HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA-07-008_Report 1STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING }
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
PUBLIC NOTICE
Linda M Mills, being frrst duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising
Representative of the
Renton Reporter
a bi-weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general
circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date
of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language
continuously as a bi-weekly newspaper in King County, Washington_ The
Renton Reporter has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the
Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County.
The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the
Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was regularly
distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed
notice, a:
Public Notice
was published on September 26, 2007,
The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum
of $105.00_
d~ //l?l'lt4.
f:,rr;'di. M_ Mills
Legal Advertising Representative, Renton Reporter
Subscribed and sworn to me this I" day of October, 2007. \\\11 11 '1/""
",\ f>.~TEl.O II" aD. C2mtl;.u " v ............ ~ "
_ _ _ _~~I~ .:r-<:) •• .;'O\ON EX.b/,;... ~ -::L~=-",-:'---~~'-,I-'---"t,.f=--,bG'LF--./ ~ t:b •• ~ ~.;..-:.
BDCantelon = !g ~ \ z~
Notary Public for the State of Washington, Residing uB<.e~pW i 0 :
paN be -:: ~ f'\l II-:: . . urn r. , (f).. : {!J -
-:. :.>. -.. ~ ..... ~.-~ " -:;. .., >.·· •• '!3/011-f,;··. ~ ~ , 'I:; ....... ~)<-..
"," OF 'J'I ~ \\\"
"1111111\\\
CITY OF RENTON
NOTICE OF ORDINANCES
ADOPTED BY RENTON CITY
COUNCIL
Following is a summary of two
ordinances adopted by the Renton
City Council on September 17, 2007,
correcting the effectuation dates:
ORDINANCE NO.li304
An ordinance of the Citr of Renton,
Washington, amending Chapter 4~4,
City~wjde Property Development
Standard., Chap"'r 4-7, Subdivision
Regulations, Chap1m' 4-8, Permits -
General and Appeals, Chapter 4-9,
Permits -Specific and Chapter 4-11,
Definitions, of Title IV (Development
Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260
entitled "Code of General Ordinances
of the City of Renton, Washingtonn by
changing the regu.iations for tree
retention and removal
Effective: 1012612007
ORDINANCE NO. 11305
An ordinance of tho City of Renton.
Washington, amending Chapter::: 2
"Zoning Districts -Use.~ and
Standarlli:" and <1 ~City"wide Property
Development Stundards" of Title IV
(Development Regulations) of
Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of
General Ordinances of the City of
Renton, Washington" to amend the
regulation of animals.
Effective: 1012612007
Complete text of these ordinances is
available at Renton City Hall, 1055
South Grady Way; and posted at the
Renton Public Libraries, 100 Mill
Avenue South and 2902 NE 12th
Street. Upon request to the City
Clerk's office, (425) 430-6510, copies
will also be mailed for a fee.
Bonnie L Walton
City Clerk
Published in the Renton Reporter,
September 26, 2007_ #864178.
c· ,'\(" Cl~ i~:~{"··' c.
STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING}
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
PUBLIC NOTICE
Linda M Mills, being fIrst duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising
Representative of the
Renton Reporter
a bi-weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general
circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the dale
of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language
continuously as a bi-weekly newspaper in King County, Washington. The
Renton Reporter has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the
Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County.
The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the
Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was regularly
distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed
notice, a:
Public Notice
was published on September 22, 2007.
The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum
of $218.40.
/~~m~
trndaM. Mills
Legal Advertising Representative, Renton Reporter
Subscribed and sworn to me this 24'" day of September, 2007.
b,l) ((;a7il1trn ~,-\\\\'~I~/I"II,
B D Cantelon , ... " V S ... r:.!.~< '''-:.
Notary Public for the State of Washington, Resil9h~·~@I,"WififrJ;o!l;.
P 0 N b ~ • ,> '.p'-. . mn er: :: loo ~\ ~
~ : NOTARY"': .',", ~ . -
:;: 'N : PUBUC : 2: = ".,--\~ :0-.';;. 'Y.... ~ ~ ~? ,;>. •• OJ' C) .. I.;:. ... ::. ~ ·· •• ;01/20: •• ·:..,0 ~ ~ 0 ........ \"" , .....
'.':" 'f::' WASYi \\",
11""11\\\\
CITY OF RENTON
NOTICE OF ORDINANCES
ADOPTF..IJ BY RENTON CITY
COUNCIL
Following is a sUlIlJruU')' of ordinances:
adopted by the Renton City Council on
SeptembOT 17,2007:
ORDINANCE NO. 5301
An ordinance of the-City of Renton,
Washington, annexing approximately
4.89-acrea. generally located
immediately south of S. 55th St. and
immediately east of Talbot Rd. S.
(Aothone' Annexation; A·Q4..()03). The
legal description is on file at the City
Clerk's office, and is available upon
request.
Effective: 1012212007
ORDINANCE NO. 5302
An ordinance of the City of Renton.
Washington. establishing the zoning
classification of approximately 4.89-
acres, generally located immediately
south of S. 55th St. and east of Talbot
Rd. S., as R-4 (Residential 4 DUlAC;
Four Dwelling Units per Acre)
(Anthone' Annexation; A·(}.1-003t The
legal description is on file at the City
Clerk's office, and is available upon
request.
Effective: ]0/22/2007
ORDINANCE NO. 5303
An ordinanoo of the City of Renton,
Washington, amending the 2007
Budget, by transfening $50,000 from
the 2007 Airport 608 Hangar
Expansion Project and $99,000 from
the 2007 622 Hangar Rehabilitation
Project to fund the contract with
Hams, Miller, Miller, & Hanson to
perform an Airport Noise Study.
Effective: 1012212007
ORDINANCE NO. 5304
Ao ordinance of the City of Renton,
Washington, amending Chapter 4-4,
City~wid.c Property Development
Standards, Chapter 4-7, Sulxlivibion
Regulations, Chaptar 4-8, Permit. -
General and Appeals, Chapter 4-9,
Lv..A 0 l-C:C'2
Pennits -Specific and Chapter 4·11,
Definitions, of Title IV (Development
Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260
entitled "Code of General Ordinances
of the City of Renton, Washington' by
changing the regulations for tree
retention and remova.l.
Effectivo: 912712007
ORDINANCE NO. 5305
An ordinance of the City of Renton,
Washington. amending Chapters 2
"Zoning Districts -Uses and
Standards" and 4 "City·wide Property
Development Standards" of Title IV
(Development Regulations) of
Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of
General Ordinances of the City of
Renton, Washington" to amend the
regulation of animals.
~ective:~J2007
ORDINANCE NO. 5306
An ordinance of the City of Renton,
Washington, a.mending Section 4-2-
110A "Development Standards for
Single Family R8sidential Zoning
Designations" and Note 10 of Section
4-2-110D "Conditions Associated with
Development Standnrds Table for
Single Family Residential Zoning
Desibrnations" of Chapter 2 "Zoning
Districts -Uses and Standards" of
Title N (Development Regulations) of
Ordinance 4260 entitled "Code of
General Ordinances of the City of
Renton, WashingtCtn" relating to
cluster development.
Effective: 9/27/2007
Complete text of these ordinances is
available at Renton City Hnll. 1055
South Grady Way; and posted at the
Renton Public Libraries, 100 Min
Avenue SQuth Dnd 2902 NE 12th
Street. Upon request to the City
Clerk', office, (425) 430·6510, copies
win also be mailed for a fee.
Bonnie 1. Walton
City Clerk
Published in the Renton Reporter,
September 22, 2007. #864143.
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 5306
Amends: ORD 5100, 5132,
5153
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING SECTION 4-2-110A "DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS" AND
NOTE 10 OF SECTION 4-2-110D "CONDITIONS ASSOCIATED WITH
DEVEWPMENT STANDARDS TABLE FOR SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS" OF CHAPTER 2 "ZONING
DISTRICTS -USES AND STANDARDS" OF TITLE IV (DEVEWPMENT
REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF
GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON"
RELATING TO CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
SECTIONL Section 4-2-11 O.A "Development Standards for Single Family
Residential Zoning Designations" of Chapter 2 "Zoning Districts -Uses and Standards" of Title
IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of
the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended, as shown in Attachment "A" to allow
certain R-8 standards in the R-4 zone when clustering.
SECTION II. Section 4-2-IIO.D "Conditions Associated with Development
Standards" "Table for Single Family Residential Zoning Designations" of Chapter 2 "Zoning
Districts -Uses and Standards of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260
entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended, by
amending note #10 to read as follows:
Small lot clusters of up to a maximum offifty (50) lots shall be allowed within the R-4 Zone,
when at least thirty percent (30"10) of the site is permanently set aside as "significant open
space". Such open space shall be situated to act as a visual buffer between small lot clusters
1
ORDINANCE NO. 5306
and other development in the zone. The percentage of open space required may be reduced
by the reviewing official to twenty percent (20"10) of the site when:
a. Public access is provided to the open space; and
b. Soft surface trails are provided within wetland buffers; and
c. Storm water ponds are designed to eliminate engineered slopes requiring
fencing and enhanced to allow passive andlor active recreation.
All portions of a site that are not dedicated to platted single family lots or a dedicated right
of way shall be set in a separate tract andlortracts to preserve existing viable stands of trees
or other native vegetation. The tract may also be used as a receiving area for tree
replacement requirements in accordance with RMC 4-4-130H.
Such tracts shall be shown and recorded on the face of the plat to be preserved in perpetuity.
Such tracts may be included in contiguous open space for the purposes of qualifYing for
small lot clustered development.
Where trees are removed, they shall be replaced in accordance with RMC 4-4-130 H.
SECTION IlL This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and
five days after its publication
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 17th day of September ,2007.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
2
ORDINANCE NO. 5306
APPROVED BY TIIE MAYOR this 17th day of_-'S""e""p""to:..:e::.:m::..:b:.:e:.:r ___ ---', 2007.
Approved as to form:
cf..~--~~
Lawrence lwaITen:itYAtt0111ey
Date of Publication: 9/22/2007 (summary)
ORD.1377:08/16/07:ch
3
~I
o z
"" '-' z « z
H r::. ..: o
4-2-110A
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS
-< ...
5 e
.CI
~
~
LOT DIMENSIONS
Minimum Lot Size for
lots created alter
November 10, 2004
Minimum Lot Width for
lots created af1er
November 10, 2004
Minimum Lot Depth for
lots created af1er
RC
10 acres.
150 ft. for interior lots.
175 ft. for comer lots.
200 ft.
(Primary and Attached Accessory Structures)
R-1 R-4 R-8
1 acre.
4,500 sq. ft. for parcels
8,000 sq. ft., 11.13 except for greater than 1 acre.
10,000 sq. ft. for cluster small lot clusters 'o where R-8
development." standards shall apply. 5,000 sq. ft. for parcels 1
acre or less.
75 ft. for interior lots.
85 ft. for comer lots. 70 ft. for interior lots.
Except for clustered 80 ft. for comer lots.11. 13
development within 50 ft. for interior lots.
designated Urban
Except for small lot clusters'o 60 ft. for comer lots.
where R-8 standards shall
Separators, R-4 standards
apply.
shall apply for both interior
and comer lots .
85 ft. 80 ft., 11. 13 except for small 65 ft.
lot ciusters 10 where R-8
~I
o z
w u z
"'" Z
H
Q
'" o
November 10, 2004
SETBACKS4
Minimum Front Yard
Minimum Side Yard
Along a street
Minimum Side Yard
30 ft.a 30 ft."
30 ft.7 20 ft.7
25 ft. 15 ft.
standards shall apply.
30 ft., 12, 13 except for small
lot clusters 10 where R-8
standards shall apply.
Unit with Alley Access
Garage: The front yard
setback of the primary
structure may be reduced to
20 ft. if all parking is
provided in the rear yard of
the lot with access from a
public right-aI-way or alley"
20 ft.1:>' 13
15 ft. is allowed in small lot
clusters 1O .
15 combined ft.12, 13 is
allowed with a minimum of 5
fl. for any side yard.
-----
15 ft. for primary structure.
20 ft. for attached garages
accessed from front or side
yard street.
Unit with Alley Access
Garage: The front yard
setback of the primary
structure may be reduced to
10 It. if all parking is
provided in the rear yard of
the lot with access from a
public right-of-way or alley.6
15 1t.7 for the primary
structure and 20 ft. for
attached garages which
access from the front and
side yard along a street.
5 ft.
.~
•
~I
o z
"" u z
<
Z
H
Q
"" o
Minimum Rear Yard
Clear VISion Area
Minimum Freeway
Frontage Setback
35 ft.
In no case shall a
structure over 42 in. in
height intrude into the 20
ft. clear vision area
defined in RMC 4-11---
030.
10ft. landscaped setback
from the street property
line.
5 ft. is allowed in small lot
clusters 'o ..
25 ft.
25 ft. 20 ft. is allowed in small lot 20 ft.
clusters 'o .
I n no case shall a structure In no case shall a structure In no case shall a structure
over 42 in. in height intrude over 42 in. in height intrude over 42 in. in height intrude
into the 20 ft. clear vision into the 20 ft. clear vision into the 20 ft. clear vision
area defined in RMC 4-11-area defined in RMC 4-11-area defined in RMC 4-11-
030. 030. 030.
10ft. landscaped setback
10ft. landscaped setback 10ft. landscaped setback
from the street property
line.
from the street property line. from the street property line.
, Amends: ORD 4963. 5100
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 5305
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING CHAPTERS 2 "ZONING DISTRICTS -USES AND
STANDARDS" AND 4 "CITY-WIDE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS" OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF
ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON" TO
AMEND THE REGULATION OF ANIMALS.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
SECTIONL Section 4-2-060 "Zoning Use Table -Uses Allowed in Zoning
Designations" of Chapter 2, "Zoning Districts -Uses and Standards," of Title IV (Development
Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton,
Washington" is hereby amended, changing the Zoning Use Table to allow the maximum number
oflarge animals per acre to be two (2), to read as shown in Attachment" A".
SECTION II. Section 4-2-080 "Conditions Associated with Zoning Use Tables,"
of Chapter 2, "Zoning Districts -Uses and Standards" of Title IV (Development Regulations) of
Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances ofthe City of Renton, Washington",
is hereby amended by changing the text of note #36 to read as follows:
A greater number of animals per acre than are otherwise allowed in this zone may be
permitted as an Administrative Conditional Use; provided:
a. The keeping of animals meets the conditions ofRMC 4-4-010F, General
Requirements for Keeping Animals; and
1
ORDINANCE NO. 5305
b. For large & medium animals, a farm management plan has been adopted based on the
King County Conservation District's Farm Conservation and Practice Standards
showing that adequate pasturage to support a larger number of animals is provided.
SECTION III. Subsection L ''Non conforming uses" of Section 4-4-010
"Standards and Review Criteria for Keeping Animals," of Title IV (Development Regulations)
of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton,
Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows:
In cases where the keeping of animals does not comply with these regulations, the
situation shall be classified as a nonconforming use.
SECTION IV. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and
~dk.,..r-t1 ~/ £We days after its publication.
\:!J PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 17th dayof September, 2007.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 17th dayof September ,2007.
Approved as to form:
cL~ey.,~~
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication: 9/26/2007 (summary)
ORD.1375:08116/07:ch
2
-
4-2-060 ZONING USE TABLE -USES ALLOWED IN ZONING DESIGNTATIONS:
~I
o
Z
r<1
U
Z
"'" Z
H
Q
"'" o
...::
5
j
ZONING USE TABLE
USES:
B. ANIMALS AND RELATED USES
Animal Husbandry (20 or fewer small
animals per acre)
Animal Husbandry (4 or fewer
medium animals per acre)
Animal Husbandry (maximum of 2
large animal per acre)
Greater number of animals than
allowed above
Beekeeping
Kennels
Kennels, Hobby
Pets, common household, up to 3 per
dwelling unit, or business
establishment
Stables, commercial
RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS
RC R-l R-4 R-8
PSI PSI PSI PSI
PSI PSI PSI PSI
PSI PSI PSI PSI
AD36 AD36 AD36 AD36
P35 P35 P35 P35
AD37
AC37 AC37 AC37 AC37
AC AC AC AC
AD37 AD37 --
RMH R-IO
PSI
PSI
PSI
AD36
AC37 AC37
AC AC
--
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 5304
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING CHAPTER 4-4, CITY-WIDE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS, CHAPTER 4-7 SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS, CHAPTER
4-8, PERMITS-GENERAL AND APPEALS, CHAPTER 4-9, PERMITS-
SPECIFIC AND CHAPTER 4-11, DEFINITIONS, OF TITLE IV
(DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260
ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF
RENTON, WASHINGTON" BY CHANGING THE REGULATIONS FOR
TREE RETENTION AND REMOVAL.
WHEREAS, the retention of mature trees in the City of Renton helps maintain the
natural environment, provides effective natural stormwater control, enhances aesthetics and
landscaping in newly developed areas, provides a high quality environment for businesses and
families, provides natural insulation from extreme temperatures, helps to maintain Renton's
existing tree canopy, absorbs Carbon Dioxide, reduces pollution, and is part of the green
infrastructure of the City; and
WHEREAS, the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Community Design Element goals
are to raise the aesthetic quality of the City, to strengthen the economy through high quality
development, and to ensure that a high quality oflife is maintained as Renton evolves; and
WHEREAS, the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Environmental Element goal is to
continue protection of Renton's natural systems, natural beauty, and environmental quality; and
WHEREAS, the City of Renton has authority under Renton Municipal Code Section 4-
4-130 to implement regulations regarding tree retention and removal; and
WHEREAS, the City of Renton Development Services Division issued a Director's Rule
in March 2006, which interprets the City's authority to regulate tree retention and removal; and
1
ORDINANCE NO. 5304
WHEREAS, the code amendments presented in this ordinance are intended to formalize
and codify the March 2006 Director' Rule;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. Section 4-4-070.D of Chapter 4, City-wide Property Development
Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of
General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
D. GENERAL LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS:
1. Street Frontage Landscaping Required: On-site landscaping is generally required along
all street frontages, with the exception of areas of pedestrian walkways and driveways.
2. Pervious Areas to Be Landscaped: Pervious areas, with the exception of critical areas,
shall have landscape treatment as appropriate. Landscaping may include hardscape such as
decorative paving, rock outcroppings, fountains, plant containers, etc.
3. Residential Rear/side YardlLandscaping Along Streets: When rear or side yards are
along property lines abutting a street, there shall be a minimum five-foot (50) planting area
in the public right-of-way. This will necessitate setting any future fencing back from the edge
of the right-or-way so that the landscaping is visible from the street. Landscaping is required
prior to occupancy. Maintenance of such areas shall be the responsibility of the property
owner(s). The maintenance requirement may necessitate provision ofa gate in the fence to
access the planting area.
4. Compliance with Zone Standards Required: See specific zone requirements listed in
chapter 4-2 RMC.
5. Parking Lot Landscaping Requirements: Parking lot landscaping requirements are
listed in RMC 4-4-080F7.
Trees shall be retained in accordance with RMC 4-4-130, Tree Retention and Land Clearing
Regulations.
6. Use of Existing Plant Material: Existing trees and other vegetation on the site of a
proposed development shall be used to augment new plantings to meet the requirements of
this section.
7. Use of Drought-Resistant Plants: Incorporation of drought-resistant plants into the
landscape is encouraged.
2
ORDINANCE NO. 5304
8. Avoidance of Hazards: All landscaping shall be planned in consideration of the public
health, safety, and welfare.
a, Landscaping shall not intrude within the clear vision area at driveways and street
intersections.
b. Trees planted near overhead power lines shall be species that will not eventually grow
into such lines,
c, Landscaping shall not obscure fire hydrants or access for emergency-response vehicles,
d. Avoid planting trees that may damage sidewalks.
9. Preservation of Uniqne Features: Unique features within the site shall be preserved and
incorporated into the site development design (such as significant vegetation and rock
outcroppings ).
10. Slopes: Stripping of vegetative slopes where harmful erosion and run-off will occur shall
be prohibited, The faces of cut and fill slopes shall be developed and maintained to control
against erosion. This control may consist of effective planting. The protection for the slopes
shall be initiated upon completion of grading and fully installed within thirty (30) days of
grading completion and prior to a request for final project approval. Where slopes are not
subject to erosion due to the erosion-resistant character of the materials such protection may
be omitted with the permission of the Public Works Department, provided that this protection
is not required by the rehabilitation plan.
11. Erosion Control Devices: Where necessary, check dams, cribbing, riprap or other
devices or methods shall be employed to control erosion and sediment, provide safety and
control the rate of water run-off,
12. Permanent Underground Irrigation System Required:
a, Underground irrigation systems shall be installed and maintained in good working
order in all landscaped areas of industrial, commercial, and multi-family development,
and landscaped common areas in single family subdivisions.
b. The irrigation system shall provide full water coverage of the planted areas as specified
in the plan.
c, The irrigation system maintenance program shall include scheduled procedures for
winterization.
d. Exceptions: Landscape plans featuring one hundred percent (100"10) drought tolerant
plants or landscaping already established without irrigation systems are exempt from
installation of permanent irrigation system, but drought tolerant proposals must provide
supplemental moisture by means of a City-approved temporary irrigation system for a
period not less than two (2) years. The applicant must provide a maintenance security
3
ORDINANCE NO. 5304
device for a period of three (3) years from the date of approval oflandscape installation
to ensure survival of plants.
SECTION II. Section 4-4-070.H of Chapter 4, City-wide Property Development
Standards, of Title N (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of
General Ordinances ofthe City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
H. AMENDED LANDSCAPING PLAN:
1. Modification of Landscape Plans: In the event there are significant physical elements
that are discovered after preliminary plan approval that may prevent installation of the
landscaping as proposed, the landscape plan may be modified upon request to the
Development Services Director. Such request must be accompanied by the following:
a. Copy of original, approved landscape plan.
b. An amendment plan meeting requirements ofRMC 4-8-120DI2, Landscape Plan,
detailed.
c. Narrative describing and justifying proposed changes.
d. Modified tree retention and land clearing plan for any protected trees proposed to be
removed in accordance with RMC 4-4-130 Tree Retention and Land Clearing
Regulations.
2. Acceptability of Requested Modifications: The plans may be approved, denied or
returned to the applicant with suggestions for changes that would make them acceptable.
3. Failure of Plan to Meet Intent: The Development Services Director may initiate
revisions to an approved landscape plan, prior to release of a surety device, if the installed
landscaping has failed to meet the intent of City landscape requirements.
SECTION ill. Section 4-4-130 of Chapter 4, City-wide Property Development
Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of
General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
4-4-130 TREE RETENTION AND LAND CLEARING REGULATIONS:
A.PURPOSE:
This Section provides regulations for the clearing ofland and the protection and preservation of
trees, shrubs, and groundcover plants. The purposes of these regulations are to:
4
ORDINANCE NO. 5304
1. Preserve and enhance the City's physical and aesthetic character by minimizing
indiscriminate removal or destruction of trees, shrubs, and ground cover;
2. Implement and further the goals and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan for the
environment, open space, wildlife habitat, vegetation, resources, surface drainage,
watersheds, and economics;
3. Promote land development practices that result in minimal adverse disturbance to existing
vegetation and soils within the City while at the same time recognizing that certain factors
such as condition (e.g., disease, danger offalling, etc.), proximity to existing and proposed
structures and improvements, interference with utility services, protection of scenic views,
and the realization of a reasonable enjoyment of property may require the removal of certain
trees and ground cover;
4. Minimize surface water and groundwater runoff and diversion, and aid in the stabilization
of soil, and to minimize erosion and sedimentation, and minimize the need for additional
storm drainage facilities caused by the destabilization of soils;
5. Retain clusters of trees for the abatement of noise and for wind protection, and to reduce
air pollution by producing pure oxygen from carbon dioxide.
(Ord. 5137,4-25-2005)
6. Protect trees during construction activities from damage to tree roots, trunks, and branches.
7. Recognize that trees increase real estate values.
B. APPLICABILITY:
The regulations of this Section apply to any property where land development or routine
vegetation management activities are undertaken. (Ord. 5137, 4-25-2005)
C. ALLOWED TREE REMOVAL ACTIVITIES:
Tree removal and associated use of mechanical equipment is permitted as follows, except as
provided in subsection D2 of this Section, Restrictions for Critical Areas, and in RMC 4-3-
110E5b, Urban Separator Overlay Regulations.
1. Emergency Situations: Removal of trees and/or ground cover by the City and/or public or
private utility in emergency situations involving immediate danger to life or property,
substantial fire hazards, or interruption of services provided by a utility.
2. Dead, Dangerons, or Diseased Trees: Removal of dead, terminally diseased, damaged, or
dangerous ground cover or trees which have been certified as such by a forester, registered
landscape architect, or certified arborist, selection of whom to be approved by the City based
on the type of information required, or the removal of which is approved by the City.
5
ORDINANCE NO. 5304
3. Maintenance ActivitieslEssential Tree Removal -Public or Private Utilities, Roads
and Public Parks: Maintenance activities including routine vegetation management and
essential tree removal for public and private utilities, road rights-of-way and easements, and
public parks.
4. InstaJlation of SEPA Exempt Public or Private Utilities: Installation of distribution
lines by public and private utilities; provided, that such activities are categorically exempt
from the provisions of the State Environmental Policy Act and RMC 4-9-070, Environmental
Review Procedures.
5. Existing and Ongoing Agricultural Activities: Clearing associated with existing and
ongoing agricultural activities as defined in chapter 4-11 RMC, Definitions.
6. Commercial Nurseries or Tree Farms: Removal of only those trees which are planted
and growing on the premises of a licensed retailer or wholesaler.
7. Public Road Expansion: Expansion of public roads, unless critical areas would be
affected, in which case see subsections C12 and C13 of this Section.
8. Site Investigative Work: Site investigative work necessary for land use application
submittals such as surveys, soil logs, percolation tests, and other related activities including
the use of mechanical equipment to perform site investigative work provided the work is
conducted in accordance with the following requirements:
a. Investigative work should not disturb any more than five percent (5%) of any protected
sensitive area described in subsection D2 of this Section, Restrictions for Critical Areas,
on the subject property. In every case, impacts shall be minimized and disturbed areas
restored.
b. In every location where site investigative work is conducted, disturbed areas shall be
minimized, and immediately restored.
c. A notice shall be posted on the site by the property owner or owner's agent indicating
that site investigative work is being conducted, and that the work must minimize
disturbance to the critical areas identified in subsection D2 of this Section, Restrictions
for Critical Areas.
d. No site investigative work shall commence without first notifying the Director or his or
her designee in advance.
9. Allowable Minor Tree Removal Activities: Except as provided in subsection D2 of this
Section, Restrictions for Critical Areas, tree removal and associated use of mechanical
equipment is permitted as follows:
a. No more than three (3) trees are removed in any twelve (12) month period from a
property under thirty five thousand (35,000) square feet in size; and
6
ORDINANCE NO, 5304
b, No more than six (6) trees are removed in any twelve (12) month period from a
property thirty five thousand (35,000) square feet and greater in size,
c. Rights-of-Way Unobstructed: In conducting minor tree removal activities, rights-of-
way shall not be obstructed unless a right-of-way use permit is obtained
10. Landscaping or Gardening Permitted: Land clearing in conformance with the
provisions of subsection C9, Allowed Minor Tree Removal Activities, and subsection D2 of
this Section, Restrictions for Critical Areas, is permitted for purposes of landscaping or
gardening; provided, that no mechanical equipment is used,
11. Operational Mining/Quarrying: Land clearing and tree removal associated with
previously approved, operational mining and quarrying activities.
12. Modification of Existing Utilities and Streets by Ten Percent (10%) or Less
13. Utilities, Traffic Control, Walkways, Bikeways Within Existing, Improved Right-of-
Way or Easements: Within existing improved public road rights-of-way or easements,
installation, construction, replacement, operation, overbuilding, or alteration of all natural
gas, cable, communication, telephone and electric facilities, lines, pipes, mains, equipment or
appurtenances, traffic control devices, illumination, walkways and bikeways. If activities
exceed the existing improved area or the public right-of-way, this exemption does not apply.
Restoration of disturbed areas shall be completed.
D. PROHIBITED ACTNITIES:
1. Prohibited Activities: There shall be no tree removal or land clearing on any site for the
sake of preparing that site for future development unless a land development permit, as
defined in RMC 4-8-120 D 12 for the site has been approved by the City.
2. Restrictions for Critical Areas -General: Unless exempted by critical areas, RMC 4-3-
050C5 or Shoreline Master Program regulations, RMC 4-3-090, no tree removal, or land
clearing, or ground cover management is permitted:
a. On portions of property with protected critical habitats, per RMC 4-3-050K; streams
and lakes, per RMC 4-3-050L: Shorelines of the State, per RMC 4-3-090, Renton
Shoreline Master Program Regulations; and wetlands, per RMC 4-3-050M; and their
associated buffers;
b. On protected slopes except as allowed in this Section or in the Critical Areas
Regulation, RMC 4-3-050; or
c, Areas classified as very high landslide hazards, except as allowed in this Section or in
the Critical Areas Regulations, RMC 4-3-050.
7
ORDINANCE NO. 5304
3. Restrictions for Native Growtb Protection Areas: Tree removal or land clearing shall
not be permitted within a Native Growth Protection Easement except as provided in the
established native growth protection area requirements ofRMC 4-3-050E4.
E. REVIEW AUTHORITY:
1. Authority and Interpretation: The Reviewing Official is hereby authorized and directed
to interpret and enforce all the provisions of this Section. He or she is authorized to require
retention above the minimum standards, to require phasing of tree retention plan, or to
require any other measures to meet the purpose of this section.
2. Independent Secondary Review: The Reviewing Official may require independent
review of any land use application that involves tree removal and land clearing at the City's
discretion. An evaluation by an independent qualified professional regarding the applicant's
analysis on the effectiveness of any proposed removal, retention, or replacement measures, to
include recommendations as appropriate. This review shall be paid for by the applicant and
the City shall select the third party review professional.
F. PERMITS REQUIRED:
1. Land Development Permit: An approved land development permit, as defined in RMC
4-8-120 D 12, is required in order to conduct tree removal or land clearing on any site for the
sake of preparing that site for future development.
2. Permit Required for Routine Vegetation Management on Undeveloped Properties:
Any person who performs routine vegetation management, as defined in RMC 4-11-180, on
undeveloped property in the City must obtain a routine vegetation management permit prior
to performing such work.
3. Permit Required to Use Mecbanical Equipment: Except where use of mechanical
equipment is specifically listed as exempt, any person who uses mechanical equipment for
routine vegetation management, land clearing, tree removal, landscaping, or gardening on
developed, partially developed or undeveloped property must obtain a routine vegetation
management permit prior to performing such work.
4. Timber Stand Maintenance -Conditional Use Pennit Required: While timber
harvesting shall not be permitted until such time as a valid land development is approved, a
request may be made for maintenance and thinning of existing timber stands to promote the
overall health and growth of the stand. Permits allowing maintenance and thinning beyond
the limits allowed in subsections subsection C9 of this Section, Allowable Minor Tree
Removal Activities, shall be considered as a conditional use permit by the Hearing Examiner
according to the following criteria in lieu of standard conditional use permit criteria:
a. Appropriate approvals have been sought and obtained with the State Department of
Natural Resources; and
8
ORDINANCE NO. 5304
b. The activity shall improve the health and growth of the stand and maintain long-tenn
alternatives for preservation of trees; and
c. The activity shall meet the provisions of subsections H2, Applicability, Performance
Standards and Alternates, and H3, General Review Criteria, of this Section; and
d. Thinning activities shall be limited to less than forty percent (40%) ofthe volume and
trees.
5. Tree Cutting -Solar Access or Pasture Land: A routine vegetation management permit
is required for tree cutting in greater amounts than specified under partially exempt actions in
subsection C9 of this Section, Allowable Minor Tree Cutting Activities, for any property
where tree cutting is proposed without an associated land development permit. A routine
vegetation management pennit may be issued allowing tree cutting only in the following
cases:
a. For purposes of allowing solar access to existing structures; or
b. To create pasture land where agricultural activities are pennitted uses in the zone.
Any tree cutting activities shall be the minimum necessary to accomplish the purpose, and
shall be consistent with subsection D2 of this Section, Restrictions for Critical Areas. (Ord.
