Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA-06-172_Report 1Jim Carleton AHBL, Inc. PARTIES OF RECORD CEDAR RIVER CORPORATE PARK LUA06-172, SA-H, ECF Howard Seelig 621 Company 2215 N 30th Street ste: # 300 Tacoma, WA 98403 PO Box 1925 Bellevue, WA 98009 tel: (425) 746-9780 (owner) Tarragon -Cedar River Corp. Park, LLC 1000 Second Avenue ste: #3200 Seattle, WA 98104 tel: (253) 383-2422 eml: jcarleton@ahbl.com ( contact) Updated: 02/27/07 tel: (206) 233-9600 (applicant) (Page 1 of 1) )_ J 'l· . , CEDAR RIVER CORPORATE PARK SW 1/4, SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON SW 21ST STREET W£nAMl 'A' [CAT>;OOOV '1 WETLAfCI 'A' (CATEGORY 2J l -_,~ ... ..,, ~\1i'BL:t: . -:"'>";.,- w : ll,\1'1111 ·< \ I ._._. __ ] ,,,,1r,, ' •• ~:~,.-•• , •.• , •. ·~, .• -•• ..--:. __ ·,·:.'. ' ........ +•--.-• •• ..• \ -·-I • , .-.•. --.. ~j;-.~~~~-.. u=-··.--r-.\ u--. · .. -.. -.. ~ .. \'ffe, --~/~1.1m.--TJi: .. ~.,-.-.~ ... --.=,i l ~I •oo:;.,_s.;:~ / '; '·L.-J ~----w-------v--~~:r ··.·, t"l1·I D ,,,,,.. ,,,··Jl' , . c1.cLi\,,,,,1-h:. __ n tR_ o_ ~:D,,,,, ; 1· ;r / r 1i~-~~,7'.~=--" -'-'° I ' I\/ i&.JJ,Yd.,c;i ~., BLDG 8 I _,,, -1· w IJ: I Wt·· ~'.I! -,-'., , , I 29,940 S.F. ,., : ; G ---A:,-'''" ,..--,,:, , ~---~--~.-! -~ , . w~ ·=~~ ~ ~ "'~ I .,fr'/.<W/'?'! \,'_ ~-~ II / ;:;,:,.:i1.'.· .. }//fj.f' ~. I :,;!:.;;.--I:: i ~ I _,.,-'cc-;;,-I , ~' ·~ ~ ' ' ·.'1''. ! I I' I :'• ' ( :r BLDG A I 135,047 SF r •ll •1 i I . _ ( ,,--, I , · 1·: I ~ ·~~ -,'i i I I ~L C z ,I .. 1 ·,:~" ~ ' -~~~~~;-·' ,,. ,f--~--15N ~-___ _ -u 1·,-T· _J ··r -' I: , ·, I <M ! ' j' BLDG D -~!!!_ ,.· 1 ... r 'c: !..,, : ' ;.,. I '~ / · 1 t !t~~o\, . . ! e . .. I 11-J • --·.··.·:,-".~·.: .• 'c""·.··· ,.,__ ·~· ,,, ', ' I I ·:/.:-c .... :::\ rr . •/~I' ' I '' · "," ~ o ·. I _.JJ (J ,: v Q---~ =° ~ C) \'J H . ~ i :j . \~- ,E~· .: , - ' .1 \ ~o;:i~'--..:.__ ---· •,s·w al'i:-i ' %'t,'ff/ftd ' 'ftV i/f, 1 WOST '"'3£ OF ~Ref)/; I •wc>>G •s•?; Yffj 'i ' !f///Jfi ' ' ,_ ~: ':'-- WETLAMl • .,. <CATEOOFIY"' .... _,,,,._~"'' oc,·:,_,",& I . - --~fl! --~r (;),.a.Am TACOMA SC"-TT~C !;;:.S"';l;,"::,-'""'"" ,-..~,_, ;;;,f:,':;""" '""''""'--,.,.,,, ,, ' ,,, Cedar River Corporate Park Tarragon -Cedar Rl-...r Corp. Park L.L.C. •·: "' ,~ '"' ,,, ,., .. , .... ,,,,. •;;;•,;;";',';;,'' Issued For Site Plan Review ,,,;;% ~ .{>ti/:) ~:~~{/ ·-··1 Site Plan 80.1 I ' ' 1--~ I L W::PVd "dl:IO:J 1:13All:l l:l'v038 i i,' :,)J 1y ,-1i// &k '\~ ' "' : . .\ . . I ,Ii w I,,, '~ "'"' ii= I i, Ii, " z /i . !, 0 ~ i .",,'. -:, s j j j 11 ! ~ I • . ; ~ ~ ~ < ..J ~ '= "• .. 11 &~ ~ O< 18~ -~ ~~ "" wO , ·" >0 ' ;~ " . " m • I~ 0 u I ~25 1/) w,,"' I -~ 0 Lt) ' ~ >-Lt? ' <DW .. u.,Z f "' "' oo ~ oo,. >-~ i 3: ~ ' .-w 0 f--<;i.i ~ ~'" 0 Uc:.:: ! ~ '"" ! i <> ' ' o< ~ J Q r-= I I J ,-- Ii ' ~ ~ ' ! ! ! ' ! ' i i ll l Ii' -~_J_ I j I g 0 > " " O< orn •" 00 mo '" .. co >a r, ~ ' " ' I! ii ..... ~n ' -< ~ O><n r O r 0 ~ -I ' ":,; ... oo "' " "' ma, ' cc 01 -<"' 01 o- C.11 C: ~ 01 c"' -(J) g -~ .. g~ ,. ~· .. •o •• •• ~ ~ ~ ii! ~= I I I ~ CEDAR RIVER CORP. PARK ---;- ,-.. ,! "' "' ~~~ m m ... ~" z jii " m a~~ >< ::. jif:(!l ,. m ~ m 0 .,, 0 0 I I I I ... 11 .. "' ... m z ... "' ' G (i) CV 0 ® ® (i) ® I ,, ., ,) (if '"" ., ~- ~ @J I ' i @, .. ·." : I, : 1. . . I. . . I , . J_, . ' . : [ .. J· l. I . I. J =Lc:ic:::"R. PLAN E3U1Lc=>INC:.c f3 ----, ( _ -: _ 1·-1 ,L __ J I -~, -1 1,1riot11 111~11 µi1J,'1,Ai1 1 1l111 P~I iii ii Ii j, lµffi I ii I I I, ii I , , ····· jmpaj ,·_ '"·,." .,,., .. ,,,,,_ NC:,RTl--t EL EV A T_l~O~N _________ _ ~H i f ~ 1----l I j j I j j I I j 11 j j Q'.fM EAST ELEVATIC)'f'--.... ---- ,-,--- I '"'-"''• ··as,. SEC:TIC:::::,N A " .,.,,_ . ...,,.,_ ·~ ~ ,_,.,-.c.-,·=·=· '0,.,..,,-,cc"- ~i-± w=e,-ELEVATIC>N ~ l-c-,11 -0 I t --::r----,.ilt:L iQ j 1 -----1, -_; -·-· · --,_ : -·-1 'i ~ 1-,· !HI :I I D [ Hi I _J SC>U T 1---1 ELEV AT I C:,Nc._ ___________ _ ~ Hill V • ' '··· · .. · T =-•11• ,--,,.......-. ~~ --alir m•"'-4'- TACOM,o. Sl:ATTLC :ioi'7.'d'::':''...,."'"'°'T"""""-~'OH<JJ ;.:,f;:;."::7'"''"""''""'-""'" Cedar River Corporate Park Terr111Qn • Cedar Rlnr Corp. Park L.L.C. 1Xll /e.d '" '"" l'C•) ,.,,.,,,.,,,,, "''''""''""'1' ·o, ,., "~' Issued For SIie Plan Review 1/1·,/o~ ~"' . lfc},f,;•\,1 ·;.I-~,.,~ ~/:;;·~,~~~~ ._, !!,_ ,, ,'9>, -- ,. Building B Plan & Elevations 818 CEDAR RIVER CORP. PARK is' '. '. I , ----J: i'·, r---______ -__ -, . ·L I I I J ................................... '!'~!f.H.H~E SEE SHEET C10 CEDAR RIVER CORP. PARK_ -........ . ···················'.~\ ··1·······1···· ' ' / ' I i •· I I'• • ;;e ,, j! ' I I I e .' . ' ; I 'I , I I L : ,,,.,..,~.;; soc,· I , "' I ' ! ' :/ ' I ' I I I ' L i I' I I I I ' 'J I ' _______________________ J -·L el . ' I e e © 6 0 ·~·· ~ l 8 . ftJ e l <:>---.,,..,- ~, 0 @ G ,~ @ 0 ~ z 0 I " - ' J Ill z " 1 J l ~ O' 0 J IL ' 'J,' ' ' ' ,, ~I 'II , ~"' ,", < < I I z !1 0 f- <l > ill J ill f- <I) <l ill z 0 - f- <l > Ill J ill l f ~· Z· z 0 - f-q > Ill I ill l f-' J 0 <I) ' , ,".' ti -.!. '.·', Cl .... ID I s ~ ~ ~ I -- '~ ~ ~ -- I r ' _- - ,-~ I -~ ~ ~ j1j Ii' j r, ··:,..:_ ~ ,- I I ' I Lr r --' ~ ~ r r r r I B r r r I r r t- l=I ~ z 0 - f- 1 > ill J ill f- <I) ill =i ' @'P'·'' ' , ·1 ® (c}.' 8 I' C •:, 0 F ,,----.C'F2 ==-,_A.......__ 0 0 E,Ui ::::::OINC:. C- ,,0 ·n-" , s .. oe,c,, ',, ><', ' ~\':'.cc~::::'c·, SOUTI--I ELE '/AT i ON _____________ _ (, ' ~~::~'A ,.. (~ 1: ------' ,cc,,·~,:·-~· ~'111111111J ~:~.- WEST ELE'./ATION SEC:::TIC)N A ,,:r~-.;;:;-,."°- CD 0 ® ® ,, ~:· 1' -1 j ~~¢11 EAST ELE'./A-ION II lb~[ ~ofjf~',;±il Jo~ 11 '.~ -:11 -l1H 1 ~~ nil =d NORTI--I ELEV.AT ON l · \j l I 11 ' =::= •••• --'-' !rial" ----m ...... R. T.-.cOMA StcAT.,-LF ::~~,:';,""'--"' 1-.~,_, ,,,.,_, ....... -,,,,_,_, """' "'"'""" ,. ,,~. -~- i\ Cedar Fllver Corporate Park Tarragon • Ceder Rlwer Corp. Perk L.L.C. -, ,~ \ '.<-,., .. '"'' Issued For Site Plan Review y;--;;;,;,, F"i'':\ ~ , . " ., I Bulldlng C Plan & Elevations 81C 0) C ~. 0 0 (<) ®,,,, ® (i) ® ® ' ' ',, 'J -0,---,"-/q-"-r--'----1 I -- L @I I;! I,! ,'f ®1-I I - (0-. r br-' .. ·1~ . '!' 1-1· ,I 'I ;,'\\ "' , 1 ---Ir FLOOR. PLA""-..J. 5UILC>INGc A _______ _ -~~ ' 11 '' L l,!1 (" j -~ ,, __ ,,_,,_, ~ ·=;---- ., •.. , .. . . ( . .,~-T"=· ~, .... ~~····: I ~----=-~ . " ' ------. --·-··---@rdm i ciu~~JI_I.OJL il m&;;; 1 t tWQ µf WEST ELE',,.-"'ATlc::iN ~l~l;;Jg " NOF<=::TI--I ELEVATIOc:::_-N_'_ ____ _ -~-:-, .~ -~- ~ L, ,~,, -~ CSC-·.X'< -- SEC::.Tlc:>N A -,·,~·.,·.-,,·,·=·=· ~"' -·~c~..,; "'•c,_ ;-lw11~1d SOUTI--I ELEVATIO_"--l'_ ___ _ ---' ,' ~\:-?.,"---~.;~:_<G... f; I I I ~Ja.i~,k! 129 rt-i;t==I~j Ii ~ritl--; -§;1,m~iiA EAST ELEVATIC:,N ,t --~11 ,_,,..~ ~ m•..JI.A. 1~;,,;~-!~.;.;.,~~ ~;";".;,';;:n·"""''""·""'""~-,.,.,, Cedar River Corporate Park Tarr111on -Ceder Rl•fl' Corp. Part L.L.C. "~" *" ,w ,,,. ,, '""'·"'-"''' ;',~/ Issued For Site Plan Review I ·~~.:f"23). , ~i r} ·~·t;dt/'1 ·.,.., /~_ !!:,_ f::._ Building A Plan l Elevations 81A ,/ -----. I -,- 1' 'i -j • 1 ~ ,1,1 I 11 11 j ·.(li, I ,,I 't, ~ j ' " I '··-.'\ I I ~- ·.t"r __ ''> I .f : : llV,\ 3 I I' ~' :I~ ''<-} -HG8 .,1 I -=-: - 0 ·0· z I ' . - ;jla: !L " \~" ii " l ,,~~~ t~E.!:> w ,} Cll,\''111( ,,·.\ -</ ;,.! CEDAR RIVER CORPORATE PARK SW 1/4, SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON •, ' '" ,, ~·?;b ,·,1' '' : i I . , J,, ~:. 1923059013 i 1923059076 y 1923059081 0 zn -1;, -4-Ll ' : ' "·'"'~ '_' __ CCi H,L.LMA. N' .. S ..... ~.-.. " ___ PN.,GTQN" ,, GARO~~f ADD,!DtVf NP 1 i . ' •"-L-J-'f •JWH\'.. I "j !~! 1 ul ;::;:' ~j 1~! '' f -f '" ,f ·~ ,., i 'I" l, r- L 11 ·'11,\ -1 i:. S1W 21S"f s·rREE"T" \ \,} I,,; .. ,, 1• 1 l'.11:: '3340400425c, : • . : 33404()0585 :: " : : I . :, · ·, · · " ---·\\\i r, •;r-o""'F""'rr=jiJiiilliliJiiliii:_:::~-c:24 h} j' : ' i :JI ; :, ,, 3023059066 !r'F~" -_-;2f:J?ciJ;;;;~---. =:s,~;;r.~ .. c.;:,;.;.c - I . • 3023059083 :,,,.,,:,:::. ', ,, '.i ··\n -> \~~ -.-~·,;S_ -:.~z: ~;_;_o ;~ "" :.:::_ ...• =----all II!.. ·--~~ mu•l\ll'a TACOMA SE'ATTLC ,,.,_,..,_,.,,.'1(\0.,,...W•9M:JJ ,,,,.,,.~ -, ""'°'"""'"'·""'''"",., ... ,. .. ,,, ''"'""~' ;i,. ' /!>, 11\ Cedar River Corporale Park Tarragon -Cedar River Corp. Park L.l.C. ''" 1,, ,~ '"" '"'' "',, w, ,,-« "'''''•"''"'"'' ,· .. ,,.,,:, '""'·' Issued For Sile Plan Review J~-~~~ .. '.' .. /·i/':, ~;. . ...,;,/_#, "' I Neighborhood Detail Map N.D.M. ,, I ~ I ~. 0. a ea. a ' _ _J :li I _ _J l.:- )U:lVd "di:JO:J !:13M::l !:1~03:J ~ ' I . ' ' '1- <-I I -~ ---',, ---!..'~'·!_'-'.:,:_, --:~ ---·--J_j ~ \ I . I ·ti----~ I~~ I I -~ Ii ' ' I :I i l! ' ,, I I I ? .. ' . ' ~' ., : I ' ' I l IJ1l11 ' ' ' ! : I -l' -, I ' ' --_J I I i ' T >U::lltd "d!::108 !::131'11!::I t:J\ia:38 -" gJ C I() w=> "'•---!:o LC') <I) >-II) ::, ' mw.,. 0~ C'\I ~~*~ <I) "' > ' "~ " I! -1-, '"' Check Reque >r Non Vendor Refund or R 1bursement This form is to be used only for one time vendors. Please contact Accounts Payable if you have any questions regarding one time vendors. Check will be included in the next scheduled A/P check run and mailed after Council approval. Check Request Info: Date of request: 05-23-2013 Requestor's name: Carrie Olson Requestor 's department/division: CED/Dev Serv/Plan Review Requestor 's ext. #: 7235 I Payable to: Renton Cedar River Park LLC Mail address for check: . C/0 CRBE, Andrea Hacker, Asset Manaaer, 20415 72"d Ave S, Suite 210, Kent WA 98032 Check amount: Account number(s) to charge: $92,993.72 650.237.00.00.0000 Special Deposit Reason for refund or reimbursement: Cedar River Corp Park, Sensitive Area Wetlands Cash Bond, LUA06-172 Check handling request: Please mail check and attached documents directly to payee. Thanks *A roval Si nature: Date: Requestor's Department Administrator, Division Director or designee: . . 05-23-2013 * The person approving this check request must be an authorized signer. Amount per account #: I:\PlanReview\COUNTER\BONDRELS\SENSlTIVE AREA OR WETLAND MITlGA T!ON MATNTENANCE BONDS RELEASE LETIERS\LUA06-l 7 Cedar River Corpc111!e Park Wetland and Mitigation Maintenance & Monitoring Cash Bond Request.doc Online Typeable Form, July 2007 TRANSMITTAL TO CITY CLERK BONDS, LETTERS OF CREDIT, ASSIGNMENT OF FUND, ETC. 1. TYPE OF INSTRUMENT: Bond Letter of Credit __ Assignment of Funds/Contractor Set-Aside __ Assignment of Savings ~ Other, Describe . ...J.(l_,cy.A""""'-"-"0 +-/ ,,___ ____ _ I 2. APPLICANT:,' eda_c ~\J0,· c'o,parg~e_ "'?oy k_ fr:a_..-ra."cpn ct•,1 •. I , 3. PURPOSE: 10,,-l,,-\Qv:,Q,]?Pc~ortranu '50cQ1.-y /Lt.J'Ao1.,,-l,;J.. (Describe) I 4. ACCOUNTNO: ___________________ _ 5. FILE NAME AND NUMBER: ______________ _ (if applicable) 6. AMOUNT: .ii g -a, "l':J "l, 7;} 7. EXPRIATION DATE:_,_o'-'-0_,_:5..,_·~, \~\_v~'-~"~%rr'~~~,e~%1Tu~.e-5~c\-~------- 8. REQUIRED BY:_5"""-'-1_,_\ \,__,_bL.C;..LL.c...'=if*--~,1-) ..LJ-"";:,_,_\ 9_,___ ________ _ (Department/Board) 9. STAFFCONTACT/PHONE#: f\rn\::JQ, \-1,o~\Y'CtO x~alo"rt 10. NOTIFY STAFF BY: _________________ _ (List date 30 days prior, six weeks prior to expiration, etc.) ~. 4:;(),'><12-f{\J~~,L\.C. i ~:~i:{~~ ~415 -72.ct,gJ,-e:~~~i,'9i:i-ro /0?10f, vv;.of>"'~ og 2. .· ' ' ' Printed: 04-25-2007 Payment Made: ::::ITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA06-172 Receipt Number: R0701857 Total Payment: 04/25/2007 03:41 PM 92,993.72 Payee: TARRAGON-CEDAR RIVER CORP PARK Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description Amount 3954 650.237.00.00.0000 Special Deposits 92,993.72 Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment Check 12002 92,993.72 Account Balances Trans Account Code Description Balance Due 3021 303.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee 3954 650.237.00.00.0000 Special Deposits 5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat 5013 000.345.81.00.0010 PUD 5014 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Temp Use or Fence Review 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend 5909 000.341.60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable) 5954 650.237.00.00.0000 Special Deposits 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .DO .OD . 00 . 00 .OD .00 .OD .OD .OD .00 . 00 .OD .oo .00 .OD .00 .00 .00 :CIAL DEPOSIT TRANSMITT REFUNDING ADDRESS: /.\ .. ....: L . CITY: STATE: 1 .'A ZIP: '.:>-.-: ---------- PROJECT NAME: _________ :.·,_-'~·~· _-_' ·_·. _· ·~-~- --.. --) ) I ADDRESS LOCATION: / , ---------~-- PERMIT#: L 1 ' l, ,)(· ! ·-/ _:;_ '-i I -... DEPT. CONTACT: .._; '' J_), ;'.,' ·,.) SPECIAL DEPOSIT CONDITIONS: : <·-~-"i !_ _·1,-f. .. <·_1:: C::,1 f ';'. '.-L-,_-y1' ( H:~10N.!\OE','aOl'.S£JN:Je.i&A.AN.1NG'«.oo OEPT. Fc-is\t.llsc. BUllOINO !XCs\TBP.ATEll~. DEPOsrT WHITE AND YELLOW TO FINANCE. RETAIN PINK FOR PBPW RECORDS DATE: t!i):.,/0·7 RECEIPT# : @JO/ tS] FINANCE REC. #: AMouNT: $ q 2-,-::qg=a::--:-12-:,;----ru=-,,--,-12/J,,..,...o"""z,-- wo#: FUNCTION#:----- TYPE OF DEPOSIT: BUILDING 0 90 DAY TEMPORARY OCCUPANCY PERMIT 0 LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE 0 SIGN DEPOSIT 0 STREET CLEANING PUBLIC WORKS DPW CONSTRUCTION PERMIT PROPERTY SERVICES 0 LATE COMER FEE (TO BE RETURNED TO LCS HOLDER) 0 STY AC (APPRAISAL FEE DUE APPRAISER) BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS D BPWDEF (BPW DEFFERAL) (WO# 89150 FN# 5190 TRANS CODE #7054) fa. OTHER: ____________ _ Denis Law Mayor r f. ~ Department of Community and Economic Development CE."Chip"Vincent, Administrator December 28, 2012 Charlie Foushee Tarragon 1000 Second Ave, Suite 3200 Seattle, Washington 98104 Subject: Request for Status of Maintenance and Monitoring Cedar River Corporate Park Mitigation City of Renton-file LUA06-172 Dear Mr. Foushee: City of Renton Municipal Code requires that maintenance and monitoring reports be received quarterly for the first year and annually thereafter. The City has yet to receive your 3rd annual report which was due December 30, 2011. Additionally, your 4th annual report will be due on December 30, 2012. This letter serves as notice that you have 30 days upon receipt of this letter to submit the status of the mitigation project, or the matter will be turned over to the Code Compliance Section. Please submit this and all subsequent materials relating to the wetland mitigation project to my attention. 1 can be reached at 425-430-7219 with any questions. Sincerely, Roca le Timmons Associate Planner cc: City of Renton File LUAOG-172 Celeste Botha, Wetland Permitting Services Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Manager Donna Locher, Code Compliance Inspector Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov April 19, 2013 Charlie Foushee Tarragon 1000 Second Ave, Suite 3200 Seattle, Washington 98104 Department of Community and Economic Development C.E. "Chip"Vincent, Administrator Subject: Receipt of Fourth and Final Annual Maintenance and Monitoring Report Cedar River Corporate Park Mitigation City of Renton File LUA06-172 Dear Mr. Foushee: This letter is to inform you that I have accepted the fourth and final annual maintenance and monitoring report for the Cherie Lane II (North) Wetland mitigation project. Upon evaluation, it appears the project is in compliance with the established performance standards thereby satisfying the 5 year successful monitoring period requirement. I have initiated the paperwork to release the surety, in the amount of $92,993.72. If you have any general questions please contact me at (425) 430-7219 or Carrie Olson with questions in regards to the release of your surety at (425) 430-7235. Sincerely, Rocale Timmons Associate Planner cc: City of Renton File LUA06-172 Celeste Botha, Wetland Permitting Services Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Manager Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton,Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Carrie, M E M O R A N D U M April 3, 2013 Carrie Olson Rocale Timmons Release of Assignment of Funds Cedar River Corporate Park Mitigation City of Renton File LUA06-172 Please initiate the paperwork to release, the bond for the mitigation project for the Cedar River Corporate Park. The amount is for approximately $92,993.72. A copy of the paperwork should also go in the yellow file and to the City Clerk's office. Thank you! h:\ced\planning\current planning\wet!ands\cedar river corporate park\release memo.docx YEAR. 5 -FALL 2012 City of Renton Plc1nn1no u · . ·0 /Vision JAN fi 9 1013 BUFFER. ENHANCEMENT MONITOR.ING REP&/?({;~ll\'f ~{Q) CEDAR. RNER. COR.POR.A TEP ARK PIUl'\RI[) roR: Andrea Hacker I Real Estate Manager CB Richard Ellis I Asset Services 20415 72nd Avenue South, Suite 210 Kent, WA 98032 PIZfl'\l{S[) rw: l .lUS 11 BOTI IA WETLAND PERMITTING SERVICES PO Box 16o1 Mercer Island, Wa•hin~on q8o40 (1o6) •404413 wr-@••p.com DI ll \\l\lR II, 2012 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Cedar River Corporate Park site is located east of Lind Avenue SW, as shown in Figure 1, at 2200 Lind Avenue SW (Parcel 3340400285). A Wetland Buffer Mitigation Plan, dated April 16, 2007, was prepared by WPS. The plan was approved by the City of Renton and implementation was completed on February 13, 2008. FIGURE 1: VICINITY MAP This report presents a summary of enhancement measures, goals, a description of the approved and actual monitoring protocol, performance standards, results of the Year 5 Fall monitoring effort obtained on December 4, 2012, and includes tables showing percent cover, photographs corresponding to those in the Year 1 (2009) report, as well as recommendations for maintaining mitigation goals. 2. MITIGA TIO!',; GOALS & 0BJ[C I IVFS The goal of the mitigation plan was to compensate for permanent impacts resulting from biofiltration swales and for temporary impacts due to clearing and placement of additional fill material in wetland buffers. A total of 453 shrubs and 99 trees were specified within the 11,358 square foot temporary buffer impacts ar~a. 704 hardy ground covers were also planted per the planting plan. In addition, 400 conifer tree seedlings were planted within the undisturbed buffer; per the approved plan, no monitoring of the seedling tree plantings within the undisturbed buffer area has been performed. 3. Prn,FORMAJ\CE STANDARDS Performance standards proposed in the original mitigation plan are as shown in Table 1. 3 TABLE 1: PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FROM THE CEDAR RIVER CORPORATE PARK BUFFER MITIGATION PLAN Criterion Year2 Year3 Native plant cover{%) (includes herbaceous) 20-30 30 · 70 Native woody plant cover{%) Non-native, invasive plant cover{%) Plant survivorship Species diversity Since the mitigation plan was developed, research conducted for the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) resulted in recommendations for developing performance standards for wetland mitigation plans (WSDOT Environmental Services Office, 2008). Among these recommendations one in particular has application to this project at this time and is quoted below. WSDOT Recommended Woody Vegetation Performa nee Criteria In scrub-shrub and forest wetland zones an mitigation sites in the lowlands of Puget Sound, WSDOT monitoring results suggest woody cover targets of 50 percent may be possible five years after planting is completed. Performance Measures and Standards: Five to Ten Years after Planting Woody species cover is one of the most common measures of plant community growth and development because it is unbiased by either the size or distribution of individual plants (Floyd and Anderson 1987). Although it is a common metric, woody species caver is often difficult to measure with any reasonable level of accuracy and precision one ta three years after initial plant establishment. Quantitative aerial caver estimates far immature trees and shrubs with few leaves are impracticable, and results generally lock value from o statistical, ecological, or management perspective (Elzinga et al. 2001). WSDOT monitoring results support these conclusions and indicate growth of trees and shrubs is typically slow through the first several years of site development. On many sites, o growth surge does not occur until four to five years ofter planting. When plant growth is delayed, interim targets for woody species cover are not a strong indicator of eventual success. However~ as a performance measure or performance standard five years ofter sites are planted, monitoring data indicate that woody cover is both o measurable and meaningful attribute (WSDOT 2001 through 2008). These data show that if targets ore not set tao high, aerial cover estimates for trees and shrubs provide o reasonable gouge of plant community development five to 10 years after initial plant establishment. Benchmarks far Woady Species Cover in Wetlands In scrub-shrub and forest wetland zones on mitigation sites in the lowlands of Puget Sound, WSDOT monitoring results suggest woody cover targets of 50 percent may be possible five years ofter planting is completed. Targets far wetland woody species cover should be lower for sites in southwest and eastern Washington. Though data from WSDOT mitigation sites in these regions ore limited, o reasonable target might be 20 percent five years after planting (WSDOT 2001 through 2008). Appendix A provides o summary of these data. Other studies support these findings ond suggest standards that require high cover of woody species soon ofter initial plant establishment ore unrealistic in most coses. In addition, efforts ta achieve high cover of woody species in short timeframes may have unintended negative consequences. For example~ Cassatt 4 {1998} found high plant densities are required in the Puget Sound region to produce greater than 40 percent wetland woody species cover three years after planting. For large mitigation sites, high planting densities are expensive and may be a waste of plant material over the long term as individual trees and shrubs compete with one another five to ten years after planting. Celedonia (2002) found woody species cover targets of 80 percent could not be reliably achieved until eight years after planting for wetland trees and shrubs in the lowlands of Puget Sound. This study also suggests that high planting densities (greater or equal to 3,000 stems per acre) contribute to rapid establishment of canopy cover. However, the author cautions, high stem densities may inhibit development of other desirable features in the woody species plant community including plant maturity, emergence of a forest canopy, and vertical stratification. Summary WSDOT proposes the following approach for establishing interim performance measures and final-year performance standards far woody vegetation on WSDOT wetland mitigation projects: • Woody species survival and density estimates may be used to document the success of site planting efforts in the first year plant establishment period. • Survival estimates should not be used to document the success of woody species planting efforts after the first year plant establishment period. • Woody species plant density may be used to guide site management activities one to three years after planting. Native woody plants naturally colonizing mitigation sites should be included in plant density estimates. • Performance measures or performance standards for woody species cover should not be used until five years after initial site planting has been completed. • Far scrub-shrub and forest wetland-planting zones on mitigation sites in the lowlands of western Washington, a native woody species target of 50 percent aerial cover is often achievable five years after planting. For sites in southwest or eastern Washington, a target of 20 percent aerial cover may be reasonable. TABLE 2: PROPOSED NEW PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR THE CEDAR RIVER CORPORATE PARK BUFFER MITIGATION PROJECT Criterion Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year4 Plant density 5' on 5' on center center spacing spacing Native woody plant cover(%) Plant survivorship Species diversity Non~native, invasive plant cover(%) s Species diversity was not addressed in the WSDOT guidelines so the standards provided below refer to those set in the original wetland buffer mitigation plan. The following minimum standards established in the Cedar River Corporate Park buffer mitigation plan continue to apply towards both planted and volunteer species, within the various strata: • trees= 4 species, at least 1 of which must be coniferous • shrubs = 5 species • ground cover = 2 species 3./ (.c_,NTf/.Ol OF NOXIOUS & !NV!L,/lt Sl'l lll, 5 Noxious weeds (identified on state noxious weeds lists) including giant and Japanese knotweeds (Polygonum sachalinense, P. cuspidatum) must be entirely and properly eliminated, and disposed of, from the site prior to installation, and throughout the monitoring period. Reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinaceae), Scot's broom (Cytisus scoparius), English ivy (Hedera helix), creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens), and Himalayan and evergreen blackberries (Rubus armeniacus, R. laciniatus), may not exceed 10% total cover per species (i.e., up to 10% cover of each species may be allowed) throughout the monitoring period up to a total of no greater than 20% cover from invasive species. 3.2 FENCES AND SIGNS Fences and signs will be inspected during the maintenance visits and must be in good repair. 4. MONITORJNG PR.OTOCOL To evaluate cover, four permanent line-intercept transects totaling 324.4 linear feet were established and marked in the field with flagging and metal tags, as shown in Figure 2. The cover of invasive and installed plant species was evaluated using the line-intercept method along each transect. A pole was used to align at a 90-degree angle with a tape that was drawn between the two transect end points. The point at which the first leaves of each plant intersect along the tape length was recorded, as was the last leaf along the tape; this is called the "intercept length". Percent cover of each plant was calculated by recording the intercept length of each plant and dividing it by the total length of the transect. Total cover was determined by adding together the cover of each of these sometimes overlapping plants and, again, dividing by the length of the transect. Overall cover was determined by adding the total intercept lengths at each of the four transects and dividing the sum by the total length of the four transects. Sampling percent cover did not include the existing forested canopy but did include volunteer native plants and invasive species. Species diversity was determined by indicating each species encountered within the zone along each transect, whether or not they were encountered along the transect itself. • "• • ••. o, C (!. 11 Transect. 3: 101' -~-- .......... __ FIGURE 2: LOCATIONS OF MONITORING TRANSECTS 6 • • The monitoring schedule Is reproduced below in Table 3. Year 1 TABLE 3: MONITORING & MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE Maintenance Visits Between January 1 and March 1 AND Between Aprll 1 and June 1 AND Monitoring Between January 1 and March 1 AND Between April 1 and June 1 AND Report due March 30 June 30 Between July 1 and September 30 Between July 1 and September 30 October 30 Between October 15 and December 30 Between October 15 and December 30 January 31 2-5 Between April 1 and June 1 AND Between July 1 and September 30 5. MONITOR.ING R.ESULTS Between September 1 and October 15 December 30 The Year 5 Fall monitoring event occurred late, on December 4, 2012, Photographs were taken of the entire enhancement area from the same locations as in previous monitoring reports, which, due to the lateness of the monitoring event, allow the viewer to see further along the buffer length than were they to have been taken in summer, when leaves of nearer plants would obscure the view. Photographs are provided in Appendix 1. Table 5 presents a summary of Year 5 monitoring results relative to performance standards. As can be seen, at 89% the project nearly achieves the Year 5 native plant cover standard of 100% proposed In the mitigation plan for installed native plant cover and, at 64.3%, does meet the standard of 60 -80% for native woody plant cover. The project handily meets the less than 10% standard for invasive species cover overall. A summary of Year 5 cover monitoring results is shown in Table 5. As with all previous years, Transect 3 representing the north planting area shown in photos 14 through 16 (Appendix 1) remains substandard. TABLE 4: MONITORING RESULTS RELATIVE TO ORIGINAL & PROPOSED PERFORMANCE STANDARDS: VEAR 5 · FALL 2012 Standards from Proposed new Actual 2012 Criterion mitigation plan standards results Native plant cover(%) (includes groundcover) 100% 89.1% Native woody plant cover(%) 60-80 50% 64.3% Non-native, invasive plant cover(% ): S10% S10% 2.4% Species diversity Trees (all native planted and volunteer species) 4 6 Shrubs (all native planted and volunteer species) 8 11 Ground covers (all planted species plus volunteers) 3 3 Fences & Signs Good Good 6. ANALYSIS OF R.l::SULTS Although the results presented In Table 4 indicate that the site nearly meets or exceeds all of the originally proposed standards, and exceeds all of the new proposed standards for Year 5, the north planting areas adjacent to rain gardens continues to underperform relative to the south and east planting areas. It is apparent that maintenance efforts have been intense and effective, and, despite repeated efforts to replant and irrigate, woody plants continue to struggle due to intense sun exposure and poor soil conditions. Nevertheless, overall, the project is successful and eventually pioneer tree specie, such as red alder, black cottonwood and big-leaf maple, as well as shrubs such as salal are likely to populate the raingarden berm. 7 TABLE 5: 2012 COVER MONITORING RESULTS Transect Transect Transect Transect Transect 1 2 3 4 Transect length: 77.6 94 101 52.5 325.1 C C .E C :;; :c ,: :;; '" Length ·"" Length "' Length ·" Length 3 " ~ " ~ " 3 ., Plant ~ C % cover of cover ~ C %cover of cover ~ C %cover of cover ~ C %cover of cover C 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 O> N along along 0, N along along Q> N along along 0, N along ~ ~ ~ ~ along %cover E E ., ., a: ~ "' transect transect .. transect transect transect transect "' transect transect overall Trees 53.4% 41A · 12.9% 12,1 9.5% 9,6 56.2" 29;1 IIL99l. Acer macrophytlum Big-leaf maple .( A/nus rubro Red alder ,I' ,I' ,I' ,I' Populus balsamijera Black cottonwood .( ,I' Prunus virginJana bitter cherry ,I' ,I' Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas fir .( .( .( .( • Rhamnus purshiana cascara .( .( .( Thuja p/icoto Western red cedar .( Shrubs 48.2% S7A 411.9% 46.1 !ii,% U,1 41';7ff 2~ 16.11%, Acer circinatum vine maple .( .( .( .( Berberis aquifolium tall Oregon grape .( .( .( .( Cornus cericea red-osier dogwood .( .( Crataegus douglasii Douglas hawthorn .( .( .( Oemleria cerasiformis !ndianplum ..( .( .( ..( Ribes sanguineum red.flowering currant .( .( Rosa nutkana Nootka rose .( .( ,I' .( Rubus parvifforus Thimbleberry .( .( .( Sambucus racemosa red elderberry Spiraea douglossii Douglas spirea .( .( ./ ..( Symphoricarpos a/bus snowberry .( .( Total native woody cover 101.5% 74.0 62,2" 58.2 21.S" 24.4 98;9" $1.9 e.u" Groundcovers 14.3" 28.3 41.7" 49;7 2.7" 2.7 4,6% Z,4 25,65 • Berberis nervosa short Oregon grape Gauftheria shallon salal .( .( .( .( Blechnum spicont Deer tern .( Polystichum munitum western sword fern .( .( .( .( Total native species cover 115.9" 102.3 103,8" 107.9 24.2" Z4A 101% 54.S 88.9" lnvaslves Cirsium vulgaris Bullthistle .( .( Cytisus scopadus Scot's broom .( Equisetum arvense Common horsetail Lotus ccrniculatus Swe-et dover .( ./ Rubus armeniacus Himalayan blackberry ,/ .( .( .( Ranuncu/us repens creeping buttercup ..( Total Invasive species cover 0,0% o.o 2.4% 3.1 4.7% 4.7 0.0% 0.0 2.4" 7. !lECOMMENDA TIONS As, overall, the project has met its performance standards, further monitoring should no longer be required on this site and the project's performance surety should be released to the applicant. 8. llEPOR T LIMITA TIOJ\S The information contained herein is, to our knowledge, correct and accurate. We are not responsible for the accuracy of information provided by others. Within the limitations of schedule, budget, and scope-of-work, we warrant that this study was conducted in accordance with generally accepted environmental science practices, including the technical guidelines and criteria in effect at the time of this study. The results and conclusions of this report represent the authors' best professional judgment based upon information provided by the project proponent and information obtained during the course of this study. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. Signed: Celeste Botha APPENDIX l: MONITOR.ING PHOTOGRAPHS SEPTEA1B[R 2008 \'\l) DECE~1BER 2012 11 .... ... RI a, > 00 0 0 N LI\ ... co a, > N .-t 0 N Photo 1: SA East September 2008 Photo 4: SA East, December 2012 Photo 2 : SA West September 2008 Photo 3: SB East September 2008 Photo 5 : SA, December 2012 Photo 6: SB East, December 2012 ..-1 ... "' cu > I 00 0 0 N in ... "' cu > N ..-1 0 N Photo 7: SC East Septembe r 2008 Photo 10: SC East, December 2012 Photo 8 : SD East September 2008 Photo 9 : SE East September 2008 Photo 11: SD East, December 2012 Photo 12: SE East, December 2012 ~ "-nl a, > I co 0 0 N N .-t 0 N Photo 13: SF Ea st September 2008 Photo 16: SF East, December 2012 Photo 14 : SG East Septe mb e r 2008 Photo 15 : SX West September 2008 Photo 17: SG East, December 2012 Photo 18: SX West, Decem ber 2012 .... ... RI Cl.I > I 00 0 0 N U'I ... RI Cl.I > N .... 0 N Photo 19: SX North September 2008 Photo 22: SX North, December 2012 Photo 20: EA North September 2008 Photo 21: EB North September 2008 Photo 23 : EA North, December 2012 Photo 24: EB North, December 2012 Photo 25: Detenti on Pond looking north September 2008 Photo 26: Detention Po nd looking north, December 2012 .... '- (U a, > I co 0 0 N N .... 0 N Photo 27: Raingarden looking west September 2008 Photo 30: Raingarden looking west, Decembe r 2012 Photo 28: Between ra i ngardens September 2008 Photo 31: Between raingardens, December 2012 Photo 29: West raingarden look ing west September 2008 Photo 32: West raingarden looking west, Decembe r 2012 NOTE: Monitoring Photographs are Indexed to the features identfled here. _._ __ . . {) 0--D L1 _ . fL _n. . _ n D, I C j -I F CFD~---------l L C I::, ]! ~~1 {i r bD i::, _.r!I ~··~ ~ c; I ii I; I I -, '-*. EB ~ ~ ~ ··' ~?0\/ "I I k •'i EA (T vG D~Q SF SG Index Sheet for Monitoring PhotDgraphs ·--CED.AR RIVER CORPORATE PAl<K YEAR3 FALL BUFFER ENHANCEMENT MONITOR.ING REPOR. T CEDAR R.IVER. CORPORATE PARK PREPARED FOR: CHARLIE FOUSHEE TARR.~GO". DEVELOPMENT 1000 SECO"D AVENUE SUITE 3200 SEATTLE, WA 98104 (206) 233-9600 i'R EP.~R_ED BY: CFUSTE BOTHA WETL\.ND PERMITTING SERVICES ("'6) "'"7n5 wp,@l,p.com 2o'Z5 South Na~ Stnii:,t: Seattle. Wuhinpn 9181.ff 0[CC\1BER 7, 2010 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMAR. Y The Cedar River Corporate Park site is located east of Lind Avenue SW, as shown in Figure 1, at 2200 Lind Avenue SW (Parcel 3340400285). A Wetland Buffer Mitigation Plan, dated April 16, 2007, was prepared by WPS. The plan was approved by the City of Renton and implementation was completed on February 13, 2008. --. " .---- +. ,"" FIGURE 1: VICINITY MAP This report presents a summary of enhancement measures, goals, a description of the approved and actual monitoring protocol, performance standards, results of the Year 3 Fall monitoring effort obtained on November 15, 2010, and includes tables showing percent cover, photographs corresponding to those in the Year 2 report, as well as recommendations for maintaining mitigation goals. 2. MITIGATION GOALS & OBJECTIVES The goal of the mitigation plan was to compensate for permanent impacts resulting from biofiltration swales and for temporary impacts due to clearing and placement of additional fill material in wetland buffers. A total of 453 shrubs and 99 trees were specified within the 11,358 square foot temporary buffer impacts area. 704 hardy ground covers were also planted per the planting plan. ln addition, 400 conifer tree seedlings were planted within the undisturbed buffer; per the approved plan, no monitoring of the seedling tree plantings within the undisturbed buffer area has been or will be performed. 3. PER.FOR.MANCE ST ANDAR.DS Performance standards are shown below in Table 1; explanations for elements of the Performance Standards are provided below. 2 TABLE 1: PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Criterion Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Native plant cover(%) (includes herbaceous) 20 -30 30-70 i 70-90 100 Nativewoodyplantcover(%) 20-30 \ 40-60 I 60-80 i 80-85 ~-· --'----'----'----l Non-native, invasive plant cover(% J (see notes below) ----'---'----'---'-------Plant survivorship (see notes below) Species diversity (see notes below) 3./ SPECIES DIVERSITY The following minimum standards apply to species diversity of native plants, including both planted and volunteer species, within the various strata: • trees= 4 species, at least 1 of which must be coniferous • shrubs::: 5 species • ground cover= 2 species 3.2 PLANT SUR VIVORSHIF 100% survivorship was guaranteed by the landscaping contractor for the first year after installation; thereafter no survivorship standard was established. The intention to drop the survivorship standard after Year 1 was presented in each of the four Year 1 quarterly reports. As noted, survivorship is not a viable long-term determinant of success; therefore, no survivorship monitoring was conducted in 2010. 3.3 CONTROL OF NOXIOUS & INVASIVE SPECIES Noxious weeds {identified on state noxious weeds lists) including giant and Japanese knotweeds (Polygonum sachalinense, P. cuspidatum) must be entirely and properly eliminated, and disposed of, from the site prior to installation, and throughout the monitoring period. Reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinaceae), Scot's broom (Cytisus scoparius), English ivy (Hedera helix), creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens), and Himalayan and evergreen blackberries (Rubus armeniacus, R. laciniatus), may not exceed 10% total cover per species (i.e., up to 10% cover of each species may be allowed) throughout the monitoring period up to a total of no greater than 20% cover from invasive species. 3. 4 FENCES AND SIGNS Fences and signs will be inspected during the maintenance visits and must be in good repair. 4. MONITOR.ING PR.OTOCOL To evaluate cover, four permanent line-intercept transects totaling 325.1 linear feet were established and marked in the field with flagging and metal tags, as shown in Figure 2. The cover of invasive and installed plant species was evaluated using the line-intercept method along each transect. Percent cover is calculated by measuring the intercept length of each species along a tape drawn between the two transect end points, divided by the total length. Overall cover was determined by adding the total intercept length of each species at each transect and dividing the sum by the total length of the four transects. Sampling percent cover of installed and invasive plants did not include the existing forested canopy, which averaged approximately 20% cover. Species diversity was determined during survivorship monitoring. Native volunteer species were included in the diversity numbers. 3 NOTE; PL.ANTS LOCATED ON DETAIL SHEETS$ -1 THROUGH S-6,AND E-1 THROUGH E -3 ARE Pl.ANTED WITHIN THE ENHANCEMENT AREA LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE INDICATED PARKING ST ALL. PLANTS LOCATED ON SHEETS N-1 THROUGH N -4 ARE LOCATED IN THE APPROXIMATE ORDER SHOWN. Overview As-Built and Monitorilg Map -:;' --CEDA'< RIVER CORPORATE PARK ·-' --··· ---- FIGURE 2: LOCATIONS OF MONITORING TRANSEITT The monitoring schedule is reproduced below in Table 2. Vear 1 2-5 TABLE 2: MONITORING & MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE Maintenance Visits Between January 1 and March 1 AND Between April 1 and June 1 AND Between July 1 and September 30 Between October 15 and December 30 Between April 1 and June 1 AND Between July 1 and September 30 Monitoring Between January 1 and March 1 AND Between April 1 and June 1 AND Between July 1 and September 30 Between October 15 and December 30 Between September 1 and October 15 5. MONITORJNG R_ESUL TS Report due March 30 June 30 October 30 January 31 December 30 The Year 3 Fall monitoring event occurred on November 15, 2010. Photographs were taken of the entire enhancement area from the same locations as in previous monitoring reports. Photographs are provided in Appendix 1. A summary of Year 3 cover monitoring results is shown in Table 3. 4 Transect Length of transect: Plant Trees Total trees· Acer macrophyllum Big-leaf maple A/nus rubra Red a!der Prunus virginiana bitter cherry Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas fir Rhamnus purshiana cascara Thuja pficata Western red cedar Shrubs Total·shrubs: Acer circinatum vine maple Berberis aquifolium tall Oregan grape Crataegus dougfasii Douglas hawthorn Oem/eria cerosiformis Indian plum Ribes sanguineum red-flowering currant Rosa nulkona Nootka rose Rubus parviflorus Thimbleberry Sambucus racemosa red elderberry Spiraea dauglassii Douglas spirea Sympharicarpos a/bus snowberry Groundcovers Total _£roundcovers· Berberis nervasa short Oregon grape Gaultheria shallan salal Blechnum spicant Deer fern Polystichum munitum western sword fern lnvasives Total invasives: Cirsium vulgaris Bu!lthistle Equisetum arvense Common horsetail Latus carniculatus Sweet clover Rubus armeniacus Himalayan blackberry Volunteer native Total volunteer natives: Papulus balsamifera Black cottonwood Salix spp. Willow Cornus cericea red-osier dogwood Total·natiVe-wood_y: Total native: 1 77.6 % cover along transect 75% 36% 36% 0% 2% 0% 0% 35% 2% 1% 0% 2% 2% 15% 0% 0% 9% 5% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% TABLE 3: 2010 COVER MONITORING RESULTS Length of cover along transect 29.9 ---- a.a 28.0 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 27.5 1.3 07 0.0 1.8 1.4 11.5 0.0 0.0 6.9 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 a.a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 94 % cover along transect 10% 0% 0% 4% 4% 2% 0% 47% 3% 4% 0% 4% 6% 12% 2% 0% 11% 5% 24% -. 0% 2% 10% 12% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% Length of cover along transect 9.5 a.a 0.0 3.7 4.1 1.7 0.0 43.9 2.6 3.9 0.0 3.5 5.7 11.3 2.3 0.0 10.2 4.4 22,9 ---- 0.0 1.8 9.6 11.5 o.o a.a 0.0 a.a 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 1.2 3 101 % cover along transect 12% 0% 2% 2% 6% 2% 0% 12% - 2% 0% 0% 0% ·-- 2% 0% 1% 0% 6% 1% 0% --- 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% Oo/o -· Length of cover along transect 11.5 0.0 2.4 1.5 5.7 1.9 0.0 11.9 ---- 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.8 0.0 5.8 0.9 a.a a.a 0.0 0.0 0.0 a.a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.7 0.0 0.0 4 52.5 % cover along transect 49% 0% 39% 8% 0% 0% 2% 11% ---- 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 5% 2% 0% 4% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 9% 9% 0% 0% i Total: Length of cover along transect 25.5 0.0 20.5 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.9 5.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 1.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 1.0 0.0 a.a 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 a.a 0.0 0.0 4.7 4.7 0.0 0.0 325.1 % cover overall 24% 0% 16% 3% 4% 1% 0% 27% 2% 1% 0% I 2% ! 3% I ! 8% 1% 0% 8% 3% 7% 0% 1% 3% 4% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 2% 0% 0% 53% 60% Table 4 presents a summary of Year 3 monitoring results. As can be seen in Table 4, the project meets the Year 3 cover standards for both installed native plant cover and invasive species cover overall, but cover within Transect 3 representing the north planting area shown in photos 30 through 32 (Appendix 1) is substandard. TABLE 4: MONITORING RESULTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE STANDARDS: YEAR 3 -FALL 2010 Criterion Native plant cover(%) (includes groundcover) Native woody p[ant cover(%) Non-native, invasive plant cover(% ): Noxious weeds Reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinaceae) Scot's broom {Cytisus scoparius) English ivy (Hedera helix) Creeping buttercup (Ranuncu/us repens) Himalayan blackberry (Rubus procerus) Evergreen blackberry (R. laciniatus) -~---------- Species diversity Trees (all planted species plus cottonwood) Shrubs (all planted species plus willow and dogwood) Ground covers (all planted species plus numerous volunteers) Fences & Signs Standard Actual 30-70 53% 40-60 60% 0% 0% 10% 0% 10% 0% 10% 0% 10% 0% 10% 0% 10% 0% 4 7 8 12 3 >6 Good Good Besides formal monitoring1 observations were noted regarding problem areas. These observations are discussed in the Analysis of Results section below. 6_ ANALYSIS OF RES UL TS Although the results presented in Table 4 indicates that the site meets or exceeds all standards for Year 3, some issues remain to be resolved, particularly pertaining to the north planting areas adjacent to rain gardens1 which continue to underperform relative to the south and east planting areas, despite repeated efforts to replant and irrigate. Due to the late date of Year 3 monitoring event, invasive species cover may have been underestimated since most herbaceous weeds are dormant by mid-November. However, no dead stems were observed within any of the transects so it is apparent that maintenance efforts have been intense and effective. 7. RECOMMENDATIONS Since the Year 4 cover standard for native cover goes up to between 70 and 90%, performance in the north planting area represented by Transect 3 will likely determine success or failure to meet the Year 4 cover standard. Therefore, dose attention should be paid to this area through the summer months of 2011. Irrigation of all areas should be discontinued with the exception of this north planting area and the area south of the detention pond (Sheet E-3). Additional mulch should be applied where needed, particularly in the north planting area. Dead plants should be replaced between December 2010 and March 2011. We continue to recommend strict adherence to the maintenance schedule provided in Section 4. Maintenance shall consist of removing weeds, repairing and replacing damaged fences and buffer signage, and refreshing mulch where needed. Weeds should be disposed of properly in an approved location. 8. KEPOR_ T LIMITATIONS The information contained herein is 1 to our knowledge, correct and accurate. We are not responsible for the accuracy of information provided by others. Within the limitations of schedule, budget, and scope-of-work, we warrant that this study was conducted in accordance with generally accepted environmental science practices, including the technical guidelines and criteria in effect at the time of this study. The results and conclusions of this report represent the authors' best professional judgment based upon information provided by the project proponent and information obtained during the course of this study. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. Signed: Celeste Botha 7 APPENDIX 1: MONITORING PHOTOGRAPHS AUGUST 17, 2009 AND NOVEMBER. IS, 2010 Photo 1: SA East August 17, 2009 Photo 2: SA West August 2009 Photo 3: SB East August 2009 Photo 4: SA East, November 15, 2010 Photo 5: SA, November 15, 2010 Photo 6: SB East, November 15, 2010 Photo 7: SC East August 2009 Photo 8: SD East August 2009 Photo 9: SE East August 2009 Photo 10: SC East, November 15, 2010 Photo 11: SD East, November 15, 2010 Photo 12: SE East, November 15, 2010 Photo 13: SF East August 2009 Photo 14: SG East August 2009 Photo 15: SX West August 2009 Photo 16: SF East, November 15, 2010 Photo 17: SG East, November 15, 2010 Photo 18: SX West, November 15, 2010 Photo 19: SX North August 2009 Photo 20: EA North August 2009 Photo 21: EB North August 2009 Photo 22: SX North, November 1S, 2010 Photo 23: EA North, November 15, 2010 Photo 24: EB North, November 15, 2010 Photo 25: Detention Pond looking north August 2009 Photo 26: Detention Pond looking north, November 15, 2010 Photo 27: Raingarden looking west August 2009 Photo 30: Raingarden looking west, November 15, 2010 Photo 28: Between raingardens August 2009 Photo 31: Between raingardens, November 15, 2010 Photo 29: West raingarden looking west August 2009 Photo 32: West raingarden looking west 1 November 15, 2010 NOTE: Monitoring Photographs are Indexed to the features identified here. --~·-,, __ Ra~'inga~ens __ ,~_:_"~---{---: .• ,-~ <·,::.:' ?-.-,---·'.' -~.--· .. ,. __ ·.-_"_ ·· __ --· · -.~_ .. -,,--.::r---u-----u----i ---r ,~' !''. ' ; ---L·--··:;;-r' ,/ C: ~' ~ u-:..:._:_-= ~--i_r:c..:cc:.-=-u--'-----'-"-'---· c;-[l _ n _ F:"\ i/ :§ ~ ""i ---,__ . r ,, " o - 1:~ c1 ---S: Ll Q _R n -9, ,:. r//i ~-.c.. I ,, l _ I 11 '-·.-·-I.,, : " .-I ·-·-, C , 1 ,~~- 1 0 ', : -:_, _ :~, , r CFiJ -·-'-'"' I .,: ,- /', C I' ]'.-~.I ·~ I . m, 1 ! 1kr1 =, -•. _. . L Cl [ ~ .p ct.~' ,a I Ii' 1 , CJ~)~;" ~-~~---"JJ) ~J-IT -0 ~ 1~,~--,/ [-EA u u ~L ~--__ I ' i _/ ···-~: I \ ,,.--____ I I JJ ~ -fl~,,; ' ;(i 1 ____ Jl~-:c -~--. ---· . _-_ ·,r· "-,-.... · ~·~·-;, ·-1-~~.-·~---·,,·~,c,: __ -:-1"' -----------. _ - ': . .I -1· __ -: -:_:_-·=·~·~ -·--------------·sx SA SB SC SD SE SF SG pir-:'111 '(illwi -~-~ ::. [ Index Sheet for Monitoring Photographs -----~e.2!;,J_ CEQAR RIVER CORPORATE PARK ! Denis Law Mayor February 1, 2011 Charlie Foushee Tarragon Development 1000 2°' Ave Ste #3200 Seattle, WA 98104 Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator Subject: Receipt of Second Annual Wetland Maintenance and Monitoring Report Cedar River Corporate Park City of Renton File LUA06-172 Dear Mr. Foushee: I received the second annual (Year 3) Maintenance and Monitoring report for the Cedar River Corporate Park mitigation project on January 6, 2011. The project appears to be meeting its established performance standards and is considered in compliance. Two copies of your next scheduled maintenance and monitoring report are due to the city by December 30, 2011. If you have any questions, please contact me at (425) 430-7219. Sincerely, 1~ Current Planning Division cc: City of Renton File No. LUA06-162 Celeste Botha, Wetland Permitting Services Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov Laureen M. Nicolay From: Sent: Murphy McCullough [MMcCullough@Tarragon.com] Wednesday, December 15, 2010 1 :44 PM To: Laureen M. Nicolay Cc: Subject: gbertch@mrsinvestments.com; Mark K. Funke Cedar River Corporate Park I Wetland Deposit Swap Thank you for your help today Laureen. As requested please see contact information below for Greg Bertch in case you have any questions for the new ownership: Greg Bertch gbertch@mrsinvestments.com Phone: 206-909-3217 MRS Investments business address: 8201164th Ave NE, Ste 200 Redmond WA 98052 Feel free to call me as well with anything you may need ... Thank you ... ***PLEASE NOTE OUR NEW ADDRESS*** Murphy McCullough Sr. Development Manager Tarragon 600 Stewart Street, Suite 1920 Seattle, WA 98101 206-233-9600 P 206·233-0260 f 206-579-6287 C 1 Check Requ, · for Non Vendor Refund or "mbursement This form is used only one time vendors. Please contact Ac, ts Payable if you have any questions regarding one time vendors. Check will be included in the next scheduled AJP check run and mailed or released after Council approval. Check Request Info: Date of request: ! 2 -Is -z.oto !';s" outJ.U,tl (_JJ µt,,,, U)/fQ(o-/7;2, Requestor's name: Requestor 's department/division: Request or's ext. #: /.-aµn:en N/wft;; Mail address for check: Gm -s-1-tv.xv+ Je.a,(;tl e, I tJA Check amount: Stre&f J-vJ..k ?/f/0( A Account number(s) to charge: Amount per account #: q ;;Li qq:;. 72- Reason for refand or reimbursement: • cJ/V~e of pmper!:) Ov)(ifAt,1/J. Sccuu-rfJ. 5?LJcf, i2efurvl: -1-o Jalt.,r 11, u~e, ~ cf.t;ooiuf tY nevJ b~tY Wtdif ree,<(,."Pt -Ji; COi -OO<J I 8 I 07 Check handling request: (YI¢ --fo abcv-& c,_c:{~-.ff ~ *A roval Si nature: Date: Requestor 's Department Administrator, 1v · n Director or designee: 0 * The person approving this check request must be an authorized signer. \\mrton\data\Piazz:a\DATA_C'.c:ntc:r\Fonns\Finance\2007_ Check Request for Non Vendor Rc:Und o~ Reimbursement (prim Q.lld fill in).doc Print and Fill hr Fomi, July 2007. -· ~ ------ • Printed: 04-25-2007 Payment Made: CITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA06-172 04/25/2007 03:41 PM Receipt Number: R0701857 Total Payment: 92,993.72 Payee: TARRAGON-CEDAR RIVER CORP PARK Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description Amount 3954 650.237.00.00.00DD Special Deposits 92,993.72 Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Pay1t1cnt Check 12002 92, 993.. 72 Account Balances Trans Account Code Description Balance Due ------------------------ 3021 303.000.00.345.85 3954 650.237.00.00.0000 5006 000.345.81.00.0002 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 5009 ooo.345.R1.oo.noo~ 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 5013 000.345.81.00.0010 5014 000.345.81.00.00ll 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 5020 D00.345.81.00.0017 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 5022 DD0.345.81.00.0019 5024 OD0.345.81.00.0024 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 5909 000.341.GD.00.0024 5941 000.341.50.DO.ODDD 5954 650.237.00.00.QOOO 5955 D00.05.519.90.42.1 5998 000.231.70.0D.OOOO Park Mitigation Fee Special Deposi t.s Annexation Fees Appeals/Waivers Binding Site/short Plat Co~diti~~~! D8c r~cs Environmental ~eview Prelim/Tentative Plat Final Plat PU1J Grading & Filling Pees Lot Line Adjustment Mobile Home Parks Rezone Routine Vegetation Mgrr,t Shoreline Subst Dev Site Plan Approval Temp Use or Fence Rev'.ew Variance Fees Conditional Approval Fee Comprehensive Plan Amend Booklets/EIS/Copies Maps (Taxabl el Special Deposits Postage Tax .00 . 00 . DO .DO .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 SO'tl0:)3"l::I c1noA l;!Q~ NIV13l;! GNVH:JV130 3SV3ld c.l"E661:6 oo· "{.L. E661:6 <l'v'lO.L I 'i;':OOZL "l::13al'lnN I LO-sz:-v j103H:;> 3!VO ;:l::);!['l_::;> Llllli \.'/, .,S<L 'll" E66Z:6 oo· U. E661:6 A~a~ns JO ~UTIOWB 11rld Lo·se::·vo Lo-se::-v 30N'il1'o'8 NOl!::>n030 '· r ... lNnO!."N 3010/\NI iJ.,:, NOl!dl);!OS30:r.'' ·1;;,[,·i\/)ON.'3:IHJ/\Ni '.:):·i-' //.;'1./(i:1.L~~:'i,}({ii, uo~ua~ ;o A~1~ oosir~ :J77 'f.J11tf a1v.1od.JOJ .J;M.!H .ivpa:J-'uofl1JJ.JV,L ------------- SPECIAL DEPOSIT TRANSMITTAL PAYEE: ·rr'r,,;n·(PJo . ...--R,,"1..--(nr-().'T>,,r-t' u.( REFUNDING ADDRESS: '/\• ·, /\·,,: (\)j[: ), , -h -i, :j, Y) '·11 I r>"'-/ ,, / CiTI: ·!·_( STATE: !:..::...:!:_ZIP:~ PROJECT NAME: iycJ(/-,r /'(,\fc,r Cl"irD. '"])(,-. ,--{'_ ADDRESS LOCATION: c'2 '.,1. ,'.)Cl L. l'1 c:( A ~'f!. .':)L,J PERMIT#; /. (_.\.AOL 1"7 .;t_ DEPT. CONTACT: J · I/ ~Dr I''-"\ \J Exrn: ·r.l. l 'l SPECIAL DEPOSIT CONDITIONS: '"!,-,_f-J·.Y."'.,, I fOr /.,)() ·i Ir,. (\r~ I C l. :,,· r,1,.,. t·,r··0 -~" ,. N• .. 1 t 1 C) l-<:l(w..-"'1-""-"""'""'1..__-0II..,,.-..... .,... .... " ......... _ _.. WHITE:AND YELLOW TO FINANCE. RETAIN PlNX FOR PBPW RECOROS DATE: A /;i,; /D') RECEIPT#: /Jn7n/5(l~r1 FINANCE REC. #: AMOUNT: $ ti'}, Ci"'fC"'b"'""', """}",__---c(;,cg---,i'e ""'1°")--cO--,-{)"")-- WO#: FUNCTION#: ----- TYPE OF DEPOSIT: BUILDING 0 90 DAY TeMPORARY OCCUPANCY PERMIT 0 LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE D S!GN DEPOSIT 0 STREET CLEANING PUBLIC WORKS CJPW CONSTRUCTION PERMIT PROPERTY SERVICES Cl LATE COMER FEE {To BE RETURNED TO LC$ HOt.OER) Cl STv'AC (APPRAISAL FEE DUE APPRAISER) BOARD .OF PUBLIC WORKS 0 BPWDEF (BPW DEFFERAL) (Y'/0# 89150 FN# 5190 TRANS CODE #7054) _ 'FOTHER: ____________ _ ·.~,' .L'"' ·,~·--••~~ ... ,.'.• •• ·--.~~_:._,.;,..~:;-'.""' ·,. '', •:.:......:......:..~ .. ~:s ... ;,,.~~' ', ·, ' .' ~ ,' ·, '_ .. , -> Alt Mffc~~ ~pr; -t~{, Ni)A1A-' ( (1,tJv1 ( f: U/,A,00-(72.. **************************************** CITY OF RENTON 1055 S GRADY WAY RENTON, WA 98057 425-430-6850 **************************************** Reg# #/Rcpt#: 001-00018107 [ DH J Accounting Date: 1led, Dec 15, 2010 Date/Time: Wed, Dec 15, 2010 11 :05 AM **************************************** RENTON CEDAR RIVER PARK REF#: FEE AMOUNT: $92,993.72 RECEIPT TOTAL = $92,993.72 **************************************** Payment Data: Pmt# :1 Payer: OLD REPUBLIC TITLE/ESCROW Method: CK Ref#: 2600020119 AMOUNT = $92,993.72 **************************************** RECEIPT SUMMARY **************************************** TOTAL TENDERED = $92,993.72 RECEIPT TOTAL = $92,993.72 CHANGE DUE = $0.00 **************************************** HAVE A NICE DAY! **************************************** 2600020119 OLD REPUBLIC TITLE, LTD. ESCROW TRUST ACCOUITT 52 -26 ESCROW NO. 5226005504-MY 92,993.7 SELLER/BUYER: Tarragon-Cedar River Corporate Park LLC/Renton Cedar River Park, LLC PROPERTY: 2200 Lind Avenue SW, Renton, Washington 98057 PAYMENT FOR Wetlands Deposit CHECK TOTAL THE ATTACHED CHECK JS IN PAYMENT OF ITEMS DESCRIBED ABOVE. !F NOT CORRECT PLEASE NOTIFY U.:i PROMPTlY. NO RECEJPT DESIRED. DETACH HERE RETAIN THIS STATEMENT DETACH HERE 2600020119 92,993.72 1 -• ~ .DO NOT ACCEPT THIS CHECK IF· "OLD REPUBLIC".! L:OGOS DO NOT~PJ!EAR-lN THE BACKGROUND. SEE' REVERSE SIDE FOR MORE SAFETY F.:EATURES. ,·~, ··J.::~t" OLD REPUBLIC._. TITLE.&ESCROW;,LTD. •? .,',, ~ ·. ;;:· ,~-·- Washindtoil.:.cDmmercial 22D1 5tt-. Avenue, Suite 12µ. Seattle, WA 98121 .; , · -:/ \) (~~-6) 4'11-1955 PAY iTO Ninety Two Thousand Nine Hundred Ninety Three and 72/100 DOLLARS TliE City of Renton _ORDER OF .,:,. US Bank 142D 5TH Avenue Se.attlii)NA 98101 '·'./.:-,,,.;-. -·:· 2600Q20i19., i9-10/125~,"i; ___c··ccR""~e""'·i:.ccr~c_c,bcc' e--r __ 14-"'""l-""_0-"1D"":c.:.,}_,, _ f 0.-f $92,993.72 vom~ii.-120 DAYS -INVAllD ovER $1,000,000 .' .. ' ESCROW TRUST ACCOUNT 52 • 26 .. A __ ·,, L!J Denis Law Mayor October 9, 2009 Charlie Foushee Tarragon Development 1000 2°' Ave Ste #3200 Seattle, WA 98104 Department of Community & Economic Development Subject: Receipt of First Annual Wetland Maintenance and Monitoring Report Cedar River Corporate Park City of Renton File LUA06-172 Dear Mr. Wyman: I received the first annual Maintenance and Monitoring report for the Cedar River Corporate Park mitigation project on October 7, 2009. The project appears to be meeting its established performance standards and is considered in compliance. Two copies of your next scheduled maintenance and monitoring report are due to the city by December 30, 2010. If you have any questions, please contact me at (425) 430-7219. Sincerely, 1~~ Current Planning Division cc: City of Renton File No. LUA06-162 Celeste Botha, Wetland Permitting Services Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov c· ityof Pta,-,,r Fient ir,g D· . On 11/JSior, Der~ 7 l(J{jy YEAR 2 FALL /f/l~ BUFFER ENHANCEMENT MONITORJNG REPORT ©f$f 'wJ$/fJJ CEDAR R.IVER CORPORA TEP ARK PRIT:IRFD FOR: C.I IAIUIC FOU5HF.E f.lR R.ICO"\J DEVELOPMENT 1000 SCC,,ND AVFNUF Sur11. 3200 SLITTU, WA 98104 (206) 233-9600 i'RFP.IRED BY: l FUoTL BOTHA ~ WED A.NP lJiMI~ ffBY'CES Zoi5 South Norman Street Seattle, Wuh~ 9"1+4 wpo@i.p.co,n Sr-l'Tl:\mrn. 30, 2009 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMA~ Y The Cedar River Corporate Park site is located east of Lind Avenue SW, as shown in Figure 1, at 2200 Lind Avenue SW (Parcel 3340400285). A Wetland Buffer Mitigation Plan, dated April 16, 2007, was prepared by WPS. The plan was approved by the City of Renton and implementation was completed on February 13, 2008. FIGURF 1: VICINITI' MAP This report presents a summary of enhancement measures, goals, a description of the approved and actual monitoring protocol, performance standards, results of the Year 2 Fall monitoring effort obtained on August 17 and September 29, 2009, and includes tables showing percent cover and survivorship, photographs corresponding to those in the Year 1 reports, as well as recommendations for maintaining mitigation goals. The report also addresses each of the comments relative to "monitoring report comments" provided by OTAK in their letter to the city entitled, "Review of Year 1 Winter Cedar River Corporate Park Buffer Enhancement Monitoring Report'1 , dated June 18, 2009. The "recommended actions" section was addressed during the maintenance visit but many of these issues persist and must be addressed again as soon as possible. 2. MITIGATION GO.>\LS & 0BJIC I IVI ~ The goal of the mitigation plan was to compensate for permanent impacts resulting from biofiltration swales and for temporary impacts due to clearing and placement of additional fill material in wetland buffers. A total of 453 shrubs and 99 trees were specified within the 11,358 square foot temporary buffer impacts area. 704 hardy ground covers were also planted per the planting plan. In addition, 400 conifer tree seedlings were planted within the undisturbed buffer; per the approved plan, no monitoring of the seedling tree plantings within the undisturbed buffer area has been or will be performed. 3. PLR.FOR./vt'\NCF ST ANDA~l )~ Performance standards are shown below in Table 1; explanations for elements of the Performance Standards are provided below. 2 TABLE 1: PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Criterion Year 2 Year 3 Native plant cover {%) {includes herbaceous) 1 year 20 -30 after installation 30-70 Native woody plant cover (%} (for forested or scrub-20 -30 i 40-60 shrub areas) 1 year after installation Non-native, invasive plant cover(%) Plant survivorship Species diversity 3./ S!'EC/£5 DIVERSITY (~ee notes below) (see notes below) (sec notes below) Year 4 Year 5 70-90 100 60-80 80-85 The following minimum standards apply to species diversity of native plants, including both planted and volunteer species, within the various strata: • trees= 4 species, at least 1 of which must be coniferous • shrubs= 5 species • ground cover= 2 species 3.2 f'LANT SUR V/VOR:,H/P 100% survivorship was guaranteed by the landscaping contractor for the first year after installation; thereafter no survivorship standard was established. The intention to drop the survivorship standard after Year 1 was presented in each of the four Year 1 quarterly reports. As noted, survivorship is not a viable long-term determinant of success. However, in response to the OTAK letter dated June 18, 2009, WPS monitored survivorship again and used the 80% standard for Year 2. However, we propose to discontinue of the survivorship standard beginning in 2010. As noted above, the success of the plantings together with existing mature trees and volunteer native species throughout the majority of the site are likely to create attrition, particularly of the smaller and less shade tolerant species due to excessive shade. We propose to depend on the cover standard for all future monitoring. 