Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA-06-095_Misclhlllli1Ha Corridor Program • Coogest;oo ReUef & B"' Rap ;d Tcaos;t Prnjects Springbr ook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report - DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON JUL 2 5 2006 RECEIVED May 2005 :;,: W••hlngton State T/# Department of TransportaUon HFf!,'.',f.\1 E 405 Corridor Program ... ··--.: ........ . ~ ~ Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 What is the I-405 Corridor Program? ............................................................................... 1 What is EEI? ..................................................................................................................... 1 How does this report support EEI? ................................................................................. .1 Where is the EEI Mitigation Site located? ...................................................................... .1 How was the wetland study for EEI conducted? .............................................................. 2 RESULTS ........................................................................................................................... 5 UNIT A ................................................................................................................................ 5 UNIT B ................................................................................................................................ 8 UNIT C .............................................................................................................................. 12 UNIT D .............................................................................................................................. 15 UNITE .............................................................................................................................. 17 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 18 APPENDIX A -WETLAND DELINEATION METHODS ..................................... A-1 APPENDIX 8-WETLAND DATA SHEETS ............................................................ 8-1 APPENDIX C -WETLAND PHOTOGRAPHS ........................................................ C-1 APPENDIX D -WETLAND SURVEY MAPS .......................................................... D-1 List of Tables TABLE 1. CRITERIA FOR WETLAND RATING CATEGORIES .......................... 4 TABLE 2. WETLAND SIZE, RATING, AND CLASSIFICATION FOR WETLANDS IN THE SPRINGBROOK CREEK WETLAND MITIGATION BANK ................................................................................................................................... 5 TABLE A-1. DEFINITIONS OF WETLAND PLANT INDICATOR CATEGORIES USED TO DETERMINE THE PRESENCE OF HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION ............................................................................................................. A-1 Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May2005 <tY + + ~~ List of Figures FIGURE I LOCATION OF MITIGATION SITES ....................................................... 3 FIGURE 2 UNIT A WETLAND DELINEATION ......................................................... 7 FIGURE 3 UNIT B WETLAND DELINEATION ......................................................... 9 FIGURE 4 UNIT C WETLAND DELINEATION ....................................................... 13 FIGURES UNIT D WETLAND DELINEATION ....................................................... 16 Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May2005 -::r.:_ ..... VI hpa1mwilalTiawpwta.6on ii Introduction What is the 1-405 Corridor Program? The 1-405 Corridor, from 1-5 in Tukwila to 1-5 in Lynnwood, needs improvement to relieve current and future traffic congestion. The 1-405 Corridor Program is a set of improvements to the 1-405 Corridor designed to address congestion on this important arterial. The proposed improvements will result in some environmental impacts, some of which will be addressed through a mitigation program called Early Environmental Investment (EEi). What is EEi? Early Environmental Investment develops mitigation in advance of project impacts. The EEi process will identify, rank, select, design, and permit environmental investment for improving aquatic resources, fish habitat, wetlands, water quantity, and floodplains. This advance selection and creation of mitigation will allow the resources longer to mature before actual project impacts are incurred, reducing the length of time that resource functions are affected. EEi is a cooperative effort, requiring information sharing and partnering among agencies with an interest in the 1-405 study area. How does this report support EEi? This report is an investigation of one mitigation site selected wider the EEI process. The report provides detailed baseline wetland information on the proposed Springbrook mitigation site. A separate mitigation report will be prepared to discuss details of the proposed mitigation activities at this site. Where is the EEi Mitigation Site located? The Proposed Springbrook Mitigation Site consists of five wiits (A through E, See Figure I). All five wiits are within the City of Renton, Washington: Unit A is located southwest of the intersection of SW 27th Street and Lind Avenue SW. It extends approximately 1,200 feet south from the intersection, and approximately 900 feet west to Springbrook Creek. Unit A is in Section 30, Township 23 North, Range 5 East (Willamette Meridian). Unit Bis located southeast of the intersection of SW 27th Street and Oakesdale Avenue SW (Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 East). It extends approximately 1,200 feet south from the intersection, and approximately 1,200 feet east to Springbrook Creek. Unit C is located west of Oakesdale Avenue SW, between SW 27th Street and SW 34th Street (Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 East). It extends west from Oakesdale Avenue SW to the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railroad right-of-way. Unit Dis located north of SW 43n1 Street, immediately east of the BNSF right-of-way (Section 36, Township 23 North, Range 4 East). It extends approximately 1,300 feet north of SW 43n1 Street, and approximately 350 feet east of the BNSF right-of-way. Unit Eis a triangular parcel located east of Oakesdale Avenue SW, approximately 400 feet south of SW 34th Avenue (Section 25, Township 23North, Range 4 East). Springbrook Creek forms the southeast bowidary of Unit E. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May2005 • ........ tu& ... .,, D p b; w:tel'TiTl•"'UO_,_ 1 How was the wetland study for EE/ conducted? The investigation included two steps. The first step was a review of existing documents such as soil surveys, aerial photographs, and other available documents. The second step was the field investigation, delineation, and classification of the wetlands observed on the units. Step I: Review of Existing Information Existing documents that were reviewed for this study included but were not limited to: • Soil Survey of King County Area, Washington (Snyder et al. 1973) • Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank Prospectus (Washington State Department of Transportation 2004) • National Wetland Inventory Web site (http://wetlandsfws.er.usgs.gov/wtlnds/launch.html) (USFWS 2004) These documents provide background information on the soils, hydrology, topography, land use, wetlands, streams, and wildlife habitat in the site vicinity. Step 2: Field Investigation Wetland delineations were made using the methods described in the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology] 1997) and the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual (U.S. Anny Corps of Engineers 1987). Areas were identified as wetlands if they displayed the necessary soils, plants, and hydrologic conditions. A detailed description of the field methods used in this study is provided in Appendix A of this report, and the wetland delineation data sheets are presented in Appendix B. Delineated wetlands were classified according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al. 1979). The City of Renton wetland rating system (Renton Municipal Code Title 4, Chapter 3, Section 4.3.050) was used to rate wetlands. Table I summarizes the wetland rating criteria utilized. A detailed analysis of wetland functions is not included in this report, but has been provided to regulatory agencies under separate cover (Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank Information Packet, [WSDOT 2004]). Updated information will be included in the wetland mitigation report to be prepared in 2005 . Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May2005 .................... .,, ... Ii llof ,, .... _ ..... ,.. 2 Legend N W+E s 0 500 1.000 1,500 2.000 Feel Everett FIGURE 1 Location of Mitigation Sites Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Welland Delineation Report I February 2005 Category Category I Category II Category Ill Table 1. Criteria for Wetland Rating Categories City of Renton• Category 1 wetlands are wetlands which meet one or more of the following criteria: (a) The presence of species listed by federal or state government as endangered or threatened, or the presence of essential habitat tor those species; and/or (b) Wetlands having forty percent (40%) to sixty percent (60%) permanent open water (in dispersed patches or otherwise) with two (2) or more vegetation classes; and/or (c) Wetlands equal to or greater than ten (10) acres in size and having three (3) or more vegetation classes, one of which is open water; and/or (d) The presence of plant associations of infrequent occurrence; or at the geographic limits of their occurrence; and/or (e) Wetlands assigned the Unique/Outstanding #1 rating In the current King County Wetlands Inventory 1991 or as thereafter amended. Category 2 wetlands are wetlands greater than two thousand two hundred (2,200) square feet which meet one or more of the following criteria: (a) Wetlands greater than two thousand two hundred (2,200) square feet that are not Category 1 or 3 wetlands; and/or (b) Wetlands that have heron rookeries or raptor nesting trees, but are not Category 1 wetlands; and/or (c) Wetlands of any size located at the headwaters of a watercourse, but are not Category 1 wetlands; and/or (d) Wetlands assigned the Significant #2 rating in the current King County Wetlands Inventory 1991 orasthereafteramended;and/or (e) Wetlands having minimum existing evidence of human-related physical alteration such as diking, ditching, or channelization. Category 3 wetlands are wetlands greater than five thousand (5,000) square feet which meet one or more of the following criteria: (a) Wetlands that are severely disturbed. Severely disturbed wetlands are wetlands which meet the following criteria: • Are characterized by hydrologic isolation, human-related hydrologic alterations such as diking, ditching, channelization and/or outlet modification; and • Have soils alterations such as the presence of fill, soil removal, and/or compaction of soils; and • May have altered vegetation. (b) Wetlands that are newly emerging. Newly emerging wetlands are: • Wetlands occurring on top of fill materials; and • Characterized by emergent vegetation, low plant species richness, and used minimally by wildlife. These wetlands are generally found in the areas such as the Green River Valley and Black River Drainage Basin. (c) All other wetlands not classified as Category 1 or 2 such as smaller, high quality wetlands . • City of Ren!Dn (Renton Municipal Code TIUe 4, Chapter 3, 43.050). Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May2005 ·--.. D p biml.rTr I 11:H 11 4 Results The initial wetland delineation was performed in October and November 2004. Eight wetlands were located in four (Units A, B, C, and D) of the five units. No wetlands were identified in Unit E. Wetland delineation data sheets are provided in Appendix B, and site photographs are in Appendix C. Table 2 summarizes the size, rating and classification of wetlands found within the study area, and Figures 2 through 5 show the wetland boundaries and data plot locations. Note that the second column of Table 2 shows the area of the delineated portion of the wetland (i.e., the portion on the parcel), followed by the estimated overall wetland size in parenthesis. Table 2. Wetland Size, Rating, and Classification for Wetlands In the Springbrook Creek Wetland Mitigation Site Wetland Delineated Wetland Ratln~ USFWS Classification• area In acres City of Renton {overall wetland size"! Unit A A-1 22.9 3 Forested, Scrub/shrub, Emergent 24 UnltB B-1 22.3 3 Forested, Emergent 22.3 8-2 10.0 3 Forested. Emergent 10.0 B-3 0.3 3 Forested, Emergent 0.3 UnltC C-1 21.2 2 Forested, Scrub/shrub 33.9 C-2 5.8 3 Forested. Emergent 48.5 C-3 0.9 3 Forested 48.5 UnltD 0-1 5.6 2 Forested, Scrub/shrub, Emergent 6.7 Overall wetlands size is estimated based on aerial photograph interpretation. Area of delineated poltions of Iha wetlands is based on instrument survey (Huitt Zollars, 2004-2005). b Wetland ratings are based on Renton Municipal Code, Tille 4 Chapler 3. All ratings shown in this table are preliminary and have not been reviewed by the City of Renton or other regulatory agencies. COwefdin et al. (1979). All wetlands are palustrine. 4 Wetlands C-1, C-2, and C-3 are part of the same wetland complex. Ofh;Jte wetlands to the north were calculated with Wetland C-1, and those to the south of the property were calaJlated with C-2/C-3. UnitA Field investigations were performed by project biologists at Unit A on October 20, 2004, and additional data were collected on October 21 and 28, 2004. One wetland (A-1) was delineated within the unit. A summary of the findings at Unit A are presented below. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May2005 ·-1111 ........ -D p •wal_,Tr.,w-,o-- 5 WetlandA-1 Palnstrine forested, scrnb/shrnb, and emergent Category3 22.9 acres in Unit A/24 acres overall Wetland A-1 is riverine wetland located in a low lying area between adjacent roads, developed areas elevated by fill material, and the maintained berm along Springbrook Creek. Wetland A-1 is approximately 24 acres in size, and includes palustrine forested, scrub/shrub, and emergent communities (Cowardin et al. 1979). The forested areas comprise a fringe along the northern, southern, and western edges of Wetland A-1, although portions of the forested component extend into the middle of the unit. The scrub/shrub communities occur as smaller (approximately 0.2 to 1.5 acre) areas scattered throughout the forested and emergent communities. The emergent community covers the eastern V, of Unit A. Vegetation in the forested areas includes red alder (A/nus rubra) and black cottonwood (Populus balsamifera) in the canopy. These trees are relatively low (generally less than 75 feet tall), with diameters at breast height (dbh) up to approximately 24 inches. The understory includes Pacific willow (Salix lucida var. lasiandra) and Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus). Reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea) is the dominant herbaceous species and occupies the emergent areas. Soils in Wetland A-1 are mapped as Snohomish silt loam, Woodinville silt loam, and Puget silty clay loam (Snyder et al. 1973). The soils observed in wetland test pits were generally very dark grayish brown (lOYR 3/2) silty clay or silty clay loam. Fine redoxymorphic features were common in most areas. Wetland A-I is separated from Springbrook Creek by a maintained berm located approximately 20 feet above the water level. Two small ditches, referred to herein as the northern and southern ditches, traverse Wetland A-1 from east to west. The northern ditch crosses the middle of the unit beginning near Lind Avenue SW and extending to the eastern foot of the berm along Springbrook Creek. A culvert carries it under the berm. This ditch is approximately 6 feet wide and IO inches deep, and reed caoarygrass lines the channel and dominates the substrate. The southern ditch is located just north of the south property boundary. The ditch begins at a culvert under Lind Avenue SW, and flows west to Springbrook Creek, where it passes through the berm. The southern ditch is approximately 10 to 15 feet wide, and appears to consist of a series ofloosely connected areas of shallow inundation. The banks are vegetated with alder, cottonwood, and willows, which provide shade and contribute to organic material. A culvert carries water from the south directly into Wetland A-1. Wetland hydrology in Wetland A-I appears to derive from elevated groundwater from Springbrook Creek and storm water flows entering the wetland from culverts to the east and south. Areas of saturated soils and shallow inundation were observed during the field investigations. Fill berms adjacent to the sidewalks along Lind Avenue SW and SW 27th Street extend down to the wetland edge. These areas are dominated by dense thickets of Himalayan blackberry and likely consist of fill material placed when these roads were constructed. With the exception of a few undeveloped areas, the majority of the parcels surrounding Wetland A-I are developed (see Figures I and 2). An undeveloped lot, potentially consisting of a wetland, is located north Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineatlon Report May2005 ............... D p bttallofTnl p I II 6 Figure 2 f~~~~ .... ~~*"~~ Unit A Wetland Delineation C) Surveyed Wetland ,,.,.,.,.....,.,,......,...."..:J~'" 0 Interpreted (off-s it e ) Wetl a nd Data Plot w+e O 100 20~ee l s of SW 27th Street and east of Springbrook Creek. Due to the presence of the street, this area is not directly connected to Wetland A-1, although it likely was in the past. The parcel south of Wetland A-1 along Lind Avenue SW includes a large building and parking areas. A small stormwater treatment feature, approximately 50 feet wide, is associated with this development and is located between the parking areas and Wetland A-1. Until recently, the parcel to the southwest of Unit A contained maintained pasture grass. This pasture is currently being graded for development. The western boundary of Unit A includes the channelized portion of Springbrook Creek. A large wetland complex is located immediately west of Springbrook Creek (see Unit B description). In summary, Wetland A-1 is a large system comprised of multiple vegetation types that contribute to relatively high function. However, its buffers are narrow and disturbed, limited in size and function by surrounding land uses. Although Wetland A-1 is surrounded on three sides by development, a berm adjacent to Springbrook Creek forms the fourth side and is relatively undisturbed. Springbrook Creek provides a hydrologic connection to other habitats upstream and downstream of the site, as well as areas along the BNSF right-of-way and the Green River. UnitB Project biologists delineated three wetlands (B-1, B-2, and B-3) in Unit Bon October 19, 2004. Additional data were collected on October 20, 2004. A summary of the wetland investigations is provided below. WetlandB-1 Palustrine forested and emergent Category3 22.3 acres in Unit B/22.3 acres overall Wetland B-1 is a depressional wetland approximately 22.3 acres in size and includes palustrine forested and emergent communities (Cowardin et al. 1979). The forested areas comprise a fringe along SW 27th Street and Oakesdale Avenue SW, and also occupy the southern third of the wetland (See Figures 1 and 3). The emergent community occupies the northeastern third of the wetland. Vegetation in the forested areas includes red alder and black cottonwood in the canopy, with an understory of Pacific willow, Scouler's willow (Salix scouleriana), Himalayan blackberry, and red osier dogwood (Cornus sericea). Herbaceous species in the forested areas include bittersweet nightshade (Solanum dulcamara), scouring rush (Equisetum hymale), English ivy (Hedera helix), and hedge bindweed (Convulvulus sepium). Trees in Wetland B-1 are relatively short (the tallest are approximately 75 feet), with diameters at breast height (dbh) up to approximately 24 inches. Emergent portions of Wetland B-1 are dominated by reed canarygrass, although yellowflag iris, common cattail (Typha latifolia), creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens), waterpepper (Polygonum hydropiper), and mild waterpepper (Polygonum hydropiperoides var. hydropiperoides) are locally dominant. Soils in Wetland B-1 are mapped as Woodinville silt loam (Snyder et al. 1973). The observed soils were generally dark to very dark grayish brown (IOYR 4/2 to IOYR 3/2) silty loam to silty clay loam. Fine redoxymorphic features were common in most of the sample plots. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May2005 Aw•••• ...., •. ; ....... ., ......... -- 8 ~ Figure 3 Unit B Wetland Delineation C) Parcel C:S) Surveyed Wetland Data Plot 0 1W W O ~ ~ cn LU!.:!:::~.:.:r....::.i.!!'l.ll!!JE::;.J...!_~..!..._----..;;.....;!;..::.;__.!..___..:.....__!._,_-=-.::.:..----i-------- Wetland B-1 is located in a depression bordered by SW 27"' Street to the north, Oakesdale Avenue SW to the west, developed areas (fill) to the south, and the Oakesdale Avenue SW Mitigation Site to the east. Topography within the wetland is quite flat, with a few micro-depressions that trap water. Wetland B-1 is separated from Springbrook Creek by a berm (the Oakesdale Avenue Mitigation Site) and by Wetland B-2. A culvert appears to carry water into Wetland B-1 from the west under Oakesdale A venue SW; however, no flow was observed during the field investigation and there was no evidence of a channel. Shallow areas of inundation were found along the eastern side of Wetland B-1 near the Oakesdale Avenue SW Mitigation Site. Water appears to directly enter Wetland B-1 as precipitation, and via elevated groundwater levels. ht addition to Wetland B-1, two other wetlands (B-2 to the east and B-3 to the north) are located in Unit B. Two vacant parcels (a Boeing site and Unit C) are located to the west of Wetland B-1 on the opposite side of Oakesdale Avenue SW. Southwest 27"' Street is located to the north of Wetland B-1, and the properties to the north of the road are occupied by commercial buildings. A newly built strip-mall is located south of Wetland B-1. Vegetation along the road edges is dominated by domestic grasses and non-native forbs. Himalayan blackberry is prevalent along edges and in disturbed areas. Wetland B-1 is a relatively large wetland with multiple habitat types. These habitats are fragmented by roads and development, and the natural vegetation has been altered significantly. Buffers are narrow and disturbed, except on the east. WetlandB-2 Palustrlne forested and emergent Category3 10 acres in Unit B/10 acres overall Wetland B-2 is a riparian wetland 10 acres in size, and includes palustrine forested and emergent communities (Cowardin et al. 1979). The forested area dominates the majority of the wetland, and the emergent areas are located in the northeast and northwest comers of the wetland (see Figures 1 and 3). Vegetation in the forested area is dominated by Pacific willow, although Oregon ash (Fraxinus latifo/ia) is present in the northern portion of the forested area. Red osier dogwood is the dominant understory plant, although Himalayan blackberry is also present. Herbaceous species in the forest include reed canarygrass, bittersweet nightshade, and hedge bindweed. Stinging nettle (Urtica dioica) and yellowflag iris (Iris pseudacorus) are also common in some areas. Emergent portions of Wetland B-2 are dominated by reed canarygrass, but common cattail, and mild waterpepper are also present in areas with seasonal ponding. Soils in Wetland B-2 are mapped as Woodinville silt loam (Snyder et al. 1973). The soils observed in Wetland B-2 are similar to those found in Wetland B-1 (dark to very dark grayish brown silty loam to silty clay loam with fine redoxymorphic features). Wetland B-2 is located in a depression bordered by SW 27th Street to the north, developed areas (fill) to the south, and berms to the east and west. The topography of Wetland B-2 is relatively flat, with a few micro-depressions that trap and hold water. Shallow inundated areas were found in the northern third of Wetland B-2. Wetland B-2 is separated from Springbrook Creek by a maintained berm. A small ditch begins in the forested area on the northern third of Wetland B-2. The ditch extends through the berm to Springbrook Creek. This ditch effectively drains the northern portion of the wetland. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May2005 ---• D C tlwlof1"1'"L_wp __ 10 A culvert on Springbrook Creek upstream of Unit B has historically constricted flow of the stream, resulting in flooding of adjacent areas. To alleviate this and associated upstream flooding north of SW 2711, Street, the culvert under the road was recently replaced (1999). This replacement subsequently removed the constriction of flow through Springbrook Creek. Since this constriction has been removed, the impact of Springbrook Creek on the hydroperiod of Wetland B-2 is unclear. The remaining buffers of Wetland B-2 are somewhat wider than those of Wetland B-1. The Oakesdale Avenue SW Mitigation Site and Wetland B-1 are located to the west of Wetland B-2, and Springbrook Creek and Wetland A-1 are located to the east. The northern edge of Wetland B-2 extends to the fill slope of SW 2711, Street, which is dominated by domestic grasses, non-native forbs, and Himalayan blackberry. New construction is located to the south of the wetland, and associated parking surfaces extend nearly to the wetland edge. Wetland B-2 is a relatively large wetland with multiple habitat types. The system provides a connection between Wetlands B-1 and A-1 as well as to other habitats along Springbrook Creek, the BNSF Railroad, and the Green River. WetlandB-3 Palnstrine forested Category3 0.3 acre In Unit B/0.3 acre overall Wetland B-3 is a relatively small (0.3 acre) palustrine forested wetland (Cowardin et al. 1979). It is located in a swale between Wetland B-1 and SW 27th Street, and extends west to Oakesdale Avenue SW (see Figures I and 3). Vegetation in Wetland B-3 is similar to the forested portions of Wetland B-1 and includes a canopy of red alder and Pacific willow, with red osier dogwood in the understory. Himalayan blackberry is also present, particularly in the eastern half of the wetland, and on the road prism of SW 2711, Street. Herbaceous vegetation in Wetland B-3 is sparse, although scattered reed canarygrass and common horsetail (Equisetum arvense) are present. Soils in Wetland B-3 are mapped as Woodinville silt loam (Snyder et al. 1973), and the observed soils are similar to those found in Wetland B-1, although some gravels are present. Wetland B-3 is separated from Wetland B-1 by a berm. It is unclear whether Wetland B-3 was excavated and the berm constructed from the excavated material, or if the berm was constructed from fill material from some other location. Water in Wetland B-3 appears to be provided by runoff from SW 2711, Street. Groundwater may also play a role in the hydrology of this wetland. The buffers for Wetland B-3 include Wetland B-1 to the south and the fill slopes for Oakesdale Avenue SW and SW 2711, Street to the west and north. The eastern buffer is predominantly Himalayan blackberry, and extends along SW 2711, Street to the Oakesdale Avenue SW Mitigation Site. The northern and western buffers are narrow (less than 20 feet wide), limited by the presence of the roadways. Wetland B-3 is small and subject to frequent disturbance. Trash is common in the wetland and its buffers. As a result, it provides little habitat for wildlife, and likely has low relative value . Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May2005 ... ,,, ..... V n s •uw::tof;;;Twz""wo'"'o .. ,1 ... , oo, 11 UnitC Project biologists delineated three wetlands (C-1, C-2, and C-3) in Unit Con October 22, 26, 27, and 28, 2004 and on November 2, 3, and 5, 2004. A summary of these wetlands is provided below. WetlandC-1 Palnstrine forested and scmb/sbrnb Category2 21.2 acres in Unit C/33.9 acres overall Wetland C-1 is a palustrine forested-scrub/shrub depressional wetland (Cowardin et al. 1979) approximately 33.9 acres in size, 21.2 acres of which are within Unit C. Wetland C-1 is located along the north and east sides of Unit C, and extends northward onto Boeing property (see Figures I and 4). Pockets of scrub-shrub communities occur within the larger forested community. Most of these shrub communities have hydric soils and are dominated by wetland vegetation, although there are several small areas of fill material within the larger wetland matrix vegetated by monocultures of Himalayan blackberry. Vegetation in Wetland C-1 includes a canopy ofred alder and black cottonwood, with an understory of Sitka willow (Salix sitchensis), red osier dogwood, and hardback (Spiraea douglasii). Herbaceous species in the forested areas include a mixture of creeping buttercup, bittersweet nightshade, and reed canarygrass. Shrub communities in Wetland C-1 include Pacific willow, red osier dogwood, hardback, and Himalayan blackberry. Soils in Wetland C-1 are mapped as a mixture of Woodinville silt loam and Puyallup fine sandy loam (Snyder et al. 1973). The soils observed in wetland test pits were generally dark grayish brown (IOYR 4/2) silt loam with fine redoxymorphic features. Previous studies (Parametrix 2002) indicate that some portions of Wetland C-1 maybe comprised of fill material. Wetland C-1 appears to receive water from precipitation and from elevated groundwater levels. A ditch crosses Wetland C-1 near the northern property line, but does not appear to provide water to Wetland C-1. Rather, this ditch appears to have been constructed to convey water away from Wetland C-1 and under Oakesdale Avenue SW through a culvert north of Unit C. A shallow swale with no defined channel does cross the central portion of Wetland C-1, traveling from north to south. This swale appears to be a remnant of the original drainage shown on the soil survey (Snyder et al. 1973). Wetland C-1 extends east to the edge of the fill prism of Oakesdale Avenue SW. The road slope is dominated by a dense thicket of Himalayan blackberry adjacent to the wetland. Closer to Oakesdale Avenue SW, the right-of-way consists of mowed grasses with disturbance-tolerant forbs (lance-leaf plantain [Plantago lanceolata], tansy [Tanacetum vulgare], teasel [Dipsacus sylvestris], and thistle [Cirsium vulgare]). North of Unit C, Wetland C-1 includes emergent areas dominated by reed canarygrass and disturbed upland meadows. The area immediately west of Wetland C-1 is primarily Himalayan blackberry, grading into the emergent portion of Wetland C-2. The areas to the south of Wetland C-1 include dense thickets of Himalayan blackberry and Scot's broom (Cytisus scoparius), and a surrounding meadow with mixed grasses (bentgrasses [Agrostis spp.], orchard grass [Dactylis glomerata], and ryegrass [Lolium sp.]) and disturbance-tolerant forbs (lance-leaf plantain, St. Johnswort [Hypericum pe,foratum], tansy, and thistle). Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May2005 Gr., , •. ;:r ... _,_,, .. 12 w z+~ "O s! :: C o _ C1l :;:::: C: Q) 0 ~ ;: -C'CI "O Q) G) ~ C: C CJ) C1l ~ Q) :;:::: Q) 0 C ~ ........ ~ "C "O C: "O Q) Q) -C'CI Q) ;:; a5 >. .... Q) a. G) ~ ~ .... == Q) C1l ::, -(.) a.. (/) .5 0 Wetland C-1 is a relatively large wetland with multiple habitat types. Songbirds and raptors Oikely red- tailed hawks) were observed in the wetland and in the adjacent uplands, and a raptor nest was observed. Coyotes were also observed in this area. Connectivity to other habitats is very good, making this a desirable location for restoration. WetlandC-2 Palustrine forested and emergent Category3 5.8 acres in Unit C/48.S acres overall Wetland C-2 is a palustrine forested and emergent depressional wetland (Cowardin et al. 1979) approximately 48.5 acres in size; 5.8 acres of Wetland C-2 are within Unit C. The forested area occupies the eastern and southern portion of wetland C-2, and the emergent community occurs in the west alongside the BNSF Railroad right-of-way (Figures I and 4). Vegetation in the forested area is dominated by black cottonwood and Pacific willow with an understory ofScouler's willow, red osier dogwood, and Himalayan blackberry. The emergent community is dominated by reed canarygrass. Soils in Wetland C-2 are mapped as Woodinville silt loam and Puget silty clay loam (Snyder et al. 1973). The soils observed in Wetland C-2 are dark grayish brown silt loam with medium-sized redoxymorphic features. As noted above, portions of Wetland C-2 may include fill soils (Parametrix 2002). Topography in Wetland C-2 is relatively flat and evenly sloped, although hummocks are present in emergent areas. Wetland C-2 appears to receive water from precipitation and from elevated groundwater levels. A north-south running ditch divides the forested portions of Wetland C-2 from the emergent communities. This ditch continues north beyond the wetland boundary before turning east and entering Wetland C-1. As noted in the description of Wetland C-1, the ditch appears to have been constructed to convey water away from Unit C. Wetland C-2 extends to the edge of the BNSF right-of-way on the west. The vegetation to the north of Wetland C-2 is dominated by Himalayan blackberry. A large, disturbed upland is located to the east of Wetland C-2 (see description of upland west of Wetland C-1). Wetland C-2 extends south beyond the boundary of Unit C with similar vegetation communities throughout the system. Wetland C-2 is a large wetland with multiple habitat types. Songbirds, raptors, and coyotes were observed in Wetland C-2 and in the adjacent uplands. As noted for Wetland C-1, connectivity to other habitats is very good, making this a desirable location for restoration. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May2005 . ............. ..... • • • lliiMilofT<Tl& __ _. ... c:. 14 WetlandC-3 Palustrine forested Category3 0.9 acres in Unit C/48.5 acres overall Wetland C-3 is a palustrine forested depressional wetland (Cowardin et al. 1979). It is connected to Wetland C-2, and the wetland complex extends offsite to the south. The total size is approximately 48.5 acres (including Wetland C-2), but the portion of Wetland C-3 in Unit C is approximately 0.9 acre. It is located in the southern-central portion of Unit C, north of the BNSF warehouse on Oakesdale Avenue SW (Figures I and 4). Wetland C-3 extends offsite to the south and west, and appears to be connected to Wetland C-2 beyond the Unit boundary. Wetland C-3 has a canopy of black cottonwood and Pacific willow, with an understory of red osier dogwood, Himalayan blackberry, and Sitka willow. Herbaceous vegetation is largely absent. Soils in Wetland C-3 are mapped as Puyallup fine sandy loam (Snyder et al. 1973). The observed soils are dark grayish brown gravelly loam with fine redoxymorphic features. Soils in Wetland C-3 may include fill as noted in Wetlands C-1 and C-2 (Parametrix 2002). A small drainage formerly traversed Unit C, but it appears to have been buried by subsequent activity on the site. This buried drainage may still provide subsurface water to Wetland C-3. Other potential sources of water include direct precipitation and elevated groundwater levels. A large disturbed upland is located to the north and west of Wetland C-3. This upland is several feet higher than the surrounding wetland and appears to be comprised primarily of fill material. Vegetation in the upland is dominated by invasive species including Himalayan blackberry and Scot's broom, with mixed grasses and disturbance-tolerant forbs (see description of southern buffer for Wetland C-1). A disturbed emergent wetland community (primarily bentgrass sp.) is located to the south of Wetland C-3, and a commercial/light industrial site with associated parking is located to the southeast of Wetland C-3. Although Wetland C-3 is small and relatively disturbed, it provides a valuable pocket of habitat bordered on one side by an industrial area. Wetland C-3 is connected to other relatively large wetlands and uplands to the north and south, and the nearby BNSF right-of-way provides a linear corridor connecting Wetland C-3 to other habitats. UnitD Project biologists visited Unit D on October 21, 2004, and delineated one wetland (D-1 ). A summary of Wetland D-1 is provided below. Wetland D-1 Palustrine forested, scrub/shrnb, and emergent Category2 5.6 acres in Unit D/6.7 acres overall Wetland D-1 is approximately 6.7 acres in size; 5.6 acres of the wetland are in Unit D (Figures 1 and 5). The wetland includes palustrine forested, scrub/shrub, and emergent communities (Cowardin et al. 1979). The forested areas are located primarily along the BNSF right-of-way and to the south. Portions of the forested wetland extend north off of the site. The emergent community covers the eastern and northern portions ofWetland D-1. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May2005 -=---.,, D1, biwal .. Tr....-- 15 Figure 5 Unit D Wetland Delineation Parcel Surveyed Wetland Interpreted (off-site) Wetland Data Plot 200 Feet Vegetation in the forested areas includes red alder and black cottonwood; Pacific willow and Oregon ash in the canopy; and salmonbeny (Rubus spectabilis), red osier dogwood, and hardback in the understory. Reed canary grass, lady fem (Athyrium fl/ix femina ), and creeping buttercup are the dominant herbaceous species. Vegetation in the emergent community is dominated by reed canarygrass, common cattail, and mild waterpepper. Wetland D-1 is situated in a depression with relatively steep slopes to the east and west. Topography within Wetland D-1 is flat, with a few micro-depressions and many hummocks in the emergent area. Soils in Wetland D-1 are mapped as Snohomish silt loam and Puget silty clay loam (Snyder et al. 1973). The soils observed in test pits were generally grayish brown (IOYR 5/2) silty clay to silty clay loam. Fine redoxymorphic features were common in most areas. Water appears to enter Wetland D- I directly as precipitation, and via elevated groundwater. Several areas of bare earth with cracked soil were observed in the emergent areas. Wetland D-1 occupies the majority of Unit D. The southern third of the unit includes an existing mitigation site, which is bordered on the north by a dense thicket of Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus). East of Wetland D-1, a narrow, mowed area with planted shrub (primarily oceanspray [Holodiscus discolor] and red osier dogwood) separates the wetland from adjacent parking and commercial buildings. The southeastern buffer is dominated by black cottonwood with a dense understory of Himalayan blackberry. On the west, Wetland D-1 extends to the edge of the maintained BNSF right-of-way. A railroad spur and several undeveloped parcels owned by the railroad complete the northern buffer. Wetland D-1 is a relatively large wetland with multiple vegetation types. The buffers are disturbed, particularly those to the east and west; however, those to the north and south contain relatively extensive areas of open space. The BNSF right-of-way provides connections to other habitats to the north and south. UnitE Unit E is a triangular parcel located east of Oakesdale Avenue SW, approximately 400 feet south of SW 34lh Avenue in Renton (Section 25, T23N, R4E). No wetlands were identified on this parcel (Figure!). The flooded fringe of Springbrook Creek does conform to the wetland definition, however, and is discussed below. Unit E was filled within the last 20 years. The site is roughly 15 feet higher in elevation than the adjacent creek. Unit E is vegetated with ruderal species and colonizing trees and shrubs. Along the stream banks, red alder trees have established a well-developed canopy over most of this section of stream. The understory is dominated by reed canarygrass and Himalayan blackberry. The flooded fringe of the creek is completely dominated by reed canarygrass. Soils are composed of gravelly sandy loam that was placed as fill, and silt loam may represent historic floodplain soils. Hydrology is primarily maintained by the surface water of Springbrook Creek. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May2005 ....._...._ .... '1i D p ta laf'TH U$ taltGII 17 References Cooke, S.S. 1997. A Field Guide to the Common Wetland Plants of Western Washington and Northwest Oregon. Seattle Audubon Society, Seattle, Washington. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Ecology (Washington State Department of Ecology). 1997. Washington State wetland identification and delineation manual, Publication #96-94. Olympia, Washington. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y- 87-1, Environmental Laboratory, Department of the Anny, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Greytag Macbeth Corporation. 1994. Munsell soil color charts. Hitchcock, C.L. and A. Cronquist. 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington. NRCS (Natural Resource Conservation Service). 2003. Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States. U. S. Department of Agriculture in cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils. Parametrix, Inc. 2002. Wetland Mitigation Banking Plan for the City of Renton. Prepared by Parametrix, Inc. for the City of Renton. Renton, Washington. Pojar, J. and A. MacKinnon. 1994. Plants of the Pacific Northwest Coast. Lone Pine Publishing, Redmond, Washington. Reed, P.B., Jr. 1997. Revision of the national list of plant species that occur in wetlands. U.S. Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. Washington, D.C. Renton, City of. 2004. Renton Municipal Code, Title 4, Chapter 3, Section 4 (available at http://www.mrsc.org/codes.aspx). City of Renton, Washington. Snyder, D.E., P.S. Gale, and R.F. Russell. 1973. Soil Survey of King County Area, Washington. USDA Soil Conservation Service, In Cooperation with Washington Agricultural Experimental Station. United States Government Printing Office, Washington D.C. USDA, NRCS (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service). 2004. The PLANTS Database, Version 3.5 (http://plants.usda.gov). National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70874-4490 USA. USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 2004. National Wetland Inventory, Renton, Washington Quadrangle. http://wetlandsfws.er.usgs.gov/wtlnds/launch.html. U.S. Department of Fish and Wildlife Service. Portland, Oregon. WSDOT (Washington State Department of Transportation). 2004. Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank Prospectus. Prepared for WSDOT. Olympia, Washington. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May2005 -w:~~ .. u. 18 WSDOT (Washington State Department of Transportation). 2004. Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank Information Packet. Prepared for WSDOT. Olympia, Washington. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May2005 -:,:w .... ....-a111t11 ...... ••• b.••• al Traaaportadctll 19 Appendix A -Wetland Delineation Methods Wetlands are defined as areas saturated or inundated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and which under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. The methods used to delineate the on-site wetlands conform to methods in Washington State Wetland Identification and Delineation Manual (Ecology 1997). All delineated wetlands were instrument-surveyed and mapped on project base maps. Field data sheets for wetlands are provided in Appendix B. To be considered a wetland, an area must have hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology. HDR Engineering, me. staff collected data on these parameters in areas representative of typical site conditions. Staff collected additional data in associated uplands as needed to confrrm wetland and stream boundaries. The wetland boundaries were delineated with numbered, bright pink flagging. Boundaries were numbered in the order in which they were encountered in the field, and numbering does not necessarily reflect geographic location. Vegetation The dominant plants and their wetland indicator status were evaluated to determine if the vegetation was hydrophytic. Hydrophytic vegetation is defined as vegetation adapted to wetland conditions. To meet the hydrophytic vegetation criterion, more than 50 percent of the dominant plants must be Facultative, Facultative Wetland, or Obligate, based on the wetland indicator category assigned to each plant species by USFWS (Reed 1997). Table A-1 lists the definitions of the indicator categories. Table A-1. Definitions of Wetland Plant Indicator Categories used to Determine the Presence of Hydrophytic Vegetation Wetland Indicator Category Obligate Wetland Plants Facultative WeUand Plants F acultative Plants Facultative Upland Plants Upland Plants Sou"'8: -d (1997). Symbol OBL FACW FAC FACU UPL Definition Plants that almost always(> 99% of the time) occur in wetlands, but which may rarely(< 1% of the time) occur in non-wetlands. Plants that often (67 to 99% of the time) occur In wetlands, but sometimes (1 to 33% of the time) occur in non-wetlands. Plants with a similar likelihood (34 to 66% of the time) of occurring in both wetlands and non- wetlands. Plants that sometimes (1 to 33% of the time) occur in wetlands, but occur more often (67 to 99% of the time) in non-wetlands. Plants that rarely ( < 1 % of the time) occur In wetlands, and almost always (> 99% of the time) occur in non-wetlands. Project biologists used A Field Guide to the Common Wetland Plants of Western Washington and Northwest Oregon (Cooke 1997) and Plants of the Pacific Northwest (Pojar and MacKinnon 1994) as field references to assist with plant identification. Scientific and common plant names follow currently accepted nomenclature. Most names are consistent with Flora of the Pacific Northwest (Hitchcock and Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May2005 -;;z;;w-- .-,, Departin•nt of Tra."''""'"""'"""loo•• A-1 Cronquist 1973) and the PLANTS Database (USDA 2004). During the field investigation, staff observed and recorded the dominant plant species on data sheets for each data plot (Appendix B). Soils Generally, an area must contain hydric soils to be a wetland. Hydric soil forms when soils are saturated, flooded, or ponded long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part (12 inches). Biological activities in saturated soil result in reduced oxygen concentrations and organisms turn to anaerobic processes for metabolism. Over time, anaerobic biological processes result in certain soil color patterns, which are used as indicators ofhydric soil. Typically, low-chroma colors are formed in the soil matrix, and bright-colored redoximorphic features form within the matrix. Other important hydric soil indicators include organic matter accumulations in the surface horizon, reduced sulfur odors, and organic matter staining in the subsurface (NRCS 2003). Project staff examined soils by excavating sample pits to a depth of 16 inches or more to observe soil profiles, colors, and textures. Munsell color charts (Greylag Macbeth 1994) were used to describe soil colors. Hydrology Project staff examined the area for evidence of hydrology. Wetland hydrology criteria were considered to be satisfied if it appeared that the soil was seasonally inundated or saturated to the surface for a consecutive number of days greater than or equal to 12.5 percent of the growing season. The growing for the area was determined based on the period in which temperatures are above 28 degrees F five years out often (Washington State Department of Ecology 1997). Temperature data from the two nearest stations (Kent and SeaTac, Washington) was reviewed. The Kent station was the more conservative of the two, and lists the growing season as extending from March 8 until November 11 (http://www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/). Primary indicators of hydrology include surface inundation and saturated soils. Secondary indicators of hydrology include drainage patterns, watermarks on vegetation, water-stained leaves, and oxidized root channels. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May2005 A-2 Appendix B -Wetland Data Sheets Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May2005 -..,..w_.._ ..,,,, D•partment of Tr..,~ .. -•...,bot-lon B-1 SOILS Map Unit Name r.....oJ.1 .,..,;lk., 5,' l "< loi,,.,M. (Series & Phase) Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors (inches) · (Munsell (Munsell moist) moist) 0-~ A-, lOyr ?/z.. ---- i-~'\ tr 'L, {D 1r ~/'-ID,r fJ/0 l~-\~\-p 1D~v5/Z 10'ft (/,b Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) --Histosol __ Histic Epipedon --Sulfidic Odor __ Aquic Moisture Regime __ Reducing Conditions GI eyed or Low-Chroma (=I) matrix Hydric soils present? ( ye~ no Rationale for decision/Remar~ LocJ c.,h...-v>'n."' .,. A IMO t\l <. ~ ~~--\1,L Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ~-no Hydric soils present? no Wetland hvdroloo-v present? :;{e;7 no Rationale/Remarks: - 5 :1 t "~eJ, " I I ) c t -1 l V ; " ,, • J NOTES: ~'o· i \ , tr\• •1 Db i.Je,-+ Drainage Class P0ocly -Rea• ,,1 Field observations confirm Yes No e? Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil size & contrast structure, etc. profile (match descriQtion) . 5,L-- f}~ rn: ""'1' i ... f.f ... v S: L-roor~fl'1 A'VI...,... -• ' £'.:~ S••A7 \ 00."" p;,,._J_ I t't'lt--vi'f/ J,; ~+:"' V L Matrix chroma :;; 2 with mottles __ Mg or Fe Concretions __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Other (explain in remarks) 6V ;'tr.J; OY\ @no Is the sampling point within a wetland? .;--\.., ,,-h,;'<. 'i vJ ;-r L,· 1,,. ~ .., c,t{i,. ,4\ Revised 4/97 DAT A FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) Project/Site: . $. pr;" j le rook / h "•,-+ 9 Applicant/owner: Date: 1~/i.1/at County: K.:..,) State: ""* Investigator(s): '?_.\-'\n,ku', fYl•'L t\-«t-e r-.. Sff/R: 1! ti. ,-z.-,,µ. ~~ €' Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? · (jy no Community ID:, " \.J<,tl•~.\ yes~ '{)-I Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? Transect ID: Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes no Plot ID: 1.s {. j,,./1.. . c:>-1:-) Explanation of atvoical or oroblem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = sluub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator ~l'\~'\l'll.."'l 1,1... {lf'-"l \-t fD>f ~,.._.. A-11-11,,1 (<Abr"' T to*-[Cl..--C- t~\,c, ,:;n,,,i.J '\; fa- s 1s--* ~+ fh,/ff; ! .,..y ... ;,A;'"""te"'-* "SD 1' I~ \,.I_ r .5 \ t) * -fo...c.-v 5 I Z) _:i.. -(;L__ .,_./ ~,._~bl\L\/\C ~'o'i,,I.., 4r,,,,, se r, ie,...._ s.s1, r \~c', ~111lv"-T 5',D '>I (.fo. .... ..,-t) uj r;:y ~ ~;,., "> l•tColit-\ /;,fl:,, 1 ~u./ $p;1e/J< Jo,..,~s',i ") v; .Jr: ~ .f ~i4 \"' ~ b~ \,Jp'1~ hr• -r z.v 'It, -t<2-c. HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants DBL, FACW, & FAC .7 /9 ,"-07"1• Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations -P-areas of prolonged inundation/saruration --Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations y-Personal knowledge of regional plant communities -- Technical Literature Other ( explain) · Hydrophytic vegetation present? < YV no Rationale for decision/Remarks: :)t."»f I e p )(1'1' ~.VI'\·." ,1:,J_ pl h1},ro f'Y{ , C '> fLL-,e) HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? @ no Based on: soil temp (record temp ) \_./ other (explain) ,. (oc:,,..\ C). ~+-ckla.. Dept. of inundation: -inclJ!'.s - Depth to free water in pit: ---.... _ -iffcl'ies Depth to saturated soil: ·inches Check all that apply & explain below: ( Stream, Lake or gage data: -- A~rial photographs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? ~ no Rationale for decision/Remarks: "96,,,. ... .'_.,., ... l .... ·\-v-yJ,,,1,,,.' vtj , fle\<11'-€.. - Water Marks: yes (r)d Sediment Deposits: yes ~ on - Drift Lines: yes 6' Drainage Patterns: yes§,) -/ Oxidized Root (live ro~ Local Soil Survey: ye~o' Channels < 12 in. ves no . . - FAC Neutral: yes mo) Water-stained Leaves yes(Jle" -~· ~explain): . } ( \lo""'"'''< ... 1-yh"/1.-,,/·c -~ ''" ,,, f><<-· . ' A ....... -t~ .. o-" OJ l-y~v•l £'..,o,\]1 tY ./1) 5,-lv,.t.•:.,!.J 1,~J~o, ~'1~/'.( < '> "/')' ,;.it: ·1~ . ·''-., . ~.,.-· • .. '." .. !.· i\: .. .. SOILS Map Unit Name e_~.g; s· fty <!.J.7 1'5a,'-"' (Series & Phase) :-J-.f <,¥Kj. D -/} ·Drainage Class Pcor~ (A:i ~ Field observations confirm @ No Taxonom e? Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size & contrast structure, etc. profile moist) moist) (match descriQtion) 0 -l't+ ;. 5y:s/;;i. 7:Syil i/v C.'77>1 ,,., "7'7, fi'iic - silly clay f o..._,.,., A me a,,,,,.-,, pn!711Nn/ Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) __L_ Matrix chroma $ 2 with mottles --Histosol __ . _ Histic Epipedon __ Mg or Fe Concretions ....:!__ Sulfidic Odor r~ •fly {A-;,.,}-__ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Aquic Moisture Regime __ . _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Reducing Conditions __ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma(=!) matrix Other fexolain in remarks) Hydric soils present? (§) no Rationale for decision/Remarks: • v-el. ., c.,e,;f/ o/<-, J. ti' C. ~ r 'O M-1.. e-. ..,,/ ,,-'!_cf O ,,X -f-~:'1vt o,1.! . .f · ,·s a, '"'Y ,, V' l.o~ '"'-''1tt...""t("'1)L S,c,($, Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? d§D no Hydric soils present? c§ no Is the sampling point (E)_ no Wetland hydrology oresent? «es, no within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: r· r,.r~ ~ • .J-. 7('..,_ s 1 ,.._ ~r,-,,,; .d<L-r 5 ,(-\_,.-~_(;' .-;.;,_, ·1 I t.e.-I OC'A/..(, q ,, I /1. ( I "Tl~r "'-L· l,~t'-f'(.... ........ I'-,,_,,~;:r,1.,,.J. NOTES: Revised 4/97 DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Dellneation Manual or 1987 Corns Wetland Delineation Manuan Project/Site: Sf ri '2J b n,ol:. -() ni f-D . Applicant/owner: Investigator/s): /3. Ho/lowMI, m, l.!xx.kllli: ,unn .. Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? CifP no Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical siruation)? yes Cw Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes ~- Explanation of atypical or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Date: /b/:1..'/0.'I- County: ~7' State: l,V,4 SJTIR: '5b. rz,,v, rz-'it Community ID: f':5S ' ' Transect ID: <v<..-tla..-.Q. .D-1 Plot ID: P /p/ II tj.. . Dominant Plant Species Strarum o/o cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Strarum % cover Indicator C/r1'v-l; . !v t t,,,t.A.- -l-s fo 4vv . -+- f'..,b..," ... '°""''41' "-<,V!$'! 5. :lt> '-.c, tJ ,, '..:l:-II-,j{) ta..c.."-" ~...{~r,4 A,1'..,.y,,..-'1/~ ;.;,':.A f--n ~PP· (? J · H ;1;'7Ce:. ~ e.,e,f.,.J-~f'le,.... s Trau. trn(1d"~} HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC -z(., ~ kb '7\J Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation'ofplant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations ,/ areas of prolonged inundation/saturation --Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations 7 Personal knowledge of regional plant communities -- Technical Literature Other / exolain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? €, no Rationale for decision/Remarks: c.f'o ...... ·1 '.''\.,'(_j~a ly iv.ctt ,1,v,.I--v..:5.,a:t .... -t, o .-.. •• ....... -rl,<.tZ-S,...,...'r,e_, -pt..c-t i .S ~-'!.-1. I HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? ~ no Water Marks: yes no Sediment Deposits: yes no on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes no Drainage Panems: yes no ,/ other (explain) '"c.o.\. -· .... ,.vd, Dept. of inundation: --inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes no Channels < 12 in.eves") no Depth to free water in pit: __ inches F AC Neutral: yes no Water-stained Leaves yes no Depth to saturated soil: inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: -- Aerial ohoto2raphs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? @) no Rationale for decision/Remarks: -· -'°'-ti,z_ ;~a. I r, t :K:.c,;;;._ 7=..?-!.-b lt/Q c>-,,, '°(,_ ,_.,-£,,:?°.,--t-,,-{. °'"~ < H "·fs;. J",.·.;,... ~.~(~ , f(""r I~ r ,,.,1,,.,,, <, . ....., -t-1 ' ,_ /} {, -" J",."' I "fl~, - I V' . SOILS •. r· \.,\Jd .'.... ...' o -I , 'riot~ l' t .. -· . • Map Unit Name Pv5a 51'4 C,( "1 loa,.,.vv ',!· . Drainage Class Po0d, dmin,,J "!Ii .. \·. (Series & Phase) ~-. @ ,&,_< Field observations confirm . Yes Taxonomy (sub11roup) ..c\'..:,,,n..tf'-t...A..-<'.A,, ........ {•°" .. it. . manned tvoe? I ~ \ I} / .. .:i " • .. Profile Description •. Depth Horizon Matrix color Monie colors Monie abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil ':,·~--. (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size & cont.rast structure, etf. profile , moist\ moist) >;-:. (match descri12iion) .... .. /oyi-:,j'f ... 6-ID A -__..:..; .-·,,." . 5a,ndy loan-, . ·t· ._ ID-1-13 /C,'jfl3j:J. IO'jR3/v h}a,nJ ,· 14:"n~, dt< lirid 5/!W>d!J /(),un ' ,. · .. , Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) / \-1atrix chroma :,; 2 with mottles --Histosol __ Histic Epipedon _._.-_Mg or Fe Concretions --Sulfidic Odor __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ . _ Aquic Moisture Regime __ . _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ ·_. Reducing Conditions __ . Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=I) matrix Other ( explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? cfil> no Rationale for decisi,m/Remarks: l'...o'"'-' ~(""6 ......... ""--..-Q. ...... -HI,~ .... .. "' ,,J; CA.:kivc.... .-( 1,...yJr1c.,, -..a.'ls • Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? @') no Hydric soils present? ® no Is the sampling point @ no Wetland hydrolo<>v nresent? eves'.> no within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: -·· o-ll "3 Q. r t';,e...r1' <:.-"-~IL -ct . ~ s ..__,_T(.z;.. I e c:.,,::t, I • )'\ ,·~ "-" 'TU• "-~ "-'ec' le.-. L' ' NOTES: doh,f "1'1"-"-' jv k -j;ue tnofl/-,,,1 o<soua.lcd lN/ ,r;rfdhed roof cha.nne/J'. Revised 4/97 .. . t . DATA FORM };(Revised) Routine Wetland llittermination ,&( C ••• ,. (WA State Wetland Delileati~t{Manual or ~ ·• 1987 Corps Wetland De . eatioit Manual) Project/Site: Sfr;'":Jbr,:,ck-• .t Date: 10;,;,. '/ o'f Vair-D %'.