HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA-06-156_Report 1I
I
I
... r.n,. ""'-""
'
ENGINEERS -SURVEYORS ---
.~,.,,-~ i ··),.:r-r ... _ .
::~,1:11 Uii! ?.1l!li 11° i ', : ~_:_--: :..;-
!; '! l'•it ! •I I ~ . ....; . I ·--·. ;
:; ii 1:! 1 '' 11 ! ' ' .. :::.-: ;" l ;
Ji i
TERRY DUTRO
1820: NE 20TH BTREET
' ;:---r' • \ • . 'l J, ' ---!· ';
I
I
.,.
== I .,
I .,j,!!
-hi((!
---·
......... .,. ..
... nr, ........
'
"'ii
TERRY DUTRO
fS:11$ NE 20TH STREET
RENTON. WA eaoss DIIAlffAGE
PLAII
; -·;-.. _ _.r-i ··-
,'
. !,
~ ; I :
; '
I
I
I
--
;;
:,j)!! -I l'i;i!! ~,u
"S-0, _,..,.., .,.,.,..._ ..,.,.,
I
I
ENGINEERS -SURVEYORS ---
TERRY DUTRO
11326 NE 20TH BTREET
RENTON, WA 98056 -flLAII
l;--·-. '
:: ·;
•
I
I
I
I m..,._ I ---~-~-~~n---.... -~~-, -----------------.... ,;.
A I l:I \ \ I ~ 'j: /-··1,
ii~-/~ i \lltt:l-.--
' 11 / : ~ ,-,
~ I i,
TERRY OOTRO
182~ NE 20TH STREET
PUN
~ -'1·---~ ', : ----' ----,;; : ', . .::.-
1 ;---
:: /
i . ·,
, ; I -. I
I
I
I
... = -"'"'"' ........ ,,,,..,
!
ENGINEERS -SURVEYORS
---
TERRY DUTRO
1828 HE 20TH STREET
RENTON, WA 98066
' .. ,
, ; I , . r
I;---'' ·---p :;
UTILITES
I
I '
!
' •t·-c"--~ •
-~-----,
I ''
••
)
i
. '
DETAIi. /JUJI ~--...----a:
SH. PL _______ _ PRELIMINARY SHORT PLAT
BLUEBERRY MEADOWS OWNER/DEVELOPER
OIIW£R-1FRRY DUTJ10
D£o£L0P£R-MASffRBl!llD£R CONS1RUcm:w
SEC. Ii, TWP 23N. RGE. 5E W.M.
j '' "' ---
'
,. .," ...... I LEGEND:
~ • io,,., "' .. ""' ~
__ .. I\ .... ~
''t.~ ~.. ...,-,~ ... '"'"
/ .,. ,..,A "''"'" -0-• f()!J//(J CG\IIICRfTE" .IIO,',j(!MENT .t C,151:
f''~•• 1 J f "'"~" .. ,.." e •SETRESAR.tCM'LS#JJfBl
~-.J' i ! f .. ,..,0 0 •fOO//DflEBAR.tCAPASSHOIIN ' , • 1 • ! ~ "'"''" <n>•IJl!l.lTYPOC£ • I ~.-~ ! l • BITE ft f i' l A • l\'A'IER VAL\1£
I ,r q . ~! -S,'J--STORII !)R,',!/0 L/lv[
\
... f.. ; ! ! l --s-• S.."IITARY SEIIER I.J"IE ~,.... '
\ .. ,,.~ .,,,,.~ { .. ,,.,., ~ -OHP-• 01£R H£AD POWER UN£
\
"''"'" f '"""'" Q • S..NITARY S!IIER AIANHOLE ., .. J
~ D • CATCH IMS///
' ' ' '
VICINITY MAP 11.r.s.
Lon WT J
r:' •. ;;, :,,.,.,;·, ...... .c.:.~.-nu·
,ilT 6 i'C/. 22'.', F~. BUI
LOT! I
I
I UJT l'
CURV[ TABL[
CUR\£ LENGTH RADIUS
" "
WJE
" u
~.~ •2.00
21,.78 .. oo
LIN[ TABLE
LENGTH
111-~ ,.~
;~7 2
I
I
I
DELTA
BEARING ..
!OT ~
-~..,,~,1 !ION. W~ASS
l!ISK .mD "X"
(~SITEO 10/06)
~" Rtlf-261.-UJ
24" 1£ E:)-2,,.-ui u· 1t:fw)-251.•ol qi
I " I
i I~· l
! i /ill
I I ·~ I ~~~
''·' " ·"""'"' I I J 11
/.111/'i.AT"ii'.ll
10711 ~ JDIH ST.
BUI.H'IIE". WA SBD04 (•2,) ·"-6"'°
C(WTJ.CT-TERRY avn;o
LAND SURVEYOR/ENGINEER
EAS1SID£ ODNSlJl.TAIITS INC.
41~ RAIN/(R Bl.ltl. N.
/SSJIQIIAH, WA !llffJ27
(f2S) Jlil2-SJ5f
SITE ADDRESS'
111,;/8 N0/111/fAST 20111 SJJ?ffT
R£/'ITON, WA llBOl>li'
TAA~ J-O-J201
ZOHf. R-6.
M~~ OEJ<S1TY IS 8 1.1,~115/Ac:Rf
Pfli:P, DDISITY IS 7.~ llMT5/ACRf
~
GRAPHIC SCALE
(INFHT) ·--p I
lC~~:.W24"WI ~~BY ,/-J:fo -1, S00'29'24"11'
JQ.01' I 1...,h * 411 tt.
• ..,,,,-111.79 ~ 1" ,/ __ ,/ / GRAI£!. Q!111£WAY
/Cl )OJ/ / / ,.---,,~
• / / --->'I"' \
~: "' _ -/ LOT 4 ·· ! io' V;,
l,l~-//CONCSI.AB /
ffl /~ ro B£ RfMO\,ED l-
:·· il:I ----~
"~.'~'.P!lll.'A·rr· I .. -·... G1Ul£LDRll£WM., HI---Y-J BASIS OF BEARING ACC£SS f).Sff.lfNT w 1./NE: tu· Of fflACT 2M "' -THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR
--1.1 , ).0 Bl ..,: THIS SURVEY lS THE
i IN= fGflESS j A! ( !IEIUl'IO J ~~'J5 "C I .,, ti) ;:~/~:~~3.S"E • ,~, ~,-{'t ! \ "" ,,,., I I ,.,, mm · I I I i: PER THE PLAT OF STONE
I -" t, ' . I 'A." .'.' :>;>;J9(1.3W2 I O CASTLE VOL 200, PAGE 511-81
1,.-§ ~ Ai'. B2: I i C'lj AS SHOWN
', •· i:, LOT 3 ~ i/ ' ~LI soo,rn·, '."°' _['; LOT 2 !i LOT 1 1 ~ ~ I I . ~ VERTICAL DATUM
-M I~ ·::ti A5 BJ ~, I IIERTICAL DATU!/ FOR rms
~ ~ !il lo" mrn SIA~TS I ~' v, SURVEY IS BASED ON CITY OJi' ~ 15• ---I !ii ol co-~ ,,: ::e fl RENTON BENCH MARK NO. JIKl!I
I
--. -~ ;JJP.
,-~---5tm.s rsMT "l!ir060098 ss~:_ ~:;'·~ ;;_ £'
B!!,_Qt;I"
I ~ r-· ------LO" J --... ~ 5o
I''
AREA C:ALCULA TIONS:
roTAI-UJT AR£A • ~1,0057 SO. H 1.17 ACIIES
LOT 1 •1l,21J SQ.FT.
LOT 2 =ll,!2g SQ.FT.
lOT J -11.402 SQ.FT.
lOT ~ -11,.u, SQ./fT,
11V,CT A -6,055 SQ,/fT.
NOff !HE OC1Sl'l'-G Ul'IUllES ~S SHOIIN
Am: OOlY).PPRClll/MATE. D~R
[)(IS'J'IHC U11LJJ'l£S IMY EX/ST
ALOl1'G "IHIS ~()PO$£!) "'l/Cll>lDJT.
IT SJ/AU fl£ !Hf COHll?ACm? )JlfJ/
OR OIINERS RESPONS/11/LJTY TO
,'Ell/FY 11/E Sllf. Tll"C lOCJl,J'IClf,/ MO
OE'Pffl r:T All. EX/Snt/G UTIUl!f:S
PRIOR TO STMIT1NG CCWSll!UC11GN
e111 8-lore You Dl11
__ 1-800-424-5555
RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE ...
FILED FOR R£G0RD mis ...... OAY Of
IN BOOK... . .OF... .. .. AT PAG[.
Rf.QUEST OF .. fl.~w~~fi/f9f18P··
SURVEY NOTES
IHI: PURP()S[ Of" 111/S SURVEY IS ro Pfl£1'AR£ !I. ~ LOT SHORT PUT Of" 1H£ PI\RCCL
ll6CRIBru l'ERE.ON.
2. /NS1RUM£1/f: USING !I. MXON DIM J50 f'IV[ S£C0HD TOUL SrAIIG\'I MIi-/ Rf:.SULIIIIG Cl.0SUR£S
<.XC£JiI!ING Jfif MINIMUM ACCIJR!I.C\' STANDAAOS AS SH fDR1H BY WAC J.52-!JO.
.l IH£ IIOUIYDARY CORNERS AmJ LINES !ICPIC1UI DN II/IS MAP ARE PEJ? RE"COOII 1171.C
,NrCllRIATION AND Rt:Pllf5E"NT ot:ED UllfS ONI. Y. ffl[Y 00 N:JT PURPORT ro ~ow 011,NfRSHIP
LINES 'II/AT 1/AY OIHl;R\11~ !if PEIDllllNW IJY A COORf C/f" U.W.
4. 1HE: ~llANO IJWN!JN/1£S AS SHOlflo/ HJ,REON Mil; Pf:R 1HE SKfn;H PROVIIJCO UY RDGVI DU
-~ ,l !I.SSOOA!l:5 ANO 11ERt" NOT F!UO lOCATW.
5. !\U flEW -~ /'CR 7!115 Pf10.£CT W!I.S l'fl/1"0/ll,/f:D IN DCJQIDI if W~.
6. RfF£RENCf. IS M'AOC TD 'Ill£: FCUOlll"G" Rt:CORDS C/f" 5URl'fY ~/CH ~Rt: USfD ro CAI.CULAIZ'.
~~A:'ffci:tMI;\~:r :~:r,,,11£~~1'£ 2U GF PLATS PAG£ 6J-8B.
OTY C/f" RfHTON SHOOT 1'1AT REC. NO. IIBll50iPOOll.
QTY C/f" RU/TOO LOT UNE: AD.l!SIMOIT Rf:C. NO. !l~H299003
Pi.AT Of' STONE" 1:'ASl1£ J!Et:Ofiot:O IN .«Wt: 2IXI CF PLATS PAIXS 39-51
RHX)RDS rT KING COUNn', WA5fflNCTCW.
200 .. AT ...... M
.. AT THE
SUR~YOR'S CfRTIFICATE
rrt/S f,/AP CORRfC1l Y Rf:PR£S£1'ITS A SURVfY MADE
BY M£ OR UNO£R MY DIRECllDN IN CONFORMANC£ Wl1H
THE R[OU/R[l.lENTS OF 1H£ SURVEY RECORDING ACT AT
TH[ R[OU[ST OF .. 11:M.Y. QrJ.l]'Q ...
IN .... OCI ..... 2cxx;.
MGR. SUPT. OF R[CORDS
.f??f?J:_F!.T./ JJ~P.W
CERnl'ICA T£ NO ...... .J.J.HH ...
:a; ~ . _ • . . • • RIM~2S5.14 I . E)( S511'1 ELEVATION~ 279.JB' (NA VD 88)
:!'i ,!,1/U.i\->o ""·· •• ~ , •• •£(£J-n~ ;,• I' er1..,-2:;;;.c~
36" ,£(W} -25W I ~f~;::.i~}~
----------_j I s,--s,--ss--ss--ss--"--•~J =• I -~~ -2<1~<12 If 11') 2•9•2 I JO If J-24932
JONES AVE HE
$----~ SOOJ,H~·w 12JlBB' --
'"\_ FND C~ CONC fMJ CASED COI/C.
~~¥=I'll/ t~· JI~~ Pm
llfON. IJ;J4 1100. l!BJ9
(llSl1'f!J 1~(1)6) (l'ISIJED 10/<)6)
il'GAL DESCRIPTION
lDT(S) 284 C.D. Hl/.1.MAH'S LAA£ ll'ASHJMTa.
CIIROE:N C/f" flJf.N Dll'ISION 110. f, ACC~G TD IHf
Pl.AT THERE:C/f" Rf.CORDW IN 11:Jl.l/Mf 11 OF PU.IS.
PJ.GE:(S) 82. 1H KING CO!J/ITY, WASn'WGTCW,
f/ra:PT 11/t 11£51 !26 /TH 11/EREOF l YII/C Nr:JR!>/
OF lllf SOLJ:r>i 2J4 FfH 'INORE:OF; AND
£!.-C(PT 'II/( .SOU'II/ 2Jf ffH 7HREOF" ll1NG 1'£Sf OF
11-1£ tAsr n ,ur ™E:fft:Df
• ,:..:. J. Ii
~.\"~ "'·" ~ .. ~
~3zl lL~_!.~
BLUEBERRY MEADOWS SHORT PLAT
FOR TERRY DUTRO
CITY OF RENTON WASHINGTON
!NGN'/!118 .. Ullt~
R.BQGDQN 1"=40' OF 1
CITY OF RENTON
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
Date:
To:
From:
MEMORANDUM
September 13, 2013
City Clerk's Office
Stacy M Tucker
Subject: Land Use File Closeout
Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City
Clerk's Office.
Project Name: Blueberry Meadow Short Plat
LUA (file) Number: LUA-06-156, ECF, SHPL-A
Cross-References:
AKA's:
Project Manager: Jill Ding/Vanessa Dolbee
Acceptance Date:
Applicant: -~j)Ld'<O
Owner: eon .;-.v1.. :~ • Contact: " e WI
PIO Number:
ERC Decision Date:
ERC Appeal Date:
Administrative Denial:
Appeal Period Ends:
Public Hearing Date:
Date Appealed to HEX:
By Whom:
HEX Decision: Date:
Date Appealed to Council:
By Whom:
Council Decision: Date:
Mylar Recording Number:
Project Description: LUA voided due to inactivity.
Location: 1828 NE 20th Street
Comments:
---
.. .•...
!
I
I
I
I
'
!
i
!
I
' '
I
I
I
I
!
.I
' I
!
' I
"·" . ...,,,..,.f
SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION
I • Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
I item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
I • Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
• Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
. . • • •
D. Is delivery address different from item 1?
If YES, enter delivery address below:
Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-t 540
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
11111
First-Class Mail
Postage & Fees Paid
USPS
Permit No. G-1 O
• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
CA~
\9'~ [k;/Ja, -~
t(fifb 8. ~ lJ$f--
~ [J)J ff6<ftff
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
1111
First-Class Mail
Postage & Fees Paid
USPS
Pem,it No. G-10
SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION
• Complete items 1, 2, and 3. A>so complete
item 4 ~ Restricted Delivery is desired.
• Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
• Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
oi-on the front if space permits.
1. Arlcte Addressad to:
COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELfVERY
A. Signature
X 0 Agent
0Addressee
B. Received by ( Printed Name) I C. Date of Delhrery
o_ Is delivery address different from Item ~? D Yes
If YES, enter de!/ve,y address below: D No
3. Service Type
..fBtertlfied Mail
Cl Registered
0 Insured Mail
CJ Express Mall
0 Return Receipt for Merchandise
Oc.o.o.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) D Yes
2. Article Number
(Transfer from se.rvfce (abelJ
7008 1830 0004 8759 1955
PS Form 3811, February 2004· Domestic Return Aaceipt 102595-02-M-1540
Department of Community
& Economic Development
1055 South Grady Way
Renton WA 98057-3232
/)( ,=/~ vt1--/tu f;~)1UJ~
'0~~ -I
. / , '-{1'1/ 1.-,_ ./ .''j
y• . , ,_.,, \ __ ,..
/
··r·?
\./ ! -~~I/
' '.~.,,,"··_../ . , _ ____..
\ . '~-\<,,
rn
r-
Ul .-a
IT"
U1
r-
'°
~
D
D
D
D rn
'°
U.S. Postal Service.,,
CERTIFIED MAIL" RECEIPT
(Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided)
Postaoe
0
$ _______ _,
Certified Fee v
Return Receipt Fee
(Endorsement Required) '--------~
Restricted Delivery Fee
(Endorsement Required) I--------~
Postmark
Here
.-a ==~..---~--~--~--------~
'° D
D
r-Cfty. State, ZfP+4
PS Form 3800 August 2006 See Reverse, for Instructions
Department of Community
0 Economic Development =--~-.----r. =-=-.J 1055 South Grady Way
Renton WA 98057-3232
(-:ity_of. ._
~llli)j'j
~S.f~ ~w~B~
mo JJ wA noir ..... e~ ""· "
<' ' ..... ' • '",•'::!n"s .:: .,,,,,,
1-' 0 """ '" """' ~ ~ ..... o.., ' . .,,"''
I:) !Vo S1.1c1y s~ I:) 19"" lvfV D
' -I:) 'IVs S1.1c1y" fc/"f'r l.!s"D
l.!""10,,-l.!4,S<'I/ ~IVr
A.oofc/r
~ss
.... ,i;::-,: :-';. (' .;Q: ! , ::;:;
I I 111
7008 1830 0004 8759 1955
I I. I. ,1,,1, JI,,," i, 11,,,1, ,i,11, ,J,11,, ,i,,, I, ,,Jl,I, \,,, ,111 t-Yf
Department of Community
& Economic Development
1055 South Grady Way
Renton WA 98057-3232
OJ~~@J]l
Q.'.;;;%)
;~t "41',."D
f~JJ~
~f
k OG-/5G
,.)
