HomeMy WebLinkAboutAdden 03 Washington State
40 CAG-09-077, Adden #3-10
VA# Department of Transportation
Supplemental Agreement Organization and Address
h 1" g BergerABAM Inc.
Number 3 33301 Ninth Avenue S., Suite 300
Federal Way,WA 98003
Original Agreement Number
CAG-09-077 Phone: 206/431-2300
Project Number Execution Date Completion Date
4/17/2009 10/31/2011
Project Title New Maximum Amount Payable
Update Project Definition Report, Strander Blvd. $ 2,214,900.00
Description of Work
Additional tasks are added as described in the attached under Sections II and IV.
The Local Agency of City of Renton
desires to supplement Q
e the agreement entered into with BerberABAM Inc.
and executed on 4/17/2009 and identified as Agreement No. CAG-09-077
All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement.
The changes to the agreement are described as follows:
Section 1, SCOPE OF WORK, is hereby changed to read:
Sea attached
I I
Section IV, TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION, is amended to change the number of calendar days for
completion of the work to read: See attached
I11
Section V, PAYMENT, shall be amended as follows:
See attached
If you concur with this supplement and agree to the changes as stated above, please sign in the appropriate spaces
below and return to this office for final action.
By: By: Denis Law, Mayor
Consultant Signature Approving Authority Signature
Attest -
DOT Form 140-063 EF Bonnie I . Walton, City Clerk
Revised 9/2005
SECTION II SCOPE OF WORK
Add the following to this section.
This supplement provides scopes of work for five primary tasks to be completed for this
PROJECT as listed in the below table under Section IV. The scopes of work for these primary
tasks are detailed in Exhibit"A" to this supplement.
SECTION IV TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION
Replace this section with the following.
Work under this agreement is broken into eight primary tasks as shown in the table below and
as defined in Exhibit A. Each primary task will be given a separate notice to proceed(NTP)by
the City of Renton. The CONSULTANT shall not begin work on any task until receipt of a
written NTP for that task. The City of Renton may not issue a NTP on a primary task until the
precursor primary task for that primary task, as defined in Exhibit A,has been completed or is
nearing completion.
The following schedule is agreed to establish the basis for determination of the fees for this
AGREEMENT.
Primary Primary Task Description Primary Task Primary Task Primary Task
Task ID Start Date Duration Fee without
Management
Reserve
Task 100 Define final project configuration for 1 Feb 2010 2 months $113,000
approval. This task will be completed
prior to other tasks.
Task 200 Define BNSF bridge configuration for 1 Apr 2010 8 months $636,000
final design and construction by
BNSF
Task 300 Support the City of Renton during To be addressed To be addressed To be addressed
final bridge design and construction in a future in a future in a future
by BNSF. This task will be completed supplement supplement supplement
after Task 200.
Task 400 Complete 30 percent design for BNSF 1 lul 2010 4 months $198,000
underpass. This task will be
completed after parts of Task 200
are completed.
Task 500 Complete 30 percent design for the 1 Dec 2010 10 months $795,000
UPRR underpass. This task will be
completed after parts of Task 200
and 400 are completed.
Task 600 Complete 30 percent design of the To be addressed To be addressed To be addressed
connection from the underpass to the in a future in a future in a future
Sounder Station I supplement supplement supplement
•
Primary Primary Task Description Primary Task Primary Task Primary Task
Task ID Start Date Duration Fee without
Management
Reserve
Task 700 Assess the feasibility and costs 1 Feb 2010 7 months $353,000
associated with at-grade connections
to the Sounder Station. Develop 35
percent PS&E for the selected
alternative.
Task 800 Develop final PS&E for the selected To be addressed To be addressed To be addressed
alternative. in a future in a future in a future
supplement supplement supplement
The City of Renton and the CONSULTANT will work together to finalize a timeline for
completion of each primary task upon receipt of a written NTP. If the NTP for any primary task
is received after the dates shown in the above table, the City of Renton and the CONSULTANT
will work together to determine additional costs, if any, associated with completion of that task.
These additional costs will be authorized from the management reserve or will be addressed in
a future supplement to this AGREEMENT.
The established completion time for each primary task shall not be extended because of any
delays attributable to the CONSULTANT,but may be extended by the City of Renton in the
event of a delay attributable to the City of Renton, or because of unavoidable delays caused by
an act of GOD or governmental actions of other conditions beyond the control of the
CONSULTANT.
All work under this AGREEMENT shall be completed by the date shown in the heading of this
AGREEMENT under completion time. A prior supplemental agreement issued by the City of
Renton is required to extend this established completion time.
The completion date for this agreement is revised to be 31 October 2011.
SECTION V PAYMENT PROVISIONS
Add the following to this section
The payment provisions for this AGREEMENT are revised to be paid for on the basis of
negotiated hourly rates as define in Exhibit D-3 for additional work under this supplement.
g Y PP
Payment for work provided under the-initial agreement and Supplement 1 will remain to be
paid for on a lump-sum basis.
Upon receipt of a written NTP for Task 700, the CONSULTANT shall finalize fees from
subconsultants required to develop parts of the work as defined in Exhibit A for this primary
task. Additional fees, if any,required to complete this primary task shall be authorized from
the management reserve or will be addressed in a future supplement.
SECTION VI SUBCONTRACTING
Add the following to this section.
The following subconsultants are authorized to perform work under this AGREEMENT.
• Hanson Professional Services Inc.
• Shannon&Wilson, Inc.
• Perteet Engineering Inc
i
Local Agency Consultant/Address/Telephone
BergerABAM Inc.
Standard Consultant 33301 Ninth Avenue S., Suite 300
Agreement Federal Way,WA 98003
®Architectural/Engineering Agreement
❑ Personal Services Agreement 206/431-2300
Agreement Number
CAG-09-077 Project Title And Work Description
Federal Aid Number Supplement No. 3 to
Strander Boulevard Extension Project
Agreement Type(Choose one)
❑ Lump Sum
Lump Sum Amount $
❑ Cost Plus Fixed Fee
Overhead Progress Payment Rate
Overhead Cost Method DBE Participation
❑ Actual Cost ❑ Yes ® No %
Federal ID Number or Social Security Number
❑ Actual Cost Not To Exceed % 91-1422812
❑ Fixed Overhead Rate % Do you require a 1099 for IRS? Completion Date
Fixed Fee $ ❑Yes ® No October 31, 2011
® Specific Rates Of Pay Total Amount Authorized $ 2,095,000.00
® Negotiated Hourly Rate for Supplement No. 3
❑ Provisional Hourly Rate
Management Deserve Fund $ 100,000.00
❑ Cost Per Unit of Work Maximum Amount Payable $ 2,195,000.00
for Supplement Ne. 3
Index of Exhibits (Check all that apply):
® Exhibit A-1 Scope of Work Exhibit G-2 Fee-
Sub Specific Rates
❑ Exhibit A-2 Task Order Agreement ❑ Exhibit G-3 Sub Overhead Cost
❑ Exhibit B-1 DBE Utilization Certification ❑ Exhibit H Title VI Assurances
❑ Exhibit C Electronic Exchange of Data ® Exhibit I Payment Upon Termination of Agreement
❑ Exhibit D-1 Payment-Lump Sum ❑ Exhibit J Alleged Consultant Design Error Procedures
❑ Exhibit D-2 Payment-Cost Plus ❑ Exhibit K Consultant Claim Procedures
® Exhibit D-3 Payment-Hourly Rate ❑Exhibit L Liability Insurance Increase
❑ Exhibit D-4 Payment-Provisional ❑ Exhibit M-la Consultant Certification
❑ Exhibit E-1 Fee-Lump/Fixed/Unit ❑ Exhibit M-lb Agency Official Certification
® Exhibit E-2 Fee-Specific Rates ❑ Exhibit M-2 Certification-Primary
❑ Exhibit F Overhead Cost ❑ Exhibit M-3 Lobbying Certification
❑ Exhibit G Subcontracted Work ❑ Exhibit M-4 Pricing Data Certification
❑ Exhibit G-1 Subconsultant Fee ❑App.31.910 Supplemental Signature Page
I
DOT Form 140-089 EF
Revised 3/2008
TABLE OF CONTENTS
STRANDER BOULEVARD EXTENSION
SECTION PAGE
EXHIBITA- SCOPE OF WORK............................................................................................................1
ProjectBackground...............................................................................................................................1
PROJECTPARAMETERS.......................................................................................................................3
TASK 100-DEFINE FINAL PROJECT CONFIGURATION FOR APPROVAL..........................4
Task100 Assumptions..........................................................................................................................4
Task100 Deliverable(s)........................................................................................................................4
TASK 110-PROJECT ADMINISTRATION.......................................................................................4
Task111-Project Setup.......................................................................................................................4
Task 112-Invoicing and Progress Reports......................................................................................4
Task 113-Subconsultant Coordination...........................................................................................4
Task 114-Project Management and Administration....................................................................5
Task115-Meetings with City............................................................................................................5
Task 116-Quality Assurance and Control......................................................................................5
TASK 120-PRELIMINARY STUDIES AND INVESTIGATIONS................................................5
Task 121-Railroad Right-of-Entries (ROE).....................................................................................5
Task122-Survey..................................................................................................................................5
TASK 130-PRELIMINARY PLANS,PROFILES,AND SECTIONS.............................................5
Task131-Design Parameters.............................................................................................................5
Task 132-Determine Horizontal and Vertical Alignment...........................................................5
Task133-Roadway Sections..............................................................................................................5
Task 134-Prepare Project Configuration Plans for Approval.....................................................6
Task 135-City of Renton Approval..................................................................................................6
TASK 200-DEFINE BNSF BRIDGE CONFIGURATION FOR FINAL DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTIONBY BNSF...................................................................................................................6
Task200 Assumptions:.........................................................................................................................6
Task200 Deliverable(s)........................................................................................................................6
TASK 210-PROJECT ADMINISTRATION.......................................................................................7
Task211-Project Setup.......................................................................................................................7
Scope of Work BergerABAM,FPPWT-09-253
Strander Boulevard Extension December 2009
City of Renton Exhibit A Page ii
Task 212-Invoicing and Progress Reports......................................................................................7
Task 213-Subconsultant Coordination...........................................................................................7
Task 214-Project Management and Administration....................................................................7
Task215-Meetings with City............................................................................................................7
Task 216-Quality Assurance and Control......................................................................................7
TASK 220-PRELIMINARY STUDIES AND INVESTIGATIONS................................................7
Task 221-Railroad Right-of-Entries (ROE).....................................................................................7
Task222-Survey..................................................................................................................................7
Task223-Geotechnical.......................................................................................................................8
TASK 230-PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND DESIGN.........................................................9
Task 231-Underpass Wall/BNSF Bridge Foundation Alternatives............................................9
Task 232-Bottom Seal Alternatives..................................................................................................9
Task233-Utilities................................................................................................................................9
Task234-Construction Staging......................................................................................................10
TASK 240-PRELIMINARY BNSF DESIGN, COORDINATION,AND APPROVALS..........10
Task 241-Develop Conceptual BNSF Plans.................................................................................10
Task 242-BNSF Bridge Type, Size, and Location (TS&L) Report............................................11
Task 243-Preliminary Shoofly Design..........................................................................................11
Task 244-30 Percent BNSF Review Submittal.............................................................................11
Task 245-Preliminary Review of C&M Agreement...................................................................11
TASK250-OTHER TASKS.................................................................................................................12
Task 251-Determine Additional ROW,Easement,and BNSF ROW Permit Needs.............12
Task 252-Coordinate with Environmental Studies and Permitting........................................12
TASK 260-30 PERCENT PLANS AND ESTIMATE.......................................................................12
Task261-30 percent Plans................................................................................................................12
Task 262-30 Percent Cost Estimate.................................................................................................13
TASK 300-SUPPORT THE CITY OF RENTON DURING FINAL BRIDGE DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTIONBY BNSF.................................................................................................................13
TASK 400-COMPLETE 30%DESIGN FOR THE BNSF UNDERPASS.....................................13
Task400 Assumptions........................................................................................................................13
Task400 Deliverable(s)......................................................................................................................14
TASK 410-PROJECT ADMINISTRATION.....................................................................................14
Task411-Project Setup..................:..................................................................................................14
Scope of Work BergerABAM,FPPWT-09-253
Strander Boulevard Extension December 2009
City of Renton Exhibit A Page iii
Task 412-Invoicing and Progress Reports....................................................................................14
Task 413-Subconsultant Coordination.........................................................................................14
Task 414-Project Management and Administration..................................................................14
Task415-Meetings with City..........................................................................................................14
Task 416-Quality Assurance and Control....................................................................................14
TASK 420-PRELIMINARY STUDIES AND INVESTIGATIONS..............................................15
Task 421-Railroad Right-of-Entries(ROE)...................................................................................15
TASK 430-PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND DESIGN.......................................................15
Task 431-Stormwater Report..........................................................................................................15
Task 432-Construction Phasing and Staging...............................................................................16
TASK 440-OTHER TASKS.................................................................................................................16
Task 441-Determine Additional ROW and Easement Needs...................................................16
Task 442-Coordinate with Environmental Studies and Permitting........................................16
Task443-Public Involvement.........................................................................................................17
Task 444-Funding Assistance.........................................................................................................17
TASK 450-30 PERCENT PLANS AND ESTIMATE........................................................................17
Task451-30 percent Plans................................................................................................................17
Task 452-30 Percent Cost Estimate.................................................................................................17
TASK 500-COMPLETE 30%DESIGN FOR THE UPRR UNDERPASS.....................................18
Task500 Assumptions........................................................................................................................18
Task500 Deliverable(s)......................................................................................................................18
TASK 510-PROJECT ADMINISTRATION.....................................................................................18
Task511-Project Setup.....................................................................................................................18
Task 512-Invoicing and Progress Reports....................................................................................19
Task 513-Subconsultant Coordination.........................................................................................19
Task 514-Project Management and Administration..................................................................19
Task515-Meetings with City..........................................................................................................19
Task 516-Quality Assurance and Control....................................................................................19
TASK 520-PRELIMINARY STUDIES AND INVESTIGATIONS..............................................19
Task521-Traffic Studies..................................................................................................................19
Task 522-Railroad Right-of-Entries(ROE)...................................................................................22
Task523-Survey................................................................................................................................22
Scope of Work BergerABAM,FPPWT-09-253
Strander Boulevard Extension December 2009
City of Renton Exhibit A Page iv
0 •
Task524—Geotechnical.....................................................................................................................23
TASK 530—PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND DESIGN.......................................................24
Task531—Trail Alternatives.............................................................................................................24
Task 532—Secondary Access to Sounder Station..........................................................................24
Task533—Driveways.........................................................................................................................24
Task534—Traffic Signals..................................................................................................................24
Task535—Utilities..............................................................................................................................25
Task 536—Stormwater Report..........................................................................................................26
Task537—Construction Staging......................................................................................................27
TASK 540-PRELIMINARY UPRR DESIGN,COORDINATION,AND APPROVALS .........27
Task 541-Develop Conceptual UPRR Plans.................................................................................27
Task 542-UPRR Bridge Type, Size,and Location Report(TS&L)...........................................27
Task 543-Preliminary Shoofly Design..........................................................................................28
Task 544-30 Percent UPRR Review Submittal............................................................................28
Task 545-Preliminary Review of C&M Agreement...................................................................28
TASK 550-OTHER TASKS.................................................................................................................29
Task 551-Determine Additional ROW,Easement,and UPRR ROW Permit Needs............29
Task 552-Coordinate with Environmental Studies and Permitting........................................29
Task553-Public Involvement.........................................................................................................29
Task554-Funding Assistance.........................................................................................................30
TASK 560-30 PERCENT PLANS AND ESTIMATE........................................................................30
Task561-30 percent Plans................................................................................................................30
Task 562-30 Percent Cost Estimate.................................................................................................30
TASK 600-COMPLETE 30%DESIGN OF THE CONNECTION FROM THE UNDERPASS
TO THE SOUNDER STATION............................................................................................................31
TASK 700-ASSESS THE FEASIBILITY AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH AT-GRADE
CONNECTIONS TO THE SOUNDER STATION...........................................................................31
Task700 Assumptions........................................................................................................................31
Task700 Deliverable(s)......................................................................................................................32
TASK 710-PROJECT ADMINISTRATION.....................................................................................32
Task711-Project Setup.....................................................................................................................32
Task 712-Invoicing and Progress Reports....................................................................................32
Task 713-Subconsultant Coordination.........................................................................................32
Scope of Work BergerABAM,FPPWT-09-253
Strander Boulevard Extension December 2009
City of Renton Exhibit A Page v
0 . •
Task 714-Project Management and Administration..................................................................32
Task715-Meetings with City..........................................................................................................32
Task 716-Quality Assurance and Control....................................................................................33
TASK 720-PRELIMINARY STUDIES AND INVESTIGATIONS..............................................33
Task 721-Railroad Right-of-Entries (ROE)...................................................................................33
Task722-Survey................................................................................................................................33
TASK 730-PRELIMINARY PLANS, PROFILES,AND SECTIONS...........................................33
Task 731-Design Parameters...............................................................:...........................................33
Task 732-Determine Horizontal and Vertical Alignment.........................................................33
Task 733-Coordinate Access through BNSF ROW with BNSF................................................33
Task 734-Develop Geotechnical Design Memorandum...........................................................33
Task 735-Develop At-Grade Alternative Drainage and Water Quality Preliminary
Designs..................................................................................................................................................34
Task 736-Develop At-Grade Alternative Maintenance and Protection of Utility
PreliminaryDesigns...........................................................................................................................34
Task737-Roadway Sections............................................................................................................34
Task 738-Prepare Preliminary Drawings.....................................................................................34
Task 739-Prepare Project Cost Estimates for At-Grade Alternatives......................................34
Task 740-Prepare Draft and Final Design Memorandum including Preliminary Project
CostEstimates and Drawings...........................................................................................................34
Task 741-City of Renton Comment/Approval.............................................................................35
TASK 750-DEVELOP 35 PERCENT PS&E FOR SELECTED ALTERNATIVE.........................35
TASK 800-DEVELOP FINAL PS&E FOR SELECTED AT-GRADE ALTERNATIVE.............35
Scope of Work BergerABAM,FPPWT-09-253
Strander Boulevard Extension December 2009
City of Renton Exhibit A Page A
i r
EXHIBIT A-SCOPE OF WORK
Project Background
In about 2001, the City of Renton, in association with the City of Tukwila, started working on a
roadway connecting the eastern terminus of Strander Boulevard in Tukwila to the western
terminus of Southwest 27th Street in Renton. The primary issue with this connection was the
need to cross the Union Pacific Railroad(UPRR) and the BNSF Railway (BNSF) tracks. Given
the high speeds and high volumes of the trains on these tracks, the crossings were to be grade
separated.
The City's first task was to prepare a project definition report,which was completed in 2002.
The project definition report looked at different ways to grade separate the roadway from the
two railroads. After screening alternatives and meetings with a stakeholder's committee, the
recommendation was to build a five-lane roadway beneath the two railroads. However, as the
design started to move forward for the underpass, one of the other alternatives from the report
gained favor. That alternative was to move the UPRR track over next to the BNSF tracks,
allowing the roadway to cross over all the tracks. This alternative had the advantage of trading
land between the tracks for land that would be vacated by UPRR and not be between the tracks.
The increased accessibility of the land acquired in the trade would potentially allow more
transit oriented development related to the Sounder Station.
The cities of Renton and Tukwila have been pursuing this alternative for several years now,
including significant progress on the plans for the relocated UPRR track. However,UPRR has
never given a final approval to the plan to move their track. Although the plan is still under
negotiation, Sound Transit has just about run out of time to commit to the final design of their
Sounder Commuter Rail Station. If and when they commit to building their station between the
tracks in their existing locations, the option to move the UPRR track will be lost. Without
moving the UPRR tracks, the option to build a cost-effective and functional overpass will also
be lost.
Subsequent discussions with BNSF and less optimistic economic and development growth
forecasts have caused the cities of Renton and Tukwila to reassess their plans for extending the
Strander corridor from its existing terminus at Southwest 27th Street to West Valley Highway.
Accordingly, the City of Renton has requested that BergerABAM evaluate the feasibility and
costs associated with gaining access to the Sounder Commuter Rail Station in one of the
following four ways.
Alternative A-Connect Renton to the Sounder Station by extending Southwest 27th Street
westward to the edge of the BNSF right-of-way (ROW) and then northward to a parking lot(or
parking along the N-S roadway) connecting to the pedestrian undercrossing beneath the BNSF
tracks to the Sounder Station.
Alternative B-Connect Renton to the Sounder Station by extendin g Southwest 27th Street
westward to the edge of the BNSF ROW, then northward to Longacres Way, then westward
Scope of Work BergerABAM,FPPWT-09-253
Strander Boulevard Extension December 2009
City of Renton Exhibit A Page 1
under the BNSF tracks via a reconstructed Longacres Way undercrossing to the Sounder Station
parking lot. Longacres Way will be lowered to provide for BNSF required vertical clearance.
Longacres Way will be widened to provide for pedestrian,bicycle, and vehicle traffic into the
Sounder Station. It is our understanding that a companion BNSF project will reconstruct,
widen, or replace the existing BNSF bridge over Longacres Way. The reconstruction of
Longacres Way will be coordinated with this BNSF project,but engineering and/or PS&E for the
BNSF project is not included in this scope of work.
Alternative C—Connect Renton to the Sounder Station by extending Southwest 27th Street
westward to the edge of the BNSF ROW, then northward to Southwest 16th Street and
terminating at the widened Southwest 16th Street segment. A parking lot(or parking along the
N-S roadway) will be constructed adjacent to the pedestrian undercrossing beneath the BNSF
tracks accessing the Sounder Station.
Alternative D—Connect Renton to the Sounder Station by extending Southwest 27th Street
westward to the edge of the BNSF ROW, then northward to Southwest 16th Street and
terminating at the widened Southwest 16th Street segment. Connection to the Sounder Station
or the Sounder Station parking lot will be under the BNSF tracks via a reconstructed Longacres
Way undercrossing to the Sounder Station parking lot. Longacres Way will be lowered to
provide for BNSF required vertical clearance. Longacres Way will be widened to provide for
pedestrian,bicycle, and vehicle traffic into the Sounder Station. It is our understanding that a
companion BNSF project will reconstruct, widen,or replace the existing BNSF bridge over
Longacres Way. The reconstruction of Longacres Way will be coordinated with this BNSF
project,but engineering and/or PS&E for the BNSF project is not included in this scope of work.
In anticipation of constructing the undercrossing along the Strander corridor along with
assessing the less costly street connections to the Sounder Station, the City of Renton has
contracted with BergerABAM to advance the design of the Strander Boulevard Extension. This
will be done with a single contract broken down into eight primary tasks, each of which will be
given a separate notice to proceed(NTP)by the City of Renton. These eight primary tasks are
as follows.
• Task 100-Define final project configuration for approval
• Task 200-Define BNSF bridge configuration for final design and construction by BNSF
• Task 300-Support the City of Renton during final bridge design and construction by BNSF
• Task 400-Complete 30 percent design for the BNSF underpass
• Task 500-Complete 30 percent design for the UPRR underpass
• Task 600-Complete 30 percent design of the connection from the underpass to the Sounder
Station
Scope of Work BergerABAM,FPPWT-09-253
Strander Boulevard Extension December 2009
City of Renton Exhibit A Page 2
0 0
• Task 700—Assess the feasibility and costs associated with at-grade connections to the
Sounder Station. Select the preferred alternative (by the City of Renton). Develop the
design of the preferred alternative to 35 percent.
• Task 800—Develop PS&E for the preferred at-grade connection to the Sounder Station.
