under all of the circumstances. • ice, declaring the time, date and manner in which service was 3.2.If the building official has determined that the building made.The declaration,together with any receipt card returned in or`structure must be vacated,the order shall require that acknowledgment of receipt by certified mail shall be affixed to the building or structure shall. be vacated within a time the copy of the notice and order retained by the building official. . certain from the date of the order as determined by the • SECTION 402—RECORDATION OF NOTICE AND building official to be reasonable. ORDER 3.3 If the building official has determined that the building or structure must be demolished,the order shall require If compliance is not had with the order within the time specified that the building be vacated within such time as the therein, and no appeal has been properly and timely filed, the building official shall determine is reasonable (not to building official shall file in the office of the county recorder a cer- exceed 60 days from the date of the order);that all re- tificate describing the property and certifying(i)that the building quired permits be secured therefor within 60 days from is a dangerous building and(ii)that the owner has been so noti- the date of the order; and that the demolition be corn- fled.Whenever the corrections ordered shall thereafter have been pleted within such time as the building official shall de- completed or the building demolished so that it no longer exists as termine is reasonable. a dangerous building on the property described in the certificate, the building official shall file a new certificate with the county re- 4. Statements advising that if any required repair or demolition corder certifying that the building has been demolished or all re- work.(without vacation also being required)is not commenced quired corrections have been made so that the building is no within the time specified,the building official(i)will order the longer dangerous,whichever is appropriate. building vacated and posted to prevent further occupancy until the work is completed,and(ii)may proceed to cause the work to SECTION 403—REPAIR,VACATION AND be done and charge the costs thereof against the property or its DEMOLITION . owner. 5. Statements advising(i)that any person having any record The following standards shall be followed by the building official title or legal interest in the building may appeal from the notice (and by the board of appeals if an appeal is taken)in ordering the . and order or any action of the building official to the board of ap- rrepair,vacation or demolition of any dangerous building or struc- re: peals,provided the appeal is made in writing as provided in this code and filed with the building official within 30 days from the 1. Any building declared a dangerous building under this code date of service of such notice and order;and(ii)that failure to ap- shall be made to comply with one of the following: peal will constitute a waiver of all right to an administrative hear- 1.1 The building shall be repaired in accordance with•the ing and determination of the matter. current building code or other current code applicable 401.3 Service of Notice and Order. The notice and order,and to the type of substandard conditions requiring repair; any amended or supplemental notice and order,shall be served or _ upon the record owner and posted on the property;and one copy 1.2 The building shall be demolished at the option of the thereof shall be served on each of the following if known to the -building owner;or 7 Page 1of1 - ..� ,;•_ _a..+ =� .�5��� "fir. , - % "t `'� •-=ce$-"L` . .. '�.- ..T. . i- .. - .0100,1 r \ ., , '/ -`� '! 7 I1 i t: _ ............ '';'; :.L. laillrANAIDE •1 'F E O C O -- _,�•- II 1 ._ ' li rf., ,,. • son VIfh !!iii • 11 � f.7l.�rrrr ��. RI ... a _.-. t f` - ` 3 `•~mow 7. • file://A:\DCIM\100MSDCF\DSC001 I6.JPG 06/18/2001 0 w CDO fr.y�:' �Y, ".ice CV 00 a.) 4 .—. cet Q' , 1' O \ 1 i • \,, y [ ,y ' , 1 i 1 , 1 t#i n) Cis 1 V% , .t \,� t .1�b1 y f ti•`:��, a ,' `�Y 4 ll ', ', \I ' ,, \I. ''\by I ‘‘ it ,' ,-? \ ",.MY"�c'.a.L1 6 t 4 M . !a'i. . [t i. -:. .� Vt � �1 ' { , \ 4 / r, .. - '.. .'..1:.;.%:..i...X,,,xz.7,7,,,,.....- C 1' tt t ski. \IA ' 1 \ il . ...; \ \\.A.\..1 r.‘1... - 4......:4..._s....‘ .V.,‘0.,4 4 t‘,.: , .......1—-............. ,i L yam. A ',- a? . w Page 1 of 1 f@'^`^ ,. ='. .� .'` fit', • i I. :,", / r /4,0,641..i,e•;,....,,:,:'...I4i,..., . ; i . ..- , r '.,,,:l.,.. :, • ., ;.*?:-.t r ;••4c TVel i C: 'Wbe.�r�a4. s,.rci:.ett a t-,4..,.y.- rze�._ ro,0`i �4" '�" t. t-„�C 4 k ,>ti • ,ti :,lt' ri I • �ur � j I: k `1 t .j r`' ♦ 1 t y' ,, 1�. ,f1 IN'' -. J,�— 1 7w,,„ i, ...r ara • • 1, 41 .,. .. i: ,. , _v _ ,-- -,71„.=,74.- • ;...„ .., .. . ......,;:„.. ., . 44,* ....A, , . _. ......1.:;_,_,. .... .7...„ . . ...... . ... • ..... . _- - ,"„.......--(1 , 1 .„..... _ ._ ..,-4 -� rya 8 ` Offk: '.a _ , .. .:.,•r , \ i . V -- .�+1 i '` F#�","ti"fa{"'zxk.a.a ?/-ty may..- -- _.''�� file://A:\DCIM\100MSDCF\DSC00102.JPG 06/18/2001 • Page 1 of 1 file://A:\DCIM\100MSDCF\DSC00095.JPG 06/18/2001 Page 1of1 • rf . • r ' * .�. ..4.✓•'t t..r...r.h. - - sd�iWRl+ta sk nNv _ _ _• t i;� ��` f}i• • • • • • - r` aft- file://A:\DCIM\100MSDCF\DSC00099.JPG 06/18/2001 Page 1 of 1 - .. **45d 't ; ,*...a-- is` '. ..:^. •. • l it r4 -- , ,,...... • _.-1 -=,aaialuk.=-- IMP ... . „•-r . T " :!3 Via_ . .�..... �.,,a• aw .�...` '+y ► �-S � r .,'9 " Ty '^-' T' '+' ..1 tea. T .to m f i . 1 S'- =n.=- r j1i•��ii : sue° -..11.� 0. file://A:\DCIM\100MSDCF\DSC00032.JPG 06/18/2001 Page 1 of 1 • �b1 ti -- • -- :— .• .-• . - _ - --- _- -�'.` = :_ . �_ "lam : - ...__....-T!�„r._. _.. .. : -' •y .ram,• •►� -• - •'•�" .w• +•.. .-,_.. =+ �'.�r�. .... ilk _ 1154.4.': .. _.---•-- -I r . iaR• J .o'er' •• •-. �..-� .r.r a _���' % ' '''-'tea f►. • } -' ., • I......-4,`.14 riii..p r� s _ lr v • _ ,...,E • �- 1 d • file://A:\DCIM\100MSDCF\DSC00031.JPG 06/18/2001 Page 1 of 1 • • •. • A - , 1,', 'I P,,. kl-'got:,. : ,,::,-.;•:.,4,,,,,,,;$.z .4r.,,. , ...,„.,:•, ;•,. ., :•,..i, '-0. . -e ;. . . . t Jr ‘, . It , xg•-••••, Si N 0 , , ...N. ,-- r , " , .........— k.:1 4::0't r 1 11 • or .1#*'"'" al •a i Isonia* - . .= •' , $ —- — I I IV 1 i , 1..... . . .,...: i ' _. ,• ' Id": PPL.7.M,' / I:• .v. ' I . - 17 =3/, _* li /IffSr=0Z , 't• T ,k f ' • ....... k ......, ,4 ik r 1--;341. •-• -' rtIE, II *al --;'• 1 7.1.- -__. ... '- 'v.*"'7 : '.• f!' ft:::-.:•:41P7-4 -•r' -- 1-4:•„„ - v i- 1 - " • . p-m• • • _ . - ..,... • .- — a' • $ `ft .4:.4 , rif° • file://A:\DCIM\100MSDCF\DSC00092.JPG 06/18/2001 Page 1of1 1 • i Ty it file://A:\DCIM\100MSDCF\DSC00061.JPG 06/18/2001 Page 1 of 1 K i • _•"�-� - LE`-4:fie =., r 1 1 { PI, y . • 1 `. • t �. file://A:\DCIM\100MSDCF\DSC00074.JPG 06/18/2001 Page 1of1 sue' .` : ors i elr t• t 1 r alri IN , • 4. : `)( ,, '. 0.. , ri 4\,.. A- , ' \ A •:11.... ''" !,. '.' .`t, ";. ' k. i tom. 1`• ,- ♦ file://A:\DCIM\100MSDCF\DSC00014.JPG 06/18/2001 • Page 1 of 1 • :: its' • • `. • • _ .JIB } .S-A S' + ' % • ' ..r' r y .'R: r file://A:\MVC-003S.JPG 06/18/2001 Page 1 of 1 • s • ♦ .' '`'. -'( N v. '4 , ''' �.e ..* "•. -� ems.- try . ! : -( :.�. ..�-.4 I:L•I+ ~ ...yti et • + J L1 ..ate S } .1.• • _'�� L � i � • file://A:\DCIM\100MSDCF\DSC00029.JPG 06/18/2001 Page l of l • t,+\``J'`_`'�J .� i.,y Fr i 4 >-. N. r . `• � rl I • w .Z.! • 06/18/2001 file://A:\MVC-018S.JPG Marilyn Petersen- Re: Redevelopment of the Lande Feed Co. _ Page 1 From: Marilyn Petersen To: John W. Hennessey Subject: Re: Redevelopment of the Lande Feed Co. Dear Ms. Hennessey: Thank you for your e-mail regarding the Lande Feed building. Copies will be distributed to all Councilmembers prior to the Council meeting this evening. If I can provide additional information, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Marilyn Petersen City Clerk/Cable Manager 425-430-6502 >>> John W. Hennessey<John.W.Hennessey@Dartmouth.EDU>06/18/01 04:41 PM >>> Dear Ms. Petersen, As Renton City Clerk, I hope you will convey the following message to the Renton City Council at its meeting tonight at 7:30 pm. Dear City Council Members, I am the sister of Philip Lande and have been acting on his behalf on several business matters, including the sale of the Lande Feed Company. In this message I am speaking on behalf of my brother and on my own behalf for the Lande family. I understand that the City of Renton has closed operations of the Lande Feed Company property because the property poses problems of health and safety. We have been aware that the buildings have increasingly posed such problems and understand the reasons for the city's action. The condition of the buildings has in fact been one of the principal reasons that the property was placed on the market. We have been pleased with the actions of the City of Renton in making it possible for the sale and redevelopment of the property to proceed in an expeditious manner and believe that the projected future use of the property will be of substantial benefit to the community. The Lande family cares a great deal about the prosperity of the city of Renton which has been such a positive community for my father's, then my brother's and now my nephew's business. We are expecting that the property will be transfered in July. The factthat the property can no longer be safely used by the public, however, poses problems for my nephew Craig Lande in the closing down of his business. He had expected to be able to liquidate his inventory during the next three weeks and if that opportunity is foreclosed it will mean a considerable loss of revenue. Could I ask that the Council consider the issuance of a temporary permit to make it possible for him to close the business in an orderly way without jeopardizing the safety of the public? A three-week temporary permit whereby he could sell his remaining inventory either from the loading dock or from a tent in the parking area would help him a great deal and could, I hope, be done in a way which ensures the public's safety. I would be very grateful if the City of Renton, through the.good offices of the Mayor and Council, could find some way to help him conclude the feed store business which has been so important to my family for the last 74 years. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Sincerely, Jean'Lande Hennessey - - - -- - '-- --- -- ----- - - --- --- ' ' _'Page�� ��__-_ _� - - � o� ' -� - - - ---- - - ' . - 80 Lyme Road# 1038 Hanover NHO3755 ba|: O03'S43-2282 fox: G03-O43-3020 e-nnoi\: Jaan.Henneaoey@Oortrnouth.edu CC: Jesse Tanner; Susan Carlson ' ' - ` PREVCO LLC B 253 627 4049 03/22/01 15:06 EJ :02/02 NO:167 ii.-4,.- - .�,UJ1 10 : _ ... i W F ihl i:,- 42 .. _170 _ - ) -- 00 -- 17I1sti Willard's Post Control Company a tl 0 •fit 1\0s;ll1talllill R Cottlittirt:iidl • illdtl"iitli;ll 's, i 1 13811 N.E. 128th Place)$200 / --? "f I - . Kirkland,WA 98034 426-820-1980 • Fix: 428-823-8170 E-mail! wlllarda.petffiveriion.net / — Rccl(-- lac)6 March 23, 2001 Paul Krako;President PDSK Properties,Inc. 621 Pacific Ave. 0300 Tacoma, WA. 98402-4611 Dear Paul, Following is my proposal to exterminate rodents at the Linde Feed Mill and associated building locations. As we discussed you are not concerned at this point with pigeons or feral cats that also inhabit.Linde Feed. wD --v It is my understanding the an t after the mill is vacant we will have as much time as needed to exterminate the existing rodent population. It is very difficult to approximate population numbers, but there is evidence of a M-rt bealthOedent population. The species in question is probably Norway rats. t My plan is to"flood" the vacant buildings with several types of devices. These will include slug,traps and / �,,,, rodent bait stations. I will use single feed rodent bait in the stations. This product insures the rodent receives a , -� f:)4 —f lethal dose with only one feeding. All bait stations will be secured to prevent non-target pests from accessing &e,u ,l the bait, Bait stations wilt also be placed around the exterior perimeter of the buildings. They will be locked -` and secured. By placing between ion.200 snap traps inside the buildings I hope to trap as many rats possible '`c"" / in the shortest period of time. All trams and halt stations will be serviced every otherday. My�oa1 is to _C e�OC.4 complete this process in twn weeks. I think timing is critical. I do not want rodents moving from the Lande j site to neighboring buildings. I believe after the buildings are vacant much of the food supply and harborage r€,r up-U,C_/. will also be removed, That is why I want to place as many baiting stations and snap traps As I possibly. I want y,tse - It_ to maintain an intensive trapping and bailing campaign while the rodents are disturbed by the activity of ' )^ Linde Feed vacating. 'r Cost of this service is S 1950.00 plus tax for the initial baiting/trapping. Every other day service is S 150.00 y 1"1'.5--' plus tax. T estimate five services after the initial. If more services are needed we can accommodate those at Y `� the$130.00 rate. l/p'/j44,44 Sincerely, i2-1(4::. Gee- p►r4 - -u-17:C rOt5 aAf-t— • Rick A.Mix qo . tit:a aL— 171- - V . f4 t 14 7 v S. King Co. Bellevue N. Seattle S. Seattle North Bend CleF uin Ellensburg , 206424-1Ir7 425-451-728R 206-368-8184 206-246-1992 425-831-6773 509-674-5042 109-96>2-204-1 Helga Jaques,Artist 1311415811,'N .'Sg R nfo A pon� , 6383 .,',,r. helgajagues@seanef.com..ef,----- . . , . . RECEIVED Renton,.June 6th 2001 JUN 1 1 2001 MAYORS OFFICE To: The Renton Reporter 15, South Grady Way - Suite 110 • Renton, Wa.98055 • • To: His Honor Jesse Tanner City Hall 1055, S.Grady Way Renton,Wa."98055 - • Subject: . Keeping a landmark , . • , Renton is celebrating its 100 years of History and what does the City plan to do?Tearing down one of the oldest buildings in town in order to make space for more Condos! • - Renton-does not have the wealth of Bellevue,the chic image of Kirkland-but it makes up to it in-the'feeling of a real town,with many old time residents.The reshaping of the downtown core is a real success,story,but not everything has to be made new.Future shoppers and browsers need to feel that this is a real place-a people , friendly place-different from a shopping mall. As the poster artist for"River Days"2001,a longtime resident(coming to this town 35 years ago from Austria) . I always had a special fondness for the LANDE FEEDSTORE".Craig runs that store in a personal manner, - which you can find only in small country communities.His knowledge and.advice reaches far beyond the - . regular feed store wisdom. True-the store needs some repairs,but that story about 600 rats is pure fiction.'His ' eats take care of that problem. .' . • Helga Jaques,Artist 13114 .:: Ave SE R of trifik4839 helgajaques@seanef.com• • After speaking with a Health Official I was informed,that many upper-class communities have rats galore,due to the pet population and their outdoor feeding dishes. Money is tight as always-but there must be a way to channel some of it towards the restoration effort of that store. Once gone, it will never be replaced. Americans flock by the thousands to Europe every year and come back with wonder ir3 their eyes from seeing so , much proof of history. Tourists taking the Dinner Train could get a whiff of our history(as humble as•it may seem in comparison)if we only could preserve a few old buildings. . One of my ideas would be a Donation booth-set up by the"Historical Society"-during our"Renton Rivet- Days". Also a raffle sale could be held at this same event. I for one would be willing to create a painting of the Feed store to be donated for this proposed raffle sale. The money obtained would go toward restoring the store. Sincerely • - Helga Jaques - • . o . • /3114, 58 th.Av: SE • Renton,Wa. 09059 /► 1 r . • CITY OF RENTON JUN 01 2001 RECEIVED 2300 Jefferson Ave. N.E., A-204 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Renton, WA 98056 425-271-2733 Dan Clawson Renton City Council 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mr. Clawson, I read with interest the recent story in the Renton Reporter about the near-certain demise of the old wooden building which houses Lande Feed. A historic preservation ordinance would benefit Renton in many ways, and now is the time to start crafting it. I am not a member of any preservation group but I felt it was important for you to hear from an interested citizen who is not knowingly aligned with any particular person or agenda. Renton has a great deal to offer that other suburban cities do not: a relatively authentic and charming downtown area, with older brick buildings and mid-century construction complementing the handsome new development. I urge you not to underestimate the value this mix has as"destination neighborhood" to visitors from all over the Puget Sound areas For example, downtown Kirkland has the advantage of being on the water; however, it has very little left to compare with Renton's 1920s- era feel, with the warmth of red brick buildings that have housed businesses for years and years. Renton could make good use of its older buildings as part of.a larger draw;.travel to see historic.places is booming. And "historic" doesn't necessarily mean that someone famous built lived or launched a business in Renton. People can find a Gap or a McDonalds in any neighborhood; they want to see something different, that doesn't exist anywhere else, and are intrigued to discover unique, small businesses like Renton Western Wear and Cedar River Barbecue along the way. I moved to Renton from Capitol Hill a year ago, and did not even know Renton had a downtown, much less one as inviting, unspoiled, and original in feeling as Renton is, even though I have lived in Seattle my entire life. Renton has so much to offer outsiders (I'm digressing, but outside of Alaska there aren't many downtown areas where you can actually see salmon swimming upriver to spawn and then walk a few blocks to sit down to a fine meal at a place like Jubilante). Development • that preserves downtown's essential feel, along with even the slightest publicity efforts (I like the idea of a sign on I-405, both for historic and natural wonders) could really bring new and sustainable economic support to downtown. I also want you to know that there are federal programs designed to help developers restore and preserve older buildings. The Wallingford Center was restored by Lorig and Associates, a Seattle firm specializing in such projects. Money is available to convert parts of old buildings into rental housing for specific income levels in downtown areas; Seattle's Wallingford Center was once the Interlake Elementary School. Lorig and Associates converted the upper floors into lovely apartments, which are very much in demand; the lower floor is an eclectic mix of shops, none of them part of large chains, drawing people from all over the region. Lorig and Associates also took on the old Queen Anne High School, successfully converting it to apartments, which are also both charming, affordable, and extremely popular. In addition, the National Trust for Historic Preservation supports a program called "Main Street" which helps cities of all sizes encourage preservation and economic development. According to statistics on the Main Street web page, since 1980 the program has helped 1,600 communities, accounted for public and private reinvestment in these communities of$15.2 billion, generated 52,000 new businesses (this is net) and 206,000 jobs. I invite you to spend a little time on the Trust's web page to read individual towns' success stories. Perhaps there is no building quite like the Interlake School in Renton, but the older brick structures along Third really do deserve some consideration before they become so dilapidated that there is no choice but to tear them down. If Renton had a preservation ordinance, city planners and a part-time preservation officer could at least begin the process of deciding which buildings merit a historic designation. Finally, a preservation ordinance needn't be highly restrictive to • property,owners; a variety of Washington..cities.,have ordinances.that rely on voluntary cooperation, but also allow property owners tax credits in certain circumstances. I learned a lot about historic preservation in just a few hours of web searches and talking with friends more well-informed on the topic than I. I know that staff could gather a lot of good information in a short period of time and give you many options to consider. I urge you to take the first steps toward enacting a historic preservation ordinance in the very near future. Renton can only gain by your action. Yours sincerely, sci� Turner • r - ,, f gyp, ry• _ •f.,' ;F l• • ,' ,' - ; 1 'i 'r t • t., i 1 t' t r' J — t;t ` .. �,t.• �.• ' BCD I , I i T, •'I �.. , P---.. �'Y• ' rt v� ,'I •'1. • .I, r� � / •k, • I/ '1 I .S ' 'r '�.p.`v. ' •� ' / ' = ,. L,. i II ,.,.•�,t`,. •l ,1' ,q'!u• ,i '1 • It`y r;•1 ? 1 r I / ,,j �•i.'.�,•'! 'F •� r', I' !• tl. • � •l, 'r • r + •1 • A. ' ' ' i +'1• ;1' vs r n \ y�rr i • , , 1,'r, ,r-l Sri ,t' n' 1 ,II• 1,•', ,- i' 'I'' - . y • �i• • • FIRST :':.1 t • I. 'y I ,i' ,.r q'• '1, .�,•, ; ,:k-.' y , i' .� `•7 /,) 1111 hF • ti' 1 Y t, ' '/ 1,r,I:�•'I ``.1 ,i ,` �.\ '+' Ill I`r. I1.. r• ! ~ It •, .. t... ) ,1,, , , .,. ,, f . , , „ . • .,'+ 'j ' „ r� •I 1 I» ., I ,,rt .I r t Sr 1 , .....) . r- .' . '• 'r-- , ,, , : , • .411111P: ' ' i'.•' • •' . , r • , .1 . .. ,., ,F; is p ° P : ..1" 1. r ''...1 Eib , ,1p 411.11k ';.1.'.I„• !P ': 1 P P 1 P ", ''r PP'. ' ;1 .:.:: , :' ..' _,' T'P \I .. ,1 ,,.. -� CITY OF RENTON ..lr. City Clerk Jesse Tanner,Mayor Marilyn J.Petersen June 1, 2001 Priscilla Turner 2300 Jefferson Avenue NE, A-203 Renton, WA 98056 Re: Historic Preservation Dear Ms. Turner: _ Thank you for your letter regarding preservation and restoration of Renton's older 'buildings. Copies will be distributed to Mayor Tanner and members of the Renton City Council. This topic is currently pending in the Council's Planning and Development Committee. Your name will be added to the parties of record list for notification when this matter is scheduled for discussion by the Committee.' If I can provide additional information or assistance,please feel free to contact me. - Sincerely, • _ - • Marilyn . ersen City Clerk/Cable Manager • • cc: Mayor Jesse Tanner Members, Renton City Council , ••Jay Covington, CAO • Sue Carlson, Administrator 6 aT v :1055 South Grady Way- Renton, Washington 98055 - (425) 430-6510 /FAX (425) 430-6516 T,;•: '= _. - • �,, ,T-- CITY ,F RENTON ..lL City Clerk Jesse Tanner,Mayor Marilyn J.Petersen June 1; 2001 Penny Eskenazi 951 Lynnwood Avenue NE Renton,WA 98056 Re: Historic Preservation Dear Ms. Eskenazi: Thank you for your letter regarding preservation and restoration of Renton's older buildings. Copies will be distributed to Mayor Tanner and members of the Renton City Council. Although the Council has taken no action on the request to preserve Lande • Feed, the topic of historic preservation is currently pending in the Council's Planning and Development Committee. Your name will be added to the parties.of record list for - notification when this matter is scheduled for discussion by the Committee. • If I can provide additional information or assistance,please feel free to contact me. • Sincerely, • Maril tersen . • City Clerk/Cable Manager cc: Mayor Jesse Tanner Members,Renton City Council Jay Covington, CAO Sue Carlson,Administrator ' • • 19012Oo1 . • .1055 .South Grady Way - Renton,'Washington 98055--+(425)430-6510 /.FAX (425) 430-6516 ':\T-' ,,, ` . CITY OF RENTON MAY 2 9 2001 RECED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE May 25, 2001 Renton City Council Renton City Hall 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Lande Feed Dear Council Members: I am deeply concerned regarding the impending destruction of the historic Lande Feed building. Julie Koler, Historic Preservation Officer for King County confirms that the Lande Feed building meets all criteria for historic preservation and that it's demolition would be a tremendous loss. I am certainly not a lone in finding the destruction of an irreplaceable Renton landmark during our Centennial Celebration both ridiculous and unacceptable. This situation calls for the assistance of the City to work out a solution to preserve this historic structure. While gathering petition signatures to demonstrate public interest in preserving Lande Feed, I found an overwhelming support for saving the structure, both as an historic site and a beneficial community business. Must we have endless franchise duplicates lining our.streets? Surely there is room for a viable and somewhat unique community business that offers personal service and is more than a "marketing package" offering identical services and decor in multiple locations! The majority of citizens I spoke with voiced concerns about the disappearance of historic sites and the loss of much of the character of our community. They expressed a desire to preserve Lande Feed and what it represents. They also commented on a need for better balance between the number of property owners and renters, that "new" doesn't necessarily mean better and that the architecture in new developments should reflect a quality and style that will age well and blend with the character of the community. However, it is unreasonable to expect citizens to become involved in the process when they are unaware of imminent changes. The City should place public notices in the Renton Reporter to effectively notify the community of pending / I'10 • Ste- a . do.r C ' development. Presently,,we often become aware, after all opportunity for input has passed. In regard to the broader problem, the City should enter into an Interlocal Agreement with the County to utilize their resources in identification, registration and preservation of local historic sites. We have policy statements in the City of • Renton Land Use Element that direct identification, preservation and incorporation of historic resources into city development. Ordinances that support these goals are required to encourage property owners and developers to work out solutions that preserve and incorporate historic sites into our community's development. Clearly, the City needs to take a proactive role in preservation of historically significant sites in our community by drafting the ordinances to get this done! I was encouraged to note that the Council seemed receptive to the input that they received from the community at the May 7th meeting. I do understand that the City cannot dictate to property owners and developers, but I am also aware that the City can have a profound influence. I would very much appreciate the Council taking action to support the preservation of Lande Feed as well as assisting our community in developing a solution that addresses the whole issue of historic preservation. • Thank you, �2GsLt1� Penny Eskenazi • 951 Lynnwood Avenue NE . Renton, Washington 98056 (425) 228-1691 Marilyn Petersen -MRe: Lande Feed �. Page 1 From: Marilyn Petersen To: Eskenazi Subject: Re: Lande Feed Dear Ms. Eskenazi: Thank you for your e-mail regarding preservation of Lande Feed Company,which will be forwarded to Mayor Tanner and members of the Renton City Council. Although an appeal of the site plan request has been filed by an interested party, the City Attorney has determined that the appeal is not timely either to the environmental determination or the historical preservation element of the Comprehensive Plan. The topic of historic preservation is currently pending in the Council's Planning and Development Committee. Your name will be added to the parties of record list for this topic and you will be notified of all future meetings. Sincerely, Marilyn Petersen City Clerk/Cable Manager >>>"Eskenazi" <Eskenazi@email.msn.com> 05/03/01 01:38PM >>> Dear Council Members— ! understand from Historic Preservation Officer Julie Koler, that Lande Feed meets the criteria to be designated as an historic site and is certainly worthy of preservation. As a resident extremely interested in the redevelopment of our city center and the Highlands community, I certainly don't want to see Lande Feed and it's services (retail and community)disappear. Lande feed reflects our history, provides a needed service and has it's own unique charm. My question is,why hasn't this building been earmarked for restoration and incorporated into the downtown redevelopment? Are we going to end up a Bellevue clone,with overwhelming development and no character? While I applaud the city's aggressive approach to planned development focused on making Renton a good place to do business,work and live, I have deep concerns about losing the irreplaceable things that are a part of our history and character. I urge you to-step in and save Lande Feed. I know that there are many others besides myself in our community who would be happy to work with the city to bring this about and develop a plan for addressing similar situations. Thank you. Penny Eskenazi 951 Lynnwood Avenue NE Renton, Washington 98056 425 228-1691 eskenazi@msn.com Marilyn Petersen- Re: Lande Feed Store age From: Marilyn Petersen To: Jim & Barbara Sather Subject: Re: Lande Feed Store Dear Mr. and Mrs. Sather: The site approval application for the property occupied by Lande Feed has been approved by the hearing examiner, and an appeal of the decision has been appealed to the City Council. Your names will be added to the parties of record list, and you will be notified when the Planning and Development Committee schedules this matter on its agenda. Sincerely, Marilyn Petersen City Clerk/Cable Manager >>> "Jim & Barbara Sather" <satherjb@gte.net> 05/02/01 03:42PM >>> Dear Ms. Peterson, We are concerned about the Lande Feed store being torn down. On the East coast, they are so proud of their historical buildings that they restore them and place signs on them that states the date they were built. Why don't we? Why not use the building for a skating rink, a community building for meetings or to rent out for wedding receptions or even for dancing for the young people? Surely there is a better answer than destroying our history and replacing it with yet another modern apartment/condo. Please pass our thoughts on to the Mayor and the Council members. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Jim and Barbara Sather 3112 N.E. 10th Street Renton,WA 98056 Marilyn Petersen -,Lande Feed Comment _,_ Page From: Tami Dauenhauer To: Carlson, Susan; Covington, Jay; Medzegian, Julia; Petersen, Marilyn; Pullar, Margaret; Tanner, Jesse; Todd, Derek; Wheeler, Lee; Zimmerman, Gregg Date: 5/1/01 12:33PM Subject: Lande Feed Comment The Mayor's Office received a call from Mamie Thirion, 932 Lynnwood Avenue, Renton, WA 98056. She said she is a Renton old-timer, and she doesn't want to see Lande Feed torn down. She thinks it should be turned into a roller rink where the kids could skate and also have barn dances. Marilyn Petersen- Lande Feed Comment ; _ , _.. g . - Pa e 1 From: Margaret Pullar To: Covington, Jay; Medzegian, Julia; Petersen, Marilyn; Tanner, Jesse; Todd, Derek Date: 4/27/01 8:02AM Subject: Lande Feed Comment The Mayor's Office received a telephone call yesterday(Thursday, April 26)from Julie Hansford, 2107 NE 7th St, 98056. Ms. Hansford loves the Lande Feed building/business and would like to see the City do anything it can to save and preserve it. She is a good citizen, a regular voter, and grew up in Renton. Her parents are also long time residents and have always shopped at Lande Feed. She has very fond memories of visiting the store in her childhood and continues to shop there as well. CC: Dauenhauer, Tami .97— 6 11 y Q t ���5-P �G�d a .ot �•/ (I° 'h a" i / CITY OF RENTON / / 0 g5 rA 4 i/vA/ MAY 0 1 2001 tp4, UV dt f9• /g6 `�� LEREK S CITY C OFFICE fr,f/k 7G-1 A A /r r,ted-6‹ z kr%et i° 0D-74 -4,--/hzdr,- , fr? ortre 7tit,„ is_z/a„ diA;,L, t I fre 10> ObAg (C111114174. '1/1 `-`2-QT 1-'/;4"L " if;„ /0 6 .. TX2. . Was„ 2)(4,1z- efi— Dra1.u� ilL,%>t- 4411-cj 01'6'4 .-e) ejAr4E.t'... • 0'42 Pv--tv • To- Yo-u- 4-11.044 -4,t_ dr- */14-.41- 4,04A4- • ,o/b4 1,eL, 744 - ,4A—/'));14. -144/rA-1-k- ,L4 or.,h,74- __A,„„ ate. 4,7 , -- / 'Le A44_4) (v • . 4 • '. i ��jLE i, ' Mr Norman&Esther Peterson i �9`' �- 98056-1913 Renton,WA (NI j D _ i 71 " CIT1f©F REliT®N / . I O.-67- a t a cly bill(47 MAY 0 1 001A h �J f D RECEIVD . . I �j��� j �d /� s� Y CLERK'S OFFICE . __. WY r ! 1 1 I 1 . Se2r) Is4r-__.: :. llthili,Iill, ,il,lfil,li,Ellt„lllislitultithlitl,intllll CITY OF RENTON APR 2 5 2001 April 20, 2001 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Mayor Jesse Tanner City of Renton RE: Lande Feed Store Recently I was made aware of the intent of the city to demolish one of our historic landmarks to make way for more apartments in accordance with the city expansion project. It saddens and disturbs me to witness this chipping away of our heritage in the name of progress. It has been my experience and opinion that progress is not always progress! Exactly how many more new apartment does down town Renton require, especially in the light of Boeing's recent announcement of their intent to leave our fair city. I grew up in Renton and have lived in the area for my entire life. My family raised baby chicks and rabbits and later we had a mini farm with a variety of animals. It was a more wholesome era. Thus, our local feed store of yesteryear holds a bit of nostalgia for me and I for one do not want to see it demolished. I am also persuaded that there are countless others like me, who_would like to.see Lande Feed preserved as a historical and educational landmark, allowing it's continuation of service to our community. Thank you for your consideration. It is my hope that the city will develop a way to blend our past with our future. Sincerely, Sharon R. Thompson /4 a /5/ fit. Ss cc: Renton City Council 74)-71 9 id 5-7 Renton Historical Society RECEIVED April 20, 2001 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES APR 2 5 2001 CITY OF RENTON Mayor Jesse Tanner APR 2 2001 RECEIVED MAYORS O ICE City of Renton �+ APR 2 6 2001 RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN RE: Lande Feed Store Recently I was made aware of the intent of the city to demolish one of our historic landmarks to make way for more apartments in accordance with the city expansion It saddens and disturbs me to witness this chipping away of our heritage in the name of progress. It has been my experience and opinion that progress is not always progress! Exactly.how many more new apartment does down town Renton require, especially in the light of Boeing's recent announcement of their intent to leave our fair city. I grew up in Renton and have lived in the area for my entire life. My family raised baby chicks and rabbits and later we had a mini farm with.a variety of animals. It was a more wholesome era. Thus, our local feed store of yesteryear holds a bit of nostalgia for me and I for one do not want to see it demolished. I am also persuaded that there are countless others like me, who would like to see Lande Feed preserved as a.historical and educational landmark, allowing it's continuation of service to our community. Thank you for your consideration. It is my hope that the city will develop a way to blend our past with our future. -- Sincerely, Sharon R. Thompson cc: Renton City Council Renton Historical Society CITY OF RENTON April 18, 2001 APR 2 5 200i RECD CITY CL RK'S OFFICE City of Renton ILO/7 Ozz'- /)1&iR S C�ce �There's a lot of exciting new changes taking place in downtown Renton these days. New apartments and condominiums strategically located for easy access to the freeways and at the same time just a short walk away from our lovely trail along the Cedar River. Walking is a possibility as well, to our library, churches, restaurants and shops in old Renton. And there's a nice big Safeway as well. The city planners have done their jobs with exceeding intuition. They should each be commended. But one bit of news that has been rumored is very sad indeed. It would be a tragic thing for the old Lande Feed Store to be demolished. It should be preserved as a historical monument! Back to the old days, when farmers with their horse drawn buggies would pull in to buy a few bales of hay and chicken feed, or maybebarter for fresh eggs. The history of the old feed store goes way back to approximately the same year as Seattle's Pike Place Market began (1907). Still today you can walk into the old feed store on Burnett Avenue, step onto the old worn plank floor and smell the aroma of hay and chicken feed. You can pet a rabbit hear a rooster crow and of course my favorite thing since early childhood, watch the baby chicks. You can take your grandchild too for a glimpse of the real world. Wouldn't it be exciting if our city planners would help preserve this historic building? It could be an added enhancement for our community, tying us to our colorful past. Sincerely, /kg '. Doris Mech Senior Farmer, Pike Place Market Former Renton High Teacher cc: Renton C{ Tci ty Coucil (5) ° °' �Xety Renton Reporter iii/Zte/a. pU > 2 z� South County Journal Seattle PI �� � DEVELOPMENT SERV' RED CITY OF RENTON C E1VED RECEIVED APR 27 2001 APR 2 6 20�' April 18, 2001 _CITY OF APR 2 5 2001 RECEIVED PUBLIC WORKS NADMN IN City of Renton MAYO1SOFFfCE Mayor, Jesse Tanner There's a lot of exciting new changes taking place in downtown Renton these days. New apartments and condominiums strategically located for easy access to the freeways and at the same time just a short walk away from our lovely trail along the Cedar River. Walking is a possibility as well, to our library, churches, restaurants and shops in old Renton. And there's a nice big Safeway as well. The city planners have done their jobs with exceeding intuition. They should each be commended. But one bit of news that has been rumored is very sad indeed. It would be a tragic thing for the old Lande Feed Store to be demolished. It should be preserved as a historical monument! Back to the old days, when farmers with their horse drawn buggies would pull in to buy a few bales of hay and chicken feed, or maybe barter for fresh eggs. The history of the old feed store goes way back to approximately the same year as Seattle's Pike Place Market began (1907). Still today you can walk into the old feed store on Burnett Avenue, step onto the old worn plank floor and smell the aroma of hay and chicken feed. You can pet a rabbit, hear a rooster crow and of course my favorite thing since early childhood, watch the baby chicks. You can take your grandchild too for a glimpse of the real world. Wouldn't it be exciting if our city planners would help preserve this historic building? It could be an added enhancement for our community, tying us to our colorful past. Sincerely, Doris Mech Senior Farmer, Pike Place Market Former Renton High Teacher cc: Renton City Council ca,) 6ox ) _ Renton Historical Society ,� Renton Reporter ACtt.P&` /Gl./ �, South County Journel Seattle PI Y�o3g �a C. Leiw 5u.e. C. 6r-e99 z. Marilyn Petersen -Re: LANDE FEED STO, Page 1 From: Marilyn Petersen To: MFLISSM@aol.com Subject: Re: LANDE FEED STORE Dear Mr. Fliss: Thank you for your comments regarding the preservation of Lande Feed Store. If you would please provide your address (also for Maridel Fliss),your names will be added to the parties of record list on this matter. Copies of your letter will be transmitted to Mayor Tanner and members of the Renton City Council. If I can provide additional information, please contact me. Sincerely, Marilyn Petersen City Clerk >>> <MFLISSM@aol.com>04/17/01 11:15PM >>> PLEASE SAVE LANDE FEED STORE, DO NOT TEAR IT DOWN...IT IS PART OF OUR HISTORY. FRANK FLISS $95-7 //e/7-4, P-• Wy1 Marilyn Petersen - Lande Feed Citizen Cor nt � __, _ _ . P.age. From: Tami Dauenhauer To: Carlson, Susan; Covington, Jay; Petersen, Marilyn; Pullar, Margaret; Tanner, Jesse; Todd, Derek; Wheeler, Lee; Zimmerman, Gregg Date: 4/12/01 11:06AM Subject: Lande Feed Citizen Comment Evelyn Walker, 1476 Hillcrest Lane NE, Renton, WA 98056, phone 425-227-4140, called to say she doesn't want Lande Feed torn down and replaced with apartments or condos. She believes the rat problem could be solved and the building restored. She said that no one can afford those condos anyway, and that those who can,won't be using the nearby transit center, but instead will have their cars parked all over the place. CITY OT'RENTON City Clerk Jesse Tanner,Mayor Marilyn J.Petersen • April 12, 2001 • Richard W. Anarde 717 SW 3rd Place Renton, WA 98055 Re: Preservation of Lande Feed Building Dear Mr. Anarde: This will acknowledge receipt of your letter to Mayor Tanner, members of the Renton City Council, and the Hearing Examiner regarding preservation of Lande Feed.- Copies have been forwarded to the aforementioned officials as requested. If I can provide additional information,please feel free to contact me. _ Sincerely,. • • ). • Marilyn`. ' ersen City Clerk/ able Manager cc: Mayor Jesse Tanner Members,.Renton City Council • Hearing Examiner • • • • • • • 1055 South Grady Way ='Renton, Washington 98055 - (425) 430-6510/FAX (425) 430-6516 = • . . CITY OF RENTON APR 1 1 2001 ear (/iss/A7rs,) ` i 'i-S �1�, .. . . jp 7�Z ./12 c4'i 6 ecer7FgEciRrAe. (lease see 240. /I7l- �.a4 ea cLr _. _ - a e,• /12 It-V/auer/. .memd er 67`t� e . . . .. C.fy Coal)C/ /la-yo K �a/i/l er ���iPs. ..ani ei,f&ein /5 o- .th e !T earth q Exa/N%fey .. . . . . - recetre el .-.co,y of yny .. - arm !Yt/ ?/by / O/e 6.-o/1C'Ct -ys (" /dae) .//#ek a-s Sao`2 cis - 7` e ,e'/ ?/ dec is/&/i fl0ir` fie /g/e . 6 e i,, m a /l _ ... 74A e .''4&hele -el Co, er ?LT 7 dh t feu 74or' fear ar /1 e /11 - - . f B w h e77' n -S, in ie4 7`0,7, _. .e..1i,'CO/''7, -� ur e - .-/o Gc 7.o --z'h fie,- . - _. - /h ?Lerloca/ a pec/veh7t /171 /C es ec746/l . . 1r/4 cea,Z� . 'thtiC'Gl f r -ePva for► . /4 Q17 ®h ane /04 _of._afi c/ t es�o -a7L cn 6,7 CITY OF RENTON - ) �A Lon ate., e ea/ .Cat APR 1 1 2001 ��^ ���e �� e �l� • ryfy tP�tso�i� RECEIVED I r /y A'el a seS71 a n t Uy 4/ 0/7 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE 3 . Al is terica .. , /9q f"elee`ra / serr/? e . fo . 6o* _.4 The dvi/ h9 pro6al. ola7Les . baC . ._ .'drei17`s �ri�et ycuY14 1/tee/lily 7`O e /Seas (07 od y� d `h en? . 71-0. Co/71/9,4���y serr/Ce exalt a1- 7`h ceh/aky recta// .-cr ,itza/iofis.(ill Tura 1_ ahI s fare arc!//`/eciure, I'a e t'P,-eI) 7t(S- iv,/7 Aie ,rts e ifee'oils ' o%ies/- .. fo .. 41""/d cl arac fie`' Qh I direct c us y.- c eta y . /Aesses, . . youth -•ih 6econ,%t YaluaI// a r feats`s..--sGi et ria 6/e c S'fit!' C.e 710 r4 e .Capt/w a is CPi ..c�i`ra/� 4 �Ora�`iP<ov 114 p. Zs- 7-4 is ,�s .a s/na// 6ustl,eSS i4'41 c/jr %m 'cc/. °eflaey% a II� s erfi/C e t�se/�' is .tap/* aecom jiy ._ Or/,eyr/`a?lei�-e119u lr to .roilsl�r ev� . / - - a -eee Or-f h,stoy . -- emirs ©m � �� 6e C or o �•-s- Ito �f /f2 ee./ 71>)/La. _ -Gomyhu m// Se/et io e ---/i ff-.tesource < ce, e` a/7 .-TA .. rov?cfas.1e.// 7. "Keee s.erlp/ce for those Ssr . eoul ye wAa. eve . /T7a 7/7 6/1/h �n d C'A1� _. !' © a y - r e �s its . . . . _...1�'� P - �ak -. f el -eh �� ---.o- �'� ah � '�yY�`��! �n ��u/s �`�`h�f r � i _ . . _ .a/� - a� .ot1�1`d17 �'�Z� �Um,1PX . . Yes.f p e /e. -41/ ?'A e c a/7,/ex 7as 7 /o5-/1-7 74 ?ri A 6/fq . tr'au.l4,/6 e c%sr - fv stay- es 74-o a s,`a /) _ 71" e'�74/1 g o e y 9 • 4 -- -e��y�r�� .. do -x .Aare fX e ivork$ _ ..Fiia/ p es/ tA ,e.. Za,iJ.e Feed ie-ersus {/YAal` is /62{74- o 6i11, . ---.---- C04, s7Lot e f eeds r/17L-e a ...A er/late 1//4 .0.1� .fro r . 6e1 l `raaa ask ._ 6r a 7`-o cagsaef- 7S e .7a/lo ch,7, - f�i��tE o e for - 14/Aa?" a 6out as a ovoI #ri/l 7 fs �' your /n �r�� e��or . - - y e.s-21eir ' i' 7`A/s eat . cete i74e1 .. tot?7`e't,(1, / '7`0 7`4 a?'" X e y ec f 1a lly, rh/e loca/ - aji"eefnelit kr/T4A -- - ;49 - c one IL - tear ,iis �oric a/ .. 4Xah cL 6t-z - . .. -. __.�?1-• rra !o`j (i)7 .. -Ae, ?lorr) • �'/� S� j/V' 3p1 `°l ._ .af _al -- �aa�eer ._SfYuc at—es_ _ ,ehta//, '22 . our lies//2 ess-. . js /c7`, /'2f11 efr11970,-e 1 j* /7 74 s7'a,� 1f`�d2- yOu Aave._.-a.. .c. ?//e'e f _ Safi e Qssi��.X ew ealis oi'G/e..s-e s 6/7. s7d*J4i ..lasif-ess. strwcf- er/o%eer 661.c/ ec . . ,4ct ycars'e&e'5 fi�is�� ff 'iv in2 fi kevente �ro6ruc:'y s1``'Grc1Clter . Marilyn Petersen -Re:_Lande_Feed Store, , Page 1 From: Marilyn Petersen To: MFLISSM@aol.com Subject: Re: Lande Feed Store Dear Ms. Fliss, Thank you for your e-mail regarding preservation of Lande Feed in Renton. Copies will be forwarded to Mayor Tanner and members of the Renton City Council for their information. If I can provide additional information, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Marilyn Petersen City Clerk >>> <MFLISSM@aol.com> 04/12/01 01:44PM >>> • To whom it may concern, I am a huge fan of the Lande Feed Store in Renton. We love this place. We do all of our Animal shopping there. We've bought chickens, rabbits, and even our dog from Craig Lande over the years, knowing that we were getting quality animals from a reputable man. We buy all of our animal needs there and always enjoy entering the world of the old Lande Feed Store. It's like stepping back in time to go into the old building. We love hearing all the stories about the place and the history of Craig and his family. Besides loving Craig and the animals that pass through I would think the actual building would have historical significance in the community. We have heard recently that there is a possibility that they may tear the Lande Feed Store down. What can we do to stop this from happening?? That building must be more than 100 years old, can't the city help us preserve our past by saving this building? Please don't tear down Lande Feed Store. sincerely, Maridel Fliss //737 S. //f4t#6 �-, Marilyn Petersen- Re: lande feed store rv_,__ __._ ,.__..._,.... ,_.. ..___....... ............ _:._. ... age From: Marilyn Petersen To: Markyw1110@aol.com Subject: Re: lande feed store Dear Mr. Whitman, Thank you for your e-mail regarding Lande Feed Company. Copies will be distributed to the Mayor and Councilmembers for their information. If I can provide additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Marilyn Petersen City Clerk >>> <Markyw1110@aol.com> 04/12/01 01:42PM >>> Dear Mayor and City Council, I have heard someone wants to tear down Lande Feed Store. I am writing to urge you not to let this happen. That building has historical significance to our community. I hate seeing what Renton is becoming. Hardly anything old left. No character left to Renton. Please see that they preserve this building. I am proud of our little community past and hopefully present. Please save the Lande feed Store. thank you, Mark Whitman Z -f CITY F RENTON City Clerk `' Marilyn J.Petersen Jesse Tanner,Mayor April 11, 2001 • Norman Peterson 3402 Park Avenue N. Renton, WA 98056-1913 Re: Lande Feed Building Dear Mr. Peterson: This will acknowledge receipt of your letter supporting preservation of the Lande Feed store as an historical landmark. Copies of the letter have been forwarded to Mayor Tanner and members of the Renton City Council for their information. , If I can provide additional information,please feel free'to contact me. - - Sincerely,- - .0 ,,.., . . ,,,„ Marilyn . 0.rsen City Clerk/ able Manager cc: Mayor Jesse Tanner - _ Members, Renton City Council - _. - s n .r . N AS ;; 901 200 1 . .1055 South Grady Way Renton,Washington 98055 -. (425)430-6510 /FAX(425)'430-651'6:,'.. '` - . .�,w' f-P4tet U/#1..,/, -I- 011 p r ()�PsS-2P Gt 4/I--el- & /74)4 f 4 C ,' L 0 v;lc j/ CITY OF RENTON I Dgs 6roct ely lA/4 APR 1 0 2001 1?.-Peoh, W x" • oess CITY RCEIVCLERICS OFFICE /n � ' r d J (O✓ -vri d L �� ,4 prvOt 14/(11 /9'4")'1" 740- (E8riv /P-#04,2i:/ /te, .P19 v/(;71 / al"C;P-7.- ,;/2- 41, ' �" ,1 v`64 mil. 1�(�'O� -E _/" ViAdtrtA. r ‘1/ Af4V /t :e)(>4 Gt-er// ALvA4-1'.4 %-14-1 /1-4), Av/-- i ),(44- 40-4- 44-14.-e, 47 4 8A,-Y 71-v-r-`2- - aca- tf. r-6,41 &ye- / , 7-4u- 1)J, r-14 - ( ,0,- /-0,L-v/ id16/ akI(PVV/Z/ ,447 _tcrAt/ 4, ,,burk Al/"94/1' C.11 /1'fr oWt.71/14/A74 frA27t 4e- I, 7:4;1".3, 804izoiediviAld. ,144/1L“,#4 eJ-1 71/1-e ,A-e- //- ttrLe /44?1-- Ak#1 -w-1144-11 ,e/v-1/1/7Y-/ ir,-4)-6dil/11.-1-a 74v- hvv-e- ./,‘,4- oat k-tvae_ 2f w1. . - . • e 7, /71e?,I " 1)41-644-- '1;keLl tot /0-14-k, tviz , A//L tt,74/4,t _r/ 7ti)/7/ 1 ,Zon—pt "11 - 4 zre-n-s-t,_ 141/, Marilyn Petersen - Re: Historic Preservation uin the CityClty.of Renton Pa9 e 1 From: Marilyn Petersen To: James V. Zimmerman Subject: Re: Historic Preservation within the City of Renton Dear Theresa, Thank you for your letter regarding preservation of Lande Feed. Copies will be forwarded to Mayor Tanner and Councilmembers for their information. You may already be aware that the Planning and Development Committee met to discuss the topic of historical preservation on April 5th; however, this matter has not been reported out of committee. I will make sure that your name is added to the parties of record list on this subject. If I can provide additional information, please let me know. Sincerely, Marilyn Petersen City Clerk >>>"James V.Zimmerman" <jzimmerman2@gwest.net>04/06/01 06:24PM >>> Dear Mayor Tanner and Members of the Renton City Council, I am writing in response to a mailing that I received from the Renton Historical Society regarding both the topic of historical preservation within the City of Renton and " Lande Feed " in particular. It has been my practice to consistently endorse historic preservation as a worthwhile endeavor.As such I am a"lifetime" member of the Renton Historical Society. It is my belief that history is important in our lives. Artifacts and sites are the concrete measure of that history.They help us maintain our bearings in the world;from them we can gauge our growth, our health and they allow us to view--over time--what contributions we have made as a society. On that basis I write to urge you to adopt the establishment of an Interlocal Agreement with King County in the area of historic preservation. I address the importance of the Lande Feed Store site in as much as it turns our attention to this most important topic of historical preservation. I do trust that the King County Landmarks and Preservation Office and the Renton Historical Society,when appropriately armed with sound legislation, will use professionally recognized standards in determining what items and sites are able to be preserved and of continuing benefit to the community. At this time it would seem prudent to put in place an Historical Preservation Interlocal Agreement with King County, in order that we need not, on every occasion in which a historic site is brought to our attention, behave in a reactive and emergency manner. Please adopt an agreement with King County that would allow not only serious consideration of preservation for our Renton sites, but would in fact,where appropriate allow actual preservation to occur. Sincerely, Theresa A.Zimmerman 813 North First Street diC Renton, WA 98055 (r (425)226-0445 Marilyn Petersen-Linde Feed Comments Page 1 • From: Margaret Pullar To: Carlson, Susan; Covington, Jay; Petersen, Marilyn; Tanner, Jesse; Todd, Derek Date: 4/6/01 3:14PM Subject: Lande Feed Comments The Mayor's Office received a telephone call this afternoon (4/6)from Victoria Olson, 51 Burnett Ave S #116, commenting that she has lived in her house for 20 years and has always considered the Lande Feed Store a terrible eyesore. She is definitely in favor of getting rid of the building. Telephone: 425-226-2549. CC: Dauenhauer, Tami — ' - ---- -- -- --'---- ���-- -- - —' - - ' � � 1 Marilyn11. -�)V�pngn--_-___-----_-------------� `--�----'--'-----�-----� ' ~�~ _ ' From: TamiOauanhauor To: Carlson, Susan; Covington, Jay; Petersen, Marilyn; PuUar, KXargaret; Tanner, Jesse; Todd, Derek; Wheeler, Lee; Zimmerman, Gregg Date: 4/4/01 4:57PW1 Subject: Londa Feed Comment and Question Clarissa Colman Berry (425-228-7747)called the Mayor's Office nn April 4thbo say she would like bmsee Lande Feed preserved, and asked "Doesn't Renton have enough condos already?" Marilyn Petersen -Lande Feed Co. Citizen " nment Page 1 1 From: Tami Dauenhauer To: Carlson, Susan; Covington, Jay; Medzegian, Julia; Tanner, Jesse; Todd, Derek Date: 4/2/01 3:30PM Subject: Lande Feed Co..Citizen Comment The Mayor's Office received a telephone call from Arlene Zanga, 702 South 16th, Renton 98055 on 4/2/01 regarding Lande Feed Co. She declined to give her telephone number. Ms.Zanga stated she is a long-time Renton resident and a former Police Department volunteer. According to Ms. Zanga, Lande Feed should remain, but the owners should be made to restore the building to its original condition, making it safe and making it look better by painting, etc. She said she wouldn't want to see it taken out, as she believes it is the only true feed store in Renton, but that it is an eyesore and is dangerous in its current condition. Ms. Zanga went on to say that she hates the new apartments that are going up in downtown Renton. She described them as "hideous." She says the heart of the downtown has been taken out, and that it should be a hub of enterprise like it used to be. She is of the opinion that nearly everyone of her generation feels the same. CC: Pullar, Margaret , Marilyn_Petersen -_Lande Feed. r Page 1 From: Margaret Pullar To: Carlson, Susan; Covington, Jay; Medzegian, Julia; Tanner, Jesse; Todd, Derek Date: 3/26/01 8:40AM Subject: Lande Feed • The Mayor's Office received a phone call on Friday, March 23rd,from Mrs. Holman who lives in the senior housing next to Lande Feed. She said there's a note on the bulletin board urging residents to call the Mayor's Office to let them know how they feel about Lande Feed. She said she is against leaving the feed store because there are always obstacles (boxes and trucks) in the area that are an unsightly eyesore. Her phone number is 425-226-7120. • CC: Dauenhauer,Tami Marilyn Petersen - Lande Feed Page 1 , From: Tami Dauenhauer To: Carlson, Susan; Covington, Jay; Pullar, Margaret; Tanner, Jesse; Todd, Derek; Wheeler, Lee; Zimmerman, Gregg Date: 3/20/01 10:46AM Subject: Lande Feed A voice mail was left for the Mayor's Office on March 19th by Charlotte Pinaham, phone number 425-277-8387. She did not leave her address. She called to say that"we weren't told they were going to tear down Lande Feed." She is against it, believing that if apartments are built there, they will be too small,with the"bathrooms stacked on top of the kitchen on top of the bedroom." (That quote may be slightly off in detail, but that's the gist of it.) Marilyn.Petersen _-_Lande Feed Store - Page 1 From: Margaret Pullar To: Carlson, Susan; Covington,Jay; Tanner, Jesse; Todd, Derek; Wheeler, Lee; Zimmerman, Gregg Date: 3/14/01 11:21AM Subject: Lande Feed Store The Mayor's Office received a phone call today(3/14/01 @ 9:10 a.m.)from Lucell Mathers who lives in the Cedar River Terrace, phone 425-271-8385. She wanted to let the Mayor know that she supports the idea of getting rid of Lande Feed Store and building condos. She said that this store is an eyesore, that people sleep in this area, and that there may be drug activity going on as well. CC: Dauenhauer, Tami • Original Message From: Koler, Julie [mailto:Julie.Koler@METROKC.GOV] Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 9:44 AM To: 'briere@wolfenet.com' Subject: Landmark Preservation Services Terri: King County developed a regional historic preservation program in 1995. To date there are 14 participating cities., The program is implemented through interlocal agreements between the individual cities and King County. This cooperative approach to preserving the region's history and character has a number of benefits: • preservation of significant aspects of local history • protection and enhancement of key elements of community character • access to incentives for property owners • potential additional access to other county funding sources for preservation • compliance with growth management requirements for historic preservation • cost efficient delivery of professional services • tourism development network Through the program King County provides services to identify, designate, and protect significant historic buildings, sites, structures and districts as local landmarks. Owners of landmark buildings are eligible for a variety of benefits. These include property tax reductions, eligibility for low interest loans, grants, and technical assistance with restoration and design. To participate, cities must adopt the County landmark ordinance by reference, appoint a city representative to the King County Landmarks and Heritage Commission(thereafter referred to as the City of Renton Landmarks Commission for work in the specific city), and provide for design review of any proposed changes proposed to designated properties. Design review can be done by a City board or committee or by the County, at the City's option. Additional services may include preparing nominations,updating historic resource survey information, assistance with historic preservation planning, or other preservation-related work, again at the City's option. Although the County is required to receive full reimbursement for these services, grants from the State Department of Trade, Community and Economic Development's Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation are available to defray some of the cost to cities. Attached for your information are copies of a generic interlocal agreement, the local historic preservation ordinance,the County Landmarks Code, and other information on interlocal agreements and preservation services. I just converted several of these documents to electronic format so that I could expedite sending them to you. Please contact me if I can provide any additional information or answer any questions. (I'm hearing lots of concern from citizens regarding the Lande Feed Building!) <<Generic Ref Ord r3.doc>> <<Generic Interlocal 01 .doc>> <<Ord 10474.doc>> <<T26Incentives.doc>> Julie M.Koler Historic Preservation Officer Landmarks&Heritage Program King County Office of Cultural Resources 506 2nd Avenue,Rm 200 Seattle,WA 98104 Tel: (206)296-8689; FAX(206)296-8629 e-mail: julie.koler@metrokc.gov www.metrokc.gov/exec/culture Terri: Participating cities include: Auburn; Skykomish; Shoreline; Kirkland; Carnation; Snoqualmie; North Bend; Black Diamond; Newcastle; Kenmore; Woodinville and Issaquah. We're just about to sign an agreement with Redmond. Program costs are based on an annual workplan that is developed by City staff in conjunction with our staff, and which is approved by the City Council. Projects are typically identified up front (we do respond to urgent situations but only at Council request) and dollars are set aside in the budget planning process. Costs are based on our annual fee schedule figured on an hourly basis. We supplement city dollars with federal pass through dollars from the State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation. The fee schedule is attached at the end of the generic interlocal agreement I sent earlier. It is up to each City how proactive it wants to be in pursuing preservation. For instance, the City of Kirkland has pumped tens of thousands of dollars into its program in the last few years,while the City of Shoreline has done nothing. The City of Redmond is also setting aside substantial amounts to initiate preservation planning activities. If there is an "average" annual cost it is probably around $8,000 -$10,000. A drop in the bucket for the public good that is realized! I've attached our contact list for the participating cities. Let me know if I can provide any additional information. Julie Interlocal Agreement for Landmark Services AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN KING COUNTY AND THE CITY OF RELATING TO LANDMARK DESIGNATION AND PROTECTION SERVICES THIS IS AN AGREEMENT between King County, a home rule charter county and a political subdivision of the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as the "County," and the City of a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as the "City". WHEREAS, the City is incorporated; and WHEREAS, local governmental authority and jurisdiction with respect to the designation and protection of landmarks within the city limits resides with the City; and WHEREAS, the City desires to protect and preserve the historic buildings, structures, districts, sites, objects, and archaeological sites within the City for the benefit of present and future generations;and WHEREAS, the City does not have the organization and personnel to do so; and WHEREAS, the County is able to provide landmark designation and protection services for the City; and • WHEREAS, it is in the public interest that the jurisdictions cooperate to provide efficient and cost effective landmark designation and protection; and WHEREAS, pursuant to R.C.W. 39.34, the Interlocal Cooperation Act, the parties are each authorized to enter into an agreement for cooperative action; NOW THEREFORE, the County and the City hereby agree: 1. Services. The County shall provide landmark designation and protection services using the criteria and procedures adopted in King County Ordinance 10474,K.C.C. 20.62 within the City limits. 2. City's Responsibilities. In support of the County in the designation and protection of landmarks the City shall: A. Adopt an ordinance establishing regulations and procedures for the designation of historic buildings,structures, objects, districts,sites, objects, and archaeological sites as landmarks and for the protection of landmarks. Regulations and procedures shall be substantially the same as the regulations Interlocal Agreement/Landmark Services -Page 1 and procedures set forth in King County Ordinance 10474, KCC 20.62. The ordinance shall provide that the King County Landmarks and Heritage Commission shall have the authority to designate and protect landmarks within the City limits in accordance with the City ordinance. The ordinance shall include: 1. Provision for the appointment of a special member to the King County Landmarks and Heritage Commission as contemplated by K.C.C. 20.62.030. 2. A provision that appeals from decisions of the King County Landmarks and Heritage Commission pertaining to real property within the city limits shall be taken to the city council. 3. Provisions for penalties for violation of the certificate of appropriateness procedures. 4. A provision that the official responsible for the issuance of building and related permits shall promptly refer applications for permits which affect historic buildings, structures, objects, sites, districts, or archaeological sites to the King County Historic Preservation Officer (HPO) for review and comment. The responsible official shall seek and take into consideration the comments of the HPO regarding • mitigation of any adverse effects affecting historic buildings, structures, objects, sites or districts. B. Appoint a Special Member to the King County Landmarks and Heritage Commission in accordance with the ordinance adopted by the City. Pursuant to K.C.C. 20.62 such Special Member shall be a voting member of the King County Landmarks and Heritage Commission on all matters relating to or affecting landmarks within the City. C. Except as to Section 5,the services provided by the County pursuant to this agreement do not include legal services. 3. County Responsibilities. A. Process all nominations for designation as a landmark or community landmark made on properties within the City. B. Conduct design review,planning, training, and public information activities necessary to support landmarking activities. Design review, planning, training, and public information tasks shall be defined by mutual agreement Interlocal Agreement/Landmark Services -Page 2 of both parties. If the City does not appoint its own Design Review Board to review proposals to make changes to landmarks and to issue Certificates of Appropriateness for such changes in accordance with the procedures and criteria set forth in the local landmark ordinance adopted under 2. A. above., the King County Landmarks and Heritage Commission shall serve as the local Design Review Board. C. A copy of the Commission's designation report or decision rejecting a nomination shall be delivered to the City in addition to the parties specified in K.C.C. 20.62 within five (5)working days after it is issued. D. A copy of the designation report shall be filed with the County Recorder by the HPO together with a legal description of the designated property and the notification that the provisions of the City ordinance apply. E. Process applications for Certificates of Appropriateness to demolish, move, or make alterations in any significant feature of a landmark within the City limits as provided for by compensation. F. The King County Landmarks and Heritage Commission shall act as the "Local Review Board" for the purposes related to Chapter 221,1986 Laws of Washington, (R.C.W. 84.26 and WAC 254.20) for the special valuation of historic properties within the City limits. G. The HPO shall review and comment on applications for permits,which affect historic buildings,structures, objects, sites, districts, and archaeological sites. Comments shall be forwarded to the city official responsible for the issuance of building and related permits. 4. Compensation. A. Costs. The City shall reimburse the County fully for all costs incurred in providing services under this contract, including overhead and indirect administrative costs. Costs charged to the City may be reduced by special ' appropriations, grants, or other supplemental funds,by mutual agreement of both parties. The rate of reimbursement for labor costs to the County costs shall be revised annually. Addendum A contains 2001 labor costs. Maximum total cost to the City shall be revised annually. Addendum B contains the 2001 maximum cost to the City for reimbursable services. B. Billing. The cost of services shall be billed quarterly. The quarterly bill shall reflect actual costs plus the annual administrative overhead rate. Payments are due within 30 days of invoicing by the County. Interlocal Agreement/Landmark Services -Page 3 4 i 5. Indemnification. A. The County shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, agents and employees or any of them from any and all claims, actions,suits, liability, loss, costs, expenses, and damages of any nature whatsoever,by reason or arising out of any negligent act or omission of the County,its officers, agents, and employees, or any of them, in providing services pursuant to this agreement. In the event that any suit based upon such a claim, action, loss, or damage is brought against the City, the County shall defend the same at its sole cost and expense; provided, that the City retains the right to participate in said suit if any principle of governmental or public law is involved; and if final judgment be rendered against the City and its officers, agents, employees, or any of them, or jointly against the City and the County and their respective officers, agents and employees, or any of them, the County shall satisfy the same. B. In executing this agreement,the County does not assume liability or responsibility for or in any way release the City from any liability or responsibility which arises in whole or in part from the existence or effect of City ordinances,rules or regulations, polices or procedures. If any cause, claim, suit, actions or administrative proceeding is commenced in the enforceability and/or validity or any City ordinance, rule or regulation is at issue, the City shall defend the same at its sole expense and if judgment is entered or damages are awarded against the City, the County, or both, the City shall satisfy the same,including all chargeable costs and attorneys' fees. C. The City shall indemnify and hold harmless the County and its officers, agents, and employees, or any of them from any and all claims, actions, suits, liability, loss, costs, expenses and damages of any nature whatsoever,by reason of or arising out of any negligent act or omission of the City,its officers, agents, and employees, or any of them. In the event that any suit based upon such a claim, action,loss or damage is brought against the County, the City shall defend the same at its sole cost and expense; provided that the County retains the right to participate in said suit if any principle of governmental or public laws is involved; and if final judgment be rendered against the County, and its officers, agents, and employees, or any of them, the City shall satisfy the same. D. The City and the County acknowledge and agree that if such claims,actions, suits,liability,loss,costs, expenses and damages are caused by or result from the concurrent negligence of the City, its agents, employees, and/or officers and the County, its agents, employees, and/or officers,this Article shall be Interlocal Agreement/Landmark Services -Page 4 valid and enforceable only to the extent of the negligence of each party, its agents, employees and/or officers. 6. Duration. This agreement is effective beginning upon execution, and shall continue automatically from year to year until it is terminated by forty-five days written notice from either party to the other. 7. Administration. This agreement shall be administered for the County by the Manager of the Cultural Resources Division, or the manager's designee, and for the City by the City Manager or the manager's designee. 8. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended at any time by mutual agreement of the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement this day of , 2001. CITY OF By: Title: KING COUNTY By: King County Executive Approved as to form: By: King County Prosecutor Interlocal Agreement/Landmark Services -Page 5 • Interlocal Contract for Historic Preservation Services Addendum A: King County Labor Costs The following hourly rates for County-provided historic preservation services apply for 2001. The hourly figure incorporates wages,benefits, and overhead as set in the indirect cost rate plan for the Office of Cultural Resources. The figure is adjusted to account for vacation, sick leave, and holidays and thus reflects actual working hours. Historic Preservation Officer: $65.66 per hour Preservation Planner: - $60.25 per hour Landmarks Coordinator: $51.19 per hour Executive Secretary: $45.24 per hour • Interlocal Agreement/Landmark Services -Page 6 Addendum B: City of Expenditure Maximum During the calendar year 2001, total reimbursable costs billable to the City for historic preservation services provided by the County under this interlocal agreement shall not exceed$ Interlocal Agreement/Landmark Services -Page 7 - • ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE relating to the protection and preservation of landmarks in (name of CITY); establishing procedures for designation and preservation of landmarks; and providing for enforcement and prescribing penalties for violation. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF (name of CITY): SECTION 1. Findings and Declaration of Purpose. The City council finds that: A. The protection, enhancement, perpetuation, and use of buildings, sites, districts, structures and objects of historical, cultural, architectural, engineering, geographic, ethnic and archaeological significance located in (name of CITY) is necessary in the interest of the prosperity, civic pride and general welfare of the people of(name of CITY). B. Such cultural and historic resources are a significant part of the heritage, education and economic base of (name of CITY), and the economic, cultural and aesthetic well-being of the (name of CITY) cannot be maintained or enhanced by disregarding its heritage and by allowing the unnecessary destruction or defacement of such resources. C. Present preservation programs and activities are inadequate for insuring present and future generations of (name of CITY) residents and visitors a genuine opportunity to appreciate and enjoy our heritage. D. The purposes of this chapter are to: 1. Designate, preserve, protect, enhance, and perpetuate those sites, buildings, districts, structures and objects which reflect significant elements of the (name of CITY) county's, state's and nation's cultural, aesthetic, social, economic, political, architectural, ethnic, archaeological, engineering,historic and other heritage; 2. Foster civic:pride in the beauty and accomplishments of the past; 3. Stabilize and improve the economic values and vitality of landmarks. 4. Protect and enhance the (name of CITY) tourist industry by promoting heritage-related tourism; 5. Promote the continued use, exhibition and interpretation of significant sites, districts, buildings, structures, and objects for the education, inspiration and • welfare of the people,of(name of CITY); 6. Promote and con um a incentives for ownership and utilization of landmarks. 7. Assist, encourage and provide incentives to public and private owners for preservation, restoration, rehabilitation and use of landmark buildings, sites, districts, structures and objects. 8. Work cooperatively with other jurisdictions to identify, evaluate, and protect historic resources in furtherance of the purposes of this chapter. SECTION 2. Landmarks and Heritage commission created-Membership and organization. A. The King County Landmarks and Heritage Commission established pursuant to King County Code, Chapter 20.62 is hereby designated and empowered to act as the Landmarks Commission for the (name of CITY) pursuant to,the provisions of this ordinance. B. The Special Member of the King County Landmarks and Heritage Commission provided for in Section 20.60.030 of the King County Code shall be . appointed by the mayor subject to confirmation of the council. Such special member shall have a demonstrated interest and competence in historic preservation. Such appointment shall be made for a three year term. Such special member shall serve until Model Local Landmark Ordinance (Reference)/Rev 3 - 1 his or her successor is duly appointed and confirmed. In the event of a vacancy, an appointment shall be made to fill the vacancy in the same manner and with the same qualifications as if at the beginning of the term; and the person appointed to fill the vacancy shall hold the position for the remainder of the unexpired term. Such special member may be reappointed, but may not serve more than two consecutive three year terms. Such special member shall be deemed to have served one full term if such special member resigns at any time after appointment or if such special member serves more than two years of an unexpired term. The special members of the commission shall serve without compensation except for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with commission meetings or program. The (name of CITY) shall reimburse such expenses incurred by such special member. C. The commission shall not conduct any public hearings required under this ordinance with respect to properties located within the city of(name of CITY) until its rules and regulations, including procedures consistent with this ordinance, have been filed with the city clerk. SECTION 3. The following sections of King County Code Chapter 20.62 are incorporated by reference herein and made a part of this ordinance: A. K.C.C. 20.62.020-Definitions except as follows: 1. Paragraph F. is changed to read " 'Council' is the (name of CITY) city council. 2. Paragraph I. is changed to read " 'Director' is the (person or officer who approves building permits for the city). B. K.C.C. 20.62.040 - Designation Criteria, except all references to "King . County" are changed to read(name of CITY). C. K.C.C. 20.62.050 -Nomination Procedure. D. K.C.C. 20.62.070 - Designation Procedure, except all references to "King County" are changed to read(name of CITY). E. K.C.C. 20.62.080 - Certificate of Appropriateness Procedure, except the last sentence of paragraph A thereof. F. K.C.C. 20.62.100-Evaluation of Economic Impact. G. K.C.C. 20.62.110 -Appeal Procedure. H. K.C.C. 20.62.130 - Penalty for Violation of Section 20.62.080 (Paragraph E. above). I. K.C.C. 20.62.140- Special Valuation for Historic Properties. J. K.C.C. 20.62.150 - Historic Resources - review process, except all sections but the final sentence of paragraph B 4 and the entirety of paragraph C thereof. SECTION 4. Severability. If any provision of this ordinance or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the ordinance.or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected. • Model Local Landmark Ordinance (Reference)/Rev 3 - 2 INTRODUCED AND READ for the first time this day of , 19 . PASSED this day of , 19 . (name of CITY) COUNCIL (name of CITY), WASHINGTON Chair ATTEST: Clerk of the Council APPROVED this day of , 19_. Mayor Model Local Landmark Ordinance (Reference)/Rev 3 - 3 J • • f KING COUNTY CODE 20.62.080; ORDINANCE NO. 10474 CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS PROCEDURE A. At any time after a designation report and notice has been filed with the director and for a period of six months after notice of a preliminary determination of significance has been mailed to the owner and filed with the director, a certificate of appropriateness must be obtained from the commission before any alterations may be made to the significant features of the landmark identified in the preliminary determination report or thereafter in the designation report. The designation report shall supersede the preliminary determination report. This requirement shall apply whether or not the proposed alteration also requires a building or other permit. The requirements of this section shall not apply to any historic resource located within incorporated cities or towns in King County, except as provided by applicable interlocal agreement. B. Ordinary repairs and maintenance which do not alter the appearance of a significant icant feature and do not utilize substitute materials do not require a certificate of appropriateness. Repairs to or replacement of utility systems do not require a certificate of appropriateness provided that such work does not alter an exterior significant feature. C. There shall be three types of certificates of appropriateness, as follows: 1. Type I,for restorations and major repairs which utilize in-kind materials. 2. Type II, for alterations in appearance, replacement of historic materials and new construction. 3. Type III, for demolition, moving and excavation of archaeological sites. In addition, the commission shall establish and adopt an appeals process concerning Type I decisions made by the historic preservation officer with respect to the applications for certificates of appropriateness. The historic preservation officer may approve Type I certificates of appropriateness administratively without public hearing, subject to procedures adopted by the commission. Alternatively the historic preservation officer may refer applications for Type I certificates of appropriateness to the commission for decision. The commission shall adopt an appeals procedure concerning Type I decisions made by the historic preservation officer. Type II and III certificates of appropriateness shall be decided by the commission and the following general procedures shall apply to such commission actions: 1. Application for a certificate of appropriateness shall be made by filing an application for such certificate with the historic preservation officer on forms provided by the commission. 783, (King County 12-94) • 20.62.080 -20.62.100 PLANNING 2. If an application is made to the director for a permit for any action which affects a landmark, the director shall promptly refer such application to the historic preservation officer, and such application shall be deemed an application for a certificate of appropriateness if accompanied by the additional information required to apply for such certificate. The director may continue to process such ' permit application, but shall not issue any such permit until the time has expired • for filing with the director the notice of denial of a certificate of appropriateness or a certificate of appropriateness has been issued pursuant to this chapter. 3. After the commission has commenced proceedings for the consideration of any application for a certificate of appropriateness by giving notice of a hearing • pursuant to subsection 3 of this section, no other application for the same or a similar alteration may be made until such proceedings and all administrative appeals therefrom pursuant to this chapter have been concluded. 4. Within 45 calendar days after the filing of an application for a certificate of appropriateness with the commission or the referral of an application to the commission by the director except those decided administratively by the historic preservation officer pursuant to subsection 2 of this section, the commission shall hold a public hearing thereon. The historic preservation officer shall mail notice of the hearing to the owner, the applicant, if the applicant is not the owner, and parties of record at the designation proceedings, not less than ten calendar days before the date of the hearing. No hearing shall be required if the commission, the owner and the applicant, if the applicant is not the owner, agree in writing a stipulated certificate approving the requested alterations thereof. T agreement shall be ratified by the commission in a public meeting and reflected in the commission meeting minutes. If the commission grants a certificate of • appropriateness, such certificate shall be issued forthwith and the historic preservation officer shall promptly file a copy of such certificate with the director. 5. If the commission denies the application for a certificate of appropriateness, in • whole or in part, it shall so notify the owner, the person submitting the application and interested persons of record setting forth the reasons why approval of the application is not warranted. D. The commission shall adopt such other supplementary procedures consistent with K.C.C. 2.98 as it determines are required to carry out the intent of this section. (Ord. 11620 § 15,1994: Ord: 10474§ 7,1992: Ord.4828 § 8, 1980). (King County 12-94) 784 ,.- .. INCENTIVE PROGRAMS FOR LANDMARK OWNERS Technical Paper No.26 0 King County Landmarks and Heritage Program,King County Office of Cultural Resources 506 Second Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle,WA 98104-2307(206)296-7409, 1-800-325-6165 TTY A generous program of incentives balances the controls imposed by the King County Landmark designation program (i.e. design review before making changes to a landmark property). The incentive programs currently available are described below. These programs have changed over time and will continue to change as tax and zoning laws evolve or new sources of grant funds become available. Individuals owning King County landmark properties or considering designation are encouraged to contact the Landmarks and Heritage Program at(206) 296-7409 for updated information on particular incentive programs. Special Valuation: A Local Tax Incentive Program for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings Special Valuation subtracts eligible costs associated with the rehabilitation of historic properties for up to ten years. The primary benefit of the program is that during the ten-year special valuation period,property taxes do not reflect the substantial improvements made to the historic property. Prior to the passage of this law, owners rehabilitating historic buildings were subject to increased property taxes once the improvements were made. To be eligible, the property must have undergone an approved rehabilitation within two years prior to applying for special valuation, and the rehabilitation must be equal in cost to at least 25% of the assessed value of the improvement (excluding land value). Current Use Taxation for Open Space King County offers an incentive program to preserve open space on private property. Landmark property owners may be eligible for some tax relief if their land contains one or more open space resources such as recreation areas,watersheds, scenic view corridors or historic landmark/archaeological sites. • The incentive program functions by establishing a"current use taxation"property tax assessment for the open space that is lower than the "highest and best use" assessment level that usually applies on most land in the County. The reduction in taxable value ranges from 50%to 90% for the portion of the property in"current use." Designated landmarks qualify for a 50%reduction in taxable value for the land portion of their assessment.. Properties determined eligible for landmark designation may also qualify if they include another type of open space resource. For property to be approved as open space under this program, either the potential for additional development or use must be present, or the owner might provide public access or agree to other restrictions in return for tax reduction. Public access is encouraged on open space preserved , • Incentive Programs Page 2 of 3 under this program. However, access is not required,particularly if visitation could damage or endanger the resource (as with an archaeological site). Landmark Grant Programs ' Cultural Facilities Program (Hotel/Motel Tax Fund) A cultural organization(either arts or heritage)which owns or uses a King County Landmark is eligible to apply to the Cultural Facilities Program for the purchase,restoration or rehabilitation of the structure. Competitive awards are made annually by the Landmarks and Heritage Commission. The Commission determines heritage priorities each year and considers the applications within the context of these priorities and general program guidelines. Landmark Stabilization and Restoration Grant. From time to time, special grant monies are made available for the restoration, stabilization, or rehabilitation of historic properties in King County. In 1993, the King County Council made a special appropriation of$100,000 to stabilize a limited number of endangered county landmarks. In 1995, the Council made $500,000 available as part of an Arts and Heritage Initiative. The Landmarks and Heritage Commission continually works to develop new sources of restoration funding and publicizes new programs as they become available. Landmark Restoration Loan Funds Low-interest loans for restoration projects are available through programs administered jointly between the Landmarks and Heritage Program and Washington Mutual Bank, the Valley Community Bank in Duvall and the Issaquah Bank in Issaquah. The Landmarks and Heritage Commission reviews proposed loan-funded projects for compliance with restoration and rehabilitation standards,while the banks focus on the financial eligibility of the borrower. Loans are available for the restoration or rehabilitation of privately owned residential properties through • Washington Mutual Bank. Loans for restoration and rehabilitation of commercial properties are available through Valley Community Bank and Issaquah Bank. By providing restoration loans at a reduced interest rate,the Landmarks and Heritage Commission assists landmark owners with projects that ensure a longer life for these significant historic resources. Owners of landmark properties in unincorporated King County or landmarks in cities that have an interlocal agreement for preservation services with King County are eligible for the program. Technical Assistance Owners of designated King County landmarks are eligible to receive a range of technical assistance services from the Landmarks and Heritage Program. Primary among these are discussions with the members of the Design Review Committee who review and approve all changes to designated features of significance of landmark properties. Included on this • committee are architects and preservation specialists who can share their technical and practical. information. In addition,the office maintains information files on both preservation and local 1 I Incentive Programs Page 3 of 3 history, and publishes the monthly newsletter, Community History,which keeps readers informed of issues and changes in the historic preservation field on a statewide level. Investment Tax Credits The Tax Reform Act-of 1986 permits owners of buildings listed in the National Register of Historic Places to take a 20%income tax credit on the cost of rehabilitating such buildings for industrial, commercial, or rental residential purposes. Many King County Landmarks are eligible for listing on the National Register. An owner investing in rehabilitation of a registered historic property will have credit against federal taxes. The Preservation Assistance Division of the National Park Service monitors this program,which is administered by the State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation at(360) 753-4011. • Revised 7/2000 i l42'^'^ ��t.,.rep.24{agyC,: ^t;Jar 7 d : i<,a, x, „h• am Y s=• '4.,W'2`'. 1' iT _ y .. Y fir"`"` T-1. x . t`- 9, "Mess*�<y_l� ii.j 3'i%°� Y. ,� as .• •`.„,,,,'9z.r,��{ ...,.� 3 h'a..s., S g t,y:n,!...�n,^,'y.ry, s-:x- rFe ' • G,� -ri t1f ? - , 4 s,�,-4Y ",r ,• T„ r� ;1 o,, :qY • " *" " z s T::‘,.:..:..'"..T.-. ,,,.A0 Ut1tt : ' r. a,q^�,, 'rm "` w e..t t.<7v..A ; . ?^ I •c 4 f1- -'61°'"4rA y "v„-4s�.""r�. 'iX.'„e• °a�¢ .oat �a. � X:+ •a3'h .f,..`"„`r-+..;.� ..t' t r -.4. t" ' ^ . -'.. - 43"' Sit, ▪ `ems y §">v '"''�tr •fix'' `yam. �"f ` �c'"x a+t<'�' 1 E ST C,s ' 3". " P.r '''',5 '3 r+"".,. '� ,?r"> �Y, .g t .- s>s, ::_ a:r t�, y r t ' :4 ,' x„ S Zia,. '- . w. d i.T ,r e t ti rr...,;5<,r\„".1,R6 s.'Kt at "-k4,-k. r'v+- Y 1 "AAs4,x Y ' °, 'yYa a F,, _. -'.,,, S7 .•,„.." . >•''x ,, ..„ r....a 'C3 }n"' _ ..,,, • 9 •i. $°Y _vs„,,„,„....,....--:- , 3•{+� .'rJ'o;tx,�. � !.3 T b �Sa R� yx: "F t ,,t�s.�. " 4 k r ''x.rP if ,>.s'S- SS <3�` d $ r iT <2e 3 ° It +:-> t# { "- 4. �,t•<'c^� ,as t :�Sk E `ttz t ¢¢¢S • „z-4,4w f, '13 ,1 -•a i r?It3 A ",4� ' V'l•,,,, ,x'' ,„,„-t fi, .,ram r fa, ~`� *1:..: j •'a•ri4.=,,:.:tW • • ���t •$ !s"`S'rf'� j q 3Y"<.` ;A3' 'ma y.v % E'3 a' s.� ;• �7ti 3 Ij • f3 3 ''a sty rfi il� , `4 5 �s � w ?', .'"`>•` ;.` �'q� • t "i `f`r'-,xq'u tf� .< •`�, 3'`a -s't Fas� l;n c ; j ,.�;'i kI ''`'.'•1 -is, ..,,,- r• _>_�'; a sa .°tad '?.,.., ,z :454. ,,• z i sc A ,C'• "t' ,P'nt .: ,,,Iw 'tY x"� a > f �4N z t • s i °a. t h`. � ,. S 'y`tY,? 't' M "'. 't a^a,=,;,.$,C-s ?1"s, L ` " <:" ,��d.'..'"meu ,• , �� i i '?` .3z�'mx'^3 f'x`'� _ �N to r, �<.,zr'•. Y` ,1.I 1 ,''' l''"k rT_'.E#' ",s'We . '" i<r' r ;:;,-, F • M +. .�_ dF p',,x ^ ,--,s�<. �! s'Y ..4,4, «v , »_' ...-s;� '.3. `::\'i .:x. N..„. ,eT x- ,. _ .xs, (3 J�� u'•}" ;- ' T ,_ r3 r s. ..'?„-�...i w ...`v':';c`M`? • �. ' f �.: "::"tf��aA . 4 '$t• A'3 rs 3''. x... ;.'. •x - 4 -e'3'ti•r ,4ti•• ,a 'fir' ,.,. `+ '` r- ': d :, .?y,arm x: :`f ICT,�.,,,x +.� `� •.s`y f' •`""°r +:'�., v�•"r, ` p, � �,y-'rc -y :^,'i.'a • r� .:. t �K t .::;' v ., - ':.:IA z_;''. x,i ,'.'°F�'"„�` . ikai's,- '••4�s:%3� `: '�.. ''�y7. �" �,•; ° Y t J ?t y, 3y ^t-.: ,..... Msz;Y:..,�.?,,.,- �+.�q. R • ;.,t �"s3, ,C.�v,., +•'' ��k <. "•rvD` �.K' _�.% .:+.. �;:,. ;;;;� �',: .x� .;r `�a`G ns.��"'`� .:s^S'�'' '. � *f,w�a,.�>� A t.., `''t't o:.a•;;:N Rt r.F, ,L..q r- >..6`:.:•..;::.x;L'» .;,�'.... �=ee .4 r7ht,F-t:, .w -,".r.^ri••;k` "c°:s^ �,: 4"ti +,�' _.str %: .s,`Y.;'=.i,.iy t..,tz.::bn `C"' i:... :,?y �.2,x r'>'^X' wa«M�.}:,;s•"S.rS� �'�,•�,.� ..s . ��:�;ri µ`xi ' u. 'g,'..`:•":r��.,•<'"*. ' .:.y;:*..W:L;e -<, ::} ; .tr •ice '9--''t,.."at�:`i. r. ,. `y5 + < 4:7-,,�; ,`',,;" . :T'�'""Z',T' ( ` '. a. 7• ^`';y r '?='s ? .,.? ?';a 3 'c SFr.` �h °'• } Sw'..., -• t #`r�r�+ `S r"` 3,t5v t£�'�`'�` t#C y„aka` z=. .. ,. <;a<<'y�4k �F Lion looked early in the century - ��g x• 4.i *sage.3'':c.�.,,� :•, z, z eS x y,,X 4 w it _ •;,,"4 ti# �q ", .,i "ti � ;. , � '� 2 .s,G, � � 14'�'^W*i tT rry s gY<'�t•. i ness in 1929. Then, in 1960,Ed bought the entire �,,'iiF e s' _ '`. a y, g '< f S``4„ 4'. t z.y,- 2�,5�k",',,+5't +'" r+'�^ a •"a y '�"`" t +i.� •their operation.He relocated the station from downtown 9 `r " y `_;`` `Y to the � '" '" K �`� { � � to 301 S. Grady Way seven years ago. ;`s "y`�" •'s'� x . ,`.,*'4 4." } :r�= r ivor's -"I still have a few customers who traded with my ' t xk "' ;� £ „�„� ', i • dad," Ed said, adding."good service" apparently �� 1 j�;'y +� brings them back. 04204, ,£ ti -, i �r^' t,3., • ` were "You just have to give the service—that and � �`+�'"���_�'� � ,� �,_i e�' ;��3.� � ,��' ,° s•�=��; , k�� " iored don't overprice .-� f t` :� ., t�:,� 1;-c 3 P yourself," Cooks said. "Most , , *"',,. a r'�;`1 ;r.. .,.�4k�t • t � " � ?, ��„,r, a :e for service stations today are strictly self serve. We : { ,„ , d •u r, µ�Y:r ;`ys.,i 1,l. .� l..o re. ��;f-�•0 . k le for offer self-and full-service.A lot of people who pull � , • ��� rm ofr3 xy 7 js a y i Fr ' fi in here off the freeway are grateful to find a station Say- that does more than pump gas } t z �/.: '• "firs w4 5,�zx .Y '-.q. ,--x K'."rs"v"�vf�'.'w�' .a.w �....,.,,,w„s`-:x,4<a;; .>„ ° 3.,: s' ,.a., k$,zk o:_1 5 „ ;,e&ai ` _ rack; Cooks,54,said he'll probably stay in the business • vare; at least 10 more years.When he finally bows out,So Phil Lande has no regrets he switched from law to family business Bell; will Grady Way Chevron as a family owned stars photo by MARK MORRIS t Co.; undertaking. All of his children are girls, and he atur- said none of them are interested in running a ■ ■ servicestation. Family...run busin. psses f the The family affair likely will continue at Lande sur- Feed,though.Phil Lande's sons,Craig and Damon, • work at the store and have plans to follow in their ■ ■ . R mncl y dad's footsteps,tokte just tor as Phil did. Str® ntmily Phil took the store over from his father, Clar going the ence,in 1965,and changed careers in the process. 'bird Phil had been working for 15 years as a lawyer in lish- Kent,Burien,and several cities in Montana.When By PAT JENKINS Cooks' Grady Way Chevron service Clarence retired in poor health,the family had to Staff Reporter 61a years the offspring of a business begun decide whether to keep the store. 61 ago,and Lande Feed Co.,which nisi- The decision was easy for Phil. Ed Cooks and Phil Lande own busines- has been around for 59 years,are living :Z — z j-1cis ses that have bucked a trend for "little proof that small businesses can hang in guy" commerce to fail. In the processs, there even when the economy doesn't. '• . • • , f o .. 1 V 4 m 1t(�ttott1 • ASH I ID I , a r Y L sr,.., ,, T fi • `+ '° P A `.04,,x E .0,. r w [ yW'Ca.k fy. • ?1 ;S7 _ Z •- .„,,, { g< x ''444-te .,:',---.. hi.:,:qp,ei- .$1,. .-4.,,,,,,,:i, 1 r; ,it il.::-... ..:.- .:',..:.;. it :"i. r *r, ... ,q .{ ,:,,. 0.„ . . „...2, _ _,,,,:::„. .. . , _ ... ._ T '-aS�1+ ` 3•z t �' 1✓ Y w i l 'tt /A y x '+•T zas .y cr4 I a.3 �•as ' c,A#[.,•f,i f..r-.,. t z. ifs. ide ,p e ? �E�� tip rtt i^�� ' $` a6.., �d�� ..-rn,.. ;'� '�^�d'��*... �'F'f�"xi,a'�a sus�,i.•t'3; ,` � . t4 '^�. .� zr •, .anti ,.^ru, c ; r�.,."&'-.s . , s., ,3 ':;¢'Itns �. ..vo -,gn+.r'',b.L wow`�.5`**''-., ..+-.