~
U.S. Postal Service'"
CERTIFIED MAIL,., RECEIPT
(Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance CoveragD Provided)
Postage $ 1---------1
Certified Fee
D Ae1um Receipt Fee
D {Endorsement Required)
Cl 1--------<
Postmark
Here
Cl m
"' .-a
"' Cl
Cl r-
Resiricled Delivery Fee
(Endorsemen1 Required) f------,
sent To
srreet, Apt. No.;
or PO Box No.
City. State, Zf P+4
PS Form 3800 August ?006 Sec Reverse for Instructions
Denis Law
Mayor
July 25, 2012
Ron-Frederikson
Eastside Consultants, Inc.
415 Rainier Blvd N
Issaquah, WA 98027
SUBJECT: "Final" Notice
r
[ ___,
City of 1 ~rrw11
Department of Community and Economic Development
C.E."Ch i p"Vi ncent, Administrator
Blueberry Meadows Short Plat/ LUA06-1S6, SHPI-A
Dear Mr. Frederickson:
The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that the above subject
application is expired. According to RMC 4-8-lOOC.4-Expiration of Complete Land Use
Applications, the application submitted on December 5, 2006 has been inactive for
ninety (90) days or more and an administrative decision has not been made and/or has
not been reviewed by the Hearing Examiner in a public hearing.
According to our records, a Notice of Incomplete Application notification (enclosed) was
mailed on December 18, 2006, stating required information was necessary in order to
continue processing the submitted application. As of the date of this letter, the
requested information has not been received. Therefore, this is your final notice, if the
City of Renton Planning Division does not receive a written request to continue
processing the application and the requested information within six (6) months of the
date ofthis letter the application shall be null and void.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (425) 430-7314.
Sincerely,
Vanessa Dolbee
Senior Planner
Enclosed: Notice of Incomplete Application-dated: December 18, 2006
cc: Terry Dutro/ Owner{s)
Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov
4' ~
+ ..a +
CIT"\_ JF RENTON
Planning/Building/Public Works Department
Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator O~
~y ~~
~ -2'; Kathy Keolker, Mayor ~N~Or-------------------------~
December 18, 2006
Ron Frederikson
Eastside Consultants, Inc.
415 Rainier Blvd N
Issaquah, WA 98027
RE: Blueberry Meadows Short Plat Notice of Incomplete Application
Renton File No. LUA06-I56, SHPL-A
Dear Mr. Frederikson:
After reviewing the materials submitted for the Blueberry Meadows Short Plat
application, staff has determined that the application is incomplete according to the
City's submittal requirements as outlined in RMC 4-8-I20C. The following information
is required to accept the application as complete:
1. Preliminary wetland mitigation plan. A preliminary wetland mitigation plan
is required for impacts proposed to an off-site wetland to the west of the pan
handle of the subject proper! y due to construction improvements required for the
proposed 26-foot wide private street. The plan shall include mitigation for the
impacts proposed to the wetland buffer as well as any paper fill that results from
the proposed development.
Furthermore, the additional items listed below are required to complete the review of the
submitted application. Please submit the following information:
1. Revised landscape plan. The submitted landscape plan shall be revised to
comply with the City's landscape regulations, which include the installation of2
trees within the front yard areas of each lot. The plan shall include the species
proposed, spacing, size, and planting specification.
2. Secondary wetland review. A grading license (B060514) issued on the subject
property is currently under appeal. The substance of the appeal is regarding
whether or not grading occun-eJ within a wetland. The wetland report submmed
with the project application was prepared by del Moral & Associates and is
dated September 22, 2006 with a supplemental wetland delineation dated
October 26, 2006. The delineation identifies an off-site wetland to the west of
-------l-0-55_S_o_u_th_G_r_ad_y_W-ay---R-e-nt_o_n.-W-a-s-hi-ngt-on_9_80_5_5 _______ ~
@ This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30% post consumer
AHEAD OF THE. CURVE
the pan handle of the subject property; however no wetlands were identified on
the project site. The City has conflicting information regarding whether a
wetland and/or wetland buffer extends onto the subject property and what the
classification of the wetland is, therefore secondary review of the submitted
wetland report prepared by de] Moral & Associates is required. Per a letter from
the City dated December 8, 2006 secondary review of the wetland reports
prepared by de! Moral & Associates is required and the results of this review
shall be submitted to the City by January 2, 2007.
Please submit 3 copies of a preliminary wetland mitigation plan, S full size copies and l
reduced 8 Yi inch by 11 inch PMT of a revised landscape plan, and 3 copies of the
results of the secondary wetland review. Once the above requested information is
received, review of your application will begin. Feel free to contact me with any
questions at (425) 430-7219.
Sincerely, /:.jj ;;f '7'
Jill K. Ding ~
Senior Planner
cc Terry Dutro, owner
File
PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION
NAME: PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME:
T .. r.,,, II Tr"
I ,11 ~ ~ J,, .,.~,, 1,1..,, e -1,\,-,v.,;,
ADDRESS:
j ,J 7 11 l~c 1~ . .:-:;-,;....,. ,· -" .
CITY: ZIP:
r
PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE:
,~~;, ;v,_:; _;..;,;/..-. .'7~----
(I.J; W r O ,._ "'-' A '{ 5 " -~ ~
R ,. I I 1::-v· ..... c '10<'( 'I
TELEPHONE NUMBER: KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S):
H :J-.~-i,~-'1 -6s'1'"
APPLICANT (if other than owner) ~3 '13 ''JC ).).1·.;
NAME: EXISTING LAND USE(S):
s ·-~ i -i=,_ --i-, (J .. Je-,· .,.
7 /
COMPANY (if applicable): PROPOSED LAND USE(S):
,, ,~ . i .. r:' ·1. /) -L . lc..-.~i:."') ,
ADDRESS: EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION:
R.,~ -,·J,, ~ l' u! .t:: ..... ._ ) { r::,P. ........ , J.,,~
, /
CITY: ZIP: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION
(if applicable):
fv IA
TELEPHONE NUMBER
EXISTING ZONING: R-8
CONT ACT PERSON PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable):
NAME: R., , .. , r::, '· _I, ., . ,-•,.c, .,,
SITE AREA (in square feet): _;;-I . i)i) 7
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE
COMPANY (if applicable): DEDICATED: 0 c. __ .,, .,, J, C.",..,,.,...:,."' ,·h.t-,...--f", "'t· .-. ~ ' SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS:
ADDRESS: ,;z. ,, l,'1
>-j I ?
q
K.-u.,hi,cr-GI".:! , /L PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET
CITY: ZIP:
ACRE (if applicable): 5, )-l
J:'>s~ .. ~h =~ "16 c ;. , NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable):
V
TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS:
1-f
NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable):
'-1-,.-,) "Fl,_ -,; 1 ~ I r fr c .:l.-c. r, I:-~ , ~ ,: 't' ,..._.;,} ,;.1 ~I i11
Q: weh/ pw/ dev serv / forms/p Jann i ng/masterapp .doc 12/04/06
' OJECT INFORMATION (co1 1ued)
NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable) PROJECT VALUE: 6. <.'C." .. <.' ,v .
D
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS (if applicable): ,._,/p,.
IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF
ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE
SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable):
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): fV /A
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS (if applicable): Nff'
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): tv / j>.
NET FLOOR AREA OF NON·RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if
applicable): tv/A
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE
NEW PROJECT (if applicable): /V /A
D AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE
D AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO
D FLOOD HAZARD AREA
D GEOLOGIC HAZARD
D HABITAT CONSERVATION
D SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES
D WETLANDS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
___ sq.ft.
___ sq.ft.
___ sq.ft.
___ sq.ft.
___ sq.ft.
(Attach leaal descriotion on separate sheet with the followina information included)
SITUATE IN THE w ,';; QUARTER OF SECTION 5 , TOWNSHIP 2-..j, RANGE '.> -, IN THE CITY
OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES
List all land use applications being applied for:
1. 5H,or\r f' ,__,,, ,-3.
2. serA 4.
Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ ___ _
AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP
I, (Print Name/s) _-;;;,_µ,e-'.l'.l..-"-\.-....\.A"""-'==.)_--~--· declare that I am (please check one) __L_ the current owner of the property
involved in this application or the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing
statements and answers herein ontained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
l certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that_/-~~~'/!'~--------
signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be hi~r free and voluntary act for the
uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
(Signature of Owner/Representative)
My appointment expires.: __ /_.2,fa"---;,;_'fi_,_1_':Z_a_~-~---
Q:weh/pw/devserv/torms/planning/masterapp.doc 2 [2/04/06
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
ME
FIRE DEPARTMENT
l\10RAND
October I 0, 200G
Jill Ding, Associate Planner
James Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal j.JL
Blueberry Meadows II Sharl Plat, 1 J/s NE 20th St
Fire Department Comments:
I. A fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single-
family structures. If the building square footage exceeds 3600 square feet in area, the
minimum fire flow increases to 1500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of
the structure.
2. A fire mitigation fee of$488.00 is required for all new single-family structures.
3. Fire department access roadways require a minimum 20-foot wide paved roadway. Fire
department turnarounds are required for roads over 150 feet in length. The turnaround
shall meet the minimum dimensions shown on the attached diagram.
4. All building addresses shall be visible from a public street.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.
i:\blueberrymcadiisp.doc
·~
FIRE APPARAlUS ACCESS ROADS
RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU x '/1.5"-1/30-7000
EMERGENCY VEHICLE TURNAROllNb -CUL-DE-SAC
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Jill Hall
Jan Illian
October 18, 2006
CITY OF RE'\TON MEMO
PUBLIC WORKS
SUBJECT: PREAPPLICATON REVIEW COMMENTS
BLUEBERRY FARM SHORT PLAT
PREAPP NO. 06-117
1828 -NE 20 1
• Street
NOTE ON PRELIMINARY REVIEW COMMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT:
The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application
submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that
information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by
official decision makers (e.g. Hearing Examiner, Boards of Adjustment, Board of Public Works and
City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other
design changes required by the City or made by the applicant.
WATER
l. There is an existing 6-inch water main in l\'E 20th Street and an 8-inch water main in Monterey
Ave NE. Available fire flow in NE 20 1
" Street is 1,400 gpm.
2. A water main extension will be required onsite. Exter,gion of an S men m NE-"20* may be
... te(inire~ feating dk Sile-?
3. All new construction must have a fire hydrant capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 gpm and
must be located within 300 feet of each strncture. New hydrants will be required to be installed as
part of the water main extension on site.
4. The proposed project is located in the 435 Water Pressure Zone and is inside Aquifer Protection
Zone 2. Static pressure in the area 1s approximately 70 psi.
5. The Water System Development Charges (SOC) is $1,956 per new building lot. These are
payable at the time the utility construction permit is issued. Credit will be given for the existing
residences connected to water.
6. All short plats shall provide a separate water service to each building lot prior to recording of the
short plat.
SANITARY SEWER
1. There is an existing 8-inch sewer main fronting the property in NE 20"' Street and an 8-inch
main adjacent to the west side of the site.
2. Separate side sewers are required. Minimum slope shall be 2%.
Blueberry Meadow II Short Plat
Page 2 ofl
3. The Sanitary Sewer System Development Charges (SOC) is $1,017 per new building lot. These
are payable at the time the utility construction permit is issued. Credit will be given for existing
residences connected to sewer.
4. All short plats shall provide a separate sewer stub to each building lot prior to recording of the
short plat.
5. Existing septic system shall be pumped and abandoned in accordance with King County
Department of Health.
6. This parcel is subject to two Special Assessment Districts. NE 20"' & Jones SAD is based on
square footage. The rate is site square footage x a rate of0.27926559. West Kennydale SAD is
based on a rate of# new Jots x $1,050. Payment of these fees wilJ be required prior to issuance
of utility construction permit.
SURFACE WATER
I. A preliminary drainage plan and drainage report will be required with the site plan application.
The report shall address detention and water quality requirements as outlined in the 1990 King
County Surface Water Manual. All core and any special requirements shall be contained in the
report. If preliminary calculations show detention will be required under the 1990 King County
Surface Water Manual, staff wilJ recommend a condition that the project comply with the 2005
King County Surface Water Design Manual to meet both detention (Conservation Flow control -
a.k.a. Level 2) and water quality improvements.
2. Applicant shall submit separate structural plans for review and approval under a separate
building permit for vaults if applicable. Special inspection from the building department is
required.
3. The preferred method of storm discharge in Aquifer Protection Zone 2 is infiltration, if soils
permit. A geotechnical report is required.
4. Roof drains are required to be tightlined to the storm system within the short plat if infiltration is
not feasible.
5. The Surface Water System Development Charges (SDC) are $759 per new building lot. These
are payable at the time the utility construction permit is issued. Credit will be given for existing
residences.
TRANSPORTATION
I. The traffic mitigation fee of $75 per additional generated trip shall be assessed per new single
family home at a rate of 9.57 trips. ($75 x 9.57 x I = $717 .75)
2. Half street improvements in NE 20"' including, but not limited to paving, sidewalks, curb &
gutter, storm drainage, street signs, and street lights are required.
3. Private streets are allowed up to six lots or less with not more than 4 lots not abutting the right of
way. A 26-foot easement with 20 feet of pavement is required.
4. All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Undergrounding
Ordinance. If three or more poles are required to be moved by the development design, all
existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground.
Blueberry Meadow II Short Plat
Page3 of 3
GENERAL COMMENTS
I. All plans shall conform to the Renton Draftmg Standards.
2. When approval of preliminary plat is granted. please submit permit application, tliree (3) copies
of utility drawings, two (2) sets of street hghtmg plans, two (2) copies of the drainage report, an
itemized cost of construction estimate and application fee at the counter on the sixth floor. A fee
worksheet is attached for your use, but prior to preparing a check, it is recommended to call 425-
430-7266 for a fee estimate as generated by the permit system.
The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the
estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $ I 00,000 but less than $200,000, and 3% of
anything over $200,000. Half the fee must be paid upon application.
3. Separate permits and fees for water meters, side sewers, irrigation meters, and storm drainage
connections are required.
4. The site is located in Aquifer Protection Zone 2 and may be subject to additional requirements
per City code. Constructed secondary contamment may be required if more than 20 gallons of
regulated hazardous materials will be present at the new facility (RMC 4-3-050H2d(i)). Certain
uses require operating permits (RMC 4-9-015). A fill source statement (RMC 4-4-060L4) is
required if more than 100 cubic yards of fill material will be imported to the project site.
Construction Activity Standards (Rl\1C 4-4-030C7) shall be followed if during construction,
more than 20 gallons of hazardous materials will be stored on site or vehicles will be fueled on
site. Surface Water Management Standards (RMC 4-6-030E2 and 3)--Biofilters, stormwater
conveyance, and water quality ponds may require a groundwater protection liner. Impervious
surfaces shall be provided for areas subject to vehicular use or storage of chemicals.
5. Rockeries/Retaining Walls. All rockeries or retaining walls, greater than 4 feet in height to be
constructed as part of this site will require a separate building permit and shall have the
following separate note be included on the civil plan: "A licensed engineer with geo technical
expertise must be retained for proposed rockeries greater than four feet in height. The
engineer must monitor rockery construction and verify in writing that the rockery was
constructed in general accordance with ARC standards and with his/her supplemental
recommendations, in a professional manner and of competent and suitable material.
Written verification by the engineer must be provided to the City of Renton public works
inspector prior to approval of an occupancy permit or plat approval for the project. A
separate bnilding permit will be required."
6. A separate utility pennit to cut and cap existing utilities to existing structures on site will be
required as part of the demolition permit.
cc: Kayren Kittrick
DATE:
TO:
CITY OF RENTON
Planning/Building/Public Works
MEMORANDUM
October 19, 2006
Pre-Application File No. 06-117
FROM: Jill K. Ding, Senior Planner, x7219
Blueberry Meadows II Short Plat SUBJECT:
General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above-referenced
development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are
based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the
codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this
summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing
Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator, and City Council).
Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes
required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable
sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for
$50.00 plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall.
Project Proposal: The subject property is located at 1828 NE 20th Street. The proposal is to
subdivide the exi 9ting 50,110 square foot (1.15 acre) lot zoned Residential -8 (R-8) dwelling units per
acre into 4 lots for single-family residences. Access for the proposed lots will be provided through a
proposed 26-foot wide private access easement onto NE 20th Street.
Site History: Three previous pre-application meetings have been held regarding the subject property
(PREOS-008, PRE05-018, and PRE05-071 ). In each of the pre-application meetings it was disclosed
that the City's critical areas maps identify a wetland on the project site. A wetland report prepared by
Ellisport Engineering was previously submitted with the previous pre-application materials and a
wetland report prepared by Del Moral & Associates was submitted with the current pre-application
packet. Both wetland reports indicate that a wetland may have previously existed on the subject site,
however the hydrological conditions have subsequently changed and a wetland is no longer located
on the site.