This scope of work covers Tasks 100, 200,400,500, and 700. Due to the uncertainty of the scope
for Tasks 300, 600, and 800, they will be scoped at a later date.
Work under this agreement is broken into eight primary tasks as described above. Some
primary tasks must be completed or be near completion prior to commencing work on other
primary tasks. Precursor primary tasks for primary tasks are shown in the table below.
Primary Task Precursor Primary Tasks
Task 100 None
Task 200 Task 100
Task 300 Task 200
Task 400 Task 100 and parts of Task 200
Task 500 Task 100 and parts of Tasks 200 and 400
Task 600 Task 100
Task 700 None
Task 800 Task 700
A management reserve has been provided with this supplement to provide for inefficiencies in
work flow to accomplish the work in separate discrete tasks rather than as a single work
element.
PROJECT PARAMETERS
The following is a list of assumptions that the scope of work, schedule, and the fee estimate are
based on. Assumptions relevant to specific tasks are listed with those tasks.
• This scope assumes that the UPRR track will not be moved and, therefore, an underpass is
the only acceptable grade separation for the UPRR and BNSF tracks staying within their
existing ROW. This scope will not do any further engineering on an overpass or moving the
UPRR track.
• BergerABAM will submit one draft and one final version of each deliverable to the City.
Scope of Work BergerABAM,FPPWT-09-253
Strander Boulevard Extension December 2009
City of Renton Exhibit A Page 3
TASK 100 - DEFINE FINAL PROJECT CONFIGURATION FOR APPROVAL
Task 100 Assumptions
• Task 100 will be completed two months after NTP.
• No traffic studies, geotechnical work, or utility investigations will be done for this task.
While not anticipated,it is possible that further studies in these disciplines in later tasks
could change the plan,profile, and/or sections developed in this task.
• All of the existing survey is still accurate and the only additional survey needed for this task
will be for the new western terminus of Southwest 27th Street.
• This new section of Strander will have a minimum of five lanes and be a minimum of 60 feet
wide face of curb to face of curb.
• The profile at the BNSF bridge will be based on the possibility of a bridge about 30 feet
longer than the back of sidewalk to back of sidewalk distance.
• Approval of these plans,profiles, and sections by the City of Renton will be required to
proceed to Task 200. It will be up to the City of Renton to determine if they want to get
approval from Tukwila, the Washington State Department of Transportation(WSDOT),
UPRR, BNSF, and Sound Transit for the preliminary plans,profiles, and sections.
Task 100 Deliverable(s)
• Updated base map
• Project configuration plans for approval
TASK 110 - PROJECT ADMINISTRATION
Task 111- Project Setup
Project files will be setup and subconsultant agreements will be prepared. This task will take
care of all the subconsultant agreements regardless of which primary task the subconsultant's
work is included in.
Task 112 - Invoicing and Progress Reports
Monthly invoices and progress reports will be prepared. It is assumed there will be two
invoices and progress reports.
Task 113 -Subconsultant Coordination
This task will include BergerABAM's time handling administrative and contract-related issues
with the subconsultants. Subconsultants for this project include Hanson Professional Services
Inc.-Railroad Engineering;Shannon&Wilson, Inc.-Geotechnical Engineering; and Perteet,
Inc.-Traffic,Surveying, and Signals/Illumination. Subconsultants for Task 100 include Perteet
and Hanson Professional Services.
Scope of Work BergerABAM,FPPWT-09-253
Strander Boulevard Extension December 2009
City of Renton Exhibit A Page 4
0 0
Task 114 - Project Management and Administration
This task will include BergerABAM's time handling administrative and contract-related issues
with the City.
Task 115 - Meetings with City
tY
It is assumed there will be four meetings in Renton and/or on site. Each meeting will be
attended by two BergerABAM staff members and one subconsultant staff member.
Task 116 - Quality Assurance and Control
All submittals to the City,including all subconsultant submittals,will be reviewed by the
BergerABAM project manager or project engineer. All changes from those reviews will be
incorporated prior to the submittal being sent to the City.
TASK 120 - PRELIMINARY STUDIES AND INVESTIGATIONS
Task 121- Railroad Right-of-Entries(ROE)
BergerABAM and subconsultant staff that have need to visit the site will need to attend railroad
safety training through www.contractororientation.com and e-railsafe, and acquire the
mandatory railroad right-of-entry certifications.
Task 122 -Survey
Topographic field survey will be completed for the new western terminus of Southwest 27th
Street where the new Strander alignment will tie in. This task will include recovering and
reestablishing horizontal and vertical control and updating the existing base map and digital
terrain model(DTM).
TASK 130 - PRELIMINARY PLANS, PROFILES,AND SECTIONS
Task 131 - Design Parameters
BergerABAM will research City, railroad,WSDOT, and other pertinent standards and establish
the design parameters for the total project.
Task 132 - Determine Horizontal and Vertical Alignment
BergerABAM will determine the horizontal and vertical alignment of the final underpass based
on the design parameters established in the previous task.
Task 133 - Roadway Sections
The purpose of this task will be to set the roadway cross sections and channelization for the
entire project. BergerABAM will determine all the plan view dimensions from back of sidewalk
to back of sidewalk for Strander, for the intersections at the east and west ends of this new
section of Strander, and for the access to the Sounder Station. Decisions will include
• Width of through lanes
• Width of bike lanes,if any
• Width and placement of sidewalks and/or combined sidewalk/bike path
• Width and placement of landscape strips/medians,if any
Scope of Work BergerABAM,FPPWT-09-253
Strander Boulevard Extension December 2009
City of Renton Exhibit A Page 5
0 9
■ Width and length of turn lanes and tapers at the intersections
Task 134 - Prepare Project Configuration Plans for Approval
BergerABAM will use the results of the previous tasks to prepare preliminary plans,profiles,
and sections of the final project.
Task 135 - City of Renton Approval
BergerABAM will submit the preliminary plans,profiles, and sections to the City for approval.
TASK 200 - DEFINE BNSF BRIDGE CONFIGURATION FOR FINAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION BY
BNSF
Task 200 Assumptions:
• NTP for Task 200 will not be given until the City of Renton has formally approved the
preliminary plans,profiles, and sections from Task 100. These plans,profiles, and sections
will be the basis for all the geometry for Task 200.
• Task 200 will be completed eight months after NTP.
• The City of Renton will complete all the necessary environmental documents and permits
for the construction of the BNSF bridge and shoofly. BergerABAM will supply information
to the City as needed to complete this work. No traffic studies will be needed to complete
the environmental documents and permits.
• All of the existing survey is still accurate and the only additional survey needed for this task
will be for the potential north-south swaths where the BNSF shooflies might be and for
utility locations. However, extra hours will be included for additional survey as needed and
as directed during this task.
• Existing horizontal and vertical survey control will not need to be recovered or
reestablished since that was done in Task 100.
• The BNSF bridge will be supported on a section of the final BNSF underpass structure,
including underpass walls and/or bottom seal and/or struts and therefore,preliminary
design of the BNSF bridge will include the preliminary design of the underpass "boat"
section also.
• No wetlands will be impacted.
• The new impervious area of the bridge will be less than 5,000 square feet and,therefore,
detention and water quality treatment will not be required. The bridge will be drained off
one end and into a nearby wetland. No stormwater design will be done for Task 200.
Task 200 Deliverable(s)
• Updated Base Map
• Preliminary Geotechnical Report
Scope of Work BergerABAM,FPPWT-09-253
Strander Boulevard Extension December 2009
City of Renton Exhibit A Page 6
■ "Boat Section" Alternatives Memorandum
■ Utility Relocation/Mitigation Memorandum
■ BNSF Concept Submittal
■ BNSF Structure T yp e Selection Report
■ BNSF 30 Percent Review Submittal
■ 30 Percent Plans
■ 30 Percent Cost Estimate
TASK 210 - PROJECT ADMINISTRATION
Task 211- Project Setup
Project files will be setup.
Task 212 - Invoicing and Progress Reports
Monthly invoices and progress reports will be prepared. It is assumed there will be 8 invoices
and progress reports.
Task 213 -Subconsultant Coordination
This task will include BergerABAM's time handling administrative and contract-related issues
with the subconsultants. Subconsultants for this task include Hanson Professional Services,
Shannon&Wilson, and Perteet.
Task 214 - Project Management and Administration
This task will include BergerABAM's time handling administrative and contract-related issues
with the City.
Task 215 - Meetings with City
It is assumed there will be 16 meetings in Renton and/or on site. Each meeting will be attended
by two Ber g er/ABAM staff members and one subconsultant staff member.
Task 216 - Quality Assurance and Control
All submittals to the City, including all subconsultant submittals,will be reviewed by the
BergerABAM project manager or project engineer. All changes from those reviews will be
incorporated prior to the submittal being sent to the City.
TASK 220 - PRELIMINARY STUDIES AND INVESTIGATIONS
Task 221- Railroad Right-of-Entries(ROE)
BergerABAM and subconsultant staff that have need to visit the site will need to attend railroad
safety training through www.contractororientation.com and e-railsafe, and acquire the
mandatory railroad right-of-entry certifications.
Task 222 -Survey
Topographic field survey will be completed for the potential north-south swaths where the
BNSF shooflies might be. Time will also be included in this task for on-call survey work to pick
Scope of Work BergerABAM,FPPWT-09-253
Strander Boulevard Extension December 2009
City of Renton Exhibit A Page 7
0 •
up other changes and new survey areas as needed by the team as the design progresses. This
task will include updating the existing base map and digital terrain model(DTM).
Provide up to three days of survey plus associated office support for subsurface utility
engineering (SUE) services (estimated at$10,000). Likely tasks include
• Calculation of proposed SUE sites(estimated at 10).
• Stake preliminary location for SUE investigation
• Survey and map horizontal and vertical location of utilities from SUE investigation.
Task 223 - Geotechnical
Several geotechnical reports for the Strander Boulevard Undercrossing project have been
completed since 2001, specifically: "Geology and Soils Discipline Report, Strander Boulevard
Extension, Renton and Tukwila,Washington," dated February 19,2004; "Geotechnical Report
for Conceptual Design, Strander Boulevard/Southwest 27th Street Improvements, Renton,
Washington," dated February 27, 2004; and "Geotechnical Report for 60 Percent Submittal,
Strander Boulevard Extension and Union Pacific Railroad(UPRR) Relocation,Renton,
Washington," dated September 21, 2007. Many borings were completed for preparation of
these reports. The number of borings completed is adequate for 30 percent design level for the
BNSF bridge,the underpass "boat" section at the BNSF bridge, and the shooflies for the BNSF
railroad track.
The proposed geotechnical scope of work is as follows.
• Review all of the existing geotechnical information and reports in and along the proposed
corridor
• Take monthly readings on all existing monitoring wells for the duration of Task 200
• Perform engineering studies to develop geotechnical design information and
recommendations for the following items
- Seismicity studies, ground motions for BNSF bridge design, and earthquake hazards
- Evaluation and comparison of feasible underpass excavation, temporary shoring, and
groundwater control
- Selection of the preferred alternative for the underpass structure
- Selection of the preferred permanent underpass wall
- Evaluation of base seal slab or concrete mat supported by tiedown anchors
- Lateral pressures for design of underpass wall
- Foundation support of proposed BNSF bridge
Scope of Work BergerABAM,FPPWT-09-253
Strander Boulevard Extension December 2009
City of Renton Exhibit A Page 8
- Foundation settlements and liquefaction induced ground settlements
- Design of BNSF shoofly embankments
- Design and construction of utilities
• Develop construction considerations
• Attend design meetings
TASK 230 - PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND DESIGN
Task 231- Underpass WaIVBNSF Bridge Foundation Alternatives
BergerABAM will develop and evaluate wall alternatives for the underpass, including the need
for and location of struts to support the walls. For this task,BergerABAM will use the
preliminary geotechnical report, as well as experience and cost data from the underpasses at
180th and in Yakima. Based on the results of this evaluation, BergerABAM may recommend
using a particular wall type or may recommend allowing for contractors to bid alternative wall
types if that appears it will obtain a better price without a loss of function.
Task 232 - Bottom Seal Alternatives
BergerABAM will develop and evaluate bottom seal alternatives for the underpass. For this
task,BergerABAM will use the preliminary geotechnical report, as well as experience and cost
data from the underpasses at 180th and in Yakima. Based on the results of this evaluation,
BergerABAM may recommend using a particular seal type or may recommend allowing for
contractors to bid alternative seal types if that appears it will obtain a better price without a loss
of function.
Task 233 - Utilities
One of the major efforts will be to determine what utilities are present within the project limits,
which of those utilities will be impacted, what are the feasible methods of mitigating those
impacts, what are the preferred mitigation measures,what are the estimated costs of those
mitigation measures, and who is responsible for those costs. BergerABAM will start by
reviewing all the utility data that has been collected to date. This data will be confirmed and
BergerABAM will research to find any data for new utilities or data that was missed in previous
research. BergerABAM will plot this data on the project plans for the BNSF bridge and the
BNSF shoofly. Based on this,BergerABAM will conduct further SUE Level A and/or B survey
to precisely locate utilities that may not be located accurately enough or that are borderline as to
whether they're impacted or not.
Once the utilities are accurately located and the impacts to them are known,BergerABAM will
coordinate mitigation of the impacts with the utility owners. In coordination with the owners,
potential mitigation solutions will be determined and evaluated. BergerABAM,in coordination
with the owners,will determine the preferred mitigation and will estimate the cost for that
Scope of Work BergerABAM,FPPWT-09-253
Strander Boulevard Extension December 2009
City of Renton Exhibit A Page 9
0
mitigation. BergerABAM will also coordinate with Renton,Tukwila, the railroads, and the
utility owners to determine which parties will be responsible for which mitigation costs.
Based on data available so far, the following utility impacts are anticipated.
• Bridge foundation excavation through AT&T and BNSF fiber optic lines
• BNSF shoofly crossing over the top of the 36-inch King County Metro sewer line
• BNSF shoofly crossing over the top of the Olympic Petroleum pipeline
• BNSF shoofly crossing over the top of the Seattle waterline
• BNSF shoofly crossing over PSE buried power lines
• BNSF shoofly crossing under PSE overhead power lines
Task 234 - Construction Staging
BergerABAM will prepare a staging plan that clearly shows how the trains will remain
operational while the bridge is built around and under them.
A critical issue that will be addressed during this task will be consideration of how any
potential shooflies will impact the Sounder Station and parking area. This effort will include
looking at how the station is planned around the future third and fourth BNSF tracks and
whether the third or fourth tracks might be used for shooflies. Lastly, this task will also address
shoofly and/or third and fourth track impacts to the access from Boeing at Longacres Way.
TASK 240 - PRELIMINARY BNSF DESIGN, COORDINATION,AND APPROVALS
Task 241- Develop Conceptual BNSF Plans
One of the most critical and likely most time-consuming decisions to be made will be to
determine where the BNSF full build-out tracks will be within their ROW. Right now,BNSF
has two tracks at the underpass location. However, BNSF has ROW for many more tracks. It is
certain that BNSF will have a third track soon and they may insist the underpass accommodate
a fourth or more track in the future.
The first step in determining the full build-out track horizontal and vertical alignments will be
to submit conceptual plans to BNSF. BergerABAM will assemble known information about the
existing tracks and plans for future tracks from BNSF, Renton, Tukwila, and the South 180th
Street underpass. With this information,BergerABAM will do preliminary design and
conceptual plans for the following.
• Horizontal and vertical alignment for the underpass
• Typical section of the underpass
• Typical section of the railroad bridge
• Shoofly horizontal alignments
Per BNSF guidelines, site photos and these conceptual plans will be turned into BNSF for a
four-week review. This task will also include a meeting with BNSF to discuss the results of
their review. For the purpose of this scope,it is assumed that the BNSF tracks will be
Scope of Work BergerABAM,FPPWT-09-253
Strander Boulevard Extension December 2009
City of Renton Exhibit A Page 10
0 •
configured the same at Strander as they are at 180th(three tracks with allowance in the
substructure for a fourth track, and no access road bridge). It is also assumed that all future
tracks will have the same elevations as the existing tracks.
Task 242 - BNSF Bridge Type,Size, and Location (TS&L)Report
Enough work has already been done to know that steel underdeck plate girders is the likely
preferred bridge type alternative. However, since the BNSF 30 percent submittal requires a
"Structure Type Selection Report," a brief report will be prepared documenting why this is the
preferred alternative. The report will focus on the construction cost savings for the project of
shallower girders and BNSF's preference for steel below deck girders over concrete below deck
girders and steel through plate girders. The disadvantages of long-term maintenance(painting
steel girders) will also be addressed. This task will also include the 30 percent design of the
substructure and superstructure for the preferred bridge alternative.
Task 243 - Preliminary Shoofly Design
BergerABAM will coordinate with BNSF to determine maximum train speeds at the anticipated
time of construction. Based on this and BNSF design standards,preliminary designs for the
shooflies will be done. It is assumed there will be two shoofly tracks for BNSF and that the
shooflies will be built west of the existing BNSF tracks. Typical shoofly sections will also be
developed, including dealing with soft native soils and protecting utilities beneath the shoofly.
A shoofly design for BNSF using a third and/or fourth BNSF track will also be investigated.
Task 244 - 30 Percent BNSF Review Submittal
Per BNSF guidelines, a 30 percent submittal will be turned in for a four-week review. The 30
percent submittal will include
• Responses to the conceptual submittal
• Underpass plan, profile, and typical section
• Preliminary geotechnical report
• Structure type selection report
• BNSF bridge plans,elevations, and sections
• BNSF track profiles at the bridges
• Wallibridge abutment plans, elevations, and sections
• Shoofly plans,profiles, and typical sections
• Underpass construction staging plans
• Fiber optic relocation plans and profiles
This task will also include a meeting with BNSF to discuss the results of their 30 percent review.
BNSF's 30 percent review comments will be incorporated into the final 30 percent submittal.
Task 245 - Preliminary Review of C&M Agreement
Before the bridge can be built, the City will need to sign a Construction and Maintenance
(C&M) agreement with BNSF. This is a complex legal document that also includes terms for the
easements the City will acquire for the use of BNSF's ROW for the undercrossing. BNSF will
Scope of Work BergerABAM,FPPWT-09-253
Strander Boulevard Extension December 2009
City of Renton Exhibit A Page 11
not start formally negotiating this agreement until closer to the time of bidding;however, it is
advisable for the City to start becoming familiar with the terms early in the project. This is
especially important for an underpass since underpasses impact BNSF's ROW more than an
overpass does,but BNSF still generally insists on maintaining the same rights as if it was an
overpass (i.e., rights to build utilities and tracks anywhere within the easement). For this task,
BergerABAM will obtain the current boilerplate agreement for BNSF. BergerABAM will also
pull the final South 180th C&M agreement from their files. Lastly,BergerABAM will collect all
their records of the C&M agreement negotiations for the BNSF underpasses for the City of
Yakima. This will be particularly useful for the City to see what Yakima attempted to change
and what changes BNSF did and did not accept. There are very pro-BNSF clauses in the
agreements that Yakima wanted to change but was unable to. The City may want to get a head
start in conducting risk assessments in case BNSF maintains the same positions on this project.
BergerABAM will conduct a review meeting of these various C&M versions with the City and
pass on all the collected materials for further internal City review.
TASK 250 - OTHER TASKS
Task 251 - Determine Additional ROW, Easement, and BNSF ROW Permit Needs
BergerABAM will plot out the project on the boundary survey to determine where additional
ROW and/or easements and/or BNSF ROW permits will be needed. The areas where additional
ROW and/or easements and/or BNSF ROW permits are anticipated are
• Defining he area of the underpass ROW permits through the BNSF ROW
g 1P P g
• Temporary construction easements for where the shoofly fill does not stay within the BNSF
ROW
• Temporary construction easements at one or more locations for contractor staging area(s)
and construction access
Task 252 - Coordinate with Environmental Studies and Permitting
BergerABAM will coordinate with the City's environmental consultant to be sure that what is
being designed is permittable. BergerABAM will provide design data as needed in support of
environmental clearance and permitting efforts.
TASK 260 - 30 PERCENT PLANS AND ESTIMATE
Task 261- 30 percent Plans
The following 30 percent 11 x 17 plans will be prepared.
• Title Sheet-1 sheet
• Underpass Plan and Profile-1 sheet
• Roadway Sections-1 sheet
• Wall/Abutment Plan, Elevation, and Details-3 sheets
• Bottom Seal Plan and Elevation-1 sheet
Scope of Work BergerABAM,FPPWT-09-253
Strander Boulevard Extension December 2009
City of Renton Exhibit A Page 12
0 0
• Fiber Optic Plan, Profiles, and Details-1 sheet
• Other Utility Mitigation Details -2 sheets
• BNSF Bridge Plan, Elevation,Section, and Details-2 sheets
• Shoofly Plans and Profiles-3 sheets
• Shoofly Sections-1 sheet
Task 262 - 30 Percent Cost Estimate
BergerABAM will prepare a cost estimate for Task 200. The cost estimate will include estimates
for the following in order to estimate the total cost related to Task 200.
• Preliminary engineering(through construction contract award)
• Environmental documentation and permitting
• Right-of-way acquisition
• Construction
- By Private Utilities
- By BNSF
- By Renton's Construction Contractor(s)
• Inflation
• Estimating contingencies
• Construction contingencies
es
• Agency administration
• Construction engineering
TASK 300 -SUPPORT THE CITY OF RENTON DURING FINAL BRIDGE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
BY BNSF
This task will be scoped once BNSF's scope of work for design and construction is determined.
TASK 400 - COMPLETE 30% DESIGN FOR THE BNSF UNDERPASS
Task 400 Assumptions
• The BNSF underpass will begin near the east edge of the UPRR ROW and end at the
existing western end of Southwest 27th Street. It will connect to the Sounder Station
parking lot at its west end.
• Task 400 will be completed four months after NTP.
• The plans, profiles, and sections from Tasks 100 and 200 will be the basis for all the
geometry for Task 400.
• The City of Renton will complete all the necessary environmental documents and permits
for the construction of the BNSF underpass. BergerABAM will supply information to the
City as needed to complete this work. No traffic studies will be needed to complete the
environmental documents and permits.
Scope of Work BergerABAM,FPPWT-09-253
Strander Boulevard Extension December 2009
City of Renton Exhibit A Page 13
0 i
• All of the existing survey is still accurate and no additional survey will be needed. If the
BNSF bridge and/or third track is built by this time, survey will need to be added by
supplement.
• No additional utilities will be impacted during this task.
• No wetlands will be impacted.
• The remainder of the underpass will be built as extensions east and west of the portion of
the underpass built beneath the BNSF bridge. Continuous use of the BNSF tracks will not
be impacted by this part of the construction except to build and flag a temporary crossing
for use by the contractor.
Task 400 Deliverable(s)
■ Stormwater Report
■ 30 Percent Plans
■ 30 Percent Cost Estimate
TASK 410 - PROJECT ADMINISTRATION
Task 411- Project Setup
Project files will be setup.
Task 412 - Invoicing and Progress Reports
Monthly invoices and progress reports will be prepared. It is assumed there will be four
invoices and progress reports.
Task 413 -Subconsultant Coordination
This task will include BergerABAM's time handling administrative and contract-related issues
with the subconsultants. Subconsultants for this task include Hanson Professional Services,
Shannon&Wilson, and Perteet. No specific tasks for these three subconsultants are included in
the scope,but it is envisioned they will be needed to provide assistance from time to time. Each
will be given a budget of$10,000 for this task.
Task 414 - Project Management and Administration
This task will include BergerABAM's time handling administrative and contract-related issues
with the City.
Task 415 - Meetings with City
It is assumed there will be eight meetings in Renton and/or on site. Each meeting will be
attended by two Berger/ABAM staff members and one subconsultant staff member.
