Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA96-159
Zoning Data Building Data . Project CanacU Data TeoRM-I IReede0al MJI-Faaly MN WWI,/Cole MU Wle•mWe Cod e o. Lot h.1 NO.u. o a V-I 14., Mete. Rea Maple Avow let 0M,bw. D..1y 1b/0El0•l5J Ave. 0eapa NU op R•I 0.� Jae I ISO.J0 .•JOO UM f&O.. Reber of Floor* Tee et Mawr. cap Wes ter rver Mead Sc f 1 St UN.AOwrd 8J0l888 Or TOUT 00lcd0 boa•]lym aJ. YWla Pcpaled Mabee stela aft aJ.iJ?IJ et. CT�amApmd.BN6.1 2 T ebb g•e• r -R..WU Reeed ov ma b agea 1030 . ocro-Td211 n MMgla ..-C-0 Moped.J•lt amid. euli.g Tee Total Awing b.••IW el ad. Y3%4 ratpm t d Ea Rear 1IIa.I..J.m=J. ContractorContractorLAW(fealmerd, o Ce.v.gd M,cad JOAOe.I. Garage. 1GOC el. WWI&0%.,RM JM-Jaa-laT ,read. "opea'd• "'°"` Legal Description A�°t Rags M 818 Foe MO Kt8 A,rer MN. n-m•Mtn Mtn petr°or eavem.Iota Ufl/p�nar..�d U emcee.M lm.I¢0•meth rage ba.4 War ee0 R.:0mm m-0• Lam Moe LK w wgOfrn Coon M�v� or RMS.Uand•.eeple•etr TA awneal xaa-Ja-tm Rev IbS dew...a.fellow. ��' d•o'11p Cmr6 no•I the SCWest cm of let Adm..el 80098m RtlF4011.1 20•-0. acceNvj to No plat Owe,meetl In der la el W4~1 ma. Orb WWe°wept tierce FAA WO.fast to I.Easterly FmgU er^^P11. Tb4und D,0•rot Aww,SILL romp Raab Stela Rd we pent et beateega duce emI bg•r. Day[.gar.. A•�d O40' Mot to On 9leste• hope.of Zeman.rape twee�Mr,eg uN DD fanst Atone epee roJ Doan apam LF.Regard Fe or ea/0,g3pbapoi nee WdUrwPeK Vrr eiw U.Iw 206-.1-11341 Rge.d open J. F%po•w 14A40 are r y oargm Mw . RtMd 00 C0al Ayer 4 w tato Rage.e LB ON ca.nLSl.ICpa°/a WU 2 Kaet.�-S� US It Jc late.•Oa apace.•,Op•m•••O Spat.. J Bat..Res(pacm 50i+l'•d Ftopo•.d M Opaue Proposed 32 cowered Opece kit.,J ben.Roe gwes-par[Nee b.M0ea Ondtrd Spaces•Y a JD'-SC 31090.rl 0334303 J I✓0 Corp..Spew•O•-a•.b•.b M1epmtl.2,3 T Me.dde Tod Q Olen Yard Oetba. 0.61 P95w Meat.W Oat•.I.TYR. EtVi lytdb��1•=}0'e Wra Mala o•d fie star ,a /�q1 1_.r w I 411_ _n��q Nu ysly `p a. nearan.p__..., aa�..c 'V � . , � < ,e tv._ / `✓ .n ,,,7, ^ i 1 ENSNCE/4 4q - ;,,, : n � � <- . f 'p ! -. i —_ n.aa . . _ v.. •!-.earn—u- �.,,; •a s/ �� %i I _siid 4, 0t�I�� - � n ? s„;)/K / /1 IF 4 e 4% %k-V, 4..,/ qc 4tr OA--. * / .• N.....,,, t , ,_,._ „,,,,,,,,,, ,. ik.,, , _.... , , ,,_, li• E - CE/ .. ' d / sic. \I1 nalro =11=11=�\U�EXIT q / // 2`/` TD. • / •/ 11.=1 %V� O• F / node d 'e'"m — !//�� raC / Traw•m / /, n.ae i / 1 A n+►. 1111 Re•ItA / S.:Y;,\ • ..'' ` �l lel 4I-% � a [IIs_/ . i.' / MFAV \y Ir_ =�7�1-u1— it �i� �\/� / AO II II �I II11 I 1111 �= � . . / //Ilo J` JJexr - t1r ....Q/lilN SITE rmtiomo • a'-0' 20-0. A@-o e0-o• Mira • Mil Zoning Data Building Data Project Data lwr Rr-I fRosattol tab-Puny MID PAPP,Coda I991.Worm Pet.,Code noporp MCO... a.0 Maple dvr..016 V € l.ota M.110✓. Ca P-1 Now f€ Dwel1y moleI 0.6 60•MS Acne Ll'ap2'9 T R'I Pow 66160ai� �� S D .DDe IM.lose.. Par of Flow. Two or N..re cap act rider Hone,PC. 35 Wu 61.a d OWlenp Ore TotalbNg Area•]eem.✓. 31 968 ON6 a 36 U W Proposed E...F Floor 1,D1.sr,3•]D,DII et Tad.,OAA De6Y ]Type'A'0.nlr-Res Wu y>.d God,* 26.8✓. _ . wlefa 6Y-0'Allard,2-6r 6w1oo PAWN Too Tout ON66,Ana•]6p0]✓. Contractor echrly]Mope,Nc b'-0•Prapw.d Ee.Fbw 1,D11✓.a D.]D,D]]✓. 6610 ew&r 811 OPP 1 Lot Co...gs DDf 61wrd lrngu ]Lam✓. ttle.Dyed Alla: DOAN✓. ]mea.ea.T �,,�, Prop* Legal Description 6.'t. to Nocao e.Ale Para • TM Is.II SKI Nt6.cl816-buWYp 23 rwVtlup. Coat..ate. De10 Fugnred ]0b't1N Du.4 OIIM1 NKag Cewly YYWn Wlwrof�ul mp.of Rrbl&on ]06-9]]-119] . Prop* ]0'-O' F D d-w1:1":4 ro11wr01 tti dam flbllc leWs.DYtrbr 2% Mctv.l Eylrr 1ese Prop d ]0'-0•. Ng.t erewum.•t mnr erbt]6,Obd.m er E.r(Ngw Prop* •c u tar once l.er r.rad.t o Pear N o1 N.u,P1 r.rcrm eb. orwb6➢t 32086WN31.)6823=da yPe rreri6ly mr3N of l'I.p). Cell E,g1. oe0Fj4 Prr 33,g,6ed 0e wrd peM er b.glreug. 0 .res 4 Cato w 1Y.p8. 0'-0•!1N Postmen, st e.yr ui 11.3�uty.1poet Pence to Ur w Cp.e Ewes Oa r.P6.d poi w b...9a..68- der 61r poet Pence �•l34OD] p.prad 600'1 O. D..nlc. e..s O0.... Proposed, urND✓. 00 Central Ards 6.6A1.DDD P•ed-g Ire,SA 3e031 I].l0r.d lb ep.u.wt.l ewes 1.INlu 206-ee4-934. U 2 D6 IMu.1..p21 r For 6wu N•9o°'•d PrcpwM 66 6wu.Prepo..d,6]cevr d ewm , 4r ar!Oart186 Res ewes-per ost.Blr-.,S. 6uM1M Vac..3'a 20`-60 Proposal Inctortag D MC Coswct 6wu•e'-6•a W'-4 FTapw.d-]6e Plea° i/ ,t/ / o f of Travel-T.P./ / I\\ _ b -s �� �,�. —y. n.�wrc.IG.'°!SD�'y I a1I2 !:`1� ! 'v!^ - A dell -•• .1... I J! �, Obz,. ESA t 6Ci.. .%' —.I lam. ,. S 'terdENTRANCE/ 44 il �6 111 III P'Ui moil �! "ii'MAY U� li Ifl"ifi"`iil I��G ':' �"�i IfI "" w„ _ EXR �j' -Wv �'� '�-11 Iii�, I.I III I°'II 111� , I iI j `w 1=Ho�1[T i l�II 111111111I II�k . ,,I1I .I 1 w>ko% a . j�II / ::,.i,-rto.il o r /� ,ilot •••)M, Ai'\ , �3 _.. _wil t.. 11ElID 1•`L •A Ogee 'ji nr IIIVIp ®� \ \\ �.�gT.. ....111_2-,7_,-, ,it \,, • \ �3P Ab. n11�IIII II iVly! ��r �� �! eio IIIII\�.1 , r� III III \\ . \ i IV Iln tl�l 11 I der " ../ �.. - "_ II ; ���� n=1T1-u E cE/ IIVi 1( l !�O o- - __.. .:4111 V� D i v Ta EXIT I if �IQO "` 4�iAb .1.m.. �� —III— I�. ' it .4, k. 1 ��' •�•�, �. *.-7 jam 40 i I i }:1 1 / •. q \,„, \ /, ,11i = �i �, Eu�H.,. lip' i y? �®C. ��,� �,��:I�;d1 � _ "�IV`��•�I� ' ' —'.A- WI . / • ' -.-,,,,ttlfr !� `'— JI1��I=1�rI�L=III=\ �\ /__Ni, , ' ittAL, v III=11I—�—III-1-1 1---1l�l_ ,�,�pp��� • 1° / 1=W�1— llll—III—III=III'lll \I a.r.GD. = t6,� .10 4'" e�` tee' `\ / �' •� Prey Lw _ enito 1 \ ;/ f r 7 Site Plan lriiti...r.i.i..... I AS-C mil-----mmgarbA . . MI --- -r.j W __.. __.:_i_ 4_ ______.._ 77._ •. time 1 _ . . . . . . .. ..7_. i Ili - _. ____ .-__...___-____... ... _ ____...._ ..- - ii . .. .._ ....,.,.. . . . .. . . --' 1 Atli so - ,-... _ - .,' L--- '. - -• ...•-,..: '-': p' j!! S 2nd ST ®,„ .��/� �®: j1 . ir. ,.. ..,. .../, _ � � � f Ili ..- si err i� 11��- aft 'two 6-: ok so. Iv! ...1„,„, fr,„ , 4 If • irAiV eti 41 01 • . - -.• C'&11 El Ea -..., st 41 :Ijoilli W,. VI • r. • • - ''.' LT =In: I. . ftet,fr to' a°1 ___, .. rr•Av ft/imirrf, .. :.=1-1'i 1,' 11118,0Adi imi.4.- ES En #&N"liiii 1PF - '11,',70011111 arm I= =.'MI ' =.4.=. 4.104111111111111 - Ph- --- iteei . . . * - . .It:.j. ing as .01 E! . SW 7th �;1ffIll I ST • 41114. _ l- PiE: :'=,-trz. IV II it.-mig.01,&i.,.!A px. PP .. .,:,,...._,.,,.,:.:,..„, : ..• -. .. .:7 • . .: wtipth:1::::c:ziS 111111101/ 0- - tHl__11. nom . • eow WO. IOW ■�o 010 w ii S RENTON VILLAGE PL WOO Dods �r // ir I,irlilr r1 . • . 1ZO'''''' ::.•:" 01-1. - V . rd --I P1 Pleat&hedge a 1 opa l Panic erne/apron ape ag./cane 3 ac . 1-M•re 4b•ul ° 10 rr,ali®. atiena-aa°wL red awe.ape y W I�Japalar Imo'b 0 cal 10-0 reel as. ended/all b.l.nutl d - p•Myra a gel - 5-60.12. raWtl/u.Y Parced pn pee alga 1-0R r.d 1.. raldad/all bal ae pa pcc pg.cal r�lccff Y W rer' I-b'-Y cal 10-0 M1.11. aidd cal e / l balrnced peer di d Naasa roarer 0-g - - Igel paps.WbWy M radoliban...Ida 21-S.• b r b ceps.red buoy nnma a amen required in MI patng bed. rry.o4..t ben ay mu cm°ing a realest • I part raipaa l.ea• ak • SW At'"4' m V ►, ar ? !► ! -, 4., ,� s�r� .K�3 • /� I _ !%/I _ P,JJ,S+,.<)n"rrmr xtn�r glr w�nrJnF .'i1r Fier cinr m 3@ 1 • i19 1 pi Ihs4�/ `cow °ee° 0..'IIr-P +�� �jj[S� ../A Ea h,.'t� i /r�,1 e4_Ar- oylt,., �' �� `NW/ der vim s�'p � '' b.E�I 1. $fj1; t ' era 41 'A t ` xity,0 /// . • .1w,r y.Q� � in r► ;4 441,P,(4, Mr .� �"iY / V 4�i °—ca V A. Vol, ai;i!iilllllliriliiiiliiii.iilinor �% Ito �• / ��• // Z O i1I111Ill Mi i itie r..1,11i1i. /� ��I / 6- Drai-' lk, iv—�r%d, c-P .I.�i //AG,I�i{4r`o� .����/" ��.c> r / I� ��j„�F�1'(',J�gF'tr ,40,4.':J rr,,r•P 11-1 r 1•"I 1 r ."' / .7+:�I IU J I', IiIIIIIII.!I.I I!I Le.ilrl.i IIIIIIIIu Ii N'A dIR"i,_ —• �i //�i.._ — _ u',�� J ''.', — �i� ���'oYlp.. I'1"I'I•I p(I' y�I rl�rl'�u �� ��•�. • r p �_ — �_ ..... .�4;4 111I11111.k.i_61biggfi!i nli Ililli.ii i.i4011liP1011•!�7 ; Aw .€ Site Plan - Landscape eh . d PCILE.r.20.4. • AS-L roll 0,2 • • Plant Schedule a 1 A▪bel Po.. ono 1-g Idl ala/t ac acar1-W to a-a .t l. l.Igla I-NatW - ♦no ln_ boon cape o+ c.cidply o,p.c.= 1-y to 0 cal m•0 r-w tutor bultlrtl/toll Pa cl Ibldl 1,IarclI If gal b-t V.It weal/nrtl b.lod Pn pn.^IA. l-lb R. otd.d/boll baled w pa. prc pro Ulla,.•tltu6lclr' I-b'-rcal m-OR. rutd.e/al bala.cE dodo fang p r . db cbt=oiclo. 0-e 1,1 vpad.tl 1 rdl rhorlandron Vhiroklor. 11-fa• b. coped aMbWf ddrolo*on n tt.r.•'topbell nq0 In WI peabg b.d. taper I to -vay ola car.latY9 or t).10100ga I part cca«.rand I part coapeaW bull • • Bs 4e,PM°6 V /// 'I:.JI J �)t:�!J�. 1I� ► 14—.' Pn p S1I9 u sN►P,gau. _ J,1► -ii,P"' m.(6' Ah vacv 'vdlir /ll�• --cA i,,4 :/,fir wllr - ,611 a, Ito . 11x5 V !F-1,%e'L lib V. m , b iiiii �n��� 411. �taf • yr. i �I/7/� m .alga t�"`���IA Witiv3.7/ AI f u.' e� � iiw vv �.� i6 v `�t���o .�1 ��E it -'zs i �y, �;' `<e oft ♦ m �� , .off•• v ��� .. 0�� � • ♦ • of ♦ b•toct• �� `:0 ' 0,, • / e ra ,,. .��itir Jr/0,F a u At t . 4" .49, ,. Zd: „op. j I 0,l I f +s'• c., Jawill, ,,.• A / v is f v d/Sr� i',fbl.iillllll�gi.0 �.o� r7 r . v V illllllllli.i!l!llif.liii.'!.i!Sf.ilbL ii0i/I� d}1/ yr, '4�'`,� ` �� '��� 7y v A „*.i• �j�/�G/ _ AP, �, ��'� '- '� ✓� 'r�F If4A�rO I��%''%10IIIIIIIIiilil!ilil!i4i'Piliif'I!IIIIII IIIII;i!Si!iiii!is`i9a ''��"'� 'U'. , .r �di1,`+ 1 t!Ir i trot ir.f ii.fijl j� I ii ipf'I f'i t, Y� r .. ✓ 44,04.IIIlIIIIII•i!n.n,i_bi,i_n,f.bi.nIIIIIIII 0001D,i!!.l!bill!'.b 410 willP villw" — \ . m v .:i • Site Plan - Landscape �, • AS-L e C CO Ir CV E 0u — stucco CHIMNEYS • /\ __ 7\__\•"7\ ;-;' .14 IIITIMMEIMig N ❑ L ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ OPEN STAIRvELLS �� illi VINYL SIDING Tyr • / 1 / —/--IC— /—\- 3❑ l h -7C- i ,_ . v . =E , / . /�- �\ \ — , \! / �� B.R B'GARAGE DODDS I — / \ / \ / \ / \ I I LINE Or FOOTINGS OWEST ELEVATION I/B•=1'-D• BUILDING ONE .R,RR. R..9.R. ! C i IR,&P.1 ��� RR4 M 1 -_� -� of II C ❑ IIIIIIJ El 1 - - _ _ J 111101 1 ❑ - - I — _ MIL ❑ C I T I_ O NORTH ELEVATION O SOUTH ELEVATION r� -� L BUILDING ONE 1/8I'-U' BUILDING ONE g STUCCO CHIN.rS I =\- VINYL SIDING Try ----— : ® G =f::l:::I z II _ �:wI o ==. El __./ _ OVERFLOv SCUPPEPS — ^ — - - �' oee- __ __i __, .._ , . =F ! _ _ - iu LINE OF FOOTINGS 1 EAST ELEVATION JBUILDING ONE IY S. 0521 ' CO 07 I. -!5 I x q .il I I STUCCO CHIMNEYS /\\ II1L- . ■rit....41 ! \ OPEN SlatawELLS ' I _1 1 I} _ g'N T GARAGE DOORS / \ T-\ T'-\ T \ r_i - T-\c T-\-T \\- T '"` -- / \\ i\ /\\ / \\ /\ /\ -T T WEST ECEDA710T— -� LP.or Poonncs O .. BUILDING ONE ... . ...__ 44.......... .4Z.1 Z qiii II ill il .______ .. - _ it._ _ --------. __. --i MI a.1_ ___. .-... El i I = r ,„„ __- -IL ___ �- 1 -� I --�--- . r O SOUTH ELEVATION O NORTH ELEVATION _ I/e'=1'_p• BUILDING ONE I/B'•I'-0" BUILDING ONE __a _ STUCCO CHIMNEYS — —,' ',— ., - ,� NNVL SIDING.L1P — - r_��••• A'.:j:'j.� — .. =NMI■■a ilk■..I. IL u o u� __�l_-_ OVERFLOW SCUPPERS •.. —_ _=— = EN _■ -- =:i•,• :■■■IR__—_ —. I::•••I=•• • t---_ _IIII—�.T�—[1111— n • LINE OF FOOTINGS r ' O EAST ELEVATION BUILDING ONE 1 9521 • Zoning Data Building Data Project Data @ 1gpq 1�-105.1•].at.l 5.1-Nally.II./ W.,C:Cei PA4 11,11c.WWI,rode RWety id.. 440 M.pl.Avenue SU 0 O..Iat•3 WIC a43.0•L.Aor .543..J TypoR--1..• Pine Joy e•3T.Wr Ym j 03 a 20 Y.u•Md..Made Net.or Moon Tao el Basarnt oda dyldwidar tlor,6a 35 MN... luW.g 0ro Totaldl3 Ana•0.2✓. 63b 2,676973 Mt.4 TT Wit*'9231Prop* 4. Floor .]3,5]✓. I.,WA IOW 2 Typo•A wu Rq.Y.G oa4gr ]660✓.x 3 206I20-24r Wlgnt 36'-0•&Md.d-N etw. GWW69 Tao Tout MI.,Au.•0p02✓. Werer3r 651•.We..a.6e. 3p'-0•PrcPo•d E..FWe 19'u✓.xi.]3.0]]✓. 65106wucen_GNS9 la rae.g. 330.Ahead. (Yeg. ]Ad0✓. T0®N YI• A 3613e • AIb.1 a NA.✓. 2411 ..boo, ^°�°-°• ]4 66✓. Legal Description 0.01-14. e�,l`�:, liact Pad.. ]0•-0•Me dal t�•WM OK.,Co nth W�•y.IaNi66 le.. or]�di. M.tt1..0A YIG .M�p 06-322-1152 Repo* 255-0• Lan arO4tl In 1.. •or Pa leeWl a L4M•.Ng4•be]S 3...01 Eger • Roar • .•ro R"W'd mawWear ga t Wrt e 6dr or lot]D6b4 10 Gering./, or Gering . Rep.. 0/-0•� ilacordtd to°.p•4t 1. .er rraA.e 6 v3Yee I!of Plod ppp BW. q Aev u W•.6...y.tr.v.. W.p M wE.r6t om6g•er0PI•�� CMI Fgw pm, vr. Rve p'-'r6 cast to W¢ tr3 wrg6 aEPa.W.yt .r o63Nv4 along �Dal Avarua 6.du.R3 . aa . pot 6Ybot WA 33632 ...pc• e.1 .d F.7� �9°&Pe' 5.5 15.5.5 GOOT✓. 6wyw coy Ergv•••. Rap... 1.0✓. 1215 antral Avea.6.din R. P.h6g 24''WA 300N.Rio . 16 Bperu4Wt•I Bp.0/4 P. - OB4' is x 3616Iu•64•p•r.•e opera•63<p.m b From Bps.*R.qutr.4 Prop* 66 opera Prop..32 002.o.3 Bp.. 6rA.e2g 3 Garr Fr ep.3--p.deli 6W✓3M• din..ep.0•3'a]0'-30 Repot.65b.36g 3NG CapaBper.6b••W'-r Rcpwy-]3. I "C. /• ,/ ,,.1/' or.danor Pao.-TrP�/ j /, i veW.rae e:lesd: jII ^\ - 1111 6 $ / i /' / Pr .5/...w. %J \\II\\ 9 \\ du../ u"� T,r n',e•�c. Sf d4! '-1!. 1! 'E ! ��I -_�! .ten.44 If •- .1.`7 t. ■ � ,�� ■ -i�r '4 3'Ta�iyua- p��•H•wt {.r•L_I' :�I y��ryrrn �:.,PB� r ENTRANCE/ • g spy ��/ Cl�ll� 'Je / i,�"pI9■ilr iMi 1t LI9Il jif III 01 IIf Is IILL"'f7-- [:~i°. iI IW\W k k W._. '�1Y_I •IIJ 1,1 1 i� IXR 4 Y 3 \\ ro/( .1�.*:.. r �111 Il I IIIII,:u I ' fI I II• R�li�-'y� Il�� 1, !' I� _,a. _� ';`1Si1 •. / II✓ 4 • --• /-- ��iRil II •H _�`v...y.w.Ig. c �\ �1� //4 Pe'� .et �` n •ir /ii• l -1111 ‘ AIIIPANIA 1.\ -i All ••\ ;.r/Iy i■ I jrr A� /�` • ., D (I" •///�� ®`Y\ �\\ E.ayr.� m3 ,. / w d _Y III • • ,,,...411r4j f' e 6 ill t l�'�•��� r;l 09 t •\ j. III de. 4- r �,A1, pl d . ,,'��® 0 ,yp- ; vi I VI'" Ir ,'� v� � '' ' (�) ,ear .: � �► r�.n �\ �\ i 1 k i ''II I I `A big@ e \I ?� / i�R -III-I \ °'4 \ _ a_ IY 1AI01111 /I I ,y+ �" •tT ��II -W=11 E C� 11011111111101 In �0 }; \ ��i� ..4 ° \ fi 4 �� rill /E>uT o �. II Id•9 �•r-111111' I 111,11 .0-, ‘70.-kw. -.Trz,:,,, ,.. ed 1 e• •, NV . . II '� • � �� 6N '�i� III4111 .f (11, �' Vehrl �' ► G�.. . R ',. . A---- --Tii"), / .. • ,,\ 0 •-•---... -46; a r A rm.. Apr4 'I \ ilir � 4. �7 _— —� 1 \76481444(4r �, _ =wik\ 11JTCL�= �` T \9:,IPPrj T,i .� � . *.uta:; - I ; 1 _ lili I 9� .\ - m� *�� J — _e ! \ r nelrMkiLe I 1:r I1I r / / Q — -- A \`.Me u13 V fI rala� lIIIIFa - C O �,%. f- . . �IG ��•�.` �eY , / • d�� ivi t 636D I__ ___ \ -� Rcimty lue ,`- �•.Cali de. ' i 21 Site Plan ennl_ •uuuuuuu■■■ AS-C RGd OAR Mai]..G31 1 IM_ITIUt r I IA _ a,'1H i art mo / r :'c:o■rmo■o�w'■Rl■Io vvam if Ip1/1[fYfa4l CISAM Ma PN ILIO,MI VP. IM to MOM CM oLmr MA SW 4t1 PloceiAdS,, \\. \\ 1:rsoa.' tii ■ `oaDRl■1�m ow .eN- Iirri.,T? • d,,•.•-,o,o,,0 1f,I._'I.I 4IaIII740,0,0r,,1,so i _„i,.i.__l__..._A—_.i.4..li..o__r..._"_._/,.._,.,._,_, .\\:.I,„W IAZI17. 2_,11i1 T.i..I:v=i111.1WAt.lg..r__,."...(A1? i.\.i, �� Itt ■ r.�rnr.IDn�mw�vn■ ■ ■ ■ ... ��■ ■�■■■ \ 01l 4?P a moos v nr macsarr roam■dsr■larvrr '�i�� au avavoo■o i,, • ' I •r �-` ` �`\� % IOW r LIHPO:OM■M M'�a4 al= �, )4f,,e, ,,,1 , 4 \ .moo.v as OMRSimsw, itir Alo s__. _„ . / \ \ N 's ., . * ,. \.,,\ , ,:oi 4 ./.#1,7iV 0. /, \ . ..le • � � rf41F/74, sir �i a.zaw. 40, M.�' f".\:1 / \\II a fl.'fr;illtaltratapp ' Asiel:).2:'''-- . \\ CO.SSP AV.MS if/fir lirl P / 4k ''''‘i.. . \ I /fr i Ali )11P44*.,,.. ,, 111(14 ..ar.ra a.aa_.. .—� . .. ■ram■■r�r■ dr ■ 5. .26• PROPERTY LINE 'E,`!"' . \ a. 141Ou'Y gS(9 \ 4....tlr,a.,col GRAPHIC SCALE TO p 'P w ao LeffMa MOTO (corm) p .yL�p I Ma-a M1 ,EVEl1e1lF—'-4A oyL6�y1 [S — 6510 SOU SCHNE1 LSO.A�(.A WA MU mote{4G{ (no - -sou MOW Ma L10r)2Y_2O71 M OIDOLT APARTMBJIS Q D 151011 ,o SURIMPICI 0014cemw WIRY PLAN �•Ay Y.2co -o■mm1(Dlo 2 IOro r au a I - ••.o■D I•■■IGI II.1197 I'. CI20 I•T �t o 2* tr: •. . \/ . 0...... - ii. gg �►. / „ ''''''' • aa. ,' ' --,.. _ 'tom i I 1�.r� lel' awlANT ic3/is �. I, , `" i .,5; ` _ u �i�' . . � „Y7 T. o � V..,..,,,„ ., , io3 +�J'a.Ero' " \ f� x ` ' ,9 sr � ' aI ,;� �e j r+1 zri\o, �►� ift, . it .ii.,'" isks.......*-4 4„,„„44I-1)6.:Wle 4 ! A' "1. . . tea _= ,---:' ' -4* - %Kt:kw i i i Qq//IIi9 ��1% r }-,� A� Kt iy 5 a �"oea'o . r � Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA BILL OF SALE Property Tax Parcel Number: 182305-9244 Project File#: 2348 Street Intersection: 430 Maple Ave SW Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1. Schneider H&meas, Inc. 1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation 'C1' The Grantor,as named above,for,and in consideration of mutual benefits,hereby grants,bargains,sells and delivers to the Grantee,as named above,the following described personal property now located at: 1"4 430 Maple Ave SW in the City of Renton,County of King and State of Washington,to-wit: Water Distrbution System Improvements •,i'ff4 Storm Drainage System Improvements Street Improvements Street Lighting By this conveyance,Grantor will warrant and defend the sale hereby made unto the Grantee against all and every person or persons,whomsoever,lawfully claiming or to claim the same. This conveyance shall bind the heirs,executors, administrators and assigns forever. /1 �1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and sea 'day a bel 4 '44 Notary Seal must be within box INDIVIDUAL FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS a COUNTY OF KING ) T. 1t1 :°� I certify that I know or have satisfactory,evidence that �' .'' o 5,10Pgi .�„';+D0 ( TO r-Q /.�� SeAn4 Sr signed this instrument and •,d a/cicatowtetiged it to be his/her/their free and unt . act for the uses and purposes p =y:v �QT RL '��': mentioned)in eYnstrum nt y� • e!. t PUBLIC f, l �% J ` 2 �-lC� �'� ' „ No, ,`�Public in land for the State of W hi}gton �, N�d7' (Print) ejeVAO611�t1� .rfr ea/a/QK—) 2,4 <;N` :-� My appointment expires: s-/s- 0/ Dated: /A -/O•-91 0 uv r H:\FORMS\KCRECORD\BOS.DOC\bh Page 1 co N 01 Ol • • BILL OF SALE 1 Property Tax Parcel Number: 182305-9244 Project File#: 2348 Street Intersection: Address: 430 Maple Ave SW Reference Number(s)of Documents assigned or released:Additional reference numbers are on page Grantoe(s): Grantee(s): 1. Schneider .Homes, INc. 1. City of Renton,a Municipal Corporation 2. The Grantor,as named above,for,and in consideration of mutual benefits,hereby grants,bargains,sells and delivers to the Grantee,as named above,the following described personal property. WATER SYSTEM: IM613 B. Water L.F.of " DI'a' Main L.F. L.F.of 6 " DI • Water Main L.F.of Water Main 0 3 each of 8 " Gate Valves I\ each of " Gate Valves 2 each of Fire Hydrant Assemblies 0 SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM: Length Type L.F.of Sewer Main L.F.of 1, Sewer Main L.F.of Sewer Main each of " Diameter Manholes each of " Diameter Manholes each of " Diameter Manholes STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM: Length ,Size 15l 307 L.F.of 12 " RCP Storm Line 190 L.F.of 12 " CP EP Storm Line L.F.of " Storm Line each of " Storm Inlet/Outlet 4 each of " Typo 1 Storm Catch Basin each of Manhole STREET IMPROVEMENTS: (Including Curb,Gutter,Sidewalk,Asphalt Pavement) Curb,Gutter,Sidewalk L.F. 415 Asphalt Pavement: SY or L.F.of Width STREET LIGHTING: #of Poles 2 By this conveyance,Grantor will warrant and defend the sale hereby made unto the Grantee against all and every person or persons,whomsoever,lawfully claiming'or to claim the same. This conveyance shall bind the heirs,executors, administrators and assigns forever. H:\FU E.SYS\FRM1S4HNDOLTMILZSALE.DOC\MAB Page 1 g . SA-- liig-1 S t Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,WA 98055-2189 L7 Title: UTILITIES EASEMENT Property Tax Parcel Number: 182305-9244 Project File#: OZBOLT APARTMENTS Street Intersection or Project Name: SW 43rd PL & Maple SW •-1 Reference Number(s)of Documents assigned or released: Additional reference numbers are•on page - Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1. Schneider Homes,Inc. 1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation Additional legal is on page of document. (Abbreviated legal description MUST go here.) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A portion of Parcel 2,City of Renton lot line adjustment No. LLA-052-90,recorded under Recording No. 9011019001 and lying within the southwest quarter of Section 18,Township 23 North,Range 5 East, W.M.,in King County,Washington. Cu Ca O Cn Qoo C� X Y %!3 i0,44pSr/es. II:\FILE.SYS\FRM\03EASEMN\0013.DOC\ Page 1 FORM 03 0013/bh/CA2-21-97 CO CO 71 N +p� Vt That said Grantor(s), for and in consideration of mutual benefits,do by these presents,grant,bargain_ sell,convey,and warrants unto the said Grantee,its successors and assigns,an easement for public -- utilities(including water,wastewater,and surface water)with necessary appurtenances over, under, through,across and upon the following described property(the right-of-way)in King County, Washington,more particularly described on page 1. (or if full legal is not on page 1—Exhibit A.) For the purpose of constructing,reconstructing,installing,repairing,replacing, enlarging,operating and maintaining utilities and utility pipelines,including,but not limited to,water,sewer and storm drainage lines,together with the right of ingress and egress thereto without prior institution of any suit or proceedings of law and without incurring any legal obligation or liability therefor. Following the initial construction of its facilities, Grantee may from time to time construct such additional facilities as it may require.This easement is granted subject to the following terms and conditions: • 1. The Grantee shall,upon completion of any work within the property covered by the easement, restore the surface of the easement,and any private improvements disturbed or destroyed during execution of the work,as nearly as practicable to the condition they were in immediately before commencement of the work or entry by the Grantee. 2. Grantor shall retain the right to use the surface of the easement as long as such use does not rl interfere with the easement rights granted to the Grantee. Grantor shall not,however,have the right to: a. Erect or maintain any buildings or structures within the easement;or b. Plant trees,shrubs or vegetation having deep root patterns which may cause damage 9.1 0 to or interfere with the utilities to be placed within the easement by the Grantee;or c. Develop,landscape,or beautify the easement area in any way which would unreasonably increase the costs to the Grantee of restoring the easement area and any private improvements therein. d. Dig,tunnel or perform other forms of construction activities on the property which would disturb the compaction or unearth Grantee's facilities on the right-of-way,or endanger the lateral support facilities. e. Blast within fifteen(15)feet of the right-of-way. This easement shall run with the land described herein,and shall be binding upon the parties,their heirs, successors in interest and assigns. Grantors covenant that they are the lawful owners of the above properties and that they have a good and lawful right to execute this agreement. By this conveyance, Grantor will warrant and defend the sale hereby made unto the Grantee against all and every person or persons,whomsoever,lawfully claiming or to claim the same.This conveyance shall bind the heirs, executors,administrators and assigns forever. H:\FILE.SYS\FRM\03EASEMN\0O13.DOC\ Page 2 FORM 03 00 13/bh/CA2-2 1-97 IN WITNESS'. REO , have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. Manager of Development And Construction) Ii7DUAL FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal Sjebersvtti iJ Homes F WASHINGTON ) OUNTY OF KING )SS I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: an REPRESENTATIVE FORM OFACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING )SS I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument,on oath stated he/she/they was/were authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the and_ _of to be the free and voluntary act of such party/parties for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: • CORPORATE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING )SS On this day of ,19 ,bef re me personally appeared to me known to be of the corporation that executed the within PA U L E. MORROW m ent,and acknowledge the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation,for the uses and purposes therein mentioned,and STATE OF WASHINGTON each on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the . a r ed is the corpo to seal of said corporation. NOTARY- PUBLIC ' MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 7-15-00 No Public in f r e State Washington • Notary(Print) My appointment �expires: Dated: I ' 1�P` I 1114 EXHIBIT"A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Must be stamped by a P.E. or L.S.) WATER MAIN EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF PARCEL 2, CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT No.LLA-052-90, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING No. 9011019001,RECORDS OF KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2; THENCE NORTH 29°56'09"EAST ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2 AND ALONG THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF MAPLE AVENUE SOUTHWEST,A DISTANCE OF 210.56 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 15.00 FEET OF SAID PARCEL 2 AND TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 29°56'09"EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE AND ALONG SAID STREET MARGIN,A DISTANCE OF 17.07 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2; THENCE SOUTH 88°35'21"EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF, A DISTANCE OF 332.87 Al FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2 AND TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF gri HARDIE AVENUE SOUTHWEST; THENCE SOUTH 22°06'23"EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2 AND SAID WESTERLY STREET MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 16.36 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 15.00 FEET OF SAID PARCEL 2; THENCE NORTH 88°35'21"WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 144.73 FEET; THENCE SOUTH O1°24'39"WEST A DISTANCE OF 22.27 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°35'21"WEST A DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01°24'39"EAST A DISTANCE OF 22.27 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°35'21"WEST A DISTANCE OF 187.81 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. c ' rd® • MRCS r. -• ,,J v \e2 H:\FILE.SYS\FRM\03EASEMN\0013.DOC\ Page 4 FORM 03 0013/bh/CA2-21-97 •• • Map Exhibit • • o� 5; •4 6l. O' N zx° 5�06 .1• t636 • w fro, Q 3 � itq 'N n Im f ^ m I c N Z I O N I V I r• 3 w'1 • �ti • �N Y 3 s Z • • h . •E Z • • rd sso` 2 ti H:\FILE.SYS\FRM\03EASEMN\0013.DOC\ Page 5 FORM 03 0013/bh/CA2-21-97 WA •940 •.!59 , Si4 A ADEVELOPMENT S LCITY OF RI+N ON PLANNING CARBON • /71 AUG 1 1998 ANTHROPOLOGICAL Il S LIVED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SERVICES August 7, 1998 Mr. Kenneth E. Peckham Schneider Homes, Incorporated 6510 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 1 Tukwila, Washington 98188 RE: Cultural Resource Monitoring for Construction Excavation of the Schneider Homes Renton Apartments Project, King County Larson Anthropological Archaeological Services Limited (LAAS) was retained by Schneider Homes, Incorporated, to monitor construction excavation for the proposed Schneider Homes Renton Apartments Project on the Ozbolt Property in Renton, King County, Washington. The project is on the west edge of an old channel of the Black River, now Hardie Avenue SW, in the SW 1/4, Section 18, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, Willamette Meridian(Figure 1). Cultural resource monitoring recommendations were extended in a cultural resources assessment conducted for the Schneider Homes Renton Apartments Project in 1996 (Lewarch et al.). This letter report documents implementations of the recommendations made by LAAS to monitor construction excavation which was conducted between March 30 and May 1, 1998. Monitoring recommendations were made for the project based on the high probability for encountering cultural deposits associated with the Sbabadid Site (45KI51) (Figure 2). The Sbabadid Site (45KI51) was first recorded in 1979 and contains archaeological deposits with at least three house structures or temporary shelters and associated midden deposits dating between AD 1790 and AD 1865 (Chatters 1981; Reid 1991). However, Lynn Larson(1988) noted that not all cultural deposits associated with the Sbabadid Site (45KI51) may date to the 1800s, with the possibility of both earlier and later occupations. Small reconnaissance efforts conducted since 1988 have been associated with development of the Ozbolt Property which contains part of the Sbabadid Site. Archaeologists recovered a fragment of human bone and possible grave goods (Stump 1990:1), in the vicinity of an oak tree within the central portion of the site in 1990. Sbabadid Site(45KI51) cultural deposits were identified in the Schneider Homes Renton Apartments project area during archaeological backhoe trenching associated with the LAAS cultural resources assessment (Lewarch et al. 1996:9-14) and included an isolated pit feature (Feature 1), a midden deposit with a hearth_feature (Stratum 2.1 and Feature 2), and a midden deposit (Stratum 2.2). Previously documented Sbabadid Site (45KI51)midden deposits are in the eastern portion of the project area in areas that were designated by Chatters (1981:Figure 6) as Midden F and Midden G. P.O. BOX 70106 SEATTLE , ,. WASHINGTON 98107 c TEL [2061 782 . 0980 ,, l , r_ j_ '! . ' -Due to the intensive investigations that have occi3rred.at the Sbabadid Site(45KI51), Lewarch,eta ` �, -cf`' al. (1996:16-18)recommended cultural resource monitoring only in locations within the/Project- area that were adjacent tq known archaeological deposits or were in areas with a'high probability_ ' . for cultural.deposits but.were not previously investigated: The locations recommended for. - - •• , - , Monitoring were subdividedinto areas where monitoring was required`--areas to be evaluated for significance if subsurface disturbance was unavoidable;-and areas:ta,l�e monitored if subsurface -`�": ;�. disturbance was unavoidable (Figure 2)(Lewarch�et al. '1996•t7).{�. _ - ; J..? ,. (. 1 j,'-, , /i.^ f-•, - _ - . - :- PROJECT DESCRIPTION ; ` J ' 'The-•ro'•ect area is composed of a roximatel two acres df a slo d hillside and level flood lain_ 1, ' :;:- terrain. p pP Y pe. hillside p terrain. Two apartment buildings, designated Building A and' Building B,will be constructed, each measuring approximately 9,000 square feet. Parking lots and entrydrives,will be -constructed to both apartment from Hardie Avenue SW and Maple Avenue SW. - `' _.-Because Building A will be on a sloped hillside,grading in the northwest corner removed as = , '?_, much as 12 feet of sediments: For Building B, as much-as six feet of fill was placed on-site: A I, - sanitary sewer line was constructed adjacent to high probability,areas in the eastern portion of the t- project area. T_ he sanitary sewerwas excavated between three and seven feet in depth and is 170 r _ - - feet in length. i_ - " l ` C . J i _ - . FIELD MONITORING s , _ MONITORING TECHNIQUES , , _ - .. , I Project designs were developed by Schneider Homes to diminish construction impacts to the _- 7 Sbabadid Site (45KI51)by avoiding previously,identified cultural deposits documented by , ` `': -Lewarch et al. (1996). Cultural deposits were mapped on,plans prior to construction'to identify ' c areas where intact deposits were present to aid construction personnel in avoiding site deposits._ _ r, i I. Construction monitoring occurred during two construction phases,of the_Schneider Homes . - Renton Apartments Project."The first phase consisted of clearing and grubbing to remove trees, brush, and vegetation. The second phase involved grading and filling the project area to construction-elevations. Two pieces ofimachinery were'used for the_first phase,-a Hitachi EX200 , with 42-inch wide bucket and.a 4300 Linkbelt with a"claw clearing attachment':" The Linkbelt ' :.- = was used to extract and remove vegetation on the property. A Caterpillar-D7 bulldozer-was-I, - employed for grading and:filling. Field monitoring methods consisted of direct observation of , grading and excavating, examination of sediments exposed during excavation and. of soil that • - ' was redeposited in backdirt piles. Representatives of the Duwamish Tribe and Muckleshoot -. Tribe were contacted prior to each phase_of work:.On five occasions,James Rasmussen Of the - - Duwamish Tribe was on-site during construction monitoring. Mr. Rasmussen interacted with the, ' _ ' - archaeologist and provided helpful comments, concerns, and suggestions about the project�and �_ - 2V � ` r ` ✓ '� 1 ^1 to \ i , (am � `, t � .I . ) 1 L, _ • • -` 1 A ✓ -- /( - . . _ - ' _ ' ,, rJ �' ` i --- •ter .� ' 1 ' �, -`-- �� `•', 2- ,I \:1' "�I 7,1, '- previous,Sbabadid Site excavations:'Detailed notes were taken recording the location, type and ; ' ' depth of-ground disturbance; and presence or absence of cultural,materials. Photographs,"were '', ; - .J'taken of all phases of work and representative stratigraphic-exposures. All notes and : t ; ( ' ' photographs are on file at LAAS. -`Date'S'and locatioris`of monitored project sections are listed in - , = , r ,Table 1. ' ;I S MONITORING RESULTS = - J' i, \ . ' , Monitoring was required during the removal of a large oak tree in the vicinity of Building A, and - -` ,-- was conducted during the two phases of work in'the area, clearing and grading.'The oak tree:and 'root system were removed by the'Hitachi backhoe and the tinkbelt on March 30, 1998,,during ' the clearing'and grubbing phase. Grading in the tree vicinity took place on Apri1.7, 1998. The ''. tree measured approximately ten feet in diameter at its base and was largely decayed and burned. • / Table 1. Schneider Homes Renton Apartments Project Cultural Resource Monitoring Locations , Dates of Monitoring Project Location Resources Observed - -:Monitor , v 3-30-98 Oak tree vicinity and eastern project None •• Jeff Robbins and James I - - area clearing and grubbing locations Rasmussen • • : 3-31-98 Oak tree vicinity and eastern project CCS lithic debitage Jeff Robbins and James - • '- - _ - . - area clearing and grubbing locations - - Rasmussen 4-1-98 Oak tree vicinity and eastern project None - _ Jeff Robbins — ' area-clearing and grubbing locations - 4-3-98 General site vicinity walkover None Jeff Robbins - - - - 4-7-98 Oak tree vicinity Cobble chopper Jeff Robbins 4-10-98- • General site vicinity walkover • Jeff Robbins and James Rasmussen 4-20-98 Oak.tree vicinity None Jeff Robbins • 4-30-98 Building B Sanitary Sewer None Jeff Robbins and'James - -- - Rasmussen ' 5-1-98 Building B Sanitary Sewer None -- Jeff.Robbins and James J Rasmussen v Ivy covered much of the tree and only limited portions of the upper branches appeared alive -, - The tree was initially pulled down, exposing the trunk base to a height of approximately one , meter above surface. The trunk was then pulled apart in sections, exposing sediments. - - _Numerous mammalian faunal remains were-exposed during trunk removal, indicating a possible _ modern den was within the trunk.-The trunk and much of the root system were then"raked"by the Linkbelt-'s-claw attachment, which brought large wood to the surface, and created soil -- exposures.;Sediments exposed consisted of brown and dark brown silts and silty loans with_ . assorted cobbles and boulders, and yellowish tan sandy silt with assorted rock at a depth of approximately 80 centimeters.. The estimated area affected by tree removal excavation was. , r , approximately 75 square,meters. -- i _ V i" __ The northeast portion of the project area including the former area of the oak tree was graded, . - - • - . - with a bulldozer on April 7, 1998, Bulldozer cuts as deep'as two feet were made in-repeated; passes over the entire area until approximately six-feet of sediments in the vicinity of the tree ;- - were removed. Each pass of graded material was observed for cultural material standing • -" - - 3 ; ' ;..� j r •� , C. J , 3 , ,K '1 i -. • , (C directly next to graded areas. A cobble chopper was recovered within one exposure. -Graded \ ' - ` backdirt piles Were pushed downslope into the BuildingB Vicinity,where theywere directly 1-1 . ' p P tY� Y observed for any cultural material: Topsoils in upper elevations were removed,quickly in the ' oak tree vicinity, exposing yellowish tan silty glacial sediments. Approximately-150 square „ ; r meters of area around the former oak tree were monitored during grading. f , No grading or excavation was conducted for areasidentified by--Lewarch et al:(1996:17),as.areasi' to be evaluated for significance"if subsurface disturbance was unavoidable: These areas included - '' Stratum 2.1 and Midden F and Midden G(Figures:2 and 3): Fill was placed over these areas to " --increase surface elevations for Building B and a parking lot. Although no grading or excavation ` - - - took place near Stratum 2.1 'and Midden F and Midden G, possible impact's to these areas from '` heavy machinery used in timber cutting and brush clearing were monitored. A large row of ` cottonwood trees were cut and-removed on the eastern border of the property near a drainage - ditch adjacent to Hardie Avenue SW during the clearing and grubbing phase.'The trees were :_ felled into the Building B vicinity near or sometimes over the surface of Stratum 2.1, Midden F, and Midden G areas. Surface transects were traversed to insure that no artifacts were exposed by ` Linkbelt tread exposures near Stratum 2,1;Midden F, and Midden G when the trees were - _ - -removed to Hardie-Avenue SW. Dry conditions prevailed during clearing and grubbing phases, 1` ✓ • - so machinery track-exposures were limited in depth. Track exposures adjacent to Stratum 211, Midden F, and Midden G were generally 10-20 centimeters in depth and did not contain cultural - material. ,Soil exposures in these areas_consisted of light brown silts and sandy silts with little or : no rock material. Subsurface exposures created by tree removal directly adjacent to,Hardie Avenue SW showed fill sediments in general such as mottled brown silts and sands with gravels, _ imported rock and-rubble. Substantial filling west of Hardie Avenue SW appears to have been-in -- , associated with the road and drainage ditch parallel to the road.- ` -:- - - - A single piece of cryptocrystallirie silica.(CCS) debitage was_observed in a surface exposure T ` approximately 10 meters northwest of Midden G following the removal of a small tree-during �, clearing and grubbing (Figure 3). No cultural stratigraphy was observed that was associated with , the artifact. Personal communication with the former property_,owner,-Svado-Ozbolt, -� documented in'Lewarch et al. (1996-:4)indicated that some filling,plowing, this vicinity and disking has _f, _= - occurred in- a`The flake'was probably redeposited in the plow zone:_The CCS flake • and-the cobble chopper identified during grading of the oak tree vicinity have been curated and " .- - are included with this report: - . - - Monitoring also occurred in the southeastern corner'of the property for excavation of a 170-foot . - '- long sewage line that was"constructed from,Hardie Avenue SW to Building B. Trench _ - excavation for-the pipeline•occurred between April 30 and-May 1, 1998. Trench depth varied- - between three and seven feet in depth and the trench was generally four feet wide. All sidewall , _ --- exposures created during excavation of the sanitary sewer pipeline were examined-and no . cultural material or strata was encountered. Gravel deposits from the Black River were - - encountered at'depths.of 1:2 meters below surface within trench exposures near Hardie Avenue e_ _ _ SW and extended 20 meters west of the road. Stratified silt and sand deposits were noted -- : throughout the trench exposure but were-devoid of any cultural material, most notably within one - meter of previously identified Midden G deposits. - 1 - --, • (_ - -' V. - .. r . - .J ' - '.. U _ c ' J ! . '', V CONCLUSIONS -C I' - Site preparation and'construction excavation for the Schneider Homes Renton Apartments Project on the Ozbolt Property wa"s monitored by LAAS archaeologist Jeff Robbins between March-30 and May.1;1998. No significant`cultaral•deposits associated with the Sbabadid Site = \ - `(45KI51)were'identified during the project. Two-lithic artifacts were recovered'during. construction monitoring. The artifacts have been curated and aremc1uded with this report. ' ' r - -, 4 - Please call if you have any questions. _ , Sincerely,:_ I' _ ' r r t' '1 Jeffrey R. Robbins ' Archaeologist __ - )- -' 3 Lynn L. Larson . - - ; Principal Investigator- - - r ' ,- _ _ - _ - - J - - .f - - ^ -- 1 - - �- ` - -' cc: Dr. Robert Whitlam, State Archaeologist, Office of Archaeology-and Historic Preservation James Rasmussen, Duwainish-Tribe , - - -_Walter Pacheco,Muckleshoot Tribe 1 • - - _ ' Peter Rosen, Senior Planner, City of Renton Development Services . - - - Charles Payton, King County cultural Resources Division r11. , c I - r— t r / �' i• ' ' - )`11 ' - : ; � '- G )3IBLIOGRAPIIY ' r, . l _ , _ } rr 1); Chatters, James C. c• I ( ' j ' ) >r( : `1981�, -iAr`chaeo'logy of the�Sbabadid i n 1 r u�Public - - �` Ste '4,SKI51, King County, Washington:-Office of Public � ` -,;. ,_- . Archaeolo University of Washington, Seattle. On file at.Washington Stater Office;of '_; - gY�- Archaeology and Historic Preservation. ` ` -`, - �( `l r- ,., ,.) y ` �� - ') • . - - .�:. ✓ -t J., - - ),, . 'l , '- ( ', H•, - 1, 1. ' - j ' Larson Lynn L. , . ; S - r 1988 Cultural Resource Investigation of a Proposed Warehouse_in Renton,•King County, - - Washington:' Larson"Anthropological%Archaeological Services, Seattle. Submitted to , _ , Public Storage, Incorporated,Renton,-Washington: ;r l " - i , ' ?J t Lewarch Dennis E. Lynn L. Larson W.\Bangs. r.- - • • . 1996' Cultural Resources Assessment of the Schneider Homes Renton Apartments Project, , ` I _ -Renton, King`County, Washington. Letter report from Larson Anthropological/ - ' Archaeological Services,Seattle, to Kenneth E. Peckham, Schneider Homes, _ - Incorporated,Tukwila, Washington, July 17. ' - J- - ;J j J -Reid,Alfred - ' , - ._ _ . - 1991 • Archaeological Monitoring at Sbabadid Site (4S•KIS1)During the Earlington Woods. Development Project, 1990. Submitted to Holly Corporation, Tacoma, Washington,'- Contract No::947001. On file at Washington,State Office of Archaeology and Historic f . Preservation.. - f '` _Stump, Sheila _ = : 1990'. Letter report from BOAS, Inc., Seattle,to Gregory Steinhauer, Gregory Development ' 'Company, Bellevue, Washington,31 December. On file at Washirigtori'State Office of-- - - Archaeology and Historic Preservation. \-- ', ti . l '! I ) �, r . - r!. C t. ,/ ( , )7 ws,. Tang ",,.:,...,,TvL,„..11._ ..,„ ...-.,... •'.‘...1100.414-1;;:s:', (3- ,...:....rot 1... ..I..77.:EONIIIIVIIIIIII ii. I; ..„ pka "7,,t4 . watil.-__. • -ler mumjii.,, .-1 .. ..•-•.- 1 .14.3% ‘4 At' \., \ 1k11001.0.10111: ,i-,•'•:8'; 1,. • _ ,,,S ' i• , .7 , , , t t •. 11 . 11111111111111 ( ,;TA 6, ,, ..„.,..„.,..,!.. . I, ...iL,..v,1 ... . •‘... . . ..,. .. 4 . ii.• • . \ \ mirimimmir -,..,,---, ‘ k• ' '-4•101frkr..1, ) ' .`NwalliVia.'".... - ', ', % .,f..:.,. " --------- • 1 . ,N ,•-•-r::' ' ' ,.,io,;;---4:,;,::: 4 1;114,1 II(\ m'I‘ljai'mmi..11111k:',s 7 '' '''k.A. III '-'151 A ' ,,,.., el, '1•:), ,,,'!„ oni;:24. 1, C......,-\ Tit , , ,.,„ • 1 p--:.• ---- it se,i.,. , ••• ,----, -----z,,,, i le ; 1.).,- . .113- • , i ', \\\ INI.-iih,,,lifr - -1 ,'., ;, ,... ,wiim, : la ..-_, :. Id •.:7.;/[1: •' p ; d 1 . 1.) ,- 1Z,,n_ 13116, , 'i • •. .- . - : i, . y ii • • ,i /1.• / '1 '• • st* IT ,)\'' ''''‘.41-410 •• - c"' cr..' • TO/si ' i ,- `‘' IN i • , - • --',.. ('-- At ' ,‘ , ,.i_...:-.•_, ';,'• lilt ."' 1 ..111_,I; A , 1 R'ORT • • 1 1 1:. ' .1 II ''' • , , •, I • -. 17,,t!r/ y' k., ;:-....3--,„ ir ef• 1-''' i I . . __-__. 11.:Al• 111 ! '•„.111111111k,k t....-___i_. , , 1 4-- •..), : . . .....,„, • ,,,,,,,,, .. r---,,, •.1 Illi,,,_, i,ktt,„ !,,,,,, 4114i •I .-- , ‘ 1 lc -.,11 11 . .. •-,:- ' . . 13m`.' , pflyitifstikitlia 4.- , ..„ ,.i ni, , 't\t°, ...._ s . —1 'iktl: . .'-0fi'il 11111110ir lit. fr.001 •' - 1/1"111 ,..„,.../4--,---------14.,41 ...._.... .1 tt 1 I :0 VA ! s 0 ,.,,..,,,I,,4'...\sk,,,itt L 11 ' : • '11___ . -,'„. ' will ...... ,-- ,., • in i I 'PA* •Illm ,„..i.... . ....!ft . . — ,...... .,...,,..„- --s110, •:•aseinat , - -V---- ----- .. tit. Park • • -...,„,....... .,"__ ...,.-..„... .,,•,....001,-,...... ,.. i fi ;:. , :- •-:,-..-21.-.---.._-----.7::::;„----4t,Viisii../. 6.. ---- -'' .' ' "'-' ' ' • ' ‘•- -,--- ,,,‘\ -----,_:-- . ito . i . .A— I r il I . • ,‘ '' .'...S'ezt ......--e" .,.-••'-'. "•-•-. ';',. • 411"get,...„...• 0111114•1 i.,, ?a".„•,'/.1",. ',..-.la'I , - ..io...... . . ..-..r,,, : .:: -s. " ' • -,-,"..,..:',,-,....-.RAILROAD '•"1:\,. -''''",,,_FP2tSretnllie 1•,i..`;i:',.\• 9 '.:I, ,1., -.--:-.. '`Altil 4 y•r, •.,, Project Area [PER /r .' --.-',.i.- , fVel,:°----- ,(L-----6*-1-4N. '.62,9. . 17 •• '' A. •-...:,•6 .,,,- . --,..,----.-. Imolai cv, *1\-.Q,"-i,,-,•••-•.."'„. ,-,--- ,•.,)t , • ,...„ _ 1,..:_e.- / - -- • - . ' pp 1 ..... -- :•, ' ..,,..:,, k /----- \• 45KI51 . -- • ••••• ..,'\ 7- - C": . 111 1 , i) i 4 cl.'5' ) _ _ _ .-"'"•-:"--.1.•:.‘,...t--- . la% S:. - . , lk .• \ • ----- .. t - -, ..... •\1 -,,, , . .,. 6,•ez_ ...' .: ••.,... . !.UN 1 II T••• I 'lw A5--" . o ‘ ; A j.._, .• , .. _ r-4.- -...,,-1 .„( .. ... -7:141: ' 71 It : ,,,,!::,1§ 1, 40,% 1_ :z ..._,...„,_ tt ,: .,( o. 1t,. ,,,i1L:1--,lr---::.• P . : , : •- --1. ... - ,- 1 'cNi'•'7 ,- \ i _ . — • • . c'! : ^ft---- .. r-,.-: :2::---- t,.: ,,... vok!:,',, 'e•,-,age % ,.,I iiii-- ,... . ...-- ....-4----1. •, ,,, „Ir. ., , . . ..-: ., ,..,-- j ...7-4 r-,IL. ,,,,,...,1,,'_._ii -.'(,1 'IA:/ , .I 1(; i 1 . , \1 V ,....1,i \.,' I,. ; I*, • , N -' "s. 1::--':2:— ''' • .-. .- C:::,-.3". 1 '1... ..", ...—44P1‘7,-......-'-+::,--;'0-....'1 s.l. 4-=',: , • • 'J '.;‘,• \\\ ''' ,,,,.; \,..:\ _._ . .. -•. — ir/-77.2 - : ,.; ,„,,t„,, :,•‘!„ , ,... ..1.. . ,,,t .1.• r, --,-•- t4v. , _,...,- ..- : • . mi. .-'..1. 1-1-1. rht.,. ..... ., "---..4.,,.. . • m is 1 ,:,.. '.. •;=, I I .-tts. .-vi'..,',, • ''‘-!.:-•,,;!.,*A. ki 'k, ,; ,r, ; , , '''.1••••.. ,.I, ;.... " .... , i ,..... ;-7 V '. %:i7k4.i•--414;••••• *..• t5:- *2'\`'. '. ..' . LorigacreIX : ', N :: \I— 1• .Stg .. :\/.. •a! ••.'.7. if 1 ... s-- . `, sl`s• : ; . ..... ' V 1 • fterr. ' , I - ,,,..„1,, •c• 11:,,,\:\l, \ 1...•,..-- r.--,4,...\,-;• • ,'.: •• I._ oi , :Ial gsx "- . j 6V-.."'\\sir i% IN r .,.--%.-1 rz-... ..,. ..- !,-.---i y! .r...... "N, ) I OA e , ..J: _.. 1 \,r 1...„ ... ;,—— ..../ . .;. ,\. , • ,D; .. ..., • t...1• :, +. ..,...-, .,... . \ \\,\ ,, • . r:e.,.... ) ,,• loy ,\ .si 1 • . Track ; •••••.. • /\ 0 1000I I 2000 I N Feet Base Map USGS Renton,Washington 7.5'Quadrangle, 1973. Figure 1. Project location. / / Entrance SW 4th Place Stratum 2.1 Sik J -5. co .. , . . -6` Midden F 1. c� S 1 , cry 4 k , Entrance ��\a�o� Q� ���a� Midden G —:::. ).. ' , Project Area Boundary Oak Tree C) Areas to be evaluated for significance if subsurface disturbance is unavoidable /\ 0 100 /'�'♦ Area to be monitored if subsurface N I I I �._.� Monitoring required � --- disturbance is unavoidable Feet Figure 2. Monitoring recommendations for the proposed Schneider Homes Renton Apartments Project on the Ozbolt Property. Entrance Stratum 2.1 SW 4th Place Graded •: ' " Areas �• y •i� 3. �• • • Filled• Midden F C0 CO� Areas I- �O oN.I • Gw cb • •c`t)� I I •I . N� `� i cDQ Qom` ♦i• �'& • ,. �° 'b Midden G Entrance •• \• •0 •• Q�� %*W � '�f ....�♦ • Q� •.• CCS 741) Manhole Mnitored location of Area monitored during clearing Bding B Sanitary Sewer and grubbing phase of work Area Boundary 0 Oak Tree N proximate boundary between filled and graded areas Area that was monitored 0 30 I Location of CCS Lithic (7..:":11APIplject # where subsurfaceMeterCCS material recovered . 1 Approximate total size of area disturbance was from surface exposure •♦�� monitored in oak tree vicinity unavoidable 0 i 100 Feet Figure 3. Monitoring locations within the Schneider Homes Renton Apartments Project on the Ozbolt Property. 0 King County DEVELOPMENT PLANNING Metro Transit Division CITY OF RENTON Design and Construction Section,Environmental Planning and Real Estate �. n 1�t MAY997 Department of Transportation U 821 Second Avenue M.S.122 ^ Seattle,WA 98104-1598 T e P"5 (206)684-1418 A^ -l Y 1, E D (206) 684-1900 FAX May 27, 1997 City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Peter Rosen, Project Manager 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 MDNS, Ozbolt Condominiums, LUA-96-159,SA,ECF Dear Mr. Rosen: King County Transit Division and Transportation Planning Division staff have reviewed this proposal and have the following comments. Existing transit service to this area is provided by Routes 101, 110, and 143. The nearest bus zone to the complex is located on SW Sunset Blvd. and E Maple Ave. SW, near Fred Myers. Staff recommends that the project proponent provide sidewalks for easy access to transit service on Sunset Blvd. For further questions regarding transit service, please call Radford Duckworth, Transit Planner, at 684-2165. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this proposal. Sincerely, l I 2"-I1-- Gary riedt, Environmental Planner Environmental Planning and Real Estate g:\.oap312.doc AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Kristina Thompson, being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL The Environmental Review Committee Non- 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 (ERC)has issued a Determination o Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton a daily newspaper published seven (7) times a week. Said newspaper is a legal Municipal Code. OZBOLT CONDOMINIUMS newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months LUA-96-159,SA,ECF prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language Environmental review for total of 36 units. continuallyLocas a dailynewspaper in Kent, KingCount Washington. The South Countyation Maple Ave. SW and Hardie Ave. Y, 9 SW. Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the The comment and appeal period for this State of Washington for King County. project will run concurrently. The com- ment/appeal periods for this project will The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County end at 5:00 PM on May 27, 1997. Written Journal (and not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers comments and requests for reconsidera- tionthe below statedperiod. The annexed notice, a shalle be forwarded to the Development during Services Division Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file Notice of Environmental Determination - LUA 96-159, SA. ECF and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the as published on: 5/12/97 Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoi • publication is the sum of$44.92 Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Legal Number 3019 ApealClerk spoff offroceduice, Firsts are aFl000r,vailb inMunicipal the lty fr Building. ,,- 4 O Published in the South County Journal • ..,/) May 12,1997.3019 Lee - ,, South Co v ty Journal Subscribed and sworn before me on this day of Q.A,/, 19 i 7 _____,s,.,, c _ -..a D P4 r •,,•t,..., �•.�� ,r,'. ;11 Notary Public of the State of Washington "'�`-.co,71 residing in Renton *?`° 0_1 A . `r: .l1 King County, Washington jP\ PL` p . t� i l�y,F p.oi CITI. OF RENTON Ni.), Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator June 9, 1997 • Mr. Kenneth Peckham Schneider Homes, Inc. 6510 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 SUBJECT: Ozbolt Condominiums Project No. LUA-96-159,SA,ECF • Dear Mr. Peckham • This letter is to inform you that the comment and appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed. This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures and Site Plan Conditions of Approval. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 235-2719. For the Environmental Review Committee, PlgtAL, Peter Rosen Project Manager FINAL.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ...- . . . . - • • 7Washington State Northwest Region 1 Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North Sid Morrison P.O.Box 330310 • • Seattle,WA 98133-9710 Secretary of Transportation • • (206)440-4000 • RECEIVED DATE: May 30, 1997 JUN 0 a 1997 TO: Mark Pywell DEVELOPMENT PLANNING City of Renton, Project Manager CITY of RE=NTON 200 Mill Avenue South Renton WA .98055 • Subject: SR 900 MP 9.71 CS 1712 Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance-Ozbolt • • Condominiums-36 units File No.LUA-96-159,SA,ECF • I�Pd 4 FROM: Robert A. Josephson, PE, Manager of Planning &Local Coordination Washington State Department of Transportation Northwest Region 15700 Dayton Avenue North, MS 122 . • P. O. Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review this project, which is located at 430 Maple Avenue SW. Our response is below: We have reviewed the subject document and have no further comments. The project will have no significant impact on the state highway system. However, if the developer mitigates traffic impacts by adding right or left turn lanes on SR 900 we will need to review the channelization plan for our approval, along with the traffic impact analysis. If you have any questions,please contact Don Hurter at 440-4664 or Vickie Erickson at 440-4915 of my Developer Services section VEE:vee File Name -• • CITY OF RENTON ................. CURRENT PLANNING AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the €56 day of , 1997, I deposited in the mails of the United States,.a sealed envelope containing t ERC. clectermttv.iusYrs. 4 Report e"a Peels documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing ICev\v41-1n Pec-kleto-vv‘ ScAnv\e..t ci ex- iinWtet V . ad . Salvo 01-6,01t • VV‘tvl‘sAe.' LU.a -11,NOWN 173%01E1 •• - • •(Signature of Sender) Savkdita. V . SeocePreir STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Ci 1-7‘f bRA- e signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: Notary Pu if in and fort e State of Wqttiii,dtdel',_ ••• • • z. Notary (Print) frhAleSt-R/ET My appointment expires: vio • • 0 '•!•. . • • ,.„ '' ' • Project Name: z.bo+ C01.401mkh1U..tinA% Project Number: LUN clip • 169,SP. - NOTARY.DOC • a , REPORT City of Renton & Department of Planning/Building/Public Works DECISION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW& ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION REPORT DATE: May 6, 1997 Project Name: Ozbolt Condos Applicant: Schneider Homes Owner: Salvo and Lucy Ozbolt File Number: LUA-096-159, SA, ECF Project Manager. Peter Rosen Project Description: Proposal to construct two separate buildings, each containing 18 condominium units, for a project total of 36 units. The buildings would be 2 1/2 stories with a maximum building height of 35 feet. The proposal includes 66 parking stalls with 32 provided as covered garage stalls. Access is proposed via driveways off Maple Avenue SW and Hardie Avenue SW. Project Location: 430 Maple Avenue SW Exist. Bldg. Area SF: NA Proposed New Bldg. Area SF: 53,604 s.f. Site Area: l - 1.99 acres, 86,710 s.f. Total Building Area SF: 53,604 s.f. �i,1ll���tLj II . ■ - S 2nd • ST III al / 1,..ii Am �ill lll� ��IJ1�44�`.'TON S 11111111 INN �. 3rd S _ • • �1-Itti1 kt ♦ • ■!!1!l m am Ina zuz C ,7 .Ilf %pair $14iii, et4P*''d i NS* . . I g E.9 si a :;- , ._III.. - ` •. ,7., r, _ *Z.fir Spivoaf 4 NW. P. _ op�i�► V Il1l/01 Allay ttth v:, sif to life17.r. i • , _.....i ..::-. ........' •••_,..... . 1 Z jog iiii i. 00001110110 ill= =E-1, -17-= ==. y 0_ 7 • SW • 7th ST AS' =Ia. r ='-:= i i i i• i i I ... ... P—' Project Location Map ERCSITE2.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department EnWI ental Review Committee Staff Report OZBOLT CONDOMINIUMS LUA-96-159, SA,ECF REPORT OF MAY 6, 1997 Page 2 of 18 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant seeks environmental review and administrative Site Plan Review to construct two separate buildings, each containing 18 condominium units, for a project total of 36 units. The buildings would be 2 1/2 stories with a maximum building height of 35 feet. The buildings each have 3 sections, with a section containing 6 condo units, 2 units stacked on each story. There is no offset or articulation of the building footprint, which is approximately 150 feet long. The two upper story units are accessed from an outside stairwell located in the middle of each section. The units are two bedrooms and range in size from 1,000.to.1,200 square feet. The buildings are both fronted by covered parking spaces which provides for convenient parking and access to the units, though the garages block the view of the front entry of the 2 first floors of the buildings. 