5137,4-25-2005)
G. ROUTINE VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PERMIT REVIEW PROCESS:
Permits for routine vegetation management shall be processed consistent with RMC 4-9-195,
Routine Vegetation Management Permits. (Amd. Ord. 4963, 5-13-2002; Ord. 5137,4-25-2005)
H. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR LAND DEVELOPMENTIBUILDING
PERMITS:
1. Protected Trees-Retention Required: Trees shall be retained as follows:
a. Damaged and diseased trees excluded: Trees that are dangerous as defined in RMC 4-
2-210, or are safety risks due to root, trunk, or crown structure failure shall not be
counted as protected trees.
b. Residential:
i. RC, R-l, R-4 and R-8 wnes: Thirty percent (30"10) of the trees shall be retained in a
residential or institutional development.
ii. R-IO, R-14, RM-F, RM-T, RM-U and RMH: Ten percent (10%) of the trees shall
be retained in a residential or institutional development.
c. All other wnes: Five percent of the trees located on the lot shall be considered
protected and retained in commercial or industrial developments.
9
ORDINANCE NO. 5304
d. Utility uses and mineral extraction uses: such operations shall be exempt from the
protected tree retention requirements of this chapter if removal can be justified in writing
and approved by the Reviewing Official;
e. Replacement Requirements:
i. When the required number of protected trees cannot be retained, new trees, with a
two inch (2") caliper or greater, shall be planted. The replacement rate shall be
twelve (12) caliper inches of new trees to replace each protected tree removed;
ii. When a tree or tree cluster that is part of an approved tree retention plan cannot be
retained, mitigation shall be required per subsection i, above.
iii. Unless replacement trees are being used as part of an enhancement project in a
critical area or buffer, they shall not consist of any species listed in RMC 4-4-l30
H7d.
f Tree retention standards shall be applied to the net developable area. Land within
critical areas and their buffers, as well as public right-of-ways, shall be excluded from the
above calculation. If the number to be retained includes a fraction of a tree, any amount
equal to or greater than one-half tree (112) shall be rounded up;
2. Plan Required: When a land development permit, as defined in RMC 4-8-120 D 12, is
submitted to the City it shall be accompanied by a tree removal and land clearing plan.
3. Applicability, Performance Standards and Alternates: All land clearing and tree
removal activities shall conform to the criteria and performance standards set forth in this
Section unless otherwise recommended in an approved soil engineering, engineering
geology, hydrology or forest management plan and where the alternate procedures will be
equal to or superior in achieving the policies of this Section. All land clearing and tree
removal activities may be conditioned to ensure that the standards, criteria, and purpose of
this Section are met.
4. General Review Criteria: All land clearing and tree removal activities shall comply with
RMC 4-4-060 Grading, Excavation, and Mining Regulations, and shall meet the following
criteria:
a. The land clearing and tree removal will not create or contribute to landslides,
accelerated soil creep, settlement and subsidence or hazards associated with strong
ground motion and soil liquefaction.
b. The land clearing and tree removal will not create or contribute to flooding, erosion, or
increased turbidity, siltation or other form of pollution in a watercourse.
c. Land clearing and tree removal will be conducted to maintain or provide visual
screening and buffering between land uses of differing intensity, consistent with
applicable landscaping and setback provisions of the Renton Municipal Code.
10
ORDINANCE NO, 5304
d, Land clearing and tree removal shall be conducted so as to expose the smallest
practical area of soil to erosion for the least possible time, consistent with an approved
build-out schedule and including any necessary erosion control measures,
e, Land clearing and tree removal shall be consistent with subsection D2 of this Section,
Restrictions for Critical Areas, and IUvlC 4-3-050, Critical Areas Regulations,
f Retained trees will not create or contribute to a hazardous condition as the result of
blowdown, insect or pest infestation, disease, or other problems that may be created as a
result of selectively removing trees and other vegetation from a lot.
g. Land clearing and tree removal shall be conducted to maximize the preservation of any
tree in good health that is an outstanding specimen because of its size, form, shape, age,
color, rarity, or other distinction as a community landmark,
5. Timing: The City may restrict the timing of the land clearing and tree removal activities to
specific dates and/or seasons when such restrictions are necessary for the public health,
safety and welfare, or for the protection of the environment.
6. Restrictions for Critical Areas: See subsection D2 of this Section, Restrictions for
Critical Areas -General, and RMC 4-3-050, Critical Areas Regulations.
7. Tree/Ground Cover Reteution: The following measures may be used by the Reviewing
Official in conditioning a land development permit or building permit proposal, to comply
with the general review criteria of subsection H4:
a. Trees shall be maintained to the maximum extent feasible on the property where they
are growing. The Reviewing Official may require modification of the tree retention and
land clearing plan, or the associated land development permits, to ensure the retention of
the maximum number of trees,
b, The Reviewing Official may require the applicant to replace trees, provide interim
erosion control, hydroseed exposed soils, or other similar conditions which would
implement the intent of this Section,
c, Trees that shelter interior trees or trees on abutting properties from strong winds that
could otherwise cause them to blow down should be retained.
d. Except in critical areas or their buffers, unless enhancement activities are being
performed, the removal of trees on the following list should be allowed in order to avoid
invasive root systems, weak wood prone to breakage, or varieties which tend to harbor
insect pests:
i. All Populus species including cottonwood (populus trichocarpa), quaking aspen
(populus tremuloides), lombardy poplar (populus nigra "Italica"), etc,
ii. All Alnus species which includes red alder (Alnus oregona), black alder (Alnus
glutinosa), white alder (Alnus rhombi folia), etc,
II
ORDINANCE NO. 5304
iii. Salix species which includes weeping willow (Salix babylonica), etc.
iv. All Platanus species which include London plane tree (platanus acerifolia),
American sycamore, buttonwood (platanus occidentalis), etc.
8. Protection Measures During Construction: Protection measures in this subsection shall
apply for all trees that are to be retained in areas subject to construction. All of the following
tree protection measures shall apply:
a. Construction storage prohibited: The applicant may not fill, excavate, stack or store any
equipment, dispose of any materials, supplies or fluids, operate any equipment, install
impervious surfaces, or compact the earth in any way within the area defined by the drip line
of any tree to be retained.
b. Fenced protection area required: The applicant shall erect and maintain six-foot-high
chain link temporary construction fencing around the drip lines of all retained trees, or along
the perimeter of a stand of retained trees. . Placards shall be placed on fencing every fifty
feet (SO') indicating the words, "NO TRESPASSING-Protected Trees" or on each side of
the fencing ifless than fifty feet (SO'). Site access to individually protected trees or groups
of trees shall be fenced and signed. Individual trees shall be fenced on four sides. In
addition, the applicant shall provide supervision whenever equipment or trucks are moving
near trees.
c. Protection from grade changes: If the grade level adjoining to a tree to be retained is to be
raised, the applicant shall construct a dry rock wall or rock well around the tree. The
diameter of this wall or well must be equal to the tree's drip line.
d. Impervious surfaces prohibited within the drip line: The applicant may not install
impervious surface material within the area defined by the drip line of any tree to be
retained.
e. Restrictions on grading within the drip lines of retained trees: The grade level around any
tree to be retained may not be lowered within the greater of the following areas: (1) the area
defined by the drip line of the tree, or (2) an area around the tree equal to one and a half feet
(1 W) in diameter for each one inch of tree caliper. The Reviewing Official may require a
larger tree protection zone based on tree size, speci es, soil, or other conditions.
f Mulch layer required: All areas within the required fencing shall be covered completely
and evenly with a minimum ofthree inches (3") of bark mulch prior to installation of the
protective fencing. Exceptions may be approved by the Reviewing Official if the mulch will
adversely affect protected groundcover plants.
g. Monitoring required during construction: The applicant shall retain a professional arborist
or other qualified professional to prune branches and roots, fertilize, and water as
appropriate for any trees and ground cover which are to be retained. (Ord. 5137, 4-25-2005)
h Alternative protection: Alternative safeguards may be used if determined by the
Reviewing Official to provide equal or greater tree protection.
12
ORDINANCE NO. 5304
9. Maintenance
a. All retained trees, including protected trees, shall be maintained for at least five years
from the date of the final land development permit issued for the project;
b. All retained trees and vegetation shall be pruned and trimmed to maintain a healthy
growing condition or to prevent limb failure;
c. With the exception of dead, diseased, or damaged trees specifically retained to provide
wildlife habitat; dangerous trees as defined in RMC 4-1-210, or stolen trees shall be
replaced within three months or during the next planting season if the loss does not occur in
a planting season;
I. VARIANCE PROCEDURES:
The Reviewing Official shall have the authority to grant variances from the provisions of this
Section pursuant to RMC 4-8-070H and the decision criteria in RMC 4-9-250. (Ord. 5137,4-25-
2005)
J. VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES:
1. Penalties: Penalties for any violation of any of the provisions of this Section shall be in
accord with RMC 1-3-2. In a prosecution under this Section, each tree removed, damaged or
destroyed will constitute a separate violation, and the monetary penalty for each violation
shall be no less than the minimum penalty, and no greater than the maximum penalty of
RMC 1-3-2D.
2. Additional Liability for Damage: In addition, any person who violates any provision of
this Section or of a permit issued pursuant thereto shall be liable for all damages to public or
private property arising from such violation, including the cost of restoring the affected area
to its condition prior to such violation.
3. Restoration Required: The City may require replacement of all improperly removed
ground cover with species similar to those which were removed or other approved species
such that the biological and habitat values will be replaced. Restoration shall include
installation and maintenance of interim and emergency erosion control measures that shall be
required as determined by the City.
4. Replacement Required: The City may require, for each tree that was improperly cut
and/or removed in violation of, or without, an approved tree retention and land clearing plan,
replacement planting of a tree of equal size, quality and species or up 18 caliper inches of
trees of the same species in the immediate vicinity of the tree(s) that was/were removed. The
replacement trees will be of sufficient caliper to adequately replace the lost tree(s) , and at a
minimum of two inches 2") in caliper.
13
ORDINANCE NO. 5304
5. Stop Work: For any parcel on which trees and/or ground cover are improperly removed
and subject to penalties under this Section, the City shall stop work on any existing permits
and halt the issuance of any or all future permits or approvals until the property is fully
restored in compliance with this Section and all penalties are paid. (Ord. 4219, 6-5-1989;
Amd. Ord. 4835, 3-27-2000; Ord. 5137,4-25-2005)
SECTION IV. Section 4-7-130C of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV
(Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the
City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
C ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS:
A plat, short plat, subdivision or dedication shall be prepared in conformance with the
following provisions:
1. Land Unsuitable for Subdivision: Land which is found to be unsuitable for subdivision
includes land with features likely to be harmful to the safety and general health of the future
residents (such as lands adversely affected by flooding, steep slopes, or rock formations).
Land which the Department or the Hearing Examiner considers inappropriate for subdivision
shall not be subdivided unless adequate safeguards are provided against these adverse
conditions.
a. FloodinglInundation: If any portion of the land within the boundary of a preliminary plat
is subject to flooding or inundation, that portion of the subdivision must have the approval of
the State according to chapter 86.16 RCW before the Department and the Hearing Examiner
shall consider such subdivision.
b. Steep Slopes: A plat, short plat, subdivision or dedication which would result in the
creation of a lot or lots that primarily have slopes forty percent (40"/0) or greater as measured
per RMC 4-3-05OJIa, without adequate area at lesser slopes upon which development may
occur, shall not be approved. (Amd. Ord. 4835, 3-27-2000)
2. Native Growth Protection Area Easement and Minimum Lot Size: Native growth
protection area easements may be included in the minimum lot size of lots created through
the subdivision process; provided, that the area of the lot outside of the easement is sufficient
to allow for adequate buildable area and yards. (Ord. 4835, 3-27-2000)
3. Land Clearing and Tree Retention: Shall comply with RMC 4-4-130 Tree Retention and
Land Clearing.
4. Streams:
a. Preservation: Every reasonable effort shall be made to preserve existing streams, bodies
of water, and wetland areas.
14
ORDINANCE NO. 5304
b. Method: Ifa stream passes through any of the subject property, a plan shall be presented
which indicates how the stream will be preserved. The methodologies used should include an
overflow area, and an attempt to minimize the disturbance of the natural channel and stream
bed.
c. Culverting: The piping or tunneling of water shall be discouraged and allowed only when
going under streets.
d. Clean Water: Every effort shall be made to keep all streams and bodies of water clear of
debris and pollutants. (Amd. Ord. 4835, 3-27-2000)
SECTION V. Table 4-8-120A of Chapter 8, Permits-General and Appeals, of Title IV
(Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the
City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as shown on Attachment' A'.
SECTION VI. Table 4-8-120B of Chapter 8, Pennits-General and Appeals, of Title IV
(Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the
City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as shown on Attachment 'B'.
SECTION VII. Table 4-8-120C of Chapter 8, Pennits-General and Appeals, of Title IV
(Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the
City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as shown on Attachment 'C'.
SECTION VIIl. The definition of "Grading Plan" in Section 4-8-120D(7) of Chapter 8,
Permits-General and Appeals, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260
entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to
read as follows:
Grading Plan: A twenty two inch by thirty four inch (22" x 34") plan drawn by a State of
Washington licensed landscape architect at a scale of one inch to forty feet (1" to 40')
(horizontal feet) and one inch to ten feet (I" to 10') (vertical feet) (or other size plan sheet or
scale approved by the Development Service Division Plan Review Supervisor) clearly
indicating the following:
a. Graphic scale and north arrow.
b. Dimensions of all property lines, easements, and abutting streets,
15
ORDINANCE NO. 5304
c. Location and dimension of all on-site structures and the location of any structures
within fifteen feet (15') of the subject property or which may be affected by the proposed
work,
d. Accurate existing and proposed contour lines drawn a five foot (5'), or less, intervals
showing existing ground and details of terrain and area drainage to include surrounding
off-site contours within one hundred feet (100') of the site,
e. Location of natural drainage system, including perennial and intermittent streams, the
presence of bordering vegetation, and flood plains.
f Setback areas and any areas not be disturbed, including the location, size and species of
all protected trees on site. Protected trees shall have the approximate drip line shown.
The method of tree protection during grading and construction shall be shown. If grade
changes in the vicinity of the protected trees are necessary, the method of reconciling the
drip line with the finished elevation shall be included (see RMC 4-4-130 Tree Retention
and Land Clearing Regulations);
g. Finished contours drawn at five foot (5') intervals as a result of grading,
h. Proposed drainage channels and related construction with associated underground
st9rm lines sized and connections shown, and
i. General notes addressing the following (may be listed on the cover sheet):
i. Area in square feet of the entire property.
ii. Area of work in square feet.
iii. Both the number of tons and cubic yards of soil to be added, removed, or
relocated.
iv. Type and location of fill origin, and destination of any soil to be removed from
site.
v. Finished floor elevation(s) of all structures, existing and proposed.
SECTION IX. The definition of "Landscaping Plan, Conceptual" in Section 4-8-120D(12)
of Chapter 8, Permits-General and Appeals, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of
Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is
hereby amended to read as follows:
Landscaping Plan, Conceptual: A fully dimensioned plan, prepared by a landscape
architect registered in the State of Washington, a certified nurseryman, or other similarly
16
ORDINANCE NO. 5304
qualified professional, drawn at the same scale as the project site plan (or other scale
approved by the Reviewing Official), clearly indicating the following:
a. Date, graphic scale, and north arrow,
b. Location of proposed buildings, parking areas, access and existing buildings to remain,
c. Names and locations of abutting streets and public improvements, including .easements,
d. Existing and proposed contours at five foot (50) intervals or less,
e. Location, size, and purpose of planting areas, including those required in RMC 4-4-070
Landscaping;
f. Location and height for proposed berming,
g. Location and elevations for any proposed landscape-related structures such as arbors,
gazebos, fencing, etc.,
h. Location, size, spacing and names of existing and proposed shrubs, trees, ground
covers, and decorative rockery or like landscape improvements in relationship to
proposed and existing utilities, (Ord. 5100, 11-1-2004)
i. The location, size and species of all protected trees on site. Protected trees shall have
the approximate drip line shown (see RMC 4-4-130 Tree Retention and Land Clearing
Regulations) .
SECTION X. The definition of "Landscaping Plan, Detailed" in Section 4-8-120D(l2) of
Chapter 8, Permits-General and Appeals, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance
No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby
amended to read as follows:
Landscaping Plan, Detailed: A fully dimensioned plan, prepared by a landscape architect
registered in the State of Washington, a certified nurseryman, or other similarly qualified
professional, drawn at the same scale as the project site plan (or other scale approved by the
Reviewing Official), clearly indicating the following:
a. Date, graphic scale, and north arrow,
b. Location of proposed buildings, property lines, walks, parking areas, and access, and
existing buildings to remain,
c. Names and locations of abutting streets and public improvements, including easements,
d. Existing and proposed contours at five-foot (50) intervals or less,
17
ORDINANCE NO. 5304
e. Detailed grading plan,
f. Location,dimensions, and purpose of all planting areas (the width of a landscaping area
when curbed shall be measured from inside to inside of the curbs)including those
required in RMC 4-4-070 Landscaping;
g. Location and height for proposed berming,
h. Locations, elevations, and details for any proposed landscape-related structures such as
arbors, gazebos, fencing, etc.,
i. Location, size, spacing and names of existing and proposed shrubs, trees, ground
covers, and decorative rockery or like landscape improvements in relationship to
proposed and existing utilities,
j. The location, size and species of all protected trees on site. Protected trees shall have
the approximate drip line shown (see RMC 4-4-130 Tree Retention and Land Clearing
Regulations).
k. Names of existing and proposed vegetation, and
1. Detailed planting plan (soil mix, planting depth and width, and bark mulch depth).
(Ord. 5100, 11-1-2004)
SECTION XI. The definition of "Tree Cutting/Land Clearing (Tree Inventory) Plan" in
Section 4-8-l20D(21) of Chapter 8, Permits-General and Appeals, of Title IV (Development
Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton,
Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
Tree RetentionlLand Clearing (Tree Inventory) Plan: A completed Tree Retention
Worksheet accompanied by a full dimensional plan, drawn by a professional arborist,
landscape architect, or other similarly qualified professional, based on finished grade, drawn
at the same scale as the project site plan with the northern property line at the top of the paper
clearly showing the following:
a. All property boundaries and adjacent streets,
b. Location of all areas proposed to be cleared,
c. Species and sizes of vegetation to be removed, altered or retained andthe boundaries
and predominant species of stands of trees consisting offive (5) or more trees. This
requirement applies only to trees, six inch (6") caliper, and larger fifty-four inches (54")
above grade, and the location, size and species of all protected trees on the site.
18
ORDINANCE NO. 5304
d. Future building sites and drip lines of any trees which will overhang/overlap a
construction line, and
e. Location and dimensions of rights-of-way, utility lines, fire hydrants, street lighting,
and easements.
f Where the drip line of a tree overlaps an area where construction activities will occur,
this shall be indicated on the plan.
g. For allowed activities, including allowed exemptions, modifications, and variances,
show all trees proposed to be removed in priority tree retention areas: slopes twenty five
percent (25%) to thirty nine percent (39"10), high or very high landslide areas, and high
erosion hazard areas.
h. Show trees to be removed in protected critical areas: wetlands, Shorelines of the State,
streams and lakes, floodways, floodplain slopes forty percent (40%) or greater, very high
landslide hazard areas, and critical habitat if the activity is exempt or allowed by the
critical areas regulations in RMC 4-3-050C5, Specific Exemptions.
i. Show all trees to be retained in critical area buffers.
j. In all other areas of the site, trees to be removed may be indicated generally with
clearing limit lines except for protected trees. The location, size, and species of all
protected trees on a site shall be shown. The plan shall also show the planned
replacement trees in accordance with RMC 4-4-130-Hle and any planned replanting
areas in accordance with RMC 4-4-130-Hlf (Amd. Ord. 4963,5-13-2002; Ord. 5137,
4-25-2005)
SECTION XII. Section 4-9-195 of Chapter 9, Permits-Specific, of Title IV (Development
Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton,
Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
4-9-195 ROUTINE VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PERMITS:
A. PURPOSE:
This Section provides a permit process for routine vegetation management implementing the tree
retention and land clearing regulations in RMC 4-4-130.
B. AUTHORITY:
The City's Development Services Division Director, or his duly authorized representative, is
hereby authorized and directed to interpret and enforce all the provisions of this Section.
19
ORDINANCE NO. 5304
C. APPLICABILITY, EXEMPTIONS, AND PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES:
1. General Applicability: The regulations of this Section apply to any developed, partially
developed or undeveloped property where routine vegetation management activities are
undertaken.
a. Permit Required for Routine Vegetation Management on Undeveloped
Properties: Any person who performs routine vegetation management on undeveloped
property in the City must obtain a routine vegetation management permit prior to
performing such work.
b. Permit Required to Use Mechanical Equipment: Except where use of mechanical
equipment is specifically listed as exempt, any person who uses mechanical equipment
for routine vegetation management, land clearing, tree removal, landscaping, or
gardening on developed, partially developed or undeveloped property must obtain a
routine vegetation management permit prior to performing such work.
c. Tree Removal-Solar Access or Pasture Land: A routine vegetation management
permit is required for tree removal in greater amounts than specified under partially
exempt actions in RMC 4-4-130C, Allowable Tree Removal Activities, for any property
where tree removal is proposed without an associated land development permit. A routine
vegetation management permit may be issued allowing tree removal only in the following
cases:
i. For purposes of allowing solar access to existing structures; or
ii. To create pasture land where agricultural activities are permitted uses in the zone.
Any tree removal activities shall be the minimum necessary to accomplish the purpose,
and shall be consistent with RMC 4-4-130D2, Restrictions for Critical Areas.
2. Exemptions: Refer to RMC 4-4-130C.
3. Prohibited Activities: Refer to RMC 4-4-BOD.
D. PROCEDURES AND REVIEW CRITERIA:
Permits for routine vegetation management shall be processed as follows:
1. Submittal: An application for a routine vegetation management permit shall be submitted
to the Development Services Division together with any necessary fees as required in chapter
4-1 RMC.
2. Information Required: A routine vegetation management permit application shall
contain the information requested in RMC 4-8-120, Submittal Requirements -Specific to
Application Type.
20
ORDINANCE NO. 5304
3. Time: The permit shall be reviewed administratively within a reasonable period of time.
4. Routine Vegetation Management Permit Conditions: The routine vegetation
management permit may be denied or conditioned by the City to restrict the timing and
extent of activities in order to further the intent of this Section including:
a. Preserve and enhance the City's aesthetic character and maintain visual screening and
buffering.
b. Preserve habitat to the greatest extent feasible.
c. Prevent landslides, accelerated soil creep, settlement and subsidence hazards.
d. Minimize the potential for flooding, erosion, or increased turbidity, siltation or other
form of pollution in a watercourse.
e. Ensure that the proposal will be consistent with RMC 4-4-130D2, Restrictions for
Critical Areas, and D3, Restrictions for Native Growth Protection Areas -Routine
Vegetation Management Permits.
f Ensure that protected trees are retained, consistent with RMC 4-4-130 H.
5. Time Limits for Routine Vegetation Management Permits: Any permit for routine
vegetation management shall be valid for one year from the date of issuance. An extension
may be granted by the Development Services Division for a period of one year upon
application by the property owner or manager. Application for such an extension must be
made at least thirty (30) days in advance of the expiration of the original permit and shall
include a statement of justification for the extension.
E.APPEALS:
Appeal of the decision to grant, grant with conditions, or deny a routine vegetation management
permit shall be made consistent with RMC 4-8-110, Appeals.
F. VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES:
Unless otherwise specified, violations of this Section are misdemeanors subject to RMC 1-3-1.
(Ord. 4963, 5-13-2002; Ord. 5159,10-17-2005)
SECTION XIII. The definition of "Tree" in Section 441-210 of Chapter II, Definitions, of
Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
21
ORDINANCE NO. 5304
TREE: A self-supporting woody plant characterized by one main trunk having a caliper of two
inches (2") or greater, or, for certain species, a multi-stemmed trunk system with a definitely
formed crown, with a potential minimum height often feet (10') at maturity.
a. Tree, dangerous: Any tree that has been certified as dead, terminally diseased,
damaged, or otherwise dangerous, by a professional forester, licensed landscape architect,
or certified arborist.
SECTION XIV. The definition of "Tree Cutting" in Section 4-11-210 of Chapter 11,
Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of
General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
TREE REMOVAL: The actual removal of the above ground plant material of a tree through
chemical, manual or mechanical methods.
SECTION XV.
after publication.
This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, an~ys (!i!!J
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 17 th day of._--.!:S~eJ:.p.:::te~m:!.!b~e~r_-" 2007.
Bonnie Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 17th day of September ,2007
Approved as to form:
~~~~
ORD.1370:09/06/07:ch
Date of Publication: 9/22/2007 (summary)
22
ATTACHMENT A
TABLE 4-8-120A
TYPE OF APPLICA TIONIPERMIT
SUBMITTAL Utility Stonnwatcr Roadway Combined APA APA
REQUIREMENTS Construct-Construct-Construct-Pennit Operat-Closure
ion Pennit ion Permit ion Pennit (Includes iog Permit
(Sewer Plats) Permit
and/or
Water)
Closure Permit I (b)
Application Form
Construction Permit I I I 2
Application Form
Construction Mitigation 3 3 3 4
Description
Drainage Plans 3 3 3
Drainage Report 2 2 2
Erosion Control Plan 3 3 3 3
(Temporary)
Geotechnical Report 3 2 I 2
Grading Plans 3 3 4
Hazardous Materials I(b) I(b) I(b) I(b)
Management Statement
Neighborhood Detail 3 3 3 3
Map
Operating Pennit I
Application
Roadway Construction 3 3
Plans
Source Statement, Fill I (b) I(b) I(b) I (b)
Material
-
Stream or Lake Study I(e) I(e) I (c) I(e)
Street Lighting Plans 3 3
A-I
ATI ACHMENT A
Topography Map
Tree t -"
Rett.'l1tionlInventorylLand
Clearing Plan-Approved
Utilities Plans-
Engineered
Wetlands Assessment
rable 4-8-120A Legend:
3 3 3 4
3 3 3 3 . .... -............ .... .. .... ", .. .... -
3 3 3 4
I (a) 1 (a) 1 (a) I(a)
The number of copies required (if any) is indicated for each type
of application and each submittal requirement) unless waived by
the Development Services Division Plan Review Supervisor.
Waiver of aquifer permit submittal requirements may be granted
by the Water Utility.
(a) Required when wetlands are present oD-site
(b) Required when project is located in Zones 1 or 2 of an aquifer protection area
( c) A standard stream or lake study is required for any application proposal. A supplemental
study is required if an unclassified stream is involved, or if there are proposed alterations
of the water body or buffer
A-2
---Deleted: Cutting I
ATTACHMENTB
TABLE 4-8-120 B
TYPE OF APPLICATIONIPERMIT
SUBMITTAL Demoli Grading Manufact Manufact Multi-Commercial/In Pool! Si Single Singl
REQIDREMENTS tion IFill ured ured Family/Com dustrial Spa gn FamilylD e
Home in Home mercial Interior uplex Famil
Manufact Outside Industrial Remodel New or y/
ured of New or Additions Multi
Home Manufact Additions -
Park ured Famil
Home y
Park Interi I
I
or
Remo·
I del
Applicant Agreement 3
Statement (for
i wireless
c01l11nunications i facilities only)
Application Form, I 2 i I I 2 I I 1 I I
Building Division i I
Application Form, 2 2
Construction Permit
Architectural 5 2
Elevations
Architectural Plans, 4 3(n)
Commercial/Industria
I!Attached DweUings
3+ Units
Architectural Plans, 2 2
DetachedlSemi-
Attached DweUings
and 2 Attached
B-1
ATIACHMENT B
Dwellings
Blocking! Anchoring! 2
Skirting Details
Construction I 2
Mitigation
Description
Drainage Plans 2 5 2 (h)
Drainage Reports 2
Electrical Plans 2 2 I(g)
Energy Code I(m) I
Checklist,
Nonresidential
Energy Code I(k) I I (a)
Checklist, Residential
Foundation Plans 2 4 2 2
Geotechnical Report 2(h) 4 2(b)
Grading Plan 5 5
Grading Work 4 2
Description
Hazardous Materials 2 (0) 2 (0) 2 (0) 2 (0) 2 (0) 2 (0) 2 (0)
Management
Statement
Heat Loss I(c) I(c)
Calculation
Installer Certification I
Inventory of Existing 3
Sites (for wireless
communications
facilities only)
Irrigation Sprinkler 3
Plans
King Comly Health I(t) I(t) I(g)
Department -
B-2
ATTACHMENTB
Approved Plans
Land Use Permit 2 2 2 I
Conditions,
Approved (if anv)
Landscape Plan, 4
Detailed
Lease Agreement, 3
Draft (for wireless
communication
facilities onlv)
Manufacturer's Plans 2
Mechanical Plans 3 2
Plwnbing Plans 2(ro) 2
Project Information 2 2 2 5 3(n) 2 2 2
Sheet (includes legal
description
Receipt for 2 I (h)
Construction (Utility)
Permit Application
Roadway 2
Construction Plan I I
Screening Detail, 3
I Refuse/Recycling
Service Area Map . 3 I
(for wireless
communication
facilities onlv)
Side Sewer Capping I
Permit, Finaled
Sign Plan 3
Site Plan, 5 I
Commercial,
Industrial, Multi-
B-3
ATTACHMENTB
Family
Site Plan, Sign 2
Site Plan, Single 2 2 2(d)
Family/ Duplex
Source Statement, 2(P) 2(P) 2(P) 2(P) 2(P) 2(P)
Fill material, Aquifer
Protection Areas
Structural 2 3 2(e) 2(g) 2
Calculations
Structural Plans 2 3 2(e) 2(g) 2
Topography Map 2 2 2 4
(may be combined
with site plan or
grading plan)
Tree. Retention/Land .... 2 . I
3 ... ~(d) .
Clearing Plan,
...
Approved
Utilities Construction 6 I
Plans
Water/Sewer I (j) (k)
Availability Letter
Water Service I
Disconnect Request
(fInal)
WSEC Trade-Off
Form
The number of copies (if any) is indicated in each column unless waived by the Development Services DlVlslOn.
Table 4-8-120B Legend:
a. Required for any alteration of exterior of (heated) building envelope.
b. When required by Section 1804 (Foundations and Retaining Walls) of the UBC.
c. Required for installation of a new furnace or a replacement of greater size.
d. Not required for pools/spaslhot tubs to be installed within and existing building.
e. Required for structural changes only.
B-4
2
2(P)
2(i)
2Ul
2
..-._ ..• •.• {o;;J~d: Cutting .~
I (j) I (a)(j
)
1(1)
ATTACHMENT B
f. Required for food service establisiuuents only,
g, Required for public pools/spas/hot tubs (not required for single family or duplex pools/spas/hot tubs),
h. Required for duplexes only,
i. Required for other than conventional construction.
j. Required only if trade-off option is being used for compliance.
k. For multi-family, one per building.
1. Not required for additions.
m. Not required for multi-family projects.
n. For restaurants and any construction project involving work in the right-of-way, four (4) copies are required.
0, Required only when project is located in Aquifer Protection Area and (1) construction vehicles will be refueled on site and/or
(2) the quantity of hazardous materials that will be stored, dispensed, used, and handled on the construction site, exclusive of
the quantity of hazardous materials contained in fuel or fluid reservoirs of construction vehicles will exceed twenty (20)
gallons. Weight of solid hazardous materials will be converted to volumes for purposes of determining whether de minimis
amount is exceeded. Ten (10) pounds shall be considered equal to one gallon.
p. Required only when project is located in an Aquifer Protection Area.
B-5
il'ag'-~~i~ "1i:"'"[0~ ~"'g ~ .. z-SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS ..,
.0' ~.~§[ 'I:l iO&e. .... g-" .°0
~ ["h i Iii' .. CI R'* i" .. Ii" ~ g" " ~ o· ~~. So ~ 5--I! 8 ~
l"l
~-Annexation (100/. Nolia: of Intlml) ~ 1"
'" ~-Annexation (60% Petition) • ....
l"l ..