+ate i 'ci.'h This is how Reid& Cook Service Station looked early in the century Familybusiness • . , . (Continued from page Al). ness in 1929. Then, in 1960,Ed bought the entire recessions that drove other concerns to close their operation.He relocated the station from downtown doors.Cooks and Lande said there's no secret to the to 301 S. Grady Way seven years ago. longevity of their businesses, just a survivor's •."I still have a few customers who traded with my instinct and hard work. dad," Ed said, adding 15 pioneers brings them back. "good service"apparently Cooks'Grady Way Chevron and Lande Feed were "You just have to give the service—that and among 15 pioneer Renton businesses honored don't overprice yourself," Cooks said. "Most recently by the Renton Chamber of Commerce for service stations today are strictly self-serve. We having been part of the city's commercial scene for offer self-and full-service.A lot of people who pull 50 years or more.The list includes the law firm of in here off the freeway are grateful to find a station Dobson, Houser, and Dobson; First Federal Say- that does more than pump ings and Loan;J.C.Penney;Longacres Race Track; Cooks,54,said he'll probably stay in the business Mathewson's Automotive; McLendon Hardware; at least 10 more years.When he finally bows out,so Pacific Car and Foundry;Pacific Northwest Bell; will Grady Way Chevron as a family-owned Peoples Bank; Puget Sound Power and Light Co.; undertaking. All of his children are girls, and he Safeway;.Stokes Mortuary;and Washington Natur- said none of them are interested in running a al Gas. • service station, • While some of those names are giants of the The family affair likely will continue at Lande business community, others have fit in and sur- Feed,though.Phil Lande's sons,Craig and Damon, vived via family tradition. work at the store and have plans to follow in their Take Ed Cooks and his service station.An uncle, dad's footsteps,just as Phil did. Walt Cook (he dropped the "s" from the family - Phil took the store over from his father, Clar- name). and a partner, Walt Reid, opened the ence,in 1965,and changed careers in the process. forerunner of Grady Way Chevron in 1923 at Third Phil had been working for 15 years as a lawyer in and Burnett. Along with gasoline, the establish- Kent,Burien,and several cities in Montana.When ment sold appliances and electrical supplies. Clarence retired in poor health,the family had to Bought in 1929 decide whether to keep the store. Ed Cooks' father, Henry, bought into the busi- The decision was easy for Phil. '...k..t .-tel ..t..,14 Lwt,./ ,1_ — z t—s--y RENTON HISTORII' . , SOCIETY to n Lane ee ruislçounter REtTON HISTORICLE 1 I . About 20 feet inside the double live rabbits, roosters and the occasion- a customer, maybe 15,000 ba front door, next to the horse blankets al customer's dog out on the loading year" — and animal feed and• and saddles, where the front counter dock. The t}tne-stool washroomh door catte you'dto needh for everythin of Lande Feed Co. used to _ loading- • dock complete with a "Our motto has always t be, there's a worn-smooth, �w P Alb* half-dozen fresh corn cobs. it's alive, we can feed it!'" I one-inch depression in the f•°�.��a�=�•:��-:. wide floor boards where z .M�-n'' :` "There used to be a sign Many horse owners still find i Grandpa Lande stood be- .:gsF , that those were for emer- nient to stop for hay and some hind the counter for almost '•�; gencies or cowboys," Craig feed on their way home fror a half-century. . -. <= said. • And, of course, there are t h :_ f What used to be the roosters and rabbits and oc Better known as"C.O." .a ,:,�,. .,,„ or "Stubborn Norwegian" F•s" z 3'r` - grange hall upstairs — and, puppies,kittens and guinea pi, to his Swedish friends, according to some hand- The mill building and m; Clarence Oliver Lande had —'r , me-down history, also a to the north hasn't been use hung up his lawyer's shin- Jon Prohibition-era speak-easy, since the Longacres business gle — literally and figura- Hahn dance hall, church, pasta off, but the store's origii tively — and decided in- factory and an Italian fra- counters and bins still are stead to deal with the front ternal association hall — with Bag Balm, liniment,grit, end of the local horses. now is a whole lot of meals and seeds, standar( That was back in 1925,when C.O. mostly empty space used occasionally broken into small brown par Lande phased himself out of the law for feed-store office work. But Craig's and by-the-pound custom r • and the Seattle livery business he "working desk" is a cluttered niche everything from wild bird shared with his father, and into the downstairs, not far behind the old oak grass seed. feed and grain business way out on counter — now moved to the side wall At the front of the store,t the edge of farm country in a new — and the Sunset Grain Co. floor safe. not for sale and definitely it town called Renton. "Business.went down some when Mokey II, the feed-store cat, You'd swear, by looking at it, that Longacres (horse-racing track) in a saddle, surveying custoi the weathered storefront, with its closed,"Craig said."We used to be the keeping an eye on a stray oversize single-strength glass panes principal supplier of hay and feed bouncing off the high cei and the tacked-on warehouse and feed there for years.Hell,when I was just a walls covered with old fa; mill, hasn't been painted since C.O. kid, I used to ride along on our truck Craig eventually catches the took that last dragon ship to Valhalla. and kick off hay bales there.That was and tosses it outside while "But you'd be surprised how many when there wasn't much more than watches with disapproval. people get upset when I try to paint or farms between Renton and Portland." Today, like every other i redo the old place; they get upset Well, Craig's not as old as that week.Craig works the count, because they expect this old place not perspective would have it,but the 1973 a 10-pound bag of scratcl to change," said Craig Lande, third- University of Washington'grad (histo- customer and some cob pul f generation feed and grain merchant. ry and English lit) was selling feed pulp to another horse ow A lot has changed on Burnett and grain and chicken scratch and dashing outside to help loaf Avenue South in downtown Renton horse tack long before he made it out On the loading dock, he since Craig learned the business at of grade school. bulletin board festooned • Grandpa C.O.'s knee. The McLendon "C.O. had a lot of old friends sale" or "will trade" notice: Hardware block on the other side of who'd come in during, the day and larger chalkboards with Burnett — resurrected after a disas- he'd tell me: ''Watch the store, kid!' scrawlings. trous fire 15 years ago — was a And they'd move to the back of the Someone wants to sell second-hand goods business when store there and discuss politics and new engine heads for an Grandpa Lande bought what was then what-have-you, and maybe have a Aerostar; someone else a grange-operated feed business. drink or two and start calling one "lease a gentle, well-broker McLendon's now is a spacious another"dumb Norwegian" and "stu- and someone else "Will hardware heaven — state-of-the-art, pid Swede."' . Unwanted Ducks & Pigeon; cutting-edge, full-service,public wash- Craig's father, Philip, also became either a giveaway or protes rooms and plenty of parking. Just a a lawyer and hung up his shingle in the message: "Free Gilb• stone's throw up the street, Lande across the street. His mother, Patricia, Pot-Belly Pig 180 lbs." An Feed & Grain looks more like a was Dad's legal secretary, but both has a "1-year male turk weathered western movie set, with parents also helped run the feed store Would trade for female." and mill. Craig and his brother Da- Things will get busier "(People have) mon and their late brother, Michael, and new foals, lambs, goat . worked there after school, weekends distanced themselves • and school vacations. Craig gave up plans to follow .) tASIi1tCUN 11 8L; from the earth, and family footsteps into law school and _ 0 t instead took over the feed and grain • FL�11;DLYLYt LiAREtAXEt • that's not good." business. "I guess you could say I'm - the frog in a very small pond,"he said. iri,�� j%j/� — Craig Lande Today, along with Damon and some • . REsTt seasonal help, he's still selling hay — Lunche hone. TP,I17?;± w7--177;,"s "not as much as when Longacres was So.216 St.&Marine View Des Moines(5 loin.from South DOES YOUR KITCHEN NEED A 1.11 Seaftle?'ost•7iitet6'kncer,5aturony,maicn la. I'll)/ tveignnors —_ odern hüst1ebustie les last ;. .w� xx -w �ss� x. i w aaq�i•' e,. � ,<-<'�,<� +�•' i. fi :vhatev �iw�y G��a,t�� e� r � r �p!4rr�"ny� � 3 �xy`� �r�� 5"�r�{�" }`�}{ 'S, <4 ,k d.thil liA1 .14, 4__ Ig h A g fmmr; v; w �;ri .a,' y,„,,t x14 ,�C' een If .v �'� ��, rPr-•> tsaid •. '�U�'O� � bags of t i �• i. n work. ' ._� 4 , --; i ose live - • {, 1 ti: CRSIOnaI gS. { i. . t::.-. �.�•:x. V. % f• f�� �Y� y � }i ,chinery w .w �}•:;: s Y¢G -fit.?>s ,A' : d much ! .,s»: 'z; s F dropped 3 � l _._.<' sJ_. gal oak :. T � .. . .. .r�.-3+w. Y,rd t stocked :::_ , . :;:'.- . 'R„�f�'{ r r fl:` E' , <,,<: z scratch, },• • .. } t; €_;. ;;.,; ,1 hc� -5 t� • .�� 1 mixes l <`;:` v l .�: ? Pc� ' 'r•4,i g n"—.''t'Wit':+'? '>' .4,,, 4—:1, 5 ter bags, :. ` y * . , ,..., nixes of I' a: >' �� ' seed to . : l '° :'- lefinitelj! . tifitil 1 a , , :. }l .1 �m .,, < ? ; A 31 c, r , • 1 charge � sc• �� ' ` �• ' t r sits high 3 � # • s & z:nK x < (, a x<° i ,. ,j ners and F .1 ` - —_ • starling • r w: , : , :: :, ling and • �-� 'I .ay,'' 1, '.. ,.,.:a•:� •m tools. :, v- .`' ' - 1 tired bird .. '' ' r i � �.. Mokey 11 �, " o ' :tr lay of the U T 4 er,selling iir; '. t �- ;:►._.: _;�:.. ;. 1 to one .., 'u . and beet , fi <£ s. : : < ? _`,, r ner, then -s 4 -,qz i iE �;..v. 1atruck. e j % Nj I, �> �a passes a - f • :a lu• ,rif: f.ti .• k ;:;. :.':5...;c 4 with for ;, :, k x ^ram . 3,T: �,,. n' a and two "3 a,. .",` jn 1 r .r. "5-: g4.f �,s^ys 4, ' a f x h s.' • <i } - <3 2 i similar w b s4 i'€ `r < T.' >`a° -Y u:,n.<F.:i<.. s ._,...: , " : , :.- �.. KUR'T SMITH!P•I PIIOTO or trade one of the w wants Ford to arwner ound Craighis feedstore e holds he hearts of downtown Renton. he eeps 1 gelding," Pay For puppies and weeds start growing."But distanced themselves from the earth, ;" There's things sure have changed,"Craig said, and that's not good. Everyone should t indicated leaning back against the old hand- have a garden or an animal, at least a '-rt the Big crank McCaskey System cash register pet. It puts you in touch with other I someone that still works, if and when it's living things besides people." .ey, white, needed. -- "People aren't as involved in ■ Jon Hahn is a staff columnist who writes as spring animals or growing things. They've three times a week in the P-I. s, goslings, .'.�>,. <fir,c.:$ - - $�:.t, �r---:;-: !-. � ., most Y- i' ; i..-- :tit=t Make the r "'' your windows Wit`:' . `Y for less of your '• : k.:,. .• a ;o:r ; :# :K money. = >F ti. 'I* ^:. Silhouette' window inter Mall). s1 ' It 4 i ' shadings, Duette') `- t 0 and the .,- : ; ,-..., ' honeycomb shades -T� 1 :g-., :,,ir.: ' 't ovr,h iciva nPw de-liahtTM • Lande Feed Co •• Gl�gn �e of a bone era at Y •p )' • ,. • By CHARMAINE ADSERO " ` I . ' _ ':.�...^• "``y.�`•, l� s s �y�si° � � «`�`^�Jpa 7a„4 NEWS EDITOR `.."'= t µ3Y ss . ■f� `+ >�' s�h>? w k < ra,d w 4 �.cw -. �fT� � ::F , f you're one of those E ; ' A, tj€ • i N• q `� r �a<{ u:"'s r' ',' • ° s < • ,s=_ s`s ../. Z ii + �.'r° tas5. a,R >r I seeking a newer, , x tx it`y o . a yz4s ko s R 1 f, fr. +,tit t > sleeker image for — M ; ,v 3 :., ;�_.� � g v: 0'Y ;3' r "' r`. ., for 1 - <�°{aa%5's j '- x , S r Cl `LI firo 11 S H 'k ' ne t7 P' �4 Renton, you likely yf i t �. p=<'= � � l >: : f , J c �' { l • Lands .r x won't enjoy visiting ` f ..a a sib?e, x ''<#a s(' u Y E ' CM.t.,i$, =wa'�� Jp•:.' . a :� s s ( f Ij.z s)�'l'.".,4,Jf.'��'• Y'�.Y£`«. �kµ1 hA`S `.1�' Ws, But ifyou like farm r `I1 ,"< ,ij ,.,., ` }_ ",s. .its_."" ,:. wZ t z . I CCd Co. t � r ft t W� f t. £ s _ .�t4„ L..., 1 animals, ancient bar L3 5 •{ ' '` 3 jai ai zi' • �,,s ,, I t ' <.r' 36 n. • h Si�4 a,'�.v,.�1 .�, : �,} p f ��#> .� s I � Lt � n the county ou'll E` 'fll n'.< e n a rx.. hies 1 � k,/1. , r,,. d. > v • S�. �� p:`; �f fit „p,,.3a . ' t .(✓ ram Y Y � .• ��%;`.'. , ff tt ,t t r"1 . : <w:. ', £ } s{l<; < , 3x ' j ,a,r Ir< , ,..:,..:: 3b r Mf ... i '� �..S 3,5{'`< tl SS �.<<.. Y'r�£'�;�1 1... -. love it here. . . .. .._�{..: ::ef::.'< r" ?�3 r 1. .,:d'r.`` e' .,f;,,a•• :'<_#• r�.<".""�.y. ''K+„=x, _ K The feed store, located just t�;Q % �,,.t�� ': �., .. < .,.., .. < :r .,, '`�v>�� I. ;� .• `<w..�ej� Yi- r`--:�-xa� "'`,� """ _��� r'.s G ,<=,.ar. . 4:,:';.; across from McLendon Hard T s.,. t ;..s. ,> ` ?: - f: r' " 4r%b'.: :<.,�."3"-,,.;1`�^`� ...,,'w,.,. 3{z 5 ; e�z r ..e r .F. :k,r _�_ F.`°9. f ;r ty�y ';,s<.a�M»..ii tt Avenue has %<,�t.;�«�a�;^ -..rY' � z= i : J'"'•'°` `.�_. <`�'✓ + ?: r ••<€",'��};• az,t<.:. rr ware on Burnett , ,," 4," -."=:=,:�,Q.�0'"• w-.1 ,R r� =' N'-...;1 x s:).V"."�{�<„'rx;t�t: M.:.»fC<,.,.,. n�yf.. � Y >f'' ��ypJ..`{f:'�p>�'= 'e...t;F'a+x. � a.. ;.W = -^•`+.^+.:,s'-w.;' .K�. Ys been owned. and run by the .: .. > k-Wk?,-,:, ' ,,,::..,J..< 4 ' � « . <'.tsp µ a. : ,:>;:.�.. y _,�.-:�.<>':':ri-r>,>:... ..�Y. 3i <>".e ..w ,� "Pw'a�. '4a"�;vo'.,�f',L'.� ,t!<,..<o",,"= :is „'..ygv,< for thepast 71 :':.:'.< grwx::",..,a. l,t. . Lands, family ..,..> «<..�<J..:i.3z;.<�:�,�; .:#,3-, <..:V, -1....7•,,,...,••pos'A��sa :,.; ':,r�;: x,.x 3 .',i:�x.>,< r�H. • d it .,. ::.:E',Y,"<^,. ,nwY, ...N., a Y�x,....� , ..f R ..`f ..;iKM ,m. " '.SE��'+5�..cars. Cral Lande inherite ...,4, {ky s;s �',..., ..It:<_.r, • .N3:.<. , <, :,rg ,-• f ,;.: «",;; :' .<,hvw...rsR":.aS 9<� .�j ���'tlO �,i,S ('< - i: � 4z= P, h%w"`'t'�.� Sfather who inherited - f�� .' ,'»tr. :.k'. r ,?. ".:m his ,,�, %s`,`;x...,, . �;,kfro w��- ��;;�:t x�p^';k<<< ,,�,�w;,. <,z, .� :� �,}, � ','�;�;r.;::;� �,,, Y6: YT •.it,�. =.'x.• ,/h'">'.�`.' R7 .l ':3'.< ^x:: :T,h++n =<xi `gE,' e'' ,�.: his Lather Clarence ;{' ' �°%� .,, .r?>,. x ,.k-:. ° It from - s'' � ,,h y C��'�>,:�f��x�" ..� r ? : `+, ik , , ,k� �C :>'r,M<... s. <„ r :'..<.,, ''. ,,:;.s::. ;,,..,..•• v<:,r: 'y:7's'.»�«K•:::g..;«.>c:,v».,,::0:::._ "_ " ande who bought the D,'�',-%�.: t „a,8+si:i.`.r,;:'.7 {'•'%r,�c ..�,.•'-''; „urC„ :.. I-' .? r ti`zX•sA?, �i`.'`.°„,.�,,?s• t< e "L< • z°f' C.O. L „< . _: , gt 3. .•OZ's : ,±•.,ax<.. .r. '. :,�;.r_,.47;4$t: i i: '`ram. --:' :„... "^"+i.''.< :.vK:.: . .rG` ;i:,.,,..:4 ,,,,gi:<..".,.< .1,:.v:...4.. ,,;,.,,r,,a,tic..,>.. '�r i>•.:<..;..."..;� ...< ...-,no'�Xa,:, v.�?%.:,,. <,>..:..;.";,.<i}:� �:�'�`�` building in 1925. • x::i< .as .<.:„..„Cn.x <,.m..,f,nE` ,w ,,;?;•£ dfl° ;. V.,, ,5'.>,,,,-:{.4).....:.:<_::;,`S:p?. .•:'sc,,s , '^, ,',,cr' „_.: .:'...:?:��;;�.".... <.-.. _ .;:' N<'.;.,a....:.;...<,,,.:•`^i::... .'„:.:«Y=:...,. �s"!s;�;r�z�•,,St... =v:"'2.i ,4,u it was old. �:'<x...:. :r' r ;-:. � ,�;,:;..::,,�,,: , „.„il tY„Na gts's ii�s <,'.>op,.r%�,?.."_';,�,.!" b , ; Even then, :. �::�`�i,;J.<�..... �.,. :':,..r:, ..: ;.,:'":,:':.::':W^' ..=.„c<.,c,f '",,,,,4 r)° :dit<r 4,-*s rt ft,a ssx 2ta:',:>sr.t:n ;: r�,k; :.i.'.ft, f%i �c,���. '....,k,- .,t.:>oyp'>GR`i .TiY .. <i.�,: '• '._'.,..' L">>-:: =ag^�.,< '�i..'Y^.,.'u<-�': ..a5 '.1'�Q i.: �.EJ a<��':^•; Craig said his grandmother ;;,,_;�,;,:s:,. ��;' . ., .. , •.. ." , v ,. y '�$ �;,;,,.�,':«<�' x... ,... .,... ,':. s,.,=#?^gs£i,<;�° c.S.fe. Ysaa=^cs�..' 3'sf E. }:. r. ;i'a,<3+, . 'Y• .y�., ..<St." �.^,,... >,i.",:'�?F J'..... .,' =ra ..,` ,"<5.::';' .S::x':i� ":..�.:Sysr. .,ya:�`Sb,..,b.i'e:;t.4>..:W.'r,�K.�<��;t N.: ssby ;:€a };✓. i?t..,. §.. ,. N >,5,: .,a. oa'r s.,Y a i'r'.<° mixe ` ' historycrankingout „;r<•«x:,r'<;:3. �",<: ., .. >�z;>%, ;t::, €•��``t,,t.x.:5:;;.'<r'«:<t= <s� .�.r.,< �:y°;n..;�,�;§=•zrr.<„ ,. .. -`r' ...'-it. traced the structures grain <' , ;.'r.�?x.`.{�������:'<.'M'<!S�.:•<,...Y':',u(:.r.'<..��,:':::,:"..,{.,H.::,yr.:::�r,.>:.:.. •�<Y'r:•..i.:.c.....)^a."A=,:.�'?.. 'i<<i'... .. .,; R:ir> round on- .��..:.:,t:.......:......,".:..., back as far as the city's incor- the.ton every day, g Photos byDEN7SIAN potation in 1902. Although site in the mill that still towers • .J• • � � dr< she couldn't Lind any earlier over the ancient wooden store- it,,,,,,,,,,,,,-,, �,�� `�� ��� .x �<'�7. �"���6 st � Ralph.Ka es _lit, L ' ' •.(above) sets out°r•`r6k. � >� r ,` J r7 7y3„4< <S , , ss 4 ,, J.. front. Lon acres was then the f �5 :r e., .x>.�,,<>,� F .r =ram �� , records Craig is pretty sure the g Rat _ oyxf �r f wi „ of r account. <,:;,, F, ,- ;. ,<.,.,va<> tk.,, °�t, =:s eh,: x„ : t animal cages building •predates the turn store's major .:=z=.r, r s «s 4ti„.r ae . ,_:,.<:.:.,rMx::y�kr:<,.,5. ; Today, the mill is cobweb- r u� rt§� ,s -.` x z F, a "y • • the century. t�, st. ,___.: <, �, s while owner And the feed store looks strewn and silent, though still x r, A". ' Craig. n e de functional. When the race' • >>' <+:.`' ' ' = 'i cradles a pair every day of it. Today, Lan fully functio p.%''"""~ {.... Feed Co. looks like something .track died in the early 90s, it r•}'z t r + "" �Ma =: of puppies that John Steinbeck or Jack Ker- nearly took l:ande Feed along Firs' :I� ,t,Y&v will stayat the ouac might have encountered in with it. Craig.had to lay off • Ez S " ' za1tt.,,,•� ., :,.: store until the their cross-county rambles in V`'"' y five of his regular workers. in • w3 3 x,f 1,-: • ; ; right owner the SOs and 60s - an almost order to survive, leaving only m "fft J<�.• ," "down home" .L t �' "' ` t� t `i44t comes alo surrealistically himself and employee Ralph. "�`, ",'° " ` Ka es to •run the ' store... ge,ik Nx > ' „':? s %; ` pp• � t�, �� �>F •n1� - °' .°<<',<<<, after noticing his six-toes structure with a charmingly >k � f ^�(��r� ��Y�a`",f�"j±F„s, dilapidated storefront. "Those were deep,dark days for %a t. �� ; r;::� ;„H>::;,':< paws. Her and his wife dubhc= Avid animal lovers come us," said Craig. "There was , :. .° � ��w. £ # G ,>,r , ,w". him "Mr. Hemingway," afte here to find everything from almost nothing on the shelves aFr:l n <_ • " i` „ the'writer, whose own .cat ha( cob bedding to parrot mix for for a while." '� six toes as well. their pet cockaticls. There are But Ralph agreed to stay ^fib 1,'• • >' _• ',� And the hen that now rule wooden bins filled with with on as long as possible and he # ;c� s k. . . I « Craigs back' yard also starts' cracked corn; rolled oats and and Craig managed to salvage ' f out . „•,,, salvage ;l;A4 . i. x .. _ .;;.,or :,. ' ,, "..< at the feed store. Th !''e , RENTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY ® "„'i ;f:;;,,+ 9p eer.-,7,-A 'Y,:.IF:-:',, :3;,^x ," ,....,,..-X. • e ®f a bygone era at Lande Feed Co . . • �`+�`` ,,,,,,„,,,,: :, _,,.., ,,,:..„.,,,,,..„,„.„ .. s . . : ,. .. . :,•:..:. I text' rx d•f cr ( fi ti,> . .. : . ,. ',.:'''' ;.'". :' ,r il..;:,,,,`.'g.;;,',".r.., .....,,,' ' ZA.f?-B,:*Zat;;„,'..‘' .'",...1t,`,.i7,:i.;}arWk:4 . ,. . el', t 2,1••: ,'-, � , : sut r xr"r , rem { e ,, . w Ta`• rS Al aar r -3•;:‹ " _ ,� g.,f h : �e k ,J'"�^,ai, !„ -,,`>` c-•,r e a h "tt br d .r I { 3` >�,1", ,a` n�' Zv- k .{�s 1: .rr,. `F. _ c0.::.., s;-3-,G,<� ,a :l y $' &S _"'.,l_...,a ../,5.1a y '+f' �!>'< ;:.ate-t "` -_!,,, ^T:r •t ?sf �: <;- ' 'a'A i A`^.<0->-i.•.,,,x :"`, a"".. i ,�` _ gl r ' E'....,g- .•,•I.:I c 1,- :., ., r•^ r s r } . 4^c"' > .,x mrst ,,, , 1�4 �4?-:A� - r ml a + E c-S %�.'a' .r`. ',''Fi ,� ;2•, ti°�..�s :."�<' .sf • �% ci �'^ r i- 4 ,i.i nd , t ',' Y.t 4 'at 1 •Ne a>2t �� slim. <...M . v.f:. ` l '" � Et� n �=t� •.}. •t°.-�=y .�' r `�„ ,,,s-r rk�.. 1 s a .., ,;,r_,• ����t .�a� , , 1'II 1 5fi 'jj •'s 3 n �i,,4`:;,!E w li r IV (' , PM 1`3 .V � ' 'i %L• n"' <t x`t''{ 3 K tom, '^ a y t,'s'` [� 'r.:!`;<.• . ., ,;`• =",f 'M m X t•, { � t _ ' iz e L-r.r k ,, 1,::,. ;,� �,:` _.,ff i F„r y t ,'t 4 yi;sr.°.� •Yc' ism;, L. ,:r, t •� ;; - '�s.. t! .1 f.�� k Pt<��"';�5; 'ter:<v "I,�. h' %� ` : <'€ , ��t §. Y h .,�� st , rd "".-,'e'>',.$ o", sI,vi: �S-l::=„w,.a ', 5 .+.�' < . a-'._.>kii-. 'r.k;ti,..' t,i3',x^a�t a .x.. a-�..k x f ,K ms.< 3 ,�.. ..i`:.. �`.r ,f`.,� 5-� .,; Pr't , laS „ ev,.*t-""_ _ =Z . '` r Z ri FA`f�z'+ r 1+ y- r `4 s:>1 Y a.' '' w 'r;•`- .--:t... r•-4.Y., a x,lf• - ^ifi ..; a.':•vA. ,•sr f r �L`- '.,�r: 71 :I,�' ..;fir':. .,,:..`>, %::" ..,'.�,y^r '<a>S! arm' :;€3::�.s:<.'-"a„ �,s'3.x '' Y.wa � ' 5[ =�:_„A ,f ,. .�I... -,�.r>. '4 s. '771' .A' 1: �„ ,r: ,rzaa< . «y;,tn<; ::Y :i � ,�V.S;;r' ;ed mowL.- �w• e""a-:}:;7i k^;>` µi'• -''e.—"��:n�e",,�- =r� , ,a ,�.c�y-�C,i Yt�; 4.c • �xx,�;.:� Y,ti,�y`:3��.<c�'�:-s a_�xs F...G.: tee .,. ,�,��:pt a �:',�h,..;.L. Y. .i':�,.y^� - ..s • --:r"Fi_<;�,..:�r�: �':r=x:.-�:;,�a.., atIvr r y..G'�S it: is <a= :1 D� s >3>, i War k. '��,x:i�g%ni3�'U'< ..�-� ':l i�.. , }' .cx`w .�..L„i: %.K-,.>.3xr:<"\. s,.'.r-c .::Jt r ...5'. . tea<� 1> .$.. `at .<Y..,ti' 'a`.>^n>'��.. "�;:: �i'C1. ��. "°'�ma , P ��`>. .he _:__=:.� � :=p .,.. g:.,� ,• r_�,, !•� . '.,.�:' �_.y�M.,��, v �:,.s- �.,..'�s�,�,-., _.fit• :��;«;` ;:z�,.. t .. •,,.- . ...r> .,`.,.�.�.,,�: ,.:" i:' ,fir . -:£:;. -.....•,.-.<,:._,. �..€S 3;Fr€-.* „ �,c9-�;'. ? ..] e' l,T; " r nrA.{N '4>'',0. I> '%. >„,. +w+ n:,.tbw „'',n'".i".`, .(tt;' via'-<.�`j'o,',.." .Y .n49^'^,:kr+ � .>3"<iv:i.:�a^.� � ".f:•:;r.G..� .:Yw. ,.e2'.. .<.';i 'r,�' ..'S 3; ':::'...e:�` (.,•+„tg:^'.:,<, w g , '±t4,:.,r',t .,.3-°r..°-,`3..' y:":'r`.'R`.Yr',>r.'Y�:6 jS:'^�,: '.'.�.a�.�,1'S, :,x�`x i'��y<� • ..,.;•5 p .<-,. Gn'�, .,-"``€:''. -'.,,.r,::.• .a;�;.''.k..x.,, „<F., -�r"�'<.s. .r i"s^�';> ;t''r:''''- >z�., .,n,,,<,=:;.,n,,:. �: rx'..•,.yp' .. 'P«�'s„ •.t>. rx z.:,.. , .'-',.,a .P Cy -.4- -,4„ -:,ei'=aY..: ,,:.3:s�',f-,`..<:,<:^.s,., .t.»<qVp,. n 36•3 ':.I t•,'"s:r:!'f `w:a :,c out grain m►xes b ^x",,,z,=,' r.� ,, k.,j,,,.;b;c="" _ :5 ;a., > crankingY a ":.5�.P�,» ;s�� §;,<:, w,3:S' vagti t `, _ r* • 5,c.,ry, " .,x ..,�{•.e• _•�: '- ���2i ti ' az , .;3�?cx=>::cd>c�'S, ..,�-..4;<'q?< ,.. ,�.,..�..y��„;°:.. , ,�<n..,. or- .the ton every day, ground on- . <<,�•a ,. :.. . .. . . .. = • gh site in the mill that still towers w _ Photos by DENTS LAW ier over the ancient wooden store- ``,.;:' 1., - T € , Ralph Kappes the front. Longacres was then the `:: = """ " ` '''' (above) sets out �'r..t-�..::.M ,;. animal cages of store's major account. >3 -�'=`*<r ''--S ''" cages �y y _;.k r1 .:��"x<'" '^+. ��' „'ti.<."fi'`�.,e;<ey'i`"•,i;«�... h;.tg(�9�•r. ;i i`xyrz%'f'`g,I Today,the mill is cobweb- � Y^- "" -,w:. A -•'_ while owner • Mks strewn and silent, though still t '.az;; , . N.g � •:�' � �'r��.i::<f�-•�;�.�•-�'r.. Crai .Lande ide fully functional. When the race - t t. L.=;,�.. ':.'--=; pry • cradles a pair ng track died in the early 90s, it _ . 'W 17;:`- er nearly took Lande Feed along - 0= , ;;<5,. ::„:; of puppies that . ' r f", f will stay at the I in with it. Craig•had to lay off , x �a �, 'w``r„✓',,,, ,;s- :,.,-,' 1 r x.-2.7,. . in five of his regular workers in § " ,,� `` '"' x =-t store until the ost order to survive, leaving only t >,-•.,,,Y:=•,Nb; right owner himself and employee Ralph s '" % .+ °�<� r ,"-,1“- 4 ; comes along. to run' the • store: ,' �.°. ;> , "t' °f' -• � ..f. gIY Kappesp.? � t after noticinghis six-toed 'Those were deep,dark days for + �' s °�� aws. He and his wife dubbed 'me us," said Craig. "There was ' : :.` .," ,„`"; P om ',co:. .' ' ^<-"�: ?;,.: him "Mr. Hemingway, after almost"nothing on the shelves " ' ,f>}; „ - r , �, , �� r �<.,,,,�.,�P;"- the writer, whose own cat had for for a while. om 34 - .� are But Ralph agreed to stay . '? x six toes as well. ith on as long as possible and he ys ,7 , "` • \ - . And the hen that now rules and and Craig to salvage ::; • ";, Ciaig's back yard also started managed ,�, <.�`M. >x ��Y<�`a',,",::� � - out at the feed store. The eed what remained. Many die=hard 1 t, 4 �; 4:..<�£'. ' •.. 'fix ire 's{1,F- "', {•:6 ;`fi. smallest in the flock, she was Iola customers continued to come � z , .�a r ;�41;:`:s:;;;"" ,,.>•,, • s `ts tit ,, -.- nearlypecked to death by the ,tir- back, and Craig. expanded his ,, Y 4yez.,:nh� • ' ' and „,,s, �. - ` ;,. , .I ', •- s y t > � other chicks for being a runt. inventory to include more do- ,�, y� � �r '}wh t.:".,,r;., mestic pet food. Dog and cat .,A.?-, e Y ,. ay 4 �, ,�� ,<. Craig, who admired her spirit .< for pecking back at them, Can rod now account for '� A state z' ? p j ; °3 , ti . ;;, c- - nursed her to health with an aig. nearly half of his business. ,, s e •,:' : T ',,,.:,3-- 3 ` '" " `"'''"` ' 't e e dro rand named her Moa f as He also buys and sells y pee any animals, although he admits Koa Iki, a Hawaiian term for it's questionable whether or not ut while he sighed at the .They rece he best of meaning "small, fierce real he makes a profit at it, as he costs, his soft-heartedness pre- care until Craig or Ralph can chicken." ,r . _ .._..,:f� ,ort t ;m from tnrnmo them find them a eood home. Some Such devotion does not go is RENTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY : 14�.+..� .4 ,4Vz_ e . • • � r s ® t ande„son of the by the intense heat of the by men and.. equipment the day. • hay continued breaking out founder, estimat- smouldering fire. •A thor- • ;from King County Fire pis- A spark caused by a met- this morning, Pringle add=., •,at $30,000, plus ough inspection. will deter trict 40 and several off-duty al object passing through a ed. "This is like ;a hug.. mage to the 60- mine if the building, con-- Seattle fire :fighter's, kept hay chopping machine had ' mattress fire. About the hay-s t(Yr a g e. structed in 1925, can •be the flames from'spreading. caused the earlier, smaller only way you can.be sure;of' used again. :The fire; reported at 12:21 blaze, Lt. Arthur Pringle of 'putting it out is'to take:the • 'ire Department The remainder of the feed p: m.; is believed to have the ' Renton Fire Depart- :hay out and bury it some-; id mortar in the plant, built- in the early ' started from the remains of ment said. - -where." ' • )ck•s t r u c t u r e 1900s, was not damaged, :,a;fire'workers thought they More than 150 tons of hay 'The chopping machinery, been weakened Renton fire fighters, aided had''extinguished earlier in had to be removed from the a'bulk-feed-delivery 'truck, • building and scattered in .a fork lift truck and anew the street. where it could be camper for Lande's pickup ' drenched-with water, Prin- truck, also were destroyed, gle said: • Lande said. ' Small 'spot fires in the: '(Photo, A 3.) • ' x June 11,2001 Renton City Council Minutes Page 180 .K * Construction on the East Valley Rd./SW 43rd St.Rehabilitation Project will begin July 9th and should be completed by September 25. * Coulon and Kennydale beaches will open Saturday,June 16th,for the summer season and lifeguards will be on duty from noon to 8:00 p.m.daily. AUDIENCE COMMENT Quentin Holt, 12219 SE 161st P1.,Renton, 98058,encouraged the City to Citizen Comment: Holt— establish a historical district,to which the Lande Feed building could be Lande Feed Building relocated. Preservation Citizen Comment:Holt— Iris Holt, 12219 SE 161 st Pl.,Renton, 98058,commented that she has been a Lande Feed Building customer of Lande Feed since 1977 and does not want the building to be Preservation destroyed. She stressed that the Lande Feed building should be retained as a historic monument for the Renton community. Citizen Comment: Widmer— Mark Widmer, 803 N. 1st St.,Renton, 98055,expressed his concern that Lande Feed Building Renton's unique character and personality is being lost with the destruction of Preservation historic buildings. He suggested that a plan be developed to save historic buildings such as the Lande Feed store. Citizen Comment: Carlson- Heidi Carlson-Beckley, 806 Index Ct.NE,Renton, 98056,remarked that Beckley—Lande Feed Renton does not have enough historic buildings and encouraged the Building Preservation& preservation of the Lande Feed store. On the subject of the Whitworth Ave. S. Whitworth Ave S Vacation street vacation request,Ms. Carlson-Beckley expressed her opposition to the vacation saying that it sets a dangerous precedent. She asked that the Council deny the request. Citizen Comment: Beckley— Phillip Beckley, 806 Index Ct.NE,Renton,98056, said that upon contacting Lande Feed Building two museums,he learned that there is no record of a building in existence Preservation&Whitworth Ave' similar to the Lande Feed store in the Northwest. Saying that the store is an S Vacation interesting place to visit,he described the construction of the building which is made out of wood. Regarding the proposed Whitworth Ave. S. street vacation, • Mr.Beckley expressed his surprise that the Council is even considering the request. Citizen Comment:Bean—St. Joe Bean,334 Morris Ave. S.,Renton, 98055,expressed his concerns about the Anthony's Church Vacation, St.Anthony Church request to vacate Whitworth Ave. S., saying that the Whitworth Ave S between S expansion of the church will not help alleviate the parking problems in the 4th St&Parallel Alley(VAC- surrounding neighborhood. Displaying photos of vehicles parked along 00-003 neighboring streets,Mr.Bean said he has noticed that instead of parking in parking lots that the church provides,patrons choose to park,sometimes illegally,on the surrounding streets. He urged Council to deny the street vacation request. Citizen Comment: Palmer— Daniel Palmer, 16638 106th Ave. SE,Renton, 98055, said that he is the Lande Feed Building organizer of the Citizens for Cultural and Historic Preservation in Renton. He Preservation reported that the citizens group is working with the Renton Historical Museum to seek out solutions to the potential loss of historic landmarks in Renton. One solution being explored is the establishment of a historic refuge site to house historic buildings,which could become a tourist attraction similar to Gilman Village in the City of Issaquah. Mr.Palmer commented that saving the Lande Feed store needs to be addressed now; however, looking towards the future,he asked the City for assistance in creating a plan for the preservation of historic buildings. He also submitted a petition, signed by 419 citizens,asking for the t RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting June 11,2001 Council Chambers Monday, 7:30 p.m. MINUTES Municipal Building CALL TO ORDER Mayor Jesse Tanner led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag,and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF DAN CLAWSON,Council President;TOM NELSON;DON PERSSON; COUNCILMEMBERS KING PARKER; TERRI BRIERE; KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCIL EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCILMEMBER RANDY CORMAN. CARRIED. CITY STAFF IN JESSE TANNER,Mayor; JAY COVINGTON, Chief Administrative Officer; ATTENDANCE ZANETTA FONTES,Assistant City Attorney; MARILYN PETERSEN,City Clerk; JIM SHEPHERD, Community Services Administrator; CHIEF LEE WHEELER,Fire Department;MIKE WEBBY,Human Resources Administrator;DEREK TODD,Assistant to the CAO; CHIEF GARRY ANDERSON,Police Department. PROCLAMATION A proclamation by Mayor Tanner was read declaring the month of June,2001, Hire-A-Veteran Month—June, to be "Hire-A-Veteran Month" in the City of Renton,recognizing that veterans 2001 are a well-trained,and sometimes untapped,pool of labor with a wide variety of technical skills, and Renton employers have recognized the lifelong j! contributions that veterans and their families have made. Don Sparks,Veterans Employment Representative with the Employment Security Department accepted the proclamation. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY PERSSON,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE PROCLAMATION AS READ. CARRIED. SPECIAL Chief of Police Garry Anderson awarded the Meritorious Service Medal to PRESENTATIONS Officer Brad Martin. Chief Anderson described Officer Martin's service to the Police: Meritorious Award to City of Renton which includes the training of new police officers. Chief Officer Brad Martin Anderson applauded Officer Martin's involvement in Renton's Field Training Officer Program which is recognized throughout the State as a model for training new police officers. Officer Martin accepted the medal and expressed his pleasure in working with new officers and assisting them with their training. Fire:Act of Heroism Fire Chief Lee Wheeler and Police Chief Garry Anderson awarded the Act of Meritorious Award to Richard Heroism Meritorious Award to Richard DeWitt. Chief Anderson explained that DeWitt Mr.DeWitt saved a four-year old boy from drowning in a swimming pool at the Crestwood Park Apartments by pulling him from the pool and rendering CPR. Chief Wheeler expressed his appreciation to Mr.DeWitt and presented him with a plaque. ADMINISTRATIVE Derek Todd,Assistant to the Chief Administrative Officer,reviewed a written REPORT administrative report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2001 and beyond. Items noted included: * Citizens are urged to use extreme caution when swimming,rafting, or tubing in the Cedar River between the Elliott Bridge(SE Jones Rd./149th Ave. SE Bridge)and Maplewood Golf Course due to dangerous conditions created by a landslide as a result of the February earthquake. June 11,2001 Renton City Council Minutes Page 181 retention of the Lande Feed Company historic structure and urging the Mayor and Council to take immediate steps towards the preservation of the building. Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler reported that the topic of historic preservation is currently in the Planning&Development Committee. Citizen Comment:Mech— Doris Mech,PO Box 452,Maple Valley, 98038,expressed her appreciation Lande Feed Building with the transformation of Renton since she came to teach in Renton in 1963, Preservation and described some of the positive changes she has noticed. Referring to the , Lande Feed store,Ms.Mech stated that she hopes something can be done to save the store and she supported the idea of creating a historic district. Ms. Mech also suggested naming the historic district the Timothy Schlitzer Memorial Historical District in honor of the former Renton Councilmember. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Council Minutes of June 4, Approval of Council minutes of June 4,2001. Council concur. 2001 Community Services: Senior Community Services Department recommended naming the new Senior Center Sun Room to be Named Activity Center sun room the"Rotary Sun Room" in recognition of the$25,000 Rotary Sun Room donation from Renton Rotary toward the construction of this project. Council concur. Plat: ROW Dedication at Development Services Division recommended acceptance of a deed of Index Ave NE/NE 6th P1 dedication for additional right-of-way at the intersection of Index Ave.NE and Intersection(SHP-00-014) NE 6th Pl.to fulfill a requirement of the Max Ryan short plat(SHP-00-014). Council concur. Plat: Eden's Garden,NE 20th Hearing Examiner recommended approval,with conditions,of the Eden's St(PP-01-007) Garden preliminary plat; 20 single-family lots on 3.41 acres located on the south side of NE 20th St.,between Dayton Ave.NE and Camas Ave.NE(PP- 01-007). Council concur. Human Resources: Human Resources&Risk Management Department recommended the Administrator Positions reclassification of the City's Administrator positions from grade 43 to grade 49 Reclassification for the purpose of maintaining the competitive edge with surrounding cities; and requested the allocation of$25,147.70 to cover the costs of the reclassification in 2001. Refer to Finance Committee. Transportation: Curb Ramp Transportation Systems Division requested approval to construct American Installation(ADA Compliant) with Disabilities Act(ADA)curb ramps at various sites throughout the City at a cost of$25,000. These sites have not previously been included in the City's Walkway Program. Refer to Transportation Committee. Transportation: Transit Signal Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of a contract with 1BI Priority&Traffic Control Group in the amount of$145,570 for engineering and architectural services Center Project Consulting related to the completion of the Transit Signal Priority and Traffic Control Services,IBI Group Center project. Council concur. Transportation: Six-Year TIP Transportation Systems Division submitted the annual update of the Six-Year (2002-2007) Transportation Improvement Program(TIP). Refer the TIP to the Transportation Committee; set a public hearing on 6/25/2001 to consider the TIP. June 11,2001 Renton City Council Minutes Page 182 AI:- In addition to the curb ramp construction at various City sites mentioned in item 7.f.,Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler requested that City staff investigate a citizen request she received asking that a curb ramp be constructed at the south side of the intersection of S. Grady Way and Powell Ave. SW. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. COUNCIL CONCUR. CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence was read from Kim Browne,Kennydale Neighborhood Citizen Comment:Browne— Association President, 1211 N.28th Pl.,Renton,98056,requesting that the City Aberdeen Ave NE Sidewalk make funding and construction of sidewalks along Aberdeen Ave.NE a Installation priority. She expressed concern for the safety of children,pointing out that children use this street to walk to school and to Kennydale Lions Park. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Transportation Committee Chair Persson presented a report recommending that Transportation Committee Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into the Local Agency Transportation: East Valley Rd Agreement with Washington State Department of Transportation(WSDOT) for Rehabilitation,WSDOT Grant grant funding for the East Valley Rd.Rehabilitation Project from SW 41st St. to Lind Ave. SW along with all subsequent agreements,grants and other documentation associated with this project. The Transportation Committee also requested approval of the resolution. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 184 for resolution.) Transportation: SW 7th St& Transportation Committee Chair Persson presented a report recommending that Lind Ave SW Traffic Signal Council adopt the resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into Design&Construction, an interlocal agreement between the City and Washington State Department of WSDOT Grant Transportation(WSDOT)for grant funding for the design and construction of a traffic signal at SW 7th St.and Lind Ave. SW. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 184 for resolution.) Public Works: Eastside Transportation Committee Chair Persson presented a report regarding the use of Interceptor Project,Use of mitigation money($500,000) associated with the King County Eastside Mitigation Funds Interceptor(ESI) Section 1 Sewer Interceptor Capacity Restoration Project in South Renton. The Transportation Committee having considered the matter of mitigation money from the Metro South Renton Interceptor Sewer restoration project and the need for the reconstruction of Lind Ave. S. from SW 43rd to SW 21st Streets has determined the following: a) It is important that the area known as the Burnett South Renton area have funds in the amount of$500,000 committed to restore and mitigate the nuisance they will have to endure throughout the life of this project. b) It is important and vital that the reconstruction of Lind Ave. S.be completed prior to any more deterioration of the roadway that would result in the total rebuild of the roadway. The Transportation Committee recommended the following actions: 1. Metro mitigation funds in the amount of$115,000 be placed in the South Renton Project account. The funds are to be used in the following manner: $75,000 for the asphalt overlay streets in the area and$40,000 to be used to ' Subrhtt}ed cut loll iI a001 PETITIONeAAAAkk. e, rudifil FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE NAME ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL 1 ZtEL \T vr,) )AIL? cL,u.169 "►'1A-e'• �q - CV--716.1 2 S-. /7/0/2 0,v /goy? .s 6 , 4V .- IY I2. /SS, 2',1N V2f-23 s--42sy 37706 CU T& Shork( /52 55 5E I -)I 5 PI. iik-jm 9j !) L/Z5/Z55'S1 J1 r�L 5+tbt(A@g . � • r r1i; 4 V. ADIgl 2307'— Ave, ` "\ial ofr- cigb 15 1 ,h- I L r�W6k7 t ' . ,r0 , 6 e?A_T___e____ 19S2- O .__, (1 ,(, )Vi. t:3 _ 6 7697 1 /qc/n6 /2 erA JIE '1 253 n- 8 ul/ /A4' J i P�U/o1Yc7)7`1)/,5ecs.G igk k V L lko 5b.l 4/4*,,py- 7- /v 5F ,Re 11! 26 s 10 Sac7T-F J L g L le-.7— 1 o7 D I AN D/t,, dES 11 (P17d PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE NAME ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL ?.erns &c7 I I .e yes 2), ( is 2 1-12C2/ ) o (3405 S& �a�71� �T[�J/� 253- 6 3l.46 lc 3 aCC1 nP GL. Z Z( S 114 ' Eeet. za 770 -I 4-Z 41 C i( ri: 3a1 56 . 5+. ,-) 77- 5127 c A4te 1, /gd�� -YZ./ /wz7 5'i//iI 24 42 73 f 6 ` A.u0P, SC-k0 S /C' 36 OCI,017M, a25(-(t (q 7)4-04 - 7 y'3/ �'o. /y am/cam/c-A Au A v& 7 try=' � 8 " • �� � 76227- (/�r41 4-�7, ' Se . , /2C�;aN Lun 9 334,L. "(. -Aft It S Se_c n 6 co,9$// 10 Ar l.P,fig bmlimfc (o3m Co/n-Tpl , (14_ °Ms— zs8 E 2 Sci 011 PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE NAME ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL r 1 d4E / e ) / LS17q(9 / a7/3/0? �. 2 `B ram.✓;d o, LU r c7)/ /7 //AYE /6 S 1/0 5 >27/--c 3 (14 I- / ( 1/E 1,‘ 4 z/vk-e v /7// A/s /6 a- 5 M /074 5 P..0-eA1 C- 12 -C • So � D53-SZ4,-g32z 6 T 3723 WE 64-k. 5 i: 92s .2S 1/621/sc 7 rlM- SkirckalS 1 T-t IO \Mapl e Uoit On " .baci q D5b30 i 9 • . 8 1""��9�i ip //Try'�i � �e9ro �E/�D r/.� - /�� 4 2 = 5432 )/ r J �/1 ,x 9 ��u, ¢ e.v7.kw 1 (fa �‘7 �l E v?/i7 [/ N cl//vN�. ,P E- 1 ✓✓✓ / Me& g165- f/6/ qi7,f-0.7a6-2v-- ; C6/ PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE NAME ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL a y 1y1,24., ,ff,c, te. Qnc'> /94��' e v �7",77�� 1,�r u'>K o �W • 2_gCi l.o-f� .c, � c fl ,P80,z Sa. MO SEp-1 . �'13-',R5 z / A Z ta UL.corn 3 ) 16,Q o 1S 6 A,.z. SE azA0, wA ga5ig 4 L-ae , zy 6z ,cputi gcK Ssss2 ssH-r;L ti 93/3 8 /ni-4+7ooeJJ/+o.ccr- _ �� 6 .�- , I /firf77,-S7tifSU"71l6ur(/ £ o 98/R1 ¢q ' 2' 6;a r 7/3 s.�, /J ���G /moo/J 7 c7 H 7 (Vaci,..e �i/o� �-� t ? �'�—� �� (?�- 1 u ,Xc� 8 m4v, + Ln-mr n ICAY ) - SE rkY ,LeA 9 Rob n \fe.cnd eA n S ( s 4' S l t>;11(A.t., Sf. S-Ca. J Et{JA 18118 PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE NAME ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL 1 IA_____:-( C I S \\L-1 E. ?-to l LizSZZ6.is i 1 2 Jean MOS1AWn 1201 ( 1 4 AVE SE irnf on J/ yZS-Z 3s-o.StZ 3 3 c Y L e_ ) t-ve, --- 3 20 4 N' 7 PI S - 6,en i- (/Z s 2 7/-,5 IST 4 6?- .._0411\ 0_,,,c; C 7Y / 4 fL 5-‘co/1 w71 V y/ 7k V 5 5)17 52cd .C336 So1- %sPr / 9 /28- 6 Accra �,c e.� 3F/5 NE V 67 i4,2 74 C ff leer bI7 Gt9 , 0 f a 8 �� 7 4,f.i -v,, 2,e_ec2 .. .__ 1.3.-,o2 .-- /(, ,',A./- .5---2‘- -• delk-t,e )--;--t. ' / a,/t.6e( '9177' 8 -.)-1/ 4_,d---;-3/1-ze Q:3)-ifri-e-4,--)-5 (- --9 - /,0 /.° _ ----'.1-) � (ems/-�� Zs-����• ��� 10 e-c:\ht c\\VACmCth 201`I Se -2"-PL _,,201-Du. IA /f2s-4/31)-3zos' 91oss c t•ta-\ 5 D f` � el PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE NAME ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL 1 (.e fr-%s L, Cr//16 e� - 3, i/C- sf .2: 77z- 331 jay,-SJiar-t a 2 jaal Pàllard longvres Acre S S th/4.. l�/l6 cm7r hamt)- "r1 3 14 t\t%\ ()�se.v-, 9 La. Su,nS-e.- 216A, 1NC, B-I keh6, L 9 go(n 4 M G_A__ ok r,Sro 9 (.. Swnse4 2(A N E -4-1 'etv,4-0 n, tA)n , 9gg S(c 5 <560.50L(f.pr 6,2-6 5‘z L I coo c__tozze\,suR. }DL- 1. 6 Uen 4— l`oic3o 1 i2 3 yg77i it•/`z S SCA 14'' 98//e 7 12 o h; H Vu 4 z 47 47 36 714 AVE C 5 E A 7-'c- L E 9 g 11 g C° eowa cvrG% 8 CAnS y mcCAP? 401Z 95ivivA,-01AR-S rrA) r- �- vn)j gig gr� 9 �i�,�// �A//i cag. kGr/ S e'd.S, 1 :1`'Y I &V th A(56io. t.m25;vieOrsz,-% iE4i71 On 7165? PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE NAME ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL 1,,r,rtmL( SL/ 175413- L6(2.Q„J, '3: ici t• SE .;4e gas s z)( C9G3 : 7 / 2 5/(-'(-?,Z l( N -Ld e (-- V-5 e5k( //2'1-` - C' 20c, ) 62&2. 0 7,3- e 3 7;% 7 WV-a- -/ (S---CA%-/,- __ / !s, `. - 6. Lz S= 7 -57 4 ezi/( a/v)(< rrA,SVb �1 g -moo, I A -6-, L7e3 ( l 61,, 7/, 2i '. 7 a/Att4,6/& U4kjVE RenSyn ILIA 980,c6 - Lp;--J, ezefe,<, - do 4 .9,0,52. -- 7 1361. 5-4----/-K..a .4 ca-r----g_L; ' -Pc'-6 7/eff /,__e4( S(--e),-(_.)/ rie, ..C-7--/aS 8(&-wA/1 -1_ .2/5 a) ,W_„ _____Z.L/4,/:pc?-6-s---S— e, 9 . '71,,r„A, 7.or VOC 63 Z,i, tfr_ 9e03--7. q3, 1 - 0,,,p • ' -5 ��i S. \Q, -6- . .Q, . '65. 118 C PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE NAME ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL go2 yo- /fifth ,JA,4w5KxC yrr7f /a/ 2 C'D Cu,,//i _S /cV037 73 44e .�o i� f7PC/��)f k'IQ 4w'ie_Ce Pi 3 4Lce__'(5),?L--tt, EA41 4 JcnCto --14 1/46 161E `1 11/454 — . . 1/,c_._ ftQ eNi 4n-,k it ( 0-4o 1`I 21' m - -'t.r ` P S-a-7 7 -Co?oco. L �r LDS o3Jfl 10-k avz sc_a Ul 2 -30..Li'l S 8 "1 2 / S 4 (2©6)32 -(J7? 9 'Do (o{ 2_2i ) . 1,/L1 Ud - cSG Jam' 10 �Lt1 t Yt o��✓•; 33" i : So, YYI Olt rADI - 9 Y 13' 72-s=8P'a ti PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE NAME ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL 1 DAuk1iq- N-01-)rJ5z- g-uoci f4A-i2RINC:77P MVe'VF 1 rrt -r 2 C Iaw-1;c_ .64Ce I214-IZ ,5 161o, iZziirmi 3 4/4 V ii4 r M7 /)/R 7//r)r-4 G�1 / 9 V 5.e ,e(1p ram / IlA , 65-63/-/}o f 4 Se,e,,) O f ,J_J--- 5 J7 S W 1 GEI Ave, so, 9" )05 025)223-77(cr'S G.1lecites-,c o re, (i7ics4 &.rn.e 1853;-- ' 3 , S C 120 A-tom. (ras-) -l65N � 62),( �� /� _,/ �� 72�c/S . ±12 � ,6� , Q8i7? • 7 . i jJ Z 2,' S-o y 0,,,t59 �;- 'z�/� . 807/7 .e ry/ .?" I r, N e6P.oe i my) 4Ai/m, //),v R5/cO J.,„,, ___5Y69efe=0-,„ / - 9 - ao‘oy 5,4, 2(‘-& MI/de ihriiy ta /g038 l 0 4/%104 ��e e ‘ &6.61 ,E, 26 Aiic gl(1 ( VA, ?96sB PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE NAME ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL 1 Aije ` ,vyi-e. A/1^ 4/ 1/ 65-A Gs eff 2 <g‘ 3(rOthcr E06 77Z. ( iek, '* t s7 z2 - (22 z. ,5"./1///'Pe ea iv, 5 4/Ai L Dicrnk- IIPLIG s--s Lr1.9v so S res 4 3G7fli 6 CL-I JE'/r`f /Nl ( <[ / < < 1 7 73eK ix NUeZZe. / W 3 5 P7`f--`' -26 peg �Z 2 -o3s7 .1. 8 5 h� )(iP At ( cizze7 `' / - et 2S 233-^o3s 7 (3c0o / '-K �R, u1 �S. 7 l-�0 6 - 17 ,2- 393 9 a S w/. ni/7 S 10 r 1�. 2 0 • \``) j1i i ! Dear Louise George; i I was raised in Renton went from Henry Ford School ! ; to Kenton High School...M Mother worked Y in the 4e ;�r Renton , Hardware Co. . .My dad was greenskeeper for , - .Earlington and Maplegrove Golf ].inks in the 30*s. . ��' i -p _ I think we should preserve as muc els t e town can � I for you feel How do \ � Historical_ sites. 1 r -� M If I liyed ;Loser I wo ld voluntc c ..c . = about this issue . . cn o cn .o Bill and I wish you all the best in your - 4' r a) co - undertaking ahead. 1 .L / _ • ^1 o a) c Sincerly, v(/ -6 /1; • _ CL Q 1 I am interested in prese mg o 'o o • 0 �, , Renton, please contact me! cZ = N tY 1 1 [...:1Not Interested. 1• !• .. 'r Si me up for the committee. -- • Vt.° ] Contact Information: . ji ' : Phone: _: N 1 EmailJ.:), ... N tij o 1 • Note:' 0 �U I ... II _ Y�1 ro .- • iI M i 1 [00. . 41 H. ...' Please cut off and remail to the _ RHSociety Historic Preservation Committee. Thanks! • . 1 I • . _ _ _ _ • • How do you feel . . . • - • . 0 ,., „ . . . i.J . m e0 . . c.,I am interested in preserving IS' Renton, please_contact me! . 4 _ [ ] Not . - .. • . . . [ . -] .Sign-Me up for the committee, -__ _-- . _ 7: . = _ c•-•). = M Contact Information: - ......l.. _... _- _ _ -0 Phone: _ 471. ,-6--- _25-5-- 2.1-9. ...5-- .. _ :: _ .- '-S tp c --3 — CO (D '... n o - ?... s _. •=:-.7_ (./1 `" C:t: - f Email:----L- - -- ------- -- - - -- -- _ . ___-: 0 0 Li) I g 6 -ti• . 4:-.--- ..... -4,,,.. .-: :--,....,,i• ..-- - Nj r-I----..... (1 . Note: • ____ _____ ______ _ _______ _ _ = 4J CD W UJ = •Z_ = CD :._.... 7. i --- 7.1 - CD , . (D . :.-...-: :. • CI- --- _ '' •.-i•4,4,0,."... -it., -- 4,40 '•et,* IT..1, _ _= .._ , . Please cut off and remail to the ---- • .1 (((, -RHSociety Historic Preservation Committee. Thanks! i _.__ ---------- . - . . . • Ilio . - . . _. . _ - . . How do you feel . about this issue? . • . . .. • , . . , [ ] I am interested in preserving :, . • Renton, please contact me! , • -. • --- ._ . [ ] Not Interested.: - • • • •• ' . .• .._ - . (D W rj.-) (D = Ul r-r = •: c-t- 0 r-1- : • [ ] Sign me up for the commi-ttee. - • . 0 :z _i. 0 = _ n = • . I [-t.-. • 1- ---.Contac,t_•-. • n.f• orm. ation: ::. - -- : ': <rs=cCV.. . Phone: - : -- Email: 17 - -- • • : •. • '-d 0 0 (j) - 1 C = c-r----.... CI. - - Note:__ - 7-)zzet-Pit-nr t-,• 4 -..„ 2,..„....... ,.. .. t „ se ...4 (D 4"--7,---e-r-r/.4-.1 ....A....c.....Li. .4.....,---;,-, .1\ "TI - • .'-'ce-A.' - , c".a..11-ctki • -; 47,evf_e_, A-4t-ic) 21./Xed - • (D • • - vi•NJ cu -c) ,. _.. ._ ,.., . ..j. , : . (2. . •- • ,-l-zLz--- f -.:.", ::. . L.'''' 'i . c7't- -) ,-;° :.1: - • • -- -E-gp-Iii (D. ,:c..e.'aid ,tezy__•-,_ "•- •.---0-72-7, • /Ca 9 / /. . . . • • -0 = CD 111 c'1 t P "i242 • iZA4 2°a / .. : Please cut off and remail to the . . - RHSoCiety Historic Preservation Committee. Thanks! . _ ___._. • -777 - • . _.1}-e-a--'1_ • . . • ,,ag•-•,...r....• ...!. , i , ,,,,--.. • - , ,,,\!.-E 4, 1 ,'''' ..; . ;,..,,-------T. , • •••,..1 '. i ,,,,__ ;,,,,.—... 11. .--o.• - .....; -- '-) --/.2-,iJ 4-'1 9"Sics'r, • . ,n • .- • •. (.11 : - ...0.•.;..,,,..........--• ' 1 CFS WR ! , .., ',...---------•LZ...^^^^^",--•-rr7--"...":-• --....-- . . ; . . . 1 • . . . • • . . • ! , • . • ' . . •• , . • • . • . ! . • ' •• . . • , . . : • ••. . . ! • ' .. • , . • • : ' . . . . . . .. , . . .' . Renton Historical Society; • Historic Preservation/Lande Feed • , • 235 Mill Avenue South . . Renton WA •• 98055-2133 . . • • • .•,• • i • i . . . • ; .. • • • . .;. . . , . . . • .. . • . .. ., ..... . . . . . • • , .. . . . . . • • . . s .r.0.-,Ii.e..1.1...-4.-fs .til : . : Araio:iiiiii'miiiiiiihittliiiilliiiiioniiiiiiiiiiiiiii•ii • • • • . • • . .. . . . . . ,. • . • .; . . • • . .., . . ., • . . . • ; •". ; I. .•. . • . . • r./; . . • • i : . CD.. . 1 . • • ; • •• bir) . •... ! . . " •/— .—.;• ' • • .. . • . • g..) ..) 0 i . , .,. . .. . 45 '4.) . . • . . . ... , • .. .4-. • C.'ii (1..) 1 • . • .. • 1. :,.. 1 . . • 1 • • ; ., 2. •..N. . • . ci) ci, I . 0. • . .. . , .. t. . ! . .. .. . 0 1q • . • •r-4 • ;-4 s !. Q g cKS C.) ' - • f:Li a.) ' 0. . H.1 ; 1 i 0.) •0 . . .. • ...4....., $... .,_, C/) . 0 ID — ; . - 4--. • •.--4 • 4—) . Ct • • • • . ,• . • ' . • •••••1 . 4 1 • • • ;..4 , .. . ! . . ci• . , • • • - . 0 ' . Y4 ro . (+-4 ::(I) •. . ... . ...... •:7.7... i "i7j . ' -4 ) . • , CD • ci—i •; , , 1--.:,-...,*... • : • Ci .........4.4 cn .. • •-. 74—' • er, ....c4_(.....:. • .... . . • ! -•----- -7]...........:1 75,1P-4: 0 41 : Cil... '- di.''. ei. • 7 . ....! .. 7',.... . . . • c.):'.0 -.! . .•:.- • . ;_iCl.):.. 0•:. i—i '.' ., -.. --• :..• • ; • . 1 • : .•• ::: ci)-;•.• , 1 -• r") i 0 . . . •' • • rn .• 4...) CD CD ..1-.4;•:: ..• :14; 1., • e—r.,.. .4.1-4.1:4‘.4, •,,:, ..0:::::'... ' ..,...:. 1 4:, . * — .4-44 0 11.+....( g ...a:„ _ ..•• • ,.., ... .. • , •, ..,...... , . c). 4..) .,--1 . . • •,• !fi.,1,114..41.' ....d;! ....a..)-y.,1•‘w . . . .. . . . .• .r.,,: ..• • . - . , ... . . ." - . .•;::.-„,„ . . 1 ..,-..,•0-il-•'.-0..triik-cti,;., (1) . „ ! • • ' • E .4- ) • -4'3 , a ,:"...; • ,...,.., . , .. 0.,.: ..„,....,,,. ..,,,..., . • 0 Cd • ) I ,:.) •,•,--4 ....,.. :,;,4,:j:,.;_i i : ...., 4-4 .:C/) :l.. .r.• p...i. : 1..1 '-''Z lilt' • , . . 71 . r---i r1 r1 . • i. • • i :". , i . . . . I . . , . .. . ':- • ------ — - • - . • . •• . •. • • - " • • _ _ • . • "S• - N‘ How do you feel . . this .. . about issue • (- 0 * e . r•• a . . • , a• [ ] I am interested in preserving • 1 . • _ ..Renton, .please contact me. _ _ - ' ___ -, - . [ ] Not Interested. - - • ---- __ ::::. __ (D Li.) m• (D - • • = Lri e"-4- m - _ - . • [ I Sign me up for the committee. •- . — • . -- - r I Contact Information: ... : __ ._..___.. _ ....- ' • . _ _ . _- Phone: - _ . .. . _ - 00 (1) ' • - CD Ln ci: t . _ • -Email: -.- ----.---- - ----- - - - .-- ,— -- l'sj e—t••....... r) 1 -- 7 SE.-,.. .1.--:. LsJ DJ (I) A j •-•-k Note: _ __ - • __ _ ... _. ....., _ CD I s 42:y (1:1. - ,11 • .i-r.• •,____,. . -. . . ; 12.. 0 "1E7 :• • . _ : - ,. .-_-_: •,' E: : -..!_ . -; -.... . - • .. ..I . . . , , .-t• . V, . . . .--- -. Please cut off and.remail to the --- •' •RHSocietv Histo-ric Preservation Committee. Thanks! • . : . : : ' , . . . .. . . .:. • . .• . • ,- ., . . .. • . . .. • . . _... . - _.•-.-• • . • . • ' - •• --... .- . . . .. . . • .. ... - • . . .... ---- •• . : .. . _ ... . . -1's`frt -q.l'a. ,... - •. -.• •• • -• . . - --• . . . . -;:.!'..-1....?a.::!=i;_•,•! . . . . . -•--- - : - - - - • ' . „ .. -•.. . _ - I cen,..r,,-?'.g):,v.: ----• • • -• . . • I. 0.:41-1i. To • . • • ... . . -• • . . . . . . .- - . . . _ ...... .. . . 4 c4 g 2 C2.244,6. ' . • • -.- ". - . .. . • :"tkr.07 rn• ..-1. ' - ..- . - . -- . - - - - ...". •-• " . . .. . . . • = - •. --,•-• '4.• E.-n,.1-.:. . .. , .. •• • •• _ • .• ,•• . : . . . . , :ten 3-C3 r1-7t„.; •- . . • r'Ll*1 za. . • , A.,›B-...c.r,: How do. you. feel . , 0 . 0....„. ig...,., . -....:. . :.• 71 F.1 o 9;...: . .: -------- . . 9. • . • ablaut: this issue • • , ..„.„.„.7. :..._.. . • ,...„,,,,..,,,..„.„,,!,,,. . ... . • . . . . . ,f....,_,...,..„.„ ..... • . . . , ...• .. . • ....,„ ...,. :r... .t.ki-Ti&—tt. ..e-i•zW—fr.f41--,..ii,c-,,,,t-.. .,r,-......-,s, 7..•"— "" ; :• 0 • \ ••. - ' • -:----',.:-- -1:PR§z!VAIC,1-0rPYRI-Poocrrt., - ,. • _. • .. . -_..-- • .-':'1'- • - ,44;0",-,2m.: a2 ri r,,Tmigin3,-;•,;) ' : .• . . 1 -:. - • •L:-- - - v.-%•47tt-_ ::: - .4.___;* j• • •: •.....'" • f',. ."Secriiin WA 9a3M , 4--. • _ • - - . • . • . . .. __. * • • • • ::-- :. 1. -.;-,7- :..:•-: •- • ••-. --- .•.••• -rae,":66s 1-14TraTtrt.ii Cz).-- - ••. .. . . _.. ... . . . . IA in. . • . ... -I- . • . . . . • . " . • .-I am interested in preserving .- • . • 0 . - • .,. . • :::_.._..: - - - .:..1 . ., . . • : . Renton,- please contact'me! • . ____ Ckl • • . . . •• ..... . . •= _ --* .. [1]. Not. Interested... '. • .. • : . -• : . . x i••.) xi.. . _ _ - • a) (...3 r,-,- (D •. .... st4 = - - ------ • • r-i-• 0 (--r • _ . _.. . . [1 I Sign me up for the committee. •_. --, 0 . _ . = = n• = . - • ... _- . .. • = * > 73 m -i •-• [ ] Contact Information: ..._ Ph (D •_ r_i- • . z, =-• = Fei P.', --,..,' 1• . "'"-... V) C --I — one: , (Do - 6 8 . 3 - qh-kC?kb. ---- , ., -0 :L.-. ..... . " • i ? y . 'El •. . '.1; ...t.:."::-...--; Edna.' E \s.,...,,, ,.. ..._.. ‘.:_..„ :. • . _. .7.... = . • . Note: ' Cipt.J1 A4.45a .- 61e. - . .: .. .-: (...0 O. ' • . :._ • " 1 ik , i \ . • — 71 ,....... CD . . . (D - .• '72.;--:::::-:;'-1-- ...-' --,' 0 a . . ._.... ---- fa. . ' :. _ . : : . . . • , u ...,-.1 2 re..."--,2-t_ p • ..-.-•• i i :: .-:• t . , •-••• t,. !I: • ; : ( . " 41'. ...• • '...'1.1 , •• LI •: 7.i ,, .. , . .. . .. . . . .. _ .. -.-.. . . ... . ... -. .. . ......- .. .. ...- ..__ . — • - - • • -- - .— rf:g• KL'A.. •-'s i I e .-- . . ) ' Please cut off and remail to the i . • i . . . . . • . . .i ; i 1 I : . RHSociety Historic- Preservation Committee: Thanks! '. . - . .. ... • • .,-. i f. (.• : • ----- - —.1.. .• ':•iIII I • . , . . - -.... . „ -,• , - - 55 •' i ar CA EAVEA gIILS No, . . P 5K *Q 9' How do you feel <c. co 6 ?fLij g - •.... ,-:.•.ab out this issue? • go g. . , ......-,.,_ - • ;.,. _ • . . ...:, .. • • • Ett . . r, • . [ ] I am interested in preserving \ -I- , t•-,- Renton, please contact me! 6, _ __ _ [ ] No. t interest0d. • - •.= _ 20 N.) = 20 • • — • (D CA.) ;4. (D -- .. = Ul r4 = S . [ ] Sign me.up for the committee. - - _-- = 0 Z --t 0 - • • - ..--. .: • ' ' -.: / •_ .. ----. •"- ''- . . = . [ ] Contact -Information: ••• . , ..* › "a ? . E V6-6, .___. ._..... . . . 1 1 . f --7.•-..f-'•-::-.•Phone: -.. G :- .' ----s--- s--- --_- -.1- -----C 0--6--_-.,--I\--- _......................... - •._—:—: .-. _ _,A cuLDorii acoCf, -. -- . —(=2.-7>.-'.•..C__y.._ e\•( -Email:- . - - - - - -- - . r-, • ,_,. ._., r- .....• Lk) = sZ •:: CL _ _ CD 1 • - --_—_. • • • i • ; • / . , . • -....- rt. , . , ! : . • _ .., . . ca. ..... ....• ,, „_,__. 0 ,"or •.• ti) t.) 675 __ , 11 1 • - 1 ..'... .... ' ..,/ --'" I . 111 , .. -. . . .. . .. • 1 . .- •••- - 'P ease cut off and remail to the _. -. i ; ; . . _. _ .... RHSociety Historic Preservation Cominittee. Thanks! t 1 • 1: \ \ % % . • How doyou feel • - . . --- • . • • _._. about this:: lssu_e__. _ • • =' I: am interested in preserving . . F .. • • - = - . Renton; please contact me! ; ;:..: . . X r•.) = X. [71 Not=Interested. . r ;. VI U1 r--r __...rl. • [ ] Siupfothecdfl1mittee. -° _ [ ] Contact Information: y < � • Phone. - � 00o Is./ Email: • w Note: '% - . .\ I ....„,a6e.,_. tev or . I i.R. /144,..-1!J R ! __ • 6 - •` ° ' Please cut off.and remail to the . • . 1(7(( Ii RHSociety Histori• c Pre ervation:Committee:'Thanks! y ‘,L. - :.)t • How do you feel . •... • • 10 .g.- r-P- • about this issue? . o 0 o ____Cs, \D to 0 N 4\ l., Pk] I am interested in preservingIti . � U Renton, please contact me. U I tr 1.‘)" [ ] Not Interested. __: W =. (D 0 [ -] S me up for the committee. ' "__ = 3 [ ] :,_'' 4- fact=:Inforrriation: - .. y <.fp N g �_ _ Phone; _ CO � = , s. o _In am: C. r ,Cr E -. - - - Note . . . - - ._ - C ? ? -:� toialyel, - dift — fe 110, ,.. ,e _ ._. , .. , -n "C--\ \ =;-:Please cut off and remail to the • I RHSocietyHistoric:Preservation Committee. Thanks! ti ► I .. . . . . . fee .. . _ :. . • . How do you _______.. . _.• . . . a ______ ___________ _ ou 1s1 u .. . . . .1 . . . .. . , o Vi- -- I am interested in preserving -. Renton;. P;z al �_=- _ _. - ! W [-] Not Interested... : . .. _ _ = 3 0 =rt [ ii Sign me up.. for the committee. =- D _• Contact Information: = (-D _, n, • •J -o --- - • _ Phone: 4jc- ---. = U7 611 Sr.0 = Ln O o Cr'' _ Ni n Email. , - -_ a_ rD \ \ \ i \ , , Note. �F. ; - _-4 -7-�i 4 ✓` "L7 ems_ , .. -. _ _ ..CL .. . /..1,i fihrf-.lap•uu ' • Please cut off and remail to the — . • ( (.1(.11 . ...!: • iSocie Historic Preservation-Committee. Thanks! • - m . . - ..,„ r . How feel ..,.; _ _ a , ___ __ b t thi e . -S �::1SSL1 .. - . • • 1 _ - - - I am- interested in preserving-:C p g -. . Renton, please contact me. ' : �..::. Ni = :_ _: _ : [ ] Not Interested.. ._. _ (D W ( _- 3 -T. 0 [ ] Sign me up for the committee. D _ �N"; [ ] Contact Information: = - D < (D cn _ - 03 CD " Phone,'Sb) �2,5--, 2 7 -- . co ° o Email:, 1 _ -. W :J Note: = w a r - (to \ =- (DfD --).) ) ) ) / ‘ g 1 1 ` NA)jj , — en .M1 Y f� .. -' I . , Please cut off and remail to the iRHSociety Historic Preservation Committee: Thanks! '= !.. Ir _ • . - - - -- . - . ..., ....:-...- . _ . . _ S's e.izi• How do you feel ....,..= ..._ • 0.•_,. . ,• _ •_ . „..,.,... __ a . _ .,. • ..; . ,..., .....,. ,..... . _ . -.. ] 1 .- -- ' - - ' - ' -----__ am interestedin preserving . • 4 , Renton, please contact me! . . ....„. . = [ ] Not Interested. _ . _ ._ ._ • 7a r•-) 70 • , --u..)(D (D cn . _ M. 0 rt [ I Sign me up for the commiftee. _ •_ = • _ . [ ] Contact Information: __. _ . z_ > < i•-Dt (.7, . • _. L._ (D u.) rt • ..7— CD C --1 Fi• . , B Se,- i Phone: # td,6(.0-. .17 17)-7_ : 5 61 0 y - , . -a ui _ :7- u-i 0 0 En ._ - • t• Email:iz--r. • .•• , . = c, = , ,_,••,.... (-) ) , -- r.. ....... 1_,. = r— ,T..• t 9 62,0 t.. • . . .__ ..:- (A) 0.1 Note: , • -- __ CD --- .42121s-e1(4"‘-- .._ :7" M , ::—• CD 1A,„„, Ethel Telbart -- CD 0 I, , • •- _ ..._ . .- I, ( c I 1 I I g ''''t_. ,'sat'.-. : is,e14ait4:31:,3wa i n5A8i e r.A ve_:It 339 .- -- A-4- . Please cut off and remail to the --- . ,I • ' RI-ISOciet).T Historic Preservation Committee. Thanks! . . . • - .I)) ) .., . •. . .. • . __________ • . . .- . . _. . . . . - . ••• • - . ..--: . . .- - -- . .--- . . • • - • • . .. ..- • -. . . . . . . . ,.1 . _ . ...... . _ . . • ci, • ° oo PV •,' " • .. . .. . . .. . . .• ,.. ,. . - . ., . • • • .t.i . t -• .. . - - - - - . >5, •... :.::..i:-.:1:':--.. :.,":-.1--' • . E xs'-' ... ,,.,,f:;. i How do you feel ., ,i. _ , • about this... issue?.. . • . . - - • _ . _ __. .. . .‘, . .. . ... . .....,.. . . . ---- •-- • _.. . .... . ._ _.. , . , . - . • . _ .. . . . . . . - • • • - . ,. . ,•..• . - . . ..:. . _ . _ ,... • • . _ . , . • -• - vi I am interested in preserving . •'. . . . • •• • • •• , - ,, ,, , ,i , • , , , ,, •:, ,,- .; :- . •. • ..• :• . „ „ ,•,. :. ,, .. „ , „ ,f , Renton, p ease contact mer.. • . _____. _ ____.. . . ._. _ . _ . •- [ ] Not Interested... - • air UJ.ai• (D r-r 0 rl. [ ] Sign me up for the committee.. 0 z ....c. 0 . _ n = [ "if] Contact Information: • • —1. • • Up C -I< n • Phone: - - , 00 CD . , , CJ1 -• - • ui 0 0 V) . Email: • . , = 0 i r....) ri•"....., n. • UJ ill r-i• Note: w = _ _ 4- 0 . -.• L i ve- . /Tv CL / cAML CD . 71 IN I qi fRo Yr) CD -) . • „D . ,.. ta. N t.„ NJ Di -0 f-r CM 71/4 tj C t9dAj 1/°11.-- I Alta*, Ld 0.761 . .nscu . CD•.< in " ...... • •• oj a) 1--' / f'd i_ go yn. 1_141._11. • .. - • , •I k -- •s • k Please cut off and remail to the . WG--v AIL-- - - • < , _NA k i - RHSociety Historic Preservation:CoMmittee-:-.Thanks! .. - • ‘ztlw, i c ___41 • . cy) . ; ,<. . . . ,___ ._ . ef) .,\., - -..1( • . . , . . . • . _ . 4 . _ . . -• - - • . _ • . . . . . . , . . c-i- a ou hi, _issue , _ . . . _ .• . ., . . .; . . . . . _ How do you feel [x] I am interested in preserving Renton,,please contact me! . , [ ] Not Interested. - - - - - - (D LA ui• (D Er 3 0 Et) [ ] Sign me up for the comm.----ift- 66-.----' * ›. .73 [ ] on:Contact Information: . . a) ci,) pt. = (D '-' mt. tcDo 2 n • Phone:ic.----7,?5-5- F/z,. Email: N j r-t•---.. CI. LO Sj '•Z Note: LJ CD CL tn N al -0 (7-) Fs o:63 FD- Fa 3 13•:<-0°' • 13 = rd fp • r-r- Please cut off and remail to the RHSociety Historic Preservation Committee. Thanks!' • IN,..,.: -,,1 . • : -7-7—- . • . . . .. .. . . .. . . . ... . - . • . - . . •-• ' .•-... • • •• - . • * . . • • . • .. . . . . .. . . •. - . • .116w do you feel • . about •- . ..this issue? • - „0 . • . . , . • ,., • . • r, . ---,,, .- am interested in preserving 0 . . . Renton, please contact me! . -,1 . • . _. .. . . . . . .. . • ] Not Interested.- ....... •• -. ...... . • • - , 7:3 r•-) = 70 . _ . ....... _ . ] 1 Sign me -•up for the committee, _ _ . . . Lrl ,-,- = • . t-r •0 rt. . = • . .1 . = _ (-.) = Contact Information: -, ••.- - . ..:._ • • -- . ....... . * › -L, • . • • (1,---.1 s-6-,( - _ . -----• - •. > < -F6 En •• • - . - -. . :_:: .(1) .cr) •r-r •-. • . - "= - • " - DI, . :-.L .upp.q: I.. .. :. ,?s--.72 -----72_6. .1 • .7,- . . . _ LID C • —• • . . --- :•J 1 - : .:-:—• • . .' 00 rcs , -n ''- : - - . .. • . . .. _ . . . :.:. ... . . . • • \ * - f--::'Email•-- -]-: ';'---.-2:• • ••-• : -. - ---i• - , _-.,-:- . ' . .,--.i. li .. .. ' • 1 .7-- . _ . , •--r. .. - •• _ ..---• _ .:. . . • , r-t••••••..... (1.? . • • • . .. • _ • .____Note.:. ...__ _ . ., .- ,- (D • . . ..- . . .... . .= • • 1 C9 )4/ril-L-f / ,fr)Vvr_, • = • _ : .. _7. . .J‘'..i'Vefk -6?4:(4 •if.1 ' - • • -.:.; := ....__ _.. CL t -...-.._ •-• " .'..-- -: a)i .-t:ti/. I.. 91--'- 20-TS— • -....- •- - = r .4, 14‘.-•• 1 . • --- .....•- • ., - - ." . i .• Vi 1 1 . . .-._ • Please cut off and remail to the ----- ,... • ---.. RHSociety Historic-Preservation Committee: Thanks! . . . • i i ( ( ( . . i \ -------- . . - . . ..._._, .t . • . . • .• - • ------ • - , • . 00 . , . - • - . . . • • - - - - - • •-. How do you feel . . , • ., •.,• hiS . • abou L [ 1S sue • z. . ,.;, • _._._ . . / in . L. 0 •.\\1 I. 0 [\ ] I am interested preserving 4- P . ( . . , .. ..._Renton5 ...pleasecontact me! ._ _ -. -Co , . • .. -.\•k- . , . _ _ { . ] Not Interested. . _ . -- _ . .__ • (ci LsJ - CD : • --- . Ln r-t• = [ ] Sign ine .:up or the,committee. • _ = _ n• = . = 4 S .= › [ ] -Contaa:•lliformation: - ' . . ' ...:''''''' :-.;. -_ < CD in ,...<", -0 ,- — .. fp v) r-r . LI • _ ,...„ :.h t :( _ _- = . Q. 00 • •P one 4 72A- )•:2__::2':".?:— 7:77 ::.-4c 7„,:.- • ... . . _ _-- . • - • • • • •• •••-f. =- . • . • . . I fi 17 • C11 .•... 02.- a) . w J . •. ....- -.a • 1, . -'•• • • . ' : . ::•-•- .. . (.71 c. maill: - •-• ....- ...t...:;•,,,,•:.. .7:•'v. .-:••?,-- 0 7,:.--•,.,:;.-i--'—- -- --:''7.. .•---T- Ui 0 -0 Cfl•- 1 C = 0 • ' -- - - - - - - -----— - -- - - - • r I ' " , ! ff*il l' ; 77.15e4 ., - •,. .•ret, , •t,,--..i•z-r:gt;:r;•••- ... _ . . — . . . ......_Note: - _ - - _- - C...J CU • :.._.. = CD. . "TI . t u- 4:11...:.\?;\ . _ - • a) . fa....._ _ , ,. ....... . . .... -- • . . . — .. : . . - . .--....:::....i.1 . - .. • •:- . _ ) , I• . . . • - - • -- - — - --• , -- • . r ! . • • . . - •- ---- • 1.;___L_.- I_ - = . .. •.. Please cut off and remail to the .---- —_ • , 1 RHSociety Historic Preservation Committee. ...... = Thanks! . 1 V I I. i \ t t 1 -- :=_ . . . . - - '. . :How -do you feel about this issue? 0 IP 0 GI . , 1= N . r 0 . , X i I am interested in preserving y .1 • _ Renton5 please_contact me! _ , . _ _ [ ] NOtIttetested. • _ -_ . x i•.) =-7o ... (D Lai En- (D M Ul ,,--t• [ ] Sign-- the up _for the committee:, .--.- ..- :- , r-r 0 t-r 0 —c 0 { ] Contact Information: - .. ,.- c * ›. -0 _ > < (-7, in 1) --' .....4 cr) ..._. _ -- -:1 F.- •r", PhOlasp. /,1 5 1.4,1,3--3-':- CO CD 's _ _ N, ..„%i•- _ C:) a, a) • .1. --Email: ----1:-..." -t - - ---- - cri in cr- ._ Note: _ _ ____ _ _ - - (......) a, CL (D -. ) - M (D ,•:' r.ii vi - - ... _ . • . —- t • ! _._ . •_____; I— — — _ Please cut off and remail to the • , / RHSociet-y Historic-Preservation Comm ittee. Thanks! 1. t ,. 13a, • Hwy . . - ... off^,: in c�o . V. How do you feel N • about: this Issue - i 1 s _ - a I. am interested in reservin . - 0 • Renton, please contact me!- xN270. ._._. . (D W N. [ ] Not Interested. . __ � _`� � [ ] Sign me up fort e committee. __ [ . ] •Contact •Information: • _ Si-''. ; • Phone: LP-s= �35 -2i/Lf3_.. _ o rt � o -o r cn ui o p. En_ s m e. Email. -- W = Note: :z� al11/41r.Lrt A Mattson _•` , 3815 NE-Ith SY.Apt.F21 U 1 _ u,Durt Renton,\1'.�98USG _._. - (D • - - . CL • s ,i•, ,� I .__ _ •7 F�: n � Please cut off and remail to the I. RHSociety Historic Preservation Committee:: Thanks!:--: -- . . '-7 .. . ( I - - . ,C T. . •' . • 0 . . - • : —•—••.=,—*i • • :----,-4-‹ •I • . . • • s‘'c..—,,;I ' c-..•• . t ..:----• I - - •-cl , . ' - - .....e. a-if? • How . *. %J.. = • i . ft, . • ..:-...; ,..< . do you feel , n____ ____ . 0 fp about this issue ( 0 •J -j ` I - .., . _ C4 _ C.J . , . I am interested in preserving 413. Renton, please contact me! -- X r•J = 70 [ ] Not Interested. -- • 0 t-t- = _ ... _ -..:- r-t• rt- - 0 Z --I 0 • M Sign me up for the comniiftee. II_---..._•, = i7 [ ] Contact Information: -- .._. --..-- l.0 C -3 F.s• ( j - •-13 -.4 — __ - • Phone: L as CU r') , 0 \•---- ..2.3 --• -;-C <.'•\.' Email: , -...„:„ ....,.-._„:: _ _ ..._ ......._.-..: 7_.--_- to i-t•--..... n. - --._ - 1-.- =." I— CD '-i 1 - --- ..--- • Note:- 1.4 17.- CD • I i { 1.1 • -- ..— = 71 CD 1 •. )CD N. : (4 . ...-= ---Ca. • ./ Ly ilicm 4 1 -- . 4th! • 7.... 1 I Please cut off and remail to the ._ RHSociety Historic Preservation Coinmittee: Thanks!- — \ . \ ,Tr- . .. • --,.. W . . CI) .. 1 • . . -D How do 'you. feel ._.__, • p ...... about this- issue? - . - Q, ...........„. . _ . . . . . .---. , _ . • • •. . . ... . 0 . P'l I am interested in preserving. e • 0 . ; Renton, please contact me! ... (D UJ (.7) (I) • [ ] Not Interested. _-- . t-1- - K] Sign me _up for the committee. ..„.., 1 0 '1,...k. V) •Di\) a [ I Contact Information: i,-,-,. --13 r --2. ..„........ :......._> .-7- ri con .,, :y.' • Phone: (*is-) • -- CO CD C, "., ,_, CO(-6_,% • as s -572-u) Email: ecittuvict--33o-rex,14-wiria. _ - CL Milli Note: • • (D . "71 r I.I I I_I I 64(1(ij t NitaA(LL(j ft q611,(A/Lt - CL • i I • ' • • • \ \ \ \ \ \ Please cut off and remail to the . , i , 111 ; RHSociety Historic Preservation Committee. Thanks! • . . _ to 1 71 to . n •1 ... mi. C7 v•-) -I Ot 1 , • P 4' 13 0 i ... La•-, SO ri I ' • si, a• -j 7q - .. • ci, > to 0 I • so ct. sm. t•I . . jg g How do- you reel .._ _. . about t • ._ , ..i. - _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ - • , • . _ . . .. ._ . ._ _ . Vi I am interested in preserving c., _ Renton, please contact me! Os -, • . [ _ ] Not Interested - . 20 NJ :c 70 = o UJ (.7)- (D [ ] Sign me up for the committee. • . VI t-t• M z... r•-r , 0 ,..,,-1* _.,,,,,. -z-- 0 _s. -1 %•-• .-_•__ [ ] Contact Information: rD in 0 5 S6-.1 :-.... Phones 4/gic —•,/,..9-6P---L..5"-, 0 3 - •,..._ ko c Fi• OD (D el 1:1) D U r Enl- all* bit s 0/9 e f-v-,:. I. A:;'f.1 C.i C—'014//Ci •%'s 1 C = 0 > 4..' • ' L.:.• N.j rt •---.. r). Note::.•,,,,c,,7 c < n -Z -4a-• .% .,f... = •• L:.•• ca.(D • • 7. .'%,. ' % : ".--..,.t..": ,. • • .-.: = -.:_. . r. ;,,,...?...:4-,•le-44 , ,....,,e.-1--c...x.,e. / . --.. ...z..,./,.......d--e...-zei-arz_______....-,.... 1 . \ P ease cut off and remail to the.ill RHSociety Historic Preservation CoMmittee. Than ks! r-3--- , . . •. . . . •- .. - - - - . - - . . • . . • - . _ How do you- feel about this 1 S sue? . _ . .• . _. .. . . _ . . . ...• • , . , . . . - . . . •_ _ .. .. . .. • . • .. - . . . - . - • - • - • pi I am interested in preserving • • - Renton; please contact me!,---- _ x 1•.) = 7a- - - [ ] Not Interested. _ . _ _ I 5,- z . Er - • [A. Sign me utLyllecs11- iter . - . _: n• = xje. Ay;c4f A >a < (7) L11 • [ ] Co act frif6frilation: - , •• 00 w,.. c, 2 • Phone: 77- 7y-•,,P ,• u., 0 0 ,..,,v) Email: . ' L.k.) `Z SI • Note: • Lei CI. . ,‘. ,,,C, 4,./_...6_,' /.--- , . • CD 'TI • CD CD t6 e,e4e1C-- /7 V:27 .0-t- ---;- 2"g 0:13 FD- : • -0 = n, CD ,g, z, j r-r••••• ' . W /...TVFC' /4C)t-l- 0511--OSe . • Please cut off and remail to the; . • • RHSociety Historic Preservation.Comrruitee. Thanks! • feel How do ou . CP about _thls_.:.lssue I am:=interested. in _reservin Renton- please::contact me!. _ . N = = • [ Not Interested:` .......▪_ . 0 3 -�. o N. -Sign me up forte. committee. › - N I 7Sf1 ' D < a [ ] Contact Information: -▪' .: . O T 00 w GGk J _C o o' r66 :.. .. . • . -4-a 5-) a7! --1 -773 C 11 rr vs Email: a+, o r '" o b . barmL2 4 h�a vs;.c'o r 1 N � n W Q• Note: ba r uaii. g 'ha d_i o n . cam Ch r `"' a 1111 ._. (D , _.0 � _... ... . • ..coo , ....... ...__. • sr,' r • . Please cut off and remail to the ..:, RHSocie Historic Preservation Committee::Thanks! uHow do ou feel y . oz • _ ... afs$uIëT_.. . . . . • .. . . . i , - _ ..... ........„._ .. _.;„_. . . .._. ._....:. :._...: ...... .• ........ ... ... ,....,. ,.... ._ : ....... . ...- .-__....,- . --_, . . v: -..:_......,_.„..,-____.--......., -...,. -... _,. .. ,.. ...__::..., .._ , .. • . _ „ 4 4 I-.am interested;in preserving . . . Ren ton pleasecontact:me! : _ x N = 7a- - " _ . [ . ] Not..Interested.- -=----- - . jSignmeipfortliecommittee• • _ > 3 D < �k- '� [ .] Contact Information: _ �p r* `S I _ = CD CO (Dz rl, : Phone: q?- s AA6 go 0 ::� c = o Email: _ ._ = w n .. Note: . -� ;� ►1 ! Prlp� & Jq ///ed Cyr/ n fD n. s i i� aKa ��� - . . _ . i I-1-( 1 - 1 . • . _ __._ _ _. -_ _ . . .-- I Please cut off and remail to the- . .— RHSociety Historic Preservation.Committee::Thanks. .. . . .--- - --: .------..1 .'.1 11 - .- . - do -�How = ou .. feel. w,..., . • .r� .., about t is issue _. . , . ____ _.. __ ___ _. _. I---- f - :---._ _ ..-. I r .- - - _ _ .. - - e...1 --.. :. --.::-- -. -I am interested° in preserving. • • - : .Renton, please contact me!`= . 70.W = [ ] Not Interested. . • 3 ] Sign me up for the committee::' = n D _ 3 5� ] Contact Information: m Phone: 1-125r—O 703 - ui O O (n T96•• -/ o rt` o , Email.$) RO(R- -wo I /,, ..- ;: w `° 1� J��' >'eec t►) Teo z�0�/. W Note: (,c�,r 1�-c� d- 42Ne..y co fez sC.l\oo2- 6', toh,f_7— c.06-06.0 Be -Ti � h, Tpa.ic: , s70v9,3 TqwI� � T�'J S'►`?3�R CD '��� --P..' - fie - - .� ,L1 oar r-v iC SettTower f� S eo r� o 'er . Please cut off and remail to the• . i . . 1 Society Hist ric Preservation Committee:Thanks! - .� \ \ \ O y z3—r,J&/ moo._.. • `•‘�L E ^ . ""-- Renton Historical Society & The City Of Renton, R oTc 4 F-61.-. �; - -""^-- This card is designed to register your concerns to the °' '!AY ?' -- - Renton Historical Society and City Of Renton, regarding the • &'/9 ' -0 C.\ - . :: - preservation of Lande Feed. ' fti Lande Feed has served the citizens of this community for over 76 years. It would be an asset to the community of Renton to see Lande Feed preserved for it's historical value. fi You may add my name to any mailing list for the purpose • Renton Historical Society of supporting Lande Feed. Attn-: Barbara Horton - - - VJ t am 18 years of age or older ❑ I am under the age of 18 235 Mill Ave. S. , Renton, WA 98057 Signed. 4 L c./ q' email Address: 04 1 c� I UL 5-„ 757/- • e� Il�li�lirl�Il,iiiI,i,iiii,til,lii,iiiiiiiiilliiilli.I.I. lli,l �e�.--iol, J44 `V/,Rd�'6 phone /,I-Z5-�55=/a 7'9- At/ ^.0 t_E 6:, k// PM (LI ";„"_ Renton Historical Society & The City Of Renton, MAY —� ,"�_a��"Ti atirt _ '• This card is designed to register your concerns to the Renton Historical Society and City Of Renton, regarding the , ‘•_e<04/-0___ r--/4 .17k/ i �' '•-� • preservation of Lande Feed. • X Lande Feed has served the citizens of this community for over 76 years. It would be an asset to the community of Renton to see Lande Feed preserved for it's historical value. 19 You may add my name to any mailing list for the purpose Renton Historical Society of supporting Lande lied. Attn: Barbara Horton kI I am 18 years of age or older ❑ I am under the age of 18 235 Mill Ave. S. Renton, WA 98057 Signed: /�Jt/z.ca--�� email a Address: 7 r5 ' l3 t 11:1,.1:,1:11,-1:1.1:,:1:,,111 - -' - .---2,,:7-7/ ill„ 997'7,P --,---- - ci-r_- 1��- Q/„ � • Renton Historical Society & The City Of Renton, N ,.--a"^',. =w PHy j,, This card is designed to register your concerns to the 1. Renton Historical Society and City Of Renton, regarding the n I r` - preservation of Lande Feed. 2, ^� Lande Feed has served the citizens of this community for - over 76 years. It would be an asset to the community of Renton to see Lande Feed preserved for it's historical value. Renton Historical Society You may add my name to any mailing list for the purpose supporting Lande Feed. Attn: Barbara Horton fn 235 Mill Ave. S. PfI am 18 years of age or older ❑ I am under the age of 18 Renton, WA 98057 KC/ /TC Signed:%4A) /t-//4/ -% email , Address: :3`/-.)S J //. yC- /)/. i/Lc, L•�%� %J'/7;Yphone �� '7�C% % IIIh IllI1fl1111i1IiI111i,1ilil j 1111(1111111111(1111111f11111111111111I III 11 Renton Historical Society & The City Of Renton, `�� �_ � /11.61 This card is designed to register your concerns to the 2- /g �g- /-2--7 ST �--- Renton Historical Society and City Of Renton, regarding the '"'-'"-------- = �ZEti7/mil/ �'�O� , ? �� . L.- ._��— �_ preservation of Lande Feed. -�hv` • 13 Lande Feed has served the citizens of this community for over 76 years. It would be an asset to the community of • Renton to see Lande Feed preserved for it's historical value. l'sYou may add my name to any mailing list for the purpose of supporting Lande Feed. Renton Historical Society Attn:.B arbara Horton dam 18 years of age or older ❑I am under the age of 18 235 Mill Ave. S. Signed: %-� ���c� � � email Renton, WA 98057 Address: -O/8 j/ E /y � sT n - 11 ! 1 1 11 ! I ! ! it 11 II II II 11 i! 1 tom-I-= ;.. :. _...� 171_,Is t,att re Renton Historical Society & The City Of Renton, 785 S 3 43 o - i ► • � +ram This card is designed to register your concerns to the opt- ¢- &J I,- � _ _�� ___ Renton Historical Society and City Of Renton,.regarding the preservation of Lande Feed. t✓J Lande Feed has served the citizens of this community for over 76 years. It would be an asset to the community of Renton to see Lande Feed preserved for it's historical value. pi You may add my.name to any mailing list for the purpose Renton Historical Society of supporting Lande Feed. Attn_: Barbara Horton 235 Mill Ave. S. l I am 18,years of age or older ❑ lam under the age of 18 • Renton, WA 98057 Signed: /� £%lJ'] .0 email Address: 7 5 S S /30 saos iz a/ IItLlIi+IiUi++iIif+llilit: q���.7 A._ Uj//i '/7? phone.:2 7 6� 7 01-7/ iJ+ - � "Fr i t yr •••,. s,M's!'1:',4 'u'i•tij =�i ,-g.: :TinaR.51.Cyr-Miller j� Renton Historical Society & The City Of Renton, `t; ; :r .14008 Se.156th Ct. "�: 07� "�i �. rr'y�. Renton,WA c9„8058 _, �.; - This card is designed to register your concerns to the , _•.� ...;6*-••:,�, ;+ Renton Historical Society and City Of Renton, regarding the y:` .''' preservation of Lande Feed. • • IX Lande Feed has served the citizens of this community for over 76 years.It would be an asset to the community of • Renton to see Lande Feed preserved for it's historical value. Renton Historical Society Attn: Barbara Horton `1 Y‘o ay ddm a r-the-purpose of s rti Land eed. �� 14) 1..IS-�S 235 Mill Ave. S. Renton, WA 98057 — I am 18 years of age or older ❑ I am under the age of 18 _. i c, • - Signed: , 4 ail des Q f S %I :(11 �` 1 �----w Renton Historical Society & The City Of Renton, BuyVe Book �1 F NI _.— --� fir. - — ' • This card is designed to register your concerns to the • 327 Williams Ave. l Z a �'� Renton Historical Societyand CityOf Renton,regarding the Rattan,'WA98055 . a, :4AY......) ��- _' g g ��:1C\ __ ___.t .. 1.- preservation of Lande Feed. ti Lande Feed has served the citizens of this community for sa over 76 years. It would be an asset to the community of Renton to see Lande Feed preserved for it's historical value. J 3� You may add my name to any mailing list for the purpose of supporting Lande Feed. Renton Historical Society '\) Attn: Barbara Horton / E I am 18 years of age or older ❑ I am under the age of 18 235 Mill Ave. S. Renton, WA 98057 q I Signe 4e`---71l (J e(4 -0 ,�_ email J Address:. Buy The Book ~ 327 Williams.ve.So. / II,I„I„I,il,,,,i,I„I.I„,I,I,,,II„II,,,II,�,II„I,I„II„I Renton,'WA98055 hone ' S�, -�7l/ ,_.ALE !, , ��...._ • E _ i ,� Renton Historical Society & The City Of Renton, :�� ;a�.c _ _ This card is designed to register your concerns to the C\ --� • — Renton Historical Society and City Of Renton, regarding the - :JY.'r _ — preservation of..Lande Feed. . . . ; Znde Feed has served the citizens of this community for over 76 years. It would be an asset to the community of Renton to see Lande Feed preserved for it's historical value. E ou may add my name to any mailing list for the purpose • Renton Historical Society of supporting Lande Feed. Attn: Barbara Horton Zam 18 years of age or older ❑ I am under the age of 18 235 Mill Ave. S. Renton, WA 98057 Signed: C4_4',L 44.9 email _ . Address: p O.iox /t/"?,S • l`'/ 0nlf i./; I/,-':/ nI,nnr U/c--/t,? --- e7i/ t L F ->•... , • . ., q- Renton Historical Society & The City Of Renton, .** TCn ** �� This card is designed to register your concerns to the c 1f Ms. Kathie M.Zetterberg -• .t•••• +* * . - Renton Historical Societyand CityOf Renton, regarding the '' 755 S 21st St. g . g Renton,WA 980�5 preservation of Lande Feed. II Lande Feed has served the citizens of this community for ____ . - over 76 years. It would be an asset to the community of Renton to see Lande Feed preserved for it's historical value. You may add my name to any mailing list for the purpose of supporting Lande Feed. Renton Historical Society Attn: Barbara Horton slam 18 years of age or older ❑ I am under the age of 18 . 235 Mill Ave. S. . Renton, WA 98057 Signed: email kZctlGrbCC°uSrxS7nc • Address: 75-S*" 5 . oZl s7` s-t• 1'C e tfoi,, will gBos - phone I.2 - ,l.4 -33?0 ci-(�ev+�I sa�i',n r C\ E a; _ "-_-�-�.- ' ' -- Renton Historical Society & The City Of Renton, c /il L-. ---� -- This card is designed to register your concerns to the A '� '`'`" '!.`:fie ' Renton Historical Society and City Of Renton, regarding the ��9 '��� ' `• preservation of Lande Feed. V] Lande Feed has served the citizens of this community for over 76 years. It would be an asset to the community of Renton to see Lande Feed preserved for it's historical value. Renton Historical Society \,121 You may add my name to any mailing list for the purpose Attn: Barbara Horton of supporting Lande Feed. 235 Mill Ave. S. Renton, WA 98057 VtJ I am 18 years of age or older ❑ I am under the age of 18 - Signed:- - s email SrlQ►,h i 11 'p. y Q cwQ3'r-.4c - Address: WO lot A. Oes I Eb'S . . .. , . . 1 I I 1 r I I I I I I It rt rt It I I II I cr` ^N4'/.7 9 6ll 5- ..t /'•.-C1--tz---ZNI -----"'--- 7-4 p _ Renton Historical Society-&The City Of Rent ; -- --, _--_. This card is designed to register your concerns to the Renton Historical Society and City Of Renton,regarding the _ preservation of Lande Feed. ALande Feed has served the citizens of this community for o r 76 years. It would be an asset to the community of Renton to see Lande Feed preserved for it's historical value. Renton Historical Society You may add my name to any mailing list for the purpose Attn: Barbara Horton of supporting Lande Feed. •— 235 Mill'Ave. S. 4 Renton, WA 98057 am 18 years of age or older ❑ I am under the age of 18 /.--1 //-/-JE2 A-' /,' (2-- Signed/00 4A) A//c)SC'//A/C,C' email/`//e;)oS('/%,C cll`( Address: �C4/ S. 2C%:_ A) 37 ifil ,l,iLil,tt;I,I:,Iilmisl,rillull,,,ll,iflliail id —5 �—T�`c, L.c - phone ,� /CP �G6- --_--- _____ ei ' .... • 6626 $,�s �� S� ,�1 _ Renton Historical Society & The City Of Renton, ( pn�� (,� 7S ----- "�='opri&� This card is designed to register your concerns to the r r. r - W.: Renton Historical Society and City Of Renton, regarding the 3' — It: ' - . preservation of Lande Feed. Lande Feed has served the citizens of this community for over 76 years. It would be an asset to the community of Renton to see Lande Feed preserved for it's historical value. Renton Historical Society You may add my name to any mailing list for the purpose Attn: Barbara Horton of supporting Lande Feed. 235 Mill Ave. S. Renton, WA 98057 I am 18 years of age or older ❑ I am under the age of 18 Signed: S-74. c�/\/\ cjLO,v—email ,lP(<4eir� Address: /g-35 71 ,20 i 1 I t I t t t I f , I , , ,t .. ,, ., . , .. �7 .>-� f i .. \ _ __ , .I--r.i • J.Mixa : • .per 4 4011 S.175th St. .. . �-�1 �.. ,_ Renton Historical Society & The City Of Renton, • Seatac.WA 93133-3630 i:' , �� Q1"'N1 •� 'g. • c.1 M 4 ..ram 1) "' t. � ;• .�—� This card is designed to register your concerns to the • �r r,9 mi.: • _r� at Renton Historical Society and City Of Renton, regarding the c i'0\ ,•-- n•.Y._. . preservation of Lande Feed. Lande Feed has served the citizens of this community for over 76 years. It would be an asset to the community of Renton to see Lande Feed preserved for it's historical value. Renton Historical Society 0 You may add my name to any mailing list for the purpose • Attn: Barbara Horton of supporting Lande Feed. 235 Mill Ave. S. Renton, WA 98057 - I am 18 years of age or older ❑ I am under the age of 18 • Signed: �'Y=� c � ��� email - Address:" JC// •5, /`y_S 2s/. •:-::::::_;...,, ,,,:-... 1 : : : :: ;: • ;s • ti\U� (,L-0 MI . phone t /,/�� �( �,. __ Renton Renton Historical Society & The City Of Renton, ` t f !Q on, rL/. 6/i1/y .. •Q`1��5 1` ,��• � _-------�•-, „i y��. .. This card is designed to register your concerns to the , �� f. '- '. ': ' M Renton Historical Society and City Of Renton,regarding the � `. preservation of Lande Feed. :-•. frLande Feed has served the citizens of this community for over 76 years.It would be an asset to the community of Renton to see Lande Feed preserved for it's historical value. Renton Historical Society , You may add my name to any mailing list for the purpose Attn: Barbara Horton of supporting Lande Feed. 235 Mill Ave. S. . Renton, WA 98057 LcI am 18 years of age or older 0 I am under the age of 18 Signed:0,/i Dim Yx:4_M'i/.r,7t email L � �+ Address: -- S Burp P �`l1 e,Jo,. IllitiliIIIIlII,II,lIIIIl„�I,I,„fl(III:,,II„,II„I,II ll,,i 1:11 n� I fi/71 !(l�s- niinnr, /PIA/- -,1/.-/�� ttt� ` - `-- Renton Historical Society & The City Of Renton, .. Mc. Jason Livinystor "l PI1 �' 4011 S. 175th SC. -� r ����� �os "� - e Seatic, WA 93128-36 '-• �'��'~• .. ----- 011 _ ._.. This card is designed to register your concerns to the �• � - : '":•`11C. : Renton Historical Society and City Of Renton,regarding the preservation of Lande Feed. Lande Feed has served the citizens of this community for over 76 years. It would be an asset to the community of Renton to see Lande Feed preserved for it's historical value. Renton Historical Society You may add my name to any mailing list for the purpose Attn: Barbara Horton of supporting Lande Feed. 235 Mill Ave. S. • Renton, WA 98057 I am 18 years of age or older ❑ I am under the age of 18 Signed: r%A1 4-61".(1/ - email Address:110 1! t i ", a? Iltlttittltllllttltl,tllltttlll,ttllttlltlllimilItlilial,tl � .CtiCk-C- Lan C 1 i 14one . Mill r 1 4317 1951'1arge nSE 1Gr rc �: Renton Historical Society &--The City Of Renton, Renton,WA 93053 r - t `` O . ' •,'. ) . f.:....... - •:-.� T This card is designed to register your concerns to the Renton Historical Society and City Of Renton,regarding the preservation of Lande Feed. 6 Lande Feed has served the citizens of this community for over 76 years.It would be an asset to the community of Renton to see Lande Feed preserved for it's historical value. Renton Historical Society etcYou may add my name to any mailing list for the purpose Attn: Barbara Horton of supporting Lande Feed. 235 Mill Ave. S. , Renton, WA 98057 glam 18 years of age or older ❑ I am under the age of 18 • Signed: 27 7C/ `I afol. (�mail Address: /1 t//7 - /95- �7j. I 8 7 II.I..I..I.II....I.I..I I 1 I II II it it 1 t It I G• 7` • // //) + %�—) 17�i� Renton Historical Society & The City Of Renton, - - • LE This card is designed to register your concerns to the (..V ;14-n I' Z �-•-- Renton Historical Society and City Of Renton,regarding the ,- ,`,AY __-- preservation of Lande Feed. '� • _ ande Feed has served the citizens of this community for over 76 years. It would be an asset to the community of Renton to see Lande Feed preserved for it's historical value. • Renton Historical Society ❑You may add my name to any mailing list for the purpose Attn: Barbara Horton of supporting Lande Feed. 235 Mill Ave. S. Pram 18 years of age or older ❑ I am under the age of 18 Renton, WA 98057 Signed: email Address: i 1'• �� ) ›i fC�-D-W f 60400,, OA• ?,405-6 phone II,IItII,IIIII,,lIIII,1.1„IIuII,II1IllII,,II,,,1I„I,1IIII,,I Renton Historical Society & The City Of Renton, C`ORGF PINYUH - .. ;, �;,, �4�05 SE 213th St , `; __- This card is designed to register your concerns to the 98p4�-312� J _ Kent WA . Renton Historical Society and City Of Renton, regarding the preservation of Lande Feed. ^/ E"Lande Feed has served the citizens of this community for over 76 years.It would be an asset to the community of Renton to see Lande Feed preserved for it's historical value. Renton Historical Society ❑ You may add my name to any mailing list for the purpose Attn: Barbara Horton of supporting Lande Feed. 235 Mill Ave. S. l?I am 18 ; or of ❑ I am under the age of 18 Renton, WA 98057 Signed: &eo.,z, e P/Ny eti t( email Address: i Y 2-v 5 S Z l 3 cC-I- - - — - - 7 1 L. / 7 - II.I..I.-I.II--_I-I_ I I I I II II II II I I II I Renton Historical Society & The City Of Renton, ".. L E ii, _ - • This card is designed to register your concerns to the �'` P M �`' �- •; +.: -- Renton Historical Society and City Of Renton,regarding the 19 ,,a, ---w — 1'y''. '16! -- preservation of Lande Feed. 0�� —_ i '� - TAI Lande Feed has served the citizens of this community for over 76 years. It would be an asset to the community of - Renton to see Lande Feed preserved for it's historical value. You may add my name to any mailing list for the purpose Renton Historical Society -o supporting Lande Feed. Attn: Barbara Horton 235 Mill Ave. S. I I am 18 years of age or older ❑ I am under the age of 18 Renton, WA 98057 Signed: / J v/4'Sr//A'/C emailSL�/J 6/(--/,(4&SE'ri, C(-'/ Address: ,-3(.4/2 ..S. C �.)3 rTh / ; ) /A.J- Jc c / i T/Lf/ C %�. :� / :.9C(r phonef 1I,{t,1"hilunitl,1n,ln,li1 (,.,lul,I.u,li.nI..liill mil'iii lii.iliiiiif Renton Historical Society & The City Of Renton, i, . - — _ — ,,• MR. FREDERICK P. RIVE F r This card is designed to register your concerns to the `.�;:., MS SUZANNE RASMUSSEN D w Renton Historical Societyand CityOf Renton,regarding the SEATTLE4532 T, WA 98118-140 `Y ' g g r _. ik preservation of Lande Feed. . - Lande Feed has served the citizens of this community for • over 76 years. It would be an asset to the community of Renton to see Lande Feed preserved for it's historical value. ❑ You may add my name to any mailing list for the purpose Renton Historical Society of supporting Lande Feed. Attn: Barbara Horton 235 Mill Ave. S. I am 18 years of age or older 0 I am under the age of 18 Renton, WA 98057 Signed: 6email P-P 0.101/0_ 0 4 b' � �U. EST 1 N cr' Address: 4J 3 L- / Q _., _____ ._ 111 r Cr lig. I101 . /1/1/ in7?(J. j' ��I-E . �'-`'"� �— Renton Historical Society & The City Of Renton, — i o MR. FREDERICK P. RIVE NOv .— g41109(..1 —'-- MS SUZANNE RASMUSSEN a •- ; .. 4532 46TH AVE S 00 ii ,-.7 This card is designed to register your concerns to the SEATTLE, WA 9811e-140 Renton Historical Society and City Of Renton,regarding the / preservation of Lande Feed. • X Lande Feed has served the citizens of this community for over 76 years. It would be an asset to the community of Renton to see Lande Feed preserved for it's historical value. Renton Historical Society You may add my name to any mailing list for the purpose Attn: Barbara Horton of supporting Lande Feed. 235 Mill'Ave. S. _ Renton WA 98057 ❑ I am 18 years of age or older ❑ I am under the age of 18 Si n t• email Addr : b." • AG /hj(--,5 • a-r II,I„I„I.II,,,,I,I..I,I.,,I,I,..II..II.,,il.„II„I,I„II,.I F kTTI c Sl1e)-1401 phone a0G--1a3-o1?30(c.7 • Cuµu 6r --Pi sRc6P6cr; PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE NAME ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL ei E/3)42s,Ar. )-DPIW? 2 ';‘,/(14_ 44irdeki z.6 / 3/ 5-t4 24-7/-zr?-7 311/40s-rs-7-1 i w ,vim ‘ ;z5 . - t 2 2 447Q7 16 4 ( /6. s�� Q� �/M %PPS 7 5 .� �� 46-1' gam ,. 6 e 1 7d-K- 45-r - ‘J4 rr6-7 7541,*/1././avAi27' Vif 05+ rArt4e„.(Q. t cVA- qgb3 85„<...il_d �� .PmB 035- LI SE PQ W4 q�bS-1 \ 9 1. ;41- CO I L, 5a 9613 60'W - 50 `7 / 7 10 -1 aU5 $DT b ti 5' t'� c H-rA) (,JA B . I y-C?irl 13aORttUc NQ , PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY . HISTORIC STRUCTURE NAME ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL Pb ' '67\'n A 1 C- `1,,AQ. ,I hikkni , \cCINT nl lk � �- iv�l, r i ,f- pj s, 2 A47 %Pr./ eih,,s wg ro 5-1r ;z.r-2 r t- s f?c 3 . 4/1)4 4C=4&e `/�8 �iVoQ (G9 9áI7b' 2c 76d-95,2 441e1/4-&-d /-- e../ r ST .c54.5 /l' 6-) 6,-.7 5 OW V 440t1 /1/1-)4c-tf /S'FF./- 64,re /11. c A-/- L-f.- R7Azi-e-r„, e/,,2X-2.)---r-ci/Y 6 u, A-C�f SG,� 1 cco7 s.C-- L/Ck kitA i 4? -23 S-0E' s- • 7 4L_ l S 767 6 8 `\ hY, �D ET '-1 L./ ftti-e S Se �� ci&-1 Cg 7-2-3-7/Ljc 9 q-.6---igumilioa cybg 4/E-7pr3-/ ,givi-.3 7gol_cfi Gf 10 xr,e. ei _47,ee,T5L-_,4ze:4 YG/7 AL/5. 27z/ -17 - ,e-/P/D4/ • • PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE NAME ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL Scat- cc.U6 06 9�9.? 7� 1 r t--) 5-04:4 17a( 7 3 Y E Ys. �o 3l-erg is)%-� /6 0S' //'"A''s C-f Sc /� 1— �r- rs 3 tc"( L,,a-,,,.e),,,-- s O J `f fj ! r 2-0 G"7 2_3-29 i C a l r 1 D 17 g h) S<C(ff(-C f� CL ,(o; 4 ario4g/1rnu1v- 6733 �3 �'rc q$//7 GC li /z _3 ys s6 r/cra Las/ /( N 5 !, / I 4✓4-EI T / .[J V v) /6^�r/�( �'✓!N �/✓/V t S�1 codhra„-sharry 6 6 Coc �.}rl 1 r a.� lt).iu4- -fh,IQ2.vi 3 rSE 4Z5-22.6 4 retrywK . 0.) 7 4 � C1 I LeOW ��� i D ztO z71-177 8 t b y Cep �1'� 23 �s�% �/� fj e �1�er)(, 9 nik- ke 7Sc.) S . loin E-. S-4 . Zc)c.-2ZS 07 10 �;�i� lJ` ,��L-� /6 3 / / a o PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE NAME ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL 1 l()IA.),, yrcc&,t�� U l 2 /lancti L0ii I 1 p7-,),a6 '6 Pt s qzs-zry-r it hi5j,,,ne,docjsi-� 3 ici le Cod Kt.; el 1G3Z1 sr 13zddsa- 4 'Lor WA 2Z.6 -7Soff ��fic'�Sez7v`,��1�i►� � o 4 V /"- ,46(2)c 5 ( Y. . / g-,?oy 6 /20 &))< ec/5/2 9-4 te, , 2o61.,7 .gz j vv 7 t ){ 454,0 . 2_0 a 5 . 1 y711 1/W(e 042.4.ez 92s Y:sz 39b9 8R/7/4. Se LIbiti kx,°GC 4f f�C6I rf-v 1.r 9 / r - /// , 36 Z-i 3-r Alef 78, s� 10_D _ � � C� ,� w E t,)-A 9 OS S } 7 PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE NAME ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL /J2rr'/.44/2--/ �as���l� s� 9.8 2 3. ^/'3 �/� rl 3q /C/ 5 4 (\Mkt-4\A 1 0 ue R 11 5 S\,r1C.Qtf lc� -Ulo r coil? 6 0 61\,<., \..!c Svti. OCR 50 -h-. ((, 14 P(c-c_(___ 1 7 r� 7 6-2:;a-,,J ?27.S gc5 /Je-ar., • c?,0,(F. - 10 �1 c3�� ��Lk __ 2 o PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY . HISTORIC STRUCTURE NAME ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL i8I 74S 1 j,QI rx ntscelI /'‘175 1 cr, 42:5-- /15 c' 2 ZA/Je _ �'���se( clgos 6 3 ITIael eu. -.d 3 3Z C'I41/14,9S utm 47 S /z , [ / i . , 4(4*d (Iic.SS eI / " cit aSS 14 Gvr r' ( r e r ) 4 I Pec r k Rue )16 2.._&144 -, /4 s-- z0 lz) > < 6 okki.Px\.o_ \ok-u-4ar- > r e� lSoSL 7 nil nLl;Q 1\\(1. f1 l`J ± Ro gd-I: 27 p 6 2 W 8 nr ,i,f ' rvo c A. c- 14 L51 \ O to q 7o. o•44v3 54 9 \cW eu/q /a ccr-kS ke g g tikes 1 Z Z 10 -kr 5 i o i l 63t-7 S 13 2.` ) Peri 1vct, . m ' ' PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE NAME ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL 1 Dv (9 VAL\ Cil,, A S� 15- L3 2 /karuft eit 2-ar,-7x 4nci 4fig-,-1.6 /Kg/Li—u/"1-1) 3 eN P 4 '14' bno-y) I cy- 7 / /5-7 7 f-� 4 1 /c, �ll� r�� -7i/s- Sri , 1 Oil �����_ `l?5 s?' 5 00/1/1-____ STY fee uI S . C �� I L 2g c>,A,( p r r 6 P. () • _I LI N1 j / • 7 ..GP-F___G-.-Sthtla-R, /6KcS W3g6R-_- eEtf7DA/1 8 .) ,,,c1./-43,t Pa 9 P-P--4 7a1/6-4 9 /(g/k/ aro' /S3'471,41-4/5 ( X25(0/i/i/V4 Wa3V i.() froocz . ):\A-- . 0 '(). J/ bpi) 9T065- PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE. IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE NAME ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL i47S LQ2 9 s�^ /544u s , /e&p7-674) , zsg,r5EArdriLile )11sPeDie 3 /eitio N ARec( �2�-� r7 - PAymoivi _�(W1e 16/4- f Ne- 4 q 57z Sin�'i/ f�U� • Rer►.�tr�n toc,, 5's- 5 7;yz,/z,2 //7e4.44.)fr/Ral r_r_ss- ,;=J9 flepz 6414-Cit 144R121, e Lf Z 1 AT .S 7 -1)1,1-A•ut4 -Kt,.. 22 47h- 1-12c- 2 z 5- 70K 0 Qr amsc 9 GoLr M , S4.Ck 500 uwioN A-Ve NI Berl-oh WA '1 K'o59 -�riner en+ �c �F Lc� ac L.JTAiie e // T�45oT Z ,L5 ireis/Tr✓ '4, 96l S7 3!2'6-(-7riAro,Jk !rr��l a P _ PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STRUC THE TURE. PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC NAME ADDRESS PHONE EMAIL I E ti3 cz5c6 . Lz5 15(43 S.E .&I-DES V.b . �2(0-S. 5 I 2 r .. - - (63__D �3i5 S.C. €. RA,. � _.( ,-53st Dawn 9 cosq 4-a S 3 !, ( Zf ,ce, `42 S t (?SS- 4 3 RepT.c'L (tgosc eta-- S 4. al ova tDr . 162�csk� 14, t,?)c --- a S - 4-ce. 4 5. 2t /V.//7- 5, g, / //-)02' V2 }1.t_49 /— /--3 ___,)_ . / .) j /2.2/ - 5 ,.E,/ ../..s/f , a,?6--" — 6. PV__04411.4\) (i`a --"I" ei 0;8 0? 7/- ?/3 5 � � L, „9.0. f1P (rf - q,�lf1,� ^ ?- "�Ic ;- r 7. �ti1 z poi, s, 00,..,(6,..c .,..--fr: ei.,608. s--. F.e.3,------( st% 2-0 c• 7 iS -SO 73 1/ICK C___ ___c_ic(v/ ; 15., SC- A cirrug 0 i/).5-4.--p--)- 5 /41&iicyl 0-)ic7,T-0Te- 8. -\jly L, PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY • HISTORIC STRUCTURE NAME ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL 1 r(DO;d'VfiC‘ 2 *-a#0 / - � Yy�s� �s_ ,s 3 S\4.\.ax___(5 N cbj��ANRA \0\0`3\0 \\c,\n sk sz% o;•U e 4 (Yi iGA-[`f' 6-• 4i .✓A✓ 1 OISI I)- 4-o& S ke„1- d n 6 glei l , g2P \e-Ao SE Ni Qa� e, Z-r( 6(f j I 7 ArAeid /la d: :•676 , 5 c (0S_- - /gm41 1/2s 2SS • f Z 8 `. L a.Or�it 1 0 F) f.S6141X4 51 , 25-cPs3- 7 9� 9 -E�/k c dr�r zaz y- s.L./9 /en fo.r 10 -7?'1 I 1��' �}- S4,1 � \NA- i1 Z >-ZZ Ff i/ PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE NAME ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL lbw c! l l ,v c (cki 3g�E N 5 ~ / (if, -Yai=�D,6-0 yi3 2 f • /„o�., ✓ ' 3 5hj(Z$4 P.4AgJe �tofi t,l•cc. 4 4 . g3325. 64 06ck- Gj3 -c -a2898 ( 9oL,Cc 5 14-631 14S /7L-- 4zs- 226-Zg� 6 � (57CG 11C r .4ve S -6. z `zzC,sn2ett a5-agS 40Sajwite/2_ Y22c /eaqrs Re/t/72)Al ko07 4.,nd /-x7Li5 5E 1 6,_g4 9FA ig 10 b /1 4,cs 5 1c,6+t, Ren-to ECGsus PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE NIINIE ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL (1W ' ZE ,, /-k.446`e(3.0/0/4 YaL) s-22-6 9 Ste' 2 /egf �// /14 -a'-- ��3 A' 15 Tc1-- / - 22F-64735— , ig 0 1 0 f/J,7k_p_ -u-3- g-s7-g s 9‘oe--- .3� �� 5E Rz,i I04- _ —„qa7-6 3 a C� i - 15ia v5�3 44 5-� 7/ -g- /V 4 1 e r'7 IN4- �fDS 50,4e-41) f., ip/f- q e( 7", --°C- 772"- 6 RDLeit \,L) .( � -'-er y �� ti--v .23-- -7-;o r7� ��� I l . � . a t 7 \) ck- r1 cy L P( 0,+-cr- L1 l4 Pell/ Ave, 0< lar- a7 7/ 60 8 �� ( � ► z �-��.Sic W��ab�s�J 9 e 4 ,496. 9Ms-6 10 . ets-.1., / �c53 r. l q-'49- ,SUE L.7977, --7. „ > r - PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE. NAME ADDRESS PHONE EMAIL 1. '`,�t41 i n I11 Baa wand C Se (ta,)46s- 71-13a ;In 1- 9g134 e hb+friw-/ e 2. R1fiI Or blot' (4,0 / 0 -4n i p t 3. ).rolilr2 - (, 17 S. 3rd S+ (4(2 7Z5 I/O iCWtea inprru c 4. /e/),4 / io G/7 .S_ 3r� %. (s/.472g-,29/o 5. 7 %&-/'1�1 A d' L• /a,C e- /ADZ/ JS�Z /�/ ZS=Z7/•3�'/,1 6. Log. S. 01/4A.44 n a vi•-1 Av<_sz rn u-A9- c'?€ 4R-3,/50,56"5 7. v 011/ ✓ V1 1(tkI 22( S 6Y i �J AHrc, iQt'thh (9g // 8.. 'I? 4:3 ra't ‘ 1 zVti- 9 111 a) /A 5 rt ( I/1 C d 2 C// 10. L ISa- 300 1 ( l3+vL (-f ZS 35.59GS� _ c 1 - PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE NAME ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL 2/0/ s- / � �� W, C6/1 /rnglek /06E56,0 -6/)/hv� q6U ZCe (006 SAD 2 253 ' I la +� 4c, 2 L a -Y�-. -H 0:k c�G-- — e n�z�, - 1 Al ►4 R, Eok L./c� 3 io �1 .