Task 416 - Quality Assurance and Control
All submittals to the City, including all subconsultant submittals,will be reviewed by the
BergerABAM project manager or project engineer. All changes from those reviews will be
incorporated prior to the submittal being sent to the City.
Scope of Work BergerABAM,FPPWT-09-253
Strander Boulevard Extension December 2009
City of Renton Exhibit A Page 14
TASK 420 - PRELIMINARY STUDIES AND INVESTIGATIONS
Task 421- Railroad Right-of-Entries(ROE)
BergerABAM and subconsultant staff that have need to visit the site will need to attend railroad
safety training through www.contractororientation.com and e-railsafe, and acquire the
mandatory railroad right-of-entry certifications.
TASK 430 - PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND DESIGN
Task 431-Stormwater Report
Given the large amount of impervious surface that this project will add, a stormwater study and
design will be completed. The focus will be to do enough design so that stormwater costs can
be accurately estimated and so that the stormwater portion of the environmental document can
be completed. This will include all the storm drainage pipes and structures, the stormwater
pump station, and the stormwater quality and quantity control facilities. ROW costs for the
land for these facilities will also be considered.
The ffort will address drainage of the roadway and tributary areas as well as integrating the
e
g Y Y � g g
proposed improvements with existing drainage and treatment systems. The design and report
will be prepared per the criteria of the Washington State Department of Ecology Stormwater
Management Manual for Western Washington(2005) and the requirements of the cities of
Renton and Tukwila. Tasks will include
1. Collect and review available paper and electronic as-builts and construction record
drawings for existing stormwater facilities,including pipes, ditches, structures, and
other features
2. Collect available topographic information for complete basin delineations for
contributing runoff areas and produce a drainage map showing each contributing area
and the proposed path for stormwater runoff from the project area, at a scale no smaller
than 1"=200
3. Determine pipe and structure sizing
4. Design project detention and water quality facilities as follows
■ Determine available locations for new structures,pipes, and facilities
■ Calculate preliminary pipe sizes, slopes, vault and pond sizing, and configuration
■ Determine ditch and channel locations to convey off-site cut and fill slope runoff
■ Determine required improvements to downstream facilities as necessary to convey
flows
■ Determine water quality facilities and associated structures
5. Calculate quantities and estimate costs
6. Prepare stormwater report including
Scope of Work BergerABAM,FPPWT-09-253
Strander Boulevard Extension December 2009
City of Renton Exhibit A Page 15
■ Project overview
■ Detailed project description
■ Downstream and upstream analysis
■ Runoff/detention calculations
■ Water quality computations
■ Cost estimate
Task 432 - Construction Phasing and Staging
BergerABAM will design the BNSF underpass to minimize the cost of extending the underpass
beneath the UPRR in the future. This will include building the walls and bottom seal between
UPRR and BNSF deep enough to accommodate the final underpass profile for UPRR. It will
also require some type of end water seal to seal the west end of the"boat section' so the BNSF
underpass is watertight.
In addition,BergerABAM will design the north wall of the underpass to accommodate the
future addition of the ramp to the Sounder Station with minimal disruption to traffic within the
underpass.
Although this task will build the "boat section" for the completed BNSF and UPRR underpass
in between the two railroads,the profile for this task will deviate from the final profile so that
the roadway will come back up to near existing grade just east of the UPRR ROW. From there it
will tie into the Sounder Station parking lot.
TASK 440 - OTHER TASKS
Task 441- Determine Additional ROW and Easement Needs
BergerABAM will plot out the project on the boundary survey to determine where additional
ROW and/or easements will be needed. The areas where additional ROW and/or easements are
anticipated are
• Formal designation of the roadway ROW through the Sound Transit and Tukwila
properties between the tracks
• ROW somewhere (probably the Tukwila property between the tracks) for the pump station,
water quality and detention ponds, and wetland mitigation
• Temporary construction easements at one or more locations for contractor staging area(s)
and access along the outsides of the underpass
Task 442 - Coordinate with Environmental Studies and Permitting
BergerABAM will coordinate with the City's environmental consultant to be sure that what is
being designed is permittable. BergerABAM will provide design data as needed in support of
environmental clearance and permitting efforts.
Scope of Work BergerABAM,FPPWT-09-253
Strander Boulevard Extension December 2009
City of Renton Exhibit A Page 16
• •
Task 443 - Public Involvement
BergerABAM will gather any information available on previous public involvement activities
and will develop a public involvement plan for Task 400. It is assumed there will be one open
house/information session during this task.
Task 444 - Funding Assistance
BergerABAM will assist the City with identifying funding sources applicable to this project.
BergerABAM will assist the City in preparing grant applications and project summary reports
to apply for these funding opportunities. BergerABAM will research the requirements of
typical funding sources to be sure the project design conforms to those requirements.
TASK 450 -30 PERCENT PLANS AND ESTIMATE
Task 451 - 30 percent Plans
The following 30 percent 11 x 17 plans will be prepared.
• Title Sheet-1 sheet
• Underpass Plan and Profile-3 sheets
- These sheets will show curb, sidewalk, channelization, cut and fill lines,walls,bridges,
and approximate ROW takes and easements. Storm drainage.pipes and structures will
not be shown,but pump station,water quality, and detention facilities will be shown.
• Roadway Sections-1 sheet
• Wall Plan, Elevation, and Details-3 sheets
• Bottom Seal and End Seal Plan, Elevation, and Sections-1 sheet
• Storm Drainage and Pump Station Details-2 sheets
Task 452 - 30 Percent Cost Estimate
BergerABAM will prepare a project cost estimate for the total project and for the individual
phases. The project cost estimate will include estimates for the following in order to estimate
total project cost.
• Preliminary engineering(through construction contract award)
• Environmental documentation and permitting
• Right-of-way acquisition
• Construction
- By Private utilities
- By UPRR and BNSF
- By cities
- By City's construction contractor(s)
• Inflation
• Estimating contingencies
• Construction contingencies
• Agency administration
• Construction engineering
Scope of Work BergerABAM,FPPWT-09-253
Strander Boulevard Extension December 2009
City of Renton Exhibit A Page 17
0 0
TASK 500 - COMPLETE 30% DESIGN FOR THE UPRR UNDERPASS
Task 500 Assumptions
1. Task 500 will be completed 10 months after NTP.
2. The plans,profiles, and sections from Tasks 100, 200, and 400 will be the basis for all the
geometry for Task 500.
3. The City of Renton will complete all the necessary environmental documents and
permits for the construction of the BNSF underpass. Ber erABAM will supply
P P g PP Y
information to the City as needed to complete this work. No traffic studies will be
needed to complete the environmental documents and permits.
4. All of the existing survey is still accurate and the only additional survey needed for this
task will be for the potential north-south swaths where the UPRR shooflies might be and
for utility locations. However, extra hours will be included for additional survey as
needed and as directed during this task.
5. The "boat section' design for the BNSF underpass will also be used for the UPRR
underpass.
6. The UPRR underpass will have its own pump station and water quality/quantity ponds.
7. The BNSF underpass will be closed for construction of the UPRR underpass.
Task 500 Deliverable(s)
• Traffic Study
• Updated Base Map
• Geotechnical Engineering Report
• Utility Relocation Memoranda (one for each major utility)
• Stormwater Report
• Interurban Trail Memorandum
• Sounder Station Secondary Access Memorandum
• UPRR Concept Submittal
• UPRR Structure Type Selection Report
• UPRR 30 Percent Submittal
• 30 Percent Plans
• 30 Percent Cost Estimate
TASK 510 - PROJECT ADMINISTRATION
Task 511- Project Setup
Project files will be setup.
i
Scope of Work BergerABAM,FPPWT-09-253
Strander Boulevard Extension December 2009
City of Renton Exhibit A Page 18
• •
Task 512 - Invoicing and Progress Reports
Monthly invoices and progress reports will be prepared. It is assumed there will be 10 invoices
and progress reports.
Task 513 -Subconsultant Coordination
This task will include BergerABAM's time handling administrative and contract-related issues
with the subconsultants. Subconsultants for this task include Hanson Professional Services,
Shannon&Wilson, and Perteet.
Task 514 - Project Management and Administration
This task will include BergerABAM's time handling administrative and contract-related issues
with the City.
Task 515 - Meetings with City
It is assumed there will be 20 meetings in Renton and/or on site. Each meeting will be attended
by two Berger/ABAM staff members and one subconsultant staff member.
Task 516 - Quality Assurance and Control
All submittals to the City, including all subconsultant submittals, will be reviewed by the
BergerABAM project manager or project engineer. All changes from those reviews will be
incorporated prior to the submittal being sent to the City.
TASK 520 - PRELIMINARY STUDIES AND INVESTIGATIONS
Task 521-Traffic Studies
A traffic study will be prepared to design the intersection of Strander Boulevard and West
Valley Highway. For this study, it is assumed that Strander Boulevard will be a five-lane
roadway going under LTRR and BNSF and will connect to Southwest 27th Street just west of
Oakesdale Avenue SW(Segment 1). It is also assumed that Southwest 27th Street will not
connect to State Route (SR) 167. The future year analysis will be conducted for 2015 as the year
of opening, and 2035 as the design year.
This traffic study will only address the operations of vehicular traffic along Strander Boulevard
and will not address any transit,nonmotorized, or freight-related issues. These elements were
studied and documented in the Transportation Technical Discipline Report-Strander
Boulevard Extension Project,May 2004. Should there be the need to revisit either the transit,
freight, or nonmotorized elements, a detailed scope of services can be provided at that time.
Collect and review available data, including traffic volume and classification counts, traffic
forecasts, accident history, and signal and access control information from the City and/or
Tukwila and WSDOT. This task will also include a review of existing studies relevant to the
project such as the Project Definition Report, Transportation Technical Discipline Report(May
2004),Tukwila Transit Network Plan, Sound Transit Plans for the Sounder Commuter Rail
Station, and Renton Transit Plans.
Scope of Work BergerABAM,FPPWT-09-253
Strander Boulevard Extension December 2009
City of Renton Exhibit A Page 19
. 0
1. Collect 2008 PM peak hour turn movement counts and signal timing/phasing (or
SYNCHRO electronic files) for the following key study intersections.
• City of Renton
Southwest 27th Street at Oakesdale Avenue
Southwest 27th Street at Lind Avenue
Southwest 27th Street at East Valley Road
Grady Way at Lind Avenue
Grady Way at SR 167
Southwest 43rd Street at East Valley Road
• City of Tukwila
Strander Boulevard at West Valley Highway
Grady Way at West Valley Highway
South 180th Street at West Valley Highway
2. Collect 2008 ADT and vehicle classification counts at the following locations
■ City of Renton
Southwest 43rd Street between Lind Avenue and East Valley Road
Grady Way between West Valley Highway and Lind Avenue
Grady Way between Lind Avenue and SR 167
Oakesdale Avenue between Southwest 27th Street and Southwest 43rd Street
Lind Avenue between Southwest 27th Street and Southwest 43rd Street
East Valley Road between Southwest 27th Street and Southwest 43rd Street
Southwest 27th Street between East Valley Road and Lind Avenue
East Valley Highway between Southwest 43rd Street and South 184th Street(City of
Kent)
■ City of Tukwila
West Valley Highway between Strander Boulevard and Interstate 405 (I-405)
West Valley Highway between Strander Boulevard and South 180th Street
Strander Boulevard between Andover Park E and West Valley Hwy
3. Obtain and review copies of relevant reports and studies, including those described
above.
4. Prepare technical memorandum documenting 2008 traffic conditions.
Validate 2008 (base year) and develop 2015 (year of opening) and 2035 (design year)PM peak
hour traffic forecasts using the City of Renton's EMME model. Post-process 2015 and 2035
Scope of Work BergerABAM,FPPWT-09-253
Strander Boulevard Extension December 2009
City of Renton Exhibit A Page 20
traffic volume forecast data for use with SYNCHRO for analyzing study area intersection
operations.
1. Validate City of Renton's 2008 base year EMME traffic model to PM peak hour traffic
conditions in the study area.
2. Using City of Renton s 2015 EMME traffic model,forecast 2015 PM peak hour traffic
forecasts for a four-lane Strander Boulevard with and without Segment 1. Post-process
and balance 2015 PM peak hour forecasts to develop 2015 PM turning movement
forecasts with and without Segment 1 for the key study area intersections identified
above.
3. Using City of Renton s 2030 EMME traffic model,forecast 2030 PM peak hour traffic
forecasts for a five-lane Strander Boulevard with and without Segment 1. Post-process
and balance 2030 PM peak hour forecasts to develop 2030 PM turning movement
forecasts with and without Segment 1 for the key study area intersections identified
above. Extrapolate 2030 data to the 2035 design year.
4. Conduct up to three additional EMME model runs for Segment 1 to perform"what if"
analysis regarding any future possible connections and access to Strander Boulevard
from Boeing Longacres and the Sounder Station.
5. Prepare technical memorandum documenting the 2015 and 2030/2035 traffic forecasting
results and the post-processing methods.
Analyze 2015 (year of opening) and 2035 (design year) PM peak hour turning movement
forecasts using SYNCHRO.
1. Analyze 2015 and 2035 level of service and intersection operations for the PM peak hour
for a five-lane Strander Boulevard with and without Segment 1 at the following
intersections
Strander Boulevard at West Valle Highway
Y g Y
Strander Boulevard at Boeing Access Road
Strander Boulevard at Lind Avenue
Strander Boulevard at Oakesdale Avenue
Strander Boulevard at East Valley Road
Southwest 43rd St at East Valley Road
Grady Way at West Valley Highway
2. Conduct signal warrant analysis for the new Strander Boulevard intersections at Boeing
Access Road. Signal warrant analysis for any future connections to the Sounder Station
will also be conducted should there be a need to connect with Strander Boulevard
Scope of Work BergerABAM,FPPWT-09-253
Strander Boulevard Extension December 2009
City of Renton Exhibit A Page 21
0 •
3. Conduct traffic mitigation analysis and develop appropriate channelization as needed
for the above-listed intersections. Determine vehicle storage adequacy for turn lanes
and pocket lengths, and summarize vehicle queues at key study intersections. Of
particular interest to this study will be the intersection operations and channelization at
West Valley Highway and Oakesdale Avenue (i.e., the western and eastern terminus of
Segment 1).
4. Prepare technical memorandum documenting the traffic operations for year of opening
2015 and design year 2035 and the recommended mitigations needed to optimize
vehicular capacity and maximize throughput through Segment 1 of Strander Boulevard
Extension.
Prepare draft and final traffic study reports documenting the above analysis and recommended
mitigation to optimize corridor and intersection performance along Segment 1 of the Strander
Boulevard Extension.
1. Prepare draft and final traffic study report documenting existing and future conditions,
as well as the traffic mitigation/recommendations for Segment 1.
Task 522 - Railroad Right-of-Entries(ROE)
BergerABAM and subconsultant staff that have need to visit the site will need to attend railroad
safety training through www.contractororientation.com and e-railsafe, and acquire the
mandatory railroad right-of-entry certifications.
Task 523 -Survey
It is assumed most of the existing survey is still useable;however, there will be need for
additional survey during Task 500. BergerABAM will survey known items that have changed.
The north-south swaths where the UPRR shoofly will be located will also be surveyed. Time
will also be included in this task for on-call survey work to pick up other changes and new
survey areas as needed by the team as the design progresses. The majority of the project area
already has a base map developed and additional field survey sufficient to prepare the 30
percent UPRR underpass design is expected to be limited to the following.
1. Provide up to 10 days of supplemental survey,plus associated office support to update
base map and DTM. Likely tasks include
■ Recover and re-establish horizontal and vertical control
■ Survey and map changed conditions
■ Additional topographic survey and mapping for proposed shoofly
■ Pick-up survey and mapping as requested by design team
2. Provide up to five days of survey, plus associated office support for SUE services
(estimated at$15,000). Likely tasks include
■ Calculation of proposed SUE sites(estimated at 20)
Scope of Work BergerABAM,FPPWT-09-253
Strander Boulevard Extension December 2009
City of Renton Exhibit A Page 22
0 •
■ Stake preliminary location for SUE investigation
■ Survey and map horizontal and vertical location of utilities from SUE investigation
Task 524 - Geotechnical
BergerABAM will use all the current borings and reports in the area as a start for a new
geotechnical report intended specifically to bring the UPRR underpass design up to 30 percent
completion. Several geotechnical reports for the Strander Boulevard Undercrossing project
have been completed since 2001, specifically: "Geology and Soils Discipline Report, Strander
Boulevard Extension, Renton and Tukwila,Washington," dated February 19, 2004;
"Geotechnical Report for Conceptual Design,Strander Boulevard/Southwest 27th Street
Improvements, Renton,Washington," dated February 27, 2004;and "Geotechnical Report for 60
Percent Submittal, Strander Boulevard Extension and Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR)
Relocation, Renton, Washington," dated September 21,2007. Many borings were completed for
preparation of these reports;however,more borings are required between West Valley
Highway and the existing UPRR track, and along the proposed UPRR shoofly alignment.
The proposed geotechnical scope of work is as follows.
• Review all of the existing geotechnical information and reports in and along the proposed
corridor
• Drill two borings between the existing UPRR and West Valley Highway with an average
depth of 170 feet and four borings along the proposed shoofly alignment for the UPRR with
an average depth of 70 feet
• Perform laboratory tests to determine the index consolidation and strength properties of
selected soil samples from borings
• Take monthly readings on all existing monitoring wells for the duration of Task 500
• Perform engineering studies to develop geotechnical design information and
recommendations for the following items
• Seismicity studies, ground motions for railroad bridge design, and earthquake hazards
• Lateral pressures for design of underpass wall
• Foundation support of proposed UPRR bridge and trail bridge
• Foundation settlements and liquefaction-induced ground settlements
• Foundation support of signal foundations
• Design of UPRR shoofly embankments
• Design and construction of utilities
Scope of Work BergerABAM,FPPWT-09-253
Strander Boulevard Extension December 2009
City of Renton Exhibit A Page 23
• Pavement design
• Develop construction considerations
• Attend design meetings
TASK 530 - PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND DESIGN
Task 531 -Trail Alternatives
BergerABAM will look at options for maintaining the continuity of the Interurban Trail and for
maintaining access to the trail in the immediate vicinity of Strander. BergerABAM will develop
and evaluate the following alternatives for the trail.
1. The trail will be cut off at the nearest P ublic access points north and south of Strander
(assumed to be Longacres Way and South 180th,respectively) and tra it users will be
rerouted to the Green River Trail in between these two points.
2. The trail grade will be raised at Strander and a pedestrian bridge will be built for the
trail to cross over the underpass. The connection from Strander to the trail will not be
replaced.
3. The trail grade will be raised at Strander and a pedestrian bridge will be built for the
trail to cross over the underpass. The connection from Strander to the trail will be
replaced by a ramp on the north or south side connecting the trail to the Strander
sidewalk as was done at 180th.
4. The trail grade will be raised at Strander and a pedestrian bridge will be built for the
g P g
trail to cross over the underpass. The connection from Strander to the trail will be
replaced by a public pathway bought and constructed on land a short distance north
and/or south of the underpass.
Task 532 -Secondary Access to Sounder Station
BergerABAM will look at options for providing a secondary access to the Sound Transit
property between UPRR and BNSF tracks from West Valley Highway by way of an easement or
ROW purchase north of Strander Boulevard. It is assumed that this secondary access will be at-
grade across the UPRR tracks and that the current permit possessed by the City of Tukwila will
be used for this new at-grade crossing location.
Task 533 - Driveways
Revised driveways will be designed for access from Strander to Taco Bell and Jack-in-the-Box.
This task will also include any required modifications to the parking areas and drive-thrus for
the two restaurants.
Task 534 -Traffic Signals
Based on the results from the traffic analysis of the West Valley/Strander intersection,
BergerABAM will prepare a preliminary design of the modifications to the signal at that
Scope of Work BergerABAM,FPPWT-09-253
Strander Boulevard Extension December 2009
City of Renton Exhibit A Page 24
0
intersection. This work will focus on identifying the anticipated cost of the signal modifications,
and if any additional ROW will be necessary. The preliminary design will therefore focus on
identifying preferred pole locations and configurations, as well as whether the existing
controller and cabinet can be utilized in its existing location, or whether a new location will be
necessary. For the preliminary design, consideration will be given as to how to minimize
impacts to traffic on the existing legs of the West Valley/Strander intersection during the signal
reconstruction. An example would be that it may have less impact to traffic to rewire the
intersection to a new controller cabinet than to the existing cabinet if significant changes are
necessary to the existing system.
Task 535 - Utilities
One of the major efforts will be to determine what utilities are present within the project limits,
which of those utilities will be impacted, what are the feasible methods of mitigating those
impacts,what are the preferred mitigation measures, what are the estimated costs of those
mitigation measures, and who is responsible for those costs. BergerABAM will start by
reviewing all the utility data that has been collected to date. This data will be confirmed and
BergerABAM will research to find any data for new utilities or data that was missed in previous
research. BergerABAM will plot this data on the project plans for the underpass and the
shoofly. Based on this,BergerABAM will conduct further SUE Level A and/or B survey to
precisely locate utilities that may not be located accurately enough or that are borderline as to
whether they're impacted or not.
Once the utilities are accurately located and the impacts to them are known,BergerABAM will
coordinate mitigation of the impacts with the utility owners. In coordination with the owners,
potential mitigation solutions will be determined and evaluated. BergerABAM, in coordination
with the owners, will determine the preferred mitigation and will estimate the cost for that
mitigation. BergerABAM will also coordinate with Renton,Tukwila,the railroads, and the
utility owners to determine which parties will be responsible for which mitigation costs.
Based on data available so far, the following utility impacts are anticipated.
• Underpass excavation through multiple fiber optic lines
• Underpass excavation though 36-inch King County Metro sewer line
• Underpass excavation through Puget Sound Energy (PSE)buried power lines
• Underpass excavation through the Olympic Petroleum pipeline
• Possible excavation through PSE buried gas line
• Underpass passing under PSE overhead power lines
• Shoofly crossing over the top of the 36-inch King County Metro sewer line
• Shoofly crossing over the top of the Olympic Petroleum pipeline
• Shoofly crossing over the top of Seattle waterline
• Shoofly crossing over PSE buried power lines
BergerABAM will also coordinate with at least Renton and Tukwila to determine if there is a
need or desire to include new utilities within the new Strander ROW. If new utilities are
Scope of Work BergerABAM,FPPWT-09-253
Strander Boulevard Extension December 2009
City of Renton Exhibit A Page 25
0 0
desired,BergerABAM will evaluate the feasibility and costs for adding them to the project. Due
to the difficulty of installing utilities within the bottom seal,it is anticipated that new buried
utilities will be installed within the ROW,but outside of the underpass walls. They will also
need to be bored under the railroad tracks.
Task 536 -Stormwater Report
Given the large amount of impervious surface that this project will add, a stormwater study and
design will be completed. The focus will be to do enough design so that stormwater costs can
be accurately estimated and so that the stormwater portion of the environmental document can
be completed. This will include all the storm drainage pipes and structures, the stormwater
pump station, and the stormwater quality and quantity control facilities. ROW costs for the
land for these facilities will also be considered.