· t' .. . Applicant/owner: >, County: ,t...,:.y ,~re·· th//ow"!:!f, m. t3o~ /::. = l: """I' State: W.4 lnvesti1rntor( s ): 8. Sff/R: ~r: .,..Z. '.VJ ,:Z.c:/~ Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ~ ri.,fi• . Community ID: 'P.f"o ' <:®'. : Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes Transect ID: C>c l~ .. ,...._ ls the area a poien\jal'Problem Area? yes ® Plot-ID: PM -ii 3 Explanation of atvnical or problem area: ..... .... , .. 0 . ..;.._, VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb'(\l,= vine) .~'., Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum % cover Indicator Doii,inant Plant Soecies Stratum % cover lndicator -'r 7 c;o F,..c.. .. p 6 t><>\"', I I . . ,,,,_ Co~~ C •-'IA£- ....4-. 5. Jo . t:11 c.. . ~ J( l{::VIIM'?CV fur Yef"")S H 50 !Acw l /.I 5o FA<:.vv ·s-· pt,;._ti:,..r, \ r~rv~;, •• e,;;;., Pol .... c._+·,~ -~~ ... ......... _; ... II /rt1re FA-CU \. /.1' 1,.1 ,,.,.,.,_ .(; (;,;. ifu.,, ...,._, II frc,ce ~(.. . HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION1NDICATORS: % of dominanis OBL, FACW, &: FAC. 'f/"I =-1 oo 7o Check all indicators that apply & explain below: I Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations '7" I areas of prolonged inundation/saturation Wetland plant database --./ Morphological adaptations t/ Personal knowledge of regional plant communities i Technical Literature Other ( exi,Jain) I Hydrophytic vegetation present? ~-· no 1 Rationale for decision/Remarks: V<j~•~ ..... -tl.a... s.,.........f{L--pl..+-·~ Jo.,..._/ ....._,--t~ 7 r...,J~,,__ ~·~-I HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? a§> no Water Marks: ,CEJ no ~ Sediment Deposits: yes no I on' frees (_,olimwood) Based on: ' soil temp (record temp ) ,.0..-b: Drift Lines: yes no Drainage Patterns: yes no ii other (explain) Ion.I r 1,...,..+e, ~. Dept. of inundation: _.¢-inches Oxidized Root (Jive roots) Local Soil Survey: yes no I Channels <12 in.(vef) no Depth to free water in pit: 2..!B.._ inches FACNeutral: yes no Water-stained Leaves yes no Depth to saturated soil: Zl1L. inches I Check all that apply & explain below: Ot~er ( explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: .. -- Aerial photo~raphs: Other: 1 Wetland hydrology present? c§) no ~:_:. Rationale for decision/Remarks: • W.(.."t[,.,,,Q_ ~Ml'l5,I VJl.,'t>t-f'= .,_,.. I,:. ', ~ ,..,_, Jl.. z.£.. rl,..; .,_,.,-; pC..e:-e,i, o.,r<l, I ,,_,Q: c,d, ve, ,;( t}.·. '.\. - -·' SOILS ,1',; WvHa,nd D-1 Pto-t*ci =~ it. ) 021 I :t 1 c,,( "-'1 \:Drainage Class '· liiod'1 dm !nek Map Unit Name 'f)"541..± ( 6 "-""-"" " (Series & Phase) ;~ ;;: Taxonomy (subgroup) -t/uv"u.J.-/, t. . . Field observations confirm (9 No l,,,,.d •• ds jf \i manned tvne? ' V I . f}f Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, D_rawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size & contr~~ structure, etc: profile , moist) moist) ' . (match descri12tion) 0-'f OtJanic -----. /. ., ,-.··· rnv1 n.J, lt1e.dtUIT'7 1 - '-1-18 A '"'YR 5/~ ID YR 4/~ Si Iii, c/oJ /,,,,,.., d,shhd - . '-'· Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) ' / ;--· --Histosol --Matrix chroma :;; 2 with mottles __ Histic Epipedon __ Mg or Fe Concretions --Sulfidic Odor __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Aquic Moisture Regime __ ·. _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Reducing Conditions __ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=l) matrix Other ( explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? ~ no Rationale for decision/Remarks: (. ,...., c.\,.. M) ~e,.._ s • .-ts ...,:-J,._ t-'41""•r-p/.•c.--t<!A."tvr~ ~ '....,{.' ~ ~ lJ..L_..--of f-, Jl. r, 't.-,;:,.,,· fs - Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ~ no Hydric soils present? (§ no ls the sampling point @ no Wetland hvdrolo~ present? ~ no within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: --·-· nu..,.,t..., µ,( 3 t.«,1-( ,:,.-,-,.d ~~"'~ ~ s---r~ l-o c,..;,b,'o"' /.; IVI 'j(..,,' YL A... ,..,<,"t{~, : NOTES: Revised 4/97 Project/Site: · '3//;':J;r.ot: - Applicant/owner: r. DATA FORM tfRevised) Routine Wetland Dftermination ~,. . . , .. (WA State Wetland Deli*atioii3\\1anual or 1987 Corns Wetland Delhieati!Jfi.Manual) Un;f D ·~~ '·N! •• ~i::-Date: foj;U/o'f County: /u n; State: w,+. Investi2ator(s): ,8, /lb!/o-,..,"'::J, !VI, /J~cf'e,, f. ""'P !'>· S/T/R: '3"t: T.,..., ,_,_ it.lJ. ... Do Nonna! Circumstances exist on the site? .~ ii\)'.,.' Community ID: p~ "4{ ';. ( 1/ri_; Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical siruation)? yes ~ Tra.nsect ID: D-1 _ Is the area a potentyil Problem Mea? yes ~·· Plot JD: /i/,f ~.:), Explanation of atypical or oroblem area: ·-. VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb;'}f.,,..vine) .y.-. Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dolriinant Plant Species Stratum 0/o cover Indicator I H,/ !f f O AI/IY/ /Jyl r< plf"'/177 lrrH 75 OBt.. >le --,-y·;.L c~.£,,,. II-10 ()81.. .. -'I< _l;ic/,;ns cern14 "-II /6 ht£ ti/ I-,• /3c,r~ 4r6und JI /0 t·: J : .: {··- HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC 3 /~ "loO~o Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in _L_ Physiological/reproductive adaptations -;7" areas of prolonged inundation/saruration Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations --Personal knowledge of regional plant communities /. Technical Literature Other (explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ~· no Rationale for decision/Remarks: kw-v,•wdQ.Q bl V 'i)d'~" ""' "'"t ~ ~~r1"2.,-[-. c.,,::t, o"'-,·.-. kycPr-,h-tfc..-sr44A, HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? @ no Water Marks: yes no -,Sediment Deposits: yes no on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes no Drainage Patterns: @ ·no-._,.. other (explain) lac.J ~ J, .•• -<+G . .£rlr. Dept. of inundation: ___j_inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Channels < 12 in, dB\ no Local Soil Survey: yes no Depth to free water in pit: .zjf,_ inches F ACNeutraJ: yes no Water-stained Leaves yes no Depth to sarurated soil: /8 inches Check all that apply & explain below: Ot~er (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: . --·- Aerial photographs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? ·(§ no Rationale for decision/Remarks: I forided ~,~<J./ d<.prc~s10,-, w/;,, Jo !f s~ ~', p r "-''1..,,,-->j ~ -p,,.:j:{Q..--"-S ~ ()Y.,,;,~ I -L ... t--.I" ----l --J' /,Alli 'Jl,i :-L n ,. ,,.,._, ~ ~ ' ' : I ,, - •• • SOILS Map Unit Name (Series & Phase) i Wd-larid b-1 , Pio+ #-1_ f .. 1 :\' Drainage Class P,.orS J o,J "'eJ :'¥- Taxonomv (sub11.roun) i'(,.i., • .rr :, I.--'· nv•~ts Yes No Profile Description Depth Horizon (inches) J 0 -1.f O'Ja'"' '+-r&-t A Matrix color (Munsell moist) - 10 ye.s/2.. I I I Mottle colors (Munsell moist) - /c, YR 5/r.:, Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) __ Histosol __ Histic Epipedon __ Sulfidic Odor __ Aguie Moisture Regime __ . Reducing Conditions GI eyed or Low-Chroma (=I) matrix Hydric soils present? Cr§) no Rationale for decision/Remarks: Mottle abunaance size & cont;~! ','.._-:·-,., -· ;·:. cum mon/:/:;n~~ d,sfihc+ .··. Texture, concretions, structure, e·t£. 51/fy dQy loom _L_it;trix chroma s 2 with mottles __ Mg or Fe Concretions Drawing of soil profile (match description) f !of, <>f roaf "'=, __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ . _ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Other (explain in remarks) (.a,,_, c..\,_rc,....._,._ ,._.Q ""•-!tf, "':'.'.J v,.,,e,z;t --tl..,_ Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soils present? Wetland hvdrolouv oresent? Rationale/Remarks: no no no Is the sampling point within a wetland? @ no ~ ....u 3 W<.-1..( «.-n.! ~,. .,J-,,,_.._ ,t...... 6""-1'"'-{~ c....:t• ,..,, I<;. ,v,';l.,,·n "'-' \..'-'~~' NOTES: Revised 4/97 ,· =- DATA FORM ~~Revised) Routine Wetland J))\terlilination ~!. '-... ~-i_· (WA State Wetland Deli~atiO:'fManual or 1987 Corns Wetland Delbiea:tili'it Manual) Project/Site: .S:r r '.j b ~C><>C Applicant/owner: Investigator(s): P. Tt>,;her, t3. I/. !/,,way, M. &< fen/c,,mp, Do Nonna! Circumstances exist on the site? . C yyeses") J:..• .. ·.'f·····,. · Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical siruation)? <..m.v Is tbe area a potentjal ·Problem Area? yes <§fi' Explanation of atvPical or oroblem area: ·. · VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herl>}:V,,..vine) ' .-~ . f·. Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Sejl,<: lvc,,'Ja.-" .... r: ' T 15 1v1/.L lf...cl · JJ~ ~:.,e /uc,itle,.. ...-.~ · i S. 'fo. µ :r.(-lo.. IA.~f' · ... I -• '* /5 c:., ;! " ., s S <l,r I (:. t,A.. · ' S'. ta..c. II/ -r,ri, ..... 1 .. -+,·~1,,_ II lo Obi . X pi,.._ Ip..,, s 4...Jr\>,,/\.J.. / }1 11, ti, 1A f/. "lo I.C. ,. .,_, HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION1NDICATORS: %ofdominantsOBL,FACW,&FAC 'f/4;::. {OOJJ Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Doni.inant Plant Species ~~1,::,~ rs~u:r,J,.·/,'<, I ,+) .. ,· ' . .- ,., .. .. Date: lbl_:;1.1/of County: /(i"J State: WA. Sff/R: ?J.J:. '. T7-:tU Community ID: P5$ Ttansect JD: lvL, D -I Plot-ID: f /,,f * / Stratum 0/o cover 5 /r,,r~ Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations areas of prolonged inundation/saturation __ Wetland plant database Indicator z Morphological adaptations Personal knowledge of regional plant communities 1-T=ec::.hn=ica=I =L<:it::,erc::a.:.:tu::.re=------,:------::::--'=v'=~--=O..::th;:;e::.r ... (•e.:.:x.:.,<P::.la;:;in:::•l,....__ ______________ ~==~--1' Hydrophytic vegetation present? CYe's) no Rationale for decision/Remarks: V~a...-bo"' ,.,, ,j..o....,.,',,.,deJL \,,f t....1Jroy~4,e,, ~re,c-'~· HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? no Based on: --,--soil temp (record temp ___ ) v'. other /exolainl lo··' "'·· • (! ,,_"' Dept. of inundation: _J2_ inches Depth to free water in pit: 'Z!1z.... inches Depth to saturated soil: ZLf-inches Check all that apply & explain below: Stream, Lake or gage data: __ Aerial photo=nhs: Wetland hydrology present? Rationale for decision/Remarks: Other: no Water Marks: yes ® ~ Sediment Deposits: yes @) on Drift Lines: yes® Oxidized Root (live roots) Channels <12 in.~ no FA~ 1-leutral: (!"j no Ot)Jer (explain): .~: Drainage Patterns: yes .:1§) Local Soil Survey: yes no Water-stained Leaves yes <JiQ':) SOILS Map Unit Name Pv~!! llvp 1i11 rk ""zo.c,&r (o"'-'- (Series & Phase) or c::;:;)-U Drainage Class t,.,,e../1 i:.r,. , ,. e fl Field observations confirm Yes G ma ed e? Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size & contrast structure, etc. profile moist) moist) (match descri11tion) 0 -,<s"t A t O pt..'fh.. --6t St- Hydric Soil Indicators: ( check all that apply) --Histosol __ Matrix chroma $ 2 with mottles __ Histic Epipedon __ Mg or Fe Concretions --Sulfidic Odor __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Aguie Moisture Regime __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Reducing Conditions __ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Gleved or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Other ( explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? yes @ Rationale for decision/Remar1: tvo , -.i >' c.a..."t"or-s , ~ Jr. C. .,,, o-, 't-s - Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ~ no Q Hydric soils present? yes div Is the sampling point yes Wetland hvdroloov present? yes r/o) within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: ~ rr"-~/ i,,v.(__ "t£eu,,J7 t<-Y ¥ro/ "77 I vvf I c.;;;/. or. 0... \ +I,... • ..,~1.._ "'<.:tL,v..-$ -p{.....J-s -&•,'Is ()-(' e, ,;:_,k,~ ~ s ,v,..,.-p/112., h, e,.O;,' ' ""-,·~ "ri µ/-rl,..1 )'\.. "-IV ,(,-ti ,w,f • I NOTES: Revised 4/97 Project/Site: Sf-)r•""5 b.-oc-~ Applicant/owner: DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) Q.r,e,z+ I"'""", c... Date: II If"/•'{ County: le..,~ State: ..,.., ,.. Investieator(s): ,P. 1 ,..,. l A,.. ,u . ..i.~4" S/T/R: -US' TZ..7,µ ~'-lie Do Normal Circumstance! exist' on the site? ~ no Community ID: v7'/,,,.,..,,t. Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation}? yes i Transect ID: C.-3 Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes Plot ID: ._,..e, -rf _...,/2. C--l Explanation of atypical or problem area: Pl•"'" z._.., VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = berb; V = vine} Dominant Plant Snecies Stratum %cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator C...~-...... ,\...+..-1 A.Al ,r ., <;._ * 5 -i.o -t<LC,u-1 1" L , ,, • , ,s+ $ ~r-t,:.cJ r, -t"11t ... ~ s sr .C..e,,.,.; ~-,_ ·- "" l \... •.• ~,i, • .\..,...1,.,. + 14 '-{ () .(:'«-<-- V HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC ~/~, ]r'l• Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations ___L areas of prolonged inundation/saturation --Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations v-Personal knowledge of regional plant communities -- Technical Literature Other ( explain) Hydrophytlc vegetation present? ~ no Rationale for decision/Remarks: ../. • .._,, ,,,,.AeJ "-,J..,.7c..y-r-,;_,. "'<1{i~~-t, 0.,.. .·-~ s""""'" T'"'-\ O <.cd:i O (I. .',;, t,7 ~(,/'<% HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? @ no Water Marks: yes @, Sediment Deposits: yes § on Based on: , soil temp (record temp l Drift Lines: yes l!!Y' Drainage Patterns: yes @, J other ( explain) ,_ . _ I ~ Ii "" -'-<--A! cb- Dept. of inundation: ~inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes @3 Channels <12 in. ves t!f7 Depth to free water in pit: 2..!ainches Depth to saturated soil: , , ,,_ inches FAC Neutral: yes@ Water-stained Leaves yes~ Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: -- Aerial ohoto<>rnnhs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? Rationale for decision/Remarks: yes ® f-J C •' ,,...._J,• C,..A.,\Or-S, 6"f ....,,e:tlJ 1;,.,,., JI'«. I o< '-I I "I SOILS Map Unit Name Pvy• 11' fw, -..,,.,,~ b (Series & Phase) Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors (inches) (Munsell (Munsell moist) moist) o,~ (\-l0'1 ~ 'S [1, , i-~+-~,, /J)'f { ~ti lD y, q ,~ Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) --Histosol __ Histic Epipedon --Sulfidic Odor __ Aguie Moisture Regime __ Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low-Chroma(=!) matrix Hydric soils present? ,V no Rationale for decision/Remarks rw-Mle.s l-oi,J c/.,ivov,o,., ,So;\ S <,I ;-\-l., Wetland Determination (circle) ' Hydrophytic vegetation· present? (l;) no Hydric soils present? @> no Wetland hvdroloc,v oresent? t1e's::) no Rationale/Remarks: Drainage Class w•J t J.r-t,.,"-f £ Field observations confim1 Yes e? Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Dra,wing of soil size & contrast structure, etc. profile (match descri11tion) G~ L F = . w ,., ""ID"I ' Gi ( L. ;;z!,_ Matrix chroma ~ 2 with mottles __ Mg or Fe Concretions __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Other ( explain in remarks) '"o\.,.-~t k1 d\v'.c __ 50-./ yveJe.., uz.... Is the sampling point c:> no within a wetland? fldt. f; \\ 5 '1 q fk,e,a.... Cv· i e , . .., .,., i.,-J, : S" --f{ "V ~ fD.!<c ..,:t-l,". h A. we_-f(.,..,.>-.._ NOTES: Lock-1-t.\ .,.., iv {-,.y-LJe)+ o-f fl) 5) Revised 4/97 -\! # ~ .. .. Project/Site: 'Sp r~ J hn,o K Applicant/owner: DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) 1/\":-r-L Date: l 1/T/o~ County: \<; ') State: I./ fr lnvesti~ator(s): M.li. ~1""'. -S/T/R: A~, fZ,.?;AJ, ~(/~ Do Nonnal Circumstances exist on the site? Co/~ Community ID: n-'D · Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes . Transect ID: L--.3, · ls the area a potential Problem Aiea? yes o Plot ID: tt-w (_ I.!--3 ) Exolanation of atvnical or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum % cover Indicator r r,{"' ... c, ';e,v :£er. ~ iD L _. ,i ~ ...... rA { ,vvti. NJ,. L 7 '10 L i) i;_ ~ ;-./ .,;tc..[,.,,\: <, < tJ5' L,,__, r ~ ~ f.ll,\ ... 1 Lls~.,;.fe01 -i, HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC I~ Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in PhysiologicaVreproductive adaptations -;;;z--areas of prolonged inundation/saturation --Wetland plant database -- Morphological adaptations )( Personal knowledge of regional plant communities --Technical Literature Other (exolain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ~ no Rationale for decision/Remarks: HYDROLOGY rf9 ls it the growing season? no Water Marks: yes 6io' Sediment Deposits: yes no on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes {!!J) Drainage Patterns: yes fiw' ,/ other / exolain) lo cv.. A [,,...,.t; ,V&J.., Dept. of inundation: -inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: y~ no -- Channels < 12 in. ves Iii& .. ) Depth to free water in pit: ~inches FAC Neutral: (!;Y ·no Water-stained Leaves ye~ Depth to saturated soil: ~inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: --<f/tL -r Acw fl.-Y c, ..... .., .•.. ·\'i" \.,f ,t.,'' Aerial ohoto2raohs: Other: s .... \ s Wetland hydrology present? . C? . no Rationale for decision/Remarks: ~,j,.,\o) 1 V<¥J,,o f \,fr' ~. '\, -. ~ A. (. ~ L cJQ .\.\ . .,.,.I_ Jt.)t-\,,\.o°" c,,-.A ~'(~''L I ' SOILS Map Unit Name Woorl,"11;lk.. S.·1-11......., (Series & Phase) Taxonom Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors (inches) (Munsell (Munsell moist) moist) 0-l&I-.4 1cy!l.f2 Jo YR <f/r, Hydric Soil Indicators: ( check all that apply) Histosol -- __ Histic Epipedon --Sulfidic Odor __ Aguie Moisture Regime __ Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low-Chroma (= 1) matrix Hydric soils present? @) no Rationale for decision/Remarks: L-o,.t.., e-,-~ f""6'"""'1~ £.o; { "'1it.-·tr /C"'~ c...v,·-.<- .,,._ .,JZ-r, c.-"':,a , '/<;, • Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? yes @ Hydric soils present? ~ no Wetland hvdrolo"" oresent? ves ,n<f'i (!.,-§(µp10 ,.,cl Drainage Class Pood, t>'7M..J Field observations confirm Yes No e? Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil size & contrast structure, etc. profile (match descri11tion) mony, Ant:, sillz, /t>,un.. .d1j fin cf ~ Matrix chroma :5 2 with mottles __ Mg or Fe Concretions __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Other ( exolain in remarks) ,....,)2 0 )(.. -t,uc..,"tJ<e~ t<,r,Z.. • .,Ji 'c,vt, ..,e_, o-( ls the sampling point yes ® within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: f' r-..,:.S,<~~,J / I\.. 4f 1,... 0.., t,.. ',J,.., t.,, -=bo;l ~ <'--<--,~-L-t(,..,..J ,1 e"f;d,d > 0 YI t:>.,.__Q t.yR°''"7 A,r'Z.-,t..b,.~, ~-<;=y/.Q.. ( oo, .. 1::-, o , , ,s --r a..,v,,k' . NOTES: Revised 4/97 'Project/Site: 2Pri J!(?ro,,J:. Applicant/owner: DAT A FORM ,1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) ~(' Date: 11~"-/•f County: IG.:y Investil'(ator(s): /J, To -L , --M. . (;xnh,....f.~' 1:,. 1/oa l!W"-'-- State: WA- S/f/R: 7{' 'T'7.~ . JZ.' c Do Normal Circumstanc!e's exist on the site? . (iF) no V Community JD: · • flyl~e. "/. · Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes ~ Transect ID: C-c. vr\......Q., ,,,..,.a__ Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes diii::> Plot JD: /J/ pr -.# I Exolanation of atvoical or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum % cover Indicator "* t'rcvv,: • ._\A,;,-~ 5 50 FACu -,../< l:;i ... ..+ 'II ,, ... ' "'4~ .. ......+ ... 1-1 /0 FACU J ,, t2.1l...1,1<; A --' ~-'-5 7rarc k/\C..t) -. ---A"" ru-rt, s ,Sp-I-/ I race F/IC ~ _ I Loi; vm 5?f H Jrace -&..c.v /l«d. ~ -1-1 /0 +A4.,J CtUI Af11 ,j >'"-$5 HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC __!b__:___? 