34 open parking stalls are also proposed, for a total of 66 parking spaces. The proposal includes approximately 14,449 square feet of open space area. Each of the buildings back onto an area of common open space. According to the submitted plans, it appears that the ground floor units have direct access to the common open space. However, the open space is not fenced or landscaped to serve the individual units. Most of the open space area behind Building B is devoted to a stormwater biofiltration swale. Both of the open space areas are not designed as useable open space for either individual units or for common use of residents of the proposed development. Access is proposed via driveways off Maple Avenue SW and Hardie Avenue SW. The project includes a 20 foot wide landscape strip fronting Maple Avenue SW. A 20 foot wide drive goes around the north end of Building #1 and connects to the parking area for Building #2 and continues out to Hardie Avenue SW. PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW A. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: (1) Earth Impacts: The site slopes down gradually from west to east off Maple Avenue SW. According to the applicant, the steepest slope on the site is approximately 10%. According to the environmental checklist, on-site grading is anticipated to involve approximately 500 cubic yards of material. The applicant has not provided a conceptual grading plan with the application submittal. The application indicates the soil material would remain on-site, it does not indicate if fill material would be imported to the site. Potential erosion impacts that could occur during site preparation and construction would be mitigated by City Code requirements for measures addressed in a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) and a Construction Mitigation Plan. ERCSITE2.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Envii ental Review Committee Staff Report OZBOLT CONDOMINIUMS LUA-96-159, SA,ECF REPORT OF MAY 6, 1997 Page 3 of 18 Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation measures are required. Standard Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control (TESC) measures will be required conditions of Building and Construction permits. Policy Nexus: NA (2) Air Impacts: Impacts to air'quality can be anticipated during-construction and after occupancy of the:proposed project. Impacts during construction would.include increased levels of airborne particulates (especially dust) from disturbance•of exposed soils and emissions from construction equipment exhaust. The applicant:.has,submitted a;construction mitigation plan stating that dust generation would be minimized by frequently watering the site during construction. Exhaust from construction vehicles is regulated by State and City Codes. After construction, impacts would be primarily associated with residential traffic. These vehicular emissions are subject to State emission standards and would have a minor impact on overall air quality, not considered significant to warrant special mitigation measures. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. Policy Nexus: NA (3) Water Impacts: The applicant has indicated that there are no wetlands located on the site and the site does not lie within the 100-year floodplain.. The environmental,checklist states that 40% of the site would be covered in impervious surfaces. Runoff from the proposed development would be collected by a series of pipes and catch basins within paved areas. A detention vault and bioswale are proposed for water quality treatment and quantity control. These stormwater facilities are located at the east end of the property. The post-development stormwater would discharge to the same downstream conveyance facilities as the pre-developed conditions. The stormwater detention and water quality system will be required to meet those standards of the King County Surface Water Design Manual as adopted by the City. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. Policy Nexus: NA (4) Fire Protection Impacts: The proposal would add new construction to the City which would potentially impact the City's Fire Department. A Fire Mitigation Fee would apply to all new construction at a rate of$388 per multi-family unit, for an estimated total of$13,968 (36 units X$388 = $13,96). The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable at the time of issuance of Building Permits. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee of$388.00 per unit. This fee is estimated at $13,968.00. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Policy Nexus: Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution and adopting Ordinance, SEPA Ordinance. ERCSITE2.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Envi► ental Review Committee Staff Report OZBOLT CONDOMINIUMS LUA-96-159, SA,ECF REPORT OF MAY 6, 1997 Page 4 of 18 (5) Transportation Impacts: Access to the project is proposed via driveways off Maple Avenue SW and Hardie Avenue SW. The proposed multi-family development would result in an increase in traffic trips and therefore would be subject to the City's Transportation Mitigation Fee. The trip generation values are based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual and staff estimates 6.47 average daily trips per unit or 232.9 for the total project. The Transportation Mitigation Fee is calculated to be $75 per each average daily trip attributable to the-project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated to be $17,467.50. The applicant has submitted a Construction Mitigation Plan-which states that the transport of materials to and from the site would be directed:to major transportation routes to lessen impacts on the adjoining neighborhood. Construction-related:truck.•traffic.could impact traffic flows if occurring during peak traffic flow periods. This truck traffic should be limited to off-peak hours. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated to be $17,467.50. This fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Haul hours for construction-related truck traffic shall be restricted from 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development.Services Division. Policy Nexus: Transportation Mitigation Fee Ordinance, SEPA Ordinance. (6) Parks and Recreation Impacts: The applicant is proposing to construct 36 multi-family units. There are no recreational facilities or useable open space areas proposed on the subject site. The future residents would need to use the existing and proposed recreation facilities located throughout the City. In order to mitigate for impacts to the City of Renton's recreation facilities, the City requires a mitigation fee of$354.51 per multi-family dwelling unit. The mitigation fee for the proposal is estimated at$12,762.36. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay a Park's Department mitigation fee of$354.51 per multi-family dwelling unit. The mitigation fee for the proposal is estimated at $12,762.36. This mitigation fee shall be submitted prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Policy Nexus: Park Mitigation Fee Ordinance, SEPA Ordinance. 7) Historic and Cultural Resources Impacts: Cultural resources have been found on the project site and in the immediate vicinity of the site. The cultural materials are part of the Sbabadid Site (45KI51), an archaeological site which is probably eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) because of the site's potential to contribute information important to regional prehistory. The Sbabadid site also has heritage value for the Muckleshoot Tribe and Duwamish Tribal Organization. A cultural resources assessment was conducted on the site in July 1996 by Larson Anthropological Archaeological Services. Backhoe trenches were excavated based on the proposed site plan and the trenching followed the proposed building foundations. The study provides specific recommendations for minimizing and mitigating identified impacts to cultural resources on the site. ERCSITE2.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Envir 3ntal Review Committee Staff Report OZBOLT CONDOMINIUMS LUA-96-159, SA,ECF REPORT OF MAY 6, 1997 Page 5 of 18 The following summary discusses only those cultural deposits that were identified as significant in the report and for which the report recommends specific mitigations in order to avoid impacts. Further information about other areas of cultural deposits that were identified and evaluated on the site may be referenced in the Larson report which is a part of the official project file. 1) Oak Tree and Vicinity-There is an oak tree in the center of the site around which a fragment of a human bone and possible grave goods were recovered by BOAS, Incorporated in 1990. BOAS conducted a cultural resource assessment of the Ozbolt property but did not-produce a formal report of the research. The potential for human remains near the oak tree is a concern of the Muckleshoot Tribe and Duwamish Tribal Organization. Larson investigated this area and found no evidence of burials or isolated human remains or artifacts in backhoe trenches or on exposed ground:surfaces near the oak tree. In the proposed site plan, the oak tree is located within the building footprint of Building A and would be removed during construction excavation. Larson recommends a conservative approach due to previous findings near the oak tree and recommends monitoring construction excavation with a professional archaeologist and a tribal monitor on the site. 2) Stratum 2.1 and Feature 2 - These cultural deposits may be older than archaeological deposits currently documented for the Sbabadid Site and may provide information important to prehistory. Most of the deposits are over one meter below the ground surface and would not be directly impacted if the depth of construction excavation is limited. According to the proposed site plan, this area is located northwest of the footprint and foundation of Building B and is proposed for parking. The Larson report recommends that precaution be taken to avoid disturbing the deposits, and the construction be redesigned if excavation is planned in the area to depths greater than 75 centimeters (29.5 inches) below the ground surface. The applicant has sent a letter to the file indicating that excavation depths in this area would not exceed 2 to 2 1/2 feet. Prior to issuance of Building or Construction Permits, the applicant should provide City staff with detailed grading plans and point elevations in this area of concern. If construction excavation is found to exceed depths greater than 75 centimeters, then issuance of Building and Construction permits should be delayed until a testing program is completed. Archaeological testing would be necessary to determine the significance of the midden deposits through the evaluation of age and composition of the midden and to determine if additional features are present. If the deposits are significant, a data recovery program would be required to mitigate disturbance of the deposits. Consultation with the Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, the Muckleshoot Tribe, and the Duwamish Tribal Organization would be required during formulation of the testing plan and development of a data recovery program. 3) Areas F and G -Areas F and G are located along the east portion of the site, and were identified in previous studies (Chatters, 1981) as part of the Sbabadid Site and are probably eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. The Larson study did not conduct trenching in this area of the site because their field investigation was limited to evaluating areas of proposed building footprints. The conceptual utility plan indicates that stormwater facilities, the bioswale and underground detention vault may located over Areas F and G. The Larson report states that the midden deposits are over 50 centimeters below the ground surface and should not be adversely affected if excavation does not extend to depths greater than 25 centimeters (9.8 inches). The applicant has not provided sufficient detailed information to ascertain if ERCSITE2.DOC f City of Renton P/B/PW Department .. _ Envii ants/Review Committee Staff Report OZBOLT CONDOMINIUMS LUA-96-159,SA,ECF REPORT OF MAY 6, 1997 Page 6 of 18 grading or excavation for the stormwater facilities would occur below 25 centimeters in this portion of the site. Prior to issuance of Building or Construction Permits, the applicant should provide City staff with detailed grading plans and point elevations in this area of concern. If construction excavation or grading is found to exceed depths greater than 25 centimeters, then issuance of Building and Construction permits should be delayed until a testing program is completed. Archaeological testingwould be necessary to determine the significance of the midden deposits through the evaluation'of age and composition of the midden and to determine..if additional features are present. 4) .East Edge:of-the Ozbolt Property-.The.Larson report:states:that the..east edge of the property adjacent to the historic channel of the.Black:.River,has:a:high:•probability of buried cultural:deposits.. It is mapped in the Larson report•along.the.:southeast..edge of the property..,It appears that.the'only potential development:disturbance:.would:,be from the utility lines exiting-the.site'at the southeast corner.of..the,propertyr..to:connect.to utility lines in Hardie Avenue SW. The report recommends that if construction excavation in this area is planned at depths below 25 centimeters, that the excavations be monitored by a professional archaeologist. If cultural deposits are identified, a testing program may be carried out to evaluate significance. Mitigation Measures: 1. Oak Tree and Vicinity: Removal of the oak tree and construction:excavation in the _.. _vicinity-of.the oak tree shall be monitored_by.a'professional:archaeologist-:and a tribal t;..:monitor., If'human.remains::are.identified.during'construction.excavation,..construction would • stop and:the.Washington:State Office of Archaeology.and..Historic:.Preservation, The Muckleshoot Tribe,',and_Duwamish Tribal organization;would=be..consultethregarding an appropriate course of action. 2."Stratum 2.1 and Feature 2: Prior to issuance of_Building'`or.:Construction-Permits, the applicant should provide City staff with detailed grading plans and point elevations in the area identified as Stratum 2.1 and Feature 2. If construction excavation is found to exceed depths greater than 75 centimeters, then issuance of Building and Construction permits shall be delayed until a testing program is completed to determine the potential significance of cultural deposits. 3. Areas F and G: Prior to issuance of Building or Construction Permits, the applicant should provide City staff with detailed grading plans and point elevations in the area identified as Areas F and G. If construction excavation or grading is found to exceed depths greater than 25 centimeters, then issuance of Building and Construction permits should be delayed until a testing program is completed to determine the potential significance of cultural deposits. 4. East Edge of the Ozbolt Property- If excavation for the utility lines in the southeast corner of the site exceeds 25 centimeters, then the excavation should be monitored by a professional archaeologist. Policy Nexus: SEPA Ordinance, RCW 2753 -Archaeological Sites and Records, WAC 25- 48, RCW 2744- Indian Graves and Records. ERCSITE2.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Envii 9nta/Review Committee Staff Report OZBOLT CONDOMINIUMS LUA-96-159,SA,ECF REPORT OF MAY 6, 1997 Page 7 of 18 B. Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE . NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. X Issue DNS-M with.15 day Comment and Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M.with 15 day Comment Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. Mitigation Measures 1. . The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee of$388.00 per unit. This fee is estimated at$13,968.00. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 2.. . The applicant shall.be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation:Fee:of$75.for.each average daily trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated to be $17,467.50. This fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 3. Haul hours for construction-related truck traffic shall be restricted from 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. • 4. The applicant shall pay a Park's Department mitigation fee of$354.51 per multi-family dwelling unit. The mitigation fee for the proposal is estimated at $12,762.36. This mitigation fee shall be submitted prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Archaeological Mitigations 5. Oak Tree and Vicinity: Removal of the oak tree and construction excavation in the vicinity of the oak tree shall be monitored by a professional archaeologist and a tribal monitor. If human remains are identified during construction excavation, construction would stop and the Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, The Muckleshoot Tribe, and Duwamish Tribal organization would be consulted regarding an appropriate course of action. 6. Stratum 2.1 and Feature 2: Prior to issuance of Building or Construction Permits, the applicant should provide City staff with detailed grading plans and point elevations in the area identified as Stratum 2.1 and Feature 2. If construction excavation is found to exceed depths greater than 75 centimeters, then issuance of Building and Construction permits shall be delayed until a testing program is completed to determine the potential significance of cultural deposits. 7. Areas F and G: Prior to issuance of Building or Construction Permits, the applicant should provide City staff with detailed grading plans and point elevations in the area identified as Areas F and G. If construction excavation or grading is found to exceed depths greater ERCSITE2.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Envi► Dntal Review Committee Staff Report • OZBOLT CONDOMINIUMS LUA-96-159, SA,ECF REPORT OF MAY 6, 1997 Page 8 of 18 than 25 centimeters, then issuance of Building and Construction permits should be delayed until a testing program is completed to determine the potential significance of cultural deposits. 8. East Edge of the Ozbolt Property- If excavation for the utility lines in the southeast corner of the site exceeds 25 centimeters, then the excavation should be monitored by a professional archaeologist. • • ERCSITE2.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Envii ental Review Committee Staff Report • OZBOLT CONDOMINIUMS LUA-96-159,SA,ECF REPORT OF MAY 6, 1997 Page 9 of 18 Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. BUILDING 1. Soils engineer required to expand on liquefaction potential. 2. A soils report and compaction tests are required for the revised building layout. FIRE 1.' The preliminary fireflow for Building,One is 2,750 GPM and Building Two.is-2;500 GPM. Three fire hydrants are required'foreach.building, one within 150feet and two-within'3002feet.:„Hydrants within the.required distances may be used for more than one building. 2. Firealarm and'sprinklersystems are required for each building. Separate plan&and,permits are required by the Fire Department. PLAN REVIEW Sewer 1. The System Development Service Connection charge is$12,600. 2. Sewer cleanouts to be located five feet from building. 3. Sewer vertical profile will be required with construction plans. 4. Sewer main to be labeled-"Private." 5. Maintain proper horizontal separation from-water. The minimum-separation.is 10:feet:or greater and'- vertical separation of 18 inches or greater from water. 6. -Side sewer to-have two percent slope. Storm Drainage 1. The System Development Services Connection charge is$7,040.18. 2. A vertical profile will be required with construction plans. 3. Show how many square feet is subject to vehicle use. Water 1. System Development Connection for 36 units is$18,360. 2. The proposed 8-inch water loop system will provide 2,500 gpm. the Fire Department requires a fireflow of 2,750. A 10-inch loop system will provide approximately 4,000 gpm. 3. Fire hydrant locations are not identified on the conceptual utility plan. One fire hydrant will deliver 1,000 gpm. 4. Fire hydrant locations must be approved by the Fire Department. Three hydrants are required. the primary hydrant must be located within 150 feet of the building and two within 300 feet of the building. 5. Water valve locations to be identified. 6. All utility and roadway drawings to meet the City of Renton drafting standards. 7. Show location and size of DCVA for landscaping irrigation and irrigation meter. 8. Show location and size of domestic water meter. 9. Water line loop system must be located in a 15-foot utility easement. 10. A vertical profile will be required with the construction plans. Transportation 1. Curbs, gutters and sidewalks to be provided on both Hardie Ave. SW and on Maple Ave. SW. Curb line to match extended improved street width. These improvements to extend the full width of the property frontage to the roadway. 2. Where the roadway is widened to match existing street, the asphalt overlay must extend to the center of the roadway as shown in the City Standard Drawing Hr-05, page#H032. 3. Driveways must be per City Standard drawing FR01 N, page#F006. 4. Maple Ave. SW-The developer to provide for the primary electrical and the communication lines fronting the property to be relocated underground. Note on construction plans. CRC3ITE2.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Envir . 9ntal Review Committee Staff Report OZBOLT CONDOMINIUMS LUA-96-159, SA,ECF REPORT OF MAY 6, 1997 Page 10 of.18 5. Maple Ave. SW-Street lighting to be provided to City of Renton standards. 6. Construction plan to show right-of-way lines on both sides of the roadway for both Maple Ave. SW and for Hardie Ave. SW. Include centerline. AIRPORT • • The site is located within the Airport's Horizontal Surface. A Notice of Proposed Construction is to be submitted to the FAA and reviewed prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. The construction of the condominiums within the Airport's Horizontal Surface area will be considered as acceptance by the developer and subsequent owners that the operation'of the airport and possible overflights of the area by aircraft of all types is;a compatible use of the land. • Notification'4of:the'proximity of aircraft/airport activity in the condominium deeds is requested by the AirportManager. POLICE • The location the applicant is planning on developing is in one of the highest crime rate areas of the City of Renton (refer to various statistics that I will provide with this). These condos will be located between the Renton Center Fred Meyer store and the Avalon Ridge, Plumtree and Sunset Terrace apartment complexes. Crimes reported along Rainier Avenue and in the Renton Center area include such incidents as robbery, burglary and auto theft. Crimes reported in the adjacent apartment complexes include auto theft, car prowling, assaults, reports of gang and drug activity, and residential burglary. It.will be necessary for the applicant to take extraordinary measures to insure the safety and security of the residents of the condominium. It should be noted that the police department provides crime rate statistics to any member of the public who wishes this information prior to signing a lease agreement or home purchase, and we have had feedback from the adjacent apartment complex managers,telling us they have had prospective tenants refuse to live at those complexes after they received this information from the police department. If it is desired to fill these condominiums;the property owner will need to point out the extra security precautions taken..to make this a safe community. To this end,the following recommendations are emphatically urged: (1) The property.needs to be completely fenced in, with electronic security-gating at both entrances,:to ensure that trespassers, drug dealers, suspected gang members and thieves absolutely do not have access to the property. The fencing that is recommended would be chain link or metal railing; definitely not any type of fence that is solid and obscures visibility onto the premises. (2) Each individual condominium unit will need solid core exterior doors, preferably metal or metal over solid wood, with peep holes, heavy duty dead bolt locks with the bolts at least 1-1/2" in length when extended, and installed with 3"wood screws. All sliding windows, to include the glass patio doors, will need additional locks; these locks will need to secure the windows from being pried out of the frames vertically. (3) Alarm systems for each unit are strongly recommended. The stairways leading to each front door need to have metal railing for hand-rails,there should be absolutely no solid walls in any stairway that would serve to limit the visibility up and down the stairs and provide a place for a criminal to hide while waiting for a home owners to return home. (4) Extra security lighting needs to be installed in the parking lots, along the sidewalks, in the stairways, and between the buildings and garages, and around the garages. Each unit should have the address number clearly listed, with the number at least 6" in height, of a color that contrasts with the color of the building and placed under a light. This will aid police or medics who respond to a call, in finding the unit they need to go to. • ERCSITE2.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Envb_ ental Review Committee Staff Report - OZBOLT CONDOMINIUMS LUA-96-159, SA,ECF REPORT OF MAY 6, 1997 Page 11 of 18 PART THREE: ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION - REPORT & DECISION A. Type of Land Use Action xx Site Plan Review Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Conditional Use Binding Site Plan Special Permit for Grade & Fill Administrative Code Determination B. Exhibits The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, environmental review and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.2: Drawing No. 1, Revised Site Plan (Received March 28, 1997). Exhibit No. 3: Drawing No. 2,.Revised Landscape Plan (Received April 10, 1997). - Exhibit No. 4: Drawing No. 3, Revised Conceptual Utility Plan (Received March 28, 1997). Exhibit No. 5: Drawing No. 4, Cultural Resource Overlay Map (Received January 22, 1997). Exhibit No. 6: Drawing No. 5, Topographic Survey (Received December 1.1, 1996). Exhibit No. 7: Drawing No. 6, Conceptual Utility Plan (Received December 11, 1996). Exhibit No. 8: Drawing No. 7, Landscape Plan (Received December 11,-1996). Exhibit No. 9: Drawing No. 8, Site Plan (Received December 11, 1996). Exhibit No. 10: Drawing No. 9, Building 1 - Foundation Plan-(Received December 11, 1996). Exhibit No. 11: Drawing No. 10, Building 1 - Basement Floor Plan (Received December 11, 1996). Exhibit No. 12: Drawing No. 11, Building 1 -.First Floor Plan (Received December 11, 1996). Exhibit No. 13: Drawing No. 12, Building 1 - Second Floor Plan (Received December 11, 1996). Exhibit No. 14: Drawing No. 13, Building 2 - Foundation Plan (Received December 11, 1996). Exhibit No. 15: Drawing No. 14, Building 2 - Basement Floor Plan (Received December 11, 1996). Exhibit No. 16: Drawing No. 15, Building 2 - First Floor Plan (Received December 11, 1996). Exhibit No. 17: Drawing No. 16, Building 2 - Second Floor Plan (Received December 11, 1996). Exhibit No. 18: Drawing No. 17, Typical Unit Plans (Received December 11, 1996). Exhibit No. 19: Drawing No. 18, Building 1 - Elevations (Received December 11, 1996). Exhibit No. 20: Drawing No. 19, Building 2 - Elevations (Received December 11, 1996). ERCSITE2.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Envii ental Review Committee Staff Report OZBOLT CONDOMINIUMS LUA-96-159,SA,ECF REPORT OF MAY 6, 1997 • Page 12 of 18 C. Consistency with Site Plan Criteria In reviewing the proposal with respect to the site Plan Approval Criteria set forth in Section 4-31- 33(D) of the Site Plan Ordinance, the following issues have been identified by City Departmental Reviewers and Divisional Reviewers: 1. GENERAL CRITERIA: A. ' CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE.PLAN, ITS ELEMENTS AND POLICIES; The .project site is• mapped within the Employment•Area-Valley"(EAV) Comprehensive Plan designation.-,The-EAV.designation was adopted by the:City:Council in'March of 1996. The EAV designation does not include or allow for residential uses and therefore the proposal is not consistent with the mapped Comprehensive Plan designation. However, the proposal is allowed by the underlying zoning designation as discussed below. Additionally, it appears that the mapping of the EAV designation on the site is erroneous. B. CONFORMANCE WITH EXISTING LAND USE REGULATIONS; The project site is. designated=Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I) on the City Zoning Map. Multiple-family dwelling units are permitted as a primary permitted use in the RM zone. Density: The allowable density range in the RM-I zone is 10 to 20'dwelling units per net'acre. The subject site is,86,710 square feet (1.99 acres), thereby allowing for.'a:maximum 39 dwelling units. The proposal for 36:,condominium units complies withthe density provision of the RM-I zone. Setbacks: The RM-I zone requires.a minimum front yard setback of 20 feet and a rear yard setback of 15 feet. The subject proposal complies with;these:setback:standards. The required side yard setback is based on the lot width. A minimum of 12 feet is required for lot widths 120 feet or greater. The applicant is proposing a 12 foot setback along the south property boundary which complies with the minimum requirement of the RM-I zone. Height: The RM-I zone allows for a maximum building height of 2 1/2 stories and 35 feet. The applicant is proposing a 35 foot maximum building height and 2 1/2 stories. It is not clear from the application submittal that the proposed buildings meet the 2 1/2 story height limit. The applicant should provide staff with further analysis to demonstrate that the proposal meets the City's building story definition in order to comply with the 2 1/2 story limit of the RM-I zone. Lot Coverage: The RM-I zone allows for a maximum building coverage of 35% and a maximum impervious surface coverage of 75%. The proposed building coverage is equal to approximately 25% of the site area (21,708 s.f. building area/ 86,710 s.f. site area). The application submittal indicates that 14,449 square feet of open space is provided. Assuming the remainder of the site is developed with impervious surfacing, the proposal would include approximately 83% impervious surfacing which exceeds the code standard. The applicant should provide further information to demonstrate whether the proposal meets the code standard for the maximum impervious surface coverage. Landscaping: The code requires landscaping of setback and open space areas and the application appears to comply with this requirement. The planting proposed on the landscape plan is very minimal and should be enhanced to 1) buffer the proposed project from adjacent properties, 2) better define common and private open space areas and 3) improve the appearance of the project and open space with additional plantings. In addition, the existing cottonwood trees along the frontage of Hardie Avenue SW should be removed and replaced with a more appropriate street tree specie. ERCSITE2.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Envir enta!Review Committee Staff Report OZBOLT CONDOMINIUMS LUA-96-159,SA,ECF REPORT OF MAY 6, 1997 Page 13 of 18 Parking: The Parking Code requires 1 1/2 parking spaces per multi-family dwelling unit, plus 1 guest parking space for every 4 units. The applicant is proposing a total of 66 parking spaces, with 32 covered spaces provided in garages in front of the units and 34 open parking spaces. The proposed parking complies with the code standard. .C. 'MITIGATION OF IMPACTS TO SURROUNDING.PROPERTIES AND USES; • The.proposal:.would.not adversely-.impact•surrounding properties-:and.uses.. 'The-proposed.multi- family,:.=development:.would ;generally- be compatible -with-existing--.,surrounding :.uses and the -anticipated- land-use' patterns in 'the area. There''areexisting':-apartmentdevelopments 'directly • south"and west of:the•subject site. =The-backof"the'Fred:Meyer::shopping•centerivadjacent to the . • • • east of the site. 'The proposalrwould not add.significanttraffic'toimpact.Iocal streets. -The proposal • would not block:views-of adjacent:properties. The'proposed,stormwatersystem:would prevent off- site storm drainage onto adjacent properties. • D. MITIGATION OF IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN TO THE SITE; • The proposal would not result in adverse impacts .to the• site. The.subject •site has been investigated for-the:presence of cultural resources:and-the environmental=analysis..section of this _report discusses in detail the measures necessary. to:mitigate.for-:potential impacts to cultural .:resources which:•may.exist on:the-site. -The:project includes':landscaped:areas.to-mitigate for the removal.of.existingwegetation°and.for:the•creation•:of.impervious•'surfaces,on the'site. E. CONSERVATION OF AREA-WIDE PROPERTY VALUES; • • .The proposal would improve a vacant lot with a multi-family:development:that:is-consistent with the existing and anticipated land use patterns in the area. The project is expected to conserve or maintain area-wide property values. F. SAFETY AND EFFICIENCY OF VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION; Access to the project is proposed via driveways off Maple Avenue SW and Hardie Avenue SW. An internal drive maintains a minimum 20 foot width and goes around the north end of Building#1 and connects to the parking area for Building #2 and continues out to Hardie Avenue SW. The end of the drive in front of Building B does not meet minimum standards for a Fire Department turnaround. The turnaround should be revised on the site plan to meet the minimum dimension requirements of the Fire Department. Fire Department access roadways require a 45 foot outside turning radius and a 25 foot inside radius. The proposed roadway does not meet the required standards at the southwest corner of Building B. The applicant should revise the proposed roadway to meet the minimum turning radius requirements of the Fire Department. The site plan does not include any provision for pedestrian circulation internal to the site, Sidewalks will be required along the property frontages on Hardie Avenue SW and Maple Avenue SW. Hardie Avenue SW is designated as a major bicycle trail in the City of Renton Trails Master Plan (September 1990). The applicant should improve the right-of-way along the site frontage of Hardie Avenue with a bicycle trail,.coordinating the construction details with the Renton Parks Department. Trail costs may be credited toward the Parks mitigation fee which has been imposed as a SEPA environmental mitigation measure. ERCSITE2.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Envii• ental Review Committee Staff Report OZBOLT CONDOMINIUMS LUA-96-159, SA,ECF REPORT OF MAY 6, 1997 Page 14 of 18 G. PROVISION OF ADEQUATE LIGHT AND AIR; The proposal includes 2 buildings. The buildings are sufficiently separated and setback from property boundaries to allow for adequate light and air circulation. H. MITIGATION OF NOISE, ODORS AND OTHER HARMFUL OR UNHEALTHY CONDITIONS; Noise and odors may be_anticipated during the construction•.phase of the project. The applicant - has proposed limiting construction activities to the hours between°7:OO.'a.m.,`and-6:00 p.m. which meets City requirements. After the initial period of construction, the proposed residential land use • is not expected to generate noise, odors, or unhealthy conditions:beyond,what.could be normally anticipated for residential uses allowed by the underlying zoning. • 1. AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED USE;AND The project site is adequately served by utilities to accommodate the proposed land use. The applicant will be required to install improvements as required by Code. See the Advisory Notes section of this report for detailed information concerning utilities and public services. J. PREVENTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD DETERIORATION AND BLIGHT. The project proposal would improve the vacant condition of the site, adding a residential use which is compatible with the neighborhood in terms of density and character. The development may aid in preventing neighborhood deterioration and blight. XX Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. D. Findings, Conclusions & Decision Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: 1) Request: The Applicant, Schneider Homes, has requested Environmental Review and Site Plan Approval for development of the Ozbolt Condominiums. 2) Environmental Review: The applicant's file containing the application, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. ERCSITE2.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Envii, _ ental Review Committee Staff Report OZBOLT CONDOMINIUMS LUA-96-159, SA,ECF REPORT OF MAY 6, 1997 Page 15 of 18 3) Site Plan Review: The applicant's site plan application complies with the requirements for information for site plan review. The applicant's site plan and other project drawings are entered as Exhibits No. 2 thru 20. 4) Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area - Valley (EAV). 5) Zoning: The Site Plan as presented, complies with:the zoning requirements and • .. development standards of the Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I) Zoning designation. 6) • Existing.Land.Use: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: Single family • residence;-East: Fred.Meyer Shopping Center ; South: ,Apartments and •West: Apartments and single family residences. E. Conclusions 1) • The subject proposal complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. 2) • The proposal does not comply with the Comprehensive Plan designation.•of Employment Area - Valley (EAV). However, it does comply with the `Zoning designation of Residential Multi- family- Infill (RM-I). • • • ERCSITE2.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Envii', ental Review Committee Staff Report OZBOLT CONDOMINIUMS LUA-96-159,SA,ECF REPORT OF MAY 6, 1997 Page 16 of 18 F. Decision • The Site Plan for Ozbolt Condominiums, File No. LUA-96-159, SA, ECF, is approved subject to the following conditions. 1. - The applicant shall provide.further building elevations and/or an:analysis to demonstrate that the proposed number of building stories meets the.City's definition of building story,:in order to comply with the 2 1/2 story height limit of the RM-I zone: This information shall be subject'to the approval of the Development Services ,Division,-prior:to the.issuance of Building Permits. • 2: The applicantshall:provide'further-:information`ta demonstrate::that'the-proposal meets the -RM-I --code standard allowing for- 75%` maximum impervious- surface coverage. This information shall be subject to the approval of the.DevelopmentServices`'Division, prior to the issuance of.Building Permits. 3. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to provide additional plantings, with an intent to 1) buffer the proposed project from adjacent properties, 2) better define common and private open space areas and 3) improve the appearance of the project and open space with additional plantings. In addition, the existing cottonwood trees along the frontage of Hardie Avenue SW shall be removed and replaced with a more-appropriate street tree: specie. The revised landscape plan shall be in compliance:with'the,Landscaping provisions: of 'Section 4-31-34. The landscape plan shall be subject -to' the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 4. 'The applicant shall revise the roadway turnaround'located at.the.end of the drive in front of Building Bin order tomeet the minimum standards for a Fire.Department turnaround. The turnaround shall be revised on the site plan and shall be'subject to the approval of the Fire Department, prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 5. The applicant shall revise the proposed roadway to meet the minimum turning radius as required by the Fire Department. Fire Department access roadways require a 45 foot outside turning radius and a 25 foot inside radius. The proposed roadway shall be revised on the site plan and shall be subject to the approval of the Fire Department, prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 6. Hardie Avenue SW is designated as a major bicycle trail in the City of Renton Trails Master Plan (September 1990). The applicant shall improve the right-of-way along the site frontage of Hardie Avenue with a bicycle trail, coordinating trail construction details with the Renton Parks Department. Trail costs may be credited toward the Parks mitigation fee which have been imposed as a SEPA environmental mitigation measure. Plans for the bicycle trail shall be approved by the Parks Department, prior to issuance of Building Permits. ERCSITE2.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Env rental Review Committee Staff Report OZBOLT CONDOMINIUMS LUA-96-159,SA,ECF REPORT OF MAY 6, 1997 Page 17 of 18 EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURES: ,tdo .014 (5-*?? James C. Han ,Zoning Administrator date �-i - Michael D Kattermann,Zoning Administrator date TRANSMITTED this I5 day of7r ; 1997 to the applicant and owner: Salvo and Lucy Ozbolt 430 Maple Avenue SW Renton, WA. 98055 Kenneth Peckham, Schneider Homes Inc. 6510 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA. 98188 TRANSMITTED this day of A 1997 to the parties of record: P Minister Luddie Thompson U 510 Stevens Avenue SW G#301 Renton, WA. 98055 TRANSMITTEDIF � , 1997 to the following: Larry Meckling,Building Official Bob Arthur,Land Use Inspector Art Larson,Fire Marshal Neil Watts,Public Works Division Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney South County Journal ERCSITE2.DOC 'City of Renton P/B/PW Department Env, rental Review Committee Staff Report OZBOLT CONDOMINIUMS LUA-96-159, SA,ECF REPORT OF MAY 6, 1997 Page 18 of 18 ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE AND ENVIRONMENTAL (COMBINED COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIOD), • Environmental Determination Comment Process Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM May 27, 1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further:action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor City of Renton Development Services Division 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 • Environmental Determination and Land Use Decision Appeal Process Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM May 27, 1997. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. ERCSITE2.DOC R . NT.iPLAN N DIUI. .::..:<.>:.;.::::.:::::::.::::::::.:;;:.:.:.::.:::::::.::_.::::::::::::.::::::................... ............... ....... .. ............ .. ..........AIL.N.G::::::.:::::::..................:.:..::............................................. . On the 8 day of IMo.a-i 1997, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing ERG dGfiev Inntv�a±lav�S documents. This information was sent to: • Name Representing Department of Ecology Dick Anderson Department of Transportation KC Water Pollution Control Metro Department of Wildlife Larry Fisher Department of Fisheries David Dietzman " Department of Natural Resources Sue Rumery City of Seattle Duwamish Indian Tribe Rod Malcom, Fisheries Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Rita Perstac Puget Power (Signature of Sender) °"5/11.)A i et... STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) -I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that !971/i), //2A /� • SeE6 T2 signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the;'u s Tandy purposes ' mentioned in the instrument. Dated: 6/f/"/ 4?-%! • ry Notary P is in and /the State of WaSiii-ato "•" • Notary (Print) ,e6-41eET \-1; Yet •' ' My appointment expires: (a Project Name: OZbott C.ohc�ovvNtv►IUt.w Project Number: LU/NGIC0- 154 • Silt %e( NOTARY.DOC CIT OF RENTON „LL 1 Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator May 07, 1997 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination and Environmental Checklist for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on May 06, 1997: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED OZBOLT CONDOMINIUMS LUA-96-159,SA,ECF Proposal to construct two separate buildings, each containing 18 condominium units,for a project total of 36 units. The buildings would be 21/2 stories with a maximum building height of 35 feet. The proposal includes 66 parking stalls with 32 provided as covered garage stalls. Access is proposed via driveways off Maple Avenue SW and Hardie Avenue SW. Location: 430 Maple Avenue SW. Environmental Determination Comment Process. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM May 27,1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or fact,error in judgment,or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments.After review of the comments,if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination,then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with:Jana Huerter,Land Use Review Supervisor,City of Renton Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055. Environmental Determination and Land Use Decision Anneal Process. Appeals of either the environmental determination[RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM May 27,1997. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)-235-2501. Appeal procedures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton,Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. If you have questions, please call me at(206) 235-2719. For the Environmental Review Committee, (ph__ Pete Roden Project Manager cc: King County Water Pollution Control Division, Metro Department of Wildlife Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Sue Rumery, City of Seattle Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Rita Perstac, Puget Power AGNCYLTR.DOC\ 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 �� Cam)Thic nanor rnntainc 50%recycled material 20%nost consumer • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-159,SA,ECF APPLICANT: Schneider Homes PROJECT NAME: Ozbolt Condominiums DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct two separate buildings, each containing 18 condominium units, for a project total of 36 units. The buildings would be 2 1/2 stories with a maximum building height of 35 feet. The proposal includes 66 parking stalls with 32 provided as covered garage stalls. Access is proposed via driveways off Maple Avenue SW and Hardie Avenue SW. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 430 Maple Avenue SW LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). .Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. PUBLICATION DATE: May 12, 1997 DATE OF DECISION: May 06, 1997 SIGNATURES: 2177mInerrri�f�' ATE/6/7;a mistratorDe arrof tannin /Building/Public Works P 9 4 ? • Sam Chastain,A ministrator DATF Community Service Department / /ZZ/,�'/� / Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief DATE Renton Fire Department Document2 • City of Renton Determination of NonSignificance-Mitigated Ozbolt Condominiums/LUA-96-159,SA,ECF Page-2- ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE AND ENVIRONMENTAL(COMBINED COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIOD) • Environmental Determination Comment Process Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM May 27, 1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. • Environmental Determination and Land Use Decision Appeal Process Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM May 27, 1997. ' If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. Document2 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES AND CONDITIONS APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-159,SA,ECF APPLICANT: Schneider Homes PROJECT NAME: Ozbolt Condominiums DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct two separate buildings, each containing 18 condominium units, for a project total of 36 units. The buildings would be 2 1/2 stories with a maximum building height of 35 feet. The proposal includes 66 parking stalls with 32 provided as covered garage stalls. Access is proposed via driveways off Maple Avenue SW and Hardie Avenue SW. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 430 Maple Avenue SW MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee of$388.00 per unit. This fee is estimated at$13,968.00. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 2. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated to be $17,467.50. This fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 3. Haul hours for construction-related truck traffic shall be restricted from 8:30 a.m.to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 4. The applicant shall pay a Park's Department mitigation fee of$354.51 per multi-family dwelling unit. The mitigation fee for the proposal is estimated at$12,762.36. This mitigation fee shall be submitted prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Archaeological Mitigations 5. Oak Tree and Vicinity: Removal of the oak tree and construction excavation in the vicinity of the oak tree shall be monitored by a professional archaeologist and a tribal monitor. If human remains are identified during construction excavation, construction would stop and the Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, The Muckleshoot Tribe, and Duwamish Tribal organization would be consulted regarding an appropriate course of action. 6. Stratum 2.1 and Feature 2: Prior to issuance of Building or Construction Permits, the applicant should provide City staff with detailed grading plans and point elevations in the area identified as Stratum 2.1 and Feature 2. If construction excavation is found to exceed depths greater than 75 centimeters,then issuance of Building and Construction permits shall be delayed until a testing program is completed to determine the potential significance of cultural deposits. 7. Areas F and G: Prior to issuance of Building or Construction Permits, the applicant should provide City staff with detailed grading plans and point elevations in the area identified as Ozbolt Condominiums Project No.LUA-96-159,SA,ECF Mitigation Measures/Conditions Page 2 Areas F and G. If construction excavation or grading is found to exceed depths greater than 25 centimeters,then issuance of Building and Construction permits should be delayed until a testing program is completed to determine the potential significance of cultural deposits. 8. East Edge of the Ozbolt Property- If excavation for the utility lines in the southeast corner of the site exceeds 25 centimeters,then the excavation should be monitored by a professional archaeologist. The Site Plan for Ozbolt Condominiums, File No. LUA-96-159, SA, ECF, is approved subject to the following conditions. CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall provide further building elevations and/or an analysis to demonstrate that the proposed number of building stories meets the City's definition of building story, in order to comply with the 2 1/2 story height limit of the RM-I zone. This information shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 2. The applicant shall provide further information to demonstrate that the proposal meets the RM-I code standard allowing for 75% maximum impervious surface coverage. This information shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 3. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to provide additional plantings, with an intent to 1) buffer the proposed project from adjacent properties, 2) better define common and private open space areas and 3) improve the appearance of the project and open space with additional plantings. In addition, the existing cottonwood trees along the frontage of Hardie Avenue SW shall be removed and replaced with a more appropriate street tree specie. The revised landscape plan shall be in compliance with the Landscaping provisions of Section 4-31- 34. The landscape plan shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 4. The applicant shall revise the roadway turnaround located at the end of the drive in front of Building B in order to meet the minimum standards for a Fire Department turnaround. The turnaround shall be revised on the site plan and shall be subject to the approval of the Fire Department, prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 5. The applicant shall revise the proposed roadway to meet the minimum turning radius as required by the Fire Department. Fire Department access roadways require a 45 foot outside turning radius and a 25 foot inside radius. The proposed roadway shall be revised on the site plan and shall be subject to the approval of the Fire Department, prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 6. Hardie Avenue SW is designated as a major bicycle trail in the City of Renton Trails Master Plan (September 1990). The applicant shall improve the right-of-way along the site frontage of Hardie Avenue with a bicycle trail, coordinating trail construction details with the Renton Parks Department. Trail costs may be credited toward the Parks mitigation fee which have been imposed as a SEPA environmental mitigation measure. Plans for the bicycle trail shall be approved by the Parks Department, prior to issuance of Building Permits. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-159,SA,ECF APPLICANT: Schneider Homes PROJECT NAME: Ozbolt Condominiums DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct two separate buildings, each containing 18 condominium units, for a project total of 36 units. The buildings would be 2 1/2 stories with a maximum building height of 35 feet. The proposal includes 66 parking stalls with 32 provided as covered garage stalls. Access is proposed via driveways off Maple Avenue SW and Hardie Avenue SW. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 430 Maple Avenue SW Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. BUILDING 1. Soils engineer required to expand on liquefaction potential. 2. A soils report and compaction tests are required for the revised building layout. FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flow for Building One is 2,750 GPM and Building Two is 2,500 GPM. Three fire hydrants are required for each building, one within 150 feet and two within 300 feet. Hydrants within the required distances may be used for more than one building. 2. Fire alarm and sprinkler systems are required for each building. Separate plans and permits are required by the Fire Department. PLAN REVIEW Sewer 1. The System Development Service Connection charge is$12,600. 2. Sewer cleanouts to be located five feet from building. 3. Sewer vertical profile will be required with construction plans. 4. Sewer main to be labeled "Private." 