A Grading License was issued on the subject site on September 5, 2006 subject to the condition that a
wetland study be submitted and all grading activities occur outside of the delineated wetland. The
Grading License is currently under appeal based on the contention by the appellant that fill was placed
within a wetland.
Zoning/Density Requirements: The subject property is located within the Residential -8 dwelling
units per acre (R-8) zoning designation. The density range required in the R-8 zone is a minimum of
4.0 to a maximum of 8.0 dwelling units per acre (du/ac).
The method of calculating net density is as follows:
A calculation of the number of housing units and/or lots that would be allowed on a property
after critical areas and public rights-of-way and legally recorded private access easements are
subtracted from the gross area (gross area minus streets and critical areas multiplied by
allowable housing units per acre). Required critical area buffers and public and private alleys
shall not be subtracted from gross acres for tlie purpose of net density calculations.
The area within the proposed access easement must be deducted from the gross property
square footage.
The proposal for 4 units on the property after subtracting the area for the proposed 26-foot wide
private access easement and cul-de-sac turnaround arrives at a net density of approximately 4.9 du/ac
(4 I 0.81 = 4.9), which is within the density allowed for the R-8 zone.
All square footages of areas to be deducted (access easement) must be provided at the time of formal
land use application.
Blueberry Meadows II Short Pl:
October 19, 2006
Page 2 of 4
-Application Meeting
Development Standards: The R-8 zone permits one residential structure/ unit per lot. Detached
accessory structures are permitted at a maximum number of two per lot at 720 square feet each, or
one per lot at 1,000 square feet in size.
Minimum Lot Size. Width and Depth -The minimum lot size permitted in the R-8 is 4,500 square feet
for lots greater than 1 acre in size. A minimum lot width of 50 feet for interior lots and 60 feet for corner
lots, as well as a minimum lot depth of 65 feet, is also required.
Land area included in private access easements shall not be included in lot area calculations.
Building Standards -The R-8 zone allows a maximum building coverage of 35% of the lot area or
2,500 square feet, whichever is greater for lots over 5,000 square feet in size. Lots under 5,000
square feet in size are permitted a maximum building coverage of 50% of the lot area. Building height
is restricted to 30 feet and 2-stories. Detached accessory structures must remain below a height of 15
feet and one-story. The gross floor area must be less than that of the primary structure. Accessory
structures are also included in building lot coverage calculations. Building standards would be
confirmed at the time of building permit review.
Setbacks -Setbacks are the minimum required distance between the building footprint and the
property line and any private access easement. The required setbacks in the R-8 zone are 15 feet in
front for the primary structure and 20 feet in front for the attached garage, 20 feet in the rear, 5 feet on
interior side yards, and 15 feet on side yards along streets for the primary structure and 20 feet on side
yards along streets for the attached garage. Setbacks will be confirmed at the time of building permit
review.
Setbacks must be measured from the edges of access easements.
Access/Parking: The proposal is to access the lots through a 26-foot private access easement. Each
lot is required to accommodate off street parking for a minimum of two vehicles. Appropriate shared
maintenance and access agreement/easements will be required between lots with shared access.
Private streets are allowed for access to six or fewer lots, provided at least two of the six lots abut a
public right-of-way. The street is to include a minimum easement width of 26 feet with 20 feet of
paving. ·'
Private driveways may serve a maximum of two lots and must have a minimum easement width of 20
feet with 12 feet of paving.
Addresses of lots along private streets are to be visible from the public street by provision of a sign
stating all house numbers, and the sign is to be located at the intersection of the private street and the
public street.
A cul-de-sac turnaround is required for dead end streets over 300 feet in length. The cul-de-sac shall
have a minimum paved radius of 45 feet with a right-of-way radius of 50 feet.
Full street improvements (curb, gutter and 6-foot wide sidewalk) along the site's NE 20'" Street
frontage will be required for the short plat. The applicant may elect to ask the Planning/Building/Public
Works Administrator for a waiver of off site street improvements. Please contact Jan Illian at (425)
430-7216 for additional information regarding the waiver process.
Driveway Grades: The maximum driveway slopes cannot exceed 15%, provided that driveways
exceeding 8% are to provide slotted drains at the lower end of the driveway. If the grade exceeds
15%, a variance from the Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator is required.
Landscaping and Open Space: Tree requirements for short plats include at least two trees of a City
approved species with a minimum caliper of 1 1 /2 inches per tree must be planted in the front yard or
planting strip of every lot prior to building occupancy.
Significant Tree Retention: A tree inventory and a tree retention plan shall be provided with the
formal land use application. The tree retention plan must show preservation of at least 25% of
significant trees [those with a minimum diameter of 8" (evergreen) or 12" (deciduous) when measured
four feet above grade], and indicate how proposed building footprints will be sited to accommodate
preservation of significant trees that will be retained.
Pre06-l I 7 (R-8 4-lot short plat).doc
...
Blueberry Meadows II Shor
October 19, 2006
Page 3 o/4
Pre-Application Meeting
The following species are exempted from the retention requirements outside of critical areas:
All Populus species including cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa), quaking aspen (Populus
tremuloides), lombardy poplar (Populus nigra "ltalica"), etc.
All Alnus species which includes red alder (Alnus oregona), black alder {Alnus glutinosa),
white alder (Alnus rhombifolia), etc.
Salix species which includes weeping willow (Salix babylonica), etc., unless along a stream
bank and away from paved areas.
All Platanus species which include London plane tree {Platanus acerifolia), American
sycamore, buttonwood (Platanus occidentalis), etc.
Sensitive Areas: Based on the City's critical areas maps, it appears the site is mapped with a
regulated wetland. The applicant submitted a wetland report prepared by Del Moral & Associates,
dated September 22, 2006. The report concludes that a wetland previously existed on the project site,
but due to changes in hydrologic conditions there is no longer a wetland on the site. The report did
indicate that a category 3 wetland had been identified and delineated to the south of the project site,
the delineation was prepared by Del Moral & Associates. Based on that delineation, it appears that a
portion of the category 3 wetland buffer extends onto the project site, although this was no clarified in
the wetland report.
RMC 4-3-050F.7 provides that the City may require independent review of an applicant's
wetland report at the applicant's expense. Due to the lack of resolution regarding whether a
wetland or wetland buffer is located on the project site, the City will require that the applicant
pay for an independent secondary review of the submitted wetland reports.
'-For wetlands present, the applicable buffer widths based on the category of the wetland are required
(Category 1 -100 ft.; Category 2 -50 ft.; and Category 3 -25 ft.). Please refer to RMC 4-3-050.M.
for additional regulations on wetlands.
Based on City records, the site is located within an "Aquifer Protection Area (Zone 2)". If more than
100 cubic yards of fill is proposed a Source Statement is required for each source location from which
imported fill will be obtained. However, location within the Aquifer Protection Area does not trigger
Environmental Review.
Environmental Review: Short plats typically do not require SEPA as short plats are exempt from
environmental review unless covered by water or contain critical areas. If it is determined that a
wetland is located on the project site, then Environmental (SEPA) Review would be required.
Permit Requirements: Preliminary short plats of four or fewer lots (witlh or without environmental
(SEPA) review) would be processed administratively. The land use process would be completed
within an estimated time frame of 6 to 8 weeks for preliminary short plat approval. The application fee
is $1,000.00 with Y, off subsequent applications. If SEPA review is required, the fee is $200 (1/2 of
$400.00 full fee) if the project value is less than $100,000 and is a $500.00 fee (1/2 of $1000.00 full
fee) if the project. value is over $100,000. The applicant will be required to install a public information
sign on the property. Detailed information regarding the land use application submittal is provided in
the attached handouts.
Once preliminary approval is received, the applicant must complete the required improvements and
satisfy any conditions of the preliminary approval before the plat can be recorded. The newly created
lots may be sold only after the plat has been recorded.
Fees: In addition to the applicable building and construction permit fees, the following mitigation fees
would be required prior to the recording of the plat.
• A Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per each new average daily
trip attributable to the project; and,
• A Fire Mitigation Fee based on $488.00 per new single-family residence.
A handout listing all of the City's Development related fees in attached for your review.
Pre06-l 17 (R-8 4-lot short plat).doc
Blueberry Meadows II Short Pia
October 19, 2006
Page 4 o/4
Application Meeting
Expiration: Upon preliminary short plat approval, the preliminary short plat approval is valid for two
years with a possible one-year extension.
Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The existing development is localed within the
Residential Single Family (RSF) Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation. The following proposed
policies are applicable to the proposal:
Land Use Element
Objective LU-FF: Encourage re-investment and rehabilitation of existing housing, and development
of new residential plats resulting in quality neighborhoods that:
1. Are planned at urban densities and implement Growth Management targets,
2. Promote expansion and use of public transportation; and
3. Make more efficient use of urban services and infrastructure.
Policy LU-147. Net development densities should fall within a range of 4.0 to 8.0 dwelling units per
acre in Residenti?I Single Family neighborhoods.
Policy LU-148. A minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet should be allowed on in-fill parcels of less
than one acre (43,560 sq. ft.) in single-family designations. Allow a reduction on lot size to 4,500
square feet on parcels greater than one acre to create an incentive for aggregation of land. The
minimum lot size is not intended to set the standard for density in the designation, but to provide
flexibility in subdivision/plat design and facilitate development within the allowed density range.
Policy LU-149. lot size should exclude private sidewalks, easements, private road, and driveway
easements, except alley easements.
Policy LU-150. Required setbacks should exclude public or private legal access areas, established
through or to a lot, and parking areas.
Policy LU-152. Single-family lot size, lot width, setbacks, and impervious surface should be sufficient
to allow private open space, landscaping to provide buffers/privacy without extensive fencing, and
sufficient area for maintenance activities.
Policy LU-154. Interpret development standards to support new plats and infill project designs
incorporating street locations, lot configurations, and building envelopes that address privacy and
quality of life for existing residents.
Community Design Element
I
Policy CD-12. Infill development, defined as new short plats of nine or fewer lots, should be
encouraged in oraer to add variety, updated housing stock, and new vitality to neighborhoods.
Policy CD-13. Infill development should be reflective of the existing character of established
neighborhoods even when designed using different architectural styles, and/or responding to more
urban setbacks, height or lot requirements. Infill development should draw on elements of existing
development such as placement of structures, vegetation, and location of entries and walkways, to
reflect the site planning and scale of existing areas.
cc: Jennifer Henning
Pre06-I I 7 (R-8 4-lot short plat).doc
.. •·
C4 · 32 T24N R5E E 1/2
. ;-~117\ij. ~. ····· .·· .~> ..... -\-~~----~ ,~~ .
. . ;3)~ 1~ h St R"'-8.
R-c.8 R=s\.·8 ~ ~E 271th R~ .. ·. ··. ~:.____ St. _J .·_ .R~B.
.NE 27th Sl.
R-1
~
Q_
~
CD
I
Ct'.
(D w '.:====··=·· ~·_) ---s
I Z. 'R-8
O'.'. <ii ~ .
. . w
Q)
.P
~
Q)
I>
-."SC
_,, C/'.J.
(l) -p
-0 ""' = z --
-;(X)..,-:ai
·1&~
ro NE
. ' Ct'. •
/
/
\( __ _
ZONING
900
Q)
> .«;
p
CJ
. _Q)
.. "O
~:=~ 8
"° : «:
NE 24th
16th
R-8
----Rent.on Oit.r J.hnlt,11
... ·····-i
:w; >·-·
«:···
R-1
R
R-8 NE . tl <.n
Rc-c8;
"' z
e:
. t<I
-~-R--8-'-~
N:E tQth' R ;:i
NEr\13 h ..
R-8CP
D4
P/8/PW TECHNICAL SERVICES
02/16/06
5 T23N R5E E 1/2
5305
. '· '
DENSITY
WORKSHEET DECO 5 2006
NECEiVSD
City of Renton Development Services Division
1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98055
Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax 425-430-7231
1. Gross area of property: 1. --"'"5-'--1 "'0""6-'--7 ____ square feet
2. Deductions: Certain areas are excluded from density calculations.
These include:
Public streets**
Private access easements**
Critical Areas*
Total excluded area:
3. Subtract line 2 from line 1 for net area:
4. Divide line 3 by 43,560 for net acreage:
5. Number of dwelling units or lots planned:
____ square feet
18.039 square feet
____ square feet
2. __ 1,_..8"'-0""3"-'9"---_ square feet
3. __ 33,028 _ square feet
4. 0.76 acres
5. ___ _,_4 __ . ._· units/lots
6. Divide line 5 by line 4 for net density:
units/acre
6. -~5.=2=6~ .. __ = dwelling
*Critical Areas are defined as "Areas determined by the City to be not suitable for
development and which are subject to the City's Critical Areas Regulations
including very high landslide areas, protected slopes, wetlands or floodways."
Critical areas buffers are not deducted/excluded.
** Alleys (public or private) do not have to be excluded.
C:\Land Projects 2004\06081 \density.doc Last updated: 12/04/2006
Blueberry Meadows Preliminary Short Plat
Project Narrative
Project Proposal Description:
·0rtr(tc:r·,< ·;c
···. / ..... : -:··;(.;'.~\/\~~/Vit-Jc;
nr::c o 5 2nas
t'
The proposed BI ue Berry Meadows Sho11 Plat consists of a 1.17 acre site located north of
NE 20th Street in the City of Renton. The site is located on tax parcel, #3343903201.
The existing Land Use of this parcel is Single Family Residential. The total acreage is
approximately I .17 acres. The site will be accessed off of NE 20th Street. The zoning of
the subject property and surrounding lots, per City of City of Renton, is R-8. A Short Plat
permit and all its required permits will be needed for the project.
The site is being proposed for 4 Lots. He site should be a balanced cut/fill with any
onsite excavation being placed on the lots. Approximately 4 apple trees will be removed
dnring construction. Construction costs could range from 100,000-150,000 for the site.
The current appraised land value is 124,000, but should be worth 600,000 to 800,000
after final approval.
A small job shack may be needed onsite during construction.
Soil:
The soil in the area consisted of an upper organic silt/sand topsoil layer that was about
one foot thick. Below the topsoil were l .acustrine and Outwash deposits consisting of
stiff clayey silts and medium dense sands. Groundwater was found in all test pits ranging
from 6-8 feet deep'
Lot Sizes:
There will be 4 new lots ranging in size from 11,333 to 16,593 square feet.
Special Site Features:
The site is near an offsite wetland located along the west side of the property
Adjacent Land Use:
The adjacent land use is Single familv residential. No Land will be dedicated to the City.
Blueberry Meadows Preliminary Short Plat
Project Construction Mitigation
Project Construction Mitigation:
.• , . /. '" '''"(),'6 ~-b.)
The project will hopefully begin construction by April 1st 2007, with hours being 7:00 am
tO 6:00 pm or whatever City code allows. The proposed hall route will be from 1-405 to
Ne 30th Street, up Ke!lllewick Pl \:F and l\F 27'h Street and then right on Aberdeen
Avenue NE. South on Aberdeen A \'e l\E to NE 20th Street. Then right on NE 20th Street
to the site and vice versa.
The road on NE 20th Street will be swept nightly and the site will be watered if dusty. All
hauling will be restricted to daylight hours only. Flaggers will be placed on NE 20th
Street if deemed necessary.
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
City of Renton Development Services Division
1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055
Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax 425-430-7231
PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST:
: ··'.·•-, '. / <
/)fr
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to
consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the
quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the
agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be
done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal.
Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your
proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most
precise information known, or give the best description you can.
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases,
you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need
to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer. or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write
"do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary
delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark
designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can
assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of
time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal
or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your
answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant
adverse impact
USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS:
Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not
apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D).
For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the
checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal,"
"proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively.
C:\Land Projects R2\2006\06081\dwg\envchlst.doc12/05106
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable Blue Berry Meadows
2. Name of applicant: Master Builder Construction
Terry Dutro
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
10711 SE 30TH ST.
BELLEVUE, WA 98004
(425) 454-6340
4. Date checklist prepared 12/01/06
5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable) Spring 2007.
7. Do you have any plans for future additions. expansion, or further activity related to or connected
with this proposal? If yes, explain. No.
8 List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared,
directly related to this proposal. A wpography map, soils report, conceptual utility plan, and
Wetland Delineation
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals
directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No.
10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
Not Known
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the
project and site. Short plat a 1.17 Acre site into 4 lots for single family residences.
C:\Land Projects R2\2006\06081\dwg\envchlst.doc 2
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise
location of your proposed project. including a street address, if any, and section, township, and
range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries
of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if
reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not
required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this
checklist.
Site Address
1828 NORTHEAST 20TH STREET
RENTON, WA 98056
TAX# 334390-3201
Located in Section. 5, Township 23N. Range. 5E WM.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. EARTH
a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous,
other . Flat
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) 15%
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat,
muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any
prime farmland. Lacustrine and outwash deposits. See soils report.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so,
describe. See soils report.
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed.
Indicate source of fill. Minimal
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally
describe. Run off will be directed to silt fences and perk facilities. It is anticipated very little
runoff will leave the site.