� � N�oN ( 4A 9e0c--7- 4 k' - J W,t 9go3-7 7-7 � �� 5 � . . 5 �'n q�n �S7, a 37 S-794 ( ? PIei e Ave Sc� RcL 'Jpeddvi ae(-11-0t4 `qG`' (-V s-27?- oggr- 7 : Goa )(1 /(3//c sfO ,ifik sEA -T AC 8 7641 1881/-.3.3 79U.0 S LdiISH 206 agi 90ircr g)7 -kgg . 10 0 (!\ „ti,,a d 1 1 O 1 ,,, �7 PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE. NAME ADDRESS PHONE EMAIL 1. 14-e04-hw 5 ts-6 S� 2. 1-cytA 1&.35 Pa $ay )3a(0 7724337 . m).esSJ 3. 4 - l z .671 ,£0 g(zco 772 7 efiv. 4. &WA Na0a I g Pt, s-et tihiy, — 5.26/" J0/d 130 0 Y4.L.Ka W .. 4 7 - 2a c, -7 7 2-373.5- 6. G� e J N• Cr�►�-�=� /703 /kip= S �2.1-�1,7X-Yya n � 7. � t • 1� �� �- l t lei l 4t' �� ( 77 -077 . � .$ 1. - zS z ez.6 9.o�a-rin�<e ,a - //O p00X- s.eg• t n. vl; n4.t e25)X 5 -99�j� /47e/z z 47 S 9 i7<S (ZoG)z 2b z PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE. NAME ADDRESS PHONE EMAIL &z2SV 3. )2636 - G 356 4. '';z_ f_/,qJ ti SE/ /1-17 / Q'4i--/ wr4 L4 g,15-39a 27> 5. 6/%1.p Ze-gerkein 75S S•a(s7 ?e�-+,•�. G�J'' 9$occ /0 -Y32s Ave_ 7. 7 ! 6 a 7 8. et!,--- C.:---j/7 (5-) e ,WA. qscs5 9. \/ ct('r-e-vl - A-\A 1 aS Wells 69-se N, LGo-1g S 10. G� PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE. NAME ADDRESS PHONE EMAIL r V ,�"y - ,��,� , ,� ��r�1, ,�M s M.44. 7,z 7 2. 3. 4. 5. • 6. . 7. • 8. 9. 10. PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE. NAME ADDRESS PHONE EMAIL as o 1 D4 2. `� . '�^�Z`lv 3,-(o � D/2_ a) '&25--27 I -(042-2_ 3 cz.:4.t..c9d/Z1./-0 Ac2.-/L r (.0* 3 ( 4. 1.-At1/2-6)cq-c Pmicti-) Wi° Sed(e1(511g �3c� ,t31Q�.0 Ave_ n E (4,k5) 5. 1i J/�� k9.-S Ian 'ovL 0/4- l ed r(o 687- /fin ti►J�C v►-� CiVg S 1.e 6. -ic:N* N " /90,E,61 u S 4,4 I°N., �(7. 16V 5 i 5.7 %) (0 2_00 7.0.E � LArJIO 129g5 St )( B 8. 2 �e : 4ig-.L*w,4. vet - S1= ' /V�e,C ca„ 2y 5/2 9. e- D�t t e p 6 c �(3 c�.� -6/J cP. J..A f'l�.e�vc a -Q; a, 1al,Aa kac:hFBI 2 - — �3.� ) 4 -- PETITION FOR THE.RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE. PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE. NAME ADDRESS PHONE EMAIL 1. j(oz� I�n�s , 446 Wt►. ter �� YQ ckqes6 14-25- z2_g-30c15- 2.� /Lit L l'lE /- // 554, /-(2-s2»?)L5 4051,,k&bi,&, �z 3. /'7 /,5^E.a/SG ' 2 36-' , 4. 1 / -\1/� ,7 !� c + PdS Lids- cg 5. 1a 1 Fj` I • 2(7, 3 6 6. / 6 1 0PC.e4501\- qti S w q . 7. 8. • Get Gi^ 6—Z / 2 612-4 4 9. A., /-c-f,i,..„4„:-„, /7 a./, 5 / 7415 2 COX cyFa_5 'VA- (ed-iv3S 10. R5,4 4,,c1 (i y . �(,�t� r cJ ii aa.c s,/-�t JSI, 1 k�,l.u�la v(J a ��is PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE. NAME ADDRESS PHONE EMAIL 1. 1./.i (owci ?too z /We, 6,, r 2. M i,i &D-AN Sb3g cc' S . w1au�C��c xulc�i uc�al�.r��'fi k•�, �.2� .� iq_cca /�ve�S. R en+Oh ) WA. 78as_ s. �rcl �. Rec 1, 4. NCB 1 q6! Le)/ - 9ASS 5. 6. ��/L �S��v �S� �G T i/Y. 7. ZP.45-2) �5T�l v d � ((a T/i4ST- . faz.8. 9. W 4-01.6 c.,v'ii. 2 S/`f ) Z T 4t Cult Re n e CAM `i Ste A53- 8 y-e/ 3c_ 10 ---Pj¢v COAJAI -2._ /71q So, • 5 T= �67v�e/ /i I PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE NAME ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL 1 NaN IrIcc f 1 Pazd ' e qg/7? _ 2 Pt( /z � ,/r- I c i I Y?l7 2 6 `� � Gf15_SC. --� Qt).4-r4 3a te, kiwi! c.?„ J bce;n�aC�• 3 rinjle. 1/.111.5cT r, I n�+55' 4tAhurh At/ 5 . 5 +&1� \AJ4 `1fS17� 4 . 1JIM(',� . IJ 7e1 10-2.1 L 5 Re.f-&-0f (LZ0 4 J- ,2vp/ 442771.67- &ler)/ G(// - n?. 3pace*, or /4- 0-/ 7 /7 8 ,e ,.e- SOS Caarhe • S ReA,r,71 , (,a . 9MSc- 9 `,g 6041 8`7C, SCE 154/'rf 1 /35125- /PoL .10 • (-5c>`A .2d/2r PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE NAME ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL 1 y );J c(U t a(-% it/ ?y01 . 7.3s-Soi3 tarxi ii,krazt 2 l4-1 Pi ,1/4 ofeieM 71,97 3 let e ���- 16GB4 ray RvN S, f, f2 .c%tO C Nk°51A^ f4(c 13 SE /B s . 4 5-dXS-�a0 o 6 3),.\t - S-- 90- to S• (- reg sf 011 -T C,c1 7 F'thr • ID(ScsE Ictp iba‘a• vrA-' t /Z ✓0i3 J 7 • r P 1 i( G ir.S�r 9 -e)eze/jh_ .; // -/�' Ste/ �,, �� //i M6 10 -Doh peckowicz &Sz S lla2ds q8/7,8- - PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE NAME ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL ShoY'ebre. ‘cIA 1 �QrnP 1 a. J . f�.I)OWL2s ' 162.38 Fir'RR ' (2o ) 36 -6 983 J ae.;ch��sCahcS.U , 2 0_Z.P./ ). cIJ1CJ� �i�Sc�� ��al- -5c-) . - S� ��J' 31 • 09. 1 4-G(.. 'k tvP•��G�rl 0�l 3fO1-"- �- �' ��2 G So 3/��ti sue- - /3y- % Mic:-/c/4,5E,��,Y. Covt . LJA 5 Cle 6 ttWO v_.((0.?\(-k-f- PAyAL • 7. Lr561 < < I3427 1 S --�: # z7/-iZ - . cl 8 .i.- u ( 17�/Z 7 (22 ��� .�,/�-� '7/ HAS z��-c{ S-2. 9 `" ,t, ,r' I SooS 1,N e 4v �� R€14-fivivA- Qe�lo b7 77-y5� 10 ,A.cg1 I. .ixw5 I V . Pi M ?o 5r i r C „ PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY • HISTORIC STRUCTURE NAME ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL 5E17t E, cov9• D-©6 7 -S-/a 35 1 JA NE BlISDOU /Q //V //oYo/cEWy e7 2 Oti SiActock Alte C 9 06,E l e f2s7zoq-3665 3Ark 6Jolic /rtA , ..Greer gcpitici4 7/1A kn Ft\ _ tiofee/14 5 jaWc5q-r1/664 1.7-Q(4- 5 Lea9r .e.417/c_ 7 fh 6 6/v _ c,2C&/r) 52e-c>25-0 7,05-g 4 at-,// Za• 95°3F 7 .' 0- -� /O 7 c9-14 s filler tit 7lhr' Iz 6 /-7- 5 �: � f ✓ F PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE NAME ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL 1 ,4%a,. / CQ// /7'/y-1/3E , . SE 4 Be.," (q ) --qy 76 2 f A3 _ 2 - 2 0 q cgs-- 3 1,t,k.o 6, ( 7 4l 3 //V4 4(,r 6 zYo�-� a-ilz-z-t-( 0C:it 3 k,„7.-,N ,ffize 8 4. ' 272/ -//5 P/ F- 9i0J57 9/V 2/1e7 Ce-‘, Wi<100 e , xi;i6 10 �-. -,,� t �-r Yc7' S� r S 5 PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE NAME ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL ZCL�F y�,�3yo�� 6(›Yo/citt/CE- 6.0, c ���- 1 C��� -2lf rs�� h4�� c.v25" 71 2 .fi r, ‘,1 �. I�I A R G R 6\1 F, \•O \kft L L s (a v r, c a 3 IA 1��-� �Z 2Z Avo 204-7z61-136 2 Z7/ 257Y Ir�q_cb-i 2.21e•Cbri 4 ;i1`; S ctSa.ra.�- _ ( tz- 80 S Se�,9 7k s I\ w ,Tha 33o(v S (c)"?6," 6LTACitaa-)yr Sectittia. Cl ccc n I z\5a ekeiu n c+. C 7 /\�Y1�PO V fa7 �C� ti'U� ce-l�c�(i / J C, �j .F F--i✓ 8 (16A.)73 3,,a5.6 9 SA h P-P55-Q/ S 14-1,12,/,u0 q V3-1- G9_06 ) 9 3-7CfG.,35 10 � fir, �. 4 PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE NAME ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL 1 a A7_____rdet.-- 02 3, Re o& 255--ceZ6 ��iu� _,ei 6002) 6cfei,,,J,,,,,,)47- col -_�n� P h E g:T:39 WA .5PA-C2V 019-E.,CO CCVA 0-((L&' N 311417 4 A0/2/e. l/ 7 �6 3 F qe-y,,04_ + c c,'-y `�z 5 �.', e- 5 9-106 tdr) L 6 z) 6'1 J5 3 Ls-a_ i 7 5,‘ 0111( : 8 Pcvz-t/I-e - �c C'7,5' 4f.� k� �:' 990 3 ( 9 EOCniN AIAL&T/ r15\.( I FO5e 10 011e REL. o)c-GA) 17579 S�" /Qv VW Pip Rerfi-oh.) /iY 9g0s'9 • PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE. NAME ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL 1 5mIf Lz v n• P/%z f/f77/eX 2572/A //- .1i W //M / /6y 2Gc 1 y35 a55 -- 7g1'5 &Vkli ‘0-tr aq • / 4 .�,4✓ L eI` P, , /•5 SSE / //( 9 t o z7-1-9 0z:1 5 !(m %)-e — Cot Morris S ee 9.8055 25 -z�i-9vo l 6 6( Ecio-exj- 622 t ?c five rC5_ re4�fi'i 9&55 4 z -Z ? -900 7 0-2 mart S Hoe Z-c3y) 7(n 035. tip. morns / . �- �� 76055 8 � �tc�--E �rZZ Back.o«inoid 360b8e6,Z)41 9 V)IC 6°G° IS /69 6/ack Otaod 61a�Dd' (poj 8�. 2-1 4/ Io 5u3amrt.eS� (00(o 1G9 a )tcvmdnci a\ S�� PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE NAME ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL 1 7/( S� ���. / f a2°E-17 7-705y 2 H E(L 0 Covtcort9 oS+- _ - 44o /7.53:45:E ,4r0-0d77,17,0 4. g_J ciao( 7%-rw S 6t 1_41(61d609 2 5 ntQxr) a ce I f(r2r f'v7'r1 . i?;24 3/ 6 !il\t/Ve_Aay--- /;202-,g: itO(4�l��d ALlo 1")C1•1 Q O q Z V. ->jito IPE-60(s gizahlal4DkV- 1 8 f%ien kE 1644 I Pei 9 ��� k /,� 462.y /Q! tL LiPZ-7-r WA- 9 505-6 10 Lt x rc& C, Lt()ctiAcr 4zA 5. lk<44. S-�: ' •O. c1 8lT3 PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE NAME ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL • 1 V 1 V/A-AJ 641 I7Af //.-a a- 50 pl CO RevI. A4 '-` A- y 17 �-6( -7 Z 7��7 2 1 j „IA_ poia, at. cijv6 12cti41'ef 1V/10S , ctRi 1 (e? --Loco- --122' c)°,0c1 3 nL /4=J- Rio l E 6 Jc ,L tiJT 2 /25'6 ��S�o? 28(o6Y' 4 i - , "f .3 a Sr 7 0/7$ II o _ ?go .S-,77-og3�72-LrAi, .l e f3 17:-/¢� S� ,(S fb 0 Wa SF 5 -3- Y/ yz,S�' 6 c.J-- eV / 6 c Z /5 z '`�rt. I/Lr. 5, tP Q6-c1,a..�r �/t4. 9cs25S�:5-lSi 7 . z, _ el0 -�:k 46 Sarrivi, WA- 9 s 6P 9 81 9 5, l c 0,3/sr 5 ce.�, -`. M1q- ?Eo3 YA5-0-085— < L 9/ 6C2T R i& ( N Al cti-A F °OS‘ sts' o l , i 1 g/-7 s� zed fir, /C v� �-� z'--) Ce?s•2i75- . .... - i , . ... '-4...:*-- ------- -**3.1401.rx•r-,,,, .--a-,;;"------- 4 0 CITY OF RENTON Illa • V.- - •, or 1055 South Grady Way -Renton,Washington 98055 0 `) . . ' SPR 3 0 .'0 i P'.14'111 — 0 3 2 in I-• vor,4.11 — OOP I- •. ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED m cc Q. P6F.41t. E41 1 -J.' 715R401 U.S. P 0 8.1-A ...EI. . . • ( ' 1:3 MOVED,LEFT No ADDRESS • OFeRwARDINGGRDEREXPI ED I3 ATTEMPTEDNOT MOOD .° .:c4Z1 OUNOIAIMED 0-EFUSE titif : —." —TArEs_ -.. ritt4;NEo vo sews oVigaM STREET POSTAL1SERVICE.. -.., ( glctwle@MI4UMB0ERDRESS 0 ' - -et F Fi .p 13 Es CATE D SER• W. 9 81.1 . Artice lerrilct — --'- 14415 21th Street SW . Seattle,WA 98166 ( j r------ , „ii, SUCH 1 ..,. ADDRESS t..., — 1 .. ( . I RETURN TO SENDER i _ • , , •••5 • 47—'1g'; POSTAGil: MAY-.I'01 • • 19 ..,*; P WY :m74c;49 9 • ) • . . • •r - .1 -  CITY OF RENTON h� Hearing Examiner Jesse Tanner,Mayor Fred J.Kaufman April 30, 2001 4 Daniel Palmer 16638 106th Avenue SE Renton, WA 98055 Re: Appeal of 95 Burnett Project LUA00-171,SA-H,ECF Dear Mr. Palmer: This office has reviewed your letter of April 25,2001 regarding the Lande Feed Store. Apparently, you filed this matter as an appeal of a decision regarding the redevelopment of the subject site and paid the appeal fee. .t This office is not directly dealing with the Lande Feed Store but rather the proposed Site Plan for the development of the underlying property and adjacent property for an apartment complex. Environmental decisions were already made that would have been appealable but an environmental appeal is now untimely. Since your appeal is not directed at any flaw in the decision to approve a Site Plan,this office sees no reason to change or modify the decision. Since an appeal fee was paid and the letter calls it an appeal,the matter will be forwarded to the City Clerk. If appropriate as an appeal of the Hearing Examiner's decision,the City Council will hold a session on this matter. This office is generally not involved in demolition permit matters, and it may be possible that a, separate appealable decision on demolition of the existing Lande Feed Store is possible. You will have to direct proper inquiries to the Development Services Division of the City. If this office can provide further assistance,please feel free to write. Sincerely, \to Fred J.Kau man • Hearing Examiner FJK:jt cc: Mayor Jesse Tanner Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Larry Warren, City Attorney Neil Watts, Development Services Steve Taylor, Development Services Parties of Record ;ant° 19012001 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425) 430-6515 •.J This paper contains 50%recycled material.20/noel consumer CITY OF RENTON i1s:53pm, E -1 , :,,_ _,, APR 2 6 2001 -$ ---- RECEIVED t(,/ rp,i 2, 2 0 0 / _ /7/67 otrin.93,5s4FFI.pEt.,7-c a. /7-2//7 ex') _ /*___5-- • io42ejt=is•7L -74 e c::?/-i Z 0 E" -/ 07 • -7 0 U r C C/...-C/0 /..-2 - • -ia. //0 CA.1 /4 5 av ( --ret="e7-2 e, uat ...e-9ee,--,c• it Z- /1/.Z .1.5- ---- ---- ---/--, __S- -Z, 1/eZ--------- ..S-' 74 & 3% ' /'' '/*.oj er/-- r/9/5"0 cei/i79 /* t=.oc-c..., 70/ ./> ? _ .c?re..s.... /:„ee=er, • I •• - ' '-• .•-.5.76,e1 - 7:.3. CZ- -• .‘ 01/...7 C>L7' • C;I °'.?di'Ke /Qe t 0 1• .7 ‘0 CA)/? - 1/7/Lr JO, a - --/--7---1-_ 6,7 1==' 7, 7/ e _ e'r _ ,• • /, exet.. .-7-7_, e5.4-5- 0.9z1 Zj _ Cler? 7C.) /' • '/9,(74/TE"C7L&re= • />-'1 /0 (2't-'10/ - -e'r7 _ .AEG=),-,7f5>-7 ) : Z- .-77tts=/' 0 /- - ;IS' - c=? -5 - Xr:s 76 /cc:5‘,.. , -2 •_ /_..s- .- c/en., 2/ (,_ -,-777 e- cmk//gctr,/y ----evs . -(..D.c7 _,_ .:_, /7 /.-...411 - / 0, .2 ..s- / ..e n stzvi -if-.7 ' t / -2-- 2: 6,(.7. _ 746 ' ') =-," t- /-7 ij ...--7. ' • _ Z/...9 74-* 5 - -cL /7.?/_5* 77-0/ c - - - ' - -----7---Y., ,-- - /.7.-- ----- ,. . -- --"' i-'-.. z/Ae- -- . . . , . . . .. , . . . ' . o . z (,) " • ' . ) . y\ vv_ I;v0) ) ( 11 \•. r () . 0 -p61, i0) (q . IN 'Pro) 0 (1 . .. - ,01 ' /V1k • \ (i) N. k iii\Qo f) ' • . . '\ • ff \ N' VI' Z ' ' 1 . rrQ 'D \ `. • p() 154\ %, 1• P \ ifiii .' (( ,. .- L . , vr• i: , A K\ , k : i - r6 HO . ND\L . ‘ ik-) .) ,N \-7 .-1 ' k 0. 0/-) • Qi r) 6 P ti• )1, 1 r) t ' z Ir) . ' (,)\\ : II,- . 1 ).. . at . . r .' 1).•.i Q (). ..\ 1 \ . ) \‘ \ ° . : . .. . . ' \ • 11 • .: t7) V ` -P ;.1 kr\ rArc) N Q4'.Nrs) :1\ ' . r 'l ' c)) .'\1/4 r.W ..k \ P ? ' Q\,(13(,1 .•Q 'gr) '(1 i ` k`7' ‘ (g .'11,5) 1•,$ ' ) r116)\ ' 2 ; C.-- (3 Irti N3 r% I V) PI- M I I . >j) 1 I . \ I -\\A :k k\ck i . . tR 1.)4 • /7) //0"/<)?/1/ A° dzg R (3 c3i if Q/ .97 /c9/2"-LT, /c —(tQ4/ ' ) poZ -3ao W 401,)oa t L 9 �� �j ‘c.# ,�✓tea d a r''?7 _ c �� � „/-0 c7 (2))J, Ey)/ G:).75" ' El cI3, // 3,7y ' cC/ /-Na o, Qom' - 1,,/ 44/e-)s ./ j ,z )3, /7Z_ o/i/ acj i rJ bU , n 01) G4 , Z. Z.. 2 1. _ Q - -/) "7 - - c37 (3) O S h o ) . gV40 .5" ),' / qz9.4) alrY) 2) 1' e% i a w ,Y c �/ • IImo - 2 J , - 0/z. ' OL ' 9 E o p / % b/ £z. Q � ' QZ- ' .9 � h c u`Q,�/ of /l/ M:1)Y.,\‘31 -4//544-, e.7/ / 110 l/4 , />J4 4-.' ry2 'Yl b/ 1/ t7/2/ 3.�f, o/ l b.y�,-� L' a ',��'�•'�/V J/J9 ..) s ./t"/101 o►n./ '/ f/."-OJ n ,z )J/I/G//d 0,2 'V 94/ 41 m CITY F RENTON City Clerk Jesse Tanner,Mayor Marilyn J.Petersen May 8, 2001 . , Daniel Palmer 16638 106th SE Renton, WA 98055 Re: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's Decision; 95 Burnett Ave. S. Site Approval Application(Lande Feed Site); File No. SA-00-FYS ►'7 I Dear Mr. Palmer: At the regular Council meeting of May 7, 2001, the Renton City Council dismissed your appeal filed on April 26, 2001. According to the City Attorney, the time for making the appeal has long past for either the historical preservation policy adoption or a SEPA appeal, and the appeal raised no issues concerning the approval of the site plan. If I can provide additional information or assistance,please feel free to call. Sincerely, 711idde Ile,U411.12/rvry Michele Neumann • Deputy City Clerk cc: Mayor Jesse Tanner Council President Dan Clawson Steve Taylor, Development Services Division Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner ' ,nto 901 2001 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 -(425) 430-6510 / FAX (425) 430-6516 ''` , j '� el Thispaper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer ell ten�1� ) ys May 7,2001 Renton City Council Minutes Page 141 STATE LAW CHANGING COMPENSATION TO FULL FAIR MARKET VALUE AS APPRAISED BECOMES EFFECTIVE. CARRIED. ADMINISTRATIVE Derek Todd,Assistant to the Chief Administrative Officer,reviewed a written REPORT administrative report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2001 and beyond. Items noted included: * The Renton Community Foundation announced that BP donated$15,000 to support Rentennial,Renton's premier Centennial performance. BP's partnership with the Foundation,the City of Renton, and Renton Arts Plan Together(RAPT)will allow tickets to be offered free to all individuals and families,will help to defray some pageant production costs, and will also permit the production to be simulcast in a separate room thereby allowing parents to watch the program with their younger children. * A potential archeological site was uncovered during the excavation for a sanitary sewer line at Renton High School. Work on this construction project was temporarily stopped while the State Office of Historic Preservation and a consultant archeologist were contacted. Although it has not been professionally determined whether or not this is an archeologically significant site,the Renton School District has decided to relocate their sewer line so as not to disturb the site. * General Fund,Community Development Block Grant(CDBG)public service,and CDBG capital funding applications are currently available through the City of Renton for 2002 funding. All applications are due May 21s`and may be downloaded from the city's web site,or obtained by calling the Human Services staff at 425-430-6650. AUDIENCE COMMENT Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney, advised,citizens that Council could not hear comments related to the Lande Feed site since there is an appeal pending on the Hearing Examiner's decision regarding the matter. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY PARKER,COUNCIL SUSPEND THE RULES AND ADVANCE TO CONSENT AGENDA ITEM 7.c. REGARDING THIS MA IThR. CARRIED. Consent Agenda Item 7.c. City Attorney recommended dismissal of the appeal of the Hearing Appeal: 95 Burnett Ave. S. Examiner's decision regarding the 95 Burnett Ave. S. site approval application Project(Lande Feed Mill Site), (SA-00-155),demolition of Lande Feed Mill and construction of a four-story SA-00-155 apartment structure(118 units). The appeal, filed by Daniel Palmer raised no issues concerning the site plan approval and was untimely for SEPA or historical preservation policy issues. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY CLAWSON,COUNCIL DISMISS THE APPEAL. CARRIED. Citizen Comment:Horton— Barbara B.Horton, co-president of the Renton Historical Society,20613 SE Lande Feed Building 291s`P1.Kent, 98042,expressed her views regarding the Lande Feed Mill Preservation preservation;the King County resource inventory database;the City's land use i-1 policies; and the King County Landmarks and Preservations Office interlocal agreement. Ms.Horton stated that Renton's Comprehensive Plan contains eight policies that obligate the City to protect its historic resources;however, the City has no ordinances in place to support the policies. She urged Council to adopt ordinances related to historic preservation. f < -71 �� I� May?,2001 Renton City Council Minutes Page 142 Ms.Horton also submitted two petitions: the first signed by 162 citizens requested that Council preserve the Lande Feed Company historic structure; and the second petition, signed by 78 citizens,requested that the City conduct a study of non-renewable Historic Resource Policies in Renton's Comprehensive Plan and implement an active plan for the survey and preservation study of valuable historic sites. Citizen Comment:Richter— Marge Richter,300 Meadow Ave.N.,Renton, 98055,read and agreed with a Lande Feed Building letter written by Connie Hoffman, 1003 N. 3'd St.,Renton,98055, expressing Preservation concern at the proposed loss of the Lande Feed store,and urged Council to save the building. Citizen Comment:Tennison— Elizabeth Tennison, 16101 1261 Ave. SE,Renton, 98058,stated that she was a Lande Feed Building Lande Feed customer,4-H leader and president of the King County 4-H Preservation Association. She requested that the Lande Feed building be preserved,as it is a connection to a culture and a way of life that should be saved. Commenting that he is also is a customer of Lande Feed,Councilman Corman noted that solutions regarding preservation are not easily reached since property owners have the right to sell their property. Citizen Comment:Lehnerz— Jessica Lehnerz, 1921 Talbot Rd.S.,Renton,98058, expressed her concerns Lande Feed Building regarding the potential for school overcrowding if apartments are built on the Preservation Lande Feed Mill site. She stated that in order to honor the past, as Renton's centennial motto states,the Lande Feed building should not be demolished. Citizen Comment:Bean—St. Paula Bean, 334 Morris Ave.S.,Renton, 98055, expressed her concerns Anthony's Church Vacation, regarding the St.Anthony Church street vacation request. She stated that Whitworth Ave S between S 4th although she is an immediate neighbor, she has received no information St&Parallel Alley(VAC-00- regarding this matter,and voiced concern about possibly losing her property. 003) Mayor Tanner assured Ms.Bean that the concerns of the surrounding neighbors would be taken into consideration. He stated that she would be listed as a party of record,and requested that Planning/Building/Public Works Department staff explain the street vacation process to her. Citizen Comment:Anarde— Richard Anarde,717 SW 3'd Pl.,Renton, 98055,urged Council to enter into an Lande Feed Building interlocal agreement with King County for the historical preservation of Preservation landmarks within Renton. Mr.Anarde requested that the City retain Lande Feed and suggested the possibility of relocating it. Citizen Comment:Palmer— Daniel Palmer, 16638 106th Ave.SE,Renton, 98055,appellant and part-time Lande Feed Building Green River Community College history teacher, suggested creative Preservation alternatives to the demolition of the Lande Feed Mill building. His suggestions included moving the structure to another site to be restored and enhanced, obtaining assistance through the King County Landmark Designation interlocal agreement,undertaking fund-raising efforts in conjunction with the City's centennial celebration, or imposing an emergency moratorium. Mr.Palmer urged Council to focus on historic preservation, assess the Comprehensive Plan and the City's resources,incorporate preservation into revitalization,and work together to develop a plan for historical preservation. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion,which follows the listing. Council Minutes of April 23, Approval of Council minutes of April 23,2001. Council concur. 2001 rA 61. Vpw. ` \4-15 '`- IZ slyfie 1s PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE • WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE. NAME ADDRESS PHONE EMAIL 1. 6?ah) Gv1,-'u- • I G 90 /-„ E i wi ' 7e'd°.i 980tr1 `(z r -3 Y- 09 7f 2. fO..&A) ! c 1 e l 3 craRo-'p,S()-•- k.r,t •*S.P.. 1 4 Mcri — ` �= 2-0%3cfcrt 3. 4 ) eL (56 .rr )P7 eovi-vii,h14 s-763 4.N.J(:ka�� .c �. - (S l 2.8 4 5. 94,b, - voa S. ias s�. ,i w:/� �� )ve -tee 6. 0,.(Vlb Fs - 2S ( eo' a, i taut- � 7.G(te& LARsc1 - `L2-�c��JTh . AO, S_ REtjc 3 awn. 4-t c-22-it ---!/1-1 6632 /6'°l4 S?��� t � �6- 9. 10. PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE • WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE. NAME ADDRESS PHONE EMAIL (2 53) frs s-5 9YL 1. Alai) Jals .2 g'/,�2 5/974 Ala e S>i'r.ko, 41A- Sar.7oGJa/sl, e'S.ro 2.J A1��t :� s�Q.�ilC24-1 / 5/eti-fip, ll ^3•bo.(-e_ CI CC-d r.'"'1 g06,-- SF/t" r e.,,,h„ (J V/ OS-5.. iza V..15-430-qa)(0, �"4. `� /� (-L_fl) Z,.6Ere - 5' -Utl Cil- 1'Qi iqq,OV ( eo.rJJ --6. ear 5 t5 ete-tiO0 d Alc\IQ 7. Jason G-itilhiSstvn 40 ilSO 175S1T .S cetCtG c(CC( 00 . 8 am U mi l' h., 13 LiI LI- 15 k A vt,S E QQ-s--"o.- 5?OS --- s.Vca:-- ysz i S, 1/✓qd .Sr: -C-e°-W-t V lit PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE ' WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE. NAME ADDRESS PHONE EMAIL 4'2442-7.4 vs 1. U,,, M 6v, /3 off- a`/ 1- So. ,it 2 6.-Q.x9�-,_.2, 7_9-t cl'?-ovS `� .s-ZZG--M,v j cote YKoor ee k6,0.cor l(0I01 l.U- .G & sg 3.at -.? q Ye 5-2- `7125- 27(- 3 -7r 3 1 7)7;4 1(4,1//,? ",e-t/i,eril, czo *A•te,, ,iy C62-iiii. Y. "-:: gO4-- 3',5--Y) 5. (‘ d Jag �g,�d( 7 X�Sr2 2 8 -5582_ 6. 43,Q427- 1` 0rcR-xl 442. cJe115 fr 5 La( i(2 -25--- 7O 7. 8. 9. 10. PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE • WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE. NAME ADDRESS PHONE EMAIL 1. 7fik#a/ 2702 C71_ 2.53--6W-Of-/53 2/Tito/1W I), KC e32 t-fraRe iu fwe-wclzia citz_5-23s-o3.2_c 3. f2 i 1 ((ZS- zs5- (c ?a/ 9fs0 ryozs 4. l243 ail5 So�T D S 9 5. 6. • 7. 8. 9. 10. PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE ' WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE. NAME ADDRESS PHONE EMAIL 1. d4# a 7/7 S I4 3/1 e6 - 3. Cc� y G. z 'Thorn as 51,q/ (41,$)z s5-91 rL 4. nAoif 9- Dk -z aoq -rtJconeks AuE sus) 12,E►J Tod 644S) 5. r'ar _ 2c)c S PL . , Prl i m (;]) ir 'NOS 6. k 1;:nro. ./2 9.-,-)u c(Aii 419/, (1 .'00' 7. 8. 9. 10. PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE • WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE. NAME ADDRESS PHONE EMAIL 1. '� 3j 4J/ 22s-z8/f 2.� �J ��.�. � d307 NE" 17 .7�EE7--/ R1:�//JN ;O6•'6Q e/773 Po 80K 1 3.a21S -A 1 e r_A To/ Re(,&6-7, Y s Aztiod, 6/4 IdC-11 -517/ 5. (11/1)2_,0 e L• isexa. tm tST 12e,,A a N �-7 I-/a C7 es-3- , 6. S P �-7/1 o2(2-e:-1 76, 7. 8. 9. 10. . PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE • WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE. NAME ADDRESS PHONE EMAIL • 1. k2 w\J-- vve fly; c s.)-S S=(`t(� r0)LI 2. /7 /90)SU5IE/ ' te .G'. 3.1,,,, ,j', ii / � .2a- 4 2 ,5E 4. OS < r 11. S. -eBb. Izs8 V I�!�r-C , �° ' .#_1 (2LG) cc,. 5.lObit-PA', , Ftrec---A, („2 y / 'Lr) 60/ 41e- ga 9 -q/j6 to• -ic? /L-.;Ab57-4v‘C 6, 06) 7_ ,z_1_,v 3 6,-;1414/eZcedmiz‘ 7. 8. 9. 10. PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYO.R AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE. NAME ADDRESS PHONE EMAIL 17 /1-Pr ¢CIS 4&O? 4Ltiti) Att 2.cla,50AL cam- 604 D ) 4 se- cla-5-.2-3,5 i z/ 3. c.ue, //0l 7 / 1/S Ale cf yS 2S ogZ 4. 3icke. e_ oc_v 4 Z S )-04�i 2(z,g 5. 230) nit Srt S7a57 42S 2.5S 3S75 6. .4r.` - 7367 - O7 7 O 16 42s�zs�-L)�71 7. ' ) i/M )Ts u 1017 K raN- 1ss/1-a 0414 m), -a77 - /93S 8. 86/0AM/0 666-ert 'e /(fir LE Aue AE ibt C O4 9( 5? 9. C-A 1-ts ilA t 11 1 G0 Se! 3/ s 7 54- p „ l!2 S 2 7/ 6 174 10. /� / L G-�,(� 57A-6/74 o2D SG /5 a� SrPTA) 1IO2 S- g o76-6 r 17 PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE. NAME ADDRESS PHONE EMAIL 2. ,Q,... , a,�i�►oa:. q.5/ .,r�,y � ��� .,�r, - i 64 1 3. -re.0 2221.-/b`i I 4. / 333 / R ))/? Xl 1_1-6 9 7 44 5. 1 ce2? Se (0 L ST- Pe,v-ityl (N1-66d1 26 67CC34•6 6. 1Q-- Atic S S C ID()Q,mQAo n Pc vQ_ 31 o I EZ o n 1 W A 7. (,--wit L I V z 1' U ( p f 7 T 1 1,F )v R r 7 ON l-�{ IU5- 8. { c'r' e- itro /�i fZZS i2 �Il� LOA• W5, Z 3-4 ,7 9. an0r1/4 A M1 5 J o kl 6 Ct 64Alby gY6.59 s s M 0. �( ,91,4, 0196 % iv tu Q it&P qdOS ' -ram PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYO.R AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE. NAME ADDRESS PHONE EMAIL 1 JeAV__ (,111.,_ 40//d& 6 C-Y e-M D-7 7-7 7 6/ 2. a,�,�nt /4�// -/�-/�s �_S �/,25- 2/ �OQ7 3. 74/ . Li /5602s 5E//4 -1)5.-22 - b3/ 4. ,153-5 0.64 5614 /0. 9z3 •,21/-611,Z . l 5. � J CC l 25" (-1-- 1"p S E 1 O C`\- 6. 11-AMO,R, tbA I u(Pc( 5E /01h qa5 - 7q3 -5o15 7. Y1/, q5- eo y 2s ) S 3 8. XA(''Itkgk LIZ5 -235 ()3 9. 46,1L / 7S ° ) uA 1�12y � Ib° �� _ o. ;i4•• `gt,w10 9$oS q 1-(as - 226 0 k 6 a PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE.FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE. NAME ADDRESS PHONE EMAIL 1 `f Cam., o /*‘/ K- 2. 0 DoDa ie CQ it/VI ST al A-u'.r/1/44Rtto 6O v✓G/i t�i%&: 2z-ij.3.2-i • I n 4. 4,..1 g' 1 )?iyl a 9 7 rJef\- buc, e0 “, 5.3Z.FF S (0 a )UMLL A-Ve A)b, KF N r" 95-�y 6. tulaW. ket,fA/11 z 441-04 (Aleq, //CM° (1 eAgn-c=1-7 - ?, 1G . 3. co /W. sF 7 Afsl 1 _0131AI SO AI w A- 72-03sr 737 !r 140 C s� 8. "VANE_ Wg W 4 4J/4 ' �7 137-z-S tgj 9. ,Sh rz r 1 &s �„� c1F6S9 p.c. 5 ff_ 12514-, 10. CvAo 43C2sct PETITION FOR THE RETENTION.OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE •PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE. NAME ADDRESS PHONE EMAIL nriv: 7/0kio Icw 2. CC LAq7s 4( 1� F7 3., 41 81'00 )q 131 P1. 73 -4.1 11 . .4- "g'/ A0(jAhh-oerfeit 5. 0/1. -3.0 /l/ -'7&eas /- ff'b 6. 61( (( 9, z L6 - 6c,7 . 7. 4465 i m flre_Pe_ 7(- 73.E • s. l 633 sr Iyy N-41-74ste ' cam/ s.✓Vika fArntictei "-4 2�-SE. 1245 Sk, bky,,oneyo5jta Eittmait .�M 10. Z711S Z NA I Li-r4ei 12k5 • PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE. NAME ADDRESS PHONE EMAIL M.litk- 14,7ci/"; cKqc-27/7/7e/c)(5d/z&e_ 3. 3sE3 Lid i 4-e_ 4. e,44,4 &IL5 �t 5 l<l e , 5. -4--. %L D. 6. olivj ts- .- 2_2 lU / / / �� � L S 7 zz - ili �G_s : 8.4/.s1NL 111 r PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE. NAME ADDRESS PHONE EMAIL yl F, j' -Zo,,�. ll/ 4- 1 frhe�k 2 , q'rv� �2 4‘,,,,,,-01e ids 4. SaAA SjCO ko( . of-7 Lefc.".. Vtc t /3 i, 9 ` D,S eLL 5. 01 -`n Yc. 4 I til0 11 6. r / � IUE 7. J�,,�.e� - 8. 0/ riihiCe deAd011 9. , Grvx./ 9/ 6- JAC/ 905 OZrA/A/ 'ap PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE. NAME ADDRESS PHONE EMAIL ker* wA 1 S1ror r wit/it/ SEaiB-T'`f Ca53)63(-/9a3 . 3. 41,4} ///ig /J o 9 c9,a�_, i/4'v,,_J N S `zs- oTSS=,�902 4. 711( - 'di1,21i1 9/ / 114 o- A-e. t 4.7 5- 2 6 -2 �8 5 /GZ /yr ?2 / 7�� 02-P / ( (1i,r a2 )--6 2 6 P7 6. �( _-vt,C `? 1 / J l o q jc pr--,„sow /11� I-E. e/2 $ 27(GZ 7/ 7. f4,4 ei 0 4/ /,/ei.Aiz, if Ve 2426'�U 2,7g:2 • 8. 406 l ) 2282-, ,,/iC/-42 i , 4a - ` 5-er 9. 332 Noitas /1-05k/E (1 ) c- 7389- 10. ' ' / PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE. NAME ADDRESS PHONE EMAIL 0 l "N 3 ST' LOV-0 ( C.? �....y . . l O CD (5�- ThcA 3. 1 S 9 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE • WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE. NAME ADDRESS PHONE EMAIL (Las) 1. &emoi,__BO x 133 .E . s1-. 1-/-2047 2. cL - 10 � 3g 14,tA._ g 3 y , l i'C de;I L 1 r n 611 / (jO S I(p 2 t ECin7n yo 4.ga g1C.ff, / i7 t/P) I�� t� /'L �� j t 7.6)/C( i y, sv3a /3r) 5. gA)A)PrTy9 59-ic i r - l '71-9 ,C avrwiv J ck c - )55- 6. Cl� S - OS,7 g /1-- /(Co g- sszo_ k 4),,t/Ce)x/, Gv . 7. 66Yh( J, C/4 a1 ?Be LL 1 cog' sou 43 q� (entu 8. AlCitaCt A. )11'&1(_ 1440 )64-174 � - J � 9. \ Cortsa (-)tb • C,:coidon ,Th , lack-H/4 (IQ r(v) - 7g//(f PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE • WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE. NAME ADDRESS PHONE EMAIL //)/9 WM/0 •on.-77.2 - '7V7 1. ir�c� , aGI/A- 11/7/1 .h/ouy e 9hi/�/41r.6". 7 5"M s / u D doirL 2/ �' - - zt, '81- >7 i,�ess c ooaoc,err, l :),076r-cf:3 7J 3 �� / �76-L&A-rerl tea?�?�� - , G0/9 2J 3-r6- Crl)ia°Aoe SE*.37 407r-0135 5a7.3 4. tlq,Q'c l?•.1iTo,v, to A 98059, 5. f> PO7J4) FAQ 3I5,7 5-aTt-'ti J4- 0-co I 6. ItL elliffOga8 -'e (76 /70o /3oj-��� /� 9 os mod'7. ��� , �. Ste' ,� ,, �f� � S 8. /ID i 7 '31 19 (, -A E S q£?oc8 9. Cq 1 0EAA ‘ 1g3g6� ('.ias) 2 -i7! 1 • PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE • WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE. NAME ADDRESS PHONE EMAIL 1le,i9rg/ E.VS 9ZrzL -2276 /3 ?e 2. 2o� Q �.u-� 5-Q to -rs,_ b -P . , / -(tAlit SE) qt-5-2:7l- 3I53 3. � iC 5 2 -kepi ,� ;_lam;f� ' I 4. 2<r / o -oZ - o I, e . • 4,00g 7o)sa.P.,z. ge)7Ec 6=.206)117 -6 0-q 6. C >oq 8u'/?V) ( /9)i4 5. /24a4i W 7. 0 / 22 8. `J Nk l�l 1 Q r<h vot yl�1 I"� 10 1: Vh 3145 R V01) l j1 Av war 9. 1(\/YeS d M rioravant° — 31-15 RaincloiPk Ave Seai t'I.e :\` io. phbeBe Kafir lob LK • i1/' Sh • S gatthgIA/A. PETITION FOR THE RETENTION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE GREATER RENTON COMMUNITY, ASK THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILTAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TOWARD THE PRESERVATION OF THE LANDE FEED COMPANY HISTORIC STRUCTURE. I NAME ADDRESS PHONE EMAIL Sl\gri A LA M A E • ( '( PA) )0? 2.)>-t-:;,--1 3 L1 ZJ�, �. / 5�, ,e 1r0iu ( zs� zs 5�Z31 3. Q 4 ni (6-cA,i) �(� �q c*. ��: � " � � - yo e) 4. .,,%/144/61 4(11741101 . /1.-°7 g7W 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. SU.bv►wli elt 101 bo 4 -to-(1 • li 1 at shl°� C°'{' ETITION D lGG Vl S FOR CITY OF RENTON TO COMPLY WITH J HISTORIC PRESERVATION POLICIES We—the citizens of the Greater Renton Community— ask that the mayor and city council take an immediate step toward the urgent need for: 1. A study of the non-renewable Historic Resource Policies in the City of Renton's Comprehensive Plan 2. Policies as called for by the State Growth Management Act (GMA) 3. Implementation of an active plan for a survey and preservation study of valuable historic sites Name Address Phone E-mail 1. (A/L-fili� �/Y ? Afe,Stat)scy s� 6 67 see;0(7).t� Crime 2. e742��� /L ���� �. c23O7 IV E 4 TH ageeT, ,eENTU,u, 0106.660 0/23 3. .00DLI:5 rA cOO// '& let( ,' 5E /' /0 Ze l,4c4 gas f ?3Y7/ , 5. L lam u s , ► gas- lc I S> e i. s (fie -. P-7 I- I 6. � 453-f b2 � . �- (7// 6562);1 ��. ��u� G� ��31v 7. yzs /q 3n 1y.3 (h S aa4 mac? 3 ,5R7- 0 s 9eD : ' 11 . 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. * Supportive material next page PETITION FOR CITY OF RENTON TO COMPLY WITH HISTORIC PRESERVATION POLICIES We—the citizens of the Greater Renton Community— ask that the mayor and city council take an immediate step toward the urgent need for: 1. A study of the non-renewable Historic Resource Policies in the City of Renton's Comprehensive Plan 2. Policies as called for by the State Growth Management Act (GMA) 3. Implementation of an active plan for a survey and preservation study of valuable historic sites Name Address Phone E-mail 1. AcxvicW S► 11411N Zrbq-at (25 nA ►smCo0) .Lc» 2. A Yka � �,,V''"`�'`' q 3c1, 5o Will' ao_.. 7a( (25� 3. t I ace-6,, 4. 4 Ir / VG rs��- u 1q 5, Il Li G41 721'"1Z55 Fax KCGS' Ati l;C6, 5.Aji%- �,z.�v T fGt 6. cH / S /f�}"t�, S,� (2e?(;) r 44,c1. ,,cl ief,(<"v,h-car-. 7. /ram (// \+\ J /��[ 1' C /`� �j�1. �VO�C..'(�`.•1 5e, (4,1sa- lJ I � V�Ip i�� ( 6) 04/L -GO(I Ark,llg S. I>L,ci ( i,, 3-0 C i S J 14l .5+. 0).0(0 7,25 -/I 02<1 9. , � 6PArc -Wood leas-2 cS'6,„ (a ) 10. 11. 5/ G1/0-4 7-7 ,9-0 (t 2_0 6 Z "-Sri 1- I osv 'JGv (2_z70 6 K533 12. 13. I �� 1 . Van 9, f� 1-ci; � S - JIB � Z� -0-gg 14. r �v j,e.t.44 ) g9-0,16 /IV - -6' '2 * Supportive material next page • { PETITION { FOR CITY OF RENTON TO COMPLY WITH HISTORIC PRESERVATION POLICIES We—the citizens of the Greater Renton Community— ask that the mayor and city council take an immediate step toward the urgent need for: 1. A study of the non-renewable Historic Resource Policies in the City of Renton's Comprehensive Plan 2. Policies as called for by the State Growth Management Act (GMA) 3. Implementation of an active plan for a survey and preservation study of valuable historic sites • Name Address Phone E-mail ,ffr4774-( 9'6/7 & 7 867.3 s,//6a 9 2. ,,ec�T'� ' b) 1-0-‘ 1,)els A-vr 1,(a gctii C( 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. * Supportive material next page PETITION FOR CITY OF RENTON TO COMPLY WITH HISTORIC PRESERVATION POLICIES We -the citizens of the Greater Renton Community- ask that the mayor and city council take an immediate step toward the urgent need for: 1. A study of the non-renewable Historic Resource Policies in the City of Renton's Comprehensive Plan 2. Policies as called for by the State Growth Management Act (GMA) 3. Implementation of an active plan for a survey and preservation study of valuable historic sites Name Address Phone E-mail i v H tNi5� �:L )\( , �,5 ' �.S'07/4>`) 2. « ,.Z .2 - / ri ,Itii-ote /7/ sekr, 3,-//vt, eeto,ts.,64 3. �EsvN a �EA)is: .624.1) �pedueda©� Aig it/ - %��ro.��t U��a c/A0 -6, �a�:c -76 9/ 4. / —1' �!'=a1 L.�ile.�.��-^)_> /J �iJro,�) Mi 9R1,56 4 .3a8-!b9) 5. ` . I &A, b��� „2, 1 `3// F lQ °��. �in��-w C�/97g6s G ds-, 6-s-/a3/ 6. Yn -Sc e,r it 1�� , �G � en��� f c��} 7 O 446 s's-/,23/ � � �sor1/ 1 .23O ,'g 3 ✓SE,z�/ f s g. �0 Aml / n/ -J /Do 3 X 1 *DC / mot 9d 9. Jo 40 d`(\ oov-r✓ /3 2 cji 1 ;)-ve S , / :1av1 7c5sd,s-S" Zzc 446A 10. K p--D eL r N= µ mo ri i P- 9. ?/ Sc, E/LD`UA) Gv/f- 9 s 11. 12. y2 S 1 • 14. * Supportive material next page • PItTITIC I f FOR I. - Y OF RENTON TO COMPLY NTH HISTORIC PRESERVATION POLICIES We—the citizens of the Greater Renton Community— ask that the mayor and city council take an immediate step toward the urgent need for: 1. A study of the non-renewable Historic Resource Policies in the City of Renton's Comprehensive Plan 2. Policies as called for by the State Growth Management Act(GMA) 3. Implementation of an active plan for a survey and preservation study of valuable historic sites Name Address Phone E-mail . . n]c4-%q5 1. - acp-J 2 C\ WO. ‘t° DOs klow\6S r-8_ (wo) 24.o1oe 105)_3 c44--- , e v", 93 5 20/S - �� L ss T-- __ amiuu Z.a4A6 (c -,3 .00,4-V a.)-e- Slui 62DG- Gctsci 5. (cSz3 L ti- oraNv 17-�- P�� Sw S (0qs soft Z���A- , A46 q93 9 -z4• /M T �2/ /2 55 7 4 o S. I (4Y4S., 061 . 8. 91/ I9ilo sil 5 (880115 zg) -- 9 ia,,,„„... 44. . ic.1-70 _ ./1,--.-erc,-(-- . ,,.?;-t,ie' r--7.„,..27,2--- / , --- Iv 0-7.---7 t 11 '1ngrAidiziArsti,J '.a 3 2e9- 1 ioi yam`'/4 y2=22Y-3 5- - .105 E EMI 13. 14. - * Supportive Material next page PETITION FOR CITY OF.RENTON TO COMPLY WITH HISTORIC PRESERVATION POLICIES , We-the citizens of the Greater Renton Community- ask that the mayor and city council take an immediate step toward,the urgent need for: 1. A study of the non-renewable Historic Resource Policies in the City of Renton's Comprehensive Plan 2. Policies as called for by the State Growth Management Act (GMA) 3. Implementation of an active plan for a survey and preservation study of valuable historic sites Name Address • • Phone E-mail 1. 2. r Cr loe 9r 79• , 44S 4-3v-54ST 3�. a„. 23Z,/,,„, xU ,„,, • yzS Z35-63.25 -:`-1N 99 e 4. � vjeceei4 ,vmc gaorde-Ou ---- 7 5. i, " S 2 " -1258i fa uv Tice �zy 5 0. zz► �-f�� Se�TIle goq-y/l 7.6,44)k( UCiga/ . q x,� �: (0?06) -T-a gg 8. ,i1(1) (Ati Vt,v 5 32 3 3 NE r ft G 5 cit7 9. J497 166e__.S. ; _jr046. • 1/45-71LTT/AKY-5---- 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. * Supportive material next page 2 SIGN UP LIST of PEOPLE INTERESTED IN HELPING TO SAVE HISTORIC LANDE FEED STORE And SAVE RENTON"S HISTORIC CHARACTER NAME ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL *A/S 1 /4PeLs177r, (C/F So /7% cfz.s" ®CCU 2v(o s50 4093 2. Cin C010 mr� \ovs v 3�5�-' C O5(O yZ5 2ZCo `�3L C ai `1 �nv rN `A® �,n-` - I)?��1 ; ��c �-P I/ /fie d� 1�� �s- �U J wy 7.1 / - / 7/q c7-6? 5. \ A ',-m 6. /f r cC l2 a �0� /#- a.1-ol`e ( -2 �,� �� gg-2 $'. q.5-1 L y,.k)avco .0qvE../As - ,E‘tr,Gv• y'acG� - �� 7. (-4a. ) i 6 R .° 8. 0 ) r ' J f 13 / rn . /c03 N ftt 1-/66 rA . ;; 10. �J� f't ,/i/o?.3d //3 �v3E L� i�/'����� L� t . 11. ,v„.Q Q�� � tit -�cQ 1 3 d -q q / e o n c Po has= 2 2 6-- 9 `l y (1 12. �,ra', 13. dzet.L, G�u-�(Q. l'Q/z G zoo 14. Mai c.e In (1 41(1'q S <<� I1(�2wi� e 9 6 7z ( ca S *Indicate (A) Active or (S) Supportive SIGN UP LIST of PEOPLE INTERESTED IN HELPING TO SAVE HISTORIC LANDE FEED STORE And SAVE RENTON"S HISTORIC CHARACTER NAME ADDRESS PHONE E-MAIL *A/S 1. M 01174 Mil l-tcVl 2°6 2. ;auk wli -vim .41936i S , I19 S4- qzi z5 nn ( Ca )i , kw1l0 , g3R'3 ,�^ a5 3 �,n v-b � 4. 6,11atti - I �O(/ (3 SS t Tr i'n L 63) -765s Vtowq , C0-14- 111/ c ,�, x jbe(ornk9--caLv;) Luk\ 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. *Indicate (A) Active or (S) Supportive kmktfed b If Bar IOa rat- o(+crn CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT SI 1)0 1 :4kUrit Amended 8/12/96 Q Y " ek ,CAti -1 Policy LU-337. The periodic review process for required, consistent with zoning,development a RC zoned sites shall include sufficient public operating code provisions,and environmental notice and comment opportunities and the ability analysis. and authority to add or remove conditions to address new circumstances and/or unanticipated Discussion: Extractive industries within the urban ' project-generated impacts. area require regulation to prevent nuisance impacts from impacting residential and critical Policy LU-338. Conditions and mitigation for areas. These policies are intended to create a significant adverse environmental impacts framework to reduce conflicts between these land associated with mining operations should be uses. . Historic and Archeological Resources Objective LU-UU: Protect historic and archeological resources in the City. * :,' µ 3:,-1 .. r " f,...7, .. j y.,:.,v.„,.:zr.,,,-; 1...k.-.1, , , 7';':.,,,,,, 4 iTi...,..----,. i.,.r.r osi,zi ‘9,4:,:?.,,, ' {3 1 Z . y i tss rr d.?•.7 ri •11I `a //2 1 : ,- ^s. i. (Fitt T1, , -•; y N;f idle,, c .3 -- ' ,,}. - a� ; . -{t{{�' t i • ley- .�— Y'la 1 .'nF •,,,,-...„:.-........, 1;•-'. . .H... i,:i .. -.iii fa Policy LU-339. Historic resources should be Policy LU-342. Historic resources should be identified and mapped within the City. incorporated into economic development and tourism activities in the City. Policy LU-340. Archeological and historic resources which have not been previously identified Policy LU-343. Adequate mitigation and buffering should be surveyed as part of the application should be established between historic resources process for any development. and other land uses. Buffers,site planning, clustering,transfer of development rights, or other Policy LU-341. The City should pursue interlocal similar:.incentives and control should be utilized. ' agreements with King County and other jurisdictions to identify and protect historic and Policy LU-344. Historic resources should be archeological resources. integrated into plans for parks, open space,and trails acquisition and development. DATE_ REGISTER • INCORP BUILT STATUS INTEGRITY Yes/Renton Yes/Renton Yes/Renton e Yes/ Renton or Tukwila ?? No/Yes Renton Yes/Renton Yes/Renton 1908 Yes/Renton 1907 Yes/Renton 1890's SR Yes/Renton c. 1875 Yes/Renton 1940-1942 SR Yes/Renton 1933 demol 93/4 Yes/Renton 1932 Yes/Renton 1922 demol 00?? Yes/Renton 1916 Yes/Renton 1898 SR Yes/Renton 1898 Yes/Renton c. 1910 Yes/Renton 1907 Yes/Renton 1908 Yes/Renton 1935 Yes/Renton 1919 Yes/Renton c. 1880 Yes/Renton 1910 Yes/Renton 1905 Yes/Renton No/pt KC 1902 demol 96 Yes/Renton 1900 Yes/Renton 1905 ??Yes/Renton 1941 Yes/Renton 1903 1906 or Yes/Renton 1911 Yes/Renton �s Yes/Renton 1898 SR l • J • FILE_ . NO_ HISTORIC_N COMMON_NAM ADDRESS Earlington Woods Village Earlington Woods Camp Lithic Site Railroad grade ','' PBM-3 Mariner WWII Patrol Bomber ( Lake Washington) Open Site Renton Sears-Fred Meyer Store Hardie Avenue 0224 Handley House 4904 Lake Washington Blvd. NE 0225 Kennydale Methodist Church Ted Pfeifle house 812 N 30th 0242 Renton Coal Mine Hoist Foundation 1,000 ft S of intersection of Grady Rd & Benson Way 0245 Mt. Olivet Cemetery Mt. Olivet Cemetery 100 Blaine NE 0323 Renton Fire Station Renton Fire Station 235 Mill Avenue South Houser Wy& Mill Ave 0327 Longacres Longacres Historic District West Valley Highway and S 158th St. 0357 Renton High School Renton High School 400 S Second 0358 Henry Ford School Henry Ford School 410 Wells Street South (formerly 416) 0359 Milwaukee Substation No. 27 Heglund Office Building 435 Shattuck Avenue S Snoqualmie Falls Power Co., Renton 0360 Substation Renton Area Multi-Service Center 1025 S 3rd St 1017 S 3rd? 0361 E.A. Mills House Kelley House 400 Mill Avenue 0362 Melrose Tavern Melrose Tavern 819 Houser Way S 0363 Telban House 508 Cedar Avenue South 0364 Ben Cake House Collins House 420 Cedar Avenue S 0645 [House] 9223 S 43rd St 0665 Lande Feed Company Lande Feed Company 95 Burnett Avenue S 0667 Warren Beerman Residence Helen Pepka Residence 614 S 17th St 0668 Dobson, Thomas Residence 707 S Tobin St. 0670 Agren House Oan D. Nimtz Residence 3906 Park Avenue N 0673 Barn Nielson,Ole Barn across from 14640 149th Ave SE (15151??) , 0680 Mitchell House Spagnole Residence 518 S Tobin 0681 [Commercial Builidng] Harold Building 934 S. 3rd St. 0683 [House] Vidos Residence 151 Taylor Ave NW 0684 Steeves House 209 Hardie Avenue SW 0685 [House] Holma Residence 335 Meadow Ave N 0686 [Hotel] Renton Hotel 116 S. 2nd St. Snoqualmie Falls Power Co., Renton . 0854 Substation Old Holmes Building 1025 S 3rd St/ 1017 S 3rd? 1n 11+bs , INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR LANDMARK SERVICES AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN KING COUNTY AND THE CITY OF RELATING TO LANDMARK DESIGNATION AND PROTECTION SERVICES THIS IS AN AGREEMENT between King County, a home rule charter county and a political subdivision of the State of Washington,hereinafter referred to as the "County," and the City of a municipal corporation of the State of Washington,hereinafter referred to as the "City". WHEREAS,the City is incorporated ; and WHEREAS,local governmental authority and jurisdiction with respect to the designation and protection of landmarks within the city limits resides with the City; and WHEREAS,the City desires to protect and preserve the historic buildings, structures, districts, sites, objects, and archaeological sites within the City for the benefit of present and future generations; and WHEREAS,the City does not have the organization and personnel to do so; and WHEREAS,the County is able to provide landmark designation and protection services for the City; and WHEREAS,it is in the public interest that the jurisdictions cooperate to provide efficient and cost effective landmark designation and protection; and WHEREAS,pursuant to R.C.W. 39.34,the Interlocal Cooperation Act,the parties are each authorized to enter into an agreement for cooperative action; NOW THEREFORE,the County and the City hereby agree: 1. Services. The County shall provide landmark designation and protection services using the criteria and procedures adopted in King County Ordinance 10474, K.C.C. 20.62 within the City limits. . 2. City's Responsibilities. In support of the County in the designation and protection of landmarks the City shall: A. Adopt an ordinance establishing regulations and procedures for the designation of historic buildings, structures, objects, districts, sites, objects, and archaeological sites as landmarks and for the protection of landmarks. Regulations and procedures shall be substantially the same as the regulations and procedures set forth in King County Ordinance 10474, KCC 20.62. The ordinance shall provide that the King County Landmarks and Heritage Commission shall have the authority to designate and protect landmarks within the City limits in accordance with the City ordinance. The ordinance shall include: 1. Provision for the appointment of a special member to the King County Landmarks and Heritage Commission as contemplated by K.C.C. 20.62.030. Interlocal Agreement/Landmark Services -Page 1 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE relating to the protection and preservation of landmarks in (name of CITY); establishing procedures for designation and preservation of landmarks; and providing for enforcement and prescribing penalties for violation. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF(name of CITY): SECTION 1. Findings and Declaration of Purpose. The City council finds that: A. The protection, enhancement, perpetuation, and use of buildings, sites, districts, structures and objects of historical, cultural, architectural, engineering, geographic, ethnic and archaeological significance located in (name of CITY) is necessary in the interest of the prosperity, civic pride and general welfare of the people of(name of CITY). B. Such cultural and historic resources are a significant part of the heritage, education and economic base of(name of CITY), and the economic, cultural and aesthetic well-being of the (name of CITY) cannot be maintained or enhanced by disregarding its heritage and by allowing the unnecessary destruction or defacement of such resources. C. Present preservation programs and activities are inadequate for insuring present and future generations of (name of CITY) residents and visitors a genuine opportunity to appreciate and enjoy our heritage. D. The purposes of this chapter are to: 1. Designate, preserve, protect, enhance, and perpetuate those sites, buildings, districts, structures and objects which reflect significant elements of the (name of CITY) county's, state's and nation's cultural, aesthetic, social, economic, political, architectural, ethnic, archaeological, engineering, historic and other heritage; 2. Foster civic pride in the beauty and accomplishments of the past; 3. Stabilize and improve the economic values and vitality of landmarks. 4. Protect and enhance the (name of CITY) tourist industry by promoting heritage- related tourism; 5. Promote the continued use, exhibition and interpretation of significant sites, districts, buildings, structures, and objects for the education, inspiration and welfare of the people of(name of CITY); 6. Promote and continue incentives for ownership and utilization of landmarks. 7. Assist, encourage, and provide incentives to public and private owners for preservation, restoration, rehabilitation, and use of landmark buildings, sites, districts, structures, and objects. 8. Work cooperatively with other jurisdictions to identify, evaluate, and protect historic resources in furtherance of the purposes of this chapter. SECTION 2. Landmarks and Heritage commission created-Membership and organization. A. The King County Landmarks and Heritage Commission established pursuant to King County Code, Chapter 20.62 is hereby designated and empowered to act as the Landmarks Commission for the (name of CITY) pursuant to the provisions of this ordinance. B. The Special Member of the King County Landmarks and Heritage Commission provided for in Section 20.60.030 of the King County Code shall be appointed by the mayor subject to confirmation of the council. Such special member shall have a demonstrated . interest and competence in historic preservation. Such appointment shall be made for a three-year term. Such special member shall serve until his or her successor is duly Model Local Landmark Ordinance(Reference)/Rev 3 - 1 N appointed and confirmed. In the event of a vacancy, an appointment shall be made to fill the vacancy in the same manner and with the same qualifications as if at the beginning of the term, and the person appointed to fill the vacancy shall hold the position for the remainder of the unexpired term. Such special member may be reappointed, but may not serve more than two consecutive three-year terms. Such special member shall be deemed to have served one full term if such special member resigns at any time after appointment or if such special member serves more than two years of an unexpired term. The special members of the commission shall serve without compensation except for out-of-pocket expenses incurred connected with commission meetings or program. The (name of CITY) shall reimburse such expenses incurred by such special member. C. The commission shall not conduct any public hearings required under this ordinance with respect to properties located within the city of (name of CITY) until its rules and regulations, including procedures consistent with this ordinance, have been filed with the city clerk. SECTION 3. The following sections of King County Code Chapter 20.62 are incorporated by reference herein and made a part of this ordinance: A. K.C.C. 20.62.020 - Definitions except as follows: 1. Paragraph F. is changed to read " 'Council'is the(name of CITY) city council. 2. Paragraph I. is changed to read " 'Director' is the (person or officer who approves building permits for the city). • B. K.C.C. 20.62.040 - Designation Criteria, except all references to "King County" are changed to read(name of CITY). C. K.C.C. 20.62.050 -Nomination Procedure. D. K.C.C. 20.62.070 - Designation Procedure, except all references to "King County" are changed to read(name of CITY). E. K.C.C. 20.62.080 - Certificate of Appropriateness Procedure, except the last sentence of paragraph A thereof. F. K.C.C. 20.62.100 - Evaluation of Economic Impact. G. K.C.C. 20.62.110 -Appeal Procedure. H. K.C.C. 20.62.130 -Penalty for Violation of Section 20.62.080 (Paragraph E. above). I. K.C.C. 20.62.140 - Special Valuation for Historic Properties. J. K.C.C. 20.62.150 - Historic Resources - review process, except all sections but the final sentence of paragraph B 4 and the entirety of paragraph C thereof. SECTION 4. Severability. If any provision of this ordinance or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the ordinance or the application of the provision to other persons or • circumstances is not affected. Model Local Landmark Ordinance(Reference)/Rev 3 - 2 M • INTRODUCED AND READ for the first time this day of , 20 PASSED this day of , 20 (name of CITY) COUNCIL (name of CITY), WASHINGTON Chair ATTEST: Clerk of the Council APPROVED this day of , 20 Mayor Model Local Landmark Ordinance(Reference)/Rev 3 - 3 . . .::::.::.:: ,,;':.,.;: > : ...: : <;:-: : ':.!.7::•; :::.:: :DE'VELOPMENT".Si~F�V CES•. VI. N:..;:;:: ::. :*•] ..' :'.::.. ::.:.:..: . . . . .. . . . :.:...... is• i��:.:',..`; >f::Y:.`.''.: ...:'::i:.:':''.: ,: .::: ................................... .. :::•: • ,.r :: :::•:::•:•' �:: : :: :•::: ,: . ,•,... : : :MA ,TER APPL.t AII7N ... ,: . ::; :::: :.::.:::PROJECT:tN'.ORMA ON .. ::: :: .>:: ..:.::;>: PROPERT;Y OW.N��.tS} �:::>;:':;...:::::':: ::;;:; , :,.... ... :..... ..... Note:';If:there is mbr6 than'.one legal Owner,please attach`'an a......ona(, ribiariietl Masfe�'Appiicatior►.for;fiach owner. PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAM . V�LIJ q '� EERLY STARkoklici4- qG B(ANE-577--- n PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)ILOC/A�TION: ., N • ADDRESS: /D �, I '''R l ti s/IJg Lk 73 - `7' al eIv6�Pug I ZIP: 055 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOU T NUM: '(S): CITY: �n TO ) �� • 0007,g 003760/) O051lc)00%'SOa. TELEPHONE NUMBER: • EXISTING LAND USES : ; o15 ---ova(, ---326 V V A-A,vus 0 7cyW a n.•,e .::' APPLI,C:A:•NT; If otherahan..owner):.:;':':;.: :; : -�w� sY s�-.,w , —� lKI Q .-- PROPOSED LAND USES: 1 -1 NAME: `J f \ Q�I��� �S �Iv C. Le e S c� 9z env. t1,�1 �' '-1-1,cep ( l ear-e�-0 N e Liz-to F COMPANY (if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN M•P DESIc ATION: ADDRESS: /� PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AP DES NATION (if applicable): [oe91 �Aiclrie 4L,� �Oc7 p DEVELOPM NT P ; :'NING CITE ZIP: �,+,/,�a CITY 0 RENTS ifYca �J 7 r/ • EXISTING ZONING: • CD DEC 2 1 ,20 ;i TELEPHONE NUMBER;-- PROPOSED ZONING {if applicaf3l g EWE i 0353 Oat'2- Iv � z- CONTACT PERSON.;:.:. : :. .;. :.. SITE AREA (SO. FT. OR ACREAGE): NAME: kErn— C J tinj v 5—i 2.a.1 4 S'-F- 1 COMPANY (if applicable): C�` PROJECT VALUE: /L Ltto/ v-uv � o--0- 7 omil-5 T�RR EY /4 Rc1'lricrs ADDRESS: �� w /�R L� 0 9 3D IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIF!R PRO TION AREA? N (. �._ l3 P No CITY: _ ZIP: . 8gLLC vuE IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE I ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? I TELEPHONE NUMBER and E-MAIL ADDRESS: • ' ' 0 ::: :..::..... : >:. .. ::. . A 004 >gate>:,- }t.�f.:i.:640.' :j ..): , .' ':: ::: :... :::<<::..:::::::::::::::::>:::::<: >:L GAiL. t SCRlP"ClOI.,:: pRO LI TY.. . t:..:...:.:..:..... .. . :.:..... ..,.. S-_— .. /427-7XCP :o - . • • ....:::.:....::.......: :....... t staff:wil.l::determine:.fee_• 1:::::::..:;;::; ..:::.: ::':::'::� :; : : �:;:.' > :Check:•:a11 applicatian:tYpes:::.thatapply,�.. l..:Y.:...:......: . . .., ..... .......:.::.. ........:. � . ........ ..... . . ..... ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: 1 —_ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ ' _ REZONE $ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT i •- • SPECIAL PERMIT $ SHORT PLAT __TEMPORARY PERMIT $ — TENTATIVE PLAT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ — PRELIMINARY PLAT 7. SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _ FINAL PLAT • .1CGRADE & FILL PERMIT s,. $ • .• (NO. CU. YDS: ' f ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY _ WAIVER $ FINAL _ WETLAND PERMIT $ • — ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ CONDITIONAL USE $ — VARIANCE $ _ EXEMPTION $No Charge _ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW REVISION $ , .. .:..:.. :::....... .. .: ::.:..:, :: AEFIDAV.IT::;(� OWNERSHIP .: !:��.' : :: '. : : ::.: << ,; -; ',: ..:: '::: I, (Print Na0) / , declare that I am (please check one) the owner of the property involved in thi :pplication, _the authorized representative to act for the property_c.rwr lisieqe attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing state is and answers hereir contained and the information herewith subrrzl'�te �•in(d a a 7cts true and correct to the best of my knowledge and bell: j i 40 .\yg10NFA.2 ill : OTARV %;• 9 • ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to be ore me, :Notary Public, in and X N i j for the State of VW14 residing ats.� (Name of Owner 'presentative4 PUBLIC ' 1 RErTt4 , on the i day If is)••,I i` ,7 0q, •�� b,� I,Qa�20 U ) t k 114,;4:.....7...:::At‘......_ 4.1.41.4.1#9c. )12__, , . (Signature of Owner/Representative) ' 7e"oe (Signature of Notary Public ? t f. : . .. .::.:::.: ;:<:::.::::>...::. : :: ::....::1.�,.:':: i'•.•:.: ::•.(Ttis.s.ectIon tobecompleted.f3y,City S..af:..l :...... .• ::.:::.:.:,. ... City`File NumIIer;. i iA " A. ' AD BSP . CAP-S `CAP-U' :.•CPA.: CU=A :CU • • . IrLA.. . ; . .. .. ...... . . S:: PL..... .. ... ... ...:... ' V»H W . :.MHP BF�UD. :FP PPR:,RUMP .,SA-A„ SA.' SHP1:=•A ::.SHPL-H � ;SP :;S.M :SME'r TP: A ....•. ,, .. ...<...:. • :.; c :.:��. T:tJ�CAL'FE�S: S : ' .�:: :. .:. '. .. .:: 70TAL:POSTAGE•PROV.in�b... $ �j . �..:. MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 03/00 . LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach separate set if necess. . ) ,Sr_ - 477/9C/7/ 6 APPLICATION & FEES .:. Check 'ell:application types.that apply--City staff will determine fee- :,. : ... ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: — COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ _ REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 1 SPECIAL PERMIT $ SHORT PLAT __TEMPORARY PERMIT $ � TENTATIVE PLAT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT V SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ FINAL PLAT 11GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: 1 ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: VARIANCE $ T (FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY _WAIVER $ _ FINAL WETLAND PERMIT $ ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: _ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ _ VARIANCE $ — EXEMPTION $No Charge — ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW REVISION $ VI OWNERSHIP . AFFIDAVIT 7.OF�OW : : . . , I, (Print Name) , declare that I am (please check one) _the owner of the property involved in thi .application, _the authorized representative to act for the property owner (please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing state is and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and bell- ._--—--— _ 67 4 ATTEST: Subscribe d sworn to be ore me, ;Notary Public, in and Q _ for the St to of residing eI,t -}/'I (Name of wner/Representative) , on the 3 day , p oy y oC P�'K -- STEPHANIE J.BOfY 1 (Signature of caner/Representative) NOTARY PU �, s O. STATE OF INASHI ti� !;emu a of Notary Pu II ! COMMISSION BRUARY 1.9,2004 I (This section to be completed by City Staff.) City File Number: . . A AAD SSP CAP-S CAP-U CPA CU-.A CU ' ECF LLA MHP 'FPUD FP PP R RVMP :.SA-A SA-H SHPL-A SHPL-H SP SM SME 1. TP :A V-B V-H W TOTAL FEES: $ TOTAL POSTAGE PROVIDED: $ % 4 1 MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 03/00 . • • • DURABLE GENERAL POWER OF •ATTORNEY • (with appointment of Guardian and statutory powers) 1. Designation: I, RUDOLPH J.' STARKOVICH• as principal, do hereby appoint BEVERLY J. STARKOVICH, my wife, as my attorney-in-fact, with full power and authority to do and perform all acts in my place and stead as fully as I might do and perform such acts as principal. 2. Purpose: The primary purpose in granting this Durable General Power of Attorney is to provide for my needs now and should I hereafter become incompetent. Accordingly, my attorney-in-fact shall have all powers as are necessary or desirable to provide for my support, maintenance, health, emergencies and urgent necessities. 3. Powers: My attorney-in-fact, as fiduciary, shall have all powers of absolute ownership of all assets and liabilities of the principal of every kind and character, whether located within or outside of the State of Washington. Notwithstanding the generality of the foregoing powers granted to my attorney-in-fact, my attorney-in- fact shall have the following additional specific authority and powers: (a) Estate Planning Documentation: The attorney-in-fact shall have the authority to make, amend, alter or revoke any will, codicil, life .insurance 'beneficiary designation, employee benefit" plan beneficiary designation, trust agreement, or community property agreement executed by me; (b) Gifts: The attorney-in-fact shall have the authority to make any gifts of property owned.by me, provided that my attorney- in-fact shall have no power to make gifts to herself with a value in excess of $10, 000.00 during any calendar year unless, in the sole and absolute discretion of my attorney- in-fact, such gift shall be deemed necessary for the health, education, support and maintenance of my attorney-in-fact in accordance with the accustomed standard of living of my attorney-in-fact, or except for the purpose of qualifying me to receive Medicaid or other similar benefits; (c) Real Estate: The attorney-in-fact shall have the authority to purchase, take possession of, sell, lease, mortgage or encumber, exchange, assign, endorse, release and convey real property, or any interest in real property, including a homestead; (d) Personal Property: The attorney-in-fact shall have the authority to purchase, take possession of, sell, lease, mortgage or encumber, exchange, assign, endorse, release and convey personal property, or any interest in personal property; 1 fk :' r 9. Accounting: The attorney-in-fact shall keep accurate records of the principal's financial affairs relating to all transactions in which the attorney-in-fact is involved in the capacity as attorney-in- fact of the principal. Upon request, the attorney-in-fact shall be required to account to the principal, if competent, to any subsequently appointed attorney-in-fact, guardian of the estate of the principal, or to any subsequently appointed personal representative of the principal. 10. Governing Law: The laws of the State of Washington shall govern this power of attorney. DATED: October _ 9 , 1996. ‘PI•.. :mac ). t . RUDOLPH J. STARKOVICH STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING ) ss ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that RUDOLPH J. STARKOVICH is the person who appeared before me, and who signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. DATED: October 9 , 1996. 4111111 r'' *sq,,•• Notary Public in an for the State of * ,(R .iIYa Washington. Ng s.� � o Notary: CAROLANN HUGHES '`` • My appointment expires: 0/9/ao .,,�tE p F ,p°' T9'. 6: 111:2/26/96:tmj 6 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T.A.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A (Continued) Order No.: 566131 Your No.: 185601/STARKOVICH LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT (Paragraph 4 of Schedule A continuation) PARCEL A: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY WHICH POINT IS WEST 169.5 FEET AND NORTH 283.5 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 24, TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; • THENCE RUNNING NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE 216.5 FEET; THENCE AT RIGHT ANGLES EASTERLY 109.5 FEET TO A POINT IN THE WESTERLY LINE OF BURNETT STREET, EXTENDED; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF BURNETT STREET EXTENDED 216.5 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY 109.5 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALL OF WHICH LIES BETWEEN THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD AND THE WESTERLY LINE OF BURNETT STREET EXTENDED AND IS PART OF THE ORIGINAL HENRY H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PARCEL B: THE NORTH 62 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: THAT PORTION OF THE HENRY H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM.NO. 37, BEING PARTS OF SECTIONS 17, 18 AND 20 IN TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RNAGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 60 FEET WEST OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 24, TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE SOUTH 16.5 FEET; THENCE WEST 109.5 FEET TO THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE 300 FEET; THENCE EAST 109.5 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 283.5 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CLTACMA6/RDA/0999 :.:. :::::: . .. :CITY OF•.RENTON •. :: . . .... .. ::::. ....: .:':.; '. - •::, :_ ``•< : DEVELOPMENT:SERVICES DIVISION : 1: ...:...... LAND . .... . :.. . .:.. . . . ..:... . .. :.11E PERMIT::: :: ... ..... :. ..:.:.. STER APPL TIO .. : tiy , :::: .:PROPERTY OWNER(S) : I:' ::PROJECT>iNFORMA` rON • Note: If there is more than one le0aI owner, please°attach'an additional nbtariied Master Application for each owner. •,• '" PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: `i kNAME:?HI i- /13 nn • ANO q ) SUTir PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(Sl/LOCATION: f ADDAESS:n ) D� / �� �(/G sW / .Ju�C'N��- �v� 1 • f ' � OA 9 . CITY: Zip: KIN COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUM:: (SI: 14 0007Z - 00 ?3 ro 1 al TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND USEIS}: ' 0200 9cg 7 -- 6 g 5/ v-A-fz%ocrs 0/cJ e r (AI IZ ,r '':APPLIC:AN`T Of:other thalri'owlner}. : ' .: ::, : Y ROPOSED NAME: j3k PopRYIs -Ito c-- PI vl e e ANDLL- e 1.. cnF IZeS!i c/e.-t A— cz O -e_ROIva_ Leu€I 0 Iz P,ra.4._k,v.s COMPANY (if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN M4P DESIc ATION: j ! ADDRESS: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DES NATION (if applicat &), / ?Ae/r/e Ai1=-- -1t3()° . CITY: ZIP: EXISTING ZONING: TELEPHONE NUMBER: r225 9 — 21— /0 ' 70 PROPOSED ZONING {if applicable); , ::.:CONTACT PERSON : , kEkri— SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): i NAME: Sm uT) Y 4 Z Li L{ S ,F, r. 1 COMPANY(if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: • ADDRESS: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIF R PRO TION AREA? /C3VaD AaRrif t,r,.0 Gaff y it-Jo - - N0 I CITY: ZIP: 3GLLC Vu L 9/ Or IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE I ENVIRONMENTALL SENSITIVE AREA? I • Tc!CDLJnI1/4IC Mt IPADCD 4...1 C_Ft.3AII An t CC• NO , • .;: ::::::: ::% >':::::.: :: LEGAL;DESCRIPTI ;OF PROPERTY:(Atta.ch `separate eet if rtecess_: ' } .:: ''I E OF.APPLICAT1ON::& FEES; ;. ;;C:heck'all application types..:that:apply City_Staff.w(Ill •determine .fee•'!, ' • . • ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: 1. —_ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ REZONE $ — LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT ' :i SPECIAL PERMIT $ SHORT PLAT ! TEMPORARY PERMIT $ — TENTATIVE PLAT I _ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT I i SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ ^ FINAL PLAT _yGRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: r ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: ) _ _ PRELIMINARY WAIVER $ _ FINAL _ WETLAND PERMIT $ — ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: _ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ i CONDITIONAL USE $ ' —_ VARIANCE $ _ EXEMPTION $No Charge — ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ' REVISION $ ,. ::_AFFIDAVIT.OF:OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name) , declare that I am (please check one) _the owner of the property involved in thi ,':pplication, _the authorized representative to act for the property owner (please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing state ' is and answers he contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge,land bell:' L, i 0 i. LI P L i4 fV ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to baf aro me, t:Notary 33ublic, in an forte State of (UGaSL Ih1� residirrig`2t•st ` (III- on the ! dsq , (Name of Owne R�resentative) �-- 1 ,[�M , 20r;o riL 4.- A , i (Signature of Owner/R presentative) :it dcf/� '' ignature of No?y Public ' ; , (This section to be completed by City Staff.) : =,, >City;File Number.: : :A :::AAD :: BSP:. :CAP-S CAP-U CPA : CU-.`A::CU '' ECF LLA .::>:MHP.>'F.PUD• `FP"PP R'.RVMP...::SA-A.':S'A=H" SHPL=A: .SHPL-H ';SP . SM .SME. :TP. . .A : V-B V=H TOTAL'FEES:::a...:.:. . TOTAL:POSTAGE PROVIDED:...$ :...: • I I • CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T.A.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A (Continued) Order No.: 566132 Your No.: 185602/PDSX PROPERTIES LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT (Paragraph 4 of Schedule A continuation) THAT PORTION OF THE DONATION LAND CLAIM OF DIANA B. SMITHERS, FAMILY OF DIANA B. TOBIN, A WIDOW, AND THE HEIRS AT LAW OF HENRY H. TOBIN, DECEASED, DESIGNATED AS CLAIM NO. 37 LOCATED IN PARTS OF SECTIONS 17, 18 AND 20 IN TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DEFINED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 60 FEET WEST OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 24 OF THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE SOUTH 16.5 FEET; THENCE WEST 109.5 FEET TO THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY 300 FEET; THENCE EAST 109.5 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 283.5 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE NORTH 62 FEET THEREOF. CLTACMA6/RDA/0999 Construction Mitigation Proposed Construction Dates: Demolition-April 1, 2001;Foundation—August 2001;Project Completion—July 1, 2002. Hours of Operation: 7 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. Proposed Hauling/Transportation Routes: Second Avenue Rainier, left (South)to Interstate 405 or 167. Measures to be implemented to manage dust, traffic and transportation impacts, erosion, mud, noise, and other noxious characteristics: Silt fence, drain rock at construction entrances, weekly street cleaning (Burnett)in front of property. Any specialty hours proposed for construction or hauling? NO current requests for this. Preliminary traffic control plan: Various sub contractors will submit a T.C.P. for approval prior to issuance for necessary permits. t-P��NG `=y THOMASAHARKEY ���G Architects � aQ�O° G �Vf(` et 09 December 15, 2000 ® Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 Re: Project Narrative for Site Plan Approval Submittal for 95 Burnett Project 13400 Northup Way PROJECT LOCATION / EXISTING CONDITIONS Suite 30 Bellevue,WA The proposed 95 Burnett Building is located at 95 Burnett Ave. S. The project site is 98005 bounded by Burnett Avenue South on the east, by a city park and Burnett Place South on the west, by single-family structures and garages to the south and by a T 425.401.6828 multi-family retirement building to the north. The site is currently occupied by the F 425.401.0630 Lande Feed Mill and other small commercial uses in downtown Renton within the Commercial Downtown zone (CD). The site is nearly flat and currently almost completely impervious. All parcels adjacent to the site are also in the CD zone. The site is approximately 56,557sf(1.298 acres). PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The project will include the demolition of the Lande Feed Mill and the other small commercial buildings on the site and the construction of a four-story apartment structure. The first floor of'the building will contain structured parking with 164 stalls. In addition the project will include thinning of trees in the adjacent park and the addition of some hardscape to create pedestrian connections to Burnett Avenue South and to the proposed building lobby area. PARKING Parking will be provided within the structure at the street level. The parking will be broken into two garages. The north garage will have 81 stalls and the south garage will have 83 stalls. There will be an auto court and the main building entry between the two garages. The auto court will be accessed near the center of the site off Burnett Ave. South. 99017_corresp_consult_juris_12-15-00siteplan.doc RESIDENTIAL The upper three levels will be developed as two separate buildings and will contain exclusively residential uses with a total of 118 apartment units. These units are flats ranging in size from 507sf studios to 1053sf two bedroom two bath units. The majority of the units will be one bedroom one bath. A Landscaped courtyard is proposed at the first residential level above the main building entry lobby and common area. The residential floors will be accessed from the lobby which in turn is accessed off the auto court on the east side of the building and the adjacent park on the west side of the building. STREET IMPROVEMENTS Street improvements will be to the centerline of Burnett Avenue South. Along the west side of Burnett Avenue South this will include the construction of curb, gutter and sidewalk and landscape strip. STATISTICS Total lot coverage at grade: 84.5°A° Total area of parking 43,295sf Total area of commercial 4100sf Total area of residential 104,226sf Estimated Construction Cost $5,870,500. Estimated Fair Market Value $11,210,000. Estimated Quantity of Excavation minimal,building contains no basement Average height of building at parapet 42' Sinc rely, Thomas a c •tects Kent Smutny, Project Manager 99017_corresp_consult_juris_12-15-00siteplan.doc THOMASAHARKEY Architects December 18, 2000 ?r` EL PMEN;PLANNING CITY OF RENTON DEC 2 12000 Development Services Division _RECEIVED 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 Re: Response to Attached Housing Design Guidelines for 95 Burnett Project The following is a summary of the Renton Attached Housing Design Guidelines 13400 Northup Way with respective responses as relate to the proposed design: Suite 30 Bellevue,WA A. BUILDING SITING AND DESIGN 98005 T 425.401.6828 1. Pedestrian Building Entries: This standard requires buildings to be orientated to the street with the primary F 425.401.0630 building entrance prominently located on the facade facing the street. The main entry to the proposed apartment building faces Burnett, the primary street that the project faces. The entry is located off a central courtyard and is marked with a canopy and unique, prominent architectural treatment to the elevation at that location. The entire form of the building at this location reinforces the entry architecture. The entry to parking is located off to the sides of the central courtyard. This gets the entries off Burnett and makes them less visible. 2. Transition to Surrounding Development: Careful siting and design treatment is necessary to achieve a compatible transition where new buildings differ from surrounding development in terms of building height,bulk and scale. The proposed development holds the street edge unlike the existing buildings now on the site. The current buildings have parking lots between them and the street edge. To the South of the site are underdeveloped single family lots. To the North is multifamily retirement housing similar in scale to the proposed project. The proposed building is 4 stories, with a maximum height of 50'to the highest ridge. This is much lower than the 95'height limit allowed for this site. In addition the apparent bulk of the project is reduced by breaking the building into two distinct buildings above the first level. Levels 2 through 4 are also set back from the street and further modulated with recesses for decks. . The bulk at the first level is broken by the auto court. 200019_Corr_Consultjuris_12-18-00.doc • • B. PARKING,ACCESS, CIRCULATION 1. Location of Parking: No parking shall be located between a building and the front property line or the street side yard of a corner lot. The proposed building is built to the property line or to within two feet of it on Burnett Avenue. All parking is contained within the building. 2. Design of Surface Parking: NA 1. Structure/Garage Parking: Parking entries should not subordinate pedestrian entries and should not dominate the streetscape. Parking at grade shall be completely enclosed within the building or wholly screened. Parking garages should be architecturally compatible with the residential portion of the building. Garage parking should be secured. The street side of parking in the CD zone should incorporate retail or service commercial, facilities that can be used by the residents or units that have access from the street. The parking garage entry to the project is located away from Burnett at the sides of the auto court thus making it subordinate from the primary pedestrian entry to the project. The parking at grade is enclosed with openings that are in-filled with a screen pattern that will be similar to the residential window pattern above. The residential parking is secured with garage doors. As this site is located outside of the central downtown area North of 2ild commercial space has not been incorporated into the proposed project. 2. Vehicular Access: Parking,garages should be accessed from side streets. Driveways should be located to be visible from the right of way and not impede pedestrian circulation. Minimize the number of driveways and curb-cuts. The parking garage entries are located off the auto court. The curb cut for the auto court is the only curb cut provided for cars in the project. Access to the auto court is off Burnett, the primary street, because there is no secondary street adjacent to the site. 200019_Corr_Consult.Juris_12-18-00.doc 3. Pedestrian Circulation: Developments should include an integrated pedestrian circulation system that connects buildings, open space, and parking areas with the adjacent street sidewalk system. Pedestrian pathways should be delineated separate from vehicle circulation. The entries to the proposed building are located off the auto court and off the adjacent park. The pedestrian circulation from Burnett to the main building entry is defined with textured paving derent from the rest of the auto court. C. LANDSCAPING / RECREATION / COMMON SPACE • 1. Common Open Space Attached housing developments of 10 or more dwelling units shall provide a minimum area of common open space or recreation area equal to 50 square feet per unit. This project consists of 118 dwelling units, which would require 5900sf of open space. The proposed project provides 5000. of open space. We request credit for the remainder of the required open space for providing the proposed improvements noted on the landscape plans to the adjacent park Areas provided include an exercise room, a common gathering .space available to all residents a common terrace at the first residential level and apedestrian connection on the North side of the building that links Burnett Avenue to the adjacent park. The residential level couryard has western and eastern exposure and is surrounded by units thus providing surveillance to the open.space. D. BUILDING ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN 1. Building Character and Massing All building facades shall include modulation or articulation at intervals of no more than 40'. The proposed building utilizes a variety of modulation and articulation. At the street level the building generally follows the front propery line with step backs at several locations. A variey of types of textured CMU will be used on the street front elevations. Walls at the garage area along Burnett are broken up with openings, which contain screen material that is further broken down by steel members, which take on the pattern of the residential windows above. In addition the length of the building on Burnett is broken down by the auto court near the center of the pr ject. Above the street level the building is modulated such that there are no elevations longer than 40'on the street sides. 200019_Corr_Consult.juris_12-18-00.doc . • � f 2. Building Rooflines Building rooflines should be varied by emphasizing dormers, chimneys, stepped roofs, gables,prominent cornice or fascia, or a broken or articulated roofline. Both flat and sloped roofs are used in the project to break down the scale of the building and create the feeling that the project is a city block made up of several d�erent buildings. In addition the sloped portions of the roof on this building are broken up by hip roof forms of various sizes. 3. Building Materials: Building exterior finishes should be durable, of high quality, easily maintained and add visual interest and detail. The base of the building is to be constructed with durable materials, textured CMU and concrete. The upper portions of the building use "lighter"appearing materials, vinyl siding and stucco. Sincerely, Thomas H r ey Architects Kent Smutny,Manager 200019_Corr_Consult.juris_12-18-00.doc • • slionsissessiemminammengionvoRskarrowlimaniiiiimiimmingszossimmuninsii '' .. ... .iegs! N f`IRON. EN' "' L . ECKLI. "' ":.:l an ::::::::::::: ::::: ::: PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write"do not know" or"does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark • designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs),Lt949.terences in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read opflos e,ENFJ4NN! nIG "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. ON DEC 2 . 1 2000 JAN-11-2001 0'3:4E CITY OF RENTON 425 413Lt ?3►i 0 P.03i 12 • ' E ,a,menW d,ecldid A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: r FLAWINGDEV EL(gyp F�r.F_NTON 95 BURNETT APARTMENTS jAa 2 2CC1 2. Name of applicant: PDSK PROPERTIES, INC. RECEIVED 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant: 621 Pacific Ave. #300 Contact; Kent 'Smutriy Tacoma, WA 98402-4611 Thomas Harkey Architects 253-627-4070 425-401-6828 4. Date checklist prepared: December 4, 2000' 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton, Planning Department 8. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing, if applicable): Demolition - May [F2001 Start Foundations - August 2001 Complete Project -- September 2002 7. Do you have any piar�s for future additions, expansion, or further activity elated to or connected with this proposal? If;yes, explain. NONE 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Environmental Associates report dated 2-10-2000, Subsurface sampling & testing. .Geotech Consultants, Inc. report dated 5-28-99, Underground storage tank. ...Attached documents labeled Exhibits A & B: 9, Do you know wheth4 applications are pending for governmental approirais of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. NONE 10. List any govemmentai approvals or permits that will be needed for your oppose!, if known. Site Plan Approval; Demolition, 'Fill & Grade, Building (Permits 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. Three stories of Residential Units totalling 11.8 Units (Avg. Size: over 1 level of Parking at Grade (165 Stalls) with a de tral lobby and motor entrance off of Burnett. The total resident 1 square footage is 89,236 S.F. and the garage is 43,2 S.F. 2 Environmental Checklist 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. See attached legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map submitted in Master Application. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one)•d'rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) Less than 1% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The top foot is brown sand and fine gravel with brown to gray sandy silt at 1 to 2 feet becoming sand below 2 feet. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. The property and the surrounding area is flat. Therefore, unstable soil or soil movement is minimal. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Approximately 18 inches of topsoil will be removed from subject property and filled with capillary break for slab on grade. Import/Export approximately 3,000 yds. each. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Considering the site is flat, erosion, most likely, would not occur. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 90% of the site. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Not Applicable 3 Environmental Checklist - 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any,generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During Demolition - Some dust from razing the existing grainery. During Construction - Emissions from earth moving equipment. During Remainder of Project - Emissions from power tools &.`dust from framin b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. NONE c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Maintain all power tools, equipment, and construction machinery in good working order. 3. WATER a. Surface Water. 1) Is there anySurface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate,state what stream or river it flows into. NONE 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. • No, the Cedar River is over 200 feet to the north. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. NONE 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. NONE 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. NO 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. NONE 4 . Environmental Checklist _ b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. NO 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals..:; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. See attached Soils Reports • c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any(include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so,describe. All roof drains and patio drains will be tite-lined into the storm water system of Renton. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so,generally describe. See attached Soils Reports d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Per C-1 Above. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other ›; evergreen tree:fir, cedar cap other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants:water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Three Pine Trees c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NONE • d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: See attached Landscape Plan 5 JAN-11-200i Erg:47 - `r' OF RENTON 425. 430 ?3EW1 P.07/12 FIRM nmenmr CIMUSt 5. ANIMALS i O a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site wrque known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagi; songbird . other `44 F 44 1, Mammals:deer, bear, elk, beaver, other. 1<, 4c Fish:bass, salmon,trout,herring, shellfish, other ���NOVA ®®, b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NONE c. Is the site part of a migration route'? If so, explain • NO d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: i Not Applicable 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, sole !will be used to meet the completed`project's energy needs? Describe whether it will 1 be used for heating, manufacturing,'etc. Electric - heating, cooking, & lighting i • • b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjs. •nt properties? If so, generally describe. NO c. What kinds of!energy conservation features are included in the pans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy Impacts, f any: The project meets all UBC Codes and builders energy requirements. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposu;' to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could o- ur as a result of this proposal? If so,describe. The proposed project will clean-up the presence of ' contaminants on the north portion of the property. See attache. : documents labeled Exhibits .A & B. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Fire and Health Services 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health haz• i s, if any: Not Applicable • i • ,Environmental Checklist - b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your prcject (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? General automobile traffic noise and airplane. flyovers. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short term - general construction activities and associated noise. Long term - traffic in and out of project. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Short term - construction during normal working hours. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Various older one and two story warehouse and retail buildings. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. The south portion has been a working grainery in years past and most recently used as a pet supply store. c. Describe any structures on the site. Seven older one and two story wood, block, and metal structures. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? Yes, All structures. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? CD f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program c is ignation of the site? Not Applicable h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. NO i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 181 People 7 • Envi'ronmental Checklist j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Living on Site - None. Working out of the various buildings - 12. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Norte Available I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The project will be approved by the City of Renton Planning Dept. which will ensure that the project meets all local and state requirements. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Approximately 118 units at market rate housing. Middle to High Income b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. NONE c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not Applicable '.0. AESTHETICS • a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not ipcluding antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. Tallest height is 57 feet above grade. The main exterior materials are stucco, lap siding, and shingle siding. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Given the fact that 34,495 S.F. in six Buildings varying=:from one to three stories will be demolished, the proposed project will not alter or obstruct any views now enjoyed. . c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Meeting with the City of Renton through the entire design process to meet all requirements and market demands. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The East elevation will be exposed to morning sun and the West elevation to the afternoon sun. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No, the exterior glass will be non-reflective in nature. 8 Environmental Checklist c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? NONE d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: All exterior materials will be earth tones. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Immediately to the west, the Cedar River Trail Park, two blocks to the west,Renton High School with various activities, to the east, JonesPPark on Wells Ave, one block further east, the City Baseball Recreation Center. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,describe. NONE c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunitiesto be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Not Applicable 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,generally describe. NONE • b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. NONE c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not Applicable 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Per the attached Vicinity Map, Site Plan and Downtown Area Map b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes, The nearest transit stop is -at 2nd and Burnett. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Proposed parking - 165 spaces. Number,.eliminated - 20. 9 Environmental Checklist • d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? Yes, the proposed project will require the area in front (East Side) to be improved with curb, gutters, sidewalks and°street trees. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. NO f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Per the attached Traffic Study. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Location of the project is next to or near the Puget Sound Region's major employment area and, we would promote bus usage. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection,health care,schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Given the poor state of the existing structures on the property now, fire service should decrease. However, Police and health care will increase. This project should have little to no impact on schools. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None Available 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service,telephone,sanitary sewer,septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity for lighting and heating; sewer service; phone service; cable service. The sewer main running through the site (East/West) will be relocated to the South. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state th-t to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is.understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might iss in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willf II disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: Urv4 V b 7, Date: tZ 15 -o v 10 . Environmental Checklist D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS �,tha `.l .1 o d: .1. 410 ::0secl.4 6 .eti0rt 1:sl olutn• :< e. 1si pis:<:. >:<: o s>::,: l .s::iffif .. . .:.....�.;:.��$.::s�.::�1. !qr�..y:.:1`?.e..: :::.:::�� :..... .:...:.....:..................... ........................:..:...tl::: ::::lic��:::�::..:Ott............... • Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate . than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly-and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances;or.production of noise? • The only impact from this project will come from additional cars to and from the project. • Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Promote Bus usage and carpools. • 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants,animals,fish,or marine-life? The only impact will be the three trees removed at the NEcorner. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants,animals,fish, or marine life are: - The Landscape Plan will increase the vegitation on the subject site. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Additional demand on the electricity supply. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: The buildings will meet all energy codes. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use 'or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, .historic or cultural sites, wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands? Not Applicable Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Not Applicable 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Not Applicable Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Not Applicable. 11 Environmental Checklist 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s)are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state hat to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is underst• d that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it migh issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentatio' • • -ck full disclosure on my part. • jof Proponent: mi[a111.111111M1V11�`!,..._ Name Printed: tt. Date: , l - t Z(-Do v ENVCHLST.DOC REVISED 6/98 12 • • CITY OF RENTON gFr:JIVFf • rJ • t3U1LDING DIVISION • MEMORANDUM ,�4v��o?OF„cm• wG pal 2000 EcavED DATE: • / '/ 7O TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, Project Planner • FROM: �(1E1;i R 1n�r 1�_J ,, Development Services Division•Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: 9 5 NilLS. LOCATION: 9 PREAPP NO.. vO - /O`' A meeting with the applicant•has been scheduled for t ( C7 4 M , Thursday, g,c2i 6th , in one of the floor conference rooms (new City Hall). If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED .PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11:00 AM meeting. • Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant: You will not need to do a thorough"permit level" review atthis time. Note .only major issues that must be resolved'prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. • Please.submit your written comments to f at least two (2) days before the'rneeting: Thank you. /t,e,"ear- • . 7 14-?-/4-1-i-L--- ette-4,g- . •-• it/6-cr. vieff-4-,----40. • • //,9 • vlJu 1' i ti a ,i.. • • Preapp2 (s-i" CITY OF RENTON 0 c.) vs\ FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM INTO . . DATE: September 20, 2000 TO: Steven Taylor, Senior Planner FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector SUBJECT: Preliminary Comments for 95 Burnett Avenue South Apartments 1 . Preliminary fire flow requirement is 4,500 gpm. Five fire hydrants are required. One within 150-feet and four within 300-feet of the building.. Looped fire mains are required for fire flows in excess of. 2,500 gpm. 2. The fire mitigation fees are applicable at the rate of $388.00 per unit. This fee is payable at the time of building permit issuance. 