Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA88-125
MIN ... The Casey Group mom Architects TACO TIME OFFICE BUILDING 10116 36th Ave. Ct. SW, Suite 203, Tacoma, WA 98499 • (206) 584-5207 WINDOW WALL METAL ROOF .. ...7.' -.: . • fa, • !':*';A• . .. ..o.... .;4•, •••• 16' • <„ ,•. ., .....„ .414i4".•:' 4-* a,..• -..•-•.•o•Ii•. • •• !!•0 AI* '1111 '•!.o... •°• 4 s'a '••'.. 0.0 4.° • ii. ••lw mdin• 't . 0'..907.41,1%,.•417.7•00.0:44)4f\O..';At,. ..4..;7:ill"...o'.•. 1). 6.••rxiivA I I 11.I I h.4:....4,;r , ',...:° . 4 5: 01,...,0• 0 4 ° i•''. * -**!'.i••••• • a 4'0•**. 40/4' ,,, , '.° •..0 1,1..•. 'a?•WV, . .,!: 0..'•• ....; .„„ ' •.0.„0 it',41 4 0 Pt•• 9 * ••.6 6,• • • ,rap ,..... . ,•.... ,..„.... ., • -....: ....... . . i. .:„..., . ..,.._••,,,.• .... ...... . _.._.Wu . i '.t V°.41'44%.7i7''Ia' 4° . 1;**:* .•' • * S . • J CV:,t -' •.c4•1•00 6;6.016 f? 00,. . CI".;:°-••• . • 4 00. -0•:',04 o•o...., O —00 •;*.••glii' • CEDAR SIDING •.... • %or 0,• tt,,o wa./,...,0 0 . :o• . •••0 .-.4.7•31"•;1%,;,*••W'4.1.. -4 A N':ooroo 4 6.. . ' 00 4 =*.•4,‘• •••.1%, • 4o. '''. * .. .416 4. 11;.. •• . ..:41 t '' • '•• 0'4, •`.v.04, ...A.& , 4, • ••..0. :', . ' •' °'6 4.;,.0.•,":0-,*!'',1:..4*11/*;'4'I1•iS•••.•0-•i,•: 4• •4'. BRICK .. •'. • ..• , ," • .. • • 4 ••Qb a ''•••,ir a...*A :•; ..,,,,tr . . , . • ',... .. , t? s•.r-••coif,* "I* , 41 * ,0 4;44.!".',i.VP* tn.'• *,•• WO' .`4.,!. • •.V .....°14 41(41. T•4 f 406"...0".. 0 ° 9 CV" 3.0 .114 • .4tZ.•4 * • •, . • • .."O. • . . ••• , _. ,.'",i, ...4 V_ .-. ••• • '..e• , 4.. •e;•a••• •*a, Vb. \ 't. ...Ok a y-. • *4;6 siois.i. .• 4,• •- • ‘ 4••••4it o;„`• .. .., .• :. '':'..4 ' . • ... ' ' -'• .. . •'IS'.'t - ..' t •, . . • et O•. ''''.. s ' ;';';"Plieli. . 4 3 ''• %,-•• ..‘..* .....,lo, i',....0'•.... 4. S * **Lit i' '.it'A,:i:;'-','F'' •••••,7•-•.r. , . '..r., ,,t,• r .,.-..., .,•••:, '''' ' '' '' .44' 4.). ,.'". ,11., rry.,"' ..-04't -v"... ‘•,••:.'4P :9 •', ,' 0. • . - :1,,•.. ,t1,.••,1' • ‘ : •, •- • • ' o'4.1 •... . •;,. . 1.' .i •,, ,,,„, '• .•,,, , .0% -.••• ,:, •••'.•4 '' .,, ' :' ..• -•,•,-,,v .; 0`-'! %••• • . , , . . • ,.. . , . . • •:, ' ' -• . ' •,; - .. • , .:,.`te ,,,r.•• .t., ''',:. r ' •— , .f'14'I.7•`+:44n la %., ....• ...°04o ,.4. . •.; f. ,,,,,,. , § Atte . ..7 . , -, 7ab.,' .111 " :', 4 04 , 4' ..., • ; tisk..1 , ',.• kt v°• k ..•,. o:s toi -o.•• " ro,•• • :' • it • 4 0 • , °41,• " ' A lik ,t: .., • 4`5.•ek"it,\ . , , ' •Fr•`i.". ••. ..! it,•/. ,"litit ..., . i • '.., • A •;•- c :,k• ,c ''Re#. *II y t• ,' , r . _ i''',.i^ P.',1 ... • ,.. , ''',.' 'I, • ,•%0• „'.9r.'.'"). • 4... , -.0.-."..1.&r.,....N.4:-..A., • i'l •`P;`,.,1'.• • - - • '1,.' ' •fi so '1",'' • • .. -S '..'s • .!: Ivq,,,Iv,:#••• '74 • V. t''.•'...."‘ ' k.-." /..,;., ,,, .r.. 4-...,,,,.• AN. r 7', , ,,i.. ,;.,, .4.,.,c, , ,,, ,...,/, .,. , ...;*'*1:, r ':,4..,'%•.> , . ',) ,;,- •. %A*7-7 4.' ''' STATISTICS / NARRATIVE STATEMENT ', i •; Z I THE PROPOSED PROJECT WASHINGTON STATE TACO PORTION OF THIS DEVELOPMENTNW.«.o CORPORATE CORPORATE ' ZI ACCOUNT!.OFFICES. DEVELOPMENT WILL BE USED TO STORE SOME FT*»=GPPORTON OF m Y \ / — RESTAURANTS. NO OUTSIDE TORAGE IS PLANNED. A SPRING 1909 CONSTRUCTION START IS SCHEDULED FOR s DEVELOPMENT. THE CONSTRUCTION DURATION Is \, C tD-K LLicR>u\ , ESTIMATED STATISTICS, BE a MONTHS. \ `� Ifi N�. /5sLAIJP'a'>FE,-. n\ y 'Ty d xe,4 hv.iv feuce SITE AREA, . e sD.FT. 1 'RI I U 5 4 N8G'55'GO"W I I 4' 2°F12 ZONING, S1 gym- I\ yI �5 \_-_ —__-___ sTORRGE GD,LDINO, 1 930 G F G905G "` �'LDI IA ' ■ S. D. EGA DESCRIPTION: MAP ENDDD.x BLOCK a LOT 9 1L I\ G ; : BUILDING AREAS, 9 S P.GRD S �\ mli ;? AryP IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE, Ixax GE aE1GCDiaDEas ITEI El n. `5oy / — AIIELoso�T' t •", WALL✓MIMED TROADS,DTaL E zD 9n G F u�, al I i' ,'t' ..'C5L O STORAGE •BUILDING — G, 784 \xE o T-2I I 1 ��)\\ \`/ w,01.052 m /` PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING: -PROVIDED: G 9DD G E I z,129 G.F. �\ —J \\ / �' �� R REWIRED,1 DDI.9.G S.F. OFFICE NET AREA, r PARKING REWIRED, AND STAIN aNGASI ONN2OOR, Gzz s.F.noo z9.0 b i e• ' I �-� \i 8 STORAGE B,I,LD,NG, 1.Go s.E,i1D h� LOWJP ;_ Y I if _ z n5 'a' — I )15/ 1 r''' ' /I )1- ':" • , 40/ , f ,,.h �i%n:Am +' o .dam. L g a • \ � M iyu o II 1/;` Po�E a� OFFICE a�g D (y 'f`^ BUILDIN �F2 , i 1 '9A�.F'iJ 555 s VICINITY MAP �_.F _ICI Rom\ ,, /I \ J / W t d � ," m % \ n j \ \ 0 rao a _ =f_j / .... -- IIIMMI Ma la•� Y+ �"✓ \ uv»v�EvrchT � 'T 6n J \\ I I a � �5 e'auoxa ��� may\ �- o I e til�jj RAJFPBR ._ M \1 d e ! 2 IXIhT: \ \ 1 I POLE LIGHT SITE PLAN �ApT - \\ \ r O, II F S MAPLE VALLCY 111GlIW.NT 6R IG7 _ 4F Vq Co,��\_ \I aI-VflF 1 Gyh - \ "\ ',..-- %----,,.......1„....%, Cr) 8 riiiik04111. %.:11.1.1"7_ '''-- '!..T1 I -- .11 yews1 10..9.4__Ta_ , 1 O - 13 4• .1. NFL \. 5. II i FENCE ELEVATION 1 T h a Casey C BOO 1 1 A°,mhRs©�a Architecture and Planning E i] • . -, / / ........ ,..-:::(:...../•;:•.••• / •,t• / /0 \\ 52 0 IW 2. • \\ '' .-''''-- \.,\ 1!TI I..)-{ ...!L:C65.0Y 0,70 r. v.MfTIC J.WO g awn:yr I 3(.•;1••: .':':';\ 1 . . C/3 0 76 • In 0/85 - 1gM - r 1 14' - ! i..,„-.:‘-: i ',. - -'-7 r-----;------_, • --. . 1-.. .1-, c, .). ', ,,, • __ •••,• _ _ . 7-...,..-„ .i FF.63.0 1. STORAGE BUILDING • 8 i• . .• SCALE:r=2o. ::-I. 4,, -.L. , , ----,---..,i „'..t / , 7 & - . . z, a '-'' -. •l' i I " i • _ . / ,-, • . ' / . L.55 -•'' 1 Li-...L.S 411111111P- -'----__ - ''.. 111 --I. , --' . L,.. ,,,,,„,,njtill, 1 1.7 1 1 tfq°555" .....::,-..',.."......,•/ . 11111149".,de a• FiPC. ., ,,-t. 1 V . , ; Px 71i: -',.- r„.,-'• / /. / ' " . "-;1-e......-2.. /i :'--,' r '4" • -,•/ %, • : a ., ,-,,-.,...- .- - g I'' i---..-7-..-, -1-: / r/ . - FF.454.0,- .......„vz .• 4 0 - - ".-. ...... .. . .. .7- ,./.00930/Y '-•--. • •--—-- . ' 1 '3 0300 sP : : 3 .. • .0f. . . ' a ' ?TO. e, , • 2. I I; 1 , I a I . '8 rA I il . . . ''''''': •.... 1..4.0U4X . .......w.04- ,\ • //- !'.-: : 651 • , '1 0 3 •• -'...-L . E t. 2 , . 0 1 -*1111413UILDINO. UL FT. 1 "g F. 1 ii. i, • v. ,.,.--?\/-47- - I ,.„. .o.st,v4ittrL L. ,L. ' ',...„,..• • . AS.., ''''''.•-•:.:::',4‘.0\ie ogt4ea.. : ,''' ,. -. ,,ifill"--.'•-''.;.:,:.-,„ . ''1------_______r`‹ - . ' \ °:' J0208055011 44 ie .• 4,4_.-r.i - :,..47--.- :-..,:::-:, ,,,,„ -., •.._ PROJECT NO • ..--,..., , 0..,, . ii, • \ / I1 DRAWN BY . \> TLW ' PO:I,'••..-‘ '''V, ,'',";,‘",,,;,, . ,.. . 1 MBUE OAXE . ' LEGEND . , , I . 2 ... .... ,.,- PPOTATY M ... it LATEST REV • ---,-:'r--•- DUSTING P/003.11Y 0311TALLIT . • ---/„..-',•- 015111G cormom ' .--ca-g- nruszo max -1 .• Nu STOW PUT/TYPCI CO=COM S 51WW1 PIPE/Mtn COMOTLUOLL ------• Tall WWII --.44 N0.1 FIPIC LIWALIUT '':', $",,,,:, tieLl 55 5IDt.53WCE ' ' p'ACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY cpN .741rM742142-,ArTip 8 . \ 1 . ' IIII 1 s_ � gill tS;t,'' F caws) y I fill 11111�ILI 1� 1 Hax • .a n WEST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION .b..ibu Ye"-Il.d. i i g /Kern.RL1cF OWE)OWE) . 1111111111111111111 1 I I ilhi . • -tom" s �',�., —IIul1uIIiU1111_1114III_:_ x o < ems`--.. _ _ • ( n'• SI_ —_ o t-1-0.11M,l':' •'1- ,i.- 1__..--, ›. v. ,.:1 C- -#1011F-liilr E7 c EAST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION r: n re,i'04 Yen.Iloli C 2 3 8 �„s I Ea -- - it _ i 7 rhi a Casey group A°- Cr©G1 Hf©©aa Architecture and Planning p 3 Lynn Willia.m Horn&Associates p 111,..0CM.•...h..erra..."..•006,40....10, / Pea,..11,01.00000,a../.6c,/, / / . R....989.0"/•T.,......1............•(1.06)5.02-600.4 .. KIM=,.., - 2,,,:wo....T.,...r•tmoc.. ,.. IM01411 MO.410,....„,„ ...„ / ( , 0 • ' Z 2:1 .1. 0...A, Z. '1'1:0/51'41'02.0.>'...,. ' • ','01111. in , •I psel•ve- P AK.-.1....$0,...71%,...6 \ \ .in -0/1\i. l'Ite .. , i ,,._..„ ,,,,_.":-...1r../.110..014.o..•..ta,MYtiint.1,6.11.71,re:7!qtr.III ,,,7 . =rws"*rtiar..' ..\''t 1 . '50,;,4,c, 51 ' • ir V 10,, . , tr. eit,', t :' • ii (...` A,V) • .L. 110 ' P.K 1,-i= 5' a+sue.M.AcITH.MAIL- g N•44.0,. ‘% " .... ft". ' 'ip.6..' .--,1„,..,.....,..• . •.rtr%V...., e . ,......1.t..1.1../TE 5,-3b•.#7.;caner ,I IMAI!...7.A1041,.. i',i il LI.OL''''''. STORAGE BUILDING , , - ' asizzl,?;4-":,... 41. -c. _,,,._ , A 1/-Allau-ryS ,-- . - ee."7: — r't:I IINM•:; ''''.'t.1..,.., ...1.4.4,.. ---,/-'-, c-c.”..s •••e - •c•ef 111r£R,C,..1 CAL•11,,,,, / i --ii.i'r---'--- /-''-'-'-'' vtme>vt,..tox -"73.'46.7. '>,‹alt. grz.ei, r.f,7,,it"O.C,A sPAce \ ''''1 1 i 4,-forVikre.C..,ASIU.E :I , lha „....14..".74..t.. t • I V I I .,•'' \ ID __...---,,,---:•-••+'••••000:e•Ir%:".CA'...-.IGI 1 .1T-siivoeoeuo,e44 • ,....-;....rrsauX/MM• -• , ., .4( ,WIALAfte ..-e• - I ..6•A —---r 4.66.1•016.i. I -.7j,1 i /''''''''M'''''..... 1..11j. eg.,e,ce•Jc %I eeZ7•45 tit i EW 1 pH.1,...t. '''S 41 gal——--Iri..----4..--,;.vi. I l'"T. --- If*, J1-4;;•4.„,E, 7o-PR..s CAL,f.e,CeMASu•S/ , •eq--ro Luyke,' 1 arq Vil - if , Tiatti '-'''''elot el,..' -. w‘ !4-.1:1 VI.41006.....RAP Yee, ,..10/00•1_??0,01:7 =orrf.14.7 /1r-2/•Sf•K‘t.::,,,itt,,,,,5 ,c,,/ -'-'7,.....„./I itli yi., _____I _x„. i.- 111 „Imo 1,‘„If:,,,, ,2.,,, ,T;,,. „.. k..; . . vt,,,,x„., ,,-......................... ,3.E, 01-3 ore.' AA,TO.7-Arnea-ot U44.0.1 1 .' -r c5. ,,dje=Acce-,.••• • 11.__,1„; , E' Illik. / 0'r =tee rfcrs,Wee,A sp....M / I it•11).; / •••',Wc•vAR,e-r, sac litiig,\ 4.- r.) Npr- . - Q2.01.1 zwlx.R.N....7,0 4/ 1 - i••*1 P.! —2'.C.,9i9' ''''''' 0.-"' w) ,... ,6', 114111 roollx., Top.,1..Y.I.M.• .2• ba...- , il"- tz. : ,,,......,. • --k--_,,., .....-1.,: Si1_-,, __ ..Ye. cotamor 01....0 M0100, '-',...‹,„„..7,5 1.....IF.W..,<q13, tier 0 L'.00,0,01‘.A.4.4.••/4 ,.,,,,_.— li°1 .„ . lird"411.1. • .2...,,,,,,,,, ...0' ., re="rime 51•054Teies.191AK.e.e.verAIL. ...,,f'6AR •,.....,.,,,,,, ;,;',1", t:AO-11 4...,,,c,•,..42,..c ',44.4, 0 ) • 0 4\'''''"''''"'i \i'Pl-----,..''''"' 4;gt-7(%, ''',"•,..4, 0,..c.'74,.[ OFFICE 0 11 . F.,..-w. .ratirr.n.zg.t4.3574.... .,''''' \R\ 1„41ttltt...3.01) 1 V" ti• 4t.m.xxx-om 1-9....d 74,-SeIf7;coar \%\‘' . I 4 /6- 6_.•47.• i .... , ,.....„.... ,....:„,, : ,,,,,...m. d me orrAPtinoS u.-olre$ 1/4111...P.',6'-`-, • .•' ..A.,„„ 111,14,5.1..1 TAP ar.Lowl 1 Notes E ..._.. --........,......„ ,•,,,„.7-4,/.-..c.,...erAcc ..*Alirr ; .e.s, .6-...... 1“1.-.549. ,Canrr . .•..Oa"Kr.9egr,VAIDEMEAMO. . •.......,....Als,..4:6',9,, it I. 0', e-l'I'Lrif,..0, C n ..,.41-'l•ALL. 1 ..1 ")•Sel>4.,p,s("1.,Lu ,,.r .1•IL.•ti- '''•..1.:.',..', .114:44* ° : i "..,...'.: ,... li) if-r'H-6,4477. .:•... ...' •" . ....,0,''''''''°'''''-v d.11: g p e...vo.p...1...r7 Turp , ,, ./\1.....• \ • • 43, - It ,4 A-r LI- fecr2c5. r,r,TJL4.• 11-1-ro &..,'PeEl'tzr SUI3C.,1 4.,,...P.,61.2T ..,11..4,cf244-r.,..ic.., 1.0,r Lse -5,44. RE.,ve f.,c1.<,-,'2'41 i LATecer. '..9 b".ti-',',e)•.. '' le i i i t,,,i.,„,..0,....„. ---,.,, .,.... 4 e" riT F..1 ..ti-s. ----, •,.„,.. •71,.: e.I.,..t..b.-6,,,,......„ 4„ .... --7-,...•., . v :. . . 5 riber5 eXii.46, -frze .3. ,.....„....„...'...„:.;•'-":.,,, --.."---,014:4:0: .7 ./ •.':,.lo,,J I, .i. ruw-r pRic.."TerD. se. s.r. 16,..1-16,--1 t9.4.-1- ••4 ie ! . . . . . 4f.q, ..2 4';,'..'.---'. '. ' .‹,., •.. •."v'eL. ../t . _ ii . 44-P44 4,er•• °4-''''' :'''.."4" . --->--.1t.'1 . AC&I.-IW5••• '''••,.. .,..,.... ..''.-•''•••<•-........., ..m vg-A-.64-r_e --,-,...„ ---,..-.1.:.••... .-. ›..„..42, ,• '"-, ' .,.......'.:•.•,•:.•!.....0 Z • :(-5,1,tem Al, 'i..,.....'. ••::,11 ,,,,.....y/ % .. ...-... :. 1-. , ..,......., i.fi., rAF.,,,4 g" , 1 . Preliminary ki '••, .-.4.,1,/ 4 !:.' .....i Landscape Planting Plan ED '"---"''''.----.-----\ ..„.......„ ---. --...„ -,.., .......„ • . 13tX,I SE•Crlag-,yriaal- `,..‹.--.. • . .....'''',..,...„....,...,..,„ • "-----....„.....„... • i . i . 7hs Casey aroup Arrchn'ascs Architecture and Planning LT 1I rnfAuvluv yeo.rl j r L P CG�.ue>1 e I- - �rsr in0 hfAL91uq sGn, " }.w.. � — - maMSEMI rierM.RNF GLE71 ' uaRu eval.la eref. 111 _ 11111�14 .�IIIIQ�F'; }: 9111ia9'Is �01'1 a SII L M"11."1�'. 2 — Eif. .�"' F `.ice..T>:"IT ,.._ +.► L '..4h 1.'6• j, iAti”Oif:iqa FRONT ELEVATION STORAGE BUILDING FRONT ELEVATION OFFICE BUILDING LM' I^G /) - Ye-ILou $L es4M.11Ca...oii 1IL Ye.-Itp+ fiVit ELLN TGI..1 tIML414 R Pooectu1PHEi1r -Ail _ MillI I oGFIW OFFICE i, S lOrdeSPROMIEFIOrdiMagiCerafflidgrAMIZI 9mR ge .BE I afGICE ofE orrice. >R. - o III 1 I Il i BLDG. SECTION BLDG. SECTION W a osy�y3 m I S gsi1 F ° sF...ton4G ..a e.,cur*cewe) 'ill 1 1 III .!� .J • .. 8 = ?-) , =- C w.+mw�16. 1tEfl _ .3 z .- yrsr�.c�"S" 19r;h xw/ga j I NORTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION Ie•-I'-' b°-I'-an I _______ - _- the Casey greUp, A°,TchEs©fs Architecture and Planning G°2 ' CITY k),F RENTON Finance Department Earl Clymer, Mayor February 7 , 1990 Paul Casey 10116 36th Avenue Ct. S .W. #203 Tacoma, WA 98499 RE: Site Approval SA-125-88 , Restrictive Covenants Dear Mr. Casey: Enclosed is a copy of your Declaration of Restrictive Covenants recorded under King County Auditor's number 8910260229 . If we can be of further assistance in this matter, please feel free to call. Sincerely, 717M;-e Manly J Petersen, CMC City Clerk Office of the City Clerk - 235-2501 cc: John Dobson Planning - Current Public Works Enclosure 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 Allik4 ' • SA-125$8 RESTRICTIVE COVENANT ' WHEREAS, John W. Dobson, as owner in his separate right and Accord, Incorporated as lessee under lease agreement dated October 4, 19881, o ril covering the following described property to wit: (:-‹ r_, Lot 9, Block 6, Maplewood Division no. 2, according ,,, . P to r,�� -;. u the plat recorded in Volume 39 of plats, page 39, in King '". .- County, Washington, except that portion described as AM .:', Y 7.7: follows: vi. Y1: }-S cr�s Mc.4 Beginning at the most westerly corner of Lot 1, Block 6; �: = then south 61.°09'15" east 50 feet; thence south 9°55' west `c;n .. v 51 feet; thence north 65°05' west 40 feet; thence northerly` .'Z along the westerly line of said lot 9 a distance of 59.6 feet to . Cr) ,) the point of beginning, except that portion thereof (�, condemned for State highway under King County Superior C Court Cause No. 757887. cz (74 AND WHEREAS, the lessee has applied for a building permit for the 0 construction of an office and storage building upon the premises and the CY) City of Renton is requiring that all future uses of the property be subject to a restrictive agreement. NOW, THEREFORE it is hereby agreed by the parties as follows: The owner and lessee of the above described property agrees that any future change in the use or occupancy of the premises or building built thereon will be subject to review by the utility engineering division of the City's Public Work's Department prior to any,change in such occupancy or use. DATED this 1-/ ' day of June, 1989. J,o• -W. Dobson Owner in His Separate Right ACCORD, INCORPORATED _ _ [[ —J- t`l/K�j• / -V 2.-.C. ' 4 4.�.._ .1_ t.. 1- a 03 Lessee t,,,t :,;a:Y::.r; . ,-r_, „LED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST 0 O'FFICE OF INE CITY CLERK RENTON MUNICIPAL BLDG. 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WA 98055 S STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss COUNTY OF KING• On this _ day of June, 1989, before me, the undersigned, a Notary ;� Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn r personally appeared John W. Dobson, to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he signed and sealed the same as his free and voluntary action and deed, for the uses and purposes therein n�ntioned. GIVEN under my hand an official seal this =2/y day of June, 1989. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State _ of Washington residing at 5& 1 S �3O(s� S� P u My commission expires ti ` 0 1.4 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) G )ss COUNTY OF KING ) On this >-I'`( day of June, 1989, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington duly commissioned and sworn personally appearedrro,rt T, to me known to be the yres,0-c..,-- _ of the corporation, that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said.corporation, for the use and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said. corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in this certificate above written. VA-L\Sir\. _CtAA)f NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington residing at 50(S "--3-\ My commission expires _1I- 5 3 T »Ct7 2E NT P NN G'4P.MYST ON > >> > E<I g .::.::..::.::.::..::..::.::.. :..::. :.:. . . Y DATE: OCTOBER 9, 1989 TO: MAXINE MOTOR, CITY CLERK FROM: JEANETTE SAMEK-MCKAGUE \/"" SUBJECT: TACO TIME COVENANTS, FILE SA-1257,&9" This memo is to transmit the attached set of covenants for the Taco Time Office Building (File SA-125-88) which were required as part of the approval of the project. The City Attorney has approved the covenants as to form and Design Engineering has approved the legal description. If you have any questions, please call me at 2550. ,... . • SPEED LETTER • . . : . , . TO: . /E-/ A/6.;7-7—g- PROJECT: 7 ) 7—/,14g SUBJECT: . . _.. r.-.(--7•,://Li . /.(-7.__).' .7--b, . • s • • • , . • , . , . • / ,4/e/v 4e--7-,4 / if.•-••_ ____.--,- (Signed) , - • • i':.•::'2:f*,!,..: ,:. :• ';', ' . '.-•*•, r.,-.; ,..'..'. •••:f..,":" .- * ••••••` *.•'''• ** • *• ••'• * •.:;; ...:.,•,*;/,,•••• • * ' 1',*2„ r,'•,.4. . * "''',?:.:7•i:: • . ,...,, . - • ...... i.,',:3•1 , : •. ,•,. • ,• ...„. 4. . • .•., . , •• • , . .•• •:....1%,,,i,, , •:., • ..• ., • : :•,...,. • .!*:.•.'• ',`,•'!:;,',)'• .• .. * ' : . :.•,., •.•••,•:'•!". .. •-2•.,,,',:-.!:.• : ...,:•-...•;‘,•g•• • ,....-...,..;.,.J..; - . ...... .-:::,.• •• •:. : -.,,... -'...;),,v., .• ,•••• •?, : .-. J.;.,.,, • ... ,...•lir, • . ••.-.• • .; ,• ,.. -,.., • • .• 4..,..,,,,.: .. . , .. • '.. ••••,;,..•,.?,'...4•..• . .,.. ._ . •. ,,........ „ : . . . .. . ,. .. . .• ?;..r.,', • . . • 6,4.....,..s .•:. • •' • ...• ,. • ...,... ,... ' . ,. .. . . , . :':/...:::-.:••••:.,::. :,.... , ..:.,..:.•:. .•'..• .: .•„ :- • .• ;•A ::c.,•• • . ••-,.':-.., '., • ••• : ' •••:. ••;•• •...:.•l:?::•....?...•• i: •::•.: ;:'...',..',... .•••.....-::. ... .•• . ,',Wi;:•.1:i;. •• .. ,..',...:':•,. .,:::: .'-.., ..• •.• . •• :".!:'•;,.':::P'•' . - •:;' .. s :•;:•:::.......-.:•••••••:::.1:::', • ..'1.•:•..f•e':',.::',' ... ,••E.!;.2:‘,•,-;•;..:••, .:...• :••••-•.:•. .•••••• •:•-•:. — -.lg.:IA.:. : ..f,.. . :. •:. ....••• ' .. :,,,•:,,.,-.6, •••• ..... .,' „:;'.. ... ..;;•,•,.• :,• ...,,,,,I.:,::',1•• • ' ., . -::•••,:,;•••-;::i:;.....-; .;:.'.• ::,......;:. • :.,.. t: -. ' r., -. .•; ?,:::it.,. :,. .-•.: ••••:. .• . ' ..,... .... •• ,.........,:f. • • ,. :. ,•:• •.....:.: •,......,..::::. ., „ •...,/..,;,,,,,:i? • . :',.;.?ik',.ii,"•-..-..•• ::,.::::-..„ ,........,..:•,., .•:.::::: . .:...,.., .• s., .•;,•:‘r:7' •• ,--!.. • -,.....•.::. • •.••••••• .• ,..,• :• r•-?;ii . • ••::::••• '• ,......?..• •••••':',.••.;,, - : :,•• .." .....4,:i......--:,•,. pc • : •. ,;5;:,...t.1:,--..•... ..,..:, .,•••,..,•,,.• ••• .: ." .••••• • A.,,,, h.. . ..•,,• . , •." . ... • • .. . . .. . •• • : ,..•-• ,4,.•:' . ' •',:;:\.•:.;i0.,:.' ...... • '.:•'••••••: •,.:' '.,:,• . •\ 1 ':e:4' '', ... :• •'•'.. • .•. .-!a'.q.;*;?•• . ' ; . .. .. .'.. ••• :;:';:!.. . •••' : • "•1;;'.':'''. .• • , • ,!:.:;',,;',.'::': .' .. '.. '',. :: ' : •• • ' • . ...ii ,W • ., .. y,•.; • . j...'..* •--,t•e.ii • , .• • .,,,, • • '• '1F'.-• ,•,',•. • •: • ' *•.:4,' •• . : i .. .' .:V••',,,'',. "... !'• .. :' , ,, , . . ... ',..,:'.'J'• •• • — •• •"....'• *•• .. ' .: "•1.';:,•,,I•NI;'. . •; •,•• •/: ...P• • :' .. . ....:.:..,q• • . .• ,. . ,., . , , • 4...,::',.i.; .•••-• •;.'.. ,•.'-g,. -. -.:,-.'...• :' .• • .•.: ;• • •::141..,;i:J. •.• ... .... .- .. .. .1. • ..'i:." ....• . . . ., ....... . „ „ . .• .. ,. ,•. ,...'....,-,',.,... .,.. . • . • •.- • . :il• -:.. ...• • • • • ''... .... .. ...,'fi'',.4. • ' • ... . - ,- •, . .'.. - . •t.ii;',.. ...:3I,,,l',. ". ..,,'f. ..; .''. ... '........ • .• ‘'...;.:.•:);*.i.:' • .,. ... ''••. '.. .,..1 •,', ••. ' • ':6•,:,„';f,, .: ••••• ., : . ' •.', •,-•.e • :..•.,... . .... . . ,,•,,...;r - • • * : 1:',...:NI ' . .: 'ic,ti':1.'••!: • • • -:*:•.r:.•''* :,:*••• •*..:-.. . , . ••: ''...3!;;;,....;'!:,f1; ',... ,. .••1.•, i:,‘'."l', .. •••• •''• * ! firc:4 • • ,:',•::,•.• .. i ,:•••.. •• • .* :-'4•.••;),:•,,, . 't,)-:'7.1• . • . ...ilk,*:;4•••• *," .* •• 1 . ::: .•.. .1 • „ .. ..... '.•• ••.-• •• , • '',1,,..••/•4 • i .:ii,',T,•• . .. ,•,,,•,!,,:.. :..,• ...,,,•••,;, , • •• .;':'..:'•• • •••• '' •':-' ' • !,.4':'•,7;.•*' * • . ••••••:,` :, • ,...—. •-::.:•-•..•-* . • 1-','...3.0..*: .-•.::•.' ....•••••:,.' ..i.' '*•*;*,•••:•,'• :* *. . — • ..:*•,,1*••,1:,-1.'•: .:!:;•:,f,,j'1:-':::•.;...' ' .:.'•,, .......,......',... .....::..'.. . -, .:*. .. lk,;•(}!;;;;;`,........ . ':. ••:; 1:*,''' .'' -7''':. :'i .•-. :;1,;6,:'!•:•':' •.: '• — ....:' '..•r .. , . . .,.. .. • '.•‘.i.:.. • . „.. - .... ) 1 , A / ,''. 1-7- 7,— . • ; . I, ,,„;„_. ,- . • , , •-. 1,., SEP 20 '89 14:45 WARREN & KELLOGG PS P. 1/2 I Aminiiiewinionsmies..4=4. % WARREN KELLOGG, BAII, :ER ) , DEAN el FONTES, P.S. • mom. .4,,,wimm ATTORNEYS AT LAW (200 255-8678 PLANN Method of Delivery DIVISION POST OFFICE BQX 664 IGO SOUTH SECOND STREET CITY OF RENTON RENTON,WASHINGTON 98037 Hand Delivered TO) SEP 2 0 1989 rif (( ) Other ,, • irN FAX iv tti.c.amr.z, IL . 266-n5-Oral/. il ° ,,,.... ...„ /...I '01 •--. ,- .4 _ . -._, ., ( i E.IC.:.r'.',;.; -./ ' • f. : - . • , • - .. We h;; ..e t.,::,:._••: •' •s ••.!!•:P.,•. •; ..:.- -••:.:-,•-,::._:-.). . . . _... . — • • ' • - - ---- - --- --- - ) ... 7.' '..-,„,L':•. •:'::7.:,:-.: .',:l• .-,..;: : : -1=fi :, ,1.. 1L)::I ,-:'..,'T102,1 ( .% , .,, ( -\'.&':1=1,._•,!::.‘JI/ Ae_:I L'...,' ' ' :., ' f T:-.%;,,,.P.:;;; lirj:..7)VI „ .... - -- ---- - -- - -''-•"" . PoP. 2.^:•-:. 7.-"::__;'.1r4 ;1411' !.: ThiS ti'arlf;TiliSSi011 COD SiStS 3f. ___^.::- .1..,, , -._,..ET,C , in cd.udirq„,[ T.1-2.i, co'.•••:-,: p7.ge. it for you (.'10 n01: yeceive all of th.c; 1-.3,•:tas, or i. i::., uot, i,.. ,i.t.-11,-:]; plc:a$'c contact. our of ficc inmediately. ------------- — _ —__---____ ____ —----- . ., :Rol-nal-1$; -•4 ... , . . , . . •, . . ..... -.?1, l 1.,41-IMMII 1..C_LLU,:.0. CITY OF RENTON Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Daniel Kellogg -Mark E. Barber - David M. Dean - Zanetta L. Fontes - ctob3rt 1.. Sewcll , Assistant. City Attorneys DRTOON COY OF FIEN ION SEP 2 0 1989 - • - „. t L.= L. • ,--- • • • • • t of the rictive • • , unt be . • . by the ' fl - artment . . ....ovenant use or the been • - require •. a se If been • language use or Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street - Renton, Wathington 98057 - (206) 255-8678 �i CITY OF RENTON ..LL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION January 26, 1990 Mr. Jack Love Taco Time Corporation 1911 Maple Valley Highway Renton, Washington 98055 Subject: Taco Time Office Building-Large Maple Tree 3300 Maple Valley Highway Building Permit No. B-15199 Site Plan Approval: SA-125-88 Dear Mr. Love: This letter is written as a follow up to our meeting on January 25, 1990 regarding a large old Oregon Maple tree that is located between your new office building--now under construction--and Maple Valley Highway. The tree, as I understand, is very old and in a state of decline. I am also in receipt of the letter from your landscape architect, Lynn William Horn, who has inspected the subject tree and has recommended that the tree, including its stump and roots, be removed because of its potential harm to parked vehicles and pedestrians below. I have also visited the site and inspected the tree and concur with Lynn William Horn. The tree should be removed, as it is in a state of decline and is a detriment to public safety. Saving this large maple tree through the site plan approval process created a large planting area in order to retain the tree. I would recommend that new landscaping be incorporated into this space once the maple is removed, using a Sweet Gum tree (Liquidambar styraciflua) and, perhaps, two Austrian Black Pines (Pinus nigra). These species of trees are currently proposed in the overall site development and, for consistency, would blend in well with the landscaping design. Thank you for bringing the matter of this unfavorable tree to our attention. Sincerely, QA-A-"--V• LA--, 4 ~� Jerry F. Lind Land Use Inspector/Landscape Planner JFL:love:dsk 10 cc: Lynn William Horn, ASLA Paul Casey, The Casey Group Architects R. Nelson, City of Renton D. Erickson, City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 f 0 CITY OF RENTON "LL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION MEMORANDUM DATE: October 20, 1989 TO : Maxine Motor, City Clerk FROM: Sandra, 'eeger RE : Accord, Inc. SA-125-88 With this memo I am transmitting the above referenced file to your office. • CITY OF RENTON OCT, 201989 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 • .......... ....... ..... ::: CUR RENT.>:: PLAN • ME.. MORA DATE: OCTOBER 9, 1989 TO: MAXINE MOTOR, CITY CLERK FROM: JEANETTE SAMEK-MCKAGUE \)' Ll SUBJECT: TACO TIME COVENANTS, FILE SA-125-89 This memo is to transmit the attached set of covenants for the Taco Time Office Building (File SA-125-88) which were required as part of the approval of the project. The City Attorney has approved the covenants as to form and Design Engineering has approved the legal description. If you have any questions, please call me at 2550. • • • • • .. • SPEED LETTER . . : E • -., . .1 • TO: DATE• ?2 )/ /2 8 9 ._1 : A/ ------- 7-7-. . . PROJECT: 7-/ICr) _77,i4 SUBJECT: . • 7- _.r-'.,//6 • . , • • • • • • • , . • • 4RAA7-74 / ,-..- _••••••,• (Signed) •, . . . . . ,•..:, ...- - " ';-.. • .7':::'...'t.....4.:' ' ... ''''.-'''''•'.:i;....":•1 ' • • . . '.1i':.:.`:'..'• .. : ' ' .I'S‘. ..,.‘ . .r .•:•i." I ;•',...:.i.. ... ' ...' ' ''..''': ' .' :: ...:;%1•••! .. .. .• . ' ,• q. .:,‘ , l'.4:,*• .."..' .:•• . '?. •.' . .. ' . '.. . • • . •••••...a. , . ...,. , . , , ,,,.. , .• . . . ..'Z,.',..1..:•;:... ..... . . ., . , • • ' .• ' . ...:. ....''• :: .4f,I,-;:. .... ,!'..'.._ ..!'.., ,. ... .. . .t:.!iil • . . • .... .,. . . . . ., t ' " • . . ,• „ .•'. :::....,:1•• . • “•1 1 • ' ••• • . • •. • .....„'•- •• • :, . ; ..•;.:...... .'1:'''.: • . . '..' '11•1•••;Ni • 1 •;1',;:'•‘;''''':: . .;.•'''.. '..1.1.; ':'...' ''• • .' • : . . , • ' .1,•A•••,,. e.....,..., • .••.'.. •••••:':. . • • • • ; ;');•14; • . • ' ., • • . .,i.,,,-,, • . ..•• .. • .• . . • ... -.. ' *: ....'7..'. ' • . • 'i..\.'•,:.,..A. • • • . 1 :(1:;;;.?..:,'4:.•:,.,• • •••••,.... •'...i....'...... ....'.... • :.`-': • .• .:?!:•.i • • .' ::. • • • ti', 1,1•;::.• .......,:••-•.•••11.1-..-i•,, •.',';'•'•:, •., -• - 3.), c ,.. •.: .1;,.e.'4•4•0:e.;:' - .. . •:..'. '. •.•'.• :• '•:• ••t;k".,,T' ••• • t..:'•••:...... . -: :. "'.0,,tt:'... ..:: . • ..';••..... . :„ . .. • 111:,. .. • ' • : • .: • ' ',...4: . , • ••• ' ...• • ••'.:•.f. ..... ,.. .,• :::11.-:•:,;ii.: ' .• , •'..i'.....',I!'j••• .....•. •••••• •• ,;. • ..,• •-. "-i:•:.•14 •. • ''. • ...,2 . : 41 ,./•..,...,,k, ,•''..1!:,'i-*•;L''. .., , . ••''• 1.:•••:1•,kil:::" \i • ••. • . . ,. . ,, . 0••••••••ti • - - , .. .. • . :,........iV , . . .• • , , . ..•,•,t,?.' ik.; - : ::1•;;•.1!.•;. . . • . .. ,•• I ....-..Y .:•‘,,,,.,:• ' , • ,,,!, y. . •1 • • '.., :3 •• ' ,. •••••,••••• , ::,,„:„.. • •••;,.......•::'•••:: .•• • •• • • . . . . • • • ..0..-.., r. .%,.• . • ••'• •)i.!....,:d.'.. , , ,. • . ...I .. • ' . . . .'.... •A.' 4 . - ,. •1.!...,4. •‘:. ...'......'',.....4.;:',41:".•':...'.. ....•.r. '.•.;...',;: : .1 ! ..:.. ' . • ••••%;•,'.,:f1 ... , ,.: •.;. . :',...'31!.. . . ...1' •iii..4', •••• ... .• <:::2; • ...,....:. ... .-; . •••,,,t,..,1•4,. . . .. .:.. , .. . •• C...47. • . .. ...,,., . . •i• •,, . . • •.,•,-,• • . •:i.,•,•. ••.,„ . .• :: ..•••. .:: :. • " ,,, • l'•• ' '•'.•/'•.:..* • . • :''.;'• • - - • . , • .,::44`.. • ....•; . '?' ..- • :' ' . • 1 .• . ••': .1 :;:::•.•:• . , . '', .',''.•. .. .-..,....4•-:.: : , .• '.."! .. -. , ,,)•:.%%* •. , .- •7.-4'.'. '. • .. .... . . . . .. . •4,i...:', •. .• •,..: '.. . ,N..,Ift • • ....,..- . , . • 'WARREN, KELLLOGG, \RBER, DEAN &FONTE;. S. • ATTORNEYS AT LAW (206)255-8678 !. , DIVIS. Method of Delivery Mail POST OFFICE BOX 6264 100 SOUTH SECOND STREET %I PI OF I It:PJ i lj��� ( ) Hand Delivered RENTON,WASHINUTON 98057 SEP 2 0 1989 ( ) other FAX NUMBER: I I; i,f`, I ' IIr 7 I.1 I 206-255-5474 . . TRANSMITTAL MEMO DATE: /V/ o2) /0 RE: J FROM: A-N/U cZ9, lreg.. We have enclosed the following doctlment(s): DATE DESCRIPTION I • i ( ) FOR YOUR INFORMATION �F k' ER YOUR REQUEST ( ) FOR SIGNATURE AND RETURN ( ) PER OUR CONVERSATION ( ) FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ( ) PER OUR AGREEMENT ( ) FOR NECESSARY ACTION ( ) SEE REMARKS BELOW ( ) FOR YOUR FILES . ( ) ( ) FOR YOU APPROVAL ( ) APPROVED AS NOTED -" FOR FAX TR.ANSMrrrAL: This transmission consists of c. , pages, including this cover page. .if for some reason you do not receive all of the pages, or it is not legible, please contact our office immediately; Remarks; I ' ,I a • s " : CITY OF RENTON Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney N' Daniel Kellogg -Mark E. Barber - David M. Dean -.Zanetta L. Fontes - Robert L. Sewell, Assistant City Attorneys r tr {[ 6 N July 28, 1989 • GM'OF rii:N TON S E P 20 1989 TO: Jeanette Samek-McKague, senior Planner ni FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney 1 RE: • . Restrictive Covenants - ,:Taco Time Office Building Dear Jeanette: . 1 I have reviewed the mitigation measure required as part of the 1 determination of non-significance and the proposed restrictive covenant. . • 1 The condition of the DNS was that a restrictive covenant be imposed ' requiring a review of all uses of the property by the Utility Engineering Division of the city's Public Works Department prior to occupying the building. The restrictive covenant supplied to the city references any future change in the use or occupancy of the premises or building. It appears to me that the restrictive covenant presumes that the proposed use has been approved, while the language of the condition seems to require �, .review of all uses of the property including the present use. If the present use or presently proposed use has already been approved by the Utility Engineering Department, then the language of the covenant is acceptable. If not, then the present use or presently proposed use must also be approved and the restrictive covenant must. be modified to reflect that fact. Lawrence . Warren LJW:as . cc: Mayor A8. 45 : 63. 