5. Maintain proper horizontal separation from water. The minimum separation is 10 feet or greater and vertical separation of 18 inches or greater from water. 6. Side sewer to have two percent slope. Storm Drainage 1. The System Development Services Connection charge is$7,040.18. 2. A vertical profile will be required with construction plans. 3. Show how many square feet is subject to vehicle use. Ozbolt Condominiums Project No.LUA-96-159,SA,ECF Advisory Notes(Continued) Page 2 Water 1. System Development Connection for 36 units is$18,360. 2. The proposed 8-inch water loop system will provide 2,500 gpm. the Fire Department requires a fireflow of 2,750. A 10-inch loop system will provide approximately 4,000 gpm. 3. Fire hydrant locations are not identified on the conceptual utility plan. One fire hydrant will deliver 1,000 gpm. 4. Fire hydrant locations must be approved by the Fire Department. Three hydrants are required. the primary hydrant must be located within 150 feet of the building and two within 300 feet of the building. 5. Water valve locations to be identified. 6. All utility and roadway drawings to meet the City of Renton drafting standards. 7. Show location and size of DCVA for landscaping irrigation and irrigation meter. 8. Show location and size of domestic water meter. 9. Water line loop system must be located in a 15-foot utility easement. 10. A vertical profile will be required with the construction plans. Transportation 1. Curbs, gutters and sidewalks to be provided on both Hardie Ave. SW and on Maple Ave. SW. Curb line to match extended improved street width. These improvements to extend the full width of the property frontage to the roadway. 2. Where the roadway is widened to match existing street,the asphalt overlay must extend to the center of the roadway as shown in the City Standard Drawing.Hr-05, page#H032. 3. Driveways must be per City Standard drawing FR01 N, page#F006. 4. Maple Ave. SW-The developer to provide for the primary electrical and the communication lines fronting the property to be relocated underground. Note on construction plans. 5. Maple Ave. SW-Street lighting to be provided to City of Renton standards. 6. Construction plan to show right-of-way lines on both sides of the roadway for both Maple Ave. SW and for Hardie Ave. SW. Include centerline. AIRPORT The site is located within the Airport's Horizontal Surface. A Notice of Proposed Construction is to be submitted to the FAA and reviewed prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. The construction of the condominiums within the Airport's Horizontal Surface area will be considered as acceptance by the developer and subsequent owners that the operation of the airport and possible overflights of the area by aircraft of all types is a compatible use of the land. Notification of the proximity of aircraft/airport activity in the condominium deeds is requested by the Airport Manager. POLICE The location the applicant is planning on developing is in one of the highest crime rate areas of the City of Renton (refer to various statistics that I will provide with this). These condos will be located between the Renton Center Fred Meyer store and the Avalon Ridge, Plumtree and Sunset Terrace apartment complexes. Crimes reported along Rainier Avenue and in the Renton Center area include such incidents as robbery, burglary and auto theft. Crimes reported in the adjacent apartment complexes include auto theft, car prowling, assaults, reports of gang and drug activity, and residential burglary. It will be necessary for the applicant to take extraordinary measures to insure the safety and security of the residents of the condominium. It should be noted that the police department provides crime rate statistics to any member of the public who wishes this information prior to signing a lease agreement or home purchase, and we have had feedback from the adjacent apartment complex managers, telling us they have had prospective tenants refuse to live at those complexes after they received this information Ozbolt Condominiums Project No.LUA-96-159,SA,ECF Advisory Notes(Continued) Page 3 from the police department. If it is desired to fill these condominiums, the property owner will need to point out the extra security precautions taken to make this a safe community. To this end,the following recommendations are emphatically urged: (1) The property needs to be completely fenced in,with electronic security gating at both entrances, to ensure that trespassers, drug dealers, suspected gang members and thieves absolutely do not have access to the property. The fencing that is recommended would be chain link or metal railing; definitely not any type of fence that is solid and obscures visibility onto the premises. (2) Each individual condominium unit will need solid core exterior doors, preferably metal or metal over solid wood,with peep holes, heavy duty dead bolt locks with the bolts at least 1-1/2" in length when extended, and installed with 3"wood screws. All sliding windows,to include the glass patio doors,will need additional locks;these locks will need to secure the windows from being pried out of the frames vertically. (3) Alarm systems for each unit are strongly recommended. The stairways leading to each front door need to have metal railing for hand-rails,there should be absolutely no solid walls in any stairway that would serve to limit the visibility up and down the stairs and provide a place for a criminal to hide while waiting for a home owners to return home. (4) Extra security lighting needs to be installed in the parking lots, along the sidewalks, in the stairways, and between the buildings and garages, and around the garages. Each unit should have the address number clearly listed, with the number at least 6" in height, of a color that contrasts with the color of the building and placed under a light. This will aid police or medics who respond to a call, in finding the unit they need to go to. ‘• , 1 , , , . . . . . NOTICE . . . . .. . . . . , . ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: OZBOLT CONDOMINIUMS PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-96-159,SA,ECF Proposal to construct two separate buildings,eacA containing 18 condominium units,for a project total of 1 38 units.The buildings would be 2 1/2 stories with a maximum building height of 35 feet.The proposal • - Includes 88 parking stalls with 32 provided as covered garage stalls. Access Is proposed via driveways' -=:. - off Maple Avenue SW and Hardie Avenue SW.Location:430 Maple Avenue SW. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. nYOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM ON MAY 27.1997 OR APPEAL THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM,MAY 27.1997. THE COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIODS • WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. . w%►►1reg1 r 1I. .. x_' S 2nd• Si 1 'gm rig ' r ;-:,'" --,-CP.4;:rM . m`��l��eo/nn �I' ' iI afd s� j l4lwgarr�Igti �� ` • Itr i. �� sort tau® . ,5 r mintisin.lama woliao:Al Cww -01 • . gm EIR IP . • .,...-44741102, ..§... Air . • . NE ea •-:- . ,tai iii 1 FikViii 11...,iiiii%ki I 111 MI I M 1k ' ''' . ... .-. -- . . 046.........., ‘iiiiii/1.11, il, I, 1...c.t,,,•• . MINA . . ' -: rIria 'MEI Er _ =_:11==. w ,„..z,ffi . • '---I II . II II I I Ih I if r „ • �.— • • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please Include the"project NUMBER when calling for proper file.Identlficatlon.•, • CERTIFICATION . • I, 56t/'1 ()acscrn , hereby certify that 3 copies-of the above document were poste me in 5 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on . 1' R/0) eZ , I 11 Signed: WIG/telt gaCkAilir . STATE OF WASHINGTON . ) . ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) / I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 4f9i I A V • ; . signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and votdnptily t torthe uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. = r"_ Dated: fi /7'7 ' _ r, Notary P is in an f r the S;tai 1:.V`ia4spi8gton fir! Y` ^.,' Notary (Print) ill f3-12G } .f-U. a,ti,iF-j My appointment expires: 6 9 /r . NO TA Ft Y.00C NOrTlicE\ - . ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: OZBOLT CONDOMINIUMS PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-96-159,SA,ECF Proposal to construct two separate buildings,each containing 18 condominium units,for a project total of 36 units. The buildings would be 2 1/2 stories with a maximum building height of 35 feet. The proposal includes 66 parking stalls with 32 provided as covered garage stalls. Access is proposed via driveways off Maple Avenue SW and Hardie Avenue SW. Location:430 Maple Avenue SW. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. xxx YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM ON MAY 27, 1997 OR APPEAL THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM, MAY 27, 1997. THE COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIODS WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. I leniiiiii II• ILA:, ----.- \--,-L-ILCI---.L..§:____21_______RA luitu ' $ ri Srd1 .r 4*j�1►j1 ►� Ir% :1t ya = N� Lll ■ E MID H4/I E 7 �• Via, tom, ,4,/ C N1 • F♦ L ems• A - /���/� 11�NI!• • sr- Li= i.'. illAtiVitepoilrFAIIIkil".ANT Veg kkh 9 1- IV,,.,rP7r",,i 1 gi, E Yipi i, WIlirei,•VO., ....g.g..III BE • 0,„au �.. lit.WM _= II I • ��E — _ • SW , 7th ST • �� rI�, •ESTE• '-`1 I II - I f`-il I (`7�h .r l II I .• ,"- ;•.. 0— FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION :: :::::<:::......:>::: .: e. s Iu e:> es ro.ct.: BE ' iv .e.:>c. c .0< de fi I n>>>>::?::;:<><>::::::::: , .. ...:. PL � �:�n� d th: :p:: 1 :..: NUM::...R.::;..h.:n;: alhrt!�:fo�r:.pr. � r.fl®.1:,. nt� atc .,::.;...:.:..::...:::... NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. OZBOLT CONDOMINIUMS LUA-96-159,SA,ECF Environmental review for total of 36 units. Location: Maple Ave. SW and Hardie Ave. SW. The comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal periods for this project will end at 5:00 PM on May 27, 1997. Written comments and requests for reconsideration shall be forwarded to the Development Services Division Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office, First Floor, Municipal Building. Publication Date: May 12, 1997 Account No. 51067 dnsmpub.dot r CIT'l OF RENTON .:IL Planning/Building/Public Works Department l n Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator May 7, 1997 Mr. Kenneth Peckham Schneider Homes, Inc. 6510 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 SUBJECT: Ozbolt Condominiums Project No. LUA-96-159,SA,ECF Dear Mr. Peckham: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on May 06, 1997, issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: See enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Environmental Determination Comment Process. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM May 27, 1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Environmental Determination.and Land Use Decision Appeal Process. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM May 27, 1997. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. Appeal procedures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton,Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. WAC 197-11-660 states that the responsibility for mitigation measures may be imposed upon an applicant only to the extent attributable to the identified adverse impacts of the imposed action. Since an environmental impact statement has not been prepared for this project, any mitigation measure established by the ERC not directly attributable to an identified adverse impact is deemed to be voluntarily accepted by the applicant. Staff urges you to contact the various City representatives, as appropriate, (e.g., the Public Works Division) as soon as possible, to obtain more information concerning specific mitigation elements recommended for this project, if you have specific questions. This information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and will enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (206)235-2719. (For the Environmental Review Committee, Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: Minister Luddie Thompson/Party of Record Mr. & Mrs. Salvo Ozbolt/Property Owner DNSMLTR.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES AND CONDITIONS APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-159,SA,ECF APPLICANT: Schneider Homes • PROJECT NAME: Ozbolt Condominiums DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct two separate buildings, each containing 18 condominium units, for a project total of 36 units. The buildings would be 2 1/2 stories with a maximum building height of.35 feet. The proposal includes 66 parking stalls with 32 provided as covered garage stalls. Access is proposed via driveways off Maple Avenue SW and Hardie Avenue SW. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 430 Maple Avenue SW MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee of$388.00 per unit. This fee is estimated at$13,968.00. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 2. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee,of$75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated to be $17,467.50. This fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 3. Haul hours for construction-related truck traffic shall be restricted from 8:30 a.m.to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 4. The applicant shall pay a Park's Department mitigation fee of$354.51 per multi-family dwelling unit. The mitigation fee for the proposal is estimated at$12,762.36. This mitigation fee shall be submitted prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Archaeological Mitigations 5. Oak Tree and Vicinity: Removal of the oak tree and construction excavation in the vicinity of the oak tree shall be monitored by a professional archaeologist and a tribal monitor. If human remains are identified during construction excavation, construction would stop and the Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation,The Muckleshoot Tribe, and Duwamish Tribal organization would be consulted regarding an appropriate course of action. 6. . Stratum 2.1 and Feature 2: Prior to issuance of Building or Construction Permits,the applicant should provide City staff with detailed grading plans and point elevations in the area identified as Stratum 2.1 and Feature 2. If construction excavation is found to exceed depths greater than 75 centimeters,then issuance of Building and Construction permits shall be delayed until a testing program is completed to determine the potential significance of cultural deposits. 7. Areas F and G: Prior to issuance of Building or Construction Permits,the applicant should provide City staff with detailed grading plans and point elevations in the area identified as •. Ozbolt Condominiums Project No.LUA-96-159,SA,ECF Mitigation Measures/Conditions Page 2 Areas F and G. If construction excavation or grading is found to exceed depths greater than 25 centimeters,then issuance of Building and Construction permits should be delayed until a testing program is completed to determine the potential significance of cultural deposits. 8. East Edge of the Ozbolt Property- If excavation for the utility lines in the southeast corner of the site exceeds 25 centimeters, then the excavation should be monitored by a professional archaeologist. The Site Plan for Ozbolt Condominiums, File No. LUA-96-159,SA, ECF, is approved subject to the following conditions. CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall provide further building elevations and/or an analysis to demonstrate that the proposed number of building stories meets the City's definition of building story, in order to comply with the 2 1/2 story height limit of the RM-I zone. This information shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 2. The applicant shall provide further information to demonstrate that the proposal meets the RM-I code standard allowing for 75% maximum impervious surface coverage. This information shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 3. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to provide additional plantings, with an intent to 1) buffer the proposed project from adjacent properties, 2) better define common and private open space areas and 3) improve the appearance of the project and open space with additional plantings. In addition, the existing cottonwood trees along the frontage of Hardie Avenue SW shall be removed and replaced with a more appropriate street tree specie. The revised landscape plan shall be in compliance with the Landscaping provisions of Section 4-31- 34. The landscape plan shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 4. The applicant shall revise the roadway turnaround located at the end of the drive in front of Building B in order to meet the minimum standards for a Fire Department turnaround. The turnaround shall be revised on the site plan and shall be subject to the approval of the Fire Department, prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 5. The applicant shall revise the proposed roadway to meet the minimum turning radius as required by the Fire Department. Fire Department access roadways require a 45 foot outside turning radius and a 25 foot inside radius. The proposed roadway shall be revised on the site plan and shall be subject to the approval of the Fire Department, prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 6. Hardie Avenue SW is designated as a major bicycle trail in the City of Renton Trails Master Plan (September 1990). The applicant shall improve the right-of-way along the site frontage of Hardie Avenue with a bicycle trail, coordinating trail construction details with the Renton Parks Department. Trail costs may be credited toward the Parks mitigation fee which have been imposed as a SEPA environmental mitigation measure. Plans for the bicycle trail shall be approved by the Parks Department, prior to issuance of Building Permits. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-159,SA,ECF APPLICANT: Schneider Homes PROJECT NAME: Ozbolt Condominiums DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct two separate buildings, each containing 18 condominium units, for a project total of 36 units. The buildings would be 2 1/2 stories with a maximum building height of 35 feet. The proposal includes 66 parking stalls with 32 provided as covered garage stalls. Access is proposed via driveways off Maple Avenue SW and Hardie Avenue SW. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 430 Maple Avenue SW Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. BUILDING 1. Soils engineer required to expand on liquefaction potential. 2. A soils report and compaction tests are required for the revised building layout. FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flow for Building One is 2,750 GPM and Building Two is 2,500 GPM. Three fire hydrants are required for each building, one within 150 feet and two within 300 feet. Hydrants within the required distances may be used for more than one building. 2. Fire alarm and sprinkler systems are required for each building. Separate plans and permits are required by the Fire Department. PLAN REVIEW Sewer 1. The System Development Service Connection charge is$12,600. 2. Sewer cleanouts to be located five feet from building. 3. Sewer vertical profile will be required with construction plans. 4. Sewer main to be labeled "Private." 5. Maintain proper horizontal separation from water. The minimum separation is 10 feet or greater and vertical separation of 18 inches or greater from water. 6. Side sewer to have two percent slope. Storm Drainage 1. The System Development Services Connection charge is$7,040.18. 2. A vertical profile will be required with construction plans. 3. Show how many square feet is subject to vehicle use. Ozbolt Condominiums Project No.LUA-96-159,SA,ECF Advisory Notes(Continued), Page 2 Water 1. System Development Connection for 36 units is$18,360. 2. The proposed 8-inch water loop system will provide 2,500 gpm. the Fire Department requires a fireflow of 2,750. A 10-inch loop system will provide approximately 4,000 gpm. 3. Fire hydrant locations are not identified on the conceptual utility plan. One fire hydrant will deliver 1,000 gpm. 4. Fire hydrant locations must be approved by the Fire Department. Three hydrants are required. the primary hydrant must be located within 150 feet of the building and two within 300 feet of the building. 5. Water valve locations to be identified. 6. All utility and roadway drawings to meet the City of Renton drafting standards. 7. Show location and size of DCVA for landscaping irrigation and irrigation meter. 8. Show location and size of domestic water meter. 9. Water line loop system must be located in a 15-foot utility easement. 10. A vertical profile will be required with the construction plans. Transportation 1. Curbs, gutters and sidewalks to be provided on both Hardie Ave. SW and on Maple Ave. SW. Curb line to match extended improved street width. These improvements to extend the full width of the property frontage to the roadway. 2. Where the roadway is widened to match existing street, the asphalt overlay must extend to the center of the roadway as shown in the City Standard Drawing Hr-05, page#H032. 3. Driveways must be per City Standard drawing FR01 N, page#F006. 4. Maple Ave. SW-The developer to provide for the primary electrical and the communication lines fronting the property to be relocated underground. Note on construction plans. 5. Maple Ave. SW-Street lighting to be provided to City of Renton standards. 6. Construction plan to show right-of-way lines on both sides of the roadway for both Maple Ave. SW and for Hardie Ave. SW. Include centerline. AIRPORT The site is located within the Airport's Horizontal Surface. A Notice of Proposed Construction is to be submitted to the FAA and reviewed prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. The construction of the condominiums within the Airport's Horizontal Surface area will be considered as acceptance by the developer and subsequent owners that the operation of the airport and possible overflights of the area by aircraft of all types is a compatible use of the land. Notification of the proximity of aircraft/airport activity in the condominium deeds is requested by the Airport Manager. • POLICE The location the applicant is planning on developing is in one of the highest crime rate areas of the City of Renton (refer to various statistics that I will provide with this). These condos will be located between the Renton Center Fred Meyer store and the Avalon Ridge, Plumtree and Sunset Terrace apartment complexes. Crimes reported along Rainier Avenue and in the Renton Center area include such incidents as robbery, burglary and auto theft. Crimes reported in the adjacent apartment complexes include auto theft, car prowling, assaults, reports of gang and drug activity, and residential burglary. It will be necessary for the applicant to take extraordinary measures to insure the safety and security of the residents of the condominium. It should be noted that the police department provides crime rate statistics to any member of the public who wishes this information prior to signing'a lease agreement or home purchase, and we have had feedback from the adjacent apartment complex managers, telling us they have had prospective tenants refuse to live at those complexes after they received this information Ozbolt Condominiums Project No.LUA-96-159,SA,ECF Advisory Notes(Continued) Page 3 from the police department. If it is desired to fill these condominiums,the property owner will need to point out the extra security precautions taken to make this a safe community. To this end,the following recommendations are emphatically urged: (1) The property needs to be completely fenced in,with electronic security gating at both entrances, to ensure that trespassers, drug dealers, suspected gang members and thieves absolutely do not have access to the property. The fencing that is recommended would be chain link or metal railing; definitely not any type of fence that is solid and obscures visibility onto the premises. (2) Each individual condominium unit will need solid core exterior doors, preferably metal or metal over solid wood,with peep holes, heavy duty dead bolt locks with the bolts at least 1-1/2" in length when extended, and installed with 3"wood screws. All sliding windows,to include the glass patio doors, will need additional locks;these locks will need to secure the windows from being pried out of the frames vertically. (3) Alarm systems for each unit are strongly recommended. The stairways leading to each front door need to have metal railing for hand-rails,there should be absolutely no solid walls in any stairway that would serve to limit the visibility up and down the stairs and provide a place for a criminal to hide while waiting for a home owners to return home. . (4) Extra security lighting needs to be installed in the parking lots, along the sidewalks, in the stairways, . and between the buildings and garages, and around the garages. Each unit should have the address number clearly listed,with the number at least 6" in height, of a color that contrasts with the color of the building and placed under a light. This will aid police or medics who respond to a call, in finding the unit they need to go to. • L•REV .. »:: To: • Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Sa Chastain, Community Services Administrator Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief • From: Jim Hanson & Mike Kattermann :�:: .eet�n •�#]ate::::>:::;:::»:<:::>::>Tu�sda <Ma : ..........�....................................................................:...:.:::::::::::::::::::.:::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.::: 0: ,.;;>.,. . ::;:.;:>:>::»:;::;:»:>::>::»:::Thir::.d:Floar::> •onfet�ence>:t��o............................... . .............................................. Agenda'Iisted below. • Candlewood Condominiums (new) (Rosen/2719) LUA-97-052,SA,ECF Proposal for a 134 unit extended-stay hotel. The proposed building is 4 stories (49 feet 6 inches in height) and 71,916 square feet. 165 parking stalls are provided. Access is proposed via a common drive off East Valley Road. Location: 1701 East Valley Road. Ozbolt Condominiums (new) (Rosen/2719) LUA-96-159,SA,ECF Proposal to construct two separate buildings, each containing 18 condominium units, for a project total of 36 units. The buildings would be 2 1/2 stories with a maximum building height of 35 feet. The proposal includes 66 parking stalls with 32 provided as covered garage stalls. Access is proposed via driveways off Maple Avenue SW and Hardie Avenue SW. Location: 430 Maple Avenue SW. • cc: ' J.Covington,Executive Assistant to the Mayor AGENDA.DOC L.Warren,City Attorney (R) F.Kaufman,Heanng Examiner S.Carlson,Economic Development Director (R) • J.Gray,Fire Prevention A.Larson,Fire (R) P.Pierce,P/B/PW Admin. _ate. �= E 0 8 1997 CITY OF RENTON �t�ELorrvicirrp PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS °1n'OFR oNNING MEMORANDUM DATE: April 7, 1997 TO: Peter Rosen FROM: Clinton Morgan SUBJECT: Ozbolt Condos/Building B orientation Change No problem noted with building B orientation change. The previous comments will still need to be address regarding water, sewer, storm and transportation issues. 97cm054 H:\W W6ODOT\MEMO.DOT\bh TY 1 O CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: April 2, 1997 TO: Peter Rosen, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal SUBJECT: Ozbolt Condominiums, 430 Maple Avenue SW Fire Department Comments: 1.The preliminary required fire flow for Building One is 2750 GPM and Building Two is 2500 GPM. Three fire hydrants are required for each building, one within 150 feet and two within 300 feet. Hydrants within the required distances may be used for more than one building. 2. Fire alarm and sprinkler systems are required for each building. Separate plans and permits are required by the Fire Department. 3. Fire Department access roadways are required a 45 foot outside . turning radius and a 25 foot inside radius. The roadway needs to be modified at the southwest corner of Building Two. 4. The fire mitigation fee is required at $388.00 per unit, total is 36 X $388.00 = $13968.00 5. An approved Fire Department turnaround is required at the end of the drive in front of building B. The turnaround as shown does not meet the minimum dimension requirements, see the attached diagram. Grass crete is not acceptable as a driving surface. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. • FIRE ..,._'PARATUS ACCESS L-.JADS RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 235-2642 • —90 FEET m c� TURNING • RADIUS03 << > r< v a_ 25—FEET INSIDE Slignsimmi 45—FEET OUTSIDE .�c K �l 20—FEET K 55—FEET w Lij d•:ii{ .. •ivw::::.v: :.v:•++ v......x n..v.. v...... nxixx44:{vv{i? .{try:0}}rv^:?•:;•}}:?+i}:i4ri?•i}:ii:: �'v+}xv}t!Y•:nw....:.}v} ?.}:{;J:-}}n:::• ..:{KL\{{{{{..L::y.v:}}\'•:;C.v.}•.. xm:.. v.0..:n:•.vv:C}}}:;;.;;-,.vv.x:•.vPtiti•:it .... :v;n•.v:x:xnn:x: :..i v,�vw:.vvx•.vv:vx,•:r•:•.:vv::.vx::v:::.v:nvvxv. •}n{.v t..., ........ v:•:n;v;........-x-.vwv::::::n .v:•.v.v:. :::::::n•:}:: ..y.:::......................w.:n::vvv:•.::::. •vit ...... ..Yr:.r:. !:4...:. .:�•.v. n•:r::w.w::.w::•. :.,{tYi+:-}:;::.Y:.,..::iiri::::....{'}:;;:;:;:;:;: :r:•y,;:.�.}:::+{.•::?;: ..wv�::}?•:::+•:;ry}•::..;.t. ....t.t,....:.:.::..,......,...::.,.;:•}:-::::r{}:;;:`•:;%:i'::�i::<4;>;i;SYi:: ... .... .:. :.{•.:,::::.::.,::: 4:.........:::t..,:r:..,:.::..:r......t.... •??v'v0:y:vi?..jr}•}:•i}'•:}i::?::L:i%•}:ry}::::Wn}•.}v.;:.}:vvti:L.tiv:{.}:tivvw::::.vv::::... :: :.:.vx . .^.:;+;n:xw:nw.vv:.:v.•.:•:�vv:::•••••^?•:i+ti-:iiv+iS<•: vv{�}vn:?vv:..:•.yy..{v:•::nv:::n• x:>.w•:::::n{:{¢v:{:ry::•.vv!•.v., ntt�.�w.,,•:.x:v:...v.vv:•.v:v:•••:}}}}Y}:8v}iiY::•i1:i}}}}v}iiy}}:•}}}:•}:?}}YY:+.•}}::•:}:•:�:�:?{ - �Y'•vv}}?iii'iii•i}4i$iiii!'::•:,}r'}ry}t};:.}v;4vi}}}••,w:•... • :.. v...... v......................n................. n... v...xt n.n'xw.vi:•Y}..�v•{{t\},:... .. ............... xt?{•:L;ry;{.}Y}}:•}}}i?:i::v.v+�.:::n•.:vn:v:.vvvxv:. ::::....v{: •.,+t ::... .fx.vv.x....+.v...:....,..n:v:. ....... ..................................w:n:•.+t•Y:::titi•;..tx...'.j�j+...::rii?t,}yx:v{•}r:}:{•}::.}}:v:i�•}}' ?:::{•};:� vj!v:i}}}}i:{ij-%?.i}}: •vxv:vvxvv x::::::v::::x:. nv.nv.......tv....... v.v......v..... x:::•.vn .v:},.{ktvn�:yx...:viLnv}•nv}.rpyv. .:}tv..,+I..ry n:..yv,.:.:.}•.;n}yv:{..rn,•xw:x:.;::ry;. «vtv::nv::n•.w::::::::?•}:•:-i•:?L•i;,v.:w.v:•<}w:::•w:.v::•nvv..::st.: .v}}y:x:rnv.vn.v:...:i •• v.v.;}}:.:ry:}::o n•..:nv.::xn::.v:+x�n:}}:: :.n{:•}Y:Y::•:::.}`Y}'.Y•.w:::.:;;•ny;.v:w.v: n..+;v: •i:�v: ti >.{}r` `;i is 55 ...::::::::::::ti•:ti!!•%hn:v.:n..v?4 v.}:{{i?i?>.;G:r:: v... ...nnvt .. '-.w:•.x:w:.v::nv, n,•. v M1„ n.:n.•, ix.:.:.v:::.�J'� }...... ..>.>.:•:nw::::.vvntt>.viv vv+ :}?>.:•{>:}•vri}::>.i.�,}}}}....:\.........::......:$:}:iii{`•;:' �/.� .. tt n..... ::.:. v :.x:::::::.yyv,.w:nxx•::n::.:::::: •: v}};ry}}}}}:tin.. •n:•:nv:;v .}}........v.•.vw:n:v:::.vvv:::.v:n:v::vv::::.v::-v::.:..w::::n:•:n::vv:::::, {..;• .v..........m:v•::x:::::::n.v:.tw.v :::nw:.v:nw:::vv.::v:w:::}}}:::n::•:::::::::::n:w::u:n:vvvw:.v -:{{?i0:4}}>:;}iii•:}:`}: ...........:.:.......}::Y:.;.},:-::^:o}:•}}i}is�>:-iso:•}}is�::::.:t::.,•::}:?tvt•}:::{:{..i:.:.::.'' :: .�:..t....n..tt..ty::::;:...;%:•}::..:T:t.:............:. ::................:.,:............:...:::..::{::•n.:..... ............................:�,,�:::...........................;:::::i'. .t,?: TURNING RADIUS • a.. 25—FEET INSIDE • %<„Y%%:s: <;{<<«; 45-FEET OUTSIDE1111111)1111111 ..................... K �I 20—FEET CURB • ' >•tt:? ::C:iiiv:4?:Gi:iiiii:>i. • {.} :$$>j >.ii>:>.{vryvvviif}�!yl is{%^% ?4.?}:L>i' :^%:i v{:::• n••�i:i .,}�µ.::.•'''"{iii's'::`::v�i .:vvtt n 'tii:!...... .:... ..:.n..r•:vv:yJvvn• :ti:iTiii�ii':ii i�i:: �y/��� •:.v{•:{•:?ttivi{•}•:i?4i:•}:•}:•}:{.`,1iii�ii:::�v:: ;''AF.'••:•--�n�i•?'-:;:{::i•:;:;'''i::i?ii::::v::iii:j;:{;i:;}Y:;}}:;}}ii vvv�:::ti::::;iti'::i::'tin?k::i��!w�. ^� iii;S i•jnS:ii:•4•i:i:i:hii::':L2: • 2iti}.v..{i?:i:+:6:}i}.i'iiifiY':.'L':.::i.:`:?`.Y.'�;{'{::r�{`•%:'S:•`.'<:`::'a{��:::..... .2..........:...........{... I.L �• rac��wr .. :.w.txvw:::n•::.::::v.:•vv.:xvvvw:::,v.•.vvv:ryv. YY i i}Y}}}{tiY>. '^^ +iW. �J ::::.YtiYr'r':::ii:^Y+:F?4y%~%':} tir:%?}:::::'.i}t%i:%::%:J%:ti}i:::::S:::{:,:•••i •vvnxvv.v:nvnw.v.::ii:'Li}}:::•}v:t}�;:. }:ry;.}:•} :•.v.:{•.::::?Y..vx::i:•:.vv:ry"?-+'ryiv'.Li::y::;.:Ci:`v.}}:.,}i}:b}ri::: i% :Rr:;:ii::: i;>:,t .:::::::x.x::•:x.:vw::::.•.w::;;: is ?;iii:{i,t,;.n•;;....... I ::•••-}:•::.,-:..•.,.:.v-:•i:iii?::i:!::';•.ii::::'}ri«i :ri::{v}:{-::;ii'C}(.:;!mpg! �:i-..•: � ...... ........... ...... .. ......:. :.:-ttt•ri2`t:'-.`,rr::.ttt•,{.::.t.. ,::.tr:•.i2%%YiY:•r::.}c S•:;::::5}: Y}Y>�{.}Yi}}YY:•}t:•t}}}K :{-gt:.��1.•��C:•:•itEo 'f5}%%;JYt:i;::ti U #�U m RENTON FIRE DEPT AU CITY OF RENTON I\PR021997 Planning / Building / Public Works MEMORANDUM "`' v' tD DATE: April 2, 1997 TO: Building, Fire Prevention, Plan Review r7-- FROM: Peter Rosen 'Associate Planner SUBJECT: Ozbolt Condos-- LUA96-159, SA, ECF The proposed site plan has been revised by the applicant. The revision is limited to a change in the orientation/layout of Building B on the site. The number of units remains the same. Attached are your previous review comments and the revised site plan. Please review and revise your comments as necessary. I would appreciate receiving your comments by April 11. Thank you. cc: Jana Huerter • Ptte/1 . . City __9nrop Department f-P an wilding/Pu he WarKs . ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPME T APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET. REVIEWING DEPRTMNT: ,, . ,._ a„ , , . ,... CA:WA/us:AVy, e.Yu IC.i.tS;COMMENTS•DUE:- JANUARY 10, 1k97. , •APPLICATION`NO: LUA-96-159,SA,ECF ' - - '' DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 19, 1996r)% . APPLICANT: SCHNEIDER HOMES PROJECT MANAGER: PETER ROSEN n ,�, PROJECT TITLE: OZBOLT CONDOMINIUMS WORK ORDER NO: 78169 �6' ®l ,,,, LOCATION: .430 MAPLE AVENUE �.(�`.,,. �J�fQ . SITE AREA 1.99 ACRES I BUILDING AREA(gross): 50,124 Sq.Ft. NOvi` - C SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The applicant proposes to construct two separate buildings, each containing 18 condominium units (36 units total). The maximum building height would be 35 feet. The proposal includes 66 parking stalls with 32 provided as covered garage stalls. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS • Element of the Probable Probable Mors Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts • impacts Necessary Earth it Housing • Air Aesthetics • • Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use . Utilities . Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services • Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment • 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 5.) [Ls 60&(b661t. l 6xphik 1) • c() Lr&c W xif PtitTt ttb • • . . SOILS ENGINEER TO EXPAND ON LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL. sau-S' le402 I COv"ffC-T/OA( re T3 WEQ 1/ge.0 Fat olPefjSee Qv/4di>i/�. iire . • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed •pication ••h particclarattention to those areas in which we have expertise,and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addition iii lift 2 e to prop}rly assess this proposal. VI 111111' :,' Signature of Director or Authorised Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10193 • City i:.. _Mon Department of Planning/Building/Pi_ Norks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: \t=i6ktce, COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 10, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-159,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 19, 1996 APPLICANT: SCHNEIDER HOMES PROJECT MANAGER: PETER ROSEN PROJECT TITLE: OZBOLT CONDOMINIUMS WORK ORDER NO: 78169 LOCATION: 430 MAPLE AVENUE SITE AREA 1.99 ACRES I BUILDING AREA(gross): 50,124 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The applicant proposes to construct two separate buildings, each containing 18 condominium units (36 units total). The maximum building height would be 35 feet. The proposal includes 66 parking stalls with 32 provided as covered garage stalls. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary impacts • Impacts Necessary Earth - Housing Air Aesthetics Water _ LighvGlare Plants Recreation AnimalsLand/Shorel/ne Use T ansp Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet . si polio (vats S Mc4 S�i,m 0 m . The location the applicant is planning on developing, is in one of the highest crime rate areas of the City of Renton (refer to various statistics that I will provide with this) . These condos will be located between the Renton Center Fred Meyer store, and the Avalon Ridge, Plumtree and Sunset Terrace apartment complexes. Crimes reported along Rainier AVenue and in the Renton Center area, include such incidents as Robbery, Burglary and Auto Theft. Crimes reported in the adjacent apartment complexes include. Auto Theft, Car Prowling, Assaults, reports of gang and drug activity, and residential burglary. It will be necessary for the applicant to take extraordinary measures to insure the safety and security of the residents of the condominium. It should be noted that the police..department provides crime rate statistics to any member of the public who wishes this information prior to signing a lease agreement or home purchase, and we have had feedback from the adjacent apartment complex,managers, telling us they have had prospective tenants refuse to live at those complexes after they received this information from the police department. If it is desired to fill up these condominiums, the property owner will need to point out the extra security precautions taken to make this a safe. community. To this end, the following recommendations are emphatically urged: the property needs to be CLIODODIERREIDIFEEDCMAIMENTE completely fenced in, with electronic security gating at both entrances, to ensure that trespasserE drug dealers, suspected gang members and thieves absolutely do not have access to the property. The f'encing ,that is recommended would be chain link or metal railing - definately not any type of fence that is solid and obscures visibility onto the premises. (Continued on back side of page. . . We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 1,Q.!i . / —CO Sig re of Director or utho ed Represents ive . Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10193 r Each individual condomii, , unit will need solid core ext.,,..--or doors, preferably- me-tal or metal over solid-wood, with peep holes, heavy-duty dead bolt locks with the bolts at least 1 1/2" in length when extended, and installed with 3" wood screws. All sliding windows, to include the glass patio doors, will need additional locks; these locks will need to secure the windows from being pried out of the frames vertically. This means the locks will need to be placed into the top or bottom of the frams, in addition to any lock that limits horizontal movement. Alarms-.systemsrlorc each'unit arelistrongly'recommended. The stairways leading to each front door need to have metal railing for hand-rails, there should be absolutely no solid walls in any stairway that would serve to limit the visibility up and down the stairs and provide a place for a criminal to hide while waiting for a home owner to return home. In addition, the balcony walls also need to be made of either metal or wood lattice, or railing - no solid walls, for the same purpose. Extra security lighting needs to be installed in the parking;;lots, along the sidewalks, in the stairways, and between the buildings and garages, and around the garages. Each unit should have the address number clearly listed, with the number at least 6" in height, of a color that contrasts with the color of the building, and placed under a light. This will aid police or medics who respond to a call, in finding the unit they need to go to. Landscaping around the exterior of the property should not be too dense or high; It is important to allow visibility. Too much and too dense landscaping will give the property the look Of a fortress, and make the residents feel isolated. • BUSIEST REPORTING DISTRICTS CITY OF RENTON, 1995: #POLICE CITY GRID # LOCATION: CALLS: 3212 Benson/Puget, Abitare/Eagle Point 1,532 4124 Avalon Ridgei f(LLrn i ee_ gGIK/ 1,424 SUISCt (ZrraCe_ 7th-Sunset, Edmonds-Monroe NE 1,084 North Renton 1,004 Downtown Renton, east 746 NE 16th- city limits, Edmonds-Monroe 720 4th-12th NE, Union-Duvall NE 511 Sunset Lane, housing authority 406 Downtown Renton, west 86 Monroe-Union NE,NE 12th-NE 7th 76 BUSIEST REPORTING DISTRICTS CITY OF RENTON, 1994 # POLICE CITY GRID # LOCATION: CALLS: 4124 Avalon Ridge/Plumtree Park 1,230 and Sunset Terrace 3212 Abitare/Eagle Point 1,014 2221 Renton Highlands 916 2111 Park Ave-Houser Wy N/ 877 Bronson Wy N.- N. 4th St. 4114 Downtown Renton 620 2241 NE 10th-Anacortes NE/ 543 Union-City Limits/NE 4th-12th 2321 NE 10th/Olympia Ave NE 315 PLEASE NOTE: Statistics for the month of August, 1994, are not included in this report due to a malfunction in the dispatch computer. Renton Police Department . � 0' CITIZEN REQUEST FOR NEIGHBORHOOD CRIME STATISTICS ' i!LIC6 ` t Name: • Date of Request: Phone No(s): Peter Rosen/Schneider Homes 01-22-97 Address: City State Zip - Fax No: 206 Location: ' Grid(s) Avalon Ridge Apartments, 510 Stevens Avenue SW, Renton (255-5100) 4124 Time Span Reviewed: October 1, 1996 through December 31, 1996 THEFT 26 Includes theft from motor vehicle ASSAULT 13 Includes domestic violence incidences MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 13 AUTO THEFT 6 Includes attempts BURGLARY Residential , 5 . Commercial 1 CHILD NEGLECT/ABUSE 1 NUISANCE/OBSCENE PHONE CALLS 2 • BREACH OF PEACE NARCOTICS 1 HOMICIDE ROBBERY 1 • TRESPASS • FRAUD RAPE TOTAL REPORTS 69 Other Comments: NOTE: These numbers are for police reports ONLY. There are 3.8 calls to 911 for every police report filed,therefore,there were approximately 262 police calls for assistance at Avalon Ridge during the 4th quarter of 1996. Prepared By: Date: 2 udrey 'Moore/Crime prevention 235-2571 4;;;IAnuary 22, 1997 RAINIER AVENUE Renton Police Department Alan L. Wallis,Chief CRIME BusinessWatch N. UNIT 235-2571 October, 1996 Dear Rainier Avenue Merchants, Last month there were two reported Robberies in the 300-400 block of Rainier Ave S./Renton Center area. In the first of these robberies, a man was sitting in his parked car in a parking lot, when he was approached by a suspect who displayed a gun to him and demanded his wallet. Once the suspect had the money from the wallet, he fled the area on foot. The victim was not harmed. In the second robbery, a-woman was fusing the ca is rna�:=n ie at a'bank.at`:inidnight ` _ „,, :.,,;, when she was approached by a man who displayed a gun to her and stole her cash. ; Suspect then got into a waiting vehicle and fled the area. Victim was not harmed. In order to prevent these types of robberies from occurring, people need to pay attention to their surroundings at all times, and react to any perceived threat before reaching the point of no return. In the first robbery, the victim saw the suspect approaching his vehicle on foot. The victim could have rolled up his window, turned on his engine and moved his car somewhere else. The suspect should never have been able to get so close to the victim. By being in a vehicle, the victim actually had an advantage of mobility over the suspect; he just didn't realize it. The second robbery occurred at midnight at an ATM machine at a bank. The bank was of course closed. As the victim pulled her car into the parking lot, she saw a vehicle with three occupants parked in the bank parking lot. It never occurred to the victim to ask herself why anyone would be hanging around a bank parking lot at midnight, in a position where they could observe the ATM machine. It turned out that the only reason they were there was to rob the next person who used the cash machine. This robbery need not have occurred. If the victim had asked herself why these people were loitering in the parking lot, she might have realized that her safety was at risk, and she could have chosen to go elsewhere to obtain the cash she required. There are many places where a person can use an ATM machine in better safety, such as 24-hour grocery stores where there are always employees and other customers around. For information on Robbery Prevention and Personal Safety training, please call the Crime Prevention Unit at 235-2571. All classes are always free of charge. Sincerely, Business Watch Coordinator Renton Police Department 235-2571 Citizens and Police:Partners for a Safe Community. RAINIER AVENUE BUSINESS-RELATED CRIMES RECAP FOR THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER,1996 ASSAULT: 300 Rainier Ave S.block 2 adults arrested after stealing lemonade from a business and then assaulting stole employees when they tried to detain the thieves. 400 Rainier Ave N.block 2 groups of young men fired gun shots in a business parking lot. 1 man received a gun shot wound to the arm and was taken to the hospital. Case is under investigation. AUTO THEFT: 200 Rainier Ave S.block '79 Ford truck stolen/found 10 days later by Seattle Police. $3000.00 300 Rainier Ave N.block White '83 Chevy truck,license#HZ3797,stolen from repair shop. $2500.00 300 Renton Center Way block '83 Toyota Corolla stolen in Kent,found in Renton parking lot. 400 Rainier Ave N.block '95 Ford truck stolen in Kent/found in Renton parking lot. BOMB THREAT: 300 Renton Center.Way block. Business received a phony bomb threat. COMMERCIAL BURGLARY: 300 Renton Center Way block Door lock pried/cash stolen. $ 480.00 400 Rainier Ave S.block Door to business pried/alarm activated/jewelry stolen. $7900.00 400 Rainier Ave N.block 2 burglaries: both times garage door was pried and suspects then smashed through dry-wall to enter business. Nothing stolen. 700 Rainier Ave S.block Door pried to construction trailer/ladder&paint sprayer stolen. $2080.00 FRAUD/FORGERY: 500 Rainier Ave S.block 1 adult arrested for trying to pass a stolen and forged check at a business. MALICIOUS MISCHIEF: 70 Rainier Ave S.block Rock thrown through business glass door. $ 100.00 ROBBERY; 300 Renton Center Way block 8:00 PM: victim sitting in his car in parking lot. Suspect approached,$ 230.00 displayed a gun and stole the victim's wallet. No injuries. 400 Rainier Ave S.block Midnight: victim at cash machine withdrawing money. Suspect $ 50.00 approached, displayed a gun and stole her cask No injuries. THEFTS: 1.00 Rainier Ave S.block Car Prowl/window smashed/misc. items stolen. $1220.00 100 Rainier Ave S.block Car Prowl/2 magnetic signs stolen off a parked vehicle. $ 100.00 200 Rainier Ave S.block 3 suspects ate at restaurant and left without paying for their food. $ 22.00 200 Rainier Ave N.block - Car Prowl/window smashed/car parts stolen. $1135.00 300 Rainier Ave S.block Car Prowl/window smashed/cellular phone and CD's stolen. $ 550.00 300 Rainier Ave S.block Car Prowl/windshield smashed and grill stolen off parked car. $550.00 300 Renton Center Way block Car Prowl/battery and cables stolen from parked car. $ 60.00 300 Renton Center Way block Bicycle stolen from outside of store. $200.00 400 Rainier Ave S.block Car Prowl/unknown entry to vehicle/purse stolen. $ 180.00 700 Rainier Ave S.block Stereo stolen from a car left at a business for repairs. $300.00 SHOPLIFTS: #ADULT ARRESTS #JUVENILE ARRESTS $LOSS: 300 Renton Center Way block 1 5 $ 198.00 400 Rainier Ave S.block 1 3 $ 122.00 500 Rainier Ave S.block 1 0 $ 60.00 DRUG/ALCOHOL ARRESTS: There was one DUI and two drug related arrests along Rainier Avenue,during the month of September, 1996 _ . • , Renton RAINIER AVENUE Police r # i, , Chief CRIME Business Watch UNIT r 235-2571 I November, 1996 Dear Rainier Avenue Merchants, The Renton Police Department will be hosting another Citizen's Academy, beginning in January. This is a 12-week course that meets once a week for a two hour session. The Citizen's Academy strives to educate the public in how`your police' department conducts business and works for the community. Classes are offered on the following subjects: Patrol Operations, narcotics dog unit, Bike Patrol, Emergency Services Unit, Police Investigations, Gangs, Drug Investigations, Animal Control, Use of Force, Shoot/Don't Shoot, Traffic Division, and Response to Traumatic Incidents. Those who attend the Academy are also able to participate in an optional ride-along with a patrol. officer, and receive a tour of the 9-1-1 dispatch center, police department and jail. If you are interested in attending the next Citizen's Academy, please give.me a call and I will mail you the short application form. Car Prowling was the most common reported crime in business areas last month. In the Rainier Avenue area, there were five cases reported. What is of particular interest in these five cases is that in the majority of them, the vehicles had been left unlocked by the owners. An open or unlocked vehicle is like an open invitation for a thief. Try to remember to roll up your windows and lock your doors when parking your vehicle, and to park it in a place that is well-lighted and easy to see from your place of work. Car Prowlers usually"shop" from car to car, choosing which one to break into. If you get into the habit of keeping your car cleaned out, and don't leave purses, wallets, cellular phones and other items in plain view, a Car Prowler may choose to pass your car by. Sincerely,. ry AUK , IRi Business Watch Coordinator • Renton Police Department 235-2571 Citizens and Police:Partners for a Safe Community. • RAINIER AVENUE BUSINESS-RELATED CRIMES RECAP FOR THE MONTH OF OCTOBER, 1996 ASSAULT: 700 Rainier Ave S.block Employee refused to sell beer to intoxicated subjects,who assaulted him and left the business. Minor injury received by the employee. AUTO THEFT: 100 Rainier Ave S.block '82 Datsun truck stolen/found next day by Seattle Police. $2500.00 700 Rainier Ave S.block '93 Ford in for service,stolen/2 adults arrested by Wenatchee Police 9 days later. 700 Rainier Ave S.block '96 Ford truck stolen/found next day by Tukwila Police, 1 adult arrested. COMMERCIAL BURGLARY: 200 Rainier Ave S.block Fenced area around business entered/radar stolen from a parked truck. $ 150.00 400 Rainier Ave N.block Shed and parked trucks entered/misc.auto parts stolen. $ 675.00 700 Rainier Ave S.block Window smashed/tire rims stolen. DISORDERLY CONDUCT: 500 Rainier Ave S.block 1 adult arrested for urinating in public. FRAUD/FORGERY: 300 Rainier Ave S.block NSF check passed at business. $ 144.00 300 Renton Center Way block 1 adult arrested for attempted prescription forgery. 700 Rainier Ave S.block 2 NSF checks passed at business. $ 15.00 LIQUOR VIOLATION: 300 Renton Center Way block 1 adult arrested for drinking alcohol in public. MALICIOUS MISCHIEF: 300 Rainier Ave S.block Paint dumped in business parking lot. $ 100.00 400 Rainier Ave S.block 2 windows smashed on a parked vehicle. $350.00 400 Rainier Ave S.block Tire slashed on parked vehicle. $ 50.00 500 Rainier Ave S.block Knife-thrown through business window. $300.00 700 Rainier Ave S.block 7 parked vehicles sustained minor damage. THEFTS: 400 Rainier Ave S.block Personal items stolen from an employee's locker. $ 40.00 400 Rainier Ave S.block Car prowl/window smashed/wallet stolen from the dash. $ 585.00 400 Rainier Ave S.block Coin-purse stolen from purse while customer was shopping. $ 36.00 400 Rainier Ave N.block 1 adult arrested/stole an air filter then tried to return it for cash refund.$ 10.00 500 Rainier Ave S.block Cellular phone stolen from unlocked desk in office. $350.00 600 Rainier Ave S.block Car Prowl/vehicle unlocked/cellular phone stolen. $315.00 700 Rainier Ave S.block Car Prowl/vehicle unlocked/cellular phone stolen. $300.00 700 Rainier Ave S.block Car Prowl/vehicle unlocked/jack and tire iron stolen. $ 10.00 800 Rainier Ave S.block Car Prowl/window smashed/battery stolen. $ 121.00 SHOPLIFTS: #ADULT ARRESTS #JUVENILE ARRESTS $LOSS: 300 Renton Center Way block 0 0 $ 96.00 400 Rainier Ave S.block 2 0 $468.00 DRUG/ALCOHOL ARRESTS: There was one DUI and three drug related arrests along Rainier Avenue,during the month of October, 1996 Renton RAINIER AVENUE Police Department Alan L. Wallis, Chief CRIME Business PREVUN ENTION 235-21571 January, 1997 Dear Rainier Avenue Merchants, Last month at 3:15 am, a robbery occured in a South Renton business parking lot, located in the 3700 block of East Valley Hwy. A woman had been sitting in her car (which was not locked), when the door was opened by a black male adult, about 6'00" - 6'02" in height, wearing a thick, black hooded jacket and thick wool gloves. The suspect held a gun to her head and demanded that she exit her car. He then forced her to give him her jewelry, coat, purse and keys to her car, threatening her with bodily harm the entire time. After the robbery, the suspect told the victim to run away, which she did, and he also fled around the building. The victim did not sustain any physical injuries as a result of this incident If you have any information regarding this case, please call Detective Gary Kittelson at 277-4488. It's important to note that the victim in this case might have been able to avoid the robbery if she had followed these safety tips: 1) locked her car doors, 2) turned the engine on while she was sitting in the car (she might have been able to drive away), 3) kept an eye on her surroundings to observe and react to any suspicious people approaching her car, or 4) asked for an escort from a business employee (the business was open) to her car in the parking lot. The Crime Prevention Unit provides FREE Personal. Safety classes that are scheduled at dates and times convenient for your business and employees. If you are interested in having a class presented, please give me a call at 235-2571. The Renton Police Department will be hosting another Citizen's Academy, beginning in January. This is a 12-week course that meets once a week for a two hour session. The Citizen's Academy strives to educate the public in how your police department conducts business and works for the community. Classes are offered on the following subjects: Patrol Operations, Narcotics dog unit, Bike Patrol, Emergency Services Unit, Police Investigations, Hostage Negotiations, Gangs, Drug Investigations, Animal Control, Use of Force, Shoot/Don't Shoot, Traffic Division, and Response to Traumatic Incidents. Those who attend the Academy are also able to participate in an optional ride-along with a patrol officer, and receive a tour of the 9-1-1 dispatch center, police department and jail. If you are interested in attending the next Citizen's Academy, please give me a call and I will mail you the short application form. Sincerely, Audrey Moore Business Watch Coordinator Renton Police Department, 235-2571 Citizens and Police:Partners for a Safe Community. • RAINIER AVENUE BUSINESS-RELATED CRIMES RECAP,DECEMBER, 1996 AUTO THEFT: 100 Rainier Ave S.block '88 Chevy truck stolen/found by Everett PD the next day. $6000.00 200 Rainier Ave N.block Yellow Chevy truck stolen,license#U1F552. $6500.00 300 Renton Center Way block '95 Ford truck stolen/found later the same day,in Renton. $20000.00 300 Renton Center Way block White '96 Dodge Neon stolen,license#714HBQ. $10000.00 300 Renton Center Way block '83 Ford truck stolen in another city,found in Renton parking lot. 700 Rainier Ave S.block '87 Honda Accord stolen/found later the same day,in Renton. $8500.00 700 Rainier Ave S.block '89 Honda Accord stolen/found by Tacoma PD next day, 2 arrested. $6000.00 COMMERCIAL BURGLARY: 300 Renton Center Way block Door lock pried/unknown what was stolen,if anything. $ 50.00 300 Renton Center Way block Suspects seen taking property from fenced area.Ran off when seen. $ 100.00 600 Rainier Ave S. block Business door found unlocked/cash stolen from safe. $ 259.00 700 Rainier Ave S.block Attempted to pry the door lock on a trailer/no entry gained. $ 50.00 FRAUD/FORGERY: 300-Renton Center Way block Suspects tried to pass a stolen travelers check. Left before police arrived. 