118 units x $388.00 = $45,784.00 3. Fire sprinkler and fire alarm systems are required as well as an approved standpipe system. Separate plans and permits are required to be submitted to the fire department for review. CT:ct Burn95 CITY OF RENTON MEMO UTILITY REVIEW TO: Steve Taylor FROM: Jan !Dian DATE: September 27, 2000 SUBJECT: PREAPPLICATON REVIEW COMMENTS BURNETT AVE APARTMENTS 95- Burnett Ave S PREAPP NO. 00-104 NOTE ON PRELIMINARY REVIEW COMMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT: The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the. City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers (e.g. Hearing Examiner, Boards of Adjustment, Board of Public Works and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by the City or made by the applicant. WATER • 1. There is an existing 8-inch water main on the east side of Burnett Ave S. and an existing 24-inch main on the west side. 2. All new construction must have a fire hydrant capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 gpm and must be located within 150 feet of the building. A hydrant is required for each 1,000 gpm of required fire flow. There are fire hydrants in the vicinity that may be counted towards the fire protection of this project, but are.subject to verification for being within 300 feet of the nearest corner of the building. 3. Domestic water service will be provided by the 8-inch and fire flow with hydrants will be provided by the 24-inch. 4. The proposed project is located in the 196 water pressure zone and is inside Aquifer Protection Zone I. 5. If the building exceeds 30 feet in height, a backflow device will be required on the domestic water meter. 6. This .project is within the CD zone, therefore the Water System Development Charge (SDC) for multi-family will be assessed at a rate of$0.113 x the total square footage of the site. This is payable at the time the utility permit is issued. Note: A re-development credit will apply for existing water connections. SANITARY SEWER 1. There is an existing 8-inch sewer main in Williams Ave S. 2. This project is within in the CD zone, therefore the Sewer System Development Charge (SDC) for multi-family will be assessed at a rate of$0.078 x the total square footage of the site. This is payable at the time the utility permit is issued. Note: A re-development credit will apply for existing sewer connections. 1 • • 3. If underground parking is proposed and the building department requires floor drains, then floor drains must be connected to the sanitary sewer. An oil water seperator will also be required. 4. If finished floor elevation is below 25 feet, then a backflow device will be.required to be installed. SURFACE WATER 1. There are existing storm facilities in Burnett Ave S. 2. A conceptual drainage plan and drainage report will be required for the site plan.application. The drainage report shall address water detention and water quality treatment in compliance with the requirements of the KCSWM (1990 edition). 3. If impervious surface area does not change then no Surface Water System Development Charges (SDC)will apply. TRANSPORTATION. 1. A traffic study will be required .for this project. The report shall be prepared by a state licensed engineer containing elements and information as identified in the City of Renton "Policy Guidelines for Traffic Impact Analysis of New Development". The traffic study shall include the intersection.of Burnett Ave South and South 2"d Street. 2. Traffic mitigation fee of $75 per additional generated trip (approximately 7 trips per unit) shall be assessed per new unit at a rate per the ITE manual. Credit for existing retail space will be applied. This is payable at the time the building permit is issued. 75x7x 118 3. Full street improvements including, but not limited to paving, sidewalks, curb and gutter,� and storm drain will be,required. tip 5+'re4 hip►oiFtnu ,-, 4. Street lighting will be required. 5. All wire utilities shall.be installed underground per the City of Renton Undergrounding Ordinance. If three or more poles are required to be moved by the development desig all existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground. (No 6fred- kj1iip San) 6. Effective October 22, 2000, new trenching restoration and street overlay requirements will take effect, per Ordinance 4861. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. Cut and capping of existing utilities to existing structures on site will be required as 'part of the demolition permit. 2. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards, which are attached for reference.' Also attached is a copy of the1990 King County Surface Water Standards as adopted by the City of Renton. 3. When approval is granted and utility plans are complete, please submit permit application, three (3) copies of drawings, two (2) copies of the drainage report, and an itemized cost of construction estimate and application fee at the counter on the sixth floor. A fee worksheet is attached for your use, but prior to preparing a check, it is recommended to call 425.430-7266 for a fee estimate as generated by the permit system. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first$100,000 of the estimates construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,000 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half the fee must be paid upon application. 2 RECEIVED SEP 1 9 2000 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING MEMORANDUM DATE: /Z 0 O TO: Long Range Planning FROM: , Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: 9j ( „„717/ Ave S ta-Plm 1.•�S LOCATION: 9 S a(trp)o/L/ A tm PREAPP NO. DO - 1 0f Please review the attached preliminary project plans for consistency with applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies. Please submit your written comments to S-leuVp-/ no later than q/aCY00 . Thank you. We will not be able to include comments received after this date in the presentation/summary we prepare for the applicant. ZviZc� tS JVO-5i&N% 1c`) C VZ( L" Poc„'riz_c)L r,\i , /A-NO Z_07\ri5-67 c-O Nu ;POLICY I SSL:t S , • Rriz- c. preapp • CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: September 28,2000 • TO: Pre-Application File No. 00-104 FROM: Steve Taylor, Senior Planner SUBJECT: 95 Burnett Avenue South.Apartments General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above- referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g.,Hearing Examiner,Zoning Administrator,Board of Adjustment,Board of Public Works, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by.City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for$55,plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall. Development Regulations are also available for review at no charge in the office of the City Clerk on the 7th floor, at.Development Services on the 6th floor and.at the Renton Library. Project Proposal: The subject site consists of three.parcels located in the vicinity of 95 Burnett Avenue South. There are currently three operating business on the site; including the Lande Feed Company,Northwest Pneumatic Electrical Repair and the Purcell Painting& Canber Corp. All buildings would be removed from the site to make way for the proposed apartment building. The proposal is to construct a 118 unit,three-story residential apartment complex over one story of parking. The upper three levels will be developed as two separate buildings with a common area connecting them at the first residential level. The parking level would be partially below grade. Vehicular access to the parking level would be provided from the. southern end of the building onto Burnett Avenue. Zoning: The subject site is designated Center Downtown(CD) on the City's Zoning Map. The intent of the CD zone is to provide high-density residential and mixed use commercial centers serving a regional market as well as adjacent residences. In addition, the subject site is located within the Downtown Core Area and the Urban Center Design Overlay District. Sensitive Areas: Based on the City's Critical Areas Maps, the site is located in a Seismic Hazard Area. The seismic hazard is related to potential liquefaction of soils during an earthquake event. A geotechnical analysis for the site is required. The analysis needs to assess soil conditions and detail construction measures to assure building stability. Pre-App 00-104.doc\ Environmental Issues: Two areas of concern arise with the redevelopment of the site. Certification of an asbestos inspection and abatement of any on site asbestos is required prior to issuance of a demolition permit. Please contact.the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency for a list of certified inspectors and include a copy of the report with the submittal of the demolition permit application. If the demolition of the buildings is processed separately from Site Plan Review for the project, a separate environmental review will be required for this action. The second concern is rodent infestation at the feed store and their displacement into the surrounding community with the demolition of the building. The city has already received reports from adjoining property owners who see an increase in rodent infestation now that the feed store is being cleared out and fear a greater impact once the building is torn down: It is likely that rodent abatement measures will be required prior to demolition. Lande Feed Company is also listed on the King County Historic Resource Inventory and must be disclosed on the SEPA checklist.alblerie Shi/y wonl ire reed) Development Standards: The proposal's compliance with the CD zone development standards and the parking regulations is addressed below: Design—The site is subject to the Urban Center Overlay District Regulations RMC 4-3-100, which are available for$10 at the 6th floor reception desk.. These regulations contain both standards and guidelines that affect architectural issues including siting, design,modulation, common open space, access and parking. Several standards are directly applicable to this project and should be considered thoroughly before a detailed design is finalized. Due to the lack of detail in the material submitted,we are unable to assess compliance in several areas. For example, the amount of common open space/recreation area, landscaping, roof lines and building materials. If need be,the applicant may request a modification from these standards pursuant to RMC section 4-9-100.D. Lot Coverage—For properties located within the Downtown Core Area the standards • regarding maximum lot coverage for buildings are not applicable. Density—The permitted density range in the CD zone is a minimum of 25 dwelling units per acre to a maximum of 100 dwelling units per acre (du/ac). Density may be increased up to 150 duiac subject to approval of an Administrative Conditional Use permit. Net density is calculated after sensitive areas and areas to be dedicated to public right-of-way are deducted from the gross area of the site. There are no sensitive area or public rights-of-way to be deducted from the gross area of the property. The proposal for 118 units on the 56,557 square foot (1.298 acre) lot arrives at a net density of 90.9 du/ac, which is within the density range for the zone. Setbacks/Landscaping—No minimum front yard setbacks are required in the Downtown Core Area; no rear or side yard setbacks required in the CD zone. Although setback requirements do not apply in this instance,the Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations are quite specific regarding siting and design treatments to reduce the bulk and scale of the building. The same applies to landscape requirements. Although on-site landscaping requirements do not apply to properties located within the Downtown Core Area,the design regulations are fairly specific regarding screening and landscaping to reduce visual impact. Pre-App 00-104.doc\ • Height—The CD zone allows a maximum building height of 95 feet. The proposed 4 level building(3%z-stories above grade) appears to be in compliance with this code requirement. Building elevations and detailed descriptions of elements and building materials ate required with your submittal. Screening—Screening must be provided for all surface-mounted and roof top utility and mechanical equipment. In addition, garbage dumpsters and recyclable areas must be screened pursuant to RMC section 4-4-090.C.7. Approval of the proposed locations of dumpster areas by Rainier Waste Management is recommended prior to the submittal of the formal land use application. The site plan application will need to include elevations and details for the proposed methods of screening. Parking=Properties located within the Downtown Core Area are exempt from the requirements of the parking regulations. However, structured parking spaces must comply with the following minimum dimensions for standards and compact stalls: • Standards stalls must have as minimum length of 15 feet(16 feet for 45° or greater) and a minimum width of 8 feet, 4=inches; and, ♦ Compact stalls must have a minimum length of 12 feet (13 feet for 45° or greater) and a minimum width of 7 feet, 6 inches. In addition, compact parking spaces are not allowed to exceed 50% of the parking provided. The plans submitted indicate 170 spaces would be provided with the development. Although the number of compact spaces appears to remain within the 50% limitation, staff was unable to determine the proposal's compliance with the minimum stall dimension requirements based on the information provided. The parking area for the project is also required to comply with the design regulations of the Urban Center Overlay District. Permit Requirements:The proposal would require review of an Administrative Site Plan approval, as well as Environmental(SEPA) Review. .Both reviews would be conducted concurrently in an estimated time frame of 6 to 8 weeks once a complete application is accepted. If any appeals are filed,the timeframe may be extended for an additional 4 to 6 weeks. The application fee would be$1,500.00,plus$0.33 per mailing label required for notification to surrounding property owners within 300 feet of the site. In addition to the required land use permits, separate demolition, construction,building and sign permits would be required. The review of these permits may occur concurrently with the review of the land use permits,but can not be issued prior to the completion of any appeal periods. Impact Mitigation Fees: In addition to the applicable building and construction fees, the following mitigation fees would be required prior to the issuance of building permits. Redevelopment credits for the existing structure would be applied. • A Transportation Mitigation Fee based on$75.00 per new daily trip attributed to the development; • A Parks Mitigation Fee based on$354.51 per new multi-family unit; and, • A Fire Mitigation Fee based on $388.00 per multi-family unit. A handout listing all of the City's Development related fees in attached for your review. Pre-App 00-104.doc\ ( EOTEC [-I May 20, 1999 CONSULTANTS, INC. JN 99132 I 12i1,NI' 201h Street.Suite )G ILIIe uc. \\:\ 9S()05 — 1.125 1 747.5(,I S I::\\ (4251 747-856I Lande Feed Company 95 Burnett Avenue South Renton, Washington 98056 Attention: Craig Lande °EV'I VOFRE oNti,N� Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Study Lande Feed Company Site ®EC 2 1 2000 95 Burnett Avenue South RECEIVED Renton, Washington DearJvir. Lande: We are pleased to present this geotechnical engineering report for the Lande Feed Company site in Renton, Washington. The scope of our work consisted of exploring site surface and subsurface conditions, and then developing this report to provide recommendations for general earthwork and design criteria for foundations, retaining walls, and pavements. You authorized our work by accepting our proposal, P-4849, dated March 22, 1999. The subsurface conditions of the proposed building site were explored with four test borings that encountered loose fill and alluvial soils overlying dense, gravelly sands. Due to the potential for unacceptable settlement if conventional foundations were to be used, we recommend that the building loads be carried on deep foundations. On-grade slabs can be used, but should be reinforced with steel bars to reduce cracking due to differential settlement. Pavement sections should be supported over imported, gravelly structural fill. The on-site soils will not be useable for structural fill, including utility backfill. The attached report contains a discussion of the study and our recommendations. Please contact us if there are any questions regarding this report, or if we can be of further assistance during the depign and construction phases of this project. Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. it,ukt fX4 James R. Finley, P.E. Principal _ ~ter GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Lande Feed Company Site 95 Burnett Avenue South Renton, Washington This report presents the findings and recommendations of our geotechnical engineering study for the Lande Company site in Renton. The Vicinity Map, Plate 1, illustrates the general location of the site. We have not been provided conceptual site plans, however, we were provided with a copy of a King County Assessor map. This map showed the property dimensions and adjoining property bouridaries. Based upon our experience in the immediate area, we anticipate that the site devdlopment could consist of a multi-story apartment building over a main floor occupied by retail space and a parking garage. The main floor would be close to the existing site grades, with no basement planned for the development. SITE CONDITIONS Surface The site is a relatively large, rectangular-shaped parcel situated on the northern portion of downtown Renton. The provided lot map indicates that the property consists of one lot. Burnett Avenue South and a City of Renton Park abut the east and west sides of the property, respectively. The southern and northern adjacent properties are occupied by commercial buildings. The ground surface on the property is relatively flat. At the time of our explorations, the majority of the site was covered with the Lande Feed Mill building, asphalt, or concrete. A narrow, rectangular piece of the property along the western property boundary was vegetated with brambles and low-growing vegetation. A chain-link fence separated the site from the adjoining City of Renton Park. Existing development near the site is a combination of commercial and residential. A house and masonry garage adjoins the southeastern one-half of the site. The garage is built immediately adjacent to the Lande Feed building. The western one-half of the adjoining southern property is a commercial garage, within several feet of the southern boundary. South of this are older residential and commercial buildings. Within several feet of the north boundary of the western one-third of the site is a commercial building that contains Northwest Pneumatic. Subsurface The subsurface conditions were explored by drilling four test borings at the approximate locations shown on the Site Exploration Plan, Plate 2. The field exploration program was based upon our experience with similar projects in the area, the site topography and access, the subsurface conditions revealed during drilling, and on the scope of work outlined in our proposal. The borings were drilled on April 23, 1999, using a trailer-mounted, hollow-stem auger drill for Borings 1 and 2, and a portable, hollow-stem auger drill for Borings 3 and 4. Samples were taken at 5-foot intervals with a standard penetration sampler. This split-spoon sampler, which has a 2- GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Lande Feed Company JN 99132 May 20, 1999 Page 2 inch outside diameter, is driven into the soil with a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to advance the sampler a given distance is an indication of the soil density or consistency. A geotechnical engineer from our staff observed the drilling process, logged the test borings, and obtained representative samples of the soil encountered. The Test Boring Logs are attached as Plates 3 through 6. The four borings encountered 7 to approximately 25 feet of loose, sandy silt and silty sand below the surface cover of concrete, asphalt, or topsoil. These upper soils appear to be a combination of fill and alluvium (river deposits). The geologic maps for Renton indicate that much of the area in the site vicinity has been modified by past grading activities. River channels have meandered through various portions of Renton since the last glaciers receded. Beneath the alluvium and fill, the borings found dense to very dense gravel containing varying amounts of sand and silt. These grrels were revealed to the bottom of the borings. The final logs represent our interpretations of the field logs. The stratification lines on the logs reprsent the approximate boundaries between soil types at the exploration locations. The actual transition between soil types may be gradual, and subsurface conditions can vary between exploration locations. The logs provide specific subsurface information only at the locations tested. The relative densities and moisture descriptions indicated on the test boring logs are interpretive descriptions based on the conditions observed during drilling. Groundwater Groundwater seepage was observed in Borings 1 and 3 at a depth of 7 and 10 feet, respectively. No groundwater was noted in either Borings 2 or 4. The test borings were left open for only a short time period. Therefore, the seepage levels on the logs represent the location of transient water seepage and may not indicate the static groundwater level. It should be noted that groundwater levels vary seasonally with rainfall and other factors. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS General It is our opinion that development of the site is feasible from a geotechnical engineering standpoint. However, since we were not provided with information about proposed redevelopment of the site, and, as depicted on the boring logs, the subsurface conditions are variable, additional subsurface exploration appears warranted following demolition of the existing facilities. The test borings conducted on the site encountered loose fill and alluvium overlying dense gravels. The loose soils are compressible and are potentially liquefiable below the water table. To prevent unacceptable foundation settlement under static building loads, and in the event of a moderate to .large earthquake, we recommend that the building be supported on deep foundations embedded into the dense gravels. Due to the presence of potentially caving near-surface soils and groundwater, it appears that augercast piers are the most suitable deep foundation option. Vibrations from driven piling could potentially damage surrounding structures. Ground improvement methods, such as dynamic compaction or gravel columns, do not appear feasible for this project. • GEOTECH CONSULTANTS.INC. Lande Feed Company JN 99132 May 20, 1999 Page 3 If some differential settlement is allowable in the lowest floor, which will be used primarily for parking, a slab-on-grade could be used. This slab should be reinforced with steel bars to limit the potential for excessive cracking. Number 4 rebar at 18-inch centers placed both horizontal and vertical in the slab are typically sufficient. Wherever possible, the slab should be isolated from the pier-supported walls and columns. An exception to this is where interior and exterior slabs lead up to doorways. At these locations, the slab's reinforcement should be tied in to the pier-supported foundation. This lessens the chance that a sharp downset (i.e_, a trip hazard) will form at the door threshold. Areas of soft subgrade soils should be excavated beneath slabs and replaced with structural fill. As evidenced by the settlement and relatively poor performance of many pavements in the surrounding area, the near-surface loose soils do not provide good subgrade support. Gravelly structural fill should be provided beneath pavement sections to improve their performance. The near-surface soils are generally silts, which are unsuitable for reuse as structural fill due to theiLsensitivity to moisture. Utility backfill and other structural fill will need to be imported in order for proper compaction to be achieved. The moisture-sensitive soils will be susceptible to disturbance under equipment and foot traffic, particularly when they are wet. Quarry spans or a similar gravelly material should be used to construct access roads and working pads where heavy equipment traffic is expected. Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be allowed to review the final development plans to verify that the recommendations presented in this report are adequately addressed in the design. Such a plan review would be additional work beyond the current scope of work for this study, and it may include revisions to our recommendations to accommodate site, development, and geotechnical constraints that become more evident during the review process. • Augercast Concrete Piers Acigercast piers are installed using continuous flight, hollow-stem auger equipment. Concrete grout must be pumped continuously through the auger as it is withdrawn. We recommend that augercast piers be installed by an experienced contractor who is familiar with the anticipated subsurface cpnditions. An allowable compressive capacity of 50 tons can be attained by installing a 16-inch diameter, augercast concrete pier at least 10 feet into dense strata. For transient loading, such as wind or seismic loads, the allowable pier capacity may be increased by one-third. We can provide design criteria for different pier diameters and embedment lengths, if greater capacities are required. The minimum center-to-center pier spacing should be three times the pier diameter. Based on our test boring information, we estimate that pier lengths of about 25 to 40 feet will be required to achieve adequate penetration into the bearing soil. We estimate that the total settlement of single piers installed as described above will be on the order of one-half inch. Most of this settlement should occur during the construction phase as the dead loads are applied. The remaining post-construction settlement would be realized as the live- loads are applied. We estimate that differential settlements over any portion of the structure should be less than about one-quarter inch. • GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. . Lande Feed Company JN 99132 May 20, 1999 Page 4 We recommend reinforcing each pier its entire length. This typically consists of a rebar cage extending a portion of the pier's length with a full-length center-bar. Each pier can be assumed to have a point of fixity at 10 feet below the ground surface for the computation of lateral load resistance. The loose soil against the piers can be assumed to have a design passive earth resistance of 100 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) acting on two times the pier diameter. This relatively low passive pressure is intended to account for the potential that some soil liquefaction could occur adjacent to piers during an earthquake. Passive earth pressures on the grade beams will also provide some lateral resistance. If structural fill is placed against the outside of the grade beams, the design passive earth pressure from the fill can be assumed to be equal to that pressure exerted by an equivalent fluid with a density of 200 pcf. Seismic Considerations The site is located within Seismic Zone 3, as illustrated on Figure No. 16-2 of the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC). In accordance with Table 16-J of the 1997 UBC, the site soil profile is best represented by Profile Type SE (Soft Soil). The loose soils beneath the water table are susceptible to seismic liquefaction during a moderate to large earthquake. On-grade elements, such as slabs and pavements, would likely undergo significant differential settlement where liquefaction occurs. The use of deep foundations to support the building should prevent catastrophic foundation settlement that could result from seismic liquefaction. Slabs-on-Grade The subgrade soil beneath on-grade slabs must be in a firm, non-yielding condition at the time of slab construction or underslab fill placement. Any soft areas encountered should be excavated and replaced with select, imported structural fill. The use of reinforcing steel is recommended to reduce the potential for differential slab settlement and cracking. All slabs-on-grade should be underlain by a capillary break or drainage layer consisting of a minimum 4-inch thickness of coarse, free-draining structural fill with a gradation similar to that discussed later in Permanent Foundation and Retaining Walls. In areas where the passage of rnloisture through the slab is undesirable, a vapor barrier, such as a 6-mil plastic membrane, should be placed beneath the slab. Additionally, sand could be used in the fine-grading process to reduce damage to the vapor barrier, to provide uniform support under the slab, and to reduce shrinkage cracking by improving the concrete curing process. Permanent Foundation and Retaining Walls Retaining walls backfilled on only one side should be designed to resist the lateral earth pressures imposed by the soil they retain. The following recommended design parameters are for walls that restrain level backfill: • GEOTECH CONSULTANTS.INC. 1,4 Lance reed company • May 20. 1999 Page 5 Parameter Design Value Active Earth Pressure' 40 pcf Soil Unit Weight 130 pcf Where: 1. pcf is pounds per cubic foot. 2. Active earth pressures are computed using the equivalent fluid densities. • For a restrained wall that cannot deflect at least • 0.002 times its height, a uniform lateral pressure equal to 10 psf times the height of the wall should be added to the above active equivalent fluid pressure. The values given above are to be used to design permanent foundation and retaining walls only. The passive pressure given is appropriate for the depth of level, structural fill placed in front of a retaining or foundation wall only. We recommend a safety factor of at least 1.5 for overturning and sliding, when using the above values to design the walls. The design values given above do not include the effects of any hydrostatic pressures behind the walls and assume that no surcharge slopes or loads, such as vehicles, will be placed behind the walls. If these conditions exist, those pressures should be added to the above lateral soil pressures. Also, if sloping backfill is desired behind the walls, we will need to be given the wall dimensions and the slope of the backfill in order to provide the appropriate design earth pressures. Heavy construction equipment should not be operated behind retaining and foundation walls within a distance equal to the height of a wall, unless the walls are designed for the additional lateral pressures resulting from the equipment. The wall design criteria assume that the backfill will be well-compacted in lifts no thicker than 12 inches. The compaction of backfill near the walls should be;accomplished with hand-operated equipment to,prevent the walls from being overloaded by the higher soil forces that occur during compaction. I Retaining Wall Backfill Backfill placed behind retaining or foundation walls should be coarse, free-draining, structural fill containing no organics. This backfill should contain no more than 5 percent silt or clay particles and have no gravel greater than 4 inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the No. 4 sieve should be between 25 and 70 percent. The near-surface soils are not free-draining. The purpose of these backfill requirements is to ensure that the design criteria for a retaining wall are not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. The top 12 to 18 inches of the backfill should consist of a compacted, relatively impermeable soil or topsoil, or the surface should be paved. The ground surface must also slope away from backfilled walls to reduce the potential for surface water to percolate into the backfill. The sub-section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill contains recommendations regarding the placement and compaction of structural fill behind retaining and foundation walls. The above recommendations are not intended to waterproof the GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. • Land!? Feed Company JN 99132 May 20, 1999 Page 6 below-grade walls. If some seepage through the walls or moist conditions are not acceptable, waterproofing should be provided. This typically includes limiting cold-joints and wall penetrations, and using bentonite panels or membranes on the outside of the walls. Applying a thin coat of asphalt emulsion is not considered waterproofing, but it will only help to prevent moisture, generated from water vapor or capillary action, from seeping through the concrete. Excavations and Slopes Excavation slopes should not exceed the limits specified in local, state, and national government safety regulations. Temporary cuts to a depth of about 4 feet may be attempted vertically in unsaturated soil, if there are no indications of slope instability. Based upon Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 296, Part N, the soil type above the groundwater table would be classified as Type C. Therefore, temporary cut slopes cannot be excavated at an inclination steeper than 1.5:1 (Horizontal:Vertical), extending continuously between the top and the bottom of a cut. Temporary excavations that encounter caving soils or seepage will need to be shored and may require dewatering. The above-recommended temporary slope inclination is based on what has been successful at other sites With similar soil conditions. Temporary cuts are those that will remain unsupported for a relatively short duration to allow for the construction of foundations, retaining walls, or utilities. Temporary cut slopes should be protected with plastic sheeting during wet weather. The cut slopes should also be backfilled or retained as soon as possible to reduce the potential for instability. Please note that loose soil can cave suddenly and without warning. Utility contractors should be made especially aWare of this potential danger. Drainage Considerations 1/Ye recommend the use of footing drains at the base of footings, where (1) crawl spaces or basements will be below a structure, (2) a slab is below the outside grade, or (3) the outside grade does not slope downward from a building. Drains should also be placed at the base of all blackfilled, earth-retaining walls. These drains should be surrounded by at least 6 inches of 1-inch- minus, washed rock and then wrapped in non-woven, geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or similar material). At its highest point, a perforated pipe invert should be at least as low as the bottom of the footing, and it should be sloped for drainage. Drainage should also be provided inside the footprint of a structure, where (1) a crawl space will slope or be lower than the surrounding ground surface, (2) an excavation encounters significant seepage, or (3) an excavation for a building will be close to the expected high groundwater elevations. We can provide recommendations for interior drains, should they become necessary, during excavation and foundation construction. All roof and surface water drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system. A typical drain detail is attached to this report as Plate 7. For the best long-term performance, perforated PVC pipe is recommended for all subsurface drains. • GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. . . f Lande Feed Company JN 99132 May 20, 1999 Page 7 Groundwater was observed during our field work. If seepage is encountered in an excavation, it should be drained from the site by directing it through drainage ditches, perforated pipe, or French drains, or by pumping it from sumps interconnected by shallow connector trenches at the bottom of the excavation. The excavation and site should be graded so that surface water is directed off the site and away from the tops of slopes. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where foundations, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. Final site grading in areas adjacent to buildings should slope away at least 2 percent, except where the area is paved. Pavement Areas Al! pavement sections should be supported over at least 8 inches of imported, gravelly structural fill. Additional structural fill or fabric may be needed to stabilize soft, wet, or unstable areas. We recommend using Supac SNP, manufactured by Phillips Petroleum Company, or a non-woven fabric with equivalent strength and permeability characteristics. In most instances where unstable subgrade conditions are encountered, 12 inches of granular structural fill will stabilize the subgrade, except for very soft areas where additional fill could be required. The subgrade should be evaluated by Geotech Consultants, Inc., after the site is stripped and cut to grade. Recommendations for the compaction of structural fill beneath pavements are given in a later sub- section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill. The performance of site pavements is directly related to the strength and stability of the underlying subgrade. The pavement section for lightly-loaded traffic and parking areas should consist of 2 inches of asphalt concrete (AC) over 4 inches of crushed rock base (CRB) or 3 inches of asphalt-treated base (ATB). We recommend providing heavily-loaded areas with 3 inches of AC over 6 inches of CRB or 4 inches of ATB. Heavily-loaded areas are typically main driveways, dumpster sites, or areas with truck traffic. The City of Renton may have additional requirements for pavement improvements in city right-of-ways. The pavement section recommendations and guidelines presented in this report are based on our experience in the area and on what has been successful in similar situations. Some maintenance apd repair of limited areas can be expected. To provide for a design without the need for any repair would be uneconomical. General Earthwork and Structural Fill • All building and pavement areas should be stripped of surface vegetation, topsoil, organic soil, and other deleterious material. The stripped or removed materials should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural fill, but they could be used in non-structural areas, such as landscape beds. Structural fill is defined as any fill placed under a building, behind permanent retaining or foundation walls, or in other areas where the underlying soil needs to support loads. All structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts with a moisture content at, or near, the optimum moisture content. The optimum moisture content is that moisture content that results in the greatest compacted dry • GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Lande Feed Company JN 99132 May 20. 1999 Page 8 density. The moisture content of fill is very important and must be closely controlled during the filling'and compaction process. The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material type selected, the compaction equipment used, and the number of passes made to compact the lift. The loose lift thickness should not exceed 12 inches. We recommend testing the fill as it is placed. If the fill is not compacted to specifications, it can be recompacted before another lift is placed. This eliminates the need to remove the fill to achieve the required compaction. The following table presents recommended relative compactions for structural fill: • Minimum Location of Fill Placement Relative Compaction Beneath footings, slabs, 95% or walkways Behind retaining walls 90% Beneath pavements 95% for upper 12 inches of subgrade, 90% below that level Where: Minimum Relative Compaction is the ratio, expressed in percentages, of the compacted dry density to the maximum dry density, as determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D 1557-78 (Modified Proctor). LIMITATIONS The analyses, conclusions, and recommendations contained in this report are based on site conditions as they existed at the time of our exploration and assume that the soil encountered in the test borings is representative of subsurface conditions on the site. If the subsurface conditions encountered during construction are significantly different from those observed in our explorations, we should be advised at once so that we can review these conditions and reconsider our recommendations where necessary. Unanticipated soil conditions are commonly encountered on construction sites and cannot be fully anticipated by merely taking soil samples in test borings. SUbsurface conditions can also vary between exploration locations. Such unexpected conditions frequently require making additional expenditures to attain a properly constructed project. It is recommended that the owner consider providing a contingency fund to accommodate such potential extra costs and risks. This is a standard recommendation for all projects. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Lande Feed Company, and its representatives, for specific application to this project and site. Our recommendations and conclusions are based on observed site materials, and selective laboratory testing and engineering analyses. Our conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in accordance with current standards of practice within the scope of our services and within budget and time constraints. No warranty is expressed or implied. The scope of our services does not include services related to construction safety precautions, and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. We recommend including this report, in its entirety, in the project contract documents so the contractor may be aware of our findings. • GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. • Lande Feed Company JN 99132 May 2O, 1999 Page 9 ADDITIONAL SERVICES In addition to reviewing the final plans, Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be retained to provide geotechnical consultation, testing, and observation services during construction. This is to confirm that subsurface conditions are consistent with those indicated by our exploration, to evaluate whether earthwork and foundation construction activities comply with the general intent of the recommendations presented in this report, and to provide suggestions for design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. However, our work would not include the supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor and its employees or agents. Also, job arid site safety, and dimensional measurements, will be the responsibility of the contractor. Thl following plates are attached to complete this report: Plate 1 Vicinity Map Plate 2 Site Exploration Plan • Plates 3 - 6 Test Boring Logs Plate 7 Footing Drain Detail We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. If you have any questions, or if we may be of further service, please do not hesitate to contact us. Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC , •• :e, v w S,o tv A L.ECG 5/ok LEXPIRES 8117l?q I James R. Finley, P.E. Principal TAJ/JRF:alt • GEOTECH CONSULTANTS.INC. ------- . • ' ... ' e' ,/ `NJ •. - .. . --1- • . 7- . 1• ) . ' • !-.•..:-:-:•:-:•:-.-:-:-:•:.--•. . ' tega ; .4Ir ( \ ' .'t...:%_:Z'::.:Z":":':::::' '1 '''. 1 F-1 TON', ... ---- --:--------1' '..--''-----!'-'1- - ' --'7 ,\...:•.; -_.:-.,.... . 1 0 . 1 A R 'ORT ‘• ' 1 1 !. 1 w ( 1 I.s::‘1; \ 0 , • `,.....-'• , , • / i , 9 • 1 •:•:•,• .. ....... I:. 4.• .,... • ,L ,____,,.._-__. i•;.::•::.:•••::: ' ti •'7 %1* -, • : . -.._-., ... .. i \ .. „ \ ... • .•:•-.•:. il ,a \ ' ; "1 . ' 1 ----:•_,--7,— pil - n \ I , . 1,, i , . • \\ . , • _j_1_2;• , - II 1 1 :. BM / ..' 4 , )\thletic ra.' 0.. ?— • I • ... ., Li_i . • ,;. ... i \ ,..:- ,\(„ 0 1 • .. , • ,. , -. 0. . _ • - ,1J/) . 7...•, vi......_,....,..c....„' ..._7... 7•_ El..I, ..c._1, i '.e i II / .r "•a"lt<.et s I .1/4,„ ., .-I • • I ••:-.-.., - . • c • _ I--,--____ r (--c ) . ..or . aseb.41r: .1 . . .ssi . --\ C-3.: •• ? - • : • Irtv,,.'' V ! ••••ja .1...„„It... .. • (/!) • :: . ..... . ,..\-;::•,.. • , . ,.- ,:.: er. 4 • \ 0 .! • • -...-- . : .. 18 v., , .r.,,,I7: . ,. i•••• ."1 / — c - - 1 (.10) •-•::.. 1 ../.::::-.f-i:-1,-.1.-:•,........_•.-- .„, ., 7—, p •,i..------;--.-.:. . ••• 4 . - .. . •0•00.1ffie 7+ 1 •ij ' ,Htlit Ardilli91:7 ll . >"'--- iti4 --.7--=". -":".....''' •••..:". ° . ••1 '''''....". °I'. v \ s..:-. •. •.la '• \ N.. ..•-•- - .." ill ( .1•• PIK , •-•-.•2\--\ .,. 0 IP .- Al' \./ . , • . • , 00 .<7. --- •„- 0..,-/A-, . .• . ‘. \ .0 ; ,.... ,\\\. ....... „, • .. .• i (...:::.. •,., \ \., \ck;:t :. -......'1. ri J.,.....::.----i-• ...i IN '' F•1-d ,....-- ' ..- .,•• , \\-.4.::...........:7 •. V '‘•-•- '24`A... • • \ --•,.... ••.. • ... .- 1 1 !I • // -•.. .. .r \ -:'.•:''' \ ‘• *• .• al „....:".;....:".--ii I 10 : • • . ••• . t• 1 • I.• • ./.--\ t.. / ...„..• .._.:::;)_,__ 1---,-..--,4: —, . ( 1 :' ;:, / •- ... -\., '-_,„,,-\ , I .. . - .- • , , ! ..... -.L.,- r-.-•::::•:A— it . . 1 ,. j. 1 • -•• bat ,,, 1 . i •: , \- .. . . , , I , .. :' / • •-•,.. ,, • i• i° \ ' , 1• : . .' I --!I . ‘'' IA • ‘..C..: .1\ . .r4.!. f-73______tL-..,...•••--. Ar LEGEND: il CONTOUR INTERVAL:25 FEET SCALE:1- t,000' _.Z-- ---s-L. (SOURCE:USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OF TI-IE RENTON QUADRANGLE,WA. 1949,PHOTOREVISED 1968&1973) • VICINITY MAP • ''... I G E O T E C H 95 Burnett Avenue South • CONSULTANTS, INC. Renton, Washington i., A Job No: Date: Plate: 1 99132 May 1999 • . , '• . . .sf17.":":,i,'-re-1--r.f):.:,•••.•.: z;',1- . j4:cf,:iLii-175: ".,. .,,r^..'-111.-% Western Pneumatic 7- .c .. , , t;.. -- -.e./4-d-..fr-Li;;;tc•-•,,i4..1 77 Burnett Avenue South L•:.:•••..51 t,f,f'Kt,'..:::21.2l,A.. .f:.."'.••'•;;./. ^ alIZYTI.,:).•:2.4'PtIVI ,'!" `..4,,,..,44:.,...$;,•...71.7.;..1.7,-:.4-,.....;C:ter•-•,,,•••••,..g.,.•••,•.....,•,.............•..•..•..:.„ %L-v r-••••As tf-. ..r. 1....:'V..••••.-1,.. I: ,,,4, -r ...,,2,- • ,,• ...e,../ ....0-,• ;::I ''•?,"4•7!".17-1;::,-.:;; •..e•-.4$4•:,---1- ) '•:-7`-:.:.'•,. ",--4;!:!-• :i lis_erd;i3,_,'. . i-,,,..•-•e:n..4-.;:i •..,...,,, •,..,-,,-. 1.... ..--,i-•',,,- c •.2,4-.r-.0 co-0 pi.-11-1 I :,:,.i'.••'....-•0- .„.;.,,rf5ri S'.h1:•7,:ii:01 -1(• -i-t.-e,,;_.,:?••"-.;!r'7),Ji 1 1-.4.1-',!.....• C-e-r.p,_,-:-... .c 474;:.44.ijtOk:-Cr-'42 r o ..c al .c -.' '• i" s A.ir, U) ill 44 >"' ra;7.,)^1: a''4:1)1!:*21;:5'' terd 0 0 a.) 41-?: .;;;-.., :di::,,:......! • .„.?,..... 4) = n ?P'1"1:-.!, ,?::::t'-f' 3 133, !, c B2iSs !:,: :1- Cl) co r "-/•i':.-- 5-•;;;Tr 0. /.ctil U- (..) :I. (1) 0 1 ...../!..:i'-"Y Q..ejzAl.:::.LP-s,,,, , ...„. ii -•(74 +,.l.-1'...w'r.'VI,` •!n-e..?-:• c cn %.,-....,•-•,;;:‘...,k'... 7!re4; , I .1:?:::::'."5.1':`'''', c.-21:14:444...- C Z a) • 423 La L_ ',.- ..,( 3 E C > cc < > `r-;.::•-• •:'::.1-.;;T-;f6-';',57:4:.' = : . : < 4 "' = r.....'i....,-.V..•-v•-',0,,'16~,..tat,....;;;_tr, cr) f C .4:ii%,,.•-T t*:Z.17‘F:'..;;;K$',./L: L. C r...'C:'''','.".1./11) :i4t•'•-•-o- = 0 .. :-.4.:‘,/-.5..cri•,u.,,,,. -)A.f.c.v. .4-, •-,,:,,'r..--tIttzi 71,4"-A :.' :.'1; ca 'a ',` "•‘ - r-,-le, nr - ' . -.:l• C 0 i.4,1,:rri.r:Alr.:..,"•1!r,'-‘-yriji friZR5r :-34.: , 1 f ...:":::*r ',•:::: .: )- a) If:1'-i;0 7.-1 er.r.1,4••••, 0 •,.^.1' Fi:4?..-, 4‘,5,:t. c : ' ;':,i;!::,:::i. o LC7 O. -,,,7=....„.7,rre,'.'I..r-4tf,-f,:;'1 4•I-;..:Hi.:.7•.-e),'.k9",...?.,,;T„.:41..;.1.-,..-.1!..-,.1!.-.;,..,....-,-(4.v!:"01,:.P.-.4 3•,•"4r,v-r4-..V-.!3.)i7:.l.1 .„,.71 McL 0 .e13 B!!,.l .c 14 : e 1'S4 .:...:„ : asonry Build ing $•ii (garage) ° ijr- :</i .4,;..r.-,..... . 101 Bumett Ave.S. .,il...:*.f„.4•.: 5 4....:4,:•-i 1.-.4. .. 2 • , 7;PVI• Garage v 4 i *.,'..._:,4:.:1)• Burnett Place S. ' House ,. ti...:F,•,..,;?,,.../... 103 Burnett Ave.S i:3;-•:",.."01 , . ,:•.'!"-^..<2 LEGEND: N 4 Approximate Location of Boring Made by ° B' Geotech Consultants,Inc.April 1999 '4Fq..c Trees,grass, or brambles Concrete or Asphalt —•—•• Approximate property line • ' NOT TO SCALE SITE EXPLORATION PLAN ei G EOTECH 95 Burnett Avenue South ..1 CONSULTANTS, INC. .i, Renton, Washington -I, k .---- --- Job No: Date: - -Plate: 99132 May 1999 2 • 00_ _,JVKINV 1 $ cF `, S �y`Cr \o-o-b`� `°�Q� o-�`4 5G Description FILL Asphalt over brown SAND with tine gravel, moist, loose (FILL) 2 1 [I Brown to gray, sandy SILT, moist, soft 4 2 - becomes more sandy ... d ,13 3 gp Brown SAND, slightly oxidized, with trace of silt, fine-to medium-grained, f ! I moist, medium dense 23 4 .[I 1 Brown, gravelly, SAND, fine-to coarse-grained, wet, medium dense SW 5 — 20 5 F �I - becomes more gravelly 11 6 LI ML Grayish-brown SILT with fine sand, wet, stiff 1111 5 — 21 7 i ;�• Brown, silty GRAVEL with sand, fine-to coarse-grained, wet, medium-dense 41 8 • - becomes dense 0 -- * Test boring was terminated at 29 feet during drilling on April 23, 1999. 1 * Groundwater seepage was encountered during drilling at 10 feet. 5 -- t 0 — • BORING LOG .4, G E O T E C H 95 Burnett Avenue South CONSULTANTS, INC_ Renton, Washington _ _ Job No: date: Logged b1y: Plate: �✓�— 99132 May1999 TA 3 [7Vft111‘.7 `s,c ,zG °� `� �y.A S�o-3 <2) Q So-�Q JG, Description FILL 2" asphalt over 6" concrete over brown, silty SAND with some gravel, damp, loose (FILL) 11 1 Brown SILT with sand and gravel, moist, soft • ML 4 • Brown, sandy GRAVEL to gravelly SAND, moist, dense •lGP(. 0 -- 23 2 a. .• No sample • ' Brown, sandy GRAVEL with trace of silt, fine-to coarse-grained, moist, I — 58 3 • G very dense 20 * Test boring was terminated at 16.5 feet during drilling on April 23, 1999. * No groundwater seepage was encountered during drilling. 25 --. • 30 3 I 40 -- • BORING LOG •;,14# GE O T E C H 95 Burnett Avenue South CONSULTANTS, INC. Renton, Washington Job No: Date: - Logged by: Plate: 99132 May 1999 TA 4 40�� t�OKIN(iS `z 5•c) \;o- o`g,g`� ' ` �t 1Q G� Description o- Brown organic topsoil over SM Brown, silty SAND, fine-grained, trace of organics, moist, loose 4 1 L i ML •I Brownish gray with orange mottling, SILT with sand, very moist, soft _ I 2 2 IL SIN Gray, silty SAND, fine-grained, wet, very loose M 5 3 SP - becomes less silty I 0 -- 1 _ 10 4 [1 ML Gray, sandy SILT with organic layers, occasional gravel, wet, stiff II 5 -- ; 8 5 { SP ? Brown SAND with trace of silt, fine- to medium-grained, wet, loose ,0 - becomes gray 5 6 LiI Gray, sandy SILT with thin organic layers, wet, loose ML II - becomes hard 15 `— 50/6" 7 (3ray, sandy GRAVEL with trace of silt, wet, very dense * Test boring was terndnated at 26 feet during drilling on April 23, 1999. 30 — * Groundwater seepage was encountered at 6 feet during drillin 35 _ I 40— BORING LOG `�• G E 0 T E C H 95 Burnett Avenue South CONSULTANTS, INC. \ Renton, Washington Job No: Date: Logged by: Plate: 99132 May 1999 TAI 5 • zt Jg 4 o°� %Jf\11V V '+ e`' va�O.13 g\ 4 � \)SG Description Brown, fine sand (Top Solt) over FILL brown to orange, silty SAND with gravel, moist, loose (FILL) L r • ML Brown SILT to silty SAND, with some gravel, moist, loose 3 1 ~ - becomes gravelly 31 2 SP Brown, gravelly SAND, medium- to coarse-grained, moist, dense 44 * Test boring was terminated at 12 feet during drilling on April 23, 1999. * No groundwater seepage was encountered during drilling. ir-- L- I ) -- BORING LOG GE0TEC� ti 95 Burnett Avenue South CONSULTANTS, INC. Renton, Washington 1 __ Job No: Date: Logged by: Plate: 99132 May 1999 TAI 6 ii Slope backfi/1 away from foundation. ONTLINE ROOF DRAIN Q Do not conned /b !OO/In drain. TI I BACKFILL See text fornts VAPOR�- BARRIER requirements. SLAB WASHED ROCK ;. .,� • ram- --�-.`, SAND/GAVEL NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILE ' FILTER FABRIC 4"PERFORATED HARD PVC PIPE Invert al leas/ as low as fooling and/or crawl space. Slope /o drain. Place weep/vies downward. • FOOTING DRAIN DETAIL • G E O T E C H 95 Burnett Avenue South CONSULTANTS, INC. Renton, Washington Job No: Date: Plate: 99132 May 1999 7 • . ortant Iuformatioo A p aout Your __Geotechnical Engineering Report Subsurface problems.are a principal cause of construction delays,cost overruns, claims,and disputes. • The following information is provided to help younanage your risks. • Geotechnical Services Are Performed for • elevation, configuration, location, orientation, or Specific Purposes, Persons, and Projects weight of the proposed structure, Geotechnical engineers structure their services to meet the spe • composition of the design team, or cific •needs of their clients.A geotechnical engineering study con • project ownership. ducted for a civil engineer may not fulfill the needs of a construc- Asa general rule, always inform your geotechnical engineer Lion contractor or even another civil engineer. Because each geot ethnical engineering study is unique, each geotechnical engi- neering of project changes ven minor ones—and request an veering report is unique, prepared solely for the client. No one assessment of their impact. Geotechnical engineers cannot except you should rely on your geotechnical engineering report accept responsibility or liability for problems that occur because their reports do not consider developments of which without first conferring with the geotechnical engineer who pre- pared it. And no one—not even you—should apply the report for they were not informed. any purpose or project except the one originally contemplated. Subsurface Conditions Can Change A Geotechnical Engineering Report Is Based on A geotechnical engineering report is based on conditions that existed at the time the study was performed. Do not rely on a A Unique Set of Project-Specific Factors geotechnical engineering report whose adequacy may have Geotechnical engineers consider a number of unique,project-spe- been affected by: the passage of time; by man-made events, cific factors when establishing the scope of a study.Typical factors such as construction on or adjacent to the site; or by natural include: the client's goals, objectives, and risk management pref- events, such as floods, earthquakes, or groundwater fluctua- erencesG the general nature of the structure involved,its size,and tions. Always contact the geotechnical engineer before apply- configuration; the location of the structure on the site; and other ing the report to determine if it is still reliable.A minor amount planned or existing site improvements, such as access roads, of additional testing or analysis could prevent major problems. parking lots, and underground utilities. Unless the geotechnical engineer who conducted the study specifically indicates other Most Geotechnical Findings Are wise, do not rely on a geotechnical engineering report that was: • not prepared for you, Professional Opinions • not prepared for your project, Site exploration identifies subsurface conditions only at those • not prepared for the specific site explored, or points where subsurface tests are conducted or samples are • completed before important project changes were made. taken. Geotechnical engineers review field and laboratory data and then apply their professional judgment to render an opinion Typical changes that can erode the reliability of an existing about subsurface conditions throughout the site. Actual sub geotechnical engineering report include those that affect: surface conditions may differ—sometimes significantly—from • the function of the proposed structure, as when those indicated in your report. Retaining the geotechnical engi- it's changed from a parking garage to an office neer who developed your report to provide construction obser- building, or from a light industrial plant to a vation is the most effective method of managing the risks asso- refrigerated warehouse, dated with unanticipated conditions. . v ' A Report's Recommendations Are Not Final reports acc:,racv is limited; encourage them to confer with the I . Do not overrely on the construction recommendations included • geotechnical erglneer who prepared the report (a modest fee In your report. Those recommendations are not final, because may be required} and/or to conduct additional study to obtain geotechnical engineers develop them principally from judgment the specific types of information they need or prefer. A prebid and opinion. Geotechnical engineers can finalize their recom conference caa also be valuable. Be sure contractors have suffi mendations only by observing actual subsurface conditions dent time to perform additional study. Only then might you be in revealed during construction. The geotechnical engineer who a position to give contractors the best information available to developed your report cannot assume responsibility or liability for you,while requiring them to at least share some of the financial the report's recommendations if that engineer does not perform responsibilities stemming from unanticipated conditions. construction observation. Read Responsibility Provisions Closely A Geotechnical Engineering Report Is Subject Some clients, design professionals, and contractors do not recognize that geotechnical engineering is far less exact than To Misinterpretation other engineering disciplines. This lack of understanding has Other design team members'misinterpretation of geotechnical created unrealistic expectations that have led to disappoint- engineering reports has resulted in costly problems. Lower ments, claims, and disputes.To help reduce such risks, geot- that risk by having your geotechnical engineer confer with echnical engineers commonly include a variety of explanatory appro hate members of the design team after submitting the provisions in their reports. Sometimes labeled "limitations", repor . Also retain your geotechnical engineer to review perti- many of these provisions indicate where geotechnical engi- i nent elements of the design team's plans and specifications. neers responsibilities begin and end, to help others recognize Contractors can also misinterpret a geotechnical engineering their own responsibilities and risks. Read these provisions report. Reduce that risk by having your geotechnical engineer closely. Ask questions. Your geotechnical engineer should participate in prebid and preconstruction conferences, and by respond fully and frankly. providing construction observation. Geoenvironmental Concerns Are Not Covered Do Not Redraw the Engineer's Logs The equipment, techniques, and personnel used to perform a Geotechnical engineers prepare final boring and testing logs geoenvironmental study differ significantly from those used to ' based upon their interpretation of field logs and laboratory perform a geotechnical study. For that reason, a geotechnical data. To prevent errors or omissions, the logs included in a engineering report does not usually relate any geoenvironmen- geotechnical engineering report should never be redrawn for tal findings, conclusions, or recommendations; e.g., about the inclusion in architectural or other design drawings. Only photo- likelihood of encountering underground storage tanks or regu- graphic or electronic reproduction is acceptable, but recognize lated contaminants. Unanticipated environmental problems have that separating logs from the report can elevate risk. led to numerous project failures. If you have not yet obtained your own geoenvironmental information, ask your geotechnical Give Contractors a Complete consultant for risk management guidance. Do not rely on an Report and Guidance Some environmental report prepared for someone else. lowners and design professionals mistakenly believe they Rely on Your Geotechnical Engineer for can make contractors liable for unanticipated subsurface condi- tions by limiting what they provide for bid preparation. To help Additional Assistance prevelit costly problems,give contractors the complete geotech- Membership in ASFE exposes geotechnical engineers to a wide nical engineering report, but preface it with a clearly written let- array of risk management techniques that can be of genuine ben- ter of transmittal. In that letter,advise contractors that the report efit for everyone involved with a construction project.Confer with was not prepared for purposes of bid development and that the your ASFE-member geotechnical engineer for more information. L PROFESSIONAL . ASFE FIRMS PRACTICING IN THE GEOSCIENCES 8811 Colesville Road Suite G106 Silver Spring, MD 20910 Telephone: 301-565-2733 Facsimile: 301-589-2017 email: info@asfe.org www.asfe.org Copyright 1998 by ASFE.Inc.Unless ASFE grants written permission to do so,duplication of this document by any means whatsoever Is expressly prohibited. Re use of the wording in this document.In whole or In part,also is expressly prohibited,and may be done only with the express permission of ASFE or for purposes of review or scholarly research. 11GER06983.5M - ..____44/11/00 14:00 FAX 2066284727- UNIT 7/12 . Z 003i 00: r. 0 CHICAGO TITLE.INSUR.ANCE COMPANY _ . E #1800,SEATTLE,WA 98104 PHONE: (206)628-4727 701 FIFTH AVENUE, FAX: (206)62S-4725 • ORDER NO: 000566/32 YOUR NO: 185602IPDSKPROPERTIES UNIT NO: 12 LOAN NO: DEVELOP M CI OFE ENTpAjNING ®EC 2 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT #2 2000 - RECEIVE' ® ORDER REFE •R%•ENCE . I NFORMAT I ON • SUPPLEMENTAL NUMBER a. SELLER: PHILIP M. LANDE PURCHASER/BORROWER: PDSK PROPERTIES, INC. LOAN NUMBER: PROPERTY ADDRESS: WASHINGToN Our Title Commitment dated 02/02/00 at 8:00 A.M. is supplemented as follows: PARAGRAPH NUMBER(S) 1 OF OUR COMMITMENT IS (ARE) ELIMINATED. EXCEPT AS TO THE MATTERS SET FORTH HEREINABOVE, THE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY COVERED BY THIS ORDER HAS NOT BEEN REEXAMINED. MARCH 21, 2000 AUTHORIZED BY: LINDA JACKSON • • • • • • CHICAGO '1'11' INSURANCE COMPANY S..)1X -C/k 701 FIFTH AVENUE,#1800,SEATTLE,WA 98104 Order No.: 000566132 PROPERTY ADDRESS: WASHINGTON Your No.: 185602/PDSK PROPERTIES • PDSK PROPERTIES INC 621 PACIFIC AVENUE#300 1 PACIFIC BLDG TACOMA,WASHINGTON 98402 ATTN: 1/1 Enclosed are your materials on the above transaction. If you have any questions regarding these materials, please contact us. Thank you for this opportunity to serve you. ««««««««««««««««««<»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» 1 rfLE UNIT 12 TELEPHONE:(206)628-4727 FAX:(206)628-4725 LINDA JACKSON SENIOR 1'1'1LE OFFICER AND UNIT MANAGER (E-MAIL:JACKSONL@CTT.COM) ANDREA BUDNICK TITLE OFFICER (E-MAIL:BUDNICKA@CTT.COM) PAUL STARIHA 11'1LE OFFICER (E-MAIL:STARIHAP@CTT.COM) SHARLEEN LAMBARD TITLE TECHNICIAN • • ' ._: ' . =�". !:=.ei--,..,..--A.---,-:?.-A,- =h,-. ���$: �yt :, = .,3 % . ia . . ' �'rj Si'si.-",-?....--,,, .4�_��. � .��'d'^ �c :.:_� . ` - — � - .- ` F rP. COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SOlikg Y g ig ka 4 11, CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY .y S :h CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Missouri corporation, herein called the Company, for a valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor '^ ▪ of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges therefore; all subject to the r4 provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Exclusions from Coverage (appearing herein) and to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof. fsii - This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or Ct policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the time of the issuance r, C of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement. zaw • This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and ✓ obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six months after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is `` not the fault of the Company. y .r In Witness Whereof, CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused this commitment to be signed and sealed r as of the date of policy shown in Schedule A, the policy to become valid when countersigned by an authorized signatory. . inn i x- So: u- .y. Issued by: t �� CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY :, 1800 Columbia Center By: , 701 Fifth Avenue 9 ,f. Seattle, Washington 98104 t `"S, su—..�'� (206) 628 -5666 o:f.R?°'1+r o ��- �—t� , cv;-, , `� t3 President Ui'"sr, a IT. • yj , 4't':1 11:6)'‘AMetAlaa/ i t'i Secretary h. e? . EH- I'�: ter„ y-_���--�o- � ..� ..y =� �T�_ a�: ��,_ :,.Ti •�,,^..o--__.. - �• CPT GO TITLE INSURANCE C "PANY • - • .,;.FIFTH AVENUE,#1800,SEATTLE,WA 9810,., A.L.TA.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Title Unit: U-12 Phone: (206)628-4727 Fax: (206)628-4726 Order No.: 566132 Officer: LINDA,ANDREA,&PAUL Your No.: 185602/PDSK PROPERTIES Commitment Effective Date: FEBRUARY 2,2000 at 8:00 A.M. 1. Policy or Policies to be issued: ALTA Owner's Policy Amount: $55 0,0 0 0.0 0 1992 STANDARD Premium: $1.,525.00 GENERAL SCHEDULE RATE T $ 131.15 . Proposed Insured: PDSK PROPERTIES, INC. , A WASHINGTON CORPORATION Policy or Policies to be issued: Amount: $0.0 0 ALTA Loan Policy Premium: Tax: Proposed Insured: Policy or Policies to be issued: Amount: $0.0 0 ALTA Loan Policy Premium: Tax: • Proposed Insured: 2. The estate or interest in the land which is covered by this Commitment is: FEE SIMPLE 3. Title to the estate or interest in the land is at the effective date hereof vested in: PHILIP MAITLAND LANDE, AS HIS SEPARATE ESTATE • • 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT • • CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T.A.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 566132 Your No.: 1S560s/PDSx PROPERTIES SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS YEAR: 2000 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 000720-0073-01 LEVY CODE: 2100 ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: $ 182,400.00 ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: $ 42,100.00 GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: BILLED: $ 2,910.31 PAID: $ 0.00 UNPAID: $ 2,910.31 NOTE: IF THE TAX AMOUNT IS NOT EVENLY DIVISIBLE INTO TWO PAYMENTS, KING COUNTY WILL REQUIRE THE HALF PAYMENT BE ROUNDED UP TO THE NEXT CENT. FAILURE TO ROUND UP THE HALF PAYMENT MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF THE TAX PAYMENT BY THE COUNTY. s 5. TITLE IS TO VEST IN PDSK PROPERTIES, INC. , AND WILL THEN BE SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING MATTERS SHOWN AT PARAGRAPH(S) 6. F 6. THE PROPOSED DEED OF TRUST OR MORTGAGE MUST BE AUTHORIZED BY RESOLUTION OF THE DIRECTORS OF PDSK PROPERTIES, INC. AND A COPY SUBMITTED. r NOTE 1: EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1997, DOCUMENT FORMAT AND CONTENT REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN IMPOSED BY WASHINGTON LAW. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF THE DOCUMENT BY THE COUNTY RECORDER. FIRST PAGE OR COVER SHEET: 3" TOP MARGIN CONTAINING NOTHING EXCEPT THE RETURN ADDRESS. 1" SIDE AND BOTTOM MARGINS CONTAINING NO MARKINGS OR SEALS. TITLE(S) OF DOCUMENTS. • RECORDING NO. OF ANY ASSIGNED, RELEASED OR REFERENCED DOCUMENT(S) . GRANTORS NAMES (AND PAGE NO. WHERE ADDITIONAL NAMES CAN BE FOUND) . GRANTEES NAMES (AND PAGE NO. WHERE ADDITIONAL NAMES CAN BE FOUND) . ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION (AND PAGE NO. FOR FULL DESCRIPTION) . ASSESSOR'S TAX PARCEL NUMBER(S) . RETURN ADDRESS (IN TOP 3" MARGIN) . **A COVER SHEET CAN BE ATTACHED CONTAINING THE ABOVE FORMAT AND DATA IF THE FIRST PAGE DOES NOT CONTAIN ALL REQUIRED DATA. CLTACMB2/RDA/0999 Y _ • • • • CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 566232 Your No.: 1856s/PDSX PROPERTIES 00 SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS ADDITIONAL PAGES: 1" TOP, SIDE AND BOTTOM MARGINS CONTAINING NO MARKINGS OR SEALS. ALL PAGES: • NO STAPLED OR TAPED ATTACHMENTS. EACH ATTACHMENT MUST BE A SEPARATE PAGE. ALL NOTARY AND OTHER PRESSURE SEALS MUST BE SMUDGED FOR VISIBILITY. ' FONT SIZE OF 8 POINTS OR LARGER. THE FOLLOWING MAY BE USED AS AN ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE DOCUMENTS TO BE RECORDED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF RCW 65.04. SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WHICH MUST ALSO APPEAR IN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT: PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18-23-5. END OF SCHEDULE B CLTACM82/RDA/0999 0 CHICAGO '1'ITL.._ .SURANCE COMPANY 1800 COLUMBIA CENTER, 701 5TH AVE (206) 628-5666 IMPORTANT: This is not a Survey. It is furnished as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon with reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. ..J - • - - r --- /DI.5 . Lo a a co 0 . n n b •a - -,Q- -0 5 -7b. J .ST . a a //3 %o I h n I Ni "i /o9S, N N __ N 1 N yI S. '1 -- .4 N. /'T11 h LI Q0 IA M h � 4 N 4 J ti P 1 r '— ,..,. W a aC+ , ]a�'65 I ,a'/G Dre"4.\ ,oQs" �� '` ' ,/5 I 5' ti / 414 fr ?Z, ZZ f U •--- v. 1v /8 * r 11 _► I - �r 14 15 h � "i5' 7 I • ' i . • CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A (Continued) Order No.: 566132 Your No.: 185602/PDSK PROPERTIES LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT (Paragraph 4 of Schedule A continuation) THAT PORTION OF THE DONATION LAND CLAIM OF DIANA B. SMITHERS, FAMILY OF DIANA B. TOBIN, A WIDOW, AND THE HEIRS AT LAW OF HENRY H. TOBIN, DECEASED, DESIGNATED AS CLAIM NO. 37 LOCATED IN PARTS OF SECTIONS 17, 18 AND 20 IN TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DEFINED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 60 FEET WEST OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 24 OF THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE SOUTH 16.5 FEET; THENCE WEST 109.5 FEET TO THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY 300 FEET; THENCE EAST 109.5 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 283.5 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE NORTH 62 FEET THEREOF. CLTACMA6/RDA/0999 r . 4 • J _ • • • CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B • Order No.: 566132 Your No.: 185602/PDSx PROPERTIES Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the catisfaction of the Company. GENERAL EXCEPTIONS A. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. B. Encroachments,overlaps,boundary line disputes,or other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises. C. Easements,or claims of easements,not shown by the public records. D. Any lien,or right to a lien,for contributions to employee benefit funds,or for state workers' compensation,or for services,labor,or material heretofore or hereafter furnished,all as imposed by law,and not shown by the public records. E. Taxes or special assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the public records. F. Any service,installation,connection,maintenance,tap,capacity or construction charges for sewer,water, electricity,other utilities,or garbage collection and disposal. G.Reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; Indian tribal codes or regulations,Indian treaty or aboriginal rights,including easements or equitable servitudes. H. Water rights,claims,or title to water. I. Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims or other matters,if any,created,first appearing in the public records,or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS FOLLOW Wf T•rn►•o/on•1tnm A . ►., • • • CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T.A.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 000566132 Your No.: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS A 3. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITI S THEREO • P OSE: RAILROAD SPUR K AREA FECTED: A WESTERLY PORTION SAID PREMISES AND OTHER PROPERTY RECORDED: MAY 3, 1922 RECORDING 1612621 • B 2 . PAYMENT OF THE REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX, IF REQUIRED. THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SITUATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF LOCAL TAXING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF RENTON. PRESENT RATE IS 1.78%. ANY CONVEYANCE DOCUMENT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY THE OFFICIAL WASHINGTON STATE EXCISE TAX AFFIDAVIT. THE APPLICABLE EXCISE TAX MUST BE PAID AND THE AFFIDAVIT APPROVED AT THE TIME OF THE RECORDING OF THE .CONVEYANCE DOCUMENTS. c 3. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQ1 UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE AND PENALTIES) : YEAR: 1999 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 000720-0073-01 LEVY CODE: 2100 ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: $ 182,400.00 ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: $ 42,100.00 GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: BILLED: $ 3,001.90 PAID: $ 0.00 UNPAID: $ 3,001.90 • D 4. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES) : CLTACMB1/RDA/0999 • EXCLUSIONS (Cont'd.) 4. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the Insured the estate or interest insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (i) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (ii) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. • ALTA LOAN POLICY FORM (10-17-92) The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation(including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii)the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separa- tion in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encum- brance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by(a)above,except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy,but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy(except to the extent that this policy insures the priority of the lien of the insured mortgage over any statutory lien for services, labor or material); or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness,to comply with applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. 6. Any statutory lien for services, labor or materials (or the claim or priority of any statutory lien for services, labor or materials over the lien of the insured mortgage)arising from an improvement or work related to the land which is con- tracted for and commenced subsequent to Date of Policy and is not financed in whole or in part by proceeds of the • indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage which at Date of Policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to' advance. 7. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction creating the interest of the mortgagee insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (i) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (ii) the subordination of the interest of the insured mortgagee as a result of the application of the doctrine of equitable subordination; or (iii) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. •- CHICAGO TITLE• URANCE COMPANY 2601 SOUTH 35TH STREW-; SUITE 100, TACOMA, WASHINGTON`,409 (253) 474-2377 FAX: (253) 475-4351 RECEIVED February 14, 2000 FEB 15 LOOS PDSK PROPERTIES, INC. 621 PACIFIC AVENUE #300 TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98402-4611 RE: EscrowNo.: 000185601 Title Order No: 0 001856 01 Seller: RUDY STARKOVICH and BEVERLY STARKOVICH Purchaser: PDSK PROPERTIES, INC. Property: PARCEL NOS 000720007509 & 000720014802, WASHINGTON Dear Paul Krakow In connection with the above referenced transaction,you will find enclosed the following: . Preliminary Title Commitment If you have any questions regarding the enclosures or any further instructions please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Yours truly, CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY tv- CYNTHIA L. FOLEY - EXT. 618 or Renee Tippen " Enclosures • - -�� .-', - 'ii.fie- :_ -~ _%-,,. -0:o,.-.a w t. .:2:V . '-;=ram'%.„-`-"-:K'''' '. _ _ `` `.` C +c I COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE Et A is It iJ.• 1'f !N. I ` CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY y. t 1r CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Missouri corporation, herein called the Company, for a valuable 1,. consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor I of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the `` ti land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges therefore; all subject to the Fr^ >a, provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Exclusions from Coverage (appearing herein) and to the Conditions and '. Stipulations hereof. 4 h; This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the time of the issuance -r: " of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement. This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six months after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies h. committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is 5 not the fault of the Company. In Witness Whereof;CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused this commitment to be signed and sealed `s as of the date of policy shown in Schedule A, the policy to become valid when countersigned by an authorized : e= signatory. . 41, K . Issued by: CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY By: 1800 Columbia Center _ A 701 Fifth Avenue ,tsurN. e. Seattle, Washington 98104 ` � c_ 9 '` ii (206) 628 - 5666 ,-, �3 ?F \3. 4, < _� b President ti SLA - By: r,, tv+JitillAA F:I '?. Secretary r• 1u:l S I ; • h. .RI z r Ai '°' 711 -.'-i-''� - irr.• -c.`L -.67-s- T£'S ri.'+?�'c �.�'� .. - ->a'� >u.. ter.. •ap .'ai:`.o-.F ';y i'''.t3�� •. • ••• Ch GO TITLE INSURANCE C ?ANY • v .ivi FIFTH AVENUE,#1800,SEATTLE,WA 98104%-- A.L.T.A.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A • Title Unit: U-12 Phone: (206)628-4727 Fax: �(206)628-4726 --r- _ Order No.: 566131 Officer: • LINDA,ANDREA,&PAUL • Your No.:18560I/STARKOVICH Commitment Effective Date: FEBRUARY 3,2000 at 8:00 A.M. 1. Policy or Policies to be issued: PREMIUM APPLICABLE BETWEEN S620,001.00-630,000.00 ALTA Owner's Policy Amount: $6 2 5,0 0 0.0 0 1992 STANDARD Premium: $1,517.00 NON-RESIDENTIAL PRIOR POLICY RATE Tax $ 130.46 Proposed Insured: PDSK PROPERTIES, INC. Policy or Policies to be issued: Amount: $0.00 ALTA Loan Policy Premium: 1992 EXTENDED Tax: SIMULTANEOUS LOAN RATE Proposed Insured: Policy or Policies to be issued: Amount: $0.00 ALTA Loan Policy Premium: Tax: Proposed Insured: 2 . The estate or interest in the land which is covered by this Commitment is: FEE SIMPLE 3. Title to the estate or interest in the land is at the effective date hereof vested in: RUDY J. STARKOVICH AND BEVERLY J. STARKOVICH, HUSBAND AND WIFE 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT • CHICAGO ITILE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T.A.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A •: - , —,(Continued) . - - Order No.: 566131 Your No.: 185601/STARKOVICH LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT (Paragraph 4 of Schedule A continuation) PARCEL A: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY WHICH POINT IS WEST 169.5 FEET AND NORTH 283.5 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 24, TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE RUNNING NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE 216.5 FEET; THENCE AT RIGHT ANGLES EASTERLY 109.5 FEET TO A POINT IN THE WESTERLY LINE OF BURNETT STREET, EXTENDED; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF BURNETT STREET EXTENDED 216.5 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY 109.5 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALL OF. WHICH LIES BETWEEN THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD AND THE WESTERLY LINE OF BURNETT STREET EXTENDED AND IS PART OF THE ORIGINAL HENRY H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PARCEL B: THE NORTH 62 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: THAT PORTION OF THE HENRY H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37, BEING PARTS OF SECTIONS 17, 18 AND 20 IN TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RNAGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 60 FEET WEST OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 24, TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE SOUTH 16.5 FEET; THENCE WEST 109.5 FEET TO THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE 300 FEET; THENCE EAST 109.5 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 283.5 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CLTACMA6/RDA/0999 • CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA.COMMITMENT • .'i -SCHEDULE B Order No:: 566131 Your No.: 185601/STARKOVICH Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. GENERAL EXCEPTIONS A. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. B. Encroachments,overlaps,boundary line disputes,or other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises. C. Easements,or claims of easements,not shown by the public records. D.Any lien,or right to a lien,for contributions to employee benefit funds,or for state workers' compensation,or for services,labor,or material heretofore or hereafter furnished,all as imposed by law,and not shown by the public records. E. Taxes or special assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the public records. F. Any service,installation,connection,maintenance,tap,capacity or construction charges for sewer,water, electricity,other utilities,or garbage collection and disposal. G.Reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; Indian tribal codes or regulations,Indian treaty or aboriginal rights,including easements or equitable servitudes. H. Water rights,claims,or title to water. I. Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims or other matters,if any,created,first appearing in the public records,or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS FOLLOW CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B •': - . —(Continued) • - - - Order No.: 000566131 Your No.: 185601/STARKOVICH SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS A 1. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: PURPOSE: RAILROAD SPUR TRACK AREA AFFECTED: A WESTERLY PORTION OF SAID PREMISES AND OTHER PROPERTY RECORDED: MAY 3, 1922 RECORDING NUMBER: 1612621 a 2. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION PURPOSE: UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATION LINES AND APPURTENANCES AREA AFFECTED: THE NORTH 8 FEET OF PARCEL A RECORDED: AUGUST 28, 1978 RECORDING NUMBER: 7808281038 c 3. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: CITY OF RENTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION PURPOSE: PUBLIC UTILITIES (SEWER) WITH NECESSARY APPURTENANCES AREA AFFECTED: . A SOUTHERLY PORTION OF PARCEL A LYING WITHIN A STRIP OF LAND 15 FEET IN WIDTH RECORDED: JUNE 1, 1984 RECORDING NUMBER: 8406010541 4. EXCEPTIONS AND RESERVATIONS CONTAINED IN DEED: FROM: STANDARD OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, A DELAWARE CORPORATION RECORDED: JULY 14, 1976 RECORDING NUMBER: 7607140468 • CLTACMB1/FDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B .•i - • -'(Continued) - - - - Order No.:. 5 6 6131 Your No.: 185601/STARKOVICH SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS AFFECTS: PARCEL A 5. PAYMENT OF THE REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX, IF REQUIRED. THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SITUATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF LOCAL TAXING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF RENTON. PRESENT RATE IS 1.78%. ANY CONVEYANCE DOCUMENT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY THE OFFICIAL WASHINGTON STATE EXCISE TAX AFFIDAVIT. THE APPLICABLE EXCISE TAX MUST BE PAID AND THE AFFIDAVIT APPROVED AT THE TIME OF THE RECORDING OF THE CONVEYANCE DOCUMENTS. 6. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE 'INTEREST AND PENALTIES) : YEAR: 2000 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 000720-0075-09 LEVY CODE: 2100 ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: $ 165,900.00 ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: $ 11,900 .00 GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: BILLED: $ 2,306.15 PAID: $ .00 UNPAID: $ 2,306.15 NOTE: IF THE TAX AMOUNT IS NOT EVENLY DIVISIBLE INTO TWO PAYMENTS, KING COUNTY WILL REQUIRE THE HALF PAYMENT BE ROUNDED UP TO THE NEXT CENT. FAILURE TO ROUND UP THE HALF PAYMENT MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF THE TAX PAYMENT BY THE COUNTY. 0 AFFECTS: PARCEL A p 7. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES) : • CLTACMB2/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T.A.COMMITMENT • SCHEDULE B . --(Continued) - . _ Order No.: 566131 Your No.: 185601/STARKOVICH SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS YEAR: 2000 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 000720-0148-02 LEVY CODE: 2100 ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: $ 47,500.00 ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: $ 31,300.00 GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: BILLED: $ 1,025.29 PAID: $ .00 UNPAID: $ 1,025.29 NOTE: IF THE TAX AMOUNT IS NOT EVENLY DIVISIBLE INTO TWO PAYMENTS, KING COUNTY WILL REQUIRE THE HALF PAYMENT BE ROUNDED UP TO THE NEXT CENT. FAILURE TO ROUND UP THE HALF PAYMENT MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF THE TAX PAYMENT BY THE COUNTY. x AFFECTS: PARCEL B i 8. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: RUDY J. STARKOVICH AND BEVERLY J. STARKOVICH, HUSBAND AND WIFE TRUSTEE: PIONEER NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION BENEFICIARY: STANDARD OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, A DELAWARE CORPORATION AMOUNT: $ 30,730.00 DATED: JULY 14, 1976 RECORDED: JULY 14, 1976 RECORDING NUMBER: 7607140469 LOAN NUMBER: N/A THE AMOUNT NOW SECURED BY SAID DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS UPON WHICH THE SAME CAN BE DISCHARGED OR ASSUMED SHOULD BE ASCERTAINED FROM THE HOLDER OF THE INDEBTEDNESS SECURED. J AFFECTS: PARCEL A CLTACMB2/RDA/0999 • CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B •i - , --(Cbntinued) Order No.: 5 6 6131 Your No.: 185601/STARKOVICH SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS 9. THE PROPOSED DEED OF TRUST OR MORTGAGE MUST BE AUTHORIZED BY RESOLUTION OF THE DIRECTORS OF PDSK PROPERTIES, INC AND A COPY SUBMITTED. 10. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN THIS COMMITMENT IS BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED WITH THE APPLICATION AND THE PUBLIC RECORDS AS DEFINED IN THE POLICY TO ISSUE. THE PARTIES TO THE FORTHCOMING TRANSACTION MUST NOTIFY THE TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PRIOR TO CLOSING IF THE DESCRIPTION DOES NOT CONFORM TO THEIR EXPECTATIONS. m 11. TO PROVIDE AN EXTENDED COVERAGE LENDER'S POLICY GENERAL EXCEPTIONS A THROUGH D WILL BE CONSIDERED WHEN OUR INSPECTION AND/OR REVIEW OF SURVEY, IF REQUIRED, IS COMPLETED. A SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT WILL FOLLOW. x NOTE 1: EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1997, DOCUMENT FORMAT AND CONTENT REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN IMPOSED BY WASHINGTON LAW. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF THE DOCUMENT BY THE COUNTY RECORDER. FIRST PAGE OR COVER SHEET: 3" TOP MARGIN CONTAINING NOTHING EXCEPT THE RETURN ADDRESS. 1" SIDE AN70 BOTTOM MARGINS CONTAINING NO MARKINGS OR SEALS. TITLE(S) OF DOCUMENTS. RECORDING NO. OF ANY ASSIGNED, RELEASED OR REFERENCED DOCUMENT(S) . GRANTORS NAMES (AND PAGE NO. WHERE ADDITIONAL NAMES CAN BE FOUND) . GRANTEES NAMES (AND PAGE NO. WHERE ADDITIONAL NAMES CAN BE FOUND) . ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION (AND PAGE NO. FOR FULL DESCRIPTION) . ASSESSOR'S TAX PARCEL NUMBER(S) . RETURN ADDRESS (IN TOP 3" MARGIN) . **A COVER SHEET CAN BE ATTACHED CONTAINING THE ABOVE FORMAT AND DATA IF THE FIRST PAGE DOES NOT CONTAIN ALL REQUIRED DATA. ADDITIONAL PAGES: 1" TOP, SIDE AND BOTTOM MARGINS CONTAINING NO MARKINGS OR SEALS. ALL PAGES: NO STAPLED OR TAPED ATTACHMENTS. EACH ATTACHMENT MUST BE A SEPARATE PAGE. ALL NOTARY AND OTHER PRESSURE SEALS MUST BE SMUDGED FOR VISIBILITY. FONT SIZE OF 8 POINTS OR LARGER. CLTACMB2/RDA/D999 i + CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B •i - (Continued) • • - Order No.: 566131 Your No.: 18 5 6 01/STARKOVICH SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS THE FOLLOWING MAY BE USED AS AN ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE DOCUMENTS TO BE RECORDED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF RCW 65.04. SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WHICH MUST ALSO APPEAR IN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT: PORTION OF HENRY H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37. END OF SCHEDULE B • CLTACMB2/RDA/0999 s 0 -CHICAGO TITLE 1SIJRANCE COMPANY 1800 COLUMBIA CENTER, 701 5TH AVE, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 IMPORTANT: This is not a Survey. It is furnished as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon with reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. - _ _ - \--\e-IN I�ti . 1 o�p1 �1 stor,g4-1an c..kcc, p.,) 1V o , 2) . �Cfi" -j0n 11 IlL'i , 1 o - a 3 - 5 , i c) . I • '":1 ..E- '";°2- ____a_le_ w 493 /0,.51010. ��a 54 04 3 q P , '�°o e t �,331,4. aT 0¢ G' �o® a D•'( D. /4 ° 1 w Q490 . 0 rro •i,.' 1ST N . S T. Q v !Iasi � 4 d ti S1 O O\ J 1 e3 6 ni 23iSAr 04 isso/,6s 5. Ro70 - C. 4 SS'o•+?_lyE�7Ciirtl 09 8 d;.a_') y ai P� w N r ` 90 S °oltao 1 m. it.u, ~17 Amu 6p_ls d f•----- " 6 t i N 10 - - II 11 t5P W �. S v a O '. '10 Li lie i Z T/s - _ � � N a >) b ei yrs ,I • - 61Q < b Q I on f7sliop\\j X79 oS la 58519 ••o 6 ' 10 �'-1454. 020 ' g2760f- • I I- 9r. / 90 La•787° O 4g450o _ 1oz55 / - /per Dios 13 - • .� C ,�, l�b �ro ® �� 025 g4°Q , Or2I$ ( !o ullFr . ��a. o t(N. 8 - y _ 4. ��' to C. ice, t , pIV ..e - _ op4 / \ ',3221 I a9 �~ p lit �❑ I I° \ "O.fib b!/' a ` 0 J orts� 6 b ozss i� 0225 I : 5 ZLf j /` EXCLUSIONS (Cont'd.) _ 41' Any claim, which arises out oftrre transaction vesting in the Insured the estate vl interest insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (i) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (ii) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. • ALTA LOAN POLICY FORM (10-17-92) The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation(including but not limited to building and zoning laws,ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i)the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii)the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separa- tion in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encum- brance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by(a)above,except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (except to the extent that this policy insures the priority of the lien of the insured mortgage over any statutory lien for services, labor or material); or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness,to comply with applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. 6. Any statutory lien for services, labor or materials (or the claim or priority of any statutory lien for services, labor or • materials over the lien of the insured mortgage)arising from an improvement or work related to the land which is con- tracted for and commenced subsequent to Date of Policy and is not financed in whole or in part by proceeds of the indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage which at Date of Policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to. advance. 7. Any claim,which arises out of the transaction creating the interest of the mortgagee insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (i) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (ii) the subordination of the interest of the insured mortgagee as a result of the application of the doctrine of equitable subordination; or (iii) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. PREVCO LLC '4;7253 627 4049 12/19/00 13: 0 eil :03/04 NO:092 1.2, 18,-On 11: 17 FAX 2u66244172S - UNIT 7/32 f iijitiliz .__ . . 1 . 0 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 701 MTH AVENUE, #1800,SEA WA 98104 PH( i4E (206)628-4727 Fl (206)628-4725 • i 1 • ORDER NO 0C65.:132 YOUR NO: 1'...11,/PDSK FROPERT1E$ UNIT NO: 12. LOAN NO: ; ;• t-- --.:''''itiiir Y Opti,tiztiN 4frONAIING SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT 462 i 1 46-c 2 f ^ i 4 I ago - 1-.-• - 0,9e,rot,f..7 -H-4". 6-TiE frED oxpl6li REFBRERCE INFORMA , ON SUPPLEMT?-,, JTAL NUMBEIRi 'I 1 SELLERT . PHILIP M. LANCE . . PURCHASER/11ORROWER: PEISK PROPERTXES, INC. 1 i LOAN NUM8ERt , PROPERTY ADDRE0S: ' . WASHINGTON I : 1 • • • . • . . • . I our TiliPt Commitm4lt datO 02/U2/OO rat 6:00 A.M. ia aupp flent.Cd an tollows I 1 . . PARAGRAPH NUMtER(6): 1 OF 0.1.7R COMMITMENT is (ARFO ELIMINATE . • ! EXCRPT AS TO TUE MATTERS klET FORTH IlmWEZNAZQVI-.1, THE O THE PROPERTY COVE R= BY THIS OlipER HAS NOT EEEN REEXAMTNED . • . . 1 • MARCH 21, 2000 AuTH0RIZED Ey! LINUA JACKSON ) 1 I . , ,T.„ _ _ , i r7 r- •--.:\ tv..17P.7.7,-.. - - i :_ ---:-.1) ..., , i , . PREVCO LLC 47253 627 4049 12/19/00 13: 0 N :04/04 NO:092 12- 1i3/00 11;16 FAX 2(166284725 __UNIT____ -7:12 --... gj 1.10 5 . .... __ .... . - -- . _ ._....... . L . . • • • *, .. 1.) CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY I . 701 Firm AVENU5, v4elPf00,SEATTLE,WA 98.to4 PHOO, (206)6284727 F (206)628-4725 • ORDER NO: 000561.6r YOUR NO: 185 1 STARKOVICI4 UNIT NO: 12 LOAN NO: I I : . SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT #3 :. _. . . GRAZE litspitizzocv INFORMATION f SUPPLEMENTAL NUMDRP -1 SELLER: RUDY STARKOVic7H AND BF.7 RC? STARKOVICH, HUSE+ MO R1VB PURCHASER/BORROWERt• MCI< PROPERTIES, INC • LOAN NUMBER: PROPERTY ADDRESS: WASHINGTON our Tjtlel Commitment dated 02/0/o0 at 1.11(1° A.M. i .11.2pp enented Ek) Fni )niatt! 1 PARAGRAPH NU4BE1? (8) 1 OF OUR COMMITMENT IS (ARE) ELIMINA EC- 1 EXCEPT AS TO THE MATTERS SET VORTU HEREINADOVE, Tat TITLr '0 TIM PROPERTY COVERED HY TI113 OROKR HAZ NOT KEEN RD:ExAmtNEP. 1• , • , MARCH 21, 2000 AUTHORIZED RY; LINDA JACKSON ( T. ' .--- .. . . **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R0007230 Amount : 1, 000 . 00 12/21/00 09 :40 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: PDSK # 2010 Init : JEJ Project # : LUA00-171 Type : LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 000720-0075 Site Address : 75 BURNETT AV S Total Fees : 2, 514 . 52 This Payment 1, 000 . 00 Total ALL Pmts : 2, 514 . 52 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0017 Site Plan Approval 985 .48 000 . 05 . 519 . 90 .42 . 1 Postage 14 . 52 Lad u L1 u u u **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R0007229 Amount : 1, 514 . 52 12/21/00 09 :39 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: PDSK PROP #2009 Init : JEJ Project #: LUA00-171 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 000720-0075 Site Address : 75 BURNETT AV S Total Fees : 2 , 514 .52 This Payment 1, 514 . 52 Total ALL Pmts : 1, 514 . 52 Balance : 1, 000 . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 .345 . 81 . 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0017 Site Plan Approval 1, 014 .52 ov-li1 (9) DEVELOPMENT PLAN NIN(CITY OF RENTON DEC 212000 95 BURNETT RECEIVED TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared for PDSK PROPERTIES, INC. One Pacific Building 621 Pacific Avenue, #300 Tacoma, WA 98402 - 4611 November 29, 2000 Transportation Planning & Engineering , Inc . 2223 - 112th Avenue N.E., Suite 101 Bellevue, Washington 98004-2952 Telephone: (425) 455-5320 Facsimile: (425) 453-5759 1-- 95 BURNETT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared for PDSK PROPERTIES, INC. One Pacific Building 621 Pacific Avenue, #300 Tacoma, WA 98402 - 4611 Prepared by TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. 2223 - 112th Ave. N.E., Suite 101 Bellevue, Washington 98004-2952 Telephone —425.455.5320 FAX- 425.453.5759 http://www.tranplaneng.com November 29, 2000 gPo1uiH. EN. v wnsi 04, 4'' 16 le' Weh; z 6,4 4 :o Fcrs �4 [EXPIRES 915/Of j I TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. 