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project
construction (for example. asphalt or buildings)? 0.71 acres
C:\Land Projects R2\2006\06081\dwg\envchlst.doc 3
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion. or other impacts to the earth, if any:
Run off will be directed to silt fences and perk facilities.
2. AIR
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile,
odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If
any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Normal emissions as
the result of construction of access roads and 4 single family homes.
b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so,
generally describe. None
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Keep
site wet during dry season to minimize dust.
3. WATER
a. Surface Water:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-
round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type
and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into.
There is an unclassified stream on the property to the North and a small wetland offsite to
the south west.
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described
waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
A private drive will be constructed along the existing driveway that runs easterly of the
offsite wetland.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from
surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected
Indicate the source of fill material None
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No
C:\Land ProJects R2\20D6\06081 \dwg\envchlst.doc 4
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan
No.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No
b. Ground Water:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn. or will water be discharged to ground water? Give
general description, purpose. and approximate quantities if known. No water will be
withdrawn but some amounts of surface water will be perked back to the ground.
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other
sources, if any (for example· Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following
chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of
such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of
animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. No waste material will be
discharged. The project will be on the City of Renton's sewer system.
c. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and
disposal, if any (include quantities. if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water
flow into other waters, If so, describe.
Water from roads and roof drains will be collected in a closed system and directed to a
combination wet detention vault and released at the appropriate rate to the existing city
storm system in NE 20 St.
2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if
any: Water from roads and roof drains will be collected in a closed system and directed to
a combination wet detention vault and released at the appropriate rate to the existing city
storm system in NE 20 St.
4. PLANTS
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
_x_ deciduous tree: alder, maple. aspen, other
__ evergreen tree: fir. cedar pine other
C:\Land Proiects R2\2006\06081\dwg\envchlst.doc 5
shrubs
grass
pasture
__ crop or grain
__ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other
__ water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other
__ other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? All vegetation will be
removed for road and house construction.
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None know.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance
vegetation on the site, if any Landscape and street trees will be planted per the City
requirements.
5. ANIMALS
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known
to be on or near the site
Birds: hawk, heron, eagle songbirds, other ________ _
Mammals: deer, bear, elk. beaver, other __________ _
Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other ______ _
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None known.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain
No
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any
None.
6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the
completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating,
manufacturing, etc. Electric & natural gas for lights and heat.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so,
generally describe. No.
C:\Land Projects R2\2D06\06081 \dwg\envchlst.doc
6
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal?
List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: All available
measures required by code.
7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk
of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this
proposal? If so, describe. Normal risk of fire in a residential neighborhood.
1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
Police, medic and fire services
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors in the new homes.
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic,
equipment, operation, other)? Noise from 1-405 which is to the west of the site.
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a
short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic. construction, operation, other)?
Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction equipment for road,
utility and residential construction.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
Construction work will only be accomplished during times as specified by the City.
8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
The site is currently cleared and the adjacent properties are single family residences.
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
No.
c. Describe any structures on the site. None.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No.
C:\Land Projects R2\2006\06081\dwg\envchlst.doc 7
e What is the current zoning classification of the site? R-8
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Single Family.
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site?
N/A
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so,
specify. No.
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Typical
for 4 single family residences
J. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None.
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None.
L Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land
uses and plans, if any: ProJect will provide 4 single family residences. Adjacent properties
are single family residences
9. HOUSING
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle,
or low-income housing. 4 single family middle income housing units.
b. Approximately how many units. if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low-income housing None.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None.
10. AESTHETICS
C·\Land Projects RZ\2006\06081 \dwg\envchlst.doc 8
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the
principal exterior building material(s) proposed. The maximum building height is 35' or as
the city requires. Building materials would consist of wood, brick and metal.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Necessary conditions,
covenants and restrictions
11. LIGHT AND GLARE
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly
occur? Lights from 3 single family homes.
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?
No.
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None.
12. RECREATION
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?
May Creek Park and Kennydale Lions Park.
b. Would the proposed proJect displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe.
No.
c Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation. including recreation
opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:
None.
13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state. or local
preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe.
No.
C:\Land Projects R2\2006\06081 \dwg\envchlst.doc 9
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or
cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None.
14. TRANSPORTATION
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site. and describe proposed access to the
existing street system. Show on site plans. if any. The project will access from NE 20'" St.
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the
nearest transit stop?
Walk approx. 3 blocks E on NE 20th St
Total walking is 0.43 miles
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the
project eliminate? Approximately 2 for each new lot None would be eliminated.
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or
streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or
private? No.
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation?
If so, generally describe No.
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If
known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. The project will generate
approximately 36 new trips per day the majority of travel between 7-9 a.m. and 4-6 p.m ..
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
None
15. PUBLIC SERVICES
a. Would the project result 1n an increased need for public services (for example fire
protection, police protection. health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe.
An increased need for public services associated with 4 single family middle income
residences.
C:\Land Projects R2\2006\D6081 \dwg\envchlst.doc 10
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any.
None.
16. UTILITIES
a. Circle utilities currently available at the sit~Cwatei'C@fuse serv1@:::,
~ septic system, other.
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and
the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be
needed. None.
C. SIGNATURE
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and
complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance
that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or
willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
Proponent: _.~~~--'J..~~""~Q.,_,.,..,_,to,,,,.=. __ _
Name Printed: ~R~•~"'~-~Fr~t=J~,.=-£~;=~~~=•="'~---
Date:
C:\Land ProJects R2\2006\06081 \dwg\envchlst.doc
11
·w:: \
DEc I! 52006
'','h ·;' .. ;,_:.t,
September 22, 2006
RE EYaluation of Propert, :\oith of 1828 l\IE 20"' SL, Renton, WA 98056
Mr. Terry Dutro
Owner: l\1asterbuilder Construction
10711 SE JO''' Sr
Bellevue, WA 98004
Dear Mr. Dutro:
On September 2 L 20D6, I visited the suhJect prope1iy (herein called the "Core property" for con-
venience.) As you know, it 1s within 2011 fe,cl of a stream located to the west The City of
Renton has requested that you detem1111c the d,stances to existing wetlands in the event that any
are sufficiently close to affect your prop,·:t\. eirher directly or because of buffer requirements.
The site is JOO ft bv 355 ft (1.15 acresL \lost ,,!'this property has been cleared, with exceptions
of some fruit trees on the north, severa, D,:,uc!'as firs on the south, and a na!TOW band of very
young alders on the west. An access road lcadint( nonli from NE 20'" St forms the eastern edge,
Ti11s su1Tounding area is undergoing cu11sidc'rab:e development. There arc new homes northeast
and east of this propeny, The proper-I\ to the south, along "IE 20 1h St will soon have a new
home. Propen1cs to the west, current!\ fields. appear to be under environmental investigation
that would occur before development t sec bclu11 ).
I reviewed the report by Ellispo11 Engincrnn~ tk1t described wetland conditions on thrs propeny
and its associated areas (known as the Gordly a11d Core Properties in that repori). This report
was conducted in October, 2004 by Ms Anne Sccthoft Recently, I reviewed the prope11y to the
south for Mr. Daniel Nguyen (report to \fr '\gu\ en dated August 30, 2006; I believe that it has
been llied with the City). I dete1111ined th,n a small wetland exists north of the Nguyen property,
bu! did not examine the extent of that 11 ctiand because it \\as not on the subject property. llow-
ever, I did dctenrnne that by existing rnics. tiic ,., u]and was a Category 3 wetland, described as a
wetland that is se\'crely disturbed.
This report describes my fo1dings conctT11,11cc I cgctation on and adjacent to the Core property. In
particular, I measured the distance fro111 tl1c p1uperty to existing wetlands and examined the
wetland lO the south of the property in 11:urc ,k:ci,i
:\IETHODS
Wetland delinearion or the nonhem eds,· ,11· lhc' wetland fragment to the south of the property
was made usmg the Wasl1ington State D.e11t ,,f' Fcology manual (Wetlands Identification and
Delineation t\fanual. 1997), as rcqu , '1\ t:1, Citv of Renton. To be a wetland, the srtc must
sin1ultaneous!y Uemonstr~H,.: positi\'c' 1:;,lil·,1tl',)i-:s or h~:Jric soil, hydrophylic \·egctalinn ;rnd \\Tt-
land hydrologv (saturatroJC for a s1g11111,Cc111 1w1·tion of' the growing season) The lack or direct
positive indicauons o( 11 ct land hydr,,L,.c\ ,k,cs not. by rtscll', indicated that a srtc is an uphnci 3l
thrs time of year. Soil conditions, to1,1,~c1,1pl1\. type of I egetatron and other criteria may indicate
that soils are saturated for a s1gnifican: p,·:-n11111 .:,fthe growing season.
An adJacent wetland was delineated,,,, l·ll1sporl Engineering (letter to Mr. \lguyen, May 31,
2006 by Anne Seethoff). but that lcl'.c'i d1cl 11ut provide an exact delineation. It was based on the
2004 repori (''Gordly-Core Propertiec" i. !1; Ill\ report to Mr. Nguyen, I delineated the southern
edge or the "'illomhardhack thicket l,x: '" close as 5 feet from his propcriy, and used the
southern edge or a ditch leading to th,s 11,:1,I: ,\ ,'s' as the edge of the wetland. I drd not imestrgate
the t\\ o ditches\\ rthin the wetland.
This wetland was determined to be a 1,·cr1cc,\11 3 wetland by Ellispon Engineering and I con-
firn1ed this finding. Their findings noted substantial human-induced disturbances, altered
hydrology, changes in soils, and chan~cs 111 :,q,ctation, The undcrstoryofthe scrnb-slmrb area is
disturbed by the activities of children v Ir,, nl:1y in this site. My investigation confinned the
finding that that the wetland is a Cakcrn1 3 11 C'tlands and is by altered soil (some fill, drkes and
ditches), altered hydrology (ditches) ,1nc; crltcr,cd vegetation (many exotic species). In Renton,
such a wetland requires a 25 ft buffer
Along the eastern edge of the propcr11, 1he,c rs a berm forn1ed by excavations associated with
the installation of a sewer line. This lwrn: "' dominated by young red alder and weedy vegeta-
tion. \Vest of this area. an other fo111 l:"" c:cLneatcd the eastern extend of wetlands on the adJa-
ce111 property. Flags \\'ere dated Septc:11> .. ·r i .J. :'006. These nags appear to be accurately placed
and included an eastern extension in a ,L1l'!1 fl,e sunounding upland vegetation was dominated
by Himalayan blackberry.
Using my delineation of the northern cdg,, u1· tire southern wetland, and the flagged delineation
of the wetland lo the west.! measured 11:c: drctance directly from the relevant property Imes.
RESl.LTS
General Co11ditio11s
Recent rains had wet the soil thorouglrh. 1!J,1ugi1 noL necessarily to create saturated conditions if
these can develop. The bulk of the proper,1 Ire:, been cleared and filled. The Ellispori repori,
conducted rn October 2004, determined tl1a1 despite hydrophytic vegetation and hydric soil (as
indicated by a Munsell color deLennii:a1i,1n 1. 11J,, l'egetation along the western edge of the Core
propcriy was not wetlands because the soil -,1 ;r, 11llt saturated. My examination of this boundary
agrees with that determination. This srtc ;n,r) lr,1,e once been a wetland, but recent and substan-
tial hydrological have removed the wetLrnd !ndrology. It appears that the water table in this area
has dropped, and that the hydrophyiic , egclatiu:1 noted by Ellispori is a relict, as is the soil
chroma. ln my study, I found that soil cirrnrna had also increased in value (less black) and that in
most cases no longer indicated hydric cumlrtions (sec below). Vegetation, while st!II hydro-
phytic, was less so. Small-fn11tcd buln1,h. u1111111un in 2004, was reduced to a single, very sickly
plant. This obligate species would be' e,pccrcd to be the first to die out if the water table
dropped.
In contrast. species sucli as the P·acific \\ 11 ,m 111e deep~rooted and c,rn pc:rsist for decades if the
\I atcr level does not drop too tar Tl111;_ tlL· ,:cJ to the south of the sub_1ect propert) retains !lie
appearance of a wctlancl. but it has shn11:k s11hstcJ11lially.
Wetland Edge near Somhem Bou11da1y
Along the southern edge or the properl\. 1 luokc:J at soil and vegetation to deten11i11e if this edge
contained wetlands The first sampk I I 1. near I l1e southeast comer. had soil color at 18 inches
that was distinctly upland in nature I 111YR -l ~I, even though the vegetation was hydrophytic.
The soil was moist and well drained. cwn after recent heavy rains. The vegetation was domi-
nated by Himalayan blackberry (Sm,, Sec· l,iblc I for Scientific names and wetland indicator
values of species encountered), Pacitic 11·ii]O\\ (20%), creeping buttercup (30%). reed canary
grass (20%) and hardhack (10%). This ,·,Jmb1na1ion of species indicates moist, hea,·ily disturbed
conditions that may be in transition to upi,md
At a second site (II), near the middk uf 1his boundary, the soil was darker (lOYR 2/2), but it
lacked mottles, and thus is not hydric. The s·J:l was moist, not nearly saturated. The vegetation
was hydrophy1ic, here dominated by Pacific l\illow (60%,), with Himalayan blackbeJTy (30%),
creeping buttercup (20%) and some reccl ca11an grass.
The tlmd site (Ill) along this bounda1_, \\ ,1s mowed grass and was not wet at all. The soil was
not hydric (JO'{R 2,2, no mottles), wh1lc liL· \cgetation was mixed pasture grass and weeds.
I searched for the north cm edge of the \\ d1111d suuth of the Core property (the southern edge of
which I had flagged in August for Mr.'\ fll\ c·n i. 1 was surprised to find that what appeared to be
wetland from the vegetation did not hcl\C h\c.11c soil for quite a distance (see later). Ilere, the
hydrology has been altered due to surrc,u11C'ing ckveloprnent and the ditches within the II ell and
were not very wet.
I flagged three points (A-1 on the east) a11c1 A-3 lo the west. The minimum distance from the
southern edge of the subject property 1\ c,s measured to by 40 ft. A survey of these three points
may be provided by the client
Appendix I provides detailed infom1a1.1011 c1bout the wetland and its immediate upland. A-1 is
about 50 ft south of Site II. It is slrough dominilted by Pacific willow with virtually no under~
story. There is some wood fem in pro1,y1cd si1,s Kids now use this area and have trampled it
significantly. Even withrn the wetland. c,md1t1011, were relati,·ely dry. The soil was wet and suf-
ficiently dark to be indicate wetland conditions (J(JYR 211). Withm 5 ft of this site, I deten11ined
the soil to be much lighter in color (JUYR , ~-no mottles), and considerably drier. The vegeta,
tion was disturbed. While willow stili do1C11'1atcd, il was joined by a preponderance of exotics
(]limalayan blackbcJTy, English holly. rc>11e111I ancl some sword fem. These all suggested recent
desiccation of the Slle.
Note that the ditch bcrn een the wetlai'r'. e,J~,· 2nd the Core property also appears to have dried
out. The soil on its bank was not wet a;id 11,:.ln 111 color (lOYR 4/2); the ,·egetat1on on its banks
was Himalayan blackbeiTy and Douglas fir.
Wetland Edge near Wes/em Bou11da1J'
No wetlands occurred along the weslE'rn h,1u11dciry (soil well drained, colors from l OYR3!2 to
l OYR2/2, with no mottles. These values ,u,· cunsistent with the values found at the appropriate
level ( 15-18 1nchc,J b, Eltispo1i Encinc,,,-;,,~ The vegetation along this boundary is dominated
by red alder and grasses_ lt is hydropi!y1 r,, hc11 such vegetation rarely occurs in wetlands_
There is, apparently, a wetland to tbe ,,,,s;, fkcause this area 1s not on the Core property, I did
not sample soi I 01 , egelallon in dctcr1 L Rath er, I accepted the recent wetland flagging, This
boundary appears nhd_ though its easkr11 t'\tcnsion in the ditch that leads from the Core prop-
cny may extend 100 far to the easL
I measured from the western edge 01 U1c C,rc prope1iy al several points to the nearest wetland
boundary, From south to nonb, the d1s1:11'c'es :ire: ov'er 50 fl; 48 ft: 60 ft; 42 fl: and 39 ft
The likely buffer lcir Lbe disturbed \h'lb1d 1,, the wesr is 25 11 (Category 3), so there is unlikely
to be any buffer extending onto the C,11c-p1,1p,:rtv,
Sl,\l\lARY
The Core propeny rnntains no wetland, !he nearest wetlands arc over 40 ft lo the south and no
closer than 39 ft to 1he wesL The strc::n1-a'1,,11n 130 ft lo the west is unlikely to be affected by
development of tlm project. In the co,ir;c nf developmg ihis site_ I recommend that exotic
species (e,g_ holly, 1,y_ reed grass) k' c'l1111111:Jlc'll and that the landscape plan include a prepon-
derance of native trees and shrubs, Th:s ,,, Iii cn!Lrncc the biotic resources of the surroundings,
This concludes my report to you_ Should \c,u have any questions or comments, please feel free
to contact me,
Sincerely,
Ra , .u-tL« /i;f)'/"1J.1
Roger del Moral
, ,,
fable 1. Alphabct1ccl 'ist ofspc·~ies 1:-:-:111,\ h~;lel Moral & Associates ,md their wetland indi-
cator value. OBI = C1i1,a1·s lound 111 \\ da, ,>:[·AC\\= usu:llly Juuml 111 \1cll:rnds: h'\( ~
'Sometimes found 111 wetlands: FACL ,cld,,:n round in wetlands; L\PL ~ ne\'er found in wet-
lands. nc = species not listed in standar,: reJc-rcnces, but value estimated from other sources N.ot \
all of these species are mentioned in th,· tnt _J ·---------
Scientific Name Indicator Growth Common Name
\'aluc Form
A~rostis a/bu _F_\_(_ Grass , red tOJl ________ ~
0grostrs 1~11111s F.\C Grass colonial bentgrass
A/nus rubro ~~-F.\·r-· Tree red alder ------
Ca/\stezia sepmm ==t-;·
1
:,:_1 1\··'c(·.·t···.. Vine/Herb hed~e bind\\eed
Dcrncus cartmo , , Herb Queen Aime's lace
,~D_r_v_o_p_le-r-1s-· -sp-.-----~ F.\ Cf:~\ ,·"_y+--f-.c1-n--+",·v'~o-o~d~f~e-n_1_g_ro __ L_1p--------1
,~-----------·----· ~------+----~-j-~
, Epilobiurn cilrosum =+' F.\C11· Atmual Watson's willo\\herb
Eqmsetum unwise ___ · , · _· r,.F.;\(·.·.cl·_ ~ IJerb field horsetail
Festuca ora1ensis ..,, Grass meadow fescue
Ho!cus /anaws =r rF.··.\.-'l( __ c_,.·l,. Shrub velvet ~g_ra""s~s~-------~,
Hyooclweris rud1caro Herb fool's dandelion ~ ---.