A_I 0 ~ n
BuSinCSll License for Home Occupation! ~ Compo Plan Map AmendmeotIRezone
Compo Plan Text Amendment
I
(")
n
Conditional Approval Pennit for a Nonconfonrung Structure ~ Conditional Approval Pennit for a Nonconfonning Use
~ ConditionaL Use Permit (Administrative) ~
~ ConditionaL Use Permit (Hearing Examiner) ~
~ Environmental Review ~ Environmental Review (Nonproject) ..,
Grade Ilnd Fill Permit (Special)
Kennel License
KenDel License, Hobby
Lot Line Adjustment
Master Site Plan (Overall)
Master Site Pian (Individual Phases)
\l .... Mobile Home Park. Preliminary
Mobile Home Park, Fillal
Modificatiow'Altemate Request
Plat, Final
~ Plat, PreliminarylBinding Site Plan
PUD, Preliminary
~ PUD, Final
Rebuild Approval Permit for II Nonconforming Structure
Rebuild Approval Permit for a Nonconfonning Use
Rezone
Routine Vegetation Management Pennil
Shoreline Exemption
Sboreline Substantial Development Pennit
Sboreline Conditional Use Pennit
Sboreline Variance
~ Sbort Pial, Preliminary
Sbort Plat, Final/ Binding Site Plan
Site Plan Revie<N
Special Permit
~ Tempor"ry Use Permit
Variance
Waiver
Wetland Permit
ATTACHMENTC
Applicant' 5 5 5 5 ,
COnImnat
ion of
COJJ.dition
Complian
'" Applic:atio , , , , , , , , , , , , x , , , , x , x , , x , , , , , ,
n Fee per
RMC 4~1·
170
Assessme 1 1
nt
Infonnatio
n
Authorizat 5
ion for
Abatcwen
t
BiPding
Site Plan
Mon
Business 1
License
AppJicatio
n for
Home
Occupatio
n
Calculatio 3 3 3 3
ns, Survey
Colored 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Display ,
:>V1aps I
-
Constructi 5 5 , 5 5 , 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
on i
HltigatWll
I
,
Dt:scnpllo I
n
~-I-
,
Dn'" I 4 4 4
I
4
Deed for
Any
Proposed ,
Dedicatio
n of Land
for Public
Purposes
C-2
ATTACHMENT C
Dnft 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Homconw
='
Associatio
n
Document
,n
I applicable
Dnft 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Restrictuv ,
Covenants
, ifany
Drainage 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 , 5 5
coptrol
Phon
Drnmag, 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
R,pm'
ElevatioDS 5 5 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 , \
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0
Arcbitectu
'" Elevations 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
, Gnutin,
EnvHonm \ 1 1 1 1 1 1 \ 1 1 1 \ \ \ 1 1 1 \ \ 1
"' .. \ 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cb,ddm
Existing 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 l 5 5 5 5 5 l 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 ,
Covenants
(=mIod
oo,y)
Existing 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 , , , , 5 5 5 5 5 ...,""""
I ;::;"'"
Final Plat 5
Phm
Flood \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ \ 1 \ \ \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ \
H=d 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Doto, if
I anolicable
Flom , , 5 5 5 5 5 , 5 5 5 5 5 5
Phm,
Gcotcclmi 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 , 5 5 5 5 5 , 5
cal Report
C-3
ATTACHM:ENT C
Grading I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I
Plan, 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cooceptua
, ,
I
Grading 1 I
Phm. 2 2
Detailed
Habitat I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I I I
DM, 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
ReDort
Hazardous ! 4
Materials I
Managem
~t
Stalement
Invenlory 5 5 5
or
Existing
Sites (for
wireless
commUOlC
ation
facilities)
Iustificati I I
on for the 2 2
CompTche
llslve Plan
Amendme
ntand, if
applicable
, Rezone
lustificati 5
on for the
I Comlitlon
W ,
Approval , I
Perml! I
(nonconfo
i ruling ,
structure)
Justificati 5
on fOl'the
Condition
W
Approval
Pennit
(nou.confo
nninv;use)
C-4
ATTACHMENT C
Justificati 1 1
cnfor 2 2
Condition
a1 Permit """"',
Justificati l
on for tbc
Rdnrild
Approval
Pomril
(nonconfo
:="..)
Justificati l
on for tbe
RdnriId
ApprovaJ
Permit
(nonconfo mu .. , .. ,,,,)
Justificati 1
lin fin 2
R=~
Justifacati 1
on for 0
=~e
KID, J
Conn"
Assessor's
M",
Indicating
Site
""'''-' l l l l l l l l l l l
PInn
C_
I
Land>oope l l l l l , l
PInn
DeWkd
Le... l l l
A&reem~
t, """ (f~
wireless
communic
alion
facilities)
C-5
ATTACHMENTC
Log" 1 1 1 1 5 , 1 1 1 1 , , , , , , 1 , 1 , 5 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 ,
Descriptio 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 2
n
Lotte< ,
Descnbin
g
Proposed
Home
Occupatio
n
Letter 5
from
Property
Own"
Letter-to ,
Examiner!
Council
Stating
Reason(s)
for Appeal
".. RMC
4-8-110C3
Lctt" 1
Explainin 2
g Wbich
comprehe
nSLve Plan
Texul'olic
ies Should
bo I
Changed I and Whv ,
Lotte< of 5 5 5 ~ 5 5 5 5
!
5 , 5 5 5 5 5 , 5 5 5 ! 5 5 ,
Un\knt~n
,
I
I
ding, I
I
I
Gculogto.: ,
i Risk
list of 2 , -
I I
Affected ,
Property
Own= ! ,
withio
Annexatio
D Area
BoWidarv
List of 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
SurroWldi o. , Property , Owners ,
C-6
ATTACHMENT C
Lot Line 5
Adjustme
ntMm
Mailing 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
La.belsfor
Property
Owneu
Map of 1
Eltisting 2
Site
Condition ,
Mapaf 5 5 5
View
Area (for
wireless
communic
"ion
facilities o~;l
M", .. 1 1 1 5 5 1 1 1 1 I 5 1 I I I 5 I 1 1 5 5 I I 4 1 1 I I I I 5 1 1
applicatio 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 2
n FOnD
M", .. 1 I
PIm 2 2
Mobile I I
Home 2 2
Park Plan
Monumen 1 I 1
t Cards
(one per
nlODWDcnt
I )
Neighborh 1 1 1 1 , 5 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 I 1 5 I 1 , 5 , I 1 4 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 5 1
oodDctUI 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0
M""
Nonconfor 5 ,
mity
Relationsh
ip"""
Compabbi
lily
Narrative
Parking. , , 5 5 , 5 5 5 , 5 I 5 5 5 , 5 ,
Lot
Coverage
""d
Landscapi
no .;;,""'~
C-7
ATTACHMENTC
Pboto , , ,
Simulatio • •
ns (for
wireless
commlUlic
arion
facilities
only)
Phm I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1
Reductioo
s (PMTs)
Posta e , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
PI~ 4 ,
Certificate i
Preapplica I , , , , , , , , , , , , , 5 , , , I 1 , , , , , , , , , , 7
tion
Meeting I Suuwwy,
if any I
Preliminar-I
y Plat Plan 2
Project I I I , , I I I I , I I I , I , , I 4 I I I I I I , I
Narrative , , 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0
Project I 1
Sequencin 2 2
PI",
Proposal I I
(nonprojec 2 2
t, e.g., ....
ordinwce,
plan or
I potie" , , I
Proposal I
I ! ;
, i i , ,
Summarv 2 , I I (nonproJ~c I
, 'i ,~ II , I ;-"T -;-~ ---~"
Publtc : 1 I 2 2 i
Works
Approval
Lottu
Report on I
Design 2
Criteria
,
'0'
Modificati
OM
C,g
ATTACHMENT C
Routine I
Vegetatio
n
M_"",
nnt
Applicatio
nForm
Scr=Ung I I I I I I I I I
D_ 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Rd'use/Re
I cycling
Service , , ,
AreaM",
(for
wireless
comnlllDic -&ciIirio;
onlvl
Short Plat I
PIon 2
Short Plat ,
Plan, Final
Site Plan , , , I I I I I I I I I , I I
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 2
Site Plan, ,
Shoreline
Pmnit
Site Plan, I
Single-
Fomit,
Siting I
p,.""", 2
Report for i
U ..
Permits
forSCTF
So=e ,
StatemeDt,
Fill
Materia],
Aquifer
Proteclion
A=
C-9
ATTACHMENTC
Statement ,
Addressin
g Basis for
Alternate
and/o,
Modificati
00
Statement 4
Addressin
g the
Basis for
the
Shoreline
Permit
Exemptio
n ReQuest
Statement ,
Addressin
g the
PUD's
Relationsh
ip tathe
City's
Comprehe
nsive Plan
StreawlLa 3 I I I I I I I I 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 I I I I I I 3 I I 3 I I
keStudy 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
(8)
S~e 4
Title 3 4 4 4 4 4
Report or
Pia<
Celtifkate --,----
Topograp , , I I I
i hy l ... lap 2 2 2
(5'
!
! i
I contours) --Traffic
I
5 5 5 5 5 , 5 5 5 5 5
Study ,
4 4 4 4 4 ; 4 1 1.. ,4. ; --
4 4 4 ± 4 4 4 ; T=, , , ;
" ,4,. 4
,
&m:ill:aV
{ Deleted;~C~-ttiug
Vegetatio
n Clearing
Plao
u_ I I I I
oPesign , , I" , , " 2 2 , 2
1 I'" ", 2
,
.pi~ct" _
, , "1"
, , , "
1 ' " , " , ",
1 ' " I" ,---I " ", 1 ' " ", - -
1 1
" ", " ,
Review
p"""
Deleted: Tree Cutting! VegetatiOt "1
Approved .
Deleted: Center
Deleted: Overlay i -"-'._---",------_._--_ .. _---_ •.•.•.•. _. __ .-'
C-10
ATIACHMENTC
Utilities , , , , , , , , ,
Pbm.
Geu.emize
d
Wetlands I I I I I I I I I I I
Delineatlo 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
• Mao
Wotbnd 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mitigation
Pbm·
Preliminar
y
Wetland 3 3 3 J
Mitigation
Plan-
Final
Wetlands 3 3 3 3 3 3 J 3 3 3 3 3 J
Assessme
.t
Number of required copies (if any) is indicated in each column unless waived by the Development Services DIVIsIOn.
Table 4-8-120C Legend:
, , , , , ,
I
I I I I I I •
2 2 2 2 2 2
3 3 3 3 3 3 3
3
3 3 3 J J 3 3
I. This information is required only for those home occupations that will have customer visits, more than six(6) business deliveries per week, or
external indication of commercial activity.
2. Level of detail limited to scope listed in RMC 4-9-2\oA.
3. Level of detail required may be reduced by Administrator.
4. For conditional use permit application for wireless communication facilities, the applicant shall submit a preliminary sketch (five (5) copies)
for preliminary staff review prior to submittal of the conditional use permit application. The staff shall review this map within fourteen (J 40
working days and inform applicant of any preliminary concerns and recommendations for revisions at a schednled preapplication meeting.
The staff shall also indicate where photosimulations will be required for the application submittal, and may choose to wiave submittal
requirements for the conditional use permit when deemed appropriate. This shall not preclude the staff from making further
recommendations at the application stage.
5. Only required for projects requiring a public hearing.
6. Only required for residential projects requesting modification to special development standards in a Ceuters Residential Demonstration
District RMC 4-3-120B3, or for any development subject to special development standards requiring upper story setbacks in the Center
Office Residential 3 (CPR3) Zone, RMC 4-2-120B.
7. Only required for projects requiring review in the Urban Center Design Overlay District.
8. A standard stream or lake study is required for any application proposal. A supplemental study is required if an unclassified stream is
involved, or if there are proposed alterations of the water body or buffer.
C-1I
March 12, 2007
Monday, 7 p,m,
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL OF
COUNCILMEMBERS
CITY STAFF IN
ATTENDANCE
SPECIAL PRESENT A nON
Finance: 2005 CAFR Award
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Planning: City Code Amends
re R-4 Zone & Tree Retention
& Animal Regulations
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
MINUTES
Council Chambers
Renton City Hall
Mayor Kathy Keolker called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order
and led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag,
TONI NELSON, Council President; DENIS LAW; TERRI BRIERE; MARCI
PALMER; DON PERSSON; RANDY CORMAN. MOVED BY NELSON,
SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL EXCUSE ABSENT
COUNCILMEMBER DAN CLAWSON. CARRIED.
KATHY KEOLKER, Mayor; JAY COVINGTON, Chief Administrative
Officer; ZANETTA FONTES, Assistant City Attorney; BONNIE WALTON,
City Clerk; GREGG ZIMMERMAN, PlanninglBuildinglPublic Works
Administrator; ALEX PIETSCH, Economic Development Administrator;
Economic Development Director; REBECCA LIND, Planning Manager; DON
ERICKSON, Senior Planner; MARTY WINE, Assistant CAO; MICHAEL
BAILEY, Finance and Information Services Administrator; TERRY
HIGASHIYAMA, Community Services Administrator; CHIEF I. DAVID
DANIELS and DEPUTY CHIEF LARRY RUDE, Fire Department, CHIEF
KEVIN MILOSEVICH and COMMANDER KENT CURRY, Police
Departmen t.
Finance and Information Services Administrator Bailey announced that the City
of Renton has once again won an award for its Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report from the Government Finance Officers Association. He
explained that the association has a peer review program that reviews both the
financial reports and the budgets. Mr. Bailey noted that in addition to being
recognized for meeting the association's criteria, the peer review program also
provides the City with comments and suggestions on how to more effectively
communicate the fiscal integrity of the City to citizens.
This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in
accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Keolker reopened the public
hearing continued from 2126/2007 to consider City Code amendments
pertaining to: R-4 (four dwelling units per acre) zone development clustering;
R-I, R-4, and R-8 zone design standards; tree retention; and animal regulations.
Economic Development Administrator Pietsch stated that the proposed
amendments originated through the work of the East Renton Plateau Citizen
Task Force, which was formed to discuss potential zoning for the East Renton
Plateau Potential Annexation Area, and can be put to use within the existing
City limits. Planner Manager Lind explained that currently, small lot cluster
development is only allowed in the R-4 zone when within 600 feet of the R-8
zone. The proposed amendment allows clustering throughout the R-4 zone,
which provides incentive for open space and helps achieve maximum density in
the zone.
Turning to residential design standards, Ms. Lind reported that currently, design
features are required only in cluster developments, and vertical facade
modulation is required only in the R-4 zone. The proposal requires design
features and a vertical facade modulation throughout the R-1, R-4, and R-8
zones. She noted that the three required architectural features are decorative
March 12, 2007 Renton City Council Minutes Page 83
hipped or gabled roofs, trim on windows and doors, and projecting eaves.
Continuing with the tree retention and tree replacement regulations, Ms. Lind
indicated that the proposal addresses strengthening the regulations and is part
of an ongoing work program to maintain and improve Renton's tree canopy.
She noted that established neighborhoods and developing neighborhoods (or
infill neighborhoods) may have different priorities in tree retention. Regarding
tree removal, Ms. Lind reported that the proposed changes: eliminate the
standard based on intensity of development, allow removal of three trees on any
lot 35,000 square feet or less, and allow removal of six trees on a lot larger than
35,000 square feel.
Regarding tree retention, Ms. Lind reviewed the proposed changes such as
requiring 30 percent retention, or a minimum of 25 trees per acre, in the RC, R-
I, R-4, and R-8 zones. In more intense residential zones, \0 percent retention,
or a minimum of ten trees per acre is required.
Turning to animal regulations, Ms. Lind pointed out that the proposal addresses
large animal regulations and that an additional work program currently exists
for small and medium animals. She explained that the proposal allows property
owners with at least one acre to keep two large animals. Additionally, the
process is simplified to apply for more animals, and non-conforming uses are
allowed to continue. Ms. Lind further explained that the permitting of the
keeping of a greater number of animals than allowable will be decided
administratively, and the keeping of animals that are a non-conforming use is
transferable with the sale of the property and replacement is allowed.
Ms. Lind reported that the proposed amendments are still being reviewed by the
Planning Commission. The matter will then go before the Planning and
Development Committee, who will forward a final recommendation to Council.
In response to Council inquiries, Ms. Lind said the proposal provides that all
removed trees must be replaced; however, they can be replaced in a different
configuration. In regard to affordable housing and the potential cost increases
due to the regulations, she indicated that input from a broader group of builders
will be sought as part of this review process. Ms. Lind confirmed that under
current regulations, if a property owner owns two large animals on a 4,000
square foot lot, the animals would be non-conforming and could not be
replaced. She also confirmed that under the proposed regulations. the animals
would be non-conforming but the animal entitlement would run with the land.
Public comment was invited.
Garrett HulTman. South King County Manager of the Master Builders
Association of King and Snohomish Counties, 335 I 16th Ave. SE, Bellevue,
98004. expressed his approval of the clustering regulations, and his concerns
regarding the tree retention and design regulations and their negative affect on
the affordability of housing. He noted that it is becoming more and more
difficult for people to afford houses in this general region. Mr. Huffman
indicated that members of the Master Builders Association would welcome the
opportunity to discuss the proposed amendments with the City. Additionally.
he suggested the use of incentives to encourage added amenities to
development projects.
Ronda Bryant. East Renton Plateau Citizen Task Force Member, 6220 SE 2nd
PI., Renton, 98059, pointed out the uniqueness of the East Renton Plateau area,
saying that residents want to retain the flavor of their neighborhood and their
March 12,2007
Annexation: Benson Hill
Communities, S 200th St &
128th Ave SE
Renton City Council Minutes Page 84
quality of life. She pointed out that unlike other areas that have already been
built out, the East Renton Plateau still has two-to five-acre parcels with lots of
trees and large animals. Ms. Bryant expressed support for having the animal
ownership entitlement run with the land, and she thanked staff for all of their
hard work with the task force.
There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY NELSON,
SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
CARRIED.
This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in
accordance with local and State laws, Mayor KooIker opened fhe public hearing
to consider the 10% Notice of Intent petition calling for an election on
annexation of 2,428 acres located to the south and west of fhe Renton City
limits, in the vicinity of S. 200th SI. and 128th Ave. SE (Benson Hill
Communities).
Senior Planner Erickson reported fhat the 4.2-square-mile site has an estimated
population of 16.100, approximately 93 acres of parks, 45 linear miles of road,
and approximately 7,854 dwellings and 430,000 square feet of retail space. He
stated that public services are currently provided by Fire District #40, Soos
Creek Water and Sewer District, and the Renton (98%) and Kent (2%) school
districts. The services would remain the same upon annexation with the
exception of the fire service, which would change to fhe City of Renton.
Mr. Erickson reviewed Renton's Comprehensive Plan land use designations for
the site, and he reviewed how the proposal is consistent wifh relevant City
annexation policies. Mr. Erickson pointed out that although not the designated
sewer and water service provider, Renton will provide a full array of high
quality urban municipal services to the area, including police, fire, recreation,
street maintenance, land use and transportation planning, permitting, and
accessible government. He also pointed out that the proposed annexation is in
compliance with Boundary Review Board objectives.
For the fiscal analysis. Mr. Erickson used information from the 2005 Berk and
Associates annexation study. The estimated net operating cost to the City in
2005 dollars is approximately $681,000, including responsibility for Fire
District #40's Fire Stalion #42, but excluding the site's Renton Pool. He noted
that the preliminary costs are currently under review, and City departments are
also reviewing the transitional costs the City will incur upon annexation for
items such as equipment purchases.
Continuing, Mr. Erickson noted fhat because of fhe area's size and the State
Legislature's adoption of SSB 6686 in 2006, Renton qualifies for a 0.1 % sales
and use tax rebate that could be used to cover the discrepancy between
revenues and operating costs for the first ten years. To qualify under SSB
6686, the City has to effectuate the annexation before 11112010. He explained
that major efficiencies exist by bringing in the area at one time rather than
through multiple smaller annexations. These efficiencies include economy of
scale from allowing Renton policy to drive growth rather than King County
policy, and economic development initiatives focused on Cascade commercial
areas.
Mr. Erickson indicated that since the annexation petition was certified on
January 23, the deadline for Council action on this matter is March 24. He
stated that if Council adopts fhe resolution authorizing an election, staff
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
1. CALL TO ORDER:
2. ROLL CALL:
3. CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED:
April 4, 2007 -6:00 p.m.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7'h Floor
AGENDA
4. AUDIENCE COMMENTS •• (non·Agenda items):
5. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS:
6. POLICY/CODE STUDY SESSION:
a. 2007 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Briefing
#2007-M-03: Map Amendment to review land use designations within the Maple Valley Highway portion
of Renton's Potential Annexation Area.
STAFF PRESENTATION
AUDIENCE COMMENT ••
#:!O07 M 07: Mall ,o,meAGmaAI la review IlralleFties iA ~AiA6ar"eraleei KiA~ Ce~Aty fer seAsieleralieA af
f'laAlaA Carriaar Cammersial laRa Use with C/I, zaAiA!,!.
STAFF PRiSi~ITATION
AUDII!NCI! COMMI!NT ••
7. DELIBERATION/RECOMMENDATION:
a. Cluster and Design Guidelines, Tree Retention Standards, and Animal Regulations Ordinance
STAFF PRESENTATION
AUDIENCE COMMENT ••
8. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS:
9. ADJOURNMENT:
•• Those wishing to address the Planning Commission must complete a "Request to Speak" form located next to the
agendas at the back of the room and return it to the Recording Secretary. Speakers will be called upon by the Chair.
Each speaker is allowed three (3) minutes.
Additional information can be found online at www.rentonwa.gov/businessldefault.aspx?id=2778
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
March 21,2007 -6:00 p,m,
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
ih Floor
AGENDA
1. CALL TO ORDER:
2. ROLL CALL:
3. CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED:
4. AUDIENCE COMMENTS •• (non-Agenda items):
5. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS:
6. POLICY/CODE STUDY SESSION:
a. 2007 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Briefing
#2007-M-05: Map Amendment to consider designation of property from Employment Area Industrial with
IH zoning to Residential Medium Density with R-l 0 zoning
STAFF PRESENTATION
AUDIENCE COMMENT ••
b. Cluster and Design Guidelines and Animal Regulations Ordinance
STAFF PRESENTATION
AUDIENCE COMMENT ••
7. DELIBERATION/RECOMMENDATION:
a. Tree Retention Standards Ordinance
STAFF PRESENTATION
AUDIENCE COMMENT"
8. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS:
9. ADJOURNMENT:
•• Those wishing to address the Planning Commission must complete a "Request to Speak" form located next to the
agendas at the back of the room and return it to the Recording Secretary. Speakers will be called upon by the Chair.
Each speaker is allowed three (3) minutes.
Additional information can be found online at www_rentonwa_aov/business/default.aspx?id=2778
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
1. CALL TO ORDER:
2. ROLL CALL:
3. MINUTES: September 20, 2006
4. CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED:
March 7, 2007 -6:00 p.m.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7'h Floor
AGENDA
5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS •• (non·Agenda items):
6. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS:
7. POLICY/CODE STUDY SESSION:
Cluster and Design Guidelines, Tree Retention Standards, and Animal Regulations Ordinance Discussion
STAFF PRESENTATION
AUDIENCE COMMENT"
8. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS:
9. ADJOURNMENT:
•• Those wishing to address the Planning Commission must complete a "'Request to Speak" form located next to the
agendas at the back of the room and return it to the Recording Secretary. Speakers will be called upon by the Chair.
Each speaker is allowed three (3) minutes.
Additional information can be found online at www.rentonwa.gov/business/default.aspx?id=2778
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
January 18, 2006 -6:00 PM
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7'" Floor
AGENDA
1. CALL TO ORDER:
2. ROLL CALL:
3. MINUTES:
4. CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED:
5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS •• (non-Agenda items):
6. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS:
7. POLICY/CODE STUDY SESSION:
a. Tree Preservation Ordinance Discussion
STAFF PRESENTATION
AUDIENCE COMMENTS"
b. Highlands Sub-Area Plan Discussion
STAFF PRESENTATION
AUDIENCE COMMENTS"
8. DELIBERATION/RECOMMENDATION:
9. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS:
10. ADJOURNMENT:
•• Those wishing to address the Planning Commission must complete a "Request to Speak" form located next to the
agendas at the back of the room and return it to the Recording Secretary. Speakers will be called upon by the Chair.
Each speaker is allowed three (3) minutes.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
January 4, 2006 -6:00 PM
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7'" Floor
AGENDA
1. CALL TO ORDER:
2. ROLL CALL:
3. MINUTES:
4. CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED:
5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS" (non·Agenda items):
6. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS:
7. POLICY/CODE STUDY SESSION:
a. Tree Preservation Ordinance Briefing
STAFF PRESENTATION
AUDIENCE COMMENTS ••
8. DELIBERATION/RECOMMENDATION:
9. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS:
10. ADJOURNMENT:
•• Those wishing to address the Planning Commission must complete a "Request to Speak" form located next to the
agendas at the back of the room and return it to the Recording Secretary prior to the beginning of the meeting.
Speakers will be called upon by the Chair. Each speaker is allowed three (3) minutes.
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING I BUILDING / PUBLIC WORKS '.
Date:
To:
From:
MEMORANDUM
June 5,2007
City Cletk's Office
Stacy Tucker
Subject: Land Use File Closeout
Please complete the following information to facilitate project doseout and Indexing by the City
Clerk's Office
Project Name: Tree Retention, R-4 Standards, Animal Regulations, Design
Standards Code Changes
LUA (flle) Number: LUA-07-008, ECF
Cross-References:
AKA's:
Project Manag,r: Erika Conkling
Acceptance Date: January 24, 2007
Applicant: City of Renton -EDNSP
Owner: N/A
Contact: City of Renton -EDNSP
PID Number: N/A
ERe Decision Date: February 6, 2007
ERC Appeal Date: February 26, 2007
Administrative Denial:
Appeal Period Ends:
Public Hearing Date:
Date AppealeeUo HEX:
By Whom:
HEX Decision: Date:
Date Appealectto Council:
By Whom:
Council. Decision: Date:
Mylar Recordlr;g Number:
Project Description: Code amendments to tree retention, landscaping, animal regulations, R-4
residential zoning standards, and deSign standards code change proposals.
Location: Citywide
Comments:
George Bill
13818 152nd SE
Renton, WA 98059
tel: (425) 255-8474
(party of record)
Shelia Hurst
16025 SE 149th
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
June Hill
13527 156th Avenue SE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Marsha Rollinger
15646 SE 138th Place
Renton, WA 98059
(pa rty of reco rd)
Don & Diane Kezele
15657 SE 127th Place
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Regelio & Lolita Balais
13837 144th Avenue SE
Renton, WA 98059
tel: (425) 235-7571
(party of record)
Updated: 02/15/07
PARTIES OF RECORD
TREE RETENTION AMENDMENTS
LUA07-008, ECF
Alvin Carlson
12 Gold Court
Sequim, WA 98382
tel: (360) 681-2915
(party of record)
Ronda Bryant
6220 SE 2nd Place
Renton, WA 98059
tel: (425) 226-1204
(party of record)
Kristy Hill
13527 156th Avenue SE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Richard & Anita Oliphant
16519 SE 145th Street
Renton, WA 98059
tel: (425) 271-9825
(party of record)
John Cowan
1830 NE 24th Street
Renton, WA 98056
tel: (425) 226-1174
(party of record)
Michael Prabucki
PO Box 2132
Renton, WA 98056
tel: (253) 222-3737
(party of record)
Edward Hill
13527 156th Avenue SE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Gwendolyn High
13405 158th Avenue SE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Peter & Deborah Eberle
18225 SE 147th Street
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Robert Cave
1813 NE 24th Street
Renton, WA 98056
tel: (425) 235-1041
(party of record)
(Page 1 of 1)
STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING}
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
PUBLIC NOTICE
lody L. Barton, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising
Representative of the
Renton Reporter
a bi-weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general
circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date
of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language
continuously as a bi-weekly newspaper in King County, Washington. The
Renton Reporter has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the
Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County.
The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the
Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was regularly
distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed
notice, a:
Public Notice
was published on February 10,2007.
The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum
of$109.20.
, '~h.: ',-~'t .
Jofy'f1Barton < .,'
Lesar Advertising Representative, Renton Reportq;.;' ".,.'" D ''::
Subscribed and sworn to me this 12'h day of Febtry, ~1.0 .. ' 'r"" . ~ •• ~or01 )
~ :"i:\ ~ : ::::-*:~ ',1Q'~h -~ ~ (" I 0:'· ]' ~ ~ I (7 2ttL/m) , : :_" 20]
B D Cantelon . '. 0"
:. ,
. ,.,.,
'O;;;:~,
,.1.
" •. '
'.,!
Of;:
y
j ,
~ .' Notary Public for the State of Washington, Residing in Kent,. Washington:>'
P. O. Number: /'F
NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
COMMJ1'TEE
RENTON, WASHINGTON
The Environmental Review
Committee has issued a
Determination of Non~Significanoo for
the following projcct under the
authority of the Renton Municipal
C',ode_
Tree Retention, R-4 Standnrds.
Animal Hegula1ioll.:5 & DelSign
Standards Code Amcndnwnts
LUA#(J7-00S, ECF
Loc<ltion: Citywide. D(:'s('ription: The
prnpo:,:e.d ('{)t1f' change..-would mId
H'gulat.ion:> requiring the retention of
trees on properties subjed to
development, require architeetural
features on single-family residential
developments, allow small lot cluster
development in the R~4 zone, and
amend the use regulations for the
keeping of animals.
Appeals of the environmental
det€rmination must be filed in writing
on or before 5:00 PM on February 26,
2007. Appeals must be filed. in writing
together with the required .~75.00
application fee with: Hearing
Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South
Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055.
Appeals to tlw Examiner arc governed
by City of kenton Municipal Code
Section 1-B-J lOB. Additional
infor1llation rt!g'anling the appeal
process may be obtained fi·om the
I{ent.on City Clerk',:; Orrin:. 1·125) 130-
6510.
Published in the Renton Reporter
February 10, 2007 _ #862862
Cil lenlon Department of Planning / Building / I ' Works
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: r
APPLICATION NO: LUA07-008, ECF
APPLICANT: City of Renton -EDNSP
PROJECT TITLE: Tree Retention, R-4 Standards, Animal
Reoulations Desion Standards Code changes
SITE AREA: N/A
LOCATION: Citywide
COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 6, 2007
DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY
PROJECT MANAG~rika Conkling X
PLAN REVIEW: Kay?.n Kittnck-:::.f~
• BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A
I WORK ORDER NO:
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: 1) Changes to Citywide regulations for tree retention and the husbandry of large animals. 2)
Amendments to existing R-4 zone standards to allow small lot cluster development throughout the R-4 zone rather than just within
600 feet of the R-8 zone, and 3) Amendments to R-1, R-4, and R-8 zones to implement design standards for single family
development.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable Mare Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Eatth
Air
Water ,~
Plants
LandlShoreline Use aliffes
Animals
Environmental Hea"h
Energy!
Natural Resources
',{i'non "'"' ,';,;,;. C;
B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where 8dditiOn
C
ai m'?r:I~;s needed to properly assess thiS proposal.
_~wuA ,~Y~I-~01~ ____ __
Signature of Director or AuthonzedlRf;;presentative Date
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS)
POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTEO PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION
PROJECT NAME: Tree Retention, R-4 Standards, Animal Regulations, & Design Standards Code Changes
PROJECT NUMBER: LUA07-008, ECF
LOCATION: Citywide
DESCRIPTION: The proposed code changes would add regulations requiring the retention of trees on
properties subject to development, require architectural features on single-family residential developments,
allow amalilot cluster devEilopment in the R-4 zone, and amend the use regulations for the keeping of animals.
THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REViEW COMMITTEE (ERG) HAS DETERMINED THAT
THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE
ENVIRONMENT
Appeals 01 the environmental determination must be filed In writing on or before 5:00 PM on February 26, 2007,
Appeals must be flied in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City or
Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton
Municipal Code Section 4--8.110.8. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the
Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 43006510.
IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND
ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES DIVISION AT 430-7200.