The effort will address drainage of the roadway and tributary areas, as well as integrating the
proposed improvements with existing drainage and treatment systems. The design and report
will be prepared per the criteria of the Washington State Department of Ecology Stormwater
Management Manual for Western Washington(2005) and the requirements of the cities of
Renton and Tukwila. Tasks will include
1. Collect and review available paper and electronic as-builts and construction record
drawings for existing stormwater facilities, including pipes, ditches, structures, and
other features
2. Collect available topographic information for complete basin delineations for
contributing runoff areas and produce a drainage map showing each contributing area
and the proposed path for stormwater runoff from the project area, at a scale no smaller
than 1"=200
3. Determine pipe and structure sizing
4. Design project detention and water quality facilities as follows
■ Determine available locations for new structures,pipes, and facilities
■ Calculate preliminary pipe sizes, slopes, vault and pond sizing, and configuration
■ Determine ditch and channel locations to convey off-site cut and fill slope runoff.
■ Determine required improvements to downstream facilities as necessary to convey
flows
■ Determine water quality facilities and associated structures
5. Calculate quantities and estimate costs
6. Prepare stormwater report including
■ Project overview
■ Detailed project description
Scope of Work BergerABAM,FPPWT-09-253
Strander Boulevard Extension December 2009
City of Renton Exhibit A Page 26
0
■ Downstream and upstream analysis
■ Runoff/detention calculations
■ Water quality computations
■ Cost estimate
Task 537 - Construction Staging
Because the UPRR track has to be kept in continuous operation,BergerABAM will prepare a
staging plan that clearly shows how the trains will remain operational while the underpass is
built around and under them. A critical issue that will be addressed during this task will be
consideration of how any potential shoofly will impact the Sounder Station and parking area.
Lastly, this task will also address shoofly impacts to the Sounder station access at Longacres
Way.
TASK 540 - PRELIMINARY UPRR DESIGN, COORDINATION,AND APPROVALS
Task 541 - Develop Conceptual UPRR Plans
One of the most critical and likely most time-consuming decisions to be made will be to
determine where the UPRR full build-out tracks will be within their ROW. Right now, the
UPRR has one track at the underpass location;however, they have ROW for many more tracks
and they could require accommodations for one or more additional tracks.
The first step in determining the full build-out track horizontal and vertical alignments will be
to submit conceptual plans to UPRR. BergerABAM will assemble known information about the
existing track and any plans for future tracks from the UPRR, Renton,Tukwila, and the South
180th Street underpass. With this information, BergerABAM will do preliminary design and
conceptual plans for the following.
• Horizontal and vertical alignment for the underpass
• Typical section of the underpass
• Typical sections of the UPRR bridge
• Shoofly horizontal alignment
Per UPRR guidelines, site photos and these conceptual plans will be turned into UPRR for a
four-week review. This task will also include a meeting with UPRR to discuss the results of
their review. For the purpose of this scope,it is assumed that the UPRR track will be configured
the same at Strander as it is at 180th(one track for UPRR and no access road bridge). It is also
assumed that any future tracks will have the same elevations as the existing track.
Task 542 - UPRR Bridge Type,Size, and Location Report(TS&L)
Enough work has already been done to know that steel underdeck plate girders is the likely
preferred bridge type alternative. However,since the UPRR 30 percent submittal requires a
"Structure Type Selection Report," a brief report will be prepared documenting why this is the
preferred alternative. The report will focus on the construction cost savings for the project of
shallower girders and UPWs preference for steel below deck girders over concrete below deck
girders and steel through plate girders. The disadvantages of long-term maintenance(painting
Scope of Work BergerABAM,FPPWT-09-253
Strander Boulevard Extension December 2009
City of Renton Exhibit A Page 27
0 s
steel girders) will also be addressed. This task will also include the 30 percent design of the
substructure and superstructure for the preferred bridge alternatives for both railroads.
Task 543 - Preliminary Shoofly Design
BergerABAM will coordinate with UPRR to determine maximum train speeds at the anticipated
time of construction. Based on this and UPRR design standards,preliminary designs for the
shoofly will be done. It is assumed there will be one shoofly track for UPRR and the shoofly
will be built east of the existing UPRR track. Typical shoofly sections will also be developed,
including dealing with soft native soils and protecting utilities beneath the shoofly.
A shoofly design using a third and/or fourth BNSF track from South 180th to north of I-405 will
also be investigated.
Task 544 - 30 Percent UPRR Review Submittal
Per UPRR guidelines, a 30 percent submittal will be turned into UPRR for a four-week review.
The 30 percent submittal will include:
• Responses to the conceptual submittal
• Underpass plan, profile, and typical section
• Preliminary geotechnical report
• Structure type selection report
• UPRR bridge plans, elevations, and sections
• UPRR track profiles at the bridges
• Wall/bridge abutment plans,elevations, and sections
• Shoofly plans, profiles, and typical sections
• Underpass construction staging plans
• Fiber optic relocation plans and profiles
This task will also include a meeting with UPRR to discuss the results of their 30 percent
review. UPRR's 30 percent review comments will be incorporated into the final 30 percent
submittal to the City,but will not be resubmitted to UPRR until the 60 percent submittal in a
later design phase. This is per UPRR guidelines. For the purpose of this scope, it is assumed
that the UPRR track will be configured the same at Strander it is at 180th(one track for UPRR
and no access road bridge). It is also assumed that any future tracks will have the same
elevations as the existing track.
Task 545 - Preliminary Review of C&M Agreement
Before the underpass can be built,the City will need to sign a C&M agreement with UPRR.
This is a complex legal document that also includes terms for the easements the City will
acquire for the use of UPRR's ROW for the undercrossing. UPRR will not start formally
negotiating this agreement until closer to the time of bidding;however,it is advisable for the
City to start becoming familiar with the terms early in the project. This is especially important
for an underpass since an underpass impacts UPRR's ROW more than an overpass does,but the
railroads still generally insist on maintaining the same rights as if it was an overpass(i.e.,rights
to build utilities and tracks anywhere within the easement). For this task,BergerABAM will
Scope of Work BergerABAM,FPPWT-09-253
Strander Boulevard Extension December 2009
City of Renton Exhibit A Page 28
obtain the current boilerplate agreement for UPRR. BergerABAM will also pull the final South
180th UPRR C&M agreement from their files. Lastly,BergerABAM will collect all their records
of the C&M agreement negotiations for the BNSF underpass for the City of Yakima. This will
be particularly useful for the City to see what Yakima attempted to change and what changes
BNSF did and did not accept. There are very pro-UPRR clauses in the agreements that Yakima
wanted to change but was unable to. The City may want to get a head start in conducting risk
assessments in case UPRR holds a similar position on this project. BergerABAM will conduct a
review meeting of these various C&M versions with the City and pass on all the collected
materials for further internal City review.
TASK 550 - OTHER TASKS
Task 551- Determine Additional ROW, Easement, and UPRR ROW Permit Needs
BergerABAM will plot out the project on the boundary survey to determine where additional
ROW and/or easements and/or UPRR ROW permits will be needed. The areas where additional
ROW and/or easements and/or UPRR ROW permits are anticipated are
• Widening of the Strander ROW west of the UPRR ROW
• Defining the area of the underpass ROW permits through the UPRR ROW
• Obtaining a transfer of the at-grade UPRR crossing permit from Strander to a location north
of Strander where a secondary access to the Sounder station will be provided
• ROW or easement from West Valley Highway to UPRR property for the secondary access to
the Sounder station
• Temporary construction easements for where the shoofly fill does not stay within the UPRR
ROW
• ROW somewhere (probably the Tukwila property between the tracks) for the pump station,
water quality and detention ponds, and wetland mitigation
• Temporary construction easements at one or more locations for contractor staging area(s)
and access along the outsides of the underpass
Task 552 - Coordinate with Environmental Studies and Permitting
BergerABAM will coordinate with the City's environmental consultant to be sure that what is
being designed is permittable. BergerABAM will provide design data as needed in support of
environmental clearance and permitting efforts.
Task 553 - Public Involvement
BergerABAM will gather any information available on previous public involvement activities
and will develop a public involvement plan for this task. It is assumed there will be one open
house/information session during this task.
Scope of Work BergerABAM,FPPWT-09-253
Strander Boulevard Extension December 2009
City of Renton Exhibit A Page 29
Task 554 - Funding Assistance
BergerABAM will assist the City with identifying funding sources applicable to this project.
BergerABAM will assist the City in preparing grant applications and project summary reports
to apply for these funding opportunities. BergerABAM will research the requirements of
typical funding sources to be sure the project design conforms to those requirements.
TASK 560 -30 PERCENT PLANS AND ESTIMATE
Task 561- 30 percent Plans
The following 30 percent 11 x 17 plans will be prepared.
• Title Sheet-1 sheet
• Underpass Plan and Profile-3 sheets
- These sheets will show curb, sidewalk, channelization,cut and fill lines, walls,bridges,
and approximate ROW takes and easements. Storm drainage pipes and structures will
not be shown,but pump station, water quality, and detention facilities will be shown.
• Roadway Sections-1 sheet
• Sounder Station Secondary Access Plan and Details-2 sheets
• Driveway Plans,Profiles, and Details-2 sheets
• Intersection and Signal Plan-1 sheet
• Utility Plans,Profiles, and Details-5 sheets
• Storm Drainage and Pump Station Details-2 sheets
• Wetland Mitigation Plan-2 sheets
• Shoofly Plan and Profile-3 sheets
• Shoofly Sections-1 sheet
• Wall Plan, Elevation, and Details-3 sheets
• Bottom Seal Plan, Elevation, and Sections-1 sheet
• UPRR Bridge Plan, Elevation,Section, and Details-2 sheets
• Trail and Trail Bridge Plan, Elevation, Sections, and Details-2 sheets
• Construction Staging-2 sheets
Task 562 - 30 Percent Cost Estimate
BergerABAM will prepare a project cost estimate for the total project and for the individual
phases. The project cost estimate will include estimates for the following in order to estimate
total project cost.
• Preliminary engineering (through construction contract award)
• Environmental documentation and permitting
• Right-of-way acquisition
• Construction
- By Private utilities
- By UPRR and BNSF
- By cities
- By City's construction contractor(s)
• Inflation
Scope of Work BergerABAM,FPPWT-09-253
Strander Boulevard Extension December 2009
City of Renton Exhibit A Page 30
• Estimating contingencies
• Construction contingencies
• Agency administration
• Construction engineering
TASK 600 - COMPLETE 30% DESIGN OF THE CONNECTION FROM THE UNDERPASS TO THE
SOUNDER STATION
This task will be scoped once further details of the final Sounder station are known.
TASK 700 -ASSESS THE FEASIBILITY AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH AT-GRADE CONNECTIONS
TO THE SOUNDER STATION.
Task 700 Assumptions
• Task 700 will be completed seven months after NTP as outlined below. Durations and
timelines for these tasks will be finalized between the City of Renton and BergerABAM
prior to commencing work.
• Develop final agreements with subconsultants for this primary task. This task will be
completed within one month after NTP
• Subtask 730 Draft Design Memorandum will be completed within three months after
-- finalizing agreements with subconsultants.
• Renton will select the preferred alternative within 1 month after receipt of the Subtask 730
Draft Design Memorandum.
• Task 750 35 percent PS&E will be completed within two months after selection of the
preferred alternative and concurrence with the design memorandum by the City of Renton
• No traffic studies, additional geotechnical investigation or testing work, or subsurface utility
investigations will be done for this task. While not anticipated,it is possible that further
studies in these disciplines in later tasks could change the plan,profile, and/or sections
developed in this task.
• All of the existing survey is still accurate. New survey is required to extend the base map
from the northern limits of the existing survey to Southwest 16th Street and for the new
western terminus of Southwest 27th Street.
• A maximum of four title reports will be required to define ROW ownership along the
project.
• Coordination and approvals to use the pedestrian undercrossing through the BNSF ROW
have been secured by others from BNSF and other affected parties.
• Approval of these plans,profiles, and sections by the City of Renton will be required to
proceed to Task 200. It will be up to the City of Renton to determine if they desire or require
Scope of Work BergerABAM,FPPWT-09-253
Strander Boulevard Extension December 2009
City of Renton Exhibit A Page 31
• 0
getting approval from Tukwila, the Washington State Department of Transportation
(WSDOT),UPRR, BNSF, and Sound Transit for the preliminary plans,profiles, and sections.
Task 700 Deliverable(s)
■ Updated base map
■ Draft at-grade project configuration memorandum that discusses each of the four at-grade
alternatives. This memorandum will include project cost estimates and plans for each of the
four alternatives. This memorandum will discuss the pros and cons of each configuration.
This report will be submitted to the City or Renton for discussion and comment. The City of
Renton will offer comments on the memorandum and will select the preferred at-grade
configuration.
■ Final at-grade project configuration memorandum that discusses each of the four at-grade
alternatives. Appropriate comments on the draft memorandum will be incorporated. This
memorandum will include updated project cost estimates and plans for each of the four
alternatives. This memorandum will document the preferred at-grade configuration. This
report will be submitted to the City or Renton for concurrence/approval.
■ 35 percent plans, specifications, and estimate for the selected alternative.
TASK 710 - PROJECT ADMINISTRATION
Task 711- Project Setup
Project files will be setup and a subconsultant agreement will be prepared with Hanson,
Shannon&Wilson, and Perteet for Task 700.
Task 712 - Invoicing and Progress Reports
Monthly invoices and progress reports will be prepared. It is assumed there will be six invoices
and progress reports.
Task 713 -Subconsultant Coordination
This task will include BergerABAM's time handling administrative and contract-related issues
with the subconsultants. Subconsultants for this task include Hanson Professional Services Inc.
-Railroad Engineering;Shannon&Wilson, Inc.-Geotechnical Engineering;and Perteet, Inc.-
Traffic,Surveying, and Signals/Illumination. Subconsultants for Task 700 include Hanson,
Shannon&Wilson, and Perteet.
Task 714 - Project Management and Administration
This task will include BergerABAM's time handling administrative and contract-related issues
with the City.
Task 715 - Meetings with City
It is assumed there will be six meetings in Renton and/or on site. Each meeting will be attended
by two BergerABAM staff members and one subconsultant staff member.
Scope of Work BergerABAM,FPPWT-09-253
Strander Boulevard Extension December 2009
City of Renton Exhibit A Page 32
0 •
Task 716 - Quality Assurance and Control
All submittals to the City, including all subconsultant submittals,will be reviewed by the
BergerABAM project manager or project engineer. All changes from those reviews will be
incorporated prior to the submittal being sent to the City.
TASK 720 - PRELIMINARY STUDIES AND INVESTIGATIONS
Task 721- Railroad Right-of-Entries(ROE)
BergerABAM and subconsultant staff that have need to visit the site will need to attend railroad
safety training through www.contractororientation.com and e-railsafe, and acquire the
mandatory railroad right-of-entry certifications.
Task 722 -Survey
Topographic field survey will be completed for the new western terminus of Southwest 27th
Street where the new Strander alignment will tie in and for the N-S corridor along the BNSF
ROW to Southwest 16th Street by Perteet. This task will include recovering and reestablishing
horizontal and vertical control and updating the existing base map and digital terrain model
(DTM). This task will also include plotting existing utility and ROW boundaries determined
from existing records on base maps and title reports. ROW and utility surveys are not included.
Effort and fee for Perteet to perform this survey have been estimated by BergerABAM. This fee
will be confirmed with Perteet following receipt of an NTP from the City for this primary task.
Additions to the fee, if any, will be authorized from the management reserve or by an
additional supplement.
TASK 730 - PRELIMINARY PLANS, PROFILES,AND SECTIONS
Task 731- Design Parameters
BergerABAM will research City,railroad,WSDOT, and other pertinent standards and establish
the design parameters for the total project.
Task 732 - Determine Horizontal and Vertical Alignment
BergerABAM will determine the horizontal and vertical alignments of the at-grade connections
based on the design parameters established in the previous subtask.
Task 733 - Coordinate Access through BNSF ROW with BNSF
BergerABAM and Hanson will coordinate the feasibility of pedestrian and vehicle access
through the BNSF ROW along Longacres Way with BNSF. It is assumed that coordination and
approvals to use the pedestrian undercrossing through the BNSF ROW have been secured by
others. Effort and fee for Hanson to support this coordination effort have been estimated by
BergerABAM. This fee will be confirmed with Hanson following receipt of an NTP from the
City for this primary task. Additions to the fee, if any,will be authorized from the management
reserve or by an additional supplement.
Task 734 - Develop Geotechnical Design Memorandum
BergerABAM and Shannon&Wilson will develop a geotechnical design memorandum for the
design and construction of the at-grade connections to the Sounder Station. This memorandum
Scope of Work BergerABAM,FPPWT-09-253
Strander Boulevard Extension December 2009
City of Renton Exhibit A Page 33
will be based upon existing geotechnical information. Effort and fee for Shannon&Wilson to
develop this geotechnical design memorandum have been estimated by BergerABAM. This fee
will be confirmed with Perteet following receipt of an NTP from the City for this primary task.
Additions to the fee, if any, will be authorized from the management reserve or by an
additional supplement.
Task 735 - Develop At-Grade Alternative Drainage and Water Quality Preliminary Designs
BergerABAM will develop drainage and water quality preliminary designs for each at-grade
alternative.
Task 736 - Develop t-Grade Alternative Maintenance and Protection of Utility Preliminary
p tY Y
Designs
BergerABAM will develop plans for maintaining,protecting, and/or reconstructing affected
utilities for each for each at-grade alternative.
Task 737 - Roadway Sections
The purpose of this task will be to set the roadway cross sections and channelization for each at-
grade alternative. BergerABAM will determine all the plan view dimensions from back of
sidewalk to back of sidewalk for each at-grade alternative. Decisions that will affect these
roadway sections include
• Width of through lanes
• Width of bike lanes, if any
• Width and placement of sidewalks and/or combined sidewalkibike path
• Width and placement of landscape strips/medians, if any
• Dimensions of parking lot/number of parking spaces
• Dimensions of linear parking areas parallel to the NS roadway
• Access to linear parking areas
• Width and length of turn lanes and tapers at the intersections
• Location of existing ROW, easement, and property lines
Task 738 - Prepare Preliminary Drawings.
BergerABAM will prepare roll plots of the plan and profile for each alternative,which will be
used to discuss and evaluate the merits of each alternative with the City. The drawings will be
prepared at a 1:20 horizontal scale and a 1:5 vertical scale. The roll plot will also show proposed
parking areas to aid in determining a preliminary overall cost for the alternative.
Task 739 - Prepare Project Cost Estimates for At-Grade Alternatives
BergerABAM will use the results of the previous tasks to prepare preliminary project quantity
and cost estimates.
Task 740 - Prepare Draft and Final Design Memorandum including Preliminary Project Cost
Estimates and Drawings.
BergerABAM will use the results of the previous tasks to prepare the draft and final at-grade
Sounder connection design memorandum including preliminary project cost estimates,
preliminary plans,profiles, and sections for each alternative.
Scope of Work BergerABAM,FPPWT-09-253
Strander Boulevard Extension December 2009
City of Renton Exhibit A Page 34
i •
Task 741- City of Renton Comment/Approval
BergerABAM will submit the draft and final at-grade Sounder connection design memorandum
to the City of Renton for comment, selection of the preferred configuration, and
concurrence/approval.
TASK 750 - DEVELOP 35 PERCENT PS&E FOR SELECTED ALTERNATIVE
35 percent PS&E will be developed for the selected alternative. For scoping this subtask, it is
assumed that Alternative B will be the selected alternative.
TASK 800 - DEVELOP FINAL PS&E FOR SELECTED AT-GRADE ALTERNATIVE
This task will be scoped once Task 700 has been completed or is nearing completion.
Scope of Work BergerABAM,FPPWT-09-253
Strander Boulevard Extension December 2009
City of Renton Exhibit A Page 35
r i
:Exhibit:D=3
Payment (Negotiated Hourly-Rate)
The CONSULTANT shall be paid by the AGENCY for completed work and services rendered under this
AGREEMENT as provided hereinafter. Such payment shall be full compensation for work performed or
services rendered and for all labor,materials, supplies, equipment, and incidentals necessary to complete the
work, The CONSULTANT shall conform to all applicable portions of 48 CFR Part 31.
1.�IioQurly Rates: The CONSULTANT shall be paid by the AGENCY for work done,based u he
negotiated- ourly rates shown in Exhibit"E" and "F"attached hereto and by th' rence made
part of this AG T. The rates listed shall be applicable foi•th a welve(12)month
period and shall be aeriod upon request
of the CONSULTS S E E ATTAC H E D S H E ET the second or-
subsequent twelve _____ ,__��,_,,,�_.�______________ �. _----- r___- _i of the previous
period,the rates listed in tl ' REEMENT, or subsequent wri�ter�'���th�orization(s)from the
AGENCY shall > ized. The rates are inclusive of direct salaries,payroll'a ives, overhead,
and f e CONSULTANT shall maintain support data to verify the hours billed on
GREEMENT.
2. Direct Non-Salary Costs: Direct Non-Salary Costs will be reimbursed at the Actual Cost to the
CONSULTANT. These charges may include,but are not limited to,the following items: travel,
printing,long distance telephone,supplies,.computes-charges and sub-consultant costs.
a. Air or train travel will be reimbursed only to economy class levels unless
otherwise approved by the AGENCY. The CONSULTANT shall comply with
the rules and regulations regarding travel costs(excluding air,train,and rental
car costs) in accordance with the AGENCY'S Travel Rules and Procedures.
However, air,train, and rental car costs shall be reimbursed in accordance with
48 CFR Part 31.205-46"Travel Costs."
b. The billing for Direct Non-Salary Costs shall include an itemized listing of
the charges directly identifiable with the PROJECT.
c. The CONSULTANT shall maintain the original supporting documents in their
office. Copies of the original supporting documents shall be supplied to the
AGENCY upon request.
d. All above charges must be necessary for the services provided under this
AGREEMENT.
3. Management Reserve Fund: The AGENCY may desire to establish a Management Reserve Fund to
provide the Agreement Administrator with the flexibility to authorize additional funds to the
AGREEMENT for allowable unforeseen costs, or-reimbursing the CONSULTANT for additional
work beyond that already defined in this AGREEMENT. Such authorization(s) shall be in writing
and shall not exceed the lesser of$100,000 or 10% of the Total Amount Authorized as shown in the
heading of this AGREEMENT. The amount included for the Management Reserve Fund is shown
in the heading of this AGREEMENT.This fund may not be replenished. Any changes requiring
additional costs in excess of the Management Reserve Fund shall be made in accordance with
Section XN_ "Extra Work.''
DOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit D-3
Revised 3/09
4. Maximum Total Amount Payable: The Maximum Total Amount Payable by the AGENCY to the
CONSULTANT under this AGREEMENT shall not exceed the amount shown in the heading of
this AGREEMENT. The Maximum Total Amount Payable is comprised of the Total Amount
Authorized, and the Management Reserve Fund. The Maximum Total Amount Payable does not
include payment for Extra Work as stipulated in Section XIV, "Extra Work."No minimum
amount payable is guaranteed under this AGREEMENT.
5. Monthly Progress Payments: Progress payments may be claimed on a monthly basis for all costs
authorized in 1 and 2 above. The monthly billing shall be supported by detailed statements for
hours expended at the rates established in Exhibit"E", including names and classifications of all
.employees, and billings for all direct non-salary expenses. To provide a means of verifying the
billed salary costs for the CONSULTANT'S employees,the AGENCY may conduct employee
interviews. These interviews may consist of recording the names,titles, salary rates, and present
duties of those employees performing work on the PROJECT at the time of the interview.
6. Final Payment: Final Payment of any balance due the CONSULTANT of the gross amount earned
will be made promptly upon its verification by the AGENCY after the completion of the work
under this AGREEMENT, contingent upon receipt of all PS&E,plans, maps,notes,reports,
electronic data and other related documents which are required to be furnished under this
AGREEMENT. Acceptance of such Final Payment by the CONSULTANT shall constitute a
release of all claims for payment,which the CONSULTANT may have against the AGENCY
unless such claims are specifically reserved in writing and transmitted to the AGENCY by the
CONSULTANT prior to its acceptance. Said Final Payment shall not,however, be a bar to any
claims that the AGENCY may have against the CONSULTANT or to any remedies the AGENCY
may pursue with respect to such claims.