1 • j j • 'Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (206) 255-8678 RESTRICTIVE COVENANT WHEREAS, John W. Dobson, as owner in his separate right and Accord, Incorporated as lessee under lease agreement dated October 4, 1988, covering the following described property to wit: Lot 9, Block 6, Maplewood Division no. 2, according to the plat recorded in Volume 39 of plats, page 39, in King County, Washington, except that portion described as follows: Beginning at the most westerly corner of Lot 1, Block 6; then south 61°09'15" east 50 feet; thence south 9°55' west 51 feet; thence north 65°05' west 40 feet; thence northerly along the westerly line of said lot 9 a distance of 59.6 feet to the point of beginning, except that portion thereof condemned for State highway under King County Superior Court Cause No. 757887. AND WHEREAS, the lessee has applied for a building permit for the construction of an office and storage building upon the premises and the City of Renton is requiring that all future uses of the property be subject to a restrictive agreement. NOW, THEREFORE it is hereby agreed by the parties as follows: The owner and lessee of the above described property agrees that any future change in the use or occupancy of the premises or building built thereon will be subject to review by the utility engineering division of the City's Public Work's Department prior to any change in such occupancy or use. DATED this --/ ' day of June, 1989. W. Dobson wner in His Separate Right ACCORD, INCORPORATED By: � �z,�.'Lessee "Led- , , i STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss COUNTY OF KING On this 2-l- day of June, 1989, before ine, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared John W. Dobson, to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he signed and sealed the same as his free and voluntary action and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand an official seal this .2f'-`day of June, 1989. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State - of Washington residing at 56,11. s 3044, zl- My commission expires y =$ - 93 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss COUNTY OF KING - ) ��/ On this �/4� day of June, 1989, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington duly commissioned and sworn personally appearedV-ro.,,i i-c-m-nk:cs,, 37, to me known to be the Ares of the corporation, that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the use and purposes therein mentioned, and' on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in this certificate above written.• - __?jkLtf\,M_ -��; NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington residing at storr_s 361.9i '\-►-- My commission expires *C3 SITE PLAN REVIEW REPORT CITY OF RENTON SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT June 13 , 1989 APPLICATION NO. : SA-125-88 .APPLICANT: Accord, Inc. LOCATION: Northeast corner of the intersection of the Maple Valley Highway and Monroe Avenue SW. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Supplemental review of sign elevation proposed for approved office building project. FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Accord Inc. , received site plan approval for the construction of an office and a storage building on the site in April of 1989 . One of the conditions of the approval of the submitted site plan was the submittal of signage plans for the development. The subject submittal has been made in compliance with this condition. 2 . The sign is located in the southwest corner of the site near the intersection of Monroe Avenue S.W. and the Maple Valley Highway. It is located approximately fifteen (15) feet from the property line. 3 . The subject site is zoned B-1, Business Use, which allows a variety of commercial, office, and retail uses. Section 4-1918 (C) (2) allows ground signs, provided the sign does not exceed 1 1/2 square feet for each lineal foot of frontage. The applicant has 394 feet of street frontage. Under the regulations, the applicant could have a sign with a maximum footage of 300 square feet for the face of the sign. The proposed sign is approximately 46 square feet in size. Thus, the sign meets the requirements of this section with respect to the size of the face of sign. 4 . The sign code, under Section 4-1902 (G) and Section 4- 1918, ground signs are allowed in the commercial use provided the signs do not exceed six (6) feet in height and are not located within twenty, (20) feet of the intersection. The proposed sign is four feet six inches (4'6") at the highest point and is within twenty-two (22) feet of the intersection. 5. The proposed sign compliments the facade materials used for the building which are brick and wood siding. 6. The applicant proposes placing two (2) ground mounted lights, which are shielded, to illuminate the front of the sign. Site Plan Revi Report Supplemental R:..,;:irt Accord, Inc. June 13, 1989 Page 2 I ` CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proposed sign is allowed in a B-1, Business Use Zone, the current zoning on the property. 2 . The proposed identification sign is in compliance with the requirements for ground signs as stipulated in the Sign Ordinance. 3 . The design and location of the proposed sign complements the visual character of the surrounding area and is in proportion to the building and site. 4 . The proposed lighting for the sign will not result in light and glare which could affect traffic traveling along the Maple Valley Highway or affect adjacent properties. 5. The proposed sign satisfies the criteria for the evaluation of signs stipulated in Section 4-738 D (5) . DECISION: Based upon the above analysis, the proposed ground sign for Accord Inc. , is approved. I •• 41 CITY OF RENTON ® Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney eel Daniel Kellogg -Mark E. Barber - David M. Dean.-Zanetta L. Fontes - Robert L. Sewell, &stant;City Attorneys jut 4 T �989 July 28, 1989 ' E ETO: Jeanette Samek-McKague, Senior Planner FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney . RE: Restrictive Covenants —Taco Time Office Building Dear Jeanette: I have reviewed the mitigation measure required as part of the determination of non-significance and the proposed restrictive covenant. - The condition of the DNS was that a restrictive covenant be imposed requiring a review of all uses of the property by the Utility Engineering Division of the city' s Public Works Department prior to occupying the building. The restrictive covenant supplied to the city references any future change in the use, or occupancy of the premises or building. It appears to me that the restrictive covenant presumes that the proposed use has been approved, while the language of the condition seems to require review of all uses of the property including the present use. If the present use or presently proposed use has already been approved by the Utility Engineering Department, then the language of the covenant is acceptable. If not, then the present use or presently proposed use must also be approved and the restrictive covenant must be modified to reflect that fact. Lawrence F. Warren LJW:as . cc: Mayor A8 .45: 63 . Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (206) 255-8678 Iw �i a CITY OF RENTON � • WILL zr COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor June 5, 1989 Mr. Paul Casey 10116 36th Avenue Ct. S.W. , #203 Tacoma, Washington 98499 RE: Compliance with Environmental/Site Plan Conditions Taco Time Office Building Ref. File SA-125-89 I ' Dear Mr. Casey: As we discussed last week, the building permit application was submitted without the signage for the project being reviewed and approved by the Zoning Administrator. As you are aware one of the conditions of the site plan approval was as follows: "4 . That the applicant submit signage plans for approval by the Zoning Administrator showing the architectural integration of all wall mounted signs together with any free standing signage prior to the submittal of a building permit. The applicant's plans shall provide information on the size, location, materials, colors, and lighting of any proposed signs. " The building division has routed the office building plans for review. We will not stop this process yet but do urge you to comply with the condition as soon as possible to help prevent delays in the issuance of the building permit. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 I t . In addition, we would like to remind you that restrictive covenants were required to be submitted prior to the issuance of the building permit. The mitigation measure reads as follows: I � ' "2 . That the applicant and/or owner, in order to avoid the potential for future adverse impacts on the aquifer, shall provide the City with restrictive covenants requiring a review of all uses of the property be reviewed by the Utility Engineering Division of the City's Public Works Department prior to occupying the building. These covenants shall be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of a building permit. " Again, in order to avoid any unnecessary delays in the issuance of the building permit, please provide the covenant as soon as you can so that it may be submitted to the City Attorney for his review and approval prior to it's being filed with the County Assessor's Office. We will not recommend that the building permit be issued until we have approved the covenants. If you have any questions, you may reach me at 235-2550. Sincerely, -tom S 3C.' 1inc_tom Jeanette Samek-McKague Senior Planner cc: Accord Inc. 1911 Maple Valley Highway Renton, Washington 98055 i I �--i II The Casey Gil p L EVU Oo 7 TEQ ISICEMIL ERE Architects 10116 36th Ave. Ct. SW, Suite 203 Tacoma, WA 98499 DATE(O l / 7 JOB NQ.�� (206) 584-5207 ATT TION /�`/_�11•f�-�J TO �' �J lU F�J 1 �a�' " a-Lv-e — ( eFD cc • > WE ARE SENDING YOUttached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings y Prints ❑ Plans 0 Samples 0 Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION GUY OF RENTON ihi rJUN 5 1989 P:d1ECEOVE • • THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For approval 0 Approved as submitted 0 Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution > ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ O FOR BIDS DUE 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS © 1� 4 Le). t,J1 )P Co COPY TO 4_ L ow`e C SIGNED: PRODUCT 240-3 /n e J Inc,Ostn,Mass.01471 If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. y4OOo SAti)f,t3LA �rex, cicaKI I1iIE12T DI,I GONG►2ET$ ELOGK 5TI'Uc.TUI2E. IEWIGK TO MAT01-1 I3UILVIhIG 15t2IGK coOLI2IE12 GOU12E,E, co1J612ETE FOUNnATIOIJ 70 1 TACOP.. TIME = , .. _, (., 11 CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS — -Kr MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY . Ii - - a T i (V 1 P120VIOE (SDIIELVE.lo) 2 G12OUNO MOUNTED LIGHTS NiI FIeONT OF eIGN rJ- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - o L- - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - --J 121_011 . al' E. 51T'E FLAW Foie SIGN LcATION.I SIGN ELEVATION %2II= 11-011 I \ - IFLAWING DiViSiGivi CRY OF P7TON D. JUN . 5 1989 ii rrm The Casey Group U 1 11 9 I Syr Architects -2-89 10116 36th Ave. Ct. SW, Suite 203, Tacoma, WA 98499 • (206) 584-5207 TACO, TIME OFFICE. BUILDING • • RENTON, WA. FOR: ACCORD, INC. 1911 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY RENTON, WA. 98055 PHONE: (206) 226-6656 SPEED LETTER , TO: / DATE: / 7c3 9 PROJECT: SUBJECT: / (Signed) R`� 0 CITY OF RENTON is& DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION MEMORANDUM DATE: May 1, 1989 TO: Bob Bray Arnet/a Henninger FROM: Jeanette Samek-McKague' SUBJECT: Legal Description for Taco Time File SA-125-88 Located at the corner northeast corner of the intersection of Monroe Avenue S.E. and the Maple Valley Highway When we reviewed the site plan application for the above referenced project, we discovered that the Kroll Map and the Assessor's maps were showing that the subject property included the Renton Radiator shop. We did not have information to verify that the property had been segregated. We now have information from the property owner of the Taco Time site, Mr. John W. Dobson, which indicates that the property was segregated in 1946 from Lot 9, Block 6 of the Maplewood Division 2, the site of the Taco Time project. I have enclosed the new information from Mr. Dobson together with the legal description and map of the site in the attached green folder. Please review the legal and verify the fact that the radiator shop is the actual parcel segregated from Lot 9 as shown in the submitted legals. I would appreciate receiving your comments within the next two weeks if possible. Thank you for your assistance. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 0011 I14 I M AVt St - '" f r�' '� •�•�`�= ! ! • RENTON WA 980S6• 5125 12.76458 B91210C 890C HART L MAPLEWOOD DIV # 2 I c640C 57E23 57823 3232 6TH ST SE RENTON WA 98055 512690 0165-00 ` 5 12.76458 891210CL ( 1889900CC DOBSON JOFN w 771536 MAPLEWOOD DIV # 2 1 i 2210C 2�5 �52135 6611 114AH AVE SE llf th RENTON WA S1 ,U-017U-W 1 6 12.76458 8ST2T t. 1890C 3 512690-017b-08 PARCEL CONTINUED ON NEXT PA K SATE PARCEL NUMSER-NAME IL ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION lEw el RI LEw IONS RATE EX OO€.VALUAT-LAND I-MNPs GENT TAX SPEC.AS'MT TOTAL AMOUNT PAID Marti — DU ISLW JUf W ! (11)30 PIAPLtWWU DIV A C i lf•(U0 IDY40: i ! i)V48f i 6611 114TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98056 ' L I 512690-0175-08 2 6 12.76458 8972100LL 1 1890C 1 i53 E BRUNETTE VERNCN G^ C1174 MAPLEWOOD DIV N 2 ; 480C € 5342E 3301 SE 6TH ST ! ( RENTON WA 98055 1 42} 512690-0180•01 ' 3 6 9.35858P 8912100(1 I 19OC L ' LIND JACOB & ANGELINA C0379 MAPLEWOOD DIV N 2 I # 3090C 24145 # 24145 3309 SE 6TH ST RENTON WA 98055 512690-0185-06 4 6 12.76458 8 210CL '9 1:•. ! HUDSCN ALICE P 1140982 MAPLEWOOD DIV N 2 I 24.te p6419 j p64,193 R317 ENTCN WAS ST 98055 "^ I 512690-0190-09 5 6 12.76458 891210C1. 18900 DCBSCN JOHN W 771536 MAPLEWOOD DIV N 2 230OC 6611 114TH AVE SE I 3 l3483 RENTON WA 98056 I 512690-0195-04 6 12.76458 691210U. 18900 i ! DOBSCN JOHN W 771536 MAPLEWOOD DIV N 2 ' I 6611 114TH AVE SE I 31i130C �47�16 t547'1E RENTON WA 98056 I ; I f i 512690-0200-07 7 6 12.76458 89121001. 1890C 1 DOBSON JOHN w 771536 MAPLEWOOD DIV N 2 I 131360C i64461 64461 6611 114TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98056 i ; 512690-0205-02 8 6 12.76458 8912100L 1890C 1 I } # DOBSON JOHN w 771536 MAPLEWOOD DIV N 2 I 2480C : p57;81 55781 6611 114TH AVE SE LESS ST HWY RENTON WA ;1451 I ;! ff512690-0210-059 6 12.76458 69 210C1 880C `BBPO EECBXOXJD J� C 780 MAPLEWOOD DIV A 2 I 1820C 34444 34444 POR BEG AT MOST WLY COR LOT 1 SD MAPLE VALLEY WA k., 98038 ADD TH S 61 DEG 09 MIN 15 SEC E # ! ! 50 FT TH S 09 DEG 55 MIN 00 SEC h 51 FT TH N 65 DEG 05 MIN 00 SEC G ! # 40 FT TH NLY 59.6 FT TO BEG 5116� -04 6 12.76458 89T2100L 3610C ( 4608C 771536 MAPLEWOOD DIV A 2 } 6611 114TH AVE SE LESS BEG AT MOST WLY COR OF LOT 1 1 I { j I ( jRENTON WA 98056 SD ADD TH S 61 DEG 09 MIN 15 SEC # I I i E 50 FT TH S 09 DEG 55 MIN 00 SEC W 51 FT TH N 65 DEG 05 MIN 00 SEC W 40 FT TH NLY 59.6 FT TO PT OF 1 ! ! BEG LESS ST HWY 512690-0215-00 DOBSON JOHN W 771536 MAPLEWOOD DIV N 6 12.76458 69T210CL 2 6611 114TH AVE SE LESS ST HWY RENTCN WA 98056 512690-0220-03 1 7 12.76458 85T210CL 1:•.•DOBSON JOHN W 77153E MAPlW00D DIV # 2 633�yF 3AR � L 'J CO TINUE6 WipIPAY PAG 3 512690-0225-08 L 1 PARCEL NUMSER-NAME a ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION LEVY SR EVY VALUATIONS 001 I 1 141H AVt St RATE EX OOE1L LAMP I rrs GEM L TAX OPEC.Al la TOTAL AMOUNT Pm:.NEC�•_oA RENTON WA 98055 I j 512690-0225-08 2 7 i I 3 HUSCM VIRGINIA 8N1675 MAPLEWOOD DIV N 2 9.35858P 897210CL ` 050C 532 NEWPORT AVE SE I 050C 2371 2371 RENTON WA 98058 512690-0230-01 3 7 12.76458 89 210CL 1890C CINQUE 100 N 32NDESTE E 240182 MAPLEWOOD DIV # 2 I 2670( 582306 58 406 RENTaI WA 98056 512690-0235-06 4 7 12.76458 891210EL 1890C BAILEY T R 601276 MAPLEWOOD DIV N 2 I I !NM 6344C 6344C 524 NEWPORT AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 512690-0240-09 5 7 12.76458 B9r'100L ! 1890C PETTY R J 701276 MAPLEWOOD DIV N 2 I I 13140C, 1642106 64215i 3425 SE 5TH ST As. 4 f11. • 4-0 //'Q` 0 o W < , ' "4,4 t,'11-C) • 1 60 6//7 v 42�$ 6G.90 . 14 • b Pk', <� k 0065 °0�0 oohs ooao '' , 0085 Oo90 "] \ 0095 \ N N l t f FF /3 /-� /S /6 /7 /B /9 2 * ^ ..a itL _ s t,tA S T. — _ i �J I "' v a. 5I2640 0\--- 0 I R '' :,. f '4 : a 9.5" `70 6o „ 3 60 60.9b 58•G9,N 6$ i t �O. 4 S G 7 6, 9 / \' 2 b CI►3' , y • ` • n N O 0) r , on o��S p,2 r. to h N 3 s> \ 0 `�'' Ste.os !( i40 *wM 4 N o- •...• 0 0140 � �E 59. / a 4:". ?Zs- OIS° 41^ �� �, 0135 ke# — t' O k . /it t".i f o �. e , - , �r�' is p ti r \ .e. !'`�, 6) , ��Y 0 4 tl t ore 1� �` 9 i. ", li _ 0 i w M oS 02�0 R 0 \ �" \ 4 •f fir'r ,. r C'j4 _ Q M ,o c S�'q v h0 �V^^ .N•' ? 'PI %'' 's- as-.s/ ?O' 4o `l .- .4 (H R • \ 70 , /, '6g R0,9 oi-65 e o & ......,,.......sr N ,,, ,,i.7.09 �N. .M �� \� �6 tC i0A 'k 0 2�,0 V ‘ o , M , -a . 47. s Q Tip �-1. 1 o I '� •' ' q 0is �s ,i,4, 3 cT�1 O R> n' 0. 4 /-'meµ `,. o -,..,„,• 0 'P..�2 4. 507.4/' 9. ,- r.1. '-ram. 7.2? • { • • :,.(i i I• , 411b 229 WILLIAMS AVE., SO. - P. O. BOX 59 • 1 \\Ri IstPg 2 7 1989p RENTON,WA. 98057 TELEPHONE (206) 255-8641 •TO (..e .tie.444u4.-2)1(16roZ-- DATE 0 i2)iv, A-co • -- a4t-P-"(7. . SUBJECT: g' . ' r. (c ')'. a('d -. FOLD- - a' 1, .4 el A,L I.ty• 4..e.4__di.A.,...eZ.a(/) ZG-0.6.164, deet4tertA.e 14,10 It- 3(c /'Ft 6.30 dale/ atty..3/. i t) , i 91746 -60-/-ele-X ,e2...44/..eteA.Le,.. .. Le „-;i aA-,•., &&e_1_e.._cti z ap o _Q 7r t Ak /04../ 1./-tti..A., . ,.. . . . 11.0‘ek-44-7A • ___ 7A.,77.-7.70r0-4177 B 7 iLltei:414P.OV ., ......1. . 'a' .,..0. • 3614630 I - 5 r g L.;...itai;41,4fAttr.;a'04-01110,,,%yftg.73,„:ix a .$2.30 s t : e • ..,-...ot . . . '71k.-rirCeg. „,:'-'- .*•-:,k. ..,_sitgie•.man,, . . 1 . :>.'17 •- ...-'-.. z-ii;,....4,•%,..,.,-...g -.4:tviellas:',..z.eansr..:and Verna' Irene Hermit:, her ,...„,., ,t,-.1),;, ...A.4 .4- nlv" 's' - . - '' -•• ; . /A* ,;., ,--,;,11 • ekfge:S:...'614, 141407 tii:Yeil:Lthe...itolwg re ait,in ko va two I.J.ott, ' V?. V t fvf 0.• ,'"Ftlmtigi,),01(p ,;";.,-;',.:-,,.: c:,::-,:-..":.:.;,.•'....,i1.,,,,14:'‘' ,,.s, levigod-.Div i2.a00or4ing to plat .thof.re sf,;',,, p• ; I.4VA, 1, 1.'4 ' ..,',4fit..;:i0•,L,''•••"' . :. S:','W,till''''' ,....,39,4,,ieeda or sd aoi two the par prop4Ociatilk4 :'•;." 'y : ''• ;le%. •s''' .4-4r, . , v.., .. .... ,,..,._ ,,-,_..,,A.. . 4,,,i , . . , „ti, • 0,t,1,,,,..1., .. , . -. „ ,:tz. ,,.A. . cad,...: y :the gag held by the Equi talk!, 1.- l'FlivIT:' ,'',-'''`... , .•,.°M?-50111',-jkintiiiii:ii:.Scri otad peri prop being convoy!)4!iinrtnqthwi:....i.,s , iml,„f ,v,..,..:;,.,,,.. '-'..,,'• pr,7,.042i,.! g...,andY.:904..',ot::4P.4 i g blk.:6 Maaplie!0,941'!:•.Dpe;i,i'I'..'.4p ;,..;;,,;-. ,;,:: ;;i....4.... , • .' :;'-',,'.i;,.-.! - :, ;:;.;;::.4;;, .., .:,.y;:.',f,,,4,):;.:R.,,,,,, i tioboosoovvitsiotrvt., od,,lot. .1,..,, *:4511050; w5Vrti, tbanaii.N',,65.03.;;;W; 40_.„ 0 It;'''figiilo4V;.'fl:%_':',i:56:' • .:::';:t.i5.1 - -.- 'eliik' ' ;I:ligi ..114 401c-','.9 o',.,a 414...ano i cor. 59•6,Irk:4 '%blo let 12, c!POb;'''' ..sq'''',' f ....:.v1:1;. •f.t.y,;•,!:,,,',,',.1 .,!,...gi'''.i•••.k.i,,,,j;,;:ir,;1:•;':'''.1:.....; ' •••4 '""• ' ' . ' •''..i''''''.,'fi.:':.'''','...:* i.',: r''.I'•i.'`iii:';:;• ', -, bile 4,:,otillai310004:1",,W,.. r ot • ,.J'.,.1*;!' . . 7,4trul. ,JS 4 0•94.tt 1 talenOli '8 45.14,120, 11.„*., .?:.'', ,,4 - , ..ty ,,,,,,,,,.' ,arrA.as,A4i.r4bili f ,iptly in:of the the Defenal'f.101t0. 4411,0criatios-:;: t, ,,f,t,,Z, 0'.',,,,,Forlsk, Sr't7,1,' '". '•'"'i *•:tboadtr:3):'52.02!3011 W-170!ft more or•lck40-i the ea . jaiCeVi,!.';.. •ly •04.1.t.," •••-••• 'i f••' '. .-..k/-•, ••-•"-'s-•iii e 'e,,,u.,W-SOV;15,4...,bit 4-,o11:Sd Maplernood•Die #2::Minot );1113r?,'; `.-.„..,',..7- ,tor:440-.."-nu.:'t#1, ,NEly at rgin or iota 15, 14,....enk.1, ,._:end!':r.,Af _L' .efir ,t445p:ior.r.,,,, 1,.„.46,• ...4144,444);;;i40',..pob., and any ptd; updar which there-tgual',:.77.:7'•:.-:f4ii`",,.,.p, , . .., , _ ,..,..6., , ., ,,,,..1.- ,• t4, 1-14Witi:.2. -0;.'+'":':•;;52„:. .;-'4001f0e tit .-.L.' '''' , • .:: . L- 't ...-. H ',... i...;: :- fikt • -:;, !• /44`qZ4'71, ....A'!.-:''',H. nning ri: •,,, • „•,...-4.f loittiolAuttoxsokbt..4aok- Limning, a single man bf Harriet A. ,,,.,,,.„ ,, ,,. , ,:,,,. ,:. ,,:..• . : . ,,t.4„4-4,,,,,, , ttit4. eclHenton (na.May 13-30) La to Carl ii..liammiff , ; , ): ,- ', :t: • 4.';'4q;q:qi-,•... /.0,,A004itevAitoilia'4114 by SToo . .:T. ; ""4 .. ,.: ' r4-tit. ,;','A 1,.11.f,f4 P',.'iRgrhy?"7-41•,'1,Cttrit.,}1.17.•''' ., • 'S.4 '..,1 gil.,'E.,. ," • ' .. r,i'',1U.PYA:M•P;;Sf,;i:''.,.';';,it,,,',.-.',..-1„„Pirg}.1A's.';':.,,:i'';1,.'': ' . . ,, s•,•,•,,t1. :: i ,.•:•,,,,,„Ir v,...,,...„-,,,.;:i,;1 '....;.;:,,,,r.; .;.•,.; .„ , ,,..,:;:, , —.....osv,....1, o': • - - - - . _ • . . .• r :-. --- - ________ __ . ... ________ . _______ . . ... .. . . . _ _ ..v. PLEASE PRINT IN CHANG:E___OF I • . NOTICE: TAXPAYER OR ADDRESS BELOW. 1 9 6 7 MAKE REMITTANCE PAYABLE TO NAME n? > n. REAL ESTATE TAX. STATEMENT A. A. TREMPER c > • • : < : rz.4.• -ADDRESS . . n. • , I KING COUNTY-STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY TREASURER CITY STATE OF ALL STATE, COUNTY,MUNICIPAL SCHOOL AND ROAD TAXES COUNTY.CITY BUILDING, SEATTLE 4, WASH. gi' EXAMINE STATEMENT — PAYMENTS ON WRONG PROPERTY CANNOT BE REFUNDED Z a El,- • -..,-.., NAME AND ADDRESS DESCRIPTION CONTINUED yeAROELINOUENT TAXES AMOUNT ••••• -.— • :-A....... • F.• :. '. John W. Dobson " DELINQUENT 55 CC - P. O. BOX 59 . . REAL ESTATE 0 it-zr.l. 0211 TAXES DRAW 56 _____ Renton, Wash. . . INTEREST• 1 D2 I'Ll '17 ,•• ACCOUNT NUMBER AT THE RATE 57 . m = 2' '• . LOT I BLOCK I LEVY I CODE I SEC. 1 TWP.I RO I TAX !-OT ' OF EIGHT • PER CENT PER --, 9 6 0751 51269 0211 ANNUM 58 ..- vp c4 _.. - D • MAPLEWOOD DIV NO 2 Less beg at most F. ..••; - W1y cor of Lot 1 th S 61°09'15". E 50' ACT INTEREST !-•US Ili .... • FURNISHED 60 ,..-:> — . th S 9°55 W 51' th. 7.: 65°05' W 40' th • 0 L., : . Nlar 591he ta ri: of bes ON REQUEST PLUS INTEREST * -J pm FIRST HALF MUST BE PAID BY APRIL 30, OR ENTIRE TAX BECOMES DELINQUENT. 2ND HALF DELINQUENT AFTER OCT. 31. TAX UNDER $10.00 MUST BE PAID IN FULL a. :. RATE OF TRAY PAGE LAND BUILDINGS TOTAL GENERAL TAX SPECIAL TAX TOTAL TAX 2ND INSTALLMENT I 1ST INSTALLMENT F. /— .- LEVY DOLLARS ONLY DOLLARS ONLY DOLLARS ONLY DOLLARS a CENTS DOLLARS & CENTS DOLLARS& CENTS DOLLARS a CENTS DOLLARS A CENTS • • - 64 70 3638 06 19 20 21 50 4070 253 33 zazalapp. ,fI ... :i. iPt'•- it. ...;. r ,. 131 67 b., ,• l' LI o • .i.: ,,- „INT:t+. •- --,1 nw.v.m.47.1.-:,-:4"., . .. . . . - • .. . _ . • . _. ,. . . . . . .:_. . .. PLANNING DIVISION . 3A1303. fri CINOFRINTON . tL _ .... . _ : 'APR 111O9'89 ...IV0 . VNWOIN a.2l-.,1r.' •W Y ' . . . .. DIS 'niIA ..... . . ,:; emo rom • - ' pJ\ NiNG Uiki ;U 3 ram` DOBSON, HOUSER & DOBSON CIr(OF RENNTON } 229 WILLIAMS AVE., SO. ',.. . rE\ P. O. BOX 59 f.R pR 2 7 19�9 0 RENTON,WA. 98057 • TELEPHONE (206) 255-8641 A� -1� . , To ,4 ii-A e i(a- k.- ' DATE 4 C'o�-nt, , ati,kwaratt• �T7 f7 ...e-z vim- - . SUBJECT: % ' 8%lt /41�� .tveoz(OV fi ' / 1kor• FOLD- • 1 6574'6..."-e `..:(;1 cop-v-1 da_p_,,,te_a_ev..4....eLadas...„..1.,64., /Iced;,-- - , If- 3 C /`f 6 3,0 dad `fee .3/. /9`6 e,0- -e-G' i Ica c 9,1 We f y D 'O -M� 0 #2.75 1 *- 3�1463G,� dreg 2.50 st , is Limning, a si$g ALA xo 3 ' �►! lG. Sabniif and Verna Irene nnZiff., h'.f 1 . fp spa sod wars to ap the fo1wL re sit in etc .. /" ;' :x: j,ipt L. blk 6 Maplewood Div u 2 a000rair to ..is t ti:oi ::: - , - 39 of plats pd 39, reeds of :d co tfv: the =er prop located l., ` ehlel is eewersd by the .1.tc held by t..e ..,uitalbe •;av:;a-s Aeleeiation. 9d lot and par prop .rein conveyed sub to Lhe a ' a quit aatg and ptn of lot 9, b1k 6 Ycplev:ood aiv ,2 :,> ,:., 110 U taws: �..• • Dog at the soot lily corner of ad lot 1, thence $ 61.09J'15" , ; `�' ill ' tt Simms I 9•55' W 51 ft, th..noe N 65005' ''1 40 ft tL -uce - s' its Wks Wly la of ad lot 9, a distance of 59.6 ft to the tob .40,': . . a; the most LII.y earner of lot 12, olk 4 of Maplewood Div = 170036'07m li 180.94,ft, thence S 45•14'20" 13 ;,f SS Lass to tbs Way la of the .Defense :1aat Corporeticn . theme S 52'02'30* ''! 170'ft more or leas to the .::oat V. : of lot-15, lk-4�of:Sdr Maplewood pleaoO0.ptivl thence edN 3yand• ._ 1_f. 'e _ Mtn undo. uhioh there is an .ZO ft to the pob, and _�. ._ . _ iiiiiilmuaater__main. Jack .arming bee Aug 31-46 by Jack pinning, a single :::an bf :-z:rriet J'ae..er sp fer wa re. at Kenton (ns.liay 13-50) :.;l to Carl �. 'r�a.. drr Has 567 8eatoa, rid by :;Too l rut • --- - J PLACING MGM 1989 0 CFIY OF RENNTO1 ) APRU N • CEOVE ' ` PLEASE PRINT IN CHANG-E._OF 26 NOTICE: TAXPAYER OR ADDRESS BELOW. '� 9 6 MAKE REMITTANCE - a Iy. NAME PAYABLE TO > j A. • 4 - REAL ESTATE TAX STATEMENT A. A. TREMPER . > > 1.a { i ADDRESS KING COUNTY—STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY TREASURER 3. - 6, .a In CITY STATE OF ALL STATE, COUNTY,MUNICIPAL,SCHOOL AND ROAD TAXES COUNTY-CITY BUILDING, SEATTLE 4, WASH. F' Q :: EXAMINE STATEMENT — PAYMENTS ON WRONG PROPERTY CANNOT BE REFUNDED r-,, zENT TAX Cr NAME AND ADDRESS DES CRIPTION CONTINUED YEADR ELINO UAMOUNTES �- 1 John W. Dobson DELINQUENT 55 Cd P• O. BOX 5g REAL ESTATE r 0 0211 TAXES DRAW 56 • Renton Wash. I I 0 ar_< _ INTEREST 1 coLV --4.. !` LEVY ACCOUNT NUMBER AT THE RATE 57 I y LOT I BLOCK I I I I I OF EIGHT 1 CODE SEC. TWP. RG TAX _LOT PER CENT PER 58 9 6 0751 51269 0211 ANNUM `= D � MAPLEWOOD DIV NO 2 Less beg at 59= Li. _ most '— W1y COT' of Lot 1 th S 61°09' 151"- E 50' EXACT INTEREST - FURNISHED 60 "' th S 9°55' W 51' th 65°05' W 40' th ON REQUEST PLUS INTEREST O w ' NIar 99sbi t. pi-. of hei3 • J W X FIRST HALF MUST BE PAID BY APRIL 30, OR ENTIRE TAX BECOMES DELINQUENT. 2ND HALF DELINQUENT AFTER OCT. 31. TAX UNDER $10.00 MUST BE PAID IN FULL. Q RATE OF TRAY PAGE LAND BUILDINGS TOTAL GENERAL TAX SPECIAL TAX TOTAL TAX 2ND INSTALLMENT 1ST INSTALLMENT O I.... ` LEVY DOLLARS ONLY DOLLARS ONLY DOLLARS ONLY DOLLARS & CENTS DOLLARS & CENTS_ DOLLARS & CENTS DOLLARS & CENTS DOLLARS & CENTS 1� 1 33' 06t T` i. +'�'►® 6a i9 20 2.':. 5 O 4070 263 3� T>• `,r; t. 131 6 7 PLANNING DIVISION 21 A 0 21 9 3 P CITY OF RENT N 1APRf989 0 `. ECEOVC NO..4^ . WOISIA'r- . .. 4' CITY OF RENTON ..LL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION • April 19, 1988 Paul Casey 10116 36th Ave. Ct. S.W. #203 Tacoma, WA 98499 RE: Taco Time Office Building Maple Valley Highway and Monroe Ave. SE ECF; SA-125-88 Dear Mr. Casey: This letter is to inform you that the comment period has ended for the Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the above referenced project. No comments were received. The Committee's determination is final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 p.m. on May 8, 1989. Any appeal must state clearly why the determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non- refundable $75.00 filing fee. If you have questions or desire clarification of the above, please call Jeannette Samek- McKague of our office at 235-2550. • For the Environmental Review Committee, Inc Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:mjp cc: John Dobson 6611 114 Pl. S.E. Renton, WA 98056 I 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 _ I • N OT E ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF-125-88, SA-125-88 APPLICANT TACO TIME OFFICE BUILDING PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN OFFICE BUILDING FOR USE AS THE CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS OF THE TACO TIME RESTAURANT CHAIN. THE SITE WILL BE DEVELOPED WITH A 7,792 SQ.FT. OFFICE BUILDING TOGETHER WITH A GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS SMALL STORAGE BUILDING CONSISTING OF 1,920 Northeast corner of the intersection of SQ.FT. FOR STORAGE FOR Monroe Avenue SE and the Maple Valley SOME OF THE PRODUCTS Highway. NEEDED BY THE COMPANY'S RESTAURANTS. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES 5 DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL ><LWILL NOT . BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., MAY 8, 1989• FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. CERTIFICATION I , Mn_ry S(kV ,O,. HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 3 COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN • ?� CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON Apri1 �`�i ►��`t , ATTEST: Subscribed end sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington • residing inf/-� , on the SIGNED : 7Q,y,, , ifewe&_ dayof 9 N OT E ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF-125-88, SA-125-88 APPLICANT TACO TIME OFFICE BUILDING PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN OFFICE BUILDING FOR USE AS THE CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS OF THE TACO TIME RESTAURANT CHAIN. THE SITE WILL BE DEVELOPED WITH A 7, 792 SQ.FT. OFFICE BUILDING TOGETHER WITH A GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS SMALL STORAGE BUILDING CONSISTING OF 1, 920 Northeast corner of the intersection of SQ.FT. FOR STORAGE FOR Monroe Avenue SE and the Maple Valley SOME OF THE PRODUCTS Highway. t NEEDED BY THE COMPANY'S RESTAURANTS. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL I><WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., MAY 8, 1989 • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 2 3 5-2 5 5 0. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. 51067 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Public Notice NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION E l l e ne L a vi l le ,beingfirst dulysworn on oath states ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated for the following pro- jects under the authority the Renton VALLEY DAILY NEWS Municipal Code. Thee following Applicants • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition have CO completedIMEa OFFICE mitigation process:DING TACO TIME OFFICE BUILDING (ECF; Dailynewspapers six (6) times a week.That said newspapers AA-125-88) publishedApplication for site plan approval to allow are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six the construction of an office building for monthsprior to the date ofpublication referred to,printed andpublished use as Timethe restaucorporanatet headquarters Therters siteof thll Taco restaurant chain. will in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King be developed with a 7,792 square feet County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal office building together with a small storage building consisting of 1,920 square feet for newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for storage for some of the products needed King County. by the company's restaurant. The property is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Monroe Avenue S.E. and The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition the Maple Valley Highway. OLYMPIC DOOR & MILLWORK WARE- , Renton Edition XX , Auburn Edition , (and not in HOUSE/OFFICE FACILITY (ECF; SA-008- supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers 89) �th l i c Notice e below statedperiod.The annexed notice a 'Applicant seeks administrative site plan — during approval for the construction&operation of Public a warehouse/office facility (38,000 sq.ft./3,200 sq.ft.). Warehouse will be used was published on April 4 , 19$9 to store wood products (e.g. doors, trim. sash, etc.). The property is located in the southwest corner of the East Valley High- way and S.W. 27th Street(2700 block East The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the Valley Highway) BRAN DAL WOOD (ECF; R; PP-015-89) sum of $ 4 4 . 