CERTIFICATION
""~\\"'\\II" ~" Yt*I II
I, 510'11+ GSISe:e.. , hereby certIfy that 3> copies of the abo*, ~''111.
were posted by me in ~ conspicuous places or nearby the described pr_ 1" \
"
~ ~,~.1 ~ ~ ::~() -.... ~
DATE: 2...,-"9-SIGNED:; -, -~ ~
--J-~~"'),...;;j =: ~ A 'J~' ." .~ _ ,,~ ~ .~\"" ~o,-
ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington reSi~.o,;:' t 1-2.~~
~. tr.. ' {1 ~ I ~,*~
< ,on the q day of '4:" . [<LV. Lu A I ~'J..4 "10 M 4. . rJ NOTARY P BLIe SIG RE:
CITY OF RENTON
CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
On the 8th day of February, 2007, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope
containing ERC Determination documents. This information was sent to:
Name
Agencies
Parties of Record
(S;g",I"~ of Soo'''!;, ;f!;jJ{O{:, v
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) SS
COUNTY OF KING )
See Attached
See Attached
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker
Representing
signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for "\'~~~a and
purposes mentioned in the instrument. $"'~~ Iq"l
't. ~ ~ "
Notary (Print): ~\V\"l. .. r L'c
My appointment expires: ,;;-\ C\ -i 0
Project Name: Tree Retention, R-4 Standards, Animal Regulations & Design Standards Code
changes
Project Number: LUA07-008, ECF
template· affidavit of service by mailing
Dept. of Ecology'
Environmental Review Section
PO Box 47703
Olympia, WA 98504-7703
WSDOT Northwest Region'
Attn: Ramin Pazooki
King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240
PO Box 330310
Seattle, WA 98133-9710
US Army Corp. of Engineers •
Seattle District Office
Attn: SEPA Reviewer
PO Box C-3755
Seattle, WA 98124
Jamey Taylor'
Depart. of Natural Resources
PO Box 47015
Olympia, WA 98504-7015
KC Dev. & Environmental Servo
Attn: SEPA Section
900 Oakesdale Ave. SW
Renton, WA 98055-1219
Metro Transit
Senior Environmental Planner
Gary Kriedt
AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING
(ERG DETERMINATIONS)
WDFW -Stewart Reinbold' Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. •
clo Department of Ecology Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer
3190160" Ave SE 39015 -172" Avenue SE
Bellevue, WA 98008 Auburn, WA 98092
Duwamish Tribal Office' Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program'
4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert
Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015172" Avenue SE
Auburn, WA 98092-9763
KC Wastewater Treatment Division' Office of Archaeology & Historic
Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation'*
Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer
201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343
Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olympia, WA 98504-8343
City of Newcastle City of Kent
Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP
Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director
13020 SE 72,d Place 220 Fourth Avenue South
Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895
Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila
Municipal Liason Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official
Joe Jainga 6300 Southcenter Blvd.
201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188
Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868
Seattle Public Utilities State Department of Ecology
Real Estate Services NW Regional Office
Title Examiner 3190160" Avenue SE
700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 Bellevue, WA 98008-5452
PO Box 34018
Seattle, WA 98124-4018
Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and
cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application .•
Also note, do not mail Jamey Taylor any of the notices she gets hers from the web. Only send
her the ERC Determination paperwork.
template -affidavit of service by mailing
George Bill
13818 152nd SE
Renton, WA 98059
tel: (425) 255-8474
(party of record)
Shelia Hurst
16025 SE 149th
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
June Hill
13527 156th Avenue SE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Marsha Rollinger
15646 SE 138th Place
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Don & Diane Kezele
15657 SE 127th Place
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Updated: 02/09/07
PARTIES OF RECORD
TREE RETENTION AMENDMENTS
LUA07-008, ECF
Alvin Carlson
12 Gold Court
Sequim, WA 98382
tel: (360) 681-2915
(party of record)
Ronda Bryant
6220 SE 2nd Place
Renton, WA 98059
tel: (425) 226-1204
(party of record)
Kristy Hill
13527 156th Avenue SE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Richard & Anita Oliphant
16519 SE 145th Street
Renton, WA 98059
tel: (425) 271-9825
(party of record)
Michael Prabucki
PO Box 2132
Renton, WA 98056
tel: (253) 222-3737
(party of record)
Edward Hill
13527 156th Avenue SE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Gwendolyn High
13405 158th Avenue SE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Peter & Deborah Eberle
18225 SE 147th Street
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
(Page 1 of 1)
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS)
POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION
PROJECT NAME: Tree Retention, R-4 Standards, Animal Regulations, & Design Standards Code Changes
PROJECT NUMBER: LUA07-008, ECF
LOCATION: Citywide
DESCRIPTION: The proposed code changes would add regulations requiring the retention of trees on
properties subject to development, require architectural features on single-family residential developments,
allow small lot cluster development in the R-4 zone, and amend the use regulations for the keeping of animals.
THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERG) HAS DETERMINED THAT
THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE
ENVIRONMENT.
Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on February 26, 2007.
Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of
Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton
Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the
Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510.
IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND
ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES DIVISION AT (425) 430-7200.
THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
February 8, 2007
City of Renton -EDNSP
1055 S Grady Way
Renton, WA 98057
CI,* OF RENTON
PlanningiBuildingIPublic Works Department
Gregg Zimmerman P ,E" Administrator
SUBJECT: Tree Retention, R-4 Standards, Animal Regulations & Design Standards Code Changes
LUA-07-008, ECF .
Dear Parties of Record:
This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to inform you that
they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The
Committee, on February 6, 2007, decided that your project will be issued a Determination of Non-
Significance.
The City of Renton ERC has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on
the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c),
This decision was made by the ERC under the authority of Section 4-6-6, Renton MuniCipal Code, after
review of a completed environmental checklist and other information, on file with the lead agency. This
infoimation is available to the public on request.
Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed In writing on or before 5:00 PM on
February 26, 2007, Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee
with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the
Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional Information
regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510.
If the Environmental Determination is appealed, a public hearing date will be set and all parties notified. If
you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425) 430-6588.
For the Environmental Review Committee,
Rebecca Lind
Associate Planner
cc: George Bill, Alvin Carlson, Michael Prabucki I Parties of Record
------I-05-5-S-0U-th-G-ra-dy-w-aY---R-e-nt-on-,-w-a-sh-in-g-to-n-9-g-0S-7-------~ * This paper contains 50% recycled rnatel1al, 30% post consumer
AHEAD OF THE CURVE
cr T OF RENTON
Planning/Building/Public Works Department
Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator
February 8. 2007
Washington State
Department of Ecology
Environmental Review Section
PO Box 47703
Olympia. WA 98504-7703
Subject: Environmental Determinations
Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by
the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on February 6. 2007:
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT NUMBER:
Tree Retention, R-4 Standards, Animal Regulations & Design
LUA07-008, ECF
LOCATION: Applicable Citywide
DESCRIPTION: The proposed code changes would add regulations requiring the
retention of trees on properties subject to development, require
architectural features on single-family residential developments,
allow small lot cluster development in the R-4 zone, and amend
the use regulations for the keeping of animals.
Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on
February 26, 2007. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee
wiih: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the
Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information
regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office. (425) 430-6510.
If you have questions. please call me at (425) 430-6588.
For the Environmental Review Committee.
Rebecca Lind
Current Planning Manager
cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division
WDFW. Stewart Reinbold
David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources
WSDOT, Northwest Region
Duwamish Tribal Office
Karen Walter. Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance)
Melissa Calvert, Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program
US Army Corp. of Engineers
Stephanie Kramer, Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation
Enclosure
-------------,O-S-S-s-ou-t-h-G-rn-d-Y-W-a-y---R-en-to-n-,-w-a-Sh-in-~-o-n-9-8-0-S7--------------~
(i) This paper contains 50% recycled material. 30% postconsumer
AHEAD OF THE CURVE
CITY OF RENTON
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
APPLICATION NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
PROJECT NAME:
LUA07 -008, ECF
City of Renton
Tree Retention, R-4 Standards, Animal Regulations & Design Standards
Code changes
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The proposed code changes would add regulations reqUiring the
retention of trees on properties subject to development, require architectural features on single-family residential
developments, allow small lot cluster development in the R-4 zone, and amend the use regulations for the
keeping of animals.
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL:
LEAD AGENCY:
Applicable Citywide
City of Renton
Department of Planning/Building/Public Works
Development Planning Section
This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be
involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days.
Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on February 26, 2007.
Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton,
1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code
Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's
Office, (425) 430-6510.
PUBLICATION DATE:
DATE OF DECISION:
SIGNATURES:
Terry Higashiyama, Administrator
Community Services
.~ •. ---~J-
February 10, 2007
February 6, 2007
,
~--",~~,~O~7 ""-;;;-:~~-;-:-;=~:c.-::L--
Date I. David Daniels, Fire Chief
Fire Department
2Ilo 107
Date
Date
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
MEETING NOTICE
February 6, 2007
To: Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator
Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator
I. David Daniels, Fire Chief
Alex Pietsch, EDNSP Administrator
From: Jennifer Henning, Development Planning
Meeting Date: Monday, February 6, 2007
Time: 3:00 PM
Location: Sixth Floor Conference Room #620
Agenda listed below.
THE FOLLOWING IS A CONSENT AGENDA
Tree Retention. R-4 Standards. Animal Regulations. & Design Standards Code Changes Lind
LUA07-008, ECF
The proposed code changes would add regulations requiring the retention of trees on properties subject to
development, require architectural features on single-family residential developments, allow small lot cluster
development in the R4 zone, and amend the use regulations for the keeping of animals.
cc: K. Keolker, Mayor
J. Covington, Chief Administrative Officer
S. Dale Estey, EDNSP Director ®
J. Gray, Fire Prevention
N. Watts, P/B/PW Development Services Director ®
F. Kaufman. Hearing Examiner
L. Rude, Fire Prevention ®
J. Medzegian, Council
P. Hahn, P/B/PW Transportation Systems Director
R. Lind, Economic Development
L Warren. City Attomey ®
STAFF
REPORT
A. BACKGROUND
ERC MEETING DATE
Project Name
Applicant
File Number
Project Manager
Project Description
Project Location
Exist. Bldg. Area gsf
Site Area
City of Renton
Department of Economic Development, Neighborhoods and
Strategic Planning
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
February 6, 2007
Tree Retention, R-4 Standards, Animal Regulations & Design Standards Code
changes
City of Renton
LUA07-008, ECF
Rebecca Lind
The proposed code changes would add regulations requiring the retention of trees on
properties subject to development, require architectural features on single-family
residential developments, allow small lot cluster development in the R-4 zone, and
amend the use regulations for the keeping of animals.
Applicable Citywide
N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area gsf N/A
N/A Total Building Area gsf NI A
B. RECOMMENDA TlON
Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials
make the following Environmental Determination:
x
DETERMINA TlON OF
NON-SIGNIFICANCE
Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period
Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period
with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period.
C. MITIGA TlON MEASURES
None required for this non-project action.
D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Project Location Map
DETERMINATION OF
NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGA TED.
Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period
with Concurrent 14 da A eal Period.
Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period
followed by a 14 day Appeal Period.
ERe Report 07.()08.doc
City of Renton EDNSP Departme
Tree Retention, R-4 Standards, A r Regualations & Design Standards Code Amendn
REPORT AND DECISION OF February 7. 2007
Environmental Review Committee Staff Report
LUA-07-008, ECF
Page 20/3
In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the fol/owing non-project environmental review
addresses only those impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development
standards and environmental regulations.
E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS
The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/DivisIonal Reviewers for their review. Where
applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures
and/or Notes to Applicant .
.lL... Copies of aI/ Review Comments are contained in the Official File.
__ Copies of aI/ Review Comments are attached to this report.
Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be
filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM, February 26,2007.
Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of
Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton
Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the
Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510.
ERe Report 07·00B.doc
Cit, __ Renton Department of Planning / Building / I C Works
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Pm""''-..L I 5../(S
APPLICATION NO: LUA07-008, ECF' J
APPLICANT: City of Renton -EDNSP
PROJECT TITLE: Tree Retention, R-4 Standards, Animal
ReQulations, Design Standards Code changes
SITE AREA: N/A
LOCATION: Citywide
COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 6, 2007
DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 24, 2007
PROJECT MANAGER: Erika ConklinQ
PLAN REVIEW: Kayren Kittrick
BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A
I WORK ORDER NO:
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: 1) Changes to Citywide regulations for tree retention and the husbandry of large animals. 2)
Amendments to existing R-4 zone standards to allow small lot cluster development throughout the-R-4 zone rather than just within
600 feet of the R-8 zone, and 3) Amendments to R-l, R-4, and R-8 zones to implement design standards for _single family
development.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Elemenf of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housing
Air Aesthetics
Water Licht/Glare
Plants Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use Utilities
Animals Transportation
Environmental Health Public SSIVl'ces
Energy! Historic/Cultura/
Natural Resources Preservation
A/rporl Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS
/
o those areas in which we have expertise and hav,
~~~~~~g,p;tDpj~1'ssess this proposal.
ad areas of probable impact or
Date
Date: February 5. 2007
TOI REBECCA LIND. Plarmin[t Manafl:er, Economic Development
Neighborhoods and StratefTlc Plannin~ Devlston
Re, File #LUA07-008, ECF' Trce 'ietention, p-4 Standards,
Animal Regulations, Desi/rn Standards Code Chanp:es
We earnestly hope that tl,e changes in rel'!uJatlons concern\ng
the above top1cs will address the following:
TREE RETENTION, Staged clearin@: in pew developments to TeRser>
the negative visual impact to the ez1sting neighborhood, and to
aid in controlling water run-off and solI erosion durinll cleve1-
opment; use of an independent arborlst to select trees (lnalv1d-
ually and in stanas) with the best chance of survival! tree
replacement of at least a 2-1 ratio with native deciduouR ana
evergreen trees; and protection (by uf\lnp: chain 11nk fencing)
of the root systems of trees deslStoated for retention.
ANIMAL REGULATIONS, Larp:e animal!' on properties in the Fast
Renton Plateau should be "~ranafathered" at the time of anne~
atlon! and because of the rllTal che.racter of portions of the
Plateau, those properties should continue to qualify as "Large
Animal" properties if they are sold or pal"sed on to heirs;
however, the animals must 101" sef'n to have adequate ~oom and
acceptable living conditions for their well being.
CLUSTERING IN THE R-4 ZONE: As long as this does not allow
increased density in the B-4 or q-l zones, this could be a
valuable tool in protectir.v even minor wetlands, self-sustain-
ing stands of trees and increasing the number of enVironmentally
valuable greenbelts.
DESIGN STANDARDS: These should insure quality constructIon,
and should include requirements that will produce interestinl'!
and d1verse ne1ghborhoods and not the cookie-cutter developments
which have occurred recently and often in areas of the Plateau.
All of these 1ssues are fundamental to the quality of 11fe
not only on the Plateau (East Benton Plateau) but elsewhere in
Renton as well. Addressing these issues will demonstrate that
Renton 1s a forward-thinking, "Big Picture" community.
dJ~ Nc:J
Sh",\ '.0. ~ 4lt~s-r
l (.,0'&5 SC ftt-q-r ~1
~-<?MTO\J rv..) ~ L'l~6Sc7
Datel February 5. 2007
TOI REBECCA LIND. Plann1n~ Mana~er. Economic Developwent
Neighborhoods and Stra!:ep:lc Flannlnp: Devl.s1011
ReI File #LUA07-008. ECl<' Tree Retention. p_h Standards.
Animal Regulations. De'llp;n Standards Code Chanp:es
We earnestly hope that the chanp:9fl 1n rep:ulations CO!'l~ernl,.,p:
the above top1cs will address the following,
TREE RETENTION, Staged cleartn,o: 1 n new deve] opments to , el',,>'n
the negative visual impact to the exlsttnl'" nelp-hborl-Jood. and to
aid in controlling water run-off and sol.l erosion during devel-
opmentl use of an independent arborist to select trees (indIvid-
ually and in stands) with the best chance of survival; tree
replacement of at least a 2-1 ratio with nat1ve rleclduou~ and
evergreen treesl and protection (by us1np: cl-Jal.n llnk fenclnt:rl
of the root systems of trees des1p:nated for retention.
ANH1AL REGULATIONS, Larp:e an imals on propert, es 1 f1 tl-Je r.:e.~ t
Renton Plateau should be "p"randfathered" at the time or annex-
ationl and because of the rural character of portions of the
Plateau. those properties SYJould ('.ontinue to qual tfy as "Tar!!"e
Animal" properties if they are 'lold or passed on to he1rs;
however. the an1mals must hp seen to have adequate !'oom and
acceptable 11ving conditions for their well beln~.
CLUSTERING IN THE R-4 ZONE, As long as this does not al10'~
increased dens1ty in the B-1} or R-t zones. this could be a
valuable tool 1n protectlnp: even minor wetlands. self-~llsta.:tn
lnS stands of trees and increaslnp: the number of envlronmentallv
valuable greenbelts.
DESIGN STANDARDS, 'rhese 8hould insure Qual1 ty constru('tl.on I
and should 1nclude requirements that \'1ill produce tnterest!n!':
and diverse neighborhoods and not the ('.Dokie-cutter developwe,.,ts
which have occurred recently and often in areas of the Plateau.
All of these issues are fundamental to the Qua11ty of lire
not only on the Plateau (East Renton Plateau) but elsewhere In
Renton as well. Addressing these issues will demonstrate that
Renton ls a forward-thinktnE'. "Bip: Picture" community.
Date: February 5, 2007
To: REBECCA LIND, Planni!""-'·'BrlB.,-er, Economic I'evelopl!'ent
Neighborhoods and Stratep-Ic Plannin", I'evls10n
Re: File #LUA07-008, ECF ~~pp nptention, ?-4 Standards,
Animal Regulations, rpsip-~ 2tandards Code Changes
We earnestly hope that t'le c ',anges in regulations conoernlng
the above topics will address the following:
TREE RETENTION: Staged clearing in new developJ11ents to lessen
the negative visual impact to the existing neighborhOod, and to
aid in controlling water run-off and soil erosion during de,rel-
opment; use of an independent arborist to select trees (indivId-
uallyand in stands) with the rpst chance of survival; tree
replacement of at least a 2-1 ratio with native deciduous and
evergreen trees; and protection (by using chain link fencing)
of the root systems of treps designated for retention.
ANIMAL REGULATIOKS: LaTQ'e ar.imals on properties in the fast
Renton Plateau should be "vrandfathered" at the tIme of annex-
ation; and because of the T')r81 cha.racter of portions of the
Plateau, those properties s'101110 continue to qualify as "Large
Animal" properties if they aTP paId or passed on to hell'S;
however, the animals must r'p ppen to have adequate room and
acceptable living conditions for their well being.
CLUSTERING IN THE R-4 ::ee·'"': As lonl< as this does not all 0'"
increased denSity in the p_4 or ~-1 zo~es, this could be a
valuable tool in protectinp-even minor wetlands, self-sustain-
ing stands of trees and increasir:p: the nUJ11ber of environmentally
valuable greenbelts.
DESIGN STANDARDS: These "hovld insure quality constructIon;
and should include requirerrents that will produce interest in",
and diverse neighborhoods and not the cookie-cutter developments
which have occurred recently And often in areas of the Plateau.
All of these issues are fundamental to the quality of lire
not only on the Plateau (':':80St qe~ton Plateau) but elsewhere in
Renton as well. Addressin~ these issues will demonstrate that
Renton is a forward-thinkinv, "Dip: Picture" community.
pw~{lfoJ!
( d WQ.v-d J. \-\ ~ \ \
\35..<1-15(" \\-vcS,6
~eM\-on) vJJT Q'lOS1
<.\2-5-::i2.0,Qt;,'ll,
!~/~
f(ns r-'( J: ;.I,i!
(55--.:2 7 IS",A-r.lC. ~C
f1 e-",-Iv" / We< . '7 posy
Ll)r;--;<2~ -7& S'b
Date: February 5. 2007
To: REBECCA LIND, Planning ~anager. Economic Development
Neighborhoods and Strategic Plann1ng Devision
Re, File #LUA07-008, ECF Tree Retention, B-4 Standards.
Animal Regulat1ons. Design Standard.s Code Changes
We earnestly hope that the changes in reguJ.at1ons coneern1ng
the above topics will address the following:
TREE RETENTION: Staged clearing in new developments to lessen
the negative visual impact to the existing neighborhood, and to
aid in controlling water rUll-off and soil erosion during devel-
opment; use of an independent arborist to select trees (1ndiv'd-
ually and in stand.s) with the best chance of survival; tree
replacement of at least a 2-1 ratio with native deciduous and
evergreen trees; and protection (by using chain link fencing)
of the root systems of trees designated for retention.
A."IMAL REGULATIONS, Large animals on properties in the Fast
Renton Plateau should be "grandfathered" at the time of anne:K-
atlon; and because of the rural character of portions of the
Plateau, those propertles should continue to qualify as "Large
Animal" propert1es if they are sold or passed on to heirs;
however, the animals must be seen to have adequate noom and
acceptable living conditions for their well being.
CLUSTERING IN Tg-'R-4 ZONE: As 10n12: as this d.oes not a110'lo1
increased dens1 ty in the R-4 or "-1 zones, this could. be a
valuable tool in protectin~ even mlnor wetlands, self-sustain-
ine: s-tands of trees and. increa.slng the number of environmentally
valuable greenbelts.
DESIGK STANDARDS: These should insure quality constru~tion;
and should include requirements that will produce interestin~
and diverse neighborhoods and not the cookie-cutter developments
which have occurred recently and often in areas of the Plateau.
All of these issues are fundamental to the quaIl ty of IH'e
not only on the Plateau (East Renton Plateau) but elsewhere in
Renton as well. Addressing these issues will demonstrate that
Renton 1s a forward-thinkinl<, "Big Picture" community.
Date: February 5. 2007
To: REBECCA LI~D, Plannin~ Yanager, Economic Development
Neighborhoods and strate~ic Planning Devision
Rei File #LUA07-008, ECF Tree Retention. p-4 Standards,
Animal Regulations. Desig~ Standard.s Code Changes
We earnestly hope that the changes in regulations COneerning
the above topics will address the following I
TREE RETENTION: Staged clearing in Tlew developments to lessen
the negative visual impact to the eXisting neighborhood, and to
aid in controlling water run-off and soil erosion during devel-
opmentl use of an independent arborist to select trees Ondiv1 d-
ually and in stands) with the best chance of survival I tree
replacement of at least a 2-1 ratio with native declduous and
evergreen trees, and protection (by using chain link fencing)
of the root systems of trees designated for retention.
ANIMAL REGULATIOKS: Large animals on properties in tl1.e Fast
Renton Plateau should be "p:randfathered" at the time of anneJr-
atlon, and because of the rural character of portions of the
Plateau, those properties should continue to qualify as "Large
Animal" properties if they are sold or passed on to heirsl
however. the animals must be seen to have adequate !'loom and
acceptable living conditions for their well being.
CLUSTERING IN THER-4 ZONE: As long as this d.oes not allow
increased dens1 ty in the R-I} or 01.-1 zones. this could. be a
valuable tool 1n proteotin~ even minor wetlands, self-sustaln-
inl s'tands of trees and increas i np; the nUlllber of enVironmentally
valuable greenbelts.
DESIGN STANDARDS: These should insure quality constru(\tionl
and should inolude requirements that will produoe interestin~
and d1verse neighborhoods and not the cookie-outter developments
whioh have occurred recently and often in areas of the Plateau.
All of these issues are fundamental to the quality of life
not only on the Plateau (East Renton Plateau) but elsewhere in
Renton as well. Addressing these issues will demonstrate that
Renton 1s a forward-thinking, "Big Pioture" community.
Date: February 5, 2007
To: REBECCA LIND, Plarminpc '-anapcer, Fconom.l c Development
Neighborhoods and Stratep-ic Planninp: Deviston
Re. File #LUA07-008, ECF Tree Retention, n-4 Standards,
Animal Regulations, l'esip;n Standards Code Chanp;es
We earnestly hope that tf\e changes in regulations concerning
the above topics will address the follo~rinlt:
TREE RETENTION I stap'ed c1 e~rinp' in new d.evelopments to 1essen
the negative visual impact to the existinp' neip;hborhood, and t.o
aid in controlling water run-off and 80il erosion durinp; cjeve1-
opment; use of an independent arborist to select tree!" (individ-
ually and in stands) with +:he rest chance of surVival; tree
replacement of at least a ?-1 ratio with native deciduous and
evergreen trees I and. protectl.on (by using Chain link fencing)
of the root systems of trees desip;nated for retention.
ANIMAL REGULATIONS. Lar",e animal .. on propertIes in the Fast
Renton Plateau should be "p;randfathered" at the time of annex-
ationl and because of the rural character of portions of the
Plateau, those properties should continue to qualify as "Large
Animal" properties if they are Rold or passed on to he1rsl
however, the animals must he seen to have adequate r.oom and
acceptable living conditions for their well be1n/l:.
CLUSTERING IN THE R-4 ZCI\E: As lonp: as this does not allcl~
increased d.ensi ty in the R-~· or R-l zones. thlfl could be 8.
valuable tool in protectinp; even minor wetlands, self-fluRtain-
ins stands of trees and increaSing the number of environmentally
valuable greenbelts.
DESIGN STANDARDS I These flhould insure qual1 ty constru('.t1 on I
and should include requirell'snts that will produce inter€'stlmr
and diverse neighborhoods and not the cookie-cutter developments
which have occurred recently and often in areas of the Plateau.
All of these issues are fundamental to the quality of life
not only on the Plateau (East R€'ntcn Plateau) but elsewhere in
Renton as well. Addressirlg theRe issues will demonstrate that
Renton is a forward-thinkin,.., "",il' Pict.ure" community.
Date, February 5, 2007
To: REBECCA LIND, Plannln~ ¥anager, Economic Development
Neighborhood.s and strategic Flanninp: Devision
Rei F1le #LUA07-008, Eel" Tree Retention, ?-4 Standards,
Animal Regulations, DesiP:!'! Standards Code Changes
We earnestly hope that the changes in regulations coneerntng
the above topics will address the following I
TREE RETENTION: Staged clearing in new developments to lessen
the negative visual impact to the existing neighborhood, and to
aid in controllIng water run-off and soil erosion during devel-
opment; use of an independent arborist to select trees (lndiv1 d-
ually and in stands) with the best chance of survival; tree
replacement of at least a 2-1 ratio with native dec'duous and
evergreen trees; and protection (by using chain link fencing)
of the root systems of trees designated for retention.
ANIMAL REGULATIONS I Larp:e animals on properties in the Fast
Renton Plateau should be "~randfathered" at the time of' anneJr-
atlon; and because of the rural character of portions of the
Plateau, those properties should continue to qualify as "LarS'e
Animal" properties if they are sold or passed on to heirs;
however, the animals must be seen to have adequate l':oom and
acceptable living conditions for their well being.
CLUSTERING IN THl!lR-4 ZONE, As long as this does not allow
increased denSity in the H-4 or 1<.-1 zones, this could be a
valuable tool in protectinp: even minor wetlands, self-susta1n-
in, stands of trees and increasing the number of environmenta.lly
valuable greenbelts.
DESIGN STANDARDS, These should. insure quaIl ty construction I
and should include reqUirements that w111 produce interestlrll:!'
and diverse neighborhoods and not the cookie-cutter developments
which have occurred recently 8.nd often in areas of the Plateau.
All of these issues are fundamental to the Quality of life
not only on the Plateau (East Renton Plateau) but elsewhere in
Renton as well. Addressing these issues will demonstrate that
Renton is a forward-thinking, "Bip: Picture" oommunity.
Date: February 5, 2007
TOI REBECCA LIND, Planninp-Menep:er, Econom1c Development,
Neil':hborhoods and Stratep:i(l Planninp: Devision
Re, File #LUA07-00P, ECl" Tr"e Petentlon, 11-4 standards,
Animal Regulations, Desip:TI Standards Code Chanp:es
We earnestly hope that the chanp'es in rep:ulatlons coneerning
the above topics will address the followinP:1
TREE RETENTION. Staged clearlnp: in new developments to lessen
the negative visu~l impact to the eXistinp: netp'hborhood, and to
aid in controlling water run-off and solI erosion durin/l devel-
opment; use of an independent arborist to select trees (lndlv,d-
ually and in stands) with the best chance of survival; tree
replacement of at least a 2-1 ratio with native decidlloufO and
evergreen trees; and protection (by usinp: chain llnk fenclnQ')
of the root systems of trees desip:nated for retention.
ANIMAL REGULATIONS, Jarp:e animals on properties in tl1e r<:ast
Renton Plateau should be "p:rBndfathered" at the time of anne~
ation; and because of the rural character of portIons of the
Plateau, those properties should continue to qualify as "Tarp'e
Animal" properties if they are I'old or passed on to helrs;
however, the animals must "A seen to have ad.equa te r:oom and
acceptable living conditions for their well being.
CLUSTERING IN THE R-4 ZeME, As Ion", as this does not allow
increased densIty In the H-4 or B-1 zones, this could be a
valuable tool in protect in v even minor wetlands, self-sllstatn-
in, stands of trees and increaslnp: th" number of enVironmentally
valuable greenbelts.
DESIGl'< STANDARDS, These should i'18ure quality constru('.tton;
and should include requirerrents that will produce interesttnp:
and diverse neighborhoods and not the cookie-cutter developments
which have occurred recently and often in areas of the Plateau.
All of these iS8ues are fundamental to the auality of 11~e
not only on the Plateau (East Henton Plateau) hut elsewhel"e in
Renton as well. Addressinp: these issues lofill demonstrate that
Renton is a forward-thinking, "Big P1ct.ure" community,
. I 1\
/) /RA.IE { J)o;J
j~
~~~
SE 137 7/L-,oi.
lU ;fj ;1)? i' '57
City ___ 'enton Department of Planning I Building I P : Works
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Rzrtt-s
APPLICATION NO: LUA07-008, ECF
APPLICANT: City of Renton -EDNSP
PROJECT TITLE: Tree Retention, R-4 Standards, Animal
ReQulations, DesiQn Standards Code chanQes
SITE AREA: NIA
LOCATION: Citywide
COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 6, 2007
DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 24,2007
PROJECT MANAGER: Erika Conkling
PLAN REVIEW: Kayren Kittrick
BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A
I WORK ORDER NO:
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: 1) Changes to Citywide regulations for tree retention and the husbandry of large animals_ 2)
Amendments to existing R-4 zone standards to allow small lot cluster development throughout the R-4 zone rather than just within
600 feet of the R--8 zone, and 3) Amendments to R-1, R-4, and R-8 zones to implement design standards for single family
development.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable .. "'.
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth
Air
Water
Plants
LandlShoreJine Use
Animals
Environmental Health
Energy/
Natural Resources
"0\) f'f' \) rt ~ --h--c,.e, y-~ ,/"\
Ov~ 0-.. i "'-"\u~~~'l..
Ov\ ~ f\ G "-c.. ~ Y'rt:> ~""
B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS
Element of the
Environment
lousino
~ ~
Public S.rvices
M;;;U';;'" ",.1
'n;", C;
Probable Probable "ore
Minor
Impacts
Major Information
Impacts Necessary
o"c:.. S(}l<J +-t~" -
e esl-w~ \-t,
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional inform n is needed to properly assess this proposal.
City __ Renton Department of Planning / Building / I _, c Works
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: C.()n~r LlCA-I (. n
APPLICATION NO: LUA07-008, ECF
APPLICANT: City of Renton -EDNSP
PROJECT TITLE: Tree Retention, R-4 Standards, Animal
Reaulations, Desion Standards Code changes
COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 6, 2007
DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 24,2007
PROJECT MANAGER: Erika Conkling
PLAN REVIEW: Kayren Kittrick RE'cTI\tED
SITE AREA: N/A BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A JAN l. 6 2007
LOCATION: Citywide I WORK ORDER NO: BUILDING DIVISION
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: 1) Changes to Citywide regulations for tree retention and the husbandry of large animals_ 2)
Amendments to existing R-4 zone standards to allow small lot cluster development throughout the R-4 zone rather than just within
600 feet of the R-8 zone, and 3) Amendments to R-1, R-4, and R-8 zones to implement design standards for single family
development
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Environment Minor Major Infonnatlon
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Em"
ater
ants ~
Use Uti,"i.s
~n~~r:. ~.
:~:~~~::;
B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
re additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
tive Date
Ci., _. Renton Department of Planning / Building / c Works
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: T("(l.f ~~" ~J It n
APPLICATION NO: LUA07-008, ECF '
APPLICANT: City of Renton -EDNSP
PROJECT TITLE: Tree Retention, R-4 Standards, Animal
ReQulations, Design Standards Code chanQes
SITE AREA: N/A
LOCATION: Citywide
COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 6, 2007
DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 24,2007
PROJECT MANAGER: Erika Conkling R E'cVitntE 0
PLAN REVIEW: Kayren Kittrick JAN 2 6 2007
BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A 1>'"' n,,,,r.:
I WORK ORDER NO:
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: 1) Changes to Citywide regulations for tree retention and the husbandry of large animals. 2)
Amendments to existing R-4 zone standards to allow small lot cluster development throughout the R-4 zone rather than just within
600 feet of the R-8 zone, and 3) Amendments to R-1, R-4, and R-8 zones to implement design standards for single family
development.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable MOte
Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major 'n'annat/on
Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth HOUSing
Air
Wa ...
Plants
LandlShorefine USB
Animals ~
Environmental Health
Energy/
Natural Resources
';"M"~.