3.JCONTROL OF NOXIOUS& INV!\S/IESrn-1L, Noxious weeds {identified on state noxious weeds lists) including giant and Japanese knotweeds (Polygonum sachalinense, P. cuspidotum) must be entirely and properly eliminated, and disposed of, from the site prior to installation, and throughout the monitoring period. Reed canarygrass (Phaloris arundinaceoe), Scot's broom (Cytisus scoparius), English ivy (Hedera helix), creeping buttercup (Ranuncu/us repens), and Himalayan dnd evergreen blackberries (Rubus armeniacus, R. laciniatus), may not exceed 10% total cover per species (i.e., up to 10% cover of each species may be allowed) throughout the monitoring period up to a total of no greater than 20% cover from invasive species. 3. 4 FENCc.5' AND StCN, Fences and signs will be inspected during the maintenance visits and must be in good repair. 4. /v\CJNITOR.ING PR_OTOCOL Although the mitigation plan indicated that five monitoring stations would be established, survivorship was evaluated through a full-plant count during each quarter of Year 1; survivorship was no longer to be assessed 3 beginning with the current monitoring period. Nevertheless, to address a comment from OTAK, a full-plant count was conducted again on September 29, 2009. To evaluate cover, four permanent line-intercept transects totaling 325 linear feet were established and marked in the field with flagging and metal tags, as shown in Figure 2. Due to their length and representative locations, four transects were considered adequate to evaluate cover. A tape was stretched between randomly-selected points and cover of each species encountered along the tape was noted. Species diversity was determined during survivorship monitoring. Native volunteer species were included in the diversity numbers. NOTE: PLANTS LOCATED ON DETAIL SHEETS S • 1 ntROUGH 5 ·6,ANOE. t THROUGH E .J ARE PLANTED WITHIN THE ENHANCEMENT AREA LOCATED ADJACEHTTOTHEINDICATeD PARl( ... GSTALL. PLANTS LOCATED ON SHEETS N -1 THROUGH N • 4 ARE LOCATED IN THE APPROXNATE ORDER SHOWN. Overviaw As-8uilt and Monitoring Map _..! CEDARRM:RCORPORATEPARK FIGURE 2: LOCATIONS OF MONITORING TRANSECTS The monitoring schedule is reproduced below in Table 2. Year 1 2 -5 TABLE 2: MONITORING & MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE Maintenance Visits Between January 1 and March 1 AND Between April 1 and June 1 AND Between July 1 and September 30 Between October 15 and December 30 Between April 1 and June 1 AND Between July 1 and September 30 Monitoring Between January 1 and March 1 AND Between April 1 and June 1 ANO Between July 1 and September 30 Between October 15 and December 30 Between September 1 and October 15 4 Report due March 30 June 30 October 30 January 31 December 30 5. MONITORING !lFSLIL TS The Year 2 Fall monitoring event occurred on August 17 and September 29, 2009. Photographs were taken on August 17 of the entire enhancement area from the same locations as in previous monitoring reports. Photographs are provided in Appendix 1. A summary of cover monitoring results is shown in Table 3. TABLE 3: (OVER MONITORING RESULTS SUMMARY TABLE Transect Installed Plants Trees Length of transect: Total trees· 77.6 % cover along transect 27% 2 94 % cover along transect 6% 3 101 % cover along transect 11% Acer macrophyllum j Big-leaf maple 0% ! 0% ! 0% 1-A_in_u_s_ru_b_r:..o _____ l-'-R.::e.::d..:•:.:ld:.:ec.r _______ .l-j -~2:..3-·_:x-.::.~~:~=-0%~~:·: __ :i 3% 1 ... 1-P--'ru __ nc.u:..s_v_irg=-'.c".::ia.cn.::a ___ J--'BC:itc.te:::r_:c:::h.::e:..:rry.,_ _____ j_ __ 2_%_, --+---·-3% ___ J----3%------1 _ f-'-Ps:::e:.:uc:d..:o.::ts.::ul'-g:.o.::m:..:e:::n::.z,c:·e:::si'-i -+-'D:::o:::u,ag:::l•..:s .::fi:._r ______ f-1 _ _:2:::o/c:., --+ ·--_ --~~-------~ .... Rhamnus purshiana Cascara ! 0% 1% 1 1% I 1-T-hu_i_a_p_li_coc_t_a ____ -+-'W-'-e'-,",e-,'-n-,-e-d-,-ed-,-,----ir 0% "0% ____ "'"1 0% I Shrubs Total shrubs· 34% 0 29% . 611< ' Acer circinatum ! vine maple 0% I 3% , 0% ' ' -----· -- Berberis oquifolium ! tall Oregon grape i 1% I 1% 0% ! -- Crataegus douglasii ! Douglas hawthorn i 0% I 0% I 0% ! --·-- ! Indian plum ' o% I t Oemleria cerasiformis 7% 0% ' ' -3%1 ---- Ribes sanguineum red-flowering currant ! 2% I 2% : I --I i -- Roso nutkana Nootka rose ' 9% 4% 1% ·-- Rubus parvifforus Thimbleberry 0% 1% 0% ------··- Sambucus racemosa red elderberry 0% 0% 0% Spiraea douglassii Douglas spirea 9% 9% 3% -------- Symphoricarpos a/bus snowberry 5% 2% 0% Groundcovers Total e:rollndcovers: 5% 2% 0% Berberis nervosa short Oregon grape 0% 0% 0% -- Gaultheria sha!lon Deer fern 4% 1% 0% -·-·-------------- ____ ,, _______ ---- Blechnum spicant salal 1% 1% 0% -· ---- Pofystichum munitum western sword fern 0% 9% 0% lnvasives Total invasives· 0% 0% 0% Cirsium vulgaris Bull thistle 0% 0% 0% - Equisetum arvense Horsetail 0% 0% 0% • i Lotus cornicufotus Birdsfoot trefoil 0% i 0% ' 0% Rubus armeniacus ! Himalavan blackberry . 0% i 0% ' 0% Volunteer native _T,:i · I_ \l'ObJ.nteer natives: 0% 0% 0% Populus ba!samifera Black cottonwood 0% 0% 0% Salix spp. Willow 0% 0% 0% fota1 nat1Ve.wood'.i: Totaf native: 4 52.5 % cover along transect 15% 325.1 % cover overall 14% ! __ 0% 6% - 2% ...... 0% 9% 6% 0% 0% 0% . ---- 2% 1% 0% 15% 0 171" 0 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 2% 0% 2% . ·----··-- 4% 4% --------- 4% 0% .................... ---------- 0% 0% ...... --·---·····---·----- 2% 5% ----·-----. 3% 2% 3% 2% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 3% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% -----·--- 0% 0% --- 0% I 0% 0% i 0% 3% 0% 3% 0% " ....... ] ___________ 0% 0% 32% 34% As can be seen in Table 3, the project meets lhe Year 2 cover standards for both installed native plant cover and invasive species cover overall, but cover within Transect 2 representing the north planting area shown in photos 15 through 17 (Appendix 1) is substandard. Please note that the cover data includes installed plants and young volunteers only and does not include cover from existing mature trees. These trees along the south and east areas 5 represented by Transects 1 and 2, are providing an additional approximately 30% cover. The combination of installed and existing canopy will likely affect survivorship over time due to excessive shade. Table 4 presents the survivorship data. The site continues to exceed the survivorship standard. TABLE 4: SURVIVORSHIP DATA YEAR 2 FALL Plant Symbol Quantity Quantity % Survivorship Specified Located Trees Acer macrophy//um Big-leaf maple BLM 0 11 100.00% Afnus rubra Red alder RA 15 •'Q 17 113.33% Prunus virginiano bitter cherry BC 41 37 90.24% Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas fir DF 20 18 90.00% Rhomnus purshiana cascara C 23 28 121.74% Thuja pficata Western red cedar WRC 0 5 100.00% Shrubs Acer circinotum vine maple VM 23 22 95.65% Berberis oquifolium tall Oregon grape TOG 68 57 83.82% Crataegus doug/asii Douglas hawthorn DH 0 31 100.00% Oemleria cerasiformis Indian plum IP 68 69 101.47% Ribes sanguineum red-flowering currant RFC 45 29 64.44% Rosa nutkana Nootka rose NR 68 107 157.35% Rubus parviflorus Thimbleberry TB 0 33 100.00% Sambucus racemoso red elderberry RE 68 0 0.00% Spiraea douglassii Douglas spirea OS 68 77 113.24% Symphoricarpos a/bus snowberry SN 45 48 106.67% Groundcovers Berberis nervosa short Oregon grape OG 273 48 17.58% 8/echnum spicant* Deer fern FD 0 169 100.00% Gauftheria shailon sa!al s 227 18 7.93% Po/ystichum munitum western sword fern SF 204 162 79.41% 204 331 162.25% Total Ferns: 1256 986 112.82% Grand Total: Table 5 presents a summary of Year 2 monitoring results. TABLE 5: MONITORING RESULTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE STANDARDS: YEAR 2 -FALL 2009 Criterion Native plant cover(%) (includes groundcover) Native woody plant cover (%) Non-native, invasive plant cover(%}: Noxious weeds Reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundiriacrne,\ Scot's broom {Cytisus scoparius) English ivy (Hedero helix) Creeping buttercup (Ronunculus re pens) 6 Standard Actual 20 · 30% 34% 20-30% 32% 0% 0% 10% 0% 10% 0% 10% 0% 10% 0% Himalayan blackberry {Rubus procerus) 10% 0% Evergreen blackberry {R. /aciniotw,) 10% 0% Plant survivorship 80% 112.82% Species diversity Trees {all planted species plus cottonwood) 4 7 Shrubs (all planted species plus willow and dogwood) 8 12 Ground covers (all planted species plus numerous volunteers) 3 >6 Fences & Signs Good Good Besides formal monitoring, observations were noted regarding problem areas. These observations are discussed in the Analysis of Results section below. 6. /'\Ni\L YSIS LJf R. LSUl. rs Although the results presented in Table 3 through Table 5 indicate that the site exceeds all standards for Year 2, some issues remain to be resolved pertaining to the north planting areas adjacent to rain gardens, which have consistently underperformed relative to the south and east planting areas and despite repeated efforts to replant and irrigate, continue to do so. The July 2009 drought was responsible for killing many plants that are exposed to full afternoon sun, particularly those planted in spring th;it did not have the winter months to become established. As noted by OTAK in their June 18 letter, several noxious weeds, particularly birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus), tansy (Tanasetum vu/gore), butterfly bush (Buddleia davidii), thistles (Cirsium arvense and vulgare) and Himalayan blackberry (Rubus ormeniacus) are becoming ubiquitous throughout the rain gardens and these are expected to spread into the adjacent north planting area. Besides this north planting area, thistles and blackberries are making a comeback in the south and east planting areas since the spring maintenance visit and although not reflected in the cover monitoring results are becoming serious threats, particularly to groundcovers. Areas with populations requiring immediate attention are located as shown in Table 6; sheet numbers refer to Figure 2. As noted by OTAK, bittersweet nightshade is also present {though scattered and thus harder to locate) and must be addressed immediately as it becomes established quickly. Sheet Number E-1 E-2 S-2 S-3 N-1-N-2 N-3 TABLE 6: LOCATIONS OF SIGNIFICANT INVAS!VE SPECIES POPULATIONS Species Thistles Thistles Blackberries and thistles Thistles and horsetail Location Center of Sheet E-1 South end of Sheet E-2 East side of Sheet 5-2 -.. -"""""''·-····-,-···------+------------- East side of S-3 -----------------+-~~----,------ Birdsfoot trefoil, tansy, butterfly bush, thistles and Inside the raingardens Himalayan blackberry Thistles West side of N-3 7. R_ECDMMLND.ATIONS Since the Year 3 cover standard goes up to between 30 and 70%, performance in the north planting area represented by Transect 3 will likely determine success or failure to meet the Year 3 cover standard. Therefore, 7 close attention should be paid to this area through the summer months of 2010. Irrigation of all areas should be discontinued with the exception of this north planting area and the area south of the detention pond (Sheet E-3). We continue to recommend strict adherence to the maintenance schedule provided in Section 4. Maintenance shall consist of removing weeds, repairing and replacing damaged fences and buffer signage, and refreshing mulch where needed. As noted by OTAK, weeds should be disposed of properly. 8. R FPOR_T Lilv\lTA Tl\..lNS The information contained herein is, to our knowledge, correct and accurate. We are not responsible for the accuracy of information provided by others. Within the limitations of schedule, budget, and scope-of-work, we warrant that this study was conducted in accordance with generally accepted environmental science practices, including the technical guidelines and criteria in effect at the time of this study. The results and conclusions of this report represent the authors' best professional judgment based upon information provided by the project proponent and information obtained during the course of this study. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. Signed: Celeste Botha 8 APPENDIX 1: MONITOR.ING PHOTOGRAPHS /\l!CLI> I 17, 2009 Photo 1 SA East (August 17, 2009) Photo 4: SC East .... i:' '~ . i",. -~. ~,-1·-~q,_ ~I,. ,-(, :{/~:~' :ft\.'~ i.ttj)' t-. ' . ' ,. Pnoto 2 SA West Photo J: SB East Photo '-i· SD East Photo 6: SE East • Photo 7: Sf East Photo 8: SG East Photo 9· SX West Photo 10: SX North Photo 11: EA North Photo 12: rn North Photo 13: Detention Pond looking east Photo 14: Detention Pond looking north Photo 15: Raingarden looking west Photo 16: Getween raingardens Photo 17: West ralngardE'n looking west NOTE: Monitoring Photographs are Indexed to the features identified here. ~ Raingardens ~· .,,.--' ,-' . . ,, -· A' ~0~ .. <···: ... ··· [; .. , .• . , . ., ..... i,• .. . . . , •. , • ·.:.? 0-u \( -·· ----u-· -·-·rr----·u --·-~~-· ·r'· /> 'i ,~__) ' _.) /_,. i"_ ,. ! -· /~..J < ·1 r-, C-1 . . . n ,·•·L . IL . ('\ ~I ~ ·-· ' , ' lr--,. '\ C /'! ~ -g r~·---~-" I Q) 0 ,. /! m ~ ~! _JI O I· .~ f i L IW;;. '• j.'' I >1~~,:sp c~~\ C r" ll f .... l "a,'. ,___r-1.1 I ·-• , I =• q:; ,., I I ;;:g , . r·' " r, ' ~~·v r---------.:cc==;;j J q.-., .. , r ;; ,l ...... ,· ~~ ·•·• ! ' Ct EB ~ ' 'F;,c'-" " . • I"-. EA 0 c/ Cl:_ ...s; \f:Jj cL_-=d) CJ· 1 ; LJ ·,. ·, ,- r. ··. ;1' '~~~'j""""'Ff """"rl\; ~ ........ .; ....... ~---- • • -1 t I { ! sx SA SB SC SD SE SF SG Index Sheet for Monitoring Photographs ~,!~!;:,·CEDAR RIVER CORPORATE PARK Denis Law Mayor September 2, 2009 Charlie Foushee Tarragon Development 1000 2'' Ave Ste 113200 Seattle, WA 98104 Department of Community & Economic Development Subject: Receipt of Fourth Quarter Monitoring Report Cedar River Corporate Park City of Renton File LUA06-172 Dear Mr. Foushee: I received the letter from Wetland Permitting Services (dated July 30, 2009) in response to the recommendations provided by Otak in the memo dated June 18, 2009. This letter along with your 4th quarter report fulfills your obligation for quarterly monitoring for the first year; you are now required to monitor on a yearly basis for a minimum of four more years. The area must be successfully monitored and maintained for a minimum of five years to assure the success of the wetland mitigation project. All recommendations, on pages 3 and 4 (4.a-d) of the Otak memorandum, for future monitoring reports; shall be followed. The 1" Annual monitoring report should include a follow up statement that the recommended actions have been completed (specifically 5.c-f). As a reminder, if at any time in the next four years the mitigation project does not meet the established performance standards, the monitoring period will be put on hold until compliance is achieved. Subsequently, the monitoring timeframe will be restarted and you will once again be required to provide quarterly reports for the first year and annual reports thereafter (for a minimum of five years). If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. I look forward to receiving your first annual report maintenance and monitoring report on December 30, 2009. j~- Rocale Timmons, Planner Current Planning Division cc: City of Renton File No. LUA06-162 Celeste Botha, Wetland Permitting Services Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov 0 Dellneacion 0 Reconn.a.i.88ance evaluati.on11, 0 Permit: aHistance and agency coordination 0 Profeesi.onal report preparation 0 Impact analy11is and sequenclng July 30, 2009 Roca le Timmons Associate Planner City of Renton Development Services 1055 5. Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 WETI.AND PERMITTING SERVICES Plume: (2oh) ;,:?Sf775 Fax, (:1o6) JZS--7719 Co/'tl: (Z<n) 2.f<>-2411 v. p;;@.lisp.com RE: Cedar River Corporate Park project (LUA 06-172) Buffer restoration and enhancement maintenance inspection Dear Rocale: Mltigati.un planning and monltoring O Linear projec:ts (roads, power and gas lines) 0 Environmental compllance during c:::onetruction 0 Peer revlew and pem1it conditioning 0 Wetland inventorles 0 City of Renton Planning Division JUL 3 0 I009 As required, a maintenance visit of the buffer restoration and enhancement was conducted on July 26, 2009. This letter is to confirm that the applicant, Tarragon LLC, has implemented the recommendations of the maintenance recommendations listed in the letter from OTAK dated June 18, 2009. Blackberries, thistles and other listed invasive species have been entirely removed from the restoration and enhancement areas and immediately adjacent areas; sweet clover has been left in the rain garden, as recommended. Transects will be established to monitor percent cover during the fall monitoring event. The project appears to be on-target to accomplish Year 2 performance standards and I am very pleased with the survivorship of conifers in the non-impact areas of the buffer (which are not included in the monitoring effort), as well. Thank you for the opportunity to provide you with this information. Please do not hesitate to call with questions or concerns. Sincerely, Celeste Botha CC: Charlie Foushee, Tarragon LLC U>~5 Smll·h Norm•n Srr-eet s,-,1ttl.,, Washington <)844 I July 6, 2009 Denis Law Mayor Charlie Foushee Tarragon Development 1000 2"' Ave Ste #3200 Seattle, WA 98104 [J .J\."' ....... .,..~..,.._,,, Department of Community & Economic Development Subject: Receipt of Fourth Quarterly Maintenance and Monitoring Report Cedar River Corporate Park City of Renton File LUA06-172 Dear Mr. Foushee: I received the forth quarter maintenance and monitoring report for Cedar River Corporate Park Wetland Mitigation project from Wetland Permitting Services on April 16, 2009. Because this was the final quarterly monitoring report; the report was sent to a third party, Otak, for review. Based on a site assessment; Otak provided a memorandum (dated June 18, 2009) with comments on the condition of the mitigation areas, a review of the 4th Quarterly Monitoring Report, and recommended actions for the mitigation areas to help ensure success of the mitigation project. All recommendations, on pages 3 and 4 (4.a-d) of the attached memorandum, for future monitoring reports; shall be followed. Necessary measures, as recommended on pages 4 and 5 of the attached memorandum, need to be completed to secure the survival of the plantings. The 1" Annual monitoring report should include a follow up statement that the recommended actions have been completed (specifically 5.c-f). However, before your obligation for the 4th Quarter report can be fulfilled; your biologist will need to provide a statement that Recommendations 5.a and b, have been performed. Specifically: inspection of the irrigation system and remove stakes/guy wires. Please submit two copies of the statement to my attention no later than July 31, 2009. Please contact me with any questions (425) 430-7219. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, j~"" Planning Division cc: City of Renton File No. LUAOG-162 Celeste Botha, Wetland Permittlng Services Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov I Memorandum 10230 }\.,Tl~ PtJints D,ive SHifr 400 KJrkland, I/YA 9803) Phm (475) 8224446 J'tl.Y (4:'5) 8]7-9577 To: From: Copies: Date: Subject: Project No.: Roc:tlc Timmons, J\ssociatc Planner, City of Renton Stephanie Smith, Wetland Biologist Suzanne Anderson, Senior \\/etland Ecologist J unc 18, 2009 Review of Year 1 Winter Cedar River Corporate Park J)uffcr Enhancernent ~v1onitoring Report 31176A As requested by the City of Renton, Otak staff is rroviding third party review of the monitoring efforts at the Cedar River Corporate Park. Otak staff conducted a site visit on June 11, 2009. Based on that site assessment, this technical rncmoranJum provides comments on the condition of the mitigation areas, as well as a review of the -Ith Quarrerly tlfonitoring Report by \Vetland Permitting Services (\'vl'S). The last section of this mcmor:cn<lum includes recommen<led actions for the mitigation areas to help ensure success of the niiLiµ-ation project. The follo\ving document \Vas reviewed and is referenced in this 1ne1norandurn: • Year 1 \'(_.inter Buffer Enhancement \[onitoring Report by Wetland Permilling Services dated , \pril 1-l, 2009 (referred to as the 4"· Q11,11-Jrr reporl) I. Introduction The Cedar River Corporate Park is located at 2200 Lind 1\venue S\V in the City of Renton. It is bordered to the north by an undeveloped p:1rcd, 10 the south by utility corridor and an abandoned right-of-way, to the \vest by Lind Avenue S\\'·, :1nJ to the cast by a con1mcrcial development. Wetlands surround the Cedar River Corporotc Park on tbe north, east, and west si<lcs. No wetland impacts occurred during the development uf the office park; ho\vever, there \Vere temporary and pennancnt impacts to the \Vetland buffer. ;\s compensatory mitigation, the wetland buffers were enhanced along the entire south side of rhc dcnlopment and the majority of 1he north and east sides of the development. The buildings arc loctttd in the center of the parcel, with parking located around the rerimeter. The parking areas arc separated from the buffer enhancement areas by planting scrips and a split-rail fence. The buffer enhancement areas are located outside of the split- rail fence, sloping down towards the wetlands, and they were originally planted "~th a variety of native species (approximately 1250 trees, shrubs, woody groundcovers, and ferns). Additional enhancement plantings are located within undisturbed portions of the wetland buffers. 1\pproximately 400 conifers [300 Douglas iirs (1\mdotsuga menziesi,) and 100 western re<l cc<lars K: \project \31400\314 7(i:\ \Report~ \31476:\ CcdarRi,·erCorpPark Rn· ,n,·.,!1 )( ' Rocafe Timmons, Associate Planner, Cit;, of Renton Cedar River Corporate Park 1'v1011itori11g Report l(minJ Page 2 June 18, 2009 (Thi!JCI p!il.'ala)] were planted amongst existing ~hrubs and trees to cornpensate for permanent impacts due to construction of the bioswale and raingardcns "'~thin the buffer. The approved mitigation plan states there are no performance standards or required monitoring for the 400 conifers planted in the undisturbed buffer. The monitored mitigation area is divided into three sections. In this 1ncmorandum, the buffer enhancement areas are referred to as thL North, East, and South Sections. Overall, the 4's Quarter Report is very complete. It includes numerous, helpful site maps; detailed planting sheets; extensive data summary tables_: and well-labeled photos. 2. Performance Standards: Generally speaking, we concur with the conclusions of the 4'" Quarter Monitoring Report that rhe plantings in the Cedar River Corporate !'ark buffer enhancement area arc satisfying the Performance Standards specified 111 the .i'vlitigation Plan a:-; follows: I a. 10-20 percent native plant cover dunng Y car 1. I b. 10-20 percent native woody plant con:r for forested or scrub-shrub areas. 2. Non-native invasive plant cover 1nay not cxcec<l 10'Yo total cm.-cr p<.:r species throughout lhe rnomtoring period up to a total of no greater than 20°/o cover frorn invasive species. 3. 100% plant survivorship is guaranteed b1 the landscaping contractor for the first vear airer installation. 4. Species diversity standards state that there \\'iU be 4 tree species ( one of which will be coniferous), 5 shrub species, and 2 ground cover species. 5. There is no performance standard for the conifers planted in the undisturbed buffer. 3. Site Assessment Comments 3.a. O,·erall, the mitigation area looks good and the installed woody plants generally appear to be healthy and thriving, especially in the cast and south sections where they are shaded by adjacent forested communities. f fowc\'Cr, some of the Douglas hawthorn (Cratmgus dougfasi1) saplings locatcJ in the south section appear stresscJ -son1e appear to have been recently knocked over by wind. 3.b. Mulch had recently been applied to the entire mitigation area. 3.c. Additional (approximately 109) plants were ins tailed to replace those that died during the first year, per the contractor's one-year \Varranty. The tnajority of these plants \.Vere installed along the North section where morrahtv had been high. The majority of the newly installed plants also appear to be healthy and thri,·ing. Additional installed species include big-leaf maple (Acermacrophyi/11m), red alclcr (.·i/1111s mbra), cascara (Rhamn11spurshia11a), Douglas hawthorn, Nootka rose (Rosa nutkmw), and thimbleberry (Rub11s parviflorus). K;\project\314D0\31476:\ \Report~\ 11476;\ C.:cdarl-ln:erCorpPark Rn 1c\,·.d, ,c Rocalc Titnmons, Associate Planne~ Ci(v of Renton Cedar River Corporate Park Alonitoring Reporl IZC!1ii:u; Page 3 ]1111, 18, 200 9 3.d. ,-\!though control of non-native irn asi\'C species generally appears to be keeping aerial cover below the Performance Standard threshold of ten percent, invasives are becoming established in some areas. The non-natiYc in...-asive species should be removed as soon as they are apparent to ensure achie\Tmcnt of the 5 Year Performance Standard. Non-native species that \Ve observed that must be controlled include: + Hin1alayan blackbtrry (Ru.bus ,m110/UhHr',: located in patches throughout the mitigation area. Much of the blackberry in the mnigation area is actually rooted outside of the mitigation area} but it is rapidly gro\"1.1ng into the planting areas and is likely to smother installed vegetation. + thistles (Cir:ci11m .r;,.): mostly imh,·idml plants at this time, however. there are some larger patches of thistle in the North and Last sections, as \veil as a large patch in section S-2. • bitters\vect nightshade (So/a,wm du/r,·c11J1rmi1: there arc t\vo areas ,.vith bitters\-veet nightshade located in S-1 and N-l + com111on tansy (Tanacetum vul!'ifl't' T,.,: located in the eastern section of N-4. 3.e. Another non-native species found in large quantities in the mitigation area is white sweet- clover (Meiilotus albu.1). It is primarily growing in the bioswalcs located north of the north parking lot. I-lo'\vever, re111oval is not necessary at this ti.int, since white S\-veet-clover is not likely to compete with the native ngcta1ion during the summer of 2009. Additionally, the white s\\'eet-clovcr is providing sh;Hic for the ne'\vly installed vegetation along the North section. 3.f. The fences and signage appeared to be in good repair. 3.g. The \v'etland Buffer ,\litigation Plan ind1ca1es that a minimum of five monitoring plots will be established in the field and designated wi[h permanent 1narkers. \Y/e <lid not observe any pcrrnanenr rnonitoring plots, nor Jue::; rhc monitoring report indicate that the monitoring is conducted using monitoring ploLs. lnstc;id, monitoring appears to be conducted by counting all of the installed plants, which tnay Jun.' been necessary for the first year to determine whether the rc~uired 100 percent of die installed plants survived. 4. Monitoring Report Comments In addition to the information currently pnwiclccl in the 4'" Quarter monitoring report, the follO\,~ng information should be included in future monitoring reports: 4.a. The majority of the Otak recommcnd:i11ons from the 3'd Quarter review were included in the 41 "-Quarter review. Continue to prm·idc this information during subsequent reviews. 4.b. ln the Year 2 monitoring report, pronde information regarding the methodology of how the Performance Standards for the mitigation area were assessed (percent cover by native species and invasives, species divcr\ity, etc.). Continuing to assess the entire mitigation area is fine; however, it is possible to establish permanent representative vegetation 111onitoring plots in each section of the mitigation area. The approved Mitigation Plan states that a K: \pm1n::t\J l4UO\.'.li 416:\ \H.epom, \31476,-\ Ct:JarR.1n:rCorpPark Rcv,cw.cl1"., Rocale Timn1onsJ Associate Planner} City of Renton Cedar River Corporate Park A!onitoring Reporl Rmm' Page 4 June 18, 2009 minimum of five monitoring plots will be established. A sufficient number of plots should be established so that approximatclv 25 percent of the installed plants (approximately 300) are counted) and each vegetation conununity in each nlltigation section is represented. This is likely to require more than five monnoring plots. We recommend using rectangular plots, and each corner of the plots should be permanently marked "~th either a metal fence post or a section of re bar. Data should be collected and reported on the percent cover of installed \Voody species and ferns, as well as 011 the species and percent cover by desirable native volunteers (both herbaceous and wooJ:\ and non-native invasive species. Provide monitoring plot size and location 111formation, and include a map that shows locations of all of the plots. If the consultant and applirnnt chose not to install permanent monitoring plots, the three sections of the mitigation area (North, East, and South) should be assessed separately and the data (specified abm-c) reported separately to determine whether each section is satisfying the Performance SLanJards. 4.c. Provide a description that explains th<.: Ji(L"erence bet\veen "Native Plant Cover" and "Native \V'oo<ly Plant Cover" listed in the Pcrforn1ance Standards. 4.d. Provide a list of dates and c.kscript1on of t11aintenance activities. Include infonnation on activities such as weeding, replacing mulch, replacing plants (nun1bers, species, sizes, mitigation section, etc.), etc. 5. Recommended Actions \'(le concur with the recommended actions 111 thi: -+1 1, Quarter Report, and have incorporated the111 into the rccommcndcJ actions below. 5.a . .:\SAP (unless it has already been done\ Check the irrigation systc111s for all sections. This is particularly important for the norll1 scctiuu where the plants are less shaded. S.b. ASAP: Ahhough located outside of the mitigation area, there arc num.erous newly planted trees (likely Leyland cypress) that are being girdled by tape attached to the stakes. The tape should be removed immediately to pre,-ent mortality and disease. 5.c. Throughout the grov.ring season: Continue to control non-native species (especially those listed in Section 3.c above) according the schedule listed in the 4'h Quarter Report (spring/ early summer 2009, and mid-summer/ early fall 2009). All weeded materials must be removed from the Cedar River Corpora Le Park site and disposed of in a proper manner. In addition to cutting back blackberries, rcn10Ye the cto\vns and roots that arc located within and adjacent to the mitigation areas. Rcmon the bittersweet nightshade immediately as this species can become established \Try quickly. Take care and do not rcn-1ovc desirable native plants during n1aintenance activiric:;. Rctn()Yal should be done by hand and/ or according to methodologies outlined by I<ing Counl\' Noxious Weed Program: http://www.kingcounty.gov/ cm-iron men t / anirnalsJ\ndPlants /noxious-weeds/weed- control-practices /bmp.aspx 5.d. As necessary: Refresh mulch rings around all installed woody plants (especially in the North section) to a minimum depth of 3 inches. Use arborist mulch or wood chips -mulch must K:\prnjcct\31400\3l476A \Reports\.11476A CcdarR.ivcrCorpPark Rc\·it"Y•.J<,c Rocale Tim1no11s, Associate Planner, (,J'ty of Renton Cedar River Corporate Park Monitori,,g Reporl /{niew not touch plant stems. 5.e. During maintenance events: Ren10\·e the trash in the buffer areas. Page 5 June 18, 2009 5.f. During the Year 2 vegetation monitoring c,·ent (Fall 2009): if desired, establish permanent representative monitoring plots as specified in Section 4.b above. If you have any questions regarding these findings, please contact us at (425) 822A446. K:\projcct\31400\31476,\ \Reports\31476A C:cdarRiYcrCorpPark Rev1n1·.Joc Denis Law Mayor April 16, 2009 Charlie Foushee Tarragon Development 1000 2"a Ave Ste #3200 Seattle, WA 98104 Department of Community & Economic Development Subject: Receipt of Third Quarter Monitoring Report Cedar River Corporate Park City of Renton File r06-172 . ) Dear Mr. Foushee: This letter is to inform you I received the follow-up to the third quarter maintenance and monitoring report for the Cedar River Corporate Park wetland mitigation project on March 13, 2009. It appears the maintenance and monitoring project is in compliance. Please note that there was an error in the report; the report submitted was not the second annual report but the third quarter report. I look forward to receiving the fourth quarter report as soon as possible. Please send two copies of the report to my attention, and if you have any questions please feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7219. Sincerely, j~ Current Planning Division cc: City of Renton File No.~ Celeste Botha, Wetla,(d P;,:mitting Services Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov 0 Deltlleation 0 Reconnalssam::e evaluations 0 Permit assUltance and agency coordinadon 0 Professional repart preparation 0 Impact analysi6 and sequenclng WETIAND PERMirnNG SERVICES Phom,: (2o6) 318--?ns F'"'X! (2o6) 323-'7'179 CO!'ll: (Zo-6) 140--l.Jlj wp!l(Q)isp,com Mldgatton planntng and moni.torlng 0 LUI.ear projects (roads, pawer and gas lines) 0 Environmental compllance during <::onstructlon 0 Peer review and permit condi.ti.onlng 0 Wetland lnventories 0 March 13, 2009 Roca le Timmons Associate Planner City of Renton Development Services 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 RE: Cedar River Corporate Park project (LUA 06-172) Buffer restoration and enhancement maintenance inspection Dear Roca le: As specified in the approved Cedar River Corporate Park project (LUA 06-172) Wetland Buffer Mitigation Plan, dated April 16, 2007, a Year 2 maintenance visit of the buffer restoration and enhancement was conducted early, on March 6, 2009. The approved monitoring and maintenance visit schedule is provided below: Year Maintenance Visits Monitoring Report due -------· 1 Between January 1 and March 1 Between January 1 and March 1 March 30 AND AND June 30 Between April 1 and June 1 AND Between April 1 and June 1 AND October 30 Between July 1 and September 30 Between July 1 and September 30 January 31 Between October 15 and Between October 15 and December 30 December 30 ---- 2-5 Between April 1 and June 1 AND Between September 1 and October December 30 Between July 1 and September 30 15 This letter is to confirm that the applicant, Tarragon LLC, has implemented the recommendations of the Year 1 Buffer Enhancement Monitoring Report prepared by WPS and the additional maintenance recommendations listed in the letter from OTAK dated December 18, 2008, as listed below: 5.a. All flags have been removed from the main stem of trees to prevent girdling 5.b. The entire enhancement area was freshly mulched 5.c. All broken split rail fences were repaired 5.d. The silt fence was removed 5.e. The following additional plants were installed as noted below: South of the detention pond: 5 Western red cedar (Thuja plicata}, 2 gal 6 Douglas hawthorn (Crataegus douglasii) 10 thimbleberry (Ru bus parviflorus). 1 gal., multiple branched North of the rain gardens (and within the berm dividing them): 10 big-leaf maple (Acer macrophyllum) 1 gal. 25 thimbleberry (Rubus parviflorus), 1 gal., multiple branched 2025 South Nonnan Street Seattle, Wuhington 0 ¢'Lt4 Page 2 of 2 Cedar River Corporate Buffer Maintenance I March 13, 2009 ion Letter 5.f. Irrigation systems were checked and repaired 5.g. An aggressive invasive species control regimen was implemented 5.h. All trash was removed from the buffers Thank you for the opportunity to provide you with this information. Please do not hesitate to call with questions or concerns. Sincerely, Celeste Botha CC: Charlie Foushee, Tarragon LLC <\'Y o CITY )F RENTON ~}~· 1, :<I'.~ Department of Community and ,,11 Economic Development ~ -~ Denis Law, Mayor Alex Pietsch, Administrator ~N~O,;,,------------------------~ March 12, 2009 Charlie Foushee Tarragon Development 1000 2"d Ave Ste #3200 Seattle, WA 98104 Subject: Second Request for Conformance with Otak Recommendations and Request for the 4•• Quarter Monitoring Report Cedar River Corporate Park City of Renton File LUA06-l 72 Dear Mr. Foushee: This letter is to inform you that a statement from your biologist, confim1ing that Recommendation 5.a-d on the December 18, 2008 memo from Otak has been performed; was due to the City of Renton on March 2, 2009. This letter serves as the second request for the statement. In addition your fourth quarterly monitoring report was due to the City on December 5, 2008. Please send two copies of the statement and the 4'" quarter monitoring report to my attention by April 2"d or this matter will be referred to our Code Compliance Inspector. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 425.430.7219. Sincerely, g,~~ Current Plarming Division cc: Paul Baker, Code Compliance Inspector City of Renton File No. LUA06-l 72 Celeste Botha, WPS -------10_5_5_S_ou_t_h_G_ra_d_y_W_a_y ___ R_e_n_to_n_. V,-'a-sh-i,-,g-to-n-98_0_5_7 _______ ~ @ l his paper conta,n°. 5C·'.-· r,:,cy~lecli · natenal. 30% post consumer Al!E.-\D OF Tl{E (:\)}{VE February 5, 2009 Charlie Foushee Tarragon Development 1000 2"d Ave Ste #3200 Seattle, WA 98104 CITY ~F RENTON Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Alex Pietsch, Administrator Subject: Receipt of 3'd Quarter Monitoring Report Cedar River Corporate Park City of Renton File LUA06-172 Dear Mr. Foushee: I received the 3'd quarter maintenance and monitoring report for the Cedar River Corporate Park from WPS, on October 30, 2008. The report was sent to a third party, Otak, for review. Based on a site assessment; Otak provided a memorandum ( dated December 18, 2008) with comments on the condition of the mitigation areas, a review of the 1" Annual Monitoring Report, and recommended actions for the mitigation areas to help ensure success of the mitigation project. Necessary measures, as recommended on page 5 of the attached memorandum, need to be completed to secure the survival of the plantings. The 4'" Quarter monitoring report should include a follow up statement that the recommended actions have been completed in addition to compliance with the monitoring report comments (5.e-i) also included in the attached memo. However, before your obligation for the 3"1 Quarter report can be fulfilled; your biologist will need to provide a statement that Recommendations 5.a-d, have been performed. Specifically: flagging on the main stem of installed trees has been removed and replaced with new flagging on the side branches of the trees, refresh mulch rings, repair the split rail fence and remove remaining sections of silt fencing. Please submit two copies of the statement to my attention no later than March 2, 2009. Please contact me with any questions (425) 430-7219. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, , :JT~ Planning Division cc: City of Renton File No. LUA06-t 72 Celeste Botha, WPS 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, Washington 98057 @ This papercontaw,s .SC".·" rt:cyc._,l'='c 111aterial. 30% post consumer ,\HEAD OF TtrE CCRVE .. Memorandum I 02 30 .\-h Pr1iJ1!.r D1i1v Jm/e -100 Kirk /.mrl. rr>1 !180 J J P/io11t' (-1-25) s2:.-1--1-1-r; his (-C_ij 82-9_-;..,.- To: From: Copies: Date: Subject: Project No.: Roc:tlc Timmons, .\ssociatc Pbnncr, City of Renton Stcphanil' Smith, \\'ctland Biologist .)u;,mne ~-\nderson, Senior \Vctland Ecologist Dcccmhcr l 8, :2008 RL·Yicw of ?,rd Quarter Cedar River Corpor::itc Park [ )u frcr Lnhanccmcnt l\Iomtoring Report ,111\JE As requested by the City of Renwn, Ot:1k st:t!"f is 11rm·iding third party rc\·inv of the monitoring cfforb at the Cedar Ri\'Ct Corporate l\1rk. T() th:ll end, Otak shiff conducted a site \·isit on l )cccmbcr --l-, :2008. Based on that site ,1sscss111c111 _ this technical mLmorandum pnr .. ·idcs comments on the condition of the mitigation arc::is, :is \\T11 :ts ;1 rcYicw of rhc }"1 C).uarrcrl_r l\Ionitnring Ri:port by \\.ctland Permitting Sen'iccs (\\TS). ·111c Li:-:1 '.'LTtion of this mcmor,mdurn includes recommended actions for the mitigation :11T;1s !() hdp ensure success of the mitigation project. The follo\ving docu1ncnts were lTYic,vcd :111d :11T rd.erenced in this mcn1ornndum: '{car l Fall Buffer F.nhancement .\!onir()ring Report by \\.etland Permitting StTYices <lated October 17, 2008 (r~/ern:rl lo ch the )' .. ' .(}!11.11/i'r rrJJot1); and \'ictlaml Buffer l\litigation Plan IA\\ crhll([ Permrtting Sen-recs dated ,\pril 1(,, 2007 (1rfi1m/ to as tlh' ,\Jit~gatio11 JJ/a11). I . Introduction The Ccdm R..i,-cr Corporate Park is loc1tcd :it 221)11 Lind ,\ycnuc S\\. in the Ciry of Re11Lor1. It is bordered to the north by an undeveloped p;1rnl to the south by utility corridor and an ;:ibandoned right·of--way, to the west by Lind Avenue~\\·, ;md to the cast by a conunercial dcYcloprnent. \\.crlands surrnHnd the Cedar River Corpor'.tle l\1rk on the north, cast, and west sides. No wetland impacts occurred during the developmcnl (lf the office park; howe,,cr, there were temporary and permanent impacts to the wetland buffer. \ s C( impensatory 1nitigation, the \Vetland buffers were enhanced along the entire south side of the den_,Jopment and the majority of the north and east sides of the deYclopment. The buildings :ire located in the center of the parcel, \Vith parking locate<l around the peritneter. The parking are;is arc separated from the buffer enhancement areas by planting strips and a split-rail fence. The buffer enhancement areas are located outside of the split- rail fence, sloping do\VIl to\vards the \verla11ds, :md they have been planted \V:ith a variety of native species (approxi1nately 1250 trees, shrubs, wuoLh groundcoyers, an<l ferns). ,--\<l<litional enhancement K: \ pwj~-ct \_) l lJIJ(J\ _) 1 ().).11 ·:\Rep! ,rt~\) 1 ()) l F ( '.t'd:1rl(1\T r( :orpl 'ark R,_,, 1e,,.·:--, \ .d, ,c • Rocale Timmons, Aswo,lte PlannN, G-.it, o{/{cnton C>rlt1r .RirrrC01porofe Ptrrk ,\lom/ori1{g H.1:;:,/)// F.l'''i\'f/' Page 2 I )nt'1J1bo· I 8, 2008 plantings are locntcJ \vlthln undisturbed p()rnon~ of the wetland buffets_ .-\pproxirnately 400 conifr•rs (300 Douglas firs (P.rmdo!sJ{~ll 111'<'/i~'/:'.\!!> ,mLl 100 wcstt'.tn red cedars (Tht!)d p!IL",J/u)) were planted nmongst existmg shrubs and 11TL'~ 10 compensate for permanent in:ipacts due ro construc6on of the bioswiile and raingmdcns \V-ithin th(' buffer. The approYcd. mitigation plan state:::. then.: arc no performance srand:-tnh or rctJLtircd m1)111rnrin!-~ fnr the -mo conifers planted in the undisrurbcd buffer. The monitored mirjgation an .. 'il. is di\·idnl intn 1hrn: sections. ln rhis memorandum, the buffCr cnhancl'1T1cnt areas arc referred to as 1h<..-~--:orth, l·'.-asr, nnd South Sections. O,·crn!l, the 3,.d Qu;:1rter R .. eport is vet; cnrnplcic. 1 t incJudes nun1crous, helpful site m;1ps; dct-ai!cd planting sheets; extensive data summar;· r:tbk:-;; :1nd wdl-labdcd photos. 2. Performance Standards: Cencraily spi::-aking, \Ve concur with the conclusions uf the 3'"1 Quarter I\Innitoring Report rhat the phntings in the Cedar Rl\'tT Corporate P:1rk buffer enh·;mccmcnt area Rrc Siltisfying the Performance Sli!w.brd;-; spccificLl in tht' i\litigation PLtn :1:; Co)lows: la. t0--20 percent nati\T plant con·r durn,µ \"1.·ar 1. lb. l0-1U percent natiYc \Vood.y phnt l"O\'ct· t~,r forested or scrub-shrub are;1~. 2. Non-n,1tive ill\'JsiYe plant coyer rn,1_\ not L·xcced 1(.Y 1 /u total cO\Tr per spl'cic:-thro1tghout rhc monitoring period up to a torn! (lr 111) y,rcitcr than 20°-'o CO\Tr frCJm inYasl'i·c species. 3. toou/,, plant surYivnrship i~ guararnccd hy the landscaping conttactor for the first ~"l''ilt" after installation. 4. Species diYersit)· standards stare th:n thl"lT will be-~ tn:c species (one of which \Vill be· conift_·.rou~), S ~hrub species, and :2 gn Jund CO\Tr specie:_;. 5. There 1s no performance standard f()r the conifers planted in th<: undisturbe<l buffer. 3. Site Assessment Comments 3.a. Ovetall, the site looks good and rlw 111:-tallcd woody plants generally appear to be healthy ~md thriving, especially in the c1~r ,ind ~outh sections \),·here they are duded by a<ll,1ccnt fon:sted communities. f-Io\.veYl'r, rlwrc ;uc a couple of concerns. ~\s noted in the 3"1 Quarter iionitoring Report, some of the in~Llllcd plants in the North section and East section (F-3 in particular) appear to be :-tressed and ~:cH:ral tnay be dead. There arc aLo SC\Ttill areas along the north property bouriLbry where 1herc are bare sections. 3.b. For identification purposes, fl:-ig.i.:)ng wa:-; tied on n1any of the installed trees in all three sections. \Ye observed that the nagging \\"'cl!:> tightly tied -around the main stern of many of the treesJ -and that as a result n1a11:. <if 1hc in~tallc:d trees arc: in c.hngcr of being girdleJ. 3.c. There ,vas verr little if any rnukh .iround rhc installed plants in the North section. K: \ pn l)((t\ .11 ()I)!)\_) l U ',!i I·.\ !{~r( ,ns\ 3 l (I BJ·: < xJ,u·Hin•r( :, )Tr l'ark 1, L'•,'I•,""'." \.,1. ,, Rocale Tin1mons, Associate PJ;,1n11ct, L'i~,-olRenton (,('ddr Ri!'tT Corpomlr JJi:11i.: .\ionilori,~~ H.t'/'01/ F.1'/'/1'n' Page 3 n1'(1'111ha 18 . .::008 3.d. ;-\lthough control of non-natiYc i11Y:1:-.:iYL' ~pecies generally appears Lo be keeping aerial CO\Tr bclo\v the Performance Stand:rnl rhrc-.;]wld of ten percent) in·•:asi'i'es are becoming established in some areas. The I i1111-11;i t i\T ttl\"asi,T species should be rcrno\'cd as soon as they arc apparent to ensure ncl1il·\·e111cn1 11( rhc 5 Y car l}crformancc Standard. ~-\lthough we ma}· h::i,-c mTr looked some nn11 1uri,:c 111Yasive species due to the time of the Otak site Yisit (December), non-nnti\T species 1 li,lt ,,-v ol1sen:ed that must be controlled include: + I Iirnalayan blackberry rp.Jtfm.1 ,.1mN11i~li'ii.':i: located in patches throughout the site. In the J<'.;1st section, ar the northcist ,·1Hl of rhc bioswalc (F-.)) there is a large pile of blackberry canes that ,vcrc cut b,1ck and tlml\\ 11 11\'Cr the edge of the berm. + thistles (Cinimn J/).\,: mostly i:hln·1du:il phnb at this time, however, there are sorne larger patches of thistle in the N(lrth and! ·'.:1:--t: sections. + bittersweet nightsh,1dc (So/c11.:l1111 tlii/(!1/Jl!lra): there is one area \.Vith bittersweet nightsludc located in the central sccti()n of).; .l. c;tst of the hrge thistle patch. + holly {Jfe.y tl{{lt([O!l'11m): Then· 1:--: :1 h11lh-shrub near the middle of section S--1-that slwulJ be 1'Cnl(>\'C'd. 3.e. In the North and I :ast sectionc-, 1hnL· :tlT are:1s where the silt fence has not been rcmmTd. 3.f. The \'fcrland Ruffer i\.Jitigation Phn 1nd1t :11c~ that ;1 minimum of fiyc monitoring plots will Le establi:d1cd in the field and dcsig1i:itnl \\·ith pcrrnanctll markers. \Ye diJ not obsenT ,my pC'rm,1rwnt 1r1onitonng pints, 1101· drn's 1!1v monitoring report indicHc that the monitoring IS conducted using monitoring plrll--. l:1c-le:1(L monitoring nppeats to be conducted by counting all of the mstallcd phnts, which nu:, he necessary for the first year to determine ,vhethcr the t-ct1uired !()() percent of the ins1:dkd pL1111c-sun'iYed. 3.g. The pbnt qn:1.ntities listed in the :--:,·,·i1011 ~hccts in the report appendix do not alw:1.ys agree with what Otak ::;rnff nutcd in the tlcld 3.h. In rhc Fa:,:;t section, the planted :1rv:1 oi1 the norrh end of the biosw:1.lc (E-3) is either planted rather sparseh· or has suffered :t lr11 ()t" mortality .. \dditional nati,Te trees and shrubs should be installed 111 this area to cnsur1..' th.ii it \\·ill meet the percent cover performance standard during the monitoring period. 3.i. ~-\.t the northeast end of the Lasr sL·ction ·'. I ·-3), just east of the c1uarry spalls, near the l'<IStern property boundary), there is a \Try l:tr~c dense palch of I Iimalayan blackberries. It appears that recent maintenance acti\·itics included cutting back some of the intruding blackberry canes. Unfortunately, so1nc dcs1r;1hlc natl\T species, such as red osier do~vood, were also cut Lack in the process. During future 1n:ii1nenance visits, care must be taken not LO darnage desirable nati,Te plant species. 3.j. There is sonll' tr,1sh in areas all three sections of the rnitigation area. Roc~ile Tinunons, Associate Planner, Ci~,-of Renton Cr:dar lZil't'r Corporate })ark _\loHilo1i1~~ gepurl 1<,r11'n 4. Monitoring Report Comments Page -1- /)ffember 18, 2008 Tn addition to the information currenLly pnl\ 1ded in the yc1 ()uartcr monitonng report, the following information should be included in future rr111t111onn~ reports: 4.a. Include the site address. 4.b. ProYide observations of general :-11c co11d1111ms and \vildlifr use. 4.c. Pro1·idc information regarding tht· mcthndology of ho\v the instnlkd woody plants were counted. I Iowevc.:r, rather than count mg t·ach instnllcd plant, afrer the first rear, we rccomrnend that permanent rcprc:--;t"11!":1ti\"c H:getation monitoring plots be established in each section of the mitigation arc:1. Tht· :rpprun·d ,\litigation Plan stares that a minimum of fi1·e monitoring plots \vill be c;;t:1h1i;;hnl. .\ ;;utTicicnt number of plots should be established so that ;ipproximately :'.::5 percent of tlw 111,;Lilled plants (approximately 300) are counted, and each vegetation community in L'<tcli 111i11,f,,;1ti()t1 section is represented. \Ve recommend using rectangular plots, and each corner oft lie plnrs should be permanently marked \vith either a metal fence post or a sLcLion of rch;1r. The in::;t;illcd "\Voody plants in each plot should be flagged so that they c;in be easily itkn11tlnl from year to year. Data should be collected and reported on the number and pcru.·111 cm·cr ( >f installed \Voody species and ferns, as well as on the species ,rnd percent con .. T h\· d, s1r:1hlc nafr•.T \·oluntcers (both herbaceous and woody), and !lon-!lali\"e in\·asi\T spcnL·:-. Pr()\·ide rnonitoring plot size and location infonnation, and 111clude a m;1p th:ll -...li(l\\·s locations of all of the plots. 4.d. Pro\'iJe observations of the hc:1lrli of rlw 1nsL-1lled plants, i.e. m-c plants vigorous \:vith ne\v grm:vth; arc planb stressed; arc pLu1ts :--:uffvring from herbiniry, etc.? Is there a difference mnong the species? \\"hen installed phnrs die, pnffidc information as to the possible reasons for plant mortality. 4.e. Prc)\'idc a description in the te-:,,;:t ot' 1hl" rcp()rt that explains the detail sheets in du.' report appendix -it is unclear why some ()t. 1\iv 1wrnbers/plants arc crossed out) and \vhy some of them arc typed in red font. 4.f. ProYide a description that explain:-: tht· d11lcrence between '"'Nati,Tc Planr Co\rer" and "\L1.ti,·c \\.oo(h-Plant CoYer" listed in the J>crt~ irin:mcc Standard~. 4.g. Percent surYiYorship column in T:1bk _) i:--: 11ot correct for all of the species -proYide corrections. 4.h. ProYide a list of dates and descri11tio11 or maintenance activities. Include information on activities ~uch as weeding, replacing 111ulch, rq,lacing plants (numbers, species, sizes, mitigation seclion, etc.), etc. Rocale Ti1111no11s, Associate Pla1111er, C'i~l· of Renton C.,rJc,r Ri1'1:F Co,porak i\ul::. ,\loni!orin,~ Re.fol/ J{rl'i1 5. Recommended Actions Pagl' J l)l'd'!)!hff 18. 2008 \\'c concur \Vith rhe recommended ;:icnons in thl' _)"1 (2uarrer Reporl, anJ h,1,T incorpornted them into die rccomn1enJeJ actions be-low. 5.a .. \S.\ P: To pre,·ent da1nage from t•,1nlli11,l,,, retno\T flags on the main sterns of the rrce::; immediately anJ replace with fligs tied 011 hr,rnchcs. Do the same for tlagged shrubs that h,r1:c :1 ccntrnl leader stcin. 5.b . .-\S.\P: Refresh mulch rings around :11l 111sLdlcd woody plants (csp<:cially in lhc North section) to ;:i mini1num depth of J 111clics. l 'sc arborist mulch or wood chips -mulch must not touch plant steins. S.c .. \S,\P: In the North section, tqJair thL· :-,pltl rail fence that has broken cross-bc;irns in the Yicinity of the western portion of"-~- 5.d. ~-\S~ \P: rerno\T remaining secti()tJs nf the :-,ilt fence. 5.e. J n late ,vinter / early sprin~:r: . \cc( m..lrng ro (._hrections to be prm·ided by the projecr biologist (Celeste Botha of\\'edand Permi11111µ ~LT\'tccs), planr additional rutin~ shrubs ,rnd trees in the sparsely vcgerarcd areas, p,1r1ic11L1rly 111 1he North section as well as in the Last section just north of the bios\valc (E--1) .. \;: recommend in the T\1 Quarter Report, d< J not inst,dl red elderberry (Jamlmm.r raa1110.w) or s:11:il (( ,',11rilh1 1ria J'/Ja//rw). 5.f. ln early spring: Check the irrig:t1io11 :-,~stc111s for the °t',jorth section ;ind in the Last section at the north end of the bios\v;ile (I·.-) :1 ,,·lwrc installed plan Ls appL<lr to be srressed. 5.g. In early spring and continuing ilHowd1out the f1rowinp season: Conrrnuc to control 11011- natiYe species (especially those l1srnl in ~LTtion J.d abo\T) according the schedule listed in rhe .\litigation Plan and 3"1 Qumtvr Rcp()rl (early winter ~00~, spring/e;:)rly sun1mer 2009, and mid-summer/early fall 20(0':·. \11 \\Tnlcd matcri;ils must be rernoYed from rhc Ccd;:ir Ri1Tr Corporate Park site and disp();:cd of 111 ;i proper manner. In the I ·:,1st section, blackberry canes that \Vere cut b,,1ck :u the northeast L'IHJ of the bioswale (l: .)) were not remon.·d fron1 the site, inslead 1hc:· \\TtT thrown onto the berm :rnd into the adjacent \\Ttland. In addition to cutting h:1ck bLickbcrric:::, remoYc the crowns and roots thar arc located within tht' 1niLigation al"l':t:-,. Rcmon· the bittersweet nightshade immediately as this ::-:pecies can become established \-en· ljllll'ld:·. Take care and do not remo\T desirable rn1ti,·e plants during maintenance acti\ i11c::-:. l{c11H,\'al should be done by hand ;:ind/ or according to methodologies outlineJ by King Crn1n1y '-soxious \Veed Progra1n: http:/ /\v\vw.kinp-county.gcw /c11Yin 111111c11t / anirnab.:\ndPlants/noxious weeds /wccd- con trol-practices /bmp. as px 5.h. During maintenance e,,.ents: H.uno\ l' thv trash in the buffer areas. 5.i. Before/during: the Year..-, ,·egeL1tiu11 monitoring event (Fall 2001:h Either flag all installed \Vood}· plants if they are counted mdi\ tdual!y, or establish permanent representatiYe n1onitoring plots as specified in ~ccl t( 111 I .c above. lf you ha,'c any questions regarding these tlnding;:, please contact us at (-+25) 822--+-+-+6. K.\pn,ju:t\.'i [\)\)()\) 10.Bl·'.\lfrrorts\) I() \JI,'. ( :,shrll:in'r( '.orpl'ark ll.~-,. w-, ~ \ ,!< .. , Denis Law, Mayor November 18, 2008 Charlie Foushee Tarragon 1000 Second Ave, Suite 3200 Seattle, Washington 98104 Subject: Request for Release of Security CITY 0F RENTON Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator Cedar River Corporate Park Wetland Mitigation City File #LUA06-172 Dear Mr. Foushee: I'm writing in response to the 10/3/08 letter I received from you, requesting the release of security funds for the instillation of the mitigation project along with the approval of the draft contracts for maintenance and monitoring. In order to release your security, I will need the following: Maintenance and Monitoring Contract Changes -It appears that the draft contract includes only provisions for the replanting and the maintenance thereof. Please provide a revised provide a draft that includes provisions for the monitoring of the mitigation project. The draft contract language must ensure compliance with both the performance standards of the approved Wetland Pennitting Services mitigation plan as well the maintenance and monitoring standards of the Renton Municipal Code. The scope of the contract must clearly cover the cost of plant maintenance and replacement as well. The language in the contract must also guarantee that "structures, improvements. and mitigation perform satisfactorily for a period of 5 years" ( e.g. add provisions for plant replacement and weed removal referencing compliance with the survival rates noted in the final approved wetland mitigation plan. The contract must include quarterly monitoring reports for the first year and annual reports thereafter. Final Release oflnstallation Surety and Replacement with Monitoring and Maintenance Surety -In order to release the installation security device we must first receive the replacement maintenance and monitoring security device. Based on the final contract, I will be able to provide you with the required surety device amount (at 125% of the amount). After I receive the new surety device (and the items noted in this letter) the City will be able to release your installation surety. -------l-0-55-So_u_th_G_ra_d_y_W_a_y ___ R_e-nt-on-,-\-\ia_s_h_in-gt_o_n_9_8_0_57 _______ ·~ @ This paper contains 50% recycled rnatenal, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE I Feel free to contact me at 425-430-7219 with any questions. Sincerely, ~~ e Timmons ciate Planner cc: Celeste Botha, Wetland Permitting Services File #LUA06-1~ October 2, 2008 Rocale Timmons City of Renton Development Services 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 RE: Cedar River Corporate Park Final Wetland Mitigation Plan File No. LUA06-l 72 Dear Ms. Timmons: n TARRAGON As part of Cedar River Corporate Park's wetland nul!gation plan with the City of Renton, Tarragon-Cedar River Corporate Park LLC. the owner, must provide executed contracts with subcontractors addressing wetland monitoring, total wetland replacement, and wetland maintenance to the City for approval. Please find the appropriate contracts attached. It is my understanding that once the contract,; are approved then the City will request a maintenance and monitoring surety. According to the letter sent from Jill Ding (City of Renton) to Jim Carleton (AIIBL), the project's architect. once the City has obtained the maintenance and monitoring surety then the City will release the performance surety of $92-993.72. Please notify myself through either email or a letter of the City's approval of all contracts and the request for a maintenance and monitoring surety. My contact information is below: 1000 2"d Ave, Suite 3200 Seattle, WA 98104 cfoushee@tarragon.com CC: Murphy !'vlcCullough 1000 Second Ave., Suite 3200 Seanle, WA 98104 206 2339600 P 206 233 0260 f www. to It agon .com VENDOR AGREEMENT Cedar River Corporate Park Wetland Mitigation Northwest Landscape Services ii TARRAGON This Vendor Agreement is made this 61h day of June 2008 (the "Agreement'') by and between the parties named below with respect to the Property commonly known as "Cedar River Corporate Park,') 2200 Lind Avenue Southwest in Renton, Washington (the "Property"): Owner: Tarragon -Cedar River Corporate Park L.L.C. 1000 Second Ave Suite 3200 Seattle, WA98104 Tel: 206-233-9600 Fax: 206-233-0260 Contact: Contact: E-Mail: Tel: Fax: Vendor: Contact: E-Mail: Tel: Fax: Federal Taxpayer ID: UBI No.: Industrial Insurance No.: Subcontractor License No.: Liability Insurance Policy No.: Tarragon L.L.C., Owner's Manager 1000 Second Ave Suite 3200 Seattle, WA 98104 Charlie Foushee -Assoc. Development Manager cfoushee@tarragon.com 206-233-9600 206-233-0260 Northwest Landscape Services of Washington L.L.C. PO Box 864 Woodinville, WA 98072 Tom DeMieco -Managing Partner tomd@nlswa.com 425-481-0919 425-485-9601 91-1372383 602 741 247 572,880-01 NORTHLS937PQ Exp. 12/13/2009 Exp. ___ _ Certificate of Insurance Received/Approved: / Completed Form W-9 Received/Approved: / Site Safety Plan, if required Received/Approved: / Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) Received/Approved: / Tarragon Job #: ·• A. WORK. 1. DESCR1PTI0N OF WORK. Vendor agrees to furnish all required labor, material, supplies, supervision, transportation, licenses, insurance, taxes and permits as required by federal, state and local jurisdictions in performing the work as described hereto as Exhibit A for the Property as described and delineated in Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Work"). Vendor acknowledges and agrees that Vendor is fully familiar with all terms, obligations and conditions under which the Work is to be performed. Vendor shall examine the site and any surfaces upon which work is to be performed, and shall notify the General Contractor in writing of any conditions which might adversely affect its work. Failure to do so shall constitute a waiver of entitlement to any additional compensation or change in schedule arising out of such conditions. By commencing work on the site and any surfaces upon which the Work is to be performed, the Vendor warrants that all such areas are acceptable and suitable to the Vendor and for the performance of its Work. Vendor warrants that it is entering into this Agreement based upon Vendor's investigation of all such matters, and is in no way relying upon opinions or representations of Owner. 2. CHANGES IN THE WORK (CHA.!'\JGE ORDERS). The Owner, without invalidating the Agreement, may order extra work or make changes by altering, adding to or deducting from the Work, the Contract Price and/or Schedule. When a change results in the addition of cost to the base Contract Price, a Change Order must be signed by both parties before any work on the alteration is started and before any Payment may be made for such work. 3. INDEPENDENT INSPECTION. At any time and without notice to Vendor, Owner may elect to utilize the services of an independent inspection service to ensure, monitor and verify quality of the Work, and compliance with all city, county, state and federal ordinances, laws, and regulations. Vendor acknowledges and agrees that it shall be required, without additional cost to Owner, to adhere to any and all recommendations made pursuant to such inspection. 1. INSPECTIONS. Vendor shall bear the responsibility for the scheduling of inspections with the City or other governing authorities, if applicable, for the Work and for notifying the Owner's Manager of impending inspections at the time the inspection is scheduled. If the Vendor is not prepared for a scheduled inspection, then Vendor will be responsible for the cost of any re-inspection fees that may result there from. Additionally, Vendor will be required to pay any additional fees for inspections performed outside of normal working hours of the applicable inspection authority. l)\ 4e, T ~v w, JM es B. TERM. This Vendor Agreement shall be in effect commencing on June 6, 2008 and terminating on June 5, 2013, unless terminated earlier pursuant to Section K described below. Owner may terminate this Vendor Agreement upon ten (10) days written notice to Vendor without cause. C. FEES. 1. VENDOR PRICE. Vendor shall be paid the sums as outlined in the Proposal/Scope of Work as shown in Exhibit A. Vendor Agreement /WetlandMttigation ~ Northwest Landscape Services Tarragon -Cedar River Corporate Park Page2of17 < , 2. PAYMENT. a) Vendor shall submit an invoice for payment on or before the 25th day of the month and shall include an executed "Conditional Waiver and Release of Lien" attached as Exhibit D for the applicable progress payment. Invoices should be submitted to: Tarragon -Cedar River Corporate Park L.L.C. c/o Tarragon L.L.C, its Manager 1000 z•d Avenue, Suite 3200 Seattle, Washington 98104 Attn: Charlie Foushee-Associate Development Manager b) Owner shall make progress payments for all sums properly included on the Vendor's invoice for the applicable Payment Period by the 25th day of the following month. c) Owner shall not be obligated to pay for additional work performed by Vendor without an authorized and approved Change Order signed by Owner and/or its Managing Agent. Payment for such additional work will be issued in the same manner as described above. 