300 Renton Center Way block 2 adults arrested for trying to pass a forged check. 300 Renton Center Way block Suspect tried to make a purchase with a stolen check. Left before police arrived. 500 Rainier Ave S.block 1 adult arrested for trying to pass a stolen/forged check. INDECENT EXPOSURE: 300 Renton Center Way,block Male suspect in business restroom indecently exposed himself to a customer. MALICIOUS MISCHIEF: 200 Rainier Ave N.block Possible auto theft attempt/window and ignition damage on parked car. $200.00 700 Rainier Ave S.block Hole punched in the dashboard of a parked vehicle. $ 880.00 ROBBERY: 500 Rainier Ave S.block 8:42 pm: White male adult suspect,between 25-30 years of age, 5'08", 150 lbs,with red hair,made a purchase from the store and grabbed all of the cash in the register when it was opened. No weapon displayed, THEFTS: no injuries received to anyone. Suspect fled. Refer to suspect bulletin. 100 Rainier Ave S.block Firewood stolen from outside of a business. - $ 40.00 200 Rainier Ave S.block Car Prowl/vehicle unlocked/purse stolen. $1100.00 300 Renton Center Way block Possible pick-pocket inside a business-wallet stolen. $ 34.00 400 Rainier Ave S.block Unsecured purse stolen from customer's shopping cart. $ 111.00 400 Rainier Ave S.block Unsecured wallet stolen from customer's shopping cart. $ 955.00 600 Rainier Ave N.block Car Prowl/tires and wheels stolen off parked vehicle. $ 350.00 600 Rainier Ave N.block Car Prowl/two batteries stolen from 2 parked vehicles. $ 60.00 700 Rainier Ave S.block Unsecured cellular phone stolen from a customer's shopping cart. $ 650.00 700 Rainier Ave S.block Car Prowl/vehicle in for service/2 stereo amplifiers stolen. $ 500.00 800 Rainier Ave S.block Car Prowl/padlock cut on truck storage area/tools stolen. $2300.00 SHOPLIFTS: #ADULT ARRESTS #JUVENILE ARRESTS SLOSS: 300 Rainier Ave S.block 1 $ 102.00 300 Renton Center Way block 3 $ 132.00 400 Rainier Ave S.block 2 4 $317.00 700 Rainier Ave S.block 1 $ 177.00 DRUG/ALCOHOL ARRESTS: There was one DUI and three drug related arrests along Rainier Avenue,during the month of December, 1996 City I , _ ?Won Department of Planning/Building/P Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 3 COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 10, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-159,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 19, 1996 APPLICANT: SCHNEIDER HOMES PROJECT MANAGER: PETER ROSEN PROJECT TITLE: OZBOLT CONDOMINIUMS WORK ORDER NO: 78169 LOCATION: 430 MAPLE AVENUE SITE AREA 1.99 ACRES I BUILDING AREA(gross): 50,124 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to construct two separate buildings, each containing 18 condominium units (36 units total). The maximum building height would be 35 feet. The proposal includes 66 parking stalls with 32 provided as covered garage stalls. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ HlstodclCultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS CYci fla414/77. 1-7-yri.,7`70,\__ ) / �` — Cod -s—acdo fo% /G�7-1 117d c3L� crM 6-.?cC4_. 7 ,"(7/.0 r -- aren60'1 (.am) i/60-, � 5 i6L -qua�,� G��9r� /> r� soza * ea: /mow -e ' C. CODE-RELATED COMM NTS d11� -/-41? SZe7 s /0592-1a2gM'IPC11j , 7 (./')/) 62-'7 Y--/-1.6,42, Zze.-(%r� /ct. G V 'Y7 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas _ where add''oval information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Mte,d) /P�/C7( Signature of Director or Authorized Representative D to DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10193 City 1__-—An1,__ Department of Planning/Building/Pie lk... -;; ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: it\Arn* t COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 10, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-159,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 19, 1996 APPLICANT: SCHNEIDER HOMES PROJECT MANAGER: PETER ROSEN PROJECT TITLE: OZBOLT CONDOMINIUMS WORK ORDER NO: 78169 LOCATION: 430 MAPLE AVENUE SITE AREA 1.99 ACRES I BUILDING AREA(gross): 50,124 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The applicant proposes to construct two separate buildings, each containing 18 condominium units (36 units total). The maximum building height would be 35 feet. The proposal includes 66 parking stalls with 32 provided as covered garage stalls. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts • Impacts Necessary Earth ✓ Aesthetics V Air Water IfLight/Glare J Plants Recreation V LancMShorellne Use Utilities I Animals ` Transportation r Environmental Health tl// Public Services V Energy/ 'tir Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet Vj 14,000 Feet ' 1/ B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS The site is located within the Airport's Horizontal Surface. The proposed building elevations, will be approximately 80' above sea level , which is below the Horizontal Surface elevation of 179' above sea level . A Notice of Proposed Construction is to be submitted to the FAA and reviewed prior to issuance of a Building PErmit because the construction exceeds a slope of 100:1. The proposed development lies quite close to the airport and represents a large increase of residences. As mitigation for permitting this development, notification of the proximity of aircraft/airport activity in the condominium deeds is requested. C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS If this project is approved, the construction of the condominiums within the Airport's Hordezontal Surface area will be considered as acceptance by the developer and subsequent owners that the operation of the airport and possible overflights of the area by aircraft of all types is a compatible use of the land. We have reviewed this :-•.cation with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where ad.','onal inform,• is needed to properly assess this proposal. A �" �� Signatur4 Director or Authorized Representative Date / DEVAPP.•• Rev.10193 a City IL.__inton Department of Planning/Building/P ,_, Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: S,lac@ I tetLekt"COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 10, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-159,SA,ECF I DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 19, 1996 APPLICANT: SCHNEIDER HOMES PROJECT MANAGER: PETER A,,,;, M.e."44 7111e PROJECT TITLE: OZBOLT CONDOMINIUMS WORK ORDER NO: 78169 LOCATION: 430 MAPLE AVENUE 9661 0 Z 030 SITE AREA: 1.99 ACRES I BUILDING AREA(gross): 50,124 Sq.Ft. NO.LN3 thc$ SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to construct two separate buildings, each containing 18 condominium units (36 units total). The maximum building height would be 35 feet. The proposal includes 66 parking stalls with 32 provided as covered garage stalls. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts • impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation LandYShorellne Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional i rmation is needed to prope ess this proposal. cF/ 9 s P Si nature of Director or Authorized Re resentative Dare DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10193 OZBOLT CONDOMINIUMS 36 Units 430 Maple Ave. SW do Schneider Homes,Inc. January 2, 1997 SEWER: (Wastewater) 1. The System Development Service Connection charge is $12,600. 2. Sewer cleanouts to be located five feet from building. 3. Sewer vertical profile will be required with construction plans. 4. Sewer main to be labeled "Private". 5. Maintain proper horizontal separation from water. The minimum separation is 10-feet or greater and vertical separation of 18 inches or greater from water. 6. Side sewer to have two percent slope. STORM DRAINAGE: 1. The System Development Services Connection charge is $7,040.18. 2. Drainage report incomplete. Attached to this review is content list for the drainage report. These items need to be addressed before a review can be completed. 3. Show calculation for Special Requirement#5 in the King County Surface Water Design Manual. 4. A vertical profile will be required with construction plans. 5. Clearly identify in the Technical Report all input factors used in calculating pre-development and post-development runoff rates-including areas, slopes, CN values, ect. 6. Clearly show and identify all calculations used in the design of the drainage system,including time of concentration calculations. 97cm001U 97CM001U.DOC\ DRAINAGE REPORT CONTENT LIST 1. Stamped and signed by a Washington Professional Civil Engineer on the front page. Complete Technical Information Report (TIR) Worksheet. 2. Briefly describe the construction involved. 3. Describe existing and proposed on-site drainage features. 4. Show that Core Requirements 1 through 5 from the King County Surface Water Manual (KCSWM) are addressed. 5. Show that all Special Requirements from the KCSWM that are applicable to the project are addressed. 6. Use the SBUH/SCS hydrograph method to compute required on-site detention. Use 2, 10, and 100 year 24 hour design storm events for pre-developed and post-developed conditions. this should show sizing for the peak rate runoff control (retention/detention) facility, with a routing table. 7. Biofiltration preliminary and conceptual design calculations, if the project site has 500 square feet of new impervious area subject to vehicular use or storage of chemicals. 8. Wet pond sizing preliminary and conceptual design calculations if there is more than 1 acre of new paved impervious area and meets other conditions of Special Requirement#4. 9. Conveyance velocity calculations, showing that major conveyance pipes have velocities of 3 fps or greater. 10. Conveyance capacity calculations. Show that all conveyance pipes on-site have capacity for the 25-year design event (hydraulic grade line at least 0.5' below rim of structure.) Also show that the 100-year design event conveyance fulfills Core Requirement#4. 11. A Level 1 Off-site Analysis, as described in Core Requirement #2. Level 2 or 3 analysis may be requested later if a downstream problem is found or anticipated from review of the initial submittal of the Drainage report. TEMPORARY EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL 1. Proper design for containment of erosion on-site shown on construction plans. 2. Calculations for a sediment trap for sites less than 3 acres or a sediment pond for larger than 3 acres, as shown in Section 5.4 of the KCSWM. 10 I i OZBOLT CONDOMINIUMS 36 Units 430 Maple Ave. SW do Schneider Homes, Inc. January 2, 1997 SEWER: (Wastewater) 1. The System Development Service Connection charge is $12,600. 2. Sewer cleanouts to be located five feet from building. 3. Sewer vertical profile will be required with construction plans. 4. Sewer main to be labeled "Private". 5. Maintain proper horizontal separation from water. The minimum separation is 10-feet or greater and vertical separation of 18 inches or greater from water. 6. Side sewer to have two percent slope. STORM DRAINAGE: (1/7/97 Update Drainage Report Review) 1. The System Development Services Connection charge is $7,040.18. 2. Drainage report update appears adequate. 3. Show how many square feet is subject to vehicle use. 4. A vertical profile will be required with construction plans. 97cm001U 97CM001U.DOC\ City i;.._._lnton Department of Planning/Building/P>, _.-'Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:?tom R 1ew —ICOMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 10, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-159,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 19, 1996 APPLICANT: SCHNEIDER HOMES PROJECT MANAGER: PETER ROSEN PROJECT TITLE: OZBOLT CONDOMINIUMS WORK ORDER NO: 78169 LOCATION: 430 MAPLE AVENUE SITE AREA: 1.99 ACRES I BUILDING AREA(gross): 50,124 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to construct two separate buildings, each containing 18 condominium units (36 units total). The maximum building height would be 35 feet. The proposal includes 66 parking stalls with 32 provided as covered garage stalls. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water UghVGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic-Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to property assess this proposal. zr/44 1/3/77 Signature of Director or Authorized Representa Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10193 OZBOLT CONDOMINIUMS 3'6 Units 430 Maple Ave. SW do Schneider Homes,Inc. January 2, 1997 WATER: 1. System Development Connection charge for 36 units is $18,360. 2. The propose 8-inch water loop system will provide 2500 gpm. The Fire Department requires a fireflow of 2750 gpm. A 10-inch loop system will provide approximately 4000 gpm. 3. Fire hydrant locations are not identified on the conceptual utility plan. One fire hydrant will deliver 1000 gpm. 4. Fire hydrant locations must be approved by the Fire Department. Three hydrants are required. The primary hydrant must be within 150 of the building and two within 300 feet of the building. 5. Water valve locations to be identified. 6. All utility and roadway drawings to meet City of Renton drafting standards. 7. Show location and size of DCVA for landscaping irrigation and irrigation meter.. 8. Show location and size of domestic water meter. 9. Water line loop system must be located in a 15-foot utility easement. 10. A vertical profile will be required with the construction plans. 97cm001W 97CM001 W.DOC\ City of Kenton Department of Planning/Building/Pu0Wortis ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET STY OF Revco d REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:-T re,d Zetat COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 10,•1 , o APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-159,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER iTEr62 0 1996 APPLICANT: SCHNEIDER HOMES PROJECT MANAGER: PETER ROSEN PROJECT TITLE: OZBOLT CONDOMINIUMS WORK ORDER NO: 78169 ✓�Ill"iVNt�C7 LA VISION LOCATION: 430 MAPLE AVENUE • SITE AREA: 1.99 ACRES I BUILDING AREA(gross): 50,124 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The applicant proposes to construct two separate buildings, each containing 18 condominium "units (36 units total). The maximum building height would be 35 feet. The proposal includes 66 parking stalls with 32 provided as covered garage stalls. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts impacts Necessary impacts • Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals ' Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • `a• ► \ `a c ► ! YIn �.k �O Y Y e V i 0,0 l -r € i-. 5 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where ad 110 al information is needed to pro riy assess this proposal. I �6`5G Signature of Director or Authorized Representative • Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 s OZBOLT CONDOMINIUMS 36 Units 430 Maple Ave. SW do Schneider Homes,Inc. January 2, 1997 TRANSPORTATION: 1. The transportation mitigation fee is $17,467.50. This is to be paid when the Building permit is issued. 2. Curbs, gutters and sidewalks to be provided on both Hardie Ave. SW and on Maple Ave SW. Curb line to match extended improved I street width. These improvements to extend the full width of the property frontage to the roadway. 3. Where roadway is widened to match existing street, the asphalt overlay must extend to the center of the roadway as shown in the City Standard Drawing HR-05,page#H032. 4. Driveways must be per City Standard drawing FRO1N,page#F006. 5. Maple Ave. SW - The Developer to provide for the primary electrical and the communication lines fronting the property to be relocated underground. Note on construction plans. 6. Maple Ave. SW. -Street lighting to be provided to City of Renton Standards. 7. Construction plan to show right-of-way lines on both sides of the roadway for both Maple Ave. SW and for Hardie Ave SW. Include roadway centerline. 97cm001T 97CM001T.DOC\ C City L_ __Jnton Department of Planning/Building/P ,_ _ Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 'DEPT. ���- Y�219e,��� COMMENTS DUE: JANU �a ,�! pta�I::AI! Fii'+� APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-159,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 19,,1996,, __�5 APPLICANT: SCHNEIDER HOMES PROJECT MANAGER: PETER RO PROJECT TITLE: OZBOLT CONDOMINIUMS WORK ORDER NO: 78169 EE� LOCATION: 430 MAPLE AVENUE iC �� SITE AREA: 1.99 ACRES I BUILDING AREA(gross): 50,124 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to construct two separate buildings, each containing 18 condominium units (36 units total). The maximum building height would be 35 feet. The proposal includes 66 parking stalls with 32 provided as covered garage stalls. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts • Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ HlstoriaCultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet /V e Ma j® r . mp4cis /.)®te l B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS A)A . C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS S'ee ac e-1 CO3ime47' 5 '7 We have reviewed is application with particular:ttention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addle nal in rotation is neede to prope�:ssess this proposal. a4 A t i el ' 4 / . -'-- kV/.5/1‘ Signature of Dir tor or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 TY S Oet • R . CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 412, MEMORANDUM DATE: December 23, 1996 TO: Peter Rosen, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal Ar v SUBJECT: Ozbolt Condominiums, 430 Maple Avenue SW Fire Department Comments: 1.The preliminary required fire flow for Building One is 2750 GPM and Building Two is 2500 GPM. Three fire hydrants are required for each building, one within 150 feet and two within 300 feet. Hydrants within the required distances may be used for more than one building. 2. Fire alarm and sprinkler systems are required for each building. Separate plans and permits are required by the Fire Department. 3. Fire Department access roadways are required a 45 foot outside turning radius and a 25 foot inside radius. The roadway needs to be modified at the southwest corner of Building Two. 4. The fire mitigation fee is required at $388.00 per unit, total is 36 X $388.00 = $13968.00 Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. • CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: JANUARY 3, 1997 TO: CLINT MORGAN PETER ROSEN FROM: NEIL WATTS Aka() SUBJECT: CONCEPTUAL DRAINAGE REPORT OZBOLT CONDOMINIUM SITE PLAN REVIEW I have reviewed the conceptual drainage report and drainage plan for the Ozbolt Condominium project. The drainage report has been prepared using acceptable methodology (per the King County Surface Water Manual), and concludes that the site development will require both detention and water quality facilities. The sizing calculations for these facilities are included in the drainage report, and are in the range expected for this size of development. The site plan has incorporated both a detention vault and a biofiltration swale, which are properly sized and meet the drainage requirements for this development. No further changes are required to the site plan at this time to accomodate the required drainage facilities. CltyWenton Department of Planning/Building/WE Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:GovtS-� JIA-vitiSey‘t iCL COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 10, 1197 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-159,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 19, 1996 k,,,ti APPLICANT: SCHNEIDER HOMES PROJECT MANAGER: PETER ROSEN A �4)4if PROJECT TITLE: OZBOLT CONDOMINIUMS WORK ORDER NO: 78169 6!O 7isyt, LOCATION: 430 MAPLE AVENUE 4fO 'dr;�..` '1Q SITE AREA 1.99 ACRES I BUILDING AREA(gross): 50,124 Sq.Ft. �'O• • SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The applicant proposes to construct two separate buildings, each containing 18 condominium units (36 units total). The maximum building height would be 35 feet. The proposal includes 66 parking stalls with 32 provided as covered garage stalls. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Infonnatlon Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts • Impacts Necessary Earth L' Housing Air Aesthetics Wafer Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 8 (LS V.1.1&(6 r:-%9 6XPig a ti) LIC&Dahaft . tketliM LPL SOILS ENGINEER TO EXPAND ON LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL. C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed fhi plication .h particylar attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addition n i e e to pro• rty assess this proposal. 12:n lto Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10193 . ' ( • . . . . ...... . . • , NOME & • . . . . . PENDING' APPLICATION PROJECT NAMEINUMBER: OZBOLT CONDOMINIUMS/LUA-96-159,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes to construct two separate buildings, each containing 18 , condominium units(38 units totag,The maximum building height would be 35 feet.The proposal Includes 88 parking stalls with 32 provided es covere garage stalls. GENERAL LOCATION: 430 MAPLE AVENUE ' PUBLIC APPROVALS: _Building Permit _Preliminary Plat -Short Plat _Conditional Use Permit _Rezone . )COX Site Plan Approval-Admin. )000( Environmental Review Shoreline Conditional Use Other -Permit Fill&Grade Permit Shoreline Substantial _Other -Development Permit The application can be reviewed In the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted any time prior to Public Hearings.during Public Hearings,or prior to an administrative site • plan approval.For further Information on the application,or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications of the Cilia environmental determinations,appeal periods and/or the public hearing deters)for this project,please contact Ule Development Services Division at 235-2550. • AO / Q ��J���i1j4j11 �1I� 3rd S 1p+�r Zarb Iii1 �,. 4 Olin* � •► �I • is aid I -ifi m-:i i C • .._ . :..„ _ _ . m-���,•n • • . ilibaise. kali. Oft AIK \ . 1... =,...1 E . . • ova.. w vp • • .•• erg .= 2, F0, viriti.i.L7) . yA�®� Ss;. "one ....I 44-1::: IIIII'- . ,,,, iir....--",an AM 1 ....will soh ... = __ • . • =• _•._ . . arA ,..11.,..7. .E 4 11 ►I -• ►r II I n-r --)-l- I II I r. II ,..:..a• -PLEASE INCLUpE,THE PROJECT,NUMBERINHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE,IDENTIFICATION:'.>'Coy. CERTIFICATION . • • i, SOvh . Ja.cicsur , hereby certify that 3 copies-of the above.document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on - ApnI � I', [t 1 Signed: 8Gax1cLiD C .(�)'/i) Yl . i 0 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • ) SS • COUNTY OF KING ) /+ • ` ' I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 41v.D1 2r�4G1«^l signed.this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and volume '1 .. for the uses `re o and purposes mentioned in the instrument. ��;.•• Y Dated: /?�/q `l. d GU • ti'3� Notary Pub is in and f r the StakeiotW.sh nglon A. `) :t-rJ Notary (Print) l�1 (r/1-ker,',31'r1 .)_LLAi My appointment expires: • k/0/9.P NOTAgY,DOC PENDING APPLICATION PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: OZBOLT CONDOMINIUMS/LUA-96-159,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes to construct two separate buildings, each containing 18 I condominium units(36 units total). The maximum building height would be 35 feet. The proposal includes 66 parking stalls with 32 provided as covered garage stalls. GENERAL LOCATION: 430 MAPLE AVENUE PUBLIC APPROVALS: Building Permit Preliminary Plat Short Plat Conditional Use Permit Rezone XXXX Site Plan Approval-Admin. XXXX Environmental Review Shoreline Conditional Use Other j Permit Fill&Grade Permit Shoreline Substantial Other Development Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. ::" Comments will be accepted any time prior to Public Hearings,during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site '`'' plan approval. For further information on the application,or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive "; additional notifications of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for I.,:, this project,please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. - "_J i- 17 lrur _Mt momffmS 2 T . '•" li . I lib -S%W hiliabilii 111%11111".... IMAM • • IN= M III q1111111111 111 5"" VIII 14,• lI IIIit irk ,� __-j, , �. kii 7 a► �� 4►i,, •0 JI ,d Sur Mu EN 1. • aft 444 5.7 -f ila -a - .. 1 I lisilgt* 044 aN j( N114* • . ay —ice =� . A%W.,410 lit,N • •. • - • , 41:C.„,... v3, . • iim ...= a P ... ia " • .rli.i 4 A• . i i& 4 • --,FI.• - r VVAlgrO iiiPlio � �� �in ter• 0/4e:i ‘ 400 - fps now affa am mai 11 am - - At= = ij'j : SW . 7th. ST ';;i. _ dt:. ,...a L • 'il I 11 .. 11-11 I try I 1 , r r: r r ; ..-. ... ,- hLEASE'INCLUDE'THE>PROJECT N' :.:..::: UMBER:WWEN:CALLING;FOR:PROPER FILE:::IDENTIFICATION.;> >« NOTICE OF NROPOSED SITE APPROVAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Approval (SA) and Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: OZBOLT CONDOMINIUMS / LUA-96-159,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes to construct two separate buildings, each containing 18 condominium units (36 units total). The maximum building height would be 35 feet. The proposal includes 66 parking stalls with 32 provided as covered garage stalls. / fib GENERAL LOCATION: 430 Maple Avenue G2G �' �y1 PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review /v t ,l�l r�� �� � ��/ Site Plan ApprovalC� � �, Building Permit eiftt, � 'r , The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division locate on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. a Hs H1 S 2nd • S It', SIII)th" mm 2,.../. tple."•Al..,f.•*it 1l '1 II_Q *//// t� Qt ro smAou imm • _ •. c� `ift,*l AlAe 3rdS( 1 .: (`i1iI1■ 7--- 1 airittift• timin4111 - 5: 0..1111, %pig _ ,-• 7 11_7 '� .♦ -1 - iii.I -a -� _am ._Ire.. ` � < ME EN m r w� is - ie -- -. .- 1SPJI._d4 %$4 ?L . , a 11 = r 4,1100Z ar Alla, *. -,,, A oi.1 pi_ jo pp.,. . _ig r arzpswillilW afti Sri -%1 . Ai, , VA Lt_.......0" . .. ,.... .;:,:ei..sit LI we 5-th. pz ir if t‘wporissi itow .:..la'iv =I = - - ill dig id me pa... .ilitia rirdillillikiliell011111111111111. 11111.1111111 111112 Ell=IN MEI MN WM ii !a. ow,/Inn w 1 • '-. _= - - Ara r L. — �� i - SW7.". - ,- J1, 7th ST �= _• di - .s L iil I I • 1 r u t-� r� .r I , t I , i < < .:-„ 0-, - •-. ' - • .••...:;2,-,-•' . • :•••••••,.:•::!...,•..:,,,'...-2'--....,..-:,--..,-..-:".-:.•-..:.-::::••,2.-.,.:=•-..-..;,,,,... T.:,:,,...t,,,,,,,:. b.,.,.,y.,..„:„,,..,,,,..„,,,:,.:.,....„,,,:„,;if,.„:„.,.......,,,,.,,....„...,..c IT, OF7:-. :-1 -,,,,,,,•,-.:,:...1,1:.,•-:'2.-.t,-.„' :".: .:-i.:-:....,-..1„;L;;'','.. ..--':':',-:; -,..':-.,E.'s.'.;., ...',,,',-.!..,%,,;-...,...,::,:-.,:,::::05, .;.; ••...F:'1!..2i.""i",,":;, ;':;-,--.',74':-..T.f,,---.;.-.-.',-...F.--f.....:,'..-:',;:--, --- .:••, _..''''Works Department , '''''', ...•.- .''''sr.-:...,:-'::,:::-...::f.';.,'1•4i•-•,,;',',..--i:.-',-;';',:',,-.:5;;..-:-.?:--.--,,-,:.-•?&:-..:Y1,-'. .:,..--;:.,..'.,;.f.!-%.:;-,-,--.,:-... .!-:`.3.--.5'..-.-.:- .,•-:-,...-..„;-.C...,..,-..:.:-.',..;'-;----..-:-',.,,,-i-.,;-'--...;'.,:i -_:,...--.....-'...--;:-::;.„:-.:------.-. .2';.',1"'-'/PU bile' , -. ' *,'.''''': .'".:-:•`:::: ..:;.'''..;-'..:.'lz:11 :-'[..-..'"'f'.7.- .:•--4j.::f;,:";• ••. '11)--,..\-:.'...:'1:t:.:::.:.''. ; .*:;,...-• :'.:,;':;,..r......,:-;,,,!..,;,.....„: ',.,7'::"7,, :i.;?-.:.:'.'-';_'. ENTON .:.:.:•:,,,: ,,3'•. .1.;!,;.:.: ‘,:',•::',',PithiniiikiBt111(41g1 '..: • ' ' •••• .-'• • • .,., ., . . , ....,kran ;.Mayor .. . , . -: ::'''' .:- :[71'5";'''''' ''' ''':':2:::?': '11.1:':''''':;::::: ::i--...•:'.-:*-•.: '::•,,: , Greggzim,meriaaUP_..r_..:;Anininisirtnr,. „.:•,..... ......, .- ..,, • --- - Mr. Kenneth Peckharn Schneider Homes Inc. •-'. ,'.-....1.--.j.:-...-:• :."....Tul(Wlia, ••,...: .:•;•••-..,.•,_..--,.--,.., ,,,--:..,,-.-:,...--1-',..1.1---.,'.:::-... ... ....... ;••!..-...-j.'-'-...-,..-,--.-.;.:,.:..•,,,',---;:....•-.:.•••:'.....-•..,L.•...,-.'- -'.• . •• ..'---......... -•-... ..• -.', -•,-.,, :: '..' :. , ::•'..''-,.' • . ... - • . ' '., ,,..-",•• -.:, :,••••..:":.:*:‘,:.'.::.'!',....".:::..•::::,..1'''.::-:.‘..•:•.-•''''''''':::::•i,uA 96-159i' - ''..'.• :' '''.--..' '. ''. •-•-•:0'bolt'Condos-.. ,:• _,--. _•-......••-•.?:•„:-,•..,,:.:;....-.: :,•,:,,5... ': "- ' . . •. , .- _..-,.,. . •.• . ,, .,...... , ., • ,...,.. . .,,......, , on March 28 and it appears to be consistent with the site plan that •' ... -,....::: . Assessment ....„, :, ..,....... .... _. . ., ,.. 2- .: • i•and schedule the -,...,.....,., , . unable.to formally accept • . ... r , - •-.. -..----•:...: • • ''''-'-.=.-".' -..."' '..:evaluated in the Larson Cultural--- - -''....- .':••••-•• , are -• - ,•- .. .•:: ..'..--•'.....-......:.•..--..-• -....,••-.-.,-.--..•••;:::••-•.••• SA,ECF Dear Mr.Peckham, • ••;• :_.•-s--..-,..•:. - .- • ,;•••••• -:-...' ----•••,---".. . "-•-not complete anc.i‘,..79.... ...:-...,-•...--: -• '.. - We received visedosniteCpan Resource full aPPlieati9P--- u -,•-; .'..--- •lioatiOn iibinittai.. .5uircments are provided ....,..,...:,;.‘„.-:•••,..,--,,- •-,.. ...,..s,,,,.......-..,-i.,..-.,.- -..---,:.,- ,-.„...s. ....,.., . , ...,,,..s,..,?....r.,. . ". . :" '''''''''.'• Y9917 . unew til the following application gii2'.'x 11').....,-::-.-,•:2........ ..,-',,•-•''..--,:• ' ".:•:...,--,::;.-,:•::::';'::`-•." •.: , s. .,,,.._.,:.:.-.,--- project f7,'......,.......,........•:-..,:-.-•-•.,•--::-:....,T •'''' ..1 ea lan.:pmT.reduction ,..:.. ... • • -:-... , ••••••'....,..,,,,•••-:"•-•.:1:, ...tandscape....., .....- copies, . id'pr''. vide —e-information..,.....-:,:-...-,,..;, ..- plan. ::::.....:.t:I's..ied. :fcr.inumnSitelPumlani,Review . ' ..... The-:.--- . . landscape plan- • ,..,... -, .:-.• as ing lots greater an f ' ' feet require a . . ••- ,-,-- -•••••••.•-; ., .-,,.-..•.......... the .ithio-oon00.018 • ..... ........-";7.-•-"-:-....z:•...:.....,.....:.:,....'-_,:.,,:::::,'._•‘- .6iarea as rn.•*1,r,‘qqui.T.01!/. 9.,,. -...,P ,. i....,.,:i. ,,....if.t ........;;..,_,!,--. . :-.......,,,......_ -,'-',';;. parking lot' .ianuscap7-„,,....-:-,„.....-••••:•,-••••.:.I. . .,. .....f.,.... -....::...':..'.'..:•...,,:.,..-.-'2".;,.;:::.,...'' '....::'.','''...../.''..r....:.'.. .,1.'!:, of square ... •_;;;,... ......-,-..,-,..-_,,::,..s..,..,...,, „.:,,,,, ,:::...,,,,.._,,,,..... • ..• .. • ....-•.....:..-.....-.-:•",..-,'':- • -. .. .•.„ ,,,•-•.:7:.:'.:-•.-',:-..:7,-:. -, ::;i'- -I...,:-,'Oc:7•.:(g in,„k 11)..,......,.. , ....:,.....,:s. ...,,....,.,.,,,,ii,th ,,..t,...,a.,, .i.i. ..i..4.....41.,i...aq71k.p 4 ,,..,..,.;........;...,..:.‘,. ..,...........„. . . ....-.,•,-..J.,-,;;-..-.;-.......... -:•.:•-•-_ Plan.., DNit.iv.,,i4etpn . .....-:•,---,....••••.-.-_,..,,,-,7-',"......:.: :-•••••.:-...',,,- -•-'-'' n •will not be .1..'''• '':-'.-'''• 2. Utilities 7i,.. ,'.... •.,,..._-':,.4.,7.,..-,:',';;-r:-.4r.3::•:::...:•'.-:;-?:..,"::'Supervisor,.ii.id he dptermine,....,„.., ...,...confirmation that the .:7,-..-.... ..,...... . ... . '' ''''''.''''''''•''.--:l'.:'''''''..*'-,.;;I''''''''.'.."'''. Neil Watts, Plan Review --site..-2c---,application,-..... .......„,.... •.:-...,•-• - ',.• based on your.P9-----...•:,.,••,..--. . .•-•• - ., ... ..._::...,;,.. • '-• i checked with • ----..-,,,-• . acceptanceof the, -plan .,„ .... , ..neceSSarY---•,.. • ,.. .....than• -- •:-.500..4abloty4T s of. ..,,,...-,...,s:,;-: graded on the site. -:.• -.,-;',• ,:.. r•dmg v.Your environmental.. .e4e..eicil§t...:.!:?. .--.--.../:-..-1'.....,...:,:l:...•f.'.material would be grad ":::-;..2:::•:;-:':' '- : .1 would inV-Oliel9§s.::-. -•.• -4 -....-'--• -- 1 500' "cubic y4,fd 9 - ..........,-;...,..I.,-;:.--.••.'-;,!;,:...',‘.:1'.:''.....;-::i .„',72.' J,required . ,.., ......:.,...... . • '"'' - -:',"•••••:',....:-,':.,'P1-91)9 ...•.,.:-: • . • ..- s-•'''-.'ihat approxpnate ....::...:.A.:•••••,•.:•-•• , land: ..6. 6 pennitsarere.guLL. •••••:-...,;2.•,.......-s:: Renton=;''''''. Municipal' Code.•• :••••- •••. . ...,..... . _ which an applicant.„ -• •,.•-• '.-,''.',.:... ''....% the. ,:...::.:,...?:•,:-..,,,••complete.•-- Time periods 1p.. , -c•..,.. . :. .::. i.,_.,•,;„:;•....:,...,,-..; •December;-.-1 . .16.1996 statps.., .,.., ...,,. ., „_.„...,,,',......-;...-%, •.-.-' .-:.-. -,,-. ''':' '...•‘''. ''' '. •36 of final decisions on:, .•,..••• • tplans are excluded: s-- .• „:.:-...... .. Piiitiiiiit to Chapter.,.,,..•.., ...-..... application is, ,.:.. -.-L. studies,Lor.correct , ,,.• ,...- •---:•• • ...• ,•-.-.- • ....,.-,-., •• -........'•••-••••••'[....-.•-••••••'?:.-.'-•-ihih.f20 days .. ... --. nrm required • •': • ' - - .:" ' ---4 additional -. .,.....,.:-.. .-..- ,-1 information,- .-Petf- -.7...... • -•:.-•:,.:----. •js and February- that : •-: • •.:: .......:,.,,.. .• the date an i''''.1• '';. ;'''.;4- elilic:i• '' ..' is e • .....'...:::. ,.'.---.-...."..i.....',..-.•:s.fil':'-'.....i7:.iiiio...•,.i'a''...ptOtr'je:SA. .dit.it0. .y....-;tii„,i6ie''.notifipd fri-le#,..erS,..,ofi.j..!n.:,611:676.fii,...,:intooria...06.4 iegncStedboV7.•_:......,.....:•:,.....:,,,,,,,,,,•:......s...:,. fr6n,iihe 110 day time 41P1 ....-:,,,,-.-.,. . _. e •• .:,. ...-s.,••_-::, _ __..,_;.,._• ...,..,..... _,., ..,required in order..0,9v0.1,Je;y04....i:,,P„....„i926°!a.120 :,.ti4.,..,. i time 0-.-e7.04.....0. ..,llreCoMn-enee:„_:-.., -...:T.'.:..,-.....,..:•..H--;::,...i'.,....:,.._.,:-...:.c..,.......;;... . . '• •••.-•..s-'.--..-.....-irif filiation was.. . -.. ....,..,.....-:- deemedr 6cthiplete an”•.,,.. ....r•-:-..-,-,,,,.. ; r,........,: :•--.•,.r-,,.-_-.---.-..-i,s..,„:.::.;-.;L..: •,.,,...-.•:•.s.,...•,..... si ...._:.-.;:-.•••,-...:,..:-...,,...,,..,,... If you have any -••••,.:.:!;•••r„,.........•...'... „...eeived;your application„..,...-...-..,.... P •-..--'''.''..:.'''' ''''. . t.135-2719::',----..,'.'.".. •'. ...'-'..::•-"-.,•.:'............•••:-••••-•..,:',..-‘•••":•,..:'.-:•-. •••:••-•.•:'_,••••'-.• ••,•-•... • .•-•Y.-:"'.--.-'-'.;;.-- *-'-::,-7.-:71:-,.;:st..-- further,-...-::';''''.--:j'':::-.-•:'...' please call,pcP..,,,,,.,-,, ..,..:;::,,,..,...1,-,:,-'-....--.,-...-. ':;:..;:..••...:.-::-.:?'',•:•,-;..i..-,:::,',.•--•-_•::--:,•::::;•,:•'.:'-. .,'::::',...::••.:..•.;-...-....,,-...;.•• . ;. - --.-:-......•-•-2-.::;....-,..(...-.-;-.;••••:',.•,,..'•':--..-,-,,::::::-..:::.:-..;..,:::.,..:::,....--,-.;; :,...-....•.. :-.--;;;'-',..--7.--.....- ;,;-.., ....'..:-..--.'•-• ";;: : ....:Sincerel .r: • ....•••.;... .-.:,-' •,,.... ..',... : .., .,.,-...,..:::.....•:. ..-. ::..:,-.:, .'.........:-..,.-,._•,-.....,.. . .:..---•_-_-,.. .-J:-;.,,:,:••:-....::::,•••:-.-..,-,'..„"::il....:::;•f'...,...---...,,..:,.....',.-_..---- ••••',....';.;.••':'....:. ..,:7,-, . •.: :.7: _.•-.'-:.7:•::',', . . ...,',.....:-",.. ....'.. ...•::•-;,-;.•--:...',-*1.!'.. :., : :: •-.2,.::,;.:;1: • *-r.',. •:- :',._-........:....:'''.'1.".,:. • • -.. -••:. • • '•••••''''...;-,',.,•'t.'1A- ,,-•-''''..-:'.7:...,.f.-..,.1::,`.::-...."..::::':''':..'.;:":--"::.•:'r' ''.:.'.'•:•"t'':..--:.:'.-......:'.:.•':'..,.''.-:,'.,"-.;...'.'f:'',";.,:::::':'.::'...''.....-.::.•.::'t:''i:::(j . ; "..''..r.k'if"r..,:'..._o,.,.:.,,-,.,.,,.,......--2.:.::..1.-.:.-.,:''.::.:.r:..-..',..,•.-,;...:.:,!.,..'";...'.::2:'::..:•,:,,..:::.;:;;-'.;--::;.:-:•':,-'':,'',.-.:-,.-;:.--,'.•.-•:.::::.'•.''':.':'.;;:.";;:- '.:.....,,-.......:,.'......:-'...'.,.-.:',1..•.•..';': . Peteitosp , , ..:.'..F: Project Manager . .. " , . , .:.;.:. •,-. ,•:...-......i.....•,:::?.-„:',:...'.';,::,':-'.,.•',•.;..;,..::..",_.,'.k,':::,.::'::-•••-•.',-.:•,..'.'..,.,.T.-.'...-.',-:.•;'•-...f,.-.'::'.:'.-..••:•:.:::.-:-.•j-;-.--.:,.-:.:.-:.:.::::..,::'.-::.,:.,-..:".:,::.A:'',-...1,..•;-H::!-;•:1 1..,.'?'...,-1.:..;:..,‘..:.,2..'.=.:..,•:.:*'_'.:..':.:..:'',.".,!..-.,.....;.:;.,.':,",„,....‘:•.4.-:,:,.-....'..-....,:::":;-,,:;,..;-;1-'.:;,,:.:;:,.':.......'.::.•:..:,:.••..•..:.::.:'':.':,•,•-..,','.'?..''''.,...'.,,,.-.,„'.:':,.'1..',.:,-..;::.,.::.:....::..,%•"...,,:.,..'.:'•;.::,'!1,.:,..::1,..::.,.-.,'•',•,.,'•..•:.;.-..'...:... -,-, '',."-In.'.-.•::::.,..'•--.....,;:-::::•;e'-..,-,.:,,,:.,-.-.1.--.__:-_-::-',',.'.:..... .;.:-:-..!..:.-.:-:'•:-;:':.-,:,.',-- -;,'-‘-''.f;-.-.,:--,i.:...-;;,:'::i....-..l'....",-":-.":-:::-. :.;.,..--'-.,-•1.--:.--,-".:-.:....--:.v.i.....--:..."-2-",...7.-,,,...,-1.'...--.-:-!........----: '-:. . ..--.;:....':2-•::-.;,-,-=',',- .-..',1::1":;•::.:,...T.,':-:-..":!,."---;,:-:r_ .;-•••_:i:-r-Ov .--..-4'::.....'.:-::.'rr-;::--'17..--..'.--'.:'.."-1---:,:.::...,,;',:'-,:":11..:-;,.,:.:;---.:;;',..;,-;,..:...'. :;!...•.-2. -..,...;-;-..-,:-.-..:-:...:,..,...:::,..s....:-.-:-:, :-..-;':',.,.. ::..- _-...,., :.......,.....-:.:,-::„..,.;7,•.....:'.:..:,7,.',.':::.2.,,':-....-;:':"..:V.:' :::::':'';;:'''...:".....' ''':::"•'....:;:'•';.:::::-:',.*:.-''':''':...';''''''':.;•'..;:'.'7';• ':'.:!:.',-,:;•.:.•.:-i.'.7:-:"::"°.S;.•:'•:.i.::'.-'7•''::.'-..".-'''.-:L',,....-;...-.":::':,';.:;F'::".•-i;':-:&..-:?;.::-.:::='.':;,,,:',i'•':".1:.;.'.'.•'....-,;"1.-''..f;"'-'''.:.-'..C.::-•.'•".,...:::,...f:...,:,;-:..'i;:•"...,:::::.!,,T:::::;.•-,%:;-;',::•;::: -.;•;;'.','::::..1,-,;:,..7:',••k":, - ' •-•'l..:.:',......'•-..--:•:..:::•C;;.''''.:.:- .:-'•'.'J.'.-.`.4•.`..'-:;...*-.,-" '.."::'-t17-f..::-:---.-"i:•',:::'•::;;z:"'"1::.;;=---;!-:::'.-‘''.-.."%f.'1--F7-''''&.•:.!ii.:::,-..,',!,.t'-:t .:"..:',.-...; :::.'''''' '!"•-,..j`e'.'.::.',:::,: ...;-•,'..;%.;-:;:•:::,''..::: -...'?.L......-,'."'?'::,;',24,':::::::$':',.....''....‘S,.:',:"1.'''•;;..-'',...:•':;:;31,5"';.',:l•' :.ic.....;, i7''()71)01t..:1'.PiiiiiertY PWIleP•:::::.•,.. :;:-',....,.---.••••••-;•-,.',.--i‘..;;,.i. :,.,...,,.....: -..-.:: ,,,...-..:-..... .A:;:',...-.'.;:••••:.....;.,,:-..,-•!--:-.,,,,,.:,4;.•••••••.•-i.:•,;:-.,,,,.;,-...,„-:•,:s•••,..,..•.,...!..-.,..---•-r„..,:•.-,;,,-,-...,•,;•::,-. . : '•---..-.--'-'.-....'.-•.7'.11...,.‘,. - -it,;;;and Lu-‘,..7 •••••..-• -. _,-?......-",,, Land.-'-•- 4i. --. ,`.-iilii3f,..`,_5.--,.ii:,•:::,.....,,'„--.-1;.,f..r.„ii,•-.-:.---,,;,7:,;$:::',.-,L-2.,,,..,...-".i,',,C,';';'•J.<-:'„':.,,,',','.,-,.....,,,;-,:::::!.....:,--7:.;.:-,•,,,.-.,:,..-;-.,..-2:,...:-:',-,...=.4.„.:..,,,,:.. ana ..... . '. cc Salvo n''''''''•''':.;''Y ."'•'-'' City of RentOn- use..,,,‘c!r,7„,,,,,,,...,..,:.:••••:,P.,:::!.,-.:,;,..': ••,••.:•:-.;:;',.:-.::..,`::-.r?.-.,i..,,,,,,..;•.:•::::::.-5,,,T.:•::,,-:::-..... --,:-:•.:!.:.1„,...:.•.•,,-,-,.-_--..i.-,..-.;.-,•..... .....-..2.:-..,...--..7,•-_•••••••...:.,,•:_.,i,•„-;,-,i.,:...--... 'f.-,'f...2.••••'.:-,.i,...-:-!.'.'-:.-:-•••••i -Hilerter.:: i!:yr , .s.,:•, ,,,,,,,, ;.:-..,••,..,'-'...•.,.-..:-,•-=c•t...::',..:':r.c.,•••,,_•-•:•,••'..::-,--;•-...•-...-:,•..,,...i.-i...•••.. ..:•.-,. ..":•.:::•......:-.:•• .•-• ::.,•.: •-.-•-•-•-:-..:.,.,', ••':•.-..,•.;!....-.;::::1-•,-..., -..--:,..,..:•:;7,;.,....-.4„:•<•,...-:-•••.-;•.•`•••-••••:::-k•-::•:. . ....,-- --...,:,:•:'-.•-..-..'•',-.....---:'.:•:-....-‘,--: -.-.-.,:-.;.••-•,:t.-4:-.:.4,2,...-'-'.4.-r..-:;:1:f-::P.:T,".-....--3,:;.:-?:i.l.:!, ,"ki•:::- .;`:?;1-.-:.::-',-r:':::,..-'...:',.',...:-::-.:'....=T:'"-':-g'''.-:'-',::;;.:.......i"..`,--",''''''',-1.1-:''::;..Z..-:'=:':..'::-....4'.4:'..i.s:.=,;-...':''41e,r;%.',...i:/,'..'".;,.',.,.-'...',':1';.%:::: ,:::-.:ai:;.r.'7'':':',*.::,:::',",'S':1•;,,I.i:•/.. ' :'''.-1.' ,:.;,::::.':-',.2 "...:'.-:'44'...:i;',:!;'''.7.;Vr:i;',',:,•;f;?'',;:"?'''::';',:.-..:-,5-:-,-:?.,--`%:::-.:.';'.'s.',!'":.','..!,--L.i4-:.::::;':::';`77.".:S.'.7:?':::;.,,i3i.: -...-.1-::;,:.'1';':V,',':::';'!:;',7;-`i.Y,:'-''Pl.: :.1'•:':,.;:•`'..'':'!!•-0'.,!'•:',-.•,,`;', ,. :',...,"'..C'4 t::.':'.`;‘,',..'','I '..-:...-..::',7:":;;4:'.':'-'c'',-;`,.!.:', ",;-2.`,e ,-,......f.',.. -. !....;.:,:1:':',:'---,_..:!,';';';' ,.;':: :.'•:-..:::',,i.".`.:3'1.'1:f5, -..,f'-;';',:i-.r:!'-'.:i'..-'1:?-',:'-'-:.,!:.;'.:,'`.,'-' 12'....::,,,:-...:-:?..;;;,-.1-i'(.;',--.=:Y•i....,-.1% ;:'j'i,,:a*.':.V. ,.2-ei!:!,.-f.';;;;:', :,:": ::" :',''',";'''''..':::',',F.,:t;''-'-isz!'::.'Li,,',..':,§:: :,'-'1:.`:',;4:;-f:'(....a::°;-'.:',''.);q:':,.--,'F..'::',.;,...;' ,.-..=:7';',':;,::':'..-,'... :- ''''''' ',..::-''''..:':':;',:;','",...:A.:".:'': ::•')-'1..:: .;''-'-';'.'i.,'-5.:.L.,:''''Y5.-;:;.'::;-:•::,: ;:',;-::::%11'.1::;::;::-;''';'klj'i?.?;:;.:.:-'.',.*: Z.-;•-!)::;• ,..'•:-,';',.,L'6;fg...5t:',;4f.t. .g.'N 'i.,;.;',<..5''!';'-'::::::;.;',,:.'-'::..Z'':;.)',.:::::;,..‘:::: :',':,10:;',1;:;::'"';','''.'' '-'':':::::-.'1:-.',7:,..q'::-;,-',:4'...--..'•:',:.'....:-...::':',..!.... .1.1::::',:1:':;.3.7..--. :',-,j":,,'-:.‘..-:•:,.,::.:..,:ILY,:f:". -f.;.,:,;!::',;,•:.,;:i',',"';;;_',..1;-,F;:i';';';';',7-:q.';'-;;•..Q. ,;•gS1.,.,',ic,V;;';'.4.*:t.71,:s.7: 1::.-F,1%;,;',;',';:,,f;: !.;;.ifi::,'.1',:;:::::1'''i'!:,'!3'.. ,V:"; ..1':VO,', :;'.'iLi"...":".;:::::i'S.1::: :.,t-,;;:-,::i'rcr.,;:,,a:;-,',;.Y„,.1:':!....,.::::i':;::::l'•-;-,-';',:::::.;-.:f!......;;L::,:',°,;`,`.,::L-i:•...-.,.:::.;,',-:::,.;.'.. . -'';'-'''-,'-',:f,'.:'•--i,,'I'''t;'',',''P;'•:-'''':'k:".';;'"i::i..;:1';'?.k''I':,',','L'.':;k-t'"-N':,,;;:.;t'::;',":;',!&Z-..V.:2;,-,?.-::,y, !:,- .:/j,:;,..,:.,',-,,,,zz,,,N,',:.,.'-:::,',..•.,i'„•5.•`k:::,W,:L'"1; ,,!.„;:...-t-':',,!„:.':,:-. C''',..-:::::',::.-1-...:.."';',:.. ',f•=`:..,.:.i:',.;:;':::F.,;:::: 1'..'7;:2.1`. ',':::':'''''''..i. ;''''''.-\:''''''-'7.....-..''' '''..:-'''''''':::, ' ''''.1-1:'-•-;'''".:•''117,7,..,'''',? :-r...,-- ;•;','..'',,,-1•'-,..:',,,,,'-';‘1,-S's"..'""•:'',. .i.‘::''':' -1',''"A•TC.::`,i-'..".'.'..-ir'''::-.::,:''.:.: ;:::•.!-,"!--4•:-- --,.;''''-3..i?":,'.,'-,:t",.'.',•.,;',F:-",•:'-,,,,,,1-i;i-,L..1.. ..,-„,_E,:!:;.-.-2;7;;:..,.,‘:,::.,...•.:,..,..:i,-,z....,„,.;-,...i.,,,„...,,,,,:-,,, .,. ... _,„..„,...,_:.,,.;i,.,..,.,. '-'''.'';,,•..."',,''.1-''.,--,',...,,,''',..'•.7i'-'"?..I.':.,:,,i;i';':....i...-1...',6Y-...'..:en. .:7;;,;...r.t..."--:-:,:„.t-!-:,1.*.,,,;7.:;../.':::i!-,,!.-s.,r,I 4,....j,i-,:,,,,,,..,.,y,;..,.;.:,.,,,,,...,,;,,,...,:„.z,‘:::••;;.::;.;_:,•2.-.,.;;;;;.'...,,,2,...!:!,k,.,i:-..;.:::--.4,-;-...-::,,..-.::....,.-,. ''',. .„.:.,...,..„.., ,...,,.,...!,,,-:,4:- ..-...:..., .,-..-,-....',.r.::?.::- ,.....:-•-!..:-- ... -,.- .....•.... '.:':..'...'.1::::.'?:,:: :,.:'•:', '•2'.''',.:':-f.2:;1',.,'!-;;;Y.:-:''';''.1,-"J'''-r-i,:Y.':. .s.;'.::,C-J,-C,;,..2:?;.--;;T,..7.i;>.,-;,,,y',•,::!,l:-..:".Z ',...,'":::,:: 1:;..-•,::'j:s.;::,',,,-,L:'f..,`,7;`,.!,..',,,,j.,-;..;',;',;-'::::;1;,.LF::-''':-.L i-'.;:•-''-:,-''. ._..., ,,.,..4 e c ;.4.,..7.::::::s,,,,'..-;,-,•.::,:-:,.,;.:-.:,;-::-..:.,..::-:.:i..,,.,,..! „._.,- • ...'::.. ,%.1..fic'e::,.',',;.!-.:;V;-.7:::;;;: :''....'il•;.;.,A;,: :::?::',:- --Li"...W.:::::5 '..!::.`„,:,:!,i',,I.i.:;.:.iitlf...,..t,..".,•.",-;;;L:::::;.. ,-f 'f...`;',-.-.-,'-•T,'.--'.-.-:..,.,,,.;, ,..;,. , , Renton,Wa. hington?§?....„. ...,„:-;•,...:.., . ,••,_.•-.... .. ';*....'",.'",:::':':::,:f--;•.--2;,..;.-;<1::-?[:f:':'; '-'-!';'-;' ...?...•,-..: 200 Milll'4V(.:-.61 ..0'$,. 41 .. ,--;-';',''''':-•.'=-'''''''''''''. '.i.-:_:-.'j,•-•-: ;•-:',•',•-. -.',..?',-..2.;;2:-..ic..!.':::-'i';':7::,:t.:; ;,:.:c"..;-:':-;-:.3;-..-:.••.--i.„,•;•-.,:-.,:: ,::;,'',-'----.-•-•--- -- n n schneider homes, inc. 6510 Southcenter Boulevard•Suite#1•Tukwila,WA 98188•(206)248-2471•FAX(206)242-4209 March 27, 1997 Mr.Peter Rosen Project Manager City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 RE: Ozbolt Condominiums Dear Peter: You requested that I submit a letter addressing the cultural deposits on the Ozbolt property. Given the footprint of the proposed buildings,the only area or feature that truly needs to be addressed is Stratum 2.1 and Feature 2 per the Larson Anthropological Archeological Services(LAAS)report of July 17, 1996. It is our intention to adhere to the recommendations made by LAAS,in so much that any grading or excavation shall not exceed depths of two to two and a half feet in the areas of Stratum 2.1 or Feature 2. In addressing the area surrounding the Oak tree,we will comply with LAAS recommendations to have a professional archaeologist and tribal monitor on site during work in that area. If you have any questions,please feel free to call me at 248-2471. Sincer- , 1 K- neth E.Peckham chneider Homes,Inc. like° 0 :a �99� Ev \ O00 pF SC-HN-EI-245 P8 :,, - - CIT Af :OF-.RENTON :Planning/Building/Public Works Department w. .:.:Jesse Tanner,MayorGreggg Zimmerman P E. Ad mim'strator• February 4,1997 - • ' Mr.Kenneth Peckham Schneider Homes Inc. 6510 Southcenter Blvd. ' Tukwila,WA: 98188 - RE: Ozbolt Condos-LUA 96-159,SA,ECF- - - Dear Mr.Peckham, •. We received a cultural resources overlay map of the Ozbolt Condominium project on January 22. This : map reflects the field investigation conducted by Larson Anthropological Archaeological Services (July 17, 1996)overlaid with the presently proposed site plan. The map shows the location of trenching and - identifies cultural resource areas which are then discussed in the Larson report. It is obvious from the overlay map that the site plan and building layout of the present proposal has changed significantly from ' . the site plan utilized for the field investigation and the cultural resource assessment study: Therefore, , the cultural resource assessment is not adequate to evaluate the potential.impacts of the proposed site • plan on cultural resources. - • -•. - "A letter was sent to you on February.28, 1996 following a pre-application meeting which stated that "An archaeological reconnaissance should be conducted as part of site investigative;studies, and that '.. -reconnaissance could be limited to trenching-in'specific areas:where building foundations would be proposed ":The site investigation and trenching conducted by"Larson�was specifically limited to those areas planned for building excavation and the,study was tailored;to-limit';further disturbance of the site (see Figure 2 of the'Larson report). In fact,the'applicant'surveyed and staked the proposed boundaries - of the building foundations m the field for the trenching investigation: :The layout of both Buildings A and B in the presently.proposed.site plan no longer,conform to the trenching and site investigation as previously'conducted. " .f - : - We are unable-to c• onduct SEPA environmental�reviewbecause we do not have sufficient information to - evaluate the potential impacts°of,the„proposed''project."'WAC;197-11-335, requires"a lead agency to : make its threshold determination based<upon infoniation-:reasonably. .sufficient to evaluate the • : ' environmental impact of a;proposal. .The State Office'of Archaeology and Historic Preservation and Larson recommend first that a proposal be`designed to avoid Uimpacts and protect in:place :cultural resources. If deposits cannot be:avoided then a testing program should be conducted to determine the • significance of the deposits and then follow State laws to develop:alternative plans for recovery and - • •There appear to be three alternatives available to the applicant at this time first, You may withdraw your site plan application; second, you may resubmit your site plan reflecting the previous building " layout that was evaluated in the Larson report;'or.:third,.you may request a time extension in order to conduct additional site investigation. If.you.request a time extension, please provide an estimated . schedule for submitting the additional information.•`Please respond in writing as to how you wish to' . : : proceed with the application. - _ ; ''' .If you have any questions`or if I can be of further assistance,please call me at 235-2719.. ,. :. .,Sincerely,' . _ e j ....... . • " - , .. . . . . , _ . • _ . - - . . , , . ,. .,. ,:._:::„...,Pe ter Rosen' Pr _ o ect Manager -: `cc: Sal L ..vo'and ue�•°Ozbol :Pr J _t- o e" 0 r ..Y• p wne s rtS' - anH er it - :J a uerte C •of R ri Renton Land e to _-and Use;Su ervisor' ......t3' P -. _ OOMi11 Avenue'South°"{``Renton;Washington 98055 ©t.This paper contains'50%•recycled material,20%post consumer " - 44 �:,rti CITY ::)F RENTON -U. :f; Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator • January 13, 1996 Mr.Kenneth Peckham • Schneider Homes Inc. 6510 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila,WA. 98188. RE: Ozbolt Condos-LUA96-159,SA,ECF —Additional Information Request Dear Mr.Peckham, ; The Development Services Division of the City of Renton has determined that additional information is required in Order to continue evaluation of the subject application. The application includes a cultural.....' resources assessment prepared by Larson:Anthropological Archaeological'Services (LAAS).. The, : ., report describes findings relative to a field assessment conducted to determine the:presence of cultural '', d ns`for• _ . eposits:on:the site and includes recommendatio 'mitigating`'unpacts•to`cultural report includes a site plan with the locations Of identified`or.potential areas of cultural resources (Figure • :_2 and Figure 5). However," `the:siteplan°'submitted with the'.application shows different building::': •• layout (principally the orientation of Building42 or B) than hat:shown'in the cultural resource assessment. Therefore, it is not possible to ascertain the location of cultural resources relative`to'the,. proposed site plan. :The applicant should submit a site plan that overlays and accurately reflects the:'r cultural resource Mapping conducted by Larson Anthropolo cal'Archaeolo Archaeological Services AAS 'The cultural resource assessment discusses that some,'cultural deposits'are found a certain depth below the -- ground surface and construction excavation could impact the'cultural deposits if exceeding a specified depth in the mapped areas.. The applicant'should:provide detailed information regardine proposed grading and 'excavation in those areas mapped with the -cultural •resources, m order for staff to` adequately evaluate potential impacts of the project on cultural deposits. <'." ';; : The proposed project was tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on January 21, 1997. This meeting will have to be rescheduled and the new date will depend - on when the requested information is received for evaluation by staff '.: Pursuant to Chapter 36 of the Renton Municipal Code, final decisions on land use permits are required within 120 days from the date an application is deemed complete. Time periods in which an applicant is requested to provide additional information, perform required studies, or correct plans, are excluded from the 120 day time limit. Once the requested information is received.to the satisfaction of,the Development Services Division,the 120 day time limit shall recommence(Section 4-36-7.H.1). 1 If you have any questions or if I can be of further assistance,please call me at 235-2719. S.r cerely ' • Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: Salvo and Lucy Ozbolt,Property Owners Jana Huerter, City of Renton Land Use Supervisor 200 Mill Avenue South- Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer • L . ' •. 'A ' A \ S. - /` , - -.-- _.. ' ' ..., r b ,' r"ir''2k. ' r. LARS.ON 1 :i�'� `r . ANTHROPOLOG'(-CAt =4 I ,•; :) , " , - ARCHAEOLOGICAL -''`` . '_y . -s' ` SERVICES July 17, 1996 - . • ✓7l ; . 0 . 1 9 • o �F�F�op :- 19 6 Mr. Kenneth E. Peckham - • ,,.. • Schneider Homes, Inc. _ --- oil /Vc 6510 Southcenter Boulevard; Suite 1 - - . ,Tukwila, Washington 98188 ,- - ..RE:-.. Cultural Resources Assessment of the Schneider Homes Renton Apartments Project, , - - ., - Renton, King County., Washington , - • . _/ • - . • Dear Mr.Peckham: - .Larson Anthropological/Archaeological Services (LAAS) was retained in June 1996:by • Schneider Homes, Incorporated,to conduct a field assessment of the proposed Schneider Homes Renton Apartments Project on-the Ozbolt property in Renton,.King County, - Washington. The project area is on the west edge-of the pld channel of the Black•River, "now Hardie Avenue S.W., in the SW 1/4, Section 18, Township 23 North,,Range 5•East; '_. ' .•_ Willamette Meridian (Figure 1). Field assessment was conducted to determine the presence of • - cultural deposits in an. area adjacent-to, and partially including the Sbabadid Site (45KI51). . - This letter report summarizes field assessment of stratigraphic exposures in backhoe-trenches - excavated in areas for-proposed building foundations and describes cultural•deposits identified in the project area. The cultural materials are part of the Sbabadid Site (45KI51), an' - archaeological site which probably is eligible for listing On the National Register'of Historic _ Places (NRHP). Recommendations are extended regarding future treatment of the cultural „ deposits and-include preservation.of some deposits in place, archaeological testing of'some deposits to evaluate significance, and construction excavation monitoring of areas by a _ professional archaeologist and a tribal monitor. - - PROJECT DESCRIPTION , The project area encompasses approximately two acres of gently sloping hillside and level floodplain directly east of a historic channel of the Black River and north of the broad, level Black River floodplain. The proposed project includes construction of two'apartment 0 buildings and associated parking areas, subsurface utilities,'and entry drives (Figure 2). The . north edge of the structural foundations would be excavated into the hillside to depths approximately five feet below grade, extending to depths from one to three feet below grade`' • on the south edge of each foundation. Locations of the apartment structures, entry drives„and • \ f - s _ • - PLO: BOX•7'0106 _ • -. : SEATTLE .- • WAS-1INGTSON • "98:107;' • • TEL:a(206]'782 . 0980, • • 0 ' FA'X: (206] 783 . 2459 r_ r j • • • 4-4.- 71 Fir,°1' .1;'\17-"%. -,.. :1-"WirIMTIMmifil„-_, .i.--;.?rir'I'' ',%...i.,41.,..15y. ...• ttir. ,z, ., i. ,..1,0‘.. ,.. . tAcil' ' 1'-`.��I .1.1lllllll>S,III , ,u, -.\ ‘ 4,1:ka .'.•' �, \;.., 1 , •illit _-, iriv. :. .i.,ii_... Ai NIB).t":-• c 1 , I A- ,1 - ,;,-?;:.•.-,i ra I . ).. , .-„ MIME= . : •, ".,\ 1 ' -;,-;74• .- s*"; •z-i:-.5.-i,400 !— -te -- 't \ottlilivigk- . meow . , ..,, 4,' �'I `f}}}F -1 1i ,- � g ,!� �. • '';.i� ■is r .' •. r..v.4.;frI ./if'- I ...1. $11141-- 04-. �... (iRt.i.‘ • • : �1�d�1 .... 1 ,J`.• ra�sl • f .,...,,,,,, . --..-411-&tisi,q,-...,. ,.....--- . .. ‘,.. , I , , .,._ ,ii �t , Ir \-.1 Tk......,../, lip . . ;Bmi:. --_Itopti-_,,ft4-0,-000-41,-„•.-..--tiL .,,,.. ii-ar , ,411,71. .\ n -,,,,E,...i.d' ; I. , i ono:. ..• ----,1 _,-01,„„or_..1.1..._...L.1..4.6.,:.,,..;. ._ ._ _„.,,.. , i . . lit . api,,,cifel-,20).„,",_- -rm.ft-.1.••,....ai*J-- • :r ii .41-,‘;--:_____,,______/-3:24* .• •r%4111111111111- '' . ,__4----, /..------ ,....6*.:1,, ' (h'. ill• KL.1 II -.41Plr r' / ~ ` , . If t.. - .y ?ark 1 ii • -•--.:—.-...- P- ---._,----,,,. 0*14.4414- 1 .•--..._ ....• - i • . •••... ' • gill ' .. ...-.''''. -.7.:: 7-7 .:.....,:-/...?.',7- --•••• -.-L.-27.:-----,,,,,,•._44; *o.i.,, ,/to 7 Ce•A.,2"..•,1'1,1.'4 IS•11 I 7 "Plw 7.(clill.14'.' ' -7, •• ,: •••%!•$��' rpI LROA.7 •\' � . '•-.i 1`„••i�. P /�/• �1. •`�:�°4`k'+ ` , �•7 ------ _3q4 'I fit. �-;y .:. Protect Area if a �, ►f I�y! .l. ;.%I “,:l.; ----4::::.-4:::::-''."---; ri ii../.." . -..,, - ,c•• .. ,..,- iii p, _____11....... • • ,Ph`_ Sbabadid Site ,2.!• '' .. :,: ; `� j .,r ?lid -•..•' I`-I.� e4 ��s�/ "lit. ''''' -.....''a.,13• —• — 1 il 1---Ei-'7--1-i—iffi-- --,-. 4....7,... L'''s - m, ,11 i l';`.‘1.1 It'''I:. '" :S P I.1.. ® • ' ' '� ,1.. lt i \JIt I :r . _— •. • _ riosal. -1 :7 A.- ' ti ,' fn' , % \. ScI \ ' (��▪ f a ' • '" . Q.fir J M 16 .i 4 ....• I.!: .: . :its 1.4. ' \-;• .. .