The payment of any billing will not constitute agreement as to the appropriateness of any item and
at the time of final audit, all required adjustments will be made and reflected in a final payment. In
the event that such final audit reveals an overpayment to the CONSULTANT.,the
CONSULTANT will refund such overpayment to the AGENCY within thirty (30) days of notice
of the overpayment. Such refund shall not constitute a waiver by the CONSULTANT for any
claims relating to the validity of a finding by the AGENCY of overpayment. The CONSULTANT
has twenty(20) days after receipt of the final POST AUDIT to begin the appeal process to the
AGENCY for audit findings.
7. Inspection of Cost Records: The CONSULTANT and their sub-consultants shall keep available for
inspection by representatives of the AGENCY, STATE and the United States,for a period of three
(3)years after receipt of final payment,the cost records and accounts pertaining to this
AGREEMENT and all items related to or bearing upon these records with the following
exception: if any litigation, claim or audit arising out of, in connection with, or related to this
contract is initiated before the expiration of the three(3)year period,the cost records and accounts
shall be retained until such litigation, claim, or audit involving the records is completed.
Revise paragraph 1, Hourly Rates, of Exhibit D-3 to read as follows.
1. Hourly Rates: The CONSULTANT shall be paid by the AGENCY for work done based upon the
hourly rates determined by a person's direct salary cost times the multipliers for overhead and
fixed fee shown in the table below. These multipliers shall be in effect until 31 October 2011.
After that date,these multipliers may be renegotiated at the request of the AGENCY or the
CONSULTANT. These hourly rates, therefore, will increase as the person's salary increases
during the duration of the project. The CONSULTANTS' direct salary costs are adjusted annually.
BergerABAM adjusts salary costs 1 July of each year. Periodically, direct salary costs are also
adjusted at mid-year for exceptional performance or a promotion based upon events such as a
person acquiring his/her professional license. Rates shown in Exhibits E-2 and G-2 are blended
hourly rates used to determine the fee for this scope of work; billed rates will be based upon
actual staff and actual staff direct salary costs used on the project at the above multiplier. The
rates are inclusive of direct salaries, payroll additives, overhead, and fee. The CONSULTANT
shall maintain support data to verify the hours billed on the AGREEMENT.
CONSULTANT DIRECT SALARY COST MULTIPLIER
BergerABAM 2.900
Hanson Professional Services 3.022
Perteet 3.025
Shannon &Wilson 3.272
Exhibit'E 2
Consultant Fee Determination -.Summary Sheet
(Specific.Rates of Pay)
Fee Schedule
Discipline or Job Title Hourly Overhead Profit Rate
Rate @ % @ % Per Hour
SEE D-3 FOR HOURLY RATES
DOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit E-2
Revised 6105
EXHIBIT E-2: PROJECT FESETERMINATION • 12/24/2009
BergerABAM
TASK SUBTOTALS
Task 100 - Define Final Strander Undercrossing Project Configuration $ 113,000
Task 200 - Define BNSF Bridge at Strander Undercrosing $ 636,000
Task 300 - Support Renton during BNSF Design/Construction To Be Determined
of new Bridge at Strander Undercrossing
Task 400 - Complete 30 Percent Design for BNSF Strander Underpass $ 198,000
Task 500 - Complete 30 Percent Design for UPRR Strander Underpass $ 795,000
Task 600 - Complete 30 Percent Design for Strander to Sound To Be Determined
Transit Station Connection
Task 700 -Assess Feasibility of At-Grade Connection to Sounder $ 353,000
Station from Strander Corridor east of BNSF tracks.
Complete 35 percent design of selected alternative.
Task 800 - Develop final PS&E for At-Grade Connection to Sounder Statioi To Be Determined
Total All Tasks = $ 2,095,000
CONTINGENCY FUNDS
Management Reserve = $ 100,000
Total Contract Amount = $ 2,195,000
12-24-09 Strander Fee Proposal.xls Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT E-2: PROJECT FISETERMINATION 12/24/2009
BergerABAM
TASK SUBTOTALS
Task 100 - Define Final Strander Undercrossing Project Configuration $ 113,000
Task 200 - Define BNSF Bridge at Strander Undercrosing $ 636,000
Task 300 - Support Renton during BNSF Design/Construction To Be Determined
of new Bridge at Strander Undercrossing
Task 400 - Complete 30 Percent Design for BNSF Strander Underpass $ 198,000
Task 500 - Complete 30 Percent Design for UPRR Strander Underpass $ 795,000
Task 600 - Complete 30 Percent Design for Strander to Sound To Be Determined
Transit Station Connection
Task 700 - Assess Feasibility of At-Grade Connection to Sounder $ 353,000
Station from Strander Corridor east of BNSF tracks.
Complete 35 percent design of selected alternative.
Task 800 - Develop final PS&E for At-Grade Connection to Sounder Statioi To Be Determined
Total All Tasks = $ 2,095,000
CONTINGENCY FUNDS
Management Reserve = $ 100,000
Total Contract Amount = $ 2,195,000
12-24-09 Strander Fee Proposal.xls Page 1 of 16
EXHIBIT E-2 - PROJECT FEE GERMINATION . 12/24/2009
BergerABAM - BLENDED HOURLY RATES BY JOB CLASSIFICATION
base wage Ellenaea Hourly
Classification Name I Rate I %Participation Rate
Project Manager Jim Guarre $81.25 30%
Chris Walcott $56.01 60%
Chuck Spry $62.50 10%
100% $64.23
Project Engineer Ross French $48.08 25%
Steve True $50.48 25%
Rob Schurman $40.63 50%
100% $44.96
Structural Engineer Warren Wilson $65.24 10%
Santiago Aguilar $32.21 45%
Greg Banks $34.86 45%
100% $36.71
Civil Engineer Jake Lewing $29.33 40%
Brian Bollen $31.25 30%
Jessica Aguilar $39.42 30%
100% $32.93
Graphics/CADD Jeff Blake $42.64 5%
Wiltrud Ochoxner $34.62 20%
Angel Montalvo $25.38 20%
Nicholas Vu $32.93 20%
Aaron Savage $32.07 35%
100% $31.94
Project Administrator/Clerical Nora Bretana $27.88 20%
Kelly Robinson $27.16 80%
100% $27.30
Note: DSC for BERGER/ABAM Fiscal Year 2010 Effective Through June 30,2010
. Page 2 of 16
EXHIBIT E-2: PROJECT FESETERMINATION • Task 100 Summary
BergerABAM 12/24/2009
DIRECT SALARY COSTS (DSC)for BergerABAM
Personnel Hours Rate Cost
1 Project Manager 188 X $64.23 = $ 12,075
2 Project Engineer 90 X $44.96 = $ 4,046
3 Structural Engineer 28 X $36.71 = $ 1,028
4 Civil Engineer 150 X $32.93 = $ 4,940
5 Graphics/CADD 52 X $31.94 = $ 1,661
6 Admin/Clerical 18 X $27.30 = $ 491
BergerABAM Hours, TOTAL 526 Subtotal Direct Salary Costs(DSC)= $ 24,242
Salary Escalation (SE)0%of work after 4% Increase on 7/1/10=0.0% = $ -
Subtotal (DSC+ SE)= $ 24,242
Direct Salary Costs Multiplier(DSCM) 2.900
TOTAL SALARY COSTS(TSC)(DSC X DSCM)= $ 70,301
DIRECT NONSALARY COSTS(DNSC)
Mileage for Site Visits&Meetings 300 miles @ $ 0.55 $ 165
Drawing Reproduction (11 X 17) 200 copies @ $ 0.16 $ 32
Courier&Postage 6 packages @ 25 $ 150
TOTAL REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES(DNSC)= $ 347
TOTAL BergerABAM FEE(TSC+ DNSC)= $ 70,648
SUBCONSULTANTS
Hanson Professional Services-Railroad Engineering $ 25,871
Perteet-Surveying $ 16,402
TOTAL SUBCONSULTANT FEES= $ 42,273
TOTAL AUTHORIZED AMOUNT = $ 113,000
12-24-09 Strander Fee Proposal.As Page 3 of 16
EXHIBIT E-2-PROJECT FEE DETERMINA ! 12/24/2009
STAFF HOUR ESTIMATE FOR BergerABAM ABAM Task 100
Activity Project Berger
/Dwg. Project Project Structural Civil Graphics/ AdminJ ABAM
TASK ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION No. Manager Engineer Engineer Engineer CADD Clerical Totals
TASK 100-DEFINE FINAL PROJECT CONFIGURATION FOR
APPROVAL 188 90 28 150 52 18 526
TASK 110-PROJECT ADMINISTRATION 108 32 4 4 0 18 166
Project Setup 111 24 0 0 0 0 12 36
Invoicing and Progress Reports 112 8 0 0 0 0 2 10
Subconsultant Coordination 113 16 0 0 0 0 2 18
Project Management and Administration 114 16 0 0 0 0 2 18
Meetings with City 115 16 8 4 4 0 0 32
Quality Assurance and Control 116 28 24 0 0 0 0 52
Basemap 4 8 0 0 0 0 12
Project Configuration Plans for Approval 24 16 0 0 0 0 40
TASK 120-PRELIMINARY STUDIES AND INVESTIGATIONS 20 6 4 6 0 0 36
Railroad Right-of-Entries(ROE) 121 12 4 4 4 0 0 24
Survey 122 8 2 0 2 0 0 12
TASK 130-PRELIMINARY PLANS,PROFILES,AND SECTIONS 60 52 20 140 52 0 324
Design Parameters 131 16 8 12 12 0 0 48
Determine Horizontal and Vertical Alignment 132 12 12 4 40 0 0 68
Roadway Sections 133 24 24 0 24 0 0 72
Prepare Project Configuration Plans for Approval 134 6 6 4 56 44 0 116
Plans 2 2 0 16 12 0 32
Profiles 2 2 4 16 12 0 36
Sections 2 2 0 24 20 0 48
City of Renton Approval 135 2 2 0 8 8 0 20
Page 4 of 16
EXHIBIT E-2: PROJECT FESETERMINATION • Task 200 Summary
BergerABAM 12/24/2009
DIRECT SALARY COSTS(DSC)for BergerABAM
Personnel Hours Rate Cost
1 Project Manager 747 X $64.23 = $ 47,981
2 Project Engineer 408 X $44.96 = $ 18,342
3 Structural Engineer 328 X $36.71 = $ 12,039
4 Civil Engineer 480 X $32.93 = $ 15,808
5 Graphics/CADD 260 X $31.94 = $ 8,305
6 Admin/Clerical 54 X $27.30 = $ 1,474
BergerABAM Hours, TOTAL 2,277 Subtotal Direct Salary Costs(DSC)= $ 103,949
Salary Escalation(SE)25%of work after 4% Increase on 7/1/10 = 1.0% = $ 1,039
Subtotal (DSC+SE)= $ 104,988
Direct Salary Costs Multiplier(DSCM) 2.900
TOTAL SALARY COSTS(TSC)(DSC X DSCM)= $ 304,466
DIRECT NONSALARY COSTS(DNSC)
Mileage for Site Visits&Meetings 1,200 miles @ $ 0.55 $ 660
Drawing Reproduction (11 X 17) 800 copies @ $ 0.16 $ 128
Courier&Postage 24 packages @ 25 $ 600
TOTAL REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES (DNSC)= $ 1,388
TOTAL BergerABAM FEE(TSC+ DNSC)= $ 305,854
SUBCONSULTANTS
Hanson Professional Services-Railroad Engineering $ 141,994
Perteet-Surveying $ 44,507
Shannon and Wilson-Geotechnical $ 143,597
TOTAL SUBCONSULTANT FEES= $ 330,098
TOTAL AUTHORIZED AMOUNT = $ 636,000
12-24-09 Strander Fee Proposal.xls Page 5 of 16
EXHIBIT E-2-PROJECT FEE DETERMINATI� i 12/24/2009
STAFF HOUR ESTIMATE FOR BergerABAM ABAM Task 200
Activity Project Berger
/Dwg. Project Project Structural Civil Graphics/ Admini ABAM
TASK ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION No. Manager Engineer Engineer Engineer CADD Clerical Totals
TASK 200-DEFINE BNSF BRIDGE CONFIGURATION FOR FINAL
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION BY BNSF 747 408 328 480 260 54 2,277
TASK 210-PROJECT ADMINISTRATION 390 144 16 16 0 36 602
Project Setup 211 4 0 0 0 0 4 8
Invoicing and Progress Reports 212 32 0 0 0 0 8 40
Subconsultant Coordination 213 48 0 0 0 0 12 60
Project Management and Administration 214 48 0 0 0 0 12 60
Meetings with City 215 64 32 16 16 0 0 128
Quality Assurance and Control 216 194 112 0 0 0 0 306
Basemap 2 4 0 0 0 0 6
Geotechnical Report 20 6 0 0 0 0 26
"Boat Section"Memorandum 12 6 0 0 0 0 18
Utility Memorandum 36 36 0 0 0 0 72
BNSF Concept Submittal 24 4 0 0 0 0 28
BNSF Structure Type Selection Report 12 4 0 0 0 0 16
BNSF 30%Review Submittal 24 4 0 0 0 0 28
30 Percent Plans 40 24 0 0 0 0 64
30 Percent Cost Estimate 24 24 0 0 0 0 48
TASK 220-PRELIMINARY STUDIES AND INVESTIGATIONS 42 14 12 12 0 0 80
Railroad Right-of-Entries(ROE) 221 0 0 0 4 0 0 4
Survey 222 2 2 0 2 0 0 6
Geotechnical 223 40 12 12 6 0 0 70
TASK 230-PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 144 112 184 204 120 16 780
Underpass Wall/BNSF Bridge Foundations Alternatives 231 32 16 80 0 24 0 152
Bottom Seal Alternatives 232 32 16 80 0 24 0 152
Utilities 233 64 64 0 180 56 16 380
Fiber Optics 24 24 0 60 20 4 132
Metro 36"Sewer 16 16 0 40 12 4 88
Olympic Petroleum Pipeline 8 8 0 24 8 2 50
Seattle Water 8 8 0 24 8 2 50
PSE Buried Power 4 4 0 16 4 2 30
PSE Overhead Power 4 4 0 16 4 2 30
Construction Staging 234 16 16 24 24 16 0 96
TASK 240-PRELIMINARY BNSF DESIGN,COORDINATION,AND
APPROVALS 78 36 26 56 32 0 228
Develop Conceptual BNSF Plans 241 12 8 8 24 16 0 68
BNSF Bridge Type,Size,and Location Report(TS&L) 242 6 6 6 0 0 0 18
Preliminary Shoofly Design 243 12 4 0 8 0 0 24
30%BNSF Review Submittal 244 24 12 12 24 16 0 88
Preliminary Review of C&M Agreement 245 24 6 0 0 0 0 30
TASK 250-OTHER TASKS 18 12 4 18 8 2 62
Determine Additional ROW,Easement,and BNSF ROW Permit
Needs 251 6 6 0 12 8 2 34
Coordinate with Environmental Studies and Permitting 252 12 6 4 6 0 0 28
TASK 260-30 PERCENT PLANS AND ESTIMATE 75 90 86 174 100 0 525
Page 6 of 16
EXHIBIT E-2-PROJECT FEE DETERMINA • 12/24/2009
STAFF HOUR ESTIMATE FOR BergerABAM ABAM Task 200
Activity Project Berger
/Dwg. Project Project Structural Civil Graphics/ AdminJ ABAM
TASK ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION No. Manager Engineer Engineer Engineer CADD Clerical Totals
30 Percent Plans 261 63 66 46 114 100 0 389
Title Sheet 1 1 2 0 4 2 0 9
Underpass Plan and Profile 2 4 4 0 16 12 0 36
Roadway Sections 3 2 4 0 12 8 0 26
Wall/Abutment Plan,Elevation,and Details-Sheet 1 4 4 4 8 1 6 0 23
Wall/Abutment Plan,Elevation,and Details-Sheet 2 5 4 4 8 1 6 0 23
Wall/Abutment Plan,Elevation,and Details-Sheet 3 6 4 4 8 1 6 0 23
Bottom Seal Plan and Elevation 7 4 4 8 1 6 0 23
Fiber Optic Plan,Profile,and Details 8 4 4 0 16 12 0 36
Utility Plans,Profiles,and Details-Sheet 1 9 4 4 0 16 12 0 36
Utility Plans,Profiles,and Details-Sheet 2 10 4 4 0 16 12 0 36
BNSF Bridge Plan,Elevation,Section,and Details-Sheet 1 11 2 2 4 0 0 0 8
BNSF Bridge Plan,Elevation,Section,and Details-Sheet 2 12 2 2 4 0 0 0 8
Shoofly Plans and Profiles-Sheet 1 13 4 4 0 2 0 0 10
Shoofly Plans and Profiles-Sheet 2 14 4 4 0 2 0 0 10
Shoofly Sections 15 4 4 0 2 0 0 10
Construction Staging-Sheet 1 16 4 4 2 8 6 0
Construction Staging-Sheet 2 17 4 4 2 8 6 0
Construction Staging-Sheet 3 18 4 4 2 8 6 0
30 Percent Estimate 262 12 24 40 60 0 0 136
Page 7 of 16
EXHIBIT E-2: PROJECT FIOETERMINATION Task 400 Summary
BergerABAM 12/24/2009
DIRECT SALARY COSTS (DSC)for BergerABAM
Personnel Hours Rate Cost
1 Project Manager 307 X $64.23 = $ 19,719
2 Project Engineer 224 X $44.96 = $ 10,070
3 Structural Engineer 118 X $36.71 = $ 4,331
4 Civil Engineer 454 X $32.93 = $ 14,952
5 Graphics/CADD 162 X $31.94 = $ 5,175
6 Admin/Clerical 40 X $27.30 = $ 1,092
BergerABAM Hours,TOTAL 1,305 Subtotal Direct Salary Costs(DSC)= $ 55,339
Salary Escalation (SE) 100%of work after 4% Increase on 7/1/10=4.0% = $ 2,214
Subtotal (DSC+SE)= $ 57,552
Direct Salary Costs Multiplier(DSCM) 2.900
TOTAL SALARY COSTS(TSC)(DSC X DSCM)= $ 166,901
DIRECT NONSALARY COSTS (DNSC)
Mileage for Site Visits&Meetings 600 miles @ $ 0.55 $ 330
Drawing Reproduction(11 X 17) 400 copies @ $ 0.16 $ 64
Courier&Postage 12 packages @ 25 $ 300
TOTAL REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES (DNSC)= $ 694
TOTAL BergerABAM FEE(TSC+ DNSC)= $ 167,595
SUBCONSULTANTS
Hanson Professional Services-Railroad Engineering $ 10,000
Perteet-Surveying $ 10,000
Shannon and Wilson-Geotechnical $ 10,000
TOTAL SUBCONSULTANT FEES= $ 30,000
TOTAL AUTHORIZED AMOUNT = $ 198,000
12-24-09 Strander Fee ProposalAs Page 8 of 16
EXHIBIT E-2-PROJECT FEE DETERMINATION • 12/24/2009
STAFF HOUR ESTIMATE FOR BergerABAM ABAM Task 400
Activity Project Berger
/Dwg. Project Project S"ctural Civil Graphics/ Admin./ ABAM
TASK ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION No. Manager Engineer Engineer Engineer CARD Clerical Totals
TASK 400-COMPLETE 30%DESIGN FOR THE BNSF UNDERPASS 307 224 118 454 162 40 1,305
TASK 410-PROJECT ADMINISTRATION 136 44 8 8 0 18 214
Project Setup 411 4 0 0 0 0 4 8
Invoicing and Progress Reports 412 16 0 0 0 0 4 20
Subconsultant Coordination 413 16 0 0 0 0 4 20
Project Management and Administration 414 24 0 0 0 0 6 30
Meetings with City 415 32 16 8 8 0 0 64
Quality Assurance and Control 416 44 28 0 0 0 0 72
Stormwater Report 16 8 0 0 0 0 24
30 Percent Plans 16 8 0 0 0 0 24
30 Percent Cost Estimate 12 12 0 0 0 0 24
TASK 420-PRELIMINARY STUDIES AND INVESTIGATIONS 4 4 4 4 0 0 16
Railroad Right-0f-Entries(ROE) 421 4 4 4 4 0 0 16
TASK 430-PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 36 48 24 232 16 8 364
Stormwater Report 431 20 32 0 208 0 8 268
Collect information 4 4 0 16 0 0 24
Size Pipes and Structures 4 4 0 32 0 0 40
Design Quantity and Quality Facilities 4 8 0 64 0 0 76
Estimate Costs 4 8 0 32 0 0 44
Prepare Report 4 8 0 64 0 8 84
Construction Phasing and Staging 432 16 16 24 24 16 0 96
TASK 440-OTHER TASKS 62 44 12 26 20 14 178
Determine Additional ROW,Easement,and BNSF ROW Permit
Needs 441 6 6 0 12 8 2 34
Coordinate with Environmental Studies and Permitting 442 12 6 4 6 0 0 28
Public involvement 443 20 16 8 8 12 4 68
Gather Information 8 8 0 0 0 0 16
Open house/Information Session(1) 12 8 8 8 12 4 52
Funding Assistance 444 24 16 0 0 0 8 48
Compile information 12 8 0 0 0 4 24
Meeting w!FIMSIB(1) 12 8 0 0 0 4 24
TASK 450-30 PERCENT PLANS AND ESTIMATE 69 84 70 184 126 0 533
30 Percent Plans 451 57 60 38 144 126 0 425
Title Sheet 1 1 2 0 4 2 0 9
Underpass Plan and Profile-Sheet 1 2 2 2 0 8 6 0 18
Underpass Plan and Profile-Sheet 2 3 2 2 0 8 6 0 18
Underpass Plan and Profile-Sheet 3 4 2 2 0 8 6 0 18
Roadway Sections 5 2 4 0 12 8 0 26
Wall Plan,Elevation,and Details-Sheet 1 6 4 4 8 1 6 0 23
Wall Plan,Elevation,and Details-Sheet 2 7 4 4 8 1 6 0 23
Wall Plan,Elevation,and Details-Sheet 3 8 4 4 8 1 6 0 23
Bottom Seal Plan and Elevation 9 4 4 8 1 6 0 23
Fiber Optic Plans,Profiles,and Details-Sheet 1 10 4 4 0 16 12 0 36
Fiber Optic Plans,Profiles,and Details-Sheet 2 11 4 4 0 16 12 0 36
Utility Plans,Profiles,and Details-Sheet 1 12 4 4 0 16 12 0 36
Utility Plans,Profiles,and Details-Sheet 2 13 4 4 0 16 12 0 36
Storm Drainage Details 14 4 4 0 12 8 0 28
Construction Phasing and Staging-Sheet 1 15 4 4 2 8 6 0 24
Construction Phasing and Staging-Sheet 2 16 4 4 2 8 6 0 24
Construction Phasing and Staging-Sheet 3 17 4 4 2 8 6 0 24
30 Percent Estimate 452 12 24 32 40 0 0 108
Page 9 of 16
EXHIBIT E-2: PROJECT FIOETERMINATION . Task 500 Summary
BergerABAM 12/24/2009
DIRECT SALARY COSTS (DSC)for BergerABAM
Personnel Hours. Rate Cost
1 Project Manager 727 X $64.23 = $ 46,696
2 Project Engineer 444 X $44.96 = $ 19,960
3 Structural Engineer 254 X $36.71 = $ 9,323
4 Civil Engineer 804 X $32.93 = $ 26,478
5 Graphics/CADD 388 X $31.94 = $ 12,394
6 Admin/Clerical 74 X $27.30 = $ 2,020
BergerABAM Hours, TOTAL 2,691 Subtotal Direct Salary Costs(DSC)= $ 116,871
Salary Escalation (SE)25%of work after 4% Increase on 7/1/10= 1.0% = $ 1,169
Subtotal (DSC+ SE)= $ 118,040
Direct Salary Costs Multiplier(DSCM) 2.900
III
TOTAL SALARY COSTS (TSC)(DSC X DSCM)= $ 342,317
DIRECT NONSALARY COSTS(DNSC)
Mileage for Site Visits&Meetings 1,200 miles @ $ 0.55 $ 660
Drawing Reproduction (11 X 17) 800 copies @ $ 0.16 $ 128
Courier&Postage 24 packages @ 25 $ 600
TOTAL REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES (DNSC)= $ 1,388
TOTAL BergerABAM FEE(TSC+ DNSC)= $ 343,705
SUBCONSULTANTS
Hanson Professional Services-Railroad Engineering $ 147,194
Perteet-Surveying $ 155,420
Shannon and Wilson-Geotechnical $ 148,175
TOTAL SUBCONSULTANT FEES= $ 450,789
