Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA76-882
; tn vn = , --''^174,9 �Sb. `^76977=^.«�.. ......R R......YIP .�.TXse.riWa6IY�iIIBG Yeser . . : , 1 - r i ......4.... ~Y � - ,. n-- . . .l t I� — i a s...,) s � ? �. \\ � _ .,' ...- W J— I - — i. L ® w — Epp" ' T - i1JPr ' •r N.E.\\n• I MO ra,0 repF • i112 --� \ l t11121 • lid 1 1y , is• 1 YN.E. se. • Wt - ) a .F M fT. — (311 ---: "1 C• .;°'' E a - , . , , .„ . W . ,..., n � `/L Z� � I Y+ D sf :, » airr . n z E _ � - C a , rr , _ t�� ri© ©©0WWag ' .1 n1 --_--_ u . ...,i-d -- If �° , �• -*NO 1151�n• f_ .Y..- _-- 0 0 - — 4•—`Y--+�1 '1+.�:r .I'—lr'_ .T.:..,',"''"., .:. d,a \ r-- - - I I _[ • =i.+.J : 1 lit• :ELM"' N. • fr �ki1.III ; ionaeS. v 1 _L__ _._1 _ _ _.- r . _ , :, emu. r:;_,' 3: A m ggiv 40 , I' i a '-_;' - W ®0a.t0 as i ««�.�.,..�.=.—. • m _j; �� ,gym —fi G S -1. ..,. __-4-., res.a2orift,i: . Ejisal rx fill 1 4' ' w� 0 �, I Is\e 9 s w 80.ainwr. au 7 I{ fI . i N. .7TN - . v©�TI�� it: a eemem N-G-• 00 t�� ,,,' 4 'i Ct! +zlra — + . =_1`. ..I 1 i W N.E.TM ET- R +, i zo lie - t ; I I' • I s_♦ S-I. ,1.I9''o `11111, rt 'Z.j I. ii.,i.,. ' ' • R I 1 _ _ I _ .3 d---_ VAC ' I' ' l --+ di • 'tun i'w i nt7ega HAROLD P . PETERSON : M1]'1o! tai p,°, ' j- I REZONE -; � , gym:: WAIVER �� ci,D00 �` I _—_ I SR-I 1 il -- --41- i -GG-S 1 -. R -3 /9 I 4. Y r-F— I I 1 1 1 1 O. _ 171-17j . I • I- A T - ► i sra ,, � Y ZO E-I i _II� s: 1 REZONE: Harold P. Peterson; Appl . No. R-882-76; Rezone from GS-1 to SR-1; property located at 762 Monroe Avenue N.E. WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS: Harold P. Peterson; Appl . No. W-883-76; Application for waiver of off-site improvements for a two lot short plat; property located at 762 Monroe Avenue N.E. , APPL I CANT Harold P. Peterson TOTAL AREA ±20,000 sq.ft. PRINCIPAL ACCESS Monroe Avenue. N.E. EXISTING ZONING GS-1 } EXISTING USE Single Family Residence , y PROPOSED USE A Two. Lot Short Subdivision • COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Single Family Residential District COMMENTS ,. :ip riLIc• o rJOTICE Ns 44741.,."010.. 'i ,..: ,tca! - gs.-Ar..,v _..t] - ,:•.m,+••A 411L43ir m; ,.7.,-,tor4,- .3;z. qc=..:.Alt,o..*t.b;eT`1.k PUBLIC HEARING '-'1 :19):4--/;/,:"-i":. CITY OF RENTON -� PLANNING COMMISSION A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON SEPTEMBER _ 8, 1976 8 OO P.M. iTO CONSIDER THE ITEM DESCRIBED BELOW: 'VStLW'. wr15F 1'J,r'.Y, r.f•h.. <.faN^. ie-'i4 ',v'.i.-..,. ',•..I; ':u ..n w.Mt, n - .• .. *., a . F'..... REZONE AND WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS : HAROLD P . PETERSON : Appli . R-882-76 ; REZONE from GS-1 to SR-1 ; Appli . No . W883-76 ; Application for Waiver of. Off-site improvements for a two lot short plat ; property located at', 762 Monroe Avenue N1E . I 1 le- is - '- sr - ,--'_i, — -- - - --- 1 - )L_.- - - 1-_ - '�,�,� I ' . r ,.1:____}_4, ," • n •1 N a' �Q N.E Y1 .1a f 1 IlniJr. S --. _ .. •' 6 .I I :° •1'_•..��L •I��J. :i o NET.��d�����f`/L1� �`•`.[ ��,r*` a _r _._ rr •f '®a -$u • 1. 1•d® '• A i d�r.� q' 'zTD;,\:. •.,� 1. 5 a©�W i�•a d:[ „ r-1 •11:.1[II _ j I [• � HAROLD P . PETERSON : Z `l` 1 - L-" T. + ,I. ' I f 'sr REZONE +lea - • , I •,� -, -::� WAIVER •�Z >• 5 T. 4 �r-+ I. w�� A -t i . • s r _- - - . o o _ •1 ��.��a ., r ,/ a _• yy •s 't' ,°(• • •'�J '''IR-i T`i eE. --- ' a i_r-_,a, ... x ale I I 1 .i 1d - •. ..ice_, ',.,.,..1:.1.,,d A G 7 0® • r j' 1 2•: •,. 4 S _.._.J •::I.:.I ' . k _SDw - W�..N^n 7M6T. J •T i� I Fla-,z1. o AliiiiiiriiiiiiIS� 44emAo!:?•, odd �Oap©m` _,1 J1 4111 { N( ni Pl M.f.W fl f�( 11 Fru IB_. ,+A 43I.l ' r ! I ! 0, • MO • c 0 ; '• ' , N to _i i f:.' 1.i _ a i,.,i. 1•' •_ �� 13111101 D ., Y`Y II• t t-ST'Y4 t23fF'"?T'SR"'lu4"7.63f l I� i I �1 r , , 1 t r a 1.1 l 1 �N�++'p!"r•!"�•�'� � ...,,... ,n-.:».n -.•. ....,gin..., =-w..n:vs.t x n +�. I, �':^a ".e-..ses'ta,ata;rar.;�<.a^s,:ua:'izixa;.tt�^...:. ...+•r :k. .m•,.e•, .,.:... .-.: ,�• ..r_.. _ :+� THE PUBLIC IS INVITED TO ATTEND AND TO EXPRESS! OPINIONS OR S BMIT COMMENTS IN WRITING. IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS DESIRED, CONTACT :! CITY OF RENTON - PLANNING DE�'ARTMENT, 235-2550 MUNICIPAL BUILDING, 200 MILL AVE. S. RENTON, WA, 98055 , 4 fiP Z-14.; pF A .► .t R •, THE CITY OF RENTON r40 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 2 ,�. 0 p m s °% CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • • PLANNING DEPARTMENT • pA • 235-2550 O • 4TFOSEP-it0O September 10 , 1976 Harold Peterson 562 Bronson Way N. E . • Renton , . WA 98055 • RE : --APPLICATION FOR R-EZON-E - #R-882-76 Dear Mr. Peterson : - The Planning Commission at its September 9 , 1976 public hearing denied your application for rezone of the property located at 762 Monroe Avenue N . E . The Commission , after consideration of the facts of the proposal , determined that the request was not • compatible with surrounding land uses , and that further subdivi - sion of the property would be detrimental to adjacent properties and the unique character of ' the area . • :You have. the option of requesting to the City Council an appeal of this ruling within ten ( 10) days from the date of the ruling . Such an appeal _must be submitted in writing -to the Planning Depart- ment. If you have further questions , please contact this Department . Very truly yours , • Gordon Y.. Ericksen • P1 ni g D ', eor • • Michael L . Smith Associate Planner • MLS : vb — — PROPOSED/FINAL utCLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/ ANON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No . R-882-76 0 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-164-76 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Rezone from GS-1 to SR-1 Proponent Harold P . Peterson Location of Proposal 762 Monroe Ave. N . E . Lead Agency City of Renton Planning Department This proposal has been determined to 0 have ® not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is [pis not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) (c ) . This decision was ma e after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : 1 . Proposal to rezone to standard single family residence zone is in conformance with- existing development and planning for the area and will not create any significant impacts . Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a ( proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official Gordon Y . Ericksen Title Plannin Dir ctor Date September 6 , 1976 Signature _..___.__....___.-.._._____.._-- -_.-.-` City of__Renton--- . - - - - - Planning Department - 5-76 e--1:64„,/ Renton City Council _ 9/20/76 Page 2 CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS CONSENT AGENDA MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY THORPE, COUNCIL APPROVE ALL ITEMS ON THE APPROVAL CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. Bicentennial Letter from Soroptimist International of Renton, Corresponding Air Park. Secretary Olive A. Stritmater, supported full credit to the Kiwanis Club of Renton for their years of work and funds raised toward the new park at, Renton Airport, noting the name Kiwanis Bicentennial • Air Park would be most appropriate. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY SEYMOUR-THORPE, COUNCIL REFER LETTER TO THE AVIATION COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Horizons '76 Letter from Lew Innocenti , Chairperson of the Renton Bicentennial- Committee Diamond Jubilee Committee noted the last regular meeting of that committee and recommended formulation of a Renton Horizons '76 Committee, to which over 15 community volunteers have pledged sup- port. Mr. Innocenti announced the following charter: Coordinate and implement objectives from Renton's Town Meeting 5/8/76 at Renton. High School ; 4th of July Picnic at Liberty Park annually; Community interest in community events for community and national pride. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY SEYMOUR-THORPE, COUNCIL REFER THIS MAT- TER TO THE MAYOR'S OFFICE FOR RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Harold P. Peterson Letter from Harold and Deane Peterson, 562 Bronson Way N.E. , .regis- Rezone Appeal tered appeal of the Planning Commission denial of application for GS-1 to SR-1 ' rezone of property located at 762 'Monroe Ave. between N.E. Sixth and N.E. Seventh. The letter explained plan to divide the lot into two sections, providing pipestem egress and improve the existing house and garage on the front lot. The letter further explained procedure followed and objections to the denial . Upon advice from City Attorney Shellan, it was MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL SET PUBLIC HEARING FOR DATE OF OCTOBER 18, FOR APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF THE PETERSON REZONE. CARRIED. Peterson Rezone Letter from Michael L. Smith, 3402 N.E. 7th St. , requested Council Denial Request . deny Harold P. Peterson appeal of the Planning Commission decision of 9/8/76,at which time Peterson request for rezone was denied. Mr. Smith's letter noted request made on behalf of his neighbors. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY SEYMOUR-THORPE, COUNCIL REFER LETTER TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. Economic Letter from Mayor Delaurenti presented proposed Resolution authoriz- Development ing the Mayor and City Clerk to make application for certain Economic , Administration Development Administration funds on behalf of the city for four projects listed from the Local Public Works Capital Development and Investment Program of PL 94-369. The letter recommended application be made for 100% financing of each of the four projects in a total amount of .$3,670,000. The letter noted the SW 43rd project being joint with Kent and EDA application would be made by Renton and shared equally with Kent.. The letter explained the allocation of grant funds will be made by computer on a "point basis" without regard for local priority and against all other applications submitted, noting the city's best interests would be served by submitting several applica- tions in order that one or more may be funded. City Clerk Mead Resolution #2065 read the Resolution authorizing grant applications for the new main Authorizes EDA fire station, SW 43rd. St. improvements, Talbot Hill pump station Funding Application and water tie line to Rolling Hills, and the Cedar River Trail System. Fire Station, etc. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL APPROVE RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAYOR AND RESOLUTION AS READ AUTHORIZING MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO MAKE APPLICATION FOR EDA FUNDS. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Nancy Berry, President of the Renton Chapter of National Organization . for Women, inquired of the organization's letter which had been pres- ' Bicentennial ented to the Saturday 9/11/76 Council meeting. Miss Berry called Airpark attention to the proposed name, of "Amelia Earhart Park," and was advised by Mayor Delaurenti the letter was referred to the 'Aviation Committee and would be discussed at their meeting 9/21/76. City Vehicles Ralph Hart, 125 Wells Ave. N. , objected to city personnel driving city cars back and forth to work. Mayor- Delaurenti advised the matter has been reviewed in the past and a few employees are allowed to take cars home because of emergency calls, and that the matter would be further reviewed. RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting September 20, 1976 Municipal Building . Monday, 8: 00 P. M. Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor C. J. Delaurenti led the Pledge of Allegiance and called the regular meeting of the Renton City Council to order. CITY COUNCIL RICHARD M. STREDICKE, Council. President; ROBERT E. McBETH, KENNETH ROLL CALL D. BRUCE, GEORGE J. PERRY AND PATRICIA M. SEYMOUR-THORPE. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY SEYMOUR-THORPE, ABSENT COUNCILMEN WILLIAM J. GRANT AND EARL CLYMER BE EXCUSED. CARRIED. CITY OFFICIALS CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , Mayor; DON CUSTER, Administrative Assistant; IN ATTENDANCE GWEN MARSHALL, Finance Director; DEL MEAD, City Clerk; RICHARD GEISSLER, Asst. Fire Chief; WARREN GONNASON, Public Works Director;. GERARD M. SHELLAN, City Attorney; GORDON Y. ERICKSEN, Planning Director; CAPT. BOURASA, Police Department Representative; VERN CHURCH, Purchasing Agent; Tom Touma, Design Engineer. PRESS. IN ATTENDANCE DON SMITH, Renton Record Chronicle MINUTE APPROVAL Council President Stredicke noted correction to name of Seattle R. I. Reporter, John Wilkins. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY McBETH, COUNCIL APPROVE MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 11 , 1976 AND SEPTEMBER 13, 1976 AS WRITTEN. CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted, L. I.D. #288 published and mailed, Mayor Delaurenti opened the public hearing Whitman Crt.N.E. to consider the final assessment roll in amount of $158,340.69 Street and 'for Local Improvement District No. 288, construction and installa- Lighting tion of street and street lighting improvements and incidentals in the vicinity of Whitman Court N.E. City Clerk Mead read letters of protest from I. D. Investments and J. W. Dalpay. Letter from John E. Phillips of Hillis, Phillips, Cairncross Clark & Martin, representing Dura Development, Inc. , responsible for payment of LID 288 assessments of Mueller and Dunham, and S. Delong, object ed to the assessment on basis of 5/16/74 agreement with the City setting total sum of $110,000 for the improvements with assessment on those 'two parcels of $74,877 rather than the $92,125 set forth in the final assessment roll notice. Mr. Phillips' letter asked amendment of the roll . Public Works Director Gonnason confirmed the agreement referred to by Mr. Phillips and noted alternatives, also explaining increased cost of project due to increased acquisi- tion and condemnation costs, asking Council instruction to prepare revised assessment roll with $58,463 city participation and that hearing be continued 30 days and referred to committee. MOVED BY ued McBETH, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL INSTRUCT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPART- Hearing Conto October tin tin 1976 MENT TO PREPARE REVISED ASSESSMENT ROLL, CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING FOR 30 DAYS AND REFER THE MATTER TO THE PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION. Mayor Delaurenti set the date of October 25, 1976 for public hearing. MOTION CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA The following Consent Agenda items, previously distributed to all Council" members, are considered routine and are enacted by one motion unless removed for separate consideration by Council action. Appointment Letter from Mayor Delaurenti announced appointment of Terry Lee Terry L. Treadwell Treadwell to the permanent position of Police Officerwith the Renton Police Department effective 10/1/76, having successfully completed his six months probationary period. Council concurrence recommended. Auditor's Report The forty-ninth Examination of the City from January 1 , 1975 to of Examination December 31 , 1975 by the Office of the State Auditor was filed with the City Clerk and is available for inspection. (Information) Damages Claim Claim for Damages was filed by Clyde W. Downing, 31424 West Lake. C.W. Downing Morton Dr. , Kent, for damage to water heater allegedly due to unsched- uled water meter removal . Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Carrier. Fire Pumper Truck Letter from Michael L. Smith, Chairman of the Fire Station Advisory Committee, noted item inadvertently omitted from special report by the committee, approved by Council 9/11/76, and requested referral of the following item to the Public Safety Committee for considera- tion: One new pumper be purchased as soon as possible, preferably before 1978. - p� R RECEIVE FC'o D CITY OF RENTON AUG 18 1976 REZONE APPLICATION F �lN� PS.•or Office Use Only: DES APPL. NO. *4 g 2-74 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION $50 FEE; RECEIPT NO. C�"3/ APPEAL FILED FILING DATE a 7G CITY COUNCIL ACTION HEARING DATE ORDINANCE NO. & DATE APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 10 : De �- Ci &.Name � . in�. 1 (0_ i;� .�' phone ). 2. Address �� '�r Sc 4767�I ( E 3. Property petitioned for rezoning is located between / )( and Y 4. Square footage or acreage of property l6() f 5. Legal description of property (if more space is required/ attach separate sheet) /1/ - ;T/o `7 f'z I Ai, .i E> 41), tit. L--4r24 ----s' ,2/"a/461 44.s• �C�e -7 e c‘r- ,,�a -7 '(2/, rigx.o • 6. Existing zoning ( c ! Zoning Requested s R-' NOTE TO APPLICANT: The following factors are considered in reclass- ifying property. Evidence or additional information to substantiate your request may be attached to this sheet. (See Application Procedure sheet for specific requirements) . Submit this form in duplicate. 7. Proposed use of site. TO s' c / i « ,, (0 Jo � j � / �, ci . e x i c J ki 3 S/ _ cry.- 1-0-) J C p 8 . List the measures to be taken to reduce impact on the surrounding area. c_ N O , — , //} rig: 9. How soon after the rezone is granted do you intend to develop the site? I ve .$) . ►- -4 e d C IeaI , ) Q -- 10.. Two copies of plot plan and affidavit of ownership are required. Planning Dept. • AFFIDAVIT • i, CZ-G cG / Dpp, 11 64- ahyv' , being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the ®ro eSct ' involved in this application and that the P P Y PP foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me • this \\ day of AV *0)SA- , 1916 , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at c Vkj • \ -/-b-U) (Name of Notary Public) (Signature of Owner) (Address) (Address) (City) (State) • (Telephone) • (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify tha-tthe foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found,found)0jOr-fbecough and complete in every particular and to 4.conform to the res aand rsegru ations of the Renton Planning Department governing the f-'wlangng IIisgt h lication . Li • AUG 1 8 186 Date Received 19 By : Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON •,',' ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM `, �'! ,1 I n 1"4;�' i .--: ..,. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY /� `I/ ''''.' 0- -s8Z-7.4 '1��� ��5` Application No. taa�Ne ,v Environmental Checklist No. AIIP` /444-76 • PROPOSED, date: FINAL, date: ® Declaration of Significance U Declaration of Significance ® Declaration of Non-Significance Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS : ' 1 Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be . prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a . ' proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available' to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to! undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future-. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the fu.,ture. NOTE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACKGROUND / J _ ) 1. Name of Proponent 7; (/ )/'4 l t ,r� (_'r; „ (am" t` 1 ; St-iri- 2 . Address and phone number of Proponent: 4/�) L / J 3. Date Checklist submitted 9 -- / . 4. Agency requiring Checklist fly -;1 'j� j� /i 6I/1/7/ ir1 i1i1 S.1I6oi I 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: Q CAb)1 �0-29i '1L� 7) 1 �.C} 1 <.J/ 1 < /,S7 )---71 J jll71 d' n7 ;• s DiOpe 6. Nature anV brief description of the proposal (including but not linfit/ed toS size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : ' , 51/1,22;//f di/.../ e__ — )c2.. L/ / 19' %b it.6 S e.r.ri - bO'1 o T e /a/ S,/ 7FP -- J .rZ ,jri P1 re/z:/i `I- fi-esS , . ?/ sty • -2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental settin of the proposal ) : 74) b)--/).-.0' .. - h 6,7/iv,,,, ,--,..,., '/ 1, 0I ) _ 93J, I --- Jo / x :7---�67/ (..�, 6.o6 V7 .213/) 8. Estimated date for completion of/ the proposal : �S S)o a5 h o c.S', b /e, , hiAgy, 4 p11 iOLc d by pli2 /0s 9. List of all permits, licenses or government approvals required for the proposal (federal , state and local --including rezones) : ,SIOOif 7 / -1 e/J92 /�_ �e- Z e. >, , CY 5 1 — /G! h /'7/ '-2 y l ,n29.1 /-.) /£.F'l o'er..• �i . 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal ? If yes , explain : �r�- r _ f7o i2e c esJcri y Sc; y N '1 (.�.S l2 1 e J /2)!Dr®k c. e X ,s/7 7.-)' G �l 0 0 C ry', a 12 c1� 1_0 11. Do you know of any/ plans by others which may affect the property covered by you proposal ? If yes , explain: a • 12. Attach any other ,application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: . 4 a - 1/Q-7) - J` - r 1/ '_p// k e9�Pi,- y�P�1 z`1 II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) (1) Earth. Will the proposal result in : (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic / substructures? L. YE MAYBE NO (b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over- Ci covering of the soil ? YES MAYBE NO (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief / features? L Yam— F9 ABBE NO- (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any f unique geologic or physical features? YET— MAYBE NO (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , U' either on or off the site? q Yr5 MAYBE NO (f) Change's in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation , deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the t//• ' bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? YET— MAYBE NU— Explanation: is I c ✓ / ( Q ��J /•d_x,d,/ f / U f ` 'i G. kcc?SJJ P-,, / a I- (---_a , _ 10 Ja e' _c.a j d •�zry '- I .,�1/Gt I i �6 vy'ov P..,r) toga- _ v. �_p k r_)_E:.-y�_ . 0f F_ XIS 1V'9 SiruClztkeS . ' -3- . (2) Air. Will the proposal result in : (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? f./ I YES MAYBE NO (b) The creation of objectionable odors? V YES MAYBE Nif— (c) Alteration of air movement , moisture or temperature, i or any change in climate , either locally or regionally? v YES MAYBE NO Explanation : NO / f r? {,l .S /' / G • 11 s Ce. c (% y.? S 1 d y ci - W 1.I 4 1 n.y c� eJ� 1 1' o circa_ , /'tot, (3) Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of v water movements , in either marine or freOh waters? 1 YES MAYBE NO (b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? e✓ YES MAYBE NO (c) Alterations to the coarse or flow of flood waters? YES MAYBE NO (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? ` YES MAYBE NO (e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? YES MAYBE N- (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? YES MAYBE NO (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , 'either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through v • interception of an 4quii`er by cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection , or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria , v or other substances into the ground waters? YES MAYBE NO (i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available i for public water supplies? ' ` YES MAYBE NO • Explanation : Ne , _f_:::f, k:_-4-���` '" (--- �,�_.11.1.7_",__1�!_-- ; l r _ ( �► . C•��� GAL<=;y Z_-�_k'E r- - t fJ_Ll-�i --!! - (4) Flora. Will he proposal result in: CI) jt"11e,-. I (a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of flora ( including trees , shrubs , grass , crops , microflora and aquatic plants)? YES MAYBE TO (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique , rare or endangered species of flora? •' s YES—r MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? YES RATITE- NO-- (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? i,/ ES FATgf NO . Explanation: A rea, 1 S ral- 0 t y ,v 1 C'-U I 1 uk• 0 / 0y _ i — • • -4- (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of ' any species of fauna •,(birds , land animals including reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , V / insects or microfauna)? • TES-- MAYBE NU- (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or Z/ endangered species of fauna? • YES MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area , j or result in a barrier to the migration or movement jf of fauna? Yam- MAYBE NO, (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? !/. ' l _f YES MAYBE NO planation: _20 .... Z _1_c)� et?, d lJ 8 s ne, i _ha 1,, , ______a_tiy, _.0 f) -ilie S r, eiKyLlie:_i_zza_i_ii_,_ (6) Noi_se. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? • 1//' YES MAYBE NO . Explanation: - AJ(/ j - iha u c '1i1 Q / bv` -- D !-r_,-ba_e„=!-�_L_--__p tf k jria-S r• - (7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or gy e? d . ,�, /� y �'DES MAYBE NONO E xl l a n a t i on: Op_zn _7i1' '�— .E �#—�---'--�s�-' li"�'/ / �� Li -k a- r--o-k -- r 1{ - 1 ci_d c-d--,_ -- - la. e -� c - .. --- 1/1/e d _ar- ``` -- (8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration .of,, the present or planned land use of an area? `7E—s MAYBE NO Explanation: ii 64 S - 'D�� 1< d F= .c" i--- (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in : • (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? 4.