_[lex aquz(o/ium ·--------j' ... ~l _A_( Shrub English holly
Juncus ef(irsus F.\CII. Graminoid common rush · ·-
Phalarrs arnnd111aceu F\CTI Grass reed canarvgrass ~
, P/a111azo lonceoiara ! -{AC____ Herb English plantain
7oh·s1ichum 1111111i111m ~--,.1
1
_.,:_~-.t
1
... ,. Fern sword fern -----·
Pse11do1s11za menziesii I "':c Tree Domdas fir
Ranunculus repens F.\C\\' Herb creeping buttercup
Rubus c/isrolor r \C'L Shrub Himalavan blackbenv +-c:=='--+====-=~..C..C.'-'--------1 Salix lucida (/asranc/ro) FAC\I Shrub Pacific willow l--'c=cc_-+.c..c..c=~-""~-~-~---·~
'Sorbus aucuparia nc. F.-'ICL I Sh.tub rowan (mountain ash)
Sviraea douglasii L\C\\' Shrub hardhack ·~-1--~'c--.,.C--,~~-'cc----------~--Taraxacum of/icznalc lACl! ! Herb dandelion ---"-----+-----------------, Tnfo/ium pralcnse F.'\ ( T Herb red clover
Tri(oliwn reprns F \ (_. -1--H-e_r_b--+-[ -\V-·h"i-te_c_l_o_v_e_r ---
APPENDIX---! Page I
ROUTI\E 0:\-SITI IH TER.\H_\ATION METHOD
Projec;_. Site: ··core Properr_1 "
Stak: /Fashing/011, County K111g; City Rc1.:1,!!
Date Sepren1ber 21, 2006
l'i.,:11 Communi'\. Upland sour!, A-1
I 1c·lcl Im cstigators: Roger def Mora!
( ·1:cnl: Mr. Tern· Dutro
ID~ normal environmental conditions exist; -,~,-:;-XXX l\O
l_c\re vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology disturhecl'! Y IIS XX l\O hydrology, vegetation altered ---------.. . -----------~=~"---__cc"-'---'c'._ ____ _
[ ____ [)_()n1i_nant Plant Spe~ic~--
1. Sahr /undo
2. Ru/n,s c/1sco/or
\TGFTATION
----
ludicator Status
f ,cw
i \CL'
Stratum % Cover
-. ·-----·--·--------~----·
Shrub 60
Shrub 40
Others. Sorbus uucuparw (nc FACUJ; flex ,u1i:,,,,, inc, FACl:): Eq111selum 111-vense (FAC); Polrslichum
1111111iwm (FACUj
Percent of dominant species that are OBL f_\C\\ Jlic< -.,r FAC: 50%
Is the hydroph11ic ,·egctation criterion met 0 , '" \,, XX
Rationale: Afixed dominance o_l fac11!zo1i1 e ·11: 1:/ -\·Jccies. likely e-1.pansion of upland spectes.
SOILS
Series:phase as Mapped: lndianola loamy fi11c .<111c:
Do soils match mapped seriesiphase0 Yes_ \,, __ ,ifno, describej disturbed; some fill
ls the soil on the hydric soils list 0 Yes_ No l ·11,ktcnnincd XX
Is the so:1 a Histosol'° Yes ___ No XX Histic qiipction present? Yes_ No XX
ls the so,J rnottled 0 Yes No XX ; Gleyccl' Yes Ko XX.
Matrix Color: YR 3/2 \]()iikd Colors: none
Is the hydric soil criterion met°: Yes No :\X
Rational_e: Chroma 111arg111ol, lacks mollies
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes_ No :\X _ Sur(:1ce 11ater depth:
Is the soil saturated'' Yes ; No XX De1;-f-, 10 frc·c'ianding water in probe hole: uone found
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation: none
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met'' Yes __ '\,, :\X
l
Rationale: Lack of saturation or depressiona! l(,pu_<,;:rtl/!l1y -~~----------------------
JURISDICTIONAL DETER\ll;\IATIO:\ A:\D RATIONALE
ls the plant community a wetlancP Yes
Rationale for jurisdictional decision: Foils ALI. , r,r,r1c:. 1ho11gh vege/ulion is close to hydroph_rllc
A Pr~E:\DIX~l Page 2
ROCTJ.\'E O.\'-SfTE DETERMINATION l\lETHOD
Pruji.::ct ·s1tc. ··core Propert.r"
State: llitshinglon: County: f.:.l!lg, Cit\': Rent,n:
Date: Scp1enzhcr 2 1. 2006
l'L1111 Community: Werland A-1
F:c·ld fnvesligators: Roger de/ Mom!
Clicm: lv!r. Terrr Dulro
Do 11 ormal environmental co II di tiot-1 s~e~x--i_s_t :_\_·_E_s_· _x_·_x_x_' -N-
1
0--~=~--=-~-----------··1
i Are ,egetation, soils, and/or hXdro~ogy disturbed'.' YES XX NO hydrology, vegetation altered
\EGETATIO:\'
[ ___ Dominant_P_la_1_1t_Sc:..,_p_cc'-i-e_s _____ _ Indicator Status
·-------
1. Suhx !uc1du 1:_\CW
Others nrroprcns sp. (FACW or FAC)
Percent of dominant species that are OB!., FAC\\' :md:ur FAC
ls the hydrophy1ic vegetation criterion met? Yes I 00 '-:o
Rationale: Dominance offacultative \'\'er/and s_Pt.'cics
SOILS
Series/phase as Mapped: Indianola loamy fine sct:id
100%
Do soils match mapped series/phase'' Yes '.\o XX tifno, describe)
Is the soil on the hydric soils list'? Yes No l'ndctcrrnined XX
Stratum
Shrub
ls the soli a HistosoP Yes_ 'lo XX Hist1c cp1pulon present? Yes_ No XX
ls Ille soil monled? Yes No XX ; Glcycd' Yes No XX
Matrix Color: 10 YR 2/1 Mottled Colors: none
fs the hydric soil criterion met?: Yes XX No
Rationale: Chroma i11d1catg:s high level of orgo1,1c 11:ai!cr conststenf wirh a wel/cuul
UYDROLOGY
Is lhe ground surface inundated'J Yes_ '\Jo XX: Surface water depth:
01,, Cover
90
fs the soil saturated'J Yes ; No XX Depth to freesunding water in probe hole: none found
List other fidd evidence of surface inundation 01 soil sa'c,ration: bare soil
ls the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes XX l\u __ _
Rationale: Historical evidence: ,.velter rhun swTrJ1:"111!i11gs ___________________ _
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION A:\'D RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland'.' Yes XX '.\o
Rationale for jurisdictional decision: Meets crizen::. nun he_ drying out.
_Rol>~rt _J\11.._Pridc, Inc.
l\,fav 23, 200c;
Consulting
~~f!,l!:1ecr
Page: l o":, 1
Mr. Tern· Dutro
10-;-11 SE 30th Street
Bcllc,ue, WA 98004
DEC O c ""n~ .. , i.JJ[)Q
Re: Report on Geoteehnieal Investigation
Proposed Resicki:,ial Dcwiopnwnt
Jones Avenue :rnrl :,JE 20th Stcect
Renton. Washington
RMP Proie,l '\o lJ.~-194-01
Dear Mr. Dutro.
This report presents the resu lb of our gc·ukcl rn ica] investigation of the property located
on the north sicl,, of '\f. 20' ' Strrrt and jus: Pit.,: of Jones Avenue Road in Renton. It is
nnclerstoocl that 27 sin!',le farnih-resickiwc·s "ill be built on the parcel that is currently
occupied by existing, resicknt ial .structures.
The purpose of this rq,ort is to prC>\ idc a description of the site and subsurface
conditions, and to pn·"·nt g,·oteclrnical rrt·o1111:1endations for the design and
construction of the prop"sl'cl resideJ1ces. CSGS mapping for this area of King County
and pre,·ious experience· in the Renton area \\Tre used as references for this report. A
preliminary site plan f<> t· PL1l # 1 prm ided h\ \ our office was used as a reference for our
geotechnical stmk
Site Conditions
The near rectanp,ubr propert, is sit11at('d ,,·ithin developed residential properties to the
"·est, north and east of this site. Surface de•, ations are relatiwh· flat m·er the property,
,,hicb is cow red \\·ith grass, ,1nes ai:cl miscd13neons trees. There is a small creek on the
"est<?rlv side of the site that is feel 1)\ surface ,rnter runoff from the south and a 24 inch
diameter storm drain pijle leading frum the new subdiYision to the e;;st. Tbe creek leads
to a pond near the n01il11w•st conwr or th,· plat. An existing residence is located on the
easterh· side of the proper\\'.
Field exploration i1wlud1·d t!w exca, atir,11 "f <x test pits to depths ranging from 7 to 9
foct. All of these test pits encountered ,m up;Jcr organic silt/sand topsoil laYer that was
about one foot in depth. Below the Wp:,uil "ere Lacustrine and Outwash deposits
consisting of stiff cla, ,., silto and medium dense sands. Ground\\·ater "·as found in all of
the test pits at depths ranging from h to 8 fee·. below existing grade. Locations of these
test pits are shmrn on the attached Dra"ing '-io. 1, and the sum man· logs for these
explorations arc incluckcl in Appendix,\.
-
1:vo:~ Hc)hne.c:. l'<iint flri\·,, :--.-E Kirkland, \VA 98034
Phone .r.15-8q-'.")Q~r1 Fax: 425-814-5672
M:--i\' 2~, 200c;
Page'.'.
Based on the result, uf "',ll' sitC' inwsti?,at,un ancl on re,iew of your plan for the
proposed residential del"elopment, the existing native Lacustrinc or Outwash deposits
1,ill provide satisfacton support for tlw plan1wd single family structures. Depth to
bearing soils across the site ,,ill be about one foot below existing grade. but could be
deeper if building pad <'ic'Yations arc rnisccl. I mportcd granular fi1l soils should be used
to create ele\atecl lmilding pacl meas. ancl thr.sc soils should be compacted to at least
90 % of their maxim 11 rn clen.si I,. The , 1p1wr t ,ipsoil layer should be removed prior to
placing compacted fill. Storm water infiltrntion through the lacustrine silts on this site
will be inhibited b, these luw permeabilitl" soils.
Foundations
A majority of the foundations will consist of continuous bearing wall footings that will
extend onto tlw stiff ,ill, or nw,liurn dc,ns,· sill/sand layer or on properl) compacted
granular fill. Depths of these footings shou1d he a minimum of 18 inches below existing
grade for frost protection.
\n allo,qble soil \.warin1s Yalue of :euoo psf ma:,· be used in the design of these footings.
This ,-aluc may be inc1·,0 ascd .13% for short dumtions ofloading due to wind or seismic
forces. F.stinnted sc·tt1(•ment of tht>c0 e footi n~s will he in the range of l/4 to 112 inch under
the anticipated structurn i loads.
Resistance to lateral loading on the struct.1r,· can be prmidecl by passi,·e earth pressure
on the foundation" alls. An allmwbk passi, e pressure of 200 pcf may be used for
resisting thesr forces as ion,( as the fnoti1,gs ;'re backfilled \\1th compacted fill. The
potential for site liquefaction is considered ,·e•-v low.
Interior floor slabs sb0l1ld be ,mderlain b, "ompacted granular fill after the one foot
topsoil lawr has been remm ed. The topsoils can be used in landscape areas of the site,
and the onsitc Ou\l,ash deposits arc considcrc'd excellent for structural fill. Import pit-
run may be used for the intnim tlonr slab ttli. It is recommended thilt all building pad
fill he placed in thin lifts and compdc·terl to" nniformly high densitv to minimize
settlement of the i ntcric,r floor slah a n<l/ or foundations. All granular fill soils should be
compacted to at lcnst 90% as determine,] h, .\STM D1557test method.
Exterior slabs on grnde .slionld ,1lsn J,,, 11ncl,0 rl.:iin by compactecl granular fill after
removal of the top.soib. All concrete ,L,b, should be reinforced to minimize shrinkage
cracking, and ennt rc,1 _inints in these .,L,h, ,IJould be at 8 to 10 foot centers.
Kirkland, WA 980,14
'.\1a, 2.3, 2.005
Mr. Terr, Dutro
Page 3
Retaining walls mm· \w cksigi1cd for an actiw pressure of 30 pcf for level backfill.
Resistance to lateral '"ii pressures ma, be pr"' icled by a passiw earth pressure of 200
pcf \\·hen the footing is ,11pr,ortecl lw nnti,r .,nils or properly compacted backfill. Drain
grawl and a pcrforilte,i .,uhclrain ,,iil be r,,quirell at the base of perimeter residential
footings and the rc;ir , ,f rcuining "alls d lie to the presence of the im perYions Lacustrine
silt deposits.
Slle Drainage
Surface water nrnuff frnru h"use roof areas or th<' hardscape around the residence
should be colkctNl h, tighllines and area cl rains that lead to a street storm drain system.
Foundation sllhdrains ,,hollld be separnte from roof down drains, hut the, may be
connected ten feet"""' l"rnm the rooftightlines.
Construction monitori:1g and consnltaticrn sen ices should also be prm·ided to verify that
subsurface conditi(>l1S are ,imilar to those de.scribed in this report. Should conditions be
re,·ealed during con;,truction that vary from the anticipated Sllbsurface profile, we \\ill
e,·aluatc those conditions anci pro,·ide allcrnati, c recommendations "-here appropriate.
Our findings and n·commendations in this rcpott were prepared in accordance with
generally accepted principles of geotechnic,il engineering as practiced in the Puget
Sound area at the tinw ()ttr mH-k was performed. We make no warranty, either express
or implied.
Please call me if l hei-e .1 re am questil)n., 1-c'garding this repoti.
~
pectful!y, , . ~~,~-"'"/·~.~ ---n • ;, I\ l ..,~\ .' -'1~'., ~ ~ 1v~~/Y~.· .'_.J
Robe1i M. Pride, P E. ; · ,, · ;
Prindpal Geotechni,·,11 f'ngin{~,r ;; ~··
dist:
end:
(3) ad,i res"'"'
Dral,ing ~o 1
Aµpemi ix ,\
nnp: DutroRen:1,1n
J
Kirkland, WA 080:3.1
'°;;ge 3 ::if 11
\.
P01'J0 i ~. \ ""'
:/)
.U ,J ~,
L
/
NE 2oth
Ref: Site Plan for P ,t # 1
7
c
5
2
\
Plat #1
' \ .
I
I
I
!
I
i
9 10
23
24
25
&l TP. S ~6 20
____ L,. --
i
I
j
' '' i I.