8 0 Applicant programmatic krezone of s to: 1)obtain 5.5 acrenon-project,sub-t ject property from G-1, General Use, to R-1, Single-Family Residential Use; and 2). create a 21 lot preliminary plat for future development with single-family residences. The property is located at 2113 Duvall Ave- nue N.E. Further information regarding this action Subscribed and sworn to before m is day of Ap r i 1 19 R is available in the Community Development; Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. This Determination is FINAL. There is a 14 day appeal period which will end at 5:00 PM on May 8, 1989. Any appeal of this decision may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington. An appeal must state clearly, Notary blic for the State of Washington, in writing,why the Determination should be residing at Federal Way, - revised and must be accompanied by a King County, Washington. non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. t. VDN#87 Rev,eed+i-ae Published April 24! 1989 Valley Daily News R5231 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Environmental Review Committee Renton, Washington The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following projects under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The following Applicants have completed a mitigation process: TACO TIME OFFICE BUILDING 4-ECF; SA-125-88 Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of an office building for use as the corporate headquarters of the Taco Time restaurant chain. The site will be developed with a 7,792 square feet office building together with a small storage building consisting of 1,920 square feet for storage for some of the products needed by the company's restaurant. The property is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Monroe Avenue S.E. and the Maple Valley Highway. OLYMPIC DOOR & MILLWORK WAREHOUSE/OFFICE FACILITY ECF; SA-008-89 Applicant seeks administrative site plan approval for the construction & operation of a warehouse/office facility (36, 000 sq. ft./3,200 sq. ft. ) . Warehouse will be used to store wood products (e.g. doors, trim, sash, etc. ) . The property is located in the southwest corner of the East Valley Highway and S.W. 27th Street (2700 block East Valley Highway) BRANDAL WOOD ECF; R; PP-015-89 Applicant seeks to: 1) obtain a non-project, programmatic rezone of the 5.5 acre subject property from G-1, General Use, to R-1, Single-Family Residential Use; and 2) create a 21 lot preliminary plat for future development with single- family residences. The property is located at 2113 Duvall Avenue N.E. Further information regarding this action is available' in the Community Development Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. This Determination is FINAL. There is a 14 day appeal period which will end at 5: 00 PM on May 8, 1989. Any appeal of this decision may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington. An appeal must state clearly, in writing, why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75. 00 filing fee. Published: April 24, 1989 LI SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICATION NO. : SA-125-88 APPLICANT: Accord, Inc. LOCATION: Northeast corner of the intersection of the Maple Valley Highway and Monroe Avenue SW. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a 7, 792 square feet office building together with a small storage building consisting of 1,920 square feet. The office building provides the new corporate headquarters of the Taco Time restaurant chain. The Committee review was conducted after receiving written comment from all divisions of the Public Works Department, all divisions of the Community Development Department, and the Fire, Police, and Parks Departments. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1 Yellow file containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2 Site plan (received December 29, 1988) . Exhibit No. 3 Landscape plan (received December 29, 1989) . Exhibit No. 4 Building elevation plans. Exhibit No. 5 Utilities Plan (received December 29, 1989) . Exhibit No. 6 Geotechnical Report dated January 13 , 1989. Exhibit No. 7 Soils Report dated February 1, 1989 . Exhibit No. 8. Supplemental Report to Geotechnical study dated February 21, 1989. Exhibit No. 9 Color Board. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND DECISION Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the Site Plan Review Committee now makes and enters the following: Findings: 1. The applicant, Accord Inc. , has requested site plan approval to allow the construction of an office building for use as the corporate headquarters of the Taco Time restaurant chain. Plans for development of the site include the construction of a small storage building. ''Site Plan Review Commi. e Report and Decision April 14 , 1989 Page 2 2. The office building, consisting of 7,792 square feet, will be for the corporate management and accountant offices for Taco Time. This building will have a maximum height of 28 feet 6 inches (28'6") . The exterior of the building will wood siding in a light beige color. A portion of the west elevation (the front of the building) will have a light beige brick wall adjacent to the front entrance. The wall is approximately 18 1/2 feet high by 18' 1/2 feet wide. Finally, the applicant proposes a blue mansard style metal roof which will also screen the mechanical equipment on top of the building from views of the adjacent single family residences. 3 . In addition to the office building, a 1, 920 square foot storage building will be built to store some of the products (cheese and paper) required in the retail sales of the restaurants. The storage building will be 15 feet 6 inches (15'6".) in height and will have a similar exterior treatment as the office building, i.e. , light beige wood siding and a blue mansard style metal roof. The roof, as designed will screen this mechanical equipment from the adjacent resident's view. Finally, two (2) roll-up doors are proposed for the building - one located at the southwest corner of the building's west elevation and the other at the southeast corner of the building's south elevation. 4 . The Zoning Administrator determined that the storage building was an acceptable use in the B-1, Business Use zone. This is further explained below under Finding 10.b. 5. The subject site was annexed into the City in 1947 by the Adoption of Ordinance No. 1293 . 6. The site is surrounded on three sides by single family residential uses (west, north and east. At the northwest corner of the project site, is a small commercial business, a radiator shop, which has been located in the neighborhood since the early 1960's. South of the site is the Maple Valley Highway and vacant and a City park. 7 . The applicant's file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. 8. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43 .21C, 1971 as amended) , a Determination of Non- Significance -Mitigated was issued for the subject proposal on April 3 , 1989, with the following conditions: a. That the applicant incorporate oil/water separators into the design of the storm water drainage system proposed for the site; b. That the applicant and/or owner, in order to avoid the potential for future adverse impacts on the aquifer, shall provide the City with restrictive covenants requiring a review of all uses of the property by the Utility Engineering Division of the City's Public Works Department prior to occupying the building. These covenants shall be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of a building permit; ' Site• Plan Review Commi e Report and Decision April 14, 1989 Page 4 On March 16, 1989, one of the engineers visited the site and based upon the visit, revised the Division's comments. The applicant shall not be required to prepare a traffic study. Instead the applicant will be required to provide channelization at the intersection of Monroe Avenue S.E. and the Maple Valley Highway by stripping the roadway. Further, that the applicant provide a street plan meeting City standards; that the applicant contribute a trip mitigation fee (voluntary condition of environmental determination issued for project) ; and that the applicant provide street widening on Monroe Avenue S.E. if determined necessary to accommodate the channelization lanes at the street's intersection with the Maple Valley Highway. Design Engineering Staff The design engineering staff did not approve the project due to the lack of final plans for the division's review of the off-site street and storm improvements as well as the sanitary sewer connections. In a separate review of the geotechnical study provided by the applicant, the design engineering staff requested the following comments be transmitted to the applicant: o "Under the pavement design portion of the report the soils engineer refers to gravel base as needed pending their review. The City reserves the right to direct the contractor to place gravel base within the City right of way whether the soils engineer requires it. " and o "The soils engineers recommendation for pavement section within the roadway of 3" AC and 6" crushed rock is not within the City's minimum pavement section. Should be: 4" AC (2-2"lifts required) 6" crushed rock 12" gravel base (as determined by City) . Long Range Planning Division The Long Range Planning Division staff did not approve the project commenting that the land use was inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and that the land use was inconsistent with the single family area. The staff commented further that the location of the use was not consistent with the regional headquarters proposal. As a result of Planning Division meetings, staff determined that the applicant's project could be processed since the project complied with the City's current policies and regulations. Staff concluded that while this site might not be the best location for a regional headquarters, the City's Comprehensive Plan policies and zoning regulations did not preclude the review and approval of such a development at this location. 10. The applicant's site plan, as conditioned, will comply with the requirements of the site plan review ordinance as required for developments in the B-1, Business Use Zone. Section 4-738 (D, 1) lists ten criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider along with all other relevant information in making a decision on a Site Plan Approval application. These include the following: Site 'Plan Review Commi e Report and Decision April 14, 1989 Page 5 a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies; The office building proposal is not consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Element designation of Single Family for the site. The Comprehensive Plan is a guide and does not mandate that development occur as shown on the Land Use Map Element of the Plan without consideration being given to other policies of the Comprehensive Plan. In this case, the project was reviewed in light of the Commercial Use policies and found to be in general compliance with said policies. The general policies of the Comprehensive plan reviewed for the project included V.A.4. through V.A.r7, V.A. 10, and V.A. 13 . which state that commercial areas should be conveniently located; should minimize traffic congestion; should be compatible with adjacent land uses; and provide for adequate emergency and service access to the site. The project is further compatible with the goals and objectives regarding the actual design of the project and site development. Specific policies, V.B. 3 through V.B. 5. , address the need for commercial projects to be well-designed; buffered from other uses; and designed and maintained in a manner which avoids adverse impacts on adjacent properties. Further, in the Northeast Area Plan commercial policies state that commercial developments should minimize impacts to arterial streets which is achieved with the project design. Finally, policy no. 8 of the area plan states that "retail commercial uses along the Maple Valley Highway should be generally located east of the Cedar River Park and not extended in strip development easterly along the Highway" . The applicant's project is an office use only. There will not be any retail activity on the site. b. Conformance with existing land use regulations; The project generally meets all the development standards (including height, setbacks, and landscaped areas) required by the B-1, Business Use zone, the current zoning on the property. With one exception, the special landscaped setback along the east property line (discussed below) . The project also complies with the requirements of the Parking and Loading Ordinance. The B-1 zone requires a special setback for commercial uses which are adjacent to residential uses which are so designated on the City's Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Map. The property north and east of the site is zoned and designated single family residential on both maps. The applicant has provided a six foot (6' ) cedar fence and a five foot (5' ) landscaped strip along the property lines abutting the residential uses. In order to use this option, the landscaped strip must be sight obscuring which is not the case with the planting scheme shown on the landscaping plans. With respect to the storage building, the Zoning Administrator determined that the building met the definition of an accessory use. The decision was based on the fact that the use is incidental to the office building and will not exceed the maximum square footage of 33% of the office building as established by Code for accessory uses in the B-i zone. The square footage of the storage building is approximately 25% of the square footage of the office building. Site Plan Review Commi e Report and Decision April 14, 1989 Page 6 With respect to the parking and loading ordinance, the project meets the design standards, including the special landscaping requirements for parking areas which are adjacent to residential uses. A question was raised by one of the staff regarding the segregation of a small parcel of property from the existing site which is used as a cbmmercial use. Segregations occurring prior to 1971 are grandfathered. Any segregations occurring after that year require a property owner to submit an application for the division of any property prior to using the parcels for separate uses. The applicant will need to provide the City with information on when the segregation occurred prior to the issuance of a building permit. As noted above, verbal information has been provided indicating that the site may have been segregated prior to 1971. c. Mitigation of impact to surrounding properties- and uses; The applicant's proposal is designed with measures to minimize the impacts on the adjacent single family uses. These measures include: preserving several of the larger trees on the site; providing a six-foot (6' ) high cedar fence, with the top quarter of the fence in lattice work, along the north and east property lines abutting the single family uses and the commercial uses; and use of wood siding. One aspect of the site plan which warrants improvement, is the amount of landscaping on the east side of the building. The east side of the building is actually the rear of the building which abuts the rear yards of the single family residences to the east. The applicant's landscaping plan shows a five foot (5' ) landscape strip and a six foot (6' ) cedar fence adjacent to these residences. The B-1, Business Use zone in Section 4-711(D) 6 (a) 2 , states that the landscaping strip needs to be sight obscuring. In the case of the applicant's plans, the plans partially comply with the code requirement but the landscaping provided does not meet the requirement of "sight obscuring" landscaping. To improve the proposal's compliance with this code requirement, it is recommended that the applicant work with the City's landscape planner. The use should include a combination of adding trees along the east property line (from that portion of the east property line adjacent to the dumpster area southward and along the north property line from the northwest corner to the beginning of the storage building) and shifting the office building to the west in order to gain an additional four feet (4' ) of landscaping between the building and the sidewalk located on the east side of the building. The landscaping in this area should include the addition of trees which will grow tall enough to soften the building from the adjacent single family properties. Another area needing review is the applicant's location of the storage building with one of the roll up doors located near the east property line. Due to the nearness of the activity around the roll up door to the single family residences, the applicant should look Site Plan Review Commi e Report and Decision April 14 , 1989 Page 7 into alternatives which include the shifting the storage building to the west or rearranging the organization of the interior of the building to allow only one roll up door on the west wall of the building as the only delivery access for the building. Such a review is necessary to reduce the intrusion of the activity into the everyday life of the neighborhood. The applicant also proposes using & blue metal mansard roof to top the structure and screen the mechanical equipment. If the structure were in a commercial neighborhood the roof would be appropriate. However, since the structure is being introduced next door to single family residences which are so designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Map and Zoning Map, the applicant should consider the use of materials such as cedar shakes, tile or materials that have a woodgrain texture. It is unlikely that the single family uses will change over the life of the project unless there is a revision to the City's Comprehensive Plan identifying other uses as being more appropriate in this neighborhood. d. Mitigation of the proposed site plan to the site; The applicant's site plan and proposed construction activity, together with some of the environmental mitigation measures addressing on-site construction activity, minimizes direct impacts to the site-. The buildings have been sited to minimize the removal of the large trees on the site. In addition, the applicant proposes working during the drier months of the year to minimize the need for adding fill to the site due to the nature of the soils which tend to hold water when wet. Construction during the wet season (October 1 to May 1) most likely would result in the applicant needing to remove the wet soil in the building and pavement areas, replacing the soil with imported material. e. Conservation of area-wide property values; The development is expected to have a positive impact on property values in the area due to: 1) the fact that the project is to develop a vacant parcel of ground; and 2) the fact that the project, as modified through the environmental and land use conditions, will be compatible with the residential neighborhood. f. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; The parking lot as designed will allow safe and efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation. Due to the size and shape of the lot, and need to reduce, to a degree, the intrusiveness of the building on the adjacent single family residences, the building has been placed near the center of the lot with parking and circulation aisles around the building. Thus, for these reasons, the applicant cannot completely separate the vehicle and pedestrian circulation patterns. Due to the nature of the use, staff do not anticipate any occurrence of major pedestrian/vehicular conflicts in the future for the project. Zit e 'Plan Review Commi :e Report and Decision April 14 , 1989 Page 8 The project site is located across the street from a City park, the Maplewood Roadside Park. Staff believe that the park will attract employees from the building as well as the Maplewood Golf Course. Both locations are accessible by foot. The applicant should therefore provide pedestrian walkways between the office building and the sidewalk along the Maple Valley Highway. The applicant should work with the City's landscape planner in extending both sidewalks located on the south side of the building southward to the sidewalk along the highway. Please note that the applicant should delineate a walkway through the circulation aisle to direct pedestrians to the respective connecting walkway. g. Provision of adequate light and air; The design of the project ensures that the project, as well as the adjacent uses, have adequate air and light. h. Mitigation of noise, odors, and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; 1. Noise: The construction phase of the project will result in a temporary increase in the amount of dust and noise in the area. Once construction activity is complete, the proposal is expected to contribute to an incremental increase in the overall noise level in the area. The majority of the noise will occur in the morning and the evening as the occupants of the building arrive at and leave work. once a day a delivery vehicle will arrive at the site to pick up and leave off goods stored in the storage building. As discussed above, the applicant will be required to use the roll-up door located on the west wall of the storage building to minimize the noise impacts of the delivery truck. In addition, the applicant originally proposed placing a condenser on top of the storage building for the cooler located in the building. Adjacent neighbors would be subjected to a continual level of noise more commonly found in a commercial area. In order to mitigate this noise, the applicant proposes to eliminate entirely, the condenser on top of the building and replace it with a water cooled condenser inside the building. 2 . Odors: . The proposal is not expected to generate any odors requiring special mitigation once the construction phase is completed. 3 . Other harmful or unhealthy conditions: The project is not anticipated to create harmful or unhealthy conditions. Some concern was raised by the Technical Advisory Committee regarding the impacts of paving over a majority of the site which does contain some residue from the Olympic Pipeline spill. Presently, a residual of fuel- related contamination is present in soils beneath • Site Plan Review Commi _ e Report and Decision April 14, 1989 Page 9 the site at a depth of about 18-20 feet, which is near or below the typical low ground water levels. Through chemical testing of the residual contamination, it has been determined that the more volatile hydrocarbons have been removed from the soil by active and passive means. The remaining residue is not expected to generate fuel-related subsurface vapors and is expected to continue degrading through natural processes. Thus, the geotechnical engineers do not believe the contamination will impact the proposed development of the property. The Utility Engineer sent the geotechnical engineer's report to CH2MHill, the City Consultants for our Aquifer Protection program. The consultants concurred with the applicant's geotechnical engineer's report that development of the site will not hinder the natural degradation of the toxic residual beneath the site and the residual will not impact the development. Another concern expressed by TAC members was the impact of the project on the City's Aquifer and quality of drinking water. The Utility Engineer has indicated that the site is located in Zone 2 of the Aquifer Protection Area. Development of the project will not require any special measures except oil/ water separators since the site is proposed only for office use and the storage of cheese and paper products. The applicant does not propose to store any hazardous materials on the site. While this proposal may not use hazardous materials, it is conceivable that during the life of the building that another use could be made of the site which might use hazardous materials. In order to avoid the potential for future adverse impacts on the aquifer, the Environmental Review Committee, as a condition of the environmental Determination issued for the project, required the owner of the property to provide the City with restrictive covenants requiring all uses of the property be reviewed by the Utility Engineering Division of the City's Public Works Department prior to occupying the building. These covenants are to be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of a building permit for the project. Finally, with respect to groundwater and storm water runoff, the impacts from the site will be from petroleum products incidental to vehicles in the parking lot. The applicant proposes a tightline storm system for capturing the storm water runoff and disposing of it in the City's existing storm sewer system. The applicant did not include oil/water separators in the design.. The applicant, as an environmental mitigation measure, is required to incorporate the oil/water separators into the stormwater system for the site. Thus, the project, as mitigated, will have minimal noise, and health impacts. •Site.'Plan Review Commi ,e Report and Decision April 14, 1989 Page 10 i. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; and Development of the project is not expected to create a burden on public services and facilities in the area. The site is adequately service by water and sewer services; fire and police service the site; and the existing roadways, with the modification required as a condition of the environmental Determination issued for the project, are sufficient to meet the traffic needs generated by the proposal. j . Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. This development is not expected to lead to the deterioration and blight of the neighborhood. The project as modified will minimize negative impacts to the adjacent single family area. Staff believes that the commercial development will be compatible throughout the life of the building with the surrounding neighborhood as the single family area redevelops. 11. One of the reviewers questioned whether the Accord site had ever been segregated from the parcel shown belonging to the radiator shop located adjacent to the northwest corner of the Accord site. The applicant's representative has received some information verbally which indicates the. property may have been segregated prior to 1971 when the City adopted its subdivision ordinance. While actual written documentation has not been presented to the City, the lack of this information will not affect this approval. Since both properties are zoned B-1, Business Use, the ordinance does not preclude two principal uses on a single parcel or a complex from being developed on the site. The applicant will be required to submit a short plat application should the documentation provided to the City indicates that the segregation occurred after 1971. Conclusions: 1. The subject proposal generally complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. 2 . Specific issues raised by various City departments focused on were: . a. Noise from condenser and roll-up door on south elevation with respect to the adjacent single family residences. b. Buffering of project from adjacent single family residential uses. • c. Whether the property was legally subdivided to allow the segregation of the radiator shop from the rest of the property. d. Compatibility of project design with the existing single family residential uses. e. Compatibility of the use with the City's Comprehensive Plan. f. Construction impacts: dust and tracking of mud and debris on streets. Site Plan Review Comm!. e Report and Decision . - April 14, 1989 Page 11 3 . The proposed use is not compatible with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Single-Family Residential. The proposal, however, as discussed under Finding No. 10.a. satisfies several of the City's policies for commercial uses and developments. 4 . The site is served by water and sewer facilities. The applicant needs to work with the Utility Engineering staff and Fire Prevention Bureau to ensure adequate fire flows to the site. 5. The site plan as presented, provides sufficient parking to comply with the Parking and Loading Ordinance of the City of Renton. 6. The site plan ordinance asks that projects be reviewed with respect to proposed impacts to a site; surrounding uses; to existing codes and public services and facilities. The development provides adequate vehicular and pedestrian circulation; will not create harmful public health problems or create unsafe conditions harmful to others; is not expected to adversely affect property values; provides adequate air and light both for the development and adjacent uses; and the proposal will not lead to neighborhood deterioration or blight. These specific criteria have been satisfied. 7 . The setbacks for the buildings meet the necessary setbacks established under the zoning code for commercial uses. The proposal, adjacent to Single-Family Residential uses designated as such on the Comprehensive Plan map and Zoning Map, meets minimum special setbacks specified by Code. 8. The development provides sufficient parking and adequate circulation for both vehicles and pedestrians. Recreational opportunities do exist in the area to the southwest and to the east. These facilities may draw some of the employees. The proposed sidewalks do not provide linkages with the sidewalk on the Maple Valley Highway for persons wishing to walk to these nearby facilities. Sidewalk linkages need to be provided from the south side of the building to the Maple Valley Highway sidewalk. 