-.....k'.}-• ,. 1T,,t!'' 1. M tLorgacrei. 1-'3 &' 4'1L i - 1 1 I}1`. ' • t .1:" '''�`• y. , one ,'1_ .1 iz - • • Base Map USGS Renton,Washington 0 1000 2000 • 7.5'Quadrangle, 1973 Feet N Figure 1. Project location. • • j Trench 2E : ' / Stratum 2.1 k % Trench 1D Feature 2 ;` \ rench 2D • % Feature 1 `� T j • \ n \ i -- /�. ,. , Stratum 2.2 0 '\ •Y Trench 1 " ? # •� / Trench 2 Midden F /� ` ♦• , \ `'' // 1>i)zz,_., � TrenchlEvTrench 1C Trench 2C \ % , ♦J Building B \____:\:.:_ / , uilding A i Trench 2B Midden G \ Trench 1B .\\ / Trench 1A , / Trench 2A ` /..�u�..�u�..�u�..�..�.. • Cultural Deposits " ., `•'; • )) Oak Tree Trench • ",-''_.! 0 50 Middens F and G were identified by Chatters (1981) I I I Strata 2.1 and 2.2 by Larson Anthropological/Archaeological Services, Seattle(1996). . N Feet Figure 2. Ozbolt property showing the location for the proposed Schneider Homes development, LAAS.trenches, and identified cultural deposits. parking areas were determined prior to archaeological assessment and a plan map of the project area was produced by architect Roger Newell. Exact locations of utilities such as sewer lines and water pipelines have not been finalized. ENVIRONMENT Environment of the Black River drainage has been reviewed in four cultural resources reports (Chatters 1981, 1988; Larson 1988; Lewarch et al. 1996; Reid 1991). The project area is at the south end of the Skyway Upland, which includes exposures of the Renton Formation, a fine-grained to medium-grained sandstone with small amounts of siltstone, shale, and coal (Galster and Laprade 1991:249; Plate 1). Locally, the hillside above the Black River floodplain is known as Earlington Hill (Larson 1988:4). Former channels of the Black River curved around the base of the hill and turned west to a confluence with the Green River. During the historic period from ca. AD 1850, the Black River channel was on the east edge of the project area in what is now Hardie Avenue S.W. Earlier Black River channels cut through the project area as indicated by sand and gravel bars exposed in archaeological excavations and construction trenches (Chatters 1981; Larson 1988). The Black River channel probably migrated from north to south through time in the project vicinity, moving south from sandstone bedrock at the base of Earlington Hill to more readily eroded alluvium in the Black River/Cedar River floodplain. If this is the case, buried cultural deposits in the project area may be older than cultural materials excavated by Chatters (1981) in the property directly south because Black River channels at the base of Earlington Hill should be older than channels farther south. • Contemporary project area topography includes a gently sloping hillside in the northern third of the property, a level area in the middle of the property, another gentle slope, and a level area on the southern edge of the property which was the historic Black River floodplain. The east edge of the Ozbolt property includes a steep bluff on the north and a drainage ditch adjacent to Hardie Avenue S.W. Lynn Larson (1988:10) noted a remnant river terrace at the northwest corner of the property during her 1988 survey of the area. Since that time, the northwest and central portions Of the project area were graded by BOAS, Incorporated, to remove overburden during a cultural resources assessment project in 1990 (Svado Ozbolt, personal communication 1996). Natural contours of the hillside were also modified by property owners over the years when they scraped matrix from the steeper hill slopes and filled low-lying floodplain areas on the south edge of the property (Svado Ozbolt, personal communication 1996). The area was also plowed and repeatedly disked (Svado Ozbolt, personal communication 1996), which probably changed the natural surface contours. Ground surfaces in the middle and northern portion of the project area would have been above most Black River floods, events which occurred seasonally during flood stages of the Green River and times when Lake Washington had high water levels (Mullineaux 1970).. Lower elevation surfaces on the southern edge of the property could have been used by hunter-fisher-gatherers during the drier times of the year. The Black River floodplain was an especially productive environmental zone for hunter-fisher- gatherers, with four species of salmon passing through the Black River channel. A wide 4 variety of plant and terrestrial mammal resources was also available on the floodplain and - from nearby hillsides. CULTURAL BACKGROUND Ethnography, history, and archaeology of the project area have been reviewed in several cultural resources reports (Chatters 1981, 1988; Larson 1988; Lewarch et al. 1996; Reid 1991; Welch and Moura 1991). We review the most salient points as they relate to the Ozbolt property. PREVIOUS CULTURAL RESOURCE STUDIES Four cultural resource investigations were conducted in the project area vicinity, including an assessment of the entire Ozbolt property (Larson 1988), surface grading in the central and north portion of the property (Stump 1990), limited backhoe trenching in the southeast corner of the property (Chatters 1981), and construction monitoring south of the property line (Reid 1991). The project area includes cultural deposits which are part of the Sbabadid Site (45K151), an archaeological site with at least three house structures or temporary shelters and associated midden deposits dating between AD 1790 and AD 1865 (Chatters 1981; Reid 1991). Lynn Larson (1988) noted that not all cultural deposits within the Sbabadid Site may . date to the 1800s, with the possibility of both earlier and later occupations. The Sbabadid Site is probably eligible for listing on the NRHP because of the site's potential to contribute • information important to regional prehistory. The site also has heritage value for the Muckleshoot Tribe and Duwamish Tribal Organization. The Sbabadid Site was first recorded in 1979, with subsequent testing and data recovery excavation in 1979 and 1980 by archaeologists from the Office of Public Archaeology, University of Washington (Chatters 1981). 'Auger coring, shovel testing, and backhoe trenching were used to identify,six midden areas, including two middens within the southern portion of the Ozbolt property which were designated Area F and Area G (Chatters 1981:Figure 6) (Figure 2). Area G was bisected by the property line, with the north half in the Ozbolt property, and Area F was approximately 80 feet north of the property line. Cultural midden deposits in Area G were identified by cultural material in shovel tests and a backhoe trench, while midden in Area F was exposed in a single backhoe trench. No detailed descriptions of midden deposits are given for Areas F and G (Chatters 1981:33), but a generic description is presented for.most of the midden deposits at the site. Cultural deposits were identified at depths between .5 and one meter below the ground surface. The basal stratigraphic unit throughout the area was comprised of coarse sands and gravel deposits which were part of an old river bar. The lowermost cultural material, designated CL2, was on, and interbedded with sand and gravel and included burned matrix, charcoal stained gravel, and: fragments of bone. Flood deposits of sterile sand and/or sand and silt overlaid CL1, and Chatters (1981:33) suggested that the matrix was deposited during a single flood event. The next evidence of hunter-fisher-gatherer.occupation was a cultural stratum laid directly on the flood deposits and designated as CL2. CL2 had ash hearths, burned earth, burned fish bone, 5 charcoal flecks, plant material, and lenses of pebbles which where placed by site inhabitants (Chatters 1981:33). Stratum CL2 was not continuous throughout the entire site area but formed localized concentrations, such as those identified in Areas F and G. Most of the investigations at the Sbabadid Site in 1979 and 1980 focused on excavation of two structures south of the Ozbolt property. A structure in Area A, designated as Area A-North, was approximately 80 feet south of Area G, on the Ozbolt property. The structure was interpreted as a small, single family dwelling, measuring 8 x 10 meters, based on a block excavation program (Chatters 1981:97). A second small structure in Area A-South measured 10 x 13 meters and was also interpreted by Chatters (1981) as a small, single family dwelling based on data from an intensive coring program. Area A was occupied between AD 1841 and AD 1865 based on archival information and age ranges of bead types and flat glass (Chatters 1981:114). A longhouse in Area D, southwest of Area A, had dimensions of 8 x 24 meters and was occupied between AD 1790 and AD 1845 on the basis of bead types, thickness of flat glass, and the presence of horse bones in the cultural deposits (Chatters 1981:115). Chatters also monitored excavation of utility trenches in 1981 after the data recovery excavations were complete (Larson 1988). • The next cultural resource investigations in the project area were conducted by Lynn Larson in October 1988 as part of an archival research and field reconnaissance program of the Ozbolt . • property for a proposed storage warehouse project (Larson 1988). Pedestrian transects spaced at intervals not more than 10 meters apart were used to inspect the property. Seven shovel probes were excavated to a depth of 110 centimeters to penetrate the alluvium and fill material in the vicinity of Areas F and G defined previously by Chatters (Larson 1988:10). Larson (1988) noted problems in locating the midden areas because the published map (Chatters 1981:Figure 6) did not have a scale. Larson (1988:12) contacted Chatters to clarify the location of Areas F and G and plotted the position of the two midden areas on a detailed project map (Larson 1988:Figure 4). No cultural deposits were identified in any of the shovel tests, but Larson noted a dirt or gravel borrow on the southern boundary of the property and identified a gravel bar in the vicinity of Area F one meter below the ground surface (Larson 1988:12). The stratigraphy in the area suggested the same kind of alluvial depositional history in the Ozbolt property as described by Chatters for the property to the south. Larson (1988) also pointed out that Chatters assumed all cultural deposits in the Sbabadid Site had the same age and represented the same kinds of activities even though most areas were not excavated and no dates were obtained for most of the midden deposits. She (Larson 1988) suggested the possibility of different ages.and activities represented in areas outside the excavated structures and indicated deposits in Areas F and G had information important for prehistory, history, and cultural heritage values to members of the Duwamish Tribal Organization (Larson 1988:13). Larson (1988:13-14) made a number of recommendations for future archaeological work on the Ozbolt property, including revising construction plans to avoid known cultural deposits, limited archaeological testing to identify and evaluate Areas F and G if avoidance was not possible, an expanded literature and archival search to more completely document Duwamish • families who may have lived in the area, and a test excavation and trenching program to determine if cultural deposits were present between Areas F and G. 6 Two cultural resource projects were conducted in the project area and_vicinity in 1990, including construction monitoring.of the Sbabadid Site during excavations for the Earlington Woods Development Project. (Reid 1991) and a cultural resource assessment of the central and northern portions of the Ozbolt property (Stump 1990). Alfred Reid (1991) monitored construction excavation in the Sbabadid Site area when apartment units were constructed in 1990. Reid (1991) identified seven additional midden areas, including three in areas which were graded prior to archaeological monitoring and four in construction trenches. Trenches for utilities such as sewer lines, storm drainage pipes, and water lines were excavated to depths ranging from four to 10 feet below ground surface. All cultural materials identified by Reid (1991:22) were directly on coarse sands and gravels which formed the basal stratigraphic unit defined by Chatters (1981). Seven feature designations were given to midden deposits, individual hearths, or combinations of hearths midden and postmolds (Reid 1991:22); most were in the vicinity.of Area A as defined by Chatters (1981). No cultural deposits were identified in backhoe trenches in a line near the north property line, approximately 20 meters south of the Ozbolt property, or in a short backhoe trench adjacent to the southeast corner of the Ozbolt property line. Reid (1991:22) recorded two areas with midden. deposits outside of structures, a midden deposit within a structure which had five hearths, a midden deposit within a structure with three postmolds and a hearth, an isolated fire hearth, and two areas with sheet midden outside of structures. Feature 90-2 was the northernmost cultural deposit identified in 1990 and was approximately 15 meters south of the Ozbolt property line (Reid 1991:Map E). The feature included organic and charcoal staining, highly fragmented bone and shell, and fire . modified rock (FMR) (Reid 1991:24). A thin cultural layer was also identified below Feature 90-2 and had a diameter.of approximately one meter. Reid (1991:24) suggested that the Feature 90-2 cultural deposits were part of a structure identified by Chatters (1981) in Area A- . North, at the northwest corner of the house or directly outside. During the 1990 construction, features exposed in surface scraping were preserved in place and some building and pipeline alignments were changed to avoid known resources (Reid 1991:35). Filter fabric or plastic covered the features and clean fill was placed on top. Some features are under contemporary parking lots while others are under lawns in landscaped areas. Reid (1991:37) suggested that all features were similar to those identified previously by Chatters (1981), although no analysis of any feature contents was conducted. The 1990 investigations expanded the areal extent of a structure in Area A-North, the size of the midden in Area A-South was increased to the west, and an additional structure was identified in Area A-South. . In 1990, BOAS, Incorporated, conducted a cultural resource assessment of the Ozbolt property, but did not produce a formal report of the research. However, the BOAS, Incorporated, investigations can be reconstructed to some degree with information in a letter written by Sheila Stump (1990) to the Gregory Development Company and from recollections of Svado Ozbolt (personal communication 1996), the property owner. Mr. Ozbolt states that BOAS, Incorporated, excavated a series of auger probes in the southern portion of the property, graded the upper portion of the property to remove overburden, and excavated a • backhoe trench from the floodplain north to a large oak tree (Figure 2) in the center of the property. Stump (1990:1) indicated that the BOAS, Incorporated, testing effort through 7 • December 1990 "involved only the blading of the upper portion of the property." BOAS,_ Incorporated, archaeologists found a fragment of a human bone in the vicinity of the large oak tree in the center of the property and trade beads, buttons, twisted cedar thread attached to buttons and beads, a fragment of cloth, fragments of woven cedar bark, and small pieces of cedar wood (Stump 1990:1). A date of the middle 1800s was estimated for the buttons. All cultural material was recovered from the plow zone and Stump (1990:2) suggested that "a good case can be made that the remains already had been disturbed by years of plowing." The artifactual material is consistent with tree burials and the oak tree may have been used as a burial platform (Stump 1990:1). Stump (1990:1) also suggested the possibility of additional human remains or artifacts on sloping hillsides south of the oak tree which may have moved downslope after falling from the tree or which were buried intentionally within the hillside. Stump (1990:1) recommended that the oak tree be preserved in place during construction excavation and that heavy construction equipment be kept out of the area around the tree. Stump (1990:1) also recommended that if the tree had to be removed, the trunk should be cut to ground level, the area filled, and the ground landscaped without undertaking any subsurface ground disturbance. Further archaeological testing of the southern portion of the property was also suggested to ensure that human remains were not present and to identify possible archaeological deposits associated with the Sbabadid Site (Stump 1990:2). Based on previous archaeological investigations in the project area and vicinity, we would expect four kinds of cultural deposits within the Ozbolt property, including stratified midden deposits with hearths and postmolds which were part of house or temporary camp structures, thin midden deposits with hearths which were in areas outside of structures, isolated pit features, and evidence of burials. ETHNOGRAPHY/ETHNOHISTORY The Black River drainage was one of the most important areas for settlement within the territory of the Duwamish people; it could be considered the "heartland" of the Duwamish. Larson (1988:4-7) described the'complex social networks, marriage alliances, land use practices, and settlement pattern of Duwamish people in the Duwamish River Valley, Black River drainage, and along Elliott Bay. The Ozbolt property includes the northern portions of Sbabadid, which was the largest Duwamish village on the Black River (Larson 1988:5): Sbabadid and nearby villages controlled access and flow of goods and people between Elliott Bay and upriver settlements in the Cedar River, Green River, and Sammamish River drainages. People of Sbabadid wielded considerable political power and regional influence. Larson (1988:6) noted that families of historic Duwamish leaders probably lived at Sbabadid. Chatters (1981) suggested that the small structures he identified archaeologically at Sbabadid represented single family dwellings and that the Duwamish culture had changed by AD 1855. An alternative explanation for the size of the structures is that they represented small, temporary structures associated with seasonal fishing camps. Whatever the interpretation, Sbabadid is an important site for people of Duwamish ancestry because historic data on 8 individual Duwamish families can be linked to the contemporary location. Archaeological • resources at the Sbabadid Site provide a strong cultural link between historic Duwamish people and their contemporary descendants. HISTORY The project area has a long history of Euroamerican land use (Larson 1988:7-8). The Black River floodplain and base of Earlington Hill was a dairy from 1895 to 1913. The Earlington Golf and Country Club purchased the property after 1913 and the project area became part of a golf course. The golf course sold the land to Robert Pratt, who built a house directly north of the project area in 1946. The project area was cultivated and low elevation ground on the south edge was filled. Flowers were grown in the project area to supply the Pratt family florist business. Lucy Pratt Ozbolt, Robert Pratt's daughter, and her husband Svado Ozbolt now own the property. Mr. Ozbolt (personal communication 1996) described grading and leveling operations which cut the crown of the hill and placed material on the lower elevation floodplain deposits of the former Black River. Mr. Ozbolt also plowed and disked the area to grow hay so horses could graze in the field. • FIELD METHODOLOGY The areas tested for the Schneider Homes Renton Apartments project correspond to the proposed locations of Buildings A and B in Figure 2. Trench 1, excavated west to east along the northern edge of Building A (Figure 2), was approximately 170 feet long and between four and six feet deep. Trench 2 was excavated east to west along the northern edge of Building B (Figure 2) and was approximately 170 feet long and about six feet deep. Four secondary trenches were excavated perpendicular to the main trenches for each building (Figure 2) at approximately 50 foot intervals. Two additional trenches were excavated, one between Trenches 1C and 1D parallel to Trench 1, and another perpendicular to Trench 2 extending north (Figure 2). Trench 1 E was excavated between Trenches 1C and 1D to examine an area where a possible tree burial was reported to have been encountered in a previous cultural resource assessment (Stump 1990). Trench 2E was excavated north of Trench 2 to determine the extent of Stratum 2.2 (Figure 2), a cultural deposit. The trenches were excavated between July 2 and 3 and on July 8, 1996 by Randy Hyland of Pat Josties Excavating, using a John Deere 410D backhoe with a two foot bucket. Excavation of backhoe trenches was directed and monitored by Eric Bangs of LAAS who monitored from within the trench to closely examine potential cultural resources. Monitoring notes and photographs are on file with LAAS. 9 r • ASSESSMENT RESULTS TRENCH 1 Trench 1; excavated along the proposed northern edge of Building A, was 170 feet long and. about seven feet deep at the western end and five feet deep at the eastern end. About 2.5 feet of fill covered native soils along the length of the trench. Native soils in the western end of the trench consisted of about five feet of light brown to pale yellow sandy silt strata with less than 10 percent gravel-sized inclusions. These deposits match descriptions of glacial till, formations that were deposited in the Puget.Sound area during the Pleistocene (Galster and Laprade 1991) and are similar to glacial deposits observed at the King County Water Pollution Control's East Division Reclamation Plant at Renton about one mile west of the Ozbolt property (Bangs and Larson 1996). A stratum of consolidated white sand and large pieces of decomposing sandstone bedrock was below the glacial deposits. The bedrock sloped up north and east at about 15 degrees until it reached the center of Trench 1 where the bedrock sloped down at about 10 degrees in the • eastern part of the trench. Approximately three feet of alluvium covered the decomposing sandstone bedrock in the center of the trench and about five feet at the eastern end. Some small pieces of charcoal were noted within the alluvium at a depth of about four feet below surface but appeared to derive from root burning. No cultural deposits were observed in • Trench 1. • TRENCH 1A Trench 1A, located at the western end of Trench 1 (Figure 2) was 50 feet long and approximately five feet deep. Intact alluvial deposits were encountered below about two feet of fill. The alluvial deposits consisted of pale yellow to light brown fine sand strata interfmgered with yellowish brown silty sand deposits with orange staining. The consolidated white sand stratum and decomposing sandstone observed in Trench 1 was not noted. No cultural deposits were observed in Trench 1A. TRENCH 1B Trench 1B was located 50 feet east of Trench lA (Figure 2). Native soil in this trench consisted of alternating lenses of yellowish brown fine sand and grey clayey silt,both deposited in an alluvial environment. The grain size increased at the southern end of the trench indicating a relatively higher energy alluvial environment was in this area. No cultural deposits were observed in Trench 1B. TRENCH 1C • Trench 1C, located 50 feet west of Trench 1D was five feet deep and about 55 feet long • (Figure 2). Only two feet of alluvium was noted in this area, below a foot of fill, with the lower three feet consisting of pockets of white compact sand and pieces of decomposing 10 sandstone mixed with alluvium. The alluvial deposits included alternating lenses of yellowish brown silty sand with orange staining and pale yellow silt. A possible pit feature (Feature 1) was documented in the west wall about 25 feet from the north end of the trench. Feature 1 was 27.5 inches long and 10 inches deep. It was covered by about four inches of a light brown fine sand alluvial stratum and about one foot of fill. The pit contained two cultural strata: a black silty sand with flecks of crushed shell or burned bone below a lense of red-stained burned sand (Figure 3), however, no mammal or fish bone or any other culturally modified objects were noted other than a single fire modified rock impressed into the trench wall. The black silty sand stratum, and the small amount of organic material contained within the stratum, appears to have been burned in situ. Feature 1 was excavated into an alluvial deposit mixed with consolidated white sand strata. • Feature 1 does not appear to be a refuse pit, because of the in situ burning, but the feature similar to a type of pit feature identified by Chatters (1981:94) at the Sbabadid Site located "in and around the house, none of which contained anything but midden and detritus (bone, fire cracked rock)." Chatters (1981:94) also describes a clay lined pit that had similar dimensions as Feature 1 and contained only midden which he interprets as a storage pit: However, Feature 1 is associated with neither a midden stratum nor post molds or any other indication that a structure was nearby. Feature 1 was excavated into compacted sand and not lined with clay but it may have served as a type of storage pit. • TRENCH 1D Trench 1D was located at the northeast corner of Building A and extended southwest about 50 feet (Figure 2). The stratigraphy in this area was similar to that noted in Trench 1C with shallow alluvial deposits resting above mixed consolidated white sand deposits and decomposing sandstone bedrock. No cultural deposits were observed. TRENCH 1E • Trench 1E was excavated between.Trenches 1C and 1D, perpendicular to their southern ends (Figure 2), and was approximately five to six feet deep. Native soils consisted of lenses of alluvially-deposited pale yellow silty sand alternating with yellowish brown fine sand. At the . base of the trench, below the alluvial strata, was a grey clay stratum probably deposited in a low energy backwater environment. This grey clay is probably the same stratum noted by Lewarch (1994) at the Fred Meyer/Renton Shopping Center Site just east of the Ozbolt property. . . This trench was excavated to examine an area about 20 feet south of an old oak tree where cultural materials and human remains in the plow zone were reported in a previous cultural resource study (Stump 1990) however, no cultural deposits, or materials, or human remains were observed in Trench 1E. • 11 • Trench 1C, West Wall Feature 1 South North tai<d� �' t,I`'Y,S. ,�s3""�3;r'xy- y g. :� ;,,.4,-k" ` ':.` ti,,. ., :, ice'. ay,-....,„, •:,^aFi?'i, .., .aY'1,, 3-'n ��;z, V: .:s. i i-f(4ti4Y',`--":`�t{ ✓„,•x: .;-k.,.,i-A._ F'YV--°'-ky(-ck. t .i� ,, w -, -,1, ;.. .. •s'' 'ts w.. J)�, "4-,n .��7�'.0...,%.+im se,s:7`s• . _'e'e' :L.'.."..0:{{�`v"t�- Y-t:'i'-, Y..,lT."R.7t'si �f:h.'.i�S�Y �.yy��a/ i..� Ij �};}�,���� +�iy� IT'. '.1 t.� :•`Il:-. , ♦L^':11 5,w.h .N''. y ...- n'!',-.`. t 'W' ; °4,= :=: :* �c ,'„k, i J ., :A. I'". 'i , L f'er a •.a v`f,'n f<.c ',�.;...:;;=a;+?".`r:.e.�' p,s R'b"'• k..Y v''+:. - .. i ' ''w ,�a .. •-G n �:a-s ::_ : : ,, . -4, ,, ,j; r R i.e.Fill°_ ., ;� t ;r -3:;s: -v.�„.. fG;,,,:t c:Wit,•".` ,fig' .-�9? Z t ,e r. a �' id, i^ ,� `yT i iy' `�'.`34".',riilk.tom`-9: r.;��.�1,:c,'Te 4'�3{ryY�z'l��4'€1. �• ''x��.y�iLrs ti�..�`�2". �'.- y, � �e''a�' b,� �-Y,✓; ,1•1 {. mot; ,-; ..',44� 'fir," a 0 F� �. 4.: ^ .< . f`:,r, " ' t but , , ,,� ,,, ;j :.{:�cCi.- • Q�,s�''�4j•,-%r�3: 0�C•.1 •y.SKt'V:1n�x�i"', � •=`>�. t. z. w. � `$e �, - - • t z, su"i ,�t. '..:,ral;..=;tic - .r ' _ , - :: • C ' fIn _/ /t...' . B y, d 'S ,�rr y / 3� 1 �.._"'-.: • •.mow=-`L� f `, • `:��} t S C C � P �1 t 'k`��y , , ram • •• • iii :tit x a k ;°Allp/i/Amisimm..... ___,,,,,,,,,, ,...,-tilivi....-,3,-,:-.. -:.-.1- i,,. .ri,..,14",e_., 04)1,e.,,...•'-.,-,,,0, 1: ,"1 1. :M1, µ2 f i,ey� .3 - t�y .>�ax: . ._-, t:,1X a - • • •1 .SLuy � . :5 r• .r-- .. , •• . y Burned Sand Feature 1 A-Light brown fine sand B-Pale yellow to light yellowish brown silty sand with orange mottling Fire Modified Rock C-White to light grey compacted fine sand 0 1 I i I D-Yellowish brown fine sand with orange mottling E-Pale yellowish brown silty sand Meter • Figure 3. Trench 1C, West Wall. • TRENCH 2 Trench 2 was excavated along the north edge of proposed Building B (Figure 2). About 3.5 feet of fill above intact light brown silty sand strata interfingered with grey silt lenses deposited by multiple flood events were in this area. The same thick, grey clay stratum noted in Trench lE and at the Fred Meyer/Renton Shopping Center Site (Lewarch 1994) was observed at the base of the trench. Five foot thick gravel and coarse sand strata were observed in the western end of the trench and may be gravel bar deposits similar to those noted by Chatters (1981) at the Sbabadid Site. Two intact cultural deposits were observed within Trench 2, Strata 2.1 and 2.2. Stratum 2.1 was a four to six-inch thick, black silty sand deposit approximately 20 feet long located about six feet from the eastern end of Trench 2 (Figure 2). Stratum 2.1 was encountered about five feet below the surface resting within light brown silt and clayey silt deposits unlike midden deposits excavated by Chatters (1981) and Reid (1991) which rested primarily on gravel deposits. The contents of Stratum 2.1 were very sparse and consisted of less than 10 percent finely crushed shell and highly fragmented burned bone. No other culturally modified objects were observed in Stratum 2.1 except for nine pieces of fire modified rock in Trench 2E, Feature 2. Trench 2E was excavated to determine the boundaries of the cultural deposit, Stratum 2.1. Stratum 2.2 was four to six inches thick and consisted of two distinct superimposed cultural lenses about nine feet long covered by five feet of alluvium and fill, 90 feet from the,eastern end of Trench 2. The lower stratum was a three-inch thick black clayey silt lens with 10 percent crushed shell. The upper stratum was a discontinuous reddish-orange silty sand lense with 10 to 20 percent crushed shell that appeared at the western and eastern ends of the black stratum. Neither fish nor mammal bone was observed in Stratum 2.2. Stratum 2.1 and 2.2 are similar in content, to "exterior" midden strata identified by Chatters (1981) at the Sbabadid Site although they are about two feet deeper and thus may be older. "Exterior" midden strata at the Sbabadid Site existed outside of the house structures and are characterized by lenses of burned bone and ash separated by alluvially deposited olive grey silts (Chatters 1981:Figure 23). However, since no post molds or other evidence of structures were observed in the LAAS trenches, Strata 2.1 and 2.2 are not assumed to be refuse deposits piled near the exterior of a house. Rather, they probably derive from food processing and/or disposal of food remains. All of the midden strata identified within the Ozbolt property, Strata 2.1 and 2.2, and Areas F and G, appear to rest on the same terrace along the bank of the Black River channel. TRENCH 2A Trench 2A was approximately 50 feet long and five feet deep. Intact alluvial deposits in Trench 2A consisted of a two foot thick gravel stratum superimposed over a grey coarse sand stratum. No cultural deposits were identified in this area. 13 • TRENCH 2B • Approximately two feet of fill covered intact alluvial deposits in this area. Yellowish light brown silty sand strata with orange mottling were present in the northern quarter of the trench. Grain size became increasingly coarse toward the southern end of the trench indicating a higher energy alluvial environment closer to the old Black River channel. No cultural deposits were observed in Trench 2B. TRENCH 2C Intact alluvial deposits in Trench 2C were similar to those noted in Trench 2B. Yellowish light brown silty sand with mottling in the north end of the trench graded to light brown fine to medium sand in the south end. No cultural materials were observed in this area. TRENCH 2D Trench 2D was excavated south from the northeast corner of Building B (Figure 2). Approximately 2.5 feet of fill lay above grey coarse sand strata with 10 percent rounded gravel-sized inclusions which probably represent gravel bar deposits. Disturbed deposits are expected to be deep in this area and further east on the Ozbolt property because of the flower nursery that was operated here and the subsequent tilling by the landowners (Svado Ozbolt, personal communication 1996). No cultural deposits were observed in Trench 2D. TRENCH 2E Trench 2E was excavated north from Trench 2 to determine the extent of Stratum 2.1. The trench was about 50 feet long and between four and 6.5 feet deep. Stratum 2.1 extended along the length of the trench about 48 feet and started to slope up approximately 15 feet from the south end of Trench 2E mirroring the lay of the topography (Figure 4). At the northern end of the trench was a discrete cluster of nine or 10 fire modified rocks (Feature 2). Field observation of the rocks indicated that they were probably burned in situ and probably represent an intact fire hearth and/.or cooking feature. The contents of Stratum 2.1 in the vicinity of Feature 2 did not differ greatly from previous observations in Trench 2 except for a higher percentage of black organic matter, evidenced by a "greasy" texture. The presence of Feature 2 reinforces the hypothesis that Stratum 2.1 derived from food processing. No other cultural materials were noted such as mammal and fish bone or modified tools. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Cultural deposits which are part of the Sbabadid Site (45KI51) were identified by LAAS in the central and east portions of the project area. The Sbabadid Site is probably eligible for listing on the NRHP. Previous investigations on the Ozbolt property by.BOAS, Incorporated, in 1990 identified a human bone and possibly associated grave goods near a large oak tree in the . center of the property. The potential for human remains near the oak tree is a concern of the Muckleshoot Tribe and the Duwamish Tribal Organization. LAAS archaeologist Eric Bangs 14 • • Trench 2E • - West Wall • • South • North • Fill :._:.:.. .- • it •-.:w a,•• s .r .. . . • --- vt' s ? .1 i• Ft.7.J.i:: f,; mil:;W1 4 ;Ra:- . a-t'" :; t:,: f,,, ;.� ��.'';:;r;:• ';: Stratum 2.1 `:• r.,: :•4 %}s,: •t, _•„-::44'fi-''', :r. ,•4. _,:': Feature 2 `1 • * u : ..s 'y n...g . :sue' /J • m m Fire Modified Rock Stratum 2.1 Burned Sand with Crushed Shell • ' A-Yellowish light brown fine sand 0 1 f • I J I B-Yellowish light brown silty sand with orange mottling Meter • • C-Light brown fine sand with orange mottling D-Grey sand - . E-Yellowish light brown sandy silt with orange mauling ' • F-Light brown silty sand• • • Figure 4. Trench 2E, West Wall. • r found no evidence of burials or isolated human remains in backhoe trenches or on exposed contemporary ground surfaces near the oak tree. An isolated pit feature, a midden deposit, and a midden deposit with a hearth feature were identified in backhoe trenches. These cultural deposits are probably part of the Sbabadid Site based on location, stratigraphic position, and cultural contents. Two midden deposits within the Sbabadid Site, Area F and Area G, are also within the southeastern portion of the Schneider Homes Renton Apartments Project area (Chatters 1981:Figure 6; Larson 1988:Figure 4). The following recommendations are offered by cultural resource area: . 1. Feature 1. Feature 1 is within Trench 1C of the proposed foundation of Building A and would be removed during construction excavation (Figure 2). Archaeological testing and/or construction monitoring is not recommended for this feature. The lack of cultural material within Feature 1 suggests that analysis of the feature's contents would not add to the knowledge of the Sbabadid Site or its inhabitants, thus would not provide information important to prehistory. 2. Oak Tree and Vicinity. The oak tree is within the proposed foundation excavation for Building A and would need to be removed as part of construction(Figure 2). The area around the tree, where a fragment of human bone and possible grave goods were recovered by BOAS, Incorporated, would be removed during construction excavation. No artifacts or human . • remains were observed in the area in the LAAS investigation, but the possibility exists that undiscovered cultural materials may be in the area. Because the potential for human remains near the oak tree is a concern for the Muckleshoot Tribe, we recommend a conservative treatment for this area. Removal of the oak tree and construction excavation in the vicinity of the oak tree by a professional archaeologist and a tribal monitor is recommended (Figure 5). If human remains are identified during construction excavation, construction would stop and the Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, the Muckleshoot Tribe, and the Duwamish Tribal Organization would be consulted regarding an appropriate course of action. • 3. Stratum 2.1 and Feature 2. Most of the midden deposits are north of Building B, in an area proposed for parking (Figure 2). These cultural deposits may be older than archaeological deposits currently documented for the Sbabadid Site and may provide information important to prehistory. Since most deposits are over one meter below ground surface they should not be directly affected by construction excavation and every precaution should be taken to avoid disturbing them. If construction excavation is planned in the area to depths greater than 75 centimeters below ground surface, redesign of the construction should be implemented. If the midden deposits cannot be avoided, a testing program would be necessary in the potential impact area to determine significance of the midden dosits through- the evaluation of age and composition of the inidden and to determine if-Mitional'features are present (Figure 5). If the deposits are significant, a data recovery program would be required to mitigate the deposits. Consultation with the Washington State Office of Archaeology and . 16 oho, • Stratum 2.1 / • \ \ ‘4.‘ , ‘ k • T �den'F . its ,fr / ..„....,,..,_.; : a, A .zi ri, : g:f;-,,,;:,,,I. ,,,v,..4..,.: v.),11,* i ♦� 1414 4 1,4*** ,/ O Building A Building B .-° . Midden G � • / , v ,, i .!.1,9 Oak Tree ip Areas to be evaluated for significance if `;' subsurface disturbance is unavoidable /. • 0 50 /� '�. Area to be monitored if subsurface N I Feet `.._. , Monitoring required , disturbance is unavoidable Figure 5. Monitoring recommendations for the proposed Schneider Homes Renton Apartments Project on the Ozbolt Property. • Historic Preservation, the Muckleshoot Tribe, and the Duwamish Tribal Organization would - be required during formulation of the testing plan and development of a data recovery program. 4. Stratum 2.2. These midden deposits are on the north edge of Building B and may extend farther south into the central portion of the Building B foundation (Figure 2). However, since the Stratum 2.2 midden deposits are not stratified and are not contiguous in profile, they appear to yield little new information to that already gathered by Chatters (1981) and Reid (1991). Archaeological testing and/or construction monitoring is not recommended for this feature. 5. Areas F and G. Areas F and G, identified previously by Chatters (1981), are on the edge of proposed parking areas (Figure 2). Areas F and G are part of the Sbabadid Site and are probably eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. The midden deposits should not be adversely affected by construction since they are over 50 centimeters below ground surface. If subsurface construction excavation is planned in Areas F and G and if the excavation will extend to depths greater than 25 centimeters below the ground surface, avoidance through redesign should be implemented. If avoidance is not possible, archaeological testing would be required to determine significance through the evaluation of age and composition of the midden and to determine if additional features are present. • 6. East Edge of the Ozbolt Property. The east edge of the property adjacent to the historic channel of the Black River has a high probability for buried cultural deposits (Larson 1988) (Figure 2). If construction excavation is planned at depths below 25 centimeters from the ground surface on the east edge of the property adjacent to Hardie Avenue S.W., the excavations should be monitored by a professional archaeologist. If cultural deposits are identified, a testing program may be carried out to evaluate significance. If the deposits are significant, a data recovery program would be required to mitigate the deposits. • • • 18 • Please call if you have any questions regarding this assessment. Sincerely, �... ,., — Dennis E. Lewarch Senior Archaeologist • 14/ Eric W. Bangs Field Archaeologist Lynn L. Larson Principal Investigator • • cc: Dr. Robert G. Whitlam, State Archaeologist, Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation Walter Pacheco, Community Services Director, Muckleshoot Tribe Jennifer Toth Henning, Planner, City of Renton Planning Department 19 (. • • BIBLIOGRAPHY Bangs, Eric W. and Lynn L. Larson 1996 Cultural Resource Monitoring of the Waterworks Project at King County's East Division Reclamation Plant, Renton, Washington. Letter report from Larson Anthropological/Archaeological Services, Seattle, to Bruce Ball, Black and Veatch Waste Science, Incorporated, 27 March. Chatters, James C. 1981 Archaeology of the Sbabadid Site, 45KI51, King County, Washington. Office of Public Archaeology, University of Washington, Seattle. On file at Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia. 1988 Tualdad Altu: A Fourth Century Village on the Black River, King County, Washington. Submitted to First City Equities, Seattle. On file at Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia. • Galster, Richard W. and William T. Laprade • 1991 Geology of Seattle, Washington, United States of America. Bulletin of the Association of Engineering Geologists 28:235-302. Larson, Lynn L. 1988 Cultural Resource Investigation of a Proposed Warehouse in Renton, King County, Washington. Larson Anthropological/Archaeological Services, Seattle. Submitted to Public Storage, Incorporated, Renton, Washington. • Lewarch, Dennis E. 1994 Cultural Resources Field Assessment of the Fred Meyer Corporation Building Project Area, Renton, King County, Washington. Letter report from Larson Anthropological/Archaeological Services, Seattle, to Ken Booster, Fred Meyer, Incorporated, Portland, Oregon, 21 December. Lewarch, Dennis E., Lynn L. Larson, Leonard A. Forsman, Guy F. Moura, Eric W. Bangs, and Paula Mohr Johnson 1996 King County Department of Natural Resources Water Pollution Control Division Alki Transfer/CSO Project Allentown Site (45KI431) and White Lake Site (45KI438 and 45KI438A) Data Recovery. Edited by Lynn L. Larson. LAAS Technical Report #95-8. Larson Anthropological/Archaeological Services, Seattle. Submitted to HDR Engineering, Incorporated, Bellevue, Washington. Mullineaux, Donal 1970 Geology of the Renton, Auburn, and Black Diamond Quadrangles, King County, Washington. US Geological Survey, Professional Paper 672. 20 • • Reid, Alfred • __ 1991 Archaeological Monitoring at Sbabadid Site (45KI51) During the Earlington Woods Development Project, 1990. Submitted to Holly Corporation, Tacoma, Washington, Contract No. 947001. On file at Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia. Stump, Sheila 1990 Letter report from BOAS, Inc., Seattle, to Gregory Steinhauer, Gregory Development Company, Bellevue, Washington, 31 December. On file at Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia. Welch, Jeanne M. and Guy F. Moura 1991 A Phase I Cultural Resource Survey and Inventory of Cultural Resources, King County, Washington. Western Heritage, Inc., Olympia, Washington. Submitted to Northwest Building Corporation, Seattle, Washington. • • • • 21 • APPENDIX 1 Individuals and Agencies Contacted • Appendix 1 Individuals and Agencies Contacted Ozbolt, Svado, Property Owner, Meeting, 2 July, and Telephone, 10 July, 1996. Pacheco, Walter, Community Services Director, Muckleshoot Tribe, Telephone, 10 July, 1996. Steel, Sara, Information Specialist, Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Meeting, 10 July, 1996. • • 23 APPENDIX 2 Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation Cultural Resources Survey Cover Sheet Cultural Resources Survey Cover Sheet Author: Dennis E. Lewarch. Eric W. Bangs. and Lynn L. Larson Title: Cultural Resources Assessment of the Schneider Homes Renton Apartments Project Area, Renton, King County, Washington Date: July 12. 1996 County: King Section: •$ Township: 23N Range: dE Quad: Renton. Washington • (For Author's review) Total Pages: 24 Acres:. This report: Site No. . • _X_ Describes the objectives&methods. 45KI51 _X_ Summarize the results of the survey. _X_ Reports where the survey records and data are stored: _X_ Has a Research Design that: Details survey objectives Details specific methods Details expected results Details area surveyed _ . Details how results will be feedback in the planning process • OAHP Use Only NADB Document No: OAHP Log No: My review results in the opinion this survey report does does not conform with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Identification. Signed: • Date: 25 NOTICE OF PROPOSED SITE APPROVAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Approval (SA) and Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) Application has been filed and accepted :with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: OZBOLT CONDOMINIUMS/LUA-96-159,SA,ECF' ' ' ' - DESCRIPTION: . ; i=; The applicant proposes to construct,two separate buildings, each containing,18 condominium units (36 Aunits total). The maximum building height would be'35 feet. 'The proposal'inclUdes.66 parking stalls with 32 provided as covered garage stalls. GENERAL LOCATION: 430 Maple Avenue PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval Building Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City H',,___ Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site. plan approval. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. ir il 7'.. .P1 1 i �iRi`I Il �in - S 2nd . ST tam iii=m1 lik . Q iir _ • . itill. We 174/i w 4 IN iimil - - mom= ____f- Ir.,„• ---,w oil• ! - 14' slli I r & 1. ;TN lir. _v weliriAT rhh1b0Ni!� :41 3rdSLIT ■�1iliallitf 7-- • arlivirArst 440.0.-"y"----- 7...L. • MINN .1 11 Nil IIMI Er' C - ,,,, Awry 6-- ‘ -- L tm. MEM mil ill Aka, .1,c. zip: • lit ..., MIN 11•1111 =Ili lig rig MN MI= 7 .,, 4. /pp. itt--46 , 70,- * • ;,..., ...,. . - .. ,=1 mg a ,..., i ...4.411111, _Ifiri 41-41-11 PI ell . 'iliN MU - iirmaitt • 04111 °Ilk 9,1A . "icC MEN = CT ' illhaVirafr 414IF 44 a lift% • ' ii I MI . ' tilftli Vw abIbioNtit Allek ,A \ik-- iro Itk.h PI- =3. 11%,F. - ii - it ---witerpo, Alk.4.41 Odig di• PI I I•• . 1;', . ill th • 1r 11. P - -.'IJ . iri/ i&iiillit 10.000, MR ii :■: III am I ' fr _=III —— 2 • • = iill� 7th IST '4 MIR �`� .� SW _ ,� i s iii F-1 I II . 1 I 11 I t-I i •i .r_ I . . , I , L . • • • • • • 11 t 11 ii}ii} �� i}E i1 i 111 ! 111 f ill • 4 ' i r w w • DEC 2 0'9 6 } .�� :., •CITY OFRENTON QX3 Z • Development Sens Division s� • 200 Mill Avenue South • PB METER • Renton,Washington 98055 71�4676 4�P TAQ • ; • Alfred Fabre 461 Maple Ave SW • Renton, WA 9gp55 It � y G ADDRES. ITI h1 =; ,{� J ;1 9.3 °a7laeL,l a.1z.�i i.e.....a,..v..-i,.�:.r n.�.,i..: .:4 `��' %..`.v�r�,'4/rr J:1 NL�j^' ?Iii???is1??iii??tiii??i'ti?? S?o'•1?tEili?i? ? i??i CIT € RENTON , ' i l�: { = Planning/i3uildirig/Public Works Department - - . . • Jesse Tanner,M• ayor - . ., G}egg Zimmerman p E.,Administrator December 23, 1996- '. Mr.Kenneth Peckham Schneider Homes Inc. • - - - . - _ • 6510 Southcenter Blvd. • • - , - • ' Tukwila,WA: '98188 - _ _.. . , RE: =Ozbolt Condos,LUA96-159,SA,ECF —Application Submittal Requirements . ; - ` • Dear Mr.'Peckham, _ _ ,F. The Development Services Division of the City of Renton has determined that additional information is • . :required in'order,to continue evaluation of the subject application. •'The drainage report submitted is -- •; ' - ' i a ncomplete, containing only down stream analysis. -A"complete drainage'report is required for site.ii - ,' = - plan review and approval ',-I have attached a copy of a memo from Neil Watts,'Plan Review Supervisor, _ `which outlines the required contents for a drainage report.for a conceptual drainage plan• . :In addition,- - 'the`'site •is'•known to-have landmarks" or _evidence•of 'archeologicalcultural :importance. ' The' ' • • :Environmental-Checklist-provided with'the application references an archeological report prepared by (:' - `•Larson Archeological Inc. A copy'of this report was not submitted with the application. Both.of these " ' , - • application',submittal requirements:are necessary,for;.evaluating:the proposed :project-for SEPA' ' • - -- , environmental review _ and for Site Plan Review.r ��`; 4--�� ; y ,, • • :The,:proposed:,project ;was;•=tentatively;:scheduled:for`consideration;:by; the`Environmental.Review' • - . - ;'Committee'on Jan 21,- 1997.• .This meeting may;have to be'rescheduled dependin g`on when the. requested submittal requirements are'received for evaluation by staff. • - :Pursuant to Chapter 36 nal'of the Renton`Municipal Code,-fi decisions on land use permits:are-required ' -within.120days from the date'an application is.deemed complete.:,Time periods in which an applicant - is requested to provide'additional information, perform required studies, or,correct plans, are excluded fromthe`.120 day time"'linut.' Once the requested information is:'received to the.satisfaction of the.' 'Development Services Division;•the 120 daytime limit'shall iecommence'(Section 4-36-7.H.1). -If you have any questions or if I can be of further assistance,Please call me at 235-2719. ' -f •- • Sincerely,' : • - . _ . � C Project Manager_ - cc: Salvo andtLucy,Ozbolt,'Property:Owners': -,• ` ' • ,- , JanaHuerter, CityofRenton-Land-Use Supervisor ' - - Neil Watts, City'of Renton.Plan Review Supervisor - , • • 200 Mill Avenue South-Renton,Washington 98055 6!4 This aaoer contains 50%recycled material.20%nost consumer NOTICE OF PROPOSED SITE APPROVAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Approval (SA) and Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: OZBOLT CONDOMINIUMS/LUA-96-159,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION,.. ._: h;'',' " The applicant proposes to construct two separate buildings; each containing'18 condominium";units r(36 units total). The maximum building height would be 35 feet. The,proposal includes 66 par( stalls with 32 provided as covered garage stalls. GENERAL LOCATION: 430 Maple Avenue PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval Building Permit - The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. " _ SEEM Ffi ir khelit h4 .4CripallillIIIII lal illiii MEM= ars 11111;1111 PRI' imil ii.intiop I 7 Ifte--724, ellillffiliipt ii, 114 2 i irp 4ftiii r poi a it 4,4,41,11oN aryl,I _141 3 S - a iti,rtti...0 tr y.,„ 0 Tigaii. illpipotiii min mei :I - E 10 11\wiii lop. ;7 . ., . = , ,__.=_ _Aus_ ..._,_:= 0 ...ft. 0:14,..... a eif 7 win. akz,...imp 1 !,-I1 WI MN mim Citil It\ • • . ganiiblitrg * ''3 < 111-1 MI 13-13 II • i4tr. &.' ',l ��r tlr,j j - a '' 1 3 �� ai P _ itc-.1- • = r .. a _ Lga iiiI _ o._. 1/4ils\se lik an nu am IMO OM r**-1711.41seignifirifol ' *li . . 1 I:S. 'E-ii a .... : 1 / r = •0 SIN 7th ST MIMI, dim = L 11 1 11 I ii 1 I 1 1 1 i i 1 i 1 i ._-T gr— ti • AE py tom+ -, CITY OF RENTON Development Service Dhriston Dec 2 ors s a p: 0 .�. 2 R • 200 MIN Avenue South • .4 •:x� • Renton,Washington 98055 ((�gyp • f 8 METER • 7154676 • '- • - Ricardo & Flora Ocampo 469 Maple Ave SW Renton, WA 98055 1 . t 4,6 : : C:. . 1.7' . = NT......::;:.::::::...:....: ::..:::::::.:::::.:......:.:...:::.�.::::::::. .1 ..... D N.G...PRO..P.ERTY TOWN RS.::..:::::. ..:::::.::L I:S:T.::::.O..:F::S:U.R R O:UN:.....::I..::...::: ..:::.::.::.. IIIII ::..:::. :::.: :.�::::::::::::.:::.�:::::::.:::::::::::.::::: :;.;:.;;:.;:.;;.;;:.;:.;:::::.;;:.;.;::.::.;»:.:;.:;:.;:.;:.;;:.;:.:;;;;;;:.;;:.::.:<:.;:.;:.;;;:<.;:.:::with�n:::300•>feet°o:ttie.�.su ci.. ....:::..:.. C----APTZ)1U) PROJECT NAME: OZ&OL-1 66r3- utvv11.91 tyw(-5 APPLICATION NO: 1(09' 151 r 5A L ' The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL • ' Fred MeyerInc. P.O. Box 42121 Portland, OR 97242 NUMBER y 182305-Tax Lot 34 Salvo/Lucy Ozbolt 430 Maple Ave. SW, Renton, WA 98055 182305 Tax Lot 165 Roundup Co. P.O. Box 42121, Portland, OR 97242 182305 Tax Lot 215 Rudolph_Zaputil 420 Lind Ave. SW, Renton, WA 98055 Lot A Earlington Add Beg at NXO 0 Mathewson 425 Maple Ave. SW, Renton, WA 98055 Lot A Earlington Add Per Of Tr Eleanor Bertagni . 18005 113th Ave. SE, REnton, WA 98055 Lot A Earlington ADD Beg at A T ineFs;Robison : ,. 9670 Rainier Ave. S. ,_ Reattle, WA 98188 Lot A Earlington ADD Porgy Tract Nathan el i•-� .-c'...::c HollandEworth 431 Maple Ave. N. , Renton, WA 98055 Blk 9 Lot 1 Earlington Add Lot Michael & Della Shane 513 Cedar Ave. S. , Renton, WA 98055 Blk 9 Lot 2,3,4 Earlington ADD. William & Inez T Taylor 316 SW 4th Place, Renton, WA 98055 Blk 9 Lot 3,4,5 Earlington ADD: Michael McGerry 412 SW 4th Place, REnton, WA 98055 Blk 9 Lot 6,7 Earlington ADD,. P Alfred Fabre 461 Maple Avenue, SW, Renton, WA 98055 Blk 10 Lot 1,2 Earlington ADD Ricardo & Flora Ocampoc 469 Maple Avenue,SW, :Renton, WA 98055 * Blk- 10 Lot 28 Earlington ADD. five 04, 77 �' (Attach additional sheets, if`necessary) (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER • • . Applicant Certification I, j AA-)69 1 , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: O sty of Renton Technical Services Records P� ' •� c' C'Title Company Records .• '':osig� -•92 King Cou Assessors Records /cr o01Aspy !• p�uG Si ae Date /�/`6/5 �►•.10 ' f wii (Applicant) p NOTARY ATT TED: Su cribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, r and for the State of Washington, resiclin, a' r %- on the /.270 day of d� . , 199,S . Sign-d` (Notary Public) • •":*:f• :f::ti;:;isS:}}Yiii:L:i:i:ii:?{:`:ri::{ii{:iii:?Sin... �:::�ii:t•:•{?:i)::v:}:;:ii:4iiii::::+;�i.�ii}T'{y:::::n::.:::.. .. ... :....:.may;�. .�:::::::::.::::•:::::::::.iii:•iiii:h;x:.;.v:t;;}.ii:•iY'L}i}:i:i:Svi:>':ti4'•i:;:tir:;+:�•.4:;: w.,, .:'^%tti••:..•.....{:ti•:i:ti4};?{:::v v. ..4..:•:w:::•Y:ttMi.titJ::.v:w...., NIA LIN ............................................... > ::>•:s•i:::::i}:•:;:;;}:;i;:;i:;':':.:rS:i::iii?::::>:::r::;: `:::rS'�::S:i::iSi::Si?<:: ::i: :i:'•:`•ist<::::r:;:i;::: :: ;:i::::i::r;:;:<;:;<;:;<;::y::�: i .+„2:`::;:<:;:::;:;::: ............................ it lain e d cat e' � to <: �:,•':;:::.>.>:;';:.;:.:.;........• .::.� .. ,:.:.::: ''a s t. . . ... . . a ...a ..:. .. .....:..e e.b.Y:.c.�rtfY:th...t: t.:..:.:...::..:::�..:...: P..:....P................p.P.: ;;:. :;>:.;;:.::.;:::: a........... eactklisted:�>:�'cot°•e�t��::>o.......e..::Qn::.,.�`'�....,. 3....... ...... .,.:..........:......................... .:!9�ed<��< ��;::>•• "�> ?`�� �'s<;`r€`'?���'s>��< Date:>::i` ............. ...',f. ``'<�`�� <<�''<`'> ' �<> ���� �<�'�><' ti:NOTA ti ........n......................... .................................................................:.............:.:::::•:.�::.�:.�::::•:.�:•::::�:::::•::.�:•::i::::::?:w;;:•:•.�:.:�::::::::::..:.�..`..�.�:,:';Ai:;F:fA'•i:::•'.•i:tt v:tS}}::::.�. i5;:{:Siik i:S�ii'riiiiii':ii'riiiiiii:ri'r'riiii vijji:iiiiiiiTi}i::i:^:ii�i:Ciiij:i::S^i.'•ii:i:i$iiiiiii;:i}ii:t54:�:>.�ii::?'iiY:`iii:::Sjv>iiiiii.:ti"'}Y::•i%'..... .........,. :..�.::.::w::::::::::.