TOTAL AUTHORIZED AMOUNT = $ 795,000
12-24-09 Strander Fee Proposal.xis Page 10 of 16
EXHIBIT E-2-PROJECT FEE DETERMINATI 12/24/2009
STAFF HOUR ESTIMATE FOR BergerABAM ABAM Task 500
Activity Project Berger
/Dwg. Project Project Structural Civil Graphics/ Admin./ ABAM
TASK ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION No. Manager Engineer Engineer Engineer CADD Clerical Totals
TASK 500-COMPLETE 30%DESIGN FOR THE UPRR UNDERPASS 727 444 254 804 388 74 2,691
TASK 510-PROJECT ADMINISTRATION 312 104 16 16 0 38 486
Project Setup 511 4 0 0 0 0 4 8
Invoicing and Progress Reports 512 40 0 0 0 0 10 50
Subconsultant Coordination 513 48 0 0 0 0 12 60
Project Management and Administration 514 48 0 0 0 0 12 60
Meetings with City 515 64 32 16 16 0 0 128
Quality Assurance and Control 516 108 72 0 0 0 0 180
Basemap 2 4 0 0 0 0 6
Geotechnical Report 10 4 0 0 0 0 14
Utility Memorandum 24 24 0 0 0 0 48
Stormwater Report 8 4 0 0 0 0
UPRR Concept Submittal 12 4 0 0 0 0 16
UPRR Structure Type Selection Report 8 4 0 0 0 0 12
UPRR 30%Review Submittal 12 4 0 0 0 0 16
30 Percent Plans 20 12 0 0 0 0 32
30 Percent Cost Estimate 12 12 0 0 0 0 24
TASK 520-PRELIMINARY STUDIES AND INVESTIGATIONS 26 10 4 16 0 0 56
Traffic Studies 521 12 4 0 8 0 0 24
Railroad Right-of-Entries(ROE) 522 0 0 0 4 0 0 4
Survey 523 2 2 0 2 0 0 6
Geotechnical 524 12 4 4 2 0 0 22
TASK 530-PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 156 130 128 432 156 22 1,024
Trail Alternatives 531 12 12 24 64 36 0 148
Alternative No.1 4 4 0 16 4 0 28
Alternative No.2 4 4 24 16 24 0 72
Alternative No.3 2 2 0 16 4 0 24
Alternative No.4 2 2 0 16 4 0 24
Secondary Access to Sounder Station 532 32 16 80 0 24 0 152
Driveways 533 4 4 0 24 12 0 44
Traffic Signals 534 2 2 0 4 0 0 8
Utilities 535 80 64 0 212 68 18 442
Fiber Optics 12 12 0 40 12 4 80
Metro 36"Sewer 32 16 0 60 24 4 136
Olympic Petroleum Pipeline 8 8 0 24 8 2 50
Seattle Water 8 8 0 24 8 2 50
PSE Buried Power 4 4 0 16 4 2 30
PSE Overhead Power 4 4 0 16 4 2 30
PSE Buried Gas 12 12 0 32 8 2 66
Stormwater Report 536 10 16 0 104 0 4 134
Collect Information 2 2 0 8 0 0 12
Size Pipes and Structures 2 2 0 16 0 0 20
Design Quantity and Quality Facilities 2 4 0 32 0 0 38
Estimate Costs 2 4 0 16 0 0 22
Prepare Report 2 4 0 32 0 4 42
Construction Staging 537 16 16 24 24 16 0 96
TASK 540-PRELIMINARY UPRR DESIGN,COORDINATION,AND
APPROVALS 52 26 18 40 24 0 160
Develop Conceptual UPRR Plans 541 8 6 6 16 12 0 48
Page 11 of 16
EXHIBIT E-2-PROJECT FEE DETERMINATIO . 12/24/2009
STAFF HOUR ESTIMATE FOR BergerABAM ABAM Task 500
Activity Project Berger
/Dwg. Project Project Structural Civil Graphics/ Admin.l ABAM
TASK ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION No. Manager Engineer Engineer Engineer CADD Clerical Totals
UPRR Bridge Type,Size,and Location Report(TS&L) 542 4 4 4 0 0 0 12
Preliminary Shoofly Design 543 12 4 0 8 0 0 24
30%UPRR Review Submittal 544 16 8 8 16 12 0 60
Preliminary Review of C&M Agreement 545 12 4 0 0 0 0 16
TASK 550-OTHER TASKS 62 44 12 26 20 14 178
Determine Additional ROW,Easement,and UPRR ROW Permit
Needs 551 6 6 0 12 8 2 34
Coordinate with Environmental Studies and Permitting 552 12 6 4 6 0 0 28
Public involvement 553 20 16 8 8 12 4 68
Gather Information 8 8 0 0 0 0 16
Open house/Information Session(1) 12 8 8 8 12 4 52
Funding Assistance 554 24 16 0 0 0 8 48
Compile information 12 8 0 0 0 4 24
Meeting w/FIMSIB(1) 12 8 0 0 0 4 24
TASK 560-30 PERCENT PLANS AND ESTIMATE 119 130 76 274 188 0 787
30 Percent Plans 561 111 114 52 234 188 0 699
Title Sheet 1 1 2 0 4 2 0 9
Underpass Plan and Profile-Sheet 1 2 2 2 0 8 6 0 18
Underpass Plan and Profile-Sheet 2 3 2 2 0 8 6 0 18
Underpass Plan and Profile-Sheet 3 4 2 2 0 8 6 0 18
Roadway Sections 5 2 4 0 12 8 0 26
Sound Transit Secondary Access Plan and Details-Sheet 1 6 2 2 0 8 6 0 18
Sound Transit Secondary Access Plan and Details-Sheet 2 7 2 2 0 8 6 0 18
Driveway Plans,Profiles,and Details-Sheet 1 8 2 2 0 8 6 0 18
Driveway Plans,Profiles,and Details-Sheet 2 9 2 2 0 8 6 0 18
Intersection and Signal Plan 10 2 2 0 2 0 0 6
Wall Plan,Elevation,and Details-Sheet 1 11 4 4 8 1 6 0 23
Wall Plan,Elevation,and Details-Sheet 2 12 4 4 8 1 6 0 23
Wall Plan,Elevation,and Details-Sheet 3 13 4 4 8 1 6 0 23
Bottom Seal Plan and Elevation 14 4 4 8 1 6 0 23
Utility Plans,Profiles,and Details-Sheet 1 15 4 4 0 12 8 0 28
Utility Plans,Profiles,and Details-Sheet 2 16 4 4 0 12 8 0 28
Utility Plans,Profiles,and Details-Sheet 3 17 4 4 0 12 8 0 28
Utility Plans,Profiles,and Details-Sheet 4 18 4 4 0 12 8 0 28
Utility Plans,Profiles,and Details-Sheet 5 19 4 4 0 12 8 0 28
Storm Drainage Details 20 4 4 0 12 8 0 28
Wetland Mitigation Plan-Sheet 1 21 2 2 0 8 6 0 18
Wetland Mitigation Plan-Sheet 2 22 2 2 0 8 6 0 18
UPRR Bridge Plan,Elevation,Section,and Details-Sheet 1 23 2 2 4 0 0 0 8
UPRR Bridge Plan,Elevation,Section,and Details-Sheet 2 24 2 2 4 0 0 0 8
Trail and Trail Bridge Plan,Elevation,Sections,and Details-Sheet 1 25 2 2 6 6 8 0 24
Trail and Trail Bridge Plan,Elevation,Sections,and Details-Sheet 2 26 2 2 6 6 8 0 24
Shoofly Plans and Profiles-Sheet 1 27 4 4 0 2 0 0 10
Shoofly Plans and Profiles-Sheet 2 28 4 4 0 2 0 0 10
Shoofly Plans and Profiles-Sheet 3 29 4 4 0 2 0 0 10
Shoofly Sections 30 4 4 0 2 0 0 10
Construction Staging-Sheet 1 31 8 8 0 16 12 0 44
Construction Staging-Sheet 2 32 8 8 0 16 12 0 44
Construction Staging-Sheet 3 33 8 8 0 16 12 0 44
30 Percent Estimate 562 8 16 24 40 0 0 88
Page 12 of 16
EXHIBIT E-2: PROJECT FAETERMINATION Task 700 Summary
BergerABAM 12/24/2009
DIRECT SALARY COSTS (DSC)for BergerABAM
Personnel Hours Rate Cost
1 Project Manager 318 X $64.23 = $ 20,425
2 Project Engineer 452 X $44.96 = $ 20,320
3 Structural Engineer 0 X $36.71 = $ -
4 Civil Engineer 761 X $32.93 = $ 25,062
5 Graphics/CADD 832 X $31.94 = $ 26,576
6 Admin/Clerical 134 X $27.30 = $ 3,659
BergerABAM Hours, TOTAL 2,497 Subtotal Direct Salary Costs(DSC)= $ 96,042
Salary Escalation (SE)25%of work after 4% Increase on 7/1/10= 1.0% = $ 960
Subtotal (DSC+SE)= $ 97,002
Direct Salary Costs Multiplier(DSCM) 2.900
TOTAL SALARY COSTS(TSC)(DSC X DSCM)= $ 281,307
DIRECT NONSALARY COSTS (DNSC)
Mileage for Site Visits&Meetings 1,200 miles @ $ 0.55 $ 660
Drawing Reproduction(11 X 17) 800 copies @ $ 0.16 $ 128
Courier&Postage 24 packages @ 25 $ 600
TOTAL REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES(DNSC)= $ 1,388
TOTAL BergerABAM FEE(TSC+ DNSC)= $ 282,695
SUBCONSULTANTS
Hanson Professional Services-Railroad Engineering $ 15,000
Perteet-Surveying $ 35,000
Shannon and Wilson-Geotechnical $ 20,000
TOTAL SUBCONSULTANT FEES= $ 70,000
TOTAL AUTHORIZED AMOUNT = $ 353,000
Amounts shown above for subconsultants have been estimated by BergerABAM.
These fee amounts will be confimred following receipt of written NTP from the City
for this primary task. Additional amounts, if any, will be authorized from the
management reserve or in an additional supplement.
12-24-09 Strander Fee Proposal.xls Page 13 of 16
EXHIBIT E-2-PROJECT FEE DETERMINATIO • 12/24/2009
STAFF HOUR ESTIMATE FOR BergerABAM ABAM Task 700
Activity Project Berger
/Dwg. Project Project Structural Civil Graphics/ AdminJ ABAM
TASK ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION No. Manager Engineer Engineer Engineer CARD Clerical Totals
TASK 700-ASSESS THE FEASIBILITY AND COSTS ASSOCIATED
WITH AT-GRADE CONNECTIONS TO THE SOUNDER STATION 318 452 0 761 832 134 2,497
TASK 710-PROJECT ADMINISTRATION TIOrI 162 74 0 16 0 96 348
Project Setup 711 8 0 0 0 0 8 16
Invoicing and Progress Reports 712 12 0 0 0 0 12 24
Subconsultant Coordination 713 8 0 0 0 0 12 20
Project Management and Administration 714 48 0 0 0 0 48 96
Meetings with City 715 24 24 0 12 0 4 64
Quality Assurance and Control 716 62 50 0 4 0 12 128
Basemap 0 4 0 4 0 0 8
Geotechnical Design Memorandum 10 6 0 0 0 0 16
DRAFT Design Memorandum 12 8 0 0 0 4 24
FINAL Design Memorandum 8 4 0 0 0 4 16
Preliminary Project Cost Estimate 8 4 0 0 0 0 12
Preliminary Design Drawings 24 24 0 0 0 4 52
TASK 720-PRELIMINARY STUDIES AND INVESTIGATIONS 720w 8 10 0 14 14 0 46
Railroad Right-of-Entries(ROE) 721 6 6 0 6 6 0 24
Survey 722 2 4 0 8 8 0 22
TASK 730-PRELIMINARY PLANS,PROFILES,AND SECTIONS OW 3 106 228 0 408 416 34 1,192
Design Parameters 731 2 6 0 8 0 0 16
Determine Horizontal and Vertical Alignment 732 8 12 0 24 56 0 100
Alternative A 2 2 0 4 12 0 20
Alternative B 2 2 0 4 12 0 20
Alternative C 2 4 0 8 16 0 30
Alternative D 2 4 0 8 16 0 30
Coordinate Access through BNSF R/W with BNSF 733 4 8 0 4 4 4 24
Develop Geotechnical Design Memorandum 734 12 8 0 0 0 4 24
Develop Alternative Drainage and Water Quality Prelim Designs 735 16 48 0 160 96 0 320
Alternative A 4 8 0 32 16 0 60
Alternative B 4 8 0 40 24 0 76
Alternative C 4 16 0 40 24 0 84
Alternative D 4 16 0 48 32 0 100
Develop Alternative Maint and Protection of Utility Prelim Designs 736 8 32 0 40 40 0 120
Alternative A 2 8 0 8 8 0 26
Alternative B 2 8 0 12 12 0 34
Alternative C 2 8 0 8 8 0 26
Alternative D 2 8 0 12 12 0 34
Roadway Sections 737 8 16 0 20 40 0 84
Alternative A 2 4 0 4 8 0 18
Alternative B 2 4 0 6 12 0 24
Alternative C 2 4 0 4 8 0 18
Alternative D 2 4 0 6 12 0 24
Prepare Preliminary Drawings for At-Grade Alternatives 738 8 16 0 56 72 0 152
Alternative A 2 4 0 12 16 0 34
Alternative B 2 4 0 16 20 0 42
Alternative C 2 4 0 12 16 0 34
Alternative D 2 4 0 16 20 0 42
Prepare Project Cost Estimates for At-Grade Alternatives 739 8 20 0 60 84 0 172
Alternative A 2 4 0 12 16 0 34
Alternative B 2 4 0 16 20 0 42
Alternative C 2 6 0 16 24 0 48
Alternative D 2 6 0 16 24 0 48
Page 14 of 16
EXHIBIT E-2-PROJECT FEE DETERMINATIIO • 12/24/2009
STAFF HOUR ESTIMATE FOR BergerABAM ABAM Task 700
Activity Project Berger
/Dwg. Project Project Structural Civil Graphics/ AdminJ ABAM
TASK ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION No. Manager Engineer Engineer Engineer CADD Clerical Totals
Prepare Draft and Final Design Memo for At-Grade Alternatives 740 20 40 0 16 8 24 108
Prepare DRAFT Memorandum 12 24 0 8 4 16 64
Prepare FINAL Memorandum 8 16 0 8 4 8 44
City of Renton Comment/Approval 741 12 22 0 20 16 2 72
Attend Review Meeting 6 6 0 0 0 0 12
Address Review Comments 4 12 0 16 16 0 48
Submit Revisions for Approval 2 4 0 4 0 2 12
TASK 750-DEVELOP PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE TO 35%DESIGN 750 s 42 140 0 323 402 4 911
Prepare Drainage Report 751 4 12 0 40 12 4 72
Prepare R/W Plans and Legal Descriptions 752 8 37 0 54 84 0 183
Cover Sheet 1 0 1 0 2 4 0 7
Legend&Abbreviations 2 0 4 0 4 8 0 16
Right of Way Plan-Sheet 1 3 1 4 0 6 12 0 23
Right of Way Plan-Sheet 2 4 1 4 0 6 12 0 23
Right of Way Plan-Sheet 3 5 1 4 0 6 12 0 23
Right of Way Plan-Sheet 4 6 1 4 0 6 12 0 23
Right of Way Plan-Sheet 5 7 1 4 0 6 12 0 23
Right of Way Plan-Sheet 6 8 1 4 0 6 12 0 23
Prepare Legal Descriptions 2 8 0 12 0 0 22
Utility Coordination and Design 753 4 16 0 40 32 0 92
Prepare 35%Design Plans (assumed Alternative C) 754 26 75 0 189 274 0 564
Cover Sheet With-Vicinity Map 1 0 1 0 2 4 0 7
General Notes 2 1 4 0 8 4 0 17
Drawing Index 3 0 1 0 2 4 0 7
Legend&Abbreviations 4 0 4 0 4 8 0 16
Key Plan Layout 5 0 1 0 4 8 0 13
Roadway Alignment Plan 6 1 2 0 4 8 0 15
TESC Notes 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TESC Plan-Sheet 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TESC Plan-Sheet 2 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TESC Plan-Sheet 3 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TESC Plan-Sheet 4 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TESC Plan-Sheet 5 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TESC Plan-Sheet 6 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site Prep&Demolition Plan-Sheet 1 14 1 4 0 8 8 0 21
Site Prep&Demolition Plan-Sheet 2 15 1 4 0 8 8 0 21
Site Prep&Demolition Plan-Sheet 3 16 1 4 0 8 8 0 21
Site Prep&Demolition Plan-Sheet 4 17 1 4 0 8 8 0 21
Site Prep&Demolition Plan-Sheet 5 18 1 4 0 8 8 0 21
Site Prep&Demolition Plan-Sheet 6 19 1 4 0 8 8 0 21
Roadway Sections-Sheet 1 20 1 2 0 4 8 0 15
Roadway Sections-Sheet 2 21 1 2 0 4 8 0 15
Roadway Plan&Profile-Sheet 1 22 1 2 0 8 12 0 23
Roadway Plan&Profile-Sheet 2 23 1 2 0 8 12 0 23
Roadway Plan&Profile-Sheet 3 24 1 2 0 8 12 0 23
Roadway Plan&Profile-Sheet 4 25 1 2 0 8 12 0 23
Roadway Plan&Profile-Sheet 5 26 1 2 0 8 12 0 23
Roadway Plan&Profile-Sheet 6 27 1 2 0 8 12 0 23
Roadway Details-Sheet 1 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Roadway Details-Sheet 2 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Drainage and Pump Station Details-Sheet 1 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Drainage Details-Sheet 2 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Street Utility Plan&Profile-Sheet 1 32 1 2 0 8 12 0 23
Street Utility Plan&Profile-Sheet 2 33 1 2 0 8 12 0 23
Street Utility Plan&Profile-Sheet 3 34 1 2 0 8 12 0 23
Street Utility Plan&Profile-Sheet 4 35 1 2 0 8 12 0 23
Street Utility Plan&Profile-Sheet 5 36 1 2 0 8 12 0 23
Street Utility Plan&Profile-Sheet 6 37 1 2 0 8 12 0 23
Street Utility Details-Sheet 1 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Street Utility Details-Sheet 2 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Intersection Plan-SW 27th St 40 0 2 0 4 8 0 14
Intersection Plan-Strander 41 0 2 0 4 8 0 14
Intersection Plan-SW 21 st St 42 0 2 0 4 8 0 14
Paving Plan-Sheet 1 43 4 4 0 1 6 0 15
Paving Plan-Sheet 2 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Paving Plan-Sheet 3 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Paving Plan-Sheet 4 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Paving Plan-Sheet 5 47 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Paving Plan-Sheet 6 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Page 15 of 16
EXHIBIT E-2-PROJECT FEE DETERMINATI. • 12/2412009
STAFF HOUR ESTIMATE FOR BergerABAM ABAM Task 700
Activity Project Berger
IDwg. Project Project Structural Civil Graphics/ AdminJ ABAM
TASK ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION No. Manager Engineer Engineer Engineer CARD Clerical Totals
Illumination Plan-Sheet 1 49 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Illumination Plan-Sheet 2 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Illumination Plan-Sheet 3 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Illumination Plan-Sheet 4 52 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Illumination Plan-Sheet 5 53 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Illumination Plan-Sheet 6 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Channelization&-Signing Plan-Sheet 1 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Channelization&-Signing Plan-Sheet 2 56 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Channelization&-Signing Plan-Sheet 3 57 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Channelization&-Signing Plan-Sheet 4 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Channelization&-Signing Plan-Sheet 5 59 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Channelization&-Signing Plan-Sheet 6 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Page 16 of 16
• i
Exhibit G-2
Subconsultant Fee Determination - Summary Sheet
(Specific Rates of Pay)
Fee Schedule
Subconsultant
Hourly Overhead Profit Rate
Discipline or Job Title Rate @ % @ % Per Hour
SEE D-3 FOR HOURLY RATES
DOT 140-089 EF Exhibit E-2
8/07
EXHIBIT G-2: PROJECT F TERMINATION Task 100 .Summary
Hanson • 9/25/2009
DIRECT SALARY COSTS(QSC)
Personnel Hours Rate Cost
1 Principal 17 X $74.87 = $ 1,273
2 E VII 74 X $46.40 = $ 3,434
3 E V 23 X $41.37 = $ 952
4 E III 15 X $25.34 = $ 380
5 Tech. 24 X $25.37 = $ 609
6 Admin. 13 X $22.00 = $ 286
Hanson Hours,TOTAL 166 Subtotal Direct Salary Costs(DSC)_ $ 6,933
Salary Escalation (SE)0% of work after 4% Increase on 1/1/10=0.0% _ $ -
Subtotal(DSC+SE)_ $ 6,933
Direct Salary Costs Multiplier(DSCM) 3.022
TOTAL SALARY COSTS (TSC)(DSC X DSCM)_ $ 20,951
DIRECT NONSALARY COSTS DNSC
Mileage for Site Visits&Meetings 200 miles @ $ 0.550 $ 110
Travel for Meetings 1 ea @ $ 885.00 $ 885
Railroad ROE application fees 2 ea @ $ 1,500.00 $ 3,000
Vehicle days 2 ea @ $ 45.00 $ 90
CADD 50 hr @ $ 15.00 $ 750
Printing 1 Is @ $ 50.00 $ 50
Courier& Postage 1 packages @ 35 $ 35
TOTAL REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES(DNSC)= $ 4,920
TOTAL FEE (TSC+DNSC)= $ 25,871
9-25-09 Hanson Fee Proposal.xls Page 1 of 8
EXHIBIT G-2-PROJECT FEE DETERMIN 9/25/2009
STAFF HOUR ESTIMATE FOR HANSON • Hanson Task 100
Activity
/Dwg. Hanson
TASK ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION No. Principal E VII E V E III Tech. Admin. Totals
TASK 100-DEFINE FINAL PROJECT CONFIGURATION FOR
APPROVAL 17 74 23 15 24 13 166
TASK 110-PROJECT ADMINISTRATION 17 64 7 13 12 13 126
Project Setup 111 6 10 0 0 0 6 22
Agreement Review 6 6 0 0 0 0 12
Establish Project File Structure 0 4 0 0 0 6 10
Invoicing and Progress Reports 112 0 3 0 0 2 2 7
Subconsultant Coordination 113 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Management and Administration 114 1 15 5 1 2 4 28
Task Management 1 12 3 0 0 2 18
Coordination with Other Tasks 0 3 2 1 2 2 10
Meetings with City 115 8 32 0 8 8 1 57
Quality Assurance and Control 116 2 4 2 4 0 0 12
Project Configuration Plans for Approval 2 4 2 4 0 0 12
TASK 120-PRELIMINARY STUDIES AND INVESTIGATIONS 0 6 0 0 8 0 14
Railroad Right-of-Entries(ROE) 121 0 6 0 0 8 0 14
Survey 122 0 0 0 0 0 0
TASK 130-PRELIMINARY PLANS,PROFILES,AND SECTIONS 0 4 16 2 4 0 26
Design Parameters 131 0 4 16 2 4 0 26
Determine Horizontal and Vertical Alignment 132 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
Roadway Sections 133 0 0 0 0 0 0
Prepare Project Configuration Plans for Approval 134 0 0 0 0 0 0
City of Renton Approval 135 0 0 0 0 0 0
Page 2 of 8
EXHIBIT G-2: PROJECT FFf ETERMINATION Task 200 Summary
Hanson is 9/25/2009
DIRECT SALARY COSTS(DSC)
Personnel Hours Rate Cost
1 Principal 89 X $74.87 = $ 6,663
2 E VII 246 X $46.40 = $ 11,414
3 E V 326 X $41.37 = $ 13,487
4 E III 189 X $25.34 = $ 4,789
5 Tech. 233 X $25.37 $ 5,911
6 Admin. 34 X $22.00 = $ 748
Hanson Hours,TOTAL 1,117 Subtotal Direct Salary Costs(DSC) _ $ 43,013
Salary Escalation (SE) 100%of work after 4% Increase on 111/10=4.0% $ 1,721
Subtotal (DSC+ SE)_ $ 44,733
Direct Salary Costs Multiplier(DSCM): 3.022
TOTAL SALARY COSTS(TSC)(DSC X DSCM)_ $ 135,184
DIRECT NONSALARY COSTS(DNSC)
Mileage for Site Visits& Meetings 800 miles @ $ 0.550 $ 440
Travel for Meetings 2 ea @ $ 885.00 $ 1,770
Railroad ROE application fees 0 ea @ $1,500.00 $ -
Vehicle days 6 ea @ $ 45.00 $ 270
CADD 250 hr @ $ 15.00 $ 3,750
Printing 1 Is @ $ 300.00 $ 300
Courier& Postage 8 packages @ 35 $ 280
TOTAL REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES(DNSC)= $ 6,810
TOTAL FEE (TSC+DNSC)= $ 141,994
9-25-09 Hanson Fee Proposal.xis Page 3 of 8