"Mn ••• ,
B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS
A/~
C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS
!f/~
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identdied areas of probable impact or -·---i-· ..... -~-~
Cit, __ Renton Department of Planning / Building /, c Works
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Pto-r. RevieL~
APPLICATION NO: LUA07-008, ECF
APPLICANT: City of Renton -EDNSP
PROJECT TiTlE: Tree Retention, R-4 Standards, Animal
Reoulations, Desian Standards Code chanoes
SITE AREA: N/A
LOCATION: Citywide
COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 6, 2007
DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 24, 2007 "DC HeN fUN
PROJECT MANAGER: Erika Conklino R E C E , V E U
PLAN REVI EW: Kayren Kittrick JAN 26 2{}07
BUILDING AREA (oross): N/A BUILDING DIVISION
I WORK ORDER NO:
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAl: 1) Changes to Citywide regulations for tree retention and the husbandry of large animals. 2)
Amendments to existing R-4 zone standards to allow small lot cluster development throughout the R-4 zone rather than just within
600 feet of the R-8 zone, and 3) Amendments to R-1, R-4, and R-B zones to implement design standards for single family
development.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth
Air
Water ~
Plants
Land/Shoreline Use Utilities
Animals
Environmental Heanh Public So,..icos
Energy!
Natural Resources
R~:;"';;';' >. o'
.;'; ,~:
B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS
We have reviewed this appfication with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas w re additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
Cit, __ Renton Department of Planning / Building /, c Works
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: FirE COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 6, 2007
APPLICATION NO: LUA07-008, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 24,2007
APPLICANT: City of Renton -EDNSP PROJECT MANAGER: Erika Conkling
PROJECT TITLE: Tree Retention, R-4 Standards, Animal PLAN REVIEW' Kayren Kittrick r
Regulations, Design Standards Code changes "
.... _-------_.
~-.:
_S"'I:..:.T"'E.:.;A::..;R:=EA:..:.:'-'-"N/c..A'--_____________ -+-=S"'U""IL:.:D""IN:..:.Go:..:..:A'-'R=EA:..:.'-'= (grro""s",s),,-:: ,-,N/,,-A,--~-,-: '-1' l_ ..... ~-=-___ -ll i
'i ,JAN 2 5 2007 LOCATION: Citywide WORK ORDER NO: .
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: 1) Changes to Citywide regulations for tree retention and the hJsban~f I~me animals. 2\ I
Amendments to existing R-4 zone standards to allow small lot cluster development throughout the 11-4 zone rattlei't"tharr just williiif-l .
600 feet of the R-8 zone, and 3) Amendments to R-l, R-4, and R-8 zones to implement desitn_slanda(dsfOr single family ,
development. -------. --.-----______ 1
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable "'''''' Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Eanh ""sing
Air
Water
Plants
Land/Shoreline Use
Animals ~
Environmental Health Public So",;ees
Energy/
Natural Resources
:~
'mn~<M
B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS
this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
nal informatio eeded to properly assess this proposal.
Dale p~107
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF
NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS)
DATE;
LAND USE NUMBER:
APPLICAnON NAME:
Janu(l1)I24.2007
LUA07.008, ECF
Tree RetentIon, R-4 Standards. Animal Regulations,lM6!gn Standards Cod" Ctlange15
PROJECT DESCRIFTION: 1) Chartges to Citywide "'IIulatic",,, for tree retention and lila hll8l>undTy of large
animals. 2) A"",ndm..rns to .. x;"~ng R_4 zone Slaooa,as to allow smalllo! <:111810' development tlYoughoullha R-4 rona ratt-
than jusl within 600 I_I of the R_B 20ne, aoo 3) Amendments 10 R.l, R-4, and R-S 20Jnes 10 Implamanl dtiign staOO"rd9 for
single family development
PROJECT LOC'" TION: An"" .. 1 and Tree regulations applicable Citywide, c"",,,t .. , regulaliono applicable in the R·
4 "m .. crtyw,de. De.ign Regulalionll applicabko in the R_l, R_. and R-B zenas "itr"'id .. ,
OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON·SIGNIFICANCE (ONS): hJ 111& lS/ld Agency, the C~y of Renton has d"' .. rmined lhat
significant ~1'VTI<I"tal impac;ts. are unlikely to resuk from the proposed rut .. changes. Therefore, as pennittlOd ...... , the RCW
4J.21C.110, the Crty of R,,",on i& USing the OptIOnal ONS prrn:eu to gi ..... notice ht a ONS i& hkely to be ;""ued, Comrr\a1t
periods for th" pR>jO!d: and 1M ~5ed ONS are integrated into a single comment period. Thare w~1 be no oomm.\l period
folow'ng the ;""uance of th" Threshold Oet..-mmatlon of Non-Significance (DNS) A 14.<:fay appeaf period wi~ Iof""" the
.... U!lnce of t .... ONS
PERMIT APPlICATION DATE:
Perm~ev;-Requeated
Ott-Permits whICh may be required
Requeated Stud_
L<>Clloon where appfication may
ber"",ewed
PUBLIC HEARING:
CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW:
landU .. :
Environmental Document. that
Ev .. I"'-IIM Propa-.:l Projact:
o.v.lopmtlnl R.gulatlo ....
U .. d For ProjeClt MHlgatlon:
January 24 2007
Er"'rnnmerll>lf (SEPAl Rev;-, Zoning Tut Changes
'" N"
Plann",gl8uild;ngIPublic Wotluo Dwion. Delffilopmllnt SeNices Dapartment, lD55
Soull, Grady Way Renton, WA 08055
A r"hll~ hearing on Ihrs issua wil be held before the Renton City Counci FebfUllry 26.
2007
The lext changes are consistent with the Comprahell8ive Plan. specifically ralevant
LaOO Use and Communrty Des'lln Element policies adopted in November 2004
Environmental Checkhst prepared January 22, 2001
Thl~ non-project action '011,11 be subject to the Crty's SEPA Ordinance arod Development
Regulations aOO othe, applicable codes arod regulatioll8 as aj)!lropriatto
PropOHd Mitigation M.nu .... : The analy~'~ 01 th .. propo",,1 doe. not reveel any ad-.erse .rwirotvnantal Impacts
requiring mltlgalion above and beyond ex'stlng code provis,ons. FIIIu,,, de specific: development processed pursuant to th ....
text amendments may require fuithe-r en\'ironmental re .... ew and/or m~iun m""BUrea
Comments on the atoo~e application must be submitted in writ,ng 10 ~ Lind. Planning Manager. Eoonomic OeYllk>pment
Neighborhoods end Stretoogic Planning D,VISIOn, 1055 South Grady Way. Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 p,m. on Fabruary e, 2007.
If you haYO queslions atoout \his proposal, or wrsh to be nrede" party of record snd receive additional notillcation by mall. oontact
the Pro)otCt M.nagar. Anyona who subrn;ts written comment~ wil auiomaticaUy become a party of record and ~I be nottfijed of
alll' decision on thl. project.
CONTACT PERSON: REBECCA LIND (425) 430-6588
I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CAlLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION
"you wouklilb to ... c.l ... fur1IM. InFormation on the environmental review of thl. propOHd profKi, complete thi ..
'arm and .. tum to: City of Ranton. Development PLanning, 1055 South Grady W-r. Renton, WA 1111055. You must r.rum
Ihis Iorm)o recelYfl fulurolnlormatloo regarding III .... nwronmanlel d<Jtermimmon lot Ihi" projecf
file No.lName: LUA07-OO8. ECF T"", Retention. R-4. Standards, Animal ReguMtfon., Dulgn Siand.rd. Code Ch .. ngn
NAME: ______________________________________________________ ___
ADDRESS: ____________________ ~
TELEPHONE NO.: ________________ _
CERTIFICATION
I, 0l1dl}f1 ~U 191(1 , hereby certify that :; copies of the above document
were posted by me in ~ conspicuous places or nearb the described property on
,,"'''\\'''''111 •.
DATE: 0/.24-, 2COJ SIGNED: .$''''",~~ ~/~
A TrEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington reSidi.j If,,J:'c T 40\' ~ \\
~t'; ~ ~
-• --,.. #" , , . : ~ }q~'1K ,onthe ;:Jt,1'" day of GC1\"l/L'-'5 If ~..I..~j
"iIIQjWA~ IIII\\\"'~
CITY OF RENTON
CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
On the 24'h day of January, 2007, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope
containing NOA & Environmental Checklist documents. This information was sent to:
Name Representing
Agencies See Attached
Parties of Record -NOA only See Attached
(Signature of Sendert ~ ",,:jUJJav'
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) SS
COUNTY OF KING )
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker
signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and
purposes mentioned in the instrument. ~""':'~'~~\"" .;1"~ •••• '," III",
Dated: \ -Sill<> -07 :"I":>,,~> ',; ~.-"~ ~
Notary Public in and the Sate 0fW~~hi~O -1'.1. \
'-:. --~-,
fl mhQ L L '/ n 0 Hi!} s.&\IY'-Y, 10~·"<et.c. 1 i .. -\'" -'0 -,:. "''.1'' " _/~=
-:J '"-\ I ~ . "'., :., •• : ~~ i '~"-.... o~ ,i,l<'*~~J I~q\\\\~~
Notary (Print):
My appointment expires:
Project Name: Tree Retention, R-4 Standards, Animal Regulations, Design Standards Code
Changes
Project Number: LUA07 -008, ECF
template -affidavit of service by mailing
Dept. of Ecology'
Environmental Review Section
PO Box 47703
Olympia, WA 98504-7703
AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING
(ERG DETERMINATIONS)
WDFW -Stewart Reinbold' Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept.
clo Department of Ecology Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer
3190 160th Ave SE 39015 -172" Avenue SE
Bellevue, WA 98008 Auburn, WA 98092
•
WSDOT Northwest Region' Duwarnlsh Tribal Office' Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program'
Attn: Ramin Pazooki 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert
King Area Dev. Serv., MS·240 Seattle, WA 98106-1514 3901517200 Avenue SE
PO Box 330310 Auburn, WA 98092-9763
Seattle, WA 98133-971 0
US Army Corp. of Engineers • KC Wastewater Treatment Division' Office of Archaeology & Historic
Seattle District Office Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation*
Attn: SEPA Reviewer Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer
PO Box C-3755 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343
Seattle, WA 98124 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olympia, WA 98504-8343
Jamey Taylor'
Depart. of Natural Resources
PO Box 47015
Olympia, WA 98504-7015
KC Dev. & Environmental Servo City of Newcastle City of Kent
Attn: SEPA Section Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP
900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director
Renton, WA 98055-1219 13020 SE 72'd Place 220 Fourth Avenue South
Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895
Metro Transit Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila
Senior Environmental Planner Municipal Liason Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official
Gary Kriedt Joe Jainga 6300 Southcenter Blvd.
201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188
Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868
Seattle Public Utilities State Department of Ecology
Real Estate Services NW Regional Office
Title Examiner 3190 160'h Avenue SE
700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 Bellevue, WA 98008-5452
PO Box 34018
Seattle, WA 98124·4018
Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and
cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application .•
Also note, do not mail Jamey Taylor any of the notices she gets hers from the web. Only send
her the ERC Determination paperwork.
template -affidavit of service by mailing
Alex Karooiannis
13109 168th Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
Anita & Richard Oliphant
16519 SE 145th St
Renton, WA 98059
Anthony & Annie Porcello
1817 Jones Ave NE
Renton, WA 98056
Barb Hics
1805 NE 20th St
Renton, WA 98056
Bill & Barbara Dewey
13820 SE 141st St
Renton, WA 98059
Bob & Georgia Howard
13116 162nd Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
Brian & Jean Stearns
2216 Jones Ave NE
Renton, WA 98056
Bryce Van Parys
29832 2nd PI SW
Federal Way, WA 98023
Corey Smith
13206 162nd Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
Dale Fisher
13115158th Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
Alex Strukov
13427 172nd Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
Ann Collin
13504 181st Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
Armando Zorbin
2400 NE 10th PI
Renton, WA 98056
Barbara Joy Johnson
1824 Jones Ave NE
Renton, WA 98056
Bill Grover
P.O. Box 2701
Renton, WA 98056
Bob Chamberlin
17414 SE 142nd St
Renton, WA 98059
Brian & Judy Thomas
14715 182nd PI SE
Renton, WA 98059
Caren Smith
16217 SE 132nd St
Renton, WA 98059
Cyndi Pilwallis
14233 171st Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
Dana C. Day
14034 169th Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
Alvin Carlson
12 Gold Court
Sequim, WA 98382
Anthony & Annie Porcello
1817 Jones Ave NE
Renton, WA 98056
B & T Bang
14709 SE 145th PI
Renton, WA 98059
Bill & Barbara Dewey
13820 SE 141st St
Renton, WA 98059
Bob & Georgia Howard
13116 162nd Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
Brian & Jean Stearns
2216 Jones Ave NE
Renton, WA 98056
Brian Savo
16533 SE 149th St
Renton, WA 98059
Corey Smith
13206 162nd Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
D.E. Blood
3711 Park Ave N
Renton, WA 98056
Darrell & Sue Kinzer
1733 NE 20th St
Renton, WA 98056
Dave Mack
17212 SE 128th
Renton, WA 98059
Dennis Banes
1909 Jones Ave NE
Renton, WA 98056
Dick Gilroy
Northward
1560 140th Ave NE, #100
Bellevue, WA 98005
Dong Choi
14820 SE Jones PI
Renton, WA 98058
Doug Lindbland
13825 139th SE
Renton, WA 98059
Frank & Ronda Bryant
6220 SE 136th PI
Renton, WA 98059
Garrett & Evelyn DeCerce
15003 SE 143rd PI
Renton, WA 98059
George Bill
13818 152nd Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
Glen Jessen
13026 163rd Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
lIie Antonescu
15316 SE 133rd Ct
Renton, WA 98059
David McBride
1706 Kennewick Ave NE
Renton, WA 98056
Dermont Christensen
14228 1715t Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
Don & Jeanie Baurichter
14025 176th Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
Doug & Terrie Comouche
17546 SE 135th SI
Renton, WA 98059
Ernie Flowers
14225 169th Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
Fritz Brendemihl
2116 High Ave NE
Renton, WA 98056
Garrett Huffman
335 116th Ave SE
Bellevue, WA 98004
Gina Corder
13625 SE 135th St
Renton, WA 98059
Gwendolyn High
13405 1581h Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
Inez Petersen
3306 Lake Washington Blvd #3
Renton, WA 98056
Deborah, Charles, & Lenora Gibson
2008 NE 20th St
Renton, WA 98056
Dick Gilroy
Northward
1560 140th Ave NE, #100
Bellevue, WA 98005
Don & Sherry Ross
442 Mud Hen Lp SE
Ocean Shores, WA 98569
Doug Lindbland
13825 139th SE
Renton, WA 98059
Frank & Ronda Bryant
6220 SE 136th PI
Renton, WA 98059
Garrett & Evelyn DeCerce
15003 SE 143rd PI
Renton, WA 98059
Gary & Patricia Walker
14629 181st Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
Glen Jessen
13026 163rd Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
Harry Kodis
2619 Jones Ave NE
Renton, WA 98056
Irma Sidebotham
1633 Jones Ave NE
Renton, WA 98056
Jackie Blanchard
13007 162nd Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
James Nelson
1905 NE 20th St
Renton, WA 98056
Jean Spencer
1809 Jones Ave NE
Renton, WA 98056
Jim & Jeanne Noel
17441 SE 140th St
Renton, WA 98059
Jimmy & Andrea Toy
14802 167th PI SE
Renton, WA 98059
John Cowan
1830 NE 24th St
Renton, WA 98056
June & Kris Hill
13527 156th Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
Kevin Wyman
16540 SE 149th St
Renton, WA 98059
Larry Robinson
13205 181st Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
Mare & Durward Clare
1818 Jones Ave NE
Renton, WA 98056
Jacques & Mary Lecoq
16627 SE 134th
Renton, WA 98059
Jason & Heidi Jarman
13709 175th Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
Jeffrey Sidebotham
13004158th Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
Jim Sween
2514 Jones Ave NE
Renton, WA 98056
John & Kelly Morgan
2414 Jones Ave NE
Renton, W A 98056
John Kuspert
14527 171st Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
June Hill
225 Vesta Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
Kim Frodsham
13425 164th Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
Lewis Gifford Jr.
13616 SE 135th St
Renton, WA 98059
Marie Larsen
2006 NE 20th St
Renton, WA 98056
James & Joan Posz
P. O. Box 2695
Renton, WA 98056
Jean Spencer
1809 Jones Ave NE
Renton, WA 98056
Jennifer & Terry Hayes
14258 183rd Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
Jimmy & Andrea Toy
14802 167th PI SE
Renton, WA 98059
John Cowan
1830 NE 24th St
Renton, WA 98056
June & Kris Hill
13527 156th Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
Kerry Abercrombie
John L. Scott
4735 NE 4th St, Ste B
Renton, WA 98059
Larry Robinson
13205 181st Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
Lucille Everette
13814 SE 142nd St
Renton, WA 98059
Mark & Kelly Peterson
18338 SE 147th PI
Renton, WA 98059
· ,
Marsha Rollinger
15646 SE 138th PI
Renton, WA 98059
Michael & Linda Turner
15713 SE 148th ST
Renton, WA 98059
Michael Ryan
13640 183rd Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
Moti Shewn
55 Gardenia St
Clearwater, FL 33767
Nick & Beverly Kenik
14754 173rd Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
Randy & Sheri Grittman
1909 Monterey Ave NE
Renton, WA 98056
Richard Savage
12909 158th Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
Robert & Deanna Dobak
1700 NE 20th St
Renton, WA 98056
Robert Cave
1813 NE 24th St
Renton, WA 98056
Robert Krauss
2708 NE 24th
Renton, WA 98056
Mary Nguyen
9102 SE 41st St
Renton, WA 98040
Michael Prabuki
p, O. Box 2132
Renton, WA 98056
Michael Smith
13029172nd Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
Naney & Carlin Buchanan
14055 183rd Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
Patrick Gilroy
1560 140th Ave NE, #100
Bellevue, WA 98005
Rich Hutchinson
14063 1715t Ave S
Renton, WA 98059
Rick & Karen Redfern
2000 NE 20th St
Renton, WA 98056
Robert & Roberta Butcher
2422 Jones Ave NE
Renton, WA 98056
Robert Graham
17404 SE 140th St
Renton, WA 98059
Rogelio & Lolita Balais
13837 144th Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
Michael & Joan Davis
2020 NE 20th St
Renton, WA 98056
Michael Ryan
13640 183rd Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
Michele Odren
2030 NE 20th St
Renton, WA 98056
Nick & Beverly Kenik
14754 173rd Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
Randy & Sheri Grittman
1909 Monterey Ave NE
Renton, WA 98056
Richard Savage
12909 158th Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
Rick, Eli, & Lauralee Gordley
2010 Jones Ave NE
Renton, WA 98056
Robert Cave
1813 NE 24th St
Renton, WA 98056
Robert Graves
14034 180th SE
Renton, WA 98059
Roland Gillespie
14214 169th Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
•
Rolf Erhard
14401 178th Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
Sandra A. Patten
13930 147th PI SE
Renton, WA 98059
Sharon A. Barker
15718 SE 143rd St
Renton, WA 98059
Steve & Lisa Holtzner
16823 SE 134th
Renton, WA 98059
Suzanne Krom
P. O. Box 16155
Seattle, WA98116
Tara Mullins
16636 SE 134th St
Renton, WA 98059
Theodore Pard ike
51 Ruskin Rd
E Aurora, NY 14052
Tom Carpenter
15006 SE 139th PI
Renton, WA 98059
William Johnson
15902 SE 134th PI
Renton, WA 98059
Ruby Cacchione
16931 SE 138th St
Renton, WA 98059
Scott Day
1932 NE 20th St
Renton, WA 98056
Shelia Hurst
16025 SE 149th St
Renton, WA 98059
Steve Blackman
2100 Jones Ave NE
Renton, WA 98056
T. Johnson
14522 166th PI SE
Renton, WA 98059
Terry Dutro
10711 SE 30th St
Bellevue, WA 98004
Theresa Elmer
3101A NE 13st St
Renton, WA 98056
William Henry
13707 156th Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
William O'Connor
10402 151 st Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
Russell Berg
14014 SE 139th
Renton, WA 98059
Sharon A. Barker
15718 SE 143rd St
Renton, WA 98059
Stephanie Lorenz
John L. Scott
4735 NE 4th St, Ste B
Renton, WA 98059
Suzanne Krom
P. O. Box 16155
Seattle, WA 98116
Tara Mullins
16636 SE 134th St
Renton, WA 98059
Theodore Pard ike
51 Ruskin Rd
E Aurora, NY 14052
Theresa Wester
Bennett Development
12011 NE 1st, Ste201
Bellevue, WA 98012
William Johnson
15902 SE 134th PI
Renton, WA 98059
William Peterson
17261 SE 140th St
Renton, WA 98059
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF
NON·SIGNIFICANCE (DNS)
DATE:
LAND USE NUMBER:
APPLICATION NAME:
January 24, 2007
LUA07-008. ECF
Tree Retention, R-4 Standards. Animal Regulations, Design Standards Code Changes
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 1} Changes to CityNide regulations for tree retention and the husbandry of large
animals. 2) Amendments to existing R-4 zone standards to allow small lot cluster development throughout lIle R~4 zone rather
than just within 600 feet of the R-8 zone, and 3) Amendments to R-1. R-4. and R-8 zones to Implement design smndards for
single family development.
PROJECT LOCATION: Animal and Tree regulations applicable Citywide, duster regulations applicable in the R-
4 zone citywide, Design Regulations applJcable in the R-1, R-4 and R-8 zones citywide.
OPTIONAl DETERMINATION OF NON·SIGNIFICANCE CDNS): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renlon has determined that
significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed rule changes. Therefore, as pennitted under the RCW
43.21C.110, the City of Renton Is using the Optional DNS process to give notice that a DNS is likely to be issued. Comment
periods for the project and the proposed DNS are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period
following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Signfficance (DNS). A 14-<:1ay appeal period will follow the
issuance of the DNS.
PERMIT APPLICATION DATE:
PennitslReview Requested:
Other Permits which may be required:
Requested Studies:
Location where application may
be reviewed:
PUBLIC HEARING:
CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW:
Land Use:
Environmental Documents that
Evaluate the Proposed Project:
Development Regulations
Used For Project Mitigation:
January 24. 2007
Environmental (SEPA) Review, Zoning Text Changes
N/A
N/A
Planning/Building/Public Works Division. Development Services Department, 1055
South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055
A public hearing on this issue will be held before the Renton City Council February 26,
2007.
The text changes are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, specifically relevant
Land Use and Community Design Element policies adopted in November 2004.
Environmental Checklist prepared January 22, 2007
This non-project action will be subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance and Development
Regulations and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate.
Proposed Mitigation Measures: The analysis of the proposal does not reveal any adverse environmental impacts
requiring mitigation above and beyond existing code provisions. Future site specific development processed pursuant to these
text amendments may require further environmental review and/or mitigation measures.
Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Rebecca Und, Planning Manager, Economic Development
Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 p.m. on February 6, 2007.
If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact
the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of
any decision on this project.
CONTACT PERSON: REBECCA LIND (425) 430·6588
lPLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION
If you would like to receive further Infonnation on the environmental review of this proposed project, complete this
fonn and return to: City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. You must return
this form to receive future information regarding the environmental determination for this project.
File NoJName: LUA07-008, ECF Tree Retention. R-4 Standards, Animal Regulations. Design Standards Code Changes
NAME: ______________ --______________________________________________ __
ADDRESS: ____ ----------------__ ----__________________________ ~~ ____ __
TELEPHONE NO.: ______________________ _
01/25/2007: Mailed to Parties of Record, per att3ched labels.
-" ..........................................................
c... City of Renton)"I';ENr·)
·F RENrcS;r'NG
LAND USE PERMIT JAN 232lXJ7
MASTER APPLICATIONRECEIVED
PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION
NAME: CITY OF RENTON PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Tree Retention, R-4
Standards, Animal Regulations, Design Standards Code
ADDRESS: 1055 S. Grady Way
Changes
PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: niB
CITY: Renton ZIP: 98055
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 425-430-6588 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): nla
APPLICANT (if other than owner)
NAME: Rebecca Lind EXISTING LAND USE(S):nla.
COMPANY (if applicable): EDNSP Department PROPOSED LAND USE(S): niB.
ADDRESS: 1055 S. Grady Way EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ):
nla.
CITY: Renton ZIP: 98055 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION
TELEPHONE NUMBER 425-430-6588
(if applicable): nla.
EXISTING ZONING: nla.
CONTACT PERSON
NAME: Erika Conkling
PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): nla.
COMPANY (if applicable): EDNSP Department
SITE AREA (in square feet): nla.
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED
ADDRESS: 1055 S. Grady Way FOR SUBDIVISIONS OR PRIVATE STREETS SERVING
THREE LOTS OR MORE (if aoolicable): nla
CITY: Renton ZIP: 98055 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET
ACRE (if applicable): nla.
TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: x 6578
NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): nla
NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): nla
Q: web/pw Idevserv/forms/pianningimasterapp ,doc 01122/07
~OJECT INFORMATION (c( "nued)
NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): nla
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS (if applicable): nla
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): nla
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON·RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS (if applicable): nla
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON·RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): nla
NET FLOOR AREA OF NON·RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if
applicable): nla
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE
NEW PROJECT (if applicable): nla
PROJECT VALUE: nla
IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF
ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE
SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): nla
o AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE
o AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO
o FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft.
o GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft.
o HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft.
o SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq. ft.
o WETLANDS sq. ft.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
(Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included)
SITUATE IN THE OF SECTION -, TOWNSHIP , RANGE ,IN KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTON. NlA
TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES
List all land use applications being applied for:
1. Code Amendment 3.
2. Environmental Checklist 4.
Staff will calculate applicable fees and postaQe: $
AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP
I, (Print Name/s) Rebecca Lind , declare that I am (please check one) _ the current owner of the property
involved in this application or _X_ the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing
statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Rebecca Lind
(Signature of Owner/Representative)
(Signature of Owner/Represeptative)
Q:web/pw/devserv/formsiplanning/masterapp.doc
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that==========
signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the
uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
My appointment expires: _________ _
01122/07
"
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
City of Renton Development Services Division
1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055
Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231
PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST:
'JAN 23 2G07
RECEIVED
The Slate Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43,21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies
to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions, An Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the
quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the
agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be
done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal.
Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your
proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most
precise information known, or give the best description you can.
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases,
you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need
to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal,
write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary
delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and tandmark
designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can
assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of
time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal
or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your
answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant
adverse impact.
USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS:
Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not
apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON PROJECT ACTIONS (part D).
For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in
the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal,"
"proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively.
H:IEDNSPITitle IVlGenerallTree Retention120071SEPA Checklist 2007.doc01l22f07
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
Code Changes: Tree Retention, R-4 Standards, Animal Regulations, Design Standards
2. Name of applicant:
City of Renton
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
Erika Conkling x 6578
1055 S. Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
4. Date checklist prepared:
January 22, 2007
5. Agency requesting checklist:
City of Renton
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
NIA
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected
with this proposal? If yes, explain.
NIA. There may be future changes to the landscape code and design standards as part of the
normal review of docketed code amendments
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared,
directly related to this proposal.
NIA
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals
directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
NIA
10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
City Council approval of the code revision.
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the
project and site.
The proposal is to add regulations requiring the retention of trees on properties subject to
development, requiring architectural features on single-family residential developments, allowing
small lot cluster development in the R-4 zone, as well as, changes to the animal regulations.
H:IEDNSPITitle IV\GenerallTree Retention\2007\sEPA Checklist 2007.doc 2
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise
location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and
range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries
of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if
reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not
required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this
checklist.
City wide.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. EARTH
a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous,
other _____ _
NIA
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?)
NIA
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat,
muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any
prime farmland.
NIA
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so,
describe.
NIA
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading
proposed. Indicate source of fill.
NIA
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally
describe.
NIA
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project
construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
NIA
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any:
NIA
H:IEDNSPITitle IV\GenerallTree Retention\2007lSEPA Checklist 2007.doc 3
2. AIR
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile.
odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If
any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known.
NIA
b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so,
generally describe.
NIA
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any:
NIA
3. WATER
a. Surface Water:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-
round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type
and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into.
NIA
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described
waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
NIA
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from
surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected.
Indicate the source of fill material.
NIA
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
NIA
5) Does the proposal lie within a 1 DO-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan.
NIA
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
NIA Proposed changes to animal regulations would allow additional large animals on a
properly. Best management practices for livestock should prevent discharge into surface
water. In the areas where the proposal would be in effect the change in regulations is
unlikely to affect an increase in the number of large animals, it is intended to
accommodate already existing animals.
H:\EONSP\Title IV\General\Tree Retention\2007\SEPA Checklist 2007.doc 4
b. Ground Water:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give
general description. purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
NIA
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other
sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following
chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of
such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of
animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
NIA
c. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and
disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water fiow? Will this water
flow into other waters, If so, describe.
NIA
2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.
NIA Proposed changes to animal regulations would allow additional large animals on a
proper/yo Best management practices for livestock should prevent discharge into surface
water.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if
any:
NIA. Proposal would be likely to reduce runoff water impacts in some areas by requiring
the retention of existing vegetation.
4. PLANTS
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
__ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
__ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
shrubs
__ grass
__ pasture
__ crop or grain
__ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other
__ water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other
__ other types of vegetation
NIA
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
NIA
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
H:IEDNSPITitle IVlGenerallTree Retentionl2007\SEPA Checklist 2007.doc 5
NIA
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance
vegetation on the site, if any:
NIA. This proposal would require the retention of existing vegetation at higher rates than
is currently required by City code.
5. ANIMALS
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known
to be on or near the site:
Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other ________ _
Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other .,-----, _______ _
Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other ______ _
NIA
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
NIA
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain
NIA
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
NIA. The proposed change would require the retention more trees than required under
the current code, which may provide wildlife habitat in some areas.
6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet
the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating,
manufacturing, etc.
NIA
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so,
generally describe.
NIA. This proposal would require the retention of trees on properties subject to develop.
Additional tree retention may be more likely to block the potential use of solar energy on
adjacent properties in some areas. However, there is a partial exemption from retention
requirements if clearing is needed to facilitate solar designed structures and fuel solar
energy panels.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal?
List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any:
NIA
7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
H:\EDNSPlTitle IV\General\Tree Retention\2007\SEPA Checklist 2007.doc 6
b.
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals,
risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this
proposal? If so, describe.
NIA
1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
NIA
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
1 )
NIA
Noise
What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic,
equipment, operation, other)?
NIA
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a
short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)?
Indicate what hours noise would come from the site.
NIA
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
NIA
8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
NIA
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
NIA
c. Describe any structures on the site.
NIA
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
NIA
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
NIA
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
NIA
H:IEDNSPlTiUe IV\GenerallTree Retention12007lSEPA Checklist 2007.doc 7
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site?
NIA
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so,
specify.
NIA. Sites classified as critical areas already have tree retention requirements in place.
This proposal does not alter those regulations.
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
NIA
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
NIA
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
NIA
I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected
land uses and plans, if any:
NIA
9. HOUSING
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle,
or low-income housing.
NIA
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low-income housing.
NIA
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
NIA
10. AESTHETICS
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is
the principal exterior building material(s) proposed.
NIA
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
NIA. The proposal would require the retention of existing trees, which could potentially
obstruct views in some areas. However, a developer has latitude and discretion in
deciding which trees are to be retained to meet the code requirements.
H:IEDNSPITitie IV\GenerallTree Retention12007lSEPA Checklist 2007.doc 8
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
NIA Changes to the design standards seek to ensure aesthetic impacts will be satisfying
and acceptable to residents of the City.
11. LIGHT AND GLARE
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly
occur?
NIA
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?
NIA
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
NIA
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
NIA
12. RECREATION
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?
NIA
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe.
NIA
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation
opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:
NIA To qualify for small lot cluster development 30% of the land must be set aside as
designated significant open space. This may be reduced to 20% if access is public, soft
surface trails are create, and storm water ponds are designed to eliminate engineered
slopes requiring fencing and enhanced to allow passive and/or active recreation.
13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local
preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe.
NIA
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or
cultural importance known to be on or next to the site.
NIA
H:IEDNSPITitle IVIGenerallTree Retention120071SEPA Checklist 2007.doc 9
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
NIA
14. TRANSPORTATION
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to
the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
NIA
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the
nearest transit stop?
NIA
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the
project eliminate?
NIA
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or
streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or
private?