�:•.:�•::::r.:::::::::•:::::•::::::::::::'::t:t:ttit;:•i.:ii:•}:•iii}i:J:?•:•;^::•<:"::::•;y'.•i:!Li::tt t•i"•i:"•iiy}};:::J:4i:4i•'::.:'ti..;n<. .. :. .. /...:�:::::: Al'1'ES.:T:':<:5 s ....4. d..a.... s.....a....: e.:q:.:.,:::..:...,::..: .:.:.::....rY..:.:......:....�...... . .................. .:...:........,.... resrdl. <:'at�:.�«:>::• :�::<: .>:�:::..}.:.:::::>::>::::::::<�>�:«:><:: ::>::on::the<::>:>"•':::��::>::» a ..:o::.� � ... �:::.. �..:::.:::::.:.:: ..................... Ilslprop.doc ,e,//#M ‘fi REV 07/95 2 NOTICE OF rtIOPOSED SITE APPROVAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Approval (SA) and Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: OZBOLT CONDOMINIUMS/LUA-96-159,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes to construct two separate buildings, each containing 18 condominium units (36 units total). The maximum building height would be 35 feet. The proposal includes 66 parking stalls with 32 provided as covered garage stalls. GENERAL LOCATION: 430 Maple Avenue PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval Building Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file i?._ iiitiritiiir•s•I,i-i,—r i_D-L1f-i-Y.1 Q1.1 dentification. • • fi w, 1 , gic ., II ■ S 2nd Sar a •ice ST • ..=c- IlLim. ni i . ..,,,,. i 7 LA* '4Wiiii i 4411 --....._, .. -.„__. iiiiib*- 4�i a!' lir 3rd S ■i 1�1■ '2 IN ftika...._44* • r— /fir, ,4141/aties,1 ak1[111P11gIL,ill...7:1 ..11 111% dip; Hi ■l0 HPPE1 :ICE [ 4Ir /04 atiak 1.‘/ 611 MN =.7\II MIK IMMII kr aiz--11.1' %*.;" 7 .../ ALF. -.... ipie. i 0•- -0 7 11111 VII • „mr ma...a ...,..„ 11411 #ilio . tiLIII sumo = I I" IN . .. - '4Z.> NI 0.1 = 1= . i •eitasi MA 61i r/if ..,. „fp 4. 0 IN r— Li =a /- iiiisio airmo t j®, ., - 4 \' - r �.:: - ittis ii377, — — — — , .. .. . sue - -op�7°°' _TE _•. n, = � r .� —__ — — =.ma _. °*1:11:711 , II" -7 r7 �- , 1 =: _ - - ?PP"- ma SW 1 —�r I� 1_ ■i_ 7th ST /),,,/1 - ,' I I I II I l II 11 1 f ) .,r•_ _ I_ - 1 I i � . . L -.—.T1 ems._ •, . N rio , • PENDING APPLICATION PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: MOLT CONDOMINIUMS I LUAAU-150,SA,ECF . DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes to construct Iwo separate buildings, each containing 18 condominium units(35 unite loan. The maximum building height would be 35 feet. The proposal Includes 88 parking cells with 32 provided as covered garage stout GENERAL LOCATION: 430 MAPLE AVENUE • PUBLIC APPROVALS: _Building Permit _Preliminary Plat _Short Plat Conditional Use Permit _Rezone XXXX Site Plan Approval 1 MIX Environmental Review -?aline Conditional Use _Other _FM&Grade Permit _Shoreline Substantial _Other Development Permit • The application can be reviewed In the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. I Comments will be accepted any time prior to Public Hearings,during Public Hesdngs,or prior to an administrative site i applicanl�'s'NotCoomat enis for Substablic Shoreline Permits must be recaived within ihMy(30)days from the last date of Application•publication in the Valley Daily News. For further information on the application,or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD end receive additional notificationsoons o of the Clly's environmental determinations,appeal pedods and/or the public hewing date(s)for this project,please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. was_ -.-. _ • ////i szo71 :O to r-`a 2nd • sr i l' i��.i�0 lir p irop� �� Via. Ipl win®_ra • ii. Egimail.‘ I.=. ==. 3 . - Phiii3O. A--:0' Iv jo ., wiii y ..'F..'. of E ' /.52171i;Viirt-Ilino,s;iiiimat . . 117... .,,.... .al: grk wiP.- • • ......4.M. shbilk// --....4A %. --.'• .S:E. M 11.--..1 " .1111111111111111111killlir lb iLill ME )11' =c� ' • Mtn Sr = �;_ nif-TI'• 1 I it 1 n-r--) ,e i- .. r r r, r .• w--a PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT:NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION."- _. _ . CERTIFICATION . • I, S(.t_ �lJ� JGt �1 a hereby certify that 3 copies-of the above document were poste G y me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on . Dzr nbe4 a l icaa • Signed:. iiL., 3o ik V1 .• . STATE OF WASHINGTON ) (.., • ) SS } COUNTY OF KING ) - r•' I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that c -n�*- CkSd--)-,' ,, 111606. signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free end oluntary act fqr ttitr't?sei: '`- - and purposes mentioned in the instrument. . %.r , • },, `r\ • Dated: I . r • Q3 , /q 1 (a ;� : Note Pub l in and for the Stat f ashington • Notary (Print) //Y14)6/� ,v k yin r,(n.Q 'GC- � My appointment expires. G) , .-q-9 9 NO TAR Y.00C _...) PENDING APPLICATION PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: OZBOLT CONDOMINIUMS/LUA-96-159,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes to construct two separate buildings, each containing 18 condominium units(36 units total). The maximum building height would be 35 feet. The proposal includes 66 parking stalls with 32 provided as covered garage stalls. GENERAL LOCATION: 430 MAPLE AVENUE PUBLIC APPROVALS: Building Permit Preliminary Plat Short Plat Conditional Use Permit Rezone XXXX Site Plan Approval XXXX Environmental Review Shoreline Conditional Use Other Permit Fill&Grade Permit Shoreline Substantial Other Development Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted any time prior to Public Hearings,during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. Comments for Substantial Shoreline Permits must be received within thirty(30)days from the last date of applicant's"Notice of Application"publication in the Valley Daily News. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. illiOtivia a ��� �im IT . • w dim ,_e al / lifr �.. .�m. -4.11 min MAE .zcil .... mii S 2nd ST Ad* to Apo mull !!!!1911 LIFINIIiiii. NU - la ... • w,....... in . -111 ._-- lei ...._ ,,,,d .......„..... II lit 11"441i'ray Arplil8 3/4*% iiivWi '-i---p .jviiir 9AZ I * ♦ , aP N 7- , *,p ` .0 00. ill IIA►!I :u [ 7 •ivieft 0., ,, It \SI I E �/' r M —kW } =17: M ii A meAk 14,Ilk ..1.10 - - Q Imo. "ifr Ismto 0 pl. =1-i , P a k O�sth. p virit-vos.410illtt Adas,"•,A ‘4„, •► 11'� .. Pi ''" du. a _e Iwe sa,s —lily jTIMU010.-- 11, 11, VC VI in NT: [1)111 _at SW7th ST 7 i.. , a —•� •�"s I rr I 1. II I ... .,ti P--; IPLEASE INCLUDE:<THE?;PROJECT NUMBER>WHENrCALI ING:<FOR:PRO :E.�:FILE<;I A <:. QP R DENTIFICATION..;;;:::.,,,;::' t-" 7" CITY ---DF RENTON 'eel/ +� Planning/Building/Public Works Department v. Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator December 19, 1996 • Mr. Kenneth Peckham Schneider Homes, Inc. 6510 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 SUBJECT: Ozbolt Condominiums Project No. LUA-96-159,SA,ECF Dear Mr. Peckham: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. - It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on January 21, 1997. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. o Please contact me, at 235-2719, if you have any questions. Sincerely, J _ I Peter Rosen Project Manager • cc: Mr. & Mrs. Salvo Ozbolt/Owners • ACCrTUR.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer ............... ............................ ...............(. .)!................................................................ .............................. .. ...... .....:..NFO.RM/aTIO:N.::(con.t,. ::::.:::::::::::....... Note >[f'<fFere>:s'mo�e'tfia [o:�ezIe a.. .wn..,. t aseattacF'.�ar':'addi ion I.. iota'iiz:ed<Mas:tet'�A�`�lcaton>fo`r'eac}'.>own r.................................:.............:...... EXISTING LANDUSE S .f L FQfvl1 p2E5• t a e N c-c NAME: • 5I�1 r,I)t) ¶ -� OZ DO C.- .2 ADDRESS: �3 p -/�pL� d� S CJ. PROPOSED LAND USES: Jr(} J t i C.:Un)be)�1ai1.1 c‘)1 0•„AS Q2e)a Ira 71.30 &'1`1r,J5s CITY: 1 ZIP: 9S Sc 16E�To N EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Aef TELEPHONE NUMBER: _.? /7/ /'�/'� PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: NAME: 12 /OtJ E 1 t-� C• �1�Ff 1'1/4/1/4.. EXISTING ZONING: fe.UUL -c9 0 SC 4 c 2 6 G o,,nJCj c . ADDRESS: (05 (0 PROPOSED ZONING: f pvL.— c9--0 CITY: 'T l/k,12._. ,'( Lfa ZIP: 9,f • SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): "c 2 t TELEPHONE NUMBER: (-O(•) c(7-61 -z5t7) PROJECT VALUE: PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: (} u%T &'N�D AiW J 1 44.-44-- ' IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: 1v t /�bN.�,V�3 rA ��i9�� IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY >� SENSITIVE AREA? fl KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): //d-30 ' — �-�r = DEC 1 I " DEVELOrit,W6•;• CITY OF REN7p14t"ilL3 'e' if`>neces >::'`ra i.e t.. ..• >Y>'� tachs�e a . • :»:::>:::::::::>_»:<:>::»::::;::::_>::>::=::LEGAL::€:DES"CRLP d::::OF<P:ROP.ERT..... at ................................... ..):..::........:.....................:. .. :; O1�(.. ..F E. ................................................................... ......................... • >::>:>::>:>>;:<;:.;:>:>:<>:;;;:.:::>:»:<:> :.. ..:.....,..,:.. :..:...... ..:. . ....:: .......:...s€;...at>>a . .(.:>..... ..f. .st .....w...... ...te.r.m.n.e... . . .s............................................... ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ _ REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _ SPECIAL PERMIT $ SHORT PLAT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ TENTATIVE PLAT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ I SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _ FINAL PLAT $ _GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ _VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY _WAIVER $ _ FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT $ _ ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: _ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT - $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ _VARIANCE $ _ EXEMPTION $No Charge _ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ REVISION $ I, (Print Name) iJ4E1 f''•PdsW v&- , declare that I am (please check one)_the owner of the property involved in this application, 5e the authorized representative to act for the property owner (please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. ,, ��/ ATTEST: Subscribed a d sworn to before m a i t Public iri'.9n p(fi>Je- ��e-%i'4/49 for the State of residing a 1; (Name of caner epr sentative) /,J , on the/,014.d tot "" e (Signs re of Owner/Representative) ignature of Notary Public) ............. ...................:.::::::.::...........................................:::::::......T,h.ls.:sect�o.n:t .:..:...:.:. ........................... ...............1::::::.�:::::::..:::::::::::::::::.:::::::::.:.....:.:.::.::::.::::.:::::::::::::::::.:::::: P::>::>::::B.SP:, »`A<><>CPA:> >> <>:><>;;:`:><»>::::<: >:<>:<<<:::<<:><;;:::<<<>:::<>::>::<::>:_ ...,:,., .:,:.::::::::.::::«:.::::.::::..:::.::::..:,............................... ... ... ::::.....:.............................................. REVISED 2/95 Schneider Homes,Inc. Renton Condominiums Project Narrative October 28, 1996 Size&Location of Site: The site is located at 430 Maple Avenue S.W. in the city of Renton,Washington. The size of the property that is the subject of this application is 1.991acres. Current Use&Existing Improvements: Currently,the subject property is unimproved with no apparent use. The property is part of the Ozbolt residence which lies directly north of the subject property. The Ozbolt residence and the property in which the residence is located is not part of this application. Special Site Features: The site does not possess any significant natural features. Other than a drainage feature located along Hardie Avenue S. W.which includes some vegetation indicative of a wet area,there appears to be no wetlands on the site or that would be impacted as a result of this application. Location of Proposed Buildings: The proposed layout of the buildings to be constructed may obscure views of homes located along Maple Avenue S. W. Though the buildings will be set down at an elevation below Maple Avenue S. W.,the potential for obstruction exists due to the height of the proposed buildings. Even with that,partial obstruction is more likely to take place,than the complete elimination of current views. Proposed Use of the Property: The proposed project will consist of two separate buildings containing 40 condominium units. Each building will be 40 feet in height,and units will range from 1,000 to 1,200 square feet. There will be approximately 1.8 parking stalls per unit,with at least one covered/garage space per unit. Additional guest parking will be provided for. Access to the proposed project will come from Maple Avenue S. W.with an additional emergency access being provided for along the southern property line from Hardie Avnue S. W. Schneider Homes,Inc. Ozbolt Property Construction Mitigation Description October 28, 1996 Construction Dates: Once approved, Schneider Homes intends to start site development either late spring or early summer 1997. It is expected that site development and building improvements will be completed in late September or early October 1997. Hours of Operation: Site activity will be limited to the hours of 7:00 A.M.to 6 P.M.weekly. Transportation Routes: The transporting of materials to and from the site will be directed to major transportation routes and away from arterial streets to lessen the impact to the adjoining neighborhoods. Schneider Homes is open to recommendations to limit the use of local roads to lessen potential impacts per the city of Renton building officials. Measures to Reduce Potential Impacts: Schneider Homes,Inc.will adhere to all conditions of approval intended to minimize potential impacts due to adjoining areas from the site development and the construction of the proposed buildings. In order to minimize impacts from dust generated on the site,the site will be frequently watered down to minimize airborne particulates. Impacts from noise associated with the site development and the building of the proposed condominiums will be lessened by limiting site activity to the hours of 7:00 A.M.to 6 P.M. and ensuring that all motorized equipment used will be properly muffled. Impacts from water runoff will be mitigated by installing and maintaining approved erosion control mechanisms. We expect there to be no noxious odors associated with the development of the proposed project. DEC - 9 RP cm,Op0 o�N/NC : a :.�. - • CIT V O E:'RENTaON .... '._.. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES:DIVISUN :' • ENVIRONMENNT4 # ;CHECKLISTµ'=° Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW,requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement(EIS)must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal(and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done)and to help the agency decide whether and EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant,requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly,with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully,to the best of your knowledge. In most cases,you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal,write"do not know"or"does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these question if you can. If you have problems,the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered"does not apply". IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (Part D). For nonproject actions,the references in the checklist to the words"project", "applicant", "property or site"should be read as"proposal", "proposer", and"affected geographic area",respectively. DEC .1 , E j? DEVELA.: ,.:.. , _N.NG CITY OF RENTON 1 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project,if applicable: Currently referred to as the Ozbolt property 2. Name of applicant: Schneider Homes,Inc. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant: Schneider Homes,Inc., 6510 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila,WA 98188,248-2471. Contact: Ken Peckham, Schneider Homes,Inc. 4.'Date checklist prepared: August 12, 1996 5. Agency requesting checklist: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing,if applicable): Start Spring of'97. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions,expansion,or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes,explain. No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared,or will be prepared,directly related to this proposal. None known at present. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal. If yes,explain. None pending. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal,if known. Road, storm and utility design approvals,building permits,R/U use permits and fire system permit. 11. Give a brief,complete description of your proposal,including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) The proposal would allow for the construction of 40 multi-family units on approximately 2 acres. 2 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project,including a street address,if any,and section,township,and range,if known. 440 Maple Ave. South,Renton,WA. Proposed project includes tax lot 18-23-05-9244, Section 18,TWP 23N,R5E,W.M.,King County. If a proposal would occur over a range of area,provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description,site plan,vicinity map,and topographic map,if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency,you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit application related to this checklist. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site(circle one); Flat,rolling,hilly, steep slopes,mountainous,other. b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope?) 10%. c. What general types of soils are found on the site(for example, clay,sand,gravel,peat,muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils,specify them and not any prime farmland. The predominate soils on site are loose to medium dense silty sand. Below these soils are weathered sandstone and conglomerate sedimentary rock. Bedrock is located from 2 to 16 feet below the existing ground surface. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so,describe. None known. e: Describe the purpose,type,and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Material on-site will be graded per design plans. Approximately 500 c.y. of material will be relocated, all on-site. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,construction,or use? If so,generally describe. Yes,but highly unlikely. g. •About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after construction(for example,asphalt or building)?40%. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion,or other impacts to the earth if any: Temporary erosion control& sedimentation facilities will be provided. 3 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e.,dust,automobile,odors,industrial,wood smoke)during construction and when project is completed? If any,generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During construction activities there would be increased exhaust and dust particle emission to the ambient air. Objection- able odors could be caused by the paving of the streets. After construction the principal source of pollution would be exhaust from vehicular traffic. The increase in automobiles associated with the development would contribute CO, NO and SO2 emissions to the ambient air. No wood fireplace to be used. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so,generally describe. Vehicular emissions from traffic on nearby roadways would be the primary off-site source of air pollution that could affect the proposal. c. Proposed measure to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air,if any: Should construction activities be undertaken during the dry season,periodic watering if deemed necessary could be use to control dust. Automobile emissions should be negligible because of the standard regulated by the Washington State Department of Licensing. 3. WATER a. SURFACE: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site(including year-round and seasonal streams,saltwater,lakes, ponds,wetlands)? If yes,describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into.No. 2) Will the project require any work over,in,or adjacent to(within 200 feet)the described waters? If yes,please describe and attach available plans.No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description,purpose,and approximate quantities,if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so,note location on the site plan. "No". 4 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste material to surface waters? Post-development storm-water runoff containing some pollutants(primarily oil and debris washed from the road system)would be collected by the storm drainage system and treated with wet pond or biofilter swales. b. GROUND 1) Will ground water be withdrawn,or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description,purpose,and approximate quantities if known. "No". 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources,if any(for example: domestic sewage; industrial,containing the following chemicals ,agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system,the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable),or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve.N/A. c. WATER RUNOFF(INCLUDING STORM WATER) 1) Describe the course of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal,if any(including quantities,if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so,describe. Water runoff from impervious surfaces will be collected in the permanent storm drain and discharged to existing and new conveyance system. 2) Could water materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. "No". d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,ground,and runoff water impacts,if any: Temporary erosion control devices would be installed during construction. After construction, storm water runoff will be collected and directed to detention/retention facilities by the storm drainage system. 4. PLANTS a. Plant Description: X deciduous tree: alder,maple,aspen,other evergreen tree: fir,cedar,pine,other X shrubs grass X pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail,buttercup,bulrush,skunk cabbage,other water plants: water lily,eelgrass,milfoil,other other types of vegetation 5 b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Vegetation will be removed or altered in those areas where buildings,parking areas and drainage structures are proposed. c. List threatened or endangered species know to be on or near the site. None known. d. Proposed landscaping,use of native plants,or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site,if any: Cleared and graded areas would be revegetated with some native species and species common to urban areas. Replanting of plants and trees are proposed to enhance the site. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk,heron,eagle,songbirds,other Mammals: deer,bear,elk,beaver other small mammals Fish: bass,salmon,trout,herring,shellfish,other b. List any threatened or endangered species know to be on or near the site. None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,explain. Not to present knowledge. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,if any: None proposed. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy(electric,natural gas,oil,wood stove, solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating,manufacturing,etc. Electric power or gas will be used to meet the heating and lighting needs of this residential housing development. b. Would your project affect potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so,generally describe. "No". c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts,if any: The project will be designed to meet current King County&the state of Washington energy codes. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards,including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion,spill,or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? Not to present knowledge. 6 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. No special emergency services would be required by the proposed project. Normal public services such as police,fire, and aid calls are expected. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards,if any: The project will conform with applicable codes. b. NOISE 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project(for example: traffic,aircraft,equipment,operation,other)? Noise from traffic on surrounding roadways could have a minimal impact on the project. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis(for example: traffic,construction,operation,other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from this site. Noise levels would be intermittently high through construction,but should be limited to normal waking hours. After construction,traffic noise created by vehicles using adjacent streets may be present. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts,if any: Use of proper muffling devices and limitation of construction to normal waking hours would minimize construction related noise. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The proposed project will be built on a parcel of land that is currently vacant but lies adjacent to a single family residence and a multi-family apartment complex. b. Has the site been used for agriculture?If so,describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site.Land is currently vacant. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what?N/A e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? RM-I. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? RO. 7 g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive"area? If so,specify.No. i. Approximately,how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 70 residents. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace.None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts,if any: Not applicable. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans,if any: Project will be built in compliance with existing city of Renton comprehensive plan and zoning designations. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provide,if any? Indicate whether high,middle,or low-income housing. Medium income retail units. b. Approximately how many units,if any,would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,middle,or low-income housing. None. c. Proposed measure to reduce or control housing impacts,if any: Compliance with regulatory codes and standards would reduce the housing i_pacts of the proposed development. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s),not including antennas;what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 40 feet. Vinyl Siding. b. . What views in the immediate vicinity, would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts,if any: Landscaping would reduce aesthetic impacts on the prject. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Parking lot and building lighting for security and safety purposes from evening till dawn. 8 b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? "No". c. What existing off-site source of light or glare may affect your proposal? None known.. d. Proposed measures'to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Parking lot and walkway lighting will be directed in towards the proposed project. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreation opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?None known to be in the immediate vicinity. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,describe. "No". c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant,if any: None proposed. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on,or proposed for national,state or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,generally describe. None known. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological,scientific or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. See enclosed archeological report prepared by Larson Archeological Inc. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts,if any. None. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans,if any. Main access is provided from Maple Avenue. See proposed site plan. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not,what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes,Metro service operates on Sunset Blvd. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate?Approximately 1.8 parking stalls per unit will be provided. 9 V yl d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,or improvements to existing roads or streets,not including driveways? If so,generally describe. Some minor street improvements may have to be made on Maple Ave.where proposed project will be accessing Maple Avenue S.W. e. Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water, rail,or air transportation? If so;generally describe. "No". f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If know,indicate when peak volumes would occur. The proposed project is expected to generate approximately 264 daily trips,per average work day with 80 of these trips occurring during the AM Peak hour and 67 during the PM peak hour. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Any direct impacts will be mitigated upon mutual agreement between the developer and City of Renton. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public service (for example: fire protection,police protection,health care,schools, other)? If so,generally describe. Increased fire protection,police protection would occur as a result of this proposal. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services,if any. Any direct impacts to public services will be mitigated upon mutual agreement between developer and the city of Renton. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity,natural gas,water,refuse service,telephone,sanitary sewer,septic system,other: CCTV b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project,the utility providing the service,and he general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Water service will be provided by city of Renton with Sewer service also being provided by city of Renton. Electricity will be provided by PugetPower. Gas service will be provided by Washington Natural gas, and telephone service will be provided by GTE. Trenching will be required for the placement of the various utility services. C. SIGNATURE ' The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its d ision. Signatur . ider Homes,Inc. 10 Date Signed: / `/O/9 11 LEVEL I DOWNSTREAM ANALYSIS FOR: OZBOLT APARTMENT SITE PROJECT NO: 96120 CLIENT: SCHNEIDER HOMES, INC. 6510 SOUTHCENTER BLVD. TUKWILA, WA 98188 DATE: NOVEMBER 11, 1996 • 13268 ••• 4,;:ce nt9 AE8 I I ?S' DEC 1 1996 DEVELG+p�; it 7 t.,,rdry,ar^CITYOP OFF-SITE ANALYSIS TASK 1: STUDY AREA DEFINITION AND MAPS The project site is located within a portion of the Southwest Quarter of Section 18, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, Willamette Meridian, in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. The property is between Maple Avenue S.W. and Hardie Avenue S.W. , and is north of the Plum Tree Park Apartment complex. An apartment complex with associated parking is being proposed for the site. The property is approximately 2 acres in size and is mostly covered with short grass, some trees and brush along the property lines. Existing ground generally slopes from the northwest corner to the southeast corner of the property. Off-site runoff from the single- family residence north of the property enters the site along the northern property line and sheet flows across the site. There are no off-site runoff entering the site from the west, south and east sides of the property. Runoff collects in the existing ditch along the east side of the property then drains into the conveyance facility within Hardie Avenue S.W. which consists of 12" CMP pipes and catch basins. The stormwater then travels southeast along Hardie Avenue, then southwest along the Burlington Northern Railroad, then south where it drains into the conveyance facility within S.W. 7th street. A �/ .Qi _ \ G t E F G - ,_ „q _I op,, Big N A=jl --- v�I jam'' `I} -��1 -i }''i i � j i- - -- ----- H '� - r :�, _1 -• ! :s sr.I _ j• ��i , / i il• '�:;• N,y,,L.6' j7 ' NE �6TN j 'PI i ti - 1` yI < Q`-_-�sr.:�`' •5 H r_51 A SWTN z) zI z it I!I / ��� �1' N i •Sr:I��1� ,..f NE V VT I♦ 5rX ST • \t t-...,,,A.;. I'� P' BURNETT n 57 2 T� 7.:r, S/eaoPS°+ v Iw `_,II,S\�I ' '� 'b �Y NE `$ NE .- E b CI `.% !%.,II.•n ( .3 Lv REAR/ N I i Sill •'E.y .�Jl 'at /'E iz r IQ�BI \ .i Jj Q I •+✓ z 'J <' S_TI+�S�' _ _ •--te 4: 4:1i !�,-) '<. al ��'-050_% a �!� :1=- �i /r�,.� aF a SE I am') , ' r• �v� / ! I ,� --DS ST YINDSDR ,CUO�i['r[.:I it ' 7 Q, Y - sr- �=-I"- 5 > N <Ti I RCLCS _ I - - 3 < ,re !ram -ST! _r•N ATH sT: A�`" ,LRx 1rH a %�i -I' NE - 4TH Z 1 0 4. ST '4 __ 'i< <I7AD:sI I z:Il'il I ! <p �a�l� �% oj, i I I _ I ���333333 J GR£E14070 ! I /`•., ri w: j /��� OR[NrPv • 31 YR; �I ST 1_m� e�G„ S & <7NE 3R0 PL ! it _ _, _/J y.-hp $•a IRPORT 1 y! !Q. / •; w CEWET£RY J _ '`�.` NI� -�I` N AiRPpR7 WY \ J x %¢ � I�y`i,/ �r`'`y 9° g' -NI�.r' ....,xm i �—___ • ` '}i SI riLLICW_S/ Ln s 1'✓;12 r'd SI ! - ,/'-' NE 3 NE . - ^�N• .[ - ES K :i:i- - _ �. NW ZtIG ST . .._S rl4 rziw. - -f'- (_2N0 57 -J ' ' r S --`:i S<I VICTORIA G !_J ' ''J, 0 r {� al 1� '� \ Vr 2N0 PI - - ..•.'Ni , • C:iiDl.'{i r.t Si f I.w,il 6 ao' �\ al 'i , .k vF:iT '� 3^-- `.•` I REYTOH '^la `r n II r[MJNr (� rsr 3; d,, . �- _ =`''id,,, • O Sr' I 31 NS Nj ! I •< ./ CEDAR �I J i i� a[lvfr Q X 3..i�r 'r '.i [A� �s 'pI �La S 2ND ST1 t li I `'/r RIVER Ql +` CI FIERY 1� r!y` 'I�c �, r,E - .. -' _ - -_ r a/� .....• .�. -.?r-� / I I _ .r' PARR 0.' [1t� k. 1�r <::[!ISV=/14� S I lit_ - .t _ 2 3'l,Sr. `'D�r..' _ y•7j D ,�::: S 3RD I NI ''>I v,reilig$ rJ1 r- TO ► •n`' SE. 2ND PI SE - - / cfJ Jam•4NJ �/ s)w tt i 'Po,S s)Rn ST' r\{- NI' `I Q Q T. -I sa �J s, - 0� i, l .1u+ s 90 b V of �w�%`'p�' c '7,:'SUNA. S! 'arNi <'i�-+:- e I1 Q' r a <' i • `c�' li! ! ` �,�` ''' - -. • �� U `.A��' REN1oN i[.�• I _'-' �•[� •--y Ni ••CYJ, SE L}.f• `'�� - Sr,,' < it J7i ! �I t7^ ".o PAY Cam^ Q ='$E dtN� ZH% - PARK dv �' '[ _�///// CFNTfR \5'lNy i�•S'ilY I C! -'I I I \yI \�,o \,` - SE SIR `J, V p , •56 - l l'•aT •�JJ Y I wI57Mi' � ST 15iX r `6 Qo-'y4• ��(`y RD --� � ' SE l"- - , . �� _f Rp W 1 g j' m I I(= js�)\��ay �Q'"3�i����.~ a - - s ��._'>_. I�t I I i�I •.V56TN Sr _ RR - '- r r3� ,s'�SSTL .. . I' SW .:✓s. 2 S 6TH- i'ST - }. -_ '.-'-- - -- - - - ,c - - I 3 __._ __.-._-=1 .._._.._.__ST� \:i�- I erH iSr ii 51 � JrN' i it ._,5C Ss - " - . - s,in - 1--i-i�T Si ys:,,ar KIRLELCL�O i _ _ .. - LI l - ^ D6 AR. ,,r,Q'I, ait 'Vi '< �r SE•'ly.s\, Si GOLF ._ . \\ Z. a 3 w 5 i GM 'Y!!I II I �_9 rN Si t�vNl[LlP. SE! may` pS J \_ _ COURSE I _ __ T _ -_ = WY ;sf3 qARROLD yj, `H 9- • rST GD T -1 N a'�y, rFo ✓�� 4__Sv, to1X - S RENTN VILLGE PL 11 NSr qRR JC! R •/� . - 1/ �-.i 1ii- 5 ' F 4i . ( _2rH.ST / 111,,, F�0� o = �JiJTH - /��I \ YR 1 9'16TH: ST 1 SW iIVO -_ _1531,1 ',i�15TH � •r+•a }i J 1•� sr�.Ay w _� , _ C\SJ` /CF61R -- .. o V' ii ST Qom/ - _ ../. ''-' .l.rtf/ti"_'SC -_.;;_ A Fl o`SE c __ INTO RIVER 16TH ST S g'' i S 16TH ST 5 <\ . pS4 F9y 16M'ys S' � •.1^ N`` r ,.474. s \ 5�`Y 5 .°r r F_u '-t:Jr \ �1gpC �._;� PARK - `i Pc \� \'i �I17TH ST, fBl ,) ys/.!I A `' \• 'Bfq�F h.. r4= -;. s s, ` '� E` V `�- c ;4 _ N Sr 195H T I• "`\ 1 i[s 18TH^/vo 1 �\ \yam ST Rla ;� `Z� \ s b • \\� '4\p°sF �/a � _ }. I ��ly A<<f r `c-�: _.__ � •aa Pi ST • a -J\'>4 it:•� L, sFp''' ' �'.�. 4', sT \� •..NEdi RES G 'SMa a?'rANtear I oq +an; Jc. :LL A `:' sr ❑n.. �.SE`-•r -•sri"°^.J 555.ic___-J DACE • 'a PARR 1 SI 4_ .n "' +ACx -. .Si r .'l„ :) ^ PUGET B• v y�o'?',y.:i ^. .o ^sr •. < 'fie. a }'i s.I,;'.° gli._L Jsr e.....r` 'i • • 6 ,s"N,.. i11 ., ••.. Sv 2JR0:ST S ZDRD - �I y , i• .:_:14L...r_ - - , _ ST j; VICTORIA .\r I-\sr4 i I---—-- ,... . I al 5,Srn Sl s S NS _ 167110: , _ ''I .. - ''f .. ..- . e ' 26TH J� - PI SE'S SW cE 71iH NN a' 56 •_ --Cyr,1,7 �q'O•¢ I Xi - _ ¢' n,•0±''. _ ,:.7 ... - S-T -r - �5'�2' ,y\•-s '� '<I S 27TH ST N .I64 U{ 7 SE 164 iH• Si. _ _° = i-: ,. _ _ ,_ r .- •� s'S >;,•SR `Qf?;S jS °5 1; jI SffiM : SE i55IN SC 1TSP M- .SE - - _••s� •,--=a ,,a' = _ SL 29TN ST -n ti'r a mc. "y`�- ,\•.,I[i„, sE H a -, -, •Sr • •,i.n :-•,. ,,,.. ..,TH Sl 21 S n' •r•. _ •G °ly'S'r:a ? Mcr \ si73 ,o. Q .,I! u..n. :) �t ' - .. ror.v '1 WpQQ o Sv JOTT, s' r - 'al_ s LAJ - - -' ,,' : : aE•v. _ L J15r Sr Si Pl'.--'h srcr { of ' • i _ : 6 .i1,I - N SI •r •' D 7 .: :';'41,,.., ▪ 7' _ .i SE JI.7NO. _ Si =S( .. - - _ - .:S' .... :13 v ` , .,.�_,f�lh \_ a 5 JBrH. _ .',RC -_. - -. _ _.w. ti7C£ •. ' 39TH .. SrI " r. " - .. I a _'� ._ ( 4' 4 - - SE I 1%5iH - .. SE o _ i s cJ rRr .. - r'7 'v . :LST Si I��� VALLEY _ \,+ - _ ii ...• ,.�1 I:c,.,. i%',^ 1,115i11V1 nue _ Il .,FDrr.I' '� ,c� c0 1' Si !> U /\ i ! - �l 30 J 3 rd. X 29 AVE - if i ______ kr/ic,,f / / (*AL . irli ki sit: i 0 OM • .DO%. iii, __,,---:-__-:=7_-_-_-7------) „ .._____ '•••-t.-.1- % bilamillig# -jil i Q c o ! 0 A I ill - -: ix 11 a Ile ii /I7 6 0z/r ),11/4111./:// ! V: I \lift • 1 via . k [I 4:: ' -LI 111 n/ _____`� I'S9 4` ! ' ` �// % i �\ 53 / I L i O /�� ��\\\ \\ \ / 29 _ PLACE h. .... ,. _______ __y ( , 'c/ 1 _ �'' -, is ' �,/ �-'► , // -;�--\• ' 26 \\ \\ ` /'hj / Q-12S _-`x/I26 • / /' . I i / /26 I . \y /� \ \�,�/% r-I --.7 - /4--- i, *VII -- -c ,- i // I \ 0 ‘ , /, / . \. , 0 x i , 1 t , 4 . ,l2i I 1 : , , I Q / • I/ iii , / /1/ \\ <� \ \ \ \ 1 28 I 0\ / l oV 0 - - *I � X � j�� 11 \ \ X \ X / • _- X 97 SUNSET -_---- -'�‘ ,� /• • - \ \\ 1\ \\ �y \ `\ \ \\ 0 L -------- - ------ Q i _ _gyp ;; ` \\ \ \ \ \? \ \ 31 I I "'-' 0 111. // /". 6D .144 \ \\ \ \ 16 ,c-;-Z \ \ I -\ Pqk BR -... •-• AVE. , m;, ' v. \ \ \lip , ,...53 lip \ \ \ 25 \ \ I. imilikoh. ,...00111111w- ----- (,_, _LI_ 7 0 1 i ad \ \ 1 eft // v. . •\\ \ i\ •• . \ \--1..\ 1 \ ---) .... -- _t-i--'C\ ..--,% %i // __-_= �\25 \ \\ \\\ \vim %/ \\ ; p '' 22 %\ '_.].. �' ,. , o \\ 1 , _ 4_ a • . j�w SCAT. TREES / 0 �... �... O �Y a \ /'''�� MILWpUK• E gT. \ \an I\ � w `� ;30 !/ Oii I\\ \ \ : 22 ii / / ` _ � 1 • \�;� • i/ \ \ ` \1 �I 23 X / � 4fi i <,\ 1 \I 0 C.: 11.1""ftsik.. --- -........ 464 ` X 2 ' I I\\ d • \ c 1 1 z. 1 ilk - 35 ! r 1 3 24 \X -- --- EARLINGTON GOLF COURSE 20 7-0,00 / �`� it— x 16 • `\\\ j x �I kl r SCACI: /"= Zo•• '% • / cz, \\ 1 , ..... (9 • . ... •-.__ I I tD( L2 / rT21 •• I ' ir./ . - / 1 t 7 ,t. • o_�s� 4 �4 4b °�� ,S 4 • 4 • r *- ; �.c•yam oF•067I n* i14 p44 3 ..044p4 614e, v!l- -2N �i � ? ,d E•Ps•LI. Ss -7 • *.-is-ee =] al - Sio n. �. / . iwt - t' ErZ -S L /'S - a9 �- r ila .1 +; - .yr , oQ r, 9cti alfs 1. Ai' e,-41. .\ tfii]] WI bi V' . r :4- / 1 oy cwtiti'M . D s _A VT7 *1-.1. \\*I7-1 . 1.1 v @ I -' ; t _ i.-g-. to . .... a, 0 Mi\ a. /VT' a s pC .....\ 0 -z. .4 , _� 9O� ' Lr / igrAPIP -trrr- S-� g + �� g / it► - o N - an TASK 2: RESOURCE REVIEW The 100-yr Flood Plain map shows that the project site is outside the floodplain area. The different Sensitive Areas Folio Maps are also attached and indicates that there are no identified sensitive areas on- site. Per the attached U.S. Department Of Agriculture, King County Soils Survey map, most of the site soils are classified as Beausite gravelly sandy loam (BeC) with the remaining portion classified as Urban land. The other King County resource maps do not cover this area, since the site is in the City of Renton, and is therefore not included. • I . .. ,--- "Ol \ , •;•.;,;;• ,'4,F. ,,....,; ., ‘,...A —4—CITY OF RENTON — ( _ic.cc •-i, 530088 :(;61491 ' :•,,- - ——__I •-- ;:i: CORPORATE , • .... LIMITS _—I D z 2 til CC I > < 0 0 , r . ,;.. ..._ I z ii i . . 0 z ......''''?. _____ .. (0 I z z. D. z w > ,... ..: • . _1 >•• < . .: • ) . p . , 0 ZONE X CITY OF RENTON 530088 • A IHPUH F WA TREET • • . , ..- _ _ 1 KING COUNTY I UNINCORPORATED AREAS -=:-_-_1C_ 530071 _ KING C°UNTy RENTON 18 , --7-----_____, „4 I r-tt,vE , , . . '',/) <-94,_, . -s-'-' •-- ..LiMITS (iSs.04, ..„ (A , 41 6 9 • . •rl ,.. ''''''s"-•.-___,_..„,__..,__,_._,_____ OULEVARD ZONE X • "" _-3/ / \ 4 71.577-E FEMA /VA _ \-- . __ _.---_-____--- --- - ., \ scALE: p, = s oc:.. \•-- ,------.\ \ rf,-•. -I.,. Kt i u-) 7 _.__.--- -i:. • -. l.' . . 1. : .. 1--1- • . . • • • ' i+, \,:I T' j � I ll.. / .. {\ �\��, X._ a:I' .1.. '� ` i.. -- — • ( 1i \\\l\l I t �----•, L. 1.__!—..>, . ._.I ,i},,,pp.d1'..j • :. I • _ - ' I 1 1 k '>_� I II, ` �j . ., - I M1 I . i•: / iI ir •h�l - _ I. k, 1 \ - � I .. .. • • i - Ii., r---I ,l 1-;'i,l _ - I:.1 c• • .1 •I •I j f. .ram--: i • .. I'�i ! , I. I,K -f•r-.--.l3 c-l---1' • r •-_ w ' /` i• ,'_�c_�i,� CIS'!. • r., C.1,, '... I i. i 1irIi\' -r ,t • . ` `` . fi� ^ `r� j , ' :._4. . _ ! { - lz_ • • -11---I ` I I.---1 I (2 1 I I I I •'8prirl) hlefl I -1.; ``1,II l I i 1,`_ ^ • _\`', I .( - �' i ` .I -I 'L, -- -.I ' - J -- - .-_. ,. I -' �`„ 1 ,1, Coal Mine Hazard """`amish 4 He- U`S Areas . the {� 5'CAL(. /"- / fr//LE ' , 1 • . . , • .:. . • . •••••• • . , .:1 • • 1 t , .. ,. '..." r ::..... - , • sr- .•• '•,• : I •,•• : • ; .1_, • , , • • 1. 1.' •, .);\ ..1 • iv.: . , - „.._: „ ,.. . . ,-, - y._, (,•- -k • _._ .....y.,i..:C.',).1A 0 , ic?_•,t'.' : I ' . ; \-1.I.-.',i: : .C*1-' v".• .'',.. - ' , . ; ••. .'.:J,IiYVI`•)li,„1-iTjt; . 1 •; , , .., ..,/ , • : i., : • i :,• 4, ,•!:,...:-. /:,/ ri; ••::1 1.!. t' .. , •.- , - •• " 1,l•-• ' :i •/y1 ••: • .. , -.,I, I I/;•)r1 c-; ' ,'"ir'•_:,-,-,r'.':'.-.11, ., • • "..,. 71-• --- •k, , ,: • A. •. • • ' .; ').:\ 1),•.1\.4-----' \•% '- . ' ' ', .1 ) - •• : ' • ... ' ,'-: " .--,-- i - ..,-.- _. i , •'6‘. xl:-'-i' • . . ''' -'- . I . ,: '‘,.l. .. i - ;- ),••••/",•.;•.• • •,- - - ., .:5 i;4.-•• ,`•-, ! .• - (-,- 4 ; ..) , ' . ''. ;•-•d,,•___,,____, , I - 4-.-r t ,.•.4-. • , • ".... ...--'-''.. -'',.. .1 ..):I l , ' / ''' , ,. ,, ,1 1 • ti, A . • , . . ; . —. .„ •. 1..,.//, ; ,I, : ...•-:, , , . , , . . • . ,., • 1...,-1 - ; • -• ''1"'• L .,• t i : : : :. . i - .,,,, '"1-11'\ ,-'.1 / • J '. ''-'1,•-;.:11i.'',/,',-,..).--.-4-" i . • .. I ->:• •---1:-... 1; ...., : • - _1: , k. • r• .: .,,,: ._:, .__ ..•,::;Y.-.'-',f-7,-,-,•1---' .‘1.-'-'/•-\ ..,..^' i I ;.. ; ••:,.' 1 / ',, . r,: - • _71-, ! i 1 •• ' d ., ••• -• . 1 ...-• , .. •, , ,. E.:. --, •', (-1 I... i • ' '1 1--• , , ..,--••.,..1 ,..__. . . -,, ....-_-._/_i-2•L',.. __.,-",. . .1' t-,1 • •-, . • .1 •T . , -- ... .-:\'•., . ..--;---2.:. •-•-i--- .."; 7 i f-r---1,.` •-•-'', 1 ::-A:j ,.--__-_-: . 1 ,. _,, ; ,•,. .:.: ). , . --- . , i s LI--- ,, 1:,.,; 1 .....,.../i• , .-• 's\ ; ,-;„,e- •-•.,--1 , . ! ,-. r....: , \•-:-:! _Li--• -...., . • .. .,2-- i- . - .,•,-, , .••. •• ..•:t•! , •• ' I ' • \ ' ' --• ‘ 1 •-• 1...4( •"t.' " i I ‘ • ' .•• ' \ t' \s ----y t I . • ;. ; -, ..-•-"'''...- 4-- .1•\,, 'i •4. ; ., .,• f`" ,••• i ' 3 : :\ t - • 1 -. (' .. • „. ...s.,\ • • ' ,• „.0, f .‘ • N- •''r: i - \ ; , • , •• / i ' , t .§... • . :•-•-!,.,• i. i ' 1 ..., ‘ •t• ' I ‘ ; ' . I -••••_, .... • •-I-r •',---. . \ , • / .. . .,' •-) : \ c" ,f-Trr-'1.,'•• _•-.... - . , • - ' -., , , ' ,..L._../ j ! , 1 i.:),,', r- ...., -1l _•...',-..•• ',...:.---•••••••; i -•,, ,, _. ___ . ... .... . ,_ • •r . ,I • ,..... r t •; / ., • '•• 1 • ..• , ; • : \ ;,,. -. •,, -. - •-:.? ,-;; f,,, '..\ ' • -- -• - ---. ‘, IV' • •1 •• •- L. . 1/ - •\ \• , ... ....:. .., \;•, ".---) i ,r..f., • ;;\t" ,:--•--•---T,. .;',. ; ' ' . ;i'-----;.._ % ; • . :•-• .:-1- - ••• :. , 1 ‘,, • . -. • ,'-`';;:'1,1T- ---- ' •-• ; - - • - •• • • • ',.-...- 't. ' I - I--;•' • : , "''2 , •.', ; , ., ..,..1; ;"A - -••-I,-47:1 ? 1 i 1-,. .• '.:., .,.. ..-.„ f • •.' '‘; 1';i • - '. •',' It • • •• •' \i'-'il. ;-4 ‘,.. 1-4--‘-•! .1 ; • I '''' •:- "'t ", It I;• •N . ,•\ ••-r 1-•F" 'r' ....., ,,,,- . . •-i... j I,.-4---1 i F....... _„...,•, • i . •• . .1 ...,• •,.1,. A'., - .l 1.,U ,•' .',', ;,.Ir:: _.1 -I .• I .y .1 ._. - .?...1 ,'..1-, •••:•;.. '1 .:• . - 1 1: 't7 I . '`..•-•::: r• ;..-- t:1 . A,/''":•;IL I ;:t --1.-•:=:,4\,,__ - 7•\,4 ;:tA... .:- -.1 ci.if ...""(.. 1.• ' i - '-1 . • 1 4' i . •'. ;•,',.,, f- •. - ... 1,... _./. ,:!.._.r .,,-, . ,.. ,,...,,....,,... 6 • '' .. ( • ..$ ' •N •`....,, ry • 'i.I-•,-; ! • 1 .. '`.2:.. , \..-'• 1 • -I----•..‘, . ,\ .I 4 ,• \ 6 • in 1 rt,! •.;1 ' •• -I •••-- • ' . "1 • I • 4- 1 ,.•C',' tlt ---pl-L---L.-•1 .-- i .1. , • — --i • ;, l_.•,_.. ___:1 • ..•: ,•l`.•-...,\",.. ...... .; -.....c....1 1 - t.' ! .. 1 \ ' (--:"1, .-1,--1'- •- -t. . ---r a, '`.1'c,--;:./....i! rt—_•„,?. ; l I \,j '• ' • I, 1,:t 1 : • .ir 1. ...• ..% '. I.•-•-I.,, . .--I- f •I.; -tts;.•-•-:17•1,--; •-------.-. -; , -.. • • , -; ' \•1" ' .,,!1• .-• ' ; -s! - r•, -4,-; -1 \ —1 1-'...!••; !/ . •Li. s:11--Ne,111-11 ;---=`..' .' --1 r- ',: ; I i ss , -IT.T. 1\ r : \‘ • r-• • `ty %- i- i- .-.7>i • -.., - • . .'• I -, '..-,I ' I;.1_,- li ././i.-'.;.'_.:;• •;,L1,...• i \ \I__11. 1 „ 1 ..4..._.1 ..!_4,'IL ;;;/11,,......j.-....1-?..;i'...(..._:,__L:.......-....._. _l_v . '.....,-L-•:-.1-;,-- . ; . I 7 .,I,• r t •. ,...,.r-.,..,, r " - . ..„ •-l-r-....- • l• i . .:. / 11.t.r!'-,>.fr,' i ..------; 1 ! -j 'I I ! 1 ' I .,/ '''' ..'"• --- - '-' - !.`_ :\-i--. , '.." ----'-'---. ' .7 I 4 ./7••‘i.---- --- A .. ;.:. .--. A ; --I ,-- -- - : l \., \.--i I 1.. 1'1/ "t'' 11.4. .i>'• 1 A t -....., : •':',4-•:.- I- ti.•'.• , ,., r 4 /i'l ' ''"''.\:V.•':*':'' I. „.•L''‘'.....'..'., VA \t . "i- I ! •,,.., --i-: ;...„ ,-.--( -- • - -.. ,i,• ..):,\- • i.. .,.,_ .....„.,• •.,). . •-,;- ' i•- :.-..1---•-••/ •,,1.,--; -., :--; ,,, •--\ . ;\-I ;).,--, •\ ' .. -., ; 1, pi • \ - ,---h•. 1 E.'• 7-'•=‘.7.' ' -•'-1-'----- -f21 •I • :•••- - 7 - ('' ., 'pi ,_-,,i,,,.:•. •.......„( '•-•_'•;'-; .; • .----. jrk i•-•'. \\ . " ' t, 1• - ,.„. - • r----',..I.,j .-1 I ` - ... •;1.;; J-): -.1:1\ , .„ ..1.1 .. .. ,,,. ,.„. . ,,_.,.. .. ,,i,i.i.,- ;: ; ; •;- -, ; ,:._.., •s ... . • )4_1 1 iiii--,-..1 C ''',....:j"-c:f . .., . ,. il - ,.- - ,71-• •.." . '.1..'t • -.E] I___.-• ,,-:. 'l-:-1_.. ; /,\ \, .• : -—L-_-t--,-: •r`..;,'-:--:—%"'._. .\x -c- .. ., ..,___,„_. . . 010,.„.), . 44+- -,...--.. . ;.-, :.._.L,.. , \•2.. •, ; i ;- •,,c..;-• - ----77:".:= 1)t.'f:',-iii_, .:1\,.. , .. \-_.- L. ',. .4. A: (-7---I;_.___-..., "t.,_•• •:; ,.... , -,---f--7; -' '', ; IV': 6- • , : (Trz•:-•,•• -;'.‘--7 --§•:':. ...-, 1,,,1 e; I . ••:-..-. .k. \ 1 --'\•.,),-/,.:,', •;•. s•„•,,q :1 ,F.;;;.;. N :.0.' Ts----:-.--_ I, .,..,- ., !.. , .`"1,,,$'.,„•-•,-. z--'",\ 'I__::- r., : iLl' . I- II ' 4 . :1..) .-t- (-lip- 0! 1_;••,-,-;z \t 1•••-.... •ss. -, 1 '1. .`r,..-1 3-i--,Di r* . '---• ,•,' E -•__II..., •-.4 '._-fj Au 'DY :"'.111 •-•••--) .i-i;I--.%.!.......-.'; '.''i . _ r• - -1 i •f •-.I-' •- :i_J. ._,1 .1-\-d---1--.1 f 1 71 V y• 1.71.\11. '• _ . :i ... -"9E1"' -1 ' -... • 1 i . 6-, I.) •C3.• 1 ',. 1 ' .i-- \%;--;1 ;`,.\- ? •••:;-,- - --,---- • , \ --'•-••=------1 - ,p_,.•, r r. •..: 1 '-'-e,,\---1 . ' -1-1.'1* '' -;-• ',-1 ,\I•'- •• <-. -- L . ) • . .N.. •' . "I- - .'-'.,,-- i 1:i ....;,,,,, 1 r ,>, 1 i if _ _JI , • '..t.-r.:: 1 1 , , A ,• 4, rt.' ,.'•-'1 -L-• ' 11.___.1 t 'ill-1., ---,I,' I •.--q1 01 1 .\ ..'7 . 1 _1:_. :l I'...-•" ' t• LI, .: --- . • .1/;',..! ..‘--,•'‘. ,:e:: ! I I.) •-'1-- - i :-- - I -I / i 7 !;, \ I '' ; ''' ''1'••• ' ' i ' .) -, '....:... --:"..,-e -4,„ .•..il . ..i 1 I /2._./ -;',.-• /4 1-7"-- ! '--I .1-1 ' _ .. - --.. 1--..f I s'• • '. , ;'• Streams and 100_ ...... Class 1 Dtiwarnish 4 ..(, ._._.__.__. Class 2(with salmonids) Year Floodplains Class 2 (perennial;salmonid , ' ." .• - -.....1, use undetermined) SCALE.' I„ = / HILE Class 3 Unclassified , • 1, . _ • • • •i., •' -‘1.''....r,..• -. .,,,iCi•it'. , :ii, ; ,, I ' • •. .,.... • 1,\., s. , • . .... II:.', .. • . 1-4,-..t,..) •--_:1-.. -•'• ..f..,.• - •.t..... , '•,---.3-, /' ' •1 ' -1411Y'l. ., • • : . . "- I -- '' •• - - ........::.___ • ' .',.',; ,.-. ',, . • ' • -------- - ••• " - •-•-' ?-••••••••- - • • ' - , • ., „•••••, •".:;,:,...1 . • .,....., k.) !.....,_ ,•, ., .,-,,,,.._ „. 1 r: - •• , 'i•• • -IP 1 :--.,1 , • ‘. ..•• - • • •-,•••-- •• , , , , , • • . -;i. •:.7 \ --..,-.-0,, . :1: ..• ., -•-•--t-z,--. • • •/,'4.- •'• •*,-` -,• s• .I'.-' . ' )•' ,'•- '• , ' ', . : A-Ai ''', -:'t)- •,‘-• ..-..4 V --:',`•,'`-, I‘.4._,-..!?:-_,:-.. ----1, '1'.. \‘. .i 1.}-, . ' '/--..-s,• .•-i i-7-;',4 •‘••• -.. 4-;...; •, •.\ 71 1( k,(V V, tO,..17,--- ' • ‘.---1, '•-.'.'''. ! - .j' . \ . !•j . • `II .' 1,'. ' •1.1'••• •-'A - • "--‘-'!- ' 1A,./•", A..• !A • /', -'•:II'. •k ••-13-\. N -._r I'r"--- '• 71--'-:;,•'---- , r- . : f,: ),I i ...-'• 1 . . - ;• - - --- - .. . : '. ...1._ .1 , i I ,. •7.- ', ' 1'..• ‘'.., ,- ,.... -,.•• / ...:, .;; t . I - : • • ;-- • .• • •I •• .L---il.,,-t;'1,' . .• r .• '•'- -,L...-ii -', ,-,, i: f* • • ••A ',:•.! ...••-•S,' •• ' 1 . 1 fi ('. I . • '... ! ; ; f... ... ,..-.. ,,, •..„- ._.• . II ) ---. I.— ,- ; . .. ..,•-:. .... •1 "-`-•,' ..-.••.. ''..',. -Vrtlhrj.k, / -•,-, I-1, t. i ! . 1.., i '., • ; I • -I _-....„., , •. . i .., ii 'il •,- / I ‘i:';): \ t 1 . .....,. ,.. I. . -,7 . •.i•A 1 7'. " ';',• , Z..\--,,::::-111.• 1 1 :1 \ .• , '.....! ..1 "' ' k ` ' .1 • •.1. --.-./ :• '..11/..,==i..11' , 4, . - '..": • ,, , ) 1 - 1 - k I --- ') !',,,'.i ‘.• ,l'(_1-.'-. •, r i . e.. .j V,' ..' •-•._-.•• • • 6 ......-,,,....., i4,,k,!,...,::• • f:.-'...4,e,- ...,__ ,,k; \- ., .s.,;i ".' 1' .,,• -,-• ...!,\•••• ,•• ,', '. -' )4{1;' ' , --- •r• .__.. j,''. ..- \ '''2 --...1":44:- • . " •T.:: '. , • , . . A .: k, . •- 'A ',.-- •:•--1 '; •r. 1, • . .. ..... , • •..• . • 6.: ! , ., ‘f.,...,-,,,• ,, (.. I : .' L • ',('-‘.-l;•; ,, 1;;;Y-' ' . .;. ' 1 -.• ;-- ; 11,''-• : ..." •: . :. i 1 ' •::_:-. ---:":=-..:::'(. r A/:• •••„.--::' ( • --,-.- ;1,.;,..'.._A 1,;„,;,).. ..I . ,r,_,__4._0 .1)-: - .•.,.,',.'..t.'1,, •:.---_ -,,•I 4--rti.___•-•••\ k,_,...,..-- f..,..r—,.... t.- ----I .) `—-- --• i . - ' -, .-- -...,..- . ‘,./.,., • ----$:*. ,:'` --, .. .. !...11 : • • ,. : ! , . i- --.\-."Sr--------, .:. \ \s;:s.,,.. • ‘.: \•.. .'.. .)-.‘ % - ' 1 • t‘ C,.. ... ._...2.. .-1 • ---:.4- •0 i I-rl k-r-....--- -i'2' --• • • \\ •••••itv v.. i i-. - -• - •,..,-N •,-;,;.. ; • . •,,•k•I, • :-\.: . „ , •• : -,, 1 •',, : : . : 1 .,_ .. '( , • . --, P-- --•-i .!-. , 1 • ; , , •v..... -- 1. . .. , ". ,••.‘ .. k \\,..,.. • . • . : \••,;•'-'11 ( '.... . ' v i r •' , 1- ,-1 - .,.•• ...„,, • I-. ) • :\ -..... ' I , I ,• _ -- • rf' : ', - !. , ___, It, ' •• , •• /,...-4\--„. ; _., ti-.-,-.-,1 ......,-:.,1 6,-,•,• ;• ti i-r:i-.1 •vit,,,,. 1".--1 . --j '4:•-t•,.: "•:•-- .3, . 1 , . .-:;-_--1,,,. , . ., : • ./.%" •:.'si 1- --:-, r*•.,1..!;'- : -,_ ii-. • 1 ; 1. I .—. ., • • •... • _ . . •v 1 e i ., .• ---. . 1.'•‘ /(f...--ill-V,'14-J .• : I ..- -- ' • I i l•-.. •.-z-,''-:•- '• . ‘. ..: !: '' ' .2.'•• . ! , • - ) -,'.i ' ! ''\ -••.--'i 0•• •'1Fis-m':i•:•-f '!!_ I . , , .. . - "...\ i .. . i•-..1. -1. . ••• '"-j7-"--, .1W-- ----. ' : --t..',.;...., i •,. '.-:: .\\:-i. :: .: . -r--::\ " '--.I IL'''• / - .\ I- '-`,,,L-r,',,i1--)it ; • • • - r- -1- 1 I I ' .- E -1: l I :, ; 4! • -,10', ./•-' •-'1-. .j.:;,...,'. . A '. 1 ; ,_____.). , . • • ,....,. , _ _, A.,• ; / , ' I • A .1// --,...„J:. ''. '.1.:21..::_,.:.-___ __ ''..k%'''-'':Nr 1• • 't`;'' - •N. •••:„,:s•• \:- ' .1, i •1.„ :'-' i:1-1•1 •--'...r. , '',"I V' • .,..:,/,' '1 r -1-"'".':""•1 ' • - ---,--: •- _ I -.I , . , ' i •,.- ( "" — 1 '., ; ! ' `i ! i ..-- --' I ..,T!-- -. - .. • "/' -------7:-. ,. r- -.,-:. • 7( :.;;'-17.;-'1..i 4 1)../'' ''1::-''''i: -' .v. -C-X) . - c.1 1 - I 1 ' \k' ' it • ...-..-. ,, 1. -,,, .-,,-..4..4,:>...;: ,• ..• -1i-, • .: .1 - F-4 Ai it i ; t.;.-.-E, '.\y- ,i- .,t'z. r‘'' .-- ,- ‘` • - • . If . !;, ,\,,,..,,.. .1 ......! '/\'':• 't . • . ., 1,/ . / , . . / • I 2 I f 1 r : •1-4;1' : - t ',,:;.... i./ I,: -,,,. . • l, ''• ",..,:,...,,,f. : I , '•; , '1 ,. •• \ Iv' 1 'I I i- •,. \' !I , . ..k. • i_,--r- --it ,.-- --- ..• \) ;:. • - • -•• - • -- --I -r- •‘, ' 1 ..,-.- . - ---__ ,-1-",..,":--•;,, __.•i-1 - ;;;---','1 _\:‘)CA,-\.., ...A-,,, ,‘,„::)",4 '-,__. . . ) I. .---H•'''. r..\-'•.:....:,‘?\, .,, ...e\1-____.... r, :_r--12}-,.--t-- 4 (-1141-• .•1,1-, ,-,-4?\.•'. --c_--- , N.?J.', • • -••••-A c`e> - • . . ' . A• -• , ' I ..•_, • "7--A, ---.`i I i'''',, ri-ri. •• t`..\\ : :-. , C---,,•.. " 1",N• • —1 1 I .•' .\ \h.-, A . 1. ..4 1 • • ...1 I. i r. ,. N.,\::\•.,..-,-.--...,,.. -... x !., t• 1 ,.: r-- •4, ' , - ' .-'''-', E.,'.1-ZN-)- -- ..I , -7;1 \.-,. ,.'`..-i-..._:'i") .!; i ! 1 ' . lit 2. '-'-. -1,1.'.i •.-\-i-•1.'-1-1•';;.:;'1;Yji'-''''''-.." t.\."".' •,-..,_.• - ..;.........• •,.:•.":„ • : 1 1,/-',. ,-•'jj'-',V1.1 '••-1-.-i• ;; 1 , 1 .,..rj ; -.-.---,.,•.;., . .t. I 1/5 II I • 1: :Fil._ ../ • 1) 1 , --• ;.• , - - , .--;.'77 . - --.• ' . _.1 .,., 1 o • • 1•• .0,1-'? ; (1;r: • Ll .\'\i' :' ' V.--- . '''' '.1 . 7 AtA4- - ! ' •.-i ' c--k 1 /• • '-•,A I-1 \• ..r.,_j..j1. ii.: _ . _..:1.. i ! . . t. . • 1 ••, :, . ., .,,,,, v„.., r . .. •‘ - \I .:.:.•—c.,<••,,,..:. 1,',,,j : ‘,1(11_2,;" i[ii:1 i,.",• I ..-1-.. I (\ 1- 7 --, \'' „is..• ' 't i ",. .. . 'i i• . , , • ,.. ,_..., >. i' •- , , ---1,.. V (. . ' I! L. .I 7--- -1 .L... ___ J . : •i , , , ' 't .... 71/', ....: ...1. \ ,,.. ., , .i . .,. 1 A -i " I ' • C .. ,-./.--- -- . .- 1,e. ... i, 1 .1 .,. ,,ritil-___ -(4;''. •.• Duwarnish 4 .„. . _ ,.i•--„7-'... „ SCALE .. / = / MILE ,..., . • • • • itigh •e;'...• c+� }tlY4�! ,r !1• •,ij ,▪.._f:. 1 `:• • Met•cer Sl7.)--. ''�. 'L ,'i, v4�' yti:;,ff_,'5.;,!,•i 'r,il,-5S�^,'1., •fir • G'v;..' .• 1 • ,( .�� I W at r :. 'r ;i, • !t.. lit`' , ,'l L y. :' F .•' r )r t:1 I ' 1> l' .Lake ' ,� t ri�-j'.^�.#?�;:r la,�.-! ` .'il:. may. • ' r ;, ,. tt: , ' 1: : • H y}.41(� • q...^tk >e `r :ek_,.. a -'East �1 .�_y am 'J.�L .`"�12j, 1 l'b Y ! _ 9aAtmalniah • • ( • • C0&croak 4{1 i 11 ! G 'r.�,}r .. _ ' }} I ^ ;.;' r,1,Y,a1' - ! " •wA ` 'is .. • Lake r.•-,i.pL << • 1 h In. o i _t • ::,.;?a.:%� .• fir. : a • : • Washington„ n:, ( i c, ' '64.iI {'5.� �!;dSv!,;.V' is .1 _, r ''' • l. • -.;Y:e 'fi • �':RR;;:_. .;v:x_; r.; -eke , i - 1:• • , ` ' E•µ;'- •?fj•:r ' E, .J - �,rj :a = v :T3.0; 1in. y,; i S. ._ • rJ `7:'- . May Creek 11 - .1yut,.�;�-^,•'•, ;r � ��r I .., 1 � \(\/ .. _ cif! a.,� :�%'�,d� :�:�','!;{. p_,:•• - ir QX•As ▪ �'Jr:2 �- �'"'i7'f* :;.1.",•a• s t• 'av _. �;�•:f ::r; :_:. _ 5 .`'%y.:."itir:,'I - .. $ �j�.•fir,.; '-�,�;,t.7:. • ' ;i, : rim • ' . ..Washington' �. 24b 20b. , )' •i _. : 23b 21 b • • t, • 1 • 22b �: •\ • i ,; • • . � •:?3 / FREE R • �`. i I: ._; •- ; •--A ;� �, AWN .;; '�_'. .` }_ Lower Cedar River..__ ' - \.../.... .1 .. . ,--_,-1.-.: • •,,, _ • ,a, .• • . • - ----, ,-z- - ,----.- - . tit ,---. �k. .�^.-" . . .. ---• - • ...— \•� • • • ``. ;�_ i 1 :.t 13IackRiveyr,-;•-1. •`\ r - ;reen River; i, _! i. is 1 4') 1t� • 17 I //' j i t I '• '; :� ' -;�1'�j i i • J t ,,I i I I'- 1 4 1 i I .' L. i_ _ • 1 Soos.Creek 104 2 i. ` 10b. • i • Y 1,E' . , -} . ... Wetlands U11W�3fTllSfl 4 SCALE: /ii= / H/L.E _"`� Open Water ; Basin Boundaries I . 1 - Sub-basin Boundaries 't: • . 7 -• -. • 1 , • 4, ... .-;T--,-r,...: ,. s.• ii:. )11 1 - L i ./- _•.[ ! I I.!'•A i, ' ::,7.\-, --..) .1 ....2,- '..- ; w 1 I ct f tw,l, -'• .2..1,•••••i i.. )I.J 1 ...:--- , -• ".'•... i, LI::. -I,; Ir:-,!j/ ''." ''\'.1---1'''..;III .; :-,!-•.-i-l'r -`--„ -i.;./-74-,!.!.!-!• . 1 •'!'':'•1:„!; : •',[- ''‘ s, ':/''.'1'(...-,• -‘:7, :.,...'• ' -„.•!•!;! •!,:----:_, ,••• .277:0---;-•1 ! 1 4,11 I! , . '-:sA.-- - '4'•••••- `; ''. •!. t,' 1.;-`.:',.•.; c'\-11-1''\'7'- :'... •-1(L,,--- , I- I --,' I I I i • '''. )' .1!. ' L(i \ ‘./..- '1 t'r , , T.: ,..'. k, V I-1 • ----7 1. :• ! , , , 1, „. •,„'' ; t \ --.1.....1 ii/ .2 _ •.2) ,1..- , . IS '';' !. ' .‘1,. ' \i • 4,. 1 '"f:-.X/ ,-.;1 C':'' IV . ,,..; -r•-•,-'-%.- ' : . A,-,, ,•,'",•i.--.., .1 V.,I.t...1:,.: ,c . 1 'A 7.1 c' r4r;." "- ..,1,..-n : .., 1. • .1 -:,A )‘' ‘.- i -'-, lt•14 ..--:' : T.-,-1' L •,-,'.s'v ',••;-•,,,J.:_•:__ -.-k:.-L--,,.‘f>-- • ,' . ' ' )%--11./7 ',1• ,.1'. - /4,,,V, !„ 1 •,..Q h\-, \,,•t;4:-\. .1 '.,-)-1 i ---.----:--\ .('-,\---4 . ,.. , .,,,,, ,, . -•- ! /)• ... •:- • it:' ‘-1 2, , : -- I i:,---1 \ •• ..y ----- ..--\.1, .''.. ;. 1 ; Ili. ,,,-A : ., •, -•ir--:_ 1.e...,.? .//•-,',,, ;,..- ;-.. :L' -... i.„:.i.