'
' '' ' ' ... .{
ii
1 l
rp .. 1
@
12
13
14
lb
16
56,B i ~"536 f
4 __ _:.,_
i
17
Page 4 (S l l -----
SITE PLAN ---~~-~~-'-~--'-~~-=~--'-~~~~~~~~~~~~~--I
Pror.osed Resident , .I Development Project No. 05-194-01
,Jor,('S Avenue and 'E 201'' Street
Rent on, W ashingt< 11 Drawing No. 1
Robert M, Pride _ [nc: OJnsulting Erueiru,w
A.PPFNDIX A
Sumncan Logs of Test Pits
: ,_ ~ t_c,,,··,c:, 1
Surface Conditions
-'
l -
7 -
8 -
LOG OF TEST PIT NO. TP-1
dryi flat. moderateh ,\uod('-t1 with ahlers and lo\\
lnuS 1 ·
Flevation (Approx.):
i""t' 1.,1..' :~ p:.in ,,, ll,<: 1c:r,1n p~tpared b\ Y011cmll~u_licoll,t'1~:JI ~tr\'i.:es (Y(;S) for tlH.; nameJ
:-:r, '\c:c1 i111J :-;1-,()·.1i ,I :'.c r-_-;1,: ,,_1 c!ttl_ler \1·i1f1 !lHr, rl.'por·. Im_ c:nrn 11,ck I nlt'rr,rcrnt1on. i his ~urn nn1ry
app it:: vnll at; !S 1,,~.111,,:·, .,) tli1~ 1r~11..:l1 al the tm1c Ol e.,c.1, <1\1(111 Su,ismta..:e co11dmons nu1,
:.:l,:in:::~ ,t1 llK:.t1·ii: .,1:I: ·k p;,c.~age flft1rnc. 1 In: d:11~ pr..:gcn1c:d iH<c :1 s1rnpltfical10;1 orac:tu3l ·
;_c>ih\1ii1\n~ <.'l:,·1,1 II", ,:]I.',"
DESCRIPTION
· Topsoil
SA'\·D,. SJ I ·1·. ,b1 ~ h,·n\,:1. fine to medium. trace organics anJ scattered roots:
1oc,...,e. moist
SILTY ~A:\'D. :·.::,:,1 ish ht\)\Nll, tine to medium. trnce roots to 2.0 feet; loose-w
mcdiun'. dtT:-..;.'. m11<t
CLA. YE'I.-' ~ILi: ;;--:i_, hr 1wn mottled reddish brown. thinly laminated \Vith
c.and: ii];: ,<.,ri :"f :1 1 \ er> '-.lift'
_ \\Cl
SA\D:grc,;-hn)\\ 1-, ti::c to medium. thinly bedJ.ec! \\ ith coarse sand: medium
de1'se. \\·d
F·2ge 0 of 1:
-------,
' '
--3llnonl0t· ;,:< ,,, t :r 8.0 fret; completed and hiCkti lk:d on 5: 18/05. Ground\..-~ter
encriu:H~r,\l 1· 1.l,-,·\; 6.U feet
f.l.l'nt11r1 Wa-.hingion OS-10019
r, ,· . ...J ;1:;ineering CJc-olog)
Yonernitsu Geological Services (YG:::,,t_, Applied Ear11 1 Science,
3
4
_:; _
6
8 -
i -~ ,-
LOG OF TEST PIT NO. TP-2
llr_\ ,11.it, modrralt·I.\ wuoded "'ith filbert trees. Elcvmion (Approx.):
I hh li)~ ,~ p&1 .,_: t!K rc:r,:·:·; prcparcJ _h\ \'t.1ni.:mitsu Geolog.1c11I S_eniccc, \ 't'(JS) for the named
p11•1L-cl J1•.J )1<,-1.d ,,,. 1 :s1J IO.(! .. ~\h-:r 1>1tf1 tkll re1x1rt for rt,mpkto: int~·rpr'C't<1\1un. l his. summnri
"l1pl:..:: l>i'I, .i' ;!,c .·1 .)ftlns trcqch c1t the 11mc 0t (,,:;\\ i,!.1<,11 Subsurt.,i~i.: cond1t1_0ns ma)
'--·1:111,~'L' .1: i.l.;,··,,11 ·· 1--c t'.'a_;;.;;ap.c l•t lnn<c' Tht' da1;1 rr<c~-e>11rcd ~,re a ~1mpli!1s:;1tmn ot actual
C:(ll1,llllf,>l1, ,·1 , ll\11
DESCRlPTIO/\
Topsoi1
SA:\DY SlLl: c.,:·k. hrown, fine to medium. trace organics and scatk:red roots;
loose. Jn()ist ----~~--
Glacio~Lacl1:strinl:' Deposits
CLAYEY ~ILL ~;·:1:1 hro\11,·n monld reddish bff)\\n. thinly laminated with
'>\\'.ld> c;j\[ ~tir'.-111 \'L''·:, :;tiff
. \\ 1.'l
J rend: H-1]h c:1<:i·,Ln,~ vertical to 7.5 feet
'SA 'd)> 1 <' br,n\ :: . rine 10 medium. thin!:, be:\.i?d \.\ ith coarse sand: medium
Jen.c,c. \1:
---BDi\0111 .. ,I :e'.-l ~~It cl" -_-.) feet cornpleLed "alld hack.!-i]Jed on 5/18:'0). 0-roundv,·ater· ~
enco.1:1tcr c·d .,:.t lk·.:0.!· .5 feel ]
PROPOSE[) \l\, I I· Rlll'ILDER DE\'ELOPMEI'> T
Ht.·nton. \Vashington
1 ·or 1-lohl'rt M. Pride
05-10019
f ' __ ,,. -
Yonemitsu Geological S . y $; ')~ineeri.m:: G.eolol'.\ erv1ces ( G 1 ----aki Applied t.arth Sciences 2
Surface Condi1101,,,·
3
4
5
8 -
] __ _
LOG OF TEST PIT NO. TP-3
drY. flat, rnodcratc:h \\ntHkd ,·vith alders and lo"
hru:.,,h ·
Elevation (Approx.);
Th 1, k•[l 1, ;'J:1,,1 1.·,L kpu1l prepared b1 'r ,1ncrn1tst1 (JeologLa! ,S_2n 1c:e~ 1YGS)_ fo! 1h..:: named
p111\..:,·1 ::i1 d ~h·i1ild i--,,: r.:.,~ t(1Lf'et'\ier with th:E rcpon f01: ~·~\lll[lktc 1n1errrctii(tln1. flus surnmaTy "!'" 10::s 011,\ ,·,t ::1; 1,k.it·,,·:1 iJ this trench at tl1c t1111c 111 o.:xcnY:111on Subsurfas:<.: conditions ma,
c' ·,i.il~f<.: a: l(,._;i11u11 ',\·11h 1il-: pi'.h~ag<" 11ft1me Tht d:itn rrc~~ntcd arr a ~1111pl11lcatio1·, of acn1al ·
c·onL1111111:, <en(: 11111:·~vJ
DESCRIPTION ~s-orr-
SILTY~.-\ '\l): 1Llr~ h'own, fine to rnedium. trace orjwnics and scattered roots;
loose. rnc1>l
Glacial OutWJSh Dcro:iits
.'.'-i:\!\lU: :·~,\ r:-,-\\\ · iine to medium, thin),:,. bedded with coarse sand: medium
dcn:-c. \~ l'l
--Rnttnm (-:-1'-'~l .~i:, ::-.'f)Th of8.5 fe-et: com])leted ~nd bacUllled on 5/18/05.
Strnn,q "L',_'!1:·1~'-· \L')'tl-8.0 feet
l'ROl'O~U) ,1.\s 11.lllll ILDER DEVELOPME'.\T
1-frnton. \\ ashington
For Rohnt M. Pride
05-10019
3
f\,g:~ .s·. ct 1:
Surface Condition~:
3
4
6 -
8
·~te l:?icl /Cf: T,nc ---i-,:;1 ·'.,, r·r · Page'=' o1 il
LOG OF TEST PIT NO. TP-4
dn. flat. modcrateh "otHh:d \' ith alders and )O\\
bruSh ·
t:ba1it1n (Approx.):
I hi~ ],ip 1~ 0.1;1 ,.t L,1,. 111ep11r,:d .b\· Yonemitsii _{ ;rnl0i:10.:<1I Ser. i<.:e~ ( Y(i'.:>) ti.w th,;: n,imed
pro_1<'.;:-am!'~li111i",,i b, :1'!_'.dhe1· ,, 1tli th:.t report !or. (l1nl;1kt~ 1nt~rprelat1nn Thi)_ ~ummal)
''l'pliv.; on!) :1_'-tl,1 1,,,-J'tl ,11 n; :..l1s t1cnch at lhe t1m,:: oi ,;-_\.·~<n ,111011 Sllhsurfai..:-c: cuui.l1t1tm~ llld\
'-;.rngc· ,11 kwc.Lrni ,,::~ '· '')bsag,., l,furnc: The dnt., prc~n·1.-d <iro: a ~l:".lphfi;ation ofactm1\
,·ond111im;-; c.:11,·,,w k1,··
DLSCRIPTIO!-s
Topsoil·: FOreSi Duff
Organic Sil .T: : :.,tl h\mT1. fine, roots. very :::oft. ve0 moist
Giacio-Lacustrirle"-Dl;'posi1S--
C LA 'VEY Sll T c:'-1"-'·> bri..w,n mottled reddish bro\\ll. thinly laminated with
..;:,:rnh· ~ilt: siiff11' \ er: ::--tiff
. \\'d
Glacial Ouh~ash Dq:ioslis
SA:'ilD: gn1) brl.l\\n. :111~ to medium, thinly bedded\,\ ith coarse sand; medium
cense. \\ et
J foot bnul.:tT
·11·encl·, wall-:-,.,rn,111 \Crtical
B0t1om of tC~~t ;~i1 .t1 Ci?p'_fi .. "s.3" feet: co1nple1-ed and !:°iJckfilledori-5: 18/05. Seeping
<.;lff',ngly at (1 :·eel
PROl'OSLLJ MA'iTFIUll ILD[R DEVEI.OP'lffl\T
Renton.\\ ashington
hfr Robert M. Pride
.. ' :t
05-10019
J
. . . ·n~i·1eering C:ieolog~
Yonem1tsu Geological Services (YGS),1 ,\pplied Earth Sciences 4
Surface Condition.~.
3 -
6-'
8
q -
LOG OF TEST PIT NO. TP-5
mnist to \\ct, tfat. lo~, hru~li. an<l grasse~ Flevalion (Approx.):
1 hi·. lu,:,: 1, :1,1·1 , ,:
rr,·:1:d'ar.,! ,h,)l1,-.!
·'J'Pli("\ Pll :ll th.:
( 1:111;::,: ~t iu,:'.lidll
<.:(m(fition~ ,,,, ,,,.,,, ,1
pr-c:par~d b\ 'r 011c:m i:,u _(ic:0]0121 .. al Si.:rrn.:c~ fYGS) for thi.: mim~d
l.)g<:Ther 1>,11f1 th:,.t rcpo1i k1r conirktc: mL~·rptdatmn. Thb_ sum ma~
nf1h1S trtnch at The tune ut c:,.;cn\ 2.t1011. ;)uburlac:.: condmons m:n
·13.;;.;;:ige oftm1c The dntc1 pn:·sc't1kd i"'.rt ~ ~impltfiuttwn of ac:rnal ,
DtSCRIPTION
·Topsoil/ Forest DL-1ff
Organic Sl LT: .:·.::r ~ brown. fine. roots. \'ery .soft vt:'ry moist
Glacio-Lacusti-inc l),:rmits
CLA, EY ~11.T: ~'r:n i~rown mottled reddish bnrn 11. thinly laminated with
sa1~d, silc .~ti'.·: t,,·, \ :.>r'\ :,tiff
. \~ t'l
seep;ige a· ~j J~,,·1
Glacial Outv..-ash Depo~it::;
SI LT'\' ~ -\~ n:-·!-d\ hro\vn mottled reddish brown. fine. thinlJ bedded with
i,an.:\ s:.:1·-·11f\;i1:J1' dl·11 .. e. wet
trench \', c.l. ~ ,1:111,hi~ ,·2rtical to a depth of 8.0 feet
SA~D \\ 1TH ~ll..k:;;1\· brown. fine to medium: medium dense. wet
SA!\D: ~1:r~i;. i!c:' h' u~ase, trace silt_ sca.nered byers of coarse sand: medium
! dense to Lk1~·:;c_ \<'l
Botton~ u:·1..:c.,1 pi. ill '-kTth of9.0 feei: coinple1ed an[; backfilled on 5, 18i05.
Ground\U'~'r l'l'(·11111~·.Lrccl at depth of7 feet.
"age J(, c' 11
l'HOPOSED \I\' ITRllrlLD[R DEVELOPMENT
Renton. "·ashington 05-10019
F1ir R()ht'l"t \-1. Pride
.J 1':'ineering GcoiO!!\.
Yonemitsu Geological Services (YG==>:)1j \ppli,d Ea,1n s~icncc, 5
Surface Condition:-,.
I -
-1 -
'
6 -,
LOG OF TEST PIT NO. TP-6
areas of standing ,'takr, lbl. lo" brush, and grasses Elevation (Appro:\.):
Thi~ i<l!c i, ns\~: ,,'. ·l1c rcx11 prepam.! h Yt)11e1111t~u_C1Ltll0!.:i,·;il Seni:.:cs (Y(iS )_ for the named
pr01cc1':1nJ\k-uld h~ re.:,, tuf0ether \\ 11.1 thal 1ep011 Jor_ umipklt 1nterprc:1auon. fh1s surnmrn)
"l11-il1c~ 011h ,ii -h~ 1ti-sill1u1, ,, this treiicb ilt tlK t11ne {ll e.\:.::J\il\1011 Suhsurfacc: ::ond1tion~ mi't\
.: 111-igL· ~t I:,. ;111,,• 1•. 11r tl:c: )'assag.e ofu:nc 1he date. prescm;:J are a simplifi..:at10n or actual'
,·\,11<l1t11)11, ,·:,_-,,;J1:,:r, ,I
DESCRIPTION
--~T~opsoil' forest buff
Organic SILT jznk kon·n. ilne. roots, very sort. very moist
-~acial Outv,:ash· f){'posits
SIL TY S.-\\[)_ ~1·a:-h:·cwn mottled reddish brov\'n. thinly bedded. medium
d~~11se. wet
SA~U: gm:, l:1 ,\\ r. f:1w to medium, rrace si!t. scatteted layers of coarse sand,
rr1ed1um ck1b~'. nc·
Bottom -oftist pit :1! \L:pth of7.0 feet; completed and backfilled on 5/)8/05.
Grn11nlfo ,11,;r cTu,·.1nie<;;"d at depth of 6.0 feet.
~age : l c/ 11
-~
PROPOSED ~1\~TI mn ILDER DEVELOPMENT
Renton. \\'ashington 05-10019
For Rohcrt M. Pride
. . . . .. J nl!.i:1eerim: Geo log\
Yonem1tsu Geological Services (YG<:)l, C\pplied Earth s~iences 6
. -
Oct 26 06 09:4\;a r. 1
Department of Bic./c\Ji
University of Washington
Sei::,e 'Nasnington 93195"5325
Thursday, October 26, 2006
Return Fax: 206-685-1728
FAX TO:
425 454 8212
FROM:
Terry Dutro
Dr. Roger del Moral
2 pages follows ·--v,th 1equ11ec! rr1k:rn,a,ion
Box 355325
This took a bit CJ1',Je1 than I had •J,~n 11ed , -.viii credit you with 1 hr of time as an
amendment. but must b II you for ·1 2.dcJmrnal hour. That invoice will be sent to you by
separate cove
! hope that this is the information you wanted. The wetland is close to 2300 sf., but I
cannot measure it accurately. The points should be surveyed
Sincerely,
"(ager
~,_,:::;'-:: --~
Oct 26 06 08:42a p.2
•.,. & .0.:SS(>ClATe£
4·. t:,,·.n: [,:;T
· ···:;1'.,~ :',L:, i I)
Dear tvlr. Dulrt),
Herc is n1y map ,-11·tl1-...· 1.1.-..::1la11d sorn·, \!l·n·.LU"l> Property. Area is estimated 10 be 2700 s.f. The
,;1.rca sl10uld be dc·ttTr111k·U L~:ing rnc·. ~-·"1\, ntrhods than m·e avai1ah~e to rni::. The measured
coordinates of' the i.L1Lt pdirits ,u-L' :J-. ,,.,.,,1 .11 11~~-:·ollO\.ving table. The \vetl,rnd is sho\.vn below.
The cl itch ls nut CUlhic.J.:rcd pitti cifth:: ·.'-.::d,~:-:.:l >ecause it is artificial :.ind no longer appears to be
functiornll. SPD ut"ih·,:,::. tht' rq_1prnxit~~;:t2 :p1~-;:s ! :·r soil deten11inations c1.long the northern edge;
sp:,-.r notes the :1pprn.\ .nL~Lc spols fc,1 .-;01 l ,kLT ~mations along the southcn1 edge. detennined ln
u previous study.
Table 1. Coordir:ai::s r'ur the wetlo.nd po1i"r . .: .. 1J. 0 ft is the southwest corner, 100. 120 ft 1s lhe
northeast con1c:r or ti1e ;;ketch.. The S,'L.:l:we::·st con1er conespomls to a point near the northwest
comer of the Ngu~ en r'ropcny. \Vhi: ':..' Lhc :~unht'ast con:er corresponds lO 1hc southeast corner of
the Dutro ])'open:,. : t~~>rtio~ · -tJiJst to L:1~1 ___ ~~rth_1.0Southl
, B2 62 S !
BJ ..11 19
i Ditch s!an 40 .JO
i A3 .l-1 56
; ", 7 65 6(1
jAI 90
I Ail_ . ·-·--'·} u,, J
72
--_!l_!_
This completes m-.. L·. 1:111L1 .. :nts
SinirflY,
; ' ! f i , I ,1 rO(cv->'~~:
Rager Ml Moral
Owner. DMA
Oct 26 06 09:42.a
Dutro Property
-<--Sc:ale = 100 ft-->
i Estirnated wetland area
:!!! 2700 s. f.
North .Ll2.