NIA
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation?
If so, generally describe.
NIA
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If
known, indicate when peak volumes would occur.
NIA
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
NIA
15. PUBLIC SERVICES
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire
protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe.
NIA
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any.
NIA
16. UTILITIES
H:IEDNSPITitle IV\Gene,allTree Retention120071SEPA Checklist 2007.doc 10
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service,
telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other.
NIA
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service,
and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might
be needed.
NIA
c. SIGNATURE
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and
complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non·significance
that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or
willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
Proponent:
Name Printed:
Date:
H:IEDNSPITitle IVlGenerallTree Retention\2007lSEPA Checklist 2007.doc 11
D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NON PROJECT ACTIONS
on policies, plans and
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the
list of the elements of the environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities
likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate
than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production,
storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise?
The proposal would not increase discharge to water, emission to air, toxic substances, or noise.
There may be some small improvements to storm water systems and air quality through the
retention of existing trees. Proposed changes to animal regulations would allow additional large
animals on a proper/yo Best management practices for livestock should prevent discharge into
surface water. In the areas where the proposal would be in effect the change in regulations is
unlikely to affect an increase in the number of large animals, it is intended to accommodate
already existing animals.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
NIA
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life?
The proposal would preserve a slightly greater amount of existing vegetation in the future than
the current regulations would require. More trees would be preserved than under current
regulations and this may provide some habitat benefits for animal life.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are:
NIA
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
NIA
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are:
NIA
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas
designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness,
wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites,
wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands?
There would not be any likely affects on areas designated for governmental protection. Perhaps
some small benefits in the preservation of wildlife habitat. Tree retention is already required in
critical areas, and this change would not affect those regUlations.
H:IEDNSPlTiUe IV\GenerallTree Retention\2007lSEPA Checklist 2007.doc 12
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are:
NIA
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would
allow or enccurage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans?
This proposal is compatible with existing land and shoreline plans.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
NIA
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and
utilities?
NIA
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are:
NIA
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may confiict with local, state, or federal laws or
requirements for the protection of the environment.
This proposal is compatible with requirements for the protection of the environment.
SIGNATURE
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and
complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance
that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or
willful lack offull disclosure on my part.
Proponent:
Name Printed:
Date:
ENVCHLST.DOC
REVISED 6198
l~utW!
H:\EDNSPlTitle IVlGene,al\T,ee Retention\2007\SEPA Checklist 2007.doc 13
Project Narrative: Text amendments to the Renton City Municipal Code pertaining to
the following sections:
• Tree Retention-Amend sections of Renton Municipal Code pertaining to tree
retention, including RMC 4-4-070 Landscaping, RMC 4-4-130 Tree Cutting and
Land Clearing Regulations, Submittal Requirements and Definitions in RMC 4-8-
120, RMC 4-9-195 Routine Vegetation Management Permits, and Definitions in
RMC 4-11. The intended result of these changes is to institute a tree retention.
program that preserves at least 25% of the existing trees on properties under
development. The proposed changes create standards for tree preservation and
protection, including standards for replacing trees that can not be retained and
replanting properties that have previously been cleared. The proposed changes also
tighten the regulations that currently exempt properties under half(.5) an acre in
size from any tree retention requirements, by reducing lot size to 4,500 square feet.
• Animal Regulations -Change to text that allows a maximum of one large animal
per acre to allow a maximum oftwo large animals per acre in residential zones:
Resource Conservation, Residential One Dwelling Unit per acre, and Residential
Four Dwelling Units per acre. A change in the permitting of conditional uses for
greater than the allowable number of animals from the hearing examiner to an
administrative decision. Also, deletion of the animal replacement and transferability
clauses in the nonconforming uses section.
• R-4 Standards-Deletion of the text that states that small lot cluster development is
only permissible in the Residential four dwelling units per acre zone when within
600 feet of the Residential Eight Dwelling Units per acres zone. Small Lot Cluster
development will be allowed throughout the Residential Four Dwelling units per
acre zoning designation.
• Design Standards -Addition of text that requires vertical fa~ade modulation, as
required in the Residential Four Dwelling Units per acre zone, to both the
Residential One Dwelling Unit per acre zone and the Residential Eight Dwelling
Units per zone. Also, addition of text requiring architectural features, as required in
Small Lot Cluster development, to the residential zones: Residential One Dwelling
Unit per acre, Residential Four Dwelling Units per acre, and the Residential Eight
Dwelling Units per acre. Architectural features will include decorative hip or gable
roofs, trim on windows and doors, and projecting eaves.
ENT p\.1?!NING oE'I~F RENToN
.IAN 'l '3 '].l1tH
RECEWED
PROPOSED CHANGES FOR TREE RETENTION-DRAFT January 2007
4-4-070 LANDSCAPING:
C. AUTHORITY AND INTERPRETATION
LPLANS REQUIRED~
Conceptual and delailed landscaping plans are required for all non-exempt development.
Specific submittal requirements shall be as indicated in RMC 4-8-120. Submittal Requirements.
The conceptual plans must be submitted prior to any land use action approval and detailed
landscape plans must be approved prior to issuance of a building permit.
2. Authority and Interpretation: The City's Development Services Division Director. or his
duly authorized representative. is hereby authorized and directed to interpret and enforce all
the provisions of this Section. (Ord. 5137, 4-25-2005)
3. Independent Secondary Review: The City's Development Services Director. or a duly
authorized representation. may require independent review of any land use application that
involves tree removal and land clearing at the City's discretion, An evaluation by an
independent qualified professional regarding the applicant's analysis on the effectiveness of
any proposed removal, retention, or replacement measures. to include recommendations as
appropriate, This shall be paid at the applicant's expense and the City shall select the third
party review professional,
D. GENERAL LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS:
1. Street Frontage Landscaping Required: On-site landscaping is generally required along
all street frontages. with the exception of areas of pedestrian walkways and driveways,
2. Pervious Areas to Be Landscaped: Pervious areas, with the exception of critical areas
and critical area buffers, shall have landscape treatment as appropriate. Landscaping may
include hardscape such as decorative paving, rock outcroppings, fountains, plant containers,
etc.
3. Residential Rear/Side Yard/Landscaping Along Streets: When rear or side yards are
along property lines abutting a street, there shall be a minimum fWesix-foot (li§') planting area
in the public right-of-way, This will_Ge&sitale setting any future fencing Fenching shall be
set back from the edge of the right-or-way so that the landscaping is visible from the street.
Landscaping is required prior to occupancy, Maintenance of such areas shall be the
responsibility of the property owner(s). The maintenance re~uirement may necessitate
provision of a gate in the fence 10 access-theplanling area,
4. Compliance with Zone Standards Required: See specific zone requirements listed in
chapter 4-2 RMC,
5. Parking Lot Landscaping Requirements: Parking lot landscaping requirements are
listed in RMC 4-4-080F7,
6. (Rep. by Ord. 5153, 9-26-2005) Protected trees shall be retained in accordance with RMC
4-4-130.
7. Use of Existing Plant Material: Existing trees and other vegetation on the site of a
proposed development shall be used to augment new plantings to meet the requirements of
this section. where ~raslisal if Ihe tjtlalily-i~~alle er aeller IRan a\'ailaale n~rsery slesk.
a. Existing Trees: '-II/hen a sllfvay-.ofBx4sting Irees is req~ired (see RMC 4 !I 120,
S~amillal Reqllirements), thesurvay-or-inventery ef trees shall insillde the name, size,
and location of all trees greater thafl--Si;Hnches (6") in diameter at fellr feet (4 ') aaeve
grollnd elevalien. The aOllndaries and predominant species of slam's of Irees censisling
of five (5) or more trees six inches (6") in diameter at feur feel (4 ') aao';e ground
elevation shall ee insicates theresA-,
b. Trees Ie Be Retained: Trees existing en a development site tRal are te ae relained
sRall ge im'isaled en the sleariA{l-and-{lraeing plan, conseptllallamlsGape plan, and on
Ihe delailer:J landscape plan. Such trees shall have the approximate drip line she'Nn. The
grading and clearing plan shall-iooicata-metheds ef tree protection dllring constrllction fer
alilrees 10 ee retained. If grade changes ap~ear necessary, tho method of reconciling Ihe
finished elovalion within IRe drij}-linoshalfee incl~ded. Trees retained or replaced in
accordance with the minimum requirements in RMC 4-4-130 Tree Retention and Land
Clearing Regulations shall not be counted toward meeting the landscaping requirements
of this section.
8. Use of Drought-Resistant Plants: Incorporation of drought-resistant j}lants into the
landscape is encouraged.
9. Avoidance of Hazards: All landscaping shall be planned in consideration of the public
health, safety, and welfare.
a. Landscaping shall not intrude within the clear vision area at driveways and street
intersections.
b. Trees planted near overhead power lines shall be species that will not eventually
inlerfere withgrow into such lines.
c. Landscaping shall not obscure fire hydrants or access for emergency-response
vehicles.
d. Avoid planting trees that may damage sidewalks.
10. Preservation of Unique Features: '>-practicable, uniqueUnique features within the site
shall be preserved and incorporated into the site development design (such as significant
vegetation and rock outcroppings).
11. Green River Valley bandssaping-Re(juirements: Any Elevelo~menl in Ihe Green River
Valley shall ~revide a minimum ef tW0-j}efGont (2%) of Ihe tolal site for landscaping suilaele
fer wildlife haMal. TRese areas shoHlG-llal-l:le dispersed thro~ghout a site, alll sho~ld ae
aggre€lated in one porlion of the properlYcWhere ~ossiale, the req~ired Iwe ~eFGent (2%)
landscaping for adjaGent pro~erties-shauJG-be.Gentiguous. This lanElsca~ing is in add ilion 10
any olher land6Ga~ing requirements-ny-this geclion or any other reg~lation. A drainage
2
swale, ~Iantes with vegetation 6~ilaGl&f{}l'RaBitat, may Be eountes to'HaFa the PliO ~eF6ent
(2%) asaitionallanssGa~e FequiFementiilheRe'liewing OffiGial aeteFmines that the I')FOl')osed
~Ianting I')lan ans sY/ale aesign willluRGlion to meet the intent of these Fegulations, inGlusing,
But not limites to, that the (aGility slope and fenGing sesign wo~la not inhiBit wilalile use. The
following mal') del')iGts the Boundaries·{)I-lt.Jis mea:
3
,
GREEN RIVER VALLEY
;"1
m=F==-iJL~~~~/~ -< ..... 1
I
··~jl l ,! .,,-
I' ,
I
12. Slopes: Stripping of vegetative slopes where harmful erosion and run-off will occur shall
be avoidedprohibited. The faces of cut and fill slopes shall be developed and maintained to
control against erosion. This control may consist of effective planting. The protection for the
slopes shall be initiated upon completion of grading and fully installed within thirty (30) days
of grading completion and prior to a request for final project approval. Where slopes are not
subject to erosion due to the erosion-resistant character of the materials such protection may
be omitted with the permission of the Public Works Department, provided that this protection
is not required by the rehabilitation plan.
13. Erosion Control Devices: Where necessary, check dams, cribbing, riprap or other
devices or methods shall be employed to control erosion and sediment, provide safety and
control the rate of water run-off.
14. Permanent Underground Irrigation System Required:
a. Underground irrigation systems shall be installed and maintained in good working
order in all landscaped areas of industrial, commercial, and multi-family development,
and landscaped common areas in single family subdivisions.
b. The irrigation system shall provide full water coverage of the planted areas as
specified in the plan.
c. The irrigation system maintenance program shall include scheduled procedures for
winterization.
d. Exceptions: Landscape plans featuring one hundred percent (100%) drought tolerant
plants or landscaping already established without irrigation systems are exempt from
installation of permanent irrigation system, but drought tolerant proposals must provide
supplemental moisture by means of a City-approved temporary irrigation system for a
period not less than two (2) years. The applicant must provide a maintenance security
device for a period of three (3) years from the date of approval of landscape installation to
ensure survival of plants.
H. AMENDED LANDSCAPING PLAN:
1. Modification of Landscape Plans: In the event there are significant physical elements
that are discovered after preliminary plan approval that may prevent installation of the
landscaping as proposed, the landscape plan may be modified upon request to the
Development Services Director. Such request must be accompanied by the following:
a. Copy of original, approved landscape plan.
b. An amendment plan meeting requirements of RMC 4-8-120D12, Landscape Plan,
detailed.
c. Narrative describing and justifying proposed changes.
d. Modified tree retention and land clearing plan for any protected trees proposed to be
removed in accordance with RMC 4-4-130 H1e.
2. Acceptability of Requested Modifications: The plans may be approved, denied or
returned to the applicant with suggestions for changes that would make them acceptable.
5
3. Failure of Plan to Meet Intent: The Development Services Director may initiate revisions
to an approved landscape plan. prior to release of an ass~ransea surity device. if the installed
landscaping has failed to meet the intent of City landscape requirements.
K. DAMAGED LANDSCAPING:
Upon re~~est of tho City, any Llandscaping required by City regulations that is damaged must be
replaced with liko or bollor lansssaping as determined by the Development Services Director.
See also "Specific Landscape Requirements, Trees" herein. Damaged protected trees shall be
replaced in accordance with RMC 4-4-130 H1e.
(Ord. 3718, 3-28-1983; Ord. 4832, 3-6-2000; Ord. 4856, 8-21-2000; Amd. Ord. 4963, 5-13-2002;
Ord. 5100,11-1-2004)
4-4-130 TREE CUTTING RETENTION AND LAND CLEARING REGULATIONS:
A. PURPOSE:
This Section provides regulations for the clearing of land and the protection and preservation of
trees, shrubs and groundcover plants-aAfi-associalos signifisant vegetation. The purposes of
these regulations are to:
1. Preserve and enhance the City's physical and aesthetic character by minimizing
indiscriminate removal or destruction of trees. shrubs. and ground cover;
2. Implement and further the goals and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan for the
environment, open space, wildlife habitat, vegetation, resources, surface drainage,
watersheds, and economics;
3. Promote b~ilsing ane sito IllanningflFastiGes that aro sonsislont with the City's nat~ral
lopograllhisal ane lIogotati\'o foature&while at the samo time resognizing that sortain fastors
s~sh as sonsition (o.g., disease, danger·ol·falling, ots.), prsl(imity to existing ans proposed
strllst~ros and imprsvemonts, interloronGB-With utility serllioos, Ilrotootion of soonio views,
and the roalization of a reasonable ~njoyment of Ilroporty may re~uiro tho romoval of sertain
treos and gro~nd sover;
4. Ensure prompt dO'loloF'moAt, restoration, and reF'lanting, amj effesti'le erosion 60ntFoi of
Ilroporty auring and after land sleariAgi
5:1. Promote land development practices that result in minimal adverse disturbance to
existing vegetation and soils within the City while at the same time recognizing that certain
factors such as condition (e.g., disease, danger of falling, etc.). proximity to existing and
proposed structures and improvements. interference with utility services. protection of scenic
views. and the realization of a reasonable enjoyment of property may reguire the removal of
certain trees and ground cover;i
e§. Minimize surface water and groundwater runoff and diversion, and aid in the stabilization
of soil, and to minimize erosion and sedimentation, and minimize the need for additional
storm drainage facilities caused by the destabilization of soils;
7§. Retain clusters of trees for the abatement of noise and for wind protection,i and to reduce
air pollution by producing pure oxygen from carbon dioxide.
6
8. Recognize that trees and gFOund-BGvBHwuCe air pollution by producing pure oxygen fForn
carbon dioxise. (Ord. 5137, 4-25-2005)
7. Protect trees during construction activities from damage to tree roots. trunks. and
branches.
8. Recognize that trees increase real estate values.
B. APPLICABILITY:
The regulations of this Section apply to any developed, partially developed or undeveloped
property where land development or routine vegetation management activities are undertaken.
(Ord. 5137,4-25-2005)
C. AbbOWA8bE ALLOWEDTREE CUTTING REMOVAL ACTIVITIES:
Tree Gulting removal and associated use of mechanical equipment is permitted as follows, except
as provided in subsection D2 of this Section, Restrictions for Critical Areas, and in RMC 4-3-
110E5b, Urban Separator Overlay Regulations.
1. Emergency Situations: Removal of trees andlor ground cover by the City andlor public or
private utility in emergency situations involving immediate danger to life or property,
substantial fire hazards, or interruption of services provided by a utility.
2. Dead, Dangerous, or Diseased Trees: Removal of dead, terminally diseased, damaged,
or dangerous ground cover or trees which have been certified as such by a forester,
registered landscape architect, or certified arborist, selection of whom to be approved by the
City based on the type of information required, or the removal of which is approved by the
City,
3. Maintenance Activities/Essential Tree Removal -Public or Private Utilities, Roads
and Public Parks: Maintenance activities including routine vegetation management and
essential tree removal for public and private utilities, road rights-of-way and easements, and
public parks.
4. Installation of SEPA Exempt Public or Private Utilities: Installation of distribution lines
by public and private utilities; provided, that such activities are categorically exempt from the
provisions of the State Environmental Policy Act and RMC 4-9-070, Environmental Review
Procedures.
5. Existing and Ongoing Agricultural Activities: Clearing associated with existing and
ongoing agricultural activities as defined in chapter 4-11 RMC, Definitions.
6. Commercial Nurseries or Tree Farms: RemovalClearing or cutting _of only those trees
which are planted and growing on the premises of a licensed retailer or wholesaler.
7. Public Road Expansion: Expansion of public roads, unless critical areas would be
affected, in which case see subsections C12 and C13 of this Section.
8. Site Investigative Work: Site investigative work necessary for land use application
submittals such as surveys, soil logs, percolation tests, and other related activities including
the use of mechanical equipment to perform site investigative work provided the work is
conducted in accordance with the following requirements:
7
a. Investigative work should not disturb any more than five percent (5%) of any protected
sensitive area described in subsection D2 of this Section, Restrictions for Critical Areas,
on the subject property. In every case, impacts shall be minimized and disturbed areas
restored.
b. In every location where site investigative work is conducted, disturbed areas shall be
minimized, and immediately restored.
c. A notice shall be posted on the site by the property owner or owner's agent indicating
that site investigative work is being conducted, and that the work must minimize
disturbance to the critical areas identified in subsection D2 of this Section, Restrictions for
Critical Areas.
d. No site investigative work shall commence without first notifying the Director or his or
her designee in advance.
9. Allowable Minor Tree C~ttiAgRemoval Activities: Except as provided in subsection D2
of this Section, Restrictions for Critical Areas, and except for the removal of trees retained as
part of an tree retention plan, tree Tree cutting removal and associated use of mechanical
equipment is permitted as follows,excepl·as-provieed in subsection D2 of this Section,
Restrictions for Critical Areas:
a. On a Elevelo~ee let er en a paHially·eevelej3eGany lot less than ons half (1,12) af an
asre4,500 square feet, any number of trees may be removed;
b. On a partially dsvelopse lot greater than ane half (112) ef an acre 4,500 square feet or
qreateran an uneevelopee lot; provided, that:
i.·.No more than three (3) trees are removed in any twelve (12) month period from a
property under tAirly five thoosaoo.{35,OOO) square leelone (1) acre in size; and
ii. No more than six (6) trees are removed in any twelve (12) month period from a
property tAirty five IAeusand (.5,000) s£luare feetone (1) acre and greater in size .
r··-· t f'.'o. .... ttAJ.I • ."
.. =rt
llL...Iil. Rights·of·Way Unobstructed: In conducting minor tree GUttiRgremoval
activities, rights-of-way shall not be obstructed unless a right-ol-way use permit is
obtained.
c. Removal of retained trees subject to a tree retention plan is subject to the
Replacement requirements in subsection H1e.
10. Landscaping or Gardening Permitted:
8
Land Glearin§ in eenierFA3nGe with tho ~revisiens el s~13seGlien CO el tAis SeGtion,
Allewa13le Miner Tree C~tting Activities, ami s~9seGtien [)2, RestriGtiens lor Critical
Areas, is ~erFAilted en a develeped let ler ~~r~eses ef landsGa~in€l er €larr:!enin€l.
Land clearing in conformance with the provisions of subsection C9, Allowable Minor
Tree ClittingRemoval Activities, and subsection D2 of this Section, Restrictions for
Critical Areas, is permitted orHlpartially de\'ele~ed er undevele~ed let for purposes
of landscaping or gardening; provided, that no mechanical equipment is used.
11. Operational Mining/Quarrying: Land clearing and tree GUttiA§removal associated with
previously approved, operational mining and quarrying activities.
12. Modification of Existing Utilities and Streets (net etheFwise exem~ted 13y RMC 4 3
050C7) by Ten Percent (10%) or Lessi-See RMC 4 3 QaQC fer eenditiens.
13. Utilities, Traffic Control, Walkways, Bikeways Within Existing, Improved Right-of-
Way or Easements: Within existing improved public road rights-of-way or easements,
installation, construction, replacement, operation, overbuilding, or alteration of all natural gas,
cable, communication, telephone and electric facilities, lines, pipes, mains, equipment or
appurtenances, traffic control devices, illumination, walkways and bikeways. If activities
exceed the existing improved area or the public right-of-way, this exemption does not apply.
WAere a~pliGa9Ie, Rrestoration of disturbed areas shall be completed. (Ord. 4851,8-27-2000;
Ord. 5132, 4-4-2005; Ord. 5137,4-25-2005)
D. PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES:
1. Prohibited Activities: There shall be no tree cutting removal or land clearing on any site
for the sake of preparing that site for future development unless a land development permit.
as defined in RMC 4-8-120 D 12 for the site has been approved by the City.
2. Restrictions for Critical Areas -General: Unless exempted by critical areas, RMC 4-3-
050C5 or Shoreline Master Program regulations, RMC 4-3-090, no tree GUttiA§removal, or
land clearing, or groundcover management is permitted:
a. On portions of property with protected critical habitats, per RMC 4-3-050K; streams
and lakes, per RMC 4-3-050L; Shorelines of the State, per RMC 4-3-090, Renton
Shoreline Master Program Regulations; and wetlands, per RMC 4-3-050M; and their
associated buffers;
b. On protected slopes except as allowed in this Section or in the Critical Areas
Regulation, RMC 4-3-050; or
c. Areas classified as very high landslide hazards, except as allowed in this Section or in
the Critical Areas Regulations, RMC 4-3-050.
Butler requireFAents GAall be censist.",t with·tne critical area reE!lIlatiens. Tree cutlinE! or lanr:!
Giearin€l sAall 13e censistent '.vitA established-native €lFO'Nth ~retectien area req~ireFAents el
RMC 4 3050104.
3. Restrictions for Native Growth Protection Areas: Tree e~ltin€l removal or land clearing
shall not be permitted within a native growth protection area except as provided in the
established native growth protection area requirements of RMC 4-3-050E4. be Gensistent
with establisher:! native gHl'lllh pretectian area reqllireFAents of RMC 4 3 Q5QE4. (Ord. 5137,
4-25-2005)
9
i
E. AUTHORITY ANI) INTERPRETATION REVIEW AUTHORITY:
1. Authority and Interpretation: The City's Development Services Division Director, or his
duly authorized representative, is hereby authorized and directed to interpret and enforce all
the provisions of this Section. (Ord. 5137, 4-25-2005)
2. Independent Secondary Review: The City's Development Services Director. or a duly
authorized representation, may require independent review of any land use application that
involves tree removal and land clearing at the City's discretion. An evaluation by an
independent qualified professional reqarding the applicant's analysis on the effectiveness of
any proposed removal, retention. or replacement measures, to include recommendations as
appropriate. This shall be paid at the applicant's expense and the City shall select the third
party review professional.
F. PERMITS REQUIRED:
1. Land Development Permit: An approved land development permit, as defined in RMC 4-
8-120 D 12, is required in order to conduct tree e~ItiA€l removal or land clearing on any site
for the sake of preparing that site for future development.
2. Permit Required for Routine Vegetation Management on Undeveloped Properties:
Any person who performs routine vegetation management, as defined in RMC 4-11-180, on
undeveloped property in the City must obtain a routine vegetation management permit prior
to performing such work.
3. Permit Required to Use Mechanical Equipment: Except where use of mechanical
equipment is specifically listed as exempt. any person who uses mechanical equipment for
routine vegetation management, land clearing, tree GI.IltiR9removal, landscaping, or
gardening on developed, partially developed or undeveloped property must obtain a routine
vegetation management permit prior to performing such work.
4. Timber Stand Maintenance -Conditional Use Permit Required: While timber
harvesting shall not be permitted until such time as a valid land development is approved, a
request may be made for maintenance and thinning of existing timber stands to promote the
overall health and growth of the stand. Permits allowing maintenance and thinning beyond
the limits allowed in subsections subsection C9 of this Section, Allowable Minor Tree GulliAg
Removal Activities, shall be considered as a conditional use permit by the Hearing Examiner
according to the following criteria in lieu of standard conditional use permit criteria:
a. Appropriate approvals have been sought and obtained with the State Department of
Natural Resources; and
b. The activity shall improve the health and growth of the stand and maintain long-term
alternatives for preservation of trees; and
c. The activity shall meet the provisions of subsections H2, Applicability, Performance
Standards and Alternates, and H3, General Review Criteria, of this Section; and
d. Thinning activities shall be limited to less than forty percent (40%) of the volume and
trees.
5. Tree Cutting Removal -Solar Access or Pasture Land: A routine vegetation
management permit is required for tree &UtliA§-removal in greater amounts than specified
10
under partially exempt actions in subsection C9 of this Section, Allowable Minor Tree Cutting
Removal Activities, for any property where tree GOltting removal is proposed without an
associated land development permit. A routine vegetation management permit may be issued
allowing tree GtIItiRgremoval only in the following cases:
a. For purposes of allowing solar access to existing sirOlGluressolar energy panels, or to
structures that specifically incorporate solar energy in to the building design; or
b. To create pasture land where agricultural activities are permitted uses in the zone.
Any tree GOltting removal activities shall be the minimum necessary to acccmplish the
purpose, and shall be consistent with subsection D2 of this Section, Restrictions for Critical
Areas. (Ord. 5137, 4-25-2005)
G. ROUTINE VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PERMIT REVIEW PROCESS:
Permits for routine vegetation management shall be processed consistent with RMC 4-9-195,
Routine Vegetation Management Permits. (Amd. Ord. 4963, 5-13-2002; Ord. 5137, 4-25-2005)
H. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT/BUILDING PERMITS:
1. Protected Trees-Retention Required: Trees shall be retained as follows:
a. Damaged and diseased trees excluded: Trees that are damaged or diseased or are
safety risks due to root. trunk or crown structure failure shall not be counted as protected
trees.
b. Residential: Twenty-five percent of the trees located on the lot, or a minimum of twenty
five trees per acre. which ever is greater, shall be considered protected and retained in a
residential or institutional development. Critical areas and their buffers shall be excluded
from this calculation. but trees in proposed street right of ways and easements shall be
counted. If the number to be retained includes a fraction of a tree. any amount equal to
or greater than one-half tree (1/2) shall be rounded up:
c. Industrial and Commercial: Five percent of the trees located on the lot, excluding
critical areas or their buffers shall be considered protected and retained in commercial or
industrial developments. Critical areas and their buffers shall be excluded from this
calculation. but trees in proposed street right of ways and easements shall be counted. If
the number to be retained includes a fraction of a tree. any amount equal to or greater
than one-half tree (1/2) shall be rounded up;
d. Utility uses and mineral extraction uses: such operations shall be exempt from the
protected tree retention requirements of this chapter if removal can be justified in writing
and approved by the Reviewing Official.;
e. Replacement Requirements:
i. When the required number of protected trees cannot be retained. new trees. with
a two inch (2") caliper or greater. shall be planted. The replacement rate shall be
twelve (12) caliper inches of new trees to replace each protected tree removed:
ii. When a tree or tree cluster that is part of an approved tree retention plan cannot
be retained. mitigation shall be required per subsection i. above.
11
iii. Trees used to meet these replacement requirements may not be counted toward
the required landscaping requirements in RMC 4-4-070.
iv. Unless replacement trees are being used as part of an enhancement project in a
critical area or buffer, they shall not consist of any species listed in RMC 4-4-130
H7d.
f. Replanting Requirements: Residential sites that can not meet the minimum requirement
of 25 trees per acre, as specified in RMC 4-4-130 H1b, shall be replanted according to
the replacement requirements in RMC 4-4-130 H1e
LPlan Required: When a land development permit, as defined in RMC 4-8-120 012, is
submitted to the City it shall be accompanied by a tree CYttiA§ removaland land clearing plan.
VIlhers it is Aet tlracticalale te retain all~rses OA site dYe to a preposed developmeAt, the plaA
shall ideAtify tAese trees WAiGh are proposed for remeval.
Where the srip line ef a tree overlaps an arBa where censlrYction activities will OGGyr, this
sA all Iae iASiGates OA the plan. Trees-shall-oosAowA eA the plan as tellews:
a. fOer alle'll8s activities, inclydillfj allowed exemptions, medilieations, aAd variances,
sAow all trees proposes la Ils Guj..jflpriOOty tree relsntiaA areas: slepes tweAty five
perGent (28%) ta thirty AiAe p8rG8At(3~'Vo), hi~h er '.ery high laAsslise areas, and hi!lh
eresian Aazard areas.
Ia. SAOW trees ta ge Cyt in pretectedGfitical areas: wetlands, SRarelines of tRe Slate,
streams aAEIlakes, floodways, floodplain slopes terty percent (4Q%) or !lreater, very high
landsliae hazara areas, ans Gr~iBal-lle9itat if the acti,.ity is exempt er allo...,eEl lay tAe
critical areas re!lulations in RMG-4--3--0&()C5, Specific Exemplisns.
G, SAew all !Fees \0 Iae retained in ~ritiGal area Iauffers.
d. Shew trees preposo9 la e9 cutwithin require9 zoning setlaaGI(s aleng perimeter ef
de'lelel'lment.
e. In all otAer areas sf IAe sito,tfees te e9 Gut may Iae inElicalea !lenerally WitA alearin!l
limit lines, (,,"ms. Ora. 4Qe3, a 132002; OrE!. 6137, 4 2§ 2QQa)
2;!. Applicability, Performance Standards and Alternates: All land clearing and tree
Gullin!l removal activities shall conform to the criteria and performance standards set forth in
this Section unless otherwise recommended in an approved soil engineering, engineering
geology, hydrology or forest management plan and where the alternate procedures will be
equal to or superior in achieving the policies of this Section. All land clearing and tree
cutIiIlfJremoval activities may be conditioned to ensure that the standards, criteria, and
purpose of this Section are met.
31. General Review Criteria: All land clearing and tree cutIiIlfJremoval activities shall comply
with RMC 4-4-060 Grading, Excavation, and Mining Regulations, and shall meet the following
criteria:
a, The land clearing and tree GUlling-removal will not create or siijnilicantly contribute to
landslides, accelerated soil creep, settlement and subsidence or hazards associated with
strong ground motion and soil liquefaction.
12
b. The land clearing and tree ~removal will not create or significanlly contribute to
fiooding, erosion, or increased turbidity, siltation or other form of pollution in a
watercourse.
c. Land clearing and tree GHltjngremoval will be conducted to maintain or provide visual
screening and buffering between land uses of differing intensity, consistent with
applicable landscaping and setback provisions of the Renton Municipal Code.
d. Land clearing and tree GHltingremoval shall be conducted so as to expose the smallest
practical area of soil to erosion for the least possible time, consistent with an approved
build-out schedule and including any necessary erosion control measures.
e. Land clearing and tree ~removal shall be consistent with subsection D2 of this
Section, Restrictions for Critical Areas, and RMC 4-3-050, Critical Areas Regulations.
f. Retained trees will not create or contribute to a hazardous condition as the result of
blowdown. insect or pest infestation, disease, or other problems that may be created as a
result of selectively removing trees and other vegetation from a lot.
4. Tree Preservation: Trees shalloomajntamed to the ma*imum elaent feasible on the
property whore they are growing.
a. Ability to Condition Plan: The -City may require a modification 01 the land clearing
ana tree cutting plan or the as&OGiated.Ja+1d develo",ment Fllan to ensure the retention of
tRe maximum number of trees.
b. Clearing Conditions of Approval: The Department Administrator or desi(jnee may
cendition a ",reposal to restrict· clearing outside of building sites, rights of way, utility lines
ana easements, to require sequencing and Flhasin(j of construction, or other measures,
consistent 'NitR the permitted d6f\Sit.y-aOO intensity of the zone.
52. Timing: The City may restrict the timing of the land clearing and tree ~removal
activities to specific dates andlor seasons when such restrictions are necessary for the public
health, safety and welfare, or for the protection of the environment.