- •••., -....;------ r:. , . •....,,, .. . , . .....1:.7,.„.1 ..; !,,,./...1... -i,,/,' ., ---- 1 -.- .... . ,- •. . • \ - •/- -,,' • -.. • / -.7:.------ •t, . .. • . i....i.,..J ... ,7, (,-' : i_...:-:......-,....) \ i...c-,-.• \,.;"\L_K.vi..k; ..• • , .. ,-il. -1. 1--'-i-T---'f. 221. t i r-i----;-,1----. 1 •--• 0 --, ' ' )''', ; VI'''; f 1:-.--tr 0( '1}. - : ' • I '!-, 1:•,'.! . '• I ••••.-i• ("'„ '- .-.,'.1 • •.• . .- • '•/-+..rf -I----i j'i ••k\r-, • fi !, J %,: ,, ..1 \1 ,1_,.. `< ' -.:),.4. ;;J.....,-- ,...; f... .-. pf.-.---] • .,- 1- ) 0, , ,-,;-•,,,,-..., ,..., rs.,.;:‘,1) ) . 1, , , ..,,) _, ....: ,..i.,.„.). L. ii-, ---/ 4 •.„ .: .„.. .P,' '. c,--,-T-Y:_,,i-i-fl 17:-i --(1-.1-1,--. 'S. - • .. \•,,1:1 1 1 ii-----i-F-;,,':j"-'7-•:.`i e.:i r-S-,"•,--.-,- -______, • ....., I.4,7 t••••• . ;•/•: l..t ,, 1........".. , / C1',. •- • • •----.••,..:•y•• ‘ '••••••.„, -1•.!..1..,J... .-•-••-•-•7'---•'-‘yi 1.;1-r•-,71 I i---,-J I) , )),,L'•,:!] .!-----•-•• -1.1, ..-\j i ' . '',,.j 1 ?-,.,..0 *-----' rp, •.01 ` i (r" •i• -,/j'if'-',---L-%--j .-.4' ''ii.--_.'t, -V.'? . . ' -) ic .1 :rs4;...1 -,,/ ..4.,• ' 3-.., i•- -- - :...- . • ,---I •-f- 1 '-Tij----r/ •/' ..-:-.„4._,,.+•‘-_-2; !;,. .. : ; •': ,... i i'...,-ti 'r•:-,i:'', '‘-• ‘......,..,:'•:s 2\:.4....-"yz-_,-__:.../2" „•',.S.,:_",::/2,‘:•._:_:-i.:_..:E.•7--.1.:'F,-'_'--:i4r'•rIIti•.i..-.:.:,•,J1--\-\- ..-311t•:--'."•--.•-..1 \L-•, \ .,.c. .•r 4...,. .•, • • - '''.. • '--I•-•i•"•,':, '. •rr-'417:-..-24- , \__L.,,' CI.:.!• L .. , . • i 1.F.,112,1"*" • • .4 1, ,j). • .)..711-1-----Li-' ril, .•. 7. :-- L ''' . .-- -- ' ! .1 • -77;------‘:......1-- -1,_:42_,....-„,.-„r1-! ,',.... N7-.• -,'• : 1•'•-• .i-•• -‘-k-----'.•-1 - l'•-j '-'\. .. • :'..,,i,:•..,- Okri,r, • •&'• . 1--i'l• ! 1.--r- r,--..---- ‘‘' '--..,(-• .1 , i,rif • .-21-1 "\.. . . .`..•' iTi• f' s\ , . • ; I.! • !j!,1 r----..„-, 1......1..1-1-2-=-_, •-.: ,i . ,. , ; \ . : r ''' i' •'t\sf ! •-.."77.:7".-.N,.. ;', • 4-.•,--i,-,-• 1--'--"-. - - `kk -1 ---1-1.-L_r: - ';' . -:-,-...4 1 51 I 4 . : • , .... ;; ,,•J, •• -,-• i ill-:--:',''-: t---'. I. ''1-c---, .: .. • ' -_-_,=1-- -... • --- 1 -- . ' .,;--.1.1 .i ! -s-- '' :,7 rfl' 'c. ,-• ---I-LN : -'1 y7 • --- - - • •1. : .,-[):. • -•---,_ __;--,f-1_, r ,_,• \ L ,_ - : • , ._i_._ •e„,... : • ,_.1 I.._it .,,i.,_ c. - -Ls'.r.:-, •..--_,---...,.:;-r- ----`,"1-1THis ._ ;:_.. ... . . z . . ' (> ..:1,-,- - ; ,' - • ,- -i : "..1:... r9T7.7.1 1 ' 1 ' , _. „1. - .1 . .,•1- .. (\ -\ . • ___,k ....1..i, f.17-:=A . . __-__-_______. ...T. ) :. 'N., i . - = ., • 7 -':-...--10,• •::-•.--',.•i- -- .- - 'A s 1 !•,- ,‘ ' .; r---_,!t-riii,i, s:' .---rr--- _ ._•__- rl- L;;_•„-- -, •." i !---- t=---- -. ,„-,, ! i: !..•El- - f !) • %,". It.-t-L-•;\ i', :4-41!!:;-..H,4-..-J i,,.._i_liT -2_.. _- ' -.- i.--..- I -I .....,..,,:...,E,f_....4..:-_,._,...ri_... \,..1___,_..., L__t_..,-::;_._ 1. -.,1.-;----:,--T, -..1. " .-.. t._q ' i. 4(1.. .-• ..(-....t_-- ! I '•• ‘k,• - -1 \' . ' I• .‘ ‘11 l'.1. Li - __,'• „\l\--.-'1••••sl ' . .1. i' *ri• i--I-NY-11. t • •' 1 1 ! ,,,, •\* . -I. \-:.„,,_.] .1',. ..LilLi-- _ iv ....74_LIT , .' !,..7.1... ._2.414 lit i . , • . ri..x.'.-7:...,-) 1,74._ ) • -1 ; ' ... . I::I ,-. . :. .,,i,„1,ri. .... '..k ! . 1 , -1:1 1: i-- r i..., • _:,- r_,-1 (‘ •i . , 1- -tit-,.--,Ii...; ,,.,-,_-, i ,-, .• • l• r- • 1 : _ ,. _. .._/,,, -_.. ;.•.,..tl•d_____ _•. .1_+_i__ _ _ I 7 - . ...4. , I..\ •"'"••'"..--r-----1-rsC....'t,,, I-; -2 , . /.\.._ I •-o - . '-- - ..;-../..i.. .-.,••,'--- i s---------i-r \,---- -‘• • „ .1... •• ';•,:o. . . ./.'... • '' - -'-' -1 1 I 1 ii -3--i-•- •I •'rzT(--7-- . _ \`-,-..-,:::--.---- --- --`1 .t.. -. ••-.I , ,„...- ../ ./,• f' ..•,. ...: ,..:••• •rK .,„ • -.- •. •k-- ' 4 ; E-,!.. 11 1.1-.: •••••_.1.,.;••k.,r) : -.••• ' . • -4.\',j-H 1 fr ,-----, 7 I ',Jr,\ '••t\, , •- Ar .,, -,F,f. .;._ • -,;.:,._ ." .....:,..., s- . .. i. . . .1 1._ '-:.,-',,...._..1-..1 -2- ._..,--0\p'., . ,...-- ..---"--7 s' sal* ..si - ••4 : - -,-,,,-f,:.,_!,.:,_.'''' Np. i),-). :,.. . •• N.'. ,_. I i r .; • . '...',. ,.„ . , ... - „. ,. 1... • _ . - -•, • -.2.---- -----'-•,..- 7-•-•••r.------1 -'-' 4:.1 'it:_1. :1 I __ ..1 1, , i -\4i4, •, _ _.-7>‘,..,,d, -,..1• ,-,,----..- "7-• • ' -1_,,,1 '• -1 S r I ^,I ,.-r.,n'• :11 141 ,.._,..'.k,...;•;,,..,,:•.,..,.. r.„.,.... . \,,.‘,:.,...„..../f.\r 1•- -"Pr-,-,<T, -ITT 1 -; ------: 14-!---. • . J ; , •-I.N:47,--"'`...2- .11, \ . _"''' --t... ''.' ,;-.=-1-,'.- .,.. • • • . .. • . .. . ' .. . .... .• .- • ,..,.,, • --t....„. , .i...... ' ,, .. • . -- -I • 4.c :•:\ - - 1:-,--.•!.•-', ....--- 1.1 ...: 't-,:..2'--7:,--.. .:--". ... .7" ... •:-)ir''.\----(--, 3--. ..-...s.q.:1 , \ -1..c.,--;-_. .=7-----..-',.. • i• • li u , ii , • 7 - .. •I ' _t:-',/ii,• . I , >` _z_____ .. I .-:•\"-"-•.:-•-) i _ ..,.. --)r -' ,-'• : ..._-_- 1.• .4, . s , ,,). 4„.„ ,._,,...,..._._, .1.-1-) __,..2.--__:-:-.4,• _ .. . ,,.., , . . . - , . .._•• A.... • ___.i •. . . .• •,./,,, i*1 I 1-,..... -,---r--\ .:r - 7..------ .',.," 'CO ----)\,___ ..!• ..____ . I : : - -!,.. f'. • -• _L ; \ ,i'-/ y - ! \\ . '-).\- -1:1 ' • ,=-• -!) • •1'-' 0 tit] _ :1-r------ '7:-7 Lill VE- '''- 1 7\L \ •1•4-'- i'. -•(\/,' '` 41. A I t i __ . . ,..; I,j•._,,,, L .N.L1-_-_-1- fl. • w -)--y_ii.,,,•, ,c,,,, '-t'r . \I...v._ i _ Tt:...- ' 1 L'I I.': \7-- I il.\-:1 -I I _.... /•"/,-.-,,, \\ .......„::,__._--/ `..,w', \:-..-._ /-17-- I ..---.. - :-•'':': ` • -- '- -- '''''• --,,:- A -,.. • , .it • .- , - ., Seismic Hazard Duwamish 4 Areas SALE_. i" 2 /11/LE ..,•)5.„10 12 . . . • • .,?,;.,,- -, .,--p-T; IA. .'..: 7,(R\.',..,;-'-)) "'-------. i ! ; I ;v:1-i,1 ''''' i_l_r.:•'.-L:-.:1.. .''"21:/: 1 1 1 ,L-_,!_ •!?' '',,' 11' ,.tk A.' ; \. 1 Y.: .-s.'.- i 1 :- - t t i,,,f ,,t -71--i. 1 1:1-_,Z- ) •-/ 1_:!? j,LA..1k.)„;-;;,•;,• t-';.4%: ' ' '..- -'..\ •;* -- ' '. --•-•- '1. /-• • ' I ;; .', :. • .1 i '1".e.,1 -..Y.'-'21..._:-r\ :op,' i :),; • '-• ..,' k '‘ \ \,...2,/,): .,.i: , _. i ). .., '1=4","' !_.;‘; ' -7.. % ) i iii.tril I' 0, \\‘ .,./,. -. A -, i-`•i.I- , • N..',...,,--_. _ ,-- -ti. •__, 4 , ... I ,-(...r,.• •,--•-k,:. -r.--A' ••c' ' i A'-1 F-(1: ..:_ • ... ;\1_4_, _ •,, .\\ 1.12;-iii') •' 1-`-. • • - •--I.. ;; !', If .1.....:),..r, •• ....,,,,y.r.1_‘.,v_... .,...:1.\.,,, --i',\:--, ' * • :/,, ---'-•-) 1' z_1•V_i , ,. ... .-2--_)_ • A-)\:- '';r1,7 -; ; . _ y -,7.- - i f,. .-:,o........ . •, ; ,i :-, --1...Frr, ; •. . . , l' •k-s-1 1,', r.,‘, )Z‘.1' .•-.. .1../4:::•.---- ., ,... .• . _;‘:• ! ; ' p.:,.‘). . ... ...• . • 1 • ....'A) 1--,-..,,.1 ; t.•NI '\,\ ,\ . .,' •lc.) • •-• . • -•-•'.: 1'1 • i.-- .____;_i_V- -,;"'-..' .-1' . X\.. % . ,:‘ l'i ''•-•:, .'I ;•'d ; n ••':•, r..i1_ ..- •Pcir • i 3•i-,---(•\: :-, •, .'")6. /A• '\',:....•;•:1?;I l..,`.• - ; ''-z'\>'cv), •'''-,-• ' ,: • '.,)'• .• : ..-_-.-:..• 1,..1 .-. • • ..; ,, •.. • a.., i ,,,,I • `1 Li/1'T- . /,,, , ' i :._..I;... ,') \ 1.....-.c._', ,- ,'' (,-.A ••-tc .,. •( . I• 1-- / -.,.. -d. • -I - ..t.._...... . • i -')."-/- '1 . ,„ ,, •- • . i--c SI iy•.- .• V ,-, • i 1.) vi, r-Li._- 1, -7" , • -I. , 1 • ; t.C1 -•.•;•,;.. 1 ,. . - ... *, _.:,11,•-1.., , i•,:i, 7;1 i •;,A7:, ••- 7.-•,•••,-,:i.•,• Ur . ,-- -.7.1 " - .1. .., -1-,1...t s.1 , , c ...),-1-,..1 I• - ,---, r\.k \ • -. 7.-0,,-,,, , '-- . kV-,c1-1..l...,,..'... ,.IL:--?,.. .,•.'•:1/9----1(rC4-,..----,. --- _ / , - •k ..-- -. 1 .1->, • :-../4- 1. , ‘1,..,, ; 1 -„\..•_;',,,,j•:•- • -- X ")I ;'' :i' d ..‘ II i_ --'_••M. '----z; },----f' ''') T. i Ts-.'L_2; .... . !-----,...., r:r-, .. -4-. , , • : , . ,.., 1 ••••,,,,.) \ ) , • . N. . -- -..! •I* c• - i..) tu-. :, _ / ,,• ,_ _ , _ . :^,:5"i \•• ‘ • --i .' +--,- * '•-\,--------.11-i .:,..- ‘ -i•-. ::._ -, • .J. .,. - _ k,.../,•il • .f.`,.•• •.;;11'.-., . , . . -- • ' ._. `, \ 1 ..---., . .,,,,.-,-- '• ‘-`,..\ ,L., • ..1. . ::a.' r1.pj) I ' JP --.) .• ..., ‘.. - r• . :/ i 1 .1) ' !.1 1 -'-i.../../) \, ---'::‘\ • f\ 4 ..'•,; 1 „ :ii• i '; ,- ` •' \ 1• •:-s-1 I • I -4 i - .•1 \,, ..:',' 0 .1 ,., s„,. 'Y i, • ,--, V'• • -1• "• --\ • --t"-- ., f- , • 1 •'--;.; ' ....• ‘....] • • 6-1---.-.4L-,--.---,-. • . '',‘' .. 1 , La.; ;--__.. . •, •a,.- . ,r--1-7---,-.4- i . ......1_ ',V.•''• -1 • -•-711- 1, "N=-7.------477-:-T\,----c-_,__,,_...--., , r 4 ' s' /-LI I 1 •' 1 ‘: • --! • '--. '\` ,,. •.. I --.\ • . • '.,-,1 i' 1 '',•'•\ . .. :).! 1 - _ •'...1,-----,' •••._,• .k,' ' --:i:7-i -• !-:-.:.--r---- f •I : . I%'.: I, •:''i.r-1V•-•7••••7:7,;; • 41., .'Ii I , j_,1„1,1.j71;7, "..1''6,:-...17:24 . . ; ,..) • ...1. - \\ • F.-7 1 , . ,..'; i'..'•' .._: .,..,,,,„.--, % I I •-i - '• -. .' " ,•;, ,. '..: 44:).-' 1, . . •, . • -- t ', - :Li/.' (.. . ' '. • N, ...\\ I. ,•''•i 1-1........'''',-.1-7 i . ' .-i'---.-:'-',....-"ilc_i :, L.'-....i.'• "" ,,-----*.L., 1 , ... •1. I ; .1." --.-----.., . \'\ L . ': • - - N - t. :,-.. ; . ,,.i,.. L.: ..___-,...1 ....r 1 ,• ;. - • - ". ,. - , . . • _. .._. I..... .,,•...,__ ",-..-:•,.,•:-'...--• ,-,,,k .. ....'• ..',),-,.(•i,•Vt'?.,:-- i-•____ ,-! ft-b,) ',1,-2-4,i '.-41•.;'•I 7.-1. ,:.,. !-:I I- . - ,...... ._, . .._.. ',2.----..„--,.4-.1 :: ..,•.:,..,.! 1 --- -p--fr, <. _ • .A.3.." •'-.1 .-17- 1:i:-•;-:!::';. • ':.-...,- ; r.,"..- L4 i . '..; _I • 1.....' . ..,s7r-7.-1-1.-A;/ 1 . •• ; ' \i.• .,---1.....y,-,I .:.,.lc_ ;:-, .r___J 1-1--- '.• ' '..‘; 1,g i : _k• . TT-,..1 - , . L:t d..7.V.. \ A , \,:. %.,''t ../,./.-_-.141-1•,!,11..c-1T.F. !....--.,...L .-_ , i• 1-.. ‘.,,:. ...,:. ,. -,. -. - ... .-;---. • . 1 , •.ir_; _ e•-,r, . 1 • -- .t, .. ., .`-.• , .1 1 4 4,-.' I..ql- • _r-1-7-:'.-"•I' ---0....-J I, ..t.,. ,'11• \ , • • i,,': \ I •I , ; •-t71 .....-, \ t_, . ..i.- •. '. 4 1. •L 1:-r""‘ ';;,-...'''-i:."/ . I• j ' .f---,F:•i 1 •17-:--s1'.-;-: : ;I-- ; • i ,, .1 .. ,•- • • - j__ ...I fli •;--. -. •, , .,....Y.; .7-,• 1.. L -- -- __;; - I 1 ;. -.'z'.. `) ‘ -I. - • • -.'':' : -. %;••,- - ' r, ! --• .",---:. i _-•. N.1 ___..12 4.!:-,41,1,':ii,, ci.7.-L..,3....;.-...- '21.__.••!._-_..__,.1_T....,:......„Ur_ . ... __ 1.„.'1.i.1 :. . ...• •. ,.-1• . „!-.) .,., ,..., -.,ill t / 'f-4...• ' f• - -- • ' I -1---...1 1-i,...:7. (....\ 1 '-7--..-.--_. .___,L4..."-,.:',.,-''''''..;,:,1-,. 41 . ..r: .. ' / • ....--," ; ! --1 : ! : • 1 I fZ'',,. . .‘ a\ _.__....____-.----• --'---4--- \'''-'-.C.1:4.-4.:--- ', Z • : I ; • -'- -,- -1:. -'. ...r:j , ;1. ; .../ . Wi''. . 1 t._1 .!-_--.1 ,.. - • • :i-' ..•- . .:,,.. -----,..., .. . - • •I: . Lle•I;I..i,e. , . ., !::-...,.... , _i• I •,*".,1t.'S`, ....,'.V. --- .4_12. ::.,)77-:ri- f- .1'.4'--$''.<.."4.-''ss. ..,. • r,„ ... •, ..„.., ,, 1 _---i)- ---1-1 -• i‘i-ciffrA,1 .'-. • 7-.{1.- : .\v• t_.4... \,.,-,• ,. . mow , . ., r--,,I.i , ,.. .. . • .i.--•I-., .1. -•,....../....: .!a:. •: , . I. .... . . • • - .t..-:1'r-r-7.1 :-.7 -i .1 1 , • ,y.... • ...41-.....---(c-..- - .• . '••• -,..._.....---,-...0 i i 1 ,;1 ..i ; ; _; .'; 0 i ---.• ',.: 1.,\, 1.; ''7 1/.. ' c..--.:.'•-- .- .---', 4.4 .s.-. is, s•,.‘" ' i. 1--,','N-s-N. •.,, • ,i:i..;:',„,; I:.1.11:„ .- 'Is : .:,_,-- .., •If.,116,-``i-,-','-iTl• ', i; ': 1 .5-•- i --ty\-11-14-4--H, \ . ir,,,,-., . • - ,• .,4 --- i, t k, . 11_1. , \'• \ i .;---. ,, / .:-t,-.. ..,,,-- .._.j iv. \. \ i k,. 1,, . . t---;-•...1 - ;.."/ ••(\• '• -- '1--.., . 13..•;..,--,..., ,,,,,, ,Al),- 1- .I : ':. • - ' ,I . :----- -1-7:4-. '1..-..--:;:11 i ''': . .. . ....N t-,---. .• : ''', •••s‘ 1•. _. I :..._:.\ \ •' .. '..•-•• u:----7.- ... ••-•cit.7.-:-, .1. --1'---•••..:• I,. ' '„._:\./.-•••>;:-_:::‘--__--,144.• "''' -1',•;-- • --,-, -ri.-) . ..st t i -.--,.:,. •"..1.... • ,. ...f.--"--7.1-71;.__.!,.t.'1,--. Hr1.1-,k. -,• , . •_;.. , • -\'‘:• )\ ‘-t).-4----' . -1- -t ...17 •••r\-' 'C?'. - -ri. ''' \ %I jr-X 11.‘- k*---.4/ 'i\\ ' A . ,...4 • ,.......,, ,....,, .T . •__. ,........„ ) 2......,__ . ........ t. . ,.., •._, • •,, ,,• ,..,... _ , ._ i.,..,. ,, • • r 4 .....,1 '''F•er-r...1.71., i ••:---.!.1• 1 . •-”, lit-J..,',;,., ',5-11.1._.•,-.- 1..Z.,_,.1.... -;,..... -..14‘.\ A, .. .. ‘__,-i•''' i i Ltd. •.... ,:• i, . --J . ._ _': .C.- 4 : ,_., .--- -. I t 1_11_11...( . '--1-2J-Ili .' i, .,-‘. .. -fIll• ‘.1f t .i---.1 i -''-, ..-c..-!T:",.\1.4 7 _,;.?- ?"1,--- • \ -; •i• ,I.,,.. .1 I t '',_.''':,)'-i '.....;,. 1-7-r- .,......!,•..-1J-i.,;111...'T'•ly: --- :-..-. .c,.,..:-.1,1 • c.1._.., . r--.1-- •4. . : -• - , , ; •1 1 k,e,'CC.: 1 . , , ,il .')I riT;1 4.-'',?,.• (.\N . n -4'1- (1' •• ' \'• i I i '. • I ' 1- .-'-‘1-2- ' 1 1 Li..;-.--i‘-.1 ••,••.i 1:'.'1.11_,_... , .--... -.,1.1. . .12 -11:1- .! II. I . ' t•L ! l' V-.:.r-'-'• , • t I, ---I. •• I;11,-,7:..-,r i- •‘-\I \\ S....14 -1 --.. 1 I -.4 ..1 i -_- , 1 t j•I ,, •ij :-.-....„:,1 1 ........7-1, 7,,L 'T 1 ..,,, , „, ..-.- - .,,... I?. i_i 4 r-• . •._, . .,,..;: ,!..., ;.' LI-i.,:.\\ '''.•'s, • ,/ ‘.- -1..L 'r)•-• - - rt.--- -=1. 1 1 i-. ' I ;•,-\ ---i0 a._1k /..1..:-' • , '1 7'''' I I 1 ,i i ,----._ .,------1-'--,-.13 1 \\ -• c_. ,-- -- --'--. Landslide Hazard Duwamish 4 Areas SO4 // Orr, 1 1.1 4.e: I ?.. I HILL- ..... ,-- . _...... r tAkt. .i f T .� ' '•tl':, Suoctall.ri. ismi �' :v:>,%< Ur , ��'�E I tjtgl t • 7 r KEi I •• /0 „1.* r : ... : ,..,....11 it. . d • ` • it Ago • • ".C_v4 ��� ,I / l I VIE ;;;;.: :....: = , NO *;.••• ....,-,1:•:-.:•: \\^.\ — 2N,jr,, c lver Az ..: �_ �; Ik�•..' I 'I • 'Iv• QTF )E N — 1t7.'�===.i . . . • ;BM,- r�/ ,"to✓f�.� -____,--._� �. , .. iii,‘„.....: ubsla'• \L. I�H e; field 1.1.11 I�l-/ '9'f'e 1 —'�- I IT� O :� Ii� vD ,• isr • .• 1 YAd010 - — —I S all BM .. ' '' • riolowl 17• • s••BeD ,--_,,g,'N._ r In y A.,•i.ar - • i 1 ii yi BeD y .. t ti: '��j � / 11P ✓ � i/`�\ �Cy5. 'li ,r \ \ 111`- , E .. ‘44i, ,:• s tf �0 p;p : I *, RA D 1.Tu Rq L� 7iR �r VA s :11�-t.)Z7-1 ' II • �a�a.," 4.4 • T /AV.:. :i.N. ..,... „.., 1 g \ . ur -- -- 4 t----\ --'''-a- - \" '' iiilli4 111111110 ilNk, �,, lir- Akk It olli 13 , I I el `;l I /�1 ' . .0 I \\ois,. AgCBM,37• . ur 1Ili i fit@ - tUrNI i ' I P A ----* B 30 M° •�l P�, . Sew pR1HE I , �, 1` 4I - ............ ._- \` G. 'r is- I -- CB %Ifti Ng / gs.til�� -fAir�'�� J--O- --,-- -O '�C ,j$Qit�i \;:‘ �e16I 1 e. .. .I]1lti Ago QOC a" / , :4' I Ur ! k I I tilix), .A. ..-. 411- ligt I1• E ! Pu i n��• i 3• ir. _ • BeC IL,«�Tratk �� Aii t ! -2 - j.. • So Tu z .:: 1 J m Sk • I I^ `V(� ® u I 1 • ;� .. 1�� ��i� %� IBM t 4� r25 -- /L5 HAP t=t �s 29�f 9203 C i t WO _Z_.i Sk I• .7.Y ti itii: • r:: �`� �r .alp'• r• %: :;,t �I- Mom.•. wts• (;. Ali I. So �• .i:T.,-1. .'. � _rlI'J/.A I!�'9_114:51i,.. r \jw Slit •. 1 ---- F. -----i, �'1 WO :P:194.1. r-I:i:::', I ' , . la: ?... Illi N ���. I. I �utAm•C_•I ®�mggi� If •• . '� Py I •.' ' 4�� •� •7 Am8 rtrrn•, . .I TASK 3: FIELD INSPECTION There are no existing drainage facilities on-site except for the ditch along the east side of the property. Runoff from the site and upstream areas generally sheet flows east and drains into the ditch. Runoff then enters the conveyance facility within Hardie Avenue S.W. which consists of 12" CMP pipes and catch basins. Water then travels southeast, then turns southwest within conveyance pipes along the Burlington Northern Railroad. Runoff then travels south where it eventually drains into the S.W. 7th Street conveyance facility which is approximately 1900 feet downstream from the property. The attached City of Renton Surface water Drainage System map clearly shows the downstream facilities. There were no existing drainage problems identified during our site inspection, nor are there any drainage problems anticipated for this multi-family residential development. TASK 4: DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESCRIPTION AND PROBLEM SCREENING No drainage problems were identified during our feild inspection. The downstream drainage facilities appear to be in good condition and adequate size to handle additional flows. TASK 5: MITIGATION The proposed development will generate additional runoff due to the increase in impervious surface. To mitigate the effects of development, a detention facility is being proposed for this site, and will be sized per the King County requirements. A bioswale will also be provided to upgrade the quality of water leaving the site. These measures will provide adequate protection to the downstream facilities. • • .. 5318 NV. /4 :...: .. E5-6 1� - Lii,id 5 9- .... r16.E - : OF R EN ToN 0w l6E5 CITY I. 16F3-1 5 ::_::_'.... SURFACE'.'167.E • 1 c 1 2 • WATER 495 6 s-6''" toTl.'p `v ¢:� :..2fid::St DRAINAGE• . .,• GE ... -.. . .---- SYSTEM 5-IE �,.10. . • •FQ� ' •..-,.: ;:.:. .. ti��s�N��l/-... s�f .16.C5- .'1675�q. ... l4F5-B LEGEND 14C5• ••' Te c 1 J V7 IQCS-5 6 14Dt-5 `6- 16E6-8 - `Kf5-16 • STORM SEWER -•-.. - f.... �- :.166-U D6r 16.D6' ".. ':y - 61.6S ly.5cy....:. •1' Ii ...4606-t0„ 2 y •� 6 •- .% 10 _ _ -L` •' -,-.JSH6- .�.: :: •'Q�i' �S f4Cb-� ,•16D6F6 . 16E6-6 _•� L .1 '. •...-ry. 1 D6 IL1 16!•6.1.-• • '`:,-..,.-^ �.• • c1 - µ •`14.,_- `14C6-S 14C4:2:4E6 4 _ _ - -9. --- DITCH LIVES 'h'.,.:ti ..... •'"„a -- :• • iJ :2AY.ryl+'v • - M.: : 16E • i faa�`6tt Y mod.-S -•�:� 14D6-1• 16E6s ::- .14G+22..: 16E6-2• i 14D6 t tst6 1 4 j Q .o-_, r6`I �36f6-6 CATCH BASKS ;3 Il 7 ..1686- t t73 :k,y V - t16E ` 16E6-19 _ - 6 © MANHOLES `%"`ro: A� /'� ✓✓!"� ":14E6 116E :16B JC1•,,/ `•.n,.•,,fav D ! �✓: 16E 14E6-13 'O� aS1.6_9 .'16B6-1.1 : "� '." ^•16C6-5 Gj �.%`, . : ail?, tAc6 :ye .....406-1u:' 4 DRECTION ARROWS prl3lw'7 +,...,,,••., '' .C;N> �':�r6;D6-r' /" \ wC6-u ..-., ",,..ry i 4 t6.C6. LV 14D6-1� % _ :--.. ,f•"� CULVERT ..ISM6-e 16%-2 . 7 {,' f _r 16E6-23 16E6-ia1 'i�f I61' V6JL�R t l 14D6-15 •'.r �- T CROSSNG 161.E-t1 9 C6 9`6 J �•. ;/ .} _ t .1427-1 vas-it ————_ ``,. , •^ cON CITY LIMITS SV Sunset Shed* < • c7� a4a7-s 14o7-te` �co 16r)-i 14s�-6 RENT r••l • 7 z r.` .,3: ...,.,.. ::s% l. „ 16D779 <'14➢7-N'l .0 _ Q �W '1687-10 t .ah 14C7-3% _w p . : .;> "-� W 16.37-9•. V t6C)-f' .,.••.�1 .. I I 1 `'jp ILD7i1▪ 5i:' .. •. t4f7-Q R • • 16.07-12 _ 6f7-19 • 16..87-7 -SV Ib•C7-3'.. j. �/ ...'1.D7-17 14F7-` 16F7-20 I . 11/ • Ibe)_S 1687-7 '`� _ 'i 16E7-9 r r q C . , " •,�...,._. __y .16.C7-6 - r1607 B ▪ .. ..6<7-3 - 16E7-8 ''t4F7-]� ^':•�• 160741- : 7-t. 16C 7-6 .. ._ 1 6F7-13 �+14a i 14B7-. 16D7-.Y-'�f f-^`+, ... t4f7-2 16n7-2 14C7-T �b ``1408-9 r %` .• ''.16f7-1' t6•E7-7 16j)-12 - i4e7-1 = _ •'.'16F7 ''-- 16B8-. 1468-1 `,.16CB-5 ', 16•CB-6 '`- '•.,4C7-1 4 7 160B- t, LIFT i ... 6BB_2 ..-;`.. ' D-7 9-6 1. 0-2 6C0-22.. ....... �' 14Ee-s 6cB-z5 DISCLAIMER S. 16c- •-_: -'....' ......—.",..,_____-- ,, 1 a-6 16.De-9 • B-24 - t6fe]o ', NVENT 7 NF TI F T STORMDRAINAGE SYSTEE . • -a(�r/; -• 6DI408-7 -i IS THIS T TIC G`IIY.�ITAVAS+CQQILED FR�1 NUIEROUS . ... ...2910n.. �... l6CB=Y"-'^••,-.__�.:*...•_:-' .........`... IT IS F AVAILABLE AT TINE. AND S++UULD • • • 1 iE Nor.t 6r B USEDOR BEST INFORMATION GUIDANCE ONLY. CITY RENT ON..-.... . 6Ee 19 . S T a. RE ON a fe I NO RESPON„1BLE FOR ERRORS OR 0/ImmONS. VHEN THIS • 'K' n �96Ce-z INFORMATION IS';;USED FOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES DESIGNERS • ARE TOFIELDVERIFYTHIS INFORNA ION. R.R oe ,aDe,a ' T • 14Fe-ii • 608-12 • • 36,C:7 16CB-B :6C8-9 ....:.:..............,.:.2N2-1 16 BB-3 16CB-7 16.OB-.:.�:::. 16CH-B 6a0-3 14C8-J 16LB-10 _ ' - ..16De 2 E 1. • _ t:11 17''.. :.e-.S.V., 1.1....-3 00 1 .. .- '14De-] \ 7�l£2 CB-21 16f8- 1 6j'8-20 16C9:l� 1152?19tt" 16.c:- • 3 If 2-2• •. N N :,s zuz; ::.:1:; 4 8 00 :: I/ • d ffI 21,Cz-1 4 .... Q 2LC2-. P .+21L2-2 O� , uz-1: � Q 1 • U 2LC7-6 2LC7-. a: .C. A J • c, ♦ ♦ P/B/PW TECHNICAL SERVICES . V a- /z1.C7 S, 1. : _ a r'2LCz-T 11� .. • f • �j ,� 09/23/96 Q 21e]-a t 2LU-.• ,-2LC7-11; • 5318 SW 1/4 N. 5319 NW 1/4 ` ******** * *******************************************]E******** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 12/11/96 16 : 09 Receipt ****************************************************•************ Receipt Number: R9606595 Amount : 1, 504 . 16 12/11/96 16 : 08 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #012458 SCHNEDR Init : GC Project #: LUA96-159 Type : LUA Land Use Actions Total Fees : 1, 504 . 16 • This Payment 1, 504 . 16 Total ALL Pmts : 1, 504 . 16 Balance : . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 000 .345 . 81 . 00 . 0017 Site Plan Approval 1, 000 . 00 000 . 05 . 519 . 90 .42 . 1 Postage 4 . 16 6►( • ( c `1 Golder Associates Inc. 4104-148th Avenue,NEf#a-61= Vvlder Redmond,WA 98052 ® Associ tes Telephone(206)883-0777 Fax(206)882-5498 September 27,1996 Our ref: 963-1552 Schneider Homes,Inc. 6510 Southcenter Boulevard,Suite#6 Tukwila,Washington 98188 `'` Y'� .,L ---' , ATTENTION: Mr.Ken Peckham RE: RESULTS OF PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL STUDY} �Vfr) OZBOLT SITE RENTON,WASHINGTON DEC � DEVELur�e,�; Dear Ken, CITY OF RENTON Golder Associates Inc.is pleased to present the results of our preliminary geotechnical study --- for the above referenced project. The scope of work for this project was contained in our proposal to you dated September 12,1996 We proceeded with our study based on your authorization given in the fax received from you on September 9,1996. The study was completed in substantial compliance with:our proposed scope of work We did not complete any environmental sampling or testing for this study. In general,the project can be constructed as proposed. Subsurface soil conditions indicate that conventional construction practices can be used throughout the project. The report text will first discuss the general site conditions and proposed project development plans, '- ' followed by the results of the geotechnical investigation. 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION The project site consists of a trapezoidal shaped lot of undeveloped land which is located in western Renton in King County,Washington(Figure 1). The property is located south of Southwest 4th Place,bounded by Maple Avenue Southwest along the west side and Hardie Avenue Southwest along the east side. The Plum Tree apartment complex borders the southern edge of the site and a single-family residence with several out buildings is located at the north edge of the site (Figure 2). Based on the preliminary site plan faxed by you on September 24,1996,the proposed development plan consists of two multi-story,multi-family apartment buildings with a total of 36 units,with an optional two story building as shown on Figure 2. Building loads are expected to be moderate to light and no below grade structures are planned. Asphalt paved driveways and parking lots,and associated utilities will be constructed. • C)FFIC'FS IN Al ISTPAI IA rANAr)A P,FRMANV NI IN(,ARV ITAI V C1A/FIIFN I INITFfI view nr'M I INITFf)CTATFC September 27,1996 2 • 963-1552 {! -i The topography in the northwest portion of the site is generally undulating and slopes down from the northwest corner to the southeast to a prominent break in slope that extends across the site from the southwest to northeast. The southeast portion of the site is generally flat. No site topography was available for this study. The vegetation on the site consists of a combination of open grass and small scrub brush with one large tree in the middle of the site. Dense blackberries and mixed trees dominate the east and west edges of the site. A creek or deep drainage ditch runs along the eastern edge of the site,parallel to Hardie Avenue Southwest. We observed several piles of vegetative debris,household trash,and construction debris at scattered location across the site. 2. PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS We observed several shallow test pits that had been excavated on the site previously as part of an archeological survey. We are not aware of any other geotechnical or environmental investigations on this site. 3. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION 3.1 General The purpose of the geotechnical study was to investigate the soil and groundwater conditions on the site and provide preliminary geotechnical recommendations for proposed site development and construction. The following sections contain the scope of work and the results of our subsurface investigation. 3.2 Field Investigation Our field investigation was conducted on September 18,1996 and consisted of excavating eight test pits (TP-1 through TP-8)on the site to a maximum depth of 11 feet. The approximate locations of the test pits are shown on the Site Plan Figure 2. The test pits were excavated using a rubber-tired backhoe under the full-time direction of a member of our engineering staff. Our field engineer observed and directed the test pit explorations, collected representative,but disturbed soil samples,and recorded soil descriptions, stratigraphy,density/consistency,and groundwater data on a test pit log form. Summary logs of the test pits are presented in Appendix A. Soil samples were described in accordance with Golder Associates Technical Procedure TP 1.2-6"Field Identification of Soil". An explanation of the classification system is included with the test pit logs. Soil samples were returned to our geotechnical laboratory for additional evaluation and review of descriptions. The test pits were backfilled at the conclusion of soil sampling and observations. The backfill was tamped in place with the backhoe bucket;however,some ground settlement over the test pits should be expected. Golder Associates I September 27,1996 , 3 963-1552 1 ' 3.3 Geologic Setting Based on our field observations and review of published geologic maps,the project site is 1. ` located on the north east edge of the Green River Valley. To the east lies the Cedar River and the west lies the Green and Duwamish Rivers. Prior to the construction of the Lake Washington Ship Canal between 1911 and 1916,Lake Washington drained to the south through Renton via the Black River to the.Duwamish River at Tukwila. After the Lake levels were lowered in 1916,the Black River channel was largely abandoned and over the years portions were filled and developed. The Cedar River channel was relocated further to the west to its present channel along the Renton Airport. Based on the soil conditions summarized in the following section,we believe that the southeast portion of the Ozbolt site is located in the area of a former meander bend of the Black River. 3.4 Subsurface Conditions 3.4.1 Soil The soil conditions described here represent those conditions observed in our test pits. Our test pits encountered a variable stratigraphic soil and bedrock section that consisted of topsoil,alluvial deposits of silt,sand and gravel,till,and a completely weathered to highly weathered sandstone. In general,the site can be divided into two areas based on the soil and rock types we observed.A description of the two areas are presented below. The soil and rock units we observed are described in greater detail in the section following the area descriptions. The Northwest Upland: This portion of the site encompasses about 2/3 of the site and lies north and west of the prominent break in slope on the site. Test pits TP-3,4,6,7 and 8 were excavated in this area. Based on the test pits this area is underlain by about 2 to 3 feet of flood deposits,0 to 7 feet of Till,and highly weathered Sandstone. The till was absent in TP- 7 and only one foot thick in TP-8. The till thickened toward the break in slope in the central portion of the site to about 3 feet in TP-4 and about 7 feet in TP-6. The sandstone was encountered beneath the alluvium in TP-7 at a depth of only 3 feet. It was encountered f below the till in TP-4,6,and 8 at depths varying from 4 to 10 feet. The Southeast Lowland: This area lies in the relatively flat southeast 1/3 of the site. Test pits TP-1,2,and 5 were excavated in this area. Based on the test pits this area is underlain by three to seven feet of flood deposits consisting of loose,silty sand. Below the silty sand flood deposits we encountered a coarse sand and gravel alluvium to the full depth of test pits TP-2 and 5. In TP-1 a sandy silt alluvium was encountered below the sand and gravel alluvium of a depth of 9.5 feet. We would expect that this deposit is likely stratified and variable across this area. Golder Associates September 27,1996 4 963-1552 The soil units are described in greater detail in the following section. Topsoil/Fill-Topsoil was observed in all of our test pits and was composed of a loose, organic rich silt and sand up to one foot in thickness. Although fill was not observed in our test pits,it may be encountered near the edges of the existing roads as part of the road construction. Flood Deposits-This unit was observed in all our test pits and consisted primarily of a stratified deposit consisting of loose,sandy silt and extended to a depth of two to three feet on the upper portions of the site,and about three to seven feet in the lower portion of the site. Alluvium-This unit was observed in our test pits in the lower southeast portion of the site below the flood deposits.and consisted of a compact,well graded sand and gravel with trace to some cobbles. These stratified alluvial deposits extended to the bottom of the excavations in TP-1,2,and 5 at seven to about ten feet Till-This unit was encountered above the sandstone in TP-4,TP-6,and TP-8. The till consisted of a compact to dense,silty sand with some gravel,and a trace of organics. Near the contact with the completely weathered bedrock in TP-6 the till became softer and wet. Till typically contains sandier zones that can trap groundwater. In addition,occasional boulders are encountered. Sandstone-The sandstone unit consisted of a extremely weak to very weak, moderately to completely weathered,stratified,medium grained,arkosic sandstone of the Renton Formation. In TP-7 the sandstone was extremely difficult to excavated with the backhoe at a depth of 4 feet. In the remaining test pits the sandstone was difficult to excavate to the depths shown on the test pit logs. The sandstone encountered at the bottom of TP-6 was completely weathered and behaved like a ___I coulpact,wet silty sand. 3.4.2 Groundwater We encountered groundwater seepage in TP-1 and TP-6 from a depth of approximately 10 feet.The other test pits in the lower portion of the site were unable to achieve this depth due to caving of sands and gravels,however,we feel that the groundwater elevation is likely similar across the lower portion of the site and likely can be shallow during the winter months. No groundwater was encountered in the upper portions of the site. The groundwater conditions described here are only for the time and locations described. These conditions likely change over time. 4. RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS Based on the results of our geotechnical explorations the site appears suitable for the proposed development provided the recommendations presented in this report are followed. The site can be developed using conventional construction practices. The buildings can be founded on conventional spread footings bearing on competent native till, bedrock or alluvial deposits. In the area of TP-1 in the southeast corner of the site,the Golder Associates September 27,1996 5 963-1552 l__ alluvium is about seven feet deep. We have provided a couple of alternative options for foundation subgrade in that area. Our preliminary recommendations are contained in the following sections. 4.1 Foundations Shallow conventional isolated or continuous spread footings maybe used throughout the site provided they are founded on the native bedrock,till or the alluvium. Structural fill that has been compacted in accordance with the recommendations in Section 4.5"Site Preparation and Earthworks"are suitable for foundation support. Topsoil or fill is not considered acceptable foundation bearing soils and should be removed from all building footprints. Foundation subgrades should be inspected prior to placing the reinforcing steel and concrete. The subgrade should be firm and consist of competent native soil or compacted structural fill. All loose,soft,or wet soil should be removed from the foundation area. In the southeast corner of the site where the flood deposits are up to seven feet deep i ! footings can be founded in the flood deposits using a reduced bearing capacity as listed below. Alternatively the bearing capacity can be raised if the footing bearing elevation is densified using a heavy vibratory compactor. Based on our field explorations this area of , thicker,loose flood deposits will affect the southern third of Building 2. Conventional isolated or continuous strip spread footings should be designed using the following recommended values: • Minimum Lateral Dimension -_- Isolated Spread Footings 18 inches Continuous Footings 12 inches • Minimum Depth of Embedment Depth Below Lowest Adjacent Grade Exterior Footings 18 inches Interior Footings 12 inches • Maximum Allowable Bearing Pressure Foundation Bearing In Weathered Bedrock and Till 6000 psf Alluvium 2500 psf ' Flood Deposits 1000 psf 71 Densified Flood Deposits 2000 psf Compacted Structural Fill 3000 psf (Min.95 percent ASTM D-1557) Golder Associates September 27,1996 6 963-1552 - _ These values are appropriate for all dead and live loads. A one-third increase is allowable for transient loadings such as due to wind and seismic loads. • Lateral Load Resistance Allowable Passive Resistance Coefficient of Base Friction Compact to Dense Till and Bedrock 350 pcf 0.40 ( Alluvium and Compacted Fill 250 pcf 0.40 The passive resistance values should neglect the top foot of soil unless confined by a floor slab or pavement. • Settlement Estimate Total Settlement less than 1/2 inch Differential Settlement less than 1/4 inch Rate approximately 90% during construction 4.2 Slabs Conventional slab-on-grade floors can be supported on compacted structural fill,till, }�! bedrock or compacted native flood deposits underlying the topsoil. The surface of the.native alluvial soils was loose and we recommend that it be compacted with a heavy,vibratory drum roller prior to casting the floor slab. To avoid degradation of the subgrade,compaction should only be done during dry periods and should not be done while the surface is wet or if groundwater levels are shallow. Any soft or organic zones observed during compacting should be removed and replaced with compacted structural fill. 4.3 Slopes The slopes located on the site appeared stable and no signs of slope instability were observed. We recommend that permanent site slopes be graded no steeper than 2H:1V (Horizontal to Vertical) Temporary construction slopes in the till and weathered bedrock can normally stand at inclinations of,about 1H:1V. Based on the test pit excavations the alluvial soils in the lower southeast portion of the site will immediately seek the angle of repose and will not hold a steeper slope. 4.4 Cuts Cuts into stable native site soils such as the till and weathered rock can be faced with rockeries up to six feet in height. Higher rockeries may be feasible but will need to be evaluated on a case by case basis and will require additional investigations. Rockeries can be used to face fill walls provided the fill is internally reinforced with geotextile grid or fabric. Rockeries should be constructed in accordance with the Association of Rockery Contractors guidelines. Golder Associates September 27,1996 7 963-1552 Cuts in the alluvial soils in the lower southeast portion of the site are not expected to be self supporting. Our test pit excavations in this area caved rapidly. We do not recommend deep cuts in this area without provisions for shoring and possible dewatering. 4.5 Site Preparation and Earthworks Site preparations will include clearing,grubbing and removal of fill and topsoil in all building and pavement areas. Native alluvium subgrade soils in the southeast lowland area shall be densified using a large steel drum vibratory roller prior to placement of fill to raise grade or final grading for roadways and foundations. The native site soils are considered moderately to highly moisture sensitive and generally are not well suited for use in structural fills. Under favorable conditions,the contractor may be able to place the native soils near the optimum moisture content and achieve the required compaction. All structural fill should be free of organics and debris and be compacted near the optimum moisture content. The highly weathered bedrock soils can be broken down and used as fill,but contain high percentages of fines and will likely have to be dried to reach optimum moisture content. Topsoil is not considered acceptable for use in structural fill and should be removed from all structural areas and used in non-structural and landscaping areas. All site structural fill should be placed in maximum 8 inch thick loose lifts and compacted to a minimum of 95% of the maximum Proctor value as determined by ASTM D-1557. In structural fill areas greater than three feet below pavement subgrade the material shall be compacted to a minimum of 90% of the maximum Proctor value as determined by ASTM D-1557. If compaction tests indicate that compaction is not being achieved,the fill shall be scarified,moisture conditioned and recompacted. We recommend that all site grading and earthworks be performed in the drier summer months. Winter construction will likely result in degradation of the site soils and result in increases earthwork costs. 4.6 Drainage Provisions We recommend that both short and long term drainage measures be incorporated into the project design and construction. The contractor should provide measures during construction to avoid the ponding of surface water on subgrade soils. Surface runoff can be controlled during construction by careful grading practices. Typically,these include the construction of shallow upgradient perimeter ditches or low earthen berms and the use of temporary sumps to collect runoff and prevent water from damaging slopes and exposed subgrades. All collected water should be directed under control to a positive and permanent discharge system such as the storm sewer or infiltration pond. 4.7 Liquefaction Although a liquefaction analysis was beyond the scope of this report,the loose to compact flood deposits and alluvium encountered in the southeast third of the site are possibly susceptible to liquefaction,during a moderate to severe seismic event. If requested,we can complete the liquefaction analysis and provide engineering recommendations to mitigate the possible effects. Our experience has been that multi-family developers typically assume Golder Associates September 27,1996 8 963-1552 the risk of damage and do not design structures to withstand possible damage from seismic induced liquefaction. 1r. 4.8 Final Design Review We would like the opportunity to review the site grading plan prior to finalization for conformance with our geotechnical recommendations. Additional field explorations may be recommended depending on the results of the review of the site grading plan. 5. USE OF THIS REPORT This report has been prepared exclusively for the use of Schneider Homes and their consultants for the specific application to this project. The geotechnical exploration was performed in general accordance with locally accepted geotechnical engineering proactive to provide information for the area explored. There are possible variations in the subsurface conditions between exploration locations. We recommend that a contingency for unanticipated conditions be included in the construction schedule and budget. Further we recommend that our firm be retained to perform monitoring and testing during construction • to confirm the conditions indicated by the explorations and/or provide corrective recommendations adapted to the conditions revealed during construction. Golder Associates has enjoyed working with you on this project. If you have any questions or require additional information,please give us a call. Sincerely, GO DER ASSOCIATES INC. ames G.Johnson Senio Geol gist rt L.Plum P. Principal Attachments RLP/JGJ/ct amJGJ1.DOC Golder Associates 1 • • ' " 9 Ems ; . :. -.._-- -_.., H.. b, :SI / i T 1 •. ae :tIst ri SC <FY - '09 ^l t_ a +. t ,z�i S'FxoMS.. __...'-•;Jia_S--.I -.'i.?. ¢< 'i, `,.i n'; -. : s. a <n:.v i i"�1r ///� .. sr •_ ,E 1.N! -•, ---,51_ -A B. '•`''• x -''KA:.: N•`•,TH 57 i L S,/ r:w s: `.S :c1ZETY cL4. .,_. <s' • !f>i ...11 8 >; I, � � �A , .C* I , J J a' ,/.,,'V!'N- MI HI :, _. rF: =5 ..t;• , a to to Yrx - -' S":.128TH` ST :@n�1 •Pi Iwirr�` ;T i_..(N'4TM'-a.._ sit �'x erx sr•®� n'R%'��A - -. . 9207 R I '; C '� 1-r- 1 z 1100! ! r !4° .o. s.s/•c s<>11htTx L'y '-Ti-.3s• ! 'w 7F7 T!.rr cc = I : RD i ct S ''m; E ,m .dam_. - ... -.r t z'x s� t oea.�+ �, �.�. ,, . 1 i t w, -!._c_SIL N AIRPORJJT 'TMIY ,`' \• :R to NI (G sr;y, /r' 39 ..2i i_up s , *15,1 ill S i TaLICJ! ;-,'2 sr I i �I NE .i - ST rn s E---:-H p N" s .r ,/ AN 2NQ ST ' i.�. . • _t S ! T06IN 1 rR; i ;�.'8 11W. .. ;•� .�„Rt r S, t .x. :' S . j am. !ST' /l!•'..r, °'E T� 1 1 . 5_ E. •I !` s�,lisscR1, 'W Q :xt..l,.5! \..•.o� ,o,,7. �.. .,E'f 7 ; NC I S' 134rkii' I i s., Vt .^ RENTON= rn 44.4,"1 rmt I ma i/T�, 'W3y',I > f i.,` 'gR4TE I ;�; d �S__1�7� I". .?c r,h 5j HS Q s •>/. Sqr� /[_[!IR\,. <, : CrJrE'rFRv a aE 44 4k� Si:ar-7 —13. S 2ND 41' 5. I'•zl "I"A i I I 5/ REVFR Q''t F r,, % d Cs`at Iw�:='�c3L1 Q _ ST_. „ 'A1 I, / ASK , I c z , 4 44 R,:. : ,•�' S 3RD �1 $T;'<. i°1 sin.," \` �S Nam"; • o'+ ® i _�;-'�-., .:1+ 'L I"�1 \sr 1 1 T.., dryJ'fi•. {s >a:e� -,---t i.iur J' ji (1, Bry m I;�R,zf ",_,, W'\s 3 _st j ��w`E7141 n ,5 !?•s B ',"I ego • y - 2r pit •,F_ 'i F I SITE ' 1 i1"—a m !— I \1 �= ..� '•-RR v '1� I Fr �Itza'sa i i as>I":'y_S E7H Sr I `�'�� Rl� I _ : i f / S;S 6Tx 1 6_ SrI ":.. __..-...�-...__ 5u •1 7TH : \4�. 5T s'�I Tr,�.�_ sr 1 38, s8} 5'�t 18 L . . .. .--- ,f'°- 8 IT1 ^ ":_ w :i< i /F/,P.0 Vey •� 5• <^� Wa-II 3RIL•E'.cj :•,,,i i ' Pl._ I -__ __.< > " ,, ^lp� _. .. ® _ E_•,475� PY.kt?P-_ ._..-.:p ...__._ ..._ I_ ... .... _. 1I 1 1 4 SW W/ S REKrrIVILus: y I.,ANt t 1,ARK to `I°a}"_...° 1 12T:'..:..S ..._.,. • rx74ENT VI'---"^_ DR EN-° s}, _, 's! • �1.. .CEDAR ON LI:.GE PL ,51:r.. • SW t ®:16TH ' .... Si SW' 2 i< $y�=Y_STx c:N/ <i i I v Qo,�'ri^,P ,;,CaMfIH St o-, 1 laoo 16TH ST ' "; 6S 16TH ST \ c,.5 8 cp..... � .- 5 1 �` • z s „ S ": \ z�,,,.T.J• .',\ S•PINTx�Pt_i;, B\f .1,_ .. gin•. �..._ L. S.0 /\' - - '-�;• - �. •"- i' it "' •'- '�; �=tx-S�=- g --�-; - ,�y`*� ,u:E . ';a��r-�-��.rP" i:° c4I .an ��: �!�1BTH:sr' ^r '•.t $T �Ji zr u`n r. s 4 •r,•�'t7•,;`•ia� f �'S; 0 3 SW 19TH 3 • ,'.,N ST y P • 1 ii.?�Y' _r t ? d^...l_•t-'...f V y J i _-_ NI �' O �� -lie[ '} O/�f'� 5[_�lE_INj: '3` .!iJ G`5_.19TH •'ST,. ,PIrANOL O,p,,' .•I 4RA ?u.,,a.0,44 S ..�F..S.:\\'sF '1IFFl --' LON64CRE5 1''..i • : 'CM l S ��CLL_i*: �<c is c�14.'� S,AR,9„` PAR I RACE `.1-:;{':' SN 215Ti5T -<W, = J wl PUGET i'%`T'o� �;fil�t!-4!i,„;rw,£. _: .�,/ 1T.RACK 1 r ¢ _. ca'.s•1 c;E`.+5.7 :y`_I:• ��I �: tltl:^ Sr �'stur. s L ".i Ei 2 1 C�` : .4,,k t..x z } L 21tT R W t ' I .....I s- - _ 51 de __'y SL 1nG°L7:t .^'. -.iF.._ ST-_1 ,• 1.SW 23RD'.ST S 23RD_` _-`�"-ST>L r ,, I 1---�•rf > I --5--�"fF��r a ^.c ! I i. .,a.s . JR HS I i :•Y! ' a r.ST • I > • ,t; - o n.r 3r ;'9 7 r6P Q.<' ST I:I < r;SE L. ' J I •i'v _ IS-ar.' \\_Z6T,1L _. ,1-1-4 " ___ - _ 15Li•.S. Q t � * .� /vrr Y`'�� ��?-yTi .'_ _�._..- F •JD� a SS 1.°R+ �T"' -:Etr.^.. i - - Su ;27 I =�. `'"?`r"+'%;,' '�".°>i I 27TH ST _ SE-_.. 4TH - ST- SE°164TH .ST: t w 7W c.5=7'4 FT_�tell s•P) 1@t%ST`�~,'1'�oei I s 2Blx-_sr,n a' ": S'_!EETH PCs = :1¢ST•1 5T • r� ' ,� i.IL 41• �•r?• 9iMS Yi SF� =.Tx Sr 1 n9T `e i. :�1•ii_:M•.. Z \ ,t u� I` N ! 29T}i ST 70 ��bq\s"•°��jtlS,�,NStt� :.n w Sr 5_E..s;Th •si; E. s[_;liE:�":� _ -F'>_ZJ N; ` I ' £< �i`.'°:r rv.1Y LT, .,,a"" _ I <'� _ • Yztl ',c.�,nr Su 30TH I g ''." i°_ H1so� -- " •:r, ^I _ E :>'il:sia _ I I -ST i ♦ a ---46T-Si_e3s '� << '' --. .. .- _'- _ SWi33FD5T ' , ' �EBV \$! ins ,E .Vf.,^JIry� 6NH'es' 16 a • ! I i I S '"r 5._ ` _I F! SE 170TH ST ;_• 1f5TM- J�O i'•s�rH•` < o (130 ---"t-+ ST I ,J. " • o c 172R05- \•%._SE ... 172ND ;T - 'c • :'!_•.k n ti'7 i 0 N 1 — MILE FIGURE 1 VICINITY MAP SCHNEIDER/OZBOLT/WA PROJECT NO. 9631552 DRAWING NO. 67625 DATE 9/25/96 DRAWN BY CB Golder Associates i I ; FIGURE 2 SITE PLAN Golder Associates ' I I / t Vs ,a, TP-3 \ 6 / TP-7 L \ N`L � / / TP-4 -____ C. \ ii /- - - - in' TP-2 [ \ / Northwest ` S\0Pe / \ Upland 4 eaK\�/ I _ \ ,�% / a,i\o �, -, / \,O° Optional 1 \ TP-8 .\o BUILDING 3 .- Southeast TP-1 \ / -0- Pppto� / Lowland _ TP-6 ,_/ / TP-5 t I , Legend riProposed Building Location — Property Boundary N Test Pit Number and Approximate Location FIGURE 2 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN TP-1 SCHNEIDER/OZBOLT/WA PROJECT NO.963 1552 DRAWING NO. 68165 DATE 9/26/96 DRAWN BY EA - Golder Associates • APPENDIX A SUMMARY TEST PIT LOGS __ Golder Associates Unified Soil Classification System Component Definitions by Gradation Soil Clossification Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and Names i Generalized Component Size Range Group Descriptions Boulders Above 12 in. COARSE—GRAINED SOILS GRAVELS CLEAN GRAVELS GW Well—graded Grovels More thon 50% More than 50% of Less than 5% fines Cobbles 3 in. to 12 in. retained on coarse fraction GP Poorly—graded grovels No. 200 sieve retained on Gravel 3 in. to No. 4 (4.76mm) No. 4 Sieve Grovel and Silt GRAVELS WITH FINES GM Mixtures Coarse gravel 3 in. to 3/4 in. More than 129. fines Gravel and Clay Fine grovel 3/4 in. to No. 4 (4.76mm) GC Mixtures Sand No. 4 (4.76mm) to No. 200 (0.074mm) SANDS CLEAN SANDS SW Well—graded Sands 50% or more of Less then 5% lines Coorse sand No. 4 (4.76mm) to Na. 10 (2.0mm) coarse fraction SP Poorly—graded Sands Medium sand No. 10 (2.0mm) to No. 40 (0.42mm) posses No. 4 Sieve Fine sand No. 40 (0.42mm) to No. 200 (0.074mm) SANDS WITH FINES SM Sand and Silt Mixtures More than 12% fines Silt and Cloy Smaller than No. 200 (0.074mm) ' SC Sand and Clay Mixtures FINE—GRAINED SOILS SILTS AND CLAYS CL Low—plasticity Clays 50% or more passes Liquid limit INORGANIC the No. 200 sieve less than 50 Non—plastic and Low— ML Plasticity Silts Samples Non—plastic and Low— ' ORGANIC OL Plasticity Organic Clays I Non—plastic and Low— SS SPT Sampler (2.0" 0D) Plasticity Organic Silts HD Heavy Duty Split Spoon — SILTS AND CLAYS CH High—plasticity Cloys SH Shelby Tube Liquid limit INORGANIC greater than 50 P Pitcher Sampler MH High—plasticity Silts - High—plasticity B Bulk ORGANIC OH Organic Cloys C Cored High—plasticity Organic Silts Unless otherwise noted, drive samples HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS Primorily orgonic matter, dark in color, and advanced with 140 lb. hammer with 1 I organic odor PT Peat 30 in. drop. Relative Density or Consistency Laboratory Tests Utilizing Standard Penetration Test Values Test Designation Cohesionless Soils(a) Cohesive Soils (b) Moisture (1) I Density D (c) (c) Relative c Undroined (d) Grain Size G --- Density N, blows/ft. Density Consistency N, blows/ft. Shear Strength (%) (psf) Hydrometer H __ Atterberg Limits (1) Very loose 0 to 4 0 — 15 Very soft 0 to 2 ' <250 Consolidation C Loose 4 to 10 15 — 35 Soft 2 to 4 250-500 Unconfined U Compact 10 to 30 35 — 65 Firm 4 to 8 ' 500-1000 UU Triox UU Dense 30 to 50 65 — 85 Stiff 8 to 15 1000-2000 CU Trios CU --- Very Dense over 50 >85 Very Stiff 15 to 30 2000-4000 CD Triox CD Hord over 30 >4000 Permeability P -- (a) Soils consisting of grovel, sand, and silt, either separately or in combination, possessing no characteristics (1) Moisture and Atterberg Limits of plasticity, and exhibiting drained behavior. plotted on log. (b) Soils possessing the characteristics of plasticity, and exhibiting undroined behavior. (c) Refer to text of ASTM D 1586-84 for a definition of N; in normally consolidated cohesionless soils Relative Density terms are bosed on N values corrected for overburden pressures. (d) Undrained shear strength = 1/2 unconfined compression strength. Silt and Clay Descriptions Description Typical Unified LI Designation Descriptive Terminology Denoting Component Proportions Silt ML (non—plastic) Clayey Silt CL—ML (low plasticity) Descriptive Terms Ronge of Proportion Silty Clay CL Clay CH Trace 0-5% Plostic Silt MH __ Little 5-12% Some or Adjective (a) 12-30% Organic Soils OL, OH, Pt And 30-50% (a) Use Gravelly, Sandy or Silty os appropriate. ' �� Golder Associates Figure SOIL CLASSIFICATION/LEGEND 773-1064/F0RM573 -I - jGo1der FIELD TEST PIT LOG Associates Temp. 60° Weather Partly cloudy Engineer TPM Operator Dave Nelson Test Pit 1 Equipment 580 Case Backhoe 'Contractor Schneider Date 9/18/96 Location SE Site Corner 'Elevation No Topo Datum MSL Job 963 1552 I- I SE —11.-- NW I 0 5 10 15 20 �:- :- -. .. .--�.=.—a- Samples No Depth — ..'..:.;' • .: 'i!•:::::.r4 :',: iF ;•:•:::i::y, :::: ? 1 .5-5.0 2 7.0-9.5 3 9.5-10.5 5 7'...d.. ''.',•0 is t)•a -0:-.:.. i —10 __-__.-_ —15 —20 I_ , Sample Descriptions and Excavation Notes Time Depth of Hole I Depth to W/L Surface: Grass.blackberries.shrubs 0845 0' • 5 10.5' 10.5' 0-.5': Loose.moderate brown(5YR 4/4).sandy SILT.roots.sod (TOPSOIL) _ 2 - i'. ....- u..- - : - . . . .,. •• : . . - .. ' Special Notes silty fine SAND trace roots(FLOOD DEPOSITS) Some caving at 9-10.5' 5.0-5.5': Compact.light gray(N7).stratified.silty SAND(FLOOD -- - DEPOSITS) Moderate seepage at 10'(1-2 glom) 5.5-7 0'• Compact.moderate yellowish brown(10YR 6/6)to light Bottom of hole at 10.5'.0930 gray(N7)oxidized.stratified,fine SAND and SILT (FLOOD DEPOSITS) Backfilled on 9/18 at 0940 (3) 7.0-9.5': Compact.reddish brown(10R 3/4)to moderate brown (5YR 3/4),stratified.fine to coarse SAND and GRAVEL. trace cobbles.trace silt(ALLUVIUM) I IJ 9.5-10.5': Firm,grayish olive(10Y 4/2)to light brown(5YR 5/4). ' stratified.sandy SILT(ALLUVIUM) PROJECT NO.963 1552 DRAWING NO.68166 DATE 9/26/96 DRAWN BY EA jGo1der FIELD TEST PIT LOG Associates Temp. 60° Weather Partly cloudy Engineer TPM Operator Dave Nelson Test Pit 2 Equipment 580 Case Backhoe Contractor Schneider Date 9/18/96 Location Middle of East Side of Site Elevation No Topo Datum MSL Job 963 1552 N �_ ► S II II III III .III III II II 0 5 10 15 20 0 • �.:.:.::::r::::::.:..:::.:..:...::.;::::..:::.::.:::..:.:::,:::.:—:,-::�.:.::::,:,:.:.:. Samples No Depth th — —10 —15 —20 Sample Descriptions and Excavation Notes Time Depth of Hole Depth to W/L Surface: Grass.blackberries 0945 0' None 1000 8.5' 0 0-.5': Loose.moderate brown(5YR 4/4).sandy SILT.roots throughout (TOPSOIL-SOD) `J 5-3 0'• Loose to Compact,moderate yellowish brown(10YR 6l6)• Special Notes stratified.silty fine SAND.trace roots(FLOOD DEPOSITS) Heavy caving from 3-5',and from 6-8.5' n 3.0-5.0': Loose.Tight olive gray(5Y 5/2)to moderate brown(5YR Terminated at 8.5'due to caving 4/4).stratified.gravelly SAND.trace cobbles.trace silt (ALLUVIUM) No groundwater encountered 5.0-5.5': Compact.moderate yellowish brown(10YR 6/6)oxidized. stratified.fine SAND and SILT(ALLUVIUM) 5.5-8.5': Loose.light olive gray(5Y 5/2)to grayish brown(5YR' 3/2).gravelly fine to coarse SAND.little cobbles,trace silt(ALLUVIUM) PROJECT NO.963 1552 DRAWING NO. 68167 DATE 9/23/96 DRAWN BY EA jGo1der FIELD TEST PIT LOG Associates • Temp. 60° Weather Overcast Engineer TPM - Operator Dave Nelson Test Pit 3 Schneider Date 9/18/96 580 Case Backhoe Contractor Schn Equipment Location NE Corner of Site Elevation No Topo Datum MSL Job 963 1552 NW -► SE 0 5 10 15 20 0 ' _ t:_ _.._ - Samples 1 2-9.5P No De th .' 49)-2 ' —5 ///- \ ---' \\\V ‘\\\\ " —10 —15 —20 Sample Descriptions and Excavation Notes lime Depth of Hole Depth to W/L Surface: Grass.blackberries 1003 0' None 1020 9.5' 0-.5': Loose.moderate brown(5YR 4/4).sandy SILT.little fine gravel.little roots(TOPSOIL-SOD) 0 5-2_04 Compact,pale yellowish brown(10YR 6/2)Jn light brown Special Notes (5YR 6/4),stratified,SILT and fine SAND.trace roots' (FLOOD DEPOSITS) ! No caving __O 2.0-9.5': Highly to completely weathered.nonstratified.poorly I No groundwater • graded.dark yellowish orange(10YR 6/6)to grayish I yellow(5Y 8/4).fine to medium grained.extremely weak Terminated at 9:5'on 9/18 at 1020 (RO).SANDSTONE(RENTON FORMATION) Backfilled 9/18 PROJECT NO.963 1552 DRAWING NO. 68168 DATE 9/26/96 DRAWN BY EA • ëGo1der FIELD TEST PIT LOG Associates Temp. 60° Weather Overcast Engineer TPM Operator Dave Nelson Test Pit 4 Equipment 580 Case Backhoe Contractor Schneider Date 9/18/96 Location Mid North Side of Site Elevation No Topo Datum - MSL Job 963 1552 SW ► NE II II I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I 0 5 10 15 20 Samples No Depth •••••:::::: ••:::::•: •:::::.:,.:::•:••••:••:::.;:>xr• 1 2-5 I \\\ 110 � I --15 —20 Sample Descriptions and Excavation Notes Time Depth of Hole I Depth to W/L Surface: 3"on site fill over grass 1030 0' None 1050 9.5' -0 0-1.0': Loose.dark yellowish brown(10YR 4/2).SILT and fine SAND.trace gravel.trace roots(TOPSOIL-SOD) 11 Ll 1 0-2 0'• Compact,moderate yellow(5Y 7/6)_stratified sandy SILT Special Notes trace gravel (FLOOD DEPOSIT) No caving or groundwater 0 2.0-5.0': Dense.light olive gray(5Y 5/2).unstratified,silty SAND, little fine to coarse gravel.oxidized(TILL) Terminated at 9.5'on 9/18 at 1050 (4) 5.0-9.5': Moderately to completely weathered,.nonstratified.poorly Backfilled 9/18 graded.dark yellowish_orange(10YR 6/6)to light bluish gray(5B 7/1).fine to medium grained.extremely weak (RO).SANDSTONE(RENTON FORMATION) PROJECT NO.963 1552 DRAWING NO.68169 DATE 9/26/96 DRAWN BY EA --I I . i Golder FIELD TEST PIT LOG Associates Temp. 60° Weather Overcast Engineer TPM Operator Dave Nelson Test Pit 5 Equipment 580 Case Backhoe Contractor Schneider Date 9N8/96 Location Mid South Side Elevation No Topo Datum MSL Job 963 1552 NE — SW I I II 1 1 1 1 1 II I' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 5 10 I 15 20 Samples No Depth 1 3-7 .O:p;:1J•up:�up'a:O;;p�Op�!,D:p'0;;4�p:O;'d:p,. - �7:p:Q.D::�3 .Q;.:...C•I,a. ao.. oo,:.ao..,d`� `.ti a.:o-o:II o•,Qr M p:Nj:o:_b:A:?pig(:q'. - 5 :;otiD:b:q.;0' :og4od:D�oIIorr — ':oa:ao:a.aoQ.aoon: on:o' • —10 ' I _ — i —15 — i j —20 — I Sample Descriptions and Excavation Notes I lime I Depth of Hole Depth to W/L Surface: Grass.blackberries 1105 0' None 1120 7.0' 0-1.0': Loose.dark yellowish brown(10YR 4/2).sandy SILT. trace gravel-trace roots(TOPSOIL-SOD) Q 1 0-3 0'• Loose to compact,pale yellowish brown(10YR 6/2) Special Notes oxidized.stratified.silty fine SAND.trace roots(FLOOD • DEPOSITS) Heavy caving from 2-7' 0 3.0-7.0': Compact.light brown(5YR 5/6)to light olive brown(5Y Terminated at 7'due to caving 5/6).stratified,sandy coarse GRAVEL.some cobbles.' • trace silt(ALLUVIUM) Backfilled on 9/18 at 1122 PROJECT NO.963 1552 DRAWING NO. 68170 DATE 9/26/96 DRAWN BY EA • jGo1der FIELD TEST PIT LOG Associates Temp. 60° Weather Overcast Engineer TPM Operator Dave Nelson Test Pit 6 Equipment 580 Case Backhoe Contractor Schneider Date 9/18/96 Location Mid SW Side of Site Elevation No Topo Datum MSL Job 963 1552 SW NE 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I ,I I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 0 5/ f ` 10 15 20 _0 `/ /0/// �/ � / �� Samples No Depth — — - 1 7-11 I I —5 • —1 0 ,g,11 \\ —15 i —20 Sample Descriptions and Excavation Notes lime Depth of Hole Depth to W/L Surface: Grass.blackberries 1125 0' 1145 11.0' 10.5 • -01 0-1.0': Loose.dark yellowish brown(10YR 4/2).sandy SILT.I trace gravel,trace roots(TOPSOIL-SOD) `J 1.0-3 0'• I nose to compact,dusky yellow(5Y 6/4)to dark ypIloWish Special Notes orange(10YR 6/6).silty fine SAND.trace roots(FLOOD DEPOSITS) No caving 3.0-10.0': Dense.light olive gray(5Y 5/2).unstratified,_silty fine to Slight seepage at 10.5' coarse SAND.little fine to coarse gravel(TILL).becomes softer and wet from 7-7.5'.becomes dark yellowish Terminated at 11.0'on 9/18 at 1150 orange(10YR 6/6)at 10' ^ Backfilled at 1155 on 9/18 ,J 10.0'11.0':Completely weathered to resit-Ilial.nonstratified.poorly graded.dark yellowish orange(10YR 6/6)to moderate yellowish brown(1 QYR 5/41,fine to medium grained extremely weak(R0)._SANDSTONE(RENTON FORMATION) PROJECT NO.9631552 DRAWING NO. 68171 DATE 9/26/96 DRAWN BY EA ë1der� FIELD TEST PIT LOG Associates Temp. 60° Weather Overcast Engineer TPM Operator Dave Nelson Test Pit 7 Equipment 580 Case Backhoe Contractor Schneider Date 9/18/96 Location NW Corner of Site Elevation No Topo Datum MSL Job 963 1552 NW SE I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 5 10 15 20 Samples No Depth —5 I i — —10 • I — —15 —20 Sample Descriptions and Excavation Notes Time Depth of Hole Depth to W/L Surface: Grass.wood debris.trash 1155 0' None 1210 4.0' 0-1.0': Loose.moderate brown(5YR 3/4).sandy SILT.trace fine gravel.trace roots(TOPSOIL) 2� 1-0-9-5' C omnart y yellow(5Y 6/4)to dark y Ilo■ish ora_ nn a Special Notes (10YR 6/6).stratified.sandy SILT,trace roots(FLOOD: DEPOSITS) No caving or groundwater 2.5-4.0': Slightly weathered to completely weathered.nonstratified. Terminated at 4'due to refusal poorly graded dark yellowish orange(10YR 6/6)to light bluish gray(5B 7/1).fine to medium grained.extremely Backfilled on 9/18 at 1210 weak(RO)to weak(R1).SANDSTONE(RENTON FORMATION) Refusal at 4.0 feet I I PROJECT NO.963 1552 DRAWING NO. 68172 DATE 9/26/96 DRAWN BY EA fGo1der FIELD TEST PIT LOG Associates Temp. 60° Weather Overcast,showers Engineer TPM Operator Dave Nelson Test Pit 8 Equipment 580 Case Backhoe Contractor Schneider Date 9/18/96 Location SW Corner of Site Elevation No Topo Datum MSL Job 963 1552 SW -' NE 1 1 1 1 1 I II II III II 0 5 10 15 20 -0 _ _ J I Samples _:._....