9 . The site design serves a majority of the large trees on the site and generally provides an adequate landscaping plan for the site. The applicant, however, needs to increase the landscaping along the north property line between the north east corner to a point even with the west elevation of the storage building and along the east property lines from a point even with the south elevation southward to the south property line. The applicant shall work with the City's landscape planner in revising the landscaping plan. 10. The application did not include a submittal of plans showing the signage proposed for the development. Signage is one element of a proposal that must be reviewed to ensure compatibility with the proposed structure and to ensure that the lighting and designs of a sign does not adversely impact adjacent uses. Plans for proposed signs shall be submitted to the Zoning Administrator prior to the submittal of a building permit. 11. Finally, the proposed office project with the accessory building appears to serve the public use and interest and will not be a burden on public services and facilities nor adversely impact the City's aquifer. Therefore the project is approved. • Site Plan Review Commi• e Report and Decision April 14, 1989 Page 12 Decision: The site plant for Accord, Inc. , file no. SA-125-88, is subject to the following conditions: • 1. That the applicant submit a short plat application to the City, if deemed necessary, due to the property being segregated after 1971, prior to the issuance of the building permit. 2 . That the applicant work with the City's landscape planner in revising the landscaping plan to ensure the landscaping strip along the east property line is site obscuring as required by City Code. This should include the addition of trees of sufficient caliper determined by the landscape planner necessary to ensure adequate screening from the adjacent residential uses and the width of the planting strip should be increase to six (6) feet. 3 . That the applicant revise the plans for the storage building to show one roll-up door located on the west elevation of the building. 4 . That the applicant submit signage plans for the approval by the Zoning Administrator showing the architectural integration of all wall mounted signs together with any free standing signage prior to the submittal of a building permit. The applicant's plans, shall provide information on the size, location, materials, colors, and lighting of any proposed signs. 5. That the applicant provide a revised roof material which is more in keeping with the surrounding Single-Family Residential neighborhood. 6. That the applicant provide a walkway linkage between the south corners of the building and the sidewalk along the Maple Valley Highway. Note: The applicant may be required to provide street widening, if determined necessary, to accommodate the channelization-lanes at the street's intersection with the Maple Valley Highway. For the purpose of these decisions, the term "should" and "shall" are to be considered mandatory and the term "may" is considered discretionary. Notes to Applicant: An applicant complying with these provisions and willing to hold the City harmless for any expense or damages incurred for work begun prior to the exhaustion of the 14-day appeal period and/or for work which may consequently be stopped by an appeal or work required to be altered or returned to its preconstruction state, may begin construction activities with the issuance of the proper permits. ORDERED this 14th day of April, 1989 on behalf of the Site Plan Review Committee. :1;;L'fj Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Site Plan Review Commie. e Report and Decision April 14, 1989 Page 13 TRANSMITTED this 14th day of April, 1989, to the parties of record: Accord, Inc. 1911 Maple Valley Hwy. Renton, WA 98055 Paul Casey 10116 36th Ave. Ct. S.W. #203 Tacoma, Washington 98499 John Dobson 6611 114th P1. S.E. Renton, WA 98056 TRANSMITTED this 14th day of April, 1989, to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer Lynn Guttmann, Public Works Director Ken Nyberg, Community Development Director Larry Springer, Planning Manager Ronald Nelson, Building Director Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Members, Renton Planning Commission Glen Gordon, Fire Marshall Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Valley Daily News REQUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATION must be filed in writing on or before April 28, 1989. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Site Plan Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior meeting, may make a written request to the Zoning Administrator for review by the Site Plan Committee within fourteen (14) days of the decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Committee may, after review of the record, take further action as it deems proper. If an appeal is made to the Hearing Examiner, requests for reconsideration will be forwarded to that office for consideration at the same time as the appeal. AN APPEAL TO THE HEARING EXAMINER is governed by Title IV, Section 3011(B) (1) , which requires that such appeals be filed directly with the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be made in writing before 5 p.m. on April 28, 1989, accompanied by a $75. 00 fee and other specific requirements. THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decision. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial committee decision, but to all Request for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the Hearing Examiner. All communications after the decision date must be made in writing through the Zoning Administrator. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine could result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. • -*METRO Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON April 7, 1989 APR i 0 1989 E C E Il U E Environmental Review Committee c/o Donald K. Erickson Zoning Administrator Planning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Determination of Non-Significance File No: ECF-125-88 Dear Environmental Review Committee: Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and anticipates no significant impacts to its wastewater facilities or public transportation services. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Sincerely, 4„,tie / Gregory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Planning Division GMB:wsg4584 t • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-125-88 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-125-88 PROPONENT: Accord, Inc. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of an office building for use as the corporate headquarters of the Taco Time restaurant chain. The site will be developed with a 7 , 792 square feet office building together with a small storage building consisting of 1, 920 square feet for storage for some of the products needed by the company's restaurant. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The property is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Monroe Avenue S.E. and the Maple Valley Highway. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Community Development Department Planning Division The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 . 21C. 030 (2) (c) . Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2) . Because mitigation measures have been imposed, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from April 3 , 1989. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5: 00 p.m. , April 18, 1989, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Planning Division Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Determination of on-Significance-Mitigated "Taco Time Offi Building Page 2 PUBLICATION DATE: April 3 , 1989 DATE OF DECISION: March 29, 1989 SIGNATURES: R d'"G. Ne7 son Lynn G tm n emporary Acting Community Public orks Director ' Development Director DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: Taco Time Office Building ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-125-88 APPLICATION NUMBER: SA-125-88 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of an office building for use as the corporate headquarters of the Taco Time restaurant chain. The site will be developed with a 7 , 792 square feet office building together with a small storage building consisting of 1, 920 square feet for storage for some of the products needed by the company's restaurant. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The is located at the property northeast corner of the intersection of Monroe Avenue S.E. and the Maple Valley Highway. RECOMMENDATIONS: A Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated be issued with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant incorporate oil/water separators into the design of the storm water drainage system proposed for the site; 2 . That the applicant and/or owner, in order to avoid the potential for future adverse impacts on the aquifer, shall provide the City with restrictive covenants requiring a review of all uses of the property be reviewed by the Utility Engineering Division of the City's Public Works Department prior to occupying the building. These covenants shall be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of a building permit; 3 . That the applicant, in order to mitigate traffic impacts, shall provide channelization on the east leg of the Monroe Avenue S.E. at the intersection with the Maple Valley Highway. This shall be accomplished by stripping the street to allow for separate lanes for right and left turns onto the Maple Valley Highway; 4 . That the applicant, in order to mitigate construction impacts, periodically water down the site to reduce dust and provide the City with a revolving cash bond in the amount of $2000. 00 for street cleaning; and +-".•-.+.yu .ivaa a'acu.�LL1 C.7 Taco .Tjme Office Buildinc_, ;page 2 5. That the applicant voluntarily bond for an amount of $12 , 608 . 00 as their fair share of future traffic mitigation measures that are being identified in a Traffic Benefit Zone for this transportation corridor. This contribution is recommended to be in the form of a bond valid for at least a period of five (5) years. Note: In the event that the proponent's fair share contribution for necessary traffic mitigation measures is determined to be less than the $12 , 608 .00, the City shall refund the amount in excess of the established fair share contribution. In no case shall the proponent be required to contribute more than $12, 608. 00. mmdoc . , 11 ,,,,., a' .L „ . ,I,NOTIIICE . k k:_, • .1 . /.,... , . . . t...: ENVIRONMENTAL . . • ..!...: • 1 . D L RATI N . " . • .4.i.,. 1 . , . tz 1 . . . • 1 ." .. . ECF-125-88, SA-125-88 • n, . APPLICATION NO. ,; TACO TIME OFFICE BUILDING • i.• APPLICANT• ' . 1, • PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN OFFICE BUILDING FOR USE AS THE CORPORATE F' • HEADQUARTERS OF THE TACO TIME RESTAURANT CHAIN. THE SITE WILL BE i' • • DEVELOPED WITH A 7,792 SQ.FT. OFFICE BUILDING TOGETHER WITH A y'• • I gtg tig 114Ic �,�CATION AND/OR ADDRESS SMALL STORAGE BUILDING 0 of a intersection of CONSISTING OF 1,920 f; Monroe Avenue SE and the Maple Valley SQ.FT. FOR STORAGE OF V, Highway. SOME OF THE PRODUCTS is• • NEEDED BY THE COMPANY'S � li RESTAURANT, , . • • POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS i;i. OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. M• . 1 1 • THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES JDOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. 'I;' v. i AN ENVIRONMENTAL,IMPACT STATEMENT • WILL >j WILL NOT . _ , • BE REQUIRED. • THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. • COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY • APRIL 18, 1989 , AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY ' - BE BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER • BY 5:00 P.M., FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. o DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE • WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. p CE:R.TI F I.CAT:I O.N . , a,r ' S. ll �., LA1. o , IIEREIY CERTIFY; THAT '�kf-r . 6(� (s) COPIES OF ?' TIIE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED;=tXBY ME' Ill'. ':::�`.�-F'Pj' 3; �' .CUN.SPICUOUS. PLACES ON OR•',NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY -ON'.! ::i-' ARiL 3/ I98.c AT1tST: Subsc 1 i".. !;, "• .{,< ' •:...,.:i)' • .•..,,!,.;.. . 1 A:.. r bed end sworn to ;); ,i'. �g:I ore mZ+� e' l :;,; I.' ;, Notery Public In {o t. * ,`, , and, r`the Stisleoi: wn*t oi:6,:':..-.. `i;• e residing in 17' pJ, ,:.: t.:; •!' - ',1.• . gin gal A; $i 0 CITY OF RENTON .ELL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION MEMORANDUM March 29, 1988 TO: Files FROM: Jeanette Samek-Mckague RE: Conversation with Paul Casey Taco Time Headquarters Located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Monroe Avenue S.E. and the Maple Valley Highway File SA-125-88 Spoke to Paul Casey regarding the Environmental Review Committee's action on the Taco Time office development. Briefly went over the conditions, with major emphasis placed on the voluntary contribution to off-set traffic impacts in the N.E. 3rd/N.E. 4th Street corridor. Question arose as to whether the applicant refused to pay the traffic mitigation fee at this time, could the City come back at the time of building permit submittal or issuance requesting the fee. We discussed the state's vesting laws. He will contact Gary Norris regarding the progress being made on the approval of the Benefit District. The second major area of discussion was the site plan review approval. Explained to Mr. Casey that the Site Plan Review Committee review the project report next week. We discussed various measures including the blue metal roof; the rearrangement of the layout of the storage building to eliminate the roll-up door on the south elevation, reducing the noise impacts and disturbance to the adjacent single family residences; providing an additional foot or so of landscaping along the east property line to increase the landscaping buffer; and contacting the fire prevention bureau regarding the need for three fire hydrants for the project. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 j j� The Casey Troup E Architects 10116 36th Ave. Ct. SW, Suite 203, Tacoma, WA 98499 • (206) 584-5207 March 28, 1989 Jeanette Samek-McKague Senior Planner City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Storage Building roof top Condensers at the Taco Time Office Building site on Maple Valley Highway ' Ms. McKague, According to your request, we discussed with the owner the negative impact that the roof mounted refrigeration condensers might have on the single family residences behind the site. The solution to this problem will be to incorporate water cooled condensers that will be located inside the building . Therefore, roof top mounted condensers will not be required , which eliminates the potential noise problem. Thank you for your assistance with this project and call if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely , The Casey Group Architects Paul J . Casey A I A c. c. Jack Love Taco Time PLANNING DIVIS1 ?I? CITY OF RE TON MAR 2 9 1989 ECEHNE Cr CITY RENT-ON ••LL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION March 31, 1988 Paul Casey 10116 36th Ave. Ct. S.W. #203 Tacoma, WA 98499 Re: Taco Time Office Building • Maple Valley Highway and Monroe Ave. SE ECF; SA-125-88 Dear Mr. Casey: This letter is to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above referenced project. The Committee on March 29, 1989 decided that your project may be issued a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant incorporate oil/water separators into the design of the storm water drainage system proposed for the site; 2. That the applicant and/or owner, in order to avoid the potential for future adverse impacts on the aquifer, shall provide the City with restrictive covenants requiring a • review of all uses of the property be reviewed by the Utility Engineering Division of the City's Public Works Department prior to occupying the building. These covenants shall be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of a building permit; 3. That the applicant, in order to mitigate traffic impacts, shall provide channelization on the east leg of the Monroe Avenue S.E. at the intersection with the Maple Valley Highway. This shall be accomplished by stripping the street to allow for separate lanes for right and left turns onto the Maple Valley Highway; 4. That the applicant, in order to mitigate construction impacts, periodically water down the site to reduce dust and provide the City with a revolving cash bond in the amount of $2000.00 for street cleaning; and 5. That the applicant voluntarily bond for an amount of $12,608.00 as their fair share of future traffic mitigation measures that are being identified in a Traffic Benefit Zone for this transportation corridor. This contribution is recommended to be in the form of a bond valid for at least a period of five (5) years. r_. .... ,...... ......... ... . . .. ..... ...._�.. .ar ._ i re tr;�- p:r .. N. ....,., _- ..,i.. ....... .. .. 1 � .,,_.,.c.- ..4.6 ..a ..�� .).... .,_C :,Yr.. a <;n- p``u ,�+ ,•.=T$: ,..._e .,__,...- -. ._.... ., ..,.-,.,,..o,.,:,...?'..:".,�, _ ;. 'r 4:)7 ems. , r..r iti }, 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Taco Time Office Build' March 30, 1989 Page 2 Note: In the event that the proponent's fair share contribution for necessary traffic mitigation measures is determined to be less than the $12,608.00, the City shall, refund the amount in excess of the established fair share contribution. In no. case shall the proponent be required to contribute more than $12,608.00. Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required fifteen (15) day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The comment period will end April 18, 1989. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required fourteen (14) day appeal period. In addition, by the end of the comment period, we should be able to establish a tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner should a public hearing be necessary. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at 235- 2550 and ask for Jeanette Samek-McKague or me. For the Environmental Review Committee, Sincerel , Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:mjp • • • cc: John Dobson 6611 114 Pl. S.E. Renton, WA 98056 • • ' awl y1 iett'" w� _ rt_ p.!h� ':.l`:::a:.i.`:.�;,;�:..• ..1i`'i.� A'Jr.n..- - .a: r,I • „ CITY 1 _ .;i RENTON ..LL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION • March 30, 1988 • Washington State • Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504 Re: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith are copies of Environmental Determinations issued on March 29, 1989: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED TACO TIME OFFICE BUILDING /ECF; SA-125-88 Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of an office building for use as the corporate headquarters of the Taco Time restaurant chain. The site will be developed with a 7,792 square feet office building together with a small storage building consisting of 1,920 square feet for storage for some of the products needed by the company's restaurant. The property is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Monroe Avenue S.E. and the Maple Valley Highway. • OLYMPIC DOOR & MILLWORK WAREHOUSE/OFFICE FACILITY ECF; SA-008-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction & operation of a warehouse/office facility (36,000 sq.ft./3,200 sq.ft.). Warehouse will be used to store wood products (e.g. doors, trim, sash, etc.). The property is located in the southwest corner of the East Valley Highway and S.W. 27th Street (2700 block East Valley Highway). BRANDAL WOOD ECF; R; PP-015-89 Applicant seeks to: 1) obtain a non-project, programmatic rezone of the 2.74 acre subject property from G-1, General Use, to R-1, Single-Family Residential Use; and 2) create a 21 lot preliminary plat for future development with single-family residences. The property is located at 2113 Duvall Avenue N.E. The fifteen.(15) day comment period for these projects will end on April 18, 1989. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. :1 ,p r;Y . 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Environmental Determ:^^'ions March 30, 1989 Page 2 DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE CITY INITIATED REZONES UTILITY/PARKS PROPERTIES ECF-022-89 Application to rezone thirteen (13) parcels of property owned by the City of Renton Utility Engineering Division at the following locations: 1) Well No. 5, NE 24th St. & Jones Rd.; 2) Highlands Reservoir Site, NE 12th St.; 3) Maplewood Reservoir Site, SE 5th St.; 4) West Hill Reservoir Site, 84th Ave. S. & NW 4th St.; 5) Rolling Hills Reservoir Site, SW corner of Puget Dr. & Edmonds Ave.; 6) S. Talbot Hill Pump Station, S. 43rd St.; 8) Heather Downs, Union Ave. NE south of NE 4th St.; 9) Mount Olivet Pump Station, NE corner of Bronson & NE 3rd; 10) Well No. 4 Site, NE 12th & Sunset Blvd.; 11) Windsor Hills Pump Station, Sunset Blvd. NE; 12) Honey Creek Sewer, N of NE Sunset Blvd.; 13) Highlands Reservoir No. 3, 9401 NE Sunset Blvd. • SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM/RESIDENTIAL DOCK AMENDMENTS ECF-028-89 Application to revise the City's Shoreline Master Program section on residential docks with respect to dock specifications and criteria for review of variances for docks exceeding the specified length in the Master Program. The Determinations are final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 p.m. on April 17, 1989. Any appeal must state clearly in writing why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. If you have questions, please call Jeanette Samek-McKague or me at 235-2550. Sincerely, (:),24)t. Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:mjp cc: Mr. Gerald W. Marbett, King County Bldg. & Land Division Mr. Gregory M. Bush, Metro Department of Wildlife Mr. Joe Robels, Department of Fisheries `"". ��+r • S ..• "'1',�s `,'- :-$'k. '•+".fie; — AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION find-ce y Renner ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY EaL YNEwS • Kent Edition t • Auburn Edition Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition , Renton Edition , Auburn Edition , (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period.The annexed notice a Public llotice was published on April 3, 1989 .(5 215 ' The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the • sum of $ 3q Subscribed and sworn to before me this 17 t h day of Ap r i 1 19 Nota Public for the'State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VDN#87 Revised 11/86 - 7 NOTICE OF ENVIRL,.idENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMIT FEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated for the following pro- jects under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. TACO TIME OFFICE BUILDING (ECF; SA-125-88) Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of an office building for use as the corporate headquarters of the Taco Time restaurant chain. The site will be developed with a 7,792 square e.., office building together with a small storage building consisting of 1,920 square feet. The property is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Monroe Ave- nue S.E. and the Maple Valley Highway. OLYMPIC DOOR & MILLWORK WARE- HOUSE/OFFICE FACILITY (ECF; SA-008- 89) App' ant seeks site plan approval for the construction&operation of a warehouse of- Public Notice fice facility (36,000 sq.ft.13,200 sq f ). Written comments received after 5:00 p.m., Warehouse will be used to store wood April 18, 1989 will not be considered. A products (e.g. doors, trim, sash, etc.). The fourteen (14) day appeal period will corn- property is located in the southwest corner mence following the finalization of DNS-M. of the East Valley Highway and S.W. 27th The mitigation measures imposed by the Street (2700 block East Valley Highway). City of Renton's Environmental Review BRANDAL WOOD (ECF; R; PP-015-89) Committee are available at the Planning Applicant seeks to: 1)obtain a non-project, Division of the Community Development programmatic rezone of the 2.74 acre sub- Department, Municipal Building Renton, ject property from G-1, General Use, to Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. R-1, Single-Family Residential Use; and 2) Published April 3, 1989 Valley 4y create a 21 lot preliminary plat for future News R5215 development with single-family residences. The property is located at 2113 Duvall Ave- nue N.E. This decision will be finalized in 15 days. N0Ti E OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERM -`°LTION / ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 11* RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following projects under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. TACO TIME OFFICE BUILDING / CF; SA-125-88 Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of an office building for use as the corporate headquarters of the Taco Time restaurant chain. The site will be developed with a 7,792 square foot office building together with a small storage building consisting of 1, 920 square feet. The property is located at. the northeast corner of the intersection of Monroe Avenue S.E. and the Maple Valley Highway. OLYMPIC DOOR & MILLWORK WAREHOUSE/OFFICE FACILITY ECF; SA-008-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction & operation of a warehouse/office facility (36, 000 sq. ft./3 ,200 sq. ft. ) . Warehouse will be used to store wood products (e.g. doors, trim, sash, etc. ) . The property is located in the southwest corner of the East Valley Highway and S.W. 27th Street (2700 block East Valley Highway) . BRANDAL WOOD ECF; R; PP-015-89 Applicant seeks to: 1) obtain a non-project, programmatic rezone of the 2 . 74 acre subject property from G-1, General Use, to R-1, Single- Family Residential Use; and 2) create a 21 lot preliminary plat for future development with single-family residences. The property is located at 2113 Duvall Avenue N.E. This decision will be finalized in 15 days. Written comments received after 5: 00 p.m. , April 18, 1989 will not be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of DNS-M. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Planning Division of the Community Development Department, Municipal Building Renton, Washington 98055, . Phone: 235-2550. Published: April 3, 1989 �O �r CITY OF RENTON hal DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION March 13, 1989 Paul Casey 10116 36th Avenue Court S.W. #203 Tacoma, Washington 98499 RE: Taco Time Office Building Maple Valley Highway and Monroe Avenue S.E. File ECF-125-88, SA-125-88 Dear Mr. Casey: The Environmental Review Committee met on your project today and determined that before they could issue a Determination for the above referenced project that a traffic study should be prepared addressing items identified in the Traffic Engineering comments. The study should address the following: • Identification of the Level of Service at the intersection of Monroe Avenue S.W. and Maple Valley Highway. In a conversation with one of the Traffic Engineering Specialists, Clint Morgan, Mr. Morgan stated that this should be done for the AM/PM peak traffic periods; • Identification of whether channelization upgrading is required or needed on the east leg of the intersection (Monroe Avenue S.E.); • Identification of proper street width to meet City standards; and • Identification of the number of trips generated by the project per the ITE Manual. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 • Paul Casey Taco Time Office Building March 13, 1989 In addition, staff have suggested that the following items of information be past on to you: Traffic Engineering: Street Lighting plan designed according to City standards will be required. Design Engineering Staff reviewed the soils report for the project and made the following • comments: -"Under the pavement design portion of the report the soils engineer refers to gravel base as needed pending their review. The City reserves the right to direct the contractor to place gravel base within the City right of way whether the soils engineer requires it." and -"The soils engineers recommendation for pavement section within the roadway of 3" AC and 6" crushed rock is not within the City's minimum pavement section. Should be: 4" AC (2-2"lifts required) 6" crushed rock 12" gravel base (as determined by City). The Committe also withheld making a Determination today until comments are received from the City's consultants, CH2M Hill regarding the supplemental information provided by GeoEngineers, Inc. with respect to the impacts between the proposed development and the decomposition of the residue from the Olympic Pipeline spill and the City's Aquifer. The Committee will review the project again once the City's Traffic Engineer reviews and comments on the requested traffic study. We expect to have an answer from our consultant on the supplemental information from the geotechnical engineer. Should you have any questions, please call me or Jeanette Samek-McKague of my office at 235-2550. For the Environmental Review Committee Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrato DKE:McK:mjp CITY OF RENTON 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH RENTON, WA 98055 206-235-2501 FAX# 235-2513 DATE 3// S7 F� PAGES (EXCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET) ATTENTION: i 0 FROM: �C A i r ' INTER-OFFICE MEMO TO: r-V p,J EJ L DATE ipku >r \ 1� FROM: �20�1v�Q o QP ��Ck V.._.-E.:-,,--) 1.(--2,-ca, ‘..y.....-V-QA &VCSI\J . • • NYC c 'Q,Vv:f.a 9� t�e'w."tJ..� -\-e-•� `^k l c . �..,_- c ) o-- aX6-J ��.�L�a�c, ,per }t> - , `J 1�.e a `� c� `.J.' "b19— c� n �-u '..--19-e1:--e--t-,0 15t2)=..tc. 4 U a•-,.�., �-. , ain 1d� Rocs, 6 G x,►,) 'sy /tp--eRk.1-lam -• fa\_\,,,,..,,,,,_ 2,..s0 %,_.,_,-it„.,_,s10\,.. VI) 0 •• (13L.19.9 \SL-e•::`— . 6es-3 sV‘-- '''(2.-----.. --Z1-1- 1ACCI4Lk----' ..j....1-4-%04-42....t.,......4"..-.X(Y., .. B ch ` -, �L �- n�� `-I� C .CC(,) , fish-4 z--e , 's:' -r,?+,r :>'-' - �:r - - '9Y:v -':t'`':%. ''?'ya ? , �•r�'�;.:1::>a !I i.'f,7;r; .ttJr ear `�<rr .{ ,1':: ' r.+`;? :4: �" t. .1 .?V Jn •kii Ai)..�'' '• , -:J'! ,. .)..f'i ,'r'ai' r i' t. :i�r �* 1• .��'- •'a'. '''r'..' tit Y i�;;J a: y I,l� �� 'Y 4 . '7 r a,;y. rr:'ti '1 :'i • a ',ice•, ) •1 , JC [ IL :�': N J- 'i �}4 ''Ji.. +i 1 x 'L, i'r4, L 1, ry,-.. a ( ,) ,.,thy"• •�ry y �'''' i i, lg i `�a i r d } ''1 � Y 3 ''r. 4 Y'+` ''vn V / ;;f. 4r 4� ri ^F 'tJt:'..1 r' •1 '1 r::. is Il �.1 1l � ' •.y'• +f' 4'�.' ii a:' [ `J G i �G4? i z" )) 1. i .r.Y•'s :..'J' .id {. -irr {i q 1 4 r'4 �1 ru ` ! ^r. '`.. inp,rL t3'' '� I:, 4i 5,.. i :A fit' 4i1 +�"'T8 l (� t7 5 •Y .