G.!!. Restrictions for Critical Areas: See subsection D2 of this Section, Restrictions for
Critical Areas -General, and RMC 4-3-050, Critical Areas Regulations.
'II. Tree/Ground Cover Retention: The following measures may be used by the Department
/\dministrator or dosi(jneeReviewinq Official in conditioning a land development permit or
building permit proposal per su9section·t#-of.jhis Section, Tree Preservatien, to comply with
the general review criteria of subsection H3H4:_
a. Trees shall be maintained to the maximum extent feasible on the property where they
are growing. The Reviewing Official may require modification of the tree retention and
land clearing plan. or the associated land development permits, to ensure the retention of
the maximum number of trees.
13
b. The Gity-Reviewing Official may require amlier allaw the applicant to releGate ar
replace trees, provide interim erosion control, hydroseed exposed soils, or other similar
conditions which would implement the intent of this Section.
G. Priarity sRalille Ili\'en te reteAtien-ef trees en sensitive slepes and en lanss Glassifies
as havina hi§R er very hillR landsJige...hazaras, er Ri§h eresien hazards as Glassifiea in the
Grill Gal areas re§ulatiens.
6£. Where feasiiJle, trees Trees that shelter interior trees or trees on abutting properties
from strong winds that could otherwise cause them to blow down should be retained.
99.. Except in critical areas or their buffers, unless enhancement activities are being
performed, the removal of trees on the following list should be allowed in order to avoid
invasive root systems, weak wood prone to breakage, or varieties which tend to harbor
insect pests:
i. All Populus species including cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa), quaking aspen
(Populus tremuloides), lombardy poplar (Populus nigra "Italica"), etc.
ii. All Alnus species which includes red alder (Alnus oregon a), black alder (Alnus
glutinosa), white alder (Alnus rhombifolia), etc.
iii. Salix species which includes weeping willow (Salix babylonica), etc., unless along
a stream iJank am:! av,'ay frerTl-f)aved-afe8&.
iv. All Platanus species which include London plane tree (Platanus acerifolia),
American sycamore, buttonwood (Platanus occidental is), etc.
8l!, Protection Measures During Construction:
a. Tree PromGtion Measures: Protection measures in this subsections ~8iJ(i) threullh ~8iJ(vi)
et this SeGtien shall apply for all trees which are to be retained in areas immediately subject
to construction._ These requirements·maybe waived pursuant te RMC 4 9 2€iQg, MedifiGatian
PreGedures, individually er se'/erally by the City if the develeper demanstrates them ta iJe
inaplllisaiJle te the SlleGifiG an site oeFlGitions or if the intent at the rellulatians williJe
imlliementes iJy an ather means with the same result.
b. grip bine: All of the following tree proteGlier\safequarding measures shall apply:
i§.Construction storage prohibited: -The applicant may not fill, excavate, stack or
store any equipment, dispose of any materials, supplies or fluids, operate any
eqUipment. install impervious surfaces, or compact the earth in any way within the
area defined by the drip line of any tree to be retained.
iill.. Fenced protection area required: The applicant shall erect and maintain six-foot-
high chainlinkand maintainfOpe-Oar~temporary construction fencing around the
drip lines of all retained trees, or along the perimeter of a stand of retained trees. ,-{)!'
IllaGe iJales at hay en tRe drip line Ie preteGt reets. Placards shall be placed on
fencing every fifty feet (50') indicating the words, "NO TRESSPASSING· Protected
Trees" or on each side of the fencing if less than fifty feet (50'). Side access to
individually protected trees or groups of trees shall be fenced and signed. Individual
trees shall be fenced on four sides. In addition, the applicant shall provide
supervision whenever equipment or trucks are moving near trees.
14
iH!;;. Protection from grade changes: If the grade level adjoining to a tree to be
retained is to be raised, the applicant shall construct a dry rock wall or rock well
around the tree. The diameter of this wall or well must be equal to the tree's drip line.
ivQ. Impervious surfaces prohibited within the drip line: The applicant may not install
impervious surface material within the area defined by the drip line of any tree to be
retained.
~. Restrictions on grading within the drip lines of retained trees: The grade level
around any tree to be retained may not be lowered within the greater of the following
areas: (1) the area defined by the drip line of the tree, or (2) an area around the tree
equal to one and a half feet (1 \1,') fool in diameter for each one inch of tree caliper.
The Reviewing Official may require a larger tree protection zone based on tree size,
species, soil. or other conditions.
vi!. Mulch layer required: All areas within the required fencinq shall be covered
completely and evenly with a minimum of three inches (3") of bark mulch prior to
installation of the protective fencing. Exceptions may be approved by the Reviewing
Official if the mulch will adversely affect protected groundcover plants.
g. Monitoring required during construction: The applicant shall retain a professional arborist or
a other qualified professional to prune branches and roots, fertilize, and water as appropriate
for any trees and ground cover which are to be retained. (Ord. 5137, 4-25-2005)
h Alternative protection: Alternative safeguards may be used if determined by the Reviewinq
Official to provide equal or greater tre~rotection.
9. Maintenance
a. All retained trees, including protected trees, shall be maintained for the life of the project:
b. All retained trees and vegetation shall be pruned and trimmed to maintain a healthy
growing condition or to prevent limb failure;
c. With the exception of dead. diseased, or damaged trees specifically retained to provide
wildlife habitat; other dead, diseased, damaged or stolen planting shall be replaced within
three months or during the next planting season if the loss does not occur in a planting
season;
10. Bonds/security
a. Perfonmance bonds or other appropriate security (including letters of credit and set aside
letters) shall be reguired for a period of three years after the planting or transplanting of
vegetation to insure proper installation, establishment and maintenance.
b. Performance Donds or other appropriate security (including letters of credit and set aside
letters) may be required if protected trees are damaged but remain in acceptable condition,
for a period of time related to the damage caused, as determined by the Reviewing Official.
15
I. VARIANCE PROCEDURES:
The Hearing Examiner shall have the authority to grant variances from the provisions of this
Section pursuant to RMC 4-8-070H and the decision criteria in RMC 4-9-250. (Ord. 5137, 4-25-
2005)
J!. VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES:
1. Penalties: Penalties for any violation of any of the provisions of this Section shall be in
accord with RMC 1-3-2. In a prosecution under this Section, each tree removed, damaged or
destroyed will constitute a separate violation, and the monetary penalty for each violated tree
shall be no less than the minimum penalty. and no greater than the maximum penalty of RMC
1-3-2D.
2. Additional Liability for Damage: In addition, any person who violates any provision of
this Section or of a permit issued pursuant thereto shall be liable for all damages to public or
private property arising from such violation, including the cost of restoring the affected area to
its condition prior to such violation.
3. Restoration Required: The City may require replacement of all improperly removed
ground cover with species similar to those which were removed or other approved species
such that the biological and habitat values will be replaced. Restoration shall include
installation and maintenance of interim and emergency erosion control measures that shall
be required as determined by the City.
4. Replacement Required: The City may require, for each tree that was improperly cut
andlor removed in violation of, or without, an approved tree retention and land clearing plan,
replacement planting of a tree of equal size, quality and species or up to three (3) trees of the
same species in the immediate vicinity of the tree(s) that was removed. The replacement
trees will be of sufficient caliper to adequately replace the lost tree(s) OF, and at -a minimum
of tRfee-two inches ~£") in caliper.
5. Stop Work: For any parcel on wh ich trees andlor ground cover are improperly removed
and subject to penalties under this Section, the City shall stop work on any existing permits
and halt the issuance of any or all future permits or approvals until the property is fully
restored in compliance with this Section and all penalties are paid. (Ord. 4219, 6-5-1989;
Amd. Ord. 4835, 3-27-2000; Ord. 5137, 4-25-2005)
4-7-130 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION -GENERAL REQUIREMENTS AND
MINIMUM STANDARDS:
A PURPOSE:
It is the purpose of this Section to provide for the protection of valuable, irreplaceable
environmental amenities and to make urban development as compatible as possible with the
ecological balance of the area. Goals are to preserve drainage patterns, protect groundwater
supply, prevent erosion and to preserve trees and natural vegetation. This is beneficial to the
City in lessening the costs of the development to the City as a whole, and to the subdivider in
creating an attractive and healthy environment.
16
B ACTION NOT A TAKING:
No action taken herein shall constitute a taking under the laws or constitution of the State or
Federal government.
C ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS:
A plat, short plat, subdivision or dedication shall be prepared in conformance with the
following provisions:
1. Land Unsuitable for Subdivision: Land which is found to be unsuitable for subdivision
includes land with features likely to be harmful to the safety and general health of the future
residents (such as lands adversely affected by flooding, steep slopes, or rock formations).
Land which the Department or the Hearing Examiner considers inappropriate for subdivision
shall not be subdivided unless adequate safeguards are provided against these adverse
conditions.
a. Flooding/Inundation: If any portion of the land within the boundary of a preliminary plat is
subject to flooding or inundation, that portion of the subdivision must have the approval of the
State according to chapter 86.16 RCW before the Department and the Hearing Examiner
shall consider such subdivision.
b. Steep Slopes: A plat, short plat, subdivision or dedication which would result in the
creation of a lot or lots that primarily have slopes forty percent (40%) or greater as measured
per RMC 4-3-050J1a, without adequate area at lesser slopes upon which development may
occur, shall not be approved. (Amd. Ord. 4835, 3-27-2000)
2. Native Growth Protection Area Easement and Minimum Lot Size: Native growth
protection area easements may be included in the minimum lot size of lots created through
the subdivision process; provided, that the area of the lot outside of the easement is sufficient
to allow for adequate buildable area and yards. (Ord. 4835, 3-27-2000)
3. Land Clearing and Tree Retentions: l'?easonable effort shall be made to preserve existing
trees. (Ams. Ord. 48J§, a 27 2QOO) Shall comply with RMC 4-4-130 Tree Retention and Land
Clearing.
4. Streams:
a. Preservation: Every reasonable effort shall be made to preserve existing streams, bodies
of water, and wetland areas.
b. Method: If a stream passes through any of the subject property, a plan shall be presented
which indicates how the stream will be preserved. The methodologies used should include an
overflow area, and an attempt to minimize the disturbance of the natural channel and stream
bed.
c. Culverting: The piping or tunneling of water shall be discouraged and allowed only when
going under streets.
d. Clean Water: Every effort shall be made to keep all streams and bodies of water clear of
debris and pollutants. (Amd. Ord. 4835, 3-27-2000)
17
TABLE 4-8-120 A
Une under Submittal Requirements: Tree Gtll1ifl§ Removal/Inventory/ Land Clearing Plan-
Approved
TABLE 4-8-120 B
Une under Submmal Requirements: Tree ~Removal/inventory/ Land Clearing Plan-
Approved
TABLE 4-8-120C
Submittal Requirement-Tree GuttingRetentionNegetation Plan
TYPE OF APPLICATION/PERMIT
Annexation (10% Notice of Intent)
Annexation (60% Petition)
Appeal
Business License for Home Occupation1
Compo Plan Map Amendment/Rezone
Compo Plan Text Amendment
Conditional Approval Permit for a Nonconforming Structure
Conditional Approval Permit for a Nonconforming Use
4 Conditional Use Permit (Administrative)
4 Conditional Use Permit (Hearing Examiner)
4 Environmental Review
Environmental Review (Nonproject)
4 Grade and Fill Permit (Spacial)
Kannel license
Kennel License, Hobby
Lot Line Adjustment
4 Master Site Plan (Overall)
4 Master Site Plan (Individual Phases)!
4 Mobile Home Park, Preliminary
4 Mobile Home Park, Final
Modification/Alternate Request
4 Plat, Final
4 Plat, Preliminary/Binding Site Plan
4 PUD, Preliminary
4 PUD, Final
Rebuild Approval Permit for a Nonconforming Structure
Rebuild Approval Pennit for a Nonconforming Use
Rezone
4 Routine Vegetation Management Permit
Shoreline Exemption
4 Shoreline Substantial Development Permit
4 Shoreline Conditional Use Permit
4 Shoreline Variance
4 Short Plat, Preliminary
4 Short Plat, Final/Binding Site Plan
4 Site Plan
4 Special Permit
4 Temporary Use Permit
Variance
Waiver
4 Critical Area Permit
4-8-120D DEFINITIONS OF TERMS USED IN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
BUILDING, PLANNING AND PUBLIC WORKS APPLICATIONS
18
6. Definitions F:
Final Plat Plan: The final plat or final short subdivision map (for short subdivisions of five (5)
or more lots) shall be drawn to a scale of not less than one inch representing one hundred
feet (1" = 100¢) unless otherwise approved by the Department. and on sheets eighteen
inches by twenty four inches (18" x 24" ). The original reproducible drawing shall be in black
ink on stabilized drafting film. and shall:
a. Include the date. title. name and location of subdivision. graphic scale. and north arrow.
b. Include names. locations. widths and other dimensions of existing and proposed streets.
alleys. easements. parks. open spaces and reservations.
c. Include lot lines with all property lines dimensioned and square footage of each lot.
d. Include location. dimensions. and square footage of any existing structures to remain
within or abutting the plat.
e. Include location of existing conditions (such as wetlands. steep slopes. watercourses.
floodplains) on or adjacent to the site which could hinder development. (Amd. Ord. 4835. 3-
27-2000)
f. Include reservations. restrictive covenants. easements (including easement language). and
any areas to be dedicated to public use. with notes stating their purpose and any limitations.
If a new easement is created on the plat. it must show the grantee of the easement rights. If
the grantee is the City. a slatement of easement provisions reserving. granting and conveying
the easement. with a description of the rights and purposes need to be made on the plat.
g. Include the lot and block numbering scheme and lot addresses on the plat map. Street
names and addresses shall be determined by the Department in accordance with the Street
Grid Ordinance (chapter 9-11 RMC), and established Department procedures for addressing
of new lots. (Amd. Ord. 4835. 3-27-2000)
h. Include the location and species of all trees retained or replaced in accordance with an
approved Tree Retention Plan with a note stating that removal or replacement of such trees
is subject to the reguirements of the Renton Municipal Code.
LConlain data sufficient to determine readily and reproduce on the ground the location.
bearing. and length of every street. easement line. lot line. boundary line and block line on-
site. Shall include dimensions to the nearest one-hundredth (1/100) of a foot and angles and
bearings in degrees. minutes. and seconds.
ii. Include coordinates per City surveying standards for permanent control monuments.
it Display all interior permanent control monuments located per City surveying standards.
kl. Be mathematically correct.
1m. Contain a legal description of the land to be subdivided on the final mylar.
mQ. Include certifications:
19
in. Certification showing that streets, rights-of-way and all sites for public use have been
dedicated.
ii. Certification by a licensed land surveyor that a survey has been made and that monuments
and stakes will be set.
iii. Certification by the responsible health agencies that the methods of sewage disposal and
water service are acceptable.
iv. Certification by the King County Finance Department that taxes have been paid in
accordance with section 1, chapter No. 188, Laws of 1927 (RCW 58.08.030 and 58.08.040)
and that a deposit has been made with the King County Finance Department in sufficient
amount to pay the taxes for the following year.
v. Certification by the City Finance Department that there are no delinquent special
assessments and that all special assessments certified to the City Treasurer for collection on
any property herein contained dedicated for streets, alleys or other public uses are paid in
full.
vi. Certification of approval to be signed by the Administrator.
vii. Certification of approval to be signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk.
7. Definitions G:
Grading Plan: A twenty two inch by thirty four inch (22" x 34") plan drawn by a State of
Washington licensed landscape architect at a scale of one inch to forty feet (1" to 40')
(horizontal feet) and one inch to ten feet (1" to 10') (vertical feet) (or other size plan sheet or
scale approved by the Development Service Division Plan Review Supervisor) clearly
indicating the following:
a. Graphic scale and north arrow.
b. Dimensions of all property lines, easements, and abutting streets,
c. Location and dimension of all on-site structures and the location of any structures
within fifteen feet (15') of the subject property or which may be affected by the proposed
work,
d. Accurate existing and proposed contour lines drawn a five foot (5'), or less, intervals
showing existing ground and details of terrain and area drainage to include surrounding
off-site contours within one hundred feet (100') of the site,
e. Location of natural drainage system, including perennial and intermittent streams, the
presence of bordering vegetation, and flood plains.
f. Setback areas and any areas not be disturbed, including the location. size and species
of all protected trees on site. Protected trees shall have the approximate drip line shown.
The method of tree protection during grading and construction shall be shown. If grade
changes in the vicinity of the protected trees are necessary. the method of reconciling the
drop line with the finished elevation shall be included (see RMC 4-4-130 Tree Retention
and Land Clearing Regulations);
g. Finished contours drawn at five foot (5') intervals as a result of grading,
20
h. Proposed drainage channels and related construction with associated underground
storm lines sized and connections shown, and
i. General notes addressing the following (may be listed on the cover sheet):
i. Area in square feet of the entire property.
ii. Area of work in square feel.
iii. Both the number of tons and cubic yards of soil to be added, removed, or
relocated.
iv. Type and location of fill origin, and destination of any soil to be removed from site.
v. Finished floor elevation(s) of all structures, existing and proposed.
12. Definitions L:
Landscaping Plan, Conceptual: A fully dimensioned plan, prepared by a landscape
architect registered in the State of Washington, a certified nurseryman, or other similarly
qualified professional, drawn at the same scale as the project site plan (or other scale
approved by the Reviewing Official), clearly indicating the following:
a. Date, graphic scale, and north arrow,
b. Location of proposed buildings, parking areas, access and existing buildings to remain,
c. Names and locations of abutting streets and public improvements, including
easements,
d. Existing and proposed contours at five foot (5') intervals or less,
e. Location,-aAG-size, and purpose of planting areas, including those reguired in RMC 4-
4-070 Landscaping:
f. Location and height for proposed berming,
g. Location and elevations for any proposed landscape-related structures such as arbors,
gazebos, fencing, etc., aAd
h. Location, size, spacing and names of existing and proposed shrubs, trees, ground
covers, and decorative rockery or like landscape improvements in relationship to
proposed and existing utilities,~ (Ord. 5100, 11-1-2004)
i. The location, size and species of all protected trees on site. Protected trees shall have
the approximate drip line shown (see RMC 4-4-130 Tree Retention and Land Clearing
Regulations).
Landscaping Plan, Detailed: A fully dimensioned plan, prepared by a landscape architect
registered in the State of Washington, a certified nurseryman, or other similarly qualified
21
professional, drawn at the same scale as the project site plan (or other scale approved by the
Reviewing Official), clearly indicating the following:
a. Date, graphic scale, and north arrow,
b. Location of proposed buildings, property lines, walks, parking areas, and access, and
existing buildings to remain,
c. Names and locations of abutting streets and public improvements, including
easements,
d. Existing and proposed contours at five-foot (5') intervals or less,
e. Detailed grading plan,
f. Location.-aAd-dimensions, and purpose of i!!Lplanting areas (the width of a landscaping
area when curbed shall be measured from inside to inside of the curbs),including those
required in RMC 4-4-070 Landscaping:
g. Location and height for proposed berming,
h. Locations, elevations, and details for any proposed landscape-related structures such
as arbors, gazebos, fencing, etc.,
i. Location, size, spacing and names of existing and proposed shrubs, trees, ground
covers, and decorative rockery or like landscape improvements in relationship to
proposed and existing utilities,
j. The location, size and species of all protected trees on site. Protected trees shall have
the approximate drip line shown (see RMC 4-4-130 Tree Retention and Land Clearing
Regulations).
iii. Names of existing and proposed vegetation, and
k]. Detailed planting plan (soil mix, planting depth and width, and bark mulch depth). (Ord.
5100,11-1-2004)
16. DEFINITIONS P
Preliminary Plat or Binding Site Plan: A plan, with a two-inch (2" ) border on the left edge and
one-half-inch (1/2") on all other sides, prepared by a State of Washington registered land
surveyor in accordance with RCW 18.43.020 andlor chapter 58.17 RCW, fully dimensioned,
drawn at a scale of one inch equals forty feet (1" = 40¢) on an eighteen inch by twenty four inch
(18" x 24" ) plan sheet (or other size or scale approved by the Development Services Division
Director) and shall include the following:
a. Name of the proposed preliminary plat or binding site plan (and space for the future City file
numbers).
b. Names and addresses of the engineer, licensed land surveyor, and all property owners.
c. Legal description of the property to be subdivided.
22
d. Date, graphic scale, and north arrow oriented to the top of the paper/plan sheet.
e. Vicinity map (a reduced version of the neighborhood detail map as defined above).
f. Drawing of the subject property with all existing and proposed property lines dimensioned. Lots
designated by number within the area of the lot. Tracts shall be similarly designated and each
tract shall be clearly identified with the ownership and purpose. Indicate the required yards
(setbacks) with dashed lines.
g. Location of the subject site with respect to the nearest street intersections (including
intersections opposite the subject property), alleys and other rights-of-way.
h. Names, locations, types, widths and other dimensions of existing and proposed streets, alleys,
easements, parks, open spaces and reservations. (Ord. 4587, 3-18-1996)
i. Location, distances from existing and new lot lines, and dimensions of any existing and
proposed structures, existing on-site trees, existing or proposed fencing or retaining walls,
freestanding signs, and easements.
j. Location of existing conditions on or adjacent to the site which could hinder development.
k. Flood hazard information and boundary on the subdivision drawing including the nature,
location, dimensions, and elevations of the subdivided area. (Ord. 4835, 3-27-2000)
I. A legend listing the following included on the first sheet of the preliminary plat plan:
i. Total area in acres,
ii. Proposed number of lots,
iii. Zoning of the subject site,
iv. Proposed square footage in each lot, and
v. Percentage of land in streets and open space.
m. Access and Utilities: Indicate how the proposed subdivision will be served by streets and
utilities, show how access will be provided to all lots, and the location of sewer and water lines.
n. Contours and Elevations: Shall include contour and/or elevations (at five foot (5¢) vertical
intervals minimum) to the extent necessary to accurately predict drainage characteristics of the
property. Approximate, estimated contour lines shall be extended at least one hundred feet
(100¢) beyond the boundaries of the proposed plat.
o. Zoning: Shall indicate the zoning applicable to the land to be platted, subdivided or dedicated
and of the land adjacent and contiguous. (Ord. 4954, 2-11-2002)
p. Tree Retention Plan: Shall include the location, size, and species of all trees to be retained in
accordance with the requirements of RMC 4-4-130 Tree Retention and Land Clearing.
20. DEFINITIONS S
23
Short Plat or Binding Site Plan Map, Final: A plan, with a two-inch (2" ) border on the left edge
and one-half-inch (1/2" ) on all other sides, prepared by a State of Washington registered land
surveyor in accordance with RCW 18.43.010 and or chapter 58.17 RCW, fully dimensioned,
drawn at a scale of one inch equals forty feet (1" = 40¢) on eighteen inch by twenty four inch (18"
x 24" ) plan sheet(s) (or other scale approved by the Development Services Division Director).
The reproducible original shall be in black ink on stabilized drafting film and shall include the
following:
a. Name and location of the short plat or binding site plan,
b. Space reserved for "City of Renton file number" (large type) at top of first sheet,
c. Space reserved for City of Renton "land record number" (small type) at bottom left of first
sheet,
d. Legal description of the property,
e. Date, graphic scale, and north arrow,
f. Vicinity map (a reduced version of the "neighborhood detail map" as defined above),
g. Names, locations, widths and other dimensions of existing and proposed streets, alleys,
easements, parks, open spaces and reservations. Shall show all utilities, streets, existing and
new easements and associated covenants within or abutting the short plat. If a new easement is
created on the plat, it must show grantee of easement rights. If the grantee is the City, a
statement of easement provisions reserving and conveying the easement, with a description of
the rights and purposes, needs to be made on the short plat,
h. Lots designated by number within the area of the lot. Tracts shall be similarly designated and
each tract shall be clearly identified with the ownership and purpose. Lot lines with all property
lines dimensioned and square footage of each lot,
i. Lot numbers,
j. Include the location and species of all trees retained or replaced in accordance with an
approved Tree Retention Plan with a note stating that removal or replacement of such trees is
subject to the requirements of the Renton Municipal Code.
LAddresses for each lot and new street names determined by the Department in accordance
with the street grid system regulations of chapter 9-11 RMC,
[k. Reservations, restrictive covenants, easements and any areas to be dedicated to public use
with notes stating their purpose, and any limitations, and identifying the grantee. If the grantee is
the City, a statement of provisions reserving, granting and/or conveying the area with a
description of the rights and purposes must be shown,
ml. Coordinates per City surveying standards for permanent control monuments,
D.ffi. All interior permanent control monuments located per City surveying standards,
QR. Statement of equipment and procedure used per WAC 332-130-100,
24
QB. Basis for bearing per WAC 332-130-150(1 )(b)(iii),
gil. Date the existing monuments were visited per WAC 332-1 03-050( 1 )(f)(iv),
[(I. Verification that permanent markers are set at corners of the proposed lots,
l>f. Statement of discrepancies, if any, between bearing and distances of record and those
measured or calculated,
ls. Location, dimensions and square footage of any existing structures to remain within or
abutting the plat,
jJl. Location of existing conditions (such as wetlands, steep slopes, watercourses) on or adjacent
to the site which could hinder development,
yll. Reference to all agreements or covenants required as a condition of approval,
':!'f'I. For binding site plans only: provisions requiring site development to be in conformity with the
approved binding site plan,
'!!N. Certifications by:
i. A State of Washington licensed land surveyor that a survey has been made and that
monuments and stakes have been set,
ii. The King County Department of Health that the proposed septic system(s) is acceptable to
serve the plat if not served by sewer,
x. Signature and date line for:
i. All property owners (signatures must be notarized with an ink stamp),
ii. The King County Assessor,
iii. The City of Renton Finance and Information Systems Director with the following text
preceding: "There are no delinquent special assessments and any special assessments for any
dedicated property herein contained have been paid in full", and
iv. The Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department. (Ord. 4954, 2-11-2002)
Short Plat Map, Preliminary: A fully dimensioned plan, drawn at a scale of one inch equals forty
feet (1" = 40¢) on an eighteen inch by twenty four inch (18" x 24" ) plan sheet (or other size or
scale approved by the Development Services Division Director) and including the following
information:
a. Name of the proposed short plat (and space for the future City file number);
b. Names and addresses of the engineer, I icensed land surveyor, and all property owners;
c. Legal description of the property;
25
d. Date, graphic scale, and north arrow oriented to the top of the paper/plan sheet;
e. Vicinity map (a reduced version of the "neighborhood detail map" as defined above);
f. A drawing of the subject property with all existing and proposed property lines dimensioned,
indicating the required yards (setbacks) with dashed lines;
g. Location of the subject site with respect to the nearest street intersections (including
intersections opposite the subject property), alleys and other rights-of-way, showing how access
will be provided to all lots;
h. Names, locations, widths and other dimensions of existing and proposed streets, alleys,
easements, parks, open spaces and reservations;
i. Contours and elevations at minimum five foot (5¢) vertical intervals to the extent necessary to
predict drainage characteristics of the property. Approximate, estimated contour lines shall be
extended at least one hundred feet (100¢) beyond the boundaries of the proposed short plat;
j. Location and dimensions of any existing and proposed structures, existing on-site trees,
existing or proposed fencing or retaining walls, freestanding signs, and easements;
k. Location of existing conditions on or adjacent to the site which could hinder development;
I. Flood hazard information and boundary on the subdivision drawing including the nature,
location, dimensions, and elevations of the subdivided area; and
m. A legend listing the following included on the first sheet of the short plat plan:
i. Short plat,
ii. Proposed number of lots,
iii. Zoning of the subject site,
iv. Proposed square footage in each lot, and
v. Percentage of land in streets and open space. (Amd. Ord. 4835, 3-27-2000)
n. Tree Retention Plan: Shall include the location, size, and species of all trees to be retained in
accordance with the requirements of RMC 4-4-130 Tree Retention and Land Clearinq.
21. DEFINITIONS T
Tree CU"ingRetention/Land Clearing (Tree Inventory) Plan: A full dimensional plan,
drawn by a professional arborist, landscape architect, or other similarly qualified profeSSional.
based on finished grade, drawn !G-at the same scale as the project site plan with the northern
property line at the top of the paper clearly showing the following:
a. All property boundaries and adjacent streets,
26
b. Location of all areas proposed to be cleared,
c. ~Species and sizes of vegetation to be removed, altered or retained and~the
boundaries and predominant species of stands of trees consisting of five (5) or more
trees. This requirement applies only to trees, six inch (6") caliper, "at shest level" and
larger fifty-four inches (54") above grade, and the location, size and species of all
protected trees on the site.
d. Future building sites and drip lines of any trees which will overhang/overlap a
construction line, and
e. Location and dimensions of rights-of-way, utility lines, fire hydrants, street lighting, and
easements.
f. Where the drip line of a tree overlaps an area where construction activities will occur,
this shall be indicated on the plan.
g. For allowed activities, including allowed exemptions, modifications. and variances,
show all trees proposed to be removed in priority tree retention areas: slopes twenty five
percent (25%) to thirty nine percent (39%)' high or very high landslide areas, and high
erosion hazard areas.
h. Show trees to be removed in protected critical areas: wetlands, Shorelines of the
State, streams and lakes, floodways, floodplain slopes forty percent (40%) or greater,
very high landslide hazard areas, and critical habitat if the activity is exempt or allowed by
the critical areas regulations in RMC 4-3-050C5, Specific Exemptions.
i. Show all trees to be retained in critical area buffers.
i. In all other areas of the site, trees to be removed may be indicated generally with
clearing limit lines except for protected trees. The location, size, and species of all
protected trees on a site shall be shown. The plan shall also show the planned
replacement trees in accordance with RMC 4-4-130-H1e and any planned replanting
areas in accordance with RMC 4-4-130-H1f. (Amd. Ord. 4963, 5-13-2002: Ord. 5137,4-
25-2005)
4-9-195 ROUTINE VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PERMITS:
A. PURPOSE:
This Section provides a permit process for routine vegetation management implementing the tree
Gutting retention and land clearing regulations in RMC 4-4-130.
B. AUTHORITY:
The City's Development Services Division Director, or his duly authorized representative, is
hereby authorized and directed to interpret and enforce all the provisions of this Section.
27
C. APPLICABILITY, EXEMPTIONS, AND PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES:
1. General Applicability: The regulations of this Section apply to any developed, partially
developed or undeveloped property where routine vegetation management activities are
undertaken.
a. Permit Required for Routine Vegetation Management on Undeveloped
Properties: Any person who performs routine vegetation management on undeveloped
property in the City must obtain a routine vegetation management permit prior to
performing such work.
b. Permit Required to Use Mechanical Equipment: Except where use of mechanical
equipment is specifically listed as exempt. any person who uses mechanical equipment
for routine vegetation management, land clearing, tree GtltlifI§removal, landscaping, or
gardening on developed, partially developed or undeveloped property must obtain a
routine vegetation management permit prior to performing such work.
c. Tree CutiingRemoval -Solar Access or Pasture Land: A routine vegetation
management permit is required for tree GtltlifI§removal in greater amounts than specified
under partially exempt actions in RMC 4-4-130C~, Allowable Tree GuttingRemoval
Activities, for any property where tree GuttiRfjremoval is proposed without an associated
land development permit. A routine vegetation management permit may be issued
allowing tree GtltlifI§removal only in the following cases:
i. For purposes of allowing solar access to existing structures; or
ii. To create pasture land where agricultural activities are permitted uses in the zone.
Any tree GtltlifI§removal activities shall be the minimum necessary to accomplish the
purpose, and shall be consistent with RMC 4-4-130D2, Restrictions for Critical Areas.
2. Exemptions: Refer to RMC 4-4-130C.
3. Prohibited Activities: Refer to RMC 4-4-1300.
D. PROCEDURES AND REVIEW CRITERIA:
Permits for routine vegetation management shall be processed as follows:
1. Submittal: An application for a routine vegetation management permit shall be submitted
to the Development Services Division together with any necessary fees as required in
chapter 4-1 RMC.
2. Information Required: A routine vegetation management permit application shall contain
the information requested in RMC 4-8-120, Submittal Requirements -Specific to Application
Type.