3. PAYMENTS WITHHELD. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Owner may withhold or nullify the whole or part of any payment to such extent as may be necessary to protect Owner from loss, liability or expense, including attorneys' fees and costs, on account of: a) Defective work not remedied b) Claims filed or reasonable evidence indicating probable filing of a claim c) Failure of Vendor to properly make payments to its subcontractors or for material, labor or fringe benefits d) A reasonable doubt that this Agreement can be completed for the balance then unpaid; or e) Damage to another contractor or subcontractor. When Owner has been satisfied, in its sole discretion, that the concerns raised above have been satisfactorily addressed, such amounts as are then due and owing for the Work completed by Vendor shall be paid or credited to Vendor. Under no circumstances will Vendor be entitled to recover any costs or receive any cash or credit attributable to work not completed by V ender as a result of exercise by Owner of any right or remedy arising from Vend or's default. D. PERMITS. Vendor agrees to procure any and all permits which may be required by the applicable authorities for the service/products to be provided by the V ender hereunder, at the expense of the Vendor. E. PERFORMANCE. 1. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. Vendor shall perform the Work with due diligence and shall complete the Work in accordance with Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this Vendor Agreement /Wetland Mitigation~ Northwest Landscape Services Tarragon-Cedar River Corporate Park Page3of17 . ' reference, as the same may be modified from time to time, in writing, by Owner. Vendor shall not hinder or delay other contractors, vendors or material suppliers from completing their work. 2. SCHEDULING OF WORK. Vendor shall contact the Owner's Manager for approval before making any delivery of material or equipment, or commencing the Work. F. WAIVER AND RELEASE OF LIEN. Vendor shall be required to disclose to Owner the names of any and all material suppliers and/or subcontractors used in completion of the Work. Owner shall have the right to malce any payments to Vendor under this Agreement by joint check to the Vendor and any of its materials suppliers, subcontractors or laborers. Vendor expressly agrees to keep the Property free from any and all liens that may be filed in connection with services performed by Vendor or its suppliers in association of any Work performed on the Property, and shall defend and hold Owner harmless there from. G. SAFETY AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. 1. SAFE SITE. Vendor shall at all times during the performance of the Work maintain competent on-site supervision, and at all times be responsible for the safety of all personnel, equipment, and materials within the Vendor's care, custody or control . The safety of any persons affiliated with this Property is the highest priority to the Owner. a) All employees of the Vendor are required to wear protective gear required for Vendor's safe completion of the Work and as set forth in Vendor's Safety Plan and/or the Owner's Safety Manual. b) The Subcontractor will provide its own Safety Plan before commencing work in this project. c) Vendor shall explicitly instruct all individuals in all safety requirements and ensure that no person shall work in any unsafe condition or manner. Vendor shall take all necessary safety precautions pertaining to its work and the conduct thereof, including but not limited to, compliance with all applicable law, ordinances, rules regulations and orders issued by a public authority, whether federal, state, local or other, the Occupational Safety and Health Act, the Washington Industrial Safety and Health Act, and any safety measures requested by Owner/Owner's Manager. d) Vendor shall, at all times be responsible for providing a safe work site and be responsible f9r the safety of all personnel, equipment, and materials within Vendor's care, custody or control. Vendor shall immediately provide Owner with written notice of any safety hazard or violation found anywhere on or adjacent to the construction site Property. Further, if Owner is assessed a fine due to any unsafe job site condition for which Vendor has assumed responsibility under this paragraph, Vendor shall immediately reimburse General Owner the amount of such fine. 3. DRUGS AND ALCOHOL PROHIBITED. Vendor acknowledges that Owner has a policy prohibiting the use of controlled substances, drugs, or alcoholic beverages of any kind prior to and/or during working hours, either on Owner's Property or any other location while acting as an agent for Owner. Failure to comply or cause compliance with this paragraph shall constitute a breach of this Agreement by Vendor and shall be grounds for inunediate termination of this Agreement by Owner. Vendor Agreement /Wetland Mitigation -Northwest Landscape Services Tarragon -Cedar River Corporate Park Page4ofl7 3. CLEAN AND ORDERLY WORK SITE. a) Owner will not tolerate pets or children on the site. Vehicles are to be only parked in designated parking areas during while Vendor is performing its Work, and shall not enter or park on driveways or off road at any time. b) At all times during the completion of the Work, Vendor shall maintain the work area in a clean, safe and orderly condition and shall at all times keep the premises free from accumulations of debris, waste materials, scrap or rubbish caused by its work. The burning of any material or debris on the Property is prohibited. Vendor shall routinely arrange and remove all rubbish, tools, surplus materials and other articles from and about the buildings and Property, as to never create a safety hazard, and shall leave its work in a "broom clean" condition at all times. In the event Vendor fails to remove its property, Owner, at its option and without waiver of other rights, may treat all such property as abandoned. Vendor shall upon request of Owner immediately return to any area of the job and do such work as is necessary to comply with the provisions of this paragraph. If Vendor fails to do so, Owner may perform the work and charge back the cost to the Vendor. 4. HAZARDOUS WASTE. Vendor shall not cause or permit, and shall take every care to prevent any production, deposit, disposal or spill of hazardous substances during performance of this Agreement. In the event that any hazardous wastes are generated on the work site by Vendor, its agents, employees, subcontractors or invitees, Vendor shall, at its sole cost, remove such waste daily and shall be solely responsible for transport, storage and disposal in accordance with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, Hazardous Materials Transportation Act and all other similar federal, state and local laws and regulations as now or hereafter enacted or amended. Unused portions of hazardous substances shall not be stored on the work site but shall be removed daily by Vendor and properly handled in accordance with all applicable laws. Vendor shall indemnify and hold harmless the Owner from any claims, costs, damages, fines and attorneys' fees and costs, for both defense and for establishing the Owner's right of indemnification, arising out of or in any way related to the handling, use, transport, storage or disposal of hazardous substances by V ender, its agents, employees, subcontractors or invitees in the course of the performance of this Agreement. The term "hazardous substances" shall be as defined by the Superfund Act (Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended) and shall include any similar definition of a substance subject to similar control by state or local Jaw, including petroleum and petroleum products. 4. HAZARDOUS COMMUNICATION AND SAFETYSTANDARDS. a) Vendor shall comply with all provisions, safety standards and specific safety requirements of Owner and of any federal, state or local authority, including, without limitation, the requirements of the Occupational Safety Health Act of 1970, (including, the Hazardous Communication Standard, ''HCS") the Construction Safety Act of 1969 or similar laws and regulations as now enacted or hereafter enacted and amended. Vendor Agreement /Wetland Mitigation -Northwest La1tdscape Sen.Jices Tarragon -Cedar River Corporate Park Page5of17 . ·' b) Vendor shall provide Owner with appropriate Material Safety Data Sheets (M.S.D.S.) prior to delivering a hazardous chemical to a work site. In the event that Vendor's work materials do not require an M.S.D.S. and no hazardous substance are to be used on the worksite, Vendor shall so certify, in writing, to Owner. c) Owner may at any time during the performance of this Agreement prohibit the delivery or demand the immediate removal of any such hazardous substances, which prohibition shall be immediately effective upon notification by Owner to Vendor. Failure of Owner to prohibit the delivery or to demand the removal of any one or more hazardous substances shall not relieve Vendor of its responsibilities and obligations under this Agreement. d) Any hazardous substances brought onto the worksite shall be handled and used in accordance with product specifications and in full compliance with all applicable laws. In the event of a spill or release of a reportable quantity of a hazardous substance Vendor shall immediately notify the Owner's Manager. Vendor shall be responsible for statutory reporting and shall bear all costs for clean up. H. VENDOR EMPLOYEES. 5. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT. Vendor shall at its own expense conform to the equal employment opportunity policies of Owner, if applicable, and shall comply with all equal employment opportunity requirements promulgated by any gove=ental authority including, without limitation, the requirements of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and any other statutes or ordinances, plans or programs, inclusive, and all successors and amendments thereto, and all plans, programs, standards and regulations which have been or shall be promulgated or approved by the parties or agencies which administer said acts or orders (herein collectively referred to as EEO Jaws). 6. COMPLIANCE. Vendor shall have and exercise full responsibility for compliance with EEO laws by itself, its agents, employees, materialmen and subcontractors with respect to the Work, and shall directly receive, respond to, defend and be responsible for any citation, assessment, fine or penalty by reason of Vendor's failure or failure of Vendor's agents, employees, materialmen and subcontractors to so comply with EEO laws. Vendor shall defend and indemnify and hold Owner harmless from and against any liability, loss, damage, cost, claims, awards, judgments, fines, expenses, including litigation expenses, reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, claims or liability for harm to persons or property, expenses incurred pursuant to or attendant to any hearing or meeting and any other applicable cost which may be incurred by Owner resulting from Vendor's failure to fulfill the requirements set forth in this paragraph. 7. NONCOMPLIANCE. In the event Vendor fails to comply with (a) any citation issued by the Washington State Department of Labor & Industries, Secretary of Labor, any order issued by the Occupational Safety and Health review commission, the Environmental Protection Agency, or of any other body responsible for the administration and/or enforcement of any statute regulation or ordinance relating to occupational health and safety or environmental regulations, including, without limitation, the HCS, within the period specified in any such citation or order; or (b) with any of the aforementioned EEO or EPA laws, or any judgment, order or award issued by the Office of Federal Contract Compliance, United States Department of Labor, or any other federal, state or local Vendor Agreement !Wetland Mitigation -Nortl1west Landscape Services Tarragon -Cedar River Corporate Park Page6 of 17 agency or any court of law, or any other body responsible for the administration and/or enforcement of any EEO or EPA laws, with the period specified by such law, judgment, order or award, Owner may, at its discretion, exercise the rights and remedies provided under this Agreement. 8. PAYROLL OBLIGATIONS. Vendor is an independent contractor for all purposes and is solely responsible for all payroll taxes, deductions and contributions under federal or state laws. Vendor shall defend and indemnify Owner against liability for the payment of any and all contributions or taxes for unemployment insurance, old age retirement benefits, pensions or annuities, or wage or income taxes, now or hereafter imposed by federal, state or political subdivision thereof, whether measured by the wages, salaries or other remuneration paid to any persons employed by or performing any work on behalf of Vendor. In the event that Owner is compelled by reason of lien claim or union requirement to make any payments directly to any employees of Vendor whom Vendor has failed to pay, such payments shall be made from the account of the Vendor, as the employer, and Vendor agrees as such employer to prepare and file such returns with respect to said payment as might be required under federal or state law, and to pay any taxes attributable to such payments. 9. UNION OBLIGATIONS. In the event the Vendor is party to or bound by any Agreement with a labor union or related entity, Vendor shall comply with all warranties, obligations, rules, regulations, terms, conditions and responsibilities which are or may be imposed upon Owner or any of its contractors or material suppliers pursuant to such Agreement. Vendor's obligations hereunder shall include but not be limited to making payments to all health, welfare, pension, vacation or apprenticeship trust fimds. Vendor shall obtain from any subcontractor a representation and agreement for the benefit of Owner binding such subcontractor to comply with the provisions of this paragraph. In the event of the Vendor or any of its subcontractors are delinquent in payment of any obligation to any labor union or related entity under this paragraph, Owner shall have the further right to pay the amounts so deducted directly to the appropriate entity. Vendor hereby expressly authorizes Owner to act as its agent for that purpose. Further, Vendor will indemnify and hold Owner harmless from any loss, liability, expense or claim, including attorneys' fees and costs, from any failure of Vendor to fulfill its obligations under this paragraph. The failure of Vendor to fulfill its obligations under this paragraph shall be deemed an Event of Default. I. INSURANCE. Prior to commencement of the Work, Subcontractor shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect during the t= thereof, at Subcontractor's sole expense, the insurance coverage described in Exhibit C attached hereto. 1. PROOF OF INSURANCE. Current proof of insurance shall be provided to the Owner and Owner's Manager in the form of Certificate and Policy Endorsements. Neither acknowledgement nor approval of the insurance by the General Contractor or Owner shall relieve or decrease the liability of the Vendor hereunder. 2. NOTICE OF CANCELLATION. If any such insurance is cancelled or due to expire during the Agreement period, the Subcontractor shall not permit the insurance coverage to lapse, shall furnish evidence to the General Contractor and Owner, and shall provide at least 45 days written notice to the Owner/Owner's Manager of cancellation of any such insurance. Vendor Agreement /Wetland Mitigation -Northwest Landscape Services Tarragon -Cedar River Corporate Park Page 7of 17 J. INDEMNIFICATION. 1. GENERALLY. Vendor specifically and expressly agrees to defend, indemnify and save harmless Owner, its officers, agents and employees against any and all loss, damage, suits, liability, claims, demands or costs resulting from injury or harm to persons or property, including claims of Vendor's own employees, arising out of or in any way connected to Vendor's performance hereunder. In the event of the concurrent negligence of Vendor and Owner, Owner shall be liable only to the extent of Owner's concurrent negligence. Vendor's activities shall be deemed to include those of its officers, agents, subcontractors and material suppliers. 2. MlJI'UAL NEGOTIATION. Vendor specifically aclmowledges that this indemnity was mutually negotiated by the parties herein. In the event oflitigation between the parties to enforce the rights under this paragraph, reasonable attorneys' fees shall be allowed to the prevailing party. 3. INCLUSIONS. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Vendor's indemnity includes claims caused by the use, misuse or failure of any vehicle, rigging, blocking, scaffolding or other things used by Vendor, even though such vehicle, rigging, blocking, scaffolding or other things be rented, loaned or furnished to Vendor by Owner. The defense and indemnity obligation specifically applies to operations in close proximity to power lines and other utilities. 4. WAIVER. Vendor specifically and expressly waives any immunity that it may have under the Industrial Insurance Act, Title 51 RCW, and acknowledges that this waiver was mutually negotiated by the parties herein. ~ Vendor's Initials "'.f? Owner's Initials <-{:!/-----,<----- K. VENDOR DEFAULT AND OWNER REMEDIES. 1. GENERALLY. In the event that Vendor (a) at any time refuses or neglects to supply a sufficient number of properly skilled workers or a sufficient quantity of materials of proper quality, or (b) is adjudicated as bankrupt, or files an arrangement proceeding, or commits any act of insolvency, or makes an assignment for benefit of creditors without Owner's consent, or (c) fails to make prompt payment to its material suppliers and laborers, or ( d) fails in any respect to properly and diligently prosecute the Work, or ( e) otherwise fails to fully perform any of its obligations herein contained ( each of which shall be referred as an "Event of Default"), Owner may at its option: (i) after giving forty-eight ( 48) hours written notice to Vendor, provide any such labor and materials as may be necessary to fulfill Vendor's obligations hereunder and deduct the cost thereof from any money then due or thereafter to become due to Vendor for completed Work; or (ii) terminate Vendor's right to proceed with the Work. In the event Owner exercises options (i) or (ii) above, Owner shall have the right to enter upon the premises of the job and, for the purpose of completing the Work, take possession of all materials and employ any other person or persons to finish the Work and provide the materials therefore. In case of termination of Vendor's right to proceed with the Work, Vendor shall not be entitled to receive any further payment under this Agreement until the Work undertaken by Owner is completely finished. At that time, if the unpaid balance of the amount to be . Vendor Agreement/Wetland Mitigation -Northwest Landscape Services Tarragon -Cedar River Corporate Park Page8 of 17 paid for Work completed by Vendor under this Agreement exceeds the expenses incurred by Owner in finishing Vendor's Work ("Owner's Completion Expenses"), such excess shall be paid by Owner to Vendor; but, if Owner's Completion Expenses shall exceed such unpaid balance for Work completed by Vendor before termination by Owner, then Vendor shall promptly pay to Owner the amount by which Owner's Completion Expenses exceed such unpaid balance. Owner's Completion Expenses shall include expenses incurred by Owner for furnishing materials, :finishing the work, attorneys' fees and any damages sustained by Owner by reason of Vendor's default, plus a markup of 15% general overhead and 10% profit on any and all such expenses, and Owner shall have a lien upon all materials taken possession of, to secure the payment thereof. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Owner shall have the right to terminate this Agreement at any time for any reason, in which case the Vendor shall not be entitled to any compensation for the loss of any anticipated profit or income but shall be entitled to payment of the applicable Agreement Price based upon a percentage of completion of the Work performed prior to the date of termination as determined by Owner in its sole and absolute discretion. 2 REMEDY. The remedies set forth herein shall be cumulative and in addition to any other remedies provided by law. Owner shall be entitled to pursue any and all remedies available at law or in equity to compensate Owner for any damages, including costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees, sustained by reason of failure of Vendor to perform its obligations under this Agreement. L. MISCELLANEOUS. 1. LICENSE. Vendor shall hold a proper and valid business license in conformity with the requirements of the City of Renton, State of Washington or any other applicable jurisdiction in which the Work is being performed. 2. TITLE AND RISK OF LOSS. Title to all materials and/or fixtures shall be deemed vested in Owner when, and as the same shall have been installed or otherwise affixed permanently to the realty on the job. Owner shall not be liable for loss or damage to any material or :fixtures as to which title is not then vested in Owner at the time of such loss or damage as herein provided, whether such material or :fixtures are on the site, in transit, under the control of Owner or otherwise. 3. FORCE MAJEURE. If as a result of fire, earthquake, act of God, war, strikes, picketing; boycotting, lock outs, government, judicial or administrative order or other causes beyond the control of Owner, Owner deems it advisable not to proceed with the Work, Owner may at its option give written notice thereof to Vendor to discontinue any further Work until such time as Owner deems it advisable that the Work be resumed. Owner may, at its option, in the alternative terminate this Agreement. Vendor shall not be entitled to any damages or compensation because of such cessation of Work or termination of this Agreement. In the event of termination, Owner's sole obligation hereunder shall be to pay for the reasonable value of Work performed or materials accepted up to that date, not exceeding the Agreement Prices, for such portion completed by Vendor. Vendor shall continue to be liable on warranties and indemnities under this Agreement. Such cessation or termination shall not preclude Owner's right to withhold sums then owing to Vendor to protect Owner from loss on account of matters hereinabove referred to in this Agreement. Vendor Agreement !Wetland Mitigation -Northwest Landscape Services Tarragon -Cedar River Corporate Park Page9 of 17 . ·' 4. ASSIGNMENT OF AGREEMENT. Vendor shall not, without the prior written consent of Owner, assign, transfer or sublet any portion or part of the Work, or assign any payments hereunder or this Agreement to others. Owner may assign or transfer the whole or part of this Agreement and its rights hereunder. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the parties hereto. 5. W AIYER. The waiver, expressly or by implication, by Owner of any provision of this Agreement at any time shall not operate as or be deemed to constitute a future or further waiver by Owner of any right or remedy reserved to Owner under any provision of this Agreement. 6. ENTIRE .AGREEMENT. This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding and agreement of the parties. All prior estimates, bids, proposals, statements, representations and agreements are merged herein and superseded hereby. Vendor has not relied upon any statement, representation or agreement not set forth in this Agreement. 7. NOTICES. Any notice, demand, request, consent, approval or communication that either party desires or is required to give to the other party or any other person shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by registered or certified United States mail, or by overnight courier or by facsimile transmission ( collectively, "Notice"). Any Notice shall be addressed to the other party at the address appearing on the first page of this Agreement. Notice shall be deemed communicated within three (3) business days from the time of deposit in the United States mail if mailed as provided in this paragraph, or. upon delivery or refusal of delivery if delivered personally or by overnight courier or upon confirmation of receipt by machine or verified personally if delivered by facsimile. Although either party shall have the right to change its address for notice purposes from time to time, any notice delivered pursuant to this paragraph to the address set forth on the first page of this Agreement or to such other addresses as may be hereafter specified in writing in accordance with this paragraph shall be effective even if actual delivery cannot be made as a result of a change in the address of the recipient of such notice if the party delivering the notice has not received actual written notice in accordance with the provisions of this paragraph of the current address to which notices are sent. 8. ARBITRATION AND INDEMNITY. Any dispute, controversy, or claim arising out of or in connection with, or relating to this Agreement or any breach or alleged breach hereof, shall, at the sole written election of Owner, be submitted to, and resolved by, binding arbitration. The arbitration shall be conducted by the American Arbitration Association ("AAA") and pursuant to its Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures. The pool of potential arbitrators shall be limited to arbitrators residing in King County, Washington and that the arbitration proceeding shall be before one neutral arbitrator appointed by the AAA. The arbitration shall take place in Seattle, Washington. The substantially prevailing party is entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including attorneys' fees and arbitration fees and expenses, as determined by the arbitrator. Where there is any common question of law or fact, Owner at its sole discretion, may join third parties to this arbitration, join Vendor to another arbitration involving Owner and a third party, and/or consolidate another arbitration proceeding with this arbitration. Vendor Agreement /Wetland Mitigation -Northwest Landscape Services Ta1ragon -Cedar River Corporate Park Page 10of17 . . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and sealed this Agreement as of the date set forth below. OWNER: Its: [IZ 7)wf,~,M4f2-· Date: _3_(?!{--"-~-=-___ _ VENDOR: NORTHWEST LXAPE SERVICES OF w ASHINGTON L.L.C. By: a_ . Name: Lem ,1~·/()u .. o Its: (Y}~d ~£ Date: ----"'-'--'/'-"E,.,,bµ/o...,?.,__ __ _ LIST OF EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT A: EXHIBITB: EXHIBITC: EXHIBITD: EXHIBITE: PROPOSAL/SCOPE OF WORK PROPERTY MAP/SITE PLAN INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS LIEN RELEASE FORM WETLAND BUFFER MITIGATION PLAN Vendor Agreement !Welland Mitigation -Nortlrwest Landscape Services Tarragon -Cedar River Corporate Park Page JI of 17 ' . SE EXHIBIT A PROPOSAL/SCOPE OF WORK 6 'l.008 Revised Property: Cedar River Corporate Park, 2200 Lind Avenue. Southwest, Renton, WA Vendor: Northwest Landscape .services Work: Wetland Mitigation Replant, Split Rail Fence and Signage Vendor acknowleges that the work that is included in this agreement is already in place, but is required by the City ofRenton.jn case a portion or all of the landscaping fails and needs to be replaced. If formally requested in writing by the City of Renton and or the Owner, Vendor shall provide all supervision, equipment, labor, plants, materials, tools and transportation to perform the ·above referenced· work. Work shall be accomplished in accordance with industry standards and per the terms and general conditions set forth in this Agreement. If formally requested in writing by the City of Renton and or the Owner, the Vendor shall plant wetland plants per the Cedar River Corporate Park Wetland Buffer 1£tigation Plan prepared by Wetland Permitting Services and dated April 16, 2007 (attached Exhibit E), as well as furnish and install 1,800 linear feet split rail fence and wetland signage as described in the mitigation plan. Total Fee .............. : ......................................... : ......................... , .................................................... $30,972.00 End of Exhibit A Vendor Agreement /Wetland Mitigation. -Northwest Landscape Services Tarragon-Cedar Rtver Corporate Park Initials: Vendor Owner Page 12 of 17 EXHIBIT B PROPERTY MAP/ SITE PLAN Vendor Agreement /Wetland Mitigation -Northwest Landscape Services Tarragon -Cedar River Corporate Park Page 13 of 17 ' . EXHIBIT C INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Before commencing work, the Subcontractor shall furnish the Owner and Owner's Manager evidence that the following insurance is in force and will cover all operations under the Subcontractor Agreement. A copy of the insurance policy's specific endorsement(s), waiver of subrogation and additional insured wording shall be submitted along with the current and original Certificate of Insurance. Vendors Liability Insurance: All insurance carriers used shall have a Best Rating of AV or better. I. Workers Compensation: Contingent Employers Liability (Washington Stop Gap) with minimum limits of: • $1,000,000 each accident • $1,000,000 Disease Policy Limit • $1,000,000 Disease Each Employee Vendor shall secure its liability for industrial injury to its employees in accordance with the provisions of Title 51 of the Revised Code of Washington. Managing Agent shall be responsible for confirming compliance with this provision through the Department of Labor & Industries website. Il. Commercial General Liability ISO Occurrence Form CGOOOl • Premises-Operations • Independent Vendors • Products-Completed Operations • Broad Form Property Damage • Contractual Liability (Hold Harmless Coverage) • Per Property Aggregate Combined single limits Bodily Injury and Property Damage: • $1,000,000 Each Occurrence • $1,000,000 Personal & Advertising Injury Limit • $2,000,000 Products/Completed Operations Limit • $2,000,000 General Aggregate Limit Coverage shall name Owner and its Managing Agents as Primary Additional Insured (ISO Form CG2010 11/85; CG2037 or equivalent, CG2015 vendors endorsement), and such coverage shall be non-contributory with respect to any insurance carried by the Owner, its Agents and Managing Agents and shall include "Completed Operations For Your Work". The following shall be named additional insured: Tarragon-Cedar River Corporate Park L.L.C. as Owner, Tarragon L.L.C. as Manager, and Tarragon Construction L.L.C. as General Contractor, Vendor Agreement /Wetland Mitigation -Northwest Landscape Se,,,ices Tarragon -Cedar River Corporate Park Page 14 of 17 . ill. Umbrella Liability Insurance Limits of Insurance: • $1,000,000 Each Occurrence • $1,000,000 Aggregate • $10,000 Maximum Self-Insurance Retention IV. Automobile Liability (Owned, Non-owned, Hired or Leased) • $1,000,000 Combined Single Limit Bodily Injury and Property Damage V. Environmental Services If the work to be performed involves hazardous materials or pollution or other environmental services, the requirement of Pollution Liability Insurance shall be required. Minimum Limits of Liability: • $5,000,000 Each Occurrence • $5,000,000 Aggregate VIII. Additional requirements for All Insurance Required All policies shall contain a waiver of subrogation ( also referred to as Transfer of Rights of Recovery against Others) ISO Form CG 2404; and Per Property Aggregate CG2503; or equivalents. Any major exclusion added by endorsement which may restrict coverage as respects this Property shall be identified. The work to be performed shall be clearly identified on the certificate of insurance under "Description of Work to be Performed", and shall include the Job: Cedar River Corporate Park Notice of Cancellation: Certificates of Insurance and required endorsements shall be filed with the Owner or its Managing Agents prior to commencement of work. The insurance shall be maintained for the life of the Agreement (including maintenance and/or guarantee periods) as stated above and shall contain a provision that coverage will not be materially changed, cancelled or allowed to lapse without 45 days written notice to the Owner, its Managing Agents. Such cancellation clause shall have the wording "shall endeavor" and "but failure to do so shall impose no obligation or liability of any kind upon the insurer, its managing agents" deleted. Vendor's subcontractors shall be bound to Owner and its Managing Agents to the same extent Vendor is bound to Owner and its Managing Agents and shall provide upon request such certificates as set forth including all required endorsement forms. Vendor Agreement !Wetland Mitigation -Northwest Landscape Services Tarragon -Cedar River Corporate Park Page 15 of 17 EXHIBIT D INTERIM LIEK/CLAIM WAIVER From: Address: Contact Person: Contact Telephone: ------------- CONDITIONAL RELEASE The undersigned does hereby acknowledge that upon receipt by the undersigned of a check from the above referenced job in the sum of$ and when the check has been properly endorsed and has been paid by the bank upon which it was drawn. this document shall become effective to release pro tanto any and all claims, actions, and rights of lien arising from or related to the above referenced job. This reiease covers a progress payment for labor, services, equipment, materials furnished, and/or claims through (date) ____ _ and does not cover any retention or items furnished after that date. Before any recipient of this document relies on it said party should verify evidence of payment to the undersigned. I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER LAWS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON THAT THE ABOVE IS A TRUE AND CORRECT STATEMENT. Signature: Authorized Corporate Officer/Partner Title Dated this __ day of ________ ~ 2008 at: Subscribed and sworn before me day and year first above written: By: --------------- NotaryPublic for _____________ _ Vendor Agreement/Wetland Mitigation -Northwest Landscape Services Tarragon -Cedar River Corporate Park Project Name: Address: UNCONDITIONAL RELEASE The undersigned does hereby acknowledge that the undersigned has received progress payments in the sum of $ for labor, services, equipment or materials furnished to the above referenced job and hereby releases pro tanto any and all claims, actions, and rights of lien arising from or related to the above referenced job. The undersigned acknowledges full payment for all labor, services, equipment, materials furnished, and/or claims, actions, and rights of lien arising from or related to the ·above referenced job through (date) . This release does not cover any retention or items furnished after that date. NOTICE: TIDS DOCUMENT WAIVES RIGHTS UNCONDITIONALLY AND STATES THAT YOU HAVE BEEN PAID FOR GIVING UP THOSE RIGHTS. THIS DOCUMENT IS ENFORCEABLE AGAINST YOU IF YOU SIGN IT, EVEN IF YOU HAVE NOT BEEN PAID. IF YOU HA VE NOT BEEN PAID, USE A CONDITIONAL RELEASE FORM. I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER LAWS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON THAT THE ABOVE IS A TRUE AND CORRECT STATEMENT. Signature: Authorized Corporate Officer/Partner Title Dated this ___ day of ________ ~ 2008 at: Subscribed and sworn before me day and year first above written: By:----------------- Notary Public for _____________ _ Page 16of 17 EXHIBIT E WETLAND BUFFER MITIGATION PLAN (attached) VendrJr Agreement /Wetland Mitigation -Northwest Landscape Services Tarragon -Cedar River Corporate Park Page 17of 17 • Wetland Buffer Mitigation Plan 300 S. 160~H STREET Cedar River Corporate Park Parcel#: 3340400285 & 3023059083 RENTON, WASHINGTON Prepared for: Murphy M"Cullough Tarragon Development 1000 Second Avenue Suite 3200 Seattle, WA 98104 (206) 233-9600 ?repared by: CELESTE rOTHA ~ WVJTirAND PFiRMP''TTNG SEEVIOE.S 2025 South Norman Street (206) 328-7775 wps@isp.com April 16, 2007 Executive Summary This report presents a mitigation plan for buffer impacts resulting from proposed development of the 12.57-acre site, Parcels 3340400285 & 3023059083, is located between Lind Avenue South and East Valley Road, south of SW 19th Street in -Renton, Washington. SW 21•t Street is located to the north and SW 23m Street to the south; however, both of these street ROWs have been abandoned (Figlll'e 1, Vicinity Map) .. ~-. ~·· .,. ... !Dl-,.9Dontr . ''" Figure 1: Vicinity Map Site Description - ..,, "" "'' ...::_i 1~1 ············· ··~:·· .. P; . · .. ~ .. ---- ''" J ..,, The site is. cun·ently undeveloped. A fire station is located north of the northwest property corner (Parcel #3340400425), a co=ercial development is located to the east between the subject parcel and the East Valley Road; and a gas line is located on the parcel to the south, within the abandoned SW 23m Street ROW (Parcel# 3023059083). The parcel is nearly rectangular, with a "panhandle" at the northeast corner. · The site was filled prior to 1970 with from 7-to 10-feet of dense fill material. Scrubby trees and shrubs have since become established on the site. The southeast corner and a. narrow band around the entire site are forested. The interior of the site is mostly scrubby; tree species have generally not reached 20 feet or greater. Two mapped wetlands nearly surround the site; a large wetland lies to the north and a smaller wetland wraps around the east and south property boundary. These wetlands have been included in numerous previous inventories, including the City of Renton's Rivers, Streams & Wetlands • • inventory. An umiamed tributary of Springbrook Creek is located on the adjacent parcel to the south, south of the abandoned SW 23'd Street ROW. Proposed Impacts No impacts are proposed to wetlands on tl1e subject site. However, permanent impacts will occur from construction of two bio-filtration swales within tl1e buffers of Wetlands A and B, as shown on the storm drain plans. In addition, temporary impacts will result from the placement of an additional two to five feet of fill on the site. This will require some clearing within the buffer bec:,use some of the fill material will spill onto the wetland buffer along the south and east boundaries as well as north of the northern bio-filtration swale. Finally, rain gardens will be constructed witl'li.n the northem wetland buffer. All of these ai·eas are forested with deciduous trees averaging approximately l O inch DBH. Impacts are illustrated on Figure 2, rmKt page. Area totals for each type of impact are also shown below in Table 1: Table 1: Wetland Buffer Impacts Impact Type Impact Area Permanent Impacts (Biofiltration Swales) 3,729 SF Temporary Buffer Impacts 11,356 SF Rain Garden .12,307 SF ' Final Buffer Mitigation Plan The following mitigation plan is designed to mitigate for permanent impacts resulting from the biofiltration swales and for temporary impacts due to clearing and placement of additional fill material in wetland buffers. No mitigation is being required by the City of Renton for construction of the rain gardens within the buffer. Permanent impacts As described in the Conceptual Buffer Enhancement Plan prepared by WPS dated December 21, 2006, to compensate for pennanent impacts pursuant to the proposed bio- filtration swales within the buffers, the applicant is proposing to plant 400 conifer seedlings, i.e. 300 Douglas fir and 100 western red cedar, within the 31,169 square feet of onsite undisturbed buffer. The existing buffers are cun-ently nearly devoid of coniferous trees, so this proposal will result in a significant habitat improvement to the wetlands and buffers. The seedlings will be distributed randomly throughout the undisturbed buffers. Given tile existing vegetation to remain, the density· of trees that will be planted is disproportionately great because attrition is expected due to the impracticability of irrigation or other maintenance activities. No monitoring of tile plantings is practicable nor appropriate; it is aiiticipated that even if survivorship of as little as 3 0% of the total trees planted occurs, these trees will ultimately compensate for the total 3,729 square feet of pennanent buffer impact area. · ·' ..... ~ ,· I ' \, / -.~. / ·~ ....... Temporary impacts As noted above, temporary impacts will occur as a result of placement of additional fill material spilling into the buffer. Because this will bnry 1he roots of existing trees and shrubs, revegetation of these areas will be necessary. Construction Plan The following measures will be implemented to enll.l!D.ce survivorship of newly planted native species and to ensure that areas further down slope from the anticipated limits of construction are not affected. 1. In order to ensure that the implementation activities occur as intended, a pre- construction meeting will occur with the construction contractors and Vill'S prior to initiation of all construction activities. · 2. The limits .of construction will be established and marked by surveyors. 3. The project biologist will verify the construction limits in the field. 4. Two pai·allel silt fences will be installed, one at the limit of buffer impacts shown on the site· plan and another 5 feet further down slope in the wetland buffer. 5. Following installation of the silt fences, the temporary impact areas will be cleared. ' . ., 6. Grading of the bioswales and rain gardens will ·occur and the structural fill will be applied within the temporary impact areas and mechanically compacted. 7. An 8-to 12-inch layer of topsoil will be placed on top of the structural fill and lightly compacted prior to planting in temporary impact areas to enhance plant growth. 8. Planting will occur between 1he months. of October and February per the attached Wetland Buffer Mitigation Planting Plan preparnd by AHBL. 9. Following planting, 3 to 4 inches of "Animal Friendly Hog Fuel" (wood chips) obtained from Pacific Topsoils, or eql,\ivalent mulch will be applied throughout the temporary impact area to protect plants from weeds and to maintain soil moisture. · Care will taken to keep the mulch three inches from the stems of the plants to protect from insect and rodent damage. 10. Temporru·y drip irrigation capable of delivering at least 1 inch of water per week will be installed. 11. Five monitoring plots (i.e. five ai·eas planted according to the Typical Disturbed Wetland Buffer Planting legend shown on the Wetland Buffer Mitigation Planting Plan, attached) will be identified in the field with permanent markers and photographs talcen for comparison during monitoring events. 12. Permanent fencing will be installed and signs attached to fence posts at approximately 50-foot spacing along the buffer. Signs will be constructed of metal and state "Sensitive Area: Please protect and care for this area. Alteration or Disturbance is Prohibited by Law". · 13: Mitigation measures will be implemented as needed to rectify any unauthorized construction impacts. · 14. The first silt fence will be removed after one year and then a year later, the· other, down slope silt fence, will be removed during the 3rd quarter maintenance visits. Planting Plan Fallowing clearing, native 1rees and shrubs will be planted according to the attached Wetland Buffer Mitigation Planting Plan prepared by AHBL. Plant numbers, sizes and composition of grmmd covers are sho'WD. in Table 2. Plant spacing will be irregular and random per the planting plan. This will result in a totalof 453 shrubs and 99 trees being planted within the t=porary buffer impacts area. 704 hardy ground covers will also be planted per the planting plan. In addition, 40 0 conifer tree seedlings will be planted within the undisturbed buffer. Table 2: Planting Schedule within Wetland Buffer Areas ----,_ ____ ---Temporary Impact Area Common Name Botanical Name Number Size Trees Red alder A/nus rubre 15 1 gal. Bitter cherry Prunus emarginata 41 2 gal. Douglas fir Pseudotsuga menzeisli 20 2 gal. Cascara Rhemnus purshiana 23 2 gal. Shrubs Vine maple Acer c/rcinatum 23 2 gal. Tall Oregon grape Mahonia a quifo/ium 68 1 gal. Indian plum -Oemleria cerasiformis 68 1 gal. · Red-!lowertng currant Ribes sanguineum 45 1 gal. Nootka rose Rosa nutkana 68 1 gal. Red elderberry Sambucus racemosa 68 1 gal. Douglas spirea Spiraea doug/asii 68 1 gal. Snowberry Symphoricarpos a/bus 45 1 gal. Ground Covers .. Salal Gaul/her/a shallon 227 1 gal. Low Oregon grape Mahon/a nervosa 273 1 gal. Sword!ern Polystlohum mun/tum · 204 1 gal. Permanent Impact Areas. (within undisturbed buffer) Trees Douglas fir Pseudotsuga menzeisii 300 Seedlings . Western red cedar Thuja p/ioata 100 Seedlings Performance Standards When evaluated against monitoring data, performance standards are used to. determine the . relative success of the mitigation project. Failure to meet these general minimum standards throughout the monitoring period will result in implementation of contingency measures. As noted above, because attrition is expected, planting density is exaggerated due to the impracticability of irrigation or other maintenance activities within the undisturbed buffer pl.U'suant to mitigation for permanent bioswale impacts. Performance standards for the temporary impacts buffer enhanceme11t area are shown below in Table 3. When evaluated against monitoring data, perfonnance standards are used to determine the relative success of the mitigation project. Failure to meet these general minimum standards throughout the monitoring period will l'esult in compulsory implementation of contingency measures. Table 3: Performance Standards Criterion Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Native plant cover (%) 10 -20 Native woody plant cover (%) (for forested or 1 O -20 scrub-shrub areas) 20 -30 . 30 -70 20-30 40-60 Non-native, invasive plant cover(%) Plant survivorship Species diversity Species diversity (see below) (see below) (see below) Year 4 . Year 5 70-90 100 60 -80 80 -85 'The following minimum standards apply to species diversity of native plants, including both planted and volunteer species, within.the various strata: · • trees = 4 species, at least 1 of which must be coniferous • shrubs = 5 species •-ground cover = 2 species · Plant survivorship Plants are considered "dead" when more than 50% of the plant is decadent, with the exception of cottonwood, willow and red osier dogwood, which will be considered live if any part of the plant is living. Control of noxious, invasive and native species with a tendency to overwhelm Noxious weeds (identified on state noxious weeds lists) including giant and Japanese knotweeds (Polygonum sa;halinense, P. cuspidatum) must be enti.J:e!y and properly eliminated, a11d disposed of, from the site prior to installation, and throughout the monitoring period. Reed canarygrass (;Phalaris arundinaceae), Scot's broom (Cytisus.scoparius), English ivy (Hedera helix), creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens), and Himalayan and evergreen blackberries (Rubus discolor, R. laciniatus), must be eliminated prior to pJ.anting and thereafter strictly controlled and may not exceed 10% total cover per species (i.e., up to 10% cover of each species may be allowed) throughoutthe monitoring period. (Note: exception for reed canarygrass in areas with s=oTu,ding dense stands of reed canarygrass and dense mats of English ivy and creeping buttercup. In such cases, the objective is to provide habitat diversity with woody species by the end of the monitoring period;. tln·ee foot diameter planting holes will be cleared of all weeds prior to planting. Fences and Signs Fence.s and signs will be inspected during the maintenance visits and must be in good repair. Monitoring No monitoring of the seedling tree plantings within the undisturbed buffer area is practicable nor appropriate; it is anticipated that even if survivorship of as little as 3 0% of the total trees planted occurs, these trees will ultimately compensate for the total 3,729 square feet of permanent buffer impact area Within the temporary impact/mitigation area monitoring shall continue for a minim.um period of five years of successful monitoring, i.e. monitoring meeting tl1e pe1iormance standards. An as-built drawing showing five (5) randomly-selected areas planted according to the "Typical Disturbed Wetland Buffer Planting" (shown on the Planting Plan prepared by AHBL) will be prepared within one month of completion of planting. Thereafter monitoring will commence on the next quarter according to the schedule below. Monitoring will consist of a dire.ct plant count withm these areas. Overview photos will be talce.n from the same vantage points each year to document overall appearance of the mitigation area before, during, and after construction, as well as of each of the sample plots. Photo points and sample plots shall be marked with stalces to facilitate relocation from one monitoring event to . the next. Specifically, the monitoring protocol will consist of the following: • Evaluate plant cover and cover from undesirable species within the typical planting areas; • Evaluate survivorship through a direct plant count within typical planting areas; • Visually assess and record wildlife use. • Inspect all fences and. signs Maintenance, monitoring and reporting will occur per the following schedule: Table 4: Maintenance & Monitoring Sc,hedules Year Maintenance Visits MonftorinQ Reoortdue 1 Between Januai:y 1 imd March 1 AND Between Januai:y 1 and March 1 AND March 30 Between Aprfl 1 and June 1 AND Between Aprfl 1 and June 1 AND June 30 Between July 1 and September 30 Between July 1 and September 30 October 30 Between Oclobar 15 and December 30 Between October 15 and December 30 Januai:y 31 2-5 Between April 1 and June 1 AND Between September 1 and October 15 December 30 Between July 1 and September 30 Maintenance Plan Over the monitoring period, a rigorous quarterly maintenance program will be im.pl=ented as shown on Table 4 to eliminate undesirable plants .and to protect shrubs and small trees from competition from weeds, repair or replace any buffer signage, replace dead plants, etc. Only organic feiiilizers and chemicals will be used for maintenance purp·oses in the buffer. • •• Examples of these include: com glnten, Sluggo, Burnout Organic weed ldller, Sharp Shooter organic insect killer, Perfect Blend Organic Fertilizer, and Essential Biostimulant. Chemicals will be applied by a licensed applicator. Fertilizer will be applied after the first year of planting and each yeru· thereafter b the fall. Contingency Flan In· order to provid~ for the contingency that performance standards may not be met during the five-year monitoring period, it may be necessary to provide supplemental plantings. Plant attrition can be remedied by evaluating the cause, and replanting with the same or a more appropriate and approved species. The landscaping contractor will guarantee 10 D percent survivorship for one year from initial pianting for losses due to defects in materials or w011ananship. All plants that are used for replacement must meet the standards of the initial plantings. The causes of any mortality wili be evaluated, and based upon the results of this evaluation, alternate species selection may occur. Replacement will be subject to the same conditions· and be made in the same manner as specified for the original planting. Mitigation Surety The City 6f;Renton requires two surety devices: an installation device in the amount of 150% · of the contracted cost of installation, and a maintenance security device in the amount of 125% of the contracted cost for maintenance and monitoring. The contracts must clearly state that structures, improvements and mitigation will perform satisfactorily for a minimum period of five yeats. Signed contracts for these services and a maintenance security device will be provided to the city prior to issuance of a fill and grade permit. Report Limitations Work for this project was performed, and this report prepared for, Tarrngon Development, in accordance -with generally accepted professional practices. A Firm Qualifications Statement for WPS is provided in Appendix 1. This report is not meant to represent a legal opinion. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. · • • .APPENDIX 1: FIRM QUALIFICATIONS STATEMENT • e Delineation Mitigation pianning and monitoring© Linear projects (roade 1 power and gas lines) e Environmental oomp1iance during· construction 0 Peer review and permit conditioning 0 Wetland inventories ©· 0 ~econnaissanoe evaluations a Permit assistance and agency ooo:rdination I!! P.t;o;fessional report preparation ~ !rnpaot analysis and sequenoin; WETJ,AND PERMITTING Phone: (206) 328-7775 Fa>:: [206) 320-7779 Cell: (206) 240-203 wps@i~p.com STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS Wetland Penni tting Services {WPS) is a fnm that specializes in wetlands consulting and permitting assistance. Thefn'm was established by Celeste Botha as CBWE in February 1992. It has been awarded Women Business Enterprise (\VBE) certification in Washington State. In addition to wetlands stt1dies, WPS provides habitat and small streams consulting services. A description of WPS' s expenence is outlined in the following sections. Wetlands Botha has bee11 a full-time constlltant since 1988, with major work emphasis 011 wefiands ecology, identification, inventory, delineation, assessments, mitigation and permitting. She has conducted well over 1,000 wetland delineations and assessments, primariiy in Washington, but also in Orego11, California, Alaska and New York, and has written at least 300 technical reports describing investigation results. She is a US Anny Corps of Engineers Certified Wetland De!ineator. Ms. Botlta co-taught the Wetland Identification and Delineation course for the Wetland Certification Program at the University of Washington for three years, from 1997 through 1999. Ms. Bofo~ was Secretary of the Pacific Northwest Chapter of the Society of Wetland Scientists, the nation's largest chapter, for three years :from 1994 through 1996 .. Ms. Botha was on the Board of Directors of the Sodety for Ecological Restoration Northwest ftom May 2004 through May 2006. Her knowledge of wetlands parameters is detailed below. Pel'lllitting · Assistance Wetland Delineation Since 1988, assisted public and private clients to meet local, state and federal wetlands, streams, and shorelands requirements to deveiop properties. These have included SEP A Determinations of Non-Significance (DNS) and Environmental Impact Statements {EIS), NEPA (EIS), Secti011 404 general authorizations and individual permits an·ct Sectio11 401 Water Quality Ce1iifications, Shorelines Management Act (SMA) permits, Hydraulic Permit Approvals (HP A), King County Sensitive Areas Ordinance (SAO), Pierce and Snohomish County ordinance compliance, as well as numerous otlier state, county and city wetl!jllds and stream ordinances. Delineated wetlands and prepared technical reports on hundreds of acres in Washington, Oregon, California, Alaska, and New York, including many disturbed, atypical and problem area evaluations. 2025 s. Norman street Seattle, WA 98144 Vegetation Soils Hydrology Peer Review Environmental Inspections Functional Assessments Ecological Restoration Mitigation Monitoring Project · Management GPS Training . ~ Bachelor of Science in Botany from University of Washington, 1974. Common and scientific names of over 300 plant species. Academic and practical soils training, at Oregon State University and while employed with the USDA Soil Conservation Service. Hydric Soils Identification training. Twelve yeaTS experience with hydric soils identification. · Established and conducted several water-table fluctuation studies, including a 2-year study 011160 acres of sugar cane in the Everglades Agricultural Area, Florida; a project monitoring 12 strategically-placed wells on sites in Renton, Kent and Auburn for 10 months; and a site in Redmond with 8 wells for 3 months. Devised protocol for monitoring and evaluated 2 years of well data for a site in Auburn. Provided permit review assistance for compliance with sensitive area regulations to Pierce County Planning and Land Services and IGng County, Department of Development and Environmental Services; the City of Newcastle; the City of Sammamish; the City of Duvall; and the City of Federal Way, Washington. Provided environmental inspection services during constmction of a $7.2 million tra11s11i.ission line upgrade in King County, to ensure · · compliance with all. permit requirements including Best Management Practices and King County Surface Water Design Manual guidelines, particularly during constructiou in wetlands; inspected construction of roads projects for King County for compliance with clearing and grading permit conditions. Certified .by USFWS in Habitat Evaluation Procedure (HEP) in Anchorage in 1991; trained by Bob Hruby (principal author) in the 2004 Washington Department of Ecology wetland rating system February 2005. Four years in the nursery and landscaping industry, Peace Corps volunteer teaching agriculture, soil conservationist, and currently wetlands consultant --these career elements have created a unique and synergistic perspective on ecological restoration. As a wetlands consultant, Ms. Botha has worked with landscape designers to develop detailed mitigation plans for several major and mm1y smaller projects m1d has created several small mitigation plans in-house. Monitored projects for compliance with performance stm1dards, including Clark Lake Buffer Enhancement project; numerous WSDOT ·projects, dozens of projects for Pierce County, Washington, Mohawk Plastics project, and Talbot-Benydale Transmission Line. · Project manager for wetlands component on more than 75 projects involving management and direction of associates, including most of those described in this qualifications statement. Fifteen years professional-level work directing support personnel. Certificated by Corvallis Microtechnology (CMT), May 2001. Retrained November 2004 and utilized GPS on Midland Wetlm1d Inventory for Pierce County, WA. • • REPRESENTATIVE LOCAL PROJECTS REGULATORY PEER REVIEW Regulatory Review, Cities of Kent, Duvall, Newcastle, Covington and Sammamish, Washington. On-call peer review and permit assistance. Provided the City of Newcastle with peer review and permit assistance as their on-call wetland specialist on all development proposals witl1 wetlands and/or streams issues since inco:poration in 1995 and the City of Duvall since 1997. Environmental Biologist, Pierce County, Washington. Acted as a staff biologist on a part-time, temporary basis for Pierce County Planning & Land Services, March through May 2000, September 2001 t1n·ough January 2003, and July through Sept=ber 2003. King County Senior Ecologist; King County Department of Development and Environmental Services; King County, Washington. As a Senior Ecologist on temporary contract from May. 1994 through.Dec=ber 1995, responsible for wetlands regulatory review of Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) highway projects within the county, and King County Public Works Roads projects. Verification of wetland delineations and impacts assessments, participation in public hearings, coordination with WSDOT on permit review, assistance with streams permitting issues, review and siguificant input to mitigation proposals, and permit conditioning. King County Public Works projects included: Issaqual1-Hobart Road at Tiger Mountain Road, 68th Street, 241stAve SE, Juanita/Woodinville Road, 140th to 148fu, Avondale Road Phase 2, 128th to 132nd Avenue NE, SE 20 8th Street, SE 240th Street, 272nd/277th Street. WSDOTprojects included: SR 169; SR 18, 312th to 304th; SR 18, 304th to Hwy 516; SR 18, Hwy 516to Hwy 169; SR 18, Green River to 312th; SR 18, Issaquah Hobart Road; SR 203 at 77th; SR 2 at Deception Pass; SR900 at May Valley Road; SR 516 Mitigation; SR405 at 160th; SR 520 at Avondale Road. · WETLAND DELINEATION, MITIGATION PLANNING AND TECHNICAL REPORTING; VARIOUS CLIENTS, WASHINGTON STATE. Delineated wetlands, prepared mitigation plans anc prepared technical reports on hundreds of acres in Washington, too numerous to list. Some examples are: Cedar River Corporate Park, Renton, Washington. Delineated wetlands and prepared conceptual mitigation plan on 12.57 acre site. Wetland Inventory; Midland area of Pierce County. Evaluated 372 parcels and delineated wetlands using GPS for inclusion on the County's GIS inventory. Entered data on each pa.reel into tl1e County's permitting database. Whidbey Naval Air Station, Department of Defense, Whidbey Island, Washington. Base- wide wetland delineations of complex, disturbed site. · Ross Island Sand and Gravel, Klickitat County, Eastern Washington. Delineated and prepared technical report on an approximately 3 5 0-acre proposed gravel exb:action site. Mohawk Plastics Wetlands Studies & Permitting Assistance; Auburn, Washington. Conducted detailed wetlands investigation 011 7.5-acre site with relict hydric soils to delineate wetlands. Coordinated with the city of Auburn and the Corps of Engineers to obtain a Section 404 individual permit to fill 0.3 acres of jurisdictionally adjacent wetlands. Performed an impact and ftmctiona:l value analysis, and developed a mitigation plan to compensate for wetlands impacts. Mitigation constructed in March 2002. Completed Years I, II and III monitoring ruid prepared monitoring reports. PUGET SOUND ENERGY (LINEAR) PROJECTS • Snohoinish 8-inch Gas Line Upgrade, Snohomish County 2003 -2004: Delineated wetlands along 3-mile long, 150-foot wide. con·idor; coordinating with surveyors to map wetlands. Prepared report for pem1it submittal. Bothell to Sammamish Transmission Line Upgrade, Snohomish and King Counties, numerous cities -ongoing: Delineated wetlands along a 13+mile long, 100-foot wide power corridor; coordinating with surveyors to map wetlands. Assisted with permitting; provided environmental compliance services during construction. Talbot-Berrydale Transmission Line Upgrade, King County, Washington, 1996 -2003 EIS Wetlands Studies: Managed wetlands and wildlife studies along a 7.5 mile long, 100-foot wide transmission line right-of.way. Delineation, classification, evaluation of all wetlands along tlie route, · impact assessment of installation of new towers and lines, as well as removal of old poles and lines. Preparation of detailed wetlands report and EIS text, Supervised staff biologists and administered contractual issues. Coordinated with King County and Puget Power. Developed conceptual mitigation plan for project impacts. Monitored mitigation. Reports and Permitting ABsistance: Developed fmal reports addressing vegetative screening for aesthetic impacts; loss of forested wetland habitat; temporary access wetland and stream impacts and · mitigation from construction; and fmal wetland mitigation planning. Obtained King County grading permit, Corps Nationwide authorization, HPA and 401 Certifications. Environmental Compliance: On-site inspections with oversight autl10rity to enforce decisions related to environmental compliance throughout construction of the project involving installation of 56 huge steel monopole structures, 7 of which were placed within wetlands. Mitigation Monitoring: Monitored areas for natural regeneration and, in areas replanted as mitigation, monitored for compliance for 3 years. Wetland Delineation, Permit Assistance, Mitigation Planning; Smaller Projects, Puget Sound Energy, . Washington. Delineated wetlands within Yakima.River floodplain for Kittitas Natural Gas Pipeline, Pickering Transmission Line, Blake Island Cable Replacement, Marysville 8" High Pressure pipeline, Mourrt Si Substation, Sahalee 12" STW HP supply main, SR 525/Classic Road transmission line, White River Substation, Union Hill Snbstation. Delineated wetlands, prepared teclmica[ report, assisted with pe1mit assistance and developed mitigation pians since 1992. PROJECTS OUTSIDE OF WASIITNGTON STATE Wetlmids'Specialist, Wetlands Study, Yukon Gold Ice Pad (LGL Alaska Research Associates); Staines River Area, North Slope, Alaska. Conducted wetlands determination and qualitative assessment of tundra surrounding an oil exploration and drilling ice platform, and wrote techuical rep01i describing findings. Wetland Delineation; Empire Pipeline, Upstate New York (Woodward-Clyde Consultants). Delineated wetlands within 200-feet along ilie pipeline ROW. Wetlands Studies, Main Bay Fish Hatchery Expansion, Main Bay, Alaska. Performed wetland delineations and habitat characterizations, and prepared technical report for a proposed fish hatchery expansion. April 17, 2007 ------------------------ ... ~y 0 (;~;..