EXHIBIT G-2-PROJECT FEE DETERMIN"N 9/25/2009
STAFF HOUR ESTIMATE FOR HANSON Hanson Task 200
Activity
/Dwg. Hanson
TASK ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION No. Principal E VII E V E fit Tech. Admin. Totals
TASK 200-DEFINE BNSF BRIDGE CONFIGURATION FOR FINAL
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION BY BNSF 89 246 326 189 233 34 1,117
TASK 210-PROJECT ADMINISTRATION 26 92 24 34 32 24 232
Project Setup 211 0 4 0 0 0 6 10
Invoicing and Progress Reports 212 0 12 0 0 8 8 2B
Subconsultant Coordination 213 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Management and Administration 214 2 30 10 2 4 8 56
Task Management 2 24 6 0 0 4 36
Coordination with Other Tasks 0 6 4 2 4 4 20
Meetings with City 215 16 32 0 16 16 2 82
Quality Assurance and Control 216 8 14 14 16 4 0 56
Basemap. 0 0 0 2 0 0 2
Geotechnical Report 0 2 2 2 0 0 6
"Boat Section"Memorandum 0 2 2 2 2 0 8
BNSF Concept Submittal 0 2 2 2 0 0 6
BNSF Structure Type Selection Report 0 2 2 2 2 0 8
BNSF 30%Review Submittal 0 2 2 2 0 0 6
30 Percent Plans 6 2 2 2 0 0 12
30 Percent Cost Estimate 2 2 2 2 0 0 8
TASK 220-PRELIMINARY STUDIES AND INVESTIGATIONS 0 1 0 0 1 0 2
Railroad Right-of-Entries(ROE) 221 0 1 0 0 1 0 2
Survey 222 0 0 0 0 0 0
Geotechnical 223 0 0 0 0 0 0
TASK 230-PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 12 34 54 24 22 0 146
Underpass Wall/BNSF Bridge Foundations Alternatives 231 0 2 12 0 4 0 18
Bottom Seal Alternatives 232 0 2 2 0 0 0 4
Utilities 233 0 0 12 14 2 0 28
Fiber Optics 0 0 2 4 2 0 8
Metro 36"Sewer 0 0 2 2 0 0 4
Olympic Petroleum Pipeline 0 0 2 2 0 0 4
Seattle Water 0 0 2 2 0 0 4
PSE Buried Power 0 0 2 2 0 0 4
PSE Overhead Power 0 0 2 2 0 0 4
Construction Staging _ 234 12 30 28 10 16 0 96
Develop Staging Options at Bridges 6 8 20 2 8 0 44
Preliminary Shoring Considerations 0 2 4 8 4 0 18
Coordination with BNSF 6 20 4 0 4 0 34
TASK 240-PRELIMINARY BNSF DESIGN,COORDINATION,AND
APPROVALS 37 87 203 114 94 10 545
Develop Conceptual BNSF Plans 241 8 25 41 6 8 2 90
Meeting w/BNSF 4 16 16 0 0 2 38
Develop Preliminary Alignmerit 4 9 24 2 4 0 43
Develop Preliminary Structure Deplhs/Typ.Sections 0 0 1 4 4 0 9
BNSF Bridge Type,Size,and Location Report(TS&L) 242 3 24 48 100 66 2 243
Preliminary Bridge Design 2 8 12 40 0 0 62
Preliminary Bridge Drawings 0 8 12 4 60 0 84
Opinion of Probable Construction Cost 0 4 0 24 0 0 28
Structure Type Selection Report 1 2 20 8 2 2 35
30%Design of the Preferred BNSF Bridge Alternative 0 2 4 24 4 0 34
Preliminary Shoofly Design 243 16 14 74 2 2 0 108
Develop Constraints/Criteria at Bridges 0 2 2 2 2 0 8
Preliminary BNSF Shoofly Design 8 8 32 0 0 0 48
30%Design of the Preferred BNSF Alignmentl 4 4 32 0 0 0 40
Page 4 of 8
EXHIBIT G-2-PROJECT FEE DETERMIIN 9/25/2009
STAFF HOUR ESTIMATE FOR HANSO Hanson Task 200
Activity
/Dwg. Hanson
TASK ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION No. Principal E VII E V E III Tech. Admin. Totals
Opinion of Probable BNSF Construction Cost 4 0 8 0 0 0 12
30%BNSF Review Submittal 244 10 24 40 6 18 6 104
30%Railroad Review Submittal Document Prep. 2 8 2 4 4 20
Review Meeting 8 16 16 2 42
Response to 30%Reviews 2 4 8 2 16
Revisions to Documents to Incorporate Review Comments 2 8 4 12 26
Preliminary Review of C&M Agreement 245 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
TASK 250-OTHER TASKS 0 17 10 2 20 0 49
Determine Additional ROW,Easement,and BNSF ROW Permit
Needs 251 0 9 2 2 16 0 29
Coordinate with Environmental Studies and Permitting 252 0 8 8 0 4 0 20
TASK 260.30 PERCENT PLANS AND ESTIMATE 14 15 35 15 64 0 143
30 Percent Plans 261 8 13 27 7 64 0 119
BNSF Bridge Plan,Elevation,Section,and Details-Sheet 1 11 1 2 2 2 12 0 19
BNSF Bridge Plan,Elevation,Section,and Details-Sheet 2 12 1 2 2 2 12 0 19
Shoofly Plans and Profiles-Sheet 1 13 1 2 8 0 4 0 15
Shoofly Plans and Profiles-Sheet 2 14 1 2 8 0 4 0 15
Shoofly Sections 15 1 2 4 0 8 0 15
Construction Staging-Sheet 1 16 1 1 1 1 8 0 12
Construction Staging-Sheet 2 17 1 1 1 1 8 0 12
Construction Staging-Sheet 3 18 1 1 1 1 8 0 12
30 Percent Estimate 262 6 2 8 8 0 0 24
BNSF Bridge 1 1 2 8 0 0 12
BNSF Shoofly 4 0 4 0 0 0 8
Estimate of Phase 300 Bridge Engineering 1 1 2 0 0 0 4
Page 5 of 8
EXHIBIT G-2: PROJECT FE I TERMINATION Task 500 Summary
Hanson 9/25/2009
DIRECT SALARY COSTS(QSC)
Personnel Hours Rate Cost
1 Principal 89 X $74.87 = $ 6,663
2 E VII 246 X $46.40 = $ 11,414
3 E V 326 X $41.37 = $ 13,487
4 E III 189 X $25.34 = $ 4,789
5 Tech. 233 X $25.37 = $ 5,911
6 Admin. 34 X $22.00 = $ 748
Hanson Hours,TOTAL 1,117 Subtotal Direct Salary Costs(DSC)= $ 43,013
Salary Escalation(SE)100%of work after 4% Increase on 1/1/10=4.0%= $ 1,721
+ 100%of work after 4% Increase on 1/1/11 =4.0%= $ 1,721
Subtotal(DSC+ SE)= $ 46,454
Direct Salary Costs Multiplier(DSCM) 3.022
TOTAL SALARY COSTS(TSC)(DSC X DSCM)= $ 140,3B4
DIRECT NONSALARY COSTS(DNSC)
Mileage for Site Visits&Meetings 800 miles @ $ 0.550 $ 440
Travel for Meetings 2 ea @ $ 885.00 $ 1,770
Railroad ROE application fees 0 ea @ $ 1,500.00 $ -
Vehicle days 6 ea @ $ 45.00 $ 270
CADD 250 hr @ $ 15.00 $ 3,750
Printing 1 Is @ $ 300.00 $ 300
Courier&Postage 8 packages @ 35 $ 280
TOTAL REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES(DNSC)= $ 6,810
TOTAL FEE (TSC+ DNSC)= $ 147,194
9-25-09 Hanson Fee Proposal.xls Page 6 of 8
EXHIBIT G-2-PROJECT FEE DETERM�N 9/25/2009
STAFF HOUR ESTIMATE FOR HANSO Hanson Task 500
Activity
/Dwg. Hanson
TASK ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION No. Principal E VII E V E III Tech. Admin. Totals
TASK 500-DEFINE BNSF BRIDGE CONFIGURATION FOR FINAL
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION BY BNSF 89 254 320 189 235 36 1,123
TASK 510-PROJECT ADMINISTRATION 26 103 26 34 34 26 249
Project Setup 511 0 4 0 0 0 6 10
Invoicing and Progress Reports 512 0 15 0 0 10 10 35
Subconsultant Coordination 513 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Management and Administration 514 2 38 12 2 4 8 66
Task Management 2 30 8 0 0 4 44
7 0 8 4 2 4 4 22
Meetings with City 515 16 32 0 16 16 2 82
Quality Assurance and Control 516 8 14 14 16 4 0 56
Basemap 0 0 0 2 0 0 2
Geotechnical Report 0 2 2 2 0 0 6
'Boat Section'Memorandum 0 2 2 2 2 0 8
BNSF Concept Submittal 0 2 2 2 0 0 6
BNSF Structure Type Selection Report 0 2 2 2 2 0 8
BNSF 30%Review Submittal 0 2 2 2 0 0 6
30 Percent Plans 6 2 2 2 0 0 12
30 Percent Cost Estimate 2 2 2 2 0 0 8
TASK 520-PRELIMINARY STUDIES AND INVESTIGATIONS 0 1 0 0 1 0 2
Railroad Right-of-Entries(ROE) 521 0 1 0 0 1 0 2
Survey 522 0 0 0 0 0 0
Geotechnical 523 0 0 0 0 0 0
TASK 530-PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 12 30 40 24 18 0 124
Trail Alternatives 531 0 0 0 0 0 0
Secondary Access to Sounder Station 532 0 0 0 0 0 0
Driveways 533 0 0 0 0 0 0
Traffic Signals 534 0 0 0 0 0 0
Utilities 535 0 0 12 14 2 0 28
Fiber Optics 0 0 2 4 2 0 8
Metro 36"Sewer 0 0 2 2 0 0 4
Olympic Petroleum Pipeline 0 0 2 2 0 0 4
Seattle Water 0 0 2 2 0 0 4
PSE Buried Power 0 0 2 2 0 0 4
PSE Overhead Power 0 0 2 2 0 0 4
Stormwater Report 536 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
Construction Staging 537 12 30 28 10 16 0 96
Develop Staging Options at Bridges 6 8 20 2 8 0 44
Preliminary Shoring Considerations 0 2 4 8 4 0 18
Coordination with UPRR 6 20 4 0 4 0 34
TASK 540-PRELIMINARY BNSF DESIGN,COORDINATION,AND
APPROVALS 37 87 203 114 94 10 545
Develop Conceptual UPRR Plans 541 8 25 41 6 8 2 90
Meeting w/UPRR 4 16 16 0 0 2 38
Develop Preliminary Alignment 4 9 24 2 4 0 43
Develop Preliminary Structure Depths/Typ.Sections 0 0 1 4 4 0 9
UPRR Bridge Type,Size,and Location Report(TS&L) 542 3 24 48 100 66 2 243
Preliminary Bridge Design 2 8 12 40 0 0 62
Preliminary Bridge Drawings 0 8 12 4 60 0 84
Opinion of Probable Construction Cost 0 4 0 24 0 0 28
Structure Type Selection Reportl 1 2 20 8 2 2 35
Page 7 of 8
EXHIBIT G-2-PROJECT FEE DETERMI N 9/25/2009
STAFF HOUR ESTIMATE FOR HANSON* Hanson Task 500
Activity
- /Dwg. Hanson
TASK ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION No. Principal E vll E V E III Tech. Admin. Totals
30%Design of the Preferred UPRR Bridge Alternative 0 2 4 24 4 0 34
Preliminary Shoofly Design 543 16 14 74 2 2 0 108
Develop Constraints/Criteria at Bridges 0 2 2 2 2 0 8
Preliminary UPRR Shoofly Design 8 8 32 0 0 0 48
30%Design of the Preferred UPRR Alignment 4 4 32 0 0 0 40
Opinion of Probable UPRR Construction Cost 4 0 8 0 0 0 12
30%UPRR Review Submittal 544 10 24 40 6 18 6 104
30%Railroad Review Submittal Document Prep. 2 8 2 4 4 20
Review Meeting 8 16 16 2 42
Response to 30%Reviews 2 4 8 2 16
Revisions to Documents to Incorporate Review Comments 2 8 4 12 26
Preliminary Review of C&M Agreement 545 0 0 0 0 0 0
TASK 550-OTHER TASKS 0 17 10 2 20 0 49
Determine Additional ROW,Easement,and UPRR ROW Permit
Needs 551 0 9 2 2 16 0 29
Coordinate with Environmental Studies and Permitting 552 0 8 8 0 4 0 20
Public involvement 553 0 0 0 0 0 0
Funding Assistance 554 0 0 0 0 0 0
TASK 560-30 PERCENT PLANS AND ESTIMATE 14 16 41 15 68 0 154
30 Percent Plans 561 9 15 35 7 68 0 134
UPRR Bridge Plan,Elevation,Section,and Details-Sheet 1 23 1 2 2 2 12 0 19
UPRR Bridge Plan,Elevation,Section,and Details-Sheet 2 24 1 2 2 2 12 0 19
Shoofly Plans and Profiles-Sheet 1 27 1 2 8 0 4 0 15
Shoofly Plans and Profiles-Sheet 2 28 1 2 8 0 4 0 15
Shoofly Plans and Profiles-Sheet 3 29 1 2 8 0 4 0 15
Shoofly Sections 30 1 2 4 0 8 0 15
Construction Staging-Sheet 1 31 1 1 1 1 8 0 12
Construction Staging-Sheet 2 32 1 1 1 1 8 0 12
Construction Staging-Sheet 3 33 1 1 1 1 8 0 12
30 Percent Estimate 562 5 1 6 8 0 0 20
UPRR Bridge 1 1 2 8 0 0 12
UPRR Shoofly 4 0 4 0 0 0 8
Page 8 of 8
EXHIBIT G-2: PROJECT F*ETERMINATION Task 100 Summary
Perteet 9/2512009
DIRECT SALARY COSTS (DSC)
Personnel Hours Rate Cost
1 Lead Planner 0 X $41.02 = $ -
2 Senior Planner 0 X $53.00 = $ -
3 Lead Technician 0 X $34.50 = $ -
4 Planner 1 0 X $22.52 = $ -
5 Planner II 0 X $31.20 = $ -
6 Senior Engineer(Design) 8 X $52.76 = $ 422
7 Engineer II (Design) 0 X $31.42 = $ -
8 Lead Tech(Design) 0 X $34.00 = $ -
X
9 Principal Surveyor 4 $61.78 —— $ 247
10 Sr. PLS/PM 10 X $45.67 = $ 457
12 Project Surveyor 36 X $33.00 = $ 1,188
13 CAD (Survey) 38 X $31.00 = $ 1,178
14 Survey Tech IV 28 X $30.35 = $ 850
15 Survey Tech III 28 X $26.00 = $ 728
16 Survey Tech II 2 X $20.00 = $ 40
17 Clerical 0 X $26.00 = $ -
Perteet Hours,TOTAL 154 Subtotal Direct Salary Costs(DSC) = $ 5,110
Salary Escalation(SE)0%of work after 4% Increase on 6/1/10=0.0% = $ -
Subtotal(DSC+SE)= $ .5,110
Direct Salary Costs Multiplier(DSCM) 3.025
TOTAL SALARY COSTS (TSC)(DSC X DSCM) = $ 15,457
DIRECT NONSALARY COSTS(DNSC)
Mileage for Site Visits&Meetings 500 miles @ $ 0.550 $ 275
Courier& Postage 6 packages @ 20 $ 120
GPS Recievers 1 day @ 300 $ 300
Robotic EDM 2 days @ 100 $ 200
Digital Level 1 day @ 50 $ 50
TOTAL REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES(DNSC) = $ 945
TOTAL FEE (TSC +DNSC) = $ 167402
9-25-09 Perteet Fee Proposal.xls Page 1 of 7
N V < m O -e tD N'C NN tDOOtGNtD 1
�y r
y O ;
00 a�-
0 0
N v
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0
t S
0 �„ `e
� U �
d
N � N O O O O O O 00 N O N O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O
a
W O O O O O O =0 N OD N N o O o o o 0 0 o o O O O O O O
p` N r
5
0 N N N 0 0 to 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O
N r r
pr�
5
O O O O O O O O O w o o 0 0 o N O N N O O O O O O
r
Q
U
tD O O O O O O 0 0 M N c'0 0 to O t0 to O N O O O O O O
M r
�z
O m O O O N '7 N N N O N O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O
m r
sF a O O O N O N N O O =000000000 O O O O O O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 ° 0000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0
IL
0 0$
O O O 0 O O O O o O O 0000000000 -° O O 0 O 0
g�
�o
0000000000 0 0 o O o 0
v`wo
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0000000000 0 0 0 0 0 °
O 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 o O 0 0 0 0 0 0'0 0 0 0 o O O 0 O 0
F
s`
y o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
-+F
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
H a
00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 8
�9
j,3 p N M R to m N N en m m M
Q�
C m 50 r
C p o ] m
m 2 p a F o _ >
U)
N OLL C 2.tpac O
Q Z C F;.N N� ry l0 H
LL p o U
ZO Q U cwE6yis N
C7 m �c m� ❑
H ro va._m m Z
O ¢ N m °'w E ¢ >
Z o w v > c o
O a 0 > LL 0 w E n
_ a
Z N y O Z c ❑ a E Q
o Z O 0
�w w 0 _ _ ,rn
m w ° r m U, n a m
i N
W w ~ -wj H C ❑ Z U 0_
°a > ❑ N p 7 W Q C
it z o E O J a o
w O v¢ a w° o ¢ 0 } y
LL w r a ❑ ¢ , c °
LQ a Z F a 'or
z z ° m o
>
m c
W F LL W C m
-� w w m o ro w m c m o n
O Z -, o ° E v J J m o c v n
a'U) LL O a V y U C w O w m N o Q
u
a w w C a v `c rn = m ¢ � � E .o
N ❑J a c E c '•' m a rn a m = to •� o
C7 0 °o j ° rn Q y m Q r 'o m a c
F
C C IM
r >
m LL Y v m v v avi C V, Y O Y o+ y L a O
_ ¢ U)a N O •O ^O ? N to 0 m
.@ =
w U) F C F a to a Q r z to ~D o C a` v
EXHIBIT G-2: PROJECT FEE D&MINATION is Task 200 Summary
Perteet 9/25/2009
DIRECT SALARY COSTS(DSC)
Personnel Hours Rate Cost
1 Lead Planner 0 X $41.02 = $ -
2 Senior Planner 0 X $53.00 = $ -
3 Lead Technician 0 X $34.50 = $ -
4 Planner 1 0 X $22.52 = $ -
5 Planner II 0 X $31.20 = $ -
6 Senior Engineer(Design) 20 X $52.76 = $ 1,055
7 Engineer II (Design) 0 X $31.42 = $ -
8 Lead Tech(Design) 0 X $34.00 = $ -
9 Principal Surveyor 12 X $61.78 = $ 741
10 Sr. PLS/PM 20 X $45.67 = $ 913
12 Project Surveyor 72 X ' $33.00 = $ 2,376
13 CAD(Survey) 74 X $31.00 = $ 2,294
14 Survey Tech IV 58 X $30.35 = $ 1,760
15 Survey Tech 111 58 X $26.00 = $ 1,508
16 Survey Tech 11 2 X $20.00 = $ 40
17 Clerical 0 X $26.00 = $ -
Perteet Hours,TOTAL 316 Subtotal Direct Salary Costs(DSC)= $ 10,688
Salary Escalation(SE)37.5%of work after 4% Increase on 6/1/10=1.5% = $ 160
Subtotal (DSC+SE)= $ 10,849
Direct Salary Costs Multiplier(DSCM) 3.025
TOTAL SALARY COSTS (TSC)(DSC X DSCM)= $ 32,817
DIRECT NONSALARY COSTS(DNSC)
Mileage for Site Visits& Meetings 800 miles @ $ 0.550 $ 440
Courier&Postage 10 packages @ 20 $ 200
GPS Recievers 1 day @ 300 $ 300
Robotic EDM 7 days @ 100 $ 700
Digital Level 1 day @ 50 $ 50
APS locate $ 10,000
TOTAL REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES(DNSC)= $ 11,690
TOTAL FEE (TSC+DNSC)= $ 44,507
9-25-09 Perteet Fee Proposal.xls Page 3 of 7
m c
00
O N
y�j N
Ol~
d
d
m
a
y O
0 0 0 0 0 o e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y
N O O O O O O O O N O N O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
41 �
Z-
y� m
iZ
G
9
- r
aQ
0 0 0 o m m QQ o 0 000000a000 e e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N
c C
O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
i�
0 0 0 0 o QQ o 0 0000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N r
o e o 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 .Coco 00000 0 0 0 0 o e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
s`
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
o e o 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0000000000 o e m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
n 4
O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o
G. N
O r N
U O Z
O. L 0 Ot O.L C
5 O y
a N O U� ❑
Q mN t 900 Z �•
O� Olm O Q d
LL u
O a
cw.�=.Nti i O
N s Z o6 C
p mE v o N E w
C
Z y- V) Z u Z C ❑ U O Z K m � W
¢W
W O Z
C� ❑ O m Q N W 'o w o v Z
w C r w> � N w w � ❑ o E � 2 a
LL w x rw» a N c v w m m N a; c E
w Z m c v Q Q > a Z w d a a C o Z
U < h y v m Z -. Z �- o Z m ❑ W
z z W m o ] o n o m 4 w w w
C w u 0 O O 0 =� w o w = = w a > o >
o o a c = N a c - a 3 a c a m c ~ m c C O a 3 a w
ly
r Z N C C a S it
C h N
y o =', w Y C u = m E
—C Q W Q > > 4 W Q C O — O a 6 d Z N m v a d O Q O e
W N F O F d C m O. f O f O: u7 C7 F- m '� V F Q O m a` n` F ❑ U r
EXHIBIT G-2: PROJECT FEE DOMINATION Task 500 Summary
Perteet 9/25/2009
DIRECT SALARY COSTS(DSC)
Personnel Hours Rate Cost
1 Lead Planner 16 X $41.02 = $ 656
2 Senior Planner 164 X $53.00 = $ 8,692
3 Lead Technician 256 X $34.50 = $ 8,832
4 Planner 1 212 X $22.52 = $ 4,774
5 Planner II 60 X $31.20 = $ 1,872
6 Senior Engineer(Design) 44 X $52.76 = $ 2,321
7 Engineer II (Design) 84 X. $31.42 = $ 2,639
8 Lead Tech(Design) 52 X $34.00 = $ 1,768
9 Principal Surveyor 14 X $61.78 = $ 865
10 Sr.PLS/PM 22 X $45.67 = $ 1,005
12 Project Surveyor 72 X $33.00' = $ 2,376
13 CAD(Survey) 74 X $31.00 = $ 2,294
14 Survey Tech IV 82 X $30.35 = $ 2,489
15 Survey Tech III 82 X $26.00 = $ 2,132
16 Survey Tech 11 2 X $20.00 = $ 40
17 Clerical 16 X $26.00 = $ 416
Perteet Hours,TOTAL 1,252 Subtotal Direct Salary Costs(DSC)= $ 43,172
Salary Escalation(SE)100%of work after 4%Increase on 6/1/10=4.0%= $ 1,727
+50%of work after 4%Increase on 6/1/11 =2.0%= $ 863
Subtotal(DSC+SE)= $ 45,762
Direct Salary Costs Multiplier(DSCM) 3.025
TOTAL SALARY COSTS(TSC)(DSC X DSCM)= $ 138,430
DIRECT NONSALARY COSTS(DNSC)
Mileage for Site Visits&Meetings 800 miles @ $ 0.550 $ 440
Courier&Postage 10 packages @ 20 $ 200
GPS Recievers 1 day @ 300 $ 300
Robotic EDM 10 days @ 100 $ 1,000
Digital Level 1 day @ 50 $ 50
APS locate $ 15,000
TOTAL REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES(DNSC)= $ 16,990
TOTAL FEE (TSC +DNSC)= $ 155,420
9-25-09 Perteet Fee Proposal.xls Page 5 of 7
i
N t 0 O m N m m N O O V m m V m f D V m(D 0 0�f D m m(D O
�N N W7 r N Nr C =!.v m V M Om r M tD mNM
o a F-
00m Cl
N @ 31
d U �
m
CL
N O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O N O O O O O 0 0 0 O O
t°
m O O O O O O =000 O O O O O N Om O Cl)W 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 O O O O o O
N O o O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N W o CN, Va0 o o o o o o O 0 O o O 0 0 0 O O
m
ra
? p O O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 n O N O O O N O N N O O O O O O O O O O
9 r
s
N O O O O O o =000 N O O O O O O m N f D f O 0(D L O O N O O O O O 0 0 0 O O
pp ti r
u 5
m N N o O O O m V V O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O o 0 0 O O
N N r
N
v a o 0 0 o O vv o0 0 00000 0 o O o o o o 0 o 0 o 0 0 0 o O 000 0 0
N O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O v O O O N N N O O
10 N r r
o G
J V V O O O O O V O O V O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O m O O O m N CO O O
m N N r r
O
W
N O N O O O m V 0 V V v O O v 0 O 0000000000 O 'V O O O V N N O O
2�r
HWo
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0000 0 0 0 co m m o o o o o o o 0 o o o 0 0 0 0 0 000
0 0
m m m r M
9
N O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 N N 0 O�V O O O O O O O O O o O O O O O O 0 0 0 O O
N N N r
9
y w O O O O O O O O O O m m V O N 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O moo O O
n m In V m N
N
F
v v p o 0 0 o vovo 0 o-IT mom 0 0000000000 0 0 0 0 0 p00 0 0
mn
m V o 0 0 0 o V O V O N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T 2
1 0
3 r r N N N N M M M M M M
U O z m u@
Q
Q TtI!