�J off. iiY�`' 1 + • ' •.i J. "i I.J��i: i a f' ✓a 1'i ,J rSJ A- J' r .i '4 J': q n dT t •'x.) v :rZ:a, iE ik +l.b is`4�'.:!•, i VI',,:. 1 �.:.v t-r.i t. J r J tY° ``'riiJ. p ;r :1 5'a:'•r: h;.�a, :a7 },ram..', .J :,v ':tl V "4 $ �{ f i•i:•� r ( ^a .hi„i"Are .ky.. 7 S': I A+ 5� Jft" :T i YA r). P�",A, S ��} Y� `?i;: Jn C 4 J•t. / k .:7�' S , .k.i• r,9 a•f., 4.•Y`M 7 alJ. �V t PL x !�` �p • ti i� A '"d1� tr; ;J I i'vsy', 'b`' r s'i' a5 'i,+. 'h� 1 r ¢ I ;1'r' ,i '\• rri' :Jt L r',gyG J nl ��}} i.y1 Y J: bb '^ir •f JS.• YJ ef' "�,'Y' 1 +t 1'""c J. �t:l r' r` i' "!' 'ri •z 4 i`f• y'. Y �'iJ A'p} g i^' d'i Y., i'..:' ,2r rif, � .b:. r r Y 1 r t. J'I Hi i' 'J " �r .;:7 •. t• r.:Y g't:i w�1.'.r' •�. ''v�t �� L r �y •R• .Y 1• t. r•J^_ '�; l'n ri:' i: •s .i=, q: .•t,. ri', ; W' Y fir,. (.!<t, :>+�' 'f.l- .a.n 'e a'i' ':r' i yS 1t J .,�. .F rf' 5: $.� S .J i . r. i �?' jjJJ S: 1��,.:JM'' N"' ,S+ `R ;'�(. •'," •9i;�:^a/L. !. ..• a f--.. r a. i,...'. .,,.... . J;1,,.:{" 'i1� <iu .k .k,� 'tli v sf I ;Lr 1�rt hY. h+r` A•' .'17 'i •I. 1`iN fit., •7 •'a .'a, h' 3 if t =Y '.fir. x `.i� 1 t• A•1 Y.. .r� 'k'�t ' 't,' a.• .i j �'4 �:1; ,i> t �} r"• 17•. s.a F'' z ;�"�, .` : rJ„ ` it r,t• l am+ V'. y Y.+ ` �t r 1 it. , 7 ( J:x '1• J ,�,` • :a�''' ii'. 9',,• trtr 1 L (. JTl 1. r! .M1 7 f�1.': •a'.. 't: •t 6 :mR L4� r1. ).rx:. -i n y ?'tti �; '.na ,L` r� r fi(.,, d J V..rt:• i •x - >V 1r�:r r 1••� t�t t s>Y�i • p j" 1'J; .F s /�Y r ,1 �}, Y1': p 6 1' ,,{y Y ry it. .S.' . �.,`),r•% t,t, sr': l Y .T .If;'Y { d i' 4; a,, Yr• :''4 r• t- 'f,, to 11 •L �• .i+ d 'J' r.. '•t .:?:;;Al:'::::.",,' 1! 11 i• v pp qq i Y -i: '1 :; r } 1. �" 1 ' i ":J ,y rc' li 5 / rf 'J. a! N:' i a j': r., � nib '( s' '!• r .:y-...: I.T.. ,.,1•.,r p' h"�' '`/r �J J R �M1 G.,'i.• .a' i G tr 2i� �n6' : ' 9 F'v' J+ +!N y f: ft.. i f 7, ii, i.rr, t \' �'Y�.� ,r :sir-'a _ ,.i..v it .� � •L G'i' ,\� }. .,i�' r vv a .: ;Jtl .V.t .S iii'• ',4, r r •) h ti i �. 7�YY",e.^ :�rfw '-S 'f -1 '�f i' • • i,f" 'a'J iY C •s^-r" J.J 7 t*. �4 . A, (1 t�' k ti,• jrU ..\ .tb d- �.,. a J••.. •Yrl - J'.� • t'e'�. 'j''i 7 b. 'Yf i � f W^:` • 4', RY :,."7'';, ;,r. t:fi•:, fir•.'.f,r 'Y, r .�. ,y�y. ..fvni�'' .M :J S f, Ci 77 .•3" } v� vJ;a t ,,yy ,`fd ;�,'r t,i " t ,,; G •t.r ':i� Fr` r.>� Card r s' ,1' : .. ,�"��'-r�.,�, ':Y' .it i C Fes: "[', w, gg i - 1•a,,1 tA v Y Y�is :Y' ,r »r N,rii _i ti- ! si`'L'�' Fi 'vd h $ J� .r 7 1 ��., 'Y ..1,� .7r, f" ��n r. fir- ,. ,, t',: t' V '"n i 1 ` .try. 1 (. k il;.n f :t ri v+ �J•lip •th tV'�� rs 6i.. -Yr; '3 �it :T' :i,i{ ,'L-� r` ''.fi.' •J.Ul'�J1' +'u'' tG.. • r, J 'rt 11 "F'vL I i" i:tl }f {"� { .Y •'4. ` i J;. ::Y:; itl.. �F s r�,k'� tr,. J '•i i L d �'r.. I.if`4: J Y 'fki, `f GC r i A,V! 'y 1 ) i. 1G S ,l n!' ar ,r:�: t ,r,t; „ •v / •r t jy ' . } �i' of 'a:<5r K'' ! 3:., .y,.0 .1 t j 1', i'F. (i '.,..rd!' ,r . . 1p :x j•t 4.' H,i,, i"�c� f .fir.. ,�. ',•fir !a • • e 3 t' 4.. {j y ,� ( L-` .i$. d t'- }�. 1 L 'v•. rr S. r• l ! r i. r,•- i sa 1. v-F. 4 ,iT, r• }zl. J s 'J' �4: ,t� .{.na _ r 1.• '4. ( A bS�t G. t J •1�` L W4„ q. r i• !� ) :f a. :[L ;,.., :Tit. �• F.•.4 i�t:r. .R '�t{; :?{ Iva:•''?i! .i •1' ''.:Lr.T �t• r :.:... nr �4,• TT,, .:ti Zi ,Ir,. rir� +k' 1-. 'r: r V t 1'" .•Y !t• ,1't L i... l'U, � 1. f .1:. Y r. • t: l.ia4' I:'I',� �JlV t C.C.. . . i'�IUiV • i • /...- G l'CK off'' ^��,. . CITY OF RENTON i. � W • Geo Engineers '� li2.va 7 FEB 24 1989 A ECEIVE —) February 21, 1989 • Consulting Geotechnical Engineers and Geologists Olympic Pipe Line Company I P.O. Box 236 Renton, Washington 98057 Attention: Mr. William Mulkey • , ' Property Assessment Supplement Dobson Property • Northeast Corner of Maple Valley Hwy • and Monroe Avenue Southeast Maplewood Neighborhood Renton, Washington File No. 0894-02-4 GeoEngineers received a request from Mr. Paul Casey regarding clarification of our assessment of residual contamination on Mr. Dobson's I property at the northeast corner of the intersection between •Maple Valley Highway and Monroe Avenue Southeast in Renton, Washington. We .provided our initial assessment of residual contamination on the Dobson Property in • our report to you dated January 13, 1989. We understand that the City of 1 Renton's Technical Review Committee has additional questions • related to I planned site development and residual contamination. Those questions are ' • re—phrased here: 1. Does. the planned paving affect how contamination will be dispersed beneath the site? 2. If the site is paved, will residual contamination be forced into the aquifer? What will be the effect of site paving? As described in our report of January 13, 1989, the residual fuel contamination is present between the depths of 18 and 20 feet. This depth • corresponds with a zone that is located near and below the typical low ground water levels. .Site development activities that do not extend into the zone of contamination should not affect the distribution of the residual contaminants. • GeoEngineers,Inc. 2405140th Ave.NE,Suite 105 \ Bellevue,WA 98005 \ Telephone(206)746-5200 • `':,. Pax.(2(6)746-5068 • `Hba.y,;,7` • „4, - - ^ •. ••fir• _ .�. �r...... •I>...:.:aS:�:li', ^,1nnT"?'E�.. .r•. kr:�'1�4 :•''..r'•�h - �'1' r. ..,. .,r.. .r; .t • .14. . .,: L f ,�• ,.jr Olympic Pipe Line Co. February 21, 1989 Page 2 Paving of the site will reduce infiltration of precipitation into the subsoils. Infiltrating surface water can mobilize contaminants that may be present in soils located above the water table. In the case of the Dobson Property, the residual contamination is within a zone that is periodically inundated by fluctuations in ground water level. Changes in the rate of infiltration of surface water at this site will not likely have a significant impact on the residual contamination, in our opinion. ) To summarize, paving of the site is not expected to have any measurable ` effect upon the residual contamination. Please call if you have any questions about this letter. Yours very truly, GeoEngineers, I Stephen C. Perrigo Waste Management Specialist C{ C James A. Miller, P.E. Principal SCP:JAM:cs ✓cc: Mr. Paul Casey The Casey Group Architects 10116 36th Ave. S.W. , Ste 203 Tacoma, WA 98499 I-r-e off' `1/ • V. b-�1'cD W GeoEnineers 212y8 vor- February 21, 1989 Consulting Geotechnical Engineers and Geologists Olympic Pipe Line Company P.O. Box 236 Renton, Washington 98057 Attention: Mr. William Mulkey Property Assessment Supplement Dobson Property Northeast Corner of Maple Valley Hwy and Monroe Avenue Southeast Maplewood Neighborhood Renton, Washington File No. 0894-02-4 • GeoEngineers received a request from Mr. Paul Casey regarding clarification of our assessment of residual contamination on Mr. Dobson's property at the northeast corner of the intersection.between Maple Valley Highway and Monroe Avenue Southeast in Renton, Washington. We provided our initial assessment of residual contamination on the Dobson Property in our report to you dated January 13, 1989. We understand that the City of Renton's Technical Review Committee has additional questions related to planned site development and residual contamination. Those questions are re—phrased here: 1. Does the planned paving affect how contamination will be dispersed beneath the site? 2. If the site is paved, will residual contamination be forced into the aquifer? What will be the effect of site paving? As described in our report of January 13, 1989, the residual fuel contamination is present between the depths of 18 and 20 feet. This depth corresponds with a zone that is located near and below the typical low ground water levels. Site development activities that do not extend into the zone of contamination should not affect the distribution of the residual contaminants. PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON GcoEngineers,Inc. ® , MAR 2405 140th Ave.NE,Suite 105 1989 Bellevue,WA 98005 CE 0 (1,/J Telephone(206)746-5200 U F,cX.(206)746-5068 . -r Olympic Pipe Line Co. February 21, 1989 Page 2 Paving of the site will reduce infiltration of precipitation into the subsoils. Infiltrating surface water can mobilize contaminants that may be present in soils located above the water table. In the case of the Dobson Property, the residual contamination is within a zone that is periodically inundated by fluctuations in ground water level. Changes in the rate of infiltration of surface water at this site will not likely have a significant impact on the residual contamination, in our opinion. To summarize, paving of the site is not expected to have any measurable effect upon the residual contamination. Please call if you have any questions about this letter. Yours very truly, GeoEngineers, I 2911k— Stephen C. Perrigo Waste Management Specialist James A. Miller, P.E. Principal , SCP:JAM:cs ;/cc: Mr. Paul Casey The Casey Group Architects 10116 36th Ave. S.W. , Ste 203 Tacoma, WA 98499 Ii %o CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU Earl Clymer, Mayor Fire Marshal: Glen G. Gordon Chief: A. Lee Wheeler MEMORANDUM- DATE: February 8, 1989 TO: Jeanette Samek-McKague - Zoning Research Technician FROM: Glen G. Gordon - Fire Marshal \1)4. SUBJECT: Taco Time Office Building Jeanette: Thank you for forwarding the attached report for my review. Unfortunately, the Fire Department does not have a geotechnical engineer to evaluate the soil, so as to make a determination. Therefore, I can't provide any comments referencing this project. However, I would suggest the City contact CH2M Hill, to serve as a reviewing agency for the City. GGG:mbt Attachment PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON D FE B 8 1989 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2642 M UU U �J�lj Jj 2 i d Q i NOIN38 dO MI0 (My tivg haarimartey) 99,3---0/ 67-?] . -----W410-5NINNVId- ' ___ e 1 _ ii ,LTr4v14�ty 00.... r vuvtl7aw j s - 7/1 9i IQ _ -2 ' ii ___job 1v 3 � -0 fii -75V-17739019----77,e2J 2_L -219:1- Zirci .5._q_ i� ,1. - -- �- ( 1A 3 -ir rj -ITi►ar%) i , - Q ro—,.ice p 9 I1 W A 1zraaro (I - 1� I8 11(7-ar - ally x.-- -wiripi , o -,1 i ainir 1 T L—To $ y—A. N3T7Ts(71 11 9(1412X21 a WPra ►1 i -I' --71-711 :ei -- --Mery k co'0-f 1'il -ya4j 111 ►r►47 - s 51 terra�► a mi i?i9 ry Km r7-9►9 f.1-:30r9 tool J IQ $1 -9rnicr�► -wig ��� �� -9 r► 1T 71.52)5?Q, i 1 1 a . $ ; i f- II i 1 r The Casey ( )up LIEUTC OF TE1- 116 i]DTTLL U.. Architects 10116 36th Ave. Ct. SW, Suite 203 Tacoma, WA 98499 DATE 1/xl� JOB NO. ATTENTI N }wy I /A�/,tJe- TO ( 1-1-1/ OF 1 Ls-Cc) LI 1 rc_-o 11 MS. k - pLm..) 0t0c- APT, iL.-Q I Lie--1- ate! Ize‘,-1--r0 0 it c)A 9 3c WE ARE SENDING YOU A Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: — ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order l� Go�`� COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 'i 1 �� �o �--t— PClrNo�G DIVISION REN•TQN , FEB 1 1989 0 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval 0 Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution - g As requested 0 Returned for corrections 0 Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO SIGNED: 9e,k....., PRODUCT 2403 f,e)Inc,clown,Mass.01471. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. I 1 1 1 REPORT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES PROPOSED TACO TIME OFFICE FACILITY 1 RENTON, WASHINGTON FOR TACO TIME 1 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON FEB 1 1989 1) Geo tO_inn• Engineers 1 January 27, 1989 Taco Time 1911 Maple Valley Highway Renton, Washington 98055 1 Attention: Mr. Jack Love Gentlemen: 1 We are pleased to submit three copies of our "Report, Geotechnical Engineering Services , Proposed Taco Time Office Facility, Renton, 1 Washington." The scope of our services is described in our Confirming Agreement dated January 17, 1989. 1 We appreciate the opportunity to serve you on this project. Please contact •us if you have any questions regarding this report or other y aspects of the project. Yours very truly, 1 Geo gineers, Inc. /20-44./.401"-- 1 Gary W. Henderson Principal 1 DWA:GWH:wd 1 cc: The Casey Group Architects 10116 36th Ave. S.W. Tacoma, WA 98499 Attn: Mr. Paul Casey File No. 1526-01-3 1 Y' . 4 s �. i�4:'y .p4yi _1. , r„ < f Q% 'GeoEngineers TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. INTRODUCTION 1 1 SITE CONDITIONS 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 3 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3 GENERAL 3 1 SITE PREPARATION AND FILL PLACEMENT 4 Structural Fill 4 1 FOUNDATION SUPPORT 5 FLOOR SLAB SUPPORT 6 PAVEMENT DESIGN 7 USE OF THIS REPORT 7 List of Figures Figure No. VICINITY MAP 1 APPENDIX A Page No. MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION A-1 DRILLING AND SOIL SAMPLING PROGRAM A-1 1 List of Appendix Figures Figure No. SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM A-1 1 KEY TO BORING LOG SYMBOLS A-2 LOGS OF MONITOR WELLS A-3 thru A-7 1 1 1 i 1 �7 W777 -1011, Geo kaEngineers REPORT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES PROPOSED TACO TIME OFFICE FACILITY RENTON, WASHINGTON FOR TACO TIME INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our geotechnical engineering services for the proposed Taco Time office facility to be located in the 1 Maplewood area of Renton, Washington. The property is bordered to the south by Maple Valley Highway (SR 169) and to the west by Monroe Avenue Southeast and is shown on Figure 1. Developed residential properties 1 border the site to the north and east. The site is currently vacant. Proposed site development will include a two—story timber framed office building, a one—story timber framed storage building, and an asphalt paved drive and parking areas. The maximum design column load used for our analyses is 50 kips. We understand no significant grade changes are planned. Subsurface soil in the Maplewood area has experienced hydrocarbon contamination due to a leak in 1986 from Olympic Pipe Line Company's (OPLC) line. During the investigation and remediation of this problem, GeoEngineers, Inc. , as engineer for OPLC, developed substantial subsurface information in the area of Taco Time's proposed development. The purpose of our services is to provide conclusions and recommenda— tions for the proposed site development by evaluating subsurface geo— technical conditions using available data. Our specific scope of services is as follows: 1. Describe the subsurface conditions based on the available information in our files from the previous work performed on the site. 2. Develop site preparation and earthwork recommendations for support of the structures and pavement areas, and evaluate the effects of weather and/or construction traffic on site soils. i F:'"• Geo.°,4,- eers i , 3. Provide foundation design recommendations including allowable soil bearing pressure and settlement estimates based on the- 1javailable information. 4. Provide recommendations for subgrade preparation for a slab—on— .] grade floor. 5. Provide impacts and remedial actions with respect to existing subsurface recovery and treatment components. 1 6. Provide recommendations for drainage systems in light of the 1 ground water conditions expected. 7. Develop recommendations for pavement subgrade support and provide design pavement sections for the areas to be paved. 1 SITE CONDITIONS EXISTING CONDITIONS 1 The site is an undeveloped, grass—covered, irregularly shaped parcel encompassing approximately 1.0 acre. The area is relatively flat and 1 � slopes southward toward the Cedar River. During investigation of the hydrocarbon spill, a number of monitor 1 wells were installed, both on and adjacent to the site. • All on—site monitor wells have now been legally abandoned by removing the casings and 1 filling the wells with bentonite. A subsurface hydrocarbon vapor recovery system and an abandoned gas line are the only remnants of OPLC's remedia— 1 tion activities that remain on site. The subsurface vapor recovery system consists of piping in a gravel filled trench. The gravel extends from about 3 to 4 feet below the ground surface to a depth of 10 to 12 feet. IThe top 3 to 4 feet of the trench was backfilled with uncompacted native silty soils with a visqueen barrier between these soils and the gravel. 1 The approximate location of the vapor recovery trench is shown in Figure 2. No as—builts were prepared during construction so that this location ' I 1 is not accurately documented. 1, 1 2 11 f 1 44+,.t ,4'. . �f �t,` 4d% Geo Engineers SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Our understanding of the subsurface soil conditions is based on - monitor wells drilled previously on the property (Figure 2) . Relevant features of that field exploration program, together with the boring logs, are presented in Appendix A. The upper soil on the western side of the site (Monitor Wells 5, 8, and 37) is medium stiff to stiff silt to a depth of 8 to 10 feet. Dense sands underlie the silt layer. The upper soil on the eastern side of the site (Monitor Wells 21 and 26) is loose to medium dense silty sand to a depth of approximately 5 feet, overlying dense sand and silty sand. No laboratory tests were performed on the site soils to determine their engineering properties since the previous site work focused on hydrocarbon investigation and remediation. Therefore engineering properties of the site soils were assumed based on the soil descriptions, blow counts, and experience with similar soils. Ground water was encountered at a depth of approximately 17 feet below the ground surface in those wells drilled in 1986 (Monitor Wells 5, 8, 21, and 26) . Monitor Well 37, drilled in November, 1988 did not encounter ground water to its total depth of 25.5 feet, although subsur— face soil was wet below 10 feet. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL We conclude that the proposed structures can be supported on shallow— spread footings provided that the site preparation work includes: (1) limited overexcavation of soil within the building foundation areas; and (2) backfill of these excavations with structural fill. A granular subbase may be necessary to support the asphalt parking and driveways. These requirements are discussed in detail below. The site soils possess a relatively high fines content and are consequently water—sensitive. It will be difficult, if not impossible, to properly compact these soils when wet. Therefore, the on—site soil will not be suitable for reuse as structural fill under wet conditions. Trafficability at the site under wet conditions is expected to be difficult and may result in considerable 3 CMu- Geok10,Engineers disturbance. We accordingly recommend that the earthwork for the project be completed during the drier summer months in order reuse on site soils- and therefore minimize grading costs. If wet weather construction is necessary, wet soil in building and pavement areas will need to be removed and replaced with imported material. This will substantially increase grading costs. SITE PREPARATION AND FILL PLACEMENT Prior to excavation, all grass and vegetation should be removed from 1 building and paving areas. We recommend that the office building footings and storage building footings bear on at least 2 feet and 18 inches of 1 structural fill, respectively. The excavations for the footings should extend at least 1 foot beyond the edge of the footing. We recommend all 1 excavations be performed with a smooth—edged bucket to minimize dis— turbance. We recommend that the 6—inch—thick base course described subsequently for building slabs be placed over 12 inches of structural fill or the native compacted subgrade soils. During dry weather, we recommend compacting the native subgrade soils such that 95 percent of the maximum dry density is achieved as determined by the ASTM D-1557 test procedure. 1 If the native soils are too wet to compact properly, we recommend that a minimum 12 inches of the native soils be removed and replaced with 1 suitable granular soils. Structural Fill: We recommend that all fill placed within the building and pavement areas be placed and compacted as structural fill. 1 Structural fill should be placed in individual horizontal lifts such that each lift is uniformly compacted to 95 percent of the maximum dry density as determined in accordance with the ASTM D-1557 test procedure. All structural fill material should be free of organics, debris and other deleterious material with no individual particles larger than 5 inches in diameter. As the amount of fines (that portion passing No. 200 sieve) increases, the soil becomes increasingly sensitive to small changes in moisture content and adequate compaction becomes more difficult 1 4 1 4;. Geoq Engineers to achieve, particularly during wet weather. Generally, soils containing more than about 5 percent fines by weight cannot be properly compacted _ I when the moisture content is more than a few percent from optimum. Most of the on—site soil possesses a fines content significantly 1 greater than 5 percent such that this material cannot be used successfully for structural fill except during periods of extended dry weather, and uprovided the in—situ moisture content is near optimum. If the soils are wet of optimum, it will be necessary to aerate the soil prior to using for structural fill. Conversely, if this soil is stockpiled such that significant air drying occurs, it may be necessary to moisture—condition the soil by adding water to achieve the necessary compaction. If the on site soils cannot be used as structural fill, we recommend importing a sand and gravel with less than 5 percent passing- the No. 200 sieve based on the fraction passing the 3/4—inch sieve. FOUNDATION SUPPORT We recommend that the office building footings be founded on at least 2 feet of structural fill and the storage building footings be founded on at least 18 inches of structural fill.. This fill should extend 1 foot horizontally beyond each side of the footing. Footings for the office and storage buildings should be founded at least 18 inches below 1 the lowest adjacent finished grade. Individual column footings should have a minimum width of 3 feet. Continuous strip footings should be at 1 least 16 inches wide. In order to provide more uniform support and reduce differential settlements, we recommend that exterior foundations consist 1 of continuous wall footings rather than isolated pad footings. The footings should be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 1500 pounds per square foot for dead plus long—term loads. This value may be 1 , increased by one third when considering earthquake or wind loads. Lateral loads can be resisted by friction on the base and passive resistance on the sides of the footings. Frictional resistance can be determined using 0.45 for the coefficient of base friction. Passive 1 resistance can be determined using an equivalent fluid density of 250 pounds per cubic foot (pcf), assuming that the soils around the footings 1 5 1 I • Geo401 Engineers for a distance of twice the footing depth consist of structural fill . compacted to 95 percent of maximum dry density. This value should be applied from one foot below the ground surface in areas which are not paved. In paved areas or beneath floor slabs, passive resistance can be 11 calculated from the bottom of the slab. The above values incorporate a factor of safety of about 1.5. We estimate that postconstruction settlements of interior column and perimeter wall footings will be on the order of 1/2 to 1 inch. We recommend that the structure be designed to tolerate at least 1/2 inch of differential settlement between adjacent column footings due to the variable subsurface conditions. Differential settlements up to 1/2 inch in 25 feet may be experienced along continuous wall footings. Approxi— mately 50 percent of the settlement should occur upon loading and the remaining settlement within about 30 days of load application. Disturbed soil not removed from the footing excavations prior to pouring concrete may result in increased settlement. It may be necessary to perform further overexcavation if the backfilled native soils in the hydrocarbon recovery trench are soft. If on site silty soils are used for structural fill, this material will be susceptible to dist urbance when wet. It may be necessary to pour a lean concrete "mud mat" or place a layer of rock on the bottom of the footings to protect the footing subgrade from water and/or wet weather during reinforcement bar placement. We recommend that the condition of all footing excavations be observed by a representative from our firm prior to and during placement of structural fill to confirm that the conditions are consistent with our recommendations contained within this report. I FLOOR SLAB SUPPORT We recommend a 6—inch—thick base course of densely compacted crushed rock or sand and gravel with less than 5 percent passing the No. 200 sieve as a capillary break and working surface. As described previously, we recommend that this base course be placed over 12 inches of structural fill or the native subgrade soils compacted to 95 percent based on 6 r-' 1 • Geo401 Engineers 1 ASTM D-1557 . A vapor barrier is recommended beneath the slabs. We estimate that postconstruction settlements should not exceed about 1 I1/2 inch for typical office floor loads. 1 PAVEMENT DESIGN Pavement subgrade areas should be stripped and examined by one of our staff to evaluate if there are areas where additional excavation is 1 appropriate. If the subgrade is stable, we recommend that utilities and utility ducts be installed in advance of placing any subbase fill. 1 Utility trenches should be backfilled to pavement subgrade level with structural fill compacted as previously recommended. 1 If the native subgrade soils can be rolled to a firm and nonyielding condition during dry weather, a subbase layer is not necessary. However, it the pavement areas are prepared during wet weather, a subbase section consisting of 12 inches or more of sand and gravel with less than 5 percent passing the No. 200 sieve, based on that fraction passing the 1 3/4—inch sieve, may be necessary to prepare a stable subgrade for the pavement section. The base course and asphalt concrete (AC) section should consist of 6 inches of crushed rock and 3 inches of AC in roadway and truck traffic areas. Parking areas should have 4 inches of crushed rock and 2 inches of AC. USE OF THIS REPORT We have prepared this report for use by Taco Time and The Casey Group Architects in design and construction of this project. The data and report should be utilized for bidding or estimating purposes, but our 1report, conclusions and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of the subsurface conditions. If there are changes in the loads, grades, location, configuration, 1 type, or schedule of construction for the project, the conclusions and recommendations presented may not be applicable. If design changes are made, we should be retained to review our conclusions and recommendations and to provide a written modification or verification. l 7 1 1,1 • GeoEngineers The conclusions and recommendations in this report should be applied in their entirety. When the design has been finalized, we recommend that Ci the final design and specifications be reviewed by our firm to see that our recommendations have been interpreted and implemented as intended. 1 The scope of our services does not include services related to construction safety precautions and our recommendations are not intended 111 to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. The subsurface conditions are expected to vary across the site. A contingency for unanticipated conditions should be included in the budget and schedule. Sufficient monitoring, testing and consultation by our firm should be provided during construction to confirm that the conditions encountered are consistent with those indicated by the explorations, to provide recommendations for design changes should the conditions revealed 1 during the work differ from those anticipated, and to evaluate whether or not earthwork and foundation installation activities comply with contract 1 plans and specifications. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services 1 have been executed in accordance with generally accepted practices in this area at the time the report was prepared. No other conditions, express or implied, should be understood. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. Should you have any questions concerning this report or if we can provide 1 additional services, please call. f ►.T Respectfully submitted,tted,l r � HENOl- ° R GeoEngineers, Inc.eQ' wASHisa ,a • ir"- Da d W. Ashcom, P.E. 0 ,p 12979 9 4, Pro' ct Engineer ePS/0NAL ENS' llV Gary'W. Henderson, P.E. J DWA:GWH:cs Principal 8 l I' I Asommist,. I • I '..\"..,ri..?'`... ' 9 'igi- **, •--. . . .(_------• ".:, 4::-!- • ii.' .,,,.li j i 1 V7,-•••'' _ --.'''''..I 1 . -_-II 1 I1 . •aV•l••'I••'''II'.-.'/ri:::::t:r/::':in::..":!-.::;:::!7'.,r...,i:':.?a:.,7:::•:7::::.::ii!ii,::.i.;i.::':•*' 113i:.ii11_-,_ —__ --‘•—'.‘•".41i1 •.. .,•,,,.,-''ir4i•:. ••-•"?•••-' _ si.,'..:-_,.A.'i ri'.••.•_;3,.:.1' -i.-i- t I ).=.‘\-- 1,1 'Aci. .• %, I' ,- . . 'VeiI _LL_— - ___ . , jrj ,,. i j r_..-.:*..r......•.•. ..•' .' .' • .. . • • . • --•..4 • II, ..:7.7:::: IN I p 1:;:s.::.:i:i:i*k....-.,..--.7; ') *.Ni994AT -11.. ..._,n ". ) • :• ll:•---i' I II \ %• ', :, • .-..re:...;" II i'..:.:::.::!;. 1;::',..:2:..3 As.f. *. : ...V..:. •0 ' --""•• •. cijI.M.a_tf...--, 9 ) 1 i I .3 • • . .,.. ‘,_,. ..._.: io ii•--; . -- , . -2 %,iii. Ar ••,• •••,:.---,,.-1, .—, 'c%1 1 i IL, L., • ••••;.:,:/' is •---7\ \' * •••• %. ''" •.• 11 I: V • • -- \w' i ilia . :I. ! 1 i..t.. I i •••••••.tkilk.94 I t:....ii.1 klinin I .! f. .i ,,„............ I 1 ' ill 1 4k4iti'. ;. ,...... .•-• t ....11 •7--. ;, • .1P-!'.. :i •• . . . i 111111111ITI II\\' ' P01 :9te .4. (.-• ',,. v,..): 1 • ., . . 1 .. . . . . . ._ , • .• :::::::,......1 .I ..,. • , ,i::.:::; ..,, , ........ ._ .. _. . ,. , . .7.._......,. ... •___ ,. .. • J .. .,)-•..' . te,..- , k i ,1( #1 If I s 1 . • . r-•-a.k..• c •' 7.•'' • . .E M — ' 1.r,'.. .' . . . .7, , I I :BM.. ..; •,:„..-- . •r---) :....----,-„------. ,---. --...,- -. 1.-',"cl,' :it. , -...• plit,Ipii ,- •.:, • .--,:---_--..r.. '!4 I , .2.4---lw/. ,' li , 1 • .•- •11 - . , I is • ' ' ''.'"--'306• _.„,,,,•-r. a i MI ',. •'• ''. AW ...- .... \-----,1,---•••- ".. I:GreenwiFia-Ctrr. ' •0 - I . - - -..., - r. . • i•.• • i'' • • -- . • . • I ;I. . ,,1111 r S' .— . .-,,---., - • , . 1, ...•••iiY;106 7-`.I' --• '.. ••• li 4i if, ‘, ;,- -- • •:_4 -' ' _..! i • i .7." • • ,,'--/ / „,./.1 ' it) •° f:,' , _ •. ..:. - .