¢) tt *"" ;*'; DenisLaw,Mayor f"N'l'O July 28, 2008 Charlie Foushee Tarragon Development 1000 2"' Ave Ste #3200 Seattle, WA 98104 CIT-T OF RENTON Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator Subject: 1'' and 2"' Quarter Wetland Maintenance and Monitoring Reports Cedar River Corporate Park City of Renton File LUA06-l 72 Dear Mr. Fraser: This letter is to inform you that on June 30'" l received the first and second quarterly monitoring reports for the wetland mitigation project at Cedar River Corporate Park. The project appears to be meeting performance standards, however, all recommendations on page 6 of the report should be undertaken as soon as possible, specifically, the removal of blackberries within the mitigation area. The third quarterly monitoring report should include a follow up statement that the recommendations have been completed. Two copies of the third quarterly monitoring report are to the City by September 30, 2008. !fyou have any questions I can be reached at ( 425) 430-7219. Sincerely, ;, J' -../7 " 11 / :r /' "--~i.:_,; .·· . -,ex;-J#..u'-. -. -' p , ...... __ ocale Timmons Planning Division cc: 'Otyofllenlon File No. LUA06>162 Celeste Botha -------l-0-55_S_o_u_th_G_r-ad_y_W_a_y ___ R_e_nt_or_1,-\\-'a-s-hi-ngt-on_9_80_5_7 ______ ~ @ Th1spapercont;;a1ns 50~:. recycled material, 30%postconsumer AHEAD OF THF. CURVE YEAR l EARLY SUMMER BUFFER. [NHAN('.IMlNI MONITOR.ING ftEPOR.T CEDAR lt!VlH. (~ORl'ORATE PARK l'IUJ';\RlD roR.: Cl lAIZLIL FOUSHEE TARR:\G1__1'-i DEVELOPMENI 1000 ,Fc1__,'<D A VENUE ,CLJl lT 3200 ,CI.\ITLI, WA 98104 (206) 213·9600 l'IUl'ARED BY: uu.<11 BOTHA \\VJe:$ WETI ANR PFRM[CUNG SF\BYICES ·1-0"/ 5 South Nonnan S1:reet Se.it tl~, Wa!!1hl11gton ~1.4-4 (106) 318-7775 wp~i.sp.cont ]UNL 30, 2008 JUt; I. EXECUTIVE SUMMAR.Y The Cedar River Corporate Park site is located east of Lind Avenue SW, as shown in Figure 1. A Wetland Buffer Mitigation Plan, dated April 16, 2007, was prepared by WPS. The plan was approved by the City of Renton and implementation was completed on February 13, 2008. The Year 1 Spring Monitoring report was completed on June 5, 2008. This report represents the monitoring results obtained on June 26, 2008. I \ + -===-=""'' "' FlGURE 1: VICINllY MAP Although the approved plan calls for an as-built that includes monitoring five "Typical Disturbed Wetland Buffer Planting" areas as shown on the planting plans, a revised as-built including precise locations of plants located within the enhanced buffer areas on the date of the Year 1 Early Summer monitoring event, as well as tables showing survivorship was prepared by WPS. This report presents a summary of enhancement measures, goals, a description of the approved and actual monitoring protocol, performance standards, results of the monitoring effort and recommendations for accomplishing mitigation goals. 2. MITIGATION GOALS & OBJECTIVES The goal of the mitigation plan was to compensate for permanent impacts resulting from the biofrltration swales and for temporary impacts due to clearing and placement of additional fill material in wetland buffers. A total of 453 shrubs and 99 trees were specified within the temporary buffer impacts area. 704 hardy ground covers were also planted per the planting plan. In addition, 400 conifer tree seedlings were planted within the undisturbed buffer; per the approved plan, no monitoring of the seedling tree plantings within the undisturbed buffer area has been or will be performed. 3. PER.FOR.MANCE STANDARDS Performance standards are shown below in Table 1. 2 TABLE 1: PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Criterion Native plant cover(%) Native woody plant cover (%) (for forested or scrub-shrub areas) Non-native, invasive plant cover(%) Plant survivorship Species diversity \·cc, 1 Year 2 10 -20 20-30 10-20 20-30 (see below) (see below) (see below) Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 30-70 70-90 100 40-60 60-80 80 -85 ----------------"'~---·"'---·------------------- 3./ SFEC!E'i DIVER.5/D The following minimum standards apply to species diversity of native plants, including both planted and volunteer species, within the various strata: • trees= 4 species, at least 1 of which must be coniferous • shrubs= 5 species • ground cover:::: 2 species 3.2PLANTSUR VIVORS/-IIF Survivorship is not a viable long-term measure of success as compared to percent cover of a diversity of native plants; however, 100% survivorship is guaranteed by the landscaping contractor for the first year after installation. Plants are considered "dead" when more than 50% of the plant is decadent, with the exception of cottonwood, willow and red osier dogwood, which will be considered live if any part of the plant is living. 3.3 CONTROL OF NOXIOUS & INVASIVE SPECIE" Noxious weeds (identified on state noxious weeds lists) including giant and Japanese knotweeds (Polygonum sachalinense, P. cuspidatum) must be entirely and properly eliminated, and disposed of, from the site prior to installation, and throughout the monitoring period. Reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinaceae), Scot's broom (Cytisus scoparius), English ivy (Hedera helix), creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens), and Himalayan and evergreen blackberries (Rubus discolor, R. laciniatus), may not exceed 10% total cover per species (i.e., up to 10% cover of each species may be allowed) throughout the monitoring period up to a total of no greater than 20% cover from invasive species. 3. 4 FENCES AND 5iCNS Fences and signs will be inspected during the maintenance visits and must be in good repair- 4. APPROVED MONITORING PROTOCOL The city approved the monitoring protocol described herein. Within the temporary impact/mitigation area monitoring shall continue for a minimum period of five years of successful monitoring, i.e. monitoring meeting the performance standards. An as-built drawing showing five /5) randomly-selected areas planted according to the "Typical Disturbed Wetland Buffer Planting" 3 Year 1 2-5 {shown on the Planting Plan prepared by AHBL/ will be prepared within one month of completion of planting. Thereafter monitoring will commence on the next quarter according to the schedule in Table 2. Monitoring will consist of a direct plant count within these areas. Overview photos will be taken from the same vantage points each year to document overall appearance of the mitigation area be/are, during, and after construction, as well as of each of the sample plots. Photo points and sample plots shall be marked with stakes to facilitate relocation from one monitoring event to the next. Specifically, the monitoring protocol will consist of the following: • Evaluate plant cover and cover from undesirable species within the typical planting areas; • Evaluate survivorship through a direct plant count within typical planting areas; • Visually assess and record wildlife use. • Inspect of/ fences and signs Maintenance, monitoring and reporting will occur per the following schedule: TABLE 2: MONITORING & MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE Maintenance Visits Between January 1 and March 1 AND Between April 1 and June 1 AND Between July 1 and September 30 Between October 15 and December 30 Between April 1 and June 1 AND Between July 1 and September 30 Monitoring Between January 1 and March 1 AND Between April 1 and June 1 AND Between July 1 and September 30 Between October 15 and December 30 Between September 1 and October 15 Report due March 30 June 30 October 30 January 31 December 30 However, the landscaping contractor installed additional plants to account for attrition that occurred between the February 2008 installation and the June 5, 2008 Year 1 Spring monitoring event. As can be seen in Table 3, below, some plant substitutions occurred. Therefore, a total plant count was conducted again to document locations of plants installed between the Spring and the Early Summer monitoring events. 5. MONITORING R.ESUL.TS The Early Summer monitoring event occurred on June 26, 2008. A summary of monitoring results listing the quantities of each planted species and the actual number located on June 26, 2008 is shown in Table 3: Monitoring Results Summary TableTable 3. Results relative to Performance Standards are provided in Table 4. Detail sheets showing locations of plants are provided in Appendix 1. Detailed tables listing plants located within each of the detail sheets is provided in Appendix 2. Photographs of the enhanced buffer area are provided in Appendix 3. Plant Trees A/nus rubra Prunus virginiana Pseudotsuga menzeisii _ -~~~~'!_US pur~~~~'.1...~---.. Shrubs Acer circinatum TABLE 3: MONITORING RESULTS SUMMARY TABLE Red alder Bitter cherry Douglas fir Cascara Vine maple ·1bol RA BC DF C Quantity Specified 15 41 20 23 ····--··--------~- VM 23 4 Quantity Located 13 43 19 28 22 % Survivorship 86.67% 104.88% 95.00% 121.74% -· ·--·---·-· ·-·--·~ 95.65% Berberis aquifo/ium Tall Oregon grape TOG Oemleria cerasiformis Indian plum IP Ribes sanguineum Red-flowering currant RFC Rosa nutkana Nootka rose NR Sambucus racemosa Red elderberry RE Spiraea douglassii Douglas spirea OS Symphoricarpos a/bus Snow berry SN R_ubus parviflorus•_ Thimble_berry TB Groundcovers Berberis nervosa Short Oregon grape OG Gau/theria shallon Salal s Blechnum spicant** Deer fern FD Polystichum munitum western sword fern SF Total Ferns: Grand Total: ~~-~---------c.c._ *Volunteer """Substitute for SF 68 68 45 68 68 68 45 0 273 227 0 204 204 1256 60 69 35 76 42 71 46 4 183 182 24 177 201 1094 88.24% 101.47% 77.78% 111.76% 61.76% 104.41% 102.22% 67.03% 80.18% 98.53% 87.10% TABLE 4: MONITORING RESULTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE STANDARDS: YEAR 1-EARLY SUMMER 2008 Critedon Native plant cover(%) Native woody plant cover(%) Non-native, invasive plant cover(%): Noxious weeds Reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinaceae) Scot's broom (Cytisus scoparius) English ivy (Hedera helix) Creeping buttercup (Ronunculus repens) Himalayan blackberry (Rubus procerus) Evergreen blackberry /R. /aciniotus) Plant survivorship Species diversity Trees Shrubs Ground covers Fences & Signs ----·---·· -·-··-· Standard 10-20% 10-20% 0% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 100% 4 8 3 Good repair Actual 8% 7% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 5% 0% 87.1% 4 9 4 Good repair The percent cover estimate provided in Table 4 is an average of the entire enhancement area; some areas have greater than the estimated 7% but others have less, as can be seen in the photographs shown in Appendix 3. The causes of attrition include the lack of adequate irrigation (which is currently provided through irrigation of perimeter plantings, which has proved to be spotty and ineffective), and predation from birds, specifically crows and geese. 5 6. RECOMMENDATIONS To ensure that the project comes into full compliance, we recommend the following measures: • Adhere strictly to the maintenance schedule provided in Section 4. • Blackberries were not successfully grubbed within the undisturbed buffer area; landscapers should re- grub blackberries within badly infested areas and also throughout the buffer enhancement area. • All thistles and other herbaceous weeds should be removed entirely and immediately from both the enhanced and undisturbed buffer areas and disposed of at an approved site to prevent seed dispersal. • Install a temporary irrigation system and establish an irrigation schedule that provides a minimum of 1 inch of water per week. • Because additional attrition will doubtless occur should additional plants be installed during the summer, plant replacement should be deferred until after October 30, 2008. Plant replacement will be based on late summer results, according to the schedule provided in Table 2. Replacement planting locations shall be designed to compensate in areas of low plant cover, such as the areas shown in Photographs 12 and 13, Appendix 3. Where predation of groundcovers from crows and geese has been heavy, substitute with shrubs. 7. REPOR. T LIMITATIONS The information contained herein is, to our knowledge, correct and accurate. We are not responsible for the accuracy of information provided by others. Within the limitations of schedule, budget, and scope-of-work, we warrant that this study was conducted in accordance with generally accepted environmental science practices, including the technical guidelines and criteria in effect at the time of this study. The results and conclusions of this report represent the authors' best professional judgment based upon information provided by the project proponent and information obtained during the course of this study. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. Signed: Celeste Botha 6 APPENDIX !: DETAIL SHEETS JUNE 26, 2008 7 NOTE: PLANTS LOCATED ON DETAIL SHEETS S -1 THROUGH S -6, AND E -1 THROUGH E -3 ARE PLANTED WITHIN THE ENHANCEMENT AREA LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE INDICATED PARKING STALL. PLANTS LOCATED ON SHEETS N -1 THROUGH N -4 ARE LOCATED IN THE APPROXIMATE ORDER SHOWN . . ~- · ,r "")O'&W ,<·,ro~ c:r}:;r:c.,~.c:c 'I), ,,c~Q,,fiJ:Y . J; s~et .N: 1 : Sh-~. 2 Sheet N • 3 , . {i;SheefN} , J .. ·,r-- ~ f ,f ' I -r , 1 •...___.___-· \ } l_., i I • ) ---, ---. .i ' ' i:.=_J I i r---> \, \._ •', ., __ _ ,(-, ,/I ' 1 ~ [I __J l c/-r, 1, /1 . I '~: Sh~~· ,_ '. r::r-·iJ (I · :3 ~I -::1 1; ' I ' I . . . . I r· . She~E~2: (.) ~ lT~ 1 ·,;:· 1 ;:,, !J I She~E~1. ,J 1/rl ;--,1,·!I; ,'\-· ) ... i:· '· L...-\. -·--~ I ' ·, ~------...J I • __ J l I I '\ I Sheet~,-_1 _ f~heet S -2 /l Sheet !i 3 ~~ S -4 , i -_Sheet_s_-5 A' SI\••",' 6 -<·XJ•;' ---;a:-,.w,: ,,,,..'c(k;:-.r,,s;-rJ-.?,. '",OS: .CO ,;.,c,<>-r1'-'; ;c·r.:-c,_ .d:] c:,ce,>J C,dl~') CU(""""":T , .. :,-v-::z .. -fl'Tl..,q.;,< . ~ ~-;I. ~"4,.~) ,v··~ 'i!~hi ... ... w-, Overview As-Built and Monitoring Map mmm11= ~'111Dlll CEDAR l<iVEI< CORPORATE PARK ~) ll /,I // /,/ ' -a, a, .c: U) sat ·s 1: '. I 'I : I I' I I I I co 0 0 N .. Cl) E E ::I (/) 2' .. co w s E 0 e- 0 0 .. Cl) -~ a:: .. co "C Cl) 0 II la l S l 'cJN £ ,,,,~ I ,,,, I ,, ,,,,~ ',,,,, ,,,,,, '''''''" (p8SS9JjS l) :H:J S '801 S ,,,,,,,, ''''''J ,,,,,, ,,,,,, di L 'VIJA , '::JS£ ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, '' ,, ''' ,. ,,,,,,,, ::IS 1: '80 L 'di £ ''' '''' '\ ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, 80l ,,,,,,,1 ,,,,,,, 'di l '.::JS L 'VcJ L ,,,,,,, I ,,-._ ,, co SB~~'. ~ 0 :JS S '80 1: I 0 ·so z ·:::i ::1<:J L -' ,,1 N ,,,,,,,. ... ,,,,,,,, Cl) 80 L ''''''" E 'S c;; ':)::JcJ L '::J L ,,,,,,, E ,,,,,,,, :J ,,,,,,,,, (/) ,,,,,,,,. ~ ,,,,,,,,. I NS l 'St, ] ,,,,,,,,, CV ',,,,,,, w ,, ,,,,,,, Cl) I S L ,, ,,,,,,, -i 'NS l ':itl L 'cJN l ' ,,,,,,, I I! ,,,,,,, 0 ,,,,,,,,, Q. ;, ''''''''' ... /I :) l '801 l 'cJN L ':JS£ ,,,,,,,, I 0 .-Y' N ' ,,,,,,, 0 ,.. ' ,,,,,,, ... ti') ,,,,,,,,· Cl) 3<:J 1: ':) L ,,,,,,, -~ -'80l ':JS l V'JA L Ii ,,,,,,, et: Q) Q) (fr ',,,,,, ... ',,,,,, CV .c: :JS 2: '80 l ,, ti') 'VIJA L 'di L ,,,,,, Cl) ~ ,,,,,,, 0 ¢=Jz 80 £ ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, 'di l ':JS£ 'SO L ,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,, I ,,,,,,,, :)::JcJ 2: ,,,,,,,, 'S'(] l ''v'cl l '80 1: ''''' '' '\ I \ ,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,, \ ,,,,,,,,, 80 l 'St, '"'""'I '\ ,,,,,,,,, )) " ,,,,,,,, ',,,,,,,, S £ ':)8 L ,,,,,,,, __.._JI ,,,,,,,,· ,,,,,,,,,. ,,,,,,,,· lj I _J J ~ 1 I J Cl) -Q) Q) .c: Cl) V\1/\ , 'S 9 'NS , ,,,,,. ,,,,,, ''''''\ ------+--~~!lli!t''''''' ,,,,,,, S I' 'NS , ':)8 , 't!N £ ::IS , 'sa , '::>:JI:! , '80 C: ,,,,,,,. ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,~ ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,, ,,,,,,, ,,,,,,, ''''''' ,,,,,,, ,,,,,,, ___,....,.."",''' ''' '. ~,, ,,,,,,,, ,,·0 ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, '"" '''''''" ''" '''''''1~ '"' ,,, ''''''' •------,,-.ii,'~",-:.;"''''''' ,,,,,,,, ss ':)8 , '''''''" ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, ~'''''''j ,,,,,,, ,,,,,,, ''''''' ,,,,,,,, f->,,'-" '\. ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ,,,,,,,; ______ ...,.., .... ~~"''''''' '''' ''' ,, ''''' ',: ,,,,,,, (passaJJs , ) :31:l i, '801 Z ::> , 80 , 001, '90 G WA , :JS £ ,,,,,,,'>$ '''''''" ,,,,,,,.., ,,,,,,,, '''''''l ------~~~~~~~~~~~~/ ,,,,,, 80 G 'di£ ':JS£ '\.'' \.' ,,,,, '''''' :JO , 'NS G ·90 c: '::J s £ ·so £ S 9 NSZ ( I ~ I I I I I co 0 0 N ... G) E E :::, U) .2' ... l'CI w .! ~ 0 a. ... 0 CJ ... Q) -~ er: ... l'CI ,, G) 0 '/ ) / :Y -.::t" I "' -CIJ CIJ .c: "' 801:'.:lSv ·~ L 'V'J/\ L 'di c'. 80 l 'di i; ':::>8 L '.:lS£ SO£ NS1'.'tJN, S£ '''' ''' ,, ,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,, ... ,,,..~ ,,,,,,,,, '''"'''"' ,,,,,,,-4 ,,,,,,,'f ''''''':1 ''''''''" ''''''''': ,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,i ''' ',,' '/ ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,1 ______ ...,_.,..,""1:,,,,,,,~ S 1'. ':)8 , tJN t, tJN L '80 L '801 £ .:lO L Lf,Jfd I '80 £ 'di 1'. '.:lS P (f:so z ·.:is s 1 '.::l.:ltJ 1: '80 £ ,-. S9 '80, 'V'JI\, 'NS l S £ 'tJN £ 3tJ L '00 £ '801 £ 0.:lO , .:lS l 'Lf>Ji\ L '00 P 'di L 80, ·so , 'di 1: 'c!O L 'c!S i, :)cltJ l ·c1s £ ·so , ·90 £ .,....,,..,~...-'''' '''' ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, ''''''''! ,,,,,,,1 '' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ,~,,,,, ,,,, ' ,,,, ' '' '' '\ ,,,,, ,,,,,,, 1-.,,,,,,· ,,,,,,. ,,,,,,· ,,,,,,, ''''''l -="'-''''''' ·~---"" ' ' ' ' '' ' . :-..,,,,,,. ,,,,,,, ' ,,,,,,, '''''''} ,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,, ' '''' ''· ,,,,,, ,,,,, ..... ',,,,,, ' .... ~~~~~~1 ',,,, ,,,, ' ,,,,~ ,,,, ,,,,,~ ,,,,,,, "''''' ,,,,,,- '''''' ,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,, I I I I I I I I I ' 00 C C N ... Q) E E ::s V, >. .:: ca w J!l ~ 0 C. ... 0 u ... Q) .2: c:: ... ca ,:, Q) u ' '' ·''\ I ,,,,,, ,,,,,, ' ' " " ' ' \ ''''"") I \ ,,,,,, S G 'NS Z: 'cJN £ ,,,,,,, ,,,,,, .. I I ;:-:JS i 'S S ,,,,,i J .._,,,,,. jJ 'cJ~(JB , ':JS , ''''''I , , , , , 'I -= " " ' ' ' ' J8 , '801 £ ,,,,,, '00 , 'VII/\ l ':JS £ ,,,,,,~ ,,,,,, ,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,_. '''''"' di £ :IS t, :,.,,,,,~ ,,,,, ' ,,,,~ I :IS l '80 Z: ' ' ' ' co ·sa v ·s c: '::>:J<:J z: '' ''' 0 0 ,,,,,, .. N soi ,,,,,,I ... Cl) ·s £ 'NS Z: ':IO i ,,,,,, E ,,,,,, ,,,,, E ,,,,, :::, cJN £ ·s 17 '''''"' en ,,,,,, >, ,,,,,,. ;:: :::i , ·s i ,,,,,,~ co ,,,,,,, w :IS , '801 £ ''''''l Cl) ,,,,,, -,,,,,,, co 80 C: :IS t, ... :,.,,,,..,,,-..: I 0 ' \fl:J , 'VII /\ , d I C: ,,,,,,,, Q. ' ,,,,,,· ... ' ''' ,, '· 0 80 2: di l ,,,,,,, I (.) ':JS £ 'J ' ,,,,,,, ... '' ''' '' '\ Cl) ,,,,,,,, -~ I() ,,,,,,,, 0::: I :1s , ·so s ·90 z: ,,,,,,,,, ... ''''''''" co en ,,,,,,,, 't:J -''''''''\ Cl) C1) J:Jl:J l 'S £ ,,,,,,,, (.) C1) '80 I 'J8 I ,,,,,,,, .c: ,,,,,,,,, en // '\ ,,,,,,,,,, (( '" ,,,,,,,,,. ¢=Jz ss ',,,,,,,,, \ .. ''''''''') ~ . ",,,,,,,,, ' ,,,,,,,, --~ ,,,,,,,, I SI ,,,,,,,, ""' 'NS Z: 'cJN I 'vcJ i ' ~,,,,,,,: ~ ' ,,,,,,,. ~ ' ,,,,,,,, cJN 2: ,, ',,,,,,, :IS Z: '801 2: , .... ". ,,,,,,, j ''' '' '' ,, ' ... '~ '''"''''' I I I J u, -Cl) Cl) .c u, l,,,,,, ' ~'''''' ~'''''' t ,,,,,, '''''' ,,,,,,, ~,,,,,, ·''''-' \~~~~ '''' '''' ''''' . ,,,,,, ,,,,, ~~~~~, '''' ~~~~~~ I'''''' '''''' ~-...... ''''''' ' ·'''''''" ~"· .,,,,,,,,, '''''''''' ,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,' £JO r ·::1s v ·=1a ( 'di c ·sa ( V\IA ( '00 £ '::IS v ' ' ' ' '' '' ' '' '~ . .,.,. '""'' ,,,,,,,,,,,, G:' CIJ !s -"C ; ... -! :, $. E if -QI 2l II Cl ... ci c5 0 a, f- (') <5 a: a) Cl) ~ ::afo > LL g~ ~co ~ ... ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,~ \ \ ' -..;: Cl'.-0 u.. z Cl'. (') "' ~ Cl) D .Z "' -0 Cl) Cl) Cl) lL r--N "' - ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,, ·,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,~,,,,,,,, '\"''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' ~,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ~,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, •, ~ ,., .__.. t I t ,,... ,._."""--,, '\,."\.......::. zq ~-. .,,,,,,,,,,,,.....__ ~,,,,,,,,,,,,,,._,_ ---~~~,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,. ---· .. ,,<,,~,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,· ~,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,. (,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, . . ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,. ~,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,. 1,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, . . .;......:.. ' .. , '-~' ::,.,, '>' ''' ''' ''' )-__...._''' ''' ''' I ~-. ,· . r - • 00 0 0 N ... Q) E E ~ U) >, i: Ill w .e ~ 0 e- 0 0 ... Q) -~ a::: ... ttl "C a, 0 0 CD Q. Ill ., :::0 <' CD ., 0 0 ., "C 0 iil -CD m Ill ., '< en C 3 3 CD ., N c:, 0 ex, .. ,,,,,,,,r, /////////\ ,///////// ///////,'/ ,'//,'//////. //////////, .1////////// ///////////\ 1////////// ,,/////////) r/////////// ,'/////////// //////////// /////////// /////////// . ., / / / / / / / / / /' /////////// 1////////1 ////////// /,//////// ///////// /////////. 1//////// "///////, ///////\ 1////// /////// /////// //////// '/////// {///////, 1////////\ ////////,/ , / / /// / / "\ '//////// /////////,t ,/////////,\ ////////// //////////• ,'/////////. //////////\' /////,'//// /////,'//// "////////// ,,/,'////////, "/////////// //////////// /////////// //////////// '"/////////// /////////// /////////// /////////// //////////// //////////// /////////// ///////////<. /////////// /,////////// ////////// . ////////// 1///////// '///////// ,'///////// ////////// //////////. .'/"/,//("'////,I //////////, //////////~ ////////// ////////// z n ////// /////// /////// 1 C, 3 IP, 2 OG, 3 FD, 2 TB (volunteer) 2 C. 1 OG, 4 FD 3 TOG, 1 SF 1 FD. 2 0G ,.,.,.,.,.,1/~r-~~t~(~O~""'"il----------,.,./,.,.,.~ ,. ~ I ~//////~ '///// / ,-'///// / .r,1///// I'. / / / •' / / /'lJai '(_////// ///,///// ///// /////~/ //,I// /., ///// f /,1// // /,I/// / 5 SF 2 NR, 1 DF, 4S 1 NR, 4 SF. 2 SN, 4 S, 1 BC 2 DS, 2 OG, 1 RFC 2 DS, 5 SF, 1 IP, 2 OG, 1 RE f. ~ ~ ~ ~; ~., ,I ~J I ;~~;~,. ~-~-~-~~-~-------"//////// (///////~ ,'//////_r / //// ,¥/ ///// ///// ///// ///// ////// ////// ////// /////// ./////// /////// ' "/////// /////// /////// (/////,// "//////// 3 OG. 2 IP, 1 DF, 1 SF, 3 FD, 2 RE 1-BC.2S, 3 ~ 3 SF, 1 RE .J,. -· 'l 2 SN. 3 SF, 3 S, 1 DS, 2 RFC en ::::r (D (D -m I .,Ir,, n CD Q. II) "'I ::a <" CD "'I n 0 "'I "C 0 ~ S- m II) "'I '< en C: 3 3 CD "'I N C) C) 00 '/,////////. '///////,/// '/////////, ////////,1/J ,////////// '///////,// ////,////,/,/" /////////// I ,' ,' / / / / / / / /• '////////// //,//,'/////,'\ ///,'/////// /////////// //,!//////// '///////,','// /,!/////////,. //////////// /////////// /////////// /////////// /////////// /////////// /////////// 1////////// , ,I ,I ,I / / ,I / / / /' //////,1//,I/ ,'/////,1//,1/. //////,1///J 1///////// ,,1//////I/ //,1////// '//////// '////////, '//////// ,1///////1 ,//////// //////// //////// I ,I / / / / / / ,, , /,,,.,,/.,,,I ,,1,1///// 1/////// /////,1/,I I'/////'// 1,1//////' 1/,1///// ,,1/////1 '////// I////// ,1///,1// ,I/////// 1///////" /////,1// 1////// ////,1// //,I//// 1////// /////// 1////// /////// ////// ,'////// 1/////, I'///~/ l/.'//1 //./// ///// I//// f I I//'' I/// ,1/ ,I / I/, /! ,I // : ,, / /// // / / / /// // // // / ,, // // // \~ / / / ,,,.,,,..,., J "//////1 /////// //II/// 1////// //////// //////// ////I/// / / ,I / / / / ,,J.,..,,i.J I////// ,I/ /////// ////// / ////// / 3 SF, 1 RA, 2 IP, 1 OG, 3 OS 1 IP, 2 OG, 1 VM, 1 RA 3 TOG, 2 OG, 1 S \'////// / ,/////// ////////'&""4~~,.i.i------- //////// ////////t/~ •,1 ///////YA'".~ ~ ///////, ,'///// ////// //,','/// 3 NR 1 C,2SN,3S, 1 NR 5 OG 1 C, 1 S J / / / / / / ),IAX:J ////// /,'/// ///// / ~7 \~.,,t,'11ii'.,,ij,1,'-1l .. 1----- 1 OG, 2 NR __.. I I ~ t.r') ~ -c.n I --)) __.. -.:t" ~ __., -....J I.() --CX) \ I _._l,. ~ r·, ·--7 ,...._1 ( I '_J _, z n en ::r (D (D -m I N LJ z .------. -I ;;------- C"') I w -;;-::.c:====::::l n: --u. M Cl) :;,: ... > 0:: ~z u.: ~ DdW ~ocr -~..,. §~g- MN N ..-- ..-- _ [L- u 0 dU.: 0 CJ) f-" "'z w ll'.-CJ) D:'. z.,-M (0 (.9 c5 CJJ O ro " ... ~ :g M Cl 0 M n: ':o 0 LL ai er MN /////// I/// / /I///.'/////// 9' //I / ///////////////////// ////////////////////// I I Y/l//////////////1////// ///r/////////////////// //I ~////////////////// /// '-.////////////////// I I/ ~ ... ,. ~ / .tl / / / / / / J /// ////// /// ////// /// /////// /// ///////J // ///////J // !//////// // ~/////// 111 f 1111111 // /////// //. /////// // //////// // //////// I '11,.//,'// !//,'///// //////// ////////. //,'/////, ,,/////////1 i ///////// ////,'////. /////////1 ///////// ////////.// co C C N ... Cl) E E ::, ti) >, ;: m w Cl) -m ... 0 e- 0 (.) ... Cl) -~ ~ ... m "C Cl) (.) ,,, ,,, ''' ,,, ''' ,,, T"" ,,, ,,, ,,, z ,,,,, -t'''''>: ~ ,,,,, ci> ,,,,, ~ y;>· U) \~ I \~ 0G TOG TOG BC TOG 0G RE RE C NR s NR s BC s NR RE RE s SN s SN s C s I J / -- CC) 0 0 N ... Q) E E ::I rn >, .::: n, w $ ~ 0 Cl. ... 0 c., ... Q) .~ 0::: ... n, 'C Q) c., t:SUAKU AL,KU:,~ KUL,t\. .::>t"ILLV\l ) ' ;/ OF I' SF VM 0G RE SF, RE RE, SF C \ TOG TOG. TOG TOG S, RE s BC co NR C) NR, S C) s N ... NR. BC Q) s E SN • E I SN :I S,S,S tn RA >, I 't: SF RI N RFC w I SF, 0G Q) ... z DS RI ... -BC 0 Cl) SF a. Cl) 1 OG,OG I ... .c: 0 en DS --)) (.) SF ... DS OG Q) ~ .i? SF ' 0G 0::: C ... IP I CIJ "O 0G Q) IP (.) SF IP ;:,-, -111 . I VM SF • 0G 0G ¢:Jz M I z .. Q) Q) .c en I I • ' \ BC OG, SF / DS, SF RE, RE SF, BC 0G SF. IP IP OG,SF IP C,SF,SF VM,OG SF 0G DF OG, TOG TOG RE OG,RE RA,S S, RE BC, S NR NR, S NR BC, S SN s SN BC RFC S RFC SFOG cnOG IV''"' "',"':I. ..--SF C OG, SF DS DS 0G SF OS, OG SF C, DS OG IP SF IP IP \ I • SO cl::) \I Ocl \108 ) A\/MllldS KlOcl S -~ CIO 0 0 N ... CII E E :::I UJ >, ;: ra w J!l E 0 C. ... 0 () ... CII -~ 0::: ... ra "'C CII () Sheet N -4 - 88~ 8(/)8 ~(/) 0 D N 22 2 BC, 2 SN, 5 OG, 6 S, 1 DF, 3 SF, 3 DS. 1 VM 3 NR 3 TOG ___.,.- -5 OG, 3 DS, 2 S, 6 SF, 2 RFC, 3 IP, 1 DF,1 BC 1 C, 3 RA, 9 S, 9 OG, 1 RFC, 3 DS, 7 SF, 1 DF, 2 IP, 3 TOG, 2 C, 3 NR, 2 SN. 1 BC ;--;-///;/////////////////////////////,,.f.L//77'//// ///,Y/L \fa \':J \be \~ / \\ \Q ~ ~ 1 #y \'c~ ~ :\ ~ Cedar River Corporate Early Summer 2008 . . APPENDIX 2: 0ET AILFD PLANT QUANTITIES TABLES 8 Monitoring Sheet Plant Trees A/nus rubra Prunus virginiana Pseudotsuga menziesii Rhamnus purshiana Shrubs Acer circinatum Berberis aquifolium Oemferio cerasiformis Ribes sanguineum Rosa nutkana Sambucus racemosa Spiraea doug/assii Symphoricarpos a/bus Rubus parviflorus Groundcovers Berberis nervosa Gaultheria shallon 8/echnum spicant Polystichum munitum Totals Red alder bitter cherry Douglas fir cascara vine maple tall Oregon grape Indian plum Cedar River Corporate Park Buffer Enhancement Renton, Washington June 26, 2008 5-1 5-2 5-3 5-4 Symbol Quantity Quantity Quantity Quantity RA 2 1 BC 8 1 5 2 DF 1 2 3 C 2 3 1 1 VM 1 3 3 4 TOG 2 4 6 6 IP 2 8 6 10 red-flowering currant RFC 2 4 3 6 Nootka rose NR 3 6 6 9 red elderberry RE 2 6 4 1 Douglas spirea DS 6 5 6 8 snowberry SN 2 2 8 4 Thimbleberry TB 0 short Oregon grape OG 13 16 16 30 salal s 7 19 31 17 Deer fern FD western sword fern SF 9 19 19 25 59 99 116 127 5-5 S-6 Quantity Quantity TOTAL 2 1 6 3 4 23 1 3 10 2 1 10 2 2 15 8 5 31 6 7 39 3 6 24 10 6 40 5 18 8 9 42 6 4 26 2 2 10 9 94 24 19 117 11 11 21 9 102 106 103 610 Monitoring Sheet E -1 E-2 E-3 Plant Symbol Quantity Quantity Quantity TOTAL Trees A/nus rubra Red alder RA 2 2 Prunus virginiana bitter cherry BC 2 4 6 Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas fir DF 2 2 4 Rhamnus purshiana cascara C 3 2 3 8 Shrubs Acer circinatum vine maple VM 1 1 1 3 Berberis aquifolium tall Oregon grape TOG 6 3 5 14 Oemleria cerasiformis Indian plum IP 6 3 6 15 Ribes sanguineum red-flowering currant RFC 3 2 5 Rosa nutkana Nootka rose NR 6 6 9 21 Sambucus racemoso red elderberry RE 4 7 11 Spiraea douglassii Douglas spirea DS 5 3 5 13 Symphoricarpos a/bus snowberry SN 4 2 4 10 Rubus parviflorus Thimbleberry TB 2 2 Groundcovers Berberis nervosa short Oregon grape OG 12 11 21 44 Gaultheria shal/on salal s 15 5 6 26 8/echnum spicant Deer fern FD 13 13 Polystichum munitum western sword fern SF 20 3 11 34 Totals 104 41 86 231 Monitoring Sheet N-1 N-2 N-3 N-4 Plant Symbol Quantity Quantity Quantity Quantity TOTAL Trees A/nus rubra Red alder RA 1 1 3 5 Prunus virginiana bitter cherry BC 2 3 5 4 14 Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas fir DF 1 1 3 5 Rhamnus purshiana cascara C 2 2 3 3 10 Shrubs Acer circinatum vine maple VM 2 1 1 4 Berberis aquifolium tall Oregon grape TOG 3 4 2 6 15 Oemleria cerasiformis Indian plum IP 4 6 5 15 Ribes sanguineum red-flowering currant RFC 1 2 3 6 Rosa nutkana Nootka rose NR 3 3 3 6 15 Sambucus racemosa red elderberry RE 4 4 5 13 Spiraea douglassii Douglas spirea DS 3 4 9 16 Symphoricarpos a/bus snowberry SN 2 2 2 4 10 Rubus parviflorus Thimbleberry TB Groundcovers Berberis nervosa short Oregon grape OG 2 10 14 19 45 Blechnum spicant Deer fern FD Gaultheria shallon salal s 7 8 7 17 39 Polystichum munitum western sword fern SF 11 14 16 41 Totals 25 59 70 99 253 GRAND TOTALS: Plant Symbol 51 -56 El-E3 Nl-N4 Grand TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL Total . . Trees A/nus rubra Red alder RA 6 2 5 13 Prunus virginiana bitter cherry BC 23 6 14 43 Pseudatsuga menziesii Douglas fir OF 10 4 5 19 Rhamnus purshiana cascara C 10 8 10 28 Shrubs Acer circinatum vine maple VM 15 3 4 22 Berberis aquifolium tall Oregon grape TOG 31 14 15 60 Oemleria cerasiformis Indian plum IP 39 15 15 69 Ribes sanguineum red-flowering currant RFC 24 5 6 35 Rosa nutkana Nootka rose NR 40 21 15 76 Sambucus racemosa red elderberry RE 18 11 13 42 Spiraea douglassii Douglas spirea OS 42 13 16 71 Symphoricarpos a/bus snowberry SN 26 10 10 46 Rubus parviflorus Thimbleberry TB 2 2 4 Groundcovers Berberis nervosa short Oregon grape OG 94 44 45 183 Gaultheria shallon salal s 117 26 39 182 8/echnum spicant Deer fern FD 11 13 24 Polystichum munitum western sword fern SF 102 34 41 177 Totals 610 231 253 1094 APPENDIX 3: J\;\ONITORJNG PHOTOG!tAPHS jU\11::. 26, 2008 9 NOTE: Monitoring Photographs are Indexed to the features Identified here. ~-' / Raingardens ~ . . / ... -000'~.::Ta,=:·,tr,1~, (~ ... (; "("-, : -~ • ·, : ,.r.. .. ' ._· -~ ,-: :.; , ' J IJ ' ... , .. . . • . . . ·· ·· r -· 1.:--· u --tT · ---·· r, ·-- lJ /l I .. -., ~ . ' l r ·.~ .. n\ r'l .,-. L '[ -I I' ·. i J I ,n- -, : _r_-·•.~ . I : . IJ . --• -1 C IO'CI __ ' I ·-I , I..,. C ~o' II ... a. I (l) ,. IC ' ,, , I I ~ I,,. . I 3" "'• ' I ~''O.D i, -. I I , ~. ,a,,. c=-~~ :3: 1 ,1/) i° I -_Q :1 al 1/~1 " 18 I"-") -, 1 ·· \iii,<_ EB V .J ... l.L"'.:_-i~J l ,·, • 1,\ /·~--l _J I~, I ·, ' / ' I·< EA I •(cJ)/ \ (''. -· r i 1· 1 . i' 1 , · , ·, -· , • :f·.. . ; '·· J. L/ ·.. = c:::__ ) \: ./. ', .~= .-CC.. './ .. -J . I I . , ' 1ti;) , ,' .. ~ "' ··gJ . . j: .·· ~-r=1~=t"~·r~,,r,~r·~. SA SB SC SD SE SF SG S ~' ' ,_;_j [~: -......... -. Index Sheet for Monitoring Photographs mmm11=" ~~-i:iuiu:n CEDAR RIVER CORPORATE PARK Photo 1: 5-A Looking west Photo 2: 5-A Looking east Photo 3: 5-B Looking east Photo 4: 5-C Looking east • Photo 5: SD looking east. Photo 6: SE looking east. . . ~-~- Photo 7: SF looking east. • • Photo 8: SX looking west Photo 9: SX looking north Photo 10: EA looking north Photo 11: EB looking north .. • • Photo 12 : Between detention pond and bioswale looking north Photo 13: Between detention pond and bioswale looking east .. . • Photo 14: South end of raing arden looking west Photo 15: Between ra ingardens, looking north ·.A>-''il:iP..t.,..; ,:,: ¥: Photo 16: Between raingardens, looking west CIT"'-::>F RENTON Department of Community and Economic Development Denis Law, ivlayor Alex Pietsch, Administrator May 6, 2008 Charlie Foushee Tarragon Development 1000 2"d Ave Ste #3200 Seattle, WA 98104 Subject: I'' Quarter Wetland Maintenance and Monitoring Report Cedar River Corporate Park City of Renton File LUA06-172 Dear Mr. Fraser: This letter is to inform you that I received the 1" quarter maintenance and monitoring report for the Cedar River Corporate Park project on May 2, 2008. There is insufficient information to determine that the project is meeting performance standards. Clarification of several points of this report is needed. Specifically, the issues are as follows: • The report should note the goals and objectives of the approved mitigation plan. • The report should specifically address how the project is achieving or not achieving each of the goals and objectives of the mitigation plan • The report should document in writing the milestones, successes, problems, and contingency actions of the compensation project. • The report should clearly state that the project 1s meeting each of the goals and objectives to be considered in compliance. Two copies of a revised first quarterly monitoring report are due to the City by May 16, 2008 clearly stating that the project is meeting performance standards. If you have any questions feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7219. Sincerely, Rocale Timmons Planning Division cc: City of Renton File No. LUA06-162 Celeste Botha -------] 0_5_5_S_o-ut_h_C_ir-ad_)_' W-ay--R-e,-Jto-,-,,-\\-,a-sh_i_ngt-01-1 -9-80_5_7 _______ ~ @ This paper cor1ta1ns 50',:, recycled material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CGRVE 0 Delineation 0 R.econnalssance evaluatio[lJlil 0 Permlt aesi.stanoe and agency coordination e Profe8Sional report pr~tion 0 Impact analysis and eequencing April 29, 2008 Rocale Timmons City of Renton Development Services 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 WETLAND PERMnTING SERVICES Phon~ (Zo6) ,,,,,..,,.,,5 F.x, (""') 9'-ffl9 Cell:(Zo6)~3 wps@isp.oorn RE: Cedar River Corporate Park project (LUA 06-172) Mitigation planning and moni.mring e linear projects (roads. pc,wer and rs lines) a Environmental cmnplbnce during OO[lJlilb'uction 0 Peer revi.ew and permit conditioning 0 Wetland i.nvent:Driea: 0 M/l' RECEi'vElJ Buffer restoration and enhancement as-builts and Spring monitoring report Dear Rocale: 1 completed my as-built inspection/Year One Spring monitoring of the buffer restoration and enhancement installation for the Cedar River Corporate Park project (LUA 06-172) on April 17, 2008. Results of the inspection are attached as an overview map, detail sheets, and a summary table. Photographs were submitted with the original inspection report. You will note that there are some deficiencies between the specified quantities and quantities actually located. In addition, some attrition has occurred since installation was completed. The landscapers have been notified and replacement will occur as soon as possible. Once the replacements are in place, the detail sheets will be modified accordingly. These revised detail sheets will be submitted to the city if requested. Thank you for the opportunity to provide you with this information. Please do not hesitate to call with questions or concerns. Sincerely, '·, Celeste Botha CC: Charlie Foushee, Tarragon LLC 2o25 South Nonnan St.Feet Seattle, Waffl~n 4)8,Y-4 Plant Trees A/nus rubra 1. Red alder Prunus virginiano bitter cherry Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas fir Shrubs Acer circinatum vine maple Berberis aquifollum tall Oregon grape Berberis nervosa short Oregon grape Goultheria shallon salal Oemleria cerasiformis 2-Indian plum Rhamnus purshiana cascara Ribes sanguineum red-flowering currant Rosa nutkana Nootka rose Sambucus racemosa red elderberry Spiraea douglassii Douglas spirea Symphoricarpos albus snowberry Groundcovers Polystichum munitum western sword fern Totals Cedar River Corporate Park Buffer Enhancement As-Built/Year One Spring Monitoring Summary Table Renton, Washington April 17, 2008 Symbol Quantity Quantity Quantity located Specified Located (Dead) RA 15 12 BC 41 36 DF 20 19 2 VM 23 23 TOG 68 66 1 OG 273 272 2 5 227 196 16 IP 68 71 C 23 21 RFC 45 44 3 NR 68 60 RE 68 1 DS 68 60 SN 45 46 SF 204 195 1256 1122 24 1. Three red alder misidentified with Indian plum (will correct at nelCt monitoring event) 2. Three Indian plum misidentified with red alder (will correct at nei.:t monitoring event) Quantity located Replace % (Alive) Survivorship 12 80.00% 36 5 87.80% 17 1 85.00% 23 0 100.00% 65 2 95.59% 270 1 98.90% 180 31 79.30% 71 104.41% 21 2 91.30% 41 1 91.11% 60 8 88.24% 1 67 1.47% 60 8 88.24% 46 -1 102.22% 195 9 95.59% 1098 134 87.42% \ NOTE: PLANTS LOCATED ON DETAIL SHEETS S -1 THROUGH S -6, AND E -1 THROUGH E • 3 ARE PLANTED WITHIN THE ENHANCEMENT AREA LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE INDICATED PARKING STALL. PLANTS LOCATED ON SHEETS N -1 THROUGH N -4 ARE LOCATED IN THE APPROXIMATE ORDER SHOWN. ~-e(tr)_c;::rl :,.:J.~;::r;_:·:2(r:.~:::p;;(Jf!j._:;;:c ~-r-+Q;f?-P· sheet N. 1 . Sheet N -2 Sheet N -3 yl,,Shttf,...N. :4 ,-. .rl .1,,_:_~~, L~l \ -r , I -, _____ J I I ir~~~=J . ' };;:> !"i . Sheet E-3 :~1 Sh~E-2 (} ' .s:; 'C!:, Shel'E:-1 ,:•, ·'1 ' 1 Sheet S · 1 , Sheet S • 2 Sheet S-r 3 Sheet S -4 . S~eet S -5 '... Sh.eet ~ 6 --. -. . -' ""'""' ,·,,'-.,. . -~~ -· D.h ~,;;at.',,l.:,·~_·?,,;~'·!f..;.;,clff{if?; .·t:J.J o::;:..;,.,~_,•::v·._.;,:_-qc C:f·J() 0 ··-....:J~·-kj-; Co.(~f';, i I '*J"··--- WETUII> IUFFlll PlAlfT 5CIEDUU --l"!':. -·-- : . :1~~;-,i,;-:?;~L'i Overview As-Built and Monitoring Map mmm11:=-~=-· CEDAR RIVER CORPORATE PARK z a) Q) .s:::. U) ,,, ''' ,,, ,,, ,,, ,,, ,,, ,,,,, "''''" t,...,,,,, ''''" y~=-· I OG TOG TOG BC TOG OG s NR NR s C NR s BC s NR s SN S (DEAD) SN C s ,~ I • j ---- ::I m I ~ .s ~ 0 a. .. 0 0 .. G) > ii: .. ('IS "C G) 0 BOARD ACROSS ROCK J -, OF \ SF I' VM OG SF SF C \ OG,S TOG, TOG TOG s s BC s NR NR,S s NRBC .... ·-:::J m s I SN SN • II) <( S,S,S Cl) .... I C RFC (DEAD) f! 0 SF C. ... I RFC 0 SF,OG OS BC 0 • SF • ... Cl) > ·-OG,OG 0::: l OS --... ~ 111 l SF "C DS,OG Cl) 0 SF OG C • I IP I OG IP • SF IP I IP N ___ ,, ~ z I ; SF ::J~ --111 Q) ; ' SF OG • Q) 0G .c: en ¢=Jz I r I i~ BC ' i OG,SF I ~ ,~r~"-,...,., OS, SF • 0G SF, BC 0G SF, IP O'> IP • ...- OG,SF IP C, SF VM, 0G SF I OG,SF ~~,TOG OG, TOG l) ,..,__.,.,, 'i."-,,~ TOG(DEAD) \ == • 0G :::, RA,S ~ s ~ BC, S NR . Q) .... NR, S \ cu NR ... 0 BC,S a. S, SN ... s SN 0 BC 0 ... Q) RFC, S .2!: RFC 0::: O)SF,OG ... ..-SF 0G cu "C Q) C 0 OG,SF OS • IT.',' ""l11....l OS m 0G I ("') I SF, OS SF I C z 0G -• ... ,~ IP Cl) •1.,,.,,_,1 , SF I Cl) • .c: IP IP en ¢:=Jz "' • -~~-----A 't>'Mllld S >1:)0}:I SSO}J::J'ef ml\lOS ------' - @ 8 ~ @ en ell ell en () () ~ 0 ~ _g 20 21 _/ 22 LJ SheetN-4 3 BC, 2 SN, 8 OG, 7 S, 1 DF, 6 SF, 3 DS, 1 VM ,.__,..,,-20 OG, 3 DS, 2 S, 6 SF, 2 RFC, 3 IP 1 C, 3 RA, 7 S, 11 0G (1 DEAD), 2 RFC, 3 DS, 8 SF, 3 DF (2 UNHEALTHY), 3 IP (1 DEAD), 3 TOG, 2 S, 3 NR, 2 SN, 1 BC ,1 ~ Cedar River Corporate As-Built \'<> ,~ \he ,~ ,~ ,I' / \1 / ~-;..-· ''/ -:,,.,,:;- ·_,,,-·/ ,.,,.,,..,.,. ,..,_,,.. _.....-:,/ ..... -::>;.,-- / 0 CD Q. QI .., :::0 :c:· CD .., 0 0 .., "C 0 iil S" ~ I OJ C: ~ I I I I I ' j =1 ,. Ii • ' : 35 ' i ' 3 0G, 2 RFC, 2 SF, 1 OS 2 OS, 1 SF, JOG i 2 BC, 2 IP, 3 SF, : 400 1 ~1 BC,2DS 3 S (1 DEAD) zc> en ::::T (1) (1) -en .!i.. I l 0 CD C. Ill -, ;;o ~- -, 0 0 -, "l:J 0 iii s- ~ I OJ C: -· ;::;: I I I I I I I I I .,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,~w4~-"'"l'i-------.,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,, ~'''''''' ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,~ ....... ,,,,,,, ,,,,,, ,,,,,, ,,,,,, ,,,,,,' ,,,,,,, ,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, ·,' ''''' ' ,,,,,,,' '''''''' ' ''''' '' -.;:r<. -~-- I 1 BC, 3 S (1 DE'AD) 4 s, 1 00 3 00, 1 RA, 2 DS, 2RFC 1 DS, 3 SF, 2 IP, 400 1 IP, 1 VM, 200 3 SF, 1 NR, 1 00 ''''' ''' ':t---ir.,i.!i-.,4.1-------,,,,,,, ,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,' ,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,, .,,,,,,,, ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' .'V""'l''i: ' ,,,,,,,, 2 NR, 1 VM, 1 SN, 15 5 S ( 1 DE'AD) 1 C, 1 RFC,4 S (2 DE'AD) ,,,,,,, ,,,,,,, ,,,,,,, .,,,,,,, ----~:~~~~5 ~~32s~· ~ ... '' \)I. ' ' ' \,,ll!'li~-"*"------,, ~.,, 'II ,,,,,,, ,,,,,,, ,,,,,,, '''''''" ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, 1 RA, 1 SF, 1 IP, 300 3 IP, 2 00, 1 SF ., ''' ''' '~~~,Jelt~-------'' '''''' ,,,,,, 3 SF, 1 VM, 1 IP, 200 t'' ''' '' t;..ib:,'~ ,,,,,, ~~~-#-------''' ,, ' .~ ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' II-<'.,""',<: "'''''''' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ,...it"""'""". t ,,,,,' '"'' "' ~~~~~ F~~~~, ~ 3TOO 3 NR, 3 S, 1 DF en :::r (1) (1) -en I N \ I I II 0 CD Q. Ill ""I ::0 <' CD ""I 0 0 ""I 'tJ 0 iil -CD t I m C: -· ;:::;: I I I I I I I I ' .,, ' ' t''''' (~i~i ,; '''''' ''''''" ·''''''' ''''''' f'''' '''' ''''' ''''' ''''''' ·''''''' '''''' !'''''' ''''' '''''' ,,,,,, ''''''' l ''''''' ''''''' ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, _,,,,,,,, " ' ' ' ' ' ' ' .... """''-- J 2 SN, 5 S 1 DF, 2 RFC, 2 OG, 2 S (1 DEAD) 1 DS, 3SF, 3 OG, 2SN,1DF 3 SF, 3 IP, 2 OG ""'~"''""· -----· I 3 SF, 1 VM, 3 OG, 1 TOG 1 OG, 1 C, 2 TOG "' ''''' i,' ''''' ., ''''' ' ,,,,,,,,~,i!iii~ .. ....,------- :,' ''''' '''''''' ~.:,.,.,.,f '''''''' ''''''' ,,,,,,, ''''''' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' -..: '''''''' ,,,,,,,, '''''''' ., ''' '''' ,,,,,,,, t''''''' ,,._ '" ' ''''''' ,,::: ,,,,,,, '"' ''''''' ,,._ ,,,,,,,, "'-'· ,,,,,,,, ,-,-" ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ~ -" ,,'-., .,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,, ,,,,,,, ''''''' ''''''' ''''''' '''''' ,,,,,,, ,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, ~,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, '''''''' ''''''' '''''' '''''' .,,,,,, '''''' 2NR,1DS 1 BC, 2 SN, 3 S f 1 BC, SS 30G,2RFC, 1 DS, 1 SF 4 OG, 1 IP, 3 SF, 1 SN 2 BC, 3 SF, 1 VM, 31P,40G , 3 TOG, 3 OG, 3 SF I I 3 NR, 1 BC, 1 SN, 4 S (2 DEAD) 1SN,6S,1VM "' ::r CD CD -"' r I l I I j 0 C'D Q. II> .., ;::o <" C'D .., 0 0 -a 0 iii it ~ I m C: ~ ' I I I I I I I I I \''''''' ,,,,,,, •'''''" "''''' -'''''' ,,,,,, t'''''" ,,,,, ,,,, n ~~~~ : ,,,, ~ ,,,,, ,,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,' ,,,,,, ,,,,,, ·,'' ''' ' ,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, ''''"''' ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,, '"'''' ,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,' .,,,,,,, \ .,,,,,,, '''''''"'~:...::-'''''' ,,,,,,, ·'''''' .,,,,,, .,,,,,,-...: ,,,,,,, ,,,,, ,,,,, ,,,, ,,,, 1 SN, 6 S, 1 VM, 3 OG, 2 DS, 3 SF, 2RFC, 20G 4 SF, 1 DF, 2 IP, 1 SN, 20G 1 IP, 4 OG, 1 VM 2SF ' 1 OF, 3 TOG, 3 0G I 3 ~ 4 S (2 DEAD) I l2 SN, 1 VM, 1 OG, 6 S (2 DEAD) 3 OG, 2 RFC 3 SF, 2 DS I 4SF,21P,30G l I 1 IP, 2 SF, 1 C 300 ' '''''"' ' ' ' ' ' ' I 1 OF, 3 TOG, '''''' I 200 t ,,,,,,, ,,,,,,, 11 ~;~~~~~;r~~-~~!~1~~~~1·D~r-·2-s ,,,,,,,, I• '''''''' 1.,l,4S,1NR,2SN '''''''' ,,,,,,,, I ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, ~,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,, 1''''''''' ..,,,,,,,, ._,,,,,,, "''''''' """"''''''' ,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,, ,' ''' '' ''' ,, ',, '''' . . . . 3S,60G, 2RFC en ::T CD CD -en L __ (") Cl) C. s:u. -, ;;o <" Cl) -, (") 0 -, "C 0 iil co ~ I m C: -· ;:;: I I I I I I I t I I """*' "'I -----• 2TOG, 2 SF, 2NR 1 RA,1 ~2SN 7 S (1 DE'AD) 1 '1 BC, 1 OG, JS, 1 RFC 40G,3DS,1SF 1C,3SF, 1 IP, 200 2 IP, 1 VM, 1 RA, 4 SF, 200 200,JTOO, 1SF,1S,1C 1 RE,4 S, 3 ~ 4 SF, 3 IP, 3 OG JSF, 1 VM, 500, 3 TOG, 1 IP R, /2NR,2SN,4S (.JJ ~ Cl) Cl) -(.JJ I u, -~I ,,,--. . , • C:::::,.. -~ --d-.,,,,,,, ,~,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ~~ '~' ( (, ( ( ,,--~ .,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, .,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, .,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,~ .,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,. ·'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''') .,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, .,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,~ ·'''''''''''''''''''''''''''~'>>•···· .,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.).-' ~,,,,,,,,,,,,,,~ z q --....., '' ''' ''''' ~. ··~ 4 SF, 4 OG, 1 VM 1 DS, 3 IP, 1 DF, 4SF,40G 1 RA, 2 RFC, 2 OG, 1 DS en ::::r (D (D -en I a, I I I I I I I n CD C. I» ., ::0 ::r CD ., n 0 -a 0 iiJ it ~ m C: -· ;:. .. ,,,,,,,\ '/////// ,//////// '//////// ,,,,,,//////. ,1///////// .. ,1////////// '////////// '////////// ,,///////// ;//,'//////// ,/////////// '//////,'//// ,,///////// '//////////. ,,,.,,,,,,,,,////" '///////.,// ,.,,,.,.,,,.,//1 ;///////// ;/.,////// ,.,.,,,.,.,.,.,,, ,.,.,.,.,,,.,,,,, ,.,.,.,,,,,.,,,,,. ,1///////, 1//////t ,.,.,,,.,,,., ,.,.,,,.,,,., ,I////// ,.,.,,,,,,,.,, f/////// ;///////, ,,,.,.,.,,,,,., ... '//////// 1////////, '//,'///// /////////\ ;////////~ 1///////// ,, ., ////////• ,1///.,////,. ,1///;'/////\ I,'//////// 1///////// 1////////// ;/////.,////, l//////.,///1 1//////////., ,,,,,,,,,.,,,.,.,.,,,,,A ~/////////// )/,'///////// /////////// ,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,,,,,v /////////// 1/////////// 1/////////.,/ ,,,,,.,.,////// l//////////4 1////////// 1////////// //////.,/// ,1///////// ,,.,.,/////// r///////// ;///////// ,,.,.,,,,,,,,,,.,,, ,1/////////. ,,,.,,,.,.,.,.,,,,,, 1/////////; ;/////////1 .!///////// ////////// 1 C, 3 IP, 20G 1 SF ' 2 C, 20G, 1 SF 3TOG, 1 SF 40G ' 5 SF, 2 NR, 1 OF 4S ' 1 NR,4 SF, 2 SN, 4S, 1 BC 1 DS, 2 OG, 2 RFC (1 DEAD) 2 DS, 5 SF, 1 IP 20G ' 3 0G, 2 IP, 1 OF, 3SF 1 SF, 1 VM, I 3 TOG, 2 S •b:------1 : 1 BC,3S,35 : 3SF 11===._;1. i ! 2 SN, 3 SF, 2S, 1 DS 2 RFC (1 DlcAD) ' 0 CD Cl. II) ., ;:u <" CD ., 0 0 -a 0 iiJ ;- ~ I m C: -· ;:::; ;,.,.,.,.,.,.,. ,'/. ,,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,. ,,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,,,., 1/////////1 /,'//////,',' I///////// ,,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,. I/,'//////// I / / / / / / ,' / / /• ,,.,.,.,.,.,,,.,.,.,. ,,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.\ //,'//////// I////////// ,'///,'/,'///,' 1//////////1 ////,'//////,. 1//,///,'////,' ,,.,.,.,.,.,..,,.,.,. //,'//,'///,// ,,.,..,,.,.,.,.,.,.,. ,,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,. I///////,/// I////////// ////////,'// '////////// ///////,'//". /////////,'/ 1/////////y ////////,'/ ////////// ,,,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,. I//////// ,,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,., I//////// ,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,., ,'/////// //////// I/////// ////////, , ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. "'I ,,.,.,.,.,.,.,. I/////// ,,.,.,..,,.,.,. //////// ,,.,.,.,.,.,.,.. /,'////,'," ,,.,.,.,.,.,.1 ,,.,.,.,.,.,. ;////// /,"///// //////// 1///////' ;/////// ,,.,.,.,.,.,. 1////// ,,.,.,.,.,.,. 1////// ,,.,.,.,.,.., /////// 1////// I///// ,.,,.,.,.,., 1/////, //,//,'/ ,,.,.,.,., ///// /,','// ,,,.,.,.,. '////'• ,,.,.,..~ ,. • ; / ~ /// / /' /// ,. / .I // ,. / // // ,. ,. // ·,.,. \~ .I ,, / -~/ '" ~ I.{) - / -c.,, - ...... -(X) \ ' SF, 1 RA, 2 IP, 400 11P,30G,1VM, 1 RA 3 TOG, 2 OG, 1 S 3NR,2S 1 C, 2SN, 3 S (1 DEAD) 500, 1 C, 1 S 200, 2 NR rn ';j' CD CD -m I N 0 LJ N Sheet E -3 8 17 --~ ~ <<<< {i\ ' I I....,. , 'C"""\ \..._) \ 16 15 14 ''''''" ~ ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, '~>>>>>'''~''''''''''''''' "'' ' ---r. -.._._,,_,.,, ' "' ' ' ' ._ /-:~~~~;~~~< \ 6;(._ ' " ' ' ' ' ' '<·~,:>.'.'· ''''''-'' ·,'s'-.,·i ' ·, '' ''''' '-.'~'-; "''''"' ........ ,,,.'","-.'. '''''''''"v,.'Y . "' ,,,,,,,,t-..,~ ,,,,,,,,, .. ,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, '~-... ,,,,,,,,· '' ' ' ''~ < It--, " ~ ' '' ' ''' ''' '''''' ''''' < +-, '" ''' ''' ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''Vf.''...ct ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,~r,:,11,~R"li.,......"'-I ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, -. _.. .. ' ~, ~' , > > > > > :::r,, .. ,¥ I - .->" ~ ) 1 l 3 TOG, 1 DF, 1 VM, 3 IP, 8 S, 11 OG, 4 NR, 6 SF, 3 DS, 1 BC f;I ,It 1/ 4 S, 3 NR, 3 TOG, 2 C, 4 OG, 4 SN, 1 SF I I u I ' ,,, I/ I J 11 ;J l 3 BC, 3 IP, 6 OG, 3 DS, 2 RFC, 2 S -- Cedar River Corporate As-Built 2U VENDOR AGREEMENT Cedar River Corporate Park &i TARRAGON Wetland Mitigation Northwest Landscape Services This Vendor Agreement is made this ____ . day of , 2008 (the "Agreement") by and between the parties named below with respect to the Property commonly known as "Cedar River Corporate Park," 2200 Lind Avenue Southwest in Renton, Washington (the "Property"): Owner: ·. Tarragon -Cedar River Corporate Park L.L.C. I 000 Second Ave Suite 3200 Seattle, WA 98104 Tel: 206-233-9600 Fax: Contact: Contact: E-Mail: Tel: Fax: Vendor: Contact: E-Mail: Tel: Fax: Federal Taxpayer ID: UBI No.: Industrial Insurance No.: Subcontractor License No.: Liability Insurance Policy No.: 206-233-0260 Tarragon L.L.C., Owner's Manager I 000 Second Ave Suite 3200 Seattle. WA 98104 Charlie Foushee -Assoc. Development Manager cfoushee@tarragon.com 206-233-9600 206-233-0260 Northwest Landscape Services of Washington L.L.C. PO Box 864 Woodinville, WA 98072 Tom DcMieco -Managing Partner tornd@nlswa.com 425-481-0919 425-485-9601 91-1372383 602 741 247 572,880-01 NORTHLS937PQ Exp. 12/13/2009 Exp. ---- Certificate of Insurance Received/ Approved: Completed Form W-9 Received/Approved: Site Safety Plan, ifrequired Received/Approved: / Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) Received/Approved: / Tarragon Job #: DEV J.,.NNiNG TON JED Commitment #: A. WORK. I. DESCRIPTION OF WORK. Vendor agrees to furnish all required labor, material, supplies, supervision, transportation, licenses, insurance, taxes and pennits as required by federal, state and local jurisdictions in perfonning the work as described hereto as Exhibit A for the Property as described and delineated in Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference (the ··work"'). Vendor acknowledges and agrees that Vendor is fully familiar with all tenns, obligations and conditions under which the Work is to be performed. Vendor shall examine the site and any surfaces upon which work is to be performed, and shall notify the General Contractor in writing of any conditions which might adversely affect its work. Failure to do so shall constitute a waiver of entitlement to any additional compensation or change in schedule arising out of such conditions. By commencing work on the site and any surfaces upon which the Work is :tobe:performed, the Vendor warrants that all such areas are acceptable and suitable to the.Vendor and for the performance of its. Work. Vend or warrants that it is entering into this Agreement based upon Vendor's investigation of all such matters, and is in no way relying upon opinions or representations of Owner. 2. CHANGES IN THE WORK (CHANGE ORDERS). The Owner, without invalidating the Agreement, may order extra work or make changes by altering, adding to or deducting from the Work, the Contract Price and/or Schedule. When a change results in the addition of cost to the base Contract Price, a Change Order must be signed by both parties before any work on the alteration is started and before any Payment may be made for such work. 3. INDEPENDENT INSPECTION. At any time and without notice to Vendor, Owner may elect to utilize the services of an independent inspection service to ensure, monitor and verify quality of the Work, and compliance with all city, county, state and federal ordinances, laws, and regulations. Vendor acknowledges and agrees that it shall be required, without additional cost to Owner, to adhere to any and all recommendations made pursuant to such inspection. I. INSPECTIONS. Vendor shall bear the responsibility for the scheduling of inspections with the City or other governing authorities, if applicable, for the Work and for notifying the Owner's Manager of impending inspections at the time the inspection is scheduled. If the Vendor is not prepared for a scheduled inspection, then Vendor will be responsible for the cost of any re-inspection fees that may result there from. Additionally, Vendor will be required to pay any additional fees for inspections performed outside of normal working hours of the applicable inspection authority. B. TERM. This Vendor Agreement shall be in effect commencing on , 2008 and terminating on , 20_, unless terminated earlier pursuant to Section K described below. Owner may terminate this Vendor Agreement upon ten (I 0) days written notice to Vendor without cause. C. FEES. I. VENDOR PRICE. Vendor shall be paid the sums as outlined in the Proposal/Scope of Work as shown in Exhibit A. Vendor Agreemenl /Wetland Mitigation~ lv'orthwest Landscape S('1·1·irrs Project/Job#: __ Page 2 of 17 2. PAYMENT. a) Vendor shall submit an invoice for payment on or before the 25th day of the month and shall include an executed "Conditional Waiver and Release' of Lien" attached as Exhibit D for the applicable progress payment. Invoices should be submitted to: Tarragon -Cedar River Corporate Park L.L.C. c/o Tarragon L.L.C, its Manager 1000 2"d A venue, Suite 3200 Seattle, Washington 98104 Attn: Charlie Foushee -Associate Development Manager b) Owner shall make progress payments for all sums properly included on the Vendor's invoice for the applicable Payment Period by the 25th day of the following month. c) Owner shall not be obligated to pay for additional work performed by Vendor without an authorized and approved Change Order signed by Owner and/or its Managing Agent. Payment for such additional work will be issued in the same manner as described above. 3. PAYMENTS WITHHELD. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Owner may withhold or nullify the whole or part of any payment to such extent as may be necessary to protect Owner from loss, liability or expense, including attorneys' fees and costs, on account of: a) Defective work not remedied b) Claims filed or reasonable evidence indicating probable filing of a claim c) Failure of Vendor to properly make payments to its subcontractors or for material, labor or fringe benefits d) A reasonable doubt that this Agreement can be completed for the balance then unpaid; or e) Damage to another contractor or subcontractor. When Owner has been satisfied, in its sole discretion, that the concerns raised above have been satisfactorily addressed, such amounts as are then due and owing for the Work completed by Vendor shall be paid or credited to Vendor. Under no circumstances will Vendor be entitled to recover any costs or receive any cash or credit attributable to work not completed by Vendor as a result of exercise by Owner of any right or remedy arising from Vendor's default. D. PERMITS. Vendor agrees to procure any and all permits which may be required by the applicable authorities for the service/products to be provided by the Vendor hereunder, at the expense of the Vendor. E. PERFORMANCE. I. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. Vendor shall perform the Work with due diligence and shall complete the Work in accordance with Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this Vendor Aiveement !Wetland Mitigation -Northwest Landscape Services Project/Job#: __ Page 3 of 17 reference, as the same may be modified from time to time, in writing, by Owner. Vendor shall not hinder or delay other contractors, vendors or material suppliers from completing their work. 2. SCHEDULING OF WORK. Vendor shall contact the Owner's Manager for approval before making any delivery of material or equipment, or commencing the Work. F. WAIVER AND RELEASE OF LIEN. Vendor shall be required to disclose to Owner the names of any and all material suppliers and/or subcontractors. used in completion of the Work. Owner shall have the right to make any payments to Vendor under this Agreement by joint check to the Vend.or and any of its materials suppliers, subcontractors or laborers. Vendor expressly agrees to keep the Property free from any and all liens that may be filed in connection with services ;performed by Vendor or its suppliers in association of any Work performed on the Property, and shall defend and hold Owner harmless there from. G. SAFETY AND HAZARDOUS MA TE RIALS. I. SAFE SITE. Vendor shall at all times during the performance of the Work maintain competent on-site supervision. and at all times be responsible for the safety of all personnel, equipment, and materials within the Vendor's care, custody or control . The safety of any persons affiliated with this Property is the highest priority to the Owner. a) All employees of the Vendor are required to wear protective gear required for Vendor's safe completion of the Work and as set forth in Vendor's Safety Plan and/or the Owner's Safety Manual. b) The Subcontractor will provide its own Safety Plan before commencing work in this project. c) Vendor shall explicitly instruct all individuals in all safety requirements and ensure that no person shall work in any unsafe condition or manner. Vendor shall take all necessary safety precautions pertaining to its work and the conduct thereof, including but not limited to, compliance with all applicable law, ordinances, rules regulations and orders issued by a public authority, whether federal, state, local or other, the Occupational Safety and Health Act, the Washington Industrial Safety and Health Act, and any safety measures requested by Owner/Owner's Manager. d) Vendor shall, at all times be responsible for providing a safe work site and be responsible for the safety of all personnel, equipment, and materials within Vendor's care, custody or control. Vendor shall immediately provide Owner with written notice of any safety hazard or violation found anywhere on or adjacent to the construction site Property. Further, if Owner is assessed a fine due to any unsafe job site condition for which Vendor has assumed responsibility under this paragraph, Vendor shall immediately reimburse General Owner the amount of such fine. 3. DRUGS AND ALCOHOL PROHIBJTED. Vendor acknowledges that Owner has a policy prohibiting the use of controlled substances, drugs, or alcoholic beverages of any kind prior to and/or during working hours, either on Owner's Property or any other location while acting as an agent for Owner. Failure to comply or cause compliance with this paragraph shall constitute a breach of this Agreement by Vendor and shall be grounds for immediate termination orthis Agreement by Owner. Vendor Agreement /U-'etland Mitigation -Northwest Landscape Services Project/Job#. Page 4 of 17 3. CLEAN AND ORDERLY WORK SITE. a) Owner will not tolerate pets or children on the site. Vehicles are to be only parked in designated parking areas during while Vendor is performing its Work, and shall not enter or park on driveways or off road at any time. b) At all times during the completion of the Work, Vendor shall maintain the work area in a clean, safe and orderly condition and shall at all times keep the premises free from accumulations of debris, waste materials, scrap or rubbish caused by its work. The burning of any material or debris on the Property is prohibited. Vendor shall routinely arrange and remove all rubbish, tools, surplus materials and other articles from and about the buildings and Property, as to never create a saf~ty hazard, and shall leave its work in a "broom clean" condition at all times. In tli~ event Vendor fails to remove its property, Owner, at its option and without waivef:of,other rights, may treat all such property as abandoned. Vendor shall upon request of Owner immediately return to any area of the job and do such work as is necessary to comply with the provisions of this paragraph. If Vendor fails to do so, Owner may perform the work and charge back the cost to the Vendor. 