1, '11 Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations -- areas of prolonged inundation/saturation --Wetland plant database -- Morphological adaptations --Personal knowledge of regional plant communities _;L_ Technical Literature Other (explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? yes ® Rationale for decision/Remarks: ,r<~ '7~).td' \j~\o,'w\., i~ rl., .... r-A,l-,P g__, ~ HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? @ ·no Water Marks: yes <ff) Sediment Deposits: yes {!9 on Based on: soil temp (record temp • .1,,.,, Drift Lines: yes (!ffe' Drainage Patterns: yes e, .,/ other fexolainl fc.,a f (I /j u_...._t-.e..- Dept. of inundation: __Q__ inches Oxidized Root (live roo~ Local Soil Survey: yes~ Channels < 12 in. yes Depth to free water in pit: :;J.:(;.,. inches F AC Neutral: yes& Water-stained Leaves yes& Deoth to saturated soil: 2...1.b. inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other ( explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: -- Aerial ohotograohs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? yes (!iv Rationale for decision/Remarks: u.-C'!" I ...__.Q k--;r( r-d o:; / , ~C> . , .. .f' , ,-,(to r .s J " . SOILS -~ , or s Map Unit Name IM~ n ,,,' ILt S ,' It ( cruv.. (Series & Phase) Drainage Class P0o ~ Jn1,., J · Field observations confirm ®' No ma ed e? Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size & contrast structure, etc. profile moistl moist) (match descriQtion) o-r::: 4 10 ~( i/1---· -5·, L -··· s-nA--1> ID '1l' i/i, \b1.1r y/4 f>\t~I"-'" I ,o~..,..., s~ L • ., Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) -2_ Matrix chroma $ 2 with mottles --Histosol __ Histic Epipedon __ Mg or Fe Concretions --Sulfidic Odor __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Aquic Moisture Regime __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Reducing Conditions __ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=I) matrix Other (exolain in remarks) Hydric soils present? {jjY no 'l k..ov -, 'l-O v-.. ,._('OIA i,,..~ 17. ; .. <Lt<, Rationale for decision/Remarks: e,,, I, 0 ,.. ·~ -rk --+ lo-.; c.,l,.volM"-";,\) w~'\\ pre. ':IZ"<-t .,.(. V'1.o fl-I.e. 5 Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ~ no G:::> Hydric soils present? ~-:> no ls the sampling point no Wetland hvdrolo0 v nresent? no within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: '-----' s.,.,,.,'( It fk,-t .(-, \\ ~ JI t~v~e t.V.,\-{(•C' "\'I j-. ,S -rk,{ fo /(2. v ,'t'i,,. "\ (,. ,Jt4/--,\ NOTES: ti"} \q v.) ~l!)C•\tJ..-~0 (Ol'N-{ o>k eif-ll' 1 , kt.,..u" '" 0 ~J5~i),._ vi'·"\.., " f ~ V' \C_ I\"j Revised 4/97 -= . • Project/Site: Sf( b I,::._ ') r,' Applicant/owner: DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manuan I.II" it l--Date: 11/,(01 County: !.(;+1-- State: w Jnve~ti2ator(s): M , A . P.l S/T/R: :;,._.:: T 2.:~ .U a_1.1, ,=- Do Nol'!l1al Circumstances exist on the site? w no Community ID: 1'-fo , Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes ~ Transect ID: ('c!-z'.;)-· Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes Plot ID: vJ 1.. s Explanation of atvnical or oroblem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Snecies Stratum % cover Indicator . '-'{, S .. ,., b ~,.,,, r" lw, .5,,.. 7 iv -(~ i \. ' -ic s 10 .{',u.,v (7'1.olfl'-.--L n°;"1C..., 1-' Co'""', ~e.r; ce"' ·i'= 5 3o _L,,./ ' It-\ ~o {<'UY' fa,"'\"'\ \.\5,,.,,;~I)(• s J.>< ;. ,co~l .. 1;.~,._ T 1-s ~ HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % ofdomina~ts OBL, FACW, & FAC '3/r;-~ C, 00 O Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in PhysiologicaVreproductive adaptations -----:::7 areas of prolonged inundation/saturation --Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations --Personal knowledge of regional plant communities -- Technical Literature ---1.L_ Other / exolain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? (5> no Rationale for decision/Remarks: HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? 6P no Water Marks: yes {ffo Sediment Deposits: yes ~~1 on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes C} Drainage Patterns: yes cfJy !.L other/exolain) (o--' c;,I ,-tSe.-d.¢. Dept. of inundation: -=-inches Oxidized Root (Jive roo~.v ChaMels <12 in. ves - Local Soil Survey: yesa Depth to free water in pit: 21:Binches F AC Neutral: yes~ Water-stained Leaves yes@ Depth to saturated soil: ~inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other ( explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: -- Aerial ohoto2raohs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? ~ no Rationale for decision/Remarks: A)fvw,,<.-} l,. • \( J-""' v-,6,,of1+ t ve '){A"\ :o "' Acl/'V\· .... ol\"\ ~ l,, l"\,\ ),... 1,-/'\ , -'-s() ~\. 1, '< _, SOILS. Map Unit Name iw.,J.,"',,../L,,, ,;1 ft t. ..... ®- (Series & Phase) Taxonom Prome Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors (inches) (Munsell (Munsell moist) moist) 0-/!Pf A Joyt'//).. 7 · S yrz. 3/'t Hydric Soil Indicators: ( check all that apply) --Histosol __ Histic Epipedon --Sulfidic Odor __ Aquic Moisture Regime __ Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=I) matrix Hydric soils present? ~ no Drainage Class Po 0 ,.t 7 J?ry..,~ Field observations confirm G No ma ed e? Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil size & contrast structure, etc. profile (match descri11tion) m Q I f}\{ f_.; v.-,.,.1 p-~ c,,i' I b ,p_, "--- / Matrix chroma $ 2 with mottles __ Mg or Fe Concretions __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Other ( exolain in remarks) Rationale for decision/Remarks: ,-Jo;<. r ~. C, • ..-,:£ / ~-t. y'£_., A ...,.--rt,.. -tva--tv' '1..-S {.,o ,,_, cl,.. .... o,,,_.A,./ ~;1~ t-.,J2r • •-C:.-<p; I. Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ; no Hydric soils present? no Is the sampling point c6 no Wetland hvdroloov oresent? no within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: (<. t l ,L~IL{L..-6,-!.., £, .r J ~ ;"v'WL. f-'1 C("p•v-{ ·77,,,.. -=-~rt.e. 1,,,,,.,,.-:t. ov,. .• ~ , ........ ,wr\. (;L ,u-=le,,,,.-2 - NOTES: Revised 4/97 •. Project/Site: 5/n:jhnn;k,. Applicant/owner: DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corns Wetland Delineation Manual) Un.ilc.. Date: !O/-z.1..-j1'f County: /C.1.., State: w ,i 'If Investieator(s ); Y. -r-.,.. L. 1B .,. I L. ·_. ~ ll,t/,,,, .... S/T/R: ~ ... tZ,"2,µ, I) .L/.e: Do Normal Circumstan\!es ex\st on the site? " ~ no Community ID: pe6{ Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes <!!§> Transect ID: ( (!. _.._., ls the area a potential Problem Area? yes © Plot ID: f/1f ti / ' Explanation of atypical or problem area: . VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum % cover Indicator. Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum % cover Indicator f;G.Ja,,,\ (}.. r, ,-1.: \A."" I ,/h -I+ 1: /1}0 fi;....c.-lA,/ j -t 6(0. ..£.._ .• , ,G;.., I j IC /, ',.(,.. Cor"'"" e.e.r,-,,_ s /0 l!a..c,w . HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC t.fi,,,_ 100'1, Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations areas of prolonged inundation/saturation --Wetland plant database _iL_ Morphological adaptations ~ Personal knowledge of regional plant communities -- Technical Literature Other ( exolain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? < Y•S") no Rationale for decision/Remarks: Jo,.,., ~.JL -b7 v~,ro,.:t,o,'\..,c;t ~. ,...~rl-<... fl~'$ (._._; ..-..,~-r;' <.,,· ': / '., -. HYDROLOGY , I • Is it the growing season? C§ no Water Marks: yes ~ Sediment Deposits: yes ~ on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes '<IQ.) Drainage Patterns: yes ~ ._/ other (exolain) louJ c,,L·-·.,.,,, J~ . Dept. of inundation: _!L_ inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes~ Channels <12 in~ no Depth to free water in pit: -finches FAC Neutral: (!;j iio Water-stained Leaves ye~ Depth to saturated soil: inches Check all that apply & explain below:' Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: -- Aerial photographs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? ~ no Rationale for decision/Remarks: pf'o .(. k, I ~,,.C e-ef., ' CJ.,,,· ,.r.,-zef ) {< ,?a. vf'P"" r l'ZII ut Tid-':?•, I ,_,e,. ci1. .'-::,., ;J,t.,c,r <£·-S, ~ ..t"'I' 1,...,_J/ I Iv c{ r<, / O~ ' . 7 } 1. SOILS Map Unit Name P1 (I llvr £>1(1,.. C.eu,01 I ~0,,- (Series & Phase) ~::...-_:_I , 3 s Drainage Class _iw,_Jl_J'---/'tJ.i-n_J:.__ Taxonom ffv~ic.,. \o,"er<> !Is Field observations confirm Yes No Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size & contrast structure, etc. profile moist) moist) (match descriQtion) '--()-'5 ,(1 l O '(¥--,,f z. -~· l C,""""1. / ' v ;7-I 'o-t A, Z.·'>'f '1 { .. ?.">~~ 'f/~ "J:'.:':11 ~ . .J, /,' 14v b~.u . Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) --Histosol _i,C_ Matrix chroma !> 2 with mottles __ Histic Epipedon __ Mg or Fe Concretions --Sulfidic Odor __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Aquic Moisture Regime __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Reducing Conditions __ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma (~I) matrix Other (exolain in remarks) Hydric soils present? yes ~ Rationale for decision/Remarks: f'f 7cl//c.. So,/<;. <..,• .... e.L.,. r" ~I)._ VV'> .._ 1' I" ,·.,.: .,., ,,.c._ {'(.),o )C ~~S ,' ... , .. ) /e-edf 11..v Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? I no Hydric soils present? no Is the sampling point (3' no Wetland hvdroloav ore sent? no within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: A--ll 1{..,..,u. C,.r,'fe.ri'o-,<.AL, 1M <t.,t· ' ~ s.._..rt~ loc.«:t,'on. 1 '<;. w,'it., ,. a..- w e/d cv,,, J · NOTES: i}'"'..1~T U.15 f o-( fl 4j 5 7, Revised 4/97 Project/Site: Sf "'""6 be-ow t,. Applicant/owner: DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corns Wetland Delineation Manual) eNe.L., u ... ,·1<.., Date: I( {t-/o Y County: (,:.., ~ State: t.v'A Investigator< s ): -0. --ro~ V,.t,r /)../ ,, ..__ . . S/f/R; u-: T~~µ ;ey~ Do Nonna! Circumstances exis( on the site? (.§es no Community~ P.{'o ls the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes li'IJ Transect ID: -f Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes @ Plot ID: ~ S C /J.Jd{-J. {!;.., /) Fxnlanation of atvPical or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = sluub; H = hem; V = vine) Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum % cover Indicator P~ .I , h..l~h-,to,.: --z.o .c....c... •· ,::_ J,·~ C., •• )--, •·• ... + s :,_c, l+o.-v C.,o.-,.. ..,, <,:, j C,<Z.4-- + 5 /1,Q +J,. .,J HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC ~/3~ 100'/, Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations -- areas of prolonged inundation/saturation --Wetland plant database ,./ Morphological adaptations -;::7 Personal knowledge of regional plant communities -- Technical Literature Other ( exolain) Bydropbytic vegetation present? (_g, no Rationale for decision/Remarks: i'c. J ow-.., .,.,.j,,,J2 ~T t..1clrof1l,t v~,t,-W.'• .,._ '"" ,l...... s......,-r'ie.... I oc-d• o ,,._ "!/"", HYDROLOGY G Is it the growing season? no Water Marks: yes (j Sediment Deposits: yes eJ on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes eJ, Drainage Patterns: yes {9 l/ other ( explain) lo...-• I cl,-.,,:: l.&-h Dept. of inundation: -=-inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Channels < 12 in. ve• ,f65 Local Soil Survey; yes (!ffT' Depth to free water in pit: ~inches FAC Neutral: c.!J)I n_o Water-stained Leaves yes ~ Deoth to saturated soil: inches Check all that apply & explain below: No;.,,~ Other (explain): Jn,;Jl6 ,.. 1n,,,,,.o.e.< ,,f r, s ,,.,1'¥.f!.., Stream, Lake or gage data: --Tit ~,J...-p_-f'-, 1 to~,'-r, ori<;1 f~'t:£ • Aerial ohotoirraobs: Other: fA.. (,' C. «:,() I /,; • Wetland hydrology present? ~ no I d Rationale for decision/Remarks: C,-<>...,../1,,v,1.1 '17 J f,._'1 J..r I c.-<;ai/-<:, I, 1-k ,--f'u.._ 'f' rd? t;.e,.,-i C"' ,,_., ,R, ..... r 7 f,'c.. rr ~ SOILS Map Unit Name luo~ln,1: Ila-Si I+ lat-v-- (Series & Phase) Taxonom Profile Description Drainage Class Poo"lytk:nunuk Field observations confirm @' No e? Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size & contrast structure, etc. profile moist) moist) (match descri11tion) ()-1 A-tolj~ -ih --S:L --' ~ -\~ .\ j \o 1r ~)l \o~f "!)i Y\r(..Ji...,,-.. s,-L Yn~~ ~ -4i,,.,;,"""f' Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) _2:'.S_ Mairix chroma :£ 2 with mottles ~Histosol __ Histic Epipedon __ . · _ Mg or Fe Concretions · --Sulfidic Odor __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Aquic Moisture Regime __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils -.--· Reducing Conditions __ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=l) matrix Other (explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? Rationale for decision/Remarks: (j§7 no Low £, hvt.> ~ " .. ,!, IM''/Jk< ~~ C, v--: u--v·; 'DY\ Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present?. ' no # Hydric soils present? no Is the sampling point no ' within a wetland? Wetland hvdroloi,v present? no Rationale/Remarks: v ;.\{-..',,, l) i--1-\'V\..\ A-11 +I,,, e,e_ cv;./i:.,r ;" r, ( e. ~T. j)\,;-l) ~ NOTES: ~ Lu-,0 1 c r_ 1:t v o-r Revised 4/97 i ) ;J l r~ ' . ' , ' Project/Site: ':S·P (, ~)I:, ('O~ k_. Applicant/owner: · DATA FORM 1 (Revised)/ Routihe Wetl?!'d-~lltion, {WA State Wetland Deline~tion Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manuall -,-/ !A-~ ·,'1" L -- -· /,, ' ;·. . Date: I O /z.6 /o i -. County: \,(:'-"') State: wK Investieatot'!s): 12,.,, L \:'...-r \J. J ll bW;.>'.f /('fl 'Ii ,4...,.k1r-. Sff/R: ?,.!"' -rn ~ • , ,e '/ 13. Do Nonna! CircumstancJs exist on the s!tt? ~ @ Community ID: ~r(.S\C.A. we,\'\.11~ Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical siruation)? yes Transect ID: (e.~,) l . --, Is the arell a potential Problem Area? yes .,,.·: _ Plot ID: f>~o~'5 - Explanation of atvoical or oroblem area: - VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) --..___, ' Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant S-cies Stratum· % cover Indicator ~\:. .... i. ;.l1"''.f/\1f\1_.',t,.', 5 ) -hu,c1·---:~h',!.,:~ Ms1:1Ji,.., .... r:\-ii ..(,u..._..,· 5 -hi. c.,,) ; . - [Jc.-·.)·!;? i -• .., -'.li ;-.~--\-"'.1Ivq-,. tD f,;ru. rl0v.1l~s" z ~ lf IA./ _) ·- 42> . J ... ·<: ~c.-.,..,,-. i!!;,r,, ' ! J_S--,f;..~ . / ort-,;.\ ,.,,. ,-.A l"'iov ,., f, ,I <;;.O\Co, ,, -(' bf -f'a..,c... -. ... .,., \ ··-~-:_::,.-;--_.' ._ .. . -. . ..• .,_,• '1l n,,, jA \ .. .. I It 10 flloc.,<-)..)L. . \Zi.,,N P\Uv,v, f\ --- HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC '1/G ,: '°' io Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in PhysiologicaVreproductive adaptations Y. areas of prolonged inundation/saturation __ Wetland plant database --- Morphological adaptations i .. »,•~.5,tJ ~J' .. : ... yZPersonal knowledge of regional plant communities -- Technical Literature · · r:-· Other (exolain) · Hydrophytic vegetat_ion present? ryes') no Rationale for decision/Remarks: 90,,,-,, •~l~ o+-'v-y~rop/·1 ! '· v0 C t,d ' ,v, Bv1t ,e<o.e)2 ,-H~ ; HYDROLOGY ' . Is it the growing season? G) no Water Marks: yes 0) Sediment Deposits: yes ~; · on _, Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yeslilo Drainage Patterns: yes ltlb . / other /exolain) l<>=I c' . j .;;t...___ Dept. of inundation: -inches Oxidized Root (live roo~ Local Soil Survey: yes fo-i -- Channels <12 in. ves _1.J Depth to free water in pit: l.!L inches FAC Neutral: ® no Water-stained Le~ves yes{~ Depth to saturated soil: t l '!> inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other ( explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: --Pl'«.e.,...._1 n.....,_-d...-,f (':'1,f_,.ftf1 f'., -,,{.,,_,:;f~; Aerial ohoto2raohs: Other: ..,,,,...((:~ .. _. _J. /A..,, {J -I -.. !iJ . Wetland hydrology present? 4fY no I Rationale for decision/Remarks: ~A"f l,11. ~ Aw-i,,"',La, •Q.r\>... \ 1~,·L so\'.> i..-,rly VIZ,,~(r:i._rtr\ t,,/< ..i 1 •• -~ ~7J,o\o'\'1 '--./....~ ,::, ::,,<Y.J, .-t,./2 ' al , -f~<--, 1 <1 v-t'r,J. --r~ I 'I SOILS Map Unit Name --'BLIL"'t-'1 "-~t...,I, ff-'-£~.,,_,,._ • ...,$,..•""""""","1--"(o-"'"--""'-''-'-"-' (Series & Phase) Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors (inches) (Munsell (Munsell moist) moist) ~-.., A, IO'f1Z. "3 (, - I.( -,ia ... A2 1•'1i. "·'"/~ - Hydric Soil Indicators: ( check all that apply) Histosol -- __ Histic Epipedon --Sulfidic Odor __ Aquic Moisture Regime __ Reducing Conditions GI eyed or Low-Chroma (=I) matrix Hydric soils present? yes 6) Rationale for decision/Remarks: .._..:,:::;:....:~=--=., Drainage Class lud/ P=.-.'-~ o+-.:JS-LI Field observations confim1 Yes ma ed e? Mottle abundance -Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil size & contrast structure, etc. profile (match descriQtion) -j~'-- -~SL. --Matrix chroma $ 2 with mottles --- __ Mg or Fe Concretions __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Listed on NationaVLocal Hydric Soils List Other (exolain in remarks) 1-J. "-yJl~ . c... ~er."( .' ,,..J._' CA.'.l; or-s r~~ Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? yes ~ fv Hydric soils present? yes Is the sampling point yes Wetland hvdrolo<>v present? yes ~ within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: NOTES: ,..,p(c....,.,_.Q._ , "'- Revised 4/97 Project/Site: •5 ,T ,e.. c... Applicant/owner: ,· Jnvestigator(s): P.T ...... 1.-r DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or · 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual1 " UA .• j/L.11~ ·Date: 1,/t--f•y County: /,::.,,n.j State: ""'A> S/T/R: :2.C--,-.. 'f.N ~ctr, Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? @' no Community ID: vp lM-ief Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? r/1j Transect ID: l.C-!t C,-~) yes Is the area a potential Problem Aiea? yes 'lfi1" Plot ID: ).. ~ _·;) Explanation of atvPical or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum % cover Indicator ·r-~ .. , ... · \ J ....... -~ 'j,1 14' L $ rtt.,, / . ~.;.I;;~ -. -. j ... r.1~1 ? l> S--., ~ ' j 17(..__t...._., I 11.... (.,Q tcr:ta.. I+ 'Ls .f-c.., f.,n.li,S ,_,._ .. £h -,-r-.fo...e.... -.j I . ' • I\~,. G.,.... ?< r ~o=-t" ...... -t\ 1. 0 '" I' I..L.-7 0 cJ,o,-4..rj c "..J.,-.t-fl, ·~ f .u..v I' I To..a,t.A.C "t"""~ .Jvl-,.r# I.\ ,o ,J...--+ t:,,"\.is~vs t' e,.,-I,"' s 1.r-UL HYDROPHYTIC fEGETATION INDICATORS: . © 12.v-.C.. .io-. ,,.., af s .• + -pfot-) % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC J.((;" = '1. o"lo Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations :::z areas of prolonged inundation/saturation --Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations --Personal knowledge of regional plant communities -- Technical Literature Other /exolain\ Hydrophytic vegetation present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks: HYDROLOGY ' Is it the growing season? @ no Water Marks: yes i(6) Sediment Deposits: yes e, on Based on: soil temp (record temp \ Drift Lines: yes '® Drainage Patterns: yes IQ t/ other (explain) lood d. i....ct'I' cfl. .-kt-/ Dept. of inundation: ~inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes ~ Channels < 12 in. ves ,(ii) Depth to free water in pit: ~inches F AC Neutral: yes n6 Water-stained Leaves yes ~ Depth to saturated soil: .2.!lL inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: -- Aerial ohotograohs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? yes <!P Rationale for decision/Remarks: or{' ....,L l·rd ,.. lo".,<( I" ~ .. -Ji' e.cCtc.,... J ~ , +; • ' .,.,._ ... <!.d/_ 'i,./:e, (. 7 #"'-'O ,-...rl-<i 'fr ....... r.,. ~ - I SOILS- Map Unit Name 1'0 '( 4 11,'f £,. ,. 'i"=>"R, (Series & Phase) loO-#v -I 'Pto+ 73P.:::r IA Drainage Class ~(l J. fl&!»