-: • 191 -; C ..-- - - ••• --1-7- I: 1 • ::':: :;•!".::7;''.' aaseli!,-.7. ,. %I' i• ., I •:",;••:- ..i-: ,.,•:- ... • Park , • '\c, .'..,: 71-• ) ...,_._..- .: = --:..... • 1 1 ,;:. ...... ',,,... ‘.4t., • • s so_ ,4• s.,-,-,.' 1- . -5... • .•‘••• /a.,. '\ '. sr , . _ --, • •• (----7\ 7. :I: • ••• •;17...., _.... N — „ .4 ,._.1—•..,:k;'.- 7. 7-.n,•••2 2 3., ,,•••2 __ .a,r,. :: .,•,!(D '4:":. ,,_7' -''il 7 - "- -•",,--.,,,e,,, r. I re- ,,— ,‘.,L.. •,-.-,_:::' ' •,.. '.. ••• Ifri 1.•.!•!-::\-17,:i±.: ::**.::-I-...•'.--*;.:1% 7,..: .'''' :«•i ,„..--"-__ ---S. \-3....`t- ,--'2--- .--.---,'22,., _',- - --._,:. I'. ' •-•. \- _._..7.:.?4.2.72. "• `•-;.:•;:- ."•' 0.•:-...........................: • ; :: I °al, 1 r.--....i V e 4,TITAVOI"-FF ‘N,:- - ^,.., ......,,-,.-,-,n. .. ';. '7---- ' i L-1"-'"1"- c2-7,1 -r.---•--rw c-.4`..-.-,-3:7- -;•'----T.YZ,';••N;. ', l'•=::::::". '..-.-='''". .;,) ".. : I ' ',j'''..I,,,-'1,-g-'4':411'.- I r__11711::-...:A‘41//:""P•iNik-s>....•;,.i4::-N4)'-------.„./'''':.\'''''4' ti-1:--'7;N.1-.l.'''''' .:•••:;-':';'--------7::::—/° '-'—i—.-:._7';.:------;:' .-.!;:' -'-',..:7-.---sl's \-------'* -\-.-------- -;----;'----- "7"-:•.c. :::... ' . : ,F.,•d Id 1 \I ..;. ,,,i-:,*--;,..!•_.:**-', „,* ',Via"'i.,;. ••,.,-,:2.`el.,`,-;_,-- . - .... .:-.-.7.-.:1-Jr.....-=-•-- ( - 0 I I t (;), ‘--_,..%"--<-_.,-- -------- -- .._,-.—•• ,-,-,.:1,1".".• --..--. -,...-:•---,, ; ..-,.."h ., I ir 1Z:r.,:..,...,.,,`:. _-.':'.." '.. _ :c.,. -.1/1::,*ii ‘--1- .., ,- .:TT.:-.-"'"-----*4Z.:\''' •''' ,..,. ,, f•-• i f, ,'L'j...-'-' ,"-- i,','.. :f_..--•;''• . :L.;.'•••• — I t• ''•17-.7,-.•-•••' ‘ '/. -7 ,.' ••‘''- --..!7-'-i.;• . '% '7==••'''' ;';';'t..7.;.'-'.. •.;.' )° ••'-'‘;'.'''.--7-•% i'fri.'7' •••';:77•.,--7-..•''' --r•-- ) ir ;. _•1'-''!•;-',7,-.17. ''''';',...._\Zt,.•:':-..7 7 ..... . '..- , .2:.. 7: •%.•V ••I'Vl.:••.•;'•'s'',',..••••••,„•••••I!••1.-:-.'---; •-.....--;"•;...14:7......•-•71;-;•'17.-- . ,_ 4 •-9...... /,,... „ i il, -----,-----;-----,-::: :—. •.----- ---..3,-_,.----.':-,z,,,, ;-,,,,--,.-,::,-,-,, ...----, >h*, >1.., i,,,;.4 Al . 1i I 1 p\,. ... =-,,,,=:*-r--=--..._::=------.''-*--' '-,••' --...s, ; -* -7, . ---J_.•.:: \. .- . AN. :',••-•-•.-- • ......V,.',; ( ...--••• . ?:,...-a-..'1:1:::, 1 . 1.0 1:k. i;_: .r .\. ...\_:,., .,. ,---•_, -- ••.A.,.. 1..., - -,:,—)) „__Bmr3.??....... . • ,. \\•rs((y, c.---- •‹Z'kv -----!----........ . .-..---e'7677,M 7 .....--::,-.. :"...:• \• ';',, 1.:-• 1,1 • ..,i it. . ., ,. ,-.,.., ,..., , . „..\, L.... _. .., ,... ..-..--: ,,.....:,y, „,,-0-.:, ----„,,,---.1------ --, ,:.,„----. l_ ..._- __,,... .,., 1 •...111 I *,..-..,...,.....-:,...:4____ \,,. :.. . .\. ,,,.....___..-, 0,i ',.....• .,......,...,..N. .s., ."-----.----,.- ...„.„-:,._.-----., r • x..,..,.----1. - -...,1, c,..., ••--- --T-t , • 7 ::•-, 1 5 -•-•.r: \ -----•''''-• -- (1 \\\:v '-i--•-- -:-_: , '•••••• ' .. 1•i.• •.--.. , .. • - • •-7: ' ' ,,,•'......'-''.,_•-•„........s.:...,___•,.•_••• s•:-._...„-....,,),,,•-..,..,-,,, I,.1„7----.".•.t.... .S.,,,--.,,,,•:..4,....,/,, ••• '.1 / / ', !'•::: -...1.2. '' ! .: I 13) I :_.-- \ •-61 '.1...`,-:-;;,-...---,‹'';,*-••••- ----j1-13.1,..-%;-:.-.,!.ii,-- ),_;,:.,i,',1, 'i I•..);(•::47••••;-;:''`-c,i;_.••::...;•„.---V•j:,/ . -..........5 ---N__ ., ., , .. . ., ..... ., c. ,•. • ;A ;1. I ) • , i 1 ...- ••••:-.t.,-=,..i,,i4,-•,,., ,:i ri i ii17.:(•:....4:. : .•••i\-;',--, '-* -,,, \\,.' ;( _,.%\" . ,. ! -,\k•:• '•••• 1 • , ••••••• ,...,"\ ,,.1.r.."• '0,71: li•.•%.;t:„• ;•P•':!!"/.:::7.q/ • c 4.7 coo •;.;I. : •',,.,.., \ \\ u a- • . "•,,..- 1".••I.\,.• .. ••••••_., - •---:--------,_:,. '--•', *•\1.: ••1 : •q* 1 ! : , -, • ::::: ---••: 1 • • ‘,.• •----..-----.---.- --, -•.,__.----__,,,.. =et. 1(r) .... 1.-, rf,- -, ,. II\ \ , \ •„____ ,,:.., /.• ,, ; -„,-:: ................„-- ,, ,. ...., ..,. ._. • .,.. 7 •... --- )ek .,,,,s-iyi .-',.... -\:\.\\_.,—,77,-;------..---ri-----,; ,. .. 1,,k,,,,,,,\-c.,,,,:-':_...--,__:,..:__.,..'.'1.,...,,,':,'.\„2,7:,_,:,:."'...,,....,Lo.',:-.•:(::'7—.,.....r.-7,:,--',.--!--N\'22-sk-N---ss-,,.--:-.-_,-: -,• ,., -..i. . 1 1/4„.. -,r, \• , . ...„....• >.„ . i I._ 1 ) 40s5 ' -., ..„ I .-,-C 7--i-Y*. V'•'•-?' -•-•1"-•1; :-------- .i.'-‘;' -'2.• ' '•\‘ i• ; •::::,1',,.,..,,....•,,,,.1, k . . . 7; 'VII 1 • 4i...` ,..fflC:,,;„,•:Z.s,j f•-• II ! _ . \ i \ \‘., • j1 , . ""r---• ,,A \•.')..,•,-\\........,-......:—.. •...! . (. 1'. 'stl.i,sts....'",.. , • i i i —L--.. , ••,„ '..,,,t,„, ,,,, ,,,, 0 . -• 1. i 1..tt. ., • ..." *"1 V. '\\ ':‘•''''''.:-.\:.••,• ,--. , ! A,: ? s\ '''' V . .? O . \1.. .•I ;.'•;:::11.-ISLIL- ef_..„..,L... .i‘Y--1 .. ,,.\c.1\- ''.,...,;,iN. ''\i• ..\\';'' ° \ H ..----'''.:• '-----7); -L--- -1 r•r-,"•: '•.. 4\'‘•lI• 4‘":: •••I'',<\ .1 , „• . .. '' f/ a \ • • .. ... . . N,N,, 1•__, \1••,.. ,--..7-,s ,_••:14-- ------ , %;-.\:, •:.••• , . . '1 1 .' * 1 " t's s'''';',... ' :•,. ''....." r ,' ,•7 r- ,, uo _-,..., ,,,..\\_,„, :, —7---••• .;,.. .."1.c„--. ••:...,,,., ‘,...-7 I\I,: ; 1,-•------- --s4--;.\-,2 : 4-;'.:.„1 ; ( I I .,2/„/j ‘,\ 1 __ . \i',c•\1.%.* Il .'1•1`•. --,. .:•1/412.i."P'•'to I 0 Ieo 4.000 2000 • 10 • I 1 <S) SCALE IN FEET • lz...1, N . . . , . . i REFERENCE: USGS 7. 5 ' TOPOGRAPHIC QUADRANGLE MAP "RENTON, WASH." 1 ,, • • VICINITY MAP Geo is;•-e%Engineers iiikli 09 FIGURE 1 . . . • . , • , . •- • ..._ .. ___ _.. ....... ,-, .„ ..,. -..- -- - :••• • ..... ___ __ .,-.......... ._.... .. . .. ...... . .... ,. '� .y �'T-=A'-� K�`. M .,. ,1 nY'^' :"dr' '.-:: ' -''4� .:i-�.�� �R -s, -s:C�r:"`:. t ir.t'. a-.. .,•n1. ice-- '..-5 -�•..- '..�`_ .R ..a_�a .- F "f� '. _ ..r- f i Property Line 5 S`rs -e ed QlOQo ` \__ N 1 0 30 60 1 1 SCALE IN FEET --\ • - A % •MW-26 tt. a p` EXPLANATION: MW-37 M W-8• G��t MW-5• MONITOR WELL LOCATION AND NUMBER li Approximate Location of to NVapor Recovery Trench \` Z to - MW-21 • A MW-5• w N h REFERENCE: DRAWING ENTITLED "TACO TIME OFFICE (MAPLE VALLEY HWY.)"', PROVIDED BY THE CASEY GROUP, UNDATED, �ep SITE PLAN Geo a-Engineers APPENDIX A 7 MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION DRILLING AND SOIL SAMPLING PROGRAM Subsurface conditions in the Maplewood area were explored by drilling n '� monitor well borings. Monitor wells in the vicinity of Taco Time's proposed office site are located as shown on Figure 2. Borings 5, 88, 21, and 26 were drilled between October 15 and October 19, 1986; boring 37 was drilled in November, 1988. The borings , were advanced to depths ranging between 24 and 26 feet using truck-mounted, hollow-stem auger drilling equipment operated by Soil Sampling Service, Inc. and R & R Drilling (Boring 37 only) . A geological engineer from our staff examined and classified the soils encountered, and prepared a detailed log of each boring. Soils encountered were classified visually in general accordance with the system described in Figure A-1. An explanation of the boring log symbols is . 1 presented in Figure A-2. Boring logs are presented in Figures 'A-3 through A-7. Relatively undisturbed and disturbed samples were obtained from each boring using a Dames & Moore split barrel sampler (2.4-inch-ID) . The sampler was driven 18 inches by a 140- or 300-pound weight falling a vertical distance of approximately 30 inches. The number of blows needed to advance the sampler the final 12 inches or other specified distances is indicated to the left of the corresponding sample notations on the boring logs. Samples obtained from the borings were carefully reexamined in our soils laboratory for soil classification purposes. I A - 1 ' SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM MAJORGROUP GROUP NAME DIVISIONS SYMBOL GRAVEL CLEAN GRAVEL GW WELL-GRADED GRAVEL,FINE TO COARSE COARSE GRAVEL GRAINED GP POORLY-GRADED GRAVEL ISOILS MORE THAN 50% GRAVEL GM SILTY GRAVEL OF COARSE FRACTION WITH FINES RETAINED ON NO. 4 SIEVE GC CLAYEY GRAVEL I MORE THAN 50% RETAINED ON SAND CLEAN SAND SW WELL-GRADED SAND, FINE TO NO. 200 SIEVE COARSE SAND SP POORLY-GRADED SAND MORE THAN 50% SAND SM SILTY SAND OF COARSE FRACTION PASSES WITH FINES NO. 4 SIEVE SC CLAYEY SAND SILT AND CLAY ML SILT FINE INORGANIC GRAINED CL CLAY 0 SOILS LIQUID LIMIT LESS THAN 60 ORGANIC OL ORGANIC SILT, ORGANIC CLAY SILT AND CLAY MH SILT OF HIGH PLASTICITY. ELASTIC SILT MORE THAN 50% INORGANIC PASSES NO. 200 SIEVE CH CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAY LIQUID LIMIT I 50 OR MORE ORGANIC OH ORGANIC CLAY, ORGANIC SILT HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PEAT NOTES: SOIL MOISTURE MODIFIERS: I 1. Field classification is based on Dry - Absence of moisture, dusty, dry visual examination of soil in general to the touch 1 accordance with ASTM D2488-83. Moist - Damp, but no visible water ■ 2. Soil classification using laboratory tests Is based on ASTM D2487-83. Wet - Visible free water or saturated, in usually soil Is obtained from 3. Descriptions of soil density or below water table p consistency are based on interpretation of blowcount data, visual appearance of soils, and/or ,4) test data. 1 co co 1' 11,0, I H tall IIC SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM Geo�e Enoineers ��/ b FIGURE A-1 r ! i • LABORATORY TESTS: SOIL GRAPH: _ AL Atterberg limits CP Compaction SM Soil Group Symbpl CS Consolidation (See Note 1) DS Direct shear GS Grain-size analysis Distinct contact between HA Hydrometer analysis Soil Strata K Permeability' Gradual Change between li M Moisture content Soil Strata MD Moisture and density SP Swelling pressure - Water Level TX Triaxial compression UC Unconfined compression /A Bottom of Boring CA Chemical Analysis 1 BLOW-COUNT/SAMPLE DATA:' • 1 Blows required to drive Dames Moore sampler 12 inches or < 22®. Location of relatively other indicated distances using undisturbed sample 1 140 or 300 pound hammer falling 30 inches. 12® Location of disturbed sample "P" indicates sampler pushed with P 0 Location of sampling attempt 1 I weight of hammer or hydraulics with no recovery of drill rig. 10 0 Location of sample attempt using Standard Penetration Test 1 ,a procedures 4o 0 Location of relatively undisturbed L sample using 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. 1 �;. NOTES: w 11. Soil classification system is summarized in Figure A-1. I to 2. The reader must refer to the discussion in the report text o as well as the exploration logs for a proper understanding of subsurface conditions. 1 � 1Vi V l00 c II l � cl �� KEY TO BORING LOG SYMBOLS Geo�.eEngineers • 1 FIGURE A-2 • MONITOR WELL NO. 5 W WELL SCHEMATIC i +r a) 1 Casing Elevation: 61.98 o( E Group DESCRIPTION Casing Stickup: -0.17 mU vi Symbol Surface Elevation:62.15 feet _ 0 -STEEL SURFACE SOD LAYER 11 - MONUMENT ML BROWN SANDY SILT WITH OCCASIONAL GRAVEL (LOOSE, I MOIST) - ,.1 - °-501 L CUTTINGS - -.. - '-2-INCH 6 ■ - UNSLOTTED - SCHEDULE 40 5-- _ PVC PIPE — BENTONITE • SEAL - pI - COARSE SAND - B = BACKFILL - = 39 ■ SM BROWN SILTY FINE TO COARSE SAND WITH GRAVEL 10— — - S K.;} 2-INCH - - = it SCHEDULE 40 .: PVC PIPE, — .: 0.020-INCH - - = SLOT WIDTH 59 ■ 1 15— = PRODUCT — TINTEI:FACE ON GW- BROWN FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL WITH SILT, SAND AND ` 10/19/8G GM COBBLES (MEDIUM DENSE, WET) - — ::•.WATER '(HYDROCARBON ODOR IN SAMPLE) - f' INTERFACE ON w = 10/19/86 36 ■ LL _ OJ F" a w `" - - = . 22.4 FEET - o "::;•:•:; BASE OF WELD I _ ,0 ■ (sLIGI1r HYDROCARBON ODOR I N SAMPLE) - 25— BORING COMPLETED AT 24. 5 FEET ON 10/1G/86 — 1 CJ ..' SAMPLER DRIVEN WITH A 300-POUND HAMMER `;r co 11 J _ 30— — n_ z - - o i , n_ cY - - III I u_ - -7 3 5 40 — Note: See FigureA-2 for Explanation of Symbols I �� GeoEnglneers LOG OF MONITOR WELL �� Incorporated FIGURE A-3 1 - , • MONITOR WELL NO. 8 co WELL SCHEMATIC I +• co Casing Elevation: 61.59 c o m Group DESCRIPTION L Casing Stickup: -0.33 mU co Symbol Surface Elevation: 61.92 feet 0 1 STEEL SURFACE SOD LAYER - MONUME_NT SM BROWN SILTY FINE SAND (LOOSE, MOIST) - ML SANDY SILT WITH ORGANIC MATTER (MEDIUM STIFF, -0-SOIL CUTTINGS MOIST) I - ` — —2-INCH 6 MI - UNS LOTTED 5_ _ SCHEDULE 40 — - _ PVC PIPE - BENTONITE -r i; SEAL - •S -COARSE SAND _ BACKFILL 57 • 11 _ GM BROWN AND GRAY SILTY FIE- TO COARSE GRAVEL WITH — 10— % �,'.::2-INCH SAND AND COBBLES (DENSE, MOIST) _ SCHEDULE 40 = ?:: PVC PIPE, - - _ ::. 0.020-INCH = _ SLOT WIDTH f 87 • - 3?.'='' FOR - 0,'WATER LEVEL - ., ......A ON 10/19/86 F- _ / GW BROWN FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL WITH SILT, SAND AND w — 53 GM COBBLES (DENSE, WET) - z _ (SLIGHT HYDROCARBON ODOR IN SAMPLE) — • = 20— I- o• p - • — • SW_ BROWN FINE TO COARSE SAND WITH SILT AND GRAVEL - — SM (DENSE, WET) _ _ `•`:'23.0 FEET 50 _ Bi\SE OF WELL - N 25— BORING COMPLETED AT 24.5 FEET ON 10/17/86 — 1 a -- SAMPLER DRIVEN WITH A 300-POUND HAMMER = cv IJ — nJ n. 3 0— o - - F -) - _. �L - _ _ _ 1 -) 35— . • — _, 40— — Note: See Figure A-2 for Explanation of Symbols ...• N • LOG OF MONITOR WELL GeoEnglneers , �IS ► Incorporated FIGURE A-4 F 'J MONITOR WELL NO. 21 W WELL SCHEMATIC 1 . 0 Casing Elevation:62.79 00 Group DESCRIPTION as Casing Stickup: -0.49 mo co Symbol Surface Elevation:63.28 feet _ 0 --/ STEEL SURFACE MONUMENT SUD LAYER 1 i - 11 SM DARK BROWN SILTY FINE SAND WITH ROOTS AND - I SOIL CUTTINGS OCCASIONAL GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE, WET) ,BENTONITE - _ ' SEAL .r COARSE SAND 1 - BACKEILL ,.. _ :: SP- LIGHT BROWN FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH SILT (LOOSE I.`.'. 2-INCH SM TO MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST) 1 1 - UNSLOTTED - •'• •• SCHEDULE 40 PVC PIPE - 10— 7 ■ - : = 2-INCH 1 I _ SCHEDULE 40 - = 2:•.PVC PIPE, 1 ` t:0.020-INCH ` I ' 15— :;SLOT WIDTH , = 52 ■ SP BROWN FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH COARSE SAND AND — 6" GRAVEL (DENSE, MOIST) I ,= o' ATER LEVEL - w - w SW BROWN FINE TO COARSE SAND WITH.GRAVEL (MEDIUM LL _ DENSE, WET) z = - = 20— ;:_ 47 ■ (PRODUCT ODOR IN SAMPLE) — I ' ~ — i a w — oI • — 23.5 FEET - I - BASE or WELL 1 25— • 94 ■ — IBORING COMPLETED TO 26. 0 FEET ON 10/17/86 SAMPLER DRIVEN WITH A 140-POUND HAMMER 30— — y - I 1 I 35— — I - I 40— — r , Note: See Figure A-2for Explanation of Symbols - Its' LOG OF MONITOR .WELL GeoEnglneers �� Incorporated FIGURE A-5 MONITOR WELL NO. 26 WELL SCHEMATIC °� Casing Elevation:63.33 0 e E Group DESCRIPTION • Casing Stickup: -0.38 coo co Symbol Surface Elevation: 63.71 feet 0 f -STEEL SURFACE - SOD LAYER - MONUMENT SM BROWN SILTY FINE SAND AND SANDY SILT (MEDIUM ` • -LSOIL CUTTINGS ML DENSE AND STIFF, MOIST) -2-INCH - ..___ UNSLOTTED g,\SCHEDULE 40 - - �,%?;=r;.. PVC PIPE 27 • 5— ;:;• __ BENTONITE = SEAL 1 - := '4-COARSE SAND - BACK Fr-I Ll_ =rir - Srr- BROWN FINE SAND WITH SILT (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST) SM _ 67 ■ 10— = r- SW. DARK BROWN FINE TO COARSE SAND WITH GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST) GW BROWN FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL WITH SAND AND 100 ® COBBLES (DENSE, MOIST) 15— 6" • — '4' WATER LEVEL ON 10/19/86 - - �':. 2-INCH • w = ..:SCHEDULE 40 BECOMES WET AT 17.5 FEET w ;•I PVC PIPE, I- - —i:' t0.020-INCH _ z = :!:.• SLOT WIDTfi 75 (SLIGHT PRODUCT ODOR IN SAMPLE) 20— — — I... _ — a = - w - = o - — - — '. 24.0 FEET 25— ''` BASE OF WELL 63 • (PRODUCT ODOR IN SAMPLE) -BORING COMPLETED AT 25. 5 FEET ON 10/17/86 _ • • SAMPLER DRIVEN WITH A 140-POUND HAMMER - 30— — 35— — 40— — Note: See Figure A-2 for Explanation of Symbols ' .. iw LOG OF MONITOR WELL i. ��•4 GeoEnglneers 1� Incorporated FIGURE A-6 MONITOR WELL NO. MW- ,r N WELL SCHEMATIC «, a . . Casing Elevation: o o' E Group DESCRIPTION Casing Stickup: mu co Symbol Surface Elevation: 0 - /�J STEEL SURFACE 50D = MONUMENT SM BROWN SILTY FINE SAND WITH OCCASIONAL GRAVEL If. AND ORGANIC MATTER (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST) - E3ENTON I TE SEAL : 4': 2-INCH, SCHEDULE 10 III - '',_. : 40 PVC WELL 'ji.::�'i CASING SOLID 5- - - `ML LIGHT BROWN SILT (STIFF, MOIST) • - ..:.:; _ 15 ■ - - ::: - ::'''�`:'. SI' REDDISH-BROWN FINE TO MEDIUM SAND (VERY DENSE, WET) ::: -.2-INCH, SCHEDULE - 40 PVC WELL 50 ■ /GP BROWN COARSE GRAVEL WITH COBBLES AND A TRACE _ -:: SCREEN 0.020- OF SAND (VERY DENSE, WET) - INCH SLOT WIDTH ■ 15- •;(: ':� 0. ■ �. 2::=,, MED I 11M SAND -----a- = I3ACKFILL SP BROWN FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH A TRACE OF w = CA ■ SILT (DENSE, WET) - Z = CA ■ PETROLEUM ODOR DETECTED FROM 18 TO 21 FEET _ F 20 CA ■ GRAY COARSE GRAVEL WITH A TRACE OF SAND - a 61 ■ GP (VERY DENSE, WET) 0 _ BASE OF WELL AT GRADES TO GRAY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH A - 25- :..._.._ 24 FEET 50 ■ TRACE OF SILT (VERY DENSE, WET) BORING COMPLETED AT 25.5 FEET ON 10/6/88 - - I 30- - - • 35— — • 40— — , . _ . ' Note: See Figure for Explanation of Symbols . LOG OF MONITOR WELL Geo�iz Engineer s FIGURE A-7 • I i ' of R� t;,; L''f-' 41° 4) c'z NICITIF ,i .:,..i. s :',,:.; - .'ii 0 _ E ii 0 ,Q. ,., 9„. SEPZ,.0,,, ,, OF PENDING - ,, . SITE PLAN ,:: •,, , . D E S C R I P T 1 O N • Taco Time Office Building SA; ECF-125-88 Application for siteplan ap proval to allow the construction of an office Building for the corporate headquarters of the Taco Time restaurant chain. Site plan includes an office building of '•j 7,792 square feet together with a small storage building consisting of 1,920 square feet for some of the products needed by the company's restaurants. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: ` Maple Valley Highway and Monroe Avenue SE• • i PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : Environmental Review Site Plan• Review !`'' Building Permit 4'. w.�: :v4, PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT .ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS . AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. • • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 r THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED : .'` WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATION I , k Pj\ T.. L. I VjO , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT �� 66 (3) COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN flM1T) �,3 ) CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON JAI..JU ! �� 19, 7 , ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a 1 Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington • � W' 1� residing in� /��blV , on the 97a SIGNED : t ' day o ifc6) K _ n,- R, e► O c3TicE 0 OWNED Z . 9Q �• 0,9gTep OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPLICATION D E S C R 1 P T I O N • Taco Time Office Building SA; ECF-125-88 Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of an office Building for the corporate headquarters of the Taco Time restaurant chain. Site plan includes an office building of 7,792 square feet together with a small storage building consisting of 1, 920 square feet for some of the products needed by the company's restaurants. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: Maple Valley Highway and Monroe Avenue SE PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : Environmental Review Site Plan Review Building Permit PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN __-PROVAL I RENTON, WASHINGTON , A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Planning Division of the Community Development Department. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DESCRIPTION: Taco Time Office Building I SA; ECF-125-88 Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of an office Building for the corporate headquarters of the Taco Time restaurant chain. Site plan includes an office building of 7,792 square feet together with a small storage building consisting of 1,920 square feet for some of the products needed by the company's restaurants. r GENERAL LOCATION: Maple Valley Highway and Monroe Avenue SE PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Review Building Permit The application can be reviewed at the Planning Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hal l.1. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Planning Division at 235-2550. G- 1 .I o I I ' 52 9 . I 1 I 51 s ;,I I • 5°_i/ I I y .e • , e I I .e II , .IIl rl .3 . I I z ll J 1 ./VII(( 1I II• I I ] I ) f 9 9 Subjecfi • I I I'1 -\S S t1 e 1 1 1 1 I I 7/ 7fgL0i11II[1)�1...1.111 1.II0 ars �,7 I [ ! / •, s "J J wit! „, ,i I . - e ,, // .0.6_,!.,.. / , .,„:7 a /' / , C..., ‘,, -,,,',,.,,,,6':: 4r,,,._ 0.?_.,,....• ,,,, ,,,, , , , . \ , - -A/\ 111*; -N. '. " • to'e 3 es 1 „, / "IL k'i,ILi . 1-.4 .:;::.?::.•. 'a,'' ‘P''.?\,14,-k4it . y7--#7_ „4/ , , 9 . /4- F --II '' A''''''N . ',77. 1, / ' .;'t , '/.,t' b / / //' / IC /s /• /� - ; ie a" 'ILPN7\' � ! ° :'; ) /a _ / ,,, 1/2/1 ,..- ...' -1 ' 1 RIU EIZ .- 1- A _ / ,,''; r -\ •Nie7 _ S.. • /;'/ E o t �dt FPuo- 024_ 8 '' / " I G 1 r • STATISTICS .' / II' VE f T. P1aR PROMS. PROJECT IT TIE N. CORPORATE rEnDPWiEUS \\ / Z NASIIIIETOM BUILDING �f x .ccnE"r Im THIS THE T HILL 0.5E IME TORAGE PORTION�1•En•P�•TE'-..o.'..cE.E,. S O �. \ —1 • u S.TO STORE OFFICES.OFLTIESARMLETS MOORED INTTIEE LS RETAIIL.LES OF ' i / , _ 1 RESTAURANTS. MO COTS,.STORAGE IS PLAANED. A SPADE ZEE CONSTIECTIOND s ' START SCHEMED FOR THIS < -EEO,/Ncau\_ ESTIMATED BE•FOE.. ceP¢v.EaT. THE cv.srincrlo.swnrlan Is m \ `• 15�U41DbfXt'WF\t.4 I 1 T r E ICE• y 1. m PT \ "••- v'NYiM FOLIO hOdQ IE1Y.E - ▪rE.url. 1 .T I ' •.S v uq,.f.5 4...a .,ES.Id ,. . IC WILDING AMMO j a I • - STORAGE $ LL ,.. SSE �PIEEF. .E•I l ‘5.`E` I _ t ./� ITERVI-S COVER.. z.sE a 51,EI wI •it 1' ! I � +, u'oa.E.cIP1STORAGE BUILDING , � rice oTor.` as.,sP „ IPMEI.LOT LwmSC.V 1 LwIEEc. •"E s.E...o51 s isl‘t .•� / \\ ,y \ 1 n-Ee:::: l OFFICE-NET M ET•I.TOILLL['.CG.RIW..5.OS3 E.P.noo n.l_ I, -1 _l8. j i1rtiI- _.—\\'.1ETO.,IE WILBUR. ,..=a S.F.,, _ ., 1 �u. I ' ( I .�TOTAL VALLS IEOUIaE, / . ..I IiI OF sc 35 ; \C ` �i,' �D • I --— 5 STALLS S• H i� / d O / 1( rw�4 i- _ \moo / i/ t r. a e• _ _ .1 / ../ i „.-1.0 1 tiTil: �� � .d�3 �., ILI.:(/���) ,""�'"'c \U —__ "') I I I. 2.,.. VICINITY MAP SO.. iP-Ioo �Y4 Eck ..�\ ,/ �..D<rsfE QQ Ya �� �\_ o / = I C L.ICbD FEu^� �` 'i t-roc_6.rr- ��\ _,'i.mn.Rr.a\ I i I I m [ �'� i t�, SITE PLAN \ s• r-�.\ 5e tee. \�\ \T/-__/ \�i 8 ?E / POLE LIGHT -u• '"" . ! E. r rww vn1.La+'.IwN+.r ea E:+ �IgAC \6, \\ I O. E I / / + CFrbj `� \ �\ i 1 / E cyN \\ \� �� 1 \ ridlik_.--,411.•?'-",Irrf, " i,' ,'.—,. , ,.. ..„-ED , _.,,.,.., ._, .._,, • ....,. .I1 i- RENTOM� i Vi'- _11J____1t '4' \• \ _ _ _ • _ • • �/, '. i - _ •ir " • • f•.fi I 16 di. SOLID v e \ C.,— 1 '\ �'. . •- - may,,,•. •_ 'i�r±..• �i1• —'- i.IF_. -; i, FENCE ELEVATION -� Vll�a Caaasi aFOUZ A\F©ln�u1a©i a Architecture and Planning °p`l�� CITY OF 'RENTON to& DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION January 19, 1989 Paul Casey _ • 10116 36th Ave. Ct. S.W. #203 Tacoma, Washington 98499 Re: Taco Time Office Building Maple Valley Highway and Monroe Ave. S.E. Application # SA; ECF-125-88 • Dear Mr. Casey: The Community Development Department has formally accepted the above referenced application. It has been routed for departmental review and is tentatively scheduled for the Technical Advisory Committee on February. 15, 1989 for consideration. If you have any questions regarding the scheduling of this project, please contact our office at 235-2550. I , Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/MBS:mjp cc: John Dobson 6611 114 Pl. S.E. Renton, WA 98056 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 •=i A RE; IN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT I ARTMENT CI/19 �c ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHE �'�9�//o4, C f SRN F . 4, REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: peh c.c, t cat 1 DATE CIRCULATED: January 19, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: February 9% r ,, p9rr ECF-125-88 -. i I APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-125-88 1 PROPONENT: ACCORD, INC. PROJECT TITLE: Taco Time Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct an office building and a storage building in a B-1 zone. - _ LOCATION: Maple Valley Highway and Monroe Ave. S.E. SITE AREA 43, 196 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : Office: 7,792 sq. ft. Storage: 1,920 sq.ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° 0 o ° ° 2 . Air ° . . . . . 3 . Water 0 . . o 0 —0 4 . Plants ° . . . . . 5. Animals ° 0 . . . . 6. Energy & Natural Resources 0 ° . 0 . 7 . Environmental Health • ° . 0 0 8 . Land & Shoreline Use 0 ° o 0 0 9 . Housing ° . . . . 0 10. Aesthetics ° ° . O 0 0 11. Light & Glare ° ° . 0 . . i 12 . Recreation ° . . . . 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° . . . 14 . Transportation ° . . . . 15. Public Services 0 ° . 16. Utilities ° ° . COMMENTS• `G�%� _/, I 'I We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 ti - RENTL,.. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE1- ,I'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-125-88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-125-88 PROPONENT: ACCORD, INC. PROJECT TITLE: Taco Time Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to build an office building and a storage building in a B-1 zone. LOCATION: Maple Valley Highway and Monroe Ave. S.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: Feb. 15, 1989 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU !�. POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON FEBRUARY 9, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE �`��, SIGNAT RE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 RE,., JN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT L .ARTMENT I' (, `onFireDrpt, i'� IF ON CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET U J r;ention Bere2'J �� I. REV 1; n ,�7i,.1 iri tai :pre, prPa0tX16rX DATE CIRCULATED: January 19, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: February 9, 1989 ECF-125- 8 PLANNING DIVISION f JANI 3J. i �i CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-125-88 11 JAN 2 0 1989 0 PROPONENT: ACCORD, INC. o PROJECT TITLE: Taco Time Office Buildings VE i; BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct an office building and a storage building in a B-1 zone. LOCATION: Maple Valley Highway and Monroe Ave. S.E. ,i SITE AREA 43, 196 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : Office: 7,792 sq. ft. Storage: 1,920 sq.ft. I I IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth . • . • . . 2 . Air 0 0 . , . 0 3 . Water . 0 0 . 0 . 4 . Plants . • . . 5. Animals . 0 0 . 0 . 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° ° . • . . 7 . Environmental Health ° ° 0 i ° . 0 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° . 0 . . 19 . Housing . • 0 . . . 10. Aesthetics ° ° 0 0 . . 11. Light & Glare ° ° • . • . 12 . Recreation ° ° • 0 • . aI 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° . . . 1 14 . Transportation ° 0 • O / . ° 15. Public Services 0 ✓ • • • . . 16. Utilities 0 . • it COMMENTS: II II We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. / . /9,/9fr9 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative4-4742. . Rev. 6/88 II • RENTVN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE] Lt TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET .. ECF-125-88 Jivt6IOCITY OFRENTON1 APPLICATION NO S . : ( ) SA-125-88 D JAN 2 0-1989 PROPONENT: ACCORD, INC. E C E a LS PROJECT TITLE: Taco Time Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to build an office building and a storage building in a B-1 zone. LOCATION: Maple Valley Highway and Monroe Ave. S.E. TO: • PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: Feb.15, 1989 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION _2L FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON FEBRUARY 9, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ire_ pre,x.aexAn APPROVED ',APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- nances. A second means of approved access is required. Fire Department access roads/lanes shall be paved minimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes _Department — Preliminary fire flow calculations show a fire flow of 3, ear, is required. 3 hydrants with a minimum flow of !, ae' gpm each is required. Primary hydrant is required to be within iSo feet of the structure. Secondary hydrants are required to be within 3 as feet of the structure. An approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes No f All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes ✓No..._ All fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior' to construction. Yes T o.._.__ DATE //›../& . /9//9d 9 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 i a REQU I RFI) FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS 1. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION NAME /F/Ce /;,9.2 0 cc/e ` 8A U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD ADDRESS /Vat', U,,1I. / /00%/./ Lcl.,)a y -r ��0A,A,404 FIRE MGMT AREA 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTIQ -_ CLASS (CIRCLE ONE): I - II IV III FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE ORDINARY WO'. " MIXED (NOTE: IF "MIXED", SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW) 3. DETERMINE AREA: Q GROUND FLOOR AREA: FT2 (A) �r�/Ce /g/cr' NUMBER OF STORIES: TOTAL BUILDING AREA: //, 79,2_. • 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE 01, USING AREA (A): ,IS"UU GPM (B) 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: — l 4g GPM CC) IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B): IF HIGH HAZARD, ADD UP TO 25% OF (B) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C): - CIF 8+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) / 2 75- GPM (D) 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: GPM (E) (IF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF (D): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF CD). 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT: USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAX. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 0 - 10 25% MAX. NORTH ?,_ 1 ADD AO % 11 - 30 20% MAX. EAST 5-Z_ ADD )5" % • 31 - 60 15% MAX. SOUTH • S'' ADD /o % 61 -100 10% MAX. WEST // ' ADD J % 101 -150 5% MAX. TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT 150 OR 4-HR WALL 0% MAX. (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) : cO % (TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES CD) ADOJ:TMEN T: +' 931 .S-' GPM (F) 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: • CIF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: GPM (G) `0 COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: (IF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) c} G /2 . .