- —...—...— _.. No Depth _ 2 __ — 41 5 ///� QI 111r 1' ,\ _10 —15 —20 Sample Descriptions and Excavation Notes Time Depth of Hole Depth to W/L Surface: Brush.brambles.fallen trees 1215 0' None 1235 10.0' 10 0-0.5': Loose.dusky brown(5YR 2/2).sandy SILT.trace fine I gravel.trace roots(TOPSOIL) 0 5-3 04 Compact,dusky yellow(5Y 6/4)to dark yellowish orange Special Notes (10YR 6/6).stratified.sandy SILT.trace roots(FLOOD • DEPOSITS) No caving.no groundwater 03 3.0-3.5': Dense.light olive gray(5Y 5/2).unstratified silty SAND. Terminated at 10'due to refusal little fine to coarse gravel (TILL) ® 3.5-10.0': Moderately to completely weathered,nonstratified.poorly graded.dark yellowish orange(10YR 6/6)to light bluish gray(5B 7/1).fine to medium grained.extremelyweak (RO).SANDSTONE(RENTON FORMATION) PROJECT NO.963 1552 DRAWING NO.68173 DATE 9/26/96 DRAWN BY EA rq) DRAINAGE REPORT FOR OZBOLT APARTMENT SITE t CLIENT: Schneider Homes, Inc. 6510 Southcenter Blvd., #1 Tukwila, WA 98188 Phone: (206)248-2471 cc 4 PREPARED BY: ; .cl 4\cOjk Daley-Morrow-Poblete, Inc. eg �2 � 0Y P• s0N 1215 South Central Ave., Suite 133 oe.0.o0 Kent, WA 98032 Phone: (206)854-9344 OER Sp PROJECT No. 96120 SU �'�'�Ol{' ' DATE: December 29,1996 � :< _: • REVISED: Ma:-ch 11, 1997 -'44 z .478 ' 4o4 "'n1i,tAL C`� ; PROJECT OVERVIEW PROJECT OVERVIEW The project site is located within a portion of the Southwest Quarter of Section 18, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, Willamette Meridian, in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. The property is between Maple Avenue S.W. and Hardie Avenue S.W., ,and is north of the Plum Tree Park Apartment complex. The property is approximately 2 acres in size and is mostly covered with short grass, some trees and brush along the property lines. Existing ground generally slopes from the northwest corner to the southeast corner of the property. Off-site runoff from the single-family residence north of the property enters the site along the northern property line and sheet flows across the site. There are no off-site runoff entering the site from the west, south and east sides of the property. Runoff collects in the existing ditch along the east side of the property then drains into the conveyance facility within Hardie Avenue S.W. which consists of 12" CMP pipes and catch basins. The stormwater then travels southeast along Hardie Avenue, then southwest along the Burlington Northern Railroad, then south where it drains into the conveyance facility within S.W. 7th street. An apartment complex with associated parking is being proposed for the site. All the proposed improvements are shown in the conceptual utility plan. A detention vault and bioswale will be provided for water quantity and quality control. Runoff will be collected by a series of pipes and catch basins within the pawed areas. Post-development runoff discharge will be to the same downstream conveyance facilities as the pre-developed condition. - I I I Page 1 of 2 King County Building and Land Development Division TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET PART 1 PROJECT OWNER AND PART 2 PROJECT LOCATION • PROJECT ENGINEER AND DESCRIPTION Project Owner SC/-/NE/DER //oL1 ES, /A/C. Project Name OZl3OLT i4/°ARTfr/W7S Address 6510 SOt 7N CEiUTE2 ,gL.1/D. Location Phone6206)2 9B-2 417/ '-K`41/44 WA 98/49 Township 231V Project Engineer iiEL L.✓,m6yr A E: Range S E Section a Company ,l)4/Ey- /KogeDu/-,PAl3LSfa;/it.0 • Project Size 2. o AC Address Phone (240 gs- ' 934e4/ Upstream Drainage Basin Size O.5 AC PART 3 TYPE OF PERMIT APPLICATION PART 4 OTHER PERMITS Subdivision 0 DOF/G HPA Shoreline Management 0 Short Subdivision El COE 404 0 Rockery 0 Grading I DOE Dam Safety Structural Vaults Xr Commercial I I FEMA Floodplain 0 Other 0 Other El COE Wetlands 0 HPA PART 5 SITE COMMUNITY AND DRAINAGE BASIN Community 6/WA? R 116R2. (/ LGey Drainage Basin 6,e&EN )P/1E,2 l34S/A/ PART 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS I I River 0 Floodplain I I Stream El Wetlands El Critical Stream Reach 0 Seeps/Springs 0 Depressions/Swales I I High Groundwater Table El Lake I I Groundwater Recharge 0 Steep Slopes I 1 Other In Lakeside/Erosion Hazard PART 7 SOILS • Soil Type Slopes Erosion Potential Erosive V ocities B�aurif� 6 -/S 7- N1oeu4f z. 5 1/46 band c -ic % r1od4ra.4— 2. S I I Additional Sheets Attatched 1/90 Page 2 ot 2 King County Building and Land Development Division TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET •ART 8 DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS • REFERENCE LIMITATION/SITE CONSTRAINT r I Ch.4;Downstream Analysis f_ I I I II I O I I � Additional Sheets Attatched PART 9 ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION LLOWING CONSTRUCTION imentation Facilities stabilize Exposed Surface ��tabilized Construction Entrance emove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities Zi. Perimeter Runoff Control F7Cfean and Remove All Silt and Debris / Clearing and Grading Restrictions I /( Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities I7Cover Practices Fag Limits of NGPES I/1 Construction Sequence I 1 Other I I Other 0 SURFACE WATER SYSTEM ,'rass Lined Channel 0 Tank In; Infiltration Method of Analysis Pipe System I Vault (—I Depression .SaV/y j 4)7a4)4L I 1 Open Channel In Energy Dissapator l Flow Dispersal Compensation/Mitigation I 1 Dry Pond I I Wetland l 11 Waiver of Eliminated Site Storage I 1 Wet Pond n Stream n Regional Detention Brief Description of System Operation Facility Related Site Limitations fl Additional Sheets Attatched Reference Facility Limitation PAR 1 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS PART 12 EASEMENTS/TRACTS (May -quire special structural review) • 0 Drainage Easement I I Cast in Place Vault CI Other I I J Access Easement I I Retaining Wall I I Native Growth Protection Easement Li Rockery>4'High I I Tract I Structural on Steep Slope I ] Other •ART 14 SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER I or a civil engineer under my supervision have visited the site. Actual ���j site conditions as observed were incorporated into this worksheet and the / /� �,�j� attatchments. To the best of my knowledge the information provided .�i- _ _ ' `7 I here is accurate. � sr�� 1/90 it II PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS SUMMARY CORE REQUIREMENT#1: DISCHARGE AT THE NATURAL LOCATION The proposed bioswale will collect and discharge all runoff to the natural location as shown in conceptual utility plan. CORE REQUIREMENT#2: OFFSITE ANALYSIS The offsite analysis is included in this report. CORE REQUIREMENT#3: RUNOFF CONTROL A detention vault is proposed for this project to control post-development runoff. The facility was sized using both the King County Criteria of matching the 2-yr and 10-yr pre-development peak flow rates plus 30 percent,and the City of Renton's criteria of matching the 2-yr, 10-yr and 100-yr pre-development peak flow rates. The bioswale was sized using King County's design criteria. CORE REQUIREMENT#4: CONVEYANCE SYSTEM The proposed conveyance facilities are show in the conceptual utility plan and will be sized in the final design. CORE REQUIREMENT#5: TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL Temporary erosion control facilities per King County and the City of Renton will be provided and will be shown on the final plans. SPECIAL REQUIREMENT#1: CRITICAL DRAINAGE AREA The project site does not lie within a critical drainagel area. SPECIAL REQUIREMENT#2: COMPLIANCE WITH AN EXISTING MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN The project site does not lie within an existing master drainage plan. SPECIAL REQUIREMENT#3: CONDITIONS REQUIRING A MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN There are no conditions that would require a master drainage plan for this project. SPECIAL REQUIREMENT#4: ADOPTED BASIN OR COMMUNITY PLANS The property does not lie within an adopted basin or community plan area. SPECIAL REQUIREMENT#5: SPECIAL WATER QUALITY CONTROLS The proposed impervious area subject to vehicular use will be less than 1 acre,therefore, no special water quality control is required. SPECIAL REQUIREMENT#6: COALESCING PLATE OIL/WATER SEPARATORS This condition does not apply to this project. SPECIAL REQUIREMENT#7: CLOSED DEPRESSIONS The are no closed depressions onsite. SPECIAL REQUIREMENT#8: USE OF LAKES,WETLANDS OR CLOSED DEPRESSIONS FOR RUNOFF CONTROL It is not proposed to use any lakes,wetlands or closed depressions for runoff control. SPECIAL REQUIREMENT#9: DELINEATION OF THE 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN The property does not abut,nor does it contain a 100-yr floodplain. The Fema map is included in the Level I Downstream Analysis. SPECIAL REQUIREMENT#10: FLOOD PROTECTION FACILITIES FOR TYPE 1 AND TYPE 2 STREAMS The property does not contain or abut a Type 1 or Type 2 stream. SPECIAL REQUIREMENT#11: GEOTECHNICAL ANALYSIS AND REPORT This project does not propose to construct a pond within 200 feet of a steep slope,or create a 6'high berm. It is also not proposed to modify existing flood protection facilities. SPECIAL REOUIREMENT#12: SOILS ANALYSIS AND REPORT The site soils are clearly shown in the soils map in ITatk 2 of the Level I Downstream Analysis. • • DETENTION ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 71f/,p.. 6° 'd�" i/,f 20 .0 y / Ss oo� r2- i ~ °5 8r/Czz-5'12 ' = d' l // 00E = 7 9/2 = 1 S/ O = szi : galg rry ose 4• °S 7 4 9 (75�) dho = �i : /VO1 Ir110N0 .210 PII S8 0/ 'z S-10/(leggy S8 06 / w)-tsdd (106.647 u /8- . - 02'0 fisIza'8 c7oo07 (s.paiv, 1/_.9afb' .9s79 oared/ /.cos = Jag'; = 97/0S j1/5'. NO/ /0 /v / 9 SSe- yj S6 6/ /EN Oz/96 .V/V-91//?%#' 17090 . | 1 S. C. S. TYPE 1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ (YEAR) , DURATION (HOUR\ , PRECIP ( INCHES) 2, 24, 2 | ,-Y1S71-A, �`������������������ ******************** S. C. S. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2. 00" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* __________________ _ _____________________________________ ENTER: A (PERV) , CN (PERV) , A ( IMPE V) , CN ( IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 2. 1 , 85, 0, 0, 18:3 � � DATA PRINT-OUT: � AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) A CN A | CN 2. 1 2. 1 85. 0 18. 3 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK (HRS) VOL (CU-FT) . 30 7. 83 6046 ENTER [d: ] [path]filename[ . ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: S. C. S. TYPE-IA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ (YEAR) , DURATION (HOUR) , PRECIP ( INCHES) 10,24,2. 9 ���� ���������� ******************** S. C. S. TYPE"1A DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2. 90" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ................................L....................... ------ I ENTER: A(PERV) , CN (PERV) , A ( IMP V) , CN ( IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 2. 1 , 85, 0, 0 18. 3 ' DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) _ PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) ' - A CN A CN 2. 1 2. 1 85. 0 . 0 18. 3 18. 3 � PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK (HRS) V L (CU-FT) . 64 7. 83 | 11425 ------- ' ENTER [d: ] [path]filename[ . ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: � � S. C. S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER FR:EO (YEAR) , DUR:AT I ON(HIOUR) „ F REC I F' ( INCHES) ****:*************** S. C. S. TYPE - IA DISTRIBUTION *****************-k** ********* 100-YEAR 4-•HOUR STORM **** 7. 90" TOTAL F'RECIF'. ********* - - ------ - ------------ ENTER: A(F'ERV) , CN (F'ERV) , ACI MF'ER:V) ., CN (I MF'E :V) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 2. 1 , 85, M, 0, 1 8. _ DATA PRINT--OUT AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (M INUTES) A CN A ON 2. 1 85. 0 . 0 . 0 1 F'EAF -Q (CFE) T-F'EA<: (HRS) VOL (CU_ FT) 1 . 07 ;. B_ 7 9 ENTER Ed: .-I E pa t h] i l e nam E . e x L- ] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: i • s IJ/-H gO iv(Z = y 51E. ^, A LZ - �b : 7 7 59f = 7 S/.Q = 3,1_wiM xo9 °5 YXo,9 J • '5 s- / 7 f 7 � 8oC7 � �s © = /12/1101N3Wiv00 10 34//1 99 09%p N 09 d7 "9 •o£,•o•. . soOYY? 86 Z'/. . S 19o/A /3c/1/ ,k7 (53aoy) /3 aid . 3572 GNt>7 2777d4NJ NoW911/121 O�ud07343 _566 O0/96 .cLN3G/14J6'd d 170E 12 � ^ , � �' � S. C. S. TYPE-IA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION C�W^ `^ ENTER: FREQ (YEAR> , DURATION (HOUR) , PRECIP ( INCHES) 1 2, 24, 2 _________ ________ ____ ____________________________ ******************** S. C. S. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2. 00" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A (PERV) , CN (PERV) , A ( IMPERV) , CN ( IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 . 9, 84, 1 . 2, 98 5. 4 � � � DATA PRINT-OUT: � AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) A CN A CN 2. 1 . 9 84. 0 1 . 2 98. 0 5. 4 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK (HRS) VOL (CU-FT) . 74 7. 67 10159 ---_--- i ENTER [d: ] [path]filename[ . ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: S. C. S. TYPE-IA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ (YEAR) , DURATION (HOUR) , PRECIP ( INCHES) 10524r2. 9 ******************** S. C. S. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2. 90" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* _ ______________________ __7_________________________________ ENTER: A (PERV) , CN (PERV) , A ( IMPERV) , [CN ( IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 . 9, 84, 1 . 2, 98, 5. 4 ' DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) ' A CN A CN 2. 1 . 9 84. 0 1 . 2 98. 0 5. 4 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK (HRS) VOL (C �-FT) 1 . 20 7. 67 16311 � ENTER [d: ] [path]filename[ . ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: a: t10 . � � FILE ALREAD1 S.O. S. TYPE-1A. RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: f=R:EO (YEAR) , I)UR'AT I:ON (HOUR:) . P(w EC I P ( I FICHES) cOe'r445-46304 0 1 ID/ 76 04 100, 24, 3. 9 ****** ************ S. C. S. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION *****.***************: ********* 100-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM *** 3. 90" TOTAL PREC I P. ********* ----- ENTER: A (PERV) • CN (DERV) , A ( I MPERV) , ON ( I MPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 . 9 q 8 4 g 1 . 2 q 7E 8 q 5. 4 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TO (MINUTES) A ON A ON 2. 1 . 9 84. 0 1 .2 98. 0 5. 4 DEAD::.-O (CF S) T-PEAK (HRS) VOL (CU-FT) 1 . 75 7. I ENTER G d a 7 E pat h 1.f i 1 ename E . ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH � ^ � � a: Woo � . - . - - . . SUMMARY OF INPUT ITEMS 7'-R tfg-pQrr 1 ) TYPE OF FACILITY: VAULT 2) STORAGE DEPTH (ft) : 2. 50 Pam� A 3) VERTICAL PERMEABILITY (min/in) : . 00 4) PRIMARY DESIGN HYDROGRAPH FILENAME: a:t10 5> PRIMARY RELEASE RATE (cfs) : . 64 6) NUMBER OF TEST HYDROGRAPHS: 2 TEST HYD 1 FILENAME: a: t2 TARGET RELEASE (cfs) : . 30 TEST HYD 2 FILENAME: a: t100 TARGET RELEASE (cfs) : 1 . 07 7) NUMBER-OF-ORIFICES, RISER-HEAD (ft , RISER-DIAM ( in) : 2, 2. 50, 12 8) ITERATION DISPLAY: NO � ENTER ITEM NUMBER TO BE REVISED (ENTER ZERO IF NO REVISIONS ARE REQUIRED) : 0 INITIAL STORAGE VALUE FOR ITERATION PURPOSES: 5463 CU-FT BOTTOM ORIFICE: ENTER Q-MAX (cfs) . 39 DIA. = 3. 02 INCHES TOP ORIFICE: ENTER HEIGHT (ft) 1 . 55 DIA. = 3. 08 INCHES PERFORMANCE: INFLOW TARGET-OUTFLOW ACTUAL-OUTFLOW PK-STAGE STORAGE DESIGN HYD: 1 . 20 . 64 . 64 2. 50 1933 TEST HYD 1 : : 74 . 30 . 30 1 . 52 1170 TEST HYD 2: 1 . 75 1 . 07 1 . 75 2. 73 2130 SPECIFY: D - DOCUMENT, R - REVISE, A - ADJUST ORIF, E - ENLARGE, S - STOP ' . � � � . � � . � e ENLARGEMENT OPTION: ALLOWS FOR INCREASING STORAGE AT A SPECIFIED STAGE HEIGHT, TO PROVIDE A FACTOR OF SAFETY. ENTER: STORAGE-INCREASE (%) , STAGE-Y' EIGHT (ft) 30, 2. 5 � PERFORMANCE: INFLOW TARGET-OUTFLoW ACTUAL-OUTFLOW PK-STAGE STORAGE DESIGN HYD: 1 .20 . 64 . 57 2.20 2216 TEST HYD 1 : . 74 . 30 . 28 1 . 29 1300 TEST HYD 2: 1 . 75 1 . 07 1 . 73 2. 72 2740 SPECIFY: D - DOCUMENT, R - REVISE, A - ADJUST ORIF, E - ENLARGE, S - STOP d � PERFORMANCE: INFLOW TARGET-OUTFL6W ACTUAL-OUTFLOW PK-STAGE STORAGE DESIGN HYD: 1 . 20 . 64 . 57 2. 20 2216 TEST HYD 1 : ... 74 30 28 1 . 29 1300 � TEST HYD 2: 1 . 75 1 . 07 1 . 73 2. 72 2740 STRUCTURE DATA: R/D-VAULT RISER-HEAD VAULT-BOTTOM-AREA STOP-DEPTH STORAGE-VOLUME 2. 50 FT 1006. 3 SO-FT 2;50 FT 2515 CU-FT *65-- TqQw - Je DOUBLE ORIFICE RESTRICTOR: DIA ( INC lES) HT (FEET) Q-MAX (CFS) x� ' ��Z . . 00 BOTTOM ORIFICE: 3 0 . 00 . 390 ' � TOP ORIFICE: 3. 08 1 . 55 . 250 --- ROUTING DATA: ' STAGE (FT) DISCHARGE (CFS) STORAGEOCU-FT) PERM-AREA (SO-FT) . 00 . 00 /. 0 . 0 . 25 . 12 25146 . 0 . 50 . 17 503. 1 . 0 . 75 . 21 751. 7 . 0 1 . 00 . 25 1006. 3 . 0 1 . 25 . 28 1257. 8 . 0 1. 50 . 30 1509. 4 . 0 1. 55 . 31 1559. 7 . 0 1 . 75 . 44 1761 . 0 . 0 2. 00 .52 2012. 5 . 0 2. 25 . 58 2264. 1 . 0 2. 50 . 64 2515, 6 . 0 2. 60 ' . 97 2616. 3 . 0 2. 70 1 . 55 2716A .0 2. 80 2. 30 2817�r 5 . 0 2. 90 3. 11 2918. 1 . 0 3. 00 3.41 3018. 8 ^ 0 AVERAGE VERTICAL PERMEABILITY: . 0 MINUTES/INCH SPECIFY: F. - FILE, N - NEWJOB, P - PRINT IF/OF, R - REVISE, S - STOP ! � � . �WAr10A» � �� � ^- ,~~ , m�' ��� «��� « ""- �� ^ «~~ ���� � SUMMARY OF INPUT ITEMS 1 ) TYPE OF FACILITY: VAULT 2) STORAGE DEPTH (ft) : 2. 50 � � 3) VERTICAL PERMEABILITY (min/in) : . 00 4) PRIMARY DESIGN HYDROGRAPH FILENAME: a: t100 5) PRIMARY RELEASE RATE (cfs) : 1. 07 � 6) NUMBER OF TEST HYDROGRAPHS: 2 TEST HYD 1 FILENAME: a: t2 TARGET RELEASE (cfs) : . 30 TEST HYD 2 FILENAME: a: t10 TARGET RELEASE (cfs) : . 64 7) NUMBER-OF-ORIFICES, RISER-HEAD (ft) , RISER-DIAM ( in) : 3, 2. 50, 12 8) ITERATION DISPLAY: NO � ENTER ITEM NUMBER TO BE REVISED (ENTER ZERO IF NO REVISIONS ARE REQUIRED) : O � INITIAL STORAGE VALUE FOR ITERATION PURPOSES: 7983 CU-FT BOTTOM ORIFICE: ENTER Q-MAX (cfs) . 45 DIA. = 3. 24 INCHES � L MIDDLE ORIFICE: ENTER Q-MAX (cfs) , HEIbHT (ft) . 32, 1. 2 - DIA.= 3. 22 INCHES TOP ORIFICE: ENTER HEIGHT (ft) � 1 . 8 DIA. = 3. 64 INCHES PERFORMANCE: INFLOW TARGET-OUTFLOW ACTUAL-OUTFLOW PK-STAbZ STORAGE DESIGN HYD: 1 . 75 1 . 07 1 . 07 2. 50 2934 TEST HYD 1 : . 74 . 30 � . 29 1 . 06 1250 TESTHYD 2: 1 . 20 . 64 . 59 1 . 78 2090 SPECIFY: D - DOCUMENT, R - REVISE, A - ADJUST ORIF, E - ENLARGE, S - STOP � � • ------------/rri----------- • I • Om DATUM: III raw 19es J R I BENCfIXARK:an OF rMA74iN 9Y/2t90 3 I/2'BR/lS5 0�C STArFED'arY OF RENT( / I LIGHT POWER VAULT/EBB.VAULT LOCAIFD Zi THE SOUTH SDE OF SUNSET BM. VEST 10 ------...-7 . THE OF T IN ERSECTEN OF SUNSET BM. AND RAKER AVENUE SOUTH. • ELEVATOR..31.84 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: //7 THAT R ORT101 a OOYE1iMENT Lots 11 AND is SEC110N le. SW 4 C e / X.\\..... WTOIWISHP 23 NORTH.RANGE 5 EAST.1lUi..MG COUNTY. 910Rf LANDS RamEN ri,E aaE1 Nla vaELE"rcOlBim 0 a�F RENTER• /. I PUBLIC LANDS.SEPTEMBER 29.1938.DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS iv "OPERTY LI • 333.70' // \ �A7 DE souTEAsr CORNER OF LOT 24 BLOCK 10. - Wilf , _ nol _ Jr \\ THENCE EARNCE EA TDN.-29 F ET T TO E PLAT THEREOF RECORDED i �- ��.,.+� ►�'^ .�.��i�i �._�'' < �_ �w ► lbw.1� N%DUNE l4 OF RATS PAGE 7,RECOFDS OF SAD COUNTY; DENT£EAST eai29 PEST m DE EASTERLY NAROH OF 14AP1E ,„.....„*"--, ). , �-� �-� !��-����--t����.rn_������' PONT51IL(FNING; T RAKER BOULEVARD)NA TIE LNG PT E BEGINNING; TIERCE NORTH LEVAR EAST E TRUE r �r ' �A SAD MARGIN 227ER MA; IN TO EASE PONTTHE INTERSECTION TH IQI -V CF 11E'WESTERLY NARON OF EDWARDS WAY; THENCE SOUTHERLY /®, e - \ L ALONG SAD OF BEON NG BE S AT; F PROM EST THE TRUE PORIT OF EONNNC BEARS VEST:1rF1KE EST TO THE TRUE PONT OF EpNR'�, ' I. \ nlil � \ AL50 KNOWN AS PARCEL 2.an OF RENIDN LOT LINE ADJUST- , ` LENT No.LLA-062-90.RECORDED UNDER RECORDING No.90110190 a*c_w #41r �� 4 \ \ilk A , 1 / `• RECORDS aF lwG COUNTY.gA$I�N:TOIL 1,441P, / pg. r if \ *., lippr ..1\ lit, 4 ' ar ir, . Ab \ • „..„.„ ," „,\ \\ \ , , ...._ .,._ %. i , „. , . „, • .. , , _ .., ..„,„. ,, ,,o/....., ..... .., „.., „,, , • . , .. •0 \ . 41VIIMI ", ./,': , \../ '4• 4/411/' • itti , t. ' : -,\,/ ,... .,:, ilir ��/ � •,• ��� %, Q' III' C.O. (ht. " \ \ /\3 / )\411181\\\,. \‘\.\\.: ' .:!:.\ -57 50.97 f \�/ r''•'1' ' \ / II 111 la .- 11111111111 lip:. -7.741170sor,;11111 .....,, '''-' C`Cie ; 1 r ill, , ,:i 47., ../.'. >A//,,a•.,...,.,•i,'•, / r/- /t A-'‘.ii:A-i',,i•4,)1t\..., 9Ai' p a_r'\4,,1-1,4 1 1,;.‘..r,`/-,--'• ,..'/.,, 1111.. v V .,_N.\.. 4-I C.O.ir_..........,A i/_W_AL .IL/ IP'-IAlltinirirdAMWArIZal-'e- AlIV•"AI W:i1V.A1W_A.%A EN • ! E •f _r _ _ C.O. ►.• �\ 538.28' _ _ _ _ - PROPERTY LINE 71 `, S 38 Ri CB TYPE 1 ` �f RIM 23.8E '' �q I.E:19.56 12"OAP(N) ,L. ,_ I.E. 19.41 Tr CMP(S) /1/9 / . • E%C8 TYPE I ,'I66 ‘54 AMPRIM A 33.14 I E.-30.39 8"PVC(M) ate : I If lie 4/0' GRAPHIC SCALE 20 0 10 20 40 I I I I REV NO D.z OrSCATPTUN wPR (DI liar) I—r . 1 ImE-.410 R D 111 ORROVY—y-VaJLi E ■Yv. SCHERI HOLES ,C-\1 T1 s0��f)• 1215 CKENT. WASHINGT AVENUE SOUTH. N 9803217E 133 6510 SOUTHCENTER BLVD.. TUKWILA, WA 98168 .I,. �6= PHONE: (206)1354-9344 (FAX)854-6663 c PHONE No. (206) 248-2471 OZBOLT APARTMENTS 'f�; a ` +4`a Q IDE'°. oPL,,,URVE T,° omen Uri—MY PLAN".�• --- ASP 1' -d0• I"„`9612000N.DWG Trapezoidal Channel Analysis & Design Open Channel - Uniform flow . Worksheet Name: OZBOLT APARTMENTS • Comment: BIOSWALE DESIGN Solve For Bottom Width Given Input Data: Left Side Slope 3.00: 1 (H:V) Right Side Slope 3. 00: 1 (H: V) Manning's n 0. 7;50 Channel Slope 0. 0200 ft/ft Depth 0. 7.7; ft Discharge ' 0„ 0 cfsZ-2-die /i6-DEU ea Computed Results: OAK. F RA76- Bottom Width. . . . 2. 77 ft Velocity 0. 24 fps Flow Area 1 . 24 sf Flow Top Width 4. 75 ft Wetted Perimeter 4. 86 ft Critical Depth 0. 07 ft Critical Slope 4.4841 ft/ft Fr-oude Number 0. 08 (flow is Subcritical) 44)/2E0 culh9c ARP, fOj 2cn ' siAmeE = 4.• 75 X2Gio= 9S o -7-Or wpm Fo1e /A ' s(AMC F = 9So�/00= 9,:;5.. p £olT0fri w/OTN REQV/2Ev = Trapezoidal Channel Analysis & Design Open Channel - Uniform flow Worksheet Name: Comment: BIOSWALE DESIGN Solve For Depth Given Input Data: Bottom Width 8.00 ft Left Side Slope 3.00:1 (H:V) Right Side Slope 3 .00:1 (H:V) Manning's n 0.927 Channel Slope 0.0050 ft/ft Discharge 1.75 cf s E- ice- yR Pa Si FEZ/ frf(7W- f9 K fio cJ ,eA-TE Computed Results: Depth 0.18 ft Velocity 1.17 fps Flow Area 1.50 sf Flow Top Width 9.05 ft Wetted Perimeter 9.11 ft Critical Depth 0.11 ft Critical Slope 0.9224 ft/ft Froude Number 0.51 (flow is Subcritical) ,L2oi<DE F2ee-150 fiLLrL� � / mg. SA I /, 5 ' Pe-�P �TsfG Open Channel Flow Module, Version 3.41 (c) 1991 Haestad Methods, Inc. * 37 Brookside Rd * Waterbury, Ct 06708 OFF-SITE ANALYSIS LEVEL I DOWNSTREAM ANALYSIS FOR: OZBOLT APARTMENT SITE PROJECT NO: 96120 CLIENT: SCHNEIDER HOMES, INC. 6510 SOUTHCENTER BLVD. TUKWILA, WA 98188 DATE: NOVEMBER 11 1996 1, ar 18268 I° I tT P t OFF-SITE ANALYSIS TASK 1: STUDY AREA DEFINITION AND MAPS The project site is located within a portion of the Southwest Quarter of Section 18, Township 23 North, Rance 5 East, Willamette Meridian, in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. The property is between Maple Avenue S.W. and Hardie Avenue S.W., and is north of the Plum Tree Park Apartment complex. An apartment complex with associated parking is being proposed for the site. The property is approximately 2 acres in size and is mostly covered with short grass, some trees and brush along the property lines. Existing ground generally slopes f om the northwest corner to the southeast corner of the property. Off-site runoff from the single- family residence north of the property enters the site along the northern property line and sheet flows across the site. There are no off-site runoff entering the site rom the west, south and east sides of the property. Runoff collects in he existing ditch along the east side of the property then drains into the conveyance facility within Hardie Avenue S.W. which consists of 12" QMP pipes and catch basins. The stormwater then travels southeast along Hardie Avenue, then southwest along the Burlington Northern Railioad, then south where it drains into the conveyance facility within S.W. 7th street. • MAIMIIIL -B • . . SEE ...- P . . • J 656 • ...: -• -, 1,,, i____ : ,,,,,_ ._ • , 0“,_._ 5, _ ,..,....,,j,,, ,,,.. s ;12390-17i ' • .'s I , _. ' '1'5-* !i c''','eff ."e NE 611i LI PL. tg 1,%. i • _V_4....2__ S ; )6 Ir.ANIN: 1...W4M 1 , ,,3.,, .... , , :tx, WINO . ,„ 0, E 411WIA 6TH .1- 1 --i * .. • - ,es\ -- 7'n - 0 sc\74 ., fr i< , I, • 1- !,,,,A ,,,,,fi,„ Emma"— ! 1_ ,.•pi. - mu. ,,-lif n-i ., • . „ AV NE .r, . i z NE 5TH sT; I 5S__HISTH ST L, , .-4 1-1 t&i-a. 7ti'6 5" ' ''A BULIP:EF:7, SIESEIMI uf lit st's 4\-.NE x „„ 4 - SE _JAD__IL 2 Gle IX 1 ,,c2- axis _ . _ , ., ...., s,-,128THQ ST i)..„, 0,44, , I 4TH L_ sr I :sli, 1 _ _..... • •.,1 0200 ST . > cryi sT A9.'9,111;1 ge‘ ST_ Wilirj#8411.11."'4"11111i.f imp NE 1 .—, qmAt/I:i NE 3RD PL .E . 1 \ .„ 1111,0 IFF7+3,9°.'- ut s ERY, • 41 . . • •li.• I I 4-1 SE,; s1.1.H.,,i ,.,..,. ,...,. ) .`" '' 1 Aa;1' - TN ''N AIRPORT WY -':: 1 ,,,,, 3V , !..24 sE__ I 131ST ;_. ST__.,' zi; Z", z• - sonf I , NE iiiiii. out any 1 i tg NEI L'' ''' SE 1 ' 132ND• ST . . I .:i s tgs zr S ' VICTORIA' "I' I 4 IST1,3 4," S '. ''''''j i ! •- .t. '-' KM t. MINT I A , ' ,& , ,_„, ,, •,..4...aQ! ST i , 1 ,,y- ii.ii __2...44„il s ! • , ST sy:b.71. RENTON, s, II. . a, . i OLIVET 1 g 16 ?,'; ____I : Hi, 55.s.1:2 ,:' El. :-i--• 2 I I 'cti ok Nit . sr • -" .2 vo v ; i'•• '----------:‘,, ..., - _____*,_.A r::.-...,.. /7 ,,, SE ND Li PL 1 SE 1 Di6TH; . ST 1" • - 1111Ebtfirili, V4 -1:::-_-\, , 1 1,6,q.`tr RENTON . •• - ' , ,. _ ----.\-,...__a______..., .4,_, __. ....,.. s -4 IN g RD i ., --.irgoark 1 ,'',:, - bil PARK rl,'`,"-•-s.:.305.til . Sij Livi----40g1 RENTON le, ..%' 3r11111E1 i i I s> 1 (! N P 1 ,.N.L •Ce 1 sI.'•'.A":„,,,,- . M.) t3 Vila / ..1,('•66., . •,:i..'VL-•,(,,,,4 '1',,<•`..`, ra„...,—..,„,,, CENTER \s," ofoll -AI -0 sy,.-.•+' (,.. SE 4. %-.3' i- f 4 tri. ...05,:trimpg,, vivit- • ,, , \,.. .. Ai 'Ilk' 4'• ..-t filialltt , 1.• - 11.. , •I , .., . \:--••••., '... ,.,'sr,. Al4PLEWOOD --7: / 142ND ST L' < .-----L__Iiki__147,1P iir: ‘; ' - ST • '''', 6.• : __,......,.......„--7 /•, ,.. ..,.1 . I, g ; . , -.L....,,e3- -,... , GOLF ..^,:‘:rf- 144TH'S.:A- -i ST.t°•C, A RIDE ,c01 *14$,, jy,_. •.. joi,„ ,,,_ _ .•,. .-0 , ,, _... -___.. , ... COURSE I,_—_2...'__ .....:51,x \--t:••, R',...r--1 'I si 14i-f.'„7.., 4'' . )) RiTEL PAIILD ••• ••4, \ ..... II W ch) . 1 51 A 50‘401 ‘" • S ' vs S RENToti VILLAGE PL,...7.., S 11Th ST • Ce.94R Rfoce MAP LEWOOD! \--'?,„,,7 : ...---,--„-,....' ,4 ,,., „ I 1 •• ,...,- - -- 7/ A 11114410 5,4111L)L -:-4/0- .° :--- 'ZrOrf. --,:064-in N•• i 4 4. IN.07",ICIP. 4, / \‘• 7 ' 'C'•teS -- ‘,6 . SW ' ilmu ., . = . 4,,„ ••••. _sir, C.',s..'4-e; '. Av - i' f2...* ! 16TH ST a i ,; ''.. '`‘e .0.,,4‘•'''' 5'rt-Ll .A ItIll- t. \•,\ ',, * ,q 6:1:: , ---- 1...Skr . PARK . i 0.,tn A: .t , g • 16TH ST .11, • 1 0 S 16TH ST c§''''S t N 4 , c30E • ,1'4,,, lb 6/:te s ,• .. _‘em,'-i 71,1, • --5— -i---t7,---- ---i----E. r,,- .1 s . , ,3- --1- 494. sE E'EE1N o, O' :I E• '•, • ,, -1 • ' "...- ._......,._...__,AILis,- --.____ 7.' i g ux. ...,2 la 2-17Trivrf- ‘,..,.. ‘ '"C04. sr ,i• .r,5,r. ',5,'. 47; J.e. ,,,04',4)).,.,, I -ri. i '74; •:. RD i• A SW I9TH ST 1 '71.4 0 ,' 1 ST . t I .. S 19TH LGWCACRES .3' ?"4PL la t '3' ' S 1 ,,„ •-_ o.:,.Ta ‘C'' ., `''',.• ' 4. - .. %, 4, •• ..... '"vros 4-'4., u ::: s-§ov9- , RACE 1 E''' „,„, , ,, , 4, „__ < _ SW 215T ST , r- Z z; -,k PUGET 'R,-;• •-• : u, 416,E6,.,,- 4 10,-A ‘,..A.1 -,,I '`,,- .<4; ...4 „,-7?..,-...1,4§2,.._... `7,,,,,, 0E' TRACK n 5' -4 71 -• v si ?at. c•-•,.s., ,1 •I.• : :•.- .e- .e.., L7,r,,, .„,•• : Ls6,11•\,,,6 st P ...1:' .-• . , -. ,/- .•,.\'4".(''' ...*•1..,_'' x , c o „c„..•L._ dgl,,,,,,,,,,.:D,t SE 2IST ST,,...,4 --:,...fe'J.,,A... ,,,, :7.! si ,,,t,,,,:.?:-..,:;.-1°_ __ i. ,,,..,,,,i1..;ii SW 23RD 1ST , 5 23RD . ;r-,--- sAvs,. ,:s_rj:., .1,.. .. VICTORIA •••? . ..' 1. : 162ND;11••11 ST 'A. :,..; 1 ST S,T 64 SE 15E LoajiLl.e.r4Uulli..`•°.‘ tv." SE 15a--Pr.sc- LAJ 16IST PIS, fe.,-7, -s-, „?,. ,_ _,. 4.0 -- _ - 4... SE_161STa.;9...SE 160.N s., .‘„,,_ . ...,... •- n< •'o 1-4;* 1 ; '; : 16416 -2 21 ST '''c.. SES E16391164sTT: sTIL'IL'''''.--1 ,94- 7,14g tiliIri '' S 27TH ST:4 ,Se6,E SW 27TH._______________ sr 7 . i,..,55-•ev.„ - '*..••••,...;•J1:,:, 2.:,,,, Nir. .1 L..' ' SE 165TH '(,<'',4, ,.Si. 1651-11 ST 4, sE SE 16STH 3;SE 164TH • ir64`, erl'-'7 ,..,,..r,,,ri• St I s- ,_ SP''`Al t-." .%": -. ' ,7_1.,s.111,7,,-y, . • L.E 166TH allh, 'zgni ST Z ' tt4 "Z sT -.re. ,.°,.i,-,:ta 4..3. .,,IrLi TT 0 .... V''.. %E_. 166TH ST i. ..,,E .FAIRWOOD 1-4. Irt N•Qt_i sj-r z. '17,...‘;`..l'i.:' SW 29TH ST 73 tps,,46,p s,.EE L6 ST SE I67TH ST : 1 SEE 1.66.TH pt 4 g, i.j., N j'. ''','sE, 167TH ST f 6 qli: - .7, . :,-4,zi,,,si, tif,=!! ,‘ •,,,4 ' •LINDBERG' ;'-',,v1 , fli HS 4 +' ,z,4.- , '..-'?!--z•-?!5',s - s ° -...`t-1.•. • SW 30TH 1 '... ____ SE /SE 166111 PL .4•4,. se')4,....i ,. e; \..., ....§111111ST ST 3IST ST ig, St ...., _,__LA. i1.' sT''L ,u, ... g -, 21 :r-••1' ' EE Et,,,A' ,40- P•;`:7-‘1 D sw MO ST y MST:r,,, C,!..:11-r 4\Y,`"241.1 r - - ._. — . E.s.-- ''', :: „,., > ..i..4SE 169M ST STi& ' g SE 169TH .• l--',-; '''. ...o ''''' 1..iq75, ,,,'" MPIN 4 5t 17; i El SE.F1s70TH. sr sE 170171 :IT: ST ''•. -4, ,,•$. zn- < ''', •a ..__'sE 169M Pl. se, z , ---<,,,,,,)21, , '°' *'',. ---- : SW 34TH ST g. - 2 ••:t -jj m ST -,=• . .• 4>. 'e., ' 91' •1-,., 65E170Th sr 0.,,,)— • • • ' 9. ra x .4, RENTON s \\1,...,'P. .-, . 172ND Zi: , II. up ...•••:.'= ^•,- ,-,-, -I.-- 5, ...- Inst it,/ r. = . 1/4,,gu:i712.1124, SE.V.1,16.ST.. -* . . ,a.„, ,,,_-:. ,T., Pi SE 171ST l'ARK-ss.p.2.9.5.7....., !..% 'SE - 17 NDA, Ac ST p i. st inn,_se.E.•LIB '''' 1••-•--C-- " • -S.';,4„.„ ''::if! -? 1-\.• — --„S 5.3,9rn tt- FS . SE t'41f75'T .11 "t:4 ......: PL I fL,,,, rFsi-. x -• SE 171:1:_,PL 4Sr FAirail:, g sw 39TH ST ' • Er •-•Ak7 ,., Is .,,,A - .1 4,-AK_Zirt____sE Q..4.. SE - is:7'4 /,„,,,0 - 37.3Rop, •.,, :7 1 ' t''",,---s-T ., x 176TH ST S; :t :•.t,/ ''''''I'' — (5E.176TH sr, 909-,i0 liSY-1- SE'-'6'-'--747' SE '''',r WURRY '-:;,.. '' ,k, •I ,?:, - I SW i' 41ST ST VALLYE . , HEDICAIS I MU Cy M., RI 9, C°,‘.T.' C't '';1 . .;'',.• § .L-' 21,,,,, ,,,.: _.,St t ' I\ ' CENTER - ' 2 C,1,9s. -''. •'•:.' 1. .' .':,' . - -'9:':, ,1,/e ; •-_-„-,/ \ 76, 11 • dia0 k 7-s \ ". crik 1 dye\ L it"d �"r �ti qi �� c.f.; \-4 r . • 9.410 4% "II iedoti.r% "5.46 • i b , . 1 .' 4.1 kil /z$- a .,.�---r %. N . �a� It" iiiiirifir M �v - tI \....s. • ) 0 S ffl, I I'' 1348.{ . -. of ,,. % o /It �.`' aid + ,• �•��+. '06 - . flit kr' . • 4f 'It 2. rt: 16.4 •` t . \IL I 'i Ate 1 ' \-•.4 .. . S67a�28 i,39.7.- '$ ' . 49 SA iP - la beb y �yrta. ',. N z-?3��� -A 70 t Es —3/•-4 e- $57•s43 \ZsILl4.3D Ails y.taf r Av. �IIIIII%l;- _�/ `L� U� / // v , -'\,--- \�` --fir - 30 3rd. �X 29 AVE--- u ..., to dtA ir le.- &a...4a/ Nil QM • . I,,0 ...:_,_-a—i —1_, c_i f i - 0 2, 1 ■11if• , \ , 1 \ \ 0 I _ , / 104! 179 Q ��1 .1. o.... 1411/1 */` 1 etli ) ! \ : :7 . \—‘1 ill f --j 1 , 0 ,._ \- - 1 . \ \ P- 011 53 fir , - \ .\ I ,..,) li 'D 45 • ti-----.......} 1 1 \� \. "-- PLACE Aye 29 4/. /i/ i i' �'t.. 1 `� m \ \ \ \ /' ��� // 125 iiii. N X/126 it/ / -. 1> 1 1 //./Ai : r--..-• ‘... i \st _\ 1:::;:, 0 ‘ '‘.. ....,;7- i--1 _,,,/7--........„. t ► Il _ ♦ ire/M 86144,. . .4%*., i//I) // / \ \ \ sP % as 100 I • / /, , F \ \ // i M� // ' �` �\ \ \ i 28 ?Ll1127t ' 1nh/ ,Q ♦ ♦ 4 ` / / -„ iii.... X . ; �/ \\ • \ \ �O \\ \ X /ice .`��/ .77.(iiiiir II; lipl -::::.._ = i __:---1 "--- BLVD kil‘86 �� X 9T SUNSET _- - X/--% �' -=== • \ \\ 24 x , \ 11, A \ \ \ 0 L Q _ _-,tea a . // \ \ fc::: \ \ `P , , ‘ ‘, \ , 3, \ \ - -\ ° 0 'h �73 r 111_'/X=s2- ==_ '.-=,i /iI• Y%' ,0111 V`�, �- \\ \\ �` \ \\ \ \ \ ‘ . :1 -.. •-• * .114 r A ‘ , \ \ c„.., ,, ,__ T„TE ___ _____ __IP lir - BR ... -- -1 / meniiih.. saiiiimew .-.-._z.sc (39• p#IIP 03 , • Qi k k - I L.- • ‘ , \ \ te , \; ---- !k BR .... 27 cj - 23 X ``�� _ i /w IIIMP , r- \ \`)'��// ce'' s-r •'��� �,s // ito SCAT. TREES / 0 Lf-a \ WO A' �� \ ; , 9.... ---:-_-_it t 1 1 .\ \ cocov ,......---If.•:-..-10 t \ _iri 0 ,/ .-.�___ -,--40, X 22 /.. / \ \ \I \ 1—'1 / -------- % ______,.._----" --.. -- _ 5 i I NI\ 1111130 etz) Atip, i A , iiiii-• .-.. i . 1- ' - . . % 1 1 ` ` , ii/ / S S 48 <5\-\ 1 1 a I: ' ``:__..- 26 \ X 2 1 1 0 l 0 35 • \ \ / EARLINGTON GOLF COURSE 2O :4 �,� ' 0 \\\ ; e1---\(-7:::-S ; '7'TPQ ,= - ' /X16 \\ x / kl 'SAGE. �N= ZO• !/ / J X 28 1 ::1 Vii. . X 21 / x28• I L\�__�� /// , A X19 \\ ~.1 i--X23 l'/ , r 21 TASK 2: RESOURCE REVIEW The 100-yr Flood Plain map shows that' the project site is outside the floodplain area. The different Sensitive Areas Folio Maps are also attached and indicates that there are no identified sensitive areas on- site. Per the attached U.S. Department Of Agriculture, King County Soils Survey map, most of the site soils are classified as Beausite gravelly sandy loam (BeC) with the remaining portion classified as Urban land. The other King County resource maps do not cover this area, since the site is in the City of Renton, and is therefore not included. • °—�°CITY OF RENTON z z ".a"! r.%', ;;1'F_ - Ic-c \ y......%j 1.-,,,,r,.:- Ir,..7.7.-. .V-E':' ' 530088N 4 ' ,,, z CORPORATE _ 30 3 •.., LIMITS —7 _ ;: Z W O Z r: w cn W w I 7 •' : w Z ili J tu 3 ;, . I p \ • I`. W Z ... cc" J W .t' V~J Q I ,zz...,,z,muii.:A71;......L':';' . : ,. st-' ' CITY F:RENTON KING COUNTY I UNINCORPORATED AREAS lopp, OL 530071 1 _ KING COUNTY RENTON _ 18 W � uT yw `_ CO RP iz E - ti >i �9'VG ��LIMITS i S�ti ��_ I ND J to * ,......................_,.... • Q 0 i .-A. / .c Fl OULEVARD , Y ZONE X • St T AlIllMFEMA A . SCA.E: I" = Soo Q lit v to / • s. .. , . —;)4114 ;i l: ,T_ : L r= ,-- • ' r_ t. • ft• I . .. . . I 1 ckt:,' ,4,, '. iliglig,-- . HP -f4,....W.: , „, i . . . ,..—•—•• , ' I . . -•I i:-.• +OA ... : c. ; , .. '.=--//a .7.4041tip,‘•,--=,:f.-?' I • /) 11 • ctl t -.�_.._ .-/� .. - .o.,.. ._..:—.,....11:S..I.-7: . \. . ...—:.;•,'.1 —— :•''''''.1. ••*';'-.*—.'"4...—.',—;:. . .4 r...., �,�— !'•-: 'er.traiihr.,.eiki.7 41"*IntsV"T-', .7*. • ,-,. "'•-`7J-s/„.'i; ? :.,--.,,,,J7 .2-, , iii.......06 -; a t:r ,:� �t ,-i !F f' J� }i} 1) • I. 1-�'''' y /� BRA ��E 1f gear: ?Y .1„r 1. -.iv, '" ' /'. . ,,..,. ., .. 7--. I . !":. 1:f."N',IL., --''r:.'11 ' . --,--• z.-.. 'L ,'":.'''''....Lam'''. r"ve Ikr"""! -- 44-01.....a.• , 71 7 - __ /4' y ,� 1 - I _ vet 6'ea �tY• -: )27.".,\<.7-._ ':.--r-r---'7-A....- ' "•-`-''','-',`''..``.-7 • ' -LI ...-- \ 1 '\, r-'7 ' .01.1*.;',.r.::::','‘ at, • ..4-.rriflin - 1 1 l' I �'Pr 111 Q' ;:k4 IQ r• yy psi .>,; r. /,-__ -�^ `�� L•S I. =`s e re:. • or,i. .I. .. _ '\ _ . 1 ;.,,.... r 1:cfit •L 1 ! f.'•) \A€`' i1 ��// T -'r1 ,�t- I r • -�� :.,III '..,,'• , h� .: :,• -..• . 6 '. ' , :. ..- •. .... .re:_' ';f.J. :•C11;: .++,rr •t s.trv;j' .�Z4:r,•Y-'''•y,, -•.,. ."ti` A_ggie1• :f'. on = .4 .TQ Y.' n•J;`^- , ,, Zia•-:_•": � i v/ J '1. i �-. r-tt ~M1.�� --.n r _ p r • I i.=,/t F.�J \ ::i' . -r�----�"'~ f I I ' -t G..1 . ':k l.ti .'-,q `, '• ti. /.--1----'; SAS.•. -r�� i. 1:- ,F� &"••• `-1 rvc•r--I '..• -. %. `:'...,;*1, A 1(147:,,r, ,, i.,.__..:: i.. .. , , .,,,.„:, , , ,.:_. , ill ‘,..-1 '' .• ,t _IV .,, . , 1.. iiii ..._ _ /(kn••)1 -..n. n..), 1-..\-, n • ' i --:-..,..Q__ • • ).•. , •.,.4. t.-: Y tttt6� .. s� .� I t '� loto, f., �t• 71- Y .- • - re I Fiji.. .; ;X "1 , ¢ �'. :1 ry :.gin11. 11.4. ;`.• _ ,. ...,I . .; • .. ▪ • r.:•-- <� � ��� / 'Awl.. .��,'�" `• . ,ti��' ss �.1, :�:`,�_� 'IL { - ' likk I j.- m� 1= r,„. �},-. ,= • i 'en. glom:. • �. _ .") tilior s'''.k,*'• , - 1',2.•---:. .1:: ;3.-''.''',.- . •'=" ‘. \. .: 1 .' .1.••: 7 ....' 4,,,, • 2'1 ficipr i iiir. ''',..i, ciii,:f..",) -'.:.•..:1• :,-.r.i'r." .411greitl.,'.. t _., 1 ... lg.., ,.,..,.... • iqw.dosireiN •11-,,,.:„,..,,,,,_, ,..-.;.:..,...k._.::-..--k-- --.:....,-......:, ....:_...„...,,,,.... .., i r 1 _.. .. -,to,..„,t., 4 \ ''NI% ••• .e ,. -,..,: .11, ...-4,,Lgk‘‘ ;7 ...,'• .. , . • , ::; , alb ..,'N --..•:. '.\--E10 X- -;.."':.i.•"..!'ilta..,•.--'0 . ..-.• . Ailha '4..N. •••4 lift.-,;..;.:...i.ii..,-,v.Rt_ • ••••••.11.11111 ININ, Aritilrbrailiftlaiiiil. ''....'....-..... :--2 I) er , ,... 1 . ....,,,.,-. . • , . i:,, , ••01-.:11 s•! 4, • , '1 I 11-11 hil. l'• :".‘".4.1.411P4A Taal .:::'1' .'.1.',-._ :, :,:ii , )1 °IL :...;"\''' ;.: ,t •%%0 ith,.AI 1 I NM/ e� � ' III.,, r ins Class 1 Duwamish 4 the Streams and 100- .--.--.-.� Class 2(with salmonids) I rIs• Class 2(perennial;salmonid j:2 i i 7 F--i Year Floodplains - , i -:,, v �+ use undetermined) SCALE: /"r. /l//LG Class.9 9 i14 ' 5::to.1 , UnclassifiedL"u- ,6 t 1 , � I 12-y-- _ • ���Y�h{� 73 4 r�= ?. < "r' ya st o Li'.l� -��-fa^ 1`�`-jl 'itt d,r£. t � .'� ,•`� -"__ 1 ��Ir��ti'��. ' - �� '''C �' !f..�. �.1.� , r {, •v .' is 3:_ 3• 'I,a,A'7' I.y }1 r„y,.,+..c. \. 1 _.J 1 • '"f: I-.wv!..p :�1r�...y',sC: ; *...' ' r 1 r-+� ?.\31 4 41 " �n �.'�11 . -. .L�� ',.! ~.,, � `•� •{ a'+• ' .- �•J' `�=..7�1. .._ 1 _.( vl �F •52'tti4' f �'iri'� �.,u 1'� � 1� l .1-•. .h' f, i -I ! YV' • 6 M-5',.ij.-. .+''$1 n f� *i' ,r.Nl �:- S I I �\ 7 i' Sc -- <•• :. I---L �` , .'<...�rR.y% , ti+n . rw 4t�.t .{ �", i , t ! t -. ?.4 ;r '4' 1 )yr-v,,,-:, • r {l•1 "F y: j(1'1 1. .!} ,k - r{ y t 'Jj,... F ,/F 1i 5 :'"- it 1 1,-_:-. _fy:7 I+ `[, .,1 ' : 1 tr r t, J 1 t,' 1."{ • # ] ir`Sxe \ 3 r n t et fJ• 1�— . + ,i • I j ( "pV �_8: --� s L 1'.,r�,t �,,,'r i � 1 d,-\4^' tj �eyr�'± •) .:'� r i �� • ' t�� � ' 1{tIQ _ 7}_,- � '.. ^ �t ti� `* axK"t^f 1 r`K t � J • . r.'-' ; .;'`._ �. t K � I'Y , �Q 1 r t'f t-T'� i' 1 \t , 1'.. ' 7• H.;`l :its 1 t '4rti + t +, � �, �_ { .• zi'\�4 � i� Tom, s�. /r' 1` •4 -' �° •'! / L_ > --,$,,lJ\y. ' ;-,A,;;; !1 ' fist IS„t Merced:I:i� s.r,,- Y "' 1 /1 �! 1 •`c•` i, JP �s t"J='7, f 'Y.1 .'1 of ,�?�,�'7,^g;••1 •• rt / I I ',.rG • ,„...1._,,,fiv ,,,..,.,,,,,1-::,*:.5..1,,,,s.. ...;• •' , I 3 - ,.. Vilr''Xiiii..-,5•.-".--P- ----.-''.. - • .1 • a ,11 -, __-i i , •..�• 4t rrc..c-5 A�tf�`tt- \1 l�' O i`l_ I _ ... {= ry t • y Y Y .., 1 - ' s t,s. }�- :I • • r.Sti+l a -, I,. . t l�R t ., Tb�r 7 yf�^ o. "'�,J! , s t 9 if �r �`'a^. -::, ' I I •1 1 � .�-y.. 7' ' 1S.xxxssttr �xv ft. , j t • n - 7 :I' r. 5 tilJ.',.'0 t 4•4•1••.1 !,,r•L 34 f � 2t_,• .. ~' ie. '1'=•V.-12 • • u -:- :' ', t_____ ,,i:tr�� ` Fsas��l��y a�kT �a4 5 rn�tY � AIL 1^_""! •44( .•I J� i�. �28b .,... -.- .„,._:,1:;.--.:-.....-__-:._.:A.... ____,- : i. • ••••_._ ..„ ._._ ,_____________________ , _ _ ._ ,„•.4,,..,:, ,_,, ,-„,,,,„,....x7.4..,..y4:,;frt.-z._,::;i„,x_r.::,,...,,,,,,:i_pri.;: _r_kw,„...:1::,:;11,,._.,...%,:,..._,....•.t,-, ; 1 7,___..r.:-:::: :._--fs-L: • -----.- ,,. . . , ..•,,..,.. .,,,. ,.. ..:. i .'y\S lire 2x1r.,,t.at•�j$,� k- .r d .vi,°13r.S7 .4 '• `, I• tl '- ., • .., . . ,.i- _r, ----J.,- t �.,,((1• ' _. piai,_' t� '1 • • ) J i _ I• 1 s5c Y x Y is ct=y 1 I ;' 7• = y s 1 I -1 1. -,.,..,\-,1..i ,, �- "-�•s, 7 J5'^ -.zi' ..��rr ,,, AI I_++-. - ,•-.._t�I'1 f• • P :...„ • ...,_...._„.„ :.: �. '�•e,s�- .fi it� resiJ�•.' Y.._ . _I;. • � �.J •---�"'' c{,•: '^L1 -. �. - • .I••T.I .-?t�: .� _ 1 ^^� i...r. i— _ 23b 21b'J t. ..a ...„.\,_•-....,. :7: - .__:, .• . • _ ). a.-:..;_ I :`•,11 1 • I F t}7i:11�• ,.,; •;, is,G -. _ • --' .t 10b•' AR ' ' SS4r��J '� • I _ c. ,4„....t.. •Jam'J l ` ,•` j ', 4 6; ...:;r.': F_''Lower..Cedar 1 - -�. .. - , .` am ...• Ti i'_._4.:.-lff,_., 5 _4 ` _® \yam..: 3•. 1- z :i: .'''"r'1'flE:;--,. '../r r1/i.3&.,• „ , ! tip 111,. 1 Iv V piI = F — _ 17.:1-:.,•':-..712J L-.E.:n.t. t.. .. .' , •3 . : : ! �t% f ,i. j -I ; -- v r,1 4 d � I �•Y • • , • 4,liz 004 i-.2. •- • •Wetlands --1 Wetlandsel Duwamish 4 -• , O n Water 1� 1t3�, aa� Basin Boundaries _ , 14l i '(u 5. .10 J Sub basin Boundaries 6�'i2 . 1 • •I ,4=‘,11,-.7 1. .,...__F-....•41.),ii;10,*-. ..a k----A.-4:4, :.\ ?of 1 L L:I . n 7 .:y�U;k :. a S}� ,...1.:127_,--.,,,,...„ ''S ..• ,sf J,.1.- 4911:• .., :.,,t --i•—t- -- oe u. .,_--P4 ••-•-',:, ; . I ./ ';,. ..*ftok...-,...-,,„ ./7tik - .., • c',„ ,ii 0.3 i gavib, . . i ' . j tri"'s-,..:-. .:.ra A ...);,1-\. ".,:: • ii.,,, , -4, ,-,:,,, ...,„,,,;_f.,., ,,,N.,. • -•- .,, \-"b • -I--` / �1 .�-y Y� ILni%.;• i, .Yt" .'S _..I , \, 1� 4,..n„'1 1 I it: a . ,, • ,.$,A.‘... -lriv,.„,..,;:•:!.. -,.--,'- s$� °/' ,+ I ;"� . ...„.`! ~r ..Ti I �jl t: 7:71" sue Iv ''1 fir "�., S Jay/ ';l/{t�" 4,,,,,,---':-1:::."'‘, .'-.7-7'...". `,`�� �' ': tip`--='�' "`" �` 'tc' ,. '"•`' • .F` • .� .� dik °=;ter,.':+ • . V�1 ti_;j;. II t k I} ., . _, 1. 'La_ I .le a./ 5..r \-.. .-:---1,," .77-._7_..4• .. .t ) ..,. .L11-_-_,,c,, ' .••• f i• •t---. 11- --; • ,i: a aim • 7,••:'-:-', ,,I1A :.. .\\-••:. _•.... ...„ ,:.r•.)--,,,,•• - . 1�1�, • , , E- .:,r,._ . i. ./),jt.,. ,.::. ,4.:4,t,......!. .,•! .... ... . ---:"...., :.-„....,,,pi-F. , .1:5_,-,,44,5,:,,,,:-.„,-..,0 -..". ;‘ . all :....:.1_,.:•:,..„,.:,,•17.,,,,'..:-:''::ei..,:._,. .,..:71,:-..,_:•.,,,,,t1 • ��! II_ c • ' Iola • •--:giviiV...7 7 '':':, : b•-:----",,.H . .'g..11=;:\:., 0 if? k,‘ `.( .-•--:-:.:.k1 .:'. .\.-4-,',..,.., .9,- i• . .__'. 4,.. Aft., • ? 1. irt4,1*-:1rlF� may r R' am I ni -.:',... -. •-nr),,, t . A . ! .„VI4 "5 a , , .11(ry �;, v ,. _.,_ . 1 'Aif • , . ,. JI LA I MY '� • Erosion 6-- s zar •s Duwamish 4 SCALE • /" - / Nll.E 4 V . 14I , ' ` P . r, T ---1. ) L.J • r.. ; -�4, i t T\ .I .-1 ) • tY—ice ' _ • ;: _. f,: :gill` • • ' \�\ 1 •._'.� ;• 1 . j r�—.`'�: . ;tom ,/.,, it___1.1.1.. tilig 1; ./ . ... - 1i . ::) 1 , ... . i \,11 �': a �'• • : ,. ,_. ., : • . ..„. .4. • , ., •-,..,ki -••• -,_ ,......,,, ,T,.,.•,,,..... • .t.S�i•T:.Y h�C•i 1,��_- o •._j _.,.11-__ I ` r I4 L_I.J14.y.-_._.:.. _ • - ..,:-L-1-::-1--,7r,f..•r..:'• .•..‘... V -` -•-s--,- .-...: :•'. ''.. -/ - ' Fe f :-, ". --„:-',A0 f,-.------'''.- '-'- - -. ' ...':• ..- •,. . 3 . ••\._ • ./ L1,t t - ...'..P.JQ:-,.. ----.\.r� �M1 1 Ve, :° .\ _t ii , <,t \. \N\.. .5s'„,c,.. . 3.,.... .1 ;Y 'y I I' ^Y • •'d l •... i '. I. t'\1�: ia.. '. :� ' ,1 }-t•ri-hL ..,. �f � � i+ Jif-f . y . _ 1 - ;_.2.r • JI ,,..i.,;,,,;,--.4.,..,, r l': •s\s''-,:t \l,. -‘..‘: -'.'-::• '',-,i7'•'''''14.'1' • : 1 A•il.;1;:I. ' :Li--;:ifr..1•.-•: '.. i.4-Eli. :Az--...--I; _I-;../.:...--: . rh- ..',1 .'-ii,-1 ___. - ,---.; L. ''''...:..... ,... , .;,,,.. .. ....\..,. I--4111 --1-- j. I .'. .1 I.1 i 1.1-1,4.. ./4.2i\ qs--''..,t4.3. : - :-, . ..;::-',-...,--.-k 1 t„,1., \.: ;t. g -4..7- dal .e� _, ..1._ '''; `1. (,R ' i H ., ., , . --\, :.,-.. . , r....,--, .. -- . --....--.0, -H,. .--, r7.•-•: 1. - - •• \ 1-1-Fif.!:11!..., .6:'-''-:-'...':.72:,,..;:i.:.I.„ri.... :.: ..',.-,...:-.. :-1. L-________I 1.. / 1`\i tt i ., - . Y` \ii, . -. .:,..'. •,.. • _ . 1 r ' ,,. ., . . .. .,-..)./. -,---ri c -1 • . . . . . 1 ,i ue kI. '.• ... ~ •: ,.` e . .. �� i }' - - ' s-\ Y 7., - --4 'Col \ ' .17 r --Tr-\'1 / _......, • r..., — .._ _ - \IP:1-1'1117/;.(--_•___ ' \ ' '' ,..-zi_ Duwamish 4ldnuslide Hazard . .. Areas ,2`�+-' ,3! , r :• �� / M/L.b' s n4 $QAL6: / Iu SUloj- f' ^tt 12 1.. • • • • • 1 •.._•p• - . .... .-. , r- .1- -it�{ v - , -r (,. t 1 • I• i /i , s M • :1 V V I i.,,,,ti___ t x :. ,• �A i • T L. - :n �:.y.T T ur" 1Ii /r. \ `. '1._;. 1• ,T: 4,4:2,---.. �jJ. .,.. I1. • ! / (- j1. �'.. I_ �, �.�` ,, :: ' • •J: LI gip_ �`_r-:-�— — _. _ r, :_ ,mo, - , .;,' .N y' .,a•7.•?i f r. I i • ''''' • ---,f :-_i_ :-&-_-:-.D.,_C-c-C-f_z:r-'-' 'I i v:‘ --1` 1---. •.., •-\/-1.;-_----::::: /II:'•..ME. II.. .::'s • • . .ii;14( .',,, iii.4.;.,:;;.. • ormrita _ mai ' '' '7r 1T Y.�_�• _ -��:.- '_,_�_� • I'��' !"!�' (rat + !�9 • ' V • t� �J- - rl rj. ,':. i7• 1'1V, 1 ` t a f„ , -3r,,,r. 'ty IC:. '',A" "1,--•• •.',..t....‘,,Y,A. , ' '''';- ..i..4';:f'-'--::.,-'...(••:•;4(;•;:r- ...:.--,,, - . ' . .• r---'7 • 111 Z.,11 J' • -. -• .,�. ...,-_• .: :/rJ' �-?- , —o 111 :. A� } _ . ... . ;,,.. !I:0,, ..ih.../ .:T...i,A•:.ei-F.::"\-:7if- •-• iin-A-Wk ..,-••• -...'•.eriii, itt..: V•T-5 . r ",... 91 \••••0._:. —. .- -....-..r1Afiritr.„' miiittkvir _ . .7 .r-:.: ;:.' ..,u.: 1 1 I -1 • •f 4*4.12,; • •;:'•'. ..V /5. • ,`; ... /,.?.... .!.'' '. ::. •• 4111rAill- -:. :'.' ..ilf, : .-...Z !)\h. 21 "1-- i ., ' I-- ~!rr r p + ,: - �1 -- �)�-.. e '..J t..- .. _.. .' r,Yl- -r . . ham. _ •:\.--- g A • }:?. '' �p :ri � - _ ^-.-r----.fir. di,� �. i ". .If .,�,' ,:< . % -'•. 3sL ',�• �,. _ ..�f µ.`. I. I'l : " ;; / . W..•' B it ' S l -_ ® ��' , �l'II n•. Ur k uostat i• ell—1 , d . Ca7 Ur Ili; �a :: Ki'I' • tC •-.: '.. .ss:-. •• , t : - II : es7g11 NE ol. , /1 p, ./ ...... • . , ;it .i:".4.j1 ,. . ____ _D . • < '''W.L'.4_4_11,,..+11._ _ .1 .t I i I \ \I--.a... -. , . T•• \—, t rc River : % 1,:.•la I A R•0• ! AJI I 1�r . ./. ..... iiiiiiiiimot... .. itta . ... ... Mk! NI kr-. \1,1,==,,,/millir.i-• 1 ;BM.iii Ary•----/-1 -.A,1416%- L ` ' r ' Pa 111 I 1 )(JP' \I\op �� Athleticr • ripyJ ��bsta' lit% I ,� Field !,.!1Eirwww/.. lwi �� I ;,-.--- _j." . ••••••• rAIRII ''' \ 4 f U .„i, ,,-', BM•• •... . ". • sss,•,BeD ........--• • ,\r ��4�0�KL i� itt411 EvC .w/. 254 Park D GRAM__ g fsolipii_., �, Be D 74 ram a M Norr ill i I , RA ROAD T4 1�‘11OF a �•© .a. /(Iilk :47_, \yNiiiitli‘. q 03---- Rq , 1/ISi. *j,,�'`,:/ / /y III ' WN ti:___ ,,,,,_.„ wo „..---:!%,....., goy 6 0. I.: I IWIMh �'mil— Wo SITE it 11111% /.1." —'141k Itk . ' • Pu tip):::f).. 131 .', +�" I BM 37•- urseii- I I i tst� AmC •�'- Ur 11 p, IFS ■ • F.I,- - it \\ -'--j'.i'a BM J"�• �' Sew._ RTHE. .- '�� I ; • j II • -'�: G,y i % I 11► Disp• O �� ~ • y_...._ \, °Ir 1 AMIC ...- ('6u/�.�''\. Agc,..;;;7:41n..rom,k)-4, .1. k n\ �� I Ng , Illip-_,,,....„161 m fur loc4Iii go I k , r.,,.,:.,.. \ ';� Ur riliii\\--- 1 •�1 • L•�• Longacre$ �I i \,,,,N.. .. ... . . .,... _.,.......,..,.., J "�•t°" ss • • r �-i l . Ur I—=-ai� M�Ur �ti�_ ` Wo :eD . •11' •6.BeC \ :•�•s.� ,,ra;r4727., ': •• - ,li, 4114 IL.1�■'Track 1^ `•\ I� ` .I•• • :ilp, I (AgD Y '••,s_• ,..,,: ,..,,., �•0 ,,_ 1: I 4421i .:...1 . i Ur :*.• . " 1 •:i glil;• 0 fflal Wo .._..:1.- '..;..i.15:..s..::`,..i. .iik:i jai., �l At: 25 4 • loir litc IBM II 29 I ;`..eics MaP 11 e • � . . . . i r � 166 i203 AgC /�,�� WoA ' ' „Z�II I • L:�4;:..�1V:is''. .5�• . - `•- -•Y._ 11 II.� . • ,I,..• �� %t ..�,, . •,ice #�-r ... .t'- •.. cli) / ��II' ' So w1 IOC• rS'.',:''•, — _ I _1 h �If; '� 'fir :� I �.Cla / '1.•• 'F/ �\ 11'f `•�c _�-� -- ' \�� 17�.i�. �j31LFiI 1 I.i--•1 �I i I I, 7.-ZA._I-..: ibi Iv it i 1 / pm 194 ; r• I A -• • . Itipt: 1 Airri:.11• -;-.. . "::',;.1 .1'7` •••• :1.1 N.. IN I . ''''' . : i'lli;"\. ,,, • 111. 11Vt a 1 IIr__\:,,, .v •• • - - n rrr , �.::. TASK 3: FIELD INSPECTION There are no existing drainage fa'cilities on-site except for the ditch along the east side of the property. Runoff from the site and upstream areas generally sheet flows east and drains into the ditch. Runoff then enters the conveyance facility within Hardie Avenue S.W. which consists of 12" CMP pipes and catch basins; Water then travels southeast, then turns southwest within conveyancepipes along the Burlington Northern Railroad. Runoff then travels south where it eventually drains into the S.W. 7th Street conveyance facility which is approximately 1900 feet downstream from the property. The attached City of Renton Surface water Drainage System map clearly shows ;the downstream facilities. There were no existing drainage problems identified during our site inspection, nor are there any drainage problems anticipated for this multi-family residential development. TASK 4: DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESCRIPTION AND PROBLEM SCREENING No drainage problems were identified during our feild inspection. The downstream drainage facilities appear to be in good condition and adequate size to handle additional flows. TASK 5: MITIGATION The proposed development will generate additional runoff due to the increase in impervious surface. To, mitigate the effects of development, a detention facility is being proposed for this site, and will be sized per the King County requirements. A bioswale will also be provided to upgrade the quality of water leaving the site. These measures will provide adequate protection to the downstream facilities. • -___________ _ .• 5318 NW 1/4 a, 16.E5r 7 G1; . . • : • ,• ' • ......--1 . .. VI :t....,...„EV.......enY5-6 1 I 4-16E5-9: • -, • 1• . 16F5-6 CITY OF RENTON ,---:,,... c?, '-ras-4 .. ,•' . - - f 16.E5-5' . • . : : :• • • • . . ; Is.rs-Io 7: . __...... ,.......,,,, , _........."..:.,..„..,............, /34t ; •ms-,-6 --,... --, . "IN. I a) 3 ..M.F.7-II y • • SURFACE WATER ------__,:-.-,----Ji...,$t .... 4., 16/5-12. : . • Cel ?r *P • 1 : ; . : : •• a ............. ••••••••.,.... ". • • • . i ":'••-...5 - . :fa:Es-12v i :-1655-4 %,16)-5-' DRAINAGE SYSTEM -..... .... : . . . --......._,..,:-:.--'-'3 Ei . . . - • . ; . • i ! t' 1 16.C5-T3 A ••• • • • -•••••....., •-••••.--.... -•-•- vE.s•.••I I .------...• .. . .-.= ( . • .•••.• . .. .. at..t5-14.0 :.' S..,.-2d....,--gi. '" 'C :. : • • . . . . . .- ...' . .' .. ` •••• • . 9„S••".. scs-Et".':-,... • n..pi: . : ................... p i at ii•ii.-y _u,, 16/5-'8.• ; ••• .. ..:.'-••••••-.: •••-•'-..I I •..: ; .• •2‘ ••••••••-. -'•• : ........•••••,;-,...-:.•-:•i•••.. : ' 4.118441848=4.18,4• 08moN041•84J i t ' __.. ...______..7..,,,,, LEGEND • - • • ..., . : f f CI .: i •j•: , . Er E, ,. . •••.......: ' • f - k *---... .0 a, -- :•---- . •. - a-i. ,..,,..,............ 16152 s/ ; ..... .k :• • -- , lisis-i " . .--- : . I : I t ----, -A;),:: CI' ' > . . .. ' •..i : I Lscs-*'"--:-,.. . i •.. . , „.., , „, i •. • ; f? ..t. . .. •.. .• - . ..: :: •. . . w .1 . .....,:..16.E632 5 . :-,n, ii . • • :' ':- : ? . • .' : .. •.... , . . . ... vi i i c: v) . ... : c :- : :•• : - • '-"-[ L.4 : . . 1615-15 , - . . .. • u. .._p est .1.3 ::::ZZ ,....z..,4.,,,........„4 STORM SEVVI3t LJNES : c-s• .:, : -• .:f :MI6-.16.E6-?..„; .6.c........ . . .. .;" i/i/5-16 •• , 1..: • ' • CT i .?,j ‘.ke,r,; .....--•'• •-• 1• •• --...Os' I1S46 ".-....••••• ../'.• ' ; : 14E6-0'. i :16.11f.:-9',. .... • ps-3o .--• .-- S ;. ,7--'.•••••ii:c&_, •ES-1 1 ....... .... DITCH LNES , .....,... . is.Ffris . -.3., •. •t '14E6-5 : 16.46-2. '.---'/ ,"ef, ....-76.,?-9 ••••.....; ...'•- a i..c,,, ,-----............. . .-- _1-, i : --,,,, : - ..1--,-, -4P-t=LY if ,„....------ - -- { • -.,.....!5,6- .--, ils,,624-,; .,--: : . :. 44 ,-.... ,.-it...ci ,,: ---.........,.... co .,-,,,, : .:: . i ,---,-:„„. - "16E6-1 • ' D CATCH BASINS rd •- : • .-..... : ,-----..:-.7....-c'..... ----ii, ;-----.. --:--r--,-,:;.,:. .,. -. • . ..: ."......., e .. • .- , -....----. : : - --'4:::-...4.:;.. 6,1:16,1 -a 16.E6-0......,.....mv -14E6-2 „..„.,........,.• 3,-,_, '-'-'.' •-••••"•••••• 16E6-21, .:-.16.E6-11 .--,,,,.., •-:, ...• .•• ''',-44...,,,. '.ozib 1686 MANHOLES .. ---.....,.,1.1r ets.sg-s: -.. •• : . ';i16.E6-12 •:.....• '''''',*4 '-'''''.k : 14E6-16,4. .-,, , • .....,"- . ; • .."'. .."- 4 , DIRECTION ARROWS • • , . •., , ...-....6.1.,./ ./.... . ata, ..6....-44.5c,_4:1,...... ... /16.86-12.-- _ ,•••'''"•- •429. f ' -`'..'-•-• i . : ;;C., I. i : •••••••;,...! : ....4). i.(4.D6-7 ,,,, ..... ,. "• - --- ..s.s. E 6-O.,'" CULVERT CROSSING ..,....,-;--4 ,...„/I ...... • • •. .. ., )31, 1 1 1 ---: -• ; :. .......•-• i••-- . 1 l : 18-C8. +? -.."-... ... ' ...•,.. •16.E6-25 - ';•:`••••5."'6-7:. i S .-• i M796-: 2..... -::.... ----": ; ; ,'"--.:--•--, i :„„ SI--'•. if y i - _ - - ..„,•• •••1 el S i 5: ..* •••••• :•' .., 10.16E7-1 Ifa 6-1X , -- .. . , : -- •16.F 7-6 16.F RENTON CITY LIMITS fpi; : : ''::-1 ; -f : : ; ;---z.... -....... 5 ; -...)..? ......„st • Ut 4:::',',. ..."-:---...; : ' ; : : : i i . • • 10.;C2.76... ,f-''''''';' C.2 .„.."'... -. V - \ • 46.D7-E, • 14"18 .... ". 16/7-‘,' ,X) Ca4) ,,..., „.4••• , ''---- -4 ' - • ---"r-cr----- ---- SV Sunse v ,. .. . c? - -- 1 .- 16.07-14% ‘..... .0 "7-2 .2. • I . '' • 4 • ".--- ...„....--... .. - .. ?:,,,,,•-_,.,..--1.-•- .. , .:. .; '.• ',. ... •. . :..•- *, .."::.. -'$ " • CD . -.1 . .. .. -z .1 ..1 : .1 f ! i .:••-• LS- - t \-0 ,....--•c ••, , - .. ...-- : 0 : --••••.-,---...• • . -k tslil 16.87-9 '--------------- 6.117-13 % - • i - ......- ; • -,...,......s- ,f.,7_20 ..-i i , •• 1617-9". ; --".- - ...s.. 1 : 16.B7-8 ,,,,...-L;',7:::-1 i ' k ,... .,.107-:)?, . ... .• i •4 : .1-. f 16.0-5:1 ; f......... , 4 . ,. se. ....-. 9 6.-E 7-4 .' : 16.E -9 . .,-..... •••: 16,7,.---$"-'S. . . 11- i 16•/17.=7 --- 1.7 c. i ? i i „ , • •--- .,. .. 16)-7-10..4.•.-, ' t. ,1• 16.B7-5 ' •*-16•87-3 •"•'.4... i - -- i i I a; i 16-1:17-13 __....; ''', - •• -• .. .. ...-- -, 167-13 • , -. 16E7-6 _,614 ? ,...,•`-14E17-1. •.:.16.E7-6 ....--•-•-----.------••••.. Ikr 7-"1.:' kleiy-P, • ): . • ••... . . ..• ZZE)4"-=- 1 16.1/7-1,,"' ,....-•-""-'k k, 'KE 7-7 .•iii..i_i---,. :. ..,.. - ••--.... "•., . f 16.88-9 •••'' ••--- k .-, t ' ...IC/7 '; 16.87-4 14E7-3. %., --:, •'.. i 16.137-I "• LIFT STAT 1114 1.:'-- . . -••-.. Ism- "-, -.. DISCLAIMER' 16.17 --...... . • •16.88 638-3 i '16.C7-1 , 16.B8-1 ' k \ .... . .. ...... ••-• ' 6.387.!. • •::, 16.E8-6 1.E8-2 ,.."_2 ......••--••-. • • THIS INVENTERf:INFIRMATION FOR THE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM _ _ _ lie . • IS SCHEMATIC EIN.LY. IT VAS COMPILED FROM NUMEROUS SOURCES. ..,.. 1608 6 '. '.te-24 16/810 1 IT IS THE BEST.INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME. AND SHOULD ••• . ...----.. • ....-- i : .. . •. !Elie-7 . - BE USED FOR GENERAL GUIDANCE ONLY. THE CITY or RENTON • • . n ...454C4 • •••.... ',....,. ....,'"' .....----•..1.6.f.13.61.r.-.-76-...-7:.[;•:;” . ..•• ::: ,.. .....-• ,. . •.. . .. Is.re-is • i ' • IS MIT RESPONSIBLE FOR ERRORS OR OMISSIONS. WHEN THIS • .. • Fpton.. . ..•• ""' .. . . s z f E- • INFORMATICN IS USED FOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES. DESIGNERS -- • ARE TO FIELD VERIFY THIS INFORMATION. --• • ••• - • --.• 496E8-2 . S ::• • . . '... •• . ' - , (.. • S ; ". . . .. .. 16.08 -.....11 .".... 16JB-11 • .1688- ' r • • . . . -'. , . . ..... 46E8-1 • • .. ...•••- ,. i I • 1 .•-•' .,......... ............. 1 1 • ...--. • • 16.Fe-ai ___ - .--' • ........./ • :, :i "--•• I 1 • • •• . .. . 8-7 16E4 E.ce-8 ' 16E8-9 „• ...., ....* • . i , . . • •• ' .. f • • ... .: • . , , . . • •• 16.118-4 -I.., 18X8-18 j-16.E 8-p/ a• . • ,.1 • • ', 16.98-5 16....E8:7 •jt5!:•(l'..•24.D1-5 SW"- 1 St -it."•?'':-•2*--------1618 16.E 8 :'1'---•---`'''"•'''''.- ::•,...H..0-1? Axe-13AB iss - 0 40 0 800 ,i4S. .,.,„ ....,-S.3 ................ 3Stk12. 1,„,- : - • • • - • N tra- E8-21 16/8- 1 .16.(8-20 'NEREsig. :•:•:::,....;•:•:•••:-..:•;•::.:....:::::.:•:.:::.;.:.::: • r.,,„...,_ ; 14E18-3 •..-.....:'.........................,.,....„ii,..1.64.../ 56,,,,,•.cal.:: ..16,,E _6 ... „2•_-.,(......m...., ,...... r: '7.7•7 •711ii.i.MMEM , - 1.- 1 -4800 ›• - ,- . D! 0:, • /--....,-2_. / - • , ,e .$ )1:1 . .-• o). > a .21E2-4 4 ,,gLEt-e 0 A• NO6 l' . - ... .> • ace-t 4 . + MR • P/B/PW ,I'ECHNICAL SERVICES ni 4 , •--- . c cs •49.- .rai2-3-.: • 1.2 „e. 09/23/96 'i • < c . , - u : ..'3'. 21E3-4 .--11 SI ... / •: 1:, .: •, / •ceNrco , • w I i ...• . .. 2LL3-4 .,21E3-11 , , , ' t (...1 i' • •-•••••-.21E3-3 • • 5318 SW 1/4 . , • , a 20.H3- 5319 NW 1/4 _._•, . . .... • . . , .•