2223-112'AVENUE N.E.,SUITE 101 -BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98004-2952 VICTOR H.BISHOP,P.E.President TELEPHONE(425)455-5320 DAVID H.ENGER,P.E.Vice President FACSIMILE(425)453-5759 November 29, 2000 Mr. Paul Krakow PDSK PROPERTIES, INC. 624 Pacific Ave., #300 Tacoma, WA 98404-4611 RE: 95 Burnett— City of Renton Traffic Impact Analysis Dear Mr. Krakow We are pleased to present this traffic impact analysis for the proposed 95 Burnett project consisting of 118 apartment units. The project is located at 95 Burnett Ave. S. in the City of Renton. The scope of this analysis is based on the City of Renton Policy Guidelines for Traffic Impact Analysis for New Development, the pre-application conference held on September 28, 2000 and discussions with Steve Taylor, Senior Planner with the City of Renton. Based on information from these sources, three intersections are analyzed in this report, including the site access driveway/Burnett Ave. S, Burnett Ave. S/S. 2nd St., and Burnett Ave. S./S. 3`d St. intersections The summary, conclusions and recommendations begin on page five of this report. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Figure 1 is a vicinity map showing the location of the site and the surrounding street network. Figure•2 shows a preliminary site plan prepared by Thomas Harkey Architects. The plan consists of a 118 unit, three story residential apartment complex over one story of parking. The upper three levels will be developed as two separate buildings with a common area connecting - them at the first residential level. The parking level contains 164 stalls. Vehicular access to the site will be provided with a driveway connection to Burnett Avenue South. Vehicles may enter the north or south parking garage from the circular drive. Full development of the proposal is expected to occur by the year 2002. Therefore, 2002 is used as the horizon year for the purposes of this study. Pedestrian access to the site is via the sidewalks on Burnett Ave. S. and two proposed connections between the site and a walkway in the park adjacent to the west side of the site. • C:1-ProjectslR PROJECTSIR0685001R06850D TIA.doc Mr. Paul Krakow PDSK PROPERTIES November 29, 2000 Page 2 EXISTING PHYSICAL CONDITIONS 1 The project site consists of three parcels with five existing buildings. The estimated total area of the buildings is 34,495 sq. feet comprised of 2,600 sq. ft of office space, 26,895 sq. ft. of warehouse space and 5,000 sq. ft. of retail space. A pet food store, a painting company, a computer recycler and a commercial-property management company occupy the five buildings, which will be demolished and removed from the site. The estimated AM peak hour, PM peak hour and daily trip generation of the existing on-site uses is shown in attached Table 1. Street Facilities Figure 3 shows existing traffic control, number of street lanes, number of approach lanes at intersections, and other pertinent information. The primary streets in the study area are classified per the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan as follows: S. 2nd St. Principal arterial S. 3`d St. Principal arterial Williams Ave. S. Minor arterial Wells Ave. S. Minor arterial Logan Ave. S. Minor arterial Burnett Ave. S. (south of S. 2"d St.) Collector arterial Burnett Ave. S. (north of S. 2nd St.) Local access Burnett Ave. S. north of S. 2nd St. has two lanes, is approximately 36 ft. wide from curb to curb and has sidewalks on both sides of the street with a planter strip on the east side. Parking is allowed on both sides of the street. Current land uses on this section of Burnett Ave. S. are mostly commercial and retail. McLendon's Hardware store is located on the east side of Burnett Ave. S. from S. 2nd St. to S. Tobin Avenue. { The Cedar River Terrace senior housing facility is located at the north end of Burnett Ave. South. An alley connects the north end of Burnett Ave. S. with Williams Ave. South. The Fred Hancock American Legion Post is located on the north side of the alley. A Salvation Army building is located between the alley and S. Tobin Street. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Traffic Volumes Figure 4 shows existing 2000 PM peak hour traffic volumes at the pertinent intersections affected by site-generated traffic. Turning movement counts were performed by the City of Renton on Wednesday and Thursday, February 23 and 24, 2000 and are attached in the technical appendix. ;I ! C:1-ProjectslR PROJECTSIR0685001R068500 TIA.doc Mr. Paul Krakow PDSK PROPERTIES 1 November 29, 2000 Page 3 Level of Service Analysis Level of Service (LOS) is a qualitative measure describing operational conditions within a traffic flow, and the of these conditions by drivers or passengers. These conditions perception include factors such as speed, delay, travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort, convenience, and safety. Levels of service are given letter designations, from A to F, with LOS A representing the best operating conditions (free flow, little delay) and LOS F the worst (congestion, long delays). Generally, LOS A and B are high, LOS C and D are moderate and LOS E and F are low. Table 2 shows calculated,levels of service (LOS) for existing conditions at the pertinent street intersections. The LOS's were calculated using the procedures in the Transportation Research Board Highway Capacity Manual - Special Report 209 3rd Edition updated December, 1997. The LOS shown indicates overall intersection operation. At intersections, LOS is determined by the calculated average delay per vehicle. The LOS and corresponding average delay in seconds are as follows: TYPE OF A g C D E F INTERSECTION Signalized < 10.0 >10.0 and <20.0 >20.0 and <35.0 >35.0 and <55.0 >55.0 and <80.0 >80.0 Stop Sign Control <10.0 >10 and <15 >15 and <25 >25 and <35 >35 and <50 >50 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITHOUT THE PROJECT Figure 5 shows projected 2002 PM peak hour traffic volumes without the project. These volumes include the existing traffic volume counts plus background growth. A compounded 2% per year annual growth rate is used in this report. The volumes shown on Burnett Ave. S. at the location of the site access driveway were taken from the north leg of the Burnett Ave. S./S. 2nd St. intersection. This is a conservative assumption since many of these trips are oriented to retail businesses located south of the project site and therefore will not pass by the site access driveway. TRIP GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION The 118 apartment units are expected to generate the vehicular trips during an average weekday and during the street traffic peak hours as shown below. These trips minus trips generated by existing uses equal the net new trips due to the proposed project. C:1-ProjecfslR PROJECTSIR0685001R068500 TIA.doc 1 i Mr. Paul Krakow PDSK PROPERTIES November 29, 2000 Page 4 I- � PROPOSED 118 APARTMENT UNITS Time Period Trip Rate Trips Trips Total Entering Exiting 391 391 Average Weekday 6.63 782 50% 50% 10 50 AM Peak Hour 0.51 16% 84% 60 PM Peak Hour 0.62 67% 33% 73 EXISTING SITE TRIP GENERATION(from Table 1) Average Weekday 182 182 364 AM Peak Hour 15 5 20 PM Peak Hour 10 21 31 NET NEW TRIPS Average Weekday 209 209 418 AM Peak Hour -5 45 40 PM Peak Hour 39 3 42 A vehicle trip is defined as a single or one direction vehicle movement with either the origin or destination (exiting or entering) inside the study site. The trip generation is calculated using the average trip rates in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, Sixth Edition, for Apartments (ITE Land Use Code 220). These trip generation values account for all site trips made by all vehicles for all purposes, including resident, employee, visitor and service and delivery vehicle trips. Figure 6 shows the estimated trip distribution and the net calculated site-generated traffic volumes. The distribution is based on the characteristics of the street network, existing traffic volume patterns, the location of likely trip origins and destinations (employment, shopping, social and recreational opportunities) and expected travel times. i-' Cl-Projects1R PROJECTSIR0685001R068500 TIA.doc Mr. Paul Krakow PDSK PROPERTIES November 29, 2000 Page 5 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT Figure 7 shows the projected 2002 PM peak hour traffic volumes with the proposed project. The site-generated PM peak hour traffic volumes shown on Figure 6 were added to the projected background traffic volumes shown on Figure 5 to obtain the Figure 7 volumes. Table 2 shows calculated LOS for future with and without-project conditions at the pertinent street intersections. The three study intersections operate at an acceptable LOS for future 2002 conditions including project-generated traffic TRAFFIC MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS The City of Renton requires a Transportation Mitigation Fee payment of$75 per new daily trip attributed to the development. The 782 daily trips generated by the proposal minus the 364 daily trips generated by existing on-site uses results in 418 new daily trips. The estimated Transportation Mitigation Impact Fee therefore is $31,350 (418 new trips X $75 per trip). Frontage improvements including curb, gutter and sidewalk along the project site's frontage on Burnett Ave. S. are required. SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend that the 95 Burnett Ave. S. apartment project be constructed as shown on the site plan with the following traffic impact mitigation measures: • Construct the frontage improvements along Burnett Ave. S. in accordance with applicable City of Renton standards. • Contribute approximately $31,350 Transportation Mitigation fee to the City of Renton. No other traffic mitigation should be necessary. If you have any questions please contact Vince Geglia or myself. Very truly yours, I TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. Z-AFLA, 7cie David H. Enger, P.E., P.T.O.E. VJG:sv Vice President C:1—ProjectslR PROJECTSIR0685001R068500 TIA.doc TABLE 1 95 BURNETT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRIP GENERATION OF EXISTING ON-SITE USES Time Period Trip Rate Trips Trips Total Entering Exiting OFFICE ITE LAND USE CODE 710, AREA=2,600 SQ. FT. 14 14 Average Weekday 11.01 28 50% 50% AM Peak Hour 1.56 88% 12% 4 PM Peak Hour 0.62 17% 83% 4 WAREHOUSE ITE LAND USE CODE 150, AREA=26,895 SQ.FT. 66 67 Average Weekday 4.96 133 50% 50% AM Peak Hour 0.45 82% 18% 12 PM Peak Hour 0.51 24% 76% 14 RETAIL ITE LAND USE CODE 814, AREA=5,000 SQ.FT. 102 101 Average Weekday 40.67 203 50% 50% AM Peak Hour 0.71* 61% 39% 4 PM Peak Hour 2.59 43% 57% 13 TOTAL EXISTING SITE TRIP GENERATION Average Weekday 182, 182 364 AM Peak Hour 15 5 20 PM Peak Hour 10 21 31 The trip generation is calculated using the average trip rates in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, Sixth Edition. * AM peak hour rate not shown in ITE Trip Generation for this land use. Rate was estimated by the proportion of AM to PM rates for other ITE retail land uses. C:1-ProjecfslR PROJECTSIR0685001R068500 TIA.doc TABLE 2 95 BURNETT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS PM PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY EXISTING INTERSECTION 2002 WITHOUT 2002 WITH 2000 PROJECT PROJECT Site Access/Burnett Ave. S. NA NA (A 9.8) Burnett Ave. S./S. 2nd St. A 7.0 A 7.4 A 7.5 Burnett Ave. S./S. 3rd St. B 14.2 B 18.3 B 19.9 • Number shown is the average stopped delay in seconds per vehicle for the intersection as a whole, which determines the LOS for intersections per the Transportation Research Board Highway Capacity Manual (HCM)- Special Report 209, 3rd Edition updated December 1997. (XX) LOS and delay for minor side street approach at an unsignalized intersection C:1-ProjecfslR PROJECTSIR0685001R068500 TIA.doc alMiliak Iv ire,, :,s S ( M1 W .• a 1 KY Y • argis"I t. R M1r ww dir i )tf,H s_ i VI a ` i• .af. i , "('a��/l.,,,�` tUIng l i�+(�., :;:r t ' /y = l_—' S.le"�n'..rL Ci'1• ' Mtt rM. ' ,..0 „.•,14;N,,'.�. . Ali .zs •. 1. OD iiilf.! i 1,:: ,, ,n 8200- Lk t ?, ' 9e --1 kPJ ( . PROJECT 4ag;1 ,�,� y S, - 1 SITE ' ao5 1111 S 13TND i S1 ft 1litir". �� .14r ," AI ,r''''dirit \,; , , S 12.,2nsii2PR.. .,,..• c ,i1s14,:‘,. ?, ! 3 1 i �,I 'r 8 I1fX1gVb •.' '-' Ili ,• 17v1' Sy t 7 , -1 I . Ikr41.7Q--,:., „L• .:;:;Iia., \ f^s' y.' 0;v•,•-. 0V i... .41 �//. i .r1,t,,.•:,,.:I.,,:.' e .7.'..3.,'.: £ MWI1J ♦ LV - -9..0,.-0-. . •il , l :mil _ pefrUrqr:gr R + 1r 4( (S� r' .� .��v'►/ Y a / Y f +,' ,7 at ' 1 I W i. . ,. IVA* . ,i0,,.-14 :3 , , ( i.. ' , 141;:l.;;,;:05.:,i',1: ',;,, • A ' L ';� • ire 61 µ �r .- i . .„, Jh' 161 . ! „ "4;i sv jMIL ,{�,u,t S 7 . "1..',,..'! dst 1 t+� w I „DI] 6 515 sS _ ' • - sue ` . a Irlw� -` • x.'. �y awn �s ' �ilAl� al •• `N '. iPogOidill3;4 d �+ d wow-- war • � � A °° 405 - s lii 20 16TH 1 ST ,., N .____I Li— —i--le � 0 t�. $ •. � S 16TH T o �► Vf N � S `" J SEVS:4,41gt3 i_i::: CG L N _ - tL `� r. ii! "Reproduced with permission granted by THOMAS BROS. MAPS®. This map is copyrighted by THOMAS BROS. MAPS®. It is unlawful to copy or reproduce all or any part thereof, whether for personal use or resale, without permission. All rights reserved." l VICINITY MAP ^ -. FIGURE if_ 95 BURNETT 1 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ii; , . z„.../....<,..7 , • r i r I ----, . .A. . . N • .1 wrmiv • P��� 0 :' .'i • • ...\\N‘. - . . • I I i b i 1 1 fJTOBINST . .. t:::'•.:.... . .. . :. • .1 • r ': • ra J1 I• f 1 4:::, ,. .1 ,,i;. ;±;,...,1%,,,k,\•• . „.: . : :;:;: N. A. 1 ' ' .R4,\\%\'\\\\ 1\N..N%' %*\:.. -.N. '',. . • / ••"1 :.:;•'\....., . .. i .,.... . ill111111 ( z ! I, L.-szs , i, I 8 I • ili::... ':::.•V:•'..- - .. ..x1:. 1.. 1 II . 1: 1 v�lrRN .. • 1 1 • •••••isXuv 0 1 i 1 1 , / SITE PLAN FIGURE 1 95 BURNETT if[I [. 2 i TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS . I N 2L 2L not to scale Alley Riverside Dr. I• 25 mph 1' 2L ' al S. Tobin St. 25 mph l _c s t J E NI E E _IN + L.!) N N N N 4 �- S 2nd St. O'7" �-3L 07 -0--3L O NSt 25 mph J tJ N N i N S 3rd St. 2L--► 2L--0- -Ott _O 25 mph 1.2 us vi as > ui as () i 1 c o m n = a) m LEGEND O Traffic Control Signal ai Stop Sign — Approach Lane & Direction I XL Number of Roadway Lanes .XL--► Number of Roadway Lanes and One Way Direction 1 .. EXISTING CONDITIONS FIGURE 95 BURNETT (IN- 3 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 1 I 1 N not to scale Alley Project S. Tobin St. Site CrciS �85 II �-685 S 2nd St. J $ �85 +—One Way tWednesday (0 Feb. 24, 2000 s— 3:30-4:30 O S 3rd St. i One Way--► 9 5 8 tr 79— --► 1 —y Ln° 71 .—ram) Thursday Feb. 23, 2000 in 4:00-5:00 a > a) L 1I LEGEND X--► PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume & Direction 2000 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES rFIGURE� 95 BURNETT 4 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS I 1 I � • _ N not to scale Alley Project S. Tobin St. Site 0 N oo cco No—88 II �-713 S 2nd St. J $ r88 -01--One Way N S 3rd St. One Way-- 43t / — 178, oo n cn ai _ Q a) ! C CO j I LEGEND X-► PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume & Direction 2002 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITHOUT PROJECT ti FIGURE 95 BURNETT 55 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS J 1 1 1 N [52] Alley Inot to scale ( 11(1)—► N N r-0(10) S. Tobin St. I Project Site 1 o [52] u I 12(6 � TOTAL PROJECT GENERATED TRIPS SHOWN 38(18� ; AT ACCESS DRIVEWAY NOT NET TRIPS N N) ^r �N u S 2nd St. [52] ) 1 NI--0(12) [63] .4--One Way I 25% 0 30% I ---► u 0.__/ `/d- u IS 3rd St. [52] 1 L [63] One Way--sm. 0(10)-0 I I N 0 cn > o0 Q u -4-, I coI O N LEGEND xx% Site Trip Distribution Percentage [XX] Two Way Average Daily Traffic Volume xx(yy)—► AM(PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes & Direction I NET NEW TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT FIGUR E.\ ill -; 95 BURNETT 6 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS I N not to scale ( Alley Project N,n S. Tobin St. Site ) l 18-1 1 t N-o no N S 2nd St. J I r88 --One Way t Lno S 3rd St. One Way--► � 9 9 9 3 7--► I 178'• Nn U) ai a) c L m LEGEND X--► PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume & Direction 2002 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH PROJECT FIGURE ' Iif 95 BURNETT 7 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Technical Appendix 1 ."' I I I 1 City of Renton Weather :SUNNY Transportation Systems Division Study Name: TMC058P-_._ Courted by:E6F Traffic Operations Site Code : 00000000 Board A :T-0920 2000 Studies Start Date: 02/23/00 Surface :DRY Page : 2 CARS, PEDESTRIANS,HEAVY VEHICLES !BURNETT AV S IS 3RD ST !BURNETT RV S IS 3RD ST ISouthbound !Westbound J !Northbound !Eastbound Start I I I 1 llrhvl, Time 1 Left Thru Right Other! Left Thru Right Other! Left Thru Right Other! Left Thru Right Other! Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection, for the Period: 15:00 on 02/23/00 to 16:45 on 02/23/00 Time 1 .16:00 I 16:00 16:00 1 16:00 I Vol. I 70 71 0 91 0 0 0 281 0 115 130 231 79 958 171 131 - Pct. I 46.6 47.3 0.0 6.01 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.01 0.0 42.9 48.5 8.51 6.4 78.4 14.0 1.01 Total 1 150 I 28 I 268 1 1221 I High 1 16:30 1 16:00 r I 16:15 I 16:30 I Vol. I 20 19 0 II 0 0 0 101 0 30 35 81 24 241 45 21 Total I 40 1 10 I 73 I 312 I - PHF 10.938 10.700 10.918 10.978 . "1'"'.-' 'CARS, PEDESTRIANS BURNETT AV S "HEAVY VEHICLES 9 t 0 ' 70 61 115 ', ., i: " O " 1 " 9 79 9 0 tt 71 70 194 i�8 28 I- 1 '� I nbound _5QI ,a ` out bound 194 6R• Total 34�i 1� O . 0 • O N 71 ' 0 O 79 . . ` 8 Inbound. 1221 Ir,bourrd 28 --Out bound 0 Out bound . 1158 0 ` • ^' 932 Total . 1221 Total .1186 0 Q� 958 26 130 171 958 1158 171 0 70 I ribaur,d 268 S 3RD ST , , ' < , ' Out bound 242 s:, .. 13 :;. :!';+; ; Total'. • 510 • 1 " '' 171 0 1112 129 � 3 ,.1,:: 71 " 0 ., 4 " 1:' 0 / I \ • 242 . ____._ -mow_ / 1 \ ti 0 115 130 2 3 North BURNETT AV S I J i 1 City of Renton . Weather :MOSTLY SUNNY Transportation Systems Division • Study Name: TMC050P Counted by:E6F Traffic Operations ' Site Code.i ' Board I1 :D4-1028 2000 Studies Start Date: 02/24/00 Surface :DRY Page 'i 2 CARS, PEDESTRIANS,HEAVY VEHICLES ) !BURNETT AV S IS 2ND ST !BURNETT AV S IS 2ND ST ISouthbound 'Westbound 'Northbound !Eastbound Start I I I I Ilntvl. Time I Left Thru Right Otherl Left Thru Right Other) Left Thru Right Other) Left Thru Right Other! Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 15:00 on 02/24/00 to 16:45 on 02/24/00 1 ' Time 'I 15:30 I 15:30 I 15:30 115:30 .1 Vol. I 0 60 86 181 85 685 85 701 139 116 0 171 0 0 0 01 --' Pct. I 0.0 36.5 52.4 10.91 9.1 74.0 9.1 7.51 51.1 42.6 0.0 6.21 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.01 Total I 164 I 925 I 272 I 0 '1 '` High 116:00 I 15:30 115:30 115:30. I Vol. I 0 18 24 61 20 176 26 131 39 29 0 41 0 0 0 01 Total 1 48 1 235 1 72 I 0 I PW.; I 0.854 1 0.984.. 10.944 1 0.000 is . 'CARS, PEDESTR I ANS BURNETT AV S °i4 "HEAVY VEHICLES 18 82 60 0 85 ;,'i 1 :• ' 4 " 0 0 116 " • 18 86 60 0 i' 70 • '—. :�1 1 I nbound 164 70 Outbound 20 *t-''0 .;. Tot a 1 365 86 .. 1 85 910 685 139 -- 647 Ift.r 0 Fs 38 685 :;s: ;{' :•:-.,-. ;,,p..,` >:• Inbound 0 Inbound , 925 , ' Outbound 910 �..._ ,; Out bound 0 ^' 74 `„ '',, � - :.,'`:0 Total 910925 ;, •:'. :: Tot a 1 11 8�a',�' ��77yy N 0 • IT1bound 272 S 2ND ST ,:.,.„ . •.-,.,, t.. , :,':: Outbound 145 . .., . .. :YP:. i'S ,J.� li:: .4?i'.... }'Ai •'^' ::� .. 'efvY'i"�I.L 5:eJ{ r. ;; �,,,4,. . .C., ..f. ,r;,;-:�,:;:_'; - ,,�:;,, :Total 417 60 ' 128 114 ' 0 `. 17 85 .. 11 2 0 0 / I \ i, ------- •------ -- -- •----- / I \ ...... 145 139 116 0 17 1 ' Nort h Ii BURNETT AV S 1 ' 2 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 1 i TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: SITE DRIVEWAY/BURNETT AVE S analyst: VG 'roject No. : R0784 Date: 11/17/00 "ast/West Street: DRIVEWAY forth/South Street: BURNETT AVE S ntersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ajar Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R L T R 'olume 37 209 151 burly Flow Rate, HFR 37 209 151 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided LT Channelized? ,apes 0 1 1 0 configuration LT TR Upstream Signal? No No [inor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R L T R rolume 6 0 18 Jourly Flow Rate, HFR 6 0 18 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 , "ercent Grade (%) 0 0 Iedian Storage 1 _Tared Approach: Exists? No Storage 'IT Channelized? ,anes 0 1 0 _ :onfiguration LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement ` 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT LTR r (vph) 37 24 C(m) (vph) 1424 779 v/c 0.03 0.03 )5% queue length 0.00 0.00 :ontrol Delay 7.6 9.8 LOS A A Approach Delay 9.8 Approach LOS A HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 PPE 'hone: VG Fax: -Mail: TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Cntersection: SITE DRIVEWAY/BURNETT AVE S .ity/State: RENTON Analyst: VG 3 ime period Analyzed: PM PK 2002 _ate: 11/17/00 East/West Street: DRIVEWAY ,-orth/South Street: BURNETT AVE S ntersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments -"ajor Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 37 209 151 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 eak-15 Minute Volume 9 52 38 4 ourly Flow Rate, HFR 37 209 151 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided T Channelized? anes 0 1 1 0 configuration LT TR Upstream Signal? No No inor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume 6 0 18 eak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 _eak-15 Minute Volume 2 0 4 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 6 0 18 -ercent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 ercent Grade (%) 0 0 _ edian Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage T Channelized? anes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments Movements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped/hr) 0 0 0 0 ane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 Upstream Signal Data Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal • vph vph sec sec mph feet S2 Left-Turn Through ;5 Left-Turn Through 7orksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Movement 2 Movement 5 ;hared ln volume, major th vehicles: 209 Jhared ln volume, major rt vehicles: 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 ;at flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 lumber of major street through lanes: 1 'gorksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation critical Gap Calculation Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 4 (c,base) 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 71(hv) 0 0 0 0 :(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 rade/100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3,1t) 0.00 0.70 0.00 0.00 }.(c,T) : 1-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 .(c) 1-stage 4.1 6.4 6.5 6.2 2-stage 4.1 5.4 5.5 6.2 'ollow-Up Time Calculations Iovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R (f,base) 2.20 3.50 4.00 3.30 (f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 P(HV) 0 0 0 0 t(f) 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 ,Iorksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals .omputation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(1,prot) V(t) V(1,prot) -' prog 'otal Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) Arrival Type Effective Green, g (sec) ^ycle Length, C (sec) p (from table 9-2) roportion vehicles arriving on green P g(ql) `1(q2) I(q) Computation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) alpha • beta 'ravel time, t(a) (sec) boothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) iin platooned flow, V(c,min) duration of blocked period, t(p) Proportion time blocked, p 0.000 0.000 :omputation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result p(2) 0.000 P(5) 0.000 )(dom) )(subo) .:onstrained or unconstrained? 'roportion inblocked (1) (2) (3) .:or minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage II )(1) ii(4) P(7) )(8) )(9) )(10) P(11) 5 .;omputation 4 and 5 Single-Stage Process 'iovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R V c,x 166 441 441 158 1 c,u,x r,x plat,x Two-Stage Process 7 8 10 11 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 V(c,x) 158 283 158 283 1700 1700 ,(x) /(c,u,x) C(r,x) )(plat,x) Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations ;tep 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 Conflicting Flows 158 'otential Capacity 893 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 iovement Capacity 893 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.98 ;tep 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 Conflicting Flows 166 -Dotential Capacity 1424 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1424 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.97 Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St. 0.97 ;tep 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 Conflicting Flows 441 ?otential Capacity 513 ?edestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.97 0.97 Movement Capacity 498 ?robability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 :onflicting Flows 441 ' ?otential Capacity 577 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.97 0.97 4aj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.98 0.98 ' 'ap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.96 0.98 L4ovement Capacity 564 ?orksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 )art 1 - First Stage • _!onflicting Flows 158 Potential Capacity 681 771 --1 I ! 6 1 ap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.97 1.00 ovement Capacity 661 771 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 art 2 - Second Stage onflicting Flows 283 Potential Capacity 765 681 ..edestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 ap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 0.97 ovement Capacity 765 661 art 3 - Single Stage onflicting Flows 441 otential Capacity 513 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.97 0.97 ovement Capacity11 498 Result for 2 stage process: a 0.00 0.00 0.00ilit 0.00 t 498 robability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 If tep 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 art 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows 158 Iotential Capacity 770 875 edestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 ap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.97 1.00 Movement Capacity 747 875 Tart 2 - Second Stage onflicting Flows 283 Potential Capacity 867 770 edestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 ap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.98 0.97 ovement Capacity 850 747 Tart 3 - Single Stage onflicting Flows 441 otential Capacity 577 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 aj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.97 0.97 aj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.98 0.98 ap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.96 0.98 Movement Capacity 564 I esults for Two-stage process: 0.00 0.00 Y 0.00 0.00 C t 564 ILorksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations I ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (vph) 6 0 18 ovement Capacity (vph) 564 498 893 hared Lane Capacity (vph) 779 Iorksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Isep 564 498 893 olume 6 0 18 Delay II 7 Z sep +1 'round (Qsep +1) z max sh 779 3UM C sep n C act Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ,ane Config LT LTR v (vph) 37 24 :(m) (vph) 1424 779 r/c 0.03 0.03 95% queue length 0.00 0.00 Control Delay 7.6 9.8 ,OS A A kpproach Delay 9.8 Approach LOS A aorksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Movement 2 Movement 5 ?(oj) 0.97 1.00 ;(il) , Volume for stream 2 or 5 209 v(i2) , Volume for stream 3 or 6 0 ;(il) , Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 1700 a(i2) , Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 1700 '*(oj) 0.97 d(M,LT) , Delay for stream 1 or 4 7.6 N, Number of major street through lanes 1 i(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 0.2 I 'i 8 I IIBurnett Ave. Apartments 11/16/00 Burnett Ave S. /S 2nd St. 09:59:09 Existing PM PeakHour 2000 IISIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages:I Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.53 Vehicle Delay 7.0 Level of Service A I Sq 11 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I + + A . + + ++++ ' / I \ <+ + <**** I v ++++ I A v I North I <* + * + * + II G/C=0.232 I G/C=0. 635 G= 13. 9" I G= 38. 1" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4 .0" I II OFF= 0.0% I OFF=29.8% I C= 60 sec G= 52 .0 sec = 86. 7% Y= 8.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% III Lane IWidth/ I g/C I Service RateI Adj I I HCM I L 190% Max' I Group 1 Lanes' Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E 'Volume' v/c I Delay I S I Queue I II N Approach PP 20.3 C+ I I TH+RTI 18/1 10.133 10.232 I 310 I 379 1 154 10.406 I 20.3 I C+I 100 ftl II S Approach 17.0 B I TH 112/1 10.105 10.232 I 335 I 389 I 122 10.314 I 15.7 I B I 79 ftl 1 LT 1 12/1 10.166 10.232 1 226 1 275 1 146 10.531 1 18.1 1 *B 1 98 ftl II E Approach 1.7 A II RT 112/1 10.095 10. 635 I 913 I 913 I 89 10.097 I 0.0 I Al 27 ftl I TH 112/1 10.454 10. 635 11029 11029 I 721 10.701 I 2.1 I *A 1226 ftl I LT 112/1 10.096 10. 635 1 905 1 905 1 89 10.098 1 0.0 1 A I 29 ftl II II Burnett Ave. Apartments 11/16/00 Burnett Ave S. /S 2nd St. 09:59:21 Existing PM PeakHour 2000 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Display of Intersection Parameters I I I II I Key: VOLUMES -- > 86 I 60 10 I I I I WIDTHS I 0.0 118.0 I 0.0 II I v LANES I 0 I 1 I 0 II II \ 85 12.0 1 / I \ / I \ -- 685 12.0 1 I O 0.0 0 / + / 85 12.0 1 North O 0.0 0 -- \ I / O 0.0 0 \ II I I I II 139 I 116 I 0 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 11 II 12 .0 112 .0 I 0.0 I PERMSV NNNN 1 1 1 1 0 1 OVERLPYYYY I II I I I LEADLAG LD LD 10 Burnett Ave. Apartments 11/16/00 Burnett Ave S./S 2nd St. 10:02:29 Future PM PeakHour 2002 without project SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.55 Vehicle Delay 7.4 Level of Service A Sq 11 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I **/** + -1" A + + ++++ / I \ <+ + <**** v ++++ I ^ v North <* + * + * + G/C=0.231 I G/C=0. 635 I G= 13. 9" I G= 38. 1" I Y+R= 4 .0" I Y+R= 4 .0" I OFF= 0.0% I OFF=29.8% I C= 60 sec G= 52 .0 sec = 86. 7% Y= 8.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% I Lane IWidth/ I g/C I Service Rate' Adj I I HCM I L 190% Maxl I Group I LanesI Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E 'Volume' v/c I Delay I S I Queue I N Approach 20.4 C+ I TH+RTI 18/1 10.136 10.231 I 310 I 379 I 159 10.420 I 20.4 I C+I 104 ftl S Approach 17.4 B I TH 112/1 10. 108 10.231 I 335 I 389 I 127 10.326 I 15.8 I B I 82 ftl I LT 112/1 10. 171 10.231 I 226 I 275 I 153 10.556 I 18.8 I *B 1103 ftl E Approach 2 .1 A I RT 112/1 10.098 10. 635 I 914 I 914 I 93 10. 102 I 0.0 I A I 28 ftl I TH 112/1 10.470 10. 635 11030 11030 I 751 10. 729 I 2 .7 I *A 1236 ftl I LT 112/1 10.099 10. 635 I 906 I 906 I 93 10. 103 I 0.0 I A I 31 ftl 11 Burnett Ave. Apartments 11/16/00 Burnett Ave S./S 2nd St. 10:03:51 Future PM PeakHour 2002 without project SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Display of Intersection Parameters I I I I I I Key: VOLUME S -- > 89 I 62 I 0 II I I WIDTHS I 0.0 118.0 I 0.0 II I v LANES I 0 1 1 1 0 II I I I II \ 88 12.0 1 / I \ / 1 \ -- 713 12.0 1 I 1 0 0.0 0 / + / 88 12 .0 1 North 1 0 0.0 0 -- \ I / 0 0.0 0 \ II I I I I 145 I 121 I 0 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 11 II 12 .0 112 .0 I 0.0 I PERMSV NNNN II 1 1 1 I 0 1 OVERLP YYYY II I I I LEADLAG LD LD II 12 Burnett Ave. Apartments 11/27/00 Burnett Ave S./S 2nd St. 13:29:28 Future PM PeakHour 2002 with project SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.55 Vehicle Delay 7.5 Level of Service A Sq 11 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I **/** + + A + + ++++ / I \ <+ + <**** v ++++ I Av North <* + L ' 1 * * 1 G/C=0.229 I G/C=0. 638 G= 13.7" I G= 38.3" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4 .0" I I OFF= 0.0% I OFF=29.5% I C= 60 sec G= 52.0 sec = 86.7% Y= 8.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% Lane (Width/ 1 g/C I Service Ratel Adj I I HCM I L 190% Max! 1 Group 1 Lanes' Regd Used 1 @C (vph) @E 'Volume' v/c 1 Delay 1 S 1 Queue 1 N Approach 20. 6 C+ li I TH+RTI 18/1 10. 138 10.229 1 306 1 375 1 161 10.429 1 20. 6 1 C+1 105 ftl S Approach 17.7 B 1 TH 1 12/1 10.121 10.229 I 330 1 385 1 147 10.382 1 16.3 1 B 1 95 ftl 1 LT 1 12/1 10.170 10.229 1 225 1 274 1 153 10.558 1 19.0 l *B 1 103 ftl E Approach 2.1 A 1 RT 1 12/1 10. 108 10. 638 1 917 1 917 1 106 10.116 1 0.1 1 A 1 32 ftl 1 TH 1 12/1 10.470 10. 638 1 1034 1 1034 1 751 10.726 1 2. 6 I *A 1 234 ftl I LT 1 12/1 10.099 10. 638 1 909 1 909 1 93 10.102 1 0.0 1 A 1 30 ftl 13 Burnett Ave. Apartments 11/27/00 Burnett Ave S./S 2nd St. 13.30:08 Future PM PeakHour 2002 with project SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Display of Intersection Parameters I I II I Key: VOLUMES -- > I 90 1 63 I 0 II I I WIDTHS 1 0.0 1 18.0 I 0.0 II I v LANES I 0 I 1 1 o II I I I II \ 101 12 .0 1 / I \ / I \ -- 713 12 .0 1 1 0 0.0 0 / + / 88 12.0 1 North 1 0 0.0 0 -- \ 1 / 0 0.0 0 \ II I I I II 145 I 140 I 0 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 11 1 I1 12 .0 112 .0 I 0.0 I PERMSV NNNN 1 I 1 I 0 1 OVERLPYYYY I I1 I I I LEADLAG LD LD li 14 Burnett Ave. Apartments 11/16/00 Burnett Ave S./S 3rd St. 10:15:44 Existing PM PeakHour 2000 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.76 Vehicle Delay 14 .2 Level of Service B+ Sq 11 I Phase 1 1 Phase 2 **/** * * * * / 1 \ * *> vA A **** North + +> ****> I + + ++++ + + v I G/C=0.178 I G/C=0. 689 I 1 G= 10.7" I G= 41.3" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4 .0" I OFF= 0.0% I OFF=24 .5% I C= 60 sec G= 52.0 sec = 86.7% Y= 8.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% I Lane IWidth/I g/C I Service RateI Adj I I HCM I L 190% Maxi I Group I Lanesl Reqd Used 1 @C (vph) @E 'Volume' v/c I Delay I S I Queue I N Approach 27.8 C ILT+TH 112/1 10.162 10.178 I 169 I 219 I 149 10. 677 I 27.8 l *C 1107 ftl Approach S A 20.5 C+ I RT 1 12/1 10.132 10.178 I 202 1 257 1 137 10.533 I 21.3 I C+I 94 ftl I TH 112/1 10.106 10.178 I 236 I 294 1 121 10.412 I 19.7 I B I 85 ftl W Approach 11.4 B+ I RT 112/1 10.162 10. 689 1 1001 11001 I 180 10.180 1 0.1 I A I 47 ftl ILT+TH 112/1 10. 625 10. 689 11170 11170 11091 10. 932 I 13.2 I *B+I 284 ftl 15 Burnett Ave. Apartments 11/16/00 Burnett Ave S./S 3rd St. 10:16:14 Existing PM PeakHour 2000 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Display of Intersection Parameters I I I II I Key: VOLUMES -- > I 0 I 71 I 70 II I I WIDTHS I 0.0 112.0 I 0.0 II I v LANES I 0 I 1 I 0 II I I I I I \ 0 0.0 0 / I \ /I \ -- 0 0.0 0 I 79 0.0 0 / + / 0 0.0 0 North 958 12.0 1 -- \ I / 171 12.0 1 \ II I I I II 0 I 115 I 130 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 11 II 0.0 112.0 112.0 I PERMSV NNNN II 0 I 1 1 1 1 OVERLP YYYY II I I I LEADLAG LD LD 16 I ' Burnett Ave. Apartments 11/27/00 Burnett Ave S./S 3rd St. 13:33:37 Future PM PeakHour 2002 without project SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.79 Vehicle Delay 18.3 Level of Service B Sq 11 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I **/** * * * * /I \ * *> A I A **** North + +> ****> 1 + + ++++ + + v G/C=0. 178 I G/C=0. 689 I 1 G= 10.7" I G= 41.3" I Y+R= 4 .0" I Y+R= 4 .0" I I OFF= 0.0% I OFF=24 .4% I C= 60 sec G= 52.0 sec = 86. 7% Y= 8.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% I Lane IWidth/ I g/C I Service Ratel Adj 1 I HCM I L 190% Maxi I Group I Lanesl Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E IVolumel v/c I Delay I S I Queue I N Approach 29. 9 C ILT+TH I12/1 10. 168 10. 178 I168 I218 I155 10.708 I29. 9 I *C I 1 11 ftl S Approach 19. 9 B I RT 112/1 10.112 10.178 I 202 I 257 I 111 10.432 I 20.0 I B I 76 ftl I TB 112/1 10.109 10.178 I 236 I 294 1 126 10.429 I 19.8 I B I 88 ftl W Approach 16.7 B I RT 112/1 10. 167 10. 689 11001 11001 I 187 10.187 I 0.1 I A I 48 ftl ILT+TH 1 12/1 10. 649 10. 689 1 1170 1 1170 1 1135 10. 970 1 19.5 I *B 1 295 ftl • 17 Burnett Ave. Apartments 11/27/00 Burnett Ave S./S 3rd St. 13:33:55 Future PM PeakHour 2002 without project SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Display of Intersection Parameters I I I I I I Key: VOLUMES -- > 0 I 74 I 73 II I I WIDTHS 0.0 112 .0 I 0.0 II I v LANES I 0 I 1 I 0 II I I I II \ 0 0.0 0 • / I \ / I \ -- 0 0.0 0 I 82 0.0 0 / + / 0 0.0 0 North 1 997 12.0 1 -- \ I / ' 178 12.0 1 \ II II 0 I 120 I 135 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 11 II 0.0 112 .0 112 .0 I PERMSV NNNN 0 I 1 I 1 I OVERLP YYYY I 11 1 I I LEADLAG LD LD 18 Burnett Ave. Apartments 11/27/00 Burnett Ave S./S 3rd St. 13:32:30 Future PM PeakHour 2002 with project SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.80 Vehicle Delay 19. 9 Level of Service B Sq 11 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I **/** * * * * • / I \ * *> I v ^ I **** North + +> ****> I + + ++++ + + v I G/C=0.178 I G/C=0. 689 I G= 10. 7" I G= 41.3" I 1 Y+R= 4 .0" I Y+R= 4 .0" I OFF= 0.0% I OFF=24 .4% I C= 60 sec G= 52.0 sec = 86. 7% Y= 8.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% I Lane (Width/ 1 g/C I Service Ratel Adj I I HCM I L I90% Maxi I Group I Lanes ! Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E (Volume! v/c 1 Delay I S I Queue I N Approach 30. 9 C ILT+TH 1 12/1 10. 169 10.178 I 166 I 216 I 156 10.719 I 30. 9 I *C 1 112 ftl S Approach 20.0 C+ 1 RT 1 12/1 10. 112 10.178 I 202 1 256 1 111 10.434 1 20.0 1 B 1 76 ftl 1 TH 1 12/1 10. 115 10.178 1 236 1 294 1 135 10.459 1 20.0 1 C+ I 94 ftl W Approach 18. 6 B 1 RT 1 12/1 10. 167 10. 689 11001 11001 1 187 10. 187 1 0.1 1 A 1 48 ftl ILT+TH 1 12/1 10. 656 10. 689 1 1170 1 1170 1 1147 10. 980 1 21. 6 I *C+ I 298 ftl 19 Burnett Ave. Apartments 11/27/00 Burnett Ave S./S 3rd St. 13:32:53 Future PM PeakHour 2002 with project SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Display of Intersection Parameters I I I II I Key: VOLUMES -- > I 0 I 74 I 74 II I I WIDTHS I 0.0 112 .0 I 0.0 11 I v LANES I 0 I 1 I 0 II ! I I I II \ 0 0.0 0 . / I \ / I\ -- 0 0.0 0 I 1 93 0.0 0 / + / 0 0.0 0 North 1 997 12.0 1 -- \ I / 178 12 .0 1 \ II II 0 1 128 I 135 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 11 II1 0.0 112 .0 112 .0 I PERMSV NNNN I I I I 0 1 1 1 1 1 OVERLP YYYY 1 I1 1 I I LEADLAG LD LD 20 1\\\ \ . / ,..-,-;e:1,/ It.„,„..a.x, i To ____,:,.;_:;;i: \ \\\',T V', 14 / 4 1 y....- 1 W'\i"'^1'd. a •. •� N (/. .1.- „2,,,,,,,,,,:, c 1 I S ,y�y i�3f d ,a f - , ,,,,,.e ,. \ \ YY}�� '•\ 't•'.' "'`) ; '� ' •,-�-'T ,* J e �!, rT`I�i i I t_ • r11-3 w !I°I ;,...67. -. 1. i1 \ \C., T'�r `l r ✓ r �., 1r� .1t` Ii - - , \ \-t„ ,r, c.,., e,-I,. \ 4. \N ' ,. ` \I"' i ;ti r. `»�. it s t� Iz�,� .12:rrx 72D00 CD 1 \ \ efi� 5} •.J 4_ la,u rio.i e u ,.• _ r b,T,.� ! I .4. 14 " _.1 r' ' • • .._- ; \\ mac- \y- \, Yts- CT{*eJ '{t d • C o� ••1 to ---inu! —- n .♦ i•t',5 . 1 2 ,� 1 .. ( ,r r ..� 1 �� ti'#,_� 1. ••� 1•r \;. h,r° 11 ^- ,.'f t , A��"" w•J' r • • J7� t re , , siee (�7J _ i \\��,y`�;Q -I CY.l�• d ',yI I a % \ J e.__.. C e C J : ► re•" L• • y F 1 N. ,•c ~ \,,,, \~ - 1 k\i `: `\ y. �' `\ SST ^{,- ,�• ' ° - 1 , • ' '''.. a i 1 r:0;7'4? COMMERCIAL „ ' •ys-rin°�.. AV E. °\ '�c�° I \\ce co '(� _ �,.• 1 • • '1 bs k 3.f .!C Jr 'I i26 i'T �! T•T�C, tf o 1 \+! ` 1 I \\�t\ ` �1 • ��ti' � . s R-a�.:).enr,---___75T- N"• • 1N � .� l �IC J IN . F -, wpm . 4 . • t 1 .n \\ \ Ir. 4m t s+ , dillni, � .��� ��• ,•�t'-• 0r y •_rf'�+ �rr• � T `+\ f'^ 25�•• T- 4 ..- wit - e_. • ;..:.- - .. � . .,!. .._•..f_-..-.=i1 -'1..:.%... .1s +V 't►•►,l .'4' etlo `�f:_:, { /4)P L.¢!,'EI P' ti 4�q/AY--- 1 f Ir—I,;7 \° � N r, , JY�nr, r 3— 2 r — J 722330 6 jiu7A �� tee+. � 2i`,Y p.: •<. a hj T . 1MMAN - h ` 1111 Mini XI IN . -IMO MORA . Elli i Nr.---3-4 .:\'\:sz.,..„ • 2 !,,c1103- Nv,: . .*v..A>Z' Nov.r. r_i.... a ., - . r on • ne,•'F"Q 6Z I. •��\ -I ' �� :! 1 rd',AA_.:i N �. 1 - o s i • n l 1 • �' / • �+ e. "` ' .I�+dc- �`r� 1li 'Jrb O/Z [j'o I�11�` ��.�, \4l �.+0`,\\ ,i Cr `\fib v \too? r Ir 17•11{a(ptJ _o! ' '[-I -I L- .0 V.1.t.ar�� • q� i \ /I �9 .•sr.v I :•T tIl _C ^Ir 1. �,° @r1. e, lIsl" or G 3 i !Ir r , ✓''' �',,;'_ +•�I ' 10•°.t1. :•s' +•�' • •' s ,•",..� P .7 3 .. + k{ ,. ''40, r,�* av n to a. \pV•�• �� 7G Q r W . I). met' .. rt' .1'r,.l1 vgi Trio 1 TytAl kx11�3>tkb'' 7r� ul t I ra�. NI, ieiis,• '4• Y ,r• • 19 ! �' 0. • i I2a"7� _ _ c 7rf,A Art) J ® ,r S "ia1 '�►a ' .' --a—. � • ' / e r s\R/ 4... .00 06 .0 • ° •.` " 14 r�ti.. •• .:9. , ♦ 4,0•} '''1'r be 4, ' to b°°43rn,g +, .1 \\�� �' r' ra •,• "` ._•._ .... .. ....;......... .. _.• p ram .. , 67- °' . . ? el .,.••_+• �.i"(' �� •, 0, � ' Si••., ' `�\s/ 0'°b , • WO L. r I 14 r P __lb" • �1 • ,.p•i". „ y�Y.r. .s— =a is; \ ^h?da�' In r L'I t1 \ 1• -04 c N� 6_•• y • \ R • . � r i 1 . :. IP • N• �r rV N'� ' �,•r•-+ )•• rt 11120mac2,• Oa; '\ ;°el .a 6wi •••_7o .• , �,it17 {` , T 1N 'p - ` f ` �r .� r 'tAI tiO " ; • s ' k p/ . , It pdo4 ` pw4 `�n 97a\1 .T•7",• 0\ 91s)r i Y.4=L1 tM ..• 11, .a �• . ' . cia a - < ` � v Oyr;„ .t�? ` ' r Ji 8 44 a — t J I F ,.� ,P'' l Mrk� • °utu j 4 ® r E ` /IL r );1.1-t,A, va - r..-; .1? � � n J•� R .4t'�' ,ti't*,, »A a 1. la 41,s� b ( i f o _.,� `: :.-- .4 •4 ,A:,t� tl `_• p. V7 Z �` :t . � „ .. i ,4 r r . o 7 �/Oer • } :n'�f�: I ,b L' „m es yl t r4 �' •, GppO ' �J r9m C .W.t' :• I A • IS' i n l� abfb 1,..„....„._ •Z to, 't. MJ,'�p� p INS_yam_ - f nyr • Y •, .p '•r i+, S A • ky 6 gyp'h, .! '/,... �fY"•�'.•0 74 I 0 rq, • 1'�°° ,...,•• t;ee WI bN° -- r ,� �'J-;�� , -r W It / '✓a __.�1� • r J�] 15(,. . I.e 0 . aso J .s• 3 Om r a u+ Y L/-'=� —<.. `y Je'"I s o Ji 3 d Ito, �{•' �` ` d I I y,ti .srl'"• -7.J_�. �'' . .__. , Quo _ l ,>1•.. • Bill 2 9r '`2 A } /r wi 2' 1� I'l" A.� l.,aM� „ �o I ao I ow° ..,...o� 1 fro ',�0 . =r a a P 191!'�' fo q S I°'ie/ t �• ~I add s+`_.., ,,, 4g l't a s• Jo roe JPR e Jt7 as raa 1 Jr/ .., r1.J 7 • vac.e.°.irre. 2*la /}re0 S. • SEGO N 0 ST. 4. ALGONA •i..._. �. •4 S 1OO.y 8T a• . •• t _Pat pi • q-M-51 .a•.•,+ • C , Warm IIat� re 100 o Gv r io re za i Iry 1325.07 t►a !K �•� 1 K. 3'1 7 R A l>s ! t •! " e.a � .ee 9 ! 1 20 h I 20�t 1� I pJro A p �0 Ae �� }t 1 ' 2 ch 46tt!Y, y t r 9 � ,�P•y'q 214,tf �° 18 • ` 2 i�rP ,tu°d� 19, J .JI a J o ®"�� �4re. I' it,._ V`/A62 « A• 1� ��-a—���'�� r °s `� of.. a E. -- 1 I I�_� -,_z ! no�, f .` v l' •' ' 2 , s0 4"r say t Iti . 5 51 r(' ,�►i. : 7 1e< 1� 12 '3 nM16 �1}� 18 ' N `�3 �oOP A�18 3 5�P►� NIP 18 ' * --°O P 11 1 �0a�, ��; ra•1 ¢ „�4q�1 I 5' T 6,. a!11 .r '. t `..�� 17' �P° °�I7' N 4 ' 1� �e & Ul•N../ „�� .,Q..6• I I, ` ' 4 x t� - Ip 19BJ `�� db°• W�ti'+�IT' vi Nneli ,IA, ht• kit R A ''" r A 6 V ••rj r ` "f 'l: ',`I f IJ PP �( 0 . M. © Ep51� IPe o rq� . 4' . , 01° ��y /11 4' ' a •''0 I Itv/�,'ti''A' ii' '� Ir J re` W r a 4411 ..it, mu. �.) y -.-. bf'—M�r 'MI*,iurl •�\� titre 5ry° `♦)-\��,.6 r • Or'� r°,/ir a 1 - Q^ ` � � I n •� � s I� �M/ OT• s ill �*® 1 .«r/e i d�.lt y Is /I r , �{ 11' 7 r1Pe o IA' t 7 �p��•.. 01,71914' +. Ito ,►�. 1 .. r I, I ?E r+ n IPI -I ,, z k "Ity ' e P I E ' a t JpRo K. °IE° W y, ..8... �g19 1 a•° 13 ■ j1 {7 '•ry O `Rlaa r 4 ty` rz Ifr ;W JM d1t' rtle a 97 '. .•6 • ~ °'1 .i)'• {j "RR6 j�e ✓ ►oO;s�s� �y r• R�,r"+°.AI?,si sm".''12 ' �'�9tr r��gD,�A 412 4. � • ire' . (LY itili s» » !� ._ty Ji r �. t �~* a i2 s. Y / ., .. /O m/a°� is rze 11�, 0,41/4110 rue so 11h !a Igio,, pAo Im°II y 10 tr,m • ,s. •�t • _ 4. rem �= Ka _ .. rkp o. ire Ln e' .•' S. 1'0 ST - 2 0.44.b w'AIj be 4 e S. 3RD ST. +eo••n t N•.r.J' a J e r t1) I 3 i•. N .sra/J✓l3aa A O "4 IN 1 �•N x I. 4• r• M N Y f• Klit..1 N •• K IQ ^. ,�' •• 6 6 qt 1s / 6 } !� r / „ �" ". • -,,,,,es: C �, °$ ti' 4 � , frfpoo ti �� a >,i.✓• 91W illilli .2 ;� 2 pov° J'e3p 10 1 ,n •, Ibb ,' ,�,e�n N I. a �f it N M �f ~ ` �A Z t -si ANICE ... r . ... ,_ w a ,*na. - I, e 41.t I1 n A•s.1 i': " .e2 I re -*I .... e . _u .r':..�. '4 10 '_ i (4 4 1 /P a 5 .> - "oe40 ✓f' .'lM4.11 Q '►3 0 '4r1ti s ni:''' • , , 1 -03- •CO- ----c0— -CO i \ s 1•., • _ :,i . '-_-:- , ., • LIL.,1.2•••._:).1 ,c.• • •, : : ._.-.9 iii---- .-.- -- - Y—'---- -- \. \ . - \. '• PC---0 i._ '•,2',.7. ....— , i\l" . • \ ,, \ N , \ \ . . —OD * — El: ----. ....___j._si —IX —CO CO L --- -.--1— \ — -- a R-17'> ----- : ! .,44,_ I H ( P ) \ - Ns \--N Airport Way P b. NN r frr \ \N R-8 -1 .....w o„...1.—.— . .. / , CAI 1 CAE I 1 I CA ' ....-1 '.......! (-...-' — .1 - - 1 • 1 I TObini iSt, : 1 • 1 Rro H.L...1 .t9,_ _.,1, _ RM-U \\N, Ns, / x; • I ,,, ,,, •me. \\..... „......, .11M1m...................=••••••••••• 16 i 1 ;. ! • I• •-•• • • i RT-8 i ! R-8 --4 —4 : 1 . , : ! • I ". —,_— .. ,.,.. W —. ._. —.. :-•ii...._ . , N N.. --' I CA Nimmin ------'C4 C D ( P ) 5Vr6 fil." L kr , -...i. ..____ ... —-- -RM -U — -\.---I , .._ RM- - . It , ... . ....-- I#_1 , RM-U 171' ..._..:___ :KT_ 2:..r.:__:: 1 • . a .._...:4i \A CD CD .--. ! ) S 2nd St. 4)S 2nd St. • . 2 --, ......... ----------_____ _.. r-- 1 ------,/ J 4. , ,.. _ ___ i___ __._ : Li--- c ..___LI }, CD ---- CD . -C.)- ---- I 1) q A_ _ __ _____ --____ ......a.). CD ---- -0- ---L.._ I sr :_rf• "......,..,...,, 1 S 3rici S er- cP-5 I 01* 1 ' 1 - il:--- . . t.) 1..,---r—r---i-r--r—,-,-!-r- .i I co ei 1 0 1 c4 I I cpl 1 /2 I co, 1 1 L___.. --ig ...Ca • 1 rdP1. :-• -.0.. 7.-...- -A,-=I -.= _........ -77 CD CD(P) I CD C.D. ao 0. PP: CD i• .---- -- . --- - cp....._ I .... ..,.... ,...----. 4k,\-1. . -- -,... . __......- 1-1-- " •-•-••,- .›.6-- - ,?_,.._-. . _.- CD055 tigi 1 .- -...E..t r I) - • •e--1 c.............• ..--------- \ a) LLS ; .,--- -_- — 17117-7 rir...7 r---11---, n I-7 ,7-1 r---1.-_--, ,----,-,, Ex .ia Cedar River Terrace property (residential apartments) 2-foot high concrete wall storage. approximate interpreted locality--`---_1 s,e, � Pier Corps office of 19,340-gallon capacity above- ----- (73 Burnett Ave.S.) ground storage tanks I shed( ,D B-1 � .... B-2 0 asphalt surfaced g to Canber Corps warehouse- B-3 �++ a a [former 11..,,..II n Ergge] 1 B-4 ' -1 W concrete! ads CD a *� Canber Corps a. (former cel tr p warehouse disp user rea) [former barrel c ; I • platform] x L y (^ fence D.S.Po cn Purcell - 4 .-. Painting,Inc. w warehouse o B 6 iA Pr %co CA asphalt surfaced 0 k y GM B-7 : t 1 : D.S.Purcell office(75 fence Burnett Ave.S. • inferred shallowr - _,-_ ___ __ Starkovich Pro er groundwaterjlow p ty direction Northwest unrurfaced Pneumatic& B-5 (grmel/soil) Electric Repair (77 Burnett Ave.S.) 1 I� Lande Feed Building (95 Burnett Ave.S.) 1 =Approximate location of Strataprobe borings by EAI on 8-27-99 NORTH B-1 (B-1 through B-4) and 1-19-2000(B-5 through B-7). Scale: 1 inch = 40 feet ENVIRONMENTAL SITE EXPLORATION MAP r' ASSOCIATES, INC. Commercial Property • 73-77 Burnett Avenue South '' J — - - 2122-112th Avenue N.E.,Ste.B-100 Renton,Washington Bellevue,Washington 98004 r Job Number: Dale Logged by: Plate: JN 9319-1 Feb.2000 2 Historic Places In Washington-Record List http://www.ocd.wa.gov/info/Igd/oahpiregister/list_l.tpl 4:1. `' `* ± r1 ►w� �'�._ 11`+�ti_ �1► �._ 1►\ _ _ll�.Np_ 11w._ N�.._ NN._ V Choose from these records File# NR Listing Records Listed by Historic Name 171 WHR/NR PACIFIC COAST COMPANY HOUSE#75:RENTON VICINITY 127 WHR RENTON COAL MINE HOIST FOUNDATION:RENTON 164 WHR RENTON FIRE STATION:RENTON 196 WHR RENTON SUBSTATION,SNOQUALMIE FALLS POWER COMPANY:RENTON Historic Places Home I Name&Address Search I Classification Search gXki61 L 1 of 1 03/12/2001 1:28 PM STAFF City of Renton REPORT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations BACKGROUND REPORT DATE March 6, 2001 Project Name 95 Burnett Applicant PDSK Properties, Inc. t 621 Pacific Avenue#300 Tacoma,WA 98402 File Number LUA-00-171, SA-H, ECF Project Manager Steve Taylor Project Description The proposed project will include the demolition of Lande Feed Mill and several other small commercial buildings located onsite to construct a four-story apartment structure containing 118 dwelling units. The density for the project is approximately 91 dwelling units/acre. The first floor will contain structured parking with 164 stalls. Vehicular access is via Burnett Avenue South. The property is zoned Center Downtown (CD). The proposed project will include thinning and replanting trees in the adjacent park and the addition of a small plaza to create pedestrian connections to Burnett Avenue South and to the building lobby area. Additionally, the project will remove two underground storage tanks. One tank is located onsite;the other is located just off-site on park property. Project Location 73, 75, 77 and 95 Burnett Avenue South Exist. Bldg.Area gsf All existing buildings will be Proposed New Bldg. 152,021-sf removed Area gsf Site Area 56,557-sf(1.298 acres) Total Building 152,021-sf Area gsf CRITERIA: 1. BUILDING SITING AND DESIGN i. Pedestrian Building Entries—Minimum Standards:Require buildings to be oriented to the street with clear connections to the sidewalk. A primary entrance of each building shall be located on the facade facing the street. The main entry to the proposed apartment building faces Burnett Avenue South, the only street fronting the site. The building entry is located off a central courtyard that serves as both pedestrian and vehicle access. The entry is marked with a canopy and prominent architectural treatment to the elevations at that • location. Raised pedestrian walkways provide clear connection to the sidewalk. Entry to the parking garages is located off to the sides of the central courtyard. This moves the garage entries off of Burnett and makes them less visible. Guidelines focus on providing clear architectural entrance features with lobbies, canopies and ornamental lighting. Also encouraged are pedestrian pathways,plazas and landscaping. Staff has worked with the applicant to further enhance the project entry. The applicant has agreed to demarcate the pedestrian walkways with a raised and colored paving pattern that will also alert drivers to slow down. Other proposed changes include adding arbors with plantings over the garage entries and making the canopy over the entrance larger. The applicant should submit plans showing the proposed architectural details for staff review and approval. ii. Transition to Surrounding Development — Minimum Standards: Careful siting and design treatment is necessary to achieve a compatible transition where new buildings differ from surrounding development in City of Renton P/B/PW Department Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations 95 BURNETT LUA-00-171,SA-H,ECF REPORT OF MARCH 6,2001 Page 2 of 5 terms of building height, bulk and scale. The following design elements shall be considered to promote a transition to surrounding uses: • Setbacks at the side or rear of a building may be increased in order to reduce the bulk and scale of larger building and so that sunlight reaches adjacent yards; • Building proportions, including step backs on upper levels; • Building articulation to divide a larger architectural element into smaller pieces; • Rooflines,pitches and shapes. The proposed development holds the street edge unlike current buildings, which have parking lots between them and the street edge. To the South of the site are a garage and a house containing a business. These properties are zoned CD and are likely to.redevelop in the future. To the North is multi- family retirement housing similar in scale to the proposed project. The proposed building is 4 stories, with a maximum building height of 50 feet. Breaking the building into two distinct buildings above the first level reduces the overall bulk of the project. Levels 2 through 4 are also set back from the street and further modulated with recesses for decks. The bulk of the first level is modulated between alternate setbacks from the sidewalk of 2 to 4 feet and broken by the expanse of the auto court. Although the proposed building would be taller than surrounding buildings to the south and west, the; immediate area is zoned CD and likely to change as incremental redevelopment occurs. Comprehensive' Plan policies encourage taller buildings and more intensive use of properties in the downtown core. The CD zoning allows for a 95-foot height limit. The proposal complies with the minimum standards of this criterion. No guidelines are suggested. 2. PARKING,ACCESS, CIRCULATION i. Location of Parking— Minimum Standards: No parking shall be located between a building and front property line or street side of a corner lot ii. Design of Surface Parking—Minimum Standards: Parking lot lighting shall not spill onto adjacent, of abutting properties. Structure/Garage Parking—No minimum standard. Guidelines state that parking entries should not subordinate pedestrian entries and should not dominate the streetscape. Parking garages should be architecturally compatible with the residential portion of the building. The parking structure should be enclosed or screened through any combination of walls, decorative grilles, o j trellis work with landscaping. Garage parking should be secure. The street side of parking garages in the CD zone should incorporate retail or service commercial facilities. There is no surface parking proposed. All parking is contained within the building. Entry to the parking garages is from a central courtyard off of Burnett Avenue South. The street-facing façade of the garage is faced in split face concrete block, an attractive material that is compatible with the residential portion of the building. Landscaping is also proposed to soften the bulk of • the parking garage. The garage will be controlled with electronic entries. There are highly visible garage portals facing Burnett Ave. S. and the applicant has indicated that the openings would be infilled with a screen pattern and window mullions that echo the residential building but no material samples were submitted. Decorative treatment of the garage openings is essential along Burnett Ave. S. for compatibility with the residential portion of the building above and to maintain a pedestrian friendly streetscape. The applicant should submit a product sample of the screening for the garage openings for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permits. The proposal complies with the minimum standards of this criterion. City of Renton P/B/PW Department Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations 95 BURNETT LUA-00-171,SA-H,ECF REPORT OF MARCH 6,2001 Page 3 of 5 3. LANDSCAPING/RECREATION/COMMON SPACE i. Minimum Standard — Attached housing developments of 10 or more dwelling units shall provide a minimum area of common space or recreation area equal to 50 square feet per unit. The common space area should be aggregated to provide usable area(s)for residents. The project consists of 118 dwelling units,which would require 5,900 square feet of common space. The proposal includes 5,000 square feet of common area and a 900 square feet credit is requested for public park improvements. Park improvements consist of a decorative plaza containing a raised sitting wall, landscaping, and pedestrian connections. The common areas include a 1,000 square foot exercise room, an 800 square foot common gathering space at the building lobby, which will contain a fireplace and seating furniture. There are two landscaped courtyards; one is 1,500-sq. ft. located above the lobby area and the other 1,700-sq.ft., on the north side of the building.All of the common areas would be open and accessible to all residents. The courtyard areas would utilize landscape planters and trellises to create a separation between private outdoor areas of the first level units and the common courtyards. In addition, there are a number of other smaller linear landscaped areas along the perimeter of the building and around the central courtyard,which also contains a small water feature. Staff recommends approval of the open space credit. The park is located directly adjacent to the building and the proposed plaza and landscape improvements create a more useful urban open space available not only to residents of the project, but to the public at large. RMC 4-3-100C allows the Director of Development Services the authority to modify the minimum standards of the Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations provided the development as a whole meets the intent of the regulations. The proposed common areas comply with the minimum standard and guidelines of this criterion. 4. BUILDING ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN i. Building Character and Massing - Minimum Standard—All building facades shall include modulation or articulation at intervals of no more than 40 feet. The proposed building utilizes a variety of modulation and articulation. At the street level the building is generally setback 2 feet from the property line with step backs of 2 feet at intervals no longer than 40 feet. A variety of types of textured CMU will be used on the on the street front elevations. Walls along Burnett are broken up with openings, which contain decorative screen material. In addition the auto court near the center of the project breaks down the length of the building. Above the street level the building is modulated such that there are no elevations longer than 40 feet on the street sides. The proposal complies with the minimum standard and guidelines of this criterion. ii. Building Rooflines - Minimum Standard— Building rooflines should be varied by emphasizing dormers, chimneys, stepped roofs, gables, prominent cornice or fascia, or be broken or articulated to add visual interest to the building. Both flat and sloped roofs are used in the project to break down the scale of the buildings and create the feeling that the project is a city block made up of several different buildings. In addition hip roof forms of various sizes break up the sloped portions of the roof on this building. The proposal complies with this criterion. Building Materials- No Minimum Standard—Guidelines state that exterior finishes should add visual interest and detail and be made of material that is durable, high quality and easily maintained. iii. The base of the building is faced with durable materials mainly consisting of concrete block. The upper portions of the building use "lighter" appearing materials, vinyl siding, stucco and metal siding. The proposed building materials meet the guidelines of this criterion. City of Renton P/B/PW Department Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations 95 BURNETT LUA-00-171,SA-H,ECF REPORT OF MARCH 6,2001 Page 4 of 5 Decision The modification to the minimum recreation/open space standard is allowed. The 95 Burnett Development, File No. LUA-00-171, SA-H, ECF, is determined to comply with the minimum standards and guidelines of the Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations, RMC 4-3-100 D, E, F & G subject to the following condition. 1. The applicant shall submit a product sample of the screening for the garage openings/portals for staff approval. Decorative treatment of the garage openings is essential along Burnett Ave. S. for compatibility with the residential portion of the building above and to maintain a pedestrian friendly streetscape. Development Services Division staff shall approve the screening prior to issuance of building permits. 2. Prior to approval of the building permit, the applicant shall indicate the proposed architectural details for the entry area on the building plans for staff review and approval. EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: March 6,2001 SIGNATURE: Uiarl Ahoi ) o Neil Watts,Development Services Director date TRANSMITTED this 6th day of March, 2001 to the applicant and owner: PDSK Properties, Inc. 621 Pacific Avenue#300 Tacoma,WA 98402 Philip M.Lande 9037 38th Avenue SW Seattle,WA 98126 Rudy&Beverly Starkovich 810 N. Riverside Drive Renton,WA 98055 TRANSMITTED this 6th day of March, 2001 to Parties of Record. Aaron McLuen 117 Burnett Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 Kirk King, DDS 66 Williams Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 City of Renton P/B/PW Department Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations 95 BURNETT LUA-00-171,SA-H,ECF REPORT OF MARCH 6,2001 Page 5 of 5 Artice Slemko 14415 12th SW Seattle,WA 98166 TRANSMITTED this 6th day of March, 2001 to the following: Larry Meckling, Building Official Larry Rude, Fire Prevention Jennifer Henning, Development Services Division Kayren Kittrick, Public Works Division Lawrence J.Warren, City Attorney South County Journal Land Use Decision Appeal Process Appeals of Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM March 20,2001. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process/may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. • • • • to N . d • • 11 • w _ ,. • la :U . . .. • 1 —A - 1'ETT AVENUE SOUTH :\ • V — a p 1 _ .flr N j •f•er.oltAI ftiw.l fof.ot fnP — — — ---�— c A YA►afIONfIR. SUILDIN•ENTRAN FROM �l n )4 9�Urr: ✓,TEIi��' 5,"*'YG..• If J�' •v, a.. •trTH A•r�r MU nnnwi (V cw Ada 35i 4 aumw76:i 1L`1 Tu. •, , y••.r.,;•. • ` .I �o r x. /7 a�t• I. Y, ry., ,414 4 5 M 1 1 •/ Tf c y" ,vte_tphifiyitE?"1,,,etiq,;t:,,,,,,f,,,,,"7r r� , •a'w�r7 *;7/f�- P�t%" t'7 `ii�i� __ �a n v+ nt .O • %//� � I/ �S� rf�'zinis rx r v!� , .� ' 5 ...+.•... I I / �/, o a t J $ / / ;� 1%/ I / ,gfrw ,%/ , »i•%// 2 i/� # % �+I. r / I�`:1; ,�� A4 � ��tr", Iy1 F of- i� /in =d /% %1�• 1T/I � PROPOS ocou�o � eA In ln 44/ ../..k to- .. ,. . o 1 1, ..1 . ., . .. .0 , . .._, -,., 60-, er 4 4 itiO ri .� F`n5st't,'1�t�P r;�,. + �ij r ?�.,', ' ` d�j/ �i a j1,�"v�Y/ r�, , im«,zS�'n T ! /c' `.0 '"+ r"�+. ...... .i e .... .//�/./� 1w�ai+..T{�,yt N .� ! rr .fit.:,.. fJ) . PRISM �r.rxt ¢d�.•Pt PPP., 1 •TPT..••I1 ,T,T ` ''•• •,• ♦ FOR MIIC DEv[LOFt4NT anIXDECAF! Mr f.M••1•rf. 3 PEDESTRIAN MALLCONNECTIOH .• 10 FROMBURNETTAVENUETOPARK ^ ' q • • Q `.I wlWlN (Y�y� Epp g• 1 • WMWIf •`• .1 •$LI EC Q) SURHETT PLACE SOUTH A Ili • 0 SITE PLAN • . f—CO /OYA UN m E..O Propel To If 0 0 UTWU PA o•.•111 PO MAIO Ill Q MTdf.hw II.7fol 0 N ORe Plot 1 Approval In • 3 Al• l 0 LOOM AVENUE SOUTH MO • • • • • N mi TILL" AMYL?LAM • ` y lAT.o0N/1I10 tlIW �yn�tolltti SONS — ..Ow NRLIIITALWN ADM 711" Y u1IT M .NOW te1K.WOML MRLIwaI -� .. tL WN tOAUDDt r- — I _- ...—i—_ _ A.. Itla._WR tL�IY. F= r :.. .--- II—.II%' 7=II F.II, - — 111-i..II ,war:, im� ,I ----w 6 z II Iii 1 111 u m!!' _- II ii I r l ul f•■ fi r mm ■.■ l'Mill imp fhi!'In 11111, _ no s !®®® m4t ®®� I ;UM.: __ �® Iii1 lid 1111 ®® Iiil Iti1 liil Li ■��� p`�t` •_ _I_-1-1= =f_1.= =1_I= _I_I= -1= = 9= ■fir = __ 'um, tool LIM - L-►-^ � era •; ❑ ❑Q -I 'gal■ ..,..�.■sp❑ iu r.16i I ❑ ❑ ❑ 00 00000 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ A ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ I ❑ �?�i . ::�r a) �' 111 � i- I�J r. a a■ :F s ' : . : • L; v,1: i''' :';II i, i I I Ii i I1 �k lel.lr .1,I I.I I. ;I.I`I:�IvlF ,. - O OMIT ALIPL.TW ..0001 M `.LM PP MI rMW Pt}.IL.MIIDIM. 1 • PLR WI MILL WA �1^1 o BUILDING"A" "LIMO"'*"°'°' 0 EAST ELEVATION . o Q SCAM,npr..0 M • O • . a 1 dt ' / MIAOW VIM N.W P?M. w Win N.It 'D -- -� IttTK t..r M,. t.1 L. In �.i:{ltV1LL '4- _ MTAL.IUNDA,a 7- tPeT Y �A=11o..“. ..-”. _"��� n.. .\II.-`.:.: ' .-.\`il...ll- =' I...IIr!....1 TOP.:HL - - I Frn .�Il ■■ ■fa■ of ii ■ s 11111 ii ii 11 Ifllll 11 O I`��`CV _ ■Pli 1 On lid Inl na ;Al 11.1 it it 1► 1 ■■P 11 i1 "_ " 11�11 PITH MOM Ili e. T ID UHLISI.LILI ... .... o .. ... .. . .... .��, uln ■■ ■■ nln ■■ ■■ ■�Iln ■.■_■t■ an 1n1 n In Eiji 11 --®— F- p .rT�:.sl a 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ■ ❑ 0 O Tenn.;,�uw,5i'sr-..'�---- ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ - O p❑ ; :: ❑p hDJ.a1 teem • O wo�.i nn.n 1 111, 01 1f IIw., I`f'�1 P 1./I/� `!.i' 'hJ,I IC!�',I I.Is. HI,I FIt• let •.'r it 1® 111 i .,�`P�I I11 1 Ty, wumrw., (NI dtt,4l1 • — ��. L'� 1 -- L=.1 �,i1y Rom.�aRc�a 10 o Du..nt uvu- e.,K PAW! Q IItTK.4101M. • KY,.TOIII.OMt.100YMNl. OPUSO LM r IMMOCAMS m LRn M.T "aioR. "aw.Mg OLID,oarnn II M MU R PAGE f.T.l' • C.4. BUILDING"A" • e11iPlt^ T WEST ELEVATION Approval O .Cfl.rr A5■1 . 3 0 • • c� Fp�I LOOM Mali A TAdttM,l!•1L»,4. A. LT OPIUM i NE CO •T� NO MOO 'PM Mil NM.MO .Rn✓ATO1.22I NM POPO MAL OLtlOM. COMlww sn-TTAY-----I-- II ter■— • ... .... ., -..�'II■..IV:.:: ---all..■11=z== - �11.■■II%:: !mom Tor.u.+cL I f - - ill ! 11111 I.y 7:r1 ■�■ 1u!"lii1 ■■■ ■■■ ■■■ 1u!"1i_ ;•1.-. z ,,= _.L__ _ _== = I-1- I I_ -= I __ -== 111`^ _i I_i 1111 _ ! II 1111 5 N.4 PM, ®m Y ■�� I Iit 11 ®® Inl InI 11�11 ��� 11 ®® ilia 1�° ® ma 1. ® _ I ,■ I .... 1:: 1::1 ..I:. 1..1 1::1 iiiii ■■■ ■■. ..I:. 1..1 G' .. .: L..,! 1 la — in ems:,:, —`� ... ` .I-, I k�limir I:I I NI tI.1'•I-rIs�t I I.I.'^I.I■I .I;1•1"I�II■1 14I■1...=,■l.I It■k74:.■..i.. ....' ■ _ p 1.7 / LNat».rtNOt VIM CPA re"o.— 0 W MU M.III ORYL wrT'Nr.r • W O MLR MR DMZ ROOM . BUILDING"B" EAST ELEVATION oSOARy1P.hp O -- bwNO�l N A"T4LT n4Teo • wrLt»w II Cil TOTAL e.r4.MIL IMP • / MRL.L.DOW MAL ALCO ML f 1 Q — � III. il►.... ... ...."Il. lls%� —`�I. II% � `Il ll: . . ���I F -- ---,o'=L�—s �= e I. EL 11 _ _ I f _ rn LL Ill 11 1i 11 _�.r IaIi1 III EWE GE NNE Iul7�ii Nu Inr .I:: 11111 �'_ ��� g I _...�_R... = GIs �� N LMl = 11�11 l- ___ Ill ® �MOM ® ® ® =1 i1 n1 ®® 1�1® 11�11 Lill In1 nl i �■t�' ® ® ® � ..i ....I (91 —_ I'-�I ❑ ❑ I♦�A ❑ D ■ ■ b ■ i ■ O • ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ ■ O ❑ ■ w Lj ❑ ...=AhA Ate' ilit I - f _a ❑r Tr• - r ❑❑--.II�'ut�II I ijl —%..I_ t,iiI + I■ 31■ ■1v ■I I■1 Im i 151 ill 1: 'ImIs*I� mI ;,,inI ►i,` 1_■ � t f Lini...tai . Project Tom y., wllp. I..ss{ k.l.l I. 'I I'°n Lr.:a I ITi. L +I l I;. .� a L ,.! 6, ., r':1 t, {:. E. R ® I I 1 \ l'--.-.....}riT 4' WO woo W 'I40{uHL PUP IrOPP T9 VIA nP PILL T.ownoow / ` LM a DOOM N0. . �MAALL MNN.WMM1 /Mlmro VIA PAP PILL O MR Ma.mR OAP • MLR MP MOIL CUPP CLOP TO. O BUILDING"B" MTo....IL T. 6llt rUn N WEST ELEVATION Approval c '°��"''� A5.2 • . • ID 1 1 N Ir r...uJ 3 • T OMA� a.w G n■ur' _::: urn ./Tnr.uvu ... ... 0 ❑ ° '" tar.uvu ' 7. 77 `W"� nun z -i_'' i'' limmmnnn ® _mow I11I11 Nu W TONR00.1■L.JJT ® _.G2 •-, +TGJt■.ROOIT■LJJM• R --'-c-'=• m 1 = ® Ii !i ®® itIIIIII m 1 11; I1 I (11.I Mini ; _ �ti ,. S e tC/1.ROM■4 NJJ' it-.e .�-•c ::rnIw. —n. 1D/.iK e n.tr ❑ ® ® (®® ° DD OQ ° ° 0 lag ❑ Q U C� ❑ W A �u.0 1 tII ❑ J11 In 4rnnnp ■ ■ ■ — _ 1-03-arrr, ■ '�' doiwuD uvu ` rwhYt/Mu MI Abe FROMM%Jwt 14 O rooeO10V■MMU.* Ww.■t tw0�1 BUILDING"B" Mt». ,..■ WEST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION &SECTION THRU COMMON AREA � .rxtr�nr.r..• to .OJLq we., M O M ! !1"C) ■L JLO 0■L JLY t l!i 14 4 tD/lDel P.P......,.... tn�w■ ` 60`_A�1 aim ° rim I.I O A 1=1.0011 n.wr 0'�i iii■i etaJ wte°■R N Nu�� ❑ in ° Hull ° - ® d eJ a � ® ® ® R ® f tf1 iCIYMn.m.RAW' it :uHl rn ° ® ° ,- - - ° ERE " 11711 - ® II ■■■ II F O TDI.TJt/0 tLJLT D 00 I IS tarrxu am ❑" ❑ - , -- ❑ fiP d �`- no Propel Tean o e$ �,.. T I °,� I � { I ,. ,,,. II�VII■�II�'lI�IIr1I1IIIb •,r�- ' �,, ■ 9 ills 7 T--7-1 ...=ro a..I,.■ 0 o■ouo LLv4 1011011410 MOPPED MIDI *MI m a O a c..w.1T,tW N BUILDING"A" Olt.rlan . t I SOUTH ELEVATION&SECTION THRU COMMON-AREA EAST ELEVATION ApI"e,Jt N .It„r.rd A5.3 OD sum IM'.T.D• 3 1:\Dwgs-2000\200019\200019.—A5.dwg, 4, 03/05/01 08:34:10 PM, KENT, 1:3.14286 ,, 0 , nig i iiP IP 13 ?I 1P 1 1 1 Ii 1l 1I 1 1 -= -- -- __ -- I I 1 ''1 1 7 03E7 EM jj : 11 • L ® ® IIi111 i °Jo Ell ,1: I Ell En s 11 6 COW �I'fill: IA: . 6 aC uil:■ii;MI I II::■ `sif■i � u v e =Z 0 D 0 �i Z i D D • ``r • !tj, m lov?t.m Dr 0 .. '1 :i, 1 I11,: �y■I O -liii,■ :s O I ,.,I■ „r■ JL■r I ---;--�-- -- -i ---- _' I- I. IL . _ 1 .• L 1 1 1 1 1IL I I 1 ' P =1 Zip w,iP 11 111 Ill f • VI y 95 Burnettroom KS SIR I 0 y-. 4r r fill i I u Ti.11 l s.H Jrrutasts?ue 7 olo�wtar►a1 sr.s „•� y a:a e 9 ,,,�. PDs Prope►ties,InaRenton WasFiigton I —SFE"S'AEET L1-1 FOR IARDSCAPC ••_ •--_-•- _ �"jsl�' • 1. fir. .;pZi' ., •• • .. t7►�t ,r.,.: N,a �""""y ."+�. "�" ,�y v: e Y r . �} E e F Iti { 1 (•1%ice_ 6.4 -.� .. , .. /LYE..........._--..._ 'v.4, F' a t° •'rl{ ...`. • �Ktc. ''4 ! ��.'=__. ,;0 R r7n+• ,2 _ d •iV;�E: Yr�,� ,� 'a ,��3x: .'+;-' •r.;:`v`;>@ '" i. e,r^ h' `P.'�.sr x= ::• � r , h',v .;S� " z,7�1 a ......,_. ire; �v,;x,* i. ¢ e»`�Y ,,,w,�pyyrr 9 e ':i==_ , '•(E:! z 'tk sAt'�"Yi k �'i; , ' ,). , ., , i _ + .71 1 v'fr•, �° _ - �.j� ..t 7 .� R•�h e%Cj ,F. "+K•�.T��.•p ...... ,y0 .• .�l• i,4•t' :Rj. �. �r �= x:: \ I tlY"IC"Y ?� egg .,5?: 7f-':,�. • �+!•�:...: .:... 'k .sir tv�'��yi��� 4 �14fi.: �'tti 34';x �;,,`� -!�er '^ Y .� �� � a �t r ��" =��� ��` y ar.•r it� s �' ,�, rr ;;- �'G Rf' 4 �a + ,'.,1. =. 1••::1•.� t3� �.,3 � �n � Y� r•I t 'e X: • n" 1 T 1 t• .`1tt{ �y . 'F�Va lr i M1 Y.�b'w.c., 1 F 1 .. ,M1 �. i; ° n #�h r '::::is 'lit/1N ,�.'..::::•.. 'S�} � ' �'y ;�'h ; 5n., {y,1� �• ;.?,., tl... sy Y('.. - .u, ?'•k� .uy h !f,i.wf a' L +t !� 1 w�f �k!� d �� N�`Jy� �j' :�.Ix y, ..� o .^iK � ,,; R>f`.t h. �..�,::::.. t fi ( ,J71. �` tw y y ° I .c :M:r ,�`••� i'',`�•'iS. sJ y, •ri• '',�,r...,i •.,5 ht ° t 7C v y4 S`Xv" I .7, "+',. 1 �� ,sr `a � ,,.' °� � ' �r y<f• A° �4��,letitil.�,` .� t ,... t r 'ts. � �• 3 �� •4; b _ !� i 4;,•'.,�a`t l tit,. ;,,,..,,, r,:a x.< ,,?., y,1 hyiv,��,.., . "z`{','.'+,,,,.xrH2, , qF y u�.,„, a 1" �'tx.E' ° , r +,ri., ' .nu •� ,.y l�t r � vy'J A: i il � i �. � \ / J ,i�ltiU � �� y� Yil Fib � YM 1O ♦I 4 `e.' ' a rw'y N 1I • i .. • r4; .,S ,.; •at6 }1! ti s i � +D a . is 9g k,r S1 Cz r 'o CI .. �T. ,)� 5.. . , ca r. ^'H o,.,• } l 4 , q 1.• ,-•, `_V•� yC�.r,.:01,6; 2' vr' i. +#L �i 4{ G',("' �ejd' `y- 11.,�..•.Tx:.+w,^7„' � yl• 1'' ) Ja. :*le !1k•• '•'' c 1, P Y' a 1 �•4, *' .1.!4•='4.. --1- /`Z �� ,1` tc4,,,, �A.h• • 1t7 e f .. SJF`f f44,q r ,4yy ,1vah�±� ,,� .., T< i 'r•; � "nn`v r� � a 5• i� � T r ,fy`r �.J!t1 �,`.i 5t y. ": '�Fi.;A.:37s:. • � >E-�•1-% ';� �,� �y, , 7. C. �• _ �,,. { 'rsl�'^t h'j y� I � �,,au���• oas rP :,• e ,}!E� 1K' {., ° ''{ ' { �� ,j' -e1 t.`- ,rw .,"� �..�,• ��, lily t/ .,• A,r.'"A 4'4 l..r4` ,,. �$.. � .r�r,L r• .°''1, i;7`��, '� a� �'7 , �1 � �', �b � �S^��y 1 !3" •a", , ^ S.,- a: ',"2f• Y!': '�. . . r C .T "4' !` ,.1U'T•Cf2t 1 ', R.,*,#•V i"k.„44{ �+flt• ` 'ip°" t i° Yynr'.it,' 'z fin'r3 : ie• .. �, rat b n. p� "��. 'J, .3 ,4� ,..L "j��� )� l .�y � PY 5 �� Y1 fi ,,�t� f �j (YN�.�`y'iw. I4,.Y S`� �, � �t t�.:�Y.�2...s r.*Z4. }•`;a,,: Q'Q ay- n .C,°".'SC, _ " T{• �4'45? <,,,? S. �4;5NI .jA, +'l. ' L f ! J ;x.. '4 - v {'y.." x. v •k. �iP�A. y1. .!^':.�+s a y `' it f { .F r U 7c S t+r:,,�. d,.,•;o �. fit, ,�,�' ,�., �r..., -` ,�O . MA'°' j�' - k'-�wv ,a.+,a a=; Py r"�!y. n./sWroi"G/ h: cr,{''{`"?y ' / •� .�� k, anti,.0 1 r•.t.b,'C+•;Jt°Y..,^' j` - c°ii.,t'11 `J:,, 511�1 h IOli ud• qp: "'iV,`��f 11,^ �2V«t ✓ ,40••' Y�k. _ • Ire" ��-..r.. -- �I 1�!� , ��� �` -�r'.R7 k lb. 1(2Y 4"r S,.err+ Y,ri ! 11+r1J[•ti drio"r' .41e1`u,.c<,!A n.w•. 0 0 0 .....- ta -,....ii,i't90, P 0'- 4,1 • , \\ O f' �! `Da.IR1.LA.11AR `�L--•—_. •^ r� 0.. • :Cr�_r. •:i•;; J,., . Key PLANT SGWEIDULE• . 22.... 66I6M1114'Nar. Common Nan. Qty. Mrs Commana ° 6+16.6.m 4400HA O .mama Apgar 06 64'h • ..rakJOW entaa Ja.aM..66.40 O. 1 Vl•.a1 • .H4041.11 ,y.r net.. PO a W4 m1 al • ,. Grimm;Nonv Mewls CC 2Urr1 77" • t1 .. ..........."...• ,...i.RMI. eThewa w1 __ OO__- - f.!e.AJ•. .n..e ± g 1116d6.1.,fw1'Dora Aalatee Da.Ma1.16 PerC.Mban OO ..al aoM Y7•apr ''1`•• 1 •.o', 1Wi.ar d..aara r..R.a.1a' Comp.t Nmwlg...raa AA ..al.an1 rime .,'.' I"..1.. .Aa.w'166.L.....'n' .n lour* .te m•a •p, ;. i .�4. i ' IM.MreYae 11Va re 112...21.4..rla.n CO fO'Wm.• P •" SYMMS&Ma Y..mvi.i. C.m.a..11.261.11 lh..... OD 6 vl..M r OOOC YIN,..Om *AP...r(I.q'Vire.* O. far It..r.n 2, PALMA,.n maim. l...Palm OO fa• a.Own E. Afj /��+ ��{ �� nnnnn woo..von R,M..I.4..06"... OQ �• ..a.4M k dICG2O1'1'�M� � IDpmtll�ifllQ aOMlf� UUV hellrwtur Yl.rWY Y.1..Y.0 60 ]I• alTtef ifi n li are N ea.al a.a aWn Or04fldesYar. MCC?aW 411 1a1a M.K W 1q MaM 7A HOW (M)/.1.4H am.anAl Pali Iaai6'I imel en a�Tsi77��11 pama ti raced 2 oaf eon •4•en u.usi ... I1.e4ro.alll bpn DA.VIa f•mar a.m..0 fl•... °i m, 3Y:tl1Y1 .I 1 M PAWKNOW N mar a am w ]a•a .+16a..rlr �.�Malmvphl m at.Pal LIAl,fa.ldc as 1 el AA.. a! . YVIOa mYl.' WU.Wr Mr.a.a N r.a. ]el AA. sae.� Dttgn -..".mar...LAM DevelPome ;,t; LANDSCAPE PLAN-STREET FRONTAGE AND PARKWAY /� LI. ( •—}— d1a.2%Tram •aes Tres MvawalMl Man LIB fa.p..lm and Mai . T. t' I 200019 • • TkN (iv ittli. . o • • _ , ., _ Via _. . _ .. UIIIIIIIII 1 r,,011:=114igif ' ' • ','' 1 1111•;:zrzzL5-7-_-- - f,` �•� �: ter:: w • • 1�. ::zgi=:s;:.:I'll r •• ' .r +.fir Ca e 4 UPPER PATIO-PLANTINGS AND HARDSCAPE �:,•W 0 a soma Ur-r • »h•�.._.— i.;. i.; °- Pei • 0 HARDSCAPE UWOUT-PEDESTRIAN LINKAGE nopaTam Maier ea4 Id • PAM MOM • nwm MI •�}�y fat, Fop ciao nl en (D 19InIp [rCZZ rrri f-IT planrA amen....a1* �Ilyj�^II land.aap.ar .o un•.. .w opm paUon DuIi 416 tYN M Me.WI IN err•-..4 Me OM ilitille Development • L1.2 . 1 200019 a f • 61000Z v...vw l -^- WWI.ii&iw7S,-A!:&:EP I `^/1{{ (Curl SwYoa 01341,1111) vsy,�^'-" 7t7,iTi++" -.._..-- p01YWDt ��, ,._^...,...^� cpp,ISL • sum I 10.1-i1 —'I _ _ 6$J .._.-.---� _��....�_-� ..-_-_. .-�.�._.. ._. ull.. al, pl "``�~ NY1d II]M3S AUYJINYS ONY ka.YM Vail W MAI 1 1�I gyp} 11� y� . r arm aaY1W �• oj,Cry� s$9 }!F p 1 1 InollaF ."4 iv..a,....t4 lvd >Q Nr'1 �Pon a-^..1 I • p • LUIPZ*1 SO;IOW A .+x 1 • mN .'] simulacra.swswlaA "__-ni- Ty y-" } .I I / r• L--.. .- . MUM.1g11W11i.NM IA I I RC'', I _. : AY 1c11.J1Au1+uWrl/w nlirito &I:kr g \ _ . �IR►c.Fy 1 ,�u.;:c rr� .'prdicm �)♦i '~'MU- 14 J _=: N h . - r� ... �1 kfF.: • �_ �� zcwr•,c ., :.. )♦-�'^". cif fi ✓ • !. m. = - warns, u .i�t- I�,� .a. . Irt.1 I �imug.E . 9 1 Kv 4 ' 13 ...5 ,N.. ,1 ?:,:iriv:;,1 I tg:.,:;,--:—isim",. .c.- ,-",., ..... -,, e -8 SpD•M S! i'1 f10310b i0�NOOIMBY ( y..:t::,•r W D/i0 NOOVMIAA al r. i ' AI tl WI J` so iG Ji00 S�VOIOY [a7d ER Im]w w cal - -_J ' , 1 .. 1 1 I' / !70Y y p•-- re � • � ....__- t'•�;:r.,�{� - �'Ir�tilhfri�AYtltl � � 1��1 11„ �0,It;j �,�,,,.,,,,� �'C N ._- 1 �II�%IMPIr11Yl��PKAVI l�0��1��1�1��1���1��s71i'�'l� `R '- ",,—,cos- - >!.. 5AY17d.A01 t•n .._ y�c-�._....�.u ��! 1� I vw.:wl Uul.Ilw.swl...c+svr.w.Ic+A:w....N.u....�:.ca...;�l..al�� _ V 1 f--"_—r'-•.{� ., ,.a r a•rtri AID AFL. xt /orna ---:!•.:. 1��./I •♦-•-FDA. $ FR�•I ,rim_- ^OINI M$ 2{ / Js rL \. �""'0010 JO.Ocl VA �+ ^ �, .y6Z116 { 'KI 3 U1.UC.ION ^t--, D I i as.-.-.-..-.,.....D 4.$1 1N11]YU 1$00 7.I ✓ —, --mar.-- _,_ — •' . f �..T_ ...Y.—�..._��.-_ __ _..i -.� -"�• _ i I, Y •�— S() 7 i,�,f, I CMS JO Mt VN I I •— •— —..—, -oatir 1 VM _ , M R M I }'- , NUM 00(1) y O/WdVl () o r+ saw 3YU 1L001 I +f 1 — ( �( ,1 O i ! �it°u+1 AxA U) {U7 IA'r1E OWNLL }({l' �1�. / • }�'�, I xnlYl ml t" II ' T149W9�14 01NN1 Ax {� Ali ! yW_ +" I DaIeJD Suer. y4 a :. rt1M1+M f v. law 3111.1 rl'x { bl, • r I r^ v., I$ ' r 15%.0'F5 Wig'ltd.0M nl„T i • I . /.... .... I i i I i 1 I . I I i •�' (JDh•.% pt1 moo an / I 1 I I (OO/f, 'Si`):15A'a. q.10,.11M Yp4Ad CM-- • , . . ... \ \ IL ( P ) ' , - _ .J_....._, ._.. 1 --- i\l" • , . \ .. ' \ \ / -'..... k.. t 703 ---- .-j- _i_ --- -,55 -. - I H (P ) R- Z(P) 1 \/ „_...._..... Airport Way -i. R-8 T-A-.-- .... OA , 1 1 leleM % i.E II XN2X/ \ Fi ! 'Al ----I ! i ; *AI ---c7 ] — .. 71 . bli. I‘t,', -:- ! :--iRrq ir--1--- :tyl- ,„„ __ RM-U \ ' /X i ; : ! ' i i uru 9 .mcg \.. • ...\ • .1 I • 1 Rr: I ! 648 ___ • • 'A . ._-.4 ir% 1. _..... • ji -_-a- :::: Z 5 `r6 ; - ':j ° C-D ---I R_'r-U I\ . 021 V CD (P ) -- 4- ---- ..1A-0 • H ______ ......„ , ' • tiC —• Pi H.— — --— CD a / —• . S 2nd St. L---.:. S 2nd B-if.'' ' . 14' . : .... ,.••••••••••• 1 -- — — . -a -- --a ,-- — ,--, -. - 1---1-P21-1- , L'. In .--:::: --ff - IS 3rd Sti I 9'1 tir4 ' 1 .- rf .'' --. - --F-_, --7 - • , i1 ....1.2........ .........rt ...11. ......-% ; ; • - - : ' t•J re"— I I ; 1_ • 1111 O cbicA I .0 icil I op i - .... )_ . r• __I 1::.--- .1.1•1•MISIM/1111•••••••• 4•11•1•1.....'......... . • ) CA DB CD CD 0 i CD --- CD — - CPC • — CD -- --- --- -- --- ) CD 77-)-- cp .-n- —73 _____ ___ ____ __ ,. t =- -6- --m- *- na55 -1-- , ›. --g-- • - C- , - _ - - _It. I' I) -1- ce ° .-X-I-. (.0 6 hif k ��u #f CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator .i Li:1 `✓ tl a'�- Ei .a u �_.�.J NOTICE OF INFRACTION Date: 03-09-2001 Infraction Index No. CO1-0110 Location of Infraction: 95 BURNETT AV S Owner(tax-payer) : PHILIP M.LANDE Issued To: CRAIG LANDE Address: LANDE FEED CO PO BOX 1736 RENTON,WA 98057-1736 An inspection of the above premises revealed infractioii(s)of the City of Renton codes and ordinances listed below. The City would appreciate voluntary compliance or corrective action completed by: 03/15/2001 Be advised,however,if voluntary compliance is not achieved,a Civil Infraction Citation MAY be issued,and civil penalties:assessed in the amounts noted,for each and every day or portion of a day in which the infraction continues following the date and tithe°set'for.correction. First three days of Infraction: $100.00,per day. Second Three Days of Infraction: $200.00;per day. Third;Three Days;of Infraction: $30Q.00,=;per day. Each Additional Day of Infraction: $500.00,per day. CODE SECTION CITED: R.M.0 SECS.4-2-060I&4-2-0600 DESCRIPTION.OF VIOLATION: ILLEGAL STORAGE OF MATERIALS,PRODUCTS CORRECTIVE ACTION: REMOVE ALL PALLETS AND MERCHANDISE FROM PREMISES.YOU HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THIS VIOLATION BY NOTICE OF INFRACTION COO-0076.ALL PALLETS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE REMOVED OR CIVIL INFRACTION CITATIONS WILL BE ISSUED BEGINNING MARCH 16,2001. • YOU HAVE ALSO BEEN REPEATEDLY WARNED AND ADVISED BY THE RENTON FIRE DEPARTMENT : INSPECTORS THAT STORAGE OF THIS EQUIPMENT IN THE BUILDING IS ILLEGAL WITHOUT A CHANGE OF USE.YOUR CONTINUAL NON-COMPLIANCE,COUPLED WITH NO COOPERATION,WILL NO LONGER BE TOLERATED.ALSO TO BE REMOVED ARE THE JUNK VEHICLES STORED ON THE PROPERTY.IF THESE JUNK/INOPERATIVE VEHICLES ARE NOT REMOVED,THEN THE CITY WILL EFFECT THE REMOVAL. Issued By: ROBERT L.ARTHUR . Code Compliance Inspector Planning/Building/Public Works Department Development Services Division Phone No: 425-430-7269 Delivery •ei o• an. , 1.9012001 1 0 5 Sou ra.y ay-Renton,W.s mgton '8055 '• Asa Thie n�nur rnnl�inr Gno%.nn..nlnrl.........:..1 nno+---.-_-_..___ � �? e•Y1:�,' , i it • ,,• .„, r . . 1, . ...t1, , , • -,, .Nallik:k ..-... •,.. , • , • . • 4 , , l'it ''' g ...i;; . -,..............--- - 4 - ......,...... S _ . .ra•Nam..., 1 , . g . .1 .. . - . . r I E e, I: , , . If \\ 1 .1 , Ns. 1 , s , . .1 0. ' ' VI t tot, tt V'V, :,,,.., 1 l. ' II l . 1 , . . 1 I I. 1,1 rill : , 1 1 I ' t.• , _111,... 1...,...,,,._ 1 1111111110LA t ......-. •, • E 0 1 1 I i 1111111 . I ,it o • 4, , • . . s • Will:'1 ...., oft 7., ''' •r•b' E i ' " •. ' C ' • - 4 —I, • V... -.4 il I:4 ... ir , hiikaftik4 . ... lt % ; I 1 I 1 k ......., • I, ..-- i,, - a 1 1 -••• .... 1 • k , . , 1 — .111 . . , 'sr '... --—,1 . I WI to. e4 ka.. . , I. II --'-`7---. ' 1 ' 1 . 1 , • . /I ... 'I .—...• ' 41t1 1 IMO . A, . , iv a 11 1,,P; m , • , •, , 1 . ii „,.. 1, . 1 L.. ;b..- 11 ,r4. • • : t i It 1 ., ... . J lijiirli / t wil J , t _ilk.--• 1/411111 4Ip 1. , 1 . , 4 1 . .. g'f • ; .11!!. i _ • Pli, I -,•-..—‘ • • i - t # 1,01 i , ,... . . - • iit %. 'I f •. i S II ' 4 I • o , 4 . 4 10 atioffir J.. . o I ll •/a., .k) 1 I op Ai III I ,1 I, w 1 I 1 _ . .4 1 I — II——: - • *, i / • Jr.;--:--. ,,, f 4 • i 11 . _ 1 .... I . ..... . t 1 t . L -1* • . 1 • - ‘It -- I . , .1 :. ka. I I i 11 t o ...., _ ' ....•••••• . ... 1 , . , . f "... . - 1 , $i. , N • ,- % I • . . , lt ft .1 ..;. .. r ) : ,. \ , z2,:-.7-.• , . ir. . - .. -,. . , lirliProPP a . . ri 1 . I,* s •. e ,� . IM yer I ' 4 •, • _ 0A • iik a. , • i.:i 1 1 i a • ..6 t i i e I 110 rI' � ■ .. 1 / 4 ( lisix. .. Itiitiif:-` • tl(p:Pfloo,a..L /ft .#1. , A , ••,,. 1 MR 6 I' 7 . V 1 + a !! l ��� 1 ' t- 1 4 yrt I '� �'� 46 ' ' .4iiiiiii' -s., -. a,.. .... . ....... . .....mpumanr7 i,61. • { 8 t r it � � i 4 i, •y. / 44' o III r + t s,,.,: i,4+ .`_ '9r' if i , i 1 .„ ri. • i. , . . ►. It w.- "4 4 i Ij. Z 11 •• 1 Ii ! 1 , o 2. t 1 1 . w . ..11 1 .. . . . .. J - ', , • , 1"` II• A ...... I t. • ....mital .., . I 0 .. r... lab .. . ' . II ift . I • ,..: . I ' .. :44'.4% . .• 3i 1 •. , . ,.., . ..,,, • . PI% . . ,: ,i; 'i •• Mile .. , is , .. . ,..111111 ..., • ituir,An „,= • , . - . . ...I .... . • ! # - t # • oi. , .:.... , - 'lobar ? ' , 1 .. , . .. , . . .. .. .1, '"'.**-- ..... -,- -•'---,2ruwar_—.... , - 4 • -k ..,por /7. "" I .i * ' :?.. ...., il i lit4, . , . . . . . , . I . , , . . . . . .. . . • cli0 . ; * 1 t, ° ° •:- , .,.f • . , . . I _11, 4 1 1 II 41C1 I 1 . .?"' ... °II i 4111.c.r ;;,'• -..., ... p#11114‘. , t . . \" \\\\\ \ i r t • it P" i ! 1\t I' 4 T ' I fti ) \ c 'd 10! ICI' j"� '' r' Ir SA �, " ..+ t `i ' 14 r r 14 r II • \ it t t ! Y M1 f It t .. 'ram ' tot It" w • {��.. r S•, ��1, • .,r 1 . 1 , i ,- ..,, , 4''s 2 4" 1 I It fil' ,,- it ii di/ A, . &‘ 4-1?,, 1 - ,,,, , . .. i K r , 1, ..:ir—St ... , , .. I •mkt- '4 -�.ti� !fit! a l ' ---� _ '•` • • ►.. 'W r "� :.. 411 {. ` 1 * r , *yes ` r ..,,4 fir,._ . ... • s • 1. { .. • ' 416. r'i1a. F -:t' I V . ' N. •. i • a .3s''+ ' i r .4 r W r.4...........,, / ,,,. . 4. lb. 4....... . . ° } f I` ..... i I , , i 4 r I it.. .r . is H I ii P ? � . *''�r'+I +} '� 4 if l- , i I • 1 ay i; tF • , I' r ' '34 , ....1,,, FII-ki f "ill't - 1.47- ( 1 i .,, ';`, 4 .k , t y 1 yea r, { . \i/ ' '...i 1 • .,a t . 44, .1' 4' I Lettiotio l',Ar '1/43' ; .''' f t ,j r, 'y f lf kc , 1 r ,y - AOil, ' '' 1 'Miir it t , A , 4 • ��* i tat , 4, 14y 4 , ; fl.' ' II if 1, {, 4\ t- ,. + •i , i I. r t . .4 H } n0. I Ai 9 yw -• x ' .. a y t � ±r d , 4 e its . is fi r tf to s r. A.:, .. tervii :Lit ,•�� . . t. . R. r .♦ ` . Ammo*. fr .4.4. ,r, .. .Air; iiit .r. .. . Y v \4�'� yr .il I .. . . • ... . .„,.... .... . . .,. . ........ .0.,_,.. . . . ......... le . - „oval . . . 01 re r.r. ,, ..., ,.. , .....:: #i. i ;0W,.. '47°44 4f . A. 1.110304 * My 0000 x i K x • • I . ,, i 44 . ''' ' 4 •a III r 11\446 .:. .,!,.0 r `1P ''YIV►, • a_ i y. art • 1, r --. »; 4.1.. r ... ( __ ate+ MO t.A • , - 111.11Lx-iimmujm- ow Polingimiur - '11,,, . ..: . .......____ ,,Mi ..11MINIL - .,r`' '',,..'' _, ..tea L: ,; 11.11. ytyt r .._r- _ t•e,_ . 11 .a44rn.111T i .. -. • 1 i. . Al_.; -4 r_ N4- 1{• • �r _ 4 111 . I lit .it #4."; M ie1,1111, ...1.., -.lir. .111N110 '1.0.- I. - :14Z10. _ .. 'T 41 ; 1 t__ t..• war.. Il w +�.' •�a11N'til� e j i 4,11111r ' ..P •• ♦*•mow. p .� u 1 P tt 1 •.f• �4 1 i_ li1 * .el ' ,, ,s AP"' *,• i • i I • il 1. . :40.441,0" .. g: . t' - .: _ - M: die:• I ` 44, / tili. • . /5 -14.. 'C.t M • ♦s ..+..-- --.. •ali...r. .4 +. - . *....- .... r r IMIIIIIIIIIIIIkCgCII' ' ,,,,I p ____ y -" o i _ • S e + I I -"' # "ix*: ,. • ill tA I Iii R • -•- ' CO-- ri (9) fr.. 1 TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT • FOR ®•FVc/�pMF� ® �F'9 ro1v/if BURNETT APPARTMENT kt AO 4.,2 00 • 0 CITY OF RENTON OE/Vr Prepared for Thomas Harkey Architectures PLLC 13400 Northup Way East, Suite 30 Bellevue, WA 98005 of w. e '-:, 17087° • ` , wcas-r�� 6. JIONAL :0y f/tjl0 LEXPIRES 12-6- 0 1 I • Prepared by AKB Engineers,Inc. 600 University Street, Suite 1122 Seattle, WA 98101-4104 December 12,2000. TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT • BURNETT APARTMENT, • CITY OF RENTON I. PROJECT OVERVIEW 2 A. Existing Site Conditions: 2 B. Post-Developed Conditions- • 2 C. TIR Worksheets (Attached) 3 D. Site Location 4 II. PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS SUMMARY 6 III. OFF-SITE ANALYSIS 8 A. Down Stream Analysis. 8 B. Review of Existing Records 11 C. Conclusion 11 IV.DETENTION ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 16 A. Sumarry of Input Data(Attached). 17 B. Existing Basin Map (Attached) 18 C. Proposed Basin Map (Attached). • 19 D. Detention Analysis And Results(Attached). 20 V. CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 22 VI. SPECIAL REPORT AND STUDIES 24 VII. BASIN AND COMMUNITY PLAN AREAS (ATTACHED) 26 VIII. OTHER PERMITS. 28 IX.EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DESIGN 30 X. BOND QUANTITY WORKSHEET, DETENTION FACILITY SUMMARY SHEET AND DECLARATION OF COVENANT 32 XI.MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION MANUAL 34 NOT APPLICABLE 34 REFERENCES • ISOPLUVIALS MAPS • RUNOFF CURVES NUMBERS AKB Engineers,Inc. T:\200132\200132tir.docWage i � 1 SECTION I • AKB Engineers,Inc. T:\9200132\9200132tir.doc\Page 1 • I. PROJECT OVERVIEW The project includes the construction of a new apartment building with parking. The site is located at 95 Burnett Avenue S., Renton, S17, T23N, R5E, W.M. in King County (see Figure 1, Vicinity Map in Section III). The drainage improvements included in this report have taken into consideration the existing developed condition and meet the minimum requirements of the KCSWM (1990 edition). The total on-site area is 1.3 ±acres. A. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS: A review of the SCS soils map for the area (see Figure 2, SCS Soil Survey Map) indicates Urban land for the entire site. Based on the soil report,these soils various from sandly silt to gravelly sand, therefore Hydrologic Soil Group C,with a moderately high runoff potential will be used. The present condition of the site consists of various commercial buildings and paved parking area. • The site has been fully developed. The site in general slopes towards the north. An existing roadway stormwater conveyance system collects runoff from the building and paved areas into several catch basins flowing northerly. A more detailed description of the existing drainage system is found in Section III, Off-site Analysis. B. POST-DEVELOPED CONDITIONS: The proposed development will remove all the existing buildings, paved parking and rebuilt a new multi-level apartment building with parking and lawn areas. All runoff from the site will be collected and conveyed to the existing roadway drainage system. No detention is proposed for this site. AKB Engineers,Inc. T:\9200132\9200132tir.doc\Page 2 King County Department of Development and.Environmental Services TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Part 1 PROJECT OWNER AND Part 2. PROJECT LOCATION AND . . PROJECT ENGINEER ':DESCRIPTION • .. Project Owner Project Name i/ZNt77 Ap44TfCA/ Address Location Z3 N. Township Phone Range • Section /7 Project Engineer- c�yeume,1/y OVA/ , P.fT. Company /41/, 0444S , iiv L Address/Phone 24/O 311 9 9on; _ Part;3:°TYPE::OF PERMIT Part 4: :OTHER REVIEWS AND.PERMITS ,APPLICATION:':". . :: .:.. : .. ...:. Subdivison DFW HPA Shoreline Management Short Subdivision COE 404 Rockery Grading • DOE Dam Safety Structural Vaults Commercial FEMA Floodplain Other Other COE Wetlands • Part5`:..SITE-COMMUNITY:AND:DRAINAGE BASIN Community . Drainage Basin Part 6' SITE CHARACTERISTICS River Floodplain Wetlands Stream • .Seeps/Springs Critical Stream Reach High Groundwater Table Depressions/Swales Groundwater Recharge Lake Other Steep Slopes .t • Part 7 SOILS . Soil Type Slopes Erosion Potential Erosive Velcoties Urban t /, f. Additional Sheets Attached Part 8.. DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS . REFERENCE LIMITATION/SITE CONSTRAINT Ch. 4—Downstream Analysis _ Additional Sheets Attached Part 9 .ESGREQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION AFTER CONSTRUCTION Sedimentation Facilities Stabilize Exposed Surface . Stabilized Construction Entrance Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities Perimeter Runoff Control Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris Clearing and Graing Restrictions Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities Cover Practices Flag Limits of SAO and open space Construction Sequence preservation areas Other Other a1 Part 10 SURFACE WATER SYSTEM Method of Analysis Grass Lined Tank Infiltration 513u W Channel Vault • Depression /Pipe System Compensation/Mitigati Energy Dissapator Flow Dispersal on of Eliminated Site Open Channel Wetland Waiver Storage Dry Pond • Stream Regional Wet Pond Detention • Brief Description of System Operation Facility Related Site Limitations Reference Facility Limitation • Part711:' STRUCTURAL:ANALYSIS. :Part.12.. EASEMENTS/TRACTS Cast in Place Vault Drainage Easement Retaining Wall Access Easement Rockery>4' High Native Growth Protection Easement Structural on Steep Slope Tract Other Other Part:13' SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER I or a civil engineer under my supervision my supervision have visited the site. Actual site conditions as observed were incorporated into this worksheet and the attachments. To the best of my knowledge the information provided here is accurate. • Si ed/Date ') 1 C. TIR WORKSHEETS (ATTACHED) • AKB Engineers,Inc. T:\9200I32\9200132tir.doc\Page 3 • D. SITE LOCATION • c r MUMMER\\I"I.k k11.I1A 711 `IMI•l1 AsN 1raOifMS�R 1-4iE NtMlrinM ,I1 k IT.trMIMaM.,./ •Jya td S< 1 �rwi� - , 0.. 1 ;F ::? ' Al 1E 74 j1 1itgn i 1$4ib,' , el r0 oECuKH 4 IFITV 41;1110 — 1:-771WeLipitT IN ,... 744111 IJE,ffi.1 Sr i' TOWN A° 11 I;W t.,, 4. • IMRE li: "-A1. 912 ao• E N * 4o A�1 N T37EIFRI 1 SOP/ ES -tliet•.i 9Dtl ` ! ! ! ! ra ...•• 4 4111144*-44,4444'r 4T nil Stia � ti Ava6r RIVE 1G. 616t1P N � ♦ AKER `-. 4,-. sr MK , �n �• . vt� Et6sM� ua �`fy. ! ® � 169 • e • t PL I MAPLEWOOD _St t F g bt rr 2 1 � 20 ��` o . A 21 - - �� \ . J a • MI $T0411Inkt a C yj7.oC�SE 7 FF9, 16��S`�[[},,{1� al+` A .. T I"•�S{t�.a� Mr ir 11 19TH sr' �:/ ,�A �� ' _ t: � r•�'`' nrzs,. sci S 19rH I• r�-�' 1 a J ST •• 4jt?7 : 4-.;:. Vt... . 1W. .- �'4� srPUG d . usr, 1 1s,._ sE Rtp�lY w �79 z "rr'NID 1 7 I N yl.1ST ST •TQ'y. 611 T•�T!Si tok SE if,. ,� —__ I 62X0< 3 ST 'y 1615T El "aE s,',b.. S,w.a t 31100 IL' ,6gp =b1_. Y1615T •, 'Y =�� I I� . SE I6350 ST P _ Y:16 sr i `. LLLFFilil] i i SE 1.• E �y vA� ��'m,-7.' ' i n s 27rH sr lo9m TH r luou T SE 164TH ^_ s .y s ! tN C< s AM-s v�'i SE I651X 94•l 117003 ritufirrila •E It 'Ti' . Kr `SE ST c .n v"i ST N'1 L i E.,,S n sw ` '• 9TH 51 z' S.s,d' .t• W ST $ SE 16EEM I. SEE 166M R: " *F 'R •••; '�' st I ST 30 T �. R Wn X I ti 'E,sE 6nx i y g OM ( • �^ S N o .. ';g^ X sE 6Et Sr �.,$€ 2 ■UNDUE • i;. S ''311Ls3T SE '< '< 29La -sE '' �ps��M 168TH I sr 1114 it' - g_E 169TH I E '�' SE E®TN �\�,,-1 M �I�1�l s _ s 169M Sr 4e v. I F — ' AKB Engineers,Inc. T:\9200132\9200132tir.doc\Page 4 • SECTION II • AKB Engineers,Inc. T:\9200132\9200132tir.doc\Page 5 II. PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS SUMMARY Attached. AKB Engineers.Inc. T:\9200132\9200132tir.doc\Page 6 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: September 28,2000 TO: Pre-Application File No. 00-104 FROM: Steve Taylor,Senior Planner SUBJECT: 95 Burnett Avenue South Apartments General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above- referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g.,Hearing Examiner, Zoning Administrator,Board of Adjustment,Board of Public Works, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The • Development Regulations are available for purchase for$55, plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall. Development Regulations are also available for review at no charge in the office of the City Clerk on the 7th floor, at Development Services on the 6th floor and at the Renton Library. Project Proposal: The subject site consists of three parcels located in the vicinity of 95 Burnett Avenue South. There are currently three operating business on the site; including the Lande Feed Company,Northwest Pneumatic Electrical Repair and the Purcell Painting& Canber Corp. All buildings would be removed from the site to make way for the proposed apartment building. The proposal is to construct a 118 unit,three-story residential apartment complex over one story of parking. The upper three levels will be developed as two separate buildings with a common area connecting them at the first residential level. The parking level would be partially below grade. Vehicular access to the parking level would be provided from the southern end of the building onto Burnett Avenue. Zoning: The subject site is designated Center Downtown(CD) on the City's Zoning Map. The intent of the CD zone is to provide high-density residential and mixed use commercial centers serving a regional market as well as adjacent residences. In addition, the subject site is located within the Downtown Core Area and the Urban Center Design Overlay District. Sensitive Areas: Based on the City's Critical Areas Maps, the siteis located in a Seismic Hazard Area. The seismic hazard is related to potential liquefaction of soils during an earthquake event. A geotechnical analysis for the site is required.' The analysis needs to assess soil conditions and detail construction measures to assure building stability. Pre-App 00-104.doc1 A Environmental Issues: Two areas of concern arise with the redevelopment of the site. Certification of an asbestos inspection and abatement of any on site asbestos is required prior. to issuance of a demolition permit. Please contact the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency for a list of certified inspectors and include a copy of the report with the submittal of the demolition permit application. If the demolition of the buildings is processed separately from Site Plan Review for the project, a separate environmental review will be required for this action. The second concern is rodent infestation at the feed store and their displacement into the surrounding community with the demolition of the building. The city has already received reports from adjoining property owners who see an increase in rodent infestation now that the feed store is being cleared out and fear a greater impact once the building is torn down. It is likely that rodent abatement measures will be required prior to demolition. Lande Feed Company is also listed on the King County Historic Resource Inventory and must be disclosed on the SEPA checklist.f Nkiecls 514 u! s reel) Development Standards: The proposal's compliance with the CD zone development standards and the parking regulations is addressed below: Design—The site is subject to the Urban Center Overlay District Regulations RMC 4-3-100, which are available for$10 at the 6th floor reception desk.. These regulations contain both standards and guidelines that affect architectural issues including siting, design,modulation, common open space, access and parking. Several standards are directly applicable to this project and should be considered thoroughly before a detailed design is finalized. Due to the lack of detail in the material submitted,we are unable to assess compliance in several areas. For example, the amount of common open space/recreation area, landscaping, roof lines and building materials. If need be,the applicant may request a modification from these standards pursuant to RMC section 4-9-100.D. Lot Coverage—For properties located within the Downtown Core Area the standards regarding maximum lot coverage for buildings are not applicable. Density—The permitted density range in the CD zone is a minimum of 25 dwelling units per acre to a maximum of 100 dwelling units per acre(du/ac). Density may be increased up to 150 du/ac subject to approval of an Admiinistrative Conditional Use permit. Net density is calculated after sensitive areas and areas to be dedicated to public right-of-way are deducted from the gross area of the site. There are no sensitive area or public rights-of-way to be deducted from the gross area of the property. The proposal for 118 units on the 56,557 square foot (1.298 acre) lot arrives at a net density of 90.9 du/ac,which is within the density range for the zone. Setbacks/Landscaping—No minimum front yard setbacks are required in the Downtown Core Area; no rear or side yard setbacks required in the CD zone. Although setback requirements do not apply in this instance, the Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations are quite specific regarding siting and design treatments to reduce the bulk and scale of the building. The same applies to landscape requirements. Although on-site landscaping requirements do not apply to properties located within the Downtown Core Area, the design regulations are fairly specific regarding screening and landscaping to reduce visual impact. Pre-App 00-104.doc\ Height—The CD zone allows a maximum building height of 95 feet. The proposed 4 level building (3%2-stories above grade) appears to be in compliance with this code requirement.Building elevations and detailed descriptions of elements and building materials are required • with your submittal. Screening—Screening must be provided for all surface-mounted and roof top utility and mechanical equipment. In addition,garbage dumpsters and recyclable areas must be screened pursuant to RMC section 4-4-090.C.7. Approval of the proposed locations of dumpster areas by Rainier Waste Management is recommended prior to the submittal of the formal land use application. The site plan application will need to include elevations and details for the proposed methods of screening. Parking—Properties located within the Downtown Core Area are exempt from the requirements of the parking regulations. However,structured parking spaces must comply with the following minimum dimensions for standards and compact stalls: • Standards.stalls must have a minimum length of 15 feet(16 feet for 45° or greater) and a minimum width of 8 feet,4-inches; and, • Compact stalls must have a minimum length of 12 feet (13 feet for 45°or greater) and a minimum width of 7 feet, 6 inches. In addition,compact parking spaces are not allowed to exceed 50%of the parking provided. The plans submitted indicate 170 spaces would be provided with the development. Although the number of compact spaces appears to remain within the 50% limitation, staff was unable to determine the proposal's compliance with the minimum stall dimension requirements based on the information provided. The parking area for the project is also required to comply with the design regulations of the Urban Center Overlay District. Permit Requirements: The proposal would require review of an Administrative Site Plan approval, as well as Environmental(SEPA) Review. .Both reviews would be conducted concurrently in an estimated time frame of 6 to 8 weeks once a complete application is accepted. If any appeals are filed, the timeframe may be extended for an additional 4 to 6 weeks. The application fee would be$1,500.00,plus$0.33 per mailing label required for notification to surrounding property owners within 300 feet of the site. In addition to the required land use permits, separate demolition, construction, building and sign permits would be required. The review of these permits may occur concurrently with the review of the land use permits,but can not be issued prior to the completion of any appeal periods. Impact Mitigation Fees: In addition to the applicable building and construction fees, the following mitigation fees would be required prior to the issuance of building permits. Redevelopment credits for the existing structure would be applied. • A Transportation Mitigation Fee based on$75.00 per new daily trip attributed to the development; • A Parks Mitigation Fee based on$354.51 per new multi-family unit; and, • A Fire Mitigation Fee based on$388.00 per multi-family unit. A handout listing all of the City's Development related fees in attached for your review. Pre-App 00-104.doc1 a ' SECTION III AKB Engineers.Inc. T:\9200132\9200132tir.doc\Page 7 1 • • III.OFF-SITE ANALYSIS The following analysis consists primarily of the Level 1 off-site downstream analysis. A. DOWN STREAM ANALYSIS The downstream analysis is illustrated and detailed in the Downstream Map and Downstream Table Attached. The downstream analysis was performed on 11/22/00 under sunny weather condition. The temperature is 48 degree. The downstream analysis began at the southeast corner of the Site at the Burnett Avenue South roadside catch basin. The catch basin is connected to a storm catch basin type II with solid grate at the centerline of the street. The runoff follow the existing roadway storm system path to the north • approximately 185 ft. to another storm catch basin type II with solid grate parallel to the site road frontage. The storm drain then continue running north for approximately 230 feet to a storm catch basin type II with solid grate. The storm system then turn 90 degree to the east along South Tillicum Street approximately 170 feet to another storm drain catch basin with solid grate located on the west side of William Avenue South. At this point, the runoff turns northwesterly approximately 50 feet to the north and discharge to the Cedar River. The downstream analysis terminated at this point with the end of downstream flow path. No outlet is visible at the time of field visit. This is based on the as-built record plan obtained from City of Renton. • AKB Engineers,Inc. T:\9200132\9200132tir.doc\Page 8 i FIGURE 3 SOIL MAP • • lir- ii 1 .,4 • j ,i,...,,,,-;.:<.:, . L [ 1-,, ., ,i,. / -' 1 :'-.