.11.3
SPd_ A 1
SPd AO
Wetland
Drtch
Starts
83 SPn
SPn --
B2
Nguyen Property
p.3
DRAI:\'AGE REPORT
FOR THE
SHORT PLAT OF BLUEBERRY MEADOWS
City of Renton File No.
Eastside Consultants, Inc. File No. 06081
December 4, 2006
Prepared by:
Easrsicle Conrnltants, Inc .
./ 15 Rainier Blvd N
Issaquah. W.4 98027
(./]5) 392-5351
Prepared for:
[errv nutro
10°! I SF JO'h St.
Bellen1c. WA 98004
(./25) ./5./-6340
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I: PROJECT OVERVIEW
II: PRELIMINARY CONDIT!O!\S SUMMARY
III: OFF-SITE ANALYSIS
IV: RETENTION/DETENTION A!\ALYSIS & DESIGN
V: CONVEY A:"ICE SYSTEM A1'1;ALYSIS & DESIGN
VI: SPECIAL REPORTS & STLDIES
VII: ADOPTED BASIN & C0\1Mll!\ITY PLANS
VIII: OTHER PERMITS
IX: EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DESIGN
X: BOND QUANTITIES \VORK SHEET
RETENTION/DETENTION FACILITY SUMMARY
XI: MAINTENANCE & OPERATIO!\S MANUAL .
APPENDIX A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
T.l.R. Section I: Project Overvie"
Existing Conditions:
This project consists of di\ iding a 1.17-acre parcel into 4 single-family residential
lots located in Section 5, Township 23 'forth. and Range 5 East, lying 11011h of NE 20'h
Street. The site borders a single family residences to the west and several single family
residences to the east. The site is primarily cleared with a few apple trees spread
throughout. The site gently slopes (,arics from 1 % to 10%) southerly. There was an
existing single family residence and garage at one time.
Proposed Conditions:
The proposed development consists of 4 single-family residential lots. Runoff
will be collected from the four single family residences and conveyed to a combined
wet/detention vault located in the panhandle of Lot J under the driveway. The water will
be conveyed to the existing storm system in ~E 20'h Street.
T.l.R. Section II: Preliminan' Conditions Summan•
Core Requirement #1: Discharge .§t the '.'Jatural Location
The Lots currently drain towards the ditch located west of the property where the
conveyance system in NE 201h Street discharges too.
Core Requirement #2: Off-Site Anallsis
See T.I.R. Section III for the Downstream Analysis.
Core Requirement #3: Runoff Control
A drainage plan is included in the engineering plan submittal along with supporting
calculations in Section IV of this T.IR. This site meets the Level II Flow Control
standards as outlined in the 1998 S. W .DJvt since detention is required
Core Requirement #4: Conveyance Svstern
Runoff will be conveyed using 6" and I 2'" diameter pipes.
Core Requirement #5: Erosion/Sedimentation Control Plan
A Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control (TESC) Plan will be included in the
engineering plan submittal. Temporary sediment pond calculations are included in
Section VIII of this T.l.R.
Core Requirement #6: Maintenance & Operation
The owner/developer will comply as required.
Core Requirement #7: Bonds & Iiahilit,
The owner/developer will comply as required.
Core Requirement #8: Water Quality
A drainage plan is included in the engineering plan submittal along with supporting
calculations in Section IV of this I .I.R. This site meets the Basic Water Quality
treatment.
Special Requirement #I: Critical Drainage Areas
This site is not within a critical drainage area.
•
Special Requirement #2: Colfil)liancc "ith an existing master drainage plan
This site is not within a master drainage plan
SpcciaJ Requirement #3_: Conditions rcuirirn! a master drainage plan
This site is does not require one
_Special Requirement #4: Adopted Basin or Community Plan
This project does not lie within an adopted community or basin plan.
Special Requirement #5: Special Water Quality Controls
A wet vault will be provided.
Special Requirement #6: Coalescin~ Plate Oil/Water Separators
This project does not require one
Special Requirement #7: Closed Depression
This project does not have a closed depression.
Special Requirement #8: Use of l ,akes. Wetlands or Closed depressions for Peak Rate
Runoff Control
This will not be used.
Special Requirement #9: Delineation of I 00-Year Floodplain
NIA.
Special Requirement #10: Flood Protection Facilities for Type 1 and 2 Streams
N/A.
~ecial Requirement #1 J: Geotechnical Analysis and Report
A Geoteclmical and Soils Report has been done and is included with this submittal
Special Requirement #12: Soils Anahsis and Report
A Geotechnical and Soils Report has hccn done and is included with this submittal
T.l.R. Section Ill: Off-Site Analysis
LEVEL 1 DRAINAGE ANALYSIS
FOR THE
SHORT PLAT OF BLUEBERRY MEADOWS
City of Renton File No.
Eastside Consultants. Inc. File No. 06081
December 4, 2006
Prepared by:
Eastside Consultants, Inc.
415 Rainier Blvd. N.
!ssw111ah. WA 98027
i./25) 392-5351
Prepared for:
Tan-Dutro
/0711 \E 30'h St.
Bellei-uc. WA 98004
!/25) ./54-6340
A reviev,' of the 1990 Sensitiw Area Map Folio revealed that no wetlands exist on
the site, although one has been located near the west side of the site, The Streams and
100-Y car Floodplains map show no named streams on-site. No Seismic, Erosion,
Landslide or Coal Mine Hazard areas are shown to exist on the site,
A review of'the SWDM Drainage Investigation Reports showed no drainage
complaints for the area.
Upstream basin
The upstream basin consists of a small portion of land north to the north of the
site and some east of the site in a residential neighborhood ..
Downstream Basin
Runoff will enter an existing 24-in steel pipe in.the north side of'KE 20'h Street.
The water will flow west in this pipe passing through two catch basins before entering a
drainage ditch approximately 226 feet west of the entrance, From here the storm water
flows northerly in this 2 feet wide ditch approximately 690 feet before turning
northwesterly. The stom1water eventually enters and 18-inch culvert under a private
driveway before discharging to a man made concrete edged pond. The pond overflows to
the ditch along Jones Ave 'KE The flrm continues northly along the east side of Jones
Avenue Ne to a private road. Here the tlo\\ is joined by runoff from a 18-inch storm
drain from the east from a water quality area. From here it turns west and flows under
Jones Avenue NE in a 24-inch concrete pipe. This is further then a quarter mile and end
of this description.
' I
I
i
-------,-· ------,, '
MILES
KILOMETERS 1
~-.===-~-~
.5
Coleman
0
•
I
!l
.... ,·') --_., ... .,.,,,.; ~'.._,.j_ __ L,c
~-..-~,--,,,~n-'~~~-------1 ~ !
'."'
' ' : . ,,
···1--' --~ ,,
,. H
J--'-':rc--l
. i
-. 8'
is:
;I
c::
I~
:'.:-
''::' ,/,' ,:,,·c 'I
· 1{]
~"-'"~·~· -i,:
OFF-SITE ANALYSTS DRAINAGE SYSTEM TABLE
SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL, CORE REQUIREMENT #2
Basin: East Lake Wash:::in::,ga_:tcco::n _____ _ Subbasin Name: Cedar River-Lake Washington Subbasin Number:_8:__ ___ _
Symbol I Drainage Component
Type, Name, and Size
see map I Type: sheet flow, swale,
stream, channel, pipe, pond;
Size: diameter, surface area
Drainage
Component
Description
drainage basin, vegetation,
cover, depth, type of sensitive
area, volume
Slope
%
Distance
from site
discharge
X ml= 1,320 ft.
Existing
Problems
Potential
Problems
constrictions, under capacity, ponding,
overtopping, flooding, habitat or organlsm
destruction, scouring, bank sloughing, II I I I I _ s_e~imentation, incision, other erosion
A I Site Discharge O None observed ! None
I
: A-B I 24" Steel I Along NE 20'" Str;;-et I 0-92' [ None observed I None
1ru~c:-i 24" Steel i Alo;~g NE 2ott, SlJ·-ect 92"-150" _, "\Jone observed I None
i~+l 24" Steel 'Along~-fr-: 20"' Street I I 150'-22(i' None observed 11\onc
! --------------' -·-·-------
I D-E t± wide drainage Along pro
----------
Jcrty line
I ditch with some rock and then a, :ross
E-F
F-G
G-II
pr-
I
f----'
i
i
G8-4\inl304
walls
18" culvert
Wide pond then turns
to 2-3'ditch
18-inch CAP
End of downstream
i prope11i es
Under driv veway.
Along Jon es Avenue
Under Jon ~s Avenue.
----
--·
226'-1206' None observed None
I
! 1206'-1231' None observed , None
I .
1231'-]381' None observed None
1381 '-1441' None observed None
··-· -I 1441
' -
I
..
---·
'
'
I
I
Observations of field
inspector, resource
reviewer, or resident
tributary area, likelihood of proble
overflow pathways, potential impa
Looked in good condition
Looked in good condition
r .ool-ced in good condition :i
!1 ·--~----~ -----,,
ii I ,c10ked in good conclit1011
i
Looked in good condition
i
Looked in good condition 1:
Looked in good condition !
Looked in good condition
--
'I
II
T.I.R. Section IV: Retention/Detention Svstem Analvsis & Design
A drainage plan is included in the engineering plan submittal along with
supporting calculations in this section of the report. The detention and water quality
facilities are designed in accordance with the Level-2 Flow Control and Basic Water
Quality requirements. .
Q ,,ipt1£':::I: ... '.1.;.< ' f;;;;;;fr ;.::;:1J
Free Print! evaluaticn \terslcn -http://wwwrobsoftware.com -
Area---~
Till Forest o.-i acres
· Till Pasture t-.i acr.es ...... ,.
Till Grass 0.00 acres
· Outwash Forest 0.00 acres
Outwash Pasture 0.00 acres
Outwash Grass 1 0.00 acres
I
Scale Factor:
Wetlandl 0.00 acres
lmperviousl_0:17 acres.
i.bo
I Total
I ~ .1 Tacresl
Hourly Reduced
Time Series: L!e_x_i_st_.t_s_~-------------~I
Compute Time Series I
Modify User Input I
File for computed Time Series [.TSF]
F
Flow Frequency Analys~~
Time Series File:exist.tsf
Project Loca:ion:Sea-Tac
---P•.r.n ·-1a l Peak Flow Rates---
ow Rale Ra!lk Tjme of ?eak
(CFS I
0.100 4 2/C9/Cl 15:0C
0. D62 6 l/C5/:J2 16: '.JC
C. l 10 2 2 /27 /03 7: o:::;
C.047 8 8/26/04 2:00
0.062 7 1/05/05 8:00
0.104 3 1/18/06 '.6:00
J.C99 5 11/24/06 3:00
0.10: 1 1/09/02 6:00
Computed Peaks
-Flow Frequency Analysis-------
--feaks Rank ?.e-::::11-rn P2'.'Cb
(CFS) Pericd
C. 2Jl 1 100.00 0.99C
v. J 10 7 25.00 O. 96C
J .. 04 3 10.CO J.900
J. ::_ 00 4 :J • 0 0 0.800
J.099 ' 3 . .JC 0.667 V
J.C62 6 2.0C 0.500
,J. 0 62 7 1. 3,1 0. 23::_
J. 047 8 1. :o 0.09i
,; . 171 50.00 C.980
DETENTION SYSTEM AND \\ATER QUALITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
1. Overview
The existing and developed flows are analyzed for the road right-of-way area and Tract
'D'.
Total Area Being Analyzed= 1.17 acres
Soils: Alderwood Series
AgC, Group A
TILL SOILS
LANDSBURG 0.85
Design Standards:
I. 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual
Level 2 Flow Control -· Basic Water Quality
2. Used KCRTS/runofffiks implementing HSPF
2. Existing Site Hydrology
Site Area= 1.17 acres
Total Area = 1.17 acres
Impervious Area:
A= 7405 sf (exist gra,el dri,eway, house, pad)
Total Area= 7405 sf or 0.17 acres
Pervious Area:
A = 1.0 acres (Pasture)
Using K.C.R.T.S. (See l'rintom)
Q-100=0.201 cfs
Q-10 = 0.104 cLs
Q-2 = 0.062 els
' . '
3. Developed Site Hydrology
Total Area = 1.1 7 acres
Developed Site Basin
Impervious Area:
A= 14,928 sf(lnterior Road)
A= 16,000 sf (houses}
A = 30,928 sf or 0. 71 acres
Pervious Area:
4. Detention
A= 0.46 acres (lawn)
Using K.C.R.T.S. (See Printout)
Q-100 = 0.433 cfs
Q-10 = 0.257 cfs
Q-2 = 0.213 cfs
Detention Vault Design Volume:
Using K.C.R.T.S. (see printout)
Required Volume= 1,013 cf
Length = 16 ft
Width= 16 ft
Effective Depth = 4 ft
Detention Vault Volume Provided -1200 cf> 1013cf o.k.
r..--------------llllillllilllllllllllll!limi1&:t'7ruB,Lci1';;L':;';:'.·.;'·'. 1,.;..,, ~-.1
Free Print! evaluaticn \.rers:.on. -http.//www.robsoftware.com -
-Area~~~
Till Forest 0.00 acres
0.00 acres
0.46 acres
0.00 acres
· Till Pasture
Till Grass
Outwash Forest
Outwash• P1jsture
· Qutwash Grass
· Wetland
lml)ervious
..
0.00 acres.
0.00 acres .
0.00 acres ·
0.71 acres
L_ __ 2-:_L__J,
[ To~~~ 7 atresl
Scal.e F~c;tot : .•. LOO Hourly Reduced
Time Se.ries: Lld_e_v_.t_s__:~ ____________ --.JI
Compute Time Series I
Modify Userlnµut j
File for computed Time Series[.TSF]
< '
Flow Frequency Analy~is
Time Series file:dev.tsf
Project Location:Sea-Tac
---Annual Peak Flow Rates---
E"low Rate Rank Time of Peak
(CFS)
0. 213 6 2/09/01 2:00
0 .172 8 1/05/02 16:00
0.257 3 2/27/03 7:00
0.185 7 8/26/04 2:00
0.224 5 10/28/04 16:00
0.226 4 1/18/06 J 6: 00
0. 270 2 10/26/06 0:00
0. 433 1 1/09/08 6:00
Compi.:ted Peaks
-Flow Freq:.Jency Analysis-------
--Peaks Rank Return Prob
(CFS) Period
C,. 4 33 1 100.00 0.990
0. 270 2 25.00 0. 960
0.257 3 10.00 0.900
0.226 4 5.00 0.800
0.224 5 3.00 0. 667
,:1 • 2 ~._3 6 2.00 0.500
J.185 7 1.30 0.231
0. 172 8 1. 10 0.091
0.378 SC.OD 0.980
t ... ....
ReteQtion/Dctention E'acility
Type of Facili~y: Detc~-,~ -:. r~-·
Faci:ity Length:
facility i,:idL'1:
l ~ . ~j l
·.oolc
"t
ft
Facility Area:
Effeccive Storage Depth:
S-::::age O Elevation:
Storage Vclume:
Riser Head:
Riser Diameter:
Number of orifices:
Ori.::ice # Height
( f:: )
0.00
3.00
Di ar:1'::' :...'::::·
(i_:·1
1
2
Top Noter. Weir: None
Outflow Rating Curve: None
Stage E_Levalion Sc -·
(ft) (ft) (cu. ft-_:-
0.00 C.00
0. 01 0.01 _)'
0.02 0.02
C.03 0.03
0.04 0.04 J ('
0.05 0.05 J 3 .
0.06 C.06 1 -__ J.
0.07 0.07
0.08 0.08 2 C).
C. ·, 8 O.c8 4 C.
0.28 0.28
0.38 0.38 SE.
0. 4 8 0.48 122.
0.58 C.58 l_ ~:
0.68 0.68 ] "1 --
0. 7 8 0.78 :-:.. s:.
C.88 0.88 22::
0. 98 0.92 24°.
1. 08 j__08 27''
1. 18 1.18 29 ! .
1. 28 1. 28 32;
"-32 1. 38 3(''
1. 48 l. 4 8 37'
1. 58 1. 58 4c:
l . 68 l. 68 4 2-' .
1. 78 j_. 78 4 51
1. 88 1. 88 4 7 ,:
~. 95 1. 98 50l.
? .08 2.08 sr
2. J. 8 2. lf: ~ i;: -
.._}.._)-.
2 .28 2.28 '::,'!
2 .38 2.32 60".
C. ~l ~
sq. ft
:t
_t
cu. f:...
'.' t.
:_::1cr_es
'u'l Head Pipe
r-'scharge
CFS)
o.co
0.393
Diameter
(in)
6.C
Discharge Percolation
c;c-:.:"-::::) (cfs I (cfs)
C, .000 0.000 c.oc
D. 000 0.002 0.00
C.000 0.003 0.00
V .000 0.003 0.00
a.coo O.OC4 0. co
'.l. 000 'J. 00 5 0.00
c.oco 0.005 C.00
C:. O'.JO C.005 C.JC
·;. DOC D.006 0.00
.001 0.008 0.00
.002 0.Cci 0.CD
C .CO2 o.c:2 o.co
.C03 0.CJ.4 0.00
' .OC3 J. ·J15 0.00
·= . J 8 £, C.016 c.oc
:: . 005 0.018 0.00
.005 0.019 0.00
.006 0.020 0.00
~.006 0.02: 0.CO
.J07 0. 022 0.00
.JC7 :
1 .'J23 0.00
. JCJ8 0.023 0.0C
-. )09 0. 024 0.00
.009 0.025 J. 0 '.J
'•J] 0 0.026 0.00
J.c:o 0. 02"1 0.00
011 0. 027 0. co
0.]12 0.028 0.00
. '.Jl? :, . 029 0.00
=·. ·113 ,j. 03'.) C.OC
' J13 0.03J 8. 0 '.J
. "J 14 0.031 '.). 0 '.)