4. HAZARDOUS WASTE. Vendor shall not cause or permit, and shall take every care to prevent any production, deposit, disposal or spill of hazardous substances during performance of this Agreement. In the event that any hazardous wastes are generated on the work site by Vendor, its agents. employees, subcontractors or invitees, Vendor shall, at its sole cost, remove such waste daily and shall be solely responsible for transport, storage and disposal in accordance with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, Hazardous Materials Transportation Act and all other similar federal, state and local laws and regulations as now or hereafter enacted or amended. Unused portions of hazardous substances shall not be stored on the work site but shall be removed daily by Vendor and properly handled in accordance with all applicable laws. Vendor shall indemnify and hold harmless the Owner from any claims, costs, damages, fines and attorneys' fees and costs, for both defense and for establishing the Owner's right of indemnification, arising out of or in any way related to the handling, use, transport, storage or disposal of hazardous substances by Vendor, its agents, employees, subcontractors or invitees in the course of the performance of this Agreement. The term "hazardous substances" shall be as defined by the Superfund Act (Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended) and shall include any similar definition of a substance subject to similar control by state or local law, including petroleum and petroleum products. 4. HAZARDOUS COMMUNICA T!ON AND SAFETY STANDARDS. a) Vendor shall comply with all provisions, safety standards and specific safety requirements of Owner and of any federal, state or local authority, including, without limitation, the requirements of the Occupational Safety Health Act of 1970, (including, the Hazardous Communication Standard, "HCS") the Construction Safety Act of 1969 or similar laws and regulations as now enacted or hereafter enacted and amended. Vendor Agreemenr !Wetland Mitigation Northwest Landscape Sen-ices Project/Job#: __ Page 5 of 17 b) Vendor shall provide Owner with appropriate Material Safety Data Sheets (M.S.D.S.) prior to delivering a hazardous chemical to a work site. In the event that Vendor's work materials do not require an M.S.D.S. and no hazardous substance are to be used on the worksite, Vendor shall so certify, in writing, to Owner. c) Owner may at any time during the performance of this Agreement prohibit the delivery or demand the immediate removal of any such hazardous substances, which prohibition shall be immediately effective upon notification by Owner to Vendor. Failure of Owner to prohihit the delivery or to demand the removal of any one or more hazardous substances shall not relieve Vendor of its responsibilities and obligations under this Agreement. d) Any hazardous substances hrought onto the worksite shall be handled and used in accordance with product specifications and in full compliance with all applicable laws. In the event of a spill or release of a reportable quantity of a hazardous substance Vendor shall immediate! y notify the Owner's Manager. Vendor shall be responsible for statutory reporting and shall bear all costs forclean up. H. VENDOR EMPLOYEES. 5. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT. Vendor shall at its own expense conform to the equal employment opportunity policies of Owner, if applicable, and shall comply with all equal employment opportunity requirements promulgated by any governmental authority including, without limitation, the requirements of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and any other statutes or ordinances, plans or programs, inclusive, and all successors and amendments thereto, and all plans, programs, standards and regulations which have been or shall be promulgated or approved by the parties or agencies which administer said acts or orders (herein collectively referred to as EEO laws). 6. COMPLIANCE. Vendor shall have and exercise full responsibility for compliance with EEO laws by itself, its agents, employees, materialmen and subcontractors with respect to the Work, and shall directly receive, respond to, defend and be responsible for any citation, assessment, fine or penalty by reason of Vendor's failure or failure of Vendor's agents, employees, materialmen and subcontractors to so comply with EEO laws. Vendor shall defend and indemnify and hold Owner harmless from and against any liability, loss, damage, cost, claims, awards, judgments, fines, expenses, including litigation expenses, reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, claims or liability for harm to persons or property, expenses incurred pursuant to or attendant to any hearing or meeting and any other applicable cost which may be incurred by Owner resulting from Vendor's failure to fulfill the requirements set forth in this paragraph. 7. NONCOMPLIANCE. In the event Vendor fails to comply with (a) any citation issued by the Washington State Department of Labor & Industries, Secretary of Labor, any order issued by the Occupational Safety and Health review commission, the Environmental Protection Agency, or of any other body responsible for the administration and/or enforcement of any statute regulation or ordinance relating to occupational health and safety or environmental regulations, including, without limitation, the HCS, within the period specified in any such citation or order; or (b) with any of the aforementioned EEO or EPA laws, or any judgment, order or award issued by the Office of Federal Contract Compliance, United States Department of Labor, or any other federal, state or local Vendor Agreement !Wetland Mitigation lVorthwest Landscape Services Project/Job#. Page 6 of 17 agency or any court of law, or any other body responsible for the administration and/or enforcement of any EEO or EPA laws, with the period specified by such law, judgment, order or award, Owner may, at its discretion, exercise the rights and remedies provided under this Agreement. 8. PAYROLL OBLIGATIONS. Vendor is an independent contractor for all purposes and is solely responsible for all payroll taxes, deductions and contributions under federal or state laws. Vendor shall defend and indemnify Owner againstliability for the payment of any and all contributions or taxes for unemployment insurance, old age retirement benefits, pensions or annuities, or wage or income taxes, now or hereafter imposed by federal, state or political subdivision thereof, whether measured by the wages, salaries or other remuneration g,iid to any persons employed by or performing any work on behalf of Vendor. In the event that Owner is compelled by reason mf lien claim or union requirement to make any payments directly to any employees of Vendor whom Vendor has failed to pay, sudh payments shall be made from the account of the Vendor, as the employer, and Vendor agrees as such employer to prepare and file such returns with respect to said payment as might be required under federal or state law, and to pay any taxes attributable to such payments. 9. UNION OBLIGATIONS. In the event the Vendor is party to or bound by any Agreement with a labor union or related entity, Vendor shall comply with all warranties, obligations, rules, regulations, terms, conditions and responsibilities which are or may be imposed upon Owner or any of its contractors or material suppliers pursuant to such Agreement. Vendor's obligations hereunder shall include but not be limited to making payments to all health, welfare, pension, vacation or apprenticeship trust funds. Vendor shall obtain from any subcontractor a representation and agreement for the benefit of Owner binding such subcontractor to comply with the provisions of this paragraph. In the event of the Vendor or any of its subcontractors are delinquent in payment of any obligation to any labor union or related entity under this paragraph, Owner shall have the further right to pay the amounts so deducted directly to the appropriate entity. Vendor hereby expressly authorizes Owner to act as its agent for that purpose. Further, Vendor will indemnify and hold Owner harmless from any loss, liability, expense or claim, including attorneys' fees and costs, from any failure of Vendor to fulfill its obligations under this paragraph. The failure of Vendor to fulfill its obligations under this paragraph shall be deemed an Event of Default. I. INSURANCE. Prior to commencement of the Work, Subcontractor shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect during the term thereof: at Subcontractor's sole expense, the insurance coverage described in Exhibit C attached hereto. 1. PROOF OF INSURANCE. Current proof of insurance shall be provided to the Owner and Owner's Manager in the form of Certificate and Policy Endorsements. Neither acknowledgement nor approval of the insurance by the General Contractor or Owner shall relieve or decrease the liability of the Vendor hereunder. 2. NOTICE OF CANCELLATION. If any such insurance is cancelled or due to expire during the Agreement period, the Subcontractor shall not permit the insurance coverage to lapse, shall furnish evidence to the General Contractor and Owner, and shall provide at least 45 days written notice to the Owner/Owner's Manager of cancellation of any such insurance. Vendo1· Agreement !Wetland Mitigation -Northwest Landscape Sen ices Project/Job#: __ Page 7 of 17 J. INDEMNIFICATION. I. GENERALLY. Vendor specifically and expressly agrees to defend, indemnify and save harmless Owner, its officers, agents and employees against any and all loss, damage, suits, liability, claims, demands or costs resulting from injury or harm to persons or property, including claims of Vendor's own employees, arising out of or in any way connected to Vendor's performance hereunder. In the event of the concurrent negligence of Vendor and Owner, Owner shall be liable only to the extent of Owner's concurrent negligence. Vendor's activities shall be deemed to include those of its officers, agents, subcontractors and material suppliers. 2. MUTUAL NEGOTIATION. Vendor specifically acknowledges that thisindernnity was mutually negotiated :by the parties herein. In the event oflitigation between the parties to enforce the rights under this paragraph, reasonable attorneys' fees shall be allowed to the prevailing party. 3. INCLUSIONS. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Vendor's indemnity includes claims caused by the use, misuse or failure of any vehicle, rigging, blocking, scaffolding or other things used by Vendor, even though such vehicle, rigging, blocking, scaffolding or other things be rented, loaned or furnished to Vendor by Owner. The defense and indemnity obligation specifically applies to operations in close proximity to power lines and other utilities. 4. W AIYER. Vendor specifically and expressly waives any immunity that it may have under the Industrial Insurance Act, Title 51 RCW, and acknowledges that this waiver was mutually negotiated by the parties herein. Vendor's Initials Owner's Initials ------------ K. VENDOR DEFAULT AND OWNER REMEDIES. I. GENERALLY. In the event that Vendor (a) at any time refuses or neglects to supply a sufficient number of properly skilled workers or a sufficient quantity of materials of proper quality, or (b) is adjudicated as bankrupt, or files an arrangement proceeding, or commits any act of insolvency, or makes an assignment for benefit of creditors without Owner's consent, or (c) fails to make prompt payment to its material suppliers and laborers, or (d) fails in any respect to properly and diligently prosecute the Work, or (e) otherwise fails to fully perform any of its obligations herein contained (each of which shall be referred as an "Event of Default"), Owner may at its option: (i) after giving forty-eight ( 48) hours written notice to Vendor, provide any such labor and materials as may be necessary to fulfill V cndor · s obligations hereunder and deduct the cost thereof from any money then due or thereat1er to become due to Vendor for completed Work; or (ii) terminate Vendor's right to proceed with the Work. In the event Owner exercises options (i) or (ii) above, Owner shall have the right to enter upon the premises of the job and, for the purpose of completing the Work, take possession of all materials and employ any other person or persons to finish the Work and provide the materials therefore. In case of termination of Vendor· s right to proceed with the Work, Vendor shall not be entitled to receive any further payment under this Agreement until the Work undertaken by Owner is completely finished. At that time, if the unpaid balance of the amount to be Vendor Agreement lft'etland Mitigation Northwesr Landscape Services Project/Job#: __ Page 8 of 17 paid for Work completed by V cndor under this Agreement exceeds the expenses incurred by Owner in finishing Vendor"s Work ("Owner's Completion Expenses"), such excess shall be paid by Owner to Vendor; but, if Owner's Completion Expenses shall exceed such unpaid balance for Work completed by Vendor before termination by Owner, then Vendor shall promptly pay to Owner the amount by which Owner's Completion Expenses exceed such unpaid balance. Owner's Completion Expenses shall include expenses incurred by Owner for furnishing materials, finishing the work, attorneys' fees and any damages sustained by Owner by reason of Vendor's default, plus a markup of 15% general overhead and 10% profit on any and all such expenses, and Owner shall have a lien upon all materials taken possession of, to secure the payment thereof. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Owner shall have the right to terminate this Agreement at any time for any reason, in which case the Vendor shall .not be entitled to any compensation for the loss of any anticipated profit or income but shall be entitled to payment of the applicable Agreement Price based upon a percentage of completion of the Work performed prior to the date of termination as determined by Owner in its sole and absolute discretion. 2 REMEDY. The remedies set forth herein shall be cumulative and in addition to any other remedies provided by law. Owner shall be entitled to pursue any and all remedies available at law or in equity to compensate Owner for any damages, including costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees. sustained by reason of failure of Vendor to perform its obligations under this Agreement. L. MISCELLANEOUS. I. LICENSE. Vendor shall hold a proper and valid business license in conformity with the requirements of the City of Renton, State of Washington or any other applicable jurisdiction in which the Work is being performed. 2. TITLE AND RISK OF LOSS. Title to all materials and/or fixtures shall be deemed vested in Owner when, and as the same shall have been installed or otherwise affixed permanently to the realty on the job. Owner shall not be liable for loss or damage to any material or fixtures as to which title is not then vested in Owner at the time of such loss or damage as herein provided, whether such material or fixtures are on the site, in transit, under the control of Owner or otherwise. 3. FORCE MAJEURE. If as a result of fire, earthquake, act of God, war, strikes, picketing, boycotting, lock outs, government, judicial or administrative order or other causes beyond the control of Owner, Owner deems it advisable not to proceed with the Work, Owner may at its option give written notice thereof to Vendor to discontinue any further Work until such time as Owner deems it advisable that the Work be resumed. Owner may, at its option, in the alternative terminate this Agreement. Vendor shall not be entitled to any damages or compensation because of such cessation of Work or termination of this Agreement. In the event of termination, Owner's sole obligation hereunder shall be to pay for the reasonable value of Work performed or materials accepted up to that date, not exceeding the Agreement Prices, for such portion completed by Vendor. Vendor shall continue to be liable on warranties and indemnities under this Agreement. Such cessation or termination shall not preclude Owner's right to withhold sums then owing to Vendor to protect Owner from loss on account of matters hereinabove referred to in this Agreement. Vendor Agreement /Welland Mitigation -llforthwest Landscape Services Project/Job#: __ Page Y of 17 4. ASSIGNMENT OF AGREEMEKT. Vendor shall not, without the prior written consent of Owner, assign, transfer or sublet any portion or part of the Work, or assign any payments hereunder or this Agreement to others. Owner may assign or transfer the whole or part of this Agreement and its rights hereunder. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the parties hereto. 5. WANER. The waiver, expressly or by implication, by Owner of any provision of this Agreement at any time shall not operate as or be deemed fo constitute a future or further waiver by Owner of any right or remedy reserved to Owner under any provision of this Agreement. 6. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding and agreement of the parties. All prior estimates, bids, proposals, statements, representations and agreements are merged herein and superseded hereby. Vendor has not relied upon any statement, representation or agreement not set forth in this Agreement. 7. NOTICES. Any notice, demand, request, consent, approval .or communication that either party desireSA)r is required to give to the other party or a.riy,::other person shall be in writing and either served ·personally or sent by registered or certified United States mail, or by overnight courier or by facsimile transmission (collectively, "Notice"). Any Notice shall be addressed to the other party at the address appearing on the first page of this Agreement. Notice shall be deemed communicated within three (3) business days from the time of deposit in the United States mail if mailed as provided in this paragraph, or upon delivery or refusal of delivery if delivered personally or by overnight courier or upon confirmation of receipt by machine or verified personally if delivered by facsimile. Although either party shall have the right to change its address for notice purposes from time to time, any notice delivered pursuant to this paragraph to the address set forth on the first page of this Agreement or to such other addresses as may be hereafter specified in writing in accordance with this paragraph shall be effective even if actual delivery cannot be made as a result of a change in the address of the recipient of such notice if the party delivering the notice has not received actual written notice in accordance with the provisions of this paragraph of the current address to which notices are sent. 8. ARBITRATION AND INDEMNITY. Any dispute, controversy, or claim arising out of or in connection with, or relating to this Agreement or any breach or alleged breach hereof, shall, at the sole written election of Owner, be submitted to, and resolved by, binding arbitration. The arbitration shall be conducted by the American Arbitration Association ("AAA") and pursuant to its Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures. The pool of potential arbitrators shall be limited to arbitrators residing in King County, Washington and that the arbitration proceeding shall be before one neutral arbitrator appointed by the AAA. The arbitration shall take place in Seattle, Washington. The substantially prevailing party is entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including attorneys' fees and arbitration fees and expenses, as determined by the arbitrator. Where there is any common question of law or fact, Owner at its sole discretion, may join third parties to this arbitration, join Vendor to another arbitration involving Owner and a third party, and/or consolidate another arbitration proceeding with this arbitration. Vendor Agreement /Wetland Mitigation -Northwest Landscape Srnices Project/Job#: __ Page !Oofl7 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and sealed this Agreement as of the date set forth below. OWNER: TARRAGON-CEDAR RIVER CORPORATE PARK L.L.C. By: TARRAGON L.L.C., Its Manager Name: Its: Date: ----------- VENDOR: NORTHWEST LANDSCAPE SERVICES OF WASHINGTON L.L.C. By: ------------ Name: Its: Date: ----------- LIST OF EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT A: EXHIBITB: EXHIBITC: EXHIBITD: EXHIBITE: PROPOSAL/SCOPE OF WORK PROPERTY MAP/SITE PLAN INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS LIEN RELEASE FOR'vl WETLAND BUFFER MITIGATION PLAN Vendor Agreement !Wetland Mitigation -Northwest Landscape Se1Tices Project/Job#:_ Page 1 I of !7 Property: Vendor: Work: EXHIBIT A PROPOSAL/SCOPE OF WORK Cedar River Corporate Park, 2200 Lind Avenue Southwest, Renton, WA Northwest Landscape Services Wetland Mitigation Replant, Split Rail Fence and Signage The Vendor shall provide all supervision, equipment, labor, plants, materials, tools and transportation to perform the above referenced work. Work shall be accomplished in accordance with industry standards and per the terms and general conditions set fmih in this Agreement. The Vendor shall plant wetland plants per the Cedar River Corporate Park Wetland Buffer Mitigation Plan prepared by Wetland Permitting Services and dated April 16, 2007 (attached Exhibit E), as well as furnish and install 1,800 linear feet split rail fence and wetland signage as described in the mitigation plan. Total Fee ...................................................................................................................................... $30,972.00 End of Exhibit A Vendor Agreement !Wetland Mitigation -Northwest Lands.cape Scrrices Project/Job #. Page 12 of /7 EXHIBIT B PROPERTY MAP I SITE PLAN Vendor Agreement /Wetland Mitigation -Northwest Landscape Sen·iccs Project/Job#: __ \ Page 13 of 17 EXHIBITC INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Before commencing work, the Subcontractor shall furnish the Owner and Owner's Manager evidence that the following insurance is in force and will cover all operations under the Subcontractor Agreement. A copy of the insurance policy's specific endorsement(s), waiver of subrogation and additional insured wording shall be submitted along with the current and original Certificate of Insurance. Vendors Liability Insurance: All insurance carriers used .shall have a Best Rating of AV or better. I. Workers Compensation: Contingent Employers Liability (Washington Stop Gap) withminimumlimits of: • $1,000,000 eachaccidcnt • $1,000,000 Disease Policy Limit • $1,000,000 Disease Each Employee Vendor shall secure its liability for industrial injury to its employees in accordance with the provisions of Title 51 ·of the Revised Code of Washington. Managing Agent shall be responsible for confirming compliance with this provision through the Department of Labor & Industries website. II. Commercial General Liability ISO Occurrence Form CGOOOl • Premises-Operations • Independent Vendors • Products-Completed Operations • Broad Form Property Damage • Contractual Liability (Hold Ham1less Coverage) • Per Property Aggregate Combined single limits Bodily Injury and Property Danrnge: • $1,000,000 Each Occurrence • $1,000,000 Personal & Advertising Injury Limit • $2,000,000 Products/Completed Operations Limit • $2,000,000 General Aggregate Limit Coverage shall name Owner and its Managing Agents as Primary Additional Insured (ISO Form CG2010 11/85; CG2037 or equivalent, CG2015 vendors endorsement), and such coverage shall be non-contributory with respect to any insurance carried by the Owner, its Agents and Managing Agents and shall include '·Completed Operations For Your Work". The following shall be named additional insured: Tarragon-Cedar River Corporate Park L.L.C. as Owner, Tarragon L.L.C. as Manager, and Tarragon Construction L.L.C. as General Contractor. Vendor Agreement !Wetland Mitigation Northwest Landscape SPrvices Projec1/Job #: __ Page l4ofl7 III. Umbrella Liability Insurance Limits of Insurance: • $1,000,000 Each Occurrence • $1,000,000 Aggregate • $10,000 Maximum Self~ Insurance Retention IV. Automobile Liability (Owned, Non-owned, Hired or Leased) • $1,000,000 Combined Single Limit Bodily Injury and Prqperty Damage V. Environmental Services If the work to be performed involves hazardous materials or pollution or other environmental services, the requirement of Pollution Liability Insurance shall be required. Minimum Limits of Liability: • $5,000,000 Each Occurrence • $5,000,000 Aggregate VIII. Additional requirements for All Insurance Required All policies shall contain a waiver of subrogation (also referred to as Transfer of Rights of Recovery against Others) ISO Form CG 2404; and Per Property Aggregate CG2503; or equivalents. Any major exclusion added by endorsement which may restrict coverage as respects this Property shall be identified. The work to be performed shall be clearly identified on the certificate of insurance under "Description of Work to be Performed", and shall include the Job: Cedar River Corporate Park. Notice of Cancellation: Certificates of Insurance and required endorsements shall be filed with the Owner or its Managing Agents prior to commencement of work. The insurance shall be maintained for the life of the Agreement (including maintenance and/or guarantee periods) as stated above and shall contain a provision that coverage will not be materially changed, cancelled or allowed to lapse without 45 days written notice to the Owner, its Managing Agents. Such cancellation clause shall have the wording "shall endeavor" and "but failure to do so shall impose no obligation or liability of any kind upon the insurer, its managing agents" deleted. Vendor's subcontractors shall be bound to Owner and its Managing Agents to the same extent Vendor is bound to Owner and its Managing Agents and shall provide upon request such certificates as set forth including all required endorsement forms. Vendor Ag1·eemen1 ;Wetland Mitigation -Northwest Landscape SC'rvices Project/Job#:~~ Page 15 of 17 EXHIBIT D INTERIM LIEN/CLAIM WAIVER From: Address: Contact Person: Contact Telephone: CONDITIOI\AL RELEASE The undersigned does hereby acknowledge that upon receipt by the undersigned of a checkftom the above rci'ercnced job in the sum of$ and -when the check has been properly endorsed and has been paid by the bank upon which it was drawn, this document shall become effective to release pro tanto any and all claims. actions. and rights or lien arising from or related to the,abovc referenced job. This release covers a progress payment for labor, services. equipment. materials furnished, and/or cl.iims through (date) ____ _ and does not cover any retention or items furnished after that date. Before any recipient of this document relies on it said party should verify evidence of payment to the undersigned. I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PER.JURY l'NIJl'R LAWS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTOJ\ TIIA"I THE ABO VF IS A TRUE AND CORRECT STATEMENT. Signature: Authorized Corporate Officer/Partner Title Dated this day of __________ . 200g at: Subscribed and sworn before me day and year first above written: By:----------------~ Notary Public for _______________ _ Vendor Agreement !Wetland Mitigation -Northwest La,u/;;capc Savices Project/Job#: __ Project Name: Address: UNCONDITIONAL RELEASE The undersigned does hereby acknowledge that the undersigned has received progress payments in the sum of '$ for labor, services, equipment or materials furnished _to the above referenced job and hereby releases pro tanto,aqy:>and all-Claims, actions, and rights of lien arising from or related to the above referenced job. The undersigned acknowledges full payment for all labor, services, equipment, materials furnished. and/or claims, actions, and rights of lien arising from or related to the above referenced job through (date) . This release does not cover any retention or items furnished after that date. NOTICE: THIS DOCUMENT WAIVES RIGHTS UNCONDITIONALLY AND STATES THAT YOU HAVE BEEN PAID FOR GIVING UP THOSE RIGHTS. THIS DOCUMENT IS ENFORCEABLE AGAINST YOU IF YOU SIGN IT, EVEN IF YOU HAVE NOT BEEN PAID. IF YOU HAVE NOT BEEN PAID, USE A CONDITIONAL RELEASE FORM. I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER LAWS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON THAT TIIE ABOVE IS A TRUE AND CORRECT STATEMENT. Signature: Authorized Corporate Officer/Partner Title Dated this day of _________ . 2008 at: Subscribed and sworn before me day and year first above written: By: Notary Public for _______________ _ Page /6 of /7 EXHIBIT E WETLAND BUFFER MITIGATION PLAN (attached) Vendor Agreement /Wetland Mitigation Northwest Landscape ScniCl's Project/Job#. Page/7ofl7 Wetland Buffer Mitigation Plan 300 S. 160TH STREET Cedar River Corporate Park Parcel#: 3340400285 & 3023059083 RENTON, WASHINGTON Prepared for: Murphy M°Cullough Tarragon Development 1000 Second Avenue Suite 3200 Seac~le, WA 98104 (206) 233-9600 Prepared by: ~F.T.F.S'T'F: BOTHA WF;TLAJ::ID 0 EEMITTTNG SEBYIGF,S 2025 South Norman Street (206) 328-7775 wps@isp.com April 16, 2007 Executive Summary This report presents a mitigation plan for buffer impacts resulting from proposed development of the 12.57-acre site, Parcels 3340400285 & 3023059083, is located between Lind Avenue South and East Valley Road, south of SW 19 111 Street in Renton, Washington. SW 21 51 Street is located to the north and SW 23'd Street to tbe south; however, both of these street ROWs bave been abandoned (Figure I, Vicinity Map) .. 11 : I j/7 ~~:. -~ Figure l: Vicinity Map Site Description The site is currently undeveloped. A fire station is located north of the northwest property corner (Parcel #3340400425), a commercial development is located to the east between the subject parcel and the East Valley Road; and a gas line is located on the parcel to the south, within the abandoned SW 23'd Street ROW (Parcel # 3023059083). The parcel is nearly rectangular, with a "panhandle" at the northeast corner. The site was filled prior to 1970 with from 7-lo JO.feet of dense fill material. Scrubby trees and shrubs have since become established on the site. The southeast corner and a narrow band around the entire site are forested. The interior of the site is mostly scrubby; tree species have generally not reached 20 feet or greater. Two mapped wetlands nearly surround the site; a large wetland lies lo the north and a smaller wetland wraps around the east and south property boundary. These wetlands have been included in numerous previous inventories, including the City of Renton's Rivers, Streams & Wetlands inventory. An unnamed tributary of Springbrook Creek is located on the adjacent parcel to the south, south of the abandoned SW 23'd Street ROW. Proposed Impacts No impacts are proposed to wetlands on the subject site. However, permanent impacts will occur from construction of two bio-filtration swales within the buffers of Wetlands A and B, as shown on the storm drain plans. In addition, temporary impacts will result from the placement of an additional two to five feet of fill on the site. This will require some clearing within the buffer because some of the fill material will spill onto the wetland buffer along the south and east boundaries as well as north of the northern bio-fil!ration swale. Finally, rain gardens will be constructed within the northern wetland buffer. All of these areas are forested with deciduous trees averaging approximately IO inch DBH. Impacts are illustrated on Figure 2, next page. Area totals for each type of impact are also shown below in Table 1: Table 1: Wetland Buffer Impacts ----- Impact Type Impact Area Permanent Impacts (Bio/iltration Swales) 3,729 SF Temporary Buffer Impacts 11,358 SF Rain Garden 12,307 SF Final Buffer Mitigation Plan The following mitigation plan is designed to mitigate for permanent impacts resulting from the biofiltration swales and for temporary impacts due to clearing and placement of additional fill material in wetland buffers. No mitigation is being required by the City of Renton for constrnction of the rain gardens within the buffer. Permanent impacts As described in the Conceptual Buffer Enhancement Plan prepared by WPS dated December 21, 2006, to compensate for permanent impacts pursuant to the proposed bio- filtration swales within the buffers, the applicant is proposing to plant 400 conifer seedlings, i.e. 300 Douglas fir and 100 western red cedar, within the 31,169 square feet of onsite undisturbed bnffer. The existing buffers are currently nearly devoid of coniferous trees, so this proposal will result in a significant habitat improvement to the wetlands and buffers. The seedlings will be distributed randomly throughout the undisturbed buffers. Given the existing vegetation to remain, the density of trees that will be planted is disproportionately great because attrition is expected due to the impracticability of irrigation or other maintenance activities. No monitoring of the plantings is practicable nor appropriate; it is anticipated that even if survivorship of as little as 30% of the total trees planted occurs, these trees will ultimately compensate for the total 3,729 square feet of permanent buffer impact area. \ ' /, I I I I I I I Lo,~ ! I: . ; i. I i '1 :,, I I I' j 1} I .-. . ' ' I I .\ \ -·,---,---, ·I :/: :. I", 'I ._ .I :1 [, . :c1 . I' I ,, ,'I I, . 'f ,; <>I ,, 1., .\Ji . !1 Temporary impacts As noted above, temporary impacts will occur as a result of placement of additional fill material spilling into the buffer. Because this will bury the roots of existing trees and shrubs, revegetation of these areas will be necessary. Construction Plan The following measures will be implemented to enhance survivorship of newly planted native species and to ensure that meas further down slope from the anticipated limits of construction are not affected. 1. In order to ensure that the implementation activities occur as intended, a pre- construction meeting will occur with the construction contractors and WPS prior to initiation of all construction activities. 2. The limits of construction will be established and marked by surveyors. 3. The project biologist will verify the construction limits in the field. 4. Two parallel silt fences will be installed, one at the limit of buffer impacts shown on the site plan and another 5 feet Curther clown slope in the wetland buffer. 5. Following installation of the silt fences, the temporary impact areas will be cleared. 6. Grading of the bioswales and rain gardens will occur and the structural fill will be applied within the temporary impacl areas and mechanically compacted. 7. An 8-to 12-inch layer of topsoil will be placed on top of the structural fill and lightly compacted prior to planting in temporary impact areas to enhance plant growth. 8. Planting will occur between the months of October and February per the attached Wetland Buffer Mitigation Planting Plan prepared by AHBL. 9. Following planting, 3 to 4 inches or "Animal Friendly Hog Fuel" (wood chips) obtained from Pacific Topsoils, or equivalent mulch will be applied throughout the temporary impact area to protect plants from weeds and to maintain soil moisture. Care will taken to keep the mulch three inches from the sterns of the plants to protect from insect and rodent damage. 10. Temporary drip irrigation capable of delivering at least 1 inch of water per week will be installed. 11. Five monitoring plots (i.e. five areas planted according to the Typical Disturbed Wetland Buffer Planting legend shown on the Wetland Buffer Mitigation Planting Plan, attached) will be identified in the field with permanent markers and photographs taken for comparison during monitoring events. 12. Permanent fencing will be installed and signs attached to fence posts at approximately 50-foot spacing along the buffer. Signs will be constructed of metal and state "Sensitive Area: Please protect and care for this area. Alteration or Disturbance is Prohibited by Law". 13. Mitigation measures will be implemented as needed to rectify any unauthorized construction impacts. 14. The first silt fence will be removed af1er one year and then a year later, the other, down slope silt fence, will be removed during the 3'd quarter maintenance visits. Planting Plan Following clearing, native trees and shrubs will be planted according to the attached Wetland Buffer Mitigation Planting Plan prepared by AHBL. Plant numbers, sizes and composition of ground covers are shown in Table 2. Plant spacing will be irregular and random per the planting plan. This will result in a total of 453 shrubs and 99 trees being planted within the temporary buffer impacts area. 704 hardy ground covers will also be planted per the planting plan. In addition, 400 conifer tree seedlings will be planted within the undisturbed buffer. Table 2: Planting Schedule within Wetland Buffer Areas Temporary Impact Area Common Name Botanical Name Number Trees Red alder A/nus rubra 15 Bitter cherry Prunus emarginata 41 Douglas fir Pseudotsuga menzeisii 20 Cascara Rhamnus purshiana 23 Shrubs Vine maple Acer circinatum 23 Tall Oregon grape Mahonia aquifo/ium 68 Indian plum Oemferia cerasiformis 68 Red-flowering currant Ribes sanguineum 45 Nootka rose Rosa nutkana 68 Red elderberry Sambucus racemosa 68 Douglas spirea Spiraea douglasii 68 Snow berry Symphoricarpos a/bus 45 Ground Covers Salal Gauftheria shaffon 227 Low Oregon grape Mahonia nervosa 273 Swordfern Pofystichum munitum 204 Permanent Impact Areas (within undisturbed buffer) Trees Douglas fir Western red cedar Pseudotsuga menzeisii Thuja plicata Performance Standards 300 100 Size 1 gal. 2 gal. 2 gal. 2 gal. 2 gal. 1 gal. 1 gal. 1 gal. 1 gal. 1 gal. 1 gal. 1 gal. 1 gal. 1 gal. 1 gal. Seedlings Seedlings When evaluated against monitoring data, performance standards are used to determine the relative success of the mitigation project. Failure to meet these general minimum standards throughout the monitoring period will result in implementation of contingency measures. • As noted above, because attrition is expected, planting density is exaggerated due to the impracticability of irrigation or other maintenance activities within the undisturbed buffer pursuant to mitigation for permanent bioswale impacts. Performance standards for the temporary impacts buffer enhancement area are shown below in Table 3. When evaluated against monitoring data, performance standards arc used to determine the relative success of the mitigation project. Failure to meet these general minimum standards throughout the monitoring period will result in compulsory implementation of contingency measures. Table 3: Performance Standards Criterion Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 --·--·--------~------" ---.. ----, --··-------.---- Native plant cover(%) 10 -20 20-30 30 -70 Native woody plant cover(%) (for forested or 10 -20 20 -30 40 -60 scrub-shrub areas) Nan-native, invasive plant caver (% ) Plant survivorship Species diversity Species diversity (see below) (see below) (see below) Year 4 Year 5 70 -90 100 60 -80 80 -85 The following minimum standards apply to species diversity of native plants, including both planted and volunteer species, within the various strata: • trees= 4 species, at least 1 of which must be coniferous • shrubs = 5 species • ground cover= 2 species Plant survivorship Plants are considered "dead" when more than 50% of the plant is decadent, with the exception of cottonwood, willow and red osier dogwood, which will be considered live if any part of the plant is living. Control of noxious, invasive and native species with a tendency to overwhelm Noxious weeds (identified on state noxious weeds lists) including giant and Japanese knotweeds (Polygonum ,;a~halinense, P cuspidatum) must be entirely and properly eliminated, and disposed of, from the site prior to installation, and throughout the monitoring period. Reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundh1C1ceae), Scot's broom (Cytisus scaparius), English ivy (Hedera helix), creeping buttercup (Ranuncu/us repens), and Himalayan and evergreen blackberries (Rubus discolor, R. laciniatus), must be eliminated prior to planting and thereafter strictly controlled and may not exceed l 0% total cover per species (i.e., up to 10% cover of each species may be allowed) tlmmghout the monitoring period. (Note: exception for reed canarygrass in areas with surrounding dense stands of reed canarygrass and dense mats of English ivy and creeping buttercup. In such cases, the objective is to provide habitat diversity with woody species by the encl of the monitoring period; three foot diameter planting holes will be cleared of all weeds prior to planting. Fences and Signs Fences and signs will be inspected during the maintenance visits and must be in good repair. Monitoring No monitoring of the seedling tree plantings within the undisturbed buffer area is practicable nor appropriate; it is anticipated that even if survivorship of as little as 30% of the total trees planted occurs, these trees will ultimately compensate for the total 3,729 square feet of permanent buffer impact area. Within the temporary impact/mitigation area monitoring shall continue for a minimum period of five years of successful monitoring, i.e. monitoring meeting the performance standards. An as-built drawing showing five (5) randomly-selected areas planted according to the "Typical Disturbed Welland Buffer Planting" (shown on the Planting Plan prepared by AHBL) will be prepared within one month of completion of planting. Thereafter monitoring will commence on the next quarter according lo the schedule below. Monitoring will consist of a direct plant count within these areas. Overview photos will be taken from the same vantage points each year to document overall appearance of the mitigation area before, during, and after construction, as well as of each of the sample plots. Photo points and sample plots shall be marked with stakes to facilitate relocation from one monitoring event to the next. Specifically, the monitoring protocol will consist of the following: • Evaluate plant cover and cover from undesirable species within the typical planting areas; • Evaluate survivorship through a direct plant count within typical planting areas; • Visually assess and record wildlife use. • Inspect all fences and signs Maintenance, monitoring and reporting will occur per the following schedule: Table 4: Maintenance & Monitoring Schedules Year Maintenance Visits Monitorinq Report due 1 Between January 1 and March 1 AND Between January 1 and March 1 AND March 30 Between April 1 and June 1 AND Between April 1 and June 1 AND June 30 Between July 1 and September 30 Between July 1 and September 30 October 30 Between October 15 and December 30 Between October 15 and December 30 January 31 ---- 2 -5 Between April 1 and June 1 AND Between September 1 and October 15 December 30 Between July 1 and September 30 Maintenance Plan Over the monitoring period, a rigorous qumterly maintenance program will be implemented as shown on Table 4 to eliminate undesirable plants and to protect shrubs and small trees from competition from weeds, repair or replace any buffer signage, replace dead plants, etc. Only organic fertilizers and chemicals will be used for maintenance purposes in the buffer. Examples of these include: corn gluten, Sluggo, Burnout Organic weed killer, Sharp Shooter organic insect killer, Perfect Blend Organic Fe1tilizer, and Essential Biostimulant. Chemicals will be applied by a licensed applicator. Fertilizer will be applied after the first year of planting and each year thereafter in the fa! I. Contingency Plan In order to provide for the contingency that performance standards may not be met during the five-year monitoring period, it may be necessary to provide supplemental plantings. Plant attrition can be remedied by evaluating the cause, and replanting with the same or a more appropriate and approved species. The landscaping contractor will guarantee l 00 percent survivorship for one year from initial planting for losses due to defects in materials or workmanship. All plants that are used for replacement must meet the standards of the initial plantings. The causes of any mortality will be evaluated, and based upon the results of this evaluation, alternate species selection may occur. Replacement will be subject to the same conditions and be made in the same manner as specified for the original planting. Mitigation Surety The City of Renton requires two surety devices: an installation device in the amount of 150% of the contracted cost of installation, and a maintenance security device in the amount of 125% of the contracted cost for maintenance and monitoring. The contracts must clearly state that structures, improvements and mitigation will perform satisfactorily for a minimum period of five years. Signed contracts f'or these services and a maintenance security device will be provided to the city prior to issuance of a fill and grade permit. Report Limitations Work for this project was performed, and this report prepared for, Tarragon Development, in accordance with generally accepted professional practices. A Firm Qualifications Statement for WPS is provided in Appendix I. This report is not meant to represent a legal opinion. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. APPENDIX 1: FIRM QUALIFICATIONS STATEMENT 0 Delineation 0 Reconnaissance evaluations o Perm:tt assistance and agency coordination Mitigation planning and mon:ttoring o Linear projects (roads, power ·and gas lines) 0 Environmental compliance during construction o Peer review and permit conditioning o Wetland inventories o o Professional report preparation o Impact analysis and sequencing Ph,r1c: ()UL') :328-7775 l'ax: ('_'.{J(,) "3?.8-7779 c,,JJ: 1::cJt,) 240-2'113 · .... ·J).';[O i sp. c0m STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS Wetl.and Permitting Services (WPS) is a firm that specializes in wetlands consulting and permitting assistance. The firm was established by Celeste Botha as CBWE in February 1992. lt has been awarded Women Business Enterprise (WBE) certification in Washington State. In addition to wetlands studies, WPS provides habitat and small streams consulting services. A description of WPS' s experience is outlined in the following sections. Wetlands Botha has been a full-time consultant since 1988, with major work emphasis on wetlands ecology, identification, inventory, delineation, assessments, mitigation and permitting. She has conducted well over 1,000 wetland delineations and assessments, primarily in Washington, but also in Oregon, California, Alaska and New York, and has written at least 300 technical reports describing investigation results. She is a US Army Corps of Engineers Certified Wetland Delineator. Ms. Botha co-taught the Wetland Identification and Delineation course for the Wetland Certification Program at the University of Washington for three years, from 1997 through 1999. Ms. Botha was Secretary of the Pacific Northwest Chapter of the Society of Wetland Scientists, the nation's largest chapter, for three years from 1994 through 1996. Ms. Botha was on the Board of Directors of the Society for Ecological Restoration Northwest from May 2004 through May 2006. Her knowledge of wetlands parameters is detailed below. Permitting Assistance Wetland Delineation Since 1988, assisted public and private clients to meet local, state and federal wetlands, streams, and shorelands requirements to develop properties. These have included SEPA Determinations of Non-Significance (DNS) and Environmental Impact Statements (EIS), NEPA (EIS), Section 404 general authorizations and individual permits and Section 401 Water Quality Certifications, Shorelines Management Act (SMA) permits, Hydraulic Permit Approvals (HPA), King County Scnsiti vc Areas Ordinance (SAO), Pierce and Snohomish County ordinance compliance, as well as numerous other state, county and city wetlands and stream ordinances. Delineated wetlands and prepared technical reports on hundreds of acres in Washington, Oregon, California, Alaska, and New York, including many disturbed, atypical and problem area evaluations. 2025 S. Norman Street Seattle, WA 98144 Vegetation Soils Hydrology Peer Review Environmental Inspections Functional Assessments Ecological Restoration Mitigation Monitoring Project Management GPS Training Bachelor of Science in Botany from University of Washington, 1974. Common and scientific names of over 300 plant species. Academic and practical soils training, at Oregon State University and while clllploycd with the USDA Soil Conservation Service. Hydric Soils ldcnli1ication training. Twelve years experience with hydric soils idcnti fication. Established and conducted several water-table fluctuation studies, including a 2-year study on 160 acres of sugar cane in the Everglades Agricultural Arca, Florida; a project monitoring 12 strategically-placed wells on sites in Renton, Kent and Auburn for IO months; and a site in Redmond with 8 wells for 3 months. Devised protocol for monitoring and evaluated 2 years of well data for a site in Auburn. Provided permit review assistance for compliance with sensitive area regulations to Pierce County Planning and Land Services and King County, Department of Development and Environmental Services; the City of Newcastle; the City of Sammamish; the City of Duvall; and the City of Federal Way, Washington. Provided environmental inspection services during construction of a $7.2 milliou transmission line upgrade in King County, to ensure compliance with all permit requirements including Best Management Practices and King County Surface Water Design Manual guidelines, particularly during construction in wetlands; inspected construction of roads projects for King County for compliance with clearing and grading permit conditions. Certified by USFWS in Habitat Evaluation Procedure (HEP) in Anchorage in 1991; trained by Bob Hruby (principal author) in the 2004 Washington Department of Ecology wetland rating system February 2005. Four years in the nursery and landscaping industry, Peace Corps volunteer teaching agriculture, soil conservationist, and currently wetlands consultant --these career elements have created a unique and synergistic perspective on ecological restoration. As a wetlands consultant, Ms. Botha has worked with landscape designers to develop detailed mitigation plans for several major and many smaller projects and has created several small mitigation plans in-house. Monitored projects for compliance with performance standards, including Clark Lake Buffer Enhancement project; numerous WSDOT projects, dozens of projects for Pierce County, Washington, Mohawk Plastics project, and Talbot-Berrydale Transmission Line. Project manager for wetlands component on more than 75 projects involving management and direction of associates, including most of those described in this qualifications statement. Fifteen years professional-level work directing support personnel. Certificated by Corvallis Microtechnology (CMT), May 2001. Retrained November 2004 and utilized GPS on Midland Wetland Inventory for Pierce County, WA. REPRESENTATIVE LOCAL PRO.TECTS REGULATORY PEER REVIEW Regulatory Review, Cities of Kent, Duvall, N cw castle, Covington and Sammamish, Washington. On-call peer review and permit assistance. Provided !he City of Newcastle with peer review and permit assistance as their on-call wetland specialist on all development proposals with wetlands and/or streams issues since incorporation in 1995 and the City of Duvall since 1997. Environmental Biologist, Pierce County, \Vashington. Acted as a staff biologist on a part-time, temporary basis for Pierce County Planning & Land Services, March through May 2000, September 2001 through January 2003, and July through September 2003. King County Senior Ecologist; King County Department of Development and Environmental Services; King County, Washington. As a Senior Ecologist on temporary contract from May 1994 through December 1995, responsible for wetlands regulatory review of Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) highway projects within the county, and King County Public Works Roads projects. Verification of wetland delineations and impacts assessments, participation in public hearings, coordination with WSDOT on permit review, assistance with streams permitting issues, review and significant input to mitigation proposals, and permit conditioning. King County Public Works projects included: Issaquah-Hobart Road at Tiger Mountain Road, 68th Street, 241st Ave SF, Juanita/Woodinville Road, 140th to 148th, Avondale Road Phase 2, 128th to 132nd Avenue NE, SE 208th Street, SE 240th Street, 272nd/277th Street. WSDOT projects included: SR 169; SR 18, 312th to 304th; SR 18, 304th to Hwy 516; SR 18, Hwy 516 lo Hwy 169; SR 18, Green River lo 312th; SR 18, Issaquah Hobart Road; SR 203 al 77th; SR 2 at Deception Pass; SR 900 at May Valley Road; SR 516 Mitigation; SR 405 at 160th; SR 520 at Avondale Road. WETLAND DELINEATION, MITIGATION PLANNING AND TECHNICAL REPORTING; VARIOUS CLIENTS, WASHINGTON STATE. Delineated wetlands, prepared mitigation plans and prepared technical reports on hundreds of acres in Washington, too nwnerous to list. Some examples are: Cedar River Corporate Park, Renton, Washington. Delineated wetlands and prepared conceptual mitigation plan on 12.57 acre site. Wetland Inventory; Midland area of Pierce County. Evaluated 372 parcels and delineated wetlands using GPS for inclusion on the County's GIS inventory. Entered data on each parcel into the County's permitting database. Whidbcy Naval Air Station, Department of Defense, Whidhey Island, Washington. Base- wide wetland delineations of complex, disturbed site. Ross Island Sand and Gravel, Klickitat County, Eastern Washington. Delineated and prepared technical report on an approximately 350-acre proposed gravel extraction site. Mohawk Plastics Wetlands Studies & Permitting Assistance; Auburn, Washington. Conducted detailed wetlands investigation on 7.5-acre site with relict hydric soils to delineate wetlands. Coordinated with the city of Auburn and the Corps of Engineers to obtain a Section 404 individual permit to fill 0.3 acres of jurisdictionally adjacent wetlands. Performed an impact and functional value analysis, and developed a mitigation plan lo compensate for wetlands impacts. Mitigation constructed in March 2002. Completed Years I, II and III monitoring and prepared monitoring reports. PUGET SOUND ENERGY (LINEAR) PROJECTS Snohomish 8-inch Gas Linc Upgrade, Snohomish County 2003 -2004: Delineated wetlands along 3-milc long, 150-foot wide corridor; coordinating with surveyors to map wetlands. Prepared report for permit submittal. Bothell to Sammamish Transmission Linc Upgrade, Snohomish and King Counties, numerous cities -ongoing: Delineated wetlands along a 13+mile long, JOO-fool wide power corridor; coordinating with surveyors to map wetlands. Assisted with permitting; provided environmental compliance services during construction. Talbot-Berrydale Transmission Line Upgrade, King County, Washington, 1996 -2003 EIS Wetlands Studi.es: Managed wetlands and wildlife studies along a 7.5 mile long, I 00-foot wide transmission line right-of-way. Delineation, classification, evaluation of all wetlands along the route, impact assessment of installation of new towers and lines, as well as removal of old poles and lines. Preparation of detailed wetlands report and EIS text. Supervised staff biologists and administered contractual issues. Coordinated with King County and Puget Power. Developed conceptual mitigation plan for project impacts. Monitored mitigation. Reports and Permitting Assistance: Developed final reports addressing vegetative screening for aesthetic impacts; loss of forested wetland habitat; temporary access wetland and stream impacts and mitigation from construction; and final wetland mitigation planning. Obtained King County grading permit, Corps Nationwide authorization, I IPA and 401 Certifications. Environmental Compliance: On-site inspections with oversight authority to enforce decisions related to environmental compliance throughout construction of the project involving installation of 56 huge steel monopole structures, 7 of which were placed within wetlands. Mitigation Monitoring: Monitored areas for natural regeneration and, in areas replanted as mitigation, monitored for compliance for 3 years. Wetland Delineation, Permit Assistance, Mitigation Planning; Smaller Projects, Puget Sound Energy, Washington. Delineated wetlands within Yakima River floodplain for Kittitas Natural Gas Pipeline, Pickering Transmission Line, Blake Island Cable Replacement, Marysville 8" High Pressure pipeline, Mount Si Substation, Sahalee 12" STW HP supply main, SR 525/Classic Road transmission line, White River Substation, Union Hill Substation. Delineated wetlands, prepared technical report, assisted with permit assistance and developed mitigation plans since 1992. PROJECTS OUTSIDE OF WASHINGTON STATE Wetlands Specialist, Wetlands Study, Yukon Gold Ice Pad (LGL Alaska Research Associates); Staines River Area, North Slope, Alaska. Conducted wetlands determination and qualitative assessment of tundra surrounding an oi I exploration and drilling ice platform, and wrote technical report describing findings. Wetland Delineation; Empire Pipeline, Upstate ~cw York (Woodward-Clyde Consultants). Delineated wetlands within 200-feet along the pipeline ROW. Wetlands Studies, Main Bay Fish Hatchery Expansion, Main Bay, Alaska. Performed wetland delineations and habitat characterizations, and prepared technical report for a proposed fish hatchery expansion. April 17, 2007 Cl'T'Y -)F RENTON .t@},'·' _ Planning/Building/Public Works Department 'Q -~· Denis Law, Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator fi','\i'fO;,'"'-----------~--------------------- February 25, 2008 Celesta Botha Wetland Permitting Services 2025 S. Norman Street Seattle, WA 98144 SUBJECT: Dear Celeste: Start of Wetland Maintenance and Monitoring Period Cedar River Corporate Park City of Renton File LUA 6-172 On February 22, 2008 I received the ( 'crt1 ficate of Installation for the Cedar River Corporate Park buffer restoration and enhancement project. Therefore, the date of this letter marks the beginning of your minimum 5-year maintenance and monitoring period, and the first report (per the approved momtoring plan) is due to the City by March 30. 2008. Please send two copies to my attention. As for releasmg surety device, my records indicate that there is only one surety device and it is to be held for the duration of the monitoring project. Surety devices cannot be released in partial amounts. Please let me know if you ha,·e any questions. Smccrcly, Li~t>,,·,l ~~r / ! I •\ ' I ·'-·-,_ ' ..__, ; ' Andrea Petzel, Planner \ Development Services Division CC" City of Renton File LUA 06-172 Charlie Foushee, Tarragon LLC 1055 South Grady Way-Renton. Washington 98057 @ Th1spape· co1:'::,r,·: ; -, , ·--,:yr,',_xi 'T18tenal. 20% pos'.consurner --~ R.ENTON \!Jlo \D (lJ· Tl!E Cl:RV:E. 0 r»::ane.;ition 0 Reoonnai.pance evalu,itions 0 Permit assi.8Unce and <1gency coordination 0 Professional report preparation 0 Impact analysis and lie<JUendng February 21, 2008 Andrea Petzel ~V]~ffe WETLAND PERMITTING SERVICES Phone: (Zo(,) .\1B-m1, Fax, (2o6) ~ Cdl: (200) 7..to-2..fl~ W(~isp.com City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: Cedar River Corporate Park project (LUA 06-172) Buffer restoration and enhancement installation report Dear Andrea: Mitigation planning and monitoring-0 Li.near project& (roads. pawer and gas linC8) 0 Environmental compliance during construction 0 Peer review and permit condltioni.ng 0 Wetland i.nvent:ories 0 ~NT~tlG oEVf!TY OF RENTC>N FEB 2 2 2008 RECEIVED I completed my inspection of the buffer restoration and enhancement installation for the Cedar River Corporate Park project (LUA 06-172) on February 13, 2008. Results of the inspection follow: 1. A pre-construction meeting occurred on December 13, 2007. 2. I inspected the plants on January 15, 2008, prior to installation; some plants were unsatisfactory and those were replaced with plants meeting specifications prior to January 28, when the next inspection occurred. 3. Silt fencing is satisfactorily installed. 4. Soil was amended per specifications. 5. Plants were installed correctly according to the typical installation detail as of February 13 (photographs are attached). 6. Mulch was installed as specified. 7. Blackberries were cleared in the south and the western portion of the eastern leg of Wetland B's undisturbed buffer only (minimal blackberry clearing occurred on the north end of the east side of this latter area), rather than throughout as was discussed in the Performance Standards section of the approved plan. 8. Conifers were planted within the same areas of buffer described above; some conifers were also planted within the northeastern corner of Wetland B's undisturbed buffer. 9. Permanent fencing was correctly installed. 10. Buffer signs were posted at regular intervals as specified on the mitigation plans. Signs are plastic rather than aluminum as specified. Monitoring of the buffer restoration areas will occur per the schedule in the approved plan. An as-built drawing of the monitoring plots will be prepared and submitted to the city, if requested, during the spring 2008 monitoring event. As indicated in the approved plan, no monitoring of the conifer plantings within the undisturbed buffer, e.g. the buffer enhancement areas, will be performed. Please notify me as soon as possible whether or not you approve of the installation as described above. If so, I request that the installation portion of the Performance Surety be refunded to the applicant, Tarragon LLC. Thank you for the opportunity to provide you with this information. Please do not hesitate to call with questions or concerns. cc: Charlie Foushee, Tarragon LLC Zu-25 South Nonm1n SU,eet 7'><,.ittle, Washington~_.,_~-· • • • loOKING EAST TOWARDS THE EASTERN END OF THE WETlAND 8 BUFFER ENHANCEMENT AREA TO THE POINT WHERE THE WETLAND "DOG-LEGS" TO THE NORTH. LOOKING NORTH FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE WETIAND 8 BUFFER ENHANCEMENT AREA. WEST END OF THE WETLAND B BUFFER ENHANCEMENT AREA. CONIFERS PLANTED IN THE UNDISTURBED BUFFER AREA WERE FLAGGED WITH RED AND PINK FLAGGING AS CAN BE SEEN IN THIS PHOTOGRAPH. FURTHER EAST ALONG WEST END OF WETLAND B BUFFER ENHANCEMENT AREA. CONIFERS PlANTED IN THE UNDISTURBED BUFFER AREA CAN ALSO BE SEEN IN THIS PHOTOGRAPH. STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING ) AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Jody L. Barton, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the Renton Reporter a bi-weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter refen-ed to, published in the English language continuously as a bi-weekly newspaper in King County, Washington. The Renton Reporter has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) \Vhich was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below statL'<l period. The annc.\.cd notice. a: Public Notice was published on February 3, 2007. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum ofSJ47.00. -·5 ~- ~n ~ Legal Advert1smg Representative, Renton Reporter Subscribed and sworn to me this 5<h day of February, 2007. t -?:, D (Zv1:a rvJ J B D Cantelon7 ,:<-' .• ~,~1111111,,,/ , ,,,,, D C 'It, ~ --·-\ ~ On ·,;, ., ... , ••••···~F/...,~ .•:-om."f';/s~/·,t::;..,, :.:--.... \J ·o .. (.' ~ I "'.-.:·,, ·j ~::; ~-> - Notary Public for the State of Washington, Residing in Kent, Washington P. 0. Number: NOTWE OF ENvlRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIHUNMENTAL HEV!EW COMMITTEE & PUBLIC HEARING RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee has i:">sued a Determination of Non-Significarn:,~- 1\:litigatcd for the following project under tbe authority of the Renton Munil·ipa\ ('DdP. · Culi1r Hiwr Bu.c:in0:=.2 Park LLAOfi-17:2. SA-H, EC~' I.o\'alion: Ea~t of I.ind Av1,n11(' S\\' & South of SW Ullh Stn,d TL(' applicant l>< reqm·,.,tm;: J k;u-iug Exc:mi,wr Sill' P!ar. upJmlY:d and Environnrnntal ReviHw for the con1'trnction of four otlicc/rctai l/ light industrial buildings totaling l~~.:·rn7 square foet in mr.a on a 539,272 square foot (l~.4 acre) site located \,:ithin the Lie:ht Tndu:;trial {[Ll zoning dr ... .;;ignati;;-n and within the, Employment Arca -Valky overlay. Parking would be provided within 108 propORf't! parking stalls located around thP-perimeter of the buildings within a surface parking lot. Accc;,s to the project site would be provided via two commercial driveway entrances off of Lind -, l /. Avenue S\V. A Category 2 wetland is lo rated a long the northern property line and a Category :~ wetland is located ulong the southf'm and eantt,n1 property liilPR. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or bt;~fore n:OO PM on February 19, 2007. AppPals must be filed in writing togethP.r with thf' rP.quired S7Fi.OO ,1p.p]i(',!.ti11n foe witb· Hiiaring V:xaminvr, City of lkuton, l(J;-)G South Cr;ul_v \\\iv l{e11tun. \VA 980.):) ;\pp(·:1'..~ to \h(' K,,unirn,r .ue g()\·enwd liy Citv of l{i•nton I\lunicip:tl Cod(c ~edi(in ·l-i"\-110.H Additional infbtmat.ion regarding the appeal prnce~s may l*' obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430- 6-510. A Public Hearing will be held by t.he Renton Hearing Examiner in tht> Council Chambi~rs, City Hall, on Mareh 6, 2007 at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Plan. If the Environmental Determination is appeal('{)., the appC'al will be heard a:, part of this public hearing. lntere,:,tcd partiP~ arc invitt ... I to attend the public hcarinf{. Published in the Renlun Reporter Fehrnary 3, 2007. #8f-i2821 Cedar River Corporate Park Conditions of Development (Summary) LWAIF~ Project Condition Source of When Compliance Party Responsible Notes Condition is Required The applicant shall ERC During Construction ApplicanUContracto comply with the r/Builder recommendations found in the geotechnical report prepared by Terra Associates, Inc, dated December 7, 2006. The applicant shall be ERC Construction Permit Applicant required to provide a Review Tern porary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements outlined in Volume 11 of the 2005 Stormwater Management Manual and provide staff with a Construction Mitigation Plan prior to issuance of Construction Permits. This condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division. The detention system for ERC Construction Permit Applicant/Engineer this project shall be Review required to comply with the requirements found in the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual to meet both detention (Conservation Flow control -a.k.a. Level 2) and water quality improvements. The applicant shall pay a ERC Prior to Building ApplicanUBuilder Estimated at Traffic Mitigation Fee in Permit Issuance $74,925 the amount of $75 for each new net daily trip prior to the issuance of a building permit. It is anticipated that the proposed project would result in the payment of $74,925.00 (999 net new daily trips x $75 = $74,925.00). Cedar River Corpon,ce Park Conditions of Development (1'.ummary) LUA06-172 Staff recommends that ERC Prior to Issuance of Applicant/Builder Estimated at the applicant pay a Fire Building Permit $74,519.64 Mitigation Fee based on $0.52 per square foot of new commercial building area prior to the issuance of a building permit. The fee is estimated at $74,519.64 ($0.52 X 143,307 square feet= $74,519 64). A revised site and Hearing Building Permit Applicant landscape plan shall be Examiner Review submitted with the building permit application showing the required 15- foot landscape strip along the site's SW 21st Street frontage, north of Building D for review and approval by the Development Services Division project manager. 1. Either the site plan shall Hearing Building Permit Applicant be revised to provide the Examiner Review required refuse and recyclable deposit areas per City standards, or a modification request to reduce the required refuse and recyclable deposit areas shall be submitted. The revised site plan or modification request shall be submitted to the Development Services Division project manager for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. CITY OF RENTON EXEMPTION FROM CRITICAL AREAS REGULATIONS DATE: LAND USE FILE NO.: PROJECT NAME: OWNER/APPLICANT: PROJECT MANAGER: PROJECT LOCATION: PROPOSAL: CRITICAL AREA: May 25, 2007 LUA-06-172, SA-H, ECF, CAR Cedar River Corporate Park Jill K. Ding, Senior Planner 2000 Block of Lind Avenue SW (parcel 334040-0285) Removal of three trees within the wetland buffer area that have been deemed hazardous by a registered landscape architect. Once removed, the trees would remain in the wetland buffer area as habitat. Category 3 wetland buffer EXEMPTION JUSTIFICATION: Pursuant to RMC section 4-3-050.C.5.c.ii of the Critical Areas Regulations is hereby granted for the following reason(s): X Dead or Diseased Trees: Removal of dead, terminally diseased, damaged, or dangerous ground cover or hazard trees which has been certified as such by a forester, registered landscape architect, or certified arborist, selection of which to be approved by the City based on the type of information required, or the City prior to their removal. DECISION: The proposed development is consistent with the following findings pursuant to RMC section 4-3-050. C.4.d: 1. The activity is not prohibited by this or any other chapter of the RMC or state or federal law or regulation; 2. The activity will be conducted using best management practices as specified by industry standards or applicable Federal agencies or scientific principles; and, 3. Impacts are minimized and, where applicable, disturbed areas are immediately restored, unless the exemption is a wetland below the size thresholds pursuant to RMC 4-3- 050.C.5.f i. H:\Division.s\Develop.ser\Dev&plan.ing\PROJECTS\06-172. Jill\Exem pt ion from Critical Areas.doc Page 1 of 2 , .... ... - I CITY OF RENTON EXEMPTION FROM CRITICAL AREAS REGULATIONS DATE: LAND USE FILE NO.: PROJECT NAME: OWNERJAPPLICANT: PROJECT MANAGER: PROJECT LOCATION: PROPOSAL: CRITICAL AREA: EXEMPTION JUSTIFICATION: May 25, 2007 LUA-06-172, SA-H, ECF, CAR Cedar River Corporate Park Tarragon -Cedar River Corporate Park LLC Jill K. Ding, Senior Planner 2000 Block of Lind Avenue SW (parcel 334040-0285) Removal of three trees within the wetland buffer area that have been deemed hazardous by a registered landscape architect. Once removed, the trees would remain in the wetland buffer area as habitat. Category 3 wetland buffer Pursuant to RMC section 4-3-050.C.5.c.ii of the Critical Areas Regulations is hereby granted for the following reason(s): ~--~--------------------------------- X Dead or Diseased Trees: Removal of dead, terminally diseased, damaged, or dangerous ground cover or hazard trees which has been certified as such by a forester, registered landscape architect, or certified arborist, selection of which to be approved by the City based on the type of information required, or the City prior to their removal. DECISION: The proposed development is consistent with the following findings pursuant to RMC section 4-3-050.C.4.d: 1. The activity is not prohibited by this or any other chapter of the RMC or state or federal law or regulation; 2. The activity will be conducted using best management practices as specified by industry standards or applicable Federal agencies or scientific principles; and, 3. Impacts are minimized and, where applicable, disturbed areas are immediately restored, unless the exemption is a wetland below the size thresholds pursuant to RMC 4-3- 050.C.5.f i. H :\Division .s\Oevelop.ser\Dev&plan .i ng\PROJECTS\06~ 172.Jill\Exemptlon from Critical Areas.doc Page 1 of 2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The trees removed shall be retained in the wetland and/or buffer area where feasible.2. SIGNATURES: date EXPIRATION: Five (5) years from the date of approval (signature date). H:\Division .s\Develop.ser\Dev&plan. ing\PROJECTS\06-172. J ill\Exemption from Critical Areas.doc Page 2 of 2 May 23, 2007 Ms. Jill K. Ding City of Renton 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Project: Subject: Cedar River Corporate Park, Our File No. 206200.40 Hazardous Tree Removal in Wetland Buffer Areas Dear Ms. Ding: m After reviewing the three trees located in the wetland buffer area of the Cedar River Corporate Park site, which are illustrated in the attached photographs, it is my opinion that these tree& pose a potential hazardous condition. It would be prudent to have these cut down as soon as possible. I suggest, once removed, that they remain in the critical wetland buffer area to serve as habitat. If you have any questions, please call me at (253) 383-2422. Sincerely, I ~<z»vtl ~ Henry S. Boyar, RLA Project Manager KC/sea Enclosures c: Murphy McCullough, Tarragon L:\Yr...:.2006\206200 Lind Avenue\correspondance\CedarRiverTreeRemoval-wp.doc 200 70523 _ Ltr _ TreeRemoval_206200.doc Cw1J Engineers StructurcJ! Engineers Landscape Archi'tects Community Planners Land Surveyors Neighbors TACOMA 2215 North 30th Street Suite 300 Tacoma, WA g8403·3350 253.383.2422 m 253.383.2572 FAX www.ahbl.com / Image o ne: Tree 'A' Tree c T~e B ~ 1 ,, " . l I". :-•' ' " wo: Trees 'B' Image T and 'C' mmm11 'I ' •1, t•: ~ :I l .. , '! ! W :1.l. !111hral111i s (f) -----·---~ -~·:-···>f-. :· · .. ·/ ~-,~+i-_-,1·---:-c. -~--. ' i!~ I ,I "' ., ' • I ! "' "' '3/\ V GNll ~ 1 s .!! ' i I ;a ' i I j ! "' "' i I I • I i; j T"". ]i 0 al j, ; Cl z z C zZ ~~ LU > !zlf! -w WU. (.) :::eo g;~ w ..J-a: wo > )!:I City of Renton LAND USE PERM IT 0 E'!~:1:rr/r1r ~··;;;;::·n,·;s MAY .? ( ··":7 MASTER APPLICATION Di,•~:.:;{,;;, PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME: ADDRESS: CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER: APPLICANT (if other than owner) River Ce>rp. COMPANY (rf applicable): ADDRESS: )ODD S CITY: s TELEPHONE NUMBER ZIP: 'ZoiR "2-"3 3 -I,;, 00 CONTACT PERSON NAME· IWI COMPANY (if applrcable) -Al:t.BI- ADDRESS· 3zoo 1-2...15 nor+h 3D'1'h Bt. of-e3b r --·~ CITY ZIP: --r o..cv ma , . WR :1&:ro ~ I IEL' EPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL AD' DRESS l('i-~ 353-ZB...2' 2-~.ica.,cle...hi~@kl V CD.IYJ PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Cedar f<..iver Cb!' t"a..rtc.[ Lind -Rue: PROJECTIADDRESS(S)ILOCATION AND ZIP CODE: ,Z.000 13/oc.JC__ STf Livid. Ave 'SLLJ Re¥Jton 1 (.A.J):I q505 r KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): EXISTING LAND USE(S): PROPOSED LAND USE(S): 142 EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: e.. PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): EXISTING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING (ii applicable) SITE AREA (in square feel): G '3 s . ..P SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED: SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable): NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (ii applicable): NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (rl applicable): PROJECT INFORMATION (continued) ·-~ NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (1f appl,cablo)-PROJECT VALUE: -e SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (1f applicable): n/o.. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (ii applicable): BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (d applicat>le): ..-, /c,.__ D AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): 142.,4;34 sf SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL D AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO Q FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. N. BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (ii applicable): -e-D GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. N. NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (ii D HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. tt. applicable): D SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq. N. NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (ii applicable): 0 WETLANDS sq. N. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THE SW QUARTER OF SECTION fl, TOWNSHIP '2-3, RANGE 5 , IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. , TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. SE:f'A 3. 2. 4. Staff will calculale applicable fees and postage: $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I. (Ptint Name/s) , declare that I am (please check one} _ the current owne, of the property involved in this application or __ the authorized represenlatiYe to act for a corporation (~ease attach proof ol authorizalion) and thal the foregoing statements and answers herein conlained and the information herewith are in all respects 1rue and correct lo the best of my know1edge and belief. ----------~---- (Signature ot Owner/Repfesenta1ive) (Signalure o1 Owner/Represenlalive} J certify that I know or have sati.sfaclory evKlence that---------~- siyned this instrumenl and acknowledged it to be his/her/1heir free and voluntary act for the uses o.nd purposes mentioned in the instrument. Not;uy Public in and for the S1a1e or Washington Nolary (Print) ____ ~---- My1 "1pr,oin'.rnenl expires:~--------~--~---~ I DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS Master Application Form• IRIB~-LI£illtj~11Eim1mafilf.i1fitllil Neighborhood Detail Map 4 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section PROJECT NAME: (.edo.r °R,'\J(I<"" ~ ~,<__ DATE: 5(ol.?-:}Ci] 4. Development Planning Section Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\Forms\Planning\waiverofsubmittalreqs_9-06.xls I DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS Wireless: Applicant Agreement Statement 2 AND 3 Inventory of Existing Sites 2 AND a Lease Agreement, Draft 2 AND a Map of Existing Site Conditions 2AND3 Map of View Area 2 AND a Photosimulations 2 ANDa This requirement may be waive'd by: 1 . Property Services Section 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section PROJECT NAME: Cedv.c ]?l\J<?..C O::rp-'"B-.Jc DATE: cgajo7 4, Development Planning Section Q:\WEB\PW1DEVSERV\Forms\Planning\waiverofsubmittalreqs_9-06.xls 09/06 ' May 23, 2007 Ms. Jill K. Ding City of Renton 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Project: Subject: Cedar River Corporate Park, Our File No. 206200.40 Hazardous Tree Removal in Wetland Buffer Areas Dear Ms. Ding: m After reviewing the three trees located in the wetland buffer area of the Cedar River Corporate Park site, which are illustrated in the attached photographs, it is my opinion that these trees pose a potential hazardous condition. It would be prudent to have these cut down as soon as possible. I suggest, once removed, that they remain in the critical wetland buffer area to serve as habitat. If you have any questions, please call me at (253) 383-2422. Sincerely, -i\"'~"1 ~" & Henry S. Boyar, RLA Project Manager KC/sea Enclosures c: Murphy McCullough, Tarragon L:\Yr_2006\206200 Lind Avenue\correspondance\CedarRiverTrceRemoval-wp.doc 20070523 _Ur_ TreeRemoval_2D6200. doc Ccrn,nunily PlannP.1.s Lane! Stirveyors 1',lergt-,bors TACO il A 2215 North 30th Street Suite 300 Tacoma. WA 98403-3350 253.383.2422 TL 253.383.2572 F/.< www.ahbl.com , T ree A Tree C Tree B .. ! mmmm 1- (f) s (f) ' ' I I I '3A 'r/ ONll l !. 0 ID ('J :.::: Lu 0 T ,, '· ~y c..~':"~' + >+-+ Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department ~ ~ K: Kathy Keolker, Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator "'~;"1'1'0,.;-----------.~,-~~--------------- ~F RENTON April 26, 2007 Jim Carleton AHBL, Inc. 2215 N 30th Street, Suite 300 Tacoma, WA 98403 RE: Cedar River Corporate Park Final Wetland Mitigation Plan File No. LUA06-172 Dear Mr. Carleton: I have completed my review of the revised final Wetland Buffer Mitigation Plan prepared by Wetland Permitting Services, dated April 16, 2007 and the planting plan prepared by AHBL dated April 16, 2007. The submitted plan addresses all of my previous comments and is approved. In addition, a bond quantity worksheet was submitted for the installation of the proposed mitigation and was approved. A cash surety in the amount of $92,993.72 was posted on April 25, 2007. Monitoring and Maintenance Period Start Date: Once the mitigation project has been installed, please provide me with the wetland consultant's written confim1ation of installation pursuant to the final apprnvcd mitigation plan as well as an as-built report. The date the City receives this written confirmation will constitute the beginning of the minimum 5-year maintenance and monitoring period. z"d Step -Maintenance/Monitoring Surety: Once the mitigation is successfully installed and verified by the project biologist, the City will request a maintenance and monitoring surety device from the applicant. We will release the performance surety once we have the maintenance and monitoring surety. To further clarify: • Contract Requirements for 2"d Surety: RMC 4-3-05002 requires that, "for wetland and/or stream/lake mitigation plans, the [maintenance and monitoring] surety device shall be sufficient to guarantee that structures, improvements, and mitigation required by pem1it conditions perform satisfactorily for a minimum of five (5) years after they have been completed." In order to approve your draft maintenance and monitoring contract(s), we will need to see language in the draft --------------·--------1-0-55-So_u_th_Grady Way-Renton. Washington 9-80_5_7 ________ R E N 1' 0 N {;+:'), Tnis oaoer r.c, >ni"r,;,i .',0'',\.nns:t,-rm'Ciirr,Pr c', h · . ., a.l c r T!'1. ·.·~·riv;. / Cedar River Corporate Par.. nal Wetland Mitigation Plan File No. LUA07-172 Page 2 of2 contract(s) clearly stating that the cost of plant maintenance and replacement of all failed mitigation plantings is included [ e.g. add provisions for plant and sign replacement and weed removal referencing compliance with the survival rates noted in the final wetland mitigation plan.] Please obtain a draft contract for only the maintenance of the mitigation areas that is separate from your contract for the installation of the mitigation. • City Review of Contract Required: Once the City approves a draft maintenance and monitoring contract, this must be followed up with a final contract signed by all parties ( e.g. property owner and the biologist/landscaping company). Once you have a final, signed, City-approved maintenance and monitoring contract for this work, we will let you know the total surety amount (125 percent of the contract per administrative determination). If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7219. Sincerely, 7w:P7} Jill K. Ding Senior Planner Enclosures cc: Taragon, Inc. Howard Seelig File April 18, 2007 Ms. Jill Ding City of Renton Renton City Hall -6th Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055-3232 Project: Subject: Cedar River Corporate Park, Our File No. 206072.30 Wetland Buffer Mitigation Plan Comment/Response Dear Ms. Ding: m The Wetland Buffer Mitigation Plan has been revised per your comments. The items that specifically pertain to the plan drawings items have been amended as follows: Comment 2: Please revise #10 to specify that the temporary drip irrigation system to be installed shall be capable of delivering at least 1 inch of water per week to the plants. Response: The revised irrigation note is located on Sheet W3.1 under "General Landscape Notes", Number 8. This has been revised in the report as well. Comment 9: Page W2.1 of the mitigation plan should be revised to show the split rail fence encompassing the wetland buffer/storm drainage facilities on the north and east sides of the property. Response: On Sheet W2.l, a second split rail fence line has been included on the drawing. The new fence line encompasses the outside perimeters of the rain garden and bioswales that directly abut any wetland buffers. The two-fence line distinction was made in conjunction with your conversation with the Wetland Biologist, Celeste Botha, on April 17, 2007. In this conversation, a distinction was made between the split rail fence pertaining to the Construction Bond, which is the new fence line noted second in the legend, and the other which pertains to the Sensitive Areas Bond. To satisfy your comment, the new line is shown graphically on Sheet W2.1, though this line will also be shown in the engineering documents. If you have any questions, please call me at (253) 383-2422. Kelly Carson Landscape Designer KC/sea L: \Yr _2006\206200 Lind Avenuc\correspondance\206200 _ Wterland M 1Uetler-wp.doc 20070418_Ltr_CommentRespWetlond __ 2D6200.doc C.".11/ Cngrnccrc, Con,•m,:n:tv Pi.-i11ncrs ThCO,'vlA 2215 North 30th Street Suite 300 Tacoma, WA 98403-3350 253.383.2422 Tl. 253.383.2572 f,\;,, www.ahbl.com CITY )F RENTON Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator April 3, 2007 Jim Carleton AHBL, Inc. 22 I 5 N 30th Street, Suite 300 Tacoma, WA 98403 RE: Cedar River Corporate Park Final Wetland Mitigation Plan File No. LUA06•172 Dear Mr. Carleton: I have completed an initial review of the Wetland Buffer Mitigation Plan prepared by Wetland Permitting Services, dated March 22, 2007 in accordance with the City's critical areas regulations outlined in RMC 4-3-050 and the City's submittal requirements as outlined in RMC 4-8-I20D. Please revise the submitted mitigation report and plan as follows: I. Under the "Construction Plan" section of the report please revise #9 to specify 3-4 inches of wood chips would be applied to the site. 2. Please revise #10 to specify that the temporary drip irrigation system to be installed shall be capable of delivering at least I inch of water per week to the plants. 3. Please revise # 12 to include the language "Alteration or disturbance is prohibited by Law" to the sign as required by RMC 4-3-050F. 4. Under the "Species Diversity" section please specify that of the 4 tree species that are expected to become established that at least one of those species should be a coniterous species. 5. Under the "Monitoring" section please note that the photo points will be marked with stakes and that the sample plots will also be marked with stakes. 6. Under the "Maintenance Plan" section please specify that fertilizer shall be applied after the first year of planting and each year thereafter in the fall. 7. Under the "Mitigation Surety" section please note that two different surety devices will be required. The first is for the installation in the amount of 150 percent of the contracted cost of installation. The second is for the maintenance and monitoring surety in the amount of 125 percent of the contracted cost of maintenance and monitoring. -------------~ I 055 South Grady Way -Renlon, Washington 98057 tii2\ Thj~ r,<,n.,, rr,r,tC,ln<> ",r,Ci, mr•,,rlc,cl ..,.-,.,,t.,..;,.1 Clr,Ol. ,...,,.,, rnnr, ,~,,_, AHEAD OF THE CURVE Cedar River Corporate P, File No. LUA07-l 72 Page 2 of 3 'nal Wetland Mitigation Plan 8. Once the mitigation plantings have been installed an as-built report will be required to ensure the mitigation was properly installed and to track changes or substitutions that may have occurred. 9. Page W2.1 of the mitigation plan should be revised to show the split rail fence encompassing the wetland buffer/storm drainage facilities on the north and east sides of the property. Surety Device Process: We will need two separate surety devices (one for the installation of the mitigation and the second for the maintenance and monitoring) and we do not provide partial releases of either. Pursuant to RMC 4-1-230C, acceptable surety devices are: 1. Cash; or 2. Letter of credit (sample enclosed); or 3. Set aside letter; provided, that the funds cannot be withdrawn, spent, or committed to any third party (sample enclosed); or 4. Savings account assigned to the City and blocked as to withdrawal by the secured party without the City's approval. 1 '' Step -Performance surety: Once the mitigation plan and report are revised and approved by the City, wt; will request a signed bid proposal for the installation of plantings and any other mitigation measures and a,$ecurity device ensuring installation of the plantings. Pursuant,to RMC 4-3-0SOM 17, the amount of the required performance security is 150 percent of the cost of installation; • Monitoring and Maintenance Period S.t{JI?t Date: Once the mitigation project has been installed, please provide me with the wetland consultant's written confirmation of installation pursuant to the final approved mitigation plan as well as an as-built report. The date the City receives this written confirmation will constitute the beginning of the minimum 5-year maintenance and monitoring period. 2°d Step -Maintenance/Monitoring Surety: Once the mitigation is successfully installed and verified by the project biologist, the City will request a maintenance and monitoring surety device from the applicant. We will release the performance surety once we have the maintenance and monitoring surety. To further clarify: • Contract Requirements for 2"ct Surety: RMC 4-3-050G2 requires that, "for wetland and/or stream/lake mitigation plans, the [maintenance and monitoring] surety device shall be sufficient to guarantee that structures, improvements, and mitigation required by permit conditions perform satisfactorily for a minimum of five (5) years after they have been completed." In order to approve your draft maintenance and monitoring contract( s ), we will need to see language in the draft contract(s) clearly stating that the cost of plant maintenance and replacement of all failed mitigation plantings is included [e.g. add provisions for plant and sign replacement and weed removal referencing compliance with the survival rates Cedar River Corporate P File No. LUA07-l 72 Page 3 of3 inal Wetland Mitigation Plan noted in the finai wetland mitigation plan.] Please obtain a draft contract for only the maintenance of the mitigation areas that is separate from your contract for the installation of the mitigation. • City Review of Contract Required: Once the City approves a draft maintenance and monitoring contract, this must be followed up with a final contract signed by all parties ( e.g. property owner and the biologist/landscaping company). Once you have a final, signed, Citycapproved maintenance and monitoring contract for this work, we will let you know the total surety amount (125 percent of the contract per administrative determination). Please submit two copies of your final plan and report to my attention for review and approval. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at{425) 430-7219. Sincerely, CpJ 1(, :12-~ ~ill~-Ding ~ Senior Planner (} Enclosures cc: Taragon, Inc. Howard Seelig -·. { On !:JNr /;x,,nL~ ltflc.-ht?ad) IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT Effective Date: Letter of Credit No. Expiration Date: TO: FROM: Finance Director Banker, Title City of Renton Institution 2ee Mill A-, eHtte Sottth /Of)'S 5. 0,rc,J.':J (V.<.r _:A:...:d::..:d::.re::::s=-s ------------- Renton, Washington 98055 City, State, Zip {:1:66) 235-2j58 4~-'-!-30-fit85(} Telephone: Dear City of Renton: We (the "Bank") hereby establish, at the request and for the account of ________ _ (the "Owner"), in your favor this Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit Number ______ , in the amount of (U.S. Dollars:$ }, to finance certain improvements in the Owner's property. The purpose of this letter is to insure that the improvements listed below are completed for the project known as ___________________ (the "Project"), Building Permit In the following space, describe the improvements required: number: -------- This letter of Credit shall be effective immediately and shall expire on: ---------- 1. Our close of business on the business day coincident with or immediately following; or 2. The date on which there shall be a drawing of the full face amount of this Letter of Credit; or 3. The date on which the Om1er shall have delivered to you a valid certificate of cancellation of the Letter of Credit and substitution of alternate letter of credit, in a form and drawn on a principal institution acceptable to the City, at which time you shall cancel this Letter of Credit and return it to us. We hereby irrevocably authorize you to draw on us by delivering to us in accordance with the terms and conditions hereof, your sight draft or drafts, with each such draft accompanied by your signed and dated statement detailing the reason for the draw-down, in an aggregate amount not exceeding the amount show above. More than one draft may be presented so long as the entire amount of such drafts presented in connection therewith does not exceed the amount available hereunder. Each draft and Certificate presented hereunder must be date the date of presentation to the Bank. Any draw-down presented prior to 10:00 a.m. which is in full compliance with the terms of this Letter of Credit will be honored by our payment to you of the draft amount by wire transfer of immediately available funds for the attention of the person specified by you in such draft, no later than I :00 p.m. on the business day coincident with the date of presentation of such draft. Any sight draft so presented after 10:00 a.m. on the business day next succeeding the date of presentation of such draft. Drawings may be made under this Letter of Credit in accordance with the terms hereof. More than one drawing may be made under this letter of Credit as described above. Any presentation under this Letter of Credit must be made as herein specified to the Letter of Credit office of the Bank. · This Letter of Credit is subject to the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits of the International Chamber of Commerce, Publication No. 500 (the "Uniform Customs') as in force on the date of issuance of this Letter of Credit. This Letter of Credit shall be deemed to be a contract made under the laws of the State of Washington and shall, as to matters not governed by the Uniform Customs, be governed by and construed in accordance with the Jaws of that State, including without limitation the Uniform Commercial Code of the State of Washington (the "UCC'l In the event of a conflici between the terms of this Letter of Credit and either of the Uniform Customs of the UCC, the · Letter of Credit shall control.· As between the Uniform Customs and the UCC, the Uniform Customs shall control. Anything to the contrary in Article 45 of the Uniform Customs notwithstanding, this Letter of Credit is intended to remain in full force and effect until it expires in accordance \\ith its terms. FOR RENTON: FOR Tiffi BANK: Signature: Signature: Printed Name: Printed Name: Title: Title: Telephone: Telephone: APPLICANT: Owner: Address: Phone: Fax: Attention: Title: (On Your Bank Letterhead) ASSIGNMENT OF FUNDS TO THE CITY OF RENTON BANK: Branch: Address: Phone: Fax: Attention: ------------- Title: The above referenced bank hereby certifies that _________________ _ dollars ($ is on deposit in the account number -------------~ under the name of the City of Renton, to secure the applicant's performance of the following work required in connection with the plat or project described below. Plat or Project: Location/ Address of Plat or Project: The required work is generally described as follows: The bank hereby certifies and agrees that these funds will not be released without written instructions from an authorized agent of the City of Renton (the City). We further agree that these funds will be paid to the City within 10 days of receiving written notice that the City has determined that the required work has not been properly performed. The bank shall have no duty or right to evaluate the correctness or appropriateness of any such notice or determination by the City and shall not interplead or in any manner delay payment of said funds to the City. The applicant hereby agrees to this assignment of funds and that its obligation to perform the required work is not limited to the amount of funds held by the bank. This Assignment of funds is irrevocable and cannot be cancelled by the bank or applicant. These funds may not be assigned, pledged, used as security or otherwise made available to the applicant, bank or a third party without the prior written consent of the City. Applicant Bank: Authorized Signature Authorized Signature Name, Title Name, Title Date Date ' . (on "<j:lwr h:ZrJk, leffer ~) SET ASIDE LETTER [Lender has on deposit in Construction Loan # _____________ the sum of S, ____________ _ -------------------to cover the construction of--------- Said funds will be disbursed only after ___ ,c[l""e.,n~d"'e~rJ.._ ____ _ has satisfied itself that the wqrk to be· paid for has actually been performed to the satisfaction of· the City of R~nton. These funds set aside shall not be disbursed to the b_orrower; .a . · contra.ctor working for the borrower, or any third party without the prior written approval of the City of Renton and this loan shall not be terminated or ·an funds thereunder distributed . . . . without the prior approval of -the City·of Renton. . . In the event --------'-"'"'wecnceee,rC.L _______________ fails to c.omplete and· pay ·for the improvements as,requ!~ed by the City of Renton all funds remaining in. said deposit shall be made available to the City of Renton to complete and pay for the cost of said improvements. Applicant Baak: Authorized Signature Authorized Signature Name, Title Name, Title Date · Date + ..ii + CIT~ :>F RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.K, Administrator ~~~' '? -<" Kathy Keolker, Mayor <o'1'\i''1'01r------------------------------ March 26, 2007 Jim Carleton AHBL, Inc. 2215 N 301h Street #300 Tacoma, WA 98403 Subject: Cedar River Corporate Park LUA06-172, SA-H, ECF Dear Mr. Carleton: Please find attached comments from our Police Department. You may find these comments helpful for the design and construction of your project. Please contact me at (425) 430-7219 if you have any questions. Sincerely, 1r:22- JillK. Ding ~ Senior Planner l/ cc: Howard Seelig I Owner Tarragon, LLC / Applicant -------10_5_5_S_ou-th_G_ra_dy_W_a_y_--R-en-to_n_, -\,-'a-,h-in-g-to_n_9_8_05_7 _______ -~ {;.,, This oaoer contains(.)()% recvcled material. 30% oostconsurner 1\HEAO OF THE CURVE • ,-lROJECT LUA06-172, SA-H, ECr Cedar River Corporate Park City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENTAL APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET (Continuation) POLICE RELATED COMMENTS 27 Police Calls for Service Estimated Annually CONSTRUCTION PHASE Theft from construction sites is one of the most commonly reported crimes in the City. To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site should have security lighting, and any construction trailer or storage area should be completely fenced-in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective criminal and will demonstrate that the area is private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked when not in use, and should be fitted with heavy-duty deadbolts with a minimum 1-1/2" throw when bolted. Glass windows in construction trailers should be shatter-resistant. Toolboxes and storage containers should be secured with heavy-duty padlocks and kept locked when not in use. "No Trespassing" signs should be posted on the property during the construction phase. These signs allow officers, upon contact, to provide a verbal warning to trespassers that should they be contacted on the property again, they could be cited and/or arrested. COMPLETED COMPLEX All exterior doors should be made of solid metal or metal over wood, with heavy-duty deadbolt locks, latch guards or pry-resistant cylinders around the locks, and peepholes. If glass doors are used, they should be fitted with the hardware described above and additionally be fitted with a layer of security film. Security film can increase the strength of the glass by up to 300%, greatly reducing the likelihood of breaking glass to gain entry. Access to the back of the buildings should be limited, preferably with security fencing, as these areas could be vulnerable to crime due to the lack of natural surveillance by passersby. It is recommended that the commercial areas be monitored with recorded security alarm systems. It's not uncommon for businesses to experience theft and/or vandalism during the hours of darkness. An auxiliary security service could be used to patrol the property during those times. It is important to direct all foot traffic into the main entrance of the buildings. Any alternative employee entrances should have coded access to prevent trespassing. Page 1 of 2 • If there are payphones ou , the businesses, it is recommenc they be outgoing use only. Public payphones tend to attract drug traffic and having on1y the ability to call out on payphones severely hinders this type of activity. All areas of this project need to have adequate lighting. This will assist in the deterrent of theft from motor vehicle (one of the most common crimes in Renton) as well as provide safe pedestrian travel for customers utilizing the businesses. The structures should have building numbers clearly posted with numbers at least 6" in height and of a color contrasting with the building. This will assist emergency personnel in locating the correct location for response. Landscaping should be installed with the objective of allowing visibility -not too dense and not too high. Too much landscaping will make customers and employees feel isolated and will provide criminals with concealment to commit crimes such as burglary and malicious mischief (property destruction). It is key for a complex of this size to have appropriate lighting and signage. "No Trespassing" signs should be posted in conspicuous locations throughout the property, including entrances to the property and parking areas. I highly recommend that the developer have a Renton Police Crime Prevention Representative conduct a security survey of the premises once construction is complete. Page 2 of 2 Cit) 'enton Department of Planning I Building If Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: APPLICATION NO: LUA06-172, SA-H, ECF APPLICANT: Tarraoon, LLC PROJECT TITLE: Cedar River Coroorate Park SITE AREA: 539,272 square feet LOCATION: E of Lind Ave SW & S of SW 19th St COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 19, 2007 DATE CIRCULATED: J PROJECT MANAGER:· Jill Dina '-PLAN REVIEW: Jan 1111an BUILDING AREA lnrossl: 143,307 souare feet I WORK ORDER NO: 77706 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval and Environmental Review for the construction of four office/retail/light industrial buildings totalling 143,307 square feet in area on a 539,272 square foot (12.4 acre) site located within the Light Industrial (IL) zoning designation and within the Employment Area -Valley overlay. Parking would be provided within a surface parking lot around the perimeter of the site. Access to the project site would be provided via two commercial driveway entrances off of Lind Avenue SW. A Category 2 wetland is located along the northern property line and a Category 3 wetland is located along the southern and eastern property lines. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code} COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable Mon, Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Jmpacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earlh Housina Air Aesthetics Water Liaht!Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transnortation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet ' ,1 i--h c.1· "d L ~··· L IU' B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this applicahon with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional inf tion is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director o Date CITY OF RENTON ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) Pursuant to WAC 197-11-600 (4) (c) and WAC 197-11-625 Addendum to Cedar River Corporate Park Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated (DNS-M) (LUA06-172 ECF, SA-H) Date of Addendum: March 19, 2007 Date of Original Issuance of SEPA Threshold Determination: January 29, 2007 Proponent: Application File: Tarragon, LLC LUA06-172, ECF, SA-H Project Name: Cedar River Corporate Park Proposal/ Purpose of Addendum: The applicant is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval and Environmental Review for the construction of four office/retail/light industrial buildings totaling 143,307 square feet in area on a 539,272 square foot (12.4 acre) site located within the Light Industrial (IL) zoning designation and within the Employment Area -Valley overlay. Parking would be provided within a surface parking lot around the perimeter of the site. Access to the project site would be provided via two commercial driveway entrances off of Lind Avenue SW. A Category 2 wetland is located along the northern property line and a Category 3 wetland is located along the southern and eastern property lines. After the original SEPA threshold Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated (DNS-M) was issued, the applicant determined that additional fill would be placed on the project site as surcharge. In the original geotechnical report submitted with the project application, it was disclosed that three feet of fill would be placed on the proposed building pads as a surcharge. An addendum to the original geotechnical report has been submitted amending the proposed volume of fill to raise the elevation of the site four to five feet. The addendum states that the previous recommendations discussed in the original geotechnical report are not amended. It has been determined that the environmental impacts of the new proposal are adequately addressed under the analysis of significant impacts contained within the previously adopted DNS-M. Based on WAC 197-11-600(4) c, the addendum process may be used if analysis or information is added that does not substantially change the analysis of significant impacts and alternatives in the existing environmental document. Therefore, the SEPA addendum process has been utilized for the necessary Environmental Review of the proposed development. Location: 20XX Lind Avenue SW; KCA No. 334040-0285 Lead Agency: City of Renton, Planning/Building/Public Works Department Review Process: Individual development proposals for the Cedar River Corporate Park will be reviewed under SEPA Rules and City of Renton policies and regulations applicable to the development. Additional Information: If you would like additional information, please contact Jennifer Henning, Principal Planner, City of Renton, Development Services Division, Planning/Building/Public Works Department at (425) 430-7286. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE SIGNATURES: ' an, A ministrator lanning/Building/Public Works Terry Higashiyama, Administrator Community Services Department DATE DATE B/20/07 ~-C-h_i_e_f _______________ ___,,""-'-....... =+'o-"A-T,_E_ Renton Fire Department lex ietsch, :11.dministr EDNSP 1.o c1-- DTE AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING ST A TE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. County of King ) Nancy Thompson being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 15th day of March 2007, affiant deposited via the United States Mail a sealed envelope(s) containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Signature: SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this lif" day of i\j U/vch , 2007. -~.-=--- -yiuc/\lh~ Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Residing at R..uv,, @ , therein. Cedar River Corporate Park LUA 06-172, SA-H, ECF The Decision or Recommendation contains a complete list of the Parties of Record. • • ... HEARING EXAMINER'S REPORT ;:wrst IM ./,,= U) (1) > <i: "' a:> e 0 ..c I'--< IM <'I ----,...., l<I ey. =:. z IM .., t. <'I E"' ~ ~ ' U) <'I 0 Q) IM > <i: F3 · 18 T23N RSE W 1/2 I CA IM IM IM CA w a:> CJ <I) ,:: Q) U) CA IM IM IM CA : ... --,--·< IM IM IM IM .--~s_w~_16_th~ _s_t. ____ · ~ -: 1 0:: ! ·······;: I CD ·C8 <I) --ro . ···-::,.. SW 19th St. l:£l \-i co CD > ' SW CD 21st \@ R-1 St. \ CD R-1 IH ~ H3 · 30 T23N R5E W 1/2 , / \ er/- I "' e ZONING P/8/PW Tl!CHNICAL 81!llVICB8 0211611l6 ----Rent.on Cit.:, Umrt,r O zyo 'Oo G3 19 T23N R5E W 1/2 5319 t··· •11 f, j ~ :! f .ii •• I f I 111 H,1, 1i11ha:1m ~ ·= :o. ic~ ;; f ~· r~i s (f) ~-. -. --4- • • ~I.!::;: .. .. .. .. J •• ~ .... .ii i ! ~~' ~! .t ~ ~~~ ·"'"i!'jt • s :n: -it ir' r·! :;o l l /! r: /=, f(-Ji ; ,, ) I I .! l <) • _______ ... ____ _ l· ~ Ji 0 Ill i~ i I I I /.i, ' rt I: II ' i ;' ' . I' ' i I 1· ;j !, " ,, le " " • · 1--- t- ,--) r ----l L f -----l I ~ -•.. •• i! :! ~ ' ,~ li ,I !1 Ii 'C... I 11 l --... "' ... ,, ~n t -~ --- f---,_ ~ f--- ~ ~ -~ - ,_ ~ 0 I=" f--- i:. I --' -! ~ ' I: ! I I ! L f::, L L f-- 0 le f--l f-- ' L L l ... I ~ L i L f-- 1-. f-- '::. I g -l ---cl' - -{] --- ----- C: -- - i:: LL , __ f-- L n le f-- f--,_ L le L i:.. f--- f--- z 0 ' 1-- 1 ) -Ill -J -0 -Ill -,_ L 1--1 L II) L -1 -[,__.~ Ill i 1 1 I il Z r "" ,! l 0 . .. . ,, ~ l ·1!1 -. .. ! !. 1---I U. Ill L 2 L L L L 0 L L L L ~ L ea { ,' II) i - 1-- 1 ) Ill J Ill i~ !! t_ • .. L Ca ~ 0 ;i;- .•. 0 -~ .. ·- L ~ ··-· ··-. L - "'= - ' ~ - - .. 0 -h ·_ I, - 1-- 1 > Ill J Ill l 1--) ~- z ' CITY OF RENTC DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA06-172, SA-H, ECF APPLICANT: Tarragon, LLC PROJECT NAME: Cedar River Business Park DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval and Environmental Review for the construction of four office/retail/light industrial buildings totaling 143,307 square feet in area on a 539,272 square foot (12.4 acre) site located within the Light Industrial (IL) zoning designation and within the Employment Area -Valley overlay. Parking would be provided within 408 proposed parking stalls located around the perimeter of the buildings within a surface parking lot. Access to the project site would be provided via two commercial driveway entrances off of Lind Avenue SW. A Category 2 wetland is located along the northern property line and a Category 3 wetland is located along the southern and eastern property lines. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: MITIGATION MEASURES: East of Lind Avenue SW & South of SW 19th Street The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section 1. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations found in the geotechnical report prepared by Terra Associates, Inc, dated December 7, 2006. 2. The applicant shall be required to provide a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements outlined in Volume II of the 2005 Stormwater Management Manual and provide staff with a Construction Mitigation Plan prior to issuance of Construction Permits. This condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division. 3. The detention system for this project shall be required to comply with the requirements found in the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual to meet both detention (Conservation Flow control -a.k.a. Level 2) and water quality improvements. 4. The applicant shall pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee in the amount of $75 for each new net daily trip prior to the issuance of a building permit. It is anticipated that the proposed project would result in the payment of $74,925.00 (999 net new daily trips x $75 = $74,925.00). 5. Staff recommends that the applicant pay a Fire Mitigation Fee based on $0.52 per square foot of new commercial building area prior to the issuance of a building permit. The fee is estimated at $74,519.64 ($0.52 x 143,307 square feet= $74,519.64). ERC Mitigation Measures Page 1 of 1 Washington State Department of Transportation Douglas B. MacDonald Secretary of Transportation March 12, 2007 Jill Ding, Associate Planner City of Renton Planning 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Subject: SR 167 (Lind Ave SW/ SW 21" Street vicinity) Northwest Region 15700 Dayton Avenue North P.O. Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 206-440-4000 ITY: 1-800-833-6388 www.wsdot.wa.gov Cedar River Corporate Park (142 434 sf commercial/office) City of Renton (File #LUA06-l 72, SA-H, ECF) Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) Comments Dear Ms. Ding: We thank you for allowing the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) to comment through SEPA for the above referenced development The subject project proposes to construct four buildings with a total square footage of 142,434 sf to be comprised of about 60% warehousing use and 40% office use_ Per WSDOT TIA requirement, please provide the LOS calculations at all State Highway intersections impacted by IO or more Peak Hour trips generated by the development. To ensure that the subject project will not create any adverse impacts on the State facility, please provide the trip distribution and LOS analysis at the following intersections: a. The SW 41" St and E Valley Rd intersection, where it serves SR167 on and off- ramp SB traffic. b. SRl67 northbound on-ramp and off-ramp at S 43'd Street. If you have any questions, or require additional information, please contact Felix Palisoc of our Development Services section at 206-440-4713, or via e-mail at palisof@wsdot.wa.gov. Sinr}ely~ . ( (J__)!, "'"--V o~ J j,. d'J: Ramin Pazooki 0 Q Local Agency and Development Services Manager RP:fsp cc: Day/Project Files R. Roberts/ R. Bro\.VJ1, MS 120 CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 27th day of February, 2007, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner documents. This information was sent to: Name Reoresentina Jim Carleton, AHBL, Inc. Contact Howard Seelig Owner Tarragon -Cedar River Corp. Park, LLC Applicant (Signature of Sender): ~J;/Zi,{A.L ~,Clj( i , ··· -0 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. ,.,,*~~"''llii, ..,. q.\.-,,,...)/:W,~li Dated: 0-:), -l•J . .rt1~.Jlflf~~ '~ Notary (Print): \c\,yh~,-. t '{')Y\ Hc,9-\,y4n My appointment expires: .;i-I 1 '1 -1 c Project Name: Cedar River Corporate Park Project Number: LUA06-172, SA-H, ECF COMMENCING AT 9:00 AM, CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING March 6, 2007 AGENDA COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7TH FLOOR, RENTON CITY HALL The application(s) listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. PROJECT NAME: Paccar Parts Distribution Building Appeal PROJECT NUMBER: LUA06-139, ECF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is appealing the SEPA Mitigation Measure for a proposed Parts Distribution Center that states "All truck traffic associated within the distribution center shall be limitied to the hours between 7:00 am and 10:00 pm." The applicant appeals a change to this mitigation measure and to clarify the number of new daily trips to the facility. PROJECT NAME: Cedar River Corporate Park PROJECT NUMBER: LUA06-172, SA-H, ECF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval and Environmental Review for the construction of four office/retail/light industrial buildings totaling 143,307 square feet in area on a 539,272 square foot (12.4 acre) site located within the Light Industrial (IL) zoning designation and within the Employment Area -Valley overlay. Parking would be provided within a 408 stall surface parking lot around the perimeter of the site. Access to the project site would be provided via two commercial driveway entrances off of Lind Avenue SW. A Category 2 wetland is located along the northern property line and a Category 3 wetland is located along the southern and eastern property lines. HEX Agenda 3-6-07.doc 'I ' ••• \i l -'" l ~I ·P 'l I Ill :,,!, h11liai1m ' ' )1 ,- l· 0 m j: ' l -, I ' >l!::!Vd .d!::f 00 !::13Alli !::fV03'.) ~ m ), (Jl ~ -I m r m < ), ; 0 z -• -- -' z -0 ' ' .ll ' ' ; ~ I D p( m r· r m < [:i ), ; 1· 0 z n lo 11 ~ ,' ~ - ' .... ... , ''' ' (ll --, m u 0 \ ; ;( ·~ 0 0! ! ' ' 'I z 4:¥ [ . I ~ ), .... , .... '{I' 0 " C: ii-; - --If I rr-1,,i ' " r -r I-' I· ' ' CD ..... )> m r m < ), ; 0 z - - ~ ' ' ~ r 'r ' r ~ r 'r 0 [ I ! 0 ' E m (Jl ; ; m r m < ), ; 0 z 1 I !i Ill ' } "!! " ~i-~~~ =---i. - '-- -- F r - C r r - F .r r r .E = -- I ! J T ~r~~ L i =1---i I ~i·~~!~JJj·· ~----- ' I ----"----,-- J I I -----+---------. I I ·-·-·-·---j·-·-· ,, l~F~..r±t." -~~,·;-;';~~' <:f.m:&:~' ····•!\· e ! I r ·, i(Jl 0 [ --I ' I m r m < ); -I 0 z OJ ...... OJ ' ' ~ - ~';I 1;i1 ,' -, ' ~ - I = L l ± - = L ] T ,i . ~ ~ ~ :;1,, 'w ~ ~ 'i I ' ' !~ ' I~ ' D ,. 0 t- ' I I I : !! i D i J! • • i-t m,a =~ ,:.m ! ~ m ); (Jl ; -t ! ' m r m < l> -I 0 z m r m i -I 0 z ,r ~ f- ~ f- L L L -D -- I ... I .. O> I I ' z 0 ~ ~ -t I m r m < l> -I 0 z "' ' ' ~ 0 ~ C ' ~ +-i Kt: -::. r r rn l r 0 z ------------"' -ri j I : ,, ' Q ~ rn ' '~ rl.-"~=-::::;_[__ _______ --~-_-_.~" tu: L-, .. =--V I 11- 1 •f e.!-t • I . i • I . ,--1 : I I , :1 .. t :~ iii:.! .. .. vo l ~~ ' u ' . ir-f- 1 ! "' J_._' ------+--------i, ~ ]1 j -fl ·-----li I ,I 'I l -----1'. i ! \) ~ z ,[ Q ', J 1 Ill 7 1 J l ,, OCG ', I G I ~ ' t il ~".'i t---~--" _-. : ~ : ~ --§' I--' - 1i I " -f- f- ~ ~ ~ el" I ., 'i 0 C !, -,_ r L __ I- I:. Ii --. ' I -!j I-... !i ... ,! I-P' 1-, ,_ [ I- 0 f: I-l I-• ,! r ! I- h i I: Ii r ', I-ii. h '----h -LJ I ,: ! ' r ' ;, l H I- ,_ fo C I-~---I r \i I: f----I: ~ r f- f- n I-----,-r. i' r I: ' -,, r - ~ z 0 1- 1 > IU J IU ., " " Ji ~-- ' ' '. '· ~ ' 0 --r r r f--- ~----- ! -" u;; i! :;~ l £ z 0 I- 1 > IU J IU I-! If) 1 IU ' 1 ~ I- i > IU J IU I-' If) IU 3 ' if I (.) J, ..- al j, ' l I ,. ' ' 1, r -, -~ ~ T D 111 --"' i ., ' ' ' 0 illI!ll --""' ' ' r~ - ... ' ~i ! + li i, -[TI -~ It] --~ r r • - D: ,.;_ I -~ i ' z 0 1- 1 > IU J IU l r ~ ~· z ' I --·----·r, -:-:c: I 1 I e · --f~ -----L-j M I µ '---r----'------'1----~ I I : @t-- ' -+---,-,-----+ ---~~--------t--: I i ----1 - I I I ----I- I I t1------+- ,__ _____ L I I -----L I I ---+- I I I ~ _L I ,J I I . ' et-i--i}--r-f------f- , ~ '1 • I I }L I ----t--: r: ~ --:f I -' t_J tj ' ' :l . I h '.: t· I ~1 ; i ' ' 0 l ' -L~--I I .. ~ . -i_ .. ·--·-"'"""" l' ...a-. .. 1.r -. ~ , I ~ -=,,~, -_-@~ __ -__ -_c~';-; --4 ,--=-- I ~ L L '- 11 I L I=. L L ~f lo .._ 11 .._, I= t '- L L --L C. L L L L L L L L L L L -L --,I -ljil:_ -'i 0 - t:__ L' Cc ' ::c 1t C ,! -1, -.. - -------- I L - If - -- D ---- ' - ! -~ = - -<. - D ! : I'} -z D : a J J ru D C. - -' -- I C - -' 'I - I - 11 ft I, "" I ' ! ' I 1 ' ! i I ' f-I '1 ' t ' I _, G 1- 1 > w J w <] I-! <I) <( w ' n . J l I -_, ::' -- -- 3 -d ~ : - Ff ~ 0 o'l; ~: =€iw "~ m i z 0 I- 1 > w J w 1 t--!? oc o· z' z 0 - 1- 1 > w J w 1 I-~ J 0 tJ) t ' l' GI Cl ' i ;·{ .... 0 []J ' ,1" l' ' ,, L L ' C' 11 --------- J, C I -I - l -- I ---- -= D ~ I ·-·- = ~ ml ' ! I ~I ' i;;;; - 0 ~ -= --- ~---~ --- = --lo = - - - - r ft j, I z 0 - 1- 1 > w J w 1- <I) w 3, 7t St. IM IM IL [/) co s 0 ..q E-< IL IM IM IM IM CD CD CD IM CA CD CD 'U P::: CA CA >, Cl) --ro :>- SW 19th St. µ:i CD r- \@ '-------------' \ ' CD SW 21st St. \ CA CA CA CD 8 R-1 R-1 IH ~ ZONING ~ = TICHN1CAL SBB.VICIS H3 · 30 T23N R5E W 1/2 ----RenloD Cit,J' Llmlt,il 0 2yo t°° 1=-4-800 G3 19 T23N R5E W 1/2 5319 zc IING MAP BOO~ 74 B1 26 T24N R4E 92 B2 25 T24N R4~ 93 455 i \ 83 30 T2;4N ASE 28124N: ASE 459' -· , ,_ L______ . ....r----. 86 -g7 \~o/°°f24N RSE 26 T24N ~SE . 81 C1 35 T24N Fl4E· 94W C2 36 T24N R4E 45J5W C3 31 T24N RSE 32T24N R_SE 458 460. 464 i r---'-...#5 )C·s; ={i7 ,. ., "·, ' i 351124N ASE 3Q6 [)'1 2 T23N-R4E ,.,Kl:w., 11@08 ;-3Q9 03 \\04 • ~~3N ASE 4 T23N ASE 801 07 307 T23NA~ .E4 1 N: ff41= 9ff23N R5Ei 325', ' 326 'ii=:j\~~ JEi)/~ ... · .. . ' .. •-' \ ~~ ~~-. '"h3N:~~ \\ l3T23NR4E 1sT23N.ASE .'<1 ~7 3~"R5E 370 810. ,arrl ·· . .~1.'2¥7 F5 16 T23r{R5E: 334 ···,, \;335 ' .336 .33:7, 371 ' ',. 8J5\' ,, . 811> \' ; -;?<. __ ·, •.. < G1·· G2, ,.;. G-.6 .. ·.· . · ·G, 7 .. ·.· .. · .. · . . i" ' ?J,_., ). ".''\ ,. _a_r2aN.R4r -~~ T2aN R4E • . 22 T23N ~5E _,. 23 T23N ASE 44 !~1 '1-23! R4E 2~ Tf'3N RSE 605. 36 T23N A4E 607 J2 608 i . 609 610 . J ~=-~· -5•·4·.·>':~~·.·.'Ji 5 '1"T22N R4E .'~,-.\. __ .I},,.,, -"-. · __ . ·:· 6 T22N El5E.' 5 T22N R5E 4 T22N:BPE Bfi5JDfiNTIAL ~ Re1:1ource Con1:1ervation ~ Re1:1id.,ntial 1 du/ac ~ Re1:1id.,ntial 4 du/ac ~ Reaid.,ntial 8 du/ac ·. .. ·Mffl:P: lffl et:NTER [B .cell~r-. Vtn~i'\ lu:::-Nll u·rban··center -North I ' '• ~c-~I Urban Ceb.~er. -North 2 0 Cenblr IJowntf•n• 821 / .. 16 , ·r1 35 T23N ASE 833 J7 2 T22N ASE INDUSIRJAI G!iJ lndualrla.l -He&vy ~ lndu11trial -Medium 0 lnduatrial -Llght . '· . ·,,_· 1~r:-.L~'1,~erc~mce/Rellidential ~ Re1:1identlal Manufactured Homes l _ ...A. <P> Publlcly 01med ----Renton City Llmita ~ Residential 10 du/ac ~ R"'llidentlal 14 du/ac I RM-F"I Re11idential Kulti-Family ~'" COUM"ERClA.l Qi] ~.'n;q.,t"cial Arterial• ~ Co~~ercial Office• --Adjacent City Umilll -Book Pa,i:ea Boundary 2, E 36 ·. 8 1 T2 IRl!-T I Residential Kulti-Family Traditional IRH-U I Residential Kulti-Fa.mily Urba.n Center• @J Commercial Nei.a:hborhood PAGE • May include Overlay Diatri~lll. See Appendi.Jc map11 . For additional reeulations m Overlay Di11triclll, plea11e see RXC 4-3. Printed by Print & Mail Services. Ci!)' of Renton PAGE# INDEX CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: LUA06-172, SA-H, ECF Tarragon,LLC Cedar River Business Park DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval and Environmental Review for the construction of four office/retail/light industrial buildings totaling 143,307 square feet in area on a 539,272 square foot (12.4 acre) site located within the Light Industrial (IL) zoning designation and within the Employment Area • Valley overlay. Parking would be provided within 408 proposed parking stalls located around the perimeter of the buildings within a surface parking lot. Access to the project site would be provided via two commercial driveway entrances off of Lind Avenue SW. A Category 2 wetland is located along the northern property line and a Category 3 wetland is located along the southern and eastern property lines. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: MITIGATION MEASURES: East of Lind Avenue SW & South of SW 19th Street The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section 1. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations found in the geotechnical report prepared by Terra Associates, Inc, dated December 7, 2006. 2. The applicant shall be required to provide a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements outlined in Volume 11 of the 2005 Stormwater Management Manual and provide staff with a Construction Mitigation Plan prior to issuance of Construction Permits. This condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division. 3. The detention system for this project shall be required to comply with the requirements found in the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual to meet both detention (Conservation Flow control -a.k.a. Level 2) and water quality improvements. 4. The applicant shall pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee in the amount of $75 for each new net daily trip prior to the issuance of a building permit. It is anticipated that the proposed project would result in the payment of $74,925.00 (999 net new daily trips x $75 = $74,925.00). 5. Staff recommends that the applicant pay a Fire Mitigation Fee based on $0.52 per square foot of new commercial building area prior to the issuance of a building permit. The fee is estimated at $74,519.64 ($0.52 x 143,307 square feet= $74,519.64). ERC Mitigation Measures Page 1 of 1 0~~ • CIT~F RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E,, Administrator \~; Kathy Keolker, Mayor ~\'V'l'o"',-----------------..---------------- February 22, 2007 Jim Carleton AHBL, Inc. 2215 N 301h Street #300 Tacoma, WA 98403 SUBJECT: Cedar River Corporate Park LUA06-172, SA-H, ECF Dear Mr. Carleton: This letter is to inform you that the appeal period has ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERG) Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERG determination. This decision is final and the applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures outlined in the Report and Decision dated January 27, 2007. In addition, a Hearing Examiner Public Hearing has been scheduled for March 6, 2007, where Site Plan Conditions may be issued. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant are required to be present. A copy of the Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner will be forwarded to you prior to the public hearing for your review. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, ())J 1( ;[2· LK.Ding ·11 V ~1 ~nior Planner l/ cc: Howard Seelig / Owner Tarragon -Cedar River Corp. Park, LLC I Applicant _______ I0_5_5_S_ou-th-G-ra-dy_W_a_y---R-en-to_n_, -,\-,.a-,h-in_g_to_n_9_8_05_7 _______ ~ ~ AHEAD OF THE CURVE ~ Thi$ oaner contains 50~·1:: mcw:Jed rn.::iteria/. 30% oos\ eotisumer ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION & PUBLIC HEARING ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Cedar River Corporate Park PROJECT NUMBER: LUA08-172, SA·H, ECF LOCATION: Eu.I of Lind Avenue SW and South of SW 19" Street DESCRIPTION: The applicant ,s reque5t1ng H,:,aring Examiner Sita Plan approval and Envlronmental Review for the eonatruction of four off1celreta1l/l1ght ,ndustrlal buildings totaling 143,307 square feet In area on a 539,272 equare loot (12.4 acre) sHe located within the Light lnduslrlal (ILi zoning dnlgnation and within the Empl<.Jyment Area -Valley overlay. Parking would be provided within 408 propoHd parking 8talle located around lhe perimeter ol th,e buildings within a surface parking lot. Accan to Iha proje<:l site would bl! provided viii two comm11rclal drlvl!Way entrances off ol Lind Avenue SW. A Category 2 w11Uand (& located along the north11m prop11rty lin11 arid a Category 3 wetland is loc~ted along the aouthem and nslem property llmts THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL R[VICVI/ COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVl: A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT AppHla of th1111nvironm11ntal d11t11rmlnation mus1 be filed in writing on or bolore 5:00 PM on February 19, 2007 AppHls must be !lied In writing tog11ther wiU, the required $15.00 appllcatlon fee with: Hearing Examiner, City ol Rllnton, 1055 SOU!h Grady Way. Renton. WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are govern$d by City of Reroton Munlclpal Code StM:llon 4-B-110.B. Additional ,nformation regarding the appeal proces" may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430~~10 A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY I HE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE 7TH FLOOR OF CITY HALL. 