-...n1\ta,::. 1,:.,z- I I 1 I 7 /..' ir:ik' r,I • rE'' '' '''' 1 Ill'Yik,?.. .,,,f.,..:.?:.‘"..r ...,.t; Iiir I__HIiF1 �� 3 , o p: ����T1�■ r ,, Lct" ti ;. � • ,: i �_ �it;71,4. .) V t: f • „.„..._,,..,,, :,,,,......„,,,..,,,. , .,,_ t .__,,,,.........„....„,_ • • _.,.. .,,, ,. _,..„ *4 tiv..."'•'. , c"--.4. 1- .'-"rr,.7 :, ,„'i ,..,„„ ----,„• :,..: .6, \ v ..4 t `'V��j�� 7 �r I , - ~�Y- • -f�a•�,y ��� �m.•I d 1%'i a.\\ ��Rh. �- .., st ji..-�yf S+YJ. ((��./' W.a! �� •\z� ■ •1• ♦ �jl��i lA I , .F+ %I', v''''4'i.l'"X '4,;':'‘N4----:::•••?1N4'116.54A,G-'4 llei-41 '•:•.4.s- - *-","ef:%,....1::•"g;4111e;;r"15.4] 1 14.1`1,,,k0S. '..-..-4:•' . sk4k.4 s .,i il: iti i } 2 . — %"` +�:fiJ;3iL J= k TT 1 { lac, \ \cvi . Ii:,I'4.1%11;1,44' / 'ii.'; .:-.7it'..F.,44—',;•,r,g."--"3e4,..-.4.,..---l'.':.:i.::17„-:-.%-11.•;‘,'..:'.1?.-7‘.:!''... -13' •-•.k ' w - ' 1 1 ' I 'k.' . . 'VIA i '7‘2,.." .• ,- i" 1.. 'et PF5 \•::'—f.'7.i: :!-•=,:' 1 , P erry'^! t"I: I f< 4i41-`5 *"r•0 't }A,\'-✓'• 1A': derv._ - x; ORT >01- �.�/�.--.."'1- •• 1Fst •4 R'� 'y „6 ispy�.w �„o Y'•�t�a�'" r 01 i �' r i •+d ,l l OA‘rd YY " Y' _ lP a=et- 111ld� .3 141 1 , . -pm, -; .�n Jt`•I r,..i-'-t,•r411 a,t•i.rk,e fir!` "' - A- >' 7+ if - _' � „ 'T.�• ti 1kj t � 4 liZi '",:3,,,sr•, •.„RIM- z?---,.'1 i ;it ,6_,,,r;41,1:4...-1 •• /4, ••',-,. • \ ,••• •••••”,. , • vit ,71.'4 .:-...c • , � I• ' 7 / L ),:.••,, , K fs a ,., , ' � t 1 -' ..,,,,,, ,-.14,,, "te t Ytte DI f' th & :i�'• a i! i °$—"1.+� 0%/41 ---- _ atr z.':• �,t; @"'• • I / - I� sue` � . Jri .}, r� r :ti.• f _I.- •Pv ray s+ i'sy):I' I,fi ild Ml9 \ " � i�'1 �����i\ j• AKB Engineers.Inc. T:\9200132\9200132tir.doc\I'age 9 ,, t • • • FIGURE 4 USGS MAP • • ::-'. ''' ' i ' \ ' N \ Is l\, ).,)c)i..6_ , ,:": WitiiiiL ,A, ,,1 . r. AN 1 i! • %.*: -E4r. a .,.1 , ...N. '-] IP % •f :�._. -.�, =.ate �1 , ': * .' •• ��., 1 . 'I., \ .. :•....:: % : 4/1„_ . - , %. E T0� - � ti • _ • .V140., 1.1���'•�'t 1 A R ORT` 1111�� -r } I -f //I��� `'��4; ....:7:44 IL_ !Ail.; -* 'El!' ��- - kli,11 o! .- --- •�� thletic , (—4;iLl vi gypik ��. , - - iv ? , , Ill. , 1�.!�;‘,..ijjy_ilr — ��r, - �i. � I v�. .� rf�".►♦ ih�_. 1.,,,. ,ii�.-____ I�\•.er':,�.\, / F,��`'�:� vex i, • . . - --. '=aseb:, ai / �IJ i Cemi ' � Iv �.:• ark t .il.. } \ - -- ./l/rii,iiz1R.! 1 1 • ....4.,,,, ,,p,___,,_ ,,/„§„,),b„„,r.--....:,:;....5; . .go 116,11 . : wrj,".4001, "-,,,\ / .."--: -.,......_ \...." '\,Th\ : ..„j- • -1.-----.9.,.?,40 ,0„,• —•.-2 arC. ;. . 4,,,...,q,. ,&,, „,K,11,..,,,,, es„,i _r, . ,,,s,:, ,.. , --„._ --yr- . .c• ..*A..., :.. _e.e:,.- ._. .:, ; !_,1 1 1.,,,,..14r.,,_,.„.till ,.,..„-..-,,, „...,, 7.7.-5 ' .- III IC' Pli I . 1,\ _..1.,..\ ,..7,--.. :_•]..1,___•:, :-.i.-.t-;;;;.. r_. -R7->: • '-74'..-111W---- "yr. -.‘' III 4, ti: ; 0,,,,,,-- - „ ,2,4:„ \ ... _ _,. ., . . . •..a1--..' tillr-. --jr,A .... L,_,........,7=—• —=_ ‘...,:s '13 • ! p. 10' 1 II 0.?,,-.5-?:. Vs. , wP.• .-/' 11 -/ Ill[irt ‘ .... :11.: rse I'` 1 :4if A 1 - % aLa__,.•�/� t, ice•,. • ., - _ .,,,,,,,.,,_ . „ --A , ( Ewa ge Srs Y • .,., - - :. . • Li 1 ...i-7 ,4 'PrfiecitiltiLikm..111. ...• ,:;--1.--- .-o:- -- i 1 1.1—./.31: • 8M 16 P. '\ ;NI ) :,'-''..:•...• r• -`( „EIS:'\ . . . •• II •• . tr. !, , , , • .: . . .. �•;\• / • t..i.,. — •■. '.. ` . • ;. -,III Rom_, \ _ .. •ivz, ir . \ 'i ;i��i! / 6. �•• n. ■ fly •:t II Iiir MR track ='• 'I \ • °gri ' - PI — = Reservoir i I / • ° ` \�• • IL AKB Engineers,Inc. T:\9200132\9200132tir.doc\Page 10 B. REVIEW OF EXISTING RECORDS Included are sections of the King County Sensitive Areas Map Folio, which indicate the following: • Streams: Cedar River is indicated downstream from the area of concern, (See Figure 5) • Wetlands:No wetlands exist in the area of concern. • Erosion Hazard:No erosion hazard exists in the area of concern. • Landslide Hazard:No landslide hazard exists in the area of concern. • Seismic Hazard:No seismic hazard exists in the area of concern. C. CONCLUSION It appears that the capacity of the existing drainage system will not be significantly impacted by the proposed development. Problems noted with the existing system consist primarily of maintenance issues such as sedimentation in the catch basins. No other major problem was observed at the time of field visit. AKB Engineers,Inc. T:\9200132\9200132tir.doc\Page 11 FIGURE 5 STREAMS& 100-YEAR FLOODPLAINS • • • • AKB Engineers.Inc. T:\9200132\9200132tir.doc\Page I2 P L.Ij , I // r .._. ) i!ji ,, Kam!_ ►F_ t;/ .al:,.-.:, , ,,t-ifij:;,..i.I -..r. .k ik, . , ., . , . .•,...,..Y ri, air.,„-4,,.. �- ;- ,. f. • .- Nj -_ �y : '•ram I 1 - ''").--! ...7\ f., -.t.....-k•-• . .)5,,k‘,/ • z= r�',j}• is - f... ;• •••• i.:,. --•17...Th.r.'? riFT!, ..:;,-.. .. .4\ ‘•• \- ...:::,; .'‘...,',immizon'• •• ..s . Af,:,-.. ..:i -i':4'.-...-77.1---..;:mig..6.,-•:. ,,•_- ...:••'41,- ...\.'\‘..\...',: ',11.' if. ..."1-7':..i..:• ::.;.;••••.• .::::':"- ilist •••4'.. ., 1'.7'.,.Mit ,, . I sme ...A;is,-...... .1 • 1. -... \ � tea ' ii4�;:r � �s >... I;�tl1 g s0 `'� 41 '- , "..'•.77-rt..''''''.--;,..'nje..41?,1.: • 1 ' ,/ ''" '',. • ...V. ••••4"--- ,R;41 n51- BE •••••(.... ..• r--- ••••,/,',11111. -: ••• • •• • - - ...„4,..-/•.‘... iv..I.L.,L...is ii....... 1111 b .R :.e. c • •� • \ •I.- F. C.• 3 1' : A 3411rat • I- ....s. -ti` %a t.. " )'' -� ,�(�1--fir r!.,.. ����'' \ ?. • -r \ • _ . '. �_ - .. � '■r� \ I •• Ili • • 'I. h , I .-j iLl.y\ ` / i -,. 'rI Ili! �f '`'•' ` 11' -_ 1. .,' :..-• ....u.,.., _ \-)... .,. i .,_,. ..• t 41 "t snal `- •if - - �; ! :F l ifi` ' —�-'`r ` 1 • _ -_ � :' 1 j.i.•Vex-, I \ •C� - - 1 I. / .. 1 , `: '�►. , r1 \ •`, _ ,� d be• - - - Class 1 Duwamish 4 y Streams and 100- -._.__e Class 2(with salmonids) N the ••• - arns. Class 2(perennial;salmonid ?��is Year Flood airs (� c3. :',8'._ use undetermined) a Class 3 .r'7;r�_•- - — Unclassified • APPENDIX "A" DRAINAGE COMPLAINTS NOT AVAILABLE AKB Engineers,Inc. T:\9200 1 3 219200 1 3 2tir.doc\Page 13 APPENDIX "B" DOWNSTREAM TABLE & MAP • AKB Engineers,Inc. T:\9200132\9200I32tir.doc\Page 14 OFF-SITE ANALYSIS DRAINAGE SYSTEM TABLE • Surface Water Design Manual, Core Requirement#2 Cedar River Basin Symbol Drainage Dratnage;Component Slope:: Distance;' ; >.;. ;::Existira " "' ":Y°=:'Potential:' Oli"servations of field inspector g Component Type, Description fro ,stte Problems Problems' ;resource.rev'iiewer,or resident ^•Y;i'.C•i �dis ,ar•.e,�;`: .z_ Y Type.•sheet flow;swale.... >, �'.�> ,�.•- �..,^..t. • . ;� - •-::-.>'-• - - - Y'c'oristrictionsi,aurider,�:;•`ca aei ondm =tritiiita"" :aiea t likelihood"'of see map stream;channel, ipe,,. ,;. 'drainage'basin;-vegetation:;cover;,.•:�'s;' ;r;:,>;°lo•.;:a,> ,;z;;1 4 ins=1;32Qft''",;,''oyerto m ;r;:fiood n ;;habstat:orapr anssm:.,:'':overflow athwa s; otential;im acts, • .^......:, ..' . ..... .:�„ ,..',:.,.�::...,.._ t ,,,w: ..t:?:'e•',i:<.: Z'.<.; ;.',; y.,:.':`;,...�..,. '::F:�':.0 and .Size;diameter .::.:_; ;;de th. e otisen dive area,volume";:> >.,.- " ; r:h- _destructs n >`ssco nn a;..bank< is ou hin surface area a sedimentation;incision,other erosion . ,. . • . A—B' FROM SE PROPERTY LINE TO PAVED AREA I% 0-1 1' NONE OBSERVED NONE ANTICIPATED NONE EXISTING CB,SHEET FLOW B'—C' FROM CB TO TYPE II CB Q PIPE FLOW 14% 1 1'-29' MAINTENANCE NONE ANTICIPATED NONE CENTER LINE OF ROADWAY 6" CONCRETE PIPE C'-D' FROM TYPE II CB TO TYPE II CB, PIPE FLOW 0.6% 29-204' NONE OBSERVED NONE ANTICIPATED MAINTENANCE ISSUE 8"CONCRETE PIPE D'—E' FROM TYPE II CB TO TYPE II CB, PIPE FLOW • 0.5% 204-434' NONE OBSERVED NONE ANTICIPATED NONE S"CONCRETE PIPE E'-F' FROM TYPE II CB TO TYPE II CB, PIPE FLOW UNKNOWN 434-604' NONE OBSERVED NONE ANTICIPATED NONE 8•'CONCRETE PIPE FROM TYPE IICBT0OUTLET, PIPE FLOW UNKNOWN 604-654 NONE OBSERVED NONE ANTICIPATED NONE S"CONCRETE PIPE • INKili...., tn5) 1 8'\ IE':-32.44 S' P.i(: 'N 'a. ' 131N1,34 tia, . Ill , • j. ,r..•/ J,I' i IE.:3 .:T8 8" PVC N&W v �, FIM.,35.72 �. J, , �__._SUrtr( Il 48' f'iR!Ck 114 �� VERY LARGE RI I: PIPE// ',/ ' :' a; RIM 31.;'.s"• �,z soR1), DRAIN 09Ir1C, IIE'i,S r1EVY FLOW 'TO :i , b?i % IE-'1.01 8' PVC. rl II `J c, RIM--3h.(1 fi- APPROX. 30' y11_EP % ^ � j `J/ IE=••?.9.2i 8" CONC: '1 IE•=3:.3.96 4" PVC NE6i1- .-.._•-•- C ; s, IC=29.1112" CONC E I I - In ,,S l .r, 2 u6 ?Y9y� �`Jp r %4% .•�:/ „I .:. ti ,l•, 1i• :o r LADDER.' W' ` n 4.. r0 i. -1 .'ia .,--- 1`sr r rF %� o 'tr"4.'... ...,. • /i .. /`/r� SSMH II 48' •A �` .3h.• !J6• I.4.1 ,,6 �g''.t. „.1 _> `i' SO s,:;,... •.r_4.....J,. RIM,. 5.91 I '�. I; # ..7 .d 3y. Ir 'bout lt:i�f!'...9')' i'tp 1 F •' ''.R.:,:�'> S►--IE•::.%,i.76 8" PVC N SD so ••,.- Irq _. , 1 ,o .v s v ;;jcl'>_s(/" Cl `s , - . E. 1 ' .1.• �.Ya'0I �r by = SSMEI !I ;36'. - ...\ •i6, I. i '' _•---- 1 Rim,.37.'_1 1 I?,K, 's� v•, /o �¢ LADDER SW VIJL!.. OF DIRT NO MO' L �t:" J6r 6R- 44 CE.'1 I BF.ICK I It i6. v •. \` RIM oEAU --*-- 1 b ``i,1 "' 0 • ._...__-� V'as'''-- \ ' ! } IE=34.60 8" CC MC W I6�' • NIry I, c13le 2' r;� x r E!w` ,.ts 1 c,, t ?I E:-34.69 U""" CONC E' RiM=-33.66 ^`\ 'sr t l'•6'J I us_..1 es11 i I I IE=�1.i.i 12" PVC S \ , •�'1( ' ?y 6 I I, I iE=31.71 v" I:UNC W \o' f 1 ,, -+'I• - ` oWv o/ '4 i,• ,. t d / RIM-•35 91 s. ;. ,, r, r 6' IV.',/NWI rr '9>. •fir i'?.. • I I •_1�..,.. E 4.7I 8° CONC. RIAI::i•i.ifl \ • • ( s•' .y? r /t`:i 1 Iv Fi i I I 1E=16.6$ ',4" c �•\ I rs r •I L�r�r/1 - r,Id' v, I'I,is '�6• Cis ** IE=•i G.;F, 14" W �""' �'�' ;`• s = 1 •>o�. __�?i-_/ ". '' N88•09_'11'W 29_9.72' _ LADDER TO 'IV I .ram.,. ,ys 11 ri�/,'i2. �'1'' I• ( J° lS -... ' _.._.__._......._ __��Y1(I «r.-... .t •,>, f•) J... I I �.`I''da, r. ..�._ 1fi I I \ 1 ...I r♦. :�?,• �'i' t. a o" I ', i r,A� -•--•-- _..RIM-36.14 \ :fp ,.4�t•�/ / ti a �, `- IE.::34.89 8" CON(: N T Jos • i'' \I p, ��.!T, • a, ' - - r.6 l B'IC1< I • CG I o '\ .� `Ti., ` - nA 1 I `i51v18 II 48' RIM:36.11 I I R1MR.:33.G7 '. _ �, I>r p • y� IE-.35.11 4" CAI.VAPII'ED W%NW • m _. 1.,:, 1; NIFd=3E(.4Ci I IE-32.07O? I ,,, F„t'i: h! i '.ram \, x1 ,(s �% ear 0.„ •61 IE:.::?o.i1 8" NYC N I ' z !t-.3'.0'7 f 2" PVC: .`i s s rJ ;{:i._ I" '_ 1 r-� I • IE=26.46 8'?• S ' IE-3::.47 4' PVC SF. hw° (' ��J� ,u� rj _`flS'__s _rn `�i (�., s _ - , ' IE.-25.38 Ci" PVC E I ra .� --��' I ti, SSW I it hK'•S y LADDEE; W �.,;z. )) �,1, 1 RIM.-.36.67 I `SSMrI II 4E' .__-_.i.-_._ • � S"y \ i': 4 -- . I �'�----- IE-27.69 8" PVC N `J <'C RIM-:34,65 yb�' 1 4; tt ., \. --] , t -IE=?.7.92 1'• PVC S I w �. IE=16.52 14"" N /f, .} N8829.12"t1' ri •� ^ If_-31.67 DROPPVC iE_:16.40 14"? E 'r �' 's SSb1H II 48" IE='Y1.87 8 ii I o r 1C9.50" ti�- RIFd=36,12 X LARDER TO 'd' •s J. r6• .;_ I + I1S'16.02 16"+--, ? W • . `.3 I .�, Or. I 1 i I^ n.l `� SDMEI Il 18 liDDER SW " 131A1+=.34 3Si �,, J3'9 \ ?;` I i� ✓ r j* •..`_ Ru.1:3F,.76 IE'::3 .!i4 1: PVC N `! ;; ! s, ; ' RIl 130.33 8 COPS: 11 r� ty, :� I^ N !E.>,iO.9f: 9' fa1/O E I a > � y h7 r.� L '2 , �� 1E�=.30,31 1 CONC S '� • . 'S'^ 4''.r - -,J7.9._12"N/ _ J6, 1,7 _- IE-:3. (' v 1 rp' 1Q9.;C)' � •✓. I ..CBI 3.4; 1%' AU., A I { u t, 2 f;• • RIM-36.25 .rs,, I 6�, J ,t., ..�1 JJ �i O.,I !F:•-34.25 12 ADS E I •p w •\''‘,S, I o`'-a --• I l d•'O I 1 ]]J=i 0{.0 I I t .I''. i•'` 46, 1 I I 1 I. ,�yl ,)6, I , \ ,tt %T`' R 1 I L 'cs 1<t 1 Ih �I I �I • f. j t ,; i r J, 1� I I I I ' 6, S ` Cry ;"I, tV(i') ' -III r n I \.\,,,A-. 1 r� (r' iU4 ` 'ram l iJI a Cs RF CB 2 0.4"a X (1 fs E'\11' ' I "v t',., I 'h F �..I RIM,:;;^ /lJ i' ',^p�j; 1 ." � / ,I I IE-a.5.E3 6" CONC E O I F ,' `' 6ts .1q1'. 1E...35.54 (i' CONC w I v /, ni 1 y kt \I I, �.1 I I .SDMII II BRICK s`'' ,' I I 1 \{ I Rlbl.=:37.24 l '-'I''. �1'Je 3 ) I b, II_=31.34 8" (ADP., {, 13 1 �. IE•a31.39 8" CON(. N D . ' f"A, ybl I 4. J IE-:33.04 G' u,.( E r b I IE::=33.04 G' CONC W Z 3'? ..� �'o :�, I--- e1. T, .I \ IE=31.66 9" (:MP SE v V ''/ ° • J,i, J; 1 I "---- SSCO \zE� �� `'Tss:• 'mot, `� '1> ty. --l -- I i IE.,35.i9 1O" CONC S J-. ;-,�".I /09,50' '/01 •,r. --- 1 \Y 4S • • %, .,�6? s•s t P•18,3 :9'1::'ly /.•lr j, J �� < `v,, •1 s Js J7 6 / %/ /�/l 41 �',id�� I r 1 /'7 7 \ CB 1 1 / 4 _. I¢p lie 1 • \ -.4.40 E' f:"A.: SE •--. I+� \ 0,3 i6 - 12.4 lI ./6• 47. A. Xi .l i t?s'6 7 N I 2 r, O tv '°6..1/4.„ ....-- 4,3, ';',,) i i •cty ' I I • J F • 1 t I ,t. +jr J� # s6> I • SECTION IV .AKB Engineers,Inc. T:\9200132\9200132tir.doc\Page 15 1 � • IV.DETENTION ANALYSIS AND DESIGN The following King County Surface Water Design Manual performance requirements are used in the design of the detention facility: • the 2-yr. and 10-yr. developed release rates should be equal or less than the corresponding existing peak rate of the runoff during the 2-yr./24-hr. and 10-yr./24-hr. design storms respectively. The present 100 year/24 hour design storm flow from the site is calculated to be the following: • 2.43 cfs The proposed development for 100-year/24 hour flow is calculated to be the following: • 2.46 cfs There is an increase of 0.03 cfs of runoff for the 100 year/24 hour storm as calculated. This is within the 0.5 cfs limit for detention requirement. Therefore, not detention will be proposed. The paved area that subjected to vehicular traffic is at the proposed parking entrances. The total area is 3534 s.f.. This is less than the 5000 s.f. for water quality treatment requirement. Therefore, no water quality measure is proposed for the site. However, the development will improved the quality of the runoff since the impervious area subject to vehicular traffic is deduced. The hydrologic analysis resulted in the following peaks rates of runoff for existing and proposed runoff conditions: 2-year/24-hour Design Storm 10-year/24-hour Design Storm • Existing peak runoff rate = 1.18 cfs = 1.77 cfs • Developed peak runoff rate = 1.21 cfs = 1.81 cfs • Amount increase =0.03 cfs =0.04 cfs • AKB Engineers,Inc. T:19200132\9200132tir.doc\Pan 16 A. SUMMARY OF INPUT DATA (ATTACHED). • • AKB Engineers,Inc. T:\920013219200I32tir.doc\Page 17 CALCULATED BY: CMC DATE: 12-Dec-00 CHECKED BY: ST PROJECT: Burnett Apartment-Renton HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS -Area Summary AREA: PRESENT CONDITION Area(SF) AREA(ac) Cn PERVIOUS -Open with brush/grass 3905.5 0.09 86 -Open with gravel 2210 0.05 89 Subtotal 0.14 IMPERVIOUS -Parking area/pavement 24592 0.56 98 -Buildings 25849.8 0.59 98 Subtotal 1.16 TOTAL= 1.298 PROPOSED CONDITION PERVIOUS -Lawn 2705 0.06 86 IMPERVIOUS -Driveway 3533.8 0.08 98 -Conc.Sidewalk 1630.7 0.04 98 -Building 48687 1.12 98 Subtotal 1.24 TOTAL= 1.298 1 -WEIGHTED AVERAGE Cn VALUES: Cn(aye) PERV. IMPERV. PRE: 87.08 98.00 POST: 86.00 98.00 • Note: Hydrologic soil group C was used as the SCS soils map indicates Urban land and Soil logs indicate sandy silt to gravelly sand TIME OF CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS • 24 hr.ISOPLUVIALS: P2= 2.00 in/day P10= 2.90 in/day P25= 3.40 in/day P100= 3.90 in/day sheet flow: Tt={(.42)(Ns*L)^0.8)/{(P2)^0.5*(So)^0.4) conc.flow: ' Tt=L/(60•Ks*(So)^0.5) (ref.KCSWDM 3.5.2.6) TIME OF CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS The minimum Tc value of 5 minutes will be used since the entire site is cover by buildings and pavement with very little open area. • AKB Engineers,Inc. t:\200132\20:132area.x s.:: _",'�•J B. EXISTING BASIN MAP (ATTACHED). • • • • • • AKB Engineers.Inc. T:\9200132\9200132tir.doc\Pace 18 • • • • • • • • • • • • • tars i �� _....__._ J4 (:E3 I I11/.8. R!M '•3. �\ IE•==:3::,44 w^ PVC; `,i�- /- 1 *�> IE=s?.-.7r3 8" ?YC NE.4!1> I 1 F?Iin::35. 2 • ,+�J- I 1 /----slsf,lr+ II 48' BRICK II^[ Jl;f?l' (-1,F.iir: PIPE/ RIl,1=3G.26 p'I i;r,1N}i I'l&S I•1 41 ROW 1(i %'. `,�1 I `�/ / 1E-it n1 d" PVC P1 I I any ' ,f?li[I;( I. jIt:EF' 1 .f IF...29.%1 8" CONC -.a> ,[:::33.!86 .1' 1',1` NE ... ....-. % �: i c7 i ,y''I' - j; ,;: I' i' %?o IE�•�2'.-1.i 1?'1." C(7"!r: F. I `in :'.W'ti. I. /. .. r I 1.1 .Si • :, r ADOERW N 2 �" .rt ' f r,,....;,;;,f7;?.....:; .• I I,'•,.f. !AYJ p • 1, .._..� r tjT. ,;, t : �. I + I�•�iZ$ Y , Yi j'14 ' c rI ;.�s.U4.,;, •L'," t,.'�..;3__...4. - d!. II 4n ,r'i a. ' s j .: . k5 rr sog,_,. .• .• .1 ..4,_,W'u IiIV..i';4I I 1 � • •t# p 1 a r)Ci J, i 11`:, 4 -6•'^'s---IE=i^%' r" r 1 I" ,,r)[ v4J,. 'C'rP S:'(f_)__��_'r----- - S IE,-.2 .81 S.l"i� 6`' I .-ii.r:V.) , rM+J r r1-3_L{,- -.. ..-rJ _IE-%5.76 8 PA: E, I J • 1CIhr:.37.4; ' 4.t �: y �. I. i' }•,, ¢6. (,FULL OF Clifq NO 44/ x \ ri /, •- 1 9 " , - ,��- :. 1•.. i I• iri '•1 1 r p^ II %�\ } 111-34.60 5" CGI•IC '8 I f i ru�: I. i �' «� ;I r:. �:I1 2' r/5 X 1' E,W • �, r, 1 �y-•1 I.:ii% .E==34.61 6" C:Oi•IC E • •RIMS-33.G5 'f. , • `e IE::t.71.,1 '17 PVC: S\ r., 1 :?i 'iy I II I r`� •s.. ,rs I I IE...31.''1 8"'t:I.I ri' \\+' s II a, I • •I-, I'i;1 G[ ddr 1. ti 'f' Tqw"' - k../ ii '',+ I 1+1 • ' RIM=,i591 1 d < IE-3.1.71 3" CONC ,1r/FIW :3514 1 rt y l ' .:.... • r I "I \ '.c-lri.fSp le? S �� I fi /i y 3 m �•_ 71 i�j 1 fr• l F9'10 T I • �t G, p., 1 I d' p p+ •IE.,7k'.),� ,4"0 .Sv. `.�-'. j X` It •? ii i P° • / f,. s NBBO97!'W 299.72' I LA.DL'EiFC TO ,ti 4`,`„r' SS�i v:IgC ui^ ,! l t .�i - -_"y...._s co 1 • �r it +•r. s' i >" . ' RIM-=36.24• I I. �\ II y' `rTyl lu3c\� 's .q"t --ai •' .r - 1E-34.89 3' CON> N I ! B. RI+A•= 3 I t% I, .1. i,� '°' �- __ 1'_L..•SCNIfi 17 48'• I1IM36'I1 I• tr, I IF.,3%r 3%I'•' 'r'','i,; I'd • '_. �''7 I I ly r`v�Ff a•_ =^ f!rn, I �`c ` t IE=':S!i.11 ,1" !:it.l_VkN17f-fi YJ%t!'r' _• • Ik-3"J..07 'i'r.' F1•'I 14 I' ,r_ .a„ I '�y' u„ hA I IF-20..31 fe P>C r'1 I s= ;: Ic.-,?_:f1.) •r VC r 4}' ;.� • F'.'o.� 'i�i.•_•S�d__I^_..._--- 1 _� 1 I IE:e?6.•I6 8''? ti _ r,'., ,ram. \ ,,w.J n ,:1•j (� f jr4)•-.- .---..4 1.4d!_._7-.:A-k, ._ • - __,5,. 11 • '' £ IG•=26.30 li" I'VC E. I �i `i _•._• / s� �I.: 1}:,� '� t:. r,. .._`.=_.... (L1ti._.,! IAUUEI? VI' SSW II 4is' ? i. \ 7 I. I i�frfl'I II 4k:`--- -'/ 'p '�r, ',i , �. 1.-,•,1:._ 5' F1'C. N • RIM-54.").`i '� r �' 1 .J,;, ''\ .{ IE.::7-)q„, R" F.,/i: I• :r r:; I( r,� i4` P1 I I 11Ii I ''. i/,582`e''12"i1' �' i� j • /, IE=31.(:i ElRO? PVC .. =...1 J ,s, ..,,_._;r c�h 4 II 48" IE-27.87 8"? 'IV 8 :E.1,E6..4I 14". J J r. it/9.'O' • <s-_.....4 ,;'•,% nr r I I �; '' Sn)., I ...�'+ iF :R. .ISM + ra�.v;t VE=i5.5)L Ifi'.l./_. ? F • I I `i E`\ / \6� C. I \l1, t ? •y • r ' ;` I __.LADDER SIN I I yp� I?IAf=.34.: -'I, r s•. 't .�..I` ,-> Y ."1 iC'=a2.!'i4 112" �'Vi� fJ 'a 9 \,t�- I _ `s'�� `� �/ I, cl}d ,',$.'IG I ! k_• i i J i • c 1.--30.33 8 CONC: r1 G , �' -,ip, oc , 71`; I Ii....30.'1 5' CONC•S n..� _ J6 I ,! I CO I IE=;SAG 12" ADS W1' I i1 {s f' ''' I l'' R!A1r=3f.2; • • • • 'ii. I \' '•;, I _..�v" \I.. !iO1E:,334.25 12 ADS E I - J lc, F........___. 'Ofi (.1 I. I. 1 I \ '•:r I 1 • • \„.\ � t <, ,164I R1 • ,t ' ,.r S� I I • 1 ./ ,•\\. D i I' I >v.: I r �J 1 t` J.J .�_.-. .. ..GAS-n ��'-`` I '•I 1 i.l liifh' .l; :'I ��f S,i1 •1J `1 I I il __.t ° 1 \ • 1•11 �, :i c tr ._ i.___.I CB 2' •N\5 >; 05 f`,W f ! tr G3 r RIA1- n.43 U si • r,� ?. ;; �• 11',� I IE '35.63 C•" C41JC E • I • zj f i • Jr f • t - •--C B I BRICK 1 0 _ / L r F as.54 G' rnraC w A I s \.k, •• ! I tltz,. 7ti. [�, ' p.1.,.1 �-`.;UMI1 II Ei;im r�r. "� • -� y • ! E-3i4 i448` CGN,, S 1 3' 8" G'01!C .. + G' Ct:IC. E I \ < 1 PD ,/:, i :syl 1 + •14 11 I IE=:3.04 ' / I[+=33.0 6'' CONC Iii I Jam. .4 ! f • 4 ��I -i rrs/�c� ,11, �•.... .l ••;e/ -:{ "�7; f •'•� IE'=:'l.cr 3" (:A;? 5F . r+ c-.. 1 f; .:'Sr. , • /'{,I ---.t-.__S-.:: ,, I1. I 141T.+,::.? .i1 ae di \Z • '<I.:III '1„.,.:, -its . ,v..,9.50' .0 .,i: ...,,. Jf- 111'`y `sus )\;952.3'1.; y -5i J. I` -__ ! I"I ;:',i, I ;1 v tE=3a.=10 ._ }.,.+t. SE: ,•ui 1 1 • , I. fy +`.,tl . \ i„ j (0 1 1 . . .r ,, 1 • . I ` I ' LI- • , II:•',%,,4,,,,,::„.• ..... I s;. , '-:' , I 3 C. PROPOSED BASIN MAP (ATTACHED). • AKB Engineers,Inc. T:19200132\9200I32tir.doc\Page 19 • • It^ I I 114I•33.94 -CB I I '32.44 5" PVC W •F PIA4=34.68 • I •T�.% 1 JA.0. ii IE='32.78 8': PVC N?cW II S SI.u•I 11 _ '_ \ �DA4H II 48' BRI(:,K I i RiM-.3`:•.'• , et' 1 .� .rs. \qj RIM3626-ERY Ii i ', i IE• NYARD DRAIN GgING 1•. y�� J ro s \ 4Mti ) / 2. RIAI-S4.91 ,tom. IF.<= 9.. 8" CONC S -3 -• AFPI Ux I l ` ,% I 2" CONC.: E. •• IE=33.96 •F' PVC NC 1 % `' / ` to , LADDER W I i; r Z. Js °r,,• I jl'i i5' 14 r� .5,, 'S> -,i SSA41 II 4 C1 w; t9 it ;: '.-....__._.____.___._-...-_ ._-.__.__.- __'•9'. �'tt •i<S Imo` r.. � " "1b4•,t, `'' �,y� ' „ i xb i RiM=35.91 I C-, J7 rJ. �, T u , i,l 1 , VO.W'r; N1-. -4a- -_ r , {� o :, +Air =P •' -IE=2�.16 8" FM; N ; r. u to _ .,. ,. ..� , IE•-25.81 8"PVl'; .., t' y IT, I '•.__I, �I,., :.I '� >' •- c-o .ix. r�:Cy.-.. - •IE�=%5.76 8" PV'('�E ;yl ',1}I1 . • d1�� .:J. .. IE=_?5.71 Lw M1t II36' '--- •s: '' ' FULL of DIRT NO MD" , I _ -�- :71 i ▪ - - .-3r,.z,tr- r ,I z l'r� s,'+ tx�� p,' IC 34 6+) 8" CONC W r I $$ •, .i, I I t ?� j t I + L1 e, 2,n .$ "2 /S X 1' EiW I r- I CB I--------- _ !J, r I • c i-oj', wt.111 • ,To, 1:=34.6 6" CONC f_•' RUG=33.66 ` I Ty IC 31.61 12" PvC A 1 • ° 1 i' -C6 I IE=31.7I 9" CONC W ,, At , `, I •x`•�. I `6 3Fi 91 s vT J t#• p' co �' 4. RII,{ % r` �- y+ IE==34.71 8" LOU,. W NW iS; J5, `t �� I, I ` ,` >AIH II 48"-.... ,\L 7 ::;'?;• ,. (% ,, ,(•` r� ------1 ._.> RIIA=•34.10 �\ I • �.`y, 1 I rl^ r r Th Qt),6. 15. •tE...10,6F; I4"? S ', I % ' °Y i cn t ram,. ,.� cr h !T `f�_-�� A'BB'C,1_Ii f4' ?9F1.? __....--. ---N iE.,16.76 I4 `N % T;(r. __.--- - - _ (� i o kIM'^.i6.l.4 1 .- rr'.N✓�•`�' :7'I'' I I s.` p: _ - IE_.34.89 8" LONG id II • u V?J �,�m�, 1:,I -CB I BRICK :$ I �._- 1_ o i '_I„T + 55!v1H II 43" IE-35,i1 4" G'ANANI.:110 W%N1") :_ 1 r� 5 , RIM=-36.46 I I '� H.EM=3 3.97 �' `To' J 17 - N •' C IE...32.07 12" PVC N f '•.$' '., 1. r?: - --1 .__. 6 IE-7.6.3, P,C. • ID:32.07 12" PVC S . 1 , 1 fp/r- I 1 IE--`/_6.46 8"? S r . 1 i I :_•p.36 8" PVC E I Z IE=32.4'7 4" PVC SE «`w,{.t 'a / __. _ ;3 --tr - • <. !ADDER 'N S SMN II 48" =yj ,f� ,,4 . .:ASS _-+ff' v II` RIM-36.1i7 ~ 6', 1° x, ' �•_--"._ 11 > IE-27.69 E;" PVC N .71. �` .9 :t�> .tot ----• .,I IE s:)7.G2 3" P�/L. J 8.8MH a 48'-------t--- At s i. \ 4"-- IE=31.67 DROP PVC D RIM=34.65 { • pJ,t�.P 1'1"• _- • .• �� I, IlrII 2- - SSMH II 48" IE=27.87 8"? 'W I v IE=16.5? 14 N y1'; I I RIM=36•12 _ Y (/9 < ti IE:='16.4U 14 E r -r •::Y• ,t . • f I E-15.92 16"+/-• ? E • LADDER TO W ''9..`1,,, I • `4 `'af i%::" J't _L ,'V I • ' y '' 11`. '1 1 -16.02 16"4'._/ ? W i N. LADDER SW _-_ �..- Jr /./ �` -la'' N°�O '5s'' I _ ,----SI)MH II 48" • � a C$ I r -'�._, jJ. I+ '-is ^i ce+= I 1r, n 2 4},; T�IA9=36.76� ) c„ a Z RIM='34.3e --- - Y -=�-' ,./., I_--30.33 CONC N 1 r - (h v IE•= 2.54 12" PVC N ' `/� ' , + ` I •+' ' I IE=30.9G 8" PVC E ,; s o • t �; tE-30.31 8" (:OIIG i y; o Imo:_ ;"29'J o"Ev C$ I IE-33.46 12" ADS W / F. RIMS.,31.'S • I • A ,T;ns, rl nj•W. H. ... .;'s IE-34.25 12 ADS E � 'm 1.. - -1 c: , '/ "''s I • k a iI I - I' I \I\ )ri ' -1---... ftiz "i? I .... tii Z I E 1 1 �Q1 I 1 i ..\ : • � I � " 1 - 1 61\y-te .4.., ss, I I:Li.• 1 1 . 1 t• ° C) I. cn IL• . IT �•ce ' N\5 X C1.8 E\1N ▪ I RI1a=.3P,.43 ' ').\{ (1.1 F �" _.i �'li I^1��-, `� I tE'=:i5.63 CONC E ▪ I 1 T;> -U °L ' .11�., 1 \ --_._-CEl I BRICK. • 36.84 i:i \ o c7 v to 1n •� V � a^j� r?' ' ry e•�. CONcg7 W cAi25m • J\ d I ,..1 `-----� _ be, i -SDHIhI II $RICK z t7 _ - m ` I 'IIRIM3'7.�4�, ' 11 t f' I �v. : j 1 - 3 �„_ \' 'I IE=3i,34 8" CONC S .� y m c7 m o O o I .t ' ,, I I : 2 to ' IE-.:31.39 H• CONC N 1 \ \ '� s i 1 I I IE s33.04 Er GOPJC E • 1 N o r�* m b6•, l J 1' I I EE-33.04 6" CGNC W' T, 1 1 po z Pvo ,i �.�( • _ E'31.6ti 9" C#dP SC • is i• 1 • Q vc#i= .�I F I I ��- 5�GG • I Ij. Rim=37.31 ,n �+ , _, ,,, --... n iw`tu` rn y 0 I�z r ~ yd '.,r y -r - l • f I: n' 1 Al, p'�v s'• ,?i � 1 1 •i 1 .,. `rr' I I+I • 'Ili"C' 0, 2. P 1 a I .,. •T6. N98 '9 J2' i� Jf i(1 1 11 r N ti ,9'I'•••• / ! 44 •,o I ,s. ' ep •T• 1 CBI �.\ ‘ / \ .,y °'a - _ -- _ - _ _ - E -- _ RIM=35.90 41, ( ' It. 5, T 1 1 IE..34.40 8" PVC SE --'`\ 1 n W•6 ) 'V''' s \ -1 •o ..r ;, I _-_.._.. - - .... - - --J .�y, t. et + �:-,,q `` I I I I cr 1, tc" gotry ° s wltlt� • a e tplip to ,,��'r'' I 'ig ! i x ,,fer.temm. • • • / r..‘A4' 1 I I 1 F DI a _ i r� I- r.Tif,1 , . DATE BY DESCRIPTION'fir I{... 95 BurnettI11 NI1N II THOMAS•HARKEYIArc6lfecfeI" ji _ • _ .. II "�151 II13400 Northup Way, Suite 30L _-� „pt Bellevue, Washingto+ 98005 I nI = =1111••••••• --.j�{.8-. (425) 401-6828• Fax (425) 401-0630 PDSK Properties, Inc. Renton, Washington D. DETENTION ANALYSIS AND RESULTS (ATTACHED). • AKB Engineers,Inc. T:\9200I32\920013_2tir.doc\Page 20 r � • 12/•12/00 3 : 20 : 51 am AKB Consulting Engineers page 1 Burnett Apartment Detention Analysis AKB Job # 200132 BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: 100de NAME: 100yr developed SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 1 . 30 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1 PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 . 90 inches AREA. . : 0 .06 Acres 1 . 24 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10.00 min CN • 86.00 98 .00 TC 5 .00 min 5 .00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 PEAK RATE: 2. 46 cfs VOL: 0 . 39 Ac-ft TIME: 590 min BASIN ID: 100ex NAME: 100yr existing SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 1 . 30 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1 PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 . 90 inches AREA. . : 0 . 14 Acres 1 . 16 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10.00 min CN • 87 . 08 98 . 00 TC 5 .00 min 5 .00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0. 20 PEAK RATE: 2. 43 cfs VOL: 0 . 38 Ac-ft TIME: 590 min BASIN ID: lode NAME: l0yr developed SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 1 . 30 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1 PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2. 90 inches AREA. . : 0 . 06 Acres 1 .24 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10.00 min CN • 86 .00 98.00 TC • 5 . 00 min 5 .00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0. 20 PEAK RATE: 1 . 81 cfs VOL: 0 . 28 Ac-ft TIME: 590 min BASIN ID: 10ex NAME: l0yr existing SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 1 .30 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1 PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2. 90 inches AREA. . : 0 . 14 Acres 1 . 16 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 .00 min CN • 87 .08 98 .00 TC • 5 . 00 min 5 .00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0. 20 PEAK RATE: 1 . 77 cfs VOL: 0 . 28 Ac-ft TIME: 590 min r , • 12/i2/00 3 : 20:51 am AKB Consulting Engineers page 2 Burnett Apartment Detention Analysis AKB Job # 200132 BASIN SUMMARY • ' BASIN ID: 25de NAME: 25yr developed SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 1 .30 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 .00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1 PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 .40 inches AREA. . : 0 .06 Acres . 1 .24 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 .00 min CN • 86.00 98.00 TC 5 .00 min 5 .00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 PEAK RATE: 2. 14 cfs VOL: 0. 34 Ac-ft TIME: 590 min BASIN ID: 25ex NAME: 25yr existing SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 1 .30 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1 PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 .40 inches AREA. . : 0. 14 Acres 1 . 16 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10.00 min CN • • 87 .08 98 .00 TC 5 .00 min 5 .00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 PEAK RATE: 2. 10 cfs VOL: 0.33 Ac-ft TIME: 590 min BASIN ID: 2de NAME: 2yr developed SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 1 .30 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1 PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2.00 inches AREA. . : 0.06 Acres .1 . 24 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 .00 min CN • 86.00 98 .00 TC • 5 .00 min 5 .00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 PEAK RATE: 1 .21 cfs VOL: 0 . 19 Ac-ft TIME: 590 min BASIN ID: 2ex NAME: 2yr existing SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 1 .30 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 .00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1 PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2.00 inches AREA. . : 0 . 14 Acres 1 . 16 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10.00 min CN • 87 . 08 98.00 TC • • 5 .00 min 5 .00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0. 20 PEAK RATE: . 1 . 18 cfs VOL: 0. 18 Ac-ft TIME: 590 min SECTION V AKB Engineers.Inc. T:\9200I32\9200I32tir.doc\Page 21 V. CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN All runoff from the pavement and roof areas will be collected and conveyed to the existing drainage system along the road. The proposed conveyance system will be analyzed up to the 100-year design storm event using the Waterwork program. Calculations shown in the following pages include all the proposed conveyance systems. The "Catchment Area Map" is based on the proposed site which shows the proposed conveyance system and contributing areas. AKB Engineers.Inc. T:\9200132\9200132tir.doc\Page _? • SECTION VI • • AKB Engineers.Inc. T:\9200I32\9200132tir.doc\Page 23 VI.SPECIAL REPORT AND STUDIES Soil Report attached. AKB Engineers,Inc. T:\9200I32\9200I32tir.doc\Page 24 ULN. ' -..GEO'rECH May 20, 1999 CONSULTANTS. INC. JN 99132 tinrrt.Sulk: Ih 1415,7,11-5'I`t r:\x(4:5174140M • Lande Feed Company 95 Burnett Avenue South Renton, Washington 98056 • Attention: Craig Lande Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Study Lande Feed Company Site 95 Burnett Avenue South Renton, Washington • Dearivlr. Lande: We are pleased to present this geotechnical engineering report for the Lande su Feed e and subsurface Company site in Renton, Washington. The scope of our work consisted of exploring s - conditions, and then developing this report to provide recommendations for general earthwork and design criteria.for foundations, retaining walls, and pavements. You authorized our work by accepting our proposal, P-4849, dated March 22, 1999. The subsurface conditions of the proposed building site were explored with four test borings that encountered loose fill and alluvial soils overlying dense, gravelly sands. Due to the potential for unacceptable settlement if conventional foundations were to be used, we recommend that the building loads be carried on deep foundations. On-grade slabs can be used, but should be reinforced with steel bars to reduce cracking due to differential settlement. Pavement sections should be supported over imported, gravelly structural fill. The on-site soils will not be useable for structural fill, including utility backfill. The attached report contains a discussion of the study and our recommendations. Please contact us if there are any questions regarding this report, or if we can be of further assistance during the design and construction phases of this project. Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. James R. Finley, P.E. Principal JRF: alt Z0 'd 0290T0t.+SZt, S1331IH3Nd AaNNVH StIWOH1 Wd 172: Ze 00—ZZ—NON • GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Lande Feed Company Site . 95 Burnett Avenue South • Renton, Washington This report presents the findings and recommendations of our geotechnical engineering study for the Lande Company site in Renton. The Vicinity Map, Plate 1, illustrates the general location of the site. We have not been provided conceptual site plans, however, we were provided with a copy of a King County Assessor map. This map showed the property dimensions and adjoining property bou daries. Based upon our experience in the immediate area, we anticipate that the site devdlopment could consist of a multi-story apartment building over a main floor occupied by retail space and a parking garage. The main floor would be close to the existing site grades, with no basement planned for the development. • SITE CONDITIONS Surface ,-., The site is a relatively large, rectangular-shaped parcel situated on the northern portion of downtown Renton. The provided lot map indicates that the property consists of one lot. Burnett Avenue South and a City of Renton Park abut the east and west sides of the property, respectively. The southern and northern adjacent properties are occupied by commercial buildings. The ground surface on the property is relatively flat. At the time of our explorations, the majority of the site was covered with the Lande Feed Mill building, asphalt, or concrete. A narrow, rectangular piece of the property along the western property boundary was vegetated with brambles and low-growing vegetation. A chain-link fence separated the site from the adjoining City of Renton Park. Existing development near the site is a combination of commercial and residential. A house and masonry garage adjoins the southeastern one-half of the site. The garage is built immediately adjacent to the Lande Feed building. The western one-half of the adjoining southern property is a commercial garage, within several feet of the southern boundary. South of this are older residential and commercial buildings. Within several feet of the north boundary of the western one-third of the site is a commercial building that contains Northwest Pneumatic. Subsurface The subsurface conditions were explored by drilling four test borings al the approximate locations shown on the Site Exploration Plan, Plate 2. The field exploration program was based upon our experience with similar projects in the area, the site topography and access, the subsurface conditions revealed during drilling, and on the scope of work outlined in our proposal. The borings were drilled on April 23, 1999, using a trailer-mounted, hollow-stem auger drill for Borings 1 and 2. and a portable, hollow-stem auger drill for Borings 3 and 4_ Samples were taken at 5-foot intervals with a standard penetration sampler. This split-spoon sampler, which has a 2- GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. 20 'd 0£90T0ib+SZb 51031IHONV A3ANWH SHWOH1 Wd Sc': ZO 00-ZZ-AON r • •'' Lance Feed Company JN 99132 May 20, 1999 Page 2 inch outside diameter, is driven into the soil with a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches. The • number of blows required to advance the sampler a given distance is an indication of the soil density or consistency. A geotechnical engineer from our staff observed the drilling process, • logged the test,' borings, and obtained representative samples of the soil encountered. The Test Boring Logs are attached as Plates 3 through 6. The four borings encountered 7 to approximately 25 feet of loose, sandy silt and silty sand below the surface cover of concrete, asphalt, or topsoil. These upper soils appear to be a combination of fill and alluvium (river deposits). The geologic maps for Renton indicate that much of the area in the site vicinity has been modified by past grading activities. River channels have meandered through various portions of Renton since the last glaciers receded. Beneath the alluvium and fill, the borings found dense to very dense gravel containing varying amounts of sand and silt. These gavels were revealed to the bottom of the borings. The final logs.represent our interpretations of the field logs. The stratification lines on the logs repcesent the approximate boundaries between soil types at the exploration locations. The actual transition between soil types may be gradual, and subsurface conditions can vary between exploration locations. The logs provide specific subsurface information only at the locations tested. The relative densities and moisture descriptions indicated on the lest boring logs are interpretive descriptions based on the conditions observed during drilling. i- Groundwater Groundwater seepage was observed in Borings 1 and 3 at a depth of 7 and 10 feet, respectively. No groundwater was noted in either Borings 2 or 4. The test borings were left open for only a short time period. Therefore, the seepage levels on the logs represent the location of transient water seepage and:may not indicate the static groundwater level. It should be noted that groundwater levels vary seasonally with rainfall and other factors. • CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS General It is our opinion that development of the site is feasible from a geotechnical engineering standpoint. However, since we were not provided with information about proposed redevelopment of the site, and, as depicted on the boring logs, the subsurface conditions are variable, additional subsurface exploration appears warranted following demolition of the existing facilities. The test borings conducted on the site encountered loose fill and alluvium overlying dense gravels. The loose soils are compressible and are potentially liquefiable below the water table. To prevent unacceptable foundation settlement under static building loads, and in the event of a moderate to large earthquake, we recommend that the building be supported on deep foundations embedded into the dense gravels. Due to-the presence of potentially caving near-surface soils and groundwater, it appears that augercast piers are the most suitable deep foundation option_ Vibrations from driven piling could potentially damage surrounding structures. Ground improvement methods, such as dynamic compaction or gravel columns, do not appear feasible For this project. • GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. b0 'd 0290T0b+SZV S1331IHO21C A3N21CH SCWOHJ Wd 9S: Z0 00-ZZ-AON e ' lance Feed Company Pi 99132 May 20. 1999 Page 3 If some differential settlement is allowable in the lowest floor, which will be used primarily for . parking, a slab-on-grade could be used. This slab.should be reinforced with steel bars to limit the potential for a Kcessive cracking. Number 4 rebar at 18-inch centers placed both horizontal and vertical in the flab are typically sufficient. Wherever possible, the slab should be isolated from the pier-supported walls and columns. An exception to this is where interior and exterior slabs lead up to doorways. At these locations, the slab's reinforcement should be tied in to the pier-supported foundation. This lessens the chance that a sharp downset (i.e., a trip hazard) will form at the door threshold. Arbas of soft subgrade soils should be excavated beneath slabs and replaced with structural fill. As evidenced; by the settlement and relatively poor performance of many pavements in the surrounding area, the near-surface loose soils do not provide good subgrade support. Gravelly structural fill should be provided beneath pavement sections to improve their performance. The near-surface soils are generally silts, which are unsuitable for reuse as structural fill due to theiLsensitivit' to moisture. Utility backfill and other structural fill will need to be imported in order for proper cgmpaction to be achieved. The moisture-sensitive soils will be susceptible to disturbance under equipment and foot traffic, particularly when they are wet. Quarry spells or a similar grave4 material should be used to construct access roads and working pads where heavy equipment traffic is expected. Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be allowed to review the final development plans to verify that the p-• recommendations presented in this report are adequately addressed in the design. Such a plan review would be additional work beyond the current scope of work for this study, and it may include revisions to our recommendations to accommodate site, development, and geotechnical constraints that become more evident during the review process. Augercast Concrete Piers • • A igercast piers are installed using continuous flight, hollow-stem auger equipment. Concrete grout must be pumped continuously through the auger as it is withdrawn. We recommend that augercast piers be installed by an experienced contractor who is familiar with the anticipated subsurface cpnditions. An allowable. compressive capacity of 50 tons can be attained by installing a 16-inch diameter, augercast concrete pier at least 10 feet into dense strata. For transient loading, such as wind or seismic loads, the allowable pier capacity may be increased by one-third. We can provide design criteria for different pier diameters and embedment lengths, if greater capacities are required. The minimum cerjter-to-center pier spacing should be three times the pier diameter. Based on our test boring information, we estimate that pier lengths of about 25 to 40 feet will be required to achieve adequate penetration into the bearing soil. We estimate: that the total settlement of single piers installed as described above will be on the order of one-half inch. Most of this settlement should occur during the construction phase as the dead loads are applied. The remaining post-construction settlement would be realized as the live- loads are applied. We estimate that differential settlements over any portion of the structure should be less than about one-quarter inch. GEOTECN CONSULTANTS,INC, S0 'd 0E90T0*+SZt' S1331IH3NO A3NNIOH SOWOHl Wd 9£: Z0 00-ZZ-AON Lafide Feed Company 1N 99132 May 20, 1999 ; Page 4 We mown rne d reinforcing each pier its entire length. This typically consists of a rebar cage extending a p rtion of the pier's length with a full-length center-bar. Each pier can be assumed to have a point of fixity at 10 feet below the ground surface for the computation of lateral load resistance. The loose soil against the piers can be assumed to have a design passive earth resistance of 00 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) acting on two times the pier diameter. This relatively low passive p essure is intended to account for the potential that some soil liquefaction could occur adjacent to pie rs during an earthquake. Passive earth pressures on the grade beams will also provide some lateral resistance. If structural fill Is placed against the outside of the grade beams, the design pasive earth pressure from the fill can be assumed to be equal to that pressure exerted by an equivallnt fluid with a density of 200 pcf. i Seismic Conf iderations The site is 14ated within Seismic Zone 3, as illustrated on Figure No. 16-2 of the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC). In accordance with Table 16-J of the 1997 UBC, the site soil profile is best represented by Profile Type SE (Soft Soil). The loose soils beneath the water table are susceptible to seismic liquefaction during a moderate to large earthquake. On-grade elements, such as slabs and pavements, would likely undergo significant differential settlement where liquefaction occurs. The use of ieep foundations to support the building should prevent catastrophic foundation settlement that could result from seismic liquefaction. • Slabs-on-Gr$de The subgrad soil beneath on-grade slabs must be in a firm, non-yielding condition at the time of slab construckion or underslab fill placement. Any soft areas encountered should be excavated and replaced with,select, Imported structural fill. The use of reinforcing steel is recommended to reduce the potential for differential'slab settlement and cracking. • All slabs-on:Grade should be underlain by a capillary break or drainage layer consisting of a minimum 4-Ifich thickness of coarse, free-draining structural fill with a gradation similar to that discussed la(er in permanent Foundation and Retaining Walls. In areas where the passage of nvisture thrdugh the slab is undesirable, a vapor barrier, such as a 6-mil plastic membrane, should be placed beneath the slab. Additionally, sand could be used in the fine-grading process to reduce damage to tile vapor barrier, to provide uniform support under the slab, and to reduce shrinkage cracking by ifnproving the concrete curing process. Permanent roundation and Retaining Walls Retaining walls backfilled on only one side should be designed to resist the lateral earth pressures imposed by the soil they retain. The following recommended design parameters are for walls that restrain level backfill: • • GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC, 90 -d 0£90L0b+C7b RTO r THONU k INW-1 SHWrII-I I W.-I J c! ,-a as-77'-Anti i . r , Lance Feed Co;Inpany J'""" May 20. 1999 1 Page 5 r-- Pnrnmcicr Design Value Active Earth Pressure' - 40 pcf • Soil Unit Weight 130 pcf • Where: • 1. pcf is pounds per cubic foot. 2. Active earth pressures are computed using the equivalent fluid densities. • • For a restrained wall that cannot deflect at least • I 0.002 times its height,a uniform lateral pressure equal to 10 psf times the height of the wall should be added to the above active equivalent 1 � fluid pressure. The values gi I en above are to be used to design permanent foundation and retaining walls only. The passive pressure given is appropriate for the depth of level, structural rill placed in front of a retaining or fo{lndatlon wall only. We recommend a safety factor of at least 1.5 for overturning and sliding, when ysing the above values to design the walls. The design v flues given above do not include the effects of any hydrostatic pressures behind the walls and ass that no surcharge slopes or loads, such as vehicles, will be placed behind the r" walls. If the a conditions exist, those pressures should be added to the above lateral soil pressures. A'so, if sloping backfill is desired behind the walls, we will need to be given the wall dimensions slid the slope of the backfill in order to provide the appropriate design earth pressures. y Heav constr I ction equipment should not be operated behind retaining and foundation walls within a distance equal to the height of a wall, unless the walls are designed for the additional lateral pressures re9ulting from the equipment. The wall design criteria assume that the backfill will be well•compact•d in lifts no thicker than 12 inches. The compaction of backfill near the walls should be;accomplisied with hand-operated equipment to prevent the walls from being overloaded by the higher soil fo,es that occur during compaction. 1 Retaining Wall Backfill Backfill placed behind retaining or foundation walls should be coarse, free-draining, structural fill containing no organics. This backfill should contain no more than 5 percent silt or clay p rticles and have no gravel greater than 4 inches in diameter. The percentage of particles assing the No. 4 sieve should be between 25 and 70 percent. The near-surface soils are pot free-draining. . The pur4ose of these backfill requirements is to ensure that the design criteria for a retaining,wall are not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. "[tie top 12 to 18 inches of the backfill should consist of a compacted. relatively • impermeO ble soil or topsoil, or the surface should be paved. The ground surface must also ,--, slope away from backfilled walls to reduce the potential for surface St water to olpercolate into the bac I ill. The sub-section entitled General Earthwork s recommendations regarding the placement and compaction of structural fill behind retaining and foundation walls. The above recommendations are not intended to waterproof the i GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. LG, 'A 0990T6b+c7b SL79I TH']?IC ..I. N IHH SUWOHI WA Re: 7R c -77-AON • Laade Feed C mpany JN 99132 . May 20, 1999 •. • Page 6 . 1 r, below-gr de walls. If some seepage through the walls or moist conditions are not acceptab e, waterproofing should be provided. This typically includes limiting cold-joints and wall pen trations, and using bentonite panels or membranes on the outside of the walls. Applying thin coat of asphalt emulsion is not considered waterproofing, but it will only help to preven moisture, generated from water vapor or capillary action, from seeping through the concr te. Excavations and Slo es Excavation s opes. should not exceed the limits specified in local, state, and national government safety regulations. Temporary cuts to a depth of about 4 feet may be attempted vertically in unsaturated soil, if there are no indications of slope instability. Based upon Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 296, Part N, the soil type above the groundwater table would be classified as i Type C. Therefore, temporary cut slopes cannot be excavated at an inclination steeper than.1.5:1 (Horizontal:Vertical), extending continuously between the top and the bottom of a cut. Temporary excavations that encounter caving soils or seepage will need to be shored and may require ewatering. The above-r commended temporary slope inclination is based on what has been successful at other sites w th similar soil conditions. Temporary cuts are those that will remain unsupported for a relatively sh rt duration to allow for the construction of foundations, retaining walls, or utilities. Temporary c t slopes should be protected with plastic sheeting during wet weather. The cut slopes should also e backfilled or retained as soon as possible to reduce the potential for instability. Please note 1 hat loose soil can cave suddenly and without warning. Utility contractors should be made especially aware of this potential danger. I. Drainage C nsiderations Vye recomrnrnd the use of footing drains at the base of footings, where (1) crawl spaces or basements ill be below a structure, (2) a slab is below the outside grade, or(3) the outside grade does not slope downward from a building. Drains should also be placed at the base of all Ilackfilled, a rth-retaining walls. These drains should be surrounded by at least 6 inches of 1-inch- minus, was ed rock and then wrapped in non-woven, geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or similar material). At its highest point, a perforated pipe invert should be at least as low as the bottom 'f the footing, and it should be sloped for drainage. Drainage should also be provided inside the ff otprint of a structure, where (1) a crawl space will slope or be lower than the surrounding round surface, (2) an excavation encounters significant seepage, or (3) an excavation for a buildi g will be close to the expected high groundwater elevations. We can provide recommend lions for interior drains, should they become necessary, during excavation and foundation c nstruction. All roof and'surface water drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system. A typical drain detail is attached to this report as Plate 7. For the best long-term performance, perforated PI IC pipe Is recommended for all subsurface drains. I GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. P -.J RcgRTRb+C74, Q 1 _'lam I TS-V NH ..1 �N?IHI-1 SHWf]H 1 W.-1 Ac: 7R RR-77-Af7N i r - I ..IN 99»1 Lane Feed Company Page 2 May 20. 1999 • 7 Groundwater as observed during our field work. If seepage is encountered in an excavation, it should be dra ned from the site by directing it through drainage ditches, perforated pipe, or French drains, or by umping it from sumps interconnected by shallow connector trenches at the bottom of the excavalio . The excavati n and site should be graded so that surface water is directed off the site and away from the top of slopes. Water should notbe allowed to Final site gradingtand in any area in areas adjacent vhere foundations, to buildings should slabs, or pay ments are to be constucted slope away a•least 2 percent, except where the area is paved. Pavement Areas Ali pavement sections should be supported over at least 8 inches of imported, gravelly structural fill.wet, or unstable areas. We Additional structural fill or fabric may be needed to stabilize soft, recommend sing Supac SNP, manufactured by Phillips Petroleum Company, or a non-woven fabric with e4ivalent strength and permeability characteristics_ In most instances where unstable subgrade co ditions are encountered, 12 inches of granular structural fill will stabilize the subgrade, except for vry soft areas where additional fill could be required. The subgrade should be evaluated b Geotech Consultants, Inc., after the site is stripped and cut to grade. Recommendations for the compaction of structural fill beneath pavements are given in a later sub- section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill. The performance of site pavements is t- directly related to the strength and stability of the underlying subgrade. The pavement section for lightly-loaded traffic and parking areas should consist of 2 inches of asphalt conc-ete (AC) over 4 inches of crushed rock base (CR8) or 3 inches of asphalt-treated base (ATB). We recommend providing heavily-loaded areas with 3 inches of AC over 6 inches of CR8 or 4 in hes of ATB. Heavily-loaded areas are typically main driveways, dumpster sites, or areas with t uck traffic. The City of Renton may have additional requirements for pavement irnprovemen s in city right-of-ways. The paveme t section recommendations and guidelines presented in this report are based on our experience i the area and on what has been successful in similar situations. Some maintenance apd repair o limited areas can be expected. To provide for a design without the need for any repair would, e uneconomical. General Earthwork and Structural Fill All building 4nd pavement areas should be stripped of surface vegetation, topsoil, organic soil, and other deleterious material. The stripped or moved materials should not be mixed with in non-structural areas, suchaas materials to'be used as structural fill, but they could be landscape bOds. Structural fill)is defined as any fill placed under a building, behind permanent retaining fi or osundatildon !` walls, or in 'zither areas where the underlying soil needs to support loads. All structuralll placed in hgrizontal lifts with a moisture content at, or near, the optimum moisture content. The optimum moisture content is that moisture content that results in the greatest compacted dry GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. - acoa r cib+c7b s I ^]31 T H0dti A3>I?lt'H St5WOH1 Wd eb: Z0 00-ZZ-AON JN 99132 r r - • Linde Feed Company JN 99132 May 20, 1999 Page 8 density. The (moisture content of fill is very important and must be closely controlled during the filling and compaction process. The allowable.thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material type selected, the compaction equipment us d, and the number of passes made to compact the lift. The loose lift thickness should not ex eed 12 inches. We recommend testing the fill as it is placed. If the All is not compacted to specifications, it can be recompacted before another lift is placed. This eliminates the need to rmove the fill to achieve the required compaction. The following table presents recommended,relative compactions for structural fill: . • Minimum . , i 1 Location of Fill Placement Relative Compaction II Beneath footings,slabs, 95%or walkways j Behind retaining walls 90% ' Beneath pavements 95%for upper 12 Inches - - of subgrade,90%below that level Where; Minimum Relative Compaction is the ratio, expressed in percentages,of the compacted dry density to the maximum dry density, as determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D 1557-78(Modified Proctor), LIMITATIONS The analyses conclusions, and recommendations contained in this report are based on site ' conditions as they existed at the time of our exploration and assume that the soil encountered in the test borin s is representative of subsurface conditions on the site. If the subsurface conditions encountered uring construction are significantly different from those observed in our explorations, we should b advised at once so that we can review these conditions and reconsider our recommendat ons where necessary. Unanticipated soil conditions are commonly encountered on copstruction ites and cannot be fully anticipated by merely taking soil samples In test borings. Subsurface c nditions can also vary between exploration locations. Such unexpected conditions frequently re uire making additional expenditures to attain a properly constructed project. It is potential extr costs and risks. This is a standard recommendation for all projects.recommende that the owner consider providing a contingency fund to accommodate such This report as been prepared for the exclusive use of Lande Feed Company. and its representativ s, for specific application to this project and site. Our recommendations and conclusions a e based on observed site materials, and selective laboratory testing and engineering . analyses. 0 r conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in accordance with current tandards of practice within the scope of our services and within budget and time constraints. o warranty is expressed or implied: The scope of our services does not include services relat d to construction safety precautions, and our recommendations are not intended to direct the co tractor's methods. techniques, sequences, or procedures, except as specifically described in ur report for consideration in design. We recommend including this report, in its entirety, in th project contract documents so the contractor may be aware of our findings. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. .+. - , Pc'Qnicb+C7b S1031I HONO A3NNdH SOWOH1 Wd o ,: Ze 00-ZZ-/SON r r i - % I • ' • 41r(.\ �_ � F TON •- r=r _�a ' _ f� '''\.� i I A R URT _ is • . , ..,... ..._ :•:-:': \ . : I:::.;:::.;:::::::.!:I %g i d '` • 1 :•:•:.:. il ei , 1 . ./... I • i i , -L-.=r_ 7 . ) • ;i '` 1•• a athleti ' ' �(I . ' Meld :I ;+1t ,4 ,S I•t. _ . 1. 0 • ai . 1\1 I 1' l . I_ , 23 • (I' I1P .1. Witter •%• I �I __� ! •`: f • % • r — ti I .1 1 /his N .......• fr ..;1 i , ./1 • .•;1, • r. !..i. ;i__.....• El 1 \ . . • : fr / ! ,ij f/ i . ‘ in 1• .040th\:: --.....-- — . 1.: •..*...:-:-:-'-.)..-1_). 4'I ./. i\i‘:.; 5"1-•-°7.y...._(H_n_ EN 11 �►' '(—SUg ECr• 'N� . / ' ; 1 off- :• ? , ; ' >s(�t�a►l- l . o -t �� Perk • • • --.____• ..,, l• 18 itg a__1;"/ T 1.,,, 41., rt... ...:..::.. .itl 0\ . • • yy�� L (1,ii-,) `� •/i, • ▪ • . r 144JJ � •... \\\,, .: • l , s‹... • • it ' •1 MI 1h � / •:• • , \f�. i ( . •\„, 1 , , .3, _•,.. . :.:•••- . Rt) / .....`:-\ "N-7_7-,\ . , gi. . col ,• • _-III A. LEGEND: 1 CONTOUR INTERVAL:2SFEET SCALE:1''I,000' ��h-ZL . r-J (SOURCE:USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OF THE RENTON QUADRANGLE,WA. 1949.PHOrOREVISEO 1900 t 1973) ' VICINITY MAP 1 G E O T E C H 95 Burnett Avenue South } I CONSULTANTS, INC. Renton, Washington 1 may. Job No: Dale: •• I " Plate:"— . .. I 99132 May 1999 ( 1 I \...•_j ''1+ ;�._;,,,�'�0.s• Western Pneumatic I..l ...., rk f= �,fr � �4! 77 Burnett Avenue South ;ifs-Li >en•1...1 ly 1:>f-t FF t J' •1••wf-` •.;•..i • ;,•y F�r,�. 4',z=p__, 'tee`/ • -w .r. A m :;-i CC i?�c�rfC o >- % -c w :Am.,..Ira..;,1• to .. 7 N 7:•r 4:••,1 y • 'Fdi ,B3 t'1 c 92� o I r.{.r Ao 35"-4';7P' c r."•- ' ),St.1,171.1 izVyl:e I 43 • > to !ram''• -., .} 0'�1%'; in • "•4 ►. C fp e;r' 1 ye_2 r':1, .t cla %�w7c.'i Masonry Building 'i47(FV (garage) 4,711 (lr 101 Burnett Ave.S. •• •w r.+5v-I41 Garage v i • ;s?µ f • Burnett Place S. House •• �i4 03 Burnett Ave.S J f�j LEGEND: I I C 1 Approximat `Location of Boring Made by B Geolech Corjsultants,Inc.April 1999 FM: Trees,grass,or brambles - III Q Concrete or Asphalt Approximate property line i • SOTTO SCALE • . A i 1 ____.. 1 SITE EXPLORATION PLAN i �O T�C H 95 Burnett Avenue South CONSULTANTS, INC. Renton, Washington I 1 `---1 !Job No: [date: plate: 2 99172 May 1999 [ i f I . _.-..... . .....u.. f'.Lil l'...., 1 I-,J a • n f1f�-77_1 fI,J o 1.._ - BORING 1 0 Joey �V)0. 0 � F Jy Description r—, FILL Asphalt over brown SAND with tine gravel, moist, loose (FILL) — I -- 2 1 `r i/111 Brown to gray, sandy SILT, moist, soft - 1 ML - 4 ; 2 {. -becomes more sandy UU 13 3 U sp I Brown SAND, slightly oxidized, with trace of silt, fine-to medium-grained, I ! I • moist, medium dense 23 1 4 Ll I Brown,gravelly, SAND, fine-to coarse-grained,wet, medium dense _ SW 20 i S -becomes more gravelly - - i I I 1 ) -, I [III 11 i• 6 0 Mt. Grayish-brown SILT with fine sand,wet, stiff t-.• I I� 5 ' - Brown, silty GRAVEL with sand, fine-to coarse-grained,wet, 21 7 � :IGMI. medium-dense - 41 • 8 iJ . -becomes dense _ 0 1 • i -- * Test boring was terminated at 29 feet during drilling on April 23, 1999. - I * Groundwater seepage was encountered during drilling at 10feet 5 l0 — BORING LOG AteG E O T E C H 95 Burnett Avenue South CONSULTANTS, INC. Renton, Washington il 1— ► f Job Na: Date: ILoggedb' : Plate: 9917I May 1999 TA i BUKIN(i Z <, •111 ,1a• .0\�itf•C �Gca $aJ' � Description oc 2"asphalt over 6"concrete over brown, silty SAND with FILL some gravel, damp, loose (FILL) ll Brown SILT with sand and gravel, moist, soft .. ML ' — 4 1 O l .Ill -' • • Brown, sandy GRAVEL to gravelly SAND, moist, dense — .IGI. • 0 23 2 U. .• •• • . No sample I ` • .• • • • '• " ' ' Brown, sandy GRAVEL with trace of sift, fine-to coarse-grained, moist, 5 I 5t 3 O.IG"1• very dense • _ I '0 * Test boring was terminated at 16.5 feel during drilling on April 23, 1999. * No groundwater seepage was encountered during drilling. ?5 — 6 r 30 — i I 35 .-- I 1 40— BORING LOG G E Q T E C H 95 Burnett Avenue South ` CONSULTANTS, INC. Renton, Washington Job No: Date: l uggerT bw: I Plate: 1 1 _. . ,,... _ l 99131 Ma,:1999 I l J ,, r- BORING 3 �e ,;.4t` ,yc°,0\5,e ,e, ``i4 �0 Description 0� �a 5 J Brown organic topsoil over — .4 1 [ [Li] Brown, silty SAND, fine-grained, trace of organics, moist, loose i , M4 Brownish gray with orange mottling, SILT with sand, very moist, soft 2 z I'I Gray, silty SAND, fine-grained,wet,very loose SM 5 3 .g� SP C -becomes less silly 0 — IO q i f 1m IL Gray, sandy SILT with organic layers, occasional gravel,wet, stiff • 5 F - rained wet loose B 5 �. SP Brown SAND with trace of silt, fine- to medium- rained, P - becomes gray - O •5 6 J I Gray, sandy SILT with thin organic layers, wet, loose — ML • - becomes hard 'S "- 50/6" 7 0: Gray, sandy GRAVEL with trace of silt,wet, very dense * Test boring was terminated at 26feet during drilling on April 23, I999. 10 '-- * Groundwater seepage was encountered at 6feet during drillitve . 15 '— r • L. 10 r ' • BORING LOG ,.. i GE O T E C H 95 Burnett Avenue South CONSULTANTS, INC. Renton, Washington Job No: [ ute: 111)gg. d : f Plate_ SII99112May999T 1 . I d�� cVr IIVL 't ao`e 0`o` ,‘ �Q\y PG5 Description • Brown, fine sand (Top Soll) over FILL brown to orange, silty SAND with gravel, moist, loose (FILL) • liii' ff ML Brown SILT to silty SAND, with some gravel, moist, loose 31 ` -becomes gravelly .. Lh 31 2 El SP Brown, gravelly SAND, medium- to coarse-grained, moist, dense III. * Test boring was terminated at 12 feet during drilling on April 23, 1999. — * No groundwater seepage was encountered during drilling. .. - - I - w 1 M • 6.. r I - I BORING LOG ' G E O T E C H 95 Burnett Avenue South CONSULTANTS, INC. Renton, Washington ihb 9 ii [Mafiff%99 1Loggedbj: [Plate: 6 I i Slops bxkfi/l away front foundation. TIGHTL/NE ROOF DRAIN GDo not conned ID footMp drain. I = BACK/ILL See text for VAPOR BARRIER rogvintmevila. r____1_ WASHED CK •.•. . ... • `;• ,. r. n 'Cei 4 milt �� I••�� � D Riv 6 •::.4% FREE-DRAINING SAND/GRAVEL NONWOVEN: GEOTEXTILE FILTER FA: '/C 4~PERFORArED HARD PVC PIPE Invert al least as low as fooling and/or crawl mace. SlOpe ,o drain. Place weep/WSJ downward. 1 • 4 GEOFOOTING DRAIN DETAIL �'E C H 95 Burnett Avenue South CONSULTANTS, INC. Renton, Washington Job No: Date: - plate: T i99132 May 1999 Al r .. _ .,.._..... Inimit hfraan Moot Yr • . . ._Geotechoical Engineering Report , , Subsurface problems are a principal cause of construction delays,cost overruns, claims,and disputes. The following information is provided to help you manage your risks, Geotechnical Se"vices Are Performed for • elevation,configuration, location, orientation, or Specific Purpos'.s, Persons, and Protects weight of the proposed structure. • composition of the design team, or Geotechnical engineers structure their services to meet the spe- • project ownership. cific needs of their cli?nts.A geotechnical engineering study con- ducted for a civil engineer may not fulfill the needs of a construc- As a general rule, always inform your geotechnical engineer lion contractor or ever?another civil engineer.Because each geot- of project changes--even minor ones—and request an ethnical engineering study is unique, each geotechnical engi- assessment of their impact. Geotechnical engineers cannot -leering report is unique, prepared solely for the client. No one accept responsibility or liability for problems that occur 1 except you should re y on your geotechnical engineering report because their reports do not consider developments of which without first conferring with the geotechnical engineer who pre they were not informed. pared it. And no one+not even you—should apply the report for any purpose or projec except the one originally contemplated. Subsurface Conditions Can Change A Geotechnical gineering Report Is Based an A geotechnical engineering report is based on conditions that existed at the time the study was performed. Do not rely on a A Unique Set of roject-Specific Factors geotechnical engineering report whose adequacy may have Geotechnical enginee consider a number of unique,project-spe- been affected by: the passage of time; by man-made events, cific factors when esta fishing the scope of a study.Typical factors such as construction on or adjacent to the site; or by natural Include:the client's g als,objectives,and risk management pref- events, such as floods, earthquakes, or groundwater fluctua• erencest the general n ture of the structure involved,its size,and tions. Always contact the geotechnical engineer before apply- configuration; the loca ion of the structure on the site; and other Ing the report to determine if it is still reliable.A minor amount planned or existing s e improvements, such as access roads. of additional testing or analysis could prevent major problems. parking lots, and and rground utilities. Unless the geotechnical engineer who conduc ed the study specifically indicates other- Most Geotechnft;al Findings Are wise, do not rely on a eotechnical engineering report that was: processional Opinions • not prepared for yo . • not prepared for yo r project, Site exploration identifies subsurface conditions only at those • not prepared for th specific site explored,or points where subsurface tests are conducted or samples are • completed before i portant project changes were made. taken. Geotechnical engineers review field and laboratory data and then apply their professional judgment to render an opinion Typical changes tha can erode the reliability of an existing about subsurface conditions throughout the site. Actual sub- surface geotechnical engine ring report include those that affect: surface Conditions may differ—sometimes significantly—from • the function of the roposed structure, as when those indicated in your report. Retaining the geotechnical engi- it's changed from a parking garage to an office neer who developed your report to provide construction obser- building,or from a ght industrial plant to a vatlon is the most effective method of managing the risks asso- refrigerated wareho se, dated with unanticipated conditions. SECTION VII • AKB Engineers,Inc. T:\9200132\9200I32tir.doc\Page 25 . r VII. BASIN AND COMMUNITY PLAN AREAS (ATTACHED) The Project is situated within the Green River Community Planning Area and Cedar River Basin (see Figure 1 and 2, attached). AKB Engineers,Inc. T:\9200I32\9200132tir.doc\Page 26 g• . a w • ' . a i s (. • Z is • in 2 •lgo i+ HI. • • _ ) = Z c g- • 1\ ' %. t' �'''� •••* if -�7 ►��• Q, Y " i �I, 1 i111 I ! • �J �,Q 0 N i ! 1 lI ''IiA �1 Z . , i, . 11t0-------- „ ..... Z I , . ,/ (. ...), ... ---/-7-21,--r:1:4-1\!! r C-., .„_,.,1 r \ , :LI ii,r,•1 IN' i = �„r" t l� , �-o), ` f A i ‘,..:_••• VI N ... r kJ : ; \ \7- ,•. : 1 ,11 1 .. \,_,,,,....... .•••••• ,•,::,, III i �,_ / 1),,, 1�1!1 ' �. `�17 /, 1 ; �� .1. . I �l ( ' ' I i. 11 ( !?I 1� 1 ( II II L / • 1 ( �' ! !, ,l 11 II II, Al dl I ' !ly' �(+ 11 ' !! I Il ,I� q z I , • ___,, 4,1 iv c(f iiw 2,,13-..,‘ 0 i . I, c 1 II'N.... I r.--- 4' ., . . ! • .1 , ., . t, .„) , ,. .. ii . _, , . , ...1) i ) I ; ' I ,t r ) 1 ! I /• . ,�; ,� I, ` i 1, CryI } il III to; ;+ I I; f1 I 3 I I ).f • 'I ' 1 g 1 I ' o o i!',,., I �` i i \ it 0. ‘ x; W `l . I ,, A 1 It • t , I, + ! ! .� 1 2 V 3 ' �:. v//- 1ti O. ( i dI 1�1 O J 1, •�� , 4 I ' I '‘. I '.5 ,_......."' ...% . 1: i� 1 :i 1 !l •i ....... /1606, 9 P ,lipli-litasiir I, ' : . . I 7-'Nall;;421 I . litli..... ; :1 *\\\,/ I ...'' Air -11 t 1 . 11 / li , ,ill BO- 'liA • ,. ! - ki.--yewmg - , ,v, ' ' x 1< Ort l' , ,..... t; 1 II Ragitili, ry I „ ,--1, ' 11 11) ii.jelen \ . . li 1 gir 0 $ 1 hett!: : r �7 - 1�I1 �� ' • . r .ffall i cc O il W W '.1 JI '. oc - 4 Ac t r ' - i inamibg......"-,404iiiiicie •... IA ---) 1;3 ,,,,. . . t ,.,4 1., .....• i , ,. ,..,... • _ ' joie a err[• �iNpliiiv.A1 lOix 101 __ /,, _it MINNN11 allrlp'� �f - `� ,� , 44 . it OP ..1. • 1�'-,.,.at .. t glom F - • In IlL-i:: I l�Yeyo'�` ga.+r. �t, 'i,►�� 441kr ��1\k'1• M; t••I 2 • •..r r I� , 0 p,:.le A.,.... ..-ilvir.iii • svp..f.• ,.. .. , - . • - -.___ P 1*1 ..- AI 4;7 If7,..011; --qiii4tkigi7;. 1 _40031.-4r ne Vigdralthl 011111 .4. ‘,° st..k_lit - Iii ....- 01164111111 ----- • 41141111111114111 IL )• -i iVairte,_'r' :r�r�• � :�u�i 1C:� r4�p`• OmT: a 111111rilra ® I 11 j�I4 IF (1.:a� "tatl��,i ..weL . ��• ::I ;.. `�' iIrl I rf 4 s! Nit •"'".".1( . t:!.linillirtia-!, Si . fin 1. . It 1 'oo�, I i ` _ 1 cf---'''.\\ .1 • ,,rest, s Mir 161 n - .. i LI 1.'7.-"'N, /71.-71..-7,.i I a-i J I \. , ••••: .; . A.S. _ _.. ...- .. . ,. ...4..‘ v......1,..;_; q k ,...z._ : , ...... •, ) _.—.—.—.— . .. • • •-•-• : 4',Ntik...C. j, tip. I k • .,I Bea - • - .- - -1----A.„5:;) /- ,1".• - „. ‹.. • s K \-.1..)----..!.f -. ., • . .,r,- i , ..r• 1 ..._ 1.. __. . --, . -......„ ..... ?,, •.•:.- . •\,.. " ./ • 1 .5.:,•••, / ''T . •*. /-•'•- t..... kr. \..." -I_ ' - .. c: .I , ,.. So .4. ,.,;-.,7(..--e. • ...-- .• - , 4'••C':,::::_. Crue,,T Cne• \ \. ../ %. • ._. • . . '.-1 %Ilk 1 .1- .• : .' / ......,„ :. 1 . . ..01ii ri. ‘:\ . 7' ; • taa --&....,........- . e-'. i .... .7:-..•-• "Z.: •• • .._... -..:. • 7r. \ c ..''..S ISH , • , ...• i 116 •-i •in. ...., -... 1 1 • 1111 .0.4,- -..1.. ..-• • \ I .-. 5-7.1 ihtiniol, r . ,.... - .• - •••••• 5 •• .-. . . ./ " trrtifritk _ itia.iii, ire. .-.- .- _ • .,..,..,.....% •-..‘ _C-•...1, ..f:.r." ..---•-•"---- ' •:'''•-•••".----: .:: . _;.‘,4" -5•1•••••• ,•-‘.:i, ! -. .,• -.•. A • . •* . dielr: -• •4,-. fr. \ ffr- 1.. ... "A . 1 1dPilliti‘lf dal- / - rIplib.11 ....... • • ....., .• s 4. •. •.''.,. ‘.• . a•• :.. - ...... , ......... :-......- „, s... ...-RIVE‘ 11--- -------; • .„-: •_., •-- ./----------c-:- , _ . ..__,..-.--.. - • i. .-:-._ ...:. stik„,,-, A„4-.-z,v.,-If ,.: c` -t. .-n; --."' .... ..-- •-:-. • J.-----.7 \. . Ir. .• Ile:. 1416 ....... e...... ze..... r...., ''. "ill 1 ' • fir,_ . ••...... , .. ,s,_ .... = . ........• ,,Ai.o.f... .T.,,, s.k....._..... ..... .,..._ -: ‘• .. "... -- . . •,. . 'I'''. ! 1 A 1 \_ • • - .. : • - :V -,._•--."',....L7 7 • A : -.. Vitt P-1.= ,-A ... -T--- v ''''•-• ; . . .... ---. _ • ._. I -.' -=7-.1•„ilk(.61 sigLa i n44., ittiorAs_.......,,,, ,_ Tokut Omit .. i'17• -_.:••.-:-.•.,I.:• -- e.„....„ ...'...,,,,;-.,..l:..lie141r i-..0P,:.1 P.7.i13:li '.F_ •.--i--.k ti-t.)e,'.V....4w1i1 '‘•,-•C, . • 6;4-n-C.C;-•••.•/ ;(,.• '•nil 9 ' e!:. •-'-r-•--S.n•oQL.0,^4 Mzy_s-•t' qk•t-•--.-.-_..•.,e-- - -:-:••: )-.._B_;Ae: S:.t':..:-I;N---:.-:.:'.;-•;. • - . z „ 1 4 - - . . 4 _ : E i _ .t.• T,:.-•.i • g ' ' '''' • RIVER , . ;,,..--1.... ., .-•-•• .:,,,.„- • - ..1,..4 i..„ ,, - ..•*v.-_.. ,.. ... .,.....-.,....i...:. ,. . _.,.. .- , „If;. iklii : ,i. 4...- ANA 4)P.I ` I V .• I tug ._,..,— , , .. . lie- '<Vibe .• ----• .;:•• .........-•.•-• . ' , . • : '' ,..1114 It" : Islaml‘' • V..1-4'.. . V -._ - • :..-.• , ...7 . , - . %, , . . . . :- • pu6Er Iht? - IALV.11.,---- ' i 1--7 , \ . .•sk.. !, .-- 4 4 /me Ova 1 ..._.. -:. .... : . II% Nit It' \r, IIA1- 1' ; •?... I .- - . - . . ... ... ...-- . TT . ...7 ..-• •a::".. -..'-. / .7:-.-;.IP 1 I k \ 1 I \ 1 If' 11.. .:.‘" • • r liir 45..I, .......---.- . - % _4 .41-iii-V-' ••'- --:-'•--E3ASIN - -,•• ..,,... .,.:._.:.. ?.... :•••.---7-....• ....,•.:.,.:1".. .,.......- . • .. 4.- f . ; --• ! 7..-.. --- "fi: •• St% 1 . .— .:.-.. .......s :-7.... t •,...... ..,,, ' Ng 401g...Fair ! ..: t..... .-=..:„:-- _.... • ---";----- ---" .a 'wait.Colt ."-:.- :..,- .• . "".:y.••.: I • Li ::: INA 7._.• *„.,,,..,01.„, . . • . ..... _‘,,, .,...s, -):-.7-•::-.‘ .--7- . ....*. • ...- ,.......-:.- • ....... .1 . . ?;•^` - It> it '-' cr. a,M : ."-...-.' t . % ._ ' ,,•15.......•Cm* ..... '''• 7 •r.nz.= Virw; 39,0011•Iii• ? • -. • ____ . . . • , -. : .....- .•. : , • /- ° -i SINN 0 • , .— \ 1: _........:_ , ........... -.. 59 . -.-. . .:. ... •, 3 •-.'"Z. 3 .../ t..-- .. •; - .— ,t h="\ . - "Ill I illir F. la , , k . • ....__ .,...,:...,_ __ •. .= . __ . _ .._....... • .._ ,...„.. ... . . ...„.•., • _.,..„ . .,.....:„._..., :i ..,.. • ,. , ..... „. .--__ • . ..., . ___,.. t--- - • / ........„ _ .. -= I, 1-- ffeW • . . 1 • , ' t , r..... ...--- •-•.:_•--,:7" --I.-.. - •. - ...,_. .. sewn Fat . , • '•y-- ''::. -...1jkOr".---. . , T..", . t 1-•.1 Figure 2 , .__,-i- Do 11••••s trot fig! ! A. :„..] r,.4 - '':-- " --.‘. .11lilr' • ••••..:4 '..' . ,, :ic..1 '-'2.St•-.. • ••• . te:•..r•Aker • • ....._._,..„.. I . '... 1.••••4/1.- - / ,, ,_.j .4 ... .-.!Pia • IP .,.:*i. "111 -,=.. if . ili 'Is, - --7--.--: - ...c......\:1.- Marl . --..) - IN tkow -• It...-----, '-- s-E-------.-- i .... -....i.. . .'"-' •----.. A 1 ', c .- . . . -.! -'--I 1 DRAINAGE BASINS , • •... i • ,,Frr.:•••., A..‘.s.evecrbAt •• ro•is• • • • I /. I :O., ddi .%. - - lc; e ..• ' .-.-- " .4Plin.' ...., . King County . ...- -\. ... ._. 11 .; .= ..---• .. • .........•.. -- \ i DRAINAGES ,Air- !Ili l'r., 1 ; .3! \.. .?----;,---.--- .r_.• - .,-; - -----. " : p li :t ' 1 • _., _...."._ \ . (......1._ ... ._, ,.......J . iii_. a. _. ._ , \.. ,....—.." c.-: 0 _ ,.... i,. I, Oil Of SE•7111-•RaT 1 ."." •.. \ TA P L t . ......... Z.\ .!...f. : . - . 1985 ..-k, 1 j ,,„-,_rOr.,. ( 77' -, ‘, sib--: .41 t i .. UP • / k •••': ..• -•.- -- , 4; \..--air:7.-144AP '-'-.- .-- u : ,t --. - I - f-i. I 1 r ---. • -r.::."---. i --t ..•. -- -. c- • :Pimp.m.. ....,_ k .-ZI . NNW." Major Basin Boundary 1 - --• ., . s - ,•-•,\---,._.(-1 .,....., A . . . ‘-r-.4. , ( • . . .. .." 't Sub-Basin Boundary ...— \_4,,......\--•\,* '12,\. .. 41: 1:97!Id.1 IFIIIII:: ''-'1 \''.7:-.-- ' ..\ vdr4.- . ' -)111.1 . 1it..:/ \''' •ic ..7_ iii . . \ ;-• - :7. , ..\ - -..g:- . -.---. , . ... , 7-1‘.......---_,..-At......, 't j•-----......-es ; •-. ..,,,, . I \(i.,‘1..4\,. \ '41;4--• --- - ----- - ., ..,.• 4 •'..,, .. _,,, Cak CADA .1:t .\ 1‘. Gem ( /- '. • ) 1 . .-.• 4-- 1 ; 1 1 . .; •a .•- --- A.4:1:., , lir ,..._ _ 4 — : .7- If- Source: Kirig County Sensitive Areas . , • .- 4 .••••• 1 :: -\4. -.-)*' Si:•... e• . 1,.. _.! Map Folio,Wetlends.Supplement 1 ...••:; ..• i I 1-. . :...-— 1 ••••':'-':._-:.:...--- • :.-- i -........ , -- _ ..,---\.,... .. 1.Z.--- t .....' m;•• • 1 • •• . • g -..:,..i i r '10 be ..... ..1-.'''.-.-'--N•S4. . . .. OTT Or TILCOaa.TIATTROOD -...'"...-\...., A r••„,,,--43:::-.::...,-•' A. s • 7 :.. e 'IS t 9 ii • &MUM -- "N -1 . \ . . - r or,: — .... 7.-- ...) . A f \ e . . ....... • / i t A ...., .._ ',. ........,. A• "" h•f•.a.., BASE . 1, = :1 ..._ • ....N.) za.......„...-_.....,41......„ s.... p 1 „...,.. ,.......:i ---. ( . .... IlaCklif .... • .0.° ..," • \--.....e-w-..4:. '4,....."'N •...--) ' ' \ 1 - / r.r- • -.. ..... . .. \ — . - ' • `. \ , ! 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Mlles - ' :1 -•%,4.. _ -. ___ . 't •-•,,,,,..-we'--,---.,r .- ; 1:300,000 • 1/90 .. • . . . . .- • . . . „______ . . • . . e • SECTION VIII AKB Engineers,Inc. T:\9200132\9200132tir.doclPaee 27 VIII. OTHER PERMITS. NOT APPLICABLE AKB Engineers,Inc. T:19200I3219200I32tir.doc\Paee23 � I SECTION IX AKB Engineers.Inc. T:\9200132\9200I32tir.doc\Page 29 • IX.EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DESIGN The Erosion and Sedimentation control (ESC) design for the Project follows the approved County practices set forth in the SWDM, as outlined in the ESC notes on the,Plans • • • • • • AKB Engineers.Inc. T:\9200132\9200132tir.doc Pace 30 SECTION X • • AKB Eneineers,Inc. T:19200132\9200132tir.doc\Page 31 • • X. BOND QUANTITY WORKSHEET, DETENTION FACILITY SUMMARY SHEET AND DECLARATION OF COVENANT Bond Quantities Worksheet(Attached) Detention Summary Sheet(N/A) Declaration of Covenant(Attached) • • AKB Engineers.Inc. T:\9200132\9200132tir.doc\Page 32 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet King County Department of Development & Environmental Services , 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton,Washington 98055-1219 • Project Name: Date: Location: SIERRA Project No.: • SIERRA Activity No.: Note: All prices include labor, equipment, materials, overhead and Clearing greater than or equal to 5000 board feet of timber? profit. Prices are from RS Means data adjusted for the Seattle area or from local sources if not included in the RS Means database. yes no If yes, Forest Practice Permit Number: (RCW 76.09) Page 1 of 9 • • Unit prices updated 12/97 S:PUBLIC\LUSD\LUIS\REF8D SITE BOND QUANTITY WORKSHEET Revision date: 8/22/98 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet :::...:....::.. R(7. ' . ....::.. E .. .. ....::::.:. Backfill&compaction-embankment J $ 4.89 CY Check dams,4" minus rock SWDM 5.4.0.3 $ 58.70 Each Crushed surfacing 1 1/4' minus WSDOT 9-03.9(3) $ 74.30 CY • Ditching $ 7.03 CY Excavation-bulk $ 1.30 CY • Fence, silt SWDM 5.4.3.1 $ 1.20 LF Fence, Temporary(NGPE) $ 1.20 LF Hydroseeding SWDM 5.4.2.4 $ 0.51 SY Jute Mesh SWDM 5.4.2.2 $ 1.26 SY Mulch, by hand, straw, 3" deep SWDM 5.4.2.1 $ 1.75 SY Mulch,by machine, straw, 2" deep SWDM 5.4.2.1 $ 0.46 SY Piping, temporary, CPP, 6" $ 9.30 LF Piping, temporary, CPP, 8" $ 14.00 LF Piping, temporary, CPP, 12" $ 18.00 LF ,Plastic covering, 6mm thick, sandbagged SWDM 5.4.2.3 $ 2.00 SY Rip Rap, machine placed; slopes WSDOT 9-13.1(2) $ 33.98 CY • Rock Construction Entrance, 50'x15'x1' SWDM 5.4.4.1 $ 1;273.34 Each Rock Construction Entrance, 100'x15'x1' SWDM 5.4.4.1 $• 2,546.68 Each Sediment pond riser assembly SWDM 5.4.5.2 $ 1,695.11 Each Sediment trap, 5' high berm SWDM 5.4.5.1 $ 15.57 LF Sed.trap,5'high,riprapped spillway berm section SWDM 5.4.5.1 $ • 59.60 LF Seeding, by hand SWDM 5.4.2.4 $ 0.44 SY Sodding, 1"deep, level ground SWDM 5.4.2.5 $ 5.24 SY Sodding, 1"deep, sloped ground SWDM 5.4.2.5 $ 6.48 SY TESC Supervisor $ 65.00 HR Water truck, dust control SWDM 5.4.7 $ 85.00 HR • 1 Gi ^Y .........::..... .v::.�::::v.:�::::::::..:::::::::..:..:::..�.:�is}:?�:.}:i::'::{.•..::'ii: �' .....-Each ..� '• ............ .................. ......... ............. .-... ... .. . ESC SUBTOTAL: • $ COLUMN: A Page 2 of 9 Unit prices updated 12/97 S:PUBLIC\LUSD\LUIS\REFBD SITE BOND QUANTITY WORKSHEET Revision date: 8/22/98 • Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet ligArgM t :;>1�:.;..............�:;:.:;:•::.:;•;:;.;?.::.::,>:;::�..�.::::F!I#................�l.....::•.:::.::. Ir'ri::::>df1�9f!`is�I1Sf�i?�?<<'. >�<':>'•s' '�>? z'>>>>> zz; <<>`: ><»� �<?<;. ........:::::. &lei" ................:...................................:::.. .......... t Pt1ce .:.:::::....::.:.:::::::.::::::.:::::.::::.�:::::::::::::,.::::v...�:.�:::.�::::.;.::.:.::• gOhltM ,::::.:,..tau ... :.::•::::>:,,.:: ..._.,,-- .:: •:-.•. :-�':. -�::--:':. uanh::.._ ::�:::-::;;'.ems#:::•>.<:: >.�:<:::> -- ITEMS........ ................................. ...........>......,.......:::::.::...................................:....... . ............................... ............................. . ........................... .......................:.�:..:.::........................... ........•...........................•..... •......•...............•. .....•..., :�: :'r:iifti:Si::'•'.$i::�:f'%> i:;:roisi:;:;;; :i :`•:o;;ii>;:;:;iiiSii:i}£;issaf:iti: i%ii#a:>fSSfii:�i:ii:p:ii}:i$i:;>iii!;2iiaisiii;:`•isi?iii{i?i ;i2';i?{;i<;i;::?{:?::iiiEs# ii>it'+:;i;:;2;ESi>r `iiii �> i Backfill&Compaction-embankment $ 4.89 CY • Backfill&Compaction-trench $ 7.42 CY Clear/Remove Brush,by hand $ 0.31 SY Clearing/Grubbing/Tree Removal $ 7,718.40 Acre Excavation•bulk $ 1.30 CY Excavation-Trench $ 3.53 CY Fencing,cedar,6'high $ 16.13 LF Fencing,chain link,vinyl coated, 6'high $ 11.69 LF Fencing,chain link,gate,vinyl coated, 20' $ 1,105.92 Each Fencing,split rail,3'high $ 10.54 LF Fill&compact-common barrow $ 19.63 CY Fill&compact-gravel base $ 22.16 CY Fill&compact-screened topsoil $ 32.91 CY Gabion, 12'deep,stone filled mesh $ 47.23 SY Gabion, 18'deep,stone filled mesh $ 65.09 SY Gabion,36'deep,stone filled mesh $ 115.20 SY Grading,fine,by hand $ 1.76 SY Grading,fine,with grader $ 0.83 SY • Monuments,3'long $ 117.50 Each Sensitive Areas Sign $ 2.50 Each Sodding, 1'deep,sloped ground $ 6.49 SY Surveying,line&grade $ 685.44 Day Surveying,lot location/lines $ 1,353.60 Acre Traffic control crew(2 flaggers) $ 74.07 HR Trail,4'chipped wood $ . 6.60 SY Trail,4'crushed cinder $ 7.24 SY Trail,4'top course $ 7.12 SY Wall,retaining,concrete $ 38.40 SF . Wall,rockery • $ 8.25 . SF • Page 3 of 9 SUBTOTAL • 'KCC 27A authorizes only one bond reduction. Unit prices updated 12/97 S:PUBLIC\LUSD\LUIS\REF8D SITE BOND QUANTITY WORKSHEET Revision date: 8/22/98 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet ....:...........:......:.........:.................:.:................... . AC .......... ............vr:v::::.�:::::.�::::::::::::::�::•}:}:f}}.::}•::n•:::::::.�::.�::r:;. r.v.�:.::::r::v::•::fi}}:•}}'.. T : ..n...,.r.}:.•f:{{:.}'.:f; •: •^.}i:?•4:{.:}}}i}i}::{::?::.... .............. .I t:.gt.yr :..:.::....:.:..?...,::.:::.:':::..:•.:..::: .:.�:::....::�&'st?1i1 �"'H�•I�CIiI�L3�'•`•. ''<i< >r% �: sri'' 'f,• i`i2 '�'£%?i^ ':`:':` is <' a: ':':'>::::.;:. "` •}:•::.:.>•::.::.:•.::}.:•.:•::..... :r..::.:::r::::..�r.•{r .rlt'iA...}.. •''�f11t:i' i�E� pt.}}: "ti :},:{.;::.:'"t^:•`''•�o:`+::i:��i::o%:' [ :::::: :',t :'• ''."';:..:.:::.,.?:..::.:.:?.::}•?:::. ......:}:.:.}:•::.}}};;;?;f;:r';:i�;<:r:::2}'t;:;:f:?:}:5;:??•'.::?•}:•:: � .::::' ..: 'n. ........r...... Qtr .t}; ;i:i::';•::`';.•r:..: Grinding,4'wide machine<1000sy $ 20.00 SY • AC Grinding,4'wide machine 1000-2000sy $ 5.00 SY AC Grinding,4'wide machine>2000sy $ 1.20 SY AC Removal/Disposal/Repair • $ 35.77 SY Barricade,type I $ 26.11 LF Barricade,type III(Permanent) $ 39.17 LF Curb&Gutter,rolled $ 11.54 LF _ • Curb&Gutter,vertical $ 8.43 LF • Curb and Gutter,demolition and disposal $ 11.81 LF Curb,extruded asphalt $ 2.12 LF Curb,extruded concrete $ 2.23 LF Sawcut,asphalt,3'depth $ 1.61 LF Sawcut,concrete,per 1'depth $ 1.47 LF • Sealant,asphalt $ 0.86 LF Shoulder,AC, (see AC road unit price) $ - SY • Shoulder,gravel,4'thick $ 6.55 SY Sidewalk,4'thick $ 26.54 SY Sidewalk,4'thick,demolition and disposal $ 24.11 SY Sidewalk,5'thick $ 30.38 SY Sidewalk,5'thick,demolition and disposal $ 30.13 SY Sign,handicap $ 74.16 Each Striping,per stall $ 5.06 Each Striping,thermoplastic,(for crosswalk) $ 2.07 SF Striping,4'rellectorized line $ 0.22 LF • Page 4 of 9 SUBTOTAL *KCC 27A authorizes only one bond reduction. Unit prices updated 12/97 S:PUBLIC\LUSD\LUIS\REFBD SITE BOND QUANTITY WORKSHEET Revision.date: 8/22/98 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet ...F{:.{:ii::::.::<.:::i:::i.:.:::::::::ii;•r:::..•:::.::::::r:::r:.�.�:i.:..m::::.::::::.::r::.:.:.:::::.}.•Y}...:.Y.:::; }:.}YY::.:::v.}}Y::::.:.Y}: }:}:. i.Y::}Y}::} :..�::::.:. ..}$}�.i:::::{{:::•'}::};:;:$}$${:Yi{9i}:4:^;{{•},::::.n:.:+:::r{.:{••::.:{.:{i:..::::::x:v:+.L:v,{•::.:::r,v; ..:•':•.:is vrcv vv� .. . .. . ..................... .•...,...•.................,.. ....r....r.+...+.,.,r.:..,ll< .............. . . . .... :.......,.......,r. .)�C1.Vate.....:....:.:�::.,..i..: o. .....n............r.n..... ........................,n......, ..............$r.n.......r.:.... ..� LL M.--''NNMM .... i.::::•.:::::w::::::.:::w:::+::w:::•::. ................ ...r........:....,...........:.. ..,..n ...,..,...,..... ....... .. {�1V M�?�.R•:rw:,,}•::::;:.,,.... : i�:::::.�::rm•::::+;r}::r. :.�::::.�::: ................ .:...................rr... .,................,.,.... ....,. .....::.taua�lcrt r. ......r...:.... ..:.........................:..... ..........,..... . r.....r.:.................: .................... .. ... ...... .....r....Y.............:... ....................•.............. .. .. ....r.... a.atrienks�. ....:... ....................................... ..... ...r.:....v........:..:......>..::r:::.}.$::}:.}:.::.r:.:.:...,..;y{>!~.�raJn ..r......::..:....>................:..............:.....r.:.rr}::::::..:... .... .........,...............,.............. ................................. : ., ............:..}............. ...,.{.......::..::.tau t }: ..........r.. . . ............... : {..{..,.:..:}:.......: ...r.•:;:{::::..::;'•.. .................... ........:....................... Q r.....................�................. .. �B.Kt��1a... .... :. .. ............... .Fir::r.........:..r.::::::::.::,..�:.:::::::.�:r... ........ .:..,:+..�:L..:�:.:.::::::::..:.:::.::..r...:.......:.:....:,.:.... 1.. .......(..................................r. :.:...........�.............r.�.+................::.��...�1s .�.b:�s�.& .. ..r....... ......,.. .................................. ...........::.+........rr..:...:...r.....r..........:.:...: :.::..:.:..r..r..:... .... ..... ...,,, .--- .::}::::�:.}}}:..�:.,::.�:.}:'a.,:.�i:;a.a:.:.<::::•�:>::Y$Y:::<:}::Y�::::.;»;:::. :.}::;Y;::<.Y:;:��}W<:>}>:.Y}: }>Y>Y.:•::. For KCRS'93,(additional 2.5'base)add: $ 3.13 SY AC Overlay,1.5'AC $ 6.43 SY AC Overlay,2'AC $ 7.61 SY AC Road,2',4'rock,First 2500 SY $ . 14.99 SY AC Road,2',4'rock,Qty.over 2500SY $ 11.62 SY AC Road,3',4'rock,First 2500 SY $ 17.12 SY AC Road,3',4'rock,Qty.over 2500 SY $ 13.76 SY ' AO Road,5',First 2500 SY • $ 12.67 SY AC Road,5',Qty.Over 2500 SY $ 12.12. SY • AC Road,6',First 2500 SY _ $ 14.57 SY AC Road,6',Qty.Over 2500 SY $ 14.02 SY Asphalt Treated Base,4'thick $ 8.01 SY Gravel Road,4'rock,First 2500 SY $ 9.92 SY Gravel Road,4'rock,Qty.over 2500 SY $ 6.55 SY PCC Road,5',no base,over 2500 SY $ 18.70 SY PCC Road, 6',no base,over 2500 SY $ 19.02 SY • Thickened Edge $ 5.99 LF Page 5 or 9 SUBTOTAL • • • *KCC 27A authorizes only one bond reduction. Unit prices updated 12/97 S:PUBLIC\LUSD\LUIS\REFBD SITE BOND QUANTITY WORKSHEET Revision date: R/22/fR Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet ......::.. ..:.....:.....::::.:::::::::..:..;;..........::..� :�lix�> > <?'<<":<>`•i;<�„�>'�� � �utura��?•�bl[��><>� '< <�? r >���rlv�ite<'> ><>�< ��>� >B:cit!'':�elic�cii± «s«?<;:;'` ........... n� e•. .......:.::.::: g.. .�.Mcll ':;tall >Ctl) (Es' ..................................................... ....:......:�;,.. ..... ..�,.:.- � ...... ...... .. .... � fat.... . �:Gurru .tesH�.P� e:.N��:s�r..E ,... . .. :..........:....................:. .:::,:::.:....:..:..::.....................;:::.�::.::::::.:.::................................................. . :•:.:;.�.::.�::;:::. .._...�..::..:.:::......::�or:rr,uluert. .t1�es.:Ax�ra •. ..:. . .a :a ... .. . .........................:..................... s � - � .. .. �I�y�!_:M:..::Ez::•,•'.:s»:��::;:::>:::•<•:,•••� »>:..... � x . :�:Ql.!F`-.&R?�tpxYV..S..51&►1.tt.:11�Sttfll@: 8ffpiafad,t?u.;IS• 19. d Access Road,RID $ 14.56 SY , Bollards-fixed $ 209.34 Each • Bollards-removable $ 393.34 Each •(CBs Include frame and lid) CB Type I $ 1,093.60 Each CB Type IL $ 1,246.60 Each CB Type II,48'diameter $ 1,768.32 Each • for additional depth over 4' • $ 379.58 FT CB Type II,54'diameter $ 1,906.56 Each • for additional depth over 4' $ 423.07 FT CB Type II,60'diameter $ 2,044.80 Each for additional depth over 4' $ 466.56 FT CB Type II,72'diameter $ 2,793.60 Each . for additional depth over 4' $ 601.92 FT Through-curb Inlet Framework(Add) $ 318.34 Each Cleanout,PVC,4" $ 113.52 Each • • Cleanout,PVC,6' $ 152.09 Each Cleanout,PVC,8' $ 194.95 Each • Culvert,PVC,4' $ 7.51 LF Culvert, PVC,6' $ 10.96 LF Culvert, PVC, 8' $ 11.59 LF Culvert, PVC, 12' $ 18.93 LF Culvert,CMP,8' $ 15.00 LF Culvert,CMP, 12' $ 23.00 LF Culvert,CMP, 15' $ 28.46 LF Culvert,CMP, 18' $ 32.82 LF Culvert,CMP,24' $ •46.37 LF Culvert,CMP,30' $ 62.13 LF Culvert,CMP,36' $ 97.49 LF Culvert,CMP,48' $ 122.46 LF • Culvert,CMP,60' $ 204.74 LF Culvert,CMP,72' $ 263.11 LF Page 6 of 9 SUBTOTAL "KCC 27A authorizes only one bond reduction. Unit prices updated 12/97 S:PUBLIC\LUSD\LUIS\REFBD SITE BOND QUANTITY WORKSHEET Revision date: 8/22/98 • Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet .....:..:::.:...:...................... xlsttn .......... :.�:.� ;;>:.::.;::.YY>:::;:.Y....::.:::.::...:::::.�:::::::::::::::..�::.:::::;;Y:.Y:<.Y;.YY.;r.. :,:::...:.,.. ...........r. . ............ :::,:.,.,...:::.,.,.:.:r..:. YYYY:•Y:�YY: ......:........................................n....;•:.::Y..h�'•':i?{:?!:{{:•{:i;...:}::.:;LY;?Y:LN.:•i{.;?4;YY::•Y;:.........::::v... '. ::.... ..:... :.:.:.:.x ..::4:.•.. {{{{{{ `{:•i::{}':::� :::ii'i.:::j::i{::iy::{:?:iL:Y:?{{'r:+:::':?{>l::S:{{$i{:::{:<C::' {:i:{Y�:}::i{Jv{ism::y}i::::::::::,vii::::::'i:,L{}::;: :I 4 :�..Y.<.:>:<.:.:::.>•:::...:.:<:.:r;.�r.Y>:.Y::.::..:l,:.::::r:.:..::•::::::.:::...: r,..,::.,.:.;.. ;;;Y..�:::::::::•�:::�::::....:..s�..;. .<.:....AI N....:1�1� ...: .:.:::. : ::.: .........,..�:.,.:.:.::::::::::...,:........ .:........:......... ...: YY:;::.Y.:.Y::::.;:.;:.YY:.<:::;. . .. :.::.::..Y::.Y: ....:.......Itri...Q•:• R .. .. ..:...:.................... .l�:. a tttas�> '} �rt EMONS Culvert,Concrete,8' $ 18.28 LF • Culvert,Concrete, 12' $ 26.13 LF Culvert,Concrete, 15' $ 32.47 LF . Culvert,Concrete, 18" $ 38.70 LF Culvert,Concrete,24' $ 53.10 LF Culvert,Concrete,30' $ 90.59 LF Culvert,Concrete,36" •$ 119.68 LF Culvert,Concrete,42' $ 137.76 LF Culvert,Concrete,48' . $ 152.99 LF ' Culvert,CPP,6' $ 9.30 LF Culvert,CPP,8' $ 14.00 LF Culvert,CPP, 12' $ 18.00 LF Culvert,CPP,15" $ 20.00 LF • Culvert,CPP,18' $ 24.00 LF • Culvert,CPP,24' $ 32.00 LF Culvert, CPP,30' $ 42.00 LF Culvert,CPP,36' $ 48.00 LF Ditching $ 7.03 CY Flow Dispersal Trench (1,436 base+) $ 22.60 LF French Drain (3'depth) $ 19.65 LF Geotextile,laid in trench,polypropylene $ 2.09 SY Infiltration pond testing $ 65.00 HR - Mid-tank Access Riser,48"dia, 6'deep $ 1,396.00 Each • Pond Overflow Spillway $ 12.18 SY Restrictor/OII Separator, 12' $ 908.86 Each Restrictor/Oil Separator, 15' $ 952.66 Each • Restrictor/Oil Separator, 18' $ 996.66 Each Riprap,placed $ 33.98 CY • Tank End Reducer(36'diameter) $ 870.00 Each Trash Rack, 12' - $ 184.32 Each . Trash Rack, 15' $ 206.32 Each Trash Rack, 18' $ -233.82 Each Trash Rack,21' $ 266.82 Each Page 7 of 9 SUBTOTAL *KCC 27A authorizes only one bond reduction. Unit prices updated,12/97 S:PUBLIC\LUSD\LUIS\REFBD SITE BOND QUANTITY WORKSHEET • Revision date: 8/22/98 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet . .>Futwr....li'4►blla::::::.:::.:.>:;:.�:>.<.:�i:> �> >":::>:.<:.<::;;::; � <�<>; ? ii<��<i'�` iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii ........................ .. O..q :•••• ..,..:.::.:..::.>:.::.......:.::::,::.......... .:.. . ...1� anti..:.;.:::.�..........: �.;:.:::::.:<.:::.:>:.;>:.::.....:::::::::::::>:.>�:.>:::::...:<:::::.>.:.:<...:::.::.:;>:.::::.: ..::<.;:..:•:<::.:.:.. � •:..:.�::::.::::.Gnmplata.