-£ rolk Field observations confirm e? Yes ~ ~ Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture 1 concretions~ Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size & contrast structure, etc. profile moist) moist) (match descri12tion) o-~ ~ 10 'tf ?Ji, .--........ s ... L-- it' 1s--r J, "1 l.5' 1 Jlz. --G ')~L -' Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) --Histosol ~ Matrix chroma $ 2 with mottles __ Histic Epipedon __ Mg or Fe Concretions --Sulfidic Odor __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Aguie Moisture Regime __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Reducing Conditions __ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=l) matrix Other (explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? yes ~ Rationale for decision/Remarks: Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? {;e,;i no & Hydric soils present? yes PnB Is the sampling point yes Wetland hvdrolo!!V oresent? ves 0 within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: flo-f )..oe~ ~{;\\~\\ '\-~•€£-Cf-tef·" U'i./1} ·_) -rl ve {'V/'e 11 o-t o.J ;+l, :,i L W<'_ -+r "~ I( Revised 4/97 ·,r ,1{ ~ /' ~ DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) Project/Site: 'J(f:0;~(.i~k. VI."' ;+ {_,..- Applicant/owner: lnvestigator(s): MA. P,1 . Do Nonna! Circumstances exist on the site? GP no ls the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? aw' ls the area a potential Problem Aiea? yes MP' Exolanation of atvoical or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Date: 1 t/t/ocf. County: J,C~, State: v',t, SITIR: 7;. ,i_~µ 'i!..z/~ Community fD: f> "$ S Transect JD: C-1 Plot ID: ·BB ,4-c~-1) Stratum % cover Indicator 1,hl,\,~ Pl; ti'.{ Vl 0 •-" C.IN-, s {;f) fr.z..,-.,/ / J.," I< u.~,fe," 1 SD .c.. -() ""'"l'"'\ I ViJr;,.c,( <ov:u,._ s w l&-c....., r%...i.v; ~ "f • nJ. '<•1ct,,. lV 15 (l , u,../ S"\'i '/. c: tc.L ,i, 1 4 1 .('a.c:..,l<./ HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC 66 Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in PhysiologicaVreproductive adaptations -- areas of prolonged inundation/saturation --Wetland plant database ,,L=- Morphological adaptations --Personal knowledge of regional plant communities -- Technical Literature --Other ( exolain l Hydrophytic vegetation present? CV no Rationale for decision/Remarks: HYDROLOGY /) / ls it the growing season? ® no Water Marks: yes 6w' Sediment Deposits: yes (l!O on - Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes G,.( Drainage Patterns: ye$" ru>' v other (explain) lo--~ c,(,~~« h Dept. of inundation: -=-inches Oxidized Root (live ro~,1 Local Soil Survey: yes /119 ..2JL inches Channels <12 in. ves .Jlef / .. Depth to free water in pit: FAC Neutral: yest9 Water-stained Leaves ye(no Depth to saturated soil: ...:zainches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: -- Aerial ohotographs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? yes n Rationale for decision/Remarks: N. s'l'\"5 ,J( ·fa'f_\.\ '" ·>, h1)1,(1?'1 -= -I - I I I I I SOILS ,n r l ""-<I,,. Map Unit Name r,,7.11.f ""'"e.-~ _ (Series & Phase) Drainage Class U,;11,(l Jl ,,.,1,, ., *' Field observations confim1 Yes ,~ Profile Description - . Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture) concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size & contrast structure, etc. profile moist\ moist) (match descri(ltion) Cr'\ ·Pr-IP 'f( 1-/1~ --·, ~ i-l\\-~t-10'ff1y/i IQ yf ~It i41 • l'.v\"' , COl>IIIVI s·,L-- ' I ' Hydric Soil Indicators: ( check all that apply) 1 Matrix chroma ::; 2 with mottles --Histosol __ Histic Epipedon __ Mg or Fe Concretions --Sulfidic Odor _·_ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Aguie Moisture Regime __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Reducing Conditions ,,' __ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma (;J) matrix Other (exolain in remarks) Hydric soils present? ® no Rationale for decision/Remarks: l,.oJ c\.-vo1,,.,.._ "'"J\ l'viQttle~ \no\: C 0~ k~),:(.... 5o-, Is Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soils present? Wetland hvdro]o1>v oresent? Rationale/Remarks: ~l 9-\-t\\) NOTES: 11'.)lW\(~. ~ !( 'fh"t.C r<) ~ no no \ no , C-{ ::\-t( i "' 8 ls the sampling point no within a wetland? ov,A '1 ~ tl.-v~fo-1 (_ i,J ;--11 .. :' "'1 " we --1 L,. "J Revised 4/97 :j i.t: ~ Project/Site: s« r:" 'tJ( ()o K Applicant/owner: J DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) \A n 'i-\-(__., Date: l \/)/O ~ County; ii(.~ i,,. J State; ..,.1 f'r lnvesti ~ator( s ); 'F'. -r ""'-l -tu . ..:,,·-SrTJR; "<.1'. TZ-'!,/./, t g:/ t:' Do Normal Circumstanceslixist on'the site? CY"" no Community JD; r PU . Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes SB, Transect JD; C,-1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes Plot ID; 515 tJ \ (c-1) Explanation of atvoical or problem area; VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) .£: Doffi\~~~t Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator -f, ,,J ,. I l,,,[,~i..,,:,h.r" . -ql) .( .... c.., ';:::J ' '15 r,,, .. ;_,,,i; C..n ,;; (.ei,... 7 L ... J C,p;(e._g, A o"'J .,; : .::; L{ ') L .. , • / ~ f<.,. w-J/11'-/ te,4-,,.~ .... ) ~- \\-----t"-Llv ~.L .......... V,(..L.-o. \. (,, v, 12, >,; ~ ' HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of domina~ts 0BL, FACW, & FAC \ E>-0 Check all indicators that apply & explain below; Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations ~ areas bf pro.longed inundation/saruration --Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations Personal knowledge of regional plant communities -- Technical Literature -c·.-,.() Other ( exolain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? 6~--/ no Rationale for decision/Remarks: Y, . i .. c1 k '/),/( ~-r! ( tie) e,~ tA j ', --a~-"\ t)""l·\,'.(1,. \..."(__ \ HYDROLOGY c9 ls it the growing season? no Water Marks; yes CJ' Sediment Deposits: yes diii-' on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines; yes~ Drainage Patterns: yes /(ii) ,/ other (explain) f.,, 1 • ..l r I , ••• ,t,L .[,.-h. Dept. of inundation: _:::_inches Oxidized Root (live ro~ Local Soil Survey: yes CJ , Channels <12 in. yes n I I I I I Depth to free water in pit; ~inches FAC Neutral: ~ 'no Water-stained Leaves yes~ I Depth to saturated soil: ....21.B.. inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other ( explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: --'fl.pl ' (., ( \ Aerial photo2raphs: Other; ..:;,o· S I Wetland hydrology present? (Y_"_Y no Rationale for decision/Remarks: '--" ~-1 ,n .nk .. f ,_ \ .\ ../iA e. A ' 'o"' ~,,,).. v1 1).,. t ~Q;\~ \ -~ ,Ln-\('._ l,.,e+l • .., ~ kvJ1c; I Ji '1 I ' ' I , - SOILS Map Unit Name IYOc:J,,.,,,; He.. s,·1:t l•o..w, (Series & Phase) Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors (inches) (Munsell (Munsell moist) moist) 0-/bt ,1 IO 'I f:. '{/2. 7.r' I/!'-$(~ -' . ., , .. . Hydric Soil Indicators: ( check all that apply) Histosol -- __ Histic Epipedon Sulfidic Odor -- __ Aquic Moisture Regime __ Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=I) matrix Hydric soils present? @ no Rationale for decision/Rem~ t-:, --c,,l... '" vl4 -............ ,i...... rr,e_,:,.,,,,,, o-e We,-\(~J2 So,'/, Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ~ no Hydric soils present? ~ no Wetland hvdro]ogy oresent? no Rationale/Remarks: Cl-II -,(.. ~......_ C!..n·-t e.r-, v--"""-R..... F" c;,..,.,d . NOTES: -I -I Drainage Class 'Poor-~ 0~,., J Field observations confirm Yes No e? Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil size & contrast structure, etc. profile (match descri12tion) "1"-"'"f /, AL ,fl"UIIII~ • S tlt1 Io <I.,"' ·; Matrix chroma $ 2 with mottles __ Mg or Fe Concretions __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Other ( exolain in remarks) o-1 -~.,,,,g,,c /J,._f,.,r..,_. J'S . -d ,u,;t; ,/ e. ,-( Is the sampling point tfjp no within a wetland? Ro_ S"'->-t.~ !.,aa-, IJ YI -I s f.,v;-/t..{., "'-,,._ ..,d(J / Revised 4/97 .\. Project/Site: Vi,, ,'t,c__ ' Applicant/owner: . DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Deline·ation Manual or . 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) Investieator/s): ~".'f"o,,,J.,,,r M ~0#11,IL.t&Ao. Do Nonnal Circumstanc~ exist on the site? W no Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical siruation)? yes ~ Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes Exolanation of atypical or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Date: 10 1'2-(ofo, County: t,;-' vj State: v..-9(. S/J/R: Z.-'i T 7_-;J.). 12.'-t e Communit)"!D: f".f O Tran sect ID: l C, ~ l ) Plot JD: .,., _ I Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum o/o cover Indicator Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum 0/o cover Indicator f>"'"1.,,{vj bl<-\ <&L.,, J.;_~ t>--T '/0 ft></ ' <~ t:_,.; "', (-C-d,,. .a,,,/ s i <. :,-r;o ~a..u,./ So.~ J. ~"' I • ,; ;", s '-1 0 ~ V ,,. ' J • r,'. A·cl"\v", 1 C II"· e_.1r1. s ,. I (5 -fuvJ. 1,,1.d "'!> L, '; ,-:, fl 'JO 11/:L . I fjLL-,....~Lr, c A.-~ 'ntt-t:.P +l 1-~ HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC 'if c-"' ~ lo Check all indicators that.apply & explain beiow: Visual observation of plant species gro"".in_g in Physiological/reproductive adaptations -:;r areas of prolonged inundationlsaruration --· Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations Personal knowledge of regional plant communities -- Technical Literature ·v Other (exolain) . Hydrophytic vegetation present? ~ no Rationale for decision/Remarks: J-?e:,a"f-t:f..,,1. -o V'\ , ::, .Jt .... ' ...,._ i" k. b7 l-f "'f~/ C-sf" CJ "24 • HYDROLOGY Is .it the growing season? @ no Water Marks: yes ~ Sediment Deposits: yes '19' on Based on: soil temp (record temp · ) Drift Lines: yes ~ Drainage Patterns: yes & / other (exolain\ la--l .,.. ,.; • ..:.t:'<'.,---J • .-l-u., Dept. of inundation: · :.' -· inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Channels < 12 in. ves (ll(J) Local Soil~urvey: yes '!6-1 Depth to free water in pit: ..2Jk.. inches FAC Neutral: (!j) no Water-stained Leaves(xos no Depth to saturated soil: -21:l,_ inches Check all that apply & explain below: · Other (explain): of. /~ Stream, Lake or gage data: --~~u:.f'7~·"'-t4" -p<*,-hJ""- 1 «pr Jo~,-~ . p Aerial photographs: . ~ ;.. Other: . ,;.JJ ..o'+c,l i<> s,,_,+" r AAI!!) C•. Ji,'-f. ~"' <, • Wetland hydrology present?,.:· <!Y-no I Rationale for decision/Reimlrl!IS, ~ . 7:::) r "/(1, -.,.,._,-,.f.;,.._~ :.~'1!{~t~·/ ,,: ·, S ," :Sv"'-1 <'k-/ /,r~ v-;-l... r"" $ a.,, Lv_ , pf ,.~d. L .... v ..... .w..-·v~1 ··~;.1:~·J;C.. J,-tl..ii_ ,~J?..5c.-<"'-'b..o j>c,<;-,,o·...-, . - . · .. ·.· :. · 7:"-·';. ~i• .,)L> ! {)<., 1 IA,, . ti" J, i=-54 'a /"'-A .,f' ' ·. I 1 -brr 111 /pc.. . ,Pl,,,. {c,~Xff\ ,;-,--, .. , 5""' -zo 5, .• , .'lo' . I I SOILS Map Unit Name jl'6k.csJY:1$k. S1' It (.,,,_,..,._ (Series & Phase) Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors (inches) (Munsell (Munsell moist) moist) 0 -lift A 1oyt2. 'f/o1, tojR3/(p Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) --Histosol __ Histic Epipedon --Sulfidic Odor __ Aguie Moisture Regime _,._··_ Reducing Conditions GI eyed or Low-Chroma (= 1) matrix Hydric soils present? CS no Rationale for decision/Remarks. · 1.-•-c,t.....-.,. ....... "-" ......,-..,"'t"rix , ...... ~ .... ttl., <; Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ~ no Hydric soils present? no Wetland hvdroloav oresent? ryes) no Rationale/Remarks: A.u..(..,, ....u. 3 -i,.d le-,, d. 1 h d; r,:Jvvr NOTES: • o+-::/F3 Drainage Class Paocfy e{ftA../1/\c:J.. Field observations confim1 Yes No ma ed e? Mottle abundance Texture 1 concretions 1 Drawing of soil size & contrast structure, etc. profile ( match descri11tion) IYlCUJY, 'Yl<.c/i '-'rn Si f'J cl~ /o,:un pf" Ofl'll '1,,,.. T / Matrix chroma s 2 with mottles __ Mg or Fe Concretions __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Other (explain in remarks) .. < ,·_of.,',=,a...1,v'L o.f yr,c.. ,;., 1 t; • Is the sampling point ® no within a wetland? 7l:,.R.. ~r/lL /oe.&<7 iiJ r,. ,s ....,, 'fl..1 ri ll.-/,<~:ti ,i..,.,/, Revised 4/97 Project/Site: · Sf,-f".J brocl< Applicant/owner: DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Con,s Wetland Delineation Manual) -Uhi./-_'3 Date: lo/:zc/c<I- County: K, "J State: WA · lnvestigator(s): a fh I I tTWau-..-, /YI. 8u ... ke,, le ~ SfT/R: "1 '5 T Z '2..U, Pu I;'" Do Normal Circumstances exist on .the site? (§ no Community ID: pfo Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation}? yes C®, Transect ID: Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes ~ Plot ID: fMf ti .3 1,,._,.d,.o,,,.J,;_ ~-'Z. Exolanation of atvnical or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine} Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum %~ cover Indicator s ... 1\1' J,c.:1 ... ii-..~. -*" go IV~ 14.,, ..... ~ Jt'1 T '~,.,.i,l '>\'. s 'ii +a..c,u.,, r.-....... .., <" _,,#_.lilt..., 't -ti io ,flr>...c,w 'Pke...l" .. ,,. ,. ,..,_J,·~ . -'I ~·-. .. ,J --• v 111 .... -z.o 12-·-- I &'-. ;.,, p,) If d.0 -., .. HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC 3 /1/ :; 7 '5 ~o Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual obselvation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations --::;, areas of prolonged inundation/saturation --Wetland plant database ~ Morphological adaptations 7 Personal knowledge ofregional plant communities -- Technical Literature Other /exolain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ~ no Rationale for decision/Remarks: Y--r-r·t.e-V¥"-*·•"' I", ,,t,,..,.,......,J ~ ,"-1· HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? €)· no Water Marks: yes no Sediment Deposits: yes no on Based on: soil temp (record temp } Drift Lines: yes no Drainage Patterns: yes no ._/ other ( explain) ,. <-«.I c::.l, .,i,.... ) ,ck. Dept. of inundation: +inches Oxidized Root (live roots} Local Soil Survey: yes no Channels <12 in. ves no Depth to free water in pit: __k__ inches F AC Neutral: yes no Water-stained Leavesdg) no Depth to saturated soil: &. inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain}: Stream, Lake or gage data: -- Aerial ohotograohs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? ( yes) no Rationale for decision/Remarks: <;c;fa.,r oJe rj_ [iri/s-...... .«t-+ -rJ,.,,_ 1-V ,e,-,-{~ ~·/"Jj l!,,r, 1-/,eri'o n,. ., I I I I I . I I I I SOILS Map Unit Name S11,ob•i11,•S'z~ ~, l-t lo"'-IM.. (Series & Phase) Taxonom ,'c.., ilv Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors (inches) (Munsell (Munsell moist) moist) 0-/th A 1oy12. 'f/z 7 5'/!Z 4/t.. Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) __ -_ Histosol __ Histic Epipedon --·-Sulfidic Odor . Aquic Moisture Regime --:;r Reducing Conditions .. Gleyed or Low-Chroma(=!) matrix Hydric soils present? @ no Rationale for decision/Remarks: Drainage Class fu,-(~ JN.in"1J Field observations confim1 Yes e? No Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil size & contrast structure, etc. profile (match descri11tion) ln~ny, rn<:-e/iun,, s ;(+1 e,(°'1 prominu,f _.:!_ Matrix chroma ~ 2 with mottles __ Mg or Fe Concretions __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Other (explain in remarks) oxiclizec/ rh·1zopher~J re. c.liuin_J conditions., m,:,f-ri~ cl,rcm"'-~"' "(II mo-ff/es Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ~ no ® Hydric soils present? no ls the sampling point no Wetland hydrolo!!V present? (yes) no within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: ""\ l 3 CJ-.r,'te..,-, ...... "-r<-,~.~~r'-lou.:f,ovt /<;, l;i A-(P,l,;rf-J, dcfresslor, +h~f ho/els {A)al-er i shrub cont>p/ c/oetn'-1-.._f/Dw Vl'Je lz, fw,1 lo /qrow )n half of' !'!of-_ ~TES: Revised 4/97 Project/Site: S1111· r:Jbrook - Applicant/owner: [nvestiRator(s): fl. 1/,,l/owav, DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) l/111 f B M, 6orfmk-am/J· Do Nonna! Circumstances exist on the site? , (fa' no Date: lojwjof County: J:;nJ State: t,v,q. S/T/R: .., 5 Tz.-z_,, ~q/z Community ID: pss·' Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes @ Transect ID: ls the area a potential Problem Area? yes eJ Plot ID: P/of-• z ,~,.,,.,,J ij ~z. Explanation of atvoical or oroblem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H ,; herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum 0/o cover Indicator s ... i.)' lvc,i<l"' II"-<"· 'I<' ,.., ; t...s;._J,.. .. s 80 .f....u,.,-\: ') .;:: s Cor-hV.!, c.n ..... j,. D.h. ..... ' 2ll ~v-' Pka.,l,.1,;, (l..N" C, -t • A• H 60. l~c,[µ' bare qrovnd. II so -- HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: %ofdominants0BL,FACW,&FAC ?,/:, -:-100'1. Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in · Physiological/reproductive adaptations / areas of prolonged inundation/saturation --Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations --Personal knowledge of regional plant corrununities ,/ -- Technical Literature Other ( exolain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ('yes') no • Rationale for decision/Remarks: j)_ V<-()~1.al'-:.., d 0"""1'h-..-tl by ~ror'fJC.. <;,f='~ HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? ® no Water Marks: CJ§?) no Sediment Deposits: yes(iiD on Based on: soil temp (record temp 1 Drift Lines: yes(§:) Drainage Patterns: @no j/ other (explain) toe£..! e,\,K.o\..._1e da..- Dept. of inundation: _J!..._ inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes no Channels <J 2 in. yes no Depth to free water in pit: _:lrtinches F AC Neutral: . yes no Water-stained Leave~o Depth to saturated soil: I'+ inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: -- Aerial ohotoPTaphs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? ~ no Rationale for decision/Remarks: '--. drc,1 n,,J<'/s w,,fe in rr,id,//e of rt~f i Soi I~ a.r< r; "ffHr ,.fed ~ SOILS M U . N ,,. ' L. '",' l;-\ou..." -ap mt ame CJN> IN> M t'i> :a,. __ =- (Series & Phase) Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors (inches) (Munsell (Munsell moist) moist) 0 -/'f-1 A-/0 y"/2. tf-/2 toytz. s;,g loy11. </-/1,, Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) --Histosol __ . _ Histic Epipedon Sulfidic Odor -- 7Rquic Moisture Regime __ Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=I) matrix Hydric soils present? @D no Rationale for decision/Remarks: '/ -o-f zf :1_ Drainage Class Paor-l7 Jn,j.,.Q Field observations confim1 Yes @ ma ed e? Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil size & contrast structure, etc. profile . (match descri12tion) Common, -f:.ine, Si/Ii, clay pr<'m1·ner, I- Cotnn-,on, Ant::. pra,n, n~ nf / Matrix chroma :<:: 2 with mottles __ Mg or Fe Concretions __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Other (explain in remarks) ,n a-l-ri ;,( chroma. ~ .2 wdh rnoH/e, M~ ,4. i,.,.,J r{ c... ,;.o.' I (!,n'-1 c.ri' <lr.. -' r Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? @) no Hydric soils present? ·(§) no Is the sampling point ® no Wetland hvdroloav oresent? ('"y2, no within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: Jn,-d,; ,.I( ~ ind;c,,-for, frr ""-Wf'flond. -,i,.,._, s°'"""f 112.-[ 0 c.a:;1: j O /\, ,s ""i'tt.. J }'\. tl- (.),) ..{.,'"t:lev..-. ~ • NOTES: Revised 4/97 --.... . Project/Site: 5:t,11:Jbr-,ok-Onif Applicant/owner: DATA FORM 1 (Revised) ""· Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) B Date: /oj 2 o/t></- County: I<; n .J State: w.4. Investigator(s): 13. llo!lt,n-a v P. fO;,h,:r, M. lh,fen, M. &cku,l~._,n Sff/R: 2.