3. Time: The permit shall be reviewed administratively within a reasonable period of time.
4. Routine Vegetation Management Permit Conditions: The routine vegetation
management permit may be denied or conditioned by the City to restrict the timing and extent
of activities in order to further the intent of this Section including:
28
a, Preserve and enhance the City's aesthetic character and maintain visual screening
and buffering,
b, Preserve habitat to the greatest extent feasible,
c, Prevent landslides, accelerated soil creep, settlement and subsidence hazards.
d, Minimize the potential for fiooding, erosion, or increased turbidity, siltation or other
form of pollution in a watercourse.
e, Ensure that the proposal will be consistent with RMC 4-4-130D2, Restrictions for
Critical Areas, and D3, Restrictions for CFitisal AfeasNative Growth Protection Areas -
Routine Vegetation Management Permits,
f, Ensure that protected trees are retained. consistent with RMC 4-4-130 H,
5. Time Limits for Routine Vegetation Management Permits: Any permit for routine
vegetation management shall be valid for one year from the date of issuance. An extension
may be granted by the Development Services Division for a period of one year upon
application by the property owner or manager, Application for such an extension must be
made at least thirty (30) days in advance of the expiration of the original permit and shall
include a statement of justification for the extension.
E. APPEALS:
Appeal of the decision to grant, grant with conditions, or deny a routine vegetation management
permit shall be made consistent with RMC 4-8-110, Appeals.
F. VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES:
Unless otherwise specified, violations of this Section are misdemeanors subject to RMC 1-3-1,
(Ord. 4963, 5-13-2002; Ord. 5159, 10-17-2005)
4-11-210 DEFINITIONS T
TREE: Any living W88SY ~Iant sRafasteFizeEi--9y-GRe main stem Sf tnml{ ans nnany 9ranSR9S ana
Raving a sali~9r sf six insRes (Ii") sr €Ireater, SF a nn~lti stemmes tr~nl{ system witR a aefinitely
ferm9a SFGwn, A self-supportying woody plant characterized by one main trunk or, for certain
species, multiple trunks. with a potential for maturity for a minimum trunk diameter of two inches
(2") and a potential minimum height of ten feet (10'),
TREE CUTTINGREMOVAL: The actual removal of the above ground plant material of a tree
through chemical, manual or mechanical methods,
29
..
• •
4-4-010 STANDARDS AND REVIEW CRITERIA FOR KEE~@}g..~1VT
OF' Rs~fW""" ANIMALS: NfON ''<:;
JA.N 23 2001
A, PURPOSE AND INTENT: RECEIVED
Since the nature of growth generates greater competition by both humans and animals
for available space, it is imperative that growth and the keeping of animals be located
appropriately and managed effectively to ensure compatibility and harmony. In particular,
animals need to be monitored to lessen the impacts of noise, odor, and potential
nuisance not only on-site but more particularly to adjacent properties. Animal owners
keep their animals for a variety of reasons including, but not limited to, ccmpanionship,
affection and protection. In order that the keeping of animals may coexist harmoniously
with adjacent and abutting uses, regulations are necessary.
B. AUTHORITY:
1. Responsibility: Responsibility for enforcement of the provisions of this Section shall
be as follows:
a. Animal Control Officer: All those matters related to care, maintenance, and
individual licensing.
b. Development Services Division: All those matters concerning land use and
zoning. Any doubt regarding responsibility will be administratively determined.
C. APPLICABILITY:
The keeping of animals by an owner/tenant where permitted in the zoning districts shall
comply with the requirements of this Section. These regulations shall apply to existing
and future cases where an owner/tenant is keeping animals.
D. EXEMPTIONS:
Household pets as defined in RMC 4-11-160 are a permitted use in all zones in the City
and as such are not regulated by this Section provided they number three (3) or less.
(Amd. Ord. 4999.1-13-2003)
•
E. PROHIBITED ANIMALS:
See RMC 6-6-12.
F. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR KEEPING ANIMALS:
1. Residence: It is assumed that an animal owner either lives on the property where
an animal is kept or has arranged with a tenant to care for the animal.
2. Shelter Location: Shelter shall be provided in clean structures located a minimum
of twenty five feet (25') from any property line unless otherwise specified in RMC 4-4-
010G and H, Additional Requirements for Hobby Kennels (Four (4) to Eight (8)
Animals), or Additional Requirements for Kennels (Nine (9) or More Animals). Private
barns and stables shall be located a minimum of fifty feet (50') from any property line.
All structures, corrals, feeding, exercising, training, riding or other facilities associated
with commercial horse and pony boarding, riding stables, and schools shall be
located a minimum of fifty feet (50') from any property line.
3. Confinement: All animals shall be kept and maintained in a manner which confines
their movement and activity to the premises of the ownerltenant.
4. Health and Safety: All animals shall be kept in such a manner so as not to create
any objectionable noise, odor, or otherwise cause to annoy or become a public
nuisance to the health, safety or general welfare of any person.
5. Animal Waste: Animal waste shall be properly disposed of, and any accumulated
animal waste must not be stored within the shelter setback area. Steps must be
taken to minimize odor and the potential for the infestation of insects or the spread of
disease. Any storage of animal waste must not constitute a nuisance as defined in
chapter 1-3 RMC.
6. Fencing: Electric and barbed wire fences may be used to confine animals provided
the conditions of RMC 4-4-040, Fences and Hedges, are met.
G. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR HOBBY KENNELS (FOUR (4)
TO EIGHT (8) ANIMALS):
,
1. Fencing Required: All open-run areas shall be surrounded by a six foot (6') fence
located a minimum of ten feet (10') from all property lines.
2. Waste Removal: Provision shall be made for the removal of animal and food
wastes, to keep the kennel free from the infestation of insects or rodents or disease,
and from obnoxious or foul odors.
3. SheRer Location: Shelter shall be provided in clean structures located only in the
rear yard unless the Development Services Division, based upon information
provided by an owner/tenant, determines that a side yard would be a better location
for the shelter. The shelter shall be located ten feet (10') from side and rear property
lines.
4. Hobby Kennel License: A hobby kennel license is required per RMC 4-9-100.
H. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR KENNELS (NINE (9) OR MORE
ANIMALS):
1. Shelter: Shelter shall be provided for animals in clean structures which shall be
kept structurally sound, maintained in good repair, contain the animals, and restrict
entrance of other animals. These structures, together with associated runs, shall be
located a minimum of fifty feet (50') from any property line and must be located in a
rear yard.
2. Food and Bedding: Suitable food and bedding shall be provided and stored in
facilities adequate to provide protection against infestation or contamination by
insects or rodents. Refrigeration shall be provided for the protection of perishable
foods.
3. Waste Removal: Provision shall be made for the removal of animals and food
wastes, bedding, and debris disposal in order to keep the kennel free from the
infestation of insects, rodents, or disease and from obnoxious or foul odors.
4. Criteria for Indoor Kennel Facilities: Applicants for kennels must show that indoor
facilities have a sufficient heating and cooling system to provide a moderate
temperature throughout the year; a sufficient ventilation system to circulate the air; an
adequate natural or artificial lighting system to allow inspection and cleaning at any
time of the day and that interior wall and ceiling surfaces are constructed of materials
which are resistant to the absorption of moisture and odors.
,
5. Criteria for Outdoor Kennel Facilities: Outdoor facilities will be constructed to
provide shelter from the weather and associated elements while providing sufficient
space for animal movement and exercise. Adequate drainage must be provided to
prevent water buildup and subsequent damage and to facilitate waste removal.
Adequate fences or retaining walls must be constructed to contain animals and
prevent intrusion by others.
I. REVIEW CRITERIA FOR KENNELS AND HOBBY KENNELS:
Special review criteria for all types of kennels to be considered by the Reviewing Official
are included in RMC 4-9-1 OOF.
J. REVIEW CRITERIA FOR BOARDING AND STABLES:
For uses such as commercial horse and pony boarding, riding stables, and schools the
conditional use criteria of RMC 4-9-030 shall be applicable.
K. BEEKEEPING:
1. Minimum Setback: Hives shall be located a minimum of twenty five feet (25') from
an interior lot line, with the hive(s) entrance(s) facing away from the nearest property
line. Hives shall be located a minimum of one hundred feet (100') from public and/or
private rights-of-way or access easements.
2. Maintenance Standards:
a. Hives shall be maintained to avoid overpopulation and minimize swarming, for
example by requeening regularly. so as not to become a nuisance.
b. Hives shall be marked or identified to notify visitors.
L. NONCONFORMING USES:
In cases where the keeping of animals does not comply with these regulations, the
situation shall be classified as a nonconforming use. +h&·owner/tenaAl-shall be allowed
to lE8e~ the n~ml3er of animals e)~isting at tile time the Seotion beoame effeotive (7 15
1. AniFAal RelllaooFAenl: Preperty-owners/tenants who lose an animal alter the
effeotive date of this Seotion shall·net-be allowed to replace the aniFAal with a similar
type of aniFAal.
2. TFansferabilil)': FurtherFAoffder-thef)urpescs ef this Cede, nenoonferFAin§ use
rights belong to a property ewnef'and ar8-flBt-attaehed-t~f6f3erty and therefore
are not transferaBle fraFA one property QNner te aRether with the sale of the f3Feperty.
M. VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES:
1. Compliance with Cumsnt Code Regulations: In those situations where the keeping
of animals does not comply with these regulations and the situation is not classified
as a nonconforming use. then the owner shall have to comply with the Code
regulations.
2. Fines: Violation of land use permits granted are subject to fines established in this
Code. All other violations of police regulations shall be administered in accordance
with Chapter 6-6 RMC, Animals and Fowl at Large.
(Ord. 3927, 7-15-1985; Ord. 4351, 5-4-1992; Amd. Ord. 4963, 5-13-2002)
4-2-060
6€VaOPMENT PlANNING
CITY OF RENTON
JAN 23 2007
REceIVED
B. ANIMALS AND RELATED USES Resource Conservation
Animal Husbandry (20 or fewer Pennitted Use #51
small animals per acre)
Animal Husbandry (4 or fewer Pennitted Use #51
medium animals per acre)
Animal Husbandry (maximum Pennitted Use #51
of l 2 large animal per acre)
Greater number of animals HeHring h)[8lTliner
than allowed above Administrative
Conditional Use #36
Beekeeping Pennitted Use #35
Kennels Administrative
Conditional Use #37
Kennels, Hobby Accessory Use #37
Pets, common household, up to 3 per Accessory Use
dwelling unit, or business
establishment
Stables, commercial Administrative
Conditional Use #37
Notes:
Residential-l DUiAcre Residential-4 DUI Acre Residential-8 D UI Acre
Pennitted Use #51 Pennitted Use #51 Pennitted Use #51
Pennitted Use #51 Pennitted Use #51 Pennitted Use #51
Pennitted Use #51 Pennitted Use #51 Pennitted Use #51
Hearing h)caminer I learing h)(aminer Heal'iAg h)(aminer
Administrative Administrative Administrative
Conditional Use #36 Conditional Use #36 Conditional Use #36
Permitted Use #35 Pennitted Use #35 Pennitted Use #35
Accessory Use #37 Accessory Use #37 Accessory Usc #37
Accessory Use Accessory Use Accessory Use
Administrative Conditional
Use #37
#35 -Provided hives are established on lots a minimum of one acre in size. Setbacks and other limitations apply per RMC 4-4-0 I 0, Standards and Review Criteria for
Keeping Animals.
#36 - A greater number of animals per acre than are otherwise allowed in this zone may be pennitted by tHe Hearing EJl"amiAer as an adl1linistFativ~ conditional usc;
provided:
•. The keeping of animals must meet the conditions ofRMC 4-4-0IOF, General Requirements for Keeping Animals; and
b, A farm management plan has been adopted based on the King County Conservation District's Farm Conservation and Practice Standards showing that
adequate pasturage to support a larger number of animals is provided.
..
~
I
I
#37-
#51 -
a.
b.
c.
a.
General Requirements: Subject to requirements ofRMC 4-4-101, Standards and Review Criteria for Keeping Animals, Hobby Kennels require a Hobby
Kennel License per RMC 4-9-100.
IL Zone -Kennels: In the IL Zone, when operations are predominately conducted out of doors rather thau completely enclosed within an enclosed
structure, an administrative conditional use pennit is required.
1M Zone -Kennels and Hobby Kennels: Within the area south ofI-405 and north ofSW 16'h street only indoor kennels or indoor hobby kennels are
permitted.
General Requirements: No animals are allowed on lots less than one acre in size. Animal husbandry uses are subject to the standards listed in RMC 4-4-
010, Standards and Review Criteria for Keeping Animals. Only combinations of medium and small animals or large and small animals may be permitted
outright on one·acre, provided that the overall total of animals is consistent with the requirements per acre (for example, twenty (20) small animals plus
four (4) medium animals).
b. R-8 and R-IO zones -Small Animals: only six (6) or fewer small animals per acre are permitted.
c. R-8 and R-IO zones -Large Animals: Large animals are permitted on lots four (4) acres or greater in size. Only one large animal per two (2) acres is
permitted.
"
•
4-2-110A
DI:: VELoPMENT PI..ANN'NG
CITY OF RENTON
JAN 23 2007
RECEIVED
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS
(Primary and Attached Accessory Structures)
RC R-1 R-4 R-8
DENSITY (Net Density in Dwelling Units per Net Acre)
Minimum Housing
Density for proposed 4 dwelling units per net
None None None
short plats or acre. 1,2
subdivisions
1 dwelling unit per 1 net acre
except that in designated
1 dwelling unit per 10 net
Urban Separators, density of
4 dwelling units per 1 net 8 dwelling units per 1 net Maximum Housing up to 1 unit per gross acre
Density2. 14 acres.s acre.13 acre.
may be permitted subject to
conditions in RMC 4-3-11 0,
Urban Separator Overlay.
NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS PER LOT
Maximum Number 1 dwelling with 1 accessory
1 dwelling unit. 1 dwelling unit. 1 dwelling unit.
per legal lot 2 unit.
LOT DIMENSIONS
1 acre. 8,000 sq. ft.,".13 except wI1ere 4,500 sq. ft. for parcels Minimum Lot Size for 10 acres. for small lot clusters 1O -f!f€
lots created after 10,000 sq. ft. for cluster greater than 1 acre.
allowed, where R-8 standards
-----
November 10, 2004 development. 3 shall apply. 5,000 sq. ft. for parcels 1
acre or less.
75 ft. for interior lots.
85 ft. for corner lots. 70 ft. for interior lots.
Minimum lot Width 150 ft. for interior lots. Except for clustered 80 ft. for corner 10ts.l1. 13
50 ft. for interior lots.
for lots created after 175 ft. for corner lots. development within Except wflefe-for small lot 60 ft. for corner lots.
November 10, 2004 designated Urban Separators, clusters'o aFe allev.e6 where,
R-4 standards shall apply for R-8 standards shall apply.
both interior and corner lots.
80 ft., 11.13 except for small lot
Minimum lot Depth clusters 'O where R-8 standards ------
for lots created after 200 ft. 85 ft. shall applyelwe~t where small 65 ft.
November 10, 2004 let-€ltIstBfS' °-afe a Hawed, R-8
slaR€!arfis-shall apply.
SETBACKS4
30 ft.,'"13 except for small lot 15 ft. for primary structure.
clusters lO where R-8 standards 20 ft. for attached garages
shall appl~eJ(6e~t wflere-smaH accessed from front or side
1et-eIHstefs 'O are allowe6, R 8 yard street.
staA6aF6s shall aflflly.
Minimum Front Yard 30ft .. 30 ft.G Unit with Alley Access
Unit with Alley Access Garage: Garage: The front yard
The front yard setback of the setback of the primary
primary structure may be structure may be reduced to
reduced to 20 ft. if all parking is 10ft. if all parking is provided
provided in the rear yard of the in the rear yard of the lot with
lot with access from a public access from a public right-of-
right-of-way or alley.· way or alley.·
20 ft.12. 13 Ol<Gept where 15 ft.1 for the primary
structure and 20 ft. for
Minimum Side Yard 30 ft.1 20 ft.' smalllo! oluslers'" are allowed, attached garages which
Along a Street 15 ft. is allowed in small lot access from the front and -~-.----
clusters 1O • side yard along a street.
15 combined ft.12. 13 is allowed
with a minimum of 5 ft. for any
side yard,;
Minimum Side Yard 25 ft. 15 ft. 5 ft.
5 ft is allowed in small lot
clusters ,08)wep! where smalllo!
eIustets 'O are a119we8. § It.
25 ft.
35 ft. 25 ft. WRere-smalilotclusters"-"are 20 ft. Minimum Rear Yard allowe8, 20 ft. is allowed in
small lot ciusters 10
In no case shall a structure In no case shall a structure
In no case shall a structure In no case shall a structure
over 42 in. in height intrude
over 42 in. in height intrude over 42 in. in height intrude into
over 42 in. in height intrude
into the 20 ft. clear vision into the 20 ft. clear vision Clear Vision Area into the 20 ft. clear vision area the 20 ft. clear vision area
area defined in RMC 4-11-area defined in RMC 4-11---defined in RMC 4-11-030. defined in RMC 4-11-030. --
030. 030.
10ft. landscaped setback
10ft. landscaped setback 10ft. landscaped setback from 10ft. landscaped setback Minimum Freeway from the street property
Frontage Setback line.
from the street property line. the street property line. from the street property line.
BUILDING STANDARDS
Maximum Building 2 stories and 30 ft. for standard
Height and Number of roof.
Stories, except for 2 stories and 30 ft. 2 stories and 30 ft. 2 stories and 35 ft. for roofs 2 stories and 30 ft.
uses having a "Public having a pitch greater than
Suffix" (P) 3/12.
designation9
Maximum Height for
Wireless See RMC 4-4-140G. See RMC 4-4-140G. See RMC 4-4-140G. See RMC 4-4-140G.
Communication
Facilities
Lots 5 acres or more: 2%.
An additional 5% of the total
area may be used for
agricultural buildings.
Maximum Building Lots greater than 5,000 sq. ft.:
Lots 5,000 sq. ft. or greater:
Lots 10,000 sq. ft. to 5
Coverage 35% or 2,500 sq. ft., whichever
35% or 2,500 sq. ft.,
acres: 15%. On lots greater
(Including primary 35%. is greater.
whichever is greater.
than 1 acre, an additional
and accessory 5% of the total area may be Lots 5,000 sq. ft. or less: 50%.
Lots less than 5,000 sq. ft.:
buildings) used for agricultural 50%.
buildings.
Lots 10,000 sq. ft. or less:
35%.
-All dwelling units shall All dwelling units shall provide -All dwelling units shall
Vertical Facade provide vertical facade vertical facade modulation at ~rovide vertical facade
Modulation modulation at least every least every twenty horizontal modulation at least every
twent~ horizontal feet (20'), feet (20'), including front, side twenty horizontal feet (~QJ,
including front, side and rear and rear facades when visible ~~Iuding fro_~t, side and rear
facades when visible from a from a street facades when visible from a
street. street.
Architectural features shall be Architectural features shall
provided on all d",ellinQ units. Architectural features shall be be provided on all dwelling
These shall include provided on all dwelling units. units. These shall include
decorative hip or gable roofs These shall include decorative decorative hip or gable roofs
with a pitch equal to or hip or gable roofs with a pitch with a pitch equal to or
greater than one to two (1 :2), equal to or greater than one to greater than one to two (1 :2),
windows and doors with two (1 :2), windows and doors windows and doors with
decorative trim at least four with decorative trim at least decorative trim at least four
Architectural inches (4") in width, and four inches (4") in width, and inches (4") in width, and
Features eaves projecting at least eaves pr()jecting at_least eaves projecting at least I
eigl,teE>".",ches (18") from eighteen inches (18") from the eighteen inches (18")Jrom
the face ofti1e buildlngon at face of the building on at least the face of thebuilding on at
least sevent~ five [lercent sevent~ five percent (75%) of least seventy five percent
(75%) of the building's the building's exterior perimeter (75%) of the building's
exterior perimeter with with horizontal fascia at least exterior [lerimeter with
horizontal fascia at least ten ten inches (10") deep on all horizontal fascia at least ten
inches (10") dee[l on all sides sides of the structure. inches (10") dee" on all
of the structure. sides of the structure.
LANDSCAPING AND OPEN SPACE
Minimum Off-Site 5 ft. wide irrigated or drought 5 ft. wide irrigated or drought
Landscaping Abutting resistant landscape strip; resistant landscape strip;
Non-Arterial Public provided, that if there is provided, that if there is
-
Streets for Plats and additional undeveloped right-of-additional undeveloped right-
Short Plats Submitted way in excess of 5 ft., this shall of-way in excess of 5 ft., this
on or after November also be landscaped. shall also be landscaped.
10,2004
10 ft. wide irrigated or drought
10ft. wide irrigated or
Minimum Off-Site resistant landscape strip;
drought resistant landscape
Landscaping Abutting provided, that if there is
strip; provided, that if there is
Principal, Minor and additional undeveloped right-of-
additional undeveloped right-
Collector Arterial way in excess of 10ft., this
of-way in excess of 10ft., this
Streets for Plats and shall also be landscaped,
shall also be landscaped,
Short Plats Submitted unless otherwise determined
unless otherwise determined by
on or after November the reviewing official during the
by the reviewing official
10,2004 subdivision process.
during the subdivision
process.
Minimum On-or Off-At least two (2) trees of a City-At least two (2) trees of a
Site Tree approved species with a City-approved species with a
Requirements for minimum caliper of 1 1/2" per minimum caliper of 1 1/2" per
Plats and Short Plats tree shall be planted in the front tree shall be planted in the
Submitted on or after yard or planting strip of every front yard or planting strip of
November 10, 2004 lot prior to occupancy. every lot prior to occupancy.
EXCEPTIONS
Nothing herein shall be Nothing herein shall be Nothing herein shall be Nothing herein shall be
determined to prohibit the determined to prohibit the determined to prohibit the determined to prohibit the
Pre-Existing Legal construction of a single construction of a single family construction of a single family construction of a single family
Lots family dwelling and its dwelling and its accessory dwelling and its accessory dwelling and its accessory
accessory buildings on a buildings on a pre-existing buildings on a pre-existing legal buildings on a pre-existing
pre-existing legal lot legal lot provided that all lot provided that all setbacks, legal lot provided that all
provided that all setbacks, setbacks, lot coverage, height lot coverage, height limits, setbacks, lot coverage,
lot coverage, height limits, limits, infrastructure, and infrastructure, and parking height limits, infrastructure,
infrastructure, and parking parking requirements for this requirements for this zone can and parking requirements for
requirements for this zone zone can be satisfied and be satisfied and provisions of this zone can be satisfied
can be satisfied and provisions of RMC 4-3-050, RMC 4-3-050, Critical Areas, and provisions of RMC 4-3-
provisions of RMC 4-3-050, Critical Areas, can be met. can be met. 050, Critical Areas, can be
Critical Areas, can be met. met.
CRITICAL AREAS
See RMC 4-3-050 and 4-3-See RMC 4-3-050 and 4-3-See RMC 4-3-050 and 4-3---See RMC 4-3-050 and 4-3-090. -
General 090. 090. 090.
(Ord. 4869,10-23-2000; Amd. Ord. 4963, 5-13-2002; Ord. 5100,11-1-2004; Ord. 5132, 4-4-2005; Ord. 5153, 9-26-2005)
4-2-1100
CONDITIONS ASSOCIATED WITH
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE FOR
I
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS
1. a. Phasing, shadow platting, or land reserves may be used to satisfy the minimum density
requirements if the applicant can demonstrate that the current development would
not preclude the provision of adequate access and infrastructure to future
development and would allow for the eventual satisfaction of minimum density
requirements through future development.
b. In the event the applicant can show that minimum density cannot be achieved due to
lot configuration, lack of access, environmental or physical constraints, minimum
density requirements may be waived by the Reviewing Official.
2. Use-related provisions are not variable. Use-related provisions that are not eligible for a
variance include: building size, units per structure/lot, or densities. Unless bonus size or
density provisions are specifically authorized, the modification of building size, units per
structure, or densities requires a legislative change in the code provisions and/or a
Comprehensive Plan amendment/rezone.
3. Clustering is allowed to meet objectives such as preserving significant natural features,
providing neighborhood open space, or facilitating the provision of sewer service. Within
designated urban separators, clustering is required, consistent with the provision of RMC
4-3-110, Urban Separator Overlay Regulations.
a. The maximum net density requirement shall not be exceeded except that within urban
separators a density bonus may be granted allowing the total density to achieve one
dwelling unit per gross contiguous acre for projects that meet the following criteria:
(i) Provision of native vegetation cover on sixty-five percent (65%) of the gross area
of all parcels in the land use action, including both the area within and
outside the open space corridor, with either existing or new vegetative cover,
and at least one of the following additional criteria:
(A) Enhancement of wetlands is provided at a ratio of one-half (1/2) acre
enhanced for one acre delineated within the urban separator pursuant to
RMC 4-3-050M12b, Evaluation Criteria, and RMC 4-3-050M12c, Wetlands
Chosen for Enhancement. Enhancement proposed for a density bonus may
not also be used for a mitigation for other wetland alterations.
(8) Legal nonconforming uses are removed from the site and/or brought into
conformance with Renton standards.
(C) Natural surface pedestrian trails, with public access, are provided as part of an
adopted trail system or, where there is no planned trail system, in a
configuration approved by the Reviewing Official.
(D) In the absence of either wetlands or legal nonconforming uses on the site, public access and trails shall be
required to the satisfaction of the Reviewing Official.
(ii) Parcels within the urban separator may be combined into larger contiguous
holdings to allow platting to achieve bonus density; however, existing legal
lots shall not be reduced in land area for the purpose of transferring density
unless such lots are included in a proposed plat.
b. The area of individual lots shall not be less than ten thousand (10,000) square feet.
4. Allowed Projections into Setbacks:
a. Fireplace Structures, Windows: Fireplace structures, bay or garden windows, enclosed
stair landings, and similar structures as determined by the Zoning Administrator may
project twenty four inches (24") into any setback; provided, such projections are:
(i) Limited to two (2) per facade.
(ii) Not wider than 10'.
b. Fences: See RMC 4-4-040.
c. Steps and Decks: Uncovered steps and decks not exceeding eighteen inches (18")
above the finished grade may project to any property line. Uncovered steps and
decks having no roof covering and not exceeding forty two inches (42") high may be
built within the front yard setback.
d. Eaves: Eaves and cornices may project up to twenty four inches (24") into any required
setback.
5. In order to be considered detached, a structure must be sited a minimum of six feet (6') from
any residential structure.
6. A front yard setback of less than twenty feet (20') is allowed if equal to or greater than the
average of the front yard setback of the existing, abutting primary structures; however, in
no case shall a minimum setback of less than twenty feet (20') be allowed for garages
which access from the front yard street(s).
7. For pre-existing legal lots having less than the minimum lot width required by this Section, the
following chart shall apply for determining the required minimum side yard width along a
street:
WIDTH OF EXISTING, LEGAL LOT MINIMUM SIDE YARD WIDTH ALONG A STREET
ReZONE
150 feet or less 25 ft.
R-1 ZONE
Less than or equal to 50 ft. 10 ft.
50.1 to 51 ft. 11 ft.
51.1 to 52 ft. 12 ft.
52.1 to 53 ft. 13 ft.
53.1 to 54 ft. 14 ft.
54.1 to 55 ft. 15 ft.
55.1 to 56 ft. 16 ft.
56.1 to 57 ft. 17 ft.
57.1 to 58 ft. 18 ft.
58.1 to 59 ft. 19 ft.
59.1 and greater 20 ft.
R-4 or R-8 ZONE
Less than or equal to 50 ft. 10ft.
50.1 to 52 ft. 11 ft.
52.1 to 54 ft. 12 ft.
54. 1 to 56 ft. 13 ft.
56.1 10 58 ft. 14 ft.
58.1 or greater 15 ft.
However, in no case shall a structure over forty two inches (42") in height intrude into the
twenty-foot (20') clear vision area defined in RMC 4-11-030.
8. In no case shall building height exceed the maximum allowed by the Airport Related Height
and Use Restrictions, for uses located within the Federal Aviation Administration Airport
Zones designated under RMC 4-3-020.
9. "Public Suffix" (P) properties are allowed the following height bonus: Publicly owned
structures shall be permitted an additional fifteen feet (15') in height above that otherwise
permitted in the zone if "pitched roofs," as defined herein, are used for at least sixty
percent (60%) or more of the roof surface of both primary and accessory structures. In
addition, the height of a publicly owned structure may be increased as follows, up to a
maximum height of seventy five feet (75') to the highest point of the building:
a. When abutting a public street, one additional foot of height for each additional one and
one-half feet (1-1/2') of perimeter building setback beyond the minimum street
setback required; and/or
b. When abutting a common property line, one additional foot of height for each additional
two feet (2') of perimeter building setback beyond the minimum required along a
common property line.
10. In order te seF\fe as a transition between the lower density R 4 Zono and higher density
Eleveleprnent, "s§malilot clusters" of up to a maximum of fifty (50) lots shall be allowed
within si)( hunEireEileet (fl99'}-ol-the Single Farnily Land Use Designation as shown on the
Land Use Map oHhe Gornprehensive-P-lanR-4 Zone, whon at least thirty percent (30%) of
the site is permanently set aside as "significant open space." Such open space shall be
situated to act as a visual buffer between small lot clusters and other development in the
zone. The percentage of open space required may be reduced by the reviewing official to
twenty percent (20%) of the site whon:
a. Public access is provided to open space;
b. Soft surface trails are provided within wetland buffers; and
c. Storm water ponds are designed to eliminate engineered slopes requiring fencing and
enhanced to allow passive and/or active recreation.
-.
S~eeial areAitectural features sAalllle ~f0vi6ed on all dwelling units in sFRalilet dusters. TAese
sAall include seeorative Aip or-gattle-fOOls witA a pi teA eElual to or greater tAan one to !VO'S
(1 :2), winds'Ns and-aoors-with decorative triFR at least four ineAes (4") in widtA, and eaves
projeoting at least eigAteen inc-ftes-{-Hl~)froFR tAe faee sf tAe Builsing sn at least seventy
five percent (75%)ef.-the--ooilding's exterior periFReter witA Aorizental fasoia at least ten
ineAes (10") deep on all sides of lhe-s\fuc4tlfe,
All portions of a site that are not dedicated to platted single family lots or a dedicated right of
way shall be set in a separate tract and/or tracts to preserve existing viable stands of
trees or other native vegetation. The tract may also be used as a receiving area for tree
replacement requirements in accordance with RMC 4-4-130H,
Such tracts shall be shown and recorded on the face of the plat to be preserved in perpetuity.
Such tracts may be included in contiguous open space for the purposes of qualifying for small
lot clustered development.
Where trees are removed, landseapiRg-fiesigned--te-fej3iac-e-the-luflctions of existing trees is
reEluireEi. they shall be replaced in accordance with RMC 4-4-130 H.
11. Lot size, width, and depth may be reduced by the Reviewing Official when, due to lot
configuration or access, four (4) dwelling units per net acre cannot be achieved. The
reduction shall be the minimum needed to allow four (4) dwelling units per net acre and
shall be limited to the following minimum dimensions:
Lot size -seven thousand two hundred (7,200) sq. ft.
Lot width -sixty feet (60').
Lot depth -seventy feet (70').
12. When lot size is reduced for the purpose of achieving maximum density, setbacks may also
be reduced by the Reviewing Official. Setback reductions shall be limited to the following:
Front -twenty feet (20').
Side yard along a street -fifteen feet (15') primary structure, twenty feet (20') attached garage
with access from the side yard.
Side -Minimum side yard combined setback -fifteen feet (15').
Minimum for one yard -five feet (5').
13. For properties vested with a complete plat application prior to November 10, 2004, and for
the Mosier II, Maplewood East and Anthone, the following standards apply. Vested plats
must be developed within five (5) years of preliminary plat approval andlor annexation.
-.
Maximum density -five (5) dwelling units per net acre.
Minimum lot size -seven thousand two hundred (7,200) sq. ft.
Minimum lot width -sixty feet (60') for interior lots, seventy feet (70') for comer lots.
Minimum lot depth -seventy feet (70').
Minimum front yard -fifteen feet (15') for the primary structure, twenty feet (20') for an attached
or detached garage. For a unit with alley access garage, the front yard setback for the
primary structure may be reduced to ten feet (10') if all parking is provided in the rear yard
of the lot with access from a public right-of-way or alley.
Minimum side yard along a street -fifteen feet (15').
Minimum side yard -five feet (5').
14. Covenants filed as part of any final plat shall establish that future division of land within the
plat must be consistent with the maximum density requirements as measured within the
plat as a whole as of the time of future division.
(Amd. Ord. 4963, 5-13-2002; Ord. 5100,11-1-2004; Ord. 5132, 4-4-2005; Ord. 5153. 9-26-
2005)