�: �ast�<::: �.A�KIN 2'AC,2'top course rock&4'borrow $ 13.77 SY 2'AC, 1.5' top course& 2.5'base course $ 14.99 SY 4'select borrow $ 3.96 -SY 1.5'top course rock&2.5'base course $ 9.92 SY EA. ' EA. SUBTOTAL • SUBTOTAL(SUM ALL PAGES): 30%CONTINGENCY&MOBILIZATION: GRANDTOTAL: • . COLUMN: B C D E Page8of9 • "KCC 27A authorizes only one bond reduction. Unit prices Updated 12/97 S:PUBLIC\LUSD\LUIS\REFBD SITE BOND QUANTITY WORKSHEET Revision date: 8/22/98 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet Original bond computations prepared by: Name: Date: PE Registration Number: Tel.If: Firm Name: Address: . PUBLIC ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PERFORMANCE &DRAINAGE FACILITIES Column BOND"AMOUNT MAINTENANCE/DEFECT Stabilization/Erosion Sediment Control(ESC) (A) $ - BOND"AMOUNT Existing Right-of-Way Improvements (B) $ - Future Public Road Improvements&Drainage Facilities (C) $ - (B+C)X 0.25= $ - Private Improvements (D) $ - (A+B+C+D) =TOTAL(T) $ - PERFORMANCE BOND AMOUNT Minimum bond amount Is$1000. SITE RESTORATION BOND (A) $ - (First$7,500 of bond shall be cash.) RIGHT-OF-WAY BOND (B) $ - • TOTAL RIGHT-OF-WAY&SITE RESTORATION BOND" (A+B) $ - (First$7,500 of bond shall be cash.) PERFORMANCE BOND TOTAL AFTER BOND (T-E) REDUCTION""" NAME OF PERSON PREPARING BOND REDUCTION: Date: 'NOTE:The word"bond'is used to represent any financial guarantee acceptable to King County. "NOTE: KCC 27A authorizes bonds to be combined when both are required. "'NOTE: Per KCC 27A,total bond amounts remaining after reduction shall not be less than 30%of the original amount. Page 9 of 9 Unit prices updated 12/97 S:PUBLIC\LUSD\LUIS\REFBD SITE BOND QUANTITY WORKSHEET Revision date: 8/22/98 • • • After Recording return to: DECLARATION OF COVENANT IN CONSIDERATION of the approved King County permit for application No. relating to real property described as follows: The undersigned as Grantor(s), declares that the above described property is hereby subject to an easement for a natural or constructed conveyance system and hereby dedicates, covenants and agrees as follows: 1. King County shall have the right to ingress and egress over those portions not contained in Exhibit"A" to access such easement area for inspection of and to reasonably monitor the performance, operational flows, or defects in accordance with and [as presented in King County Code Section 9.04.120]. 2. If King County determines that maintenance or repair work is required to be done to the system, the Manager of the Water and Land Resources Division of the King County Department of Natural Resources shall give notice of the specific maintenance and/or repair work required pursuant to K.C.0 9.04.030. The Manager shall also set a reasonable time in which such work is to be completed by the Grantor(s), its heirs or assigns. If the above required maintenance 1 , r • or repair is not completed with the time set by the Manager, the County may perform the required maintenance or repair. Written notice will be sent to the Grantor(s) stating the County's intention to perform such maintenance. Maintenance work will not commence until at least seven (7) days after such notice is mailed. If, within the sole discretion of the Water and Land Resources Division Manager, there exists an imminent or present danger, said seven (7) day notice period will be waived and maintenance and/or repair work will begin immediately. 3. If at any time King County reasonably determines that any existing retention/detention system creates any of the conditions listed in K.C.C. 9.04.030 and herein incorporated by reference, the Water and Land Resources Division Manager may take measures specified therein. 4. The Grantor(s) shall assume all responsibility for the cost of any maintenance and for repairs to the system. Such responsibility shall include reimbursement to the County within thirty (30) days of the receipt of the invoice for any such work performed. Overdue payments will require payment of interest at the current legal rate as liquidated damages. If legal action ensues, the prevailing party is entitled to costs or fees 5. The Grantor(s) is (are) hereby required to obtain written approval from the Water and Land Resources Division Manager of the King County Department of Natural Resources prior to filling, piping, cutting, or removing vegetation (except in routine landscape maintenance) in open vegetated drainage facilities (such as swales, channels, ditches, ponds, etc.), or performing any alterations or modifications to the drainage facilities contained within said drainage easement. Any notice or consent required to be given or otherwise provided for by the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective upon personal delivery, or three (3) days after mailing by Certified Mail, return receipt requested. 2 , • • 6. This agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties, and supercedes all prior discussions, negotiations, and all agreements whatsoever whether oral or written. This covenant is intended to protect the value and desirability of the real property described above; and shall insure to the benefit of all the citizens of King County, and shall be binding on all heirs, successors and assigns. OWNER OWNER STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING )ss. On this day personally appeared before me: , to me known to be the individual(s) described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein stated. Given under my hand and official seal this day of , 199 NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at My Commission Expires: 3 • SECTION XI • • • AKB Engineers,,Inc. T:\9200132\9200I32tir.doc\Page 33 XI.MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION MANUAL NOT APPLICABLE AKB Engineers,Inc. T:\9200132\9200132tir.doc\Page 34 REFERENCES • AKB Engineers.Inc. T:1200132\200132tir.doc\I2.'12;00 jXING COUNTY, WASh INGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL (2) CN values can be area weighted when they apply to pervious areas of similar CN's (within 20 CN points). However, high CN areas should not be combined with low CN areas (unless the low CN areas are less than 15% of the subbasin). In this case, separate hydrographs should be generated and summed to form one hydrograph. FIGURE 3.5.2A HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP OF THE SOILS IN KING COUNTY HYDROLOGIC HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP GROUP* SOIL GROUP GROUP* Alderwood C Orcas Peat D Arents, Alderwood Material C Oridia D Arents, Everett Material B Ovall C Beausite C Pilchuck C Bellingham D Puget D Briscot D Puyallup B Buckley D Ragnar B Coastal Beaches Variable Renton D Earimont Silt Loam D Riverwash Variable Edgewick C Salal C Everett A/B 'Sammamish D Indianola A Seattle D Kitsap C Shacar D Klaus C Si Silt C Mixed Alluvial Land Variable Snohomish D Neilton A Sultan C Newberg B Tukwila D Nooksack C Urban Variable Normal Sandy Loam D Woodinville D HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP CLASSIFICATIONS A. (Low runoff potential). Soils having high infiltration rates, even when thoroughly wetted, and consisting chiefly of deep,well-to-excessively drained sands or gravels. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. B. (Moderately low runoff potential). Soils having moderate infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted, and consisting chiefly of moderately fine to moderately coarse textures. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. C. (Moderately high runoff potential). Soils having slow infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted, and consisting chiefly of soils with a layer that impedes downward movement of water, or soils with moderately fine to fine textures. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. D. (High runoff potential). Soils having very slow infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted and consisting chiefly of clay soils with a high swelling potential, soils with a permanent high water table, soils with a hardpan or clay layer at or near the surface, and shallow soils over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. • * From SCS,TR-55, Second Edition, June 1986, Exhibit A-1. Revisions made from SCS, Soil Interpretation Record, Form #5, September 1988. • 3.5.2-2 11/92 � �. WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL "� `,�"•I 1V LI COUNTY, W H J rl l 1`I V . v ,., .� .. a • TABLE 3.5.2B SCS WESTERN WASHINGTON RUNOFF CURVE NUMBERS • • SCS WESTERN WASHINGTON RUNOFFCURVE NUMBERS (Published by SCS in 1982) Runoff curve numbers for selected agricultural, suburban and urban land use for Type 1A rainfall distribution, 24-hour storm duration. CURVE NUMBERS BY HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP LAND USE DESCRIPTION A B C D. Cultivated land(1): winter condition 86 91 94 95 Mountain open areas: low growing brush and grasslands 74 82 89 92 Meadow or pasture: 65 78 85 89 Wood or forest land: undisturbed or older second growth 42 64 76 81 Wood or forest land: young second growth or brush 55 72 81 86 Orchard: with cover crop 81 88 92 94 • Open spaces, lawns, parks, golf courses, cemeteries, landscaping. good condition: grass cover on 75% or more of the area 68 80 86 90 fair condition: grass cover on 50% to 75% of the area 77 85 90 92 Gravel roads and parking lots 76 85 89 91 Dirt roads and parking lots 72 82 87 89 • Impervious surfaces, pavement, roofs, etc. 98 98 98 98 Open water bodies: lakes, wetlands, ponds, etc. 100 100 100 100 Single Family Residential (2) Dwelling Unit/Gross Acre % Impervious (3) • 1.0 DU/GA 15 Separate curve number 1.5 DU/GA 20 shall be selected 2.0 DU GA 25 for pervious and 2.5 DU/GA 30 impervious portion 3.0 DU/GA 34 of the site or basin 3.5 DU/GA 38 4.0 DU/GA 42 4.5 DU/GA 46 5.0 DU/GA 48 5.5 DU/GA 50 6.0 DU/GA 52 6.5 DU/GA 54 7.0 DU/GA 56 Planned unit developments, % impervious condominiums, apartments, must be computed commercial business and industrial areas. (1) For a more detailed description of agricultural land use curve numbers refer to National Engineering Handbook, Section 4, Hydrology, Chapter 9, August 1972. (2) Assumes roof and driveway runoff is directed into street/storm system. (3) The remaining pervious areas (lawn) are considered to be in good condition for these curve numbers. 3.5.2-3 • 11/92 ... •. n , v O T /7 N M A N 1I A L. r� . .CI.NG COUNTY, WASHINGTON. SURFACE yr i+ . ER L V � I G •• FIGURE 3.5.1C 2-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS / '''...\---7-...i.LAILli104411:14114if 4 ri- -4.1141104b-:1;ra- ' T .- -- --v1.4" ." ' S.1".. --- . 1 "poioil voiti-,i or,•\ Dviiignaw lik„,, ‘ ‘ , , ram'- ,,st s 124 41611 .1;011014" • •• 10 I iiinVipinglIr-- 1 -A .4til AVIA 1 CV • 19. / -L,5,-*-1.11,4111r/l -I lit** 440 )y1 .4. \ ,,,,„Arl.„41rs, klitiowl ii,ifil . .1 0) IQ . aw..,, - , ,,,K. A" _46 - . cv o I <--- • .M'iPalii: :11" 1142loteliii7 k \ ':4... 7444 " Alkeit A ILA •:01111111EMIIMMEM10. 10#' trOlif . ) 4.--.. Viiiii _ ._a or ,. < < c14ik ! 4! JW414V ul • 1.,07" 4 1/4. (t0,_141.1.-.4 4 4i .-z, .-- Ik' ---. -1111 ) ' ci. ti\-\%rt - - -: Ne: - ,./ a esi -R\ :-.-_-,4,51 . i , . ._ A.\-1),,: , _ _ 'wit h& . ' ,,,...erti\ : ;4 ! . .. IF 3 iti, 7,41 --1, , • 1 ig-, ./, , . ,,,11,pris,„4 ,,p) klANN 4k. , /ji :,.; .1 C . 1 ill -P.Alli N % i / 1 !ii ivit __a --...41/4\ . / re t-;..-. iltal 0 ,- 10-= - ' Nii; • Nirmaili, - 4011 Thal • - A\ -‘ i -: .:. - -= 1 rt4— -''' b4 17 WI 11=. ' # N , - I tigin _ - .,,... 11. irp.mi i- -`.- 'Iii d 'Ps i 1 th. \ _,.. ..: ..,:cfli ) 1 ac„.11. _ ...e.s. , ifisil ion, Ism ,s;N:7?___ \ 15.1c,,avo 7/,/ vriz„lii b. it mitillii- liii k• : VS.' ‘‘) / , '../-- .:. Iriumiiiin(,, R..kr- risak vosii , i. - __--losiplish itip111,116,4k - - - - ‘ _ \: _ _„...... ,., , tri . \. ...,, •. -- optig_ ,Npri.-- -Ath '. - 4 - --- s;--, 48'41 Film , N 16 k:4 r . i L i L r: � r r . - - , .11 ,0, iv - .; --Ill ._____. __.. ,..,Igo , ii - t 2-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION i laIRRAL 1 0.3.4°1'1' ISOPLUVIALS OF 2-YEAR 24-HOUR 41► .40' 35TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES '01,911 - ti M ff - - .,,,t • 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Mll•s •, . / ry N ry� �T��'` 1:300,00o 3.5.1-8 ` f 1 l90 r. W a T r. n r E c r !_ N laA N U A 1. ;_ KING CUuNTT r, W AJH1NU l UN, S Unrn ... G rr n un ✓ + .+ • `+ ._ _ _ • FIGURE 3.5.1E 10-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS 2.1 22 ..•`l---- ii f� * .tt4 wit', # ` { .\ - 01#1,ft - 23 ) - -----z 4 ar rti_• i■E�'alirr pal rip 1 O -'fir 1. 2-4 .........t 1.1artal altd AR ,P N .r. = ..4 25 .: Aglefatti le jirrArrillir- ' Ilk . .,, 2.7 i •41111ar kR144111T04 ki ' -00,T- , 2.8 . _ 7-- _I!IM ..Lirr_r, -: -lib jr"le eitA V .. , . ,,, , - 4i - -*Fe :Iv- ! .;i9P mok\*_VkviorAL I ---t._ <9 *\. It '.° 1 . - F AL 1 -- ,L4 yr he if 'i y "Ilair_NywillI,Aljj, ca- 3.0 \ '' -7\ ... 11.11P- —111.4fitirtlilig_h""f tr). ' IN ini, s. , ._ ,,,, ,:,.‘,„,‘,, ..._ r `54SISTIRPHIL/ / :it- galtrW % I ... .• 1‘1"111 : rt°411P` will ' !fit:. .2: 31 ►ii - Aigt .tilri 4. 54°111111.11k1 ems".::a . "ai 101,41 �.� . . , '0 1 fit 4Te "' 14 ... , Ampaiv`1401, • 4141 f 1 i k le' FA -.4: , .., goo ,* i ___::::..,,_,,s an i - --\ nil V kh, - ipt 4‘ . 'r- A. - i -: if ' litilANL i pme. Isk i- L . -1\y„,\ \4.%, ', 0it/ ,111,14,11N dew� !i ** ._.4 i (014k1111. \ "---- 'a ' I ot 10" --• r,,-.ii III It N r. All WM I % ripb= 4 V1111111111pr Nina It ..ir / -•jip ;-"-- ...r.1 Nwitg; !IA '\,,, '`\ --= it , ,, .. I . 0. .litil WO, gummy' ,k r=1 iir digilt,11.1) lifirit.'-- .,‘17 lowninguira ill*:11114: • ' . / ---:(9 r411 -TA i, �_ li'A %pm W ivy--` ,.,_0. 111114 01141164419 4,1 \ i .... •7 .\. ,. ......,... ,..,...„...,,,,„ 1.4 Fitr . 1.7-\,.. . i te, nt, i _Iti. amialsoli4_ Mil=k7800m111/8 0 .. . • . . 4::::" at tar WOOS .P. 1 *04 --t\-‘..40 �. tkr1 :..., , IM l � yam, 'i /Ii - - ---- V. 10-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION r �,� ' 1101 ar tarVial - 3.41!' ISOPLUVIALS OF 10-YEAR 24-HOUR ft' O lifip TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES 3. ,` �� - ,(:. 3 Z •4, 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 e Muss ��� T-=t'� 1r, .. ,....,.,,,, 3.5.1-10 3ny 1/90 40 I ,-, KING COUNTY. WA .SH ! Nr: TON SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL • I - I FIGURE 3.5.1F 25-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS - --- _ . <a •,. -140VVItoraki 14-- A '-'',. f . 1 - Is :: aborigik .I k illy i i ... 11111nratillg , . 1 _isolot 9 . v . 1e re 7 ,T Ns,. 4 00 ./. •- •larilt ‘7. ,...gegnriiiiriViptip.,_ . I3.3 :' liirlii4—.1•4.- i-- Slit 114r1 , • . . 34 i .' :----g-ill' 4 -. -. I -- .grii.V.,,I ir....--. ki ci - i .., ,. - \ _ piakipi!.,„. _ ,o.... - Owl 'Ng,* . li 16 ., 4 •4., . 1 • -ci .fir ' — ,d t ftim i" .'' ,� . - '-, \ 4*4 --tiii -' .. ,z,,,r4.1tAwAL). woll110 ;* . : ler, smoinoir_„44.. . . '6%- • 4' . &IV. lia \ ' T FikA. ‘r .� �i �4�%' I -0 . ‘. •- • .11M- . 110.7). r gy ( Nwittfirsaw.------ -',‘"%r—A, ; 111114W\T. — ?- ,/,..., kit _ tigyrArpow. vls.1 \ w a 1 0.„ / . ---, ....4.11 1_ _._,.L., _ .. ‘ N _ - i, ../•- il '''i - •- % '.. 15.1% i.• (s f —‘111141141/ \ =.- — •*"ir- I? .11:-: . ( . — .11i1 ‘7,0 • • iiktilAb . .2. 1. 4 . . I : 9 1 :...-st\ .• .r, illiti,t., ,-,t, rw,,,,,",‘1/44\i\-\_ . A 5.5 .. iwili 41"9-1 = - -ITN ,,,,,,,, : . \ ii. ,.. I I__ , ,.--- • -4,i 4.14 . I t 1 —ilk • - x , _=. . i ', ' li " \ --A.-4 - — , , _ `- t\ to = s's , .-ktVIIra r . ir :. .., , :- . ._ .. .:::1.7r. ids, lin \I 1 jaramroiri i I .. . ,.--.,.1 ; ‘ Imp'. wail . • ,.. .. r _ i ‘ . ---t- 1 - e 1 . ‘ ,.._. :soltalwr ilk \\,:_.. ...... .,.. ._ ;464,16,114 vs: " (,01, 11,1. 11 ,Id, • talk , ...‘ in,........,„..., , \-iik, It 't A lird:. ' ti IN'i . tc' . . . __AiLii"kail fil. t. _ _-_._, - - ' - - Vi . ill A c' . ANN_ .i I A -.:..-j • 1/44 \ PRECIPITATION a '.• AI� �ArM ``•• SS 25-YEAR 24-HOUR ,� $3.4 ISOPLUVIALS OF 25-YEAR 24-HOUR y kWAllifitrikiiii T 4 - TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES 3• 6 OW .S • 4\7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 MIIss (5. t J Q y ` -" "► 3.5.1-11 n• tv 1/90 1:300.000 - ICING COUNTY. W ASHINGTUN, J UKYAC z rr #% i cn DEGIGN M AN :.; ,-, :. cl rd ♦ FIGURE 3.S.1H 100-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS • �iiá4èI' A p :;. . I. (ILsoli : • 4 Ifil IVIawe. , at,'.. a401011111iniiitamegb ) 1 r ) 4.0 ! *3tHrtensift-u.ii‘.=,:ei.- -1._., 7 lik = 41 ' _ --N,LANtilitistri 91-64,S./W '. . ." i. 4 • trk*PP4W.10'iggi* , • e ifili / 4.3 ) ., - qt*AVO: '.- ltiek-iragi '' ,4ifili3Or 1 co.i . *14:44,11 _.-77dalpreffirialli6iiisdat • ...t; 44 ''',-) '''''' , 110. i -- . ViliOPPY05-----=--- .44 ' W:- ) . i""VO...04 . algratrtfitf -'14.1_' .'d4 It\ Is A 0 0*.:(41 ° f y, �‘34§ 1 intakweli .41brapnocri '1111h 1 kir si,. ii;''''P' A A f A ..tie Vacsul - • - --/ At V 1. ----411‘‘ ‘P MIPrAff414t, 16 ..i ; --in% k AtFait - - v P-7-16 ----- wi . . .. ilk p.. ...,, • /-1, • yAl los IA \IF �_ � .. IitikAr ll 1� `� _. � �►� - •� � Inii .1 %0 ! / ,,_ ,,V4 • ft lilf . ti" ANI, '‘ ' NIP I /.---. i ilisilkt "- .1 !I II) =Lill -- own ,,,,c,,i..,1. s , \ `lww� f i , azift:vk . 1 Vre IlitrAiii1400 16# --- , '\ii I, -i - ..:—.1, ,, , ,",, ,,..E...,„,...iii, , .-- :, id / r ii \- .-.2- ly i v -- - ,,.,day ls.ai1nii.t-r;u�ti n _ 1 i ii1f0r41 - - ,_ al„ A. ;pfiee ki4171 L 9 , '. iroi4- r � ' 4 . fir �------- -- � � i . I , _ -_..a o ` c) VMS_ .tv mitivip‘ 100-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION V••• W4 11IIPEIPIV4I71I1;._.-. , -. 6'5-. 3.4 ISOPLUVIALS OF 100-YEAR 24-HOUR O` prN ti , iit nir" _ $.5 TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES 0v. 0 1 2 3 4 S 6 7 6 Mlles Di� _� - 3.5.1-13 �O 1190 1:300.000 „• K1r.NG COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE wA 1 tK DESIUN MANUAL 4 "C" Values The allowable runoff coefficients to be used in this method are shown in Table 4.3.3A by type of land cover. These values were selected following a review of the values previously acceptable for use in the Rational Method in King County and as described in several engineering handbooks. The values for single family residential areas were computed as composite values (as illustrated below) based on the estimated percentage of coverage by roads, roofs, yards and unimproved areas for each density. For drainage basins containing several land cover types, the following formula may be used to compute a composite runoff coefficient "Cc" Cc = ((C1 x A,) + (C2xA2)+... + (CnxAn))/A1 where: A, = total area (acres) A1.2.n = areas of land cover types (acres) C,.2,n = runoff coefficients for each area land cover type TABLE 4.3.3A RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS - "C" VALUES FOR THE RATIONAL METHOD GENERAL LAND COVERS LAND COVER C j LAND COVER Dense forest ! 0.10 Playgrounds 0.30 Light forest 0.15 Gravel areas 0.80 Pasture 0.20 i Pavement and roofs 0.90 Lawns- 0:25 Open water (pond, .1.00 lakes, wetlands) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AREAS (Density is in dwelling units per gross acreage (DU/GA)) LAND COVER 1 LAND COVER DENSITY I C DENSITY 0.20 DU/GA (1 unit per 5 ac.) i 0.17 J 3.00 DU/GA 0.42 0.40 DU/GA (1 unit per 2.5 ac.) 0.20 3.50 DU/GA 0.45 0.80 DU/GA (1 unit per 1.25 ac.) 0.27 4.00 DU/GA 0.48 1.00 DU/GA 0.30 4.50 DU/GA 0.51 1.50 DU/GA 0.33 5.00 DU/GA 0.54 2.00 DU/GA 0.36 5.50 DU/GA 0.57 2.50 DU/GA 0.39 6.00 DU/GA 0.60 For land covers not listed above, an area-weighted "C x At" sum should be computed based on the following equation: C x,4 = (C,xA,) + (C2xA2) + ...+(C,,xAn), where A, = (A, + A2 + ...+An), the total drainage basin area. (For use only in determining peak design flow for analyzing and sizing pipes, culverts or channels) el ia ' F3us i Ems, ;. :d lJ 4.3.3-2 1/90 • 17ttic. ENWRONMENTAL- ASSOCIATES, INC. 2122- 112th Avenue North East,Suite B-100 Bellevue,Washington 98004 (425)455-9025 G FAX:(425)455-2316 P1 PO February 10, 2000 1. 1-CA JN 9319-1 Ms. Bev Starkovich 810 North Riverside Drive *: C Renton, Washington 98055 Subject: SUBSURFACE SAMPLING &TESTING Commercial Property 75- 77 Burnett Avenue South Renton,Washington Dear Ms. Starkovich: Environmental Associates, Inc. (EAI) has completed preliminary subsurface sampling of soil and groundwater on the subject property,along with laboratory testing of selected soil and groundwater samples,in an effort to assess the potential for the presence of gasoline,kerosene,diesel,and heavy- oil range petroleum hydrocarbons, as well as gasoline-associated benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene(BTEX)constituents.This report,prepared in accordance with the terms of our proposal dated January 20,2000,summarizes our approach to the project along with results and conclusions. The contents of this report are confidential and are intended solely for your use and the use of your representatives. Two (2) copies of this report are being distributed to you at the address indicated above, and two (2) copies are being distributed to Mr. Larry Hard, 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2400, Seattle,Washington,98104.No other distribution or discussion of this report will take place without your prior approval in writing. On January 24, 2000, three(3) Strataprobe borings ("direct-push"hydraulic and percussion drive- point sampling system)were completed on the subject site at the approximate localities designated as B-5,B-6,and B-7(southern portion of the"Starkovich property")on the attached Site Exploration Map, Plate 2, along with sampling of soils and groundwater at each exploration locality. Relying upon results of laboratory testing,it would appear that soils and groundwater sampled from exploration localities B-5, B-6, and B-7 did not contain detectable concentrations of gasoline, kerosene, diesel, and heavy-oil range petroleum hydrocarbons, or gasoline-associated BTEX constituents. ., _l • ,ter.7Af�i Associate Offices: Oregon/San Francisco Bay Area ..y!ro t 1 • Ms. Bev Starkovich JN 9319-1 February 10, 2000 Page - 2 We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this assignment. If you have any questions or if we may be of additional service,please do not hesitate to contact us. Respectfully submitted, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. ( I)11 Don W. Spencer, .Sc.,P.G., R.E.A. Principal Registered Site Assessor/Licensed UST Supervisor State Certification#947458636 License: W000010 (Washington) License: 11464 (Oregon) License: 876 (California) License: 5195 (Illinois) License: 0327 (Mississippi) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. ' ' c • Ms. Bev Starkovich JN 9319-1 February 10, 2000 Page - 8 LABORATORY ANALYSIS Laboratory analysis was completed on selected soil and groundwater samples from borings B-5,B-6, and B-7 using gas chromatography by WDOE methods NWTPH-Gas/BTEX and NWTPH-Dx Extended for the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons in the gasoline range, along with gasoline- associated benzene,toluene,ethylbenzene,and xylene(BTEX),and kerosene,diesel,and heavy-oil range petroleum hydrocarbons. • Soil samples submitted for laboratory analysis from each boring were chosen on the basis of proximity to the groundwater table(approximately 12 feet in depth below the ground surface at the time of our field effort). The laboratory report is appended to this report. The following tables summarize the results of laboratory testing. The results of EAI's earlier testing for borings B-1 through B-4 are also included in the following tables for comparison purposes. -:-`:,.�'> -....-'y,;rrxrtg*y�a;b�a.;.,,�.:�:F,.�.._ °t3i-v�': - -�c.o-,�ss^^ - - srWis' r.:,�r_ -,,",._.;:.�.'; _ _ _ 'xhi.. yi.g .-k:w .L'i�"��:x-.."z.''Y-t, Y»., Li•.L:'�{..4• -.'�2,"5.41..,.rt. - Y.4.1:'a;'s:A f.. '%`.f'4 a�iy J'�S.i' -.�''.'yi: .r4;.•. �:�.clL:: MYf�°�,y�:,3a ' - ->t!�: -I;--» .s 'ivy. ,a'-., i=L-,: v`a+ � -;..L.,.fir.,_-sa}��.�=i-� :=���..x dal }:; - -yr - ,"? ter. ,:+- :r�.=r,c,.,x„_..�s-.-.^.j�.4.As",a �=w�� Laborafo �Te�t n '�Resi ts:�=y=S`od-' W�T�r� <�as:B <w... ::�y..:,,° .-�, .s_ nc' �'tc .1:��1.dr.»",,,,3^„ €:. "aon .`.=,5•E.�ay.^^r.„ t�2�.w.`�-..., 7,_.•.�:� :.e:s,-;;;;._ .,.:.. 'w,t'" ...3.N�;�.:�� ..kc. � y�P� -C-. �._. -f`, ,• ��:.��� .4<; {, 'suit ,a d.1 Its Ill={ V�l'�ts= a mlllean=s ��=�:;. - ., Sample NWTPH-Gas Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes Number/Depth (gasoline range) W� 43l - s, __,54, ,ai f-+s. !ji�.;twL:kr�'YY44i'-�7 YJ$Y2�;�j�.'h•':� --• '' , 1.2 4.2 B-2@6' (6'-7') ��..>,ti,ws�4Qz,�...;3��r� ND 0.5 B-3@8' (8'-9') ND ND ND ND ND B-4@12' (12'-13'1 `w �.; 4'(}3'001 ND 1.2 0.18 2.9 B-5@12' (12'-13') ND ND ND ND ND B-6@12' (12'-13') ND ND ND ND ND B-7@12' (12'-13') ND ND ND ND ND Reporting Limit2 5.0 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 Cleanup Level' 100 0.5 40 20 20 NOTES: 1 - "ND" denotes analyte not detected at or above listed Reporting Limit. 2 - "Reporting Limit" represents the laboratory lower quantitation limit. 3 - Method A soil cleanup levels as offered in the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA), Chapter 173-340-740 WAC. Shading denotes reported concentration exceeds the current WDOE Method A cleanup level. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. • • Ms. Bev Starkovich JN 9319-1 February 10, 2000 Page - 9 • tArw•'.+':t•9:."L�'.,"•:._:r•.....->Y>nc.•_:«;,., ze'n'4 '�.Y<'. :a4;S:,- -^.V�&:.S' _ _ ,.rts- �::" - ..�._..F - �aF'"..'�i: "�R'2-'ice .�a•"�':�;^�a,.%T S.' 1'"c`t_. P:. :Y. .'W •2•____ _ .L {i"f"� `5 ^'i✓'>5"�.}i 3 - �Y T a,.te_. "�'..���.<.. "s't,°.• ..h.^"ai �i�'xG r.a'_a. -F�.�.4�.,.�.=;zq::',v::-. .ti'�-l�rt .a:k*'•,i.;r;•ai' .4 - �'.i�,is �•F1 -.T�' �a — +h i�:+G�i.i�v- .;I.� `�•b�c..t.?i';^� �� ,. -a�:,V101: ''":#or Tess 0 `its-..0Soll�--. V-g:_#® 40 . .>l �: e > _. _.. r sic_ a-�+�,. «.:z�: 4y-k� `e r.a. ��:' �,-�..>. i '' � :zri :44c3's�S'�$.r:,�.3.�. a. tt�= ,..'l,a.y, z , ' t�ced;t,4 "�'�sCi '� ..... ;.......:�'...:.�.xsk 3,... . :>,a,. 4,A I:�rest a d° in ts: r?'- :�I io �, m E.�� <:,:4 -;�.-Y�.,:=>�'�_~::� -. �k:>..�._..��M^".,....�.�..,....<,�:� ��;��,.�.,�...H_aMt�..�.� 1�...:���,....�.MN...t��.� ;;��...�.xl,:���.l�R....:r1.u:..�x<.......,.n�:,�,h„=,:�.t,:,:.�_.}:.:.�..,.=.gi,. Sample Number/Depth NWTPH-Dx NWTPH-Dx NWTPH-Dx ..(kerosene range) • (diesel range) (heavy-oil range) kWek.z `: `:•-'- iv�;v�:.'t.I.r.";'4`3^;3 n'.?�,'•y9y`$'�?r:"a`#4 �I:`:�''' a.'ter t? a:+ B 2 6' 6' 7' a€ ,'..utm 4 :: c, ks, :<.; _ ::z,z .. i;Z t ND B-3@8' (8'-9') ND ND ND gAggligMaIMIMOR B-4@12' (12'-13') ''z 15Q:4 =n ND ND B-5@12' (12'-13') ND ND ND B-6@12' (12'-13') ND ND ND B-7@12' (12'-13') ND ND ND Reporting Limit2 20 20 50 Cleanup Level' 200 200 200 NOTES: 1 - "ND" denotes analyte not detected at or above listed Reporting Limit. • 2 - "Reporting Limit" represents the laboratory lower quantitation limit. 3 - Method A soil cleanup levels as offered in the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA), Chapter 173-340-740 WAC. Shading denotes that the reported concentration exceeds the current WDOE Method A cleanup level. Relying upon the results of laboratory analysis as summarized in the preceding tables, and as included in the laboratory reports appended to this report, it would appear that soils sampled at localities B-5,B-6,and B-7 do not contain concentrations of gasoline,kerosene,diesel,and/or heavy oil range petroleum hydrocarbons, or gasoline-associated BTEX constituents. As summarized in EAI's September 1999 report regarding borings B-1 through B-4, it would also appear that soil sampled at boring localities B-1, B-2, and B-4 contain concentrations of gasoline- range petroleum hydrocarbons, along with kerosene and/or diesel-range petroleum hydrocarbons, in excess of the current WDOE Method A cleanup levels for these contaminants in soil. No concentrations of gasoline, kerosene, diesel, or heavy-oil range petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in soil tested from boring B-3. Groundwater samples were subjected to the identical testing methodologies which were completed on the selected soil samples. The following tables summarize the results of laboratory testing of groundwater samples. The results of our earlier testing study (EAI, .September 1999) are also included in the following tables for comparison purposes. • ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. . . . ^ ` ^ ` Ms. BenStarkonich JN9319-1 February 10, 2000 Page - 10 Sample Number 0VVTPH-Gas Benzene Toluene Ethylbanomua Xyomes (gasoline range) 8'1 GVV 510 ND` ND 2.3 8.8 8'2 GVV 230 ND ND ND ND B'3 GVV ND ND ND ND ND 8'4GVV 750 1.3 ND ND B'5 GVV ND ND ND ND ND B'8 GVV ND ND ND ND ND B'7 GVV ND ND ND ND ND Reporting Umbz 100 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Cleanup Level' 1008 5.0 40 30 20 NOTES: 1 ' "ND" denotes onalytn not detected at or above listed Reporting Limit. 2 "Reporting Unuit^ represents the laboratory (ummrquandt,tion limit. 3 ' Method A groundwater cleanup levels as offered in the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA), Chapter 173'340-720VVAC. Shading denotes reported concentration exceeds the current VVDUE Method A cleanup level. Sample Number NVVTPH'0o NWTPH-0x NVVTPH-mx (kerosene range) (diesel range) (beavy'oOs/nge) B'l GVV ND 0D ND 8'2 GVV ND NO ND B'3 GVV ND 0D ND B'4 GVV ND ND ND B'5 GVV ND ND ND B'O GYV ND ND ND ' B'7 GVV ND NU ND Reporting Limit' 200 200 500 C|oanupLovo|" 1000 lDDn 1080 NOTES: 1 ' "ND" unncuoo ana|ytonnt detected ,tvrabove listed Reporting Limit. 2 ' "Reporting Limit" represents the laboratory lower qvontit,tion limit. 3 ' Method A groundwater cleanup levels as offered in the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA), Chapter l73'34O'72OVVAC' Shading denotes that the reported concentration exceeds the current VVDOE Method A cleanup level. ENVIRONMENTAL�������� INC. Ms. Bev Starkovich JN 9319-1 February 10, 2000 Page - 11 Relying upon the results of laboratory analysis as summarized in the preceding tables, and as included in the laboratory reports appended to this report,it would appear that groundwater sampled from borings B-5,B-6,and B-7 does not contain concentrations of gasoline,kerosene,diesel,and/or heavy oil range petroleum hydrocarbons, or gasoline-associated BTEX constituents. As previously discussed in EAI's September 1999 report, it would also appear that groundwater sampled at boring localities B-1, B-2, B-3, and B-4 does not contain concentrations of gasoline, kerosene, diesel, and/or heavy-oil range petroleum hydrocarbons in excess of the current WDOE Method A cleanup levels for these contaminants in groundwater, with the exception of a concentration of benzene (12 ppb) detected in groundwater sampled at boring locality B-4 which exceeds the current WDOE Method A cleanup level of 5 ppb. ON CLUSI ONIPiREGOIVIMEIN DATI ONS .s y•.:.. .-�:y As discussed in the preceding report sections,the findings of this current sampling and testing effort suggest that soils and groundwater on the southern portion of the Starkovich property at exploration localities B-5,B-6, and B-7 do not contain detectable concentrations of gasoline, kerosene, diesel, and/or heavy oil range petroleum hydrocarbons, or gasoline-associated BTEX constituents. As discussed in EAI's September 1999 report, the findings of our previous study suggested that shallow soils at the site at exploration localities B-1, B-2, and B-3 contained concentrations of gasoline-range petroleum hydrocarbons, as well as kerosene and/or diesel-range petroleum hydrocarbons,exceeding the current WDOE Method A cleanup level for these contaminants in soil. The highest concentrations of these contaminants appeared to be present at depths ranging from approximately 3 feet to 11 feet below the ground surface at boring localities B-1 and B-2(proximal to the former tank cluster),and at a depth range of approximately 11 feet to 13 feet below the ground surface at exploration locality B-4 (adjacent to the loading dock of a warehouse space and to the interpreted locality of former underground fuel piping). Testing of groundwater sampled from borings B-1 through B-4 revealed that, at the localities sampled, it does not appear that the petroleum contaminants identified in site soils are present in groundwater at concentrations exceeding the current WDOE Method A cleanup levels for these contaminants, with the exception of benzene detected in groundwater sampled from boring B-4 at a concentration slightly exceeding the WDOE Method A cleanup level for benzene. Please refer to EAI's September 21, 1999 report for discussions of viable cleanup actions which may lead to site remediation for the northern part of the Starkovich property(addressed as 73 Burnett Ave S.) which was formerly occupied by the bulk fuel facility. Decision-making authority regarding selection and implementation of appropriate corrective actions at the site clearly lies with the property owner. Depending on your current needs, EAI can prepare written cost estimates/work proposals to perform the corrective actions discussed in the referenced report. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Ms. Bev Starkovich JN 9319-1 February 10, 2000 Page - 12 ; L ... .. .•....o: I IT" T This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Ms. Bev Starkovich, along with her several representatives, for specific application to this site. Our work for this project was conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill normally exercised by members of the environmental science profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the area, and in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in our proposal dated January 20, 2000. The findings and conclusions of this study are based upon observations and testing made at separated boring locations on the subject property. Conditions may vary between the borings or at other locations and/or depths. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. If new information is developed in future site work which may include excavations, borings, studies, analyses, etc., Environmental Associates,Inc.,must be retained to reevaluate the conclusions of this report and to provide amendments as required. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. APPENDIX Laboratory Report • 1 FEB• E8 10 2009 TRANSGLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL GEOSCIENCES NORTHWEST, INC. 800 Sleater-Kinney SE, PMB #262 Lacey,Washington 98503-1127 Mobile Environmental Laboratories Telephone: 360-459-4670 Environmental Sampling Services Fax: 360-459-3432 February 8, 2000 Jim Ruef Environmental Associates 2122 112th Ave. NE, Suite B-100 Bellevue, WA 98004 Dear Mr. Ruef: Please find enclosed the analytical data report for the Renton Project in Renton, Washington. Soil and water samples were analyzed for Diesel and Oil by NWTPH- Dx/Dx Extended, Gasoline by NWTPH-Gx, and BTEX by Method 8021B on January 25, 2000. The results of these analyses are summarized in the attached table. All soil values are reported on a dry weight basis. Applicable detection limits and QA/QC data are included. An invoice for this analytical work is also enclosed. TEG Northwest appreciates the opportunity to have provided analytical services to Environmental Associates for this project. If you have any further questions about the data report, please give me a call. It was a pleasure working with you on this project, and we are looking forward to the next opportunity to work together. Sincerely, ., (i(a0,„070(--/Levl, Michael A. Korosec President • OA/OC FOR ANALYTICAL METHODS GENERAL The TEG Northwest Laboratory quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) procedures are conducted following the guidelines and objectives which meet or exceed certification/-accreditation requirements of California DOHS, Washington DOE, and Oregon DEQ. The Quality Control Program is a consistent set of procedures which assures data quality through the use of appropriate blanks, replicate analyses, surrogate spikes, and matrix spikes, and with the use of reference standards that meet or exceed EPA standards. When analyses are taking place on-site with the mobile lab, the need for Field Blanks or Travel/Trip Blanks is eliminated. If there is going to be a delay before sample preparation for analysis, the sample is stored at 4° C. ANALYTICAL METHODS TEG Northwest Labs use analytical methodologies which are in conformity with U. S. Environmental Protection Agency(EPA), Washington DOE, and Oregon DEQ methodologies. When necessary and appropriate due to the nature or composition of the sample, TEG may use variations of the methods which are consistent with recognized standards or variations used by the industry and government laboratories. TPH-Gasoline, TPH-Diesel (Gasoline and/or Diesel, Modified EPA 8015, NWTPH-Gx and NWTPH-Dx) A check standard is run at the beginning of the day. 1) A close standard is run at the end of the day. 2) Both open and close standards must be within 15% of the continuing calibration curve value. All samples are prepared with a surrogate spike, and the recovery must be between 65% and 135% unless high sample concentrations interfere with the determination of the recovery percentage. A duplicate sample is run at a rate of 1 per 10 samples. At least 1 method blank is run per 20 samples analyzed. Purgeable Volatile Aromatics (BTEX,EPA 8021B) A check standard is run at the beginning of the day. The check standard is run at the end of the day. Both open and close standards must be within 15% of the continuing calibration curve value. All samples are prepared with a surrogate spike, and the recovery must be between 65% and 135%unless high sample concentrations interfere with the determination of the recovery percentage. At least 1 method blank is run per day. • TEG NW SEATTLE CHEMISTRY LABORATORY (425)957-9872,fax(425)957-9904 TEG Job Number: S00125-1 Client: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES Client Job Name: RENTON Client Job Number: JN 9319-1 Analytical Results DUPL NWTPH-Gx/BTEX MTH BLK LCS B5 @12' B6 a@12' B6 @12' B7 @12' Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Date extracted Reporting 01/25/00 01/25/00 01/25/00 01/25/00 01/25/00 01/25/00 Date analyzed Limits 01/25/00 01/25/00 01/25/00 01/25/00 01/25/00 01/25/00 NWTPH-Gx, mq/kg Mineral spirits/Stoddard solvent 5.0 nd nd nd nd nd Gasoline 5.0 nd nd nd nd nd BTEX,pglkq Benzene 50 nd 106% nd nd nd nd • Toluene 50 nd 121% nd ' nd nd nd Ethylbenzene 50 nd nd nd nd nd Xylenes 50 nd nd nd nd nd Surrogate recoveries: Trifluorotoluene 96% 95% 87% 96% 94% 92% Bromofluorobenzene • 104% 101% 101% 106% - 104% 104% Data Qualifiers and Analytical Comments nd-not detected at listed reporting limits na-not analyzed C-coelution with sample peaks M-matrix interference J-estimated value Results reported on dry-weight basis Acceptable Recovery limits:65%TO 135% Acceptable RPD limit:35% • • • Page 1 of 1 • TEG NW SEATTLE CHEMISTRY LABORATORY (425).957-9872,fax(425)957-9904 TEG Job Number: S00125-1 Client: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES Client Job Name: RENTON Client Job Number: JN 9319-1 Printed: 2/4/00 12:03 Analytical Results MS MSD NWTPH-Gx/BTEX MTH BLK LCS B5 GW B5 GW B5 GW Matrix Water Water Water Water Water Water Date extracted Reporting 01/25/00 01/25/00 01/25/00 01/25/00 01/25/00 Date analyzed Limits 01/25/00 01/25/00 01/25/00 01/25/00 01/25/00 NWTPH-Gx, mq/L Mineral spirits/Stoddard solvent 0.10 nd nd Gasoline 0.10 nd nd BTEX , uq/L Benzene 1.0 nd 106% nd 97% 95% Toluene 1.0 nd 121% nd 98% 99% Ethylbenzene 1.0 nd nd Xylenes 1.0 nd rid Surrogate recoveries: Trifluorotoluene 96% 95% 90% 91% 96% Bromofluorobenzene 104% 101% 100% 103% 109% Data Qualifiers and Analytical Comments nd-not detected at listed reporting limits na-not analyzed C-coelution with sample peaks M-matrix interference J-estimated value Acceptable Recovery limits:65%TO 135% Acceptable RPD limit:35% • • Page 1 of 2 TEG NW SEATTLE CHEMISTRY LABORATORY (425)957-9872,fax(425)957-9904 TEG Job Number: S00125-1 Client: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES Client Job Name: RENTON Client Job Number: JN 9319-1 Printed: 2/4/00 12:03 Analytical Results RPD NWTPH-Gx/BTEX B5 GW 86 GW B7 GW Matrix Water Water Water Water Date extracted Reporting 01/25/00 01/25/00 01/25/00 Date analyzed Limits 01/25/00 01/25/00 01/25/00 NWTPH-Gx, mq/L Mineral spirits/Stoddard solvent 0.10 ' nd nd Gasoline 0.10 nd nd BTEX,uq/L Benzene 1.0 2% nd rid Toluene 1.0 1% nd nd Ethylbenzene 1.0 nd nd Xylenes 1.0 nd rid Surrogate recoveries: Trifluorotoluene 92% 95% Bromofluarobenzene 104% 105% Data Qualifiers and Analytical Comments nd-not detected at listed reporting limits na-not analyzed C-coelution with sample peaks M-matrix interference J-estimated value Acceptable Recovery limits:65%TO 135% Acceptable RPD limit:35% Page 2 of 2 • TEG NW SEATTLE CHEMISTRY LABORATORY (425)957-9872,fax(425)957-9904 TEG Job Number: S00125-1 Client: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES Client Job Name: RENTON Client Job Number. JN 9319-1 Analytical Results DUPL NWTPH-Dx, mg/kg MTH BLK B5 @12' B6 @12' B7 @12' B7 @12' Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Date extracted Reporting 01/25/00 01/25100 01/25/00 01/25/00 01/25/00 Date analyzed Limits 01/25/00 01/25/00 01/25/00 01/25/00 01/25/00 Kerosene/Jet fuel 20 nd nd nd nd nd Diesel/Fuel oil 20 nd nd nd nd nd Heavy oil 50 nd nd nd nd nd Surrogate recoveries: Fluorobiphenyl 97% 99% 97% 96% 97% o-Terphenyl 93% 95% , 93% 91% 92% ,III Data Qualifiers and Analytical Comments nd-not detected at listed reporting limits na-not analyzed C-coelution with sample peaks M-matrix interference • J-estimated value • Results reported on dry-weight basis Acceptable Recovery limits:65%TO 135% Acceptable RPD limit:35% - I Page 1 of 1 • TEG NW SEATTLE CHEMISTRY LABORATORY (425)957-9872,fax(425)957-9904 • TEG Job Number: S00125-1 Client: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES Client Job Name: RENTON Client Job Number: JN 9319-1 Analytical Results DUPL NWTPH-Dx, mg/I MTH BLK B5 GW B6 GW B7 GW B7 GW Matrix Water Water Water Water Water Water Date extracted Reporting 01/25/00 01/25/00 01/25/00 01/25/00 01/25/00 Date analyzed Limits 01/25/00 01/25/00 01/25/00 01/25/00 01/25/00 Kerosene/Jet fuel 0.20 nd nd nd nd nd Diesel/Fuel oil 0.20 nd nd nd nd nd Heavy oil 0.50 rid nd nd nd rid Surrogate,recoveries: Fluorobiphenyl 93% 102% 101% 102% 102% o-Terphenyl 91% 99% 97% 98% 97% Data Qualifiers and Analytical Comments nd-not detected at listed reporting limits na-not analyzed C-coelution with sample peaks M-matrix interference • J-estimated value Acceptable Recovery limits:65%TO 135% Acceptable RPD limit:35% • Page 1 of 1 (� TRANSGLOBAL CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECO [ ``1- ENVIRONMENTAL �(� 0 1 Z S` I lreg a GEOSCIENCES CLIENT: ICvt✓,.ren-4.4 d ,/ a c a4-- ) 1 r< . ( GA 1) DATE: /- 25- el C) . PAGE / OF I ADDRESS: L 112--11 Z+k Av.0.44E. gR, ,E-mo i e.e l/Q yw 1 LI1/1-- 98OO PROJECT NAME; �,q. ¢/t — PHONE ( q25) 4 S5 - 9 42c FAX: 4-SS - 2 SI(o LOCATION: 75--77 6 Lk-iri e-44 Alit , 5. , rUA/il }6kL_ CLIENT PROJECT #: �IJ 3i9 ' nr DATE OF I PROJECT MANAGER: two- fC Liell COLLECTOR IA.A. te LA.." e_ - COLLECTION 2'4- 6C <v o o ti ���.. s o� <u O a d >..°c -Ly o^ c p h, T a' 4r , 4 C '- �L `1, .A A y O E — % .0- o'`\o cp ry�0 co moo. ,.� p^y oo'' `4D- ,moo\o Q0 1 4) 4" fc° Z c t. Sample P co Q• co P F� r '�` .Ze .r g�\ } C9 �Qy �� co .) c Sample Number Depth Time Type Container Type if a° J° ge 4Q - e �Q QQ' Q'L ,Z� °e' /9 Q e�� /LDNOTES I- `o z 8- • 12' 12/ 69 p S L/asJ „r. 'a L � III 6 - (' eI2 ' )2_, IoSo S it it Y , 6- 72121 Iz/ I26o 5 tI II u ./ I 8- 5 w — IOQD • wa-t Vd x x - 6.- (0 vs/ — I/1S NA/ 1 t t ■■■■■©©■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ �/, . . :; ,.ill© 8- 7 C MJ — /23D ►A/ " I t 11111111111111•111118111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111M1111 ■1111111111111111111111i11111111111111111M11111111111111111 III I 1 I 1► RELINQUISHED BY(Signature) DATE/TIME RECEIVED BY(Signature) DATE/TIME SAMPLE RECEIPT LABORATORY NOTES: /-y 1� I/Z /Oil 2 I 64,c, 2„ D�� f i TOTAL NUMBER OF CONTAINERSptQ ,� _pAV� ��R LINQUISHED BY(Si.natual E/TIME RECEIVED BY(Signature) DATE/TIME CHAIN OF CUSTODY SEALS Y/N/NA 1" SEALS INTACT?Y/N/NA lr_X Jam,r S �A A.- 1-1., i-t� SAMPLE DISPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS RECEIVED GOOD COND./COLD 645A p STEG DISPOSAL G$2.00 each 0 Return 0 Pickup NOTES: 3 .,_.. - .. .,..�,„,� „L�_`•,i. ai,•v . i •_mil_. 1'AJ. • t -f:=-; -1-.,-, 1'it.t'. I ,_�it_n_i 11.'4 ,H1'I r . r Cedar r River Terrace property \NM (residential apartments) . :?_tent high concrete wall -.. storage : ——.. approximate interpreted locality - f-• _ • lc , :"-4-> Caober Corps gffice n!19,340-gallon capacity above- - __ (73 Burnett Ave.S.) ground storage tanks f� [shedl _ s i 132 , 3. 2 R exiphirlt.crrrpeed F; Canber Corps warehouse 4B-3 Ix [former • CO . garage] 13-* tid • h ._ concrete()adds (f9r'rner•duel `•'J Canber Corps j 0" warehouse y l r. 'riser taco) �p (fanner barrel o aplatform.) fir' -- L..-_ . Cr4knee w `" F.S.Purcell a Painting,Inc. . • ,�„ warehouse a- $-� y r: ' <esp{rail swfaced ou t 4r,_ . - ce rc,". D.S.Purcell-- office(75 L-- jence Burnett Ave.S- inferred shallow groundwater flow _---Starkovich Property Northwest directions I u'ccurfticed !t6 Pneumatic c� �' Electric Repair (grin r.Usoi{) (77 Burnett Ave.S.) Londe Feed Building (95 Burnett Ave.S.) =Approximate location of Strataprobe borings by EAI on 8-27-99 NORTH $-1 (B-1 through B-4) and 1-19-2000 (B-5 through B-7). Scale: 1 inch = 40 feet _ ENVIRONMENTAL SITE EXPLORATION MAP �.` ., ASSOCIATES, INC. Commercial Property 73- 77 Burnett Avenue South —• 2722-112th..tvcnrrc N.E.,Ste.B-ioo Renton,Washington ' �,7 ._;,- -' Bellevue,Washington 98004 • ary } . _ Job Number: 1;nrT, +--A 'Loggedn�_ Flare: Mr Ale 4.•. • Cedar River Terrace property _ - (residential apartments) i 2-foot high concrete wall storage approximate interpreted locality i- s e > Canber Corps office of 19,340-gallon capacity above- (73 Burnett Ave.S.) ground storage tanks 1 ,shed! $-1 B-2 • asphalt surfaced i rt 1 Canber Corps • warehouse B 3 A. • [former garage] r _i B-4 td Ps -$ com Crete l ads 'CS Canber Corps (f rmer el p warehouse a I dtsp user ea) [former barrel o i 44� y • latform x p ] 11 ► fence U/a4 D.S.Purcell o Painting,Inc. ao +B-6 y warehouse o <° x n CO asphalt surfaced O s m B-74, FBI t =-- D.S.Purcell office(75 __. . .........._.________fence Bumett Ave.SI:- - . ' k inferredsltallow i r �'`\\ —_ groundwater flow } Starkovich Property Northwest direction Pneumatic& B-5 unsurfaced Electric Repair l )Y (gravel/soil) m'el/soil) (77 Burnett Ave.S.) Lande Feed Building 1 (95 Burnett Ave.S.) I NORTH =Approximate location of Strataprobe borings by EAI on 8-27-99 B-1 (B-1 through B-4) and 1-19-2000 (B-5 through B-7). Scale: I inch _ 40 feet + ENVIRONMENTAL SITE EXPLORATION MAP -' ASSOCIATES, INC. Commercial Property 73-77-Burnett Avenue South . ., ,r -' — • 2122-112th Avenue N.E.,Ste.B-100 1Renton,Washington Bellevue,Washington 98004 Job Number: Date: Logged by: Plate: JN 9319-1 Feb.2000 2 • Cedar River Terrace property (residential apartments) 2-foot high concrete wall storage . ): Canber Corps office approximate interpreted locality _ —I s,el '� — of 19,340-gallon capacity above- ► (73 Burnett Ave.S.) ground storage tanks shed P B-i B-2I' asphalt surfaced ,, , fo Canber Corps warehouse -3 120 [former 1"1. garage] I B-4CO P CD co rete pads Pt- ° w rmer uel CS Canber Corps ' (f disp nser rea) : p warehouse al [former barrel o ` platform] n- _ np ; . T -- D.S.Purcell a4 Painting,Inc. *B-6 warehouse o co 0 fo O asphalt surfaced ` y may( I , 7 e p, D.S.Purcell office Purcell fence 75 I Burnett Ave.S. inferred shallow groundwater flow Starkovich Property Northwest direction Pneumatic& 4,0]3_5 unsurfaced (gravel/soil) Electric Repair M (77 Burnett Ave.S.) ':: [ Lande Feed Building 1 (95 Burnett Ave.S.) NORTH =Approximate location of Strataprobe borings by EAT on 8-27-99 B-1 (B-1 through B-4) and 1-19-2000 (B-5 through B-7). Scale: 1 inch =40 feet 4- ENVIRONMENTAL SITE EXPLORATION MAP -` , ASSOCIATES, INC. Commercial Property 73-77 Burnett Avenue South .. — _,t! _ 2122-112th Avenue N.E.,Ste.B-100 Renton,Washington \ ,._�� Bellevue,Washington 98004 .34406 Job Number: Date: Logged by: Plate: JN 9319-1 Feb.2000 2 ' s . Cedar River Terrace property • (residential apartments) 2-foot high concrete wall storage ,'�� approximate interpreted locality-- — se- . >2 1 Canber Corps office of 19,340-gallon capacity above- I(73 Burnett Ave.S.) ground storage tanks ; - shed �B-1 L -- .._. B-2 o ' �1 asphalt surfaced o m Canber Corps warehouse *3-3 Po i [former P': i gage] lv B-4 CO co Crete ads ''CI Canber Corps a (1 rmer rel p warehouse w disp user ea) • [former barrel o { platform] `�' _ C cro fence wD.S.Purcell a4 t- Painting,Inc. , ',Is warehouse CL o B-6 ti m; m "s m• • CA i O asphalt surfaced al • �I 0 B- I F+�I D.S.Purcell office(75 t 1: fence .Burnett Ave.S. inferred shallow I --�_ groundwater flow `—Starkovich Property direction Northwest4, unsurfaced Pneumatic& B-5 (gravel/soil) Electric Repair (77 Bumett Ave.S.) Lande Feed Building I (95 Burnett Ave.S.) =Approximate location of Strataprobe borings by EAI on 8-27-99 NORTH B-i (B-1 through B-4) and 1-19-2000 (B-5 through B-7). Scale: 1 inch =40 feet ENVIRONMENTAL SITE EXPLORATION MAP ASSOCIATES, INC."� '� ' Commercial Property • i " 73-77 Burnett Avenue South - -' • 2122-112th Avenue N.E.,Ste.B-10oRenton,Washington __� Bellevue,Washington 98004 Job Number: Date: Logged by: Plate: • JN 9319-1 Feb.2000 2. • . l• . • BORING B-5 Sample VOC Interval/ Temporary Approximate Head-space number Well Water Table USCS DESCRIPTION Analysis(ppm) 0 N. Suface:asphalt. FLFILL:Sand with silt,brown,fine-to-medium grained,moist ,: B-5 --- •.it .,�'i 0 @ •2' an Silty sand/sandy silt,fine,brown,roots present,moist. B-5 c 5' rL - i • • - . B-5 fr r . Alternating layers of fine brown silty sand and fine brown sandy silt,moist. B5 • @8' 0 • • soil turns gray colored 10' r�io 0 I- B-5 - r@ 12' - • • .• Sand becomes fine-to-medium grained,gray,very moist. 0 r` - �: 'B- S y r@ Gravelly sand,wet,medium-to-coarse grained,gray. 0 15'_._ —. —.. ii * Strataprobe boring terminated at 15.0 feet on 1-24-2000. * Groundwater encountered at approximately 12 feet below the ground surface. * HC headspace analysis measured using Photovac PID volatile organic compound vapor monitor. ENVIRONMENTAL STRATAPROBE BORING LOG ASSOCIATES, INC. Commercial Property • 75-77 Burnett Avenue South — —�-•• - 2122-112th Avenue N.E.,Ste.B-100 Renton,Washington ;-y•_.,� Bellevue,Washington 98004 Job Number: Date Logged by: Plate: JN 9319-1 Jan.2000 JRR 3 . BORING B-6 Sample VOC Interval/ Temporary Approximate Head-space number Well Water Table uses DESCRIPTION Analysis(ppm) 0 ? Suface:asphalt. i k� FL FILL:Sand with silt,brown-to-gray,fine-to-medium grained,moist. @2' 0 Silty sand/sandy silt,fine,brown,moist. B-6 0 ©4' 'tia o 5' B-6 g@6' o _ .' Alternating layers of fine brown silty sand and fine brown sandy silt,moist. B-6 0 @8' , . ' soil turns gray colored 1.0'- B-6 @10' • • 0 B6 lir @ 12' ` 6 • . Sand becomes fine-to-medium grained,gray,very moist. 0 ■ 1 -_ o U � B-6 -SW;.. Gravelly sand,wet,medium-to-coarse grained,gray. 0 @14' 113 15' — - - * Strataprobe boring terminated at 15.0 feet on 1-24-2000. * Groundwater encountered at approximately 12 feet below the ground surface. * HC headspace analysis measured using Photovac PID volatile organic compound vapor monitor. } ENVIRONMENTAL STRATAPROBE BORING LOG ASSOCIATES, INC. Commercial Property 75-77 Burnett Avenue South j — —.4`• -• 2122-112th Avenue N.E.,Ste.B-100 Renton,Washington -,c-.. Bellevue,Washington 98004 Job Number: Date: Logged by: Plate: JN 9319-1 Jan.2000 JRR 4 9 ' BORING B-7 Sample VOC Interval/ Temporary Approximate Head-space number Well Water Table USCS DESCRIPTION Analysis(ppm) Suface:asphalt. FLFILL:Sand with silt,brown,fine-to-medium grained,moist. B-7 2 ou - 0 • _ • Silty sand/sandy silt,fine,brown,roots present,moist. B-7 p f:•• ;` on 04' 4' 0 5' • B-7 •@6' ► 0 :I . .' Alternating layers of fine brown silty sand and fine brown sandy silt,moist. iB-7 • I. . I . soil turns gray colored 10' B-7 - @l0 0 B-7 •' ' il r' l2 = `. Sand becomes Erne-to-medium grained,some silt present,gray,very moist. 0 to B-7 S).11V 14' ;, Gravelly sand with silt,wet,medium-to-coarse grained,gray. 0 15' — •3 •�. � * Strataprobe boring tenninated at 15.0 feet on 1-24-2000. * Groundwater encountered at approximately 12 feet below the ground surface. * HC headspace analysis measured using Photovac PID volatile organic compound vapor monitor. 4. ENVIRONMENTAL STRATAPROBE BORING LOG ` ASSOCIATES, INC. Commercial Property _ 75 -77 Burnett Avenue South '�' a • 2122-112th Avenue N.G.,Ste.I-100 Renton,Washington Bellevue,Washington 98004 Job Number: Date: Logged by: Plate: JN 9319-1 .Tan.2000 JRR 5 > jfi f"Sr • C UBSUR�FA�CE�•S�IVI LIN;: rA,& , T a. . • EST:I`• • Commercial Property 75 - 77 Burnett Avenue South Renton, Washington Prepared for: Ms. Bev Starkovich 810 North Riverside Drive Renton, Washington 98055 Questions regarding this investigation, the conclusions reached and the recommendations given should be addressed to one of the following undersigned. James /`&JJ—fr— uef Environmental Geologist Registered Site Assessor/Licensed UST Supervisor State Certification#1059469-26 (11---L* Don W. Spencer, Sc., P.G., R.E.A. Principal Registered Site Assessor/Licensed UST Supervisor State Certification#947458636 License: W000010 (Washington) License: 11464 (Oregon) License: 876 (California) License: 5195 (Illinois) License: 0327 (Mississippi) • Reference Job Number: JN 9319-1 February 10, 2000 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. 'TA-BLfE 'OF- 'CONTENTS INTRODUCTION/SCOPE OF WORK 5 Site/Project Description 5 FINDINGS 6 Subsurface Investigation 6 Laboratory Analysis 8 CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS 11 LIMITATIONS 12 PLATES Plate 1 - Vicinity Map Plate 2 - Site Exploration Map Plate 3 - Boring Log B-5 Plate 4 - Boring Log B-6 Plate 5 - Boring Log B-7 APPENDIX Laboratory Report ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. ' r . • Ms. Bev Starkovich '. JN 9319-1 February 10, 2000 Page - 5 A. INT : OO U = TIO �, �1. A lSCOSP Q SITE/PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Starkovich property includes a rectangular-shaped parcel covering approximately 30,000 square feet of land. Improvements to the property include several office, shed, and warehouse structures. The northern portion of the subject site is currently occupied by Canber Corps (general contractors for remodeling,painting, landscaping, etc.), and the southern portion is currently occupied by D.S. Purcell Painting, Inc. and Northwest Pneumatic & Electric Repair. The focus of this current study is on the southern portion of the Starkovich property. The property is located in a mixed commercial and residential area just north of the downtown core of Renton,Washington.Surrounding properties include a residential apartment complex to the north (Cedar River Terrace),Burnett Avenue South to the east,across which lies a Salvation Army facility, a grass lawn area to the west, with Walt's Muffler Service further to the west, and Lande Feed situated to the south of the site. The approximate location of the site is shown on the Vicinity Map, Plate 1, appended herewith. A previous use of the subject site prior to the early-to-mid 1960's included a bulk petroleum distribution facility, with three approximately 19,000-gallon capacity above-ground storage tanks used for gasoline and kerosene storage (and perhaps diesel fuel storage as well). The tanks were reportedly located on the northern-most portion of the subject site (please refer to Plate 2, Site Exploration Map, for the approximate interpreted locality of the former tanks, as well as other site improvements), and an associated fuel dispenser area was located along the east-central portion of the site. Other structures were reportedly used as a garage, a barrel platform, and as warehouse and office space. Previous Work In September of 1999, EAI completed a preliminary investigation of subsurface conditions at four (4) localities on the northern portion of the Starkovich property addressed as 73 Burnette Avenue South.The purpose of that study was to explore subsurface conditions of the subject site at localities formerly occupied by above-ground tanks,fuel dispensers,and petroleum product piping associated with the former on-site bulk fuel distribution facility in an effort to evaluate the potential for impacts (if any) from petroleum contaminants. Results of that study revealed concentrations of gasoline, kerosene, and diesel range petroleum hydrocarbons in soil at levels exceeding the Washington Department of Ecology (WDOE) Method A cleanup levels for these contaminants in soil. Trace concentrations (below the.current WDOE Method A cleanup levels) of gasoline range petroleum hydrocarbons were also discovered in groundwater at three of the exploration localities, with the only contaminant exceeding the WDOE groundwater cleanup level being benzene in groundwater at one locality. Acknowledging the previous study sampling observations and testing results, it ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Ms. Bev Starkovich JN 9319-1 February 10, 2000 Page - 6 appeared that,at the localities explored,environmental impacts to the site from the former bulk fuel facility were largely confined to relatively shallow soils (approximately upper 12 to 13 feet.of the site or less). Current Study Your expressed current interests,which included the desire to conduct a preliminary evaluation of subsurface conditions on the southern portions of the Starkovich property(addressed as 75 and 77 Burnett Avenue South) to assess the potential for the presence of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants (presented in our proposal to you dated January 20, 2000), formed the basis for the following scope of work: • Completing three (3) Strataprobe borings with a truck-mounted unit, along with soil and groundwater sampling, at localities on the subject site south of the former bulk fuel facility on property formerly occupied by Standard Oil(addressed as 75 Burnett Avenue South), as well as on property further to the south (addressed as 77 Burnett Avenue South); • Laboratory analysis of selected soil samples and groundwater samples using gas chromatography by WDOE method NWTPH-Gas/BTEX for the presence of gasoline-range petroleum hydrocarbons and associated BTEX constituents, and by WDOE method NWTPH-Dx (diesel extended) for petroleum hydrocarbons in the kerosene, diesel, and heavy-oil ranges; • Preparation of this summary report documenting the methodology and results of the investigation. . ......... .: ...fit .. 5x.: ....a... e, FINDINGS' SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION Strataprobe Boring and Soil Sampling Three (3) Strataprobe borings were made on January 19, 2000 at the approximate locations noted as B-5 through B-7 on the Site Exploration Map, Plate 2. The localities of EAI's earlier, August 1999 Strataprobe explorations (designated as B-1 through B-4) are also depicted on the Site Exploration Map.Some limitations in terms of access for probing were imposed by on-site buildings and equipment.The configuration of the former on-site bulk petroleum fuel distribution facility was interpreted based upon review of historical Sanbom Fire Insurance Maps and other maps provided by the property owner. A truck-mounted direct-push hydraulic and percussion drive-point unit equipped with 2-inch outer diameter hollow-stem stainless steel sampling equipment(Strataprobe) was employed to complete the borings. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. • Ms. Bev Starkovich JN 9319-1 February 10, 2000 Page - 7 Under the supervision of our staff geologist,the Strataprobe unit was brought into position over each selected exploration location,blocked up,and leveled before advancing each boring.Following set- up preparations, the boring/sampling technique consisted of hydraulically advancing a three foot length split-spoon sampler with a plastic sample sleeve into the ground.The sampler and sleeve was then withdrawn and opened for examination and transfer of the soil sample to laboratory prepared glassware. The sampling process was then repeated(continuously sampled in three-foot intervals) with a clean, sterilized sampler and sleeve until the desired maximum depth was achieved(15 feet below the ground surface at each locality). Samples were transferred from the sampler directly to sterilized glassware with teflon-lined lids furnished by the project laboratory. Samples were stored in an iced chest at the site and taken to the laboratory in this condition in an effort to preserve sample integrity.Each jar was clearly labeled as to boring and sample number/depth,date,time,project,etc.EPA-recommended sample-management protocol, including maintenance of chain of custody documentation was observed at each stage of the project. During drilling, a field log was made by the project geologist for each boring. Information recorded versus corresponding depth included soil classification (Unified Soil Classification System), color, texture, apparent moisture content, odors (if present), etc. A small portion of each soil sample was subjected to "field screening" for volatile organic vapors using a portable organic vapor detector instrument (Photovac PID). The screening technique consisted of placing a small portion of each soil sample into a sealed jar and leaving the sample for a period of several minutes to allow volatile organic compounds (such as gasoline and associated BTEX constituents,kerosene,and diesel fuel)which might be contained within each soil sample to vaporize.A small probe attached to the detection instrument was then inserted into the"headspace" within each jar via a small access port in the jar lid,and a measurement of the volatile organic vapors (if any were present) was made. Field screening measurements were performed on selected soil samples taken during the course of the probing program. No volatile organic vapors were detected during field headspace testing.The results of the headspace measurements are included in the boring logs appended to this report as Plates 3 through 5. Subsurface Conditions Soil types encountered during probing were generally similar from boring-to-boring,and consisted of 1.5 to 2 feet ofbrown,moist,silty sand fill material.These shallow fill soils were found to overlie alternating layers of moist, gray to brown, fine-grained silty sand and sandy silt to a depth of approximately 12 feet below the ground surface,below which soils consisted of very moist-to-wet, fine-to-medium grained sand, grading to wet, gravelly sand to the maximum depth explored of 15 feet below the ground surface. Groundwater was encountered at approximately 12 feet below the ground surface at each boring locality.Please refer to the boring logs attached to this report as Plates 3 through 5 for a description of specific subsurface conditions encountered at each boring location. No petroleum odors were noted emanating from any of the soils sampled from the three Strataprobe borings.As previously discussed,please refer to the boring logs for results of volatile organic vapors detected during headspace measurements completed on selected soil samples using a Photovac photo-ionization detector(PID). ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. . . (----i cz _i .t.,t .'7- ' *.'2 3 -'.. -01-N-02-\ u tt G E O T E C H. �,,�,L ;Jr �3 May 28, 1999 1 CONSULTANTS, INC_ JN 99132E 13256 NE 20th Street.Suite 16 Bcll:Vue.WA 98005 - (425)747-5618 pmr , 1 FAX(425►747-8561 )- I-Wr�AINVG° Lande Feed Company J; 12 2 001 l 95 Burnett Avenue South Renton, Washington 98056 f;. P 1 Attention: Craig Lande Subject: Underground Storage Tank Location and Soil Sampling -' Lande Feed Company Site 95 Burnett Avenue South Renton, Washington Dear Mr. Lande: 1 We are pleased to present this report for the Lande Feed Company site in Renton, Washington. You authorized our work by accepting our proposal, P-4849, dated March 22, 1999. Our methodologies, findings, and conclusions are summarized in this report. i SCOPE OF WORK IThe scope of work for this project included: (1) coordination with an underground storage tank locating firm to better define the location of an underground storage tank (UST) identified by Mr. Lande adjacent to the southeastern corner of the building; (2) attempting to locate an underground storage tank, reportedly in the fenced area south'of the former boiler room; (3) laboratory analysis of soil samples collected during our geotechnical phase of site exploration; and (4) preparation of this brief summary report. METHODOLOGY :f Underground Storage Tank Location Procedures iAn electro-magnetic (EM) device was used to identify buried metal targets. The EM device transmits and receives an electro-magnetic signal. The EM signal is transmitted through the ground, which in turn radiates a signal that is dependent upon the ground conductivity and which is received at the receiver. The two signals, the transmitted and ground response EM waves, are balanced (nulled) for zero response in the instrument electronics. When the ground conditions t change, for example, when the transmitted signal encounters buried metal, the ground conductivity changes, the balance or null point is changed, rand the instrument responds with an audible signal. Depending upon the size of the metal object, the EM waves can penetrate to a depth of up to 15 feet. Copies of the field reports for this project are attached to the report as Appendix A. I i;' I p 0,„\ JN 99132E Lande Feed Company --` ' ° • Page 2 May 28, 1998 1 Drilling and Soil Sampling Procedures To assess the geotechnical as well as environmental condition of the soil near the two underground storage tanks, we drilled borings B-1 and B-3. To further assess the geotechnical properties of the soil at the subject property, we drilled borings B-2 and B-4. The Site Exploration Map, Plate 2, 1 illustrates the boring locations. The borings were drilled on April 23, 1999, using a trailer-mounted, hollow-stem auger drill for 1 borings B-1 and B-2, and a portable hollow-stem auger drill for borings B-3 and B-4. We completed boring B-1 to a depth of 29 feet below ground surface (bgs). Boring B-2 was drilled to a depth of 16.5 feet bgs, boring B-3 to a depth of 26 feet and boring B-4 to a depth of 12 feet bgs. Soil samples were taken from all of the borings. The Test Boring Logs are attached as Plates 3 i through 6. Samples were taken at 5-foot intervals with a standard penetration sampler. This split- spoon sampler, which has a 2-inch outside diameter, is driven into the soil with a 140-pound 1 hammer falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to advance the sampler a given distance is an indication of the soil density or consistency. After the sampler was withdrawn, each sample was transferred to a sterilized glass jar with a Teflon-sealed lid furnished by the project laboratory. I The sampler was washed between samples with sodium triphosphate solution and then rinsed. The sampler and the augers were steam-cleaned between borings to avoid the possibility of cross- contamination. IThe soil samples were stored in an iced chest at, or below, 4 degrees centigrade at the site and taken to the laboratory in the chest. Each jar was labeled as to boring number, sample depth, and I field personnel. EPA-recommended sample management protocol, including the maintenance of chain-of-custody documentation, was observed at each stage of the project. I During drilling, a field log was made by the project geologist for each boring. Information recorded verses the corresponding depth included soil classification (Unified Soil Classification System), color, texture, moisture, seepage zones, odors, and iridescent sheens. A portion of each soil I sample was subjected to headspace analysis using a Photovac 2020 Photoionization Device (PID) to assess potential organic vapor concentrations in soil Laboratory Analyses I Transglobal Environmental Geosciences of Lacey, Washington conducted soil sample analyses. Copies of the complete laboratory reports, including the chain-of-custody documentation for samples analyzed for this project, are attached to the report as Appendix B. 1 Soil samples were selected for laboratory analysis based upon field measurements of organic vapors in the head-space of a contained, presence of wet soil conditions, or changes in stratigraphy (layering). Gasoline was reportedly stored in the underground storage tank located I near the southeastern corner of the property and heating fuel was reportedly stored in the underground storage tank located on the west side of the building. A soil sample obtained from boring B-1 was analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) by Washington Method NWTPH- G/BTEX for gasoline-range hydrocarbons along with benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and xylenes (BTEX). The detection limit for.gasoline-range hydrocarbons as applied to this method is 5 parts 1 per million (ppm) for soil. The lower detection limits for BTEX by this method are 0.05 ppm in soil. A soil sample from boring B-3 was analyzed for diesel- and oil-range analysis using method . ,�,,,, .�„ Lande Feed Company JN 99132EPage 3 May 28, 1998 NWTPH-Dx. The lower detection limits for this method are 20 ppm for diesel-range hydrocarbons and 50 ppm for oil-range hydrocarbons in soil. This analytical approach provides a basis for comparing the site environment to existing standards offered in the MTCA regulations, Chapter 173-340, Washington Administrative Code. FINDINGS Surface The site is a relatively large, rectangular-shaped parcel situated on the northern portion of downtown Renton. The provided lot map indicates that the property consists of one lot. Burnett Avenue South and a City of Renton park abut the eastern and western sides of the property, respectively. Commercial buildings adjoin the southern and northern boundaries of the site. The ground surface on the subject property is relatively flat. At the time of our explorations, the majority of the site was covered with the Lande Feed Mill building, asphalt, or concrete. A narrow, rectangular piece of the property along the western property boundary was vegetated with brambles and low-growing vegetation. A chain-link fence separated the site from the adjoining City of Renton park. Existing development near the site is a combination of commercial and residential. A house and masonry garage adjoin the southeastern one-half of the site. The garage is built immediately adjacent to the Lande Feed building. The western one-half of the adjoining southern property is a commercial garage, within several feet of the southern boundary. South of this are older residential and commercial buildings. Within several feet of the northern boundary of the western one-third of the site is a commercial building that contains Northwest Pneumatic. I-, Electromaqnetic Device Survey On April 5, 1999, Ken Stoffel of Oil Tank Locating Service conducted an EM assessment of the two areas mentioned by Craig Lande as likely locations for the underground storage tanks. One UST is located near the southeastern corner of the feed store building. Field-measurements indicate that its capacity is approximate 550 gallons. It appeared that the tank was full of water with a trace of gasoline. The second tank was not located in the fenced area immediately west of the building as Mr. Lande originally thought; it is located approximately 14 feet west of the former furnace room. Field measurements indicate that the tank is approximately 3 feet in diameter and about 50 feet long, with a capacity of approximately 2,644 gallons. The tank is about 28 inches below the ground surface. Approximately 1 inch of diesel fuel and a trace of water remain in the tank. The approximate locations of the USTs are shown on the Site Exploration Plan, Plate 2. Copies of the field reports from Oil Tank Locating Service are attached to the report as Appendix A. I Subsurface The subsurface conditions were explored by drilling four test borings at the approximate locations shown on the Site Exploration Plan, Plate 2. The field exploration program was based upon our experience with similar projects in the area, the site topography and access, the subsurface conditions revealed during drilling, and on the scope of work outlined in our proposal. Lande Feed Company ;' JN 99132E 1. May 28, 1998 Page 4 The four borings encountered 7 to approximately 25 feet of loose, sandy silt and silty sand below the surface cover of concrete, asphalt, or topsoil. These upper soils appear to be a combination of ] fill and alluvium (river deposits). The geologic maps for Renton indicate that much of the area in the site vicinity has been modified by past grading activities. River channels have meandered through various portions of Renton since the last glaciers receded. Beneath the alluvium and fill, 1 - the borings found dense to very dense gravel containing varying amounts of sand and silt. These gravels were revealed to the bottom of the borings. 1 The final logs represent our interpretations of the field logs. The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types at the exploration locations. The actual transition between soil types may be gradual, and subsurface conditions can vary between boring ] locations. The logs provide specific subsurface information only at the locations tested. The relative densities and moisture descriptions indicated on the test boring logs are interpretive descriptions based on the conditions observed during drilling. INo visual or olfactory evidence of a release was noted in the soil from any of the borings. Organic vapors were screened using a Photovac 2020 Photoionization Device (PID). IGroundwater I Groundwater seepage was observed in borings B-1 and B-3 at a depth of 10 and 7 feet, respectively. No groundwater was noted in either borings B-2 or B-4. The test borings were left open for only a short time period. Therefore, the seepage levels on the logs I represent the location of transient water seepage and may not indicate the static groundwater level. It should be noted that groundwater levels vary seasonally with rainfall and other factors. I Results of Laboratory Analysis IThe results of the laboratory analyses of the selected soil samples are provided in Table A. Laboratory reports documenting the analyses have also been appended. The Method A Cleanup I levels are provided in the last row of the table. y TABLE A I SOIL WTPH-Gx/BTEX &WTPH-Dx LABORATORY RESULTS1'2 =Sample:Location t, Gasoline ..Benzene:• :,Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes. - Diese l • ';.,Oil }` :Depth .. Boring B-1 /10 feet ND' ND ND ND ND NT4 NT I Boring B-2/6 feet NT NT NT NT NT ND ND MICA Method AS 100 0.5 40.0 20.0 20.0 200 200 Notes: 1. All results are reported in parts per million(ppm). I2. Detection limits are given in the Methodology section under the Laboratory Analysis heading. 3. ND denotes not detected above applicable method detection limit. - 4. NT denotes not tested. 5. Method A Cleanup Levels—Soil,Model Toxics Control Act(MICA),WAC 173-340-740. I , ' . JN 99132E Lande Feed Company �- Page 5 May 28, 1998 As presented in the above table, no diesel- and oil-range hydrocarbons were identified in samples analyzed from selected samples from boring B-1 or B-2. j CONCLUSIONS As depicted on the field notes in Appendix A, it appears that the UST west of the Lande Feed Building may not be located on the subject property. A survey would be required to confirm the property boundaries relative to the position of the tank. Based upon the limited sampling and analysis completed at this time, it does not appear that the subsurface near the two boring locations has been affected by the underground storage tanks at the Lande Feed site. It is our opinion that no additional investigation on the site would be required at this time. RECOMMENDATIONS It is our understanding that the property may be redeveloped in the near future. Permanent closure of the gasoline storage tank will have to be conducted in accordance with the Underground Storage Tank Regulations Chapter 173-360-385, which includes sampling and analysis of the soil when the gasoline UST is removed. Although not indicated by the results of soil sampling near the gasoline UST, it may be prudent to develop a contingency plan dealing with additional costs in the event that limited soil contamination is discovered at the time of tank removal. Contaminated soils (if present) should be properly disposed of in accordance with local, state, and federal regulations. We further recommend you contact an environmental attorney regarding the possibility that the UST on the west side of the building is not located on your property, and the need for additional sampling and analysis of soils closer to the tank. LIMITATIONS This report has been prepared for specific application to this project in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill normally exercised by members of the environmental science profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the area, and in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in our proposal dated March 22, 1999. This report is for the exclusive use of Lande Feed Company and its representatives, for specific application to this site. No warranty is expressed or implied. If new information is developed in future site work, which may include excavations, borings, or studies, Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be allowed to re-evaluate the conclusions of this report and provide amendments as required. • The following documents are attached to complete this report: 3 Plate 1 Vicinity Map Plate 2 Site Exploration Plan Plates 3 - 6 Test Boring Logs Appendix A Oil Tank Locating Service Field Notes Appendix B Laboratory Results , `, Lande Feed Company JN 99132EPage 6 May 28, 1998 We appreciate the opportunity to provide environmental consulting services on this project. If you - have any questions, or if we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us. J • 1 Respectfully submitted, • GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. //j,,,,e,-,e , d4L Timothy A. Johnson ,1 WDOE-Registered Site Assessor o WAS114 t�,L: �� ,�, IGNAL SSG 5A2/97 I EXPIRES 8 117 I Q' I James R. Finley, P.E. IPrincipal TAJ/JRF:alt d I • I I I I \\ 4 c./.. ..) , .//- - a/ I I '' )ff:" , ii .tl .-1.-. t• :.:•:-:-:-:•:•:•:•:•:-:-:-'•:.:-: ; '. a : 5/ I c-. 1 '` • Er TOW,. " --'----., 11 ::,. • AR ORrt ` i i a 1 I / w , • t '^ ' I \ 1 I - II I " BM ..: i . Lam. _1 ' . . , :_-,.,��r, .'iii_ ! ;7 , . ,i .\ —i. ,;, .,:i ,� thletic �% i 1 la / • I , .'� is � , } .; {/• ' Z.. •1. 1-.� /'•,rig ,♦ ; J., . ;a'�`� ) _ .L. limin Ni\\N 0 i ...y. ..e , -- {K $ SUBJECT \ . : • 'o�•�, , �' •'� l ' � �� �„ Park '' • /l - .. 6 2• 4 .,44r.„` tar o. •. I A,;:is. .1",-,:,:„.____ ... ... .• •• • •.. .. •• ( • ii Ei . i .. .• ••,.... . •„ . s s 1 s. v, i 1 1 II- ,,,,,...,•_. _ "_:;:::. C . ..• --" dam. .L . 1 II •11 Sc P` + /', ----.7r , i ' \ ---,.__x :: - )j i. r . ••••••• : k ,!.....::::'..:`.... • ‘;‘., -'1, ;:::'•;'•:;.: 1 _. .0.,:•n;--- I el 111 i 7 (I: "..:, •-7 ii. ... -. `.9 : _ ,— -----:--__—%--1\11'i------..iit 5i.: f7.j • �i J-14 �ii I . _.._,.._. •.__••, . .•• LEGEND: ' CONTOUR INTERVAL:25 FEET SCALE:1"=1,000' I-. (SOURCE:USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OF THE RENTON QUADRANGLE,WA. 1949,PHOTOREVISED 1908&1973) F • VICINITY MAP I 44 G E OT E C H 95 Burnett Avenue South ~` CONSULTANTS, INC. Renton, Washington i Job No: Date: I Plate: 1 99132 May1999 P. -}'j c„i,•' Western Pneumatic �� --�. fi'.:j•yJ 77 Burnett Avenue South ,� f may}./.'! '' .t. _•....... '.. '..07:71,-,, 44 =0 fN.!»:fir..^ -7 7;.x ,, y 7 ,,, O fi � � a'.. 12 ,Mi d r';. .• ;,„.....: .:1:' 1 i• L03 • i'v-i 1 .V4; :::::.::. .::.::::.:::: .... . O as ... 1?;. i R a� Q �--- 3 ''rid ` • •i'.Y??�'j� %..".'^^�v,�+}•��;-q.r% .• ::�• Y fu to o ie'v .;u -7104 ' i' is 73 C H.,.::..:.Hill 1 tt.4.7. .co °°_ t: t• I l,.":i" �, trw'r ;-. :. . iI=S"•.•::t m '.....•.:•�.. Masonry Building :r;.y'.y' (garage) M „, y� 101 Burnett Ave.S. To I d iki :144 Garage r • ° �;;r", Burr►ett Place S. House a i u. -a): li . 03 Burnett Ave.S cc t u.. LEGEND: _ I ISB1 Approximate Location of Boring Made by Geotech Consultants,Inc.April 1999 s. Trees,grass,or brambles Approximate property line Concrete or Asphalt • - Approximate Location of UST.Please Refer to Appendix A for Detailed Measurements NOT TO SCALE . SITE EXPLORATION PLAN I G E O T E C H 95 Burnett Avenue South CONSULTANTS, INC. Renton, Washington . . ' Plate: I _ Job No: I Mayi 9ss T 99132 I.': ...., BORING 1 Headspace 5 0 N• s'•• �a`N3 4?) Q��4 o-fiQ`e 5G Description Analysis 1 VQ ,Sc'' , 5 J L FILL Asphalt over brown SAND with fine gravel, moist, loose (FILL) 1 2 1 n i I i 'l l Brown to gray. sandy SILT, moist, soft 00 ppm U ML 5 1 , ; ,11 00 ppm I — 4 2 I I I -becomes more sandy 7 IHI "' 13 3 '! j Sp Brown SAND, slightly oxidized, with trace of silt, fine-to 00 ppm I ;rrrr n medium-grained, moist, medium dense 00 ppm 10 -- 23 4 1 ! Brown, gravelly, SAND, fine-to coarse-grained,wet, medium dense '- i i SW i 15 20 00 ppm 5 E - becomes more gravelly ! , I - II(1 _II 00 ppm 20 `-- 11 6 u '1 ML I Grayish-brown SILT with fine sand, wet, stiff : I1I I 1 25 — l? 21 7 � 'will,, Brown, silty GRAVEL with sand, fine-to coarse-grained, wet, 00 ppm . medium-dense 41 8 r' _ - becomes dense 00 ppm I 30 — I r — * Test boring was terminated at 29 feet during drilling on April 23, 1999. * Groundwater seepage was encountered during drilling at 10 feet. X No visual or olfactory indications of contamination in soil. 35 "' * Headspace measured in a sealed plastic container using a Photovac 2020 Photoionization Device(PID). 40— BORING LOG GEOTECH14 95 Burnett Avenue South `` CONSULTANTS, INC. Renton, Washington Job No: 1 Date: Logged b�: ' Plate- 99132 I May 1999 I TA! 3 a ec e40°` `e BORING 2 Headspace Li4e.5�0�4o,vq,.9,A / 45GG Description Analysis L. FILL 2" asphalt over 6"concrete over brown, silty SAND with some gravel, damp, loose (FILL) 5 `' Brown SILT with sand and gravel, moist, soft 4 1 ill�li� J • - •• • Brown, sandy GRAVEL to gravelly SAND, moist, dense ' GP . r — . . OOppm • 0 — 23 2 • •- •. • No sample UU ppm • •• • • • • '• '• ' • Brown, sandy GRAVEL with trace of silt,fine-to coarse- 15h— 58 3 ,. G ' grained, moist, very dense DO ppm * Test boring was terminated at 16.5 feet during drilling on April 23, 1999. 20 * No groundwater seepage was encountered during drilling. * No visual or olfactory indications of contamination in soil. * Headspace measured in a sealed plastic container using a Photovac 2020 Photoionization Device(PID). — 25 -- 30 — • 35 — i — 40— . 1 k ..1 BORING LOG GEOTECH 95Burnett Avenue South I CONSULTANTS, INC. B Renton, Washington Job No: Date: Logged by: Plate: Y 99l32 May 1999 T a I I. y N. BORING 3 r `� °i 4 `11 S Headspace .1V1 %�o-Nzi. • t Se' �5G Description Analysis VI' • Brown organic topsoil over SM Brown, silty SAND, fine-grained, trace of organics, moist, J 4 1 loose 00 ppm 5 ' ML • Brownish gray with orange mottling, SILT with sand, very 1 . I : moist, soft SM f Gray, silty SAND, fine-grained,wet, very loose 00 ppm ~ 5 3 .: SP -becomes less silty 00 ppm 10 ILrA IL I 10 4 I Gray, sandy SILT with organic layers, occasional gravel, wet, 00 ppm i 11111 stiff il' 15 — 8 5 I Brown SAND with trace of silt, fine-to medium-grained, wet, 00 ppm SP i loose _ i ' 20 - becomes gray 5 6I I' I I Gray, sandy SILT with thin organic layers, wet, loose 00 ppm ML - becomes hard 25 — 50/6" 7 El I Gray, sandy GRAVEL with trace of silt, wet, very dense 00 ppm I : • *-Test boring was terminated at 26 feet during drilling on April 23, 1999. 30 — * Groundwater seepage was encountered during drilling at 6 feet. * No visual or olfactory indications of contamination in soil. * Headspace measured in a sealed plastic container using a Photovac 2020 1 Photoionization Device(PID). 3 35 ! ,--- 140— • I ' BORING LOG I , `iN G E O T E C H CONSULTANTS, INC. 95 Burnett Avenue South '�' Renton, Washington Job No: Date: Logged by: Plate: 99!32 May 1999 TAI 5 7 '..' N. BORING 4 Nec �y 40° `� `- Headspace44�y.���10o-,o\Pg>° 42, S°�4 JSG, Description Analysis Brown, fine sand (Top Soil) over FILL brown to orange, silty SAND with gravel, moist, loose (FILL) I Ii�L ! Brown SILT to silty SAND, with some gravel, moist, loose 5 �'_ 31 2 3 1 II 00 ppm -becomes gravelly 10 r �-- IL Brown, gravelly SAND, medium-to coarse-grained, moist, ,t SP ` (1 1(" dense oo ppm 15 * Test boring was terminated at 12 feet during drilling on April 23, 1999. * No groundwater seepage was encountered during drilling. — r, * No visual or olfactory indications of contamination in soil. •., * Headspace measured in a sealed plastic container using a Photovac 2020 20 — Photoionization Device(PID). 25 — 30 -- 35 --- I 40— T 1 BORING LOG I ,i, G E O T E C I—I 95 Burnett Avenue South CONSULTANTS, INC. Renton, Washington i 14.,,. .--. --t_ loll No: Date: Logged by: Plate: 99132 May 1999 7,e,J 6 i • 11 i APPENDIX A 1 Oil Tank Locating Service Field Notes I I I I I 1 j I I 1 . 4•:• : OIL TAR-: LOCATION SER` "CE • • 206 533-9083 P.O. Box 33711 • Seattle, WA 98133 • ( ) 1 Ken Stoffel Page 1 of 2 TANK ill Job# Geotech ..lkddress 95 Burnett Ave S Renton, WA Invoice# 7633 lank Size Estimate 42"X95" = 550 Gal. Lay of Tank East to West Apx 26 inches Typeof Ground Cover Asphalt Depth Below Surface •frank Diameter 42 Inches Amount of Liquid 42 Inches Gal, GASOLIN mount of F TraceuelInches Gal. Amount of Water 142 Inches Gal. Date of Location 4/5/99 By: Ken Stoffel I Tank lays on east side of building, SE corner. 2 inch direct fill pipe Comments: 1 over west end of tank. Vent pipe not located. Tank outlined with white paint. IFill pipe exposed. 41:4 FED STORE - ELD # 95 /I 1 J + ��{iL1ING - N•G-------_- I # 10i -s * PARK. ill 44 Z AREA I I • • (NOT TO SCALE) it Every effort is made to be as accurate as possible when detecting for underground objects.However,because of possible fluctuations caused by various soil conditions and/or other metal objects in close proximity of said object and/or obstruction restricting proper use of locating equipment;Ken Stoffel DBA Oil Tank Location Service,will accept no liability for mistakes, 1 prrnrs nr omissions made in this report. OIL TALC LOCATION SERE + WA 98133 • 206 533-9083 P;O. Box 33711 Seattle, ( ) Ken Stoffel Page 2 of 2 TANK 12 -Address 95 Burnett Ave S Job# Geotech Renton, WA Invoice# 7633 rank Size Estimate 36"X50' = 2644 Gal. Lay of Tank North to South Depth Below Surface Apx 28 inches Type of Ground Cover Earth/Tree/Shrub irank Diameter 36 Inches Amount of Liquid Apx 1 Inches Gal. 112 Diesel Trace !Amount of Fuel 1 Inches Gal. Amount of Water Inches Gal. Date of Location 4/5/99 By: Ken Stoffel I Comments: Tank lays on west side of furnace room. Feed/Return lines in furnace room Iwere traced to south end of tank. Fi11 pipe not located. I FURNACE ,.n,, Room =*= fBIAL.DiAlG 11 ' 1 I fStD1.i'lEs1 12(RN II ' 1I { i l ' ! , n . .-l —7 ‘o--� z • I I I I I I T v ---- -- - TRANK * a. 1i i 4 1C .SQ' I • (NOT TO SCALE) I Every effort is made to be as accurate as possible when detecting for underground objects.However,because of possible fluctuations caused by various soil conditions and/or other metal objects in close proximity of said object and/or obstruction restricting proper use of locating equipment;Ken Stoffel DBA Oil Tank Location Service,will accept no liability for mistakes, 1 APPENDIX B 1 Laboratory Results TRANSGLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL GEOSCIENCES NORTHWEST, INC. 1 800 Sleater-Kinney SE,#262 Lacey, Washington 98503 Mobile Environmental Laboratories Telephone: 360-459-4670 Environmental Sampling Services Fax: 360-459-3432 May 11, 1999 Tim Johnson a T -E Geotech Consultants Inc. 13256 NE 20th Street MAY 1 3 1999 Suite 16 � t;h Bellevue,WA 98005 CONSULTANTS Dear Mr. Johnson: Please find enclosed the analytical data report for the Lande Project in Renton, Washington. Soil samples were analyzed for Diesel and Oil by NWTPH-Dx/Dx Extended, Gasoline by NWTPH-Gx and BTEX by Method 8020 on April 30, 1999. The results of these analyses are summarized in the attached tables. All soil values are reported on a dry weight basis. Applicable detection limits and QA/QC data are included. An invoice for this work is also enclosed. TEG Northwest appreciates the opportunity to have provided analytical services to Geotech Consultants for this project. It was a pleasure working with you, and we are looking forward to the next opportunity to work together. Sincerely, Sherry L. ChiIcutt Vice President OA/OC FOR ANALYTICAL METHODS GENERAL The TEG Northwest Laboratory quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC)procedures are conducted following the guidelines and objectives which meet or exceed certification/-accreditation requirements of California DOHS, Washington DOE, and Oregon DEQ. The Quality Control Program is a consistent set of procedures which assures data quality through the use of appropriate blanks, replicate analyses, surrogate spikes, and matrix spikes, and with the use of reference standards that meet or exceed EPA standards. Wheti analysestaking are place on-site with the mobile lab,the need for Field Blanks or Travel/Trip Blanks is eliminated. If there is going to be a delay before sample preparation for analysis, the sample is stored at 4° C. ANALYTICAL METHODS TEG Northwest Labs use analytical methodologies which are in conformity with U. S. Environmental Protection Agency(EPA), Washington DOE, and Oregon DEQ methodologies. When necessary and appropriate due to the nature or composition of the sample, TEG may use variations of the methods which are consistent with recognized standards or variations used by the industry and government laboratories. TPH-Gasoline,TPH-Diesel (Gasoline and/or Diesel,Modified EPA 8015,NWTPH-Gx and NWTPH-Dx) A check standard is run at the beginning of the day. 1) A close standard is run at the end of the day. 2) Both open and close standards must be within 15% of the continuing calibration curve value. All samples are prepared with a surrogate spike, and the recovery must be between 65% and 135% unless high sample concentrations interfere with the determination of the recovery percentage. A duplicate sample is run at a rate of 1 per 10 samples. At least 1 method blank is run per 20 samples analyzed. • Purgeable Volatile Aromatics (BTEX,EPA 602/8020) A check standard is run at the beginning of the day. The check standard is run at the end of the day. Both open and close standards must be within 15% of the continuing calibration curve value. All samples are prepared with a surrogate spike, and the recovery must be between 65% and 135%unless high sample concentrations interfere with the determination of the recovery percentage. At least 1 1 method blank is run per day. j I I I I I I :l I - . 1 TEG NW SEATTt.E CHEMISTRY LABORATORY (425)957-9872,fax(425)957-9904 TEG Job Number: S90430-6 i . Client: GEOTECH CONSULTANTS Client Job Name: LANDE Client Job Number: 0 Analytical Results MS MSD RPD NWTPH-Gx/BTEX (8020) MTH BLK LCS B1 B2 B1 B1 Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil - Date extracted Reporting 04/30/99 04/30/99 04l30/99 04/0/99 04/30/99 04/30/99 j Date analyzed Limits 04/30/99 04/30/99 04/30/99 04/30/99 04/30/99 04/30/99 NWTPH-Gx, mq/kq I Mineral spirits/Stoddard solvent 5.0 nd nd Gasoline 5.0 nd nd BTEX(8020), iq/kq Benzene 50 nd 70% nd 91% 74% 22% Toluene 50 nd 76% nd 99% 81% 20% Ethylbenzene 50 nd nd IXylenes 50 nd nd Surrogate recoveries: Trifluorotoluene 69% 78% 73% 82% 74% IBromofluorobenzene 80% 87% 88% 93% 91% Data Qualifiers and Analytical Comments nd-not detected at listed reporting limits na-not analyzed C-coelution with sample peaks I M-matrix interference J-estimated value • Results reported on dry-weight basis Acceptable Recovery limits:65%TO 135% j Acceptable RPD limit:35% •1 I . I . I I I Page 1 of 1 1. - - , ITEG NW SEATTLE CHEMISTRY LABORATORY (425)957-9872,fax(425)957-9904 . 1 TEG Job Number: S90430-6 Client: GEOTECH CONSULTANTS Client Job Name: LANDE IClient Job Number: 0 Analytical Results NWTPH-Dx, mg/kg MTH BLK B2 Matrix Soil Soil Soil l Date extracted Reporting 04/30/99 04/30/99 Date analyzed Limits 04/30/99 04/30/99 • Kerosene/Jet fuel 20 nd nd I Diesel/Fuel oil 20 nd nd Heavy oil 50 nd nd Surrogate recoveries: I Fluorobiphenyl 102% 104% o-Terphenyl 102% 104% Data Qualifiers and Analytical Comments nd-not detected at listed reporting limits na-not analyzed I C-coelution with sample peaks M-matrix interference J-estimated value Results reported on dry-weight basis 1 Acceptable Recovery limits:65%TO 13596 . Acceptable RPD limit:35% I 1 i 1 r 1 Page 1 of 1 TRANSGLOBAL Sq6LI30 —(0 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RE O . ENVIRONMENTAL eg ll GEOSCIENCES a,ENT: -,..X'' 2. , ., r - DATE: l / 3k) /1 ). PAGE I OF ( _ )RESS: 11)-S-(0 06 10, 5 t i(.0 1� 'ir viAe_ 014- SYou)r PROJECT NAME: 1--4/1' k )NE ``/1_- 17`( -1 - S i, l k FAX: (Lit).) 7--1 ) - S(P 1 LOCATION: £. 6.,,,_ )-, ,� /. \ + ENT PROJECT #: '"'I/I l j PROJECT MANAGER: I I h., , 0 +r./,5„t COLLECTOR: / '"^ (1 A It Pssr— coin ero►+ 1�/ )/r o n 4- i E a c�ti o o po h� • ) a�� v� oo �000�c, �P9 E S o E �y O Q y = =Pv to o.: a0�ry1> Co ry �q O-.. 8'.h 40 A ,:: 0 �P a,U �� .. Z C p Sample �' a ` o0 0, hQ �� ��� Q� ci tz" iple Number Depth Time Type Container Type .P ..f ,o� c e „Q� .e. 4Qs Q�- e ..0- oQ A° Q s• FIELD NOTES I `o J r)- , l,. / .Y1 S 1.flr. X C ,INQUISHED;BY(Signature) DATE/TIME RECEIVED BY(Signature) DATE/TIME t/D SAMPLE RECEIPT LABORATORY NOTES: ,-'10 ( r LI1�� '1 /. . 4 o M)9)Vr�� , y 30/,9Iy OTAL NUMBER OF CONTAINERS I� 7 )1 INOUISHED BY(Signature) DATE/TIME ED BY(Signature) DATE/TIME CHAIN OF CUSTODY SEALS Y/N/NA • SEALS INTACT?Y/N/NA SAMPLE DISPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS RECEIVED GOOD COND./COLD ITJTEG DISPOSAL @$2.00 each O Return O Pickup NOTES: ?Dk PeOPFeTIFs INCI OEVELOPMEfy7 P February 6, 2001 CITY OF RENTpVivIV#NG FEB 07200p RECEIVED Mr. Steve Taylor • Senior Planner Planning/Building/Public Works Renton City Hall—6th Floor 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: 95 Burnett Project Dear Iteve: Enclo led is the Soil Report dated September 21, 1999 you reques Sincer • Paul kow Preside t r One Pacific Building ' 621 Pacific Ave., #300 Tacoma, WA 98402-4611 Office: (253) 627-4070 Fax: (253 627-4049 a ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. 