— (IF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12-;-000 GPM, INSERT 120►',�0 GPM) o� D (D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: ,6 ®®L' GPM (H) u,J SIGNED: /�'-.: �-,AK9.'�-��',,- ._. ? nl . i 1' _ _NTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1(yle-,Grii „ DATE CIRCULATED: January 19, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: Febru�ry,� .9, ,1989 P"Li�4�:lvki'd �J9"Ifi�djj ,i ECF-125-88 CITY OFRENTON APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-125-88 JAN 3 0 1989 --� 1I PROPONENT: ACCORD, INC. - 1 © I D V I J PROJECT TITLE: Taco Time Office Building i BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct an office building and a storage building in a B-1 zone. LOCATION: Maple Valley Highway and Monroe Ave. S.E. 1� SITE AREA 43, 196 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : Office: 7,792 sq. ft. Storage: 1,920 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE ;, MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY i 1. Earth ° ° 0 ° ° 2 . Air x ° ° it ° ° ° 3 . Water 0 )4 ° ° o ° ° 4 . Plants • 0 ° o ° 0 5. Animals ° 0 0 O 0 0 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° ° 0 o 0 0 7. Environmental Health 0 0 ° o ° ° 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° 0 0 9 . Housing ° ° ° o ° ° 10. Aesthetics 0 ° O 0 0 11. Light & Glare ° ° o ° 0 12 . Recreation 0 ° o ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° o ° 0 14 . Transportation X 0 ° O ° O 15. Public Services ° ° o ° ° 16. Utilities ° )( ° ° I COMMENTS: I I 1 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional infor ation is needed to properly assess this proposal. -ANC 4.1 , Z, 1259 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 i , a RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-125-88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-125-88 PROPONENT: ACCORD, INC. M JAN 3 0 1989 PROJECT TITLE: Taco Time Office BuildiR E C LS II U E BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to build an 1 office building and a storage building in a B-1 zone. LOCATION: Maple Valley Highway and Monroe Ave. S.E. TO: /\ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: Feb. 15, 1989 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: " COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON FEBRUARY 9, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: �tv+4L /LL ,— APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS X NOT APPROVED ?2ovit» I.1AL- Pis fie. T�i,cs 1:71e_ ,,,,,- L7-$ l ei v Aar . JO.A-111"-A-r7-4 DAT A41. 216 GCJl SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 ° i R .ON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT •ARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: January 19, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: February 9, 1989 ECF-125-88 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-125-88 PROPONENT: ACCORD, INC. PROJECT TITLE: Taco Time Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct an office building and a storage building in a B-1 zone. LOCATION: Maple Valley Highway and Monroe Ave. S.E. SITE AREA 43,196 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : Office: 7,792 sq. ft. Storage: 1,920 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° 4 ° ° 2 . Air ,l ° ° ° 3 . Water ° ° ° 4. Plants ° ° ° ° 5. Animals A ° ° ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources X ° ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° ',}/ ° ° ° ° 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° ° ° ° 9. Housing ° ° ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° A ° ° ° 11. Light & Glare 0 X ° 0 ° ° O 12 . Recreation ° ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation .,"` ° ° ° t40, ,s:. 14. Transportation ° 4 ° ° ° 15. Public Services ° ° ° ° 16. Utilities X ° COMMENTS: See attachment. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where ddi ional i ormation is needed to properly assess this proposal. C7, Fe;IA. 8, 19. , Signature of Director o uthorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 i 11 II SA-125-88 ACCORD, INC. Taco Time Office Building 1. Determine service level at intersection of Monroe Ave. SE & Maple Valley Highway. 2. Determine if channelization upgrade is required or needed on the east leg of the intersection (Monroe Ave. NE) . 3. Determine proper street width to meet City standards. 4. Submittal of street light plan to City standards will be required. 5. Area is located in a proposed traffic benefit zone. Bonding will be required at $197.00 per trip generated. Final assessment based on pending study by City. 6. Determine number of trips generate per ITE Manual . 1 -L.1TON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN`r L PARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: lim{Fc. DATE CIRCULATED: January 19, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: February 9, 1989 ECF-125-88 PLANNING DIVISION I APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-125-88 CITY OF RENTON IA, , 1 PROPONENT: ACCORD, INC. JAN 3 p 1989 PROJECT TITLE: Taco. Time Office Building ECEIVEPJ , BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct an office building and a storage building in a B-1 zone. LOCATION: Maple Valley Highway and Monroe Ave. S.E. ' SITE AREA 43, 196 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : Office: 7,792 sq. ft. Storage: 1,920 sq.ft. ' IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° yt ° . . ° 2 . Air ° ,k ° . . . 3 . Water ° X ° O O . 4 . Plants 0 A. ° o ° . 5. Animals ° aC ° o ° . 6. Energy & Natural Resources 0 X ° . . • 7. Environmental Health ° , ' ° ° . . 18. Land & Shoreline Use X ° ° . . 9 . Housing 0 �( ° 0 . . 10. Aesthetics • K ° ° ° . . 11. Light & Glare x 00 112 . Recreation X ° o 0 . 13 . ,Historic & Cultural Preservation X ° . . • 1 14 . Transportation K ° 0 . ° 15. Public Services 0 X ° 16. Utilities ° 1 \ ° ° I - . COMMENTS: 1 ,ve_. Zk.v-ye_ i�-ecs ®,i 4 t IWe have reviewed this application with pp particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are ', where a itional 'nf• mation is needed to properly assess th' s pr posal. IN z' g5 ! Sign ure of Dir c(• ( or Authorized Representative Da e -' y Rev. 6/88 REN1Ok COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT } DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-12 5-s s pt p►NNtNG DIVISION CM Of RENTON APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-125-88 ® Jo3 0 1989 PROPONENT: ACCORD, INC. E C ‘11 PROJECT TITLE: Taco Time Office Building P� BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to build an office building and a storage building in a B-1 zone. LOCATION: Maple Valley Highway and Monroe Ave. S.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: Feb. 15, 1989 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON FEBRUARY 9, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED / siodr 750e0E_ ©, 010,? e nye d v,, P f e.„4_ e,�, P,,DPds-c.i./ Z, S� e oR /L( owe e /(� �� /-27 Li cc as (o. v.1 /`p a n.o e .le s%'J--7 f4�s 4 3yds DATE _ 2 SIGNATURE OF I C 0 OR AUTI-TORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 - i REN J COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT D ,RTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-125-88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-125-88 PROPONENT: ACCORD, INC. PROJECT TITLE: Taco Time Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to build an office building and a storage building in a B-1 zone. LOCATION: Maple Valley Highway and Monroe Ave. S.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: Feb. 15, 1989 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON FEBRUARY 9, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 7-7-- 12_ &aim j►����•� st J � APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS X NOT APPROVED /o Se��C •Gig/�''� G S fi `4-� �✓/ / o f, j 6 LL�p n f� U /%cf J�E !s�^.��c� p (1 r J..�) r �y , d4 ,, :3 4,/8 V 'grfi �0 i�S i%H�C c��(� /l9D S/f�f+ /i�2, �+?.'�'�/ 20 D�1 - -� 0-7 -e 1_,41 za4-1 o L.4. c L -� ,e- � t 1 l�7 1'~' _!--'__•_r_.!-C=: � � �• G9 J r'!a_.L7 /'yam! "`=:s'-_�1�='="�cr•? l�-J�, I, .r t^. 6_ 41-J.�.n `lJ �^ 3 �L/:g - �-5 1���t!/i c ry��c7G�ld' ✓ ery _ 3btx si ti E� s�� Li-2 e) ;X2 5 2-rt6 � f� � 5����t /f 17,1 1��Q �n �' _a-d.>f.21.5" 1-d; 1.( C 1,-("c) 5 o A-1 s G ��� a. ^ P-Yo-�c,s� 7-Y�T � ��<'AGo y�o 1/ k -2 1.4 e 1°'/ 97, "n cry.l� DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR A ORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 o. 1 Hof s �c �;G /�f 41V s - _ / P Y Phan V `-‘,-,' i RENTC_. 2OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DER, _'MENT h.NFL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHE CFI REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: J-h 1 r\i � �� '^ 8 DATE CIRCULATED: January 19, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: Februak I q 89 � /c ,, ECF-125-88 �' APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-125-88 PROPONENT: ACCORD, INC. ' PROJECT TITLE: Taco Time Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct an office building and a storage building in a B-1 zone. LOCATION: Maple Valley Highway and Monroe Ave. S.E. SITE AREA 43 , 196 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : Office: 7,792 sq. ft. Storage: 1,920 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° ° o ° ° 2 . Air ° ° ° o ° ° 3 . Water ° 0 0 O ° ° 4 . Plants 0 ° ° o 0 0 5. Animals ° 0 ° o 0 ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources 0 ° 0 I0 ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° O ° ° 8. Land & Shoreline Use • ° 0 ° ° ° 9 . Housing ° ° ° ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° 0 ° o ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° ° o ° ° iI 12 . Recreation ° ° ° ° ° 'I 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° O ° ° 14 . Transportation ° ° 1i ° ° ° 15. Public Services ° ° ° 1 ° ✓ 0 0 16. Utilities ° ° ° I COMMENTS: We have reviewed i application with particular attention to those areas which we have exp -rti - and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional inf. ii.n is needed to properly assess this proposal. ri A!A. /- 27 - irf Signature of Dir: ctor or Authorized Representative Date I Rev. 6/88 ' /-24-ef 4461 1 c. i RENTON c:uMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARnENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-125-88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-125-88 PROPONENT: ACCORD, INC. PROJECT TITLE: Taco Time Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to build an office building and a storage building in a B-1 zone. LOCATION: Maple Valley Highway and Monroe Ave. S.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: Feb. 15, 1989 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: x UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION r r- SHORT RANGE J A N 2 7 :1989 iD) LONG RANGE U Lb ll v i PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON FEBRUARY 9, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Ont./rY Fiv 'A)g ,Vo APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS .... NOT APPROVED q(ZOME A. $P.4 UTILITY APPROVAL SU9WEGT TIJ LATE COVERS ADREEMEN-s"-t? 1 /4Q� H .EtS4 . 6IN✓/S/ON ' SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT H.:: _.- _ - IP:LJ� '! DP LDT 0 p stew SYSTEM DEVELOP@:;:.:7 _ O.t x ,1 v.. ,�I728 �® ! /3L" Nt) SPECIAL ASSESS!."E:;:,.:. t::. MO0 . RAI ex CM"? SPECIAL ASSESSMEE": :.. 3/Ar6,o® ??PeaOY cD WATER PLO arc 420 1 APK3'./EO SEEDER PLEI rieit tO 2 Cl APwt.OiiED FIRE IIYOR�1 d :.,.f. L:,,._, 1 „ BY FIRE C r. lYGI1, (f/ F C'C-7P.:::LYS�9 it1 0 cult itito r hap Solo sib sibr, GP" M43I `o DATE 01/07 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE J REV. 6/88 6.t : /-z¢ ?9 If 26,Pdi .--7: 06ae . A- q- g'9 I I.. ;i ._ RE_ _ IN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT L__ARTMENT 11 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST..�� REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: \ OItC$ e snecYe�l�(m DATE CIRCULATED: January 19, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: February 9, 1989 ECF-125-88 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-125-88 PROPONENT: ACCORD, INC. PROJECT TITLE: Taco Time Office Building d BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct an office building and a storage building in a B-1 zone. II LOCATION: Maple Valley Highway and Monroe Ave. S.E. SITE AREA 43, 196 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : Office: 7,792 sq. ft. Storage: 1,920 sq. ft. i IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION '1 IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 0 0 O 0 0 2 . Air ° 0 . . 0 0 3 . Water ° 0 . . 0 0 I ' 4 . Plants ° ° 0 . . 0 1 5. Animals ° ° . . . . 6. Energy & Natural Resources 0 0 ° . 0 . 7 . Environmental Health ° ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° ° . O O . 9 . Housing . . . . . . 10. Aesthetics ° 0 . . . . 11. Light & Glare ° ° . . 12 . Recreation 0 ° ° . . . 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° I 0 14 . Transportation ° ° ° . . . b. 15. Public Services ° ° 1 0 0 0 16. Utilities 0 ° . COMMENTS I We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where ad 'tiona information is needed to properly assess this proposal. I Sign a of D r ctor or Authorized Representative Date 7f/OP Rev. 6/88 t , 1 RENT.. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DErLaTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-125-88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-125-88 PROPONENT: ACCORD, INC. PROJECT TITLE: Taco Time Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval- to build an office building and a storage building in a B-1 zone. LOCATION: Maple Valley Highway and Monroe Ave. S.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: Feb. 15, 1989 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE > PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON FEBRUARY 9, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: A^,6e f• ieecv,G$ -7'o•�, APPROVED /( APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED /14 k ce-t ;74( Z a�e. , • 1 �/?/,fi C 4 de7r.geGveor. Pee J ' ‘ / A-te 9¢)f .,C TGICtc;° Sc`iic . 7"4,dPr l/o'�.va.cee Gam. 4017 r '#- CI 're- �E,r�./ 1�4f G� /Attie Se 4s'e , Gt / eei --� DATE 26/f/ t SIGN E OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 e, i,z : REN'TON. /"'< '/ cadr - '©• _ _IMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPA] _ .ENT la 2 vl� ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET` ,e 3 4989 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: \-au.iictirAPI �� DATE CIRCULATED: January 19, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: February 9, 1989 ECF-125-88 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-125-88 PROPONENT: ACCORD, INC. , - - PROJECT TITLE: Taco Time Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct an office building and a storage building in a B-1 zone. LOCATION: Maple Valley Highway and Monroe Ave. S.E. SITE AREA 43, 196 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : Office: 7,792 sq.ft. Storage: 1,920 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth • • • • • • 2 . Air • • 0 • • • 3 . Water • • 0 • • • 4. Plants 0 • • • • • 5. Animals • • • 0 • • 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 0 • • • • 7 . Environmental Health ° 0 0 • 0 • 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° ° 0 9 . Housing • • • • • O 10. Aesthetics • • 0 • • 11. Light & Glare ° • • • • 12 . Recreation • • • 0 • 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° • • • 14 . Transportation • • • • • 15. Public Services ° 0 0 0 • 0 16. Utilities • • ° COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and ha e identified areas of probable impact or are where additional nformation ' s needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature •f Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 RENTON G&.:. UNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPART=s__JT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-125-88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-125-88 PROPONENT: ACCORD, INC. PROJECT TITLE: Taco Time Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to build an office building and a storage building in a B-1 zone. LOCATION: Maple Valley Highway and Monroe Ave. S.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: Feb. 15, 1989 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON FEBRUARY 9, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: /P L7) APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED (c:) e ezh (./& l, DATE SIGNATURE OF DIREC R OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 RE____JN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT L.J ARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: S'ToRr\ 1,c1YER I ' DATE CIRCULATED: January 19, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: February 9, 1989 P(.1n",,, ECF-125-88 1g�? /Iirn,, i-HEAti APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-125-88 'r:J';ES L 8 PROPONENT: ACCORD, INC. Li U 1989 r P PROJECT TITLE: Taco Time Office Building O ' I BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct an office building and a storage building in a B-1 zone. LOCATION: Maple Valley Highway and Monroe Ave. S.E. SITE AREA 43, 196 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : Office: 7,792 sq.ft. Storage: 1,920 sq. ft. 1 IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° . . . 2 . Air 0 0 . 1' . 0 0 1 ' 3 . Water ° ° . 0 . 4 . Plants ° 0 . . . . 1 5. Animals 0 ° ° O . ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° ° ° . . 7 . Environmental Health 0 ° 0 . . 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° 0 . 9 . Housing ° 0 0 ° . . 10. Aesthetics ° ° ° ' . . . 11. Light & Glare ° ° . . . . 12 . Recreation ° ° . 1 . . . 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° ° . 14. Transportation ° ° . . . I; 15. Public Services ° . . O 16. Utilities 0 ° p COMMENTS: A/o 06)eck0 kn IL-0 Cov)c9 o,9of` We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. "72 /77r Signa ure of Director or thorized Representative Date ' 1I Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-125-88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-125-88 PROPONENT: ACCORD, INC. PROJECT TITLE: Taco Time Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to build an office building and a storage building in a B-1 zone. LOCATION: Maple Valley Highway and Monroe Ave. S.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: Feb.15, 1989 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: StoYm \ 4ot€. COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON FEBRUARY 9, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ,„5‹ APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Gory cep 7 SIGNATURE 0 DIRECTOR'OR AUTHORE DATE 2D REPRESENTATIVE z, REV. 6/88 ON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN t, .2ARTMENT P/4",9i, tf, , ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW S , TJ4N h,,:, REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: (,unr St Plann1 e, 31 7 �� t 69 DATE CIRCULATED: January 19, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: February 94 1989 ECF-125-88 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-125-88 PROPONENT: ACCORD, INC. I PROJECT TITLE: Taco Time Office Building 1 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct an ' office building and a storage building in a B-1 zone. ,j LOCATION:AMaple Valley Highway and Monroe Ave. S.E. i'UOI\Yl ff3'f I 010i C1t0 U c SITE AREA 43, 196 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : Office: 7,792 sq.ft. :i Storage: 1,920 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° . . . . 2 . Air ° . ° . . 3 . Water 0 ° . . 0 . 4 . Plants 0 ° . . • 0 5. Animals 0 . , ° . • 6. Energy & Natural Resources • / ° j 0 .1 . 7 . Environmental Health ° ' 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° o I ° 0 9 . Housing ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° 0 . / 0 . 11. Light & Glare ° . 1 • / • . 12 . Recreation ° ° • 0 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation I 0 . f . . 1 14 . Transportation 0 15. Public Services ° • k O . ' 16. Utilities 0 ° 1 COgMENTS: I c V)ECO ��Erv0 YDN I 1 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are 1 where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ' J1M 1'� " Signature of rector or Authorized Representative Date 1 Rev. 6/88 I d RElg`GN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT IORTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-125-88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-125-88 PROPONENT: ACCORD, INC. PROJECT TITLE: Taco Time Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to build an office building and a storage building in a B-1 zone. LOCATION Maple Valley Highway and Monroe Ave. S.E. ivU r,7HE f5T' I J1 e6C-1 TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: Feb. 15, 1989 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION _SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON FEBRUARY 9, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: PLWIvI1119 A►Or-loN) APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED PR OIDC; Pr)v�.J wrkee,w't FRovn fUILOi►Uy TO \PPL vm,LL -( HIOIMN,j „ DATE —3 I e SIGNATURE OF DIREC O fAUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 [ "i1 ri • • f . i REND d COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHE ) F 6��"��: REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: cli-emlr„ ? ' i ' n •cr1 DATE CIRCULATED: January 19, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: February 9, §2 98c9 PLANNING DIVISION (% ECF-125-88 CITY OF RENTON /�' APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-125-88 JAN 1 9 1989 PROPONENT: ACCORD, INC. _ f C E O v I� lid PROJECT TITLE: Taco Time Office Building l�l 15 Irl IS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct an office building and a storage building in a B-1 zone. LOCATION: Maple Valley Highway and Monroe Ave. S.E. SITE AREA 43, 196 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : Office: 7,792 sq.ft. Storage: 1,920 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth • 1:1 • . . • 2 . Air • 0 0 ° • 0 3 . Water • • c • . . • 4 . Plants 0 • • • •" 1 0 5. Animals 0 • . • • 6. Energy & Natural Resources • 7 . Environmental Health • • 7 • • . . 8 . Land & Shoreline Use • 0 < 0 9 . Housing 0 • 0 • . • 10. Aesthetics K • 11. Light & Glare . • . ° 12 . Recreation • • 0 • . .- 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation • 14 . Transportation • • • 15. Public Services 0 • 0 • • . 16. Utilities 0 • • COMMENTS: P,o i_ v 4 GINNst.e�.,, - S" �o--c..••C d,,�, � .-(......1- ?oso y� -•y� "ti'�`" °�""M-Q"1 ►'`�°'`-�`Jv�°�`�.Q�- c.,.� /rcQ',�.. . We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional 'nformation is needed to properly assess this proposal. Sign ure f irector or A thorized Representat ve Date N19 Rev. 6/88 411 RENTuff COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-125-88 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-125-88 JAN 1 9 1989 PROPONENT: ACCORD, INC. PROJECT TITLE: Taco Time Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to build an office building and a storage building in a B-1 zone. LOCATION: Maple Valley Highway and Monroe Ave. S.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: Feb.15, 1989 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON FEBRUARY 9, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS KNOT APPROVED I...LA.-0 1.0.-4-4- 6A.,......,,,,,LA.,....tr....-t-....A.AAAn .41.4-44.4.. ‘fr.,„„,,aci A.A A..eL , ,��"�1 .� C [ DATE a IGNATURE O4 IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE2 / / REV. 6/88 ZONING DIVISION PLAN CHECK WORKSHEET APPLICANT: Acc,oycl, I . ADDRESS: 1°I11 Mo.PIG Vo.(161 K�ghwa PHONE: 2..a I.S6 PROJECT NAME: Taco Ttme, 0-7-eice, B(o( LAND USE ZONE: Qras i htSS D )t-tc.t R- 1 BRIEF DESCRIPTION: ppi,c.h-t 366KS site a?pw0v0.1 +0 utld emA p ` ice h�►1a�hrj 1h CA. V-1 Z.Ohe. }ApIYOVoI a,kb LS 5O A hi V' O. 5t01r6t.cse brn► O11 +tie sl�e DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Required/Allowed Project Okay a. Density ho 5?ecr-Cic.1lops b. Lot Size 43, 1'16 t. 43, 11.6 n , c. Lot Width d. Lot Depth e. Setbacks 1. Front for ,Ol l 1 2. Side Si by S,k r'_e.ace 5 i" to -CehCe /5/ or 3. Rear 5 + to •Cehce. 5 -f 9ehcG f. Special Setbacks g. Height 96 ►ylaX• i(, " max. h. Lot Coverage 5 '7o I ?a i. Signs j. Landscaping/ , r Screening 15 or 5 + ( a'CGhtx, 15 Or 5 * fp �GhcC k. Irrigation 1. Parking/Loading ► ptY j°p 9Yege s-'c4 3 % 35 f NoPoscd qtY ,,soo gYoSs Si,� " 1 7, • Required Parking Stalls • Compact • Handicapped • Driveways (width) • Loading Areas • Aisle Widths m. Recreation n. Bonds } E.R.C. CONDITIONS Satisfied Not Satisfied • .I HEARING EXAMINER CONDITIONS Satisfied Not Satisfied COMMENTS/RESOLUTION OF ABOVE I Reviewer Date FORM 210 , ‘ Tacolirne • ACCORD, INC. 1911 Maple Valley Highway Renton,Washington 98055 (206)226-6656 January 16, 1989 City of Renton Zoning Dept. 200 Mill ST. Renton, WA. 98055 I • ATTN: DON ERICKSON Dear Don, Enclosed are copies of Geo - Engineers Assessment of the Dobson Property for your approval. I • cerel„ 41. .. Love PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON JL:j l D , 'JAN 1 8 1989 irp "ANYTIME IS TACO TIME" • v - 0`` GeopO Engineers January 13, 1989 Consulting Geotechnical Engineers and Geologists Olympic Pipe Line Company 2319 Lind Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057 Attention: Mr. William Mulkey Summary of Property Assessment Dobson Property, Northeast Corner of Maple Valley Highway and Monroe Avenue Southeast Maplewood Neighborhood Renton, Washington File No. 0894-02-4 This letter -summarizes our assessment of residual petroleum contamination on the property owned by Mr. Dobson at the northeast corner of the intersection between Maple Valley Highway and Monroe Avenue Southeast in Renton, Washington. We understand that an application for development of the property is presently being considered by the City of Renton Planning Department. This assessment has been requested to assist the City in determining the potential environmental significance of the proposed project. We further understand that the proposed development is a two story, wood—frame office building with associated parking. The property is located in the vicinity of an underground fuel leak that occurred from the Olympic Pipe Line Company fuel pipeline facility which traverses the Maplewood Neighborhood. The leak from the pipeline is estimated to have begun during the late summer to early fall of 1985. Active cleanup of the resulting fuel—related contamination began in late 1986 and continued through late 1988. Environmental monitoring in the affected area is ongoing. The property is located within the limits of GeoEngineers,Inc. 2405 140th Ave.NE,Suite 105 Bellevue,WA 98005 Telephone(206)746-5200 Fax.(206)746-5068 , Geode Engineers Olympic Pipe Line Company January 13, 1989 Page 2 • an area that was initially contaminated with free (floating) fuel product on the water table, hydrocarbon vapors in the soil, and dissolved fuel— related contaminants in the ground water. Remedial efforts related to the spill addressed each type of contamination. Remedial efforts and monitoring activities are described in detail in a series of progress reports, all of which have been provided to the City of Renton Engineering Department. A number of exploratory, remedial, and monitoring installations were completed on the Dobson property as part of the remedial efforts to mitigate the effects of the fuel leak. We understand that Olympic Pipe Line Company leased parts of the property for these installations. The installations on the property included a vapor recovery system, a recovery well, and several product/vapor monitor wells. Active remedial efforts to mitigate the effects of the leak were phased out in late 1988 (with Department of Ecology concurrence) due to the effectiveness of the cleanup. that had been accomplished by that time. Mr. Dobson approached Olympic Pipe Line Company in late 1988 regarding the possible dismantling of remedial installation on his property. In order to evaluate Mr. Dobson's request, GeoEngineers reviewed ongoing monitoring data and performed additional explorations, including a series of soil vapor probes on surrounding property and one exploratory soil boring in the center of the Dobson property. The additional explorations are detailed in Progress Report No. 8 which is presently being prepared. As a result of our investigations, it was the opinion of GeoEngineers that further use of recovery and monitoring installations on the Dobson property were not needed. We discussed our conclusion with Ecology and received their concurrence. Abandonment of on—site installations was completed during November 1988. Residual fuel—related contamination is present in soils beneath the site at a depth of about 18 to 20 feet. This depth corresponds with a zone that is located near and below the typical low ground water levels. ' Chemical testing of the remaining residual contamination in the soils ..........a-..n•^i'.`.f'4+T^wi•.-S...t..y.._..-.,.....r±e..,..m....�......-....t..,....-r..^..:+tmnvY... rj...-r -r. "R,.?^'M..v t ..,.... ....-......-_._.._.....-..-«._ ..__..... ..-.,_.... .e....._... .. .-._, ............. Geoff Engineers Olympic Pipe Line Company January 13, 1989 Page 3 indicated that the residual hydrocarbons consist of a relatively heavy residue and that the lighter, more volatile hydrocarbons have been removed from the soil both by active and passive means. As a result, the remaining residue will not tend to act as a significant source of generation of fuel—related subsurface vapors. The residue will also continue to degrade through natural processes. Ground water beneath the site contains low concentrations of fuel— related contaminants . Generally, ground water quality beneath the affected area has been improving at a rapid rate during the past year. Most monitor wells tested presently meet federal drinking water standards 1 for the fuel—related contaminant of greatest concern — benzene. We do not believe that ground water quality beneath the property will present any impacts to site development. To summarize, ' low concentrations of residual, fuel—related contamination are present at a depth to 18 to 20 feet beneath the ground surface on the property. This residual contamination will continue to be removed by natural processes. It is our opinion that this existing contamination will not impact the proposed development of the property. — 0 0 0 — We appreciate the opportunity to be of service. Please call if you have any questions about this letter. Yours very truly, GeoEngineers c. Stephen C. Perrigo Wast Management S cialist . Miller, P.E. SCP:JAM:dk r' cipal Two copies submitted ;I.,:., Mr"r - .,. . , .