B.0 U r T Tm OI QL C C j
t U N W@ C m Oi O m O O
oZ mV Nz2 mLVp m J
Y O
ti m m rn N m I f�v o❑w aim @d c rn
F=ig Z > ! U,? ��a c m� am
o - m o
w
Z Q @mac ouiE0w'O cocl
O Vmi C� > N to m 3 m U m C N m w
Z m a H d T L m m W N U
O Q v N C� vm � w ^'mE ❑ .mac
z F- ¢ w c a m e a > c ❑ c U
~ � U
Q U Z w c O m m. m V'
w w oz o ° a cif=� c
w ❑ U m !- @ @ Y w Q n
ul wm < N w a� Z z
w w > ❑z N i^ _c j N n w C7 o
a
❑ f- ¢ 0 Z o E ° r a s °' O z °' U
w 0 U m a p v c to ova w c
W Q a Q o d M
tLL- w Y U)ID Q vi c c U 5 vN °'
w a Q ra - a a @ c Z z o
n2 r' wz W m °o o a m m w
F- 2 -� O U E U J m N J N y O
IX w w U a` m m 00 0 o w > w
o ❑ a m v @ @ 0 a d N N m a Q @
N M Z Z
Z c C m O N L C @ T U UM')
m LL Y 2 Y aUi �' v oUi C - Y j Q o a m Y Q co y p1 E
1 r ❑ n
rn
m
° n
m o if f _
00 0 °
m r Y m
CL
m
r
a.
r O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
9
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
a>_
9
p9
4
u
s�
N
-e O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
6)qT
D y
O O O O O O O O O O O O N N O
Y G
�q
N
= O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
2
9
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
9
6
9 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
j
3
yX2 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
9
'
06 1� N MI C 10 r N to a r N
- 3
0
Z �-
Q E
z v
O a
Z J O c
it
p F N E
z t r m
O
O a m
m a ¢
� o
CL a °
a v z m A w
W W N c C c N O
O d d
x ° w E z
r w O N O . 0 W N
w a ? m m - m m 7d
o x r z a v ¢ w c
LL L ¢ y � m m m . Y 3 E a
r w Y a: z ai '� E m O c r
W Q Q rn Z m N O c ¢ w
r c �, m r m > „ c.)
'm ai 3 d x o w c a m
a w N
a a
w c° > a x v t E m w E
c a m u m N
ct:C�O '� o ¢ U ? m w Z m > Q o c c
= E O o m c c in 'E c c v v
En a h Y C y a E m E Y v v y `y `a
U.= Q o Q a a>i z m " m N a`mi p m m a a
x r v r Q o m a` c° a` o 0 a ii
w in
EXHIBIT G-2: PROJECT FEE RMINATION Task 200 Summary
Shannon and Wilson 9/25/2009
DIRECT SALARY COSTS (DSC)
Personnel Hours Rate Cost
1 Project Principal 208 X $7831 = $ 16,288
2 Senior Associate 26 X $46.00 = $ 1,196
3 Project Manager(Associate) 310 X $42.23 = $ 13,091
4 Principal Professional 60 X $34.06 = $ 2,044
5 Senior Professional 212 X $31.03 = $ 6,578
6 Professional 111/1V 0 X $31.00 = $ -
7 Professional 1/11 54 X $24.80 = $ 1,339
8 Senior Drafter/Lab Technician 10 X $27.44 = $ 274
9 Drafter/Technician 16 X $19.47 = $ 312
10 Administration 12 X $30.37 = $ 364
12 Clerical 15 X $24.70 = $ 371
Shannon and Wilson Hours,TOTAL 923 Subtotal Direct Salary Costs(DSC)= $ 41,858
Salary Escalation(SE) 100%0 of work after 4% Increase on 1/1/10 = 4.0% = $ 1,674
Subtotal(DSC +SE)= $ 43,532
Direct Salary Costs Multiplier(DSCM) 3.272
TOTAL SALARY COSTS (TSC) (DSC X DSCM)= $ 142,437
DIRECT NONSALARY COSTS (DNSC)
Mileage for Site Visits& Meetings 800 miles @ $ 0.55 $ 440
Parking for Meetings 2 each @ $ 15.00 $ 30
Drawing Reproduction(11 x17) 400 copy @ $ 0.20 $ 80
Color Copies(8.5x11) 150 copy @ $ 1.00 $ 150
Color Copies(11x17) 150 copy @ $ 2.00 $ 300
Courier& Postage 4 package @ $ 40.00 $ . 160
TOTAL REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES (DNSC) = $ 1,160
TOTAL FEE (TSC + DNSC) = $ 143,597
9-25-09 S&W Fee Proposal.xis Page 1 of 6
M M M Cl) N O V O M CO O 'e� to Co V' O CD O CO O CO N V' CD N O
C C m .� r� M d• N ry N N N r Co N N N Co CO
O O .ems+ r
N N (n
117 H O M O M O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C
U
N N r Co O M O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T r
C C
E
v
a
c O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 to O O CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N
s'c
m L
O y
H
c O O O O O O O 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O to
r r r
p d L U
C r C
Nn J L
O
Im
-e O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O CO CD CD to V 0 0 0 O O O O
c LO Lo r r
0
a`
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
m>
c a
a`
N O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 Co O O Co O O O O O O CD CD N CO N O (D
°a N r r r r r
c n
m n
a`
O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O O N O O O 0 0 O O O O Co n7
y o CD
a`
a
N Co O N CD to W N N N N Co N 0 to N CA N N N Q V CO OD CD O
` r N Cl) r r T N
o c
a�a
to O O O O O .a C' O O O O N O O N 0 0 0 O O CO V N O O d' V
c e N
c c
Co O O O O to O aD N c} 7 v '7 N O N 'It O N 0 0 '7 V R Co CO CO CD
m ° O CO r N r Co to
o N
a a`
_a
> 3 G r N M of O O r N M
r r r N N N
U Q z N N N N N N N N N
Q
'0 N E O N N (6 N a) N N C o 0
o 0 C a�E o c r rn--' L— c � a� E `o
a° Ca E n C p c >o °- > ° N ro E m
c a . C o O > o m E m a�
Co 0 W M -0 C E E Z c (D c o a>i
J ° o o 5 m o vQ " Cc (L 6
z c °E> .° ° 5 Nm m` o o � o E s
s m a 0 c c m o -
tL U _ N Cn U O a1 'p O (� �O COj N ` a7
N C Cn m C z m (a p C
E 0
OLL ° a E O °O E D ° ti _Q� U c a O
Z NF d 4 � U p o o � J U o (j ° Co
O o oM F m e °' o E m c 0
W @ C O
z a a' m ` W a' U O E �. (n U O — O
En U ( (n z oO Co a N y ° 'N a °
E c -0 0
J w
LL LL z c Cn ❑ L w a Q a y 0 o E m
z 0 o z z c E a o °> m c E n
z 0 O v to 4 o a
-�°a � E° Q m w mU) 3 C`aa > ma
Z LUm W E M m W m �
O F- m C ❑ ° �. a) O
W y U
Z O F O
z ❑ to 0 W
w = a m O z c c o c W x w a` v Cu
o n Y H n d ° Q O } a) _ti E
2 Cr) U- U ❑ D N 'D U th O� C O O
w 0 Q Z Q H c D Q ° @ a
IL LL ~ M F- F N 'O C Z O C N O
C N @ CC
U r- W W p> ° y y y W U c Co p
Q Z Z °
o tL O a V U @ w o
a w O ❑ d m a X v> Ca
z m = `m 3 w Co
0 O 00 z O (n tm N N Q N y •� O I— U
(D O Cv Z N C C O O a>
t m O v O o > aU 3 m
Y Y m U
ma aw a o o -13 o a _� 7 CD o
w Cn ❑ a 5 v> a C5 H c (n C) ii W U
°a O O N O N O' V O N M tD O •
C C y M N r- M N M M�1` M r r r r r r r r r r
0 0 �
C N
C — O
s
O N (n D
O- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O, O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O
N N _ O
r a
as Q
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O O 0 0
E
v
Q
'p O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
a e
L
O p
H
n O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
c n L c
J L
fn O p
H
O O O O O O 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O 0
0
`o
a`
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 o O o 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0
0
n Z
n�
.0
0
d
O O O co 7 •d• to (D N v tD O 7 O O 't O O O O O O O O -
0 o O cD — r r N r N N
.0 „ T
N 0
a`
O to N co V O O O O to O O It O O t} O O O O O O O O
yo M r r
L o
a c
a`
m (D tD N O N c0 N N �' tD t7D O N O O N O O O O O O O O
mm9 O r N T r r r r r
O C N
°-tea
0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O
N q
V co CO O N O O 00 V to It O to O O c0 O O O O O O O O
S c
a a
w
'j tm C r N co v r N CO � to r N N
>+ co M M M 'V of sY `7 tf) to tD to
V Z N N N N N N N N N N N N N
N N w = C w N
C C N tT m C
w n0 U 3 N w y
E ` w m E
O N w
O C co LLLi> � O Z
0) Z ..
° (o w 3 (n z
c 2 cu c ro c ¢ E
0 0
° c _ N o ° O fi cp
Z v fn (Nit m w N c ti Z �d
c m E E fn _
p C p c Q a`) w LL c o cn E w cn
0 w Z a cfl o T � •m O p m a ¢
U) U w ¢ y �o o m c U 0 v
c
w e Z o 0 0 o o Z to U)i
z p c - c ._ w LL W C7 _ m ul
°- Z L) W mNacitoa ° fn o d `o O
~ a w c d m E E ' ¢
z Z > Z a(n n c y y w In cn
Z ~ O C7 LL o fn `-° to w z
w Q Q m W 0 � a m a ¢ w c
W x Y � } � C O m } U. m rn 2 N E fl
n m E y 06 Y
U w r c z m o o ? O) z m N w Q ° W
w °- 0 '� y c cc m o I- is > U w
[ Z m E m 3 3 3 o w w
-wi to �W m W :; :°. W a >a, o w •5 = 0 aW C E
O h w 4 In 0 H L 'a>i w 'a o m ,N
M w LL M o LL cn c m (n w O Q 3 M a w it, ix
N� O N w O ¢ U a LL r +'' r(n m LO O C O C C
F= N O. E L N 0 Oa fn C Z C N C N U U
m Y d o - in Y tY y LL E m E
ta_ fn L - C !n fl > e
In m cn O
N d d
° m X w to m M v
EXHIBIT G-2:PROJECT FEE DETETION • Task 500 Summary
Shannon and Wilson 9/25/2009
DIRECT SALARY COSTS(DSC)
Personnel Hours Rate Cost
1 Project Principal 98 X $78.31 = $ 7,674
2 Senior Associate 14 X $46.00 = $ 644
3 Project Manager(Associate) 216 X $42.23 = $ 9,122
4 Principal Professional 36 X $34.06 = .$ 1,226
5 Senior Professional 102 X 531.03 = $ 3,165
6 Professional 111/1V 122 X $31.00 = $ 3,782
7 Professional 1/11 114 X 524.80 = $ 2,827
8 Senior Drafter/Lab Technician 22 X 527.44 = $ 604
9 Drafter/Technician 16 X $19.47 = $ 312
10 Administration 15 X $30.37 = $ 456
12 Clerical 14 X 524.70 = $ 346
Shannon and Wilson Hours,TOTAL 769 Subtotal Direct Salary Costs(DSC)= $ 30,157
Salary Escalation(SE)100%of work after 4%Increase on VIM 0=4.0% = $ 1,206
Subtotal(DSC+SE)= $ 31,363
Direct Salary Costs Multiplier(DSCM) 3.272
TOTAL SALARY COSTS(TSC)(DSC X DSCM)= $ 102,621
DIRECT NONSALARY COSTS(DNSC)
Mileage for Site Visits&Meetings 800 miles @ $ 0.55 $ 440
Parking for Meetings 2 each @ $ 15.00 $ 30
Drawing Reproduction(11x17) 400 copy @ $ 0.20 $ 80
Color Copies(8.5x11) 150 copy @ $ 1.00 $ 150
Color Copies(11x17) 150 copy @ $ 2.00 $ 300
Courier&Postage 4 package @ $ 40.00 $ 160
SHANNON& WILSONS,INC.LABORATORY SERVICES
Sample Receiving/Handling 14 box @ $ 7.00 $ 98
Water Content Determination 148 each @ $ 15.00 $ 2,220
Grain Size Distribution 12 test @ $ 125.00 $ 1,500
Fines Content 8 test @ $ 75.00 $ 600
Atterberg Limits 8 test @ $ 165.00 $ 1,320
One-dimensional Consolidation Tests 2 test @ $ 580.00 $ 1,160
Consolidated-Undrained Triaxial Compression Tr 2 test @ $ 2,200.00 $ 4,400
DRILLING SUBCONTRACT
Mobilization/Demobilization 1 lump sum $ 500.00 $ 500
Daily Travel 9 days @ $ 150.00 $ 1,350
Air Knife Vacuum Excavation 16 hours @ $ 225.00 $ 3,600
Drilling(0 to 50 feet) 300 feet @ $ 18.00 $ 5,400
Drilling(50 to 100 feet) 180 feet @ $ 20.00 $ 3,600
Drilling(50 to 150 feet) 100 feet @ $ 24.00 $ 2,400
Drilling(beyond 150 feet) 40 feet @ $ 29.00 $ 1,160
Extra Representative Samples 24 each @ $ 26.00 $ 624
Shelby Tube Samples 12 each @ $ 31.00 $ 372
Borehole Backfilling and Patching 620 feet @ $ 8.00 $ 4,960
IDW Disposal 7.5 ton @ $ 750.00 $ 5,625
Hourly Charges 8 hours @ $ 200.00 $ 1,600
Decon Unit 9 days @ $ 195.00 $ 1,755
Washington Department of Ecology Permits 1 lump sum $ 150.00 $ 150
TOTAL REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES(DNSC)= $ 45,554
TOTAL FEE (TSC+DNSC)= $ 148,175
9-25-09 S&W Fee Proposal.xls Page 4 of 6
� s
m o fD
o° o
N Y 1[1
N (U
O H N
3 a
m
N
O tl] m Q N N N N Q CO (D(D O (O d' O CO O m(D N N (O CO Q O (D co W (D O O
C C y (O N r Q m Q N m(3)N r r N N Q N N N Q N r r
O O r
c y m
� 3 H
L
O
Q Q O Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O =00 O O O 04 " o 0 0 0 O O 000
3 r r r
U
(n N r O O Q O O O O O O O O O O O 000 0 0 0 O O O O O O cc O O O
E
:3 (O O O O O O O O O O O O (D O O O (O 000 coo O Q Q O O O O O O O O
o m
F
N O O O O O O 00000 N O O O N coo O O O 00 O m O O O 0 0 000
N N N
h p`
1-
g Q O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 Q O N O N O 0 O O O O O Q .D O O O O N O O O
i
N O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O N Too O cDO O moo O O O O O O O O
N N N r m
a`
g N O O O co O O 00000 co O O O co ON 00 O 0 c O OO O OO 00 N v
O f0 D r
r
-g O O O O O O 00000 N O O O N 000 C O O O C) a O O O O O O N N
n.4
a`
a
to w N O Q N (D �O N N N Q O N O N N Q Q cD Q O Q v O N Q c0 GD CD N N Q
`a 9 I
4�
y r Q O O o o O Q Q 0 0 0 O O O O O O O Q O O N O O O 0 0 0 O O O O N
o"J r r
w�
w (O O O O to (O Q N Q Q Q N. O N O O O O Q O N N Cl Q Q Q O N 0 Cl N N N
O) Q r N r Q Q
sa
_a
fn N
Q
C r y N y y 'T y y (6 y y C
d O.c0 O m E O C(mn O O m O C N C N , E O
O
.°a
m O 'E rn O c Uc c c w o F O U o(w 0 w O o m o Z E m o
a oo c
a a>m f
LL =
O N
o Z co:?
° n v O O n y m
0 v z z IL Q _U
O a p
c—
Q a y o o m m � m w �� m C.
U o c 2 F m m m
z a' 2 > U m- m ? aci Er 0 6 E (c o m
G
w w ?m y y m
w E
3 `w E w LL
00 o z o w an d A m a N > d
wy w
O O y o z y > o
E z w w
w O Z c
Q } a° C w a E o N
c o c Q y o y o ° o
c Z t U o a°i
a m
to m m
U Q Z z w °) O " m W rna -C3
U y ❑
(�O O LL
U m U W ° m G m
O f. w U a. C O1 L m y — G y G •y C1 a' U
m L
o m a v m o m o
2m -
6 O O Z O V) 0) G Q N (n 'O
m LL Y Y v v m E Y o m w W E w
t(d` Q W Q 0 > •� m Q 10 F. w
w v~i /- ❑ F- a C O d 2 O F- H a' (/) U' (n O �L U
00
o�
N Y
N f
N
O m 0 m M N N
O O
C _N �
N 3 0
t
O C N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
Y
U
EO O o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
s�
E
a
3 O m N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
o m
O v N o O o O O O o O o O o 0 o O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0
G�
H
O'O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
P_
e S
n`
` 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
a`
2 o m v m o 0 0 o m o o o o 0 0 0 C. 0 0 0 0 0 0
c2 r r
p g m v 0 m o 0 0 o m o o a o o v o 0 0 0 0 C. 0 0 0 0
as r
@ �
a�
m N N OD m 0 O O
O O m O o m O O m O O O O O O O O O
e�
e D N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
`E 3
%� d
_ N m N v o O O o V o o m O o m O o 0 0 o O o O o O
r
u O M M M M M M M w if a O v m m m m m m
O O Z m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m
Q
0
E N
C
E a E h
>a E m
aU o m
U Z Z
C, Q
c
3 � •- Z
O a
o o
Z rn
E(� O 0 Q J p C
z O m to z aS
O W c
C&p r ❑ m IN- E W
F '" o O � F-
a ° a o C a a Q
0 Et u o ° a Q OU a 0
-+ m m m C7 z
a 3 p Y c N` V W 2 c .z O p O o s v w O
E E
zo> z V) E o d m m N
z E U 0 � m m n m z
w m z a-
< a v a w
wy y $ c } _ } Ir m m 3 E a
o wo Q a o Q m Q a Ir H d _U m O c z
w LL C Z O En Z (/1 0 O Q O W
U) �- m >
_ m Y c c
w a J O N J a D v N w ° w N w y, E
o� c w N w m w d F = > F J E N a E
a w �' (L ¢ m Ir c a m c m U) a O 3 > 'm c°.� a w
c a c a c Y o < o Z 2 Q a > u�
C7 O o -°% m N m ` j a K C ,°n C C C cn m aci oci
v 3 m p
LL Y Q o u v E m Y w E E Y
m LL m >- o a > C e m " o s c w a a
x N D ~ m U r Q O a r°n a rQ- D U a U- rQ-
w N