--' YES MAYBE NO (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? <' YES M� NO Explanation: b y_ 1) 61 ,S ,___d____,L__* 3 a rCi e-71 a r a._Ji.cL p)-e_s. e/a/11____LeLtiniihy-s , ( 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a' risk of an • explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? v TES MAYBE NO Explanation: ki±jAal J ?ede -jiJ (11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? `-/ ' YES MAYBE NO- • l Explanation: 7'0 (.l:•/J 6 e...e (/ $ d 4r fit, yti- em.,, ' sip ,tvhg„, vt _ ,: d s ) 4e- cam_. -- -5- ( 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: COC -'t7) a// )7ot/se, , 9a4,, L., de ape (7 %' i t1 /6 )}-4��oi,��, 6� X IS474 1d,/',9 s �'E' d r� (13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in : (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? . YES MAYBE NO (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand ' ' for new parking? y YES RYE NO (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? d i YES- MAYBE NO (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? YES MAYBE NO (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f� YES MAYBE NO (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , L� bicyclists or pedestrians? YES MAYBE NO Explanation:. e y C� E' / �e,? 1 (2 1 rF'ee `C,, i) • • )2) t oI/ ,/ (14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : (a) Fire protection? L1 YES RATITE NO ' (b) Police protection? �J�,SS YES MAYBE NO /� (c) Schools? v YES WATT WU- (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? G/ YES MAYBE NO (e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? ZZ YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? L/ 'TES WV NO Explanation: /)) nt(J'v )17 7C' C.1 1,' ! P2Uki,l 1r -x e-y,cC-/ 0h I' aJ;11 ) � s ( 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in : (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? Tea— MAYBE WO-- (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? /" �f T MAYBE NO Explanation: W1 // eJeaj''' JA &0 /j/ri�7C/e -f C>rd �'et/ C' D�t e, — ra 6-7r0,/ (16) Utilities . Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities : • (a) Power or natural gas? V YES- WIRE NO (b) Communications systems? • • YES MAYBE NO • (c) Water? pipes s r+� YES MAYBE NO• . • • -6- (d) Sewer or septic tanks? YES MAYBE Ike `/. (e) Storm water drainage,? YES MAYBE NO • (f) Solid waste and disposal? iv,/ ` ^ YES MAYBEl� NO Explanation: /Y ,/ �/)7•�/ / sc/d , Cam/ no( de li e?./G e_01 - ��.,, p c a.S' 'a • . • ( 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of • any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding • mental health)? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: ,'j)?.7)/1.-0f/e, (/ /^ F-a, - cl c/d , /7 F'-l1. GjJfl C)cY _ _&___S _ '7 N I r C'.5 0 fq Y E U , , u /7)ptPVic (18) Aesthetics . Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public , or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? YES MAYBE NO xp Elanation: � -Q6' e JCL )' 1L cL6' Q` IC' -1 -..__zia./u v /O ( La . (19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? . • 1 YES MAYBE NO • Explanation: / Illy' h iOkI cee {�(°,C-lam (n-7c1 1 op p G�} � t h tr x_ s �Y G. jpoyAe.,,r, ) 0 v��-� ' `�l�1 0 -P x � S (20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an a—Iteration of a signiilant archeological or historical site, structure , object or building? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: )1/12:1 �L1 � 0jr) a 1-2 a /-EC11 III . SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: 41.-JZ i 42-ca.) 0E)aaye,2,..) (signed) c Q rG 1)*Cer.- name printe 1 • City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 V o /2, Acr..-. ", „.:-..,4.14„,v,:r4n:'ZIV r l`"' v es'' z tr o ' f Y wY . t < b ;. ..' •� n'e µ k rx9- f y4, SI C ' .K ? pJc 'MS"'J' M c ! , err - i `s Y xT ' -5 "' + t y"{St� r '?? l ,' r ' �,+� { r r .f !+' x ,i1`"i$pJ ':sky + + . '� p rt'tr ' !•x +r� dFC ti r Fii,r+Y I'„..4 k f ..•- �,wy ,-.4f,4 + ' . Tyci„,...-Itri,,.. 0,...,,, x r" u� 7 '� :, �ru � } Y. " a s rt { �'4. +„`^,'. t{, k�,''F'," x+, 4r''1,1 ny„j -'x��k , s` ,k�` ��t �{ 4 4p "�'4ye5 • 'At ti''`p. ' ,�i ti�r"l yi 'i N r? 1 H 5` { K l�{L 3 tea lii fc •+P yr<v �••, ,', Wooded A I e.a, « yri.^se 4 , tri q y' .tj� 3 +�.J i y�. /, S r 1'�w YLrk�` *f t' •y�5}_1 {a''.Si �",••� •C+1 '4 f t+ `M. Ili AS .�. r 'r aPrrStN,{""` �+ Z {yrt' f, • �,' Y ,� kart ', �9Y° .4`"P.� s.. �`S"k"M �,i q�y„' '.v k s' a i f fl , , , tie 1 Y.,�rtr y �„�• �' ,\ ',�� C+,r Py�'{YF}'s{"Y K 1 v K Cis Y ,,,,:,,.-'a,, ,;..-.. .,,-..,,-4,:t:i.,,,:,,. ,,,,,,o,,...-(.4,.....:e.i.".41e-...'-'''''''' ,% h, a lily I r F /6/(/� • 71-ad I ��.1�V� ( a �€� • 5�+5t \ / '� 4 r y1IY1{ y. �,x, ,r ,.w th3sr4, { _. + 'r z �f�{ E it '�„xk<`+ 's ,. ?�x'r`? '�^+ V _ w a a: a F r a+ii; Y ,f06 t'fre.'' a',11,. .0),..,tit.hlt,1% 9=�r�-�'' } " d' *.5 4 t 1 "l+k fi p 'fir `' -:SC w t' s��t,i{ :' ry^'ei.y"'r �,rs(e1hl-4- MK a 't.i.tyt"'4; "'' �. +yy6 t 3w Y g '' Lk C fy fa ' ,Y ` iit:VA 1. I , .3,4„ , „ii,..,‘,y, 1 }r t�,.3' SLJ r ,v. '� Asir ``'-.yi'.e,re _�`[t�'y`'„ ¢ , 1, r�3i5j 4+ �l fb.!• '. : 1h l'+' s�t'4 �,M1 -r e 1 ''''i. *i . 1` �l ,µ� a, ; F G ..l k a G�i Sti. ,F7 S`a��.i...Y �y}r I �',egj yai3 G#{F � w•'T y`"iy-'r 7'',VA''"5]fi V A.f. },. z '�tx"'�S,C r' � t •1.?b yr 4 z a s ')41 + K ,cif 1 g`+\ �♦ "r}", { �.. i t S*�r } N'x'{ t )' er 51 4aCg2} w , !rr �r• ..t,{ 1'.• r ,s, •. s r4'$f ems` '�5E+'�. 1 v-".,ovv'K K�ro 'i ,�x ' Y (. ' \ Win�'$ 7 } q 9 ' c ` p '''"' 1, ti • ti... ` J sy+.yy„,,� + w Cr •' Y'4' � sS-�icy r` n�t ",w ',4'n .. . } Fir `� E��f�V. i' " �' Y . • • • • .,, , • • • i • . • -1 00i 09 09 0r oZ 0 ,O7 =.,/ :210,9 - i + ; :r .... • I • 6-ao,. - I • ...oo-aaz • Q o ,„ /0 067g 0/ 1- \ •••: o p . p r Op AQc, 00/ OD/ I • oo voz .8do 89 s I • I NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON PLANNING ,COMMISSION RENTON , WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION AT ITS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON SEPTEMBER 8 , , 19 7,6 , AT 8 : 00 P. M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1. PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR A MOBILE HOME PARK IN T ZONE ; file No . MH-871-76 ; property located ± 1000 feet south of N . E . 4th Street and ± 400 feet west of Union Avenue N . E . 