-"-,-- ''~ .. -•----"�- ___-•..Y _r- ..,__- �(cY ® C. TY OF . RENTOJ - FILE NO(S): 'SA - /IS-81 to 4=1 BL$ )ING & ZONING DEPARTML.. - ru N MASTER APPLICATION . NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) ore to be completed. (Please print or type. Attoch additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME FEES CC-409.0 I {JG . ` r �,/ —f Q REZONE*(FROM TO ) ADDRESS p l I 1 �I A-R-�`) V ik-Uc—G 1 I C] SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY ZIP 0 TEMPORARY PERMIT* g-5VS-rc' l� UQ 5-5 Q CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* I CJ 21 SITE PLAN APPROVAL . TELEPHONE n Q SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL L [n-C.p - (Q 6 5(7 . No. of Cubic Yards: CONTACT PERSON VARIANCE* From Section: NAME • * Justification Required 9OL G S.`( 4 ' ADDRESS // /y, Cr, � SUBDIVISIONS: t o l l(0 '✓(Q+h A\,p Gi ` `W i'� Q SHORT PLAT CITYT C� L� � �ZIP Q TENTATIVE PLAT 'v"f� I PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE CDFINAL PLAT 4- " S2c 7 WAIVER I (Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: /NAME PLAT NAME: do•( "I-i _ po epc, / ED UNIT DEVELOPMENT:ADDRESS - --ii++. _ PLANN T� . (QC0 II t ( L:: Q PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP - Q FINAL 5 0-CC" ( LA P.U.D. NAME; TELEPHONE _ _ __ _ 25 5-86eir I EJ Residential Q Industrial 0 Commercial D Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS M 'P�5 V _i_eY iwY e M0090e ws 5,.e, CD TENTATIVE EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING PRELIMINARY ULID, 5�SP y., 1 FINAL PROPOSED USE �J PARK NAME: ' cYFFice T30t (.-t7I C-/- Te. NUMBER OF SPACES: --ri6cGC) I I I"l ® ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 1 QL" • SQ. FT. ACRES AREA: - TOTAL FEES 41,5 .4.14. . PLANK,,,„ rS,T,,,F USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING �� APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: �� DATE STAMP CITY��R£NTt,; DD EC 2 9 1988 _-- APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: '�' ,S Accepted L4 [)// �. ED Incomplete Notification Sent On By: l7/ (Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: I III \ b APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: 0 Accepted , Q Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials)_ ROUTED TO: QBuilding Q Design Eng. Q Fire U Parks 0 Police El Policy Dev. Traffic Eng. Q Utilities REVISED 1-31-Rd • Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). M tMI.- (�.j OC)D *2 62 jT �Tlc) 4-0 L-Cc cJ AAO IA) _ CIF Lo r l I c c 1 (, <7isc t 0 (<c,D L i-r C3 Ai `tJl-1 c t 1 0 O e( 1 I 1c 501 `1-1-4'(0 C- O C{a I C7CD it Lc1 tic 17--(--(4-- Ig-(._`t` 4 L C7 12 a ,‘--71- - L9" AFFIDAVIT �� �J� _I , being duly sworn, declare that I am ®authorized representative to act for the property owner, =owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS �571- DAY OF l7cc-c-0-,/ae/e ... ..__.. 19 cS c!. OFFICIAL SEAL ANN TURPIN NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF NOTARY FI 1IC-STATE OF WASHINGTON WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT MY COr,1h1;SSfON EXP;RES: 6 6 92 • olCf401%tk-14141.14L- (Name of Notary Public) (Signature of Owner) (Address) (Address) 'Le A Y1 v..14:,1/4• g® (City) (State) (Zip) ACtig (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Form #174= The Casey ( lup LIE1T1 EE 0I unkma 1U1T1TaL U.. Architects 10116 36th Ave. Ct. SW, Suite 203 Tacoma, WA 98499 DATE v2 /2 / 8 JOB Ne.,n, 24 f ATTENTION G/ CJ� L ' 1 RE: X� TO G t; 1 1 C N `0 `f"c' T t 6 WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached El Under separate cover via the following items: — El Shop drawings Prints 0 Plans El Samples 0 Specifications Copy of letter 0 Change order 0 COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 7 4 Arc , t✓ t , 4 �t J ( L. *RBI o-- < P I 4' RA1-- O U GTId i-S (C, lJ Q t (ZO 0 M e h-)rPe( _ C.,t-Ir t a G 4- _ (evi- 1 4 Mk t L.1 k--)cr L- L'' 1 2 M¢-e--T (2. P PL_‘c „p.T-(c3(1,..J I 2- c 2 t 1 c tv4N cc-F. No ( -Ftc-N-T(cDU so P-D4 Avc i-}T' ? P 2 0L .e2, I 8 L EP 9S c--(Le" -w THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: AFor approval ❑ Approved as submitted 0 Resubmit copies for approval El For your use El Approved as noted ❑ Submit _ copies for distribution ❑ As requested El Returned for corrections 0 Return • corrected prints El For review and comment El ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS PLANla2J4) U l/',! j u CITY J/ Jorc 2 3 .1988 'n iiuticEllw 9, COPY TO SIGNED: PRODUCT 240.3 / f Inc.Groton,Mass 01471 If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. V , OF ECF: l25'8o t$ © z City of Renton LU: [sr. ta5o ea o P ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 9�TFD SEPle Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making ;,:decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose fif, this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts - from your'proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully. to the best of your knowledge. In most ''cases. you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information 'that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) • Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though,questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). . For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: TA cc Ti me O L-D l ti (y1M'L t< Vhl-L Wc i'-( ) 2. Name of applicant: c'M) L J • Gee `( "Fog tic cc.c5go . tL.) G 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact-person: Ac.caieO t ►-lC , Gtst�E`( gc)- i P Mect4 1911 -iM'L \PiL.LSY Ww1/ 1°110 30 MjE. ReNTo w 1 U) %So-5 D 22e- 616)5( S0 cTt ?sz3 4. Date checklist,prepared: c� M w4,r q 84- 12/2S/86 • 5. Agency requesting checklist: R.Ari.11-1 l tJCA 'pe vor 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing. if applicable): c.1p2 l a C. . Ma cry N-iT`L oc•-rio u ST'#RT (-.0/ !s M o , cc)b t u c rtc)w S c.ti-e' u t' NNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON D DEC 2 9 1988 -) E 7. Do you have any plans for future additions. expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. 1\10 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Noun 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Na�.1� 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. testae . t< c r t6teo G'G1v k- 6 J -r6`1' T G (T`C. o \2•5 tJ'C-cD v.I 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. GousT12oc-r A- ? , 742 I c tGs 5o\ Lptb-1CA- PrtJ0 is, ( 2d SToc c , VOtLVi �k 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description. site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 1-1 PL 1#2 Lc)c- M PcPL.t; V 16cLL tr`t' Li4"{ AST T ) I ka-rsCiec.r to B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat rolling, hilly. steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? '2 fb c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. -t-ce y L isc--t- e uR F�c-e `r-Asi cA c_ Milir tz.t 65r L. C 4 LA-( w/ x�M . y((.-D %-.1v) d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. 14U .I - 2 - e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Hlut Nthl. E cRr F-loVERt -'T luC. TE%.rT'PtCr `Co cc>Ocol Cz .)c.t- t o 4..) �oR Vlrxr« , No oFr-`?I Trt LC.. AN'rtc t*FAr C7 f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. �10 g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or t20c7c> h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: t 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally . describe and give approximate quantities if known. t.aST2Uc.-C'l0b.) Vc9 col' b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: • 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows t•icn 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Nc 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Nc� UG. • - 3 - 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. 140 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. `3421r'14. C*- 1_C)T "C'tz.= VU M 172 U CTS 1 cV b-lT P� _ Tn V H t c O t✓N CL l ca K t 0i C.'C • b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Seen(. S'(e7Te•M 130 T (Jeveg ) 13'{k 1 L. Yr 'bU t..17 kic--i SrO R An ORA-1 L AG--t e C4'6-1 5c- `tom'" C. (147 --fro 5`(40TE4/1 c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. 1U QC *-gc)M '(JU 1 L t7\ C 4 ('�pr ke.K. CA- PigEPA Tv 136 Gc,L c.G—c-TE rJ t U w Pe 62 U to O 'CST E.WI" 10 aJ c-�t P�� 44%-i3O re A - �- To 11-1 G t'DI/ (ST€M , •l �1 GAS 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. - 4 -. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: UL.1pE *f2oU VE"sb-rcl0 `pliveG✓ 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of v tation found on the site: A deciduous tree: @Icier, mapl , aspen, other evergreen tree fir ce ar,"pine, other g-912 o c' o Shrubs grass o crop or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other o other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? c0/144tuu x 11Z 6. 211 TR c.) 04 Ks) 4 c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: LANOc,c.#Pe -i2L 0 . . 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds:, Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other. , Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be'on or near the site. kbwe c. . Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. 'NO - 5 - d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy electri atural gas oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project s energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. t -rl iic* . 4 Ll c#4-r11,1 C-t Oar b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: 150 tC.Q\uC-1 cJlC.C. oge-olcA,-E -Veig 1986? wPe- 1 uc.1- -c -e ca c1' 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. TR.eqtoUS !-1ocTVRiscl.r LE,4K occ.oR.o N ,kz e , 4-t=.c...)avec2 ) coeaTecol. M-e AhuR kti.v te .) Nz HUED 4,6wtJ a w US( Wt U -9c2cv‘OS UDR -T-t Lc# c. )ge.€01" 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. cjrAT-u5 o• Sv LS i 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? C, 0 k-) 1 L A`% - 6 - I \ - 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on, a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic. construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. G o‘1-1&-ar L'c- - tJ M 3 ►M Ta CQ PM 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? U 1J C2E\.1 lr� S cr-t. b-) USe47 b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. 1-40 c. Describe any structures on the site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? 1 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? t-loT K 14o Lk.) 6,1 g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? lJ , , h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. 4 i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? t�l c) k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: �1otse - 7 - 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and • projected land uses and plans, if any: R1 4 Q Sc•fz Ede ItJC 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: 10.= Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. So) b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? woNe c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: `Pei ►,•tom CLgeSNt �- -, 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? at d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: tJc� u � — 8 - /r> 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? 'Ocrr KNdc�tl b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. �0 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation ' J a. Are there any places or objects listed on, Dr proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. NoN c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if-any: '1.1c) 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving-the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? No-r w w c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). cok oe wPruK fcLo - ' 42.`ric:%6J • - 9 - 1 e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. O - gO g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: 'Met.) ea t-R e t t- i 4-ok iac v o{✓TJ Acp.list E IOT Tin VIZ''J E 1r%-t `( 15. Public Services - I a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. .00 b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. NO 16. Utilities a. Circle • • _ -nt - ail-bl • - site: electricit a�tural water 4422=a1 telephone CISIMMEIMIP septic sys em, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Et-EGT2 tC.t { G.r ,Pi- 0 0e W rt�2 creQE(Z. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. i Proponent: � • ` ( - o Name Printed: 4594. REGISTERED ARCHITECT PALUL J.CASEY° STATE ®F WAS€ INGTON - 10 - 4fl•7g 11_52 IPd • • LEASE AGREEMENT d THIS LEASE made and entered into this `~ day of goptrefilkoax, 1988 , by and between JOHN W. DOBSON, as owner in his separate right, Lessor , hereinafter referred to as "Landlord" , and ACCORD, INC. , a Washington Corporation, Lessee, hereinafter referred to as "Tenant" , WITNESSET H: 1.. DESCRIPTION OF DEMISED PREMISES: Landlord hereby leases to tenant on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth that certain real property located in the City of Renton , County of King , State of Washington, described generally as follows : Lot 9, Block 6, Maplewood Addition No . 2 , EXCEPT that portion described as follows : Beginning at the most westerly corner of Lot 1, Block 6 said addition thence S 61 09 ' 15 " E 50 ' thence S 09 55 ' 00 " W 51 ' thence N 65 05 ' 00 " .W 40 ' thence Northerly along Westerly line of said Lot 9 to point of beginning and Except that portion taken for SR 169. 2 . EFFECTIVE DATE: This lease shall be for a term of twenty (20 ) years commencing on the date of issuance of occupancy permit if issued on the first day of the month otherwise commencing on the first day of the month fallowing issuance of occupancy permit . 2A. Tenant shall have use of premises rent free until issuance of a building permit, not to exceed four ( 4) months, and shall pay one-half (1/2) rent from the time of the issuance of the building permit until issuance of certificate of occupancy, not to exceed six (6) months. All payments shall be made on the first day of the month and if payments differ , they shall be prorated on a per diem basis. DOBSON, HOVeER et DOBSON r- - '' 'n 0 °,•!�I� P.O.BOX OS —1- 1 ;it' fl .l- TON . RENTON, WA.OOOe7 TeEe.HONE 255-ee41 D; DEC 2 9 1988 /// 3 . EXTENSION: Provided that tenant is not in default of its obligations under this lease , tenant shall have the option to extend this lease upon the same terms and conditions as herein contained for one ( 1 ) additional period of five ( 5 ) years commencing on the date on which the original term of this lease terminates . Notice of tenant intention to exercise the option to extend shall be given to landlord at least ninety (90) days prior to the expiration of the term of this lease . 4. RENTAL: The premises are hereby leased for the above-mentioned term at a monthly rental of payable in advance on the first day of each month . During the term of the lease and any extension thereof, the monthly rental shall be adjusted upward and downward as of the first day of each three year period according to the computation hereinafter described , provided that no adjustment shall have the effect of increasing the monthly rent by more than 15% over the rent in effect for the preceeding period or lowering the monthly rental below the original rental . The computation shall be based upon the Consumer Pr 'ce Tndex , Pacific Cities , Seattle , All Urban ConsumersVfor a lly rb3n rc i —Seattle/Everett arca published by the United States Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics or such successor index that may be substituted by mutual agreement . The base index figure shall be the figure in effect three ( 3 ) months before the commencement of said three ( 3 ) year period and a percentage increase in the figure three (3) years thereafter and the increase or decrease shall be applied to the rent then in effect subject to the limitations herein set forth. The procedure shall be repeated for each three (3 ) year period during the continuation of the tenancy. 5 . IMPROVEMENTS AND ALTERATIONS : Subsequent to tenant 's acquisition of all necessary permits, tenant shall have the right DOBSON. HOUSER @ DOBSON P.O. fOX 0Y RENTON. WA.90009 TELEPHONE 200•®041 . . I •' � to alter , renovate or demolish any improvements that may then be existing upon the demised premises and from time to time construct a new building , land improvements or other additions or alterations thereto as may be desirable . Any such altered , renovated or reconstructed buildings shall become the property of landlord upon the expiration or sooner termination of this lease. 6 . USE OF DEMISED PREMISES : Tenant may use the demised premises for the purpose of constructing an office building , or for any other legally permissible business or commercial venture ; provided however , that tenant shall not use the demised premises in such. a manner as to violate any applicable law, rule, ordinance or regulation of any governmental body which would have a material impact upon tenant ' s ability to use the demised. premises. 7 . MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS : Tenant covenants and agrees at its sole cost and expense at all times during the term of this lease to maintain and keep the demised premises in an orderly condition and in a good state of repair . ' 8 . TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS : Tenant will pay all real estate taxes and assessments payable against the demised premises during the term hereof. Real estate taxes payable during the first and last years of this lease shall be pro-rated based on the tax year of the taxing jurisdiction (s) . Landlord will provide to tenant , or its agent , real estate tax bills and assessments due on the demised premises at least fifteen ( 15 ) days prior to the delinquency date . If any tax or assessment may, at the option of the taxpayer , be paid in installments , tenant may at its option elect to make such payments in installments. Provided , however , that for the first year of this term tenant will pay only the taxes levied against improvements upon the property and landlord will pay the taxes against the land for such one (1) year period. 9 . , INSURANCE : Tenant hereby covenants and agrees at all • times during the term hereof to obtain and maintain and keep in DOBSON, HOUSER & DOBSON . -3- P.O.SOX 5 RENTON. WA. 00007 TELEPHONE 255.0041 . b _ force for the mutual benefit of Tenant and landlord general public liability insurance in the amount of at least $ 1 , 000 , 000 . 00 combined single limit against claims for personal injury, death or property' damage occurring in, on or about the leased premises. Tenant will , at its own cost and expense, carry and maintain fire insurance with extended coverage endorsement for the benefit of landlord on all buildings erected upon the demised premises in an amount equal to at least eighty percent (80% ) of the full insurable value thereof , excluding foundation and excavating costs. As often as any such policy or policies shall expire or terminate , renewal or additional policies shall be procured by tenant in like manner and to like extent. Tenant may, at its option , bring its obligations to insure under this Article within the coverage of any so-called blanket policy or policies of insurance which it may now or hereafter carry by appropriate amendment, rider , endorsement or otherwise; provided however, that the interest of landlord shall thereby be as fully protected as they would be otherwise if this option to tenant to use blanket policies were not permitted. Copies of certificates of any such policies shall be delivered to landlord within thirty ( 30) days after procurement thereof . All such policies shall contain a clause or endorsement to the effect that it may not be terminated or materially amended except after ten (10) days written notice thereof to landlord. 10 . PUBLIC UTILITIES : Tenant agrees to pay all charges for water , gas , electricity or other public utilities incurred by tenant in connection with the demised premises. 11 . MECHANIC ' S LIEN : Tenant agrees to keep the premises free and clear , of any lien or encumbrance of any kind whatsoever created by tenant' s act or. omi.ssion. ' 12 . SUBLETTING AND ASSIGNMENT: Tenant shall have the right to assign or sublet the demised premises. However , in the event -4- DOBSON. HOUSER & DOBSON P.O.0OX 59 RENTON,WA. 90057 TELEPHONE 255.1041 said leased premises are sublet or assigned by tenant, then tenant shall not be relieved of any obligation to perform any of the terms and conditions of this lease unless landlord has consented to such subletting and/or assignment of this lease and such assignee has assumed in writing the payment of rent and performance of all other obligations of tenant hereunder , then inthat event tenant ' s liability hereunder shall cease and terminate. 13 . CONDEMNATION: If, without landlord 's fault, the use of the premises therefore, is prevented , limited or impaired in whole or in part, by any act or omission of any governmental authority , or becomes illegal , and such condition continues for thirty (30) days ; or if such operation or use is at any time materially impaired or affected by the closing, relocation , alteration or improvement of any street adjoining the premises; or if all or any part of the premises is condemned for public or quasi-public use, landlord may terminate this lease by giving tenant at least thirty ( 30) days written notice . In the event that landlord does not exercise its right to terminate this lease, the rent shall be reduced proportionately to the resulting loss of business. The proceeds of any condemnation award shall be divided between landlord and tenant as their respective interests may appear , but tenant shall in any event be entitled to the award of an equal amount to the unamortized cost of all improvements to the premises made by tenant and to the unamortized cost of its leasehold improvements and fixtures . 14 . BINDING ON SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS : The terms , conditions , and covenants of this lease shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of each of the parties hereto , their heirs , personal representatives, successors, or assigns and shall run with the land . 15 . HOLDING OVER: Any holding over after the expiration of DOBSON. HOUSER & DOBSON -5 P.O. OOX 69 RENTON.WA:Y5057 TELIPHONk 255-0441 . } the term of this lease with or without the consent of landlord shall be construed to be a `tenancy from month to month on the same terms and conditions herein specified so far as applicable, and at the last prevailing rental . 16. RIGHT TO PURCHASE: A . Tenant , or its assignee , shall have preemptive right during the term of this lease or any extension thereof to purchasethe demised premises upon the same terms and conditions as those of any bona fide offer received by and acceptable to landlord; then landlord , before making any sale or any agreement to sell , shall notify tenant in writing of the terms and conditions of such offer.. Tenant, within thirty (30) days after receipt of such notice , may exercise this preemptive right by written notice to landlord . Failure of tenant to exercise this preemptive right on one or more occasions shall not affect tenant ' s right to exercise it on any subsequent occasion . An14 sale or transfer of the demised premises, shall be expressly made subject to all of the terms ,, covenants and conditions of thi : lease. B . Commencing on the landlord ' s death and for twelve (12) calendar months thereafter, tenant or its assignees shall have the option of purchasing the premises with the improvements thereon for $200 , 000 . 00 adjusted by the Consumer Price Index , Pacific Cities, Seattle, All Urban Consumers, increase from date hereof tc date of closing with One Hundred Thousand and no/100 Dollar; ($100 , 000 . 00 ) as down payment and the balance bearing interest al the rate of 10% per annum shall be amortized over a 5 year perioc with no penalty for pre-payments . - C. Landlord owns the Defense Plant Corporation right-of-wa] to the east of the demised property and agrees with tenant that a: to the westerly one-half of said right of way, by area, measure( at right angle to SR 169 (Maple Valley Highway) he will not lease DOBSON. HOUSER a DOBSON —6— P.O.BOX 00 RENTON, WA.00007 TELIPHONt 255.0041 or sell the same without giving tenant the right to within thirty (30) days of written notice, to meet any bona fide offer received by and acceptable to landlord . 17 . SHORT FORM LEASE : A short form of this lease may be executed by the parties and recorded by tenant with the county recorder in King County, Washington. 18 . DEFAULT BY TENANT : If tenant shall be in default with respect to any obligations , covenants or agreements to be performed by it as set forth herein, and if such default is not cured by it within thirty ( 30 ) days after landlord has notified. tenant in writing of such default, landlord may re-enter upon said premises and exercise any right or remedy provided by law or this Lease. 19 . DEFAULT BY LANDLORD : Should landlord default in the payment of any obligation which results in a judgment against them upon which levy is sought against the demised premises, tenant shall have the right to pay or discharge any such obligation, but tenant shall not be obligated to do so .. Should tenant elect to pay or discharge any such obligation, landlord shall , upon demand , reimburse tenant in the full amount thereof , together with tenant ' s expenses incurred in connection therewith , including reasonable attorney' s fees and interest at the legal rate from the date of payment. tenant shall have the right to deduct from rents thereafter payable under this lease all amounts that have been paid in full . 20 . ATTORNEY ' S FEES : In the event that landlord or tenant commences an action to enforce any of the provisions of this lease, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney' s fees incurred in connection with such action . 21 . NOTICES : All notices and demands of any kind which landlord or tenant may require to be served upon the other , shall be given by depositing one copy of same in the United States mail , DOBSON. HOUSER -7- R DOBSON P.O.BOX 09 RENTON,WA.EE007 TELErHONE 255.0041 ' postage prepaid , certified mail addressed as follows : TO LANDLORD: JOHN W. DOBSON 6611 - 114th Ave . S.E. Renton, WA 98058 - TO TENANT : ACCORD, INC. 1911 Maple Valley Highway Renton, WA 98055 The place to which said notice shall be sent may be changed by written notice given as hereinabove provided . . 22 . REMOVAL OF SIGNS AND TRADEMARKS AT TERMINATION: While it is agreed that all buildings and improvements shall become the property of landlord , upon termination of the lease , tenant shall have the right to remove all trade fixtures and equipment , together with all signs bearing Taco Time label . Landlord grants to tenant the right, within thirty (30) days after termination to enter the premises and remove such fixtures, equipment and signs. L ORD: �,J 'i / Dated: . /"/V/ig . . 1 W. DOBSON TENANT: . ACCORD , INC. BY: .��;f..� �, Dated : //t7/ //fr President' 0 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING . ) at��i_ v On this `� day of F' ` ,. 1988 , before me , the undersigned , a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington , duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared JOHN W. DOBSON, tc me known to be the individual_ described in and who executed the foregoing instrument , and acknowledged that he signed and sealec the same as his free and voluntary act and deed , for the uses anc purposes therein mentioned . Lig Oi�1�CO,,,,q IVEN under my hand and official seal this day of � , 1988 . NOTAR P BLIC in and for the State . of Wa-hi gton residing at ?Ak-A-�+ . My co ' ..sion expires : Va - e- a8 . DOBSON, MOUSER ^8^ & DOBSON 0 . r.O.50X 00 RENTON, WA.00057 TELEPHONE 255.0041 1 _ t • CERTIFICATION OF NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS/SITE PLAN * * *FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY* * * ` PROJECT TITLE: —TALO 4 T) ME O4Fg IC,� B l l l l...pl'�1e- ( M M L.F ViLLEy 144 ) APPLICANT: Pau- J . CaS APPLICATION NUMBER: SA- 125-66 The following is a list of adjacent property owners and their addresses. A notification of the pending site plan application shall be sent to these individuals as prescribed by Renton City Code, Chapter 7 Section 38 of Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 relating to site plan approval. ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER •2bt+N (i , 9oSso &Co1I 1l4`l PL, 5, , SEc. (Co TLT' 23 9 c905Cp Lo-t- 1 01 70 Lort- Cp o) c5 LOT' 1 0200 Lc'T 8 024,'5 tsD-r 3 02I a Vt<9.1Jo k1 cvi. 1;5Q u u 51TE 9D 1 5, , co-Pin • Lo-t- 2 d 11,5 961cD 5 JArCo 6 L t t l'D 9f309 6' , Lp h LoT /j o 18© 12ENToN t WP 1805.5 Acl_ t c, c7, 4.-l•v sx-Jo i l 17 5,-5, (0 L,,-t- 4 co 18'5 ct8 0.5.5 Jo{-}.N K L U oo 12 tiro o 021 Vic , poi, I -7 gPeo iA T©V 1-1 NVLF \ILL ' l21GI-P<F0 ri WILL ( AMS 2l(o cv,1, CQ eT-, Lo-t- t7 coIs© -5I1rcJ GLIA. ciao 56 b \I 10 V K75. I ,- , C0 fir' Lc r lb o2CoCD Neon I t)J4 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON DEC 2 9 1988 n r Ir I7 \,1;. Fr' (' 1 ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER l'>.-&--t- 14`7 14o CcavAR ' .MM.'l? -tM. l 1'41LlP4i-o-t- ¶Uc -Lt`oI iZ25 ,, , ? , ���Tn i� t�.�A- C�rt� l 12)� *d- co-Jr' 6(8 c>55 G(k'c L`(t,) J . G E-FP‹gL,TC 1,1 Scroc Cl-P(L cCT t G�k v?, Lc5r. oo 25 A C-1 C Accty j plc, , 30'( i,rC" '�l J , `v-r., Low Co oo o 93055 -1-3 l r R 2c 1 321 7 ST, LIT' 7 ociif ` © -1 1U-146t CERTIFICATION I. PaUt.- A it 1 . hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and their addresses were taken from the records of the King County Assessor as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing at ii-r9-,in on the �/ day of ��—/-4_,, . /V -�� i�G� SIGNED: .J , c_....„Q 1 , CERTIFICATION OF MAILING ' 'I. - -A<=,_1(_. —hereby certify that notices of the public meeting on the subject site plan approval were rhailed on ero, r-k} 11987, to each listed adjacent property owner as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in nd for the State of Washington residing at irr)qi,c.( on the A1,(9 day.of(.1t--' /W j (1 • G1 ,(" / � f (L, _.yl bee-(t,i SIGNED: 5. ,_ IC. a-� -v-ti' 61/ • - ' FORM MB