•
2., 8 2.48 628. . c, '! 4 0.03" 0.00 ..
2.58 2.52 653. .~ , 1~1} l) 0.032 0.00
2. 68 2.68 678. 0.033 0.00
2.73 ?.IE 704. .. ·~. ': 0.033 O.OD
2.88 2.88 729. 0.034 0. C, 0
2. 98 2.98 754. 0.03S 0.00
3. OD 3.00 7 60. 0.035 0. 0 0
3.04 3.04 e-nJ. O. 03 9 0. 0 0
3.08 3.08 720. a3 O.CSO 0.00
' • 0 -, lL 3.12 7 90. 3 0.068 0.00
3.16 3. 16 8 00. ( ( 18 0.093 0.00
3.20 3.20 81J. :·, 1 q 0. l ? 4 0.00
3.24 3.24 820. 0 0. 15 9 0.00
3.28 3.28 830. ·,,. JJ. 9 0.20 0.00
3.32 3.32 8 41. . -9 0.258 0.00
3. 4 2 3. 42 8 66. . ·-' ,/ j 0. 2 91 0.00
3.S2 3.52 891. . ,J ~-, J 0.320 CJ.0-J
3.62 3.62 91 E. ~·' ~.;:: 1 0.347 0.00
3.72 3.72 942. ·: .. C; 2 0.371 0.00
3.82 3.82 967. C.C22 0. 3 94 0.00
3. 92 3. 92 9 92. C. ,~ / 3 0.416 0.00
4.00 t.00 1013. .. C ~~ 3 0. 4 33 0.00
4_:_o L.10 l C38. . 0) .:j 0. 7 61 0.00
4.20 4.20 1C63. -: . 0) ~ 1.340 0.00
4.30 4.30 108 9. . c: s 2.090 0.00
4.40 C 40 lL_4. '" . Oc 6 2.900 0.00
4.50 ,:; . :) 0 1139. . ,:·:2 6 3.200 0.00
4.60 C 60 1165. 7 3.00 0.00
4 . 7 ,J C 70 1190. . C,. 3.720 J. 00
4. 8 0 4. 8 D 12:_c. ,3 3.950 0.00
4. 90 ,; . 90 1240. . C·2. 3 4.170 0.00
5.00 5.00 12 66. :=,. C,2. 9 4.380 0.00
s. :_o 5.10 1291. r:;. C: JJ 4.580 0.00
5.20 5.20 13:_ 6. ,~-. j J 4. 770 0.00
5.30 5.30 1342. :·:. Ci 31 4.950 0.00
5.40 5. 4 0 1367. (: . ('.: :=: 1 .\.130 0.00
5.50 5.50 1392. c, 32 5.300 0.00
5.60 5.60 1C8. " . ':; 3 S.460 0.00
5.70 5.70 14 4 3. ,, c'3 o. 62 0 0.00
5.80 5.80 1462. • C :: 4 S.780 0.00
s.go 5.90 14 94. C : : 4 5.930 0.00 C'
6.CO 6.80 1519. C •": ·_; 5 6.080 0. 00 ...
~yd In:=10 1,, Outflch· Le.·C Storage
Ta::::-get Cale Stc.c~ f .. ( C·....1.-Ft ;1 (Ac-F-:::)
c.o 0 .13 0. 4 2 3.9' 995. O.C23
2 C.27 ******* 0.20 3. 2 E C 825. 0.Cl9
'j C.26 -J., !c """' + "'-~ 0.24 3. 22' ; • 4-830. 0. OJ 9
' C.23 *·k****""' 0.22 3.T 827. 0.019
0 C.22 ***""*** 0.22 3. 2. 828. 0.019
6 8. 2 J ***"'+*" 0.20 3. 2 E .:· 0 825. D.ClS
7 c.:9 ***""**""' 0.13 3.L C . 2 ~ 812. 0.019
8 C.::. 7 ***""**"' 0.15 3.n ~. L • 817. 0.019
.... 1'" ....
4a. Water Quality
Basic Water Quality
Basic Wetpond
Wetpool Volume C_ale,ulations: (Dead Storage)
V,
V,
A,
Atg
A,f
R
f
= (0.9A;+0.25A,g+O.IOA,r+0.011\.) x (R/12)
= volume of runoff from mean annual storm ( cf)
= area of impervious surface (sJ)
= area of till soil covered with grass (sf)
= area of till soil covered with forest (sl)
= rainfall from mean annual storm (inches)
= wetpool volume factor
V, = [(0.9x30,928)+(0.25x10.038)+(0.0)J x (0.470/12)
V, = 1,281 cf
V, =/xVr
Vb = wetpool volume (cf)
30,928 SF
20,038 Sf
0 SF
0.490 IN.
3
= 3 x 1,281 cf= 3 84,o cf Volume ofWetpool in Wetpond
IJ. TICOR TITLE COMPANY
600 SW 39th Street, Ste 100, Renton, WA 98055
(425)255-7575 FAX (425)255-0285
Toll free Number: l-800-215-8404
COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE NO. 6367338-
FOURTH REPORT
INQUIRIES SHOULD BE MADE TO: Customer Reference:
TBD Dutro/
Bette Bendele BendeleB@ticortitle.com
Linda Burbach. Title Officer (425) 255-7943
Marie Pierce, Title Officer {425) 255-7943
Donna Roetter, Title Officer (425) 255-7472
Effective Date: September 22, 2006 at 06:00 AM
SCHEDULE A
1. Policy or policies to be issued:
1992 AL TA Owner's Policy
Coverage: Standard
Liability: $ 0.00
Premium: $ 0.00 TO FOLLOW
Tax: $ 0.00
Proposed Insured:
TO FOLLOW
If the enhanced ALTA Homeowner's Coverage Policy is preferred, please contact the title unit. The
additional premium for an Enhanced Homeowner's Coverage Policy is to be determined.
1992 ALTA Loan Policy
Coverage: Extended
Liability: $ 0.00
Premium: $ 0.00 TO FOLLOW
Tax: $ 0.00
Proposed Insured:
TO FOLLOW
2 The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this commitment and covered herein is a Fee
Simple.
3 TICOR TITLE COMPANY agrees to issue on request and on recording of appropriate documents, its policy
or policies as applied for, with coverage as indicated, based on the preliminary commitment; title to the
property described herein is vested. on the date shown above, in:
Terry Dutro and Siri C. Dutro, husband and wife
subject only to the exceptions shown herein and to the terms, conditions, and exceptions contained in the
policy form.
4. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows:
SEE SCHEDULE A CONTINUED
Commitment Schedule A
Commitment No. 6367338-
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
SCHEDULE A CONTINUED
The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows:
Lot(s) 284, C. D. Hill man's Lake Washington Garden of Eden Division No. 4, according to the plat
thereof recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page(s) 82, in King County, Washington;
EXCEPT the west 126 feet thereof lying north of the south 234 feet thereof; AND
EXCEPT the south 234 feet thereof lying west of the east 26 feet thereof.
Commitment No. 6367338-
SCHEDULE B
Schedule B of the pd icy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the fcilowing matters unless the same
are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company:
GENERAL EXCEPTIONS:
A. Rights or claims disclosed only by possession, or claimed possession, of the premises.
B. Encroachments and questions of location. boundary and area disclosed only by inspection of the premises
or by survey.
C. Easements, prescriptive rights, rights-of-way, streets, roads, alleys or highways not disclosed by the public
records.
D. Any lien, or right to a lien, for contributions to employee benefit funds, or for state workers' compensation,
or for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, all as imposed by law, and not shown
by the public records.
E. Taxes or special assessments which are not yet payable or which are not shown as existing liens by the
public records.
F. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance, tap, capacity or construction charges for sewer, water,
electricity, natural gas or other utilities, or garbage collection and disposal.
G. Reservations and exceptions in United States Patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof.
H. Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including easements or equitable
servitudes.
I. Water rights, claims or title to water.
J. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public
records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured
acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this commitment.
SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS:
1. EASEMENT, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
PURPOSE:
DISCLOSED BY:
AREA AFFECTED:
of the south 234 feet
Ingress and egress
8805099006
East 26 feet of the south 234 feel and the south 15 feel of that portion lying north
2 NOTICE OF SEWER AND/OR WATER CONNECTION CHARGE:
GIVEN BY:
RECORDED:
RECORDING NUMBER:
City of Renton
September 2, 1992
9209021077
3 Payment of Real Estate Excise Tax, if required. The property described herein is situated within the
boundaries of local taxing authority of the City of Renton.
Present Rate of Real Estate Excise Tax as of the date herein is 1.78% plus $5.00 additional county
surcharge.
4. General property taxes and special district charges, as follows, together with interest, penalty and
statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency·
(1st half delinquent on May 1st; 2nd half delinquent on November 1st)
Total Taxes for Year 2006
Amount Billed: $1,301.66
Amount Paid: $650.83
Commitment Schedule B
Amount Due: $650.83
Commitment No. 6367338-
SCHEDULE B
(Continued)
Tax Account Number: 334390-3201-02
Levy Code: 2100
Current Assessed Value: Land: $108,000.00 Improvements: $132,000.00
5. Trtle is 10 vest in persons not yet revealed and when so vested will be subject to matters disclosed by a
search of the records against their names.
6. Until the amount of the policy to be issued is prov rd ed to us, and entered on the commitment as the
amount of the policy to be issued, it is agreed by every person relying on this commitment that we will not
be required to approve any policy amount over $100,000 and our total liability under this commitment shall
not exceed that amount.
7. Matters relating to AL TA Extended Policy coverage and/or Homeowners Endorsement coverage: The
results of our inspection will be furnished by supplemental report.
END OF SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS
NOTES:
A. The language contained in the printed Exceptions from coverage and Conditions and Stipulations of the
Policy committed for may be examined by inquiry at the office which issued the Commitment, and a
specimen copy of the insurance Policy Form(s) referred to in this Commitment will be furnished promptly
upon request.
8. Investigation should be made to determine if there are any service, installation, maintenance, or
connection charges for sewer, water, electricity or Metro Sewer Treatment Capacity Charge.
C. In the event the transaction fails to close and this commitment is cancelled, a fee will be charged to
comply with the State Insurance Code and the filed schedule of this Company.
D. Abbreviated Legal for purposes of King County Recorders Office is: Ptn Lt 284, C. D. Hillman's Lake WA
Gdn of Eden Div #4, Vol 11/82.
E. The records of King County and/or our inspectioc incicate that the address of the improvement located on
said land is:
1828 Northeast 20th Street
Renton, WA 98056
A s·,ngle Family Residence
According to the King County Tax Rolls the dwelling was built in 1918.
F. The Loan Policy to be issued will contain a Form 8.1 (Environmental Protection Lien) Endorsement.
jh/ga/03/0 7 /2006/03/10/2006 RE/06/02/2006 mt/ pc/09/28/2006
END OF SCHEDULE B
Commitment Schedule B
Commitment No. 6367338-
COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE
TICOR TITLE COMPANY, a California corporation. by TICOR TITLE COMPANY, a Washington corporation, its
authorized agent, herein called the Company, for a valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue the policy
or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A. in favor of the proposed insured named in Schedule A,
as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the I and described or referred to in Schedule
A, upon payment of the premiums and charges therefor; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and Band
to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof.
This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed insured and the amount of the policy
or policies committed have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the time of the
issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement.
This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and
obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate one hundred eighty (180) days after the effective date hereof or
when the policy or policies committed for shall issue. whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue
such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company.
TICOR TITLE COMPANY
By ¢it£~
Authorized Signai;;ry
254
3530'5 SF
381)2
N BB-09-49 E 381. i 7 (~P)
I:
,1
' II
' 1: I
11
I
1.67 AC
3152
I) 880~09900&
i\ '
N 89-9
24025 SF
~
15
LOT4
I
',
I
o• "' I
155 P(R. i
I
0
LOT 2 I!
Ii
' Ii
I
?1 l
I\
~ 1i I I
t:; ' 01: C,,IA ,I
9 8 fs I:
ID QI, LL I
..
L.!!7 AC
64,095 SF
~
' 0 "
2 27 AC
98, 936 SF
3203
Li!:i AC
501i0 SF
320! re,.__Tn~r-~ 00, ru CB
N M-iS-1-'1 E o,
Fat 0
J56J ;: ----------···-.
N 25
0 por. lot 2.
16884 S
3200
126
0 g
,.__ _ _,.o,_ ----------
N B9-20-12 t [SP)
6
-" LOT ~cl' fu "'J"°J-t,?,, .. z ,,,
w REN SP 130-78 ,n ..
' 17388 "' "' 3621 ,
0
0 126. 4
z
N 89-38-51 E 56.26
"'
:::
LDT~0
.,i,o? ,,,
20465 5
J52a
20508
3525
1. 82 AC
V'2!I
1,36 AC
59300#
Z721
.. J
-----
' 0
0110 0
7 z
0
N 69-22:P E 257,
N.E.18TH PL
AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION OF
PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN
City of Renton Development Services Division
1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055
Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231
r_'\ .J\Ni"~!~JG
i,f11Jl'l
DEC O 5 2006
STATE OF WASHINGTON \J,,;;lj
,j : ... µ
)
COUNTY OF KING )
duly sworn on oath, deposes and says:
1. On the S'" day of .Jr:., • ee I..,,. , 2011> I. , I installed
information sign(s) and plastic flyer box on the property
1f::a.& ,ve, ~o'tl\ S '1"'rce 1 for the following project:
~\"c.kur'-'. n, •• J .... ~
Own r Name
Project name
Tl!r"t i>..:t,.
being first
I public
located at
2. I have attached a copy of the neighborhood detail map marked with an "X" to
indicate the location of the installed sign.
3. This/these public information sign(s) was/were constructed and installed in
locations in conformance with the requirements of Chapter 7 Title 4 of Renton Municipal
Code.
Installer Signature
#4' , J, -,.h . '/ -
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this!!..__ day of ,f£Cc/£ /7//f/,R, 20 ~ ~ .
t1~,dt,tc_L~
IC ,ii) f.JDd_ for the State of Washington,
residing at ~==-',t'-t'?_t.::..::.;;ti~=-----··
I" ,-<''/! My commission expires on ---,"c~-"'~---
C:\Documents and Settings\Ron\Local Settings\'l·emporary Internet Ftlcs\Content.lES\U PFW 1303\pubsign[ I]. doc 12/05/06
CITY OF RENTON
1055 S. Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
-_______________________ DE_v_r_._LQPIAEr>rr PLANN/'•JG
-..-.,rr,;~., 1
Printed: 12-05-2006
Payment Made:
Land Use Actions
RECEIPT
Permit#: LUA06-156
DI:? u ,, · ,,, -t.. .J LUUO
RECEIVED
Receipt Number: R0605994
Total Payment:
12/05/2006 04:33 PM
1,000.00 Payee: TERRY D DUTTRO
Current Payment Made to the Following !terns:
Trans Account Code Description Amount
5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat 1,000.00
Payments made for this receipt
Trans Method Description Amount
Payment Check #11341 1,000.00
Account Balances
Trans Account Code Description Balance Due
3021 303.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee
5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees
5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers
5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat
5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees
5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review
5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat
5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat
5013 000.345.81.00.0010 PUD
5014 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees
5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment
5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks
5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone
5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt
5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev
5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval
5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Temp Use or Fence Review
5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees
5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee
5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend
5909 000.341.60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies
5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable)
5954 604.237.00.00.0000 Special Deposits
5955 000.05.519.90.42.l Postage
5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax
Remaining Balance Due: $0.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
Printed: 12-05-2006
CITY OF RENTON
1055 S. Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
Land Use Actions
RECEIPT DECO 5 2006
RECEJVED
Permit#: LUAOG-156
Payment Made: 12/05/2006 04:39 PM Receipt Number:
Total Payment: 500.00 Payee: TERRY D DUTTRO
Current Payment Made to the Following Items:
Trans Account Code Description Amount
5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 500.00
Payments made for this receipt
Trans Method Description Amount
Payment Check #11341 500. DO
Account Balances
Trans Account Code Description Balance Due
3021 303.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee
5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees
5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers
5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat
5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees
5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review
5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat
5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat
5013 000.345.81.00.0010 PUD
5014 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees
5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment
5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks
5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone
5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt
5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev
5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval
5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Temp Use or Fence Review
5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees
5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee
5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend
5909 000.341.60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies
5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable)
5954 604.237.00.00.0000 Special Deposits
5955 000.05.519.90.42.l Postage
5998 OOD.231.70.00.0000 Tax
Remaining Balance Due: $0.00
.DO
.OD
.DO
.OD
.OD
.OD
.00
.00
.OD
.OD
.00
.OD
.OD
.OD
.00
.OD
.OD
.DO
.DO
.OD
.OD
.OD
.DO
.OD
.OD
R0605995