2 . SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE IN L-1 ZONE ; file No . SP-874-76 ; property located adjacent to and north and south of South Grady Way and between Springbrook Creek and Oaksdale Avenue S .W . 3. SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE IN M-P/G ZONE ; file No . SP-822-75 ; property; located south of existing Mobil and Olympic Petroleum Distribution Facilities , north of S .W . 43rd Street , and westerly of Eat Valley Road . 4. SPECIAL PERMIT TO OPERATE A HALFWAY HOUSE FOR UP TO EIGHT TEENAGED BOYS IN SR-1 ZONE ; file No SP-879-76 ; property located at 1919 Talbot Road South . 5 . REZONE FROM GS-1 TO SR-1 ; file No . R-882-76 ; property located at 762 Monroe Avenue N . E . 6 . WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR A TWO LOT SHORT PLAT ; file No . W-883-76 ; property located at 762 Monroe Avenue N . E . 7 . ' WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR A TWO LOT SHORT PLAT ; file No . W-878-76 ; property located between 309 and 217 N . W. 7th S 8. WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS , FOR A THREE LOT SHORT PLAT ; file No . W-881-76 ; Property located on the southwest corner of N . E . 12th Street and Aberdeen Avenue N . E . ; the east 230 feet of Tract 26 . Legal descriptions of all applications noted above . on file in the Renton Planning Department . ALL INT ' RESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ON SEPTEMBER 8 , 1976 AT 8 :00 P. M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . GistSECRETARY PUBLISHED AUGUST 29 , 1976 RENTONndra PLANNING �COMMISSION CERTIFICATION I , Michael L . Smith , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT1THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME fN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn to before me , a Notary Public , SIGNED on the 26th day of August , 1976 , 1 �j ��,��Gt°— �- 4 OF R ' o THE CITY OF RENTON C. $� Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055. o� . CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 4-37 235-2550 o * /P4lf0 SE MEMORANDUM September 16, 1976 TO : Gordon Y . Ericksen , Planning Director FROM: Michael L. Smith , Associate Planner RE : HAROLD PETERSON REZONE, SHORT PLAT, AND WAIVER REQUEST Late May: Initially reviewed with the Peterson ' s , the • Assistant Planning Director, and the Mayor ' s Assistant the feasibility of the request, . possible alternatives , ordinance require= ments , Planning Commission review procedures , and the hearings schedule: They were infor- med that although a proposal might appear to be acceptable , the final decision would be made by the' Planning Commission after a public hearing . The outcome of the hearing was not , and could not be predicted at that time. • May - August: Various Staff members talked to Mr. and Mrs . Peterson on several occasions , reviewing with them the—appl i catton i nstru-cti o-ns ,- Pl a-n-- fling Commission procedures , and the need to justify their request for rezoning , propos- ing a pipestem lot subdivision ,- and waiver of off-site improvements request. August 18: Received applications for rezone, short plat, and written request for waiver of off-site improvements . August 18-25: Review and approval by various City Depart- ments . ' August 26-27 : Publish , post, and distribute public notices of hearing . 4, Harold Peterson• September 16 , 1976 Page Two September 8: Planning Commission Public Hearing and decision. Staff recommendation - approval . September 10 : Letter to Petersons informing them of decision and appeal process . MLS : vb ' C _' . '- —_ __ _.__ _______ Iv 1 - „'.I ( OF REill:O lv / .�' i' i1AYOZ'S OFFICE ..,--6 '7_'1{... ;:4,- -e ,//7°K • • •Y/` 22e, !'v �_/he,ci L.A.. v i4 .I. ,,,i /Il i o4/ - - C_ II/ :�/}-.4..iLQ.�t//'[0 61 "L-r) ./\-- ,7 f tn- tit„ :.cL;�. /_ '''.---..,- -1 Z.4%"-/:1-19' :fr-r-sj *-1-A- /117 e.,,..„...,..„...„,,,.,,,,/ •• L ,. _.,,. ... , . . . . 4 //y').,, . , --X- / % G ' r,t,`(._//_ - ' 2 J 1 �x 4- = ly l''- %21T y' ' • 1/1_,IF ---4,,,.-74 L'<.) „,-)fri...../J-21-:. -;:l --(-c„}:1-4, /21./--', 7,..)0...c1.--,L/2-• ,_ l-1' ��•v emu- .,Li,.p_./ 1 i_.Z 1 i c-0 4J 'Z..1 ,i✓!.(✓ •i/ Je;`!.G'/Lam.{J 1!-✓ L: --L•'✓'1 '---' v <.' 'i/- - -- , - - -- ii.v`-'-' c tir,_.Li,G ,.\!-.1_., 6 1.' 1'.ti -.I[..--7:`_/1--. �. .-/t-'L. (. -%''' (,/' i ��<c/-�"''4-'"X.,: i C.L.�t. .(.�•3:"j .Ni'-•L . _/ U-� i%L[�je�✓ -/ -.__._ -..___ Ls�+� L L�-_ j";; -_..(�<.c G4____.: +� i '_�;LG��r1'__,1=_�L�--- J- C. / �L,/ ',,),,-( 'J_k . i�/1 - iceA./_ R.> .J / r , ' . Ci r �_ ._,� / • . • Cy ,/..!�• :"l,�J�'/••. _t:R--- �/ ..L'�C.;l-6L1 `77�1,.7/✓L Los. . t i,�".._./(,L./1—'� , - . ' - . .. • •. , F' .1, �, �''tr-4 /r / • ! ' :' � �lE� OY �,; { ,7�; ,c cccr' (�lX.s� ��Y tis. t e.0(GL" - u_ .I ;. :` G. �2'7-' /-,ter-C/.=- � iY"T'7.v!- / e--. ..-;:p77 /WC/ / �`� ' _�, yr' y '�',�I /� ''�2�i _.--.'V/ %---)2/ /- 12'77 . (.2-7 7-177-e.77i//-7----,-7---1) . /y r----p ,,_„-- -v/------, ?Y`' H %'fit i %, /. ')� C'rr� 1"r7� ys d/X `J // %"..-"y21/- 71.7. --,1-1;>-.-9.' 4.-O-I,K, L.....-7. ,.7r-2� 5 • /•7 7.P'IYY -:�¢ A.r'y-lid /7., ,; •/,: 7�•,7��; ` /'') ^ �y3/7 �f--- --. /1:3- i/J- ,,,,,, ,,/-(--g72i;-2-,2-7.e_---77/2,--p-2,-- 1:-2-0- 2 -- rvz---7-2--?-1-- 7-7-17-7/— aO .7/l/ 1 -x--)--- - 3:72- /747--r72---: 1?-"" '7''' ---r-2,2.-- /7),--,/-1 "--zr7-72 ,---17--- ;.‘'?:`, -,g---7.-'2---r2--/;?-- ----e-lio �/�r /-? '7-Yi'/' /7�r121 , . r r' vim_ „/1/7�i�..,l" �i/.j^/' ./: %!T;2/N�?,//j-7- f /-1_ ---7----)*%, 7 ' /Ter"?'''::2- --7.--:- --27-7. — --,,,7--2_-:- fy "7/efip--' . 'g .,r 7 J ri-,,,y -6-- ;-, , ,,-___,r,?-iz, -07-„,--x-.7:77/ ,) • 7(1 • — n•e---. 7,-7 --7-7- X ,,,,,„. / -?--7,--)77.--71- - rp-P7-44,- /------.29 7-77-?-7:---6--„7,- -77,--7,-.--,;,7_ (7.„,,,, . „. 7.7 2-- r jig {�_�/ 779 .. . .. . . • . • . _ _ • e... rei.:. • ' . ' if-76/ -1- - I q/-4---- , -----<)-)1_Ze:•iZe-2 e^ • • iy .fr 4i: ./ 4-7,2z7 _a _.,e,,_„, .1... A,„1,,,,._,,g ..„...___ /, / u2- i if. .__1. , - e--",- --e-g.- j 4 . l /I'rs%- ' a_e„ck/s2_ --- / ,6• 1 "___Le --)21, . / , . •Ar _. /Y,__e_i4,144 ,- i------: ..X'-"alek-/-e--- f--1 . 21->"-- A---e7C _, /,,, • • . ,.,.,_.._•,,..-‘.1,__,„,,.._,,,.,......._,_,4.. , , __.„„ --7i / - - 1 A / 7 -r--e--'--5 i. , , • _ ,7,, . . 7- • 1 .,_,_ __,,,;„. • ( z , ,:y? - (— ,.- , . /-....-/ . . , , . • . ,2,, ...!.r /,7.s e,//(-• --, ''- 4)'- -j_ . ' N/ . ," ' - . ./ / • • 1 ,, / . - LA- ii.