-~ T z. -.,µ. ~<fl! Do Nonna( Circumstances exist on the 'Slte? ® no I Community ID: Pt9-{ ,, Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes ® Transect ID: Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes @ Plot ID: !'lo~ ., I J ~ E-T.. Explanation of atvoical or oroblem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator -'I' I+ 85 -t<'--C.. µ./ p k le..,; s j(. rw-..,,1, ",, ,,,. ~pt..,,. /,._-f :{o t,v # It; '-· 1} 'o l ' ~I-. C,4n.,.,;. · i>'1.r,s, <Af • "'-tt !5 ,,. ••J ·' . ' . r .......... 1,i/,, .. , , -~1 IJWL, 1-\ ,-Nt- J . HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC t /i ~ lb<)-€),, Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in / Physiological/reproductive adaptations --areas of prolonged inundation/saturation --Wetland plant database _L.._ Morphological adaptations --Personal knowledge of regional plant communities . / Technical Literature Other ( explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? (§ no Rationale for decision/Remarks: h'j drt>pl?J h C V<j efqf ,,:in ,, clornioa nf HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? ® no Water Marks: yes @) Sediment Deposits: yes@ on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes ® Drainage Patterns: ye~ ,/ other (exolain) w=' ct ...... ..;-._ J ~ Dept. of inundation: ~inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes no Channels <J 2 in. yes no Depth to free water in pit: 7 inches F AC Neutral: yes no Water-stained Leaves ye(§ Depth to saturated soil: _a_ inches J_a;:;.,·,,ft:J a!- Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: -- Aeri.al photographs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? ~ no Rationale for decision/Remarks: <;"o,/ ~~1lu1·i::drr:-f c>-/ ~ s-/.o n,,-( 111.3 u1a-ler ;,, f'' ,, 5u,·/arc · "" I ... ~ :_;:· . -,---' r· W~d r-c,-f SQILS 'Ptrrt :#,'I-;r - Map Unit Name Wo~J,n,,d/v <5, It l<'.la,,WL ~· . Drainage Class 'foor-17 &tJJ"'eL ~·--. " (Series & Phase) *· @ ;~· \.'X. jy-,, ·Huv"" v~S £I·· Field observations confirm No Taxonomv(subQToun) _::,-::_;. manned tvne? ' \ ' ; :/:::. Profile Description CC·.· ,:•:: Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abui'!(jance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size & con:tiast structure, et~. profile , moist) moist) (match descri12tion) 6-1+.j, A lo yrz 3/:z /,5/5/'t /'() ~· ii;ct,d. -la,< ·-~ -:~ ~, 51( t' t •"""--\ . ..,. Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) i/~atrix chroma :, 2 with mottles --Histosol __ Histic Epipedon --. Mg or Fe Concretions --Sulfidic Odor __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Aquic Moisture Regime __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Reducing Conditions __ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma (~ l) matrix Other (exolain in remarks) Hydric soils present? @) no Rationale for decision/Remarks: J'?( 1 C\A TJ_~ d...r.+fs Jvcz.rc«... o J.s~rv-dl · c.. ..... ~,...Ci"""""'-""""'-'1' I',')< w,'?L r-e,fo;,t. ie,<..,T vN.-1.. ,..,4-r:. r4.....-1,,.,t:f,,. ,:.., ,; ,:(5 e,r.'f12.r,o ,. Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? @ no Hydric soils present? @ no Is the sampling point @ no Wetland hvdro!ogy present? ~ no within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: --· / ,:; u,::f, • >1., , · µ.,r/4,',,, ,UA. 3 tvo/1 c,,,,,. ,J /M't IJ(,,' ~ s "'-'-1-. Tk s~rk.. I$ "'- W,{,,i"/,-..,...,j' • NOTES: Revised 4/97 ;,-r.-: . 1' : DATA FORM l;(Revised) Routine Wetland dtterll'iination ~·: .. · :--·-· (WA State Wetland Delif!~ati~'Manual or Bne .. . 1987 Corns Wetland De . ' . atibn Manual) Project/Site:· S,,n· Jbrodc i,0,.;k&-r. '· .i;,, Date: Jo/::it/0 f ~ .. ·:.;~--·· , ... if:··/:'·::/ Applicant/owner: .3;:~· . ,• County:/~ }\{~:'.):·: lnvestigator<s): {3 · ~~--?Vt.. /1 I I. State: w.4. ,,, Sff/R: "2. S' T.,, .... ..,,.,...,t! Do Nonna! Circumstances exist on the site? ctg) ·fie\--: Community lb: M'o ' '.' I Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes Glit,.· Transect ID: . Is the area a potentjarProblem Area? · · yes '<@· Plot.JD: f/gf ;Jt)t,v,,;;t!,,,.,,,,,Q '6-/ Exolanation of atvnical or oroblem area: \. .· .. VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = her~V:·= vine) -?-· . . :, Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant S~ecies Stratum % cover Indicator ':i $~ l..l', lad.Rf': vA/ -r ~ 11.'~ '~· _·.1.r"'-' 'lo (,R,_,c,u\ M;._;{s ' ,.;;~ ;,.,..de. . 1-1 15. -to..viv' . J t,,. -: ... 1 ~LJ<.. J-1. 85-.fa..c-.J ' -. I .•·a, . ' .. /··· HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION1NDICATORS: % of dominanis OBL, F ACW, & FAC 100% -z/v Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations _L areas of prolonged inundation/saturation --Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations -;7 Personal knowledge of regional plant communities -- Technical Literature Other ( exnlain) Hydropbytic vegetation present? ~-no Rationale for decision/Remarks: ll"S~' Q>"'-(,;,. ,R_" """ I .,,,j>,:,f2_ ~ yror71,~ .,,~..u, HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? @ no Water Marks: ~ no ~· · Sediment Deposits:d':0 no on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes no Drainage Patterns: yes no .....--other ( exnlain \ /,,c,u "(, """'""" ,. Dept. of inundation: -#-inches Oxidized Rooti~ots) Local Soil Survey: yes no ~inches Charuiels <12 i e no Depth to free water in pit: FACNeutral: yes no Water-stained Leaves yes no Depth to saturated soil: _{ji_ inches Check all that apply & explain below: Otl)er (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: .. -- Aerial ohotoeraphs: Other: .. Wetland hydrology present? ·c:3. no . • .. Rationale for decision/Remarks: •. I ,..,_,,Q • e,,C(} ,' Vt-o( ,.,_, fl,, ii~ ¥r•lo1;-sefb..,,,~ c9e.F~,ts ~ ,,_,a..t'2-<-......,,_,rl:.. ~ '.°ii?--rlZ-- :i:· {.?.· ~ v .. - • - SOILS r· 1: }i ·.,. £oorly dminJ Map Unit Name M/O<);lvllb' ll\/1., -5; It ~o~ ;fj·· . '\' Drainage Class ,,,· 0 (Series & Phase) '.~ ;::·· ·:,.:. Taxonomy (subgroup)-r,:;oiG--Vfvv,~9-v~~ fa'· .•. · Field observations confimi Yes @. ~,-..... - . /'/ <,: mapped tvne? ' V If_ ·.-: ,· Profile Description . Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle aburig~ce Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size & contrast. structure, et~. profile , moist) moist) (match descri12tion) ,:, o-;4t A /o Ji!! .f./::i. /0 'I I< <// I,, m =y, mf"1:c,i!Y1 1 d1sh~cl' Si 11-::J C (a.:J ll)a,n - -;· Hydric Soil Indicators: (checkall that apply) /lvlatrix chroma :s; 2 with mottles --Histosol __ Histic Epipedon __ Mg or Fe Concretions --Sulfidic Odor __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils =z Reducing Conditions __ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=l) matrix Other (explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? ~ no Rationale for decision/Remarks: f w..-t v ,-,:U. 1 JI C/t;f' I./,(,, o-f '7d r/ v 7(; 1 le.. l.o c,.,I c.,l,... '""' ....... .._ "cc:ls v,.,;~"'-. f'e.i '!}< 1'\, I' e. Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? GI) no ~· Hydric soils present? ~ no Is the sampling point no Wetland hvdrolollV present? ~ no within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: ~r1;;: (o:,~/o"" ' v<X-/7~ ..;..,,..,. J.; c..--...Mrr s ~ . ~ I _s µ,( 5 l,,\/ ,'1k.1't\. ,._ ...., .ct I C(,,y, I . NOTES: Revised 4/97 l =-. J_. DATA FORM ly:"(Revised) Routine Wetland )ltermi'!,~tion (WA State Wetland Deli~atief~;Manual or 1987 Corns Wetland Deft'peano'n Manual) Date: ;o/~•/ o'f- County: ,C,;"1, \ State: WA. / :::~:,:, :+ ~k= ~ l,' SrTIR: Z...5, TZ--..V -,z.ye Do Nonna! Circumstances exisf on the site? @ nil).• Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? • yes ~.·.·.· •.. ·.• .• Community ID: WttftUld .fl. B ,-/ Transect ID: Is the area a potentjal ·Problem Area? yes ~ Plot-ID: Plof ,#3, .. Exolanation of atypical or problem area: ... VEGETATION · (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = her1i,-'V,=vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator i~ /v,;,;,i,>, '1«---'f:" ...-.: jL(,/ ,.,.,..J 1"·~ -,-"! 0 (-fuc.-vk) A.I .,ue_ r·...,·b.-.... -t 5 /5 +a...c- ,,. ... S. Ir= -h...c,i,..1 C:dr"""·.-~ ,...; r. rt!""-' fc} ~---ft -71" -- HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominanis OBL, FACW, & FAC o/2--::. I oo1o Check all indicators that apply & explain below: :{ i, Dominant Plant s;ecies .. . . ·. Stratum 1,.,.....-- ' Physiological/reproductive adaptations Wetland plant database % cover Visual observation of plant species growing in areas of prolonged inundation/saturation Morphological adaptations Technical Literature Personal knowledge of regional plant communities Other ( exolain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Rationale for decision/Remarks: 8, no L.1'%£ .,.,.,_"tl.,x... •'S c(.,,><-i;""'-'••.( HYDROLOGY Indicator Is it the growing season? no Water Marks: ~ no on +oc I!":? -· Sediment Deposits: . yes no Based on: --~-soil temp (record temp ____ } v' Other (exp]ain) /q<.LI 'I -.._ JJ~ Dept. of inundation: _!/_ inches ,, ' Depth to free water in pit: _2Ml..: inches Depth to saturated soil: ....-.:r-inches Check all that apply & explain below: Stream, Lake or gage dala: __ Aerial oho102raohs: Wetland hydrology present? Rationale for decision/Remarks: s----"· ,..,~i w .; • : ls -...1!. ~ ... ...a., '" ,-+ ( c,~ J7 ,. ·o -~ / o,,. ., f " . Other: no Drift Lines: yes no Oxidized Root (li~ots) Channels <12 intvev no FACNeutral: yes no . Otl)er (explain): . Drainage Patterns: yes no Local Soil Survey: yes no Water-stained LeaveQ9' no SOILS Map unit Name ..,s"-"'tV<,.,_.\., .. ·,,"-"M""-'-l'"'&~b.~~s~~~lt:..._~1 e:r_ .... '-'-""-'-"' (Series & Phase) Taxonom Prnfile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors (inches) (Munsell (Munsell moist\ moist) 0-J<f+ 4 Jo yn3/:J 16 yrz. 'ff<,, Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) _2$__ Histosol ----6--Histic Epipedon _6_ Sulfidic Odor -2;,--Aquic Moisture Regime __ Reducing Conditions x Gleyed or Low-Chroma (~l) matrix Hydric soils present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks: (-6-1 Drainage Class fo ,.rj,f J t"R.i yi,1 J Field observations confim1 Yes ma ed e? Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil size & contrast structure, etc. profile (match descri11tion) Common, Rrie. ~illy c/4 y/oa., pr O>ni rien f / Matrix chroma :S 2 with mottles ---2$__ Mg or Fe Concretions ----2S_ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils _x_ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ '?_ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Other ( explain in remarks) C)Xidiud roof cJ,o.nn•lr, red u cJ':.J c~n c(;{ion51 /cvv t,,hroma. w/ mofles Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? @::, no Hydric soils present? @ no Is the sampling point @) no Wetland hvdrolo!!°V present? ~ no within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: /Ylt cl, ,,_ II 3 v<)(!f I a.n d. indico hrr. NOTES: Revised 4/97 r l DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corns Wetland Delineation Manual) Project/Site: ';;f,,.,'n_J brook -ll.hi+ 8. Applicant/owner: lnvesti2ator(s): /3. /-lo lfow«'(. M, /!,o,:,f< ~ r, l., ,.,r::, . Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? r yes-) no Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes (no) Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes GD Explanation of atvnical or oroblem area: VEGETATION · (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) , Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species ., .)y (;,,, lob, v~ , I I •.,t..,;. R -.,o Ob I c;,J_,.,... /..::.-1' c;/.,, . f\l 0.,u-I o...k i{Q { I e,,., -i II 20. obi ' ' ' ,¥-JS /Joi, 1Qf'>/un, persl ,,.; .. /.J 4,e,(/J -* fo/qr.,ooum Ji.Jnp•puo1J,, iJ 'JO obi -. ~ ~ • ,;;, I J I.,, -.•. v 3o -G:.c.,+ ...- J.\d(.J j<,<,,v<. e\,(,t,~[ ~,.. s 1re1Ce.. J./ I HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC ~f h~ 1rao;1<) Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Date: /6/;;,.o/c't County: /C ".:! Stale: WA- SIT JR: "2.&. . TZ '2. JV Community ID: f 61-{. Transect ID: (.1./C(t...A..t.,.,,r:, Plot ID: f/o.f "d Stratum % cover X T lo Visual observation of plant species growing in PhysiologicaVreproductive adaptations areas of prolonged inundation/saturation ..x-. Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations X Personal knowledge of regional plant communities )( Technical Literature Other I exolain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Rationale for decision/Remarks: ~ no 1~o1,vp~ft< I'~ /,,.J,o-ri ,s dPminaAI- HYDROLOGY lV·{t°: 8-( Indicator {,., vA + -- Is it the growing season? ® no Water Marks: a§!::; no Sediment Deposits: ye~ on s!t.rwbs i:J gindle, Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes® Drainage Patterns: yes@) V' other (exolain) •~<•) c..l,.,,,,.u. ~ Dept. of inundation: -f!.-inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes no Charu1els <12 in. yes no ·q Depth to free water in pit: ZlJ![!.. inches FAC Neutral: yes no Water-stained Leaves ye@ Depth to saturated soil: _J_Q_'._ inches ' Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: -- Aerial ohoto2raohs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? CE!> no Rationale for decision/Remarks: ,-f. 6f <;afurafe cl soils a,,,J. ~-preGwn'-'" '<.,e<--fe r M V" 4 A.~<, I .,._ ,f ,' c. /Ct lk,- ~ i SOILS Map Unit Name ";m,o k..:ol'.'1J d,, Sf h: ~ (Series & Phase) Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors (inches) (Munsell (Munsell moist) moist) O -II A, /Of P-</-/ 2. 7 Syt<. 4/1,, ' 1/-t •! Ii 2-7. 5(R5/z 7 c; / 12_ 5 /r, Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol -- __ Histic Epipedon _L...._ Sulfidic Odor __ Aquic Moisture Regime Reducing Conditions ./, ~ Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=I) matrix Hydric soils present? <§') no Rationale for decision/Remarks: ~ "' lff-W-~""-M a..:1,.-,· X. . I Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ~ no Hydric soils present? ~ no Wetland hvdrolo<>v present? ,VeS) no Rationale/Remarks: lvv-vl,_ µ) 3 .,,:.,,, d> ('.., ... fun f, "' NOTES: Drainage Class :B,,,r 7 ,.(,.... ,y1,e.£ Field obse.rvations confim1 Yes No ma ed e? Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil size & contrast structure, etc. profile (match descrigtion) ·T)-1.:::,>41' -f; ne 1 ,: \-t I """"'-cl i ,f-i 11 c-t fYJQ,)y_. C'. oo~·se 1 .' d<·S-ft I'\,: .l r7 i' l't l...__, __L_ Matrix chroma :,; 2 with mottles _L...._ Mg or Fe Concretions ___x_ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils _x_ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Other (exolain in remarks) ll1 ,,_ fr, x ~"rn « ~ :z ,,,, / ,.,.,,. tiler is the sampling point Cfes'.) no within a wetland? -<Adl ,,._,.., ,,J Revised 4/97 DATA FORM l (Revised). Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corns Wetland Delineation Manual) Project/Site: <;py;"Jbrook -Unf 8. Date: lo/ l"//o<f Applicant/owner: County: /(inJ State: WA lnvesti~ator(s): M: wdlu, /1,f. f3o~kui/camp, P. Toqher, /3. /+ol/owt1y Sff/R: 24. -T2. ~N °/<..~t. Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? --., ® . Community ID: i'EJ,f. , . no Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes (§) Transect ID: tv6,L..~ :B-{ Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes ~ Plot ID: JI./ . Explanation of atvnical or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover . Indicator 5 .... hlt' 11.n,;J~ '-s 20. /J . b, l-,.,._..._,.. -t--ff 65 -f "'-l l,v"' "f'k,_ \c..,< l <;. A..ru'1'.l1 .;u \e-v"-'\ v ,i-Av llA~t,,..r -H ID .I.!. . ::t- Cr, c; , ~ · ·ia.L.orv S H . IO C) 'BL_..:. ' HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC 10<122 ' Z(z..-:.10<> Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in / PhysiologicaVreproductive adaptations ~ areas of prolonged inundation/saturation Wetlanil plant database --~ Morphological adaptations --Personal knowledge of regional plant communities -- Technical Literature ,/ Other ( exnlain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? (!_~ no Rationale for deci_sion/Remarks: h,:j'lro/'h.Jhc 'Ve 3era hon I~ dom, n<>nl. HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? (1es) DO Water Marks: yes (@) Sediment Deposits: yes ® on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes@ Drainage Patterns: yes® ...... other (exolain) lf.c,~ ,,.,l ,"1,,1.dC. "tdt- Dept. of inundation: --inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes@ Channels <12 in. ves t(ruY Depth to free water in pit: --inches FAC Neutral: (;;J. nlY Water-stained Leaves yes®. Depth to saturated soil: -inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: -- Aerial photographs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? (?es) no Rationale for decision/Remarks: prr~, ntf c( hjdrvp1'.J he vr3e/,,np" ln(li< ri"lt''. we f-la n d h:Jtl 10 I 03 y ,l...,' •S s ~ ffo <"i .,.,f' L1 ' .,, -rl-..... ( =,.,R 'S, <-<2.. -pos;.-t,o"-,,, __ .JL 714'... f' ,-...,.-::,.£,., ~ rr{ t. 'i £,, (... <;o ,ls :- SOILS Map Unit Name '7 .. 0 b." IY's.k <)<'IT Lee-..,._ (Series & Phase) Taxonom Proftle Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors (inches) (Munsell (Munsell moist) moist) 11 · rs"( 4-lO '1 p,itz, LP i~ :i/b . Hydrlc Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) --Histosol __ Histic Epipedon --Sulfidic Odor Aguie Moisture Regime "p-Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=I) matrix Hydrlc soils present? ~ no Rationale for decision/Remarks: Drainage Class fbo rly <*rn.l·Y\J Field observations confirm Yes No ma ed Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil size & contrast structure, etc. profile (match descri12tion) M•~1 1i: ~ At.t: .. -r I • I "".i \ (11 c/., I O~V" . --..J. Matrix chroma ~ 2 with mottles __ Mg or Fe Concretions __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Other ( exolain in remarks) l-o0 (_ k V(M" " k"'"' vw,-t{..le > .A \l -tk ~J t; ,_ s.;,\_s cc., :te.v; D ,I'\ Wetland Determination (circle) - Hydrophytic vegetation present? ~ no Hydric soils present? no ls the sampling point (!!!) no Wetland hvdrolo=, nresent? s no within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: - .5,i~ ~\i ~ ~\\ Wv-C...V~·\t.al ~" I ~ "'-cA \ ' +k, .. h.rc. i,1;+-\,...·. ~ "-J e. 41 ~ 1,-i/\ NOTES: ? [bi l !)I .... :\._} bk.vv-- Revised 4/97 DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corns Wetland Delineation ManuaJ1 Project'Site: rr,:~) bro,Y.. l,\ 'ii :-1-A Applicant/owner: lnvesti2ator< s ): ~ \-\-. N\A Do Normal Circumstances hist on the site? ~ no Is the site significantly disturbed ( atypical situation)? ~ Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes & Explanation of atvnical or nroblem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Snecies Stratum %cover Indicator Dominant Plant Snecies ,x.. ri.i.t,..,;s ,,.,r,,, .. J,.,·.~.,e. .... \\ l\o f)ci) s "\'. )<. 1--~ ... -J..,_ + ' 7D fAc.LJ \Ay-"; l "" ..l.:.~-"·· \-\ \i) (Ac. .ir t.1..l,,., '_\~<>••"l,C, {fr-_ 1 \b 'f'l'r L, HYDROPHYTJC VEGETATION INDICATORS: - % of dominants OBL, FACW, &FAC 100 ]., Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Date: (o (zt / o i County: 1,£: •.... ., State: I.JA S/f/R: .,., " -.2~>.1 Community ID: pfb ' Transect ID: IA~:t A Plot ID: .3 Stratum %cover Visual observation of plant species growing in PhysiologicaVreproductive adaptations areas of prolonged inundation/saturation Wetland plant database -Morphological adaptations Personal knowledge ofregional plant communities Technical Literature y: Other ( exnlain) Hydropbytic vegetation present? c,> no Rationale for decision/Remarks: fl-, J. ro fl.) I;,_ "C.J<-t-\; ~ ~ll"""~"'W\ .... l"" HYDROLOGY ~S"f' Indicator -- ~ -- Is it the growing season? e no Water Marks: yes ~-Sediment Deposits: yes e> on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes (!} Drainage Patterns: yes e7 v other fexnlain) loitA-1 ci.,-.~ • J..._,o:- Dept. of inundation: --------inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes f~j Channels <12 in. ves 4 I Dep,th to free water in pit: ±inches FAC Neutral: yes v Water-stained Leaves yes~ Depth to saturated soil: inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lal<e or gage data: -- Aerial ohotoOTaohs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? ( yes~ no Rationale for decision/Remarks: - ~ "t"',,."' KJ., so-.\\ ·,"-iflic~\.t. wt+l • .-J.. 1,.,1 i.folo \ '1 ' SOILS Map Unit Name S:. .. ko:,u.'s"" S; Ir l.9"""""-Drainage Class &or7 Jr-e,..J.. Field observations confirm Yes (Series & Phase) No Taxonom ? Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size & contrast structure, etc. profile moist) moist) (match descriQtion) C?-1~ A lD "{ ti. ':>f-z. 7.,;,., ~/~ (<,-1, f; ... ' , ...... .,_ ~+-5: (_. Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) )( Matrix chroma ;<; 2 with mottles --Histosol __ Histic Epipedon __ Mg or Fe Concretions --Sulfidic Odor __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Aquic Moisture Regime __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ___;6,_ Reducing Conditions __ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List GI eyed or Low-Chroma (= 1) matrix Other (explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? .0.9 no Rationale for decision/Remarks: L • .J C. ~,o ....... ...._ .. ~~ """-\f'e, {,\\ f -t~ C. ,'. \.c. V •• 0 " .lo / ~7.,.{ r,\ .. .so:\; Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ( ves-/ no e Hydric soils present? ~e1/ no Is the sampling point no Wetland hydroloe:v oresent? r ves ) no within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: \.._.-..-' 5.-\-i. f.-1-s 0\l +k,.u-C, y\ h'.,y · .... ) "~J-'. s ~,e.Jo;~ ,J-+ \,-·. "-.. 0e-+i .. ~>. . NOTES: 9[ 6 .1.-,,.- \ ' 1/lU'./ ~ i -t: Revised 4/97 Project/Site: Sf f\ J b n, .,k v\V\'· t Applicant/owner: . DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland DeHneation Manual or 1987 Corns Wetland DeHneation Manna]) ft Date: \o/zl/o'-f County: K; ") State: v,//lr Investi<!aton s ): IV\ \Z. ii-\-S/T/R: To· T2. '3µ, J<.lfe Do Nonna! Circwnstances exist on the site? (:J),< e Community ID: "Pf'o Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes Transect ID: "\.,..:+ A- Is the area a potential Problem Aiea? yes Plot ID: z. Exnlanation of atvnical or nroblem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Snecies Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Snecies Stratum % cover Indicator S,-hx lv,~J,, "" ·c \ ~o f At I.,) S,\ •. _ -k J.. I 1 •-~ , ... v lo r:A<..w f1,, ... 1 ... ~ ""'" \-\ 7D .f?foL vi o,.( ......... i ........ ·le,I\ AL. , ... 'br"'-4-\ '2-0 ~A-L -*" R .. \"'~ .. ,fl,,(_ .. ~-.. ....... v lD f'./r c IA HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL,FACW, &FAC vfc-,, a ~10 Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations -- areas of prolonged inundation/saturation --Wetland plant database _L_ Morphological adaptations --Personal knowledge of regional plant communities -- Teclurical Literature v Other < exnlain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ~ 1 no Rationale for decision/Remarks: £ ·,t(. •J l()m· ... ,+(..l ~1 k~ Jropk 1 t;L v'Lj~ t,. +,,,"' HYDROLOGY c;;i7 Is it the growing season? no Water Marks: yes no Sediment Deposits: yes ~ on . Based on: soil temp (record temp \ Drift Lines: &,I( no Drainage Patterns: yes el"' v other ( exnlain) \•t. ... l (..,t,~u...-1"<.J.~ Dept. of inundation: _Q_inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes~ Channels <12 iw. ~ no . Depth to free water in pit: _'.?:_inches FAC Neutral: yes { no'...:' Water-stained Leaves®> no Depth to saturated soil: __Q_ inches ,._ __ , Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: -- Aerial ohotooranhs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? ~ no Rationale for decision/Remarks: h1 ),ru 10-n S·.\i'... ,!..,...ts ,-t,J,, A : .... Ji.:, ... ~ .. :~) J-,,,µ.,\\ • ,J, I SOILS Map Unit Name r <:(, "'''' s c.._ S<' /, L o,s..,,,,"" (Series & Phase) Taxonom Profile Description 'Pio+ I Drainage Class f9 o.-(7 Jm• ~ Field observations confirm Yes No Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell {M1D1Sel1 size & contrast structure, etc. profile moist) moist) (match descriI!tion) 0-tb +-A lo~~ 1/i 1.r'1 ilt. C,f, f S:C ' ' Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) ...2::::.._ Matrix chroma ~ 2 with mottles --Histosol __ Histic Epipedon __ Mg or Fe Concretions --Sulficlic Odor __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Aquic Moisture Regime __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ~ Reducing Conditions __ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma (~J) matrix Other ( exnlain in remarks) Hydric soils present? r~. no Rationale for decision/Remar : \i } l\ -rk h.,J.,: (... , •. \ s c. r:+i.t:" r\. . Low c\,,...-.,...~ ~"'~ ~ ~J Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ~ no G;) Hydric soils present? no Is the sampling point no Wetland hydroloov ore sent? r ves J no within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: - ~o+ f~\\s .. 1 I tku.. L'";k ... : ... ,,. ... J,.. ,} ~,afr, ,'< ...,,;;-i..,A "-,-/L. +\ ,. ... >,. . NOTES: Revised 4/97 ·' Project/Site: S fr~"J b,....., \<. Applicant/owner: DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual\ I i,, .. ;t A Date: ID /to/ P 1 County: . fej Slate: l,J It Investigator(s): f)1A/.1'1" rYJR. RI\ Sff/R: -=!f1 • T'Z. -.,,v M' I" Do Normal Circumstances hist on the site? ~ no Community ID: PtH Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? ~ Transect ID: LI"''. t A- Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes Plot ID: ;J._ Explanation of atvoical or oroblem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum %cover Indicator fh .. \.,: l M-.~kr,~u .. ,-.. # ~ l\90 FM!J Lit .... , y..,\,y,-. 4,-\ 't> fA-c ' ~ --s,.' ~',( \.uA•,.J,;, \ \O fA-cwi " HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: %ofdominantsOBL,FACW,&FAC !PD Cbeck all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations L areas of prolonged inundation/saturation --Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations Personal knowledge of regional plant communities -- Technical Literature 7'-Other (explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Osv no Rationale for decision/Remarks: S·,k •> Jo,..,.~kA \,'1 hvAn rktt; L ~e;\.._ t: " ..,.._ HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? (:37 no Water Marks: yes e'.? Sediment Deposits: yes ~ on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes{Y Drainage Patterns: yes e::;> V other ( exolain) ,oc.111..I c:,(,.,u;. .. j,Jc<.. Dept. of inundation: .....J.L.. inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes !!lf,' Channels <12 in. ves t'itoJ Depth to free water in pit: ....12... inches FAC Neutral: yes E,? Water-stained Leaves yes J)O-' Depth to saturated soil: .....f2_ inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: -- Aerial photo<>ranhs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? (!;9 no Rationale for decision/Remarks: 5,,...-i:v rA±;J} I ~ -tf.,u... r /'<t'.,'-e.-1..," .--{ 0 J'\JM)itr,,~ ,._,_,._ 1,J,,.,._:t,v<-,{ ""'-· l...7,£"/"51· s O ,1 .. Appendix C -Wetland P hotographs • I. L A-1 -eastern edge of A-1 -showing shrnb community. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 -;7:'I Wa.,.lngton State TII Department of Tranapo,btlon C-1 A-1 -shrub community on eastern edge of A-1 , second photo. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 -:7: Waahlngton State 'ff/I Department of Transportatlan C·2 Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 -;7: Wa•fllngtOII State T/1 Depatment of Tranap«tatlon C-3 Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 C-4 Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 -=r.::'I Wuhlnfton St a l e .,.,, Depa,1,nenl of Tra,,._._n C-5 Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 C-6 . ~ I I ·i-. \ I 1, J . Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 C-7 ~, ', t'. T Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 .... , . . '·; .... ~ -=r.: w-.ito11 Stale 'f'/1 D..-m,e11t all T_..tlon C-8 Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 C-9 B-1-northern edge of wetland -plot 5. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 -WMhlneton State iii De-"""nt of TnHlll-1allon C-11 Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 ,' ...... ',, Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 -::,. WMlllngt ... atota .,,,, ~•nt .r Tra"-"'tlon C-13 ~t ' ~r··· .. , .... ..: '. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 -=z: Waslllln9ton Stale •/I Departmeftt of Transpo,tallon C-14 C-2 -emergent community facing west. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 -ww...,,...., ... s, ... ., De,.,...etlt of TN~ C-15 Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 -;r-w .. 111n11ton State .,,, hpartment of Tra-1atlon C-17 Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 C-18 Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 -;r-Waalll.,.ton Stat• ..,,,, DepwtmHt <>I Tra~tlon C-20 D-1 -culvert outlet from western side of wetland from railroad grade. -Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 :7:: Wuhlngton llat• 'f/1 Depa.-..t of Transportation C-21 Appendix D -Wetland Survey Maps Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May2005 -::r.:_ ..... T/1 Depa.tment of Trwpwtallan Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May2005 -=r---.,, D•pm1m•nt of Tranaportauon "' ::, .... s: a ~ s: u " a: ~ i ! I ~ I I • i " ~ ' I • i >- "' W[TLANO & BOUNDARY SURV[Y SIT[ A CASE" AT CEN'TERUN£ CF FOUND UON 6' r - _.. • -p -·--·- -· =n ·--•• ·-"· UNO ,,r ~ SW ' "'K -'~~ ""' -' --27TH ST ,•'.<!,,· • ~. .. ~. '.J.Z4 .0.v: ,.u, .~ 12.15 "az;b..,.__ ~Alf 4' SW•'$':._ ~:.!"~.~'----_JUNDAVEBW_ • i Nt>l':Jf't.n° rM I ~' ~ I ta ;I~ FOUND UON IN CASE AT P.C. C£N1£1/UN£ "' SW 271H ST FIL£ NAMf TIME DATE: D£S1GN£D BY ENTERED BY CH£CK£D BY PROJ.-rFi?ik. REGIONAL ADM. I >;P.,•,,• ,.. '""' ~·. · .• ,~~,\i&ik-n ··-"i' , .,;O E'hw "·.::a ,' : · ·A">I ,_., 'lit na,: .! !!11£ ....... -+ ~ - REVISION DATE: BY /ll£QON I S1A'I[" -10 IWASH ......... CfMTRAC:1 ICI. -= ~ v LOCA110H NO. Washington State "'" "'" PL S1.-IK»t P.t.S. !iTMIP 90X ; •• •' NOl'tll~ u,m~ --1--+- FOUND MON W CASE AT C0/1'RUNE "' UNO A~ ,t, SW :UTH ST -==u-z I • R roo mr HUITT~ 302 South 91h Slreel, 9.ile 10I Tacoma, Weahington 98402 Phone (2.53) 627-9131 Fax (253) 627-4730 """ ' ~ " """' FWND MON"' l CA.5£' AT POINT OF IN~S£C1ION OF SW 27TH ST e : srt.~ f ,,?~ . lij I I ---! •t9p.· '... ~., 2:.'ll'lz!i""'""''~'·:::J=<ws:•Pf~ ,--~!~-~~~~~ «s.v o..,. i2.~, ·-· ·...-,=~ N00'49'10~ FOUND IION IN CA.Sr AT POINT OF INTERSCCTfON OF SW 27TH ST ~ J.v ~id 'f::tA'f'/!.r."" 1--.uo• CEN1ERUN£ U SW 271H ST FILE NAM£ nME DATE f1 ~ t/ t1:i -ti~ 1M i~ I • D£SIGN£0 BY mTcRED BY CHECKED BY PROJ. ENGR. REGIONAL ADM. 79J.BO' 0,,fftACT H(I. REVISION DATE BY .... w l,:;JCAJJ(WH(L Washington State ~~ .,... PLSTNl'IIOX P.l-5: STMF 80lr Fklfl; 2 ,aw•+ El-. IJ.10 f10fF 2 PIT# On, IJ.ff Flilp: 2 2411' '[1-. IJ.111 • I BJE NOF"J~~ FOUND RaJAR .t CJ.P AT PROPf:RTY CORHER HUITT-K)LJAAS 302 South 9th Street. Ue 101 Taccma, W~on 98402 Phone (253) 627-9131 Fu (253) 627-4730 ..,, ' " " """ ~,U; ~ 1.22] O.,,c 11.,l.J FOUND ftl()N IN 18 s o,-,5'..r r t C4SC AT .S.W CEN1""JNC OF OAK£SDAt.£ All!" .t SW 27TH ST Fii.E NAME nl,IE QATE: DESIGNED BY ENTERED BY CHECKED BY PROJ. f.f'JGR. REGIONAL ADM. 0 § ~ ... ,,. REVISION E OAKESDAU AVA" SW ~==+---r-Z DATE BY ~~ IICGJctiq -STAf!' -10 !WASH -- COH1RAC7 NO. loo F'EET tOCIJJGW NO. ~"2.45 R-6000.00 ~·,~·,u" GS•S00':51'.Ja'T Cl.•442,75 rouND MON IN CAS£ AT POOlr OF' INTCRS£CT10N OF' OAX€SIMJI A~ .. ., PL S1-BO.>< l'.I..S.S1AMPll0lt --./' ""' L•J2fi.B4 ~oo- ~TJ7'16" CS•N01"24"52.,, a.-Jlf.80 .... i; Washington State ~i;l;, ~~ ~- "'f" ~i ~- FOOHO R<B"1 .t CAP o.r7' ~ OF PR<f'ERrt \ NOFT11'15T 266.92' NOl30'2.!Th CORNER i aw ROW QIIE1it.APS EXIS11NG Pl.AT S£E PARCEJ. B NARRfA11\£" FOR ADDHOI-". INF'ORMA 11arl Ft:A1HD MON IN 0 ~~~ ~ _., •".,:· I HUllT-zouARS 302 Soulh 111h street. Buie 101 Taccma. W881*'Qton 98402 Phone C253) 627-9131 Fax C253) 627-4730 ~ • "' w """' --·--·---·--·--·--·--·--·--·--·---·----,-; 0: c,; L•107.M F!aF .J Ml'-,I.R•6040.00 no,: J w, &..-11.D1 j1.0--1'01'24• ,DN' IUI jcs-son. Flag: J "8-l DM 1:,.20 ij ~l-l i'~ ~ <ti TRACT '£' tl ~a' 6 k: is l.! -., s.;:. "' I FIL£ NAME RME: DA""fi DESIGNED BY ENTERED BY CHECKED BY PROJ. ENGR. REGIONAL ADM. '•./ ~oo- .t,,,Jtln6· CB-N01'24'$2-W a.•326.80 l_-326.84 l•f74.JZ REVISION 1 __________ _:::W;:_'E~TL:.::A:::N'..'.:'.D'.J,) & BOUNDARY $URV[Y J F SIT[ C 10 -- C'QOfflt.llC7 NO. DATE BY -W 252.53' ==~ ; I MATCH M" PL SfMIP(lr»( FOVND MON IN CASE" AT CCN7"'UN< c,- ---'OA&KC-'CSDCAL.£ A I£ ----- ,. , .. 560,22' LINE PAGE 6 "" l'.L5.. STAMP (K)J( ~~]fW -== 0-ZI.C • .... ~ Washington State -, ; !! 1f 1 j j I I .- / I ! ~tJ;~ ++-- 1;--4 FOUND MON fN C..UC AT CEHTCRUN£ OF OAKCSO.M.£ A \IE" ,t SW .HTH ST r Z:--c:=::s.. a 2.s so ,oo FEET HUITI-?DLJARS 302 Sculh 91h Street. &ite 101 Taeoma, Waahlngton 98402 Phone (253) 627-9131 Fax (253) 627-4730 ""' ' " " """' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I <( Vi n.-J NII ,t ""' ""' O:i TRACT '£' 13 lS §' " s: ~£ ..., ~ Q iii LOT JJ [llf_ ,YAµ£ nME P_A~"- DESIGNfp __ 8_'( ENTERED (JY CHECKroBr PROJ. tNGR. REGIONAL ADM. 1-~;~{k·-~ ~ ,f/tfl'/t2 no,., 'Nllll'l On: 21!.U fl•" 22.CU R£VlSION DATE 8Y (;Djl1'1).Cr HQ. . (;/~-~ 11.lf' \7/ °'.:'·.':";-:-~ .SAz& •',!}i Cw /9,0() --.. WETLAND & BOUNDARY SURVEY SIT[ C MATQ/j_ F!<>g: J nw .flof:: Pl.(IT!SII £hr: :U.14 °'1YI :l/. r2 Fl<,,g: ) 16W ~&~~2t 1 ~ 9 w LINE PAGE 7 .... w Woshinqlon State (l,\)i -PL STMIPB(}J( P.u: $MW' SOX / ~ ....... --, -~ fl<¥: :, C w,, ""' .. ~ • """' :, t »l.J .~J'AU n. :JCll'IQ ~J_i"ll' """' tf.01 -f;; .. • ~ JCllfll no,,: .J C 11'111 0-;n.(la 'l" v ... ,...,+ n..: Jc• +n-2,.:11 +,-JC/in °""" n.:u ~ JCIIII 0-... tf."'5 Fi¥. JC .... a...: 21,0CJ ~ ·~2 ,.,::rw ""'~ HUl1T-Il!ARS 302 Soulh 91h Stroot, &at• '/JI T""""" WulrQlcn 98402 Phone (253) 627-11131 Fax (253) 627-4730 """ ' ~ w S<UB FILE NAME TIM£ OAT[ DESIGNED BY ENTERED BY CHECKEQ BY PROJ. ENGR. LOT 33 --_, W'~llffl' Cl, ~· REGIONAL ADM. ) REVISION WETLAND & BOUNDARY SURVEY SITE C !!fJ2T)8'01~ 1095.60' "¥' ''""' l4.M Flay.· I .f-2H15 BNSF RR RIGHT OF WAY ~=="+--,...:.z 0 25 50 ~ FEET ~ I STAI£ 10 IWASH ,,, ...... COl'illMCT HQ. =-~ ™~ ™~ OAT[ BY P.£. ST.oUl"(l(D" P..t..S.STNIBOr "¥' rH.15 nap;, ' Flo,: , .ON DJ.9 ... EJn: :IUO ..... u Washington State fi"'I' I +°""' n.61 Flag: ' £kl<" :u . .u • HUITT-KllARS 302 South 91h Street, &ite 101 Tacoma, Wuhir"gton 98402 Phone (253) 627-9131 Fu (253) 627-4730 ""' ' ~ " -~ '-(5 a: :;;:, Cl cj co ~ -.J a f-C ~ FILE NAME RM£ DATE D£S1GN£D BY ENTfRfti7ir CHECKW BY PROJ. ENGR. REGIONAL ADM. -,~ a.,, ~l.16 REWSION '-~ -.J ~ C) co 'SC ~ -.J a ;c; ~ DATE BY ~OJ .. WETLAr.~ ,, BOUNDARY SURVEY ::;,, re C FOUND MBAR .& CAP ll 1~' ... C;O:,' :s Of' PROPERTY CCRHER ~==~z~=::::s.. ~[-S1All" = 10 IWASH -- C!WlllACT HQ 0-2:i 50----,., e,n =-= ..,r PLSToWPIICI'" P.L.S STAMP BOX ,..,r u~,,· ~r',$1T. ..... .... v Washington State FOONO IION IN CA.SC A 7 C£NTERI..JN( OF" SW 4JRO ST .t' OM~SDIJ.£ '"' ~,. ;. a• i1 al ..... ,.._ I ""'"""'" HOT FOUND. CAI.C!JUJZD N< CCIINER or ADAMS a.c H<I.D ,s CCNm<UNE or SW 4JRO ST li I~ I • .. .,,.,., .. 41.fY-,,, -1 ' FOOHD UON IN C<S£ j AT INTCRSECTION OF SW 4.JRO ST .& M£ST VAU.E'Y HWY. HUITTZOIJARS 302 South 91h street. Sule 101 Tacoma, Wlllhi'lgton 98402 Phone (253) 627-9131 Fax C253) 627-4730 S>EV • ~ .. -~ Fib£ /.MME nME DAI£ D(.SIGNED BY ENTERED BY Cff_Eck__£D BY PROJ. ENGR. REGIONAL ADM. ---·-~----- LEGEND m NATURAL GAS VALVE • STORM DRAIN CATCH EIASIN o STORM ORAIN Cl.£.ANOUT @ STORM OR.I.IN JAANHOLE t-----< STORM DRAIN OUTFALL PIPE . GUARD POST OR SUPPORT POST 9-FIRE H'YOWIT • WATER METER .. WAlER VALVE • WATtR MARKER POST ·" SPOT ELEV, ·" ... .@§;~~l.L----.;~~~"':::::..~ " -~ ' / ' ' / ' ', ' ,,J ' ~\ I I \ ............. .,, __ ) . ...._ I ----1 i I .•' \ ·" \ I ... .•. / / ,/ / . TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY '51 ff D SOMH RIM-25.81 IE 12" ABS w-21.91 IE 12" ASS S.-21.91 ,, ~ SDMH RIM• 26.52 IE 12" ABS NW• 2l.12 tli IE 6" D1P E• 22.92 I l ·-...--------. ---,.~----_r---------.::;;:::-<::.. ___ _ \ 1 -~ ."1" -=;:;~::: D#fT "°40 .r ~ -~ = IJl/tT IIQ4D fJIJ.'2' - ,.1 ----------------.......---,-------, ~~--::i._--~, I "\....... <. ........,.,_ -_,,._ ----~ ---I'-. ./-::.~ d .... ,a-.....;,_.~.,--a_i===--_.,_,_ ----cz~-----::_-=---.., -;z -,( A -2'-"\; ', y -._Jf ,.. N,:i J -~k. -~2-::~J=::---( ....... , ~1 ...:::--\ ,.,,. -0i ' 1~1: I ,t' --... / -'JU--.. \ .a; V/,_ u,v., I ..____ 2z--'--'-... 1/ I/ ') 1....,...., \ \ I 1 • .•. ) ... \, " --... _;, .•. Ir .•. ., ,.:;-_,.c, ·" #=-\') \ , , l~-0r,£'.,,, i ~~~ ., . (/ -<'I " / I /, "' B--. J .,--»=-"-'/ -0'~ "-C L ,.___ I L ?' --.,'" °" 11 ~"'"' /, -...:;._ I, ... , 'x-,\."'----;. "" /,,-,,.,-......._., I ,., I 1() _.,.-..cc,-'\ fl// ----..,.._ Ji '-\ , / I _;;, ( I _., / .v .___" \ , I"-Ir_--....,._, or I,,_ -,, ~ o / l 1\ f '-~ -,,___ I ;;,, \\'('ON~, ~'~-=='.::i ~~ " \ . ....,, -\ ~ __ ,,, \\'\\ I --IL .d/ I ·1 .~11 . I > i\ :~,:..,,--'-f ~, _,,. J \ ~I J • :-s • " J ( ' \ / -I \ l I ~~I I ., ! ...-J'-. / I // .A \ • !,. 1 : . '-•-" /·"!C I \, \ / "" ' ~ '-\ --:i,1 _} I .•• I / / I .. r a -~ .• .- _., 0 ·" ·" _., ·" ·" ·" .. -~ I _J-ffo'_J HORIZONTAL DA TUM -,--1-CHAINUNK FENCE NAO ~ / 91 WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT or TRANSPORTATION MONUMENTS, /1JB6 AND #5276 WA. NORTH STATE PLANE PROJECTION ~ REVISION VERTICAL DA TUM NAVO BB WASHll-lGTON STATE DEPAA'TMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MONUMENT 11386 ELEV•52.29 UTILlTY N_OTE THE UNOERGRO\.IND UTIUTIES AA£ SHOWN HEREON BY FIELD LOCATING SURFACE APPURTtNANCES. CONTRACTORS SHALL VERIFY INFORMATION REGAAOING THE LOCATION AND SIZES or All UNDERGROUND UTILITIES BEF"ORE COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION. SURVEYOR'S NOTES DATE FJELD MAPPING COMPLETED DECEMBER 2004 -JANl».RY 2005. ALL MONUWENTS INOICAlro 1'S FOUND WERE "\llSlfEO DURING THIS n•< INSTRUMENT usm G(0DIMETER G-600 TOTAL. STATION a: TRIMBLE GPS, THIS SURVEY Mf£TS OR EXCE£Ds THE REQUIREMENTS Of WIC 3J2-1J0-090 ~ I ST,lir 10 lwASH --- ''"""'" = =-~ BY ~~ PL STAJ,11' BO/( DAI£ ..,,L.S 57-llaX ---M....!!'~· i ' ~==+:-r-Z-==-j • ..... w Washington Slate 2~~ 100 FEa HUITT-zoLJARS 302 Soulh 91h street. &ito 101 Tacoma, Waal*gtan 98402 Phcno (253) 627-9131 Fu (253) 627-4730 """ • " " """ MATCH LINE RIGHT NOt"J(ht"E BJ.95 i" ~: •: BOUNDARY SURVEY SITE E ~ 1r. , ~~ ~ ~ .... ->-,:,. """° R<BAR ANO CAP O..Jz' S « 0.11' t Of' PIWP81TY """"" i" ~1~ i~ MATCH LINE ABOVE LEFT ~/ .. ·"" ~~ i "1 PARCEL£ ~ "'~ ,,, .;,..,._ ~ ..-3 .... ~ ...... <r Z:-=:=::,,.. o'7!ls 50 16o ft£T S01'30"J1-W 1127.99 . F<IJN(U,cJN IN CASt ; AT CCNf<RUl<JICF • """"""'",~ • SW ' "'0AasDAu AVJ!' $W --• .,. ""~" :U1HST ~ I I -"',U, "' -----•M-" -;---L. -11164.IU" FOUND 11KW IN CASE' AT C£N'IE1f1.W£ OF ~ALEAIE' -. -lltlP~ FCC/NOMONIN CASt AT COl1<Rt.lNC OF CIJ(CSDAl£ ,0£.tSW •'1ST ST ~ FILE NAM£ n'ii'i - D~T£ -:r r STAIF 10. JWASH .... HUilT2[)1JAAS DESIGNED BY ENTERED BY CHECKED BY PR6IENGR. REGIONAL ADM. REVISION DATE BY ~- CCWMAC1 NO. LOCATION NO. -P.£. S1°N' IIOJ( DAit' PJ,.S.Sr..-flQJt w Washington State 302 Soulh 91h street. Sule 101 Tacoma, W~on 98-402 Phone (253) 627-9131 Fu (253) 627-4730 ·1 I HIT " ~ " """'