2122- 112th Avenue North East,Suite B-100 Bellevue,Washington 98004 (425)455-9025 FAX:(425)455-2316 September 21, 1999 7N 9319 Mr. Charlie Keeslar 555 South Renton Village, Suite 775 Renton, Washington 98055 Subject: PRELIMINARY SUBSURFACE SAMPLING & TESTING Commercial Property 73 - 77 Burnett Avenue South Renton,Washington Mr. Keeslar: ° Environmental Associates, Inc. (EAI)has completed preliminary subsurface sampling and testing of soil and groundwater on the northern portion of the subject property in an effort to assess the potential for the presence of gasoline,kerosene,diesel,and heavy-oil range petroleum hydrocarbons, as well as gasoline-associated benzene,toluene,ethylbenzene,and xylene(BTEX)constituents.This report, prepared in accordance with the terms of our proposal dated August 12, 1999, summarizes our approach to the project along with results and conclusions. The contents of this report are confidential and are intended solely for your use and the use of your representatives.Four(4) copies of this report are being distributed to you at the address indicated above.No other distribution or discussion of this report will take place without your prior approval in writing. On August 27, 1999, four (4) Strataprobe borings ("direct-push" hydraulic and percussion drive- point sampling system) were completed on the subject site, along with sampling of soils and groundwater at each exploration locality(approximate exploration localities are depicted graphically on Plate 2, Site Exploration Map, attached to this report). The exploration localities included areas on the subject site in, and adjacent to, the interpreted localities of the former on-site above-ground storage tanks, adjacent to the interpreted locality of the fuel-dispenser area, and adjacent to a historical loading dock area and underground piping. Relying upon results of laboratory testing, it would appear that soils sampled from the localities of the former above-ground tanks and the loading dock area on the subject site(borings B-1,B-2, and B-4) contain concentrations of gasoline-range petroleum hydrocarbons, as well as kerosene and/or 4- �: � • ,:_' - Associate Offices: Oregon/San Francisco Bay Area 1A { , Mr. Charlie Keeslar JN 9319 September 21, 1999 Page - 2 diesel-range petroleum hydrocarbons,in excess of the current Washington Department of Ecology (WDOE) Method A cleanup levels for these contaminants. Soil sampled at boring locality B-3 (adjacent to the fuel dispenser area) did not contain detectable petroleum contaminant concentrations. In contrast to the results of soil testing,testing of groundwater sampled from borings B-1,B-2, and B-4 revealed trace levels only of gasoline-range petroleum hydrocarbons(below the current WDOE Method A cleanup level for gasoline), with the exception of a concentration of benzene in groundwater sampled from boring B-4 slightly exceeding the current WDOE Method A cleanup level for benzene.No gasoline-range petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in groundwater sampled from boring B-3, and no concentrations of kerosene, diesel, or heavy-oil range petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in groundwater sampled from each of the four(4)borings. A discussion of thesefindings/conclusions in the context of current WDOE regulatory requirements, as well as discussions of potentially viable remedial activities, are offered for your consideration later in this report under the section titled "Conclusions/Recommendations". We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this assignment. If you have any questions or if we may be of additional service,please do not hesitate to contact us. Respectfully submitted, P Y ENVIRONMENTAL A IATES, INC. Don W. Spencer, Sc., P.G., R.E.A. Principal Registered Site Assessor/Licensed UST Supervisor State Certification#947458636 License: W000010 (Washington) License: 11464 (Oregon) License: 876 (California) License: 5195 (Illinois) License: 0327 (Mississippi) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. • : -M- :;_ PRELIMINARY:SUBSURFACE;. ::; _ : SAMPLING & TESTING Commercial Property 73 - 77 Burnett Avenue South Renton, Washington Prepared for: Mr. Charlie Keeslar 555 South Renton Village, Suite 775 Renton,Washington 98055 Questions regarding this investigation, the conclusions reached and the recommendations given should be addressed to one of the following undersigned. I " es R. Ruef Environmental Geologist IFCl/WDOE-Certified Site Assessor (DGe. Don W. Spencer, Sc.,P.G.,R.E.A. Principal Registered Site Assessor/Licensed UST Supervisor State Certification#947458636 License: W000010 (Washington) License: 11464 (Oregon) License: 876 (California) License: 5195 (Illinois) License: 0327 (Mississippi) Reference Job Number: JN 9319 September 21, 1999 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. • • TABL Ef O F4CdNiitt S .1 INTRODUCTION/SCOPE OF WORK 5 Site/Project Description 5 FINDINGS 6 Subsurface Investigation 6 ] Laboratory Analysis 7 CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS 10 LIMITATIONS 13 REFERENCES 14 PLATES Plate 1 - Vicinity Map Plate 2 - Site Exploration Map Plate 3 - Boring Log B-1 Plate 4 - Boring Log B-2 Plate 5 - Boring Log B-3 Plate 6 - Boring Log B-4 APPENDIX Laboratory Report ti ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Mr. Charlie Keeslar JN 9319 September 21, 1999 Page - 5 INTRODUCTION/SCOPE. OF WORK. SITE/PROJECT DESCRIPTION The subject property includes a rectangular-shaped parcel covering approximately 30,000 square feet of land. Improvements to the property include several office, shed, and warehouse structures. A fence separates the northern portion from the southern portion of the subject property, with the northern portion currently occupied by Canber Corps(general contractors for remodeling,painting, landscaping, etc.), and the southern portion currently occupied by D.S. Purcell Painting, Inc. The focus of this study is on the northern portion of the subject property. The property is located in a mixed commercial and residential area just north of the downtown core of Renton, Washington. Surrounding properties include a residential apartment complex to the north(Cedar River Terrace), Burnett Avenue South to the east, across which lies the Salvation Army, a grass lawn area to the west,with Walt's Muffler Service further to the west,and Northwest Pneumatic and Electric Repair situated to the south of the site.The approximate location of the site is shown on the Vicinity Map, Plate 1, appended herewith. A previous use of the subject site prior to the early-to-mid 1960's included a bulk petroleum distribution facility,with three approximately 19,000-gallon capacity above-ground storage tanks used for gasoline and kerosene storage (and perhaps diesel fuel storage as well). The tanks were reportedly located on the northern-most portion of the subject site (please refer to Plate 2, Site Exploration Map, for the approximate interpreted locality of the former tanks, as well as other site improvements), and an associated fuel dispenser area was located along the east-central portion of the site. Other structures were reportedly used as a garage, a barrel platform, and as warehouse and office space. Current Study Your expressed interests, which included the desire to conduct a preliminary evaluation of subsurface conditions to assess the potential for the presence ofpetroleum hydrocarbon contaminants (gasoline, diesel, kerosene, heavy oil), presented in our proposal to you dated August 12, 1999, formed the basis for the following scope of work: • Completing four (4) Strataprobe borings with a truck-mounted unit along with soil and groundwater sampling, at localities on the subject property in interpreted locations (or adjacent to the interpreted locations) of the former tank cluster, the fuel-dispenser area, and barrel platfoiun/loading dock; • Laboratory analysis of selected soil samples using gas chromatography by WDOE method NWTPH-Gas/BTEX for the presence of gasoline-range petroleum hydrocarbons and associated BTEX constituents, and by WDOE method NWTPH-Dx (diesel extended) for petroleum hydrocarbons in the kerosene, diesel, and heavy-oil ranges; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Mr. Charlie Keeslar JN 9319 September 21, 1999 Page - 6 • • Preparation of this summary report documenting the methodology and results of the investigation. .. . ... :. .. . .. . SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION Strataprobe Boring and Soil Sampling Four(4) Strataprobe borings were made on August 27, 1999 at the approximate locations noted as B-1 through B-4 on the Site Exploration Map,Plate 2.The boring locations were chosen based upon the interpreted localities of the former tanks, fuel-dispenser area, and the barrel platform. Some limitations n terms of access for probing were imposed by trees, site structures, and a water line in the area north of the Canber Corps. Office The configuration of the former on-site bulk petroleum fuel distribution facility was interpreted based upon review of historical Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps and other maps provided by the property owner. A truck-mounted direct-push hydraulic and percussion drive-point unit equipped with 2-inch outer diameter hollow-stem stainless steel sampling equipment(Strataprobe) was employed to complete the borings. Under the supervision of our staff geologist,the Strataprobe unit was brought into position over each selected exploration location,blocked up,and leveled before advancing each boring.Following set- up preparations, the boring/sampling technique consisted of hydraulically advancing a three foot length split-spoon sampler with a plastic sample sleeve into the ground.The sampler and sleeve was then withdrawn and opened for examination and transfer of the soil sample to laboratory prepared glassware. The sampling process was then repeated (continuously sampled in three-foot intervals) with a clean, sterilized sampler and sleeve until the desired maximum depth was achieved(15 feet below the ground surface at each locality). Samples were transferred from the sampler directly to sterilized glassware with teflon-sealed lids furnished by the project laboratory. Samples were stored in an iced chest at the site and taken to the laboratory in this condition in an effort to preserve sample integrity.Each jar was clearly labeled as to boring and sample number/depth,date,time,project,etc.EPA-recommended sample-management protocol, including maintenance of chain of custody documentation was observed at each stage of the project. During drilling, a field log was made by the project geologist for each boring. Information recorded versus corresponding depth included soil classification (Unified Soil Classification System), color, texture, apparent moisture content, odors (if present), etc. A small portion of each soil sample was subjected to "field screening" for volatile organic vapors P using a portable organic vapor detector instrument (Photovac PID). The screening technique consisted of placing a small portion of each soil sample into a sealed jar and leaving the sample for ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Mr. Charlie Keeslar JN 9319 September 21, 1999 Page - 7 a period of several minutes to allow volatile organic compounds (such as gasoline and associated BTEX constituents,kerosene,and diesel fuel)which might be contained within each soil sample to vaporize.A small probe attached to the detection instrument was then inserted into the"headspace" • within each jar via a small access port in the jar lid,and a measurement of the volatile organic vapors (if any were present) was made. Field screening measurements were performed on selected soil samples taken during the course of the probing program.The results of the headspace measurements are included in the boring logs appended to this report as Plates 3 through 6. Subsurface Conditions • Soil types encountered during probing were generally similar from boring-to-boring, and consisted of 1.5 to 2 feet of brown,moist,silty sand fill material.These shallow fill soils were found to overlie 3 to 4 inches of concrete at boring localities B-1 and B-2, and soils below the fill material and/or concrete consisted of alternating layers of moist, gray to brown, fine-grained silty sand and sandy silt to a depth of approximately 12 feet below the ground surface,below which soils consisted of very moist, fine-to-medium grained sand, grading to wet, gravelly sand to the maximum depth explored of 15 feet below the ground surface. Groundwater was encountered at approximately 14 feet below the ground surface at each boring locality.Please refer to the boring logs attached to this report as Plates 3 through 6 for a description of specific subsurface conditions encountered at each boring location. Very strong petroleum odors were noted emanating from soil sampled at boring localities B-1 and B-2 at depths ranging from approximately 3 feet to 11 feet below the ground surface, and from soil ranging in depth from approximately 10 to 13 feet at boring locality B-4 during soil probing and sampling.No petroleum odors were noted emanating from any ofthe soils sampled at boring locality B-3 (adjacent to the fuel dispenser area).As previously discussed,please refer to the boring logs for results of volatile organic vapors detected during headspace measurements completed on selected soil samples using a Photovac photo-ionization detector(PID). LABORATORY ANALYSIS In general accordance with Washington Department ofEcology(WDOE)site assessment protocols, laboratory analysis was performed on selected soil and groundwater samples from borings B-1,B-2, B-3,and B-4,using gas chromatography by WDOE methods NWTPH-Gas/BTEX and NWTPH-Dx Extended for the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons in the gasoline range, along with gasoline- associated benzene,toluene,ethylbenzene,and xylene(BTEX),and kerosene,diesel,and heavy-oil range petroleum hydrocarbons. Soil samples submitted for laboratory analysis from each boring were chosen on the basis of relative organic vapor headspace PID measurements, or in the case of boring B-3,based upon the relatively high moisture content encountered at approximately 8 feet below the ground surface along with the similar depth of the "worst case" soil samples (as determined through field screening techniques) from borings B-1 and B-2. The laboratory report is appended to this report. The following tables summarize the results of laboratory testing. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Mr. Charlie Keeslar JN 9319 i September 21, 1999 r Page - 8 .Js n,�_.'.„ +- h.^ ..`r` �- r 't' ey �s'w:+ �k"•t.4 ,S."is y�*i,,3f �' "a. »., �� ,� WNTPH,,,Gastug,,. r , �;� '� salts il ' N, , � � � � �� ����p ��; , 1y �= �,�., �.��•. aborato --Testing Re J. .� � _�§� �- a". �,�:w:��:. 1Y,' -3�- -v d -eere * gi b Y' .•. '{•.,, >e g 7,,,.5,,.E ,: Y.k'. r:. t 4�t �-'xi�y' ''�'�'�^. b.n..aa-3c":a bf� +L`+Y-'i y^�U{{�� �V,.Jy ..� ,, -. J;.. ,. :i , 1 P,Ai tS�and'lim,a nz, ,arts per, milliota PPIP), �,< _�F; ii-v- J Sample NWTPH-Gas Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes Number/Depth (gasoline range) 5g r1,**��,,ATZ; rt 7N £� wtiKilt f fit B-1 @7' (7.-8.) 9A 0.46 2.6 %f 2 .ifi 4iaafri Jr i B-2 @6' (6'-7'I ., tt4 0 ND' 0.5 1.2 4.2 j B-3 @8' (8'-9') ND ND ND ND ND ili L,'G"Szr.t T . B-4 @12' (12'-13') x' L' r3QQ rt2L ND 1.2 0.18 2.9 Reporting Limit' 5.0 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 Cleanup Level3 100 0.5 40 20 20 NOTES: 1 - "ND" denotes analyte not detected at or above listed Reporting Limit. 2- "Reporting Limit" represents the laboratory lower quantitation limit. 3 - Method A soil cleanup levels as offered in the Model Toxics Control Act (MICA), Chapter 173-340-740 WAC. Shading denotes reported concentration exceeds the current WDOE IMethod A cleanup level. �_�',^diR:�l ".�;:N3j.. `t3'�.�5a'_- "rtsw. �}:-n:: -FaCik1'.�;h�:E,�:tii i.+ ,:cam .•a;^p;.�'�;�- e':,�c�'" a:3:�«�Uar�ia•��, :�.�µ4•'�i�''�b"c,�`d»M.<�•:,,:.•ec�"�.-•�:_ k Y ;:s�"�-�:, r M f.: y 4 a r a, .,3�„ `;:ta\')-,�:.�"H�x;,,- •.>fi �"<:.PI -:",•r F„'�';•z'. �+. L �`Ia*�2....W,F.� ., j �=.:�.�. .�;B.0 �, '�Y„k�Trl�'�h�1i`?: „'k�.. 1 "�5:, _: .,��R""^,�a �<'_�.�<�.��.ta�& E» `--.;�: �.,: ;� �,. ��:�s �?.x3�v},:r ,7r�s��--vt• ?,i1 44—'44. I i,litt:91PIP,` 3`e!,Png Resu is. 9.11014WTMR.)4 Ezctended ; s w t, +,"-��`:�.a• :c.�..Ngw _�S;x.�l^r.,..t.3 s; •.�.. ..,�z.� *�.,,a'- -...^�:,..- a+�,..,�_&'�exr?^ c�,:..hi,':'a. N.'•,&°a.'..�.»y +�:t:-n=i4fi:r ..8.�'K-�.. ..,;-'p - F.0 ,J r.,:,a;a� � �a?;,,`�t�:;-s�'.�',e.;o ,.=•;_>x!:i}•..,{r3�'•.kc=�a±at�y;;ei+u-� ".`avaKvero •;....�';z',=••; .�.":':a».:�:_,,,�.'rs:•:+o-ra�.�.w�"e�.�i >�,-,� 'h..r`..�--•o.�i'hZ.a .`s: ��+ -.p I .01- ine4ti:�results.-and 70m is ".. .. ,,;,,,.. .,,,�, .:�+?;`..�s;<-':�e;.� �.�:�� . ....M..,.a.,..,�.w-.. ,..�,r4'...,.,��a'1���sper TTl�lli017 �pp:��:'!i.=�.�?u: �-w>�....�,;>... €;`;�. .. �- ='3 .i�;�iz r:?:, �eY rs. :.rsa t;�'u*..:r-t;�:an:. -a.`». .i�' _ ,7i:ni:� Sample Number/Depth NWTPH-Dx - NWTPH-Dx NWTPH-Dx (kerosene range) (diesel range) (heavy-oil range) -^.�:t:•;;';emo'. ,{:a..:•=�Y;t+:-u�t"��st+�-'e:pl'�.,�'`t:�..w '. '-i"�-'T. .r`av'-'-`� 'Y ::.{��L.::yi` -'Y,`�a:;'{;7 Ytis�m'.t'�>..?Yr'1 +,,y((:I', : .-;S.. =kbr.+44 •Gp", =i rt'.rr'.-it;31 SXc Yit,,N t N3'ik:..3 .<:.,.Eta•i':.�. Y !y' T:,r,.�'m` 1 B-1 @7' (7'-8') ��<-�..:.���;-»;�lt.00»::x,,�'��'�-�,�`;��wti��.�::"�����,��1Op4. _���� ND :7i;L":-;'.4'L'�-yci'r3�`x t+n �,�ERM.�+ •«`.:,s^-ZIP.C-,: ... i.P.•a`{Y'=C B-2 @6' (6`-7') ; �,�,-xwy�1 55,0, z '��*"�'���-�;:,;4 0?�=t ��- ND 8-3 @8' (8'-9') ND ND ND B-4 @12' (12'-13') :g4'e4: „4-5.Q.Q ,==`ter:- ND ND .! Reporting Limit' 20 20 25 Cleanup Level3 200 200 200 INOTES: 1 - "ND" denotes analyte not detected at or above listed Reporting Limit. 2 - "Reporting Limit" represents the laboratory lower quantitation limit. 3- Method A soil cleanup levels as offered in the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA), Chapter I 173-340-740 WAC. Shading denotes that the reported concentration exceeds the current WDOE Method A cleanup level. 1 Relying upon the results of laboratory analysis as summarized in the preceding tables, and as a included in the laboratory reports appended to this report, it appears that soil sampled at boring localities B-1, B-2, and B-4 contained concentrations of gasoline-range petroleum hydrocarbons, along with kerosene and/or diesel-range petroleum hydrocarbons, in excess of the current WDOE Method A cleanup levels for these contaminants in soil. No concentrations of gasoline, kerosene, diesel, or heavy-oil range petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in soil tested from boring B-3. ! , ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 Ii Mr. Charlie Keeslar JN 9319 September 21, 1999 Page - 9 Groundwater samples were subjected to the identical testing which was completed on the selected soil samples. The following tables summarize the results of laboratory testing of groundwater samples. 3` c“ti "} »�tS `n 4.2,g�ts�cr!-,a'"',''a',"-s.75:,js.y=^�;r ri. c" 4`�[Y*4+h?."; `�'�vT I= AP f .•" �,'. v'^ c�-'� k 'w,.i^'.6i '��+.,, ,i�'^'�=^�„ '�.,xl.�. '3 '.rr,°'�+.a,?.. � '� +�. Iw,.....� i�.. � ?, , 3'''�k�;, � ;,, z ,t LaboratoryiTesting��R_esults Ground ate`r ll VYAR. -GadinErX 'x.;"ay ' •L ,n � r : ^ t ` ."A results°ar'�,d Emits ,I. arMY er ti>II91.1 MPul:<"wal , tia�...6•�.. ..,. ..i s...?_... II fY,"i. 1�:-.—y �kw' �ve� �Y.....y�.hs�S)•W5:?..F.':�,'RS. Sample Number NWTPH-Gas Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes (gasoline range) B-1 GW 510 ND' ND 2.9 9.8 B-2 GW 230 ND ND ND ND B-3 GW ND ND ND ND ND ;13'� N D B 4 GW 750 a s')q..2 ,,-; 1.3 ND Reporting Limit2 100 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Cleanup Level3 1000 5.0 40 30 20 NOTES: 1 - "ND" denotes analyte not detected at or above listed Reporting Limit. 2 - "Reporting Limit" represents the laboratory lower quantitation limit. 3 - Method A groundwater cleanup levels as offered in the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA), Chapter 173-340-720 WAC. Shading denotes reported concentration exceeds the current WDOE Method A cleanup level. - -- _ - - c,�..a». ;!F,�.y� re• s.,:r.,u-.:t;�;y.Ri�g� •.�rs.':•xy.f�s�`se,, ,..n,,..r,_ ,ry�^•r..: c,�g, :r:- -- ^��,.. '=sic=.; :..a�.;�.,.� »-,;.r,�....,. zr, s. '•�;�s^:C.riF. U.�• .8, ..,k,;Y.3', M..�., *W3'. '3"-rl�So-ti"gi :;2 ,i°'3<^^-: _ „: 'k�. .W, rf, ..,7-c..:-l. .a-:. .%._ A.t iix�"..'., _ ..xz^s="�t ":.�.r.�e_ :� �.. �;v, „,2'= 'y�::c��� a^�' `:".�,^. `<2:- i<1:,.. •??c'��,.-,.ti:"J.F,.'i.°,.";:�^�. '.>'`- .._r'.P.'.'k�sz:':�a`�^��4:i�"'%'Aa k.� _.-��. F'_•,.�.a-fj3'=41t'-��,}� �"�.; .,Z.. •'r.��=-�`#u"ss?.r:,rS 2 �..••� .�ft.:`Y.�a::, a'}'=„a•- .-t -e;E',<?..�•s;S. ;M' 'sic. ..';'-: �'al *.f.. 'r 'x, 01-... �1'';cN. • �t:,: _�,_ _,.�� L o �.;.1"esting�?Results.ny�rwour.�iiwat�e�.��.��W�TP�=Uy�E�xte�i �c�> �<�r��'. ,�,��:r, ':s, `?'-': >.»';..;-�,-,»_ rr..,;;4 ,i--- -,.a,..; •._,-0 .:—,: ;-,..;v.;ec;' ..a : ` I,'.>x:u•:k`a..�..t L+'.:a 1'4 ".:-OVI- u?:=a i.,.•[ - .,y,�j,�= �f. �:.a. � `.••Y'i•`-'>`s _ ::>•. �.. _'.'t}.�'-.:'� .s?.�,t°c�7;RF` .r+: ^.K�� k. 4 ,,,y 5=;.:^ '..+. -1�+'�3.+?'<-.`= =y�;=F4 4i� _ N- i t_-i;x ;s,r S '�.:.,., ?ycr'-cn �?!".:'i`""'. .- _ .O , isia— Allliesults aril°limrtswm.V arts r.�:b�llton ('_ r:. •, ' .-,., .�•:: •,c.:�,.r,�.s,,.-,.r::-,es�=�e;:txrr.�sS� .x�..{<....., . .... .. <. aw.,....Y..»u x_..�a..�. .,.-�.�,..,,- � . .l?..,.<.,..-0 _,. r�a3...^,.s�=-Y-._.>.......-_.x.. Sample Number NWTPH-Dx NWTPH-Dx NWTPH-Dx (kerosene range) (diesel range) (heavy-oil range) B-1 GW ND ND ND B-2 GW ND ND ND B-3 GW ND ND ND B-4 GW ND ND ND Reporting Limit2 20 20 25 Cleanup Level3 200 200 200 NOTES: 1 - "ND" denotes analyte not detected at or above listed Reporting Limit. 2 - "Reporting Limit" represents the laboratory lower quantitation limit. 3 - Method A groundwater cleanup levels as offered in the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA), Chapter 173-340-720 WAC. Shading denotes that the reported concentration exceeds the current WDOE Method A cleanup level. Relying upon the results of laboratory analysis as summarized in the preceding tables, and as included in the laboratory reports appended to this report, it appears that groundwater sampled at boring localities B-1, B-2, B-3, and B-4 does not contain concentrations of gasoline, kerosene, diesel, and/or heavy-oil range petroleum hydrocarbons in excess of the current WDOE Method A • ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. s Mr. Charlie Keeslar JN 9319 September 21, 1999 Page - 10 cleanup levels for these contaminants in groundwater, with the exception of a concentration of benzene(12 ppb)detected in groundwater sampled at boring locality B-4 which exceeds the current WDOE Method A cleanup level of 5 ppb. CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS. I As discussed in the preceding report sections,the findings of this effort suggest that shallow soils at the site at exploration localities B-1, B-2, and B-3 contain concentrations of gasoline-range petroleum hydrocarbons,as well as kerosene and/or diesel-range petroleum hydrocarbons,exceeding the current WDOE Method A cleanup levels for these contaminants.The highest concentrations of these contaminants appear to be present at depths ranging from approximately 3 feet to 11 feet below the ground surface at boring localities B-1 and B-2 (proximal to the former tank cluster), and at a depth range of approximately 11 feet to 13 feet below the ground surface at exploration locality B-4 (adjacent to the loading dock of a warehouse space and to the interpreted locality of former underground fuel piping). 1 Testing of groundwater sampled from each of the four (4) borings revealed that, at the localities sampled, it does not appear that the petroleum contaminants identified in site soils are present in groundwater at concentrations exceeding the current WDOE Method A cleanup levels for these contaminants,with the exception of benzene detected in groundwater sampled from boring B-4 at a concentration slightly exceeding the WDOE Method A cleanup level for benzene. 4 The source mechanism (or mechanisms) for the release (or releases) of contaminants is not fully known at this time, and, given the preliminary nature of this current study, the areal and vertical extent of the contaminants on the site have not yet been fully assessed. Acknowledging these limitations,it would be our tentative conclusion that, given the historical use of the subject site for petroleum storage and distribution,the contaminants discovered are likely associated with the former bulk petroleum distribution facility. In addition, acknowledging that it has been approximately 35 years since the bulk facility existed and was operating on the subject property,it would appear that the primary source of the contaminants discovered is no longer present on the site. In terms of corrective actions,limitations imposed by soil types(fine-grained sands and silts),which tend to "hold" or immobilize hydrocarbons to some degree, as well as by the presence of several different petroleum-range hydrocarbon contaminants,appear to restrict the number of viable cleanup options available. The following actions leading to site remediation are offered here for your consideration: 1) Installation of groundwater monitoring wells along the down-gradient hydrological.margins of the subject site(north and northeast margins); ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Mr. Charlie Keeslar JN 9319 September 21, 1999 Page - 11 2) Excavation and transport of contaminated soil to an off-site treatment facility, along with emplacement of clean back-fill material following excavation work (may require the demolition of some on-site structures); 3) Limited application of oxygen release compound (ORC) to the excavation areas prior to back-filling with clean soil; These alternatives are verybrieflydiscussed in the following paragraphs. 1 -Installation of Groundwater Monitoring Wells As previously discussed,possible impacts to groundwater quality on the site have not yet been fully assessed. Relying upon results of laboratory testing of groundwater "grab" sampled from the Strataprobe borings, it would appear that trace levels of gasoline contaminants are present in site groundwater.In an effort to evaluate groundwater quality at the site to demonstrate compliance with current Washington Department of Ecology(WDOE)cleanup levels,groundwater monitoring wells will be required by the WDOE.A series of several groundwater monitoring wells could be installed along the northern and northeastern margins of the subject property to afford assessment of groundwater quality on the down-gradient hydrological margins of the subject site. These wells could be used to evaluate whether or not contaminants are migrating off-site and onto neighboring properties via groundwater flow, and could also be used to monitor groundwater quality during and/or after soil/groundwater remediation efforts(if completed).Groundwater assessment(quality, flow direction,etc.)is an important factor in demonstrating compliance with cleanup guidelines to the WDOE should the client desire to apply(following site cleanup efforts)for a"no further action" determination by Ecology. 2-Excavation and Treatment of Contaminated Soil A trackhoe excavator could be employed to excavate petroleum-hydrocarbon contaminated soils. The soils would then be transported off site to a treatment facility (presuming acceptance by a treatment facility). Clean back-fill material would then be placed in the excavation areas. Removal of some of the site buildings would be necessary to allow access to some of the contaminated soil. In addition, prior to excavation work, additional sampling and testing may be required to further assess the areal and vertical extent of the contaminants discovered during the course of this current study. Some"confirmation"sampling and testing would also be performed at the conclusion of the removal effort to document status of remaining soil at the end of the cleanup. 3-Limited Application of Oxygen Release Compound (ORC) As previously discussed, although only one contaminant concentration (benzene in groundwater sampled from boring B-4) exceeding the current WDOE Method A cleanup levels for petroleum contaminants in groundwater was discovered during this current study,groundwater quality on the site has not yet been fully assessed. Trace levels of contaminants in the boiling range of gasoline ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 Mr. Charlie Keeslar JN 9319 September 21, 1999 Page - 12 were present in groundwater sampled from three of the four borings completed for this current study. It is conceivable that higher contaminant concentrations may exist at other localities on the subject Iproperty not yet explored. Excavation and removal of contaminated soil which currently exists at depths above the shallow groundwater table on the site would be a significant risk-mitigating action with respect to future groundwater contamination,particularly if the groundwater impacts detected thus far are the result of leaching of the soil contaminants into the groundwater. However, in an effort to treat contaminated groundwater, oxygen release compound (ORC) could be applied directly to the cleanup excavation prior to back-filling activities. The ORC stimulates growth of aerobic bacteria I (according to case studies provided to EAT by Regenesis Bioremediation Products)which greatly increases the rate of degradation of petroleum contaminants over naturally occurring degradation rates. The earlier proposed groundwater monitoring wells could be periodically sampled(perhaps 1 on a quarterly basis) following soil cleanup and ORC application in an effort to evaluate progress of the groundwater cleanup and/or compliance with WDOE groundwater cleanup levels. I Decision-making authority regarding selection and implementation of appropriate corrective actions at the site clearly lies with the property owner.Depending on your current needs,EAI can prepare written cost estimates/work proposals to perform the corrective actions discussed_in this report. Finally,EAT recommends that a copy of this report be forwarded to the WDOE for their review and inclusion in their files.In an effort to comply with the requirements of the Model Toxics Control Act Iregarding site discovery and reporting(WAC 173-340-300),the report should be forwarded to the WDOE within 90 days. I 1 I I 1 I I IENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Mr. Charlie Keeslar JN 9319 September 21, 1999 Page - 13 LIMITATIONS This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Mr. Charlie Keeslar, along with his several representatives, for specific application to this site. Our work for this project was conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill normally exercised by members of the environmental science profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the area, and in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in our proposal dated August 12, 1999. The findings and conclusions of this study are based upon observations and testing made at separated boring locations on the subject property. Conditions may vary between the borings or at other locations and/or depths. The remediation approach included under the "Conclusions/Recommendations" section of this report is for planning purposes only, does not constitute a proposal to complete work, and is subject to modification based upon actual site conditions,duration of cleanup project,cleanup methodologies used,timing,etc.No other warranty, I expressed or implied, is made. If new information is developed in future site work which may include excavations, borings, studies, analyses, etc., Environmental Associates, Inc., must be retained to reevaluate the conclusions of this report and to provide amendments as required. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. _..... __ w .. `4•'• WKSt11LE p AY fl?ti�rSA:�•�•. `� -1 ,'T's "•- .'6 --'- �,_ .,. ,•r ,� ! Y, •'('t.•t•.'^i`f !j .•1,,'*- :., ''suel}�•. S'3HfrN1 r qy yN OM Avs .. - 11 s e. ,x � `E'` y'; m: J•'r- 'L% sue' �, is ,,a 'rx ...w s .7 r I \� :g..... 5. . _.f!:-la �,1.; /` POWELL AV 5}! ' �r ,{y5 T O� _1�� / T --— =- - r'-- - ,t ,y•, R4£"r u,ru• ,xo I ° Ay sy >A x rA" - „ yti `it, ,a&J7 t'-"," - - ♦ i _ p _'. ,-Fi.:zooid- &TH a- P I 4 , -• R5E 5 , �j I a iC 1 7. SN ��� AY91 Ih! '" sLlND *: SENECA p' © '-0 ;,J 1 (��"`wF�f pAV . . s _ k , , rtw- Sy�i/1 r�s} N Z ZEGI � • -n Pa- I l STtrpIS.L1Y'.. -• El LI ,'. V. Fy E VALLEY .1 �� ► ! -.I t- gaiQ�AMit,1 t 't 6 O I �/� 1 tom►_ S AyrAsa �� � 11I� .. e 4a. NO ED ,';-‘841.1..'.te.4,, t 1.I.p...1/4.14.1i..3...4_,-1,:fic:.--:.!:;;;•!;-.11i •1 qi, N4 st3t,,1 1 7. 111:11:P, it 5„.ft,„," ill& M �. c y i 4 � r-. -•' "m� -5 .�fl` � _/ill C3 _ A y S o '^ I500 ) '~ otio r1C�1/� 4 t w u ' t]o " + 'fir ' $ 4f -` _. -- Vl rl�I,Y N\ u 1�'•, S J r7 " , RI @ r r' MARS Ay S \ 9 < III C �; " - I y �A ��y �•q, ?v, �4`d�� vtl rr��r '-1','. ,s�u A wit��P,.....unklemt-EirLi�! ~ i e' ill -t _ W.pt" s la IV y '' 1. YIItIANS r + 1 Hats AV '''"a 1 y 5.a $ © NOSN39�� © \' S --. OC ILL Ay S a �'�A• S v. '. ' .: `�� -. ,�` „� S .. y®1:/�j' �� , Ip11N AY^ SSE _ _ i/ Ay `may ..,9� CEDAR AY SE `„, at 11111110 Ear N � \., \1" nm/�rr.rli 2 lo_s � =X _.115TH_. Ay 1=_so "' -- bb 8 ,o�� • {{�''{'R-1���� i �1�,r.1 r�si',a' p r`•.; �,`,�'�• ]6STN AA-��E ,.' ;•S arm- AY 5 3110 `•�\'�'' ' �"'=i? - �j 7 z 660 5 Dv i �' , "T NM� '•''rlht u:l '` N " • "' �' 1: vy a . _ JW(ES Ar-5 03 I A•• -'.'gi'pi, • . ` -,`� � ';1t W O• IOYM Av sE i�,AV :f 1 Iv,.,, SE n .-_• - i ;i.Sm ,..,.•+•.: ;';is :Y:fEiv c.. ":. I�CM, pf.. ..,_„1_, st , '•• �e$ �S;nr AM lOOTx AV SE 1; /t q.. p• ,j+R 'x i'•!•'a U .'4a pp :) \ �.. `••.• "a MIDI ^sc ,y n stk S WIG AV SE .. P. 4".y ,, .r:r ,•^`'r ` �` .— ' ..•. ,,, :, E9 ry v M PS rn '^ Ile ^ i�11�111 �Ay SE 113N AV SE 1 ..Wr r•,'� t t7•st[.. Y. ` i ;z�4{tti�i�' /. a m, 't7 �sr V. --11 _ k ,,. '•- A,pr lttt 'm 1 •i1V ii•r., h' Ge• _ r•. CD •em s[ S _I S 8111T ,.,C_wit AY SE I k 4r O , ". A [ �, y!• t `QI`•' :.r J V �• l 1 -; 1I1151 AvsEN p 1 N"� F ucoo „G3"1 co IIIIN AV Sr, 1WOO : . ,; AV q ¢I' : ( T� � I IB1N am, a " I..I.i6M5j, q\ti fynl [},i' 1 71N-4Y 5 t kJ� v,'/! r�. tt\ .,. I • t,. 3 %� a h }ry AY SE `.- '_a' •s ,.,N & + a ,t - c :.; DHOWS' �BPAY • �1 ��s ,s�e X _� �t 5 ...Alt rn g ��+� 4 51fE" sil.•F' =r N N L1 li,, J - 'J - . T "'e`B 1�' 41 97NAYSE ,4� y,• ,� °)y ''tC ii'j t. ,T'�«ry•+hi�� .. ,'"• ., ik y�lmitgpri,� �` �. v hIC, Av 5E_.. AvIZSDAl, :4',/,..mi.X /�,,m,,, „.120TI1 ' A SE ��' ' F. 3'� ,.:-,,,,...,4'' yeai:.yet.-......,„ix �..:.a� C I El �el ' :r�\, z tv a1NX J.., 1,T" ,-„1Z NR ,.Y+t^ 'f'„1` v s. G] ct 3F apt» l •aS/� z..., a �t >, ; :� v n a rlr i a.j;. Kr a 1 _ Rl /' I, 4• Eh',$ ', ;,9 I ! AY_ SE ter{ ii �� .:r ' . ly C .i t 5.; y , h� _� , om p4. �, . 1 sCb iM rr X Yi 1'f�4S ;j�Q��~ .i,• '$9ç �S " 17`'. ,i '. • } :-. . lean m' n• O , .. u�-�q, ti �«q SW"�55 x ua ,« ii2 • AY 75 • ' tT tj; �ii'' .,A • `4 � 1;' « 'r,y NE . II /'i ...* r 1ntN E_ .r �-,le1g °� °,p lh I IN 'a AY~ta i .-, 3 1.•.+1.. -,•- r -• • y .. ev. y te&q -H---I.ItlO Ihnr,....'„, , ty'�',: .,N. ,« 6 ,'k ',.`ta;t 4 A;, 4,EI,.. I,"� , vj�j ,y t:I.1 ,v'! • .'A:- r«. IV Do R in,« . i. Yr.b 7 p ` "- . 1-: 'I. ,, �Et':f ', 0I•,.i:.4:.i•: - 3.+. ., ^f r_ m N »�,..1�d .SeT`alx slYla:r i�elTtr/ L�':} ;z;::'. r 1 AI a @ EL) • Cedar River Terrace property(residential aprtments) • ._2,,:foot high concrete wall • • 1 storage shed :(gasorne) jgasoltne/� • .i —�' r\ Canber Corps office (73 Burnett Ave.S.) • shed B- rosene)'� \\\ approximate interpreted locality • _ of 19,340-gallon capacity above ground storage tanks • +B2 i : • • 1 41 I — - -- lk newer asphalt CD older asphalt h ' is• 1 -,y'4 o' )"3 * w • c O CD Canber Corps warehouse C `° (repairs,painting,remodeling, concrete french "'N., �j ^ landscaping,etc.) patches(former 4013-3 1 c i product piping?) z [former garage] if -.. . B-4 oncrete p•ds F..] ''''... (forme el disp•nser area) o �.. • • Canber Corps warehouse a • (repairs,painting,remodeling, ua landscaping,etc.) o • • [former barrel platform] • 3 • i — _ .__....._._.....__._._.._.._.._.__......__.._...._...._..._........ fence i • • D.S.Purcell Painting,Inc. d • • warehouse ° • (75 Barnette Ave.S.) oinferred shallow [former warehouse] " groundwater flow direction =Approximate limits of subject property. NORTH B-;-(fj- =Approximate location of Strataprobe boring by EAT on 8-27-99. Scale: finch=20 feet i TT I, ENVIRONMENTAL SITE EXPLORATION MAP ASSOCIATES, INC. Commercial Property • '� • Q • 73-77 Burnett Avenue South J —'--' 2122-112thAvenueN.E.,Ste B-100 Renton,Washington Bellevue,Washington98004r .:' Job Number: Date: Plate: Logged by: v JN 9319 Sept. 1999 2 • BORING B-1 voc Sample Interval/ Temporary Approximate Head-spacc number Well Water Table uscs DESCRIPTION Analysis(ppm) 0 ' Suface:asphalt. FLFILL:Sand with silt,brown,fine-to-medium grained,moist. 0 2, m * .r.n. . concrete slab,3"-4"thick �a ::+Silty sand/sandy silt,fine,gray,petroleum odors noted,roots present. a 220 on @ 4' �' 5, 9 =I. 960 k, B-I '' Alternating layers of fine gray silty sand and fine gray sandy silt,moist, 2100 @ T . strong petroleum odors. B-1 .i @ 9' 420 10'" f @ 12' =y d , ' ,21 Sand becomes fine-to-medium grained,very moist. 0 i g II u j Gravelly sand,wet,gray,orange mottling(iron oxide)present,no petroleum odors. B-I = ' 1 �1 0 i @ 14' _.3 - .,� 15' • * Strataprobe boring terminated at 15.0 feet on 8-27-99. * Groundwater encountered at approximately 14 feet below the ground surface. * TIC headspace analysis measured using Photovac PID volatile organic compound vapor monitor. 4- ENVIRONMENTAL STRATAPROBE BORING LOG -' _ ASSOCIATES, INC. Commercial Property ='� 73- 77 Burnett Avenue Southenton,Washington r — —'�' 2122-112th Avenue N.E.,Ste.B-100 R Bellevue,Washington 98004 '•''' : Job Number: Date: Logged by: Plate: JN 9319 Sept 1999 JRR 3 BORING B-2 Sample VOC lmavall Temporary Approximate Head-space number vial water Table USCS DESCRIPTION Analysis(ppm) 0 Suface:asphalt. FLFILL:Sand with silt,brown,fine-to-medium grained,moist. [-2 2, eD .....�,concrete slab,3"-4"thick. ' Silty sand/sandy silt,fine,gray,petroleum odors noted,roots present. 20 jJ '2 • 60 4'51 -2 210 @ 6' ^• Alternating layers of fine gray silty sand and fine gray sandy silt,moist, 7�1f __ strong petroleum odors. B-2 kR• • a 120 r$'lot 1o. ,• • -••• 40 I. 112' ••. ' r, Sand becomes fine-to-medium grained,very moist. V. . . U B 2 = 0 Gravelly sand,wet,gray,orange mottling(iron oxide)present,no petroleum odors. 0 15'f...!14' 3 • * Strataprobe boring terminated at 15.0 feet on 8-27-99. * Groundwater encountered at approximately 14 feet below the ground surface. * HC headspace analysis measured using Photovac MD volatile organic compound vapor monitor. ENVIRONMENTAL BORING LOG ASSOCIATES, INC. Commercial Property '�' - 73- 77 Burnett Avenue South t -" —l' ' 2122-112th Avenue N.E.,Ste.B-100 Renton,Washington - tt Bellevue,Washington 98004 . Job Number: Date: Plate: Logged by: JN 9319 Sept 1999 JRR 4 . BORING B-3 VOC Sample lnwv&U Temporary Approximate Head-space number Well Weser Table USCS_ DESCRIPTION Analysis(ppm) 0 - Suface:asphalt. FL FILL:Sand with silt,brown,fine-to-medium grained,moist. B-3 0 @ 2' • • a� Silty sand/sandy silt,fine,brown,roots present,moist. o 5' .' .• • B-3 • ' • @ 6' .4. ') Alternating layers of fine brown silty sand and fine brown sandy-silt,moist. a B-3 i�r @8' 0 10' `-3 0 @ ..J g_3 •. . - Ca312' .�Sand becomes fine-to-medium grained,gray,very moist. 0 @ 14' d V. ,- ' Gravelly sand,wet,medium-to-coarse grained,gray, no petroleum odors. 0 15' 3 .. • .1 * Strataprobe boring terminated at 15.0 feet on 8-27-99. * Groundwater encountered at approximately 14 feet below the ground surface. * HC headspace analysis measured using Photovac PID volatile organic compound vapor monitor. ENVIRONMENTAL BORING LOG ASSOCIATES, INC. Commercial Property �• '� A. 73-77 Burnett Avenue South • -- `�' 2122-112th Avenue N.E.,Ste.B-100 Renton Washington ,� Bellevue,Washington 98009 � , Job Number: Date: Logged by: Plate: JN 9319 Sept. 1999 JRR 5 BORING B-4 I San,.. VOC Interval/ Temporary Approximate Head-space number Well water Table USCS DESCRIPTION Analysis(ppm) 0 Suface:asphalt iFL FILL:Sand with silt,brown,fine-to-medium grained,moist. B-4@2 •,Ii.l o - - I Silty sand/sandy silt,fine,:brown,roots present,moist. • ®4 b - I, 0 B-4 o @6' i ,, ttifj.--: :-: . .I'� Alternating layers of fine brown silty sand and fine brown sandy silt,moist. il 10' `4 @10' • r�1soil turns gray colored 10 B a 1-11 ®IT - . ;' .01 Sand becomes fine-to-medium grained,gray,very moist,petroleum odor noted. 380 IF S'W B4 Gravellysand,wet,medium-to-coarsegrained, @ 14' ;, - gray, no petroleum odors. 0 15t 3 • 1 I i 6 * Strataprobe boring terminated at 15.0 feet on 8-27-99. * Groundwater encountered at approximately 14 feet below the ground surface. * HC headspace analysis measured using Photovac PID volatile organic compound vapor monitor. i , _+ ENVIRONMENTALSTRATAPROBE BORING LOG -�=` ASSOCIATES, INC. Commercial Property -' 1 - 73-77 Burnett Avenue South r — —;`' 2122-112th Avenue N.E.,Ste.B-100 Renton,Washington i _� Bellevue,Washington 98004 �� Job Number: Date: Logged by: Plate: JN 9319 Sept. 1999 JRR 6 APPENDIX Laboratory Report TRANSGLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL GEOSCIENCES NORTHWEST, INC. 800 Sleater-Kinney SE,PMB #262 Lacey,Washington 98503-1127 Mobile Environmental Laboratories Telephone: 360-459-4670 Environmental Sampling Services Fax: 360-459-3432 September 7, 1999 COPy Jim Ruef = ' ,Q Environmental AssociatestilSO 2122 112th Ave. NE, Suite B-100 Bellevue,WA 98004 Dear Mr. Ruef: Please find enclosed the analytical data report for the Renton Project in Renton, Washington. Soil and water samples were analyzed for Diesel and Oil by NWTPH- Dx/Dx Extended, Gasoline by NWTPH-Gx and BTEX by Method 8021B on August 30, 1999. The results of these analyses are summarized in the attached table. All soil values are reported on a dry weight basis. Applicable detection limits and QA/QC data are included. An invoice for this analytical work is also enclosed for your records. 1 TEG Northwest appreciates the opportunity to have provided analytical services to Environmental Associates for this project. If you have any further questions about the data report,please give me a call. It was a pleasure working with you on this project, and we are looking forward to the next opportunity to work together. Sincerely, .73/t(TOOCe--0 Michael A.Korosec President 1 OA/OC FOR ANALYTICAL METHODS GENERAL The TEG Northwest Laboratory quality assurance and quality control(QA/QC)procedures are conducted following the guidelines and objectives which meet or exceed certification/-accreditation requirements of California DOHS, Washington DOE, and Oregon DEQ. The Quality Control Program is a consistent set of procedures which assures data quality through the use of appropriate blanks, replicate analyses, surrogate spikes, and matrix spikes,and with the use of reference standards that meet or exceed EPA standards. When analyses are taking place on-site with the mobile lab,the need for Field Blanks or Travel/Trip Blanks is eliminated. If there is going to be a delay before sample preparation for analysis, the sample is stored at 4° C. ANALYTICAL METHODS TEG Northwest Labs use analytical methodologies which are in conformity with U. S. Environmental Protection Agency(EPA), Washington DOE, and Oregon DEQ methodologies. When necessary and appropriate due to the nature or composition of the sample,TEG may use variations of the methods which are consistent with recognized standards or variations used by the industry and government laboratories. TPH-Gasoline,TPH Diesel (Gasoline and/or Diesel, Modified EPA 8015,NWTPH-Gx and NWTPH-Dx) A check standard is run at the beginning of the day. 1) A close standard is run at the end of the day. 2) Both open and close standards must be within 15% of the continuing calibration curve value. All samples are prepared with a surrogate spike, and the recovery must be between 65% and 135% unless high sample concentrations interfere with the determination of the recovery percentage. A duplicate sample is run at a rate of 1 per 10 samples. At least 1 method blank is run per 20 samples analyzed. i Purgeable Volatile Aromatics (BTEX, EPA 80211B) A check standard is run at the beginning of the day. The check standard is run at the end of the day. Both open and close standards must be within 15% of the continuing calibration curve value. All samples are prepared with a surrogate spike, and the recovery must be between 65% and 135%unless high sample concentrations interfere with the determination of the recovery percentage. At least 1 method blank is run per day. • I 3 1 ITEG NW SEATTLE CHEMISTRY LABORATORY (425)957-9872,fax(425)957-9904 TEG Job Number: S90830-1 Client: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES Client Job Name: RENTON Client Job Number: S90830-1 Analytical Results NWTPH-Gx/BTEX MTH BLK LCS B-I @7' B-2 @6' B-3 @8' Matrix - Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Date extracted' Reporting 08/30/99 08/30/99 08/30/99 08/30/99 08/30/99 Date analyzed Limits 08/30/99 08/30/99 08/30/99 08/30/99 08/30/99 Moisture,% 24% 33% 31% NWTPH-Gx,mq/kq • * Mineral spirits/Stoddard solvent 5.0 nd nd nd nd Gasoline 5.0 nd 4,900 470 nd BTEX, uq!kol Benzene 50 nd 76% 460 nd nd Toluene 50 nd 77% 2,600 500 nd 1 Ethylbenzene 50 nd 23,000 1,200 nd 1 Xylenes 50 nd 75,000 4,200 rid Surrogate recoveries: Trifluorotoluene 106% 95% C C 126% Bromofluorobenzene 103% 92% C C 106% "-KEROSENE FRACTION IN GASOLINE RANGE Data Qualifiers and Analytical Comments nd-not detected at listed reporting limits na-not analyzed C-coelution with sample peaks M-matrix interference J-estimated value Results reported on dry-weight basis Acceptable Recovery limits:65%TO 135% Acceptable RPD limit 35% Page 1 of 2 TEG NW SEATTLE CHEMISTRY LABORATORY (425)957-9872,fax(425)957-9904 TEG Job Number. S90830-1 Client: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES Client Job Name: RENTON Client Job Number: 890830-1 Analytical Results MS MSD RPD NWTPH-Gx/BTEX B-3 @8' 8-3 a@8' 8-3 t8' B-4 @12' Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Date extracted Reporting 08/30/99 08/30/99 08/30/99 08/30/99 Date analyzed Limits 08/30/99 08/30/99 08/30/99 08/30/99 Moisture,% 31% 31% 21% NWTPH-Gx,mq/kq Mineral spirits/Stoddard solvent 5.0 nd Gasoline 5.0 1,300 BTEX,pglkq Benzene 50 76% 74% 2% nd Toluene 50 76% 89% 16% 1,200 Ethylbenzene 50 180 Xylenes 50 2,900 Surrogate recoveries: Trifluorotoluene 93% 89% 95% Bromofluorobenzene 94% 94% 85% *-KEROSENE FRACTION IN GASOLINE RANGE Data Qualifiers and Analytical Comments nd-not detected at listed reporting limits na-not analyzed C-coelution with sample peaks M-matrix interference J-estimated value Results reported on dry-weight basis Acceptable Recovery limits:65%TO 135% Acceptable RPD limit:35% Page 2 of 2 jTEG NW SEATTLE CHEMISTRY LABORATORY (425)957-9872,fax(425)957-9904 J TEG Job Number. S90830-1 Client: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES Client Job Name: RENTON Client Job Number: 590830-1 Printed: 9/3/99 15:40 I Analytical Results NWTPH-Gx/BTEX MTH BLK LCS B-4 GW B-2 GW B-3 GW Matrix Water Water Water Water Water Water Date extracted Reporting 08/30/99 08/30/99 08/30/99 08/30/99 08/30/99 Date analyzed Limits 08/30/99 08/30/99 08/30/99 08/30/99 08/30/99 NWTPH-Gx, mq/L I Mineral spirits/Stoddard solvent 0.10 nd nd nd nd Gasoline 0.10 nd 0.51 0.23 nd BTEX,uq/L Benzene 1.0 nd 76% rid nd rid Toluene 1.0 rid 77% nd nd nd Ethylbenzene 1.0 nd 2.9 nd nd iXylenes 1.0 nd 9.8 nd nd Surrogate recoveries: Trifluorotoluene 106% 95% 106% 89% 98% Bromofluorobenzene 103% 92% 111% 96% 96% Data Qualifiers and Analytical Comments nd-not detected at listed reporting limits na-not analyzed C-coelution with sample peaks E M-matrix interference iJ-estimated value Acceptable Recovery limits:65%TO 135% Acceptable RPD limit:35% F q, I 1 1 i I Page 1 of 3 TEG NW SEATTLE CHEMISTRY LABORATORY (425)957-9872,fax(425)957-9904 TEG Job Number: S90830-1 Client: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES Client Job Name: RENTON I Client Job Number: S90830-1 Printed: 9/3/9915:40 1 Analytical Results MS MSD RPD DUPL NWTPH-Gx/BTEX B-3 GW B-3 GW B-3 GW B-4 GW B-4 GW Matrix - Water Water Water Water Water Water Date extracted Reporting 08/30/99 08/30/99 08/30/99 08/30/99 08/30/99 Date analyzed Limits 08/30/99 08/30/99 08/30/99 08/30/99 08/30/99 NWTPH-Gx,mq/L 1 Mineral spirits/Stoddard solvent 0.10 nd nd Gasoline 0.1 Q 0.75 0.72 I BTEX,uq/L Benzene 1.0 74% 78% 5% 12 11 Toluene 1.0 74% 80% 8% 1.3 1.3 Ethylbenzene 1.0 nd nd Xylenes 1.0 nd nd Surrogate recoveries: Trifluorotoluene 96% 87% 110% 102% Bromofluorobenzene 89% 85% 9B% 88% I Data Qualifiers and Analytical Comments nd-not detected at listed reporting limits na-not analyzed C-coelution with sample peaks M-matrix interference • J-estimated value Acceptable Recovery limits:65%TO 135% Acceptable RPD limit:35% °i g I I I 1 I 1 Page 2 of 3 TEG NW SEATTLE CHEMISTRY LABORATORY (425)957-9872,fax(425)957-9904 • TEG Job Number. 590830-1 I Client: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES Client Job Name: RENTON Client Job Number: S90830-1 Printed: 9/3/9915:40 Analytical Results RPD NWTPH-Gx/BTEX B-4 GW Matrix Water Water • Date extracted Reporting 08/30/99 Date analyzed Limits 08/30/99 NWTPH-Gx, mglL Mineral spirits/Stoddard solvent 0.10 Gasoline 0.10 4% BTEX, pq/L Benzene 1.0 12% Toluene 1.0 00,E Ethylbenzene 1.0 Xylenes 1.0 Surrogate recoveries: Trifluorotoluene Bromofluorobenzene Data Qualifiers and Analytical Comments nd-not detected at listed repotting limits na-not analyzed C-coelution with sample peaks • M-matrix interference J-estimated value Acceptable Recovery limits:65%TO 135% Acceptable RPD limit:35% Page 3 of 3 I , , 1 TEG NW SEATTLE CHEMISTRY LABORATORY (425)957-9872,fax(425)957-9904 TEG Job Number: S90830-1 J Client: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES Client Job Name: RENTON IClient Job Number: S90830-1 IAnalytical Results NWTPH-Dx; mg/kg MTH BLK B-1 @7' B-2 @6' B-3 @8` B-4 @12' Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Date extracted Reporting 08/30/99 08/30/99 08/30/99 08/30/99 08/30/99 Date analyzed Limits 08/30/99 08/30/99 08/30/99 08/30/99 08/30/99 Moisture,% 24% 33% 31% 21% I Kerosene/Jet tuel 20 nd 9,700 550 nd 1,500 Diesel/Fuel oil 20 nd 4,100 480 nd nd Heavy oil 50 nd rid nd nd nd ISurrogate recoveries: Fluorobiphenyl 102% 116% 107% 105% 111% o-Terphenyl 100% 111% 104% 103% 103% i Data Qualifiers and Analytical Comments nd-not detected at listed reporting limits na-not analyzed C-coelution with sample peaks M-matrix interference I J-estimated value Results reported on dry-weight basis Acceptable Recovery limits:65%TO 135% Acceptable RAD limit:35% i t 1 I I Page 1 of 2 • TEG NW SEATTLE CHEMISTRY LABORATORY (425)957-9872,fax(425)957-9904 TEG Job Number. S90830-1 Client: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES Client Job Name: RENTON Client Job Number. S90830-1 Analytical Results DUPL RPD NWTPH-Dx; mg/kg B-4 @12' B-4 c12' Matrix Soil Soil Soil Date extracted Reporting 08/30/99 08/30/99 Date analyzed Limits 08130/99 08/30/99 Moisture,% 21% Kerosene/Jet fuel 20 1,500 0% Diesel/Fuel oil 20 nd Heavy oil 50 nd Surrogate recoveries: Fluorobiphenyl 112% o-Terphenyl 104% Data Qualifiers and Analytical Comments nd-not detected at listed reporting limits na-not analyzed C-coelution with sample peaks M-matrix interference J-estimated value Results reported on dry-weight basis Acceptable Recovery limits:65%TO 135% Acceptable RPD limit:35% • Page 2 of 2 1' , . 1 TEG NW SEATTLE CHEMISTRY LABORATORY (425)957-9872,fax(425)957-9904 1 TEG Job Number. S90830-1 Client: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES Client Job Name: RENTON Client Job Number. S90830-1 1 Analytical Results NWTPH-Dx; mg/I MTH BLK B-1 GW B-2 GW B-3 GW B-4 GW Matrix Water Water Water Water Water Water Date extracted Reporting 08/30/99 08/30/99 08/30/99 08/30/99 08/30/99 Date analyzed Limits 08/30/99 08/30/99 08/30/99 08/30/99 08/30/99 Kerosene/Jet fuel 0.20 nd nd nd nd rid I Diesel/Fuel oil 0.20 nd rid nd rid nd Heavy oil 0.50 nd nd nd nd nd Surrogate recoveries: iFluorobiphenyl 98% 106% 105% 105% 106% o-Terphenyl 98% 104% 102% 103% 102% iData qualifiers and Analytical Comments nd-not detected at listed reporting limits na-not analyzed C-coelution with sample peaks M-matrix interference J-estimated value Acceptable Recovery limits:65%TO 135% IAcceptable RPD limit:35% I Page 1 of 2 • TEG NW SEATTLE CHEMISTRY LABORATORY (425)957-9872,fax(425)957-9904 TEG Job Number: 590830-1 Client: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES Client Job Name: RENTON Client Job Number. S90830-1 Analytical Results DUPL NWTPH-Dx;mg/I B-4 GVV Matrix Water Water Date extracted Reporting 08/30/99 Date analyzed Limits 08/30/99 Kerosene/Jet fuel 0.20 nd Diesel/Fuel oil 0.20 nd Heavy oil 0.50 nd Surrogate recoveries: Fluorobiphenyl 106% o-Terphenyl 104% Data Qualifiers and Analytical Comments nd-not detected at listed reporting limits na-not analyzed C-coelution with sample peaks M-matrix Interference J-estimated value Acceptable Recovery limits:65%TO 135% Acceptable RPD limit:35% Page 2 of 2 m. _- -r 1 iy5c Lub/AL `J 77(7 ...wig CFI A f O f -V U o V I it Eo ot _ .. Le ('� ENVIRONMENTAL , . J GEOSCIENCES CLIENT: ___ k LV.•r-c,,y, t..e_ .i A444C r...,.} Tyt-0 - DATE: . 30 •99 PAGE 1 OF I 1 ADDRESS: 7 1 22- 1)2 }-t= ji\vp 4 E 1 ae b- )Co) 60 i 10 v,ao `I c..76 L-).- PROJECT NAME: I pa..-4-c,.`_ PHONE ( 14- c) I 4 SS- 962S- FAX: ( 47_S) 14S - 7 3lca LOCATION: 77 St�Yvl$7 1 e Ave . S . CLIENT PROJECT #: 'JN 9 3 )9 PROJECT MANAGER:kJTM iQt,E F COLLECTOR: .7./it.-1IQ UFF- CDATE OF OLLECTION a.Z7.99 Sample P 0 ; a s. Q° °~ ��¢ 9 ? v c457 � z c C. o Sample Number Depth Time Type Container T e a°P oP o� �`� Q� Q� ¢r Qr �� �� ¢� o�� Z ��� =° U xi Yp - 5 e a Q ¢ o a , FIELD NOTES T°- `o 3 z a-L (J — O1 Q 1n/ VoAs/Sm [ '1 1C + 6-ZJ — 1635" v/ k 3 R)- 3 ��/ — I t 15 vs/ ' v. _ 3 \if 1593.., S y r, `it 1 i 3-2. P 7' �' 1ai7 _ S , �� _ X I ,0)- 3 P 5i ' cg , IoS7 5 Y Y. - - 1 t. - ' P ji! IV )156 5 X X _ 1 _ _' ELINQUISHED BY(Signature) DATE/TIME i RECEIVED BY (S ture) DATE/TIME l5- SAMPLE RECEIPT LABORATORY NOTES: , �+^-��� g'3D 99 ®ADM '; / p g+ AL NUMBER OF CONTAINERS TD,75Ek QUISHED BY(Sigatur ) DATE/TIME , RECEIVED• (Signature) DAT / CHAIN OF CUSTODY SEALS Y/N/NA SEALS INTACT?Y/NMA SAMPLE DISPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS RECEIVED GOOD COND./COLD - AEG DISPOSAL 0$2.00 each 0 Return 0 Pickup NOTES: op- 1 1 i PLL C A HARK EY Architects H M S T o :_:»:::«:-ryu: -::Egiii:>:::;::>;:::::::::::iniiiiEEi gi::>:k::>_>_:::::;<:.>:::>_::::::>:;>::<ai 13400 Northup Way East,Suite 30 IMEMEMO - - 98005 Bellevue,WA w i CYiiC ii�':•i::':iii:'i iiYi iiiii:??:: Date /" '5 rek 5, c2O' If enclosures are not as noted,please To Gj fy Af 14fjor t PPIJt1oonipdt 5ervfrp5 Div,srort, inform us immediately ATTN 51-five, Tit yt pr If checked below,please: Project e7 I �� El Acknowledge receipt of enclosures. Name 5 �ne: ❑Return enclosures to us. Project# f - 7 - F • WE TRANSMIT: CITY OF RENTON herewith ❑ under separate cover via •❑ in accordance with your request MAR 0 5 2001 FOR YOUR: . bU LLI/11lt't7.4 LIVISION V.Lapproval 0 distribution to parties 0 information 0 record Ull review&comment 0 use ❑ other THE FOLLOWING: Drawings 0 Shop Drawing Prints 0 Shop Drawing Reproducible ��❑r Change Order 0 Specifications 0 Product Literature Samples Ja`Other COPIES DATE REV.NO. DESCRIPTION ACTION CODE Ir".yf Aitelw a l adrPts -4or r .41.4 Fttserney l-s I 38 0) 12tvtselt P epode14- P® usiy t ly v, c,,Ih I spiel Revise, Pro)Pcf"Ns(Y41I,' I 31901 gtrsto1+se f-0 Nobte A I'ci2,S„a0o! a2 • 3 f i/o j Rftsef 4 d,►,AM)42414J 4?;) 42.2a jA2,2h ACTION A. Action indica on item transmitted D. For signature and forwarding as noted below under REMARKS CODE B. No action req ed E. See REMARKS below C. For signature d return to this office REMARKS: . A-2I31f)/r2.36, A-2.+4)A246) A2.54,#42.56,A1'.1, A5 22A .3 If Cot'ILO/L1,2,L1.3.,L1.f I ear/ 3/1/o1 04- 1.4nihrea t, e'rAwitys edit I 61er 130et1i • COPIES TO: (with enclosures) ❑ + 1 ❑ _ '.F F�f-�l( )r=:7 I ei r-i rr. BY: _. _ 1 p 1 Transmits l Memo 2000 `""' // 11.00 THOMASAHARKEY Architects March 1,2001 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON .MAR 052 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works C i 1055 S. Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 Re: 95 Burnett Project Number: LUA-00-171,SA-H,ECF Response to Notice Dated February 5,2001 13400 Northup Way Suite 30 Bellevue,WA Dear Steve Taylor: 98005 The following is a response to the City of Renton Economic Development Neighborhoods T 425.401.6828 & Strategic Planning Memorandum dated February 5, 2001 regarding the above-mentioned F 425.401.0630 project. The comments are addressed item by item below in response format;please refer to the original memorandum for clarification. A. Building Siting and Design 1. Pedestrian Building Entries The auto court is a pedestrian zone demarcated with paving patterns, color, texture, and raised pedestrian crossing areas which also act as speed bumps designed to slow auto traffic. This will create an environment where the driver feels he is in a pedestrian zone instead of the pedestrian feeling as though he is in an area dedicated to autos. To further emphasize the pedestrian nature of this auto court we have added arbors over the garage entries so that vines can grow up alongside and over the garage doors. This will demphasize the garage entries. The main building entry is promenently emphasized with a colonnade and paving patterns in the auto court. To emphasize it even further we will make the canopy at the front doors larger. The canopy is already planned to be constructed of steel as suggested. 2. Transition to Surrounding Development No changes anticipated to be made as a result of this comment • 200019_corr_juris_siteplan-correct.doc B.Parking,Access and Circulation 1. Location of Parking NA 2. Design of Surface Parking Lighting within the parking garage will be shielded so as to not create glare in the park or on Burnett Avenue South. 3. Structures/Garage Parking Arbors can be utilized to further demphasize the garage doors as discussed above. The building has been pushed back 2' from the Burnett Avenue right of way. There will now be a landscape strip here that will vary between 2' and 4' in width. The long niche at each of building "A" and building`B" has been broken up into three niches of 28'-8" in length spread across the street level facade at each of the buildings. 4. Vehicular Access The only access to this site is off the main street (Burnett Avenue). We have minimized the impact of the garage entries required to be off this right of way by creating the auto court, which buffers the garage entries from the street. The auto court will be pedestrian in nature as discussed above with extensive paving patterns and color being incorporated, which will slow traffic. We investigated the idea of one way circulation into and out of the garage by providing garage doors directly onto Burnett at the far North and South ends of the building. These additional garage doors conflict with the requirement in the Urban Center Design Overlay District Guidelines that states "..,where possible, minimize the number of driveways and curb-cuts". The curb cuts also interrupt the screening of the parking garage. In addition the extra exit points impact the number of parking stalls that can be provided in the garage. With the 2' that is being taken out of the parking garage width to accommodate the planting strip along Burnett Avenue the garage is now at the minimum size required to accommodate the number of parking stalls necessary to support the project. 5. Pedestrian Circulation See response to comments above which address the pedestrian nature of the auto court. C. Landscaping/Recreation/Common Space 1. Common Open Space It was our understanding in early discussions with the city concerning this project that the park that abuts the West side of the site is an important link from the downtown core to the river walk along the Cedar River. The development of the river walk is urban in nature and thus more urban development of the adjacent park link was seen as appropriate. This project is an opportunity for the trade-off of the 200019_corr_juris_siteplan-correct.doc strict requirement of open space to be provided on site in turn for having private assistance in improving the city's link to the river walk. D. Building Architectural Design 1. Building Character and Massing See the discussion above regarding the building set back and redistribution of the building niches along Burnett. 2. Building Rooflines The suggested trade-off is already partially incorporated. The garage walls are not noted to be concrete but rather CMU. The scale of CMU block is more residential in nature than concrete and a variety of textures can be incorporated with CMU block. Submittal of a mock-up for the proposed screening at the garage openings will follow. 3. Building Materials A color and materials sample board is provided with this response. Sincerely, 744- ja Thomas/Ha ey Architects,PLLC Kent Smutny,Manager / 200019_corr_juris_siteplan-correct.doc `N THOMASAHARKEY Architects March 1, 2001 V iLOPME T PLANN . • CrFY OF RENTON MAR 5 2du Development Services Division RFCEVED) 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 Re: Project Narrative for Site Plan Approval Submittal for 95 Burnett Project 13400 Northup Way PROJECT LOCATION / EXISTING CONDITIONS Suite 30 Bellevue,WA The proposed 95 Burnett Building is located at 95 Burnett Ave. S. The project site is 98005 bounded by Burnett Avenue South on the east, by a city park and Burnett Place T 425.401.6828 South on the west, by single-family structures and garages to the south and by a F 425.401.0630 multi-family retirement building to the north. The site is currently occupied by the Lande Feed Mill and other small commercial uses in downtown Renton within the Commercial Downtown zone (CD). The site is nearly flat and currently almost completely impervious. All parcels adjacent to the site are also in the CD zone. The site is approximately 56,557sf(1.298 acres). PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The project will include the demolition of the Lande Feed Mill and the other small commercial buildings on the site and the construction of a four-story apartment structure. The first floor of the building will contain structured parking with 164 stalls. In addition,the project will include the addition of hardscape to the adjacent park in order to provide a focal point. Also a pedestrian connection between the park and Burnett Avenue South will be created. PARKING Parking will be provided within the structure at the street level. The parking will be broken into two garages. The north garage will have 81 stalls and the south garage will have 83 stalls. There will be an auto court and the main building entry between the two garages. The auto court will be accessed near the center of the site off Burnett Ave. South. 9 901 7_corresp_consult_j uris_200019_Corr Juris_03-01-01.doc RESIDENTIAL The upper three levels will be developed as two separate buildings and will contain exclusively residential uses with a total of 118 apartment units. These units are flats ranging in size from 483sf studios to 1053sf two bedroom two bath units. The majority of the units will be one bedroom one bath. A Landscaped courtyard is proposed at the first residential level above the main building entry lobby and common area. The residential floors will be accessed from the lobby which in turn is accessed off the auto court on the east side of the building. STREET IMPROVEMENTS Street improvements will be to the centerline of Burnett Avenue South. Along the west side of Burnett Avenue South this will include the construction of curb, gutter and sidewalk and landscape strip. STATISTICS Total lot coverage at grade: 83.5% Total area of parking 42,713sf Total open space provided 5000sf Total area of residential 103,440sf Estimated Construction Cost $5,870,500. Estimated Fair Market Value $11,210,000. Estimated Quantity of Excavation minimal, building contains no basement Average height of building at parapet 42' Sinc ely, Thomas Hat ey Architects,PLLC Kent Smutny, Manager 99017_corresp_consult_juris_200019_Corr Juris_03-01-01.doc THOMASAHARKEY Architects DEVELOratl_GZ[�T CITY OF RE March 1, 2001 MAR ,0 e Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 Re: Response to Attached Housing Design Guidelines for 95 Burnett Project The following is a summary of the Renton Attached Housing Design Guidelines 13400 Northup Way with respective responses as relate to the proposed design: Suite 30 Bellevue,WA A. BUILDING SITING AND DESIGN 98005 T 425.401.6828 1. Pedestrian Building Entries: This standard requires buildings to be orientated to the street with the primary F 425.401.0630 building entrance prominently located on the facade facing the street. The main entry to the proposed apartment building faces Burnett, the primary street that the project faces. The entry is located off a central courtyard and is marked with a canopy and unique, prominent architectural treatment to the elevation at that location. The entire form of the building at this location reinforces the entry architecture. The entry to parking is located off to the sides of the central courtyard. This gets the entries to the garage off Burnett and makes them less visible. 2. Transition to Surrounding Development: Careful siting and design treatment is necessary to achieve a compatible transition where new buildings differ from surrounding development in terms of building height, bulk and scale. The proposed development holds the street edge unlike the existing buildings now on the site. The current buildings have parking lots between them and the street edge. To the South of the site are underdeveloped single family lots. To the North is multifamily retirement housing similar in scale to the proposed project. The proposed building is 4 stories, with a maximum height of 50'to the highest ridge. This is much lower than the 95'height limit allowed for this site. In addition the apparent bulk of the project is reduced by breaking the building into two distinct buildings above the first level. Levels 2 through 4 are also set back from the street and further modulated with recesses for decks. . The bulk at the first level is modulated between alternative setbacks from the sidewalk of 2'and 4'and broken by the auto court. 200019_Corr_J uris_03-01-01.doc B. PARKING,ACCESS, CIRCULATION 1. Location of Parking: No parking shall be located between a building and the front property line or the street side yard of a corner lot. All parking is contained within the building. 2. Design of Surface Parking: NA 1. Structure/Garage Parking: Parking entries should not subordinate pedestrian entries and should not dominate the streetscape. Parking at grade shall be completely enclosed within the building or wholly screened. Garage facades should be landscaped or bermed with evergreen landscape materials. Parking garages should be architecturally compatible with the residential portion of the building. Garage parking should be secured. The street side of parking in the CD zone should incorporate retail or service commercial, facilities or services that can be used by the residents or units that have access from the street. The parking garage entry to the project is located away from Burnett at the sides of the auto court thus making it subordinate from the primary pedestrian entry to the project. The parking at grade will be enclosed with openings that are in filled with a decorative screen pattern. There will be evergreen landscaping between the building and the sidewalk that will vary in width from 2'to 4'. The residential parking is secured with garage doors. As this site is located outside of the central downtown area North of 2"d commercial space has not been incorporated into the proposed project. 2. Vehicular Access: Parking garages should be accessed from side streets. Driveways should be located to be visible from the right of way and not impede pedestrian circulation. Minimize the number of driveways and curb-cuts. The parking garage entries are located off the auto court. .The curb cut for the auto court is the only curb cut provided for cars in the project. Access to the auto court is off Burnett, the primary street, because there is no secondary street adjacent to the site. Pedestrian circulation through the auto court 200019_CorrJuris_03-01-01.doc is directed to the center so as not to conflict with the limited site lines created at the edge of the courtyard by the parking garage doors. 3. Pedestrian Circulation: Developments should include an integrated pedestrian circulation system that connects buildings, open space, and parking areas with the adjacent street sidewalk system. Pedestrian pathways should be delineated separate from vehicle circulation. The entries to the proposed building are located off the auto court and off the adjacent park. The pedestrian circulation from Burnett to the main building entry is defined with textured and colored paving which is raised and d erent from the rest of the auto court. C. LANDSCAPING / RECREATION / COMMON SPACE 1. Common Open Space Attached housing developments of 10 or more dwelling units shall provide a minimum area of common open space or recreation area equal to 50 square feet per unit. This project consists of 118 dwelling units, which would require 5900sf of open space. The proposed project provides 5000sf of open space. We request credit for the remainder of the required open space for providing the proposed improvements noted on the landscape plans to the adjacent park Areas for open space provided include an exercise room, a common gathering space at the building lobby available to all residents. This space could also be made available for scheduling small community related meetings. A common terrace at the first residential level which can be used as an area for social gatherings and a pedestrian connection on the North side of the building that links Burnett Avenue to the adjacent park are also provided as part of the open space requirement. The residential level courtyard has western and eastern exposure and is surrounded by units thus providing surveillance to the open space. D. BUILDING ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN 1. Building Character and Massing All building facades shall include modulation or articulation at intervals of no more than 40'. The proposed building utilises a variety of modulation and articulation. At the street level the building is generally setback 2'from the front property line with step backs of 2'intervals no longer than 40'. A variety of types of textured CMU will be used on the street front elevations. Walls at the garage area along Burnett are broken up with openings, which contain decorative screen material. In addition the length of the building on Burnett is broken down by the auto court near the center of 200019_CorrJ uris_03-01-01.doc the project. Above the street level the building is modulated such that there are no elevations longer than 40'on the street sides. 2. Building Rooflines Building rooflines should be varied by emphasizing dormers, chimneys, stepped roofs,gables,prominent cornice or fascia, or a broken or articulated roofline. . Both flat and sloped roofs are used in the project to break down the scale of the building and create the feeling that the project is a city block made up of several derent buildings. In addition the - sloped portions of the roof on this building are broken up by hip roof forms of various sues. 3. Building Materials: Building exterior finishes should be durable, of high quality, easily maintained and add visual interest and detail. The base of the building is to be constructed with durable materials, textured CMU and concrete. The upper portions of the building use "lighter"appearing materials, vinyl siding and stucco. Sincerely, I 1-11"411 Thomas Harkey Architects, PLLC Kent Smutny, Manager • 200019_Corr. Juris_03-01-01.doc DEJELc 'Aii C°5� 4'P.,,�iki:i'i••. CI YOFRFNiOff? U652OG AGREEMENT FOR EASEMENT FOR PEDESTRIANS,WITH STRUCTURAL OVERHANG This agreement is made this day of March 2001, between P0SK Properties Inc, as("Grantor")and the municipal organization known as the City of Renton, Parks Department,as ("Grantee"). In consideration of$ ,and other good and valuable consideration, receipt which is hereby acknowledged by Grantor,and in consideration of the performance by the Grantor and Grantee of the covenants,terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, Grantor hereby conveys and warrants to Grantee the following Easement; 1. A non-exclusive easement across,along, in, upon and over Grantor's property, consisting of a fifteen(15')foot wide strip of Grantor's property, as more particularly described in attached Exhibit"A"for the purpose of ingress and egress for pedestrians. The easement is not intended to allow pedestrians to loiter along the easement area,but is for their ingress and egress to the park only. Said easement shall not interfere with Grantor's ability to place a structural overhang above and over said easement, as is more particularly described in attached Exhibit"A," Said structural overhang shall not interfere with the purpose and use of said easement, and Grantee acknowledges that said overhang does not presently interfere with Grantee's use of said easement. Grantee's use of said easement shall not interfere with Grantor's use of its building. The easement referred to herein shall run with the land and be pertinent to the land and real property described as an easement across a strip of land fifteen (15')feet wide, running west to east, as more particularly delineated on attached Exhibit"A." The easement shall concern the land legally described as more fully set forth on attached Exhibits"A"and"B," Should the useful life of Grantor's building terminate and it becomes necessary for Grantor or Grantor's successor and assigns to demolish said building, Grantor and Grantee, their successors and assigns agree that said easement can be relocated upon - -- - -- — — mutual agreement to another location upon Grantor's property. Said relocation to be based upon a general standard of reasonableness. 2. The cost of maintaining the easement shall he borne by Grantor. 3. Said easement shall benefit the Grantee herein and all future owners of Grantee's property, 4. Should it become necessary for either party to this agreement,their successors or assigns to enforce any rights contained herein,the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees and costs. EXECUTED as of the date set forth above. Agent for PDSK,Inc. Grantor STATE OF WASHWG'fON ) - : ss COUNTY OF , ) On this day personally appeared before me _ to me known to he the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing Instrument, and acknowledged that she/he signed the same as her/his free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Given under my hand and official seal this day of ,2001. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. residing at _ _. .. My oomnission expires: • city of Renton,Parks Department,Grantee STATE OF WASHINGTON ) : ss COUNTY OF ) On this day personally appears before me _to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing insininent,and.admnwledgged that she/he signed the same as her/his free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Given under my hand and official seal this day of 2001• Notary Public in and for the State of Washinh giott, • Residing at My commission expires: r-RE.'9OPMEN PL IM:\;;;" CITY oFp7�\t;-' AGREEMENT FOR LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE This agreement is made this day of March 2001,between the municipal authority commonly known as the City Renton and PDSK Properties, Inc. In order to maintain a common and esthetically appealing park area. PDSK Properties, Inc. hereby agrees to be responsible for the landscaping maintenance on City of Renton Park property as follows: 1. The City of Renton grants to PDSK Properties,Inc. a perpetual landscape easement over, across and upon the property more particularly described in attached Exhibit"A" for the purpose of building and maintaining the pavers and hardscape which PDSK Properties, Inc. is installing and maintaining on City of Renton property as more particularly described in attached Exhibit "A." 2. CirantsMsements to_Share Responsibilities. PDSK Properties, Inc. .is granted an easement by the City of Renton as upon the property described in attached Exhibit"A"as follows: a. PDSK Properties Inc., shall maintain the pavers and hardscape which it is installing, and the City of Renton grants to it an easement over,above, across and upon the property more particularly described in attached Exhibit"A" for the purposes of carrying out the landscaping maintenance related only to said pavers and install hardscape. The City of Renton shall be responsible for maintaining the remainder of the park property. 3. Said maintenance agreement shall benefit the Grantees herein and all future owners of Grantee's real property. 4. This easement is granted and subject to and conditioned upon the following terms, conditions and covenants,which both parties promise to faithfully observe and perform. a. PDSK Properties,Inc. shall maintain the pavers and hardscape as more particularly described in attached Exhibit"A." The City of Renton shall maintain the remainder of the landscape in the park area. The cost associated with said maintenance, repair, improvement, and/or rebuilding of the pavers and hardscape shall be borne by PDSK Properties,Inc. The cost,maintenance, repair, improvement and rebuilding of the remainder of the park area shall be borne by the City of Renton,these obligations shall endure to the benefits of the respective party's heirs, successors and assigns. • • 5. Should it become necessary for either party to this agreement, their successor or assigns to enliorce any rights contained herein, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees and costs. EXECUTED as of the date set forth above. • Agent for City of Renton ._..... . STATE OF WASI IIN(YION • ) : ss . On this day personally appeared behire me to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that she/he signed the same as her/his free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned Given under my hand and official seal this. day of ,2001. Printed Name:._.._.._...,_..�....�...._ti.,�,.�.�,_..-__._...._..-_... Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. residing at My commission expires: Agent for PDSK Properties, Inc STATE OF WASH IN(YFc)N ) ss COUNTY OF ) On this day personally appeared before me to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that she/he signed the same as her/his free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Given under my hand and official seal this day of . ,2001. Printed Name: . Notary Public in and for the state of Washington. residing at Any commission expires: cirt OF RE1 TON RECEIVED ryq MAR 05 2001 bU06v Arkg.i DIVISION AGREEMENT FOR VERTICAL EASEMENT FOR OVERHANG This agreement is made this day of March 2001, between the municipal corporation known as the City of Renton, ("Grantor")and PDSK Properties, Inc., as Grantee. In consideration of$ • ,and other good and valuable consideration, receipt which is hereby acknowledged by Grantor,and in consideration of the performance by the Grantor and Grantee of the covenants,terms and conditions hereinafter set forth,Grantor hereby conveys and warrants to Grantee the following Easement: I. A non-exclusive,perpetual,vertical easement across,along, above and over Grantor's property,which abuts the east side of Grantee's property,as more particularly described in attached Exhibit"A." Said easement has two(2)locations on the west side of Grantee's property. One location on the north end of the east side and one location on the south end of the east side. The purpose of the easement is to allow the structural overhang of Grantee's building and roof area as more specifically delineated in attached Exhibit"A."The easement referred to herein shall run with land and be pertinent to the land and real property described on Exhibit"B." 2. Said easement shall benefit the Grantee herein and all future owners of Grantee's property, and shall be a burden upon Grantor's property,as more particularly described in attached Exhibit"B." 3. The easement is granted and subjected to and conditioned upon the following terms, conditions and covenants, which Grantee, Grantee's heirs,successor and assigns hereby promise to faithfully and fully observe and perform. Grantee shall maintain the structural overhang within the easement area in a structurally sound condition at all times. 4. It is further agreed that all maintenance,repair, improvement, and/or rebuilding of said structural overhand shall be the obligation and responsibility of Grantee, their heirs, successors and assigns. • • • 5. Should it become necessary for either party to this agreement,their successors or assigns to enforce any to enforce any rights contained herein,the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees and costs. EXECUTED as of the date set forth above. Agent for City of Renton. Grantor • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • : ss COUNTY OF . ) On this day personally appeared before me to me known to be this Individual described in and who executed the within and fo egoing instrwnent.and acknowledged that she/he signed the same as her/his free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and outpaces therein mentioned. . • Given tinder my stand and official seal this day of ,2001 Printed Name: Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. residing at My commission expires; . • City of Renton, Parks Department, Grantor STATE OF WASHINGTON ) : ss COUNTY OF ) On this day.personally appeared beib a me __to me known to • be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that she/he signed the same as bor/hle Ike and voitmtury act and deed far the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Given under my hand and official seal this day of �„ ,2001. Printed Name: . Notary Public In and far the State of Washington. residing at • My ecxtnmisslon expires: . 0EVELOPME.; s ... CITY OF r EN C -. RECEVEL AGREEMENT FOR VERTICAL EASEMENT FOR OVERHANG This agreement is made this day of March 2001,between the municipal corporation known as the City of Renton Parks Department as ("Grantor")and PDSK Properties, Inc.,as Grantee. In consideration of$ _ ,and other good and valuable consideration,receipt which is hereby acknowledged by Grantor,and in consideration of the performance by the Grantor and Grantee of the covenants,terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, Grantor hereby conveys and warrants to Grantee the following Easement: 1. A non-exclusive, perpetual,vertical easement across,along, above and over Grantor's property,which abuts the west side of Grantee's property, as more particularly described in attached Exhibit"A." Said easement has two(2) locations on the west side of Grantee's property. One location on the north end of the west side and one location on the south end of the west side.The purpose of the easement is to allow the structural overhang of Grantee's building and roof area as more specifically delineated in attached Exhibit"A."The easement referred to herein shall run with land and be pertinent to the land and real property described on Exhibit"B_" 2. Said easement shall benefit the Grantee herein and all future owners of Grantee's property, and shall be,a burden upon Grantor's property,as more particularly described in attached Exhibit"B." 3. The easement is granted and subjected to and conditioned upon the following terms, conditions and covenants, which Grantee, Grantee's heirs,successor and assigns hereby promise to faithfully and fully observe and perform. Grantee shall maintain the structural overhang within the easement area in a structurally sound condition at all times. 4. It is further agreed that all maintenance, repair, improvement, and/or rebuilding of said structural overhand shall be the obligation and responsibility of Grantee, their heirs, successors and assigns. I 1%6 V%eV LLN ® r-r vrU fl 1F rri rvi r .r LJ vri v nr. ire • • S. Should it become necessary for either party to this agreement,their successors or assigns to enforce any to enforce any rights contained herein,the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees and costs. • EXECUTED as of the date set forth above. Agent for City of Renton Park Department, Grantor STATE OF WASHINGTON ) : ss COUNTY OF _,,,_„, ) On this day personally appeamd before me to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument,and acknowledged she/he signed the same as her/his free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purpaaes therein mentioned. Given under my harm and official seal this, day of _�,2001. Printed Name: _. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. residing at My cx7mmission expires: _ - • POSK Properties, Inc., Grantee STATE OF WASHINGTON ) : ss COUNTY OF ) On this day personally appeared before me ._ to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument,and adcnowledgathat she/he signed the same as her/his flee and voluntary act and deed tier the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Given under my hand and official seal this .... day of ,2001. Printed Name: Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. residing at My commission expires: L' C.u` 'vv b ld� +i_i_. c��ro-;q.�avrc,. . .0 'MAR052cj 3ECrI AGREEMENT FOR SEWER EASEMENT This agreement is made this day of March 2001,between PDSK Properties, Inc.,as ("Grantor")and municipal corporation commonly known as the City of Renton, as Grantee. In consideration of$ , and other good and valuable consideration in hand paid receipt, which is hereby acknowledged, and in consideration of the performance by Grantor and Grantee of the covenants, terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, Grantor hereby conveys and warrants to Grantee the following Easement: A non-exclusive, perpetual easement across, along, upon and under Grantor's property described in attached Exhibit"A", and by this reference made a part hereof for the purpose of installing, constructing, operating, maintaining, removing, repairing,replacing and using a sewer line consisting of pipe, not exceeding inches in diameter, together with all connections, manholes and underground appurtenances thereto(hereinafter the sewer line), together with the non-exclusive right of ingress to and egress from said property for the following purposes: a. A temporary non-exclusive easement for the purposes necessarily and reasonably related to the construction of sewer line across, along, in and upon Grantor's property described in attached Exhibit`°l3", attached hereto and by this referenced incorporated herein. Said easement to commerce on the date of this instrument, and to terminate on the date construction thereof is completed, or upon the day of 200 ,whichever shall first occur. b. A temporary non-exclusive easement for ingress to and egress from the property described in attached Exhibit "B"hereto, upon, along and across Grantor's property described in Exhibit"C"attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. Said easement to.commence on the date of this instrument and to terminate on the date Construction of the sewer lien is completed or upon the day of, 2001, whichever shall first occur. The terms,easement and easement area in this instrument referred to the easement on the property described in Exhibit"A",and for the period of their duration the easements on the property described in Exhibit"B"and"C " The easement is granted subjected to and conditioned upon the following terms, conditions and covenants, which Grantee promises to faithfully and fully observe and perform: 1. Costs cif construction aqd Maintenance. Grantor shall bear and promptly pay all costs and expenses of construction. Grantee shall bear and promptly pay all costs of maintenance, repair and replacement of the sewer line, 2. Specifications. Grantor shall construct the sewer line in accordance with the legal specifications as set forth by Grantor, Said specifications to be those required by law, 3. Cgmnliance with Laws and Rules. Grantee shall at all times exercise its rights herein and in accordance with the requirements as from time to time amended, and all applicable statues, orders,rules and regulations of any public authority having jurisdiction. 4. Approval of Plan. Prior to any construction, alternation replacement or removal of the sewer line or any other substantial activity by Grantee on Grantor's property, a notification of plans for the same shall be submitted in writing to grantor by Grantee, and no work by Grantee shall be commenced without Grantor's prior written approval. Said approval not to be unreasonably withheld, However, in the case of an emergency requiring immediate action by Grantee for the protection of its facilities and for protection of Grantor's facilities,or for the protection of other persons or property, Grantee may take such action upon such notice Grantor as is reasonable under the circumstances. 5. As Built$urvey. Upon Grantor's request, Grantee shall promptly provide Grantor with an as-built drawings and a survey showing the location and depth of the sewer line on Grantor's property. 6. C9ordination. Grantee and Grantor agree to coordinate the dates of construction activity and other major activity as is reasonable. 7. gang, and Repairs to Grantor's Facilities. Grantee shall promptly pay the Grantor the cost of any relocation, alternation, restoration, or other changes or repairs to Grantor's facilities,which Grantor shall reasonably deem necessary by reason of the construction use and maintenance of the sewer or other activities of the Grantee on Grantor's property. Grantee shall be responsible for repairing any damage to Grantor's buildings as a result of any repair work which is required to be done under the terms of this easement. For purpose of this Paragraph costs shall be defined as all direct or assignable costs of material, labor and services, including overhead in accordance with Grantor's job order policies in effect, and may include charges for transportation of men, material and equipment, storage expense of material and rental of equipment. 8. Work Standards. , All work to be performed by Grantee on Grantor's property shall in accordance with the plan submitted to and approved by Grantor and shall be completed in a careful and workman like manner to Grantor's satisfaction free of claims and free of liens. Upon completion of the construction of the sewer line on Grantor's property and on completion of any subsequent work performed by Grantee on Grantor's property. Grantee shall remove all debris and restore the surface of the property as nearly as possible to the condition in which it was at the commencement of such work, and shall replace any property, corner monuments, survey references,which were disturbed or destroyed during construction, including redoing the landscaping. 9. Rest`iis, op,on Access by Grantee. Notwithstanding that Grantee is granted the right of ingress to and egress from the property described in Exhibit"A"hereto,Grantee shall exercise - its right of ingress and egress only in such locations as may from time to time be reasonably designated by Grantor in accordance with such reasonable rules and regulations as Grantor may from time to time specific. Grantor shall at all times have the right to erect structures on, over or across the easement area or any part thereof, and to occupy the easement area with Grantor's c. facilitates and equipment. 10. Grantee's Use and Activities. Grantee shall exercise its rights under this agreement so as to minimize and avoid, if reasonably possible, interference with Grantor's use of the property. Grantee shall at all times conduct its activities on Grantor's property so as not to interfere with objection or endanger Grantor's operation or facilitates. 11. use of the Easement Area. Use of the easement area by Grantor or Grantee has been advised and is aware that Grantor is using or intends to use the property subject to the agreement for the purposes of building and maintaining a building as more particularly described on attached Exhibit"C." Construction of such facilities will require the installation of roads and other fixtures or improvements over, upon, across, and possibly under the easement area,and will require the location of structures with permanent foundations within the easement area. Nothing contained herein shall prevent or preclude Grantor's undertaking said construction. Grantor shall not be liable to Grantee or Grantee's employers, agents, contractors and users of the sewer line for lost or injury resulting from any damage or destruction of the sewer line directly or indirectly caused by Grantor's use of the easement area or Grantor's facilities on the easement area, except that loss or injury which results solely from Grantor's failure to exercise reasonable care not to damage or destroy the sewer line. 12. Terminatipn for Breach. In the event Grantee breaches or fails to perform or observe any of the terms and conditions herein, and fails to cure such breach or default within sixty(60)days of Grantor's giving Grantee written notice thereof,or if it is not reasonably capable of being cured within said 60-day period within such other period of time as may be reasonable under the circumstances, Grantor may terminate Grantee's rights under this agreement, in additional and not in limitation of any other remedy Grantor has at Iaw or inequity, and the failure of Grantor to exercise such right at any time shall not waive Grantor's right to terminate for any future breach or default. 13. Termination. In the event Grantee ceases to use the sewer line for a period of 5 successive years,this agreement and all of Grantee's rights hereunder shall terminate and revert to Grantor: 14. Release of Obligations on Termination. No termination of this agreement shall release Grantee from any liability or obligation herein. 15. Removal of Sewer Line on Termination. Upon any termination of this agreement, Grantee shall promptly remove from the easement area the sewer line and restore the ground to the condition then existing prior to removal. Said work and removal to be done at the sole cost and expense of Grantee, and in a manner satisfactory to Grantor. 16. Third Party Rightl. Grantor reserves all rights with respect to its property, including without limitation the right to Cant further easements, licenses and permits to others, subject to the rights granted in this agreement. 17. Release and Indemnity. Grantee does hereby release and,indemnify and promise to defend and save harmless Grantor from and against any and all liability, loss, damage, expense, actions and claims, including costs and reasonable attorney's fees incurred by Grantor in defense thereon asserted or arising directly or indirectly on account of any acts or admissions of Grantee and Grantee's agents,employers, and contractors in the exercise of the rights granted herein_ • 18. I sprogp. During the course of any of Grantee's construction activities or other substantial activities on Grantor's property, and prior to commencement thereof,Grantee shall submit to Grantor certifications of insurance in a form approved by Grantor evidencing that Grantee or Grantee's contractor have comprehensive general liability coverage, including board- from contractual liability coverage satisfactorily to Grantor with limits no less than the following: a. Bodily Injury Liability, including automobile bodily injury liability, $2,000,000.00 each occurrence,property damage liability including automobile property injury liability$2,000,000.00 each occurance. 19. 1,li 1p. The rights granted herein are subject to permits, leases, licenses,easements, if any, heretofore granted by Grantor effecting the property subject to this easement. Grantor does not warrant title to its property, and shall not be liable for defects thereto. 24. Notices. Notices required to be writing under this agreement shall be given as follows: If the Grantor: if the Grantee: Notices shall be deemed effective upon the date of mailing. 25. Assignment. Either party shall assign its rights hereunder without prior written consent of the other, which consent shall not be reasonably withheld. 26. Successors. Subject to the proceeding Paragraph,the rights and obligations of the parties shall in no way be to the benefit of and being binding upon the respective successor and assigns. 27. Should it become necessary for either party to this agreement, their successors or assigns to enforce any to enforce any rights contained herein, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees and costs. EXECUTED as of the date set forth above. Agent for City of Renton,Grantor STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss (...'OIINTY OF ) On this day personally appeared before me to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that she/he signed the same as her/his five and voluntary act and doed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Given under my hand and official seal this _day of _-,2001. Printed Name: Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. residing at My commission expires: PQSK Properties, Inc., Grantee STATE OF WASHINGTON ) : ss COUNTY OF ) On this day personally apprwed befu a me to me known to be the individual desaibcxl in and who occulted the within and foregoing instrument,and acdcnowledged that she/he signed the same as her/his free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Given under my hand and official seal this day of ,2001.