---2 L/,'_... 7-, . • _ ! /, / ---,--s - " ___ L -7'f-,fk- /A-cc,- ,4 ii/. • ,/,,,,, / , zr---x-- ----" .,---,-.1-• ,,__(._,%,1_,'. ,4 ._./(/./-, /-2t---,-/___ V 2 ,./ . .....-,--- . • ----- --'--7-_,..-. /5('/ ', , ,,.:--ci.--42,-L2_ ...5,./ ()L-;.-‘_. •62A. /di../i7 di/ , --1, - err" .......--,-,?.z. / t:' • ,, Cl'-'<- ,A.-e-f-z---",-e-Z. 722,-( .0-y•-•_r_,..,' .‘s i ___,A/ i . . J../ s.-? -- /-i.-,- //:-c--.:•/Z--• . f--e- .,'•-• ;4-1_, ,..-•- a---./..----•- ://...1,--..7./e a•---"--.."---er.--- ----/-0e- -----71-1-- ' 1 d--/ -. • ..,(_.4,---eti- 221_,-X,". . ..k, l \ .._ \--1 , . in 0___.„,L1 1_....7 . . .. . . , --e"---zi---/. r'- s(S:; 'A-'" • eil ÷ . 671.2Y-.0'.-,- -."--- ' . 7-A.. , _,,,, . . , . , . • Ca_4",-(> 0,1 --t( e,:f•-(zt,":2-e-ee --./..e. - .-6K_ ___. - •---- - • i . 7 / al - ././A-a, ' • ----/c=2-1 zue." _...„..0 ......„,--,-- _--2-z-2---Cy--- (), . ...,„},,..,:,ti -1-,, 1.- ,-- .. .___ • i . rkz N, ,. • . .,:z...„.ffit..,7 ..,,.. ."(,.... ... € _ . ,_. „ ., tf--,, , 47 /4-_,..,-&:,0 ...(;-,/,/-zere" _,... C 2 - ./C-r---- 67-1.t-a" --""--- .,, 1 • .. L-. 2:1L, c./_ - g-,67;-12-.4-,‘L,- /4Ccr. .4. ---- "--/Z.,.,- .,.-- . ;2_/1 — -- ------ — --- . • ----.--..-- --ii• -21/ -•e:2-7-• • /. a--,/, .A6---- --.2,1-0 A ---- -,..z..4_4_,, .iij..0 • L.,—/ ,• / -' /,,a/ --/-z...,-}_o_z....• .....1-04-4-/ Zte:-...,-4eZ 7 4 , . 7/-i• - ,1 .\ 1:-/11-2./ c'/I---/.2#-----,..:/- -,";(-'-tL. &e,-;.,-, _.,. .,e,i,t,,_....e. „.....1-2-/ „---'E...e._ .-.0,-,„.7..,4_,,._.•62/&.L,,e_Z___, .,, • a----2 -.-1-- -1--24--,Z.-,L;a - //41z/ . '../ ., ;., .' 11-Lc-1.%"v "---'i-/-zie--/ 4.-2"--‘- -7-dr---t>i - . .Z.,i...4--/li-•-2- ,--- ---6('-'2---1-7/zz-4-,a,7--/ _ . , . , , ,....-1 1.-,, -1-6' `-'5--zi, --1,..,?,•••-'-' _„, ...4__. _. L,e,--Z:4-•A(../--t /24:2-7 L-12---- 71 Zil ifzej, „, \ 7 ---.1. • -, / `,21-4"--1--6••'./../ ig--6.1-72 7--12-'6-j--/ ..,(.---1/-7f---)m../ 'if ......?../ (...—___-63z,, _.,2:-..i,t,..Z /L.-9 - &' ' 1 / i .ii _ /, ,,, •,..)._-:,--, ,,,,„, 7...e..,• , . -;'' '_.1.--A-.1 "---1• 7L . ,.//z I.• • /c•7 c2.--e Ci.,./..' .,,t;,-.1,61-/ --1/ /'7 7 ,, _ ,,. bw . . .. 4, .-'s-/ ..•-,4-, /7-f.g I ./(/}_• .-"4,/ / i — _1 ... _. ',,. f_e:.-/.1--,/:i'•-/-i---er- '.e b. '''f-W-e-/-,-,-,-:, i„,-_J=e,-, 6Y------- - f, •,,,,,,,,,,,./-2,_ :: .../6— . ete) \(2- • ./.. , .„4.,.\,.'.,4,• // --• •-71/--f. /...-/_.-e-e-s-"--- ) "7:1•••'Zii 1.--,--/--."1----- ..,--e./.•4--!,e_2_e..I--,.-c---/, r4 • 2 -i,-- - 1 . . _ 1-- : . •-r1-- ;') 67.,---1- --- • •. ...,... C,...•% 4x-!_e_il ..-?...":-/ c'-',••a•-•-c.(._._eX. •. • N _II., ... ../ I ,, • ,2 :2--te---'4-'( .,f' 1....L.4-i--.,_. . • 1.c z. !-.4-----1,---_-7, - 47.x _...,,,,,__ze.1_, ., '"_j•,_, , ---12-4--(-e-4-1 /-"--"=" '''---°(-A-' - • . . ), I) 74- - • j ,-, `--c' ---7 e--2. 6-(, / -,•,_.c., - -e-1. ----1- -(1,-e--1.•,.. --y; i•-•-(,_-(/`-i-LIA4- ---- .• 4. • di ('' / '' ', i /. '''-/ If '27:L.. .•1 , ,.. t_ •. ''.Y1 ),,,,,/ d./.',f„."..,-,- .../...j:11., .......(A,ii...,•-• ',--.9:i---1Y.--6....C1" ..1‘..4...• .&el,. -- .". • '_ I l'O 1 7,) '•. ...... Z..I\• _,...„7 / 6 -- I. V. - / .,1! ' ' • rA J.i' tl • 0,..-/----5-:/ 1:) *„.. ....: .:A--.6.e..." :%."---4-- L.. .----•-_,..e-----,--,. .„.,.. . • i • - . -N . 7 • /' 1 I ''' • :I. \ .. /r&,.._ ) -('?1: C.,4-/ , -d/,-1--r_ - z- • "-- ''// ..a_L-7-c-6,5------- ' • _.,,,c- , -,_,__/ , . . 0i) -At- L'.:i.'l.Z..y, ' ) /1...--;-7 / -- 7-ZU?". _ L e--,7--7fr -e_./ GL.,/.4-Z- -7/'•--6,- - A.?' • . L :,.• - i)Lei-74-6"' : /717'-7 Yg--/ /".../...c./..e....- . . A • / /II ., ': \ :•;'-' .72.,. A-6• ' /X/ 'XV ., e...,,c../ . d..i....e.,c -2,".-::•-;/5(-- -.)-7-1:i7-----/;.....6:,--Z,,jt/c-6:46: ji '' -. ;, .1 7/ ' L - -7,' „.i.21%A. (L.„._,d Tr k__,,),(Z f---,, c. .-7 (.:, / • . L„..f :„._,..,. .y-- f.,1(-/ —- ,— - -- - 1. 4 '-' -, .- . . 1 Z.:6,,;_,_ LZ, _4_,•,__,A‘Z'1 ,t / 'ai„t. /i..."- --e-/--d- 4,--/ .111 ' ' .-"1 G h va tJ As o THE CITY OF RENTON .. c MUNICIPAL BUI Lf�1NG 200-MTCC AVE.SO. RENTON-WAS-R:9805� 0 ■••• •• -.7 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 O414 tip SEPTt‘-O September 10, 1 7 p9 6 Harold Peterson 562 Bronson Way N. E. • Renton , . WA 98055 RE : APPLICATION FOR REZONE - #R-882-76 Dear Mr. Peterson : - The Planning Commission at its September 9; 1976 public hearing denied your application for rezone of the property located at 762 Monroe Avenue N. E. The Commission , after consideration of the facts of the proposal , determined that the request was not compatible with surrounding land uses , and that further subdivi - sion of the property would be detrimental to adjacent prop.erties a-nd the unique character of the area.You have the option of requesting to the City Council an appeal of this ruling -within ten (10) days from the date of the ruling . Such an appeal must be submitted in writing to the Planning Depart- ment. If you have further questions , please contact this Department. • Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen - P1 ni 7727)or Michael L . Smith Associate Planner MLS..:vb- . - I ' I /et-se", sitezo.,e_, I i , , •' - Friday;:,September 10, 1976 Record-Chronicle - Section A - Page 3; "i6i s • fi' tr Longwaitpaysoff , . Planners �:. rdensity . er Four hours of waiting;paid, 'ro�ert owned-, Harold Pa,,, etersonto subdivide his lotwould ," i•estem"drivewa .Petersonhad ` g.P ,. P P Y . by, s., � . , PP Y, Wednesday night for a group:=of. Peterson'at 762 Moihroe'Ave.°NE to` ;::'be poor planning that could lead to asked permission to use a 20-foot Highlands residents protesting a' cut'minimum`'lot size from 35,000: 'further subdivision of the large lots wide driveway past the house on the, rezone in their neighborhood. . ;' square',feet to less than.one-third , most in,the development at least t smaller front lot to provide access to 1 , Residents near the 700 block'of', that'size would hurt the neighbor ; feet ?, .::: _ ::4• ' . 'the:10,000:square'foot piece of 1 Monroe Avenue Northeast waited,, .'hood, the commissioners at last , I.The,commission agreed:' :.'1:': '. `• property from Monroe Street. : ' 1 from 8 p.m.until nearly midnight to listened. '-'. • " : 'j B y unanimous vote, planning „Peterson wasn't at the Wednesday be heard by the Renton Planning,' Neighbors led by Mike Smith,3402 cbmmissioners rejected.Peterson's ,night meeting to,defend his request. Commission Wednesday: .4.