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY, RENTON, WASHINGTON. ON MARCH 6, 2007 AT 9·00 AM TO CONSIDER THE SITE PLAN. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINA rlON IS APPEALED, THE APPEAL WILL BE HEARD AS PART OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING FOR FURTHER INFORMATION Pl FASE CONl A.CT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Pleaae lnclud• th• project NUMBER when calling for pro~r file Identification. CERTIFICATION I, >Em <3,=ISFg_ , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in __.z._ conspicuous places or nearby the described property 9..~·.C,\\,.,.111!1 ,,,....:...r .. "If~~·•,, DA TE:--=2--Z.=-<51--=-c,c.__ __ _ SIGNED: 1-/ ~/~ o.,:,, . ;'~~~~ 7o/f=?) )/ , ,0,t;,' ~ ~~-· ~} 't,.~ :. ,, .,"' C . }-".'II:,-; -,, . "\ . •. .... ·,~~'; ~ ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Puhlic, in and for the State of Washington rcsid~g i~ _ :: :;.. . .(, .i:z§ , on the 5 I:" '·, .•1""\.. \ . ./:: 0-.. ~iiW ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION & PUBLIC HEARING ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Cedar River Corporate Park PROJECT NUMBER: LUAOS-172, SA-H, ECF LOCATION: East of Lind Avenue SW and South of SW 19th Street DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval and Environmental Review for the construction of four office/retail/light industrial buildings totaling 143,307 square feet in area on a 539,272 square foot (12.4 acre} site located within the Light Industrial (IL) zoning designation and within the Employment Area -Valley overlay. Parking would be provided within 408 proposed parking stalls located around the perimeter of the buildings within a surface parking lot. Access to the project site would be provided via two commercial driveway entrances off of Lind Avenue SW. A Category 2 wetland is located along the northern property line and a Category 3 wetland is located along the southern and eastern property lines THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERG) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on February 19, 2007. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE 7TH FLOOR OF CITY HALL, 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON MARCH 6, 2007 AT 9:00 AM TO CONSIDER THE SITE PLAN. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, THE APPEAL WILL BE HEARD AS PART OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. + ..&l + CI. OF RENTON Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator ,,~,'\'Y O<'t) '-' '~" '? -? Kathy Keolker, Mayor . ~'N'fO'.)"'------------------------------ February 1, 2007 Jim Carleton AHBL, Inc. 2215 N 30 1" Street #300 Tacoma, WA 98403 SUBJECT: Cedar River Corporate Park LUA06-172, SA-H, ECF Dear Mr. Carleton: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERG) to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project and have issued a threshold Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. Please refer to the enclosed ERG Report and Decision, Section C for a list of the Mitigation Measures. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on February 19, 2007. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.8. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington, on March 6, 2007 at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Plan. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425) 430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, 4» 1( ;J2· v7f~n~~~~~~nner U cc: 621 Company -Howard Seelig / Owner( s) Tarragon -Cedar River Corporate Park, LLC / Applicant Enclosure -------10_5_5_S_ou_t_h_G_ra_d_y_W_a_y---R-en-to_n_, -W-as-h-in-g-to_n_9_8_05_7 _______ ~ ~ Th1<on:>n<>c,-.r,nt:i1nc'-.no,;,=,1,-l<>rlm=it<>ri:01 ~0%...........:c!rrino:c,,n,,,,, AIIEAD OF TIIF. CURVE CI" T OF RENTON Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E,, Administrator ~~~ ~ ~ ,; Kathy Keolker, Mayor ~N~O~''--------------------------- February 1, 2007 Washington Slate Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on January 29, 2007: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: Cedar River Corporate Park LUA06-172, SA-H, ECF East of Lind Avenue SW & South of SW 19'" Street The applicant is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval and Environmental Review for the construction of four office/retail/light industrial buildings totaling 143,307 square feet in area on a 539,272 square foot (12.4 acre) site located within the Light Industrial (IL) zoning designation and within the Employment Area -Valley overlay. Parking would be provided within 408 proposed parking stalls located around the perimeter of the buildings within a surface parking lot. Access to the project site would be provided via two commercial driveway entrances off of Lind Avenue SW. A Category 2 wetland Is located along the northern property line and a Category 3 wetland is located along the southern and eastern property lines. Appeals of the erivironmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on February 19, 2007. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Exan;iiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appe~I process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, /l '--// 'j)- n, cf;/~ ng Senior Planner U cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division WDFW, Stewart Reinbold David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources WSDOT, Noethwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Karen Walter, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Melissa Calvert, Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program US Army Corp. of Engineers Stephanie Kramer, Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation ~E~n~cl=os=u~re~---l-0-55_S_ou_t_h_G_r-ad_y_W_a_y ___ R_e_nt-o-n,-\-"/./-as-h-in-g-to_n_9-80_5_7 ________ ~ 6i\ Th1i:: n.:in,:,r~()m::,,n« S0°/. rPrvdF'rl m,rt,.ri,ol '.'In~,;, nrnst """''" ,mF!r AHEAD OF THE CURVE CITY OF RENTt. .. DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES. APPLICATION NO(S): LUA06-172, SA-H, ECF APPLICANT: Tarragon, LLC PROJECT NAME: Cedar River Business Park DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval and Environmental Review for the construction of four office/retail/light industrial buildings totaling 143,307 square feet in area on a 539,272 square foot (12.4 acre) site located within the Light Industrial (IL) zoning designation and within the Employment Area -Valley overlay. Parking would be provided within 408 proposed parking stalls located around the perimeter of the buildings within a surface parking lot. Access to the project site would be provided via two commercial driveway entrances off of Lind Avenue SW. A Category 2 wetland is located along the northern property line and a Category 3 wetland is located along the southern and eastern property lines. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: MITIGATION MEASURES: East of Lind Avenue SW & South of SW 191" Street The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section 1. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations found in the geotechnical report prepared by Terra Associates, Inc, dated December 7, 2006. 2. The applicant shall be required to provide a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements outlined in Volume II of the 2005 Stormwater Management Manual and provide staff with a Construction Mitigation Plan prior to issuance of Construction Permits. This condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division. 3. The detention system for this project shall be required to comply with the requirements found in the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual to meet both detention (Conservation Flow control -a.k.a. Level 2) and water quality improvements. 4. The applicant shall pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee in the amount of $75 for each new net daily trip prior to the issuance of a building permit. It is anticipated that the proposed project would result in the payment of $74,925.00 (999 net new daily trips x $75 = $74,925.00). 5. Staff recommends that the applicant pay a Fire Mitigation Fee based on $0.52 per square foot of new commercial building area prior to the issuance of a building permit. The fee is estimated at $74,519.64 ($0.52 x 143,307 square feet= $74,519.64). ERC Mitigation Measures Page 1 of 1 CITY OF RENTL .. DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S) APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: LUA06-172, SA-H, ECF Tarragon, LLC Cedar River Business Park DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval and Environmental Review for the construction of four office/retail/light industrial buildings totaling 143,307 square feet in area on a 539,272 square foot (12.4 acre) site located within the Light Industrial (IL) zoning designation and within the Employment Area -Valley overlay. Parking would be provided within 408 proposed parking stalls located around the perimeter of the buildings within a surface parking lot. Access to the project site would be provided via two commercial driveway entrances off of Lind Avenue SW. A Category 2 wetland is located along the northern property line and a Category 3 wetland is located along the southern and eastern property lines. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: East of Lind Avenue SW & South of SW 19'" Street The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning 1. RMC section 44-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 prn, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division 2. Commercial, multi-family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 3. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. 4. A detailed landscape plan complying with the requirements set forth under RMC 4-8-120D shall be submitted at the time of Building Permit review for review and approval by the Development Services Division Project Manager. Fire 1. The preliminary fire flow is 5,000 GPM for Building D, 4,750 GPM for Building C, and 4,000 GPM for Building A. One hydrant is required within 150 feet of each structure and four additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of Buildings A and 3 and three for Buildings B and D. A 12-inch looped water main is required to handle the increased fire flow demands. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of the required sprinkler and fire alarm systems. 3. Fire department access roadways are required to within 150 feet of all portions of the building exterior. Roadways are a minimum of 20 feet in width with a turning radius of 45 feet outside and 25 feet inside. ERC Advisory Notes Page 1 of 3 4. Fire department dead en, :ess roadways over 150 feet in length arf. uired to have an approved turnaround. 5. Provide a list of flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are used or stored onsite. 6. A site plan for Pre-Fire planning is required to be submitted for your project. This shall be submitted prior to occupancy. 7. Street address must be visible from a public street. Plan Review -Surface Water 1. Surface Water System Development Charges are based on a rate of $0.265 x the total square feet of the new impervious surface area. This fee is payable prior to issuance of the utility construction permit. 2. A preliminary drainage plan and drainage report has been submitted with the site plan application. The report addressed detention and water quality requirements as outlined in the 2005 King County Surface Water Manual. 3. This site is located within the City's designated 100-year flood zone. Finish floors of the new buildings shall be a minimum of one foot above flood zone elevation. A FEMA Elevation Certificate will be required to be submitted at building permit. 4. If filling or grading on the site is below elevation 13.5, compensatory storage will be required to be provided. Plan Review -Water 1. Water System Development Charges are based on a rate of $0.273 x the site's gross square footage of 539,272. Estimated fee based on the site plan is $147,221.25. This fee is payable prior to issuance of the utility construction permit. 2. Preliminary fire flow required by the fire department is 5,000 gpm. Five hydrants are required for this project. One hydrant is required within 150 feet and four additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of all structures. 3. Ex1ension of 12-inch water main onsite, providing a looped system and installation of hydrants will be required to serve the site. It is shown on the site plan, however applicant will need to increase the 10-inch main shown on the site plan to a 12-inch water main. Applicant will also be required to tie into an existing 8-inch water main to the east. It has been shown on the plans. 4. Fire sprinkler systems are required. A separate utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation of the double detector check valve assembly to the fire sprinkler systems. All devices installed shall be per the latest Department of Health "Approved List" of Backfiow Prevention Devices. Civil plans show location of device and should note: "Separate plans and utility permit for DDCVA installation for Fire Sprinkler System will be required". For DDCVA installations inside the building, applicant shall submit a copy of the mechanical plan showing the location and installation of the backfiow assembly inside the mechanical room. Installation shall be in accordance with the City of Renton's requirements. DDCVA shall be installed immediately after the pipe has passed through the building floor slab. Installation of devices shall be in the horizontal position only. 5. Landscape irrigation systems will require a separate permit for the irrigation meter and approved backflow device is required to be installed. A plumbing permit will be required. 6. Buildings that exceed 30 feet in height will require a backflow device to be installed on domestic water meter. Plan Review -Sanitary Sewer 1. Sewer System Development Charges are based on a rate of $0.142 x the site's gross square footage of 539,272. Estimated fee based on the site plan is $76,576 62 This fee is payable prior to issuance of the utility construction permit. 2. An 8-inch sanitary sewer main extension is required to serve the site. It has been shown on the plans. 3. IF FOOD PREPARATION FACILITIES (RESTAURANTS, KITCHENS, CAFES, ETC.) ARE PROPOSED, A GREASE TRAP OR GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE REQUIRED. A SEPARATE PLUMBING PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED. 4. If finished floor elevation is below 25 feet, a "tideflex" or similar backflow device will be required to be installed. 5. Side sewer (s) shall have a minimum of 2% slope. ERC Advisory Notes Page 2 of 3 Plan Review -Transportation 1. Installation of sidewalk and additional paving will be required fronting the site in Lind Ave SW. 2. A traffic study has been submitted and reviewed. Preliminary review indicates a center turn lane may be required to provide access to and from the site at the south entrance to the site. Additional information is required. 3. The applicant has submitted a request to waive installation of street improvements in SW 21" and SW 23"' required by code. Plan Review -Miscellaneous 1. Construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. 2. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 3. Rockeries or walls to be constructed greater than 4 feet in height will require a separate building permit and the following note shall be added to the civil plans: "Rockeries greater than 4 feet in height will require a separate building permit. A licensed engineer with geo-technical expertise must be retained for proposed rockeries greater than four feet in height. The engineer must monitor rockery construction and verify in writing that the rockery was constructed in general accordance with ARC standards and with his/her supplemental recommendations, in a professional manner and of competent and suitable material. Written verification by the engineer must be provided to the City of Renton public works inspector prior to approval of an occupancy permit or plat approval for the project." Plan Review -General 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 3. Separate permits and fees for side sewers, water meters, landscape irrigation meters, and any back/low devices will be required. 4. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate and application fee shall be submitted at the sixth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use, but prior to preparing a check, it is recommended to call 425-430-7266 for a fee estimate as generated by the permit system. 5. Applicant shall be responsible for securing easements for public utilities. Property Services 1. See attached fee sheet. E RC Advisory Notes Page 3 of 3 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA06-172, SA-H, ECF APPLICANT: Tarragon, LLC PROJECT NAME: Cedar River Business Park DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval and Environmental R&view for the construction of four office/retail/light industrial buildings totaling 143,307 square feet in area on a 539,272 square foot (12.4 acre) site located within the Light Industrial (IL) zoning designation and within the Employment Area -Valley overlay. Parking would be provided within 408 proposed parking stalls located around the perimeter of the buildings within a surface parking lot. Access to the project site would be provided via two commercial driveway entrances off of Lind Avenue SW. A Category 2 wetland is located along the northern property line and a Category 3 wetland is located along the southern and eastern property lines. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: East of Lind Avenue SW & South of SW 19'" Street The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on February 19, 2007. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES: Terry Higashiyama, Administrator Community Services February 3, 2007 January 29, 2007 date ' avid Daniels, Fire Chief Fire Department I ~'21-07 Date ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING NOTICE January 29, 2007 To: Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator I. David Daniels, Fire Chief Alex Pietsch, EDNSP Administrator From: Jennifer Henning, Development Planning Meeting Date: Monday, January 29, 2007 Time: 3:00 PM Location: Sixth Floor Conference Room #620 Agenda listed below. Cedar River Business Park (Ding) LUAOG-172, SA-H, ECF The applicant is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval and Environmental Review for the construction of four office/retail/light industrial buildings totaling 143,307 square feet in area on a 539,272 square foot (12.4 acre) site located within the Light Industrial (IL) zoning designation and within the Employment Area -Valley overlay. Parking would be provided within 408 proposed parking stalls located around the perimeter of the buildings within a surface parking lot. Access to the project site would be provided via two commercial driveway entrances off of Lind Avenue SW. A Category 2 wetland is located along the northern property line and a Category 3 wetland is located along the southern and eastern property lines. T-Mobile Monopole Kennydale (Ding/ LUAOG-173, CU-H, ECF The applicant is requesting Administrative Conditional Use Permit approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the installation of a 59-foot 11-inch Monopole 1 structure and associated equipment cabinets. The project site is approximately 600 square feet of WSDOT right-of-way. Access to the project site would be provided off of Meadow Avenue N. cc: K. Keolker, Mayor J. Covington, Chief Administrative Officer S. Dale Estey, EDNSP Director® J. Gray, Fire Prevention N. Watts, P/B/PW Development Services Director ® F. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner L. Rude, Fire Prevention ® J. Medzegian, Council P. Hahn. P/B/PW Transportation Systems Director R. Lind, Economic Development L. Warren, City Attorney ® ' ; I !ll !Odi cs! l " ' i dH, ,i q s i ij; j ~ i; l:i ~ !i l q l z; U I ni -eeeee -----r ' • ' ~ m ), (Jl ; -t m r m \ ), ~ 0 l ··-.----D , z ~ ~ r f- f- ~ fl( s o I s i 1-, i , .. ~ ' == - ' '1--t-- . I: ei 0 I ti I r f- f- f- r [ 1,, ~ 1f ,, n 0 ~ ' ~ ' ' I , m r· m <: ), ~ ~. 0 z o I m r m \ rr, +.--!I ), ~ H, _._+-l"tn 0 l 0 ' E m . (Jl ~ m r m <: ), ~ 0 l ---- . •·--- 1' c= ~~. I u = ---n ,I ,, -= --. -- : -f-= 0 f- f- f-' ~ f- ID • f- '' f-,, l - ' --,-- /1 --.,, -11 - i ~ ' f- !: f- f- f- ~ 0 l !j ~ i ~ f-lj f-·-f- f-... ... 0 ... ... ce· --·- = - - ~ ~1 i ' c= " I ,, ~c=J --·----~-.,.-... , ... _ .. ___ .... _ _..._,_ •.. if--~ . Cf? ., "" ... ~-~ ",, j ~·· ·.-'' . i / I ! ! .. / . i I i / / j I ,>' i , . i i ' ~i / -1-- '11 '.·-r--. Y. I r I, :, • I '0 I ''' I ;' ~ ~ .. j-_ I I I =--::ii_-++ :~ ,; ' ' ---1 ~ I 1-- 1 I --__ _j __ ----- 1 I l~i~r--M-C'C'1 ,<;'.;'.~~' '~/ .. -.>%· I • l(J) 0 ( ' -j ' I m r m < )> -j 0 z CJ ...... CJ I =-~ 0 --- -... I ea - 11 TI ,- ' ,. =-~ 0 -r-, ' I I I - ~ - ~ ' ~ - ~ 0 ~ ~ - ,. i I ,, I 1 ,-!\' I !~ m!f ' fG :;,m ·! l! ' m ):, (ll ~ 1 ! i m r m < ):, -j 0 z m r m < ):, -j 0 z lj ,, a ' z I~ 0 ~ \ -j I 1' m r m < -4 )> -j 0 z ' u ] ii ~{ I I ' ' I !! Tr E ilJ H Ir 'I u l ' 11 -' I u ;;:,, ,, a ' ' ~ h h 0 C: I, !• 1! J 11 I ir. Ii ,, ,_ ~~ I· i I ,! ' ' ,, 'I I I ' I " .. f> ,, I I I 'I ' .. ,. :• : -.i :! I ... ·1 ! ill :1.1. 1111!ia1m1 i -:.-.; -&I 1"""' -------r--r----ri1-=--.:..:1l I 1 J i; J 0 1' 1--, . T 1 .. ~ I ~ 'I -, I ----·· C----o ~u·· 'I :,:,!,_ I ]fl. I I ! 2 I I - i ~ I, - t:: ,, -i! re :; il D i:: f ~ L __ : : I ~· j ;I 1r I I I i. i @. i-; I --;:·-~ 4J:=1 t -1 ~ii ; '1 I -Ir --• ------z\ 0+-:--1- I, ~~ !; i: h 1! ';, !I t= '--D ' ~ l -• ' ,-! •! ,- !! 11 i: ,- tb i, ,-"b c:_ f-. r ,- I ' i: i -' -l I! ~- '--fo ,- \) - ' ~ i C: z ~ 'i ' ). ,-"·--: t----,-~ -+---rl --f t ' I~ I () ~ J - ~ ·1 '¥ ~ ru ·-+-t:. ~ D ~ -z -1 [i I --~ ~ J I -0 ~ ~ ~ ! ll' -I 0 1 I Q. ,. Fl ' J. I ll ~ t,__1_ ~ i, z I} - I- 1 > Ill J Ill 1 • I-' J. 0 d) ~ ' ,, I ' ;: D - r r r - r ~ ~ r z I} 1- 1 > Ill J Ill 1 ' z ! l !: ! I} . . ) \) . I, ,, j : .l' li l, l ~ .. k.· 1d, ~; Ill ,, <IH !! lle-+·1-:o t:._ z 0 I- 1 > .. Ill J Ill ' I-' <I). Ill 3 ' - I- 1 > Ill J Ill I. I-! ll' 0 z ' ~ Ii Q~ ' Cl l ' ' ,~ !11 ,.... I .~ ' ID ) ~ID; i• i l j ~ <J I I .i <9 ... ~ .. I . L L I:" L L Mt¥ L L L L L L ;, -·1 :I . ' L '- n i:: z - 0 - -i :::: I- 1 L > I: UI J ~-UI I I-~ 0 fTT oc J o· I '-'- •• i:: 11 '-'-:::d "' ii u ~ ! L-,_ - C -- --I:" I- I- i t.· li / . -,.fJ . I -11 s r i1 z i L I- I' I:: '-I ,, '-. ' n -,, -' !i 0 i:: ! ' .. :.:: I:, J .I I:, 1; C ,, l 12._ I -' -! I~ -! I -- 11 L I l L 0 I:: ! L L • ' I i 1--Sc i:: --- ' I: 0 [[ i I-~ I- L . I- : <j) L - I 0 ,:- ~ ~ -- C -- -- - I =- l=1 z z 0 z 0 -0 -I-I: - I-1 I- 1 > i i 1 I > UI I > UI J IO I UI J w C J w w i - I-~ I I -I-~ -I- d) J I -d) ' -1 0 ~ w w ' d} ~ ! I H 3 Hi o?i F3 · 18 T23N R5E W 1/2 7t St. IM CA IM IM IM IM CA w ""' cd u c:n <l) ~ <l) <l) !> c:n <t: CA lfJ cd s IM 0 .c IM E-< S'll \ Q\,\'-St. IM CA IM N ' ... s l'ol l'ol .... ,:,:: ! qt. IM ~ -[ii IM 16th ~ ""' c:n s (L) ' IM !> <t: "O CD CD ~ 0 s cd 0:: ,f=I L:::C,::=========: ~-----C~D r-+=====;--' CD CD SW 21st St. ' I I R-1 \@ I \ (X)· I \ "' CD R-1 IH ~ ZONING H3 . 3~-==~~ .. ~:.. 1/ 2 ~ = TBCHNICAL SBB.VICBS 0 200 400 1:4-800 G3 19 T23N R5E W 1/2 5319 ZOte\JG MAP BOOK 7 92 93 455"( ' I 81 82 83 ' 26 T24N A4E 25 T24N R4E; 30 T.~4N A5E 459 l . l..-·----·-· ->_ B6 -g7- .,.Klf .. ,1<>N I • , ·-27_124~ ASE 26 T24N RsE .81 94W ' C1 C2 35 T24N R4E" 36T24N R4E 31 T24N ASE 306 307 lAKFSWA 1118(,8 ; ,309 ... ····801 '·;.,; Dt D3 2.T~3N;R4E ' _a_1t ·._.E2 ' 326' /F1\t -4 t23N R4E. · ".,_,\ 13 f23N f14E >y 1a·tiJN.RpE\.:: < · 334 44 22N A4E \335 336 ' ' ~2 .. ···.~1' \.Jl '. -~-:-, 24 T2 R4E q4 fr1 !12 . . ' 2 !f23~ R4E 36 't23N R4E . 607 J2 lT22N R41:: RESIDENTIAL ~ Resouroe Conservation ~ Reaidenlial 1 du/ac ~ Re!li.dential 4 du/ac ~ Rnidenlial a du/ac 600 [~~.J RellidenUal Manufactured Homes ~ Ruidenllal ID du/ac I R-141 Re6ldenllal 14 du/11.c I RM-rl Residential Multi-Family IRr-t-TI ReeidenUal Multi-Family Traditional IRr-t-uf ReeidenUal Multi-Family Ur!nn Center• \. \~D4 [)7 T23N"R5E 4 T23N,A5E' .3~ E4 ·.E·,.·.·5. .,·' ,' •' :. '"',o . · •.. 9'T23N ASE 370 14 123N ASE .. 816 2• '901 602' 821 H6: :. ····-H·7.··· -· 'C. ·-,--·, --, ~ ' ' 25 605> 825 , 82_& 8 .. 16'" ··, "1·1·····. •,•, \_» ..,._. . ;,, 15., 33T23N a& :.· T23N ASE 35 T23N RSE 36 J7 2 T22N ASE 1 T2 ~ Commarcial Arterial• ~ Commercial Office- INlllJSTRlAL ~ " " .... " m In due trial -Heavy ' 0 lnduelrlal -Medium 0 Industrial -Ught (P) Publicly o,rned --Renton City Limit,, ---Adjacent City Limit,, -Book Pa1es Boundary ~ Commercial Neill\borhood ,eou. PAGE • )lay include Olrerlay Districts, See Appendi:ic maps, For additional re1ulations in 0-,.erlay Districts, please see RMC 4--3. Prinled by Print & Mail S9!Vice:s, City of Renton PAGE# INDEX )PERTY SERVICES FEE REVIEW #2 ;Q. DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET D PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP 'fl... ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET D APPLICANT: .. ··~· ',f/ ··) (C(7,/1v1t ~if~(-~ LL(.__ o:;;;EIVEDFROM',,.O,kt/. \''-l_(_, JOB ADDRESS: r , 'i_tJ' S i V. /'1 th '?f--; . , WO# " (date) NATURE OF WORK: ,rl /1 t e ! v -i' /a, 1,11,, ,,! ~ ,,t,J,)1/l \ l'L')1,N.rlzcO GREEN# ______ _ ~ SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES APPLIED NEED MORE INFORMATION, 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION }.; SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES ESTIMATED O SQUARE FOOTAGE D VICINITY MAP 0 NOT APPROVED FOR APPLICATION OF FEES O FRONT FOOTAGE O OTHER 0 VESTED O NOT VESTED D This ree review supersedes and cancels fee review # dated ~ ~A J. rl\ A /.. ) 7 < · · --D PARENT PID# (subject to change)~ SUBJECTPROPERTYPIDH_J'l:JrW ·-c~ :('.) D KingCo.TaxAcct#(new) --------- Triggering mechanisms for the SDC fees will be based on current City ordinances and determined by the applicable Utility Section. Final fees wilt be based on rates in effect at time of Building Permit/Construction Permit application. The following quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees, side sewer permits, r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PARCEL METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NO. "10. ASSESSMENT UNITS OD FEE Latecomer Agreement (ovt) WATER ---· Latecomer Aereement (nvt)WASTEWATER .•. .. , ... ,---· Latecomer Agreement (pvt)OTHER . Special Assessment District/WATER . . ·:-,.•< Special Assessment District/WASTEWATER .. Joint Use Ai,reement (METRO) .............. Local Improvement District • Traffic Benefit Zones $75.00 P.ER TRIP, CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION FUTURE OBLIGATIONS / SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE -WATER /El #OF UNITS/ SDCFEE D Pd Prev. D Partiallv Pd (Ltd Exemntion) Never Pd SQ. FTG. Single family residential $1,956/unit x ' Mobile home dwelling unit $1,956/unit in park Apartment, Condo $1,174/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial, $0.273/sq. ft. of prooerty (not less than $1,956.00) x 17;.l. C\. z.·-1 'l '1 /LI.?-;?z_./ I I .• Boeing, by Special Agreement/Footprint of Bldg plus 15 ft perimeter (2,1100 GPM ttireshold> I , SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE -WASTEWATER D Pd Prev. D Partiallv Pd (Ltd Exemotion) ti Never I'd Sim!le familv residential dwelline unit $1,017/unit x Mobile home dwelline unit $1,017 /unit x Apartment, Condo $610/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial, $0.142/s . ft. of ro rt (not less than $1,017.00) X /.-j J) '1 . '7 -; '7 t<fr,., . S 1 t,, . Iv L ...... . .. i I<!' D~ NOT Annlv D May Annly SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SURFACEWATER D Pd Prev. D Partiallv Pd (Ltd Exemotion) l7i Never Pd Single family residential and mobile home dwelline unit $759/unit x All other properties $0.265/sq ft of new impervious area of property x 4/c,) 144 Ii ( 11 ;'Z3Z, 14) (not less than $7 59. 00) ' I PRELIMINARY TOTAL $ ,J.-;.!:", /,1~17! ,t1Jh .. , '-I: I . ' .. ,, . I/ ~ " 0 • 0 " ..., " · Signa re of e'v1ewl~ Authority DA TE * !;subject property is within an LID, it is developer's responsibility to check with the Finance Dept. for paid/un-paid status. ** If an additional water meter (or hydrant) is being installed for fire protection or an additional water meter is being installed for private landscape irrigation, please advise as above fees may change. ..... < •· G::. \§--ro • ',.:, " 0 EFFECTIVE: January 2, 2007 Cit;·"'' Renton Department of Planning I Building I I, .c Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 19, 2007 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-172, SA-H, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 5, 2007 APPLICANT: Tarra on, LLC PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Din PROJECT TITLE: Cedar River Co orate Park PLAN REVIEW: Jan Illian SITE AREA: 539,272 s uare feet BUILDING AREA ross : 143,307 s LOCATION: E of Lind Ave SW & S of SW 191 " St I WORK ORDER NO: 77706 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval and Environmental Review for the construction of four office/retail/light industrial buildings totalling 143,307 square feet in area on a 539,272 square foot (12.4 acre) site located within the Light Industrial (IL) zoning designation and within the Employment Area -Valley overlay. Parking would be provided within a surface parking lot around the perimeter of the site. Access to the project site would be provided via two commercial driveway entrances off of Lind Avenue SW. A Category 2 wetland is located along the northern property line and a Category 3 wetland is located along the southern and eastern property lines. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housino Air Aesthetics Water Uaht!Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Trans{)(lrtation Environmental Health Public Services Energy! Historic!Cufturaf Natura! Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS /-, ,I Cit:_ .. Renton Department of Planning I Building I .. ,J.ic Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: u ~s,,. c,.()h,., n ) ecv,uc!, COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 19, 2007 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-172, SA-H, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 5, 2007 APPLICANT: Tarraoon, LLC PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Dina PROJECT TITLE: Cedar River Corporate Park PLAN REVIEW: Jan Illian SITE AREA: 539,272 souare feet BUILDING AREA lorossl: 143,307 souare feet LOCATION: E of Lind Ave SW & S of SW 19th St WORK ORDER NO: 77706 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval and Environmental Review for the constructio:i of four office/retail/light industrial buildings totalling 143,307 square feet in area on a 539,272 square foot (12.4 acre) site located ,,ithin the Light Industrial (IL) zoning designation and within the Employment Area -Valley overlay. Parking would be provided within a surface parking lot around the perimeter of the site. Access to the project site would be provided via two commercial driveway entrances off of Lind Avenue SW. A Category 2 wetland is located along the northern property line and a Category 3 wetland is located along the southern and eastern property lines. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the-Probable Probable More F.nviranment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Element of the Probable Probable Mon, Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary f-E,1rto Housin'"' Ai~ Aesthetics Water Linht!Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Trans--"'ation Environmental Health ~. Energy/ r~•,ra/ Resou,ces L __ Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservafion Airporl Environment 10,000 Feer 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 2--C-'C, 3- 5o ;-fr ()..erorf We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ( oz Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM January 19, 2007 Jill Ding Jan Illian x 7216 CEDAR RIVER COIU'ORATE PARK Lind Ave SW between SW 21" and SW 23'• Street LUA 06-172 I have reviewed the application for the Cedar River Corporate Park (12.4 acre site) located generally at Lind Ave SW between SW 21" and SW 23'• Street and have the following comments: EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER SEWER STORM STREETS There is a 24-inch water main in Lind Ave SW. See water drawing 27-0192. Available derated fire flow in the area is 5,500 gpm. Pressure available is approximately 78 psi. The proposed project is located in the 196 water pressure zone and is outside an Aquifer Protection Zone. There is an 8-inch sewer main in Lind Ave SW. There are storm drainage facilities in Lind Ave SW. There is curb and street lighting fronting the site in Lind Ave SW. There are no street improvements fronting the site in SW 21" or SW 23"' Street. CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1. Water System Development Charges are based on a rate of $0.273 x the site's gross square footage of 539,272. Estimated fee based on the site plan is $147,221.25. This fee is payable prior to issuance of the utility construction permit.. 2. Preliminary fire flow required by the fire department is 5,000 gpm. Five hydrants are required for this project. One hydrant is required within 150 feet and four additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of all structures. 3. Extension of 12-inch water main onsite, providing a looped system and installation of hydrants will be required to serve the site. It is shown on the site plan, however applicant will need to increase the JO-inch main shown on the site plan to a 12-inch water main. Applicant will also be required to tie into an existing 8-inch water main to the east. It has been shown on the plans. 4. Fire sprinkler systems are required. A separate utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation of the double detector check valve assembly to the fire sprinkler systems. All devices installed shall be per the latest Department of Health '·Approved List" ofBackflow Prevention Devices. Civil plans Cedar River Corporate Park 0[/[ 9/2007 Page 2 of 3 show location of device and should note: "Separate plans and utility permit for DDCVA installation for Fire Sprinkler System will be required". For DDCV A installations inside the building, applicant shall submit a copy of the mechanical plan showing the location and installation of the back/low assembly inside the mechanical room. Installation shall be in accordance with the City of Renton ·s requirements. DDCV A shall be installed immediately after the pipe has passed through the building floor slab. Installation of devices shall be in the horizontal position only. 5. Landscape irrigation systems will require a serarate permit for the irrigation meter and approved back/low device is required to be installed. A plumbing pem1it will be required. 6. Buildings that exceed 30 feet in height will require a back/low device to be installed on domestic water meter. SANITARY SEWER I. Sewer System Development Charges are based on a rate of $0.142 x the site's gross square footage of 539,272, Estimated fee based on the site plan is $76,576.62, This fee is payable prior to issuance of the utility construction permit. 2. An 8-inch sanitary sewer main extension is required to serve the site. It has been shown on the plans. 3. If food preparation facilities (restaurants, kitchens, cafes, etc.) are proposed, a grease trap or grease interceptor will be required. A separate plumbing permit will be required. 4. If finished floor elevation is below 25 feet, a "tide/lex" or similar backflow device will be required to be installed. 5. Side sewer (s) shall have a minimum of 2% slope. SURFACE WATER I. Surface Water System Development Charges are based on a rate of $0.265 x the total square feet of the new impervious surface area. Estimated fee based on the site plan 1s . This fee is payable prior to issuance of the utility construction permit. 2. A preliminary drainage plan and drainage report has been submitted with the site plan application. The report addressed detention and water quality requirements as outlined in the 2005 King County Surface Water Manual. 3. This site is located within the City's designated 100-year flood zone. Finish floors of the new buildings shall be a minimum of one foot above flood zone elevation. A FEMA Elevation Certificate will be required to be submitted at building pem1it. 4. If filling or grading on the site is below elevation 13.5, compensatory storage will be required to be provided. Additional information will be provided at site plan application. TRANSPORT A TJON 1. Installation of sidewalk and additional paving will be required fronting the site in Lind Ave SW. 2 Cedar River Corporate Park 01/19/2007 Page 3 of 3 2. A traffic study has been submitted and reviewed. Preliminary review indicates a center tum lane may be required to provide access to and from the site at the south entrance to the site. Additional information is required. 3. The applicant has submitted a request to waive installation of street improvements in SW 21" and SW 23'd required by code. MISCELLANEOUS I. Construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. 2. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 3. Rockeries or walls to be constructed greater than 4 feet in height will require a separate building permit and the following note shall be added to the civil plans: "Rockeries greater than 4 feet in height will require a separate building permit. A licensed engineer with geo-technical expertise must be retained for proposed rockeries greater than four feet in height. The engineer must monitor rockery construction and verify in writing that the rockery was constructed in general accordance with ARC standards and with his/her supplemental recommendations, in a professional manner and of competent and suitable material. Written verification by the engineer must be provided to the City of Renton public works inspector prior to approval of an occupancy permit or plat approval for the project." PLAN REVIEW -GENERAL 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 3. Separate permits and fees for side sewers, water meters, landscape irrigation meters, and any backtlow devices will be required. 4. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate and application fee shall be submitted at the sixth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use, but prior to preparing a check, it is recommended to call 425-430-7266 for a fee estimate as generated by the permit system. 5. Applicant shall be responsible for securing easements for public utilities. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1. Traffic mitigation fees of $74,925.00 are owing. See mitigation fee sheet. Fee is based on 999 trips x $75.00 2. Erosion control shall comply with Depa1iment of Ecology's current edition of the Stormwater Management Manual 3. Staff will recommend a SEPA condition that the project comply with the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual to meet both detention (Conservation Flow control -a.k.a. Level 2) and water quality improvements. cc: Kayren Kittrick 3 City __ 1enton Department of Planning I Building I PL~ c Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 19, 2007 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-172, SA-H, ECF -~T('YO~R.,~~v.E· D DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 5, 2007 M ,-,-V I APPLICANT: Tarraaon, LLC PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Dina I A Ii.I 11 ,U • , ,, , !· ..,,.,, • U V (..· PROJECT TITLE: Cedar River Coroorate Park PLAN REVIEW: Jan Illian SITE AREA: 539,272 sauare feet BUILDING AREA lnross): 143,307 sauare te~UILDING DIVISION LOCATION: E of Lind Ave SW & S of SW 19th St WORK ORDER NO: 77706 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The applicant is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval and Environmental Review for the construction of four office/retail/light industrial buildings totalling 143,307 square feet in area on a 539,272 square foot (12-4 acre) site located within the Light Industrial (IL) zoning designation and within the Employment Area -Valley overlay. Parking would be provided within a surface parking lot around the perimeter of the site. Access to the project site would be provided via two commercial driveway entrances off of Lind Avenue SW. A Category 2 wetland is located along the northern property line and a Category 3 wetland is located along the southern and eastern property lines. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics Water Uaht!Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transnnrration Environmental Health Public Services Energy! Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this app:Ca = ;rticular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additio information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature ~f Date APPLICATION FOR CITY OF RENTON RIGHT OF WAY USE -DEFERRALS -WAIVERS -VARIANCES -FEE IN LIEU 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 ( 425) 430-7204 PROJECT NAME, C :tdac A , ver Cor £xrd :k.. Pal' k:.< SITEADDRESS: asoo Bleck of L\;nc/ :Ave 5\JJ LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: Include King County Assessors Parcel No:----------------------- APPLICANT: \:1Ctp~ Y'\Q..6_)\<@ o( \erraacnhoNEa()L?-aa3-q{£f) CELL: _______ _ nusINEss ADDREss, I OdO --;Jrd {!.\J e Burle · 3a CXJ, Sea'::1±1 e q 9 Io 9 Zip Code ATTACH A SEPARATE LETTER WITH TIDS APPLICATION STA TING IN DETAIL: 1. The request 2. Applicable City Code 3. Items and quantities involved 4. Justification for request 5. Amount of time requested 6. Provide vicinity map Attach a 1 = 100 drawing of your site. Mail or drop off the completed application and map to: CITY OF RENTON Development Services Division Mike Dotson, Coordinator I 055 -S. Grady Way 6th Floor Renton, WA 98058 425-430-7304 Completed applications will be reviewed and a written detennination issued approximately 3-4 weeks from date of receipt of application. You will be contacted if application is incomplete or if additional infonnation is required. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE: ____________ DATE: t/11/d f2 OFFICE USE ONLY OFFICE USE ONLY DEFERRAL ( ) New ( ) Extension Offsite ------------- Onsite ____________ _ OFFICE USE ONLY OFFICE USE ONLY VARIANCE ( ) New ( ) Extension ( ) Underground ( ) Slope Grades ( ) Driveway ( ) Noise EXCESS RfW ( ) FEE IN LIEU ( ) WAIVER ti-. H:\File Sys\BPW. Board of Public Works\APPLICATJON\BPW2007.doc ~IJ~a~n~111;ia;n:-:;:27:6;:(:o~o:1:;;.e1:;:df::::::::::::::::-~.====·~,-----·-=-------------:pe:"'.a"'.'.'ge--:,1 I ~ January 19, 2007 Jan Illian Plan Review and Engineering Specialist City of Renton Renton City Hall -6th Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re: Cedar River Corporate Park Request £or Waiver of Street Impro,,ements on SW 21 11 and SW 23'11 Streets Dear Jan, n TARRAGON This letter is a requested for a waiver of street improvements (sidewalk, curb, and gutter) on SW 215' and SW 23.-d Streets adjacent to our project, per City of Renton Municipal Code -Section 4, Renton Development Regulations -Chapter 9, Waiver Procedures -Section 4.9.250C. Currently, SW 21st {1,070 LF) and SW 23'cl (879 LF) Streets are unimproved right of ways (with no future City of Renton plans of improvement) and are classifie class 2 & 3 wetlands. Please call with any questions you may have. T cc: Paul McCormick~AHBL Jim Carleton -AHBL 1000 Second Ave., Suite 3200 Seattle, WA 9a HM 206-233-9600 f• 206-233-0260 ! \'/\'/'//, i,1 , ::!it'I) ;Ql\1 .. • w '!'' '' ,., .. " "' ' ' >:1 <:( ,, ,, ,'I. '' 1·1 '' I\· '' Oil Z'' '' '' ,, '< '' ' ' _J ss .... ~ .. ii.,~ If (i) •·•vc 5 '"' .. A°,>\'1:1< ,2, '<)U"" .........vlT· ·= · ........... ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, ,;, ,.:ro i('"'" ~t 0 fEDAR RIVER CORPORATE PARK , SW 1/4, SECTION 19, "towNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, J.M. CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON I i i l j i ff SW 21 ST S If REE T """'"'"""'"'~""' I GRAPHIC SCALE WITH A 2 FOOT O~ANG f\{RY'M-l[R[ TO " AO.,,E'JE: A 20 FOOT OEPlli "• ''" • " "' ,oo -ti I . "'-'-I 11111 .. I I ; I ~ SIO[WAU(S HA\f BffM D£SIGNEO To MEET ~ 11 I ANO EXCEED A[l,\ MIHIMUI,! Cllll:£U,\{S IN ~ I~~ I II • • • • • • • • · · ___..,... AOOfJJOO TO ll-1[ 2 FOOT O'offiHANG WETL •1t• • 't' · --·.' · · · ·..;___·.·.· ·-.~' .. ••· · ·_ • ·•· ' ~CATE Y2) Jn,'~ETI / \' ~:.~-__ :·· . 1. //, --~~--,C:·,--c·.;rc...;_c::_1~----~~~~-_j~·.;::._:·:=:_'"_··---~\$~ ir,, -~:.,_,_: ,_::~__:._-~--~ -;:-,,.'----_ --~=-~ .-_ -~~ -··--=-c-~-. --------r ~·-~"'~l-=-ccc"------<'-1/\ , , I' ~.J;,' BLDG B -l!!!!..29,940 S.F. 312.o' ii ,~=.,_1rr~ c-c.-': ': ~---~?':0 '0 '.-J ~ IH~SII / R[OllNG. J FNCLOSURf" AREA ~-'-', ~ ffiL'CK 10AOING AR(A, AI.L GflOUN~ Ll \'EL, ~O 00"5 ~"i:'.i """~ b JO.o' .· ,L ;. _;J_s~ b • = BLDG D 44,580 S. ' . ~, ~')1~~,t, ! :.' '~ANCWCIIF'P£D POl!l<l'1G' ,,/' U' 't-'{---c--"(ii)--- ~ ffin.m om BIJIDIHG WAS I I I l (XTRUOEO CURB, ""'" BLDG A -J5.0f/ S.F EI..OG 8 -29,NO SS. lll.OG C -JJ.140 s.r. BlDG O -4(.580 Sr 10141. -aJ.307 S.F """"""'"' 14J . .107h41.liJ-261SX BLOG COl'(:1~GE Irl'L«.....C.Of'IS.TfilKI!llli · V 8 eM!lfil!li. MM.LIID WE ANIIC1PAJT DIM TlltS[ SP[CULAnVE AUILOINGS 'i'tl VARY 01.lR m•E Lill'IIFFl'i Jllt PFLATIONSHIP IY CfFlU ro '/IAROl(JUSE USL INITIALLY ~'E PR[UICI THAT IIIF ~MiO COULO DE AROUNU 50% omu TO 50% WARfrlOOSE:. BECAUSE WE HAVE DESIGNED 11,{ BUILDINGS ANO SITE TO llE PE0ES1R1.e.N fR!(NDLY, W£ HAl'E CREATED AN OPPORlUNIIY FOR AM INCRfASC IN cmcr USE:. Jl,J( SHI .I.LLO~ FOR 11--lE OOILOINGS TO !:lE CONNECTED WITH LARC£R THAN REQUIRED SIIJEWAU<S. TH( 81.IILOINGS HAVE AOOlnOtlAL STCREJRONI GlA21NG TO Id.LOW FOR Tl11S Of'TICE USE:. 'II[ ESTIMATE l!1AJ TI,(RE COJLO BE APPROXIMAlELY 75% OffiCf AS A RE'SUl.1 Cf" Tl1ES£ DESIGN ELDmns TOTA[ BLDG HJ,J07 s.r. 75% CHIC£ 107,480/!000~107.48 -,J,,J2J MIM, X4.5~484 MAX STAI.LS 25% WAREHOOSf JS.BU/1,500"2( MIN STALLS TOTAL SIJ\llS -1,m,1 .. J47. MA): .. soa. PRO~OED~i!Jl:I "'()A STAI.LS•9 11£1UNO «'b'Q RllfffR n:IBfM· WfllmD 'B" -A PCRTION Of M-llrn IS ON OOR PROPERtY -26.114 S.F (0.61 ACRE) WfllANO ll' 25 fOOT El.HER -A PORTIOtl OF VfilCH IS ON OUR PRCf'ERTY • .J6.09J S.F (0.BJ ACRE) WETUNO .,.. 50 FOOT BUFfER -A POOTIO~ OF \!MICH IS ON OOR PR()P£Rfl' -IS.H6 s.r (O.:lS ACRE). NO f'AfH OF WETLAAO .,.. IS ~ CXJR PROPERTY l9PRN(] BROOK CREEK ~ 100' SETBACK FROM _ / _ ~W~TEA _MAR~ _ • ' • ' ' ' . ' ,, = ~--~=~-==-:L~---~~~_.::._ = -=·,-= .::.._ Na9"5i}"-~~~:~·==...:&.L£ · -_-_·11m;-~~ im·.os-.----,~,~~~~-_c-=:cc-=---cc.~-=~~,:-~ ------· ---------·-------·---: - -------• ----~-.b.a.--'-~ ...,ff, TlirSUME FOU.50>Ci> 100' ,0011< OF -------~ -~ HISTING LANOSCAl'I=: Ill£ ,<ClAl>! CHE OF 1HE l~" SVrTI:~ MIU NORTH LJII[ ~1-w•fE~ ..... ~ -~ AREAS. TrPtCAL. ~ ,: W• ---ra,on:a3, -,_-·"··:· BROOI,; SIREAM DUE "" ' .r-=:,, =-= ..•• ~-~~ ~--~--m·•-~- TACOMA SEATTLE 2215 Nc1t! 3011 S1r911, SUlll lOO, Tecoma, WA 91M03 "'"""" ~ 1200Sldi "Ylll'W, &At 1820,&.tli,, W!\ 111110! 20lt.217.20 TB. Prai'!<=t Tjlll' Cedar River Corporate Park c« .. nt: Tarragon • Cedar River Corp. Park L.L.C. 1000 2,,,:1 A.-e. Suil~ J200 5e<itlle. WA. 981CH- l,lurphy WcCulough 206-2J3-%00 .,&'L.!'!Q. 200200.00 l,sue Set & Date Issued For Site Plan Review 12/15/06 -·~ L~'1t'"*"="~":. 1---......... ..... -~--.......... __ _ ~5~1fi:. & _______ _ & ______ ~ /},. ______ ~ ,1, ______ _ ~ .s...~ Qa,.19ned bv JKC S~Ht No Site Plan ~ RNS 80.1 Check"d by· "" o! Sh<iets: • , .. .-.r. Ti i ' I J l ' I I • i I I Project Name: Project Address: Contact Person: Permit Number: Project Description: Land Use Type: 0 Residential 0 Retail , 0 Non-retail Calculation: ~qc; J\D, c1c\cl ¥ $75.~v Cia:tW-~,Kv Luf{cv(l.,\g, \'c,vlJ,., kV\J /Su:' ii\'-"' s< Method of Calculation: .;# 7L\ u __ .:........: _____ _ 0 ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition ,EtTraffic Study 0 Other '-.->-, " .JI v ) / ,v1.., , Transportation Mitigation Fee: Calculated by: _£,!.;. 1..:1· ii~\...,lb)......,,.,~'""1--------Date: I I I Date of Payment: Cit. 1enton Department of Planning I Building IP Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET I APPLICATION NO: LUA06-172, SA-H, ECF APPLICANT: Tarraaon, LLC PROJECT TITLE: Cedar River Corporate Park SITE AREA: 539,272 square feet LOCATION: E of Lind Ave SW & S of SW 19th St COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 19, 2007 DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 5, 2007 PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Dinn PLAN REVIEW: Jan Illian BUILDING AREA 1nrossl: 143,307 snuare feet WORK ORDER NO: 77706 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval and Environmental Review for the construction of four office/retail/light industrial buildings totalling 143,307 square feet in area on a 539,272 square foot (12.4 acre) site located within the Light Industrial (IL) zoning designation and within the Employment Area -Valley overtay. Parking would be provided within a surface parking lot around the perimeter of the site. Access to the project site would be provided via two commercial driveway entrances off of Lind Avenue SW. A Category 2 wetland is located along the northern property line and a Category 3 wetland is located along the southern and eastern property lines. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable Mo,e Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics Water Linht!Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transnnr1ation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date -' City o: 'Renton Department of Planning I Building IP, , Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 19, 2007 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-172, SA-H, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 5, 2007A EC E fvue t) APPLICANT: Tarraaan. LLC PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Dina IA11 .. _ -- PROJECT TITLE: Cedar River Coroorate Park PLAN REVIEW: Jan Illian SITE AREA: 539,272 sauare feet BUILDING AREA lnross\: 143,307 sau~~l~,Pel{'JG DIVISION LOCATION: E of Lind Ave SW & S of SW 19'" St I WORK ORDER NO: 77706 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval and Environmental Review for the construction of four office/retail/light industrial buildings totalling 143,307 square feet in area on a 539,272 square foot (12.4 acre) site located within the Light Industrial (IL) zoning designation and within the Employment Area -Valley over1ay. Parking would be provided within a surface parking lot around the perimeter of the site. Access to the project site would be provided via two commercial driveway entrances off of Lind Avenue SW. A Category 2 wetland is located along the northern property line and a Category 3 wetland is located along the southern and eastern property lines. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable Mora Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housino Air Aesthetics Water L1aht/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Ufifities Animals Transnorration ~ Environmental Health Public Services Energy! Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POL/CY-RELATED COMMENTS \,Jl'lvU..,~ /ZU .A/YYLJA:<:,,-Z_/S 13 ~h C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ~1r~,(<4.tJca4d,,;:__ ) Signature Director or AUOri~presentative Date DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MITIGATION ITEMS: FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM January 8, 2007 Jill Ding, Associate Planner James Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal ~ Jt Cedar River Corporate Park, 2000 Lind Ave SW 1. A fire mitigation fee of$74,519.64 is required based on $.52 per square foot of the building square footage. FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS: I. The preliminary fire flow is 5000 GPM for Building D, 4750 GPM for Building C and 4000 GPM for Building A. One hydrant is required within 150 feet of each structure and four additional hydrants are required within 300 feet Buildings A and C and three for Buildings B and D. A 12 inch looped water main is required to handle the increased fire flow demands. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of the required sprinkler and fire alarm systems. 3. Fire department access roadways are required to within 150 feet of all portions of the building exterior. Roadways are a minimum 20 feet in width with a turning radius of 45 feet outside and 25 feet inside. 4. Fire Department dead end access roadways over 150 feet in length are required to have an approved turnaround. 5. Provide a list of flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are used or stored on site. 6. A site plan for Pre-Fire planning is required to be submitted for your project. This shall be submitted prior to occupancy, in one of the attached formats. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. i: \cedarri vercorpparkerc .doc I PRE-FIRE PLANNING I RENTON FIRE DEPARTMENT In an effort to streamline our pre-fire process, we are requesting that you submit a site plan of your construction project in one of the following formats which we can then convert to VISIO.vsd. This is required to be submitted prior to occupancy. ABC Flowcharter.afJ ABC Flowchartcr.af2 Adobe Illustrator File.ai AutoCad Drawing.dwg AutoCad Drawing.dgn Computer Graphics Mctafile.cgm Corel Clinart Format.cmx Corel DRAW! Drawing File Format.edr Corel Flow.cfl Encansulated Postscript File.cps Enhanced Metafile.emf IGES Drawing File Format.igs Graphics Interchange Format.gif Macintosh PICT Fom1at.nct Micrografx Designer Ver 3.1.drw Micrografx Designer Ver 6.0.dsf Microstation Drawing.dgn Portable Network Graphics Fomrnt.pnf Postscrint File.ps Tag Image File Fomrnt.tif Text.txt Text.csv VISIO.vsd Windows Bitmap.bmp Windows Bitmap.dib Windows Metafile.wmf Zsoft PC Paintbrush Bitmap.pcx .; Cit: 1enton Department of Planning I Building IP Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 19, 2007 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-172, SA-H, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 5, 2007 APPLICANT: Tarraaan, LLC PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Dind PROJECT TITLE: Cedar River Coroorate Park PLAN REVIEW: Jan Illian .!li~ _ r ... __ - SITE AREA: 539,272 sauare feet BUILDING AREA lnross): 143,307 sauare feet LOCATION: E of Lind Ave SW & S of SW 19~ St I WORK ORDER NO: 77706 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval and Environmental Review_tor .\he construction of four office/retail/light industrial buildings totalling 143,307 square feet in area on a 539,272 square foot (12.4 acre) site located within the Light Industrial (IL) zoning designation and within the Employment Area -Valley overlay. Parking would be provided within a surface parking lot around the perimeter of the site. Access to the project site would be provided via two commercial driveway entrances off of Lind Avenue SW. A Category 2 wetland is located along the northern property line and a Category 3 wetland is located along the southern and eastern property lines. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable Mo,e Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housin_q Air Aesthetics Water Liaht!Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Trans rtation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feer B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS /J.4 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ~·~ JJcr t ') /' (.1 pttJt c,1! ,, ii:tJ-J. We have reviewed hfa application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas wher fdditi nal information ·" eded to properly assess this proposaf. Date NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE, LAND USE NUMBER: LUA06-172 SA H_ EC;; PROJECT NAME: CeUdr R,,er Corpma:e -'ark PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant ,s recues:1ng Hean~g Examiner s,:e ~1~, an,1 Env,ronmental Review for the conslrur.t,on or four off,celfeta1lil1ght 1ndustriJI bu ld1ngs totalling 14'.l 307 ,,1u~·~ n ~reJ Qf1 a 539,272 squa•e foot 112 4 acre/ site located w,th,n '.h<a Light lndi,st·1al (IL) zon,ng j&signalic,,· ~·,,, ·1,1'.t in Ille Empk)yment Area • Valle; c,·erlay Pa11<,ng would be provided wr\h1n a surface park,ng le: around the c,~, ."'et"· ·,I toe ~,te_ Access to the pro1ect s,:e w0uld tie provided v,a tNO commerc,~I Cr:veway ertrarces cf! of L1rd A,enu~ S.:1 r... (Aego') 2 wettand ,s locate-:: along :he nor1he'n prooer1y line and a Catego,y 3 wetland ,s IOCJlc::f alQfl{l lhe sc,c.1',~''' "''" ~~slwn prope<ty lines PA:OJECT LOCATION: East of Lino A•enue SW an::I Soulh of SW I~" Slreel OPTIONAL OETER.MINA TION OF NON·SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS.M). As t~~ Lead Agenc',' '."c S:1:1 J' Pr,·,,~n nas determinec tr,at sigr,fica;: e~wonmer,tal ,n-,pac:s are unl1Kely tc rnsult 'rorri lhe proposed prc:c,: --G,c'0re as pe<m,Ued under lhe RCW 4J 21C 110. the City of Renton ,s us,rg the Optional DNS·M proc<ass to g1"J~ "' ce :Ci:~ CNS M ,s likely 10 be ,ssLed Comirenl periods for t'1e pro,ec: and t,e oropose:I DNS-M are 1nte91dt~O 1r1'·· , p<,riod. There ,.,11 oe nr; corc,rnert ~r1od follawmg ·.h<a issuance ct !he Threshold Dele,m,nat,or Mitigated (DNS-M:, A 14.oay app<aal pe11od w,1, follow !h<a issuance of the CNS-M PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: Decembe• 27 200E NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: January 5 2007 APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PER.SON: Jim Carl'itton, AHBL, Inc.; Tel: (2531383-2422; Eml: Jcar1eton@ahb\.com Penni~IRev;ew Roquuted Other Permits which may be "'quired: Requested Studies: Location whare application may be reviewed· PUBLIC HEARING· CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zoning/Land Use: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project· Environmental ($EPA) R'itview, HQaring E~amlner Site Pion approval Building, Utility construction and Fire Permits Wetland, Geotechnical, Drainage Reports and Traffic Analysis P!annlng/Bulldlng/Publlc Works Department, Development Ser111ces Division, Sixth Floor R.en!on City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way. R~nton. WA 96055 Pu;,1,r; he;,ripg ,, \en·a:w& gheduled •or March.i., 2007 beb,~ 1·,~ "'~' b Hearmg Exam1n&r ,~ Ren19n Cocnc,1 r11_arnbers Hearings t~,J';' ~: ~ :,, '~M the 7th floor of !he new Renton c,t·; Ha!I ,ccat,:,d at 1055 Soc th G·a,1, ,..',s·, ine sua1ect s,te is desigsated fmplo1ment Area Valley or, the ~,I)' ut_ ~~nt:,-, Comprehensive Land lJse Map and 1 ,ghl lncustrial (IL;, on 1'><= c,t1 s Zcnirg M ,o Environmental (SEP/1,1 Checklist Proposed Mitigation Measures: The followmg M1ligation ~1easu,es will 1,ke.y De 1mposecJ on lhe proposed pro1ect These reccmmended M1:1gat,on Meas~res address µrc1ect ,mpacts no\ covered by ex,st,ng codes and regulations as c,ted above T~e applicant 111,'I be reqwred 10 pay the app,aprie!e Tranwortahon Mrlige/ion Fee T.h& applicMI w,11 be rr,qwrnr/ ro pay the appropriat& Fire M,rigalron Feo TM µro1ect w1/I be reqw,etl !O comply wit~ !.~e mr;~/ w"enl s&ts,on o/ lne Oepa,1,nen/ M Ecology S!or•nwJter Mw•egement 'v/JnLJDI for ero~ron and sed1menl cont101. and The fJrOJect w111 be reqo,ired lo comply wi!!i /lie 2005 K1,ryq Coumy Swface 'Nater Ccs,gn .Va""al Comments on !ho above ~pplJcatfon must b& eubmilt'itd In writing to Jill Ding, Senior Plann'itr, D'itv&lopm'ltnt Services Division, 10S5 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on January 19, 2007. This matter is also lantillively schedulad lo, a public hearing on March 6, 2007, at 9:00 AM. Council Chambe•s Seventh Floor, Renton C,ty Hall 1055 South Grady Way Re~ton If ·;oJ are interested in attand,ng lhe h<aarirg, pleasn :onlact the Developmenl Services D1v1s1on !o e%ure tha1 lhe hearrng has nol been reschMcled at (425) 430-7282 If comments cannol be submitted 1n writmg by the date ,nd1cated above. ·;ou may still appear at the hearing anO presenl your comments on the prnpos;;,I before the Heanng Examiner. II yo~ ha·,e questions about lh1s pro~osal. or ,..,sh tc oe 'llade a par1y of record and receive add1t1onal ,r.forroet1on by mail. pl&ase contact tre pcoJect r-,anager Anpne who subrr,ts wntten commen~ will automat,cJl;y becon·,e a pa1y cf record and w,,1 oe nc11'1ecl of a~Y dee s.on on ll'JS proJect CONTACT PERSON: Jill K. Diog, Senior Planner; Tel (425) 430-7219; Eml: jding@ci.renton.wa.us PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION SITE i ·' If you would like 10 b!l made a party of record to recc111e further inrorrnat1on on th,s P'Oposed pro1ec:, complete Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation Tne proJect w,11 be suoiect to lhe c,tys SEPA ,~,d,r,ance R".IC.. ,-_I,~~:.> ,:.;·,:,:JI this form and return to City of RentoP, Development Planning. 1C55 So Grad~ Wat Renton WA 98055 Areas 4-4-030 Development Regulations. 4-6-C30 Dra1rage "'e'.l' .. 1~1~,,,. Jnj Name/File No Cedar River Corporate Park/LUA0€-172. SA·H ECF othP.r applicable codes <ind regulations as appropriate NAME MAILING ADDRESS TELEPHONE NO CERTIFICATION :\,'''""'"\''u I, SE.77+ &,eseJZ-, hereby certify that 3 copies of the ab3,.~~-~1,,~ were posted by me m _____2.___ conspicuous places or nearby the described ~·o.pA. ~~~\ ' ~ ,t O · If} ~".Ti'!'- / ~ ,~. -~ '/ -.. ·~ .,, DATE: /-;-OJ SIGNED:, ~ !';> · -§ § ~ '/. -; ~ (; l~= ~lft{1 ''il\..~ ,ffO- A TrEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Puhl1c, m and for the State of Washington r~~~•iP;..<,,~ 19-\';.,$.r,~E" ,,, ~ ;\\\\\~'t\~~~~ i'I~ OF P.5,_,,,, .. CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 5th day of January, 2007, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Acceptance Letter, NOA, Environmental Checklist, & PMT's documents. This information was sent to: Name Reoresentina Agencies Surrounding Property Owners -NOA only Howard Seelig Tarragon, LLC Jim Carleton (Signature of Sender): , ,&-~ --.Jt{( /, ,,. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) See Attached See Attached Owner Applicant Contact I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. ,,~,·~t~)1~1h11 11 .:: -1.. \, ·.:-.r:..~•n,,, ''1. Dated: 1-8 ·C:J Notary (Print): Q,,,1 1,., J., '/DD \-\c,%,,y-;c,~ My appointment expires: d, \<\ -1c Project Name: Cedar River Corporate Park Project Number: LUA06-172, SA-H, ECF template -affidavit of service by mailing f ftl -"~;;,n.,H Ii~ ~I. Dept. of Ecology • Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olvmoia, WA 98504-7703 AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Stewart Reinbold• Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept . c/o Department of Ecology Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer 3190 160" Ave SE 39015 -172"' Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98008 Auburn. WA 98092 . WSDOT Northwest Region • Duwamish Tribal Office• Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program • Attn: Ramin Pazooki 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172"' Avenue SE PO Box 330310 Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers• KC Wastewater Treatment Division * Office of Archaeology & Historic Seattle District Office Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation* Attn: SEPA Reviewer Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer PO Box C-3755 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98124 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 Jamey Taylor* Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: SEPA Section Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director Renton, WA 98055-1219 13020 SE 72"' Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Metro Transit Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Senior Environmental Planner Municipal Liason Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Gary Kriedt Joe Jainga 6300 Southcenter Blvd. 1201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01 W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities State Department of Ecology Real Estate Services NW Regional Office Title Examiner 3190 1601h Avenue SE 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application. • Also note, do not mail Jamey Taylor any of the notices she gets hers from the web. Only send her the ERC Determination paperwork. template -affidavit of service by mailing I I i 334040028501 621 COMPANY PO BOX 17387 FOUNTAIN HILLS AZ 85269 334040332507 HPTMI PROPERTIES TRUST C/0 MARRIOTI INTERNATIONAL 1 MARRIOTI DR # 52-93801 WASHINGTON DC 20058 334040332804 SHADY ACRES PROPERTIES LLC 19525 62ND AVES KENT WA 98032 302305908303 BEYOND PETROLEUM C/0 BP AMERICA INC PO BOX 5015 BUENA PARK CA 90622 334040333208 LARKSPUR HOSPITALITY CO LLC C/0 PROPERTY TAX DEPT #115 PO BOX 4900 SCOTISDALE AZ 85261 334040000609 SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS DEPT PT WA 08165 PO BOX 25025 GLENDALE CA 91201 219310010000 BIT HOLDINGS FIFTY-FIVE INC 2 HOPKINS PLAZA #804 BALTIMORE MD 21201 302305910101 OLYMPIC PIPELINE COMPANY C/0 BP AMERICA INC PO BOX 5015 BUENA PARK CA 90622 112. I • i77r .cqt;' UAvl· t7J,. City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME j) l--1 COH PA(N y ADDRESS: P.o. g CITY: ZIP: Be I le-vue.. TELEPHONE NUMBER: D APPLICANT (if other than owner) COMPANY (rl applicable): ADDRESS: )ODD S CITY: s TELEPHONE NUMBER ZIP: Zo&> Z "3? -/.,;, 00 CONTACT PERSON NAME· COMPANY (rl applicable) ADDRESS: 32.oo 'l-Z.15 n r+1r1 30-,.,,, Bf 6te 3o CITY ZIP: ,......,..... o..c:..v VY1a:. . L,vR '3&:t:o 3 TELEPHONE NUMBE~ AND E-MAIL ADDRESS 1 ('?c:; ~, 3:B 3-24 2-z._. JG2,£1e.w---@Q,.1-i01l ~ C.Ol'YJ PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Cedar R.iver 0m-f'ar/C_[ Lind ,'/vi PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE ,Z.000 13 /oc.,JC.... e,.f Llv,d. 14ve £L<..J Renton , /,.A...J,:\ q5 OS' r KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): EXISTING LAND USE(S) PROPOSED LAND USE(S): 14 EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP D_ESIGNATION: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applrcable): EXISTING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING (ii applrcable) NA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED -G- SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: -e-- PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable)· 0\... NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (rl applicable): I NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (ii applicable) --e-----~--------~- 12/05!06 10:16 FAI 253 274 4778 ., . [4: 003 ./ -·-----------·-----··_PROJECT_ !NFO~MAJIO!Ucontinuedl _________ ---···- 1Jut.1BER OF EX1S Ill-JG DWELLING UNITS (,i apphcaoic-:,. : l PROJECT '/~LUE :Jl &>, l:,00, ooo._= ·-··---=1 .---et-··---~--··---···········---. . . SQUA~RE F-OOTAGL: OF FSOP:JSt~D FlESfDENT1A ! IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY T'YPf_ OF 1 , BUILDINGS '.d apo,icabte): V\ jo._ --~-----·---.J ENVl.qONMFNTALLY CRITIC.t\L Af1[A, PLE.I\SE tr.,fCLUf:E SQUARE FOOT ASE OF EXISTING PES:DENTIA: BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (,i ap,,ficable): n jc;.._. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-AES!DE~i"I iAc i I BUILDINGS !It applicabl?i: I 4 3 B Q.1: 0 f .. __ .J SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXIS1'1NG ~-RESIDEN' •;.:_ \ I BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (11 applioab!e): ·B-~ NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-AESIDE~ITIAL BUlcD"',Gc• '' I appli;at,10): [ 43, · 307 ________ J NUt.'BEA OF EMPLOYEES TO BE [MPLOYED BY i>-i[ i NEW PROJECT (ii apphcable): u...g~z,'~ o.;t--~.:' ____ J SQUARE F00-::-1:\GE {i1 3.p;Jlicablr.)· 0 f,QlJ1FER PR:JTECTION AREA ONE Ll AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO D FLOOD HAZ~RD AlllcA C! GEOL.QG!C HAZ.ARD Q HABITAT CONSERVATION D SHORELINE STREAMS ANcJ LAKES I ;< WETL,,NOS ·--- LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY ·---· sq.!t. -·-·--·----sq. fl. sq. ft. sq. ft. (Attach legal description on SC£!'!1tu sheet with the following Information Included) I SITUATE IN THE -~~\A) __ QUARTc'R CF Sf:CTION l:L TOWNSHIP ~.2 RANGE_5_. IN THE CITY OF RENTON KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF ft.PPLICATION & FEES j List al! land use applications being applied fer· 1. __ 5,E:. e ;:-... . ____ ,::z.c., 3 ' ·+· / , 2. __ s,. c...~Pl&n Revic:.»S" 20,;0 4. I ; Staff will calculate applicable fees and pos!age: $_. ?1 vcJO. I AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP .1 Dec 19 06 06:!0p SEELIG FAMILY PROPERTIES 425 454 0885 p. 1 621 c:ompany Seelig Family Properties 19 December 2006 Laureen Nicolay City of Renton Fax 425-430-723 l Dear Ms. Nicolay: This letter will confirm that my brother, Howard L. Seelig, and I arc the partners of the general partnership, 621 Company. Sincerely, /~ c:;:~""" Martin A. Seelig, Partner (425) 454-0885 Tel (425) 451-8203 Fax marlin@seeligpropertie s. com Street Address: 1309 -114th SE, Suite 107 Bellevue, WA 98009 DATE: TO: FROM: CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM September 11, 2006 Jill Ding, Senior Planner Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector SUBJECT: Lind Avenue Business Park 1. The preliminary fire flow is 3,500 gpm, one hydrant is required within 150 feet of each structure and three additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of each structure. It appears that adequate fire flow is available in this area. A new, looped 10-inch minimum size water main is required to be installed on site. All existing fire hydrants are required to be retrofitted with 5-inch storz quick connect fittings if not already equipped with them. 2. Fire sprinkler systems are required in all buildings. All sprinkler systems are required to be monitored by an approved service. 3. Fire Department access roadways appear adequate. Roadways are required to meet minimum 25-foot inside and 45-foot outside turning radius with minimum 20-foot width. 4. Fire mitigation fees are charged for all new commercial construction at the rate of $0.52 per square foot. Fees are paid at time of building permit issuance. Total fees for this project of 135,840 square feet would be $70,636.80. TO: FROM: DATE: Jill Ding Jan Illian September 19, 2006 CIT\' OF REI\TON MEMO UTILITY PLAN REVIEW SUB.TECT: PREAPPLJCATON REVIEW CO\fMENTS LIJ\1) A VE BUSINESS PARK PREAPP NO. 06-140 2000 Block of Lind Ave SW NOTE ON PRELIMINARY REVIEW COMi\lE:\TS CONTAINED IN TIDS REPORT: The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers (e.g. Hearing Examiner, Boards of Adjustment, Board of Public \Vorks and City Council). Review comments may also need to be re,ised based on site planning and other design changes required by the City or made by the applicant. WATER I. Water System Development Charges (SDC) of $0.273 per square foot of gross site area will apply. Fees are payable at the time the utility permit 1s issued. 2. There is an existing 24 · inch water main in Lind Ave SW. See water drawing 27-0192. 3. Preliminary fire flow required 1s 3,500 gpm. A \'a1lable dcrated fire flow in the area is 5,500 gpm. Pressure available is approximately 78 psi 4. All new construction must have fire hydrants capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 gpm. A primary hydrant is required within 150 feet from the buildings and three additional hydrants ,vill be required be within 300 feet of the nearest corner of each building. 5. There are fire hydrants in Lind Ave SW that may be counted towards the fire protection of this project, but are subject to verification for being withm the requ1Ted distance. 6. Existing hydrants counted as fire protection will be required to be retrofitted with a quick disconnect Storz fitting if not already in place. 7. A looped 10-inch water main around the buildings will be required. Applicant will also be required to tie into an existing 8-inch water main to the east. Hydrants will be required to be installed. 8. The proposed project is located in the 196 water pressure zone and is outside an Aquifer Protection Zone. 9. If proposed bmldings exceed 30 feet in height. a backtlow device will be required to be installed on the domestic water meter. Lind Ave Business Park 06 Page 2 of 3 I 0. Fire spnnkler system will be reqmred by the fire department. A separate no-fee utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation of the double detector check valve assembly for fire spnnkler line. All devices installed shall be per the latest Department of Health "Approved List" of Backflow Prevention Devices. Location of device shall be shown on the civil plans and shall show note: "Separate plans and utility permit for DDCVA installation for Fire Sprinkler System will be required". DDCV A installations outside the buildmg shall be m accordance with the City of Renton Standards. For DDCV A installations proposed to be installed inside the buildmg, applicant shall submit a copy of the mechanical plan showing the location and installation of the backflow assembly inside the mechanical room. Installation shall be in accordance with the City ofRenton's requirements. DDCYA shall be installed immediately after the pipe has passed through the building floor slab. Installation of devices shall be in the horizontal position only. 11. Landscape irrigation systems will require a separate meter and backflow device. A plumbing permit will be required SANITARY SEWER I. Sanitary Sewer System Development Charges (SDC) of $0.142 per square foot of gross site area will apply. Fees are payable at the time the utility permit is issued. 2. There is an 8-inch sewer main in Lind Ave SW. 3. Extension of an 8-inch sewer main on site will be required. 4. If finished floor elevation is below 25 feet, a "tideflex" or similar backflow device will be required to be installed on the side sewer. 5. Side sewer (s) shall have a minimum of 2% slope. 6. If food preparation facilities (kitchen, restaurant) are proposed, a grease trap or grease interceptor will be required. A separate plumbing permit is required. SURFACE WATER I. There are existing storm drainage facilities in Lind Ave SW. 2. A preliminary drainage plan and drainage report will be required with the site plan application. The report shall address detention and water quality requirements as outlined in the 1990 King County Surface Water Manual. All core and any special requirements shall be contained in the report. If preliminary calculations show detention will be required under the 1990 King County Surface Water Manual, staff will recommend a SEPA condition that the project comply with the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual to meet both detention (Conservation Flow control -a.k.a. Level 2) and water quality improvements. 3. The Surface Water SDC is assessed based on the total new impervious surface square footage as reflected in the final design. The charge is determined by multiplying the gross square footage by $0.265. SDC fees are payable at the time the utility permit is issued. 4. Separate structural plans will be required to be submitted for review and approval under a building permit for any proposed underground vaults for water quality and detention. Special inspection from the building department will be required. 5. This site is located within the City's designated 100-year flood zone. Finish floor of the new building shall be a minimum of one foot above flood zone elevation. A FEMA Elevation Certificate will be required to be submitted at building permit. A certificate has been provided. Lind Ave Business ParK 06 Page3of3 6. If filling or grading on the site is belcm· eln·at1on 13.5, compensatory storage will be required to be provided. Additional mformation will be pro\"1dcd at site plan application. 7. Erosion control shall comply with the Dept. of Ecology·s 2005 Stormwater Manual. TRANSPORTATION/STREET 1. Half street improvements including, but not limited to paving, sidewalks, curb & gutter, storm drain, street signs and streetlights arc required front mg the site in Lind Ave NE if not already in place. 2. A traffic mitigation fee of $75 per additional generated daily trip shall be assessed as determined by the ITE trip generation manual. 3. All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Under Grounding Ordinance. If three or more poles are required to be moved by the development design, all existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground. GENERAL COMMENTS I. All construction utility permits for utilities. dramage and street improvements will reqnire separate plan submittals. All utility plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. Plans shall be prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. When the utility plans are complete, please submit three (3) copies of the drawings, two (2) copies of the drainage report, permit application and an 1tem1zed cost of construction estimate and application fee at the counter on the sixth floor. A fee worksheet is attached for your use, but prior to preparing a check, it is recommended to call 425-430-7266 for a fee csl!mate as generated by the permit system. 3. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over SI 00,000 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half the fee must be paid upon application. 4. Any proposed rockeries or retaining walls greater than 4 feet in height will be require a separate building pennit and will require special inspection. 5. Separate permits and fees for water meters. side sewers, irrigation meters and all backflow devices are required. CC Kayren Kiltrick CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: September 21, 2006 TO: Pre-Application File No. 05-140 FROM: Jill K. Ding, Senior Planner x 7219 SUBJECT: Lind Avenue Business Park (2"d Meeting) General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above- referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator, Development Services Director, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for $50, plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall. Development Regulations are also available for review at no charge in the office of the City Clerk on the 7th floor, at Development Services on the 5th floor and at the Renton Library. Project Proposal: The proposal is to construct approximately 136,000 square feet of retail business space in four separate buildings. Building A would be 38,610 square feet, Building B would be 30,600 square feet, Building C would be 28,400 square feet, and Building D would be 38,230 square feet. The subject site is located at the southeastern corner of the intersection of Lind Avenue SW and SW 21" Street (parcel ID 334040-0285) within the Light industrial (IL) zoning designation and totals 539,272 square feet in area. A surface parking lot with approximately 369 spaces is proposed around the perimeter of the proposed buildings. Access to the subject site is proposed via two commercial driveways onto Lind Avenue SW. A Category 2 wetland with a required 50-foot buffer area is located along the northern property line. A Category 3 wetland with a required 25-foot buffer is located along the eastern and southern property line. Zoning: The subject site is designated Light Industrial (IL) on the City's Zoning Map. The intent of the IL zone is to provide areas for low-intensity manufacturing, industrial services, distribution, storage, and technical schools. Uses allowed in this zone are generally contained within buildings. Material and/or equipment used in production are not stored outside. Activities in this zone do not generate external emissions such as smoke, odor, noise, vibrations, or other nuisances outside the building. Compatible uses that directly serve the needs of other uses in the zone are also allowed. In addition, the subject site is located within the Employment Area Valley Overlay. Primary retail uses are permitted within the Employment Area Valley. Pre05-140 (IL Lind Av!:' Business Park 2nd Mtg) doc Development Standards: The proposal's compliance with the IL zone development standards and the parking regulations is addressed below: Minimum Lot Size. Width, and Depth -The IL zoning designation has a minimum lot size requirement of 35,000 feet. There are no minimum width and depth requirements. As proposed, the project would comply with the minimum lot size, width, and depth requirements. Lot Coverage -The maximum building lot coverage permitted in the IL zone is 65% of the total lot area. The pre-application materials indicate that the proposed buildings would have a total building footprint of 136,000 square feet. The proposal for four buildings, which would have a total of 136,000 square feet of building footprint. results in a lot coverage of 25% (136,000 square feet/ 539,272 square feet= 25%), which complies with the building lot coverage requirements for the IL zone. Setbacks -The minimum required front yard and side yard along a street setbacks in the IL zone are 15 feet. No interior side or rear yard setbacks are required unless the site abuts a residential zone. The site does not abut a residential zone, therefore no side or rear yard setbacks are required. As proposed, the new office/warehouse structures would comply with all the required setbacks for the IL zone. Landscaping -RMC section 4-2-130A requires that except for critical areas, all portions of the site not covered by structures, required parking, access, circulation or service areas shall be maintained as permeable areas and improved with native, drought-resistant vegetative cover. In addition, the minimum amount of landscaping required along the site's non-principal arterial streets is 10% of the lot depth or 15 feet, whichever is less, but in no case shall the landscaped area be less than 1 O feet. In addition, the Parking Regulations, RMC section 4-4-0SOF.7, require that any landscaping within a parking area be a minimum of 5 feet in width. For parking lots with 100 or more stalls, the minimum amount of landscaping within the parking lot is 35 square feet per parking space. The proposal for 369 parking stalls would require 12,915 square feet of landscaping within the parking area. Street trees shall be placed at the average minimum rate of one tree every 30 lineal feet of street frontage. In addition to the required street trees, an additional tree for every 6 parking spaces is required. Shrubs shall be planted at the rate of 5 per 100 square feet of landscape area, up to 50% of the shrubs may be deciduous. Groundcover shall be planted in sufficient quantities to provide at least 90% coverage of the planting area within 3 years of installation. Each parking space must be within 50 feet of a landscaped area. All landscaped areas shall be irrigated or consist of drought resistant plants. A landscape plan prepared by a qualified professional in compliance with the requirements found in RMC 4-8-1200.12 shall be submitted at the time of formal land use application. Height -The IL zone allows a maximum building height of 50 feet, provided that a building height in excess of 50 feet may be permitted subject to the approval of an Administrative Conditional Use Permit. No elevations of the proposed structure were submitted with the pre-application materials, therefore staff was unable to determine if the proposed structures would comply with the building height requirements. Building elevations are required with at the time of formal land use application. Screening/Refuse and Recyclable Deposit Areas -Screening must be provided for all surface-mounted and roof top utility and mechanical equipment. In addition, garbage dumpsters and recyclable areas must be screened pursuant to RMC section 4-4-090. C. 7. Approval of the proposed locations of dumpster areas by Rainier Waste Management is PreOS-140 (IL Lind Ave Business Park 2nd Mtg).doc recommended prior to the submittal of the formal land use application. The site plan application will need to include elevations and details for the proposed methods of screening. For retail developments, a minimum of 5 square feet per every 1,000 square feet of building gross floor area shall be provided for recyclable deposit areas and a minimum of 10 square feet per every 1,000 square feet of building gross floor area shall be provided for refuse deposit areas. Based on the proposal for 136,000 square feet of retail area, a minimum of 680 square feet of recyclable deposit area and 1,360 square feet of refuse deposit areas shall be provided on the project site. Access/Parking -Access to the site is proposed via two commercial driveways onto Lind Avenue SW The proposal is required to accommodate a minimum number of off street parking spaces for the proposed use. The maximum number of spaces permitted for a retail use is 0.4 spaces per 100 square feet of net floor area. Based on the total gross floor area of 136,000 square feet submitted, a maximum of 544 spaces would be permitted. The proposal for 369 parking spaces would comply with this requirement. The net floor area (as defined in RMC 4-11-070) in addition to the gross floor area must be submitted at the time of formal land use application. Standard parking spaces (Surface/Private Garage/Private Carport) must comply with the following minimum dimensions for standard and compact stalls: • Standard stalls must have a minimum length of 20 feet and a minimum width of 9 feet; and • Compact stalls must have a minimum length of 16 feet and a minimum width of 8 Y, feet. Compact parking spaces are not allowed to exceed 30% of the total parking provided for standard parking areas. In addition, the applicant needs to provide a minimum aisle width of 24 feet between the parking spaces (RMC 4-4-080.F.9). For all buildings constructed, which require deliveries to or shipments from, adequate loading space shall be provided. Loading spaces shall be provided in addition to required parking areas. Adequate loading space shall be identified on the site plan and submitted at the time of formal land use application. Buildings which utilize dock-high loading doors shall provide a minimum one hundred feet ( 100 feet) of clear maneuvering area in front of each door. Siqnaqe -One freestanding business sign (pole, monument/ground, projecting or roof) is permitted per street frontage. Each sign shall not exceed an area greater than one and one- half square feet for each lineal foot of property frontage that is occupied by the business. In no case shall the sign exceed a total of 300 square feet (150 square feet per face). In addition to the permitted freestanding sign, wall signs with a copy area not exceeding 20% of the fa<;:ade to which it is applied is also permitted. The sign permit(s) will need to clearly identify square footages of the wall face and the sign to which it is applied, in order to determine compliance. Sensitive Areas: Based on the City's Critical Areas Maps, the site is located in a Seismic Hazard Area and within the 100-year flood plain. In addition, Category 2 and 3 wetlands and a Class 2 stream are located on the subject site. The seismic hazard is related to potential liquefaction of soils during an earthquake event. A geotechnical analysis for the site is Pre05~140 (Jl.. Lind Ave Business Park 2nd Mtg).doc required. The analysis needs to assess soil conditions and detail construction measures to assure building stability. Due to the site's location within the 100-year flood plain, a FEMA elevation certificate must be submitted at the time of building permit application. Stream buffers do not apply to piped streams; therefore no additional information regarding the piped stream will be required. The wetland report will need to be prepared by a qualified wetlands biologist and submitted with the formal land use application. For wetlands present, the applicable buffer widths based on the category of the wetland are required (Category 2 -50 ft.; and Category 3 -25 ft.). Due to the size of the wetland and it's location near a stream, the Army Corps of Engineers should be contacted to verify whether they have any jurisdiction over the wetland. Please refer to RMC 4-3-050.M. for additional regulations on wetlands. As outlined in the development regulations, a mitigation plan, five year monitoring, surety devices, etc. would be required. In addition, it appears that the wetlands located on the subject site may be hydrologically connected to Springbrook Creek, which is a Shoreline of the State. If the wetlands are hydrologically connected to Springbrook Creek, any impacts to the wetlands would require either a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit or a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Exemption. Environmental Review: The proposed project would be subject to Environmental (SEPA) Review as the proposal would result in the construction of more than 4,000 square feet of office area and more than 20 associated parking stalls and is not Categorically Exempt per · WAC 197-11-800. Permit Requirements: The proposal would require Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval, and Environmental (SEPA) Review. All permits would be reviewed in an estimated timeframe of 10 to 12 weeks. The application fee for joint land use applications is full price for the most expensive permit (Site Plan at $2,000) and half off any subsequent permits: 1/2 of full fee for a SEPA Review (Environmental Checklist) which is dependent on project value: less than $100,000 is $200 (1/2 of $400 full fee) and project value over $100,000 is a $500 fee (1/2 of $1,000 full fee). In addition to the required land use permits, separate construction, building and sign permits would be required. The review of these permits may occur concurrently with the review of the land use permits, but cannot be issued prior to the completion of any appeal periods. Impact Mitigation Fees: In addition to the applicable building and construction fees, the following mitigation fees would be required prior to the issuance of building permits. • A Transportation M1t1gation Fee based on $75.00 per new daily trip attributed to the development; • A Fire Mitigation Fee based on $0.52 per multi-family unit. A handout listing all of the City's Development related fees in attached for your review. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The existing development is located within the Employment Area Valley (EAV) Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation. The following proposed policies are applicable to the proposal: Land Use Element Policy LU-447. Developments should be encouraged to achieve greater efficiency in site utilization and result in benefits to users with techniques including: 1) Shared facilities such as parking and site access, recreation facilities and amenities; Pre05-l40 (IL Lind Ave Business Park 2nd Mtg).doc 2) An improved ability to serve development with transit by centralizing transit stops; and 3) An opportunity to provide support services (e.g. copy center, coffee shop or lunch facilities, express mail services) for nearby development that otherwise might not exist. Policy LU-455. Street trees and landscaping should be required for new development within the Valley to provide an attractive streetscape in areas subjected to a transition of land uses. Policy LU-456. Vehicular connections between adjacent parking areas are encouraged. Incentives should be offered to encourage shared parking. Policy LU-457. Site design for office uses and commercial, and mixed-use developments should consider ways of improving transit ridership through siting, locating of pedestrian amenities, walkways, parking, etc. Policy LU-459. New development, or site redevelopment, should conform to development standards that include scale of building, building fa<;:ade treatment to reduce perception of bulk, relationship between buildings, and landscaping. cc: Jennifer Henning Pre05·140 (IL Lind Ave Business Park 2nd Mtg).doc 7t St. IM · .. ~ U) IM -0 ~ 0 e IL IM IM CD F3 · 18 T23N RSE W 1/2 IM ~c~Ac,--------,~~..----C-A~~7, IM IM CD IM St CA CA CA CA CD .R---1 ·, :,:I '. I.II t'1 . t'1 -t:::'. I"' IH e ZONING P/BIPW T'BCHNICAL SBAVICB8 02/16/06 H3 · 30 T23N R5E W 1/2 ----Ru1toa en,. IJ.mlUI 0 230 po J.:'800 G3 19 T23N R5E W 1/2 5319 1 :/o (o ~O(;//()' DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION '/Uj WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT~ECFIVEO FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS Nf}V Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis , mi~'%!e~@aw.1tBir1r¥l~ti!1:Ji:r101r::111;~,;1.1I®*i1fai1ru1r Plat Name Reservation • Wireless: Applicant Agreement Statement ,AND 3 Inventory of Existing Sites 2 ANo 3 Lease Agreement, Draft 2 AND 3 Map of Existing Site Conditions 2 AND 3 Map of View Area 2 ANO, Photosimulations 2 AND, This requirement may be waivcid by: 1. Property Services Section 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section i. Development Planning Section PROJECTNAME: Und., Au~ Mw;ine.ss fe.r:k DATE: / ( /9 /0u, ' O:\WEA\PW\OFVSERV\Form~\Pl;;inninn\w.:1iVF'!rofs11hmiltalrAn~ R-00 xis 09/06 • DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVIS WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS This requirement may be waived by: 1 . Property ServiC0ll Section PROJECT NAME: l.i'n d Ave ]3.,.,s (>165 R.A::. 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section DATE: 1// ~ /ex., r 4. Development Planning Section Q:\WEB\PW\OEVSERV\Forms\Planning\waiverofsubmittalreqs_9·06.xls 09106 t Project Narrative Project Name, Size and Location: Tarragon LLC, 1s proposing to construct rhe C,__·d:1r JZr,n < _orporate Park. The Cedar R.ivcr Corpora re Park \:vill consist of four (4) office/retail/light mJustnal Luild111.,,_:--11 iialmg 143,307 '.::L]Uare feet un a ~ltc compnsc<l of approximately 12.<i acres. The project ts located 111 the ( ·m-of Rentun on the east side of Lind _Avenue S\X:" mid-way betv:een the intersection of Lind Avenue S\"':I;/ a:El S\\-1 ~.Jrli Street and Lind Avenue S\'(/ and S\V 27th ~tseet. Land Use Permits Required: The project will require SEPA Deterrnination a11d ~llc PLlll Rcvre\\· .. Addrno11al perrn1Ls mclude Commercial Buikling Permit, Grading Permit, and 1'-il'l)F:<:S. Zoning Designation of Site and Adjacent Properties: The site 1:::; zont·<l IL -L1ghL Industrial. J\djacent pr11pntws to the north and west are zoned CO -Conunercial Office, and to the east and south arc zoned IL L1µJ11 l 11dusu·ial. Current Use of Site and Existing Improvements: The subject site cons1sts of an approximately 1 :.r) :inc,. n J\1ghly rectangular shape that includes a sm,1l\ panhandle parcel that forms the sites northeastern corner. [ lwrL' :1rl' rirJ existing rn1provements on tht' site. The site 1s \eegctatcJ pri.tnartly with deciduous trf'es, tr1oderate hlackht rr1t·c-:md brush. "\Jo trees of significant size or type are locned on the property. The subject property is bound to 1hc 11, 11'1h bv a Category 2 "\\TtlanJ an<l S\\'' 21st Street RO\X,-!\\·hich is not built out)_, to the south by a Category 3 wei::tnd and:,;\\. 23rd SLteet RO\V (wl11ch is nut built out), Lollie east by a privately O'-\'t1td storage facility, and ro the west hy l .1nd _..\ ,,-enue. Special Site Features (wetlands, water bodies, steep slopes): The site is bordered by wetlands to the north (C:ltcgun· 2 \\·etland), to the south (Category 3 wetland), and to the east (Categor~· 3 \.\'edand) the E-'.x1sting Site Use and lrnprun'mt·nts descriptjon. There are no water hodies or steep slopes on the site. Soils Type and Drainage Conditions: .A geotcchntcal engineering survey was performed h~· "\ th:: Cieotcchnical Engineering Inc. in April 198.S and amended by Terra Associates, Inc. in ~ovember 2006. Thl· :--:11c \\·:ic-t'illed in the late 1960s. In accordance with the Terra Associates, Inc. Geotech111cal Repon, fill depth~ r-111µc fr, 1m 8 to 1 Cl feet a.cross the site. Fill matenal is composed of silry sand and sandy silt mixed \\1th fractured bn\nwk The s:tte JS divided inro rom sub-drainage basrn,; ,\ ppr• 1xm1ately t\.vo-thirds of site drainage sheet flows to the southeast to a Category 3 \vetland, while the rt'nJ:n1u11;,_ Llmcl of the site area drains to the north to a Category 2 wetland. Pagl: 1 o(2 Proposed Use of Property and Scope of Development: Proposed development of the site includes con~1n1n1n~. t"(1,1r (4) buildings wnh Sl]Uare footages ranging from approx.imaLely 30,000 to 44,500 (wtal square foriugc f,_H· (1,ur buildings is 14\1(17 st} paved park.mg lots an<l s1de\1,,:alks on the site and new s1de"1..valk ,1,,·1th111 tl1c public lZt_l\\/ along Lin<l ..Avcnuc; storm detention pond; stot!ll\\·ater pump syqern; bioswales and storm con-vf'yance S\ stcn1: .i ] ,-I-inch waterrnarn extension, including site fire hydrants, through the site; fire 1rrigation an<l domestic sc1TJCC< ,111 S rnch sanirary main ;rnd (Hnch side sewG: and, lan<lscap111g withm the sue interi()r and along Lrnd Avenue front.\~l·. Access: T\.\·o acce"ss clnn·s are proposed at Lind Avenue ;\t the 1111rthwcstcrn anJ southwesrern corner::. nfthe site. Barner free parking and building sidewalk r;:i.mps \\·ill be prnndcd l( 1 c:1ch of the four liujl<lmgs. Proposed Offsite Improvements: Offsitc unprovcmcnts consist of consttucting a nt·\, :-1tk,\·:1lk along the Lrnd ~'1..venue property frontage (we~tern boundary of the sne) at the existmg cen1ent concrete curh :md guw.:r. Estimated Construction Costs and Fair Market Value: Bu1ld111g Construction Estimate: $4,130Jl(l() Sitework Construction Eswnate: $2,SU0,000 Estimated Quantities and Type of Fill: The estimate cub and fills for the slte art· as follow~: Cut: ·t 3,305 cy Fill: 17,410 cy Number, Type and Size of Trees to be Removed: The site is sparsely covered by small diameter tnr, du1 .m·· native ro the area. No trees of s1gn1ficant size or type are located on the property, thus no sit,rnificant tree rl·:n1_1Y;d i:; rcqmrcd. Land Dedication: Land dedicauons are required for th1s project. Any Proposed Job Shack, Sales Trailer and/or Mobile Homes: · f'here will be a job shack located on site durmg prc1_jec: t'1 ,11:-, truction. Ko ~ail~ trailers or mobile homes are proposed to be mobilized. Proposed Modifications Being Requested: There are no modifications being requested at du. tin1t· l'ag<.'2of2 12/19/06 16:03 FAX 253 274 4778 Project C B,0/'<'i2. I<,\ v@ ~ Subject_Ifo::g.ti,:: Ir-:> (."I With/To /.../1,\)~ f.i Address G.-IT::f O"r-~,:>,OJ-.;) Date 1 ·z / I ";I / C C.,,. AHBL ENGINEERS Project No. :Zt:> (;,, z..:;;o , Ob # Faxed Pages-~---- By -~IM C"..JH!' .. LETo./'? D Page_\_ of_\ _ D Calculations t'59 Fax D Memorandum D Meeting Minutes Q Telephone Memo .1-l e ANT1 c., i;, A-TE:: T\41',, ·r-.~G<,.,c; ::;;.r~ (..-.) w,.,,r-,..,. f=:. )?t.J11.---t., ,. .. H.., <;. J,..11 U... VA /G 1 C> v St< ,.-, J""'. C Fo(e.. C'>r"F,~ 1c:;:, J...{A?-f-:=Jf-e»>s& t.>?G. /NI nA-• .... 1 .. .1.. .. y ,hi6 f7~17, c..1 A f2A.T Io c-.,p fie::>$ ~F ca;; Je,, f"C? }l, f,clA:R.E. +f0<.)~1:';. , J?~c.AvSE ),JJ=: t-1-AVG Jt0~vi:>IS,-o A ff=;'.DS.5ii?..1A:-,-:, FJ2'..1JS.,-;D1...., 'f;>l5r:;.1e,., µ. A-1c.e-~~I> Wes ~r..:n ..... C>t ,-l ", '7 h~v Tl-!~ offcR 1.J ,-:> 1 T·r ,c,. IN c..fl&A-~2 cFI';;" ,c.(S 5f' 1t-c. ~ t$ y f';?.. o v , .::. , ./'-.J c.. I-<> r '? c> F ooo R. S> 1,e.t /TH c.,,,,t...Az.1,-J&, > iH&-,-JuJY!. ~R 'F-c>.e OifCcc_e:,;c: c.ovL-C C,o r.,PP ro Aif'ov"'-.l o ? 'i % tc..7. "i·'e') (3") = ·~z-;;, ">1"~'? J>1c~ ( C 7 . 1-2' ( <\-. ,;) ;::J 4 ~'\-?fl->,t.k-"'=> ~ ToT.l"r1;.. $1A-L-<-$, t4 1,-:, ::= ~ 4-7 /'A.A)<. ::::,. 'l;ioi':'.> f'JZc, VI c,r.;o ::= 4-C'E. f..l~ A;.e Sttowlt-k"I f',:~ Jt?, fboT DC=ii-&? $1'1\-'-'- W 111-! A-Z. n!JC';,.1 6Vl21<.t-',A-i-lc.., f:?'1.1'.:=i21l<ll-l~Rli':- Jc. Ac-l'tU=>VS-A-2..0 f==.T D~tJ<. AL-I-'5>/0&klA<..-¥--7 HA-lie . ~:e:t-\ Dl::->K.-,N.P'c. ,-o Mee>• AD h-G.LJ 1D.;,t--l.t->G';) IN A-D'r?1""<0,-.) Tl-lfti::' 2-A,01 e,vi;::::-i2.t-lA~G,. If this does not meet with your understanding, please coritact us in writing within seven days. THANK YOU. Ii!] 001 Civil £Engineers Strur;tural Engineers Landscape Architects Community Planners Land Surveyors Neighbors QTACOMA 2215 N. 30lh St. Suite 300 Tacoma, WA 98403-3305 253.383.2422 253.383.2572 FAX OsEATTLE 1200 6th Avenue Suite 1620 Seaijle, WA 98101-3123 206.267.2425 206.267.2429 FAX Civil Engineering Construction Mitigation Description See attached. Page 1 qf" ·1 12-18;06 10 47AM FROM-'.ARRAGON December 14, 2006 City of Renton Development Services Division l 055 South Grady Way Renton, WA. 98055 Re: Cedar River Corporate Park 1061330160 T-44: P 01/01 F-384 n TARRAGON In preparation of our Site Plan Review for the above referenced project, please find below our comments addressing the Construction Mitigation. We are planning construction to start April 2007 and to finish with the shell December 2007. Subsequent construction activities will consist of tenant improvements as we lease the spaces Hours of operation are scheduled to be Monday through Friday 7 :OOAM to 5 :OOPM. Due to job conditions, longer hours may be required as well as weekend work. This will be determined as the need arises. Hauling and transportation routes: Hwy 167, SW 41" exit, Lind Ave. Measures to minimize dust will include controlled water distribution (misting) over the site to reduce dust. Traffic impacts will be minimized via flagging. Temporary erosion control systems as shovm on our TESC plan will be utilized to control erosion including but not limited to silt fencing, ponds, interceptor swales, rock check dams, and rock construction entrances. Currently we have no traffic control plan as we are not scheduled to perform any work in Lind Ave directly. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. :;;~:L Ed Wilson Senior Project Manager Tarragon Construction. L.L.C. 12/18/06 MON 11:47 ITX/RX NO 7473] Brenda Richardson From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Jill Ding [JDing@ci.renton.wa.us] Monday, December 18, 2006 12 32 PM Connie Linden Brenda Richardson; Jim Carleton; Paul McCormick; Ted Hill; wps@isp.com; MMcCullough@Tarragon.com Re: Habitat Data Report -Cedar River (formerly Lind Avenue)Project A copy of this email should suffice. Jill K. Ding Senior Planner City of Renton 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 jding@ci.renton.wa.us Ph, (425) 430-7219 Fx, (425) 430-7300 >>> "Connie Linden" <clinden@AHBL.com> 12/18/2006 12:29 PM>>> Jill, Thank you for the phone message. I understand from your telephone message that a Habitat Data Report is not required for the Cedar R_;__ver (formerly Lind Avenue) project. If the intake desk should have questions, should we refer them to you, or, will a copy of this email suffice? Thank you again for your help on this project. Connie Linden Project Engineer TACOMA* SEATTLE 253.383.2422 TEL 253.383.2572 FAX www.ahbl.com Civil Engineers* Structural Engineers * Landscape Architects* Community Planners* Land Surveyors* Neighbors DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Phone 425-430-7200 Fax 425-430-7231 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPAi Chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a ,xoposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to l1elp the agency decide whether an EIS 1s required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to descritie some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best descr;ption you can. You must answer each question accurately ard carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases. you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Co:nplete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later Some questions ask about governmenta! regulat:ons. such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any add1t1onal information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonpro1ect proposals even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "proJect," "applicant" and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area,'' respectively. V\?lanning\Yr _ 2006\206200\20Decl01.doc12/15/06 A. BACKGROUND Name of proposed pro1ect, 1f appl1cab,e Cedar River Corporate Park 2 Name of applicant: Tarragon, LLC 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person Applicant: Contact: Tarragon, LLC Jim Carleton 1000 Second Avenue, Suite 3200 AHBL, Inc. Seattle, WA 98104 2215 North 30th Street (206) 233-9600 Tacoma, WA 98403 (253) 383-2422 4. Date checklist prepared December 15, 2006 5 Agency requesting checklist. City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (includirig phas,og, 1f applicable) Project construction would begin in March 2007 and continue until the winter of 2008. 7. Do you have any plans for future add,t,ons. expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Wetland Analysis, Stream Classification, and Shoreline Master Program Applicability Report, prepared by Wetland Permitting Services, October 18, 2006 Geotechnical Report, prepared by Terra Associates, Inc., December 7, 2006 Traffic Impact Analysis, prepared by Jake Traffic Engineering, December 11, 2006 9 Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None. 10. List any governmental approvals or :,cr,11ts that will be needed for your proposal, if known. SEPA Determination -City of Renton Site Plan Review -City of Renton Grading Permit -City of Renton Commercial Building Permit -City of Renton Construction Stormwater General Permit -Department of Ecology 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. V:\PI anning\ Yr __ 2006 1..2 06200\2 DO eel O 1 doc 2 The project involves the construction of four (4) buildings totaling approximately 143,307 square feet of floor space on a 12.6-acre site. Approximately 10.2 acres will be disturbed to construct the project. Building A will be approximately 35,047 square feet and be located on the west side of the property; Building B will be approximately 29,940 square feet and be located on the north side of the property; Building C will be approximately 33,740 square feet and be located on the south side of the property; and Building D will be approximately 44,580 square feet and be located on the east side of the property. The use of the buildings will be divided approximately in half between office and warehousing uses. Other site improvements will include parking, truck loading areas, landscaping, stormwater control facilities, and utilities. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficiert ,·,formation for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed pro1ect. including a street address. if any, and section, township. and range if known If a proposal would occur over a range of area. provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal descr•pt1on. site plan. vicinity map. and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist The project is located in the City of Renton on the east side of Lind Avenue SW midway between the intersection of Lind Avenue SW and SW 19th Street and Lind Avenue SW and SW 27th Street. From Renton City Hall, proceed west on S. Grady Way and turn left onto Lind Avenue SW. Proceed approximately 3/. miles south on Lind Avenue SW. The site is located on the left past the fire station on the left and the Southgate Office Plaza on the right. King County tax parcel number 334040-0285, located in the SW quarter of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East. V:\Planning\Yr _20061206200\2D0ecl01.doc 3 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one): flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous. other ______ _ b. What 1s the steepest slope or, the site (approximate percent slope?) The site is generally flat except for small isolated areas adjacent to the wetlands on the southern boundary of the site where the slope down to the wetland may be a 50 percent slope. c What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classif1cat1on of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. According to the wetland report. the primary type of soils is urban land, primarily compacted fill placed on the site prior to 1970. The underlying soils are silty loam. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No, please see the attached Geotechnical Report for more details. e. Describe the purpose, type and appcoximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The preliminary earthwork calculations indicate that here will be approximately 13,305 cubic yards of cut and 17,430 cubic yards of fill. If needed, any required fill will come from an approved site. f Could erosion occur as a result of clearrng, construction, or use? If so, generally describe Erosion could potentially occur during clearing and construction. Potential erosion impacts would be controlled as noted in item B.1.h below. g About what percent of tne site w1!I be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 77 percent. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any· 2. AIR A temporary erosion control plan will be designed and implemented to reduce and control erosion during clearing and construction. Erosion after project completion is unlikely due to the large amount of impervious surface on the site. a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i e , dust, automobile. odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the pro1ect is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities ,f known. Construction activities on the site will stir up dust particles and construction vehicles and equipment will be a potential source of exhaust emissions. After project completion, the primary sources of emissions will be automobile exhaust. b Are there any off-s,te sources o' em ssion or odor that may affect your proposal? If so. generally describe. No. V:\Planning\Yr _2006\2062D0\200ecl01 doc 4 c. Proposed measures to reduce o: cor:trol emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Conform to vehicle emission standards and practice dust abatement measures during clearing and grading. 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams. saltwater. lakes. ponds. wetlands)? If yes. describe type and provide names. If appropriate. state what stream or river it flows into. Yes. There are two wetlands on or near the project site. Wetland A is located north of the site. and is classified as Category II. Wetland B is located on the east and south boundaries of the project site, and is classified as Category Ill. There is an unnamed tributary of Springbrook Creek located approximately 150 feet south of the project site. Please see the attached Wetland Analysis, Stream Classification, and Shoreline Master Program Applicability Report prepared by Wetland Permitting Services for more details. 2) Will the proiect require any work over. in, or adJacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes. The project will require work within 200 feet of all the waters described above. Construction of stormwater bioswale facilities within the buffers of both wetlands A and B and the construction of stormwater discharge facilities within both wetlands A and B and their buffers is proposed. Please see the attached site plan and Wetland Analysis, Stream Classification, and Shoreline Master Program Applicability Report prepared by Wetland Permitting Services for more details. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal requ:re surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description. purpose and approximate quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal l,e with:n a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. Yes, the entirety of the site lies within a 100-year floodplain, however the site has been fi I led prior to 1970 and the existing ground elevations are several feet over the 100 year flood elevation. There will be no filling in the floodplain. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge The proposal will not discharge any waste materials to surface waters. Stormwater will be treated and discharged into both wetlands A and 8. All stormwater will be collected via a closed conveyance system and conveyed to a pump chamber, and then pumped to a detention pond. Release from the detention pond will be controlled via 2 multi-orifice control structures V.\Planning\Yr _ 2006\20620D\200ecl01 doc 5 and released to bioswales for treatment prior to release to wetlands A and B. For additional details, please refer to the Technical Information Report (TIR) for the project. b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste mater.al that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources. 1f any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ; agricultural, etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systerns the number of houses to be served (if applicable). or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. No waste materials will be discharged to groundwater. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. The source of runoff will be stormwater. Temporary erosion and sediment control (TESC) measures will be implemented to control stormwater and capture runoff during clearing and construction. After project completion, all stormwater will be collected via a closed conveyance system and conveyed to a pump chamber, and then pumped to a detention pond. Release from the detention pond will be controlled via two multi-orifice control structures and released to bioswales for treatment prior to release to wetlands A and B. Approximately 23% of the flow will be directed to wetland A (Category II) to the north and 77% will be directed to wetland B (Category Ill) to the south. Flow spreaders will distribute discharge into these wetlands. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts if any: Temporary erosion and sediment control (TESC) measures to reduce and control impacts to water during clearing and construction will be implemented. These measures will include, but may not be limited to, rock check dams, interceptor swales, silt fencing, temporary sediment pond(s), and stabilized construction entrances. In the final developed condition, runoff impacts will be controlled via the stormwater system described above in B.3.c.1. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation fm:nd on the site: ~ deciduous tree: alder. rna;ile. aspen, other ~~-evergreen tree: fir, cedar. pine other ~ shrubs V \Plannirg\Yr _2006\206200\200ecl01.doc 6 grass pasture crop or gram L_ wet soil plants g_atta1,_ buttercu~. bullrush, skunk cabbage, other __L___ water plants: water lily. te_tlgras~ milfoil, other __ other types of vegetation b What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? All vegetation except that in wetlands and associated buffers will be removed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d. Proposed landscaping, use of r1at1ve plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if a:1y Parking lot and perimeter landscaping will be installed per Renton Municipal Code. Vegetation in wetlands and wetland buffers will remain unaffected except where stormwater bioswales will be installed to preserve the integrity of these valuable habitats. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site Birds hawk, heron, eagle songbirds. other ________ _ Mammals: deer. bear, elk. beaver otner __________ _ Fish: bass, salmon. trout. he,ring. shellfish, other ______ _ b List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. The unnamed tributary of Springbrook Creek located approximately 150 feet to the south of the site is designated as Class 2 water, and is identified as coho salmon habitat. c Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain Yes, the site is within the Pacific Flyway for migratory birds. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Parking lot and perimeter landscaping will be installed per Renton Municipal Code. Vegetation in wetlands and wetland buffers will remain unaffected except where stormwater bioswales will be installed to preserve the integrity of these valuable habitats. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity and natural gas will be required. b Would your proJect affect the potential use of solar energy by adJacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. V:\Planning\Yr _2006\206200\200ecl01 .doc 7 c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts. if any· None. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill. or hazardous waste. that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so. describe No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. No special emergency services would be required. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards. 1f any None. b. Noise 1) What types of noise ex:st ,n the area which may affect your pro1ect (for example: traffic, equipment operation. other)? None. 2) What types and leve's of noise would be created by or associated with the pro1ect on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate wr1at hours noise would come from the site. Construction traffic and noise would be generated during clearing and construction. These noise impacts would occur between 7am and 6pm. After construction, noise would be primarily generated by workers commuting to and from the site during regular commuting hours, 7am to 9am and 4pm to 6pm, and by truck traffic associated with the warehouse use at all times during the day. Primarily trucks would generate some additional traffic noise after the regular workday. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: During construction, comply with vehicle noise standards and follow noise abatement practices. After construction, no special measures are proposed. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is presently vacant. To the north are vacant lands, which are primarily a wetland and a City of Renton fire station. To the east is a mini-storage facility. To the south is vacant land. To the west is Lind Avenue and a business park. b Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c Describe any structures on the site The site is vacant. V .\Plann1ng 1.Yr __ 2D06\206200\200ecl01.doc 8 d Will any structures be demol1sl1ed? If so, what? No. e What is the current zoning ciass1;1cat1on of the site? IL -Industrial Light f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Employment Area -Valley g. If applicable, what is the carre1t shore.ine master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site beer cassi'ied as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so. specify Yes, there are two wetlands located on the site. Please see the site plan for their locations, and the attached Wetland Analysis, Stream Classification, and Shoreline Master Program Applicability Report for more details. 1. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed pro1ect? Approximately 300 people would work in the completed project. Approximately how many people would the completed pro1ect displace? None. k Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts. if any None. I. Proposed measures to ensure the pcoposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans. if any Landscaping and site improvements will be installed. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing None. b. Approximately how many uni:s f any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housir1g None. c Proposed measures to reduce o: control housing impacts. 1f any: None. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s). not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) voposed. Approximately 30 feet. The principal building material will be concrete. b. What views in the immediate v,c1ni'y would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or contcol aesthetic impacts. if any: V\Plannmg'·.Yr _2006\206200\200ecl01 .doc 9 None. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare w1;1 the oroposal produce? What t,me of day would it mainly occur? The completed project would produce light and glare from overhead lights and from office windows. Light and glare would be present during nighttime hours. b. Could light or glare from the f,nished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. Overhead lighting would be used in increase safety. c What ex1st1ng off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts. if any: None. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and infoccnal recrea!ional opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? No designated or informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity, as the area is a predominately industrial area. The nearest recreational opportunities are Lake Street Park approximately 2 '.!, miles travel distance to the northeast (1/2 mile direct line), Bicentennial Park in Tukwila approximately 2 miles travel distance to the west (1 mile direct line), and Fort Dent Park in Tukwila approximately 2 '!. miles travel distance to the west (1 '/, miles direct) b. Would the proposed pro1ect d splace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by tne project or applicant, 1f any: None. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a Are there any places or ob,ects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so. generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any lardmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, sc1ent1fic, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: If culturally significant objects are found during construction, the Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation will be notified, and appropriate measures will be taken. 14. TRANSPORTATION V:\Planning\Yr _2006\206200\2D0ecl01.doc 10 a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system Show or1 s·tc plans, if any. The site is accessed from Lind Avenue Southeast. Lind Avenue Southeast provides access to 1-405 and SR 167. b Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes; Metro Transit routes 153,161, and 247 serve the site, with weekday service to Renton, Kent, Tukwila, Seattle, Factoria, Eastgate, and Overlake. c. How many parking spaces woulc the completed proJect have? How many would the proJect eliminate? The project will have 408 parking spaces. None would be eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? Street improvements on Lind Avenue will include sidewalks and street trees. e. Will the pro1ect use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per c!ay would be generated by the completed pro1ec\? If known. indicate when peak volumes would occur. Please refer to the attached Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Jake Traffic Engineering, Inc. g Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any Please refer to the attached Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Jake Traffic Engineering, Inc. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the pro1ect result ,n an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The project would result in a slight increased need for public safety services such as police and fire protection, b. Proposed measures to reduce or coritrol direct impacts on public services, if any. None. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently ava,laole at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse senvice, telephone, sanitary sewer. septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are ~ro~osed for the project, the utility providing the service. and the general construction act1v1tes or the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. No additional senvices would be required. Senvice connections to existing senvices will be necessary to serve the project. Providing these connections may involve some clearing and excavation work on and off-site. V:\Plann1ng\Yr _ 2006\206200\20Decl01 doc 11 C. SIGNATURE L the undersigned. state that to tile best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead c1gency may withdraw any declaration of non~significance that it might issue ,n reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part Proponent Name Printed: Date ~ ,P_.._ ~·------- J a s o"' R ~& e.-r:~3~~ _ l Z./ / Y-(ZCI O~C~----- V·\Planning\Yr _2006\206200\200ecl01 .doc 12 Printed: 12-27-2006 Payment Made: CITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA06-172 Receipt Number: Total Payment: 12/27/2006 09:39 AM 2,500.00 Payee: TARRAGON LLC Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment Check #10161 2,500.00 Account Balances Amount 500.00 2,000.00 Trans Account Code Description Balance Due 3021 303.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee 5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat 5013 000.345.81.00.0010 PUD 5014 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Temp Use or Fence Review 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend 5909 000.341.60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable) 5954 604.237.00.00.0000 Special Deposits 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 . 00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 R0606307