• :,;,•':, • NE Seventh,said the area is"unique: request to subdivide his property'.;. .Now;:if he wants to try again foil 1 But when neighbors told the coin-; ; country surrounded by the ;;; into an 8,000 square foot lot"and a.,:-•permission to subdivide, he'll have 1 mission they feared;rezoning of. bustling city:".He•Said permitting,,.•10,000 square foot lot served by a ;.-.to appeal to the Renton Council. j , ,• 1 1 v I I I. I , 8, 1976 (0--F-7--r---- SeptemberECFIVEo p\\ TO: Renton Planning Commission �, SE/ S ha6 RE: Harold P. Peterson Rezone \ -I _ // / m. Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission: _Y�NG TI:4? We, the undersigned, are opposed to the Harold P. Peterson rezone, from GS-I to SR-I (Appli. R-882-76) . This rezone would be detrimental to the surrounding properties and not- in the best interests of the community. NAME ADDRESS 97re e rni?3. '716:.watzt.. 4-. S40Z 7±1 r 12. � nn i S. .To& ,C . e I�QE 1 - 33.2a i ;.E: 7'---6 6-4 - - '773- 7--— -:-.-:-/---z-----<----2---/ - .2. ---GP /,. -7--,9-e_.; ,;(--/-:el- -'7'.;1 6.( 7;2A /7/ , ?7,- ei-_, i _ ,, f -Z . 'c.-,�--ic.<.-I -2____ ,33. 2,3 - �" 1' ^� a 9 'Al 1 G G� . ; / _ cr� , a,✓ 7 //, C- f ;IX STAFF REPORT �` PAGE FOUR SEPTEMBER 8 , 1976 APPLICATION : REZONE FILE R-882-76 REZONE RESUEST FROM GS-1 0 SR-1, STNGLE FAMELr RE$TDENTIAL APPLICANT: HAROLD AND DEANE PETERSON LOCATION : 762 MONROE AVE . N . E . ZONING : GS-1 (35 ,000 Sq . foot min . lot size) APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF 4-729 ; 4-704. ZONING CODE : COMMENTS : 1 . Property consists of approximately one-half acre and contains an existing small house , and garage . 2 . The rezone request is necessary in order to provide standard single family residential zoning and lot sizes so that the property can fl be subdivided into 2 parcels . '1 il tl 3 . The proposed short plat will consist of lots , a front lot consisting, of apprdxim tely 8 ,000 sq . ft . with the existing small ho se and garage to remain , and a rear lot con _ �sisting of approximately 10 ,000 sq . ft . and served by a 20 foot wide by 100 foot. deep pipe-stem . I : 4 . The area across Monroe Ave . N . E . and west • , of the subject site is presently zoned R-1 . !o The area surrounding the site is zoned , ;i GS-1 . However , there have been parcels rezoned to both SR-1 and R-1 in the general area . 5 . Existing land use consists of single family ` residential around the site . The church , Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints , is j located directly across the street to the west. 6 . The existing lots in the immediate area ; within Stewart Acre tracts subdivision have not been extensively subdivided to date . DECISION CONSIDERATIONS : Approval because it is consistant with existing single family development in the area , existing zoning , and the Comprehensive Plan for the area . , ,i 1 , , .yl v / STAFF REPORT PAGE FIVE '` SEPTEMBER 8 , 1976 APPLICATION : WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS REQUIREMENT FOR A PROPOSED 2 LOT SHORT PLAT , FILE W-883-76 APPLICANT: HAROLD AND DEANE PETERSON LOCATION : 762 MONROE AVE . N . E . COMMENTS : 1 . Applicant is requesting a rezone to SR-1 single family residential together with' a two. lot short plat . 2 . The Subdivision Ordinance requires curb , gutter , and sidewalk along a public street adjacent to any subdivision . 3. There may be a problem of establishing proper grade along Monroe for off-site improvement location and driveway access via the pipe- stem to the proposed rear lot . 4 . Although similar ofif-site improvements r exist in the general area , none exist in the immediate vicinity of the subject site . DECISION CONSIDERATIONS : Approval subject to signning_ and filing of standard indefinite deferral restrictive covenants . APPLICATION : WAIVER OFF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENT FOR A PROPOSED 2 LOT SHORT PLAT , FILE W-878-76 APPLICANT: E . H . WILSON LOCATION : BETWEEN 309 AND 217 N .W. 7TH ST . (SO . 122ND ST . ) ZONING : SR-1 COMMENTS : 1 . N . W. 7th is actually within King County , the city limits being . located along its south boundary. As a result , if the improvements are required , construction will be subject to County approval . 2 . The property was recently rezoned to SR-1 . 3 . The applicant proposes a 2 lot short plat , containing approximately 8200 and 9500 square feet each . 4 , There are no similar improvements in the general area . N . W. 7th St . is a dead-end • street . A small sidewalk only exists along 87th St . , the primary; arterial in the area . 5 . An engineering report regarding the stability of the fill area for ' building purposes will be required prior to approval of any building permit. DECISION CONSIDERATION : Approval subject to signing and filing of standard indefinite deferral restrictive covenants . 1 x .r, I N T E B 0 F2r I C E C 0 R R E S f` 0 8/ D E N C E Date ' August 23, 1976 ' TO; Planning FROM: Utilities . SUBJECT: Harold Peterson Rezone rt ^ The Utilities Division has ample capacity to serve the above property with water and sewer service. Fire hydrant requirements, if any, will .be developed by the fire Dapt. The parcels o' t6a short plat will ' be,subject to facilYt}as pTant charges at the rate of l�/ft� for sewer and lt/ft� for water. The parcels will be subject to any late commersfaa/ s for piping flacllltlms in Monroe Ave. N.E. VOL- ' ` - - -- - - - ' ~ ` r-~ ' ' : - -• •„, - , -R-O-UTE--S-C-HE-DULE— _ : PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE ROUTED 00, / PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR: - --6-E-Ttlip- - --:: - - - - - --: ---- . -- - LMAJORTPLAT- - -- - - - SITE APPROVAL ___ SHORT PLAT SPECIAL PERMIT ___ WAIVER SHORELINE MANAGEMENT •,,,.- PERMIT OR EXEMPTION 64gsr,“? 1. XI-eV-So:3 AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE 392474 ' SIGNATURE ' OR , , INITAL DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DENIAL DATE 1 --k ,... BUILDING >4 .....olm=, ,...„ 73f.a.a TRAFFIC E . . )‹: .:30.4.. -91---- ENGINEERI FIRE HEALTH PCar 6 REVIEWER ' S COMMENTS OR APPROVAL CONDITIONS : It. S IbC- %.44410 44Q,57-- rSt- "4/ fob See. U41ette4 >604- nile"tio • PLEASE SIGN THE E . I .W . :